Obama Declares Global CyberwarStephen Lendman, Contributor Strategy includes homeland tyranny, fear-mongering, saber rattling, hot wars, proxy ones, drone ones, domestic political ones, geopolitical ones, financial ones, anti-populist ones, sanctions, subversion, sabotage, targeted assassinations, mass murder, cyberwar, and more. In May 2009, Obama prioritized cybersecurity. He called cyber-threats one of the most serious economic and national security challenges we face as a nation. Americas economic prosperity in the 21st century will depend on cybersecurity. He ordered a top-to-bottom review. A Cyberspace Policy Review report followed. He waged cyberwar on Iran. He did so cooperatively with Israel. In spring 2010, Iranian intelligence discovered Stuxnet malware contamination. The computer virus infected its Bushehr nuclear facility. At the time, operations were halted indefinitely. Israel was blamed. Washington was involved. Had the facility gone online infected, Irans entire electrical power grid could have been shut down. A more destructive virus called Flame malware is known. Internet security experts say its 20 times more harmful than Stuxnet. Irans military-industrial complex is targeted. So is its nuclear program. Maximum disruption is planned. Obama supports draconian cybersecurity bills. Passage threatens constitutional freedoms. Obamas waging war on humanity. Hes doing it multiple ways. Last October, he signed an executive order. It expanded military authority. It authorized cyberattacks. It redefined defense. Doing so lawlessly legitimizes aggression. In November, Presidential Policy Directive 20 followed. Its secret. It set guidelines for confronting cyberspace threats. Last fall, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta warned of a cyber Pearl Harbor. It could cause physical destruction and loss of life, he said. It could paralyze and shock the nation and create a new profound sense of vulnerability. US officials never lack for hyperbole. Fear-mongering is longstanding policy. So are Big Lies, false flags, and other pretexts for wars, other military actions, and disruptive ones. Cyberwar capability adds to Americas arsenal. Preemption adds another dirty tactic. In early February, US media reports headlined stepped-up cyberwar. Preemption is prioritized. Nation states, organizations, and individuals are fair game. US Cyber Command (USCYBERCOM) has full operational control. Its a cyber hit squad. Its part of the US Strategic Command. Its based at Fort Meade, MD. General Keith Alexander serves as National Security Agency (NSA) director and US Cyber Command head. The New York Times cited a secret legal review. It affords Obama sweeping preemptive cyberattack powers. It permits him to order a preemptive strike if the United States detects (allegedly) credible evidence of a major digital attack looming from abroad. His word alone is policy. Corroborating evidence isnt needed. Efforts to protect classified and proprietary information are increasing. The Washington Post said wireless and technology giants are battling over a plan to create super Wi-Fi networks. The Wall Street Journal said Google, Microsoft and Amazon are competing to control cloud computing business. The Christian Science Monitor said preemptive cyberwar entered Americas arsenal. It nugded up along side other approved tactics and techniques. New policies govern how intelligence agencies work. Theyve been unrestrained before. Theyll have greater powers now. The New York Times said theyll be able to carry out searches of faraway computer networks for signs of potential attacks on the United States and, if the president approves, attack adversaries by injecting them with destructive code even if there is no declared war. Rules of engagement are classified. Effectively there are none. Cyber-warriors are freewheeling. Theyre unrestrained. Theyll operate anywhere globally. China is a target of choice. Its Americas main economic and geopolitical competitor. An unnamed US official said new cyberwar strategy is far more aggressive than anything used or recommended before. The gloves are off. Anything goes. Major disruptions can occur without firing a shot. Military and/or civilian power grids can be crippled. So can financial systems and communications networks. Another unnamed US official said cyberweapons are so powerful that they should be unleashed only by presidential order. Exceptions would be tactical strikes. Examples include disabling command and control as well as ground radar ahead of conventional strikes. At the same time, most cyberoperations are presidential prerogatives. Expect Obama to take full advantage. Extrajudicial operations are prioritized. Rule of law principles are spurned. Operational procedures have been in development for over two years. Theyre headlined now. They coming out when cyberattacks more often target US companies and critical infrastructure. An unnamed US power station was crippled for weeks. The New York Times, Washington Post, and Wall Street Journal reported cyberattacks. Obama prioritizes preemption. Doing so has no legal standing. Self-defense alone is justified. Acting on suspicions without evidence is aggression. New rules serve Washington. Lawyers get marching orders. Theyre well paid to subvert accepted legal standards. Doing so doesnt change them. What constitutes reasonable and proportionate force resides in the eye of the aggressor. New guidelines exclude the Pentagon from defending US companies or individuals without presidential authority. Doing so is Homeland Securitys prerogative. The FBI has investigatory authority. Cybersecurity legislation remains stalled in Congress. Expect stepped up efforts for passage. Doing so will more greatly comprise freedom. Full-blown tyranny approaches. Its a hairs breadth away. Whistleblowers are targeted. Dissent is endangered. Theres no place to hide. Big Brothers expanding exponentially. Cyber-preemption adds greater police state power. On February 3, a Washington Post editorial headlined Cyberwar, out of the shadows, saying: US Cyber Command is expanding exponentially. Doing so is indicative of how conflict is moving toward center stage for the military, a domain similar to land, sea, air and outer space. Its heading America toward unchallenged dominance. In May 2000, the Pentagons Joint Vision 2020 called for full spectrum dominance over all land, surface and sub-surface sea, air, space, electromagnetic spectrum and information systems with enough overwhelming power to fight and win global wars against any adversary. Doing so includes nuclear weapons use preemptively. Non-nuclear countries and adversaries are fair game. Cyber Command includes: (1) Combat mission forces cooperatively with military units. (2) Protection forces to defend Pentagon networks. (3) National mission forces to head off threats to critical infrastructure. Theyll operate outside America. Theyll function anywhere if authorized. Theyll strike US adversaries preemptively. Rules of engagement arent clear. Public information is limited. Sunlight is the best disinfectant. Policy need generous doses. If conflict in cyberspace is underway, said the Post, then it is important to sustain support for the resources and decisions to fight it, and that will require more candor. Expect little forthcoming from the most secretive administration in US history. Obamas first term prioritized homeland repression and lawless aggression. Imagine what he has in mind for term two. Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.His new book is titled How Wall Street Fleeces America: Privatized Banking, Government Collusion and Class War.Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour/ 