Basically I am looking for what is it that you goof up and you are out from the remaining process ?Are elimination rounds a fair way to judge a person ? Anyone can have a bad hour :-( Should you code the best possible or should you get the Algorithm right ? I generally first code a workable solution and then work on it till a level I think it looks beautiful to me. Is this a wrong approach ?Recently I had a telephonic interview in which I was asked to write a variation of Level Order traversal in 20 minutes. I could get the Algorithm and working code in 20 minutes but couldn't get the Exception handling and the coding convention right, after which I didn't hear back from them :-( All the other questions in the interview went very well this was the only thing which was 'not upto the mark'.Needless to say I like the company and will apply again but want to get it right the next time :-)Please share your experiences and valuable suggestions.
What top companies look for in an Interview?
interview;experience;top companies
When doing technical interviews, I'm honestly looking for people to hit a home run. If the candidate doesn't look like they know their stuff, they're not going to be effective in their role (I'm talking senior developers positions here).Look at it this way: Would you rather have a tough interview where you don't get the job (because you're not a good fit), or an easy interview where you do get the job, but then get let go after 90 days because you're in over your head?I've seen far too many developers in the latter camp. If you didn't get the job because you flubbed the technical part, consider it a blessing in disguise. If you don't like rejection, bone up on your technical skills.