McCarthy Says Shes Killing US Economy - To Show Domestic Leadership Congressman David McKinley (R-WV) needs to get results. He knows its quite pointless for him to be spending his time talking to EPA Chief Gina McCarthy but its the process, one that needs to change. Oversight and the opportunity to air the dictators side of the story are part of the equation, with little in the final results reflecting the wishes and the interests of the American people. Our economic engine must be turned off and that means our manufacturing must go, both by moving it offshore as well as by putting American industry out of business. Eliminate the fuel and the factories cant run. The industry and jobs go elsewhere and America is crippled, weakened and ultimately destroyed. Its not that tough to figure out. McKinley pleads with the little white-headed unisex witch anyway, informing her that China is going to be increasing their use of coal by 460 gigawatts of power and India by another 360 gigawatts. He points to the fact that other countries arent joining the United States in committing economic and political suicide, saying, I dont know what its going to take, the worlds not following our leadership. He reminds McCarthy that Two or three years ago I raised this same question and you were going to get back to me and I never heard back from you again. He asks the same question more or less, saying, According to the IPCC with the United Nations, if we terminated all coal-fired power plants, ended, so we didnt burn one ton of coal in America, the total reduction of CO2 on the globe would only be two-tenths of one percent. Do you think thats a measurable impact on the climate of the world? Especially given that the other nations arent going to follow, so that if we terminate two-tenths but yet the other nations of China and India are going to way more than make up for that loss its worth it to our economy, to put all of our people and our coal companies out of work, for something thats not measurable? She doesnt care, Congressman. Of course its beyond foolish, but shes got an excuse, some philosophical line of crap shes creating especially for you. McCarthy responded by playing dumb and innocent, saying, I am not looking at make any choices on the kinds of energy that are generated, a complete and total lie as her clean power regulations clearly prove. She says, Im really trying to keep my eye on my job, which is to try to reduce pollution in ways that are reasonable. Carbon Dioxide is not pollution and putting our industry and forty percent of our energy supply out of operation in no way resembles anything close to reasonable. Her Humble Nazi approach is a ploy to disarm her opposition and maybe inspire them to go a little easier on her, nothing more. McKinley addresses the war on coal and the administrations decision to place one third of coal reserves off limits. He plays her Chicken Little climate game to make his point, saying, I dont understand, if it doesnt have an impact on climate change around the world, why are we subjecting our hard working taxpayers, men and women in the coal fields, to something that has no benefit? McCarthy doesnt handle facts or exposure well. Faced with both she offers a feeble attempt to justify the Green Tyranny, saying, We see it as having had enormous benefit in showing sort of domestic leadership as well as garnering support around the country for the agreement we reached in Paris. She admits the benefit is one of propaganda and brainwashing, and she considers that to be of enormous importance. McKinley stays on her, hitting back with the real world counter-arguments. He says, No ones following it, and adds, Since that Paris accord, Chinas already announced that theyre going to put up 360. Indias announced that theyre going to double their use of coal, since the Paris accord. It almost looks like our EPA is owned by China or India and is their means of securing a steady supply of coal that otherwise would have been wasted fueling American industry. In other questioning, Rep. John Shimkus (R-IL), chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Environment and the Economy told her, By cutting EPAs budget and reducing its staff levels, our intent is that youll refocus your limited resources toward implementing and enforcing congressionally authorized core missions and policies. We want you to do your job no more, no less. House Appropriations Chairman Hal Rogers (R-KY) advised McCarthy that the EPA will not receive the $50 million they requested in its fiscal 2017 budget in order to implement the Clean Power Plan mandates. Rep. Ed Whitfield (R-Ky.), chairman of the Energy and Power Subcommittee, told McCarthy there is real angst over the Clean Power Plan. He pledge that his committee would be aggressive in making sure the agency was following the Supreme Courts ruling, saying, We are going to do everything we can do to do serious oversight to make sure that the stay issued by the Supreme Court is followed. It seems the voters may have their representatives attention, at least in the short term, until November. Im Rick Wells a constitutional conservative writer who recognizes that our nation, our Constitution and our traditions are under a full scale assault from multiple threats. Im not PC; I call it like I see it. Please SUBSCRIBE in the right sidebar athttp://RickWells.usorhttp://constitutionrising.comto receive our posts directly. Thank You Rick Wells. 