and Y vs 0.
Why is this important?
If only more people followed this rule more often, things would be much better for society as a whole. Person 0 doesn’t care because there’s other important matters, situations, and goals in life; and participating in an unnecessary conflict only takes the energy away that’s needed for daily activities. In short, both X and Y are trying to antagonize 0 because 0 decides to focus on other important matters. X can have two options at this point – stop or keep going. X mostly decides to keep going for personal, unknown reasons.
So what does 0 do? 0 decides it’s time to exploit certain holes in their logic by asking questions which makes them lose the verbal conflict. Example:
Person 1 – Do you want food for breakfast? (Food being a variable for something consumed like bacon, toast, etc)
X – They don’t eat food. It’s beneath them. (This is where X makes a statement instead of staying out of something that has nothing to do with them)
0 – I can answer questions directed towards me thank you. (0 exploits one hole which causes X to get upset and walk away)
X – You need to – (when someone starts a statement like this, automatic shutdown of all logic from whatever is said after)
0 – Why do I need to?
X – Because you do, that’s why! (Notice X doesn’t really give an actual, logical reason behind the choice of words and phrase, just answers with a pre-programmed defense phrase)
0 – Did you ever ask what – (notice how 0 asks a question which challenges X’s intelligence?)
X – remains silent
X – Well what you’re doing/saying says otherwise (such as? Provide examples and not what you want to see/hear)
X – Has limited employment options due to education, experience, and age. Uses this as a weapon against 0 who has more opportunity once the situation arises.
0 – Is selective in what they want to have something long-term over temp, views all available options, and uses what they learned as a way for better employment.
X – Continues to ridicule 0 because X can find employment; yet chooses not to for personal reasons.
0 – remains silent because X doesn’t ask the right questions and instead assumes based off what they want to see/hear.
Y is heavily influenced off of X, and due to certain incentives off of X, Y decides it’s time to let 0 go and seek shelter elsewhere. 0 proves with documentation, and answering the right questions correctly that effort is put into what X is debating otherwise; yet Y is stuck between a rock and a hard place while 0 and X are within the same area. So X wins the battle for Y due to incentives 0 can’t dispute. What X and Y doesn’t realize, however, is 0 knows the war will be won because there’s something X and Y hasn’t thought about –
Where’s the mistakes?
1 – X and Y are in a semi-financial situation, as well as limited space. Therefore, they’re only making their financial situation worse. 0 knows this, and they don’t know 0’s financial situation, and knows 0 can live on their own in limited space(s).
2 – X and Y combined intelligence doesn’t equal what 0 knows, and what 0 is capable of. Granted there’s certain skills X and Y do know that 0 is limited on, at the same time X and Y are limited on what employment opportunities are available, as well as having financial responsibilities for offspring; while 0 doesn’t have to worry about anyone but themselves.
3 – X and Y have a limited friend pool, and X has an even smaller pool of outside resources. 0 made some new friends in a short amount of time who offered to help because 0 proved to be a good person who keeps their word. 0 also knows how to read people (within reason) and can make legit, unbreakable bonds by proving to be different and not follow society and/or the stereotypes.
4 – 0 also has an ultimate goal, while X and Y just live day by day instead of having a goal/dream in mind. Due to some decisions influenced by X, Y has limited choice on what’s available and what can be done to fix their situation.
5 – Y has expressed multiple times X is a problem, yet can’t do much because there’s a certain tie they have that can’t be 