Pages

Wednesday, July 23, 2014

As some of you may know, JA Rock and I have
been advised by our publisher to change the title of our Mark Cooper versus America
sequel, which was called Brandon Mills versus Virginity.
Because Amazon would refuse to list it with that title.

When I mentioned this on Goodreads, a few
people pointed me towards this book:

Why is this book allowed to use the V-word, but we
aren’t? I suspect that it’s all to do with the way this book is tagged. While
this book, for all I know, might be full of sexy good times, it’s not listed as
erotica or erotic romance, so it escapes the cull. Here’s how it’s categorised
on Amazon:

Actually, there is a heap of books on
Amazon with the V-word in the title. There are books about this woman:

And this man:

And this product:

And, yes, even virginity exactly as it
pertains to sexual experience, or lack thereof:

The title, if you can’t read it, is Virginity:
A Treasure. Personally an idea I find more disturbing that a lot of
stuff in erotica (yes, even counting monster porn) but that’s a discussion for
another day.

So what’s the big deal about the word
virginity in our title, Amazon? Brandon Mills is nineteen. He’s an adult, who
happens to be a virgin. It’s not unusual. It’s also not unusual for a nineteen
year old college boy to spend a lot of time obsessing about his status.

What’s frustrating about this, as JA
pointed out in an email, is it’s about sex. It’s fairly obvious that Amazon is
only targeting erotica and erotic romance titles. You don’t see the same rules
being enforced on writers of chainsaw blood-splattering gore, do you? And why
should you? It’s ridiculous. Adults have the right to read what they want to
read.

Except, apparently, when it comes to sex.
Then a quick glance at the title – not the content, mind you, but the title
alone – will allow Amazon to make the decision for you. Because there is
absolutely no content in Brandon Mills that crosses any
boundaries. The sex is consensual, and it’s sweet and funny and awkward.
There’s not even any kink in it! Okay, there’s a mild dinosaur fetish, but
that’s kept out of the bedroom.

Here’s what JA wrote in her email, which
sums it up nicely:

I
think the way they're doing it now does come off as an attack on sex. Because I
don't see the same kind of scrutiny being applied to books in the thriller
genre--notorious for exploitative depictions of maimings and murder and sexual
assaults. So why should a romance that depicts those things--as long as it's in
a negative light--be any different?

Come on over here, double standard. Step
into the light so we can all see you.

And, you know what’s most annoying about
this entire thing? The fact that Amazon pretty much owns the universe. What
Amazon wants, Amazon gets. As much as a part of me wants to says “Fuck you,
Amazon!” and publish only to other retailers…well, that would be a pretty dumb
financial decision. Amazon is the
market.

It would just be nice if the market took
its head out of its arse one day soon.

In the meantime, I hope you'll all enjoy Brandon Mills versus the V-Card when it comes out!

Saturday, July 19, 2014

Here's a flash fiction piece I wrote last year for one of the GR groups. The picture prompt, from what I remember, was a woman in really short skirt and really tall stilettos stalking down a set of steps towards a surprised-looking guy in a suit. I don't remember all the rules, but I know we had to get the word "candle" in there somewhere.

So here's what I wrote. I like to think it's proof that I don't always torture my characters.

Cynthia Montgomery.

She moved as sleekly as a cat, in those high heels,
short skirt, and legs that went on for-fucking-ever. Slinking up the steps like
she was looking to rub herself against the nearest tomcat. Who would be Dan, by
the way.

Poor woman, because what she didn’t know was that all
those hours of effort—of plumping and primping and waxing and buffing—were
completely wasted on Dan. That slightly stunned look on his face? Not befuddled
by lust. He just hadn’t expected to see what his boss had for breakfast.

“Holy shit,” he whispered when I came around with the
tray. “Did you see that?”

“Canapé, sir?” I asked him in my best waiter voice.
Which was as shit as the rest of my technique, to be honest. I’d already
spilled champagne down Brad-from-Accounting’s monkey suit.

“Are you still pissed off about that?”

“What? You mean being a waiter at my own boyfriend’s
swanky corporate gig? No, I’m totally fine with it. Sir.”

Dan made a face. “Look, you know I couldn’t invite you.
Besides, you needed the cash.”

“Oh, fuck off,” I said. “The only reason you didn’t
invite me is because Cynthia fucking Montgomery is sexually harassing you, and
you might get fired if she finds out you’re about as straight as Rock Hudson.”

“I beg your pardon?"

Shit. Cynthia moved as silently as a cat as well, and
had somehow managed to circle us.

“You must be Dan’s boyfriend,” she said, extending a
perfectly manicured hand. “It’s a pleasure to meet you at last. Dan talks about
you all the time.”

Oh fuck. Really? Really?

Dan rolled his eyes. “Cynthia, this is Max, who is
somehow under the impression that I’m not out at work.”

“Um,” I said. “’lo.”

“You look different without your hair all—” She made a
vaguely spiky gesture with her fingers. “I saw your music video, by the way. You’re
very talented.”

“Um.” The canapés wobbled dangerously. “I’m sorry I said
you were sexually harassing Dan.”

“Oh, I am.” Cynthia raised her eyebrows and shot Dan a
teasing look. “But no more than he enjoys.”

Tuesday, July 8, 2014

Which I guess makes it hard for people with no knowledge of
BDSM to form an accurate picture of what it’s all about. And, let’s face it,
what do those letters stand for anyway? It is Bondage, Discipline, Sadism and
Masochism, or is it the compounded Bondage & Discipline, Dominance & Submission, and Sadism and Masochism? And is Sadism and Masochism the same as Sadomasochism?

And what the hell are all those things anyway?

This stuff is complicated. Except where it's not.

So here's where I talk about how it's not complicated. What works for you, works for you. What works for me, works for me. That is seriously as complicated as it gets. As long as everyone involved in any activity -- whether it's BDSM, BASE jumping, or tiddlywinks -- has consented to be there and agreed on the rules beforehand, it really is nobody else's business. See? Simple.

I don’t really want to talk about all the misconceptions
about BDSM out there. Frankly, if you follow my blog and you’re following this
blog hop, you already know what I’m talking about.

But I do think it’s sometimes difficult for people to
consider BDSM without an emotional reaction, whether that reaction is
confusion, or disgust, or shock, or embarrassment. A lot of people don’t like
talking about sex at all. Talking about kinky
sex? Craziness!

But why is it still a taboo for a lot of people to talk
about sex?

I think we’re sometimes afraid to admit our vulnerability. Whenever
we open ourselves to another person, it takes trust. To do that during sex,
when suddenly we’re sharing our imperfect bodies along with our imperfect desires,
is an incredible thing. Add BDSM to the mix, and that trust is magnified.

For me, the attraction of BDSM is not about the kink. It’s
about the trust. Or maybe my kink is
trust.

And trust is always a beautiful thing.

Guys, please click here to go to the hop page, and check out all the other authors joining the hop.