I have an angle where I need to convert a 'normal' angle to an isometric angle (116 degrees), and I came up with this function. It works, but I was wondering if the math could be optimized/simplified, or if this is the way to go. It's for a mobile game. public static inline var ISO:Float = 0.45378560551; // (116-90) / 180 * PI=;function convert(angle:Float):Float{   angle -= Math.PI; // corrected angle   var randomChoosenDistance = 2.0; // could be anything, I'm only interested in final angle.  // calculate new line, using isometic angle.  var x1 = Math.cos(angle - ISO);  var x2 = Math.cos(angle - ISO) * randomChoosenDistance;  var y1 = Math.sin(angle);  var y2 = Math.sin(angle) * randomChoosenDistance;  var dx = x1 - x2;  var dy = y1 - y2;  angle = Math.atan2(dy, dx);  return angle;}Can I get the new angle, without calculating the angle between the temporary points I'm creating at the moment?
Calculating angle in isometric view
optimization;mathematics;computational geometry;haxe
@neo pointed out that dx can be calculated as (1 - r) * Math.cos(a - b).  Similarly, dy = (1 - r) * Math.sin(a).  However, when you take dy / dx, which is what Math.atan2(dy, dx) implicitly does with its arguments, the (1 - r) factor cancels out.  You can also see, using a geometric argument, that (x2, y2) is pointless (pardon the pun).Therefore, Math.atan2(y1, x1) would work just the same as Math.atan2(dy, dx).So far, your function can be simplified to the following.  Since you repurposed angle twice, I need to disambiguate them as alpha, beta, and theta for this discussion.public static inline var ISO:Float = 0.45378560551; // (116-90) / 180 * PI=;function convert(alpha:Float):Float{   var beta = alpha - Math.PI; // corrected angle   // calculate new line, using isometic angle.  var x1 = Math.cos(beta - ISO);  var y1 = Math.sin(beta);  var theta = Math.atan2(y1, x1);  return theta;}But wait, there's more!  There's a mysterious correction from alpha to beta, and the cosine expression is complicated.Let's start with Math.sin(beta).  That's Math.sin(-alpha), or -Math.sin(alpha).It would be nice to say Math.atan2(Math.sin(alpha), something) instead of Math.atan2(-Math.sin(alpha), something).  Let's move the negation into the denominator then, for var theta = Math.atan2(Math.sin(alpha), -x1).Can we simplify -x1?-x1 = -Math.cos(beta - ISO)    = Math.cos(beta - ISO + 180)    = Math.cos(alpha - 180 - ISO + 180)    = Math.cos(alpha - ISO)So, your function simplifies to:public static inline var ISO:Float = 0.45378560551; // = (116-90) / 180 * PIfunction convert(angle:Float):Float{     return Math.atan2(Math.sin(angle), Math.cos(angle - ISO));}Not only is the code more efficient, it's also less mysterious: the transformation is taking the x-coordinate of each point as if it were rotated 26 clockwise!I have to question the motivation behind this function, though.  This isn't an angle-preserving transformation, so why are you operating on an angle?  Normally, you transform points' coordinates using matrix multiplication.