Neo-Con Hypocrites Leverage Human Rights Against ChinaTony Cartalucci, Contributor It illustrates once again the unified agenda of both Neo-Cons like Max Boot and liberals like Hillary Clinton and the Obama administration. It also represents but one bizarre facet of an unfolding charade the US is attempting to use against China ahead of talks aimed at exacting concessions on everything from economic policy to yielding to the West over Syria. Max Boot makes his astounding comments regarding the recent row between the United States, their long-cultivated activist, Chen Guangcheng (also known as the blind activist), and the government of China whom the United States is preparing to meet with for talks. Clearly Max Boot represents a cadre of individuals who have been in reality the greatest violators of human rights in the world, and thus, his column in Commentary titled, Standing Up for Human Rights in China, is an astounding and transparent example of the exploitation of otherwise noble principles. It should be mentioned that NEDs board of directors, like Boot, are card-carrying Neo-Conservatives, pro-war, and represent some of the largest corporate-financier interests on Earth whose policies and actions directly contradict NEDs alleged mission of supporting freedom around the world. Boot also fails to mention the fact that Chinas forced sterilization and abortion policies are funded and supported, even whitewashed by the UN Population Fund which is itself directly funded by the US.The UN also coincidentally served as a vehicle for Boot and his colleagues crimes against humanity, most recently in Libya. Chinas policies were also designed, pioneered, and carried out globally by predominantly American and British eugenicists including the Carnegie Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation, and even USAID who wascaught forcibly sterilizing hundreds of thousands of Peruvian women in the late 1990s. It was in fact the Anglo-Americans who laid the groundwork, and even literally the German programs that Hilters genocidal eugenics cult rose from. So then one is left asking whether Boots column is satire or if he truly believes his readership is so poorly informed, so intellectually stunted, and so emotionally compromised that they will believe his rhetoric at face value. Or perhaps Boots column is simply a template for the compromised corporate media to copy and paste from, as we see Reuters already doing here,echoing Boots talking point a day later, regarding Chens humiliating Chinas internal security apparatus. Indeed, a long-cultivated US State Department asset making a miraculous escape on the eve of a high profile meeting between US and Chinese representatives, after China has repeatedly blocked US ambitions to ravage Syria a war Boot is an ecstatic proponent of is yet another example of how the Wests most ghoulish mechanization are propelled with facades constructed of the most noble intentions for the expressed purpose of putting pressure on those resisting them. Undoubtedly the corporate-media will spread to the four corners of the globe Boots talking points, preying on anyone unwilling to spend the five minutes it takes to look behind the curtain and see what is truly at work. Tony Cartaluccis articles have appeared on many alternative media websites, including his own at Land Destroyer Report. Read other contributed articles by Tony Cartalucci here. linkwithin_text=Related Articles: 