law: Arbitration Act 1940
  Section 48
  Conditions for Enforcement of Foreign Awards
  (1) Enforcement of a foreign award may be
  
  refused, at the request of the party against whom it is invoked, only if that furnishes
  
  to the court proof that -
  (a) the parties to the
  
  agreement referred to in section 44 were, under the law applicable to them,
  
  under some incapacity, or the said agreement is not valid under the law to
  
  which the parties have subjected it or, failing any indication thereon, under
  
  the law of the country where the award was made; or
  (b)  the 
  
  party against whom the award is invoked was not given proper notice of the
  
  appointment of the arbitrator or of the arbitral proceedings or was otherwise
  
  unable to present his case; or
  (c)  the 
  
  award deals with a difference not contemplated by or not falling within the
  
  terms of the submission to arbitration, or it contains decisions on matters
  
  beyond the scope of the submission to arbitration:
  Provided  that, if the decisions on matters submitted to
  
  arbitration can be separated from those not so submitted, that part of the
  
  award which contains decisions on matters submitted to arbitration may be
  
  enforced; or
  (d) the composition of
  
  the arbitral authority or the arbitral procedure was not in accordance with the
  
  agreement of the parties, or, failing such agreement, was not in accordance
  
  with the law of the country where the arbitration took place; or
  (e)  the 
  
  award has not yet become binding on the parties, or has been set aside or
  
  suspended by a competent authority of the country in which, or under the law of
  
  which, that award was made.
  (2) Enforcement of an arbitral award may also
  
  be refused if the Court finds that -
  (a)  the 
  
  subject-matter of the difference is not capable of settlement by arbitration
  
  under the law of India  ; or
  (b)  the 
  
  enforcement of the award would be contrary to the public policy of India  .
  Explanation:
  
   Without prejudice to
  
  the generality of clause (b), it is hereby declared, for the avoidance of any
  
  doubt, that an award is in conflict with the public policy of India if the
  
  making of the award was induced or affected by fraud or corruption.
  (3) If an application for the setting aside or
  
  suspension of the award has been made to a competent authority referred to in
  
  clause (e) of sub-section (1) the Court may, if it considers it proper, adjourn
  
  the decision on the enforcement of the award and may also, on the application
  
  of the party claiming enforcement of the award, order the other party to give
  
  suitable security.