Judicial Watchdog Official Claims He Was Fired For Complaint Against Judge In Child Custody CaseBy Derrick Broze Paul J. Fischerjoined Michigans Judicial Tenure Commission in January 2001. Fischer joined the states independent judicial disciplinary agency that is supposed to watch over about 600 judges. The commission can investigate claims of misconduct and make recommendations to the Michigan Supreme Court. By the time Fischer was fired in September he was theJTCs executive director and general counsel. He is now suingthe state and the commission with allegations that he was targeted for holding a judge accountable. The judge in question isJudge Lisa Gorcyca of the Oakland County Circuit Court. In June of 2015, Judge Gorcycas actions became a national story after she found three children between the ages of 9 and 13 years old in contempt of court and sentenced them to a juvenile detention center for 17 days. Judge Gorcyca said the children were being punished forrefusing to have a healthy relationship with [their] father. The actions of Judge Gorcyca received worldwide attention, including a video of the June 24, 2015 hearing going viral, exposing Judge Gorcycas egregious behavior on a national scale and leading many media commentators to characterize her conduct as highly abusive toward the minor children, the complaint states. According to Fischer, he was punished for doing what he was legally required to do as part of the commission.He claims that onJuly 10, 2015 he sent an email to JTC members asking for an informal investigation intoJudge Gorcycas conduct. Although the investigation was eventually approved, Fischer says he faced push back from other commissioners who supported the judge. Courthouse News reports: After the formal complaint was filed, about 50 people identifying themselves as lawyers signed a document and press release supporting Judge Gorcyca. Their support of the judge became a topic of discussion at the JTCs Jan. 11, 2016, meeting, according to Fischers lawsuit. The commissioners articulated and seemed to adopt the construct argued by the supporting lawyers: that Judge Gorcyca was a good judge who had a bad day, the complaint states. Fischer claims the JTC began holding executive meetings without him and avoided discussing the issue with him. Soon after theMichigan Supreme Court appointed retired Wayne County Circuit Court Judge Daniel Ryan to oversee the investigation. On July 1, 2016, Ryan issued a 34-page report confirming that Judge Gorcyca was guilty ofjudicial misconduct. Fischer called on the JTC to affirm the findings and recommend a nine-month unpaid suspension and $12,000 fine. Instead, Fischer says he was fired on September 12 as retaliation. Fischer was replaced by Glenn Page, a JTC staff attorney. In November, Under Pages interim watch,the JTCfound thatGorcycalied in responses to questions about the case and recommended she be publicly censured and suspended 30 days. The JTC saidthat Gorcycas answers may have been inaccurate and somewhat misleading, but she did not make intentionally false statements, reports the Detroit Free Press. The commission also saidthe judge crossed the line from proper demeanor to caustic abuse. The Michigan Supreme Court can now choose to accept or reject the recommendations. Commission Chairman Judge David Sawyer said the case Gorcyca was dealing with was difficult and involved complicated issues of parental rights. Judge Sawyer did not elaborate as to whether the difficulties of the case justify locking up children who do not want to live with one parent. Unfortunately, this is just another example of how the States involvement in our lives, especially in relation to children, is typically going to end badly. Derrick Broze is an investigative journalist and liberty activist. He is the Lead Investigative Reporter for selfnewsPost.com and the founder of the TheConsciousResistance.com. Follow him on Twitter. Derrick is the author of three books: The Conscious Resistance: Reflections on Anarchy and Spirituality and Finding Freedom in an Age of Confusion, Vol. 1 and Finding Freedom in an Age of Confusion, Vol. 2 Derrick is available for interviews. Please contact Derrick@activistpost.com This article may be freely reposted in part or in full with author attribution and source link. Image Credit: Pixabay.com Most cops, lawyers and judges are all Freemasons; held by a self destructive blood oath to protect each other from harm. The legal system is skewered. If so, then how and why would they protect this female judge and refuse to protect the male attorney running the judicial review board? Do you know if she was a member of Eastern Star? The Masons are a vastly diminishing group, and yes, they have hand signals that if given alert Brother Masons to their plight and ask for help. Yes, there is almost no Rule of Law today, and with the extraordinary dumbing down of America, the total lack of respect for the Law or for any knowledge, and the widespread abuse and misuse of official power, and the intentional indifference and unconsciousness of Americans, it is nearly impossible to find any justice anywhere in the United States. Oh, for all we know, the female judge is being excused from having to behave with required judicial temperament for reasons stemming from the vast Politically Correct movement. It could be her race that excuses her. Not likely her gender unless she is a militant lesbian. I hope Fischer wins a million dollars. Punish the lawless. Legal system only applies to the plebes and are handed the worst sentences possible. If the kids werent doing what their father told them to do (i.e. going where he told them to go) then the kids were incorrigible and if they remained defiant even to the judge then it was entirely appropriate to send them off to juvenile hall for the weekend. 17 days is pretty severe though for kids so young no matter how bad they were acting This whole idea though that kids can do whatever they want and decide what parent theyre going to live with is asinine. Kids are kids they dont get to make those sorts of choices. They were not in a juvenile crime hearing; she therefore lacked jurisdiction to do that. Furthermore it is apparent she was ignoring evidence to feed a non-evidence based decision. Such findinga are contrary to law. The ability of a judge to hold someone in contempt is not limited to juvenile criminal court What evidence was she ignoring? Maybe she just had doubts about the validity or importance of that evidence. 