Multivitamin Hitpieces - A Natural Health False Flag?Heather Callaghan Chances are, youve recently been barraged by not-so-subtle headlines attacking multivitamins. The mainstream articles were very loosely and poorly based on three simultaneous and ridiculously flawed studies. If anyone bothers to read the studies, they might find that they are simply a vehicle for an attack an attack so gratuitous and heavy handed to make one wonder about their MO. But the real attack on multivitamins stems from a mere editorial cited by a media regurgitating the words case closed, we dont need multivitamins, evidence mounting [against multivitamins], enough is enough and projections like the vitamin industrial complex. Oh, so the gavel has been slammedGod forbid someone have their own preference about a consumer product. But who is actually saying this and by whom are they funded? Brandon Turbeville writes of one of the three studies: Interestingly enough, this study was not only funded by the National Institutes of Health but also by DSM Nutritional Products, Pfizer, and BASF. Pfizer and BASF, two multinational pharmaceutical manufacturers are widely known as organizations that are hostile toward the sale and manufacture of nutritional products as well as corporations that would stand to gain by an increase in poor health and medical treatment. DSM Nutritional Products, while lesser known, is a multinational chemical company that also manufactures nutritional supplements of thesynthetic variety. DSM is a corporate colleague of Cargill and has worked closely with the UN-based World Food Programme. The carrier articles like to claim that the multivitamin industry runs up to $28 billion annually well, so what? First, that means theres an interest and consumer demand. Secondly, it sounds like people dont feel like theyre getting enough nutrition no matter how many times they are told to follow failing, pathetic dietary guidelines. And the Western modern medical complex trumps the multivitamin sales by a whopping $2 trillion annually! So it looks like they would have a vested interest in keeping you there even if pharmaceuticals kill about 100,000 people each year. What harm have wholesome vitamins and minerals done again? When is more nutrition a bad thing? Furthermore: There are also a few shill-type doctor mouthpieces supporting calls to constantly reduce the perceived amount of nutrients needed they just keep lowering the levels. I remember going down a maddening rabbit hole two years ago involving a doctor claiming vitamin D was toxic and telling people to take barely noticeable levels he had ties to Big Pharma and was involved with a pharmaceutical company to create doctor-prescribed synthetic vitamin D. Hopefully, you have access to highly bioavailable or whole food based supplements hang on to them. They might go the path of the incandescent light bulbs soon if directives under Codex Alimentarius continue this way in America. But why say false flag in terms of natural health? Because weve been down this road before This hit piece could be more than just a Christmas sale for a medical industrial complex trying to deter people from healthy goals outside of modern treatments. It could be the preparation to sneak more global health rules on a people largely unaware. It would be interesting to see if the vitamin/supplement industry takes a hit for this media campaign. And which side of it really suffers: the toxic fake Big Pharma vitamins, or real and valuable vitamins/minerals/supplements that are helping people. On the other hand, our good vitamins and supplements could very well be going straight to the toilet if we arent set up to digest them. Stay tuned, Ill be writing about how to make sure that doesnt happen! Also See: Heather Callaghan is a natural health blogger and food freedom activist. You can see her work atNaturalBlaze.com and selfnewsPost.com. Like at Facebook. Recent posts byHeather Callaghan: 