The Libyan Election FarceAll candidates are neo-imperial candidates Wall Street proxy Jibril of National Forces Alliance presumed winner. Ideally the West would like to install liberal pro-globalist candidates into power in each of the nations it has destabilized and destroyed during its premeditated, engineered Arab Spring. In the case of Egypt where Mohammed ElBaradei was sufficiently exposed and his presidential aspirations effectively derailed, the Wests Muslim Brotherhood proxies made for a viable second option. In Libya, a similar scenario has unfolded with two tiers of Western proxies poised to take power pro-globalist technocrats like US-educated Mahmoud Jibril (Gibril) ElwarfallysNational Forces Alliance, and of course NATOs terrorist proxies within the Muslim Brotherhood along with Al Qaeda-linked Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) warlords likeAbdul Hakim Belhaj. In Egypt where relative economic and social stability returned after the brief chaos and violence of the early 2011 protests, the alternative media was able to sufficiently expose and disrupt liberal candidate ElBaradei. In Libya, the nation has been plunged into nationwide lawlessness, violence, and sweeping genocide by sectarian extremists, tribal confrontations, and militant opportunists. The people of Libya have been too busy defending themselves and desperately fighting for their own immediate survival to function as a nation-state, let alone scrutinize candidates politically before the farcical Western-hyped elections. In other words, no matter who wins the so-called elections in war-torn Libya, the West has ensured all the candidates are loyal proxies, and will most assuredly have one of these proxies in place to guide Libya according to its own agenda rather than that of the Libyan people. The New York Times has already proclaimed in its article, Party Led by Pro-Western Official Claims Lead in Libya, that Jibrils party is the likely winner. Readers might recall that in May of 2011, Jibril had made a pilgrimage back to the United States where he received his higher education and spent years teaching in Pittsburgh, to speak before the corporate-financier funded Brookings Institution (Brookings page here) about turning Libya into a lake to develop the skills of Africans to serve the needs of markets in the European Union. And despite these elections, Libya will remain largely lawless and a terrorist safe-haven by design so that it may continue serving its purpose as a weapons, fighter, and cash hub for NATO militant proxies throughout the region, particularly verses Syria. Libyas transitional government led by Western big oil representative Abdurrahim el-Keib had already played a significant role in carrying out Western designs against other geopolitical targets throughout North Africa and the Middle East, including Mali and Syria where Libya has shipped both weapons and fighters to augment NATO-backed terrorists seeking to overthrow these targeted governments. Libya under el-Keib has also lent significant political support to the Wests Arab World agenda. Along with the government of Tunisia led at the time by US funded activist Moncef Marzouki, Libya had withdrawn recognition of Syrias government. The US-installed Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt has likewise backed Western designs throughout the region, most recently backing US calls for intervention in Syria. What the uninformed public believes it is seeing is a transition to democracy across the Arab World and each of these nations joining together to ensure such a transition in remaining dictatorships takes place. It might be mistakenly believed then that the United States is merely reacting to this unfolding paradigm in a supportive capacity. What has happened in reality is that the so-called Arab Spring was planned by the West as early as 2008 with activists literally flown to the United States to receive training, funding, and equipment with which to return to their home countries and begin a campaign of coordinated destabilization. It was under this cover of seemingly legitimate peaceful protesting that more violent elements, organized as early as 2007 or even earlier (as was the case in Libya), began violently overthrowing regimes targeted, according to US Army General Wesley Clark, as early as 1991, with a complete list documented as early as 2001. This list, provided during General Clarks talk at the Commonwealth Club of California, October 3, 2007, included seven nations slated by the Pentagon for destabilization and destruction: Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya Somalia, Sudan, and Iran. Libyas elections are therefore an absolute farce in the wake of a premeditated Western military campaign aimed at the entire Arab World the elections a motion gone through to couch the creation of a Western client regime within the perceived legitimacy elections may grant it in the minds of both Libyans and global public opinion. Tony Cartaluccis articles have appeared on many alternative media websites, including his own at Land Destroyer Report. Read other contributed articles by Tony Cartalucci here. You can support this information by voting on Reddit HERE. linkwithin_text=Related Articles: 