Is Congress Declaring War on ISIS or On You?By Ron Paul The President does not have to deploy the US military to turn America into a militarized police state, however. He can use his unlimited authority to expand programs that turn local police forces into adjuncts of the US military, and send them increasing amounts of military equipment. Using the threat of ISIS to justify increased police militarization will be enthusiastically supported by police unions, local officials, and, of course, politically-powerful defense contractors. The only opposition will come from citizens whose rights have been violated by a militarized police force that views the people as the enemy. Even though there is no evidence that the governments mass surveillance programs have prevented even a single terrorist attack, we are still continuously lectured about how we must sacrifice our liberty for security. The cries for the government to take more of our privacy will grow louder as the war party and its allies in the media continue to hype the threat of terrorism. A president armed with the authority to do whatever it takes to stop ISIS will no doubt heed these calls for new restrictions on our privacy. Following last years mass shooting in California, President Obama called for restricting the Second Amendment rights of any American on the terrorist watch list. The president also used the attacks to expand the unconstitutional gun background check system via executive action. Can anyone doubt that President Obama or a future anti-gun president will use the absolute power to do whatever is necessary to stop terrorism as a justification for imposing new gun control measures? Using the war on ISIS to justify more gun control will be particularly attractive since even many pro-gun politicians will support gun control measures if they are marketed as part of the war on terror. As the American economy faces continued stagnation, and as challenges to the dollars status as the worlds reserve currency mount, an increasingly authoritarian government will impose new restrictions on our economic activities and new limits on our financial privacy. In particular, our ability to move assets out of the country will be limited, and new reporting and other requirements will limit our ability to use cash without being treated as criminals or terrorists. Those who carry large amounts of cash will find themselves at increased risk of having the cash confiscated by government agents under civil asset forfeiture laws. If Senator McConnells declaration of perpetual war passes, presidents could use the war on ISIS as a justification to impose new restrictions on our use of cash and our financial privacy via executive action. After all, they will say, the government needs to make sure cash is not being used to support ISIS. The only way to protect both liberty and security is to stop trying to impose our will on other countries by military force. The resentment created by Americas militaristic foreign policy is ISIS most effective recruiting tool. Adopting a noninterventionist foreign policy that seeks peace and free trade with all would enable the government to counter legitimate threats to our safety without creating an authoritarian police state. Ron Paul writes for his site RonPaulInstitute.org where this article first appeared. Get his latest bookSwords Into Plowshares. the wet dream of DeCeipt perpetual wars and death brought to you by labor sent to them in the illegal scam of 1913 and the U.S. irs startup in 1914. A mixture of wisdom about expanding military authorization with lunacy about how universal background checks are unconstitutional and disinformation about the terrorist watch lists, which contain less than 3% US citizens, as well as a misconception that the Bill of Rights only applies to Americans, whereas in fact, it applies to all residents. How tragic that Paul combines the most sane approach to foreign policy with such nonsense about things like guns laws, the right to discriminate trumping the right to equal treatment in public accommodations. The only word that applies is half-cracked: he is further to the left on foreign policy and in bed with the gun lobby on a law that 9 of 10 Americans support. How sad, when we need such wisdom on our criminal military adventures, that he poisons his own well. So, what are you supporting? Non-intervention abroad, and disarming Americans? I support ending US military aggression and rational gun laws. I support reducing violence. Deity is the Ens, the To on the absolute Existence, that of which the Essence is To Exist, the only Substance of Spinoza, the Being, that never could not have existed, as contra-distinguished from that which only becomes; not Nature or the Soul of Nature, but that which created Nature; but also the idea of the Male and Female Principles, in its highest and most profound sense : to wit, that God originally comprehended in Himself all that is; that matter was not co-existent with Him or dependent of Him; that He did not merely fashion and shape a pre-existing chaos into a universe; but that His Thought manifested itself outwardly in that universe, which so became, and before was not, except as comprehended in Him; that 