law: Sashastra Seema Bal Act, 2007 
  120.  Trial of person not complying with
  
  conditions of pardon.
  1.       Where,
  
  in regard to a person who has accepted a tender of pardon made under section
  
  119, the Judge Attorney, or as the case may be, the Deputy Judge
  
  Attorney-General, or the Additional Judge Attorney-General, or the officer
  
  approved under section 95, certifies that in his opinion such person has,
  
  either by willfully concealing anything essential or by giving false evidence,
  
  not complied with the conditions on which the tender was made, such person may
  
  be tried for the offence in respect of which the pardon was so tendered or for
  
  any other offence of which he appears to have been guilty in connection with
  
  the same matter, and also for the offence of giving false evidence:
  Provided that such person shall not be tried jointly with any of
  
  the other accused.
   1.     
  
     
  2.       Any
  
  statement made by such person accepting the tender of pardon and recorded by
  
  his commanding officer or Force Court may be given in evidence against him at
  
  such trial.
  3.       At such
  
  trial, the accused shall be entitled to plead that he has complied with the
  
  condition upon which such tender was made; in which case it shall be for the
  
  prosecution to prove that the condition has not been complied with.
  4.       At such
  
  trial, the Force Court shall, before arraignment, ask the accused whether he
  
  pleads that he has complied with the conditions on which the tender of pardon
  
  was made.
  5.       If the
  
  accused does so plead, the Court shall record the plea and proceed with the
  
  trial and it shall, before giving its finding on the charge, find whether or
  
  not the accused has complied with the conditions of the pardon, and, if it
  
  finds that he has so complied, it shall give a verdict of not guilty.