19-Year-Old Develops Robot Lawyer That Dismisses Your Unjust Parking TicketsBy Vic Bishop DoNotPay uses a simple chat-based interface to guide users through a range of basic questions to establish if an appeal on their parking ticket is possible.These include queries on whether there were any visible parking signs at the location where the ticket was given.The AI lawyer then guides the user through the lengthy appeals process. [Source] Receiving too many parking fines near his home, and discovering that most could be dismissed through the appeals process,Joshua Browder was motivated to act, and createdthe artificial intelligence service that became an instant hit.The service is now free and easy for anybody to use, providing public legal advice that not only helps people to avoid paying excessive parking fines, but also to avoid having to hire expensive law firms to represent them in such relatively simple legal matters. I felt bad, because I knew that these drivers would be forced to go to exploitative law firms to get their issues resolved.To solve this problem, I realised that the best way to help people would be to create a computer program that could talk to users, generate appeals and answer questions like a human. I decided to create the UKs first robot lawyer for consumers.Joshua Browder Browder, a Stanford University student of economics and computer science, has already turned down offers to buy him out; and now that the service is operatingin London and New York City, he plans to open a DoNotPay site for the city of Seattle next. Donotpay was originally built to appeal parking fines, allowing motorists to pick one of 12 reasons of defence, then enter the relevant details and send a custom-generated appeal created by the websites algorithm to the council in question. With a success rate of 40 per cent, based on an average parking penalty of 60, Joshua has helped thousands of drivers save a total of more than 2million in parking fines. He then it expanded it to help with other compensation battles. [Source] Revenue generation has sadly become a key priorityfor law enforcement agencies, and the reality is that government is frequently caughtbreaking their own laws in order to suck as much money as possible from the tax cattle. Browdersviews on exploitative policing are quite mature for someone of his demographic, and rather easy to comprehend for the public, especially to those who are familiar with the changing current of policing in the West, where departments now place greater emphasis on making money rather than ensuring public safety. I think the people getting parking tickets are the most vulnerable in society. These people arent looking to break the law. I think theyre being exploited as a revenue source by the local government. [Source] What do you think about ideas like this? Are we seeing the evolution of revolution, where ingenious young entrepreneurs take on state corruption by making common sense solutions easy and affordable for the public? How much longer will the state permit the existence of services like these which directly threaten the rich revenue streams of corporatized, for-profit government? Read more articles from Vic Bishop. Vic Bishopis a staff writer for WakingTimes.com and OffgridOutpost.com Survival Tips blog. He is an observer of people, animals, nature, and he loves to ponder the connection and relationship between them all. A believer in always striving tobecoming self-sufficient and free from the matrix, please track him down on Facebook. Like Waking Times on Facebook. Follow Waking Times on Twitter. This article (19-Year-Old Develops Robot Lawyer that Dismisses Your Unjust Parking Tickets)was originally created and published by Waking Times and is published here under a Creative Commonslicense with attribution toVic Bishopand WakingTimes.com. It may be re-posted freely with proper attribution, author bio, and this copyright statement. Please contact WakingTimes@gmail.com for more info. Pulling Not The The Another After Any Yet So One Thanks for the info. It all starts by exposing the courts and prosecutors have no personal jurisdiction without our consent. Search for Anna Von Reitz, see also on YouTube CopWatch Hawaii, Marc Stevens, JeHeretic Aye, but heres the rub! Anna, et al, do NOT like to admit to the correctness of my logical analyses any more than the lieyers, because they all have an AGENDA!! And that agenda is to make profits by selling people something! For the lieyers, they are selling you strategies which may or may not work for you. Anna and others are all trying to sell you something too! But as for me, I GIVE my work away 100% for FREEEEE!!! See the difference there? I am handing out red pills to escape The Matrix, whereas all of the others are merely selling you maps on how they think you should navigate through it! WHY should you continue living in The Matrix when you can escape from it? Cant wait to see this concept applied to other legal and law enforcement scams. Bet the lawyers thought their jobs were safe from AI too! Thank you I knew my faith in our generation of young adults was not misplaced. 