Attorneys representing the Tribe of Abraham filed suit against God in New York's Southern District Court Monday, citing 117 specific instances of breach of covenant. Lawyers for the Children of Israel, who are suing the Lord for $4.2 trillion. The Israelites are seeking $4.2 trillion in punitive and compensatory damages. 'My client, the Children of Israel, entered into this covenant with the Defendant in good faith. They were assured, in writing, that in exchange for their exclusive worship of Him, they would be designated His chosen people and, as such, would enjoy His divine protection and guidance for eternity,' said Marvin Sachs, the Manhattan attorney bringing the suit on behalf of the Israelites. 'Yet, practically from the moment this covenant was signed, the Defendant has exhibited a blatant and willful disregard for its terms.' According to Sachs, the Israelites have not received the protection they were promised in the covenant. 'Despite the presence of numerous 'chosen people' clauses throughout this covenant, my client has suffered countless tragedies over the past 5,000 years, from the destruction of the Holy Temple in Jerusalem to the Spanish Inquisition to the Holocaust,' Sachs said. 'Does that sound like protection to you? Clearly, the Creator had no intention of honoring His legal and binding agreement with us from the start.' Continued Sachs: 'The covenant also states that the plaintiff is be entitled to all the lands of the Earth. This, too, has not occurred. Furthermore, it states that the plaintiff will become more numerous than the dust thereof. This has not occurred, either, assuming, of course, that the world contains more than 14 million particles of dust.' Sachs then produced a Torah scroll and said, 'I was raised to believe that this is more than just a piece of paper. What about Him?' Court officers visited the Defendant atop Mount Sinai early this morning, serving Him with papers and setting the legal machinery in motion. Though He has declined comment, lawyers in His employ have already cited multiple points of contention with the Israelite argument, questioning the authenticity of the thousand-year-old hand-inscribed documents and taking issue with the selection of New York, 'a city of Israelites,' as the trial site. A disputed section of the covenant, which promises the plaintiff divine protection and providence. Kevin Harrigan, chief legal counsel for the Lord, called a press conference Tuesday to read a personal statement from his Client. 'Where was Marvin Sachs when I created the Heavens and the Earth? Where was Marvin Sachs when I laid the cornerstone of creation, and all the morning stars sang together? Can Marvin Sachs bind the influences of the Pleiades and loose the bands of Orion? Can Marvin Sachs call forth the snow or the small rain or the great storm?' the statement read. 'He should not be so quick to sit in judgment, he who knows not the ordinances of Heaven nor their dominion of the Earth.' Added Harrigan: 'We'll agree to minor malfeasance. The Creator pays you a token $15,000 settlement, plus your filing fees, and we go easy on you.' Despite the Lord's confidence, the Israelites say they have a case. 'For 5,760 years, the plaintiff has honored their side of the contract, worshipping the Defendant with total devotion. But in return, they have gotten bupkes,' Sachs said. 'They trusted Him to protect them, and He threw them to everyone from the Egyptians to the Cossacks to the Nazis to the Palestinians. I'd have a hard time believing that anyone even remotely familiar with the plaintiff's history would argue that they're not victims of detrimental reliance.' Harrigan responded that God's case is clear under the provisions of New York's commercial code. 'We have yet to determine whether the Jews are arguing for the Covenant of Abraham, which covers homeland and birthright issues, the Davidic Covenant, under which they say they were guaranteed a Messiah, or some combination of the two,' Harrigan said. 'But one thing is clear: Standard assumptions for any legal contract in this district specifically state that the Defendant is not responsible for acts of God.' Continued Harrigan: 'I must also point out that the plaintiff has been given a homeland and offered at least one viable Messiah. If the plaintiff chooses not to accept them for whatever reason, it demonstrates that no meeting of the minds was truly possible and that they acted in bad faith, and the covenant is therefore rendered null and void.' Harrigan went on to note that the Lord has not ruled out filing a breach-of-covenant countersuit against the Israelites, claiming that they 'have failed to worship the Lord in an acceptably faithful manner.' Among the evidence cited: a 70 percent rise in interfaith marriage among Jews since 1900 and last year's turnout of just 36 percent at worldwide Yom Kippur services. As of press time, the Israelites were moving forward with their case, undaunted by the fact that the Supreme Deity has never lost a trial. 'My client has been searching for answers for a long time,' Sachs said. 'And they will continue to search for answers and seek the truthno matter what the cost in legal fees.' 