5 Major Reasons The NSA Cant Be Trusted to Run U.S. Cybersecurity ProgramsEFF In case you need a refresher, heres an overview of why handing cybersecurity to the NSA would be a terrible idea: 1. An executive order generally prohibits NSA from conducting intelligence on Americans domestic activities Executive Order 12333 signed by President Reagan in 1981 (and amended a few times since1), largely prohibits the NSA from spying on domestic activities: no foreign intelligence collection by such elements [of the Intelligence Community] may be undertaken for the purpose of acquiring information concerning the domestic activities of United States persons. If amended, the Cybersecurity Act would allow the NSA to gain information related to cybersecurity threat indicators, which would allow it to collect vast quantities of data that could include personally identifiable information of U.S. persons on American soil. Law enforcement and civilian agencies are tasked with investigating and overseeing domestic safety. The NSA, on the other hand, is an unaccountable military intelligence agency that is supposed to focus on foreign signals intelligenceand its frankly dangerous to expand the NSAs access to information about domestic communications. In the 1960s, a Congressional investigation, led by four-term Senator Frank Church, found that the NSA had engaged in widespread and warrantless spying on Americans citizens. Church was so stunned at what he found, he remarked that the National Security Agencys capability at any time could be turned around on the American people, and no American would have any privacy left, such is the capability to monitor everything. (emphasis added) The investigation led to the passage of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which provided stronger privacy protections for Americans communicationsthat is, until it was weakened by the USA-PATRIOT Act and other reactions to 9/11. 3. NSA has continued its warrantless wiretapping scandal In 2005, the New York Times revealed that the NSA set up a massive warrantless wiretapping program shortly after 9/11, in violation of the Fourth Amendment and several federal laws. This was later confirmed by virtually every major media organization in the country. It led to Congressional investigations and several ongoing lawsuits, including EFFs. Congress passed the FISA Amendments Act to grant telecom companies retroactive immunity for participating in illegal spying and severely weaken privacy safeguards for Americans communicating overseas.Since the FISA Amendments Act (FAA) passed, the NSA has continued collecting emails of Americans. A 2009 New York Times investigation described how a significant and systemic practice of overcollection of communications resulted in the NSAs intercepting millions of purely domestic emails and phone calls between Americans. In addition, documents obtained via a Freedom of Information Act request by the ACLU, although heavily redacted, revealed that violations [of the FAA and the Constitution] continued to occur on a regular basis through at least March 2010 the last month anyone has public data for. 4. NSA recently admitted to violating the Constitution. Just last week, the Office of the Director of National Intelligencewhich oversees the NSAbegrudgingly acknowledged that on at least one occasion the secret FISA court held that some collection used by the government was unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment. Wired called it a federal sidestep of a major section of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, and it confirmed the many reports over the last few years: the NSA has violated the Constitution. 5. NSA keeps much of what it does classified and secret Because cybersecurity policy is inescapably tied to our online civil liberties, its essential to maximize government transparency and accountability here. The NSA may be the worst government entity on this score. Much of the NSAs work is exempt from Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) disclosure because Congress generally shielded NSA activities from FOIA2. Even aside from specific exemption statutes, much information about NSA activities is classified on national security grounds. The NSA has also stonewalled organizations trying to bring public-interest issues to light by claiming the state secrets privilege in court. EFF has been involved in lawsuits challenging the NSAs warrantless surveillance program since 2006. Despite years of litigation, the government continues to maintain that the state secrets privilege prevents any challenge from being heard. Transparency and accountability simply are not the NSAs strong suit. We remain unconvinced that we need any of the proposed cybersecurity bills, but were particularly worried about attempts to deputize the NSA as the head of our cybersecurity systems. And even the NSA has admitted that it does not want to run cyber security for the United States government. Thankfully, new privacy changes in the cybersecurity bill heading towards the Senate floor have explicitly barred intelligence agencies like the NSA from serving as the center of information gathering for cybersecurity. We need to safeguard those protections and fend off amendments that give additional authority to the NSA. Were asking concerned individuals to use our Stop Cyber Spying tool to tweet at their Senators or use the American Library Associations simple tool to call Senators. We need to speak out in force this week to ensure that Americas cybersecurity systems arent handed to the NSA. You can support this information by voting on Reddit HERE Please visit and support Electronic Frontier Foundation for Internet freedom and privacy. linkwithin_text=Related Articles: 