Some Want Injustice To Be Distributed Evenly, Rather Than Not At AllBy Vin Armani Yet some people screamed that it was an injustice for the white Bundys to go free, as if theyd prefer them be locked up indefinitely for exercising their 1st amendment rights. #crimingwhilewhite trended after the verdict. Some people almost seemed upset that more of the Bundys didnt get killed by police. If you recall, one of them, LaVoy Finicum, was killed in cold blood with his arms raised. Then the FBI got caught lying about it. Some want injustice to be distributed evenly, rather than not at all , Vin Armani responds in this powerful segment of his Monday show (1pm EST, 10AM Pacific). Vin Armani is the host of The Vin Armani Show on selfnews Post, TV Star of Gigolos on Showtime, Author, DJ, and Agorist Entrepreneur. Follow Vin on Twitter and subscribe on YouTube. Fake honey trap. There is no such thing as a legal gun, to the author of this article. ALL weapons are protected as arms under our natural right to be armed under that pesky Bill of Rights that so many dont like. Well, we can have whatever weapons we want, anywhere in public, on public land, in our homes/cars, etc and we dont need permission or permits to have them either. Thats all. You can, but you wont be walking around freely for long if you exercise that right. The Bundys went into a federal facility armed. It is illegal to go into a federal facility armed unless you are a law enforcement office. The Bundys are thugs. They still owe the tax payers $20 MILLION in back grazing fees. BTW: the federal government manages land for the people. She is wrong. The government owns military bases So its your opinion that the central govt owns everything?Sounds like communism to me. The FBI shot an killed a woman and her baby on top of Ruby Ridge. The Bundy family pointed guns at the law, how is that exercising their constitutional rights, maybe you better reread the constitution. Unarmed people are murdered, by law enforcement and people like the Bundys cheer, especially if they are black. Many in law enforcement share the Bundys views and are sympathizers. There was a black land protest group and they were met with violence, on day one. I like many of selfnews Post articles on the Deep State. To my dismay many white Libertarians are closet White Supremacist. I may have reexamine my support for Libertarian venues, is liberty only for a certain segment, or for all? No they didnt. All the footage only shows guns pointed one way, at citizens. Nonsense! Youre as wrongs as the traitors in our government who committed these unconstitutional acts against the free people! Praise God for this victory! Nevertheless, not to be overlooked in this is that this could have never occurred if not for the Constitution they were appealing to, specifically Amendment 5s provision for property confiscation: The Fifth Amendment concludes with the provisions that no one shall be deprived of property without due process of law and private property [shall not] be taken for public use without just compensation. Because this provision allows the government to legally steal private citizens lands, these assurances are a cover for theft. Because of Amendment 5s promise of just compensation, most people do not even think to ask whose due process of law is going to be employed and whether the governments confiscation of private lands for public use is ethical or whether governments should own property at all. According to the United States Constitution, just compensation is what the government, not the private owner, decides is equitable. Moreover the prince shall not take of the peoples inheritance by oppression, to thrust them out of their possession that my people be not scattered every man from his possession. (Ezekiel 46:18). The Fifth Amendments provision for property confiscation is applied in eminent domain, which is nothing more than a form of organized theft: Thou shalt not remove thy neighbours landmark, which they of old time have set in thine inheritance. (Deuteronomy 19:14) Eminent domain the Constitutional Republics alleged right to seize property for the betterment of the people is one way the government moves boundary markers and steals from its citizens. Bouviers Law Dictionary defines eminent domain, in part, as follows: The superior right of property subsisting in a sovereignty, by which private property may in certain cases be taken or its use controlled for the public benefit, without regard to the wishes of the owner. The right of every government to appropriate otherwise than by taxation and its police authority private property for public use.21. The creation of public lands is another method employed by the Constitutional Republic to move boundary markers. Identifying these lands as public is part of the ruse to conceal the theft. Except that the public is permitted limited access, they are not public at all. These lands, which are often stolen by legislation (such as the Wilderness Act of 1964, the Clean Air Act of 1970, the Endangered Species Act of 1973, and the Clean Water Act of 1977) from private property owners, are owned by the government, not the public. Public lands are just the tip of the iceberg. All of America is owned by federal and state governments via their claim to property taxes and eminent domain. For more, see online Chapter 14 Amendment 5: Constitutional vs. Biblical Judicial Protection of Bible Law vs. the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective. Click on my picture, then our website. Go to our Online Books page, click on the top entry, and scroll down to Chapter 14. Then find out how much you REALLY know about the Constitution as compared to the Bible. Take our 10-question Constitution Survey at in the right-hand sidebar and receive a complimentary copy of a book that EXAMINES the Constitution by the Bible. 