The Frontier Fields Lens Modeling Comparison Project
  Gravitational lensing by clusters of galaxies offers a powerful probe of
their structure and mass distribution. Deriving a lens magnification map for a
galaxy cluster is a classic inversion problem and many methods have been
developed over the past two decades to solve it. Several research groups have
developed techniques independently to map the predominantly dark matter
distribution in cluster lenses. While these methods have all provided
remarkably high precision mass maps, particularly with exquisite imaging data
from the Hubble Space Telescope (HST), the reconstructions themselves have
never been directly compared. In this paper, we report the results of comparing
various independent lens modeling techniques employed by individual research
groups in the community. Here we present for the first time a detailed and
robust comparison of methodologies for fidelity, accuracy and precision. For
this collaborative exercise, the lens modeling community was provided simulated
cluster images -- of two clusters Ares and Hera -- that mimic the depth and
resolution of the ongoing HST Frontier Fields. The results of the submitted
reconstructions with the un-blinded true mass profile of these two clusters are
presented here. Parametric, free-form and hybrid techniques have been deployed
by the participating groups and we detail the strengths and trade-offs in
accuracy and systematics that arise for each methodology. We note in conclusion
that lensing reconstruction methods produce reliable mass distributions that
enable the use of clusters as extremely valuable astrophysical laboratories and
cosmological probes.
