active iodine isotopes in infants and children living around Chernobyl suggests caution in use of 131-I in younger children. Since the possibility of a general induction of cancer by 131-I is of central concern, it is interesting to calculate the risk in children using the data presented by Rivkees et al (44.2) who are proponents of use of RAI for therapy in young children..The risk of death from cancer due specifically to radiation exposure is noted by these authors to be 0.16%/rem for children, and the whole body radiation exposure from RAI treatment at age 10 to be 1.45 rem/mCi administered. Rivkees et al advise treatment with doses of RAI greater then 160 uCi/gram thyroid, to achieve a thyroidal radiation dose of at least 150Gy (about 15000 rads). Assuming a reasonable RAIU of 50% and gland size of 40 gm, the administered dose would thus be 40(gm) x 160uCi/gm x 2 (to account for 50% uptake) =12.8 mCi. Thus the long term cancer death risk would be 12.8 (mCi) x 1.45 rem (per mCi) x 0.16% (per rem) = 3%. For a dose of 15mCi the incremental risk a of cancer mortality would be 4% at age 5, 2% at age 10, and 1% at age 15 Whether or not accepting a specific 2-5% risk of death from cancer because of this treatment is of course a matter of judgment by the physician and family. However, this would seem to many persons to constitute a significant risk that should be avoided
Low 131-I uptake–
Certain other findings may dictate the choice of therapy. Occasionally, the 131-I uptake is significantly blocked by prior iodine administration. The effect of iodide dissipates in a few days after stopping exposure, but it may take 3-12 weeks for the effect of amiodarone or IV contrast dyes to be lost. One may either wait for a few days to weeks until another 131-I tracer indicates that the uptake is in the toxic range or use an alternative therapeutic approach such as antithyroid drugs.
Sometimes a patient with thyrotoxicosis harbors a thyroid gland with a configuration suggesting the presence of a malignant neoplasm. These patients probably should have surgical exploration. While FNA may exclude malignancy, the safety of leaving a highly irradiated nodule in place for many years is not established. Currently few patients who will have RAI therapy are subjected to ultrasonagraphy or scintiscaning. However Stocker et al. found that 12% of Graves’ patients had cold defects on scan, and among these half were referred for surgery. Six of 22, representing 2% of all Graves’ patients, 15% of patients with cold nodules, 25% of patients with palpable nodules, and 27% of those going to surgery had papillary cancer in the location corresponding to the cold defect. Of these patients, one had metastasis to bone and two required multiple treatments with radioiodine. They argue for evaluating patients with a thyroid scintigram and further diagnostic evaluation of cold defects(201a).
131-I therapy causes an increase in titers of TSH-RAbs, and anti-TG or TPO antibodies, which reflects an activation of autoimmunity. It probably is due to release of thyroid antigens by cell damage, or possibly destruction of intrathyroidal T cells. Many thyroidologists are convinced that 131-I therapy can lead to exacerbation of infiltrative ophthalmopathy, perhaps because of this immunologic response. Tallstedt and associates published data indicating that 131-I therapy causes exacerbation of ophthalmopathy in nearly 25% of patients, while surgery is followed by this response in about half as many.The same group conducted a second randomized trial (96) with a follow-up of 4 yr. Patients with a recent diagnosis of Graves’ hyperthyroidism were randomized to treatment with iodine-131 (163 patients) or 18 months of medical treatment (150 patients). Early substitution with T4 was given in both groups.: Worsening or development of eye problems was significantly more common in the iodine-131 treatment group (63 patients; 38.7%) compared with the medical treatment group (32 patients; 21.3%) (P < 0.001) (201b, 201c) Thus, as described below, patients with significant ophthalmopathy