  In this contribution we investigate how to describe the results and usage ofevolutionary synthesis models. In particular, we look for an explicit andquantitative description of the parameter space of synthesis models and theevaluation of their associated uncertainties and dispersion. First, we need tounderstand what synthesis models actually compute: we show that a syntheticstellar population with fixed physical parameters (age, metallicity, starformation history, initial mass function and size of the system) can only bedescribed in terms of probability distributions (i.e. there is an intrinsicdispersion in any model). Second, we need to identify and characterize thecoverage in the parameter space of the models (i.e. the combinations of inputparameters that yield meaningful models) and the different sources ofsystematic errors. Third, we need a way to describe quantitatively theintrinsic dispersion, the systematic error and the parameter space coverage ofthe models.  Up to now, the parameter space coverage and uncertainties have been describedqualitatively in the models' reference papers, with potentialmisinterpretations by models' users. We show how Virtual Observatorydevelopments enable a correct use of synthesis models to obtain accurate (andnot simply precise) results.
First, we need to understand what synthesis models actually compute: we show that a synthetic stellar population with fixed physical parameters (age, metallicity, star formation history, initial mass function and size of the system) can only be described in terms of probability distributions (i.e. there is an intrinsic dispersion in any model). Second, we need to identify and characterize the coverage in the parameter space of the models (i.e. the combinations of input parameters that yield meaningful models) and the different sources of systematic errors. Third, we need a way to describe quantitatively the intrinsic dispersion, the systematic error and the parameter space coverage of the models.