I Review a Mind-Control Review of VAXXEDBy Jon Rappoport My analysis of how a conformist film critic operates, starting with the basics, which of course involve mind control. Where did the word official come from? Mainstream media is all about what the audience wants to hold on to. The audience wants stability. When you boil it down, this means they want something official. Stable=official. The actual substance of the news dries up like rain on the street after the sun comes out again. Gone. Doesnt matter. As long as the audience feels theyve received the Official Word. Official=a slave signaling admiration for his master. Its the Stockholm syndrome writ large. Lets go to the scorecard: the two Latin roots of the word official. Opus (work), and facere (to do or make). To do work. Seems rather harmless. But somewhere along the line it was inflatedfor instance, holding office; he held an office in the government. And, as often happens, when the Latin moves forward into the medieval period, when the Church takes hold, the concept is made gaseous. In this case, to do work becomes divine service. Yes. As in the divine right of kings to rule, to make laws, to call the shots, to issue orders. Official looms large. Lets say I run a major media outlet. It would be in my interest to make distinctions between official and meritless. Who wants meritless or conspiratorial or dissenting or odd or weird or in-the-minority? Those categories are worthless, and pointing this out bolsters my superior status and position. I am reliable. They are not. Thats how I play the game. Ive talked to many mainstream reporters over the years. They know almost nothing important about what theyre reporting on. Some of them have high IQs, but theyre dumb as wood when it comes to the content and nature of the issues they convey to the public. And this is on purpose. There is no reason to have acute and deep knowledge. It doesnt fit the format. Their work involves looking and sounding convincing, which is a different kind of job. Its actually a hindrance to know too much. It gets in the way. Their job is to come across as official. For instance, in a review of the just-released film, Vaxxed (trailer)and Im not going to dignify the reporter by mentioning him or his outletthe Gibbering Fantasist (reviewer) states that the director of the film, Andrew Wakefield, is a doctor who had his license stripped in England. In other words, Wakefield is unofficial. It doesnt matter why his license was taken away, or whether some grave injustice was committed in that regard. Dont bother looking into that mess. Its enough to say the source of the film wasnt official. The Fantasist (reviewer) also mentions that the subject of the film, William Thompson, a CDC whistleblower who confesses to extreme scientific fraud, who gave the MMR vaccine a free pass and concealed its connection to autism, is not seen walking and talking and sitting in the film. The audience only hears his voice. Thompson is therefore unofficial. No mention is made of the fact that Thompson, since his 2014 confession in writing, refuses to be interviewed by the press. Thats irrelevant. (And do I need to point out that radio news is audio onlywith no faces?) The reviewer further states that the audio clips of whistleblower Thompson in the film were recorded during telephone callswithout Thompsons permission. By implication, this is supposed to mean that Thompsons revealing audio confessions are also unofficial. Of course, many news stories have come from recorded phone callsbut in this case, theyre suddenly not admissible. The reviewer mentions that the producer of Vaxxed, Del Bigtree, speaks in the film. Since that is purportedly unusual, its unofficial. It can be discounted and ignored. Whats left? Not much. The film is not credible because its not official. Why didnt the reviewer just come out and say that? He could have written a one-sentence article. He could have called the CDC, which is exposed in the film, and asked for a statement. An official one, of course. He could simply have exclaimed the Official Word on vaccines: Theyre all safe and effective! Thats all you need to know! And then headed out for a drink. Or he could have written this: Im giving you the official word on an unofficial film. The film has no status in the mainstream. Dont bother seeing it. Itll fill your head with unofficial thoughts, and you wont know what to do with them. Thats what unofficial material does. It leaves you in the lurch. My job is to remind you where your mind should live, which is where everyone elses lives. Thats where you want to be. If you think you can be anywhere else, youre on the verge of going delusional, and thats dangerously dangerous. Indeed. The Fantasist Reviewer manages to avoid mentioning that the whistleblower, William Thompson, a long-time CDC researcher, did an astonishing thing by coming out of the heavily guarded scientific closet and confessing to fraud on a scale that is staggering: He and his colleagues permitted a highly dangerous and destructive vaccine to remain in use. But why should the Fantasist mention it? Thompson committed an unofficial act. He committed it in arena where only the good and true and humane and dedicated and brilliant and competent and caring and dutiful and self-sacrificing and life-affirming medical authorities are supposed to rule. Thompson stuck a knife in the heart of all that. And Officialdom must not acknowledge it, on pain of death. Therefore, it doesnt acknowledge it. No. Instead, news operates this way, to paraphrase Orwell: Tonight, on a street corner, a citizen accosted a news reporter. The following exchange took place. Roll the video. Citizen: 2 and 2 equal 4. Reporter: No. They equal 5. Citizen: Why? Reporter: Its official. Citizen: Oh. I see. Reporter: No you dont. But it doesnt matter. (To read about Jons mega-collection, Exit From The Matrix, click here.) Image: Vaxxed.com The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here. I wonder if Jon read the same article I read in the Hollywood Reporter on Saturday. In the very first paragraph, the reviewer mentioned that he had not seen the movie but that someone he knows had seen it and that was good enough for him. The writer panned the movie because 1.) Wakefield is a fraud 2.) Thompson is never seen on screen 3.) too much anti-vax conspiracy stuff 4.) only 20 people, all anti-vaxers, showed up besides the press. The rest of the review was a Cliff Notes version of the vaccine debate from the official point of view. I posted a comment responding to a particularly ignorant comment, then went on my way. Today, I found a video report of the opening night.there were many hundreds of people at the showing. Wakefield received an ovation at the end. Hmmmm.the Hollywood Reporter got things very wrong. So I went back to the Hollywood Reporter article to make another comment and.lo and behold!the article was a mere fraction of its previous length. Scrubbed and neutered, it barely registered as a review at all. My comment was still there, so I know it was the same article, but where did the rest of it go? The dishonesty of the press is palpable. Excellent comment. We dont really have a press anymore. The TV reporters are script-reading robots with plastic hair-dos hiding the empty area where their brains are supposed to be. There are a few videos on You-Tube that gather local news anchors from all over the US reading the same exact script on the same exact day, usually involving some kind of inane holiday message. Their blank robot expressions really irk me. That people actually listen and believe them is horrifying. Best marijuana plug in USA contact for more info on 512 640 9206 or visit our website and place your order directly : 420cannabisplug dot com I have to agree, I have searched and searched there is not one or barely one honest report there. You keep hearing about Wakefields supposed fraud. I had a quick squiz over his study, and from what i understand the measles virus in the guts of autistic kids in relation to a new form of colitis should really be the main focus of Wakefields work, not Brain Deers semantics BS. To be honest, they arent even to me an problem, because I consder the entrie vaccine ind. to be an massive scam, based upon corruption and a science witch is basicly untrusthwurthy, since they alow frauds of this magnitute come thrue. Otherwise have an nice day, and this nails it clearly, and this isnt new, this is their modus of oprandi since Guttenbergs times, where historical forgerys began with the first book printed and since then they have lied about everything. peace Oh my God so happy i found the right plug to get my treatment . 420 cannabis plug is my savior now im back in life . hey guys if you wanna be like me visit 420cannabisplug .com Discreet , fast and secured shipment worldwide . We are suppliers of buds , cannabis oil for sick ones . contact us via text on 512 640 9206 or visit our website : 420cannabisplug dot com 