I'm used to version control, in particular I currently use Mercurial. I have some doubts about how to make it work in large teams, where there is a good probability of having more people working on the same file.Let me make an example with Mercurial (but any decentralized system will be more or less the same). Say we have a central server and three developers Alice, Bob and Carl. The three decide to start working at the same moment and they all pull from the server. By chance it happens that they are working on the same file.Alice finishes first, and push her changes to the server. Then both Bob and Carl finish, more or less at the same time. Before pushing, they check whether there is something new, and find Alice's commit. So they pull it, and each one merges the changes locally. Then Bob pushes it and Carl pushes its changes.What happens here is that on the server there are two heads: one by Bob and one by Carl, and both include merges with Alice's work. Whoever now pulls from the server will find a little mess. Of course one can just merge Bob and Carl heads, but that may not be as simple. Bob and Carl may have had different ideas on how to merge with Alice's work.As soon as more people start working on the project, things can go even worse. So, while in theory I understand how merges are supposed to work, it is not clear to me how to make things manageable in a large project.How do people manage to resolve conflicts when there are many people working on the same file, possibly having done different merges in different orders?
Version control management of large projects
version control;mercurial
The way this is done is that every developer must merge changes before they commit a file. I have never used Mercurial so I don't know the commands or the exact process, but in any serious config management tool you will be warned if you try to check in over the top of someone else. When you get this warning you should merge the other changes in to your checked out copy, check the build and tests etc and then check in.This is a very common issue, and merging in this way can be a real PITA, but that's life. The alternative approach of locking all checked out files prevents this issue, but has the serious drawback of blocking everyone else while you work on a file, which in turn leads to people editing uncontrolled versions and then all hell breaks loose...