Fake News Ruse: Establishment Declares War on Alternative MediaBy Kurt Nimmo, Blacklisted News On November 16 PolitiFact declared it would fight back against fake news and produced a hit list of alternative media sites. Blacklisted News is included on a list compiled by a site created specifically to target alternative media the establishment wants eliminated. Targeted news sites include selfnews Post, Consortium News, the Corbett Report, Global Research, the websites of Lew Rockwell and Paul Craig Roberts, WikiLeaks, and many others. A few sites on the list are in fact fake news websites and others satirical. The targets are diverse politically, from the alt right website Drudge Report to the more progressive Consortium News and Counterpunch. It should be noted PolitiFact is a creation of the corporate newspaper the Tampa Bay Times and is regularly accused of political bias. The site boasts it won the Pulitzer Prize, a clear indication of its establishment status. Prior to the PolitiFact effort, a website called Is It Propaganda Or Not surfaced. It posted a list of fake news websites and claims the Russians are involved. We assess that this overall Russian effort is at least semi-centralized, with multiple Russian projects and influence operations working in parallel to manage the direct and outsourced production of propaganda across a wide range of outlets There are varying degrees of involvement in it, and awareness of involvement. Some people involved seem genuinely unaware that they are being used by Russia to produce propaganda, but many others seem to know full well. Democrats claimed the Russians were meddling in US politics when it became obvious Donald Trump actually had a chance to win the White House. There is virtually no evidence the Russians had anything to do with the outcome of the election, the hacking of the DNC, and even less evidence it is nefariously exploiting American and European alternative news websites to push propaganda. This is part of a concerted effort to eventually deny fake news websites access to the web or at best relegate them to a far corner not reached by corporate search engines and more importantly eschewed by advertisers. The corporate media no longer controls the news cycle. The propaganda it receives and reports from the government is now critically analyzed and debunked on social media within minutes. Millions of Americans no longer watch the corporate alphabet news networks or read corporate newspapers. In May, Pew Research reported 62% of US adults get their news from social media. Reddit, Twitter, Facebook, and Tumblr are more influential than the New York Times, The Washington Post, and other corporate establishment newspapers and websites. It remains to be seen if Google, Twitter, and Facebook will take more draconian measures to shut down alternative media posts and links to websites targeted by the establishment. A transfer of the Internets Domain Naming System now underway also may threaten sites the government says are fake or foreign propaganda. How do we fight back against this? First and foremost, Facebook and Twitter must be reminded they have a responsibility to the First Amendment and the free exchange of ideas. Facebook et al. are, of course, privately owned corporations and as such can deny service to anybody they want. The vast majority of the names of the fake news hit list, however, are legitimate news websites. Blocking access to them is not only a terrible public relations move, but also reveals they are tools for government coercion and censorship. Finally, corporations are sensitive to public opinion and how that reflects on their bottom line. A large number of people emailing Google, Facebook, Twitter, and other social media platforms and expressing their opposition to the targeting of alternative news may have an impact on what ultimately happens. Kurt Nimmo is the editor of Another Day in the Empire. He is the former lead editor and writer of Infowars.com. Donate to ADE Here. MSM is dead, they shot themselves in the foot during this election. The Democratic Party now keeps complaining about the so called fake news on Facebook etc but never actually sites an example of a single news item that they say is fake. Are the news articles about the many lies of Hillary or the news that the FBI stated that she deleted over 30,000 emails after beging told she was to turn her emails over to congress a fake news item, or that over 500 paid thugs were sent to disrupt a Trump speech? They blame Russia for the news items for they claim the Russians hacked their emails. Who cares who hacked their emails if what was disclosed is true. They were caught and those emails are not fake news. I would like to hear exactly which news items were fake. How about admitting which news was true? Are we all too dumb now to decide for ourselves whats fake and whats more factual. What happened to the independent press that gave us there own version on events. These days all western press releases come from the same source and just repeated by the various news makers. I have to admit I get more information off the web sites than radio television or Press. Slowly but surely our government is destroying their real enemy, the Constitution. This is an open attack on free speech no matter how you spin it. 