Paris Shooting Suspects Under French Radar for YEARSTony Cartalucci Slate Magazine would report in their article, The Details of Paris Suspect Cherif Kouachis 2008 Terrorism Conviction, that: Kouachi was arrested in January 2005, accused of planning to join jihadists in Iraq. He was said to have fallen under the sway of Farid Benyettou, a young self-taught preacher who advocated violence, but had not actually yet traveled to Iraq or committed any acts of terror. Lawyers at the time said he had not received weapons training and had begun having second thoughts, going so far as to express relief that hed been apprehended. Strange then that Kourachi and his brother would then be reported to have traveled to the Middle East to receive training from Al Qaeda, then to have fought in Syria in a war backed in part by France, before returning home and carrying out this most recent terror attack, all while being tracked by French intelligence. If Kouachi could be arrested for association with wrongdoers with the intention of committing a terrorist act, why wasnt he arrested immediately upon his return to France for having received and employed military training by a terrorist organization? CNN would report in an article titled, France tells U.S. Paris suspect trained with al Qaeda in Yemen, that: Western intelligence officials are scrambling to learn more about possible travel of the two Paris terror attack suspects, brothers Said and Cherif Kouachi, with new information suggesting one of the brothers recently spent time in Yemen associating with al Qaeda in that country, U.S. officials briefed on the matter told CNN. Additional information from a French source close to the French security services puts one of the brothers in Syria. To explain how terrorists well known to Frances legal system and intelligence community could simply disappear, the Wall Street Journal in an article titled, Overburdened French Dropped Surveillance of Brothers, would attempt to claim: The terror attacks in Paris that have killed 17 people over three days this week represent one of the worst fearsand failuresof counterterrorist officials: a successful plot coordinated by people who had once been under surveillance but who were later dropped as a top priority. The U.S. provided France with intelligence showing that the gunmen in the Charlie Hebdo massacre received training in Yemen in 2011, prompting French authorities to begin monitoring the two brothers, according to U.S. officials. But that surveillance of Said and Chrif Kouachi came to an end last spring, U.S. officials said, after several years of monitoring turned up nothing suspicious. It is a narrative that begs to be believed considering the brothers had already tangled with the law, already traveled to Yemen to receive training from Al Qaeda, and with evidence suggesting they were indeed still being tracked since it is now known they have recently returned from Syria. The Wall Street Journal would also claim that France depends heavily on US intelligence, contradicting US intelligence officials who have said their information came from their French counterparts. France reportedly has over 1,000 citizens under surveillance who have recently traveled to Iraq and Syria, believed to have fought alongside terrorists France itself has been arming. In an NBC article titled, French Intelligence Is Tracking 1,000 Who Have Been to Iraq, Syria: Expert, it is reported that: French intelligence is mostly focused today on more than 1,000 French citizens that traveled to Syria and Iraq since 2012, said Jean-Charles Brisard, the author of Zarqawi: The New Face of Al-Qaeda. He added that one-fifth of them were being tracked around the clock. This is a problem of resources, he added. We cannot follow everyone. Brisard said the brothers had been well known to French intelligence [for] several years now. It is almost certain that the suspects were not only being tracked by French and US intelligence, but selected as prime candidates for pulling off the provocative attack in Paris last week as part of a greater agenda of manipulating public perception to further crush civil liberties at home and expand hegemonic wars overseas. France is already occupying several of its former colonies in Africa, had participated in the destruction of Libya and its subsequent handover to Al Qaeda terrorist, who with NATO backing, used it as a springboard to attack Syria. In fact, it is now confirmed that France had provided weapons to terrorists fighting the Syrian government since 2011. France 24 would report last year in an article titled, France delivered arms to Syrian rebels, Hollande confirms, that: President Francois Hollande said on Thursday that France had delivered weapons to rebels battling the Syrian regime of Bashar al-Assad a few months ago. It is likely that if the Paris shooters were indeed in Syria, they may likely have been holding French-supplied weapons as they honed their skills later to be used to spill French blood in Paris. Three Possibilities All Damning There are really only three possibilities left for France, NATO, and the greater Western World. First, the attacks were known to be impending and were willfully allowed to be carried out with an insidious agenda lined up to fully exploit the public hysteria to follow. Second, the attacks were prodded along by French, US, or other Western or Western-aligned intelligence agencies. Or third, the global spanning surveillance state the West is erecting with the promise of making the world safe at the expense of our freedom has left us both unsafe, and without our freedom. Determining the degree to which this attack was influenced or engineered by Western intelligence agencies will be difficult to establish. However, considering that NATO itself has been exposed in the past to have used extremist groups to carry out deadly terrorist attacks almost identical to the recent Paris shooting, means that Western intelligence agencies should be prime suspects until otherwise ruled out. The shooters were well known to Western intelligence, were part of a Western proxy war in Syria, were under surveillance, most likely handled before and perhaps even during the attack last week, and were all subsequently liquidated, just as was done amid a wave of NATO-sponsored terror attacks against Western Europe during the Cold War, now known as Operation Gladio. Al Qaeda is NATOs Mercenary Foreign Legion Even if these attacks were organized by Al Qaeda, the fact still remains that Al Qaeda was intentionally selected, armed, funded, and to this day backed in nations like Syria by the West, including France, in an effort to overthrow Damascus by proxy. As exposed by Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Seymour Hersh in his 2007 article, The Redirection: Is the Administrations new policy benefiting our enemies in the war on terrorism? it was stated explicitly that (emphasis added): To undermine Iran, which is predominantly Shiite, the Bush Administration has decided, in effect, to reconfigure its priorities in the Middle East. In Lebanon, the Administration has cooperated with Saudi Arabias government, which is Sunni, in clandestine operations that are intended to weaken Hezbollah, the Shiite organization that is backed by Iran. The U.S. has also taken part in clandestine operations aimed at Iran and its ally Syria. A by-product of these activities has been the bolstering of Sunni extremist groups that espouse a militant vision of Islam and are hostile to America and sympathetic to Al Qaeda. Since 2007, it is clear that the so-called Islamic State (ISIS) and various franchises of Al Qaeda operating in Syria are harbored in NATO-member Turkey, with convoys originating from Turkish territory supplying terrorists operating in Syria with an unending torrent of supplies. So even as the US feigns to be striking at the source of ISIS power allegedly seized Syrian oil fields in reality, the US, along with its stalwart Persian Gulf allies Saudi Arabia and Qatar are at the same time supplying this proxy terrorist army with billions in aid year to year aid that is immune to US airstrikes. NATO Extremism However one attempts to examine the recent Paris shooting it is clear it is not an issue of free speech, Islamic extremism, or a need to show tolerance, but rather an issue involving NATO sponsorship of terrorism worldwide, and the complicity or failure of invasive surveillance networks and intelligence agencies that either helped carry out the operation, willfully allowed it to be carried out, or missed it entirely indicating unforgivable incompetence requiring punitive action against those occupying the highest offices in the French government. Whatever the case may be, what follows will be a shameless attempt to exploit the hysteria prevailing across much of Europe. The most immediate threat is the West not backing off from its sponsorship of terrorists fighting the government of Syria, but the doubling down of the very policy that produced the killers involved in the Paris shooting. Indeed, even as Western politicians wring their hands over the loss of life in Paris this week, the Military Times would report, astoundingly, that the US is going ahead with a plan to train, arm, equip, and back a new rebel army. In an article titled, Syria rebel training could start in early spring, it states: The long-awaited coalition program to train the Syrian moderate opposition could begin by early spring, and officials are beginning to identify individual fighters who could participate, the Pentagon said Tuesday. Apparently, despite so-called moderate Syrian rebels being revealed as simply Al Qaeda or Al Qaeda affiliates, with many literally turning their US, French, British and other NATO-supplied weapons over to terrorist groups, the US desires to send yet more weapons, cash, and training in what one could only call a deliberate attempt to feign opposition to Al Qaeda while willfully expanding their ranks and armories, as well as both their tactical and strategic capabilities. It is no wonder then, why the Western media has attempted to focus so diligently on Islamic extremism as the cause of the recent Paris shootings. Should the emotional raw nerves of the European people not be manipulated, and were people simply to follow the money, they would realize NATO extremism was to blame. They would also realize that the backlash in the wake of the Paris shooting was not to help stem such extremism, but to only embolden it further. Tony Cartaluccis articles have appeared on many alternative media websites, including his own at 