US Officially Arming Extremists in SyriaDenied no longer, US officials admit US-Saudi cash logistical support arming terrorists in Syria. Recently reported in Brookings Announces Next Move in Syria: War, it was stated that by the US policy think-tank Brookings Institutions own admission, the Kofi Annan six-point peace plan in Syria was merely a ploy to buy time to reorganize NATOs ineffective terrorist proxies and provide them the pretext necessary for establishing NATO protected safe havens from which to carry out their terrorism from. It was also examined in detail, how in 2007, US, Saudi, and Israeli officials admitted they were creating a militant front of extremists for the sole purpose of causing the destabilization of Syria we see today, and ultimately overthrowing the Syrian government. It was noted how these extremist militants had direct ties to Al Qaeda. Now it is fully admitted that weapons, cash, and logistical support is indeed being provided to terrorist forces in Syria by the United States, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and other Gulf States. This, despite a current UN ceasefire the West has continuously berated the Syrian government for violating, indicates that indeed reorganizing, rearming, and redeploying NATOs terrorist proxies is complete, and another round of destructive violence has begun. In the Washington Posts article, Syrian rebels get influx of arms with gulf neighbors money, U.S. coordination, not only is this admitted, but claims made by Syrian President Bashar al-Assad have been confirmed that Syrias historically violent Muslim Brotherhood, stated in 2007 by Seymour Hersh as being a direct proxy of US-Saudi-Israeli funding and support, is also directly arming and funding contingents of extremists committing acts of terror across Syria. The Washington Post openly admits that these weapons, supplies, cash and support, provided by the US and Saudi Arabia are directly responsible for the increased violence in Syria, in the midst of a ceasefire the West has attempted to disingenuously use to defame the Syrian government, hamper its ability to restore order, and indeed, rearm, reorganize, and redeploy their terrorist proxies to begin another attempt at violent foreign-backed regime change: The effect of the new arms appeared evident in Mondays clash between opposition and government forces over control of the rebel-held city of Rastan, near Homs. The Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said rebel forces who overran a government base had killed 23 Syrian soldiers.-Washington Post, May 16, 2012 The Post also admitted that Washington, again, in the midst of a UN ceasefire, was attempting to trigger yet more violence, this time in areas controlled by Syrias Kurds who have remained out of the predominately foreign-backed conflict. Paradoxically, the US and Gulf State military support being funneled into Syria to purposefully flare violence in the midst of a UN ceasefire, is continuing even after the Pentagon has admitted Al Qaeda is present and active in Syria, this after terrorist groups claimed responsibility for a series of bombings that have killed mostly civilians. And in the midst of this admitted attempt to increase violence and chaos, the Washington Post also declared that NATO-member Turkey would be pressured to invoke Article IV of the NATO Charter, allowing NATO to militarily intervene to stop violence they openly admit they are creating. Unlike previous conflicts the US admission is not aham-handedobfuscation of the their intentions, but an open declaration of intent to provoke a war of aggression a Nuremberg offense for all involved. In fact, direct parallels between Adolf Hitlers September 1938 campaign of destabilization in Czechoslovakia, and NATOs current destabilization of Syria have been made by noted geopolitical analysts. Images: The Henry Jackson Society and the Brookings Institution are just two of many similar think-tanks with identical members and identical corporate sponsors. These are the authors of NATOs increasingly long list of war crimes, including those authorized by US President George W. Bush, now officially a convicted war criminal. While Bushs conviction currently lacks a realistic means of arresting and sentencing him, if we know the corporations and institutions that craft the policies used by Bush to commit his crimes, we the people, ourselves, can start by imposing sanctions on these special interests with boycotts. (click images to enlarge) A historical conviction handed down by the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission, finding former-US President George W. Bush guilty of war crimes, sets a precedent to be used against those committing war crimes today, and of course a model to be expanded upon, including methods and official calls to impose sanctions on organizations and institutions supporting leaders committing war crimes, including both the policy think tanks engineering the war crimes and boycotting and banning the corporations and institutions funding these think-tanks. This does not require an act by the UN, or your national government. You can begin boycotting these corporations today and thus begin undermining the authority and impunity from which they operate. Tony Cartaluccis articles have appeared on many alternative media websites, including his own at Land Destroyer Report. Read other contributed articles by Tony Cartalucci here. linkwithin_text=Related Articles: 