A Council on Foreign Relations Love Letter to Al Qaedaselfnews Post Ed Husain, Senior Fellow for Middle Eastern Studies at the Council on Foreign Relations think-tank, drips with admiration for the once-labeled extremist killers of all things democratic, holy and good. Husain writes for CFR.org: This morally bankrupt statement, where the enemy of my enemy is my friend even while butchering innocent people, is appalling in the face of documented atrocities and terrorism being committed on the ground by rebel forces. Worse yet, this love letter of support is backed up by the unwitting (but largely unwilling) U.S. taxpayer. Embedded here of course is the admission that al-Qaeda is there at all something that mainstreammedia originally denied, and the Department of Defense has even just recently posted on their site that: Now that the West is openly supporting Al Qaeda in Syria (much like they did to topple Libya), the media can no longer keep a lid on it. At the same time, Western governments continue to crack down on liberties for their own populations in the name of fighting terror which used to mean al-Qaeda, but has magically shifted to any American who upholds the nations founding principles (now known as potential domestic terrorism),or even Americans going about theinnocuous activitiesof their day. This deceit has been known by many for some time, but now even hardened ideologues can no longer pretend this isnt the case. From the CIA founding Al Qaeda to stop the Soviets in Afghanistan, to using them more recently to topple secular Arab governments; more people will discover that 9/11 wasnt a hiatus in loyalty, but rather just another mission for this proxy force of the decision makers. Husain and the CFR are factually correct that the rebels would be nothing without international jihadists joining the fight. In fact, a British photographer, John Cantile, recently released from rebel kidnappers, said out of the 30 rebels there was Not a Syrian in sight. He addedTwo of them were so Anglicised they couldnt speak Arabic. The world is being told that the conflict in Syria is a civil war or, as the media labels it, the war within. Yet if the overwhelming majority of rebels are international jihadist mercenaries, is it even appropriate to label it as such? According to McClatchy News (viaMiami Herald),Jeroen Oerlemans, a Dutch freelance photographer who was captured with Cantile, described the rebels asforeign jihadists. Despite gruesome reports of mass murder by some of these jihadists, the U.S. is currently giving $100 million taxpayer dollars from its bankrupt coffers over to their efforts $74 million now known as humanitarian aid and $25 million in non-lethal communications assistance. (source) This policy of supporting terrorists is also firmly in place with U.S. co-conspirator, the United Kingdom, where Tony Cartalucci has reported: The recent CFR love letter to al-Qaeda just serves to illustrate the greater fog of war: perception management by those who would like to convince their own populations who fund their wars that up is down and black is white. It is a strategy that shows signs of failing, as the confusion and desperation grows among the ranks of the elite in their quest to control an increasingly awake global population whose memories dont seem to be as faulty as global controllers would like. Even the top level CFR supposed grandmaster of the geopolitical chessboard, Zbigniew Brzezinski, has had to admit this obvious weakness of elites and warmongers: Read other articles by selfnews Post HERE You can support this information by voting on Reddit HERE 