Encrypted iPhone Data: Apple vs FBI Public Relations Charade?By Makia Freeman First of all, here is some of the text from the legal order: Despite both a warrant authorizing the search and the phone owners consent, the government has beenunable to complete the search because it cannot access the iPhones encrypted content. Apple has the exclusive technicalmeans which would assist the government in completing its search, but it has declined to provide that assistancevoluntarily. Accordingly, the government respectfully requests that this Court issue an order compelling Apple to assist in enabling the search commanded by the warrant. Whenever you read a story on the Mainstream Media, you have to run it through your own truth filters to see if it adds up. In this case, here are a number of questions about the case: 1. Why would we assume that Apple is doing this for principled reasons? At the every least, they would be doing it as a business move to become a key market differentiator by trying to set themselves apart from other tech companies as a companythat really cares about consumer privacy. However, did you know that Apple has unlocked the encrypted iPhone data for the Feds 70 times in the past? 2. How do we know for sure that the FBI cant already hack into encrypted iPhone data? We are told that end-to-end encryption is currently unbreakable by intelligence agencies like the FBI, CIA and NSA. But whos to say they havent already worked out how to do it, and are keeping it secret? 3. Could this be a big public relations charade on both sides Apple to pretend it really cares about consumer privacy, and the FBI to put on a show that it cant hack end-to-end encryption, or encrypted iPhone data, when it really can? 4. If the NSA cant already hack encrypted iPhone data (even with the new iOS 9 which was released on September 16, 2015), then why did Michael Hayden, former director of both the NSA (1999-2005) and CIA (2006-2009), state in this interview that the intelligence agencies figured out a way around an inbuilt backdoor? (In the mid-1990s) we then began the greatest 15 years in the history of electronic surveillance. It didnt matter we figured out ways to get around the unbreakable encryption number one, no encryption is unbreakable, it just takes more computing power, and number two we developed bulk collection and metadata. 5. Is the FBI only doing this to try to make something legal that they can already do, so there will be legal precedent in future and less roadblocks to their ubiquitous surveillance? 6. Finally, let us remember that San Bernardino was a blatant false flag event, another in a long string of false flag shootings and bombings that have taken place in the US. We already know the Government was behind this, not some Muslim patsies. Is the FBI using this case to gain more sympathy for its cause, playing on Islamophobia and the American publics gullibility, hoping people will cry out for the FBI to make it safe and give up their rights, liberties and privacy in the process? ***** Want the latest commentaryand analysis on Conspiracy, Natural Health, Sovereignty, Consciousness and more? Sign up forfree blog updates! Makia Freeman is the editor of alternative news / independent media siteThe Freedom Articlesand senior researcher atToolsForFreedom.com(FaceBookhere), writing on many aspects of truth and freedom, from exposing aspects of the worldwideconspiracy to suggesting solutions for how humanity can create a new system of peace and abundance. Sources: Image Credit This article, perhaps out of antipathy toward the government for any reason, suggests that the government may already be able to access the Apple phone and just isnt telling, and further suggests that it may be doing that to put on a show that it cant hack end-to-end encryption, or encrypted iPhone data, when it really can. Apart from it being unlikely that the government would waste its own or the courts time for this There was a really excellent discussion about this issue on Charlie Roses show last night. I recommend that anyone interested in this issue watch the video on the Charlie Rose site when its posted. I came away convinced that the government has the better argument. This is nothing like the government monitoring all our phone conversations, or even metadata. This is about accessing a specific smartphone, under a court-issued search warrant directed to it, in order to get criminal, even terrorist, activity. We have done that since the Fourth Amendment was written. We can do it to the U.S. mail, and to ordinary telephones, and lots of dangerous criminals have been locked up that way. It makes no sense to cut major slack for criminals who are the most dangerous to us yet, just because the technology is harder to pierce. Charlie Rose? Love those psy ops. DL Trolling pays well? ::f220Work At Home.Special Report.Earn 18k+ per monthfew days ago new McLaren. F1 bought after earning 18,512$,,,this was my previous months paycheck ,and-a little over, 17k$ Last month ..3-5 h/r of work a days ..with extra open doors weekly. paychecks.. its realy the easiest work I have ever Do.. I Joined This 7 months ago and now making over 87$, p/h.Learn. More right Here::f220 http://www.easytechjob.com.nu .2:2:2:2:2:2:2:2:2:2:2:2:2:2:2:2:2:2:2:2:2:2:2:2:2:2:2:2:::::::f220. Im sure that most (if not all) chips have a backdoor that the nsa or mosad or any other alphabet Deceipt has can access at anytime. Keep in mind they can steal your data they can certainly taint your data (download a bunch of b.s.) and make you appear to be scum. This is the real deal. This in how the FBI operates. Stasi or Mossad couldnt have done it better. Finally, let us remember that San Bernardino was a blatant false flag event, another in a long string of false flag shootings and bombings that have taken place in the US. We already know the Government was behind this, not some Muslim patsies. Is the FBI using this case to gain more sympathy for its cause, playing on Islamophobia and the American publics gullibility, hoping people will cry out for the FBI to make it safe and give up their rights, liberties and privacy in the process? 