New approaches to SNe Ia progenitors

Abstract: Although Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) are a major tool in cosmology and play a key role in the chemical evolution of galaxies, the nature of their progenitor systems (apart from the fact that they must contain at least one white dwarf, that explodes) remains largely unknown. In the last decade, considerable efforts have been made, both observationally and theoretically, to solve this problem. Observations have, however, revealed a previously unsuspected variety of events, ranging from very underluminous outbursts to clearly overluminous ones, and spanning a range well outside the peak luminosity--decline rate of the light curve relationship, used to make calibrated candles of the SNe Ia. On the theoretical side, new explosion scenarios, such as violent mergings of pairs of white dwarfs, have been explored. We review those recent developments, emphasizing the new observational findings, but also trying to tie them to the different scenarios and explosion mechanisms proposed thus far.

\section{Introduction}
\label{}
Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) have been the tool that made possible the
discovery of the acceleration of the expansion of the Universe (Riess et al.
1998; Perlmutter et al. 1999), and they are now providing new insights on the
cosmic component, dubbed ``dark energy'', thus revealed. However, in contrast
with their key role as cosmological probes, and after more than 50 years of
supernova research, the nature of their progenitors remains elusive. As far
back as 1960, it was established that Type I supernovae (in fact, the
now denominated SNe Ia, or thermonuclear supernovae) should result from the
ignition of degenerate nuclear fuel in stellar material (Hoyle \& Fowler
1960). The absence of hydrogen in the spectra of the SNe Ia almost
immediately suggested that they were due to thermonuclear explosions of
white dwarfs (WDs). Isolated white dwarfs were once thought to be possible
progenitors (Finzi \& Wolf 1967), but soon discarded due to incompatibility
with basic results from stellar evolution.
Instead, accretion of matter from a close companion star in a binary system,
by a previously formed C+O white dwarf with a mass close to the Chandrasekhar
mass, provides a viable mechanism to induce the explosion (Wheeler \& Hansen
1971).

Two main competing production channels are still under discussion nowadays.
One possible path is the so--called single degenerate (SD) channel,
where a C+O white dwarf grows in mass by accretion from a non--degenerate
stellar companion: a main sequence star, a subgiant, a helium star, a red
giant, or an AGB star (Whelan \& Iben 1973; Nomoto 1982). Another possible
path is the double degenerate (DD) channel (Webbink 1984; Iben \& Tutukov
1984), where two WDs merge due to the loss of angular momentum by
gravitational radiation. The merging could produce the collapse of the white
dwarf (Saio \& Nomoto 1985), or it can produce a larger C+O white dwarf
configuration that then explodes (Pakmor et al. 2012).

\bigskip

In the decade of the 90's, the variety amongst SNe Ia was discovered, ranging
from events such as SN 1991bg to those as SN 1991T, through normal SNe Ia
(see Filippenko 1997a,b; Branch et al. 2007; Leibundgut 2011). Such
diversity was made amenable for cosmology when the correlation of the
luminosity at the maximum of the light curve of each SN Ia with its rate of
decline was parameterized (Phillips 1993, 1999; Riess, Press \& Kirshner 1995;
Perlmutter et al. 1997). It became clear, then, that SNe Ia could
be used as distance indicators in cosmology, and that led to the
aforementioned discovery.

Yet, the first decade of the new century has brought new surprises:
super--Chandrasekhar supernovae, as well as extremly faint ones (see below).
Neither of them are useful for cosmology, although they are not a severe
nuisance there, since they can be easily identified, and eliminated from the
large samples of SNe Ia collected for cosmological probes. Also, various teams
have started to measure supernova rates at a wide variety of redshifts. The
idea of using SNe Ia rates to discover the nature of the progenitor systems
has now become an active line of research. Finally, high--resolution
spectroscopic observations of SN have yielded the surprising
result of time--varying absorptions, which indicate the existence of outflows
in the circumstellar medium surrounding some SN, and points to
possible nova activity previous to the explosion. An intriguing C II feature
has been identifieed, close to the Si II line typical of SNe Ia, and that has
led to thinking in two different directions: either the thermonuclear flame
does not burn the outermost layers of the white dwarf, or maybe C is a
signature of the merged white dwarf companion of the SN. There are also better
estimates of the maximum H mass that could be present in the envelopes of the
pre--SNe, if the explosions were triggered by accretion from a non--degenerate
companion. There is continued failure to detect H from the radio emission of
the SNe Ia, and there could be constraints from the X--ray emission as well.
The task of searching for the companion star in Galactic supernovae has
already given some definite results, and there are, now, simulations of the
impact of the SN ejecta on the companion star that can be compared with the
observations.

In the following Sections, we present and discuss those new results. In
Section 2 we briefly review the different models proposed to explain the
SN Ia phenomenon. Section 3 examines how the Delay Time Distribution (DTD)
constrains
the possible SN Ia progenitors. In Section 4 we discuss the carbon and
oxygen absorption features seen, in recent years, in the spectra of SN Ia at
early times, while Section 5 deals with the emission features at late times.
Section 6 discusses the variable blueshifted sodium feature seen in some
SNe Ia. The X--ray constraints are presented in Section 7, and the radio
constraints in Section 8. In Section 9 we report the limits on the
luminosities of the companions of SNe Ia obtained from pre--explosion
images. Section 10 deals with the detection of companions throught the early
light curves of SNe Ia. Section 11 reviews the direct searches for surviving
companions, in the Galaxy and in the Large Magellanic Cloud. Section 12 deals
with the identification of possible candidates to SNe Ia through
reconstruction of the orbital evolution of diverse close binary systems
containing white dwarfs. Section 13 addresses the important problem of the
outliers from the peak brightness--decline rate of the light curve
relationship used to make these SNe calibrated candles for cosmology. Section
14 deals with the bulk of SNe Ia used for cosmology. We summarize the current
state of affairs in the last Section.

\section{Models}

An ideally complete model of a Type Ia supernova should start
from the formation and subsequent evolution of the binary system assumed
to originate it, include possible common envelope episodes, mass tranfer
stages (generally nonconservative), especially those immediately leading to
the explosion, rotational states of the two stars involved, and finally
the ignition process and its development into a full thermonuclear explosion
(hydrodynamics and nucleosynthesis). From that, light curves and spectra of
the emitted light should be computed, for the different stages of the
outburst (extending until the nebular phase). The characteristics of the
resulting remnants should be predicted as well. In addition, the frequency of
the explosions corresponding to the model has to be estimated, for different
galactic environments. The whole programme involves very diverse domains of
expertise, so the progress has been disperse.

\subsection{Double-degenerate models}

Those models were first proposed by Webbink (1984) and by Iben \& Tutukov
(1984). The most favored scenario, in the latter work, started from binaries
with component masses in the range 5--9 $M_{\odot}$. They experienced two
common envelope stages and ended as a pair of C+O white dwarfs, with masses in
the range 0.7--1 $M_{\odot}$, separated by distances 0.2--0.35 $R_{\odot}$ and
orbiting each other with periods $P$ between 12 min and 14 hrs. The system
then losses angular momentum by emission of gravitational waves and the two
white dwarfs merge on a time scale ranging from 10$^{5}$ to 10$^{10}$ yr
(merging of binaries due to the emission of gravitational radiation had already
been considered by Tutukov \& Yungelson 1979). The
merging would occur through disruption of the less massive component of the
system. That component fills its Roche lobe first (larger radius and
smaller Roche lobe). The mass transfer, then, should have a runaway character,
since the more mass the white dwarf losses, the larger its radius becomes (and
the smaller its Roche lobe). The material of the disrupted white dwarf would
form a thick disk around the more massive one, which would accrete mass from
it until reaching the Chandrasekhar limit and explosively ignite C at its
centre. With the caveat that the effects on the orbit of the two common
envelope phases could only be roughly approximated, Iben \& Tutukov (1984)
found that the rate of such mergings might, alone, account for the Galactic
SN Ia rate.

In the preceding scenario, it was assumed that the only effect of the
accretion of matter by the more massive white dwarf, from the debris of its
companion, should be growth up to the Chandrasekhar mass. That was soon
challenged by Saio \& Nomoto (1985), who argued that a very fast mass
transfer ($\dot M \sim 1\times10^{-5}\ M_{\odot}\ yr^{-1}$) would produce an
off--centre C flash. A C--burning front would then propagate (nonexplosively)
down to the centre of the white dwarf, changing the chemical composition from
C+O to O+Ne+Mg along the way. Electron captures on Mg and Ne would subsequently
make the Chandrasekhar mass smaller than the white dwarf mass, and
gravitational collapse would ensue. The outcome should thus be the formation
of a neutron star, rather than a SN Ia explosion. Nomoto \& Iben (1985) further
concluded that the off--centre C ignition would always occur unless the
mass accretion rate were less than one--fifth of the Eddington limit for an
isolated white dwarf. Later hydrodynamic simulations (Benz et al. 1990;
Guerrero et al. 2004) have confirmed that a heavy accretion disk is formed
around the most massive white dwarf. Whether a SN Ia ensues would depend on
the mass accretion rate of the white dwarf from the disk, that being
determined by the viscosity of the latter: a sufficiently low viscosity would
allow the white dwarf to grow while avoiding the off--centre, non--explosive
ignition of C (Mochkovich, Guerrero \& Segretain 1997). The issue remains
open. Another effect of mass acccretion from a massive disk should be the gain
of angular momentum by the white dwarf. Its consequences have been studied by
Piersanti et al. (2003a,b) and Tornamb\'e \& Piersanti (2013). They find that
rotation can stabilize the white dwarf against contraction, even when its mass
becomes larger than the Chandrasekhar mass. Later, loss of angular momentum by
emission of gravitational waves allows contraction, until the conditions for
explosive C ignition are reached at the centre. Recently,
Lebanon, Soker \& Garcia--Berro (2014) find constraints on the classical DD
type of progenitor from the disk--originated matter around the exploding WD,
as this matter will be shocked  by the SN ejecta and end up in a radiation
implying a larger progenitor radius than observed.

A different approach is based on the violent merging of a pair of white dwarfs
(Pakmor et al. 2010). Another possibility is the direct
collision of a pair of white dwarfs. Such collisions could take place
in environments of high star number density, like globular clusters or
the Galactic centre (Benz et al. 1989), and also in triple star systems
where a close pair of white dwarfs have their orbits perturbed by the third,
more distant star (Thompson 2011; Katz \& Dong 2012; Kushnir et al. 2013;
Dong et al. 2014). In the
hydrodynamic simulations of Pakmor et al. (2010), the merging of two equal
mass ($\sim0.9\ M_{\odot}$) white dwarfs produced a subluminous SN Ia. Further
modeling (Pakmor et al. 2011) has shown that violent mergings where the primary
mass is $\sim0.9\ M_{\odot}$ can give rise to subluminous SNe Ia for
unequal masses too, provided that the mass ratio is more than about 0.8.
Later on, Pakmor et al. (2012) have found that the violent merging of two C+O
white dwarfs, with masses 0.9 M$_{\odot}$ and 1.1 M$_{\odot}$ (assumed to
induce the detonation of the C+O mixture) can account for normal SNe Ia
as well. That has been very recently confirmed by Garc\'{\i}a--Senz et al.
(2013), who find that the amount of $^{56}$Ni produced in the collisions
ranges from 0.1 M$_{\odot}$ to 1.1 M$_{\odot}$, thus covering from subluminous
through normal up to overluminous SNe Ia. They argue, however, that given the
distribution of white dwarf masses, mostly subluminous events should arise.
On the other hand, Ruiter et al. (2013) find that the brightness distribution
of the explosions produced by violent mergers matches the shape of that
observed for SNe Ia (although the issue depends on the occurrence of a
particular phase of mass accretion during binary evolution). Very recently,
Kromer et al. (2013a) have successfully explained the narrow emission lines
of [O I] in the late--time spectra of SN 2010lp (a subluminous SN Ia) by the
violent merger of two C+O white dwarfs, with masses of 0.9 and 0.76
M$_{\odot}$. Even more recently, Moll et al. (2013) have found that prompt
detonations following the merging of two white dwarfs can not only reproduce
both common and overluminous SNe Ia, but also the width--luminosity relation
on which the use of these supernovae as cosmological distance indicators
is based.

A key point, though, is whether there are or not enough close binary white
dwarf binaries to account for the rate of occurrence of SNe Ia. One approach to
this problem is to look for such systems in the Galaxy. Napiwotzki et al.
(2007) have reported the results of a systematic radial velocity survey for
double degenerate binaries as potential progenitors of Type Ia supernovae.
More than 1000 WDs and pre--white dwarfs  were observed with the VLT. The
frequency of He WDs is much higher than that of C+O WDs, and they regard
He WD donors as a possible important channel for SNe Ia. Recently, Badenes
\& Maoz (2012), using multi--epoch spectroscopy of $\sim$ 4000 white dwarfs
from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, have determined the white dwarf merger rate
per unit stellar mass in our Galaxy. They find that the total rate might
well account for the SN Ia rate in the Milky Way and galaxies of the same type,
but that the rate of merging of pairs of white dwarfs with a total mass
above the Chandrasekhar mass is only $\sim$1/14 of the total rate.
So, unless sub--Chandrasekhar mergers can produce SNe Ia, the
double--degenerate channel should be, at most, a minor contributor to the
SN Ia phenomenon.

SN Ia models based on the non--violent merging of two white dwarfs, with a
total mass below
the Chandrasekhar mass, involve a C+O plus a He white dwarf. The He accreted
by the more massive (C+O) white dwarf detonates and the shock wave thus
generated can either induce the detonation of the C+O layers immediately
below or converge near the centre and produce a C+O detonation there (Sim et.
al. 2012). These authors find that the light curves and spectra of such
explosions do match those observed in SNe Ia. Besides, Ruiter et al.
(2011) had calculated that if those double--detonation models were able to
produce explosions similar to SNe Ia, then the sub--Chandrasekhar explosions
would account for a substantial fraction, at least, of the observed SN Ia rate.
They also found that the double white dwarf channel involving a C+O plus a He
white dwarf should have a distribution of delay times (between formation of the
binary and the SN explosion) spanning from 800 Myr up to the Hubble time.

\subsection{ Single--degenerate models.}

The channel leading to a SN Ia explosion via mass accretion, by a C+O white
dwarf, from a non--degenerate binary companion, was first modelled by Whelan
\& Iben (1973), although the idea, as we have seen, already appears in
Wheeler \& Hansen (1971): a primary with a mass of 1.8--3 $M_{\odot}$, plus a
secondary with $M \lesssim 0.8\ M_{\odot}$, initially form a system with an
orbital period between 5 and 9 years. The primary then evolves and becomes a
C+O white dwarf, with a mass close to the Chandrasekhar mass. The secondary,
after $\sim$ 10$^{10}$ yr, becomes an AGB star, fills its Roche lobe, and
transfers mass to the  white dwarf, which then reaches the Chandrasekhar mass
and explodes. In this first model, the mass of the secondary was chosen to
explain the occurrence of SNe Ia in elliptical galaxies, long after star
formation has stopped. Subsequently, a variety of initial binary systems, in
which mass accretion by the white dwarf can take place at different
evolutionary stages of its companion (main sequence, subgiant, red giant,
AGB), and either from Roche lobe overflow or from a stellar wind, have been
proposed. Also, mass loss by the two components of the binary can take place
more than once, as well as mass transfer (either conservative or
non--conservative). The possibility that the companion might have lost its
hydrogen--rich envelope and become a helium star, at the time of mass tranfer
to the white dwarf, has also been considered.

A problem common to both the single--degenerate models and to the
double--degenerate models, in which the
conditions for explosive C ignition, close to the centre of the C+O white
dwarf, are reached when the white dwarf mass has grown to the Chandrasekhar
mass (or when rotational support has been lost, for masses above such limit),
is that thermonuclear burning propagation should be subsonic at first
(deflagration) and, at some point, become supersonic (detonation). If only
deflagrations were involved, the explosions could just produce a subclass of
subluminous SNe Ia (Fink et al. 2014). On the other hand, pure detonations of
Chandrasekhar--mass white dwarfs would burn the C+O mixture to Fe--peak
elements entirely, in stark contrast with the observations, that show
intermediate--mass elements at and around maximum light. A  self--consistent
modeling of the deflagration/detonation transition still remains elusive,
although steady progress is being made (Woosley 2007; Aspden, Bell \& Woosley
2010; Schmidt et al. 2010; Woosley, Kerstein \& Aspden 2011).

There is another problem that only concerns single--degenerate models of
SNe Ia: the possible explosive ignition of the material (hydrogen or helium)
accumulated on the surface of the accreting C+O white dwarf, before the
latter reaches the Chandrasekhar mass. Also, in the case of hydrogen,
a high rate of accretion may not lead to explosion but to the formation of
an extended envelope, which would be ejected by interaction with the
mass--donor star, that terminating the accretion process.

Accumulation of hydrogen on the surface of a white dwarf at a low rate
should produce nova--like explosions, in which all the accreted material
(and maybe even more) would be expelled (Nomoto 1982; Livio \& Truran 1992).
The lower limit on the mass--accretion rate, to avoid explosions and strong
flashes, is uncertain and depends on the mass of the white dwarf, but a
value $\dot M \sim 5\times10^{-8}\ M_{\odot} yr^{-1}$ is often given, although
Kercek, Hillebrandt \& Truran (1999), in 3D simulations, obtained steady
hydrogen burning for rates as low as $\dot M \sim 5\times10^{-9}\ M_{\odot}
yr^{-1}$ (see discussion in Hillebrandt \& Niemeyer 2000).

Even if hydrogen is burned steadily or in weak flashes, the resulting helium
layer should explosively burn, in a detonation, if the rate of accumulation
of helium were $\dot M \lesssim 5\times10^{-8}\ M_{\odot} yr^{-1}$ (although
this is only true for white dwarf masses $M \lesssim 1.13\ M_{\odot}$). The
same applies to the direct accretion of helium. Lower rates would thus be
excluded from the production of Chandrasekhar--mass explosions, but they
could lead to sub--Chandrasekhar, edge--lit explosions, instead.

The explosion of helium shells in accreting white dwarfs as a Type Ia  SN
mechanism was first proposed by Taam (1980) and Nomoto (1982a)
(the ``double detonation'' model), and numerically studied, in
one--dimensional (1D) numerical simulations, by Woosley, Taam \& Weaver
(1986), and by Livne (1990). The earliest 2D simulations were made
by Livne \& Glasner (1991). Such explosions were further
investigated by Woosley \& Weaver (1994), and by Livne \& Arnett (1995).
The ``robustness'' of the double detonation model has been recently
checked in 2D and 3D simulations by Moll \& Woosley (2013), whilst the
conditions for producing helium detonations have been examined by Woosley
\& Kasen (2011). The first evidence of a sub--Chandrasekhar explosion was
found by Ruiz--Lapuente et al. (1993) (later confirmed by Mazzali et
al. 1997), from modeling the spectra of SN
1991bg. Whether double detonation models  produce explosions characteristically
similar to those of SNe Ia remains an open question, but Ruiter et al.
(2011) find that the helium star channel would have delay times $<$ 500
Myr (``prompt explosions''), while the double white dwarf channel (C+O
plus He white dwarf) would have longer delay times, as mentioned above.

Successful accretion of hydrogen, leading to growth of a C+O white dwarf up
to the Chandrasekhar mass through steady shell hydrogen and helium burning,
thus requires high accretion rates. That can be achieved for binary stellar
companions at different stages ot their evolution, but if hydrogen
accumulates faster than it can be burned, a red giant--like structure should
form, soon engulfing the companion and leading to a common--envelope stage.
A solution to this problem was found by Hachisu, Kato \& Nomoto (1996):
when the mass accretion rate exceeds the maximum rate at which hydrogen can be
burned, there is no static envelope solution, and the excess material is
blown off in a wind. The optically thick wind solution had been previously
found to explain the light curves of nova outbursts by Kato \& Hachisu (1994).

White dwarfs accreting mass at high rates should emit large amounts of
radiation in the X--ray band, and they should appear as luminous supersoft
X--ray sources (van den Heuvel et al. 1992; Di Stefano \& Nelson 1996;
Yungelson et al. 1996; Kahabka \& van den Heuvel 1997; Li \& van den
Heuvel 1997;  Orio 2006). However, as we will see in Section 7,
that might be in conflict
with the observed X--ray emission of elliptical galaxies and galaxy bulges.

Another possible channel involving a C+O white dwarf plus a non--degenerate
companion star is the core--degenerate scenario recently advocated by Soker
(2013): a Chandrasekhar or super--Chandrasekhar white dwarf is formed
from the merging of a white dwarf with the hot, more massive core of an AGB
star. The initial white dwarf is disrupted and its material accreted by
the AGB core, that leading to the formation of a rapidly spinning, more
massive white dwarf. The delay time till explosion would then be given by
the spin--down time of the new white dwarf. Mergings of a white dwarf with the
core of an AGB star, following a common--envelope episode, had also been
considered as a production mechanism of SNe Ia by Sparks \& Stecher (1974)
and by Livio \& Riess (2003). Soker et al. (2013, 2014) have proposed
the core--degenerate scenario to explain the characteristics of two very
different SNe: PTF11kx and SN 2011fe.

In the preceding, we have not dealt with the especifics of the hydrodynamic
modeling of the different types of explosions surveyed, which has reached
unprecedented standards of realism (see Hillebrandt et al. 2013). They are
being matched by 3D models of the spectra that should arise from the
explosions (Baron, Hauschildt \& Chen 2009).

\section{Constraints on progenitors from DTD}

The Delay Time Distribution (DTD) is given by the time
evolution of the SN rate that would follow an instantaneous
burst of star formation. It is related to the observed rate
$r_{SNe Ia}$ by:
\begin{equation}
r_{SNe Ia} (t) = \int_{0}^{t} R(t - \tau)SFR (\tau) d\tau
\end{equation}
where $R(t)$ is the DTD, $SFR$ is the star formation rate,
and $t$ and $\tau$ are in the SN rest frame (see, for instance,
Ruiz--Lapuente \& Canal 1998).

Early research on SNe Ia rates and DTDs indicated the need of a
two--component model at least: one that could be fitted with a short DTD
population ($\sim10^{8}$ yr) and another one with a long DTD
population (3--4 Gyr) (Scannapieco \& Bildsten 2005; Mannucci et al.
2006; Brandt et al. 2010). Recent studies (Maoz \& Mannucci 2012)
suggest that the DTD peaks at the  shortest times, as a function
$\sim t^{-1}$ (see also Mannucci et al. 2005, and Oemler \& Tinsley 1979).
Such a function characterizes the dominance of double
degenerate mergings. As already mentioned in the previous Section, Badenes
\& Maoz (2012) find that the total merger rate of white dwarf pairs
(for sub--Chandrasekhar WDs)
is similar to the observed SNe Ia rate (see also Ruiter et al. 2011).

The SNe Ia searches in clusters of galaxies at high redshifts (Barbary et al.
2012) have indicated a $t^{\alpha}$ behavior of the rates, with $\alpha$ $=$
-1.41$^{+0.47}_{-0.40}$, which also favors the WD merging channel.
Such best fit value is consistent with measurements of the
late DTD in field galaxies (Totani et al. 2008). Most predictions
for the SD scenario show a steeper late--time DTD
(Greggio 2005; Ruiter et al. 2009; Mennekens et al. 2010),
whith  $\alpha$ ranging from $\alpha$ $=$ -1.6
(Greggio 2005) to $\alpha$ $<$ -3 (Mennekens et al. 2010),
depending on the details of the scenario and on how the binary evolution
is calculated (see,
however, Hachisu et al. 2008, and Pritchet et al. 2008). Recently,
Bonaparte et al. (2013) have computed the cosmic SN Ia rate, for several
cosmic star formation rates and progenitor models, and compared it with
the observational data. No firm conclusions can be derived, concerning the
SN Ia progenitors, but the existence of prompt SNe Ia, exploding within the
first $10^{8}$ yr after the corresponding systems are formed, is required,
althought their fraction should not exceed 15--20\% of the total, to be
consistent with the chemical evolution of the galaxies (see, for an updated
view of this subject, the review by Maoz, Mannucci \& Nelemans 2014).
Also, from the analysis of the environments of 90 Hubble flow SNe Ia discovered
by the {\it Nearby Supernova Factory}, Rigault et al. (2013) find evidence
of two distinct populations with different ages: one associated with current
star formation and another one corresponding to passively evolving
environments.

\section{Carbon and oxygen absorption features at early times}

If the SNe Ia explosions would come from white dwarf mergings,
one would expect to see carbon and oxygen in the early--time spectra,
coming from the surrounding clumps of this material, originated by the merging.
With the access to large numbers of SNe Ia, the {\it SN Factory} has
found C II absorption lines in the spectra of several of them (Thomas
et al. 2011). These authors estimate that 22$^{+10}_{-6}$ $\%$ of SNe Ia
exhibit  C II signatures as late as 5 days before maximum light.
In some  cases one can treat them as spherically symmetric
absorptions, in others as ``carbon blobs''.
In the context of explosions from the merging of two C+O white dwarfs,
the presence of this photospheric carbon at high velocities seems
justified.  Parrent et al. (2011) have studied both the
spherically--symmetric C II absorption and the non--spherically
symmetric cases. Altavilla et al. (2007) found evidence of a C blob
in the normal SN Ia SN 2004dt. Folatelli et al (2012) have also
found evidence of unburnt carbon in SNe Ia from the {\it Carnegie Supernova
Project}, in 30$\%$ of the objects (see Figure 1).

In the case of the normal SN 2011fe, in the M101 galaxy, the availability of
early spectra has allowed to see both C II and O I emissions (Parrent
et al. 2012; Nugent et al. 2011). The
absorption of O I appears at higher velocities, which suggests that SN 2011fe
may have had an appreciable amount of unburned oxygen within the
outer layers of the ejecta. Mazzali et al. (2014), from modeling of the
spectral evolution, find that the high--velocity tail of the ejecta
differs from the predictions of both deflagration and delayed--detonation
models of the explosion.

\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.6\columnwidth]{Fig1.ps}
\caption{Spectrum of SN 2009F at -5 days (black solid line) showing
the C II $\lambda$6580  and $\lambda$7234 lines, and a matching synthetic
spectrum from a model with carbon (dashed line). A synthetic spectrum
from a model without carbon  is shown in dotted lines. (See Folatelli
et al. 2012). (Courtesy of Gaston Folatelli. \copyright AAS. Reproduced with
permission).}
\label{Figure 1}
\end{figure}

Nomoto, Kamiya \& Nakasato (2013) suggest that unburnt C inside
the ejecta might just come from asymmetric SNe Ia explosions, in a
single--degenerate model, for instance, if off--center ignitions take place
(Maeda et al. 2010b). However,
it is also possible that unburnt C would be left inside the ejecta
in explosions coming from mergings of C+O WDs, even from violent ones.
Such carbon would not have been ignited by the detonation that takes place
in such mergings (Hicken et al. 2007; Pakmor et al. 2010; Hillebrandt et al.
2013). In that case, we would have a minimum of $\sim$30 $\%$ of SNe Ia
coming from double--degenerate systems.

It is important to study through spectropolarimetry (Wang and Wheeler 2008;
H\"oflich 1991 ; Jeffery 1989, 1990 ) the asymmetry of the C II and O I
features. Thus far, line asymmetries have been seen in some SNe Ia, such as
SN 2004dt (Wang and Wheeler 2008).

\section{Emission features at late times}

\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.6\columnwidth]{Fig2.ps}
\caption{Chandraskhar models were favored by normal nebular SNe Ia.
Sub-Chandrasekhar He--detonations (Livne \& Arnett 1995) were
largely disfavored (Ruiz--Lapuente 1996. \copyright AAS. Reproduced with
permission).}
\label{Figure 2}
\end{figure}

The merging models of C+O WDs need testing in the nebular phase.
As discussed in R\"opke et al (2012), several properties of the
merging models could be observable in that phase. In general, the
model of (initial) deflagration of a WD when reaching the Chandrasekhar mass
leads to a high degree of neutronization, since burning occurs at
densities higher than $2\times10^{8} g\ cm^{-3}$.
Such neutronization can be seen, for instance, from the nebular emission
of Ni II (coming from the stable isotope $^{58}$Ni). In the violent
merging of two white dwarfs, instead, the burning occurs at peak densities
below $2\times10^{8} g\ cm^{-3}$ (R\"opke et al. 2012), and
nebular emission of stable Ni should not be so prominent. In fact,
the nebular emission of the decay products of $^{56}$Ni
is expected to be asymmetric, both in the single degenerate model and in the
non--violent merging of two C+O WDs, the asymmetry arising from the material
produced by a deflagration initiated off--centre, when the WD reaches the
Chandrasekhar mass. The Ni produced later, in the detonation phase, would
be more symmetrically distributed, instead. Those asymmetries of the nebular
emission by the products of $^{56}$Ni decay have already been seen, according
to Maeda et al. (2010a,b). Maeda et al. (2010a) assert that the nebular
spectra do reveal ignitions offset from the centre of the WD, and
that this is a generic feature of SNe Ia.

A point made by R\"opke et al. (2012) is that, in the violent
merging of C+O WDs, the detonation of the secondary WD, at low densities,
should introduce copious amounts of oxygen in the innermost ejecta. That could
give rise to visible [O I] $\lambda\lambda$ 6300, 6364 \AA.
This has been seen in  SN 2010lp (Kromer et al. 2013a; Taubenberger et al.
2013a), and it gives strong support to that scenario.
A different question (Ruiz-Lapuente 1996) is that, at lower densities, the
[Fe II] and [Fe III] lines are less collisionally excited and become weaker
than what is seen in the data. This was shown for the sub--Chandrasekhar
 edge--lit detonations of Livne \& Arnett (1995) which gave a very poor fit
to the observations, while Chandraskehar models with 0.6 M$\odot$ of $^{56}$Ni
fit very well the data
of normal SNe Ia. The fit to the nebular data for the
new class of sub--Chandrasekhar explosion models remains to be tested, since
the result just mentioned came from the models of He detonations in
sub--Chandrasekhar WDs available in the 90's
(Ruiz--Lapuente 1996, hereafter R96; see Figure 2).

On the other hand, in the models based on Chandrasekhar--mass WDs resulting
from accretion of H from a non--degenerate star, one would
expect to see emission of H at $\lambda$6563 \AA.
Such emission is not seen in normal SNe Ia (Leonard 2007).
Hydrodynamic simulations indicate that seeing the H$\alpha$ emission is
related to the mixing of H with other elements. In a hydrodynamic simulation
for a main--sequence companion to the SN (Liu et al. 2012), up to 19$\%$ of
the total mass of the companion star is stripped by the impact of the SN
ejecta, and those debris should mix with the most slowly moving layers of the
ejecta.

There have been a few SNe Ia with H$\alpha$ in emission.
Such are, for instance, the cases of SN 2002ic (Hamuy et al. 2003),
of SN 2005gj (Aldering et al. 2006), and of PTF11kx (Dilday et al. 2012).
We will address this point in Section 13.2.

\section{Variable blueshifted Na I D features}

As first seen by Patat et al. (2007), some SNe Ia have variable Na I D
absorption lines, significantly  blueshifted with respect to the absorption
features of other elements. This result has been confirmed by Simon et al.
(2009), Sternberg et al. (2011), and Foley et al. (2012) (see Figure 3). The
general
interpretation is that a significant fraction of SNe Ia progenitor systems
have outflows of material previous to the explosion. The Na I D lines arise
from the ionized circumstellar medium (CSM).
Foley et al. (2012) find a correlation with higher velocity ejecta in the
SNe Ia that show blueshifted Na I D line profiles. They suggest the possibility
that progenitor systems with strong outflows tend to have more kinetic
energy per unit mass than those with weak or no outflows.

Patat et al. (2013) have shown that the SN 2011fe was surrounded by a
``clean'' environment, and there is a lack of time--variable blueshifted
absorption
features. They found SN 2011fe consistent with the progenitor being a binary
system with a main--sequence or even a degenerate star.
Nugent et al. (2011) found that the exploding star was likely a C+O WD and,
from the lack of an early shock, that the companion was most likely a
main--sequence star or there is no surviving companion. Li et al. (2011),
from pre--explosion images, also
exclude companions more evolved that subgiants (see Section 9).
Bloom et al. (2012) also find that only degeneracy--supported
compact objects---WDs and neutron stars---are viable as the primary star. With
few caveats, they also restrict the companion (secondary) star
radius to $R_{c} \leq 0.1 R_{\odot}$, that excluding Roche--lobe
overflowing red giant and main--sequence companions to high significance.

It would be interesting to see if, within the sample of SNe Ia
showing C II and O I absorptions, there are cases of outflows. It is tempting
to think that the supernovae with variable Na I D features are connected to
nova precursors and the ones showing C and O in the outermost layers are
connected with mergings of WDs, instead.

Recently, Sternberg et al. (2013) have found that 18\% of the SNe Ia events
show time--variable Na I D features  associated with circumstellar material.
One might tentatively associate them with recurrent novae.

\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.6\columnwidth,angle=-90]{Fig3.ps}
\caption{High--resolution observations of the Na D absorption lines in the
spectrum of SN 2007le (day -5 and subsequent days). Each panel compares
with the previous observation  and also with the first one (dotted lines).
One can see that the Na absorption line, at $\lambda$ 5931.5 \AA, strengthens
with time. (Courtesy of Josh Simon; Simon et al. 2009. \copyright AAS.
Reproduced with permission).}
\label{Figure 3}
\end{figure}

\subsubsection{Recurrent novae as progenitors of SNe Ia}

Recurrent novae are binaries harboring a WD close to
the Chandrasekhar mass. Classical novae are the outcome
of unstable thermonuclear burning in accreting white dwarfs.
Those white dwarfs have typical masses $M \simeq 0.8\ M_{\odot}$.
If the accretion rate and white dwarf mass are high, the
time between flashes can become short enough that the recurrence
can be observed. Due to the large accretion rate and insignificant
mass loss by ejection, it has been proposed that in recurrent novae (RNe)
the white dwarfs may grow to the Chandrasekhar mass and give rise to
SNe Ia (Starrfield et al. 1988;  Schaefer 2010).

Indeed, RNe can be the progenitors of a part of the SNe Ia
that show variable circumstellar Na absorptions.
Amongst recurrent novae, there are those of the U Sco type,
where the donor is a main sequence or subgiant star, and those of the
RS Oph type, where the donor is a red giant.
The supernova PTF11kx,  classified as a SN Ia--CSM for its interaction
with the circumstellar medium, is believed to have a symbiotic recurrent
nova as its progenitor system (Dilday et al. 2012), although it has also been
attributed to a violent prompt merger of a white dwarf with the core of
a massive AGB star by Soker et al. (2013), who also argue that the mass of
the shell surrounding PTF11kx is too high to have been produced by a recurrent
nova. They estimate the hydrogen mass in the shell to be
$M_{sh} > 0.2 M_{\odot}$. Also, L\"u, Yungelson \& Han (2006) have shown that
symbiotic novae are unlikely SNe Ia progenitors, due to their low efficiency
in hydrogen accumulation.

Sahman et al. (2013) suggest that the recurrent nova Cl Aql will become a
SN Ia within 10 Myr. They find that the mass
of the white dwarf is 1.00 $\pm$ 0.14 M$_{\odot}$, and the mass
of the companion is 2.32 $\pm$ 0.19  M$_{\odot}$. The radius of
the latter is 2.07$\pm$ 0.06 R$_{\odot}$. They estimate that
the secondary is a slightly evolved A--type star, and suggest that the
system is rapidly evolving into a supersoft X--ray source.
Patat (2011) sees, in the variable sodium lines of some SNe Ia,
a possible connection with recurrent novae.

Recently, Soraisam \& Gilfanov (2014) have compared the nova statistics for
M31 with the SNe Ia rates. They find that significant mass accumulation, in
the unstable burning regime, is only possible for WDs with masses below 1.25
$M_{\odot}$. More massive WDs do not significantly accumulate mass. Thus, the
final stage of mass growth can not occur at low mass--accretion rates, when
the burning is unstable. Therefore, to be SNe Ia progenitor candidates, the
systems should go into the stable burning regime in the final phases.

\subsubsection{Other wind--blowing systems made of white dwarfs with
main--sequence or subgiant companions}

Systems consisting of a mass--accreting white dwarf and a Roche--lobe filling,
more massive, slightly evolved main--sequence or subgiant star, steadily
burning H, should appear as luminous supersoft X--ray sources (see Section 2).
With varying mass--accretion rates, however, they can also burn H unstably,
at times, and then appear as recurrent novae of the U Sco type. Nomoto et al.
(2002) (see also Hachisu et al. 1999) propose an scenario in which a C+O white
dwarf is formed from a red--giant star with a helium core of $\sim 0.8-2.0\
M_{\odot}$. Following a first common--envelope episode, a helium star results
and then evolves to form a C+O white dwarf of $\sim 0.8-1.1\ M_{\odot}$. A
part of the helium envelope would have been transferred to the main--sequence
companion. The white dwarf would thus accrete and burn a mixture of H and
helium. Depending on the mass--accretion rate, a wind might be blown from the
surface of the white dwarf. It should not be optically thick enough to absorb
all the X--ray emission, but it could, however, absorb a part of the soft X rays
(Hachisu, Kato \& Nomoto 2010; see next Section). It will be intersting to see
whether variable circumstellar material would be observed in this scenario.

\section{ X--ray constraints}

The two different channels to SN Ia explosions, the single--degenerate path
and the double--degenerate one, lead to
very different predictions for the X--ray emission (Gilfanov \& Bogd\'an
2010). Whereas no strong X--ray emission is expected, prior to explosion,
in the merger scenario, in the single--degenerate scenario the
white dwarf that accretes mass from a non--degenerate companion becomes a
source of X--rays for about 10$^{7}$ yr before the explosion.
If the growth in mass of the white dwarf is due to accretion of hydrogen,
followed by steady burning of hydrogen into helium, one expects a
thermonuclear luminosity
\begin{equation}
L_{nuc} \sim \epsilon_{H}X\dot M\ {\rm erg\ s^{-1}}
\end{equation}
where $\epsilon_{H}$ is the energy per unit mass released by hydrogen
burning, $X$ is the hydrogen mass fraction in the accreted material, and
$\dot M$ is the mass--accretion rate. For standard values.
$L_{nuc} \sim 10^{37}$ erg s$^{-1}$, which is more than one order of magnitude
larger than the gravitational energy released by accretion,
$L_{grav} = GM\dot M/R$ ($M$ and $R$ being the mass and radius of the
white dwarf). That sustains a surface temperature of the white dwarf:
\begin{equation}
T_{\rm eff} \simeq
67\left({\dot M\over 5\times10^{-7}M_{\odot}/{\rm yr}}\right)^{1/4}
\left({R_{\rm WD}\over 10^{-2}R_{\odot}}\right)^{-1/2}\ {\rm eV}
\end{equation}
Such sources are observed in the Milky Way and nearby galaxies, and they
are known (see Section 2.2) as supersoft sources
(van den Heuvel et al. 1992; Kahabka \& van den Heuvel 1997).
Gilfanov \& Bogd\'an (2010) report that the observed X--ray flux from
six nearby elliptical galaxies and galaxy bulges is a factor
$\sim$30--50 less than predicted by the accretion scenario, based upon an
estimate of the supernova rate. They conclude that no more than $\sim$
5\% of Type Ia supernovae in early--type galaxies can be produced by white
dwarfs
accreting hydrogen in binary systems. Hachisu, Kato \& Nomoto (2010),
however, suggest that there is, in fact, no inconsistency, since symbiotic
supersoft sources have fluxes $\sim 0.4\times10^{36}$ erg s$^{-1}$ in the
0.3--0.7 kev range. There is also uncertainty in theoretically deriving the
X--ray luminosity of the supersoft sources, due to the still rough atmosphere
models of mass--accreting WDs and to the neglect of absorption of the soft
X--rays by the cool wind material from the companion star.

On the other hand, X--ray emission can inform us about the circumstellar
medium around the SNe Ia (Badenes et al. 2007). In that work, the authors
disfavor optically thick accretion winds from the WD surface. Such
winds would produce large cavities in the interstellar medium (ISM).
The fundamental properties of the seven  supernova remnants (SNRs) of type Ia
of their sample (SN 1885, Kepler, Tycho, SN 1006, 0509-67.5, 0519-69.0, and
N103B) are incompatible with SNR models expanding inside such cavities.
In general, the search for X--ray emission at the time of the supernova
outburst has also provided probes of the circumstellar medium, which so far is
considered to be of low density (Hughes et al. 2007).  Recently,
Rusell \& Immler (2012) have examined 53 SNe Ia observed
with the {\it Swift} X--ray telescope, and their upper limit
to the X-ray emission gives further evidence that the companion
stars in SNe Ia are neither massive nor evolved (post main--sequence),
due to the corresponding limit on wind mass--loss rate inferred. They can
not rule out, instead,
main--sequence star companions, with mass--loss rates $< 10^{-7} M_{\odot}
yr^{-1}$. A double white dwarf system is also
permitted, due to the lack of circumstellar interaction and hence lack of
X--rays there.

The tightest constraint on the progenitor of a SN Ia, coming from
X--ray emission, is that for SN 2011fe (Horesh et al. 2012; Margutti et al.
2012). The X--ray observations yield an upper limit 2$\times$10$^{-9}$
M$_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$ to the mass outflow (assuming a wind velocity
$v_{wind}$ = 100 km s$^{-1}$). As we have seen in
Section 2, accretion at a rate $\sim$ 10$^{-7}$ M$_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$ is
thought to be necessary for stable accretion and nuclear burning on the
surface of a white dwarf (Nomoto 1982). Supersoft sources can achieve those
rates (Kahabka \& van den Heuvel 1997), although the rates can also be
either lower or higher, in these sources. Horesh et al. (2012) analyse the
models of interaction of the wind with the circumstellar material and conclude
that the data from SN 2011fe can rule out a symbiotic system, but not
a main sequence or subgiant mass--donor. The same conclusion is reached from
their analysis of the radio emission (see next Section). Margutti et al. (2012)
also discard symbiotic systems, as well as Roche lobe overflowing subgiants and
main--sequence secondary stars if $\geq$ 1\% of the transferred mass is lost at
the Lagrangian points.

The nearby SN 2014J  has provided a new opportunity to test the presence of
X-ray emission from the pre--explosion X--ray images (Nielsen et al. 2014).
According to these authors, the upper limits from the  {\it Chandra}
X--ray observatory do exclude a classical super--soft source as the progenitor.
Near the Chandrasekhar mass, the effective temperature corresponding to the
stable nuclear burning on the WD surface exceeds 100 eV. For this temperature,
the 3\,$\sigma$ upper limit on the bolometric luminosity is
$\simeq 3.8 \times 10^{37}\ erg\ s^{-1}$, assuming a column density of
hydrogen $N_{H} = 6.9 \times 10^{21}\ cm^{-2}$ and a black body spectrum. That
confidently excludes a classical super--soft source during the final stages
of the mass accumulation by the progenitor. Due to the large absorption, the
{\it Chandra} upper limits are less constraining at lower temperatures. They
do not exclude, therefore, less conventional progenitors, e.g. a WD enshrouded
in an optically thick envelope or wind. Deep X--ray observations of the
post--explosion environment (Margutti et al. 2014) now rule out
single--degenerate progenitors with steady mass loss until the time of the
explosion (the maximum mass spilled by the system should be $\leq$ 1\%), and
do only allow recurrent novae with a recurrence time $<$ 300 yrs, stars where
the mass loss ceases before the explosion, or double WD systems.

From a different angle, there have been, from the start, great expectations
to detect hard X--ray and $\gamma$--ray photons from SN 2014J (Isern et al.
2013; The \& Burrows 2014), since the supernova was close enough to be detected
by {\it INTEGRAL} and  {\it NuSTAR}. It has, indeed, been detected by
{\it INTEGRAL} (Churazov et al. 2014). The line flux suggests that 0.62 $\pm$
0.13 $M_{\odot}$  of radioactive $^{56}$Ni have been synthesized in the core.
 The mass of
the ejecta (from the continuum emission) would be $\sim$ 1.4 $M_{\odot}$
and composed of roughly equal fractions of iron--group and intermediate--mass
elements. There is thus agreement with the model of the explosion of a
Chandrasekhar--mass WD. Diehl et al. (2014) find that about 0.06
M$_{\odot}$ of $^{56}$Ni should be at the outskirts of the ejecta. This has
suggested that He accreted by the white dwarf could have exploded in the
external layers and triggered the central ignition.

\section{Radio emission}

The lack of radio emission from Type Ia supernovae has been useful
in discarding one type of single--degenerate path as a major contributor:
SNe Ia from
symbiotic systems. In symbiotic systems, the white dwarf accretes mass from
the wind of a giant or AGB companion. The wind accretion should produce
radio emission when the SN ejecta interact with the circumstellar environment
created by such systems. Panagia et al. (2006) set upper limits on mass--loss
rates of $\sim$ 10$^{-7}$ M$_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$. Hancock et al (2011)
suggest upper limits, to the average mass--loss rate of the companion by
stellar wind, of $1.3\times10^{-7} M_{\odot} yr^{-1}$. These authors say that
such limit is inconsistent with SNe Ia in which the accretion comes
from intermediate or high--mass companions. Instead, a main sequence star
having fast winds ($\>>$ 10 km $^{-1}$) could remain undetected, even with
much higher mass--loss rates.

The nearby supernova SN 2011fe has made possible the most sensitive radio
study of a SN Ia made up to now (Chomiuk et al. 2012). The data set direct
constraints to the density of the surrounding medium at radii
$\sim 10^{15}-10^{16}$ cm, that implying an upper limit on the mass--loss rate
from the progenitor system of
$\dot{M} \lesssim 6\times 10^{-10}\ {{M}_{\odot }\ yr^{-1}}$ (assuming a
wind speed of 100 km s$^{-1}$), or expansion inside a uniform CSM with
density $\lesssim$ 6 cm$^{-3}$. Drawing from the observed
properties of non--conservative mass transfer in accreting white dwarfs,
they use the limits on the density of the circumstellar environment to
exclude a good fraction of the parameter space of possible progenitor systems
of SN 2011fe. A symbiotic progenitor system can be ruled out, as well as any
other system characterized by a high mass--transfer rate onto the white dwarf
which could give rise to optically thick accretion winds. Assuming that a
small fraction, $\sim$ 1\% of the mass transferred, is lost from the
progenitor system, they can also eliminate much of the parameter space
occupied by potential progenitors such as recurrent novae or, alternatively,
progenitors undergoing
stable nuclear burning. They eliminate, therefore, for SN 2011fe, a large
fraction of the parameter space associated with popular single--degenerate
progenitor models, leaving only a limited region, mostly inhabited by some
double degenerate systems, as well as by exotic single degenerates in which a
sufficient time delay takes place between mass accretion and SN explosion.

The even closer SN 2014J has also been observed in radio with the VLA,
without any detection (Chandler \& Marvil 2014).  This points out to a
surrounding medium of low density as well.

\section{Limits from pre--explosion images}

It has been possible to put constraints on the
progenitors from  pre--explosion images in other galaxies.
This endeavour has been of particular interest for SN 2011fe, since
it exploded in the galaxy M101, at 6.4 Mpc only. Another nine SNe Ia
with preexisting {\it HST} data on their host galaxies have also been close
enough (within 25 Mpc) to search for the progenitors. It has only been possible
to set upper limits which rule out normal stars with initial masses
larger than 6 M$_{\odot}$ at the tip of the AGB branch,
young post--AGB stars with initial masses larger than 4 M$_{\odot}$, and
post--red--giant stars with initial masses above 9 M$_{\odot}$
(Li et al. 2011a).

The case of SN 2011fe arose great expectations, since the SN was
much closer than in previous occasions. There was, however, no object
seen at the location of the supernova in pre--explosion images,
down to magnitude 27.4 (in the ACS/F435W band) (Li et al. 2011a).
The conclusion of the analysis is that, for SN 2011fe, the red giant
progenitor is excluded, while  a subgiant or a main--sequence companion star
still are possible progenitors, from the imaging approach.

Very recently, the nearby supernova SN 2014J in M82 has been tested in the same
way. This supernova is only at 3.5 Mpc. Elias--Rosa, Greggio \& Botticella
(2014) have analyzed deep archival {\it HST} WFC3/IR images
of M82 in the F110W and F160W filters, taken in Jan. 2010, and used them in an
attempt to identify a progenitor for the SN, by registering the {\it HST}
images
with images of the SN taken on Jan. 23 2014. As in the SN 2011fe case,
they can again exclude a red--giant companion. The limits are
consistent with the companion being (if not another WD) a subgiant or a
main--sequence star. Goobar et al (2014) have also explored the {\it HST}
images of the  explosion region. The observational limits, however are not as
constraining here as in the case of SN 2011fe.

\section{Seeing the companion through the early light curve}

\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.6\columnwidth]{Fig4.ps}
\caption{Differences in the early light curve of a SN Ia, depending
on the nature of the companion star, from Kasen (2010). Four possible
progenitor scenarios are modelled: a RG companion at a distance $a = 2
\times 10^{13}$ cm (green lines); a 6 M$_{\odot}$ MS companion at
$ a = 2 \times  10^{12}$ cm (blue lines); a 2 M$_{\odot}$ MS companion at
$a = 5 \times 10^{11}$ cm (red lines), and the lack of companion
(black lines). (Courtesy of Dan Kasen. \copyright AAS. Reproduced with
permission).}

\label{Figure 4}
\end{figure}

According to Kasen (2010), the impact of the supernova debris on
the companion produces a bright X--ray (0.1--2 keV) burst lasting from minutes
to hours. The diffusion of this X--ray emission gives rise to a longer--lasting
optical/UV emisson which exceeds the radioactively powered emission from the
supernova for the first few days after the explosion. This effect can be seen
in Figure 4. The signatures are prominent for viewing angles
looking down upon the shocked region, which should be about a 10\% of the
times.  Kasen (2010) concludes that the current optical and UV data do
effectively constrain the red giant companion channel, disfavoring it.

Zheng et al. (2014) (see their Figure 3), have presented very early
light--curve data from SN 2014J. When comparing them with the predictions of
Kasen (2010), the non--companion case appears favored.

High--z searches might provide the tightest constraint on the SN progenitors.
Goldhaber et al. (2001) show, in their Figure 1, the light curves of 35
high--z SNe Ia found by the {\it Supernova Cosmology Project (SCP)}. These
data, as well as  more recent ones (Conley et al. 2006;
Hayden et al. 2010; Bianco et al. 2012) do not show any evidence for a
companion in the early light curves of high--z SNe Ia samples. Hayden et
al. (2010), from a simulation of the shock interaction with a companion, rule
stars with masses larger that 6 M$_{\odot}$ and also disfavour red--giant
companions.

\section{Search for companion stars of SNe Ia in our Galaxy and in the LMC}

Another method to identify the progenitors of the SNe Ia was proposed by
Ruiz--Lapuente (1997): to inspect the stars within the innermost regions of
the Galactic SNe Ia remnants in search of the mass--donor star (to either
find it or to show its absence), in the area where it should still remain
after the explosion, moving with a peculiar velocity gained from the orbital
velocity in the binary system before the explosion. A given star, to be
candidate to donor in a SN Ia explosion, should be at the distance of the
remnant, moving with enhanced velocity, and maybe also show signs of
contamination by the iron--peak rich part of the supernova ejecta. A subgiant
named Tycho G was found to be a likely candidate companion for SN 1572
(Ruiz--Lapuente et al. 2004), since it is close to centre of the SNR, at a
distance compatible with that of the remnant, and it is in a region where
stars follow the rotational pattern of the Galaxy, but it has a radial
velocity well above the 20 to 40 km s$^{-1}$, typical at the distance of
SN 1572. It also has a high proper motion. A chemical analysis of the star
showed enhancement of Ni in the surface (Gonz\'alez Hern\'andez et al. 2009),
suggesting contamination by the supernova ejecta. That was disputed by
Kerzendorf et al. (2009, 2013), who  argued that all those characteristics
might just correspond to a chance interloper. Based on greatly improved proper
motion measurements and a more refined chemical analysis, Bedin et al. (2014),
however, have shown that the probability of having found such an interloper at
random is extremely low.

Schaefer \& Pagnotta (2012) have looked as well for a companion star in
a SNR of the LMC (SNR 0509--67.5) and found no star that could have been the
mass--donor in the progenitor system. Their result points to the supernova
having resulted from merging of two white dwarfs. In addition, Edwards,
Pagnotta \& Schaefer (2012) have examined the innermost area of the remnant
SNR 0519--69.0, also in the LMC, and eliminated red giants,
subgiants, and He stars as possible companions of the SN.

Gonz\'alez Hern\'andez et al. (2012) (see also Kerzendorf et al. 2012) have
inspected the remnant of the Galactic
SN 1006, determining distances and chemical abundances for all candidate stars
within the innermost 27\% of the area of the remnant. The lack of detection
of any viable candidate star rules out red giant and subgiant stars, as well
as any star brighter than M$_{V}$ $\sim$ +4.9 (approximately equal, or
slightly less than the solar luminosity).

The key point, from the theoretical point of view, is that all groups that
have simulated the impact of the ejecta of a supernova on its companion star
(Marietta, Burrows \& Fryxell 2000; Pakmor et al. 2008; Pan, Ricker \&
Taam 2012a; Liu et al. 2012, 2013) consistently find that the companion
survives the explosion. This important conclusion is the basis for the
observational searches.

There has been debate on whether the surviving companion of
a WD plus main sequence system, or a WD plus subgiant system,
would show rapid rotation after the explosion (Gonz\'alez Hern\'andez et al.
2009; Kerzendorf et al. 2009, 2013; Bedin et al. 2014).
Hydrodynamic simulations by Pan, Ricker \& Taam  (2012a), for main sequence
companions, show that they would lose about half of their initial angular
momentum, their rotational velocity dropping to a quarter of the original
rotational velocity. The simulations by Liu et al. (2012), also for a companion
on the main sequence, equally show that its rotational velocity  can be
significantly reduced by the effects of the impact of the SN ejecta, falling
to a 32\%--14\% of its pre--explosion value, due to remotion of 55\%--89\%
of the initial angular momentum, taken away by the material stripped during
the interaction with the supernova ejecta. It is easy to see (Fig. 1 of
Marietta, Burrows \& Fryxell 2000, for instance) that, in the case of a
1.1 M$_{\odot}$ subgiant, remotion of $\sim0.15 M_{\odot}$ by the impact of
the ejecta means reducing the radius of the star, immediately after the
impact, to about 1/3 of its previous value only (in front of about 1/2 in
the main sequence case), so the drop in rotational veocity must be
correspondly larger.

In their simulations, Pan, Ricker \& Taam (2012a) find that the contamination
with Ni in the companion star, from the passage of the SN ejecta, is of $\sim
10^{-5} M_{\odot}$, for a main sequence star, and of $\sim 10^{-8} M_{\odot}$
for a red giant.

Another point concerns the luminosity to be expected, for the surviving
companions of recent SNe Ia. Podsiadlowski (2003) found that, in the case
of a subgiant, the star, 10$^{3}$--10$^{4}$ yr after the explosion, might be
either significantly overluminous or underluminous, that depending on the
amount of heating and the amount of mass stripped, as well as on the previous
binary mass transfer. More recently, Shappee, Kochanek \& Stanek (2013) have
claimed that, in the case of a main sequence companion (and maximizing the
heating), the object should remain significantly overluminous for the above
time lapse, but the more realistic simulations of Pan, Ricker \& Taam
(2012b), also for a main--sequence star, predict luminosities much closer to
that of Tycho G, $\sim500$ yr after the explosion. In the case of a subgiant,
a larger fraction of the material should be directly stripped by the shock
wave generated by the impact of the SN ejecta, and there should be less heating
of the fraction of the envelope that remains bound.

In all the preceding considerations, it has been implicitly assumed that
there is no significant delay between the accretion phase that brings the white
dwarf to the Chandrasekhar mass and the SN explosion. That has been questioned
by Di Stefano, Voss \& Claeys (2011), who propose a model in which the
C+O white dwarf, spun--up by accretion of matter and angular momentum, is
able to sustain a mass above the Chandrasekhar mass, and only reaches the
conditions for explosive C burning when it has lost enough angular momentum,
on a time scale that may be long enough to allow the companion star to evolve
to the white dwarf stage. Also, overcoming the Chandrasekhar--mass limit
would allow exhaustion of the envelope of the companion star, only its compact
core remaining at the end of the mass--transfer phase. Based on that, Di
Stefano \& Kilic (2012) argue that the lack of evidence of ex--companion star
in the above mentioned SNR 0509--67.5 does not mean that such companion does
not exist, since it could have become a C+O or a He white dwarf by the time of
the explosion. The problem of the time scale of spin down of the primary white
dwarf has been very recently addressed by Meng \& Podsiadlowski (2013), who
obtain an upper limit of a few 10$^{7}$ yr. Such times would still allow a
companion star to become dimmer than the upper limit set by Schaefer \&
Pagnotta (2012), according to Di Stefano and Kilic (2012).

Another remnant being now studied is the Kepler SNR (SN 1604). From the lack of
bright stars in the field, Kerzendorf et al. (2014) have ruled out red
giants as possible companions of SN 1604. VLT observations with FLAMES of the
stars in  more than 20\% of the inner core of the SNR have now been granted
(Ruiz--Lapuente et al. 2014). It will be very interesting to see what
high--resolution spectra reveal. Other fairly symmetrical Galactic SNR are
planned to undergo a similar scrutiny

\section{SN Ia candidates from orbit reconstruction}

Another approach to dilucidate the progenitors of SNe Ia is to reconstruct
the orbit of systems containing a WD. Along these lines, the tight binary
system CD--30$^{0}$ 11223 has been found to consist of a C+O white dwarf
plus  a hot helium star (Geier et al. 2013). The system turns out to be a
progenitor candidate for the double detonation SN Ia scenario (see Section
2.2). Wang \& Han (2012) have studied this kind of possible progenitor
system (see also Wang et al. 2009). A C+O white dwarf is first formed, from
the initially more massive star, and the system then is in a close orbit. The
mass donor later reaches Roche--lobe overflow and becomes a He star, but
evolves, after exhaustion of the central He, to the red giant stage. The
system thus becomes a C+O WD plus a He red giant. The mechanism can also work
with the He star still staying in the main sequence phase. Fink, Hillebrandt
\& R\"opke (2007) reproduce, in a 3D simulation of a double detonation, these
explosions. They find that the He detonation in a shell succesfully  gives
rise to a second detonation in the C+O core. In the outcome, $^{56}$Ni masses
about 0.40--0.45 M$_{\odot}$ are produced, with rapidly expanding
$^{56}$Ni in the outer layers.  They note, however, the lack of observations of
this type of explosion (SN 1991T could resemble it, but the core
contained 0.8 M$_{\odot}$ of $^{56}$Ni).

A C+O WD plus a He donor could, instead, be the progenitor of the
so--called ``Type .Ia'' supernovae. We do not include these in our physical
diagram for SNe Ia, however, since their likely He features at maximum (Kasiwal
et al. 2010, and references therein) rule them out as possible SNe Ia (we
only consider, in this paper, the types of explosions, either total or
partial, that by their features at maximum can be regarded to be such).

\section{Outliers from the brightness--decline rate relation and the bulk
of SNe Ia}

From the many systematic searches made at various redshifts, it
has been possible to identify SNe Ia that fall well away from the Phillips
(1993, 1999) relationship between the peak luminosiy and the rate of
decline of the light curve. Such relationship was traditionally related
to the amount of $^{56}$Ni synthesized in Chandrasekhar--mass models, since its
variation not only correlated with that of the maximum luminosity, but it also
produced opacity variation in the envelope of the SN, which resulted in
slower decline rates of the light curve for larger Ni masses. In such view
(H\"oflich \& Khokhlov 1996; Pinto \& Eastman 2000; Bravo et al. 2009), only
variations among Chandrasekhar--mass WD explosions  were the cause
of the relationship.  A new proposal, which completely changes the
explanation, is to assume that the Phillips relationship results from
variation in the viewing angle of the family of detonations of merging
sub--Chandrasekhar explosions (Moll et al. 2013). That marks a new turn in the
search for the physical basis of a relationship that is crucial for
cosmology, and it thus calls for further investigation. Since this is relevant
for cosmology, we mention that the method of
determination of H$_{0}$ using nebular spectra of SNe Ia (Ruiz--Lapuente 1996)
favored a value of 68 km $\pm$ 7 (stat) $\pm$ 1 (updated systematic error)
km  s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$, in good agreement with the
latest results from the {\it Planck} satellite (Ade et al. 2013). The  light
curves of SNe Ia (H\"oflich \& Khokhlov 1996) favored 67 $\pm$ 9 km s$^{-1}$
Mpc$^{-1}$ (also in agreement with {\it Planck}). Riess et al. (2011), within
the {\it SH0ES} program, had found $H_{0} = 73.8 \pm 2.4$ km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$,
in tension with the {\it Planck} result (but see, more recently, Riees 2014).

\subsection{Super-Chandrasekhar SNe Ia}

A few discoveries of highly luminous ($M_{V} \sim$ -20.4) SNe Ia suggest
the existence of super--Chandrasekhar mass explosions (Howell et al. 2006).
These supernovae show very slowly evolving Si II $\lambda$ 6355 \AA \
absorption velocity, and they can also show a plateau in their blue light
curve (Scalzo et. al. 2012). The very large mass of $^{56}$Ni  needed to
explain those events can plausibly be produced by the collision of two white
dwarfs (Raskin et al. 2010) or by accretion on a rapidly rotating C+O WD. The
{\it SN Factory} has tried to evaluate the percentage of super--Chandrasekhar
SNe Ia, and they suggest about 2\% (Aldering 2011). A super--Chandraskhar WD
can be formed if it is supported by rapid rotation (Hachisu 1986; see also
Section 10), and the rotating WD is more massive than a non--rotating WD with
the same central density (Yoon \& Langer 2005). For a given  central density,
the density profile is shallower for those more massive WDs, and therefore the
mass contained within the density range for $^{56}$Ni production is larger.
Also, for the same central density, a flame produces more $^{56}$Ni due to
less pre--expansion ahead of the propagating flame. In the case of merging,
one can have tamped detonations (Howell et al. 2006). Those tamped detonations
in rapidly rotating WDs can synthesize amounts of $^{56}$Ni as high as 1.6--2
M$_{\odot}$. Taubenberger et al. (2011) have estimated that the total mass
of the WD, in the case of SN 2009dc, was $\sim2.8 M_{\odot}$, and the ejected
$^{56}$Ni mass was $\sim1.8 M_{\odot}$.

The fact that some of those events show C II absorption features in their
spectra reinforces the hypothesis that they come from mergings of two WDs.

On the other hand, from modeling (Hillebrandt et al. 2013) of the violent WD
merger scenario (Pakmor et al. 2010), it seems unlikely that these supernovae
would come from violent double--degenerate mergers. The $^{56}$Ni mass
produced only depends on the mass of the primary WD, there. Since exploding
C+O WDs, in the violent merger model, usually have masses well below 1.3
M$_{\odot}$ (Ruiter et al. 2013), that limits the amount of $^{56}$Ni produced
in the explosion to $\sim1 M_{\odot}$ only. However, recent analyses of the
nebular spectra of super--Chandrasekhar events (Taubenberger et al. 2013a),
the case of SN 2009dc in particular, indicate that those outbursts can be
explained by a merger of two massive C+O white dwarfs, producing
$\sim$ 1 M$_{\odot}$ of $^{56}$Ni and $\sim$ 2 M$_{\odot}$ of ejecta. That
would come from the explosion of a Chandrasekhar--mass white dwarf, enshrouded
by 0.6--0.7 M$_{\odot}$ of C+O--rich material.

\subsection{Supernovae strongly interacting with the CSM}

\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.6\columnwidth]{Fig5.ps}
\caption{Spectroscopic evolution of SN 2002ic (see Hamuy et al. 2003).
The spectra were taken at Las Campanas Observatory. In panel a, the evolution
for +6, +10, +34, +47, and +70 days from estimated maximum light is shown. The
top spectrum displays the Si II $\lambda$ 6355 \AA\ feature typical of the
SNe Ia class, as well as prominent Fe III absorption features at
$\lambda\lambda$ 4200 and 4900 \AA. In panel b, a comparison of the spectrum
of SN 2002ic at the epoch +6 days from maximum with a spectrum of
SN 1991T, obtained at the +4 days epoch, shows similarity, except for the
H$\alpha$ emission, which is not present in SN 1991T.
(Courtesy of Mario Hamuy. \copyright Nature Publishing Group.
Reproduced with permission).}

\label{Figure 5}
\end{figure}

There is a fraction of supernovae which show  narrow hydrogen
emission lines. They were first noticed by Hamuy et al. (2003), in
SN 2002ic (see Figure 3). Such SN have been labelled in various ways, until
recently being dubbed SNe Ia--CMS (Silverman et al. 2013). The existence of
the SN Ia--CSM class of objects seems to indicate that at least some SNe Ia
do arise
from the SD channel, since a H--rich CSM can form during the evolution of SD
systems. Hamuy et al. (2003) suggest that SN 2002ic could have arised from
a binary system containing a C+O white dwarf plus a massive (3--7 $M_{\odot}$)
AGB star, where the total mass loss in H can reach a few solar masses,
since their analysis of the  narrow component of H$\alpha$ implies a high
mass--loss rate of $\sim10^{-2.4} M_{\odot} yr^{-1}$ (see Figure 5).
The accreted mass would come from the wind of the AGB star, partially captured
by the WD. Despite the mass--loss rate being so high, however, the supernova
has not been detected in radio.

Dilday et al (2012) find that the supernova PTF11kx is of Type Ia, and
suggest a symbiotic nova progenitor (see, however, Soker et al. 2013). Its
late--time spectrum confirms that
it is, indeed, a SN Ia. A time series of high--resolution spectra of this
supernova reveals  a complex circumstellar environment, with multiple
shells similar to those ejected by Nova RS Ophiuchi.
Dilday et al. (2012) found, from the {\it Palomar Transient Factory (PTF)},
that the SN Ia--CSM are about 0.1--1\% of all SNe Ia. This is more or
less consistent with the theoretical expectations for the fraction of SNe Ia
from the symbiotic progenitor channel: between 1 and 30\% (Han et al. 2004;
L\"u et al. 2009).

Concerning other typical characteristics, SNe Ia--CSM have peak absolute
magnitudes in the range  --21.3 $\leq M_{R} \leq$ --19 mag, with relatively
long rise times of $\sim20$--40 days. They do not emit neither in radio nor
at X--ray wavelengths.

\subsection{Types of subluminous SNe Ia}

\subsubsection{SNe Ia of the SN 1991bg--type}

SN 1991bg came as a suprise, being a subluminous SN Ia, one
order of magnitude fainter than normal SNe Ia (Filippenko et al. 1992;
Leibundgut et al. 1993; Ruiz--Lapuente et al. 1993). The amount
of $^{56}$Ni synthesized was only about 0.07 $M_{\odot}$ (Ruiz--Lapuente
et al. 1993). It is clearly out of the Phillips relation. Later, there
were many more discoveries of this type, and one could start to think of a
SN 1991bg--class. Li et al. (2011b) quantify this class as 15\% of all
SNe Ia.

Pakmor et al. (2011) suggest that violent mergers of WDs with a
primary of 0.9 M$_{\odot}$  reproduce very well the 1991bg--like
SN. Indeed, the simulated optical light curves fit well the data (Hillebrandt
et al. 2013). Very recently, the presence of
[O I] $\lambda\lambda$6300, 6364 emission in the nebular spectrum of
SN 2010lp, suggesting that oxygen is distributed in a non--spherical
region close to the centre of the SN ejecta, has also been interpreted as
the result of a violent merger (Taubenberger et al. 2013b).

\subsubsection{Ca--rich transients}

\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.6\columnwidth,angle=-90]{Fig6.ps}
\caption{Evolution of a Ca--rich transient. It looks like a normal SN Ia at
maximum, but it develops a Ca--dominated nebular spectrum. (Courtesy
of Mansi Kasliwal; Kasliwal et al. 2012. \copyright AAS. Reproduced with
permission).}
\label{Figure 6}
\end{figure}

These events do exhibit unusually strong Ca features at nebular phases,
while they look as spectroscopically normal SNe Ia at maximum. Their
distribution within their host galaxies shows great similarity with that of
the SNe Ia and indicate old progenitor systems (Lyman et al. 2013). According
to these authors, they are consistent with helium--shell detonations on
low--mass C+O  white dwarfs. The objects display low peak luminosities,
fast photometric evolution, high ejecta velocities, strong Ca emission lines,
and they are located in the extreme outskirts of their host galaxies (Kasliwal
et al. 2012; see Figure 6).

\subsubsection{Type  Iax supernovae}

\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.6\columnwidth,angle=-90]{Fig7.ps}
\caption{Inhomogenety of the properties of SNIax. (Courtesy of Gautham
Narayan; Narayan et al. 2011. \copyright AAS. Reproduced with permission).}
\label{Figure 7}
\end{figure}

Foley et al. (2013) identify a new subclass of supernovae called Type Iax.
They have low maximum velocities (2000 $\lesssim v \lesssim$ 8000 km $^{-1}$),
and typically low peak magnitudes (--14.2  $\gtrsim M_{V,peak} \gtrsim$
--18.9 mag). In fact, this is the same family of SNe Ia identified by Li et
al. (2003) and dubbed SN 2002cx--like SNe Ia. Foley et al. (2013) find that
this subclass comprises 31$^{+17}_{-13}$\%. of all  SNe Ia. White et al (2014),
however, reduce it to 5.6$^{+17}_{-3.7}$. Given the large uncertainty, in
Figure 9 we have plotted an average of the two estimates.

Those SN2002--cx (or SN Iax) events exhibit iron--rich spectra at early
phases, like SN 1991T (see Ruiz--Lapuente et al. 1991 for the iron--rich
spectra of SN 1991T), a luminosity as low as events like SN 1991bg (i.e. 2
mag below normal Type Ia), and expansion velocities roughly half those of
normal SNe Ia. This subclass has a small $^{56}$Ni production, as seen at late
phases. They move fast into the nebular phase, that giving evidence of the
small total mass ejected. A survey of the models able to produce such kind of
explosions suggests objects made of a  0.6 M$_{\odot}$ C+O WD, with a
layer of $\sim 0.17  M_{\odot}$ of He on top, which undergo a He detonation
(Li et al. 2003; Wang, Justham \& Han 2013). The origin of the subclass is
still under debate, however, because it is quite inhomogeneous (Narayan et al.
2011). White et al. (2014) divide it in two subclasses: the
``SN 2002--cx--like'' and the ``SN 2002-- es--like'' SNe Ia. The former tend
to appear in later--type or more irregular hosts, have more varied and
generically dimmer luminosities, longer rise times, and they lack a Ti II
through in their spectra, when compared to the latter.

The frequency of SN 2002cx events, as compared with normal and SN 1991bg--like
events, has also been estimated by Perets et al. (2010). Variants of SN 2002cx
events are seen in faint supernovae such as SN 2008ha (Foley et al. 2009,
2010). This last
supernova is the faintest member of its subclass. Its late--time photometry is
consistent with the production of just a few times 10$^{-3}$ M$_{\odot}$ of
$^{56}$Ni, similar to the estimates from the early light curve (Foley et al.
2009). The small ejecta and $^{56}$Ni masses are consistent with a failed
deflagration of a WD, that did not disrupt the progenitor (Jordan et al. 2012;
Kromer et al. 2013a). There is still another model, proposed earlier, for this
particular Type Iax supernova: it is the fallback of a core--collapse
supernova (Moriya et al. 2010). This model, then, does not treat SN 2008ha as a
thermonuclear supernova, but as the collapse of a C+O star of 13M$_{\odot}$
(model 13CO2 in their paper). The boundary between the fallback region and the
ejecta is determined by whether the velocity of the region exceeds the escape
velocity or not. Lyman et al. (2013), argue that the host environments and
morphologies point to a generally younger population for this subclass.
A model which synthesizes 0.003 M$_ {\odot}$ of $^{56}$Ni and ejects
0.074 M$_{\odot}$ of material seems to reproduce the spectra and light curve
of SN 2008ha.  Foley et al. (2013) find the environment of some of
these Type Iax SN to be typical of old progenitor systems. They discuss that
the  most
significant reason for their classification of SN 2008ha as a SN Ia is the
presence of signatures of the products of thermonuclear processing of C+O, in
particular that of sulfur lines, with an intensity that is only typical of
SNe Ia (Foley et al. 2009). Very recently, Foley et al. (2014) report
the possible detection of the stellar donor of SN 2008ha in images
from the {\it HST}. Different possibilities for the progenitor remain open,
though the age is constrained to be $<$ 80 Myr.

Thus, while Type Iax SNe, fall well below
the Phillips relation,  some of these events
should be regarded as subluminous SNe Ia, which might
be linked either to He detonations in a shell or to failed deflagrations.
Others might originate in core--collapse.
The diversity of the events (see Figures 7, 8) suggests that several
mechanisms take place within the sample of SNe Iax,
explaining the properties of the different observed events.

\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.6\columnwidth]{Fig8.ps}
\caption{The $M_{B}$ $vs$ $\Delta m_{15} (B)$
diagram using the CfA3 sample of 185 SNe Ia (Hicken et al. 2009).
The solid line is the Phillips et al. (1999) relation.
The fundamental relation developed by Phillips (1993) was
modified in Phillips et al. (1999).
The figure is adapted from Hillebrandt et al. (2013), and
we  use the same sources for superluminous and 91bg-like
subluminous events. The diversity of Type Iax is taken from
Narayan et al. (2011). The area of the Ca--rich transients
is marked on the diagram, following  Kasliwal  et al. (2012).
The data on the luminous fast--evolving SNe Ia come from
Perets et al. (2011).
The proportion in Nature of the different events is
tentatively given in Figure 9.
}

\label{Figure 8}
\end{figure}

\subsection{Rapidly declining SNe Ia}

Perets et al. (2010, 2011a,b; Poznanski et al. 2010) have identified
a new subclass of SNe Ia: rapidly declining SNe, such as SN 1885A,
1939C, and 2002bj, that, unlike the Iax subtype, are not faint.
SN 2002bj had a short rise time ($<$ 7 days) and $\Delta m_{15}(B)
\sim 3.2$, which is a post--maximum decline much faster than that of
the bulk of SNe Ia ($\Delta m_{15} (B) < 1.7$), and even faster than
that of SN 1991bg--like events ($1.7 < \Delta m_{15}(B) < 2$). However,
it reached a peak magnitude $M_{B} = -18.5$, which is not faint.

SN 1885A and 1939C arose in old environments, which points to also
old WDs as their progenitors. In the case of SN 2002bj, the ejected
mass appears to be low ($M_{ej} < 0.15 M_{\odot}$), that being consistent
with the estimated mass of the SN 1885A remnant. Perets et al. (2011b)
evaluate the frequency of the SNe in this subclass as being at least
1--2\% of the global SNe Ia rate. Helium--shell detonations have been
suggested as the explosion mechanism (Perets et al. 2010, 2011a; Poznanski
et al. 2010), but its consistency with the observations still remains an
open question.

 \section{The bulk of SNe Ia: cosmological SNe Ia}

\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.6\columnwidth]{Fig9.ps}
\caption{Histogram showing the approximate percentages of SNe Ia subtypes.
The overluminous super--Chandrasekhar SNe Ia may come from non--violent DD
mergings. The small numbers of SN attributed either to symbiotic systems or
to the core--degenerate scenario, those showing unburnt C in their spectra
(likely coming from DD mergers), plus those most likely having main sequence
stars as mass donors, together with the very fast evolving SNe Ia, have
standard luminosities. The SN 1991bg and the SN Iax subtypes are
underluminous. The large error bars concerning the fraction of SN of the
SN Iax subtype (not shown in the Figure; see text) imply, of course,
additional uncertainties on the percentages of the other subtypes, not
affecting the relative distribution of percentages amongst them, though.
Ca--rich transients are not included, because they are too faint to be
considered SNe Ia}

\label{Figure 9}
\end{figure}

It has been presented in section 6 that a significant fraction (18\%)
of the population of SNe Ia show time--variable Na I D features,
other features being variable as well. Those supernovae are normal SNe Ia, as
the ones that we use for cosmology. Their characteristics point to recurrent
novae (Patat 2011) or to systems with significant outflows prior to explosion,
as progenitors. Another chunk of the normal (cosmological) SNe Ia likely
comes from double--degenerate systems ($\sim$ 30\%), as suggested by the
unburnt C and O in the outermost layers (see section  4).

One might ask: how can cosmological SNe Ia have two different
origins? The reason is that in both cases the whole C+O WD is burnt,
giving rise to the light curve whose variation in peak magnitude is
due to the amount of $^{56}$Ni synthesized in the explosion, and the
line opacity of those events modulates their rate of decline to give
$M(B)_{\rm max} = M(B)_{\rm 1.1} + 0.786[\Delta m_{\rm 15}(B) -1.1]
 - 0.663[\Delta m_{\rm 15}(B) -1.1]^{2}$,
where $M(B)_{\rm 1.1}$ is the absolute blue magnitude, at maximum, of a
SN Ia with $\Delta m_{\rm 15} = 1.1\ {\rm mag}$ (Phillips et al. 1999).
This relation extends the possibility of using SNe Ia with
$\Delta m_{\rm 15}$ high, since they are seen to make a continuum with
the slower ones.
Scalzo et al. (2014) derive, from the bolometric light curves
of a sample of SNe Ia obtained by the {\it SNFactory}, a range of both
ejected masses and $^{56}$Ni masses. Ejected masses would range, for
normal SNe Ia, from 0.9 M$_{\odot}$ for the fastest decliners to 1.4
M$_{\odot}$ for the slowest ones. The 91T--like SNe Ia eject masses in
excess of 1.4  M$_{\odot}$ and produce $^{56}$Ni masses around 0.8--1.0
M$_{\odot}$. The middle part of the sample is occupied by SNe Ia with
Chandrasekhar--mass ejecta and producing 0.6  M$_{\odot}$ of $^{56}$Ni
(as derived from the nebular spectra of SNe Ia in R96).

It has been argued (Dom\'{i}nguez et al. 2001) that evolutionary effects
in the maximum--brightness--rate of decline relation could make
difficult the use of SN Ia at very high $z$. Branch et al. (2001) propose
an strategy to test evolutionary effects, in the prospect of a space mission
devoted to the study of dark energy by means of high--$z$ SNe Ia. Their
proposed plan, now completed for large samples of nearby SNe Ia, is to
study all possible evolutionary effects in SNe Ia samples at low z.
Such effects have now been evaluated from big samples, and it has been shown
that they do not to interfere with our understanding of dark energy
(Ruiz--Lapuente 2007). The SNe Ia at $z$ = 1.914 (Jones et al. 2013),
at  $z$ = 1.71 (Rubin et al. 2013), and at $z$= 1.55 (Rodney et al. 2012)
look normal and show no evolutionary effects. Concerning cosmology, it has
been seen that these highest-z observations do suppport the $\Lambda CDM$
model of our Universe (see also Conley et al. 2011; Sullivan et al. 2011).

We have learned a lot about normal (cosmological) SNe Ia from the two
recent nearby SNe Ia: SN 2011fe and SN 2014J. For the first one,
the {\it HST} deep images have allowed to discard many single--degenerate
scenarios (Li et al. 2011a,b). SN 2011fe showed unburnt C and O in the very
early spectra. One possible explanation is that it came from a
double--degenerate progenitor (see Nomoto, Kamiya \& Nakasato 2013 for an
alternative explanation of the unburnt C and O material). For SN 2014J,
it  has been possible to rule out red giants as the companions of
the C+O WD that exploded.

It continues to be safe to exclude SN 1991bg--events, SNe Iax, SNe Ia-CSM
and Super--Chandrasekhar SNe Ia (Ca--rich transients as well) from the
cosmological samples, as they lay outside the brightness--decline rate
relation used in cosmology. They might have been responsible (in particular
SNe Iax and SN 1991bg events) for some outliers present in the early samples
(such as the first {\it SCP} SNe Ia), for which we lacked explanation
at those epochs of the cosmologically--motivated SNe Ia searches.

Dust absorption in the host galaxy is an important source of systematic error
in SN cosmology. A way to minimize its effect on distance determinations is to
measure the properties of the SN in the rest frame infrared. It has been
demonstrated (Wood--Vasey et al. 2008;
Kirshner 2010; Barone--Nugent et al. 2012) that
SNe Ia are better standard candles in the infrared than in the optical
wavelengths. The infrared sample of nearby SNe Ia is steadily growing, now
(Friedman et al. 2014).

\section {Conclusions}

As we have seen, the last decade has brought considerable progress in the
still far from closed search for the progenitor systems of the SNe Ia.
A new picture has emerged, where single--degenerate progenitors would now
make a much narrower channel than it was thought to be in the 90's. The
highlight, here, is that the companions to SNe Ia, at the time of
explosion, are very unlikely to be red giants or supergiants, as well as
massive main--sequence or subgiant stars. This result comes from searches
for companion stars in SNe Ia remnants, in our Galaxy and in the LMC; by
looking at pre--explosion images of nearby SNe Ia, like SN 2011fe; from
X--ray surveys of SNe Ia made with {\it Swift}; from radio observations of
nearby SNe Ia, and from confrontation of the early light curves of SNe Ia with
theoretical predictions.

On the other hand, the much expanded surveys for transients, at different
wavelengths, have found from very dim explosions to overluminous outbursts.
Multidimensional modeling of different types of thermonuclear explosions has
reached a new level of realism, and they are confronted with observations
uncovering the different layers of the exploding objects with unprecedented
detail. We still lack, however, the identification of a SNe Ia with the
dismissal of some previously observed object.

Two different channels (SD and DD) leading to SN Ia explosions still appear
to be required, although the balance has now shifted towards the
double--degenerate channel, where violent mergings or violent collisions of
white dwarfs appear as a promising mechanism. The initial conditions leading
to such collisions are still unclear, however. For subluminous SNe Ia of the
SNe Iax type, or
Ca--rich transients, edge--lit He detonations that might not disrupt the
underlying C+O WD, or failed deflagrations in the outer shells, seem able to
account for the observations and for the rates of the explosions.

From all the preceding, we can reach some tentative conclusions about the
fraction of supernovae arising from different kinds of progenitor systems
and their explosion mechanisms (see Figure 9).

$\bullet$ The supernovae that show unburnt carbon make 30\% of the
SNe Ia class. If we add to that the super--Chandrasekhar explosions (2$\%$),
we can infer that around 32\% of thermonuclear supernovae should
arise from the merging of two white dwarfs. Tamped detonations in rapidly
rotating white dwarfs may be the explosion mechanism, in the
super--Chandrasekhar case, although mergings of massive white dwarfs
could also account for these events.

$\bullet$ Between 31$^{+17}_{-13}$ $\%$ and 5.6$^{+17}_{-3.7}$ of all SNe Ia do
belong to the Iax subtype, likely arising either from failed deflagrations or
from surface detonations of low--mass white dwarfs. The large error bars come
from the uncertainty on the selection effects that work against detection of
subluminous events. There are indications that this subclass of SNe Ia with
low ejection velocities do, in fact, split into two subclasses. Further
research in this are is needed.

$\bullet$ There is a 15$\%$ of SNe Ia of the 91bg--type, which are tentatively
associated with violent mergings of white dwarfs where the primary is of about
0.9 M$_{\odot}$. Detonation of the C+O mixture should then occur.

 $\bullet$ The fraction of explosions resulting from the accretion of hydrogen
from a red giant star seems to be very low, as metioned before. The SNe coming
from a symbiotic progenitor should only make 0.1--1$\%$ of all SNe Ia.

$\bullet$ About 1--2\% of events have luminosities falling well in the middle
of the bulk of SNe Ia, but they rise fast and do decline very fast after
maximum (the fraction migh be larger, due to selection effects). Their origin
remains unclear.

 $\bullet$ The remaining fraction of SNe Ia, a 21 $\%$, could come from
systems made of a C+O white dwarf plus a main--sequence or subgiant
 star, and they could
appear, before the explosion, as supersoft X--ray sources or/and recurrent
novae. In the SN of this
and the former group (as well as in those coming from non--violent DD
mergings), the explosion should start as a (generally off--centre)
deflagration, to become a detonation in reaching lower--density layers.

Given the large sample of peculiar SNe Ia, it is worth obtaining
spectral sequences, when using  SN for cosmology. Such project would be made
possible by dedicated space missions and by ground--based programs (Wood--Vasey
2010).

\section{Acknowledgments}

I would like to thank Gaston Folatelli, Mario Hamuy, Dan Kasen,
Mansi Kasliwal, Gautham Narayan, and Josh Simon, for their kind permissions
to use their Figures. My thanks also go to Hagai Perets, Lev Yungelson,
Zhengwei Liu, Alexander Tutukov, Thomas Tauris, Enrique Garc\'{\i}a--Berro,
Joe Lyman, Raffaella Margutti, Todd Thompson, Mickael Rigault, Markus Kromer,
Dan Kasen, Boaz Katz, Mario Hamuy, Michael Wood--Vasey, and Marat Gilfanov,
for valuable comments, suggestions and criticisms to the first draft of this
paper. The useful input from an anonymous referee is also acknowledged. This
work has been supported by Grant AYA2012--36353, from the Ministerio de
Econom\'{\i}a y Competitividad of Spain.

High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena (astro-ph.HE); Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO); Solar and Stellar Astrophysics (astro-ph.SR)

New approaches to SNe Ia progenitors