Senator Claro M. Recto was the main proponent of the then Rizal Bill. He sought to sponsor the bill at Congress. However, this was met with stiff opposition from the Catholic Church. During the 1955 Senate election, the church charged Recto with being a communist and an anti-Catholic. After Recto's election, the Church continued to oppose the bill mandating the reading of Rizal's novels Noli Me Tangere and El Filibusterismo, claiming it would violate freedom of conscience and religion.
In the campaign to oppose the Rizal bill, the Catholic Church urged its adherents to write to their congressmen and senators showing their opposition to the bill; later, it organized symposiums. In one of these symposiums, Fr. Jesus Cavanna argued that the novels belonged to the past and that teaching them would misrepresent current conditions. Radio commentator Jesus Paredes also said that Catholics had the right to refuse to read them as it would "endanger their salvation".
Groups such as Catholic Action of the Philippines, the Congregation of the Mission, the Knights of Columbus, and the Catholic Teachers Guild organized opposition to the bill; they were countered by Veteranos de la Revolucion (Spirit of 1896), Alagad in Rizal, the Freemasons, and the Knights of Rizal. The Senate Committee on Education sponsored a bill co-written by both Jose P. Laurel and Recto, with... [continues]
Cite This Essay
(2012, 11). Summary of Rizal. StudyMode.com. Retrieved 11, 2012, from http://www.studymode.com/essays/Summary-Of-Rizal-1223527.html
"Summary of Rizal" StudyMode.com. 11 2012. 2012. 11 2012 <http://www.studymode.com/essays/Summary-Of-Rizal-1223527.html>.
- MLA 7
"Summary of Rizal." StudyMode.com. StudyMode.com, 11 2012. Web. 11 2012. <http://www.studymode.com/essays/Summary-Of-Rizal-1223527.html>.
"Summary of Rizal." StudyMode.com. 11, 2012. Accessed 11, 2012. http://www.studymode.com/essays/Summary-Of-Rizal-1223527.html.