Self-Sufficiency: A Local Solution to a Global ProblemReposted edited for new site: Alternative Thai News Network (ATNN).For an extreme in-depth look at Thailands Sufficiency Economy and New Theory economics, please see, Wisdom from the Orient: Self-Sufficiency. Link in Thai HERE When thinking about solutions many are quick to cite organizing a protest and taking to the streets. Lets for a moment consider the mechanics of a protest, what it might accomplish, and what it may leave to be desired. Take Glenn Becks disingenuous 2010 Restoring Honor event in Washington D.C. It drew thousands of honest, well-intentioned people from all over the United States. Indeed, thousands of people filled up their Fortune 500 made cars with gas from Fortune 500 oil companies, drove countless miles, stopping along the way at Fortune 500 fast food restaurants, stayed at Fortune 500 run hotels, and stocked up on supplies purchased at Fortune 500 Walmart. They slaked their thirst under the hot August sun with cans of Fortune 500 Pepsi and Coke, and at the end of the day, they drove home, paid their Fortune 500 cable subscriptions to watch their Fortune 500 media reports, most likely on News Corporations Fox News, a Council on Foreign Relations corporate member. At best, all a protest will lead to, while we are so hopelessly dependent on this system, is a round of musical chairs inside the political arena, with perhaps superficial concessions made to the people. The vector sum, however, will still be decidedly in favor of the global corporate-financier oligarchy. If we understand that the fundamental problem facing not only America, but the entire world, is a global corporate-financier oligarchy that has criminally consolidated their wealth by liberalizing their own activities while strangling ours through regulations, taxes, and laws, we should then understand why events like Becks Restoring Honor are not only fruitless, but in fact, counterproductive. We should also realize that any activity we commit ourselves to must be directed at this corporate-financier oligarchy rather than the governments they have co-opted and positioned as buffers between themselves and the masses. Understanding Globalization As of late, the expansion of this global oligarchical empire has taken a more extreme, perhaps desperate form involving staged revolutions as seen in Egypt and Tunisia, and in Libyas case, armed rebellion and foreign military intervention. However, worldwide coups detat have occurred before for example, in the late 1990s under the guise of a financial collapse and IMF restructuring. Many nations fell beholden to the IMF and its regiment of reforms which amounted to neo-colonialism packaged under the euphemism of economic liberalization. To illustrate how this works, it may help to understand what real colonialism looked like. 1. Siam granted extraterritoriality to British subjects. A more contemporary example for comparison would be the outright military conquest of Iraq and Paul Bremers (CFR) economic reformation. The Economist gleefully enumerates the neo-colonial economic liberalization of Iraq in a piece titled Lets all go to the yard sale: If it all works out, Iraq will be a capitalists dream: 1. 100% ownership of Iraqi assets. Read more: Egypt Today, Thailand Tomorrow And few could argue that the IMFs rehabilitation regiments being forced upon nations all over the world after the late 90s financial crash are any different than economic colonialism both past and present. In fact, the IMF itself publishes reports at great length concerning the necessity of economic liberalization. To be sure, the governments that come to power in the wake of the current Middle East destabilizations will be more servile and will undoubtedly be committed to similar economic liberalization. Brookings Institutions Kenneth Pollack already made it quite clear that: Siam eventually rolled back the terms of the 1855 Bowring Treaty as the British Empire waned, but as of 1997, Thailand was once again faced with similar terms, dictated this time by the bankers of the IMF. Thailands Answer to Globalization Thailands answer to the IMF, and globalization in general was profound in both implications as well as in its understanding of globalizations end game. Fiercely independent and nationalistic, and being the only nation in Southeast Asia to avoid colonization, Thailands sovereignty has been protected for over 800 years by its revered monarchy. The current dynasty, the House of Chakri, has reigned nearly as long as America has existed as a nation and the current king is regarded as the equivalent of a living Founding Father. And just as it has for 800 years, the Thai Monarchy today provides the most provocative and meaningful answer to the threats facing the Kingdom. The answer of course is self-sufficiency. Self-sufficiency as a nation, as a province, as a community and as a household. This concept is enshrined in the Thai Kings New Theory or self-sufficiency economy and mirrors similar efforts found throughout the world to break the back of the oppression and exploitation that results from dependence on an interdependent globalized system. By moving to the city, people give up private property, cease pursuing productive occupations, and end up being folded into a consumerist paradigm. Within such a paradigm, problems like overpopulation, pollution, crime, and economic crises can only be handled by a centralized government and generally yield political solutions such as quotas, taxes, micromanagement, and regulations rather than meaningful technical solutions. Also, such problems inevitably lead to a centralized government increasing its own power, always at the expense of the people and their freedom. The effects of economic catastrophe are also greater in a centralized, interdependent society, where everyone is subject to the overall health of the economy for even simple necessities like food, water, and electricity. The West Strikes Back Of course the head-of-state of a nation almost 70 million strong promoting a lifestyle that cuts the legs out from under the Western corporate-financier agenda does not sit well with the oligarchical establishment. Their response to this, as it has been with all of Thailands habitual displays of defiance is something to behold. Perhaps the most vocal Western corporate-financier critic of Thailand is the Economist. It openly criticizes the Kings self-sufficiency economy in an article titled Rebranding Thaksinomics. It states that the economic plan is a partial retreat from Thailands hitherto liberal economic stance. The Economist muddles the debate by side-stepping the self-sufficient aspects of theself-sufficiency economy. It claims that socialist handouts under deposed Prime Minister and documented Western proxy Thaksin Shinawatra somehow accomplished the exact same goals. The Economist also claims the concept of self-sufficiency is merely a rebranding of such socialist handouts. The Economist article then breaks down into a pro-Thaksin rant, decrying his ousting from power and continued claims that somehow encouraging people to grow their own food is a theft of Thaksins socialist/populist policies. It should be noted that permanent socialism is not self-sufficiency. It is complete dependency on the state and on people who pay their ever increasing taxes. Socialism is not about growing your own garden, using technology to enhance your independence or solving your problems with your own resources. It is about taking from the collective storehouses of the state, and when you are again hungry, taking again. Socialism could only be very useful as a stop-gap measure between current problems and the active pursuit of permanent technical solutions. However, the goal of globalization is to create interdependency between states, and total dependency on global institutions, therefore, perpetuating problems, not solving them becomes the equation. Another Western pro-corporate-financier point-of-view comes from Australias National Universitys New Mandala blog written by academic wonk Andrew Walker. The blog itself is a clearinghouse for corporate subsidized talking points regarding Southeast Asia and is tied to the corporate-financier funded Lowy Institute. Some contributing writers even include Thaksin Shinawatras hired lobbyist, Robert Amsterdam. Walkers entire perception of Thailand seems to be derived from his time spent in a single village in Northern Thailand. From his myopic point-of-view in the minute village of Baan Tian, he condemns entirely Thailands self-sufficiency economy in his article Royal misrepresentation of rural livelihoods. He suggests that the sufficiency economy prescriptions for rural development are inappropriate and disempowering. As with the Economist, the article breaks down into a pro-Thaksin rant claiming the entire plan is meant to keep the rural population of Thailand in their place, out of the cities, and thus out of the debate of national issues. Of course, becoming self-sufficient is one step on the road to real empowerment. Academic wonks like Andrew Walker presume the height of empowerment is feeding a paper voting stub into a box, on your way home from a service sector job, and then relaxing behind the glow of a new plasma screen TV bought on credit. A more likely argument would be that sustaining your own existence, wrought from the land beneath your feet, and the ability to shape the world around you with an understanding of science and the mastery of multiple trades is the height of empowerment and the truest form of human freedom. The hand wringing within the writings of the Economist and ANUs Andrew Walker is not the full extent of the Wests reaction to Thailand and its wandering from foreign dominion. A full fledged red color revolution has been brewing within the Kingdom since at least 2009. Reading the Red Siam Manifesto penned by red shirt intelligentsia Giles Ungpakorn makes it quite clear how they view self-sufficiency and the need to reform Thailand as a socialist welfare state. Ungpakorns childish and ranting manifesto can be found on Socialist Worker Online here. A complete selection of the red shirt propaganda used within Thailand can be found here. It should be noted that the leader of the red shirt protest is deposed ex-PM Thaksin Shinawatra. Long before Thaksin Shinwatra would become prime minister in Thailand, he was already working his way up the Wall Street-London ladder of opportunity, while simultaneously working his way up in Thai politics. He was appointed by the Carlyle Group as an adviser, while holding public office, and attempted to use his connections to boost his political image. Thanong Khanthong of Thailands English newspaper the Nation, wrote in 2001: Upon becoming prime minister in 2001, Thaksin would begin paying back the support he received from his Western sponsors. In 2003, he would commit Thai troops to the US invasion of Iraq, despite widespread protests from both the Thai military and the public. Thaksin would also allow the CIA to use Thailand for its abhorrent rendition program. In 2004, Thaksin attempted to ramrod through a US-Thailand Free-Trade Agreement (FTA) without parliamentary approval, backed by the US-ASEAN Business Council who just before last years 2011elections that saw Thaksins sister Yingluck Shinawatra brought into power, hosted the leaders of Thaksins red shirt personality cult. Since the 2006 coup that toppled his regime, Thaksin has been represented by US corporate-financier elites via their lobbying firms including, Kenneth Adelman of the Edelman PR firm (Freedom House, International Crisis Group, PNAC), James Baker of Baker Botts (CFR), Robert Blackwill of Barbour Griffith Rogers (CFR), Kobre Kim, and currently Robert Amsterdam of Amsterdam Peroff (Chatham House). To say that Thaksin Shinawatra and his red shirts have foreign backing would be a profound understatement. Thaksins proxy political party maintains the red shirt mobs which in turn are supported by several NGOs including the National Endowment for Democracy funded Prachatai, an independent media organization that coordinates the red shirt propaganda efforts. Prachatai was recently nominated for the Deutsche Welle Blog Awards by the Neo-Con infested Freedom House, upon which former Thaksin lobbyist Kenneth Adelman sits as a member on the board of directors. The key to stopping these foreign interests dead in their tracks is seizing back from them the mechanisms of civilization and we have done that already in terms of the alternative media. Such success is necessary in all aspects of our life, and as the King in Thailand suggests, it can start with something as simple as growing your own garden. Today and Into the Future Of course in Thailand, agricultural self-sufficiency is coupled with technology to enhance efficiency and improve the quality of life. Even in the city, small independent businesses are adopting the latest technology to improve their production, increase their profits, and even out-compete larger corporations. Computer controlled machining equipment can be found in small workshops crammed into old shop-houses, automatic embroidering machines allow a single woman to fulfill orders for name tags on new school uniforms rather than both businesses sending off orders to factories owned by a handful of wealthy investors. A multitude of examples can be seen walking around any city block in Thailands capital of Bangkok. This indeed not only encapsulates Dr. Gershenfelds dilemma, but describes to a t the mentality of oligarchs and the fears they harbor about empowering the people, a fear reflected in the organizational boundaries of their corporations and governmental institutions. This is a feature of oligarchy described as early as 300 B.C. in ancient Greece in The Athenian Constitution. In it, a character referred to as the Old Oligarch describes his contempt for the social mobility the technology of the Athenian navy affords the lower echelons of Athenian society. Dr. Gershenfeld goes on to encapsulate the true potential of his Fab Labs by stating, the other 5 billion people on the planet arent just technical sinks, they are sources. The real opportunity is to harness the inventive power of the world to locally design and produce solutions to local problems. Dr. Gershenfeld concludes by conceding he thought such a possibility was 20 years off, but its where we are today, noting the success his Fab Labs are already having around the world. Self-sufficiency and the harnessing of technology in the hands of the people are the greatest fears of the corporate-financier oligarchy fears that oligarchs throughout the centuries have harbored. Simply boycotting multinational corporations and replacing them with local solutions is something everyone can afford to do starting today. And by simply looking into Dr. Neil Gershenfelds Fab Lab, similar ideas such as hackerspaces, raising awareness of the personal fabrication revolution, and even in the smallest way participating can help overcome the obstacle of social-engineering and spur a profound paradigm shift. We have begun to seize back the media, now it is time to seize back the other levers of power. Now is the time to recognize true freedom as being self-sufficient as a nation, as a community, and as a household, and start living it everyday. RELATED ACTIVIST POST ARTICLES: Tony Cartaluccis articles have appeared on many alternative media websites, including his own at Land Destroyer Report. Read other contributed articles by Tony Cartalucci here. 