Is China Sending Troops To Syria?By Brandon Turbeville On September 23, Leith Fadel of Almasdar News (the Arab Source), reported that China has now decided to commit troops and military aircraft to Syria within the next six weeks. Although the reports have not been independently confirmed, the outlet cited a senior Syrian officer in the Syrian military for the claims regarding the Chinese plans. Fadels information has proven accurate many times in the past. Fadel writes, On Tuesday morning, a Chinese naval vessel reportedly traveled through Egypts Suez Canal to enter the Mediterranean Sea; its destination was not confirmed. However, according to a senior officer in the Syrian Arab Army (SAA) that is stationed inside the Syrian coastal city of Latakia, Chinese military personnel and aerial assets are scheduled to arrive in the coming weeks (6 weeks) to the port-city of Tartous he could not provide anymore detail. Russia has made it abundantly clear that they are taking an active role in this conflict, but the news of the Chinese military to Syria provides more insight into their contingency. It is without doubt that, if Assad were to ask China to engage ISIS in Syria, the Asian powerhouse would be well within its rights under international law to do just that since Assad is the internationally recognized government of Syria and China would have been invited to enter the country militarily. There is clearly a mutual threat shared between Syria and China with both countries under attack from Uyghur terrorists who are typically controlled by Turkish and Western intelligence. Chinas growing Uyghur separatists movement in Xinjang, recent bombings in Thailand attributed to Turkeys Uyghur Grey Wolves, and Turkistan Islamic Party/Army of Conquest Turkish-backed terrorists at work in Syria assisting in the supplying Chinese Uyghur terrorists with fake passports and engaging in terrorist/military operations against the Syrian government, all represent a threat that exists both to the existence of the Assad government in Syria and the government in China. As Christina Lin writes for the Times of Israel, Some pundits may point to Chinas non-interference principle as an impasse to action. However, Chinas non-interference principle is more in reference to meddling in other countries domestics politics, such as US/western penchant for intervention and violating other countries sovereignty to overthrow autocratic regimes they dislike. Non-interference policy does not mean inaction when Chinas security and interests are threatened. It is not difficult for China to take action when its core interests are threatenedthat means violation of its sovereignty, territorial integrity, economic development and regime survival. At the 2011 IISS Asia Security Summit, Chinese Defense Minister Liang Guanglie spelled out Chinas core interests as the following: The core interests include anything related to sovereignty, stability and form of government. China is now pursuing socialism. If there is any attempt to reject this path, it will touch upon Chinas core interests. Or, if there is any attempt to encourage any part of China to secede, that also touches upon Chinas core interests related to our land, sea or air. Then, anything that is related to Chinas national economic and social development also touches upon China core interests. If the TIP continues to gain power within the Army of Conquest that is a jihadi witches brew of various al Qaeda affiliates and alafist extremists, Xinjiang may become the next Afghanistan and follow the pattern of Afpak, Syria/Iraq, with local militant forces/cross border havens attracting foreign fighters, and enjoying material and diplomatic support from Turkey and other outside powers with shared ideology/interests. sMoreover, the Assad regime is currently still the legal and UN-recognized government of Syria, despite only holding 1/3 of its territory. If Assad asks and gives permission for Russia, China and other SCO members to assist him militarily, that would be in accordance with international law. This differs from the current US-led anti-ISIS coalition airstrikes in Syria that is neither operating under a UN mandate nor permission from the sovereign government, although it enjoys implicit permission to some extent from the Assad regime to fight ISIS. Lin also notes: With Erdogan waging an Islamist proxy war on China, Kurds, Assad, Sisi, Netanyahu via Al Qaeda affiliates, Army of Conquest, Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, it is no wonder Syria and Egypt both applied to join the China-led SCO in June this year. Thus Syria and China both share threats from the Army of Conquest that is attacking Assad and Chinas Xinjiang. If Fadels report from Almasdar is accurate, then it is apparent that the Russia-China bloc is finally responding to the Western-backed terror threat that comes in many guises but is, in reality, merely a product of the NATO intelligence apparatus. In the meantime, while US forces finally receive some resistance to their meddling in Syria, the situation on the ground becomes more precarious for the worlds population by the day. It is time the American people begin to demand their government cease its support for terrorists in Syria and the rest of the world before it is too late. Image Credit Brandon Turbeville article archive here is an author out of Florence, South Carolina. He has a Bachelors Degree from Francis Marion University and is the author of six books, Codex Alimentarius The End of Health Freedom, 7 Real Conspiracies, Five Sense Solutions and Dispatches From a Dissident, volume 1 and volume 2, The Road to Damascus: The Anglo-American Assault on Syria, and The Difference it Makes: 36 Reasons Why Hillary Clinton Should Never Be President. Turbeville has published over 500 articles dealing on a wide variety of subjects including health, economics, government corruption, and civil liberties. Brandon Turbevilles podcast Truth on The Tracks can be found every Monday night 9 pm EST at UCYTV. He is available for radio and TV interviews. Please contact activistpost (at) gmail.com. This is great news; however, you stated that It is time the American people begin to demand their government cease its support for terrorists in Syria and the rest of the world before it is too late. I dont believe for one second that if the whole population of the United States were to stand up to this Federal Government, per se, that it would cause any reverse reactions. Like George Carlin once said, They have their own club and were not in it. There will only be one way to take back our high-jacked government, by force James Corbetts brilliant podcast on China and The NWO convincingly made the case modern day China is entirely a global elite construct. Just as Antony Sutton showed the western plutocrats funded the rise of Hitler and the Bolsheviks (Russian Communists / Soviet Union), a similar pattern was used to build up modern day China. Its Brzezinskis baby as the famous quote goes a model Technocracy. If the primary goal of the creation of ISIS was to construct a bigger terrorist boogeyman to terrorize the entire world, then the entire world would have to respond and, viola, we have the rationale for a global military force and another step towards global governance. Several decades ago it was the Club of Rome that suggested a global nemesis was needed to unite the world (global governance) and environmental disaster of some kind should be considered. Now we have environmental issues, economic instability, and an engineered terrorism problem to get the job done. The orchestrated dramas are reaching a crescendo as the TPP is about to be passed and the pope makes his pronouncements at the UN summit. What a freakin nightmare. What a coincidence President Xi Jinping of China was just here, in D.C.. looking into the face of ISIS wined and dined by terrorists. Didnt seem to phase him one bit. 