Middle East Turmoil Is Complete Theatre - War Is On The HorizonBy Brandon Turbeville While the Western press and corporate media outlets have taken to presenting the Iran nuclear deal as either a tragic capitulation to the deadly warmongering Iranians or a brilliant lunge for peace with the deadly warmongering Iranians, the premise of their presentations are exactly the same that Iran is dangerous, wants war, and is doing whatever it can to acquire a nuclear weapon. This is, of course, despite the fact that there is no evidence that Iran is attempting to gain a nuclear weapon or has any aggressive intent in the region. In fact, the US and Israeli intelligence organizations have both determined that Iran does not have a nuclear weapon nor is it attempting to acquire one. Indeed, it has been admitted by military industrial complex firm, The RAND Corporation, that Irans military capabilities were largely defensive, not offensive. Even further, not only was Iran well within its rights to do everything it was doing in regards to nuclear energy and technology, the agreement signed with the West was an extraordinary act of conciliation and cooperation. Indeed, Iran bent over backwards to appease the West in its imperialists aims. That being said, I have argued from the very beginning of the US-Iran nuclear talks that the diplomacy taking place was nothing more than theatre to be used later in the rush to war as evidence that the US did everything in its power to avoid confrontation. While the future is impossible to predict, one might reasonably believe that the US will soon sabotage the nuclear deal whose final touches and signatures are due at the end of June 2015. Indeed, there is the distinct likelihood that the US will soon attempt to implement some egregious demand and condition upon Iran that the Iranians will be unable to accept, thus ending the nuclear talks. Another possibility would be that the US and Iran are able to sign off on a deal but, soon thereafter, the US will claim that the Iranians are in violation of some minuscule and vague rule, causing them to be in violation of the deal and subsequently causing the deal to fall apart. Any violation or disruption of the nuclear deal will then be used by the US, NATO, and Israel to justify military action against Iran. Already the ripples of sabotage are able to be seen from NATO quarters. For instance, French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius stated that, if Iran does not agree to inspections of military facilities, the deal will be off. France will not accept a deal if it is not clear that inspections can be done at all Iranian installations, including military sites, he said. Americas fanatics are also threatening to push for the abandonment of the deal based on Irans possible refusal to allow the snap inspections of military facilities and the interviewing of nuclear scientists. For example, Lindsey Graham recently stated that there is not a snowballs chance in hell that the deal will be agreed to by the US Congress. Im saying if theres a final deal that doesnt require anytime, anywhere inspections, that the Senate will not go along with that, he said. He also stated that Ill wait and see how it looks on paper, but if you dont have any time, anywhere inspections, forget about it. I just dont think any Democrat or Republican is going to agree to allow that to become binding. These outlandish demands, of course, are already seen as a sticking point with the Iranians. As Thomas Erdbink and David Sanger reported for the New York Times, Irans concern is entirely legitimate. The inspection of military sites would amount to intelligence gathering operations sanctioned and enforced by the UN and the perception of international consensus. Likewise, the interviews of Iranian nuclear scientists could be seen as intelligence gathering operations or, just as likely, intimidation sessions. This is especially relevant after a number of Iranian nuclear personnel have been assassinated over the last few years, acts which were clearly committed by Israel. So already we begin to see the rift between the Iranians and the Western powers who have long been intent on invading and/or destabilizing the Persian nation. Already we are seeing the rumblings of what may become a major sticking point and deal-breaking demand of the West, assuring that not only is the nuclear deal scrapped and sanctions continued, but that NATO, the US, or Israel will use Irans non-compliance and insistence upon attempts to build a nuclear bomb as justification for a military attack on the country. The plan for a Western or a Western/Israeli attack on Iran, along with the theatre of alleged US-Israeli tensions leading up to a strike and outright war, has been in the works for some time. For instance, in 2009, the Brookings Institution, a major banking, corporate, and military-industrial firm, released a report entitled Which Path To Persia? Options For A New American Strategy For Iran, in which the authors mapped out a plan which leaves no doubt as to the ultimate desire from the Western financier, corporate, and governing classes. The plan involves the description of a number of ways the Western oligarchy would be able to destroy Iran including outright military invasion and occupation. However, the report attempts to outline a number of methods that might possibly be implemented before direct military invasion would be necessary. The plan included attempting to foment destabilization inside Iran via the color revolution apparatus, violent unrest, proxy terrorism, and limited airstrikes conducted by the US, Israel or both. Interestingly enough, the report states that any action taken against Iran must be done after the idea that Iran has rejected a fair and generous offer by the West has been disseminated throughout the general public. The report reads, Ironically, it is admitted by the authors of the report that the Iranians are not governed by lunatics intent on nuking the world but by entirely rational players. Still, they move forward with a number of options for attacking Iran. It should thus be obvious to anyone reading this report that the US, NATO, and Israel are uninterested in peace with Iran and are entirely focused on war and Iranian destruction. The report continues to discuss the citations that could be used for an attack on Iran, clearly stating its intentions to create a plan to goad a non-threatening nation into war. It states, The question of the Israeli role in the possible attack against Iran is also mentioned by Brookings. In fact, in the chapter entitled, Allowing or Encouraging An Israeli Military Strike, Brookings not only outlines a potential strategy but essentially admits that the US-Israeli tension being hyped in the Western media is nothing more than a farce. It says, For those who believe that the Obama administration is hostile to the Israelis and their agenda, one need only look toward the decimated cities of Syria and the wasteland that is Libya in order to see that the opposite is the case. The Obama administration, like the previous administration, has been marching in lock step with the Israelis since the very beginning and nothing has changed. The only difference is that the current administration is that of a Democratic President, thus the perception that Obama is weak on his support for Israel must be played up as a narrative. That narrative, however, is just that a narrative. It has no basis in reality whatsoever. The tentative agreement between the US and Iran regarding the latters nuclear program, with Israel wailing in the background, can easily be seen as a playout of the plan described by the Brookings Institution where an attack on Iran will come after it is perceived that Iran has rejected a superb offer. The Israelis are not dissatisfied with the United States nor is the United States dissatisfied with Israel. Both parties are merely playing a role in a carefully scripted act that ultimately involves more war against the enemies of Anglo-American imperialism and the world oligarchy. Do not be fooled by propaganda. While the Iranians are busy negotiating, the Americans and the Israelis are busy gearing up for war. Recently from Brandon Turbeville: Brandon Turbeville is an author out of Florence, South Carolina. He has a Bachelors Degree from Francis Marion University and is the author of six books, Codex Alimentarius The End of Health Freedom, 7 Real Conspiracies,Five Sense Solutionsand Dispatches From a Dissident, volume 1 and volume 2, and The Road to Damascus: The Anglo-American Assault on Syria.Turbeville has published over 500 articles dealing on a wide variety of subjects including health, economics, government corruption, and civil liberties. Brandon Turbevilles podcast Truth on The Tracks can be found every Monday night 9 pm EST at UCYTV. He is available for radio and TV interviews. Please contact activistpost (at) gmail.com. 