Virginia Shooting Hoax - Theres Always Someone To Tell The StoryBy Peekay22 In all the staged hoaxes the script there seems to be a witness or survivor to tell the story. Vicki Gardner was the person to do this at the Virginia Shooting Hoax. Shot in the back from close range by a hollow point bullet she amazingly survived to tell the story. She had 2 weeks to perfect it but still screwed up. She is obviously NOT a professional crisis actress. Yeah, if she was, she wouldnt be able to stop laughing and smiling after losing her kids. A whole lot of chattel by-product liberally cascaded onto the whirling fan blades of the MSM summarily aimed at all the dupes..theres a sucker born every minute Do you know how police determine someone is guilty, because when a person lies the story changes by little bits. You have to pay attention to notice and often there are facial reactions that give it away. This is the second interview and her story is changes by little bits, she is adding more and embellishing, a dead give away. You see for some odd reason the truth is unforgettable but a made up story (lie) is always changing. Great post, Mike. Could you post a link to the source of this video? Im required by law to attend refresher courses to renew my CCW license every few years, and the last time I went our instructor had changed up a bit from previously to show a fuzzy police video of a perp shooting his girlfriend (she survived), and then being shot himself, several times before he finally went down. The point the instructor was obviously making was that its rare that one or two shots kill. I would like to send a link of this video to him for use in his classes, as this surgeon makes the point far more eloquently than any fuzzy police video or verbal lecture possibly could. Incidentally, this instructor (a former LEO who has had to kill in the line of duty) likes to say to his students: How many times should you shoot an attacker? Until he stops doing what you dont want him to do. The first 20 minutes or so of this excellent video explains why. Yup, I figured it was another gun control False-Flag. At least it is not armor piercing Not yet anyways. I bet theyre working on it. Two weeks! Its a media miracle. anyone that went through all that would be traumatized and shooken up. They wouldnt be able to sit in a hard straight chair without squirming and shifting with those injuries. You would see expressions of pain as well as, being haggard.. The woman supposedly just lost a kidney. A person would be propped up in a bed or a sofa at best with the injuries she supposedly has at the two week mark. She also doesnt look or sound like a person that is on pain killers either. Yep, this is a uber fail for being believable. I was hunched up for two weeks after a simple hernia operation, taking shallow breaths to protect the stitches and reduce the pain, not sitting up waving my arms around, laughing. This woman acts like shes at a Tupperware party, not like just two weeks earlier she saw two people shot to death three feet from her and was herself shot in the back with a hollow point round. Maybe shes just the gleeful idiot she seems, but that must have quite the support girdle she had on that day (forget angels). Someone alert the DOD, these things should be standard issue for our troops in the field. So, five minutes and no further shots, paramedics presumably en route, and the cops asked her to GET UP AND WALK? No, worse, ASKED A GUNSHOT VICTIMS OPINION ON THE MATTER AND TOOK HER WORD FOR IT? There must have been blood everywhere! They may not always be the brightest bulbs on the tree, but what cop would have a victim whod been shot in the back get up and walk away? If the wound or bullet were anywhere near her spine she could have been paralyzed for life. Assuming any of this really happened the way they say it did, of course. My theory is its a cover-up: Adam Lanza did it. Thank YOU. As for the CCW thing, only for the last half century or so, wherever it was legal. Before that I was too young to vote. I miss Gene Rosen ;( Her husband reports: I dont think she ever felt like she was in danger after she got up and walked to the ambulance after being shot, but she didnt know the extent of her injuries at that point, but the surgeon told me that a couple of centimeters and she wouldnt be walking and a couple of centimeters more and she wouldnt be alive. There is zero evidence this woman was no shot and dozens of witnesses her injuries at the hospital. There is a difference between a hoax (ie a faked shooting with actors and fake blood, etc) and a false flag shooting, where actual deaths occur but the real perpetrators are hidden away while someone else is scapegoated. To confuse hoaxes with false flag operations is to confuse life with death, pretending with shifting blame for real evil. People with no experience in the many and diverse ways people respond to trauma (some cry, some laugh to cover up their pain, etca fact known to all psychologists) give their amateur diagnosis: shes faking. People who have no experience in body language give their amateur judgements. Such people have a preconceived notion that the event is faked and that the people they are judging are actors. Its easy to call someones story bullshit. That is hardly evidence of anything but cognitive dissonance when a story does not match your cherished illusions. There are hoaxes (Donald Trump claiming he has evidence Obama was not born in the US) and there are false flags: the Gulf of Tonkin accident blamed on the North Vietnamese to rationalize attacking NV, the Reichtag fire Hitler blamed on the communists when his own people had done it, etc. They should not be confused and anyone who claims they can see that a person is not really grieving or not really traumatized or was not really shot is simply giving their opinion, unsupported by any evidence. With 400,000 gun deaths since 9/11, including over 150,000 murders (mostly family and friends) and over 2500 mass shootings, it is totally absurd to claim a shooting was faked in order to justify gun confiscation. Why would one more shooting, or ten more, make a difference after thousands? This alleged motive ignores the fact that with a gun murder rate 90% higher than all other advanced nations and over 90% of the public supporting rational gun laws like universal background checks (and 85% of gun owners), that the reason for a lack of action on gun law reform is not a lack of shootings or deaths but the fact that the Republican Party is paid off by the gun lobby, representing the gun makers, to thwart the will of the people. This crime against democracy is masked by allegations that mass shootings are hoaxes, perpetrated to create momentum for gun law reform. No leaders are calling for gun confiscation, so that is a straw man, easily attacked. Even if all semi-automatics WERE confiscated or bought back, there would still be 290 million guns in the US, 1/3 of all private guns in the world. So the deep promoters of such conspiracy theories (which also poison the well of evidence-based conspiracy allegations), using lies about gun confiscation and crisis actors and a vast conspiracy of parents, students, police, nurses, doctors, and neighbors, are the merchants of death, who put profits above public safety, whose profits spike after mass shootings, which then are claimed to be fake. Shame on all of you who buy such cynical manipulation and resort to such cruel judgements to those who have lost their family members, children, and friends in such shootings. Are there false flag operations? Yes, I suspect the But there are also even more real mass shootings where the victims are real and the killer is known, as with the right wing anti-abortionist murders a few weeks back. People with critical minds must make these distinctions, since most people just repeat what they are told whether by the MSM or activistpost provocateurs. 