Related to this question (and even this Stack Overflow's one) I have been trying to avoid blocking the code. So what I understood it's that is preferable to make all the methods that rely on an async one async themselve (thus not defeating the purpose of asynchronous). Therefore I have changed my code to do the following (I include here more layers than in the questions I linked as I had to change accordingly those).My API, exposing a method:[Route(api/postconfiguration)]public async Task<IHttpActionResult> PostConfiguration(configurationData configurationData){    try    {        await _configurationRequestHandler.HandlePostRequest(configurationData);        return Ok();    }    catch (Exception e)    {        // Log error        return InternalServerError(e);    }}That uses this method:public async Task HandlePostRequest(Data Data){    var configuration = await _ConfigurationService.GetConfigurationAsync(Data.AgentId);    // Use that configuration}And this would be the method calling the external apipublic class ConfigurationApiClient : IConfigurationService{    private readonly HttpClient _client;    private const string resourcePath = configuration/{0};    public ConfigurationApiClient(IConfigurationManager configurationManager)    {        _client = new HttpClient();        _client.BaseAddress = new Uri(configurationManager.GetAppSetting(ConfigurationApiUrl));        _client.DefaultRequestHeaders.Accept.Clear();        _client.DefaultRequestHeaders.Accept.Add(new MediaTypeWithQualityHeaderValue(application/json));    }    public async Task<Configuration> GetConfigurationAsync(int agentId)    {        try        {            var response = await _client.GetAsync(String.Format(resourcePath, agentId));            response.EnsureSuccessStatusCode();            return await response.Content.ReadAsAsync<Configuration>();        }        catch (HttpRequestException ex)        {            throw new Exception(string.Format(Exception when getting  configuration for agent: {0}, agentId), ex);        }    }}This is my understanding of what I should do for making it asynchronous, but would appreciate if someone points me any error.I am using the API on one client myself, which does this:public async Task DeployConfiguration(Package package, EFEnvironment environment){    using (var client = new HttpClient())    {        // Prepare the configurationData        var agentTasks = agents.Select(a =>            {                var configurationPostRequest = new ConfigurationData                    {                        // Create it                    };                return client.PostAsJsonAsync(api/postconfiguration, configurationPostRequest);            });        await Task.WhenAll(agentTasks);    }}Which is just called inside a sync method:_deployApiService.DeployConfiguration(package, environment);
Async - await all the way
c#;async await;asp.net web api
Your code falls into a classic trap, which IMO is a design error by Microsoft. 99% of the time, await Foo(); should be await Foo().ConfigureAwait(false);. The semi-official guidance isTo summarize this third guideline, you should use ConfigureAwait when possible. Context-free code has better performance for GUI applications and is a useful technique for avoiding deadlocks when working with a partially async codebase. The exceptions to this guideline are methods that require the context.I think that it would have been far better for ConfigureAwait(false) to be the default and to require ConfigureAwait(true) in those cases which require context, but it's too late now for Microsoft to change this, so we should all get into the habit of using ConfigureAwait(false) by default and in those rare cases documenting the reason for leaving it off (or even explicitly using ConfigureAwait(true) and supplementing it with a comment which gives the reason).