Here We Go: Iran Accuses US of Deal DishonestyChris Carrington Marziyeh Afkham, Iranian foreign minister said: What has been released by the website of the White House as a factsheet is a one-sided interpretation of the agreed text in Geneva and some of the explanations and words in the sheet contradict the text of the Joint Plan of Action [the title of the Iran-powers deal], and this factsheet has unfortunately been translated and released in the name of the Geneva agreement by certain media, which is not true. The Iranian minister said that the reason the talks went on so long was because the wording of the agreement had to be precise and agreeable to both sides. During the meeting this precise wording was agreed upon, but when the details were released on Sunday morning, the wording differed markedly from the original text. Tehrans version, which it says is accurate as per the agreement is: This comprehensive solution would enable Iran to fully enjoy its right to nuclear energy for peaceful purposes under the relevant articles of the NPT in conformity with its obligations therein. And finally, the draft stipulates that this comprehensive solution would constitute an integrated whole where nothing is agreed until everything is agreed. Read more Chris Carrington is a writer, researcher and lecturer with a background in science, technology and environmental studies. Chris is an editor for The Daily Sheeple, where this first appeared.Wake the flock up! 