  Power-law distributions occur in many situations of scientific interest andhave significant consequences for our understanding of natural and man-madephenomena. Unfortunately, the detection and characterization of power laws iscomplicated by the large fluctuations that occur in the tail of thedistribution -- the part of the distribution representing large but rare events-- and by the difficulty of identifying the range over which power-law behaviorholds. Commonly used methods for analyzing power-law data, such asleast-squares fitting, can produce substantially inaccurate estimates ofparameters for power-law distributions, and even in cases where such methodsreturn accurate answers they are still unsatisfactory because they give noindication of whether the data obey a power law at all. Here we present aprincipled statistical framework for discerning and quantifying power-lawbehavior in empirical data. Our approach combines maximum-likelihood fittingmethods with goodness-of-fit tests based on the Kolmogorov-Smirnov statisticand likelihood ratios. We evaluate the effectiveness of the approach with testson synthetic data and give critical comparisons to previous approaches. We alsoapply the proposed methods to twenty-four real-world data sets from a range ofdifferent disciplines, each of which has been conjectured to follow a power-lawdistribution. In some cases we find these conjectures to be consistent with thedata while in others the power law is ruled out.
Our approach combines maximum-likelihood fitting methods with goodness-of-fit tests based on the Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistic and likelihood ratios. We evaluate the effectiveness of the approach with tests on synthetic data and give critical comparisons to previous approaches.