U.S., Russia Reject Possibility of War Crimes InvestigationsBy Derrick Broze The International Criminal Court is losing support from super powers Russia and the United States, as well as smaller nations like the Philippines. Last weekPhilippines President Rodrigo Duterte spoke out against the court, calling it useless. The ICC recently stated that they may have jurisdiction to prosecute those who carry out killings as part of the Philippines drug war. President Duterte has encouraged the killing of drug dealers, leading to more than 2,400deaths. Duterte dismissed the court and said it was losing influence. In recent weeks the court has also been criticized by three African nations:Burundi,South Africa and Gambia. However, the biggest blow to the ICCs credibility comes from the United States and Russia. Both nations were critical of the court, with Russia completely withdrawing from the court. First, the ICC stated that the U.S. and CIA could face charges for war crimes for abuses in Afghanistan.In a new report, the ICCsaid there wasreasonable basis to believe that U.S. forces had tortured at least 61 prisoners in Afghanistan and another 27 at CIA detention facilities in 2003 and 2004. ICC headProsecutor Fatou Bensouda told Reuters that the court will decide whether to pursue a full investigation into the matter, including possible charges and arrest warrants. The U.S. State Department responded by stating that the possibility of an investigation was not warranted or appropriate. State Department spokeswoman Elizabeth Trudeau said since the U.S. has not ratified the ICC treaty they are not under its jurisdiction. We do not believe that an ICC examination or investigation with respect to actions of U.S. personnel in relation to the situation in Afghanistan is warranted or appropriate, Trudeau stated. The ICC was established in 1998 as an independent body that would prosecute war crimes and crimes against humanity. The ICC was created through a treaty signed by more than 120 nations. Countries that are not members include Israel, Qatar, Yemen, Libya, Iraq, India, China, and the United States. Although Bill Clinton signed the treaty during his presidency it was not ratified by Congress. Of course, President George W. Bush opposed the court because he knew that political investigations and prosecutions of U.S. officials would likely be forthcoming. Russia also signed the treaty but did not ratify it. It seems, Russian President Vladimir Putin may be attempting to avoid the sticky situation U.S. officials are now enduring. Putin just signed a presidential directiveannouncing that Russia would withdraw from the ICC because the ICC has failed to meet the expectations to become a truly independent authoritative international tribunal. However, the ICCs court is also accusing Russia of an on-going state of occupation, regarding Russias decision to annex Crimea in Ukraine. As Anti Media notes: Further, Russia hasbeen accused of committing war crimes in Aleppo and wider Syria over its militarys heavy bombardment of opposition-held areas. Just this week, Russia launched a large-scale offensive in Aleppo, as well as in the Syrian districts of Homs and Idlib. It used its recently deployed flotilla of warships. Now that it has become clear that not even the United States will be immune from the ICCs jurisdiction, Russia has evidently made a decision to escape trial while it still can. The decision to withdraw lends credence to the idea they are not adequately protecting civilians in Syria and that there may actually beRussian forces deployed in Ukraine, despite its assertions to the contrary. While many activists are quick to reject any claims made by international or global bodies of government, it may be that the ICC is legitimately trying to go after the decision makers and order followers within the U.S. government. Those who value autonomy and freedom would do well to remember that the State, whether on a national or international level, is an institution that will always lead to more control and domination. The institution should be opposed on both a global and national level. However, until that point comes when the State is broken down to nothing we should support investigations and arrests of those who have caused pain and suffering around the world. Derrick Broze is an investigative journalist and liberty activist. He is the Lead Investigative Reporter for selfnewsPost.com and the founder of the TheConsciousResistance.com. Follow him on Twitter. Derrick is the author of three books: The Conscious Resistance: Reflections on Anarchy and Spirituality and Finding Freedom in an Age of Confusion, Vol. 1 and Finding Freedom in an Age of Confusion, Vol. 2 Derrick is available for interviews. Please contact Derrick@activistpost.com This article may be freely reposted in part or in full with author attribution and source link. See common ground. Neither the United States nor Russia want to conform to international standards of behavior or subject their past actions to inspection. There is no RULE of LAW. So long as the Hildebeest goes unaccounted. Gee? I wonder if Putin is a globalist Hidden Hand puppetjust like Obama, Merkel, Ergodan, et al all singing from the same song sheet behind the Wizard of Oz curtain. while the MSM generates peddles the false narrative potential reality of WWIII or another Cold War as pure Wag the Dog Theater on a global stage with NATO posturing sabre rattling do add to the displayWhile its business as usual at the pyramid cap behind mega corporate closed doors. as Russia is also getting in line to accommodate the UN 2030 Agenda just like China everyone else as the bottom drops out from the Petro Dollar or whatever theyre cooking up as we transition into the Hive-Mind Borg NWO juggernaut? Sobering was not the word that came to mind terrifying is a bit closer though. words are so inadequate sometimescheers in spite of it all The ICC seems to have lost the plot entirely. To claim Russia an on-going state of occupation, regarding Russias decision to annex Crimea in Ukraine would, at the very least, require that the Crimeans themselves are willing to make this stupid and wild accusation. The US UK are responsible for killing more Iraqi Civilians around Mosul in the last two weeks than Russia and Syria have killed in two months of shelling occupied East Aleppo and how are they going to go about prosecuting countries party to the genocide being committed against the Yemen people? What about the rabid right wing neo nazi genocide of the ethnic Russians of the Donbass? What about the US arming of the Bozniaks who burned to death and murdered Serbians with those arms? What of the false information that the US supplied to imprison, wrongly as their own investigation has found, of Milosevic? When will they bring Boko Harem to justice and how? Historically large scale democide has never been subject to real justice, to include the WW2 show trials = Operation Paperclip for starters. Holodomor, 100 million slaughtered by Stalin and Mao acolytes. Modern day soft kill: Gulf oil spill, chemtrails, vaccine injuries and deaths. Yemen? Thats TPTB smacking down the Houthis who drove out their compliant puppet-in-chief preparing Yemen for assimilation into the Middle East Regional Borg Govt Collective known as the GCC. When I see sentences like this However, until that point comes when the State is broken down to nothing I believe the writer isnt giving the facts enough credence basically the state is already nothing and is suffering through some very public death pangs. Besides that when has having one state institution investigate another state institution been considered an effort to seek justice and truth? All wars are Banker engineered wars, Susan, and their tentacles have been extended around the globe for well over 200 years. They brought the Chinese and Russian communists to power and still control those supposed western adversaries today. What we are witnessing now are the moves to transfer the rote of the US military to an unaccountable world government system. The global control grid is moving beyond US/UK Anglo American hegemony into a paradigm even more out of reach from the common people. Regional governments are the bricks in the New World Order global government which is why the EU is creating its own military and the UK is funding it despite the Brexit vote. Except perhaps N. Korea, ALL nations are coming under the NWO, most easily tracked through UN Agenda 2030 which contains the entire map or blueprint. 