Geoengineered Snow Storms Wreaking Havoc around the GlobeDane Wigington, Contributor If the Chinese government can routinely create snow storms out of what should have been a rain event, how much more advanced must our government be at this same process? Many of the snow events occurring around the US, even at this time of year, are amazingly still occurring at above freezing temperatures. Some are at temperatures of 10 degrees or more above freezing. How is this possible? Have the laws of physics changed? First, because they can. Why would the global power elite detonate over 1800 nuclear bombs? Because there is no one to stop these experiments. Because there is no regulation whatsoever of the ongoing global geoengineering programs, though many outlines for such governance exist as if these programs are not yet a reality. There are likely other straightforward reasons. Sixty years of global climate experimentation have done horrific damage to the global climate system. The planet is warming; it would appear in large part due to the damage done by the ongoing geoengineering programs. Massive ozone holes and methane releases are occurring. Now it appears that those at the helm of the global spraying programs are trying to cover up the damage that has been done from the spraying by spraying yet more, and probably with an ever growing list of toxic elements. Isnt this the true definition of insanity? Doing the same thing on an ever bigger scale and expecting a different result? Though all available data makes clear that stratospheric aerosol geoengineering (SAG) can and does cool large regions temporarily, it comes at the cost of a worsened overall warming to the planet. NASAs own data confirms this. What Are The Consequences? The problems that arise when ice nucleation is imposed on the atmosphere are many. Some consequences we can not yet know for sure, but what we do know is bad enough. First, the entire hydrological cycle is disrupted and, in general, greatly reduced. This means less precipitation in any form, rain or snow. Though the Weather Channel is doing their absolute best to rah rah all the snow falling in various locations, the fact is there is a snow drought in the United States. Yes its falling, but there is not that much and its generally not that cold considering the time of year. The ice nucleated snow storms create the illusion of a normal winter when in fact all available statistics paint a very different picture. As we get through winter and closer to spring, ice nucleated events will become much more obvious. Above freezing snow events will become more and more common. Still, it is important to remember that geoengineered snow storms can also be carried out under extreme cold scenarios. Whatever the initial air mass temperatures, the chemical nucleation mix appears to lower the surrounding temperatures much further. Snow from artificial ice nucleation at higher temperatures is almost always heavy wet snow. This is a newly introduced term pushed by the Weather Channel and other mainstream media sources. The snow that does fall is toxic. There are numerous lab tests to confirm that the same highly toxic heavy metals named as primary elements in geoengineering patents are being found in this artificially nucleated snow. This poisons the air, soils and waters. The effects on the Northern Boreal forests are already horrific. Trees are dying en masse and soil PH values are changing radically. The artificially nucleated snow can be incredibly dense and heavy, often causing major damage to trees and structures.Wind patterns and ocean currents are also being negatively effected by the ongoing spraying and manipulation of natural wind currents. (The HAARP ionosphere heater installations around the globe also appear to be routinely manipulating the jet stream) This in turn is releasing methane hydrate deposits which threatens all life on earth. (search geoengineering/methane release) Photosynthesis is also being radically reduced. Extremely expansive geoengineered cloud cover results from the particulate dispersement. This type of cloud cover is often in the form of a largely featureless overcast sky. What Is Such An Event Like Firsthand On 12/21/12 this author had to suffer through yet another ice nucleated snow storm in the woods of Northern California. In the days leading up to the storm, it was comical if not completely tragic watching the local TV weathermen trying to explain just how it was going to snow so much when only days earlier Redding, California was almost 75 degrees. They tried to explain how the 30 to 40 mile an hour winds from the storm would mysteriously die down only over the upper Sacramento Valley and thats when the snow would fall, even with temperatures in the upper 30s to low 40s. (Diminished wind is also a known consequence of atmospheric aerosol saturation/geoengineering spraying. ) As is now the rule, the approaching storm brought skies full of jet-dispersed geoengineering trails which covered the entire horizon in short order. A sickly colored light penetrated this toxic canopy from the early morning hours of 12/20. Natural clouds eventually drifted into view under the man-made cover story, but they did not have the usual majestic appearance as they were melted into engineered clouds above. The leading edge of almost all storms are sprayed heavily. This is the AR of the storm. The atmospheric river and is a stated area of preferred spraying by the geoengineers themselves. The usual effect of this is a day or so delay of the storm, and this case was no different. On 12/20 the local weathermen did their best to explain why the storm did not come in the day before as originally predicted. It slowed down they said. As the evening of 12/20 progressed, the 500 ft. snow level that was predicted for that afternoon did not happen. It seemed in this case the temps were so warm that the big chemical cool down took more effort, more spraying. It seemed the geoengineers might not pull it off, as by 11 pm it was still raining at the 2000+ foot level on the mountain top where I and my family live. It was still well above freezing. Waking up at 5 am, I could already see broken trees from the massively heavy concrete snow that had apparently started some hours earlier in the night, though the temperatures were still slightly above freezing. I quickly bundled up and went outside to beat the snow off the drooping limbs of countless trees. This is easier said than done in the case of such heavy wet snow. It sticks like glue to everything it hits, as it is in the process of melting even as it is still falling. It is not like the snow of my youth, fluffy powdery snow which easily came off the trees. There was, as predicted, no more wind. In the silence of the woods, jet after jet could be heard flying slow and low above the clouds. The snow kept falling. Into the night of 12/21, though soaked to the bone from the soggy snow, I kept up my attempt to save the trees on our mountain. As the night went on, a sound that is very painful to me could be heard in increasing frequency on distant ridges and in deep canyons; somewhere in the darkness, the sound of trees crackling and snapping, being crushed under the weight of the heavy wet snow. These are native trees. Trees that have adapted to the historical conditions in this region. I have been through snow events here that dropped twice the depth of snow with no damage, but this snow is different. Even the Canyon Live Oak, the strongest oak in the region, buckles under the weight and adhesion of this snow. It does not sloughoff the trees but only sticks and builds. Later in the night, the frequency of collapsing trees somewhere in the distant dark was almost overwhelming. The only other sound that broke the silence constantly was the continual parade of jets overhead in the clouds, so close and low during the storm. By morning, half of the 20-inch depth of cement snow had already melted. The temperatures were still in the upper 30s and the snow had stopped. Countless broken and uprooted trees lay on the forest floor. Why? For the moment, there are virtually no jets to be heard. None. Soon enough, they will no doubt return. What Can We Do Educate yourself on this most dire issue. Arm yourself with essential tools for educating others. It is far more productive to hand someone some credible information they can review at their leisure than to corner them with a rant that only puts up their defenses. Examples of information flyers can be found at geoengineeringwatch.org/ads. An extremely important tool to use with a flyer is a copy of Michael Murphys new documentary, Why In The World Are They Spraying which can be found at whyintheworldarethespraying.com. Once you own a copy, you can duplicate all you want at a very small cost. Stand up, make your voice heard by sharing credible data with all you know. Its now or never. http://www.ptodirect.com/Results/Patents?query=PN/3613992 http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/documents/artificial-snow-creation-method.pdf http://www.news.com.au/technology/chinese-scientists-create-second-artificial-snowstorm-in-beijing/story-e6frfro0-1225796559341 http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol17/iss1/art24/ http://www.politicsforum.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=50t=122657 http://news.stanford.edu/pr/2007/pr-slowwind-012407.html http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/htm/tests.html Dane Wigingtons background is in renewable energy, being formerly employed with Bechtel Power Corp. His personal off-grid residence was featured as the cover article on the worlds largest renewable energy magazine. Dane is also a land investor and preservationist, having set aside almost 2000 acres of key habitat area adjacent to Lake Shasta as wildlife preserve. Dane also maintains GeoEngineeringWatchwhere this article first appeared. 