> I might be a minority on this point (wasn't at WWW2010) but I still
> would like to explore further the use of a more thing-centric RDF
> representation, ie. with subject of statements not being the page. Not
> every site will want this, but others (eg. RottenTomatoes, BestBuy,
> Drupal, ...) are already exploring more extensive use of RDFa and may
> prefer a cleaner model. It should be possible to support (and
> validate, and consume, ...) both idioms and to leave some
> level-of-detail questions to the market / publishers / grassroots /
> pick-your-metaphor...
>
>
+1
Even using the value of og:url would be better than using the URL of the
page, because at least it's a canonical URL.
Cheers,
Peter