What Will The Global Economy Look Like After The Great Reset?By Brandon Smith A few goals are certain and openly admitted. The globalists ultimately want to diminish or erase the U.S. dollar as the world reserve currency. They most definitely are seeking to establish the International Monetary Funds Special Drawing Rights basket system as a replacement for the dollar system; this plan was even outlined in the Rothschild-run magazine The Economist in 1988. They want to consolidate economic governance, moving away from a franchise system of national central banks into a single global monetary authority, most likely under the IMF or the Bank for International Settlements. And, they consistently argue for the centralization of political power in the name of removing legislative and sovereign barriers to safer financial regulation. These are not theories of fiscal change, these are facts behind the globalist methodology. When the IMF mentions the great global reset, the above changes are a part of what they are referring to. That said, much of my examinations focus on these macro-elements; but what about the deeper mechanics of the whole scheme? What kind of economic system would we wake up to on a daily basis IF the globalists get exactly what they want? This is an area in which the elites rarely ever comment, and I can only offer hypothetical scenarios. I am basing these scenarios on the measures that the establishment most obsessively chases. If they want a particular social or economic change badly enough, the signs become obvious. Here is what the world would probably look like after a global economic reset Who knows what the trigger will be? There are so many potential catalysts for economic instability that there is no way to make a prediction. The only thing that is certain is that one or more of these catalysts will be triggered. A Saudi depeg from the U.S. dollar, a large-scale terrorist attack, a general rout in stock markets due to a loss of faith in central bank policy, a confrontation between Eastern and Western powers. It doesnt really matter much. All of it is designed to produce one outcome chaos. To which the globalists will offer order, their particular order using their particular solutions as objective mediators. In our highly interdependent system in the West in which more than 80 percent of the population has been domesticated and is psychologically incapable of self-reliance, it is very likely that a disruption of normal supply chains and services would result in considerable poverty and death. Such a threat would invariably lead frightened and unprepared people to demand increased government controls so that they can return to the level of comfort they have grown accustomed to within the grid. One important factor to note is the rationale globalists will offer for increased centralization and control in the hands of a few. In my article, The Linchpin Lie: How Global Collapse Will Be Sold To The Masses, I study the clever narrative of Rand Corporation member John Casti and his Linchpin Theory. In Castis theory (more propaganda than theory), collapse is inevitable in what he calls overly complex systems. The more independent elements within any system, the more chance there is for unpredictable events that lead to supposed disaster. Ostensibly, the solution would be to streamline all systems and remove the free-radicals. That is to say, complete centralization is the answer. What a surprise. In a post-reset world, the elites will argue that the banks and bankers are not necessarily to blame. Rather, they will accuse the system of being too complex and chaotic, leaving itself open to greed, stupidity and overall unconscious sabotage. The fact that the crisis was engineered from the very beginning will never be mentioned. Centralization will be championed as the cure-all to the barbaric relic of complexity. Almost all other changes to our economic environment will stem from this single lie. You are going to see long-standing financial institutions sacrificed in the name of rehabilitating the global system. Do not assume that certain major banks (Deutsche Bank?) will not be brought down, or that certain central banks will not be toppled (Federal Reserve) as the reset progresses. Also do not assume even that certain geopolitical structures will not be brought into disarray (European Union). In the push towards total globalization and one world economic governance, the elites have no loyalty to any single corporation, nation or even central bank. They will chop off almost any appendage if they can achieve a one world system in the trade. What this means on a micro-level is the activation of bail-ins; that is to say, the legalized confiscation of bank accounts, pension funds, stock holdings, etc. as a method for prolonging a collapse event. We have seen this already to some extent in Europe, and it will happen in the U.S. eventually. Some people (socialists/communists) may even cheer the action as the end of capitalism and a step toward economic harmonization; which is easy for them to cheer for since most of them have never worked hard enough to earn property or assets worth confiscating. Everyone who is aware expects this, but it is important to realize that currency devaluation will probably occur across the board in every region of the world. Some currencies will simply be hit harder than others. The dollar is a primary target of the globalists and WILL be brought down. It wont disappear, but it will become progressively irrelevant on the global stage. If the projections of The Economist are the correct timetable, then the end of the dollar will be well underway before 2018. While the initial scenario we face in America will be one of stagflation, many necessities and the means to produce those necessities will skyrocket in cost. There may not be inflation in every sector of the economy because imploding demand could offset some of the effects of falling currency value, but there will be extreme inflation in the areas that hurt common people most. Despite all the failings and control mechanisms involved in fiat money, there are still worse systems to be had. Last month more than 100 executives from the worlds largest financial institutions met privately at the Times Square office of Nasdaq Inc. to discuss the future of money; more specifically a software apparatus called Blockchain. The goal is to implement Blockchain as a medium to fully digitize monetary transactions around the world and in a way that is traceable and foolproof. In other words, the goal is put an end to all transactions involving physical cash. The establishment of a cashless society would mark the end of all privacy in trade. Even supposedly anti-centralization digital currencies like Bitcoin are hindered by the blockchain feature, which requires the tracking of ALL transactions in order for the currency to function. While methods for anonymity could be argued, the fact of the matter is, digital currency by its very nature is a destroyer of the truly private trade offered by cash and barter. When all trade is tracked, and all savings digitized, whoever owns the keys to the core of the blockchain will have the power to wreak havoc on the life of any participant at will. To be sure, the blockchain that the elites have in mind will never allow for anonymous transactions, because digital currency is not about anonymity or convenience, it is about control. Corrupt government is the tool by which globalists can extort goods and labor from a population as well as exert force to subdue rebellion. It is highly unlikely that the global reset will result in a collapse of government. On the contrary, it is usually during economic collapse that governments grow in power to the point of totalitarianism. There will always be a new currency mechanism or financial structure to replace the old, and the globalists will always have a way to pay off armies and useful idiots to do their bidding. No one should be counting on the idea that the elites face collapse as we face collapse. This is naive. The elites created the collapse; they plan to be ready to use it to their advantage. After the reset and the opening crisis it is probable that resource allocation will become a major issue. Production of goods on the massive scale seen today will not ever be allowed to return if the elites have their way. This will create a perpetual lack of supply (by design). The only methods for dealing with lost production on an industrial level would be to either encourage localized production in every community, or to force people to reduce their standard of living and demand in the extreme. The elites will certainly press for the latter. Localized production in every community would kill any means of financial control the globalists might have on a population. In fact, I believe they will attempt to make any local production impossible, first through taxation so high that only the largest still-surviving corporations can afford to operate, and second, by confiscation of raw resources needed to manufacture goods on a scale that would grow wealth for a community. The government will claim that such resources must be managed by the authorities for the good of everyone rather than wasted by independent businesses in the pursuit of personal wealth. You wont even see children running lemonade stands, let alone common people operating small factories, farms and store fronts. Eventually, they will also have to limit or outlaw barter and alternative currencies in order for the digitized economy to work. No matter how much information is released which completely contradicts the fraud of man-made global warming, the establishment continues to charge full steam ahead with the creation of a carbon-based economic model. Why? Because the idea of the carbon footprint is the ultimate weapon for domination. A carbon tax is a tax on life itself. There is no way around it. In my article Ecological Panic: The New Rationale For Globalist Cultism I dissect the elitist think-tank propaganda of Council on Foreign Relations member Timothy Snyder. Snyder argues in his writings that nearly all man-made disasters are a product of high or extravagant living standards. Though his definition of high living standards is rather vague, I expect that he sees the vast majority of Western society as people that need to be taken down several pegs. He also argues that tyrants and mass murderers often ignore scientific authority in the pursuit of greater productive wealth, and that people who ignore climate science are contributing to future holocausts. So, to summarize, we all must stop producing, stop pursuing personal wealth and achievement and sacrifice our own individual progress in the name of progress for the collective and the safety of the planet. Like Casti, Snyders narrative requires the populace to bow down to a central authority in the name of the greater good. And surely it is mere coincidence that the globalists these men work for will be at the helm of that central authority. Remember, in order to fully centralize, the elites must streamline. This does not only mean streamlining economic governance, but also streamlining the size of the system they seek to dictate. The larger and more diverse the system, the harder it is to wrap your tentacles around it. This means greatly diminished production, but also by extension greatly diminishing the population. Population controls then become vital. If the production of carbon can be taxed and administrated, then the production of life can be taxed and administrated. The establishment becomes godlike; the purveyor of all means of sustainment. The carbon bogeyman can be used to frighten the now crisis weary public into complete sublimation, for if mere carbon can cause the end of the world as we know it, then people, by their very existence, become a threat to the future that must be regulated. Anthropogenic climate change is THE model the elites must assert if they hope to convince the citizenry that a concrete ceiling on production and population is acceptable. If we ever get to the point where human society becomes so self-loathing as to seek its own enslavement and destruction through carbon controls, it may be a thousand years before we ever see freedom again. All of the dangers described above are NOT set in stone. Some may claim that the end is nigh these people are idiots. The end is never nigh. Humanity has faced calamity after calamity for generations; our calamity just happens to be historically epic by comparison. It is not the last calamity. Centuries from now, there will be new disasters and new idiots telling everyone the end is nigh. Through it all, courageous people have risen to the occasion. Some are successful and some are not, but we do not live in a New World Order, yet, and that is saying something. Today is nowhere near as terrible as tomorrow could be if we do not act accordingly. The globalist reset needs a trigger, a crisis which admittedly we do not have the ability to avoid. But, the reset also depends on the right people in place to rebuild the system after the crisis unfolds. Here is where the future can be determined. Whoever is left standing after the opening salvo will have a choice: to hide and hope for the best, or to fight for the position to choose who builds tomorrow. Will it be the psychotic globalist cabal, or will it be free people of conscience? It may not seem like it now, but the end result is up to us. Image Credit You can read more from Brandon Smith at his site Alt-Market.com. If you would like to support the publishing of articles like the one you have just read, visit our donations page here. We greatly appreciate your patronage. You can contact Brandon Smith at: brandon@alt-market.com **All of the dangers described above are NOT set in stone. Some may claim that the end is nigh these people are idiots. The end is never nigh. Humanity has faced calamity after calamity for generations; our calamity just happens to be historically epic by comparison. It is not the last calamity. ** Speculation on the authors part. He doesnt know but wants you to believe he knows what he is talking about. Offer an alternative point or be damned and forgotten. Alternate point= OPPOSITE VIEW. Think much? Bitocin and other cyrptocurrencies would do just fineand do you really think people would give a them about what governements and media say after the collaspepeople will choose no demand a money system that has nothing to do with FIAT The only way Bitcoin and any other alternative dependent on the internet would be allowed to survive and spread is if they are useful for the new elite paradigm of a global cashless digital system of exchange. The timing of Bitcoins emergence and the support given by the MSM and big bankster players such as Larry Summers and Goldman Sachs is the writing on the wall. Its doesnt matter whats allowed the open source tech of Bitcoin and the blockchain makes it permission-less and the reason this internet protocol won out over the AOL-like closed garden internet was cause it allowed people to use it how they saw fit. People act like shutting off the internet is that easy, without taking to account that they(TPTB/not so elites) need the internet too. Shutting the donw the internet of a populace that needs to be distracted, and very cynical would be dangerous to the elites. The internet wouldnt need to be shut down, only targeted and surgically censored and dismantled as has been done in China, Russia, is underway in Europe, and creeping here in the US. Another way is blanket surveillance that is used to shut off digital access to banking, any and all electronic transactions, smart meters, harassment as was done to Tea Party via IRS audits, etc. Summers is on the board of 21 Inc, a startup designing software for apps that will be used to allow bitcoin payments on smartphones (TPTBs currently favored tracking devices). They can try surgically targeted censorship but that wont be effective when they are so many vpns and data scrambling and encryption software to mitigate that and censorship in China and Russia have and will continue to fail because these populations have a healthy distrust of there governments and use above said techs to thwart censorship The great firewall of china is a joke lets not kid ourselves. Summers on board of 21 inc who cares they cant stop you from actually transacting and thats whats important and great with Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies in general. All this again and again ignores Russia! Why do you think the western parasites are so hell-bent on destroying an independent Russia? Because Russia affords us an alternative to their plans! And that is why the west needs Russia destroyed and on its knees, for otherwise when the engineered circumstances in the west come to bear, people will flee to Russia! We in the west can only hope that Russia will keep a door open for us. Voluntarily settling in the most inhospitable regions of Sibiria and the Russian far east will become not only become much more appealing, but uniquely compelling in comparison to the horrifically wretched existence the western parasites have planned for us. There we can be put to work building roads, railways, gas-pipelines and entire cities. Cities fit to live in with real families and without the proscribed homosexualism of the west. This is the real threat Russia poses to the unified one-world system: being an alternative! 