RonaldReagan - April 5, 2015, 3:23 am

This is a little funny. Mostly because of that classic R. Lee Ermey stare

DEMOCRAT ATTACK ADS -

Cyberhagen - September 23, 2012, 12:21 pm

You're applying typical American family values to a Saudi family. The Bin Ladens don't care about Osama; he was already exiled from SA and blackballed from the family.
It took so long to get OBL because Pakistan was sheltering him.

fauxnews - September 12, 2012, 2:02 pm

Hey, bro, tone it down a little. Foxrecon is actually a pretty decent guy. All Americans here, after all. We should keep the quarrels to the posters themselves, not the messageboards, etc. Nothing derogatory about this poster, just his opinion. Peace

starryeyedguy - September 12, 2012, 12:59 pm

George Bush's strategy? LOLOL Seriously? My god, you republicans are something else! Comedy. Georgie boy had 7+ years to get Bin Laden and didn't because of his love affair w/the Saudi Royals. Barack finished him off in his first term. Accept it.

DEPORT? REALLY? - If you do that, who's going to pay for all the welfare?

romneyisatool - September 25, 2012, 10:13 pm

Fair enough.HAHA... You don't seem like a bad guy. Just funning around. Nothing personal. Good luck this November. And I mean that. Take care! God Bless.

jaxx - September 25, 2012, 10:11 pm

We will never agree on anything, except that I'm not a good speller and you are a freaking liberal genius....LOL

romneyisatool - September 25, 2012, 9:40 pm

Oh, if you felt that way you'd be sick of conservatards nitpicking over Obama's birth certificate. Your party is the KING of wasting time on things that don't matter (Swiftboating,g** marriage, etc.). So no one is buying it. Least of all you.

romneyisatool - September 25, 2012, 9:37 pm

Look, if I hurt your feelings, sorry. But doing the typical "ALL LIBERALS ARE A-HOLE" things opens you up to this kind of attack. And if mistakes really matter to you, then Romney's campaign must really be getting you down,a lifetime's worth in a week.LOL

jaxx - September 25, 2012, 9:19 pm

Oh, I forgot, THANK YOU for the correction so all of your liberal A-HOLE buddies can understand what I was saying...LOL

jaxx - September 25, 2012, 9:18 pm

AND, it's just like a liberal to jump on the things that really don't matter.

jaxx - September 25, 2012, 9:17 pm

Hey, A-HOLE if not spelling something is so bad, why don't you think about the road to hell your "Precious Leader" is taking you down. Spelling errors are NOTHING compared to the errors your leader has made.

VOTING REPUBLICAN - One way or another, it's all about ruining lives.

JGalt - December 27, 2013, 11:19 pm

when you realize both sides suck, you'll have taken a major step in recognizing what needs to be fixed with this country.

rockfan5 - February 3, 2013, 10:04 am

Also sadly, if you tax corporations, they can just go back and raise prices on you. So either way you dont win.

realogic - December 5, 2012, 7:59 pm

This is sadly quite true. Corporations own everything and it's done thru extensive lobbying. It's a fact of life and the only reason corporations hate Obama was because he was going to tax them. Instead as usual everyone else pays. Status-quo guys.

CONGRESS - Must be great to be able to vote on your own salary and tax rate.

DIPLOMACY - Ironic that Republicans once dealt with a man who would later be likened to Hitler as justification for war.

realogic - February 9, 2013, 10:56 am

Odd how conservatives forgot how they armed Iran in the firt place. So you armed Iran then armed Iraq. Is there a pattern emerging here or is it just me?

GrouchoMarxist - September 16, 2012, 6:31 am

Odd how libs forget the other side was Iran......

WTFO - September 16, 2012, 12:53 am

Typo: 'denied' (didn't delete the y)

WTFO - September 16, 2012, 12:52 am

Nobody denyied that the US supported Saddam in his fight with Iran (at the time a bigger threat). Sometimes you have to support the lesser of 2 evils. At the time, there wasn't a way to know how dangerous Saddam would become. Ms. Cleo wasn't on the staff.

SethMythrax - September 16, 2012, 12:38 am

http://www.iranchamber.com/history/articles/arming_iraq.php
Sorry, I guess I ran out of room...

SethMythrax - September 16, 2012, 12:37 am

after this meeting America started to supply Saddam with WMD's & the machinery to make them. Thats why they knew Iraq had them & were persistent on attacking.They thought they were there.
http://www.iranchamber.com/history/articles/arming_iraq.ph

falconfan00 - September 3, 2012, 10:46 pm

How many times did Saddam break the UN peace agreement post-Desert Storm that required him to allow WMD inspectors into Iraq? Or did you even know that it happened? I'll give you a hint - it's in double digits.

Trump's Racist Quotes -

GrouchoMarxists - November 17, 2017, 8:37 pm

Usually left wing dribble.. Learn something.

twiddleedeee - August 19, 2016, 11:23 pm

Trump isn't racist. That Muslim Obama and lesbo Hillary are racist. Who are you going to trust with their gut to protect us from the filthy ragheads? The founders of ISIS, or an outsider with brass balls who says it like it is? Trump/Pence 2016!!!!

calron - June 7, 2015, 2:43 pm

falconfan00 - February 20, 2013, 9:07 pm

Bottom line on Obama, he blamed it on a youtube video for a long time. He did it in front of the UN, he did it repeatedly on TV, he did it on Univision. He contradicts his own argument that he was forthcoming with Americans from the beginning.

falconfan00 - February 20, 2013, 9:05 pm

All sarcasm aside, I did enjoy your Churchill comments. Great stuff. I just can't reconcile that an attack on an Embassy on Sept. 11 would trigger any other first reaction otehr than a terrorist attack.

falconfan00 - February 20, 2013, 9:02 pm

To make your story work you have a very complicated story to cover an a**ault on an American Embassy on September 11 of all days. Logic dictates you a**ume it's a terror attack first,not the other way around. That's why it just doesn't work.

falconfan00 - February 20, 2013, 8:59 pm

I won't argue its a war worth winning. My problem is this huge leap your making based on something as patently obvious as this being a terror attack and the a**umed leap to protect an unknown a**et.

crankyhead - February 20, 2013, 5:22 pm

...secret Nazi memos, helped defeat Nazism. Did that suck the hind teat for the fine citizens of Coventry? Of course it did, but it helped win the war. The war on terror is a war, my friend. One that is worth winning.

crankyhead - February 20, 2013, 5:20 pm

Look, my point is this: Churchill allowed the Nazis to bomb Coventry, in order to protect a bigger secret. That secret being, the Allies had cracked the enigma machine, and could eavesdrop on Nazi secret communications. That the Allies could read...

crankyhead - February 20, 2013, 5:09 pm

If you don't know how easy it is to blow a spies cover, and just how detrimental that is to foreign policy, especially in an environment like Libya, just ask Scooter Libby and Karl Rove.

crankyhead - February 20, 2013, 5:07 pm

Now from the other angle: Obama's pissed that someone attacked an embassy. He goes out to talk to the cameras, maybe says a little too much. To protect their a**et, the administration has to back pedal for weeks. You see where I'm going?

crankyhead - February 20, 2013, 5:05 pm

...of course, you have a guy on the inside?

crankyhead - February 20, 2013, 5:05 pm

... a spur of the moment mob uprising. Bear in mind, the designers are the bad guys. Still with me? Ok, so even if you are the POTUS, how is it possible that you know, as much as you know ("act of terror"), in such a small amount of time, unless...

crankyhead - February 20, 2013, 5:04 pm

So, as far as it taking two weeks to be recognized as an act of terror, well, that point is patently false. Secondly, Sept 12th, is around 24 hours after the event happened. This was a coordinated attack on a US embassy, designed to look like...

crankyhead - February 20, 2013, 5:02 pm

A couple of things, so please, bear with me. First off, it states that on the 12th of September, standing in the rose garden, Obama called it an "act of terror". It also says that he used the same phrase, later that day, at a fundraiser in Las Vegas.

falconfan00 - February 20, 2013, 4:58 pm

Whoops. Ok, ya got me there. Sorry. But anyway that's the link, and as credible i think as they come. Give it an honest read and tell me what you think.

crankyhead - February 20, 2013, 4:56 pm

I didn't tell you to do that. That was either Renza, or Papa. Not too observant when it comes to the pertinent details, are you? No worries bro, it happens.

crankyhead - February 20, 2013, 4:54 pm

I'll save you a little more trouble: Sept 12, day after the attack, Obama called it an act of terror. You've heard the term 'fog of war', falcon?

falconfan00 - February 20, 2013, 4:53 pm

I already did dude. It's http://www.factcheck.org/2012/10/benghazi-timeline/. The one you told me to "check again for comprehension."

crankyhead - February 20, 2013, 4:52 pm

You could always just share your link. Save you the time of having to copy/paste it.

crankyhead - February 20, 2013, 4:28 pm

... about the case that were rooted in the truth? Not just some quasi-true, politically charged hyperbole, designed solely to try to gain points with the voting public, weeks before an election?

crankyhead - February 20, 2013, 4:26 pm

There are many reasons why you or any other member of the public shouldn't know the truth, until the certainty of said truth is absolute. Perhaps if your security clearance level was higher, you'd know the truth, or at least you'd know more details...

crankyhead - February 20, 2013, 4:24 pm

I'm saying it's a possibility. There are many other possibilities. Not excluding someones willingness to parrot right wing blogosphere talking points, and then back pedal when confronted with the facts. Namely: Obama called it an act of terror day 1.

falconfan00 - February 20, 2013, 4:17 pm

To clarify: Obama called it terror on day one, then spent weeks NOT calling it terror. Congress knew on day 3 it was terror, but couldn't tell because of a CIA ghost who'd die if we acknowledged what the whole world already knew. Makes perfect sense.

crankyhead - February 20, 2013, 2:27 pm

Speaking of math: Obama actually referred to it as an act of terror, on day one. Bro. Speaking of crazy theories: Would you like any more holes poked in yours? Bro?

crankyhead - February 20, 2013, 2:26 pm

No, I'm saying that it isn't in the interests of national security, to disseminate the facts, until they come to light. Otherwise, you risk jeopardizing your investigation, which coincidentally, isn't over yet. Bro.

crankyhead - February 20, 2013, 2:24 pm

You brought up youtube, I only clarified your comment with the facts. Bro.

falconfan00 - February 20, 2013, 1:06 pm

So.. you're arguing that the reason he couldn't tell us the truth about something blatantly obvious was to cover some spook CIA operative who... what? Leaked that it was a terrorist attack? Haha, why would anyone have to LEAK the obvious? Whatever.

falconfan00 - February 20, 2013, 1:03 pm

Your youtube comment is nonsensical. It seems your argument is that if youtube HAD existed, then Bush would have...I dunno, blamed something on it too? You'll have to clarify that one.

falconfan00 - February 20, 2013, 12:59 pm

The truth is plain. The facts were known in Government on the 14th, and Obama lied for weeks preceding the election. But you can't seem to do the math. You're talking crazy tangent spook theories at this point. Just own it bro.

Renza - February 20, 2013, 12:29 pm

That's right, he just said god told him to go to war. much more credible of a response.

crankyhead - February 20, 2013, 12:06 pm

Well, seeing as how youtube didn't exist until 2005, and wasn't really all that popular until 2007, there's a decent explanation for that, no?

crankyhead - February 20, 2013, 12:04 pm

Really? You think it's weak that the CIA would try to infiltrate Ansar Al-Sharia? Good thing you're not in charge, I guess.

falconfan00 - February 20, 2013, 9:57 am

CIA Operative? That's weak dude. Try again.

falconfan00 - February 20, 2013, 9:56 am

I think there's a very definitive difference between suicide bombers and an 8 hour a**ault on an ambassadors compound. That, and Bush never once pretended they were the cause of a youtube video.

crankyhead - February 20, 2013, 8:07 am

What if there's a CIA operative inside Ansar Al-Sharia who doesn't want his cover blown, and is too important to extract? Then what? It's almost as though you enjoy making my point for me.

PapaFox - February 19, 2013, 10:02 pm

Hence this poster.

falconfan00 - February 19, 2013, 9:22 pm

It was over for me the minute Hillary said, "What does it matter?" The tolerance you guys have for this behavior is unearthly. I do so wish you'd hold your own party accountable for things I know you don't stand with or for.

crankyhead - February 19, 2013, 3:22 pm

Is the investigation over yet falcon?

falconfan00 - February 19, 2013, 3:19 pm

So Carney knows on the 14th... Congress knows on the 14th... but for reasons of what, 'National Security', Americans have to wait until after the election to learn the truth? Come on man. Think.

falconfan00 - February 19, 2013, 3:12 pm

Sept 14:"Later in that same briefing, Carney is told that Pentagon officials informed members of Congress at a closed-door meeting that the Benghazi attack was a planned terrorist attack."

crankyhead - February 19, 2013, 3:04 pm

It's the press secretary's job to release sensitive state secrets to the public during an ongoing investigation? Come on man, think.

falconfan00 - February 19, 2013, 2:49 pm

Sept. 14: At a White House press briefing, Press Secretary Carney denies reports that it was a preplanned attack. “I have seen that report, and the story is absolutely wrong. We were not aware of any actionable intelligence indicating that an attack on...

crankyhead - February 19, 2013, 2:46 pm

Information is power, after all.

crankyhead - February 19, 2013, 2:45 pm

Standard investigative procedure includes disseminating disinformation. The reason being, when the person on the other end of the phone, has the actual details that weren't made public, then you know you're talking to the guy who's responsible. Simple.

crankyhead - February 19, 2013, 2:43 pm

The possibility exists that the state department might not have believed that a 'little known militant group' actually perpetrated it. I'm sure that a lot of groups looking to up their exposure would love to get credit for things they didn't do. Y'know?

falconfan00 - February 19, 2013, 2:27 pm

"...government emails showed the White House and the State Department were told even as the attack was going on that Ansar al-Sharia, a little-known militant group, had claimed credit for it." And for the next 9 weeks we talked about youtube vids.

PapaFox - February 19, 2013, 2:20 pm

Perhaps you could read that factcheck again for comprehension.

falconfan00 - February 19, 2013, 11:08 am

Yea, i wouldn't bother with that pesky factcheck business if i were you, either. It most definitely infringes on your argument. It's like Hillary Clinton said, "What does it matter?" Apparently not much to folks like her.

PapaFox - February 19, 2013, 10:52 am

Seeing as how the facts came out as they were known during the administration's investigation of the attack, there's no coverup.

falconfan00 - February 19, 2013, 9:51 am

Here's the truth, should you ever decide to care:
http://www.factcheck.org/2012/10/benghazi-timeline/

PapaFox - February 19, 2013, 9:40 am

The "coverup" was invented by Republicans with an axe to grind.

thatmfguy - February 19, 2013, 9:12 am

Sorry you can't grasp things like that, but then again I don't expect much along the lines of "thinking" from the likes of you.

thatmfguy - February 19, 2013, 9:12 am

I really hate to stick up for Bush, who next to Obama, is one of my least favorite presidents, but JGalt has a point. People wouldn't be so outraged over Benghazi if there hadn't been a coverup and denied calls for help.

Renza - February 19, 2013, 7:29 am

Clearly nobody cared to even look into these, a republican was in office.

PapaFox - February 19, 2013, 7:26 am

Thank you for proving my point.

JGalt - February 19, 2013, 6:55 am

were there coverups in any of these? Was security pulled, and lavish parties held elsewhere while security was denied? Waiting for those details before going any further on this one....

THE MAFIA - Just like in the "Old Country," organized crime always votes Republican.

OBAMUNISM - Where your money gets invested in a stunted growth fund

KARMA -

MissPriss - March 16, 2015, 11:18 pm

Maybe the USA needs to budget a little $ to help their soldiers once they return to American soil. What they see over there really phucks with their heads back home. NUT-JOB precisely! Maybe a little help for the mental health of those that return?

MashiMashi - February 8, 2015, 6:39 am

he could've took that guy horse riding or hiking, but it was no Obama and them liberals don't want you to have a gun but we'll show them 2nd Amendment and all

MashiMashi - February 8, 2015, 6:37 am

i was led to belive he wads at the gun-range when the soldier started having an episode and kyle rushed over to help out. i didn't know that he was the one that brought the NUT-JOB to the range.

MashiMashi - February 7, 2015, 1:30 pm

I'm a veteran and felt the same way, what was he doing take a troubled soldier to a frick'n gun range, that's about the last place they need to be.

ClintEastwood - February 3, 2015, 3:43 pm

also, how i am a "sellout" and a "traitor" when I'm not even a citizen of your idiocracy? EPICFAIL (like your hero~zero~wormsfood kyle)

ClintEastwood - February 3, 2015, 3:34 pm

says the anonymous internet user who made an account just to attack me while hiding behind her computer. sounds like you are speaking from personal experience. Want 2 to know the big difference between me and Kyle? I'm still here. #winning

Mooooooooooooooooooo - February 3, 2015, 10:40 am

Careful. You're entitled to your opinion, but you can't attack other members for theirs.

apollohollon - February 3, 2015, 8:21 am

Only coward here is you. Making **** comments about someone that saved countless American lives. You're a coward, sellout, traitor that deserves to be dragged by his b**** hair, screaming and kicking out of your parents basement and into the street.

OTC - January 24, 2015, 3:32 pm

That passage is not ideology

ClintEastwood - January 24, 2015, 2:41 pm

Correction: He WAS a soldier. Just to remind you, in case you forgot - the loser was sh** by one of his own "soldiers." He's now where he belongs, in the grave, with other serial killers - Ted Bundy, John Gacy, John Allen Muhammad (also a sniper).

Cyberhagen - January 24, 2015, 12:45 pm

Where's your snarky comment about the murderers he "murdered"? It's called being a soldier, and every country has them. Even children, who in places like Afghanistan are taught by the Taliban to kill at a young age, and oppress women.

ClintEastwood - January 24, 2015, 12:03 am

Emphasis on the word 'was.' lolololol

ClintEastwood - January 24, 2015, 12:02 am

So's trying 2 get away with murder.People seldom get away with it,and as history shows,they always get what's coming to them - as what happened to this cowardly P.O.S.When not busy lying about fighting washed up wrestlers,he was content pissing off vets

Zeitguy - January 23, 2015, 10:51 pm

"Happy shall they be who take your little ones and dash them against the rock" Psalm 137:9. Biblical ideology is inconsistent at best.

INSANITY - Voting for the same destructive parties over and over, expecting different results.

kellyvanrijn - May 4, 2015, 8:37 pm

ROMNEY VS. OBAMA: SUCCESS VS. FAILURE - Nov 6, 2012: The Mormon vs. The Moron. I'll Take The Mormon Over The Moron! I'd Rather Vote for a Mormon With Executive Experience Than the Incompetent MORON currently OCCUPYING the White House!

ARMED LAW-ABIDING CITIZENS - are not the problem. They are the solution. Support the Right to Keep and Bear Arms. Criminals don't follow Gun Laws. Punish Criminals, Not Gun Owners! Don't Disarm the law-abiding American Citizens

Crooked Donald -

fauxnews - June 20, 2016, 4:47 pm

Trump fired his campaign manager today. He's behind in ALL the major polls. He keeps having to modify his stances and comments as his lies consume him. Who needs to hate? He clearly hates himself X-D

Bandit5906 - June 20, 2016, 4:08 pm

Trump has been proven correct, but haters gotta hate!

fauxnews - June 3, 2016, 12:39 pm

It was a share. I wasn't sure if the bad grammar was a "most interesting man" tic, intentional,or a bad typo. Either way I planned to do my own spin on this given its popularity here. Kudos on the feedback. Agree! :-)

nonovelist - June 3, 2016, 11:26 am

I don’t always getting busted-(?) The swastika is too much. Especially when the left is using violent Nazi tactics, and then pass the blame. The a**hat on TU is a nice touch though.

THEY THOUGHT - I Was Giving Them Free Health Care? How Dumb Are These Retards!!!