FBI Push Local Police Secrecy over Massive Cell Phone SweepsMelissa Melton In part, this is due to restricted information about the extent of this surveillance activity. According to the Associated Press, the Obama Administration has been actively advising police departments to refuse disclosure about certain cell phone surveillance technologies, including the widely used StingRay device, even in routine state records requests. Evidently, the StingRay technology allows law enforcement to trick cell devices into sharing identifying personal and location data with them that would ordinary be sent to communications companies and require request procedures. Instead, police are bypassing company assistance and collecting unique information on suspects, persons of interests, and as the AP reports they can even sweep up basic cellphone data from entire neighborhoods, all without any court orders or oversight. According to the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC): Thats due in large part to secrecy institutionalized by agreements between the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and manufacturers, such as Harris Corp. In the Harris Corporations FCC authorization, which regulates wireless equipment capable of interfering with other communications, is an odd requirement mandating that police using the Stingray and other similar technologies coordinate with the FBI before acquiring and operating the equipment. In short, the local law enforcement entanglement with the feds has produced often extreme secrecy and contributed to a public almost wholly ignorant about the extent of surveillance taking place in modern society. Many police departments, under pressure from the FBI and Obama Administration, have refused to give information about StingRay even in court testimony while public information releases regarding this surveillance have thus far been heavily redacted. In their special report for the Associated Press, authorsJack Gillum and Eileen Sullivan wrote: While many departments have been obediently tight-lipped about the use and operation of StingRay technology, some information has come out. The ACLU reported on a Florida case in which a law enforcement officer testified that he quite literally stood in front of every door and window with his Stingray to track the phones inside a large apartment complex. The signal tracking is used to gather often precise information about the location of the people inside. Further, several hundred pages of information about Stingray and its cell tower-simulator counterparts Triggerfish and Digital Analyzers have come to light as the result of an EPIC lawsuit against the FBI. This heavily redacted information [PDF link] acknowledges an FBI training program in cell site simulator devices and a bit about their legal classification as pen register devices (which can record/decode identifying information about transmitted dialing, routing, addressing or signalling information p. 61). FBI officials have, for their part, essentially argued that the use of the technology must remain secret for reasons of national security. One such FBI special agent, Bradley Morrison, gave an affidavit supporting the suppression of information in an Arizona case, claiming that revelations about the surveillance technology would keep them from stopping the bad guys. Morrison testified that public disclosure would result in the FBIs inability to protect the public from terrorism and other criminal activity because through public disclosures, this technology has been rendered essentially useless for future investigations. Both the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) have criticized the prima facie violations of Constitutional rights and pushed for release of information about this level of surveillance through lawsuits and challenges. An ACLU case forced the release of some key information on the use of StingRay in Florida only last week, even as various law enforcement authorities attempted to keep information secret. The ACLU celebrated the unsealing of THIS transcript which the FBI had attempted to keep secret. Just one small excerpt of that transcript, from p. 2, gives some food for thought about the state of privacy in 2014: A fast-draining cell phone battery can be a dead giveaway to the use of this tracking and imitating technology. Sounds like some dystopic Orwellian Hollywood thriller plot, but instead, this is modern day police investigation reality here in the good ole U.S. of A. and people still argue that we have privacy in this country. Melissa Melton is a writer, researcher, and analyst for The Daily Sheeple, where this first appeared, and a co-creator of Truthstream Media. Wake the flock up! 