Zika: Update from Brazil: Towering Non-EvidenceBy Jon Rappoport A correspondent has offered a translation of an article that appeared in one of the major Sao Paulo newspapers, O Estado de So Paulo, on February 2nd, Pas tem 404 casos confirmados de microcefalia: It is obvious that no significant connection between microcephaly and the Zika virus has been found. Its not even close. So far, therefore, there is absolutely no reason to trumpet an epidemic of Zika. Doing so is quite insane, by any reasonable standard. Here are the principal facts in the article (after which Ill comment): * As of January 30, 2015, 4,783 suspected cases of microcephaly were reported in Brazil. * Of those 4,783 suspected cases of microcephaly, covering the entire country of Brazil, 3,670 are being investigated. * Of those 3,670, 404 cases have been confirmed as microcephaly or other alterations in the central nervous system of babies. * Of those 404 cases, 17 had a relationship with zika virus. * 98% of the 404 microcephaly cases come from the Northeast area of Brazil, and in that area, Pernambuco has the highest number of cases: 56. Now, lets take each one of these reported facts and examine it. First: 4,783 suspected cases of microcephaly in Brazil. Suspected is the operative word. This number means nothing, because it says nothing about confirmation. Its just a raw figure. 3,670 of these cases are being researched. Of these 3,670, 404 have been confirmed as microcephaly or other alterations in the central nervous system of the babies. The key word here is or. The researchers dont know how many of the 404 babies have microcephaly. At the very most, it would be 404. 404 cases of microcephaly in the whole country of Brazil, so far. That is not an epidemic. For example, every year in the US, there are 25,000 cases of microcephaly. And the literature is very clear about causes: any insult to the fetal brain during pregnancy can result in microcephaly. Severe malnutrition, falling down stairs, a blow to the stomach, a toxic street drug or medical drug or vaccine or pesticide, and so on. Of these 404 cases of (possible) microcephaly in Brazil, 17 babies have been found who have a relationship with the Zika virus. Its hard to be more vague. But for the sake of argument, lets say that in each of the 17, with a correct test done properly, the Zika virus was isolated. This finding does not even remotely approach proof that Zika is causing microcephaly. Its miles away from proof. Any honest researcher will tell you that. If Zika were the cause, researchers should have been able to find it in the overwhelming majority of the 404 babies. 17 out of 404 is, in fact, major evidence that Zika is not the cause. 98% of the 404 (possible) microcephaly cases come from the Northeast region of Brazil. Before jumping to any conclusions, realize that standards on reporting such cases differ from region to region. Up until now, there was no national focus on microcephaly. So there may be other cases from other regions. As for the 56 cases in Pernambuco, understand that the population of this area is 9.27 million people. It is significant to note that commercial agriculture is widespread in Pernambuco, and agriculture means toxic pesticidesan important causal factor in microcephaly, as Ive detailed in other articles. To sum up, researchers so far have found 404 cases of microcephaly in Brazil, and who knows how many of those are actually some other kind of nervous-system impairment. And of those 404 babies, they have found, at best, 17 cases where the Zika virus was present. And this is the epidemic that is shaking the world. The World Health Organization (WHO) is spearheading the baseless propaganda and the hysteria. At the very least, hundreds of employees from WHO should be immediately fired from their jobs, if not jailed. (To read about Jons mega-collection, Power Outside The Matrix, click here.) Image Credit The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here. Ahhh, but think of the opportunities to produce and to enforce vaccines upon us fearful unwashed masses! Sam Population control. And an easy exit for a very nervous Rio. Zika was isolated in Uganda in 1947. And suddenly, last April, it appeared in Brazil. How did it get there? By way of French Polonesia. Thats not epidemiology. Epidemiology is tracking the carriers of the disease, case by case, back to its source. For example, the index case of AIDS who carried the virus all over the world was an airline steward named Gaetan Dugas with sexual contacts wherever he landed. That is epidemiology. Suddenly appeared in Brazil by way of French Polonesia during the World Cup is pure speculation. Its guessing. So, please tell me about all the cases of microcephaly that zika virus (60-80% of cases have no symptoms whatsoever) has been causing in Uganda for all these years? Any? No? This is just weird. Chillax, there is no such thing as Zika or Ebola. TY for folks like you John KUDOS How the heck are we supposed to sell $2billion of anti Zika Vaccine if you keep on telling people the truth. Now, Brazilian government can justify to its people why the Olympics will be a flop, because a mosquito prevented people from all over the world to come to RioMakes sense. 