UN Defends NATOs Premeditated Genocide in SyriaAs long-planned sectarian bloodbath unfolds, UN deceitfully labels atrocities as reprisals. As early as 2007, it was reported that the US, Israel, and Saudi Arabia, together were not only organizing, funding, training, and arming militants directly linked to Al Qaeda to be used against Syria and Iran, but knew well in advance that by doing so, they would trigger an unprecedented cataclysmic conflict driven by sectarian extremism. Not only was such sectarian violence expected, it was desired ahead of redrawing a new map for the Middle East one that favored Western corporate-financier and geopolitical interests, while keeping the region weak, divided, and infighting. Now, the UN is feigning indignation over the inevitable, increasingly overt sectarian nature of the so-called Free Syrian Army and its so-called rebellion. Entire communities of minorities face extermination. To blunt the impact this will have on public opinion, UN special adviser on the prevention of genocide, Adama Dieng has preemptively stated: I am deeply concerned that entire communities risk paying the price for crimes committed by the Syrian government. According to Reuters article, U.N. anti-genocide envoy: Syria minorities face reprisal risk, the genocide NATO and its allies are arming, funding, and willfully fueling is merely reprisals. What Reuters doesnt report is that US, Saudi, and Lebanese officials had for years warned that US foreign policy, started under Bush and continued in earnest under Obama, would trigger this very sort of sectarian violence driven by Al Qaeda-style fanaticism, not reprisals. Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist, Seymour Hersh writing for the New Yorker, wrote in his 2007 article, The Redirection: Is the Administrations new policy benefiting our enemies in the war on terrorism? that: To undermine Iran, which is predominantly Shiite, the Bush Administration has decided, in effect, to reconfigure its priorities in the Middle East. In Lebanon, the Administration has cooperated with Saudi Arabias government, which is Sunni, in clandestine operations that are intended to weaken Hezbollah, the Shiite organization that is backed by Iran. The U.S. has also taken part in clandestine operations aimed at Iran and its ally Syria. A by-product of these activities has been the bolstering of Sunni extremist groups that espouse a militant vision of Islam and are hostile to America and sympathetic to Al Qaeda. The Redirection, Seymour Hersh (2007) the Saudi government, with Washingtons approval, would provide funds and logistical aid to weaken the government of President Bashir Assad, of Syria. The Israelis believe that putting such pressure on the Assad government will make it more conciliatory and open to negotiations. The Redirection, Seymour Hersh (2007) Further admissions of a joint US-Israeli-Saudi conspiracy against Syria included: [Saudi Arabias] Bandar and other Saudis have assured the White House that they will keep a very close eye on the religious fundamentalists. Their message to us was Weve created this movement, and we can control it. Its not that we dont want the Salafis to throw bombs; its who they throw them atHezbollah, Moqtada al-Sadr, Iran, and at the Syrians, if they continue to work with Hezbollah and Iran. The Redirection, Seymour Hersh (2007) In regards to sectarian extremism in particular it was forewarned that: Robert Baer, a former longtime C.I.A. agent in Lebanon, has been a severe critic of Hezbollah and has warned of its links to Iranian-sponsored terrorism. But now, he told me, weve got Sunni Arabs preparing for cataclysmic conflict, and we will need somebody to protect the Christians in Lebanon. It used to be the French and the United States who would do it, and now its going to be Nasrallah and the Shiites The Redirection, Seymour Hersh (2007) Hezbollahs leader, Hassan Nasrallah was also featured in Hershs report and had also warned of imminent and spreading sectarian war purposefully stoked by the West: Nasrallah said he believed that President Bushs goal was the drawing of a new map for the region. They want the partition of Iraq. Iraq is not on the edge of a civil warthere is a civil war. There is ethnic and sectarian cleansing. The daily killing and displacement which is taking place in Iraq aims at achieving three Iraqi parts, which will be sectarian and ethnically pure as a prelude to the partition of Iraq. Within one or two years at the most, there will be total Sunni areas, total Shiite areas, and total Kurdish areas. Even in Baghdad, there is a fear that it might be divided into two areas, one Sunni and one Shiite. He went on, I can say that President Bush is lying when he says he does not want Iraq to be partitioned. All the facts occurring now on the ground make you swear he is dragging Iraq to partition. And a day will come when he will say, I cannot do anything, since the Iraqis want the partition of their country and I honor the wishes of the people of Iraq. Nasrallah said he believed that America also wanted to bring about the partition of Lebanon and of Syria. In Syria, he said, the result would be to push the country into chaos and internal battles like in Iraq. In Lebanon, There will be a Sunni state, an Alawi state, a Christian state, and a Druze state. But, he said, I do not know if there will be a Shiite state The UN once again is abusing its own self-appointed authority by excusing and spinning premeditated sectarian genocide designed to advance a documented conspiracy admitted to years ago. More recently, this conspiracy to destroy Syria through engineered and purposefully protracted violence was documented further by the very corporate-financiers themselves amongst the pages of reports turned out by their own policy think-tanks. The Brookings Institution in their Middle East Memo #21: Saving Syria: Assessing Options for Regime Change(.pdf), openly stated they sought to bleed Syria in purposefully protracted violence: The United States might still arm the opposition even knowing they will probably never have sufficient power, on their own, to dislodge the Asad network. Washington might choose to do so simply in the belief that at least providing an oppressed people with some ability to resist their oppressors is better than doing nothing at all, even if the support provided has little chance of turning defeat into victory. Alternatively, the United States might calculate that it is still worthwhile to pin down the Asad regime and bleed it, keeping a regional adversary weak, while avoiding the costs of direct intervention. pages 8-9, Assessing Options for Regime Change, Brookings Institution. The sectarian component of the current conflict is not an unexpected result of violence that began only in 2011, it was an integral part of the Wests foreign policy since 2007. The sectarian genocide in Syria was purposefully engineered by Western policy makers, and now is willfully covered up, spun, and excused by the UN and the Western mass media alike. Tony Cartaluccis articles have appeared on many alternative media websites, including his own at Land Destroyer Report, Alternative Thai News Network and LocalOrg. Read other contributed articles by Tony Cartalucci here. 