law: Indian Easements Act, 1882
  50. Servant owner not entitled to require continuance 
  The servant owner has no right to require that an easement be
  
  continued; and notwithstanding the provisions of section 26, he is not entitled
  
  to compensation for damage caused to the servant heritage in consequence of the
  
  extinguishment or suspension of the easement, if the dominant owner has given
  
  to the servant owner such notice as will enable him, without unreasonable
  
  expense, to protect the servant heritage from such damage.
  Compensation for damages caused by extinguishment or
  
  suspension: Where such notice has not been given, the servant owner is
  
  entitled to compensation for damage caused to the servant heritage in
  
  consequence of such extinguishment or suspension.
  Illustration
  A, in exercise of an easement, diverts to his canal the water of
  
  B's stream. The diversion continues for many years, and during that time the
  
  bed of the stream partly fills up. A then abandons his easement, and restores
  
  the stream to its ancient course. B's land is consequently flooded. B sues A
  
  for compensation for the damage caused by the flooding. It is proved that A
  
  gave B a month’s notice of his intention to abandon the easement, and that such
  
  notice was sufficient to enable B, without unreasonable expense, to have
  
  prevented the damage. The suit must be dismissed.