The Quark-Gluon Plasma

Abstract: A Short Introduction

\section{States of Matter}

The quark-gluon plasma is a state of strongly interacting matter, in which
the quarks and gluons, which make up hadrons, are not longer confined to
color-neutral entities of hadronic size. What does that mean?

\medskip

Matter, in statistical mechanics, is a system of many constituents in
local thermal equilibrium -- i.e., a system whose average properties are
specified by a few global observables (temperature, energy density, net
``charge''). For different values of these observables, the system may
exhibit fundamentally different average properties, and so there exist
different states of matter, with ``phase'' transitions occurring when the
system changes from one state to the other. The classical pattern,
already proposed in both Greek and Hindu natural philosophy, has
the form shown in Fig.\ \ref{phases}. To
four fundamental states:
solid, liquid, gas and plasma, the vacuum is added as fifth element
(``quintessence''), providing the space in which matter exists. What are
the states of matter in the sub-atomic world of strong interactions?

\begin{figure}[htb]
\centerline{\epsfig{file=5phases.eps,width=7cm}}
\caption{Classical states of matter and transitions between them}
\label{phases}
\end{figure}

\vfill

\hrule width4cm

\vskip0.2cm

{* Student Day Lecture, {\sl 6th International Conference on
Physics and Astrophysics of Quark Gluon Plasma},
Dec.\ 5 - 10, 2010, Goa/India}

\newpage

To get a first idea, let us begin with a very simple
picture. If nucleons, with their given spatial extension, were both
elementary and incompressible, then a state of close packing would
constitute the high density limit of matter.
If, on the other hand, nucleons are really composite -- bound states
of point-like quarks --, then with increasing density they will start
to overlap, until eventually we reach a state in which each quark finds
within its immediate vicinity a considerable number of other quarks.
It has no way to identify which of these had been its partners in a
specific nucleon at some previous state of lower density. Beyond a
certain point, the concept of a hadron thus loses its meaning,
and we are quite naturally led from nuclear matter to a system whose
basic constituents are unbound quarks.

\medskip

More specifically, in confined matter the constituents are color-neutral
quark-antiquark or three-quark states of hadronic size (radius $\sim$ 1 fm).
The quarks inside a hadron polarize the surrounding gluonic medium; the
resulting gluon cloud around each quark provides it with a
dynamically generated effective mass of about 300 MeV. In an ideal version
of QCD, with massless quarks in the Lagrangian, this corresponds to
spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking.

\medskip

Confined hadronic matter exists in two distinct forms. At vanishing or
low baryon number density, it consists largely of mesons, since the
higher baryon mass reduces, through the Boltzmann factor, the baryonic
thermodynamic weight. The interaction between mesons as well as that
between mesons and baryons is resonance-dominated, i.e., it consists
essentially of the abundant formation of multi-meson and meson-baryon
resonances. Mesons appear to allow arbitrary overlap,
so all (light quark) hadron states have the same characteristic
size, with a radius of about 1 fm, independent of their mass. Nucleons,
on the other hand, experience a short range repulsion in addition to
a longer range attraction. The latter, the nuclear force, binds nucleons
to nuclei, while the former leads to a nuclear volume linear in the
total number of nucleons. This implies that nucleons, also with
a hadronic radius of about 1 fm, have an effective hard core of about
half that size. Both these forces are of non-resonant nature, so that
the interaction in baryonic matter at low temperature and high density
is thus quite different from that of mesonic matter. Nevertheless, in
each case we have with increasing density, be it through ``heating''
or ``compression'', a cluster formation which eventually leads to more
quarks per hadronic volume than meaningful for a partioning into
color-neutral hadrons. In other words, increasing of the temperature
$T$ or the baryochemical potential $\mu$ results eventually in color
deconfinement. What happens in this transition?

\medskip

On one hand, the color-neutral states are dissolved, producing a medium
of color-charged constituents. The deconfinement transition is thus the
QCD counterpart of the insulator-conductor transition of atomic physics.
In addition, a sufficient increase of the temperature results eventually
in a ``melting'' of the gluon cloud which surrounds the quarks inside
a hadron. Hadronic matter thus shows two transitions, deconfinement and
chiral symmery restoration. Do these two phenomena necessariy coincide?

\medskip

Rather general basic arguments \cite{B-C} show that they either occur
at the same point or if not, deconfinement precedes chiral symmetry
restoration. A simplistic justification is given by the fact that any
$r$-dependent confinement potential breaks chiral symmetry - a
reflection of the quark at the potential wall does not flip its spin.

\medskip

It is thus possible that quarks, when they become deconfined, still
maintain their effective mass up to some higher temperature or density.
Lattice calculations have shown that for vanishing baryon density,
deconfinement and chiral symmetry restoration do in fact coincide,
indicating that the deconfinement temperature is sufficient to melt the
effective quark mass. For high baryon density at low temperature, this
seems not likely, allowing a medium of massive quarks as an additional
state of strongly interacting matter, in addition to hadronic matter
and the plasma of deconfined massless quarks and gluons \cite{CGS}.

\medskip

In any case, deconfinement does not result in a non-interacting medium;
in section 3, we shall return in detail to the strong interaction in the
QGP in the region above the onset of deconfinement. Here we only note
that in particular the anti-triplet quark-quark interaction provides
an attractive force, making possible the existence of diquarks as
localized bound states. Such colored bosonic states can condense and
therefore form a color superconductor as yet another state of strongly
interacting matter. Putting everything together gives us the
phase diagram shown in Fig.\ \ref{phase-diagram}.

\begin{figure}[h]
\centerline{\psfig{file=4phaseb.eps,width=7cm}}
\caption{Speculative phase diagram of strongly interacting matter}
\label{phase-diagram}
\end{figure}

\medskip

After this discussion, meant to show how the QGP fits into the general
context of strong interaction thermodynamics, we shall now turn to its
study in the low baryon number regime.  Here extensive lattice calculations
provide much information; moreover, this is also the region of relevance
for RHIC and LHC experiments.

\section{From Hadronic Matter to QGP}

The simplest form of confined matter is an ideal gas of massless pions,
whose pressure is given by
\begin{equation}
P_{\pi} = {\pi^2 \over 90}~3~ T^4 \simeq {1\over 3}~ T^4,
\label{piongas}
\end{equation}
taking into account the three possible pion charge states. For deconfined
matter, we have as simplest case an ideal quark-gluon plasma (two
massless quark flavors, two quark and two gluon spin orientations,
$q$ and $\bar q$; three quark and eight gluon color degrees of freedom),
giving
\begin{equation}
P_{QGP} = {\pi^2 \over 90}~ \{~\!2\times 8 + {7 \over 8}~ [ 2 \times 2
 \times 2 \times 3 ]~\!\}~ T^4 - B  \simeq 4~T^4 - B
\label{qgp}
\end{equation}
for the pressure, with $B$ denoting the ``bag pressure'' excerted by
the physical vacuum on the colored medium. The two forms of the pressure
are compared in Fig. \ref{comp} (left).

\begin{figure}[htp]
\centerline{\psfig{file=ideal2.eps,width=6cm} \hspace*{2cm}
\psfig{file=energy.eps,width=5.6cm}}
\caption{Pressures and energy densities for an ideal pion gas compared
to an ideal QGP}
\label{comp}
\end{figure}

\medskip

Since nature always chooses the state of highest pressure
(lowest free energy), this implies a phase transition from a pion gas
at low $T$ to a QGP at high $T$. The critical temperature is obtained
from $P_{\pi}=P_{QGP}$, leading to $T_c^4\simeq 0.3~B$ and hence
$T_c \simeq 150$ MeV, if we use $B^{1/4} \simeq 200$ MeV, as obtained
from quarkonium spectroscopy. The corresponding energy densities become
$\epsilon_{\pi} \simeq T^4$ and $\epsilon_{QGP}\simeq 12~T^4 + B$. leading to the
form shown in Fig.\ \ref{comp} (right).

\medskip

The transition in this model is by construction of first order; at $T_c$,
the energy density changes abruptly by the latent heat of deconfinement.
For an ideal gas of massless constituents, the energy density and pressure
are related by $\epsilon=3P$; in such a conformal world, the temperature is
the only scale. In our case, the interaction measure
\begin{equation}
\Delta \equiv {\epsilon - 3P \over T^4} = {4B \over T^4}
\label{inter}
\end{equation}
is definitely not zero; even in this simplistic model, the QGP is
non-conformal (with $B$ as external scale) and strongly interacting
for $T_c \leq T < 3-4~T_c$.

\medskip

To turn from model to theory, we want to derive the thermodynamics
obtained with QCD as dynamical input. The only possible {\sl ab initio}
calculations are based on the computer simulation \cite{Creutz}
of the lattice regularization of QCD \cite{Wilson}. We therefore summarize
the main results thus obtained in finite temperature lattice QCD.

\medskip

In Fig.\ \ref{edens} we show the temperature behavior of the energy
density for the cases of 2, 2+1 and 3 light quark flavors \cite{KLP};
here 2+1 means one heavy
and two light quarks. The sudden jump corresponding to the latent heat
of deconfinement is quite evident. It is found to occur at a critical
temperature of about 160 - 180 MeV, and the energy density at that point
is around 0.5 to 1.0 GeV/fm$^3$.

\begin{figure}[htb]
\vspace*{-0.5cm}
\centerline{\epsfig{file=ledens.eps,width=8cm}}
\caption{Lattice results for
energy density vs.\ temperature in QCD thermodynamics \cite{KLP}}
\label{edens}
\end{figure}

\medskip

To relate this ``jump'' more specifically to some form of critical
behavior, we consider the corresponding order parameters for deconfinement
and for chiral symmetry restoration. Such parameters signal the onset of
the new phase.

\medskip

For deconfinement, the order parameter is given by the
average value of the Polyakov loop \cite{Larry},
\begin{equation}
\langle L(T) \rangle \sim \exp\{-F_{Q\bar Q}(T)/T\},
\label{polya}
\end{equation}
where $F_{Q\bar Q}(T)$ denotes the free energy of a static $Q{\bar Q}$ pair
at infinite separation. In a confining medium, this diverges
($F_{Q\bar Q}(r,T)
 \sim \sigma r$), while in a deconfined medium, screening prevents
communication between the $Q$ and the $\bar Q$ beyond a certain distance,
so that $F_{Q\bar Q}$ remains finite. As a result,
\begin{equation}
L(T)
~\left\{\matrix{=0 & T < T_L ~~~{\rm confinement}\cr
~&~\cr
\not= 0 &  ~~T > T_L~~~{ \rm deconfinement}\cr}
\right\}
\end{equation}
defines the deconfinement temperature $T_L$. Actually, $\langle L(T) \rangle$
vanishes exactly for $T < T_L$ only in the case of infinitely heavy quarks;
for finite quark mass, the string binding $Q$ and $\bar Q$ breaks when the
potential surpasses the spontaneous pair formation threshold. As a result,
$\langle L(T) \rangle$ is very small but finite for $T < T_L$.

\medskip

The breaking of chiral symmetry is indicated by a finite value of the
chiral condensate $\chi(T) \equiv \langle \bar{\psi} \psi \rangle \sim M_q$,
which measures the dynamically generated  (``constituent'') quark mass $M_q$,
obtained for a Lagrangian with massless quarks. At high temperature, this
mass melts, so that
\begin{equation}
\chi(T)
~\left\{\matrix{\not=0 & T<T_{\chi}~~ {\rm chiral~symmetry~broken}\cr
~&~\cr
=0 & ~T > T_{\chi} ~~{\rm chiral~symmetry~restored}\cr}
\right\}
\end{equation}
defines the chiral symmetry restoration temperature $T_{\chi}$. Here
we have exact chiral symmetry only if the input quarks are massless;
for finite quark mass, the symmetry remains explicitly broken, so that then
$\chi(T)$ only becomes very small for $T > T_{\chi}$.

\medskip

Both $\langle L(T) \rangle$ and $\chi(T)$ have been studied extensively
in finite temperature lattice QCD at vanishing overall baryon number.
The corresponding susceptibilities (derivatives with respect to $T$)
peak sharply, defining $T_L$ and $T_{\chi}$, and within errors, the
two temperatures and hence the two phenomena (deconfinement and chiral
symmetry restoration) coincide. The critical temperature for the
resulting transition
from hadronic matter to QGP, for two light quark flavors, is thus determined
as $T_c \simeq 175$ MeV.

\medskip

It was clear from the very first finite temperature lattice studies that
the deconfined medium in the region above $T_c$ is very strongly interacting
and thus quite far from an ideal plasma \cite{inter-plasma}. This is best
seen from the interaction measure (the trace of energy-momentum tensor),
defined as
\begin{equation}
\Delta = {\epsilon - 3P \over T^4}.
\label{interaction}
\end{equation}
For non-interacting massless constituents (the ``conformal'' limit),
$\Delta \equiv 0$, so that the temperature is the only scale. The
quarks and gluons of QCD are ideally massless, but the so-called
trace anomaly violates conformality and introduces a dimensional
scale. The behavior of $\Delta(T)$ is shown in Fig.\ \ref{delta}
both in pure gauge theory for different color groups and for full
QCD with different flavor content.

\medskip

\begin{figure}[htb]
\centerline{\epsfig{file=scalingcernL.eps,width=7cm}\hskip1.5cm
\epsfig{file=delta.eps,width=7.4cm}}
\label{delta}
\caption{Interaction measure in $SU(3)$ gauge theory (left)
\cite{DG} and full QCD (right) \cite{KLP}.}
\end{figure}

\section{The Strongly Interacting QGP}

For sufficiently high temperature, asymptotic freedom is expected to
result in an ideal QGP. How high does $T$ have to be in order to allow
some form of a weak coupling expansion (perturbation theory) to describe
the approach to this limit?

\medskip

Infrared divergences limit the perturbative expansion of QCD to $O(g^5)$
\cite{Linde}. The evaluation up to this order has been carried out
\cite{Arnold} and is found to result in strongly oscillating and hence
non-convergent behavior for $T \leq 10~T_c$.

\medskip

This has led to considerable efforts to ``repair'' the difficulty,
either by introducing non-perturbative scale effects to allow a systematic
extension of perturbation theory beyond  $O(g^5)$ \cite{Laine}, or
by regrouping sets of Feynman diagrams to expand around a ground state
including screening effects (``resummed'' perturbation theory \cite{resum},
hard thermal loop approach \cite{HTL}). In both cases, however, such
weak-coupling methods cannot account for the behavior observed in lattice
studies. This holds in particular for $SU(3)$ gauge theory, where one
has results for the continuum limit \cite{Boyd}; see Fig.\ \ref{HTL} (left)
for a comparision to HTL results. It is obvious that no
weak-coupling approach can account for the critical behavior near $T_c$
(the dip of $\Delta(T)$ as $T\to T_c$); but also the behavior in the region
up to about 5 $T_c$, with $T^2 \Delta(T) \simeq {\rm const.}$, is not
reproduced by the weak logarithmic form of perturbative studies.

\begin{figure}[h]
\centerline{\psfig{file=nstrick.eps,width=5.8cm,height=3.9cm}\hskip1.5cm
\epsfig{file=fitbag.eps,width=6.2cm,height=4cm}}
\caption{Interaction measure in $SU(3)$ gauge theory \cite{Boyd}, compared
to (left) HTL resummed perturbation theory \cite{HTL}, and (right)
bag model prediction \cite{CMS}.}
\label{HTL}
\end{figure}
\medskip

The simplest non-perturbative approach, using the bag model form discussed
above, does not fare any better. The bag pressure can be related to the
gluon condensate $G^2_0$ at $T=0$ \cite{Leutwyler}, and using numerical
estimates for the latter \cite{SVZ}, one obtains a $\Delta(T)$ vanishing
as $T^{-4}$ and thus much too fast; moreover, the critical dip near
$T_c$ is also here not given (see Fig.\ \ref{HTL} (right)).

\medskip

We thus need to find a more detailed way to account for the non-perturbative
behavior observed in the region $T_c \leq T \leq 5~\!T_c$. One such
possibility is given by the quasi-particle approach, first applied to
$SU(2)$ gauge theory \cite{Golo93}. The basic idea is that in the deconfined
medium, gluons acquire an effective  mass by polarizing the colored medium
around them. In the critical region, as $T \to T_c$ from above, the
correlation length $\xi(T)$ increases strongly or diverges, so that the gluon
sees and polarizes more and more of the medium, increasing its mass.
Outside the critical region, for $T \geq 1.3~\!T_c$, as $T$ increases
further, the correlation length decreases essentially as $T^{-1}$; now,
however, the energy density $\epsilon(T)$ increases (as $T^4$), so that the effective
mass $M_g \sim \epsilon \times \xi \sim T$ also grows. These two competing
modes lead to a growth of $M_g$ for $T \to T_c$ determined by the
critical behavior and a conformal growth at high temperature. The dip
in $M_g(T)$ around $T \sim 1.3~\!T_c$ defines the transition from critical
behavior to hot QGP. Applying this approach to the continuum limit of
$SU(3)$ gauge theory leads to excellent agreement, for he interaction measure
as well as for the energy density, in both the critical
region and in the hot QGP \cite{CMS}.

\medskip

We conclude that in the region of main interest to us, for $T_c \leq
T \leq 3 - 5~\!T_c$, the QGP is strongly interacting. The interaction
provides the constituents with a temperature-dependent effective mass,
so that a considerable part of any energy input goes into mass rather
than into kinetic energy. As a result of this, the behavior of the
equation of state is highly non-ideal and in fact not unlike that
just below $T_c$, where abundant resonance formation restricts the
fraction of energy available for kinetic purposes.

\section{Probing the QGP}

At sufficiently high temperatures and/or densities, strongly interacting
matter thus becomes a plasma of deconfined, colored quarks and gluons.
How can we probe the properties of this medium and study its behavior
as function of temperature and density? This is a highly non-trivial
problem, and I want to outline here briefly three ways of addressing it.
We assume that we are given a macroscopic volume of deconfined strongly
interacting matter and want to determine its state for different
temperatures. This means that we shall consider equilibrium thermodynamics
only, leaving out all the phenomena (collisions effects, time dependence,
equilibration, flow) that make the analysis of actual nuclear collisions
data so complex.

\medskip

The given medium is by assumption hotter than its environment (the vacuum)
and hence emits radiation. An outside observer will detect the emission
of light hadrons; however, these cannot exist in the interior of the QGP
and hence must be formed through hadronization at the cooler surface.
Such radiation will therefore provide information about the hadronization
stage of the QGP, but not about the pre-hadronic state in the interior.
In the hot QGP itself, quark-gluon interactions and quark-antiquark
annihilation produce real and virtual photons, respectively, and these
will leave the medium without further strong interaction. They can thus
provide information about the state of the medium when they were formed,
i.e., about the hot QGP \cite{em-radiation}. The difficulty is that they
can be formed at
all evolution stages of the medium, even in the hadronic phase, and so
one has to find a way to identify hot thermal electromagnetic radiation.
If this can be achieved, such radiation provides a thermometer for the
medium.

\medskip

Alternative tools are obtained by testing the medium with external
probes. In particular, we can study the effect of the medium on
quarkonia or on jets. Both will interact strongly in a deconfined medium
and less or not at all with hadronic matter; thus they can provide information
on the temperature and/or density of the QGP.

\medskip

Quarkonia are bound states of heavy quark-antiquark pairs
($c\bar c, b \bar b$). They
are much smaller than ``light'' hadroncs ($r_Q \ll r_h \sim 1$ fm) and
much more tightly bound, with binding energies up to 0.5 to 1.0 GeV. Therefore
they can survive in a QGP up to temperature above the deconfinement
point and ``melt'' only when the color screening radius has dropped to
quarkonium size \cite{MS}. Since the different quarkonium states have
different sizes and binding energies, since will lead to a ``sequential''
suppression of quarkonia: first, the larger and more loosely bound
excited states are dissolved, finally the small and tightly bound
ground states. For charmonia, this is illustrated in Fig.\ 7,
with $\psi'$~and $\chi_c$~melting followed eventually by that of the $J/\psi$.
Such patterns can provide a spectral analysis of the
QGP, similar to that obtained for the sun by solar spectra
\cite{KS}.

\medskip

\begin{figure}[htb]
~\hskip2cm{\psfig{file=charm1.eps,width=6cm}}
\end{figure}

\begin{figure}[htb]
\vspace*{-4.7cm}
\hfill{\psfig{file=charm2.eps,width=6.1cm}}~~~~~
\label{spectral}
\caption{The spectral analysis of the QGP through charmonium states}
\end{figure}

Jets are fast partons (quarks or gluons) passing through the medium.
They are colored and hence interact stronger with a QGP than with
color-neutral hadronic matter. A substantial attenuation (``quenching'')
of jets thus indicates the presence of a dense deconfined medium
\cite{Bj,Schiff}.

\medskip

We had called quarkonia and jets ``external'' probes. It is clear,
however, that they have to be produced in the same collision which
leads to the QGP candidate to be probed. They are, however, produced
through very early hard interactions, which take place before the
QGP is formed. We can then study the subsequent effect of the QGP
on their behavior. Moreover, their initial production is to a large
extent calculable by perturbative QCD, and it can be gauged in the
study of $pp$ and $pA$ collisions, which presumably do not produce
a QGP.

\section{Three Questions to the LHC}

The QGP predicted by statistical QCD is the ultimate state of matter
to be studied in high energy nuclear collisions. This is a speculative
endeavor, since it is not clear to what extent such collisions can
produce something to be called matter. We therefore close our survey
with three questions to the next generation of experiments which might
help us in finding an answer to this fundamental enigma.

\medskip

If an increase of collision energy indeed leads to the production of a
hotter bubble of deconfined primordial matter, then this must expand more
in order to reach the hadronization temperature, and hence the source size
for hadron emission must become larger. In particular, it is expected to
increase as a power of the hadron multiplicity, since this in turn grows
with the initial energy density \cite{Stock}. So far, from AGS to RHIC,
the source size for hadron emission, as determined by Hanbury-Brown--Twiss
(HBT) methods \cite{HBT} used in astrophysics, has not shown a significant
increase \cite{Beca}.
This ``HBT-puzzle'' has been accounted for in terms of the relative role
of meson and baryon production \cite{Adamova02}, but at LHC energies, a
clear increase of the source volume is predicted. Such an increase seems
necessary in a model-independent way, if the concept of hot primordial
fireball production in nuclear collisions is to make any sense.

\medskip

We had noted that momentum spectra for real and virtual photons can in
principle provide an internal thermometer of the QGP, with
\begin{equation}
(dN_{\gamma}/dk_T) \sim \exp\{-k_T/T\}
\end{equation}
A recent analysis of RHIC $Au\!-\!Au$ data at $\sqrt s=200$ GeV
\cite{phenix} has identified possible thermal photons,
seen in a transverse momentum window between pion decay and prompt
photon spectra.
The corresponding temperature is with
$T=221 \pm 19({\rm stat.}) \pm 19({\rm syst.})$ MeV above the
hadronization value of about 175 MeV. If such thermal photons are
indeed observable, the LHC should lead to much higher temperatures
for electromagnetic radiation.

\medskip

The last question addresses quarkonium production in nuclear collisions
at the LHC. The $J/\psi$~production rate in $Au-Au$ collisions at RHIC is
compatible with that for central collisions at the SPS, once cold
nuclear matter effects are taken into account. The remaining survival
rate of about 50 \% is in accord with suppression of the higher
excited states ($\psi'$~and $\chi_c$) and survival of the direct $J/\psi$~\cite{KKS}.
The much higher energy density of the LHC should dissociate also the
latter, leading to complete $J/\psi$~suppression (modulo $B$ decay and corona
production). The expected survival pattern is illustrated in Fig. \ref{seq}.

\begin{figure}[htb]
\centerline{\psfig{file=ncompare.eps,width=6.5cm}}
\caption{Sequential $J/\psi$~suppression vs.\ statistical $J/\psi$~regeneration}
\label{seq}
\end{figure}

\medskip

Here, however, an alternative scenario has been proposed \cite{regen}
and much discussed. Charm production in nuclear collisions, as a hard
process, increases with collision energy much faster than that of
light quarks. At sufficiently high energy, the produced medium will
therefore contain more charm quarks than present in a QGP at ``chemical''
equilibrium. If these charm and anticharm quarks combine at the
hadronization point statistically to form charmonium states, this new
combination mechanism should lead to a much enhanced $J/\psi$~production rate,
even if all primary (``direct'') $J/\psi$'s are dissociated.
The two predictions, sequential suppression vs.\ statistical
regeneration, thus present two really opposite patterns, and first
LHC results should be able to distinguish between them. It should be
emphasized that statistical recombination would on one hand provide
clear evidence for the presence of a thermal medium, including even
charm quarks. On the other, it presupposes a ``new'' statistical
charmonium production mechanism, quite distinct from the hard
production forms generally discussed, in which only $c\bar c$ pairs
at very short separation can bind to form a $J/\psi$.

\section{Summary}

We have seen that in strong interaction thermodynamics, there exists
at vanishing baryon density a well-defined transition, in which
\vspace*{-0.2cm}
\begin{itemize}
\item{color deconfinement sets in and chiral symmetry is restored,}
\vspace*{-0.2cm}
\item{the energy density increases by the latent heat of deconfinement;}
\vspace*{-0.2cm}
\item{the critical temperature $T_c$ is about $175 \pm 10$ MeV.}
\vspace*{-0.1cm}
\end{itemize}
For $T > T_c$, the state of matter is a plasma of deconfined quarks and
gluons, which can be probed by
\vspace*{-0.2cm}
\begin{itemize}
\item{electromagnetic radiation,}
\vspace*{-0.2cm}
\item{quarkonium spectra,}
\vspace*{-0.2cm}
\item{jet quenching.}
\vspace*{-0.1cm}
\end{itemize}
A more extensive survey of QCD thermodynamics will appear soon
\cite{Springer}. -- Finally, we have given three rather model-independent
bench-marks for a QGP
study through very high energy nuclear collisions,
\vspace*{-0.2cm}
\begin{itemize}
\item{does the source size (finally) increase with collision energy?}
\vspace*{-0.2cm}
\item{does the thermal photon
temperature increase with collision energy?}
\vspace*{-0.2cm}
\item{does quarkonium production show sequential suppression or
statistical regeneration?}
\end{itemize}
\vspace*{-0.1cm}
The LHC should be able to provide some first answers to these question within
the first year of heavy ion operation.

Abstract: A Short Introduction

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology (hep-ph)

The Quark-Gluon Plasma


Issues in the Formation of Globular Cluster Systems

Abstract: Recent developments relevant to the formation of globular cluster systems in galaxies are discussed, including (1) The age distribution of the oldest Milky Way clusters, (2) Subgroups and possible accretion and merger remnants in the Galactic halo, (3) Key features of globular cluster systems in giant elliptical galaxies (metallicity distribution functions, luminosity distribution functions, specific frequencies). Processes contributing to the formation of giant ellipticals are summarized.

\section{Cluster Ages in the Milky Way Halo}

Globular clusters
make up less than 1\% of the visible halo stars.  These, in turn,
form only a few percent of all the mass present
in the potential well of a large galaxy.
However, these
ancient star systems contain information about the history of halo
formation out of all proportion to their fraction of the total mass.
The literature on globular cluster systems in the Milky Way and
other galaxies is now far too large to summarize in one short review,
so I will concentrate only on a few recent issues that
have taken on particular importance.

Within our own Milky Way, globular cluster {\it ages} have once again
taken center stage in the debate over halo formation.
With continuing in stellar physics and evolution codes,
the best estimates
of absolute ages for the oldest globular clusters have undergone modest
downward revisions.  A very considerable factor helping to drive them
in this direction has been the appearance of the {\it Hipparcos} parallaxes,
with much new information on field-star subdwarfs used to
calibrate globular cluster distances (e.g., Reid 1997; Gratton et al.
1997; Pont et al. 1997).
This new material, though important, has not yet settled the distance
calibration issue; early reports of resulting cluster ages as low as
10 Gyr are not being borne out by subsequent studies, and it may
not be too early to suggest an emerging new consensus of theory
and observation around  $\tau \simeq (13 \pm 1)$ Gyr for
the oldest, most metal-poor halo clusters.

Independently of absolute age calibrations, we can estimate
the {\it duration} of the halo formation era by finding
{\it relative} cluster ages from widely different parts of the halo
and over the full range of cluster metallicities.  With present-day
high precision main sequence photometry, these relative
ages can be gauged to within $\pm 0.5$ Gyr for clusters of similar
compositions.  Various recent discussions (Richer et al. 1996;
Chaboyer et al. 1996; Bruzual et al. 1997)
suggest that there is an overall age-metallicity relation, with
the more metal-rich clusters (47 Tuc and the others like it)
being $\sim 2$ Gyr younger on average than the most metal-poor
(and presumably oldest) ones like M92 and M15.
But perhaps surprisingly, we are discovering
that the ages of the {\it lowest}-metallicity clusters
are identical to within measurement precision everywhere in the halo
from Galactocentric distances of $\sim 5$ kpc out to $\sim 100$ kpc
(see Figure~\ref{fig-1}).
\begin{figure}
\plotfiddle{Harris.fig1.ps}{2.50in}{0}{60}{50}{-185}{-110}
\caption{Ages of low-metallicity ([Fe/H] $ \,{}^<_\sim\,  -1.8$) globular
clusters in the Milky Way; data from Harris et al. (1997a) and
Richer et al. (1996).  The zeropoint of the age scale is adopted
as 13 Gyr (see text).  The circled cross denotes M54, the
largest and most metal-poor globular cluster in the Sgr dwarf
(Layden \& Sarajedini 1997). Relative age uncertainties
average $\pm1$ Gyr per cluster (cf. Harris et al. 1997a).} \label{fig-1}
\end{figure}
The most recent and telling comparisons of this type
are by Harris et al. (1997a, for the remote-halo cluster
NGC 2419 versus the inner-halo clusters of similar metallicity).

The implications is that,
all over the protogalaxy which would eventually evolve into the
Milky Way, globular cluster and halo-star formation began at
virtually the same time.  This volume is now almost 200 kpc
in diameter.  How can we fit this in to the overwhelming
evidence for a lumpy formation history and the buildup of the
halo from many pieces (see below)?  This upper end to
the cluster age distribution may simply be telling us that any of
the pregalactic `pieces' (dwarf-sized $10^8 - 10^9 M_{\odot}$ gas clouds)
could have begun building stars at about the same time after they emerged from
the recombination era and began collecting into the protogalactic
potential wells.  These protodwarfs (or SGMC's; see
Harris \& Pudritz 1994; McLaughlin \& Pudritz 1996)
are exactly the right environments for the buildup of
protoglobular clusters, a process which should take
a few $\times 10^8$ years, regardless of location within the halo.

High precision new calibrations of the relative ages of clusters,
based firmly on deep main-sequence photometry, are continuing
to accumulate.  Within a few years the long-sought goal of a complete
{\it age profile} for the Galactic halo may be within our grasp.
With it may come the first unequivocal solution to the famous
`second-parameter' problem affecting the color-magnitude distributions
of stars in the diagrams of the metal-poor clusters, which have long
been suspected to be due primarily to age differences (e.g. Lee et al. 1994).

\section{The Deconstructionist Halo}

Kinman (1959) first demonstrated that the Milky Way globular cluster
system contained at least two kinematically distinct subgroups which
also differed in mean metallicity.
The landmark paper of Zinn (1985) strongly reinforced this conclusion
with considerable new data, and related it
in modern terms to the probable formation histories of the different
metallicity groups.   The case for two major subpopulations builds
from what is now seen to be a remarkably
common phenomenon of halo cluster systems in other galaxies:  a {\it bimodal
metallicity distribution} (Figure~\ref{fig-2}).
\begin{figure}
\plotfiddle{Harris.fig2.ps}{3.00in}{0}{70}{70}{-195}{-135}
\caption{Metallicity distribution for all globular clusters in
the Milky Way, with recent data from Harris (1996).  Gaussian curves
are shown with $\sigma$[Fe/H] = 0.3 and peaks at [Fe/H] $ = -1.6,
-0.6$.} \label{fig-2}
\end{figure}
In the Milky Way, the clusters more metal-poor
than [Fe/H] $\sim -1.0$ define what we traditionally think of as the ``normal halo'',
with a Gaussian-like metallicity distribution centered at [Fe/H] $ = -1.6$
and little or no systemic rotation, closely resembling the field halo stars.
By contrast, the metal-richer subpopulation ([Fe/H] $> -1.0$) carries a
significant overall rotation, and (if the best current age estimates are correct)
may be younger on average by up to 2 Gyr than the metal-poor halo.
Zinn (1985) and Armandroff (1989) favored interpreting these clusters
as a disk system, possibly identified with the stellar thick disk,
and most workers have referred to them collectively as
``disk clusters'' since.  However, this
identification is very much open to debate.  Minniti (1995)
has pointed out that the kinematics of the metal-richer clusters, coupled with
their rather restricted space distribution in the innermost few kpc, may
be more consistent with a bulge-like population rather than the thick disk.
\begin{figure}
\plotfiddle{Harris.fig3.ps}{2.60in}{0}{70}{60}{-200}{-140}
\caption{Radial velocities for metal-rich globular clusters in the
Milky Way, with data from Harris (1996).  Here $v_r$ is the velocity
relative to a stationary point at the Sun; in this graph, a constant
$v_{rot}$ appears as a straight line (see Zinn 1985 for definition
of the angle $\psi$).  The solid line is $v_{rot} = 160$ km/s.
Higher-weight points are plotted with larger
symbols; the open circles are those clusters claimed
by Burkert \& Smith (1997) to be in a barlike configuration.}
\label{fig-3}
\end{figure}

Figure~\ref{fig-3} shows the kinematical distribution.
The small number of objects, the internal scatter, and the effects of
distance errors for these highly reddened clusters
(which make the actual positions of many points in the graph
highly uncertain and thus of low weight) would allow any $v_{rot}$
within the range of $\sim100$ to 200 km/s, which could be either
bulge-like or disk-like.
To cloud the issue further, Burkert \& Smith (1997) claim
that some of these inner clusters (those with the
most positive radial velocities
and smallest longitudes) may form a bar-like system embedded in
the bulge.  Unfortunately these same
objects tend to be among the ones with the worst
known distances and reddenings.

Whether or not the clusters truly represent any subpopulation
of the field {\it stars} is, once again, closely connected with ages.
Holtzman et al. (1993) estimate that the bulge stars
have a mean age near 10 Gyr on a scale where the inner globular clusters are
13 Gyr.  A very similar $\sim 3-4$ Gyr difference between field stars
and clusters is found by Layden \& Sarajedini (1997) for the Sagittarius
dwarf elliptical.  If the Milky Way halo was built from the amalgamation
of many such pieces, the evidence suggests
that the clusters had a considerable
head start, and were present for a long time while most of the
Galaxy's raw material was still gaseous.  Earlier arguments
(see Harris 1991) based on space distributions, free-fall times,
and metallicity enrichment timescales, had suggested
that globular clusters might be
generically older by perhaps $\sim1$ Gyr than the
bulk of the halo in most large galaxies -- quite a bit less than
the direct age differences now emerging from the new color-magnitude studies.

Attempts have also been made to deconstruct the metal{\it-poor}
cluster population into distinct subgroups.  Morphological differences in
the color-magnitude diagrams certainly correlate with galactocentric distance
(the second-parameter problem; e.g. Lee et al. 1994),
and may correlate with age and kinematics.  One suggested subgroup may even
have a retrograde net rotation, and it is at least possible that it may
represent a particularly large satellite accretion event
(Rodgers \& Paltoglou 1984; Zinn 1993; van den Bergh 1993).
Better and more direct age information should help to evaluate the range
of possibilities.

The importance of the cluster/field-star age offset is considerable.
There appears to have been
plenty of time after the initial burst of globular cluster formation for
the leftover and newly enriched gas -- which in fact
was {\it most} of the Galaxy`s raw material --
to mix, dissipate, recollect into new clouds, and recollapse before beginning
new and more substantial bursts of star formation that gave rise to the bulge,
the thick disk, and eventually the thin disk.  By that time, much of its memory of the
initial state from the cluster-forming epoch would have been thoroughly
erased as it evolved into different subpopulations.  Thus the long-standing question
whether or not the globular clusters can be taken as
`representative' of some major stellar population in the bulge or halo seems
to me to be moot -- essentially unaswerable.  At present,
they represent only themselves.
To be sure, some fraction of the field-star component must consist of stars
tidally stripped from existing clusters, or from small clusters that were entirely
dissolved; but current observations, simulations, and theoretical constraints
suggest that this fraction is not likely to exceed $\sim10$\% (e.g.,
Harris \& Pudritz 1994; Capriotti \& Hawley 1996; Murali \& Weinberg 1997).

\section{Giant E Galaxies:  Stormy Beginnings}

Observations for globular cluster systems in other galaxies
have been advancing by leaps and bounds in the
last few years.  Accurate metallicity distributions for huge samples of
clusters are starting to become available for key objects such as NGC 4472,
NGC 1399, M87, and the other gE's in Virgo and Fornax (e.g., Whitmore
et al.~1995; Geisler et al.~1996; Forbes et al.~1997a,b).
With these come more comprehensive luminosity functions
(GCLFs) and space distributions, and eventually (with the 8-meter class of
telescopes; cf.~Cohen \& Ryzhov 1997) spectra and
dynamical analyses.  From these studies, two common themes have emerged
so strongly that they must take precedence in any respectable scenario of
cluster formation:

\noindent (1) The near-universality of the {\it mass distribution
function} (GCLF):  in galaxies of all types and sizes, the clusters follow
$dN/dM \sim M^{-1.8 \pm 0.3}$, except for the lowest $\sim10$\% of the mass
range which is most strongly affected by dynamical erosion.  The GCLF is
to first order independent of metallicity and age.  Thus, globular
cluster formation seems to require only
a large input supply of gas clumped together into the SGMC-sized clouds
inferred (see above) for the Milky Way.
If this approach is basically correct, then
it is highly encouraging of the view that the sites of massive star cluster
formation happening now in (e.g.) NGC 1275 (Holtzman et al. 1992) or the
Antennae (Whitmore \& Schweizer 1995) do resemble what must have been
happening wholesale at much earlier epochs.

\noindent (2) The {\it metallicity distribution function}, which
repeatedly shows a bimodal form in giant ellipticals and spirals alike.
The metal-richer subpopulation is, invariably,
the more centrally concentrated.  The interpretation that these are the
signatures of two major, distinct epochs of cluster formation is now compelling.
But what drove these bursts, and why just two?  Answers are still not clear,
and the choice of mechanisms is now apparently larger than we had
thought a few years ago.  These mechanisms can be thought of roughly in two
categories:  ``external''
(environmental effects from outside the galaxy in question), or ``internal''
(processes strictly within the galaxy and largely immune to environment).

The most well known
external mechanism is {\it mergers}, invoked as an important source of
globular cluster formation by Schweizer (1987) and Ashman \& Zepf (1992) and
frequently mentioned since.  We now
have clear-cut evidence that massive star clusters can and do form
out of the shocked gas during mergers
(e.g. Whitmore \& Schweizer 1995; Schweizer et al.~1996; Holtzman
et al.~1992, 1996).  Lee et al. (1997) and
Geisler et al.~(1996) favor the interpretation that the metal-richer cluster
population in typical gE's was formed in a merger-stimulated burst.
This approach may explain E galaxies with low specific
frequencies; but the gE's and cD galaxies with very high specific frequencies
still appear to need a qualitatively different approach.
Unless the cluster formation efficiency is phenomenally high
during the merger, the colliding pre-cD `galaxies' must be so gas-rich to yield
the requisite number of globular clusters that they must essentially
be protogalactic clouds (Harris 1995).  Other, more detailed, difficulties
are discussed by Forbes et al. (1997a) and Geisler et al. (1996).
\begin{figure}
\plotfiddle{Harris.fig4.ps}{2.50in}{0}{60}{60}{-200}{-130}
\caption{Specific frequencies $S_N$ (number of globular clusters per
unit galaxy luminosity) for cD-type galaxies (brightest cluster members).
Solid dots are from Blakeslee et al. (1997), and open circles
are other cD's from Harris et al. (1997b). More luminous cD's are
preferentially in richer clusters, and have higher
specific frequencies.  The line at $S_N = 3.5$ represents the average
for normal (non-cD) ellipticals.} \label{fig-4}
\end{figure}

The cD/BCG galaxies make up a subclass of special interest.
The new data of Blakeslee et al. (1997) add considerably to what we
know of these centrally dominant systems (Figure~\ref{fig-4}).
It is now clear that
$S_N \sim N_{cl}/L_{gal}$ varies closely with the depth of the surrounding
potential well (as measured by the velocity dispersion of the surrounding
galaxies, or the X-ray gas temperature). The bigger cD's
sit in deeper potentials and have more clusters per unit light.
West et al. (1995) propose that such galaxies sit amidst an extended halo
of {\it intragalactic clusters} belonging to the potential well of the surrounding
galaxy cluster. Grillmair et al.~(1994) and
Kissler-Patig et al. (this conference) present tentative
evidence that such a population has been found around NGC 1399.
Furthermore, C\^ot\'e et al. (1997) show that the shape of the GCS metallicity
distribution in giant ellipticals can be matched if it is assumed that the
metal{\it-poor} clusters were acquired from tidally stripped smaller neighbors
(galaxy {\it harassment})
(though the high specific frequency and total cluster population present much
larger problems in this scenario).

Of the ``internal'' mechanisms, Forbes et al. (1997a) favor the
more traditional (in some sense) view that the globular clusters
in normal E galaxies formed {\it in situ} in two or more major epochs
of {\it local gaseous collapse and star formation}, regardless of
outside influences.  They suggest that the high$-S_N$ cD-type ellipticals may then
have acquired large extra cluster populations by tidal stripping from
other neighboring galaxies.
The traces of these events are left in the GCS metallicity distribution and
space distribution.
Later on, {\it dynamical erosion} -- tidal shocking, dynamical friction, stellar
evaporation -- will gradually remove clusters and reduce their masses; it
is intriguing to note that these effects may act in such a way as to preserve
the basic shape of the GCLF
that is built in at birth (McLaughlin \& Pudritz 1996; Vesperini 1997;
Elmegreen \& Efremov 1997).
Finally, Harris et al.~(1997b) have noted the potential importance of
{\it galactic winds}, particularly for the massive ellipticals in which
the first star formation burst is expected to be rapid.  That is, if indeed the
halo globular clusters form during the first Gyr, then they are likely to
have been affected strongly by the first SNII-driven galactic wind, which must
have been going on at very much the same time.  If the wind is capable of driving
out a large amount of the initial gas, then it is conceivable that the very high
specific frequencies in the cD galaxies are the visible result:  that
is, many clusters formed in the first burst,
but before the remaining gas could
continue well into its subsequent normal star formation, it was
expelled, eventually leaving behind a large galaxy with an
artificially high ratio of clusters to field stars.

For each of the individual mechanisms mentioned above, we can
point to a galaxy in which that particular process seems to be
the dominant one in the evolution.  But it appears that
no single approach is the answer to every situation,
and of the impressive list of processes capable of globally
influencing the characteristics of GCSs,  we are going to have to understand
them all.


Light and Electromagnetic Waves Teaching in Engineering Education

Abstract: Suggestion of physics laboratory exercises and discussion of the physics laboratory curricula for engineering majors where the properties of light and electromagnetic waves are studied in parallel. It is shown that one of the important educational advantages of an experimental study of the properties of microwaves as an example of electromagnetic waves simultaneously with the properties of light are, on one hand, visualization of the properties of microwaves, and on the other hand, provide evidences that light is an electromagnetic wave.

\section{Introduction}

\qquad Engineering is the application of mathematics and science to develop
useful products or technologies. In other words, engineering is turning
ideas into reality. Physics is the study of the physical world and physics
is an indispensable component in engineering curricula because technology is
based on our knowledge of physical laws. Physics remains the leader of the
modern natural sciences, the theoretical basis of modern engineering and as
no any other science, promotes the development of creative and critical
thinking in future engineers. Good training in physics also provides a solid
base for lifelong learning.

\qquad Research in education in different countries shows that students at
the college and even university levels continue to hold fundamental
misunderstandings of the world around them. Science learning remains within
the classroom context and just a small percentage of students are able to
use the knowledge gained at school for solving various problems of the
larger physical world \cite{1,2}.

\qquad In most of the courses students hear lectures without strong
connections to their everyday experiences. Students usually do not have the
opportunity to form their own ideas, they rarely get a chance to work in a
way where they are engaged in discovery and building and testing models to
explain the world around them, like the scientists do.

\qquad In the last four years I started to include some `simple' conceptual
questions in the exams of the physics courses I taught. The results were at
first quite surprising: Most students performed very poorly on the
conceptual questions which most physics would consider as to be almost `too
easy', while they sometimes solved `difficult' multiple-step quantitative
problems better. Some of the `top' students with high scores on the
quantitative problems had very low scores on the conceptual part \cite{3}.
One of the questions which I asked is \textquotedblleft What are the
similarities and differences between electromagnetic waves and light? The
best short answer I had was \textquotedblleft Light is an electromagnetic
wave\textquotedblright\ without any deeper explanation of the properties and
phenomena. I had a lot of speculations about light but only a few students
mentioned that light is the part of the electromagnetic spectrum the human
eye can detect and they listed the main properties of electromagnetic waves.
This motivated me to revise physics laboratory curricula and develop physics
laboratory exercises where the properties of light and electromagnetic waves
are studied in parallel. Indeed, one of the places where active and
collaborative learning can be realized is the physics laboratory, where
students become active participants of the learning process \cite{4,5,6,7}.

When Maxwell showed that electric and magnetic fields can propagate through
space according to the classical wave equation and found the equation for
the speed of propagation of electromagnetic field to be

\begin{equation}
c=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\varepsilon _{0}\mu _{0}}},
\end{equation}

where $\varepsilon _{0}$ and $\mu _{0}$\ are electric permittivity and
magnetic permeability of free space, he evaluated the numerical value for
the speed of these electromagnetic waves by substituting the numerical
values for $\varepsilon _{0}$ and $\mu _{0}$\ and obtained the remarkable
result: m/s \cite{8}. Maxwell recognized that this result is very close to
the experimentally measured speed of light and made a great conceptual
conclusion that light is electromagnetic waves. Of course, this conclusion
does not surprise physicists today. Equation (1) is one of the great
equations in physics stemming as it does from Maxwell's electromagnetic
theory. This equation unifies three seemingly disparate fields of physics:
electricity, magnetism and optics.

\qquad Since electromagnetic wave concepts are usually unfamiliar, abstract,
and difficult to visualize, conceptual analogies from familiar light
phenomena are invaluable for teaching. Such analogies emphasize the
understanding of continuity of electromagnetic waves and support the spiral
development of student understanding. We found that the approach of teaching
the topics of electromagnetic waves and optics in parallel in the physics
laboratory is very helpful and useful.

\qquad The following experiments can be easily designed and they provide a
methodical introduction to electromagnetic theory using microwave radiation
and light: the study of the inverse square law of the dependence of the
intensity of radiation (microwave and light) on the distance, the law of
reflection and refraction, investigation of the phenomenon of polarization
and how a polarizer can be used to alter the polarization of microwave
radiation and light, studying interference by performing the double-slit
experiment for microwave radiation and light. Finally students measure the
wavelength of laser light and microwave radiation using the corresponding
versions of the Michelson's interferometer, and recognize that these two
forms of radiations differ only by the wavelength or frequency.

\qquad To perform the above mentioned experiments we are using a regular
light source or He-Ne laser for optics, and microwaves transmitter and
receiver for microwave electromagnetic radiation experiments. Today for
experiments with microwaves PASCO \cite{9}, as well as DAEDALON \cite{10}
provide excellent sets. In our laboratory we are using PASCO equipment. We
are using the same design for light and microwave experiments to demonstrate
the similarity of measurements and the only difference is that in the case
of light experiments students can see the phenomena and measure its physical
properties and in the case of the microwaves they can observe the same
phenomena through the meters reading of the intensity of the microwave
radiation.

\qquad The purpose of the present paper is to introduce laboratory curricula
for the study of the properties of light and microwaves in parallel in the
general physics laboratory course for engineering majors, especially for
electrical engineering and telecommunication students. The article is
organized as follows: Sec. II introduces the experiments for the inverse
square law of the dependence of the intensity of light and microwave
radiation on the distance from a source of electromagnetic waves, in Sec.
III we analyze and discuss the reflection and refraction experiments for
microwaves and light, the double-slit interference and polarization
experiments for light and microwaves are discussed in Sec. IV and Sec. V,
respectively. Interferometer measurements for wavelength of light and
microwaves are presented in Sec. VI, and conclusions follow in Sec. VII.

\section{Inverse Square Law for Light and Microwave Radiation}

\qquad The intensity received from the pointlike source of an
electromagnetic wave is inversely proportional to the square of the distance
from the wave source and an inverse square law can be written in the form

\begin{equation}
I=\frac{L}{4\pi r^{2}},
\end{equation}

where $L$ is the luminosity of the source. To observe this phenomenon we
designed the experiment where the photoelectric photometer has been used to
measure the intensity of light in increments of distances from the light
source.
\begin{figure}[tbp]
\centering
\includegraphics[width = 85mm]{fig1a.eps}
\label{fig1a}
\vspace{-35mm}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[tbp]
\centering
\includegraphics[width = 85mm]{fig1b.eps}
\vspace{-25mm}
\caption{Inverse square law for light (a) and microwaves (b).}
\label{fig1b}
\end{figure}
In the case when the students perform the measurements for the
intensity of electromagnetic waves by using the microwave transmitter and
receiver they gradually increase the distance between the transmitter and
receiver by moving the receiver. Students represent the results of the
measurements for the dependence of intensity on the distance for light as
well as for microwaves in graphical form by plotting the relative intensity
versus the inverse square of the distance as shown in Figs. 1a and 1b. The
analysis of these graphs shows that intensities of visible light as well as
invisible microwaves decrease inversely proportional to the square of the
distance from the source.

\section{Reflection and Refraction of Light and Microwaves.}

\qquad There are two fundamental laws of geometric optics: the law of
reflection and Snell's law -- the law of refraction. Today's laboratory
class technology allows students to verify these laws using a beam of light
as well as a beam of monochromatic laser light. Students can perform
experiments for the reflection and refraction of light gradually changing
the angle of incidence and measuring the angle of reflection or the angle of
refraction and at the same time visually observing the propagation of the
incident ray and reflected or refracted rays for each of the incident
angles. By plotting the graph of dependence of the angle of reflection
versus the angle of incidence they can find that the slope of this graph is
unity and therefore, conclude that the angle of incidence equals the angle
of reflection. In the same way by plotting the graph of the sine of the
angle of incidence versus the sine of the angle of refraction students see
that there is a linear dependence and from the slope of the graph determine
the index of refraction for the given medium. Fig. 2a represents an example
of such dependence for refraction of light in glass. We are suggesting
studying reflection and refraction of microwaves in parallel with these
optics experiments. The difference of the setting for these experiments is
that in the case of light students actually see the reflected and the
refracted rays, but in the case of microwaves the reflected and refracted
electromagnetic waves are invisible and students determine the angle of
refraction as well as the angle of refraction of microwaves by finding the
maximum intensity for the reflected or refracted microwave radiation. Using
a transmitter and receiver of microwaves and a metallic reflected plate and
gradually increasing the angle of incidence, students can find the angle of
refraction which corresponds to the maximum intensity of reflecting
microwaves. In the case of refraction the incident microwaves are refracted
on the prism mold filled with styrene pellets. The angle of the refracted
microwaves can be found by the maximum intensity meter reading of the
refracted waves. Plotting the same graphs as in the case of light
experiments for the angle of incidence versus the angle of reflection and
for the sine of the angle of incidence versus sine of the angle of
refraction, students can verify the laws of reflection and refraction for
the microwaves and justify that these are the same as for light.
\begin{figure}[tbp]
\centering
\includegraphics[width = 85mm]{fig2a.eps}
\label{fig2a}
\vspace{-35mm}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[tbp]
\centering
\includegraphics[width = 85mm]{fig2b.eps}
\vspace{-25mm}
\caption{(a) Refraction of light in glass. Dependence of the sine of the angle of refraction on the sine of
the angle of incidence. (b) Reflection of microwaves. Dependence of the angle of reflection on the
angle of incidence.}
\label{fig2b}
\end{figure}
Fig. 2b presents the results for these kinds of measurements for reflection of the
microwaves.

\section{Double-Slit Interference for Light and Microwaves}

\qquad The other experiment in optics which is easy to visualize is
double-slit interference for light. This is the standard set which is
available on the market. Performing this experiment students can see a clear
interference pattern. Of course, there are many different experiments, which
also demonstrate the interference of light and visualize the interference
concept for light. We are choosing the double-slit interference of light
because a somewhat similar phenomenon occurs when microwaves pass through a
two-slit aperture and can be easily set and performed with microwaves. When
incident microwaves from a transmitter radiate on a double-slit aperture,
the intensity of the microwave beyond the aperture will vary depending on
the angle of detection by a receiver. For two thin slits separated by a
distance d, maxima of the intensity will be found at such angles that
\begin{equation}
d\sin \theta =m\lambda ,
\end{equation}%
where $\theta $\ is the angle of detection, $\lambda $\ is the wavelength of
the incident radiation, and m is any integer. Gradually changing the angle
by 5$^{0}$ for the detection position of the receiver the student measures
the intensity of microwaves beyond the double-slit aperture. Fig. 3 presents
an example of such measurements for two different runs. The solid curve
represents the measurements when the receiver is positioned close to the
double-slit aperture, while the dotted curve corresponds to the measurements
when the distance between the receiver and double-slit is increased. To
analyze the results of the experiment students for the given wavelength of
microwave calculate the angles at which they would expect the maxima and
minima to occur and compare with the locations of observed maxima and minima.
\begin{figure}[tbp]
\centering
\includegraphics[width = 85mm]{fig3.eps}
\vspace{-25mm}
\caption{Interference pattern for microwaves.}
\label{fig3}
\end{figure}

\section{\protect\bigskip Polarization Phenomena for Light and Microwaves}

The other laboratory activities which excite students and catch their
attention deal with observation of polarization of light. Two activities
which are the easiest to set in the undergraduate college physics laboratory
are polarization by absorption and polarization by reflection. As it is well
known when unpolarized light is incident on a polarizing material, the
transmitted light is linearly polarized in the direction parallel to the
transmission axis of the polarizer. When two polarizing materials are placed
in succession in a beam of light, the first is called the polarizer and the
second - the analyzer, the amount of the light transmitted by the analyzer
depends on the angle $\theta $ between its transmission axis and the
direction of the axis of the polarizer. The intensity of light transmitted
by both polarizer and analyzer will be given by Malus's law

\begin{equation}
I=I_{0}\cos ^{2}\theta ,
\end{equation}

where $I_{0}$ is the intensity of the light incident on the analyzer. The
standard setting for this experiment requires the light source (regular
light source for qualitative observation or laser for a quantitative
observation), polarizer and analyzer to be placed in succession in a beam of
light and screen or photometer for measurement of the intensity of
transmitted light. Students set up a polarizer-analyzer system and the laser
light source as shown in Fig. 4 and orient and align their polarization
axes. Slowly rotate the analyzer in either direction while observing the
intensities of the light spot on the screen. Their observation shows that
intensity of light changes. Afterwards, students attach the analyzer to the
special component carrier of the angular translator connected to the
photometer with the fiber probe and place it instead of the screen. A
student starts at $\theta =0^{0}$ and rotates the analyzer by increasing the
angle in 10$^{0}$ increments up to 180$^{0}$ and measures the intensity of
transmitted light for the different angles of polarization. The typical
results of the measurements are presented in graphical form as shown in
Fig.5a. Then students study the polarization phenomenon for microwave
radiation. The microwave radiation from the transmitter is already linearly
polarized along the transmitter diode axis. Therefore, as the microwave
propagate through space, its electric field remains aligned with the axis of
the diode. Thus, if the transmitter diode was aligned vertically, the
electric field of the transmitted wave would be vertically polarized. If the
detector diode of the receiver is at an angle $\theta $ to the transmitter
diode, the receiver would only detect the component of the incident electric
field that was aligned along its axis. Students rotate the initially aligned
receiver from 0$^{0}$ to 180$^{0}$ in increments of ten degrees and measure
the intensities of the microwave. Plotting the graph for the relative
intensities versus the angle students can observe the similarity with the
polarization of light. By comparing the data in Figs 5a and 5b and plotting
the graph of the relative intensity versus as shown in Fig. 6 student can
conclude that the intensity of polarized light as well as polarized
microwaves follows Malus's law.
\begin{figure}[tbp]
\centering
\includegraphics[width = 85mm]{fig4a.eps}
\label{fig4a}
\vspace{-35mm}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[tbp]
\centering
\includegraphics[width = 85mm]{fig4b.eps}
\vspace{-25mm}
\caption{Dependence of the relative intensity of the polarized light (a) and microwaves (b) on the polarization angle.}
\label{fig4b}
\end{figure}

To better understand the mechanism of polarization for the experiment with
microwaves, student places a grid of parallel conducting strips under
different angles between the transmitter and aligned receiver and again
measures the intensities for the different angular positions of the grid.
Linearly polarized microwaves are sent through a grid of parallel conducting
strips. We choose the two perpendicular directions used to represent the
linearly polarized incident beam to be parallel and perpendicular to the
metallic strips. The polarized waves with electric field vector parallel to
the conducting strips are absorbed by the strips. The oscillatory field
parallel to the strips transfers energy to the electrons that can move along
the strips; it is the polarization direction perpendicular to the strips
that is transmitted. So the metallic strip grid acts as a polarizer, a
device for producing polarized microwaves. The axis of a polarizer is the
direction parallel and antiparallel to the plane of polarization of the
transmitted waves. The axis of a polarizer is not a unique line but simply a
direction or a whole collection of lines oriented parallel to each other.
Therefore, for the metallic strip grid polarizer of microwaves, the axis of
the polarizer is a direction in the plane of the polarizer perpendicular to
the direction of the strips. Thus, the experiments of polarization of light
and microwaves are complementary which helps to understand and visualize the
phenomenon and mechanism of polarization.
\begin{figure}[tbp]
\centering
\includegraphics[width = 85mm]{fig5.eps}
\vspace{-25mm}
\caption{Relative intensity for polarized light and microwaves versus $\cos^{2}\theta$. Triangles represent experimental data for light and circles --- for microwaves.}
\label{fig5}
\end{figure}

Hence, on one hand students visualize the phenomenon of polarization by
observing the polarization of light. They can observe that by changing the
angle between the polarizer and analyzer the brightness of the spot of light
changes from maximum bright to dark when the angle is changing from 0$^{0}$
to 90$^{0}$. On the other hand, polarization of microwaves helps to
visualize the mechanism of polarization by observing that intensity changes
depending on the angular position of the grid.

\section{Interferometer Measurements for Wavelength of Light and Microwaves}

\qquad In the interferometry technique we superpose (interfere) two or more
electromagnetic waves, which creates an output wave different from the input
waves. Because interference is a very general phenomenon with waves,
interferometry can be applied to a wide variety of electromagnetic waves,
including optical spectrum and microwave, and can be used for measurements
of wavelength of light as well as microwaves. The Michelson interferometer
is the most common configuration for optical interferometry and can be very
easily adapted for microwave interferometry. In many scientific and
industrial uses of interferometers, a light source of a known wavelength is
used to measure incredibly small displacements - about 10 -6 meters.
However, if you know the distance of mirror movement, you can use the
interferometer to measure the wavelength of a light source as well as a
source of other electromagnetic waves. The aim of this experiment is to make
the students familiar with the simplest type of interferometers and use the
interferometer to measure the wavelength of a helium-neon laser light source
and a microwave source. The first part of the experiment is centered at
giving the students a "feeling" for the sensitivity of a Michelson
interferometer and the different types of interference patterns which can be
observed visually with the laser source. The Michelson interferometer
produces interference fringes by splitting a beam of monochromatic laser
light by a partially transparent reflector so that one beam strikes a fixed
mirror and the other a movable mirror. When the reflected beams are brought
back together, an interference pattern results. By measuring the distance $%
d_{m}$, that the movable mirror moved toward the beam-splitter and the
corresponding number of fringes $m$, students are able to determine with
high precision the wavelength of the laser light as

\begin{equation}
\lambda =\frac{2d_{m}}{m}
\end{equation}

The advantage of this part of the experiment is that the students visually
see the interference pattern. This presents a way of direct understanding of
important concepts in wave optics. In the second part of this experiment
students use the Michelson interferometer that is setup with a microwave
transmitter, partial reflector, two metallic reflectors and receiver.
Microwaves travel from the transmitter to the receiver over two different
paths. In one path, the microwave passes directly through the partial
reflector, reflects back to the first reflector, and then is reflected from
the partial reflector into the receiver. In the other path, the microwave
reflects from the partial reflector into the second reflector, and then back
through the partial reflector into the receiver. If in the optical part of
this experiment student can visually observe these pathways, for microwaves
the paths are invisible. Now by moving one of the reflectors the student
changes the path length of one wave, thereby changing its phase at the
receiver. While watching the meter, and slowly moving the reflector,
students can observe relative maxima and minima of the meter deflections. By
measuring the reflector's displacement distances and corresponding numbers
of maximum relative intensity the wavelength of microwave radiation can be
determined using the same Eq. (3) as for visible laser light.

\qquad The other advantage of this experiment is that students learn and
understand why Michelson's interferometer has become a widely used
instrument for measuring extremely small distances by using the wavelength
of a known light source. Based on this experiment students understand that
resolution for measurement of distances depends on the wavelength of
electromagnetic radiation and why an optical interferometer (an
interferometer using visible light rather than microwaves) provides better
resolution when measuring distance than a microwave interferometer.

\qquad The detailed procedures of some experiments discussed in this article
are presented in Refs.[11] and [12]. Some of the experiments are
computer-based and some are performed in the traditional way. Because not
every lab has computer access, computer-assisted experiments serve as
supplements to the traditional experiments. This allows instructors to find
the appropriate balance between traditional and computer-based experiments
for teaching topics of light and electromagnetic waves in the physics
laboratory.

\section{Conclusion}

Our ultimate goal is to improve engineering major students' learning and
motivation in physics courses by presenting the abstract material in the
traditional curriculum through real-time experiments in a laboratory
session. This approach assumes the experimental study of the properties of
light and microwaves in parallel. One of the important educational
advantages of the simultaneous study of electromagnetic waves and light is
to show that light and electromagnetic radiation have the same properties so
that the students can visualize the properties of the electromagnetic
radiation through observation of light propagation. In other words, the
abstract invisible properties of microwaves are visualized via observing
visible properties of light. On the other hand, the observation of the
polarization of microwaves helps to visualize and understand the mechanism
of the polarization of light. It is important to underline that all this is
real-time visualization but not computer-based animations, simulations or
interactive multimedia design cases. In our approach we suggested studying
the properties of electromagnetic microwave radiation and light in parallel
by performing the same laboratory experiments for light and microwaves to
show that these two phenomena demonstrate the same properties and follow the
same laws. By performing these experiments students become active
participants of the learning process.

\qquad The other advantage in teaching light and microwaves in parallel is
that students realize that for measuring the same properties of
electromagnetic waves of different range of the electromagnetic spectrum you
should use different equipment and different precision of measurements. In
our approach by analyzing data for the same phenomenon through two different
methods of measurements, students gain a greater understanding of the
concepts behind the experiments.

\qquad The visualization of complex phenomena does not by itself reach our
goal. We put this visualization into a context of the same invisible
phenomena and created a series of parallel activities that involve questions
to motivate the students and investigations of practical devices.

\acknowledgments
This work is supported by US Department of Education under the Grant P120A060052.

Physics Education (physics.ed-ph); Optics (physics.optics)