Muslims Are FURIOUS After Federal Court Shuts Down Sharia Event According to reports, a federal appeals court affirmed a trial courts dismissal of a lawsuit against a city and school system. They were reportedly being sued for canceling an event featuring speakers who oppose Sharia law in America. Michigan lawmaker David Agema and three other individuals wanted to conduct an event at a public school in Allegan to build support for their legislation to prevent Islamic law from being used in Michigan. They also wanted to warn about the public dangers the speakers believe Islam presents to Americans. Kamal Saleem was scheduled to be one of the speakers, until police became aware that terrorists had put a bounty on his head. After this news was made public, officials canceled the event. Agema and other organizers filed a federal lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan against the school, local police, and city, alleging viewpoint discrimination n violation of the First Amendment of the Constitution. The federal district court dismissed the case, holding that the plaintiffs lawyers had failed to assert the necessary facts and law in their court pleadings. The court also maintained that although defendants had offered to settle the suit, that plaintiffs could not prevail in that fashion because they made a counteroffer rather than accepting the defendants settlement offer. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit affirmed in part and reversed in part, agreeing with the lower court that the pleadings filed in the trial court were deficient in not fulfilling the minimum standards of asserting facts to show that the plaintiffs were making plausible arguments. They also agreed the case must be dismissed. Since the complaint did not allege sufficient facts to find an applicable municipal policy or custom, we need not address the parties arguments about whether the complaint plausibly alleged a deprivation of constitutional rights, Judge Bernice Donald wrote for the court. What do you think of this decision? 