Zero Dark Thirty Wins Albert Speer Oscar For Best Propaganda PictureHollywood history is all the rage these days, but it comes at a huge cost. One of the most pervasive trends in 21st century western culture has become somewhat of an obsession in America. Its called Hollywood history, where the corporate studio machines in Los Angeles spend hundreds of millions of dollars in order to craft and precisely tailor historical events to suit the prevailing political paradigm. Hollywood history is very much in fashion these days. From Linclon to Dubya, and from Blackhawk Down to The Iron Lady, they constitute a significant portion of todays major releases. Theres only one problem, however, with tailoring a story to fit neatly into a prevailing political paradigm and over the last 100 years, the Germans and the Soviets did this too with devastating effect, but back then we just called it propaganda. No film embodies the Hollywood historical treatment more than the much celebrated cinema release of Zero Dark Thirty, directed by Kathryn Bigelow, and one of the favourites to grab an armful of Academy Awards this weekend in LA including Best Picture, Bigelow for best director, Mark Boal for best screenplay, and Jessica Chastain for Best Actress. The films main premise is constructed around a female CIA officer, played by Chastain, and her dogged determination to find the highly elusive mastermind of 9/11 and the al Qaedas MVP, Osama bin Laden. Chastains performance, critics claim, has also empowered women by showing how her film character caught bin Laden, but it didnt actually happen that way. Well get to that later. Where this film starts to take heat is with its sensational on screen CIA torture scenes. Unlike previously less celebrated but more integral, intellectual cinematic efforts at taking on torture like Rendition and Lions for Lambs, Bigelow seemed incredibly bent on going the distance to glorify (through her attempt at Cinma vrit) the troubling practice of torture by the CIA as a means to glean intelligence about the whereabouts of various Islamic terrorists scattered throughout the worlds third world cesspits. In fact, the US Senate Intelligence Committee spent four years investigating the CIAs torture program, and according to Senators Diane Feinstein and John McCain, the CIAs vaunted torture program under Obama did not lead to bin Laden (thats the only true statement you will ever hear surrounding the governments Osama bin Laden tale). Zero Darks glorification of torture is merely the first level of moral descent, however, because you see, theres still the thorny issue of Osama bin Laden to deal with One thing was clear when watching this film, and also by the reactions of theatre goers at my screening in Brixton, South London, that Zero Dark marks a new low point in Americas now fashionable politicised culture, and Bigelow must be aware of this because she seemed to play this card shamelessly in her highly politicised film. Never before in the history of cinema has there been such a break-neck rush to complete and release a motion picture so soon after the said event, to serialise the legendary Hunt for Bin Laden, and the greatest manhunt in history by a gallant Seal Team 6, ending in the siege of the terror kingpins alleged place of abode a compound located in Abbotabad, Pakistan. Apparently, Bigelows production was already in motion in May 2011 in advance of the White Houses announcement that Seal Team 6 had killed Bin Laden, and Bigelow it seems, was either persuaded or herself decided (its not clear which one it was), to rewrite the films script in order to theatrically chronicle what President Obama had put forward as his greatest achievement since taking office. This was the birth of Zero Dark Thirty. Others are investigating whether the movies filmmakers received quiet government funding to promote torture, since they did obtain classified information, according to many reports. Unfortunately for Bigelow, and as some of us learned with Iraq, so-called classified information is only as credible as its source (US intelligence unfortunately has a spotty record of late). If Pentagon propaganda, or bolstering President Obamas political trophy were the motives, then one could compare this films creators to similarly well-paid cinematic forebears like Albert Speer, or Leni Riefenstahl. Female cinematic icon Riefenstahls involvement in crafting Nazi government propaganda was eventually her undoing. After the Reich fell in 1945, she still maintained that her films were works of art and claimed that they had nothing to do with Nazi politics and propaganda. With all the lies and propaganda swirling around Washingtons own criminal class, it will be interesting to see how filmmakers like Bigelow will defend their own art in years to come. But its hardly the first time Hollywood has been accused of gross misuse of its creative license. Its become the norm, rather than the exception. Other Hollywood attempts to hold the governments line on history include the box office debacle, Flight 93, which derived its plot, characters and production design solely from the federal governments own Official 9/11 Report. Evidence fleshed out since points to the obvious scenario that Flight 93 was actually shot down by a US jet fighter, with its debris spread over 20 miles in and around Shanksville, PA in 2001. No matter, Hollywood kept to the governments original outdated script of lets roll!. The sheer volume of mistruths which have been fed downwards by the US government and its corporate media apologists over the last decade is staggering, and has had quite of profound, polarising effect on media consumers North America and Western Europe. The avalanche of state-sponsored and corporation-sponsored propaganda over the last decade in particular, appears to have successfully divided society into two groups: those who believe official propaganda and government released narratives of major events and those who question it. Its safe to say that the sort of people who would never admit in public to questioning the governments official explanations about what happened on 9/11 are generally the same section of the population who would accept a film like Zero Dark Thirty as recorded history. These might also be the same type of people who believed in advance of Americas bombing and invasion of Iraq Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. The bin Laden mythology is powerful, however, and millions of people will walk away from this film feeling as if theyve learned something about what its like working on the gritty side of the CIA. Under normal circumstances, I would not pay for a ticket to see a historical production which I believe was based on a fictional narrative. I made an exception in this case because it was the only way I could review the film in time to write this piece. But the most profound realisation I got whilst watching the movie was a very sad one. I felt sorry for the director, the cast and all the production crew who put in their hard work and sweat, and probably believed that bin Laden was indeed in the Abbotabad compound in May 2011, and that they were reenacting a rare and proud piece of American history. In order to believe this, they would also would have to have believed that somehow, the same bin Laden also masterminded a multi-pronged assault that managed to bypass the whole of the US Defense apparatus all from his legendary cave in Tora Bora. Its no surprise how much both the Bush and Obama governments and the corporate military industrial complex has benefited from maintaining the mythology of a living Osama bin Laden since 2001. Unfortunately, the mythology does not measure up to reality, with multiple admissions in public by heads of state by Pervez Musharraf, and Benazir Bhutto, as well as by Madeline Albright and others, and even mainstream media reports going all the way back to 2001, stating that Osama bin Laden was dying, or had in fact died in late 2001. Knowing all this, when I heard the news of Obama and the Navy Seal Team 6 raid on bin Laden, I knew immediately that not only was this almost certainly a fiction, but that their would be no photographs and videos released, because a dead man cannot come back to life after 10 years for a photo session. As predicted, a few days later the White House confirmed my suspicions, announcing that indeed, no photos or video will be released On top of that, we were also told that they dumped bin Ladens body at sea 48 hours after allegedly killing him. Fancy that? But even that pillar of the official fell apart later when it was revealed that no US sailors aboard the USS Carl Vinson ever saw the alleged burial at sea, and that no images exist in any government records of bin Laden aboard the decorated US sea vessel. Hard to believe, but only if you believe the governments official fiction on the fate of Osama bin Laden. Also, unknown to Kathryn Bigelow and her crew at the time of production, there was no DNA identification of bin Laden by the Pentagon either, and no autopsy was done. Its as if he was merely a ghost. Does that mean that White House announcements to the contrary back in May 2011 were lies? Yes, it does. So lets get that straight. There is evidence to strongly suggest that bin Laden wasnt even there at Abbotabad in 2011, but theres NO evidence to prove that he was there. These facts certainly give my own statements on the incident even more credibility, but thats nothing to cheer about. We were lied to, again. Zero Dark is also flanked this year by another historical effort which has relied heavy on Hollywood brand of artistic license is Ben Afflecks Iranian hostage drama, Argo, which most analysts agree was heavily padded with imaginative characters, written-in backstories and invented obstacles, all woven together to create an interesting and entertaining piece of film much the same way Charlie Wilsons War was a jovial depiction of the CIAs gun-running in the Soviet-Afghan War, painted by Hollywood as a story of American heroism for the ages. There are literally dozens of other examples of invented Hollywood history, these are only a few. Rarely (if ever) has Hollywood ever actually challenged the political paradigm or the power of the Pentagon in one of its historical productions. Argo and Charlie Wilsons semi-fiction might seem like harmless Hollywood history to many movie goers, but altering history for entertainment purposes is not just deceptive, besides the fact that its not true yet its being passed off as history, it also borders on mass brainwashing, further distorting generational truths about what our nations governments actually get up to on tax payers time. Rather than betting the farm on a quirky piece of historical trivia, will film goers ever see the day that a director like Affleck might try to tackle the Iran Contra Scandal and the CIA running guns to Nicaragua and Cocaine into Louisiana and Arkansas airports? Or reveal how the same CIA, with the help of the FBI, was responsible for introducing crack cocaine to the streets of Los Angeles during the 1980s, or even about the CIA shipping heroin out of Afghanistan after 2001? Likewise, ignoring the true historical context that it was the very same CIA, with the help of Saudi oil money, who created and trained the present day al Qaeda by employing the likes of Osama bin Laden to handle the terror groups finances over the decades. Sadly, spending $150 million on a film production that could reveal actual history to out govt corruption is probably asking too much from Hollywoods bold and beautiful. No, no, stick to quirky revisions of history, non-events, or outright inventions, and then bask in all the pomp of Oscar night. In the end, Zero Dark can only be summed up as one big, expensive lie in celluloid, in the Riefenstahl and Speer tradition. Regardless of how many awards it wins this winter thats how history will eventually label Kathryn Bigelows latest piece of moving art. The good news is the truth has no expiration date, and political propaganda eventually collapses under the weight of its own inflated sense of purpose. All we are seeing here, is simply Hollywood drifting further towards Washington DC. RELATED ACTIVIST POST ARTICLE: Patrick Henningsens many articles and latest video reports can be found at 21st Century Wire where this article first appeared. linkwithin_text=Related Articles: 