Running a (C)LFS-x86_64 Linux computer with 32 bit libraries installed in parallel in /{usr,}/lib32 (compared with /{usr,}/lib64 which contains the same libraries, plus a couple extra.)Finished installing a pair of Qt-5.4.0 libraries to /opt/qt5 (symbolic link to /opt/qt-5.4.0/) with a pair of library directories and plugins installed within the arch-specific library dirs.Now curious as to if it's worth installing 32-bit KDE. In addition to KDE being a pain to find all the bits of anyway, installing a pair of each KDE library (and plausibly executables in some cases) will take more than twice as long.Edit - Highlighting question belowHow many things depend on KDE libs? (Outside of KDE packages)Am I likely to be caught out if I only install a 64-bit KDE? (w.r.t. closed source programs, eg VirtualBox (shouldn't require KDE libs?), spotify (runs fine on my 'pure' 64-bit system with a couple of static libraries), etc...)
Should I bother installing 32-bit KDE libraries?
kde;64bit;32bit;multiarch