BBC Rides with Al Qaeda in Aleppo, SyriaBBC Covers Up War Crimes Misleads Over Syrian Security Operations. Update: Indeed BBC did not see MIGs bombing Aleppo, though it appears they werent even anti-tank SU-25s but rather training aircraft. Aero L-39 Albatros are also not even Russian-made as the BBC claimed. The article below has been amended to reflect this information. When big lies must be told, BBC is there. From Iraq to Afghanistan to Libya and now Syria, BBC has paved the way for Western disinformation meant to mange public perception around a war the public would otherwise never support or tolerate. The BBC, caught on record producing entire documentaries on behalf of corporate-financier interests, has already been caught in immense lies regarding the NATO-fueled destabilization of Syria. This includes the disingenuous use of photos from Iraq, to depict a so-called massacre in the village of Houla, Syria. Now, as NATOs Al Qaeda mercenaries operating under the banner of the so-called Free Syrian Army flow over the Turkish-Syrian border in an attempt to overrun the city of Aleppo,BBC is there, attempting to manipulate the publics perception as the conflict unfolds. BBCs Ian Pannell admits he rode with a convoy of militant fighters into Aleppo at night. He claims many are desperate for the FSA to succeed, clamoring for freedom denied by their president, but concedes many others fear an Islamic takeover and sectarian division and bloodshed. The latter of course, is self-evident, while the former is the repeated, unfounded mantra of the Western media used to cover up the latter. Covering Up FSA War Crimes Pannell then attempts to cover up serious war crimes committed by the FSA militants he is traveling with, claiming that men the FSA arbitrarily rounded up while seeking revenge were suspected Shabiha, harking back to Libyas NATO-backed terrorist death squads rounding up and killing Libyas black communities in orgies of sectarian genocide which outlets like the BBC defended as simply rebels targeting suspected African mercenaries. Pannell papers over what he just reported with the unqualified claim that there is little justice on either side. What became of the FSAs victims is not revealed. Image: From BBCs Ian Pannell young men suspected of being Shabiha are rounded up as the FSA seeks revenge. BBC fails categorically to explain how NATO-backed terrorists can liberate a city that is admittedly pro-government but it appears it will be done through terrorism, brutality, mass murder, and intimidation. BBC reporter Ian Pannells failure to report on the war crimes he admitted witnessing, smacks of endorsement and complicity an attempt to preserve the romanticism the West has desperately tried to associate with their FSA death squads. Pannells report also confirms earlier descriptions of widespread atrocities committed by the so-called Free Syrian Army. In Libya, when the government of Muammar Qaddafi collapsed, and as Libyan terrorists overran the last of the nations security forces, entire cities of Libyas blacks were overrun, their populations were either mass-murdered, imprisoned, or forced to flee to refugee camps. These are people who had lived in Libya for generations. A similar fate awaits Syrians should NATO prevail. BBC Confirms Syrian Army Use of Heavy Weapons ARE Proportional to FSA Threats Pannells propaganda in Aleppo continues, where he admits FSA militants possess tanks they allegedly captured from the Syrian military, but then, showing video of what is either an anti-tank SU-25 aircraft or an Aero L-39 Albatros training jet, rolling in with machine guns, claims it marks a dramatic escalation and a sign of desperation. Image: From BBCs Ian Pannell -FSA tanks are positioned in or around Aleppo, according to BBC. The myth that NATO-backed militants are lightly armed is unraveling as they attempt to take on large cities flush with cameras and media from both sides. Eager propagandists attempting to portray victories have more than once shown captured tanks in the hands of militants. Heavy militant weapons beget heavy government weapons. In reality, the Syrian army is using force directly proportional to the threats NATO-backed militants have presented. Tanks and heavy weapons mounted on trucks, also featured in the BBC report, are legitimate targets for government heavy weapons. The precision an SU-25 lends the battlefield, versus heavy artillery bombardments when neutralizing FSA heavy weapons, is the only conceivable way to minimize civilian casualties. Images: (Top) From BBCs Ian Pannell BBC and other Western media outlets have claimed MIGs are bombing Aleppos civilian populations. This all based on a single tweet made by BBCs Ian Pannell. Pannell now reports this video depicts what he saw which in reality is either an anti-tank SU-25 or Aero L-39 deploying machine guns, not bombs, verses what Pannell already admits are FSA heavy weapons, not civilian populations. (Bottom) Several orthographic views of the SU-25 and Aero L-39 for comparison. A government is put in a difficult position when armed gangs enter a city seeking revenge, as BBCs Ian Pannell puts it, when these gangs have trucks mounted with heavy weapons as well as tanks in their possession. For the West, to berate the Syrian government and portray its security operations as unmitigated brutality is disingenuous at best, especially considering the militants are there solely because of years of financial, military, and political support from the US, Israel, and the Gulf State despots. Image: Western hypocrisy Fallujah, Iraq in 2004 was bombarded by artillery and airstrikes for weeks leading up to the final invasion. When over 10,000 troops entered the city, they were accompanied by tanks, and supported by heavy artillery and airstrikes. When the West is subjugating others, heavy weapons seems acceptable but not when another nation attempts to defend itself from admittedly Western-backed terrorists. The West might want to also revisit the lessons it learned from flattening the Iraqi city of Fallujhah, twice. The US bombarded the city for weeks prior to its final invasion in 2004, where over 10,000 troops entered with heavy artillery and air support. Apparently it is acceptable for the West to subjugate others using such tactics, but nations are prohibited from using similar tactics to defend themselves. The Syrian uprising was a foreign-plot stretching back as far as 2007, foreign militants admittedly flowing over the border from across the Arab World,admittedly armed and funded by the US, Israel, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar. The Battle of Fullujah is considered a notch in the belt of Western military prowess, while the West condemns Syrias attempts to defend one of its most important cities from foreign subversion and destruction. While NATO believes it can still win the geopolitical battle it is waging against the Syrian people, it has already long lost the battle for moral superiority. You can support this information by voting on Reddit HERE Tony Cartaluccis articles have appeared on many alternative media websites, including his own at Land Destroyer Report. Read other contributed articles by Tony Cartalucci here. linkwithin_text=Related Articles: 