Transverse polarization of $Λ$ hyperons from quasireal photoproduction on nuclei

Abstract: The transverse polarization of $\Lambda$ hyperons was measured in inclusive quasireal photoproduction for various target nuclei ranging from hydrogen to xenon. The data were obtained by the HERMES experiment at HERA using the 27.6 GeV lepton beam and nuclear gas targets internal to the lepton storage ring. The polarization observed is positive for light target nuclei and is compatible with zero for krypton and xenon.

\section{ Introduction}

The transverse polarization
of ${\Lambda}$ hyperons
produced in inclusive unpolarized hadron-nucleon, hadron-nucleus, and nucleus-nucleus collisions
at high energies is a well-established phenomenon.
The polarization $P_{\rm n}^{\Lambda}$ measured in these experiments with hadron beams
is perpendicular to the production plane spanned by the momentum vectors $\vec{k}$ and
$\vec{p}$ of the beam and the
produced $\Lambda$, respectively, which is the only direction allowed by parity
conservation for an axial-vector quantity and unpolarized beams and targets .
A substantial transverse $\Lambda$
polarization was first observed in proton-beryllium
collisions at a proton-beam energy of 300~GeV \cite{Bunce}.
Since then, numerous experiments using a variety of beams and targets
have been performed to study this effect in detail.
For a review of experiments and results see, e.g., Refs.~\cite{Pondrom,Apostolos,Abramov}.
The polarization is essentially independent of the beam momentum; its magnitude
rises with $p_T$, the $\Lambda$ momentum component transverse
to the beam direction, for $p_T$
values up to about 1 GeV, where it reaches values of up to $|P_{\rm n}^{\Lambda}| \approx 0.4$;
then, it is independent of $p_T$ up to the highest measured $p_T$ values
of about 3 GeV.
At fixed $p_T$,
{\bf $|P_{\rm n}^{\Lambda}|$} rises with the Feynman variable
$x_F = p^*_L/p^*_{L,max}$, where $p^*_L$
is the component of the $\Lambda$  momentum in the beam direction measured in the beam-target
center-of-mass system and $p^*_{L,max}$ is its maximal possible value.
The transverse polarization depends only weakly on the atomic-mass number $A$ of the target
nuclei~\cite{Pondrom,Apostolos,Castillo}, whereas the polarization
for beryllium appeared to be of slightly
smaller magnitude than that for H and D~\cite{Raychaudhuri}. A relative reduction of
the magnitude of the polarization by about
20$\%$ was observed
for copper and lead targets compared to beryllium.
Furthermore, $P_{\rm n}^{\Lambda}$
remained small in relativistic heavy-ion collisions up to $p_T \approx 2.5$~GeV. At higher
transverse momenta, $P_{\rm n}^{\Lambda}$ measured in such experiments was found to be similar
to that observed in p-p or p-nucleus scattering~\cite{Bellwied}.
For proton and neutron beams, the measured polarization is negative,
i.e., the polarization vector $\vec{P}_{\rm n}^{~\Lambda}$ and the normal
$\widehat{n} = {\vec{k} \times \vec{p} }/{|\vec{k} \times \vec{p}|}$ to the production plane have opposite directions,
while for $K^-$~\cite{ganguli,gourlay,haupt} and
$\Sigma^-$~\cite{wa89,selex} beams the polarization is positive in the forward direction ($x_F>0$) and for $\pi^-$ beams~\cite{stuntebeck,sughara,bensinger} it is positive in the backward hemisphere ($x_F<0$). In contrast, the polarization is compatible with zero for $\pi^+$ and $K^+$ beams.

While the transverse  polarization of hyperons was studied in detail with hadron beams, very
little experimental information about $P_{\rm n}^{\Lambda}$ is available from photo- or
electroproduction.
The $x_F$ dependence observed in early measurements~\cite{Aston,Abe}
was very similar to the one seen in $\pi^-$-p reactions, but the data
were of low statistical accuracy.
More recently, the {\sc Hermes}\ experiment has obtained for the
first time statistically significant experimental results on the transverse $\Lambda$
polarization in inclusive quasireal photoproduction~\cite{Airapetian}. The measured
polarization is positive in both the forward and the backward directions.

The analysis presented in Ref.~\cite{Airapetian} combined the data collected by the {\sc Hermes}\
experiment in the years 1996--2000 using mostly hydrogen and deuterium targets. More data were
collected in the years 2002--2005 with the target nuclei
H, D, $^4$He, Ne, Kr, and Xe,
which allowed for the study of the dependence of
$P_{\rm n}^{\Lambda}$ on the atomic-mass number $A$ of the target nuclei. The results of all
these measurements are presented here.

\section{Experiment}

The data were accumulated by the {\sc Hermes}\ experiment at the {\sc Hera}\ accelerator facility of
{\sc Desy}. The 27.6~GeV lepton (electron or positron) beam passed through a
40~cm long open-ended tubular
storage cell internal to the  lepton storage ring.
The storage cell was filled with polarized or unpolarized target gas of the various elements.
Part of the data was collected using a transversely or longitudinally
polarized hydrogen target and a longitudinally polarized deuterium target, respectively. The
direction of the target
polarization was reversed  in 1--3~min intervals, resulting in a vanishing average
target polarization of the data set.

The {\sc Hermes}\ detector is described in detail in Ref.~\cite{Ackerstaff}. It was a forward
magnetic spectrometer with a geometric acceptance confined to two regions in scattering angle,
arranged symmetrically above (top) and below (bottom) the
beam pipe and covering ranges of $\pm$(40--140)~mrad in the vertical and $\pm$170~mrad in the
horizontal component of the scattering angle with respect to the center of the target cell.

The criteria for data selection and the analysis procedure are similar to those described in
detail in Ref.~\cite{Airapetian}.
The scattered lepton was not required to be detected. In this case the data sample is dominated
by the kinematic regime  of quasireal photoproduction with
$Q^2 \approx 0$~GeV$^2$, (where $-Q^2$ represents the squared four-momentum of the virtual
photon exchanged in the electromagnetic interaction).
The kinematic distribution of the quasireal photons  was obtained from a Monte Carlo simulation of the process using the
{\sc Pythia}\ event generator~\cite{PYTHIA}
and a {\sc Geant}\ \cite{GEANT} model of the detector.
The energy distribution obtained from this simulation is nearly flat in the region $\nu \approx$ 6--26~GeV with a broad maximum near 13~GeV.
Below and above this region it drops rapidly to zero, resulting in an average photon energy of
$\langle \nu \rangle \approx 16$~GeV.

The $\Lambda$ events were detected through their $\Lambda \to \text{p}\pi ^{-}$ decay channel, by
requiring the presence of at least two hadron candidates of opposite charges.
In the event selection the fact was used that in the laboratory system  the momentum of the
decay proton is always larger than the pion momentum for  $\Lambda$ momenta above  $\sim 300$~MeV.
The information from a
dual-radiator ring-imaging Cherenkov counter was used to assure that the positive hadron was not a pion.
When more than one positive or negative hadron was found in an event, all possible combinations
of oppositely charged hadron pairs were considered.
All tracks were also required to satisfy a series of fiducial-volume cuts designed to avoid the
inactive edges of the detector. Furthermore, both hadron tracks were required to be
reconstructed in the same spectrometer half to avoid effects caused by  possible misalignment of the
two spectrometer halves relative to each other. This requirement reduced the number of
$\Lambda$-event candidates by $\sim 15\%$.

\begin{figure}
\epsfig{width=0.9\columnwidth, file=figure01}
\caption{Invariant-mass distributions for $\Lambda$ events obtained with hydrogen and deuterium
targets (top panel) and with krypton and xenon targets (bottom panel). The vertical
lines indicate the invariant-mass interval used for the determination of
the $\Lambda$ polarization. The quantities given in the legends are the number of analyzed $\Lambda$ events, ${N^\Lambda}$, in the selected
invariant-mass window after subtraction of background events, the reconstructed $\Lambda$ mass ${\rm M}^{\Lambda}$, the resolution $\sigma$ of the invariant-mass
distribution, and the fraction $\eta$  of
$\Lambda$ events in this mass window.
}
\label{fig:mass}
\end{figure}

Track reconstruction was performed with a track-fitting algorithm based on the Kalman filter with
substantially improved vertex determination and momentum resolution compared to the one used for the data
published previously. This algorithm allows for the
best-possible estimates on track parameters at the beam crossing and/or at
the (possible) vertices with other tracks of a given event.
Two spatial vertices were reconstructed for each event: the $\Lambda$-decay vertex from the
intersection of the proton and pion tracks and the $\Lambda$-production vertex from the
intersection of the reconstructed  $\Lambda$ track with the nominal beam axis.
The $\Lambda$-production vertex was required to be downstream of the upstream end of the
target cell and the decay vertex was required to be at least 40 cm downstream of the center of the
target cell. The latter requirement was chosen as a compromise between statistical precision and low background of the data
sample and the need to avoid---for data taken with a polarized target---any residual influence of the
target's magnetic field on the polarization measurement.

For tracks fulfilling all the above given requirements the invariant mass of the hadron pair was evaluated.
The resulting invariant-mass distributions for the combined hydrogen and deuterium (H+D) and
the combined krypton and xenon (Kr+Xe) data are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:mass}. These
distributions are very similar for all nuclei. They were fitted by a Gaussian plus a second-order polynomial line shape.
Compared to the data published previously~\cite{Airapetian}, the resolution $\sigma$ of the
mass reconstruction was improved from 2.23 MeV to 1.80 MeV. The position
of the $\Lambda$ peak agrees within $\sim0.10$ MeV
with the world average of (1115.683 $\pm$ 0.006) MeV~\cite{PDG}. Events within an
invariant-mass window
of ${\pm 3.3 \sigma}$ around the mean value of the Gaussian fit were selected, and background
events, $N^{\rm bgr}$, were subtracted with the procedure
described in Ref.~\cite{Airapetian}. The background is small, the fraction
$\eta = N^{\Lambda}/(N^{\Lambda} + N^{\rm bgr})$ of $\Lambda$ events in the selected mass
window being $\sim 96\%$ for all targets.

\section{Extraction of ${\Lambda}$~polarization}

{
\begin{figure}
\epsfig{width=0.8\columnwidth, file=figure02}
\caption{Sketch of $\Lambda$ production and decay. The polarization vector
$\vec{P}_{\rm n}^{\Lambda}$ is directed along
the normal $\widehat{n}$ to the $\Lambda$ production plane; $\theta$ is the angle between the momentum of the decay proton  and
$\widehat{n}$ in the rest frame of the $\Lambda$ hyperon.
}
\label{fig:diag}
\end{figure}
}

The topology of $\Lambda$ production and decay is sketched in Fig.~\ref{fig:diag} where the
decay into a proton and a pion is shown in the $\Lambda$ rest frame. The method of extraction of the transverse $\Lambda$ polarization is described in detail in
Ref.~\cite{Airapetian}. For the parity-violating $\Lambda \to \text{p}\pi ^{-}$ decay, the angular
distribution of the decay protons in the $\Lambda$ rest frame is given by
\begin{equation}
\frac{dN}{d\Omega}=\frac{dN_0}{d\Omega}(1+\alpha P_{\rm n}^\Lambda\cos\theta),
\label{eq:eq2}
\end{equation}

\noindent where $\frac{dN_{0} }{d\Omega  }$ is the decay distribution for unpolarized $\Lambda$
hyperons, $\theta $ is the angle between the proton momentum and the normal $\widehat{n}$,
and $\alpha=0.642 \pm 0.013$~\cite{PDG}.
The decay
protons are preferentially emitted along the spin direction of the $\Lambda$ in its
rest frame. This provides
the possibility of obtaining the $\Lambda$ polarization by measuring the asymmetry in the proton's
angular distribution.

For a detector with $4\pi$ acceptance, the polarization is given by
$P_{\rm n}^\Lambda=\frac{3}{\alpha}\left\langle\cos\theta\right\rangle$, where
$\left\langle\cos\theta\right\rangle\equiv\frac{1}{N^{\Lambda}}
\sum_{i=1}^{N^{\Lambda} }(\cos \theta)_i$ is the first moment of the angular distribution and
$N^{\Lambda}$ is the number of $\Lambda$ events analyzed.
For a detector with nonuniform acceptance, the linear $\cos\theta$ distribution in Eq.~\ref
{eq:eq2} can be strongly distorted. For the determination of $P_{\rm n}^{\Lambda}$ the mean
value of $\cos\theta$ for the \textit{unpolarized }distribution,
$\left\langle\cos\theta\right\rangle_0$, must be known with
good precision.
For a detector with ideal top/bottom mirror symmetry,
there is an important
simplification: the first moment for unpolarized $\Lambda$ events vanishes ($\left\langle \cos
\theta  \right\rangle_0 =0$), and
$\left\langle \cos^m\theta  \right\rangle_0 = \left\langle \cos^m\theta  \right\rangle$
($ m = 2, 4, ...$), i.e.,
 all even ``polarized'' moments are equal to the ``unpolarized'' ones. This allows for
the determination of $P_{\rm n}^{\Lambda}$
using only the experimentally measured values
for $(\cos \theta )_i$ without the need for a  Monte Carlo simulation of the spectrometer
acceptance:
\begin{equation}
P_{\rm n}^\Lambda =\frac{\left\langle \cos \theta  \right\rangle}
{\alpha \left\langle \cos ^{2} \theta  \right\rangle} .
\label{eq:eq3}
\end{equation}

The numerator in Eq.~\ref{eq:eq3} represents the measured asymmetry in the angular distribution
while the denominator stands for the analyzing power in the case of nonuniform acceptance.
For the {\sc Hermes}\ spectrometer, the top/bottom mirror symmetry is not absolutely perfect and
Eq.~\ref{eq:eq3} is only a good approximation. The true values for
$\left\langle\cos\theta\right\rangle_0$ and $P_{\rm n}^{\Lambda}$  therefore have to be
determined in an iterative procedure that
takes into account the measured differences between $\langle\cos\theta\rangle$ for the top and
bottom halves of the detector~\cite{Airapetian}.

\section{Results}

\begin{table}[t]
\caption{Average transverse ${\Lambda}$ polarization $P_{\rm n}^{\Lambda}$ for various target
nuclei together with the statistical uncertainties $\delta{P_{\rm n}^{\Lambda}}({\rm stat})$
of the measurements, the number of analyzed $\Lambda$ events, ${N^\Lambda}$, in the selected
invariant-mass window after subtraction of background events, and the fraction $\eta$  of
$\Lambda$ events in this mass window. Also presented are the differences
$\Delta{\rm M}^{\Lambda}$ between the reconstructed $\Lambda$ mass and the world
average~\cite{PDG},
the resolution $\sigma$ of the invariant-mass
distribution, and the average values of  the transverse $\Lambda$ momentum
$\left\langle p_T \right\rangle $ and the
variable $\left\langle \zeta \right\rangle $, which is an approximate measure of whether the
$\Lambda$ is produced in the forward or in the backward region (see text). The systematic uncertainty is 0.02 for all targets.}
\label{tab:results}
\vspace{3mm}
\begin{tabular}{lrrrrrr}
\hline\hline\\[-2mm]
 & ~~H~~~ & ~~D~~~  & ~~$^4$He~~ & ~~Ne~~~ & ~~~Kr~~~ & ~~Xe~~~ \\
\hline\\[-2mm]
$P_{\rm n}^{\Lambda}$ & 0.062& 0.052& 0.051 & 0.092& -0.005& 0.010\\[1mm]
$\delta{P_{\rm n}^{\Lambda}}({\rm stat})$ & 0.008&0.006 & 0.044& 0.026& 0.017& 0.023\\[1mm]
${N^\Lambda}/10^3$ &108.5 &185.9 & 3.4 & 10.2 & 24.2& 13.7\\[1mm]
$\eta$ &0.96 &0.96 & 0.96&0.96 &0.96 & 0.97\\[1mm]
$\Delta{\rm M}^{\Lambda}$ [MeV] &0.02 &0.05 & 0.09&0.11 & 0.04& 0.00\\[1mm]
$\sigma$ [MeV] & 1.79&1.82 & 1.96& 1.89&1.77 & 1.79\\[1mm]
$\left\langle p_T \right\rangle $ [GeV]~~~ &0.63 & 0.63& 0.67&0.68 &0.64 & 0.64\\[1mm]
$\left\langle \zeta \right\rangle $  & 0.25& 0.25& 0.27& 0.27&0.25 &0.25 \\[1mm]
\hline\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{table}

The experimental results for the extracted transverse polarization $P_{\rm n}^{\Lambda}$,
averaged over
all kinematic variables, are presented in Table~\ref{tab:results} for the various target nuclei,
together with the statistical
uncertainties of the measurements,
the number of $\Lambda$ events in the selected
invariant-mass window after subtraction of background events, and
the fraction $\eta$  of $\Lambda$ events in this mass
window.  Also presented are the differences $\Delta{\rm M}^{\Lambda}$ between the reconstructed
$\Lambda$ mass and the world average~\cite{PDG},
the resolution $\sigma$ of the invariant-mass distribution, the
average values of the transverse $\Lambda$ momentum, $p_T$, and of the variable
$\zeta =(E^{\Lambda}+p_L)/({E+k}) \approx E^{\Lambda} /E $. Here $E^{\Lambda}$ and $E$ are the
energies of the $\Lambda$ produced and the beam lepton, respectively, and $p_L$ is the
$\Lambda$'s momentum component in the beam direction measured in the target rest frame.
As discussed in Ref.~\cite{Airapetian}, the variable $\zeta$
provides an approximate measure of whether
the $\Lambda$ hyperon was produced in the forward region $(\zeta >0.3)$ in the center-of-mass frame of the $\gamma^*$-nucleon reaction,
whereas for $\zeta<0.2$ it is predominantly produced
in the backward region but still with a significant admixture of forward-going $\Lambda$
hyperons.
The values of $\Delta{\rm M}^{\Lambda}$, $\sigma$, $\left\langle p_T \right\rangle $, and $\left\langle \zeta \right\rangle $
are very similar for all targets.

The systematic uncertainty of $P_{\rm n}^{\Lambda}$ has been estimated to be $\pm 0.02$. This
value was
derived from detailed Monte Carlo studies that took into account possible detector
misalignments,
and also from the false polarization measured for
$K^0_s \rightarrow \pi^+ \pi^-$ events that provide an event topology with two separated vertices
similar to ${\Lambda}$ decays. Some data were taken with a transversely polarized hydrogen target. The effects of the
transversely oriented magnetic holding field in the target region were taken into account in the
reconstruction of the charged-particle tracks. The integrated transverse target field was
$\sim 0.17$~Tm. This caused an average precession of the $\Lambda$'s magnetic moment of less than
one degree, with negligible impact on the extracted transverse polarization.

The results for the measured transverse polarizations are presented in Fig.~\ref{fig:adep} as a
function of the atomic-mass number $A$ of the various target nuclei. The results for the light
nuclei are significantly positive; those for hydrogen and deuterium agree within their
statistical uncertainties. The average value for H+D is
$\left\langle P_{\rm n}^{\Lambda}({\rm H+D})\right\rangle = 0.056 \pm 0.005\text{(stat)} \pm 0.020\text{(sys)}$
with the average value for all nuclei being $\left\langle P_{\rm n}^{\Lambda}(\text{all }A)\right\rangle = 0.044 \pm 0.011$.

The transverse polarization for neon is above this value by more than one standard deviation,
while  the results  for krypton and xenon are
compatible with zero within the statistical uncertainties of the data. The average value of
$P_{\rm n}^{\Lambda}$ for the combined krypton and xenon data is
$\left\langle P_{\rm n}^{\Lambda}({\rm Kr+Xe})\right\rangle = 0.000 \pm 0.014\text{(stat)} \pm  0.020\text{(sys)}$.

\begin{figure}[t]
\begin{center}
\epsfig{width=0.90\columnwidth, file=figure03}
\end{center}
\caption{Dependence of the transverse polarization $P_{\rm n}^{\Lambda}$
on the atomic-mass number $A$ of the target nuclei. The inner error bars represent the
statistical uncertainties; the full error bars represent the total uncertainties, evaluated as
the sum in quadrature of statistical and systematic uncertainties.
}
\label{fig:adep}
\end{figure}

Despite the rather large value for
neon there is an indication of a decrease of $P_{\rm n}^{\Lambda}$ with the atomic-mass number
$A$ of the target nuclei. However, the statistical accuracy of the measurements does not allow for
a precise determination of the functional form of this $A$ dependence.

The $\Lambda$ polarizations for the combined H+D and the combined Kr+Xe data are shown as a
function of $\zeta$ in Fig.~\ref{fig:zetadep}.
The H+D data (closed symbols) decrease continuously from a value of $\sim 0.08$ at low $\zeta$
to $\sim 0.02$ at $\zeta \simeq 0.45$, while the Kr+Xe data (open symbols) fluctuate around
zero. For each point in $\zeta$
the average value of $p_T$ is different, as it is shown in the lower panel of the figure.

\begin{figure}[t]
\begin{center}
\epsfig{width=0.75\columnwidth, file=figure04}
\end{center}
\caption{Dependence of the transverse polarization $P_{\rm n}^{\Lambda}$
for the combined hydrogen and deuterium data (closed symbols) and the combined krypton and
xenon data (open symbols) on the variable $\zeta$. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties only; the systematic uncertainties
are not shown, since they are strongly correlated for the kinematic dependences. The values of $\left\langle p_T
\right\rangle$ for each $\zeta$ bin are shown in the lower panel.
}
\label{fig:zetadep}
\end{figure}

\begin{figure}[bt]
\begin{center}
\epsfig{width=0.83\columnwidth, file=figure05}
\end{center}
\caption{Dependence of the transverse polarization $P_{\rm n}^{\Lambda}$ on the transverse $\Lambda$ momentum $p_T$. Closed circles (squares) represent the combined hydrogen and deuterium data for the region $\zeta < 0.2$ ($\zeta > 0.3$).
The combined krypton and xenon data (open triangles) are shown for the full $\zeta$ range.
 The error bars represent the statistical
uncertainty.
The values of $\left\langle \zeta \right\rangle$ for each $p_T$ bin are shown in the lower
panel.
}
\label{fig:ptdep}
\end{figure}

In Fig.~\ref{fig:ptdep} the polarizations are shown  as a function of $p_T$. The H+D data
are presented for two intervals in the variable $\zeta$. The $p_T$ dependence in these two
intervals is rather different. In the region $\zeta < 0.2$, where the produced $\Lambda$
hyperons mainly stem from the
backward region, the polarization increases linearly with $p_T$ up to a value
of $\sim 0.12$ at $p_T \simeq 0.75$ GeV (closed circles), while in the region
$\zeta > 0.3$ (closed squares) the polarization is substantially smaller with very
little dependence on $p_T$. The statistical uncertainties of the Kr+Xe data prevent a firm conclusion about the $p_T$ dependences in the two $\zeta$ regions. The polarization is compatible with zero over
the whole $p_T$ range although the average polarization in the region $\zeta < 0.2$ is $0.059 \pm 0.024 ({\rm stat})$, while it is $-0.012 \pm 0.027 ({\rm stat})$ in the region $\zeta > 0.3$.
It should be noted that the measured ratio of $\Lambda$ yields for (Kr+Xe) and D decreases with $\zeta$ and increases at large $p_T$. This behavior is rather similar to the ratio of hadron multiplicities for heavy nuclear targets and deuterium as a function of $z$ and $p_t$ in semi-inclusive deep-inelastic scattering~\cite{airapetian07,airapetian11}, where
$z = E_h/\nu$ is the fractional hadron energy and $p_t$ is the transverse hadron momentum with respect to the virtual-photon direction.

\section{Discussion}
The transverse $\Lambda$ polarization $P_{\rm n}^{\Lambda}$ was measured in inclusive quasireal
photoproduction on nuclei. The observed polarization is positive, the same as those
observed for
$K^-$ and $\Sigma^-$ beams in the forward direction and for $\pi^-$ beams in the backward direction.
The polarizations obtained for
hydrogen and deuterium targets, and consequently for free protons and neutrons, agree within their statistical accuracies.
For the combined hydrogen and deuterium data the measured polarization decreases with the
variable $\zeta$ that provides an approximate measure of whether
the $\Lambda$ hyperon was produced in the forward or in the backward region in the
center-of-mass frame of the $\gamma^*$-nucleon reaction. For small $\zeta$ ($\zeta < 0.2$), the
polarization increases linearly with $p_T$, whereas in the forward region ($\zeta > 0.3$) the
polarization is substantially smaller with very
little dependence on $p_T$. This behavior points to a different production mechanism
in the two kinematic regions. The interpretation of these
observations depends on the mechanism assumed for generating the $\Lambda$ polarization,
which at present is not understood.
There is an indication of a decrease of $P_{\rm n}^{\Lambda}$ with the atomic-mass number $A$
of the target nuclei. In contrast to measurements in hadron-nucleus scattering---where the
magnitude of the polarization for heavier nuclei appears to be somewhat smaller than for light nuclei but still
substantially different from zero---the polarization for the combined Kr+Xe data from the
present measurement, integrated over $p_T$ and $\zeta$,
is compatible with zero within the statistical uncertainties and about four standard deviations below the combined H+D result.
At low $\zeta$ and $p_T$, i.e., in the backward hemisphere, the Kr+Xe results seem to agree within their
statistical uncertainties with the H+D results, such that the overall reduction possibly stems mainly from the forward direction.

The situation is further complicated by the fact that
a fraction of the detected $\Lambda$ particles and their polarization originates from decays of
heavier hyperons like $\Sigma^0$, $\Sigma(1385)$, and $\Xi$.  So far, the transverse
polarization of these hyperons in quasireal photoproduction is unknown as is its
dependence on the nuclear target mass.

It is difficult to formulate theoretical implications of these results in
general terms, i.e., without recurring to specific models.
For hard processes intuitive physical pictures were
proposed in the literature to explain qualitatively the origin of single-spin asymmetries
(SSAs) and especially of transverse hyperon polarization;
see, e.g., Refs. \cite{Abramov,Burkardt,Hannafious:2008dx}.
The usual factorization of QCD processes into products of distribution functions,
hard amplitudes, and fragmentation functions \cite{Mulders} requires a large momentum in
the hard amplitude. This requirement is not fulfilled for quasireal photoproduction and at the relatively
small transverse momenta of the present experiment, as opposed to deep-inelastic lepton-nucleon scattering.
Still, a smooth dependence on the
virtuality $Q$ of the photon would be expected such that a comparison of results from
single-spin asymmetries in leptoproduction
and in p-p and p-A collisions as well as corresponding theoretical calculations~\cite{Koike:2002ar}
is interesting, especially because even the sign of
theoretical expectations is still under debate; see Ref.~\cite{Kang}.
Recently, the theoretical situation seems to have been clarified by Ref.~\cite{Kanazawa},
which stressed that $p_T$-dependent fragmentation plays an important
role. If so, one might also expect sizable asymmetries in soft $p_T$-dependent fragmentation.

\section{Acknowledgments}

We gratefully acknowledge the {\sc DESY} management for its support and the staff
at {\sc DESY} and the collaborating institutions for their significant effort.
This work was supported by
the Ministry of Education and Science of Armenia;
the FWO-Flanders and IWT, Belgium;
the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada;
the National Natural Science Foundation of China;
the Alexander von Humboldt Stiftung,
the German Bundesministerium f\"ur Bildung und Forschung (BMBF), and
the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG);
the Italian Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN);
the MEXT, JSPS, and G-COE of Japan;
the Dutch Foundation for Fundamenteel Onderzoek der Materie (FOM);
the Russian Academy of Science and the Russian Federal Agency for
Science and Innovations;
the Basque Foundation for Science (IKERBASQUE) and the UPV/EHU under program UFI 11/55;
the U.K.~Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council,
the Science and Technology Facilities Council,
and the Scottish Universities Physics Alliance;
as well as the U.S.~Department of Energy (DOE) and the National Science Foundation (NSF).

High Energy Physics - Experiment (hep-ex); Nuclear Experiment (nucl-ex)