Top 4 Fallacies of the Hijacked Environmental MovementBy Makia Freeman By continuing topush notions that carbon dioxide is a poison, thatglobal warming exists and mankind is responsible for it, that we need a worldwide carbon tax and that we requireAgenda 21-style global governance, these people are unknowingly promoting the New World Order program and unwittingly placing elite controllers in powerwho dontcare about the environment and viewit merely as a resource to be exploited. It has even gotten to the point where thoseresisting climate change (anotherRothschild-Rockefeller creation) are being treated like criminal extremists there have even been calls in the US by climate scientists for Obama to prosecute them! Welcome to Planet Earth. If your opinion diverges too much from the mainstream, you could get locked up for thinking wrongly. With the current focus being on the 2015 UNSummit, the hackneyed buzzword ofsustainabilityis being thrown around like theres no tomorrow. In this context, its worth revisiting how the environmental movement came to be so hijacked and co-opted. The basis for the hijacked environment movementlies with formerly secret military reports, and one of the elite Round Table groups that run the world: the Club of Rome.I wonder if those who believe in AGW (Anthropogenic Global Warming) or Manmade Global Warming have any ideathat the elite came up with the idea of using mankind itself as the global threat against which we are all supposed to gather behind a One World Government? The1966 Report from Iron Mountain was commissioned by JFK and considered by LBJ as too dangerous to reveal to the public at the time when it was completed. This excerptfrom it discusses how a Global Government could function without war, and suggests the threat could instead be environmental pollution: It may be, for instance, that gross pollution of the environment can eventually replace the possibility of mass destruction by nuclear weapons as the principal apparent threat to the survival of the species. Poisoning of the air, and of the principal sources of food and water supply, is already well advanced, and at first glance would seem promising in this respect; it constitutes a threat that can be dealt with only through social organization and political power. The Club of Rome is one of 6 groups that are close to the center of theRhodesian Round Table (ultimately funded by Rothschild) which also includes The Bilderberg Group, the CFR, the RIIA, the UN and The Trilateral Commission. TheClub of Romes1991 document entitled The First Global Revolution? contains thispassage: In searching for a common enemy against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill. In their totality and their interactions these phenomena do constitute a common threat which must be confronted by everyone together all these dangers are caused by human intervention in natural processes, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then is humanity itself. The current environmental movement we see today has been seeded, or at least hijacked, a long time ago. Lets take a look at the top 4 fallacies the NWO conspirators have managed to get naive greenies to believe. Lets start with the basics: carbon dioxide (CO2) is a nutrient, not a poison. We breathe out carbon dioxide every breath, but we also take some of it in on the inbreath. According to the IPCC (Interplanetary Panel on Climate Change), we are therefore poisoning ourselves every breath! Think about it if CO2 were really a poison, why does it help plants grow so much? Why is it a key part of the fundamental equation of biology: sugar + oxygen = carbon dioxide+ water + heat? How is it that those in the environmental movement are ignorant of basic biology? As the website PlantsNeedCO2.org states, the more CO2 around, the betterplants grow: In Idso and Idsos (1994) analysis of soil nutrient limitations, the percentage growth enhancement due to a 300-ppm rise in the airs CO2 content actually did exhibit a slight (but statistically non-significant) decline, dropping from 51% to 45% when nutrients went from non-growth-limiting to limiting in a group of 70 experiments. But when the atmospheric CO2 enrichment was 600 ppm, this slight negative trend reversed itself, going from a CO2-induced growth stimulation of 43% when nutrients were present in abundance to a 52% enhancement when their supply was sub-optimal. And for a 1200-ppm increase in atmospheric CO2, the percentage growth enhancement jumped from 60% when the soil nutrient supply was adequate to 207% when it was less-than-adequate. Its a simple equation: the more CO2 you have, the more the plants like it, and the faster they will grow. The demonization of carbon dioxide is not about helping the environment.The NWO idea has always been to attach the worsening condition of the environment to an individuals energy usage and even his or her breathing so as to introduce a carbon tax. TheGovernment literally wants to tax you for breathing for merely being alive! AGW or manmade global warming has been exposed as a giant scam. It still remains an open question whether the world is warming or cooling, given all the fakery and fudging of data, such as ClimateGate, where hackers found that scientists at the UKs East Anglia University had deliberately distorted the figures. (See the work of Ian Plimer, Christopher Monckton and others in exposing this.) That is why the term global warming got changed toclimate change this way, no matter what happens with the weather, the IPCC can say the climate is changing. Climate change is a slick truism you cant argue against it. Of course the climate is changing. When has it not changed? The great documentaryThe Great Global Warming Swindleyears ago exposed the lies behind the very political climate change agenda.More than1,000 dissenting scientistsfrom around the globe have challenged the manmade global warming claims made by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and shreddedits credibility. Further, climate change, whether we are causing it or not, is not necessarily bad; in some casesstudies havesuggested it is responsible for re-greening parts of the world and changing lives for the better. As pointed out above, all this focus on carbon is for one reason: taxation. The whole scheme to get people and corporations fixated on their carbon footprint rather than how much actual benefit or harm they are doing the environment is to pave the way for more taxation and centralization of power. To have a worldwide carbon tax, of course, you need a One World Government to enforce and collect it.The UN, ICLEI and its other subdivisions are constantly talking about global governance for this very reason. For further information on this topic, check out George Hunts work in exposing how EvelynRothschild and David Rockefeller were cooking up the cap-and-tradeschemein the 1980s. He was at some of the meetings where the carbon tax was being discussed! Mahatma Gandhi once said: Earth providesenoughto satisfy everymans need, butnoteverymans greed. There is no doubt that rising populations can put a strain on resources, yet where is the proof that the Earth cannot support 7 billion people? Or 9 billion people?Is it really population that is the problem here, or is it rather self-centered greed and destructive environmental practices and technologies? We can accept the worlds rising population not as a threatora reason to justify killing (which goes by the euphemism of depopulation), but rather as a challenge. It can propel us intoliving more from the heart, to having more compassion for those less well off than us, to doing a better job of sharing, of distributing resources equitably.It can stimulate usinto better modes of efficiency. Could the rising populationhelpa critical mass ofpeople awake to the truth of free energy, and the fact that free energy or over unity devices already exist which provide practically unlimited energy for free or very cheaply? It has been known in many countries for a long time that as you increase education, you decrease population, naturally. There is no need for stealth sterilization programs, introducing contraceptives through vaccines or other depopulation murder programs.When people gain a higher education, they organically choose to have fewer kids. If the conspirators really cared about the planets population, why not use their money to help everyone access better education? The answer is, of course, that they dont. Underpinning the propaganda of overpopulation is eugenics. Its the idea that some humans are superior to others, and that some humans dont deserve to be here.This is really the philosophical and spiritual basis of the hijacking. As they have confessed, the conspirators in their delusions (see Prince Philip above) view the rest of the populationas a virus that must be rid from the planet. Yet, the real virus is the fear mindset that runs the show in the brains of the elite controllers. The real problem with the environmentisnt climate change or carbon. Its that we as a collective species are trashing and degrading it. We are in serious danger of ruining ourenvironment to such an extent that it will no longer be able to support an oxygen-breathing species like ours.We spill oil in our oceans and rivers. We kill off species faster than we can even classify them. We makesubstances which dont biodegrade and end up in giant landfills. We cut down forests withouttaking enough care to replace them. We use an economic system which incentivizes planned obsolescence and economically encourages us to throw things away rather than repair them. We let maniacal men rule out-of-control Governments that spray toxic barium, aluminum and strontium chemtrailsall over the world and get away with it. What does any of this have to do with climate change or carbon? These 2 terms are a huge distraction and a deliberate way to trick people who genuinely care for the environment. Do you deeply care for the environment? Great! Then do your research first before joining any protests.Oppose fracking, GMOs, corporate welfare to military companies (the Pentagon is the biggest polluter on planet) andgeoengineering, which is spraying poison all over the world.Last year, in September 2014, around 400,000 peopleturned upin New York for the Peoples Climate March but what is the point of this activism if it gets diverted? As David Icke says, we need streetwise spirituality. We need to have our hearts in the right places, but also put our thinking caps on, otherwise we will easily by led astray by tricksters. Only once the leaders of the environmental movement have their hearts and brains in alignment can we effect real change on the ecosystems of Planet Earth. Additional images available at original source: http://freedom-articles.toolsforfreedom.com/hijacked-environmental-movement/ Sources: ***** Image Credit Want the latest commentaryand analysis on Conspiracy, Natural Health, Sovereignty, Consciousness and more? Sign up forfree blog updates! Makia Freeman is the editor of alternative news / independent media siteThe Freedom Articlesand senior researcher atToolsForFreedom.com,writing on many aspects of truth and freedom, from exposing aspects of the global conspiracy to suggesting solutions for how humanity can create a new system of peace and abundance. [Emphasis added]: We let maniacal men rule out-of-control Governments that spray toxic barium, aluminum and strontium chemtrails all over the world and get away with it. Well I am not a scientist but I am thinking that melting plastic would reduce it back to oil this seems reasonable (possible) to me. In responce to the absurdity of this post that can only disuss falacious talking points with no knowledge of the subject matter I quote Twain Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience. climate chaos or weather manipulation one and the same. The same can be said about believing the lies of the anti-fossil fuel propagandists. Nobody is saying that environmentalists are stupid, but they do have an agenda. I for one resent being controlled by that agenda. The club of Rome is real, and some very big players are involved, including Al Gore. Why do you think the climate change agenda is so important to him? The CO2 as poison argument is a straw man; no environmentalists ever claimed this was the problem with doubling CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere via industrial pollution (but try beathing air with just a few percent of CO2 and see how you fare!). As for Climategate, this involved the work of a handful of researchers involved in computer modelling tens of thousands of papers have been published in REPUTABLE publications about the reality of global warming (not climate change, a term introduced by publicists for Big Oil to distract and confuse the public btw), while only a handful of papers claim anthopogenic heating isnt happening. selfnewss work against ecosystem-wrecking industries they dont do their dirty work for them! 