Greenpeaces Glass HouseBalzac The crew of the Arctic Sunrise, now affectionately known by the moniker The Arctic 30, are currently being held in prison in the Russian port city of Murmansk on charges of hooliganism. According to a September 26, 2013 article in the New York Times: Seizure of a Greenpeace Vessel by Russia, Kumi Naidoo, the executive director of Greenpeace International, is quoted as saying: Greenpeace Director Naidoos description of the event as reported by the New York Times only tells a small part of the story. The boarding of the oil rig which is a violation of international law was, in my opinion and no doubt the opinion of many others, well-orchestrated to function as an excuse to launch a smear campaign against a Russian regime that stands in opposition against much of the Globalist agenda. Thankfully, Russia has a low tolerance for NGO-sponsored tomfoolery, and as such has enacted stiff regulations against their proliferation throughout that country. According to the same NY Times article: Clearly the whole event was staged as a PR stunt for the purpose of allowing Greenpeace the opportunity to educate New York Timesreaders as to their version of what causes climate change and who the bad guys are, namely: The anti-national sovereignty message comes across loud and clear, as do the disingenuous claims about the causes of climate change. From what I can gather, the #1 cause of climate change worldwide is GeoEngineering. http://www.skyderalert.com/ Look Up! http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/what-the-hell-are-they-spraying-on-us/ http://www.activistpost.com/2012/08/alarmists-cover-up-GeoEngineering.html http://www.globalresearch.ca/what-are-the-causes-of-catastrophic-incidents-the-impacts-of-geo-engineering-on-climate-and-the-environment/5329489 So what does Greenpeace have to say about GeoEngineering? Surprisingly little. When even MSM organ grinders like the NY Times and the Huffington Post make the occasional report on GeoEngineering shoddy and propaganda-laden as those reports might be at least they mention it. They write articles about it. But Greenpeace, an environmentalist organization whose job you would think would be to inform the public about environmental health risks like GeoEngineering, is eerily silent about the issue. How do we know that? Well, when one does a search for GeoEngineering in the Greenpeace website, there is a grand total of one result. Hmmm In that article where the result is found, written by former Director of the original Greenpeace Foundation, Rex Weyler, there is only one passing mention of GeoEngineering in the blog post, which was written as a response to a UK Channel Four program entitled: What The Green Movement Got Wrong: Weyler protests that the Channel Four documentary is: That one passing reference to GeoEngineering not only goes unmentioned in the remainder of Weylers article, but is the only reference to GeoEngineering in the entire Greenpeace website! Furthermore, the reference does not explain what Greenpeaces position actually is on GeoEngineering, citing only what Channel Four allegedly supports. You may then think to yourself, well perhaps Greenpeace isnt semantically partial to the word GeoEngineering, surely theyll have loads to say about chemtrails Wrong again! A quick search for Chemtrails in the Greenpeace website yields not a single result. Now get this: while GeoEngineering yields only one meager search result in the Greenpeace website, Climate Denial yields a whopping 56 hits, and is chock-full of feature-length articles on its various hydra-like manifestations. Climate denial is their pet issue; their bread and butter. How about a search for Solar Radiation Management? 8 hits, but none of them about Solar Radiation Management. Instead all the articles that come up are about Fukushima and the nuclear industry. Denial, a loaded term if ever there was one, has obvious associations that are surely not lost on the reader. One does not use it loosely, and the fact that its part of the Greenpeace platform means that Greenpeace is well aware of the framing applied by making denial a cornerstone of its campaign. Wikipedia provides the following instructive breakdown of the three main types of denial: One could easily and quite fairly state that Greenpeace practices all three forms of denial when it comes to Climate Change as defined by Wikipedia: Simple Denial: by virtue of its near-total omission from its website of the terms GeoEngineering and Chemtrails, Greenpeace denies the reality of the unpleasant fact altogether. Minimization: by never actually stating that GeoEngineering and Chemtrails do not exist, but doing nothing as an environmental group to speak out and raise awareness of the issue, Greenpeace admits the fact but denies its seriousness by combining denial with rationalization. Projection: by holding up climate change as the enemy but denying its true cause, GeoEngineering, Greenpeace denies responsibility and blames somebody or something else, i.e. whichever enemies the Globalists find it most advantageous at any given moment to smear. Its no secret that those who own the international banks also own the oil companies, the media and the major political parties in the United States, Western Europe and most countries around the world. Greenpeace would have you believe that the only opposition to Global Warming/Climate Change is Fat Cat Republican Climate Deniers and the Big Oil Lobby, when in fact objection to the absurdity of the Global Warming claims increasingly comes from the grassroots. It would not then be an exaggeration to say that Greenpeace is an active participant in what amounts to a false flag psyops upon the global public. How so? Globalist-sponsored GeoEngineering causes global warming and numerous other horrifically harmful health effects upon the planet and population, but uses organizations like Greenpeace to redirect the blame, ostensibly, on Big Oil and Republican Climate Deniers, which is a false flag, when in fact the real targets of this highly sophisticated public relations campaign are: Clearly Greenpeace has been adroitly set up as controlled opposition to Globalist-funded Big Oil and Republican Climate Deniers in order to capitalize on the organizations global reach and reputation as useful cover for actual Globalist-sponsored global warming caused not by fossil fuel carbon emissions, but privately funded GeoEngineering on a global scale, which threatens the health and well-being of citizens and the sovereignty of nations. And the rabbit hole runs even deeper than that. GeoEngineering is now rather stealthily being touted in the mainstream media as a possible solution to the climate change that it itself is responsible for creating. Of course the fact that GeoEngineering has been going on for many years without public disclosure is not mentioned in any mainstream reports.(Source) For all of these reasons, Russia should be applauded by sovereign nations and concerned citizens around the world for coming down hard on the fraud that is Greenpeace and its Globalist paymasters, even if one cant help but feel sorry for the imprisoned crew of the Arctic Sunrise, who may very well have been innocent victims of their misplaced environmental impulses. If anyone should be imprisoned for causing harm to the public, its the leaders of Greenpeace, whose active participation in the GeoEngineering criminal conspiracy along with their shameless and deceitful eagerness to smear truth seekers as deniers is a high crime against humanity and should be punished accordingly. Ironically, Greenpeace seems to relish the opportunity to hurl the accusation of Climate Denier not only indiscriminately at the growing number of awakened non-believers, but in a targeted manner towards those who dont play ball according to Globalist rules. But as weve seen by their omissions as much as their actions, the ones who are really in denial about the true cause of global warming: GeoEngineering, are Greenpeace and its followers. That being the case, Greenpeace should take into consideration the inevitable blowback that comes from misleading the public in such an insidious way. Those like Greenpeace, who live in glass houses, should really not throw stones. 