Syrian Peace Deal: UNs Cloak to NATOs DaggerTurkey begins fabricating cross border incidents to justify Brookings prescribed safe havens inside Syria. From the very beginning, US policy makers admitted that Kofi Annans peace mission to Syria was nothing more than a rouse to preserve NATOs proxy forces from total destruction and create safe havens from which to prolong the bloodshed. It was hoped that with established safe havens in Syria, protected by Turkish military forces (Turkey has been a NATO member since 1952) violence and pressure verses the Syrian government could be perpetually increased until it finally collapsed and the carving up of Syria could commence. An alternative is for diplomatic efforts to focus first on how to end the violence and how to gain humanitarian access, as is being done under Annans leadership. This may lead to the creation of safe-havens and humanitarian corridors, which would have to be backed by limited military power. This would, of course, fall short of U.S. goals for Syria and could preserve Asad in power. From that starting point, however, it is possible that a broad coalition with the appropriate international mandate could add further coercive action to its efforts. page 4, Assessing Options for Regime Change, Brookings Institution. And while peace was being peddled by Soros-funded International Crisis Group trustee Kofi Annan, the US, UK, France, and members of the Wests proxy Arab League simultaneously called for Assad to stand down and withdraw troops from secured cities while openly declaring that arms and cash would continue to flow to the rebels. The Friends of Syria summit would even ludicrously declare that wages would be paid to rebels to continue their battle to overthrow Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. Clearly the label peace deal is inappropriate for a proposal that seeks to empower and indeed see one side prevail militarily over another whose hands are purposefully tied. It is an unconditional surrender to foreign-funded terrorists simply labeled as a peace deal. The Brookings Institutions safe havens and humanitarian corridors are meant to be established by NATO-member Turkey, who has been threatening to partially invade Syria for weeks in order to accomplish this. And while Turkey claims this is based on humanitarian concerns, examining Turkeys abysmal human rights record in addition to its own ongoing genocidal campaign against the Kurdish people both within and beyond its borders, it is clear they are simply fulfilling the agenda established by their Western patrons on Wall Street and in the city of London. Now, Turkey is fabricating stories involving Syrian troops firing across the Turkish-Syrian border. The New York Times published these bold accusations before admitting further down that it was unclear what kind of weapons caused the injuries on Sunday around six miles inside Turkish territory, and that there were conflicting accounts about the incident. As are all the accusations used by NATO, the UN, and individual member states to justify meddling in Syrias affairs, these tales involve hearsay from the rebels themselves. It is clear that Turkey, NATO, and the UN are attempting to set the pretext for the establishment of safe havens and humanitarian corridors intended to circumvent the UN Security Council which has seen attempts to green-light military intervention vetoed twice by Russia and China. As the UN peace deal deadline of April 10 comes and goes, we can expect an ever increasing din of propaganda purporting Syrian violations against Turkish sovereignty, the continued propaganda campaign accentuating the victimization of NATOs death squads, and the public roll-out of Brookings Turkish established safe haven within Syrian territory. The UN peace deal was a rouse from the beginning. The West has no intention of leaving Syria intact and will seek all means by which to prevail in toppling the government, carving up the country along sectarian lines, plunging it into perpetual violence as it has Libya, and moving next toward Iran. While it is essential to expose the truth behind Syrias unrest, is also important to identify the corporate-financier interests driving this nefarious agenda and boycott them entirely while seeking out viable local solutions to support instead. If none exist, it is our duty to use our time, money, attention, and resources to create such alternatives instead of perpetuating the self-serving agenda unfolding before us. Ultimately it is we the people paying into this current paradigm that allows it to continue moving forward, therefore it by necessity must be we the people who undermine and ultimately replace it. Tony Cartaluccis articles have appeared on many alternative media websites, including his own at Land Destroyer Report. Read other contributed articles by Tony Cartalucci here. linkwithin_text=Related Articles: 