SHOCKING Details Of Hillary Clintons FBI Interview Emerge (Was She Treated Differently?) On Thursday, July 7, when FBI Director James Comey appeared before a Congressional committee to explain just WHY there would be no charges recommended to be filed against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton given the laundry list of crimes he outlined at a press conference two days prior, not many people were expecting another couple bombshells: It seems that recording interviews is not regularly done by the FBI, or so a The Hill piece explains: There is a form summary of the interview, but no one at the bureau seemed to think that a case involving crimes of gross negligence when it comes to national security, possible treason, and lying to Congress and the American public warranted an exception. What do lawmakers who have the power to force a change in this policy have to say about it? I dont know about anyone else, but having given a deposition as a witness once, I was sworn in and recorded, but that was in a civil case and that is why Hillarys staff and others were deposed under oath. Those depositions were taken as part of the Judicial Watch civil case, not done by the FBI. Comey did say in his testimony before the House Oversight Committee that he was not among the agents who conducted the interview, but that he did not think the agents called Hillary evasive during the hours she talked to them. More details on the outrageous lack of prosecution to come. Remember, though: Hillary has NOT been cleared. She was just not charged with anything except in the court of public opinion, so there is no pardon, and no double jeopardy in play. She can still be charged by a subsequent administration if We the People vote in large enough numbers to keep her out of office. 