This December, Agenda 21 is Getting an UpdateBy Rusticus So, too, is this UN Convention in Paris a celebration of the Kyoto Protocols numerological accomplishments, as COP21/CPM11 marks the 11th year of the emission regulations force as International Law (as of 2004). The purpose of these festivities, however, is hardly mere ceremony; as Agenda 21 comes of age, the burdens it places upon those living beneath its yoke are also maturing. Unlike every UN Climate Convention since Rio 1992, which were mere global visioning seminars, COP21, according to the Anglo-American Cambridge University, has far more grandiose and binding aspirations: The United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 or CMP11 will be held in Paris, France in 2015. The international climate conference will be held from 30 November to 11 December 2015. The conference objective is to achieve a legally binding and universal agreement on climate, from all the nations of the world. Cambridge Interdisciplinary Research on the Environment In other words, Agenda 21 v2.0 will soon be upon us. Information on what exactly this upgrade entails for Free Humanity is sparse, as the UN remains resolutely vague (perhaps deliberately, given recent notoriety surrounding sustainable development) on the specifics of the Conventions binding and universal agreement. Yet in spite of Globalisms sincere attempt to obfuscate Neofeudal Technocracys latest iteration, open-source intelligence can give us a glimpse behind the proverbial curtain at the magic tricks in store at COP21 this December. All the Worlds a (Sustainable) Stage As the curtain begins to rise on Act 2 of Agenda 21, its worth reminding ourselves of the nodes of forensic history which lead to COP21. Perhaps the most integral of these nodes is the research produced by whistleblower and activist, George Washington Hunt, in his party-crashing exploits at the pre-Rio planning committees of the early-90s, attended by such Globalist luminaries as Maurice Strong and Edmond de Rothschild; all of whom were caught on tape by Hunts daring infiltration: Even more undercirculated than Hunts video presentation are the documents this Conference produced. It is within these Anglophilic pages that the World Order created by Agenda 21 is spelled out with stunning clarity particularly as it pertains to the developing world, China and India chief among them: China and India, recognizing the influence their signatures (or lack thereof) would have on adopting Agenda 21 globally, told the UN succinctly: We havent come here for aid (IMF loans). Instead, we want in on the Western game of Global Trade (Neomercantilism). Give us a slice of the wealth pie (compensatory financial flows) or were not signing up. History informs us, however, that China and India did sign up for Rios binding protocols. The past twenty-odd years also spell out quite clearly that the Anglo-American Establishment has fulfilled its side of the wager to her former colonies. This Faustian Bargain has made India and China rich, but at what cost? Was the price paid by India and China their economic autonomy? While its certain that the Indian caste system and the State Capitalist collectivism of modern China are hardly beacons of liberal free market activity, their development includes elements of this therein; in fact, Eastern banking systems grow more Anglo-Saxon in ideal and structure by the day, despite the facade of independence being maintained. This blend of Western structure with Eastern identity in banking strikes one as the potential compromise reached between the First and Second worlds at UNCED a final bid to maintain the Anglo-Saxon system of banking: The Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (or AIIB) is an excellent example of this burgeoning East-Anglo banking model. While widely reported by some as signifying the end of the decaying Western banking model, the AIIBs steadfast devotion to Agenda 21 makes one wonder whether or not the AIIB is a truly autonomous entity, or merely Chinas fulfillment of an Asian Development Bank or Development Bank of Latin America-style puppet as called for by Rio 92: It seems the AIIB plans not only on investing in green infrastructure projects, but will do so in partnership with the Globalist World Bank and ADB, both of which were set up by the West following the devastation of World War II. Christine Lagarde and the IMF, too, state that they would be Delighted to work with the AIIB. Is this new system of banking and financing what Edmond de Rothschild meant when he referenced a Second World Marshall Plan in relation to Agenda 21, as described in Hunts recording? Is this why developing nations should look to Germany and Japan, countries rebuilt by World Bank funding, for their banking models, as described in the UNCED document? One must bear in mind that the United Nations Council on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) quoted in the document above is the same group which authored the paper, A BRICS Development Bank A Dream Coming True? in March of 2014, which heralds the rise of the BRICS New Development Bank as a global force for sustainable development and an ardent partner in Agenda 21: And thus, a pattern emerges the New Kids on the Trading Bloc and their corresponding banks are, universally, in lock-step with Agenda 21 and the multipolar Technocratic Order it represents. From sustainable banking to metals exchanges, the infrastructure required by a reinvention of the Global Order seems to be in place in advance of COP21, with the exception of at least one key element: A global carbon credit scheme. Carbon Credits Cometh Much ado has been made recently within the alternative media about the IMFs decision to delay inclusion of the Yuan into the SDR basket until September of 2016, with various theories floated as to why this has occurred. Viewing this announcement within the context of COP21s heavy emphasis on the future of carbon trading markets, a piece of the Yuan-SDR puzzle falls into place; if what anti-Technocracy researchers like Patrick Wood have unveiled is true, Global Technocracys Neomalthusian environmental implements must also develop in tandem with a new currency system underpinned by energy credits. The pre-release documents from COP21s Scientific and Technological Advice PDF, as well as COP21s sponsors, hint at this being an integral part of the discussions taking place in December: One key country expected to be signatory to COP21s treaty has revealed that they are not yet ready for the new market-based mechanism the UN will require: China. The Chinese National Development and Reform Commission announced that their national carbon trading markets will not be ready until late 2016 at the earliest: So it seems the IMF has delayed the Yuans SDR inclusion for almost exactly as long as it will take for China to launch its national carbon trading scheme is this mere coincidence? The timing of these moves strikes this author as potentially significant. The launch of this national program will be built on the foundation of the regional carbon markets China has been fostering over the past few years, one of which should be familiar to us: The site of the Trilateral-assisted Eco-City, Tianjin, is also the site of Chinas pilot carbon trading market; the same Tianjin whose not-so-smart counterpart was recently set ablaze by a mysterious explosion, ostensibly caused by chemicals. If the problem of unsustainable manufacture and development wasnt clear to Chinas human resources before last week, it is now. Hegel 21 back then, we were talking about projections of a problem (Climate Change) with literally no solutions that we could talk about. And that is, for people, just not going to work. People need to know that theres hopefulness before theyre gonna even admit theres a problem. If you give them a problem and theres no solution, they pretend it doesnt happen. Weve been doing that for 25 or 30 years. What we see now is that we actually have solutions, and were actually being hit with the problem now. Gina McCarthy, EPA Administrator This is how the head of the EPA, Gina McCarthy, chose to frame the Obama Administrations implementation of the Malthusian Clean Power Plan during her tell-a-vision appearance with Bilderberger and CFR member Charlie Rose. Sound familiar? The Hegelian Dialectic strikes again, only this time, on a global stage. The mass of the public, properly conditioned to accept Climate Change as the Harbinger of Doom, is now prepared for the solutions phase of Eco-Fascism: The final round of de-industrialization and centralization of the American power grid. This latest Hegelian tricks synthesis, birthed from the antithesis represented by the EPAs slashing of American carbon emissions, must inevitably include the rapid development of American renewable power: Regardless of the winner of the 2016 Presidential (s)election, the mechanics for such a program are already well underway at the Corporatist level, as China, the largest solar panel producing country on Earth, is well underway in supplying American solar infrastructure: In the case of Sunivas purchase by Shunfeng Clean Energy, Chinas solar juggernaut worth over $20 billion, the merger will be underwritten by two powerful forces of Anglo-American wealth as well: The Warburg banking family and the ever-present Goldman Sachs are steadfast in their support of this sustainable trend. A safe bet, surely, as the Obama Administrations Clean Power Act virtually requires a tremendous uptick in solar panel manufacture for the West. COP21 is set to require even more. Will the cheap money for cheap goods and cheap precious metal for cheap bonds relationship between China and the West soon be joined by a carbon credits for cheap solar panels arrangement? As experts on the East-West Dialectic and originators of the term BRICs as early as 2003, Goldman seems to be betting that this is the case: One may recall a recent post, China 21: Anglo-American Sustainability in Asia, in which this author noted the Hegelian Dialectics use to usher survivors of Fukushima into Agenda 21 Smart Cities. We see these same Thesis, Antithesis, Synthesis tactics at work in the rubble of Tianjin. Whoever or whatever caused the Tianjin blast, whether or not this is a case of a synthetic event or simply a matter of never letting a good crisis go to waste, the reality of the situation is unchanged: The old Tianjin is in ruin, whereas Tianjin Eco-City, located outside of the blast radius, remains in tact with its scheduled completion in 2020 unhindered: In tandem with old Tianjins destruction, degradation of air quality is also being reported surrounding the blast site; air quality issues that, presumably, would not exist had Tianjin Eco-City been at full capacity and the environmental standards of COP21 been fully developed: Tianjin Eco-City, unlike its counterpart, already includes a greenhouse gas data interface, a trait shared by every Smart City on planet Earth. Nor would Tianjin Eco-Citys Eco-Industrial Park have allowed such volatile and unsustainable manufacturing to take place in the first place. This is the thesis as constructed in the Hegelian programming surrounding the Tianjin catastrophe. All thats left now is for transnational Technocrats to wait in anticipation for the ultimate synthesis to be unveiled this December at COP21, and given the grand overtures being prepared by all nations in advance of the Paris conference, the legally binding and universal agreement it will produce is set to be no less bombastic. The specifics of the threat posed by COP21 to Free Humanity can only be divined upon the gatherings close, but its overall aspirations are known to us. They are the same in 2015 at COP21 as they were at Rio in 1992; the same today as in 1972 with the Club of Romes publication of The Limits to Growth. Nothing short of global colonization by the Anglo-American Establishment, as admitted at UNCED 92: To the billions of Lilliputians of lesser race out there, myself included, we have been warned. The Hour is Late. Whether the Fabian degradation of freedom and prosperity continue their steady grind or the world is compelled by economic catastrophe into implementing Global Sustainability as foretold by Maurice Strong, the remainder of 2015 and 2016 are set to be a turbulent period in this ongoing Age of Transitions. Amidst the potential tumult that Act 2 of Agenda 21 and other geopolitical events may yield, just remember, Reader: You either learn your way towards writing your own script in life, or you unwittingly become an actor in someone elses script. John Taylor Gatto Image Credit Blogging under the pseudonym of Rusticus, the author and freedom activist operates a website tracing the machinations of the Anglo-American Establishment throughout history while simultaneously documenting the process of creating a truly off-grid homestead. (www.statelesshomesteading.com) A blueprint for Global enslavementAgenda21! Its also a good time to update your 2nd Amendment collection. Thats the only thing which will ultimately stop Agenda 21. The 1% will control all global resources, surveil everyone, disappear dissenters, and live like Gods. They will decide which of the worker bees will live or die, and they are using many avenues to achieve their goalsincluding the green movement and environmentalists. Read Rosa Koires book Behind the Green Mask. She lays out the entire scheme very well. So if we listen to the nuts that say C02 is a problem or carbon is a problem at what point do they think we will stop having rain snow storms or anything else??? I can tell you and that answer is NEVER it is a ponzi scheme and we are the ones being had, They will never be happy until American is not even a third world country we have to be in the stone age to pay for all we have done. I SAY SCREW THEM.. Bunch of nuts Thanks, great research. 