IPCC warns policymakers not to stop solar radiation managementRady Ananda Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, (referred to as AR5) supersedes the former report published in 2007. The IPCCs first Assessment Report was published in 1990. (In case the Summary containing that warning is changed, here is the version downloaded on Nov. 3, 2013.) The discussion in the Summary for Policymakers and in the body of AR5 commends solar radiation management over carbon dioxide removal methods, which are limited in their efficacy on a global scale, yet admits that neither are ideal, and that both geoengineering techniques will have long-term and potentially unknown consequences. While the entire community of academia still pretends not to know about the ongoing reality of global geoengineering, comments Dane Wigington at Geoengineering Watch, the simple fact that they are now discussing geoengineering in the latest IPCC report indicates that the veil is beginning to lift. Solar radiation management comprises various techniques aimed at reflecting or diverting solar radiation back into space, essentially increasing the planets albedo (reflectivity). Many geoengineers, along with the IPCC, prefer solar radiation management methods to carbon dioxide removal as a climate fix, given the planets complex carbon feedback loops, and the much cheaper and quicker method of spraying our skies with albedo-enhancing particles. In a world run by sanity, we would forego fossil fuels for free and abundant solar energy, coupled with Teslas development of free electricity, to meet the worlds energy needs, without destroying our nest by extracting and burning fossil fuels. Solar radiation management has three essential characteristics, notes the International Risk Governance Council (IRGC). It is cheap, fast and imperfect, [4] Citing geoengineering activist, David Keith, the IRGC explains that by injecting 13,000 tons of sulphate aerosol into the stratosphere on a daily basis, they would offset the radiative effects of a doubling of atmospheric CO2 concentrations. This compares to having to remove 225 million tons per day of CO2 from the atmosphere for 25 years. Were reason to prevail, we would capture solar energy, not block it; we would shun fossil fuels, not wage ecocidal wars to seize remaining supplies. In todays world, however, policymakers have diverted billions of dollars into blocking the sun. Efficient systems cost around $10 billion a year, well within the budgets of most countries, notes the IRGC. In addition to warning policymakers in its Summary that chemtrails must continue, the IPCC also denies that such programs exist. Buried within Chapter 7, the IPCC simply states, SRM methods are unimplemented and untested. Its an odd statement, given the warning that to stop SRM would heat the planet. Plus, the IPCC admits in AR5: One of the programs listed, the Intercontinental Chemical Transport Experiment, covered the Northern Hemisphere, measuring aerosols originating in Asia and crossing the Pacific into North America, then continuing across the continent, across the Atlantic Ocean and into Europe. Headed by the International Global Atmospheric Chemistry Project, these flights ran in 2004 and 2006, and reportedly numbered less than four dozen. Another experiment, the European Aerosol Cloud Climate and Air Quality Interactions Project, started in January 2007 and ended in December 2010 running for a full four years, and included Africa. In addition to the joint regional projects, several nations also perform smaller field trials within their own borders. India admits to running SRM programs for over ten years. Another inconsistency in AR5 is its discussion of persistent contrails. Despite the dire warning in the Summary urging policymakers to continue with their solar radiation management programs lest the planets surface cooks, the body of AR5 sees persistent contrails as responsible for only a very slight increase in radiative forcing (where solar energy is radiated back into space). Overall, the IPCC has medium confidence that these persistent contrails and their induced cirrus clouds do not change surface temperatures on the planet. This contradicts what scientists found during the 3-day grounding of all US planes after 9/11 (except those scooting Saudis out of the country). Ground temperatures increased 2-3 C during the absence of contrails, persistent or not. Developed in 1988 by the United Nations Environment Programme and the UNs World Meteorological Organization, the IPCC maintains its silence on military weather modification applications which continue to skew the climate data. Extreme weather and climate events are linked to climate change while no mention is made of government programs deliberately aimed at modifying the weather and inducing earthquakes, drought, rain, and tsunamis. Planetary weapons developed by the US have a long history. But the IPCC remains mum on these projects, except to deny they exist, while at the same time urging in its Summary that they must continue or global warming will spike. The 2013 IPCC report states: To claim that solar radiation management methods (which include chemtrails and HAARP-induced changes) are unimplemented and untested is patently absurd, and contradicts a library of evidence. At the very least, while the veil may be lifting on geoengineering practices, there is still an apparent effort to conceal the extent to which the planet is already being engineered. Policy makers for the most part are not going to read the 2000+ page IPCC report but will rely instead on the Summary, which (again) warns that if solar radiation management were terminated for any reason, there is high confidence that global surface temperatures would rise very rapidly to values consistent with the greenhouse gas forcing. Climate report for the next decade? More HAARP and chemtrails ahead. Rady Ananda is the creator of Food Freedom News and COTO Report, Rady Anandas work has appeared in several online and print publications, including four books. With a B.S. in Natural Resources from Ohio State Universitys School of Agriculture, Rady tweets @geobear7 and @RadysRant. Recently by Rady Ananda: 