I'm a software developer working in an embedded systems company.We have a Project Manager, who takes care of the overall project schedule (including electrical, quality, software and manufacturing) hence his software schedule is very brief.We also have a Software Manager, who's my boss.He makes me write and maintain the software schedule, design documents (high and low level design), SRS, change management, verification plans and reports, release management, reviews, and of course the software.We only have one Test Engineer for the whole software team (10 members), and at any given time, there are a couple of projects going on.I'm spending 80% of my time making these documents. My boss comes from a Process background, and believes what we need is better documentation to improve software:He considers the design to be paramount, coding is just writing the design down, it shouldn't take too long, and all the code should be written before the hardware is ready. Doesn't understand the difference between a Central & Distributed Version control, even after we told him its easier to collaborate with a distributed model.Doesn't understand code, and wants to understand every bug and its proposed solution.Believes verification should be done by developer, and validation by the Tester. Thing is though, our verification only checks if implementation is correct (we don't write unit tests, it's never considered in the schedule), and validation is black box testing, so the units tests are missing.I'm really confused. Am I responsible for maintaining all these documents? It makes me feel like I'm doing the Software Project Management, in essence. I'm ok with technical documentation, but I believe scheduling/planning should not be done by the developer.I don't really like creating documents, I want to solve problems and write code. In my experience, creating design documents only helps to an extent, its never the solution to better or faster code.I feel the boss doesn't really care about making better products, but only about being a good manager in the eyes of the management. What can I do? This whole year I've done 3 months of actual coding, the rest just spent in making documents and waiting for bug reports from clients.
Software Manager who makes developers do Project Management
design;project management;development process;documentation
You sound like a Software Engineer.A Project Manager is more focused on the status of the overall project and allocating resources in an effective way to ensure that milestones are being met and in proper time.  They also remove roadblocks and help the project resources focus on their specific job functions.Writing and maintaining design and technical documentation is an important part of being a software engineer and is appropriate for your role.  Too much of a good thing can be bad though (See Analysis Paraylsis ).He considers the design to be paramount, coding is just writing the design downIf the project manager considers the design documents to be paramount then he expects the documents as a deliverable in the process.  It is not a wasted time on your part if he feels they are important enough to allocate 80% of your time to it.it shouldn't take too long, and all the code should be written before the hardware is ready. This is wishful thinking and quite an antiquated Waterfall style view of how software development works.  It invariably is never that clean no matter how much design and preparation that you devote.  On that note however, you should have clear hardware specs and proper test environments and mock hardware simulations for your code to interact with but again, the real world is messy.Project management is incredibly easy in a perfect world.  The world is not perfect however no matter how much you wish it to be so making real project management incredibly difficult.  This is why they are paid the big bucks.(2) Doesn't understand the difference between a Central & Distributed Version control.Why should he care?  How does it affect the milestones?  It doesn't.3) Doesn't understand code, and wants to understand every bug and its proposed solutionHis goal is for working software and yours should be too.  He does not need to understand the code but he does need to understand the issues that are preventing working software.  Once the two of you see eye to eye on this basic level then your mutual goal will help you work together more effectively.(4) Believes verification should be done by developer, and validation by the Tester.What is wrong with this sentiment?  Testers in the quality assurance role should be concerned with validating features and requirements.  Developers should make every effort to verify and test their work before it goes to testing.I don't really like creating documents, I want to solve problems and write code.If you would rather be a simple programmer then perhaps you should talk to your boss about this and see if there is a better role for you on the project.  Somebody needs to write and maintain the technical documentation, so perhaps one of the other developers can help you with some of these tasks so you aren't spending 80% of your time writing documentation.In my experience, creating design documents only helps to an extent, its never the solution to better or faster code.This is mostly true... but only if all ten developers are spending 80% of their time writing technical documentation that nobody will ever read.  This is an enormous management anti-pattern that I have lived in before.  If you find that you are doing most of the documentation for the team then it hardly seems fair that you are denied the right to perform more coding work.The fact of the matter is that the best technical documentation is the code itself.I feel the boss doesn't really care about making better products, but only about being a good manager in the eyes of the managementI feel that he does care because the product is his ward and if projects and features are not completed and clients aren't happy then upper management will not care for him very much.  The problem is that your perspective on the necessary quality improvements don't match with his, and upper management, and the clients perception of what they feel is important.Try to understand what is truly important for the product, because while you can increase the efficiency of a process 3 fold, if you spend an entire week doing this then it is at the cost of another important feature that the client is demanding.We all want to look good to the eyes of our superior.  There is nothing wrong with that, it is human nature to be self serving.  This is a fact of life.