The Three Ugly Sisters: TTIP, CETA and TISABy Julian Rose The designers of the trade agreements claim that they will bring greater GDP and more jobs at both ends; a view which has been widely challenged by those likely to be on the receiving end. So lets spell it out: TTIP stands for Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership. Its the big brother brokering of new trade deals between The USA and the European Union. CETA stands for Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement. It is pretty much the same deal, but is being brokered by Canada and the European Union. And lastly theres TISA: Trade in Services Agreement, also involving the USA and EU, with some other Countries also in on the act. Here, it is services that are under the spotlight. Now common to all these is the fact that we the people are being kept entirely out of the picture. All negotiations are being hidden from public scrutiny, with special secret courts being established in off-shore venues, where national governments can be sued, if deemed to be protecting the right to prohibit certain imports or maintain trade tariffs. For example, the majority of Countries in the EU do not allow most varieties of genetically modified seeds and plants which the US seeks to export. This would raise an immediate dispute under the protocol of TTIP. Such a position will be re-scrutinized under the terms of these new trade agreements. US hormone enriched beef and chlorine washed chickens are another example of products currently blocked by the EU, and for good reason. There are many such controversies which all find their place as part of a negotiating time table designed to get a comprehensive new trade package into law as soon as possible, with no parliamentary intervention and, therefore, no public vote. Pause for breath.. Just what is going on here? Lets call a spade a spade: its a massive and fraudulent attempt by multinational corporations to wrest a further degree of control over global trading, thereby undermining the ability of Nation States to operate their own trading laws, enabling a wide range of business enterprises to function in relatively stable and competitive environments. TTIP, CETA and TISA can, for the sake of this summary, all be seen through the same lens. In each case, multinationals extensive role in creating new regulations, opens the door for setting in motion a race to the bottom in standards of quality set for foods, the environment and public services. In the case of TISA, governments are being pushed into accepting a mandatory privatization of public services. An overt way of giving big business the say so in all matters of public interest. In the UK, the national health service would be particularly vulnerable. But so would thousands of government backed, or supported, social enterprises throughout Europe. Under TTIP/CETA we would see the end of such individual delights as the Cumberland sausage and the Cornish pasty. The Parmigiano Reggiano, Black Forest Gateaux and Alsace Grand Cru. No domain names would be allowed in this free trade free-for-all. Fighting to save these products is slated to be a major uphill task. The defenders would need to familiarize themselves with ISDS, Investor State Dispute Settlement procedures. Procedures which could be heard in normal courts of law, but under TTIP are slated to be heard by a jury composed of corporate trained lawyers and specialist international experts, deliberating their cases in secret courts. In other words, a neat bypassing of any recognised legal system. A complete scam by any standards. The TTIP negotiating process has been ongoing for a number of years now. However, it is presently bogged down by disputes at both ends and looks close to collapse. France has recently called for an end to negotiations and a dropping of the entire process. Other European Countries are joining this call, with Germanys economy minister, Sigmar Gabriel, stating The negotiations with the USA have de facto failed, even though nobody is really admitting it. CETA and TISA are still ongoing, with CETA being the closest to ratification by Canadian authorities. It will then move on for ratification to The Council of the European Union and European Parliament. It appears that this agreement contains less contentious trading terms, as France is broadly accepting the current outline. However, it still smacks of a regime that will go over the heads of the people and simply fuel the coffers of the most canny exploiters of the global marketplace. What both the EU and USA actually need is the antithesis of these monster free trade agreements. They need to reinvest in local and regional forms of production and consumption, carried out on a genuine human scale. Work as though people mattered. We have seen quite enough destruction at the hands of multinational and transnational corporations busting their way into foreign countries and ruining their internal trading patterns. In the end its just another type of war. Who needs it. The planet is already saturated with irrational violence. This article first appeared in www.connorpost.com Julian Rose is an early pioneer of UK organic farming, an international activist, holistic thinker and writer. He is President of The International Coalition to Protect the Polish Countryside, and is the author of two books with some very powerful perspectives: Changing Course for Life and In Defence of Life. 