NY Times Drops Bombshell About WMDs In Iraq... Bush Was Right After All Recently, the New York Times finally admitted what conservatives have been standing behind for more than ten yearsthat Saddam Husseins Iraq regime really did hold weapons of mass destruction in direct violation of United Nations resolutions and international law. The Times confirmed that American troops were able to locate an estimated 5,000 chemical munitions in the years between 2004 and 2011, when American forces made the decision to withdraw from Iraq at the request of President Barack Obama. Investigations by the times found that 17 American troops and 7 Iraqis had been exposed to chemical agents during that time. Still the times decided to rewrite history rather than retract their statements that Bush was a liar. After the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, Mr. Bush insisted that Mr. Hussein was hiding an active weapons of mass destruction program, in defiance of international will and at the worlds risk, The Times wrote. United Nations inspectors said they could not find evidence for these claims. Although Bush claimed that Iraq continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal weapons ever devised he did not make any mention of an active program. These encounters carry worrisome implications now that the Islamic State, a Qaeda splinter group, controls much of the territory where the weapons were found, the article claimed. This was directly after the article made the contradictory claim that the munitions found were old and unusable. The new discovery is disturbing for two specific reasons: the first is that weapons of mass destruction in Iraq occurred under President Barack Obama when he made the decision to withdraw. It also means that there are likely still weapons on the ground in Islamic State territory, given that the last weapons were found three or four years ago. What do you think of this new evidence? 