Does Obama Plan To Announce Bombing Of Syria On Eve Of 9/11 Anniversary?Brandon Turbeville After years of propaganda alleging Assads brutality against his own people and a recent volley of ISIS is under the bed-style hype, complete with beheadings, forced starvations, and other savagery, the American people remain utterly befuddled regarding the true nature of events taking place inside Syria, Iraq, and virtually every other country in the world, including their own. As a result, the buildup to a Western bombing campaign against Syria, while rejected by the general public only a year ago, will now likely move full steam ahead with the tacit support of the population. Thus, as the thirteenth anniversary of 9/11 approaches, U.S. President Barack Obama is planning to make a dramatic statement regarding his strategy to combat ISIS in both Iraq and Syria. Although Obama has repeatedly stated that he will not commit U.S. troops to either Iraq or Syria, the possibility of targeted airstrikes or aerial bombardment is by no means off the table. Of course, it is also important to point out that Obama has already broken his promise regarding boots on the ground in Iraq with the deployment of at least 1,100 American personnel in the Middle Eastern nation. Still, as the Detroit Free Press reports, The plan is expected to involve an expansion of air strikes in Iraq that began in August. Obama is also likely to discuss a coalition of allies that has been assembled in opposition to the Islamic State, and to brace Americans for the possibility that the battle could take years. In other words, Obama is once again channeling his inner George W. Bush in promoting war with no end against a sovereign state who is the victim of Anglo-American meddling and Western-backed terrorism. The DFP also states that In his speech, the president may also discuss the long-term potential for air strikes in Syria, though military action in that country is not considered imminent. In a recent interview with NBCs Meet The Press, Obama stated that he expected Syrians to battle ISIS on their own land. Obama said In terms of controlling territory, were going to have to develop a moderate Sunni opposition that can control territory and that we can work with. The notion that the United States should be putting boots on the ground, I think would be a profound mistake. And I want to be very clear and very explicit about that. Obamas statement is quite interesting considering the fact that his administration claims to have been doing just that developing a moderate Sunni opposition that can control territory and that we can work with since 2011. So either his upcoming speech will simply be more repetition of tired talking points that serve to cover up the fact that the West is backing ISIS or it will be admission that there is no moderate opposition inside Syria which would reveal that the U.S. has been backing ISIS all along. All of this, of course, will simply go over the heads of Americans more focused on supporting the troops and football stats than the slaughter of thousands of people overseas or a potential nuclear war with Russia over Ukraine. There Are No Moderates In Syria In reality, the so-called opposition in Syria is anything but moderate. As Tony Cartalucci wrote in his article, In Syria, There Are No Moderates, Indeed, even the New York Times has been forced to admit that there are, as Cartalucci expertly argues in his article, no moderates in the ranks of the Syrian death squads. As Ben Hubbard wrote in April, 2013, Make no mistake, however, any military action taken across the border inside Syria will not be taken for the purposes of eliminating ISIS. The truth is that such military action will be nothing more than a backdoor attempt at establishing the buffer zone that NATO so ardently desired early on in the Syrian conflict. With the establishment of this buffer zone, a new staging ground will be opened that allows terrorists such as ISIS and others the ability to conduct attacks even deeper inside Syria. After all, the Pentagon even stated that one of the biggest threats to an airstrike operation in Syria is the Syrian governments air defenses. Thanks to ISIS, those air defenses no longer exist in the east of Syria. This was the end game of the ISIS battle to take over Taqba from the start eliminate air defenses so that the NATO powers can launch airstrikes against the Syrian military and thus freeing up a launching pad for the terrorists to conduct attacks even deeper into Syria. With the James Foley beheading video being largely understood as a staged propaganda ploy as well the fact that ISIS and its related terrorist organizations are funded, directed, and trained by the United States and NATO, it is imperative that the American people speak out and oppose the impending strike on Syria. So far, on this particular issue, American apathy has largely contributed to preventing a war. Unfortunately, with slightly more clever propaganda narratives, that apathy has been converted over to the benefit of the world oligarchy. Thus, while apathy may have prevented the desire for a fight the first time around, that same apathy may well serve to allow one the second. Recently from Brandon Turbeville: Brandon Turbeville is an author out of Florence, South Carolina. He has a Bachelors Degree from Francis Marion University and is the author of six books, Codex Alimentarius The End of Health Freedom, 7 Real Conspiracies,Five Sense Solutionsand Dispatches From a Dissident, volume 1 and volume 2, and The Road to Damascus: The Anglo-American Assault on Syria.Turbeville has published over 300 articles dealing on a wide variety of subjects including health, economics, government corruption, and civil liberties. Brandon Turbevilles podcast Truth on The Tracks can be found every Monday night 9 pm EST at UCYTV. He is available for radio and TV interviews. Please contact activistpost (at) gmail.com. 