I've just recently noticed there is an option to have static methods in interfaces. Same as with static fields of interface, there is an interesting behavior: These are not inherited.I'm unsure it's any useful in the actual interfaces that are to be implemented. However, it enables the programmer to create interfaces that are just envelopes for static stuff, like e.g. utility classes are.A simple example is just an envelope for global constants. Compared to a class, you can easily notice the missing boilerplate of public static final as those are assumed (making it less verbose).public interface Constants {    String LOG_MESSAGE_FAILURE = I took an arrow to the knee.;    int DEFAULT_TIMEOUT_MS = 30;}You could also make something more complex, like this pseudo-enum of config keys.public interface ConfigKeys {    static createValues(ConfigKey<?>... values) {        return Collections.unmodifiableSet(new HashSet(Arrays.asList(values)));    }    static ConfigKey<T> key(Class<T> clazz) {        return new ConfigKey<>(clazz);    }    class ConfigKey<T> {        private final Class<T> type;        private ConfigKey(Class<T> type) {            this.type = type;        }        private Class<T> getType() {            return type;        }    }}import static ConfigKeys.*;public interface MyAppConfigKeys {    ConfigKey<Boolean> TEST_MODE = key(Boolean.class);    ConfigKey<String> COMPANY_NAME = key(String.class);    Set<ConfigKey<?>> VALUES = createValues(TEST_MODE, COMPANY_VALUE);    static values() {        return VALUES;    }}You could also create some utility class this way. However, in utilities, it is often useful to use private or protected helper methods,  which is not quite possible in classes.I consider it a nice new feature, and especially the fact the static members aren't inherited is an interesting concept that was introduced to interfaces only.I wonder if you can consider it a good practice. While code style and best practices aren't axiomatic and there is room for opinion, I think there are usually valid reasons backing the opinion.I'm more interested in the reasons (not) to use patterns like these two.Note that I don't intend to implement those interfaces. They are merely an envelope for their static content. I only intend to use the constants or methods and possibly use static import.
Is static interface a good practice?
java;java8