Royal Society Believes Depopulation Will Save the EnvironmentSusanne Posel, Contributor They have published a report on their website entitled People and the Planet. According to the Royal Society, the worlds human population, coupled with unprecedented levels of consumption present profound challenges to human health and well being, and the natural environment. This group of Eco-fascists believes that securitizing the resources of third world countries, combined with reducing their consumption globally will stabilize the planets failing environment. Sir John Sulson of the Human Genome Project suggests that this is a topic that has gone to and fro in the last few decades, and appears to be moving back up the political agenda now.So it seems a good moment for the Royal Society to launch a study that looks objectively at the scientific basis for changes in population, for the different regional and cultural factors that may affect that, and at the effects that population changes will have on our future in term of sustainable development. The Royal Society is supporting the UNs plan for the Virtuous Green Path that they will unveil at the Earth Summit in Rio+20 this June. The UN has moved their focus to biodiversity; blaming humanity for not only climate change, deforestation and depletion of water resources, but also the untold loss of species of animals every year. The UN and the Royal Society fail to point out that these issues are directly caused by multinational corporations and governments who are responsible for this specific destruction impacting our planet. Rather, these globalists call for depopulation the mass murder of 90% of the human population to save the planet from devastation. According to a UN report , The population of the most developed countries will remain virtually unchanged at 1.2 billion until 2050. They suppose that third world countries are having population explosion that is destroying the planet. While they believe that industrialized countries even out their populations through societal controls, those populations of unindustrialized countries are out of control. The report from the Royal Society suggest that through resource consumption reduction, combined with required family planning programs and changing our perspective of population and environment as one subject will solve this problem. Jules Pretty of the Royal Society working group is proposing, When we slow down population growth we empower women and provide more money for least developed countries to invest in education. The majority of women want fewer children. Jonathon Porritt , member of the Royal Society and former chair of the UK Sustainable Development Commission has stated on record that the British population must be reduced from 60 million to 30 million to remain a sustainable society. Professor Paul Ehrlich, who co-authored Ecoscience with Obamas Science Czar John Holdren, was quoted in theGuardian as supporting a drastic population reduction before the population rises to 9 billion in 2050. Ehrlich said: How many you support depends on lifestyles. We came up with 1.5 to 2 billion because you can have big active cities and wilderness. If you want a battery chicken world where everyone has minimum space and food and everyone is kept just about alive you might be able to support in the long term about 4 or 5 billion people. But you already have 7 billion. So we have to humanely and as rapidly as possible move to population shrinkage . . . The question is: can you go over the top without a disaster, like a worldwide plague or a nuclear war between India and Pakistan? If we go on at the pace we are theres going to be various forms of disaster. Some maybe slow motion disasters like people getting more and more hungry, or catastrophic disasters because the more people you have the greater the chance of some weird virus transferring from animal to human populations, there could be a vast die-off. Global Elite societies have a clear agenda that involve depopulation through the guise of environmentalism, CO2 reduction and governmental control. They narcissistically publish their writings because it is always easier to hide in plain sight. We need to pay more attention to the agendas behind the people we place in positions of influential power. RELATED ACTIVIST POST ARTICLES: The Royal Society, Neuroscience, and Military Mind Wars Susanne Posel is the Chief Editor of Occupy Corporatism. Our alternative news site is dedicated to reporting the news as it actually happens; not as it is spun by the corporately funded mainstream media. You can find us on our Facebook page. linkwithin_text=Related Articles: 