San Bernardino Shooting Parallels Recent Oregon College MassacreBy Niles and Frasier Mercado The amount of shootings nationally has been steadily declining, even if you choose to include the shooting hoaxes the media has been sensationalizing as real events. Reality is just not that interesting. If it werent for the hoaxes (increasing in frequency), there would not be enough fodder for the national media to create an anti-gun narrative. In Orwells 1984, the government controlled the range of thought by limiting vocabulary; today, the American government eliminates certain thoughts by associating them with the last fake shooter. People are left with the remaining viewpoints that have not been eliminated. It is guilt by artificial association. The fake motives of fake perpetrators of fake tragedies provide the government with REAL justification to REALLY target REAL and innocent people, here and abroad. Lets run through some recent examples: 1) The supposed Oregon Shooter, Chris Harper Mercer, is said to have had Sandy Hook hoax videos on his MySpace page. Translation: anybody who expresses interest in these staged shootings must be the next shooter! This is the message the government-media complex wants to convey. Any glaring evidence associated with Sandy Hook being a complete hoax is thus quickly discredited (since they used another hoax shooting to associate such investigative instincts with murderous intent). Mercers mother is presented as having pro-gun social media posts for the very same reason: pro-gun equals parent of sociopath (when the opposite is true). This is the dumbed down twisted math used in New World Order propaganda. 2) Planned Parenthood shooting hoax was meant to associate homicidal violence with anti-abortion perspectives. If you happen to be against abortion, well then you must be the type who kills innocent people (I know the irony is heavy on that one). 3) The recent fake shootings in San Bernardino and Paris, France villainize Islamic people, implicate ISIS (or ISIL) and lay the groundwork for war with Syria and other countries in the Levant region. Doubtless these two recent shootings will result in some military action in the Middle East the same way that 9/11 was used to instigate an invasion of Afghanistan, the 7/7 bombings were used to justify Englands unpopular military involvement in Iraq, or the Gulf of Tonkin incident was orchestrated to justify a war in Vietnam. The desired reaction of the public to these incidents is decided before they are faked, then after the event the media gets to work cultivating this reaction from the public so that they will accept the solution the government is dying to roll out. The media is so effective as the mouthpiece for the government that the public will end up begging for the governments medicine. How do you spot when a shooting is real or when it is just another shooting hoax? The following are some tell-tale anomalies common to staged shooting hoax events: 1) FAKE CRYING FROM CRISIS ACTORS: People deal with grief in various different ways. If family members of people in danger were not crying at all, that would be COMPLETELY understandable. On the other hand, these fake shootings display crisis actors who FAKE CRYING, making the sounds and movements of a person crying, only without the tears. Any police detective worth his salt would take note of something like this suspicious behavior. Figure 1: Wiping Away Imaginary Tears In San Bernardino, California Olivia Navaro waits for her daughter and wipes away fake tears from dry eyes. 2) LACK OF PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE: We saw that with the Oregon Shooting, cell phones were confiscated from the students of Umpqua which is why we have yet to see pictures or video coming from the students there. However, we should at least see official photos from law enforcement, shouldnt we!? We are all familiar with crime scene images with quarters or dollar bills laid down for size perspective (when CSI folks are short on official size rulers) and gettingmeticulous photos of every bullet, every victim and any other item that might turn out to be remotely important. But where is all of this with the Oregon Shooting? Originally the shooters of the San Bernardino Hoax were supposed to have had GoPro cameras, thereby capturing the gruesome affair on video. I even found myself wondering if actual hard evidence was going to come out on this shooting (after all eventually an actual unplanned real shooting will take place). However, this became yet another part of the every changing story that even the news media had to admit was untrue. In fact the only actual video footage of anything even close to the actual event in San Bernardino we could find was the following: http://www.jeranism.com/#brid_cp_Brid_49262352662189279 This video taken by a person in the San Bernardino recreation center did manage to leak online. It shows people being lead out of the facility with their hands above their heads. This video is somewhat of an anomaly. It should be noted that it has not been broadcast on television and has repeatedly been taken down from YouTube (hence the jeranism.com link). That said this video doesnt show anyone actually injured, no one deceased, no blood or evidence of blood, no bullets or bullet holes keep in mind many of these things can be faked but in this case they arent even bothering. Similar to the Boston Bombings, the media and government can simply say someone is guilty and show some stills or footage that is not at all incriminating and the public will nod their head and yell go get em. Innocent until proven guilty has all but evaporated from the public consciousness. 3) LACK OF BLOOD: In the Oregon Shooting and San Bernardino Shooting Hoax, we saw people being carried out on gurneys, but no evidence of blood. Blood is somewhat hard to fake: it gushes, it grows, it makes puddles. In time it coagulates and changes color. Blood that is shiny initially quickly becomes dull. In the Recent Paris shooting, one of the shooters was supposedly shot to death, but did not bleed. At all. See for yourself this striking direct evidence that the Paris Shooting is a complete hoax (footage is voiced over by the always-colorful Redsilverj): https://vid.me/YZaw 4) LACK OF DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE: This will become more apparent as the weeks / months / years wear on. We saw in the years after Sandy Hook, the death certificates of the victims, the supposed shooter, even his mother (who supposedly was murdered a day before the shooting), have all been suppressed (or simply dont exist). NEVER SEEN! Not to mention the 911 calls and autopsy reports. To this day, the number of people murdered in Newtown, Connecticut is officially ZERO (according to FBI statistics). 5) TIES TO THE MILITARY: In the Oregon Shooting the shooter (Chris Mercer) had supposedly been honorably discharged from the Army. Chris Mintz, the famous million-dollar-fake-shooting-victim was on leave from the Army. In San Bernardino one of the supposed shooters brothers was in the military. This may sound like a reasonable expectation; a certain portion of the overall population IS in the military after all. And maybe it stands to reason that ex-military personnel would be more likely to shoot a bunch of people randomly (especially if you lean left). However, if in San Bernardino the male shooter is supposed to have been some Islamic extremist, isnt it somewhat odd that his brother is a member of the American military? 6) EERILY SIMILAR SIMULTANEOUS DRILLS: At the same time as the San Bernardino Shooting was supposed to have been taking place, there was a SWAT team that was running active shooter drills nearby the San Bernardino community center (where the shooting was staged). In fact, this was the reason given for their quick arrival (making this part of the official story). In Oregon the Principal of the Umpqua Community College claimed they had an active shooter drill a week prior to the shooting. In April and May of 2015, in Roseburg, Oregon, the Douglas County Emergency Management team hosted several drills with innocuous sounding names like Intermediate Incident for Expanding Incidents and Command System 400 for Advanced. These smaller drills are reminiscent of the much larger exercise referred to as Abel Danger during 9/11 which was nearly identical to the 911 hijacked plane scenario that we saw play out. Whats It Mean? Obviously no amount of snarky TV ads was going to turn America against guns. Anti-gun staged events are needed so that the government-media complex has an excuse to dominate news cycle after news cycle. These staged shooting productions would get a film director permanently banished from Hollywood but they are good enough when you have the news media presstitutes at your disposal. This article first appeared at James F. Tracys Memoryholeblog.com Memory Hole Editors Note: Authors Niles and Frasier Mercado will be guests on next weeks Real Politik, airing Monday at 3:00PM EST on Truth Frequency Radio and archived here. Niles Mercado has about two decades of experience consulting for various government agencies including the Air Force and the Department of Justice. Mercado has published the following books about conspiracies of various flavors: When Prosecutors Attack, Bush Killing Reagan, and Oregon Shooting: Just Another C.I.A. False Flag. To maintain his privacy and his familys safety he has chosen to write this volume using the pen name Niles Mercado; in light of the facts laid out here in this volume can you really blame him? Frasier Mercado has produced (and gained financing for) multiple independent Hollywood films (under his real name) including multi-million dollar productions starring Ashton Kutcher, Jason Statham, and Mickey Rourke. Frasier uses his extensive Hollywood experience faking blood, wounds, gunshots, and explosions to spot all the tell-tale signs of a staged event and has teamed up with his brother Niles in the writing of Bush Killing Reagan and Oregon Shooting Just Another C.I.A. False Flag. There will not be any gun confiscation!!!! elite scum like holder employed by my tax dollars makes me wanna puke. Great article, Niles and Frasier. Is that your only argument- calling people names? I was highly skeptical of it too because were all preprogrammed to reject it as being ridiculous. You really should look at the arguments/evidence for a flat earth. I havent decided yet but am highly curious now. He that answereth a matter before he heareth it, it is folly and shame unto him (Proverbs 18:13). Seriously? If you look out to sea with a good telescope at a distant ship, then you will notice the lower half of the ship is obscured by the curvature of the ocean. Also, if the Earth was flat, then you would be able to see the land on the other side of the ocean with a telescope. And, if you have ever spoken on the telephone to a person on the other side of the planet, and they told you it was the middle of the night over there, but for you it is the middle of the day that would not happen if the world was flat. Questioning everything is good, but sometimes the answer is so obvious that you can probably move on. Actually some of those points have been address by those who believe in a flat earth. From what Im gathering from their model the sun still makes a circuit around the flat plane. Ill look into it though. Not convinced yet but am open. I know the moon landing footage was a hoax. Its not acceptable to say that you have another explanation, if that explanation is it works by magic because that doesnt compete with an explanation that you can observe yourself, which follows exactly the currently understood laws of physics. And you are probably wrong about the moon landing. I honestly have been looking into it a whole lot. I had to think twice about a few points flat earthers bring up, but none of it holds water when truly scrutinized (kinda the way they think a sphere earth wouldnt hold water) The same goons that perceive, and are triggered by micro-aggressions, will not acknowledge the micro-expressions of duping delight. Isaiah 2: I watched Flat Earth 101 but not the Dummies version. Well, do yourself a favor. Its hilarious 