US Appeals to Law of the Jungle in MH17 CaseTony Cartalucci At one point, US State DepartmentDeputy Spokesperson Marie Harf, told journalists that the summation of US evidence was YouTube videos and other forms of social media all of which are admittedly unverifiable and some of which is veritably fabricated. The abject failure of the United States to once again put forth credible evidence amid a firestorm of propaganda and rush to judgement and subsequent action echoes the attempted rush to war after NATO-member Turkey and Saudi Arabia assisted terrorists from the Syrian Al Qaeda franchise, Al Nusra, in carrying out a false-flag sarin gas attack in Damascus in August 2013. It also echoes the fallacious, fabricated evidence peddled before the United Nations regarding Iraqi weapons of mass destruction that in fact did not exist but led to the invasion and nearly decade-long occupation of Iraq and over a million dead. The serial fabrications the West has produced to advance its agenda worldwide is a troubling indictment of the international order it presumes itself chief proponent of and arbiter over. It appears to be an international order where the law of the jungle, prevails over the rule of law. Instead of an impartial investigation to ascertain the facts surrounding the downing of MH17, the US has resigned to citing YouTube clips as the basis upon which it seeks to undermine, isolate, and diminish the nation of Russia and its population of 142 million people, both politically and economically. Harf insists on behalf of the US government that commonsense dictates who is responsible for the downing of MH17 but to that a simple question can be asked, and demonstrably answered cui bono?Downing the Malaysian airliner with nearly 300 on board and blaming it on Russia has been the game changer desperately needed by NATO and its collaborators in Kiev to turn the tides in a battle they were decisively losing, politically, tactically, strategically, and economically. Another curiosity is the fact that most of the intelligence the US claims to have is in reference to YouTube clips, photography, and conclusions drawn on a series of pro-Kiev Ukrainian blogs (written in English). Is US intelligence simply reading blogs? Or are the blogs somehow a clearinghouse of US intelligence? Or are the blogs fabrications by US intelligence in an attempt to frame Russia? One in particular, Ukraine at War, is a definitive collection of fabrications, biased propaganda, and dubious claims that appear to precede US intelligence claims. The list of questions the US must answer after its nearly week-long campaign of baselessly accusing Russia is growing exponentially with diversions, evasions, and juvenile deferrals to social media only further compromising Americas waning credibility. Tony Cartaluccis articles have appeared on many alternative media websites, including his own at Land Destroyer Report, Alternative Thai News Network and LocalOrg. Read other contributed articles by Tony Cartalucci here. 