6 Points To Consider When Analyzing The Charlie Hebdo AttacksBrandon Turbeville The xenophobic pro-war right is predictably using the attack as an example of how all Muslims are terrorists and how their total annihilation and implementation of police state tactics are the only solution. On the one hand, the pathetic left-wing attempts to blame the victim for incitement and focuses on the need to become more politically correct, self-censoring, and linguistically minimal. The vast majority in the middle, however, believe the official mainstream version of events, quake in their boots, and move on to the next form of entertainment provided to them by the culture creators without a second thought. Yet, as is almost always the case, there is much more to the story than is being reported by mainstream outlets. There exist a number of questionable details regarding the Charlie Hebdo attack, as well as the relatively open control over terrorist groups and Islamic jihadists by the French intelligence apparatus, the US, and NATO. While random acts of violence certainly do occur some motivated by religious extremism and some not it is important to examine all of the facts surrounding these acts before coming to a judgment regarding the nature of them. We cannot simply engage in knee-jerk reactions labeling every act of violence as a false flag yet we cannot ignore the history of such acts and the prevalence of false flags in recent times. To be clear, this article is not attempting to definitively prove that the Charlie Hebdo attacks were false flags. It is, however, attempting to provide a brief collection of points that may shed light on the nature of those attacks and possible motivations for them that the mainstream media is largely refusing to cover. Below are 6 points that should be considered when analyzing the Charlie Hebdo attacks. 1.) Reports suggest the attackers acted as if they had military training. Reports are confirmed that the alleged assailants did receive military training in Syria. David Blair writes for the Telegraph They were also fully equipped for their murderous task. Photographs taken at the scene show two men clad entirely in black, their faces concealed by balaclavas. Each one is armed with an AK47 assault rifle. They wear army-style boots and have a military appearance and manner. One of the men wears a sand-colored ammunition vest apparently stuffed with spare magazines. Some reports suggest that an attacker was also carrying a rocket-propelled grenade launcher. Amateur footage shows them using classic infantry tactics. They move along the street outside the office working as a pair: one advances while the other gives cover. Instead of spraying automatic gunfire, they fire two aimed shots at each target a pattern known as double-tap firing thereby conserving their ammunition. The CIA and military-industrial complex connected security analysis organization, Stratfor, also suggested that the attackers were trained militarily. The organization based concluded this from the way they handled their weapons, moved and shot. These attackers conducted a successful attack, using what they knew, instead of attempting to conduct an attack beyond their capability, failing as a result. The attackers indeed received military training. They were fighters in Syria at one time as part of the jihadi proxy army of the United States, France, UK, and NATO. According to mainstream reports, the attackers spoke flawless, unaccented French, despite claims that they are members of the foreign Al-Qaeda in Yemen organization or the widespread belief that the attackers may have been fundamentalist immigrants. As CBS News reports, Corinne Rey, the cartoonist who said she was forced to let the gunmen in, said the men spoke fluent French and claimed to be from al Qaeda. In an interview with the newspaper lHumanite, she said the entire shooting lasted perhaps five minutes. Cherif Kouachi, one of the suspected attackers, was no stranger to French law enforcement. He was sentenced to three years imprisonment with 18 months suspended for terrorism charges in 2008 when was convicted of criminal association with a terrorist enterprise. Apparently, the group to which Cherif was affiliated, known as the 19th Arrondissement Network (named for the neighborhood it was based out of), was involved in recruiting French Muslims to fight for al-Qaeda in Iraq. As is typical in Western-backed terrorist operations, the group preyed on poor, disenchanted, struggling, and working-class young men. After procuring the necessary manpower, the group would then organize for weapons training and provide the necessary travel arrangements. Although convicted in 2008, police had arrested Cherif in 2005, just days before he planned to travel to Syria. Cherif fits the profile of a target for terrorist recruits. He was Muslim, had left school, and was working a dead-end job as a pizza delivery man. He was decidedly lower working class. The narrative now being constructed is that a gullible young man then fell under the spell of charismatic street preacher known as Farid Benyettou, who trolled the East Side of Paris. It is implied that Beneyettou, who was also convicted on terrorism charges, played a role in setting up Cherif with the terrorist organization he eventually joined and his subsequent travels to Syria to slaughter innocent people ultimately for the benefit of the geopolitical goals of NATO, France, and the United States. It should be noted that, during the course of the trial, Beneyettou was responsible for recruitment only. Out of the entire membership of his network, he was the only one not slated to travel to Iraq. Also noteworthy is the fact that, in 2005, it was revealed that some members of the 19th Arrondissement Network had affiliations with the ad-Dawa mosque,[1] one of the largest mosques in Paris. More importantly, all of the suspects were on the terrorist watch list of authorities long prior to their terrorist attack in Paris. 2.) The publication that was attacked has served to promote the strategy of tension in the past. Whether Charlie Hebdo was merely a media outlet who reveled in irreverence of Islam or whether it is something more sinister, the magazine is no stranger to controversy. As CBS News writes, Charlie Hebdo has been repeatedly threatened for its caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad and other sketches. Its offices were firebombed in 2011 after an issue featured a caricature of the prophet on its cover. Nearly a year later, the publication again published Muhammad caricatures, drawing denunciations from the Muslim world because Islam prohibits the publication of drawings of its founder. Another cartoon, released in this weeks issue and entitled Still No Attacks in France, had a caricature of a jihadi fighter saying Just wait we have until the end of January to present our New Years wishes. Charb was the artist. To be sure, the magazine has offended other religions and belief systems as well. However, it is interesting to note that, while the magazine and its editors have been allowed to continue operation despite the violent reactions its statements and cartoons have produced across the world as well as in France itself, some religions are apparently considered more equal than others. For instance, in 2009, an 80-year-old columnist for Charlie Hebdo was actually put on trial on charges of inciting racial hatred for making a joke that then-President Sarkozys son was converting to Judaism for financial gain. Indeed, even the act of denying the holocaust is a punishable thought crime in France. Despite the uber political correctness, however, France has allowed the magazine to continue lampooning Islam and Christianity, obviously acceptable targets of derision and abuse. Of course, religious organizations from both camps have responded with the traditional and typical response of fundamentalists the world over by attempting to stop the freedom of speech and expression of those not necessarily convinced by the arguments of the converted via the government apparatus and any other available means at their disposal. To be clear, however, while many Christians and Muslims likely detest the representation of their faith and religious symbols in such insulting ways, the overwhelming majority express their discontent in the same way by griping to their friends and family, turning on the game, and moving on. Only a minority are actually moved to action, and an even smaller minority to violence, the latter generally encouraged by foundations, NGOs, or intelligence agency-affiliated religious organizations. In regards to Christianity and Islam, France has largely sided with freedom of speech at this point. Still, Charlie Hebdo has served to act as a catalyst in a number of instances of incitement (though, to be clear, the magazine itself should not be blamed for the reaction of others) of the Muslim communities in France and abroad. Is it possible that the magazine actually serves the purpose of intentionally inciting these types of religious riots and acts of violence from fundamentalists brought into France by the French government and armed by them abroad? Is Charlie Hebdo really a free and independent magazine, or is it actually a tool of the Anglo-Americans in their attempt to maintain the strategy of tension domestically and abroad? 3.) France arms terrorist groups like ISIS and al-Qaeda If the attackers were indeed members of one of the myriad terrorist groups documented to be under the direction and control of Western powers, France itself is to be implicated in the cause and execution of the attacks. As Tony Cartalucci of Land Destroyer Report writes in his own article, France Armed Terrorists That Struck Paris, France, as part of a NATO-led coalition, has been arming, funding, aiding, and otherwise perpetuating Al Qaeda terrorists for years, beginning, on record in Libya with the overthrow of Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi and continuing until today with NATOs arming, harboring, and backing of Al Qaeda terrorists including the so-called Islamic State (ISIS) within and along Syrias borders. With the recent attack in Paris likely the work of the very terrorists France has been arming and backing across North Africa and the Middle East, the French government itself stands responsible, guilty of the continued material support of a terrorist organization that has now killed French citizens, including two police officers, not only on French soil, but within the French capital itself. In his article Timeline: Whered Paris Shooters Get Their Weapons? Cartalucci also provides a timeline of assistance, aid, and arms provided to Islamic terrorists since 2011. He writes, 2011 France supplying weapons to Libyan rebels, London Telegraph: A French military spokesman, Colonel Thierry Burkhard, said it had provided light arms such as assault rifles for civilian communities to protect themselves against Col Gaddafi. But the decision to arm the rebels is a further move towards direct involvement in the land war on top of the air war against Col Muammar Gaddafi. The Nafusa rebels have come closest to breaking through to Tripoli itself of any of the front lines of the conflict, while three months of Nato bombing have failed to dislodge Col Gaddafi from power. Le Figaro, the French newspaper which first reported the air drops, said the shipment included rifles, machine guns and rocket-propelled grenades, along with Milan anti-tank missiles. 2011 Libyan rebel commander admits his fighters have al-Qaeda links, London Telegraph: Abdel-Hakim al-Hasidi, the Libyan rebel leader, has said jihadists who fought against allied troops in Iraq are on the front lines of the battle against Muammar Gaddafis regime. 2012 France to push for arming Syrias opposition coalition, the BBC: Frances foreign minister has said he will discuss supplying arms to the Syrian opposition coalition with European partners. The government plans to push for a relaxation of the EU arms embargo to Syria to enable defensive arms to reach opposition fighters. 2013 Syria crisis: France and Britain move a step closer to arming rebels, the London Guardian: France and Britain have moved a step closer to arming the opposition to the Assad regime in a radical move aimed at tipping the balance in the two-year civil war while also ignoring European policy on Syria. The French president, Franois Hollande, went into an EU summit in Brussels with a dramatic appeal for Europe to join Paris and London in lifting a European arms embargo, but the sudden policy shift was certain to run into stiff German opposition. 2013 Syrian rebels pledge loyalty to al-Qaeda, USA Today: A Syrian rebel groups April pledge of allegiance to al-Qaedas replacement for Osama bin Laden suggests that the terrorist groups influence is not waning and that it may take a greater role in the Western-backed fight to topple Syrian President Bashar Assad. The pledge of allegiance by Syrian Jabhat al Nusra Front chief Abou Mohamad al-Joulani to al-Qaeda leader Sheik Ayman al-Zawahri was coupled with an announcement by the al-Qaeda affiliate in Iraq, the Islamic State of Iraq, that it would work with al Nusra as well. 2014 France delivered arms to Syrian rebels, Hollande confirms, France 24: President Francois Hollande said on Thursday that France had delivered weapons to rebels battling the Syrian regime of Bashar al-Assad a few months ago. 4.) France ordered aircraft carrier to the Gulf in order to fight ISIS nearly a full day before the attacks in France. While certainly not conclusive evidence that the attack on Charlie Hebdo was an inside job, it is without a doubt very questionable. After all, it should be remembered that, when the French people and even some of its parliamentarians were hesitant to engage in military action in Iraq, ISIS released a video of an alleged beheading of a Frenchman, which provided justification for French involvement. This was the third video in a series that prompted justification for action from each of the target countries. Undoubtedly, such brazen attacks inside France will drum up even more support for French military action in the Middle East. The fact that the military action was announced a full day before the attacks took place will be no matter to the few members of the general public who discover it. As Agence France Presse reported on Tuesday January 6, The deployment of the marine battle group is due to be announced by President Francois Hollande when he gives his annual new years speech to the armed forces onboard the Charles de Gaulle on January 14, according to the Mer et Marine news site. The Elysee Palace confirmed to AFP that the carrier would travel to the Gulf on its way to India, where it is due to take part in exercises in mid-April. The Charles de Gaulle will be available to participate, if necessary, in all operational missions, the Elysee spokesman said. According to Mer et Marine, the Charles de Gaulle carrier will travel to the Gulf with its fleet of air and naval craft, including Rafale and Super Etendard fighter jets and an attack submarine, to take part in the US-led bombing campaign against IS forces in Iraq. 5.) Timing takes place after French government begins to show signs of opposing Russian sanctions and recognizing a Palestinian state. Timing is everything. This phrase is particularly relevant in the field of propaganda. Because of this, many are now wondering whether or not the attacks were some false flag type event used as an attempt to reign in members of the French government who may be straying off the reservation. For instance, in December of 2014, the lower house of the French parliament voted to recognize a Palestinian state. While the vote will not likely affect Frances foreign policy, it is a powerful symbol of a changing of the tide in terms of popular opinion regarding the Palestinian/Israeli conflict. Likewise, the recent statement by French President Francois Hollande that the sanctions on Russia must end, could be seen as a threat to Anglo-American solidarity. Thus, such attacks could serve as a justification for French military action in the Middle East, a reminder to some players in the French government not to show dissension in public. There is also the potential domestic agenda to be considered. Given the fact that the attacks are being painted as a fundamentalist response to the mockery of Islam, it is likely that the agenda will revolve around the issue of free speech and the police state. With the meme of I stand with Free Speech making its rounds across the Internet in response to the narrative of the attack, it is more likely that the attack will be used to increase public support for military action overseas and acceptance of an even greater police state at home. The attacks and their subsequent coverage are likely to be used to engender further hatred and distrust of Islam, thereby injecting the circle of extremism and hate (Christian to Muslim to Christian to Muslim and on and on) with fresh fuel. Convincing Christians that all Muslims are extremists and convincing Muslims that all Christians are extremists will be a goal of radicalization made all that much easier with the Charlie Hebdo attacks fresh in the minds of the French people. Of course, with the incessant political correctness running rampant across the entire West, it is also possible that the attacks may be used to silence criticism not necessarily of Islam but of the policy of unfettered immigration which has contributed to even greater economic troubles and the destruction of French culture. 6.) One of the attackers left his ID for the police to find While one of the alleged attackers, 18-year-old Hamyd Mourad, turned himself into police late Wednesday afternoon, it was reported that police were able to identify one of other attackers after he left his identification papers in the getaway car that the two assailants ditched. While dropping ones ID in the process of a getaway is certainly not outside the realm of possibility, such a convenience for law enforcement cannot help but remind informed observers of the survival of the alleged hijackers paper passports on 9/11. Conclusion Whatever the true nature of the Charlie Hebdo attacks may be blowback or false flag there is clearly much more to the story than what the mainstream press is printing and promoting. Regardless, the only thing that we can know with absolute certainty is that the Charlie Hebdo attacks will be used as propaganda to the utmost effect by all Western and NATO governments in the push for further war abroad and an even greater police state at home. Recently from Brandon Turbeville: Brandon Turbeville is an author out of Florence, South Carolina. He has a Bachelors Degree from Francis Marion University and is the author of six books, Codex Alimentarius The End of Health Freedom, 7 Real Conspiracies,Five Sense Solutionsand Dispatches From a Dissident, volume 1 and volume 2, and The Road to Damascus: The Anglo-American Assault on Syria.Turbeville has published over 300 articles dealing on a wide variety of subjects including health, economics, government corruption, and civil liberties. Brandon Turbevilles podcast Truth on The Tracks can be found every Monday night 9 pm EST at UCYTV. He is available for radio and TV interviews. Please contact activistpost (at) gmail.com. BREAKING: Russian Think Tank claims US Intel carried out #CharlieHebdo attack in Paris: http://osnetdaily.com/2015/01/russian-think-tank-us-intel-carried-charliehebdo-attack/ Brother Nathanael has a good article on this. Take it or leave it. http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=995 Please do not poison the discussion with articles from a hate-filled anti-Semitic website like realjewsnews! I see the Zionist Israeli regime as war criminals, as do many Jews, but when you include Jew-haters as authors of a good article on this, you just shame yourself. I will not take a piece of hate speech but I will ask that you keep this kind of bigotry out of the discussion. To him who has an ear, let him hear. Brother Nathanael is a former Talmudic Jew, so he has a lot of credibility. He knows their teachings very well. And he is Semitic. He is anti- Zionist, as you seem to be. So if someone you dont like says the sky is blue, its not really blue because, well, because hes a bad boy? I dont follow your drift. What does sky is blue have to do with using a virulent anti-Jewish website as good place to recommend? Are you perhaps telling us that you do indeed get much of your information from places like realjewnews and stormfront, leading neo-Nazi websites. You dont have to kill the messenger when they have already drunk the kool-aid. Well then, how about plain old no? I know the racist deeply believes his views that blacks are inferior, less intelligent, more criminal, etc is the truth. That is the danger of ignorance, as hatred is founded on fear, and fear is based on ignorance. The Nazi deeply believes that Jews are inferior and deserve to be killed. This is his truth. Truth is what we can support with logic and evidence, without preconceptions. Racial bigotry is not inherent; it is taught. To your NO (the perfect expression of negativity), which you leave without context so empty of any meaning, I oppose with YES. Yes you can change. Yes you can replace your ignorance with knowledge, your fear with trust, and your poisoned truth with genuine truth. Yes! EVen you can cleanse your mind of the lies you have been taught and seek to defend. You can become fully human.if you want. Shut up, hippie. What are negroes? Where did you get your PH.D in genetics? Wrong answer So whats your opinion of Kikes? What is your opinion of Hitler? Better than kikes diese kikes sind infuhrer ! ^ bellend Well, Im not sure if racism is taught, at least not the natural differences weve recognized between each other for thousands of years. There is a difference between racism and violently inspired and taught racism. Maybe we need a new word to describe what Im talking about? Were not all equal, that is a fact. We have different cultures and beliefs and when those cultures are forced to coexist bad things happen as a result of it. You cannot legislate these things out of society. When you flood the nations of Europe with foreigners you can expect many horrible results. It isnt racist to want to preserve ones culture and peoples. What is racist (hated filled) is forcing people to coexist with others who are vastly different, who do not want to coexist with each other and have no need or want to assimilate into the foreign culture they now find themselves in. The belief that we can all get along and exist in a multicultural society (tolerance) where everyone is happy and giddy is a huge lie. It hasnt worked in America or Europe and it will not work anywhere on this planet. I wonder, what would the middle eastern countries do if millions of Europeans decided to migrate into their lands? Do you think they would just except us and let us live in peace? No one is born with the idea that skin color, any more than eye color or hair color, is a reason to rank people as racism does. All (ALL) professional anthropological and genetics organizations reject race as a biological fact (due to their being more variation among ethnic groups than between them) and recognize it, by default, as an ideological construct. Racial theory was invented to justify slavery. Well, we do it naturally, dont we? Personally I look at all human beings as belonging to the same family, in essence, one race of people. But lets not be naive, ethnic and cosmetic differences do make a difference. When I look at a black man, an Indian from India or an Asian I immediately see and feel the differences between us. When I get to know these different people I understand and can see the cultural differences also. This doesnt cause me to hate though, though in other people that does seem to be their first response. I can enjoy their company and their cultural differences, I can recognize what we have in common, beyond simply being human, but I can also recognize that trying to forcefully throw us together in the same environment isnt a good idea. It may work on as smaller scale to a certain degree but when politicians create edicts to legislate our moral and ethical behavior, based on forcing us all together, i.e., tolerance, based on race then I have to cry foul. Explain to me why European nations are being forced to become multicultural and multiracial (regardless if it is false construct)? Why are so many Jewish ideologues behind this forced meshing of cultures and ethnicities? Im no antisemite but I can provide evidence, from their own mouths, that they are leading the way to destroy the monolithic white European nations. Do you see any other countries being forced to take millions and millions of European immigrants? Does Israel practice what it preaches? Do you know what replacement values are? European women are not having enough children to replace those who are dying. This simply means that in less then a hundred years there will be no more Europeans left. Those foreigners who immigrate to Europe are having children by the droves. They are literally out-breeding Europeans which means Europe will be their continent in as little as one hundred years. The same thing is true in America, New Zealand, Canada, and Australia. Do you see a pattern here? Do you think its alright to allow a unique and amazing people to be destroyed by way of a politically correct, state sponsored genocide? There are professors at Harvard who are preaching the destruction of all white males and the mainstream media isnt batting an eye at what they would normally call hate speech. Why is that? The people who control the mainstream media, whether it be the print media, Hollywood, etc. have a plan. It isnt a secret, you can read about it in the books they publish, in the articles they write and in the movies they produce. They are using Fabian Socialism to slowly yet surely destroy an entire race of people. The world does nothing, not even a whisper is heard. Racial theory was invented by a Zionist. So when can you start helping out in Liberia or Sierra Leone ? Parts of Africa can truly benefit from your hands on wisdom .. (boktos) Even Ebono the saint (*gags*) form J3W2 was just a poser, evidently much like yourself. Where was this valiant African Rights selfnews when it mattered ? Too afraid of the African Spirit Obola ? Yet, really coined it when it came to the idiot box. Do they know its Christmas ?. As if he cared. Shame on you Uncool Daft, talks too much, at 70 something, its time to set an example, dont you think? Please document in full (pics and text) your bright conclusion and well revised comprehensible solution to overcoming the parasite that is feeding off the reasonable, natural human psyche. None of the typical mainstream leftist/libtard propaganda youve been parroting, please. Your cheap, synthetic, brainless, repetitive, pointless, ideologies may appear to have some substance to the less observant at the moment, but I assure you, they are empty. No wonder those concepts of yours are violently defensive. The only reason for that is because it is based on a lie, and that blind so-called ideal you so valiantly advocate equals nothing but death. So cut the crap. We require a full documented expedition through either one of the ebola rich countries mentioned in the first sentence OR Congo, Nigeria, Uganda, Zimbabwe or Soweto in SA, take your pick. Take a book and pen (yes, we know this is cheating) and document your findings and then come and share it with us please. After your rude awakening, try and come convince us of the benefits of the fable called div3rshi!tty . Either, put up or shut up hippy, madala. A little less conversation a little more action! Lets add agism to your racism and fascism. Fuck off, asshole. You are a disgrace to the human species. Hey now, I offered you the opportunity to demonstrate your argument, but just like any typical tolerant libturd, you revealed your true colors in no time, just because my point of perception doesnt fit into your narrow, degenerate, illogical parroted paradigm. You always resort to the same old violent insults name calling .. That train is never late! Oh please allow him to bring some high-tech gadgets so the natives can take pictures of him being cannibalized. Ok. How about this. Lets grant Uncool Rale Daftt the privilege of showing the natives the marvels of the western technology. Give him a 3D printer to show them. He may even print some cutlery for them! Teach them how to use it . He can pic the alpha male in the pack, and attempt to show to it how to use a camera. Hopefully then everyone can view fully experience the cultural enrichment of this 70 year oldish, washed out, commie, hippy poser, as a bunch of his brainless initiates attempt to ravage devour him with a forkenknife . I dont follow your drift You dont follow ? No kidding, you cant even find your own arschloch mit beiden Hnden You are a disgrace to your species, your nation, and your family. How sad You are entitled to your opinion, but as far as the substance of it is concerned, those that matter to me most, will render it invalid. Who gives a flying fook what you think anyway, your rotting mind is in dire need of sanitation as it is, madala! You are entitled to your opinion, but as far as the content of it is concerned, those that matter to me most, will render it invalid. Who gives a fly!ng f00k what you think anyway, your rotting mind is in dire need of sanitation as it is, madala! But Dale is opposed to the RIGHT WING ADMINISTRATION in kikestan, so doesnt that make him anti-kike? Its so confusing Does the Zionist Israeli regime have anything to do with Kikes? Kikes is a derogatory term invented by racists. Brother Nathanael is a scam artist at the very least and an asset at worst. The man continually asks people for money because of all of the important work he does (is it really hard work to film one self with a tripod and a camera?). What news is Brother Nathanael providing? none at all, its literally what Dale said it is, propaganda and hate-filled ranting. Lets reserve our anger (not hatred) for those intimately involved in this global conspiracy. Not all Jewish people, or even mist Jewish people are part of their cabal. Top 10 (now 12) inconsistencies tally: 2. It looks like they did fire some real rounds from the looks of one of 3. All people who responded to the scene had French Foreign Legion haircuts. Odd for ambulance drivers and EMTs. 4 (a good one) If the perpetrators got away and have not been 5. I never saw any bloody photos from this, not even fake blood, not 6. Target was a group of Jews, who belong to a greater whole which stages B.S. terror attacks frequently. That stinks. 7. How did the road miraculously have no traffic? The scene is set up 8. How did the attackers know there would be a giant staff meeting with 9. The publication had serious prior financial trouble, and if 10. There is no recoil on the AK as it shoots. I initially assumed Inconsistency 11: All video initially posted was shot from ANSWER: They went up ahead of time, got in position, and shot Inconsistency 12: Getaway driver was in school at the time of the incident Classmates stand up for him The classmates of an 18-year-old suspect in the Paris shooting, that Hamyd Mourad was reported to have handed himself to the police at around11pm last night after he saw his name mentioned on the news and his friends and acquaintances have said that he has an alibi, as they claim It wont matter, just like the Boston bombing, where dorm room I really like the one where the officer gets shot with an AK 47 and yet doesnt bleed or twitch just falls downHmmm has anyone seen the Zapruter footage of the Kennedy assassination?? And why, in the main roof-top video that was initially shown, are two of the people in it (who presumably ran there in a state of panic from the offices below), wearing flak-jackets? Hey here is another one that can see! Good job Keith now if The guy who shot the video is a Syrian with ties to Free Syrian Army the very terrorist organization that France is supporting, his name is Martin Boudot. More on him at this blog: https://earthlinggb.wordpress.com/2015/01/08/paris-shooting-vive-la-bull-merde/#comment-10295 After over a hundred years false flag events by the US government, anytime anything like this happens, I consider them guilty until proven innocent. Just like the US government considers Americans guilty until proven innocent. Youre right. Kikes guilty until proven innocent? Heres three more.. Pay no attention to dancing Israelis here to document the event (911) Pay no attention to dancing Israelis on Kiev roof tops sniping both sides. (how they roll) Pay no attention to dancing Israelis on Paris streets shouting Allahu Akbar! The tactic of Zionists which always works is, to kill some, or more (6 bill in the II WW) and abuse someone other to have done that. So the door to attack him is open. As Zionists possess the media chain all scenario function for the major public. As being done secret it is hard to prove as it remains an assumption. 9/11, Boston, even Gaza, winning the medieval Scots . Tens of thousands of policemen are being #6: just like the intact passport found at the WTC, after they fell. Leaving your ID??? We agree. Sandy Hebdo Phony Baloney Hmmm? So its a good thing, allowing millions of Muslims into the west, after our forefathers fought and died to keep them from overrunning Europe? The Germans are protesting Muslim immigration as we speak and theyre being called Nazis for wanting to preserve their race and culture. France has long been a stronghold for Muslims and London is predominantly foreign at this point. It looks more like India then England. The same thing is going on in America. So why is everyone so blind or so politically correct that they resolve to do nothing about it? Forget about the false flag aspects in order to continue the bogus war on terror, what about the very real threat of Europeans being bred out of existence in their own countries? Were already well below replacement values, i.e., our women are not having enough babies to replace our populations. Russia and Germany are in seriously dire straights, especially Russia. You can thank the same Zionist controlled politicians that are running this current scam on us. By the 22nd century well be a hollow shell of our former selves, hated and despised the world over, weak and ripe for total destruction. Your views on the other are no different from Hitler and all other racists. Race is an ideological construct; you cannot preserve a biological race, as such does not exist. European whites killed each other by the tens of millions with no help from Jews or Muslims. So much for our race. You are promoting a divisive and historically murderous division of the population between us (ie whites) and them. No group has killed more people than the whites. Why not take a scientific view and see that there are no races, only subgroups with more differences within groups than between? Look up race as an ideological construct, not a biological fact, as determined by all anthropological and genetics professional organizations. Race is a concept invented in modern times to rank people by skin color. It was invented to justify slavery and persecution of people based on color of skin. Race is a racist concept. Dont believe me: learn what the geneticists have found. Here a few samples by geneticists: Race remains an inflammatory issue, both socially and scientifically. Fortunately, modern human genetics can deliver the salutary message that human populations share most of their genetic variation and that there is no scientific support for the concept that human populations are discrete, nonoverlapping entities. Furthermore, by offering the means to assess disease-related variation at the individual level, new genetic technologies may eventually render race largely irrelevant in the clinical setting. Thus, genetics can and should be an important tool in helping to both illuminate and defuse the race issue. http://www.nature.com/ng/journal/v36/n11s/full/ng1435.html http://www.aaanet.org/stmts/racepp.htm links to the statement by the American Anthropological Association: From its inception, this modern concept of race.. was a mode of classification linked specifically to peoples in the colonial situation. It subsumed a growing ideology of inequality devised to rationalize European attitudes and treatment of the conquered and enslaved peoples. Proponents of slavery in particular during the 19th century used race to justify the retention of slavery. The ideology magnified the differences among Europeans, Africans, and Indians, established a rigid hierarchy of socially exclusive categories underscored and bolstered unequal rank and status differences, and provided the rationalization that the inequality was natural or God-given. The different physical traits of African-Americans and Indians became markers or symbols of their status differences. As they were constructing US society, leaders among European-Americans fabricated the cultural/behavioral characteristics associated with each race, linking superior traits with Europeans and negative and inferior ones to blacks and Indians. Numerous arbitrary and fictitious beliefs about the different peoples were institutionalized and deeply embedded in American thought. Early in the 19th century the growing fields of science began to reflect the public consciousness about human differences. Differences among the racial categories were projected to their greatest extreme when the argument was posed that Africans, Indians, and Europeans were separate species, with Africans the least human and closer taxonomically to apes. Ultimately race as an ideology about human differences was subsequently spread to other areas of the world. It became a strategy for dividing, ranking, and controlling colonized people used by colonial powers everywhere. But it was not limited to the colonial situation. In the latter part of the 19th century it was employed by Europeans to rank one another and to justify social, economic, and political inequalities among their peoples. During World War II, the Nazis under Adolf Hitler enjoined the expanded ideology of race and racial differences and took them to a logical end: the extermination of 11 million people of inferior races (e.g., Jews, Gypsies, Africans, homosexuals, and so forth) and other unspeakable brutalities of the Holocaust. Race thus evolved as a worldview, a body of prejudgments that distorts our ideas about human differences and group behavior. Racial beliefs constitute myths about the diversity in the human species and about the abilities and behavior of people homogenized into racial categories. The myths fused behavior and physical features together in the public mind, impeding our comprehension of both biological variations and cultural behavior, implying that both are genetically determined. Racial myths bear no relationship to the reality of human capabilities or behavior. Scientists today find that reliance on such folk beliefs about human differences in research has led to countless errors.How people have been accepted and treated within the context of a given society or culture has a direct impact on how they perform in that society. The racial worldview was invented to assign some groups to perpetual low status, while others were permitted access to privilege, power, and wealth. The tragedy in the United States has been that the policies and practices stemming from this worldview succeeded all too well in constructing unequal populations among Europeans, Native Americans, and peoples of African descent. Given what we know about the capacity of normal humans to achieve and function within any culture, we conclude that present-day inequalities between so-called racial groups are not consequences of their biological inheritance but products of historical and contemporary social, economic, educational, and political circumstances. Also: check There is great genetic diversity within all human populations. Pure races, in the sense of genetically homogenous populations, do not exist in the human species today, nor is there any evidence that they have ever existed in the past. Wikipedia (with primary sources) reports: Here is an informative study at Adjust your thinking. Beyond that, I cannot help you if you choose to dismiss the findings of the entire universe of those who have spent their lives studying human variation. Why should skin color, which has thousands of tones, be more important than eye color? These fabrications were designed to justify persecution. Its time to reject the racist concept of race. Too bad you dont know how to edit your posts. Im not going to read a post longer then the average news article. You wrote a novella, not a reply. I will of course respond to your ignorant first sentence. I have no wish nor plan to kill anyone based on there race or ethnicity. I do not idolize Herr Hitler. Why didnt you bring up Lenin or Joseph Stalin? And no, I am very different then Hitler. Im just more honest then you, or more experienced. I judge individuals on how they treat me and other people. There are good people and bad people in this world, but thats a judgment on the individual level. Racially, tribally, culturally, ethnicity, whatever youd like to call it, generalizations can be valuable and accurate. (I will not use the term species as Darwins vile theory was used by both the Nazis and the Bolshevik communists to justify the murder of millions of peoples). It is a fact that people are different, both culturally and cosmetically, divided by language and custom, ad infinitum. Your beliefs are unrealistic and naive. History has taught us how wrong you truly are, time and time again, and no matter the amount of insults and slurs you throw my way, that will not change. Hmmm means, motive, opportunity and who benefits.Clearly Israel has already directly benefited in many ways. Most importantly France has done an about face and now refuses to support Palestine. Muslim terrorists are once again being blamed, supporting Israeli wailing about the threat of Islam. And an Israeli news team just happened to literally right there as the attack unfolded. Why is it that all these terrorist attacks just happen to be perfectly timed to support.Israel. No mention is being made in the MSM that the police officer murdered in the Video just happened to be a Muslim. Not much about the fact that the cartoonist killed also had a long history of mocking Israel. Let us not forget the incredibly brutal, but perfectly timed terrorists attack (also blamed on Muslim terrorists)the last time a country made a big push to support Palestine. Sweden suffered the same results as France when it publicly demanded support and justice for Israel. Now lets apply just a bit of common sense and critical thinking here people. This was a profession hit. It was extremely well planned and carried out. SO it stands to reason that the people behind it would understand all the consequences and ramifications involved. So why in the world would Muslim terrorists stage such an attack against a country that just announced to the world its support for Palestine? The simple answer is NO MUSLIM TERRORIST ORGANIZATION WITH THIS LEVEL OF SOPHISTICATION WOULD EVER DO SOMETHING THIS DETRIMENTAL TO THE CAUSE. It is a false flag from start to finish. Yet another attack perfectly timed to aid Israel and undermine Palestinian statehood. Good grief people wake up. Youre a crazy conspiracy theorist all that matters is that MUSLIMS ARE EVIL AND WANT TO KILL EVERYBODY! forget evidence, logic, reason, common sense MOTIVE and above all who benefits Readers beware: the racists are out and frothing at the mouth. Sadly, you will find in the following posts many openly racist and fascist comments, with ugly hate speech. One has posted that Hitler was better than kikes. selfnewspost unfortunately draws in the lowest of the low to vent their poisoned minds and spread their hatred. If you are offended by ugly racist commentary, please be advised. Readers, come view the spectacle of a panicking, self-absorbed liberal shitlord attempting to defend his masochistic ideologies. In desperation, he issues futile appeals hoping to find someone who might somewhat agree with him. A necessity in maintaining a false sense of meaning to his pathetic existence detached from reality. Spot on Doug! Very Poetic. I brought some popcorn . 