I downloaded the iso from https://getfedora.org/en/workstation/download/Next, I attempted to follow the instructions at https://getfedora.org/en/verifyI downloaded the checksum file from the following url:getfedora.org/en/static/checksums/Fedora-Workstation-22-x86_64-CHECKSUMI then validated it from the command line:$ gpg --verify-files *-CHECKSUMgpg: Signature made Fri 22 May 2015 12:47:01 PM PDT using RSA key ID 8E1431D5gpg: Good signature from Fedora (22) <fedora@fedoraproject.org>gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!gpg:          There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.Primary key fingerprint: C527 EA07 A934 9B58 9C35  E1BF 11AD C094 8E14 31D5Since the RSA key ID matched, I figured the checksum file was good.  Finally, I attempted to match the iso image's checksum with the checksum file:$ sha256sum -c *-CHECKSUMsha256sum: Fedora-Workstation-netinst-x86_64-22.iso: No such file or directoryFedora-Workstation-netinst-x86_64-22.iso: FAILED open or readFedora-Live-Workstation-x86_64-22-3.iso: FAILEDsha256sum: WARNING: 20 lines are improperly formattedsha256sum: WARNING: 1 listed file could not be readsha256sum: WARNING: 1 computed checksum did NOT matchThe first two sha256sum message lines above are expected, since the ...netinst-x86...iso file doesn't exist in my directory.  Investigating the ...Live... checksum verification failure, I got:$ sha256sum Fedora-Live-Workstation-x86_64-22-3.iso50f1b411a7be82fc4dee6de6ad66c27280e80567db92a0599a237f3a0647b1f1  Fedora-Live-Workstation-x86_64-22-3.isoHas anyone else gotten the same results that I did?With respect to the checksum file downloaded from the following urlgetfedora.org/en/static/checksums/Fedora-Workstation-22-x86_64-CHECKSUMwhat is the significance of the sha256sum: WARNING: 20 lines are improperly formatted message?
checksum failed on workstation live fedora 22 64bit download
fedora;download