Top Bush Era CIA Official Just Confirmed the Iraq War Was Based On LiesBy Claire Bernish This past Tuesday, the former presidents intelligence briefer lent yet more plausibility to that theory in an interview on MSNBCs Hardball, making an admission that the Bush White House misrepresented intelligence reports to the public on key issues. Michael Morells stint with the CIA included deputy and acting director, but during the time preceding the US invasion of Iraq, he helped prepare daily intelligence briefings for Bush. One of those briefings, from October 2002, is an infamous examplein intelligence history as how not to compile a report. This National Intelligence Estimate, titled Iraqs Continuing Programs for Weapons of Mass Destruction, was the ostensibly flawed intelligence cited continuously by Bush supporters as justification to pursue a war of aggression against Iraq. However, this claim is dubious at best, and serves more as a smokescreen to lend credence to a president who was otherwise hellbent on revenge against Saddam Hussein, as evidenced in his statement a month before the report, After all, this is the guy who tried to kill my dad. In the Hardball interview, host Chris Matthews asked Morell about Cheneys notorious statement in 2003: We know he [Saddam Hussein] has been absolutely devoted to trying to acquire nuclear weapons. And we believe he has, in fact, reconstituted nuclear weapons. The following is the conversation that ensued: MATTHEWS: Was that true? MORELL: We were saying MATTHEWS: Can you answer that question? Was that true? MORELL: Thats not true. MATTHEWS: Well, whyd you let them get away with it? MORELL: Look, my job Chris MATTHEWS: Youre the briefer for the president on intelligence, youre the top person to go in and tell him whats going on. You see Cheney make this charge hes got a nuclear bomb and then they make subsequent charges he knew how to deliver itand nobody raised their hand and said, No thats not what we told him. MORELL: Chris, Chris Chris, whats my job, right? My job MATTHEWS: To tell the truth. MORELL: My jobno, as the briefer? As the briefer? MATTHEWS: Okay, go ahead. MORELL: As the briefer, my job is to carry CIAs best information and best analysis to the president of the United States and make sure he understands it. My job is to not watch what theyre saying on TV. Discussion continued: MATTHEWS: So youre briefing the president on the reasons for war, theyre selling the war, using your stuff, saying you made that case when you didnt. So theyre using your credibility to make the case for war dishonestly, as you just admitted. MORELL: Look, Im just telling you MATTHEWS: You just admitted it. MORELL: Im just telling you what we said MATTHEWS: They gave a false presentation of what you said to them. MORELL: On some aspects. On some aspects. And the host pushed just a little further: MATTHEWS: Thats a big deal! Do you agree? If they claimed they had a [nuclear] weapon, when you know they didnt. MORELL: Its a big deal. Its a big deal. Hes absolutely right, of course, and even further to that point, Morell made another admission of a direct misrepresentation: What they were saying about the link between Iraq and Al Qaeda publicly was not what the intelligence community had found. I think they were trying to make a stronger case for the war. Which the administration had to do, considering no such case existed. As a matter of fact, Cheneys statement directly conflicts with what the NIE actually stated, which is that the intelligence community only found a [lack of] persuasive evidence that Baghdad has launched a coherent effort to reconstitute its nuclear weapons program. Which is in line with the International Atomic Energy Agency report that came to the same conclusion: [W]e have to date found no evidence that Iraq has revived its nuclear weapons program. All of this solidifies what former UN Secretary General Kofi Annan resolutely stated about the US invasion of Iraq in 2004: I have indicated it was not in conformity with the UN charter. From our point of view and from the charter point of view it was illegal. The question most deserving an answer, and increasingly posed by the populace at large: If George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, and others in the administration, deliberately misled the public on false pretenses, directly contradicted intelligence information through misrepresentation, and ultimately initiated a wholly illegal invasion of Iraq that led to the deaths of well over 1 million civilian, non-combatants; WHY have they not been charged with war crimes? Claire Bernish writes for TheAntiMedia.org, where this first appeared. Tune in! The Anti-Media radio show airs Monday through Friday @ 11pm Eastern/8pm Pacific. Help us fix our typos: edits@theantimedia.org. 