The Prince and the Pedophile: Charles Connections to Pedophilia NetworksBrandon Turbeville At least, more questions should be emerging. Unfortunately, however, the British mainstream media is deeming Prince Charles and the rest of his ilk in positions of power and perceived genetic royalty as if they are beyond reproach. This approach is typical and to be expected, yet it is also highly ironic considering the fact that such is the same position the mainstream media took with the allegations against Jimmy Savile for so many years. As a result of the Savile affair, mainstream outlets, particularly the BBC, now have a lot of egg on their faces in the areas of credibility and respect.In short, any connections placing Prince Charles in an uncompromising position regarding his connections with Savile or his potential for sharing a penchant for unnatural relationships with children is being completely ignored if not officially covered up. Although Prince Charles friendship with Jimmy Savile, allegedly begun when the two met in the 1970s during the course of working with childrens wheelchair sports charities, is now well-known, the extent to which the Prince and the Pedophile were connected appears to go much deeper than the mainstream media reports let on. Of course, the two having come in contact at a charity event for the disabled is not too far-fetched, even if it is being reported by corporate outlets. After all, using childrens charities as a hunting ground and a cover for his true motives was a notorious method used by Savile who actually lived in childrens homes and hospitals so as to be closer to his victims. This method is by no means specific to Savile, however, as many other sexual predators and pedophiles know exactly what areas of society to be involved in and what careers to pursue in order to gain access to their victims. Jerry Sandusky stands as a perfect example. Clarence House, Prince Charles spokesman, declined comment on much of the relationship between Savile and Charles, only claiming that the relationship was mostly a result of their shared interest in supporting disability charities. Supporting charities, indeed. Of course, Savile was doing much more than supporting disability charities. That is, unless one places serial child rape in a much different category than the average person might. Indeed, one would not be judged out of place to question whether or not untold numbers of sexually assaulted children thoroughly cancels out any financial support that may have been given in the past. Apparently, in the view of British royalty, it does not. In fact, child molester Savile has enjoyed an unbelievable level of access to the Royal Family for the past 40 years. For instance, in the late 1980s, Savile was said to have acted as a type of marriage counselor between Charles and Diana, visiting their residence several times. At these visits, Dickie Arbiter, who took care of media relations for the Prince and Princess between 1988 and 2000 stated that, at these visits, Saviles behavior was uncouth to say the very least. Arbiter stated, He would walk into the office and do the rounds of the young ladies taking their hands and rubbing his lips all the way up their arms if they were wearing short sleeves. If it was summer [and their arms were bare] his bottom lip would curl out and he would run it up their arms. This was at St Jamess Palace. The women were in their mid to late 20s doing typing and secretarial work. Not only that, but Savile was brought in to the private marital affairs of the Royals once again in order to help the Duchess of York, Sarah Ferguson, in matters which were not disclosed to the public. Savile later claimed he was brought in to help Fergie keep her profile down. Obviously, the relationship forged between Charles and Savile went far beyond two men who merely performed charity work for the same organizations. This can be evidenced by the fact that, in 1990, Charles even consulted Savile for advice on the appointment of a senior aide for himself and Princess Diana. The relationship between Charles and Savile, particularly Saviles access to the Royal Familys affairs and the respect which was afforded Savile in this regard, has confused many onlookers. After all, Savile was nothing more than a BBC presenter and disc jockey who was well past his prime. Not to mention the fact that Savile was well known as an uncontrollable freak, although many were under the impression that Saviles television persona was merely part of his schtick. Yet the clues to the Princes friendship with the Pedophile might have more to do with similar interests in entertainment than a mere happenstance relationship. Although the evidence which connects Prince Charles to pedophilia is nowhere near as documented as that of Jimmy Savile, a trail of information certainly seems to be leading in that direction. At this point, it should be mentioned that, although the official line is that Savile and Charles met in the 1970s as part of the coincidence of mutual charity work, Savile himself has stated that he was friends with the Royal family for a million years. In fact, it was reported that Savile actually stated he was introduced to the Royals in 1966 by Lord Mountbatten, a known pedophile and sexual pervert. In addition to Mountbatten, however, Greg Hallett, in his book Hitler Was A British Agent, also names Prince Philip as a pedophile.In reference to how he became introduced and ingratiated with the Royal family, Savile stated, Coming from Lord Louis, who was the favourite uncle of Prince Philip, that was quite something. So obviously I hooked up with the Prince what was good enough for Lord Louis was good enough for him. So, already, we have Savile, a notorious pedophile linked to other individuals of the Royal Family named as pedophiles as well. Prince Philip, of course, is Prince Charles father. Lord Mountbatten is largely considered Charles mentor. Savile was indeed close to British Royals as well as other elites for many years. It seems his qualification for such high connections were mainly due to his ability to obtain children for the twisted appetites of those considered beyond reproach for the mainstream media and, unfortunately, the general public. Savile himself seemed to hint at this possibility in an interview conducted with Esquire where he stated, The thing about me is I get things done and I work deep cover. Saviles ridiculous television show (created for the sole purpose of enhancing his access to children) was thus appropriately named, Jimll Fix It. Unfortunately, the vast majority of the public were completely unaware as to what he was fixing and who he was fixing it for. Essentially, it is clear that Jimmy Savile was a procurer of children not only for himself but also for wealthy pedophiles all across the world, particularly in Britain. Even Saviles own nephew has recently gone public with information tying Savile to a network of pedophiles and sick sexual parties where children were repeatedly raped. Guy Marsden, Saviles nephew, also stated that the parties were attended by household names in show business. However, as is being widely reported in the news, Saviles escapades of pedophilia were by no means limited to parties with the elite of entertainment. Many of his attacks on children took place in the halls of the hospitals and charities he helped fund and operate, even residing in his own personal room at two of these institutions. At this point, it is worth noting that Savile and Prince Charles are open supporters of the same charities. Apparently, Prince Charles and the Pedophile did have some similar tastes, some of which were even reported by the mainstream media. In 1999, after the Prince accepted Saviles invitation to a private meal at Saviles home in Glencoe, Scotland, Savile had arranged for three women to parade around dressed in pinafores, a type of dress without sleeves and an open back that is often worn over other dresses. Interestingly enough, pinafores were often worn by children. After the dinner, Charles wrote Savile a Christmas Card with a note that read, Jimmy, with affectionate greetings from Charles. Give my love to your ladies in Scotland. Of course, the mainstream is certain that Charles is referring to the local women brought in for the Royal entertainment. However, unless the hired help made an exceptional impression upon the mind of Charles, one must wonder whether or not these particular ladies are the ladies to which Charles is referring in his Christmas note. After all, Saviles Scottish cottage was also the scene of much child abuse as well. Later, Charles sent Savile a box of cigars and a pair of gold cufflinks on his 80th birthday along with another note that cryptically read, Nobody will ever know what you have done for this country Jimmy. This is to go some way in thanking you for that. Fortunately, many are now aware of what Jimmy has done for his country. Clearly, it would be best if they are given the full story along with it. This is not likely to happen, however, as global pedophile rings are generally made up of some of the most elite individuals the world over. This is particularly relevant when it comes to any questions regarding the behavior of the Royal Prince. At any moment when there is a chance that information might be leaked that would be damaging to the reputation of genetic royalty, the documents are sealed, the whistleblowers are dealt with, and the controversy covered up. Some have even speculated that Princess Diana sealed her own fate after threatening to reveal networks of pedophilia within the Royal family. Indeed, Diana did speak of dark forces and members of an organization that were monitoring her shortly before her death. For instance, when it appeared that the so-called Black Spider Memos, a series of letters written by Charles to government ministers, would damage the perception of Charles impartiality if he were to become king, then memos were immediately blocked by the British government. Indeed, it would be extremely interesting to see the contents of the letters, since, in reality, the impartiality of the king is truly irrelevant in the grand scheme of British society and government. What is particularly interesting is that the letters are being blocked from release now, as the biggest pedophilia scandal in British history is unfolding specifically, at a time when one of the main focal points of the scandal, Jimmy Savile, was a close friend of the Prince. Even more so, it comes at a time when British government officials are also being implicated in pedophilia networks. For those who may still be under the impression that pedophilia is a crime beyond the capabilities of British politicians, take a look at this partial compilation of British politicians convicted of pedophilia in recent years. But, while the connections between Prince Charles and the Pedophile Jimmy Savile are themselves enough to make one wonder, the fact is that Savile is not the only relationship with a potential pedophile that Charles has maintained. As reported by the Digital Journal, the Right Reverend Peter Ball is the most senior member of the Church of England to be arrested for offenses against children. Ball was arrested on eight suspected cases of abuse against boys and young men ranging from ages 12 to 20 during the 1980s to 1990s. Ball, who was the former Bishop of Gloucester, resigned in 1993 after he was served with a police caution for committing an act of gross indecency against a teenager. Upon his resignation, Ball retired to Manor Lodge, a wisteria-clad property owned by the Duchy of Cornwall. Manor Lodge is a property of the Princes Duchy of Cornwall. In reference to his new living arrangements, Ball stated, He (Prince Charles) has been wonderfully kind and allowed me to have a duchy house. The prince is a loyal friend. I have immense admiration for him, he has been through horrific times and is a great person. Considering the connections and personal friendships maintained by Prince Charles, one must question whether or not Charles himself has had some experience in the underworld of pedophilia. At the very least, the Prince is the absolute worst judge of character who ever lived. What is also very interesting regarding the people named in these child sex scandals and the scope of the scandals themselves, is that the individuals who have been trying their best to bring this information to light have been ignored and derided for years on end. This has been the case whether the individuals were whistleblowers, researchers, or even victims themselves. For instance, while much of mainstream Britain has had quite a time laughing at David Icke, suddenly his claims do not seem so fantastic and funny after all. Indeed, it was Icke who mentioned the global cabal of pedophiles and even many of the participants in them by name many years ago. While his voice was scarcely heard above the laughter at the time, he is, at the very least, on the record as having exposed these networks early on. As for Ickes remarks regarding the scandal today, he had this to say on November 7, 2012. This guy, William Hague, the foreign Secretary, needs to be questioned on why that Welsh inquiry into the massive pedophilia in Welsh childrens homes was given the brief that it did and therefore stopped these kids from talking about what happened to them. And this is the big thing. If the police investigation does not knock on the door of Buckingham Palace over this whole Savile [case] and the wider implications that have followed then its a cover up. Because the British Royal family are fundamentally involved in this right to the top. Right up to the people like Prince Philip and all these other people . . . . . This man [Savile] was an aging sleazy disc jockey, right? And he had complete access to the British Royal family AND they used him as an official go-between [with] Prince Charles and Princess Diana when they were falling out in their marriage. And now its come out this week that he was advising Prince Charles on aids to employ. Why is this man so close or was so close to the British Royal Family? The answer to that will bring the British Royal family down. Considering Ickes accuracy in terms of information on this particular issue, perhaps it would be wise if those who heard him speak years ago might take him a little more serious the second time around. RELATED ACTIVIST POST ARTICLE: Read other articles by Brandon Turbeville here. Brandon Turbeville is an author out of Florence, South Carolina. He has a Bachelors Degree from Francis Marion University and is the author of three books, Codex Alimentarius The End of Health Freedom, 7 Real Conspiracies, and Five Sense Solutionsand Dispatches From a Dissident.Turbeville has published over 175 articles dealing on a wide variety of subjects including health, economics, government corruption, and civil liberties. Brandon Turbevilles podcast Truth on The Tracks can be found every Monday night 9 pm EST at UCYTV. He is available for radio and TV interviews. Please contact activistpost (at) gmail.com. How many times do these rumors have to surface before someone pays attention and does something about it? You either think this is okay or you dont. I would quite frankly kill someone for messing with one of my kids. These stories keep coming back and coming back. I have no doubt at this point in time these stories are not stories at all but the truth. Theyve come up too many times for it to just be someone out trying to make a name for themselves. I believe this woman. I put HUGE blame on the The media is a for ignoring and covering up for these sleazebags. This is not just the British Royal Family, its the Catholic church and numerous other world leaders/elected officials all across the globe. The Lord will deal with all of this since it appears we dont have the backbone or the moral fiber left in us to protect our kids from these monsters. What dead child? WTF are you talking about? Im not pro royalty but theres no way Charles is a paedo. And I doubt very much he took any advice or had any friendship with a scummy chav like jimmy savile. I expect he was polite and made conversation as you do but nothing more. He only got the Sir because he was a long term charity working celebthat will be it. Upper classes dont hang out with chavsjust doesnt happen..ever. If they had killed a teenager, which is an awful thing to suggest Im pretty sure they wouldnt bury the corpse on their estaterolls eyes. oh why not ? They have control of that estate. Thats a good reason why they control the estate. During the 70s, a relative a prominent business man in London with an office in the City told us at a family get-together that he had been invited to an all-male (but not Masonic) business dinner in London. The after-dinner entertainment was a film-show of adult males sexually abusing young boys. He expressed horror at what he was watching and was told by the host that the children love it and that they were always given treats afterwards. The filming, he was told ,had been done at a party and several of the abusers were recognisable as guests at the very dinner party he was attending that night. The next day our relative telephoned a colleague who had been at the dinner party and expressed his shock at what he had seen. He said he was going to the police about it and asked his colleague if he would collaborate what they had seen. The reply was that he, too, was shocked and disgusted that they had been shown this film, and not least that they had been invited to partake in the next childrens party, but his own enquiries had warned him that to make a complaint to the police would be a waste of time and that if they went to the press they would be ruined. There are Police officers at the highest level that are involved in these vile goings-on and they would stop you in your tracks., he was told. Also, he was told, the Press keep silent about it because the world is not ready to believe these things and it would ruin the Establishment in this Country. Our relative died some years ago, but when I worked as a legal secretary there were cases in which prosecutions were sought against Paedophiles but somehow never reached the courts. I think we were generally very ignorant of the detail of what was happening and also very ignorant of the consequences of the terrible suffering of the victims. I am thankful that the Savile case breached the wall of silence purely because of the enormous number of testimonies that all tallied. There is no going back now the floodgates have opened and one might hope that this Country, at least, might be a safer place for children today. I am a bit concerned about the claim that the Royal Family are included in a film of Savile s raping children. Where is the evidence? A description of the whole of the Royal family as being a bunch of Satanist scum is verging on hysterical madness and as such detracts from the real business of tracking down and exposing these vile perpetrators whoever they are. More fact and less hyperbole please! not for long Haut de la Garrene, Jersey. Which is funny, coz Jersey isnt UK, or EU. Its a Crown Protecterate owned entirely by the Royal Family. Its also the largest off-shore tax haven on earth, its the island from which Ted Heath is said to have taken young boys procured by jimmy savile from Haut de la Garrene on pleasure trips on his yacht. Hundreds of kids went missing from Haut de la Garrene over decades, but the findings of an effort excavate the property in search of bodies were covered up. Bodies thrown overboard from a yacht on the French side of the channel might be even less likely to ever show up! Savile 