  The process of identifying a time variable in time reparameterizationinvariant theories results in great ambiguities about the actual laws ofphysics described by a given theory. A theory set up to describe one set ofphysical laws can equally well be interpreted as describing any other laws ofphysics by making a different choice of time variable or ``clock''. In thisarticle we demonstrate how this ``clock ambiguity'' arises and then discuss howone might still hope to extract specific predictions about the laws of physicseven when the clock ambiguity is present. We argue that a requirement ofquasi-separability should play a critical role in such an analysis. As a stepin this direction, we compare the Hamiltonian of a local quantum field theorywith a completely random Hamiltonian. We find that any random Hamiltonian(constructed in a sufficiently large space) can yield a ``good enough''approximation to a local field theory. Based on this result we argue thattheories that suffer from the clock ambiguity may in the end provide a viablefundamental framework for physics in which locality can be seen as a stronglyfavored (or predicted) emergent behavior. We also speculate on how other keyaspects of known physics such as gauge symmetries and Poincare invariance mightbe predicted to emerge in this framework.
As a step in this direction, we compare the Hamiltonian of a local quantum field theory with a completely random Hamiltonian. We find that any random Hamiltonian (constructed in a sufficiently large space) can yield a ``good enough'' approximation to a local field theory.