Just looking for the difference between2>&-2>/dev/null|&&>/dev/null>/dev/null 2>&1and their portability with non-Bourne shells like tcsh, mksh, etc.
Difference between 2>&-, 2>/dev/null, |&, &>/dev/null and >/dev/null 2>&1
shell;io redirection;file descriptors;csh;portability
For background:a number 1 = standard out (i.e. STDOUT)a number 2 = standard error (i.e. STDERR)if a number isn't explicitly given, then number 1 is assumed by the shell (bash)First let's tackle the function of these. For reference see the Advanced Bash-Scripting Guide.Functions2>&-The general form of this one is M>&-, where M is a file descriptor number. This will close output for whichever file descriptor is referenced, i.e. M.2>/dev/nullThe general form of this one is M>/dev/null, where M is a file descriptor number. This will redirect the file descriptor, M, to /dev/null.2>&1The general form of this one is M>&N, where M & N are file descriptor numbers. It combines the output of file descriptors M and N into a single stream.|&This is just an abbreviation for 2>&1 |. It was added in Bash 4.&>/dev/nullThis is just an abbreviation for >/dev/null 2>&1. It redirects file descriptor 2 (STDERR) and descriptor 1 (STDOUT) to /dev/null.>/dev/nullThis is just an abbreviation for 1>/dev/null. It redirects file descriptor 1 (STDOUT) to /dev/null.Portability to non-bash, tcsh, mksh, etc.I've not dealt much with other shells outside of csh and tcsh. My experience with those 2 compared to bash's redirection operators, is that bash is superior in that regard. See the tcsh man page for more details.Of the commands you asked about none are directly supported by csh/tcsh. You'd have to use different syntaxes to construct similar functions.