Vaccine Damage, The Hidden TruthBy Jon Rappoport The issue here is: refusing to believe an uncomfortable fact. An unpleasant fact. A devastating fact. There is a simple formula that describes how the public refuses to believe an uncomfortable fact. It goes this way: Well, if that were true, then Its a statement that suggests a person is standing at the edge of a cliff. And if he accepted some particularly unpleasant fact, hed suddenly fall off. Another way to look at it: if he accepted this fact, it would lead, by contagion, to him admitting there were other very uncomfortable truths. And then, by extension, like branches quickly growing out of a tree, a whole host of multiplying shocks would become known. So it is, in the area of vaccines. The experts, like preening peacocks, assure us that the shots are amazingly safe. After all, theyve done the studies. Theyve published the studies. There is widespread fraud in those reports, because, for example, of the short follow-up periodas if adverse effects could only occur in a 72-hour window, or over the course of a few weeks. Who decided that? Who made that arbitrary rule? And then, most importantly, studies are not real life. We have seen glowing assessments of medical drugs in print, but when they are (like Vioxx) released for public use, people start dropping like flies. In the case of vaccines (in real life), the one system for reporting human damage is broken. Completely broken. Its called VAERS, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. Its run by the CDC and the FDA. (My readers are aware of how many crimes and lies Ive laid at the door of those two august agencies.) Who can make a report of an adverse vaccine-reaction? A parent, a doctor, a nurse, a nurse practitioner. You can see the problems right away. How many parents even know the VAERS system exists? How many parents have the knowledge or the will to follow through and submit a report? How many parents will dare to suspect that a vaccine has injured their children? How many doctors or nurses who administer vaccinations are eager to report cases of children who incur obvious brain damage from the shot THEY GAVE? Sofor doctors and medical experts to claim vaccines are safe in the real world? Theyre pretending they know what they dont know. Theyre faking it. But if that were true, then Thats right. If that were true, we would have no proof that vaccines are safe. Therefore, when the government advises and nudges and even demands that people line up for vaccinations, the government is in the dark about safety. Completely in the dark. But if that were true Then the entire population is at risk. Thats right. Lets go back to those pre-marketing studies, which are done on vaccines in order to gain FDA approval. Who conducts the studies? The vaccine manufacturers. And who stands to profit from the sale of the vaccines? Ever heard of conflict of interest? And have any studies been done to assess the risks of giving multiple vaccines? After all, the CDC schedule keeps getting longer and longer. I can find no evidence of well-formed clinical trials assessing the safety of shooting people in the arm with multiple vaccines. Does that seem like an oversight? A horrendous hole in the science of vaccination? But if thats true, then We would, again, have no proof that vaccination is safe. Correct. Now, from the historical record, we do have many, many disturbing examples of what has happened to people after vaccines have been approved. Here are just a few: What about this? Accidents may, however, follow the use of this so-called killed (rabies) vaccine owing to inadequate processing. A very serious occurrence of this sort occurred at Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil, in 1960. No fewer than 18 out of 66 persons vaccinated with Fermis carbolized (rabies) vaccine suffered from encephalomyelitis and every one of the eighteen died. Sir Graham Wilson, Hazards of Immunization. What about this? Administration of KMV (killed measles vaccine) apparently set in motion an aberrant immunologic response that not only failed to protect children against natural measles, but resulted in heightened susceptibility. JAMA Aug. 22, 1980, vol. 244, p. 804, Vincent Fulginiti and Ray Helfer. The authors indicate that such falsely protected children can come down with an often severe, atypical form of measles. Atypical measles is characterized by fever, headache and a diverse rash (which) may consist of a mixture of macules, papules, vesicles, and pustules What about this? Based on the only U.S. findings on adverse DPT reactions, an FDA-financed study at the University of California, Los Angeles, one out of every 350 children will have a convulsion; one in 180 children will experience high-pitched screaming; and one in 66 will have a fever of 105 degrees or more. Jennifer Hyman, Democrat and Chronicle, Rochester, New York, special supplement on DPT, dated April, 1987. What about this? A study undertaken in 1979 at the University of California, Los Angeles, under the sponsorship of the Food and Drug Administration, and which has been confirmed by other studies, indicates that in the U.S.A. approximately 1,000 infants die annually as a direct result of DPT vaccinations, and these are classified as SIDS (Sudden Infant Death Syndrome) deaths. These represent about 10 to 15% of the total number of SIDS deaths occurring annually in the U.S.A. (between 8,000 and 10,000 depending on which statistics are used). Leon Chaitow, Vaccination and Immunization, CW Daniel Company Limited, Saffron Walden, Essex, England, 1987. What about this? Up to half of family doctors do not want to be vaccinated against swine flu. GPs will be first in the line for the jabs when they become available but many will decline, even though they will be offering the vaccine to their patients. More than two thirds of those who will turn the jab down believe it has not been tested enough. Most also believe the flu has turned out to be so mild in the vast majority of cases that the vaccine is not needed. Last night Government experts criticised GPs who decide not to have the jab, saying they will put vulnerable patients needlessly at risk. A week ago, a poll of nurses showed that a third would turn down the opportunity of being vaccinated against swine flu. News that medics are unconvinced by the need for a vaccine will cause grave concern to patients who will be invited for the jab over the next few months. A poll of doctors for Pulse magazine found that 49 per cent would reject the vaccine with 9 per cent undecided. Daily Mail, 8/25/2009. These few references to vaccine disasters are but a drop in the bucket, of course. If these and other such references are true (and they are), then Doctors and medical bureaucrats are telling massive lies about the safety of vaccines. They arent just ignorant about safety. Correct. And if thats true, then How can we trust these people? How can we trust the major media outlets that give overwhelming support to these people? We cant. When mothers tell the world that their children, after a shot, are never the same again, they arent providing anecdotes, contrasted with scientific studies. The mothers are giving us a much more reliable account of what vaccines are doing than the fakery of the science. But if the mothers are right (and they are) And if the experts are lying through their teeth about vaccine safety (and they are) Then Reality is not what were told it is. Its the opposite of what were told. And this isnt merely an intellectual glitch. Every day, lives are on the line. Every single day. Ill leave you with a fantastical piece of science from the government VAERS website VAERS Data page. It centers on the use of the word coincidence. If this doesnt convince you that truth has been hijacked, I dont know what will: More than 10 million vaccines per year are given to children less than 1 year old, usually between 2 and 6 months of age. At this age, infants are at greatest risk for certain medical adverse events, including high fevers, seizures, and sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). Some infants will experience these medical events shortly after a vaccination by coincidence. These coincidences make it difficult to know whether a particular adverse event resulted from a medical condition or from a vaccination. Do you see the diabolical criminal sophistry? Some infants will experience these medical events [seizures, death, etc.] shortly after a vaccination by coincidence. By coincidence. Yes, you see, an hour after the baby was given the vaccine, he also contracted a raging case of meningitis, or his parents also, coincidentally, fed him a poison, or a bio-warfare germ floated in the window and settled on his tongue, or a flash of light from a distant galaxy struck him in the eyes and blinded him. Therefore, reputable scientists are unable to determine whether the vaccine caused the damage. This is what government scientists and bureaucrats are selling terrified grief-stricken parents whose childs life has just been destroyed by a shot in the arm. This is policy. This is what you shouldnt question, because if you do, you might experience an unpleasant sensation in the pit of your stomach. Yes, Your Honor, the child was standing in the middle of the street, and a car did come over the hill and strike him, but it would be a grievous mistake to assume the car caused the damage the child incurred. Something else could have happened at the same instant, something of which were unaware. Im prepared to give the court a list of 50 possible other events They, the scientists and the doctors and medical bureaucrats, are, indeed, prepared. Theyre fully prepared, without a shred of conscience, to explain how their attack on your childs life had absolutely nothing to do with them. (To read about Jons mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.) The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here. Point very well made! Thanks John It used to be that when a drug company developed a drug and did trials, those trials then had to be replicated by the FDA. This is good science. During the Bush Administration, the rules were changed so that the FDA no longer attempted to replicate drug trials: they were simply required to take the drug companys word for how their trials had turned out. This is because Big Government is bad, and the marketplace is good. Those parts of Big Government that help and protect people, like clinics, Social Security, and oversight of pharmaceutical companies claims for their products, have to be cut because we cant afford them. At the same time, those parts of Big Government that protect the status quo, like Homeland Security, and the giganto-enormous military industrial complex, have to be hugely expanded. After starting what turned out to be a 50+ back and forth discussion (I was neither pro nor negative I just chose not to vaccinate my children) on the Robert ANton Wilson fan group on FBwhoahhe was a rather free and lucid philosopherhis fandom is not! I just posted this therehopefully the several people who wanted to punch me in the face never show upI live in rural BC and it would not go over well for them! But it came to that at points! Argue this15 minute videowas responded to in 3-4 seconds by people who knew the point of view was wrong! CheersI just posted thisI got some sleep in between the flurry of commentslol Another great article Jon. The truth is like a ratchet once people realise the truth there is no going back. It may take a year, 5 years, 50 years but this is only going to end one way. Moms stop the invitro and stop vaxxing (vexing) your child. Whats the health problem with invitro? I think you meant the unholy new practice of vaccinating while pregnant which will have a similar outcome as thalidomide except mostly mental effects. or terminations instead of flipper babies. H1N1 vaccine caused a 700% increase in miscarriages at every trimester. The term in vitro means in a test tube . In VIVO means in your body. I really dont know about this hacking thing..But i just came accrossa good hacker who helped me hack my boyfriends text messages and watts messages remotely..You dnt have to touch his phone while you have access to his conversations..Contact xoogre@gmail.com tell him #Janice referred you then thank me later thank you Jon.. another fine article to spread about. I do wish to add: when I was a practicing neuropsychologist (am now retiredthank god) I worked with more than a few parents whose children developed autism immediately consequent to receiving vaccinations. Since I had become aware of the flu shot hoaxes and the creation of illnesses (see Baxter pharma) and the real damage done during the decade following 9/11 it did not require any super intelligence to recognize that a great evil was at war against the people. by the medical/pharmaceutical industries. And who is it that owns and controls these forces? If I accept seeming evil for any other purpose, I am at once bound in chains of sense and seeming and sink deeper and deeper in the shadows, until that which should be a symbol for the very highest, following the law of contradictories, becomes the very lowest and foulest. Looking out into the world to-day, with its teeming Jon Rappaport has made a career of misquoting studies of vaccines. He quotes the naturopath Chaitlow who is not an MD and has not experience in peer-reviewed research: A study undertaken in 1979 at the University of California, Los Angeles, under the sponsorship of the Food and Drug Administration, and which has been confirmed by other studies, indicates that in the U.S.A. approximately 1,000 infants die annually as a direct result of DPT vaccinations, and these are classified as SIDS (Sudden Infant Death Syndrome) deaths. These represent about 10 to 15% of the total number of SIDS deaths occurring annually in the U.S.A. (between 8,000 and 10,000 depending on which statistics are used). Leon Chaitow, Vaccination and Immunization, CW Daniel Company Limited, Saffron Walden, Essex, England, 1987. This is a naked lie. The study does NOT claim these deaths are a direct result of DPT vaccinations. 1979 Meetings are held at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Bureau of Biologics and at the CDC to discuss reports of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) in Tennessee following pertussis vaccination. NO evidence of a causal relationship is found. Wyeth Laboratories, the manufacturer, withdraws the questioned vaccine lot nonetheless (Coulter and Fisher, 1985). FDA funds a study to evaluate adverse reactions to DPT vaccines. The study is to be carried out at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA). The Vaccine Damage Payment Act is passed in Great Britain. The act provides a mechanism for government compensation to those with vaccine-associated injuries (Griffith, 1989). Sweden stops using whole-cell pertussis vaccine because of reported reactions and a lack of vaccine efficacy. The number of pertussis cases increases (Coulter and Fisher, 1985). 1981 The findings of the FDA-sponsored UCLA study are published (Cody et al., 1981). The rate of minor reactions and serious short-term reactions following DPT is found to be higher than that following DT. The British Blue Book (Department of Health and Social Security, 1981) is published. It includes the findings of the NCES (Alderslade et al., 1981) and reports from several panels. The NCES concludes that both DPT and measles vaccines can cause acute neurologic reactions and permanent brain damage but that the latter is a very rare complication. The attributable risk (see Glossary of Terms) of serious neurologic illness in the 7 days following pertussis vaccination is estimated to be 1 in 110,000 immunizations, and that of persistent neurologic damage after 1 year is estimated to be 1 in 310,000 immunizations (with wide confidence limits in both cases).http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK234365/ My point is not to take a position on vaccines but to point out that Rappaport is not a reliable source of information. He quotes a book, which was not peer-reviewed, in a a total misstatement of the findings of the UCLA study. When authors lie, we must dismiss them and seek reliable information. Please read the quotations carefully..I am not taking a position but pointing out dishonest reporting. I think we can all agree that is reprehensible.. We have to fight them. There will not be a peaceful solution to regain our freedom and rights. Anyone who thinks the NWO movement is just going to submit is very mistaken. Its simple. We die fighting or, we die anyway The lethal 4 headed monster: Vaccines, GMOs, chemtrails and fluoride. (We can add: smart phones, cell towers, smart metersam i leaving anything out???) 