After-Birth Abortion: Eugenicists Say Babies are a Parasitic Burden on SocietySusanne Posel, Contributor In a paperpublished in the Journal of Medical Ethics: Giubilini and Minerva believe that infants are a threat to parents because of their financial burden to their parents and that this justifies the murder of new-born babies. In the Senate, Joe Pitts and Chris Smith spoke outagainst this ideology. Smith explains: Giubilini and Minerva say the devaluation of new-born babies is inextricably linked to the devaluation of unborn children. By defining personhood as being established some time after birth, Giubilini and Minerva assert that a fetus has no claim to personhood, and therefore no right to life. They write that: Giubilini and Minerva support previous arguments for infanticide regardless of whether or not the baby were given a short lifespan due to a medical prognosis. Simply by being born the baby is regarded as an unbearable burden on someone, then people should be given the chance of not being forced to do something they cannot afford. Supposedly Parents, relatives and even society should be enabled to force a mother to submit her child to infanticide because of the benefits that one less person would bring to our world. Giubilini and Minerva state that infants are dependent on parents just as fetuses are parasites to the mothers body. And since no one can ensure that this person will not die prematurely in the future, the investment of resources, time and emotional support cannot be assumed to be a right of the infant. During pregnancy, the development of the fetus can reveal defects that can legally warrant a partial-birth abortion. Giubilini and Minerva argue that this fact can be extended to after birth because a defective baby can be an economical, social or psychological burden because of the energy needed to care for the child. They say that people should be given the chance of not being forced to do something they cannot afford. Marjorie Wallace, chief executive of SANE, a mental health charity, stated: We already knew that premature birth may be linked to schizophrenia, but to see evidence linking it to a range of psychiatric conditions which required hospitalization is striking. While Giubilini and Minerva use eugenics agendas to coerce the public into believing that society would be better off without certain burdensome infants, an outright attack on fertilityis taking place. Dr. Martin Matzuk , professor of molecular biology, molecular and human genetics, and pharmacology at Baylor College of Medicine (BCM), is working on a birth-control pill for men that blocks the proteins essential for sperm production rendering men voluntarily infertile. The BCM has a long historyof working to expanding the eugenics agenda with the use of genetic technologies; includingcollaborationwith the German Nazis and their march toward using genetics to create a better human race. By looking for justice as fairness with the ethical practice of genetics and eugenics concerning applied science and social constructs. The advantage of eugenics ideology in genetic technology is viewed as the greatest benefit of individuals with the least advantages. And so by subverting the fact of eugenics in genetic advances will alleviate prejudice and make sure that the eugenics agenda is devoid of negative perceptions so that the genetically disadvantaged could be touted as the beneficiaries of eugenic applications in genetic technologies. Last month, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) hosted The London Family Planning Summit (LFPS) where the BMGF secured funding for depopulation effortsin Africa, India and the Southeast Asian region. Melinda Gates believes that if she can prevent 40% of people who would otherwise have been born, she could justify her family planning scheme to make women healthier whos families are more successful and their communities are more prosperous. Simply put: the BMGF has classified unwanted pregnancies as justification for killing people and they are focusing on eventually eliminating this number to reduce the worlds population. Africa, a big focus for the BMGF is being targeted along with Muslim nations. In this propaganda cartoon, the depiction of brown and black women as disfigured potatoes having much more fun because they have fewer children is not only offensive, but telling of how these global Elite view the people they purport to be saving. By preventing births, the film says that 600,000 people would not be born. Contraception as a first step in the global Elites plan to depopulation by appearing to help save lives of women could be quite effective. Susanne Posel is the Chief Editor of Occupy Corporatism. Our alternative news site is dedicated to reporting the news as it actually happens; not as it is spun by the corporately funded mainstream media. You can find us on ourFacebook page. 