South Australian Workers Compensation Disputes: from Conciliation to Adjudication and Back Again:
Reforms to workers compensation schemes throughout Australia in the 1980s brought many changes to the substantive entitlements of injured workers, admin istration and funding arrangements. Those reforms also introduced new ways of resolving disputes about entitlements.Tbis paper identifies some of the major factors that influence the design and operation of dispute resolution systems and demonstrates that there is a tendency for such systems to develop in a manner that can be contrary to the original objectives as a result of particular pressures and unanticipated developments. A case study of dispute resolution in South Australian workers compensation in the period 1986 to 1999 provides the empirical detail. Dispute resolution systems are dynamic rather than static. Tbey frequently reflect some of the pressures and conflicts within the workers compensation schemes. The nature of the administration and management of dispute resolution processes at a time of changing statutory requirements, and in the face...
countries with civil law systems such as those in Indonesia, fettered by the dogmatic paradigm led to the application of normative-legal formalities are usually constrained problem. Though many variations of crimes not yet covered by the rule of positive law in this country. Moreover, many legal rules that were tumpan provisions overlap with another rule of law. So it is not uncommon in a world of justice, the judge's decision with regard to the issue raised controversy in the community. If this happens, efforts to conduct groundbreaking law was supposed to be done with the use of methods that are in line with the concept of handling the legal problems that occur. This is important, including in dealing with certain criminal cases, especially criminal pencuciang money using the method of proof process of reversal of the burden of proof (omkering van de bewijslast).