he skull). But this pseudo science has failed because its supporters were moving in the opposite direction. They decided who was involved in "criminal cases" or "sexual deviations", and then determine what features are common to such people.
It Turned out that people just don't cope well with such tasks, we see people too much of myself and make instinctive conclusions. But this does not mean that the visible features and the physiology or psychology are not related. No one doubts that the machine can mark in people the traits that they do not see, from the tiny chemical traces of explosive shells and drugs to the subtle patterns on the MRI scans, which tell of a beginning cancer.
From the article it follows that the computer vision system chooses the same subtle patterns, both artificial and natural, but in the first place; the scientists tried to focus on traits that cannot be changed easily. This supports the hypothesis that sexuality is biologically determined, perhaps under the influence of various factors on the development of the fetus, which can result in small physiological differences and hormonal patterns of the appeal. The observed system patterns are similar to those predicted by the theory of prenatal hormones.
This is the starting point of a broader social and philosophical debates about love, sexuality, determinism and intelligence emotions and personalities to simple biological characteristics. But we won't. Better touch on other serious issues regarding confidentiality.the
The effects of the automatic determination of the orientation of the man on several photos of the huge, first of all and most importantly, because put people of the LGBTQ groups at risk throughout the world in those places, where they remain oppressed minority. The potential abuse of such a system is huge and some may rightfully disagree with the decision of the researchers about its creation and documentation.
But similarly you could argue that it is better to be able to open it, to implement countermeasures or otherwise to allow people to prepare for it. The difference is that you can hide the information you post online; you can't control who sees your face. It is regulated by the society in which we live, and concealed from common view is less and less.
"Even the best laws and technology to protect privacy, in our opinion, doomed to failure," the scientists write. "The digital environment is very difficult for the police; the data can be easily transferred across the border, to steal or to record without consent".
This issue is infinitely complex, but it demonstrates the amazing capabilities of artificial intelligence. The consequences of such technologies, as usual, ambiguous, but very interesting for the future of humanity and the individual. Scientists themselves are not particularly optimistic about the use of such technologies in the future, but are realistic in an era when technology, which it is expected the plan of salvation, most likely will play the villain.
"We believe that further erosion of private life is inevitable, and the safety of gays and other menshinstv does not depend on the right to privacy and respect for human rights and tolerance of society and the state", they write. "...
Diet on genotype can be a way out for many, but it still has a lot of questions Don't know what to do to lose weight? DNA tests promise to help you with this. They will be able to develop the most individual diet, because for this they will use the m...
If aliens exist, why don't we "hear" them? In the 12th episode of Cosmos, which aired on December 14, 1980, co-author and host Carl Sagan introduced viewers to the same equation of astronomer Frank Drake. Using it, he calculated the potential number ...
The pain caused to humans by the Gimpi-gympie plant can drive him crazy Many people consider Australia a very dangerous place full of poisonous creatures. And this is a perfectly correct idea, because this continent literally wants to kill everyone w...
One of the first rules taught to all children due to the fact how important it is to w