Acknowledging the Impact of Administrative Power in the EU External Action
This Article identifies and explains the different impacts that the administrative activities implementing the Stabilisation Association Process (SAP) and the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) exercise on public power (of the Union and of third countries). Identifying the impact of the administrative power is an important passage in the study of administrative law in external relations, particularly in order to guarantee protection for affected parties. In carrying out such analysis, the Article will also classify the de facto administrative processes that are concealed in the modes of foreign governance constructed by the SAP and the ENP. The impact of the administrative activities implementing the two policies is neither incidental nor unforeseeable. Instead, it is often the outcome of processes that have crystalised over time.
Taiwan's cultural performance and exhibition facilities industry still has considerable capacity for development. The public sector has the output estimate based on the combination of the output and input statistics together. In this case, the problem of duplicate calculation cannot be avoided and the resulting "all-encompassing" expenditure subsidy will not generate maximum economic benefit either. This article proposes to use the methods advocated by Fritz Machlup, Michael Rogers Rubin, Mary Taylor Huber and Elizabeth Lloyd Taylor. That is, from the sources of expenditure side, total output, and set up I-O Table to verify the maximum economic chain effect industry on a forward and backward basis to assist the public sector in focusing on the core development and to use this a reference point for guidance.