Top Climate Researcher Urges Nuclear Power to Thwart GeoengineeringGeoengineering vs. nuclear power is like watching two grim reapers playing chess. It is becoming increasingly difficult to write off geoengineering as conspiracy. We already have numerous White Papers from think tanks, official documents admitting to climate control plans, and many public admissions from scientists and politicians alike. This week geoengineering has been launched further into the mainstream. First we sawRiley Duren, a Chief Systems Engineer at NASAs Jet Propulsion Labs, caution against rogue geoengineers and mad scientistsusing climate control as a potential weapon. Curiously this is the exact same concern that was expressed bygeoengineerings leading proponent, Harvard climate scientist, David Keith. Keith likened geoengineering to nuclear weapons and the subsequent race to acquire that technology. These concerns are centered around structuring the proper international governance to ensure that geoengineering is carried out correctly. Ironically enough, after the parallel drawn between the power of weather modification to the power of nuclear weapons, one of the foremost climate researchers is also confirming the reality of geoengineering, while reinforcing the rogue geoengineer meme; but he is suggesting that nuclear power is the solution to the inevitable need for geoengineering. We are seeing an emerging spin being put to geoengineering that is preparing it for mass media rollout. This new meme is that we have a developing race among nations and individuals to solve the urgent global climate problem. In so doing, it is a de facto way for the establishment to claim victory in the debate over whether or not there is even a problem to be solved. Instead, we are directed toward the inevitability of a threatening climate, with an additional spin to the story that weather modification is only in its conceptual phase and no one has any idea who will be in charge of such initiatives when they are fully introduced, so we need global governance to handle these issues. The politicizing of the climate is an interesting one to observe, as it is instructive to see which powers are attempting to get to the forefront. We of course had Al Gore and his banking buddies carbon tax schemes; we have international bodies indicating that they are prepared to usurp states and nations for the greater good and global security; and as youll see below we also have the nuclear industry using climate change to push their own agenda. The following excerpt from aBulletin of Atomic Scientistspress release takes the approach that geonengineering is an extreme measure, and is one that does have major consequences, but that through nuclear energy we may be able to avert the programs being discussed. The language is interesting, as it shows both that geongineering is already widely discussed among scientists (though clearly still thought of as tin-foil hat material by the corporate media), as well as an assertion that there could be enormous unforeseen consequences if such climate-saving measures are employed. To illustrate the intellectual conflict within such science the official bio of The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists spells it out quite clearly: Yes, this eminent group was spawned from its own threat to civilization very comforting to know where the solutions are coming from. In the wake of Fukushima and the otherapparently unforeseen consequences of that event, and the impact of many others, geoengineering vs. nuclear power is like watching two grim reapers playing chess. The fact that geoengineering is emerging into the open indicates that the threat level has increased. When we look at the possibilities, we must see only two: geoengineering either has been hidden for nefarious purposes, or these experts are completely delusional both possibilities are grave threats to humanity. Lets take this new openness by the establishment as an opportunity to engage the newly aware and offer the history behind both of these solutions as nothing more than an ongoing potential extinction-level event. Lets begin seeking true open-source energy solutions, as well as free up research into currently fringe ideas such as free energy and the wonders of new materials such as grapheneor the Navys method to turn seawater into clean fuel. These solutions will go beyond the divide-and-conquer strategies of climate science and get to the heart of the matter: low-cost, safe, clean energy solutions that equally benefit humans, nature, and the planet. Geoengineering (chemtrails): for background please consider the following sources Sites: Nuclear Power There are few better sources discussing the threat of nuclear power than Dr. Richard Wilcox who resides in Tokyo and has been documenting what he sees on the ground politically and physically as a result of the Fukushima meltdown. His body of work can be found at Rense.com and earlier articles are archived on his own sitehere. Please feel free to add your own sources to the comment section below. Source: Related: Recently by Kevin Samson: 