Correlations: Nibiru - NASA & Modern Science (Part Two)
Everything about Nibiru (Planet X) in correlation to NASA and our Modern Science. Part Two. ...
(If you haven't read "Part One", I suggest you to do so by clicking here).
Sumerian - NASA correlations
Ancient Sumerian and Babylonian texts indicate that the Earth (" Tiamat ") was struck by a large planet, which moved it into its present orbit, and created the Asteroid Belt.
Nibiru entered our solar system on its clockwise elliptical course, struck Tiamat (Earth), which was moving in its ordained counterclockwise orbit. One of Nibiru's satellites struck Tiamat first, followed by two more of Nibiru's moons. Then Nibiru itself, an enormous planetary body, struck Tiamat, smashing one half of the planet into pieces, which became the "Great Band" (Asteroid Belt). The other half of the planet, which was struck by a smaller moon of Nibiru, was moved into a new orbit, along with a chunk of material which became its moon (or Nibiru "gave" us one of its Moons). The new planet was then called "KI," meaning "cleaved one." The Earth's original moons were dispersed, many changing the direction of their orbits.
Planet X (Nibiru) being pulled into our inner Solar System due to the gravitational pull of the outer planets.
The reference to killing off the dinosaurs (from Part One) seems to indicate that something more is known about this planet than NASA is letting on. Is this in fact a reference to the planet Nibiru of ancient infamy, the planet which, according to ancient sources, did in fact strike the Earth (Tiamat) in ancient times, and gave us a moon for a thank you? Regardless of what NASA really knows, silence is golden, and, for the most part, mum was the word on the issue of Planet X during the 1990s. Instead, scientific journals began to debunk the issue of a tenth solar system planet. In the 1990s, news stories began to dwell on "runaway planets" and "rebel planets" discovered in other solar systems. The issue of Planet X has now become entirely befuddled with recent discoveries of 18 nearby stars with Jupiter-class planets orbiting them (last count as of October, 1999). (see astron.berkeley.edu) Locating any new developments regarding a tenth solar system planet is akin to finding a needle in a haystack, since it's difficult to know which "new planet" they are talking about. For instance, an October 23, 1996 AP article entitled "New rebel planet found outside the solar system," disclosed the following:
"A new planet that breaks all the rules about how and where planets form has been identified in orbit of a twin star about 70 light years from Earth in a constellation commonly known as the Northern Cross. The new planet has a roller coaster like orbit that swoops down close to its central star and then swings far out into frigid fringes, following a strange egg-shaped orbit that is unlike that of any other known planet."
-The March 16, 1999 announcement by NASA at the 30th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference in Houston of the theory of the origin of Earth's Moon as a catastrophic collision with a "Mars-size planet."
-Hubble's recent discovery of 18 (at last count) stars, and numerous Jupiter-size planets (last count 9) with highly elliptical orbits and retrograde (counterclockwise) orbits. Such orbits are now understood to be quite the norm in nearby solar systems, although they are considered peculiar in our own.
-The 1994 announcement by NASA of a one-mile wide moon orbiting the 33-mile wide asteroid Ida, which follows the expectation that if a planetary body in this solar system exploded (or collided), the debris will be gravitationally bound in orbits around a primary body.
-The discovery of water, atmosphere and perhaps previous life on Mars, the Moon and Europa.
-There is a strange gravitational "pull" on Uranus, Neptune and Pluto, which indicates there is another body of significant size beyond it.
NIBIRU / PLANET-X COVER UP!
Tom van Flandern of the U.S. Naval Observatory, who was quoted in the 1982 Newsweek article, admits that a tenth planet is possible, but argues that it would have to be so huge that it should have been observed by now. We must admit that there is a serious possibility that more details regarding Planet X are in fact known, but we are not being informed. Is there a major cover-up of Planet X ? This possibility was actually discussed in an article in the CCNet Digest on May 18, 1998 entitled "The Secrets of Asteroid Peril, British Media Smells a Rat." This article claimed that a report in the London Daily Mail accused US astronomers of trying to cover up scientific data until NASA has a chance to look at the information. The report indicated that "earth-shattering" information, such as the discovery of incoming comets or asteroids, has been ordered to go through NASA first. The Daily Mail report of May 15, 1998 entitled "Delayed Impact, or the Secrets of Asteroid Peril," stated the following:
"If a giant asteroid is hurtling in the general direction of our planet, we will be the last to know about it. For astronomers have decided that the news would be too earth shattering for ordinary mortals to handle, and would likely cause widespread panic. In a week that sees the release of the film Deep Impact, a fictional account of just such a catastrophe, astronomers funded by the American space agency NASA have now agreed to keep asteroid and comet discoveries to themselves for 48 hours while more detailed calculations are made. The findings would then go to NASA, which would wait another 24 hours before going public."
A Los Angeles AP article on May 19, 1998 also reported on this 72 hour delay rule imposed by NASA on announcements to the public of asteroids or comets by astronomers. The report indicated that these measures were undertaken to avoid the "doomsday alert" which occurred in March of 1998 with regard to an asteroid which was due to collide with Earth in 2028, and which was "soon found to be a mistake." These new procedures, the article stated, are "not an attempt to hide anything but to make sure the information is accurate." How can we be sure that if the information is found to be accurate, NASA will not (a) find it to be a "mistake," or (b) withhold the message for a longer period of time?
Article entitle: "X Marks the Spot"
In February, 1999, J.B. Murray presented a paper to the Royal Astronomical Society entitled "Arguments for the Presence of a Distant Large Undiscovered Solar System Planet."
Murray's paper explored various explanations for what he called a "non-random clustering of long-period comets," which his research concluded are "aligned along a great circle inclined to both the elliptic and the Galactic plane." His paper examined the possibility that this non-random clustering was due to "orbital perturbations by an undiscovered object orbiting within the distances of 30,000 to 50,000 au from the Sun." Murray's mathematical modeling predicted that the object would have a retrograde orbit inclined at 120 degrees.
In an October 16, 1999 Economist article entitled "X Marks the Spot," Drs. Murray and Matese, after looking at the orbits of approximately 300 long-period comets, have separately concluded that too many of them are coming from the same regions of space. They suggest that the galaxy's "tidal wobble" is "being modulated by the gravity of something big within the Oort Cloud itself."
The new object must be very faint, these astronomers suggest, or it would have been spotted. This means it's not a star. They predict that the object is three times the size of Jupiter. They also suggest that the object is not a "proper planet," because, take note: "its orbit appears to run in the opposite direction from those of the nine known planets." This is another factoid we can add to the above "anomalous" findings regarding the existence of Nibiru (or Marduk after the Babylonian texts). As the Enuma elish tells us, the planet Marduk entered the solar system on its "clockwise, elliptical orbit," and struck the Earth, which was moving in its "ordained counterclockwise orbit." So the planet we are looking for will have an orbit which runs in the opposite direction from those of the nine known planets in our solar system. (Chalk another one up for Sitchin!)
According to the above Economist article, the orbit of this object also appears to be so unstable that it is unlikely that it could have maintained this orbit for the 4.5 billion year history of the solar system. Therefore, these astronomers suggest, it is more likely that the object is an extra-solar body that was captured by our sun's gravity only "recently," in astronomical terms. (Otherwise, it would have wreaked virtual havoc throughout the history of the solar system. Of course, we are presuming that our neck of the galactic woods is serene because we've been left here in peace to "evolve" for so long that Planet X would have to be a relative newcomer to fit into this preconceived scenario.) In any case, these astronomers predict we should be detecting Planet X soon, even if we have to wait for the next generation of infra-red space telescopes.
It's interesting to note that many of the newly discovered extra-solar planets recently discovered have extremely "eccentric" orbits. It is suggested in "New Discoveries, A Planetary Mystery" (astron.berkeley.edu) that circular orbits may actually not be the rule in nearby solar systems. Nine of the extra-solar objects recently discovered travel in unusually elliptical orbits, "several of them plunging in relatively close to their stars and then swinging far out again." Several of these planets may be three times as massive as Jupiter, and one is estimated at eleven times the mass of Jupiter. What these new discoveries are teaching us is that our own solar system may be very unlike others. Even considering our catastrophic past, we may inhabit a relatively peaceful end of the cosmos, as far as galaxies go. As Dr. Geoffrey Marcy explains, powerful gravitational forces exerted over smaller planets by huge planets or passing stars are capable of upsetting their orbits. Likewise, two or more huge planets orbiting in close proximity can generate a "gravitational slingshot" effect, which could fling one of the objects off on an elongated orbit into the inner planetary system, while the other could at the same time fly off in the other direction, perhaps escaping into interstellar space. In another possible scenario, the planet's own star (sun) could be part of a binary star system, locked in a gravitational embrace.
Although this discussion is being avoided in what little news there is on Planet X, the existence of a mysterious outer solar system planet suggests that we could be living in a two star solar system. What distant gravitational body is causing this planet to make such an enormous wayward loop? One thing is sure, such a companion star would be very capable of exerting a catastrophic influence on the orbits of the outer solar system planets. As Dr. Marcy writes: "We are realizing that most of the Jupiter-like planets far from their stars tool around in elliptical orbits, not circular orbits, which are the rule in our solar system." Why our largest planets remain in circular orbits is, therefore, a mystery. As Dr. Marcy notes:
"Jupiter sized bodies plunging toward and away from their stars are likely to sweep aside smaller worlds, sending them crashing into their star or flying out of orbit into interstellar space. Current technology is incapable of detecting Earth-size planets around other stars, but they almost certainly could not exist near their star's warmth in a system so unsettled by large planets in wrecking orbits."
A huge planet on an elliptical orbit would probably scatter or destroy smaller planets as it crosses their paths time and again. As Dr. Marcy writes, "if our Jupiter were in an eccentric orbit, the Earth and Mars would likely be gravitationally scattered out of the solar system. Therefore, our very existence, he writes, is dependent upon both Jupiter and Earth being in mutually stable and circular orbits." Lucky for us, we have no big bullies, no freewheeling wrecking balls, in our solar system. Or do we?
In assimilating this information into our world view, we have to realize that our science is missing large areas of information with regard to geometric interplanetary relationships in our solar system's cosmic dance, and the peculiar physics of a shared outer solar system planet or twin sun scenario, and the connection this might have on both Earth's climate and rotation, and also, as strange as it may sound, on space-time reality and human consciousness.
We are being spoken to in a forgotten ancient language, and we've got to wake up fast to the meaning of the message.
NIBIRU IS SOMEWHERE CLOSE!
Before we can go further, please watch this short video:
Google Earth and Google Sky are made from pictures took years ago. This part of our Galaxy was photographed in 2007 (or before and posted then). In the above and bellow videos we can see an intentionally cut rectangle from Google Sky, where Nibiru and its moons were located back in 2007.
Now, after seeing the videos what if I tell you that I have the missing picture, that was cut from Google Sky in 2009, just before the first video?
Well, see for yourself!Nibiru will pass between Mars and Jupiter and we will be here to see this astonishing event. The elites hide the planet from us because if the planet is real then the Sumerian texts are real. If the texts are real, then...THE REPTILIAN ANUNNAKI ARE REAL! And they are!