Study Proves Electromagnetic Fields from Cell Towers Can Amplify PainBy Alex Pietrowski It turns out that electromagnetic signals from cell phone towers do in fact directly affect the human body in physical ways, and surprisingly, for amputees, common cellular signals can amplify sensations of pain in the body, when in the presence of such emissions. A recently completed study led by members The University of Texas at Dallas gives concrete evidence that these types of now ubiquitous signals can actually amplify pain in some amputees by immediately stimulating nerve tissue that had suffered traumatic damage. Prior to this study, the bulk of research into cell tower radiation focused on people without any pre-existing conditions or serious health issues, however, when a disabled veteran who lost limbs in the Iraq war alerted his physicians to the fact that his sense of pain seemed to increase dramatically whenever his cell phone went into roaming mode, a study was launched to test this hypothesis on lab rats. Our study provides evidence, for the first time, that subjects exposed to cellphone towers at low, regular levels can actually perceive pain, said Dr. Mario Romero-Ortega, senior author of the study and an associate professor of bioengineering in the Universitys Erik Jonsson School of Engineering and Computer Science. Our study also points to a specific nerve pathway that may contribute to our main finding. [1] This is the first study of its kind that has found a direct link to immediate physical changes in the human body when absorbingcell tower radiation. Until a recent study led by researchers at The University of Texas at Dallas was published online last month in PLOS ONE, there was no scientific evidence to back up the anecdotal stories of people, such as Underwood, who reported aberrant sensations and neuropathic pain around cellphone towers and other technology that produce radio-frequency electromagnetic fields. [1] To validate the wounded soldiers claim that pain was amplified by cell tower signalsresearchers crafted a simulation using lab rats who were subjected to the types and levels of electromagnetic radiation that many of us are exposed to every day. To test this, the team randomly assigned 20 rats into two groups one receiving a nerve injury that simulated amputation, and the other group receiving a sham treatment. Researchers then exposed the subjects to a radiofrequency electromagnetic antenna for 10 minutes, once per week for eight weeks. The antenna delivered a power density equal to that measured at 39 meters from a local cellphone tower a power density that a person might encounter outside of occupational settings. Researchers found that by the fourth week, 88 percent of subjects in the nerve-injured group demonstrated a behavioral pain response, while only one subject in the sham group exhibited pain at a single time point, and that was during the first week. [1] These towers are being installed across the world right now, right amongst densely populated areas and even onpublic school grounds. Cell phones have already been proven to cause brain cancer, yet the both the cell industry and the general public refuse to consider this sufficient reason to re-think the use and widespread proliferation of this technology. Now that we have evidence that cell tower signals can amplify pain, is it that unreasonable to consider that cell tower radiation may be causing other health problems that we simply have yet to identify? Alex Pietrowski is an artist and writer concerned with preserving good health and the basic freedom to enjoy a healthy lifestyle. He is a staff writer for WakingTimes.com and Offgrid Outpost, a provider of storable food and emergency kits. Alex is an avid student of Yoga and life. Sources: [1]http://www.utdallas.edu/news/2016/2/3-31891_Study-Uncovers-How-Electromagnetic-Fields-Amplify-_story-wide.html This article (Study Proves Electromagnetic Fields from Cell Towers Can Amplify Pain) was originally created and published byWaking Timesand is published here under aCreative Commonslicense with attribution toAlex PietrowskiandWakingTimes.com. It may be re-posted freely with proper attribution, author bio, and this copyright statement. The research seems solid. I would be more convinced if test data was forwarded or provided in a reputable medical journal. Where has the study been published? The paper is fundamentally flawed in every respect, and a request to withdraw from PLOS ONE has been presented by several experts (see the PLOS ONE comment page on this publication). 