Freedom in America: Rest in PeaceStephen Lendman There is no greater tyranny than that which is perpetrated under the shield of law and in the name of justice. International, constitutional and US statute laws no longer matter. Obama declared them null and void. He does so by disregarding them. He consigned them to the dustbin of history. Theyve been heading there for years. Post-9/11, state terror accelerated. Bush administration rogues enacted numerous police state laws. Previous articles discussed them. Constitutionality was ignored. Obama added his own. Doing so exceeded the worst of his predecessors policies. Unconstitutional mass surveillance is official US policy. What Bush began, Obama accelerated. He did so straightaway as president. Free societies dont tolerate these practices. Obama authorized them secretly. He subverted constitutional law. He violated the public trust. He broke a key campaign pledge. On January 8, 2008, he promised to end Bush/Cheney practices. Under an Obama administration, he said, theyll be no wiretaps without warrants. Straightaway as president he authorized them. On Friday, he tried defending the indefensible. He fell short and then some. His comments belie his policies. Americans have never been less safe. Freedom is more illusion than reality. Obamas done more to subvert constitutional law than any previous president. He made freedom a four-letter word. You cant have 100% security and also then have 100% privacy and zero inconvenience, he claimed. Were going to have to make some choices as a society. I think that on balance, we have established a process and a procedure that the American people should feel comfortable about. Obama made all the wrong choices. He violated constitutional law doing so. Americas unsafe to live in. Police state priorities threaten everyone. Obama claimed surveillance help(s) prevent terrorist attacks. He lied saying so. No terrorist threat whatever exists. It didnt earlier. It doesnt now. Obama called whats ongoing modest encroachments on privacy. Its sweeping, pervasive and lawless. He urged Americans to trust him, Congress and federal courts. Why anyone would do so, theyll have to explain. When it comes to telephone calls, nobody is listening to your telephone calls, he said. Thats not what this program is about. As was indicated, what the intelligence community is doing is looking at phone numbers and durations of calls. They are not looking at peoples names and they are not looking at content. Permission to do so, he claimed, requires go(ing) back to a federal judge just like (for) a criminal investigation. With respect to the Internet and emails, this does not apply to US citizens and it does not apply to people living in the United States. False on all counts. Civil libertarians expressed outraged. John Simpson heads Consumer Watchdogs Privacy Project. He calls whats ongoing a completely unwarranted violation of our constitutional rights. Obama authorized sweeping domestic spying. He did so unconstitutionally. He institutionalized it. Its ongoing daily. Its warrantless. The 2012 FISA Amendments Reauthorization Act renewed warrantless spying for another five years. It violated constitutional protections doing so. Phone calls, emails, and other communications may be monitored secretly without court authorization. Probable cause isnt needed. So-called foreign intelligence information sought means virtually anything. Vague language is all-embracing. Hundreds of millions of Americans are targeted. Major telecom and Internet companies cooperate. They do so willingly. All three branches of government are involved. Theyre complicit in sweeping lawlessness. Congress is regularly briefly. Bipartisan leaders are fully on board. So are US courts. The Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) called whats ongoing the most sweeping surveillance ever ordered. Its challenging administration practices to stop them. CCR v. Obama is currently pending before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Initially it was filed against Bush, NSA director General Keith Alexander, and heads of other major US security agencies. At issue is lawless, secretive, warrantless surveillance. CCR sought a cease and desist injunction. In January 2007, Bush administration officials claimed the program ended. They lied saying so. In August 2007, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) became law. Included is a Protect America Act (PAA) amendment. It permits unrestricted warrantless data-mining. It claims to restrict surveillance to foreign nationals reasonably believed to be outside the United States. Not so! The law targets virtually everyone domestically. It does so if the Attorney General or Director of National Intelligence claims they pose a potential terrorist or national security threat. No corroborating evidence is needed. CCR challenged PAA in court. It did so in January 2006. It called NSA surveillance illegal. It lacks judicial approval or statutory authorization. It violates FISAs clear criminal prohibitions. It exceeds executive authority under the Constitutions Article II. It breaches the First and Fourth Amendments. CCR wants data and other information collected under PAA destroyed. On January 31, 2011, the US District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissed CCRs case. In April, CCR appealed. The Ninth Circuit initially scheduled oral arguments on June 1, 2012. On May 21, 2012, the Supreme Court agreed to hear a similar ACLU case. It challenged the 2008 FISA Amendments Acts constitutionality. The Ninth Circuit postponed arguments until the High Court ruled. On February 26, 2013, it dismissed ACLUs case. It did so 5 4. The Ninth Circuit requested supplemental CCR briefs by April 26, 2013. Previously it said it would reschedule oral arguments. On June 3, the panel indicated that it would submit the case for resolution without oral argument. Theres more. Obamas waging war on freedom globally. On June 7, Londons Guardian headlined Obama orders US to draw up overseas target list for cyber-attacks. He did so by secret presidential directive. It was issued last October. A copy was leaked to The Guardian. It says Offensive Cyber Effects Operations (OCEO) can offer unique and unconventional capabilities to advance US national objectives around the world with little or no warning to the adversary or target and with potential effects ranging from subtle to severely damaging. Washington will identify potential targets of national importance where OCEO can offer a favorable balance of effectiveness and risk as compared with other instruments of national power. It suggests operating domestically the same way. Perhaps human rights organizations, anti-war activists, social justice advocates, independent journalists, alternative media web sites, and other individuals and organizations challenging lawless government practices will be targeted. Everyone is vulnerable. Police states operate that way. Americas by far the worst. Obamas waging war on freedom. It may not survive on his watch. Unrestricted surveillance, other police state laws, and global cyber attacks constitute full-scale war to destroy it. According to Professor Sean Lawson: When militarist cyber rhetoric results in use of offensive cyber attack it is likely that those attacks will escalate into physical, kinetic uses of force. Cyberwar is official US policy. An unnamed intelligence source told The Guardian that cyber attacks are commonplace. Foreign computer systems are hacked. Doing so seeks information wanted. We hack everyone everywhere, the source said. We like to make a distinction between us and the others. But we are in almost every country in the world. Obama bears full responsibility. He signed numerous police state laws on his watch. He authorized lawless surveillance and cyberwar. He did so unconstitutionally. Claiming otherwise doesnt wash. Documents The Guardian obtained refute his claims. US policy is do what we say, not what we do. According to The Guardian, Obamas move to establish a potentially aggressive cyber warfare doctrine will heighten fears over the increasing militarization of the internet. On June 7, Gizmodo.co.uk headlined Anonymous Just Leaked a Trove of NSA Documents. Included are DOD plans for Internet control. Information on NSAs Prism program were released. A link provided (http://thedocs.hostzi.com/) fails to gain access. Perhaps Anonymous was hacked. Information the Guardian posted relates to nine or more major online companies cooperating with lawless NSA spying. Google, Microsoft, Yahoo, Facebook, Apple, YouTube and others are involved. Prism gives NSA access to search histories, emails, file transfers and live chats. Its gotten directly from US provider servers. Doing so facilitates mass surveillance. Google denied involvement, saying: It cares deeply about the security of our users data. We disclose user data to government in accordance with the law, and we review all such requests carefully. From time to time, people allege that we have created a government back door into our systems, but Google does not have a back door for the government to access private user data. Previous articles discussed Googles involvement with Bilderberg. CEO Eric Schmidts a regular conference attendee. Hes participating now in suburban London. Infowars reporters Paul Joseph Watson and Jon Scobie said Google and Bilderberg are merging. Schmidt thinks privacy is a relic of the past. He wants Google transformed into the ultimate Big Brother. Conspiring with Bilderberg and NSA are key ways to do it. Company deniability doesnt wash. Google operations are very suspect. CIA funding reportedly launched them. Allying with Bilderberg shows whats at stake. Bilderberg wants Internet control through cyber resistance. It wants a ministry of truth established. It wants all public information controlled. Googles apparently on board to help. Obamas very much involved. Hes waging full-scale war on freedom. It may not survive on his watch. Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.His new book is titled How Wall Street Fleeces America: Privatized Banking, Government Collusion and Class War.Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour/ linkwithin_text=Related Articles: 