At work, I write bash scripts frequently. My supervisor has suggested that the entire script be broken into functions, similar to the following example:#!/bin/bash# Configure variablesdeclare_variables() {    noun=geese    count=three}# Announce somethingi_am_foo() {    echo I am foo    sleep 0.5    echo hear me roar!}# Tell a jokewalk_into_bar() {    echo So these ${count} ${noun} walk into a bar...}# Emulate a pendulum clock for a bitdo_baz() {    for i in {1..6}; do        expr $i % 2 >/dev/null && echo tick || echo tock        sleep 1    done}# Establish run ordermain() {    declare_variables    i_am_foo    walk_into_bar    do_baz}mainIs there any reason to do this other than readability, which I think could be equally well established with a few more comments and some line spacing?Does it make the script run more efficiently (I would actually expect the opposite, if anything), or does it make it easier to modify the code beyond the aforementioned readability potential? Or is it really just a stylistic preference?Please note that although the script doesn't demonstrate it well, the run order of the functions in our actual scripts tends to be very linear -- walk_into_bar depends on stuff that i_am_foo has done, and do_baz acts on stuff set up by walk_into_bar -- so being able to arbitrarily swap the run order isn't something we would generally be doing. For example, you wouldn't suddenly want to put declare_variables after walk_into_bar, that would break things.An example of how I would write the above script would be:#!/bin/bash# Configure variablesnoun=geesecount=three# Announce somethingecho I am foosleep 0.5echo hear me roar!# Tell a jokeecho So these ${count} ${noun} walk into a bar...# Emulate a pendulum clock for a bitfor i in {1..6}; do    expr $i % 2 >/dev/null && echo tick || echo tock    sleep 1done
Why write an entire bash script in functions?
bash;shell script;function
I've started using this same style of bash programming after reading Kfir Lavi's blog post Defensive Bash Programming. He gives quite a few good reasons, but personally I find these the most important:procedures become descriptive: it's much easier to figure out what a particular part of code is supposed to do.  Instead of wall of code, you see Oh, the find_log_errors function reads that log file for errors . Compare it with finding whole lot of awk/grep/sed lines that use god knows what type of regex in the middle of a lengthy script - you've no idea what's it doing there unless there's comments.you can debug functions by enclosing into set -x and set +x. Once you know the rest of the code works alright , you can use this trick to focus on debugging only that specific function. Sure, you can enclose parts of script, but what if it's a lengthy portion ? It's easier to do something like this: set -x parse_process_list set +xprinting usage with cat <<- EOF . . . EOF. I've used it quite a few times to make my code much more professional. In addition, parse_args() with getopts function is quite convenient. Again, this helps with readability, instead of shoving everything into script as giant wall of text. It's also convenient to reuse these.And obviously, this is much more readable for someone who knows C or Java, or Vala, but has limited bash experience. As far as efficiency goes, there's not a lot of what you can do - bash itself isn't the most efficient language and people prefer perl and python when it comes to speed and efficiency. However, you can nice a function:nice -10 resource_hungry_functionCompared to calling nice on each and every line of code, this decreases whole lot of typing AND can be conveniently used when you want only a part of your script to run with lower priority.Running functions in background, in my opinion, also helps when you want to have whole bunch of statements to run in background.Some of the examples where I've used this style:https://askubuntu.com/a/758339/295286https://askubuntu.com/a/788654/295286https://github.com/SergKolo/sergrep/blob/master/chgreeterbg.sh