They Told The Air Force Coach Not To Quote The Bible, So He Did THIS Instead According to reports from BPR, the Air Force Academy has determined that a football assistant coach tweeting out Bible verses from his personal account is not in violation of any law or ruledespite attacks from an anti-religious military group. The Military Religious Freedom Foundation (MRFF), run by Mikey Weinstein, was very vocal in their objections to the Bible verses shared by Steed Lobotzke on Twitter. Lobotzkes Twitter bios states that hes a Follower of Christ but also explicitly states that his tweets represent his own views and not those of the Air Force Academy. Heres an example of one of the Tweets that outraged the MRFF: Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born again he cannot see the kingdom of God. (John 3:3 ESV). I saw the Spirit descend from heavenand it remained on himAnd I have seen and have borne witness that this is the Son of God. John 1:32, another Tweet reads. The Bible verses led Weinstein and his organization to accuse Lobotzke of Christian evangelizing via twitter, blatantly defying Air Force regulations. Today, the Air Force Academy senior leadership clearly shows that unchecked Christian extremism is worse than ever at the Academy, especially on its football team, with the shocking discovery of what the football teams Tight Ends Coach, Steed Lobotzke, a 1992 USAFA grad, has been doing with his official USAFA football twitter account, MRFF told The Gazette in a statement. Lobotzkes official twitter feed is filled with illicit proselytizing in the name of Jesus Christ and even includes such biblical citations juxtaposed with pictures of official football team meetings. The Air Force does not agree with Weinsteins sentiment, noting instead that Twitter accounts of coaches are entirely personal and have no connection the Athletic Department at the Air Force Academy. The Academy remains committed to protecting individuals right to practice any religion they choose, or no religion, provided their practices do not violate policy or law, or impede mission accomplishment, military readiness, unit cohesion, standards or discipline. What do you think? Is it completely outrageous to attack Lobotzke for expressing his own religious views on a personal account? 