US Never Intended to Defeat ISISTony Cartalucci According to Western security agencies, in addition to ISIS regional campaign of brutality stretching from Lebanon, across Syria, and into Iraq, it is also working ceaselessly to carry out attacks against targets within the US, across Europe, and even in the Pacific. US Policymakers Claim ISIS is Neither a Threat Nor Necessary to Defeat Considering the hysteria generated by ISIS alleged global exploits, it should then be infinitely curious to readers who happen across US policymakers claiming that ISIS may pose a threat, but constitutes by far a lesser threat than Iran or Syria the two principle nations leading the real fight against ISIS and its international sponsors. Furthermore, US policymakers claim there is no urgency to defeat ISIS, and it should instead be contained. Of course, this containment will be within states targeted by US-backed regime change serving as a convenient agent of destruction, destabilization, and perhaps even regime change itself. There are other hard questions for even bigger threats in the Middle East, such as how to ensure a nuclear free Iran and how to deal with the Assad regime in Syria. For ISIS, though, we may have it right.More troubling still, such policymakers hail from the US-based Brookings Institution, a prominent corporate-financier funded policy think-tank that has helped direct American foreign policy for decades. Brookings Federal Executive Fellow Robert Hein, a career US Navy officer, has presented analysis under an article titled, The Big Questions on ISIS. After diminishing the threat ISIS actually poses to the US and suggesting that the battle against the terrorist organization will be perpetual. It would have been interesting if Hein did qualify that final statement explaining how an extraterritorial terrorist army armed and funded by some of the largest, most influential nation-states on Earth, currently ravaging three nations while allegedly plotting against the rest of the planet is somehow a lesser threat than Iran and Syria both of which have not threatened the United States, and in fact, according to the Brookings Institution itself, have expressed a specific desire to avoid a confrontation with the West. ISIS is a Lesser Threat But a Lesser Threat to Whom? As bizarre as Heins analysis may seem, it strikes at a troubling but undeniable truth. If by US Hein meant the American people, Americas service members, and victims of various staged attacks aimed at justifying foreign wars, then ISIS is a threat. For the many millions living in the Middle East or North Africa, ISIS is undoubtedly a threat. For corporate-financiers on Wall Street, the many corrupt politicians in Wall Streets pocket in Washington, or corporate-financier funded policymakers like Hein himself, ISIS is not only not a threat, but an indispensable asset. As such, prioritizing ISIS destruction is not part of Wall Street or Washingtons agenda rather perpetuating this threat for as long as possible is. Hein is unabashed about this notion, claiming: Heins strategy also works exceedingly well if ISIS was intentionally created as a proxy mercenary force, deployed by the West against its enemies. Such a notion, while dismissed out of hand by many as a conspiracy theory is not only plausible, but in fact a documented fact. The use of terrorists and sectarian extremists is a reoccurring feature in Western foreign policy including its most notorious use in the mountains of Afghanistan in the 1980s where the US created Al Qaeda to begin with. As recently as 2007, Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Seymour Hersh documented a conspiracy to once again use sectarian extremists aligned with Al Qaeda to target, undermine, and overthrow the government of Syria and wage a proxy war against Iran. His report titled, The Redirection: Is the Administrations new policy benefiting our enemies in the war on terrorism? stated (emphasis added): It would be difficult to read Hershs 2007 report and attempt to deny that is not precisely what has unfolded, verbatim, beginning under the cover of the US-engineered Arab Spring up to and including the creation of ISIS and its growing fighting capabilities possible only through an immense, coordinated multinational effort. The creation of ISIS and what appears to be concerted attempts to justify the slow burn prescribed to stop it are echoed in Heins proposal of not stopping ISIS to stop it. Why Syria and Iran are Bigger Threats Ironically, it was an extensive policy paper produced by the very think tank Hein belongs to Brookings Institution that noted Iran (and therefore Syria) not only did not want war with the West, but was willing to weather endless covert provocations to avoid giving the West an excuse to wage hegemonic war against the nations. Within the pages of Brookings Which Path to Persia? report published in 2009, it was stated: The report would also state: The entire report is a documented conspiracy to justify and provoke war with a nation actively seeking to avoid war even at the cost of suffering innumerable humiliations, covert attacks, assassinations, decades-spanning sanctions, and other forms of terroristic provocations. When Hein and other US policymakers refer to Iran and Syria as a greater threat than ISIS, they do not mean a threat to the national security of the American people or the territory of the United States itself but rather a threat to their own hegemonic interests well beyond Americas borders and even interests that lie within the borders of Iran and Syria themselves. Deciphering the deceptive, criminal language used by US policymakers illuminates the ongoing conspiracy in which ISIS plays a central part. ISIS is considered not a threat not because the US can manage what they claim is an inherently anti-Western terrorist organization but rather because the US itself created and controls it. Syria and Iran, while not actual threats to the West, are considered instead threats to US interests more specifically the interests of the corporate-financier elite on Wall Street and their lobbyists in Washington D.C. Tony Cartalucci, Bangkok-based geopolitical researcher and writer, especially for the online magazine New Eastern Outlook, where this first appeared. 