Is There a Nuclear Arms Race Brewing in the Middle East?By Joshua Krause No doubt, its a good thing that a nuclear arms race never occurred in the Middle East. Granted, an arms race is never a good thing, but it would be especially disastrous in the Middle East, where ethnic and religious wars have been endemic for thousands of years, and where global superpowers like Russia and the US have vested interests. Unfortunately, this may not be the case in the near future. And by near future, I mean right now, because there are plenty of signs that suggest several nations in the Middle East are considering the construction of nuclear weapons. The most obvious candidate for a new nuclear program would be Saudi Arabia, which is frightening to think about when you consider all the sabre rattling theyve been up to recently. Its been rumored for several years that the Saudis have an agreement with Pakistan to deliver ready-made nukes upon request, but there hasnt been any clear evidence of this agreement. However, their foreign minister was recently asked by CNN about whether or not theyre planning to purchase nukes from Pakistan. His response was rather unsettling to say the least. When asked about nuclear cooperation with Pakistan, he told CNN on Tuesday:I am not going to get into details of discussions we have with foreign governments, and certainly not allied governments. Im sure you understand. Saudi Arabia is committed to two things. I always say two things we do not negotiate over:our faith and our security. He added: Saudi Arabia will do whatever it takes in order to protect our nation and our people from any harm. And I will leave it at that. The day before that conversation transpired, John Kerry went on CNN to warn Saudi Arabia about any such agreement, and to assure the world that there was nothing to worry about. You cant just buy a bomb and transfer it, he told Wolf Blitzer before adding Theres all kinds of (nonproliferation treaty) consequences. I mean, there are huge implications of that. And Saudi Arabia knows, I believe, that that is not going to make them safer, nor is it going to be easy, because the very things that Iran went through, they would then be subject to with respect to NPT and inspection and so forth. However, the Saudis dont care about these treaties, and neither does anyone else in the Middle East. The reason why has to do with our governments recent treaty with Iran. According to Zero Hedge: Unfortunately, one of the frightening ironies of the deal is that its causing some states to reconsider commitments they made to the US with regard to nuclear weapons development. In barely noticed testimony last month, Rep. Ed Royce, R-Calif., chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said the UAEs ambassador in Washington, Yousef al-Otaiba, had informed him in a telephone call that the country no longer felt bound by its previous nuclear agreement with the United States, AP reported last autumn. He told me, Your worst enemy has achieved this right to enrich. Its a right to enrich now that your friends are going to want, too, and we wont be the only country, Royce said in a phone interview. And more recently, an Israeli official has expressed concerns about the potential for a nuclear arms race among Arab countries, as a result of our nuclear agreement with Iran. On Sunday, in the latest sign that the crowning achievement of Obamas presidency is about to backfire in dramatic fashion, Israeli defense ministerMoshe Yaalon claimed Sunni Arab nations are moving ahead with plans to acquire nuclear weapons. We see signs that countries in the Arab world are preparing to acquire nuclear weapons, that they are not willing to sit quietly with Iran on brink of a nuclear or atomic bomb, he said, after meeting with Jordans King Abdullah. And he didnt stop there. If at a certain stage they feel confident, particularly economically, they are liable to make a break for the bomb, Yaalon claimed, referencing Irans windfall crude profits. 15 years is just around the corner, he warned, a reminder to the world that the deal to limit Iransnuclear enrichment has an expiration date. Its impossible to know for sure if the Iranians are really going to build nuclear weapons. The Israelis have been wagging their finger at the international community for decades, claiming that the Iranians are on the brink of building these weapons. And in that time, they havent built a single fissile bomb. Unfortunately, that doesnt mean that an arms race wont happen. Assume for a moment that Iran has no intention of going nuclear. All that matters is that their neighbors believe that theyre going to build them, and they will counter this imaginary threat by building their own weapons. At that point, Iran will have no choice but to renege on their promise to maintain a peaceful nuclear program. So, regardless of what Iran really intends to do, a nuclear arms race in the Middle East is all but inevitable at this point. Within the next 10 to 20 years, this hotly contested region is going to become even more unstable that any of us could have possibly imagined. Image Credit Joshua Krause is a reporter, writer and researcher at The Daily Sheeple. He was born and raised in the Bay Area and is a freelance writer and author. You can follow Joshuas reports at Facebook or on his personal Twitter. Joshuas website is Strange Danger. Dont blame this potential proliferation on the Iran/US agreement. That idea is totally ridiculous. Yes this situation has a spark that set it off, but that spark has been smoldering for 30 years or more and as the situation in the Middle East became more and more inflamed (thanks to GW Bush) it has flared into life. I am speaking of course of Israels acquisition of nuclear weapons long ago and its refusal to sign the non proliferation treaty. Yeah, its Bushs fault, all the worlds problems are the result of Bush. Obama hasnt done a thing to add to world unrest, especially in the Mideast. And Obama hasnt driven up the national debt, it does that automatically huh? Well thank you at least for acknowledging Bushs salient part in the current mess. However your comment about the national debt needs some revision. Under Obama for instance the annual budget deficits have been coming down dramatically. Debts grow because there is insufficient income to pay them down. That is the case with the US and it is because of tax relief for those who least need it, the 1% and their millionaire friends and that cannot be blamed on Obama. Its your friend once more dear old incompetent Bush! So the debt has been dropping under Obama. have you read the papers or listened to the news? Fewer people are working today and the debt has gone up just like you stated. Itd be foolish to think that there isnt a nuclear arms race int he Mideast, Obama feels that it is wrong for only a few nations to have nuclear bombs so he allowed Iran to proceed with theirs and they have sworn to wipe out Israel and The United States. Is There a Nuclear Arms Race Brewing in the Middle East? Middle East is technically goddammit ignorant, and cannot get past the age of the sword in metallurgy. They buy all their weaponry from outside, AK 47s, explosives, hummers, light armored vehicles, cell phones, ammunition, light artillery, Toyota Trucks, cotton wear, uniforms, military footwear, even warfare tactics, all imported, even the ISIS Ideologies seem to be part of Saudi versions of the many Muslim variants found in Islam. If nukes are employed it will be by Proxy Nations getting anxious to share in the oil riches under the feet of the human scum in the apparent genocide occurring as we speak. 