Harvard and Human Rights Watch Call For A Ban On Killer Robots Amid Geneva TalksBy Joseph Jankowski Machines have long served as instruments of war, but historically humans have directed how they are used, senior arms division researcher at Human Rights Watch, Bonnie Docherty, said in a statement. Now there is a real threat that humans would relinquish their control and delegate life-and-death decisions to machines. The reportsuggests that states should adoptan international, legally binding instrument that prohibits the development, production, and use of fully autonomous weapons. It also calls for national laws or policies that establish similar prohibitions on fully autonomous weapons. A requirement to maintain human control over the use of weapons would eliminate many of the problems associated with fully autonomous weapons, states the report. Such a requirement would protect the dignity of human life, facilitate compliance with international humanitarian and human rights law, and promote accountability for unlawful acts. This week, memberstates of the United Nations are meeting in Geneva to discuss the legality of lethal autonomous weapons. The talks are focused on understanding and controlling the way artificial intelligence technology is improving, and the implications that could have for weapons like Predator and Reaper drones. It means that humans are deprived from moral responsibility, Winfield addressed those meeting at Davos in January. When you put a robot in a chaotic environment, it behaves chaotically. Roger Carr, chairman of the British aerospace and defense group BAE, also believes autonomous killer robots pose a great danger to humans. If you remove ethics and judgment and morality from human endeavor whether it is in peace or war, you will take humanity to another level which is beyond our comprehension, Carr warned at Davos.You equally cannot put something into the field that, if it malfunctions, can be very destructive with no control mechanism from a human. That is why the umbilical link, man to machine, is not only to decide when to deploy the weapon but it is also the ability to stop the process. Both are equally important. Just to get a glance into wherelethal autonomous weapons currently stand,lets take a look at the robotic war balls being developed by the Marines. From Defense One: A research team from Stamford, Conn. has developed an amphibious drone that they are currently testing with the Marines. The GuardBot is a robot ball that swims over water at about 4 miles per hour and then rolls along the beach, at as much as a 30-degree incline and 20 miles perhour. It uses a nine-axis stabilization, pendulum motion propulsion system, which moves the bot forward by shifting the center of gravity back and forth and a variety of steeringalgorithms. It took creator Peter Muhlrad some seven years to develop, but now that its complete Muhlrad says it can be rapidly produced in various sizes. Company documents suggest it can be scaled down to units as small as 10 cm and as large as nine feet. The company is planning to developa prototype thats 6 feet indiameter. Muhlrads company, GuardBot Inc. has a cooperative research development agreement, or CRADA, with the Navy. A CRADAis a legal framework that allows private companies or researchers to use government facilities, research and resources to build things that are mutually beneficial to both parties. The information that the researcher discovers is protected for up to five years. Under many CRADAs the researcher does not receive money from the government but has the right to commercialize what he or she produces. The government retains a uselicense. According to Peter Muhlad,the GuardBot could carry explosives. Also read: 