Israel bars five foreign ministers from entering West Bank in flagrant violation of international lawMadison Ruppert, Contributor Mohammed Kamel Amr, the Egyptian Foreign Minister, stated during a press conference on August 5, 2012 in Amman, Jordan that the NAM Ministerial Committee on Palestine condemned the blatant action by Israel. This type of unabashed flouting of international law on the part of Israel is nothing new by any means, but this comes at especially tense times, as the New York Times notes in reporting, The cancellation of the Ramallah conference came as an Israeli airstrike killed a Palestinian militant and seriously wounded another in the southern Gaza Strip town of Rafah. The attack killed 22-year-old Eid Oukal and wounded Ahmed Said Ismai, both allegedly members of the Popular Resistance Committees in Palestine.However, the timing is not only noteworthy because of the recent violence. Indeed, there is perhaps a much more significant reason for Israel to refuse entry to the NAM ministers. The ministers were scheduled to sign a declaration explicitly supporting a renewed push for Palestine to be officially upgraded to non-member state, a move which Israel obviously does not endorse. The foreign ministers of Algeria, Bangladesh, Cuba, Indonesia and Malaysia were all denied entry but it does not appear to have weakened the resolve of the NAM ministers on the Palestine Committee in any way. The document which was going to be signed by the foreign ministers of the 13 nations on the NAM Palestine Committee, dubbed the Ramallah Declaration, also condemns settlements and supports a Palestinian state. According to the Palestinian Authority Foreign Minister Riyad al-Maliki, the statement is a political declaration that endorses and supports the Palestinian peoples right to have a state, condemns settlements, and supports the Palestinian bid to obtain non-member status at the UN, as reported by Press TV. Maliki even went as far as to call the Israeli move a war crime, according to the Jerusalem Post. It appears that the efforts of Palestine within the United Nations have been scaled back slightly, evidenced by the fact that they are no longer attempting to gain full member status in the international body. However, this account is contradicted by the New York Times which is reporting that Abbas stated that he would not seek a General Assembly vote on the issue until some point in late November. The previous request died in committee, but unlike the Security Council which has the strongly pro-Israel United States holding veto power, the General Assembly is likely to support the Palestinian effort. The status they are now seeking is, in my opinion, much more realistic since they are only seeking the same status enjoyed by the Vatican, thus giving them access to the International Criminal Court (ICC). Yet this might be a bit more controversial than one would think since, as the New York Times rightly noted, the Palestinians could pursue legal cases against Israeli settlers and officials for actions in the West Bank. It will be interesting to see if the rabidly anti-Palestinian states in the United Nations will be willing to even allow the Palestinian people to have the lowly status they are seeking or if they will continue to refuse to give them any and all recognition across the board. Did I forget anything or miss any errors? Would you like to make me aware of a story or subject to cover? Or perhaps you want to bring your writing to a wider audience? Feel free to contact me at admin@EndtheLie.com with your concerns, tips, questions, original writings, insults or just about anything that may strike your fancy. Please support our work and help us start to pay contributors by doing your shopping through our Amazon link or check out some must-have products at our store. This article first appeared at End the Lie. linkwithin_text=Related Articles: 