So many possibilities for new weapons and fun weekly tasks and the give us crap weapon skins, CC and melee weapons that make no zero difference to the game play. Next week a tank skin... such a poor effort.

So many possibilities for new weapons and fun weekly tasks and the give us crap weapon skins, CC and melee weapons that make no zero difference to the game play. Next week a tank skin... such a poor effort.

Exactly.

How about a sidearm?? Heck, at this point I wouldn’t even care if it was a reused BF1 weapon. Something I’ve otherwise considered lazy. Just give us something worthwhile!

We were supposed to get the panzerbuchse 39 this week,then they took it away. -There's four weeks after the tank skin,and four guns that were put into the game,and advertised. (Panzerbuchse,Welgun,Breda 1935 PG, C96 Trench Carbine)-

If they arent ALL the last four rewards,I'm going to be very upset personally,it's bad enough to dredge myself through thr ToW challenges,with match after match of people cheating,but to get terrible rewards on top of that?

-

Lets not forget they hyped up the Bazooka for Lofoten Islands and no sign of that outside of datamining.

-

Best we can hope for is they pull another Christmas gift like last year,early. There's a lot of things sitting in the game. Waiting for ToW dripfeed,now,or soon at least would be a good time to drop a bunch of things to boost morale

I know people roll their eyes at the women thing, but I would bet anything that this game would have been better received and more popular if DICE didn't do it. People were excited for a gritty WWII experience that paid homage to WWII soldiers and then...BFV happened.

People made fun of that opinion all day long, so did DICE for that matter, but at the end of the day that was the general consumer expectation. Ignoring that expectation and playing to the whims of YouTubers and Twitch streamers is not a winning strategy for a successful game.

DICE defied consumer expectations by putting social issues in the game, and in the case of the single player completely rewriting history to put girls in the story. The tone of WWII is all over the place, and women on the front lines is a big part of that.

Bugs and rudderless design are certainly major problems, but those are basically nails in the coffin at this point.

DICE defied consumer expectations by putting social issues in the game, and in the case of the single player completely rewriting history to put girls in the story. The tone of WWII is all over the place, and women on the front lines is a big part of that.

Bugs and rudderless design are certainly major problems, but those are basically nails in the coffin at this point.

Siege did something similar by putting a overweight trans operator in the Australian SAS. You could immediately see how ludicrous this is given the insane selection process those Tier 1 Operators go through.
It's all PC culture being shoved in our faces and if we speak our opinion against it we are called racist, sexist, bigot, ****. Its am affront to free speech

DICE defied consumer expectations by putting social issues in the game, and in the case of the single player completely rewriting history to put girls in the story. The tone of WWII is all over the place, and women on the front lines is a big part of that.

Bugs and rudderless design are certainly major problems, but those are basically nails in the coffin at this point.

Siege did something similar by putting a overweight trans operator in the Australian SAS. You could immediately see how ludicrous this is given the insane selection process those Tier 1 Operators go through.
It's all PC culture being shoved in our faces and if we speak our opinion against it we are called racist, sexist, bigot, ****. Its am affront to free speech

Yea the people I play Siege with have a...less than PC nickname for her lol

DICE defied consumer expectations by putting social issues in the game, and in the case of the single player completely rewriting history to put girls in the story. The tone of WWII is all over the place, and women on the front lines is a big part of that.

Bugs and rudderless design are certainly major problems, but those are basically nails in the coffin at this point.

Completely disagree, and if this had been a real BF game people wouldn’t care one whit about these things. They’d just be having a blast in a Battlefied game. No one cared about women being in BF1 because it was a fun bf game.

If anything it was the ludicrous cosmetics *on* the woman in the trailer that put people off. It would have been just as bad if it were a robot armed, braveheart painted dude in a popped collar doing baseball slides with a cricket bat.

DICE defied consumer expectations by putting social issues in the game, and in the case of the single player completely rewriting history to put girls in the story. The tone of WWII is all over the place, and women on the front lines is a big part of that.

Bugs and rudderless design are certainly major problems, but those are basically nails in the coffin at this point.

Completely disagree, and if this had been a real BF game people wouldn’t care one whit about these things. They’d just be having a blast in a Battlefied game. No one cared about women being in BF1 because it was a fun bf game.

If anything it was the ludicrous cosmetics *on* the woman in the trailer that put people off. It would have been just as bad if it were a robot armed, braveheart painted dude in a popped collar doing baseball slides with a cricket bat.

That robo arm Braveheart looking dude will probably be a elite skin at some point lol
The only women I remember seeing in BF1 were of the Russian faction, which is accurate. Also true for WW2 but there are no Ruskies