I am currently studying Fitch-style natural deduction and I am having trouble proving  $p ∨ (p → q)$ without being given a premise.  Below is something I've tried. But it doesn't seem right at all. I'm only using basic intro/elim rules with LEM.    Help is greatly appreciated :)
I'm having a bit of trouble proving this with the propositional calculus rules.  $$p \lor (p\implies q)$$ Would someone mind helping me and showing which rules they've used with an explanation! Thanks!
The entire  site is blank right now.  The header and footer are shown, but no questions.