According to a poll released Monday, the U.S. populace remained unsure which of the presidential candidates plans to destroy natural resources and render the environment unfit for human habitation would put more Americans back to work. On one hand, President Obama has proved his commitment to creating jobs that will poison the entire American Northeast with toxic fracking chemicals, but on the other hand, Mitt Romney, with his pledge to intensify oil exploration offshore and in our nations protected wilderness, seems genuinely determined to put millions to work contaminating the oceans, exterminating scores of species, and inevitably accelerating a planetary cataclysm, said Denver voter Lynn Russell, stressing the economic importance of good-paying jobs that systematically eliminate all remaining natural resources left on earth. The candidates have so many comprehensive ideas for ensuring that our overheating planetas well as human society in generalis pushed well beyond the point of no return, but its impossible to tell which one will go slightly farther in reducing unemployment. Voters nationwide reportedly found themselves even more on the fence after learning that both candidates had pledged to build dozens of job-creating nuclear plants that, in the event of a minor mishap, could render vast regions of the nation immediately unlivable. 