OBJECTIVES: Effective and safe COVID‐19 vaccines have been developed and have resulted in decreased incidence and severity of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) infection and can decrease secondary transmission. However, there are concerns about dampened immune responses to COVID‐19 vaccination among immunocompromised patients, including people living with HIV (PLWH), which may blunt the vaccine's efficacy and durability of protection. This study aimed to assess the qualitative SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccine immunogenicity among PLWH after vaccination. METHODS: We conducted targeted COVID‐19 vaccination (all received BNT162b2 vaccine) of PLWH (aged ≥ 55 years per state guidelines) at Yale New Haven Health System and established a longitudinal survey to assess their qualitative antibody responses at 3 weeks after the first vaccination (and prior to receipt of the second dose of the COVID‐19 vaccine) (visit 1) and at 2–3 weeks after the second vaccination (visit 2) but excluded patients with prior COVID‐19 infection. Our goal was to assess vaccine‐induced immunity in the population we studied. Qualitative immunogenicity testing was performed using Healgen COVID‐19 anti‐Spike IgG/IgM rapid testing. Poisson regression with robust standard errors was used to determine factors associated with a positive IgG response. RESULTS: At visit 1, 45 of 78 subjects (57.7%) tested positive for SARS‐CoV‐2 anti‐Spike IgG after the first dose of COVID‐19 vaccine. Thirty‐nine subjects returned for visit 2. Of these, 38 had positive IgG (97.5%), including 20 of 21 subjects (95.2%) with an initial negative anti‐Spike IgG. Our bivariate analysis suggested that participants on an antiretroviral regimen containing integrase strand transfer inhibitors [relative risk (RR) = 1.81, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.92–3.56, p = 0.085] were more likely to seroconvert after the first dose of the COVID‐19 vaccine, while those with a CD4 count < 500 cells/μL (RR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.33–1.05, p = 0.071), and those diagnosed with cancer or another immunosuppressive condition (RR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.18–1.28, p = 0.15) may have been less likely to seroconvert after the first dose of the COVID‐19 vaccine. The direction of these associations was similar in the multivariate model, although none of these findings reached statistical significance (RR(integrase inhibitor) = 1.71, 95% CI: 0.90–3.25, p = 0.10; RR(CD4 count) = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.39–1.19, p = 0.18; RR(cancer or another immunosuppressive condition) = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.19–1.33, p = 0.16). With regard to immunogenicity, we were able to record very high rates of new seroconversion following the second dose of the COVID‐19 vaccine. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that completing a two‐dose series of BNT162b2 vaccine is critical for PLWH given suboptimal seroconversion rates after the first dose and subsequent improved seroconversion rates after the second dose.
Qualitative assessment of anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 spike protein immunogenicity (QUASI) after COVID‐19 vaccination in older people living with HIV