For release: January 25, 2011
Communications Office (202) 633-3055
Study States That Tiger Numbers Could Triple if Large-Scale Landscapes are Protected Protecting Core Breeding Sites, Developing Forest Corridors and Providing Benefits to Local Communities Can Ensure Tiger Population Growth
The tiger reserves of Asia could support more than 10,000 wild tigers—three times the current number—if they are managed as large-scale landscapes that allow for connectivity between core breeding sites, according to a new paper from scientists at the Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute and other world-leading conservation researchers. The study is the first assessment of the political commitment made by all 13 tiger-range countries at November’s tiger summit to double the tiger population across Asia by 2022.
“A Landscape-Based Conservation Strategy to Double the Wild Tiger Population” in the current issue of Conservation Letters, finds that the commitment to double tiger numbers is not only possible but can be exceeded. However, it will take a global effort to ensure that core breeding reserves are maintained and connected via habitat corridors.
Wild tiger numbers have declined from about 100,000 in the early 1900s to as few as 3,200 today due to poaching of tigers and their prey, habitat destruction and human/tiger conflict. Most of the remaining tigers are scattered in small, isolated pockets across their range in 13 Asian countries.
“Tiger conservation is the face of biodiversity conservation and competent sustainable land-use management at the landscape level,” said study co-author John Seidensticker, head of SCBI’s Conservation Ecology Center. “By saving the tiger we save all the plants and animals that live under the tiger’s umbrella.”
The paper’s authors found that the 20 priority tiger conservation landscapes with the highest probability of long-term tiger survival could support more than 10,500 tigers, including about 3,400 breeding females. They also looked at historical examples to prove that doubling or tripling the population is possible using large landscapes:
Besides poaching and habitat loss, the $7.5 trillion in infrastructure projects like roads, dams and mines that will be invested in Asia over the next decade threaten tiger landscapes. Developers and politicians may see a focus only on core sites and protected areas like reserves, instead of larger landscapes, as a green light to move forward with harmful infrastructure projects outside of core sites. The authors insist that conservationists and governments must be involved in helping design infrastructure projects to mitigate their impacts on tigers both inside core sites and in current and potential forest corridors.
“In the midst of a crisis, it’s tempting to circle the wagons and only protect a limited number of core protected areas, but we can and should do better,” said Eric Dinerstein, chief scientist at the U.S. World Wildlife Fund and a co-author of the study. “We absolutely need to stop the bleeding, the poaching of tigers and their prey in core breeding areas, but we need to go much further and secure larger tiger landscapes before it is too late.”
SCBI and partnering organizations in the Global Tiger Initiative are currently hosting a monthlong course in Thailand aimed at teaching wildlife officers, field managers and researchers from tiger-range countries best practices to bolster the animals’ numbers. The goal of the Global Tiger Initiative—a project that involves SCBI, the World Bank Group and partnering organizations—is to double the number of tigers in the wild by 2022—the next year of the tiger.
For updates from Thailand, visit the National Zoo’s Global Tiger Initiative page. For more information about the Global Tiger Initiative, visit its official website. SCBI, which is headquartered in Front Royal, Va., serves as an umbrella for the Smithsonian’s National Zoo’s global effort to conserve species and train future generations of conservationists.
# # #
The study’s authors are: Eric Wikramanayake, Eric Dinerstein, Bivash Pandev, Igor Chestin, Seng Teak, Peter Cutter and Utin Than of WWF; A.J.T. Johnsingh of Nature Conservation Foundation, India and WWF; Guangshun Jiang of WWF and Northeast Forestry University, P.R. China; John Seidensticker, Susan Lumpkin and Jonathan Ballou of the Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute; Mahendra Shrestha of Save the Tiger Fund, National Fish and Wildlife Foundation; Hemanta Mishra of The Bridge Fund; Sunarto Sunarto and Kanchan Thapa of Virginia Polytechnic Institute; Sivananthan Elagupillay of Department of Wildlife and National Parks, Malaysia; Hemanta Kafley of the University of Missouri, Columbia; Narendra Man Babu Pradhan of the Department of National Parks and Wildlife, Nepal; Karma Jigme of the Department of Forests & Park Services, Bhutan; Md. Abdul Aziz, Jahangirnagar University & Wildlife Trust of Bangladesh.
# # #