Man Plans 9/11 Redux to Prove Conspiracy Theories By Crashing Plane Into Old BuildingBy Mac Slavo But it is sure to draw plenty of attention. An American expat living in Thailand is hoping to raise enough money to purchase an old jet and an old building in the countryside in effort to recreate the attacks of 9/11 on the Twin Towers. Though he says he isnt a conspiracy theorist, Paul Salo is hoping to use this 9/11 redux demonstration to lend credence to those who say the impact of a plane crash wasnt enough to cause the collapses seen on September 11 or to disprove those ideas once and for all. The Daily Mail reports: An American expat who lives in Thailand is raising money to recreate the September 11, 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center in an effort to prove conspiracy theories right or wrong. [] The American entrepreneur, who has lived in Asia since 1989, added that he thinks his reconstruction will find that there was similar physics that caused the twin towers in New York to collapse. Were going to purchase a 747 or equivalent aircraft thats about to go out of service, were going to fill it full of jet fuel, were going to purchase a building thats about to be torn down in the countryside and were going to crash it at 500 miles per hour into that building, he says in the video. If theres just a smoking hole in the building and nothing happens, you pretty much know it was a hoax, right? Cause its obvious, right? Heres his video explaining the project: Through a Facebook page titled 9/11 Redux, Paul Salo hopes to raise between $300,000 and $1.5 million through crowdfunding in order to buy the used plane, the building and pay for the crew necessary to oversee the project and verify the specs and assess the similar structure of the building he would use. Crowfunding project: We will autopilot fly a fully loaded 767 or equivalent aircraft into the closest building we can find in structure to the WTC. A force for truth when there are no other options. The gov wont do it. Companies wont do it. Individuals cant do it. We do it. Join us. The entire event would be filmed from multiple angles, and the planes black box would provide data about what took place in the staged crash. With the aid of experts and building inspectors, he aims to make the event as similar as possible to the original without, of course, any people in harms way. Salo claims that he has been in early talks with the Thai military and that he isnt pushing any one side of the contentious debate about what really happened on 9/11 that continues to stir controversy and deep-seated feelings about a government conspiracy. Salo writes on Facebook: We dont have a fixed mindset: Open for any truth that will come through these activities. Those who have questioned the truth about 9/11 have pointed to statements by the engineers and architects of the actual World Trade Center who suggest that jet fuel could not have caused the collapse of the buidings heavily reinforced steel column structure. Numerous groups, including Architects Engineers for 9/11 Truth, have challenged the official version of events and sought to disprove the government narrative. Paul Salo, however, does not claim to be affiliated with any of these people he just wants to stage the crash to add firsthand example to the ongoing debate on all sides. The technical differences between the enormous skyscrapers that once stood in lower Manhattan and the kind of old building that can be bought up may be significant, but there is no doubt that the gutsy crowdfunding project would be an interesting addition to the debate. Do you think the experiment would offer proof? Read more: Click here to subscribe: Join over one million monthly readers and receive breaking news, strategies, ideas and commentary. You can read more from Mac Slavo at SHTFplan.com In order for the experiment to work out properly, the building also needs to be wired for demolition. Once the airplane fails to bring down the building, they can then use the explosives. This would provide the no brainer method for how buildings are eliminated. A second airplane can be used to attempt to bury itself into the ground. For the final airplane act, a third plane can be use to vanish into a reinforced structure, resembling the Pentagon. If only a smaller building can be found, a smaller airplane should be used. All should be proportional. Regarding building seven, a few floors of a building can be lit on fire to see how long it takes to collapse. Yes, lets do it! The architects said (more or less) a plane hitting the tower would be like a fly hitting a screen. i heard it compared to poking a pencil through a window screenthe mesh is too solidly joined together to be torn apart that easily How does he intend to fly a 747 500 mph at ground level, way over Vmax which is one more reason the official story is BS. Where is he going to get a reinforced military drone? He hasnt done his homework. If you havent already, see my comment below on trying to fly a large commercial jet airliner at cruising speed at sea level. I did the math a long time ago. It would be hilarious if it werent so hair-raising. Purchase an old building in the countryside thats about to be torn down??? So over in Thailand they just have 110 story skyscrapers dotting the countryside? Some farms and some forests and a few mega skyscrapers just sitting out in a field somewhere. Sounds legit. Yeah and he is an expat (CIA?) who makes sure its known he isnt a conspiracy theorist. 2+2= I tried to watch the second video a second time, but the browser said the page could not be found. I saw a horizontal plume of smoke, just below the falling dust, twice. On another video, the same had been photoshopped in, but here they were in the correct position. The plumes indicate an explosion on one of the external steel girders. As someone who has been involved in several controlled demolitions, and who has some knowledge of the unique structure of the old WTC, my first impression of the fall of the towers was they were great examples of a perfectly controlled demolition that went almost exactly right. I also saw evidence that some of the steel girders had been cut by explosive charges, not damages by fire or falling. One of the comments contained the first estimates of the planes speeds at the time of the crashes, and these were far higher than I had estimated form the videos. Excellent post. BTW, the well researched documentary The New Pearl Harbor does a good job reviewing the Vmax issue on 9/11. Ive also come across the analogy of a sprinter trying to run underwater. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dWUzfJGmt5U 