The Ghost in the Machine and Mass Mind ControlBy Jay Dyer The scientific method, having now attained the mythical status of grand narrative explanatory power, must be understood as only a tool for how to learn empirical facts about the natural world. Constituted as such, by its very nature, it is impossible to use a tool as itself a means by which the totality of reality is conceived, when the empirical scientific method itself cannot be known or proven to be the case, through the scientific method. Understanding this fact, analysis can be had of various luminaries and experts of the new mythos, in infamous characters like Bertrand Russell, the Huxleys, etc., but a lesser-known important name is that of Arthur Koestler, and his reductionist scientism should here be highlighted. A former Hungarian Marxist, Koestler found home in London even being raised to the Order of Commander of the British Empire for his contributions to culture. The amazing doublethink behind this title will become more apparent as we consider how his ideas would contribute to the added force of the growing technological and psychological warfare methodologies up to our day. Publishing his The Ghost in the Machine in 1967, Koestler took the implications of reductionist materialism to new lows in openly discussing the forced drugging and manipulation of the public. Koestler cites a mind control presentation in San Franciscoby Dean Saunders in 1961: Koestler proceeds to the discussion of the possibility of reengineering RNA and creating increased suggestibility through forced public drugging, citing Dr. Holgar Hyden from the same symposium: The unifying paradigm is radical, pragmatism scientism for both the high tech Psy Ops programs and the human genome modification and destruction. This is what we call technocracy, which is not only rule by experts, but also the rule of experts with a specific ideological commitment to strictnaturalism. Koestlers work is not only premised on the presupposition of reductionist naturalism, but explores the possibility of forcing the evolutionary progress (which is really a dysgenics strategy of devolution). Progress is only progress to those who have a benchmark by which to make such a value judgment, and the ruling elite of our day have a form commitment to their progress alone. Progress to the establishment is your digress, yet as I wrote, the educated class is still almost completely duped in our day to buy into the deception, when the deceptions goal is to stamp out the human spirit en toto, in Huxleys final revolution. This attack is not just on the genome, but on the neurological processes and memory, linked with RNA, many of which modify the encodedinformation. The belowshows MKULTRA was a plan for the masses, not merely spies and defectors. About Dr. Holgar Hyden, we read from Barbara Lusk in her Building a Better Brain: A watershed event occurred in 1965 when Krech arranged a multi-session symposium on Brain, Biochemistry and Behavior at the American Association for the Advancement of Science meeting. Approximately 2,000 attendees heard prominent geneticists, anatomists, biochemists, physiologists, pharmacologists, neurologists and psychologists who discussed the tantalizing evidence on the role of RNA. Biochemist Bernard Agranoff of the University of Michigan reported that administering various RNA or protein-synthesis inhibitors before or just after training had significant adverse effects on the retention of newly acquired learning in goldfish. In other experiments, James McGaugh and Lewis Petrinovich (both former students of Krech) demonstrated that increasing RNA synthesis by administering strychnine improved learning. Psychiatrist Ewen Cameron of McGill University reported that yeast RNA administered to elderly people suffering from dementia had a positive effect on their memory. Researchers at Abbott Labs reported that Cylert (magnesium pemoline) enhanced learning in rats and, more important, that human trials were planned. In both his introductory remarks and closing commentary at the symposium, Krech worried out loud. The potential benefits of this research, he agreed, were enormous. But the social and ethical questions raised by this work were of the same magnitude as those resulting from the achievements of the atomic physicists: If the biochemical tools are developed, will governments be tempted to manipulate the behavior of their citizens? Should scientists or governments tamper with individuals natural endowments? Should such potions, once developed, be used only to treat cognitive deficiencies or should they be used to enhance normal functioning? Who gets what and when? Who bears the cost of these treatments? Who decides? Who keeps watch over those who do? Indeed. Im sure Dr. Ewan Cameron and Arthur Koestler were altruistic and genuinelyinterested in healingtheelderly fromdementia no doubt Cameron wept at night with panged conscience, following his torturous human experiments at Mount Royal. Koestler and his wife committed suicide together in their old age, and Cameron was a maniacal psychopath who headed up the worst aspects of the MKULTRA experimentation. What the above scholarly article from the American Psychological Association (itself formed by Rockefeller and MKULTRA) luminaries in concord with the Tavistock Institute plan is only the best for all of us. Meanwhile, they also laugh about the plan to commit genocide. Are you able to parse this out, or are you chemically lobotomized beyond the point of having your double mind integrated from its doublethink? See also: The Ghost in the Machine: The Forced Evolution of Man by: Brent Jessop You can read more from Jay Dyer at his site Jays Analysis, where this article first appeared. the Docs developed a conscious (ipsofacto) sad they didnt see it before hand. Thank you, excellent background and very well said, cathartic eloquence. Science really is a tool and scientific paradigms are models not absolutes, true science is non-dogmatic. The leaders of the Church of Technocracy and their priests have hypnotized themselves. Incidentally, long ago evolutionary biologists rejected the concept of progress, having acknowledged that evolution is a process of adaptation to the natural environment. There is no directionality in the process itself. It is an error of the human ego to assume otherwise. Now that the Pathocrats have slammed into walls of diminishing returns and a natural world that will not fully yield to their visions, progress can only come top down via mendacity, poisoning, altering genomes, and mass scale terraforming. Its a cult madness not science, not even close. In our favor, Mother Natures blowback can be a b-, the unraveling of GMOs is a taste. 