1.7 Million Truck Drivers May Soon Be Replaced By RobotsBy Jake Anderson Analysts say that within the next decade, giant automakers and ridesharing companies will easily be able to replace their human employees with driverless trucks. If this happens, it will eliminate one of the only remainingmiddle-class jobs that does not require a college degree. The likelihood of this happening is greater than one might think. Earlier this month, Uber announced it would be testing driverless cars in Pittsburgh. The ride-sharing company said its beta rollout would include humans behind the wheel in a supervising capacity. Many took this news as an anomaly, assuming the technology is still far from being utilized. The reality is,autonomous cars are actually closer than you may think from hitting the roadways. It seems integration and monetization are the major unknown factors that remain. Uber CEO Travis Kalanick believes driverless cars wont destroy jobs so much as replace them with new jobs. The only examples he gives to support this claim are that peoplewillbe necessary for maintaining the fleet and assisting with dangerous road conditions. However, in the same statement, he projected some bleak numbers: I can imagine 50,000 to 100,000 drivers, human drivers, alongside a million car network. This would suggest one human driver for every 10 vehicles in a fleet. This means major job losses, and it would seem the trucking industry is going to be the first to sustain these losses. Stanford analyst and lecturer, Jerry Kaplan, explains why. We are going to see a wave and an acceleration in automation, and it will affect job markets, says Kaplan. Long-haul truck driving is a great example, where there isnt much judgment involved and its a fairly controlled environment. Taxis, buses, and delivery vehicles which account for another 1.7 million jobs will likely be in next in line, along with ride-sharing drivers. Such prognostications are spurring some to question whether America will have to implement a Universal Basic Income (UBI) in order to protect people who lose their jobs to robots. This article (1.7 Million Truck Drivers May Soon Be Replaced By Robots) is free and open source. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commonslicense with attribution to Jake Anderson and theAntiMedia.org. Anti-Media Radioairs weeknights at 11pm Eastern/8pm Pacific. If you spot a typo, emailedits@theantimedia.org. Maybe for automobiles in the big cities but as far as big trucks going driver-lessthis article is BS because its never going to happen on public roadways paid for with public tax money. Now if they want to run driver-less trucks on some kind of private roadway that will be all fine and dandy. But driver-less trucks and all the safety issues contained therein are like unicorn sightings especially when bargaining time for contracts for Teamster and other Union driving jobs is either here or on the horizon. Its never going to happen (on public roadways) When was the last time the public good triumphed over Americas corporate profiteers and their political stooges? I cant seem to remember. Actually, driver-less rigs would be a lot safer than human drivers. Let me toss out an example from personal experience. My step dad was a long haul driver. He come in on the weekends and drank. Well, he was driving a pick up truck and drunk. He had an accident on his own time, not at all work related. The fact that he got a DUI out of the write up saw the company he drove for fire him. He had become an insurance liability to them, even if he did not drink on the job. Imagine though a long haul trucker that did drink on the job, even if only a a bracer nip on a cold night. Willing to gamble on odds even a shot wont cause impairment? Willing to risk a rig rolling up over a school bus due to an intoxicated human driver? Yes, I know there are standards, protocols, laws to help prevent that happening. I also know human truckers up until recently, and maybe still do carry three log books / lie books. They use one for the cops and DOT, another for the company, a third as a personal log. Want to figure out which lie book is closets to objective truth? Maybe the drunk driver does not log his one nip to warm up. Point being laws, protocols, standards can be and are corrupted and abused. With robotic or automated drivers, there is no risk of intoxication. The risk of exhaustion is also eliminated and no need for a driver to do 8 on, 8 off. That means deliveries are delivered faster, on time. That means savings to businesses, trucking and otherwise. That means business/capital gets more ROI in the profits it can now reap. That will be the baseline too. Do humans do it cheaper or require more cost? Do humans make more errors? Please dont misunderstand me. I know people will be put out of work. Hey driver, why not go learn to be computer literate, maybe even able to program computers? Why not go learn the veterinary trade? You might even volunteer in your childrens schools to do reading time. There is other work still out there which will need doing for a little while yet. Learn to do something aside from driving to live, try living just to live. You might even get into homesteading, possibly find a way to automate gardening further in an effort to help supply clean food and water for everyone. You might even go join a volunteer rescue squad, go drive a meat wagon and help save lives. We as a human race now need to unite because we soon might not have that chance. We need to abolish fascism, the corporate ran government, the oligarchy. It will be that aspect of ourselves what bring about dire situations. Do I have all the answers? No, I dont. I do know though what Im seeing and it looks bleak. I think we can weather it though, we have so far. Robots are comingbe flippin burgers..before ya know itthen the only work will be to fix the thingbefore it turns on its masters and the complete AI will merge and meld into one. The machine will take control. Forbidden Planet and Robbie the chunkie, lovable robot. (circa 1950s) Your social theories are just as junked out as the current paradigm we live in! Here is why: I agree. The elite should not be appropriating WHAT DOES NOT BELONG TO THEM. However, to say that something that is highly useful to everyone must then become some collective hive property (like some technology or a new medicine or whatever) of all is STEALING. (whether one does it or a group, stealing is taking what is not rightfully yours). Therefore, while on surface your social theory of ZWT is appealing, it is corrupt at its core. You want something? You work for it. You do not get something for nothing, this is natural. Technology is immaterial. If you did not build it from your own work, it is not yours and you have no say so over it. Your theory is just more communism with a shiny wrapping paper and a new ribbon. What about unemployment benefits, and all those Government social welfare programs? Do you think that is the poor people STEALING form the rich or the tax payers, which they dont deserve? In the coming 10 to 20 years due to this automation, there are more chance of you (or your children) losing the job and becoming unemployed and needing the UBI. Would hold this same position? Back in the 1980s when I published the book, the capitalist and the communist ideologues were all against my theory. They argued that reduction of working hours to ZERO is impossible, the entire social production would collapse. What do you think of it in todays situation? By the way the ZAD is poised against communism an alternative to Marxian Scientific Socialism. Do you really known what communism theory basically means? Hiya VallaB01, I already answered those questions you present: what about unemployment benefits govt social welfare programs with this: However, to say that something that is highly useful to everyone must then become some collective hive property (like some technology or a new medicine or whatever) of all is STEALING. (whether one does it or a group, stealing is taking what is not rightfully yours). Therefore, while on surface your social theory of ZWT is appealing, it is corrupt at its core. You want something? You work for it. You do not get something for nothing, this is natural. Technology is immaterial. If you did not build it from your own work, it is not yours and you have no say so over it. Your theory is just more communism with a shiny wrapping paper and a new ribbon. Unemployment is nice, I have collected from time to time in the past between jobs. However, that unemployment benefit I had to pay for out of my checks in the way of taxes and other extorted monies from my checks, that money does not come from a vacuum. Now as for govt social welfare programs, no one would need them if the government had not ****ed up everything to start with. I absolutely DO NOT TRUST GOVERNMENT IN ANY CAPACITY TO DO: 1. what is right, 2. what is efficient, 3. what is fair, 4. what is economical and sound. Govt ALWAYS SCREW UP 100% of the time. Retarded children can do a better job running a country than this group of corrupt jackasses currently making policy. And you want to give them MOAR power to **** up even more stuff? Get real man! UBI is a joke. It makes everyone valueless and money is just pointless in such a system. Why bother with money if it is just going to be given away? Furthermore, why would I want MOAR government handouts? For every handout, there is control from them to me. They will know how much I get because they give it to me, they know what I buy and they can then also tell me what I cannot buy and what I MUST BUY and even when to buy it. Your social theories would make us all 100% total slaves to government. Disobey any of their stupid arbitrary Joo laws and find your UBI gone. Oops, what then? Your ideas have too many unintended consequences. Think it out more. Go back to Gods principles: you work, you eat. You dont work, you dont eat. You eat what you earn. (sort of like how animals get to eat what they kill, you know?) HIYA, Pyra Gorgon After all, what I gather from your talk is that you are totally against the UBI, thats OK with me. You need not beat around the bush to make that point. VallaB01; You preach more Communism/ Marxism/ whatever. Different names, same results: the masses of human souls become slaves to the overlord masters who are psychotic, control freak Satanists. You mentioned Carl Marx, so do not try and back peddle and claim you are not a Communist/ Marxist/ Socialist (euphemism for marxist) when every idea you promote comes from Marxist playbooks. UBI is definitely communism. Stop lying and claiming it is something else. Its not, and I do not need another eye full of Marxist propagandist nonsense. So what is it I am supposed to grasp about automation that I do not currently grasp? Because here is what I am saying, lets not mince words and fluff up posts with prose, but lets go big with ALL CAPS: With all that in mind, how can you fix anything? You cannot fix basic human nature, that is how God made us. There is no way around it. And God also made us to have a sense of human dignity, concepts of privacy, self-ownership, gratitude, sense of accomplishment (even God said after creation, It is good), property ownership, duty to community, and resolve. Where are any of these human qualities in your social engineering theories? You neglect every one of these with your UBI, your ZWT, and some other acronyms I dont know/ dont care what they are. So address these questions again, VallaB01: 