  We discuss quantum non-locality and contextuality using the notion oftransition sets. This approach provides a way to obtain a direct logicalcontradiction with locality/non-contextuality in the EPRB gedanken experimentas well as a clear graphical illustration of what violations of Bellinequalities quantify. In particular, we show graphically how these violationsare related to measures of non-local transition sets. We also introduce a newform of contextuality, {\em measurement ordering contextuality}, i.e. thereexists commuting operators $\hat{\mathcal{A}}$ and $\hat{\mathcal{B}}$ suchthat the outcome for $\hat{\mathcal{A}}$ depends on whether we measured$\hat{\mathcal{B}}$ before or after $\hat{\mathcal{A}}$. It is shown (excludingretro-causal and/or conspiratorial theories) that any hidden variable theorycapable of reproducing the quantum statistics has to have this property. Thisgeneralizes yet another feature of the hidden variable theory of deBroglie andBohm.
We discuss quantum non-locality and contextuality using the notion of transition sets. This approach provides a way to obtain a direct logical contradiction with locality/non-contextuality in the EPRB gedanken experiment as well as a clear graphical illustration of what violations of Bell inequalities quantify.