  The problem of intermediates in the fossil record has been frequentlydiscussed ever since Darwin. The extent of `gaps' (missing transitional stages)has been used to argue against gradual evolution from a common ancestor.Traditionally, gaps have often been explained by the improbability offossilization and the discontinuous selection of found fossils. Here we take ananalytical approach and demonstrate why, under certain sampling conditions, wemay not expect intermediates to be found. Using a simple null model, we showmathematically that the question of whether a taxon sampled from some time inthe past is likely to be morphologically intermediate to other samples (datedearlier and later) depends on the shape and dimensions of the underlyingphylogenetic tree that connects the taxa, and the times from which the fossilsare sampled.
Using a simple null model, we show mathematically that the question of whether a taxon sampled from some time in the past is likely to be morphologically intermediate to other samples (dated earlier and later) depends on the shape and dimensions of the underlying phylogenetic tree that connects the taxa, and the times from which the fossils are sampled.