he building for negligence. In this case, the negligence would be not placing a sign that indicates wet floors. In most situations, we can usually assume that the wet floors would be indicated with some sort of sign so that nobody suffers from injuries.
What’s the big takeaway?
Ultimately, even the most skilled DC injury attorneys agree that negligence is always up for debate. It depends on the context of the situation, and what role the person being accused of negligence had. As a juror, it is necessary that you try your best to imagine what an ordinary person would do in the situation and in that role, and make your deliberations based on that (along with the evidence, of course).
Please do not rely on any above statements as legal advice. You should always seek the advice of a licensed lawyer in order to assist you.