Supreme Court Justice Goes Nuclear, Reveals The Real Reason Judge Roberts Saved Obamacare [SEE PHOTOS] The Supreme Court has made several questionable decisions in the last few weeks, including the controversial choice to uphold Obamacare by ruling that the federal government was allowed to provide health care subsidies for residents in 34 states that refused to set up health care exchanges. After the ruling, Justice Antonin Scalia was not quiet about criticizing Chief Justice John Roberts for his role in the decision. Justice Scalia believes that the health care exchanges but must established by the state in order to be granted tax credits. Words no longer have meaning if an exchange that is not established by a stated is established by the state, Scalia claimed. It is hard to come up with a clearer way to limit tax credits to state exchanges than to use the words established by the State. Scalia went on to accuse Roberts and the other justices who voted in his favor of intentionally ignoring errors in the law. Normal rules of interpretation seem always to yield to the overriding principle of the present Court: The Affordable Care Act must be saved, Scalia commented. We should start calling this law SCOTUScare. Scalia concluded that the discouraging truth is that the Supreme Court of the United States favors some laws over others, and is prepared to do whatever it takes to uphold and assist its favorites. What do you think of Scalias comments? Do you agree? 