  The social news aggregator Digg allows users to submit and moderate storiesby voting on (digging) them. As is true of most social sites, userparticipation on Digg is non-uniformly distributed, with few users contributinga disproportionate fraction of content. We studied user participation on Digg,to see whether it is motivated by competition, fueled by user ranking, orsocial factors, such as community acceptance.  For our study we collected activity data of the top users weekly over thecourse of a year. We computed the number of stories users submitted, dugg orcommented on weekly. We report a spike in user activity in September 2006,followed by a gradual decline, which seems unaffected by the elimination ofuser ranking. The spike can be explained by a controversy that broke out at thebeginning of September 2006. We believe that the lasting acrimony that thisincident has created led to a decline of top user participation on Digg.
For our study we collected activity data of the top users weekly over the course of a year. We computed the number of stories users submitted, dugg or commented on weekly.