, 50, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fasoula, D.A.; Fasoula, V.A. Competitive ability and plant breeding. Plant Breed. Rev. 1997, 14, 89–138. [Google Scholar]
- Janick, J. Exploitation of heterosis: Uniformity and stability. In The Genetics and Exploitation of Heterosis in Crops; ASA-CSSA-SSA: Madison, WI, USA, 1999; pp. 319–333. [Google Scholar]
- Tollenaar, M.; Wu, J. Yield improvement in temperate maize is attributable to greater stress tolerance. Crop Sci. 1999, 39, 1597–1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fasoula, V.A.; Fasoula, D.A. Honeycomb breeding: Principles and applications. Plant Breed. Rev. 2000, 18, 177–250. [Google Scholar]
- Fasoula, V.A.; Fasoula, D.A. Principles underlying genetic improvement for high and stable crop yield potential. Field Crop. Res. 2002, 75, 191–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tokatlidis, I.S.; Koutsika-Sotiriou, M.; Fasoulas, A.C. The development of density-independent hybrids in maize. Maydica 2001, 46, 21–25. [Google Scholar]
- Yan, W.; Wallace, D.H. Breeding for negatively associated traits. Plant Breed. Rev. 1995, 13, 141–177. [Google Scholar]
- Mauromoustakos, A.; Fasoula, V.A.; Thompson, K. Honeycomb Designs Computing and Analysis. In Proceedings of International Biometric Society: Eastern North American Region, Tampa, FL, USA, 26-29 March 2006.
- Fasoula, V.A. A novel equation paves the way for an everlasting revolution with cultivars characterized by high and stable crop yield and quality. In Proceedings of the 11th National Hellenic Conference in Genetics and Plant Breeding, Orestiada, Greece, 31 October-2 November 2006.
- Fasoula, V.A. Two Novel Whole-Plant Field Phenotyping Equations Maximize Selection Efficiency. In Modern Variety Breeding for Present and Future Needs, Proceedings of the 18th Eucarpia General Congress, Valencia, Spain, 9–12 September 2008; Prohens, J., Badenes, M., Eds.; Editorial Universidad Politecnica de Valencia: Valencia, Spain, 2008; pp. 361–365. [Google Scholar]
- Fasoula, V.A. Selection of High Yielding Plants Belonging to Entries of High Homeostasis Maximizes Efficiency in Maize Breeding. In Proceedings of the XXI International Eucarpia Conference in Maize and Sorghum Breeding in the Genomics Era, Bergamo, Italy, 21-24 June 2009.
- McClintock, B. The significance of the responses of the genome to challenge. Science 1984, 226, 792–801. [Google Scholar]
- Rasmusson, D.C.; Phillips, R.L. Plant breeding progress and genetic diversity from de novo variation and elevated epistasis. Crop Sci. 1997, 37, 303–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stokes, T.L.; Kunkel, B.N.; Richards, E.J. Epigenetic variation in Arabidopsis disease resistance. Genes Dev. 2002, 16, 171–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lolle, S.; Victor, J.L.; Young, J.M.; Pruitt, R.E. Genome-wide non-mendelian inheritance of extra-genomic information in Arabidopsis. Nature 2005, 434, 505–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grant-Downton, R.T.; Dickinson, H.G. Epigenetics and its implications for plant biology 2. The “Epigenetic Epiphany”: Epigenetics, evolution and beyond. Ann. Bot. 2006, 97, 11–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Richards, E.J. Inherited epigenetic variation-revisiting soft inheritance. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2006, 7, 395–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boyko, A.; Kovalchuk, I. Epigenetic control of plant stress response. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 2007, 49, 61–72. [Google Scholar]
- King, G.J.; Amoah, S.; Kurup, S. Exploring and exploiting epigenetic variation in crops. Genome 2010, 53, 856–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, M.; Kimatu, J.N.; Xu, K.; Liu, B. DNA cytosine methylation in plant development. J. Genet. Genomics 2010, 37, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hauser, M.T.; Aufsatz, W.; Jonak, C.; Luschnig, C. Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance in plants. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1809, 459–468. [Google Scholar]
- Dworkin, I. Canalization, cryptic variation, and developmental buffering: A critical examination and analytical perspective, 2005. Available online: https://www.msu.edu/idworkin/publications/Dworkin%20Book%20chapter%208in%20VARIATIOn.pdf (access