  Modern scientific technology has provided a new class of large-scalesimultaneous inference problems, with thousands of hypothesis tests to considerat the same time. Microarrays epitomize this type of technology, but similarsituations arise in proteomics, spectroscopy, imaging, and social sciencesurveys. This paper uses false discovery rate methods to carry out both sizeand power calculations on large-scale problems. A simple empirical Bayesapproach allows the false discovery rate (fdr) analysis to proceed with aminimum of frequentist or Bayesian modeling assumptions. Closed-form accuracyformulas are derived for estimated false discovery rates, and used to comparedifferent methodologies: local or tail-area fdr's, theoretical, permutation, orempirical null hypothesis estimates. Two microarray data sets as well assimulations are used to evaluate the methodology, the power diagnostics showingwhy nonnull cases might easily fail to appear on a list of ``significant''discoveries.
This paper uses false discovery rate methods to carry out both size and power calculations on large-scale problems. A simple empirical Bayes approach allows the false discovery rate (fdr) analysis to proceed with a minimum of frequentist or Bayesian modeling assumptions. Closed-form accuracy formulas are derived for estimated false discovery rates, and used to compare different methodologies: local or tail-area fdr's, theoretical, permutation, or empirical null hypothesis estimates.