Comment on "Dark matter searches going bananas: the contribution of
  Potassium (and Chlorine) to the 3.5 keV line"
  The recent paper by Jeltema & Profumo(2014) claims that contributions from
\ion{K}{18} and \ion{Cl}{17} lines can explain the unidentified emission line
found by Bulbul et al 2014 and also by Boyarsky et al, 2014a, 2014b. We show
that their analysis relies upon incorrect atomic data and inconsistent
spectroscopic modeling. We address these points and summarize in the appendix
the correct values for the relevant atomic data from AtomDB.
