Triple helix in the agricultural sector of Northeast Asian countries: a comparative study between Korea and China

Abstract

In this paper, the agricultural innovation systems of two Northeast Asian countries—Korea and China—are investigated and compared from the perspective of triple helix innovation. Specifically, the current study examines the nature of agricultural innovation of the two countries and considers agricultural R&D investments and activities as well as the roles of university, industry, and government (UIG), which are the three units comprising the triple helix. As an empirical extension of the qualitative analysis, we collected bibliometric information of agricultural scientific publications from 1990 to 2010 and patent information from 1980 to 2010. By calculating transmission of uncertainty, which indicates collaboration among UIG, this paper tracks the relationship dynamics of the units comprising the triple helix. In addition, we analyze topics in scientific publications and patents in order to observe and compare the subareas that are the focus in the two countries. The findings reveal both commonalities and differences between the two countries, thus providing knowledge of and insights into the agricultural sector.

Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode. 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy,29(2), 109–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leydesdorff, L. (2003). Can “The Public” be considered as a fourth helix in University–Industry–Government relations? Science and Public Policy,30(1), 55–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leydesdorff, L., & Sun, Y. (2009). National and international dimensions of the Triple Helix in Japan: University–industry–government versus international coauthorship relations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,60(4), 778–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Razak, A. A., & Saad, M. (2007). The role of universities in the evolution of the Triple Helix culture of innovation network: The case of Malaysia. International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development,6(3), 211–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rivera, M. I. (2006). The foreign factor within the Triple Helix model: Interactions of national and international innovation systems, technology transfer and implications for the region: The case of the electronics cluster in Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation,1(4), 10–21.Google Scholar