Your Artificial Knee Might Get You GropedAnn Pringle A twenty-something woman is running the back of her hand across the base of my breasts. I stand there, legs spread as she moves on to the inside of my thighs. She runs her hand underneath the waistline of my pants and across my buttocks. Im angry and embarrassed. The woman touching me seems embarrassed, too. When shes done her coworker, a young woman with a large neck tattoo poorly covered with makeup, rummages through my suitcase, purse, and laptop bag. Piece by piece, she pulls out my still-damp bathing suit, my underwear, and a few crumpled up dresses. She tosses my iPad aside, jiggles a bottle of prescription medicine, and stares at my EpiPen, bewildered. Shes enjoying thistoday she is in charge of me. Sad to say, if you fly often, youve likely had a similar experience. Mary Beth Ruskai, a 70-year-old Boston-based professor who counts proving that an atom with fixed nuclear charge can bind only finitely many electrons among her proudest achievementsalong with challenging the challenging Transportation Security Administrations policy of enhanced pat-downs in federal courtcertainly has. Artificial Joints Up Your Chance of an Enhanced Pat Down In the US, 4.5 million people over age 50 have artificial knees, and over 1 million people receive some type of total joint replacement each year. For these people, getting through airport security with their dignity intact can be next to impossible, largely because of TSAs current policy of performing enhanced pat-downs on anyone who sets off a walk-through metal detector.Enhanced pat-downs werent always de rigueur. Ruskai travels often for work, and after her right knee was replaced in 2008 (her left knee and right hip were also replaced in 2012) she began traveling with x-rays and other medical documents noting her metal joints. The Department of Homeland Security also cleared her as a Trusted Traveler, meaning shes already voluntarily provided copious amounts of personal information to DHS, and its determined shes a low-risk flier. When Ruskais metal knee set off walkthrough metal detectors prior to 2010, shed offer up medical documents noting the artificial joint, a female TSA agent would use a handheld metal detector to confirm that the metal on her was limited to her knee, and then the agent would pat down her knee area only. In other words, the process was annoying, but thats about it. Then in late 2010, the TSA began using enhanced pat-downs in lieu of handheld metal detectors for secondary screening at all security lines with walkthrough metal detectors. Though it began using Advanced Imaging Technology (full body scanners) in 2008which will cost taxpayers $2 billion by 2015 and presents its own privacy issuesaround 290 or so domestic security checkpoints still use walkthrough metal detectors as their primary mode of screening. And as youve likely noticed, full body scanners are often not operational at the airports that do have them. As pat-downs became the standard secondary screening measure, TSA also amplified what they involved. According to a brief filed by Ruskais attorneys: The new procedures involve a more detailed tactile inspection of areas higher on the thigh and in the groin area [and] routinely involve touching of buttocks and genitals. The agent is required to run the hand up the passengers thighs until reaching the groin twice on each legfrom the front and back. The agent also must insert the hand into the passengers waistband around the entire waste, and for female passengers, around the breasts. I squirmed just typing that out. Its exactly what happens. Ruskai filed complaints with TSA and DHS, and 10 months later TSA issued a final order stating it would not investigate her complaints. In April 2012, she petitioned the First Circuit Court of Appeals to review that order and determine, among other issues, whether the enhanced pat-downs violate her Fourth Amendment rights. The court heard oral arguments in January of this year, but it has not yet reached a decision. I wont regurgitate all of the 4th Amendment case law here. The abridged version is: the 4th protects you from unreasonable searches and seizures; airport security screenings are searches under the 4th Amendment; and, under narrow circumstances, including where the government seeks to prevent hazardous conditions, a warrantless, non-individualized search may be reasonable, depending on the seriousness of the hazard and the invasiveness of the search. While they wait for the court to decide whether routinely molesting travelers with artificial joints is reasonable, millions of seniors have limited options: avoid airplanes or only travel through airports that use full body scanners. Then again, theres no guarantee those full body scanners will be up and running when they make their way through security. I dont have an artificial joint, but for whatever reason TSA often singles me out for enhanced pat-downs. Maybe the freckles and blue eyes make me look dangerous. Regardless, Im applying to become a Trusted Traveler through TSA Pre in the hope that this will stop. If youre a US citizen or lawful permanent resident, have never been convicted of sedition, treason, murder, or other outrageous felonies, and have $85 to spare, consider doing the same. Yes, TSA Pre and the other Trusted Traveler programs require you to divulge personal information. And yes, its frightening that you might have to considering doing this to avoid airport groping. On balance, though, Id rather hand over personal information that the federal government surely has already than let another TSA agent stick her hand in my pantshow sad it is that anyone has to make that choice. How to protect your personal liberties is just one of the many topics we cover at Millers Money Weekly, where this article first appeared, our free missive dedicated to all-things retirement. Receive your free copy each and every Thursday by signing up here today. 