law: The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
  48. Conditions for
  
  enforcement of foreign awards.
  1.  
  
    Enforcement
  
  of a foreign award may be refused, at the request of the party against whom it
  
  is invoked, only if that party furnishes to the court proof that-
  a.   the parties to (tic
  
  agreement referred to in section 44 were, under the law applicable to them,
  
  under some incapacity. or the said agreement is not valid under the law to
  
  which the parties have subjected it or, failing any indication thereon, under
  
  the law of the country where the award was made; or
  b.   the party against
  
  whom the award is invoked was not given proper notice of the appointment of the
  
  arbitrator or of the arbitral proceedings or was otherwise unable to present
  
  his case; or
  c.   the award deals with a
  
  difference not contemplated by or not failing within the terms of the
  
  submission to arbitration, or it contains decisions on matters beyond the scope
  
  of the submission to arbitration: Provided that, if the decisions on matter
  
  submitted to arbitration can be separated from those not so submitted, that
  
  pail of the award which contains decisions on matters submitted to arbitration
  
  may be enforced; or
  d.   the composition of
  
  the arbitral authority or the arbitral procedure was not in accordance with the
  
  agreement of the parties, or, failing such agreement, was not in accordance
  
  with the law of the country where the arbitration took place; or
  e.   the award has not yet
  
  become binding on the parties, or has been set aside or suspended by a
  
  competent authority of the country in which. or under the law of which, that
  
  award was made.
  1.  
  
  
  2.  
  
    Enforcement
  
  of an arbitral award may also be refused if the Court finds that-
  a.   the subject-matter of
  
  the difference is not capable of settlement by arbitration under the law of
  
  India; or
  b.   the enforcement of
  
  the award would be contrary to the public policy of India.
  Explanation.-Without
  
  prejudice to the generality of clause (b), it is hereby declared, for the
  
  avoidance of any doubt, that an award is in conflict with the public policy of
  
  India if the making of the award was induced or affected by fraud or
  
  corruption.
  1.  
  
  
  2.  
  
  
  3.  
  
    If
  
  an application for the setting aside or suspension of the award has been made
  
  to a competent authority referred to in clause (e) of sub-section (1) the Court
  
  may, if it considers it proper, adjourn the decision on the enforcement of the
  
  award and may also, on the application of the party claiming enforcement of the
  
  award, order the other party to give suitable security.