Flux emergence and generation of flare-productive active regions

Abstract: Solar flares and coronal mass ejections are among the most prominent manifestations of the magnetic activity of the Sun. The strongest events of them tend to occur in active regions (ARs) that are large, complex, and dynamically evolving. However, it is not clear what the key observational features of such ARs are, and how these features are produced. This article answers these fundamental questions based on morphological and magnetic characteristics of flare-productive ARs and their evolutionary processes, i.e., large-scale flux emergence and subsequent AR formation, which have been revealed in observational and theoretical studies. We also present the latest modeling of flare-productive ARs achieved using the most realistic flux emergence simulations in a very deep computational domain. Finally, this review discusses the future perspective pertaining to relationships of flaring solar ARs with the global-scale dynamo and stellar superflares.

\section{Introduction}\label{sec:intro}

The Sun ceaselessly exhibits activity events of various scales over the whole spectrum of electromagnetic waves. Solar flares and coronal mass ejections (CMEs) are among the most prominent energy-releasing phenomena in the current solar system \citep{2011SSRv..159...19F,2011LRSP....8....6S}. Most powerful events often emanate from active regions (ARs) that harbor substantial magnetic non-potentiality.

ARs are created owing to the emergence of dynamo-generated toroidal magnetic flux from the subsurface layer (flux emergence; \citealt{1955ApJ...121..491P}). In the convection zone, where the gas pressure surpasses the magnetic pressure (i.e., plasma-$\beta$ is greater than unity), magnetic flux is buffeted by convective turbulence and accumulates twist during its ascent. However, as the flux reaches the photosphere and moves further into the atmosphere, where the plasma density drastically decreases and the magnetic field is dominant ($\beta<1$), the flux begins to build up ARs. Owing to the drastic reduction of the external gas pressure, the flux expands into the atmosphere, and the accumulated twist can be released. If an AR has a sufficient amount of magnetic flux, sunspots are gradually produced, and flares and CMEs may occasionally occur if the free magnetic energy ($\Delta E_{\rm mag}$) stored in the corona is suddenly released, where
\begin{eqnarray}
  \Delta E_{\rm mag}=\int\frac{B^{2}}{8\pi}\,dV - \int\frac{B_{\rm pot}^{2}}{8\pi}\,dV
\end{eqnarray}
and $\mbox{\boldmath $B$}$ and $\mbox{\boldmath $B$}_{\rm pot}$ denote the actual and potential magnetic fields, respectively.

Fig. \ref{fig:11158} presents the observation of an M-class flare (occurred in February 2011) in NOAA AR 11158. The chromospheric image (top panel) displays two bright patches, known as flare ribbons, that extend at both sides of the polarity inversion line (PIL), where the magnetic polarity ($B_{z}$, or the Stokes-I/V signal in the middle panel) alters its sign.

In the flare theories such as the CSHKP model \citep[after][]{1964NASSP..50..451C,1966Natur.211..695S,1974SoPh...34..323H,1976SoPh...50...85K} and its variations, the flare ribbons brighten in response to the injection of energy that precipitates along the loops, sourcing from the site of magnetic reconnection in the corona. The heated chromospheric plasma {\it evaporates} and fills the coronal loops, which leads to the stark enhancement of the soft X-ray flux, as shown in the bottom panel of Fig. \ref{fig:11158}. The loops gradually cool down with time through radiation and thermal conduction, and eventually, the X-ray light curve returns to the background level.

\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{flare.eps}
\caption{M6.6-class flare in NOAA AR 11158 as observed by Hinode/SOT \citep{2007SoPh..243....3K,2008SoPh..249..167T} with the GOES soft X-ray light curve. The detailed analysis suggests that the hook-shaped magnetic field on the PIL triggered the event \citep{2012ApJ...760...31K,2013ApJ...778...48B}. Figure reproduced from \citet{2013ApJ...773..128T} by permission of the AAS.}
\label{fig:11158}
\end{figure}

As a result of reconnection, a helical flux rope is ejected upward, probably with the support of plasma instabilities, and, if successful, it develops into a CME that travels through the interplanetary space. The flare event in Fig. \ref{fig:11158} was reportedly accompanied by the CME eruption \citep[e.g.,][]{2012ApJ...745L...4L,2018NatCo...9..174I}.

The overall description above, i.e., from the dynamo, flux emergence, AR formation, to the subsequent occurrence of flares and CMEs, is accepted in the research community. However, in this article, we address the following two key questions:
\begin{itemize}
\item What are the important observational features of the flare-productive ARs?
\item If there exist any, how are these features created?
\end{itemize}
As the genesis of flaring ARs is related to the prediction and forecasting of flare eruptions, it is recognized as one of the primary targets in solar physics to be explored in the next decade \citep[see, e.g.,][]{2015AdSpR..55.2745S}.

In the rest of this article, we focus on the flux emergence and formation of ARs that are prone to major solar flares, and thus, for the understanding of flares and CMEs, readers are advised to refer to other excellent reviews \citep[e.g.,][and references therein]{2002A&ARv..10..313P,2011LRSP....8....1C,2011SSRv..159...19F,2011LRSP....8....6S,2015SoPh..290.3425J,2017LRSP...14....2B}.

Section \ref{sec:obs} provides an overview of flare-productive ARs by reviewing the observational features of the ARs. Section \ref{sec:sim} presents theoretical studies to numerically reproduce the formation processes of flaring ARs. Section \ref{sec:r2d2} introduces the latest modeling attempts of flaring ARs with the most realistic setup. Section \ref{sec:summary} summarizes the paper and discusses some remaining problems.

\section{Observational aspects}\label{sec:obs}

This section deals with the observational aspects of flare-productive ARs. Since the discovery of solar flares \citep{1859MNRAS..20...13C,1859MNRAS..20...15H}, significant effort has been made to scrutinize the mechanism and origin of eruptions. Considering that strong flares mostly occur in ARs, we can directly examine the relationship between the flares and morphological and magnetic characteristics of their hosting sunspots, which we elaborate in the following subsections.

\subsection{$\delta$-sunspots and flare activity}\label{sec:obs:delta}

Observers have noticed that the structure of sunspots is one of the key factors that determine the flare activity. For instance, in the following Mt. Wilson sunspot classification, $\delta$-spots are known to be very flare-active \citep{1960AN....285..271K}:
\begin{itemize}
\item $\alpha$, a unipolar spot group
\item $\beta$, a single bipolar spot group of both positive and negative polarities
\item $\gamma$, a complex spot group in which spots of both polarities are distributed so irregularly as to prevent classification as a $\beta$ group
\item $\delta$, a spot group in which umbrae of opposite polarities are separated by less than 2$^{\circ}$ and situated within the common penumbra
\end{itemize}
\citet{2000ApJ...540..583S} showed that the flare magnitude increases with the size and complexity of the spot groups. According to these authors, all $\ge$X4-class flares occur in spot groups of areas greater than 1000 MSH and classified as the most complex $\beta\gamma\delta$.

Major spaceweather events in history were mostly caused by $\delta$-spots. For instance, the great geomagnetic storm in March 1989, which caused a severe power outage in Quebec, Canada, and damaged devices at power plants in New Jersey, USA, is related to NOAA AR 5395 and its series of strong flares \citep[e.g.,][]{1989EOSTr..70.1479A}. The images and magnetograms of this AR, as shown in \citet{1991ApJ...380..282W}, reveal the existence of large complex-shaped $\delta$-spots.

\citet{1987SoPh..113..267Z} categorized the formation of $\delta$-spots into three types:
\begin{itemize}
\item Type 1: spots emerging all at once, intertwined
\item Type 2: satellite spots near larger older spots
\item Type 3: collision of two bipoles
\end{itemize}
The representative spot group of Type 1 is NOAA 5395 (March 1989), but other events, such as NOAA 5629 (August 1989), 5747 (October 1989), and 6659 (June 1991), have been extensively analyzed \citep{1993SoPh..143..107T,1994SoPh..150..199S}. A clear example of Type 2 is NOAA 10930 (December 2006). An X3.4-class flare occurred between sunspots of positive and negative polarities, but the positive spot was a part of a newly-emerging bipole, whose counterpart was quickly disappearing \citep{2007PASJ...59S.779K,2008ApJ...687..658W}: Observations of NOAA 10930 are summarized in Section 8 of \citet{2019PASJ...71R...1H}. NOAA 11158 (Fig. \ref{fig:11158}: February 2011) is the typical Type 3 $\delta$-spot. In this event, two bipoles emerged and underwent fly-by motion (near head-on collision). A series of strong flares occurred between the positive and negative spots, originated from different emerging bipoles, at the center \citep{2013ApJ...764L...3C,2014SoPh..289.3351T}.

\begin{figure*}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{toriumi2017a.eps}
\caption{Four representative categories of flaring ARs. From top to bottom, the polarity distribution, possible 3D structures of magnetic fields, and the sample events. In the magnetograms (bottom panels), temporally stacked flare ribbons are indicated by orange and turquoise contours. Figures reproduced from \citet{2017ApJ...834...56T} by permission of the AAS.}
\label{fig:spot}
\end{figure*}

Fig. \ref{fig:spot} displays four categories of flaring ARs \citep{2017ApJ...834...56T}. Surveying 51 $\ge$M5-class events that occurred within 45$^{\circ}$ from the disk center over six years, these authors classified ARs based on their evolutionary patterns: (1) spot-spot, a complex, compact $\delta$-spots, in which an elongated PIL extends across the entire AR (probably equivalent to Type 1 $\delta$-spot); (2) spot-satellite, where a new emerging flux collides with an existing spot (Type 2); and (3) quadrupolar, the collision of two bipoles (Type 3). It was found that 83\% of the analyzed ARs displayed $\delta$-structures. However, two flares (X1.2 and M5.1) occurred at the boundaries among separated independent ARs (inter-AR cases), indicating that X-class events do not require $\delta$-spots.

Therefore, it is possible to categorize the formation of flaring ARs based on the apparent motions of individual polarities. However, we cannot investigate the subsurface flux emergence from direct optical observations. This is why the series of flux emergence simulations have been conducted.

\subsection{Observational characteristics}

In flaring ARs, PILs show a strong horizontal field ($>$4000 G), strong $B_{z}$ gradient ($\sim$100 G Mm$^{-1}$), and strong magnetic shear (80$^{\circ}$--90$^{\circ}$ from the direction of the potential field) \citep{1958IzKry..20...22S,1984SoPh...91..115H,1996ApJ...456..861W,2007ApJ...655L.117S}. Recently, \citet{2018ApJ...852L..16O}, \citet{2018RNAAS...2....8W}, and \citet{2020ApJ...895..129C} detected superstrong magnetic fields of $\gtrsim$6000 G in the transverse fields of $\delta$-spots light bridges (i.e., PILs). These values are probably the strongest ever measured on the Sun, including the sunspot umbrae. These strong-field, strong-gradient, highly-sheared PILs can be direct manifestation of the non-potentiality of magnetic fields. Therefore, observational parameters that characterize flaring PILs have been extensively used to predict flares and CMEs \citep[e.g.,][]{2002ApJ...569.1016F,2003ApJ...595.1277L,2007ApJ...655L.117S,2020Sci...369..587K}.

Such flaring PILs are often produced in the course of spot rotations and counter-streaming flows at PILs \citep{1976SoPh...47..233H}. For instance, the flares in NOAA 10930 occurred along the PIL between the two spots, and \citet{2009SoPh..258..203M} reported a fast spot rotation with an angular speed of $\sim 8^{\circ}$ hr$^{-1}$ before the X-class event, which sheared the magnetic fields around the PIL and supplied free energy. \citet{2019ApJ...871...67C} pointed out that flaring PILs are created by the relative movement of the spots, especially when the shearing and flux cancellation develop owing to the spot collision (collisional shearing). These PILs sometimes exhibit the ``magnetic channel,'' an alternating pattern of elongated positive and negative polarities \citep{1993Natur.363..426Z,1993SoPh..144...37Z}.

The complexity of ARs are often quantified by the magnetic helicity, a measure of magnetic topology such as twists, kinks, and internal linkage \citep{1956RvMP...28..135E}. The helicity of the magnetic field $\mbox{\boldmath $B$}$ fully contained in volume $V$ is defined as
\begin{eqnarray}
  H=\int_{V} \mbox{\boldmath $A$}\cdot\mbox{\boldmath $B$}\, dV,
\end{eqnarray}
where $\mbox{\boldmath $A$}$ is the vector potential of $\mbox{\boldmath $B$}$, i.e., $\mbox{\boldmath $B$}=\nabla\times\mbox{\boldmath $A$}$. In practical situations in solar physics, the magnetic field lines cross the boundary (e.g., the photosphere); therefore, it is more convenient to use the relative helicity,
\begin{eqnarray}
  H_{\rm R}=\int_{V} (\mbox{\boldmath $A$}+\mbox{\boldmath $A$}_{0})\cdot(\mbox{\boldmath $B$}-\mbox{\boldmath $B$}_{0})\, dV,
\end{eqnarray}
where $\mbox{\boldmath $A$}_{0}$ and $\mbox{\boldmath $B$}_{0}$ are the reference values of $\mbox{\boldmath $A$}$ and $\mbox{\boldmath $B$}$, respectively \citep{1984JFM...147..133B,finn1985}. $H_{R}$ has the advantage of being gauge invariant, and, in many cases, the potential field $\mbox{\boldmath $B$}_{\rm pot}\,(=\nabla\times\mbox{\boldmath $A$}_{\rm pot})$ is chosen as the reference field. Numerous observations have claimed the relationship between helicity injection and flare occurrence \citep[see, e.g.,][and references therein]{2009AdSpR..43.1013D,2016SSRv..201..147V}.

The ``magnetic tongues,'' the two extended polarities on magnetograms at both sides of the PILs, especially when they have a yin-yang pattern, are assumed to be the vertical projection of the poloidal component of the twisted emerging magnetic flux \citep{2000ApJ...544..540L}. Therefore, the arrangement of the tongues and PILs represent the sign of helicity in ARs, and observations reveal that flaring ARs show such ying-yang tongues \citep[e.g.,][]{2014SoPh..289.2041M,2015SoPh..290..727P}.

In the atmosphere above the PIL, magnetic flux ropes (bundles of twisted field lines) are sometimes observed as ``sigmoids'' in soft X-rays \citep{1996ApJ...464L.199R,1999GeoRL..26..627C} and ``filaments'' in H$\alpha$ images \citep{2002SoPh..207..111P}. The observations indicate that the filament formation is in favor of the model proposed by \citet{1989ApJ...343..971V}, in which converging and shearing flows around the PIL cause cancellation and twisting of the field lines to eventually produce a flux rope (filaments/prominences) above the PIL.

Other characteristics, such as non-neutralized electric currents, structural complexity of photospheric magnetograms, non-thermal broadening of coronal emission lines, and helioseismic (subsurface) signatures, exist. Moreover, the triggering of flare eruptions are often associated with the rapid development of photospheric magnetic fields. For more comprehensive discussion, readers may refer to Section 3 of \citet{2019LRSP...16....3T}.

\section{Theoretical aspects}\label{sec:sim}

As ARs are created through flux emergence from below the solar surface, it is essential to trace the evolution of magnetic flux from the deeper convection zone into the atmosphere. To realize this, the magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulations of flux emergence have been performed \citep{2008JGRA..113.3S04A,2009LRSP....6....4F,2014LRSP...11....3C,2014SSRv..186..227S}. In typical flux emergence simulations, in the stratified atmospheric layers representing the solar convection zone, photosphere, chromosphere, and corona, a flux tube is initially embedded into the convection zone. The flux tube starts rising by, for instance, perturbing velocity fields inside the tube or partially reducing the density from the tube to trigger the buoyant emergence (Parker instability: \citealt{1979cmft.book.....P}). As it ascents to the atmosphere, the flux tube builds up bipolar spots in the photosphere and magnetic loops in the corona.

To explain the generation of flare-productive ARs, several scenarios have been suggested and tested by performing such flux emergence simulations. In this section, we review the past attempts to theoretically model the observed characteristics of flaring ARs.

\subsection{Idealized models}\label{sec:sim:ideal}

 Many of the flux emergence simulations conducted so far fall into the category of idealized models, where the subsurface layer is given as an adiabatically stratified, plane parallel atmosphere; i.e., the interior is not convectively unstable. This treatment sets aside the complex effect of turbulent convection and allows modelers to focus on the essential physical processes.

\begin{figure*}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{toriumi2017b.eps}
\caption{Four representative flux emergence models of flare-productive ARs. The green arrows in the second column point to the satellite spots, which originate from the parasitic flux tube. Figures reproduced from \citet{2017ApJ...850...39T} by permission of the AAS.}
\label{fig:model}
\end{figure*}

One of the representative scenarios of $\delta$-spot formation is the ``kinked tube'' model, in which a strongly twisted tube rises owing to the kink instability \citep{1991SoPh..136..133T}. Using the anelastic MHD code, \citet{1999ApJ...521..460F} calculated the emergence of a kink-unstable flux tube in the interior and discovered that the horizontal slice of the emerging flux tube displays a compact bipolar pair with sheared PIL. Although this morphology is reminiscent of $\delta$-spots, these simulations were limited to the convection zone due to the anelastic approximation. \citet{2015ApJ...813..112T} coped with this problem by solving fully compressible MHD equations and extending the computational box to the corona. Interestingly, their modeled spots present, in spite of the simple bipolar configuration, a quadrupolar structure comprising main bipolar spots with an elongated pair in between (left column of Fig. \ref{fig:model}). Owing to the release of the helicity, the main spots show strong rotational motions, which is one of the key characteristics of the flaring ARs. The complex morphology in the magnetogram suggests that the kinked tube model may explain Type 1 $\delta$-spots \citep[see also][]{2018ApJ...864...89K}.

The second group is the ``interacting tube'' model, in which multiple flux bundles interfere with each other to build a single, perhaps complex, AR \citep[e.g.,][]{2007A&A...470..709M}. As shown in Fig. \ref{fig:model}, second column from the left, a parasitic flux tube is placed right above the main tube along the orthogonal direction. Lifted by the main tube, the parasitic tube produces satellite spots in the proximity to the main spot (indicated by green arrows). Therefore, this scenario may be one of the mechanisms of Type 2 $\delta$-spots, in which newly emerging flux appears within the penumbra of the existing spot \citep[see also][]{2018ApJ...857...83J}.

In the ``multi-buoyant segment'' scenario, a single flux tube becomes buoyant at two segments along the tube, probably caused by the convective pinning at the middle, and produces a pair of emerging bipoles on the surface, i.e., a quadrupolar AR \citep{2014SoPh..289.3351T}. In this case, the two bipoles cause head-on collision in between, and as a result, strongly packed positive and negative polarities are created with a highly sheared PIL in the center of the quadrupolar AR (Fig. \ref{fig:model}, third column). The overall evolution resembles Type 3 $\delta$-spots \citep{2015ApJ...806...79F,2019A&A...630A.134S}.

These models succeeded in reproducing $\delta$-configurations, sheared PILs, flux ropes, and others, all of which are the essential ingredients of the flaring ARs. \citet{2017ApJ...850...39T} performed a systematic survey of the aforementioned models using similar numerical conditions with as little difference as possible (Fig. \ref{fig:model}). Key findings are summarized below.
\begin{itemize}
\item Highly sheared PILs are formed owing to the combined effects of advection, stretching, and compression of magnetic fields, exerted by the spot motion.
\item Flux ropes are created above the PIL. However, access to the outer atmosphere (interplanetary space) depends on the magnetic structure of the entire AR, and this may determine the CME productivity.
\item Free energy is accumulated in the corona in the form of current sheets. Magnetic parameters that predict solar flares with high accuracy \citep[e.g.,][]{2015ApJ...798..135B} reflect the free magnetic energy stored in the corona well.
\end{itemize}

\subsection{Realistic models}

Contrary to idealized models, flux emergence models that incorporate the effect of thermal convection enable us to understand complex realistic aspects of the evolution, in particular, the coupling of magnetic field and turbulence. For instance, \citet{2010ApJ...720..233C} modeled the emergence of a twisted flux tube from the {\it convective} convection zone and eventual formation of proto-sunspots. By kinematically inserting the flux tube from the bottom boundary, placed at 7.5 Mm below the photosphere, as a sequentially updated bottom boundary, the authors succeeded in reproducing spots with umbral dots, light bridges, and penumbral filaments, which are the manifestation of magnetoconvection \citep[see also][]{2014ApJ...785...90R}.

Using the updated version of the same code, which is now extended to the solar corona, \citet{2019NatAs...3..160C} mimicked the emergence of small satellite spots within the penumbra of the existing spot to reproduce X-class flares in NOAA 12017 (April 2014). Their numerical results explain the properties of solar flares, such as temporal evolution of X-ray light curve, chromospheric evaporation, and flare ribbon expansion.

The interplay between the global-scale convection and magnetic flux has been strenuously investigated by using the 3D spherical shell models. For example, \citet{2013ApJ...762...73N} simulated the self-consistent generation of $\Omega$-loops from a bundle of toroidal flux, whereas \citet{2013ApJ...762....4J} modeled the emergence of a magnetic flux tube that is placed at the depth of the convection zone. \citet{2018ApJ...857...83J} also investigated the interaction of multiple emerging flux tubes and pointed out the possibility that such interactions introduce complexity to ARs. Although these computations are limited to the convection zone due to the anelastic approximation and, thus, cannot simulate the emergence into the photosphere, they revealed the importance of the turbulent background convection and the mutual interaction of flux tubes.

\section{New twist}\label{sec:r2d2}

Flux emergence simulations have succeeded in explaining various aspects of the mechanisms behind the formation of flare-producing ARs. However, most simulations are idealized: many models lack the realistic convection zone, or the emergence is triggered by artificially imposed buoyancy. Even in convective flux emergence simulations, the bottom boundary is not deep enough, at most $-30$ Mm \citep{2017ApJ...846..149C}, and flux tubes are kinematically injected from the bottom boundary. However, in reality, ARs are formed as the outcome of interaction between magnetic flux and background turbulent convection. To elucidate the effect and importance of deep large cells on the flux emergence, there has been a demand for detailed calculations.

\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.48\textwidth]{r2d2.eps}
\caption{Volume rendering of entropy perturbation in the {\it R2D2} simulation that is normalized by the averaged entropy at each depth level. Figure courtesy of H. Hotta.}
\label{fig:r2d2}
\end{figure}

To overcome these issues, \citet{2019ApJ...886L..21T} leveraged the newly developed radiative MHD code {\it R2D2} \citep{2019SciA....5.2307H,2020MNRAS.494.2523H}. In brief, this code reproduces the realistic solar convection in a very deep domain by employing the reduced sound-speed technique \citep{2005ApJ...622.1320R,2012A&A...539A..30H} and allows for the exploration of magnetoconvective evolution in the whole solar convection zone. First, the 3D computation box that spanned from $-139.2$ Mm to $+700$ km in height with a horizontal width of $98.3\ {\rm Mm}\,\times 98.3\ {\rm Mm}$ was prepared, and the box was numerically resolved by a $1024\times 1024\times 256$ grid (see Fig. \ref{fig:r2d2}). Considering that the previous convective emergence models reached down to approximately $-30\ {\rm Mm}$ and that the solar convection zone is a strongly stratified medium, the simulation with the bottom boundary at $-140\ {\rm Mm}$ is a significant advancement: The gas pressure at $-140\ {\rm Mm}$ is eight orders of magnitude greater than that in the photosphere. The periodic boundary condition was applied to both horizontal directions.

After the development of thermal convection in the box, a twisted force-free flux tube was placed at the depth of $16.7\ {\rm Mm}$, given as the Lundquist field \citep{1951PhRv...83..307L},
\begin{eqnarray}
  B_{x}=B_{\rm tb}J_{0}(\alpha r), B_{\phi}=B_{\rm tb}J_{1}(\alpha r),
\end{eqnarray}
where $r$ is the radial distance from the tube axis, $B_{\rm tb}=10\ {\rm kG}$ the axial field strength, $J_{0}$ and $J_{1}$ the Bessel functions, $\alpha=a_{0}/R_{\rm tb}$, $a_{0}=2.404825$, and $R_{\rm tb}=7\ {\rm Mm}$ the tube's radius. Unlike previous models, the flux tube was neither endowed with an artificial buoyancy nor forcibly injected into the domain. The tube was simply advected by the turbulent background convection.

Note that using $16.7\ {\rm Mm}$ as the initial depth allows us to investigate the emergence from the critical layer, where the approximations assumed in the previous simulations become invalid (around $-20\ {\rm Mm}$ for the anelastic and thin flux tube approximations; \citealt{2009LRSP....6....4F}). The artificial influences caused by adding a flux tube into the domain at one time step where there was none at the previous step \citep[e.g.,][]{2008ApJ...687.1373C}, such as a lack of the perfect mechanical balance, can be circumvented using the flux injection method. However, these influences would be minor because vigorous turbulence drastically reforms the magnetic configuration (see the following paragraphs).

\begin{figure*}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{tile_final3_en.eps}
\caption{Generation of $\delta$-spots in the {\it R2D2} simulation. From left to right, normalized emergent intensity, magnetic field strength $B_{z}$ (magnetogram), and normalized field strength $|\mbox{\boldmath $B$}|/(4\pi \rho_{0})^{1/2}$ (thus in units of velocity) on the vertical cross-section at 32.0 hr (upper row) and 42.3 hr (lower row) after the flux tube is initially placed. A pair of bipoles (P1-N1 and P2-N2) collide to produce $\delta$-spots N1-P2 and N2-P1. Figure reproduced from \citet{2019ApJ...886L..21T} by permission of the AAS.}
\label{fig:evolution}
\end{figure*}

Fig. \ref{fig:evolution} shows the evolutions of intensity, surface magnetogram, and magnetic field in the vertical cross-section. First, a large convection upflow elevates the flux tube at the side edge of the box at $x=0$ and $98.3\ {\rm Mm}$ (because of the periodic boundary condition), and a bipolar pair P1-N1 appears in the photosphere. As time progresses, the secondary pair P2-N2 emerges in the middle of the domain owing to another upflowing region and, consequently, a quadrupolar AR is formed. The right column demonstrates that two strong downdrafts (approximately $x=30$ and $70\ {\rm Mm}$) drag down the flux tube to make a W-shaped configuration. On the surface, the two emerging bipoles approach each other as they expand, and eventually, two $\delta$-spots, N1-P2 and N2-P1, are formed. The visibility in the intensity map shows that in each spot, the umbrae of opposite polarities reside in a common penumbra, satisfying the definition of the $\delta$-spot (Section \ref{sec:obs:delta}).

The PIL between the two spots within each $\delta$-spot shows a narrow lane of elongated granular cells (light bridge), and the polarity pattern resembles the magnetic channel structure. The previous simulations revealed that the light bridges in regular spots comprise granules, which, especially in the case of narrow light bridges, resemble the penumbra with an elongated magnetic field \citep{2010ApJ...720..233C,2015ApJ...811..138T,2015ApJ...811..137T}. The $\delta$-spot light bridge reproduced here shares a similar magnetoconvective structure.

In the photosphere, all four spots show counter-clockwise rotations owing to the releasing of the twist of the tube, which was imposed as the initial condition. As a result, a sheared (or counter-streaming) flow is excited around the PIL between the two neighboring spots of each $\delta$-spot, and this velocity field arranges the transverse component of the magnetic field to make the PIL highly sheared. The field strength pertaining to the PIL area far exceeds the equipartition value, which is of the order of 1 kG. \citet{2020MNRAS.498.2925H} performed high-resolution calculations, where the grid spacing is up to four times finer, and discovered that a very strong horizontal field of $\gtrsim$6000 G is formed at the edge of the $\delta$-spot light bridge. The field strength matches the recent observations made by \citet{2018ApJ...852L..16O} and others.

\begin{figure*}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{pil4.eps}
\caption{Bird's eye view and top-down view of magnetic field lines above the $\delta$-spot N2-P1 in Fig. \ref{fig:evolution}. A helical flux rope structure is formed above the PIL. It should be noted that this flux rope is created as a result of magnetic reconnection between the field lines originating from the two independent but neighboring sunspots N2 and P1, rather than the direct emergence of the original flux tube. Figure reproduced from \citet{2019ApJ...886L..21T} by permission of the AAS.}
\label{fig:fluxrope}
\end{figure*}

Fig. \ref{fig:fluxrope} shows the field line structure above one of the $\delta$-spots in Fig. \ref{fig:evolution}. Driven by the counter-streaming flow in the photosphere, the overlying arcade field is sheared and forms a flux rope structure. The 6-kG horizontal field \citep{2020MNRAS.498.2925H} is created by the strong shear at the $\delta$-spot PIL, which is sustained owing to the downward magnetic force caused by the overlying arcade.

The above simulations demonstrate that the flux emergence in the deep-enough computational box self-consistently reproduces $\delta$-spots and other key features. The entire evolution of $\delta$-spots follows the multi-buoyant segment scenario, in which a single flux system in the interior rises at two locations to produce colliding bipoles. It should be emphasized that the $\delta$-spot formation is a result of coupling between the magnetic flux and turbulent background convection.

\section{Summary and discussion}\label{sec:summary}

In this article, we discussed important observational features of flare-productive ARs, including $\delta$-spots, sheared PILs, magnetic channels, rotating spots, and flux ropes. These structures are reproduced by numerical models that have been performed over the past decades. In particular, state-of-the-art realistic flux emergence simulations that contain large convective cells in deeper layers are now able to reproduce all these features in a self consistent manner, and we understand that the interaction between magnetic flux and turbulent convection introduces such complexity in the ARs (see Fig. \ref{fig:flowchart}).

\begin{figure*}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{flowchart.eps}
\caption{Selected key observational features (mainly photospheric) discussed in this article and their relationships as revealed by the series of observational and theoretical studies. The morphological and magnetic complexities of flare-productive ARs are derived ultimately from the close interplay between magnetic flux and turbulent convection, i.e., the magnetoconvective nature of dynamo mechanisms in the deep interior.}
\label{fig:flowchart}
\end{figure*}

Although most sophisticated models reveal the critical aspects of the formation of flare-productive ARs, there still remains a scale gap between the localized flux-emergence simulations and global-scale dynamo models. For instance, almost none of the initial flux tubes in the flaring AR models introduced in Sections \ref{sec:sim} and \ref{sec:r2d2} is given as a dynamo-generated toroidal flux, and it is not obvious if these initial conditions are truly natural. Therefore, the next step of the R2D2 calculation would be to test the realistic flux emergence from much deeper layers. Ultimately, it is necessary to simultaneously solve the dynamo action in the deep convection zone of a global scale and the development of ARs on the surface to gain comprehensive understanding of the entire history from the interior to the surface.

From the observational aspect, it has been pointed out that the flare reconnection is triggered by small-scale, perhaps subarcsec-sized, photospheric fields around the PIL \citep[][and references therein]{2017NatAs...1E..85W}. Therefore, to understand the origin and development of flare triggers, unprecedented high-resolution polarimetry as achieved by DKIST \citep{2020SoPh..295..172R} is demanded. Further, UV observations suggest that the charging of flare energy in the atmosphere may be quantified by the non-thermal broadening of coronal emission lines \citep{2009ApJ...691L..99H,2014PASJ...66S..17I}. Such spectroscopic signatures of energy accumulation over the course of AR development would be one of the optimal targets of the next-generation space UV observatories Solar-C (EUVST) \citep{2019SPIE11118E..07S} and MUSE \citep{2020ApJ...888....3D}. Nevertheless, these efforts would be facilitated more by the support of advanced modeling capabilities.

Recent progress in observing stellar flares indicates the occurrence of superflares on solar-type stars, which are 10--1000 times stronger than those on the Sun \citep[e.g.,][]{2012Natur.485..478M}, and this leads to the discussion on the possibility of superflares on the Sun \citep[e.g.,][]{2013A&A...549A..66A,2013PASJ...65...49S}. Then, how do such superflaring starspots occur? As described in Section \ref{sec:obs}, on the Sun, we know that large, complex, rapidly-evolving ARs tend to produce massive flares. Therefore, it is required to obtain the information of starspot evolution and its relation with stellar flares \citep{2019ApJ...871..187N}. Recently, \citet{2020ApJ...902...36T} focused on the Sun-as-a-star spectral irradiance variations of transiting sunspots and revealed that the multi-wavelength monitoring of the stars may help us understand the structures and evolutions of starspots. In future, probably by combining with the numerical models, we may have a more detailed approach on finding the cause of stellar flares.

\section*{Acknowledgments}

We are grateful to the Special Issue Guest Editors (B. Schmieder and C. H. Mandrini) and the anonymous referees for improving the quality of the manuscript.
This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers JP18H03723 (PI: Y. Katsukawa), JP20KK0072 (PI: S. Toriumi),  JP21H01124 (PI: T. Yokoyama), and JP21H04492 (PI: K. Kusano), and by the NINS program for cross-disciplinary study (grant Nos. 01321802 and 01311904) on Turbulence, Transport, and Heating Dynamics in Laboratory and Astrophysical Plasmas: ``SoLaBo-X.''

\bibliographystyle{model5-names}
\biboptions{authoryear}


Two Physically Distinct Populations of Low-Ionization Nuclear Emission-Line Regions

Abstract: The nature of Low-ionization Nuclear Emission-line Regions (LINERs) has been an open question for a long time. We study the properties of LINERs from several different aspects. The LINERs are found to consist of two different categories that can be clearly separated in the traditional BPT diagrams, especially in the [OI]/Ha vs. [OIII]/Hb diagram. LINERs with high [O]/Ha ratios (population I) differ from ones with low ratios (population II) in several properties. Broad emission lines are only identified in the spectra of population I LINERs. While only the population II LINERs show luminous infrared emission and occurrence of core-collapse supernovae in the host. Combining these results with the known distribution of stellar populations not only suggests that the two populations have different line excitation mechanisms, but also implies that they are at different evolutionary stages.

\section{INTRODUCTION}

LINERs (Low Ionization Nuclear Emission-line Region) are
frequently identified in the local universe:  different surveys show that
up to 1/3 of all galaxies show LINER-like spectra (see Ho 2008 for a recent
review). Comparing with Seyfert 2 galaxies and star-forming
galaxies, optical spectra of LINERs are dominated by the emission lines of
low-ionized species, such as [\ion{O}{1}]$\lambda6300$,
[\ion{O}{2}]$\lambda3727$, [\ion{S}{2}]$\lambda\lambda6716,6731$ and
[\ion{N}{2}]$\lambda6548,6583$ (e.g., Heckman 1980)

Emission-line ratios are frequently used to classify different emission-line
galaxies with distinct power sources. At present, the classification
of emission-line galaxies is commonly based on the empirical BPT diagrams
that were originally proposed by Baldwin et al. (1981), and then refined by
Veilleux \& Osterbrock (1987). Theoretical and empirical
demarcation lines were proposed by Kewley et al. (2001) and Kauffmann et al. (2003)
to separate star-forming galaxies on the BPT diagrams, respectively.
Kewley et al. (2006) recently proposed a new empirical
classification scheme that separates Seyferts and LINERs.

However, LINERs are diverse in their observational properties.
Ho et al. (1993) identified a group of LINER/\ion{H}{2} ``transition objects'' with relatively low
[\ion{O}{1}]/H$\alpha$ ratios compared with ``pure'' LINERs. They proposed
that the LINER/\ion{H}{2} objects are most likely composite systems that contain
a LINER plus an \ion{H}{2} region. Many studies found that
these ``transition'' LINERs differ from the ``pure'' ones in their stellar
population distributions (e.g., Cid Fernandes et al. 2004; Kewley et al. 2006).
Wang \& Wei (2008) and Xiao et al. (in preparation) show that all their broad-line LINERs
are associated with large [\ion{O}{1}]/H$\alpha$ ratios and old stellar populations.

LINERs have been under hot debate in origin for a long time.
The photoionization by the central
AGNs is suggested to be a main power source in some LINERs (e.g., Ferland \& Netzer 1983).
The AGN origin is strongly supported by the
detection of broad emission lines in optical spectra (e.g., Ho et al. 1997; Wang \& Wei 2008).
Other evidence supporting the AGN origin includes the hard X-ray spectra
(e.g., Terashima et al. 2000; Flohic et al. 2006),
and UV variability (e.g., Maoz et al. 2005). On the other hand,
LINERs could be explained by other
excitation mechanisms unrelated to an AGN, such as fast shocks (e.g., Dopita et al. 1997;
Lipari et al. 2004), post-AGB stars (Binette et al. 1994),
or low mass X-ray binaries (e.g., Eracleous et al. 2002; Flohic et al. 2006).

At present, these results imply that the current classification scheme results in a hybrid LINER
population (different power sources or evolution stages).
In this letter, we study the classification scheme through several different approaches, and
show that the currently classified LINERs consist of two populations
that can be clearly separated on the BPT diagrams. The distinct
two populations might have different physical origins, and be at different evolutionary stages.

\section{BROAD-LINE LINERS: A ZONE OF AVOIDANCE IN THE BPT DIAGRAMS}

Wang \& Wei (2008) and Xiao et al. (in preparation)\footnote{Xiao et al. searched
for partially obscured AGNs from the galaxies (the median S/N ratio per pixel $\geq30$)
located above the Kauffmann demarcation line according to measurements given in the
MPA/JHU catalog by the same method described in Wang \& Wei (2008).
}
systematically searched for
partially obscured AGNs from the MPA/JHU SDSS DR4 catalog
(Heckman \& Kauffmann 2006 and references therein) according to the existence
of broad H$\alpha$ emission in the spectra\footnote{The partially obscured AGNs are
selected if $F_w/\sigma_c\geq3$, where $F_w$ is the stellar continuum subtracted
flux averaged over the rest frame
wavelength range from 6500 to 6530\AA, and $\sigma_c$ is the standard deviation of flux
within wavelength region between 5980 and 6020\AA.}.
Figure 1 shows the distributions of these partially obscured AGNs on the three
commonly used BPT diagrams.
The objects from Wang \& Wei (2008) and from
Xiao et al. are displayed by the red solid and open squares,
respectively. Indeed, the detection of broad H$\alpha$ emission is strongly
affected by the contamination of diffuse light from the old stars.
A large effect is expected in the SDSS spectra, especially
for weak nuclear emission, since the spectra are obtained by a relatively
large fiber aperture (3\symbol{125}).
The nearby broad-line LINERs identified in
the Palomar spectroscopic surveys (Ho et al. 1997) are therefore included
to avoid the bias.
These objects are shown in Figure 1 by the blue circles.

Based on the combined sample, although it is not clear in the [\ion{O}{3}]/H$\beta$ vs.
[\ion{N}{2}]/H$\alpha$ diagram, a remarkable zone of avoidance (ZOA) is obviously found in the
other two diagrams, especially in the [\ion{O}{3}]/H$\beta$ vs. [\ion{O}{1}]/H$\alpha$ diagram,
for the broad-line LINERs. The non-detection of broad H$\alpha$ in the
objects within the ZOA can not be caused by the increasing contribution
of young stars, both because young stars show less contamination caused by the stellar absorptions
at the H$\alpha$ region and because Seyfert galaxies have stellar population ages younger than
LINERs (see Figure 11 in Kewley et al. 2006). We examined the high quality spectra of LIRGs (Cao et al. 2006)
located in the ZOA one by one by eyes, and the results reinforce the non-detection of broad
H$\alpha$.
The ZOA naturally suggests that the previously
defined LINERs likely consist of at least two types of galaxies with distinct power sources.
In each panel, we define an empirical lower boundary for these broad-line LINERs by eye, and
plot the boundary by a short-dashed line.
The regions above and below the line is defined as Zone A
and B for short, respectively.

\section{WHAT IS IN THE ZOA?}

The lack of broad-line LINERs naturally motivates
us to suspect that the LINERs in the Zone B are powered by the ionizing radiation
arising from some stellar processes unrelated to an AGN.
The host properties are investigated in two aspects in this section: infrared emission and
occurrence of core-collapse supernovae (cc-SNe).

\subsection{Ultra-luminous/luminous Infrared LINERs}

Cao et al. (2006)
established a large sample of luminous infrared galaxies
(LIRGs, defined as $L_{\mathrm{IR}}>10^{11}L_\odot$) through the cross-identification
of the SDSS DR2 with the catalogs of the \it IRAS \rm survey.
Figure 2 shows the distributions of the sample on the three BPT diagrams.
The LIRGs are shown by the cyan solid
and open triangles for the \it IRAS \rm faint and point sources, respectively.
As an additional test, the ultra-luminous infrared galaxies
(ULIRGs, $L_{\mathrm{IR}}>10^{12}L_\odot$) identified
in the \it IRAS \rm 1Jy sample (Kim \& Sanders 1998; Veilleux et al. 1999) are overplotted
in Figure 2 by the blue stars.

Similar as done in Sect. 2, we focus on the [\ion{O}{3}]/H$\beta$ vs.
[\ion{S}{2}]/H$\alpha$ and [\ion{O}{3}]/H$\beta$ vs. [\ion{O}{1}]/H$\alpha$ diagrams.
The diagrams clearly show that all the infrared luminous LINERs are remarkably
clustered in the Zone B defined previously, except only a few outliers.

\subsection{LINERs: Occurrence Of cc-SNe}

The occurrence of cc-SNe is an indicative of young and intermediate-aged
stellar populations. The cc-SNe are believed
to be produced by the explosion of massive stars ($\geq8-10M_\odot$) at the
end of their life time ($\sim10^{7.5}$yr).
We cross-match the SDSS DR6 with the SAI-SDSS image SN catalog originally
done by Prieto et al. (2008). The sample finally contains the SDSS spectra of host
galaxies (central 3\symbol{125}) of 51 type Ib/c and 182 type II SNe.
We remove the absorption features from the spectra
through the PCA technique as described in Wang \& Wei (2008).
The emission line fluxes are then measured by the direct integration on the starlight-subtracted
spectra. The distributions of these galaxies on the three BPT diagrams are plotted in Figure 2.
As same as the results given before, the LINERs selected by the occurrence of cc-SNe are mainly
located in the Zone B.

\section{COMPARISON BETWEEN THE TWO POPULATIONS OF LINERS}

The above statistical study indicates that
the currently classified LINERs could be obviously
separated into two categories on the traditional BPT diagrams.
The separation is
most remarkable in the [\ion{O}{1}]/H$\alpha$ vs. [\ion{O}{3}]/H$\beta$ diagram:
a) population I LINERs within the Zone A have large [\ion{O}{1}]/H$\alpha$ ratios;
b) population II LINERs within the Zone B have low [\ion{O}{1}]/H$\alpha$ ratios.
The two populations show distinct observational properties that are
compared with each other in Table 1. In addition to the observational properties
described above, the two populations are also different in their host
stellar population ages. The stellar population is found to be on average younger in
population II LINERs than in population I LINERs
(e.g., Kewley et al. 2006; Wang \& Wei 2008;
Cid Fernandes et al. 2004; Gonzalez Delgado et al. 2004;
Sarzi et al. 2005)\footnote{The over detected young stellar population in the ``transition''
LINERs are recently argued against by Ho (2008). The author believes that the over
detection rate might be caused by the Hubble type bias.}.

The distinct observational properties imply that the two population LINERs have
different excitation mechanisms.
For the population I LINERs, one naturally expects that the gas is
photoionized by the ionizing radiation arising from the central
accretion disk due to the detection of the broad lines in their spectra. Not as
luminous AGNs, a weak ionizing radiation ($\log U\sim -3- -4$) with a hard
spectrum is required to explain the emission-line spectra of LINERs
(e.g., Kewley et al. 2006; Lewis et al. 2003; Sabra et al. 2003; Gabel et al. 2000).
Indeed, the hard X-ray spectra are observed in some LINERs by different instruments
(e.g., Flochi et al. 2006; Gliozzi et al. 2008; Rinn et al., 2005).
The low level and hard ionizing radiation is consistent with the predictions of
the advection dominated accretion model (e.g., Abramowicz et al. 1995; Narayan et al. 1995)
in which the inefficient radiation results in a hot accretion disk.
Finally, the non-detection of luminous infrared emission
and cc-SNe in the objects could be interpreted by both weak accretion activity
and aged stellar population.

The explanation of the excitation mechanism is, however, non-trivial for the population II
LINERs. The non-detection of broad lines in their spectra implies that they
are plausibly related to the stellar processes (see also in Ho 2008).
Comparisons of X-ray and optical observations show an anomalous high H$\alpha$ emission
for the ``transition'' LINERs (e.g., Ho 2008; Terashima \& Wilson 2003; Flochi et al. 2006).
The fast shock model could be excluded at first because the observed UV high excitation
emission lines are always lower than the predicted ones (e.g., Gabel et al. 2000; Maoz et al. 1998).
The young star cluster model (Barth \& shields 2000) requires extremely young stellar populations and sizable
Wolf-Rayet stars that are, however, not observed (e.g., Ho et al. 2003).
The ``transition'' LINERs are suspected to be composite systems that
consist of a LINER and an \ion{H}{2} region component, which, however,
can not explain the non-detection of broad emission line in the population II LINERs.

The LINER-like spectra can be ionized by evolved, low massive stars.
The spectral synthesis model shows
that the ionizing photon is dominated by the emission from the post-AGBs after $\sim10^8$yr since
the burst (Binette et al. 1994). A simple calculation recently done by Ho (2008) suggests
that the post-AGB stars within the center of galaxies can provide sufficient ionizing photons in the
``transition'' LINERs. In particular, the post-AGB star models
predict a low [\ion{O}{1}]/H$\alpha$ ratio ($<0.5$)
for reasonable parameters (Binette et al. 1994; Stasinska et al. 2008),
which is quantitatively in agreement with the current boundary separating the population I and II LINERs.
The post-AGB star model is also consistent with the observed infrared properties.
One of the characteristic features of post-AGB stars are their strong infrared excess. We estimate
the infrared luminosity for individual post-AGB star as
$L_{\mathrm{IR}}^*/L_\odot=1.77f(r/\mathrm{pc})^2 (T_\mathrm{d}/\mathrm{K})^4$
in two fiducial cases: $r=0.01$pc, $T_d=200$K and $r=0.1$pc, $T_d=80$K (Suarez et al. 2006),
where $r$ is the distance from the dust shell to star, $T_\mathrm{d}$
is the temperature of the dust and $f=0.004$ is the emissivity of the dust (Draine \& Lee 1984).
The total infrared luminosity from the dust is then $L_{\mathrm{IR}}=L_{\mathrm{IR}}^*(M/M_*)$,
where $M$ and $M_*$ is the integrated post-AGB star mass
and mass of individual post-AGB star (i.e., $M_*=1-8M_\odot$).
Adopting the typical integrated stellar mass of galaxy center $\sim2\times10^9 M_\odot$ and the Salpeter
IMF results in a roughly estimated integrated infrared luminosity $\sim10^{10.7-12} L_\odot$,
which is (marginally) in agreement with the definition of LIRGs (ULIRGs).
Note that the estimated infrared luminosity should be strictly regarded as an upper limit
because the exact value strongly depends on star formation history of galaxy.
Finally, the occurrence of cc-SNe in
the population II LINERs provides evidence in timescale supporting the post-AGB star model.
As massive stars explode at the end of their lifetimes $\sim10^{7.5}$yr, the low- and intermediate-mass
stars (1-8$M_\odot$) evolve to the AGB and post-AGB phase at the end of their main sequence
lifetimes with an upper limit $\sim5\times10^7$yr.

\section{IMPLICATIONS ON AGN'S EVOLUTION}

We briefly discuss the implications on the AGN's evolutionary scenario in the context
of the coevolution of AGN and its host galaxy.
Some recent studies suggest a delay (with time scale $\sim100$Myr) between the onset of the star formation
and the subsequent intensive black hole accretion
(e.g., Davis et al. 2007; Kawakatu et al. 2003; Granato et al. 2004).
In this scenario, the emission lines might be dominantly excited by the massive starburst
at the very beginning of an AGN activity.
The central accretion nucleus is either obscured (e.g. Hopkins et al. 2005, Wada \& Norman 2002)
or too weak to maintain a BLR
(e.g., Laor 2003; Xu \& Cao 2007; Nicastro et al. 2003; Elitzur \& Shlosman 2006).
The accretion activity might increase within the first a few of $10^8$yr
as the very young circumnuclear stellar
population ages (Davis et al. 2007).
After the first a few of $10^8$yr, when the AGN is still buried or weak,
the emission lines are dominantly excited by the ionizing radiation from post-AGB stars
(i.e., the population I LINER phase).
Sturm et al. (2006) indicated that IR-bright LINERs have intermediate PAH feature ratios
(12.7$\mu$m/11.2$\mu$m and 6.2$\mu$m/11.2$\mu$m) between \ion{H}{2} region and IR-faint LINERs.
At this phase, the post-AGB stars contribute the luminous
infrared emission, and the evolved massive stars explode at the end of their lives.
A luminous AGN subsequently appears, and shines with decreasing
Eddington ratio as the stellar population continuously ages (Wang \& Wei 2008;
Kewley et al. 2006). After the luminous phase,
the AGN evolves to a less luminous stage with hard ionizing radiation (i.e., population I LINER
phase). The underlying very old stellar population becomes dominant because the
importance of the young stellar population fades out entirely.

\section{SUMMARY}

The previously defined LINERs are found to consist of two categories that can
be clearly separated in the traditional BPT diagrams, especially in the
[\ion{O}{1}]/H$\alpha$ vs. [\ion{O}{3}]/H$\beta$ diagram. Population I LINERs
are defined to have higher [\ion{O}{1}]/H$\alpha$ ratios than
Population II LINERs. The two population LINERs differs in the presence of
broad emission lines in their spectra, strength of infrared emission, host galaxy stellar population age,
and occurrence of cc-SNe. These different properties suggest
that the two populations not only have different line excitation mechanisms,
but also are at different evolution stages.

\acknowledgments
We would like to thank the anonymous referee for valuable comments and
suggestions that help to improve the paper.
This work is supported by the National Science Foundation of China under
grants 10503005 and 10803008, and by the National Basic Research Program of China
(grant 2009CB824800).

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO); Astrophysics of Galaxies (astro-ph.GA)


Having it Both Ways: Distinguishable Yet Phase-Coherent Mixtures of Bose-Einstein Condensates

Abstract: We have begun a series of experiments on mixed bosonic quantum fluids. Our system is mixed Bose-Einstein condensates in dilute Rb-87. By simultaneously trapping the atoms in two different hyperfine states, we are able to study the dynamics of component separation and of the relative quantum phase of two interpenetrating condensates. Population can be converted from one state to the other at a rate that is sensitive to the relative phase.

\section{INTRODUCTION}
\label{introduction}

The observation of Bose-Einstein condensation (BEC) in a dilute gas
\cite{jila,mit,rice} has led to a new generation of experiments in
quantum fluids.  Historically, in the study of quantum fluids, some of
the most intriguing behavior has been found in the behavior of fluid
mixtures.  We have thus been motivated to pursue a series of
mixed-condensate experiments in Rubidium-87.  \cite{myatt, mike,
  david1, david2} The experimental tools and the theoretical
world view of atomic physics are almost entirely disjoint from those
of traditional low-temperature physics, and this lack of overlap has
led to some confusion. The purpose of this paper is to review some of
our early results on mixed condensates, and to provide a qualitative
exegesis of the theoretical and experimental techniques that underpin
our work.  Of necessity we have omitted here much of the detail
provided in the original papers. \cite{myatt,mike,david1,david2} The
MIT BEC group also has begun experiments in mixed condensates.
\cite{mitwork}

The experiments described here all begin with a sample of
approximately $5 \times 10^5$ spin-aligned, Bose-condensed Rb-87 atoms
at a temperature of less than 50~nK, confined in a 3-d, harmonic
magnetic potential at density $1 \times 10^{14}/{\mathrm {cm}}^3$.
The number density of noncondensed atoms is a factor of 30 or more
smaller.  In this paper we will skip the details of refrigeration ---
the technique is a hybrid method that combines many of the notable
advances \cite{cool1980} in atom cooling from the 1980s: laser cooling
and trapping, magnetic trapping, and evaporative cooling.  The
synthesis of these various approaches was begun at JILA from 1989--1992
\cite {vaporcell, lowroad}, but it was only after considerable
additional development \cite{darkspot,cmot,mitevap,top} that, in 1995,
the parts worked well enough together to permit the first observation
of BEC in dilute atomic gases \cite{jila,mit,rice}.  In the current
version of our apparatus, the cooling process is automated and
reliable, much like a (well-behaved) dilution refrigerator. A freshly
prepared condensate is available for study about once per minute.  The
isolation of the sample from the 300~K environment (less than 1~cm
away) is excellent --- thermal equilibration times with the environment
are on the order of centuries --- but residual heating and the
collisional decay of the condensate limit the duration of an
experiment on any given condensate to a few seconds.

The ground state of an Rb-87 atom is split in a magnetic field into
eight levels by hyperfine and Zeeman interactions
(Fig.~\ref{fig:levels}). The states labelled $\left|1\right>$,
$\left|2\right>$, and $\left|3\right>$ can be trapped at a local
minimum in the magnetic field; it is with states $\left|1\right>$ and
$\left|2\right>$ ($\left|F=1,m=-1\right>$, and $\left|F=2,
  m=1\right>$, respectively) that we have performed most of our
mixed-fluids experiments. \cite {decaysup,opttrap} The other relevant
internal structure of the Rb-87 atom is a set of excited-state levels
1.6~eV above the ground state (Fig.~\ref{fig:levels}).  We probe the
spatial distribution of the atoms by imaging the absorption on an
optical transition to these levels.  The natural 6~MHz linewidth of
the optical transition is much less than the energy splitting between,
for instance, states $\left|1\right>$ and $\left|2\right>$. With the
correct choice of laser frequency, we can image the spatial
distribution of either state $\left|1\right>$ or of state
$\left|2\right>$, or, if we prefer, of the combined density of the two
states.\cite{mike}

\begin{figure}
\centerline{\psfig{file=states.eps,height=2.75in}}
\caption{The relevant hyperfine and Zeeman structure of Rb-87 in a
magnetic field. The atoms are moved coherently from state $\left|1\right>$  to
state $\left|2\right>$  with a microwave pulse\protect\cite{twophoton}.
Imaging is accomplished via
absorption in optical transitions to the excited states. }
\label{fig:levels}
\end{figure}

The paradoxical aspect of the Rb-87 mixed-condensate system is that it
combines two traits that are usually thought of as mutually
exclusive: (i) the $\left|1\right>$ and $\left|2\right>$ components of
the condensate are distinguishable, in the usual senses of the term
--- the components do not at experimental energy scales spontaneously
interconvert, and the components can be selectively detected and
imaged; and (ii) the components possess a measurable relative quantum
phase, which evolves at a rate proportional to the difference in
chemical potential between the two fluids, and which can, under the
right circumstances, be read out, much as the current across a
Josephson junction reads out the relative quantum phase across it.
Interconversion (and phase read-out) {\it can} be driven via a
stimulated process and therefore can be turned on and off. The system
thus bears considerable resemblance to the idealized pair of
condensates linked by a removable Josephson junction that Leggett
\cite{leggett} and others have envisioned in various thought
experiments.

In Section~2 we will discuss distinguishable-fluid experiments; in
Section~3 we discuss simple phase-coherent experiments; in Section~4
we discuss experiments that combine the two aspects; and in Section~5
we mention various future experiments with weak coupling.

\section{INTERPENETRATING, DISTINGUISHABLE FLUIDS}
\label{interpenetrating}

Species $\left|1\right>$ and $\left|2\right>$ meet both usual criteria
for calling fluids ``distinguishable.'' One can in the literal sense
distinguish one density distribution from the other, simply by
adjusting the frequency of the probe laser so that one species or the
other casts its shadow onto our imaging CCD array
(Fig.~\ref{fig:levels}). This measurement, as performed in
Refs.~\citen{mike,david1,david2}, is destructive, but as has been shown
\cite{MITdisp} it needn't be so. In any case the fact that we can
prepare condensates with a high repetition rate and a large degree of
reproducibility means that the destructive aspect of the imaging is
not very important to us: we observe the time-evolution of the clouds
simply by repeating the experiment many times with increasing
dwell-times.  The second sense of ``distinguishable'' is that particles
do not spontaneously interconvert.  This requirement is enforced in
our system by the enormous difference in internal energies between the
two states. In the absence of applied electromagnetic fields, the
6.8~GHz hyperfine energy (Fig.~\ref{fig:levels}) is a million times
larger than any other energy scale of the condensate system. The
energy released by a {\it single} atom converting from state
$\left|2\right>$ to state $\left|1\right>$, if that energy were to be
distributed thermally through our sample, is sufficient to drive
the {\it entire sample} out of the Bose-condensed state.  The fact
that we don't observe our condensates melting during our measurements
is a guarantee that spontaneous interconversion is not a factor in the
system.

The positions of the two fluids are determined by the their respective
confining magnetic potentials.  The magnetic moments of the two states
are nominally the same, but due to various small effects --- gravity,
the nuclear magnetic moment, the onset of nonlinearity in the Zeeman
shifts, and subtle dynamical effects \cite{top,spie} of our magnetic
trap --- the location of the two minima of the confining potentials
$V_1(r)$ and $V_2(r)$ can be adjusted to be either exactly coincident
or slightly offset.  For the work described here, the confining
potentials are axially symmetric and harmonic, with single-particle
oscillation frequencies of $\omega_z/2\pi = 60$~Hz, and $\omega_r/2\pi
= 21$~Hz.  With the spatial offset between the two potentials set to
zero, and in the absence of interspecies interactions, the two fluids would
be completely interpenetrating.  In fact, inter- (and intra-) species
interactions are a dominant factor in determining the density
distributions. The dynamics are well-described in the mean-field
language of coupled Gross-Pitaevskii equations for the order
parameters: \cite{twobectheory}

\begin{equation}
  i\hbar\dot{\Phi}_1 = \left(-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\nabla^2 + V_1 + u_1
    |\Phi_1|^2 + u_{12}|\Phi_2|^2\right)\Phi_1
\label{gpe1a}
\end{equation}
and
\begin{equation}
  i\hbar\dot{\Phi}_2 = \left(-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\nabla^2 + V_2 +
    V_{\mathrm{hf}} + u_2|\Phi_2|^2 + u_{21}|\Phi_1|^2 \right)\Phi_2
\label{gpe1b}
\end{equation}
where $m$ is the mass of the Rb atom, $V_{\mathrm{hf}}$ is the
magnetic field-dependent hyperfine splitting between the two states in
the absence of interactions, $u_i = 4\pi\hbar^2a_i/m$ and $u_{ij} =
4\pi\hbar^2a_{ij}/m$, $|\Phi_i|^2$ is the condensate density, and the
intraspecies and interspecies scattering lengths are $a_i$ and
$a_{ij}=a_{ji}$. Note that these equations do not allow for species
interconversion; they conserve independently the number of atoms in
each species.

Considerable theoretical work has already gone into studying
ground-state solutions \cite{twobectheory} and small-amplitude
excitations \cite{twobecex} of the order parameters. We review here
the results most relevant to the current experiments. As the total
number of atoms trapped increases, the quantum kinetic energy term
$\nabla^2 \Phi$ becomes less significant, until it is almost
negligible for the numbers used in double-condensate experiments.
Most theoretical treatments neglect this term, thus making the
so-called Thomas-Fermi approximation. In this case, the steady-state,
single-component condensate density profile in a parabolic potential
will have an inverted parabaloid density profile, with density
tapering smoothly from the peak at cloud center to zero at its edge.
Due to an accidental degeneracy \cite{myatt,greenestuff} in the Rb-87
scattering system, $a_1 \approx a_{12} \approx a_2$.  For this special
case, one can see by inspection of Eqs.~\ref{gpe1a} and~\ref{gpe1b}
that the steady-state total density of a two-component BEC will also
have an inverted parabola form, even though the relative densities of
the components may have intricate structure.  It turns out there is a
critical value \cite{twobectheory} for the interaction term $a_{12}^c
= \sqrt{a_1 a_2} $.  For $a_{12}>a_{12}^c$, two components should have
little spatial overlap --- they should spontaneously separate in the
trap, while for $a_{12}<a_{12}^c$, there should be a relatively large
region of interpenetration.  In Rb-87, the scattering lengths are
known at the 1\% level to be in the proportion
$a_1:a_{12}:a_2::1.03:1:0.97$, with the average of the three being
55(3)~\AA~\cite{mike,greenestuff,Burke_PVT}.

Since the mutual interaction term is within 1\% of its critical value,
anything that breaks the symmetry between the two species becomes
important.  For instance, the fact that $a_1 > a_2$ means it is
energetically favorable for the $\left|1\right>$ atoms to
preferentially move towards the lower density region at the periphery
of the cloud, forming a spherical shell around
$\left|2\right>$,\cite{twobectheory} but since the difference between
$a_1$ and $a_2$ is small, even a rather minor vertical offset in the
spatial centers of $V_1$ and $V_2$ will result in the components'
separating up-and-down, rather than radially in-and-out.  In
steady-state, then, one expects the clouds to be largely, although not
completely \cite{kinsepeng} spatially separated.  Further, because the
steady-state energetics only modestly favor component separation, one
would expect that in the ensuing dynamical behavior, small
oscillations about the steady-state configuration\cite{twobecex} will
feature a number of ``soft'' modes, with frequencies low compared to
the excitations of the total density.

\begin{figure}
\centerline{\psfig{file=contour.eps,height=2.25in}}
\caption{Contour plot of the expanded \protect\cite{expand}
  density distribution after the two components have undergone
  separation and their relative motions have damped.  The image is 182
  microns square.  Before expansion the size of the total distribution
  was 40 by 14 microns. Note that a considerable region of
  interpenetration remains.  }
\label{fig:densityprofile}
\end{figure}

All of these qualitative theoretical expectations have been borne out
in preliminary experiments.\cite{david1}.
Figure~\ref{fig:densityprofile} shows the density profile
\cite{expand} of two condensates after they have come to steady-state.
In this measurement, the potentials have been offset a distance equal
to only 3\% of the overall sample size, but the resulting component
separation is much larger.  Note however that there does remain a
region of overlap, which is useful for work described below.  The
$\left|2\right>$ component is originally created (as described in
Section~3.2, below) such that it completely overlaps the $\left|1\right>$
component, and we have observed\cite{david1} the time evolution of the
component separation as it relaxes to the steady-state, separated
condition. During this time, the overall density profile is
essentially unperturbed.  The period of the resulting damped
oscillations of the relative positions of the two components is about
30~ms. In comparison, the period of the lowest-order nontrivial
excitation of the total density profile is about 25~ms.

If we do not deliberately break symmetry of the confining potentials
in the experiment but rather keep them as perfectly overlapped as
possible, we see, at early times, the onset of the expected
inward-outward component separation.  At longer times the inner ball
of $\left|2\right>$ atoms does not stay well-centered in the hollow
shell of $\left|1\right>$ atoms, but drifts horizontally towards a
preferred side. There appears to be an as-yet uncharacterized
imperfection in the trap that breaks the radial symmetry of the
experimental environment.

The Rubidium-87 mixture is well-suited to a variety of experiments in
mixtures of dilute bose gases.  There are a host of experimental
parameters to explore: the radial:axial aspect ratio of the confining
potential (from 3:1 to greater than 1:30, depending on the form of
magnetic trap used); the relative number in the two components; and the
temperature. The critical temperature of a particular component
depends on the number of atoms in that state.  Thus, one can arrange
for one component to remain in the condensed state while the other one
converts from the normal to the condensed state or \emph{vice-versa}.
All of these changes will have profound effects on the steady-state
configuration and the spectrum of collective excitations. For example,
imagine an experiment to study the effects of finite temperature on
the excitations.\cite{finiteT} At finite temperature, there will be in
effect four different co-trapped fluids: normal and condensate
fractions of both components. The normal fraction of a given component
will find the condensate fraction of its own component twice as
repulsive as it finds the condensate fraction of a dissimilar
component (due to exchange terms.)  Thus if one chooses a potential in
which condensate $\left|1\right>$ and condensate $\left|2\right>$
tend to spatially separate, one can have a situation in which the
normal fraction of component $\left|1\right>$ tends to preferentially
collect at the spatial location of condensate $\left|2\right>$, and
{\it vice-versa}. What will the collective excitation spectrum look
like? If we were to describe these excitations with the word
``sound,'' what ordinal number should modify it?

\section{PHASE COHERENCE}
\label{phasecoherence}

In the absence of any applied coupling the 6.8~GHz energy separation
between the two states is enormous, but the presence of a oscillating
magnetic field tuned close to the hyperfine splitting changes the
situation dramatically.  An atom can readily be transferred from one
state to the other --- the difference in energy is absorbed from (or
stimulated into) the coherent field of 6.8~GHz photons.
\cite{twophoton} That the population transfer resulting from the
application of a coupling field is sensitive to the relative phase of
the two states is well-known in microwave spectroscopy \cite{ramsey}
and NMR and is easy to understand in the case of a single, two-level
atom.

\subsection{Single-Atom Case}
\label{singleatom}

The Schr\"odinger equation \cite{dshplease} for the internal state of
a two-level atom (or of any two-level quantum system) in the presence
of a coupling drive at frequency $\omega_{\mathrm{rf}}$ is

\begin{equation}
  i\dot{A}_1= \omega_1A_1 + \frac{\Omega}{2} e^{i \omega_{\mathrm{rf}}t}A_2
\label{schr1a}
\end{equation}

\begin{equation}
  i\dot{A}_2= \omega_2A_2 + \frac{\Omega^*}{2} e^{-i
  \omega_{\mathrm{rf}}t}A_1
\label{schr1b}
\end{equation}

\noindent{where $A_i$ is the probability amplitudes to be in state
  $\left|i\right>$, $\hbar\omega_i$ is the internal energy of state
  $\left|i\right>$, and $\Omega$ is the amplitude of the coupling.  We
  assume the detuning $\delta \equiv
  \omega_{\mathrm{rf}}-\omega_2+\omega_1$ is small, such that
  $|\delta|\ll \omega_{\mathrm{rf}}$, and concentrate on the case
  that the coupling drive is off ($\Omega=0$) most of the time and
  on only for brief pulses of duration $\tau$, such that $1/\tau \gg
  \left|\delta\right|$.  When we discuss ``phase'' in this context, we
  are talking about the real quantities $\alpha_1$, $\alpha_2$, or
  $\alpha_{\mathrm{rf}}$ defined in the relations $A_1 = |A_1|e^{i \alpha_1}$,
  $A_2 = |A_2|e^{i \alpha_2}$, and $\Omega e^{- \omega_{\mathrm{rf}}t}
  = |\Omega |e^{i \alpha_{\mathrm{rf}}}$.

  There is one particularly useful special-case solution of
  Eqs.~\ref{schr1a} and~\ref{schr1b}.  A pulse with duration and
  amplitude such that $|\Omega|\tau= \frac{\pi}{2}$ is known as a
  ``$\frac{\pi}{2}$-pulse.'' If the atom is initially in state
  $\left|1\right>$ with unit probability ({\it i.e.}, $|A_1|=1$ and
  $|A_2|=0$), then after the application of the pulse the atom will
  have equal probability of being in either state ({\it i.e.},
  $|A_1|=1/\sqrt{2}$ and $|A_2|=1/\sqrt{2}$).  The
  $\frac{\pi}{2}$-pulse thus creates a 50-50 coherent superposition of
  the two states, also ``writing'' a particular initial relative
  phase. After the pulse is applied, the relative phase evolves at the
  rate $\omega_2-\omega_1$.  The accumulated phase can be measured by
  a second $\frac{\pi}{2}$-pulse.\cite{ramsey} When a
  $\frac{\pi}{2}$-pulse is applied to a two-level system in 50-50
  coherent superposition, the population transferred by the pulse from
  state $\left|1\right>$ to state $\left|2\right>$ is proportional to
  $\cos(\alpha_1-\alpha_2-\alpha_{\mathrm{rf}})$, where the phases
  $\alpha$ refer to the total phase accumulated during the dwell time
  $T$ between the two pulses.  One measures the transition probability
  from state 1 to state 2 by repeating the experiment for different
  $T$; the result is ``Ramsey fringes,'' a cosine at the detuning
  frequency $\delta$. This technique is known as the method of
  separated oscillatory fields \cite{ramsey} or ``twin-pulse''
  spectroscopy.

\subsection{Application to Order Parameters}
\label{orderparam}

\begin{figure}
\centerline{\psfig{file=ramsey.eps,height=2.25in}}
\caption{Population transfer from $\left|1\right>$  to  $\left|2\right>$
resulting from twin $\frac{\pi}{2}$-pulse
coupling pulses, as a function of delay between the two pulses.
The first pulse prepares the condensate
in an equal superposition of the two states, the second pulse induces
further population transfer sensitive to the relative phase that has
evolved during the pulse separation time. The coupling drive is detuned
from the energy difference between the two condensates by about 360~Hz.}
\label{fig:ramseyfringes}
\end{figure}

Now it becomes clear how we modify Eqs.~\ref{gpe1a} and~\ref{gpe1b} to
include a coupling field applied to a bose condensate:

\begin{equation}
  i\hbar\dot{\Phi}_1 =
  \left(-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\nabla^2 + V_1 +
                u_1 |\Phi_1|^2 + u_{12}|\Phi_2|^2\right)\Phi_1
  + \frac{\hbar\Omega(t)}{2}e^{i\omega_{\mathrm{rf}}t}\Phi_2
\label{gpe2a}
\end{equation}
and
\begin{equation}
  i\hbar\dot{\Phi}_2 = \left(-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\nabla^2 +
                V_2 +
    V_{\mathrm{hf}} + u_2|\Phi_2|^2 + u_{21}|\Phi_1|^2 \right)\Phi_2 +
  \frac{\hbar\Omega(t)}{2}e^{-i\omega_{\mathrm{rf}}t}\Phi_1
\label{gpe2b}
\end{equation}

\noindent{The probability amplitudes $A_i$ of Eqs.~\ref{schr1a}
  and~\ref{schr1b} have now become field amplitudes $\Phi_i$, and the
  physics has become correspondingly richer. One can still perform
  experiments, however, that explore simple limits.}

In one such experiment, we begin with atoms in the pure
$\left|1\right>$, relaxed to a steady-state, near-pure condensate with
spatial distribution described by $\Phi_{0}$.  Next we apply a
$\frac{\pi}{2}$-pulse, transferring half the population to state
$\left|2\right>$.  Immediately after the $\frac{\pi}{2}$-pulse, the
two-state system can be described by $\Phi_1 =
\Phi_{0}e^{i\mu_1t}/\sqrt {2}$, and $\Phi_2 =
\Phi_{0}e^{i\mu_2t}/\sqrt {2}$, where $\mu_1$ and $\mu_2$, which
differ by about the hyperfine frequency, are the chemical potentials
of the two components. We know however that this perfectly overlapping
state is not the steady-state of the mixed BEC system; this is in fact
the point of departure for the relaxation-to-equilibrium experiments
described in Section 2.1. Within a matter of a few tens of
milliseconds the components will separate, but on shorter time scales,
the condensates don't have time to realize that they are a pair of
mutually repulsive quantum fluids. One could equally well describe the
system at short times as a single condensate containing about a
million atoms, each in an internal, coherent superposition governed by
Eqs.~\ref{schr1a} and~\ref{schr1b}. Figure~\ref{fig:ramseyfringes}
shows the result of applying a second $\frac{\pi}{2}$-pulse
immediately, and then measuring the final number of atoms in the
$\left|2\right>$ state.  The high-contrast Ramsey fringes that result
are much as one would expect from a similar experiment performed on,
for instance, an atomic beam.\cite{ramsey} This ``conventional''
response of condensates at short times to coupling drives has also
been seen in condensate Rabi oscillations.\cite{mike,outputcoupler}

\section{COHERENT FLUIDS}
\label{coherentfluids}

\begin{figure}
\centerline{\psfig{file=ramsey2.eps,height=2.25in}}
\caption{Population transfer from $\left|1\right>$  to $\left|2\right>$
  resulting from twin $\frac{\pi}{2}$-pulse coupling pulses, as a
  function of delay between the two pulses.  Results are similar to
  those shown in Fig.~\protect\ref{fig:ramseyfringes}, except that
  over the longer duration the components physically separate --- the
  loss of spatial overlap reduces the contrast ratio of the Ramsey
  fringes. }
\label{fig:ramseyfading}
\end{figure}

If the system is allowed to evolve longer after the first
$\frac{\pi}{2}$-pulse, so that the components begin to separate, it is
no longer very useful to describe the system as a single condensate of
atoms in a superposition state. One should think of them instead as
distinct fluids evolving their separate ways, albeit (as we shall see)
with a well-defined relative phase.  The effects of component
separation show up clearly in twin-pulse spectroscopy:
Figure~\ref{fig:ramseyfading} shows some condensate Ramsey fringes
collected over longer periods. The loss of contrast in the fringes is
not due to inhomogenous broadening of the atomic transition, at least
not in the conventional sense.  Rather, it arises from the dwindling
spatial overlap between the two components, which in turn arises from
the mutual repulsion of the components, as we saw in Section~2. During
component separation the components are of course moving with respect
to each other, and therefore there is a gradient in the relative phase
across the sample; it is no longer so simple to define a single
quantity as the phase differerence between the two clouds.

\begin{figure}
\centerline{\psfig{file=expt.eps,height=4.25in}}
\caption{A schematic \protect\cite{david2} of the condensate interferometer. (a) The
  experiment begins with all of the atoms in condensate
  $\left|1\right>$ at steady-state. (b) After the first
  $\frac{\pi}{2}$-pulse, the condensate has been split into two
  components with a well-defined initial relative phase. (c) The
  components begin to separate in a complicated fashion due to mutual
  repulsion as well as a $0.4~\mu$m vertical offset in the confining
  potentials (see also Fig.~3 of Ref.~\protect\citen{david1}). (d) The
  relative motion between the components eventually damps with the
  clouds mutually offset but with some residual overlap. Relative
  phase continues to accumulate between the condensates until (e) at
  time $T$ a second $\frac{\pi}{2}$-pulse remixes the components; the
  two possible paths by which the condensate can arrive in one of the
  two states in the hatched regions interfere.  (f) The cloud is
  released immediately after the second pulse and allowed to expand
  for imaging. In the case shown, the relative phase between the two
  states at the time of the second pulse was such as to lead to
  destructive interference in the $\left|1\right>$ state and a
  corresponding constructive interference in the $\left|2\right>$
  state.}
\label{fig:interscheme}
\end{figure}

At still longer inter-pulse times, the results of the twin-pulse
experiments become once again explainable in terms of a single
relative phase.  After the component-separation process has gone to
completion, the relative motion of the condensates damps, and
presumably the gradients of the relative phase vanish as well. As
shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:densityprofile} above, the post-separation
clouds preserve a reasonable amount of spatial overlap.  As shown
schematically in Fig.~\ref{fig:interscheme}, the application the
second $\frac{\pi}{2}$-pulse pulse at this time acts as sort of
recombiner on a separated-arm atom-interferometer\cite{pritchard}.
Depending on the relative phase between the two components, we can see
(Fig.~\ref{fig:postdampfringe}) destructive or constructive
interference in the region where the components overlap.  Thus, the
double-pulse experiment with a long-time between the pulses acts as a
condensate interferometer that allows us to determine the relative
phase between two largely separated condensate components.

\begin{figure}
\centerline{\psfig{file=latephi.eps,height=2.75in}}
\caption{The value of the condensate density in the
  $\left|2\right>$ state is extracted at the center of the overlap
  region (inset) and plotted as a function of $T$. Each point
  represents the average of 4~separate realizations and the thin bars
  denote the rms scatter in the measured interference for an
  individual realization.  The thick lines are sinusoidal fits to the
  data, from which we extract the
  angular frequency $\mu_2-\mu_1-\omega_{\mathrm{rf}}$. }
\label{fig:postdampfringe}
\end{figure}

We find the contrast ratio manifest in Fig.~\ref{fig:postdampfringe}
quite remarkable.  It is evidence that the two components have a
well-preserved memory of their relative phase \emph{even after} there
has been damping of the external degrees of freedom, with which the
internal states are entangled. The phase of the condensate evidently
has a robustness one would not expect in a single-particle experiment.
This is clearly an area worthy of extensive study -- how robust is the
relative phase, as a function of temperature, of relative equilibrium
separation, of time between pulses?  How well can the relative phase
survive a ``nondestructive'' observation \cite{MITdisp}, which can
take many sequential images of the same condensate? In single-atom
interferometry, the connection between the availability of
``which-path'' information and the loss of coherence has been
thoroughly examined.\cite{pritchard_dephase} How do these results
generalize to condensates?

\section{ADDITIONAL DIRECTIONS}
\subsection{Josephson Effects}
In the discussion so far the coupling drive was operated in the very
short-pulsed mode.  If instead it is applied as a weak, continuous
drive, it has correspondingly smaller bandwidth, such that it is
resonant in certain regions of the condensate, and off-resonant
elsewhere. Population transfer can be constrained to occur only within
a particular spatial region, for instance right at the overlap region,
and can show oscillatory but nonlinear behavior.  We are performing
experiments \cite{us_soon} in this regime, and are exploring the
close analogy \cite{jaime, josephson} between the resulting population
transfer and a nonlinear Josephson junction.

\subsection {Number States}
In experiments to date, the relative phase appears random if measured
more than 150~ms after the condensates are split. This could be due to
intrinsic decohering mechanisms, or it could be due to technical
instabilities.  It is diverting to contemplate, however, creating a
condensate pair for which from the very beginning the relative phase
is \emph{intrinsically} unpredictable.  The conjugate variable to the
relative phase is the number difference $\Delta N =N_1-N_2$.  For
experiments with relatively small total $N$, say less than 2000, it
may be possible to create states for which $N_1 \approx N_2 \approx
N/2$, with the uncertainty in $\Delta N$ less than plus or minus
1~atom.  Such a state, analogous to a highly squeezed state of light,
will have a completely undefined relative phase and could be useful
for performing sub-shotnoise spectroscopy, \cite{kasevich} and
illustrates some instructive paradoxes of quantum measurement theory.
\cite{juha}

\section*{ACKNOWLEDGMENTS}
This research is supported by the NSF, the ONR, and NIST.