5-277. - the need for the establishment of a Jewish "national home" ("nationale Heimstätte"), etc. See: Pircher. ibid. 66.
 It is not necessary to touch upon the provisions of all peace treaties in this respect. I shall quote only Article 44 Paragraph 1 and Article 47 of the Trianon Treaty: "The Serb-Croat-Slovene State recognises and confirms in relation to Hungary its obligation to accept the embodiment in a Treaty with the Principal Allied and Associated Powers such provisions as may be deemed necessary by these Powers to protect the interests of inhabitants of that State who differ from the majority of the population in race, language or religion..." See Hungarian text in: Halmosy. ibid. 101-102.
 The detailed analysis of those provisions of international law that were not placed under the protection of the League of Nations, the discussion of their "pre- and post-history", and the exploration of their influence on international relations could serve with numerous lessons for any experts of international law. However, the scope of this work does not allow for this. Documents enumerated under [II] comprise only a fraction of these types of treaties. Further sections of the monograph by the author, with a special emphasis on Part III Point 5, touch upon a few treaties not included in the enumeration here.
 The Resolution of the Council of the League of Nations adopted on 24 June 1921 called upon Finland to enact a law on the autonomy of the Åland Islands in exchange of the recognition of its sovereignty with respect to the islands. Finland and Sweden drafted the agreement through direct negotiations. The agreement was signed on 27 June, which the Council acknowledged with its above-mentioned resolution. See the text of the resolution: Kraus. ibid. 116-119. On the status of the Swedish minority of the Åland Islands under international law see Kovács Péter: Nemzetközi jog és kisebbségvédelem. Budapest, 1996, 211-224.
 See the German text of the minority protection provisions of the Convention (Articles 64-158) in: Kraus. ibid. 126-163.
 See Flachbarth. ibid. 80.
 See Flachbarth. ibid. 82.
 See Flachbarth. ibid. 82.
 See Kraus. ibid. 90-95.; and Viefhaus. ibid. 212-216.
 The Memel Statute is to provide for the protection of the Polish minority of the Memel area under Lithuanian jurisdiction by stipulating for the application of the Lithuanian Minorities Declaration in the area (Article 11). Furthermore, under Article 26, it ipso facto stipulates for the application of the minority protection procedure established by the League of Nations. See Kraus. ibid. 121-122.; Pircher. ibid. 97-98.
 One particular feature is to be pointed out: The word "minority" refers not only to the Polish-speaking citizens but every Polish-born or other language speaking person. "Danzig pledges to consider the provisions applied by Poland authoritative with respect to the minorities, [...] not to apply any discrimination neither with respect to Polish citizenship nor against persons of Polish birth or mother tongue." In: Pircher. ibid. 95.
 See the original French text in: Kraus. ibid. 114. See Hungarian text in: Buza. ibid. 26. The question of minorities emerged at the 5th Committee during the first Assembly of the League of nations. This Committee was in charge of the examination of the countries to be admitted into the organisation. Members of the subcommittee that was step up for this specific task were: Lord Robert Cecil (South Africa), Motta (Switzerland), and Bene (Czechoslovakia). The recommendation mentioned above was issued by the Assembly on 15 December 1920 at the proposal of this subcommittee.
 See Kraus. ibid. 119-121.
 See Kraus. ibid. 121-126.
 See Kraus. ibid. 174-176.
 See Kraus. ibid. 188-191. The Latvian and Estonian declarations are particular because these countries were unwilling to make a declaration which, similar to the Lithuanian and Albanian declarations, would have included the relevant sections of the minorities treaties. Their admission into the League of Nations was therefore delayed until a compromise was reached.