The Hubble Tension in Light of the Full-Shape Analysis of Large-Scale
  Structure Data
  The disagreement between direct late-time measurements of the Hubble constant
from the SH0ES collaboration, and early-universe measurements based on the
$\Lambda$CDM model from the Planck collaboration might, at least in principle,
be explained by new physics in the early universe. Recently, the application of
the Effective Field Theory of Large-Scale Structure to the full shape of the
power spectrum of the SDSS/BOSS data has revealed a new, rather powerful, way
to measure the Hubble constant and the other cosmological parameters from
Large-Scale Structure surveys. In light of this, we analyze two models for
early universe physics, Early Dark Energy and Rock 'n' Roll, that were designed
to significantly ameliorate the Hubble tension. Upon including the information
from the full shape to the Planck, BAO, and Supernovae measurements, we find
that the degeneracies in the cosmological parameters that were introduced by
these models are well broken by the data, so that these two models do not
significantly ameliorate the tension.
