West Conjures Fake Syrian GovernmentSmokescreen meant to cover open-backing of foreign Al Qaeda terrorists inside Syria, while panicking disrupting Syrian unity. Predictably, the Western arranged confab in Doha, Qatar has seen the selection and approval by the US and its allies of a new opposition coalition to serve as the face of militants fighting inside Syria. This was in response to overwhelming international condemnation to what has become an open proxy war fought against Syria by Western interests and its regional allies. It is a repeat of the now catastrophically failed NATO intervention in Libya that has left the nation mired in genocidal sectarian and tribal violence, a weak, ineffectual client-regime, and human rights abuses dwarfing in reality, the now confirmed fabrications used by NATO ahead of military operations early in 2011. France and the Arab League have already reapplied their stamp of approval on the new coalition, following their support for the same political front they have attempted to prop up for the last nearly 2 years. Coalition is Smoke Screen for state Sponsorship of Terrorism. Beginning at least as early as 2007, the West and its allies, primarily the US, Israel and Saudi Arabia, began quietly organizing, funding, and arming a regional front of sectarian extremists across the Arab World to be used against Lebanon, Syria, and Iran. Exposed in Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Seymour Hershs The Redirection, published that same year in the New Yorker, it was revealed that many of these sectarian extremists were in fact affiliated directly with Al Qaeda. In essence, the West would be intentionally and knowingly funding the very adversaries Western troops had just spent the better part of a decade allegedly fighting in Afghanistan, Iraq, and upon lesser known battlefields in Somalia, Pakistan, and Yemen, as part of the War on Terror. From the very beginning of the so-called Arab Spring, armed elements were active in Syria actively seeking to widen what was the final execution of 2007s plans to undermine and overthrow first Syria, then Lebanon and finally Iran. The so-called Syrian National Council (SNC), as well as street protests and online activism served as but a smokescreen for what was in reality an invasion of Syria by Western armed and backed foreign extremists sent to augment Muslim Brotherhood militants prevalent in the Dara, Idlib, and Dayr Al-Zawr regions of Syria also coincidentally the cradles of the current so-called revolution. The influx of foreign fighters spiked after NATO had finally succeeded in 2011 at overthrowing the government of Libya and placing into power militants from the eastern city of Benghazi. It was from Benghazi that an overwhelming proportion of Al Qaeda fighters had be sent to fight in Iraq during the US occupation. Like in Syria, the cradle for the so-called Libyan revolution was also coincidentally the epicenter for extremist activity. In Libyas case, Benghazi served as the center for the the US State Department, United Nations, and the UK Home Office (page 5, .pdf)-listed terror organization, the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG). This was documented extensively in the West Point Combating Terrorism Center reports, Al-Qaidas Foreign Fighters in Iraq and Bombers, Bank Accounts and Bleedout: al-Qaidas Road In and Out of Iraq. Both reports exposed Libya as a global epicenter for Al Qaeda training and recruitment, producing more fighters per capita than even Saudi Arabia, and producing more foreign fighters numerically than any other nation that sent militants to Iraq, except Saudi Arabia itself. Image: Libya, despite its relatively small population, came in second overall, producing foreign fighters to wage sectarian war in Iraq. Libya exceeded all other nations per capita in producing foreign fighters, including Al Qaedas primary patrons, Saudi Arabia. These diagrams were produced by West Points Combating Terrorism Center, on pages 8 and 9 of its Al-Qaidas Foreign Fighters in Iraq report. The reports specifically identify eastern Libya (Cyrenaica) as terrorist hotbeds, precisely where the so-called 2011 pro-democracy revolution also began, and where most of Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafis attention had been focused over the course of at least three decades, fighting militant extremists. The cities of Darnah, Tobruk, and Benghazi in particular fielded the vast majority of foreign fighters sent to Iraq and also served as the very epicenter for the 2011 violent, NATO-backed uprising. Clearly, the US military and the US government were both well aware of the heavy Al Qaeda presence in eastern Libya since as early as 2007. When violence flared up in 2011, it was clear to many geopolitical analysts that it was the result of Al Qaeda, not pro-democracy protesters. The US government, its allies, and a the Western press willfully lied to the public, misrepresented its case to the United Nations and intervened in Libya on behalf of international terrorists, overthrowing a sovereign government, and granting an entire nation as a base of operations for the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG). A similar scenario is now playing out in Syria, where the West, despite acknowledging the existence of Al Qaeda in Benghazi, Libya, is using these militants, and the exact same networks used to send fighters to Iraq, to flood into and overrun Syria. This, after these very same Libyan militants were implicated in an attack that left a US ambassador dead on September 11, 2012. LIFG terrorists are documented to be flooding into Syria from Libya. In November 2011, the Telegraph in their article, Leading Libyan Islamist met Free Syrian Army opposition group, would report: Another Telegraph article, Libyas new rulers offer weapons to Syrian rebels, would admit Later that month, some 600 Libyan terrorists would be reported to have entered Syria to begin combat operations and have been flooding into the country ever since. Image: (Left) West Points Combating Terrorism Centers 2007 report, Al-Qaidas Foreign Fighters in Iraq also indicated which areas in Syria Al Qaeda fighters filtering into Iraq came from. The overwhelming majority of them came from Dayr Al-Zawr in Syrias southeast, Idlib in the north near the Turkish-Syrian border, and Dara in the south near the Jordanian-Syrian border. (Right) A map indicating the epicenters of violence in Syria indicate that the exact same hotbeds for Al Qaeda in 2007, now serve as the epicenters of so-called pro-democracy fighters. In Syria, the southeastern region near Dayr Al-Zawr on the Iraqi-Syrian border, the northwestern region of Idlib near the Turkish-Syrian border, and Dara in the south near the Jordanian-Syrian border, produced the majority of fighters found crossing over into Iraq, according to the 2007 West Point study. These regions now serve as the epicenter for a similar Libyan-style uprising, with fighters disingenuously portrayed as pro-democracy freedom fighters. These are also the locations receiving the majority of foreign fighters flowing in from other areas described in the 2007 report, mainly from Saudi Arabia via Jordan, and from Libya, either directly, through Turkey, or through Egypt and/or Jordan. The CIA is confirmed to be operating in these areas, allegedly to help keep weapons out of the hands of fighters allied with Al Qaeda or other terrorist groups, according to the New York Times in their article, C.I.A. Said to Aid in Steering Arms to Syrian Opposition. Even as the West postures as if only now weapons will begin flowing to the new opposition coalition, militants in Syria have been receiving Western backing, funding, and arms through a variety of networks, years before the so-called Arab Spring had even begun, and certainly well before this current juncture in the conflict. However thus far, clearly to no avail. The West, primarily the US, UK, and France, its NATO ally Turkey, and the Persian Gulf monarchies of Saudi Arabia and Qatar, are intentionally assisting known terrorists in the overthrow of the sovereign, secular government of Syria a repeat of the now clearly failed, and already backfiring NATO intervention in Libya. In fact, the exact same terrorists the US claims it is hunting in the deserts of Libya for having killed its ambassador, now stand poised in Syria to receive expanded political recognition and military support from the West after this latest round of window dressing in Doha, Qatar. International support has waned significantly for the West and its narrative. The tepid support the West garnered for its military operations in Libya seem now a long-lost luxury. The SNC itself is politically, tactically, socially, culturally, and above all ideologically disconnected with both the fighters in Syria, as well as any legitimate opposition that may exist. While the SNC consists of Syrians, many of the fighters in Syria are in fact foreign militants who hold an allegiance to Saudi Wahhabism, opposed by even many of the current Syrian governments critics critics who also denounce the SNC and their calls for foreign intervention. In coordination with this political charade, Israel and Turkey have been pressing the borders of Syria. Turkey, led by the government of Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoan, has allowed its territory along the border with Syria to be used as a sanctuary and staging ground for foreign terrorists entering into and fighting against the government and people of Syria. Israel has recently been firing at Syrian forces conducting security operations against militants in the Golan Heights. The two-pronged encroachment by Turkey and Israel is not the spontaneous response by both nations to an escalating conflict on the ground. Rather it was prescribed, verbatim, by corporate-financier funded policy think-tank, the Brookings Institution, in their report, Assessing Options for Regime Change as a means of increasing psychological pressure on Syria. The report states specifically: The prospect of foreign military intervention, or NATOs already depleted terrorist forces succeeding even with increased weapon shipments from the West, is still unlikely. As Brookings indicates, much of what is being done is aimed at psychologically undermining the stalwart defense thus far put up by the Syrian government and its people. The fear of possible military intervention and/or the increase in terrorist capabilities is meant to splinter the Syrian populations overwhelming support and unity against what is now clearly foreign aggression, not rebellion. Likewise, the seemingly unstoppable advance of Western aggression against Syria is meant to undermine the support of Syrias allies. Western aggression however has already reached its limits and while it could embark upon a wider military confrontation with Syria, should both the Syrian people and Syrias allies remain committed to the defense of the nations sovereignty, not only will this aggression fail, it will create momentum that will roll the West and its extraterritorial interests back significantly, if not entirely. Unity is still Syrias only option. Tony Cartaluccis articles have appeared on many alternative media websites, including his own at Land Destroyer Report. Read other contributed articles by Tony Cartalucci here. 