6 Falsehoods Making Up Agenda 21By Paul A. Philips The strong push for these hidden international agendas from NGOs (non-governmental organizations), federal agents and various planning groups have caused targeted local government elected representatives to give in to the demands and approve legislation. The local elected representatives may be nonplussed over why theres such a demand for approval: Dont question anything, just do as we say theyre basically told. Finally giving their approval to what they see as local concerns only, they may be clueless about the hidden intentions behind these international enslavement agendas and the consequences. These disturbing agendas are based on a number of falsehoods. So, in light of this, here are 6 falsehoods exposing dot-connecting issues making up the Agenda 21 and sustainable development. A major motivating factor behind Agenda 21 and the justification for sustainable policy is the claim that there is a world overpopulation crisis. In spite of all the fear mongering this is not the case. For example, in developed countries populations have in fact decreased. However, the policy makers of Agenda 21 rail against anyone disputing this. They factor in the recent influx of immigrants (legal or illegal) as in the case of the USA. Indeed, this is not a world population increase, but merely a number of people whove moved from one place to another through deliberately manufactured open border immigration policy to justify Agenda 21 and its plans to concentrate the resultant overpopulation into small confined areas. With the populace concentrated in these confined areas its easier to control them. They will have their national identity/sovereignty wiped out. Then theres the population reduction schemes having brutal policies based on the overpopulation myth. In China weve seen forced sterilization and abortions. To get some idea that these population reduction policies are for real, and in Agenda 21 policy, here are a few quotes from the Sustainablists: A total world population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal. CNN Founder Ted Turner Childbearing should be a punishable crime against society, unless the parents hold a government license. All potential parents should be required to use contraceptive chemicals, the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for childbearing. David Brower (Sierra Club) In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation. Prince Phillip (husband of Queen Elizabeth II and co-founder of the World Wildlife Fund) Well over 30,000 scientists have signed a petition saying there is no climate change. Around 50% of meteorologists have also expressed their dissension In spite of all the evidence going against the climate change claim proponents have become near-hysterical in their rally for implementing related policy. As part of an attack on those disagreeing with climate change, the US Justice Department recently wanted to take action on deniers. Even those questioning have been attacked. Why dont these authorities rub a few brain cells of investigation together and find out that the science is, at best, far from sound? Its because theyre not interested in the truth: The official line, the claim that climate change is proof of how humankind is destroying the planet through greenhouse gas overproduction has to be accepted en masse regardless of the truth. Proponents know that acceptance of the official line is crucial for Agenda 21 and its related policies to continue. Threats, cover-ups and lies proponents will do anything to keep us pinned to the wall, accepting climate change. Controlling energy through smart meter installation, less car usage, costly bike pathways and rail systems etc., its all based on the climate change sustainable policy hoax. A handful of those proponents just happened to have made huge amounts of money implementing this. Agenda 21 reform is a gross top-down controlling, oppressive system, treating people like sheep needing to be shepherded from pen to pen, not taking into account their individuality. Proponents know that it is necessary to start indoctrinating the populace at a very early to get used to it. So children are being indoctrinated to grow up into the Agenda 21 reform through Common Core education, which is nothing more than a dumbing-down programme designed to socially engineer them into acceptance and passivity and not think critically. Jobs will be selected for them, care of these indoctrination/training schools. They will have attitudes and values different to their parents to forcibly become global citizens in a global economy for Agenda 21 sustainable development. Youve heard it said in mainstream media. The likes of Hollywood stars are saying it; its no coincidence that in recent times, more publicity has been given to those speaking out about the evils of the free market system. This increased publicity has been deliberately orchestrated. Proponents of Agenda 21 want the masses to accept the idea that the free market is a corrupt evil system where the rich exploit the poor. Thats because they have hidden ulterior motives to do with economic policy (redistribution of wealth) and protecting the environment. Consistent with sustainable development, whether its the UN or Obama administration there is a push towards a zero economic growth policy. This means manufacturing industries will be forced to shut down, finding it too difficult to operate. New industries will find it virtually impossible to start a business. For instance, in the case of the USA, the lap dog for Agenda 21 proponents, to see that this happens, is the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The EPA has closed down whole industries such as the coal industry. Also, other closed down industries include timber, road building and dams using the paltry excuse each time that theyre doing it to protect the environment. How can there be a growth in the economy when all these industries are disappearing? Agenda 21 proponents dont want growth. They want to maintain the current status quo. This will greatly reduce resources, leading to the formation of a Hunger Games Society where people will be living at settlement zones in abject poverty. My three main goals would be to reduce human population to about 100 million worldwide, destroy the industrial infrastructure and see wilderness, with its full complement of species, returning throughout the world. Dave Foreman, co-founder of Earth First! Isnt the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isnt it our responsibility to bring that about? Maurice Strong, founder of the UN Environment Programme The term Sustainable Developmentis a euphemism for private property land grabbing while Sustainable Medicine is in effect a body grab. Visioning councils will determine what shall be done with the health of each individual in their settlement zones. No individual will have any choice other than to follow the health directives given to them by the councils. Essentially, low-key health technology will be used to only treat symptoms, causing the illness to return in line with Agenda 21, sustainable medicine is in effect a plan for a population reduction. While this is already being implemented, local governmental officials are giving it their approval because theyre practically clueless about the big picture and how its a growing health- and freedom-eroding monster. I would recommend looking at the late Dr Madeleine Cosmans Sustainable Medicine +Sustainable Development = Duty to Die and Dr Sarah Myhills Sustainable Medicine Whistle-blowing on 21st century medical practice In these tough economic times the idea of preventing cheap energy seems crazy, until you see the ulterior motive: governments shell out a ton of money on alternative energy like solar power and wind when it only meets a small percentage of our requirements. They use the excuse that this is a necessary replacement for CO2 emitting, global warming conventional forms (which, to remind you, is based on a hoax). Obama signed an Executive Order, preventing the offshore drilling for oil. Taxes are forever increasing on conventional energies. All this goes beyond protecting the environment. Its done to create harmonization into the extreme Socialist sustainable stranglehold. Agenda 21 (or the on steroids new version: Agenda 2030) is nothing more than a quest for the actualization of a New World Order global fascist totalitarian state based on multiple false pretexts to create a massive population reduction, where a small handful get extremely wealthy, while the rest live in abject poverty using environmental protection as an excuse. People, are you going to stand for this monumental deception? Image Credit: Anthony Freda Art You can read more from Paul A. Philips at his site NewParadigm.ws The UN was a Rockefeller, et al, scheme to control the world at the Avenue of the Americas. They did not figure on Russia and others stuffing the ballot box with tin pot dictators to skew the decisions in the favor of the Left. Now we have a Muslim dominated world organization with no good coming to us and the rest of the developed world. Trump should give them 2 years to relocate to The Hague or similar and they can have their silly rule making where the impact will be felt firstthe EU. You may be correct about Agenda 21 but you use hyperbole when discussing some of the salient points of the Agenda. Climate change for instance is real as evidenced by numerous scientists and factual changes experienced by all. No need to consider conspiracy theories, no need at all! Wheres the hyperbole? Climate change, whether its a natural phenomenon reflecting the earths climate cycles or engineering via chemtrails, and possibly a contributing factor from human activities (anthropogenic) the latter of which, btw, is due to TPTBs deliberate hyperconsumption paradigm they have been stoking for decades or a combination of all three factors, is being used as an excuse to put us all into tiny cages, electronic straight jackets in a fascist top-down controlled society. The Establishment official hard line stance on anthropogenic climate change is one of the biggest house of cards ever built given the models dont factor in geoengineering. That alone is a massive red flag and several climate scientists as well as eminent scientists from other fields who have studied the basic design flaw of the models omitting important variables have publicly stated it is a sham. Archie1954 take a look at the skies purdy much any time of day or night and they will be full of criss crosses that spread. Full of harmful crap that the weather inducing machines (haarp/gwen) need to change the weather patters. Odd how Al the sky is falling Gore seemed to come out with his dog and pony false baloney show. Agenda 2030 is building a ton of box apartments around here. They sure dont want any one owning anything. Very true, TPTB dont want us to own our homes clearly stated in Agenda 21 documents: the plan to eliminate all private property. Its also discussed in the taped recordings of a physician who attended a presentation in 1969 given by another physician (an elite minion affiliated with Planned Parenthood) to a room of docs in which he spilled the beans about the long term plans for the restructuring of society under a NWO gov. The tapes have been around for a long time and Zen G. recently posted it as a reminder. I highly recommend a quick scan of a copy of the transcript, it also includes the minion doc speaking about plans to control the weather back in 1969. What section of Agenda 21 calls for the elimination of private property? In a list of unsustainable items on the UNs Biodiversity Assessment Report single family homes are listed. Four years ago in a presentation with several speakers, a California activist showed the audience a list of items from a UN/ICLEI Sustainability brochure and private property was on the list of unsustainable practices. From a 1976 UN Habitat report: Land cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market. Private land ownership is also a principal instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth, therefore contributes to social injustice. Individual rights will have to take a back seat to the collective. Harvey Ruvin, ICLEI. There are presentations on YT that deconstruct ICLEI, sustainability, and smart growth top down regulations at the county and state levels, e.g. Mimi Steel of President of SFBay CAPR (Citizens Alliance for Property Rights). Ties back into the rise of technocracy Is that even in Agenda 21? It just sounds like a less eloquent version of Thomas Paines writings on property tax and inheritance tax. Yes, it is in Agenda 21 and UN proposals. There are mountains of white papers that long time A21 activists such as Rosa Koire and a variety of writers publishing here on selfnews Post over the years have uncovered that reveal the long term plans of Agendas 21 and 2030 under the Sustainability umbrella of organizations such as ICLEI. What do you know about the extensive work of ICLEI? Its about restricting true ownership in favor of collectivism and communitarianism. None of those things are in Agenda 21. You are completely mistaken. You never answered the question about what you know regarding ICLEI and the Sustainability policy papers. Sometimes you need to connect the dots as has Koire and many others who have published books on Agenda 21 policies. Ill be asking the questions here. How do you feel about law against burning tires in your own yard? You know thats illegal, right? A man cant burn his own tires in his own yard. How is that any kind of freedom? We might as well just hand our keys over to the state right now. Either you have a great sense or humor or (?) .but then, it was a waste of time if the points about incrementalism, sophistry, and layered mechanisms to create new legal constructs were missed. A little from column A and a little from column B. You know the old story about a frog staying in a pot of water as you slowly heat it to a boil? Turns out real frogs dont do that. I dont think metaphorical frogs do, either. History proves otherwise. There are great parallels of the two extremes in the evolution of species, punctuated equilibrium and gradualism, and evolutionary biologist commonly observe both. Bill Gates Definitely put his money where his mouth is. Look up what his Bill Melinda Gates Foundation their vaccines have done for 10s of thousands of people in Africa. All dead or sterile, little to no media coverage. All from the geeky High school kid who brought you Windows. The UN headquarters building is the perfect location for a new Trump hotel. It has a terrific view of the East River. Hotel? Just build a wall around it and call it a prison. Thats what GITMOs for. These points are saliant and poignant spot on. Iceland the zentral (zioinsts banks) 