Terrorists in Syria Using Prisoners as Human BombsNYT embeds with war criminals, spin and excuse craven human rights violations as cunning. One can only imagine the headlines had the Syrian government been caught using blindfolded prisoners to deliver trucks to enemy targets, told freedom was at hand when in reality they were delivering vehicles packed full of explosives and wereessentially unwitting human bombs. Curt articles with headlines like ASSAD REGIME USES HUMAN BOMBS! would surely be splashed across the Western press. Image: This man, identified as Abu Hilal, was told hed be given his freedom as part of a prisoner exchange. In reality, terrorists had planted a bomb in the bed of the truck Hilal would be driving and planned to detonate it remotely as he approached a military checkpoint. Undermining yet another myth of the fraudulent War on Terror, it appears that Al Qaeda-affiliated terrorists, in Syria, Iraq, and beyond, have used unwitting human bombs driving vehicles or carrying parcels rigged with explosives they had no knowledge of claiming they are suicide bombers. However, it is terrorist militants operating in Syria that are employing these very tactics, apparently so frequently the Western media has feared eventually the story would get out. What would follow was a limited hangout provided courtesy of the New York Times, with copious amounts of literary padding to portray the craven war criminals as human and their premeditated violation of human rights as desperate, even justified. What the NYT does, is attempt with its long-winded narrative to humanize and endear to us the militants before revealing just what they did. However, the nearly 4,000-word article boils down to just 4 sentences: The real plan was beginning to emerge. It involved the prisoner, Abu Hilal. The assurances that he would be released had been a deception. The fighters intended to put him behind the wheel of the truck bomb near the checkpoint and tell him to drive forward in a prisoner exchange. The NYT would claim that the bomb failed leaving the terrorists disappointed. But in Syria, sectarian terrorists, many with direct ties to Al Qaeda, have been employing bombings like this for months, many of which have been categorized as suicide bombings. Surely had the NYTs terrorist hosts succeeded, yet another suicide bombing would have been marked down. It had been reported in May 2012, that terrorists operating in Syria had begun using bombs to target both the military and civilians, with entire factories dedicated to the production of explosive devices. Many of these bombs were being built by Al Qaeda-affiliated terrorists who had participated in the Iraqi civil war, cultivated by the West itself to break the back of joint Sunni-Shiia resistance to US occupation. Also, during the Iraq War and US occupation throughout it, there were reports of Iraqis having their vehicles impounded by Western forces, and upon securing the release of their vehicles discovering they had been rigged with explosives in a scenario very similar to what is now being seen by US-funded, armed, and backed terrorists in Syria. What the New York Times has done, and many other Western media houses like it have been doing, is observing war crimes, then promptly spinning and excusing them. Concurrently, they manipulate Syrian Army operations, or even fabricate events, to demonize the Syrian government. This is war propaganda, and it is in itself is a war crime punishable under the Nuremberg precedent. As war criminals, the Western press certainly have found ideological allies amongst the terrorists ravaging Syria. You can support this information by voting on Reddit HERE linkwithin_text=Related Articles: 