Why has Charlie Sheen 'gone off' in such spectacular fashion? Admittedly, it's not exactly unusual for a Hollywood star to go on a drink and drug-fuelled 'bender' and end up in rehab, but for most of them that's usually the extent of the acting out. Charlie Sheen however appears to be in a different category. While he has an alleged history of drink and drug abuse dating back to 2005, his dramatically swift fall from grace really began late last year when he was arrested for causing $7000 worth of damage to a hotel suite during a weekend of drugs and prostitutes. Since then, his behavior has grown increasingly bizarre and, most recently, he seems to have adopted a 'god complex' that does not appear to be dependent on, or fueled by, any substance abuse (although there is obviously a strong possibility of him being bipolar).

Here are a few snippets of his recent public comments:

This isn't the first time that Sheen's personal life and beliefs have been the focus of media scrutiny and used as an opportunity to push an agenda. Back in 2006 he began to voice his opinion that the official story of the 9/11 attacks did not make sense and questions remained unanswered:

Obviously, the topic I am broaching here is the possible link between Sheen's public stance on 9/11 and his subsequent psychological collapse and the media portrayal of him (with good reason) as being 'crazy'. Despite what many think, the idea that Sheen may be the target of surreptitious psychological interference by those who would prefer he keep his mouth shut about the 9/11 attacks is a reasonable one:

Project MKULTRA, or MK-ULTRA, was the code name for a covert, illegal CIA human research program, run by the U.S. Office of Scientific Intelligence. This official U.S. government program began in the early 1950s, continuing at least through the late 1960s, and it used U.S. and Canadian citizens as its test subjects.

The published evidence indicates that Project MKULTRA involved the use of many methodologies to manipulate individual mental states and alter brain functions, including the surreptitious administration of drugs and other chemicals, sensory deprivation, isolation, and verbal and sexual abuse. While the CIA claims that MKULTRA-type experiments have been abandonded, 14-year CIA veteran Victor Marchetti stated in various interviews that CIA mind control research continued. In a 1977 interview, Marchetti specifically called the CIA claim that MKULTRA was abandoned a "cover story."

Then there is this from a Cassiopaean session of July 1995:

Q: (L) Do any of the STS beings have the ability to cause us physical problems, or mental or emotional problems when not in direct contact with us?

A: Certainly.

Q: (L) How is this done?

A: A number of different methods used.

Q: (L) Could you give us one or two examples of how this is done?

A: There are many: sound wave manipulation of the ultra-high frequency range would be one.

Q: (L) What do these sound waves in the ultra-high frequencies do?

A: They can alter chemical balances within the body of the subject, thereby also the brain, using the physical path to cause distress by altering these chemical imbalances into place.

Q: (L) Do these ultra-high frequency sound waves ever carry messages in terms of pre-coded suggestions that are triggered by these waves?

A: Messages are not carried in ultra-high frequency sound waves. Now, you are talking about an entirely different method. Sound wave focusing is designed to alter body and brain chemistry in order to alter such things as physical sensations, emotions, and so forth, which then may lead to the altering of mental thought patterns. But messages are not sent by ultra-high frequency sound waves. Messages are sent by something called Free Formal Imaging.

Q: (L) And what does that describe?

A: That describes the transference of thought. [...]

Q: (L) Okay. Can it be sent to a directed target?

A: Absolutely.

If, as a result of his stance on the official version of 9/11, Charlie Sheen has indeed been targeted in one of the ways described above, he probably isn't the first. Consider the case of former MI5 agent David Shayler. In early 1996 Shayler became aware of an MI6 plot to assassinate Libyan leader Muammar al-Gaddafi in February 1996 without the permission of the then foreign secretary Sir Malcolm Rifkind. The plan involved paying £100,000 to the (officially 'terrorist' and 'al-Qaeda-linked') Libyan Islamic Fighting Group to carry out the attack. The group was paid to plant a bomb underneath Gaddafi's motorcade but the bomb was planted under the wrong car and failed to kill Gaddafi and instead killed several innocent civilians. Shayler then left MI5 and became a 'whistle blower'. Over the next 10 years he made efforts to expose the lies about the war on terror, the 9/11 attacks and the London train bombings.

Here he is on the UK's Sky News in 2006:

Within a year of the above interview, Shayler had taken an unfortunate 'turn' that is not dissimilar to that taken by Sheen:

Today, Shayler calls himself both "Messiah" - born out of his belief that he can save humanity - and also "Delores Kane" - his transvestite other self, a role for which he dons false breasts, mini-skirt and ginger wig.

Shayler told the local weekly paper: "I have realised that I am Christ and I am here to save humanity. In 2012 it is widely predicted that the world will end. It is predicted there will be a massive change in people's consciousness and we will see the end of Babylon and the end of the world as we know it. Jesus was a transvestite.''

Note the comment by the narrator in the last video above that: "many supporters say this turn robs him [Shayler] of his credibility, destroying a reputation for sensible anti-establishment bravery. The path from mainstream whistle blower to 9/11 conspiracy theorist to now self-proclaimed messiah could arguably be a wish come true for the secret services that once tried to gag him."

From this we deduce that, according to the mainstream media, those who disbelieve the official version of the 9/11 attacks are half way down the road to a messiah complex and thus fundamentally unstable, or in danger of becoming so. But I have to admit that it is a little frustrating to see mainstream media journalists flirt so closely with the likely truth of the matter - that in the cases of people like Shayler and Sheen, it is not their opinions or the fact of their 'break-downs' that are most intriguing, but rather the way in which the people who obviously want to see them consigned to the loony bin keep 'lucking out' in the most coincidental ways.

Of course, very few people watching the media coverage of the Sheens or Shaylers of this world will ever consider it anything other than the titillating voyeurism of the sort that passes for television entertainment these days. And keeping the masses distracted while simultaneously ridiculing 'conspiracy theorists' is a job well done for the ruling class of this world. But before you start crediting yourself with a truly open mind because you don't believe the official story of 9/11 and accept that mind control is real and possible, consider this:

Because people have been so programmed, in myriad ways, throughout their whole lives to believe, and believe in, the righteousness of authority, the task of disabusing anyone of the appropriateness of that belief is rather difficult. But when you go down to the level of politics and political persuasions, convincing anyone of anything that runs counter to their cherished political beliefs and identifications becomes virtually impossible.

Politics is closely associated (or dissociated) in many people's minds with nationality, nationalism, family and ultimately, their own identity. Try to convince the average American, for example, that American governments have been a force for evil rather than good in the world, and you immediately challenge in him (or her) a whole host of very personal and dearly held beliefs that extend as far back as their childhood experiences of 'mom and Apple pie'.

Lay out to your British friend all the reasons that the 'Great' in Great Britain is undeserved and he may suddenly be reminded of his grandmother telling him, in harrowing detail, how much she suffered during the London 'Blitz'.

And just try telling the average member of the Jewish diaspora or, if you're feeling particularly brave, an Israeli Jew, how Israel is an apartheid state that was established on stolen land and your point will not only be lost on him, but his mind and emotions will be instantly propelled back to Nazi Germany or, perhaps, some mythical BCE 'parting of the waters' event in the Arabian desert. In short, there's a reason why politics is often on the taboo list at dinner parties.

An excerpt from Barbara Oakley's book Evil Genes explains why in more detail:

A recent imaging study by psychologist Drew Westen and his colleagues at Emory University provides firm support for the existence of emotional reasoning. Just prior to the 2004 Bush-Kerry presidential elections, two groups of subjects were recruited - fifteen ardent Democrats and fifteen ardent Republicans. Each was presented with conflicting and seemingly damaging statements about their candidate, as well as about more neutral targets such as actor Tom Hanks (who, it appears, is a likable guy for people of all political persuasions). Unsurprisingly, when the participants were asked to draw a logical conclusion about a candidate from the other - "wrong" - political party, the participants found a way to arrive at a conclusion that made the candidate look bad, even though logic should have mitigated the particular circumstances and allowed them to reach a different conclusion. Here's where it gets interesting.

When this "emote control" began to occur, parts of the brain normally involved in reasoning were not activated. Instead, a constellation of activations occurred in the same areas of the brain where punishment, pain, and negative emotions are experienced (that is, in the left insula, lateral frontal cortex, and ventromedial prefrontal cortex). Once a way was found to ignore information that could not be rationally discounted, the neural punishment areas turned off, and the participant received a blast of activation in the circuits involving rewards - akin to the high an addict receives when getting his fix.

In essence, the participants were not about to let facts get in the way of their hot-button decision making and quick buzz of reward. "None of the circuits involved in conscious reasoning were particularly engaged," says Westen. "Essentially, it appears as if partisans twirl the cognitive kaleidoscope until they get the conclusions they want, and then they get massively reinforced for it, with the elimination of negative emotional states and activation of positive ones." {...}

Ultimately, Westen and his colleagues believe that "emotionally biased reasoning leads to the 'stamping in' or reinforcement of a defensive belief, associationg the participant's 'revisionist' account of the data with positive emotion or relief and elimination of distress. 'The result is that partisan beliefs are calcified, and the person can learn very little from new data,'" Westen says. Westen's remarkable study showed that neural information processing related to what he terms "motivated reasoning" ... appears to be qualitatively different from reasoning when a person has no strong emotional stake in the conclusions to be reached. ﻿

To the above we would add that, other than it being a painful process, the reason a person does not change their fundamental beliefs when confronted with conflicting information, even if that information can be proven to be true, is that there isn't enough motivation or 'reward' for them to make the effort. If there were, they would 'bite the bullet' and do it.

The simple fact is that politics and political activism - trying to change anything by chasing down and exposing the crimes of political leaders - is now a dead end street (if indeed it hasn't always been so). The entire political debate from the point of view of 'truth-tellers' has long since been co-opted by (sometimes paid) hysterical shills and noise makers. At this point in human history, with a sixth extinction looming, knowing that Henry Kissinger or George Bush, or Tony Blair or Barak Obama (for just a few of many examples) are degenerate apes, inveterate liars and psychopathic nut jobs to boot, will do nothing to stave off the encroaching cyclical cosmic catastrophe that threatens the very existence of man and ape alike.

While some readers have theorized that Sott.net's recent change in focus from politics to the coming earth changes etc. was a protective measure due to the dangers posed by exposing political skulduggery, let us just say that this is not the case. In fact, it is our understanding that the powers that be are only too happy to have those with a penchant for truth-telling should, on the eve of major earth changes, waste their energies on efforts to correct an historical slate that will soon be wiped clean anyway.

The time for wrangling over the rights or wrongs of politics, modern or historical, has passed. It's time (or rather long past time) to focus our efforts on bringing into sharp relief the fact that the clock is ticking down on human life on planet earth. At stake are not just our political persuasions, cultural identifications or childhood memories, but rather the entire past, present and future of (potentially) all life on earth. Of course, convincing people of this view of reality is unlikely to be a walk in the park. Unlike politics, or political history with its phony dialectic, when it comes to cosmic catastrophe, there is no earthly authority to be aligned with or appealed to in order to save our skins. The great cosmic mix-master cares not if you are a Republican, a Democrat or a 9/11 'truther'. Of course, the idea that we, as a species, are facing some form of mass extinction (and that it is a cyclical phenomenon) goes against everything we have been told by our scientists and historians about our planet and place in the cosmos. So in the same way that people find it almost impossible to reason rationally when presented with conflicting and seemingly damaging statements about their political candidate, people will find it difficult to accept the rather 'damaging' idea that their cozy existential beliefs are ill-founded.

But here we find the one important difference between politics and impending earth changes: in politics, there is 'my party' and 'your party', a 50/50 chance of 'victory' and therefore not much motivation to break free from emotional reasoning. But with the idea of global cataclysm, we're all in the same boat, existentially speaking, and I'd wager that, on the emotional pain meter, the threat of being wiped off the face of the earth trumps having to accept that Bush lied (for example). For this reason, spreading the word about the strong (and growing) evidence for an approaching extinction level event on earth is vastly more important than chasing illusions about bringing some ignorant political evil-doer to the world court, or penning editorial pieces about the dire state of the economy. Simply stated, the time for all of that has passed. The lights are soon to go out across planet earth, and if we are to survive (or even mitigate the extent of the catastrophe) as many people on this planet need to sit up, take notice, re-prioritize and understand that we are all being stalked by something decidedly wicked.

An established web-based essayist and print author, Quinn has been writing incisive editorials for Sott.net for over 10 years. His articles have appeared on many alternative news sites and he has been interviewed on several internet radio shows and has also appeared on Iranian Press TV. His articles can also be found on his personal blog JoeQuinn.net.

Reader Comments

I watched Sheens craziness last night, wondering what the heck was happening with him. And, just as you say, I had to chalk the coverage up to that voyeurism that has become a staple of television. I didn't know he'd started talking about 9/11.

And as for David Shayler... WTH? I remember when he became a whistle blower; I remember seeing him on the news exposing the government. But I never saw his melt-down. That was shocking!

In response to Waltew's question, couple things--I'm not rich and famous, but I am vocal and articulate and, like lots of others, have experience in being "gas lighted." For a nobody like me it would seem an huge waste of manpower, what with all the scurrying around behind the scenes it takes to drive a fellow mad. Thing is, the scurriers LIKE it, and'll work for free. They really enjoy the power and Brown-Shirt group-fun. Second thing is, fascist waves always seem to hit along side of massive new technologies. Now imagine all the scurriers able to communicate and send photos of their "mark" incessantly and relentlessly.

Little while of that'll soften a fellow right up. There's a lot of disinfo out there, but if you're curious about this phenomena and the experience of "Targeted Individuals" then do a search on TI's or "Organized Stalking." Anyways, from there they might deploy some expensive equipment to program their mark. Usually though, the isolation, paranoia and sleep deprivation are sufficient to unleash some inner anti-social mechanisms. Once you figure out how they want you to act, they let you know by reducing the pain. This is just my experience, others have explained it better. Thanks for asking.

Fantastic work Joe, and very insightful. The picture of Shayler dressed up as Jesus the Transvestite reminded me of a similar picture I recently saw of Julian Assange dressing up as an old woman in an effort to keep himself concealed from people he believed were after him from the alphabet soup lack of intelligence agencies.

So I got to thinking about Assange's recent behaviour, his often and increasingly non-sensical outbursts and diatribes which leave many wondering juts what the hell he was saying or what he meant. This in turn reminded of another thing I read just yesterday about Assange seeking to trademark his name for use in public speaking services and entertainment services, which is reminiscent of similar attempt to do this by Sara Palin and her daughter Bristol. What struck me is that similar to Sheen and Shayler before him, it seems his behaviour is becoming more erratic, the more publicity he gets, and his recent behaviour is not the type of behaviour we would expect to see from such a prominent whistleblower, who was at one time, level and grounded enough to help put together the Wikileaks project and be a threat to the PTB or status quo. Are we seeing the same type of mind control being exerted on Assange, through excessive egotism/narcissism (think about his recent book deals, and the trade marking of his name), and the accompanying bizzare and somewhat erratic behaviour now being displayed through Assange? I can’t help feeling that there is a similar pattern forming to the one that Joe has shown us above.

I think this very creative man is FURIOUS with his nation for believing lies, being hypocritical, having no real social conscience and for wanting to behave as if everything is "normal", while denying reasoned arguments and labeling them conspiracy theories without evidence. If he was a rock star in the sixties trashing a hotel room would have been expected of him. He is wild. So is Ozzy Osbourne. Charlie Sheen is just more articulate than Ozzie.

Taking on the " invisible government" as publicly as he has done makes him a prime target for subtle interference and media ridicule. Ask David Icke about that one. Victor Hara had his guitar playing hands cut off by his government for singing critical political songs. In the modern Western World, painting the Truthful Opposition as a set of mad conspiracy theorists is standard practice. When that does not work targetting their sexuality to hype up immorality or oddity is also standard practice. Beethoven also used to have rages and most truly creative people are labelled bi-polar by those who never think for themselves, feel within remarkably small, socially defined parameters and administer huge amounts of drugs for MONEY.

Charlie Sheen is doing what Marlon Brando did when he tried to highlight the plight of the Native American Peoples in present day America. He is taking on the might of the Right wing who wish to hold us all to ransom, buy up all Land and control all the water supplies. They cause the wars they claim to be struggling to end. He needs protection and support. If he is not silenced or his opinions ignored as ravings they will kill him and call it an accident. They can make it look like a heart attack or drug induced suicide or murder by a madman.He needs help to stabilise if he has been energetically strafed, so that he can find an even more coherent way to communicate with those who truly care for Freedom and Democratic processes.Beloved Be.

I suspected that something like this was going on when Shayler had his "turn", its the perfect revenge. Most Brits these days are not happy about the "Great" in Great Britain, it was my parents generation that was very keen on this and I am 60! Most of us are embarrased by our revolting colonial past, those of us that think anyway. The only people who would get upset today about this are members of the British National party who tend to wrap themselves in the flag (most people hate them), and the far right of the Tory party, (who are ghastly folk!) The UK sounds much cleaner.

I think you might be over-estimating the strength of the programming on this one. From personal experience, I'd say those Britons that do not feel pride in the 'greatness' of their history are few and far between.

"From personal experience, I'd say those Britons that do not feel pride in the 'greatness' of their history are few and far between."

Depends where you go and who you talk to, but the phrase "Great Britain" hasn't been in common parlance since the Sixties.

Mainly there's just ignorance. At the far end of the spectrum, I'd wager that not one card carrying member of The so-called English Defence League has heard of either William Blake or Vaughan Williams, definitely never heard of the opium wars, and I'd guess the majority of them have probably never even heard of Margaret Thatcher (gawd rot her).

Whilst "Great Britain" to me, sounds overly puffed up and sabre-rattley, "UK" sounds like a carpet showroom in an anonymous business park.

Geoffrey of Monmouth in his pseudohistorical Historia Regum Britanniae (c. 1136) refers to the island of Great Britain as Britannia major ("Greater Britain"), to distinguish it from Britannia minor ("Lesser Britain"), the continental region which approximates to modern Brittany.

So if you refer to the UK as Great Britain, then you're showing a lack of knowledge of geography as well as history.

I think you're missing the point. The comment about the "Great" in "Great Britain" was used to illustrate the point that many people in countries like the US, UK, Israel, (in this case the UK) will NOT take kindly to it being suggested that the history of their country is something to be ashamed of rather than proud of. By definition, those reading this site are probably people who are more aware of the reality of British, US and Israeli history, but there are many (I would suggest a majority) who have been successfully programmed via their upbringing, schooling and cultural programming of all sorts to be proud of their country and 'heritage'.

What good can come of criticizing the history of a nation that no longer plays a part in our lifes. Nobody was free in the past and nobody is free now. The most liberal of you who are disgusted by the actions of Great Britains past, should you have been born during that period. No doubt they would be the same people commiting ghastly deeds by todays standards.All that people need are the right circumstances to commit the right actions required.

The hypocrisy of civilised culture in believing they are far removed from the actions of 'others' either now or the past is laughable.

Must say Im amazed, I havent met anyone who is proud of our history or thinks we are "Great" since I was at public school, (of course it was dinned into us there!) We are a second rate country which seems to dwell on a fantasy past and are told we have the "best" health service, the "best" police force and so on ad infinitum, you just have to live here to realise the total crap we are fed, as for the royals, well, the word Odious springs to mind. Compared to the rest of Europe we are backward, living pipe dreams of our specialness. I wish we would grow up.

That is what have me concerned this last months, and been unable to present it to my relatives or friend; the reasons been explained in a straight way in this direct article.

Thank you, I hope it will appear in spanish page, so I could link it to them ( I read with a dictionary at hand, or some times neverminding some words provided that I´m not loosing the real meaning of what is intended to share as a whole ).

I remember a few years ago now during a crucial period of my life at the time, waking up one morning with whispers my mind telling me that I was great and glorious, far smarter than all those around me, that I was the teacher, etc.

What a laugh! It helps to remain solidly aware of your inner fool and maintain your ability to mock yourself.

Whatever it was left the room in a startled flurry.

Everybody who works in the right way will have something to offer. We are all teachers, all students, and the "Fifteen minutes of Fame" thing might, I think, have originally been intended as a suggested healthy limit and not a general observation!

Give him a break - he has been brave to speak out publicly about 911 etc. and risk his lucrative career - not may in his position will do this.

Remember David Icke going a bit loopy, claiming 'messiah' status on Wogan ? Most people hold him in high respect now. Personally I think of him as a hero.
[Link]
Too much attention anyway on this MINOR news story anyway. The real story is not about the messenger himself...

Charlie Sheen has gatherd quite a following around the net. Alot of anonymous image boards not only seem to poke fun at his actions but at the same time a common thing to see is people saying "I can't help but actually agree with him". It seems some people, rather than believing hes gone completely off the deep end are finding respect for his sheer honesty in what he has to say.

There is a possibility that if action was taken against Charlie Sheen it has backfired and made certain people more aware. So should Charlie Sheen completely lose it, at least it is not in vain.

Thanks for the insightful article and the reminder of the cyclical catastrophes and the next extinction level events that are upon us. If enough people DO sit up, take notice, clean the garbage out of themselves physically, mentally/emotionally, and spiritually, get focused and active to network and spread the word of our REAL situation and how we're all in the same boat -- that the pathologically influenced egotism of every man for himself is the LEAST appropriate stance -- then perhaps the cyclical cataclysm that mirrors the human experiential cycle can be ameliorated, and who knows even a MUCH better outcome can result than seems likely now.

If enough people can pull that off, accepting, understanding, and spreading Truth with the central intent of help others, all who sincerely want this type of help and also want it to spread, perhaps the human suffering and chaos can be reduced in an accelerated way and result in averting total destruction on the planet.

when altering a persons bone fide self as has been written about here and in the Greenbaum address, there is left an essence that is percieved by others...if one takes genetically modified food one finds the same effect here....the nature of our "natural" world and of ourselves is not one to be altered by ourselves without there being a result that is observed as well as percieved.

The fact that the article produces an element of evidence that people are unable to change their view in respect of a political beleif speaks volumes and that the heredity of this implies that the world history of Homo sapiens sp has been one of a pre- developed culture that was intended to have certain results.

Whilst we are all aware of our desire to live in peace and happiness, there is this biological fault, the human San Andreas fault that trips the human into seismological reaction with stupendous results.

It is above all very clear that the human use of mind alteration for evil ends exhibits the level of our siesmic fault...the truth that the "authorities" give a damned for what the writer said about...talking of truths and showing up political corruption is clear evidence that the PTB are just that a -power that be- through the perpetual manipulation of the inherent naivite of the human race.

As far as great Britain is concerned, all the comments forgot to mention that the country in question is England & the English not Britain & the British....you can thank the churlish for that.

So when the big day comes and the rock gives us 4 seconds of realisation, one can feel good that on the surface, the meek shall inherit the earth and the rich shall be crushed to oblivion in their bunkers. If any should escape to further survive their chances on the outside will be nil....including Gods Chosen folks too.

to grok impending collapse of everyday life. If a global catastrophe* follows in very short time, no one will feel guilty about that:

"[..], according to the mainstream media, those who disbelieve the official version of the 9/11 attacks are half way down the road to a messiah complex and thus fundamentally unstable, or in danger of becoming so."

No one will worry about being in danger loosing their sanity, because *it will be a daily fact that masses of people running around in panic will have lost their sanity.

In case of chaos because fights for drinking water, fighting for food, then people eating each other: no one will worry about politicians anymore.

Add the Black Death from medieval times and picture disintegrated people in a way more far-gone state than Sheen or Shayler.

The only solution is i think to heal those masses who respond to healing attempts:

Eiriu Eolas introduced to as many as possible. It has the same strength acting on people - as the power the psychopath politicians use to place the shackles on everybody's necks, only EE is destined for the liberation of mankind in spirit, mind and body.

Do you really think the Native Americans or the Australian Aborigines wanted our type of 'civilisation'? Might makes right? If you're bigger and stronger and someone has something you want it's alright to kill them and take it ! That's not civilisation,but that is us ,regrettably, to this day.

"What good can come of criticizing the history of a nation that no longer plays a part in our lifes. Nobody was free in the past and nobody is free now."[QUOTE}

The issue transcends the nation because as a people are still at it. Being familiar with that history can help shred light on what today's wars are really about. Showing that White English speaking people have along history stealing resources (even entire continents) at the point of a gun can help people to that these wars are really about oil. When you know the history it's difficult to believe these wars are about 'protecting' our freedom.

PS. I've often thought perhaps Icke doesn't really believe his shape shifting reptile stuff and only includes it to make it easy for him to be discredited. That way TPTB don't need to deal with him. I wonder if something similar may be going on with Sheen. He is an actor you know.

I think there is a point being missed here referring to what Joe has said. Yes Sheen, Shayler and many others are completly screwed up now due to some form of mind manipulation and basic lose of self, some may disagree and think they are on the right path because they meditate but going from a positive speaker and one with pride and passion to a dribbling idiot thinking they are a God is totally messed up. The rabbit hole is deep but I think the main focus now is the fact that there are meteors and activity from the sun that gives an impending doom on humanity which needs to be addressed. We can launch the Discovery into space for one last trip and eveyone goes whoo, it is great but what are people doing to compose themselves for the inevitable future? Just on mind manipulation I happened to watch the horrendously sickening latest video produced by the lucifarian record company for Lady, I had to write it Gaga or should I say blah blah or baa baa. Watch it, I laughed they really do think we're dumb! But then again they have good reason to think that and the video isn't for our eyes, the target audience is children, makes me want to hurl...

Very true, you do not gain and anybody , anyting about who is right or who is wrong talking about politics, because you do not need to argue, facts are there, you decide to believe them or not, its like taking someone to see that all the catholic beliefs are wrong, so little Jeohva does not exist. What you get is to die as Hamlet does in his story when he tries to kill his uncle and defeat the evil governmen or whatever you want to call it.