NATO Intervention in Syria ImminentStephen Lendman, Contributor The US and NATO are set to invade Syria, something many of us have been warning about for a while now. It has been obvious that they have been looking for a pretext and that pretext has already been injected into the public debate. VoR cited fabricated claims about threatening chemical weapons. Media scoundrels hype them. Sarin nerve gas was mentioned. Reports claimed Assad readied it in bombs. No evidence whatever was cited. Theyre ready to go but havent been loaded on planes, said an unnamed US official. Pentagon spokesman George Little said any consideration of the use of chemical weapons by the Syrian regime would be unacceptable. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said: I think there is no question that we remain very concerned, very concerned that as the opposition advances, in particular on Damascus, that the regime might very well consider the use of chemical weapons. The intelligence that we have causes serious concerns that this is being considered. The president of the United States has made very clear there will be consequences, there will be consequences if the Assad regime makes a terrible mistake by using these chemical weapons on their own people. Syria stresses again, for the 10th, the 100th time, that if we had such weapons, they would not be used against our people. We would not commit suicide. The alleged Syrian chemical weapons threat replicates bogus allegations about Saddams nonexistent WMDs. Its similar to falsified claims about Gaddafi, the Taliban, and numerous other invented US enemies. Big Lies launch wars. InThe Art of War,Sun Tzu said All war is based on deception. Its true now like in ancient times. Instant global communications, super-weapons, and scoundrel media complicity make todays threat especially ominous. Washingtons rage for war threatens humanity. Peace doesnt have a chance. Media scoundrels hype false threats. Repeated ad nauseam, people believe them. No matter how many previous times they were fooled, they buy the Big Lie again. It happens every time. Theyre being set up again now. Administration, congressional, and Pentagon officials are preparing the public for more war. Falsified headlines hype nonexistent threats. Humanity hangs in the balance. Where this ends, who knows. In early December, UN officials said theyre recalling all non-essential Syrian staff. Growing conflict dangers were cited. Perhaps advance word of imminent NATO intervention was gotten. On December 6, CNN cited a Pentagon spokesman Little saying Washington updated its military options for potentially striking Syria. We are prepared for a full range of contingencies, said Little. He added that US forces have all the firepower needed in the region for full-scale war if ordered. A previous article said Washington positioned considerable military strength off Syrias coast. It includes 10,000 combat troops, 70 fighter-bombers, 17 or more warships (including the USS Eisenhower and Iwo Jima Amphibious Ready Group), heavy armaments, offensive Patriot missiles, Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense System readiness, and Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) capability. It suggests US-led NATO intervention could happen any time. More than ever it looks imminent. On December 7, Syria Deeply headlined EXCLUSIVE: US Trains Rebel Brigades to Secure Chemical Weapons, saying that Washington and NATO allies hired contractors to train opposition Syrian mercenaries. Four unnamed diplomats, including a US official, said exercises are ongoing in Turkey and Jordan. At issue is whether Washington plans a false flag chemical attack as pretext for full-scale US-led NATO intervention. Syria Deeply stopped short of suggesting it. Obama and Clinton said using them crosses a red line. Washington would respond. On December 7, Hillary Clinton urged all parties involved to make a concerted push to resolve the Syrian conflict. Perhaps imminent intervention was hinted. Frances Le Figero said French military advisers met with opposition fighters inside Syria. So have US and UK elements. At issue is assessing operational capabilities of different groups and choosing which ones get weapons. On December 4, NATO foreign ministers met in Brussels. They expressed solidarity with Turkey. They agreed to deter any potential threat Ankara faces. Theres none, but they suggested otherwise. On December 6, Germanys Suddeutsche Zeitung (SZ) headlined: Nato-Fhrung erwgt militrische Intervention in Syrien (NATO leadership is considering military intervention in Syria). Multiple sources told SZ that NATO Secretary-General Fogh Rasmussen said the alliance cant stick its head in the sand. NATO is prepared to intervene in Syria if ordered. Earlier Rasmussen said NATO had no intention of doing so. He lied. Perhaps its been planned all along. SZ said Rasmussen is supported by Washington, Britain and Turkey. The Pentagon will suggest ways to implement a no-fly zone. Rasmussen asked what would NATO do if Syria uses chemical weapons? What if Iran blocks the Strait of Hormuz? Germany, the Netherlands, the Czech Republic and Poland discount a chemical weapons threat. Russia told NATO members to take inflammatory threats with a grain of salt. Previous ones proved false. This time isnt different. SZ said NATO foreign ministers failed to reach common ground. Its unlikely to matter. Washington, Britain, Turkey, Rasmussen, and apparently France favor intervention. No combination of other countries can stop them. On December 7, Mossad-connected DEBKAfile headlined Paris: NATO-Arab Syria intervention imminent, saying: Sources close to the French Defense Ministry (said intervention) is due to begin shortly with the participation of the US, France, Britain, Turkey, Jordan and other anti-Assad Arab nations. France deployed the aircraft carrier Charles De Gaulle in the Mediterranean. Combat marines are on board. Britain has at least five warships nearby. Theyve joined Washingtons battle group. In November, British and French forces performed landing-and-capture exercises against fortified locations on the coast and mountains of Albania as practice for potential operations against similar terrain in Syria, where the Alawite Mountains loom over the coastal towns of Latakia and Tartus. French sources told Le Point magazine that the NATO mission for Syria, including the UK and the US, would be modeled on the Western intervention in Libya in 2011. It would combine an aerial blitz with ground action by special forces for destroying Assads chemical weapons stocks, his air force and his air defense systems. A previous article called today perhaps the most perilous time in world history. Daily events should scare everyone. Possible regional or global war looms. Disastrous consequences could follow. Obama may head humanity into the abyss. Perhaps theres no way to stop him. Its vital for anti-war activists to challenge whats too potentially catastrophic to tolerate. The risks are far too great to stay sidelined. Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.His new book is titled How Wall Street Fleeces America: Privatized Banking, Government Collusion and Class War.Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour/ 