Magic Knife Incident Caused NYPD Supporter to Do a 180Amanda Warren When Carsten Vogel noticed the negative social media reaction following NYPD incidents, behavior and the height of the Mayor de Blasio/NYPD face/off he rushed in to defend the men and women in blue. After all, some of his good friends wear badges. He too must have thought that haters gonna hate and someone should pipe up to defend them from unwarranted criticism. He wrote in a thread on Facebook, just a few days after debating someone on the topic: Perhaps he was among the many who also parrot the idea that there are only a few bad eggs around. That if youre not doing anything wrong, theres nothing to worry about Yet, he was about to get a firsthand look into a systemic problem the real aim of modern-day American policing. Coincidentally, the afternoon of January 20th would change that on a very personal level irrevocably Village Voice Blogs reports. Vogels attention was on the music in his earphones while he awaited a train at the Nostrand Avenue stop. Thats when an NYPD officer appeared and asked what was in Vogels pocket. It was a pocket knife attached to a pocket clip. And Vogel responded frankly. Bear with me for this important note Vogel is a conscientious citizen, who strives to follow every letter of the law, so he probably only figures there would ever be a problem for rough bad guys roaming the streets. Not so. But Vogel is so conscientious that he had already looked up the knife laws. His 2-inch common pocket knife with a wooden handle, available on many store shelves. did not break the 4-inch law. It was not a switchblade which is totally illegal in New York. Not only was the pocket knife well within legal confines, but Vogel, like many others, uses it for his job. It brings him much convenience as he cuts tape and cables setting up PA systems. Vogel was compelled to hand it over. With the flick of the wrist, the seized knife becomes magic and reveals its true nature bent toward committing crimes. From Village Voice: Vogel says he had never in his life tried to open his knife like that. It certainly wasnt designed to operate that way. He was stunned. Incredulous, Vogel couldnt stop commenting on what a magic trick he had witnessed. And a well-practiced one at that, he noted. Youre under arrest you broke the law. Not really. Not at all. But the officer said that under NYPDs legal interpretation, Vogel was in possession of a gravity knife and would be going to jail! He would remain in a cell for a few hours and receive a misdemeanor charge for criminal possession of a weapon. This first-ever charge will cost time, work time, in court appearances, and thousands in legal fees. Even this did not initially change his heart. The good cop arresting him was apologetic and tried to comfort him by telling him hed probably get off easy for his criminality. At this point, Vogels still thinking theyre just good fellas doing what they got to do. Until He overheard their conversation about racking up arrest numbers needed to move on up. One of them seemed upset that another was getting promoted after only getting like, two guns and a burglary and few robberies. Big light bulb here. Im just a pawn, he said. Even before, he recalled feeling uneasy at the broken windows [fallacy] type police work. NYPD has alienated a vocal supporter who now has a stronger bond with his friend whom he had debated. They turned an ally into an enemy, he said. To the best of the medias knowledge, New York City police are among the only agency that interprets a old state law this way. From Village Voice: A real gravity knife looks like this. NYPD has yet to explain how this is any more dangerous than a folding knife. And its certainly not switchblade material. Plus, folding knives are legal. Village Voice was so successful in bring this tactic to light that it spawned discussions among lawmakers and police. See the rest of their report as well as How a 50s-Era Knife Law Has Landed Thousands in Jail. Clearly, Vogel did nothing wrong. But who was left to speak up for him? Only Village Voice, and if you count this piece both after the fact. Are we going to have to wait until each and every single person has an experience like this, or a potentially fatal experience, before unacceptable behavior is called out for what it actually is? *The friendly knife has been superimposed on the image Recently fromAmanda Warren: I suspect Vogel will change his mind about NYC cops when he sees how much it will cost him in legal fees . And theyll keep his knife; Asset Forfeiture.. When it comes to highly-controversial cases like this one, many up-and-coming attorneys will do it simply to make a name for themselves especially if they work for an agency that works to end such injustice. The main problem as I see it is the police unions. They will be right there to defend this officers actions, you can be sure. The cop should have simply given him the knife back after the encounter. But hes just flexing his muscle and pushing the limits as they are prone to do. The odd thing is that the cop actually believes he has to act this way to project an aura of deadly unilateral force to keep himself safe on the job. When, in fact, he actually brings about a backlash against such tyranny thereby putting his safety at risk (as well as the safety of cops who do NOT behave this way, it should be noted). Its a type of self-fulfilled prophecy. Did you not get it, he was filling his quota. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there arent enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. Ayn Rand This is part of it, but this was offered as an opinion by the person concerned and is not necessarily the absolute truth of the matter. I agree it plays a part. Around here cops I know admit that they are under pressure to raise revenue. All manner of ridiculous minor traffic infringements are being hit these days, whilst it is obvious that people have on the whole slowed down and begun to drive more carefully. Once they would not charge one for speeding up to 10 kms over the limit in most places, but now it is common to get camera trap fines for a couple of kms over the limit. I got one for exceeding the speed by 4 kmh a few months ago! Police funding of all types should be outright, and not based on any sorts of quota system. As it is now, many municipalities are funding police pension funds with monies they receive from parking and traffic fines. And that obviously introduces a conflict of interest. Absolutely! Police funding should be fixed like all government spending and it should be based on the work theyre expected to do. If they need more money, they can apply like everyone else. Instead they have been granted a kind of pirate license to pillage as necessary for their increased needs or wants. Same problem here. Once they introduced property forfeiture laws here for anyone merely CHARGED with an offense, the cops have been out of control and seemingly interested in revenue raising over all. Not only does a substantial portion of confiscated money (and assets) go to the cop force who made the grab, but this invariably leaves people penniless right when they need to spend big dollars on lawyers. It has the combined effect of making them money and reducing the accused chances of fighting whatever charges they lay on them. Thankyou, your last paragraph helped put things into place for me. Id not thought of the exact angle of fear as motivation for the sort of overactive and extreme policing were seeing, but I think youre correct. It is as you say counterproductive and thats just an example of a self defeating policy by the elite segment of society who in reality use the cops to control us. By ensuring none of them are too bright, they have severely hampered their ability to act with tactical intelligence. This certainly worsens their situation, the backlash is growing in potential every day, but it also practically ensures their failure to handle the backlash when it comes. They will be as lousy at actually winning the conflict as the US military is in its turn. The problem for the elite scum is that intelligent cops would offer them a better chance of surviving the eventual backlash from a public approaching the last straw, but intelligent cops might have realised by now how they are being used and the consequences to themselves and families. What will be will be, even if it is only temporarily sustainable for them. The world is a big place. They have many places to hide if things do get too bad for them in any particular country. Theyre fascists. I think the main problem we are seeing lately with the police is directly attributable to the police unions. They have never had any push-back from society and have therefore sided with police in even the most ridiculous of cases. This has systematically, via incremental encroachments, created an effective environment of simply zero accountability and needs to be fixed yesterday. I do think the Stanford Prison Experiment (which would not be legal to reproduce today) tells us quite a bit as well. The simple reason is: Were no longer seen as sovereign citizens, but as prisoners who need guards. Weve arrived as peasants in our own lands http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_prison_experiment I am also in favor of a law that FORBIDS granting favoritism to former soldiers when hiring police. That seems like such a no-brainer to me, but they twist it around to make it seem like youre somehow hating on our troops. No. I simply recognize that civilian police learn habits and reflexes which are inappropriate in wartime soldiery. And wartime soldiery learn habits and reflexes which are also inappropriate in civilian policing. I would go so far as to make them mutually exclusive entirely, through an attrition system. My previous post is awaiting moderation probably because of the link I put in about the Stanford Prison Experiment. I think it says quite a lot about whats going on with our police. And their unions have basically effectively lobbied to allow police to treat citizens as equipment to be ignored and abandoned at the slightest sign of possible trouble. Theyre shooting dogs as a matter of POLICY, because nobody wants to stand up to the police unions and say this is unacceptable. I know about the Stanford Prison experiment. Id also come to recognise the exact same flaw in people before I read about it. I was an outcaste at school and from my outsiders position was able to see that most of the kids picking on me, were just following the chosen leaders ad as such they were going along to get along. Having no option from an early age but to stand on my own and set my own standards, I could see how the majority could as easily have been friends with me if they had not abrogated responsibility for their social behaviour for the sake of being with the in crowd. Cops are not the most independent thinkers, they will invariably be the least imaginative, the least courageous about confronting popular beliefs and the most inclined to go along to get along. I think youre onto something with the police and military being mutually exclusive roles. It is the exact opposite of the assumption the system makes, but thats because they are not looking for the same things in police, as we the public are. The scum at the top see nothing but similarities in Police and Soldiering. Both are stupid dumb animals whose purpose is to fulfil policy of their corrupted leadership.. Sad, but needs to happen until the sheep wake up to what is going on around them in the freest nation on earth. Yep.come 4th of July, all the sheep will be waving their flags and lining up for parades to celebrate their freedom. Man.its just sickening that the majority cant see this for what it is. It always comes as a surprise to one of the sheeple when the jackals take a bite out of their butts. Hadnt seen you around, John. Welcome back. So true, but it needs to happen The liberal morons only ever change their minds WHEN IT FINALLY HAPPENS TO THEM OR SOMEONE THEY CARE ABOUT! Yes, the liberals are the ones defending the police Yes because conservatives are always right and they never would mistake the police for true servants of society. Yep, Police are SCUMBAGS! If this policy is allowed to persist respect and trust of the police will be destroyed. Then it is just a matter of time until the police will have become our enemy rather than our defenders. Will be? That horse long since bolted mate. Even in Oz the cops are seen as the enemy by most people and our cops are gentlemen and scholars next to yours. The sheeple deserve the government they have. That includes the strong arm tactics of their enforcers. Change the names in the story from government to Mafia, from officer to capo. If you see a difference between the two, you are still a Carston Vogel. Why do the people deserve it? There are always these macho idiots who say with such bravado that the people deserve the crap they get from government. I suspect it makes them feel special, as if they alone have a handle on the true situation. What these morons dont get though, is that they are no different from the rest of the public as far as LEOs are concerned, and therefore just as likely to get their head kicked in by them. In my opinion, morons like Jeff Pearce Sr are the ones who actually truly deserve such treatment from LEOs because of their crappy attitude towards other people being abused by LEOs. I hope he gets to be on the receiving end of it in the near future. Youre mostly correct but I think theres another angle. I for one often say what he has, and I believe it. People DO get the governments they deserve. In the West mainly by inaction and lack of interest, because even if people are misled by government and media (they are) it is still possible to find the truth these days and to recognise it. There is no excuse for ignorance, except laziness and that is no excuse, it become the means by which we earn what we get. Some of us may have been battling the ignorance and blindness of our fellow citizens for years and our own lives also may reflect that different outlook such that we cannot in any way be held accountable for what has happened regarding the slippage of freedom and true democracy. It is an expression of frustration with the inertia of the public more than a personal statement of bravado. So Jo Brown is a vindictive individual. Nice Jo Brown. Anger much? Is it law enforcements job to kick heads in? According to wanna be dictator Jo Brown, yes, indeed. Dont say anything that Dictator, er,, Jo Brown doesnt agree with. He will likely send in his enforcers to kick your head in. In the authoritarian state of Jo Brown your opinion is deserving of having your head kicked in. Anger needing of release Mr Jo Brown. Perhaps a welfare check on your spouse Mr. Jo prone to violence Jo Brown. Not my words. Your prediliction towards violence toward those you disagree with is palatable. YOU SAID SO. READ YOUR OWN WORDS. With great anticipation, waiting to read some more of you exposing your latent animus and tendencies towards violence. Of course, I risk being shot, beat, head kicked in for speaking against Dear Leader Jo Brown. Dear Leader? Yes!! Your obvious inclination towards violence toward someone whoms WORDS alone causes you to desire violence towards that individual is palatable. Hmmmm. Trying to think..kinda sounds like a muslims excuse for violence against those whose WORDS they disagree with. Waiting for some more illuminating dialogue. Fascinating. Hahahaha! Can dish it, but cant take it, aye? Youd do well to read my reply. You were almost there but you miss the point when you presume to know the motives of people who say as Jeff did. There is where your entire argument collapses. I didnt read any desire on Jeffs part for anybody to be harmed by anybody. He merely pointed out the well known and oft repeated idea that people get the governments they deserve. The point which is being made, is that it is up to us the people to change things if were not happy. Muslims cannot commit violence against someone they do not agree with. The actions and words of Wahhabis and Takfiris represent the corrupted 1% of Islam and the same segment which owes its existence to the Rothschild Banking Dynasty. The wealth and authority of the Saudis is entirely reliant upon US and Israeli patronage and if they didnt have that the Muslims of the world would have gotten rid of those vile hateful rats a long time ago. The Saudis are in fact Jewish converts to Donmeh which isnt real Islam but better described as Satanism. Yet these mongrels are presented as the face of Islam and the lying Zionist Western media carries the water for the lying corrupted governments as they spread propaganda and lies against Islam in a clear cut and transparent attempt to start a war between East and West. The eventual aim is to destroy Islam from within, because the Zionist/Satanic monster which has world domination within its grasp, knows that its only true adversary is Islam. Islam has aspects which are the antidote to Jewish suprematism and that includes the ban on Riba (interest) as well as the inflexible moral code which renders attempts to pervert and corrupt the society (as we have in the West) ineffective. Believe what you want but if you persist in merely repeating false propaganda on behalf of the same war pigs you no doubt loathe and oppose in your heart, then you are just the flip side of the coin to those vile idiots of ISIS who despite their supposed beliefs are in fact puppets of Washington and Zionism and being used to hurt all Muslims and Islam especially. Whether youre a Western bigot buying into the nonsense which your own honest research could easily debunk, or a half baked Muslim Jihadi whose experience of Islam is mostly just exposure to extremist imams and even Western lies, both groups are in fact working towards the same ends and for the same people and both groups serve the devil. Be real, folks. As soon as the judge sees the name Vogel, he will realize hes a member of a protected species and will let it go. There is a double standard of justice in this country. Some pigs are more equal than other pigs. If you live in NY move! this place is a total police state as are most cites.. live in the a rural area where the cops do not revenue. At this point its a life and death decision. should of slit the pigs throat Before or after the pig shot him? If before then the cop was justified and if after, then your concept of death is different from mine. the dude was not shot in this instance, but cop needs his throat slit just because he is a thug Crikey youre right. Sorry mate I was confused after reading another story of cops shooting a guy and his dog after he called them because his wife had been stabbed. I superimposed the one over the other by the time I got this far. I do agree completely that the cop deserves nothing less than execution and I am of the opinion that things have gone far enough that all cops should be fearing for their lives for real. You dont decide not to go to war against an enemy state just because some of the people in it are not your enemies. There may be a few goods cops and a lot even who are not actively bad in their own right, but they are in the wrong team now that war needs to be declared. No worries mate, I read that other story also , sad we just have to let everyone know we are paying attention and will win sooner then later. Be safe If Vogel just rides this one out with no help, that little knife will cost NY a million for jail time. The city could send Vogel to college for the cost of this useless arrest. My friend who is a suburban cop told me once that there are so many motor vehicle laws they could find a violation on every single person driving if they want to. Why doesnt anyone ever run on getting rid of nonsense laws such as where its illegal to have ice cream in your back pocket (I read this somewhere)? But just like other areas theyll keep passing laws while ignoring the current laws that dont work either. Easy question. Most politicians are lawyers. You know what makes lawyers anything except the most useless eaters on earth? LAWS. I was a cop when I was young and we were not after people for nothing. In the south, we dont care about your pocket knife. Carry one you feel comfortable with. You can even wear a gun in a holster (if you are not a felon). Northern cities are really police states; (and they always portray the Southern cops as bullies). That is wrong. I see police shows and see the way people are treated and the little crap the cops look for in the north and I have to laugh. Dont talk about the South. We are not that petty. Sure, you never kill people or dogs or rape and steal from the public, thats only the Northern cops. everyone thinks they are free, until they come up against the machine. then they find out the truth. i had $12,000 and my truck taken away from me after a traffic stop. they got around 4th amendment and searched my vehicle by lying and saying canine had indicated presence of contraband. dog indicated nothing, did nothing. no contraband found, no laws broken, but they took my property anyway. they were pissed (and i mean pissed!) that i had refused to allow them to search, so they showed me. land of the free? hahaha thats hilarious. and yes, virginia, ALL cops are bad. 