Disloyal to the United States? Wesley Clark Wants to Detain You For Duration of War on TerrorFormer US General Wesley Clark went on MSNBC to promote detaining domestic radicals or people disloyal to the United States in internment camps for the duration of the war on terror. First, Clark cites people who lose a job or break up with a girlfriend as being especially dangerous. Next he tells us what hed do to those whore disloyal to the U.S. during the war on terror. In World War II, if someone supported Nazi Germany at the expense of the United States, we didnt say that was freedom of speech. We put them in a camp, Clark continued, They were prisoners of war. If these people are radicalized, and they dont support the United States, and theyre disloyal to the United States, as a matter of principle, fine, thats their right, but its our (the governments) right and our obligation to segregate them from the normal community for the duration of the conflict. And I think were going to have to get increasingly tough on this. He needs to lock himself up under his own definition of enemy to these United States.Pathetic! Clark is a f#cking traitor ! Come and get it, Wesley. Wesley has totally lost his mind. Possibly he has some form of dementia. So, since it has now been outed that the CIA/U.S. government is one of the powers behind ISIS (besides Saudi intelligence and Mossad; and the UK is also known to have lent a hand, by airlifting arms to them), we should put the Obama administration and its appointments to the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the upper echelons of the U.S. military in one of those FEMA camps that the govt. has allotted all over the country. Right, Wesley? And perhaps you should put in your request for location now, since things are hotting up in that War youre talking about, and were all to be considered combatants??? There are no FEMA camps. If there were, I would know about them due to my profession. Also, because I have traveled the country extensively looking for them, and cannot find a single one. Unless youre able to tell me where one is so I can check it out. Meanwhile at FEMAJOYCAMP: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p0qLzsIhUMk The war on terror, talk about an oxymoron. The original united states died and was buried over a century ago. The new United States is run for the benefit of private interests. Our God given unalienable rights have been done away with and, as Wesley Clark so eloquently stated, our bodies will be thrown into prison if we dont comply with their every wish. I think you about summed it up. The Act of 1871 is what did it, when the DC corporation was created. Actually the fed went outlaw in 1861 when it violated all aspects of the constitution to wage war on the south, and the constitution has only been given lip service afterwards. yes And, few people are aware of this fact..Pres Lincoln was not this righteous upstanding follower of the law even though he was a lawyer..handling some 5000 cases I read He was a war criminal, and a rabid racist against the blacks. He threw people in prison for the duration of the war without trial if they said something that he did not like in the newspaper. yes, he was extremely disliked.actually, hated for his 1up on ya, attitude and his disregard for the basic law of which he knew damn well, the meaning ofHistory has painted him as just the opposite, knowingly so most likely..in order to sugar coat this U S A image,,,,,to hide its sins! When you rape, rob and murder, invade sovereign states, You create this myth of noble intentions while lying about the victims of your aggression. sadness to me anyway, is that its never really changed itself, concerning our USA..I myself was thrown into Nam, age 23, drafted no choice but to jail or be drafted.in country 1969and the few words you listed above describe what is still going on, only the countries names have changed.I have no comprehension of how the us populace can allow this rape,rob and murder.endlessly.even with the prestitude press.not being free to speak the truth.most people are just ignorant..guess that best describes them.even with their college degrees.For me, tis very sad to look at..tell you that! ! ! ! Here ias how it works. The first 150 to 200 years, the people coming to America were looking to make a better life. They face starvation, hostiles, wild animals, (that could and would eat you. When they walked down to the creek to get a bucket of water, they took their weapons and did not know if they were coming home. But they kept coming. As these types made the wild areas tame, the nest robbers come behind. Not enough guts to actually build anything, but knowing how to steal and rob the ones who did the building with their courts, regulations and ordinances. That is who is running the country today, the unmoral, gutless nest robbers. Most people in the US are gutless, clueless sheep. Only 3 to 4% of Americans during the American revolution were in favor of it or did anything other than stay home and hide under their beds. Percentage of people in the us who are not sheep are about the same % today. It seems to always be about the same percentage of people who actually do the building and fighting for humanity. Gutless is the best word describing the average citizen I believeBeing a 1st yr college student when JFK was murderedI listened to the thing happening live on the radio.as a radio was on in the Art Class I was enrolled in on that Friday way back then.well, the good old USA couldnt even get the truth out to the nation of that eventThat truth had to be covered, distorted.and the people on the Warren commission played right along.NO Guts.to do the right thing. Nature dictates that the herd get culled from time to time, we are fast approaching one of those times. It is my belief that the world, not just the US, is only short months from a complete economic melt down that will make 1929 look like a party, along with natural earth changes. We are talking, no food stamps, and if you have them, people are not going to have food to sell. When it comes to this, many will eat the barrel of their pistol. Many will not be able to handle this, mentally, physically, or spiritually. They will get culled. The scum robbing and raping will slowly be taken out as they come up against real men determined to protect their families. Even the sheeple will no longer believe the lies of politicians, so that class will be culled. Lawyers, armed enforcers, will be weeded out. Those who make it through will be better for their tempering in the fire and will build a better world than we have now. But it will be a long and hard road. If you have not already, look at how nature works. Say rabbits. Good times they do what people do in good times. Eat and make little ones. Get too many rabbits, nature culls them. Parasites, low food years, disease do the work. The weaker ones die off so that when good time return, the best genetic material are the ones making little ones now. People, rabbits, works the same. Do not mess with mother nature. makes sense to me John.I m from a ranching backgroundwhere a horse was how we got to school a one room one at thatgrades 1-8.1950 to 55no electricity in the farm house until 55 and no plumbing ever.at that time. So nature was my best friendremains so today..There is beauty in nature. I never tire of it. Did you realize that music comes from nature? the notes on the scale are from nature.. Do not get me wrong, I have nothing but contempt and distain for politicians, government enforcers and leg breakers and the sheeple who enable the evil to exist at the level it does. That said, I do not advocate armed revolution. Revolution for what? The sheeple of America would sell their birthright for a bowl of stew and a six-pack within 24 hours of being handed liberty an freedom. The system will go away the same way it went with the USSR. Now, if you cut the head of the snake off, you are safe, but if you go chopping little pieces of his tail off, he is going to turn around and bite you. Let us see what the people figure out. To keep the scum banker class, and those who own them, from doing the same thing after the collapse, they must be removed from the genetic pool. Sorry but thats a fact. Will humanity figure this out. I do not Know. I dont advocate armed revolt eithernor was I thinking you were saying that. Was in that mud hole in Nam. Wont get into it againSmedley Butlers book War is a racket comes to mind.you may be familiar with it..I reside in Montanaalways have.my grt grnd fath (dad side) was born in Texas in 1860.finally settling in Wyo.. I would love to talk with you, try to figure out a way to do that. I love Montana. I was a Seabee. Did close to a month in Wolf Point, working on the surrounding Reservation roads. Good people up there. Anyone, (with a functioning brain and a soul), who has been in a war will not be advocating armed revolution at this point. Yes, good book, should be mandatory reading by 8th grade. I had a brother in Nam, mine came later. Mothers side, Republic of Texas people. GG grandfather, mothers side, 13th Texas Calvary, I Co. duration of the war. Fathers side, G grandfather was a Confederate Chaplin serving with the forces of Arkansas. Left the army in 1863 to get his family out of the way of those saintly, freedom fighters in blue that hung a 13 year old nab or boy trying to make him tell where any money they had might be hide. Rapes and murders were rampant. So two coverd wagons went to Texas where it is big enough you did not have to associate with those freedom loving angels in blue, and maybe you could keep your daughters and wife form getting molested and perhaps murdered. Wow.Wolf Point.well, the farm I mentioned of growing up on, was some miles south of WP in McCone countywhen I was 10+ yrs my dad, just 29 yo was killed right in front of my eyes in a farm tractor roll over.after that we moved into Circlesouth of WP.where I still call home although I have lived in Billings MT..well, a long time.I am not retired.would be great to be able to talk without doing this stuff..let me think? one thing one could do is say, a half hour, post an email then get it right off or contact the adm with a permission slip so to speak and have the adm of this site send an email..to one of us actually if using the adm of this site, we would each have to contact the adm giving our name and email.so the site could understand the connection.my name is Robert BeasonI am comfortable with listing it here. John C. Carleton. Retired. Raise a few goats, chickens and garden some. I will give that info to the admin. But I have never done this. Are you talking Activest Post admin or Disqus. ok I will do the same.starting now..Ill email them I sent the request, see what happens. We have talked before, been a while. I thought so also. We have talked on a post beforeI shut my Disqus down qt some time ago and then decided I may want to speak on issues again, so opened anotherI am going to send my request to selfnews Post..and reference youif you sent yours to Disqusdo let me know. talk about doing the two step and the doooo C doo.with the picture show, to get the message sentSuppose they have lots of problems otherwise.. some one from the activist post.sent an acknowledgment.but not the info of yours and a web site wanting a person to enlist their own web site sent a form..wonder if that forms info will result in actually getting in your or my inbox the requested emails????? such is todays world. See what happens. If I have to, I will get a throw away cell phone, put the number out, then throw it in the burn barrel. Give them some time no chk email. I already sent you one.ACT Post did just what you and I asked of them.as I said in the email I sent to you..got to be smarter than the average bear..well at first glance to what A Post sent me..I wasnt smarter..then second look..OK.home run wanted to saydo not be put off by my not being retiredAm self employedan d love it.I handle my own account participating in the price movements of Crude Oil.on the electronic exchange.Globex.in Chicago.I had many years of physically buying crude oil in the Williston oil Basin.which the two, businesses are somewhat different.having my own trucks in the latter and so forth..If you would care..must be some way the both of us could talk.got any ideas? just occurred to meeither one of us could contact Disqus requesting their adm send an email to one of us with the email they have on record for the other of usthere again, most likely you and I would both have to tell Disqus to do that so that site would understand the connection to what they are asked to do Texas hillbilly myself. Grew up in a old house that had shingles on the outside, sheetrock on the inside and nothing in between. We had a fireplace. where i attended church did not get rid of the lille brown shack out back until I was about 15. Thanks for the info! is this the same wesley clark who said this: I said, Were going to war with Iraq? Why? He said, I dont know. He said, I guess they dont know what else to do. So I said, Well, did they find some information connecting Saddam to al-Qaeda? He said, No, no. He says, Theres nothing new that way. They just made the decision to go to war with Iraq. He said, I guess its like we dont know what to do about terrorists, but weve got a good military and we can take downGOVERNMENTS. And he said, I guess if the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem has to look like a nail. Wesley Clark is a pampered political prostitute which has sold his behind to the highest bidder. Is this the same former 4-star general, who on 21 Sept 2001, discovered the Illuminati-Israeli plan? Tsipras discovered that for himself as did Ross Perot, Vince Foster, Hussein, Gaddafi, Ambassador Stevens and countless others who have been threatened or eliminated for resisting. Wesley is a CFR SELLOUT FLAG OFFICER, a Traitor as is his good buddy Traitor david betrayus .. Is loyalty to the Constitution and rule of constitutional law disloyalty to the U.S. Federal Government and therefore the United States? Now do you understand the true reason for the southern states secession? Nailed it, Jim! I agree with you and freewheelinfranklin, above. The answer to your question, Jim, is actually, no, The Constitution is the Law of the Land; and, those like Wesley Clark are the ones who are disloyal and must be prosecuted. disloyalty to the U.S. Federal Government and therefore the United States? No, it is not the US Federal Government, because the GENERAL (often referred to as the federal) government is basically duties and authority DELEGATED to those who SERVE WITHIN our general government to carry out those tasks put into writing and DIVIDED between three separate branches by the US Constitution. We owe NO LOYALTY or ALLEGIANCE to those that SERVE WITHIN our governments, as THEY are NOT THE government, but employees elected, hired, contracted, volunteered, etc to carry out those duties listed and written within the US Constitution. Nor are they America. Our loyalty, our allegiance is to the US Constitution, as goes all Oaths. Thomas Jefferson: Our peculiar security is in the possession of a written Constitution. James Madison: Do not separate text from historical background. If you do, you will have perverted and subverted the Constitution, which can only end in a distorted, bastardized form of illegitimate government. John Adams: You have rights antecedent to all earthly governments; rights that cannot be repealed or restrained by human laws; rights derived from the Great Legislator of the Universe. Thomas Jefferson: The opinions of men are not the object of civil government, nor under its jurisdiction. Alexander Hamilton: Every act of a delegated authority, contrary to the tenor of the commission under which it is exercised, is void. No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the Constitution, can be valid. To deny this, would be to affirm, that the deputy is greater than his principal; that the servant is above his master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people themselves; that men acting by virtue of powers, may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid. Thomas Jefferson: When a man assumes a public trust, he should consider himself public property. America IS the American people and the US Constitution, NOT those that SERVE WITHIN OUR GOVERNMENTS. J. Reuben Clark: God provided that in this land of liberty, our political allegiance shall run not to individuals, that is, to government officials, no matter how great or how small they may be. Under His plan our allegiance and the only allegiance we owe as citizens or denizens of the United States, runs to our inspired Constitution which God himself set up. So runs the oath of office of those who participate in government. A certain loyalty we do owe to the office which a man holds, but even here we owe just by reason of our citizenship, no loyalty to the man himself. In other countries it is to the individual that allegiance runs. This principle of allegiance to the Constitution is basic to our freedom. It is one of the great principles that distinguishes this land of liberty from other countries. From someone a little more modern. Ronald Reagan: I had a copy of the Soviet Constitution and I read it with great interest. And I saw all kinds of terms in there that sound just exactly like our own: Freedom of assembly and freedom of speech and so forth. Of course, they dont allow them to have those things, but theyre in there in the constitution. Clark is proving that he is a TRAITOR to the American people, the US Constitution to which he is (multiple times to be at the rank that he was) Oath bound to support and defend BEFORE anything else. Those that are supporting the NWO are exactly like those that supported, and using a lot of, the same Nazi tactics against our legitimate US government, our Constitutional Republic, against the US Constitution that they took a Lawfully binding OATH to support and defend against all enemies domestic and foreign. He admits his *Treason with his words, and advocates the use of **Terrorism against the American people for practicing and using what is PROTECTED by our legitimate government, in writing within the US Constitution. When he speaks of disloyalty to the USA, he seemed serious, but he forgot that there is a long way and a huge difference that IS recognized here in America between speaking against actions committed by those who SERVE within our governments particularly those that are unAmerican in action committed by them and the acts of Treason. His support of, and actions to, destroy our legitimate government is an act of Treason in favor of the UN, NATO, NWO over America, American values, American lives. Think not? Did/do you see him actively speaking against giving US troops to the UN and THAT is TREASON nor does anyone who SERVES within our government have that authority. Yet, it is a fact that is going on now. Or against Obama (his emissaries) signing authority over the American people, the USA to the UN? This is also TREASON against the American people, the US Constitution. What about assassination powers which is legal in places like Russia, China, etc BUT NOT HERE. Here in America it IS First Degree Murder and it matters not who the person is doing it, but it does include EVERYONE who has the least part within it, who assists with it to go on instead of fighting it as required by the position they occupy within our governments state and general. That would be EVERY person who is a governmental employee occupying any position within the state or general government look at all the job openings and new jobs created to deal with all of them! Actually war cannot be on a tactic, action, idea, weight, organic farming, using water that belongs to the people, etc. War is a action against two states, nations. Clarks remarks are very revealing about the mindset of those serving within our government. Those who disagree with the government are now to be rounded up and shut up indefinitely in political internment camps we are NOT Nazi Germany, Stalinist/Lenins Russia, Maos China, etc. His words reveal his Treason. References US Constitution, Preamble: WE THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and SECURE THE BLESSINGS OF LIBERTY TO OURSELVES AND OUR POSTERITY, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United Bill of Rights, Preamble: Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine. Dr. Edwin Vieira: This has nothing to do with personalities or subjective ideas. Its a matter of what the Constitution provides The government of the United States has never violated anyones constitutional rights The government of the United States will never violate anyone constitutional rights, because it cannot violate anyones constitutional rights. The reason for that is: The government of the United States is that set of actions by public officials that are consistent with the Constitution. Outside of its constitutional powers, the government of the United States has no legitimacy. It has no authority; and, it really even has no existence. It is what lawyers call a legal fiction. the famous case Norton v. Shelby County The Court said: An unconstitutional act is not a law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties. It is, in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed. And that applies to any (and all) governmental action outside of the Constitution What are the defining characteristics of a limited government? They are its disabilities; what it does not have legal authority to do. Look at the First Amendment What does it do? It guarantees freedom of speech, freedom of press, freedom of religion. But how does it do that? I quote: Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech or of the press etcetera. Congress shall make no law; thats a statement of AN ABSENCE OF POWER. Thats a statement of a disability. (End Dr. Vieira quote. Caps are mine) EXAMPLES Amendment 1: Congress SHALL MAKE NO LAW respecting an establishment of religion, OR prohibiting the free exercise thereof; OR abridging the freedom of speech, OR of the press; OR the right of the people peaceably to assemble, AND to petition the Government for a redress of Amendment 2: A well regulated Militia, being NECESSARY TO the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED. (And required by the US Constitution, state Constitutions) Amendment 4: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, SHALL NOT BE VIOLATED, AND NO WARRANTS SHALL ISSUE, BUT UPON PROBABLE CAUSE, SUPPORTED BY OATH OR AFFIRMATION, AND PARTICULARLY DESCRIBING THE PLACE TO BE SEARCHED, AND THE PERSONS OR THINGS TO BE SEIZED. Amendment 9: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights,SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED TO DENY OR DISPARAGE OTHERS RETAINED by the people. Amendment 10: THE POWERS NOT DELEGATED TO THE UNITED STATES BY THE * Treason http://www.shastadefense.com/Dare-Call-It-Treason-21.pdf **Terrorism 28 C.F.R. Section 0.85 Terrorism is defined as the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives. Clark really needs to read the US Constitution that he gave multiple Oaths to support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion;. Because that IS his sworn duty to uphold. If after all this time SERVING within the general government he does not know that he needs to be stripped of his rank, retirement and sent back to the general populace. But we know that he is REQUIRED to know what he swore an Oath to defend and protect, how else would he know his duty? So it must be Treason on his part, a decision made knowing exactly what he was choosing. All the POS socialist democrats swear an Oath to the Constitution and it is forgotten the moment they stop saying it. Jim, the secession had a lot more to do with the southern plantation owners not wanting to give up their right to own and abuse people of a different race. That, and the prodding from the Bank of England, who wanted badly to bankrupt the upstart nation so they could regain control of the American banking system. Sad. Until now I felt that Wesley Clark did have some moral grit, but instead he has chosen to be just another cowardly Colen Powell type traitor. He is very aware that the War on Terror was in fact outright fraud and official treason and a result of false flag and officially managed cover-up of what really happened on 9-11 and who really pulled off that mass murder destruction. What if you support unequivocally America but not the corrupted leaders who are the ones really destroying the US? Who makes this determination? WE do. Read the US Constitution. It forbids a permanent military. War can ONLY be declared by the Congress. The US Constitution REQUIRES the people to be the Militia not under the control of either the general (federal) or state governments, but those that serve within the general (federal) government are REQUIRED to use the Militias to: (now you know who defends our borders, the Militia) Preamble to the US Constitution: We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. The Preamble to the US Constitution says WHO is responsible for doing certain things within our nation. Those things are to be done to form a more perfect Union. We the People of the United States are promote the general Welfare No one else is assigned those duties. The tools constitutionally assigned to We the People to carry out those duties are: Militia Constitution of the United States of America, Second Amendment: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. John Adams, A Defense of the Constitutions of the United States 475: The fundamental law of the militia is, that it be created, directed and commanded by the laws, and ever for the support of the laws. Alexander Hamilton, Federalist 28: The militia is a voluntary force not associated or under the control of the States except when called out; [when called into actual service] a permanent or long standing force would be entirely different in make-up and call. Thomas Jefferson: For a people who are free, and who mean to remain so, a well organized and armed militia is their best security. The framers even felt that the people needed their own manufacturers of ALL the weapons of war since those who serve within governments are usually easily corrupted. George Washington: A free people ought not only to be armed, but disciplined; to which end a uniform and well-digested plan is requisite; and their safety and interest require that they should promote such manufactories as tend to render them independent of others for essential, particularly military, supplies. US Constitution, Article I, Section. 8, Clause 11: To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water. This is using private citizens in their own privately owned crafts to defend the USA and her people, this is using the Militia. Rep. Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts, floor debate over the 2nd Amendment, I Annals of Congress: What, Sir, is the use of a militia? It is to PREVENT THE ESTABLISMENT OF A Clause 15: To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel invasions. The militia of each state is taxed with the defense of the USA and her people, not just with the Clause 16: To provide for organizing, ARMING, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia Congress is required to provide those military grade weapons for the militias. Congress is REQUIRED to arm the Militias, NOT foreign entities, NOT foreign nations, NOT foreign terrorists/rebels, NOR are they to arm the (constitutionally forbidden) governmental professional law enforcement. Because of the REQUIREMENT to arm the Militias the others are FORBIDDEN. Good Behaviour requirement that must be kept for all judges state and federal to be allowed to stay in the position they occupy. US Constitution, Article III, Section 1: The judicial Power of the United States shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts (state) as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, Grand Jury Thus, citizens have the unbridled right to empanel their own grand juries and present True Bills of indictment to a court, which is then required to commence a criminal proceeding. Our The grand jury is an institution separate from the courts, over whose functioning the courts do not preside, we think it clear that, as a general matter at least, no such supervisory judicial authority exists. The common law of the Fifth Amendment demands a traditional functioning grand jury. Although the grand jury normally operates, of course, in the courthouse and under judicial auspices, its institutional relationship with the judicial branch has traditionally been, so to speak, at arms length. Judges direct involvement in the functioning of the grand jury has generally been confined to the constitutive one of calling the grand jurors together and administering their oaths of office. The grand jurys functional independence from the judicial branch is evident both in the scope of its power to investigate criminal wrongdoing, and in the manner in which that power is exercised. The grand jury can investigate merely on suspicion that the law is being violated, or even because it wants assurance that it is not. It need not identify the offender it suspects, or even the precise nature of the offense it is investigating. The grand jury requires no authorization from its constituting court to initiate an investigation, nor does the prosecutor require leave of court to seek a grand jury indictment. And in its day-to-day functioning, the grand jury generally operates without the interference of a presiding judge. It swears in its own witnesses and deliberates in total secrecy. Recognizing this tradition of independence, we have said the 5th Amendments constitutional guarantee presupposes an investigative body acting independently of either prosecuting Given the grand jurys operational separateness from its constituting court, it should come as no surprise that we have been reluctant to invoke the judicial supervisory power as a basis for prescribing modes of grand jury procedure. Over the years, we have received many requests to exercise supervision over the grand jurys evidence-taking process, but we have refused them all. it would run counter to the whole history of the grand jury institution to permit an indictment to be challenged on the ground that there was incompetent or inadequate evidence before the Elections are also ours, we must make them lawful and prosecute EVERY single person participating in Election Fraud, Do away with all machine voting, and all counts at EVERY LEVEL MUST be counted here in the USA in the open where the people can watch but protected, and under multiple videos and VERIFIABLE at every level. No scan symbols IDing who is voting. Etc. Clark and all the rest of the Generals who think themselves above their oaths of office, should be put on trial for violating that oath.same for this monster so called president, vice president attorney general and right on down the line..Lets see now, who is left to manage anything? If this were done, the war on terror would disappear except for an evil foot note.to what it is..an outright LIE Who defines enemy of the United States? Well also need a definition of what United States means. These ideas of theirs, they should be careful. They could be used to imprison themselves. The US Constitution does. So, anyone still think everything is OK with the Federal Government? They create the situations about which theyre complaining and then want to take more of your freedom to fix the fix. Hey Wes! This aint much, but COME SUCK ON THIS!! How? Start jailing politicians and those that would call for the internment of law abiding American citizens. I am definitely on the side of Germany. Isnt that what happened to the Japanese Americans during WWII( pace Korematsu v US, see Wikipedia entry)? U.S. gangster thugs creating war out of thin air (the same as money) dont see any of them signing up to lead the war ahh for the good ol days when the word leader meant something. Legislate the president and his minion to go lead bunch of soft handed down lows. If he defines the Constitution as the United States Im on board. If he defines the collection of elected officials as the United States he should be locked up now. disloyal to the United States (AKA) disloyal to Israel Unfortunately disloyal to the U.S. is now synonymous with criticizing Monsanto. this sick bastard must be under orders from the deep state to promote this insanity. McCarthyism at its finest . Next, if you root against the Mets you will have to move out of New York . Mr Clark was special-personal advisor of prime minister of Romania! I.e. is a military man: army of life! 