Electro-optic properties of ZrO2, HfO2 and LiNbO3 ferroelectric phases: A comprehensive and comparative study with density functional theory

Abstract: We report the Pockels electro-optic properties of ZrO2 and HfO2 orthorhombic Pbc21 and rhombohedral R3m ferroelectric phases, and we compare them to the well-known LiNbO3 Pockels material from density functional theory calculations using the CRYSTAL suite of programs. Specifically, three essential processes are explicitly investigated: The electronic, the ionic (or vibrational), and the piezoelectric contributions. Our calculations reveal that the ionic part coming from the low frequency phonon modes contributes the most to the electro-optic coefficients of rhombohedral LiNbO3 and of orthorhombic ZrO2 and HfO2. While these low-frequency modes show zero contribution to Pockels coefficients for the rhombohedral phase of the latter compounds.

\section{Introduction} \label{s:intro}
Silicon photonics platforms are becoming indispensable for developing low-cost integrated photonic circuits. Electro-optic (EO) effect is one of the main properties required in plethora applications including optical communications \cite {Mohapatra2008, Melikyan2014, Rueda2019, Abel2019}, quantum computing \cite{OBrien2009, Wang2020}, and neuromorphic applications \cite {George2019, Shen2017, Offrein2020}. The principal physical process  behind these applications is the so-called Pockels or linear EO effect, which is related to the modulation of the refractive index of a material under an applied external electric field \cite {Lines2001}. Nevertheless,  due to its centrosymmetric atomistic crystalline structure, pristine silicon features vanishing second-order optical nonlinearities; thus, it is unsuitable for EO applications. Bearing in mind that second-order nonlinear optical (NLO) responses strictly manifest in non-centrosymmetric materials, ferroelectric (FE) crystalline solids have emerged as the main materials of choice in EO applications. Such materials exhibit an intrinsic electric polarization that, in addition, can be controlled and tuned in a reversible manner by the application of an external electric field. \\

In the realm of EO applications, the most studied FE materials are currently ABO$_3$ perovskite-type  crystalline solids.  A representative member of this family is lithium niobate (LiNbO$_3$, LNO), a ferroelectric material featuring a strong Pockels crystalline bulk coefficient (r$_{33}$) of about 30 pm/V \cite{Turner1966}. LNO is widely applied in  the telecommunications industry \cite {Wooten2000-reviewonLNO} and specifically in the fabrication of optical modulators. Despite LNO's complexity of integration on silicon substrates, several studies showed its compatibility with silicon photonics \cite {Wang2018, Rabiei2013HeterogeneousLN}. An additional appealing perovskite-type crystalline solid for EO applications is tetragonal ferroelectric barium titanate (BaTiO$_3$, BTO), featuring one of the highest Pockels bulk coefficients (r$_{42}$ $\approx$ 1300 pm/V) \cite {PRB-Zgonik1994}. However, the growth of high-quality BTO thin films on silicon without affecting its strong Pockels coefficient is still challenging and of high cost, although high-quality BTO films can be fabricated via molecular beam epitaxy (MBE), \cite {Abel2019, Messner2019, Xiong2014}. In addition to tetragonal BTO,  its rhombohedral R3m phase also gained attention for cryogenic technologies as, for instance, for quantum computing \cite {Paoletta-PRB-EO, Eltes2020}.

Recently, it has been demonstrated that among HfO$_{2}$-ZrO$_{2}$-based thin films, orthorhombic Pbc2$_1$  \cite {Boscke2011} and rhombohedral R3m \cite {Wei2018} phases exhibit ferroelectric behavior. This is a significant outcome in terms of practical applications because both HfO$_{2}$ and ZrO$_{2}$ have an excellent silicon compatibility \cite {8423435-Ali,doi:10.1063/1.3636417-Muller, Park-energystorage2014, Silva-energystorage2021}. Combined with their ferroelectric nature, this might lead to significant breakthroughs in the realm of integrated photonic circuits that could significantly reduce the fabrication cost. Nevertheless, there is still much work to be done since the film quality and the ferroelectricity of ZrO$_2$ and HfO$_2$ are not well optimized at high film thicknesses. This is critical for their optimal application due to the inverse proportionality between the optical losses and the film thickness \cite {fork_armani-leplingard_kingston_1994, Epitaxialferroelectricoxide}. In the case of the orthorhombic Pbc2$_1$ (o$-$phase), which is usually reported in polycrystalline thin films, ferroelectricity has been demonstrated in a large range of thickness from 1 nm to 1$\mu$m \cite {Cheema2020, undopedHfO2, Starschich2017, Shimura-2021}. This o$-$phase has also been reported in epitaxial thin films with a thickness thinner than 20 nm \cite {Lyu2018, o-HfO2-2021, Yun2022}. Regarding the rhombohedral R3m  (r$-$phase), the reported thicknesses are ranged from 5 to 40 nm \cite {Wei2018, Silva2021, Ali2021}. Indeed, for applications, ultrathin films are often advantageous; for example, in the case of nonvolatile memories and ferroelectric field-effect transistors \cite {8423435-Ali, doi:10.1063/1.3636417-Muller}, energy storage \cite{Park-energystorage2014, Silva-energystorage2021}, negative capacitance \cite {Hoffman-negative-c, Hoffman2019}, and tunnel junctions \cite {Wei2019, Goh-2018-tj}.

In terms of NLO properties, the studies on ZrO$_2$-HfO$_2$ materials are scarce, leaving open the question of the potential of these compounds for optical applications. Indeed, to our knowledge, only two experimental studies can be found in the literature \cite {Kondo_2021_1, Kondo_2021_2}. They investigate the EO effect in Y$_2$O$_3$-doped HfO$_2$, reporting an EO coefficient of about 0.67 pm/V for (111)-oriented thin-films, a modest value compared to the ones in LNO and BTO materials. However, the exact EO coefficients of the two experimentally reported ferroelectric phases in HfO$_2$ and ZrO$_2$ are not known yet. Therefore, this study's primary objective is to report and investigate the EO coefficients of  HfO$_2$ and ZrO$_2$ materials.\\

In this work, we study the second-order nonlinear optical (NLO) properties of the orthorhombic Pbc2$_1$ and rhombohedral R3m phases of ZrO$_2$ and HfO$_2$, relying on all-electron density functional theory (DFT) computations to report reliable EO coefficients. The obtained results are compared to the ones computed  for the rhombohedral R3c LiNbO$_3$ (LNO) phase, for which experimental data are available allowing us to use LNO as a reference material. All reported EO coefficients have been determined from the microscopic second-order NLO responses of these systems that, in turn, they have been obtained via a coupled perturbed Kohn-Sham (CPKS) analytical approach developed and implemented in the CRYSTAL17 suite of quantum chemical programs by one of the authors of this study \cite{crystal14-2014, CRYSTAL17}. It has already been established that this perturbative approach delivers high accuracy molecular and bulk electric properties, free from numerical errors \cite{Maschio2012, Maschio2012-IR,  Maschio2013, Maschio2015, Rerat-2016}. To achieve the maximum possible relevance with the available or future experimental data, the reported coefficients comprise electronic, vibrational effects, and piezoelectric contributions, which have also been obtained analytically. Especially for comparison between theory and experiment, such contributions are of essential importance for a reliable prediction of the overall NLO response of a given crystalline or molecular material and the complete understanding of its origin.\\
Our article is organized as follows: First, we give the theoretical background of our study, insisting on the close relationship between the macroscopic NLO susceptibilities and the microscopic hyper-polarizabilities of the unit shells. Then, we study the EO properties of LNO using CRYSTAL code, which will serve as the material of reference. Specifically, we report reliable values of its microscopic second-order responses and analyze  the electronic, vibrational, and piezoelectric contributions. Finally, we report and discuss the Pockels EO coefficients of o$-$ and r$-$phase ZrO$_{2}$ and HfO$_{2}$, comparing them to those calculated for the R3c rhombohedral phase of LNO.

\section{Theoretical framework and computational details} \label{s: methode}
The microscopic linear and non$-$linear optical properties of a finite zero-dimensional system  are defined in terms of a Taylor power series expansion with respect to an external applied electric field  E$_{jkl}$ as
\begin{equation}\label{eq:1}
     \mu_{i} = \mu_{0} + \alpha^{\textit{tot}}_{ij} E_{j}+ \frac{1}{2} \beta^{\textit{tot}}_{ijk} E_{j} E_{k} +  \frac{1}{6} \gamma^{\textit{tot}}_{ijkl} E_{j} E_{k}E_{l}  +...
\end{equation}
Where, \textit{i}, \textit{j}, \textit{k} and l stand for Cartesian coordinates (\textit{x}, \textit{y}, \textit{z}) ,  $\mu_{i}$ and $\mu_{0}$ are the induced and the permanent dipole moment,  $\alpha^{\textit{tot}}_{ij}$ is the total dipole electric polarizability, while $ \beta^{\textit{tot}}_{ijk}$ and  $\gamma^{\textit{tot}}_{ijkl}$ are the total first and second dipole hyperpolarizabilities, respectively. By the term total (\textit{tot}) it is implied that both electronic (\textit{ele}) and vibrational (\textit{vib}) contributions\cite{Bishop1990, Maschio2015, Rerat-2016}  are taken into account, Hence:
\begin{equation}\label{eq:2}
 \alpha^{\textit{tot}}_{ij} =  \alpha^{ele}_{ij} +\alpha^{vib}_{ij}
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}\label{eq:3}
  \beta^{\textit{tot}}_{ijk} = \beta^{ele}_{ijk} + \beta^{vib}_{ijk}
\end{equation}
For three-dimensional periodic crystalline lattices,  equation (\ref{eq:1}) can be written as
\begin{equation}\label{eq:4}
    P_{i} = P_{0} + \chi^{(1)}_{ij} E_{j} +  \chi^{(2)}_{ijk} E_{j}  E_{k} + \chi^{(3)}_{ijkl} E_{j}  E_{k} E_{l}+...
\end{equation}\\
Where $P_{i}$ is the unit-cell induced polarization while   $\chi^{(1)}_{ij}$, $\chi^{(2)}_{ijk}$,  and $\chi^{(3)}_{ijkl}$ stand for the total first order (linear), and the second-and the third-order (nonlinear) optical macroscopic bulk susceptibilities, respectively. The first and second coefficients of equation (\ref{eq:4}) are deduced from the total microscopic (hyper) polarizabilities per unit-cell volume (\textit{V}) as follows (in atomic units):

\begin{equation}\label{eq:5}
 \chi^{(1)}_{ij} =  \frac {4 \pi}{V}\alpha^{\textit{tot}}_{ij}
\end{equation}

\begin{equation}\label{eq:6}
  \chi^{(2)}_{ijk} =   \frac {2 \pi}{V} \beta^{tot}_{ijk}
\end{equation}
The total first-order susceptibility $\chi^{(1)}_{ij}$ can be used to deduce the relative dielectric tensor $\epsilon_{ij}$, which in turn gives access to bulk refractive indices $n$ via the following expressions:

 \begin{equation}\label{eq:7}
 \epsilon_{ij} = \delta_{ij} + \chi^{(1)}_{ij}
 \end{equation}

\begin{equation}\label{eq:8}
 n_{ii} = \epsilon_{ii}^{1/2}
 \end{equation}
In the above equations, $\delta_{ij}$ represents the elements of the identity matrix ($\delta_{ij}=1$ for $i=j$, and $0$ for $i\ne j$). Note that we consider in this work a diagonal $\epsilon_{ij}$ tensor so that the subscript $i$ of $\epsilon_{ii}$ corresponds to one of the three principal axes $n_{ii}$ of the ellipsoidal indicatrix.

Now, to obtain the EO Pockels coefficients ($r_{ijk}$), as a first step, we consider the constant stress (or "clamped") conditions, wherein $\chi^{(2)}_{ijk}$ and the bulk refractive indices $n_{ii}$ given in equation (\ref{eq:8}) can be used to determine one out of the two terms contributing to the total $r_{ijk}$ coefficients. The clamped EO coefficient is denoted here as $r^{S}_{ijk}$, comprises both vibrational and electronic contributions, and is defined  as:
\begin{equation}\label{eq:9}
   r^{S}_{ijk} =  - 2 \,\,\,   \frac {\chi^{(2)}_{ijk}}{n^{2}_{ii} n^{2}_{jj}}
\end{equation}

In the second step, we should model and consider the relevant acoustic contribution stemming from the piezoelectric effect. This effect depends on the frequency of the applied ac electric field, as it originates from the inverse piezoelectric effect, according to which the application of an ac oscillating field induces mechanical deformations on the crystalline lattice. The resulting contribution to the $r_{ijk}$ coefficients, denoted here as $r^{p}_{ijk}$, is defined from  the photoelastic tensor  $P_{ij\mu \nu}$ and converse piezoelectric tensor $d_{k \mu \nu}$ \cite {Ebra2015, Zgonik2002} as:
\begin{equation}\label{eq:10}
  r^{p}_{ijk} =   \sum_{\mu , \nu =1}^{3} P_{ij\mu \nu} d_{k\mu \nu}
\end{equation}
The calculation of the tensorial components of $r^{p}_{ijk}$ is achieved via the computation of the photoelastic constants $\frac {\partial \eta_{ij}}{\partial S_{\mu \nu}}$ ($P_{ij\mu \nu}$) defined as the derivative of
the impermeability tensor $\eta_{ij}$ with respect to strain $S_{\mu \nu}$, which are the elements of the fourth rank photoelastic tensor, and of the converse piezoelectric tensor $\frac {\partial S_{\mu \nu}}{\partial E_{k}}$ ($d_{k\mu \nu}$)  \cite {PRB-Ebra2013}. Finally, the total EO coefficients that we report in this work are calculated as $r_{ijk} =r^{S}_{ijk} + r^{p}_{ijk}$. More detailed information about photoelastic calculations can be found elsewhere\cite {PRB-Ebra2013, Ebra2015, Zgonik2002}. \\

All computations of frequency-dependent properties have been performed with the CRYSTAL suite of programs \cite {CRYSTAL17}. In order to determine the dynamic vibrational  and electronic (clamped nuclei) hyper-polarizabilities, a fully analytical approach relying on the coupled perturbed Hartree-Fock and Kohn-Sham method (CPHF / CPKS) has been applied \cite{Maschio2015, Rerat-2016, Pascale2004, Zicovich2004, Maschio2013}.
In the case of  LNO, we considered three different DFT functionals to investigate the dependence on the DFT method of the properties of interest and to compare the results with available experimental data. That includes the Becke, three-parameter, Lee-Yang–Parr exchange-correlation functional (B3LYP) \cite {Becke1993, Lee1988}, the pure Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof one (PBE) \cite {PBE1996}, and with 25$\%$ Hartree-Fock (HF) exchange (PBE0) \cite {Adamo1999}. In the case of   ZrO$_{2}$ and HfO$_{2}$ (orthorhombic Pbc2$_1$ and rhombohedral R3m phases), only the B3LYP functional has been applied as it gives good results for LNO. The basis sets of LNO are taken from Refs. \cite {PRB-basisset-Nb}, \cite {Oliveira-basisset-Li}, and \cite {PRB-basisset-O} for Nb, Li, and O, respectively. The basis sets for ZrO$_{2}$ are from Refs. \cite {Oliveira-basisset-Li} and \cite {Valenzano2011} for O and Zr, respectively, while those for HfO$_2$ are taken from Refs. \cite{Basisset-O-HfO2} and \cite {PRB-basisset-Hf} for O and Hf, respectively.
\section{Results and discussion} \label{s: discussion}

\begin{figure}[H]
    \centering
     \captionsetup{width=.8\linewidth}
     \hspace*{-0.5in}
    \includegraphics [scale=0.6] {FIG1_Structures.pdf}
    \vspace*{-70mm}
    \caption{The crystallographic structures of a) LiNbO$_3$ (space group R3c), b) rhombohedral ZrO$_2$-HfO$_2$ (space group R3m), and c) orthorhombic ZrO$_2$-HfO$_2$ (space group Pbc2$_1$).}
    \label{fig:1}
\end{figure}

\subsection{LNO rhombohedral R3c} \label{ss:LiNbO3}
We started our calculations with LNO, which features a ferroelectric R3c ground state at low temperatures. The crystal structure of the bulk system, built from ten atoms per unit cell, is shown in Figure \ref{fig:1}a (lattice constants and atomic  coordinates are given in Table S.1 in Supplemental Material (SM) \cite{Ali2022}). Computed  band gaps,  dynamic refractive indices n$_{ii}$ and $\epsilon_{ii}$  values of LNO determined  with three functionals of different types, namely B3LYP, PBE0, and PBE at an optical frequency corresponding to 633 nm wavelength, are listed in  Table \ref{table:1}. Apart from  electronic contributions, which can be trivially computed with the CPKS approach, the reported values comprise as well the respective vibrational contributions computed at the same level of theory. The wavelength (633 nm) was chosen to compare our results to available data reported in the literature; both experimental and theoretical data are reported in Table \ref{table:1}. Note that the EO properties are also investigated up to the near-infrared wavelength range in section \ref{ss:o-ZHO}.

Starting from the computed bandgap of LNO, it is seen that out of the three methods used, B3LYP and PBE0 yield notably larger values as compared to the reported experimental values. On the other hand, the pure PBE functional follows the opposite trend. The frequently cited direct band gap value of LNO, mostly concluded from optical experiments \cite {GapLNO-1990}, is about 3.78 eV. However, this value should be considered with care due to electron-hole attraction effects, which might induce important underestimations in the final outcome of optical measurement, as already discussed in Refs.  \cite {Thierfelde-gap2009, PRB-Nahm2008}. Therefore, for LNO crystal, a band gap of 4.7 eV \cite {Thierfelde-gap2009} should be considered more suitable for comparisons between theory and experiment. Bearing in mind the latter correction, the B3LYP functional and the associated basis set reproduce the band gap of LNO better than PBE.

Turning our attention to the refractive indices computed in this study, we also notice that both B3LYP and PBE0 functionals yield values that fall very close to the available experimental measurements. On the other hand,  pure PBE overshoots the experimental reference values, yielding values close to the earlier Local-Density approximations (LDA) reported results. This behavior is not surprising since pure DFT functionals generally underestimate the gap returning overestimated cell polarizabilities $\alpha_{ij}$ \cite {Bishop1990} and  dielectric constants. Hence, it is  expected to affect the refractive indices (equation \ref {eq:8}). Nonetheless, despite the apparent deviations in functional performance, all methods considered predict relatively stable birefringence values (denoted $ \delta n$ in Table \ref{table:1}), in good agreement with the available experimental measurements conducted on stoichiometric LNO crystals (cationic ratio Li/Nb $\sim$ 1) \cite{Schlarb1993, Bergman1968}.

\begin{table} [H]
    \centering
    \captionsetup{width=.8\linewidth}
     \caption{Band gap, refractive indices $n_{ii}$, the birefringence $ \delta n$, and dielectric constants $\epsilon_{ii}$ of LNO  calculated at 633 nm wavelength using different functionals and compared to experimental results. Values in parentheses correspond to the static values (at "infinite" wavelength).}
\begin{tabular}{  c c c c c c c c}
\hline
&B3LYP & PBE0&  PBE&LDA \cite {PRBVeithen2004}& exp \cite{Schlarb1993} &   exp \cite{ Nelson1974}\\ [1ex]
\hline\hline
Gap (eV) &4.75& 5.29& 3.15& -&   3.78  &-\\[0.5ex]
n$_{xx}$ (n$_{o}$) &2.257&2.227 &2.497& 2.37 & 2.28 & 2.286\\[0.5ex]
n$_{zz}$ (n$_{e}$)& 2.149&2.120& 2.402& 2.35 &  2.18& 2.202\\[0.5ex]
$ \delta n$& 0.107& 0.107&  0.095&/ &  0.098& 0.09\\[0.5ex]
$\epsilon_{xx}$ &5.10 (4.71) & 4.96& 6.23 &/ &   / &/\\[0.5ex]
$\epsilon_{zz}$ &4.63 (4.31)& 4.50& 5.77& / &   /  &/\\[0.5ex]
  \hline
\end{tabular}
 \label{table:1}
\end{table}

The clamped EO coefficients  r$^{S}_{ijk}$ of LNO, together with the corresponding electronic and vibrational contributions computed with the B3LYP functional, are listed in Table \ref{table:2}. We also list previous  published experimental measurements and theoretical data in the same table. All properties have been deducted from computed $\chi^{(2)}_{ijk}(-\omega_{\sigma}; \omega, 0)$ (for Pockels coefficient calculation, $\omega$ stands for a laser wavelength, $\omega = 0$ for a static electric field, and  $\omega_{\sigma}$ is the sum of two wavelengths, see  SM for more details \cite{Ali2022}) obtained at the same level of theory, considering only the four EO independent tensorial components of LNO  r$_{33}$, r$_{13}$, r$_{11}$, and r$_{51}$ \cite {PRBVeithen2004}. The vibrational contribution is a result of the transverse optical phonon modes; they can be represented as $4A_1+ 5A_2 + 9 E$, where the $A_1$ and $E$ modes are Raman and infrared (IR) active; in contrast, $A_2$ modes are silent. The $A_1$ modes are coupled to r$_{33}$ and r$_{13}$, while the $E$ modes are linked to r$_{11}$ and r$_{51}$. The corresponding computed phonon frequencies, showing a good agreement with available experimental data, together with the second-order nonlinear susceptibilities $\chi^{(2)}_{ijk}(-\omega_{\sigma}; \omega,0)$ at a wavelength of 633 nm, are given in SM \cite{Ali2022}. Looking at the computed clamped EO coefficients presented in Table \ref{table:2}, the results obtained with B3LYP functional are in very good agreement with experimental results, notably for r$_{33}$ and r$_{13}$ coefficients. On the other hand, an overestimation of r$_{11}$ and an underestimation of r$_{51}$, respectively, are revealed. Nevertheless, our calculations expose that the  most dominant contribution out of the two considered for r$^{S}_{ijk}$ is the vibrational contribution to the microscopic second hyperpolarizability of the unit cell. This result, relying on a hybrid DFT treatment of the wavefunction, confirms previous computations within the LDA approximation \cite {PRBVeithen2004}, producing at the same time a very good estimation of the EO tensorial components with respect to the experimental data.

\begin{table} [H]
    \centering
    \captionsetup{width=.8\linewidth}
     \caption{ $r_{ijk}(-\omega_{\sigma}; \omega, 0)$ EO tensor (pm/V) of LNO at 633 nm wavelength: electronic and ionic (clamped), and piezoelectric (unclamped) contributions, together with results from previous calculations and experiments.}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c}
\hline
\multirow{2}{1.5cm} &  &\multicolumn{3}{p{3cm}}{\centering B3LYP}  &  \multicolumn{1}{p{1.6cm}}{\centering LDA \cite {PRBVeithen2004}} &   \multicolumn{1}{p{1.5cm}}{\centering exp \cite{Turner1966}} &  \multicolumn{1}{p{1.5cm}}{\centering exp \cite {K.K.WONG2002}}\\ [1ex]
\hline
Clamped & & $r^{ele}_{ijk}$& $r^{vib}_{ijk}$& $r^{S}_{ijk}$&\\ [1ex]
 &r$_{33}$ &    7.19& 23.45 &30.64& 26.9   & 30.8  &34\\
&r$_{13}$ &   2.74 & 7.94& 10.68  &9.7& 8.6 &10.9\\
&r$_{11}$ & -1.02 &    -6.84 & -7.86& 4.6  & 3.4 &/\\
&r$_{51}$ & 3.08&    19.43 & 22.51& 14.9 &  28&/\\
\\
Unclamped & &$r^{p}_{ijk}$ &  &  $r_{ijk}$ &  & &exp \cite{Abdi1998}\\[1ex]
& r$_{33}$ & 0.95 &     &31.59&  27   &32.6 & /\\
&r$_{13}$ & 1.42 &   &12.1&  10.5  &10& /\\
&r$_{11}$ & 0.86 &   & -7.00&   7.5  &6& 9.9\\
&r$_{51}$ & 10.77 &   & 33.28&  28.6& 32.2& /\\
\hline  \hline
\end{tabular}
\label{table:2}
\end{table}

We now consider the total unclamped EO coefficients $r_{ijk}$ of LNO, including the piezoelectric contribution, which is computed at the same level of theory as discussed above. We note that the photoelastic constants $P_{ij\mu \nu}$, here computed at 633 nm, are found relatively independent on wavelength above 633 nm (see Figure S.2 in SM \cite{Ali2022}). The same trend has been observed for MgO and CaWO$_4$ crystals from calculations at the PBE level \cite{PRB-Ebra2013, Ebra2015}. The piezoelectric contribution to the EO coefficients is listed in Table \ref{table:2} as $r^{P}_{ijk}$. Looking at the total $r_{ijk} =r^{S}_{ijk} + r^{p}_{ijk}$, an excellent agreement with experimental results is obtained. For the three coefficients r$_{33}$, r$_{13}$, and r$_{11}$, the vibrational contribution is still dominant, while r$_{51}$ coefficient has the highest piezoelectric contribution (Table \ref{table:2}). Three functionals, B3LYP (Table \ref{table:2}), PBE0, and PBE (Table S.5), give a piezoelectric contribution to r$_{51}$ of around 11 pm/V, that represents around 33 $\%$ of  r$_{51}$ unclamped value, lower than the 48 $\%$ found in Ref.\cite {PRBVeithen2004}. Nevertheless, the r$_{51}$ EO coefficient is found with the highest piezoelectric contribution from the four independent EO coefficients of LNO material, in line with the previous theoretical results \cite {PRBVeithen2004}. Experimentally, only a piezoelectric contribution of about 4.2 pm/V has been reported \cite{Turner1966}. This disagreement might be due to the experimental method, which can not suppress the total piezoelectric contribution during the measurement of the clamped coefficient, as previously suggested in Ref.\cite {PRBVeithen2004}.

It is worth noting that the PBE0 functional showed an overestimation of the piezoelectric contribution to r$_{33}$ ($\sim$6 pm/V see Table S.5), which is higher than the value obtained with B3LYP and PBE functionals ($\sim$1 pm/V close to the 1.8 pm/V found experimentally  \cite{Turner1966}). Moreover, pure PBE functional delivers a reasonable estimation of the EO coefficients (Table S.5), even though it underestimates the gap, thus, giving a high refractive index (Table \ref{table:1}) as discussed above. That is because underestimated gaps lead to overestimated susceptibility $\chi^{(2)}_{ijk}$; in return, this will compensate for the high values of the refractive indices when computing the EO coefficients r$^{S}_{ijk}$ (see equation \ref {eq:5}).

\subsection{ZrO$_{2}$-HfO$_{2}$ orthorhombic Pbc2$_{1}$} \label{ss:o-ZHO}
In this section, we present electro-optics properties of the o$-$phase of ZrO$_{2}$ and HfO$_{2}$ compounds, with space group Pbc2$_{1}$ (No. 29). The optimization of Pbc2$_{1}$ ZrO$_{2}$ and HfO$_{2}$ is performed using 12 atoms in a unit cell. The optimized crystalline structure and atomic positions are given in SM \cite {Ali2022}. The polarization was also computed for o$-$phase ZrO$_{2}$ and HfO$_{2}$ via Berry phase calculation using Quantum Espresso (QE) \cite {Giannozzi2009}, in order to verify that the optimized polar phases are consistent with the ones reported in literature \cite {Boscke2011, Materlik2015}. Table \ref {table:3} displays the band gap, refractive indices, and remanent polarization of o$-$phase ZrO$_{2}$ and HfO$_{2}$; Note that regarding optical properties, no experimental data are available for comparison. However, we did obtain polarization values similar to previous calculations \cite {Materlik2015}.\\
It is well known that ZrO$_{2}$ and HfO$_{2}$ compounds have a wide band gap, as they are used for high-k applications. From Table \ref {table:3} it can be seen that the band gap of o-HfO$_2$ is higher by about 1 eV compared to o-ZrO$_2$. Another feature is that the refractive indices at 633 nm of o-ZrO$_{2}$ are higher than the ones of o-HfO$_{2}$. This is interesting because a high refractive index is an essential element for silicon photonics applications in order to ensure a sufficient contrast with the refractive index of SiO$_2$ \cite {Messner2019}.
\begin{table} [H]
    \centering
    \captionsetup{width=.6\linewidth}
     \caption{ Band gap and refractive indices of  orthorhombic Pbc2$_1$  ZrO$_{2}$ and HfO$_{2}$  at 633 nm. The polarization P$_b$ (along the b axis) from Berry phase calculation is also shown.}
\begin{tabular}{c c c}
 \hline
   & o-ZrO$_{2}$ & o-HfO$_{2}$\\ [1ex]
 \hline\hline
 gap (eV)&5.40& 6.45\\  [1ex]
 n$_{xx}$ & 2.204& 2.059 \\
 n$_{yy}$ & 2.301  & 2.122 \\
 n$_{zz}$ & 2.236 & 2.081  \\  [1ex]
 P$_b$ ($\mu$C/cm$^{2})$ & 54 (58, \cite {Materlik2015} ) &49.5 (50, \cite {Materlik2015} ) \\
 \hline  \hline
\end{tabular}
 \label{table:3}
\end{table}
We also have to consider the vibrational modes of the Pbc2$_{1}$ phase, as these modes are directly linked and contribute to the EO coefficients. The primitive unit cell of Pbc2$_{1}$ phase with 12 atoms (4 formula units) results in 36 vibrational modes, 3 for translation modes, and 33 optical modes, having the following irreducible representation at the zone center $ \Gamma$: \\
\begin{equation}\label{eq:11}
 \Gamma = 8 A_{1} + 9 A_{2} + 8 B_{1} + 8 B_{2}
\end{equation}
The  $A_{1}$, $B_{1}$, and $B_{2}$ modes are Raman and IR active. Hence, they will contribute to the electro-optic coefficients, while $A_2$ modes are only Raman active. The calculated $A_1$ phonon frequencies are given in Table \ref{table:4}, and the $A_{2}$, $B_{1}$, and $B_{2}$ phonon frequencies are given in SM \cite {Ali2022}. Only a few experimental results concerning the phonon frequencies of Pbc2$_{1}$ o$-$phase are available for pure ZrO$_2$ and HfO$_2$. They are displayed for o-ZrO$_2$ in Table \ref{table:4}, showing a good agreement with the calculated phonon modes.\\
\begin{table}[H]
    \centering
    \captionsetup{width=.7\linewidth}
     \caption{Calculated frequencies ($cm^{-1}$) of Raman and IR active $A_1$ phonon modes of ferroelectric ZrO$_{2}$ and HfO$_{2}$ using B3LYP functional.}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c}
\hline
\multirow{2}{1.5cm} &  \multicolumn{2}{p{2.5cm}}{\centering o-ZrO$_2$}  &  \multicolumn{1}{p{1.5cm}}{\centering o-HfO$_2$} &   \multicolumn{1}{p{1.5cm}}{\centering r-ZrO$_2$} &  \multicolumn{1}{p{1.5cm}}{\centering r-HfO$_2$}\\   [1ex]
  & \multicolumn{1}{c}{} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{exp \cite {Uwe-2022-Raman}}  & \multicolumn{1}{c}{} &   \multicolumn{1}{c}{}  & \multicolumn{1}{c}{}  \\   [1ex]
A$_1$ & 102 &   /& 113 &171 &118\\
 & 186 &200& 153&  220&171\\
 & 291 &  /& 253 &267&267\\
 & 315& 320& 295&352&284\\
 & 351& 340& 329& 449&423\\
 &387&/ &369&534&537\\
 &445&/&451&674&692\\
 &566& 580&589&755&770\\
\hline  \hline
\end{tabular}
\label{table:4}
\end{table}
The orthorhombic Pbc2$_{1}$ with a 2mm point group has five independent EO coefficients \cite {modernphotonics}: r$_{13}$, r$_{23}$, r$_{33}$, r$_{42}$, and r$_{51}$.  Moreover, as given above, only  $A_{1}$, $B_{1}$, and $B_{2}$ contribute to the EO coefficients in the Pbc2$_1$ phase. The $A_{1}$ modes are linked to r$_{13}$, r$_{23}$, and r$_{33}$, the $B_{1}$ and $B_{2}$ modes are coupled to r$_{42}$ and r$_{51}$, respectively. These five EO coefficients are computed at the same level of theory as discussed for LNO, and they are listed in Table \ref {table:5} showing the three different contributions, electronic r$^{ele}_{ijk}$, vibrational r$^{vib}_{ijk}$, and piezoelectric r$^{p}_{ijk}$. The first significant result is that the  EO coefficients in o-ZrO$_{2}$ are higher and almost twice the ones in o-HfO$_{2}$. The r$_{13}$  and r$_{33}$ coefficients have the highest values of the five independent EO elements. For both ZrO$_{2}$ and HfO$_{2}$, these two coefficients have an opposite sign and are quite close in absolute values. Comparing the calculated EO results of o-ZrO$_2$ to those of the reference LNO material (Table \ref {table:2}), the r$_{13}$ of o-ZrO$_{2}$ is close to the r$_{13}$  of LNO, while the r$_{33}$ of o-ZrO$_{2}$ is around one-third  of LNO. Unfortunately, no experiment results are available for pure o-ZrO$_{2}$ and o-HfO$_{2}$. However, for Y$_{2}$O$_{3}$-doped HfO$_{2}$ o$-$phase, EO coefficients have been reported with effective values of about 0.46 pm/V and 0.67 pm/V for (100) and (111) oriented thin films, respectively \cite {Kondo_2021_1, Kondo_2021_2}.

From Table \ref{table:5}, we also deduce that ionic is the dominant contribution to the EO coefficients in o$-$phase ZrO$_2$ and HfO$_2$, as in LNO. The approach used here for EO calculations also provides further insights into this ionic contribution computed by evaluating the Raman and IR intensities \cite{Rerat-2016}, as described in refs.  \cite{Maschio2013} and \cite{Maschio2012}, respectively. In the case of LNO crystal, we found that the two $A_1$ and $E$ polar modes of lowest frequency contribute the most to r$_{33}$ and r$_{51}$, respectively, amounting to 43$\%$ and 36$\%$ of the value of these coefficients. This observation is in good agreement with previous calculations \cite {PRBVeithen2004}, and with the fact that for LNO, unstable phonon modes in the paraelectric phase transform into lower frequency and highly polar modes in the low-temperature ferroelectric phase \cite {PRBVeithen2004}. Nevertheless, ZrO$_2$ and HfO$_2$ materials have numerous polymorphs \cite{Kisi1998} and other mechanisms that can stabilize the ferroelectric phase \cite{Materlik2015, Kisi}, away from the classical paraelectric-ferroelectric phase transition picture. However, looking at the lowest phonon modes in o-ZrO$_2$, the same trend is observed as in LNO material. For example, the lowest frequency $A_1$ TO (transverse optical) mode at 102 $cm^{-1}$ (Table \ref{table:4}) is responsible for about 40$\%$ and more than 60$\%$ of the values of r$_{33}$ and r$_{13}$ in o-ZrO$_2$, respectively.
\begin{table}[H]
    \centering
    \captionsetup{width=.8\linewidth}
     \caption{The five independent elements of $r_{ijk}(-\omega_{\sigma}; \omega, 0)$ tensor for Pbc2$_{1}$ space group, together with their respective electronic, vibrational and piezoelectric contributions, computed at a wavelength of 633 nm. All values are given in pm/V.}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c}
\hline
\multirow{5}{1.5cm} &  & \multicolumn{5}{p{2.5cm}}{\centering o-ZrO$_2$}  &  \multicolumn{2}{p{2.5cm}}{\centering o-HfO$_2$} \\   [1ex]
  & \multicolumn{1}{c}{r$^{ele}_{ijk}$ } & \multicolumn{1}{c}{r$^{vib}_{ijk}$ } & \multicolumn{1}{c}{r$^{p}_{ijk}$ } & \multicolumn{1}{c}{r$_{ijk}$} & & \multicolumn{1}{c}{r$^{ele}_{ijk}$ } & \multicolumn{1}{c}{r$^{vib}_{ijk}$ } & \multicolumn{1}{c}{r$^{p}_{ijk}$ } & \multicolumn{1}{c}{r$_{ijk}$}\\   [1ex]
 r$_{33}$ & 2.10 &   8.75& 0.5 & 11.35& & 1.52 & 5.56  &0.14&7.22 \\
r$_{13}$ & -1.49 &- 9.29&   -1.38 &-12.17 & & -0.81 &  -6.32 & -0.83&-7.96\\
r$_{23}$ & -0.51 &  -2.19&0 & -2.70& & -0.51 &  -1.94 & 0&-2.58 \\
r$_{42}$ &- 0.53 &  -0.95& 0& -1.48& & -0.54 & -0.83 &   0&  -1.37\\
r$_{51}$ & -1.00 &  -1.16& 0& -2.16& & -0.83 &-0.94&  0&  -1.77\\
\hline  \hline
\end{tabular}
\label{table:5}
\end{table}
\textit{Wavelength dependence of EO coefficients}: The EO values reported above are computed at 633 nm, while, for example, wavelengths for telecom applications are in the near-infrared region, typically around 1500 nm. Therefore, with a focus on the influence of laser wavelength on Pockels coefficients, the same calculations as performed at 633 nm were repeated at different wavelengths up to near-infrared. The results are displayed in Figure \ref {fig:2} for the unclamped r$_{33}$ and r$_{13}$ coefficients of LNO and o-ZrO$_2$. ZrO$_2$ is here chosen instead of HfO$_2$ because of its higher EO coefficients compared to HfO$_2$ (Table \ref{table:5}).
\begin{figure} [H]
    \centering
    \captionsetup{width=.6\linewidth}
     \hspace*{-0.5in}
    \includegraphics [scale=0.6]{FIG2_r_EO_wavelength.pdf}
    \vspace*{-30mm}
    \caption{EO coefficients (unclamped) r$_{33}$ and r$_{13}$ of LNO and o-ZrO$_2$ at different wavelengths using B3LYP functional.}
    \label{fig:2}
\end{figure}
First, bearing in mind that the three contributions depend on wavelength, the electronic part is more sensitive to the electric field than the vibrational and piezoelectric contributions. Also, the electronic part depends strongly on the gap of the materials. Therefore, approaching the IR wavelengths, the electronic contribution decreases and converges to a static value \cite {Maschio2015, Rerat-2016}. This decrease is associated with a decrease in the refractive indices: At a wavelength of 1550 nm, the refractive index n$_{zz}$ is found to be 2.08 (2.19) for LNO (for ZrO$_{2}$), which is lower than the value obtained at 633 nm (Tables \ref{table:1} and \ref{table:3}). We found that the vibrational contribution remains almost constant from 633 nm to 1550 nm. The last contribution is piezoelectric, where the dependency on wavelength comes from the photoelastic coefficients, which remain relatively constant at high wavelengths (see Figure S1 in SM \cite{Ali2022}). The general relative increase of the total EO coefficients observed in Figure \ref {fig:2} when increasing the wavelength is thus due to the decrease of the refractive indices (see equation \ref{eq:9}). The EO coefficients of o-ZrO$_2$ are found lower than the ones of LNO at all investigated wavelengths. Nevertheless, in terms of applications, other parameters should be taken into consideration, such as the refractive index and the total dielectric constant, to define a figure of merit ($n^{3}$  r$_{ijk}$/ $\epsilon$ \cite{Epitaxialferroelectricoxide}, with $\epsilon$ a total dielectric constant comprising both the electronic and the ionic contributions) that could bring o$-$phase ZrO$_2$/HfO$_2$ as a competitive material for EO applications. Figure \ref{fig:3} displays the comparison of this figure of merit between LNO, HfO$_2$ and ZrO$_2$ materials. For r$_{33}$ coefficient, LNO has the highest figure of merit; however, the ones for ZrO$_2$ and HfO$_2$ are not negligible. Considering the compatibility of ZrO$_2$ and HfO$_2$  with silicon, these results are significant enough for further investigating different paths to increase the EO coefficients in these materials.
\begin{figure} [H]
    \centering
     \captionsetup{width=.5\linewidth}
     \hspace*{-0.2in}
    \includegraphics [scale=0.5]{FIG3_Figmerit.pdf}
     \vspace*{-22mm}
    \caption{Figure of merit ($n^{3}$  r$_{ijk}$/ $\epsilon$) of HfO$_2$ and ZrO$_2$ compared to LNO using  r$_{33}$ and r$_{13}$ coefficients.}
    \label{fig:3}
\end{figure}
\subsection{ZrO$_{2}$-HfO$_{2}$ rhombohedral R3m} \label{ss:r-ZHO}
In this section, we focus on the EO properties of the rhombohedral R3m (space group No. 160) phase of ZrO$_{2}$-HfO$_{2}$. This phase is less studied than the orthorhombic phase and has only been reported in compressively strained epitaxial thin films \cite {Wei2018, Ali2021}. For the EO investigation,  we also used a unit cell of 12 atoms (4 formula units). One should note that in the case of the r$-$phase, an instability (with negative/imaginary frequency) of TO $A_{1}$-TO$_{1}$ phonon mode was observed when the phonon was computed at the optimized unit cell volume for r-ZrO$_{2}$ (141 $\AA^{3}$) and r-HfO$_{2}$ (136 $\AA^{3}$), the optimized unit cells being given in SM \cite{Ali2022}. For the calculation of EO coefficients and other properties to be reliable, one should have only real frequencies. To achieve such a condition for ZrO$_{2}$, an experimental volume ($\sim$132 $\AA^{3}$) was imposed together with a rhombohedral angle equal to 89.56° \cite {Ali2021}, forcing the imaginary phonon mode that is calculated at 82\textit{i} $cm^{-1}$ to move to 76 $cm^{-1}$ at the experimental volume. While for HfO$_{2}$, no r$-$phase unit cell volume was experimentally reported, the volume was reduced until achieving a positive phonon frequency, and the volume used here is 128 $\AA^{3}$.
\begin{table} [H]
    \centering
    \captionsetup{width=.6\linewidth}
     \caption{ Band gap and refractive indices of  rhombohedral R3m  ZrO$_{2}$ and HfO$_{2}$  at 633 nm. The rhombohedral polarization P$_r$ from Berry phase calculation is also shown.}
\begin{tabular}{c c c}
 \hline
   & r-ZrO$_{2}$ & r-HfO$_{2}$\\ [1ex]
 \hline\hline
 gap (eV) &5.79& 6.77\\  [1ex]
 n$_{xx}$ & 2.282& 2.114 \\
 n$_{zz}$ & 2.271& 2.107  \\
 $\delta n$ & 0.011&0.007  \\  [1ex]
 P$_{r}$ ($\mu$C/cm$^{2})$ & 6.8 & 5.1 \\
 \hline  \hline
\end{tabular}
 \label{table:6}
\end{table}
The computed band gap, refractive indices, and polarization are displayed in Table \ref {table:6}. The band gaps obtained for ZrO$_2$ and HfO$_2$ in the r$-$phase are significantly higher than in the o$-$phase. The remanent polarization for the r$-$phase was also computed via Berry Phase using QE. The value obtained for the polarization is lower than in the case of the o$-$phase, as expected from previous calculations \cite {Wei2018, Silva2021}. Note that this polarization depends strongly on the compressive strain, which is directly related to the rhombohedral angle \cite{Wei2018, Ali2021}. Here, the polarization is computed at a fixed angle using the rhombohedral primitive unit cell. In contrast, in Refs.\cite {Wei2018, Silva2021} the polarization is computed with hexagonal unit cells and at different compressive strains.
\begin{table}[H]
    \centering
    \captionsetup{width=.8\linewidth}
     \caption{The four independent elements  of $r_{ijk}(-\omega_{\sigma}; \omega, 0)$ tensor for R3m space group, together with their respective electronic, vibrational and piezoelectric contributions, computed at a wavelength of 633 nm. All values are given in pm/V.}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c}
\hline
\multirow{5}{1.5cm} &  & \multicolumn{5}{p{2.5cm}}{\centering r-ZrO$_2$}  &  \multicolumn{2}{p{2.5cm}}{\centering r-HfO$_2$} \\   [1ex]
  & \multicolumn{1}{c}{r$^{ele}_{ijk}$ } & \multicolumn{1}{c}{r$^{vib}_{ijk}$ } & \multicolumn{1}{c}{r$^{p}_{ijk}$ } & \multicolumn{1}{c}{r$_{ijk}$} & & \multicolumn{1}{c}{r$^{ele}_{ijk}$ } & \multicolumn{1}{c}{r$^{vib}_{ijk}$ } & \multicolumn{1}{c}{r$^{p}_{ijk}$ } & \multicolumn{1}{c}{r$_{ijk}$}\\   [1ex]
 r$_{33}$ &- 0.11 &  - 0.30 & -0.01 & -0.42& & -0.07 & -0.21  &-0.02&-0.30 \\
 r$_{13}$ & 0.05 & 0.14& 0.05 & 0.24& & 0.03 &0.13&0.11 &  0.27\\
r$_{11}$ & -0.06 &  -0.21&  -0.20& -0.28& & -0.05 &  -0.08 & -0.16& 0.29 \\
r$_{51}$ &0.05 &0.08&  -0.25  &-0.12 & & 0.03 & 0.21  &-0.19 & 0.05\\
\hline  \hline
\end{tabular}
\label{table:7}
\end{table}
As seen for o$-$phase (section \ref{ss:o-ZHO}), a unit cell with 12 atoms results in 36 vibrational modes, 3 for translation modes, and 33 for optical phonon modes. In the case of R3m space group, there are three different modes $A_{1}$, $A_{2}$, and $E$; the irreducible representation at $\Gamma$ zone center  is:
\begin{equation}\label{eq:12}
 \Gamma = 8 A_{1} + 3 A_{2} + 11  E
\end{equation}
The $A_{1}$ and (degenerate) $E$ modes are simultaneously Raman and IR active, while the A$_{2}$ modes are Raman active and IR inactive. The calculated $A_{1}$ mode frequencies are shown in Table \ref{table:4} for ZrO$_2$ and HfO$_2$, experimentally no data are available for ZrO$_2$-HfO$_2$ in r$-$phase. The $E$ and $A_{2}$ phonon frequencies are given in SM (Table S.8 in SM \cite{Ali2022})\\
Following the same method as described in sections \ref {ss:LiNbO3} and \ref {ss:o-ZHO}, the EO coefficients obtained for ZrO$_{2}$ and HfO$_{2}$ r$-$phase are given in Table \ref {table:7}. Comparing these EO coefficients to the ones of LNO and  o$-$phase, r$-$phase shows very modest EO values. This trend is also observed in terms of remanent polarization obtained for r$-$phase compared to orthorhombic Pbc2$_{1}$ (Tables \ref{table:3} and \ref{table:6}).

\begin{figure} [H]
    \centering
     \captionsetup{width=.5\linewidth}
     \hspace*{-0.2in}
    \includegraphics [scale=0.5]{FIG4_r_EO_angle.pdf}
     \vspace*{-12mm}
    \caption{r$_{33}$ EO coefficient of r- ZrO$_2$  computed at different angles.}
    \label{fig:4}
\end{figure}
\textit{Strain dependence of EO coefficients}: Because the ZrO$_2$-HfO$_2$ R3m phase has a strong dependence on the compressive strain, r$_{33}$ EO coefficient of r-ZrO$_2$ is computed at different rhombohedral angles. The results are displayed in Figure \ref {fig:4}, showing a linear dependence of r$_{33}$ with respect to the rhombohedral angle. Even at a high compressive strain (rhombohedral angle of 88°), the EO coefficient is still lower than the one calculated for o-ZrO$_2$. Two main reasons cause the low EO coefficients of r-ZrO$_2$ compared to o-ZrO$_2$. First is the relatively high band gap in the r$-$phase, which reduces the electronic contribution. The second reason is that the $A_1$ low-frequency phonon modes have negligible contributions to EO coefficients in the r$-$phase, while similar modes highly contribute to the ones of the o$-$phase (see section \ref{ss:o-ZHO}). In more details, for the r$-$phase, from 8 $A_1$ active modes (Table \ref {table:4}), only 3 modes at 220, 352, and 449 $cm^{-1}$ contribute significantly to r$_{33}$ and  r$_{13}$. The modes at 220 and 352 $cm^{-1}$ give almost the same value of the hyper-polarizabilities $\beta_{33}$ (equation \ref{eq:6}), but with opposite signs, hence they cancel each other, therefore solely the mode at 449 $cm^{-1}$ is contributing to r$_{33}$. This is the most probable reason why the r$-$phase shows a lower EO coefficient than the o$-$phase. Finally, this gives r$-$phase a very low figure of merit compared to o$-$phase and to LNO as illustrated in Figure \ref{fig:3}.

\section {Conclusion}
In conclusion, we investigated the electro-optic Pockels coefficients of the ZrO$_2$ and HfO$_2$ compounds in two noncentrosymmetric phases: rhombohedral R3m and orthorhombic Pbc2$_{1}$. We determined that the o$-$phase has considerably higher EO coefficients than the r$-$phase. This remains true for a highly strained rhombohedral phase; the optical nonlinearity is weak compared to the o$-$phase. Moreover, r$_{33}$ and r$_{13}$ in the orthorhombic phase are higher in ZrO$_2$ than in HfO$_2$, with values of about 12 and 7 pm/V  for ZrO$_2$ and HfO$_2$, respectively. Comparing the EO coefficients of o-ZrO$_2$ to rhombohedral LiNbO$_3$ reference material, the r$_{13}$ coefficient shows a comparable value to the r$_{13}$ of LiNbO$_3$. In contrast, the r$_{33}$ coefficient of o-ZrO$_2$ is three times lower than the r$_{33}$ of LiNbO$_3$. We observed that the polar and low-frequency phonon modes contribute most to the EO in the orthorhombic phase; the same trend is also observed in LiNbO$_3$. Our numerical results suggest that the ferroelectric orthorhombic phase of ZrO$_2$ and HfO$_2$-based thin films can be relevant for EO applications when considering their compatibility with silicon. Finally, considering the dominant contribution by the ionic part as identified in this work, we believe that doping ZrO$_2$/HfO$_2$ with a suitable element to stabilize the orthorhombic phase but also increase the ionicity  of these materials will lead to high EO coefficients. Thus, ZrO$_2$/HfO$_2$-based compounds may be promising candidates for EO properties and their use in photonic devices.
\\
\\
\textbf{Acknowledgements:} This work has received support from the Agence nationale de la recherche (ANR) under project FOIST (N°ANR-18-CE24-0030), and from the French national network RENATECH for nanofabrication.

\medskip
\pagebreak

\setcounter{secnumdepth}{0}
\section{SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL}
\setcounter{equation}{0}
\setcounter{table}{0}
\setcounter{figure}{0}
\section{EO coefficients of LiNbO$_3$ and ZrO$_2$-HfO$_2$ materials} \label{s:1}

The electro-optic (EO) coefficients for 3m  space group (SG) \cite {modernphotonics}, thus for ZrO$_{2}$-HfO$_{2}$  rhombohedral R3m (SG N° 160) and LiNbO$_{3}$  R3c (SG N° 161), have 4 independent EO coefficients with two possible representation:
\begin{align}\label{eq:13}
 m\perp x_{1}\begin{vmatrix}
r_{11} & 0 & r_{13} \\
-r_{11} & 0 & r_{13} \\
0 & 0 & r_{33} \\
0 & r_{51} & 0 \\
r_{51} & 0 & 0 \\
0 &- r_{11} & 0 \\
\end{vmatrix} & &
&or& m\perp x_{2}\begin{vmatrix}
0 & -r_{22} & r_{13} \\
0 & r_{22} & r_{13} \\
0 & 0 & r_{33} \\
0 & r_{51} & 0 \\
r_{51} & 0 & 0 \\
-r_{22} & 0 & 0 \\
\end{vmatrix}
\end{align}
In the case of Pbc2$_1$ (SG N° 29 and 2mm point group), there are five independent electro-optic coefficients:
\begin{align}\label{eq:14}
\begin{vmatrix}
0 & 0 & r_{13} \\
0 & 0 & r_{23} \\
0 & 0 & r_{33} \\
0 & r_{42} & 0 \\
r_{51} & 0 & 0 \\
0 &0 & 0 \\
\end{vmatrix}
\end{align}
\section{ Symmetry of $\beta$ (SHG) and $\beta$ (EO / dc-Pockels)  }
In the general case, the second order non-linearity $\beta_{ijk}$ is written as
\begin{equation}\label{eq:15}
\beta_{ijk}  =  \beta_{ijk} (-\omega_{\sigma}; \omega_{1}, \omega_{2})
\end{equation}
\textbf {Second harmonic generation (SHG)}\\
For SHG,  $\beta_{ijk}$  ($\omega_{\sigma}$ = 2 $\omega$ and  $\omega_{1}$ = $\omega_{2}$ = $\omega $ )     can be written as
\begin{equation}\label{eq:16}
  \beta_{ijk} = \beta_{ijk} (-2\omega; \omega, \omega)
\end{equation}
So in the case of second harmonic generation, for example with $\beta_{yxy}$ equal to $\beta_{yyx}$, in general the symmetry given in (\ref{eq:16}) can simply be written as $\beta_{ijk} (-2\omega; \omega, \omega) =\beta_{ikj} (-2\omega; \omega, \omega) $.\\
\\
\textbf{EO / dc-Pockels effect}\\
For dc-Pockels effect, $\beta_{ijk}$  ($\omega_{\sigma}$ =  $\omega$ , $\omega_{1}$ = $\omega$, and   $\omega_{2}$ = 0) is written as
\begin{equation}\label{eq:17}
  \beta_{ijk} = \beta_{ijk} (-\omega; \omega, 0)    =   \beta_{ikj} (-\omega; 0, \omega)
\end{equation}
The same permutation as given above for SHG then leads to $\beta_{xxz}$ (-$\omega$; $\omega$,0) =  $\beta_{xzx}$(-$\omega$; 0, $\omega$). In other words, $\beta_{xxz}$ (-$\omega$; $\omega$,0) tensor element, where the static field is along z, is equal to  $\beta_{xzx}$(-$\omega$; 0, $\omega$), so that the static electric field is always applied along z direction. But  $\beta_{xxz}$ (-$\omega$; $\omega$,0) is not equal to  $\beta_{xzx}$ (-$\omega$; $\omega$, 0) because in the  latter tensor element the static electric field is along x. Finally, this will ensure that $r_{ijk}$ coefficients respect the permutation   $r_{ijk}  = r_{jik}$.

\section{Results} \label{s:5 }
\textbf { LiNbO$_{3}$}\\
\begin{table} [H]
\centering
\parbox{0.4\textwidth}{
\begin{footnotesize}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c}
 \hline
  LiNbO$_{3}$ & a (\AA) &b  (\AA) &c  (\AA)\\
       &  5.216&5.216&14.14\\
 \hline\hline
Atom & x/a& y/b& z/c \\  [1ex]
 Li & 0& 0&0.2614 \\
Nb & 0& 0& -0.0188 \\  [1ex]
 O& -0.0473& 0.3435&0.0441\\ [1ex]
 \hline
 V ($\AA^{3}$) &111 \\
   \hline  \hline
\end{tabular}
\end{footnotesize}
\caption{The optimized geometry for LiNbO$_{3}$, on the right the LiNbO$_{3}$ R3c structure.}
\label{table:8}
}
\qquad
\begin{minipage}[c]{0.4\textwidth}%
\centering
    \includegraphics[width=1\textwidth]{SM_LiNbO3_Primitive}
\label{fig:figure}
\end{minipage}
\end{table}
The refractive indices of LiNbO3 calculated using B3LYP functional, together with the electronic and vibrational contributions to the polarizability $\alpha_{ij}$, are reported in Table \ref {table:2}. The ionic contribution at 633 nm is almost null.
\begin{table} [H]
    \centering
     \caption{  Refractive indices $n_{ii}$  of LiNbO$_{3}$ at 633 nm wavelength using B3LYP functional, showing the electronic and vibrational contributions to the polarizability $\alpha_{ij}$.}
\begin{tabular}{c c c | c}
\hline
&electronic & vibrational & n$_{ii}$ \\ [1ex]
\hline
$\alpha_{xx}$ & 244.77&  -0.60 &2.257\\[0.5ex]
$\alpha_{yy}$ & 244.77&  -0.60 &2.257\\[0.5ex]
$\alpha_{zz}$ & 216.36&  -0.48 &2.149\\[0.5ex]
 \hline \hline
\end{tabular}
 \label{table:9}
\end{table}
At the $\Gamma$ point, the optical phonons of LiNbO$_3$ can be classified according to the irreducible representation of the space group R3c into $\Gamma = 4A_{1} + 5A_{2} + 9E$. The A$_{1}$ and E modes are Raman and infrared active, while A$_{2}$ modes are inactive.

The calculated frequencies of the A$_{1}$ and E modes are shown in Table \ref{table:3} and compared with previous theoretical and experimental data. There is a good agreement between our calculations and available experimental values. In particular, B3LYP functional calculated frequencies are close to the experimental ones, with only a relative underestimate of the first A$_{1}$ mode. This might be due to the anharmonicity of this mode: The experimental frequency is substantially higher than the one calculated in the harmonic approximation; Considering the one-dimensional non-interacting oscillator approximation, a good approximation to the experimental value was obtained by Inbar and Cohen \cite {PRB-Inbar1996}. Increasing HF exchange (PBE0) gives relatively higher frequency values, while decreasing exchange (PBE(10$\%$) and PBE) brings lower values compared to the experimental results.\\
\begin{table} [H]
    \centering
     \caption{ Raman and IR active phonon mode frequencies (cm$^{-1}$) of ferroelectric LiNbO$_{3}$ calculated with several functionals, compared with previous theoretical and experimental results.}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c}
 \hline
   & B3LYB &PBE0 &PBE(10$\%$)& PBE & LDA \cite {PRB2000}  & exp \cite {Kojima_1993} & exp \cite {Claus1972}\\ [1ex]
 \hline\hline
 A1 & 232 &251&242&234&208 & 256 & /\\
   & 275 &291&279& 271&279 & 275&/\\

   & 340&346&332&322 &344 &332 &/\\

   & 636 &650&628& 611&583 & 637 &/\\
 \hline
 E & 143 &152&144& 140 &151 &  /& 155\\

  & 233 &241&229&221 &/&  /& 238\\

 &246 &259&250 &245&236 &   /& 265\\

 & 304 &315&302&294&307 &  / & 325\\
  & 344 &367&252&343& 334&  / & /\\
   & 361 &380&365& 355&352& / &/\\
    & 427 &434&414& 402&432 & /  &431\\
     & 576 &589&572&560 &526 &/   &582\\
     & 655 &674&654& 641&617 & / &668\\
 \hline  \hline
\end{tabular}
 \label{table:10}
\end{table}
In order to obtain the EO coefficients of LiNbO$_{3}$ using CRYSTAL17, we computed the electronic and vibrational contributions to the second hyperpolarizability $\beta_{ijk}(-\omega_{\sigma}; \omega, 0)$ at a wavelength of 633 nm as described in the main paper, then deduced the $\chi^{(2)}_{ijk}(-\omega_{\sigma}; \omega, 0)$ values that are given in Table  \ref{table:4} (see the main paper for the relation between the susceptibility $\chi^{(2)}_{ijk}$ and the hyperpolarizability $\beta_{ijk}$). For symmetry reasons, only 11 out of 27 elements of the rank three $\chi^{(2)}_{ijk}$ tensor are not null and only four elements are independent. These four elements are given in Table \ref{table:4}. We note that pure PBE functional gives the highest values of $\chi^{(2)}_{ijk}$, that is because pure DFT-PBE underestimates the gap, as discussed in the main paper.
\begin{table}[H]
    \centering
     \caption{Non-zero elements of $\chi^{(2)}_{ijk}(-\omega_{\sigma}; \omega, 0)$ (pm/V) tensor in LiNbO$_{3}$ computed at a wavelength of 633 nm using different functionals, with their vibrational and electronic contributions.}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c}
\hline
\multirow{5}{1cm} & \multicolumn{2}{p{2.5cm}}{\centering B3LYP} &  \multicolumn{2}{p{2.5cm}}{\centering PBE0} &  \multicolumn{2}{p{2.5cm}}{\centering PBE(10$\%$)}&  \multicolumn{2}{p{2.5cm}}{\centering PBE}\\
 $\chi^{(2)}_{ijk}$ & \multicolumn{1}{c}{vib} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{ele} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{vib} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{ele} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{vib}& \multicolumn{1}{c}{ele}& \multicolumn{1}{c}{vib}& \multicolumn{1}{c}{ele}\\ [1ex]

xxx  & 88.83 &13.28 & 66.43 & 8.18 &  104.8 & 19.53&136.17&50.30\\

xxz & -103.00 & -35.50& -84.37 &  -28 &-129.2&-53.15&-183.4&-66.36\\
yzy & -228.52 & -36.56& -188.73 & -27.60 &-269.1&-54.53&-338.5&-102.4\\
zzz & -250.08 & -76.66 &-220.04 & -63.05&-296.9&-103.1&-396.05&-117.8\\
\hline \hline
\end{tabular}
  \label{table:11}
\end{table}
Table \ref{table:12} gives the clamped and unclamped EO coefficients of LiNbO$_3$, considering only the four independent elements of r$_{ijk}$, and compares them with previous calculations and experiments. All functionals used in the present study agree well with experimental results, notably for the r$_{33}$ and r$_{13}$ coefficients. The clamped EO coefficients, taking in consideration the piezoelectric contribution, are also given in Table \ref{table:4}.
\begin{table} [H]
    \centering
     \caption{ Total r$_{ijk}(-\omega_{\sigma}; \omega, 0)$ EO tensor (pm/V) in LiNbO$_{3}$ computed at a wavelength of 633 nm using different functionals, together with previous calculations and experiments.}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c}
 \hline
  &  & B3LYB & PBE0 & PBE(10$\%$)& PBE& LDA \cite {PRBVeithen2004} &  exp \cite{Turner1966} & exp \cite{K.K.WONG2002} \\
\hline\hline
clamped&r$_{33}$ & 30.64 &   28.02& 30.45 &30.87& 26.9   & 30.8  &34\\
&r$_{13}$ & 10.68 & 9.14&   11.39 & 12.84& 9.7  & 8.6 &10.9\\
&r$_{11}$ & -7.86 &    -6.06& -7.79 &-9.59& 4.6  & 3.4 &/\\
&r$_{51}$ & 22.51 &  19.41&  21.99 &24.51& 14.9 &  28&/\\
\\
unclamped & & & &  & &  & &exp \cite{Abdi1998}\\
& r$_{33}$ & 31.59 &   34.32& 30.90 &31.20&  27   &32.6 & /\\
&r$_{13}$ & 12.10 & 10.92&   12.61  &13.81&  10.5  &10& /\\
&r$_{11}$ & -7.00 &    -5.00& -6.84 &-10.20&   7.5  &6& 9.9\\
&r$_{51}$ & 33.28 &  27.09& 31.94 &34.04&  28.6& 32.2& /\\
\hline  \hline
\end{tabular}
\label{table:12}
\end{table}
As the experimental values of EO coefficients are usually measured at finite electric field wavelength, in Figure \ref{fig:5} we show the dependence of photoelastic coefficients on the electric field wavelength (nm). From 633 nm up to the near-infrared wavelength range, the two coefficients remain almost constant, while below 633 nm a decrease is observed.
\begin{figure} [H]
    \centering
    \includegraphics [scale=0.6] {FIG1_SM_Photoelastic}
    \caption{Independent photoelastic p$_{52}$ and p$_{21}$ coefficients of the LiNbO$_3$ crystal computed at B3LYP level as a function of the electric field wavelength (nm).}
    \label{fig:5}
\end{figure}

\textbf { ZrO$_{2}$-HfO$_{2}$}\\

\begin{table} [H]
    \centering
     \caption{ The optimized geometry for ZrO$_{2}$  orthorhombic Pbc2$_{1}$.}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c}
 \hline
  o-ZrO$_{2}$ & a (\AA) &b  (\AA) &c  (\AA)\\
       &  5.34&5.14&5.16\\
 \hline\hline
Atom & x/a& y/b& z/c \\  [1ex]
Zr& 0.0274& 0.2644&-0.2545 \\ [1ex]
O1 & 0.3602& 0.0619& -0.1021 \\  [1ex]
O2& 0.2262& -0.4688&-0.0064\\ [1ex]
 \hline
 V ($\AA^{3}$) &141.62 \\
   \hline  \hline
\end{tabular}
\label{table:13}
\end{table}

\begin{table} [H]
    \centering
     \caption{ The optimized geometry for HfO$_{2}$  orthorhombic Pbc2$_{1}$.}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c}
 \hline
  o-ZrO$_{2}$ & a (\AA) &b  (\AA) &c  (\AA)\\
       &  5.28&5.07&5.10\\
 \hline\hline
Atom & x/a& y/b& z/c \\  [1ex]
Zr& 0.0312& 0.2651&-0.2551 \\ [1ex]
O1 & 0.3618& 0.0638& -0.1051 \\  [1ex]
O2& 0.2267& -0.4699&-0.00278\\ [1ex]
 \hline
 V ($\AA^{3}$) &136.52 \\
   \hline  \hline
\end{tabular}
\label{table:14}
\end{table}
The orthorhombic Pbc2$_{1}$ phase with a unit of 12 atoms (4 formula units) results in 36 vibrational modes, 3 for translation modes, and 33 optical phonon modes having the following irreducible representation at the zone center $ \Gamma$: \\
$$ \Gamma = 8 A_{1} + 9 A_{2} + 8 B_{1} + 8 B_{2}$$
The computed phonon frequencies are listed in Table \ref{table:8} .\\

For the rhombohedral phase R3m, also with a unit of 12 atoms (4 formula units) resulting in 36 vibrational modes, 3 for translation modes and 33 optical phonon modes, the  irreducible representation at the zone center $ \Gamma$ is:
$$ \Gamma = 8 A_{1} + 3 A_{2} + 11  E $$
The calculated frequencies are given in Table \ref{table:8}. Note that the computed E modes here are degenerate. The lowest E-TO1 (transverse optical) mode frequency depends strongly on the unit cell volume and can also be affected by other factors, like strain, oxygen vacancies, etc.
\begin{table}[H]
    \centering
     \caption{Raman and IR phonon mode frequencies (cm$^{-1}$) of ferroelectric ZrO$_{2}$ and HfO$_{2}$ calculated using B3LYP functional. Experimental data are also reported when available.}
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c}
\hline
\multirow{2}{1.5cm} &  \multicolumn{2}{p{2.5cm}}{\centering o-ZrO$_2$}  &  \multicolumn{1}{p{1.5cm}}{\centering o-HfO$_2$} &  \multicolumn{1}{p{1.5cm}}{\centering }&  \multicolumn{1}{p{1.5cm}}{\centering r-ZrO$_2$} &  \multicolumn{1}{p{1.5cm}}{\centering r-HfO$_2$}\\   [1ex]
  & \multicolumn{1}{c}{B3LYP} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{exp \cite {Uwe-2022-Raman}}  & \multicolumn{1}{c}{B3LYP} &  & \multicolumn{1}{c}{B3LYP}  & \multicolumn{1}{c}{B3LYP}  \\   [1ex]
A$_1$ & 102 &   /& 113 &A$_1$&171 &118\\
 & 186 &200& 153& & 220&171\\
 & 291 &  /& 253 &&267&267\\
 & 315& 320& 295&&352&284\\
 & 351& 340& 329& &449&423\\
 &387&/ &369&&534&537\\
 &445&/&451&&674&692\\
 &566& 580&589&&755&770\\ [1ex]
 A$_2$ &172 &/& 122&A$_2$&169&117\\
 &180&/&134&&332&312\\
 &192&200&148&&586&595\\
 &295&/&303&\\
 &400&/&414&E&76&20\\
 &482&/&496&&165&114\\
 &561&/&581&&174&123\\
 &634&/&654&&233&187\\
 &659&/&674&&325&271\\[1ex]
 B$_1$& 188& /&141&&358&304\\
 &224&/&218&&456&436\\
 &298&/&238&&536&540\\
 &329&/&311&&586&594\\
 &402&/&395&&683&702\\
 &514&/&533&&721&726\\
 &545& 550&554&\\
 &726& /&736&\\ [1ex]
 B$_2$& 165 & /&121&\\
 & 233& /&226&\\
 & 289& /&269&\\
 &345 & /&312&\\
 & 399&/ &369&\\
 & 461& /&484&\\
 & 622 &620&637&\\
 & 683&/ &697&\\
\hline  \hline
\end{tabular}
\label{table:15}
\end{table}

\medskip
\pagebreak
\bibliographystyle{unsrt

Materials Science (cond-mat.mtrl-sci); Optics (physics.optics)


Abstract: The far-ultraviolet is the most rapidly evolving portion of the spectrum in both very young galaxies and very old galaxies. The ``UV upturn'' in the spectra of elliptical galaxies shortward of 2000 Angstroms offers a promising probe of the ages and chemical evolution of very old galaxies. In early-type non-active galaxies with the bluest 1550-V colors, the bulk of the emission arises from Extreme Horizontal Branch (EHB) stars, along their evolution from the zero-age HB to the white-dwarf cooling curve. The strength of the UV-upturn is governed by the fraction of stars that evolve through the EHB phase, which is in turn governed by age, metallicity, helium abundance, and other parameters such as stellar rotation and binarity that might influence the amount of mass loss on the RGB. Spectral constraints on the nature of the hot stellar population from Astro-2 are reviewed, and new imaging results from the HST Faint Object Camera are presented. Attempts to measure evolution through observations of high-redshift elliptical galaxies in the rest-frame UV are reviewed.

\section*{References\@mkboth

\def\eps@scaling{.95}
\def\epsscale#1{\gdef\eps@scaling{#1}}

\def\plotone#1{\centering \leavevmode
    \epsfxsize=\eps@scaling\columnwidth \epsfbox{#1}}

\def\plottwo#1#2{\centering \leavevmode
    \epsfxsize=.45\columnwidth \epsfbox{#1} \hfil
    \epsfxsize=.45\columnwidth \epsfbox{#2}}

\def\plotfiddle#1#2#3#4#5#6#7{\centering \leavevmode
    \vbox to#2{\rule{0pt}{#2}}
    \special{psfile=#1 voffset=#7 hoffset=#6 vscale=#5 hscale=#4 angle=#3}}

\begin{document}
\title{UV Emission from Elliptical Galaxies Near and Far}

\author{Henry C. Ferguson$^*$ and Thomas M. Brown$^\dagger$}

\address{$^*$ Space Telescope Science Institute,
	      3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218\\
	$^\dagger$ NASA/GSFC, Code 681, Greenbelt, MD 20771}

\maketitle

\begin{abstract}
        The far-ultraviolet is the most rapidly evolving portion
of the spectrum in both very young galaxies and very old galaxies.
The ``UV upturn'' in the spectra of elliptical galaxies shortward of
2000\AA\ offers a promising probe of the ages and chemical
evolution of very old galaxies. In early-type non-active galaxies
with the bluest $1550-V$ colors, the bulk of the emission arises
from Extreme Horizontal Branch (EHB) stars, along their evolution from
the zero-age HB to the white-dwarf cooling curve. The strength
of the UV-upturn is governed by the fraction of stars that evolve
through the EHB phase, which is in turn governed by age, metallicity,
helium abundance, and other parameters such as stellar rotation
and binarity that might influence the amount of mass loss on the
RGB. Spectral constraints on the nature of the hot stellar population
from Astro-2 are reviewed, and new imaging results from the HST
Faint Object Camera are presented. Attempts to measure evolution through
observations of high-redshift elliptical galaxies in the rest-frame
UV are reviewed.

\end{abstract}

\section*{Background}

Giant elliptical galaxies show a large variation in the ratios of their
far-UV to optical fluxes. Shortward of 2000{\AA}, most ellipticals have
spectra that rise in $f_\lambda$ toward shorter wavelengths.  This hot
component has been known since the early days of space astronomy
\cite{CW79}. Observations and theory now seem to be converging on a
consensus that the dominant component in UV bright galaxies is extreme
horizontal branch (EHB) stars and their evolutionary progeny
\cite{GR90,FD93,DOR95,BCF94,BFD95,BFDD97,YDK97}.  This conclusion stems from the rather cool
temperature (25000 K) derived for the dominant component in NGC1399
\cite{Ferg91L}, and from computations that indicate that EHB stars can
provide enough far-UV photons over their lifetimes to produce the
elliptical galaxy fluxes, while other candidates such as PAGB stars
cannot.

While it seems clear that EHB stars provide the far-UV flux, it is less
clear how they got there. The general trend observed for globular
clusters is that the horizontal branch (HB) becomes redder with
increasing metallicity. Elliptical galaxies are even more metal rich
than Galactic globular clusters; they must somehow be able to buck the
trend. The HB morphology depends on age, metallicity, helium abundance,
and the amount of mass loss on the red giant branch. The helium-burning
core in HB stars has a mass (0.5 $M_\odot$) that is nearly independent
of these parameters. The position of stars along the HB thus depends on
the envelope mass, which in turn depends on the main-sequence mass and
the amount of mass lost during the RGB phase.  EHB stars (those with
$T_{eff} > 20000$~K) have envelope masses less than 0.05$M_\odot$.
Hence they must arise from stars that have lost nearly all the mass it
was possible for them to lose and still ignite helium in their cores.

There are several plausible ways to produce a minority population of
EHB stars in elliptical galaxies.

First, the giant elliptical galaxies may in general be {\it older} than
the galactic globular clusters.  This argument is a natural extension
of the interpretation of the second parameter effect in globular
clusters as being due to variations in age \cite{Lee94,PL95}.  The EHB stars in this model represent the extreme metal-poor
tail of the metallicity distribution, and are 2-4 Gyr older than the
most-metal poor globular clusters. They show up in giant elliptical
galaxies, which are on average metal rich, because these galaxies
formed first, and hence have the oldest stars.

Second, elliptical galaxies may have high helium abundance $Y$
\cite{GR90,BCF94,YADO95}.  At fixed age and metallicity, the
main-sequence lifetime decreases with increasing $Y$. Observations of
nearby star-forming galaxies and the galactic bulge hint at a rather
steep relation ($\Delta Y / \Delta Z > 2$) between helium abundance and
metallicity \cite{Pagel89p201,Renzini94}.  If this is the case, then
old metal-rich populations may have EHB stars, even with standard RGB
mass-loss rates. The required ages ($>7$ Gyr) are not as extreme as in
the Lee model. In these models, the EHB stars arise from the extreme
high-metallicity tail of the abundance distribution.

Third, some other process may act to increase mass loss in a small
fraction of the population. For example, EHB stars could arise from
stars in close binary systems that have shed their envelopes during
interactions with their companions, or they could arise only from
stars with high rotation rates. Such mechanisms could produce EHB
populations from anywhere in the abundance distribution, but might be
enhanced in giant ellipticals through some secondary effect (for
example binary fraction might somehow depend on galaxy metallicity or
velocity dispersion). In this case, the EHB stars may come closer to
reflecting the mean metallicity of the stellar population.

Whatever the mechanism for producing them, the fraction of EHB stars is
likely to be sensitive to age, because the main-sequence turnoff mass
is one of the parameters that influences the mass on the horizontal
branch. Indeed, it is likely that the fraction of EHB stars is {\it the
most sensitive} indicator of age for stellar populations older than
$\sim 5$ Gyr. For solar metallicity and ages 5-18 Gyr, the turnoff mass
varies as $-0.63 \log({\rm age})$, according to the Padova isochrones.
A difference of 0.05 $M_\odot$ is enough to move a star from the
UV-weak to the UV-strong portion of the horizontal branch.  In a
population with fixed age and chemical abundance and where no other
parameters influence horizontal-branch mass, a change in age of only
10\% could introduce changes in the UV/optical flux ratio of more than
an order of magnitude.

The problem in using the UV upturn in elliptical galaxies as an
age indicator is that it lacks a calibration, either empirical
or theoretical. Clearly we need a better understanding of the
EHB star population and the mechanisms that produce it.

What follows is a summary of attempts to constrain the metallicity
and helium abundance of the UV-emitting population from Hopkins
Ultraviolet Telescope (HUT) spectra, a preliminary discussion of the
properties of far-UV point sources seen in new images of the centers
of M31 and M32, and a summary of attempts to detect evolution
in the far UV emission from ellipticals as a function of redshift.

\section*{Astro-2 Spectroscopy}

During the Astro-2 shuttle mission in March 1995, HUT
\cite{DKLBBDDFFHKKMV92,Ketal95} observed six
elliptical galaxies, obtaining spectra at a resolution of 2-4\AA\
over the wavelengths from 912-1840\AA. The
$10^{\prime\prime} \times 56^{\prime\prime}$
slit covered the central regions of each galaxy. The results
of the observations and modeling are described in detail
by Brown and collaborators\cite{BFD95,BFDD97}.

\begin{figure}
\epsscale{0.9}
\centerline{\plotone{hferguson_fig1.eps}}
\caption{The best-fit PAGB+EHB star evolutionary model from each of the
Dorman et al. (1993) abundance subsets. The HUT spectrum of NGC 4649
(M60) is shown as a solid histogram; the models are shown as dashed lines.
The chemical abundances and envelope mass $M_{\rm env}$ are shown
for each track; the atmospheric abundance is $0.1 Z_\odot$.
The parameter $\Delta F$ is the fractional flux deficit
in the models relative to the data over the wavelength interval
912-970{\AA}.
Models with subsolar evolutionary abundances (shown in the panels on
the left) signficantly underpredict the observed flux shortward of
970{\AA}.
}
\end{figure}

To model the observations, we have constructed synthetic FUV
spectra for old stellar populations by integrating individual
synthetic stellar spectra over stellar evolutionary tracks.
The Dorman et al. \cite{DRO93} evolutionary models were used
for  EHB stars and their progeny (AGB-Manq\'e
and PEAGB stars).
A new set of model atmospheres of hot stars were constructed
for this purpose\cite{BFD96}. Composite spectra were
constructed for each of over one hundred evolutionary tracks.

Diffusion processes in the outer layers of hot, high-gravity stars
create inconsistencies between the abundances that determine the
evolution of the stars and the abundances in outer layers of the
stellar atmospheres \cite{MBWF85,LWF87,BWMF88}.
For this reason, we have constructed synthetic
spectra with three different atmospheric metallicities ($Z_{\rm atm} =
Z_\odot, Z_{\rm atm} = 0.1 Z_\odot$, and $Z_{\rm atm} = 0.01_\odot$) for
all of the different evolutionary paths, regardless of the underlying
abundance.

The galaxies have each been fit with single-mass populations of EHB
stars, and with composite populations of EHB stars + PAGB stars.  The
composite population models are more consistent with the data.
The best fits have
small fraction of the light coming from PAGB stars (less than 20\% at
1400{\AA}), but nevertheless a large fraction (more than 92\%) of the
stars evolve through the PAGB phase.  Figure 1. shows the results for
NGC 4649 for models of different metallicity and helium abundance. The
evolutionary tracks with high helium abundance and high metallicity
(shown in the right-hand panels)
produce the best fits. The low-metallicity alternatives do not produce
enough flux near the Lyman limit.

\begin{figure}
\epsscale{0.9}
\centerline{\plotone{hferguson_fig2.eps}}
\caption{The HUT data for NGC 4649 (histogram) are plotted with the best fit
EHB$ + $PAGB model (curve). The best-fit model has supersolar evolutionary
abundances ($Z = 0.04$, $Y = 0.27$), but we have synthesized the spectrum
with model atmospheres of three different abundances. The center
panel, with $Z_{\rm atm} = 0.1 Z_\odot$ provides the best match.
Small differences in the data shown in each panel are due to variations
in the airglow subtraction, since the airglow line fluxes were free
parameters in the fits.
}
\end{figure}

The best-fit models have stellar-atmosphere abundances
$Z_{\rm atm} = 0.1 Z_\odot$. The preference for this abundance over
solar or 0.01 solar can be seen quite clearly in Fig. 2. However,
because roughly half the flux comes from stars in the gravity$+$temperature
regime where a complicated balance between radiative levitation,
gravitational settling, and stellar winds determines the line strengths,
we do not believe the result rules out either the metal-rich or
the metal poor scenario. Among the six galaxies observed on Astro-2,
there is tendency for galaxies with stronger UV upturns to have
stronger lines, as expected in the high-metallicity scenario\cite{BFDD97}.

\section*{FOC Imaging}

To provide another view of the far-UV emitting population,
the nearby galaxies M31 and M32 were observed with the HST Faint
Object Camera. The images were taken through the F175W and F275W filters
(the numbers correspond to the filter central wavelengths in nm).
Figures 3 and 4 show color images constructed from the two FOC bands and
a WFPC-2 F555W band image. Preliminary color magnitude diagrams are
presented by Brown et al. (this volume). There a several inconsistencies
in the photometry that must be cleared up before trusting detailed
comparisons to the theoretical evolutionary tracks. Nevertheless,
broadly speaking the stars populate the portion of the CMD expected
from the spectral analysis.

Above the 6$\sigma$ detection
limit 1349 sources are found in M31 and only 183 in M32. These resolved
sources account for only a small portion of the far-UV flux in each
galaxy. In M31 the resolved sources produce
39\% of the flux at 1700{\AA}, while in M32 they account for only 8\%. Both
numbers are a bit uncertain due to the photometric errors, and because
some scaling had to be applied to convert from the IUE aperture to the
FOC aperture (assuming the UV surface brightness profile traces the
optical profile, which may not be a very good assumption). Note, however,
that this calculation is insensitive to red-leak  because the sources
themselves are UV bright and the estimate for the total UV flux comes
from IUE which is not affected by redleak (or red scattered light).

The fraction of the UV emission that is resolved in M31 is in keeping
with expectations, because much of the far-UV flux arises from stars
near the zero-age HB, which is well below the detection limit of the
images. For M32, the small fraction of the flux that is resolved is a
bit of a surprise, although it was hinted at by earlier FOC
observations\cite{KDABBBCDJKMMPWBGJNSS92,bertola95}. The implication is that most
of the far-UV emission from M32 is {\it not} due to low-mass PAGB
stars.  In a population of pure PAGB stars less massive than $0.7
M_\odot$ at least 15\% of the far-UV flux comes from stars with
temperatures $10^4 < T < 10^5 $K and luminosities $\log L/L_\odot >
3$.  Such stars would be easily detected in the FOC images. For typical
PN central stars of mass $0.6 M_\odot$ the contribution from resolved
sources should be more than 50\%.  Most of the far-UV emission in M32
must come from another source. One possibility is that the diffuse
light comes from normal blue HB stars in the metal-poor tail of
the metallicity distribution. Such emission should be present in all
elliptical galaxies, but is usually overwhelmed by the UV-upturn
component.

\begin{figure}
\epsscale{0.7}
\centerline{\plotone{hferguson_fig3.eps}}
\caption{Color image of M31 constructed from FOC F175W and F275W
images and a WFPC-2 PC image taken with the F555W filter.  The field of view
is $14 \times 14$ arcsec. More than 1000 UV-bright sources are detected.
}
\vspace{5pt}
\epsscale{0.7}
\centerline{\plotone{hferguson_fig4.eps}}
\caption{FOC + WFPC-2 Image of the center of M32. The field of view
is the same as for M31.
}
\end{figure}

\section*{Evolution with Redshift}

\begin{figure}
\epsscale{0.8}
\centerline{\plotone{hferguson_fig5.eps}}
\caption{Evolution of the UV upturn. Four elliptical galaxies from the
Hubble Deep field with measured redshifts are shown, together with
composite optical and UV spectra of NGC 1399 and M31 (the optical
and NUV portion of the M31 spectrum is courtesy of Daniela Calzetti).
}
\end{figure}

An obvious test of our understanding of the UV upturn phenomenon
is to try to detect the very strong evolution predicted by theory.
In either the metal-rich or the metal-poor scenario, the UV
upturn should disappear at lookback times of only 2-5 Gyr.
By $z > 0.3$, there should be no elliptical galaxies with optical
spectra consistent with passive evolution and strong UV upturns.

Numerous attempts have been made to confirm this prediction using HST.
To date all such attempts have been foiled by either poorer than
predicted sensitivities or poor understanding of scattered light. No
galaxies have been detected (save for Ly$\alpha$ emission from a few
radio galaxies), but the upper limits do not constrain the theory.

The Hubble Deep field provides a new data set to attempt to detect
this evolution. Redshifts have been measured now for over 100 galaxies
in the image, of which about eight appear morphologically to be
ellipticals.  Figure 5 shows the spectral energy
distributions derived from the HDF images and the
Hawaii \cite{SC97} IR images for galaxies with
$0.3 < z < 0.7$. Of the four galaxies, two are detected at rest-frame
wavelengths below 2000{\AA}, and two have only upper linits.
For the two detected, it will be important to get data at shorter
wavelengths (possible with STIS), and get high S/N spectra in
the optical to assess whether the spectrum is consistent
with pure passive evolution.

It will be difficult to get a definitive answer from a few random field
galaxies, since it is possible for a short burst of star formation to
produce a UV upturn without significantly affecting the optical
spectrum (although one might imagine detecting [OII] and/or H$\alpha$
emission in this case). A better measure of evolution  will come from
observations of several elliptical galaxies in each of several clusters
at different redshifts. We can hope to see such observations emerging
from STIS in the next few years.

\subsection*{Acknowledgements}
This work resulted from several different collaborations with Arthur
Davidsen and the HUT team, Ben Dorman, Adam Stanford, Ivan King
and Jean-Michelle Deharveng, and the STScI HDF working group.
This work is based in part on observations with the NASA/ESA
Hubble Space Telescope obtained at STScI, which is operated by
Aura, Inc, under NASA contract NAS5-26555.