Paris Attacks Damage Control: New Would-be Shooter Suddenly Captured Minority Report StyleBy Bernie Suarez Perhaps the controllers felt the retraction by Hughes was not enough so they pulled what I called an I shot Bin Laden stunt on the masses. An I shot Bin Laden moment is when a story is engineered and put out by the mass media for the primary reason of bringing the story back to life after a long period of being on the shelf. We see this all the time; for example, whenever they put out a story about how they found a plane part of MH-370, or the San Bernardino cell phone cracking, or even the new Boston bombing movies that will be released later this year. The I shot Bin Laden reference itself, of course, stems from the 2014 story about the Navy SEAL Robert ONeill who suddenly claimed he alone shot Bin Laden to death. This story mostly served to resurrect the Bin Laden capture hoax in the minds of the masses. So lets face it, the gap between Hollywood fantasy and mainstream media is now mostly gone. The two ideas have merged. Every piece of news-related evidence is now a fully controlled scene with carefully edited video clips and soundbites. Because he is charged with the broad paintbrush of terrorism, like the individuals at Guantanamo Bay prison, well never know what exactly the accused man, Salah Abdeslam, is guilty of, if anything, who manipulated the evidence, and who acted as final judge. And for anyone who is caught in the middle of the game and finds themselves to be a pawn in a much larger game, to these people there is little hope of escape from political prosecution as many of the Guantanamo prisoners have learned all these years. Unfortunately for the newly accused Salah Abdeslam, the supposed top suspect in 2015s Paris shooting, historically speaking, political patsies have not fared well. Like the Dzhokhar Tsarnaevs of the world, Abdeslam will have no voice, no leverage and no influence on the final outcome of what will happen to him because whether he realizes it or not he is nothing more than a patsy in a much bigger story being told. What story is that? First of all, as implied I believe the first goal of the story is to simply bring the Paris attacks back into the news and thus back into our consciousness. As I already mentioned, I believe this is damage control for the embarrassment the establishment suffered last week. Secondly, I believe Paris was a dress rehearsal for a much bigger future false flag. Thirdly, with the 2 new Boston bombing films to be released later this year (2016), the idea of martial law will be sold in the form of lockdown and they will portray it as something you should be respectful of, kind of like standing and holding your hand over your heart during the playing of the national anthem. They will sell the idea to the masses that there is a connection between respecting lockdown and patriotism, honoring lockdown and showing your love for your country. Submitting to lockdown will be portrayed as a way of rooting for the good guys while the militarized scary looking police chase often actually KILLS the supposed bad guys without any trial or proof of guilt. These are just a few agendas in play right now. But to add more to the suspicious irony of this story, a close look at the evidence against Abdeslam raises Minority Report-like concerns. Abdeslam is clearly being charged for speculations about what he was GOING to do not for anything he actually did. Emphasis in bold. Salah Abdeslam, the top suspect in last years Paris attacks, was charged with terrorist murder on Saturday by Belgian authorities for the carnage that left 130 people dead. A French prosecutor said Abdeslam had planned to be a stadium suicide bomber but backed out at the last minute. Yes, you read it correctly for yourself. Unlike the other supposed shooters, this guy actually chose NOT to partake in shooting anyone. But, according to the terrorist murder charges he was THINKING of doing it and that makes him a top suspect murderer. This is a classic thought crime playing out right before our eyes and no one is even saying a word. Oops, I take that back. Someone is saying a word. The prosecutor and the Belgium authorities: Molins said the suspect abandoned his suicide vest that night after he drove other attackers to Paris but he did not say why. Belgium authorities on Saturday officially charged him and an alleged accomplice who has used two aliases with participation in terrorist murder and in the activities of a terrorist organization. So what can we learn from this? Participation is a generic term that can be used to link almost anyone to terrorism. But what exactly constitutes participation? Did he drive the would-be shooters to Paris specifically as a mass shooter cab driver service? Was he just a generically hired driver? Did he know what specifically his passengers were going to do? How do we know for sure? If so, does that set a precedent that if someone comes in contact in any way shape or form with an eventual would-be terrorist, does that make that person a terrorist murderer as the state implies? Doesnt it seem like its getting easier and easier to frame someone with generic charges for things they were GOING to do and for playing any minor role in an eventual event? Thats the implication behind generic charges such as participation and being in the activities of terrorist organization. To many Americans reading all of this thousands of miles away you might think, oh well, hes guilty, it doesnt matter to me. But what about if you were hired to deliver a package for someone that day and the delivery turned out to be a key item they needed in the attacks, does that make you a terrorist murderer too for aiding terrorism? What if you repaired the car that was used in the attacks, are you part of it too? Even if he actually was part of the conspiracy, like the person who provides the getaway car in a bank robbery, the charges should be less severe since you only aided, right? The fact is that since this whole case falls under the magic label of terrorism all justice, morality, logic and reason goes out the window. We all know that terrorism is a label that automatically forfeits all rights and marks you guilty as charged without a need for a trial, and thats the main issue here. They are creating a case against Abdeslam regardless of what his role if any was, because they can. Its literally a freebie for the controllers. This is one of the points to watch closely here. There is nothing in this recent story pointing to definitive evidence that Abdeslam is this super-dangerous top ISIS terrorist guy. But that doesnt stop the controllers from painting this picture with dramatic verbal flair claiming simultaneously that his capture is both a huge blow to ISIS and that everyone should be afraid of almighty ISIS. Bernard Cazeneuve, the French interior minister, said he hopes Abdeslam can be brought to France to face justice. He called Abdeslams arrest a major blow to the Islamic State group in Europe, but warned the threat of new attacks remains extremely high. How convenient, huh? Did you expect anything different? All of these stories fit in perfectly with the ruling elites long-term plans for the planet, for America and for each of us as individuals. This story serves their purpose in so many ways that everyone should be familiar with how this works and how this usually ends. That the suspect wasnt involved in killing anyone and all the evidence against him is just a prosecutor mentioning his association with the other now-dead patsies, only serves to reinforce the Minority Report thought crimes new court of government opinion. Have we considered that this entire suspect capturing event could be one big judicial system experiment (think Jade Helm) to see how quickly they can charge, try and maybe even execute a patsy with no real evidence against him? Have we considered the ease by which someone can be accuse of associating with terrorists, or how much easier it is to accuse someone of ALMOST committing an act of terror, or for THINKING of committing an act of terrorism? Lets review: Someone else commits a crime, the system retroactively links you to them, and you are then guilty of associating with terrorists; therefore, you are a terrorist and you are, therefore, guilty by default. Im reminded of the Oklahoma City bombing and the Boston bombing event where the patsies were quickly processed, convicted and sentenced before the public could wrap their heads around what really happened. If nothing else, lets remember that the controllers have events for scenarios where the shooter conveniently kills themselves (most common) as well as these aftermath patsies-in-court events where they capture ancillary suspects they want, and they try them in the courtroom of mainstream media engineered public opinion. As we saw in the cases of Tsarnaev and Tim McVeigh, by the time the actual trial comes around the patsy is already beyond guilty in the public consciousness and thus the trial is just a formality side show with a predetermined conclusion. Its concerning to think this is the new courtroom. We saw this recently during the Oregon standoff as well, in the immediate aftermath we observed as mainstream media judged and sentenced all of those involved in the courtroom of mass media engineered public opinion. Either way, if this new captured suspect is guilty of a specific crime, that should be established concretely. In order to do that well have to drop the terrorism linguistic programming psyop and go back to innocent until proven guilty. In other words we need to re-establish the rule of law. Given that the War on Terror is a hoax perpetuated by the presence of ISIS, which is a creation of the U.S. and its allies, we have no compelling reason to believe anything the Western media and its allies are claiming about this case and this suspect. And the fact that they cannot pin a specific act of violence or crime against him only shows you how artificial this entire thing is. Bernie is a revolutionary writer with a background in medicine, psychology, and information technology. He is the author of The Art of Overcoming the New World Order and has written numerous articles over the years about freedom, government corruption and conspiracies, and solutions. A former host of the 9/11 Freefall radio show, Bernie is also the creator of the Truth and Art TV project where he shares articles and videos about issues that raise our consciousness and offer solutions to our current problems. His efforts are designed to encourage others to joyfully stand for truth, to expose government tactics of propaganda, fear and deception, and to address the psychology of dealing with the rising new world order. He is also a former U.S. Marine who believes it is our duty to stand for and defend the U.S. Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic. A peace activist, he believes information and awareness is the first step toward being free from enslavement from the globalist control system which now threatens humanity. He believes love conquers all fear and it is up to each and every one of us to manifest the solutions and the change that you want to see in this world, because doing this is the very thing that will ensure victory and restoration of the human race from the rising global enslavement system, and will offer hope to future generations. I dont know, Bernie. I saw the word terrorist and just assumed all our rights are suspended and the government has carte blanche to do anything. Am I wrong about that? :). Bingo. Please turn yourself in to the Authorities. Seriously, a number of us truthers that occupy these sites could be used as a fall guy for their plans. they will use our posts and other things to confirm their case. They already class us as extremists dont forget! Its funny Brett, I read your comment, liked it and only noticed who it was when I went to up-vote it lol. Thanks Johno! Guess we are on the same page? Watch out though, some people dont like that Ah yes, gotta dance with the devil to play Flattering when you think about it. I posted that comment by NuttyYahoo its being moderated but I think thats just because its got a link and a picture in it. Just in case it doesnt get trough the exact quote is: The key to tackling extremism is despair. Rob them of their hope that their wild fantasies will win out the day. So we can play the exact same game. Another patsy perhaps a paid crisis actor or mkultra manchurian (ala sirhan sirhan). If he drove the others there and dropped them off, he is a participant and guilty. If so, and it seems questionable, what did he know about what he was doing (as Bernie graciously points out). It would need to be PROVEN in a (risable) court of law IF there is anything remaining of Western society and the much-vaunted rule of law. Apparently there is nothing left. Western laws seem only to apply to Westerners that cannot afford to pay their way out of the situation. If youre wealthy enough, you exhaust the system. If youre elite enough (Hillary), Thanks, Bernie. Great article, very important at this time. These fine fellows were considered as useful when they headed off to Syria, or were conducting recruiting for the same in Europe, to fight against the Assad regime with the U.S. Central bankers proxy mercenary army. Now that they have returned and are biting the hand that feeds and killing the complicit the true nature of blowback has come home to roost. Never letting a good crisis go to waste the European peoples can look forward to having their societies shut down as further advancement of the global police state envisioned by the Central bankers and their entourage of globalist corporations. These attacks are a simple demonstration of the age old axiom, those to whom evil is done do evil in return. Enough said. 