I know that I can sort the output of ls by time with the -t option.I know that when I have so many files that they don't fit in a single ls invocation, I can normally use xargs (or find ... -exec ... {} +) to let ls be called multiple times.How can I combine the two? I have more files than fit on the command-line, and wish to list them sorted by time. find . -type f -exec ls -t {} + doesn't work, because supposing exactly 1000 file names fit on the command-line, and 3000 files are present, this will run ls -t [first 1000 files]; ls -t [second 1000 files]; ls -t [last 1000 files], where the last 1000 files find sees may well have a modification time before any of the first 1000. It doesn't seem like anything involving xargs or equivalent has any chance whatsoever of working, it seems like that approach is fundamentally flawed, but I cannot find a way that does work.
Sorting ls output by time, when there are too many files for a single invocation
shell;ls
ls -t on its own will list all files in the current directory with that sorting, without ever needing to list them on the command line at all.If you need the recursion behaviour of find, or to do some other tests on the files, you can have find generate timestamped entries, either through stat or through GNU find's -printf option and sort it. Something like:find . -type f -printf '%T@ %p\0' | sort -zn-printf '%T@ %p\0' generates null-separated Unix timestamp (%T@)-filename (%p) pairs. sort -z is also a non-standard GNU extension, which uses null-delimited records to be filename-safe. The sort option is supported in most of the BSDs too, but -printf is GNU-only as far as I know.You can cut that output back into filenames only, or any other format you like.