Wests Syrian Narrative Based on Guy in British ApartmentTony Cartalucci, Contributor Of course, beyond this single article, Reuters and its fellow news agencies are sure to never again remind readers of these facts. The opportunity for impropriety seems almost inevitable for a man who openly reviles a government long targeted for regime change by the very country he currently resides in, and whos method of reportage involves dubious phone-calls impossible for anyone to verify. Clearly for real journalists,Abdulrahman is a useless, utterly compromised source of information who has every reason to twist reality to suit his admittedly politically-motivated agenda of overthrowing the Syrian government. However, for a propagandist, he is a goldmine. That is why despite the overt conflicts of interest, the lack of credibility, the obvious disadvantage of being nearly 3,000 miles away from the alleged subject of his observations, or the fact that a single man is ludicrously calling himself a Syrian Observatory for Human Rights in the first place, the Western media still eagerly laps up his constant torrent of disinformation. And when the Western press cites such a dubious, compromised character, it means that the actual evidence inevitably trickling out of Syria contradicts entirely the Wests desired narrative; so profoundly, in fact, that they must contrive the summation of their evidence from whole cloth with tailors like Abdelrahman. And while the general public should indeed be angry over being deceived on such a vast scale, they should be utterly outraged that the establishment thinks they are so stupid that theyd believe any evidence coming from an opposition activist, disingenuously masquerading as a reputable organization, telling us all what is happening in Syria via phone-calls received in his plush apartment in England. linkwithin_text=Related Articles: 