Is The Global-Warming Hustle Finally Falling Apart?By Jon Rappoport When you see a problem defined as a threat to all humans, you can be sure Globalists are using that fake or real problem to impose control on all humans. (The Underground. Jon Rappoport) With the election of Donald Trump, climate change and global warming have come back into the spotlight. In a different way. The science is settled isnt good enough now. Neither is the Globalist plan to cut energy production in every country in the world, in order to rescue us from frying. LA Times: Donald Trump will be about the only head of state who does not believe in climate science or the responsibility of his government to act, said Michael Brune, executive director of the Sierra Club But all along, there have been dissenters from the manmade warming mantra; they just havent been allowed inside government portals. Freeman Dyson, physicist and mathematician, professor emeritus at Princetons Institute for Advanced Study, Fellow of the Royal Society, winner of the Lorentz Medal, the Max Planck Medal, the Fermi Award: What has happened in the past 10 years is that the discrepancies [in climate change models] between whats observed and whats predicted have become much stronger. Its clear now the models are wrong, but it wasnt so clear 10 years ago Im 100 per cent Democrat myself, and I like Obama. But he took the wrong side on this [climate change] issue, and the Republicans took the right side (The Register, October 11, 2015) Dr. Ivar Giaever, Nobel-prize winner in Physics (1973), reported by Climate Depot, July 8, 2015: Global warming is a non-problemI say this to Obama: Excuse me, Mr. President, but youre wrong. Dead wrong. Green Guru James Lovelock, who once predicted imminent destruction of the planet via global warming: The computer models just werent reliable. In fact, Im not sure the whole thing isnt crazy, this climate change. (The Guardian, September 30, 2016) And these are but a tiny fraction of the statements made by dissident scientists who reject manmade global warming. The science is only settled in government circles where leaders have climbed on board the Globalist plan to undermine economies all over the world by grossly lowering energy production, as a way to reduce warming. One of the major warming hustlers is, of course, Al Gore. Consider facts laid out in an uncritical Washington Post story (October 10, 2012, Al Gore has thrived as a green-tech investor): In 2001, Al was worth less than $2 million. By 2012, it was estimated hed locked up a nice neat $100 million. How did he do it? Well, he invested in 14 green companies, who inhaled via loans, grants and tax relief somewhere in the neighborhood of $2.5 billion from the Federal government to go greener. Therefore, Gores investments paid off, because the Federal government was providing massive cash backup to those companies. Its nice to have Federal friends in high places. For example, Gores investment firm at one point held 4.2 million shares of an outfit called Iberdrola Renovables, which was building 20 wind farms across the United States. Iberdrola was blessed with $1.5 billion from the Federal government for the work which, by its own admission, saved its corporate financial bacon. Every little bit helps. Then there was a company called Johnson Controls. It made batteries, including those for electric cars. Gores investment company, Generation Investment Management (GIM), doubled its holdings in Johnson Controls in 2008, when shares cost as little $9 a share. GIM sold when shares cost $21 to $26 before the market for electric-car batteries fell on its head. For a while, the going was good. To make it go good, Johnson Controls had been bolstered by $299 million dropped at its doorstep by the administration of President Barack Obama. On the side, Gore had been giving speeches on the end of life as we know it on planet Earth, for as much as $175,000 a pop. (It isnt really on the side. Gore was constantly on the move from conference to conference, spewing jet fumes in his wake.) Those lecture fees can add up. So Gore, as of 2012, had $100 million. The man has worked every angle to parlay fear of global-warming catastrophes into a humdinger of a personal fortune. And he didnt achieve his new status in the free market. The Federal government has been helping out with major, major bucks. This wasnt an entrepreneur relying exclusively on his own smarts and hard work. Far from it. How many scientists and other PhDs have been just saying no to the theory of manmade global warming? A letter to The Wall Street Journal signed by 16 scientists just said no. Among the luminaries: William Happer, professor of physics at Princeton University; Richard Lindzen, professor of atmospheric sciences at Massachusetts Institute of Technology; William Kininmonth, former head of climate research at the Australian Bureau of Meteorology. And then there was the Global Warming Petition Project, or the Oregon Petition, that just said no. According to Petitionproject.org, the petition has the signatures of 31,487 American scientists, of which 9,029 stated they had Ph.D.s. Global warming is one of the Rockefeller Globalists chief issues. Manipulating it entails convincing populations that a massive intervention is necessary to stave off the imminent collapse of all life on Earth. Therefore, sovereign nations must be eradicated. Political power and decision-making must flow from above, from those who are wiser. Al Gore is one of their front men. He jets here and he jets there, carrying their messages. Hes their delivery kid. And for his work, he is paid $100 million a drop in the bucket. A final note about the science of global warming A hypothesis is a provisional statement that remains to be confirmed through experiments. Confirmation means making a correct prediction. Not just any prediction, but a useful one. Take this hypothesis: The Earth has become warmer by X degrees over the past 1000 years. Putting all the chatter aside, have scientists deployed this hypothesis to make accurate, specific, and useful predictions about warming? So far, the answer is no. That eliminates, for the time being, the acceptance of the warming hypothesis. Many predictions have been made, many alarm bells have been rung, many dire warnings have been issued, many threats have been launchedbut no correct and useful predictions. However, scientists will say their (rejected) hypothesis is also a statement of fact. That is, it is a summary of a warming trend derived from thousands of measurements of temperatures, now and in the past, on land, sea, and air. Scientists will also claim their investigation reveals humans have directly and significantly contributed to a recent warming trend. At this point, we are leaving the method of hypothesizing and predicting, and moving to a debate about the accuracy of all those temperature measurements and the causes of any actual climate changes. Among scientists, there is a great deal of disagreement about the accuracy of the measurements. Any fair examination of studies and their critics will reveal that. In this regard, the science is not settled. Far from it. So: useless as a hypothesis, the assertion of manmade warming, as fact, is wide open to debate. To say the least. Yetbased on this non-proof, Globalists want all national governments on the planet to commit to lowering energy production by a significant and destructive percentage in the next 15 yearsto save us from a horrible fate. Their real agenda is clear: The only solution to climate change is a global energy-management network. We (the Globalist leaders) are in the best position to manage such a system. We will allocate mandated energy-use levels throughout planet Earth, region by region, nation by nation, and eventually, citizen by citizen. Yes, citizen by citizen. This is the long-term goal. This is the Globalists Holy Grail. Slavery imposed through energy. The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at NoMoreFakeNews.com or OutsideTheRealityMachine. As soon as i saw the name Happer you lost me Jon. Seems to me he is tied in with that notorious group the Heartland institute. How many of the others are as well?? As soon as you failed to address any specific science issues, you lost me, ron R. No scientific issues were addressed in this article. Only rhetoric. They will Never admit that because then that will discredit the reason they need to spray Geoengineering metals into the air, which we all know is for depopulation, however to discredit climate change is to destroy the Whole Reason (or complete lie) why they do it in the first place, they will never let the lie die for that reason alone. Perhaps there are multiple reasons for aerosol spraying. A little barium and aluminum over the western world to contaminate people with heavy metals making them sick and easily manipulated with microwaves and magnetic fields. Some coal dust over the poles to melt the ice to give the illusion of melting ice/global warming and to create terrific storms.. I think the global warming hoax collapses under its own fraudulent weight if Trump simply tells scientists and companies subsidized by federal grants that their corporate welfare is safe (in the short term) if theyll come clean and admit their sins. Theres unquestionably a place in this world for conscientious stewardship of the planet, but bilking companies (and countries) out of potentially trillions of dollars over manipulated science has to stop. Another BIG LIE ! Thanks, Jon Wonderful article! never ceases to amaze me what and who this unlimited stream of legal counterfeit currency, passed along with a click of a mouse, does buy.. Donald will end it. He will fit it and fix it fast Wings over the Rockies circa summer 2016. Previously I had bought into the man made global warming meme but during an online discussion of nuclear power surrounding the Fukushima event i was directed to Judith Currys Climate Etc web site and got my eyes opened enough to investigate the scientific debate and political agenda behind all the alarmist headlines in the, yes, MSM. This article by Rappoport is a very neat summary of the hidden agendas being pushed using AGW as cover. Universal carbon use taxation across the Empire of Usury will be a first step, to be followed at some point with carbon rationing along with all the other impositions planned under the corporate birthed IPCC and its action plan Agenda 21, now 2030 COP2, implemented locally in stealth by such corporate funded entities as ICLEI. The Apex Elite goal, as Agenda 21 opponent Rosa Koire stated, is to inventory and control all land, water, minerals, plants, animals, energies, means of production, construction, education, information, human habitation and all humans on this planet. It is now necessary to bring down policies derived from AGW as anathema to responsible governance considering the science as very inconclusive at best. As a hint that the globalists know AGW is not a proven we have the Canadian corporate Liberal government seeking to implement a universal carbon tax on the people while at the same time giving the go ahead for a dilbit tar sands pipeline to Canadas environmentally sensitive west coast. The dichotomy of these two positions speaks volumes as to intent. Try drinking PPM arsenic in your water. I wonder how those little things can effect you.. What were doing to the Earths climate is the equivalent of the International Space Station taking a hammer to their life support systems, just to see what happens. Things might turn out OK, but why take the risk? Climate scientists have been correctly predicting the course of AGW since at least as early as 1981, and theres no reason to believe they wont continue to be proven correct. The prudent course of action would be to urgently reduce the anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions which are the primary cause of todays rapid global warming, and put huge investments into looking for a way to sequester the CO2 that weve already emitted. As an initial target, we need to aim for atmospheric CO2 concentration of 350ppm, in order to eliminate the current planetary energy imbalance of 0.80.2W/m. We have to take responsibility for our actions. Geoengineering, raising cloud height, 