Constitution Con? 11 Hidden FactsSusan Boskey The problems Americans face today go way back to the founding of the United States. Yet, text-book pride in the Founding Fathers and the inviolate sacredness of the Constitution reinforce an impenetrable firewall behind which Americans are blinded. Quick-fixes are not cutting it. We need long-lasting solutions of substance; the root-cause of any problem must be uncovered and analyzed first. Here are 11 hidden facts about the U.S. Constitution most people probably never learned. 2. The Founding Fathers needed permission from the Congress of the Confederation, the powers that be of that day in order to hold the 1787 Philadelphia constitutional convention. On February 21, 1787, the Congress of the Confederation delivered a resolution authorizing a Philadelphia constitutional convention but with an important limitation: for the sole and express purpose of revising the Articles of Confederation and reporting to Congress and the several legislatures. 3. Prior to the Philadelphia constitutional convention, Founding Fathers wrote and distributed approximately 85 Federalist Papers to extol the virtues of an entirely new, second constitution for the people of America. By doing this, they hoped to reverse the prevailing negative public opinion and increase the publics confidence in such a plan. To help them, Founding Fathers hid behind a pseudonym when writing their Federalist Papers; each was signed as Publius, meaning friend of the people (or public). 5. Founding Father, George Washington, was aware of and acknowledged the concerns regarding the conventions potential illegality for the reasons stated, but did not want to discuss it. Instead, he asserted that holding the Philadelphia constitutional convention was worth the risk when he said: 6. The Philadelphia constitutional convention was held May into September 1787 with its outcome being that of the Founding Fathers exceeding the authority given them. Instead of only revising the Articles of Confederation they went ahead to create an entirely new constitution. As the prospect of a new constitution had drawn more certain at the convention, arguments began over how to get it ratified. Having so far succeeded at rallying the people to accept this second constitution by going over the heads of the state legislatures and directly to the people via the Federalist Papers, the Founding Fathers were confident they could also get a speedy ratification by the states. 7. As the Founding Fathers proceeded towards ratification of their new constitution, they denied having had any association with the Congress of the Confederation in utter defiance of the resolution of limited scope granted them. Gouverneur Morris reported that their constitutional convention was unknown to the Confederation. Gouverneur Morris said: 9. This new Constitution, however, per the Articles of Confederation, had not been created by mutual consent and therefore could not lawfully replace the Articles of Confederation. 10. The Constitution of the United States, signed September 17, 1787, was deemed ratified June 21, 1788 by only nine states instead of the unanimous ratification of all 13 states required by the Articles of Confederation. Thereafter, a new, centralized U.S. Government was formed, disregarding the original, decentralized American jurisdiction of state legislatures established soon after the American Revolution. 11. Also in June of 1788 at the Virginia Conference, orator and Anti-Federalist, Patrick Henry, exposed the political tactics of propaganda he believed the Federalists had used to win over the public. The Framers had pandered to the people in order to get their way, he said, by convincing the people, that under a new constitution, democracy would mean the government belonged to them. Henry also exposed the deception when Framers used the phrase, We, the people in the preamble to the Constitution. As the saying goes, the rest is history. The Constitution of 1787 and the U.S. Government it formed was an illegitimate (unauthorized) takeover of the original American jurisdiction. One (of many) proofs is that nowhere since have the Articles of Confederation been lawfully repealed in writing. The outcome? Americans who no longer suffer as indentured-servant subjects of the British monarchy now suffer as indentured-servant subjects of a United States beholden to an obscured corporate-banking cartel. Its just a newfangled monarchy centuries in the making and thanks to the Constitution con. The good news is that the first constitution, the Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union, still stands. Now its up to everyone else to confirm if what I have said here is fact or fiction. Please, by all means, prove me wrong. If it is fact, what then might be the personal implications going forward? What might be the next steps for American free inhabitants to take? The prospects are actually very encouraging. Recently From Susan Boskey: Susan Boskey, freelance researcher and writer, is author of the book, The Quality Life Plan: 7 Steps to Uncommon Financial Securitywww.AlternativeFinancialNow.com and more recently helped bring to market the book, Beyond the National Myth: waking up in the land of the free www.nationalmyth.org The Articles of Confederation IS the legitimate Constitution..it always will be and it is the only one that exists lawfully. The rest was a usurpation, after usurpation after usurpation..to bring us to a totalitarian One World Government. The Freemasons knew this quite well. Patrick Henry was a very smart man. And one that I to this day respect like no other. Give me LIBERTY.or GIVE ME DEATH !!! The original ORGANIC or FIRST Constitution was the Articles of Confederation, NOT the Freemasonic Usurpation.,that is where we began to go off the rails. Wrongwhat it shows you that that was the plan of the Freemasons all along..The Articles of Confederation IS our Constitution. And if your indoctrination is so correct, then why is there a Marxist in the White House and why did EVERYTHING Cornwallis say come exactly true? Wake up from your slumberstand for the real ConstitutionThe ARTICLES of CONFEDERATION Your opinion is short sighted and naive Those who fail to learn the lessons of history are doomed to repeat it. This author is absolutely correct. And if EVERYONE was made aware at who and how.then what and when would become crystal clear DEATH to the IMF, to Rothschild Usury and their criminal Banking cartel..and re-establishment of morality and of the family.instead of the cultural Marxist brought to us by the best the Freemasons had to offerCornwallis ttold us all the truth and if every man and woman who were responsible enough to understand what he said knew what he said we could stand UNITED in truth rather than UNITED IN IGNORANCE. Can you defend that position with facts ? NO That is Talmudic law you are referring to that has overtaken the actual rule of law which states IT CAN NOT BE CHANGED.. so Judicial selfnewss who made a decision 30 years ago.just because they got away with it does not a lawful precedent make. If you believe that then why do we have a Marxist in the White House and politicians who can break the law at will and never be punished.. naive and indoctrinated is what you are..Our Republic was long overthrown. Its time to get it back 