News Services Fake Dorner Manifesto, Quick-Shooting Police Mistake Little Women for a Big ManRuth Hull Ask Maggie Carranza and Emma Hernandez, both of whom were mistaken for Chris Dorner and shot by the police. Neither were armed. It didnt matter than Emma was 71 and a much smaller build than a big muscular guy. The police have made it clear that it is shoot to kill and shooting the wrong people is preferable to shooting nobody at all. Police corruption is a real problem in the Southland and this real problem is brought out in Chris Dorners manifesto. Im talking about the real manifesto and not the fake one you saw on Drudge, CNN, CounterPunch or a number of other sites that put ratings above truth and human life. For the real version, check out the articles at OEN and Facebook by former six term Congresswoman and American hero Cynthia McKinney who was alerted to the plight of Chris Dorner by Michael Rupperrt a former LAPD officer who is an expert on corruption within that department. The fake additions/changes to the manifesto presented by the mainstream media to garner higher ratings dont even match the writing style or educational level of the rest of the manifesto and are clearly fake additions/chances. They are clearly put in there by someone with a political agenda, who is using an unfortunate situation to push for legislation. Former LAPD Officer Dorner was concerned about corruption, not politics. He was writing about his personal observations, experiences and anger at the local authorities. The fake changes/additions are clearly not written by Dorner. While the real manifesto names some potentially corrupt officers and chiefs, politicians are left out of the mix and so are their wives. Chris Dorner was too busy writing about police corruption to discuss Washington politicos and legislation. After you ask the LAPD to stop shooting people, I suggest you notify any media outlets distributing the false manifesto that you are cancelling your subscriptions to them and placing them in the yellow journalism round file. We do not know if Dorner is still alive or will live long enough to tell his story. If the police keep shooting people, there is a good chance he and others will not be able to say anything. In the Dorner case, it is interesting that those who most need to speak are dead or likely to die. With Dorner, the truth dies too. I present here the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution: Due process of law does not translate into getting splattered with bullets fired by cops shooting everyone who looks like a man or a woman. There is also a corresponding Due Process Clause in the 14th Amendment, through which most parts of the Bill of Rights (including the 5th and 6th Amendments) are applied to the state and local governments. The Sixth Amendment is also important: Is banning the press helicopters and simply shooting a man in the woods, law enforcements idea of a public and speedy trial by a jury of the mans peers? If you think the framers had something else in mind, the LAPD phone number is up above. Someone went to a lot of trouble to fake a manifesto. This leads to the question, What else did they fake? Did this man do anything other than blow the whistle on corrupt police practices? Once lies start, where do they end? If they start with a fake manifesto, do they go on to include falsely attributed killings? By releasing a fake version of the manifesto, the authorities and press have opened the door to wide speculation that this man may have been framed in every other way. Dorner may be as bad as they claim, but those who presented the fake manifesto have lost their credibility with respect to this particular suspect and maybe other suspects as well. In releasing the fake manifesto, somebody or somebodies are making a strong effort to turn public opinion against Dorner. Why such a strong effort? What is the real threat this man poses? Could this be just a man who came across some dangerous information? Lets look at the more authentic version of the manifesto to find out what is taking place on the LAPD and what they may want to hide. Wait a minute. So Dorner doesnt like violence against a potentially innocent suspect. It would be nice if more officers opposed police violence. Is he saying officers on the LAPD are racist? So Mark Fuhrman wasnt a fantasy conjured up by OJ? And are these same racist officers now planning to kill Dorner, a Black man? There couldnt be racism involved in this armed lynching of a Black man, could there? More witnessed misconduct. I wonder if the 70-something woman has filed suit against the LAPD. or when the other guys on your watch beat a transient nearly to death Couldnt those officers get the death penalty if Dorner testifies? Does that make it self-defense to kill Dorner, the witness? Ive heard many officers who state they see dead victims as ATVs, Waverunners, RVs and new clothes for their kids. Nice guys. The last part of the manifesto makes it clear that he respects the U.S. Government. Much of the attack rhetoric towards the end with respect to corrupt cops could be interpreted in different ways, such a plan for cyber attacks, discouraging anyone from helping save the lives of rogue officers when they get into trouble, fighting those who are attacking innocent suspects, starting a revolt against the police or just plain fierce rhetoric to discourage the police from coming after him. We also cannot be certain that Dorner killed anyone. If the police could mistake a 71-year-old woman for Dorner, maybe it was a 71-year-old woman who committed the murders with which they are crediting him, or maybe those who were killed were blowing the whistle like Dorner If the LAPD doesnt know the difference between a man and a woman, who else might they mistake for Dorner? What if Dorner showed up on the scene of the other killings to try to save the decedents but was too late? Maybe they want to kill Dorner so he wont tell what really happened to those people. These are questions for a jury, that thing mentioned in the Sixth Amendment. We do not know if Chris Dorner is crazy, a really bad guy, or as some have claimed, a hero. What we do know is that if we believe in America, then it is up to us to make sure that this man has his day in court. Im an American. Are you? Maybe its time we showed the world what it means to be an American. So join your fellow Americans in calling the LAPD and demanding they bring Dorner in alive and STOP SHOOTING WOMEN and everyone else for that matter. In closing, I refer everyone to the Samuel L Jackson, Kevin Spacey movie The Negotiator, wherein an honest police officer went rogue to prove his innocence after he had uncovered corruption and been framed. In his manifesto, Chris Dorner makes it clear he also wants to prove his innocence. Ruth Hull is an activist and writer whose career has included work as a criminal defense attorney, a licensed private investigator, and an educator. 