Inventing viruses: a staggering hoaxI have many reasons for exposing hoaxes about viruses. One vital reason: when people realize the truth, they begin to grasp, at a visceral level, whats possible in the area of fake-reality invention. They see their own prior assumptions go whirling down the drain. They see how many pancakes of propaganda can be stacked up on one plate. The virus hoax cuts very, very deep, all the way down into what people automatically accept as Obvious. It isnt obvious at all. Its a complete fabrication. Its an artifact made out of nothing. (The Underground, Jon Rappoport) Reader, were moving into deep waters now. This isnt just about Ebola. This is about the whole structure of false medical reality. And that reality begins with the arrogant assurance that whats killing very large numbers of people can be traced to a virus. The experts present a unified front. They assert that their tests for these viruses are correct, pure, and extremely useful. Yes, the tests are useful to the pharmaceutical companies who make the drugs that purport to kill the viruses and the vaccines that purport to give immunity to the viruses. But as Ive shown in prior articles, these tests (antibody, PCR) are far from accurate. Worse, theyre irrelevant. And they mask the fact that actual isolation of the virus from the human body is not being done. Several readers have asked me what isolation of a virus means. The most obvious answer is: you know youre looking at virus, rather than something else. For example, you remove diseased tissue from a human being, and from it you separate out probable virus from non-viral material, and you then take electron microscope pictures of the probable, and you look at those picture, and you see lots and lots of the same virus. Not what could be or might be virus, but definitely virus. This is direct. This is virus from a human. This is not indirect testing that is faulty, irrelevant, and can go wrong in many ways. Isolation is what you need to begin to say a virus could be causing a disease. Peter Doshi,Influenza: marketing vaccines by marketing disease, (BMJ 2013; 346:f3037): Translation: 84% of what is considered to be flu isnt flu. Every year. The flu virus isnt there. Heres another Doshi referenceDecember, 2005, the BMJ Online,Are US flu death figures more PR than science? (BMJ 2005; 331:1412): Thats 18. At various times, the CDC has stated that, every year, 36,000 Americans die from the fluor, after revising that estimate, the CDC states it could be anywhere from 3000 to 49,000. But only 18 patients blood samples showed any sign of the presence of the flu virus. Meanwhile, other researchers found out Pellagra was mainly a deficiency of niacin. They were pushed into the background. A bunch of fools. Pay no attention to them. Finally, after 100,000 deaths, most of which were unnecessary, the experts grudgingly admitted, Yes, its niacin. Researchers were told to look for a virus. So they did. And did. And did. It had to be a virus. Against much opposition, a small group of investigators and lawyers publicly proposed a different answer. SMON was the result of a drug Ciba-Geigy was selling to alleviate gastrointestinal distress. The drug was Clioquinol. Finally exposed in court, Ciba paid out large $ damages. It wasnt a virus. Even though everybody thought it was. Knew it was. Plummer stated, we are finding some of the best-characterized [SARS disease] cases are negative [for the SARS virus]. So its puzzling. As is the fact the amounts of virus we are finding, when we find it, are very smallonly detectable by very sensitive PCR [testing]. Even when the so-called cause of SARS was found in patients, the amount was so small there was no way to say it would create disease. Plummer eventually admitted that the percentage of SARS cases in which the virus was present was approaching zero. Translation: the viral cause of SARS couldnt be the cause. Here is a brief edited excerptthe entire interview is published at primitivism.com: CJ [Christine Johnson]: Does HIV cause AIDS? EPE [Papadopulos]: There is no proof that HIV causes AIDS. CJ: Why not? EPE: For many reasons, but most importantly, because there is no proof that HIV exists. CJ: Didnt Luc Montagnier and Robert Gallo isolate HIV back in the early eighties? EPE: No. In the papers published in Science by those two research groups, there is no proof of the isolation of a retrovirus from AIDS patients CJ: They say they did isolate a virus. EPE: Our interpretation of the data differsTo prove the existence of a virus you need to do three things. First, culture cells and find a particle you think might be a virus. Obviously, at the very least, that particle should look like a virus. Second, you have to devise a method to get that particle on its own so you can take it to pieces and analyze precisely what makes it up. Then you need to prove the particle can make faithful copies of itself. In other words, that it can replicate. CJ: Cant you just look down a microscope and say theres a virus in the cultures? EPE: No, you cant. Not all particles that look like viruses are viruses. CJ: So where did AIDS research go wrong? EPE: Its not so much a question of where the research went wrong. Its more a question of what was left out. For some unknown reason the decades-old method of retroviral isolationdeveloped to study animal retroviruses was not followed. Retroviruses are incredibly tiny, almost spherical particles with diameters of about one hundred nanometers (one ten-thousandth of a millimeter). Millions would fit comfortably on the head of a pin. CJ: What do we see in [electron microscope pictures of HIV] published in 1997? EPE: These photographs vindicate the position we have held ever since the beginning. Two groups, one Franco/Germanand one from the US National Cancer Institutepublished picturesThe first thing to say is that the authors of these studies concede that their pictures reveal that the vast majority of the materialis cellular. The authors describe all this material as non-viral, or as mock virus or microvesicles, which are encapsulated cell fragments. CJ: Are there any viral particles in these pictures? EPE: There are a few particles which the researchers claim are retroviral particles. In fact, they claim these are the HIV particles, but give no evidence why. CJ: Are there lots of these HIV particles? EPE: Nowhen you take an electron micrograph they [HIV particles] should fill the entire picture. Instead, these candidate retroviruses are minority constituents of the published electron micrographs. Thus, molecules extracted from these samples can not be assumed to come from those retroviral-like particles. end of interview excerpt I recently had an exchange of emails with David Rasnick, PhD. The subject of our conversation was the isolation of the Ebola virus from humans. Has it ever been done? Direct isolation is far different from diagnostic tests such as antibody or PCR, which are both indirect methods of assessment. In previous articles, Ive covered the irrelevance of these two tests. Any discussion of the Ebola virus must begin with the question of direct isolation. The whole presumption of an Ebola outbreak and epidemic rests on that question. Was the Ebola virus ever purified and isolated from a human? Here is what Rasnick wrote, after his search of the published literature: I searched the CDCs website and came up dry. The CDC claims 7728 Ebola virus cases have been laboratory-confirmed. I asked the CDC what constitutes isolation of Ebola virus from human specimens. I also asked for the protocol for isolating Ebola virus. [No convincing reply from the CDC as of this date.] Virtually everything that is known and done with these viruses is in animals and cell culture. Rasnick continued: Viruses causing real pathology are abundant in the diseased tissues. You can see them using EM on the primary tissue. You do not need to amplify the virus in cell culture. Im always suspicious when cell culture is the only way a virus is observable by EM. Rasnicks findings are a direct challenge to the basis of the whole Ebola outbreak. If indeed the Ebola virus has never been isolated from a human being, the so-called epidemic is unproven. To say this is shocking would be a vast understatement. When public-health officials and governments claim there is an epidemic, the burden of proof is on them. At this point, they must, first and foremost, show someone, somewhere, correctly and directly and undeniably isolated Ebola virus from a human being. Lets see the evidence. In past articles, Ive demonstrated how people could become ill from factors other than virusesfactors which are ignored and even maintained, in order to keep populations in a debilitated state, unable to resist their political leaders and corporations intent on taking over land and resources. Add to that, attributing fake viral causes to illness also opens the gate wide to the products of Big Pharmatoxic medical drugs and vaccines. These fake viral outbreaks and epidemics also serve to keep populations in fear, at which point they look to their leaders to tell them what to do. This is programming for compliance. One aspect of studying the matrix called civilization involves unearthing the most basic assumptions which people acceptassumptions they couldnt possibly believe are false, much less intentionally false. The analysis Im presenting here is one corner on one street in a massive city-labyrinth called Matrix. (For more information on analyzing and deconstructing false realities, see Analyzing Information in the Age of Disinformation inPower Outside The Matrix.) (To read about Jons mega-collection, Power Outside The Matrix,click here.) The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here. In past articles, Ive demonstrated how people could become ill from factors other than virusesfactors which are ignored and even maintained, in order to keep populations in a debilitated state, unable to resist their political leaders and corporations intent on taking over land and resources. This is also applied with the military-industrial-complex. Would hazard it is likely used within economics as well and in religion for sure, all religions with none any more so than another. Easy enough to see it for what it is once a person starts to have a sense of detachment of most of it. It is a giant net and chain to bind and enslave. Not sure if it was Plato or Socrates what said all forms of governing had been tried, all had failed. Seems they were clued into something. Why can we not learn? For the last two weeks California has been aerially sprayed with substances not part of the chemtrail geoengineered drought making people sick for the purpose of keeping California in a debilitated state, unable to resist brownie bob and his corporations intent on taking over land and resource by destroying the population and burning down the state. Its a complete fabrication. Its an artifact made out of nothing The article at http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/ciencia_virus01.htm explains a pathogen that has been associated with ten major illness diagnoses. The pathogen was intentionally created. Consent must be required for any vaccine or drug. That is a basic human right. Corporate interests have lead to controversial and dangerous vaccines and drugs. The drug Vioxx caused tens of thousands of deaths. The highly deadly mandatory clot-buster TPA drug given in the ER for a non-life threatening moderate ischemic stroke has a history of deadly failed test trials and controversial if any benefit modest benefit. This stealth euthanasia drug is now starting to be delievered to homes after the 911 call. Search: AAEM TPA position, The NNT TPA stroke, or in emergency medicine blogs or http://www.stroketreatmentrisktpa.co.nf for the stroke TPA drug controversy. 