Within projModule, programming elements declared at module level are promoted to projNamespace. In the preceding example, basicEnum and innerClass are promoted, but numberSub is not, because it is not declared at module level.

In the preceding example, the first call uses complete qualification strings. However, this is not necessary because of type promotion. The second call also accesses the module's members without including projModule in the qualification strings.

If the namespace already has a member with the same name as a module member, type promotion is defeated for that module member. The following example shows a skeleton definition of an enumeration and a module within the same namespace.

In the preceding example, Visual Basic cannot promote class abc to thisNameSpace because there is already an enumeration with the same name at namespace level. To access abcSub, you must use the full qualification string thisNamespace.thisModule.abc.abcSub. However, class xyz is still promoted, and you can access xyzSub with the shorter qualification string thisNamespace.xyz.xyzSub.

Defeat of Type Promotion for Partial Types

If a class or structure inside a module uses the Partial (Visual Basic) keyword, type promotion is automatically defeated for that class or structure, whether or not the namespace has a member with the same name. Other elements in the module are still eligible for type promotion.

Consequences. Defeat of type promotion of a partial definition can cause unexpected results and even compiler errors. The following example shows skeleton partial definitions of a class, one of which is inside a module.

In the preceding example, the developer might expect the compiler to merge the two partial definitions of sampleClass. However, the compiler does not consider promotion for the partial definition inside sampleModule. As a result, it attempts to compile two separate and distinct classes, both named sampleClass but with different qualification paths.

The compiler merges partial definitions only when their fully qualified paths are identical.

Unique Names. When you have full control over the naming of programming elements, it is always a good idea to use unique names everywhere. Identical names require extra qualification and can make your code harder to read. They can also lead to subtle errors and unexpected results.

Full Qualification. When you are working with modules and other elements in the same namespace, the safest approach is to always use full qualification for all programming elements. If type promotion is defeated for a module member and you do not fully qualify that member, you could inadvertently access a different programming element.