Growth and extension have become indispensable for corporate. Mergers and Acquisitions (M&As) are an easy route to achieve the twin objective. Businesses across the corporate world have only two options in hand to expand their operation and gain substantial profits. One way is to grow through internal expansion by means of introducing new technologies, altering the course of operations, enhancing work performance, and establishing new lines of products or services. Through this business grow gradually over time but the new strategy of external expansion has completely changed the business sector across the world. This external expansion takes place in the form of merger, acquisitions, takeovers, and amalgamations, dramatically supporting the globalization of businesses. M&A are value spinners for investors. Present paper tries to compare and evaluate the pre-merger and post-merger scenario of the deals.
We examine the financial performance of firms in the post-Merger and acquisition period for firms listed on the Karachi Stock Exchange by exploring various motives of merger and acquisitions offered by theoretical and empirical literature. Specifically, we explore these motives in the context of the theory of synergy, agency theory and behavioral finance perspectives. Empirical results for agency theory shows the presence of empire building motives that lead to the underperformance of firms in post-merger and acquisition period. The study finds no support for managerial risk aversion hypothesis of agency theory in Pakistani market. Empirical results do not find any evidence to support the presence of managerial hubris or overconfidence proposition but we do find evidence in support of the escalation of commitment hypotheses and its impact on post-merger and acquisition performance.
Blunt trauma abdomen rarely leads to gastrointestinal injury in children and isolated gastric rupture is even rarer presentation. We are reporting a case of isolated gastric rupture after fall from height in a three year old male child.