No Real Limitations on Tasers Used for Minor Infractions or Just BecauseAmanda Warren It centers around Californian Gary Hesterberg jogging with his unleashed terrier which he then leashed. It ended with a National Park Service woman deploying taser barbs in his back and calling for backup. The twists and turns are well written in depth and are interesting. But Bottom line: he just barely won his case. BARELY. It really isnt encouraging. Ironically, it actually sets more uncomfortable precedents about the use of tasers by the National Park Service, especially if you read the entire thing. But the point is why should jogging with your obedient dog ever, ever land a taser in your face to begin with? Furthermore, something that never entered the case was that he informed the Park Service woman he had a heart problem, but she still shot him in the back. His charges were based on that little interaction, not the one where she originally saw his dog off a leash a minor infraction. Again, the dog was leashed at this point. She was only supposed to go out and give verbal warnings about it. But the paranoia and Hesterbergs mistrust that she wouldnt identify her authority led to a crazy tasing incident. Sheperceives more disobedience when he wont simply roll over after five seconds of a paralyzing jolt. She takes more action after kindly checking his vital signs. Speaking of which, often left from the argument of police shooting innocent Americans, is the use of deadly force with so-called non-lethal weapons like tasers. See Joe Wrights in-depth article on wrongful taser deaths here. Even NBC News asks: Are Tasers too deadly to be called non-lethal? Heres one statistic: The Taser delivers a paralyzing 50,000 volt shock to the body through metal probes attached to 21-foot wires that are fired from the Taser using a nitrogen propellant. When police fire the device, the probes penetrate the skin or up to 1 of clothing per probe to deliver a shock. (source) If you look at the video compilation on The Atlantic a startling yet not exhaustive one if youve been anywhere on YouTube in the last few years youll see that many of the officers are deploying the tasers multiple times, in one of them causing cardiac arrest. They are shooting people square in the chest or back. You dont really see pending threats in those videos, either. Either the person is already detained or is doing something that doesnt warrant a ticket. And that is the point stop cattle prodding people into submission. And stop cattle prodding after submission. After handcuffs. And maybe stop injuring (kicking, kicking, kicking) someone after they are paralyzed from shock. Imagine seeing someone shock their kids into submission for every disobeyed command. Yet, this is happening all too often to non-threatening adults. And the elderly, and pregnant women and children again, from law enforcement. Like this 10-year-old kid who didnt want to wash an officers car. Or this 10-year-old kid at day care. This guy was crying on the side of the road. This firefighter waved at a police officer who said he tased him because he thought the guy flipped him the bird. Oh, well in that case Im sorry, would even flipping the bird be considered a threat toanyone? Enough to warrant 50,000 volts of electricity? And tasers were intended to prevent the use of deadly force when theres a threat we see how that has turned out. Statistics for American deaths after getting shot by police have gone POOF! But to watch the news interview about a waving firefighter it becomes a he said, he said trying to figure out did he actually flip the bird? Did he?? Please Its really important to always bring back the frame of the argument to the use of weapons yes, deadly weapons on innocent people. And never by any means simply get used to it or rationalize the (irrational) reasoning behind it. Recently by Amanda Warren 