HTTP redirects are done via HTTP codes 301, and 302 (maybe other codes also) and a header field known as Location which has the address of the new place to go.  However, browsers always send a GET request to that URL.However, many times you need to redirect your user to another domain via POST (bank payments for example).  This is a common scenario, and really a requirement.  Does anybody know why such a common requirement has been neglected in HTTP specification?  The workaround is to send a form (with parameters in hidden fields) with action set to the target location (the value of the Location header field) and use setTimeout to submit the form to the target location.
Why doesn't HTTP have POST redirect?
web development;web applications;http
In HTTP 1.1, there actually is a status code (307) which indicates that the request should be repeated using the same method and post data. As others have said, there is a potential for misuse here which may be why many frameworks stick to 301 and 302 in their abstractions. However, with proper understanding and responsible usage, you should be able to accomplish what you're looking for. Note that according to the W3.org spec, when the METHOD is not HEAD or GET, user agents should prompt the user before re-executing the request at the new location. You should also provide a note and a fallback mechanism for the user in case old user agents aren't sure what to do with a 307. Using this form:<form action=Test307.aspx method=post>    <input type=hidden name=test value=the test />    <input type=submit value=test />    </form>And having Test307.aspx simply return 307 with the Location:http://google.com, Chrome 13 and Fiddler confirm that test=the test is indeed posted to Google. Of course the further response is a 405 since Google doesn't allow the POST, but it shows the mechanics.For more information see List of HTTP status codes and the W3.org spec.307 Temporary Redirect (since HTTP/1.1) In this occasion, the request  should be repeated with another URI, but future requests can still use  the original URI.2 In contrast to 303, the request method should not  be changed when reissuing the original request. For instance, a POST  request must be repeated using another POST request.