Zika: Who Launched the Fake-Epidemic Story in Brazil?By Jon Rappoport This is an article that explains a great dealbut, with apologies, it involves a line of reasoning, in order to reach a conclusion. That means some readers (not my regular readers) may find it odd. Some readers with short attention spans may suddenly want to switch to a wrestling show or a shopping network. To them I say: give this a try; it does have a payoff; it has its own kind of shock and surprise; explosions do go off in the mind; it is like a ten-car pile-up on the interstate in the fog, late at night; and there is a very nasty plot. Out of nowhere, a month ago, we were told there was an outbreak of microcephaly in Brazil: over 4,000 cases of babies born with small heads and brain impairment. The Brazilian researchers then went in and took a closer look at that figure. They walked it back and said there were, at best, only 404 confirmed cases of microcephaly. Going from 4,000 cases to 404 cases was a revelation. It means there is no reason to claim, so far, that there is an epidemic of microcephaly. Then, another stunner. Of the 404 cases, only 17 had a relationship with the Zika virus. Therefore, obviously, there was no Zika-causing-microcephaly story, either. Even in those 17 cases, the mere presence of the Zika virus was no evidence the virus was causing microcephaly in 17 babies. A virus has to be more than present. It has to be there in huge numbers in an individual human. And the Brazilian researchers havent provided any evidence that Zika was present in huge numbers in any of the 17 babies. There is more. The whole effort of the researchers was to show, if possible, that Zika was present in all the 404 microcephaly cases. You see, they were doing preliminary work. They were looking for the cause of microcephaly. And when youre on that kind of hunt, youre trying to find some factor that is present in most or all cases. Otherwise, its not the cause. The Zika hunting expedition failed miserably. The researchers actually showed that Zika wasnt the cause. Let me put it to you this way. 400 tourists staying a hotel fall ill with the same symptoms. Researchers try to find the cause. They propose, as a preliminary idea, that the tourists all ate apple sauce. So they interview the sick tourists, they examine the contents of their stomachs, they talk to kitchen workersand they discover only 17 of the 400 tourists ate apple sauce. Conclusion? Apple sauce is not the cause of the illness. There is no reason to claim its the cause in the 17 people who ate it, either. Apple sauce, as an explanation, is a complete dud. All right. So we have no evidence that there is a widespread epidemic of microcephaly. And for those cases that do exist, we have no evidence, so far, that Zika virus is the cause. Given all this, a few new questions naturally arise. How did the notion that Zika virus might be the cause suddenly appear in the first place? And who started the story that there was an epidemic of microcephaly? Let me take up that second question. Apparently, several doctors at two or three hospitals in Brazil noticed more babies with microcephaly than usual. Their report went to someone at the Brazilian health authority. And then a call went out all over the country asking for reports of cases of microcephaly. Those reports came in. They werent necessarily accurate. When the numbers were added up, they came to more than 4000. Then, researchers began to sift through 3,670 of those reports to see what was actually happeningand so far, they see only 404 cases of microcephaly. Now lets look at the first question: who proposed the apple sauce? Who proposed the idea that Zika, a virus known about since 1947, a virus which had never been known to cause more than mild transient illness, a virus surely present in humans all over the planet, was now suddenly wreaking great devastation in babiesdeformity, brain damage? Who made that very strange leap? Here is a clue. This is a quote from a World Health Organization press release, dated January 28, 2016: WHO to convene an International Health Regulations Emergency Committee on Zika virus and observed increase in neurological disorders and neonatal malformations: In May 2015, Brazil reported its first case of Zika virus disease. Since then, the disease has spread within Brazil and to 24 other countries in the region. This is clearly a deception. The first Zika case in Brazil, for a virus thats been known about since 1947? In India, Zika has been known about (Zika Fever) for a long, long time. Discovering the first Zika case in Brazil has some special meaning? As I stated above, its well known that the virus causes only mild illness and goes away in a short time. So why would anyone care about a Zika case in Brazil? As for the WHO assertion that Zika has subsequently spread (like an epidemic) throughout Brazil and 24 other countries, this is absurd. It would be like saying, We discovered a person driving a Volkswagen in Brazil. Since then, the occurrence of people driving Volkswagens had spread across Brazil and 24 other countries. No, the drivers and the Volkswagens were already there. Why would researchers at WHO make this fundamental error? Why would they make this preposterous claim? Part of the reason leads back to a preoccupation with (actually, an obsession with) hunting for viruses. Hunting for them, finding them, and then, based on no solid evidence, claiming they cause various disease-conditions. Ill continue with a further quote from the January 28 WHO media release: Arrival of the virus in some countries of the Americas, notably Brazil, has been associated with a steep increase in the birth of babies with abnormally small heads A causal relationship between Zika virus infection and birth defects and neurological syndromes has not been established, but is strongly suspected. Notice the use of the phrase, associated with. This is not true, as weve seen, because the Brazilian researchers have found the Zika virus (or indirect evidence of it) in only 17 of the 404 confirmed cases of microcephaly. There is no association. There is disassociation. Remember, in order to begin to say a particular virus is causing a disease, you must find it in almost all, or all, cases of that condition. What WHO is pointing to, re Zika, doesnt even begin to approach this standard. And as you can see from the above quote, WHO admits they have established no causal connection between Zika and microcephaly. Yet WHO has been spearheading the drive to blame Zika and, yes, invent the idea that there is a spreading epidemic of Zika. Much of what youre reading and seeing in the mainstream press about this epidemic comes directly out of WHO press releases and director Margaret Chans remarks. WHO is determined to fabricate a viral epidemic and its causal connection to microcephaly. Here is the final quote I want to highlight from the January 28 WHO media release: WHOs Regional Office for the Americas (PAHO) has been working closely with affected countries since May 2015. PAHO has mobilized staff and members of the Global Outbreak and Response Network (GOARN) to assist ministries of health in strengthening their abilities to detect the arrival and circulation of Zika virus through laboratory testing and rapid reporting. The aim has been to ensure accurate clinical diagnosis and treatment for patients, to track the spread of the virus and the mosquito that carries it, and to promote prevention, especially through mosquito control. Notice the date mentioned in the quoteMay 2015. Thats when the first case of Zika was discovered in Brazil. WHO sent people to the scene immediately. They sent their virus hunters from GOARN, which is the WHO equivalent of the CDCs Epidemic Intelligence Service (EIS). The virus hunters. Show them a situation; they will find a virus and make an warranted claim about it and push the story forward. Thats what theyve done, against all the counter-evidence. Theyve invented a epidemic that doesnt exist, blaming it on a virus that has never caused serious illness, and theyve connected that virus, with no evidence, to microcephaly. It would be like saying, There was a 20-car crash on the interstate last night, and three miles away, on a lonely road, a boy was walking with his dog. The boy is the prime suspect. He is associated with the car crash. And then, on top of that absurdity, we discover that, on the interstate, we can only find two cars that have collided, not 20. But the biggest public-health agency in the world is sticking to its story about the 20-car crash and its association with the boy walking his dog. This does not indicate a mere error. This indicates a fixation. We must find a virus and claim it is the cause. It also indicates an intention to fabricate. All right. Weve now reached the end of the first part of my argument. Lets proceed and go to motive. For that exposition, I rely on the very well-known consequences of WHO making its entirely unwarranted and bogus case: an epidemic can be announced. They (WHO) can claim there is an epidemic caused by a spreading virus. Follow me here. This is crucial. Merely saying there are some microcephaly cases in Brazil, and they can come from many different causessince any insult to the developing fetal brain can bring about microcephalya toxic drug, a toxic pesticide, the pregnant woman falls down a flight of stairsmerely saying there are some microcephaly cases in Brazil creates no appearance of a contagious epidemic spreading around the world. For WHO, thats a non-starter. It goes nowhere. But linking microcephaly to a virus and then discovering the virus has broken out of its previous containment in Brazil and is traveling around the world and is causing microcephaly now WHO is in business. Constructing these several garish lies and hooking them together achieves multiple objectives. The people at WHO may be crazy, but they arent stupid. They understand how much hay they can make through their invention. With the fairy tale about a galloping virus and its potential to create, in any pregnant woman, brain damage to her developing baby, they have a scary epidemic to run and manage and control. They have work, in the same way a movie director has work with a good script that can sell vs. one that wont. Their allies can rush to develop a (completely unnecessary) vaccine. When the vaccine is ready (ready to make large profits), WHO can run that operation, too, by issuing all sorts of alerts about the need to get vaccinated. WHO can also issue health directives about prevention to every national government on Earth, thus cementing its superior role as a leading planetary command-post. In past articles, Ive examined destructive agendas coalescing around multiple factors: toxic vaccines; the promotion and induction of illness; the virus as a cover story invoked to protect, for example, mega-corporations that poison populations with pesticides; the in-utero-to-cradle-to-grave system of toxic medical care, and so on. In this article, I just want to show how the invention of an epidemic occurs, how its done. How its put together. This is one aspect of the medical Matrix right in front of your eyes: the twisting and curling and distorting and forcing of disparate data into one coordinated scenario that, on analysis, completely falls apart. Let me give it to you in one boiled-down imaginary quote: Okay, boys, this is what we have. Some cases of microcephaly in Brazil. Not many confirmed cases. So, first thing, we have to blow that number up. Get rolling on that. Next, we have this harmless dud of a virus, Zika, which we can find in all sorts of people anywhere in the world. It means nothing, of course, but were going to make it mean something. Were going to claim it causes microcephaly. Wow. Even Im blown away by the sheer audacity of that. Once we make this spurious connection, we can say women all over the planet are at risk. We can say the virus is spreading and we can confirm that through testing because, as we know, its already there. Its been there forever. Anywhere. Everywhere. And we say, you see, this virus that causes a horrible birth defect is spreading and popping up in a dozen, 20, 40, 70 countries. Now were in business. We potentially have the fight-or-flight mechanism of the whole planet under our control. Thats our goal. Lets get to work and see how far we can take this Good Battles Evil fairy tale. Remember, were the Good. People need to be controlled. Otherwise, who knows what they might do? We do the controlling. Indeed. (To read about Jons mega-collection, Power Outside The Matrix, click here.) The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here. The payoff was well worth the read. Im not a scientist but this is not the first time the who has attempted to create a pandemic out of thin lies. MOMs the world over should recognize the WHO combined w/ the AMA is not your friend and neither is Billie reduce the world population through vaccines Gates. thats my guess also. My husband has been a scientist for over 40 yrs (immunologist/microbiologist for state of Pennsylvania in the 70s and 80s.) He says WHO and CDC have been corrupt since at least that time. He personally came across a number of coverups by them. That is all I will say. So when WHO said Glyphosate causes cancer it was a lie, also?? Am I supposed to assume WHO always lies? That would make Monsanto very happy, no? Monsanto could continue poisoning the world with Glyphosate and everybody would says WHO always lies, dont listen. If everything WHO proclaimed was a lie, they would be out of business in a New York minute. Good deception relies on lots of solid, provable facts to hide their poisonous lies in. Then he needs to leak this info by what ever means possible, friend. It could save lives. If I had real info from the inside I would use it, somehow It is not a complete dud. The risk of GBS is still real and incidences are still climbing in Brazil, El Salvador, and Columbia. It can cause months or years long paralysis and three have died in Columbia from GBS as when caused by Zika, it doesnt respond as well as usual to the regular go-to immunoglobulin treatments. Zika is in ur head only. Wake up or at least try! Guillain-Barr syndrome is not caused by Zika. Never has been and never will be fact. Guillain-Barr syndrome is however a well documented side effect of vaccines, and guess what.. in every confirmed microcephaly case, the mother had been vaccinated with a Tdap vaccine whilst pregnant. There is your culprit.. Nailed it! Thank you selfnews Post should not allow Jon Big Mouth Rappoport to include the plugs for his stupendously ponderous and boring Matrix Collection. This guy is a big bullshitter and covers it up by forever and ad nauseam repeating himself like a preacher at his pulpit. Enough already! And you dont need his self-imagined hyper-perceptivity to understand that the Zika Panic is a concocted scam. It fits all the criteria of a false flag operation. selfnews Post readers should know this by now. I just scanned through 20 pages of Google news on Zika and its almost exclusively fear-mongering non-sense. How and when will we get to a Zika vaccine? by CNN is the top story, followed by several about Obama giving 1.8B to fight it. Most of the rest were about how its going to affect travel, abortion, sales of bug spray. There were several about global warming being partly to blame. The Christian Science Monitor had the most balanced article (which doesnt say much) about fear driving the story. 3 articles blasted conspiracy theorists. One even mentioned some crazy guy named Jon Rappoport. The point is: this story is REALLY being pushed, whatever the real agenda is. Usually I can find something from semi-independent sites; something that questions the official line. Not for Zika. Six, just SIX cases of the Zitka virus reported for all this uber hype. SIX!!! I was believing Jons reasoning till I saw his Matrix stuff hes selling at the bottom. Where is there any proof there were only 400 instead of 4000 cases of microcephaly in Brazil? If he has such proof why doesnt he share it? Why doesnt he provide a link to such proof? Why no footnotes or peer reviews?.. Until shown otherwise this is one more egotripper selling his conspiracy theory.. in this case cruel and heartlessly stopping people helping infected pregnant women. WHO = WHAT HAPPENED? ON 28 MAY 1959 Is Genetic heritage important to you? In the early days of #nuclear #power, #WHO issued forthright statements on #radiation risks such as its 1956 warning: Genetic heritage is the most precious property for human beings. It determines the lives of our progeny, health and harmonious development of future generations. As experts, we affirm that the health of future generations is threatened by increasing development of the atomic industry and sources of radiation We also believe that new mutations that occur in humans are harmful to them and their offspring. After 1959, WHO made no more statements on health and radioactivity. What happened? On 28 May 1959, at the 12th World Health Assembly, WHO drew up an agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); clause 12.40 of this agreement says: Whenever either organisation [the WHO or the IAEA] proposes to initiate a program or activity on a subject in which the other organisation has or may have a substantial interest, the first party shall consult the other with a view to adjusting the matter by mutual agreement. In other words, the WHO grants the right of prior approval over any research it might undertake or report on to the IAEA a group that many people, including journalists, think is a neutral watchdog, but which is, in fact, an advocate for the nuclear power industry. The IAEAs founding papers state: The agency shall seek to accelerate and enlarge the contribution of atomic energy to peace, health and prosperity through the world. Could this be the start of something big? Like the culling of the human species? Olympics 2016? Brazil being a BRIC country? just crossed my mind. Remember the fuzz about Russia winter Olympics and Ukraine revolution 