Are New Vaccine Mandates Designed to Target the Poor?By Joshua Krause Or do they? Well, yes and no. No in the sense that I dont think we are headed towards a future that forces everyone to take the jab, but the answer will likely be yes for folks who dont have a lot of disposable income. For reasons that I will explain below, you can bet your bottom dollar that there will always be a way to avoid vaccinations for you and your family. However, its going to cost you. For instance, take Californias proposed vaccine law. It doesnt provide any harsh punishment for failing to vaccinate your children. All it says is that your child cant attend school without the required vaccines. It doesnt say anything about homeschooling. If you can afford to hire a personal tutor for your kids, or you make enough money to let your spouse stay home, then you can avoid this altogether. I suspect this might become a new trend, and it wont be restricted to the United States. In Australia, the government recently stated that if any family refuses to vaccinate their children, they will be denied medical benefits to the tune of $11,400. For a low-income family thats a huge hit, but for the upper class thats just a drop in the bucket. Mind you, they didnt say that their children will be taken by the state or their parents will be charged with child endangerment. Its just going to cost them to keep their kids vaccine free. If these Western governments truly believed that vaccines save lives and avoiding them was dangerous, wouldnt they be more willing to imprison parents for putting their childrens lives in danger? Their half-hearted attempts to stifle vaccine-free families, says it all. Granted, in the future there will be some heavy-handed attempts to hurt families that dont want to vaccinate. Earlier this year, the Washington Department of Social and Health Services threatened to take away a child because their parents didnt want to give her a flu vaccine. However, does anyone believe that social services would take away a child from a rich family, with connections and easy access to legal help? Do you see what Im getting at here? They will always leave loopholes for the benefit of the elites, but those loopholes will filter out anyone who doesnt have the cash. To some extent, this situation already exists in America. There are only two states that dont allow any personal belief or religious exemptions: Mississippi and West Virginia, i.e. two of the poorest states in America. Somehow I doubt that the financial and political elite spend a whole lot of time in those states. On that note, theres plenty of evidence to suggest that the elites dont vaccinate their children at the same rate as the middle class. Jon Rappoport pointed out last month that in New Mexico, the Los Alamos school district has the highest rate of vaccine exemptions in the state. In all likelihood, these are the children of parents who work for the Los Alamos National Laboratory. Thats the highest rate of non-vaccination in the state. Were talking about parents who work at the US Los Alamos Labs. People with advanced degrees in science. People who work for the federal government. You would think the vaccine rate in that environment would stand at 100%, no questions asked. What do these people know? Why are they opting out of vaccinations for their kids? Hmm, lets think. For example, have they done some actual research on their own, and have they decided that vaccines are unsafe and ineffective? Lets not forget that in California, private schools have significantly higher rates of vaccine non-compliance than their public school counterparts. There appears to be a large segment of Americas elite that doesnt want to vaccinate their children. Do they know something the rest of us dont? And given the power this class wields in our state, federal, and local governments, how much do you want to bet that before California passes this legislation, they will exempt private schools from the law? By now, some of you might be asking yourselves why they would do this? Why would the poor be forced into this while the rich get a pass? As I mentioned before, this is a growing trend that is international in scope, and the truth of the matter may lie beyond our borders. If this story from Kenya is any indication, then these laws have a truly nefarious purpose behind them. HCG was developed by the WHO as a long-term contraceptive. It causes the body to attack a fetus through an antibody response, and can cause spontaneous abortions for 3 years after the woman is injected with the drug. Dr. Muhame Ngare of Mercy Medical Centre in Nairobi said: We sent six samples from around Kenya to laboratories in South Africa. They tested positive for the HCG antigen.They were all laced with HCG. This proved right our worst fears; that this WHO campaign is not about eradicating neonatal tetanus but a well-coordinated forceful population control mass sterilization exercise using a proven fertility regulating vaccine. This evidence was presented to the Ministry of Health before the third round of immunization but was ignored. (source) To me, it looks like these laws have all the trappings of a eugenics agenda. Do you honestly still believe these vaccines are safe? Joshua Krause is a reporter, writer and researcher at The Daily Sheeple, where this first appeared. He was born and raised in the Bay Area and is a freelance writer and author. You can follow Joshuas reports at Facebook or on his personal Twitter. Joshuas website is Strange Danger . 