Many un*x systems ship with a user account named 'operator'. What is the purpose of this account?Do some systems actually make use of this account, or is this more of a historical legacy? Have you ever made use of this account in your organization?The 'operator' account tends have a home directory set to something like /root or /. Why is this?Linux:Login: operator                         Name: operatorDirectory: /root                        Shell: /sbin/nologinOr FreeBSD:Login: operator                         Name: System OperatorDirectory: /                            Shell: /usr/sbin/nologinOn FreeBSD, some files are actually owned by user 'operator':# find / -user operator -exec ls -ld {} \;drwx------  2 operator  operator  512 Apr 20 17:11 /var/db/entropyThis question is surprisingly hard to google, since nearly all google results are regarding shell or code operators.
What is the point of the 'operator' user?
users;history;administration
The concept of operators origins from the second generation of computers. Back at that time, programmers used to write code on punch cards, then deliver the cards to an operator - professional staff with access to the insanely expensive mainframe machine. The operator was responsible for putting the cards on the machine for execution. When the execution was done, the operator would collect the output and the cards and deliver them back to the programmer. During the third generation, when the first UNIXes appeared, the need for the original operators was eliminated, since time-sharing has already been introduced and programmers could write code using their own dumb terminals. Thus I will agree with Gerald and Matt that the user operator on UNIX systems was meant for doing low privileged administrative tasks (replacing tapes, backups, maintenance, etc.).