FDA Is Killing Our Freedoms and Destroying Our HealthBy Aaron Dykes As such, I felt the need to respond to Jon Rappoports article, A Message to Libertarians About the FDA, because it is an issue I have also thought about quite often. Is it in the interest of a free society who desires limited government and maximum rights to have a tough watchdog who can protect people? After all, even the average citizen is likely familiar with the deadly mistakes and misdeeds of the food and drug industries. People dont want dangerous pharmaceuticals being prescribed to them because proper testing wasnt done; people dont want their food contaminated with salmonella or e. Coli; many people dont want GMOs to be allowed at all, and damn sure want a label on food packages in order to know which foods contain them. But if these are duties of the Food and Drug Administration, then the federal agency has failed over and over and over again, all while protecting those whove done wrong and enabling them to do bigger and better business. The details are part of a long and ongoing saga; but for starters, the overlapping relationships between the FDA and Big Pharma industry look something like this: So what can be done about it? What is the solution to the dilemma? As it turns out, protecting individual liberty should be the first priorityuntil those rights are respected, the problem can never improve. Jon Rappoport writes regularly with great points, and is a dependable staple of good commentary on this crazy, screwed up world. But, here, he cuts right to the chase on an important question: given that the criminals are in charge, that the fox guards the henhouse, and that the powers-that-be are fine with foxes eating chickens, how can we stop it? Regulate it? Protect against it? In a half-sane society, the big drug companies would have been prosecuted to the sky long ago. Their charters to do business in any state would have been revoked. Their CEOs, executives, and scientists would have been put behind bars for life. Even a limited federal government would have done that. Here is where Im in accord with Libertarians: people have right and the freedom to refuse medication, under any circumstances, even where the experts claim death will be the inevitable outcome. And people have the right to ingest any compounds they decide might help them. If that were the basis for the system, then government couldnt overwhelm the population with rules about mandatory vaccines (see also) and drugs. The extreme libertarian argument for no government regulation (via the FDA) isnt going to happen, even if it would be better; neither can the FDA be reformed to do their job (better or at all) in protecting the people from dangerous drugs and treatments from Big Pharma. Sad, but true. Utterly and unshakably true. It would be nice if Big Pharmas power were checked, and problems stopped before they can do harm. It would be oh-so-nice if the FDA truly looked out for the benefit of people, instead of helping the food and drug industries to become more powerful. But it just isnt going to happen. Truly regrettable. But sorry, it just isnt going to happen. Not only is it not realistic it may be inherently impossible to accomplish. More and more government including an Obamacare universal health system and more regulation (look how well the EPA is doing lately) is only compounding these problems and making the corruption and loss of freedom worse. (And no one is getting healthier in the meantime.) In case you hadnt noticed, all national health insurance plans, in whatever countries theyve been established, are the road to perdition, because they can be manipulated to coerce citizens into accepting designated toxic medical treatments. The freedom of refusal is the only protection when crime bosses rule both government agencies (like the FDA) and pharmaceutical companies. Trying to reform Pharma or the government is a losing proposition. Maintaining the right to refuse is the most important freedom with respect to medical health. It is the foundation and most important fundamental step. Any free society of the future, no matter how it chooses to embrace technology and facilitate huge areas and masses of people, must at its core respect the basic freedoms of individuals. Any free society of the future must begin with the Bill of Rights and recognize medical freedom as part of those essential rights (under a proper interpretation of the spirit of these rights, medical freedom is included, but unfortunately not explicitly cited). Medical freedom means the right to choose what you will put into your body, and the right NOT to be forced to take drugs or medicine even if other people believe it will save lives. Mandatory vaccines for school children, forced chemotherapy treatments for independent teenagers and Amish children against the will of the child and/or parents is absolutely wrong, and only heralds the arrival of greater tyranny against all of our health rights. Dr. Benjamin Rush, an influential but lesser known founding father and medical doctor, saw this issue clearly as well. Rush, who corresponded with President George Washington and many other founders of the day, wrote letters warning that medical freedom must be protected under the Constitutionor else, tyranny is basically inevitable. He said: Unless we put medical freedom into the Constitution, the time will come when medicine will organize into an undercover dictatorship to restrict the art of healing to one class of Men and deny equal privileges to others; the Constitution of the Republic should make a Special privilege for medical freedoms as well as religious freedom. This sentiment is of paramount importance, and desperately needs to be revisited. Forcing down the medicine is obviously not the sign of a healthy and free society. And the medical right to refuse is an individual nullification that can deliver a powerful blow to corrupt power by the system. Also See: The Top 10 Most Dangerous Government Agencies Image Credit Aaron Dykes is a co-founder of TruthstreamMedia.com. As a writer, researcher and video producer who has worked on numerous documentaries and investigative reports, he uses history as a guide to decode current events, uncover obscure agendas and contrast them with the dignity afforded individuals as recognized in documents like the Bill of Rights. Excellent article thanks! Thank you Aaron for your meaningful contribution to this essential conversation which we must continue. I would like readers to consider some additional points from your Sovereign Grandmother. You correctly identify the fundamental Human Right to Refuse Medical Treatment. But lets not skip over the most important precursor Right To Informed Consent. David Knight at Infowars has been educating the public on our need to increase our awareness and fact-based knowledge, rather than to blindly accept so-called authority figures and for-profit propaganda disguised as science. My point here is that most adults alive in America today are factually-documented to be illiterate in even the Natural Sciences, and in addition, we have been been dumbed-down intellectually by our widespread biological contamination of mind-altering substances in our water, food, and pharmaceuticals lifestyle. This causes FUNCTIONAL INTELLECTUAL INCAPACITY which is the basis for our inability to Discern Reality and constructively deal with problems which could save us all. The precursor skill I am suggesting needs developing, is that of demanding our Right To Informed Consent, i.e., PROOF of the efficacy AND safety of ANY medical treatment before we decide if we will or will refuse. The reason America is in the current sinkhole of ongoing confiscation of our Civil Rights is because to exercise our Right To Informed Consent requires a level of Independent Thinking which increasingly fewer Americans possess. To simply jump over this necessary requirement in self-development, and to automatically Refuse medical treatments, would be a bad mistake. We need to make Informed decisions, not knee-jerk choices based on superficial notions which we have not personally vetted. The reason why this is a ticking time bomb which is not going away, is because we can see what is ahead. While many of us older Americans are trying desperately to get younger Americans to wake up about their bio-accumulated chemical contamination, geo-engineering and radiation damage, and the ongoing extermination-by-pharmaceuticals, the Mandatory Vaccines program has already begun and we are now, AS WE SPEAK, being set up for Mandatory Pharmaceuticals (probably Universal Statins beginning in childhood). Next to Chemotherapeutic agents, Statins may be the most dangerous (and profitable) class of pharmaceuticals. In case you did not notice, in the last week or so, multiple articles have been released into mainstream media which position the government to begin Mandatory Statins based on false data, bogus science, for-profit propaganda, and long-ago promised PAYBACK to the Big Pharma RD which invested in successful elections. If you follow the money and think in terms of decades not years, you can see how RD of Pharmaceuticals and Weapons float elections, the derivatives market, social control agenda of the Globalists, and what little industry is happening in America. Well done, spot on, absolutely irrefutable. At least by the sane and logical and liberty minded. Even the most MINIMAL liberty minded. Only the completely, hopelessly brainwashed or the agents of big FDArma could find any fault here. Big FDArma. I just made that up. I kinda like it. Whatcha think? this is a very scary thought.. another great and succinct article Jon. The fda is another tool of the fools that dictate to the common folk. Im sure if no regs existed then folks would certainly want to shop locally and know who they are buying from. most excellent article! Thanks 