Grisly Peshawar Slaughter - Who Created The Taliban, Who Still Funds Them?Tony Cartalucci While the details of the attack are forthcoming, the background of the Taliban and the persistent threat it represents is well established, though often spun across the Western media. Who Put the Taliban into Power? Who is Funding them Now? In the 1980s the United States, Saudi Arabia, and elements within the then Pakistani government funneled millions of dollars, weapons, equipment, and even foreign fighters into Afghanistan in a bid to oust Soviet occupiers. Representatives of this armed proxy front would even visit the White House, meeting President Ronald Reagan personally. The Mujaheddin would successfully expel the Soviet Union and among the many armed groups propped up by the West and its allies, the Taliban would establish primacy over Kabul. While Western media would have the general public believe the US rejected the Taliban, never intending them to come to power, it should be noted that the Afghans who visited Reagan in the 1980s would not be the last to visit the US and cut deals with powerful American corporate-financier interests. In 1997, Taliban representatives would find themselves in Texas, discussing a possible oil pipeline with energy company Unocal (now merged with Chevron). The BBC would report in a 1997 article titled, Taleban in Texas for talks on gas pipeline, that: A senior delegation from the Taleban movement in Afghanistan is in the United States for talks with an international energy company that wants to construct a gas pipeline from Turkmenistan across Afghanistan to Pakistan. A spokesman for the company, Unocal, said the Taleban were expected to spend several days at the companys headquarters in Sugarland, Texas. However, it was already claimed by the US that the Taliban had been harboring Osama Bin Laden since 1996, and had branded the Talibans human rights record as despicable. The Telegraph in an article titled, Oil barons court Taliban in Texas, would report (emphasis added): The Unocal group has one significant attraction for the Taliban it has American government backing. At the end of their stay last week, the Afghan visitors were invited to Washington to meet government officials. The US government, which in the past has branded the Talibans policies against women and children despicable, appears anxious to please the fundamentalists to clinch the lucrative pipeline contract. The Taliban is likely to have been impressed by the American governments interest as it is anxious to win international recognition. So far, it has been recognised only by the UAE, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan. It is clear that to the West, as they were during the proxy war against the Soviets, and during attempts to forge an oil pipeline across Afghan territory, the Taliban remain a tool, not an ally to be used and abused whenever and however necessary to advance Wall Street and Washingtons agenda a self-serving Machiavellian agenda clearly devoid of principles. This can be seen in play, even now as the Taliban serve as a proxy force to torment the Wests political enemies in Pakistan with and serve as a perpetual justification for military intervention in neighboring Afghanistan. The Global Post would reveal in a 2009 investigative report that the Taliban in neighboring Afghanistan was mostly funded via redirected US aid. The report titled, Who is funding the Afghan Taliban? You dont want to know, would state: It is the open secret no one wants to talk about, the unwelcome truth that most prefer to hide. In Afghanistan, one of the richest sources of Taliban funding is the foreign assistance coming into the country. The report would also reveal that Taliban members were in the capital city of Kabul, directly involved in redirecting the funds, apparently under the nose of occupying NATO forces: A shadowy office in Kabul houses the Taliban contracts officer, who examines proposals and negotiates with organizational hierarchies for a percentage. He will not speak to, or even meet with, a journalist, but sources who have spoken with him and who have seen documents say that the process is quite professional. The manager of an Afghan firm with lucrative construction contracts with the U.S. government builds in a minimum of 20 percent for the Taliban in his cost estimates. The manager, who will not speak openly, has told friends privately that he makes in the neighborhood of $1 million per month. Out of this, $200,000 is siphoned off for the insurgents. But the narrative of the accidental funding of Taliban militants in Afghanistan is betrayed when examining their counterparts in Pakistan and their source of funding. While the US funds roughly a billion USD a year to the Taliban in Afghanistan accidentally, their allies in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia are confirmed to be funding the Taliban in Pakistan. In the Guardians article, WikiLeaks cables portray Saudi Arabia as a cash machine for terrorists, the US State Department even acknowledges that Saudi Arabia is indeed funding terrorism in Pakistan: Saudi Arabia is the worlds largest source of funds for Islamist militant groups such as the Afghan Taliban and Lashkar-e-Taiba but the Saudi government is reluctant to stem the flow of money, according to Hillary Clinton. More needs to be done since Saudi Arabia remains a critical financial support base for al-Qaida, the Taliban, LeT and other terrorist groups, says a secret December 2009 paper signed by the US secretary of state. Her memo urged US diplomats to redouble their efforts to stop Gulf money reaching extremists in Pakistan and Afghanistan. Donors in Saudi Arabia constitute the most significant source of funding to Sunni terrorist groups worldwide, she said. Three other Arab countries are listed as sources of militant money: Qatar, Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates. Pakistani terror organization Lashkar-e-Jhangvi which maintains ties to the Taliban has also been financially linked to the Persian Gulf monarchies. Stanford Universitys Mapping Militant Organizations: Lashkar-e-Jhangvi, states under External Influences: LeJ has received money from several Persian Gulf countries including Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates[25] These countries funded LeJ and other Sunni militant groups primarily to counter the rising influence of Irans revolutionary Shiism. Astonishingly, despite these admission, the US still works politically, financially, economically, and even militarily in tandem with these very same state-sponsors of rampant, global terrorism. In fact, Wall Street and Washington are among the chief architects and beneficiaries of this global terrorism. Just as in Libya and Syria where the US and its Persian Gulf allies funded terrorist fronts in bids to overthrow each nations respective governments, this unholy alliance is working in Pakistan to create a militant front with which to menace political groups in Islamabad and reorder the country to reflect and serve their collective interests. And just as in Syria now, where the US feigns to be locked in battle with terrorists of their own creation, the fact that the US is funding their own enemy billions of dollars while allegedly fighting them in Afghanistan creates a perpetual conflict justifying their continued intervention in the region overtly and covertly. When a terrorist attack is carried out in Pakistan by the Taliban, it must then be looked at through this lens of global geopolitical reality. Attempts by the Western media to reduce this recent attack to mere extremism, preying on global audiences emotionally, provides impunity for the state-sponsors of the Taliban those funding, arming, and directing their operations across the region, and then benefiting from their horrific consequences. It appears, just as in Libya, Syria, and Iraq, the West and its allies are waging a proxy war in Pakistan as well. Attempts to exploit the tragedy in Peshawar compound this insidious agenda. Those across Pakistans political landscape must understand that their is no line these foreign interests are unwilling to cross in achieving their agenda be it a line crossed at a perceived allys expense, or a perceived enemys expense. Tony Cartaluccis articles have appeared on many alternative media websites, including his own at Land Destroyer Report, Alternative Thai News Network and LocalOrg. Read other contributed articles by Tony Cartalucci here. 