An Inconvenient Bilderberg TruthAndrew Puhanic, Contributor The corporate whore mainstream media (yes thats exactly who they are and I dont apologise for using such harsh language) has purposefully not made any mention of the upcoming Bilderberg Group meeting and has in fact deliberately begun a systematic attack on the alternative media and Bilderberg truthers for their efforts to report on the Bilderberg Group meeting and its agenda. Its unbelievable and difficult to comprehend why the corporate media has been so blatant in its lack of coverage of the Bilderberg Group meetings. Think about it, every year there is an event where most of the top globalists, politicians, bankers and corporate industrialists congregate to actively plan and strategize global political, economic and environmental programs behind everyones back, in secret and without any accountability, yet the mainstream media thinks its not worthy of reporting? To demonstrate how little coverage there has been of the Bilderberg Group meetings, a simple Google news search for Bilderberg Group revealed only 652 results (most of which arent news items about the Bilderberg Group, but rather keywords found from comments), Bing News produced 23 results and Yahoo News delivered 13 results. So lets think about the reporting results of Google, Bing and Yahoo logically. The top globalists, politicians and business leaders congregate to meet secretly to discuss political, economic and environmental programs, of which the outcomes affect everyone, yet the top 3 search engines could only find 688 results globally? In comparison to the 1,310,000 results for one direction in Google News, I think its pretty obvious that there is in effect a blackout of Bilderberg Group reporting. To even further demonstrate the Bilderberg blackout, Reuters News only published 10 articles about the Bilderberg Group, with the last one being in December 2011. They were quoted as saying: For conspiracy theorists, the conference, staged by the search engine giant, is a cuddlier version of the Bilderberg Group, the supposedly shadowy network of financiers that holds a private annual assembly, recast in the image of our new tech masters Fareed Zakaria from CNN, another globalist and Bilderberg-backed institution, also publicized a story about the Bilderberg Group describing them as a conference like dozens of others around the world. Zakaria then went on to say: the idea that a finance minister or a banker would say something with a group of 150 people that is any different than what he would say in public is crazy in todays world where everything leaks instantly. I think its fair to suggest that Zakarias second statement is just ignorant. Does Zakaria actually believe the Bilderbergers sit there and talk about matters already discussed in the public domain? If this was the case, then why doesnt the Bilderberg Group publicise its meeting minutes? Or even better, why dont they invite the alternative media to report on the events of the conference? Also more recently, Kenneth Vogel from Politico wrote an article highlighting the emerging trends in the alternative media around reporting of the Bilderberg Group. The essence of his article highlights the lack of urgency and willingness of the mainstream media to hold to account the dealings and agenda of the Bilderberg Group. Not once during Vogels article does he truly question the motive of the Bilderberg Group. Vogels article clearly demonstrates the lack of interest the mainstream media has for the Bilderberg Group and its agenda. I think its time, and I believe you would agree, that we all stop referring to the Bilderberg Group as some sort of conspiracy theory, but rather as a real institution who as a collective has a capacity to deliver programs and change on a global scale. The inherent capacity of the Bilderberg Group to make such decisions is undesirable and is a threat to the stability and future of the world. So where else does the 1% who control the 99% congregate in secrecy and why does the corporate media avoid them like the plague? I think the latter part of the question needs to be explored further and only the alternative media has the guts to do so. Until the hand that feeds the dog is eliminated, the main stream media will never change. linkwithin_text=Related Articles: 