Q:

What is the official line on Mega-Questions?

With reference to:
Publishing Fantasy versus Realistic Fiction (multiple questions)
It is my opinion that requests for the question to be split down are a little over zealous. After all, one of the suggestions is to collapse Qs 1-3 into a single question. At the moment they are in a single question split down for clarity and I am happy for this.
I think Q4 is too vague by itself and makes more sense within the corpus of this mega-question.
I think Q5 could stand alone but, again, it seems to be more informative within this one question.
I also think that just asking for it to be split to get the "questions asked" per day count up is a bit of a silly reason for someone to be asked to do something like this (I do realise this comment is half-joking... it's the half that's not joking that worries me).
Like I say this is my opinion but I have been asked to "shelve" (i.e. withhold) my given answer which covers all of the sub questions until it has been decided whether the mega-question is allowable.
I would like to suggest that, unless someone submits something along the lines of:

Where can I look for an agent?
What kinds of character archetypes are popular in SF novels?

which are blatantly completely different questions, I would personally allow more related information under one "question heading" clearly split apart with appropriate formatting as the one referenced above is.
This kind of thing is fine in written exams, I believe it should be fine here also.
EDIT:
Would the question be more acceptable phrased like this?
Title: How do I get started with my Fantasy novel?

I have a few questions about a fantasy
  book project. I'm really new to the
  idea of writing a fantasy book so I
  just need some help being pointed in
  the right direction. I could do with
  the following topics being covered:

Is it possible to find a list of
  publishers that publish specifically
  fantasy books? 
On that topic, are
  there "fantasy" agents, editors etc.? 
What are some good resources for writing fantasy?

I realize this question might be
  vague, but I wonder if you guys might
  be able to share some good links to
  some reading, or even books on the
  topic. I'm not asking for a list of
  everything possible, but any advice or
  resources you can share.

I have reduced the first part, taken out the unanswerable question about things being "more accepted" (what the hell is "accepted"?) and made the "main thrust" of the question the community wiki-style bit at the end.
Does this rate as better to you or is it still a no no?

A:

Although they're related questions, they're not the same question, and each will have different answers. Splitting them into separate questions seems entirely logical and consistent to me.
Question one is about what publishers are out there specialising in fantasy books. Question two is about whether there are agents out there specialising in fantasy. Question three is about editors specialising in fantasy, and whether it's necessary. Question four is about the audience of fantasy books. Question five is about fantasy resources.
The only thing really bundling these questions together is the fact that they're about the "fantasy" genre.
I mean, where do you draw the line? I have ten questions about characterisation, does that mean I can post a single question with ten questions because they're all related?
As presented, they should be separate questions on the site.

A:

If you think the question would have to fit under the old-school Stack Overflow "this is community wiki, so don't close it!" rules, it's not a good fit for our site.  We want our questions to fit the new guidelines, not the old ones.  We want them specific, discussable in depth, and answerable.  We want to be able to vote on the answers.
That's exactly why a "mega" question will fail.  How do you vote on an answer that perfectly answers just 3 of the five questions but leaves the other two untouched?  Is it better or worse than one that somewhat answers all five?  What about if an answer is the canonical, best-for-all-time answer to just one?  How will the question asker choose which answer gets the check mark?  It's not a fit for our system.  It needs to be less vague and more cohesive.
Even in written exams, which you compare a question on Writers to, you'll notice that teachers and professors usually have a set number of points for each sub-question that totals the number of points for the overall question.  That's how a teacher can make sub-questions work fairly for all students.  In writers we can't give out partial accepted answers or partial votes, so it just isn't a comparable model.

A:

I had to close this. It is completely unanswerable in its current format.
It's not a question to "fix" but one to re-post, if the author so wishes. In the meantime, leaving the question open will lead to wasted efforts as users are guessing what the question will actually be while you debate here.
Here is the comment I posed as a closing justification:

I have to close this as unanswerable in this multi-question format. A big part of this site is the vetting (voting) of the answers and this solicits many answers in a single post. It's necessary that questions contain a specific, detailed, answerable question. (1)(2)(3) could conceivably be combined into one useful question. (4) is at least somewhat answerable if you're looking for readership statistics. (5) Is way too broad; Asking for a list of resources isn't really what we do here. A list of "things to consider" would be nebulous. Better to ask specific problems you are trying to solve.

