SHOCK: Court Delivers MASSIVE Second Amendment Ruling... This Is VERY Bad According to recent reports, a Connecticut court just ruled that a suit against the company that manufactured the gun used in the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting good go forwardeven though their is a 2015 federal law prohibiting this very thing. The Washington Examiner reports that the families of the victims filed a suit against Remington Arms Co., over the Bushmaster AR-15 that was used by Adam Lanza in the shootings, arguing that such a weapon should have never been on the market in the first place. Remington cited a 2005 federal law that protects firearms manufacturers from being sued in such cases, but the Connecticut Superior Court denied that argument. Instead, Connecticut State Judge Barbara Bellis allowed the suit to continue and denied any calls for dismissal. We are thrilled that the gun companies motion to dismiss was denied, Josh Koskoff, the lead attorney for the plaintiffs commented. The families look forward to continuing their fight in court. This is absolutely ludicrous. What if we applied this logic to every product? Would car companies be held responsible for the actions of drunk drivers? And lets not forget that the Second Amendment protects our right to bear arms. What do you think of this ruling? 