Neutron Stars: Formed, Spun and Kicked

Abstract: One of the primary goals when studying stellar systems with neutron stars has been to reveal the physical properties of progenitors and understand how neutron star spins and birth kicks are determined. Over the years a consensus understanding had been developed, but recently some of the basic elements of this understanding are being challenged by current observations of some binary systems and their theoretical interpretation. In what follows we review such recent developments and highlight how they are interconnected; we particularly emphasize some of the assumptions and caveats of theoretical interpretations and examine their validity (e.g., in connection to the unknown radial velocities of pulsars or the nuances of multi-dimensional statistical analysis). The emerging picture does not erase our earlier understanding; instead it broadens it as it reveals additional pathways for neutron star formation and evolution: neutron stars probably form at the end of both core collapse of Fe cores of massive stars and electron-capture supernovae of ONeMg cores of lower-mass stars; birth kicks are required to be high (well in excess of 100 km/s) for some neutron stars and low (< 100 km/s) for others depending on the formation process; and spin up may occur not just through Roche-lobe overflow but also through wind accretion or phases of hypercritical accretion during common envelope evolution.

\section{Neutron Star Formation}

\subsection{Elements of a ``Standard Picture''}

Forty years after the discovery of pulsars it is fair to say that an immense amount of progress has been made in the quest to understand how neutron stars (NS) form and evolve in different stellar systems. Our understanding of these processes has benefited most importantly by the study of binary pulsars or X-ray binaries harboring NS with either stellar or degenerate companions (white dwarfs or other NS). Progress has been made both by studying specific observed systems as well as whole populations in the Galactic field or in globular clusters.These analyses and results have always coupled strongly to efforts in the areas of core-collapse and supernova (SN) explosions of massive stars, thermonuclear explosions of accreting white dwarfs, and nuclear evolution of massive stars.

Through this diverse body of work (for which it is impossible to include here all important references, but relevant overviews may be found in \citep{2006csxs.book..623T, 1991PhR...203....1B}) a generally accepted understanding seemed to have emerged anchored on the following crucial elements most relevant to the discussion presented in this paper: (i) NS form at the end of stellar nuclear evolution as remnants of SN explosions of massive stars of $\sim 10$\,M$_\odot$ up to $\sim 20-40$\,M$_\odot$; (ii) NS in close binaries typically have helium-rich progenitors at the time of core collapse; these progenitors are the helium-rich cores (typically more massive than 2\,M$_\odot$) of original massive binary companions which have lost their hydrogen-rich envelopes through binary interactions involving (stable or unstable) mass transfer between binary components and/or mass loss from the binary\footnote{In binaries with low-mass companions NS may also form through the accretion-induced collapse of white dwarfs, but here we focus on massive binaries.}; (iii) at the time of their formation NS acquire recoil kicks due to asymmetries that develop during the core-collapse process; typical kick magnitudes inferred from studies of pulsar population kinematics and the formation of binaries with NS are in the range of 100--300\,km\,s$^{-1}$; (iv) NS are born with birth spin periods of $\sim10$\,ms and spin down over a time span of $\sim 10$\,Myr; if in binaries they can spin up and reach spin periods of 10\,ms or shorter later in their life through accretion of material from their companion and accompanied reduction in magnetic-field strength.

\subsection{Recent Developments and Challenges}

In recent years a growing number of NS studies have challenged different aspects of the ``standard picture'' as described above. Although each one of these in isolation may not have been powerful enough to cause a paradigm shift, the current set of inter-linked arguments presented in the literature in the past $\sim 5$ years has certainly attracted attention and  has opened the door to potential changes in our current understanding of how NS form. In fact, as we will discuss in what follows, these recent developments do not actually erase or substitute our earlier understanding; instead they bring forward new possibilities that had not received much attention or had not even been raised previously.

With a broad-brush look, two main physical processes lie at the core of a lot of the issues raised in connection to NS formation and evolution: (i) {\em electron-capture supernovae} (ECS), and (ii) {\em hypercritical accretion onto NS} in common envelope phases (dynamically unstable mass transfer leading to common-envelope formation and ejection through NS inspiral towards the core of a massive companion).

The possibility of ECS was originally put forward as a potential channel for NS formation that does not involve the ``usual'' collapse of the iron core of a massive star at the end of nuclear evolution \citep{1980PASJ...32..303M,1984ApJ...277..791N,1987ApJ...322..206N}. Instead massive ONeMg white dwarfs can reach high enough densities for electrons to capture onto $^{24}$Mg and $^{20}$Ne (before Ne ignition can occur (see \citep{1980PASJ...32..303M, 1998ApJ...493L.101W, 2003ApJ...593..968W}),  causing the white dwarf to lose support against gravity; ultimately this process is expected to lead to core collapse, a SN, and a NS remnant. Such a collapse could occur right at the progenitor mass boundary between the formation of massive, ONeMg white dwarfs and the collapse of iron cores into NS: hydrogen-rich, original progenitors of $\sim 8-10$\,M$_\odot$. This mass range is, however, highly uncertain.

More recently Podsiadlowski et al.\ \citep{2004ApJ...612.1044P} proposed that ECS events are relevant for stars of initial mass in the range $8-11$\,M$_\odot$ in binary systems where they can avoid the second dredge-up phase on the asymptotic giant branch (AGB) (due to loss of the hydrogen-rich envelope) and form bigger helium cores; instead single stars of the same mass would form ONeMg white dwarfs. They also suggested that ECS are relatively fast explosions compared to delayed neutrino-driven explosions of iron cores and could naturally lead to natal kicks of low magnitudes. Kitaura et al.\ \citep{2006A&A...450..345K} modeled ECS explosions of a $\simeq$1.3\,M$_\odot$ ONeMg white dwarf (formed from a 2.2\,M$_\odot$ helium core, which in turn formed from an 8.8\,M$_\odot$ hydrogen-rich progenitor); they find that the explosions are rather faint (low $^{56}$Ni production), produce low-mass NS with baryonic mass of $1.36$\,M$_\odot$, and are not prompt but still delayed and powered by neutrino heating.  T.\ Janka during his talk at this conference \citep{J2008} presented more recent results and commented that the shock is not delayed long enough for kicks in excess of $\sim 100$\,km\,s$^{-1}$ to be produced. Last, Poelarends et al.\ \citep{2007arXiv0705.4643P} investigated the late evolution of solar-metallicity {\em single} stars on the AGB and concluded that stars in the mass range $9-9.25$\,M$_\odot$ could experience ECS, implying an ECS fraction of 4--20\% among all core-collapse SN, if one accounts for some of the model uncertainties (AGB stellar wind strengths and dredge-up efficiency, semi-convection, convective overshooting, rotational mixing; see \citep{2004MNRAS.353...87E, 2007A&A...476..893S}). In a similar study, Siess \citep{2007A&A...476..893S} concluded that the ECS mass range is indeed very narrow for single stars (<1--1.5\,M$_\odot$); at solar metallicity he finds a mass range of 9.5--10.5\,M$_\odot$ which is shifted downwards by 2\,M$_\odot$ if core overshooting is included and could also vanish altogether depending on the metallicity dependence of AGB winds.

In view of all this recent work, our current understanding of ECS in connection to NS progenitors and kicks can be summarized as follows: they can occur in nature and may contribute a small but non-negligible fraction of NS forming with natal kicks $\lesssim 100$\,km\,s$^{-1}$. Their progenitor mass range in single and binary stars is {\em highly uncertain}, but {\em may be as wide as} $7-12$\,M$_\odot$ \citep{2004ApJ...612.1044P, 2007arXiv0705.4643P, 2007A&A...476..893S}, and even reach down to 5\,M$_\odot$ for low-metallicity stars \citep{2007A&A...464..667G}, potentially including helium stars less massive than 2\,M$_\odot$ \citep{1980PASJ...32..303M, 1987ApJ...318..307M, 1993ApJ...414L.105H}.

A significant part of our understanding of how NS form and evolve comes from analyses of binary pulsars with two neutron stars (NS-NS).
In the ``standard'' NS-NS formation channel \citep{1991PhR...203....1B} the first-born NS experiences a common-envelope phase when its hydrogen-rich companion fills its Roche lobe. As a result the orbit shrinks to the small orbits observed, the helium-rich progenitor of the second NS is revealed, and the first NS has a chance of getting mildly recycled due to accretion in the common envelope and/or mass transfer from the helium star companion. Brown \citep{1995ApJ...440..270B} challenged the survival of the first NS through the common-envelope phase and argued that the NS will collapse instead into a black hole due to hyper-critical accretion (exceeding the photon Eddington limit by many orders of magnitude). He suggested an alternative formation scenario that envisions evolution through a double-common-envelope phase revealing two helium-rich NS progenitors  in a tight orbit, followed by two consequent SN explosions. This channel requires that the two hydrogen-rich massive progenitors have almost equal masses (within 4\%) and could also potentially explain the almost equal NS masses in NS-NS. We note however, that hydrodynamical studies of hypercritical accretion (e.g., \citep{1996ApJ...460..801F}) and population studies of NS-NS formation that have accounted for hypercritical accretion (e.g., \citep{2002ApJ...572..407B}) have concluded that if the maximum NS mass is $\simeq 2$\,M$_\odot$ or higher, then a significant fraction of NS can still survive the common-envelope phase and avoid collapse into a black hole.

\section{Progenitor Masses}

For almost two decades now, it has been widely accepted that there is a minimum mass a helium-rich star must have for the formation of an iron core and NS formation at core collapse. This minimum value is somewhat dependent on the detailed treatment of convection and late phases of nuclear burning in stellar models, but has been known to be in excess of 2\,M$_\odot$ (e.g., in the range 2.1--2.3\,M$_\odot$, see Habets \citep{1986A&A...167...61H}).

One pathway for helium stars to be less massive than the above limit at the time of core collapse is provided by mass transfer onto its binary companion, which however does not abort iron-core formation. Recently, several independent groups have analysed the late stages of evolution of NS-NS progenitors and all reached the same conclusion:  at least two of the known close NS-NS binaries (PSR J0737-3039 and PSR~B1534+12) were experiencing Roche-lobe overflow mass transfer from the helium-rich progenitor of the second NS onto the first NS at the time of the second SN explosion \citep{2004MNRAS.349..169D, 2004ApJ...603L.101W, 2004ApJ...616..414W, 2005ApJ...619.1036T, 2006MNRAS.373L..50S}.
Although the mass accretion onto the NS may be rather small (and yet still adequate for mild recycling), the mass of the helium star can be reduced significantly ($\simeq 0.5 - 1.5$\,M$_\odot$ from its original mass by the time of its core collapse \citep{2002MNRAS.331.1027D, 2003ApJ...592..475I, 2003MNRAS.344..629D}.

Alternatively (or even concurrently?) NS formed in ECS are also expected to originate from low-mass helium cores. This is primarily because of the connection to an ONeMg core that just barely exceeds the Chandrasekhar mass when electron capture and loss of support ensue. Although the ECS progenitor mass range is highly uncertain (see previous section), it tends to lie below 11--12\,M$_\odot$ and potentially includes helium-rich progenitors less massive than 2\,M$_\odot$ (see ECS discussion in \citep{2005astro.ph.11811B, 2007arXiv0706.4096I}. Such low-mass progenitors would also naturally produce low-mass NS with baryonic masses very close to the Chandrasekhar limit and gravitational masses of $\simeq 1.25$\,M$_\odot$ \citep{2006A&A...450..345K, 2007arXiv0706.4096I}.

The discovery of the double pulsar \citep{2003Natur.426..531B} and the mass measurement of pulsar B (the second-born NS) at 1.25\,M$_\odot$  led Podsiadlowski et al.\ \citep{2005MNRAS.361.1243P} to suggest an ECS origin. A number of independent groups analyzed the evolutionary history of this system, given the observed characteristics, and derived constraints on the immediate (right before the SN) progenitor of pulsar B. Piran \& Shaviv \citep{2005PhRvL..94e1102P} were the first to allow as part of the priors in the statistical analysis helium star progenitors less massive than 2\,M$_\odot$; they found that progenitor masses in the range 1.25--1.75\,M$_\odot$ were favored by their analysis at the 30\% confidence level, while masses up to 2\,M$_\odot$ could just be reached
at 97\% confidence level (see their Figure 2). Willems et al.\ \citep{2006PhRvD..74d3003W} presented a detailed analysis that explored the influence of all uncertainties associated with the systems (most notably its age and radial velocity with respect to the Sun); when allowing for low-mass progenitors they too concluded that the {most likely} helium star masses lie in the range 1.35--1.95\,M$_\odot$, while the 90\% confidence intervals extended up to 2.5\,M$_\odot$ (see their Figure 6 and Table IV). More recently, Stairs et al.\ \citep{2006MNRAS.373L..50S} addressed some of these questions using updated proper motion measurements, and they too concluded that the immediate progenitor of pulsar B was likely less massive than 2\,M$_\odot$ with most likely values at $\simeq 1.5$\,M$_\odot$ (see their Figure 1).
These conclusions are very different from those of a very similar analysis of the NS-NS system PSR~B1534+12 for which
Stairs et al.\ \citep{2006MNRAS.373L..50S} report a most likely value of 2.45\,M$_\odot$ and a 95\% confidence interval 1.6--3.9\,M$_\odot$.

Based on these results, it appears most probable that the immediate progenitor of pulsar B was less massive than 2\,M$_\odot$ (most likely $\simeq 1.5$\,M$_\odot$), even though this is clearly not universal among close NS-NS binaries. The next question becomes: {\em what does this low mass tell us about NS formation? } We would argue that the answer is still unclear. It is indeed very tempting to associate this mass with an ECS event and declare the case closed, and this could very well be the answer. However, we should not eliminate from our thinking that PSR~J0737-3039 has also been found by several independent studies to be in a phase of Roche-lobe  at the time of pulsar B formation. Consequently, we cannot exclude that the low progenitor mass is due to mass transfer (albeit with small accretion onto pulsar A) initiated before the SN explosion. {\em We conclude that both of these possibilities remain as potentially relevant to the double pulsar formation.}

At present no obvious secure observational test to distinguish between these two possibilities appears to exist. However we suggest that two different types of theoretical studies could shed some light and allow us to make further progress: {\em (i)} detailed mass transfer sequences that can explain not just the low progenitor mass but also the orbital characteristics right at the explosion time as well as the measured NS masses; {\em (ii)} population studies simulating evolution forward in time focusing on the question of the relative frequency of ECS vs. mass transfer effects depending on assumptions about the highly uncertain ECS progenitor mass range.

\section{Supernova Kick Magnitudes}

For over more than three decades now, estimates of kick velocity magnitudes imparted to NS at birth have been obtained through the analysis of the kinematics of single pulsar samples of varying sizes and reliability of proper motion measurements (starting with Gunn \& Ostriker \citep{1970ApJ...160..979G}).  Arzoumanian et al.\ \citep{2002ApJ...568..289A} analyzed a sample of 79 single pulsar proper motions and concluded that the NS kick magnitude distribution is best described by a two-component Maxwellian velocity distribution with characteristic velocities (three-dimensional velocity dispersions) of 90\,km\,s$^{-1}$ and 500\,km\,s$^{-1}$ with almost equal relative weight. More recently, Hobbs et al.\ \citep{2005MNRAS.360..974H} adopted an updated electron density model and used a sample of 73 proper motion measurements for
pulsars with short characteristic ages ($\lesssim 3$\,Myr); they concluded that the sample is best described by a single Maxwellian with a one-dimensional velocity dispersion of 265\,km\,s$^{-1}$, shifting the mean kick velocity to values $\simeq 400$\,km\,s$^{-1}$. Very similar results were also obtained by Zou et al.\ \citep{2005MNRAS.362.1189Z}. It is recognized that these results could be somewhat contaminated by pulsars originating from disrupted binaries and the contribution of orbital velocities, and by a potential bias against low velocities due to the associated small and hence not easily measurable proper motions. Nevertheless, it is clear that overall these analyses point to significant kick magnitudes of a few hundreds of km\,s$^{-1}$.

Additional constraints on NS kick magnitudes have been obtained by the analysis of the evolutionary history of specific binary systems with NS known in the Galaxy, most notably binary pulsars and X-ray binaries. Although the majority of such studies in the past reached conclusions in support of significant NS kicks, more recently a number of arguments and analyses point towards a need for at least some NS receiving low-magnitude kicks. In what follows we summarize such evidence and place it in the context of our developing current understanding.

{\bf Neutron Stars in Globular Clusters.} Perhaps one of the earliest arguments in favor of modest or negligible NS birth kicks has been anchored on the need for NS retention in globular clusters. The observed low-mass X-ray binaries (persistent and transient) and binary pulsars in Galactic globular clusters have led to estimates for the total number of NS currently present in clusters in the range $300-1,000$ \citep{2005ApJ...625..796H}, implying retention fractions of $1-10$\%. Given that current estimates of cluster escape velocities lie in the range $\simeq 20-50$\,km\,s$^{-1}$, it is evident that clusters could indeed pose a requirement for low kick magnitudes. Pfahl et al.\ \citep{2002ApJ...573..283P} concluded that retention fractions of 1--10\% can be achieved if kick magnitude distributions are Maxwellians with one-dimensional dispersions smaller than $\simeq 200$\,km\,s$^{-1}$. They also found that the vast majority of NS are retained in massive binaries in the clusters. However the increased characteristic kick magnitudes derived by Hobbs et al.\ \citep{2005MNRAS.360..974H} re-emphasized the issue of NS retention in clusters. Most recently, Ivanova et al.\ \citep{2007arXiv0706.4096I, 2006MNRAS.372.1043I} and Kuranov \& Postnov \citep{2006AstL...32..393K}
concluded that the required retention fractions can still be obtained, if a significant fraction of NS form through ECS events, and if these NS acquire either no kicks or kicks reduced by a factor of 10 relative to kicks imparted to NS formed through iron core collapse.

{\bf High Mass X-ray Binaries.} Pfahl et al.\ \citep{2002ApJ...574..364P} highlighted the existence of a  subclass of high-mass X-ray binaries characterized by relatively low orbital eccentricities ($<0.2$) and wide orbits (periods in excess of 30\,d). They argued that their formation appears highly unlikely, unless some NS acquire only small kicks of $\simeq20$\,km\,s$^{-1}$ (see their Figures 3 and 5). Subsequently Podsiadlowski et al.\ \citep{2004ApJ...612.1044P} associated these low kicks with NS formation in ECS events and accounted for the subclass of low-eccentricity, wide high-mass X-ray binaries assuming a rather wide ECS mass range of $8-14$\,M$_\odot$.

{\bf Double Neutron Stars.} The pattern of observed systems requiring both low and high NS kick magnitudes appears to be even more perplexed for the case of NS-NS binaries.
To our knowledge van den Heuvel \citep{2004ESASP.552..185V} was the first to point to NS-NS and argue in favor of low NS kicks based on the occurrence of small eccentricities ($<0.3$) for 5 of the 7 systems known in the Galactic field. Following Pfahl et al.\ \citep{2002ApJ...573..283P} and Podsiadlowski et al.\ \citep{2004ApJ...612.1044P}, he suggested that {\em some} second-born NS must have received very small kicks ($\simeq 20$\,km\,s$^{-1}$) because of ECS formation. On the other hand, Chaurasia \& Bailes \citep{2005ApJ...632.1054C} and Ihm et al.\ \citep{2006ApJ...652..540I} showed that orbital evolution through gravitational radiation alters the eccentricity distribution: many of the high-eccentricity systems are drained from the population because they evolve fast and either merge and/or shift to lower eccentricities through circularization.

McLaughlin et al.\ \citep{2005ASPC..328...43M} highlighted a correlation between the NS-NS eccentricities and the spin periods of the first-born NS in the systems, while Faulkner et al.\  \citep{2005ApJ...618L.119F} argued that such a correlation would naturally arise if all second-born NS were formed symmetrically and no kicks were imparted to them. Following this initial suggestion, Dewi et al.\ \citep{2005MNRAS.363L..71D} performed population studies adopting a simple spin-up model for the first-born NS and concluded that such a correlation appears only if {\em all} second-born NS acquire kicks from a Maxwellian with a velocity dispersion of $\lesssim 50$\,km\,s$^{-1}$. Willems et al.\ \cite{W2008} explored the potential role of polar kicks in forming this correlation and similarly conclude that low kicks for the second-born NS seem to be needed in order to explain this correlation.

Not surprisingly, the particular case of the {\em double pulsar} (PSR~J0737-3039) has attracted a lot of attention in this discussion of NS kick magnitudes. The binary pulsar has a low eccentricity (0.09) and a low second-born NS mass (1.25\,M$_\odot$), and most recently a low proper motion (10\,km\,s$^{-1}$) was reported \citep{2006Sci...314...97K}. Hence, it appears as the prime candidate for a system where the second-born NS was formed through an ECS event and acquired a small kick.
Willems et al.\ \citep{2004ApJ...616..414W} assumed the ``standard'' minimum progenitor mass of 2\,M$_\odot$ and adopted a flat prior distribution for the unknown radial velocity and found most probably kick magnitudes in the range 100--300\,km\,s$^{-1}$.
Podsiadlowski et al.\ \citep{2005MNRAS.361.1243P} used the low mass of pulsar B as the ``tell-tale sign'' for ECS and hence a small kick imparted to it, anticipating a small proper motion measurement. Piran \& Shaviv \citep{2005PhRvL..94e1102P}
used the measured orbital characteristics and an earlier estimate of the proper motion to derive a probability distribution for the birth kick to pulsar B. In their calculation they allowed for the possibility of very low-mass progenitors and also made a number of restrictive assumptions about the system's age and its Galactic motion (the latter allowed them to by-pass the question of the unknown radial velocity). They primarily highlighted their result derived at 30\% confidence level favoring kick magnitudes either $<30$\,km\,s$^{-1}$ or in the range $50-80$\,km\,s$^{-1}$. At a safer confidence level of 97\%, their results set an {\em upper limit of} 125\,km\,s$^{-1}$ (see their Figure 2C).

Following these studies, Willems et al.\ \citep{2006PhRvD..74d3003W} and Stairs et al.\ \citep{2006MNRAS.373L..50S} presented the two most comprehensive analyses of this system to date (the latter of the two using the most recent and reliable measurement from pulsar timing of the proper motion by Kramer et al.\ \citep{2006Sci...314...97K}). Both reached rather similar conclusions for the {\em most likely} kick magnitude imparted to pulsar B: 50--170\,km\,s$^{-1}$ (Willems et al. \citep{2006PhRvD..74d3003W}) and 40--80\,km\,s$^{-1}$ (Stairs et al. \citep{2006MNRAS.373L..50S}). As expected these magnitudes reach much higher values if wider confidence intervals are considered. Willems et al.\ \citep{2006PhRvD..74d3003W} found up to 300\,km\,s$^{-1}$ at 90\% confidence level, assuming a Gaussian distribution for the unknown radial velocity with dispersion of 130\,km\,s$^{-1}$ (motivated by population synthesis calculations). Stairs et al.\ \citep{2006MNRAS.373L..50S} found kicks in the range of 45--1000\,km\,s$^{-1}$ for the same radial velocity  assumptions, and of 20--140\,km\,s$^{-1}$, assuming velocity vectors are isotropically  distributed around the transverse velocity. The issue of the radial velocities has been identified by these two studies in particular as quite important for the best possible determination of the kick magnitude. To avoid a long digression we discuss this issue in more detail in the Appendix where we show the simple assumption of isotropicity for the system velocity to not be justified.

It is interesting to compare the Willems et al.\ \citep{2006PhRvD..74d3003W} and Stairs et al.\ \citep{2006MNRAS.373L..50S} results to those obtained by Piran \& Shaviv \citep{2005PhRvL..94e1102P}. Although each study has used somewhat different observational constraints as they became available, one can say that at zeroth order all three studies agree that, once immediate progenitor masses lower than 2\,M$_\odot$ are allowed as part of the priors in the statistical analysis (motivated by ECS events or collapse of rather small iron cores), then kick magnitudes in the range $10-100$\,km\,s$^{-1}$ are clearly favored at low confidence intervals ($\simeq 30$\%). For these magnitudes, Willems et al.\ \citep{2004ApJ...616..414W} and Stairs et al. \citep{2006MNRAS.373L..50S} predicted a spin misalignment angle for pulsar A smaller than 20$^{\rm o}$ in very good agreement with the upper limit of 10--15$^{\rm o}$ at similar confidence intervals just recently reported by Ferdman et al.\ \citep{F2008}.

Some subtleties however do arise at a more detailed level of examination. Although these do not alter the basic conclusions in any way, it is somewhat important to briefly identify some of them, to avoid propagation to misunderstandings or misconceptions. For example: (i) a NS progenitor of mass lower than 2\,M$_\odot$ does not necessarily imply that kicks must also be very small ($\simeq 20$\,km\,s$^{-1}$); (ii) the current position of the system close to the Galactic plane does not necessarily imply that the system and kick velocity must be small (see the point made by Figure 9b in \citep{2006PhRvD..74d3003W}); (iii) the derived probability distributions are inherently multi-dimensional (5-D: progenitor mass, orbital separation, kick magnitude, and two kick direction angles) and statements about preferred kick magnitudes are {\em quite sensitive} to projection effects in different dimensions because of the complex structure of the multi-dimensional surface (as shown in Table III in \citep{2006PhRvD..74d3003W}, the statement of ``{\em most likely}'' kick can vary by a factor of $\sim 7$ from 10 to 75\,km\,s$^{-1}$ depending on the projection dimensionality); (iv) the system age is one of the poorest constrained priors in the determination of the probability distributions (as seen from Table III in Willems et al. \citep{2006PhRvD..74d3003W}, the ``{\em most likely}'' kick can vary by a factor of $\sim 30$ from 5 to 170\,km\,s$^{-1}$ depending on the assumed system age); (v) the most likely birth location of the system can be several kpc away from its current position (see Figure 8 in \citep{2006PhRvD..74d3003W}), so that following the three dimensional motion of the binary is important for the dynamics.

The results obtained for the {\em other NS-NS binaries} are particularly interesting in comparison to the case of the double pulsar. Just like with the second-born NS progenitor masses, PSR~B1534+12 paints a rather different picture for NS kicks. Independent studies \citep{2004ApJ...616..414W, 2005ApJ...619.1036T} have concluded that a minimum kick of $\simeq200$\,km\,s$^{-1}$ is needed to explain its properties along with its significant spin-orbit misalignment. It is further interesting to point out that this system has a rather small eccentricity (<0.3) {\em and} exhibits rather well the correlation between pulsar spin period and orbital eccentricity. Both of these attributes have been associated  with second-born NS getting no or minimal ($\simeq 20$\,km\,s$^{-1}$) kicks \citep{2004ESASP.552..185V, 2005MNRAS.363L..71D, W2008}. PSR~1534+12 therefore clearly presents a contradictory example. PSR~B1913+16 also clearly requires a significant kick magnitude of at least 260\,km\,s$^{-1}$ \citep[][and references therein]{2004ApJ...616..414W, S2008}.

\section{Spin Up Opportunities for Double Neutron Stars}

It has been long recognized that first-born NS in NS-NS must have been spun-up (recycled) at some stage prior to the second NS formation event. However, the measured spin periods are all rather long in the range 10--100\,ms, in excess of the ``classical'' millisecond pulsars, and these NS are thought to be only {\em mildly} recycled. Nevertheless, even mild recycling {\em requires} some level of accretion onto the NS at some stage between the two SN events. This requirement is sometimes ignored in discussions of NS-NS formation, but can provide us with some insights and constraints.

In the ``standard'' NS-NS formation channel, the first-born NS has in principle two opportunities for recycling: either during the common-envelope inspiral involving the hydrogen-rich progenitor of the second NS or during a mass-transfer phase driven by Roche-lobe overflow from the helium core exposed after the common-envelope phase. As mentioned already, the progenitors of at least two of the known NS-NS binaries were indeed in such a mass transfer phase from the helium-rich companion to the first-born NS at the time of the second SN explosion. Therefore the need for NS spin-up during the common envelope is alleviated for these systems.

It is also interesting that all explanations of the correlation between spin period and eccentricity rely on a (linear) scaling between the accretion amount responsible for the spin-up and the mass of the second-born NS progenitor right before the explosion. Such a scaling arises naturally if spin-up happens during a phase of Roche-lobe overflow mass transfer from a helium-rich companion and is supported by mass-transfer calculations of NS helium-star binaries \citep{2002MNRAS.331.1027D, 2003ApJ...592..475I, 2003MNRAS.344..629D} (see also Fig. 2 in \citep{W2008}). Willems et al. \citep{W2008} furthermore noted that the presence of high-eccentricity systems on the spin period-eccentricity relation could support the existence of a similar scaling for NS accretion during common envelope phases.

Last, it is important to realize that in the case of the double common-envelope channel put forward by Brown \citep{1995ApJ...440..270B}, the opportunities for NS spin-up are limited and potentially negligible. Given how similar the masses of the two progenitors are, the time between the two SN explosions is very short ($<1,000$\,yr) and it is difficult to imagine that in this short time both the orbital and stellar characteristics would happen to be appropriate for establishing Roche-lobe overflow and spinning up the first-born NS. In their population simulations Belczynski et al.\ \citep{2002ApJ...572..407B} did indeed identify this NS-NS formation channel, but, for a maximum NS mass of 3\,M$_\odot$, it only contributed 8\% of the total NS-NS population. Most importantly though Belczynski et al. did not find any opportunity for NS recycling. They also considered a model with a maximum NS mass of 1.5\,M$_\odot$ (model D2) and naturally found a significant contribution to NS-NS formation from the double common-envelope channel, but the issue of recycling remained. More recently Dewi et al.\ \citep{2006MNRAS.368.1742D} modeled NS-NS formation through this channel and obtained rates very similar to those by Belczynski et al.\ \citep{2002ApJ...572..407B}, but did not comment on the difficulty with recycling the first-born NS in the systems.

At present we would say that the question of when and under what circumstances first-born NS in NS-NS binaries get recycled is rather unclear. If the double common-envelope channel is shown to be dominant in some way, then spin-up during mass transfer from the helium-rich companion would be necessary. It is possible that accretion during common envelope inspiral or wind accretion alone without Roche-lobe overflow would be sufficient to recycle the first born NS, although so far neither of these have been examined quantitatively. Also, if the correlation between spin period and orbital eccentricity persists, the amount of mass accreted by the NS must scale with the donor mass regardless of the mode of mass transfer.

\section{Current Conclusions: One Size Does Not Fit All}

The picture of NS formation from 10 years ago has clearly changed and paradigms have shifted - NS formation now appears more diverse than we thought both in terms of progenitor masses and birth kicks, and thus also in terms of core-collapse physics, asymmetry developments, and maybe even kick mechanisms.

In the last 3 years, the number of papers favoring small or even zero NS kicks has mushroomed. A lot of this recent work is driven by the increasing observational information regarding binary pulsars as well as new detections. We summarize the current picture as follows:
\noindent
(1) NS form from the iron core collapse of  helium-rich
progenitors with masses above $\simeq 2\,M_\odot$, though lower masses may be possible if significant mass loss through Roche lobe overflow occurs shortly before NS formation. Alternatively, NS form from lower-mass helium stars through ECS of massive ONeMg cores. The ECS progenitor mass range is currently highly uncertain, but the channel may be particularly accessible for NS formation in binaries where the NS progenitors lose their hydrogen-rich envelope before the second dredge-up on the AGB.
\noindent
(2) Typical NS kicks of 200-300\,km\,s$^{-1}$ are still favored by analyses of pulsar kinematics and are required for many of the known binary NS systems. However sub-populations of or some specific NS binaries clearly favor smaller kick magnitudes (lower than $\sim 100$\,km\,s$^{-1}$, although probably not as low as $\sim 10$\,km\,s$^{-1}$ (T.\ Janka 2007, private communication); these may be naturally provided during ECS events because of the short duration of the explosion limiting the development of asymmetries and build-up of larger kicks.
\noindent
(3) NS recycling back to $\sim$\,ms spin periods occurs through long-term, steady accretion through Roche-lobe overflow. For some of the known double NS systems such mass transfer from the helium-rich progenitor of the second NS is actually required; however, depending on the dominant formation channel(s), mild recycling to $\sim10$\,ms may be possible (or even required) during the common envelope phase or through wind accretion from the helium-rich NS companion.
\noindent
The diversity is apparent and it is providing us with new clues for the formation and origin of NS (see also \citep{S2008} for a related discussion).

In the near future we look forward to more analyses that can hopefully constrain some of the current uncertainties: what is the progenitor mass range for NS formation through both iron-core collapse and ECS, especially in binaries over a range of metallicities? Is there a minimum and/or maximum NS kick associated with ECS events? Do NS survive hypercritical accretion in common envelopes? Which progenitor properties determine the birth NS masses?

\begin{figure}
  \includegraphics[height=.29\textheight]{angleVelLosSUN50AllCut0Cut1.pdf}
  \includegraphics[height=.285\textheight]{angleVelLosSUN260AllCut0Cut1.pdf}
  \caption{Present-day distributions of the direction angle $\theta$ between NS-NS systemic velocities and our line-of-sight, for population synthesis models adopting Maxwellian kick velocity distributions with dispersions of 50\,km\,s$^{-1}$ (left) and 260\,km\,s$^{-1}$ (right). Solid lines represent the full population of NS-NS binaries, dashed lines the sub-population of systems within 50\,pc from the Galactic plane (Cut0), and dot-dashed lines the sub-population of systems within 50\,pc from the Galactic plane with a proper motion of less than 10\,km\,s$^{-1}$ (Cut1). For comparison, the isotropic $\theta$-distribution $f(\theta) = (\sin \theta)/2$ is also shown (dotted line). All PDFs are constructed using the NS-NS populations synthesized by Willems et al. (2006).}
  \label{f1}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}
  \includegraphics[height=.29\textheight]{angleVelLosSUN50AllCut2.pdf}
  \includegraphics[height=.29\textheight]{angleVelLosSUN260AllCut2.pdf}
  \caption{As Figure~\ref{f1}, but with different constraints imposed on the population. Solid lines represent the full population of NS-NS binaries (as in Figure ~\ref{f1}), and dashed lines the sub-population of systems located within $\pm 20^\circ$ from PSR J0737-3039's position in Galactic longitude and latitude ($l=245.2^\circ$, $b=-4.5^\circ$; Cut3). The dotted line represents the isotropic $\theta$-distribution $f(\theta) = (\sin \theta)/2$. }
  \label{f2}
\end{figure}

\begin{theacknowledgments}
We are grateful to Ingrid Stairs for useful discussions and comments on this manuscript, and to Jeff Kaplan and Chris Belczynski for allowing us use of their codes from their earlier work in collaboration with VK and BW. This work is partially supported by a Packard Foundation Fellowship in Science and Engineering and a NSF CAREER grant (AST-0449558) to VK.
\end{theacknowledgments}

\section{Appendix}

All of the analyses of evolutionary histories and kinematics of pulsar systems suffer from the lack of any constraints on their radial velocities \citep{ 2004ApJ...616..414W, 2005ApJ...619.1036T, 2000ApJ...528..401W,2006PhRvD..74d3003W, 2006MNRAS.373L..50S}. In the case of PSR~J0737-3039, probably the most exhaustively studied binary pulsar, the question of the appropriate radial velocity distribution that should be adopted is one of the most important remaining uncertainties in the models (along with the age). Piran \& Shaviv \citep{2005PhRvL..94e1102P, 2005astro.ph.10584P} did not assume anything, but therefore had to restrict the Galactic motion to one dimension; Willems et al. \citep{2004ApJ...616..414W} assumed a broad flat radial velocity distribution; Willems et al. \citep{2006PhRvD..74d3003W} used population synthesis for the formation and motion of NS-NS binaries to derive theoretical radial velocity distributions filling in the void left by the lack of empirical constraints; Stairs et al. \citep{2006MNRAS.373L..50S} also adopted the latter in combination with updated proper motion constraints, but at the same time argued in favor of a radial velocity distribution obtained by assuming an isotropic distribution for the angle $\theta$ between the full 3-D space velocity and our line-of-sight. The choice between these two priors alters their most likely kick velocity at 95\% confidence level from 45--1005\,km\,s$^{-1}$ to 20--140\,km\,s$^{-1}$. Given this level of influence on results, we examine this question in more detail in what follows.

The isotropic assumption appears reasonable in the absence of other constraints and most importantly appears intuitive. Quantitatively, it leads to a much narrower radial velocity PDF than the one obtained from population synthesis models (see Figure~1 in \citep{2006MNRAS.373L..50S}	). However, it is possible that the motion of the NS-NS population introduces velocity anisotropicities, especially when proper motion and location constraints are incorporated. In particular, if the motion is dominated by Galactic rotation, as it is for the progenitors of NS-NS, the systemic velocity distribution will be strongly anisotropic and depend on the direction of the line-of-sight. Specifically let us consider the following {\em thought experiment}: if only small kicks are imparted to the second-born NS at birth, an observer located at the Galactic center will see a $\theta$-distribution that is {\em strongly peaked} near angles of $90^\circ$. It is hard to envision that such a distribution would appear isotropic when the observer's viewpoint is shifted from the Galactic center to the position of the Sun.

To illustrate this further, we use the theoretical NS-NS populations synthesized by Willems et al. \citep{2006PhRvD..74d3003W} in the case of isotropic SN kick velocities with magnitudes drawn from Maxwellian distributions with dispersions of 50\,km\,s$^{-1}$ (as an example of pre-dominantly low kicks) and 260\,km\,s$^{-1}$ (as inferred by Hobbs et al.\ \citep{2005MNRAS.360..974H}).   We follow the formation and motion of these systems in the Galaxy and use the results to derive present-day radial and transverse velocities of NS-NS binaries as well as PDFs for the angle $\theta$ between the 3-D space velocities and the line-of-sight. We note that with this definition for $\theta$ the radial velocity $V_r$ is related to the transverse velocity $V_t$ as $V_r = V_t/\tan \theta$, so $\theta=0$ points away from us and $\theta=\pi$ towards us. Stairs et al. \citep{2006MNRAS.373L..50S} used this relation to derive an empirical radial velocity distribution for PSR J0737-3039 using $V_t = 10\,{\rm km\,s^{-1}}$ \citep{2006Sci...314...97K} and assuming an isotropic distribution for $\theta$.

In Figure~\ref{f1}, we show the resulting present--day PDFs of the angle $\theta$ for the entire NS-NS population in the two kick velocity models, for the sub-population of systems within 50\,pc from the Galactic plane, and for the sub-population of systems within 50\,pc from the Galactic plane with a proper motion of less than10\,km\,s$^{-1}$. The distributions are {\em clearly anisotropic} for both kick velocity models, with a strong preference for directions along the line-of-sight (towards or away from us) emerging when the population of NS-NS systems is restricted to binaries within 50\,pc from the Galactic plane {\em and} a small proper motion of less than 10\,km\,s$^{-1}$, characteristic of PSR J0737-3039. In Figure~\ref{f2}, we show the $\theta$-PDFs for the sub-population of NS-NS binaries located within $\pm 20^\circ$ from PSR J0737-3039's position in Galactic longitude and latitude. Here too, the distribution of $\theta$-angles is clearly anisotropic, with velocity vectors pointing primarily towards us. The anisotropy persists if the sample population is restricted to systems within 1\,kpc from the Sun (the current upper limit on the distance from the Sun to PSR J0737-3039 \citep{2006Sci...314...97K}). The same holds true when combining the constraints on the vertical distance to the Galactic plane, the proper motion, and the position in terms of Galactic coordinates, though the statistics of the simulated samples become considerably poorer.

We conclude that, although it appears intuitive that the direction of the space velocity of the double pulsar is distributed isotropically around the line-of-sight, the system's motion due to Galactic rotation and the post-SN peculiar velocity combined with the non-central position of observers on Earth induce significant anisotropies in the  double pulsar's most likely space velocity. Such anisotropies are implicitly taken into account in the theoretical radial velocity distributions derived and used by Willems et al. \citep{2006PhRvD..74d3003W} to constrain the formation of the second-born pulsar in PSR J0737-3039; therefore the resulting broader distributions of radial velocities are physically motivated and self-consistent compared to the narrower distribution obtained with the ad hoc assumption of isotropic velocities with respect to our line-of-sight.

\bibliographystyle{aipproc}

Neutron Stars: Formed, Spun and Kicked


Black Box QGP

Abstract: According to extensive ab initio calculations of lattice QCD, the very large energy density available in heavy-ion collisions at SPS and now at RHIC must be sufficient to generate quark-gluon plasma (QGP), a new state of matter in the form of plasma of free quarks and gluons. The new state of matter discovered at RHIC seems to be perfect fluid rather than free plasma. Its shear viscosity is assumed to be almost zero. In this work, I first considered the theoretical and phenomenological consequences of this discovery and finally asked questions about the nature of phase transition and properties of matter. It is important to answer these questions, otherwise QGP will remain a kind of black box; one sends a signal via new experiments or simulations or models and gets another one from it. I will show that some promising ideas have already been suggested a long time ago. I will also suggest a new phase diagram with separated deconfinement and freeze-out boundaries and a mixed state of thermal quark matter and bubbles of hadron gas.

\section{\label{sec:intr}Introduction}

Theory that describes the dynamics of phase transition to quark-gluon
plasma (QGP) and back to hadronic matter is still failed.
In high-energy experiments, we can only measure produced particles in
the final state, i.e., after chemical and thermal freeze-outs. Consequently,
occurrence of equilibration processes while energy density decreases can
not be confirmed experimentally. Same statement is valid for degrees
of freedom during hadronization processes. It is known that thermal
models work well in the final state. They presume a charge-conserved
hadronic phase and have no access to phase transition. In other words, the
phenomenology of QGP and particularly the dynamics of phase transition
seems to represent a kind of black box.
This might explain why we used to assume that the deconfinement
temperature $T_c$ at small chemical potential is coincident with the  chemical
freeze-out temperature $T_{fo}$~\cite{TawPT1}. What are the consequences
of this assumption? For example, what type of strongly interacting
matter we have in mind
that undergoes a phase transition back to confined hadrons, very
much rapidly expands and finally freezes out through chemical processes
without any change in its temperature? Is it possible to describe it
by QCD? Or should we assume that the chemical freeze-out does not exist?

Although the energy density available in heavy-ion collisions at
CERN-SPS~\cite{spsE} and now at BNL-RHIC~\cite{rhicE} exceeds the
critical value calculated in lattice QCD
($\epsilon_c\approx0.7\;$GeV$/$fm$^{-3}$), many physicists still debate
on QGP signatures under these
laboratory conditions. If \hbox{$T_c=T_{fo}$} should hold at small chemical
potentials, phenomenological signals that characterize phase
transition should remain measurable in the final state.
At least QGP signatures that are not sensitive to a medium, such as
color screening or $J/\Psi$ dissociation into two leptons have to
survive at \hbox{$T_c=T_{fo}$}. On the basis of current experimental and theoretical
progress, we can think of other solutions, like
$T_c>>T_{fo}$. If $T_c>>T_{fo}$, then QGP
signatures are very much
contaminated (in-medium-modified) so that the final state does not
reflect QGP production.  Furthermore, we can assume that the
production of QGP requires much higher temperature than the currently
available temperature at RHIC~\cite{rhicT}.

QCD predicts that matter under extreme conditions is simple but
it does not say anything about matter being ideally formed. For
temperatures larger than $\Lambda_{QCD}$, the matter is in a
deconfined phase. Only a good understanding of the dynamics of phase transition
will help us to characterize QGP.

\section{\label{sec:nphs}Transition to new phase(s)}

The end of the hadron era was predicted fifty five years
ago~\cite{pomeronchuk51}. No doubt that hadrons will go into a new state
of
matter at sufficiently high temperatures and densities~\cite{Hag65}. The
wide acceptable
framework to study the
phase transition of strongly interacting matter is given by QCD. QCD
predicts that the hot hadronic matter becomes simple. This is not
necessarily weakly interacting.
QCD has been studied on a lattice for the past thirty
years; QCD Lagrangian has to be
discretized and everything has to be put on a finite a space-time
lattice. It has been shown that a change in the phase of matter undoubtedly
exists at sufficiently high energy densities. The degree of freedom
markedly increases in a relative narrow region of temperatures. For a
purely gluonic
system, for which the equation of state can be computed without
approximations, there is a deconfinement phase transition. It is of the
first order
and the critical temperature is $T_c\sim270\;$MeV~\cite{GlunTherm81}.

The difficulties in lattice calculations start when
the fermion sector is switched on. Nevertheless, it has also been observed
that the chiral symmetry is restored at the same critical temperature
$T_c\approx 154-174\;$MeV (depending of quark flavors) as that of
deconfinement transition. The restoration of chiral symmetry
means that the effective mass of quarks forming the
hadron states becomes zero. Another important consequence of chiral
symmetry breaking  restoration is the disappearance of the mass degeneracy of
hadronic states with the same spin but different parity quantum numbers. Dynamical quarks can only be included in lattice QCD in
certain approximations. The order of phase transition in full QCD is
not yet completely known. We merely see a rapid change in bulk
thermodynamic quantities. Consequently, the transition is known as
cross-over. The behavior of QCD phase transition at a finite
chemical potential is not yet known from first principle of QCD.
Nevertheless, if we look at the lattice results at a zero chemical
potential, Fig.~\ref{Fig:1}, we find that the
system at temperatures of $4-5T_c$ remains below the Boltzmann
limit~\cite{Peikert00}; $\epsilon_{SB}\approx g \pi^2 T^4/30$. It seems
that $\epsilon/T^4$ will remain constant at higher temperatures. This
means that the deconfined system is still strongly correlated. This is
also valid at finite chemical potentials.

Apart from the known properties of lattice calculations, like heavy
quark masses and finite lattice size and spacing, we have from this
figure evidence that hadrons undergo a transition to a strongly
correlated phase. Another important finding is the nature of phase
transition. It is not a real phase transition but a rapid change in the
degree of freedom.  Characterizing the nature of matter above $T_c$ is
essential for particle physics. It is important in order to understand
the development of the universe in early stages.

\begin{figure}[thb]
\centerline{\includegraphics[width=8.cm]{energy_nf_all_heavy.eps}}
\caption{ Energy density in lattice QCD calculated for different
 quark flavors. It is clear that the energy density at the temperature
 $1.2T_c<T>4T_c$ is smaller than the energy density in the
 Stefan-Boltzmann limit.} \label{Fig:1}
\end{figure}

\section{\label{sec:rhic}RHIC results and lattice response}

Using elliptic flow, it was possible to conclude that
RHIC has produced thermalized matter at a very high energy
density~\footnote[1]{The official press release had the title: ''RHIC
scientists serve up perfect liquid''. This mainly has been based on a
comparison with hydrodynamics. Because in the hydrodynamic codes, one
has to introduce
''many'' inputs, e.g., initial conditions, equation of state, phase
transition, chemical freeze-out and thermal local
equilibration in order to solve the equations of motion
numerically and describe the hydrodynamical evolution,
one has to be very careful with this kind of comparison.}. For
the first time, hydrodynamics with a zero viscosity can
describe heavy-ion reactions. In relativistic hydrodynamics, under
the assumption of local thermalization, the number density, current and
energy-momentum tensors are
\begin{eqnarray}
\delta_{\mu} n_i^{\mu} &=& 0, \hspace*{1cm} \delta_{\mu} J^{\mu}  = 0,
 \hspace*{1cm} \delta_{\mu} T^{\mu\nu} = 0 \nonumber \\
J_i^{\mu} &=& n_i u^{\mu} \nonumber \\
T^{\mu\nu} &=& (\epsilon+P) u^{\mu} u^{\nu} - P g^{\mu\nu} - \eta
 (\delta^{\mu}u^{\nu} + \delta^{\nu} u^{\mu} + \hbox{Tr}) - {\cal
 O}(\zeta) \label{EqHydr1}
\end{eqnarray}
where $\eta$ and $\zeta$ are the shear and bulk viscosities,
respectively. The number density and entropy density are conserved.
In strongly interacting quantum fields, the ratio of shear viscosity to
entropy density is as~\cite{Visc1}
\begin{eqnarray}
\frac{\eta}{s} &\approx& \frac{1}{4 \pi}
\end{eqnarray}
As mentioned above, it was possible to describe RHIC results by
hydrodynamics, even if the last two terms in Eq.~\ref{EqHydr1} are
entirely removed. This means that matter above $T_c$ should also have a zero
viscosity. It is a fluid rather than a free plasma; the
correlations do not completely vanish.

The pioneering quenched lattice calculations performed by Atsushi~Nakamura of
Hiroshima University for the transport coefficients of
gluonic plasma~\cite{Nakam1} seem to confirm the above results. The lattice
calculations are performed in the framework of the linear response model.
\begin{eqnarray}
\eta
= - \int d^{3}x' \int_{-\infty}^{t} dt_{1} e^{\epsilon(t_{1}-t)}
     \int_{-\infty}^{t_{1}}
     dt'<T_{12}(\vec{x},t)T_{12}(\vec{x'},t')>_{ret}
\label{off-diagonal}
\end{eqnarray}
$<T_{12}(\vec{x},t)T_{12}(\vec{x'},t')>_{ret}$ is related to Green's
function of the energy-momentum tensor.
Fig.~\ref{Fig:Nakam} depicts the results for temperatures up to
$30T_c$. Shear viscosity in the perturbation theory is as~\cite{Arnold}
\begin{eqnarray}
 \eta = \frac{\eta_1 \cdot T^{3}}{g^{4}(\ln(\mu^{*}/g T)},
 \label{Pert}
\end{eqnarray}
where $\eta_1=27.126$, $\mu^*/T=2.765$, $\mu=T_c/\Lambda_{QCD}$ and $g$
is the running coupling constant.

\begin{figure}[thb]
\centerline{\includegraphics[width=10.0cm]{ETAVSS.eps}} \vspace*{-1.2cm}

\centerline{\includegraphics[width=9.cm]{eta2.eps}}\vspace*{-.8cm}

\caption{
Top: $\eta/s$ obtained by quenched lattice simulations (symbols)
 compared with perturbative results (lines). Bottom: shear viscosity
 in GeV$^3$ units. $\mu$ is a parameter given in Eq.~\ref{Pert}. }
 \label{Fig:Nakam}
\end{figure}

As mentioned above, only the gluonic sector has been taken into account
in these lattice calculations. The fermionic part entirely vanishes. In this
case, the bulk viscosity is almost zero. It is clear that lattice
calculations agree with the perturbation theory at high
temperatures. However, for $T\leq3T_c$, we find that the lattice results
lie below the perturbative lines.

It is needed to include quarks. By doing this, we can
describe the transport properties of matter above $T_c$ and make a
better comparison with phenomenological results. Also, we need to
improve the inputs for hydrodynamical codes.\\

\begin{figure}[thb]
\centerline{\includegraphics[width=8.cm]{fig2.eps}}
\caption{ $J/\Psi$ bound state has been found to survive at almost
 twofold $T_c$. Curves cited from~\cite{JPsi}. } \label{Fig:2}
\end{figure}

The collision energy is sufficiently high to catapult
hadrons into a new phase. Thus, we now have the situation that the
properties of recently
discovered new state of matter has to be confirmed
by three independent methods: analytical, numerical and
experimental.

QCD-like models and/or effective models can be used in the analytical
method. To the author's knowledge, the only analytical method applied
so far -- apart from limitations -- is in~\cite{Visc1}.

The most powerful numerical method is lattice QCD with dynamical quarks,
which still uses nonphysically heavy or almost vanishing quark masses
and faces a serious challenge when the chemical potential becomes
finite. As mentioned above, the properties of new state of matter are
studied in lattice QCD in
quenched approximation~\cite{Nakam1}. The lattice results have to be
interpreted with respect to all these approximations. For example, the
critical energy density and temperature at the physical quark masses are
larger than those given above, namely, $T_c\simeq 200\;$MeV,
$\epsilon_c\simeq2\;$GeV$/$fm$^{-3}$. This has the consequence that
$T_c\neq T_{fo}$. The deconfinement point
is not the same as that of chemical freeze-out~\cite{TawPT1}.

The experimental method is the ultimate goal. The proof that a
new phase of matter is produced -- beyond any doubt -- has to be
adduced experimentally. Experimentalists have maintained this
position since more than two decades. Particle theorists used to tell
them that hadrons for  $T>T_c$  will go into an ''ideal''
deconfined phase and into free  plasma.

Plasma is a phase of matter in which charges are screened due to the existence
of other mobile charges. This will modify Coulomb's Law. Recent lattice
results on spectral functions show that the $J/\Psi$ bound state can
survive even at $\sim2T_c$, (Fig.~\ref{Fig:2}). In these quenched
lattice calculations, $T_c\simeq270\;$MeV. As mentioned above, RHIC
results imply that the new state of matter is a fluid rather than
a free gas.

On the other hand, when we think about the situation that,
in heavy-ion experiments, one starts and ends up with hadrons, we
realize that the experimental proof is non trivial. Hadrons will be
accelerated, collide against each other and freeze out to
produce new ''hadrons''. The latter will be counted by
detectors. This should illustrate the importance of making precise
theoretical predictions. Nevertheless, I think that experimental
physics is now studied using powerful tools.\\

\section{\label{sec:csrn}Gluon condensates and correlations}

 \begin{figure}[thb]
\begin{center}
      \epsfig{file=quarglucond.ps,height=70mm,
       bbllx=85,bblly=240,bburx=484,bbury=611}
\caption{ Gluon condensate of $SU(3)$ (solid line) and an ideal
  gluon gas (broken line) compared with the cases where light (heavy)
  dynamical quarks are included, denoted by open (full) symbols,
  respectively. Curves cited from~\cite{David00} } \label{Fig:3}
\end{center}
\end{figure}

Many ideas about the complex structure of phase transition have
been suggested. For instance, the soft modes of confined hadrons can
survive the restoration of chiral symmetry breaking~\cite{Hatsuda1} and
that hadron plasma can be formed instead of QGP~\cite{hp}.
Also there are many lines of evidence that deconfined matter don not
behave like free gas. For example, gluon condensates~\cite{shlee1,David00}
remain finite above $T_c$. Gluon condensates have been calculated at a
finite temperature and in the presence of massive
quarks~\cite{David00}. It has been assumed that such quarks due to
strong interactions will modify the thermal properties of gluon
condensates. Therefore gluon condensates remain almost unchanged with
the half of their value in the confined phase~\cite{shlee1}. This means
that matter seems to be sticky~\cite{Brwn2}.
\begin{equation}
\langle G^2 \rangle_T ~=~ \langle G^2 \rangle_0
~+~m_q\langle\bar{\psi}_q{\psi}_q \rangle_0~
~-~m_q\langle\bar{\psi}_q{\psi}_q\rangle_T~
~-~\langle \Theta^{\mu}_{\mu}\rangle_T.
\label{eq:fullcond}
\end{equation}
Fig.~\ref{Fig:3} depicts this quantity. At $T>T_c$, the condensates at a
zero chemical potential seem to
be $T-$independent.

Thus, we have concluded that hadronic matter is expected to undergo phase
transition to a new state of matter at high temperatures. The new state
of matter is strongly correlated due to the non vanishing gluon
condensates and the existence of finite hadronic modes.

\section{\label{sec:npd}Phase space and QCD phase diagram}

Phase transition at a very large chemical potential is most
likely of the first order; at $T_c$, only one phase can
exist. This first-order line is expected to end up with a critical end
point of the second order. Its location was the subject of different lattice
simulations. To date, there has been no final result. In dynamical QCD with
$2+1$ flavors of staggered quarks of physical masses~\cite{Fodor04}, the
endpoint has been localized at $T=162\pm2\;$MeV and
$\mu_b=360\pm40\;$MeV. According to the same reference the critical
temperature at $\mu_b=0$ is $164\pm2\;$MeV. From recent lattice
simulations~\cite{Katz1} and comparisons with the resonance gas
model~\cite{TawRGM}, we assume that $T_c(\mu_b=0)$ should be $\sim
200\;$MeV. The temperature of the chemical freeze-out at a zero chemical
potential is \hbox{$\sim174\;$MeV}.
Another determination of the endpoint has been reported
in~\cite{Shinji1}; $\mu_b\approx420\;$MeV. The corresponding temperature
has not been  estimated.

We can summarize that the
endpoint is at approximately $\mu_b\approx400\;$MeV or
$\mu_b/T_c\approx2$. This value corresponds to collision energy
$\sqrt{s_{NN}}\approx 9\;$GeV. The lead beam at $40\;$AGeV (SPS) can be used
to scan this region. Note that, at this energy, we have
fully unexplained peaks in the ratios of strangeness to
non-strangeness particle yields~\cite{TawRt}. That the ratios of
strangeness hyperons to non-strangeness hadrons (pions) all have
a maximum value at the same energy is an indication
of strangeness asymmetry. This can only be achieved in the plasma
phase~\cite{Reflsk}. i.e., it assumes that the
interacting system at this energy should undergo phase transition to
QGP. The phase transition is likely of the first order.

On the other hand, we do not observe such a peak at higher energies. It is an
open question, why QGP-signatures e.g., color screening and strangeness
asymmetry are not seen, when colliding energy increases?  It is believed
that, at RHIC and SPS~\cite{Tawold} energies, we have produced the
highest thermalized system ever known. The reason might be the nature of
system produced and the dynamics controlling phase transition. In other
words, the new state of matter might not have the properties of QGP, for
which we have suggested phenomenological signatures. \\

One possibility to explain the difficulties with detecting phenomenological
signatures at low chemical potential is the
non-equilibrium quark occupancy of phase space, i.e., $\gamma_i\neq1$. At
finite temperature $T$, strangeness $\mu_S$ and iso-spin  $\mu_{I_3}$
and baryo-chemical potential $\mu_B$, the pressure of one
hadron is
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:lnz1}
p(T,\mu_B,\mu_S,\mu_{I_3}) &=& \frac{g}{2\pi^2}T \int_{0}^{\infty}
           k^2 dk  \ln\left[1 \pm\,
           \gamma\,
           \lambda_B \lambda_S \lambda_{I_3}
	   e^{\frac{-\varepsilon(k)}{T}}\right],
\end{eqnarray}
where $\varepsilon(k)=(k^2+m^2)^{1/2}$ is single-particle energy and $\pm$
stands for bosons and fermions, respectively. $g$ is spin-isospin
degeneracy factor. $\lambda=\exp(\mu/T)$ is fugacity parameters. $\mu$
is the chemical potential multiplied by corresponding change. The total
pressure is obtained by summation all hadron resonances.
$\gamma$ appears in front of Boltzmann exponential,
$\exp(-\varepsilon/T)$. It gives averaged occupancy of phase space relative to
equilibrium limit. Therefore, in equilibrium limit,
$\gamma=1$. Assuming time evolution of system, we can describe
$\gamma_i$ as ratio between the change in particle number before
and after chemical freeze-out, i.e. $\gamma_i =
n_i(t)/n_i(\infty)$. The chemical freeze-out is defined as time scale,
at which there is no longer particle production and the collisions
is entirely elastic. In case of phase transition, $\gamma_i$ is expected to
be larger than one, because of non-equilibrium processes, large degrees
of freedom and expanding
phase space.

\begin{figure}[htb]
\centerline{\includegraphics[width=10.cm]{EntropyPerParticle_1.eps}}
\caption{\label{Fig:5a}
Entropy per particle $s/n$ as function of $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$. Singularity
 is located at almost the same energy as the peaks of particle ratios of
 strangeness to non-strangeness~\cite{TawRt}.
}
\end{figure}

The dependence of single-particle entropy on collision energy is related
to averaged phase space density. In Boltzmann limit and for one
particle, we get that
\begin{eqnarray}
\frac{s}{n} &=& \frac{\varepsilon}{T} + 1 - \frac{\mu}{T}
 \label{sOvern}
\end{eqnarray}
where $\varepsilon$ is single-particle energy. In this expression, $s/n$
directly relates to $\varepsilon$. $s$ is the entropy density. $n$ is
the particle number density. Apparently, $s/n$ gets a maximum
value, when $\mu=\varepsilon$. Because of Boltzmann limit, the
maximum, in this classical system, is unity. Depending on
$\mu$, we can insert particles into phase space. Maximum occupation is
reached at $\mu=\varepsilon$. Beyond this limit, it is prohibited to
insert more particles. On the other hand, we can expect -- at least
theoretically -- that the occupation value is larger than one, if phase
space itself is changed. The latter situation is most likely provoked by phase
transition.

The connection between this theoretical discussion and particle ratios of
strangeness hyperons to non-strangeness is given by $\gamma_i$. As in
\cite{TawRt}, $s/n$ plays the same role as $\gamma_i$.

The results of $s/n$ vs. $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ are depicted in
Fig.~\ref{Fig:5a}. Full grand-canonical statistical set of the
thermodynamic parameters is used. In this case, the complete dependence
of $s/n$ on $T$ and $\mu$ and consequently on $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$, can
straightforwardly be obtained by deriving $s$ and $n$ from Eq.~\ref{eq:lnz1}.

For $\gamma_q=\gamma_s=1$, we find that $s/n$ increases as the energy
raises from AGS until low SPS energies ($\sqrt{s_{NN}}\leq9\;$GeV). For higher
energies, $s/n$ remains constant. This behavior might be an indication
to strong compensation of collision energy in this region. Although,
more energy is introduced to system, number of particles allowed to
occupy phase space remains constant. It is an indirect
signature that the phase space itself remains constant. \\

For varying $\gamma_q$ and $\gamma_s$, we find a singularity at
$\sqrt{s_{NN}}\approx7\;$GeV. Equivalently, phase space is maximum at this
energy. At higher energies, $s/n$  decreases. Although, energy increases
and consequently the produced particles, single-particle
entropy decreases. This means that phase space shrinks. At RHIC energies,
the shrinking becomes slower than at SPS. If this model
gives the correct description, we now might have for the first time a
theoretical explanation for dependence of phase space on energy. The
phase space at SPS energy is apparently larger than at RHIC. Same
behavior has been found experimentally~\cite{Gudima}. The consequences
are that QGP might be produced at SPS and detecting its signatures at
RHIC might be non trivial. \\

\begin{figure}[thb]
\centerline{      \epsfig{file=phaseBoundary.ps,height=70mm,
       bbllx=85,bblly=350,bburx=684,bbury=711}
}
\caption{ Phase diagram of QCD. The values of the chiral symmetry
 order parameter  $<\bar{\psi}\psi>$ are also given. We distinguish
 between the freeze-out and transition lines. At small chemical
 potentials, the hadrons most likely undergo a smooth transition to a
 thermal phase accommodating a hadron gas and  a fluid of quarks and
 gluons. At hight $T$, the mixed phase entirely disappears. Matter will
 then be formed in QGP. } \label{Fig:my}
\end{figure}

The situation is different at small chemical potentials. It is most
likely that the transition can not be characterized by a line. As shown
above, the transition in this region is a rapid cross-over. The critical
temperature is an average, (Fig.~\ref{Fig:1}). Therefore, we expect that the
transition is a kind of wide boundary. From Fig.~\ref{Fig:1}, we can
roughly estimate that the transition boundary has a width of at least $4T_c$.
At temperatures up to $4T_c$, the degrees of freedom in the new phase of
matter are $30\%$ smaller than that in the Stefan-Boltzmann limit,
(Fig.~\ref{Fig:1}).

There are indications that the hadronic bound states can survive
above $T_c$, (Fig.~\ref{Fig:2}). We have discussed the
hydrodynamical results at RHIC energies. From all these results, it
seems physically consistent to suggest that the new
phase of matter is a mixture of the surviving hadron gas and a
fluid of quarks and gluons~\cite{Gyul84}. The hadron gas might form bubbles
inside the quark fluid. This explains two important features, the
degrees of freedom and existing hadronic bound states above $T_c$. \\

Based on the above discussion, we suggest a ''new'' phase diagram in
Fig.~\ref{Fig:my}. We separate the line of equilibrium chemical freeze
out from that of phase transition. At a zero chemical potential,
phase transition takes place at $T\sim200\;$MeV~\cite{TawPT1,Katz1}. The
equilibrium chemical freeze-out takes place at
$T\simeq174\;$MeV~\cite{TawPT1}. The two lines slightly become shorten with
increasing chemical potential. Phase transition at chemical
potentials up to the value corresponding to the endpoint is no longer a
cross-over. Consequently, QGP is expected at much higher temperatures
than $T_c$. Between the hadron gas and the QGP there is a mixed phase, in
which the two degrees of freedom partly exist.
The properties of matter in the mixed phase are as follows.
\begin{itemize}
\item It is an ordinary ''nearly perfect'' fluid (it is not free gas or
plasma),
\item It has very small but finite viscosity (it is not a superfluid),
\item It has electric resistance (it is not a superconductor),
\item It is a strongly correlated matter, since hadronic bound
	   states can survive above $T_c$.
\item It is a sticky matter, since gluon condensates remain
	   finite above $T_c$.
\end{itemize}

In the light of these properties, we need to answer the following
questions:
\begin{itemize}
\item What is the order of phase transition at small chemical
      potentials (related to RHIC, LHC or early stage of universe)? What is the
      order of phase transition from the mixed phase to QGP at very
      high temperatures?
\item How can we confirm the transition at small chemical potentials
      phenomenologically?
\item What are the in-medium modifications of hadron properties at
      finite $T$ and $\mu_b$~\cite{Taw061}?
\item What are transport properties above $T_c$?
\end{itemize}
We have to answer all these questions before we face a much difficult
challenge with CERN-LHC and GSI-FAIR. We have to have clear theoretical
descriptions and non ambiguous phenomenological signatures describing
the QCD phase diagram. Non-perturbative QCD is a good candidate to
answer some of these questions. Phenomenological studies are also very
essential. \\ \\

\noindent
{\bf Acknowledgment} \\
This work has been supported by the Japanese Society for the Promotion of
Science. I would like to thank A.~Hosaka, A.~Nakamura and H.~Toki for
fruitful discussions.

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology (hep-ph)

Black Box QGP


Observation of Raman G-band splitting in top-doped few-layer graphene

Abstract: An experimental study of Raman scattering in N-layer graphene as a function of the top layer doping is reported. At high doping level, achieved by a CHF_3 plasma treatment, we observe a splitting of the $G$ band in the spectra of bilayer and 4-layer graphene (N even), whereas the splitting is not visible in case of monolayer and trilayer graphene (N odd). The different behaviors are related to distinct electron-phonon interactions, which are affected by symmetry breaking and Fermi level position in different ways in the various N-layer graphenes. In trilayer graphene, a weakening of the electron-phonon coupling as a function of the Fermi energy induces a hardening of all zone-center in-plane optical phonon modes, like in monolayer graphene. On the other hand, in 4-layer graphene two distinct trends are observed in the G band as a function of doping, suggesting the presence of two different groups of electron-phonon interactions, like in bilayer graphene.

\section{Introduction}
Since the demonstration of the isolation of a single atomic plane of
graphite (graphene) on a standard $SiO_{2} / Si$ substrate
~\cite{Novoselov2005}, it has suddenly become possible to
experimentally verify many theoretical predictions about the
peculiar physical behavior of graphene-based systems. Indeed, the
linear $E-k$ dispersion curves, and the consequent relativistic-like
behavior of charge carriers in monolayer graphene, have been broadly
confirmed by several experimental observations
~\cite{CastroNeto2009,Geim2007}. Interestingly, stacking a number
$N$ of graphene layers on top of each other can lead to new physical
systems exhibiting completely different properties. For instance,
some peculiar gate-tunable electronic and optical properties have
been recently reported in the bilayer case
~\cite{Zhang2009,Mak2009b,Kuzmenko2009,Tang2010}.

In fact, the interlayer coupling induces a gradual departure from
the electronic bands of monolayer graphene ~\cite{Koshino2009},
until the bulk limit (graphite) is reached for $N$ large enough.
Therefore, there is a range of $N$ where the physical properties of
graphene stacks are sensitive even to a variation $\Delta N=1$. For
instance, a qualitative difference between the transport properties
of bilayer and trilayer graphene was evidenced in recent experiments
~\cite{Craciun2009}. Moreover, the optical absorption spectra are
predicted to systematically vary with the layers number within the
effective mass approximation for $1\leq N\leq 6$~\cite{Koshino2009},
reflecting the gradual modification of the band structure. Here we
show that a clear splitting of the Raman $G$ band is observed for
$N=2$ and $N=4$, when the multilayer graphene symmetry is broken by
heavy doping of the top layer, whereas the splitting is not observed
for $N=1$ and $N=3$. The presence or absence of splitting highlights
different electron-phonon interactions, which are influenced by
doping and symmetry breaking in distinct ways in the various
$N$-layer graphenes. The reported results confirm two experimental
reports in literature about the $G$ band splitting in bilayer
graphene (obtained by gate field effect)~\cite{Malard2008,Yan2009},
adding new important information such as a systematic study of the
splitting as a function of the layers number and of the doping.

Raman spectroscopy is a very powerful tool for studying graphene,
yielding information on the electronic structure and on the
electron-phonon coupling (EPC) in the material ~\cite{Ferrari2007,
Malard2009}. In fact, this technique allows to clearly distinguish a
monolayer and a bilayer from a few-layer graphene, through the
analysis of the $2D$ band ~\cite{Ferrari2006}, and to estimate the
charge carrier density and type in monolayer graphene from the
spectral positions and relative intensities of the $G$ and $2D$
bands ~\cite{Das2008}. The $G$ band (at $\sim 1580$ cm$^{-1}$) is
due to a first-order Raman scattering process involving zone-center
in-plane  optical phonons. In stacked graphene layers, the
vibrations in different atomic planes can combine with each other in
various ways, depending on the number of layers and on the stacking
order. Moreover, the EPC is affected by the number and symmetry of
the stacked layers, so that the $G$ band may be used to study the
effects of symmetry breaking and doping on the electronic and
phononic properties of multilayer graphenes. The knowledge of these
effects is of fundamental importance for the development of
graphene-based field-effect electronic devices.

\section{Experimental}
Graphene layers studied in this work were deposited on a 285 nm
thick $SiO_{2}$ on $Si$ substrates, by adhesive tape exfoliation of
natural graphite. Then, the samples were analyzed by optical
microscopy, in order to estimate the number of graphene layers
composing the deposited thin flakes. It can be seen in Fig.~\ref{f1}
that the contrast (defined as $1-R_{G}/R_{S}$, where $R_{G}$ and
$R_{S}$ are the reflected light intensities from the $SiO_{2}/Si$
substrate with and without graphene, respectively) measured on many
semi-transparent flakes increases in a stepwise manner. The analysis
of the $2D$ Raman band confirmed that the lowest two steps
correspond to monolayer and bilayer graphenes, indicating that few
graphene layers can be counted by contrast analysis. Such a behavior
is related to the optical absorption of graphene, which was found to
be directly proportional to the number of layers for $N$ small
enough ~\cite{Nair2008}. Using appropriate filters in order to
select the wavelengths at which the contrast variation is high, we
were able to distinguish up to 6 layers. Moreover, the experimental
contrast values were checked by theoretical calculations within the
Fresnel coefficients approach~\cite{Bruna2009}.
\begin{figure}
  \includegraphics{fig1}%
  \caption{(color online). Optical microscope image of one of the flakes analyzed in this work
(top). The number of layers estimated by contrast analysis is
indicated. In the bottom graph, the discrete behavior of the
contrast as a function of the number of layers is shown.
Experimental data, obtained at $\lambda$=550nm, are compared to
theoretical values.}\label{f1}
\end{figure}
After a preliminary annealing in vacuum (1x10$^{-5}$ mbar for two
days) in order to remove possible adsorbed impurities from the
graphene surface, the first run of Raman measurements was carried
out. Raman spectra were acquired by means of a Jobin-Yvon U1000
Raman spectrometer equipped with a microscope (100X objective) and
with an Ar-Kr laser, using the excitation wavelength $\lambda$ =
514.5 nm. The incident laser power focused on the sample was
adjusted to be less than 5 mW, to avoid any local heating effect.
Various $N$-layer graphene flakes were analyzed, displaying the
standard $G$ and $2D$ bands reported in literature.The $D$ band at
$\sim$ 1350 cm$^{-1}$, related to lattice defects, was never
observed in the experiments, confirming the good quality of our
graphene samples. Moreover, the analysis of the monolayer spectra
($G$ peak at $\sim$ 1582 cm$^{-1}$ with FWHM $\sim$ 13 cm$^{-1}$)
indicates that the unintentional doping level in the pristine
samples was relatively low (about 1X10$^{12}$
cm$^{-2}$)~\cite{Pisana2007}.

Then, the samples were subjected to a radio frequency (RF) plasma
treatment in CHF$_{3}$ gas, and immediately (within a few minutes)
re-characterized by Raman spectroscopy.

\section{Results and Discussion}

\subsection{CHF$_{3}$ plasma}

Previous studies reported in literature ~\cite{Tachibana1999,
Hancock2001} have shown that the following radical species can be
found in a CHF$_{3}$ plasma: $F$ atoms and $CF_{x}$ ($x=1,2,3$)
radicals. In dry etching processes, $F$ atoms normally act as the
reactive species (responsible for the etching), whereas $CF_{x}$
radicals are passivation precursors giving rise to polymer
deposition. It has been observed that, in the case of CHF$_{3}$
plasma processes, the etch rate decreases with increasing flow (in
contrast with what happens in the case of CF$_{4}$ plasma), due to
the low concentration ratio $[F]/[CF_{x}]$ ~\cite{Choi2008}. This
means that the action of $F$ atoms becomes more effective with
decreasing the flow rate, because the passivating action of $CF_{x}$
radicals is reduced. In our experiments, we have observed an
increasing modification of the graphene Raman spectra, with
decreasing the flow rate in the plasma treatment.

In particular, we performed a preliminary study on monolayer
graphene processed at various CHF$_{3}$ flow rates. Fig.~\ref{f2}
shows that the plasma treatment induces a blue shift of both $G$ and
$2D$ peaks, which increases with decreasing the gas flow. Moreover,
below a flow rate threshold (about 6 SCCM), two new peaks arise at
about 1350 cm$^{-1}$ ($D$ peak) and 1620 cm$^{-1}$ ($D'$ peak),
which indicate the presence of defects in the $sp^{2}$ $C$ lattice.
Also the effect on the Raman spectra of $N$-layer graphenes, which
is going to be discussed in detail in the following Section, was
remarkably reduced with increasing the gas flow rate.

\begin{figure}
  \includegraphics{fig2}%
  \caption{Raman spectra of monolayer graphene after plasma treatments at various CHF$_{3}$ flow rates}\label{f2}
\end{figure}

In analogy with the mechanism involved in the etching processes, the
interaction of $F$ atoms with the graphene surface is likely reduced
at high flow rate, because of the passivating action of the $CF_{x}$
radicals. Therefore, the effect of CHF$_{3}$ plasma on graphene
Raman spectra can be ascribed to the adsorption of $F$ atoms on the
surface. With increasing the $F$ coverage, the modification of the
graphene properties becomes more important, passing from a p-type
doping effect (blue-shifted $G$ and $2D$ peaks) ~\cite{Das2008} to a
structural modification ($D$ and $D'$ peaks) at a very low flow rate
(less than 6 SCCM). The doping effect can be ascribed to an electron
transfer from graphene to adsorbed $F$ atoms, i.e. a mechanism
analogous to the observed charge transfer between graphene and
adsorbed $K$ atoms ~\cite{Ohta2006}. At very low gas flow, when the
passivating action of the $CF_{x}$ radicals is minimized, chemical
modification (fluorination) of graphene may eventually occur, with a
transition from $sp^{2}$ to $sp^{3}$ $C$ hybridization similar to
that observed in graphane formation by plasma hydrogenation
~\cite{Elias2009}. This evolution may be analogous to the transition
from semi-ionic to covalent $C-F$ bonding observed in carbon
nanotubes treated in $CF_{4}$ plasma ~\cite{Plank2003}.

Here, we discuss the results of processes carried out at a gas flow
of 6 SCCM (pressure of 100 mTorr) for 5 minutes, at RF power = 15 W.
Such experimental conditions lead to a very high doping, without
structural modification of the graphenes. Moreover, the symmetry of
stacked graphenes is broken by the dipole moment generated by the
charge transfer from graphene to the adsorbed $F$ atoms. Therefore,
the situation under study is very similar to that found in
field-effect experiments, and the results here reported may be
useful for the study of gated graphene-based devices.

\subsection{$G$ band splitting and electron-phonon coupling in $N$-layer graphene}

We focus now on the effect of top doping on the Raman $G$ band,
which displays very distinct features depending on the number $N$ of
stacked graphene layers. The change of the $G$ band induced by
plasma treatment in the various cases is visible in Fig.~\ref{f3},
where the spectra at $t_{0}$ and $t_{1}$ were acquired on the same
substrate before and immediately after the treatment, respectively.
The $G$ peak of monolayer graphene is largely blue-shifted (to
$\sim$ 1590 cm$^{-1}$) and narrowed (FWHM $\sim$ 6 cm$^{-1}$). Both
the observations are consistent with an increase of the doping
level, which induces a hardening of the mode, due to the
non-adiabatic removal of a Kohn anomaly for zone center optical
phonons ~\cite{Lazzeri2006}, and a reduction of the linewidth, due
to Pauli exclusion principle which inhibits phonon decay into
electron-hole pairs when the Fermi level surpasses half the phonon
energy ~\cite{Yan2007}. On the other hand, the bilayer and 4-layer
spectra display a very evident splitting of the $G$-mode, whereas
the behavior of trilayer spectrum is similar to that of monolayer.
These results have been confirmed on different flakes on the same
sample and on different samples.

\begin{figure*}
  \includegraphics{fig3}%
  \caption{(color online). Evolution of the Raman $G$ band of $N$-layer graphene after CHF$_{3}$ plasma treatment.
The spectra at $t_{0}$ were acquired before the treatment, while
those at $t_{i}$ ($1 \leq i \leq 6$) were taken at various time
intervals after the treatment ($t_{1}\sim 15 min$;$t_{2}\sim 6 h$;
$t_{3}\sim 24 h$; $t_{4}\sim 48 h$; $t_{5}\sim 72 h$; $t_{6}\sim 144
h$ ). The lines connecting peaks are guides for the eye.} \label{f3}
\end{figure*}

Furthermore, we observed that the modification induced by the plasma
treatment was not stable under ambient conditions, as the Raman
spectra changed with the passing of time, slowly tending to their
pristine form (Fig.~\ref{f3}). Indeed, the initial condition can be
restored by a vacuum annealing, so that the plasma treatment can be
repeated for several times in a reproducible way. Such a reversible
behavior is consistent with the absence of the $D$ peak, which
indicates the lack of structural modification of the material (in
contrast with the case of the chemical modification obtained by
plasma treatment at very low gas flow). As previously discussed, the
monolayer spectra, showing the hardening of both the $G$-mode and
the $2D$ mode, tell us that a strong $p$-type doping is achieved
~\cite{Das2008} upon plasma processing. Therefore, we were able to
gradually vary the doping level on top of each $N$-layer graphene,
studying the effect for different values of $N$.

The effect of charged adsorbates has already been studied on
epitaxial bilayer graphene on SiC by ARPES measurements
~\cite{Ohta2006}. It was shown that the electronic bands of bilayer
graphene are strongly affected by a potassium atoms coverage on the
top surface, due to the $n$-type doping induced by the adsorbates.
Indeed, because of the short screening length along the $c$-axis of
stacked graphenes ~\cite{Ohta2007}, the majority of the doping
charge is localized in the top layer and a dipole moment is formed,
giving rise to a symmetry breaking and to the consequent band gap
opening ~\cite{McCann2006}. In our case, an analogous effect is
likely to occur: the doping charge density rapidly decreases going
from the top layer to the bottom, thus altering the symmetry of the
multilayers. The symmetry breaking can affect very much the physical
properties of the system, as it eliminates the symmetry constraints
which rule both phonon Raman activity and EPC. In these conditions,
all phonon modes included in the $G$ band can become Raman active
and strongly mixed with each other ~\cite{Ando2009}, and the EPC is
affected by the modification of the electronic bands.

In Fig.~\ref{f3}, the $G$ band dependence on the doping is visible
in all cases, but it looks different for different $N$ values. An
estimation of the doping level may be obtained from monolayer
graphene spectra, basing on the $G$ peak position and linewidth, and
on the intensity ratio of the $G$ and $2D$ peaks ~\cite{Das2008},
but we have verified that different monolayers can display slightly
different $G$ peak positions on the same sample, due to the
difficulty of controlling the native doping of graphene in ambient
atmosphere ~\cite{Casiraghi2007}. Furthermore, monolayer graphene is
likely to have a different reactivity with respect to that of
few-layer graphene, as experimentally observed in the case of
hydrogenation ~\cite{Elias2009,Ryu2008}. Also in our experiments, we
have seen that, after plasma treatment at very low flow rate, the
$D$ peak is hardly observed in the few-layers spectra, whereas the
monolayer spectrum displays a very evident $D$ peak. Therefore, it
seems not correct to extrapolate the doping values from the
monolayer analysis to interpret the few-layer spectra. However,
although a precise quantitative estimate of carrier concentration in
each case is not possible in our experiments, we can monitor the
different behavior of $N$-layer graphene Raman spectra with
decreasing the top doping, starting from high doping levels (more
than $1\times10^{13} cm^{-2}$) as suggested by the analysis of
monolayers spectra.

The effect in the bilayer can be interpreted on the basis of some
recent literature. Indeed, the splitting of the Raman $G$ band was
recently observed in gated bilayer graphene ~\cite{Malard2008}, and
ascribed to the inversion symmetry breaking induced by the gate
field effect and to two distinct EPC involved in the $G$ band. This
is due to the fact that the $G$ band of bilayer graphene includes
two doubly degenerate modes, $E_{2g}$ and $E_{u}$, which are
symmetric and antisymmetric with respect to the inversion symmetry,
respectively. Consequently, only the $E_{2g}$ mode is normally Raman
active, unless inversion symmetry breaking switches the $E_{u}$ mode
on, too. It has been shown by Ando and Koshino ~\cite{Ando2009}
that, in the presence of asymmetry in the potential of the two
stacked layers, symmetric and antisymmetric modes are strongly mixed
with each other and two peaks appear in the Raman spectrum.
Moreover, phonons can be considerably modified by resonant
electronic interband transitions, when the asymmetry opens up a gap
comparable to the phonon energy. Ab initio calculations have been
performed to compute the $G$ band of bilayer graphene in asymmetric
conditions as a function of the carrier concentration in the top and
bottom layer ($n_{top}$ and $n_{bot}$) ~\cite{Gava2009}, predicting
the behavior of the two modes which become Raman visible at certain
values of $n_{top}$ and $n_{bot}$.

In Fig.~\ref{f4}, we report the analysis of the two Lorentzian peaks
which can fit the bilayer $G$ band at various stages of the plasma
modification, for two different samples. The experimental evolution
of the peaks position has been fitted by the theoretical curves
obtained from ref.~\cite{Gava2009}, assuming that about the $85\%$
of the total charge carriers is confined in the top layer, according
to ref.~\cite{Ohta2007}, and using the total carrier concentration
$n$ as the free parameter in the fitting. Then, the other spectral
features (intensity and linewidth) have been compared to the
behavior predicted in ref.~\cite{Gava2009}, considering the carrier
concentration values obtained from the best fit of the peaks
position curve. It can be seen that a good qualitative agreement is
obtained for all the analyzed parameters. In particular, the
threshold at about $n = 1\times10^{13} cm^{-2}$, after which a steep
variation of both the intensity and linewidth ratios is predicted by
theory, is well reproduced by the experimental data, thus confirming
the consistence of the carrier concentration results obtained by
fitting the peaks position curves. Therefore, the behavior of the
bilayer $G$ band is well interpreted in the framework of an
asymmetric carrier distribution model.

\begin{figure}
  \includegraphics{fig4}%
  \caption{Features of the two peaks fitting the bilayer $G$ band as a function of
  doping. Circles and triangles are experimental data from two
  different samples, and lines are the theoretical findings of
  Ref.~\cite{Gava2009}. In (a), the peaks positions
have been fitted by the theoretical curves, assuming that about the
$85\%$ of the total charge carriers is confined in the top layer. In
(b) and (c), the width and intensity ratios of the low (L) frequency
and high (H) frequency peak are reported.}\label{f4}
\end{figure}

In order to interpret the spectra for $N>2$, it is worth to
consider, first of all, the evolution of the $G$ band with $N$ as
predicted by group theory. Indeed, applying the group theory to
Bernal stacked graphene layers, the irreducible representations of
the infrared and Raman active modes at the $\Gamma$ point for
$N$-layer graphene can be obtained ~\cite{Jiang2008,Malard2009b}, as
listed in Table \ref{t1}. The modes related to the $G$ band are the
$E_{g}$, $E_{u}$, $E^{'}$ and $E^{''}$ in-plane modes, while the $A$
modes are related to out-of-plane phonons.

\begin{table}
  \centering
  \caption{Irreducible representations of the IR and Raman active modes at the $\Gamma$ point for $N$-layer graphene}\label{t1}
  \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|}
  \hline
  $N$ & $\Gamma^{IR}$ & $\Gamma^{Raman}$ \\
  \hline
  Even & $(N-1)A_{2u}\oplus(N-1)E_{u}$ & $NA_{1g}\oplus NE_{g}$ \\
  Odd & $NA_{2}^{''} \oplus NE^{'}$ & $(N-1)A^{'}_{1} \oplus NE^{'} \oplus (N-1)E^{''}$ \\
  \hline
\end{tabular}
\end{table}

$E_{g}$ and $E_{u}$ modes are found in case of inversion symmetry of
the system ($N$ even), whereas $E^{'}$ and $E^{''}$ modes appear for
mirror symmetry ($N$ odd). Importantly, only the inversion symmetry
inhibits the Raman activity of antisymmetric modes. It can be
obtained by ab initio calculations ~\cite{Saha2008} that in trilayer
graphene two $E^{'}$ modes and one $E^{''}$ mode can be found at the
G-band frequencies, whereas in 4-layer graphene two $E_{g}$ modes
and two $E_{u}$ modes vibrate at the $G$ band frequencies. The
inversion symmetry breaking, produced by the top doping, switches on
the previously Raman silent antisymmetric modes $E_{u}$ in $N$
even-layer graphene, so that all the phonon modes become Raman
active and mixed in $N$-layer graphene for every $N$ value.
Moreover, like in the bilayer case previously discussed, the EPC can
be strongly affected by the lack of symmetry constraints and by the
change of the electronic band structures.

The absence of splitting for trilayer graphene can be qualitatively
interpreted considering the allowed electronic interband transitions
which give rise to the phonon energy renormalization (Kohn anomaly)
when $E_{F} \sim 0$ (low doping). In Fig.~\ref{f5} it is shown that
both $E^{'}$ and $E^{''}$ phonons can couple with electronic
transitions when the Fermi level is at the Dirac point, whereas in
bilayer graphene only the symmetric $E_{g}$ mode can efficiently
create electron - hole pairs, due to energy conservation and
symmetry selection rules. Indeed, first principles calculations
~\cite{Yan2009b} have shown that in trilayer graphene the phonon
linewidths of symmetric and antisymmetric modes are all of the same
order of magnitude, whereas in the bilayer the antisymmetric
linewidth is two orders of magnitude smaller than that of the
symmetric mode. Therefore, almost the same EPC strength is expected
for the three phonon modes in trilayer graphene, giving rise to the
phonon energy renormalization at $E_{F}=0$ and to the consequent
hardening of all phonons with moving the Fermi level, like in
monolayer graphene. This is a qualitative different case with
respect to that of bilayer, where only the symmetric phonon energy
is renormalized at $E_{F}\sim0$. The presence or absence of the $G$
band splitting in the two cases reflects the presence or absence of
distinct EPC for phonons of distinct symmetry.

\begin{figure}
  \includegraphics{fig5}%
  \caption{(color online). Electronic transitions allowed by symmetry rules
in bilayer (left) and trilayer (right) graphene when
$\epsilon_{F}=0$.The electronic bands are taken from
Ref.~\cite{Koshino2009}. The transitions indicated by dotted lines
are not involved in the phonon energy renormalization, because their
energy is much higher than the $G$ band phonon energy
($\sim0.196eV$), which is reported as a scale bar on the
left.}\label{f5}
\end{figure}

The observation of splitting in the 4-layer spectrum suggests the
presence of distinct EPC for the different phonon modes in analogy
with the bi-layer behavior. In Fig.~\ref{f6} we show the
experimental position of the two lorentzian peaks fitting the
4-layer $G$ band, as a function of doping as obtained from the
bilayer analysis. It is worth noting that a minimum can be clearly
identified in the curve of the low frequency peak, indicating that a
maximum is likely to occur in the EPC for some phonon modes at a
given doping value ($n_{m} \simeq 9X10^{12} cm^{-2}$).
\begin{figure}
  \includegraphics{fig6}%
  \caption{(left) Electronic intraband transitions in 4-layer graphene
for $\epsilon_{F}=0.24 eV$. The electronic bands are taken from
Ref.~\cite{Koshino2009}, and the $G$ band phonon energy
($\sim0.196eV$) is reported as a scale bar. (right) Positions of the
two peaks fitting the splitted $G$ band of 4-layer graphene as a
function of doping. The observed dip may be related to a strong EPC
due to the intraband transitions shown on the left.}\label{f6}
\end{figure}
Such a feature can be interpreted by taking into account the band
structure of the 4-layer, which can be approximated by two bilayer
type band structures ~\cite{Koshino2009}. In particular, intraband
transitions occurring between two sub-bands separated by $\Delta E
\sim 0.24 eV$, which corresponds to an experimentally observed
absorption by IR spectroscopy ~\cite{Mak2009}, may give rise to an
almost resonant coupling with phonons ($E_{ph}\sim 0.2 eV$), and to
a consequently strong renormalization of phonon energy. This EPC is
expected to have a maximum when the Fermi level reaches the high
energy sub-band (see Fig.~\ref{f6}), when the number of possible
intraband transitions is maximized. Therefore, the doping value
$n_m$, at which a minimum for the Raman peak position is observed,
is likely to correspond to the Fermi energy touching the high energy
sub-band at $E_{F}\sim 0.24 eV$. A theoretical analysis of the
4-layer band structure and density of states in the presence of
asymmetric doping may confirm this hypothesis.

\section{Conclusions}
In summary, we have experimentally investigated the Raman $G$ band
for $N$-layer graphene ($1 \leq N \leq 4$) in the presence of high
asymmetric doping, finding two different types of behavior. For $N$
odd, the $G$ band is always fitted by a single lorentzian peak,
which is blue-shifted with increasing the doping level. This is due
to a strong EPC for all phonon modes when $E_{F}\sim 0$, which
decreases with increasing the Fermi energy. On the other hand, for
$N$ even, an evident splitting of the $G$ band is observed, related
to the presence of distinct EPC for phonons of distinct symmetry. In
particular, in the 4-layer case a signature of the van Hove
singularity at $E \sim 0.24 eV$ is likely to be observed as a
minimum of the low energy peak position.

Insights into the electron - phonon interactions in $N$- layer
graphenes in the presence of top doping can be useful for the study
of field effect graphene-based devices. Moreover, the $CHF_{3}$
plasma treatment may be a powerful technique for the study of
graphene in the presence of a coverage of highly electronegative
atoms such as fluorine.

Finally, the variety of the results reported in the literature about
the Raman $G$ band in heavily doped bilayer graphene
~\cite{Malard2008,Yan2008,Yan2009,Das2009} suggests that the
repartition of the additional charge carriers is not well understood
in most experiments. Therefore, suspended graphene samples may be a
good testbed to further investigate the distribution of the doping,
especially in the bilayer case.~\cite{Berciaud2009,Ni2009}

\section{acknowledgments}
This work was carried out within the EURAMET Joint Research Project
"ULQHE". The research within this EURAMET JRP receives funding from
the EC FP7, ERA-NET Plus, under Grant Agreement No. 217257.

Mesoscale and Nanoscale Physics (cond-mat.mes-hall); Materials Science (cond-mat.mtrl-sci)