s of High Homeostasis Maximizes Efficiency in Maize Breeding. In Proceedings of the XXI International Eucarpia Conference in Maize and Sorghum Breeding in the Genomics Era, Bergamo, Italy, 21-24 June 2009.
- McClintock, B. The significance of the responses of the genome to challenge. Science 1984, 226, 792–801. [Google Scholar]
- Rasmusson, D.C.; Phillips, R.L. Plant breeding progress and genetic diversity from de novo variation and elevated epistasis. Crop Sci. 1997, 37, 303–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stokes, T.L.; Kunkel, B.N.; Richards, E.J. Epigenetic variation in Arabidopsis disease resistance. Genes Dev. 2002, 16, 171–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lolle, S.; Victor, J.L.; Young, J.M.; Pruitt, R.E. Genome-wide non-mendelian inheritance of extra-genomic information in Arabidopsis. Nature 2005, 434, 505–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grant-Downton, R.T.; Dickinson, H.G. Epigenetics and its implications for plant biology 2. The “Epigenetic Epiphany”: Epigenetics, evolution and beyond. Ann. Bot. 2006, 97, 11–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Richards, E.J. Inherited epigenetic variation-revisiting soft inheritance. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2006, 7, 395–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boyko, A.; Kovalchuk, I. Epigenetic control of plant stress response. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 2007, 49, 61–72. [Google Scholar]
- King, G.J.; Amoah, S.; Kurup, S. Exploring and exploiting epigenetic variation in crops. Genome 2010, 53, 856–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, M.; Kimatu, J.N.; Xu, K.; Liu, B. DNA cytosine methylation in plant development. J. Genet. Genomics 2010, 37, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hauser, M.T.; Aufsatz, W.; Jonak, C.; Luschnig, C. Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance in plants. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1809, 459–468. [Google Scholar]
- Dworkin, I. Canalization, cryptic variation, and developmental buffering: A critical examination and analytical perspective, 2005. Available online: https://www.msu.edu/idworkin/publications/Dworkin%20Book%20chapter%208in%20VARIATIOn.pdf (accessed on 31 August 2012).
- Ronnegard, L.; Valdar, W. Detecting major genetic loci controlling phenotypic variability in experimental crosses. Genetics 2011, 188, 435–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fasoula, V.A.; Boerma, H.R. Divergent selection at ultra-low plant density for seed protein and oil content within soybean cultivars. Field Crop. Res. 2005, 91, 217–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fasoula, V.A.; Boerma, H.R. Intra-cultivar variation for seed weight and other agronomic traits within three elite soybean cultivars. Crop Sci. 2007, 47, 367–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fasoula, D.A. An overlooked source of seed degradation and its implications in the efficient exploitation of plant genetic resources. Plant Genet. Resour. 2011, 9, 321–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yates, J.L.; Boerma, H.R.; Fasoula, V.A. SSR-marker analysis of the intracultivar phenotypic variation discovered within 3 soybean cultivars. J. Hered. 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Falconer, D.S. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics; John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
- Fasoula, D.A. Accurate whole-plant phenotyping: An important component for successful marker assisted selection (MAS). In Genetic variation for Plant Breeding, Proceedings of 17th EUCARPIA General Congress, Tulln, Austria, 8–11 September 2004; Vollmann, J., Grausgruber, H., Ruckenbauer, P., Eds.; BOKU-University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences: Vienna, Austria, 2004; pp. 203–206. [Google Scholar]
- Wych, R.D.; Rasmusson, D.C. Genetic improvement in malting barley cultivars since 1920. Crop Sci. 1983, 23, 1037–1040. [Google Scholar]
- Wych, R.D.; Stuthman, D.D. Genetic improvement in Minnesota-adapted oat cultivars released since 1923. Crop Sci. 1983, 23, 879–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duvick, D.N. Genetic Contributions to Yield Gains of US Hybrid Maize, 1930-1980. In Genetic Contributions to Yield Gains of Five Major Crop Plants; Fehr, W.R., Ed.; Crop Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy: M