Unelected Regime Begins Killing Spree in Eastern UkraineTony Cartalucci The Western media continues to refer to those opposing the unelected regime in Kiev as pro-Russian, and continues to insist that the uprising in the east is either backed by Moscow or in fact, being carried out directly by Russians operating in Ukrainian territory. However, the US and EU have failed categorically to prove such claims with evidence, and have since been caught circulating falsified images and news in attempts to bolster their claims. The current regime in Kiev came to power at the height of the so-called Euromaidan protests where admittedly armed Neo-Nazi militants seized power, ransacking the headquarters of their political opponents and driving out the elected government of President Viktor Yanukovych. While the armed, violent seizure of power was initially covered up by the Western media, the BBC itself would later admit in a short video report thatindeed armed Neo-Nazi militants spearheaded the coup. The nature of the regime in Kiev is also being papered over by the Western media, covering up the fact that the two main opposition parties that seized power, Svoboda and Fatherland, are in fact led by a collection of Neo-Nazis, bigots, racists, and anti-Semites. In a desperate attempt to cover up this lack of legitimacy, the West has sent many high level officials including a leading US Senator and the US Vice President to Kiev to lend both political and material support. The use of fanatical, irregular forces, armored vehicles, and aircraft including warplanes and helicopter gunships, signifies an escalation of violence by Kiev against its own people through the use of clearly disproportionate force aimed at terrorizing the population. That the United States and European Union have spent the past 3 years engaged in what they called the responsibility to protect in both Libya and Syria, and are now backing a regime that is arraying military forces against its own people, marks a new low in both the impartial application of international law and the perceived legitimacy of the Western nations now increasingly involved in Ukraines political crisis. Wests Hypocrisy: Libya vs. Ukraine Of course, years before the Arab Spring in 2011, regime change in Libya was a long-standing geopolitical goal of the West. The charges President Obama made in his speech regarding the situation in Libya were based on intentionally falsified evidence exposed by the very so-called human rights organization who fabricated them. Worse yet, those innocent people President Obama cited in his 2011 speech were later confirmed to be heavily armed militants from the US State Department designated terrorist organization, the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) Al Qaedas Libyan franchise who would later, with NATO backing, travel to fight in Syria as well. As heavy weapons are now being turned against the Ukrainian people by the unelected regime in Kiev led by literal Neo-Nazis, bigots, racists, and anti-Semites the US and EU through NATO have signaled their full unflinching support for Kiev, going as far as offering weapons, training, and the backing by NATO troops of Kievs so-called anti-terror operations now unfolding tentatively in eastern Ukraine. NATO troops have been deployed to nearby Poland while naval forces have been shifting into the Black and Baltic seas, all an attempt to pressure Russia. Paradoxically, NATO is helping Kiev do in reality what it falsely accused Libya of doing in 2011 before applying sanctions, a no-fly zone, and eventually full spectrum bombardment of Libya while it armed and funded proxy militant forces on the ground to overthrow the government. NATOs overt contradiction undermines its perceived authority and endangers further its already strained legitimacy. As NATOs failure and deceit continues to come to light in Libya, Syria, and Afghanistan, its ability to project its power and execute its agenda across Eastern Europe is becoming increasingly tenuous. By pursing an already unpopular conflict in Ukraine, NATO and its individual member nations are only further diminishing their international influence ensuring failure elsewhere and the further acceleration of an apparent, irreversible decline across the West. The West Has Already Lost in Ukraine What is left for the West is to perpetually destabilize Ukraine, denying Russia a stable and beneficial relationship with its neighbor. However, this strategy hinges on keeping a useful and obedient regime in power in Kiev a feat likewise unlikely if not impossible. The regime is sitting on a seat of power still warm after the departure of President Yanukovych, who despite being ousted from power, is playing a continuing role in countering the new regimes occupation of the Ukrainian capital. Additionally, the abhorrent nature of the new regime is exposed through its daily actions and as an increasingly astute global public dig into its past. This, coupled with a looming economic catastrophe that will be compounded by the regimes very willing cooperation and capitation to IMF-proposed austerity measures, will ensure whatever little support it does have will quickly melt away. Many see NATO and their client regime in Kievs actions in eastern Ukraine and along Russias borders elsewhere as an attempt to provoke Moscow into acting first justifying a wider conflict. For Russia and the anti-fascists in eastern and southern Ukraine, patience to weather these provocations will eventually lead to the self-inflicted collapse of the regime in Kiev, and a reunited Ukraine standing stronger still with its eastern neighbors. Tony Cartalucci, Bangkok-based geopolitical researcher and writer, especially for the online magazine New Eastern Outlook. where this first appeared. 