The Worrying Trend of Internet ShutdownsJillian C. York Prior to January 2011, national or regional Internet blackouts were mostly unheard of. Although the Maldives,Nepal, Burma, and China all preceded Egypt with this innovation, it was the shutdown initiated by former Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak that set a new precedent and garnered global media coverage. Since then, Syria, Libya, and even San Franciscos BART police have pulled a Mubarak. But in 2013, Internet blackouts became de rigeur for embattled governments. In August,Burma experienced a week of disruptions, the cause of which remains unclear. In Egypts North Sinai region, telephone and Internet networks wereaccording to a report from Mada Masrintermittently shut down in September in the midst of military operations targeting militants there. In Sudan, where a brutal government crackdown in September on protests over fuel subsidy cuts resulted in the deaths of more than 30 people, authorities cut off Internet accessin an apparent bid to stop the demonstrations. In October, Renesys reported that the Iraqi government had tried but failed to shut down the Internet. And more recently, Renesys spotted a 45-minute national outage from North Korea, for which the source was unclear. Politically-motivated Internet outages are certainly trending. For governments, they pose an all-too-tempting way of stifling speech and keeping order during periods of protest or unrest, but as the BART telecommunications shutdown in San Francisco demonstrated, they can also prevent urgent communications from getting through and therefore may not be worth the risks they pose, even to the most despotic of regimes. This article is part of our 2013 Year in Review series; read other articles about the fight for digital rights in 2013. RELATED ACTIVIST POST ARTICLE: 