Chemtrails Exposed: Peter A. Kirby and James Corbett Discuss the New Manhattan Projectselfnews Post https://www.corbettreport.com/interviews-1013-peter-kirby-on-the-history-of-chemtrails/ Peter and James discuss the chemtrail spraying programs currently ravaging planet Earth. Kirbys latest paper is called Chemtrails Exposed: A History of the New Manhattan Project, originally published February 17, 2015 right here on selfnews Post. Among the revelations contained therein are those pertaining to New Manhattan Project progenitors Bernard Vonnegut and Admiral William Francis Raborn. Also discussed are the probable other agendas such as mind control and Nikola Teslas death ray. The market has spoken again. The public just aint buying what the climate alarmists are selling even at what is going to be an enormous loss for the producers of Merchants of Doubt. Couldnt happen to a better group of film-makers whose piece of expensive propaganda demonized researchers who adhere to the scientific method. Youd be much better informed if you read Russell Cooks excellent Merchants of Smear. Merchants of Doubt has earned $23,300 in the four theaters in which it opened on Friday. So that means Merchants of Doubt had the 314th best opening weekend ever for a documentary film in the United States! What an achievement! Read More: http://blog.heartland.org/2015/03/merchants-of-doubt-a-huge-flop-at-the-box-office/ By the way..Thank You Mr. Kirby. not only for your brilliance, but your willingness to stand up for yourself and for the rest of us. This info will be shared with my local State University. The author of that article is a public relations guy, read that as Professional Liar. Also, Heartland Institute is totally in bed with the neocon politicians the actual atmospheric scientists with ethics are pretty much all agreed that the planet is heating up. Ive been researching all this for years and am married to a biologist of 40 yrs who follows all of this science. He can poke holes all through your comments and the theories of those sold-out scientists who work for Monsanto, etc. as shills. They are paid well to lie. About half of all research papers are lies these days, according to people who went out and researched it. Fred S. Singer was an advocate for Big Tobacco and told the world that GW isnt happening. There are many like him and most are easily duped because they dont know science or any scientists. The truth is that there is about 98% consensus among NON-SHILLING, ETHICAL scientists that global warming is happening. Do you really think its normal that it has never gotten below zero degrees this winter in Alaska? I dont, Ive been there numerous times in winter and there was ALWAYS snow on the ground from about Oct. thru end of April but this year they had to save up their snow just to have the Idatarod opening ceremonies. Chemtrails are real Ive seen them (it is almost impossible for airplanes to create contrails now so NO they arent contrails) and Ive seen our woods dying due to these chemtrails,w hich have been tested and are known to contain aluminum, barium, dessicated red blood cells, genetically=engineered molds and much more. This is science, not supposition or theory, its FACT. I see them everyday, huge Xs in the sky. Im 60 y.o. and never saw them in my life until 5 yrs ago. The atmosphere is heating up due to goengineeringpressy and gov bob need their water money to win elections even thoegh 2/3rds of the voters didnt vote for the mouseoles. That is the backup lie funded by the oil/gas oligarchs: if you dont believe their propaganda that global warming is a hoax, blame it on the government. There is zero scientific evidence for chemtrails, and atmospheric science completely explains the existence of contrails. The only agency in the world capable of stopping fossil fuel pollution and greenhouse gas emissions are governments.so the propaganda ploy is to create distrust of government, so the Koch bros and others can continue to make billions by shifting the cost of health and environmental damage (8 million die each yr due to fossil fuels, hundreds of millions are diseased, and the net cost is trillions) to the public (in higher insurance premiums and taxes) and government. This is clever (to blame the source of a solution for creating the problem) but very very evil. See what the scientists in the field (ciimate and atmospheric) have to say and revolt against the propaganda: dont consent to be a useful idiot for the fossil fuel industry, which has sacrificed your health for more profits. Demand that the government protect human health and the environment by regulating fossil fuel emissions, which are slowly killing you. This is not alarmism but documentable fact. The market has not spoken (4 theaters?) and even if it did, that has nothing to do with science. If fact, the market is driven by news which often is mis or disinformation. Science adheres to a method which is independent of markets or propaganda campaigns. It is driven by evidence and scrutiny. According to the Berkeley Project, funded by the Koch brothers, the govt data on climate is accurate and the alarmist predictions are understated, according to the man who led the study, a climate skeptic who, being an honest scientists, was converted by the overwhelming evidence of global warming and the fact of human contribution via the pollution and greenhouse gases emitted by those funding the anti-climate science movement. Peoples! Listen to the scientists, not the oligarchs who are trying to brainwash you. The argument that the 10,000 climate scientists in 140 nations are all sell-outs (most make excellent salaries as academics) is absurd. And if you believe that the climate scientists worldwide have sold out, whom do you trust: even if you trust the Koch brothers, whose goal is to block government legislation to reduce pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, their own study showed that the government data is accurate, and that the claim of alarmism, if anything, has been understated. That is why the Koch brothers no longer openly fund anti-climate science propaganda but do it with dark money, undisclosed tens of millions to persuade the scientifically illiterate that there is a scientific debate about global warming, and thus block legislation to reduce the harm. Useful idiots abound in a world of propaganda. The anti-dote to propaganda is science. Stick with the science. Atmospheric scientists reject the alarmist claims of the chemtrail narrative. Who then is behind this myth? The same people who are funding the anti-climate science myth: the fossil fuel polluters whose agenda is to confuse the public with unscientific propaganda in order to block government from passing legislation to reduce pollution and greenhouse emissions. It is a clever ploy: only government has the ability to reduce pollution through legislation and regulation, so the program is to shift blame from the actual polluters (each yr 8 million die from fossil fuel pollution and hundreds of millions are sickened) to the one agency with the ability to do anything about it. Whom will you trust? The atmospheric scientists or the promoters of propaganda funded by the fossil fuel industry? Another function of such unscientific myths as chemtrails is to poison the well of legitimate conspiracy allegations based on evidence (for instance, the murders of JFK, MLK, and RFK and the fact that the govt lied to the 9/11 Commissionall based on evidence). Chemtrails both deflects outrage from the real culprits to the only organization which can address the lethal pollution which destroys our health and environment AND poisons the well of evidence based conspiracy allegations. I do not wish to discuss this AGAIN..just read what the atmospheric scientists say about those white trails in the stratosphere AND think about who benefits from turning the public from outrage against known polluters to outrage against the institutions capable of doing something about it. Evidence is NOT I see them spraying everyday. You do NOT. You are interpreting contrails based on being brainwashed. The world is full of nano-particles, alumininum, barium, etc. Yes, these particles are part of common household (food and sandpaper, for example) and industrial items. The government wants to kill me. Spraying in the stratosphere, if it were real (jet fuel emissions are real and do change the weather, as part of fossil fuel pollution), could not target populations since air currents move the vapors you see thousands of miles over months while all the while diluting and mostly falling into the ocean. There is evidence! There is not: atmospheric scientists dismiss the claims of amateurs as paranoia fueled by the kinds of articles posted by activist post and promoted by the fossil fuel oligarchs, like the Koch brothers, who seek to block government regulation by creating a public outcry about government spraying and lying about global warming. There are no chemtrails; global warming is real. We need a responsible government to act to regulate the fossil fuel industry to clean up the environment. Buying into hysterical myths thwarts that necessity and is therefore both gullible and dangerous. I will not responds, as I have written on this 50 times. If you dont believe me, go to the atmospheric scientists and see what they have to say. Thats where I get my information so that is my source: if you have the credentials, attack their science. If you dont, start to listen to those who spend their lives studying the atmosphere. I do not wish to discuss this again! Who are you? Al Gore? There is no debate, its settled cause I say so! Read my post. I do not ask you to believe me, as I am reporting what the atmospheric scientists are saying. I am telling you to find out what the atmospheric scientists say about chemtrails. No one fudged numbers on climate change. Many investigations have all concluded there was no attempt to manipulate the data. I urge you not to believe me but to check out the investigations. I urge you to reject the propaganda which has stopped you from investigating what the scientific experts have determined. If you dont trust the scientists, from all over the world, who in the hell do you trust: the Koch brothers, some right wing websites written by non-scientists. Among scientists, there is no debate. You can trust the scientists or you can dismiss them and trust the fossil fuel oligarchs who are funding the anti-science propaganda: its your choice. I will stick with the scienceyou can continue to promote the propaganda of those who have a profit motive in deceiving the public. Again, I do not ask that you believe meI have not spent a lifetime studying atmospheric or climate science, which is why I rely on actual scientists for my information. The claim that the worlds scientists are all frauds is, quite simply, too stupid to argue with. You can continue to be a useful idiot for the Koch brothers and other oligarchsor you can check out the science. You can be intelligent or stupid: your choice. Good post. Short and sweet! Anyone that uses the same old excuse of anyone that says differntly is funded by the oil companies simply shows that they are spewing ignorant propaganda. The REAL MONEY is the countless billions of dollars that is behind the pushing of the AGW fraud and the now obviously bogus glowbal warming agenda. It is a fact that the anti-climate science movement is funded by the oil and gas industry. Why anyone would call that an excuse is incomprehensible. . Oil and gas sector lobbying has more than tripled since 2004, reaching $168.3 million last year, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. Koch spent $12.3 million on lobbyists in 2009, ranking it fifth behind Exxon, Chevron Corp., ConocoPhillips Co. and BP PLC. scientificamerican.com Conservative billionaires used a secretive funding route to channel nearly $120m (77m) to more than 100 groups casting doubt about the science behind climate change, the Guardian has learned. The funds, doled out between 2002 and 2010, helped build a vast network of thinktanks and activist groups working to a single purpose: to redefine climate change from neutral scientific fact to a highly polarising wedge issue for hardcore conservatives.. the stable of donors represents a wide range of opinion on the American right. Increasingly over the years, those conservative donors have been pushing funds towards organisations working to discredit climate science or block climate action. Dark Money Funds Climate Change Denial Effort A Drexel University study finds that a large slice of donations to organizations that deny global warming are funneled through third-party pass-through organizations that conceal the original funder.In all, 140 foundations funneled $558 million to almost 100 climate denial organizations from 2003 to 2010. Meanwhile the traceable cash flow from more traditional sources, such as Koch Industries and ExxonMobil, has disappeared The study was published Friday in the journal Climatic Change.. scientificamerican.com In other words, those promoting anti-climate science have turned to funding that cannot be traced.why? Certainly, oil and gas funding, with the goal of thwarting government action to reduce pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, is real and hardly an excuse. Why do fossil fuel oligarchs oppose federal action on pollution and greenhouse gases? Because reducing pollution costs money and reduces profits. The goal is simple: to create wedge issues, such as global warming and chemtrails, to prevent government action. Meanwhile, each year, 8 million people die from fossil fuels and hundreds of millions suffer serious diseases. This is public health vs profits, and the fossil fuel industry spends hundreds of millions to prevent legislation which would cost them billions in order to protect human and environmental health. There is zero evidence that government funding for research on global warming is used for fraudulent purposes. The Koch funded Berkeley Project, headed by a climate skeptic, with the purpose of exposing government manipulation of data, found that the data is sound and that the claims of global warming are even worse than predicted. The lead investigator was so overwhelmed with the evidence that he converted to the global warming consensus and the cause of human activity, in an op ed in the NY Times. This was a private study that backfired, showing the government data to be accurate. Those claiming the government funding for research and the govt data are fake no longer can make that claim after the results of the Berkeley Project. Trust the government? I would trust the climate scientists of the world. Or you can trust the propaganda funded by the oil and gas oligarchs and the non climate scientists they pay to confuse you. Climate scientists all make excellent salaries (usually 100-200K a yr) as academics. It is absurd to claim that all of them have risked their academic positions and reputations to lie for the government. And why would the government lie about pollution and greenhouse gases? I can understand why those who cause this pollution would lieto protect their billions and maximize profits by shifting costs for the damage they do onto the public (higher insurance premiums and taxes). So you have a choice: trust the climate scientists of the world or trust the propaganda of the oil and gas oligarchs. You have chosen to shill for the Taxman. Pay your climate taxes and Uncle Al will save the planet. What you have forgotten is that most people distrust the Taxman, just like I distrust you. William, you are full of shit. I have no relationship to the government or the Taxman. I am reporting what climate scientists have learned. As it stands now, the cost of damage to human health and the environment (8 million die yearly from fossil fuels, 100 of millions are sickened, with trillions in healthcare costs and lost productivity) are shifted from the fossil fuel polluters to the public in higher insurance premiums, lost wages, poor health, and to the government in higher taxes to clean up the lethal pollution the fossil fuel oligarchs cause. I do not think there should be a tax on pollution and greenhouse gas emissions; I think they should be banned with stiff fines. Do not forget that taxes paid for this internet you are using, for gps, for many of the drugs that have been commercialized and may save your life, and for the highways you use everyday, the courts that protect your rights, the police, the schools, the firemen. I would rather pay taxes for these services than pay with my health and the degradation of the environment caused by the fossil fuel industry. Muller, the lead investigator for the Berkeley Project (which you seem to have ignored) was funded by the Koch brothers (who do not want to pay for the damage their businesses cause) to expose the fraudulent government data, but he found it was accurate. Therefore, while I will not accuse you of having a close relationship to the Koch brothers, I will point out that you are a useful idiot in their effort to continue to kill and cripple people with pollution, to cause extreme climate change with their CO2 emissions, and to destroy the environment.what you pay for this devastation is a tax for which you get nothing in return but poor health and a degraded environment. You may distrust me, but I am not asking you to trust me. Do you think I made up the op ed by climate scientist Muller. I am asking you to trust him and the other climate scientists who have indisputable evidence of global warming and only one logical cause: the highest CO2 concentration in 800,000 yrs. That is the science. You can trust the science or the propaganda of the fossil fuel oligarchs and serve as another useful idiot. The taxman has nothing to do with climate science. No one has a right to pollute the air and create extreme and dangerous climate change. I urge you to stop being a voluntary useful idiot for people who already have billions and want more, despite the harm they do. They want you to distrust the Taxman so they can continue to pollute and shift the cost to you. You ARE paying the Taxman, but he is a private billionaire who favors profits over your health. Calling me shill is a dishonest way to dodge the evidence. I urge you to read the Muller op ed and go thru the same process he did, based only on the evidence. What you have forgotten is that climate science has nothing to do with the Taxman but your health and your planet are harmed everyday by the ability of the fossil fuel oligarchs to use your air, your water, your soil as a free dump for their lethal pollution. Those who pollute should be thrown in jail for harming others. We dont need a Taxman; we need citizens to make these billionaires pay for the harm they do. I am shilling for science and the health of the planet. Whom are you shilling for: rich polluters who dont give a shit if their pollution kills you? 