FCC clears Google of wrongdoing over spying on Americans, contradicts federal judgeMadison Ruppert, Contributor With Google set to start monitoring environmental information for targeted advertisements, gain Regina Dugan of DARPA, and even further expand their Big Brother policies all while maintaining a tight relationship with the government, this decision is somewhat par for the course. That being said, this finding was still somewhat surprising since a federal judge previously ruled that Google could, in fact, be held liable for violating federal wiretapping legislation, which would thus potentially open Google up to lawsuits from individuals seeking damages. It was not only a judge who found Googles claims to be laughable, in fact Joel Burin, the Bureau of Consumer and Governmental Affairs chief, wrote in 2010, Googles behavior also raises important concerns. Whether intentional or not, collecting information sent over Wi-Fi networks clearly infringes on consumer privacy. In an order made public on Monday (which you can read below with a great deal of redacted information, unfortunately), reflecting a decision made by the commission on Friday, it is said that Google did not violate any wiretapping laws when they snooped on open wireless networks with their Google Street View mapping vehicles. The FCC said that between 2008 and 2010, Googles Street View cars collected names, addresses, telephone numbers, URLs, passwords, e-mail, text messages, medical records, video and audio files, and other information from internet users in the United States. Would you be comfortable knowing that a corporation like Google is collecting your passwords and medical records? I certainly would not. The FCC decided to fine Google a mere $25,000 hardly a drop in the bucket considering Google pulled in $10.58 billion for the fourth quarter of 2011 alone for actively interfering and failing to cooperate with their investigation. The commission claimed that legal precedents and the fact that an unnamed Google engineer refused to speak to the FCC, citing his Fifth Amendment rights, meant that Google was not guilty of wiretapping. Based on careful review of the existing record and applicable law, the bureau will not take enforcement action, the FCCs enforcement bureau stated in their 25-page order. The FCC originally started their investigation after the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) urged the agency to carry out an investigation in a 2010 letter. Google claims that they did absolutely nothing against the law by sniffing Wi-Fi networks and capturing the private data belonging to Americans, and the fact that the FCC supported this claim is especially troubling for anyone who uses an open Wi-Fi network either at home or at a business offering free wireless Internet. One must wonder if that would mean that a hacker could steal information from unencrypted Wi-Fi networks without worrying about any consequences, as the decision makes it seem like such a thing could very well be expected in the future. Then again, based on the fact that corporations and average people are subjected to two entirely different justice systems, I would personally be surprised if an individual was treated the same as Google. The argument that won the FCC over did not hold up in any way when it was given to U.S. District Judge James Ware of California. Judge Ware said that the lawyers who were representing the public had presented facts sufficient to state a claim for violation of the Wiretap Act, thus making Google liable for potential wiretapping damages. Google has claimed that they did not know they were stealing the private information from unencrypted Wi-Fi networks across around a dozen countries until German privacy authorities discovered what was going on and demanded Google reveal what their Street View vehicles were collecting. The FCC stated that Google collected and stored encrypted communications sent over unencrypted Wi-Fi networks, but they did not find evidence showing that Google accessed the information they hijacked, although the chances of them being able to prove that are slim to none, especially considering Googles non-compliance with the investigation. This fact is highlighted by the FCC pointing out that the unnamed Google engineer made it impossible to determine in the course of our investigation whether Google did make any use of the encrypted communications that it collected. In other words, they didnt find evidence because they couldnt find any, not because there was a lack of evidence. They were simply blocked from actually examining the evidence. Google claimed in 2010 that the entire fiasco was a mistake and that they only stole fragments of private information, all of which they say they havent reviewed. While the Wiretap Act, as amended in 1986, specifically states that it is not wiretapping to intercept or access an electronic communication made through an electronic communication system that is configured so that such electronic communication is readily accessible to the general public, Judge Ware said that this only applied to traditional radio services, not unencrypted Wi-Fi networks. In other countries, authorities have not been so ready to say that Google was not at fault for their activities. Indeed, in Canada, France and the Netherlands they have ruled that Google was in violation of their laws while back in 2010 the American Federal Trade Commission (FTC) opened an investigation and closed it without taking any action whatsoever against Google. This FCC decision sets a somewhat troubling precedent and it is anyones guess how this will be used in the future, however, none of those ways are positive in my view. This just goes to show, if you are still using unencrypted wireless networks or failing to encrypt your Internet traffic on public Wi-Fi, youre setting yourself up to have your information stolen. If you expect the government to do anything about it, youll likely be sorely disappointed. Id love to hear your opinion, take a look at your story tips, and even your original writing if you would like to get it published. Please email me at Admin@EndtheLie.com Please support our work and help us start to pay contributors by doing your shopping through our Amazon link or check out some must-have products at our store. This article first appeared at End the Lie where you can also find the court document related to this article. Madison Ruppert is the Editor and Owner-Operator of the alternative news and analysis database End The Lie and has no affiliation with any NGO, political party, economic school, or other organization/cause. He is available for podcast and radio interviews. Madison also now has his own radio show on Orion Talk Radio from 8 pm 10 pm Pacific, which you can find HERE. If you have questions, comments, or corrections feel free to contact him at admin@EndtheLie.com linkwithin_text=Related Articles: 