A Search for "Dwarf" Seyfert Nuclei. III. Spectroscopic Parameters and Properties of the Host Galaxies

Abstract: We have completed an optical spectroscopic survey of the nuclear regions (r < 200 pc) of a large sample of nearby galaxies. Although the main objectives of the survey are to search for low-luminosity active galactic nuclei and to quantify their luminosity function, the database can be used for a variety of other purposes. This paper presents measurements of the spectroscopic parameters for the 418 emission-line nuclei, along with a compilation of the global properties of all 486 galaxies in the survey. Stellar absorption generally poses a serious obstacle to obtaining accurate measurement of emission lines in nearby galactic nuclei. We describe a procedure for removing the starlight from the observed spectra in an efficient and objective manner. The main parameters of the emission lines (intensity ratios, fluxes, profile widths, equivalent widths) are measured and tabulated, as are several stellar absorption-line and continuum indices useful for studying the stellar population. Using standard nebular diagnostics, we determine the probable ionization mechanisms of the emission-line objects. The resulting spectral classifications provide extensive information on the demographics of emission-line nuclei in the local universe. This new catalog contains over 200 objects showing spectroscopic evidence for recent star formation and an equally large number of active galactic nuclei, including 46 which show broad H-alpha emission. These samples will serve as the basis of future studies of nuclear activity in nearby galaxies.

\section{Introduction}

We have recently completed an extensive optical spectroscopic survey of the
nuclei ($r$ ${_<\atop^{\sim}}$  200 pc) of nearby galaxies.  The main goals of the survey
are to systematically search for and to investigate the physical properties of
low-luminosity, or ``dwarf,'' active galactic nuclei (AGNs), but the rich
database can be used for a variety of other applications.  In previous papers
of this series, we have outlined the scientific objectives and observational
parameters in greater detail (Filippenko \& Sargent 1985, hereafter Paper I;
Ho, Filippenko, \& Sargent 1995, hereafter Paper II), and several companion
papers present various aspects of the analysis (Ho, Filippenko, \& Sargent
1997a, b, c, d; Ho {et al. } 1997e).  In brief, high-quality,
long-slit, optical spectra of moderate resolution were obtained of the nucleus
of almost every bright galaxy in the northern ($\delta\,>\, 0$$^{\circ}$) sky.
The chosen magnitude limit is $B_T$ = 12.5 mag, and the objects were selected
from the Revised Shapley-Ames Catalog of Bright Galaxies (RSA; Sandage \&
Tammann 1981). The spectra were acquired  using the Hale 5~m telescope at
Palomar Observatory and cover the regions $\sim$4230--5110 \AA\ and
$\sim$6210--6860 \AA, with spectral resolutions of approximately 4 \AA\ and
2.5 \AA, respectively.  Paper II presents a complete spectral atlas of the 486
galaxies contained in the Palomar survey.

The observational distinction between low-luminosity and high-luminosity AGNs
is largely arbitrary.  Our survey contains mostly nearby galaxies and is
designed to select objects on the faint end of the luminosity function.  Thus,
our study probes much lower luminosities than in other, more conventional
AGN samples.  The Palomar AGNs have a median (extinction-corrected) H$\alpha$\
luminosity of only 2\e{39} ergs s$^{-1}$, and over 85\% of the sources lie below
L(H$\alpha$) = 10$^{40}$ ergs s$^{-1}$\ (Ho {et al. } 1997a).  By contrast, the typical Seyfert
nucleus in the widely-studied Markarian catalog emits roughly 10$^{41}$ ergs s$^{-1}$\
in H$\alpha$\ (estimated from the compilations of Mazzarella \& Balzano 1986 and
Whittle 1992a).  Operationally, we will henceforth define ``low-luminosity''
or ``dwarf'' AGNs to be those with L(H$\alpha$) $\leq$ 10$^{40}$ ergs s$^{-1}$.

This paper focuses on the quantification of spectroscopic parameters from the
Palomar survey.  The measurements of the emission lines are presented in \S\ 2,
where we also discuss in depth our method of starlight subtraction.  Section
3 describes our method of spectral classification and the results of
applying it to our survey, while section 4 presents the measurements
of several stellar absorption-line and continuum indices useful for studying
the stellar population.  Finally, for easy reference and subsequent analysis,
we summarize in \S\ 5 a number of global properties of the host galaxies.

\section{Emission Lines}

\subsection{Starlight and Continuum Subtraction}

The optical spectra of many emission-line nuclei, particularly those residing
in host galaxies of early to intermediate Hubble types (Sbc and earlier), are
contaminated heavily, and often dominated, by the stellar component.  As
late-type giants dominate the integrated light of galaxy bulges, stellar
absorption lines affect the strengths of most emission lines of interest.
The magnitude of the effect obviously depends on the equivalent widths of the
emission lines, but it is generally large in the centers of most ``normal''
galaxies, where the emission lines are quite weak.  Consequently, quantitative
studies of most emission-line nuclei depend sensitively on the accuracy with
which the stellar absorption lines can be removed.

We adopt a modified version of the technique of ``template subtraction'' to
correct for starlight contamination.  The strategy is straightforward:
subtract from the spectrum of interest a suitably scaled template spectrum
(model) which best represents the continuum and absorption-line strength
of the stellar component; the resulting end-product should then be a
continuum-subtracted, pure emission-line spectrum.  The template model
is constructed from a library of galaxy absorption-line spectra.  Employing
a minimization algorithm, we find the linear combination of individual
spectra, which, when suitably normalized and velocity-broadened, best fits the
spectral regions in the object of interest that are free of emission lines.

The large number of galaxies in our survey presents us with an extensive
collection of absorption-line spectra spanning a wide range of velocity
dispersion, metallicity, and stellar population.  Since our survey is
observationally unbiased with respect to the presence or absence of emission
lines, fairly uniform signal-to-noise ratios (S/N) were achieved for all
galaxies.  In total, there are 65 galaxies free of visible emission lines; an
additional 14 have only very weak emission lines in the red spectrum and
almost none in the blue spectrum.  The library of 79 templates (Table 1) was
ranked according to velocity dispersion and approximate metallicity, the
latter judged by the average equivalent widths of three strong \ion{Fe}{1}
features in the blue spectrum (\S\ 4.2).  The diversity of the template
library can be seen in the sample spectra shown in Figure 1.

The $\chi^2$-minimization algorithm was adapted from a code originally
developed to study the line-of-sight velocity distributions of early-type
galaxies (see Rix \& White 1992 for a full description).  First, we corrected
all the spectra, both the emission-line objects and the templates, for
reddening due to the Galaxy (Burstein \& Heiles 1982, 1984) using the
extinction law of Cardelli, Clayton, \& Mathis (1989).  This step removes
gross continuum shape mismatches between the template and object spectra due
to extrinsic dust.  Given a list of input template spectra and an initial
guess of the velocity dispersion, the program solves for the systemic
velocity, the line-broadening function (assumed to be a Gaussian), the relative
contributions of the various templates, and the overall continuum shape.  In
general, a good solution for the absorption-line spectrum does not guarantee
an equally good match for the continuum shape, as the latter can be affected
by dust intrinsic to the galaxies, by residual bandpass calibration errors,
and by the non-uniqueness of the continuum shape as predicted by the strength
of the stellar absorption lines.  The best-fitting model is then subtracted
from the original spectrum, yielding a pure emission-line spectrum.  We
typically chose from our master list one to several candidates whose velocity
dispersions, metallicity, and range in stellar populations bracket the
probable values in the object of interest.  We often iterated this process
several times using different combinations of input templates.  Each iteration
was applied separately to the blue and the red spectra, since the two are not
contiguous. We selected the final, best model by inspecting the flatness of
the residual spectrum in regions not containing strong emission lines.

Figure 2 illustrates this process for NGC 3596, whose nucleus is undergoing
star formation, and for the Seyfert 2 nucleus of NGC 7743.  In the case of
NGC 3596, the model consists of a combination of the spectrum of NGC 205,
a dE5 galaxy dominated by A-type stars, and NGC 4339, an elliptical with a
K-giant spectrum.  Note that in the original observed spectrum ({\it top}),
H$\gamma$, [\ion{O}{3}]\ $\lambda$\lamb 4959, 5007, and [\ion{O}{1}]\ $\lambda$ 6300 are hardly
visible, whereas they can be easily measured after starlight subtraction
({\it bottom}).  The intensities of both H$\beta$\ and H$\alpha$\ were modified
substantially, and the ratio of the doublet [\ion{S}{2}]\ $\lambda$\lamb 6716, 6731 lines
changed.  The effective template for NGC 7743 also makes use of NGC 205 and
NGC 4339, but in this case the intermediate-age population contributes
substantially less; moreover, the fit improved after including a
contribution from NGC 628, an Sc galaxy with a nucleus dominated by A and
F stars.  Additional examples of starlight subtraction in Figures 3 and 4
depict the range of emission-line intensities encountered in practice.  The
weakest emission lines we can measure have equivalent widths of $\sim$0.25
\AA, and we take this to be our detection limit (3 $\sigma$).

The philosophy behind our empirical method is simple and close in spirit to
that of a similar technique often employed in the past (e.g., Costero \&
Osterbrock 1977; Koski 1978; Shuder \& Osterbrock 1981; Peimbert \&
Torres-Peimbert 1981; Rose \& Searle 1982; Filippenko \& Halpern 1984;
Filippenko 1985; Filippenko \& Sargent 1988; Ho, Filippenko, \& Sargent
1993).  The templates used in
these previous studies, however, were generally derived either from the
spectrum of a single, different galaxy with weak or undetectable emission
lines or from the spectrum of an off-nuclear position in the same galaxy.
Both cases, however, can suffer from significant shortcomings.  In the first
instance, the absorption-line galaxy chosen as the template may not accurately
reflect the stellar content and velocity dispersion of the object in
question.  Most studies generally invest only limited observing time to the
acquisition of template spectra, and the suitability of the choice of
templates is not always stated explicitly.  In the second case, the
off-nuclear spectrum may not be completely free of line emission, and, if
there are radial gradients in the stellar population, the off-nuclear light
may be a poor representation of the nuclear position.  Our implementation of
the template-subtraction technique largely overcomes these difficulties.
Instead of using a single (and often subjectively determined) spectrum as
the template, we use an objective algorithm to find the best combination of
spectra to create an ``effective'' template.  The advantages of this
modification are obvious.  Use of a large basis of input spectra ensures a
closer match to the true underlying stellar population, while automation of
the process minimizes subjective judgement and allows efficient processing of
the large database.

Our method of starlight removal can be futher compared with those which
generate the best-fitting model for the stellar spectrum from population
synthesis (e.g., Keel 1983b).  Although physically more rigorous, the
appropriateness of the latter approach may be questionable.  The available
input stellar libraries are drawn mainly from stars with solar metallicity,
while galaxy nuclei, especially those in early-type systems, tend to be
metal-rich environments (Spinrad \& Taylor 1971).  Indeed, for many of his
objects, Keel was unable to measure even relatively prominent emission lines
such as H$\beta$.  In an effort to circumvent some of the problems encountered
in traditional synthesis techniques, Bica and co-workers (Bica \&
Alloin 1986; Bica 1988; Storchi-Bergmann, Bica, \& Pastoriza 1990) have
compiled a spectral library of star clusters having a range of metallicities.

Finally, a common practice involves fitting the Balmer absorption and emission
series simultaneously by assuming that all the absorption lines have the
same equivalent width (e.g., McCall, Rybski, \& Shields 1985; Dinerstein
\& Shields 1986; Liu \& Kennicutt 1995; Veilleux {et al. } 1995).  Although
H$\delta$, H$\gamma$, and H$\beta$ have roughly comparable equivalent widths
under a variety of conditions, H$\alpha$\ appears to show deviations
(D\'\i az 1988).  Moreover, the profiles of the Balmer absorption series are
pressure broadened, especially for a young to intermediate-age population;
failure to account for this in the line-fitting process, as seems to have
been the case in the above-mentioned studies, will severely compromise the
outcome of the line decomposition.  Moreover, in fitting only the Balmer
lines, one implicitly assumes that stellar absorption does not affect the other
emission lines in the optical window.  This, however, is unjustified for old
stellar systems: stellar features affect the majority of emission lines
to some degree (e.g., Fig. 3 of Ho {et al. } 1993), and the effect can be severe
if the emission lines are weak.

Column 13 of Table 2 lists the template(s) used for each of the 418
emission-line galaxies in the survey.  Nonstellar, featureless emission
dominates the continuum in several luminous Seyfert galaxies (e.g., NGC 1275,
NGC 3227, NGC 4151), and starlight subtraction need not be applied for these.
Likewise, the continuum is essentially featureless for a few objects with
intense star-forming regions (e.g., IC 10, NGC 784, NGC 1569).  For these
objects, we fitted the continuum with a low-order spline function and
subtracted it prior to line measurement.

\subsection{Measurement of Emission Lines}

After starlight subtraction, the intensity, full width at half maximum (FWHM),
and central wavelength were determined for all emission lines detected.  The
prominent lines include H$\gamma$, H$\beta$, [\ion{O}{3}]\ $\lambda$\lamb 4959, 5007, [\ion{O}{1}]\
$\lambda$\lamb 6300, 6363, [\ion{N}{2}]\ $\lambda$\lamb 6548, 6583, H$\alpha$, and [\ion{S}{2}]\ $\lambda$\lamb
6716, 6731.  In many cases, the lines can be measured straightforwardly
by fitting a single Gaussian to each line, with the following exceptions.
(1) Profile fitting is unreliable for very noisy data, for lines that are
affected by large residuals from poor starlight subtraction, or for lines with
exceptionally complex structure, such as those showing boxy profiles or
multiple velocity components.  In these cases, we resorted to summing the
line intensity between two endpoints interactively specified.  (2) The
strength of H$\beta$\ emission in a few objects is either unavailable (e.g., the
corresponding pixels were damaged by cosmic rays) or otherwise very unreliable
because of severe template mismatch.  Since our spectral classification of the
nuclei (\S\ 3) depends on H$\beta$, we simply fixed its strength in these cases
based on that of H$\alpha$\ by adopting a theoretical ratio of the two lines, with
the implicit assumption that the reddening is negligible.  (3) Approximately
10\% of the sample exhibits broad H$\alpha$\ emission and requires more involved
line decomposition; this subset of objects is discussed in detail by Ho {et al. }
(1997e).  (4) A significant fraction of the galaxies, especially those with
active nuclei, have lines with obviously asymmetric shapes and other
deviations from a single Gaussian profile.  If warranted by the data quality,
these cases were fitted with multiple Gaussian components to better
characterize the parameters of the line profile.

We placed upper limits on the intensities of undetected, but diagnostically
important, emission lines by simulating measurements of the noise level near
the expected positions of the lines.  The widths of the measurement
``windows'' were assumed to be comparable to the FWHMs of the lines which
are detected in the same object.

Table 2 (cols. 2--8) summarizes the observed (not corrected for reddening)
intensities of the main emission lines relative to the intensity of the narrow
component of H$\alpha$; we chose the normalization relative to H$\alpha$\ instead of
H$\beta$\ because the former is usually better determined. If the observing
conditions were deemed to be approximately photometric (see Paper II), we list
the H$\alpha$\ flux (col. 9) and the associated luminosity (col. 10) using the
distances adopted in Table 10; nonphotometric measurements are given as
lower limits.  Column 11 lists the equivalent width of the narrow H$\alpha$\
emission line, obtained by dividing the H$\alpha$\ intensity by the continuum level
at 6563 \AA.

In some spectra, particularly those with sufficiently high S/N, one or more of
the following weaker lines were also measurable, depending on the object:
[\ion{O}{3}]\ $\lambda$ 4363, \ion{He}{1}\ $\lambda$ 4471, \ion{He}{2}\ $\lambda$ 4686, [\ion{S}{3}]\ $\lambda$ 6312,
[\ion{Fe}{10}]\ $\lambda$ 6374, and \ion{He}{1}\ $\lambda$ 6678.   The intensities of these lines,
where detected, are summarized in Table 3.

Previous studies of the profiles of narrow emission lines (e.g., Heckman {et al. }
1981; Feldman {et al. } 1982; Whittle 1985) generally use [\ion{O}{3}]\ $\lambda$ 5007 as the
fiducial line, since it is normally the brightest line in the optical spectrum
and is usually unaffected by blending with other lines.  In our survey,
however, we will use [\ion{N}{2}]\ $\lambda$ 6583 instead of [\ion{O}{3}]\ $\lambda$ 5007 as the
fiducial line for line-width measurements, since [\ion{N}{2}]\ lies in the red
spectrum, and the S/N and spectral resolution of the red spectra are superior
to those of the blue spectra.   Despite being partly blended with H$\alpha$\ in
some instances, [\ion{N}{2}]\ $\lambda$ 6583 is normally the strongest line in the
red spectrum next to H$\alpha$, and, unlike H$\alpha$, it is not strongly affected
by potential uncertainties introduced by imperfect starlight subtraction.
The FWHM values of [\ion{N}{2}]\ are given in column 12 of Table 2.  The FWHM is
the simplest, albeit not necessarily the most reliable (e.g., Whittle 1985),
indicator of the line width.  Nevertheless, we present the FWHM measurements
here as a first-order parameterization of the emission-line kinematics;
a more extensive analysis of the line profiles is deferred to a later
paper.  The tabulated line widths were corrected for instrumental
resolution by subtracting the instrumental width in quadrature from the
observed width: FWHM$^2$ = FWHM$^2_{\rm obs}\,-$ FWHM$^2_{\rm inst}$.
FWHM$_{\rm inst}$ is obtained by fitting a Gaussian profile to a strong,
unblended emission line near 6583 \AA\ in the comparison lamp spectrum taken
closest in time to the object of interest.\footnote{The median FWHM$_{\rm inst}$
for the entire survey is found to be 2.4 \AA, somewhat smaller than the
nominal value of 2.5 \AA.  For completeness, we note that the median
FWHM$_{\rm inst}$ of the blue spectra near $\lambda$\ = 5000 \AA\ is 3.8 \AA,
again slightly better than the nominal resolution of 4 \AA.}  The lines in
the comparison lamp spectra are very nearly Gaussian in shape.  To minimize
the possibility of corrupting the final FWHM values from systematic errors in
the determination of the instrumental profile, we only apply the correction if
FWHM$_{\rm obs}$ exceeds FWHM$_{\rm inst}$ by at least 50\%.  Widths smaller
than this are reported as upper limits.

\subsection{Reddening Correction}

We adopt the Cardelli {et al. } (1989) extinction curve to correct the line
intensities for reddening due to Galactic dust; the reddening values we
assume, taken from Burstein \& Heiles (1982, 1984), are listed in column 3 of
Table 11.  Next, we use the corrected H$\alpha$/H$\beta$\ intensity ratio (Table 4;
col. 2) to calculate the internal reddening [$E(B-V)_{int}$; col. 3] due to
dust which is either intrinsically associated with the line-emitting gas or
lying in its foreground, but belonging to the host galaxy.  The Cardelli et
al. extinction curve was again assumed.  For objects whose spectra resemble
\ion{H}{2}\ regions, we take the intrinsic H$\alpha$/H$\beta$\ ratio to be 2.86, appropriate
for case B recombination in photoionized nebulae with $n_e$ = 10$^2$ cm$^{-3}$\ and
$T_e$ = 10$^4$ K (Brocklehurst 1971), whereas for AGNs we adopt an intrinsic
ratio of 3.1 (Halpern \& Steiner 1983; Gaskell \& Ferland 1984).  Note that in
some objects the observed Balmer decrement is significantly less than the
theoretical value.  These obviously discrepant values, which are usually
either lower limits or otherwise have a low quality rating, most likely can be
attributed to inaccurate starlight subtraction, especially for H$\beta$.  We
assign an internal extinction of zero for these objects.

Table 4 (cols. 4 and 6 through 9) lists five important diagnostic line
ratios.  They have been corrected for Galactic and internal reddening,
although in all cases the correction is nearly negligible because of the close
wavelength separation of the lines used in the ratios.

\subsection{Electron Densities}

The electron density, $n_e$, can be estimated from the ratio $R$([\ion{S}{2}]) $\equiv$
[\ion{S}{2}]\ $\lambda$ 6716/[\ion{S}{2}]\ $\lambda$ 6731.  $R$([\ion{S}{2}]) serves as an effective
densitometer (e.g., Osterbrock 1989) so long as $n_e$ does not greatly exceed
the critical density of [\ion{S}{2}]\ ($\sim$3\e{3} cm$^{-3}$), above which the lines become
collisionally de-excited.  We used the NEBULAR package implemented within
IRAF\footnote{IRAF is distributed by the National Optical Astronomy
Observatories, which are operated by the Association of Universities for
Research in Astronomy, Inc., under cooperative agreement with the National
Science Foundation.} to compute $n_e$ (Table 4; col. 5) from $R$([\ion{S}{2}]) (col.
4), assuming $T_e$ = 10$^4$ K.  The software, described by Shaw \&
Dufour (1995), assumes that the ground-state electron configuration of
common ions such as S$^+$ can be approximated by a five-level atom.  The
atomic data for S$^+$ are those published by Cai \& Pradhan (1993).

\subsection{Uncertainties and Error Estimates}

It is generally difficult to evaluate the uncertainty associated with the
starlight-subtraction process, which in almost all cases dominates the
systematic errors in the line measurements.  Hence, formal errors are not
assigned to the entries in Tables 2--4.  Instead, we employ less quantitative,
but nevertheless informative, quality ratings (blank, ``b,'' and ``c'') to
denote the probable reliability of the quoted values.  Throughout the tables,
entries not followed by a flag (blank rating) are deemed to be of the best
quality.  We estimate that, on average, the highest accuracy achieved for the
line intensities is on the order of $\pm$10\%--30\%, depending on the line.  A
quality rating of ``b'' signifies probable errors of $\pm$30\%--50\%, while a
rating of ``c'' pertains to probable errors as large as $\pm$100\%.  Note that
these estimates do not apply to absolute fluxes, which are discussed below.
The assignment of the ratings was based on our experience with data of this
type, on repeated measurements of objects having multiple observations, and on
extensive experimentation with a range of template models.

Being relatively bright in the red region and not strongly affected
by stellar absorption, the intensities of [\ion{N}{2}]\ and [\ion{S}{2}]\ can be determined to
an accuracy of $\sim$10\% in the best cases.  [\ion{O}{1}]\ $\lambda$ 6300, athough not
crucially dependent on starlight subtraction, is generally much weaker, and
it is difficult to achieve errors less than 20\%--30\%.  Although [\ion{O}{3}]\ $\lambda$
5007 is usually quite bright and not strongly affected by absorption, the blue
spectra of our survey unfortunately have lower sensitivity than the red
spectra; nevertheless, accuracies of 10\%--20\% can be attained for this
line.  The Balmer series potentially suffers from the most serious uncertainty,
whose magnitude becomes progressively larger from H$\alpha$\ to H$\gamma$.  Because
of the wavelength coincidence between the emission and absorption components,
and because the strength of the absorption component depends sensitively
on the age of the stellar population, the intensities of the hydrogen emission
lines can vary quite dramatically depending on the choice of template model.
Thus, template mismatch can introduce rather large uncertainties in the
strengths of the hydrogen emission lines.  On the other hand, we believe that
we can ascertain the suitability of the chosen template model.  Since the
hydrogen absorption lines usually have pressure-broadened, Voigt profiles,
their wings are much broader than those of the sharper emission component,
thus making it possible to judge the appropriateness of the template model:
if the template undersubtracts the absorption, a shallow ``bowl'' is evident
beneath the emission line; conversely, if oversubtraction occurs, a broad
``hump'' would be noticeable.  Given that the equivalent widths of the Balmer
absorption lines rarely exceed 2--3 \AA\ (see \S\ 4.2 and Table 9), it is
reasonable to assume that emission lines with an equivalent width
$\sim$10 \AA\ should have an error of at most 10\% for H$\alpha$\ and perhaps 20\%
for H$\beta$.

Although we provide emission-line fluxes and luminosities (Table 2) and
continuum magnitudes (\S\ 4.1; Table 8) for about 80\% of the survey objects,
these values do not have high accuracy for at least two reasons.  First, the
observations were taken through a narrow slit of fixed width (2$^{\prime\prime}$).
The narrow-line emission in many objects is known to be both spatially
extended and inhomogeneous.  The amount of light included for each object
obviously depends on the specific spatial distribution of the line emission
and of the stellar continuum, on the accuracy of centering the object on
the slit and subsequent telescope guiding, and on the seeing conditions.
Moreover, because of the fixed slit size, the amount of light admitted into
the aperture will depend on the distance of the source.  Second, we did not
attempt to perform rigorous spectrophotometry; the sky conditions were merely
monitored by eye periodically through the night.  To make a rough estimate of
the accuracy of the fluxes, we compared all available measurements for objects
which were observed using the same slit width and in more than one epoch, under
purportedly ``photometric'' conditions.  Some of the (unpublished) data were
collected with the Hale 5~m telescope and the double spectrograph, but at lower
resolution, and others were obtained from Lick Observatory using the Shane
3~m telescope and the Kast spectrograph (Miller \& Stone 1993), also at lower
resolution.  The comparison, which could be made for about 30 galaxies,
showed that the fluxes are generally consistent to within $\pm$50\% and never
deviated by more than a factor of 2.  Therefore, we take this to be the
range of internal uncertainty associated with each individual measurement,
although the uncertainty in our subsequent analysis should be much less because
we only consider the ensemble properties of the sample.

The aperture effect, although expected to be present at some level, evidently
is not very severe.  The distribution of H$\alpha$\ emission-line fluxes shows no
obvious trend with source distance (Fig. 5).  The only discernible pattern,
due to the Malmquist bias, is the lack of points in the lower left corner of
the diagram, implying a deficit of nearby (${_<\atop^{\sim}}$  20 Mpc) high-luminosity
sources.  Nevertheless, for the other reasons mentioned above, we still
strongly caution the reader against using any individual measurement for
quantitative applications.

Finally, we consider the reliability of the line-width measurements.  The
merits of using [\ion{N}{2}]\ $\lambda$ 6583 as the representative narrow emission line
for kinematic measurements were discussed in \S\ 2.2.  The errors
associated with the actual measurement of the FWHM should in general be
${_<\atop^{\sim}}$  10\% of the line width.  What is potentially more important are
possible systematic biases on the line widths introduced during the
observations.  Under good seeing conditions in which the width of
the seeing disk is smaller than the width of the slit, and for two sources
having identical intrinsic line widths, the observed line width of an
unresolved source will be systematically narrower than that of an extended
source, provided that the guiding errors do not exceed the slit width.
This effect can therefore introduce a systematic bias in the measured line
widths depending on the structure of the nuclear regions.  However, we
anticipate that this source of error will be unimportant in our survey
because the combination of guiding errors and seeing was comparable to the
slit width.  We confirmed our hypothesis by examining the distribution of
the seeing conditions (FWHM) recorded in the observation logs (Fig. 6); there
are no systematic differences among the various classes of nuclei (\S\ 3),
with the mean and median seeing FWHMs being essentially identical for the four
classes.  More importantly, within each class, there are no discernible
differences in the average FWHM([\ion{N}{2}]) for the objects observed under ``good''
seeing compared to those observed under ``poor'' seeing, where we have taken
the dividing line to be FWHM = 1\farcs5.  The only possible exception is the
Seyfert group, where the average FWHM([\ion{N}{2}]) = 274 and 241 ~km~s$^{-1}$\ for seeing
FWHM $<$ 1\farcs5 and $\geq$ 1\farcs5, respectively.  This trend, however, is
opposite to that predicted, and, given the small sample size, is probably
statistically insignificant.

\section{Spectral Classification}

The optical spectral region contains several emission lines whose intensity
ratios can be used to discriminate different sources of ionization.
Baldwin, Phillips, \& Terlevich (1981) suggested several two-dimensional,
line-intensity ratio diagrams that have since become widely-used diagnostic
tools to classify emission-line objects.  In these diagrams, nebulae
photoionized by hot, young stars (\ion{H}{2}\ regions) can be distinguished from
those photoionized by a harder radiation field, such as that of an AGN.
The Str\"omgren sphere of a classical, ionization-bounded \ion{H}{2}\ region makes a
fairly sharp transition between the ionized interior and the surrounding
neutral medium.  Consequently, the partially-ionized transition zone, from
which most of the low-ionization forbidden lines (such as [\ion{O}{1}], [\ion{S}{2}], and
to some extent [\ion{N}{2}]) are emitted, is quite limited in size.  By contrast,
an AGN-like ionizing continuum has sufficient high-energy photons to sustain
an extensive partially-ionized zone in clouds optically thick to the Lyman
continuum, thereby enhancing the strengths of the low-ionization lines
relative to those seen in \ion{H}{2}\ regions.  A suitable choice of an excitation
indicator, such as [\ion{O}{2}]\ $\lambda$ 3727/[\ion{O}{3}]\ $\lambda$ 5007 or [\ion{O}{3}]\
$\lambda$ 5007/H$\beta$, further delineates the excitation sequence in \ion{H}{2}\ regions
and divides AGNs into a high-excitation class  (Seyferts) and a low-excitation
class [low-ionization nuclear emission-line regions (LINERs); Heckman 1980b].

The separation between the two principal ionization sources (young stars
vs. AGN) and between the two AGN excitation classes (Seyferts vs. LINERs)
obviously does not have sharp, rigorously-defined boundaries.  In practice,
however, one must impose somewhat arbitrary, albeit empirically motivated,
criteria to establish an internally consistent system of classification.
In this study, we use the diagnostic diagrams recommended by Veilleux \&
Osterbrock (1987), since they employ line-intensity ratios that are relatively
insensitive to reddening ([\ion{O}{3}]\ $\lambda$ 5007/H$\beta$, [\ion{O}{1}]\ $\lambda$ 6300/H$\alpha$,
[\ion{N}{2}]\ $\lambda$ 6583/H$\alpha$, and [\ion{S}{2}]\ $\lambda$\lamb 6716, 6731/H$\alpha$) and that are
contained in the spectral coverage of our survey.  For concreteness, we adopt
the classification criteria outlined in Table 5; these are very similar to
those used by Veilleux \& Osterbrock.  In addition to \ion{H}{2}\ nuclei, Seyferts,
and LINERs, we also recognize a group of ``transition objects,'' noted by
Ho {et al. } (1993) as emission-line nuclei having [\ion{O}{1}]\ strengths intermediate
between those of \ion{H}{2}\ nuclei and LINERs.  Ho {et al. } (1993; see also Ho 1996)
proposed that transition objects can be most naturally explained as ``normal''
LINERs whose integrated spectra are diluted or contaminated by
neighboring \ion{H}{2}\ regions.  In this interpretation, transition objects should
be considered part of the LINER class and should be accounted in AGN
statistics (if all LINERs are truly AGNs), although an alternative explanation
for these objects based solely on stellar photoionization has also been
suggested (Filippenko \& Terlevich 1992; Shields 1992).

As discussed in Ho {et al. } (1997e), broad H$\alpha$\ emission can be discerned in
a significant number of objects in our survey.  Although the typical
luminosity and contrast of the broad component are much smaller than those
of ``classical'' type 1 Seyferts, the widths of the H$\alpha$\ line (FWHM $\approx$
1000--4000 ~km~s$^{-1}$), especially relative to the forbidden lines, signify the
presence of a broad-line region.  Although the existence of such
``intermediate-type'' nuclei has been recognized for a long time (Osterbrock
1977, 1981; Shuder 1980), it is normally thought that weak, broad H$\alpha$\
emission is widely found only in Seyfert nuclei.  The Palomar
survey has demonstrated conclusively that broad H$\alpha$\ exists also in LINERs,
and perhaps even in some transition objects.  Thus, analogous to the
conventional nomenclature of Seyfert nuclei, we propose that the ``type 1''
and ``type 2'' designations, along with the intermediate types (1.2, 1.5, 1.8,
and 1.9; Osterbrock 1981), be extended to include LINERs and transition
objects.  We use the criteria of Whittle (1992a) to quantitatively assign
numerical values for the type index.

We wish to stress that our classification system is defined by a set of
{\it spectroscopic} criteria that depends entirely on the line-intensity
ratios of several prominent, narrow, optical emission lines, rather than by a
combination of spectroscopic, photometric, and morphological characteristics,
as has been customary in many older studies.  The requirement that a Seyfert
nucleus be bright and semistellar in appearance (e.g., de Vaucouleurs \& de
Vaucouleurs 1968), for instance, in addition to being subjective, obviously
cannot be extended to nuclei of very low luminosities, whose contrast relative
to the galaxy bulge becomes the imperceptibly low.  Likewise, as pointed out
by Phillips, Charles, \& Baldwin (1983), the traditionally accepted definition
based on the {\it widths} of the emission lines (Weedman 1970, 1977; Balzano
\& Weedman 1981; Shuder \& Osterbrock 1981) should be abandoned.  The
widths of the emission lines in active nuclei correlate strongly with
luminosity (Phillips {et al. } 1983; Whittle 1985, 1992b; Ho 1996; Ho {et al. }
1997d), and imposing an arbitrary line-width cutoff selects objects by their
luminosities.  Finally, one should resist the practice of automatically
labeling objects as ``Seyfert 1s'' simply from their having emission lines
(e.g., H$\alpha$) arising from a broad-line region (e.g., Paper I).  As mentioned
above, broad lines {\it also} exist in objects with lower ionization levels,
and these, according to their narrow-line spectra, would be classified as
either LINERs or transition objects.

The last column of Table 4 lists the adopted classification for each of the
418 emission-line nuclei, while Figures 7{\it a}--7{\it c} show the
locations of the objects on the three Veilleux \& Osterbrock (1987) diagnostic
diagrams.  Some representative spectra of each class, offset from each other
for clarity, are plotted in Figures 8--12.  We detected emission-line nuclei
in 86\% of the survey galaxies.  In total, there are 206 \ion{H}{2}\ nuclei, 94
LINERs, 65 transition objects, and 52 Seyferts.  These make up, respectively,
49\%, 23\%, 16\%, and 12\% of the emission-line objects and 42\%, 19\%, 13\%,
11\% of the entire galaxy sample (Ho {et al. } 1997a discusses the overall
statistics of the emission-line nuclei in greater detail).  One object
(NGC 1003) could not be classified because of the large uncertainties in
the line ratios.

It should be emphasized that the classification process is not always
unambiguous, for at least three reasons.  First, the three conditions
involving the low-ionization lines ([\ion{O}{1}], [\ion{N}{2}], and [\ion{S}{2}]) do not always hold
simultaneously.  This reflects the empirical nature of the diagnostic
diagrams as well as the possibility of any one line ratio to be enhanced
or depressed with respect to the other two as a result of, for instance,
selective abundance variations.   Second, substantial measurement uncertainty
may be associated with any given line-intensity ratio.  Finally, one or more
of the line ratios is sometimes only available as an upper limit.
Thus, each object must be evaluated individually, taking all of these
factors into consideration, before a classification can be assigned to it.
In view of the potential selective enhancement of nitrogen in galactic nuclei
(e.g., Storchi-Bergmann \& Pastoriza 1989, 1990), less weight is given to the
[\ion{N}{2}]/H$\alpha$\ ratio than to either [\ion{O}{1}]/H$\alpha$\ or [\ion{S}{2}]/H$\alpha$.  If a reliable
measurement of [\ion{O}{1}]\ is available, [\ion{O}{1}]/H$\alpha$\ is given the largest weight,
since, of the three low-ionization lines, it is the most sensitive to the
shape of the ionizing spectrum.  Where more than one classification may be
consistent with the data, both are given, with the more likely one, and the
one finally adopted, listed first.  Some degree of subjectivity must
unavoidably enter into the classification process, although we have tried
throughout to be as consistent and unbiased as possible.

We should point out that the definition of LINERs adopted here differs from
that originally proposed by Heckman (1980b), which is based exclusively on the
relative strengths of [\ion{O}{1}], [\ion{O}{2}], and [\ion{O}{3}].  Nevertheless, inspection of the
full optical spectra of LINERs (e.g., Ho {et al. } 1993) reveals that in practice
the two sets of classification criteria generally identify the same objects.
This merely reflects that [\ion{O}{3}]/H$\beta$\ inversely correlates with [\ion{O}{2}]/[\ion{O}{3}]\
for conditions of low excitation (see Fig. 2 in Baldwin {et al. } 1981).  Figure
13 shows the distribution of [\ion{O}{1}]/[\ion{O}{3}]\ for all objects classified as LINERs
in our survey according to the definition adopted here and for which this line
ratio is securely known.  Clearly, almost all of the objects have [\ion{O}{1}]/[\ion{O}{3}]\
${_>\atop^{\sim}}$  0.33, one of Heckman's criteria.

In general, our classifications should be much better determined than those
currently available in the literature, and we recommend the classification
given here for overlapping objects.  Previous studies of this kind (e.g.,
Stauffer 1982a, b; Keel 1983a, b; Phillips {et al. } 1986; V\'eron-Cetty \&
V\'eron 1986; V\'eron \& V\'eron-Cetty 1986) often relied exclusively on
[\ion{N}{2}]/H$\alpha$\ for classification: any nucleus having [\ion{N}{2}]/H$\alpha$\ larger than some
limit, usually taken to be $\sim$0.6, was automatically assumed to be
``active.''  As discussed above, basing the classification on just one line
ratio can often be misleading, even if [\ion{N}{2}]/H$\alpha$\ statistically correlates
well with [\ion{O}{1}]/H$\alpha$\ and [\ion{S}{2}]/H$\alpha$\ (Fig. 14).  The results are all the more
unreliable if starlight subtraction has not been treated carefully or
consistently, as was the case in some of the older surveys; undersubtraction
of the stellar absorption lines, or failure to remove them altogether, will
result in substantial overestimation of [\ion{N}{2}]/H$\alpha$.  Moreover, some of the
above-mentioned studies did not have sufficient wavelength coverage to include
H$\beta$\ and [\ion{O}{3}], thereby leaving the excitation of the objects unconstrained.

In her analysis of a sample of relatively bright Seyfert 2 nuclei and LINERs,
Storchi-Bergmann (1991) showed that the [\ion{N}{2}]/H$\alpha$\ ratio depends
systematically on aperture size or source distance --- larger apertures
include more extranuclear emission from \ion{H}{2}\ regions, thereby diluting the
nuclear spectrum and lowering the observed [\ion{N}{2}]/H$\alpha$\ ratio.  If this effect
is severe, it can of course change the spectral classification from that of an
AGN to an \ion{H}{2}\ nucleus, and the AGN fraction in a survey such as ours will be
underestimated. Since our observations were acquired with a fixed slit size,
we know that this distance-dependent effect must be present at some
level, and we need to evaluate to what extent our classifications might be
influenced by it.  Figure 15 plots the distribution of [\ion{N}{2}]/H$\alpha$\ values as
a function of distance; all the emission-line objects are shown together as
one group, as each of the four spectral classes separately, and with the
three AGN classes summed into one.  Within the limited range of distances in
our sample, the [\ion{N}{2}]/H$\alpha$\ ratio exhibits no pronounced variation with
distance.  Variations in effective aperture size do not adversely affect our
spectral classifications in the mean, although, of course, small errors may
still affect individual objects.

\section{Stellar Parameters}

Our starlight-subtraction procedure yields, as a by-product, the best-fitting
continuum and absorption-line model for each galaxy processed in this manner.
These model template spectra, together with the original set of templates,
contain useful information pertaining to the stellar component of the nuclei.
Because of the high S/N of our spectra, even relatively weak stellar
absorption lines can be measured accurately.  Unfortunately, the limited
wavelength coverage of our observing setup excludes several key stellar
features (e.g., the blue coverage just misses the 4000 \AA\ break to the left,
and \ion{Mg}{1} $b$ $\lambda$ 5175 and \ion{Fe}{1} $\lambda$ 5270 to the right);
nevertheless, it does include a number of stellar indices that can be used
as diagnostics of the stellar population.  These include the Balmer lines
(H$\gamma$, H$\beta$, and H$\alpha$), the G band at 4300 \AA, \ion{Ca}{1} $\lambda$ 4455
and \ion{Ca}{1}+\ion{Fe}{1} $\lambda$ 6495, \ion{Fe}{1} $\lambda$\lamb 4383, 4531,
4668, and occasionally \ion{He}{2}\ $\lambda$ 4686 emission from Wolf-Rayet stars.  The
shape of the continuum additionally provides some constraints on the stellar
content and the reddening.

Our survey is also a rich source of stellar velocity dispersions.  Because
the full analysis of the velocity dispersions is rather lengthy and involved,
we defer discussion of these measurements to a separate paper.

\subsection{Measurement of Continuum Indices}
The continuum flux density, $f_\lambda$, was determined at three points along
the spectrum centered on the rest wavelengths of H$\gamma$ (4340 \AA), H$\beta$\
(4861 \AA), and H$\alpha$\ (6563 \AA).  In order to obtain the
continuum values in a consistent, objective manner, the spectra were
measured using an automated algorithm.  For each of the fiducial
wavelengths, the mean intensities of two flanking, relatively line-free
regions were determined, and the average of the two resulting values was
taken to be the continuum level at the center of the line.  Table 6 shows the
wavelength ranges of the continuum regions adopted.  It is necessary to
exclude the region containing the absorption line itself so as not to
artificially depress the true continuum level.  Moreover, averaging over a
sufficiently large wavelength window prevents the final value from being
significantly affected by small-scale structure that may be present in
the spectra.  The continuum measurements, expressed in magnitudes ($m_{44}$,
$m_{49}$, $m_{66}$), are listed in Table 8 for all objects observed under
photometric conditions, where $m$ = --2.5 log $f_\nu\,-48.6$, with $f_\nu$ in
units of ergs s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$\ Hz$^{-1}$\ (Oke \& Gunn 1983).

We further use the continuum magnitudes to define three ``color'' indices:
$c(44-49)\,\equiv\,m_{44} - m_{49}$, $c(44-66)\,\equiv\,m_{44} - m_{66}$, and
$c(49-66)\,\equiv\,m_{49} - m_{66}$.  Since the blue and red spectra for each
galaxy were taken simultaneously, their relative calibration should be
reliable and does not depend on sky conditions.  Hence, color indices are
available for all objects.

Lastly, an absolute magnitude, $M_{44}$, is given for the bluest band
using the distances assumed in Table 10 (see \S\ 5.2).

\subsection{Measurement of Equivalent Widths of Absorption Lines}
The definitions of the nine stellar absorption-line indices extracted from the
spectra are given in Table 7 (see also Fig. 16 for a graphic representation
of the definitions of the indices), and the results are tabulated in Table 9.
In addition to the three individual iron indices, we also calculated an
average iron index, $<$W(Fe)$>$ $\equiv\,{1\over 3}$[W(Fe4383) + W(Fe4531)
+ W(Fe4668)], which should serve as a more robust indicator of the
iron strength.

The measurement of equivalent widths, which requires determination of the
flux of a spectral feature and its associated continuum level, can be
affected by systematic errors depending on the S/N of the data, the strength
of the feature, and the velocity dispersion.  If the feature of interest
is weak or the data particularly noisy, for example, marking the endpoints
of the feature and the appropriate continuum level can sometimes be ambiguous
if done manually.  To ensure internal consistency in the data set, the
equivalent widths were measured noninteractively.  Briefly, for each of
the indices, the fluxes of three wavelength regions in the rest frame of
the object were determined:  one region corresponds to the limits of the
absorption feature of interest, while two regions on either side define two
continuum levels (Table 7).  Interpolation of the two flanking continuum
values gives the continuum level underneath the spectral feature, and the
ratio of the integrated flux of the feature to the continuum flux yields the
equivalent width.

\section{Compilation of Host Galaxy Properties}
Subsequent papers in this series will examine possible connections
between the spectroscopic characteristics of the nuclei and the more global
properties of the host galaxies.  In preparation for this analysis, we
provide here a compilation of a number of host galaxy parameters (Tables 10
and 11).  We follow closely the format and notation of Whittle (1992a), who has
recently provided a comprehensive summary of the global properties of bright
Seyfert galaxies, although we also list several quantities not given by
Whittle.  We have relied heavily on the Third Reference Catalogue of Bright
Galaxies (RC3; de Vaucouleurs {et al. } 1991) for much of the data because this
catalog has paid considerable attention to synthesizing data from a variety
of sources into a single system.  Since we will be primarily interested in
comparative analysis, the most important consideration is to have at hand
a consistent, homogeneous database.  A short description of each parameter
tabulated is given below.

\subsection{Morphological Type}
We list for each galaxy the mean revised morphological type and the mean
numerical Hubble type index (T), as given in the RC3.  The morphological
classification of the RC3 parallels the system in the first two editions of the
catalog, which itself is based on the principles outlined by de Vaucouleurs
(1959, 1963).  In this system, T = --6 to --4 correspond to ellipticals (E),
T = --3 to --1 to lenticulars (S0), T = 0 to 9 to spirals (S0/a--Sm), and
T = 10 to Magellanic irregulars (Im).  T = 90 designates non-Magellanic
irregulars or ``amorphous'' galaxies (I0; Sandage \& Brucato 1979), and T = 99
imples a ``peculiar'' morphology that cannot be fitted into any of the above
categories.  Among spirals, those that are strongly or weakly barred are
designated by the family symbols ``B'' and ``AB,'' respectively, and nonbarred
members by ``A''.  Note that the morphological types given in Paper II were
taken from the catalog of nearby galaxies of Kraan-Korteweg (1986), which
relies heavily on the RSA.  In future analyses, we will use the morphological
types from the RC3 as listed in Table 10, instead of those from the RSA given
in Paper II, largely because the RC3 system recognizes intermediate bar types
(AB), but also because it is more current.

The distribution of Hubble types for the survey sample is summarized in
Table 13 and in Figure 17.  It is apparent that the sample contains virtually
every morphological type, and hence provides an excellent representation of the
general galaxy population. Since the objects were drawn from a
magnitude-limited catalog, however, our sample certainly is not immune to the
usual underrepresentation of low surface brightness systems.  Ellipticals
comprise 12\% of the sample, while lenticulars, spirals, irregulars, and
peculiar systems make up 18\%, 65\%, 3\%, and 1.5\%, respectively.  Barred
galaxies (AB and B) contribute 56\% to the disk systems (S0--Im) and
59\% of the spiral galaxies in the sample, roughly comparable to the overall
representation in the field galaxy population (50\%--60\%; Sellwood \&
Wilkinson 1993).

\subsection{Distances}
The majority of the objects in our survey (90\%) overlap with the nearby
galaxy catalog of Tully (1988), who derived distances for galaxies
closer than 40 Mpc based on the Virgo infall model of Tully \& Shaya (1984).
This model assumes an infall velocity of 300 ~km~s$^{-1}$\ for the Local Group,
$H_0$ = 75 ~km~s$^{-1}$\ Mpc$^{-1}$, and a Virgo distance of 16.8 Mpc.  Although some
of the galaxy distances have been slightly modified in the recent literature,
we chose to adopt Tully's distances for convenience and for internal
consistency.  For galaxies farther than 40 Mpc, we obtained distances
simply from their systemic velocities and $H_o$ = 75 ~km~s$^{-1}$\ Mpc$^{-1}$.  The
distribution of distances in our survey (Fig. 18) has a median value of
17.9 Mpc, a mean of 22.8 Mpc, and a standard deviation of 14.9 Mpc.  The
aperture used in the spectral extractions (2$^{\prime\prime}$\ $\times$ 4$^{\prime\prime}$)
corresponds to a projected linear size of 180 pc $\times$ 360 pc for the
median distance.  The radial velocities of the galaxy nuclei, which are
available from our data, will be presented elsewhere along with additional
kinematic data.

\subsection{Radial Velocities and Rotational Velocities}
The heliocentric radial velocities, $v_{\rm h}$, are listed in column 4
of Table 10; these were taken from the RC3, after converting the values
given therein in the frame of the Galactic Standard of Rest to the frame
of the Sun.  They represent the weighted average of the best available
redshifts measured through 21-cm neutral hydrogen and optical observations.
The \ion{H}{1}\ redshifts for the Palomar sample have typical uncertainties of
$\sim$6 ~km~s$^{-1}$, while the optical measurements have somewhat larger ones,
generally $\sim$30 ~km~s$^{-1}$.  A histogram of $v_{\rm h}$ is shown in Figure 19.

The amplitude of the rotation curve of a spiral galaxy provides a
measure of its gravitational potential, and hence its total mass.
Previous studies of Seyfert galaxies successfully employed the rotational
amplitude to assess the role of the bulge in influencing the nuclear
activity (e.g., Whittle 1992b), and we plan to do the same for the objects
in this survey.  Although our spectra were acquired in long-slit mode, the
spectrograph was usually not rotated to the photometric major axis of each
galaxy, but rather to the parallactic angle to minimize light losses due to
atmospheric dispersion (see Paper II).  Hence, only some of the resulting
rotation curves (to be published elsewhere) can be used to derive reliable
rotation amplitudes.  Fortunately, it has been demonstrated (e.g., Rubin,
Ford, \& Thonnard 1978; Whittle 1992a) that the maximum rotational velocity
inferred from the width of the integrated \ion{H}{1}\ emission profile of spiral
galaxies provides an excellent substitute for the rotational amplitude obtained
through direct analysis of an optical rotation curve.  Whittle (1992a) showed
that W20, the width of the \ion{H}{1}\ profile measured at 20\% of the peak height,
correlates extremely well with $\Delta$V$_{\rm rot}$, the amplitude of the
optical rotation curve, and that the correlation apparently holds
for both normal and
active galaxies.  Accordingly, we have taken the available W20 measurements
from the RC3 for our survey objects (largely based on the \ion{H}{1}\ database of
Bottinelli {et al. } 1990), and these are tabulated as  $\Delta$V$_{\rm HI}$ in
Table 10.  Since the rotational velocities are seen in projection along the
line of sight, the true, inclination-corrected rotational amplitudes
$\Delta$V$^c_{\rm rot}$ = $\Delta$V$_{\rm HI}/$sin $i$ are also listed for
all the disk systems, where we have used the inclinations given in
Table 11 (see \S\ 5.8).  To ensure that the deprojection correction factor is
not excessively large, inclinations less than 30$^{\circ}$\ were set to 30$^{\circ}$.

\subsection{\ion{H}{1}\ Content}
It will be of interest to search for possible connections between the presence
and type of nuclear activity and the overall gaseous content of the host
galaxies, as some relationship may be found based on the expectation that
the availability of interstellar matter should affect the fueling rate of
the nuclear regions.  Since the RC3 conveniently lists \ion{H}{1}\ fluxes for the
majority of the non-elliptical galaxies in our survey, we summarize the
\ion{H}{1}\ masses in Table 10, normalized to the ``corrected'' $B$-band luminosity
(see \S\ 5.6) of each object, $M_{\rm HI}/L^0_B$, where in converting
magnitudes to luminosities a solar absolute magnitude of $M_B$ = 5.52 was
used.  The calculation of the \ion{H}{1}\ mass from the observed \ion{H}{1}\ fluxes is
explained in the RC3, and, in the present compilation, we simply adopted the
fluxes given in the RC3, which account for self-absorption of the 21-cm line.
Note that the quantity $M_{\rm HI}/L^0_B$ is independent of distance.

\subsection{Galaxy Environment}
That tidal perturbations from neighboring galaxies can trigger the onset of
nuclear activity as well as enhance its strength has been documented in
numerous studies (e.g., Shlosman 1994 and references therein).  For each
galaxy, we attempt to gauge the gravitational influence of its nearest
neighbors using two estimators.  First, we make use of the local galaxy
density, $\rho_{\rm gal}$, defined by Tully (1988) as the density of all
galaxies
brighter than $M_B$ = --16 mag in the vicinity of the object of interest.  A
second, more straightforward approach that has proven to be useful in the
past (e.g., Stauffer 1982b) is to measure the separation between a given
galaxy and that of its nearest, sizable neighbor.  A reasonable strategy might
be to locate a neighbor meeting a relative magnitude criterion ($\Delta m$),
as well as a relative velocity criterion ($\Delta v$).  The former selects
neighbors falling within a given luminosity ratio, which loosely translates
into a mass ratio if the luminosity is not abnormally enhanced or depressed,
whereas the latter increases the probability that the pair is actually
physically associated.  We chose $\Delta m\,\leq 1.5$ mag (factor of 4 in
luminosity) and $\Delta v\,=\,\pm$500 ~km~s$^{-1}$, and we performed an automated
search  using the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) to measure
$\theta_p$, the projected angular separation between the primary and the
secondary galaxy, measured in units of the isophotal angular diameter of
the primary, $D_{25}$ (Table 11, col. 11).  The search radius was limited
to 300$^\prime$, the maximum value allowed by the NED search routine; beyond this
limit the galaxy can be safely considered to be isolated.

Finally, we consider the environment of each galaxy in a larger context, namely
its group and cluster membership.  Garcia (1993) recently analyzed
the group affiliation for a large sample of nearby galaxies, whose selection
criteria encompasses those of the Palomar survey.  More than 66\% (323/486)
of our objects can be assigned to specific groups, and they are identified in
Table 10 using the group designation of Garcia.  Those objects belonging to the
Virgo Cluster or its southern extension (Tully 1987) are additionally noted.

\subsection{Magnitudes and Colors}
The total (asymptotic) $B$-band magnitudes, as observed ($B_T$) and after
correcting for extinction and redshift ($B_T^0$), were taken from the RC3
and are listed in Table 11.  The two dominant terms in the magnitude
correction are due to internal extinction ($A_i$), which depends on
inclination and is assumed to be significant only for spirals (see RC3), and
extinction from the Galaxy, $A_g$, which was estimated principally from the
\ion{H}{1}\ maps of Burstein \& Heiles (1982, 1984).  Because of the proximity of
our sample, the redshift ($K$) correction in almost all cases amounts to less
than 0.01 mag.  The absolute magnitudes, $M_{B_T}^0$ = $B_T^0\,-$ 5 log
($d$/10) [$d$ in pc], are derived from the apparent magnitudes and assumed
distances.  The distributions of $B_T$ and $M_{B_T}^0$ are shown in Figures 20
and 21, respectively.

We also present in Table 11 two broad-band optical colors taken from the RC3,
$(U-B)_T^0$ and $(B-V)_T^0$, integrated over the galaxy and corrected for
the effects of extinction and redshift as described above.  These quantities
will be of use for examining global trends in the star-forming properties
of the host galaxies.

\subsection{Bulge Luminosities}
The mass of the galactic bulge or spheroidal component most likely exerts the
strongest impact on nuclear activity, as the central engine undoubtedly
is coupled to the depth of the nuclear gravitational potential.  To first
order, such an association is already apparent in that AGNs preferentially
reside in early-type hosts (Heckman 1980a; Keel 1983b; Terlevich, Melnick,
\& Moles 1987; Ho {et al. } 1997a), in that the kinematics of the line-emitting
gas reflect principally the velocities of the bulge stars (Nelson \& Whittle
1996), and in the preliminary indication that more massive black holes appear
to live in more luminous galaxies (Kormendy \& Richstone 1995).  While an
explicit bulge-disk decomposition would certainly be desirable, at the moment
detailed surface photometry is unavailable for our sample as a whole.  We
follow Whittle (1992a) and use an average, type-dependent relation to estimate
the bulge luminosity from the total galaxy luminosity.  Simien \& de
Vaucouleurs (1986) give the following empirical relation to estimate the
contribution of the disk to the total luminosity of a disk galaxy with
--3 $\leq$ T $\leq$ 7: $\Delta m_{\rm bul}$ = 0.324(T + 5) -- 0.054(T + 5)$^2$
+ 0.0047(T + 5)$^3$.  This correction is zero for ellipticals (T = --6 to --4),
which by definition have no disks, and it equals 1.02 mag for T = +1 (Sa) and
2.54 mag for T = +5 (Sc).  In this study, we assume that the empirical
relation can be extended to T = 9; for T $>$ 9, $\Delta m_{\rm bul}$ is
undefined.  The bulge absolute magnitudes, $M_B$(bul) = $M_{B_T}^0$ +
$\Delta m_{\rm bul}$, are listed in Table 11 and shown in histogram form in
Figure 22.

\subsection{Inclinations and Isophotal Diameters}

It is instructive to examine the distribution of galaxy inclination angles
to assess possible selection effects.  Figure 23 shows the distribution of
cosine $i$ for all sample disk galaxies for which the RC3 lists an isophotal
axial ratio, $R_{25}$ = log($a/b$), where the major and minor axis diameters,
$a$ and $b$, are measured at a $B$ surface brightness level of 25 mag
arcsec$^{-2}$.  The inclination then follows from sin$^2 i\,=\,
[1 - (b/a)^2]/0.96$ (Hubble 1926).  The distribution of cosine $i$ should be
flat for an unbiased sample with random orientations.  Our sample evidently
is not completely free from inclination bias, as judged by the increasing
deficit of objects for $i$ ${_>\atop^{\sim}}$  70$^{\circ}$; the departure from a uniform
distribution is highly significant according to a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test
(Press {et al. } 1986).  This behavior, however, is to be expected in a
magnitude-limited sample, since internal absorption tends to shift edge-on
disk systems above the limiting magnitude (e.g., Burstein, Haynes, \& Faber
1991; Maiolino \& Rieke 1995).

We also extracted from the RC3 the isophotal major axis diameters
(measured at $\mu_B$ = 25 mag arcsec$^{-2}$), both as observed ($D_{25}$)
and corrected to face-on orientation ($D^0_{25}$).  This parameter will be
used as a measure of the linear scale of the systems.

\subsection{Far-infrared Properties}

Finally, we collected the best available far-IR
measurements of the host galaxies made by the {\it Infrared Astronomical
Satellite (IRAS)}.  These data will be used to analyze the global
star-formation properties of the galaxies.  The total flux densities
($S_{12}$, $S_{25}$, $S_{60}$, and $S_{100}$) and the associated errors
($\sigma$) of the four bands at 12, 25, 60, and 100 \hbox{$\mu$m}, all in units of
Janskys, are given in columns 2 through 9 of Table 12.  The parameter
$FIR$ (col. 10), defined as 1.26\e{-14}(2.58$S_{60}\,+\,S_{100}$) W m$^{-2}$,
approximates well the total flux between 42.5 and 122.5 \hbox{$\mu$m}\
(Rice {et al. } 1988; Helou {et al. } 1988).  For convenience, we also tabulated the
the ratios of the flux densities of the four bands, or the far-IR colors:
$S_{12}/S_{25}$, $S_{25}/S_{60}$, and $S_{60}/S_{100}$ (cols. 11--13).

Many catalogs of {\it IRAS} data exist in the literature.  We have strived
to adopt the largest, most homogeneous, and most recent compilations
available.  Flux densities for galaxies with diameters larger than 8$^\prime$\
were taken from Rice {et al. } (1988), and the remaining ones were chosen, in
decreasing order of preference, from Helou {et al. } (1988), Soifer {et al. } (1989),
Knapp {et al. } (1989), Rush, Malkan, \& Spinoglio (1993), and Moshir {et al. }
(1990), the latter as given in NED.  Additional studies (col. 14) were
consulted for a few objects not listed in the above primary sources.  (The
published version of the Rush et al. catalog did not list uncertainties for
the flux densities.  B. Rush kindly provided the original data files
from which we extracted the uncertainty measurements.)

\section{Summary}

In an effort to search for and to study the physical properties of
low-luminosity AGNs, we have completed an optical spectroscopic survey of
the nuclear regions of a large sample of nearby galaxies.  The survey is useful
for many other purposes in addition to the original objectives.  This paper
describes in detail our procedure of measuring various spectroscopic
parameters to characterize the emission lines, the absorption lines,
and the stellar continuum.  From analysis of the emission-line intensity
ratios, spectral classifications are presented for a total of 418
emission-line nuclei.  We discuss in depth our procedure for starlight
subtraction, as this is a crucial step for accurate measurement of the
relatively weak emission lines in these nuclei.  Finally, we provide a
summary of global galaxy properties compiled from various published catalogs.
This information will be used extensively in other papers in this series,
where the scientific analysis will be presented.

\acknowledgments

The research of L.~C.~H. is currently funded by a postdoctoral fellowship
from the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.  Financial support for
this work was provided by NSF grants AST-8957063 and AST-9221365, as well as
by NASA grants AR-5291-93A and AR-5792-94A from the Space Telescope Science
Institute (operated by AURA, Inc., under NASA contract NAS5-26555).  We thank
Hans-Walter Rix for generously providing the code used for the starlight
subtraction and Chien Peng for developing the software used for the
line-profile fitting. Brian Rush gave valuable advice concerning {\it IRAS}
data and sent us an electronic version of the extended 12 \hbox{$\mu$m}\ galaxy
catalog.  Anne Manuelle Garcia furnished an electronic file of
her catalog of galaxy groups.  Chris McKee and Hy Spinrad gave a critical
reading of an earlier draft of the manuscript, and helpful input during the
final revision of the paper was provided by Bill Keel, Kim McLeod,
Roberto Maiolino, and an anonymous referee. Throughout the course of this
work, L.~C.~H. has benefited from discourse with Aaron Barth and Tom Matheson,
and well as from spirited consumption of caffeine with Marianne Vestergaard.
We made extensive use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED)
which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute
of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space
Administration.

\clearpage