How WiFi and Other EMFs Cause Biological HarmBy Kevin Samson Peer-reviewed scientific studies have drawn conclusions that should concern us all, but particularly for young children and pregnant women. Government agencies are even doing battle amongst themselves over outdated scientific information that still impacts current regulations. Yet another credible voice is now sounding the alarm about the pervasive dangers of Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs) Professor Martin Pall, PhD professor of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Science at Washington State University, Pullman. His lecture can be viewed below, as well as a summary of his findings amid a flood of other scientific research. It is worth noting that Palls concerns have been echoed by others throughout the field of biochemistry and health science. Professor Pall states unequivocally in his lecture in Oslo, Norway: I think this is going to be one of the major issues in the next few years. Most people are not aware of this, and the people who are mostly know the old data and theres a lot of new [information] on this thats extremely, extremely important. Pall shows us how, with an increasing preponderance of so-called smart meters, smart phones and other microwave-emitting technologies and infrastructure, the health of the public is in danger; that our young are the most at risk and that urgent action to protect people is now required. Prof. Palls extensive research over recent decades into this issue shows that: Now is the time to become informed and keep your friends and family up to date on new research that shows the threats some of our new technologies pose to the more vulnerable among us. How many times do we need to hear the assurances of the scientific establishment that they have covered all bases in advising governments to create health guidelines that later turn out to be woefully inadequate? Additional source: I once saw a pie chart that said that 70% of studies NOT paid for by the telcom companies said there was a measurable negative effect of emfs and 30% said there wasnt AND another pie chart that said that 70% of the studies paid for by the telcom companies show no measurable effect and 30% of those did. Essentially the numbers were flipped depending on who backed the study, so I have to agree with you studies should be taken with a grain of salt along with who paid for it. Exactly and this chart showing 70% effect 30% was funded by people who will get profit from showing effects. I hold PhD in neurology/toxicology and by the same way as peopleshowing effect either by cherry picking or funding, I can prove you that water is bad and smoking healthy. You dont get studies with a grain of salt only really learn basic(in field you read studies) and always check methodology(many studies by purpose or mistake contain so many flaws that affects results, probably 70% of studies are flawed) and funding indeed. 