Limiting the Heavy-quark and Gluon-philic Real Dark Matter

Abstract: We investigate the phenomenological viability of real spin half, zero and one dark matter candidates, which interact predominantly with third generation heavy quarks and gluons via the twenty-eight gauge invariant higher dimensional effective operators. The corresponding Wilson coefficients are constrained one at a time from the relic density $\Omega^{\rm DM} h^2$ $\approx$ 0.1198. Their contributions to the thermal averaged annihilation cross-sections are shown to be consistent with the FermiLAT and H.E.S.S. experiments' projected upper bound on the annihilation cross-section in the $b\,\bar b$ mode.The tree-level gluon-philic and one-loop induced heavy-quark-philic DM-nucleon direct-detection cross-sections are analysed. The non-observation of any excess over expected background in the case of recoiled Xe-nucleus events for spin-independent DM-nucleus scattering in XENON-1T sets the upper limits on the eighteen Wilson coefficients. Our analysis validates the real DM candidates for the large range of accessible mass spectrum below 2 TeV for all but one interaction induced by the said operators.

\section{Introduction}\label{intro}
\par Regardless of the unequivocal  astrophysical evidence from rotation velocity curves~\cite{Rubin1970} {\it via} mass-to-luminosity ratio, Bullet Cluster \cite{Clowe:2006eq}, and precision measurements of the Cosmic Microwave Background
(CMB) from WMAP \cite{Komatsu:2014ioa} and PLANCK \cite{Aghanim:2018eyx} satellites {\it etc.},  we have no clue about the fundamental nature of dark-matter (DM), which forms the  dominant matter component of the Universe.  The dedicated experiments for the direct-detection of DM  such as LUX~\cite{Akerib:2012ys}, XENON-1T~\cite{XENON:2018voc}, DarkSide50~\cite{DarkSide:2018bpj}, PandaX-4T ~\cite{PandaX-4T:2021bab} and CRESST-III~\cite{CRESST:2019jnq}, PICO-60~\cite{PICO:2019vsc}, PICASSO \cite{Behnke:2016lsk} are designed to measure the momentum of the recoiled atom and/ or nucleus  due to the  scattering of DM particles off  the sub-atomic constituents of the detector material \cite{Schumann:2019eaa, Bauer:2017qwy, Billard:2021uyg}. We have yet to observe a single event.  PandaX-4T \cite{PandaX-4T:2021bab} and PICO-60~\cite{PICO:2019vsc} have recently lowered the upper-limits of the measured sensitivities  at 90\% C.L. corresponding to  (a) spin-independent cross-sections at $3.3 \times 10^{-47}$ cm$^2$ for 30 GeV DM   and (b) spin-dependent cross-sections at $2.5 \times 10^{-41}$ cm$^2$  for 25 GeV DM respectively.  Efforts are being made to understand the nature of DM interactions by indirectly detecting DM resulting from DM pair annihilations  to SM particles using space based facilities such as Fermi-LAT~\cite{Ackermann:2015zua}, PLANCK data~\cite{Aghanim:2018eyx}, MAGIC~\cite{Acciari:2020pno} and some ground based large neutrino detectors such as  HESS~\cite{Abdallah:2016ygi}, Ice Cube~\cite{IceCube:2020wxa}, ANTARES~\cite{ANTARES:2019svn}, Super-Kamiokande~\cite{Super-Kamiokande:2011lwo} {\it etc}.
\par Past and ongoing experiments have constrained a plethora of viable UV complete dark matter models formulated by writing renormalizable Lagrangians with heavy non-SM mediators (spin 0$^\pm$, 1/2, 1, 2) facilitating interactions between DM and SM particles \cite{Bell:2016ekl, Albert:2016osu,Ko:2016zxg,Englert:2016joy,Dutta:2017jfj,Bauer:2017fsw,Bauer:2017ota,Baek:2017vzd,Carrillo-Monteverde:2018phy,Kraml:2017atm,LHCDarkMatterWorkingGroup:2018ufk}. The models with Higgs bosons as mediators have been excluded by the recent collider experiments \cite{ATLAS:2021pdg}. The analysis has also been performed in the domain of the effective field theory (EFT) for the EW-Boson-philic DM operators \cite{Cotta:2012nj,Chen:2013gya,Crivellin:2015wva}. Recently, the GAMBIT collaboration performed a global analysis for signatures of SM gauge singlet Dirac fermion DM at LHC in the EFT set-up with simultaneous activation of fourteen effective operators constructed in association with light-quarks, gluons and photons  (up-to mass dimension seven) where the authors have disfavored  the exclusive contribution of   DM  $\le $ 100 GeV \cite{GAMBIT:2021rlp}. The possibility of sterile neutrinos as DM candidates interacting with the third generation fermions has been recently analysed in the EFT approach in reference \cite{Bischer:2020sop}.  The collider signatures of the effective Lepto-philic DM operators have been studied for the proposed ILC  through $e^+e^-\to \gamma + \slash\!\!\!\!E_{\rm T}$ \cite{Barman:2021hhg,Bharadwaj:2020aal,Bharadwaj:2019zdp,Chen:2015tia,Dreiner:2012xm,Chae:2012bq,Fox:2011pm} and $e^+e^-\to Z^0 + \slash\!\!\!\!E_{\rm T}$ \cite{Bell:2012rg, Rawat:2017fak} channels.  Sensitivity analysis for DM-quark effective interactions at LHC have been performed \cite{Kahlhoefer:2017dnp,Mitsou:2014wta,Boveia:2018yeb,DeSimone:2016fbz,Bhattacherjee:2012ch} in a model-independent way for the dominant (a) mono-jet + $\slash\!\!\!\!E_{\rm T}$, (b) mono-$b$ jet + $\slash\!\!\!\!E_{\rm T}$ and (c) mono-$t$ jet + $\slash\!\!\!\!E_{\rm T}$ processes.

\par Various top-philic DM inspired models have been studied and  constrained \cite{Baek:2017ykw,Gomez:2014lva, Kilic:2015vka,Colucci:2018vxz,Garny:2018icg,Fuks:2019ziv,Zhang:2012da} by the cosmological relic density criteria, direct-detection and indirect-detection  experiments. The interactions of heavy-quark-philic DM are also constrained by the ongoing collider experiments. The CMS \cite{CMS:2019zzl,CMS:2018ysw} and ATLAS \cite{ATLAS:2020yzc} collaborations  investigated the dominant scalar-mediated production of $t$-quark-philic DM particles in association with a single top quark or a pair of $t\, \bar t$. CMS collaboration recently conducted an exclusive search analysis for the $b$-philic DM in reference
  \cite{CMS:2016uxr}. Many authors in the literature have explored mono-jet + $\slash \!\!\!E_T$ mode at the LHC for the  viable signatures of the scalar current induced heavy-quark-philic DM interactions \cite{Lin:2013sca,Haisch:2012kf,Bhattacherjee:2012ch, Goodman:2010ku}.  A comprehensive search analysis for heavy scalar mediated top-philic DM models  for mono-jets+ $\slash \!\!\!E_T$, mono-$Z$, mono-$h$ and $t\,\bar t$ pair productions at LHC can be found in \cite{Arina:2016cqj,Mattelaer:2015haa}.

\par The phenomenology of  spin 1/2, 0 and 1 real DM deserves a special mention in the context of their contributions to the DM-nucleon scattering events in the direct-detection experiments.
In the absence of the contributions from vanishing vector operators for Majorana, real scalar and real vector DM, the spin-independent DM-nucleon scattering cross-sections are found to be dominated by the respective scalar and dimension-8 twist operators \cite{Drees:1993bu,Hisano:2010ct, Hisano:2010yh, Hisano:2011cs, Hisano:2011um, Hisano:2012wm, Hisano:2015bma, Hisano:2015rsa}. The pseudo-scalar current contribution to the DM - nucleon scattering cross-section is found to be spin-dependent and velocity suppressed.   Similar studies have also been undertaken for lepto-philic real DM candidates \cite{Bharadwaj:2020aal,Bharadwaj:2019zdp}.

\par In this context, it is worthwhile to investigate the WIMP DM phenomenology induced by heavy-quark-philic and gluon-philic scalar, pseudo-scalar, axial-vector, and twist-2 real-DM operators and explore whether they satisfy the relic density criteria and other experimental constraints for a DM mass  between 10 GeV and 2 TeV. We introduce the effective Lagrangian for real spin 1/2, 0 and 1 DM particles in section \ref{model}. In section \ref{dmpheno}, we discuss the phenomenology of the dark-matter. We investigate the cosmological constraints on the DM  in sub-section \ref{relic}. In sub-section \ref{indirect}  we predict and analyse the thermally averaged DM pair annihilation cross-section. Sub-section \ref{direct} details the computation of  DM-nucleon scattering cross-sections and expected recoil nucleus event(s)  for XENON-1T \cite{XENON:2018voc} set up. Section \ref{summary}  summarises our study and observations.

\section{Heavy-Quark and Gluon-philic DM Effective Operators}
\label{model}
It is a fact that in a beyond-standard model (BSM) renormalizable gauge theory, as long as the energy range of DM-SM interaction is much below the mediator mass, the study of DM interactions can be restricted by the DM and SM degrees of freedom and their symmetries.

The higher dimensional effective operators are obtained from the BSM Lagrangian by writing the operator product expansion (OPE) of currents in the limit
$p^2/\, m_{\rm Med.}^2 <<$ 1, where $p^\mu$ represents the four momentum of the virtual mediator of mass $m_{\rm Med.}$.
This facilitates the effective contact interaction between DM and any SM third generation heavy quark/ gluon,  assuming that the mediator  mass scale $m_{\rm Med.}$  is of the order of the effective theory cut-off $\left(\sim \Lambda_{\rm eff}\right)$, which is much heavier than the masses of the SM and  DM  fields in general.
\par For example, in renormalizable models, the interaction between a Majorana DM $\chi$ and a third generation quark $\psi$ can be written  as
\begin{eqnarray}
{\cal L}^{\rm Dim.\,4}&=& \bar{\psi} \left(a + b\ \gamma_5\right) \chi\, \eta  + \bar{\psi}\,\gamma^\mu \left(c + d\ \gamma_5\right) \chi \,\zeta_\mu+\, {\rm h.c.} \label{dim4lag}
\end{eqnarray}
where $\eta$ and $\zeta_\mu$ are  electrically charged scalar and vector fields respectively. This interaction Lagrangian  facilitates the Majorana DM - quark interaction {\it via} $t$-channel exchange of the heavy $\eta$ and/ or $\zeta_\mu$.

By expanding the propagator in powers of $p^2/m_{\rm Med}^2$, the higher dimensional effective four-fermion interaction for spin 1/2 Majorana and heavy-quarks can be constructed.
This expansion induces the scalar, pseudo-scalar,  axial-vector  and twist-2 operators \cite{Drees:1993bu}. Such effective operators can also be obtained from other kinds of renormalizable interactions (say $s$-channel interactions).
\par Since  the interactions of the DM particles with  heavy-quarks  at the next-order in strong coupling constant  generate the DM-gluon interactions, it is imperative  to include the  operators  $\left(\propto \alpha_{\rm s}/\,\pi\right)$ involving a pair of Majorana DM and a pair of gluons in the effective Lagrangian. Thus,  integrating the heavy degrees of freedom and following the convention of reference \cite{Hisano:2015bma}, the  phenomenological effective Lagrangian for the heavy-quark-philic and gluon-philic Majorana DM is    written  as:
	\begin{eqnarray}
	{\cal  L}_{\rm eff}^{\chi} &=& \frac{C^q_{\chi_S}}{\Lambda^3}\, \mathcal{O}^q_{\chi_S} +\frac{C^q_{\chi_{\rm PS}}}{\Lambda^3}\, \mathcal{O}^q_{\chi_{\rm PS}} + \frac{C^g_{\chi_S}}{\Lambda^4}\, \mathcal{O}^g_{\chi_S} +\frac{C^g_{\chi_{\rm PS}}}{\Lambda^4}\, \mathcal{O}^g_{\chi_{\rm PS}} \nonumber\\
	&&\,\,\,\,\,\, + \frac{C^q_{\chi_{\rm AV}}}{\Lambda^2}\, \mathcal{O}^q_{\chi_{\rm AV}}+  \frac{C^p_{\chi_{T_{1}}}}{\Lambda^4}\, \mathcal{O}^p_{\chi_{T_{1}}}+\frac{C^p_{\chi_{T_{2}}}}{\Lambda^5}\, \mathcal{O}^p_{\chi_{T_{2}}} \,\,\,\ \\
\hspace{-0.5cm} {\rm where} \hspace{1cm} && \nonumber \\
	\mathcal{O}^q_{\chi_S} &=& m_q\, \left(\bar{\chi}\,\chi\right)\,\,\left( \bar{q}\, q\right)\hskip 1 cm {\rm and}\hskip 1 cm  \mathcal{O}^q_{\chi_{\rm PS}} = m_q\, \left(\bar{\chi}\,\gamma_5\,\chi\right)\,\,\left(\bar{q}\,\gamma_5\,q\right) \nonumber\\
	\mathcal{O}^g_{\chi_S} &=& \frac{\alpha_s}{\pi}\, m_\chi\, \left(\bar{\chi}\,\chi\right)\, \, G^A_{\mu\nu}\,\, {G^A}^{\mu\nu} \hskip 1 cm {\rm and}\hskip 1 cm  \mathcal{O}^g_{\chi_{\rm PS}} = \frac{\alpha_s}{\pi}\, m_\chi\, \left(i\,\bar{\chi}\,\gamma_5\,\chi\right) \, \,G^A_{\mu\nu}\,\,\widetilde{{G^A}^{\mu\nu} }\nonumber\\
	\mathcal{O}^q_{\chi_{\rm AV}} &=& \left(\bar{\chi}\,\gamma_\mu \,\gamma_5\, \chi\right)\,\left( \bar{q} \,\gamma^\mu\, \gamma_5\, q\right)\nonumber\\
	\mathcal{O}^p_{\chi_{T_{1}}} &=&\left( \bar{\chi} \,i \partial^\mu \,\gamma^\nu \,\chi\right)\,\, \,\mathcal{O}^p_{\mu\nu}\nonumber\\
	\mathcal{O}^p_{\chi_{T_{2}}} &=& \left( \bar{\chi}\, i \partial^\mu\, i\partial^\nu\, \chi\right)\, \,\,\mathcal{O}^p_{\mu\nu}
	 \label{MDMLag}
\end{eqnarray}
The second rank twist tensor currents ${\cal O}^{p}_{\mu\nu}$ for the heavy-quarks and gluons are defined as
\begin{subequations}
\begin{eqnarray}\label{twist2op}
 {\cal O}^{q}_{\mu\nu}&\equiv &i\,\frac{1}{2}\overline{q_L}\biggl(
{D_\mu^{}}_L\gamma_\nu^{} +{D_\nu^{}}_L\gamma_\mu^{}-\frac{1}{2}g_{\mu\nu}^{}
{\Slash{D}}_L\biggr)q_L+\ i\,\frac{1}{2}\overline{q_R}\biggl(
{D_\mu^{}}_R\gamma_\nu^{} +{D_\nu^{}}_R\gamma_\mu^{}-\frac{1}{2}g_{\mu\nu}^{}
{\Slash{D}}_R\biggr)q_R\nonumber\\
\\
{\cal O}^g_{\mu\nu}&\equiv&
\left[\left(G^A\right)^{\rho}_{\mu} \left(G^A\right)_{\nu\rho}-\frac{1}{4}\,g_{\mu\nu}\,\,
\left(G^A\right)_{\rho\sigma}\,\,\left(G^A\right)^{\rho\sigma}\right],
\end{eqnarray}
\end{subequations}
where ${D_\mu}_L$ and ${D_\mu}_R$ are the covariant derivatives for left and right handed quarks respectively in SM. The contribution from the vector operator vanishes for the real particles. It should be noted that we did not include severely constrained dimension-8 scalar operators because they are more likely to be suppressed by $\left(m_\chi\, m_q\right)/\,\Lambda^4$ than leading scalar operators. We do not analyse the less competitive heavy-quark-philic and gluon-philic pseudo-scalar operators in the direct-detection sub-section \ref{direct} as their contributions to the DM-nucleon scattering events are found to be spin and velocity suppressed. We exclude the contribution from dimension-9 twist-2 type-2 operators from our analysis because we limit our study to effective operators up to mass dimension-8.
\par We extend the domain of our analysis to include the effective contact  interactions of  real scalar $\phi^0$ and vector $V^0_\mu$ DM candidates  with a SM third generation heavy  quarks  and gluons. This can be obtained in a similar fashion  through OPE from renormalizable BSM interactions of the SM fermion with scalar or vector DM in the presence of a heavy charged fermion(s) as shown in reference \cite{Hisano:2015bma}. The effective scalar  DM Lagrangian are given as
\begin{eqnarray}
\mathcal{L}_{eff} &=& \frac{C^q_{\phi^0_S}}{\Lambda^2}\, \mathcal{O}^q_{\phi^0_S} + \frac{C_{\phi^0_S}^g}{\Lambda^2}\, \mathcal{O}_{\phi^0_S}^g + \frac{C^p_{\phi^0_{T_{2}}}}{\Lambda^4}\, \mathcal{O}^p_{\phi^0_{T_{2}}}\,\,\, {\rm where}\nonumber\\
\mathcal{O}^q_{\phi^0_S} &=& \left(\phi^0\, \phi^0\right)\, m_q\, \left( \bar{q}\,q\right)\nonumber \\
\mathcal{O}^g_{\phi^0_S} &=& \frac{\alpha_s}{\pi}\,\left(\phi^0\, \phi^0\right)\, G^A_{\mu\nu}\,\, G^{A\mu\nu}\nonumber \\
\mathcal{O}^p_{\phi^0_{T_{2}}} &=& \left(\phi^0\, i \partial^\mu\, i\partial^\nu\, \phi^0\right)\, \,\,\mathcal{O}^p_{\mu\nu} \label{SDMLag}
\end{eqnarray}
There are no contributions from pseudo-scalar and axial vector currents for the scalar DM operators. The effective vector DM Lagrangian is given as
\begin{eqnarray}
\mathcal{L}_{eff} &=& \frac{C^q_{V^0_S}}{\Lambda^2}\, \mathcal{O}^q_{V^0_S} +
\frac{C^q_{V^0_{\rm PS}}}{\Lambda^4}\, \mathcal{O}^q_{V^0_{\rm PS}} +
 \frac{C_{V^0_S}^g}{\Lambda^2}\, \mathcal{O}_{V^0_S}^g + \frac{C_{V^0_{\rm PS}}^g}{\Lambda^4}\, \mathcal{O}_{V^0_{\rm {\rm PS}}}^g  + \frac{C^q_{V^0_{\rm AV}}}{\Lambda^2}\, \mathcal{O}^q_{V^0_{\rm AV}}+ \frac{C^p_{V^0_{T_{2}}}}{\Lambda^4}\, \mathcal{O}^p_{V^0_{T_{2}}}\,{\rm where}\nonumber\\
\mathcal{O}^q_{V^0_S} &=& \left(V^0\right)^\rho \,\left(V^0\right)_\rho\, m_q\,\left(  \bar{q}\,q\right) \hskip 1 cm {\rm and}\hskip 1 cm \mathcal{O}^q_{V^0_{\rm PS}} = \left(V^0\right)^{\rho\sigma} \,\,\widetilde{\left(V^0\right)_{\rho\sigma}}\, m_q\,\left(i\,\bar{q}\,\gamma_5\,q\right)\nonumber \\
\mathcal{O}^g_{V^0_S} &=& \frac{\alpha_s}{\pi} \,\left(V^0\right)^\rho \,\left(V^0\right)_\rho\, G^A_{\mu\nu}\,\, {G^A}^{\mu\nu} \hskip 1 cm {\rm and}\hskip 1 cm \mathcal{O}^g_{V^0_{\rm PS}} = \frac{\alpha_s}{\pi} \,\left(V^0\right)^{\rho\sigma} \,\,\widetilde{\left(V^0\right)_{\rho\sigma}}\,\,\, G^A_{\mu\nu}\,\, \widetilde{{G^A}^{\mu\nu}} \nonumber \\
	\mathcal{O}^q_{V^0_{\rm AV}} &=& i \epsilon_{\mu\nu\rho\sigma} \left(V^0\right)^\mu i \partial^\nu \left(V^0\right)^\rho \bar{q} \gamma^\sigma \gamma_5 q\nonumber\\
\mathcal{O}^p_{V^0_{T_{2}}} &=& \left(V^\rho\right) i \partial^\mu i\partial^\nu \left(V_\rho\right)\, \mathcal{O}^p_{\mu\nu} \label{VDMLag}
\end{eqnarray}
where $\epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}$ is the totally antisymmetric tensor with $\epsilon^{0123}$ = +1.

\par Operators constructed from scalar, pseudo-scalar, axial-vector and twist-2 currents of heavy-quarks and gluons corresponding to Majorana, real scalar and real vector DM are phenomenologically analysed one at a time.

\section{Phenomenological Constraints on Real DM}
\label{dmpheno}
\subsection{Contribution of DM to relic density}\label{relic}
The present day relic abundance of the DM species $n_{\rm DM}(t)$  can be calculated by solving the Boltzmann equation
\begin{eqnarray}
	\frac{dn_{\rm DM}}{dt} + 3 \,H_0\, n_{\rm DM} &=& -\left\langle \sigma_{\rm ann} \left\vert \vec v_{\rm DM}\right \vert \right\rangle \bigg( (n_{\rm DM})^2 - (n_{\rm DM}^{\rm eq})^2 \bigg);\,\,\,
	 \label{BE}
\end{eqnarray}
where $n_{\rm DM}^{\rm eq}$ is  the DM number density at thermal equilibrium, $H_0$ is the Hubble constant, $\vec v_{\rm DM}$ is relative velocity of the DM pair and $\left\langle \sigma_{\rm ann} \left\vert \vec v_{\rm DM}\right \vert \right\rangle$ is the thermal average of the annihilation cross-section. It is customary to parametrise $\rho_{\rm DM} \equiv \Omega_{\rm DM} h^2\,\rho_c$, where $\rho_ c \equiv 1.05373 \times 10^{-5}\, h^2 /c^2 \,\,{\rm GeV\, cm^{-3}}$ is the critical density of the universe and dimensionless $h$ is the current Hubble constant in units of 100 km/s/Mpc. Solving the Boltzman equation \cite{Kolb:1990vq} we then get
\begin{eqnarray}
	{\Omega}^{\rm DM} h^2 =\frac{\rho^{\rm DM}}{\rho_{\rm critical}}\,h^2&\approx& 0.12 \left( \frac{2.2 \times 10^{-26}\ {\rm cm^3/s}}{\left\langle \sigma_{\rm ann} \left\vert\vec v_{\rm DM}\right\vert\right\rangle}\right) \left( \frac{80}{g_{\rm eff}}\right)^{1/2} \left( \frac{m_{DM}/T_F}{23}\right)  \label{RelicForm}
\end{eqnarray}
where parameter $x_F \equiv m_{\rm DM}/T_F$ is  a function of degrees of freedom of the DM $g$, the effective massless degrees-of-freedom $g_{\rm eff}$ ($\sim$ 106.75 and 86.75 above $m_t$ and $m_b$  mass-thresholds respectively) at freeze-out temperature $T_F$:
\begin{eqnarray}
	x_F = \ln \Bigg[ a(a+2) \sqrt{\frac{45}{8}}\ \frac{g\, M_{pl}}{2 \pi^3}\ \frac{m_{\rm DM}\langle\sigma_{\rm ann}\left\vert \vec v_{\rm DM} \right\vert\rangle}{\sqrt{x_F} \, g_{\rm eff}(x_F)} \Bigg];\hskip 0.2cm a\sim {\cal O}(1)\,\,\,{\rm and}\,\,\, M_{pl}=1.22 \times 10^{19}\,{\rm GeV}.\nonumber\\
\end{eqnarray}
\begin{figure}[h!]
	\centering
\hspace{-0.5cm}
  \begin{subfigure}{0.5\textwidth}
      \centering
	\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{Figures/RelicBotMDMCont.pdf}
      \caption{\em{}}	\label{fig:RelicFDMB}
  \end{subfigure}%
\hspace{0.2cm}
  \begin{subfigure}{0.5\textwidth}
      \centering
	\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{Figures/RelicTopMDMCont.pdf}
      \caption{\em{}}	\label{fig:RelicFDMT}
  \end{subfigure}%
  \vskip 0.1cm
  \begin{subfigure}{0.5\textwidth}
      \centering
	\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{Figures/RelicGluonMDMCont.pdf}
      \caption{\em{}}	\label{fig:RelicFDMG}
  \end{subfigure}%
	\caption{\em{The $b$-quark-philic and $t$-quark-philic Majorana DM contours for figures\ref{fig:RelicFDMB} and \ref{fig:RelicFDMT}   are drawn in  $m_{\chi}\, -\, \left\vert C^q_{{\chi}_S}\right\vert^{-1/3}\, \Lambda$, $m_{\chi}\, -\, \left\vert C^q_{{\chi}_{\rm PS}}\right\vert^{-1/3}\, \Lambda$, $m_{\chi}\, -\, \left\vert C^q_{{\chi}_{\rm AV}}\right\vert^{-1/2}\,\Lambda$ and $m_{\chi}\, -\,\left\vert C^q_{{\chi}_{T_{1}}}\right\vert^{-1/4}\,\Lambda$  planes corresponding to  scalar, pseudo-scalar,  axial-vector  and twist-2 type I operators respectively. The  gluon-philic Majorana DM contours in figure \ref{fig:RelicFDMG} are drawn in $m_{\chi}\, -\,\left\vert C^g_{{\chi}_{S}}\right\vert^{-1/4}\,\Lambda$, $m_{\chi}\, -\,\left\vert C^g_{{\chi}_{\rm PS}}\right\vert^{-1/4}\,\Lambda$  and $m_{\chi}\, -\,\left\vert C^g_{{\chi}_{T_{1}}}\right\vert^{-1/4}\, \Lambda$ planes for scalar, pseudo-scalar and twist-2 type-1 operators respectively. Cosmologically  allowed regions are shaded  below the respective contours satisfying $\Omega^\chi h^2$ = 0.1198~\cite{Aghanim:2018eyx}.}} \label{fig:RelicFermDM}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[h!]
	\centering
\hspace{-0.5cm}
  \begin{subfigure}{0.5\textwidth}
      \centering
	\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{Figures/RelicBotSDMCont.pdf}
      \caption{}	\label{fig:RelicSDMB}
  \end{subfigure}%
\hspace{0.2cm}
  \begin{subfigure}{0.5\textwidth}
      \centering
	\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{Figures/RelicTopSDMCont.pdf}
      \caption{}	\label{fig:RelicSDMT}
  \end{subfigure}%
    \vskip 0.1cm
  \begin{subfigure}{0.5\textwidth}
      \centering
	\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{Figures/RelicGluonSDMCont.pdf}
      \caption{}	\label{fig:RelicSDMG}
  \end{subfigure}%
	\caption{\em{The $b$-quark-philic, $t$-quark-philic and gluon-philic scalar DM contours for figures \ref{fig:RelicSDMB},  \ref{fig:RelicSDMT} and \ref{fig:RelicSDMG}   are drawn in  $m_{\phi^0}\, -\, \left\vert C^{q,\,g}_{{\phi^0}_S}\right\vert^{-1/2}\, \Lambda$ and $m_{\phi^0}\, -\,\left\vert C^{q,\,g}_{{\phi^0}_{T_{2}}}\right\vert^{-1/4}\,\Lambda$  planes corresponding to  scalar and twist-2 type-2 operators respectively.  Cosmologically  allowed regions are shaded  below the respective contours satisfying $\Omega^{\phi^0} h^2$ = 0.1198~\cite{Aghanim:2018eyx}.}} \label{fig:RelicScalDM}
\end{figure}

\begin{figure}[h!]
	\centering
\hspace{-0.5cm}
  \begin{subfigure}{0.5\textwidth}
      \centering
	\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{Figures/RelicBotVDMCont.pdf}
      \caption{}	\label{fig:RelicVDMB}
  \end{subfigure}%
\hspace{0.2cm}
  \begin{subfigure}{0.5\textwidth}
      \centering
	\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{Figures/RelicTopVDMCont.pdf}
      \caption{}	\label{fig:RelicVDMT}
  \end{subfigure}%
    \vskip 0.1cm
  \begin{subfigure}{0.5\textwidth}
      \centering
	\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{Figures/RelicGluonVDMCont.pdf}
      \caption{}	\label{fig:RelicVDMG}
  \end{subfigure}%
	\caption{\em{
	The $b$-quark-philic, $t$-quark-philic and gluon-philic vector DM contours for figures \ref{fig:RelicVDMB},  \ref{fig:RelicVDMT} and \ref{fig:RelicVDMG}   are drawn in  $m_{V^0}\, -\, \left\vert C^{q,\,g}_{{V^0}_S}\right\vert^{-1/2}\, \Lambda$,  $m_{V^0}\, -\, \left\vert C^{q,\,g}_{{V^0}_{\rm PS}}\right\vert^{-1/4}\, \Lambda$, $m_{V^0}\, -\, \left\vert C^{q}_{{V^0}_{\rm AV}}\right\vert^{-1/2}\, \Lambda$ and $m_{V^0}\, - \left\vert C^{q,\,g}_{{V^0}_{T_{2}}}\right\vert^{-1/4}\, \Lambda$  planes corresponding to  scalar,  pseudo-scalar, axial-vector and twist-2 type-2 operators respectively.  Cosmologically  allowed regions are shaded  below the respective contours satisfying $\Omega^{V^0} h^2$ = 0.1198~\cite{Aghanim:2018eyx}.}} \label{fig:RelicVectDM}
\end{figure}

\par  The predicted  DM relic density  $\Omega^{\rm DM} h^2$ of  $0.1138\pm .0045$ and $0.1199\pm 0.0022$  by WMAP   \cite{Komatsu:2014ioa} and Planck   \cite{Aghanim:2018eyx} collaborations respectively restrict  the thermal averaged  DM annihilation cross-section $\left\langle \sigma \left\vert \vec v_{\rm DM}\right\vert \right\rangle\ge 2.2 \times 10^{-26}$ ${\rm cm^3\ s^{-1}}$ as a smaller thermally averaged cross-section would render large DM abundance which will over-close the universe. We have analytically calculated the DM pair annihilation cross-sections  to a pair of third generation heavy quarks and  gluons in the Appendix \ref{annihilationCS}.
\par We investigate the DM  relic density contributions propelled by the thermally averaged annihilation cross-sections given in the appendix \ref{TherAvgCS} corresponding to the  the scalar, pseudo-scalar,  axial-vector and twist-2 currents of   heavy quarks for a given Majorana/\, scalar/\, vector DM mass and the respective Wilson coefficient.  The  annihilation channels induced by the scalar, pseudo-scalar and twist-2 currents of gluons  also contribute to the relic abundance of Majorana, scalar and vector DM.  We compute the  absolute lower-limits for all twenty-eight Wilson coefficients $  \left\vert C^{q,\,g}_{{\rm DM}_i\,O_j}/\, \Lambda^n\right\vert$ in TeV$^{-n}$ (${\rm DM}_i\equiv \chi,\,\phi^0,\,V^0$ and $O_j\equiv S/\,{\rm PS}/\, {\rm AV}/\, T_1/\, T_2$) by  activating one operator at a time and making the sole contribution from the corresponding operator to satisfy the relic density $\Omega^{\rm DM} h^2\approx 0.1199\pm 0.0022$ \cite{Aghanim:2018eyx}.  The lower bounds on the Wilson coefficients for a given DM mass are translated to the upper bound on $  \left\vert C^{q,\,g}_{{\rm DM}_i\,O_j}\right\vert^{-1/n}\,\Lambda$
in units of TeV. The Wilson coefficient larger than its lower limit for  a given DM mass, partially satisfy the relic density and thus may survive in cases where (a) more than one type of DM particle is allowed and/or (b) simultaneous switching of more than one effective operator.

\par For numerical computation of the DM relic density, we have used MadDM \cite{Ambrogi:2018jqj, Backovic:2013dpa}. The input model file required by  the MadDM is generated using FeynRules \cite{Christensen:2008py, Alloul:2013bka}, which calculates all the required couplings and Feynman rules by using the full Lagrangian given in equations \eqref{MDMLag}, \eqref{SDMLag} and \eqref{VDMLag} corresponding to Majorana, scalar and vector DM particles respectively.  We have further verified and validated our numerical results from MicrOMEGAs~\cite{Belanger:2010pz}.

\par In the figures  \ref{fig:RelicFermDM},\ref{fig:RelicScalDM} and \ref{fig:RelicVectDM}
we plot the relic density contours corresponding to Majorana, real scalar and real vector DM candidates, respectively. The contours of relic density  are defined in the  planes of  $ m_{{\rm DM}_i} -\left\vert C^{q,\,g}_{{\rm DM}_i\,O_j}\right\vert^{-1/n}\,\Lambda$. The left and right panels at the top  in all figures depict the contributions by $b$-quark-philic and $t$-quark-philic DM  respectively. The lower panel in all figures depicts the contribution by gluon-philic DM.

\subsection{Indirect detection of DM pairs}\label{indirect}
\par Today, the WIMP Dark Matter in the universe is expected to be trapped in large gravitational potential wells, which further enhances the number density of DM in the region, resulting in frequent collisions among themselves. This facilitates DM-DM pair annihilation into a pair of SM particles (photons, leptons, hadronic jets, etc) at the Galactic centre, in Dwarf Spheroidal galaxies (dSphs), Galaxy clusters, and Galactic halos.  The dwarf spheroidal satellite galaxies of the Milky Way are especially promising targets for DM indirect detection due to their large dark matter content, low diffuse Galactic $\gamma$-ray foregrounds as they travel the galactic distance, and lack of conventional astrophysical $\gamma$-ray production mechanisms.  Their flux is observed by the satellite-based $\gamma$-ray observatory Fermi-LAT~\cite{Ackermann:2015lka}, PLANCK ~\cite{Aghanim:2018eyx}, primary cosmic rays measurements by AMS-02 \cite{Aguilar:2014mma,Aguilar:2016kjl} on International Space Station and the ground-based Cherenkov telescope H.E.S.S.~\cite{Abramowski:2011hc, Abramowski:2013ax, Abdallah:2016ygi, Abdallah:2020sas}, HAWC \cite{Vargas:2016hcp, Albert:2017vtb, Lundeen:2020pnm}, MAGIC \cite{Acciari:2020pno}.
\begin{figure}[h!]
	\centering
\hspace{-0.5cm}
  \begin{subfigure}{0.5\textwidth}
      \centering
	\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{Figures/IDBotMDMXsec.pdf}
      \caption{}	\label{fig:IDFb}
  \end{subfigure}%
\hspace{0.1cm}
  \begin{subfigure}{0.5\textwidth}
      \centering
	\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{Figures/IDTopMDMXsec.pdf}
      \caption{}	\label{fig:IDFt}
  \end{subfigure}%
	\caption{\em{ Figures \ref{fig:IDFb} and \ref{fig:IDFt} depict the thermally averaged cross-sections for Majorana DM pair annihilation into  $b\bar{b}$ and $t\bar{t}$ pairs, respectively. The contributions from pseudo-scalar, axial-vector and twist-2 type-1 operators   in both the panels are evaluated using their respective  lower bound on $  \left\vert C^{q}_{\chi_{{\rm PS},\,{\rm AV},\, T_1}}/\, \Lambda^n\right\vert $ satisfying  $\Omega^{\chi } h^2$ = $0.1199\pm 0.0022$  \cite{Aghanim:2018eyx} as shown in figure \ref{fig:RelicFermDM} and hence, the unshaded regions above the respective curves are cosmologically allowed.   Regions above the  the experimental limits obtained from  FermiLAT~\cite{Ackermann:2015zua} as well as H.E.S.S.~\cite{Abdallah:2016ygi} are excluded.}}
	\label{fig:IDFermDM}
\end{figure}
\par $t$-quark-philic DM annihilation yields a pair of $t\bar t$,  where the $t\, \, (\bar t)$  decays into $b\,\, (\bar b)$  associated with $W^+$ ($W^-$) with 100 \% branching fraction. The charged gauge Bosons then decays in either  leptonic or semi-leptonic or hadronic modes. The gluons and/or pair of $b\,\bar b$ produced by DM pair's annihilation  hadronized partially to neutral pions, which  then decayed to photon pairs ($\pi^0 \rightarrow \gamma\gamma$) with a $99\%$ branching fraction, yielding a broad spectrum of photons.
We compare the thermally averaged DM annihilation cross-sections to the $b\bar{b}$, $t\bar{t}$ and $gg$ channels with the corresponding upper  bounds derived from  the observed photon spectrum in both FermiLAT~\cite{Ackermann:2015zua} and H.E.S.S.~\cite{Abdallah:2016ygi} indirect experiments.
\begin{figure}[h!]
	\centering
\hspace{-0.5cm}
  \begin{subfigure}{0.5\textwidth}
      \centering
	\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{Figures/IDBotSDMXsec.pdf}
      \caption{}	\label{fig:IDSb}
  \end{subfigure}%
\hspace{0.1cm}
  \begin{subfigure}{0.5\textwidth}
      \centering
	\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{Figures/IDTopSDMXsec.pdf}
      \caption{}	\label{fig:IDSt}
      \end{subfigure}%
      \\
        \begin{subfigure}{0.5\textwidth}
      \centering
	\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{Figures/IDGluonSDMXsec.pdf}
      \caption{}	\label{fig:IDSg}
  \end{subfigure}%

	\caption{\em{ Figures \ref{fig:IDSb}, \ref{fig:IDSt}  and \ref{fig:IDSg} depict the thermally averaged cross-sections for real scalar DM pair annihilation into  $b\bar{b}$, $t\bar{t}$ and $g\,g$ pairs, respectively. The   contributions from scalar and twist-2 type-2 operators in the panels are evaluated using their respective  lower bound on $  \left\vert C^{q,\,g}_{\phi^0_{S,\, T_2}}/\, \Lambda^n\right\vert$ satisfying  $\Omega^{\phi^0} h^2$ = $0.1199\pm 0.0022$  \cite{Aghanim:2018eyx} as shown in figure \ref{fig:RelicScalDM}  and hence, the unshaded regions above the respective curves are cosmologically allowed.  Regions above the  the experimental limits obtained from  FermiLAT~\cite{Ackermann:2015zua} as well as H.E.S.S.~\cite{Abdallah:2016ygi} are excluded.}}
	\label{fig:IDScalDM}
\end{figure}

\begin{figure}[h!]
	\centering
\hspace{-0.5cm}
  \begin{subfigure}{0.5\textwidth}
      \centering
	\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{Figures/IDBotVDMXsec.pdf}
      \caption{}	\label{fig:IDVb}
  \end{subfigure}%
\hspace{0.1cm}
  \begin{subfigure}{0.5\textwidth}
      \centering
	\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{Figures/IDTopVDMXsec.pdf}
      \caption{}	\label{fig:IDVt}
  \end{subfigure}%
  \\
  	\centering
  \begin{subfigure}{0.5\textwidth}
      \centering
	\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{Figures/IDGluonVDMXsec.pdf}
      \caption{}	\label{fig:IDVg}
  \end{subfigure}%

	\caption{\em{Figures \ref{fig:IDVb}, \ref{fig:IDVt} and \ref{fig:IDVg} depict the thermally averaged cross-sections for real vector DM pair annihilation into  $b\bar{b}$, $t\bar{t}$ and $g\,g$ pairs, respectively. The contributions from scalar operator in the panels are evaluated using their respective  lower bound on $  \left\vert C^{q,\,g}_{V^0_{S}}/\, \Lambda^n\right\vert$ satisfying  $\Omega^{V^0} h^2$ = $0.1199\pm 0.0022$  \cite{Aghanim:2018eyx} as shown in figure \ref{fig:RelicVectDM}  and hence, the unshaded regions above the respective curves are cosmologically allowed.  Regions above the  the experimental limits obtained from  FermiLAT~\cite{Ackermann:2015zua} as well as H.E.S.S.~\cite{Abdallah:2016ygi} are excluded.}}
	\label{fig:IDVectDM}
\end{figure}

\par The analytic expressions of thermally averaged DM pair annihilation cross-sections $\left\langle \sigma \left\vert\vec v_{\rm DM}\right\vert\right \rangle$ for Majorana, scalar, and vector DM are given in the Appendix \ref{TherAvgCS} and agree with what is known for other fermions  in the literature  ~\cite{Zheng:2010js, Yu:2011by, Rawat:2017fak, Bharadwaj:2020aal}. These are derived from the cross-sections  in the Appendix \ref{annihilationCS} in which the center of mass energy squared $s$ is expanded as   $\approx$ $4 \, m^2_{\rm DM} + m^2_{\rm DM}\, \left\vert \vec v_{\rm DM} \right\vert^2+ \frac{3}{4}\, m_{\rm DM}^2 \left\vert\vec v_{\rm DM}\right\vert^4$ + $\mathcal{O}\left(\left\vert\vec v_{\rm DM}\right\vert^6\right)$. It is to be noted that  DM velocity  $\left\vert\vec v_{\rm DM}\right\vert$ is roughly of the order of $\sim 10^{-3}\, c$ at the center of Galaxy and  $10^{-5}\, c$ at dSphs in contrast to that of $10^{-1}\,c$ at freeze-out.  In comparison to all chiral blind $s$-dominated processes, the leading term contributions from the $p$-wave and $d$-wave channels in $\left\langle \sigma \left\vert \vec v_{\rm DM}\right\vert \right\rangle$ are proportional to $\left\vert\vec v_{\rm DM}\right\vert^2$ and $\left\vert \vec v_{\rm DM}\right\vert^4$, respectively, and thus suppressed.

\par  For  varying $m_{\rm DM}$,  we investigate the contributions to the  thermally averaged  DM pair annihilations cross-sections  into   $b\,\bar b$, $t\,\bar t$ and $g\,g$ pairs. Using  the respective lower bound on the Wilson coefficients   for a given $m_\chi$ as shown in figure  \ref{fig:RelicFermDM}, we calculate and depict the variation of cosmological lower bound on the thermally averaged Majorana DM pair annihilation cross-sections with Majorana DM mass for $\chi\,\bar{\chi} \rightarrow b\,\bar{b}$ and $\chi\,\bar{\chi} \rightarrow t\,\bar{t}$ in figures \ref{fig:IDFb} and \ref{fig:IDFt} respectively. We observe that the variation of chirally suppressed axial-vector operator induced $\left\langle \sigma \left\vert \vec v_\chi\right\vert \right\rangle$ {\it w.r.t.} DM mass has a negative slope resulting from its leading term $\propto \left(m^2_f/\,\Lambda^4\right)\sqrt{1-m^2_f/\,m^2_\chi}$ in equation \eqref{FDMIDQAV} which is in sharp contrast to  almost flat-curve (in log scale) variation of that    induced by the chirality conserving twist-2 type-1 operator where the leading term is $\propto m_\chi^6/\,\Lambda^8$ in equation \eqref{FDMIDQT1}.  In case  of the twist-2 type-1 operator the suppression due to  increment in the cosmological upper bound on $\Lambda$ is compensated with the increment in the DM mass alone. The negligible contributions from  the heavy-quark-philic scalar $\mathcal{O}^q_{\chi_S}$ operator given in equation \eqref{FDMIDQS} is attributed to the chiral suppression along with DM velocity dependence while  gluon-philic scalar $\mathcal{O}^g_{\chi_S}$, pseudo-scalar $\mathcal{O}^g_{\chi_{\rm PS}}$  and  twist-2 type-1  $\mathcal{O}^g_{\chi_{T_1}}$ operators given in equations \eqref{FDMIDGS}, \eqref{FDMIDGPS} and \eqref{FDMIDGT} respectively are $p$-wave suppressed and hence  not shown in the graph.

\par Similarly, we plot the variation of the cosmological lower bound of the thermally averaged DM annihilation cross-section ($\phi^0\,\phi^0\rightarrow b\,\bar{b}/\,\,t\,\bar{t}/\,\,g\,g$) with scalar DM mass   $m_{\phi^0}$ in figure \ref{fig:IDScalDM}.  The  $\left\langle \sigma \left\vert\vec v_{\phi^0}\right\vert\right \rangle$ induced by the  heavy-quark-philic twist-2 type-2 operator $\mathcal{O}^q_{\phi^0_{T_2}}$ given in  \eqref{SDMIDeqTwist} is chirally suppressed and therefore falls sharply with an increasing DM mass as shown in figure \ref{fig:RelicScalDM}.  The sharp fall in the $t$-quark-philic case, on the other hand, is flattened for DM mass ranges of less than 2 TeV. The gluon-philic twist-2 type-2 operator is $d$-wave $\propto v^4$ suppressed  as shown in equation \eqref{SDMIDeqGluonT}.
Figure \ref{fig:IDVectDM} show the thermally averaged vector DM  pair annihilation cross-sections of the third generation quarks and gluons with varying vector DM mass corresponding to the  respective cosmological lower bound on the Wilson coefficient as shown in figure \ref{fig:RelicVectDM}. Unlike  the  chiral $p$-wave suppressed  axial-vector  and $d$-wave suppressed twist-2 type-2 operators, we observe an appreciable contribution to the $\left\langle \sigma \left\vert \vec v_{V^0}\right\vert \right\rangle$  from the  heavy-quark-philic and gluon-philic scalar and pseudo-scalar operators  $\sim 10^{-26}\, {\rm cm}^3 {\rm s}^{-1}$.

\subsection{DM-nucleon scattering}\label{direct}
\begin{figure}[h!]
	\centering
	\includegraphics[scale=0.4]{Figures/DD.png}
	 \caption{\em{One-loop Majorana DM-gluon scattering diagrams where the blob represents the four fermionic effective interactions induced by the scalar / axial-vector / twist-2 currents of heavy quarks.}}\label{DDfeyndia}
\end{figure}
In direct-detection experiments, the scattering of DM particles can be broadly classified as (a) DM-electron scattering, (b) DM-atom scattering, and (c) DM-nucleon scattering. In the absence of heavy sea quarks and anti-quarks inside nucleons at the direct-detection energy scale, the $b$-quark-philic and $t$-quark-philic DM interacts with the constituent gluons {\it via} a loop, as shown in figure  \ref{DDfeyndia}.
 \par We compute the dominant DM-gluon one-loop elastic scattering amplitudes induced by the scalar, axial-vector, and twist-2 point interactions among DM and heavy quarks. The mass scale $m_Q$ of the heavy quarks running in the loop and the QCD coupling strength $\alpha_s$ characterise the loop-amplitudes. We derive the phenomenological effective DM-gluon interaction Lagrangians given in \eqref{LeffMDMgluon}, \eqref{LeffSDMgluon} and \eqref{LeffVDMgluon} which correspond to Majorana, real scalar, and real vector DM candidates, respectively.
\begin{figure}[h!]
	\centering
\hspace{-0.5cm}
  \begin{subfigure}{0.5\textwidth}
      \centering
	\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{Figures/DDBotMDMXsec.pdf}
      \caption{}	\label{fig:DDMDMb}
  \end{subfigure}%
\hspace{0.1cm}
  \begin{subfigure}{0.5\textwidth}
      \centering
	\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{Figures/DDTopMDMXsec.pdf}
      \caption{}	\label{fig:DDMDMt}
  \end{subfigure}%
  \\
    \begin{subfigure}{0.5\textwidth}
      \centering
	\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{Figures/DDGluonMDMXsec.pdf}
      \caption{}	\label{fig:DDMDMg}
  \end{subfigure}%
	\caption{\em{ Figures \ref{fig:DDMDMb}, \ref{fig:DDMDMt} and \ref{fig:DDMDMg} depict the  spin-independent $b$-quark-philic, $t$-quark-philic and gluon-philic Majorana DM-nucleon    scattering cross-sections respectively. The scalar and twist-2 type-1 contributions in all panels  are evaluated using their respective  lower bounds on the $  \left\vert C^{q,\,g}_{\chi_{S,\,T_1}}/\, \Lambda^n\right\vert $ satisfying  $\Omega^{\chi} h^2$ = $0.1199\pm 0.0022$  \cite{Aghanim:2018eyx} as shown in figures \ref{fig:RelicFermDM}  and hence, regions above the solid curves  are cosmologically allowed. Regions above the experimental limits obtained from XENON-1T~\cite{XENON:2018voc} and PandaX-4T\cite{PandaX-4T:2021bab} are excluded.}}
	\label{fig:DDMDMX}
\end{figure}

\par Since the non-relativistic DM particles scatter the nucleons and not the free gluons, we perform the non-relativistic reduction of the interaction Lagrangian given in the Appendix \ref{DDappendix}. We connect the DM-gluon amplitudes induced by the scalar and twist-2 currents of heavy-quarks at one-loop order with their respective DM-effective nucleon interactions by evaluating the expectation values of the zero momentum scalar  and twist-2 gluon-philic operators between the initial and final nucleons in equations \eqref{fTGinfo} and \eqref{gluontwisNR} respectively. The Majorana, real scalar, and real vector DM-nucleon scattering cross-sections driven by the heavy-quark scalar, axial-vector, and twist-2 currents  are given as
\begin{subequations}
\begin{eqnarray}
\sigma^{q^{\chi N}}_{\rm S}
&=&\frac{8}{81}\frac{1}{\pi} \left(C_{\chi_S}^q\right)^2\left[ \frac{1\, {\rm TeV}}{\Lambda}\right]^6\,\left[\frac{m_N}{1\, {\rm GeV}}\right]^2\left[\frac{\mu_{N\chi}}{1\,{\rm GeV}}\right]^2\,\left[\frac{\alpha_s\left(\Lambda\right)}{\alpha_s\left(\mu\right)}\right]^2\nonumber\\
&&\,\,\,\, \times   \left\vert I_S^{gg}\right\vert^2\, \left\vert f^N_{\rm TG}\right\vert^2 \left(3.9\times 10^{-46}\right)\, {\rm cm}^{2}\label{ScattScalMDM}\end{eqnarray}
\begin{eqnarray}
\sigma^{q^{\chi N}}_{\rm AV}
&=&\frac{16}{3}\frac{1}{\pi} \left(C_{\chi_{\rm AV}}^q\right)^2\left[ \frac{1\, {\rm TeV}}{\Lambda}\right]^4\,\left[\frac{\mu_{N\chi}}{1\,{\rm GeV}}\right]^2\,\left[\frac{\alpha_s\left(\Lambda\right)}{\alpha_s\left(\mu\right)}\right]^2\, \left[\frac{175\, {\rm GeV}}{m_Q}\right]^4\left\vert I_{\rm AV}^{gg}\right\vert^2\nonumber\\
&&\times \left[ \frac{\left\vert \vec q\right\vert}{10\, {\rm MeV}} \right]^4 \left[\displaystyle \sum_{q=u,\,d,\,s}\Delta_q^{(N)}\,\frac{\bar m}{m_q} \right]^2\left[\frac{{\cal J}+1}{\cal J}\right]S_N\,S_N^\prime \,  \left(4.13 \times 10^{-57}\right)\, {\rm cm}^{2}\nonumber\\
\label{ScattAVMDM}\end{eqnarray}
\begin{eqnarray}
\sigma^{q^{\chi N}}_{\rm T}
&=& \frac{2}{\pi}\, \left(C^q_{\chi_T}\right)^2 \bigg[\frac{1\, {\rm TeV}}{\Lambda}\bigg]^8\, \bigg[\frac{\alpha_s(\Lambda)}{4 \pi}\bigg]^2\, \left[\frac{\mu_{\chi N}}{1\, {\rm GeV}}\right]^2\, \left[\frac{M_\chi}{100\, {\rm GeV}}\right]^2\, \left[\frac{m_N}{1\, {\rm GeV}}\right]^2\, \nonumber\\
&&\,\,\,\, \times \, \left[ \ln\left(\frac{\Lambda^2}{m_Q^2}\right) \right]^2\,\left\vert (g(2;\Lambda)\right\vert^2\, \left(1.98 \times 10^{-48}\right)\, {\rm cm^2}
\label{ScattTwistMDM}
\end{eqnarray}
\end{subequations}
\begin{subequations}
\begin{eqnarray}
\sigma^{q^{\phi^0 N}}_{ S}
&=&\frac{4}{81}\,\frac{1}{\pi} \left(C_{\phi^0_S}^q\right)^2\left[ \frac{1\, {\rm TeV}}{\Lambda}\right]^4\,\left[ \frac{100\, {\rm GeV}}{m_{\phi^0}}\right]^2\left[\frac{m_N}{1\, {\rm GeV}}\right]^2\left[\frac{\mu_{N\chi}}{1\,{\rm GeV}}\right]^2\,\left[\frac{\alpha_s\left(\Lambda\right)}{\alpha_s\left(\mu\right)}\right]^2 \nonumber\\
&&\,\,\,\,\times  \left\vert I_S^{gg}\right\vert^2\, \left\vert f^N_{\rm TG}\right\vert^2 \left(3.9 \times 10^{-44}\right)\, {\rm cm}^{2}\label{ScattScalSDM}\end{eqnarray}
\begin{eqnarray}
\sigma^{q^{\phi^0 N}}_{T_2}
&=& \frac{1}{2\pi}\, \left(C^q_{\phi^0_{T_2}}\right)^2 \bigg[\frac{1\, {\rm TeV}}{\Lambda}\bigg]^8\, \bigg[\frac{\alpha_s(\Lambda)}{4 \pi}\bigg]^2\, \left[\frac{\mu_{\phi^0 N}}{1\, {\rm GeV}}\right]^2\, \left[\frac{M_{\phi^0}}{100\, {\rm GeV}}\right]^2\, \left[\frac{m_N}{1\, {\rm GeV}}\right]^2\, \nonumber\\
&&\,\,\,\, \times \, \left[ \ln\left(\frac{\Lambda^2}{m_Q^2}\right) \right]^2 \,\left\vert g(2;\Lambda)\right\vert^2\, \left(1.98 \times 10^{-48}\right)\, {\rm cm^2}
\label{ScattTwistSDM}\end{eqnarray}
\end{subequations}
\begin{subequations}
\begin{eqnarray}
\sigma^{q^{V^0 N}}_{S}
&=&\frac{4}{243}\frac{1}{\pi} \left(C_{V^0_S}^q\right)^2\left[ \frac{1\, {\rm TeV}}{\Lambda}\right]^4\,\left[ \frac{100\, {\rm GeV}}{m_{V^0}}\right]^2\left[\frac{m_N}{1\, {\rm GeV}}\right]^2\left[\frac{\mu_{N\chi}}{1\,{\rm GeV}}\right]^2\,\left[\frac{\alpha_s\left(\Lambda\right)}{\alpha_s\left(\mu\right)}\right]^2\nonumber\\
&&\,\,\,\,\times   \left\vert I_S^{gg}\right\vert^2\, \left\vert f^N_{\rm TG}\right\vert^2 \left(3.9 \times 10^{-44}\right)\, {\rm cm}^{2}\label{ScattScalVDM}\end{eqnarray}
\begin{eqnarray}
\sigma^{q^{V^0 N}}_{\rm AV}
&=&\frac{32}{9}\frac{1}{\pi} \left(C_{V^0_{\rm AV}}^q\right)^2\left[ \frac{1\, {\rm TeV}}{\Lambda}\right]^4\,\left[\frac{\mu_{NV^0}}{1\,{\rm GeV}}\right]^2\,\left[\frac{\alpha_s\left(\Lambda\right)}{\alpha_s\left(\mu\right)}\right]^2\,  \left[\frac{175\, {\rm GeV}}{m_Q}\right]^4\left\vert I_{\rm AV}^{gg}\right\vert^2\nonumber\\
&&\times \left[ \frac{\left\vert \vec q\right\vert}{10\, {\rm MeV}} \right]^4 \left[\displaystyle \sum_{q=u,\,d,\,s}\Delta_q^{(N)}\,\frac{\bar m}{m_q} \right]^2\left[\frac{{\cal J}+1}{\cal J}\right]S_N\,S_N^\prime \,  \left(4.13 \times 10^{-57}\right)\, {\rm cm}^{2}\label{ScattAVVDM}\end{eqnarray}
\begin{eqnarray}
\sigma^{q^{V^0 N}}_{T_2}
&=& \frac{1}{6\pi}\, \left(C^q_{V^0_{T_2}}\right)^2 \left[\frac{1\, {\rm TeV}}{\Lambda}\right]^8\, \left[\frac{\alpha_s(\Lambda)}{4 \pi}\right]^2\, \left[\frac{\mu_{V^0 N}}{1\, {\rm GeV}}\right]^2\, \left[\frac{M_{V^0}}{100\, {\rm GeV}}\right]^2\, \left[\frac{m_N}{1\, {\rm GeV}}\right]^2\, \nonumber\\
&&\,\,\,\, \times \, \left[ \ln\left(\frac{\Lambda^2}{m_Q^2}\right) \right]^2\,   \left\vert g\left(2;\Lambda\right)\right\vert^2\, \times\left(1.98 \times 10^{-48}\right)\, {\rm cm^2}
\label{ScattTwistVDM}
\end{eqnarray}
\end{subequations}
where $\mu_{N\,{\rm DM}}\equiv \left(m_N\,m_{\rm DM}\right) /\, \left(m_N+m_{\rm DM}\right)$ is the reduced mass for  the respective  DM-nucleon system.  For the computation of scale dependent   $\alpha_s\left(\mu_R\right)$ and $g\left(x;\mu_R\right)$, we access    CTEQ6l1~\cite{Pumplin:2002vw} PDF data set  from LHAPDF6 ~\cite{Buckley:2014ana} library.
However, the scale dependence of the Wilson coefficients is found to be smaller than that of $\alpha_s$, as noted by the authors of the reference \cite{Belyaev:2018pqr}. It is to be noted that the observed logarithmically enhanced one-loop induced scattering cross-sections in equations \eqref{ScattTwistMDM}, \eqref{ScattTwistSDM} and \eqref{ScattTwistVDM} result from the explicit momentum dependence in the twist-2 operator interaction Lagrangian given in equations \eqref{MDMLag}, \eqref{SDMLag} and \eqref{VDMLag} respectively. The real vector DM-nucleon scattering cross-sections driven by the scalar and twist-2 type-2 currents of heavy quarks  in equations \eqref{ScattScalVDM} and \eqref{ScattTwistVDM} respectively   are found to be 1/3 of the scalar DM-nucleon scattering cross-sections corresponding to scalar and twist-2 type-2 currents of heavy-quarks in equations  \eqref{ScattScalSDM} and  \eqref{ScattTwistSDM} respectively. The velocity suppressed spin-dependent DM-nucleon scattering events induced by the pesudo-scalar operators are not analysed.
\begin{figure}[h!]
	\centering
\hspace{-0.5cm}
  \begin{subfigure}{0.5\textwidth}
      \centering
	\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{Figures/DDBotSDMXsec.pdf}
      \caption{}	\label{fig:DDSDMb}
  \end{subfigure}%
\hspace{0.1cm}
  \begin{subfigure}{0.5\textwidth}
      \centering
	\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{Figures/DDTopSDMXsec.pdf}
      \caption{}	\label{fig:DDSDMt}
  \end{subfigure}%
  \\
    \begin{subfigure}{0.5\textwidth}
      \centering
	\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{Figures/DDGluonSDMXsec.pdf}
      \caption{}	\label{fig:DDSDMg}
  \end{subfigure}%
	\caption{\em{Figures \ref{fig:DDSDMb}, \ref{fig:DDSDMb} and \ref{fig:DDSDMg} depict the  spin-independent $b$-quark-philic, $t$-quark-philic and gluon-philic scalar DM-nucleon  scattering cross-sections respectively. The scalar and twist-2 type-2 contributions in all the panels  are evaluated using their respective  lower bounds on  $  \left\vert C^{q,\,g}_{\phi^0_{S,\,T_2}}/\, \Lambda^n\right\vert$ satisfying  $\Omega^{\phi^0} h^2$ = $0.1199\pm 0.0022$  \cite{Aghanim:2018eyx} as shown in figures \ref{fig:RelicScalDM}  and hence, regions above the solid curves  are cosmologically allowed. Regions above the experimental limits obtained from XENON-1T~\cite{XENON:2018voc} and PandaX-4T\cite{PandaX-4T:2021bab} are excluded.}}
	\label{fig:DDSDMX}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[h!]
	\centering
\hspace{-0.5cm}
  \begin{subfigure}{0.5\textwidth}
      \centering
	\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{Figures/DDBotVDMXsec.pdf}
      \caption{}	\label{fig:DDVDMb}
  \end{subfigure}%
\hspace{0.1cm}
  \begin{subfigure}{0.5\textwidth}
      \centering
	\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{Figures/DDTopVDMXsec.pdf}
      \caption{}	\label{fig:DDVDMt}
  \end{subfigure}%
  \\
    \begin{subfigure}{0.5\textwidth}
      \centering
	\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{Figures/DDGluonVDMXsec.pdf}
      \caption{}	\label{fig:DDVDMg}
  \end{subfigure}%
	\caption{\em{Figures \ref{fig:DDVDMb}, \ref{fig:DDVDMb} and \ref{fig:DDVDMg} depict the  spin-independent $b$-quark-philic, $t$-quark-philic and gluon-philic vector DM-nucleon  scattering cross-sections respectively. The scalar and twist-2 type-2 contributions in all the panels  are evaluated using their respective  lower bounds on  $  \left\vert C^{q,\,g}_{V^0_{S,\,T_2}}/\, \Lambda^n\right\vert$ satisfying  $\Omega^{V^0} h^2$ = $0.1199\pm 0.0022$  \cite{Aghanim:2018eyx} as shown in figures \ref{fig:RelicVectDM}  and hence, regions above the solid curves  are cosmologically allowed. Regions above the experimental limits obtained from XENON-1T~\cite{XENON:2018voc} and PandaX-4T\cite{PandaX-4T:2021bab} are excluded.}}
	\label{fig:DDVDMX}
\end{figure}

\par For completion, we compute and display the tree-level spin-independent Majorana DM-nucleon, scalar DM-nucleon, and vector DM-nucleon scattering cross-sections induced by the scalar and twist-2 current of gluons in equations \eqref{gScattScalMDM}-\eqref{gScattTwistMDM}, \eqref{gScattScalSDM}-\eqref{gScattTwistSDM} and \eqref{gScattScalVDM}-\eqref{gScattTwistVDM}   respectively as
\begin{subequations}
\begin{eqnarray}
\sigma^{g^{\chi N}}_{S}
&=&\frac{128}{81}\frac{1}{\pi} \left(C_{\chi_S}^g\right)^2\left[ \frac{1\, {\rm TeV}}{\Lambda}\right]^8\,\left[\frac{m_\chi}{100\, {\rm GeV}}\right]^2\left[\frac{m_N}{1\, {\rm GeV}}\right]^2\left[\frac{\mu_{N\chi}}{1\,{\rm GeV}}\right]^2\,\nonumber\\
&&\,\,\,\times\,\,\left[\frac{\alpha_s\left(\Lambda\right)}{\alpha_s\left(\mu\right)}\right]^2   \left\vert f^N_{\rm TG}\right\vert^2 \times\left(3.9\times 10^{-48}\right)\, {\rm cm}^{2}\nonumber\\
\label{gScattScalMDM}
\end{eqnarray}
\begin{eqnarray}
\sigma^{g^{\chi N}}_{T_1}
&=&\frac{9}{8}\frac{1}{\pi} \left(C_{\chi_{T_1}}^g\right)^2\left[ \frac{1\, {\rm TeV}}{\Lambda}\right]^8\,\left[\frac{m_\chi}{100\, {\rm GeV}}\right]^2\left[\frac{m_N}{1\, {\rm GeV}}\right]^2\left[\frac{\mu_{N\chi}}{1\,{\rm GeV}}\right]^2\,\nonumber\\
&&\,\,\,\,\times\,\,\left\vert g\left(2;\,\mu_F\right)\right\vert^2 \times \left(3.9\times 10^{-48}\right)\, {\rm cm}^{2}\nonumber\\\label{gScattTwistMDM}
\end{eqnarray}
\end{subequations}

\begin{subequations}
\begin{eqnarray}
\sigma^{g^{\phi^0 N}}_{S}
&=&\frac{64}{81}\,\frac{1}{\pi} \left(C_{\phi^0_S}^g\right)^2\left[ \frac{1\, {\rm TeV}}{\Lambda}\right]^4\,\left[ \frac{100\, {\rm GeV}}{m_{\phi^0}}\right]^2\left[\frac{m_N}{1\, {\rm GeV}}\right]^2\left[\frac{\mu_{N\phi^0}}{1\,{\rm GeV}}\right]^2\,\left[\frac{\alpha_s\left(\Lambda\right)}{\alpha_s\left(\mu\right)}\right]^2 \nonumber\\
&&\,\,\,\,\times  \left\vert f^N_{\rm TG}\right\vert^2 \left(3.9 \times 10^{-44}\right)\, {\rm cm}^{2}\label{gScattScalSDM}\end{eqnarray}
\begin{eqnarray}
\sigma^{g^{\phi^0 N}}_{T_2}
&=& \frac{9}{32\pi}\, \left(C^g_{\phi^0_{T_2}}\right)^2 \bigg[\frac{1\, {\rm TeV}}{\Lambda}\bigg]^8\, \bigg[\frac{\alpha_s(\Lambda)}{4 \pi}\bigg]^2\, \left[\frac{\mu_{N\phi^0}}{1\, {\rm GeV}}\right]^2\, \left[\frac{m_{\phi^0}}{100\, {\rm GeV}}\right]^2\, \left[\frac{m_N}{1\, {\rm GeV}}\right]^2\, \nonumber\\
&&\,\,\,\, \times \left\vert g(2;\mu_F)\right\vert^2\, \left(3.9 \times 10^{-48}\right)\, {\rm cm^2}  \label{gScattTwistSDM}
\end{eqnarray}
\end{subequations}
\begin{subequations}
\begin{eqnarray}
\sigma^{g^{V^0 N}}_{S}
&=&\frac{64}{243}\,\frac{1}{\pi} \left(C_{V^0_S}^g\right)^2\left[ \frac{1\, {\rm TeV}}{\Lambda}\right]^4\,\left[ \frac{100\, {\rm GeV}}{m_{V^0}}\right]^2\left[\frac{m_N}{1\, {\rm GeV}}\right]^2\left[\frac{\mu_{NV^0}}{1\,{\rm GeV}}\right]^2\,\left[\frac{\alpha_s\left(\Lambda\right)}{\alpha_s\left(\mu\right)}\right]^2 \nonumber\\
&&\,\,\,\,\times  \left\vert f^N_{\rm TG}\right\vert^2 \left(3.9 \times 10^{-44}\right)\, {\rm cm}^{2}\label{gScattScalVDM}\end{eqnarray}
\begin{eqnarray}
\sigma^{g^{V^0 N}}_{T_2}
&=& \frac{3}{32\pi}\, \left(C^g_{V^0_{T_2}}\right)^2 \bigg[\frac{1\, {\rm TeV}}{\Lambda}\bigg]^8\, \bigg[\frac{\alpha_s(\Lambda)}{4 \pi}\bigg]^2\, \left[\frac{\mu_{NV^0}}{1\, {\rm GeV}}\right]^2\, \left[\frac{m_{V^0}}{100\, {\rm GeV}}\right]^2\, \left[\frac{m_N}{1\, {\rm GeV}}\right]^2\, \nonumber\\
&&\,\,\,\, \times \left\vert g(2;\mu_F)\right\vert^2\, \left(3.9 \times 10^{-48}\right)\, {\rm cm^2}  \label{gScattTwistVDM}
\end{eqnarray}
\end{subequations}
The analytical expressions for the gluon-philic DM-nucleon scattering cross-sections are in agreement with those given in reference \cite{Hisano:2015bma}.

\par We display the  Majorana, real scalar and real vector  DM-nucleon scattering cross-sections {\it w.r.t.} DM mass in  figures \ref{fig:DDMDMX}, \ref{fig:DDSDMX} and \ref{fig:DDVDMX} respectively.
 The scalar and twist-2 currents induced by $b$-quark-philic and $t$-quark-philic DM interactions are depicted in the left and right panels of all the three figures. Since, the cross-sections are evaluated using the lower bound on  the Wilson coefficients obtained from the relic density contours satisfying  $\Omega^{\rm DM} h^2$ in figures \ref{fig:RelicFermDM}, \ref{fig:RelicScalDM} and \ref{fig:RelicVectDM} for the Majorana, scalar and vector DM  respectively, the solid curves represent the cosmological lower-limits of the scattering cross-sections and therefore the regions above the curves shall be considered for the validation from the XENON-1T \cite{XENON:2018voc} and PandaX-4T \cite{PandaX-4T:2021bab}.

\par The spin-dependent DM-nucleon cross-section is suppressed by the fourth power of the momentum exchanged $\propto v_{\rm DM}^4$ as a result of the DM-gluon effective pseudo-scalar Lagrangian generated by the axial-vector coupling of Majorana/Vector DM to heavy quarks. The scattering cross-sections given in equations  \eqref{ScattAVMDM} and \eqref{ScattAVVDM} however, are compared with the upper-limits on the spin-dependent scattering cross-sections \cite{PICO:2019vsc}. The contribution of velocity independent  spin dependent DM-nucleon scattering cross-sections can be validated  from IceCube and PICO experiments using the $b\,\bar b$ channel  annihilation data as depicted  in figure 2   of reference \cite{IceCube:2019lus}.  We find that the  cosmologically constrained   Majorana and real vector  DM candidates interacting through  axial-vector currents of third generation heavy quarks are allowed by the available data for spin dependent scattering cross-sections.

\subsubsection{Nuclear Recoil Spectrum}
 \label{recoil}
 For   a fixed target detector exposure  $\epsilon_T$ and target  nucleus  mass $m_{\rm nuc.}$, the differential nuclear recoil event rate {\it w.r.t.} nuclear recoil energy $dR_{\rm nuc.}/ dE_r$  corresponding to the DM-nucleon scattering cross-section $\sigma_N$ and DM velocity $\left\vert \vec v\right\vert$   is given as
\begin{eqnarray}
	\frac{dR_{\rm nuc.}}{dE_{\rm r}} &=&  \frac{\epsilon_T\,\rho_0}{m_{\rm nuc.}\ m_{\rm DM}}\ \int_{\left\vert\vec v\right\vert_{\rm min}}^{\left\vert \vec v_{\rm esc}\right\vert }\,\left\vert \vec v\right\vert f\left(\left\vert \vec v\right\vert\right)\ \frac{d\sigma}{dE_{\rm r}}\ d\left\vert \vec v\right\vert \nonumber\\
	&&\,\,\,\, =   \frac{\epsilon_T\,\rho_{\rm DM}}{2\, m_{\rm DM}}\, \frac{\sigma_N\, A^2}{\mu^2_N}\ \left\vert F\left(\left\vert\vec q\right\vert\,r_n\right)\right\vert^2\,\displaystyle \int_{ \left\vert \vec v\right\vert_{\rm min}}^{\left\vert \vec v\right\vert_{\rm max}} \frac{1}{\left\vert \vec v_{\rm DM}\right\vert}\,f\left(\left\vert \vec v\right\vert\right)\,\, d^3 \vec v
\label{Rate}
\end{eqnarray}
where $F\left(\left\vert\vec q\right\vert\,r_n\right)$  is the Helm form factor taking account of the non-vanishing finite size of the nucleus \cite{Helm:1956zz}. Here $r_n \equiv 1.2\times A^{1/3}$  is the effective radius of the nucleus with atomic mass $A$  and $\left\vert\vec q\right\vert$ is the momentum transfer corresponding to the recoil energy $E_r$.
Following reference \cite{Lewin:1995rx}, the  velocity integral for normalized  Maxwellian DM velocity distribution is solved as
\begin{subequations}
\begin{eqnarray}
	&&\displaystyle\int_{\left\vert \vec v\right\vert_{\rm min}}^{\left\vert \vec v\right\vert_{\rm max}} \frac{f\left(\left\vert \vec v\right\vert\right)}{\left\vert \vec v\right\vert}\, d^3 \vec v =
	\displaystyle\int_{\sqrt{m_{\rm nuc.}\, E_r/\left(2\, \mu^2_{\rm nuc.}\right)}}^{\left\vert \vec v_{\rm esc}\right\vert} \frac{1}{\left\vert \vec v\right\vert}e^{-\left[  (\left\vert \vec v + \vec v_E\right\vert)/\,\left\vert \vec v_0\right\vert \right]^2} d^3\vec v \nonumber\\
	&&\,\,\,\,= \frac{1}{2\,  \left\vert\vec v_E\right\vert}\, {\rm erf}(\eta_-,\eta_+) - \frac{1}{\pi\, \left\vert \vec v_E\right\vert}\, (\eta_+ - \eta_-)\, e^{-\left[\left\vert \vec v_{\rm esc}\right\vert/ \left\vert\vec v_0\right\vert\right]^2}\hskip 0.5 cm {\rm where}\\
	&& \eta_\pm = \min\left[ \frac{\sqrt{m_{\rm nuc.}\, E_r/\left(2 \,\mu^2_{\rm nuc.}\right)}\pm \left\vert \vec v_E\right\vert}{\left\vert \vec v_0\right\vert}, \frac{\left\vert \vec v_{\rm esc}\right\vert }{\left\vert \vec v_0\right\vert} \right]\hskip 0.1 cm {\rm and} \hskip 0.1 cm \mu_{\rm nuc.}\equiv \frac{m_{\rm DM}\,m_{\rm nuc.}}{m_{\rm DM}+m_{\rm nuc.}}\nonumber\\
\end{eqnarray}
\end{subequations}
For numerical computation we have taken   Earth's velocity relative to galactic frame to be $\left\vert \vec v_E\right\vert$ = 232 km/ sec, $\left\vert\vec v_0\right\vert $ = 220 km/s and the escape velocity $\left\vert\vec v_{\rm esc}\right\vert$ = 544 km/s. Further, in order to incorporate the detector based effects, the nucleus recoil events rate $dR_{\rm nuc.}/\,dE_{r}$ is convoluted with the detector efficiency \cite{XENON:2018voc}. Integrating  over the recoil energy from $E_{\rm th} \sim$ 4.9 KeV to the maximum $E_{\rm max}$ for a fixed duration and size of the detector, we can estimate the expected  recoil nucleus events.
\begin{figure}[h!]
	\centering
\hspace{-0.5cm}
  \begin{subfigure}{0.5\textwidth}
      \centering
	\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{Figures/RecoilDDMDMEvents.pdf}
      \caption{}	\label{fig:RecoilDDMDM}
  \end{subfigure}%
\hspace{0.1cm}
  \begin{subfigure}{0.5\textwidth}
      \centering
	\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{Figures/RecoilDDSDMEvents.pdf}
      \caption{}	\label{fig:RecoilDDSDM}
  \end{subfigure}%
  \\
  \begin{subfigure}{0.5\textwidth}
      \centering
	\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{Figures/RecoilDDVDMEvents.pdf}
      \caption{}	\label{fig:RecoilDDVDM}
  \end{subfigure}%
  	\caption{\em{ Figures \ref{fig:RecoilDDMDM}, \ref{fig:RecoilDDSDM} and \ref{fig:RecoilDDVDM}  depict the  spin-independent   recoiled nucleus event  due to Majorana DM - Xe nucleus, scalar DM - Xe nucleus and vector DM - Xe nucleus scatterings respectively.  The scalar and twist-2   interactions  of $b$-quark, $t$-quark and gluon  in all the three panels  are evaluated using their respective  lower bounds on $  \left\vert C^{q,\,g}_{\chi_{S, \,T_1}}/\, \Lambda^n\right\vert$, $\left\vert C^{q,\,g}_{\phi^0_{S, \,T_2}}/\, \Lambda^n\right\vert$ and $\left\vert C^{q,\,g}_{V^0_{S, \,T_2}}/\, \Lambda^n\right\vert$ satisfying  $\Omega^{\rm DM} h^2$ = $0.1199\pm 0.0022$  \cite{Aghanim:2018eyx} as shown in figures \ref{fig:RelicFermDM}, \ref{fig:RelicScalDM} and \ref{fig:RelicVectDM} respectively and hence, regions above the solid curves  are cosmologically allowed. Shaded region is excluded due to non-observation of at least one-event in the XENON-1T experiment.}}
	\label{fig:DDRecoilEvents}
\end{figure}
\par As an illustration, we plot the probable number of Xe nuclear recoil events {\it w.r.t.} varying DM mass in a XENON-1T \cite{XENON:2018voc} setup where 1.3 tonnes of Xe target are exposed for a duration of 278.8 days, which is equivalent to one Ton-year of net target exposure. The expected number of recoil nucleus  events due to Majorana DM-Xe nucleus scattering,  scalar DM-Xe nucleus scattering and vector DM-Xe nucleus scattering, respectively, are depicted in figures \ref{fig:RecoilDDMDM}, \ref{fig:RecoilDDSDM} and \ref{fig:RecoilDDVDM}, which are induced by scalar and twist-2 currents of heavy quarks at one loop level and of gluons at tree level. Since the solid curves in both figures correspond to the lower-limits of the expected number of recoil nucleus events for a given DM mass, the region above the respective curves is cosmologically allowed.

 \par The absence of at least one event in the XENON-1T experiment rules out the contributions of $b$-quark-philic and gluon-philic Majorana DM scalar interactions for $m_ \chi \le$ 1.8 and 1.3 TeV, respectively, as shown in figure \ref{fig:RecoilDDMDM}. Barring the said two operators, we find  that  contributions from all other operators pertaining to Majorana, scalar and vector DM for $m_{\rm DM}\ge $ 200 GeV   may be  probed in the ongoing and future direct-detection experiments with enhanced target exposure.

\section{Summary and conclusions} \label{summary}
 \begin{figure}[h!]
	\centering
\hspace{-0.5cm}
  \begin{subfigure}{0.5\textwidth}
      \centering
	\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{Figures/ComboMDMScalOps.pdf}
      \caption{}	\label{fig:ComboMDMScal}
  \end{subfigure}%
  \begin{subfigure}{0.5\textwidth}
      \centering
	\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{Figures/ComboMDMTwistOps.pdf}
      \caption{}	\label{fig:ComboMDMTwist}
  \end{subfigure}%
  \caption{\em{Figures \ref{fig:ComboMDMScal} and \ref{fig:ComboMDMTwist} corresponding to scalar and twist-2 type-1 operators induced  interactions  depict the allowed range of the Wilson coefficients in red, blue and green   for the $b$-quark-philic, $t$-quark-philic and gluon-philic Majorana DM respectively.
  The shaded region enclosed by the lower-limit and upper-limit contours of Wilson coefficients $  \left\vert C^{q,\,g}_{\chi_{S, \,T_1}}/\, \Lambda^n\right\vert$ satisfy the relic density constraint $\Omega^{\chi} h^2$ = $0.1199\pm 0.0022$  \cite{Aghanim:2018eyx} and non-observation of at least  one-event in XENON-1T experiment ~\cite{XENON:2018voc} respectively.}}
	\label{fig:MDMCombined}
\end{figure}

In this article we assess the viability of the $b$-quark-philic, $t$-quark-philic, and gluon-philic self-conjugated spin 1/2, 0 and 1 DM  candidates in the EFT approach. We have formulated the generalised effective interaction Lagrangian induced by the scalar, pseudo-scalar, axial-vector, and twist-2 operators for the real particles in section \ref{model}.
\begin{figure}[h!]
    \begin{subfigure}{0.5\textwidth}
	\includegraphics[scale=0.49]{Figures/ComboSDMScalOps.pdf}
      \caption{}	\label{fig:ComboSDMScal}
  \end{subfigure}%
 \begin{subfigure}{0.5\textwidth}
	\includegraphics[scale=0.49]{Figures/ComboSDMTwistOps.pdf}
      \caption{}	\label{fig:ComboSDMTwist}
  \end{subfigure}%
  \caption{\em{Figures \ref{fig:ComboSDMScal} and \ref{fig:ComboSDMTwist} corresponding to scalar and twist-2 type-2 operators induced  interactions  depict the allowed range of the Wilson coefficients in red, blue and green   for the $b$-quark-philic, $t$-quark-philic and gluon-philic scalar DM respectively.
  The shaded region enclosed by the lower-limit and upper-limit contours of Wilson coefficients $  \left\vert C^{q,\,g}_{\phi^0_{S, \,T_2}}/\, \Lambda^n\right\vert$ satisfy the relic density constraint $\Omega^{\phi^0} h^2$ = $0.1199\pm 0.0022$  \cite{Aghanim:2018eyx} and the non-observation of at least  one-event in XENON-1T experiment ~\cite{XENON:2018voc} respectively.}}
	\label{fig:SDMCombined}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[h!]
	\centering
\hspace{-0.5cm}

    \begin{subfigure}{0.5\textwidth}
      \centering
	\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{Figures/ComboVDMScalOps.pdf}
      \caption{}	\label{fig:ComboVDMScal}
  \end{subfigure}%
 \begin{subfigure}{0.5\textwidth}
      \centering
	\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{Figures/ComboVDMTwistOps.pdf}
      \caption{}	\label{fig:ComboVDMTwist}
  \end{subfigure}%
  \caption{\em{Figures \ref{fig:ComboVDMScal} and \ref{fig:ComboVDMTwist} corresponding to scalar and twist-2 type-2 operators induced  interactions  depict the allowed range of the Wilson coefficients in red, blue and green   for the $b$-quark-philic, $t$-quark-philic and gluon-philic vector DM respectively.  The shaded region enclosed by the lower-limit and upper-limit contours of Wilson coefficients $  \left\vert C^{q,\,g}_{V^0_{S, \,T_2}}/\, \Lambda^n\right\vert$ satisfy the relic density constraint $\Omega^{V^0} h^2$ = $0.1199\pm 0.0022$  \cite{Aghanim:2018eyx} and the non-observation of at least  one-event in XENON-1T experiment ~\cite{XENON:2018voc} respectively.}}
	\label{fig:VDMCombined}
\end{figure}
\par For a given DM mass, the relic abundance of Majorana, scalar, and vector DM is computed in section \ref{relic} using the thermally averaged cross-sections in appendix \ref{TherAvgCS}. Figures  \ref{fig:RelicFermDM}, \ref{fig:RelicScalDM} and \ref{fig:RelicVectDM}  show twenty-eight interaction strengths in the form of Wilson coefficients $  \left\vert C^{q,\,g}_{{\rm DM}_i\,O_j}/\, \Lambda^n\right\vert$ in TeV$^{-n}$ (eleven for Majorana DM, six for scalar DM and eleven for vector DM) satisfying the relic density constraint  $\Omega^{\rm DM} h^2$ $\approx$ 0.1198 \cite{Aghanim:2018eyx}.

\par Using the constrained Wilson coefficients, we  study the thermal averaged DM pair annihilation cross-sections for the indirect detection of varying DM masses ($10^{-1}$ - 2 TeV)  in figures \ref{fig:IDFermDM}, \ref{fig:IDScalDM} and \ref{fig:IDVectDM}. The contributions to the lower limits on the annihilation cross-sections to $b\, \bar b$, $t\,\bar t$ and $g\,g$ channels driven by  the effective couplings are found to be consistent when compared   with  the upper limit on the $b\,\bar b$ annihilation cross-section obtained from  FermiLAT~\cite{Ackermann:2015zua} and H.E.S.S.~\cite{Abdallah:2016ygi} indirect experiments. The predicted annihilation cross-sections for all the twenty-eight operators are found to be consistent with the available data from indirect-detection experiments.

\par The  scattering of the incident heavy-quark-philic  DM particle  off the static nucleon  induced by the effective one loop-interactions of the  Majorana / scalar / vector DM  with gluons in the direct-detection experiments are studied. The contributions of gluon-philic Majorana, scalar and vector DM are revisited and found to be in agreement with results in the literature \cite{Hisano:2015bma}. The lower limits of the scattering cross-sections for the dominant spin-independent processes due to scalar and twist currents for Majorana, scalar DM and vector DM are shown in  figures \ref{fig:DDMDMX}, \ref{fig:DDSDMX} and \ref{fig:DDVDMX}  respectively and are compared with the available results  from XENON-1T~\cite{XENON:2018voc} and PandaX-4T \cite{PandaX-4T:2021bab}. Further, using the lower limits on the Wilson coefficients, the expected number of recoil nucleus events due to   Majorana, scalar and vector DM-nucleon scattering in the XENON-1T experiment  are shown in figures  \ref{fig:RecoilDDMDM}, \ref{fig:RecoilDDSDM}  and \ref{fig:RecoilDDVDM}, respectively for an equivalent target exposure of 1 Ton-year.

\par Finally,  figures \ref{fig:MDMCombined}, \ref{fig:SDMCombined} and \ref{fig:VDMCombined}  corresponding to real spin 1/2, 0 and 1 DM candidates respectively encapsulate the predicted range  for the eighteen Wilson coefficients associated with scalar and twist-2 operators  where the cosmological relic density \cite{Aghanim:2018eyx} and the non-observation of at least  one-event in XENON-1T direct-detection experiment \cite{XENON:2018voc} give the lower and upper bounds for varying DM mass $\sim 0.01 \le m_{\rm DM}\le$ 2 TeV respectively. Findings of our analysis are summarised as follows:
\begin{itemize}
	\item Contributions from $b$-quark-philic, $t$-quark-philic, and gluon-philic Majorana DM scalar operators are found to be viable solutions for $m_\chi\ge $ 1.8 TeV, 200 GeV, and 1.25 TeV, respectively, as shown in figure \ref{fig:ComboMDMScal}. The contributions of $b$-quark-philic, $t$-quark-philic, and gluon-philic twist-2 type-1 Majorana DM operators shown in figure \ref{fig:ComboMDMTwist} have been validated for a much wider spectrum of $m_\chi\ge$ 60 GeV, 200 GeV, and 200 GeV, respectively.
\item In figure \ref{fig:ComboSDMScal} contributions from $b$-quark-philic, $t$-quark-philic and gluon-philic scalar DM scalar operators are found to be consistent with current experimental data for $m_{\phi^0}\ge $ 350 GeV, 200 GeV and 350 GeV, respectively. The corresponding  contributions  induced by twist-2 type-2  DM operators are  validated for $m_{\phi^0}\ge $ 150 GeV, 200 GeV and 280 GeV, respectively as shown in the  figure \ref{fig:ComboSDMTwist} .
	\item In figure \ref{fig:ComboVDMScal} contributions from $b$-quark-philic, $t$-quark-philic and gluon-philic vector DM scalar operators are validated for $m_{V^0}\ge$ 350 GeV, 180 GeV and 350 GeV, respectively. The corresponding contributions induced by twist-2 type-2 DM operators are  validated for $m_{V^0}\ge $ 100 GeV, 180 GeV and 200 GeV, respectively as shown in figure \ref{fig:ComboVDMTwist} .
\end{itemize}

\par This analysis shows that the third-generation heavy-quark-philic and gluon-philic real DM are promising for $m_{\rm DM}\ge $ 200 GeV and are likely to be probed and falsified otherwise in the ongoing and future upgraded direct detection experiments. This study also opens up the scope    for future collider based DM search analysis through additional channels induced by the cosmologically  constrained operators.

\bigskip
\acknowledgments
We thank Abhaya Kumar Swain, Debajyoti Choudhury  and Manvinder Pal Singh for  fruitful discussions. We acknowledge the partial financial support from core research grant CRG/2018/004889 SERB, Government  of India. LKS acknowledges the UGC SRF fellowship for the partial financial support.

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology (hep-ph)