ision.
 See in detail in: Faluhelyi, Ferenc: Politikai vagy jogi kérdés-e ma a kisebbségek védelme [Is the Protection of Minorities a Political or a Legal Issue Today?]. Pécs, 1926
 The "procédure écrite" and "procédure non écrite" expressions had already been used by the minority department of the Secretariat. The former indicated Assembly and Council resolutions, the latter the method of implementation of the resolutions, that is, the rules of working practice.
 According to Article 5 Point 1 of the Covenant: "Except where otherwise expressly provided in this Covenant or by the terms of the present Treaty, decisions at any meeting of the Assembly or of the Council shall require the agreement of all the Members of the League represented at the meeting." See Hungarian text in: Halmosy. ibid. 42.
 Cf. relevant sections of the minorities and peace treaties.
 There are several examples to this, including the case of the Hungarian numerus clausus, in connection to which the Council gave time to the Hungarian government to amend the law. Another case was that of the German settlers in Poland when, besides the opinion of the Permanent Court of International Justice, the Council delegated a committee to help conclude an agreement between the settlers and government. A third case occurred when the Romanian government's proposal on the reparations to be given to the Hungarian settlers in Transylvania was accepted. See the description of similar cases in: Buza L.. ibid. 249-347.
 See Halmosy. ibid. 47.
 Ibid. 45.
 "...The Court shall be competent to hear and determine any dispute of an international character which the parties thereto submit to it. The Court may also give an advisory opinion upon any dispute or question referred to it by the Council or by the Assembly." See Hungarian text in: Halmosy. ibid. 45.
 According to Gütermann. ibid. 149. these expressions were known to and used by the minority department of the Secretariat.
 It was of great significance in the course of the procedure before the Council who the chosen rapporteur was, what pieces of information were at his disposal, and the circumstances of the drafting of his report (in Geneva on the basis of documents or based on experiences at the location).
 The scope of this study does not allow for the discussion and examination of this working method.
 Delivered at the 62nd Meeting of the Council of the League of Nations on 24 January 1931. JO, 1931., 238-239. See also Gütermann. ibid. 132.
 JO, 1933. 929-933. Quoted in: Gütermann. ibid. 134.
 The Council of the League of Nations confirmed the partially accepted resolution of the Assembly: no further negotiations took place, since there was no reason to change the procedure in lack of the wrecked Jewish question.