On the origin of two-shell supernova remnants

Abstract: The proper motion of massive stars could cause them to explode far from the geometric centers of their wind-driven bubbles and thereby could affect the symmetry of the resulting diffuse supernova remnants. We use this fact to explain the origin of SNRs consisting of two partially overlapping shells (e.g. Cygnus Loop, 3C 400.2, etc.).

\section{Introduction}

The SNRs consisting of two partially overlapping nonthermal shells
represent a significant fraction of the known shell-like SNRs.
Several explanations were put forward to explain the unusual
morphology of these objects: {\it i}) superposition of two separate
SNRs; {\it ii}) collision of two separate SNRs (e.g. Uyaniker et al.
2002); {\it iii}) breakout phenomenon in a region with a density
discontinuity (e.g. Vel\'{a}zquez et al. 2001). We propose an
alternative explanation based on the idea that the two-shell SNRs
can be products of an off-centered supernova (SN) explosion in a
preexisting bubble created by the wind of a moving massive star.

\section{Precursors of two-shell SNRs}

Massive stars (the progenitors of most of SNe) are the sources of
strong stellar wind, which creates extended (tens of parsecs)
bubbles in the interstellar medium. In the absence of stellar proper
motion, the wind bubbles blown-up in the homogeneous medium are
spherically-symmetric with the star at the center of symmetry.
However, after correction for galactic rotation, all stars have a
proper motion. Most of the massive stars have a peculiar velocity of
a few km/s; some of them have much larger velocities. The stellar
proper motion could result in a considerable offset of the SN
explosion site from the center of the wind-driven bubble, while the
initially spherical shape of the bubble could be significantly
distorted if the star reaches the edge of the bubble and the stellar
wind starts to interact directly with the ambient interstellar
medium (Weaver et al. 1977; see Fig.~1 for schematic illustration of
this effect).

\begin{figure}[h]

\centering
\caption{Schematic illustration of the effect of stellar motion on
the structure of a wind bubble. At early times (A) the small circle
corresponds to a shock separating freely expanding stellar wind from
the region of shocked wind. The large circle corresponds to the
shock separating the unperturbed interstellar gas from the swept-up
(shocked) interstellar gas. (The contact discontinuity separating
the swept-up gas from the shocked wind is omitted for the sake of
simplicity.) At advanced times (B) the stellar wind interacts
directly with the ambient interstellar medium.} \label{fig1}
\end{figure}

It is likely that just this situation takes place in the case of the
progenitor star of the SN~1987A. Wang et al. (1993) suggested that
the large-scale structure to the southeast of SN~1987A (the dark bay
in their Fig.~2) is the wind-driven bubble created by the moving SN
progenitor star during the main-sequence (MS) stage, while the
Napoleon's Hat nebula originates due to the interaction of the
post-MS winds with the ambient interstellar medium (see, however,
Sugerman et al. 2005).

\begin{figure}[h]

\centering
\caption{The continuum-subtracted ${\rm H}_{\alpha}$ mosaic of
RCW~86 (Smith 1997).} \label{fig3}
\end{figure}

After the massive star exploded as a SN, the SN blast wave takes on
the shape of the preexisting cavity (e.g. R\'{o}$\dot{z}$yczka et
al. 1993; Brighenti \& D'Ercole 1994; Gvaramadze \& Vikhlinin 2003)
and the resulting SNR becomes considerably
non-spherically-symmetric. Fig.~2 shows the ${\rm H}_{\alpha}$ image
(Smith 1997) of RCW~86 -- a shell-like SNR with a peculiar
protrusion to the southwest. We believe (Gvaramadze \& Vikhlinin
2003) that RCW~86 is an older version of the SN~1987A and that the
southwest protrusion is the remainder of a bow shock-like structure
created in the interstellar medium by the post-MS winds. Given the
youth of the SNR, we expect that the stellar remnant should still be
within the protrusion. Motivated by these arguments we searched for
a stellar remnant using the {\it Chandra} archival data and
discovered a neutron star candidate just in the "proper place"
(Gvaramadze \& Vikhlinin 2003).

\section{Two-shell SNRs}

We propose that a two-shell SNR is a natural consequence of an
off-centered cavity SN explosion of a moving massive star, which
ended its evolution near the edge of the MS wind-driven bubble. This
proposal implies that one of the shells is the former MS bubble
reenergized by the SN blast wave. The second shell, however, could
originate in two somewhat different ways, depending on the initial
mass of the SN progenitor star. It could be a shell swept-up by the
SN blast wave expanding through the unperturbed ambient interstellar
medium if the massive star ends its evolution as a red supergiant
(RSG), i.e. if the star evolves through the sequence: MS-RSG-SN. Or
it could be the remainder of a preexisting shell (adjacent to the MS
bubble) swept-up by the fast progenitor's wind during the late
evolutionary phases if after the RSG phase the star evolves through
the Wolf-Rayet (WR) phase (i.e. MS-RSG-WR-SN). In both cases the
resulting (two-shell) SNR should be associated only with one (young)
NS (cf. Gvaramadze 2006). We note several distinctions
characterizing the second case: (a) the birth-place of the stellar
remnant could be significantly offset from the center of the
preexisting WR shell due to the proper motion of the SN progenitor
star, (b) the SN explosion site could be marked by a nebula of
thermal X-ray emission (see Sect.\,4.2), and (c) the preexisting WR
shell causes the rapid evolution of the SN blast wave from the
adiabatic phase to the radiative one.

\section{Two examples}

\subsection{Cygnus Loop (MS-RSG-SN)}

\begin{figure}[h]

\centering
\caption{Two shells of the Cygnus Loop: {\it ROSAT} image at 0.25
keV with overlaid polarization intensity contours (Uyaniker et al.
2002). A neutron star candidate (Miyata et al. 2001) is indicated by
a cross.} \label{fig5}
\end{figure}

The polarized intensity image of the Cygnus Loop by Uyaniker et al.
(2002) shows a prominent shell-like structure encompassing the
"break-out" region in the south of this SNR (see Fig.~3). The
geometric center of the shell nearly coincides with a neutron star
candidate discovered in X-rays by Miyata et al. (2001; indicated in
Fig.~3 by a cross). Uyaniker et al. (2002) believe that the Cygnus
Loop is actually two individual SNRs interacting with each other. An
alternative possibility is that the Cygnus Loop is the result of SN
explosion near the south edge of a cavity blown up by the SN
progenitor during the MS stage and that the SN precursor was a RSG
star (Gvaramadze 2003). This implies that the north (well-known)
shell of the Cygnus Loop corresponds to the former MS bubble
reenergized by the SN blast wave, while the newly-discovered (south)
shell is created by the interaction of the SN blast wave with the
unperturbed interstellar medium. Accordingly, we expect that only
one stellar remnant should be associated with both shells.

\begin{figure}[h]

\centering
\caption{{\it ASCA} image of 3C~400.2 (Yoshita et al. 2001).
Overlaid contours are the VLA image at 1.4 GHZ (Dubner et al.
1994).} \label{fig6}
\end{figure}

\subsection{3C~400.2 (MS-RSG-WR-SN)}

The SNR 3C~400.2 consists of two circular radio shells with the
centrally-filled thermal X-ray emission peaked on the region where
the radio shells overlap each other (Fig.~4; Dubner et al. 1994;
Yoshita et al. 2001) and therefore belongs to the class of
mixed-morpology SNRs (i.e. shell-like in the radio and
centrally-filled in the X-ray; Rho \& Petre 1998). The origin of
mixed-morphology SNRs is usually treated in the framework of White
\& Long's (1991) model of evaporation of embedded interstellar
cloudlets. An alternative explanation of the origin of the
centrally-filled thermal X-ray emission is that it is due to the
evaporation of dense circumstellar clumps (produced by the
interaction of the fast WR wind with the preceding slow RSG one;
Gvaramadze 2001, 2002). We therefore suggest that the SN precursor
was a WR star and that the northwest shell of 3C~400.2 is the former
WR shell. This suggestion can be supported by the fact that the
northwest shell has a bilateral appearance with the bilateral axis
parallel to the Galactic plane (see Gvaramadze 2004). If our
suggestion is correct, then one can expect that the stellar remnant
associated with 3C~400.2 should be within the northwest shell.


The Magnetic Fields of the Quiet Sun

Abstract: This work reviews our understanding of the magnetic fields observed in the quiet Sun. The subject has undergone a major change during the last decade (quiet revolution), and it will remain changing since the techniques of diagnostic employed so far are known to be severely biased. Keeping these caveats in mind, our work covers the main observational properties of the quiet Sun magnetic fields: magnetic field strengths, unsigned magnetic flux densities, magnetic field inclinations, as well as the temporal evolution on short time-scales (loop emergence), and long time-scales (solar cycle). We also summarize the main theoretical ideas put forward to explain the origin of the quiet Sun magnetism. A final prospective section points out various areas of solar physics where the quiet Sun magnetism may have an important physical role to play (chromospheric and coronal structure, solar wind acceleration, and solar elemental abundances).

\section{The Quiet Revolution}

Our understanding of the quiet Sun magnetic fields has turned
up-side-down during the last decade. The quiet Sun was thought
to be basically non-magnetic, whereas according to the current views,
it is fully magnetized. So magnetic as to dominate the magnetic flux
and energy budget of the full Sun even during the maximum of the solar
cycle \citep{san02b,san04,tru04}.
Of course, quiet Sun magnetic fields are highly disorganized,
so that their detection is far more complicated than that of active regions,
which explains why they have been elusive for so long (see \S~\ref{origins}).
If one would have to identify a divide line for the transition,
we would choose
as landmark the numerical simulation by
\citet{cat99a}
\,It shows how the interplay between magnetic fields and surface
convection produces an extraordinary complex magnetic field  which,
despite its vigor, remains almost invisible to  observations
due to cancellations \citep{emo01}
The residuals left by such magnetic field, whose average field strength
exceeded
100~G, were perfectly consistent with observations of the Zeeman polarization
signals, the Hanle depolarization signals, and the Zeeman broadening
\citep{san03}. The presence of such intense magnetic field is now clearly
favored by observers
\citep[e.g.,][]{dom03a,tru04,lit08,pie09,jin09} and
theoreticians \citep[e.g.,][]{vog07,pie10}, with some notable
exceptions  \citep[e.g.,][]{spr10}. This sudden drastic change
in the way we perceive the quiet Sun can be appropriately called {\em
revolution},
as we state in the title of the section.
Most of the solar surface used to be non-magnetic whereas now it is magnetic.
A wealth of previously ignored magnetic structures have
entered into being. They participate in the solar activity processes,
and certainly  determine some of the global magnetic properties of the Sun
(see \S~\ref{importance}).
We dub the revolution {\em quiet} because it refers to the
quiet Sun but, more importantly, because
the profound change we are undergoing is seldom properly
acknowledged.  A proper acknowledging is basic for at least
two reasons.
(1) The study of the quiet Sun magnetic fields requires
upgrading of the traditional magnetometry
techniques, since all traditional approaches are prone
to serious bias (\S~\ref{tangling}).
(2) We have not reached the end of the change yet.
Our ideas are still in evolution, and we need to be prepared
for the necessary update in a short time-scale.

This paper aims at summarizing the main observational
properties of the quiet Sun magnetic fields.
However, the paper begins with the theoretical
ideas put forward to explain the origin of the quiet Sun
magnetic fields (\S~\ref{origins}).
The section comes first to set up the scene, i.e.,
to put forward the complicated magnetic field
to be expected from theoretical grounds.
It should be considered either as inspiration
for a proper diagnosis, or as a caveat to avoid
misinterpreting the observations. This admonitory section
is followed by a description of the observational biases to be
expected (\S~\ref{tangling}). We then address specific
properties of the quiet Sun magnetic fields: the distribution
of magnetic field strengths and
unsigned magnetic flux (\S~\ref{strength}),
the distribution of magnetic field inclinations
(\S~\ref{inclinations}), and the time evolution of the signals
on short time-scales (\S~\ref{time_loop}) and during the cycle
(\S~\ref{solar_cycle}). \S~\ref{tangling} also addresses the line
profile  asymmetries, whereas \S~\ref{time_loop} describes
the recent finding of loop emergence in the quiet Sun.
The final \S~\ref{importance} is devoted to
discuss various areas of solar physics where the quiet Sun
magnetism, traditionally neglected, may have an important physical
role to play.

\section{The Origin of the Quiet Sun Magnetic Fields}\label{origins}

To the best of our knowledge, three scenarios have been put forward
to explain the origin of the quiet Sun magnetic fields. They may be
debrids from decaying active regions \citep[e.g.,][]{spr87b}.
This possibility seems to be unlikely due to the large differences in
the time-scale and magnetic flux of active regions and the quiet Sun
\citep[][]{san03b,san09}.
Active regions vary on time-scales of 12 years as compared to
minutes, the time-scale characteristic of quiet Sun fields
\citep[e.g.,][ and \S~\ref{time_evol}]{lin99,zha98}.
There is also an order of magnitude difference in unsigned
magnetic flux in favor of the quiet Sun -- the active regions
present an unsigned flux density during solar maximum
of some 15~G \citep[e.g.,][]{har93,san03b} whereas
we will be defending some 1~hG for the quiet Sun
(see \S~\ref{strength}).
The second possibility is that quiet Sun fields
result from the operation of a turbulent dynamo driven
by the external convective layers
\citep{pet93,cat99a,vog07,pie10}.
Such dynamos seem to be unavoidable for a wide class of
chaotic flow fields -- see \citet{chi95,cat99b}.
The topology of the resulting magnetic field is very complex,
with mixed polarities coexisting up to the small
resistive scales, which in the solar photosphere are
smaller than 1~km \citep[e.g.,][]{sch86}.
Turbulent dynamos have a fast exponential growth rate,
comparable to the turn-over time-scale of the motions,
and the magnetic energy resides at
the smallest (resistive) spatial scales.
The magnetic energy $\langle B^2\rangle/(8\pi)$
is a significant fraction $\chi$ of the kinetic energy
that drives the dynamo $\langle\rho u^2\rangle/2$, so that
\begin{equation}
\langle B^2\rangle^{1/2}\simeq 130\,{\rm G},
\end{equation}
for an efficiency $\chi$ of 5\%,
assuming typical values for the granular motions at the base
of the photosphere \citep[density $\rho\simeq 3\times 10^{-7}$~g~cm$^{-3}$,
velocity $u\simeq 3$~km~s$^{-1}$; e.g.,][Fig.~5]{stei98}.
Turbulent dynamo magnetic
fields reproduce many observed properties
of the quiet Sun magnetism, although
this agreement is equally good if the complexity of the
magnetic field is not due to the dynamo action but to
the interaction of a preexisting
magnetic field with the granular
motions \citep[e.g.,][]{kho05b,stei06}. Because of this reason, and
to overcome difficulties of the first turbulent dynamo
simulations, \citet{ste02} proposed that the turbulent
dynamo is not confined to the surface but it operates in the
entire convection zone. Such conjecture represents the third
possibility for the origin of the quiet Sun magnetic fields
offered in the literature.

\section{Tangling and Observational Bias}\label{tangling}

As we mention above, the numerical simulations
predict a complex magnetic field, tangled
to unresolved scales, having all magnetic field strengths
(from 0 to 2\,kG\footnote{The upper limit is set
by average gas pressure at the base of the photosphere,
so that if this field strength is exceeded then the magnetized
plasma cannot be in mechanical balance within the photosphere,
and the imbalanced magnetic forces work to drop the field
strength in a short (Alfv\'en) crossing-time scale; $\sim 5\sec$
in a structure 50 km wide -- see, e.g., \citet{sch86}.})
and  all inclinations (from 0 to 180$^{\circ}$).
The tangling occurs at such small-scale that most circular
polarization signals disappear at the observed spatial
resolution \citep[e.g.,][]{emo01}. The most recent account of this
effect predicts that at least 80\% of the signals existing in the
turbulent dynamo simulations of \citet{vog07} are not observable at
0\farcs 3 \citep{pie09}, i.e., with the kind of best
resolution achieved nowadays
characteristic of the Hinode satellite \citep{kos07,tsu08}.
In addition to this cancellation,
many methods commonly used in Zeeman diagnostics
have been claimed to bear their own specific biases.
The measurements provide ill-defined
averages of the mean properties in the
resolution element, but the weighting depends on subtleties
of the method, including the used spectral line.
Among the claims in the literature, the polarization signals of
the near IR line Fe\,{\sc~I}~$\lambda$15648
weaken in kG magnetic concentrations smeared by
the vertical gradient of
magnetic field \citep{san00}, the Mn\,I lines with hyperfine
structure (HFS)
are very sensitive to temperature and they tend to
vanish in kG magnetic
concentrations \citep{san08b}, and the pair Fe\,{\sc i}~$\lambda$6301, 6302
cannot distinguish between kG-cold plasmas and hG-hot plasmas
\citep{mar06}.
The problem of spatial smearing is traditionally
overcome using Hanle effect induced depolarization
signals \citep[e.g.,][]{ste82,fau93,lan04}. In this case
a spatially unresolved randomly oriented
magnetic field still leaves a residual, that can be measured and
interpreted to infer magnetic properties. However,
the Hanle effect signals are not sensitive
above the so-called Hanle saturation field strength, which varies from
spectral line to spectral line, but which seldom exceeds 1\,hG.
Hanle signals are therefore inadequate for diagnosing field
strengths in the hG and kG regime.
Table~\ref{table_bias} lists these and other potential
biases pointed out in the literature,
with the original references included for the interested
reader to consult.
\begin{table}[!ht]
\caption{Biases when measuring quiet Sun fields as identified
in the literature}
\label{table_bias}
\smallskip
\begin{center}
{\small
\begin{tabular}{lccc}
\tableline
\noalign{\smallskip}
Spectral Line&Type$^\star$& Potential Bias &Reference\\
\noalign{\smallskip}
\tableline
\noalign{\smallskip}
All & Z&no polarization for  $B\ga 1.8$\,kG &[1] \\
Temperature sensitive &Z & weaken with increasing field strength &[2] \\
HFS Mn~{\sc i} lines &Z&weaken to disappearance in kG&[3]\\
Fe\,{\sc i}\,$\lambda$6301 \& 6302 & Z &cannot distinguish kG-cold plasmas &[4]\\
&&~~~~from hG-hot plasmas&\\
Fe\,{\sc i}\,$\lambda$6301 \& 6302 &Z& produce false kG when noisy & [5]\\
Fe\,{\sc i}\,$\lambda$15648&Z & magnetic gradients make it weaken in kG &[6]\\
All&H&saturated for $B \ga $ a few hG&[7]\\
Sr\,{\sc i}\,$\lambda$4607&H&the assumed distribution of $B$ &[8]\\
&&~~~~determines the mean field&\\
$C_2$ \& Sr\,{\sc i}\,$\lambda$4607&H&
inconsistent results&[9]\\
\tableline
\noalign{\smallskip}
\end{tabular}
$^\star$~Physical mechanism
responsible for the polarization: Z for
Zeeman effect, and H for Hanle
depolarization\hfill\break
[1]~\citet{san00c}\hfil
\hfill\citet{har69}~[2]\break
[3]~\citet{san08b}\hfil
\hfill\citet{mar06}~[4]\break
[5]~\citet{bel03}\hfill\break
[6]~\citet{san00,soc03}\hfill\break
[7]~\citet{ste82,lan04}\hfil
\hfill\citet{san05}~[8]\break
[9]~\citet{tru04}\hfill\break
}
\end{center}
\end{table}

Highly asymmetric Stokes profiles characterize the polarization
signals of the quiet Sun. Their mere presence provide a direct
model-independent indication of the complexity of the magnetic fields.
If our resolution elements were sufficient to resolve the magnetic
structure, so that the plasma properties could be regarded as
constant in the pixel, then Stokes~$V$ should be perfectly
antisymmetric with respect to the central wavelength of the line.
Such profiles are never observed.
\citet{sig99} and \citet{san00} found asymmetries in
observations with  1\arcsec\ angular resolution.
Rather than disappearing when improving the angular resolution, they become
more common and pronounced at the 0\farcs 32\ angular of Hinode
\citep{vit10a,vit10b}. Figure~\ref{asymmetries} illustrates the
type of observed asymmetries. It belongs to the work
by \citet{vit10b}, and shows all the classes of Stokes~$V$ profiles
of Fe\,{\sc i}\,$\lambda$6301 \& 6302 observed in the quiet Sun
with Hinode/SP.
\begin{figure}[!t]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{sanchez_gonzalez_f1.ps}
\caption{Classes of Stokes~$V$ profiles of Fe\,{\sc i}\,$\lambda$6301 \& 6302
observed in the quiet Sun with Hinode/SP \citep{vit10b}. None of the
profiles is antisymmetric, revealing  that spatially unresolved magnetic
structures are present throughout.
Asymmetries go from mild to extreme.
The solid lines correspond to the average profiles in the class,
whereas the percentages indicate the faction of observed profiles
belonging to the class.
Wavelengths increase to the right and are
given in pixels (of 21.5\,m\AA).
}
\label{asymmetries}
\end{figure}
The presence of net circular
polarization\footnote{The net circular polarization is the wavelength
integral of the Stokes~$V$ profile, and it is observed to differ
from zero.} in these profiles indicates that (part of) the
unresolved structures producing the asymmetries overlap
along the line-of-sight \citep[LOS; see ][]{san98c} and, therefore,
they have to be smaller than
the thickness of the photospheric layers where the lines are
formed  ($\la 100\,$km). Consequently,  resolving these structures
by brute force
(i.e., increasing the angular resolution of the  observation) is hopeless
since the gradients producing the asymmetries occur along the LOS.
Some of the observed Stokes~$V$ profiles present three lobes
revealing that these unresolved structures often have opposite polarities
\citep[][]{san00,vit10a}.

In short, the complications of the magnetic field in the
quiet Sun make all measurements prone to large bias.
A proper interpretation requires acknowledging the presence
of plasmas with different magnetic properties overlapping
along the LOS.

\section{Distribution of Magnetic Field Strengths and Unsigned Flux}
\label{strength}

Both theory and observations suggest a quiet Sun plasma
with a wide range of physical properties, therefore, it can
be best characterized using probability density functions (PDFs).
We will define the magnetic field strength PDF, $P(B)$, as
the probability that a point of the photosphere chosen at
random has a magnetic field strength $B$.
(For alternative ways of defining quiet Sun
PDFs, see, e.g., \citeauthor{stei03}~\citeyear{stei03},
\citeauthor{bom09}~\citeyear{bom09}.)
The function $P(B)$ cannot be measured directly -- the {\it points}
in the photosphere cannot be spatially resolved, therefore,
in order to infer $P(B)$ from histograms of observed $B$,
one must account for the spatial smearing and the biases
discussed in \S~\ref{tangling}. In spite of this disadvantage,
the definition is convenient since $P(B)$ is directly
predicted by the numerical simulations of magneto-convection
\citep[e.g.,][]{cat99a,vog05}. In addition, the two first moments
of a PDF thus defined have a direct and important physical interpretation:
the first moment $\langle B\rangle$ is connected with the
unsigned magnetic flux density in the quiet Sun,
whereas the second moment provides the magnetic energy
density of the quiet Sun
$\langle B^2\rangle/(8\pi)$,
\begin{equation}
\langle B\rangle=\int_0^\infty B\,P(B)\,dB,~~~~~~~~~~
\langle B^2\rangle=\int_0^\infty B^2\,P(B)\,dB.
\label{flux_energy_eq}
\end{equation}

From an observational viewpoint, the function $P(B)$ is still
fairly uncertain.
The many different estimates of magnetic field
strength existing in the literature seem to be inconsistent,
which can be probably pinned down to the biases introduced in the
measurements by the complications of the quiet Sun magnetic
fields (see \S~\ref{tangling}). However, despite the discrepancies,
there is a general consensus on a few general properties of
$P(B)$. All the quiet Sun is magnetic but with a weak
field strength -- inferior to, say, 1\,hG, but differring from
zero since $P(B)\rightarrow 0$ when $B\rightarrow 0$
\citep{dom06}.
In addition, the distribution $P(B)$ should present an
extended tail that goes all the way to the maximum
possible value at some 2\,kG. The three PDFs in Fig.~\ref{magpdfs}
illustrate the overall expected shape, as well as the
differences under discusion.
\citep[They have been derived following the
approximation by][but this fact is unimportant
for the sake of our argumentation.]{san07}
\begin{figure}[!t]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{sanchez_gonzalez_f2.ps}
\caption{Three magnetic field strength PDFs with
the expected shapes. They differ in the mean field (see
the inset), and on whether this mean field is mostly
provided by the weak fields (the dotted lines) or
has a strong contribution of the kG fields (the dashed line).
}
\label{magpdfs}
\end{figure}
The disagreement is in the (important) details, namely,
on the value of $\langle B\rangle$ and
on whether this $\langle B\rangle$ is mostly produced by
dG, hG or kG magnetic fields. The value of $\langle B\rangle$ determines
the importance of the quiet Sun magnetic fields
as compared with the classical manifestations
of the solar activity (active regions), whereas the
relative contribution of the various field strengths
decides the connectivity of the photospheric quiet Sun fields
with the rest of the solar atmosphere (see \S~\ref{importance}).

We  address the issue of the mean field first.
Figure~\ref{unsignedflux} shows measurements of
the mean unsigned vertical magnetic field, $\overline{|B_z|}$,
obtained by many different
groups with different instrumentation
and different spatial resolution. One can think
of $\overline{|B_z|}$ as the average signals in a calibrated
magnetogram (even though in some cases the actual measurements
involve sophisticated method of diagnostics). All these
measurements are based on Zeeman induced polarization signals.
The mean vertical field $\overline{|B_z|}$ is a {\em biased}
estimate of $\langle B\rangle$ since
\begin{equation}
\overline{|B_z|}\longrightarrow \beta~\langle B\rangle,
\end{equation}
in noiseless observations with $\infty$ spatial resolution,
i.e., in  observations free form the biases described
in \S~\ref{tangling}. The factor $\beta$ depends on the distribution
of magnetic field inclinations but it is of order
one in the extreme cases of vertical fields ($\beta=1$)
and isotropic distribution ($\beta=0.5$).
Note the clear trend for $\overline{|B_z|}$ to increase
with increasing angular resolution (i.e., with decreasing
size of the resolution element $L$). The solid line in
Fig.~\ref{unsignedflux} corresponds to a fit
$\overline{|B_z|}\propto L^{-1}$,
which is the behavior expected in the case of
polarization signals produced by the random association
of equal independent structures with size $l$ smaller than $L$
\citep{san09}.
\begin{figure}[!t]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=0.7]{sanchez_gonzalez_f3.ps}
\caption{
Mean magnetograph signal (unsigned flux density) observed in
quiet Sun regions as function of the spatial resolution
of the observation. Each symbol corresponds to a different
measurement identified with the appropriate reference in the inset.
The solid line represents a straight line
of slope  minus one fitted to the data. It
predicts a flux of 36\,G and 181\,G for resolutions of 100~km and
20 km, respectively.
Note the large scatter at the highest spatial resolutions.
This plot is an undated version of Fig.~1 in \citet{san09}.
}
\label{unsignedflux}
\end{figure}
In this oversimplified model
$\overline{|B_z|}\simeq \langle B\rangle$ when
the structures are resolved (i.e., when $L\simeq l$),
so the linear extrapolation predicts a flux of 36\,G or 181\,G depending
on whether the intrinsic size $l$ is 100\,km or 20\,km, respectively.
This extrapolation is not free from ambiguity, though.
In addition to the validity of the extrapolation,
the  main problem has to do with the large scatter of
among the $\overline{|B_z|}$ obtained with the best
present observations (they are labeled as Hinode
in Fig.~\ref{unsignedflux}, plus the point by
\citeauthor{mar10b}~\citeyear{mar10b}
 corresponding
to the magnetograph IMaX on-board the balloon SUNRISE; see
\citeauthor{mar10}~\citeyear{mar10}).
They span the range between 10\,G and 35\,G. Moreover,
the measurements of lowest unsigned
flux density hint at a saturation at some 10\,G which,
if real,  would make the above extrapolation meaningless.
Our guess is that the apparent inconsistencies
are mostly set by the unaccounted biases of the
different diagnostic techniques (as discussed
in \S~\ref{tangling}), therefore, they will be eventually
cured once those biases become properly understood.
However, this remains to be demonstrated, and
fixing out such inconsistencies is one of the major
goals of the quiet Sun physics today.
All these uncertainties notwithstanding, we think
that the present observations favor a quiet Sun mean
field $\langle B\rangle$ between 1 and 2\,hG.
As explained above, this high unsigned flux
is compatible with the observed Zeeman signals if,
as expected, we do not resolve the quiet Sun magnetic
structures yet (\S~\ref{tangling}).
Moreover, Hanle depolarization
signals provide an independent estimate of
$\langle B\rangle$ (at least of the contribution
to the mean magnetic field by $B$ less than a few hundred
G; see, \S~\ref{tangling}). In order to explain the observations
of  Sr\,{\sc i}\,$\lambda$4607, a mean magnetic field
in excess of 1\,hG seems to be required
\citep{san03,tru04,bom05}. Again, this estimate is not free
from ambiguity since it heavily relies on modeling
\citep[c.f.,][]{fau93,tru04}, and on the assumption of the
shape of $P(B)$ \citep{tru04,san05}. However, both
Zeeman and Hanle signals seems to agree in the high
$\langle B\rangle$ value.
Note that the unsigned flux density we advocate
is one order of magnitude
larger than the unsigned flux density in the form of
active regions, even during the  maximum of the
solar cycle \cite[][]{har93,san02b,san09}.

Another aspect of considerable importance, and bitter debate in the
literature, is the distribution of magnetic field strengths,
i.e., the shape of $P(B)$.  Assume the mean field to be known.
Is it representative of the most probable field in the
quiet Sun (the peak of the PDF) or, rather, is it much larger
and provided by the tail of kG fields? Even though most
of the quiet Sun has  $B < 1$\,hG (see Fig.~\ref{magpdfs}),
the kG fields may supersede the contribution of the
dG since their relative importance scale as
$\sim 10^4\cdot P(1\,{\rm kG})/P(1\,{\rm dG})$
(see Eq. [\ref{flux_energy_eq}] with $dB\sim B$).
Whether or not the kG significantly contribute
to the quiet Sun magnetic flux budget depends on the unknown
details of $P(B)$. The debate is
illustrated by two of the PDFs shown in Fig.~\ref{magpdfs}.
The mean field of the dotted and the dashed lines
is the same ($\simeq 2$\,hG), but in one case half of
it is provided by the kGs (the dashed line) whereas
kGs contribute with only 0.5\% in the second case
(the dotted line). As discused in \S~\ref{tangling}, all
the individual measurements of the field strength are strongly
biased, therefore, one would need to piece together several
 Hanle and Zeeman measurements with complementary biases
to infer the full PDF shape. However, this exercise
has not been properly done yet.
(\citeauthor{dom06}~\citeyear{dom06}  indicate the pathway.)
The discussions and conclusions found in the literature
rely on single measurements. Most of these
measurements favor little contribution of the kG fields
with respect to the hG fields
\citep[][]{kel94,lin95,kho02,lop06,lop07,oro07,ase07,mar08b,ase09,ish09,bec09}.
However, there is a minority of works where the presence
of kG fields in the quiet Sun stands out
\citep[][]{san00,soc02,san03c,dom06b,vit10a}.
One may say that the observations disfavor the
relevance of kG fields. However, from our point of view,
the debate has not been settled yet. First, the information
on the magnetic field strength is coded in the shape
of the line polarization and, thus, it is extracted
by carefully reproducing those shapes by inversion
\citep[e.g.,][]{sku87,rui92,san97b}.
It turns out that, so far,
the only works reproducing the observed strongly asymmetric line
shapes reveal kG fields.
Second, the high angular resolution images of the quiet Sun
show the ubiquitous presence of bright
points (BPs) in the intergranular lanes
\citep[][see Fig.~\ref{bpqs}]{san04a,dew05,dew08,bov08,san08,san10},
which are thought to trace kG magnetic concentrations
\citep[][]{spr76,car04,kel04}.
\begin{figure}[!t]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=0.25]{sanchez_gonzalez_f4.ps}
\caption{
G-band image of the quiet Sun at the disk center
with the observed Bright Points (BPs) enhanced.
BPs are thought to trace kG magnetic concentrations,
and they are found throughout,
with a number density equivalent  to 1.2~ BPs~per~granule.
The scale at the bottom left corner
corresponds to 5~Mm.
Adapted from \citet[][Fig.~1]{san10}.
}
\label{bpqs}
\end{figure}
The most recent counting indicates that at least 1\%
of the quiet Sun solar surface is covered by these BPs
(i.e., by kG fields). Such large fraction  of kG is consistent
with the filling factors of the kG-heavy PDFs \citep[][]{vit10a},
but it is far in excess of the most common works.
In any case, much work on the shape of $P(B)$ remains to
be done.

\section{Distribution of Magnetic Field Inclinations}\label{inclinations}

The numerical models predict a magnetic field with all inclinations
from 0\deg\ to 180\deg\ (\S~\ref{origins}). The presence
of a wide range of inclinations is also clear
from and observational point of view.
\citet{mar88} finds the longitudinal component of internetwork (IN)
magnetic fields to be present everywhere in the solar disk,
arguing the need for all inclinations to be present.
Similar arguments have been put forward more recently by others
\citep[e.g.,][]{meu98,lit02,har07}.
In particular,
the work of \citet{mar08} presents observations of the 1.56 $\mu$m
spectral lines at different positions on the disk, from the center to
an heliocentric angle of 63\deg.\
At their spatial resolution (0\farcs 8), both circular and linear polarization
are
present in at least 95\% of the field of view in all maps.
There is no trend in the observed ratio
circular-to-linear polarization signals from the disk center to the limb.
This means that the magnetic field at the quietest areas of the Sun must
not have a preferred direction or, in other
words, the distribution of magnetic fields
should be quasi-isotropic.
After these results, many recent works based on the
spectro-polarimetric data from Hinode have given a
different view of the quiet Sun magnetic fields.
\citet{lit08} and \citet{jin09} have shown that the transverse
component of the magnetic field is some five times more important
than the vertical one.
This is an observational fact that,
to our opinion, has been misunderstood, leading people to affirm that magnetic
fields
in the quiet Sun are mostly horizontal \citep[e.g.,][]{oro07,ish09}.
The excitement produced by these often-called
{\em transient horizontal fields} has lead to many papers only
dedicated to the detailed analysis of the magnetic fields inclined around 90\deg
,
forgetting that the whole picture of the quiet Sun magnetism must come
with the entire vector magnetic field distribution. We think that
these new results can be reconciled with the quiet Sun
magnetic fields to be (quasi-)isotropically distributed.
An isotropic magnetic field has a PDF of inclinations given by
\begin {equation}
P(\theta)={{\sin\theta}\over 2},
\end{equation}
being $0\le \theta \le 180$\deg\ the inclination with respect to any
reference direction.
From this equation we see that the probability is maximum at
$\theta=90\deg$, hence for transverse fields choosing
as reference the LOS direction.
At first, the fact that most magnetic fields are transverse to the
LOS in an isotropic distribution is counterintuitive.
However, it arises from the fact that for the magnetic field
to be LOS aligned it has to point in a specific direction, however,
for the field to be transverse many different directions are possible.
Figure~\ref{iso_inc} shows the histograms of magnetic field inclinations
derived by \citet{oro07,ish09} and \citet{bom09}.
\begin{figure}
\includegraphics[scale=0.6]{sanchez_gonzalez_f5.ps}
\caption{
Distributions of quiet Sun magnetic field inclinations
as derived by various groups (see the inset).
They are roughly consistent with an isotropic
distribution
(the solid line). The deviations at 0\deg, 90\deg, and 180\deg
are discussed in the main text.
}
\label{iso_inc}
\end{figure}
Except for the dip at 90\deg\ and the peaks at 0 and 180\deg,
the distribution is consistent with an isotropic distribution
with some scatter
(shown as the solid line in Fig.~\ref{iso_inc}).
The deviation at 0 and 180\deg\ can be easily explained as
a real effect associated with the kG fields, that tend to be
vertical \citep[e.g.][]{sch86,mar08},
whereas the dip at 90\deg\
may be an observational bias due to the presence of unresolved
structure.
Recently, the Bayesian approach of
\citet{ase09} has shown that, using the same data and modeling
as \citet{oro07}, the observations obtained with Hinode
are compatible with a quasi-isotropic distribution of magnetic
fields.

As we mentioned above, the measurements by \citet{lit08}
and \citet{jin09} lead to an apparent
transverse field five times larger than the
longitudinal magnetic field. Is this observational
result also consistent with an isotropic distribution of magnetic
fields? The answer is yes. The inference of these large mean
transverse magnetic  fields is based on assuming the
magnetic field structure to be spatially resolved at Hinode spatial
resolution (0\farcs 32). However, there is no clear reason why this
should be a good assumption (see \S~\ref{tangling}). If it is relaxed then
the apparent transverse magnetic field  $B_{\rm app}^T$ and the apparent
longitudinal magnetic field $B_{\rm app}^L$
scale differently with the fraction of resolution
element filled by magnetic structures $\alpha$, i.e.,
\begin{eqnarray}
B_{\rm app}^L=& \alpha\, B\cos\theta,\cr
B_{\rm app}^T=& \sqrt{\alpha}\,B\sin\theta.
\end{eqnarray}
(See, e.g., \citeauthor{lan04}~\citeyear{lan04}.)
Therefore, if $\alpha\not= 1$, then the apparent transverse magnetic field
is artificially inflated with respect to the longitudinal component by a
factor $1/\sqrt{\alpha}$, which can be very large for small values of the
filling factor. For example, an isotropic distribution
has $\langle|\cos\theta|\rangle=1/2$ and $\langle|\sin\theta|\rangle=\pi/4$,
therefore, if $\alpha\simeq 0.1$, then
\begin{equation}
{{\langle |B_{\rm app}^T|\rangle}\over
{\langle |B_{app}^L|\rangle}}={{\pi}\over{2\sqrt{\alpha}}}\simeq 5,
\end{equation}
in agreement with the observed ratio.

The complex quiet Sun magnetic fields may be viewed as a collection
of loops connecting the solar interior and the outer atmosphere
(see \S~\ref{time_loop}). The observed PDF of inclination sets
constraints on the properties of those loops as illustrated by
the following naive example. Assume the quiet Sun to be made out
of semi-circular loops fully contained in the photosphere.
The distribution of inclinations along each loop is uniform
(i.e., all inclinations are equally probable), therefore,
a collection of such loops would also have a uniform distribution.
A uniform distribution is inconsistent with the observed
quasi-isotropic distribution and, therefore,
the quiet Sun is not a collection of semi-circular loops.
Obviously this is just an academic example, but it
illustrates the prospects for the magnetic field inclination
PDF to constrain the loop properties, a diagnostic
potential that will have to be developed and eventually
exploited.

\section{Time Evolution on Short and Long Time-Scales}\label{time_evol}
\subsection{Variations on Short Time-Scales: Loop Emergence}\label{time_loop}

The quiet Sun magnetograms evolve on a time-scale as
short as that of the granulation
\citep[say, 10 min and shorter; see, e.g.,][]{lin99,har07,cen07,ish09}.
The quiet Sun fields are dragged along by horizontal plasma motions
\citep[e.g.,][]{zha98,dom03b} and, therefore, they tend to accumulate
where these motions are smallest. As a result of this
transport, all spatial scales of organized
photospheric motions appear in the quiet Sun magnetograms including
granulation and mesogranulation \citep[][]{dom03b,dom03c}.
The corresponding time-scales are also
observed: the mesogranular pattern lasts at least half an hour
\citep{dom03b}, whereas the lifetimes of the large IN patches
is of the order of a few hours \citep{zha98}.
It is  evident that the time-scales for the variation of
the quiet Sun fields are much shorter than those characterizing the
evolution of active regions \citep[several days; see, e.g.,][]{har93}.

At the shortest time-scales, the magnetic fields
emerge as small looplike structures
preferentially
in the center of the granules
\citep[][]{mar07,cen07,mar09}. Loops are to be expected as the result of
the uplift of subsurface magnetic structures transported by
convective motions \citep[e.g.,][]{cat99a,yel09}. The emergence rate of such
small-scale loops is 0.2 loops per hour and arcsec$^{2}$, which brings
1.1$\times$10$^{11}$ Mx s$^{-1}$ arcsec$^{-2}$ of new flux to the solar surface.
Initially, the loops are observed as small patches of linear polarization above
a granular cell. Shortly afterward, two footpoints of opposite polarity become
visible in circular polarization within or at the edges of the granule and start
moving toward the adjacent intergranular space. Interestingly, 23\% of the loops
that emerge in the photosphere reach the chromosphere
\citep[][]{mar09}.
The reconstructed time evolution of such an emergent loop event is plotted in
Fig.~\ref{loop1}. When the magnetic field emerges into the quiet surface the
loop presents a flattened, staple-like geometry and it maintains this geometry
across the photosphere. The loop in Fig.~\ref{loop1} has a mean magnetic
field strength of $B\sim 200 $~G occupying $30$\% of the
resolution element. Beyond the photosphere the loop develops an arch-like
geometry and its top rises at \hbox{$\sim 12$\,km\,s$^{-1}$}, close to the sound
speed in the chromosphere. The dynamics of the emergence
process can more complicated. Figure~\ref{loop2} shows the 3D topology of the
magnetic field associated with one of these events,
where the flux emerges in a preexisting granule as a structure showing
a simple bipolar loop with a clear preferred azimuth before developing a full
three-dimensional structure and dynamics. A conservative estimate of the
magnetic energy injection is $2.2\times 10^7$\,erg\,cm$^{-2}$\,s$^{-1}$, which is
of the same order of the estimated radiative losses for the chromosphere.
\citep[][]{mar10d}
\begin{figure}[!t]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=7cm,bb= 90 376 530 696]{sanchez_gonzalez_f6.ps}
\caption{Ascent of a small magnetic loop through the quiet solar atmosphere.
Since the azimuth always lies along the line connecting the footpoints of the
loop, the structure is collapsed to a plane. For each
time the reconstructed loop is represented with different colors, from blue to
orange as time increases. The gray area labeled $Ph$ represents the photosphere.
The gray line labeled $T_m$ represents the mean height for the temperature
minimum region.
The apex of the loop rises with a velocity of $\sim 3$\,km\,s$^{-1}$ in the photosphere.
Beyond the temperature minimum, the apex of the loop ascends  at
$\sim 12$\,km\,s$^{-1}$, close to the sound speed in the
chromosphere.}
\label{loop1}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[!t]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=7cm,bb= 109 395 455 769]{sanchez_gonzalez_f7.ps}
\caption{Three-dimensional topology of the magnetic field over a granule.
The continuum image at the bottom shows granular (bright) and intergranular (dark)
regions. Short lines indicate magnetic field orientation (blue for the footpoint
with positive, emergent polarity; red for the negative footpoint),
derived from inversion of the lines Fe~{\sc i}~$\lambda$6301 \& 6302
at the points with high enough polarization.
Representative field lines (tangent to these director vectors) are
calculated starting at the height of formation of the Fe~{\sc i} lines at one
footpoint and followed until they reach the same height at the other end.
Both footpoints happen to be connected.
The projection of field lines on the solar surface appear as colored lines
on the bottom plane, showing azimuth spreading over nearly 90$^\circ$.
From low-lying bluish lines to high-lying ones the magnetic field
fills most of the volume from the photosphere to the low-chromosphere. The
colors of field lines have been used for the ease of eye.
Adapted from \citet{mar10d}
}
\label{loop2}
\end{figure}

\subsection{Variations With the 11-year Cycle}\label{solar_cycle}
Little is known about this central issue. If, as discussed
in \S~\ref{origins}, the quiet Sun magnetic fields are not generated
by the global solar dynamo, then one expects no variation
of the quiet Sun magnetic fields with the solar cycle.
On the contrary, if they were observed to vary, it would show
the existence of a physical connection between quiet
Sun and active regions.
\citet{fau01} find a factor 2 variation of the mean
field derived from Hanle signals.
\citet{san03d} claims no variation within a 40~\% error bar.
\citet{shc03} also find no variation. The data of the
first four years of operation of the SOLIS magnetogram
\citep[][]{kel03} show no obvious sign of variation \citep[][]{har10}.
The Hanle scattering polarization signals of $C_2$ do not
vary with the cycle (Stenflo et al. 2010, these proceedings).
Based on this limited
information, we can conjecture that the quiet Sun magnetic flux does not seem
to suffer large variations along the cycle. If it does, the variations are
far smaller than those observed in active regions, whose total flux varies by
more
than one order of magnitude
\citep[e.g.,][Chapter 12, Fig. 4]{har93

\section{Why is the Quiet Sun Magnetism Important?}\label{importance}

	The quiet Sun is the component of the solar surface magnetism
that seems to carry most of the magnetic flux and magnetic energy
(\S~\ref{strength}). This fact makes it potentially important
to understand the global magnetic properties of the Sun
(solar dynamo, coronal heating, origin of the solar wind, and so on).
The potentials are starting to be acknowledged but the true
relevance is hard to foresee. The section mentions some
of the exploratory works analyzing the impact of the traditionally
neglected quiet Sun magnetic fields.

\citet{sch03b} study the influence of the
quiet Sun magnetic fields on the extrapolation of the
photospheric field to the corona. They conclude that
an important modification of the network
field lines is induced by the presence of the quiet Sun fields,
implying that
a significant part of these disorganized photospheric
fields do indeed reach the quiet corona. Similar conclusions
have been independently inferred by others
\citep[e.g.,][]{goo04,jen06}.
Inspired by these works, there has been inconclusive attempts
to find footpoints of transition region loops
in the interior of supergranulation cells \citep[][]{san07,jud08}.
However, the connection between the
photosphere and the outer atmosphere has been clearly established
by the newly discovered granule-size loops that are
continuously popping from the solar interior
(see \S~\ref{time_loop}). Theirs signatures
are clearly seeing in chromospheric lines after abandoning
the photosphere, and there is no reason to believe that
the ascension will stop there \citep[][]{mar09}.
Moreover, the amount of magnetic energy transported
by these rising loops is enough to balance the radiative
losses of the chromosphere (\S~\ref{time_loop}).
The problem arises as to how this energy is transformed into heat.
Recent magneto-hydrodynamic (MHD) simulations suggest that the small loops
reach
chromospheric heights and get reconnected with the local magnetic
fields, heating the plasma and generating MHD waves that propagate into the
corona \citep{iso08}. Another source of heating could be the Joule
dissipation of
magnetic energy involved in the reconnection, in the
spirit of the classical Parker's microflaring activity \citep{par94}.
As we mention in \S~\ref{strength}, a part of the quiet Sun
fields are in the form of vertical kG magnetic concentrations.
Those fields can provide a mechanical connection between the
photosphere and the upper atmosphere, e.g.,
as waveguides for the propagation of MHD waves
excited by photospheric motions
\citep[e.g.,][]{bal98,nis03,vit06,bon08}.
Actually,  magneto-acoustic oscillations that can
propagate upward have been
recently detected \citep{mar10c}. They do not
seem to be a characteristic mode of oscillations of the
magnetic structures but due to the forcing by
granular motions. Interestingly, the same magneto-acoustic oscillations have
been found upper in the photosphere, suggesting that there is indeed
propagation of some power to higher layers.

The physical processes that accelerate the solar wind
remain unknown. The wind is present on the Sun al all
times, even during solar minimum, therefore,
the role of quiet Sun fields on
its production cannot be discarded.
This problem has been recently addressed by \citet{cra10}.
They study the impact of the reconnection of closed loops
driven by photospheric motions that try to be realistic.
It was found unlikely that
either the slow or fast solar wind are driven by such reconnection,
but further work is required.

The solar metallicity is used as reference in astrophysics so,
if it is revised, then the metal content of the universe is
automatically revised, with the subsequent implications
on diverse areas spanning from stellar evolution to cosmology.
It turns out that the solar
metallicity has been modified by a factor $1/2$
two during the last decade
\citep[][and references therein]{asp05b,asp09}.
This major change has been mostly driven by the use
of realistic 3D numerical models of the solar
photosphere  to synthesize spectral lines \citep{stei98}.
These numerical models do not include the
quiet Sun magnetic fields,  which is a good approximation
from the traditional standpoint where the quiet Sun was non-magnetic.
However, if a mean field of 1-2\,hG pervades the quiet Sun
(\S~\ref{strength}), it should modify the convective transport
in the photospheric layers, and so the temperature stratification
that determines the line formation and the abundance.
In exploratory works, \citet[][]{bor08} and
\citet[][]{fab10} have considered the influence of the quiet Sun
fields on the solar metallicity estimates, founding it to be important.
The presence of quiet Sun magnetic fields forces us to reduce the inferred
metallicity by an additional 10\% \citep{fab10}.

\acknowledgements
The manuscript resulted from merging
the contributions that the two authors presented
separately during the SPW6 meeting. We thank the editor
of the proceedings, J. Kuhn, for allowing
this joint contribution.
Thanks are due to B.~Viticchi\'e for providing Fig.~\ref{asymmetries}.
The work has partly been funded by the Spanish Ministry
for education and science projects
AYA2007-66502, AYA2007-63881 and ESP2006-13030-C06-04.
Financial support by the European Commission through the SOLAIRE
Network (MTRN-CT-2006-035484) is also gratefully acknowledged.

Solar and Stellar Astrophysics (astro-ph.SR)

The Magnetic Fields of the Quiet Sun