Rand Paul introduces bill to extend Fourth Amendment protection to electronic communicationsMadison Ruppert This comes after it was revealed that both the IRS and the FBI claimed they did not need a warrant to spy on the electronic communications of Americans. However, some might be skeptical given Pauls much-criticized apparent flip-flop on the drone issue. Nonetheless, Paul has made some much needed statements about the lack of protection given to the private electronic communications of the American people. In todays high-tech world, we must ensure that all forms of communication are protected, Paul said in a press release. Yet government has eroded protecting the Fourth Amendment over the past few decades, especially when applied to electronic communications and third party providers. The Fourth Amendment is supposed to protect the American people from unreasonable search and seizure, though that has been undermined quite a bit. The Fourth Amendment usually requires warrants to be issued based on probable cause, but that too has been increasingly eroded under the guise of fighting terrorism. Congress has passed a variety of laws that decimate our Fourth Amendment protections, Paul said. In effect, it means that Americans can only count on Fourth Amendment protections if they dont use email, cellphones, the Internet, credit cards, libraries, banks or other forms of modern finance and communications. Basic constitutional rights should not be invalidated by carrying out basic, day-to-day functions in a technologically advanced world, and this bill will provide much needed clarity and reassert Fourth Amendment protections for records held by third parties, he said. As WebProNews points out, Pauls legislation was introduced only a month after the Electronic Communications Privacy Act Amendments Act of 2013, introduced Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), was approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee. Unlike Leahys bill, however, Pauls bill would ensure all online data held by third parties is protected by the Fourth Amendment, according to Zach Walton of WebProNews. This type of reform seems to be gaining steam, with Attorney General Eric Holder even supporting an update of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, as the Electronic Frontier Foundation noted on Thursday. On Wednesday, Paul also introduced the Preserving Freedom from Unwarranted Surveillance Act of 2013, a bill that aims to protect an individuals right to privacy against unwarranted governmental intrusion through the use of unmanned aerial vehicles, commonly known as drones. Such legislation seems to be increasingly palatable in Washington, at least to a degree, and has gained traction in state legislatures around the nation. It will be interesting to see how these bills fare in a climate that remains hostile to limiting government power. Id love to hear your opinion, take a look at your story tips and even your original writing if you would like to get it published. Please email me at Admin@EndtheLie.com Please support our work and help us start to pay contributors by doing your shopping through our Amazon link or check out some must-have products at our store. This article first appeared at End the Lie. Madison Ruppert is the Editor and Owner-Operator of the alternative news and analysis databaseEnd The Lie and has no affiliation with any NGO, political party, economic school, or other organization/cause. He is available for podcast and radio interviews. Madison also now has his own radio show on UCYTV Monday nights 7 PM 9 PM PT/10 PM 12 AM ET. Show page link here: http://UCY.TV/EndtheLie. If you have questions, comments, or corrections feel free to contact him at admin@EndtheLie.com linkwithin_text=Related Articles: 