In China, the story of Covid-19 and the relationship between government and civil society is not a sharp break from the past China has long guided and controlled the development of civil society organizations, and that has not changed in the Covid era Instead, the Covid era is a story of a continuation in restrictive policy, and responses to Covid have utilized those existing policies and regulatory framework rather than developing new policies for the Covid era The Chinese story may thus somewhat different from others in this special issue China is certainly not a story of, in the words of our issue editors, when "pluralist and social democratic visions fade "The Chinese Party-state's permission for the reemergence of some kinds of civil society organizations in China since the early 1980s has never been marked by pluralist and social democratic visions Instead, it has been marked by Party and state control, and clear choices on what kinds of organizations to facilitate and which kinds to repress That control-based framework has accelerated since the current administration came into office in 2012 Covid has neither upset that restrictive framework nor substantially altered it Instead, the framework of differentiation and constraint employed by the Chinese state has adapted, in some ways, to the need to control Covid and to control public mobilization on it and against the Party-state In this brief article we outline the framework of differentiation and constraint that the Chinese Party-state uses to control the Chinese nonprofit sector, and mention a few ways in which that framework has been used in the Covid era © 2021 Mark Sidel and Ming Hu, published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston 2021
Party, State, Civil Society and Covid-19 in China