US Government Can Legally Access Your Facebook Data And Now We Know HowBy Alice Salles According to Facebooks Global Government Requests Report, governments requests for Facebook account data rose 27 percent in the first half of 2016. Facebooks official announcement explained that requests for user data went from 46,710 in the last half of 2015 to 59,229 in the first half of 2016. At least 56 percent of these requests, Facebook added, contained a non-disclosure order that prohibited us from notifying the user. Law enforcement agencies from across the globe, Facebook continued, often send restriction requests demanding Facebook remove content from its forums. Fortunately, these requests dropped substantially this year, from 55,827 in the last half of 2015 to 9,663 in 2016 an 87 percent drop. Most of the 2015 requests revolved around French content restrictions of a single image from the November 13, 2015 terrorist attacks. Additionally, Facebook used its report to disclose for the first time what the company does when law enforcement agencies request snapshots of a user account that might be relevant to law enforcement for undisclosed reasons. These preservation requests, as they are known, are requests to preserve data pending receipt of formal legal process. They are often processed by the social media website as snapshots, which are preserved temporarily. According to Facebook, the company does not disclose any of the preserved records unless and until we receive formal and valid legal process. In the first half of 2016, Facebook received 38,675 preservation requests regarding 67,129 accounts, a staggering number of requests. Further, Facebook insisted it does not give law enforcement any back doors to user information. Adding that requests are only fulfilled if they meet legal requirements or legal sufficiency, as Facebook puts it, they claim to apply a rigorous approach to every government request [they] receive to protect the information of the people who use [their] services, the company added. But this rigorous approach is not rigorous enough if reforms designed to avoid privacy overreach in America simply dont go far enough. Take the USA Freedom Act, for instance. The 2015 law was once supported by libertarian-leaning congressmen like Rep. Justin Amash (R-MI). Later, however, Amash criticized the bill after changes giving government more power were adopted. Mentioning the new rule by name, Facebook added that as a result of transparency reforms introduced this year by the USA Freedom Act, our report also contains additional information concerning National Security Letters (NSLs). NSLs are extraordinary search procedures that give the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) the power to compel the disclosure of customer records held by banks, telephone companies, Internet Service Providers, and others. They are extraordinary because detailed information can be surrendered without proper oversight, an issue that has led to countless cases of abuse. While NSLs are still being implemented, the gag order related to the procedure has changed. Now, the government goes to court to justify the gag order only if an NSL recipient notifies the FBI of its desire for judicial review in the first place. While the government bears the burden of immediately going to court and proving its necessity, NSLs give the FBI the power to bypass this important step. Explaining that the government lifted a gag requirement on one NSL issued in the second half of 2015, the company decided to publish it. Its unclear sure how many other NSLs Facebook has received. Facebook may promise to apply a rigorous approach to every government request that comes its way, but rigor may only be practiced within the boundaries of U.S. law. If the law fails to protect the users privacy by allowing agencies to use extraordinary procedures, your data is never protected, no matter how well-meaning companies like Facebook claim to be. According to Facebook, other government requests concerning imminent risk of serious injury or death are also granted on a regular basis. At least 3,016 of these requests were made in the first half of 2016. They targeted 4,192 accounts. Search warrants were produced in only 13,742 cases of request for data while only 781 others were backed by court orders. This article (US Government Can Legally Access Your Facebook Data and Now We Know How) is free and open source. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Alice Salles and theAntiMedia.org. Anti-Media Radio airs weeknights at 11 pm Eastern/8 pm Pacific. If you spot a typo, please email the error and name of the article to edits@theantimedia.org. Image Credit: Anthony Freda Art My Facebook Account was hacked and information altered on it with phone security text messaging that did no good. The government can hack anything people do online and alter it, and isnt afraid to prove it either. My Facebook account never existed cuz I never signed up!! Id be careful if I were you. This probably puts you under extreme suspicion as a domestic extremist according to the FBI Paranoid Fantasy Play Book. Yes indeed. I must be up to something!! . no matter how well-meaning companies like Facebook claim to be. What LaLa planet is this statement coming from? Can we stop pretending Facebook is anything but a data collecting arm of the government? Its not like we havent known this for about ten years now. Fakebook was censoring me 8 years ago. It took almost 2 years to get out that web. Easy to get in, next to impossible to get out. Same with screwtube! Except they just kept locking me out of my channels. Now on screwtube you cant go two minutes with out an ad cutting in in mid sentence. Screw you both! The advances of the present, 