In my opinion, every imperfect information game where there is the possibility of bluffing lacks a perfect (or winning) strategy, for the simple reason that knowing your opponent's strategy will let you beat him easily (even if his strategy isn't 100% deterministic).So why do the guys that developed 'Cepheus' claim that they made a program playing poker with a perfect strategy, claiming that their AI 'is guaranteed to not lose money in the long run' ?I'm pretty sure I can create a strategy winning versus Cepheus, because I know its strategy.Where am I wrong ?
that there would be no perfect strategy for poker
artificial intelligence;game theory