  It is not uncommon, e.g. in the media, that specific groups are categorizedas being racist. Based on an extensive dataset of intermarriage statistics ourstudy questions the legitimacy of such characterizations. It suggests that, farfrom being group-dependent, segregation mechanisms are insteadsituation-dependent. More precisely, the degree of integration of a minority interms of the frequency of intermarriage is seen to crucially depend upon thethe proportion p of the minority. Thus, a population may have a segregativebehavior with respect to a high-p (p>20%) minority A and at the same time atolerant attitude toward a low-p (p<2%) minority B. This remains true even whenA and B represent the same minority; for instance Black-White intermarriage ismuch more frequent in Montana than it is in South Carolina. In short, thenature of minority groups is largely irrelevant, the key factor being theirproportion in a given area.
Based on an extensive dataset of intermarriage statistics our study questions the legitimacy of such characterizations.