Judge Responds To Womans Demands That She Be Allowed To Swear On The Quran According to recent reports, a judge in Pennsylvania made the controversial decision not to allow a Muslim woman to swear on the Quran before testifying in a custody suit against her husband. According to Pennsylvania law, witnesses must take an oath on the Christian Bible or choose to make a non-religious declaration before testifying. Now, the woman is questioning that law, claiming that her religious rights are being violated. Her husband, who she is separated from, did have the opportunity to swear on the Bible before he testified. Now, he is pointing to this discrepancy in the custody battle. He told the court that the womans refusal to swear on a Bible or make a non-religious affirmation served as a sort of witness intimidation, since it could be construed to imply that his testimony would be less than truthful as he swore on a non-Islamic book, one publication wrote. The woman in the case is now pointing to other states that allow other religious writings to be used in court. What do you think of the incident? Should the Quran be allowed in court under any circumstances? 