An Analysis on the Evaluating Defects of the Core Journals in Contemporary China
This study affirms that the evaluating system of academic journals is comparatively fair, rational, sustainable and open. However, there is much to be desired for the system in China which results in many deficiencies. The paper analyzes the current four disadvantages of evaluating the core journals in China and their influence on the development of the Chinese journals of humanities based on such special traits as the realization means of social values, timeliness of the journals of humanities.
This paper presents some preliminary results from an empirical study of 12 Java applications from the Qualitas corpus. We measure the quantity and distribution of exception-handling constructs, and study their change as the systems evolve through several versions.