Syria: Another Western War Crime In The MakingPaul Craig Roberts The UK Independent reports that over this past week-end Obama, Cameron, and Hollande agreed to launch cruise missile attacks against the Syrian government within two weeks despite the lack of any authorization from the UN and despite the absence of any evidence in behalf of Washingtons claim that the Syrian government has used chemical weapons against the Washington-backed rebels, largely US supported external forces, seeking to overthrow the Syrian government. Indeed, one reason for the rush to war is to prevent the UN inspection that Washington knows would disprove its claim and possibly implicate Washington in the false flag attack by the rebels, who assembled a large number of children into one area to be chemically murdered with the blame pinned by Washington on the Syrian government. Another reason for the rush to war is that Cameron, the UK prime minister, wants to get the war going before the British parliament can block him for providing cover for Obamas war crimes the way that Tony Blair provided cover for George W. Bush, for which Blair was duly rewarded. What does Cameron care about Syrian lives when he can leave office into the waiting arms of a $50 million fortune. The Syrian government, knowing that it is not responsible for the chemical weapons incident, has agreed for the UN to send in chemical inspectors to determine the substance used and the method of delivery. However, Washington has declared that it is too late for UN inspectors and that Washington accepts the self-serving claim of the al Qaeda affiliated rebels that the Syrian government attacked civilians with chemical weapons. (Source)See alsohere. The corrupt British government has declared that Syria can be attacked without UN authorization, just as Serbia and Libya were militarily attacked without UN authorization. In other words, the Western democracies have already established precedents for violating international law. International law? We dont need no stinking international law! The West knows only one rule: Might is Right. As long as the West has the Might, the West has the Right. In a response to the news report that the US, UK, and France are preparing to attack Syria, the Russian Foreign Minister, Lavrov, said that such unilateral action is a severe violation of international law, and that the violation was not only a legal one but also an ethical and moral violation. Lavrov referred to the lies and deception used by the West to justify its grave violations of international law in military attacks on Serbia, Iraq, and Libya and how the US government used preemptive moves to undermine every hope for peaceful settlements in Iraq, Libya, and Syria. Once again Washington has preempted any hope of peaceful settlement. By announcing the forthcoming attack, the US destroyed any incentive for the rebels to participate in the peace talks with the Syrian government. On the verge of these talks taking place, the rebels now have no incentive to participate as the Wests military is coming to their aid. In his press conference Lavrov spoke of how the ruling parties in the US, UK, and France stir up emotions among poorly informed people that, once aroused, have to be satisfied by war. This, of course, is the way the US manipulated the public in order to attack Afghanistan and Iraq. But the American public is tired of the wars, the goal of which is never made clear, and has grown suspicious of the governments justifications for more wars. A Reuters/Ipsos poll finds that Americans strongly oppose U.S. intervention in Syrias civil war and believe Washington should stay out of the conflict even if reports that Syrias government used deadly chemicals to attack civilians are confirmed. (Source)However, Obama could not care less that only 9 percent of the public supports his warmongering. As former president Jimmy Carter recently stated, America has no functioning democracy.It has a police state in which the executive branch has placed itself above all law and the Constitution. This police state is now going to commit yet another Nazi-style war crime of unprovoked aggression. At Nuremberg the Nazis were sentenced to death for precisely the identical actions being committed by Obama, Cameron, and Hollande. The West is banking on might, not right, to keep it out of the criminal dock. The US, UK, and French governments have not explained why it matters whether people in the wars initiated by the West are killed by explosives made of depleted uranium or with chemical agents or any other weapon. It was obvious from the beginning that Obama was setting up the Syrian government for attack. Obama demonized chemical weaponsbut not nuclear bunker busters that the US might use on Iran. Then Obama drew a red line, saying that the use of chemical weapons by the Syrians was such a great crime that the West would be obliged to attack Syria. Washingtons UK puppets, William Hague and Cameron, have just repeated this nonsensical claim.The final step in the frame-up was to orchestrate a chemical incident and blame the Syrian government. What is the Wests real agenda? This is the unasked and unanswered question. Clearly, the US, UK, and French governments, which have displayed continuously their support for dictatorial regimes that serve their purposes, are not the least disturbed by dictatorships. They brand Assad a dictator as a means of demonizing him for the ill-informed Western masses. But Washington, UK, and France support any number of dictatorial regimes, such as the ones in Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, and now the military dictatorship in Egypt that is ruthlessly killing Egyptians without any Western government speaking of invading Egypt for killing its own people. Clearly also, the forthcoming Western attack on Syria has nothing whatsoever to do with bringing freedom and democracy to Syria any more than freedom and democracy were reasons for the attacks on Iraq and Libya, neither of which gained any freedom and democracy. The Western attack on Syria is unrelated to human rights, justice or any of the high sounding causes with which the West cloaks its criminality. The Western media, and least of all the American presstitutes, never ask Obama, Cameron, or Hollande what the real agenda is. It is difficult to believe than any reporter is sufficiently stupid or gullible to believe that the agenda is bringing freedom and democracy to Syria or punishing Assad for allegedly using chemical weapons against murderous thugs trying to overthrow the Syrian government. Of course, the question wouldnt be answered if asked. But the act of asking it would help make the public aware that more is afoot than meets the eye. Originally, the excuse for Washingtons wars was to keep Americans safe from terrorists. Now Washington is endeavoring to turn Syria over to jihad terrorists by helping them to overthrow the secular, non-terrorist Assad government. What is the agenda behind Washingtons support of terrorism? Perhaps the purpose of the wars is to radicalize Muslims and, thereby, destabilize Russia and even China. Russia has large populations of Muslims and is bordered by Muslim countries. Even China has some Muslim population. As radicalization spreads strife into the only two countries capable of being an obstacle to Washingtons world hegemony, Western media propaganda and the large number of US financed NGOs, posing as human rights organizations, can be counted on by Washington to demonize the Russian and Chinese governments for harsh measures against rebels. Another advantage of the radicalization of Muslims is that it leaves former Muslim countries in long-term turmoil or civil wars, as is currently the case in Iraq and Libya, thus removing any organized state power from obstructing Israeli purposes. Secretary of State John Kerry is working the phones using bribes and threats to build acceptance, if not support, for Washingtons war crime-in-the-making against Syria. Washington is driving the world closer to nuclear war than it ever was even in the most dangerous periods of the Cold War. When Washington finishes with Syria, the next target is Iran. Russia and China will no longer be able to fool themselves that there is any system of international law or restraint on Western criminality. Western aggression is already forcing both countries to develop their strategic nuclear forces and to curtail the Western-financed NGOs that pose as human rights organizations, but in reality comprise a fifth column that Washington can use to destroy the legitimacy of the Russian and Chinese governments. Russia and China have been extremely careless in their dealings with the United States. Essentially, the Russian political opposition is financed by Washington. Even the Chinese government is being undermined. When a US corporation opens a company in China, it creates a Chinese board on which are put relatives of the local political authorities. These boards create a conduit for payments that influence the decisions and loyalties of local and regional party members. The US has penetrated Chinese universities and intellectual attitudes. The Rockefeller University is active in China as is Rockefeller philanthropy. Dissenting voices are being created that are arrayed against the Chinese government. Demands for liberalization can resurrect regional and ethnic differences and undermine the cohesiveness of the national government. Once Russia and China realize that they are riven with American fifth columns, isolated diplomatically, and outgunned militarily, nuclear weapons become the only guarantor of their sovereignty. This suggests that nuclear war is likely to terminate humanity well before humanity succumbs to global warming or rising national debts. This article first appeared at Paul Craig Roberts new website Institute For Political Economy. Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy and associate editor of the Wall Street Journal. He was columnist for Business Week, Scripps Howard News Service, and Creators Syndicate. He has had many university appointments. His Internet columns have attracted a worldwide following. 