Aung San Suu Kyis Saffron Monks Stalk Streets With Machetes - Mass Slaughtering RefugeesTony Cartalucci In Southeast Asias Myanmar, already 20 are reported dead in the latest genocidal violence carried out by Nobel Laureate Aung San Suu Kyis Saffron monk political movement. CNNs, Armed Buddhists, including monks, clash with Muslims in Myanmar, reports that: Buddhist monks and others armed with swords and machetes Friday stalked the streets of a city in central Myanmar, where sectarian violence that has left about 20 people dead has begun to spread to other areas, according to local officials. The article also added that: CNNs citing of the corporate-financier funded International Crisis Group, which has supported and engineered similar strife elsewhere around the world, including Egypt in 2011, is particularly foreshadowing. And as in previous spates of recent violence, Aung San Suu Kyi has once again allowed opportunities to call on her own supporters to stand down, slip by in silent complicity. Suu Kyis Saffron Monks Similar violence in September of last year revealed the name of one of the leading monks. AFPs September 2012 article, Monks stage anti-Rohingya march in Myanmar, refers to the leader of these mobs as a monk named Wirathu. However, this isnt merely a monk named Wirathu, but Sayadaw (venerable teacher) Wirathu who has led many of democratic champion Aung San Suu Kyis political street campaigns and is often referred to by the Western media as an activist monk. In March 2012, Wirathu had led a rally calling for the release of so-called political prisoners, so designated by US State Department funded faux-NGOs. Wirathu himself was in prison, according to AFP, for inciting hatred against Muslims, until recently released as part of an amnesty, an amnesty US State Department-funded (page 15, .pdf) Democratic Voice of Burma claims concerned only political prisoners. While Western news agencies have attempted to spin the recent violence as a new phenomenon implicating Aung San Suu Kyis political foot soldiers as genocidal bigots; in reality, the sectarian nature of her support base has been back page news for years. AFPs recent but uncharacteristically honest portrayal of Wirathu, with an attempt to conceal his identity and role in Aung San Suu Kyis Saffron political machine, illustrates the quandary now faced by Western propagandists as the violence flares up again, this time in front of a better informed public. The UK Independent in their article, Burmas monks call for Muslim community to be shunned, mentions the Young Monks Association by name as involved in distributing flyers recently, demanding people not to associate with ethnic Rohingya, and attempting to block humanitarian aid from reaching Rohingya camps. The Independent also notes calls for ethnic cleansing made by leaders of the 88 Generation Students group (BBC profile here) who also played a pivotal role in the pro-Suu Kyi 2007 protests. Ashin Htawara, another monk activist who considers Aung San Suu Kyi, his special leader and greeted her with flowers for her Oslo Noble Peace Prize address earlier this year, stated at an event in London that the Rohingya should be sent back to their native land. While in late 2012 the Western media attempted to ignore the genocidal nature of Suu Kyis Saffron Monks, now it appears that more are catching on. The International Business Times published recently an article titled, Burmese Bin Laden: Is Buddhist Monk Wirathu Behind Violence in Myanmar? stating: The shadow of controversial monk Wirathu, who has led numerous vocal campaigns against Muslims in Burma, looms large over the sectarian violence in Meikhtila. Wirathu played an active role in stirring tensions in a Rangoon suburb in February, by spreading unfounded rumours that a local school was being developed into a mosque, according to the Democratic voice of Burma. An angry mob of about 300 Buddhists assaulted the school and other local businesses in Rangoon. The monk, who describes himself as the Burmese Bin Laden said that his militancy is vital to counter aggressive expansion by Muslims. He was arrested in 2003 for distributing anti-Muslim leaflets and has often stirred controversy over his Islamophobic activities, which include a call for the Rhohingya and kalar, a pejorative term for Muslims of South Asian descent, to be expelled from Myanmar. He has also been implicated in religious clashes in Mandalay, where a dozen people died, in several local reports. The article also cites the Burma Campaign UK, whose director is attempting to rework the Wests narrative in Myanmar to protect their long-groomed proxy Suu Kyi, while disavowing the violence carried out by a movement they themselves have propped up, funded, and directed for many years. Like their US-funded (and armed) counterparts in Syria, many fighting openly under the flag of sectarian extremism held aloft by international terrorist organization Al Qaeda, we see the absolute moral bankruptcy of Myanmars pro-democracy movement that has, up until now, been skillfully covered up by endless torrents of Western propaganda Aung San Suu Kyis Nobel Peace Prize and recent Chatham House Prize all being part of the illusion. And just like in Syria, the West will continue supporting and intentionally fueling the violence while attempting to compartmentalize the crisis politically to maintain plausible deniability. Aung San Suu Kyi is a Western Proxy In Myanmar (Burma) Pro-Democracy Movement a Creation of Wall Street London, it was documented that Suu Kyi and organizations supporting her, including local propaganda fronts like the New Era Journal, the Irrawaddy, and the Democratic Voice of Burma (DVB) radio, have received millions of dollars a year from the Neo-Conservative chaired National Endowment for Democracy, convicted criminal and Wall Street speculator George Soros Open Society Institute, and the US State Department itself, citing Britains own Burma Campaign UK (.pdf). And not only does the US State Department in tandem with Western corporate media provide Aung San Suu Kyi extensive political, financial, and rhetorical backing, they provide operational capabilities as well, allowing her opposition movement to achieve Western objectives throughout Myanmar. The latest achievement of this operational capability successfully blocked the development of Myanmars infrastructure by halting a joint China-Mynamar dam project that would have provided thousands of jobs, electricity, state-revenue, flood control, and enhanced river navigation for millions. Suu Kyi and her supporting network of NGOs, as well as armed militants in Myanmars northern provinces conducted a coordinated campaign exploiting both environmental and human rights concerns that in reality resulted in Myanmars continual economic and social stagnation. The ultimate goal of course is to effect regime change not only in Myanmar, but to create a united Southeast Asian front against China. The unqualified progress the US claims is now being made in Myanmar moves forward in tandem with Myanmars opening to Western corporate-financier interests. As reported in June, 2011s Collapsing China, as far back as 1997 there was talk about developing an effective containment strategy coupled with the baited hook of luring China into its place amongst the international order. Just as in these 1997 talking-points where author and notorious Neo-Con policy maker Robert Kagan described the necessity of using Americas Asian allies as part of this containment strategy, Clinton goes through a list of regional relationships the US is trying to cultivate to maintain American leadership in Asia. The US backing of puppet-regimes like that of Thailands Thaksin Shinawatra, his sister Yingluck, or Myanmars Aung San Suu Kyi, installing them into power, and keeping them there is central to projecting power throughout Asia and keeping China subordinate, or as Kagan put it in his 1997 report, these proxy regimes will have China play Gulliver to Southeast Asias Lilliputians, with the United States supplying the rope and stakes. Two of these Lilliputians are Yingluck Shinawatra and Aung San Suu Kyi, the rope and stakes are the street mobs and disingenuous NGOs funded by the US State Department to support their consolidation of power. It is essential to look past the empty rhetoric of democracy, human rights, and progress used to justify foreign-funding and meddling to install servile autocrats like Thailands Thaksin, Myanmars Aung San Suu Kyi, or even Malaysias proxy dictator-in-waiting Anwar Ibrahim, and see the greater geopolitical game at play. It is also essential to expose the disingenuous organizations, institutions, and media personalities helping promote this global corporate-fascist agenda. With Suu Kyis movement now being exposed as violent, sectarian-driven mobs rather than the pro-democracy front it was claimed to be by its sponsors in the West, it remains to be seen whether well-meaning people worldwide turn their backs on this carefully crafted hoax and the corporate-financier interests that created it and instead seek genuine causes that abandon political struggle for pragmatic solutions. Tony Cartaluccis articles have appeared on many alternative media websites, including his own at Land Destroyer Report, Alternative Thai News Network and LocalOrg. Read other contributed articles by Tony Cartalucci here. linkwithin_text=Related Articles: 