XMM-Newton and Chandra Cross Calibration Using HIFLUGCS Galaxy Clusters:
  Systematic Temperature Differences and Cosmological Impact
  Cosmological constraints from clusters rely on accurate gravitational mass
estimates, which strongly depend on cluster gas temperature measurements.
Therefore, systematic calibration differences may result in biased,
instrument-dependent cosmological constraints. This is of special interest in
the light of the tension between the Planck results of the primary temperature
anisotropies of the CMB and Sunyaev-Zel'dovich plus X-ray cluster counts
analyses. We quantify in detail the systematics and uncertainties of the
cross-calibration of the effective area between five X-ray instruments,
EPIC-MOS1/MOS2/PN onboard XMM-Newton and ACIS-I/S onboard Chandra, and the
influence on temperature measurements. Furthermore, we assess the impact of the
cross calibration uncertainties on cosmology. Using the HIFLUGCS sample,
consisting of the 64 X-ray brightest galaxy clusters, we constrain the ICM
temperatures through spectral fitting in the same, mostly isothermal, regions
and compare them. Our work is an extension to a previous one using X-ray
clusters by the IACHEC. Performing spectral fitting in the full energy band we
find that best-fit temperatures determined with XMM-Newton/EPIC are
significantly lower than Chandra/ACIS temperatures. We demonstrate that effects
like multitemperature structure and different relative sensitivities of the
instruments at certain energy bands cannot explain the observed differences. We
conclude that using XMM-Newton/EPIC, instead of Chandra/ACIS to derive full
energy band temperature profiles for cluster mass determination results in an
8% shift towards lower OmegaM values and <1% shift towards higher sigma8 values
in a cosmological analysis of a complete sample of galaxy clusters. Such a
shift is insufficient to significantly alleviate the tension between Planck CMB
anisotropies and SZ plus XMM-Newton cosmological constraints.
