What Rothschild, Murdoch, Cheney, and Israel Love Most About SyriaBy Claire Bernish Besides sounding like the introduction to a wince-worthy conspiracy quip, the most elementary answer is also nauseatingly cliche as an explanation for the penchant the U.S. government displays for inserting itself in the domestic affairs of nearly every country in the Middle East: Afek, a subsidiary of New Jersey-based Genie Energy, Ltd., announced the discovery of a large liquid oil reservoir and requested an extension of its exploration license for areas in Northern Israel. After having spent over three years in active exploration from the time initial hydrocarbon measurements and geological tests hinted at the presence of such a reserve, Afeks discovery might have been welcome news all around were it not contentiously located within Israeli-occupied Syria, in the region known as the Golan Heights. Initial findings from the drilling confirm the discovery of an oil reservoir in the Golan and further justifies continuing the exploration program, stated Afeks request. We need more time for this. While Israel and Afek might dismissively refer to Syrias Golan Heights as Northern Israel in documentation,international law definitively marks the region as occupied by foreign forces making the U.S. companys controversial oil exploration arrogantly hegemonic, as well as illegal. Taking full advantage of the public announcement about the findings, the next day Genie Oil and Gas proceeded to publicize the names of new appointees who will join the eyebrow-raising Rupert Murdoch, Dick Cheney, and Lord Jacob Rothschild on the Strategic Advisory Board (SAB). Those members are: Dr. Lawrence Summers, 71st Secretary of the Treasury under President Clinton and Director of the National Economic Council under Pres. Obama; former Louisiana Senator Mary Landrieu, who is credited with helping pass the U.S.-Israel Energy Cooperation Bill while she chaired the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources; former governor of New Mexico, Bill Richardson, who became an industry insider after serving as the Clinton administrations Energy Secretary; and former Director of Central Intelligence, R. James Woolsey, who co-founded the U.S. Energy Security Council. Still more controversially, Chairman of Genie Israel Holdings, Ltd. former Knesset member Efraim Effie Eitam, who served as minister of both National Infrastructure as well as Housing and Construction wouldnt seem to be a desirable associate. His opinion on Israels imperative mission delivered during a soldiers memorial service in 2006 drew the ire of thousands. He asserted Israel would have to: Expel most of the Judea and Samaria Arabs from here. We cannot be with all these Arabs and we cannot give up the land, because we have already seen what they do there. Some of them may be able to stay under certain conditions, but most of them will have to go. We will have to make another decision, to remove the Israeli Arabs from the political system. Also here things are clear and simple: We have raised a fifth column, a group of traitors of the first degree, and therefore we cannot continue to approve such a hostile and great presence inside Israels political system. Israel might have garnered the support and sympathy befitting outside perception of the manufactured nation as an ostensible underdog intent only on survival at least at one time. Patience and tolerance for Israels self-interested actions the latest being the nations refusal of assistance in the Syrian refugee crisis are wearing thin, even among its staunchest backers. Considering Israels well-documented human rights abuses and hegemonic tendencies, that it has escaped sanctions thus far seems inexplicable. In the meantime, an effective movement known as BDS (Boycott, Divestment, and Sanction) called for in 2005 by Palestinians determined to see Israel held accountable to international law and basic human rights has rapidly gained momentum worldwide. Continuing to do business as usual with Israel might leave the U.S. holding a hot potato. Image Credit This article (What Rothschild, Murdoch, Cheney, and Israel Love Most About Syria) is free and open source. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Claire Bernish andtheAntiMedia.org. Anti-Media Radio airs weeknights at 11pm Eastern/8pm Pacific. If you spot a typo, emailedits@theantimedia.org. Stunning list of the Globalist Mafias top echelon heavy hitters. TPTB believe they OWN the entire globe, not just Syria and have their tentacles in EVERYTHING. Always keep a close eye on Summers, as the top International Bankster henchman he typically leads new major policy directives, both domestic and international. It was Summers [and Rubin] who spearheaded the dismantling of the Glass Steagall Act. He was sent to Russia in the mid 90s to advise on the privatization of publicly own assets for pennies on the dollar thus creating a powerful oligarchy with internationalist ties (7 of 8 ethnic Jews, likely Zionist sympathizers?) thus ensconcing the Russian economic and political system in a state of globalism deep capture. As outlined in the 11/2013 IMF meeting, Summers is working towards implementation of a global digital currency and cashless society, as such he has been named to the advisory board of 21 Inc., a startup that will make smartphone chips for Bitcoin transactions. Good comment. Yet another reason not to swallow the Bitcoin koolaid. Anything that the oligarchs support Im steering clear of. Judaism, the official state religion of Israel, teaches that since Gentiles are not human, they must be deceived, looted, enslaved, raped, and killed. Yes, but so does Christianity and Islam have the same. Thus proving they so deserve each other. Rubbish! Quote an authoritative Christian document that teaches that non-Christians are not human. Quote an authoritative Christian document that teaches that non-Christians should be deceived looted enslaved raped and killed. Sure. Deuteronomy 7 (KJV) 7 When the Lord thy God shall bring thee into the land whither thou goest to possess it, and hath cast out many nations before thee, the Hittites, and the Girgashites, and the Amorites, and the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, and the Hivites, and the Jebusites, seven nations greater and mightier than thou; 2 And when the Lord thy God shall deliver them before thee; thou shalt smite them, and utterly destroy them; thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor shew mercy unto them: 5 But thus shall ye deal with them; ye shall destroy their altars, and break down their images, and cut down their groves, and burn their graven images with fire. The Old Law is replaced by the New Law (Hebrews 7:18; Hebrews 10:9; Colossians 2:14; Jeremias 31:31-32; Malachias 2:8-12; Hebrews 8:5-13; Mark 7:7-9), so Deuteronomy 7:5-7 cannot be honestly construed as Christian, but merely a historical note. THIS is Christian: Thou shalt LOVE thy neighbour as thyself. Then the bible isnt the infallible word of anything. You cant have it both ways. What an illogical non-sequitur you vomit forth! The Mosaic Covenant was CONDITIONAL. Obedience to God was to be rewarded and disobedience punished. The Old Testament is full of the disobedience and the Judgment against the Israelites, so, as we see even in the Old Testament, the people were warned there would be a New Covenant. All perfectly consistent. All infallible. More deceit from you. Nope.. and as you like to throw scripture about,.. Matthew 5.17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. Looks like youd better get busy obeying all 613 OT laws, over 100 of them are to do with animal sacrifices. What an illogical non-sequitur you vomit forth! Did your head rotate 360 degrees, followed by projectile pea green vomit, before or after typing that? Are you dyslexic? .till all be fulfilled. Matthew 5:18 John 19:28-30 Once all the prophecies were fulfilled in Jesus, the Old Law was REPLACED, as the plain language says: Jeremias 31:31-32 Behold the days shall come, saith the Lord, and I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Juda: Not according to the covenant which I made with their fathers, in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt: the covenant which they made void, and I had dominion over them, saith the Lord. Hebrews 7:18 There is indeed a setting aside of the former commandment, because of the weakness and unprofitableness thereof. Hebrews 10:9 Then said I: Behold, I come to do thy will, O God: he taketh away the first, that he may establish that which followeth. Matthew 21:43 Josue (Joshua) 23:16 When you shall have TRANSGRESSED THE COVENANT of the Lord your God, which he hath made with you, and shall have served strange gods, and adored them: then shall the indignation of the Lord rise up quickly and speedily against you, and YOU SHALL BE TAKEN AWAY FROM THIS EXCELLENT LAND, which he hath delivered to you. etc., etc. etc. Are you dyslexic? .till all be fulfilled. Matthew 5:18 I quoting from the King James bible. Its not all been fulfilled, Jesus has yet to return, we have yet to engage in the final battle, etc. The law has not been replaced, Heaven and Earth have not passed away. Is the bible infallible or not? Just because you say so? Read and think carefully because John 19:28-30 contradicts you again: Afterwards, Jesus knowing that all things were now accomplished, that the scripture might be fulfilled, said: I thirst.And bowing his head, he gave up the ghost. What part of all thing accomplished and scripture fulfilled dont you want to understand? With His death on His Cross, the Old Law was dead, replaced, and dramatically demonstrated by the miraculous tearing of the temple veil: And behold the veil of the temple was rent in two from the top even to the bottom, and the earth quaked, and the rocks were rent. Matthew 27:51 Just because you say so? Since when is quoting the bible some ones say so? I think you are completely mad. Youre wrong, try reading what it actually says instead of what you think it says. You think you can develop a theology from your mis-reading a half-verse? Jesus said the Old Law would not pass away until the prophesies were fulfilled. He fulfilled those prophesies and the Old Law died with Him on the Cross. I have cited numerous verses attesting that the Old Law is replaced. Your half-verse mis-read cannot stand up to the totality. To be blunt, you are just another Judaizing Double-Covenant heretic. If you have no new evidence to bring to the table. Yet again I remind you that I quoted from the bible. It is either the infallible word of god, or it isnt which is it? The Bible is infallible in its entirety. You, however, have demonstrated that you are completely fallible. So if the bible is infallible in its entirety, and Ive just quoted from it, Ive said nothing else, then how does that make me completely fallible? You have an extremely bad case of double standards. You quoted a phrase and ignored other verses. The Bible isnt the problem; you are the problem. No mate, Im staying on topic, you are dancing around it, cherry picking scripture that has no relationship, and then having the bald faced nerve to accuse me of being false. I have no problem at all. Its you who is doing the arguing. LOL. As the plain language of the Bible states, Jesus fulfilled the prophesies with His death on His Cross and, as the plain language of the Bible states, once He fulfilled the prophesies, the Old Law was replaced with the one and only New Covenant for all who want be saved. Period. No dancing, except among the hypocrites and Pharisees who mock God, pretending He does useless works. The bible says no such thing, it says till heaven and Earth pass away and ALL is fulfilled. Jesus dying on the cross was just the beginning, he will be returning, then you can claim ALL has been fulfilled. Maybe you have one of those Protestant Bibles that have all those inconvenient chapters torn out. THE complete Bible has this at John 19:28-30: Afterwards, Jesus knowing that ALL things were now accomplished, that the scripture might be FULFILLED, said: I thirst.And bowing his head, he gave up the ghost. Maybe you have one of those Protestant Bibles would be a valid argument, so Ive checked all of them including the Greek Strongs Concordance, they all say the same for Matthew 5.17-18. Heaven and Earth pass away before all is fulfilled. ALL things were now accomplished, that the scripture might be FULFILLED It wasnt fulfilled, might doesnt = HAS. The statement of the purpose does not negate the clear declarative. Think of a familiar analog, the Second Amendment. That leftists misunderstand the meaning of a well-regulated militia, does not invalidate the declarative right to keep and bear arms. In the same vein, because you misunderstand the purpose clause that scripture might be fulfilled, does not negate the declarative ALL things accomplished. Mosaic Law dead, kaput, finite, nada. Im not American and I have zero interest in American politics, which has absolutely nothing in common with the bible. Im not the one misunderstanding. You claim the bible is infallible, if youre preaching it but you dont practice what it says, youre a hypocrite. That may be a record-breaking string for the most illogical non-sequiturs in one paragraph. Classic example of the pot calling the kettle black. You cant stay on topic. LOL You will notice that I have been addressing your every lie. Since you lie on multiple topics, of course, I will expose your lie where you have run. Oh I see, its not a lie if you quote from the bible, but it is if anyone else does. Youre double standards are truly superior. LOL Bring it on. It is your faulty private interpretations that are the liesmegaphoning a phrase while ignoring the full verse or chapter, faulty parsing of purpose clauses, ignoring numerous verses that are explicitly against your private interpretations. All of it, familiar tricks of the rabbis and there accomplices. Im not interpreting anything, Im quoting, big difference. megaphoning a phrase ? whats that supposed to mean, I dont do literary shouting with bold typeface and the cap lock on, its rude. The bible says that, Im not interpreting it. Youre wrong and too immature to admit it. Youve insulting, bullying and threatening, youre just full of crap. Which says to me that you dont believe your own BS, youre role playing. Holy Scripture documents the commissions given to the Church and documents the authority given to the Popes. Holy Scripture commands obedience to BOTH the oral and written teachings of Jesus Christ as handed down through His Apostles, Disciples, and Fathers. Holy Scripture forbids private interpretation. Holy Scripture documents that the Mosaic Law is a dead letter. You fail in all those. Dont be ridiculous, The NT was completed in 1611 by 8 members of the Church of England. There were (and still are) no original texts to translate. The oldest manuscripts we have were written down hundreds of years after the last apostle died. There are over 8000 of these old manuscripts, with no two alike. The King James translators used none of these in any case. Instead, they edited previous translations to create a version their king and parliament would approve. So, 21st Century Christians believe the word of god is a book edited in the 17th century from 16th century translations of 8,000 contradictory copies of 4th century scrolls that claim to be copies of lost letters written in the 1st century. Dont be ridiculous yourself. The Church depended on oral preaching and written fragments and the Vetus Latina until the New Testament was completed through the work of St. Jerome in the 4th century A.D. He was fluent in Aramaic, Hebrew, Greek, and Latin. He had and was competent to translate original documents that have been long lost to us and also had corroborating documents from the Early Fathers, some of which we still have. He also had the Septuagint, because there was no complete Hebrew translation of the Old Testament. He meticulous winnowed wheat from chaff. His Latin Vulgate translation of both the Old and New Testaments was commonly used for a millennium before it was finally canonized as official by the Church at the Council of Trent. Amusingly, there are people today who have neither the documents nor the linguistic fluency who think they can vet gnostic, Masoretic, hermetic, and other scriptural frauds. Which church are you talking about? I dont care what you do, Im not the one going to be judging and condemning you, its up to you what you do. So follow the bible, dont follow the bible, its doesnt affect my future in the slightest. Im not your problem, same as your problems are not my problems LOL. Just a suggestion, but get a life of your own. Hypocrite and Pharisee, you select a convenient phrase and ignore numerous inconvenient verses of the Bible and have the gall to pretend you follow the Bible. Jesus preached to obey the Old Law until all was fulfilled. When He fulfilled the prophesies of the Old Law, it was REPLACED exactly as the Bible prophesied. For amen I say unto you, till heaven and earth pass, one jot, or one tittle shall not pass of the law, till all be fulfilled. Matthew 5:18 Afterwards, Jesus knowing that all things were now accomplished, that the scripture might be fulfilled, said: I thirst.And bowing his head, he gave up the ghost. John 19:28-30 Once all the prophecies were fulfilled in Jesus, the Old Law was, as the plain language says, REPLACED, MADE VOID, BLOTTED OUT, SET ASIDE, TAKEN AWAY, ANNULLED and fulfilled in the NEW Covenant: Hebrews 7:18, Hebrews 10:9, Colossians 2:14, Jeremias 31:31-32, Malachias 2:8-12, Hebrews 8:5-13, Mark 7:7-9 An important sign that the Old Law is dead: And behold the veil of the temple was rent in two from the top even to the bottom, and the earth quaked, and the rocks were rent. Matthew 27:51 Its not rocket science. The Earth has not passed away, the laws still apply. Jesus is not the Earth. Restating your error does not diminish your mistake. You think you can develop a theology from your mis-reading a half-verse? Jesus said the Old Law would not pass away until the prophesies were fulfilled. He fulfilled those prophesies and the Old Law died with Him on the Cross. I have cited numerous verses attesting that the Old Law is replaced. Your half-verse mis-read cannot stand up to the totality. To be blunt, you are just another Judaizing Double-Covenant heretic. Judaizers mock God. Even though the Bible contradicts them repeatedly, they pretend that the Old Law still saves. If the Old Law could still save, why did God become man, suffer and die on His Cross? If the Old Law could still save, Jesus works were unnecessary, wasted. God is no fool engaging in pointless works. Just like their Talmud, Judaizers deny the Bible and treat God like a fool who submits to the rabbis. God smiled and said: My sons have defeated Me, My sons have defeated Me! Gods sons defeated him with their arguments. Rabbi Yehoshua was correct in his contention that a view confirmed by majority vote must be accepted, even where God Himself holds the opposite view. P.S. You forgot to upvote yourself that time. [laughing] Jesus said he came to fulfill the old laws, he preached to obey all the old laws better than the law keepers, so no there are no new laws More deceit from you. Jesus preached to obey the Old Law until all was fulfilled. When He fulfilled the prophesies of the Old Law, it was REPLACED (as I cited above). For amen I say unto you, till heaven and earth pass, one jot, or one tittle shall not pass of the law, till all be fulfilled. Matthew 5:18 John 19:28-30 Once all the prophecies were fulfilled in Jesus, the Old Law was, as the plain language says, REPLACED, MADE VOID, BLOTTED OUT, SET ASIDE, TAKEN AWAY, ANNULLED and fulfilled in the NEW Covenant, the NEW Israel, the NEW Chosen People: Hebrews 7:18 An important sign that the Old Law is dead: And behold the veil of the temple was rent in two from the top even to the bottom, and the earth quaked, and the rocks were rent. Matthew 27:51 Please grow a brain do some simple research. Christianity and Islam got along for the most part in peace for millennia UNTIL the Khazar rothschild banking cabal seized control of the money supply. Please grow a brain .. how kindergarten. Wiki. The Crusades were military campaigns sanctioned by the Catholic Church in the Middle Ages. Pope Urban II authorized the First Crusade in 1095 Why do you make such claims about things that are so easy to debunk? Wiki The Rothschild family is a highly wealthy family descending from Mayer Amschel Rothschild, a court Jew to the GermanLandgraves of Hesse-Kassel, in the Free City of Frankfurt, who established his banking business in the 1760s. http://www.thelatinlibrary.com/imperialism/notes/islamchron.html What was that you were saying? .. do it with the help from dumb-retards-in-mass by their watching distracting propaganda in news media ... Try doing your own research, hypocrite. It is premature for you to be smug. Please read some HISTORY. The Crusades were called because Muslims (usually instigated by Jews, much as the Jews instigated many of the Roman persecutions of Christians) were attacking peaceful Christian pilgrims to the Holy Land. You talk about reading some history There is no evidence of Romans persecuting Christians, the only historian to claim such, Tacitus, was proven to be 6th century CE fraud. The word actually use was chrestus = good people, not christus = christians. There are no examples of Christians defending innocent life, on the contrary every example proves the complete opposite, youre mass murdering barbarians. You are very bold with your lies, so are easily refuted. We have primary and secondary sources for the persecution decrees and judicial proceedings under Nero, Domitian, Decius, Diocletian, Septimus Severus, Maximinus, et al. More than two dozen of the first Popes were martyred. We have descriptions of the torments. One of hundreds of examples: Having been condemned September 27, 235 A.D in metallum (to the mines) for his Catholic Faith, Pope St. Pontian was force-marched from the port, Othoca, to the Sardinian lead mines. His left eye was gouged out with a dagger and the socket cauterized with molten iron. The joints of his left foot were burned to cause painful scarification thereby impairing walking. A nerve, the peroneal nerve, was severed by stabbing behind his right knee to cause a foot drop, further impairing walking. He was branded on the forehead. Iron rings were soldered around his ankles then, manacled, his ankles were tethered by a heavy chain to a painfully constricting iron ring around his waist so short that he could only stoop, never to stand straight again. After being burned, stabbed, chained and branded, he was scourged sixty lashes against a stone obelisk, then immediately sent with pick and shovel into the choking poisonous dust of the lead mines to work twenty of every twenty-four hours, subsisting (between beatings) on one meal of coarse bread and water daily until late in January 236 A.D. when he was martyred by sword. That was a weak trick that tried to sidestep the persecutions of Christians. There are few Latin records of Jesus Christ Himself, but innumerable documents about Christians and the persecutions of Christians. Your use of the Christ-denying C.E. is one more clue to your hermeneutic of deceit: judaism101.proboards dot com/thread/3/judaisms-hermeneutic-deceit News flash. I dont give a single sh*t what you think. The bible is what it is. Of course it doesnt matter what I think of you. BUT. especially since you have now been warned about the biblical verses against your dual covenant heresy, I fear that your half-baked, half-verse excuses will not be convincing at His Judgment Seat. You will definitely have an eternity to care about that. Val Brooker, No thanks I can read for myself, and I have way better morals than try to coerce someone else to believe something the bible doesnt say. Get a life of your own. Just a suggestion of course. What you play at one day a week, I live as a way of life, full time. For me, its not a one day a week hobby. Did I say that I do nothing else? I told you what I did yesterday. You have no charism to read hearts, minds, and souls. Stop reinventing me in your warped imagination to massage your own ego. All you are doing is proving you are not a Christian, you are role playing so you can do the judging instead. Commandment no. 9. thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor. The fact you are doing exactly that, proves you are no Christian. I prayed for you on a Sunday and you insisted I do nothing else on any other day. You dont know me. You had no basis for your accusation. It is you who bear false witness. Even though it is becoming ever more clear that you are of ill will, I have been praying for you since Sunday and will continue to do so as I stated aboveperpetually. Wait! Dont tell me! . . . . . . Um, NO CENTRAL BANK!?? Excellent article referencing excellent sources, Fr. Denis Fahey and Mr. Hugh Akins, two of the best! You can find the books of both Fr. Fahey and Mr. Akins here: isoc dot ws/books/ 