e time should ever come—and I do not concede any conflict to be even remotely possible—when my office would require me to either violate my conscience or violate the national interest, then I would resign the office; and I hope any conscientious public servant would do the same. The United States Supreme Court has referenced the separation of church and state metaphor more than 25 times, though not always fully embracing the principle, saying "the metaphor itself is not a wholly accurate description of the practical aspects of the relationship that in fact exists between church and state". In Reynolds, the Court denied the free exercise claims of Mormons in the Utah territory who claimed polygamy was an aspect of their religious freedom. The Court used the phrase again by Justice Hugo Black in 1947 in Everson. In a minority opinion in Wallace v. Jaffree, Justice Rehnquist presented the view that the establishment clause was intended to protect local establishments of religion from federal interference. Rehnquist made numerous citations of cases that rebutted the idea of a total wall of separation between Church and State. A result of such reasoning was Supreme Court support for government payments to faith-based community projects. Justice see has criticized the metaphor as a bulldozer removing religion from American public life. In conclusion, The only way the Founding fathers or the Constitution ever even suggested Separation of Church and State was in intentions of keeping the State out of the Church Not the other way around. http://www.forbes.com/sites/billflax/2011/07/09/the-true-meaning-of-separation-of-church-and-state/
Thursday, September 13, 2012
A movie is not causing the violence in the Middle East the violent perpetrators are! I am not supporting that movie, I am only saying reacting in violence was a choice they made. http://www.caintv.com/StopblamingTheMovieandstopassa-411
Wednesday, August 1, 2012
With all of this controversy in the media over Dan Cathy's remarks, I can't help but ask where is the Liberal outrage against Islamic Shari'ah law? According to Islamic Shari'ah law homosexuality is not only punishable by death but it should be the most painful death they can find. Anybody that knows anything about the Oil markets knows that Islamic controlled OPEC has a lot of power there. I do not see a large scale boycott of oil, why is that? I believe it is because this is not truly about what Dan Cathy believes but is the left attacking Christianity and the rights of Christians to hold to and share their beliefs. As we all know Islam is not likely to have a great effect on American politics yet whereas Christianity can unless it has it's legs pulled out from under it. I believe people like Rahm Emanuel are trying to use this as a political maneuver to limit the influence of Christian morals on the election. Well that is just my opinion, if you don't like it sue me, just don't steal my Chick-fil-A sandwich cause I am hungry.
Sunday, July 29, 2012
I will not stand idly by while this once great nation is overrun with political correctness and liberal "tolerances"! I say STAND UP AND BE COUNTED! According to the Dept of Homeland Security I am a terrorist because I oppose abortion and Illegal immigration. According to the Liberal Mayors of several cities ie:Boston, I have no right to my Christian morals and if I stand by them and have a business they will shut me out . According to President Obama I must comply with his idea of proper healthcare . I say we MUST band together and fight for the America we love and we want back! VIVA LA REVOLUTION!!