Obama to reportedly release legal memos on drone assassination program to intelligence committeesMadison Ruppert, Contributor The move is reportedly in response to the demands from Congress, including democrats, although those demands have been made for quite a while now. According to the New York Times, the legal memos will be released to both intelligence committees. According to Ryan Reilly of the Huffington Post, While select members of Congress will have access to the document, there are no plans to make it public. Interestingly, an anonymous Obama administration official told CNN, Today, as part of the Presidents ongoing commitment to consult with Congress on national security matters, the president directed the department of justice to provide the congressional intelligence committees access to classified office of legal counsel advice related to the subject of the department of justice white paper. In reality, Obama apparently does not care all that much about consulting with Congress on national security matters given the secret interpretation of critical laws and the secrecy surrounding spy court rulings. This is perhaps the most absurd claim in the entirety of the report. The reality is that the Obama administration rejects scrutiny and debate when the program is actually challenged in court. When the Obama administration was sued over the classified Office of Legal Counsel memo outlining the supposed legal justification for the targeted killing program, they refused to either confirm or deny that the memo even existed. Most recently, a federal judge ruled that the Obama administration never has to explain the legal justification for the program, all while claiming that indeed there is a solid legal basis for killing U.S. citizens without charge or trial. Reilly notes that while the release will not be public, the administrations acknowledgement that the OLC memo does in fact exist could help the cause of reporters and civil liberties advocates who are suing to obtain the full memorandum under the Freedom of Information Act. Clearly when it comes to actually justifying the program in court, scrutiny and debate is the last thing the Obama administration is interested in, although theyre happy to claim the strikes are legal, ethical and wise. Did I forget anything or miss any errors? Would you like to make me aware of a story or subject to cover? Or perhaps you want to bring your writing to a wider audience? Feel free to contact me at admin@EndtheLie.com with your concerns, tips, questions, original writings, insults or just about anything that may strike your fancy. Please support our work and help us start to pay contributors by doing your shopping through our Amazon link or check out some must-have products at our store. This article first appeared at End the Lie. Madison Ruppert is the Editor and Owner-Operator of the alternative news and analysis databaseEnd The Lie and has no affiliation with any NGO, political party, economic school, or other organization/cause. He is available for podcast and radio interviews. Madison also now has his own radio show on UCYTV Monday nights 7 PM 9 PM PT/10 PM 12 AM ET. Show page link here: http://UCY.TV/EndtheLie. If you have questions, comments, or corrections feel free to contact him at admin@EndtheLie.com linkwithin_text=Related Articles: 