Challenges and Opportunities for Helio- and Asteroseismology

Abstract: I consider some of the challenges and opportunities facing helio- and asteroseismology, which reflect major themes of presentation and discussion from the HELAS IV international conference "Seismological Challenges for Stellar Structure". I concentrate in particular on the exciting prospects for asteroseismology, now that the field is being provided with data of unprecedented quality and in unprecedented volumes.

\section{Introduction}
 \label{sec:intro}

The HELAS IV international conference ``Seismological Challenges for
Stellar Structure'' marked the successful conclusion of the
European-Commission Sixth Framework Programme (FP6) phase of the
European Helio- and Asteroseismology Network, ``HELAS''.  The
international helioseismology and asteroseismology communities have
benefited from HELAS in many significant ways: HELAS has supported a
diverse program of meetings and workshops, providing forums for
facilitating international collaboration, the exchange of knowledge
and expertise, and the development of new techniques for analyzing the
increasing volumes of high-quality data (with resulting benefits in
particular regarding provision of training of graduate students and
young scientists in the field).

Much has changed since the first HELAS international conference was
held at the University of Sheffield in 2006. Notable progress was then
being made in asteroseismology, thanks to ongoing programs of
episodic, ground-based telescope campaigns, observations by the MOST
microsatellite, and the successful exploitation of the WIRE
star-tracker data for asteroseismic studies. In helioseismology,
important developments continued thanks to data being collected by the
suite of helioseismic instruments on the ESA/NASA SoHo spacecraft, and
by the ground-based Birmingham Solar-Oscillations Network (BiSON).
CoRoT had not yet been launched, although that event was only a few
months away. The asteroseismology programme of the NASA Kepler mission
-- what would become the Kepler Asteroseismology Investigation (KAI)
-- was still in the early stages of being formulated. And the Sun was
heading towards its next solar minimum, with no unusual behaviour
forecast for that upcoming period.

Fast-forward to 2010, and the picture is much altered. CoRoT (Michel
et al. 2008) and Kepler (Gilliland et al. 2010) are now providing
stellar photometric data of unprecedented quality and length for
asteroseismology, and in unprecedented volumes. It is no
understatement to say that these missions are revolutionizing the
field. One of the highlights of the HELAS~IV conference was a special
session devoted to first asteroseismology results from Kepler,
spanning solar-like stars (Christensen-Dalsgaard et al. 2010; Chaplin
et al. 2010), red giants (Bedding et al. 2010), $\delta$-Scuti and
$\gamma$-Dor pulsators (Grigahc\`ene et al. 2010), and oscillations in
open clusters (Stello et al. 2010) and eclipsing binaries (Hekker et
al. 2010).

With regards to the Sun, there has of course been the unusually deep
and extended solar minimum between cycles 23 and 24, and
helioseismology has cast important light on this unusual
behaviour. The SoHo spacecraft is now almost at the end of its
operational life, and its helioseismic imaging capabilities have very
recently been superseded by the HMI instrument on board NASA's Solar
Dynamics Observatory (SDO), which was launched in 2010 February; while
the CNES PICARD satellite was launched in 2010 June.

My objective in this review is to comment on some of the opportunities
and challenges facing helio- and asteroseismology in the next few
years. I follow the tenor, emphasis and focus of presentation and
discourse at the HELAS~IV conference, and I have used results on
highlights from the meeting to illustrate and set the context of my
discussion. I have grouped the highlights into a few overarching
themes (reflecting of course my personal views on what were the main
themes of the meeting). Because I have had to be selective the list of
issues I present is by no means exhaustive, but hopefully provides a
fair reflection of the meeting.

I begin close to home, with the Sun, and the unusual recent solar
minimum.

\section{The Unusual Solar Minimum}
\label{sec:min}

The unusual behaviour during the current solar minimum of many
diagnostics and probes of solar activity has raised considerable
interest and debate in the scientific community (e.g., see the summary
by Sheeley 2010). The minimum has been unusually, and unexpectedly,
extended and deep. Polar magnetic fields have been very weak, and the
open flux has been diminished compared to other recent minima.

Helioseismology has been used to probe the behaviour of sub-surface
flows during the solar minimum. Howe et al. (2009) found that the
equatorward progression of the lower branches of the so-called
torsional oscillations (east-west flows) was late in starting compared
to previous cycles. They flagged this delayed migration as a possible
pre-cursor of the delayed onset of cycle 24. The meridional
(north-south) flow also carries a signature of the solar cycle, which
converges toward the active-region latitudes and also intensifies in
strength as activity increases. Gonz\'alez-Hern\'andez (2010) found
that during the current minimum this component had developed to
detectable levels even before the visual onset of magnetic activity on
the solar surface.

The globally coherent acoustic properties of the recent solar minimum
have been studied extensively with low-degree p modes (by Broomhall et
al. 2009 and Salabert et al. 2009) and medium-degree p modes (Tripathy
et al. 2010). These studies have shown that while the surface proxies
of activity (e.g., the 10.7-cm radio flux) were quiescent and very
stable during the minimum, the p-mode frequencies showed much more
variability. Tripathy et al. (2010) noted further surprising behaviour
compared to the previous minimum, i.e., an apparent anti-correlation
of the p-mode frequency shifts and the surface proxies of activity,
during the epoch covered by the current minimum.

Broomhall et al. (2009) had suggested the possible presence of a
quasi-biennial modulation of the frequencies of the low-degree modes,
superimposed upon the well-established $\sim 11$-yr variation of the
frequencies. This has since been confirmed by further in-depth
analysis, which reveals a signature that is consistent in the
frequencies extracted from BiSON and GOLF data (Fletcher et al. 2010).
The fact that this biennial signature has similar amplitude in the
low-frequency \emph{and} the high-frequency modes used in this
analysis suggests that its origins lie deeper than the very
superficial layers responsible for the 11-year shifts.

With regards to the recent solar minimum, the challenge now is to try
to make sense of the unusual behaviour revealed by the helioseismic
data, and to follow the acoustic signatures and flows as the Sun
emerges from the minimum.  An important avenue of investigation will
be to compare results with those from the previous minimum, e.g., by
direct analysis of the differences of the frequencies observed at the
two epochs (Basu et al. 2010).

\section{Ensemble Seismology}
\label{sec:ensemble}

Kepler and CoRoT are providing exciting new opportunities to conduct
\emph{ensemble seismology} thanks to the large number of stars being
observed. (In the spirit of the Greek \emph{asteroseismology}, we
might be tempted to instead adopt the phrase
\emph{synasteroseismology}.) The prospects for solar-like stars are
particularly exciting. The large, homogeneous Kepler ensemble will for
the first time allow a proper seismic survey of a population of
solar-type field stars to be made. A statistical survey of trends in
important seismic parameters will allow tests of basic scaling
relations, comparisons with trends predicted from modelling, and lead
to important insights on the detailed modeling of stars. This work is
now in progress.

One may also pick from a large ensemble pairs, small groups or
sequences of stars that share common stellar properties, e.g., mass,
composition, or surface gravity. This opens the possibility to perform
what we might call \emph{differential} (or \emph{comparative})
seismology of stars, e.g., in analyzing the selected stars one may
eliminate or suppress any dependence of the modelling or results on
the common property, or properties. By selecting, for example, a
sequence of stars of very similar mass and composition it will be
possible to produce an exceedingly accurate and robust relative age
calibration, and give the potential to map evolutionary sequences of
internal properties and structures, allowing exquisite tests of
stellar evolutionary models.  By selecting stars with very similar
surface gravities, one may potentially probe differences in
near-surface physics and convection.

Further inferences on near-surface physics may potentially be acquired
by differential seismic analyses of simultaneous observations of the
same star made in photometry and Doppler velocity. For example, there
is the exciting prospect of our having simultaneous data on the
solar-type binary 16~Cyg from observations made in photometry by
Kepler and in Doppler velocity by the Stellar Observations Network
Group (SONG) (Grundahl et al. 2009). The opportunities for collecting
simultaneous data in photometry and Doppler velocity may be limited in
the near future to only a small number of stars, and as such it also
behoves us to look for twins of Kepler and CoRoT stars in data already
collected by ground-based telescopes.

Finally, even when stars do not share common properties, comparative
seismology still has the potential to aid accurate mode
identification, without which inferences drawn from the seismic data
would be greatly limited (e.g., see Bedding \& Kjeldsen 2010).

Notable successes for CoRoT have come from asteroseismic studies of
red giants. Data on large numbers of stars observed in the exoplanet
channel reveal ubiquitous signatures of red-giant oscillations.
Studies of this ensemble have shown clear observational evidence for
new seismic scaling relations (e.g., Hekker et al. 2009, Mosser et
al. 2010) predicted by theory (Stello et al. 2009a). The studies are
being extended to make inference on the red-giant population -- which
is dominated for the CoRoT sample by red-clump stars -- and to thereby
use the ensemble to test population synthesis models of the evolution
of the galaxy (Miglio et al. 2009).

CoRoT also revealed clear, unambiguous evidence for non-radial modes
in many of the red-giant stars (De~Ridder et al. 2009). This general
property has been confirmed and inferences from it extended by Kepler
observations of red giants. Bedding et al. (2010) reported results on
low-luminosity (H-shell burning) red giants, exploiting the ensemble
properties of the stars by presenting the seismic spectra in so-called
scaled, and semi-scaled, \'echelle diagrams (Bedding \& Kjeldsen
2010). These diagrams reveal clear ridges due to radial \emph{and}
non-radial modes, and show that for these stars the displacements in
frequency of the $l=1$ modes from the midpoints of the adjacent $l=0$
modes are negative in sign, unlike the positive displacements seen in
many main-sequence stars; moreover, the large width in frequency of
the $l=1$ ridge is likely due to mixed modes (see Montalb\'an et
al. (2010) for theoretical discussion of both issues).

Observations of classical $\delta$-Scuti and $\gamma$-Dor pulsators
have provided further opportunities for ensemble studies by
Kepler. Analysis revealed that nearly all members of the observed
ensemble were hybrid pulsators, showing both types of oscillation
(Grigahc\`ene et al. 2010). This unexpected result has implications
for how the stars are classified, and also for the theoretical
descriptions of the excitation of the modes.

Another obvious application of ensemble seismology is in the study of
oscillating stars in clusters. These stars of course share a common
history and, to within small uncertainties, may be regarded as lying
at the same distance. Stello et al. (2010) reported on oscillations of
red giants observed in one of the open clusters (NGC6819) in the
Kepler field. They found that the asteroseismic parameters could be
used to test cluster membership of the stars, i.e., by comparing the
observed frequency of maximum mode power with the frequency predicted
from the locations of the stars in the cluster colour-magnitude
diagram. In spite of having only limited data to hand when the study
was made, it was already possible to identify four possible
non-members despite those stars having a better than 80\,\% membership
probability from radial velocity measurements.

Opportunities also exist for using ground-based observations to
perform ensemble seismology of clusters. Saesen et al. (2010) have
studied classical pulsations of $\beta$\,Cephei stars in the open
cluster NGC6910. When cluster members are ordered by intrinsic
brightness, a clear systematic progression of the detected oscillation
periods is revealed, just like that seen in the NGC6819 red
giants. This suggests that simple inspection of the oscillation
spectra of the ensemble of classical pulsators may be used to diagnose
cluster membership, like the oscillation spectra of solar-like
pulsators in Stello et al. (2010).

There are also opportunities for applying ensemble approaches in
helioseismic studies, an obvious example being in the use of local
helioseismology data products. Komm \& Hill (2009) used local
helioseismology to perform an ensemble study of 1009 active regions.
They measured the subsurface flow properties beneath the regions, and
a statistical analysis of the results showed that the inferred
vorticity of the flows could help to distinguish flaring and
non-flaring active regions, discrimination that would not be possible
using, for example, X-ray flux data. Ensemble local helioseismology
has also been used to study differences (again, in a statistical
sense) in the properties found beneath active and quiet-Sun regions
(e.g., see Komm, Howe \& Hill 2009).

\section{New Data -- New Diagnostics, New Challenges}
\label{sec:diag}

With new data of unprecedented quality and length come new challenges
for data analysis, and new opportunities for making accurate and
precise inference on the stellar properties that were not possible
with older, inferior data products. There is the potential to develop
and apply new diagnostic data analysis tools to ensure that
contemporary data are exploited to their full potential. However,
incumbent on the scientist in any such endeavour is to understand the
limitations and biases inherent in those tools, dependent on the
quality of data that is available.

New asteroseismic data from the likes of Kepler and CoRoT, and new
helioseismic data from the likes of SDO and PICARD, will naturally
drive developments in data analysis. A useful strategy to help in
development and testing of analysis tools is to apply those tools to
artificial data. The data must of course be realistic, and due care
must be taken when applying conclusions drawn to results on real
data. Nevertheless, tests like these can be extremely instructive --
even vital -- in aiding, and steering appropriately, the development
of new tools; and for avoiding over-interpretation of results on real
data.

Inference from local helioseismology requires intensive work on
modelling of the propagation of acoustic waves in the presence of
magnetic fields. Realistic numerical simulations play a key r\^ole in
these studies (e.g., see Schunker (2010) and references
therein). Cameron et al. (2010) made numerical simulations of wave
propagation through cylindrically symmetric model sunspots, and found
good qualitative agreement between the modelled seismic signature and
the observed signature of the sunspot in active region NOAA~9787.

In asteroseismology, the asteroFLAG collaboration (Chaplin et
al. 2008) has been very active developing tools for application to
solar-like oscillators. A particular focus has been to develop tools
for automated analysis of many stars to meet the demands of the
Kepler survey phase, which will ultimately provide data on more than
1000 solar-like stars. The first application of some of these tools to
three bright, solar-like Kepler targets was reported in Chaplin et
al. (2010).  The collaboration has also tested methods for estimating
radii of solar-like stars (Stello et al. 2009b), using artificial
Kepler-like data.  The main goal of the Kepler Mission is to
characterize extrasolar planetary systems, particularly Earth-like
planets in the habitable zones of their host stars, and accurate and
precise stellar radii are required to constrain the sizes of the
detected exoplanets. Christensen-Dalsgaard et al. (2010) report the
first application of asteroseismology to known planet-hosting stars in
the Kepler field.

CoRoT data on F-type solar-like oscillators have challenged
pre-conceived ideas of how asteroseismic data are analysed
(Appourchaux et al. 2008; Barban et al. 2009; Garc\'ia et al. 2009;
Mosser et al. 2009). The large mode linewidths uncovered in these
stars forced modifications to ``peak bagging'' strategies for
extracting estimates of the mode parameters, and have posed challenges
for angular degree identification. Tests on artificial data are a
vital pre-requisite for improving the analysis applied to these stars
(e.g., see Benomar et al. 2009).

Experiments with artificial data on rapidly rotating intermediate and
high-mass stars have proven particularly instructive for helping to
understand the appearance of the observed classical oscillation
spectra in the presence of rapid rotation (Ballot et al. 2010a). The
impact of rapid rotation also cannot be ignored in some solar-like
oscillators, i.e., in young F-type stars. Here, modelling of the
seismic spectra must also account for second-order terms, which are
usually neglected in any analysis (Ballot 2010b).

Regions of stellar interiors where the structure changes abruptly
perturb the frequencies or periods of the oscillations (e.g., see
Houdek \& Gough 2007).  The characteristics of the signatures imposed
on the oscillations depend on the properties and locations of the
regions of abrupt structural change.  When the regions lie well within
the mode cavities, the near regular spacing of modes in frequency (for
p modes) or period (for g modes) are given periodic
displacements. There are, for example, signatures left by the
ionization of helium in the near-surface layers of solar-like stars.
Measurement of these signatures allows tight constraints to be placed
on the helium abundance, something that would not otherwise be
possible in such cool stars (because the ionization temperatures are
too high to yield usable photospheric lines for spectroscopy). There
are also signatures left by the locations of convective boundaries. It
is therefore possible to pinpoint the lower boundaries of convective
envelopes in cool stars. These regions are believed to play a key
r\^ole in stellar dynamos, and so this information is of great
importance to stellar dynamo modelers.

The key to extracting the signatures in solar-type stars is to have
sufficient precision in estimates of the mode frequencies. Multi-month
datasets are required, and tests undertaken with artificial
asteroseismic data (or real Sun-as-a-star helioseismic data) are
essential for elucidating diagnostic limits under different data
quality scenarios (e.g., see the tests undertaken by Basu et al. 2004;
Ballot, Turck-Chi\'eze \& Garc\'ia 2004; and Verner, Elsworth \&
Chaplin 2006). Mazumdar \& Michel (2010) report attempts to extract
periodic signatures from CoRoT frequency data on the F-type solar-like
star HD49933.

Frequencies of classical pulsations may be measured to much higher
precision than their intrinsically damped, solar-like
cousins. However, only recently has the first evidence been presented
(by Degroote et al. 2010) for a periodic displacement of the g-mode
frequencies of a classical pulsator (the B3V star HD50230). It was the
almost unbroken sequence of multi-month observations made by the CoRoT
spacecraft that provided the data quality necessary to uncover the
signal in the g-mode periods. This signal is thought to be a signature
(e.g., due to mixing) from the boundary of the convective core and
radiative envelope.

When regions of abrupt structural change do not lie well within the
mode cavities, the signatures they leave are more subtle. This is the
case for the signatures left by small convective cores in solar-type
stars slightly more massive than the Sun (Cunha \& Metcalfe 2007). The
measurement of the frequency dependence of prominent frequency
separations of the low-degree modes provides a potential diagnostic of
both the presence and size of a convective core (Brand\~ao \& Cunha,
2010). The mixing implied by the convective cores, and the possibility
of mixing of fresh hydrogen fuel into the nuclear burning cores --
courtesy of the regions of overshoot -- affects the main-sequence
lifetimes. Tests on artificial seismic data are essential to
understand the prospects, and potential limitations, for inference on
convective cores.

Finally, we touch on the diagnostic potential of avoided crossings
(Osaki 1975; Aizenman et al. 1977) in solar-like stars.  These avoided
crossings are a tell-tale indicator that the stars have evolved
significantly. In young solar-type stars there is a clear distinction
between the frequency ranges that will support acoustic (pressure, or
p) modes and buoyancy (gravity, or g) modes.  As stars evolve, the
maximum buoyancy (Brunt-V\"ais\"al\"a) frequency increases. After
exhaustion of the central hydrogen, the buoyancy frequency in the deep
stellar interior may increase to such an extent that it extends into
the frequency range of the high-order acoustic modes. Interactions
between acoustic modes and buoyancy modes may then lead to a series of
avoided crossings, which affect (or ``bump'') the frequencies and also
change the intrinsic properties of the modes, with some taking on
mixed p and g characteristics.

Measurement of the these avoided crossings has the potential to
provide exquisite constraints on the fundamental stellar properties.
Very little data have been available historically. Observational
evidence for avoided crossings had been uncovered in ground-based
asteroseismic data on two bright stars, $\eta$\,Boo and $\beta$~Hyi
(Christensen-Dalsgaard et al. 1995; Kjeldsen et al. 1995; Bedding et
al. 2007; Do\u{g}an et al. 2009).  Deheuvels et al. (2009) have also
recently reported evidence for avoided crossings in CoRoT observations
of the G-type star HD49385, with Deheuvels \& Michel (2009) using an
elegant analysis on coupled oscillators to discuss the results.
Kepler now promises dramatic changes in this area, because within the
large Kepler ensemble of solar-like oscillators there is a clear
selection of stars showing avoided crossings.  One of the three
solar-like stars selected for the first Kepler paper on solar-like
oscillators -- KIC~11026764 -- is a beautiful case in point, and has
been the subject of further in-depth study (Metcalfe et al. 2010). The
data provided by Kepler will by necessity drive developments in
analysis to allow the diagnostic potential of avoided crossings to be
fully exploited.

\acknowledgements

The author would like to thank the SOC and LOC of the HELAS~IV
conference for their kind invitation to present the summary of the
meeting. He acknowledges financial support from both HELAS, and the UK
Science Technology and Facilities Council (STFC), and thanks
C.~Constantinidou and B.~A.~Miller for useful advice concerning Greek
naming.

Solar and Stellar Astrophysics (astro-ph.SR)


Evidence for the Wave Nature of an Extreme Ultraviolet Wave Observed by the Atmospheric Imaging Assembly Onboard the Solar Dynamics Observatory

Abstract: Extreme Ultraviolet (EUV) waves have been found for about 15 years. However, significant controversy remains over their physical natures and origins. In this paper, we report an EUV wave that was accompanied by an X1.9 flare and a partial halo coronal mass ejection. Using high temporal and spatial resolution observations taken by the {\em Solar Dynamics Observatory} and the Solar-TErrestrial RElations Observatory, we are able to investigate the detailed kinematics of the EUV wave. We find several arguments that support the fast-mode wave scenario: (1) The speed of the EUV wave (570 km/s) is higher than the sound speed of quiet-Sun corona. (2) Significant deceleration of the EUV wave (-130 m/s2) is found during its propagation. (3) The EUV wave resulted in the oscillations of a loop and a filament along its propagation path, and a reflected wave from the polar coronal hole is also detected. (4) Refraction or reflection effect is observed when the EUV wave was passing through two coronal bright points. (5) The dimming region behind the wavefront stopped to expand when the wavefront started to become diffuse. (6) The profiles of the wavefront exhibited a dispersive nature, and the magnetosonic Mach number of the EUV wave derived from the highest intensity jump is about 1.4. In addition, triangulation indicates that the EUV wave propagated within a height range of about 60-100 Mm above the photosphere. We propose that the EUV wave observed should be a nonlinear fast-mode magnetosonic wave that propagated freely in the corona after it was driven by the CME expanding flanks during the initial period.

\section{INTRODUCTION}
The globally propagating wave-like disturbances in the solar corona were firstly reported by \cite{mose97}, and the detailed study was firstly presented by \cite{thom98,thom99}, based on the Extreme-ultraviolet Imaging Telescope \citep[EIT;][]{dela95} onboard the {\em SOlar and Heliospheric Observatory} \citep[{\em SOHO};][]{domi95}. Such coronal disturbances were dubbed EIT or EUV waves. The EUV waves generally appear as broad, diffuse features that form a single arc-shaped bright front on EUV difference images. They can propagate over most of the visible solar disk, and are often followed by expanding coronal dimming regions \citep{thom98}. The propagation speeds of the EUV waves are typically \speed{200--400} \citep{thom09}. Observational studies have demonstrated that some EUV waves tend to avoid magnetic structures (e.g., active regions, coronal holes, etc.) \citep[e.g.,][]{thom99,will99}. The EUV waves are usually observed to be generated at the periphery of active regions, and often associated with flares, coronal dimmings, Type II radio bursts, and coronal mass ejections (CMEs) \citep{bies02}. Statistical studies indicate that the EUV waves have a strong correlation with CMEs, but the relationship between them and flares as well as Type II radio bursts is relatively weak \citep{klas00,bies02,cliv05,chen06}. Despite extensive observational and theoretical research on the EUV waves, significant controversy remains over their physical mechanisms and origins.

Since the typical speeds of the EUV waves are higher than the quiet-Sun coronal sound speed ($c_{\rm s}\leqslant$ \speed{200}) and comparable to the local Alfv\'{e}n speed ($v_{\rm A}\leqslant$ \speed{1000}\citep{asch05}), and the EUV waves are often associated with flares and CMEs, therefore, they were initially interpreted as compressive fast-mode magnetosonic waves ($v_{\rm f}=\sqrt{c_{\rm s}^{2}+v_{\rm A}^{2}}$) driven by flares or CMEs \citep[e.g.,][]{thom98,thom99,thom00,will99,warm01,vrsn01,huds03,vrsn06,trip07}. Many authors propose that the EUV waves could be a good candidate of the counterpart of the H$\alpha$ Moreton waves \citep[e.g.,][]{more60} in the solar corona \citep{vrsn02,khan02,naru02,gilb04a,gilb04b,naru04,warm04a,warm04b,vrsn05,whit05,bala07}, which have been successfully explained as coronal fast-mode waves sweeping the chromosphere \citep{uchi68}. However, many observations demonstrate that the speeds of the EUV waves are often smaller than that of the Moreton waves. To reconcile this discrepancy, some authors argue that it can be explained by considering the deceleration of the EUV waves \citep{warm04a,warm04b}. In H$\alpha$ observations, the waves can only be observed during the early stage of the EUV wave. Whereas, in EUV observations, they can be traced to much longer distances. Therefore, the speeds measured in H$\alpha$ wavelengths are just the initial speeds of the EUV waves, which are still of high speeds. If the EUV waves propagate with a significant deceleration rate, the velocity discrepancy between the Moreton and EUV waves should be reasonable \citep{warm04a}. A number of observations indicate that the EUV waves do show the evidence for the deceleration of an order of several hundred m s$^{-2}$ \citep{vrsn02,vrsn05,warm01,warm04a,long08,vero08,pats09a,vero11}. Other characteristics in terms of a freely propagating fast-mode wave are also identified, such as the broadening of the perturbation profile and decreasing of the perturbation amplitude during the propagation period of the EUV waves \citep{warm04b,warm05b,vero10,long11a,long11b}. In addition, some observations show that the EUV waves are not always observed simultaneously in H$\alpha$ and EUV wavelengths, which might be resulted from the low magnetosonic Mach numbers of the EUV waves \citep{naru02,huds03,warm05b,warm11,kien11}. With wavelet analysis technique, \cite{ball05} showed an EUV wave with a well defined period of about 400 s and a minimum energy of $\sim 3.4 \times 10^{18}$ J, which is comparable to the energy of a nanoflare.
Occasionally, the EUV waves can occur repeatedly within a short timescale from the same source region \citep{kien11,zhen12}. For these homologous EUV waves, it is propitious to perform a quantitative analysis of the characteristic wave parameters without any limitation like changing or unknown quiet-Sun background conditions.

The EUV waves have been observed to interact with various coronal magnetic structures (e.g., filaments and coronal holes) along their propagation paths \citep{thom98,thom99,will99,eto02,vero06,gilb08,gopa09,hers11,asai12,li12}. \cite{thom99} and \cite{trip07} reported on the EUV waves that were stopped by remote coronal holes as well as near the separatrix between active regions, where they may appear as a ``stationary'' front \citep{dela99}. These observational characteristics have been confirmed by a few numerical simulations \citep{wang00,wu01,ofma02,schm10}. \cite{gopa09} found the evidence for an EUV wave that was reflected by a remote coronal hole, implying that the EUV transients are possibly a true wave. \cite{liu10} found an EUV wave that simultaneously exhibited both fast and slow wave components. In their case, the preceding slow component was overtaken by the following fast component one, and the interaction between them not only produced multiple ripples but also steeped the local amplitude of the wave. This behavior is the characteristic of a real wave. The EUV waves were also observed to interact with remote filaments, which usually caused the oscillations of filaments \citep{eto02,gilb08,asai12}. Stereoscopic observations taken by {\em Solar-TErrestrial RElations Observatory} \cite[{\em STEREO};][]{kais08} were used to study the three-dimensional kinematics of EUV waves \citep{long08,vero08,ma09,kien09,pats09a,temm11}, which improved the characterization of the EUV waves due to its relatively high temporal and spatial resolution and multi-angle observations. Triangulation studies indicate that the EUV waves are trapped in a certain layer of the solar atmosphere ranging from 80 to 100 Mm above the photosphere \citep{pats09b,kien09}. This height range is comparable to the coronal scale-height of 50--100 Mm for quiet-Sun temperatures of 1--2 MK. In addition, the evidence of angular rotation for the EUV waves during propagation has also been reported \citep{podl05,attr07}. When EUV waves occur on the disk limb, they often exhibit a dome-shaped structure that enables us to further study the relationship between the EUV waves and the associated CMEs. So far several such observations have been documented \citep{vero10,chen12,selw12}, and the authors have shown that the expanding CMEs are preceded by the EUV waves, and they thereby propose that the EUV waves are driven by the expanding CMEs. It is worth noting that the EUV waves have been applied on coronal seismology to estimate the global properties of the solar corona, assuming that the EUV waves are true waves in nature \citep[e.g.,][]{warm05a,west11,long11a}.

Although a lot of extensive observational and theoretical works have reached the conclusion that fast-mode wave models can account for the EUV waves \citep[e.g.,][]{thom98,pats09a,warm04a,warm04b,muhr10,vero10,long11a,long11b,zhen11,chen12}, many other studies show that the EUV waves are not at all waves in a physical sense \citep[e.g.,][]{dela99,dela00,fole03,harr03,attr09,attr10,zhuk09,dai10,chen11}. \cite{dela99,dela00} proposed that the EUV waves are more related to the changes in magnetic topologies due to the eruption of CMEs than to real waves. In their following works, they proposed that the EUV waves could be interpreted as the Joule heating of the coronal plasma at the interface between the CME legs and the surrounding quiet-Sun magnetic field \citep{dela07,dela08}. Stimulated by the findings of \cite{dela99} and \cite{dela00}, a numerical field-line stretching model was also proposed to explain the EUV waves \citep{chen02,chen05}, which is based on the erupting of a flux rope and predicts a very fast super-Alfv\'{e}nic piston-driven shock preceding a slower pseudo-wave that is associated with the successive opening of the overlying magnetic field induced by the erupting flux rope. In this model, the authors argued that the fast shock might be the coronal counterpart of the Moreton wave observed in H$\alpha$ wavelengths, while the slow pseudo-wave behind the shock corresponds to the EUV wave observed in the corona. Several alternative models have also been proposed to interpret the EUV waves, such as the successive reconnection model \citep{attr07,van08}, the slow-mode wave model \citep{will06,wang09}, and the scenario that the EUV waves could be interpreted as soliton waves \citep{will07}. In addition, some authors proposed that both wave and non-wave models are required together to explain the observations and understand the complex natures of the EUV waves \citep[e.g.,][]{zhuk04,cohe09,liu10,down11,li12}. Detailed information for the characteristics and interpretations of the EUV waves can be found in several recent papers \citep[see][]{will09,warm10,gall11}.

Up to the present, both the wave and non-wave theories could not fully interpret the EUV waves. To clarity the physical nature of the EUV waves, more detailed observations with high temporal and spatial resolution data as well as theoretical studies are desirable at the present. In this paper, we present an EUV wave that occurred on September 24, 2011. It was accompanied by a {\em GOES} soft X-ray (SXR) X1.9 flare and a fast partial halo CME from the active region NOAA 11302 (N13E46). With the high temporal and spatial resolution observations taken by the {\em Solar Dynamics Observatory} ({\em SDO}) and {\em STEREO}-B instruments, we are able to analyze the wave kinematics in a great detail, seeking to find more new clues to clarify the physical natures of the EUV waves. We find several clues supporting the scenario that the EUV waves are propagating fast-mode waves in the corona. Instruments and data sets are described in Section 2, results are presented in Section 3, discussion and conclusions are given in Section 4.

\section{INSTRUMENTS AND DATA SETS}
The EUV wave occurred near the east disk limb, which means that the on-disk EUV wave could be observed from both {\em SDO} and {\em STEREO}-B directions. The Extreme Ultraviolet Imager \citep[EUVI;][]{wuel04} onboard {\em STEREO}-B has observed this event in four channels: 171, 195, 284, and 304 \AA. We only use the 195 \AA\ observations in this paper, which recorded the EUV wave with only three frames. The cadence and pixel resolutions of 195 \AA\ channel are 5 minutes and $1\arcsec.6$, respectively. The Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager \citep[HMI;][]{scho12} onboard {\em SDO} provides line-of-sight magnetograms at a 45 s cadence with a precision of 10 Gauss. The Atmospheric Imaging Assembly \citep[AIA;][]{leme12} onboard {\em SDO} has high time cadences up to 12 s and high pixel resolution of $0\arcsec.6$. It captures images of the Sun's atmosphere out to \rsun{1.3} in seven EUV and three UV-visible wavelengths. We mainly focus on the AIA observations to investigate the kinematics of the EUV wave presented in this paper due to its higher temporal and spatial resolution. On September 24, 2011, the separation angle between {\em STEREO}-B and {\em SDO} was about 96${}^{\circ}$. In addition, the {\em Reuven Ramaty High Energy Solar Spectroscopic Imager} \citep[{\em RHESSI};][]{lin02} hard X-ray (HXR) count rates and the {\em Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite} ({\em GOES}) SXR fluxes are also used. All images used in this paper are differentially rotated to a reference time (09:40:00 UT), and the solar north is up, west to the right.

\section{RESULTS}
The EUV wave was associated with a {\em GOES} X1.9 flare in NOAA AR11302 (N13E46) and a fast partial halo CME was observed by the Large Angle and Spectrometric Coronagraph Experiment \citep[LASCO;][]{brue95} onboard {\em SOHO}. The EUV wave was observed simultaneously by both {\em SDO} and {\em STEREO}-B from different viewpoints. The start, peak, and end times of the flare are 09:30, 09:39, and 10:09 UT, respectively. The fluxes of {\em GOES} SXR and {\em RHESSI} light curves in several energy bands are plotted in \fig{fig1} to show the flare. This flare was very energetic, and it appeared to be a white-light flare in the HMI continuum intensity observations. According to the SOHO LASCO CME CATALOG\footnote{http://cdaw.gsfc.nasa.gov/CME\_list}, the CME's center was at a position angle (PA) 92${}^\circ$, and its angular width was 145${}^\circ$. The application of a linear fit to the height-time points measured by S. Yashiro yields the speed of the CME to be about \speed{1936}, while the acceleration from quadratic fit is about \acc{-25}. These results confirm that fast CMEs are often associated with flares and coronal waves on the visible disk \citep{shee99}. In this paper, we mainly focus on the EUV wave using the EUV observations taken by {\em SDO}/AIA due to the high temporal and spatial resolution observations.

An overview of the EUV wave event is shown in \fig{fig2}. The propagation of the EUV wave was restricted within a conical sector of the quiet-Sun corona, in which a filament and a few bright points can be identified (indicated by the black arrows in \fig{fig2} (a) and (b)). Before the appearance of the primary wave (W2), there was another EUV wave (W1) preceding W2, which can also be observed from the AIA 193 \AA\ and 211 \AA\ running difference images. The leading edges of the wavefront of the propagating EUV waves (determined from the AIA 193 \AA\ base-difference images) at different times are overlaid on the {\em STEREO}-B 195 \AA\ image (\fig{fig2}(a)) and the SDO AIA 193 \AA\ image (\fig{fig2}(b)), where the cyan (yellow) curves represent the leading edge of the wavefront of W1 (W2), respectively. In \fig{fig2}(b), the blue curves perpendicular to the wavefront are used to obtain the time-distance diagrams for analyzing the detailed kinematics of the EUV waves, while the vertical blue line (S1) is used to detect the reflected wave from the south polar coronal hole. Note that the blue curves used to obtain the time-distance diagrams are not the great circles passing through the flare site. This technique can minimize the spherical projection effect. However, since the EUV wave presented here did not propagate along the great circles passing through the flare kernel, we define the paths that are perpendicular to the wavefronts to obtain the time-distance diagrams, which should reflect the kinematics projection for the wave in the plane of the sky.

We show the morphological evolution of the EUV wave in \fig{fig3}. Note that the insets are the AIA 193 \AA\ running difference images, which show the EUV waves clearly. Before the start of the X1.9 flare, a small plasma ejection can be identified on the AIA 193 \AA\ base-difference images. Several minutes later, a weak EUV wave (W1) preceding the plasma ejection can be observed at about 09:33:55 UT (see the inset in \fig{fig3}(a)). This wave was possibly driven by the small plasma ejection behind it. At about 09:37:07 UT, the primary EUV wave (W2) appeared clearly on the AIA 193 \AA\ difference images, which was preceded by W1 (see the inset in \fig{fig3}(b)). Obviously, the propagation of W2 was faster than that of W1, which can be identified by comparing the distance between them at different times (see the insets in \fig{fig3} and Animation1 available in the online version of the journal). During the initial stage of W2, an expanding dimming region behind the wavefront formed following the propagation of W2. The W2 wavefront during this period broadened gradually but still remained rather compact, while the propagation direction changed gradually from southeastward to westward. However, after or around 09:44 UT, while the dimming region stopped its expansion, the EUV wave still continued its propagation to an increasing distance up to the central meridian of the Sun. During this time period, the shape of the wavefront became more diffuse and the wavefront broadened a lot as seen in panel \fig{fig3}(f). These observational results suggest that the EUV wave should have been driven by the CME expanding flanks as proposed in several studies \citep{pats09a,muhr10,temm11}, in which the coronal dimming region should map the CME footprint on the solar surface, and the EUV wave can start to propagate freely after the driving of the CME expanding flanks. On the other hand, {\em STEREO}-B also catched the EUV wave, and we show the 195 \AA\ base-difference images in \fig{fig3}(g)--(i). By comparing the propagating wave in the AIA and {\em STEREO}-B observations, one can see that this wave was a surface wave that was probably trapped within a certain height in the corona. Triangulation of the EUV wave (using the procedure ``scc\_measure.pro'' developed by W. Thompson) indicates that the propagation height of this EUV wave ranges from 60 to 100 Mm above the photosphere, in agreement with the results reported by \cite{pats09b} and \cite{kien09}.

We study the kinematics of the EUV wave using the time-distance diagrams obtained along curves C2--C4 as shown in \fig{fig2}(b). The EUV wave could be observed in all EUV channels of AIA across a wide temperature range and it showed similar kinematics in these EUV channels. Here, we only show the EUV wave using the time-distance diagrams obtained from AIA 193 and 304 \AA\ base- and running difference images (see \fig{fig4}). In each time-distance diagram, the EUV wave displays as a slightly curved bright ridge. The slope of the bright ridge, which is defined as the ratio of the distance to the time within a limited period, represents the propagation speed of the EUV wave. One can see that the EUV wave could only be observed at a minimum distance of about 170 Mm from the flare kernel. In the time-distance diagram along C2, an oscillating loop can be identified after the passing of the EUV wave (see the blue arrow in \fig{fig4}(a) and the black arrow in \fig{fig3}(d)). This oscillating loop can be best seen in the AIA 171 \AA\ base-difference time-distance diagram (see \fig{fig5}(c)). It oscillated for several cycles before totally damping, and the oscillation period is about 500 s. When the EUV wave was passing through BP1, it interacted with BP1 and its propagation speed changed significantly (see the red arrows in \fig{fig4}(a)). The same effect can also be identified in the time-distance diagram along C4, where the speed of the EUV wave also changed obviously after its interaction with another bright points (BP2) (see the red arrows in \fig{fig4}(d)). The changes of the EUV wave speed might be caused by the reflection or refraction of the EUV wave at the bright points, indicating the wave nature for this EUV wave.

Both time-distance diagrams obtained from AIA 193 \AA\ base- and running difference images along C3 are shown in \fig{fig4} (b) and (c), respectively. From the base-difference time-distance diagram, one can see that the dimming region stopped its expansion at around 09:44 UT and lasted for a long time. The outer edge of the dimming region kept at a distance of about 50 Mm from the flare kernel. In the meantime, the EUV wave propagated out continuously before indiscernible on the visible disk. Besides the obvious primary wave stripe observed in the running difference time-distance diagrams, there are a few secondary wave tracks that could also be identified in the time-distance diagrams obtained from C3 and C4 (see the yellow arrows in \fig{fig4}). By checking the time-lapse movies made from the AIA observations, we find that these secondary waves were probably excited by some coronal structures when they interacted with the primary EUV wave, unlike the slow pseudo-wave predicted in the numerical model by \cite{chen02}. Along C4, the wave stripe that represents W1 can be identified in the AIA 193 \AA\ running difference time-distance diagram (see the green arrow in \fig{fig4}(d)). The speed of W1 was obviously slower than that of W2, and it was overtaken by W2 at about 09:40 UT. After that W1 was undetectable anymore. We show the interaction of the EUV wave with the filament using the AIA 304 \AA\ running difference time-distance diagram (\fig{fig4}(e)). After the passing of the primary EUV wave (W2), the filament started to oscillate for a few cycles but never erupt (see the blue arrows in \fig{fig4}(e) and \fig{fig5}(d)). The period of the oscillating filament is about 880 s. It is worth noting that the reflection of W2 by the south polar coronal hole was also observed, and we show the reflected wave in \fig{fig5}(e), which propagated northward at a speed of about \speed{156} in the plane of the sky. Here, we failed to detect the incident W2 and the interaction of W2 with the coronal hole in the time-distance diagram as shown in \fig{fig5}(e), since W2 had become very diffuse when it reached the coronal hole. However, the start time of the possibly reflected wave was consistent with the estimated arrival time of W2 to the coronal hole, and the time-lapse movie made from the AIA 193 \AA\ observations confirms the reflected wave from the polar coronal hole. Thus we believe that the detected wave along path S1 was the reflected wave of W2 from the polar coronal hole.

The speeds and accelerations of W1 and W2 in the plane of the sky are plotted in \fig{fig6}, in which the values of distance and time are determined from the time-distance diagrams shown in \fig{fig4}. The speeds and accelerations are obtained by making a linear (green line) and quadratic (red line) fit to the data sets respectively. The dotted part of each fitted line is a back-extrapolation of the fitted lines. As seen in this figure, the propagations of both W1 and W2 exhibit a significant deceleration along each cut. The speed (acceleration) of W1 is about \speed{403} (\acc{-185}). For W2, its speed ranges from \speed{492} to \speed{690} and the average value is about \speed{570}. The acceleration ranges from \acc{-37} to \acc{-220} and the average value is about \acc{-130}. According to the classification of EUV waves performed by \cite{warm11}, this EUV wave should be a nonlinear large-amplitude fast-mode wave that propagates faster than the ambient fast-mode speed and subsequently slow down due to decreasing amplitude. After the interaction of W2 with the bright points, the propagation speed of the EUV wave showed an obvious variation, of which the EUV wave accelerated (decelerated) significantly when passing through BP1 (BP2), and the propagation speed of the wave after interaction is about \speed{653} (\speed{354}) along C2 (C4). Since the propagation behavior of the EUV wave can not be distinguished on the imaging observations, we conjecture that the significant variation of the wave speed after the interaction with the bright points is caused by the changing of the propagating direction of the EUV wave during its interaction with the bright points, that is, due to the refraction or reflection effect. In addition, the speed (acceleration) of W2 along C4 at AIA 304 \AA\ is about \speed{637} (\acc{-159}), similar to the speed determined from AIA 193 \AA\ observations along the same path. The back-extrapolation of the fitted lines indicates that the initiation time of W2 should be  close to the onset time of the associated flare. This result seems to indicate a close relationship between the wave and the flare and thereby favors the scenario that EUV waves are driven by flares \citep[e.g.,][]{warm04b}. However, it is well known that the CME acceleration profile can be correlated with the flare lightcurve \citep[e.g.,][]{zhan01,temm08}. This is also consistent with the CME driven scenario of the EUV waves. In fact, the complex relationships among flares, CMEs and EUV waves are still unclear. In this sense, any apparent relation of the EUV wave onset time with the flare does not necessarily means that the flare is really related to the wave launch.

The perturbation profiles of W2 along C3 are plotted in \fig{fig7}(a)--(f). These profiles are obtained from a time-distance diagram that is made from a series of AIA 193 \AA\ ratio images, where each frame is divided by a pre-event frame. It should be noted that we only show the profiles of the EUV wave within a distance from 350 to 480 Mm from the flare kernel, where the wave was most prominent as marked by the two red ``$\times$'' symbols in \fig{fig4}(b). The propagation of the EUV wave is well reflected by the evolution of these perturbation profiles. At 09:41:55 UT, the perturbation profile is the steepest and has the highest amplitude of about 2.3, corresponding to an enhancement of 130\% above the pre-event level. In the subsequent evolution, the amplitude of the wavefront decreases continuously with time. In the meantime, the width (steepness) of the wavefront shows significant broadening (declining). In principle, the AIA 193 \AA\ channel is an optically thin emission line, and the observed intensity should be proportional to the square of the plasma density and a function related to temperature. Therefore, the enhancement of intensity can result from the increase of both density and temperature. However, since EUV waves are usually observed in a wide temperature range simultaneously, one can assume that the intensity enhancement is primarily due to plasma compression rather than temperature changing. So $I/I_{\rm 0}=2.3$ in 193 \AA\ corresponds to a density ratio $n/n_{0} \varpropto (I/I_{\rm 0})^{1/2} \sim 1.5$. We also investigate the evolution of the amplitude, the frontal full width at half maximum, and the full width of the wavefront in panels (g), (h), and (i), respectively. The amplitude first decreases linearly and then keeps at a lower level, while the width increases monotonically during the entire evolution process. These results imply that the propagating EUV wave has a dispersive nature, confirming the results of \cite{vero10}, \cite{long11b}, and \cite{long11a}. It should be noted that these characteristic parameters of the wavefront might be affected by the changes in the quiet-Sun as well as by the brightenings induced by the wavefront passage such as the so-called ``stationary brightenings'' \citep{attr07}.

\section{CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSIONS}
By combining the high temporal and spatial resolution observations taken by {\em SDO} and {\em STEREO}, we investigate the detailed kinematics of the EUV wave that occurred on September 24, 2011. The EUV wave was accompanied by a {\em GOES} X1.9 flare and a fast partial halo CME. We find that there are several main arguments supporting the scenario that the observed large-scale propagating wave-like disturbances in the corona should be a compressive fast-mode magnetosonic wave, and it was driven by the CME expanding flanks during the initial stage of the EUV wave. Our main results are summarized as follows.

\begin{enumerate}
  \item The EUV wave propagated along a conical sector region of the quiet-Sun corona and can be observed in all EUV channels of the AIA across a wide temperature range. Similar kinematics of the EUV wave in these EUV channels are identified.
  \item The EUV wave (\speed{570}) propagated faster than the coronal sound speed in the quiet-Sun corona ($c_{\rm s}\leqslant$ \speed{200}), and the propagation showed a pronounced deceleration (\acc{-130}). This kinematical behavior of the EUV wave presented in this paper is consistent with the behaviors of the nonlinear large-amplitude waves that propagate faster than the ambient fast-mode magnetosonic speed and subsequently slow down due to decreasing amplitude \citep{warm11}.
  \item The wave natures of the EUV wave presented here are reflected through its interaction with other coronal magnetic structures along its propagation path, such as the oscillation of the loop and the filament, the reflection of the EUV wave from the remote polar coronal hole, and the variation of the propagation speed of the EUV wave due to the refraction or reflection effect of the bright points. These phenomena are not consistent with those pseudo-wave models such as by \cite{dela07,dela08} or \cite{attr07}. The fact that the wave keeps propagating after the dimming has stopped to expand actually rules out the pseudo-wave models for the current event.
  \item The dimming region following the wavefront stopped to expand at about 09:44 UT and the outer edge of the dimming region kept at a distance of about 50 Mm away from the flare kernel, but the EUV wave continued propagating out for a long distance until indiscernible on the visible disk. This result supports the scenario that the EUV waves are driven by the CME expanding flanks as suggested by many studies\citep{pats09a,muhr10,temm11}, in which the dimming region maps the CME footprint on the solar surface. After the driving of the CME expanding flanks, the EUV wave started its free propagation stage, during which the wavefront became more diffuse.
  \item Triangulation indicates that the propagation height of the EUV wave ranges from 60 to 100 Mm above the photosphere, which is consistent with \cite{pats09b} and \cite{kien09}.
  \item For the characteristics of the perturbation profile of the propagating wavefront, we find that both the steepness of the wavefront's leading edge and the amplitude of the wavefront decrease continuously with time. In the meantime, the width of the perturbation profile of the wavefront broadens during its evolution process. This broadening is observed for both the full width as well as for the full width at half-maximum. These observations indicate that the propagating EUV wavefront has a dispersive nature and could be described using a wave interpretation \citep{vero10,long11a}.
\end{enumerate}

Theoretically, the formation of the 304 \AA\ line is dominated by two chromospheric \ion{He}{2} lines at 303.781 and 303.786 \AA\, but a strong contribution from a coronal \ion{Si}{11} line at 303.32 \AA\ in the 304 \AA\ passband is also important, which has a peak formation temperature $\sim1.6$ MK \citep{bros96,pats09a,long11a}. Our observational results demonstrate that the kinematics of the EUV wave in 304 \AA\ observations has a similar behavior with other EUV lines, and the propagation height (60--100 Mm) of this EUV wave is higher than the height of the chromosphere. In addition, the wave signature is undetectable at the transition region line such as 1600 \AA. Thus we propose that the EUV wave presented in this paper is just a coronal phenomenon and no chromospheric counterpart. The wave signature seen in the 304 \AA\ passband is the manifestation of the contribution of the coronal \ion{Si}{11} line rather than the chromospheric \ion{He}{2} lines.

Secondary waves were also observed behind the primary fast wave front, which looks like the pseudo-wave predicted int the hybrid model of \cite{chen02}. However, in this hybrid model, the speed of the slower pseudo-wave should be about one third of the speed of the preceding fast shock wave. In the case presented in this paper, we find that the speed of the secondary waves was just slightly smaller than that of the primary fast wave. This discrepancy stimulates us to clarify the origin of these secondary waves. By checking the time-elapse movies made from the AIA data, we find that these secondary waves were probably generated by the interaction of the primary fast wave with the coronal structures on the wave propagation path, which is inconsistent with the slower pseudo-wave predict in the hybrid model presented by \cite{chen02}.

From the the profiles of the EUV wavefront, we obtain the highest amplitude $I/I_{\rm 0}=2.3$, which yields the peak density jump at the wavefront $n/n_{0} \sim 1.5$. This corresponds to a perpendicular fast magnetosonic wave Mach number of $M_{\rm ms}=1.4$ \citep{prie82}, which implies that the EUV wave presented in this paper should be a nonlinear fast-mode magnetosonic wave, confirming the results of \cite{vero10} and \cite{kien11}. Along with the evolution of the EUV wave, its amplitude decreases and thereby the Mach number of the EUV wave also decreases and approaches to a linear regime where the Mach number is close to unity 1. Here, the results including the deceleration to a Mach number of unity, amplitude decrease, and wave front broadening are all consistent with the nonlinear fast-mode wave scenario, as pointed out by \cite{warm04b}, and recently defined as one distinct class of coronal waves by \cite{warm11}.

In summary, our analysis results indicate that the EUV wave presented in this paper should be a nonlinear fast-mode magnetosonic wave that was driven by the CME expanding flanks during the initial stage, and then it propagated freely in the solar corona within a certain height ranging from 60 to 100 Mm above the photosphere. More investigations with high temporal and spatial resolution observations would be helpful to fully understand the physical nature of such propagating large-scale wave-like disturbances in the solar atmosphere.

\acknowledgments {\em SDO} is a mission for NASA's Living With a Star (LWS) Program. We thank the {\em STEREO}/SECCHI, {\em RHESSI}, and {\em GOES} teams for data support. We also thank the anonymous referee for constructive comments and suggestions that have improved the quality of this paper. This work is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China under grants 10933003, 11078004, and 11073050, and the National Key Research Science Foundation (2011CB811400).