The End of Private Property in the Era of the American Police StateJohn W. Whitehead How secure do our homes remain if police, armed with no warrant, can pound on doors at will and forcibly enter?Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the lone dissenter in Kentucky v. King If the government can tell you what you can and cannot do within the privacy of your home, whether it relates to what you eat, what you smoke or whom you love, you no longer have any rights whatsoever within your home. If government officials can fine and arrest you for growing vegetables in your front yard, praying with friends in your living room, installing solar panels on your roof, and raising chickens in your backyard, youre no longer the owner of your property. If school officials can punish your children for what they do or say while at home or in your care, your children are not your ownthey are the property of the state. If government agents can invade your home, break down your doors, kill your dog, damage your furnishings and terrorize your family, your property is no longer private and secureit belongs to the government. Likewise, if police can forcefully draw your blood, strip search you, and probe you intimately, your body is no longer your own, either. This is what a world without the Fourth Amendment looks like, where the lines between private and public property have been so blurred that private property is reduced to little more than something the government can use to control, manipulate and harass you to suit its own purposes, and you the homeowner and citizen have been reduced to little more than a tenant or serf in bondage to an inflexible landlord. In San Rafael, California, it is now illegal to smoke a cigarette or other tobacco product inside apartments, condos, duplexes, and multi-family houses. Although lawmakers hope the ordinance will be self-enforcing, theyre encouraging landlords to threaten tenants with eviction should they run afoul of the law. In Ohio, its illegal to alter ones car with a hidden compartment if the intent is to conceal illegal drugs. Although Norman Gurley had no drugs on his person, nor in his car, nor could it be proven that he intended to conceal drugs, he was still arrested for the crime of having a hidden compartment in the trunk of his car. In Florida and elsewhere throughout the country, home vegetable gardens are being targeted as illegal. For 17 years, Hermine Ricketts and Tom Carroll have tended the vegetable garden in their front yard, relying on it for 80 percent of their food intake, only to be told by city officials that they must get rid of it or face $50 a day in fines. The reason? The vegetable garden is inconsistent with the citys aesthetic character. In Iowa, a war veteran attempting to wean his family off expensive corporate farm products, GMOs and pesticides has been charged with violating a city ordinance and now faces up to 30 days in jail and a $600 fine for daring to raise chickens in his backyard for his personal use, despite statements of support from his neighbors. In Virginia, school officials suspended two boys for the remainder of the school year and charged them with possession of a firearm after they were reported to the police for playing with toy airsoft guns in their front yard, while waiting for the morning school bus. At no time did the boys attempt to take the toy guns on the bus or to school. The most obvious disrespect for property rights comes in the form of the tens of thousands of SWAT team raids that occur across the country on a yearly basis. Usually undertaken under the pretense of serving a drug warrant, these raids involve police arriving at a private residence in SWAT gear, armed to the hilt, kicking down doors, apprehending all persons inside the home, then determining if a crime has been committed. That was Judy Sanchezs experience when FBI agents investigating gang activity used a chainsaw to cut through her door, then forced Sanchez and her child to the ground. It was only after invading Sanchezs home and terrorizing her family that agents realized they had targeted the wrong address. Unfortunately, we in America get so focused on the Fourth Amendments requirement of a warrant before government agents can invade our property (a requirement that means little in an age of kangaroo courts and rubberstamped warrant requests) that we fail to properly appreciate the first part of the statement declaring that we have a right to be secure in our persons, houses, papers, and effects. What this means is that the Fourth Amendments protections were intended to not only follow us wherever we go but also apply to all that is ourswhether youre talking about our physical bodies, our biometric data, our possessions, our families, or our way of life. However, in an 8-1 ruling in Kentucky v. King (2011), the U.S. Supreme Court sanctioned SWAT teams smashing down doors of homes or apartments without a warrant if they happen to suspect you might be doing something illegal in your home. At a time when the government routinely cites national security as the justification for its endless violations of the Constitution, the idea that a citizen can actually be secure or protected against such government overreach seems increasingly implausible, while suggesting that a person take steps to secure his person and property against the government could have one accused of fomenting anti-government sentiment. Nevertheless, the reality of our age is this: if the government chooses to crash through our doors, listen to our phone calls, read our emails and text messages, fine us for growing vegetables in our front yard, jail us for raising chickens in our backyard, forcibly take our blood and saliva, and probe our vaginas and rectums, theres little we can do to stop them. At least, not at that particular moment. When youre face to face with a government agent who is not only armed to the hilt and inclined to shoot first and ask questions later but also woefully ignorant of the fact that he works for you, if you value your life, you dont talk back. This sad reality came about as a result of our being asleep at the wheel. We failed to ask questions and hold our representatives accountable to abiding by the Constitution, while the government amassed an amazing amount of power over us, and backed up that power-grab with a terrifying amount of military might and weaponry, and got the courts to sanction their actions every step of the way. However, once the dust settles and youve had a chance to catch your breath, I hope youll remember that the Constitution begins with those three beautiful words, We the people. In other words, there is no government without usour sheer numbers, our muscle, our economy, our physical presence in this land. There can also be no police stateno tyrannyno routine violations of our rights without our complicity and collusionwithout our turning a blind eye, shrugging our shoulders, allowing ourselves to be distracted and our civic awareness diluted. So where do we begin? How do we go about wresting back control over our freedoms and our lives in the face of such seemingly insurmountable odds? Theres an old adage, albeit not a very palatable one, that says when eating an elephant take one bite at a time. The point is this: when facing a monumental task, take it one step at a time. In other words, were going to have to wage these battles house by house, car by car, and body by body. Most importantly, as I point out in my book A Government of Wolves: The Emerging American Police State, were going to have to stop the partisan bickeringyou can leave that to the yokels in Congressand recognize that the suffering brought about by a police state will be the great equalizer, applying to all Americans, regardless of their political leanings (the fact that we are all now being targeted for government surveillance is but a foretaste of things to come). As John Adams rightly noted, The Revolution was effected before the war commenced. The Revolution was in the minds and hearts of the people. This radical change in the principles, opinions, sentiments and affections of the people was the real American Revolution. Its time for a second American Revolution. Not a revolution designed to kill people or tear down and physically destroy society, but a revolution of the minds and souls of human beingsa revolution promulgated to restore the freedoms for which our founders sacrificed their fortunes and their lives. John W. Whitehead is a civil liberties and human rights attorney and founder of the Rutherford Institute where this article first appeared. He is also the author of several books. 