Input: Context Word: acne.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX had to listen to PersonY complain about their acne. _ had no acne because they took good care of their skin.
Sentence 2: PersonX had to listen to PersonY complain about their acne. _ had acne because they took bad care of their skin.


Input: Context Word: acne.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX thought PersonY has unusually oily skin for his age, because _ observes acne on his face frequently.
Sentence 2: PersonX thought PersonY has unusually oily skin for his age, because _ has acne on his face frequently.


Input: Context Word: acne.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX was a teenager with acne and PersonY was a dermatologist so _ received a prescription for medicine.
Sentence 2: PersonX was a teenager with acne and PersonY was a dermatologist so _ gave a prescription for medicine.


Input: Context Word: acne.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX was self-conscious about an acne outbreak so PersonY was consoling them which made _ feel better.
Sentence 2: PersonX was self-conscious about an acne outbreak so PersonY was consoling them which made _ feel helpful.


Input: Context Word: acne.

Output:
Sentence 1: The dermatologist chose PersonX for his research project rather than PersonY because _ had severe acne.
Sentence 2: The dermatologist chose PersonX for his research project rather than PersonY because _ had no acne.


Input: Context Word: acne.

Output:
Sentence 1: When experiencing skin problems and acne, PersonX goes to visit PersonY because _ is a student.
Sentence 2: When experiencing skin problems and acne, PersonX goes to visit PersonY because _ is a dermatologist.


Input: Context Word: fork.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX bent the tines on a fork at the restaurant, and it embarrassed PersonY; _ apologized and tried to bend them back.
Sentence 2: PersonX bent the tines on a fork at the restaurant, and it embarrassed PersonY; _ scolded him and tried to bend them back.


Input: Context Word: fork.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX set their fork down on the plate to indicate to PersonY that they had finished the meal because _ would like the dishes removed.
Sentence 2: PersonX set their fork down on the plate to indicate to PersonY that they had finished the meal but _ already had the dishes removed.


Input: Context Word: fork.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX used a fork to scoop and serve the mashed potatoes to PersonY because _ had utensils.
Sentence 2: PersonX used a fork to scoop and serve the mashed potatoes to PersonY because _ didn't have utensils.


Input: Context Word: narcissist.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX was a narcissist and PersonY was not, so _ cared only about themselves in every decision they made.
Sentence 2: PersonX was a narcissist and PersonY was not, so _ cared primarily about others in every decision they made.


Input: Context Word: narcissist.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX was a narcissist, so PersonY always had to talk about _ when they were together.
Sentence 2: PersonX was a narcissist, so PersonY never got to talk about _ when they were together.


Input: Context Word: real estate.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX brought up the subject of real estate to PersonY because _ was interested in selling a house.
Sentence 2: PersonX brought up the subject of real estate to PersonY because _ was interested in buying a house.


Input: Context Word: real estate.

Output:
Sentence 1: Unfortunately, PersonX lost all his money when the real estate market crashed while PersonY did not because _ invested all his money in real estate.
Sentence 2: Unfortunately, PersonX lost all his money when the real estate market crashed while PersonY did not because _ invested none of his money in real estate.


Input: Context Word: Bamboo.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX was a proffesional landscaper for PersonY so _ picked out a nice bamboo garden.
Sentence 2: PersonX was a proffesional landscaper for PersonY so _ picked out a horrible bamboo garden.


Input: Context Word: wood doors.

Output:
Sentence 1: Cleaning wood doors is enjoyable for PersonX but not PersonY because _ is okay with easy work.
Sentence 2: Cleaning wood doors is enjoyable for PersonX but not PersonY since _ is not okay with tedious work.


Input: Context Word: wooden.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX is a carpenter, PersonY is not therefore _ will know about how to install wooden molding.
Sentence 2: PersonX is a carpenter, PersonY is not therefore _ may not know about how to install wooden molding.


Input: Context Word: campfire.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX showed PersonY how to build a campfire because _ had been camping several times before.
Sentence 2: PersonX showed PersonY how to build a campfire because _ had never been camping before.


Input: Context Word: moments.

Output:
Sentence 1: The moments in PersonX's life are filled with embarrassment, but things always work out for PersonY. _ is more awkward.
Sentence 2: The moments in PersonX's life are filled with embarrassment, but things always work out for PersonY. _ is luckier.


Input: Context Word: legal.

Output:
Sentence 1: Being comfortable in the courtroom reading legal briefs was normal for PersonX but not PersonY because _ was a lawyer.
Sentence 2: Being comfortable in the courtroom reading legal briefs was normal for PersonX but not PersonY because _ was a paralegal.


Input: Context Word: legal.

Output:
Sentence 1: Legal terms baffle PersonX, while they are easy for PersonY to comprehend. _ is a baker.
Sentence 2: Legal terms baffle PersonX, while they are easy for PersonY to comprehend. _ is a lawyer.


Input: Context Word: legal.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX had to hire a lawyer even though PersonY was able to represent themselves because _ doesn't have any legal experience.
Sentence 2: PersonX had to hire a lawyer even though PersonY was able to represent themselves because _ has some legal experience.


Input: Context Word: legal.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX kept getting into legal trouble almost daily instead of PersonY, so _ was broke.
Sentence 2: PersonX kept getting into legal trouble almost daily instead of PersonY, so _ was rich.


Input: Context Word: legal.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX was seeking a lot of legal advice from PersonY so _ asked questions about contract law.
Sentence 2: PersonX was seeking a lot of legal advice from PersonY so _ answered questions about contract law.


Input: Context Word: legal.

Output:
Sentence 1: When PersonX is in legal trouble, they go to PersonY because _ is a criminal in the court house.
Sentence 2: When PersonX is in legal trouble, they go to PersonY because _ is an attorney in the court house.


Input: Context Word: faux fur.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX is against wearing faux fur and but Persony enjoys wearing it, _ is a animal activist.
Sentence 2: PersonX is against wearing faux fur and but Persony enjoys wearing it, _ dislikes all animal activist.


Input: Context Word: badminton.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX played badminton more than PersonY so _ was surprised when they lost the match.
Sentence 2: PersonX played badminton more than PersonY so _ was surprised when they won the match.


Input: Context Word: badminton.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX plays badminton but PersonY plays baseball, so _ hits a birdie in their sport.
Sentence 2: PersonX plays badminton but PersonY plays baseball, so _ hits a baseball in their sport.


Input: Context Word: hemp.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX and PersonY decided to start growing hemp as a side business venture, despite _ knowing nothing about the plant.
Sentence 2: PersonX and PersonY decided to start growing hemp as a side business venture, despite _ knowing nothing about the process.


Input: Context Word: hemp.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX was arrested for growing hemp by the police but not PersonY because _ stayed during the field raid.
Sentence 2: PersonX was arrested for growing hemp by the police but not PersonY because _ fled during the field raid.


Input: Context Word: coyotes.

Output:
Sentence 1: Coyotes ate the dog of PersonX when PersonY left the door open, so _ is very angry.
Sentence 2: Coyotes ate the dog of PersonX when PersonY left the door open, so _ is very apologetic.


Input: Context Word: Carnivorous.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX followed a carnivorous diet but PersonY followed a vegetarian diet. _ ordered the prime rib for their supper.
Sentence 2: PersonX followed a carnivorous diet but PersonY followed a vegetarian diet. _ ordered the grilled portabella for their supper.


Input: Context Word: theory.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX had a better theory than PersonY, so the profession gave _ the highest score.
Sentence 2: PersonX had a better theory than PersonY, so the profession gave _ an average score.


Input: Context Word: retire.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX was ready to retire but PersonY was not able to yet because _ was old.
Sentence 2: PersonX was ready to retire but PersonY was not able to yet because _ young.


Input: Context Word: retire.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX was scheduled to retire from their position at the company before PersonY because _ was older.
Sentence 2: PersonX was scheduled to retire from their position at the company before PersonY because _ was younger.


Input: Context Word: retire.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX will be able to retire a lot earlier than PersonY because _ is further along in their career.
Sentence 2: PersonX will be able to retire a lot earlier than PersonY because _ is further behind in their career.


Input: Context Word: climate.

Output:
Sentence 1: Because PersonX lived in a very cold climate while PersonY lived in a warm climate, _ had to dress in several layers.
Sentence 2: Because PersonX lived in a very cold climate while PersonY lived in a warm climate, _ had to dress in very few layers.


Input: Context Word: climate.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX wanted some coffee, but PersonY decided not to have any because of the hot climate.  _ had some because they didn't care about the temperature.
Sentence 2: PersonX wanted some coffee, but PersonY decided not to have any because of the hot climate.  _ refused it because they didn't like the temperature.


Input: Context Word: Pumpkin.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX baked a perfect Pumpkin pie for PersonY on Thanksgiving night from scratch, because _ is a known good cook.
Sentence 2: PersonX baked a perfect Pumpkin pie for PersonY on Thanksgiving night from scratch, though _ liked seeds much better.


Input: Context Word: hesitant.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX was very hesitant when speaking to PersonY, because _ always tended to say something wrong.
Sentence 2: PersonX was very hesitant when speaking to PersonY, because _ always tended to take things wrong.


Input: Context Word: village.

Output:
Sentence 1: Living in a small village was perfect for PersonX but not PersonY because _ grew up in a rural area.
Sentence 2: Living in a small village was perfect for PersonX but not PersonY because _ grew up in an urban area.


Input: Context Word: quirky.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX had a more carefree personalilty than PersonY so _ was able to be quirky without repercussions.
Sentence 2: PersonX had a more guareded personalilty than PersonY so _ was powerless to be quirky without repercussions.


Input: Context Word: quirky.

Output:
Sentence 1: When PersonX spilled the wine PersonY giggled which gave _ a quirky smile of sympathy and understanding.
Sentence 2: When PersonX forgot the wine PersonY giggled which gave _ a quirky smile of sympathy and understanding.


Input: Context Word: Flute.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX was very bad at playing the flute but PersonY was excellent at it. _ took lessons to learn to play better.
Sentence 2: PersonX was very bad at playing the flute but PersonY was excellent at it. _ didn't need lessons to learn to play better.


Input: Context Word: doctorate.

Output:
Sentence 1: Getting a doctorate was very important to PersonX but not PersonY, so _ applied to get into grad school.
Sentence 2: Getting a doctorate was very important to PersonX but not PersonY, so _ applied to get a job.


Input: Context Word: doctorate.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX is on his final year and asks for help from his lecturer PersonY about doctorate, because _ wants to get a PhD.
Sentence 2: PersonX is on his final year and asks for help from his lecturer PersonY about doctorate, because _ already has a PhD.


Input: Context Word: doctorate.

Output:
Sentence 1: Studying for a doctorate came easier to PersonX than PersonY. _ was a natural born reader.
Sentence 2: Studying for a doctorate came easier to PersonX than PersonY. _ was a natural born procrastinator.


Input: Context Word: coyote trap.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX wanted to set a coyote trap but PersonY insisted not to. _ was terrified with wild animals and wanted them gone.
Sentence 2: PersonX wanted to set a coyote trap but PersonY insisted not to. _ was obsessed with wild animals and wanted them healthy.


Input: Context Word: popcorn.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX asked PersonY to buy her some popcorn at the movies because _ had no money.
Sentence 2: PersonX asked PersonY to buy her some popcorn at the movies because _ had unlimited money.


Input: Context Word: popcorn.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX liked to have sugar on their popcorn but PersonY did not because _ likes sweet things.
Sentence 2: PersonX liked to have sugar on their popcorn but PersonY did not because _ dislikes sweet things.


Input: Context Word: popcorn.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX made a huge bowl filled with rainbow popcorn for PersonY, because _ loves making others happy.
Sentence 2: PersonX made a huge bowl filled with rainbow popcorn for PersonY, because _ loves eating popcorn.


Input: Context Word: popcorn.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX wanted to buy popcorn for the movie while PersonY would only drink water because _ thought popcorn was delicious.
Sentence 2: PersonX wanted to buy popcorn for the movie while PersonY would only drink water because _ thought popcorn was fattening.


Input: Context Word: popcorn.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX yelled at PersonY for not filling up the entire popcorn bucket at the movies.  _ was upset about getting ripped off.
Sentence 2: PersonX yelled at PersonY for not filling up the entire popcorn bucket at the movies.  _ was upset about getting yelled at.


Input: Context Word: deployment.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX had three deployments in the last five years unlike PersonY because _ was still in the military.
Sentence 2: PersonX had three deployments in the last five years unlike PersonY because _ was retired from the military.


Input: Context Word: stayed home sick.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX stayed home sick from school but PersonY did not because _ was in a contagious stage.
Sentence 2: PersonX stayed home sick from school but PersonY did not because _ was feeling a lot better.


Input: Context Word: different types of sentences.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX wanted to teach languages although PersonY was a better teacher. _ couldn't describe different types of sentences.
Sentence 2: PersonX wanted to teach languages although PersonY was a better teacher. _ could always describe different types of sentences.


Input: Context Word: how to pack for college.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX showed PersonY how to pack for college before the first day because _ is a senior in college.
Sentence 2: PersonX showed PersonY how to pack for college before the first day because _ is a freshmen in college.


Input: Context Word: redeem.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX bothered to redeem a ten cent coupon but PersonY did not as _ was very poor.
Sentence 2: PersonX bothered to redeem a ten cent coupon but PersonY did not as _ was very rich.


Input: Context Word: classroom.

Output:
Sentence 1: In the classroom, PersonX is teaching French to PersonY. This is because _ is a good teacher.
Sentence 2: In the classroom, PersonX is teaching French to PersonY. This is because _ is a good student.


Input: Context Word: classroom.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX decorated the classroom for the holidays while PersonY watched. This was because _ was the teacher.
Sentence 2: PersonX decorated the classroom for the holidays while PersonY watched. This was because _ was the student.


Input: Context Word: classroom.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX entered the classroom before PersonY was able to because _ arrived at the school earlier.
Sentence 2: PersonX entered the classroom before PersonY was able to because _ arrived at the school later.


Input: Context Word: classroom.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX taught PersonY in the classroom, because _ was the teacher and spent their time educating.
Sentence 2: PersonX taught PersonY in the classroom, because _ was the student and spent their time learning.


Input: Context Word: Pancake.

Output:
Sentence 1: personx prefers to eat the pancake made by persony because _ had once taste his pancake.
Sentence 2: personx prefers to eat the pancake made by persony because _ had promised to make pancake.


Input: Context Word: Wanting.

Output:
Sentence 1: Wanting a new car was all PersonX thought about as where a new home was all PersonY thought about, _ wants a new vehicle.
Sentence 2: Wanting a new car was all PersonX thought about as where a new home was all PersonY thought about, _ wants a new house.


Input: Context Word: freshman.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX is a freshman and asks for an advice from PersonY, because _ wants to get through the first year.
Sentence 2: PersonX is a freshman and asks for an advice from PersonY, because _ already got through the first year.


Input: Context Word: variety.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX found it easier to be healthy than PersonY because _ ate a wide variety of fruits and vegetables.
Sentence 2: PersonX found it easier to be healthy than PersonY because _ did not eat a wide variety of fruits and vegetables.


Input: Context Word: splurged.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX always splurged more on clothes than PersonY because _ was very into fashion and trends.
Sentence 2: PersonX always splurged more on clothes than PersonY because _ was very into dressing simple.


Input: Context Word: burglar.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX kept guns for protection, but PersonY didn't. _ was terrified of having a burglar or murderer in the house.
Sentence 2: PersonX kept guns for protection, but PersonY didn't. _ was not scared of having a burglar or murderer in the house.


Input: Context Word: thirsty.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX felt very thirsty but PersonY did not feel thirsty. _ bought a bottle of water.
Sentence 2: PersonX felt very thirsty but PersonY did not feel thirsty. _ bought a bag of chips.


Input: Context Word: warning.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX but not PersonY was fired from the job because _ did not heed the supervisor's warning.
Sentence 2: PersonX but not PersonY was fired from the job because _ did heed the supervisor's warning.


Input: Context Word: invited.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX was invited to go to PersonY's home for dinner next week so _ is attending it.
Sentence 2: PersonX was invited to go to PersonY's home for dinner next week so _ is hosting it.


Input: Context Word: flock.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX lived on a farm with PersonY, both wanted to have a flock of chickens especially since _ loved chickens.
Sentence 2: PersonX lived on a farm with PersonY, both wanted to have a flock of chickens especially since _ ate chickens.


Input: Context Word: communicate.

Output:
Sentence 1: It was easy for PersonX but not PersonY to communicate with others because _ was a very good listener.
Sentence 2: It was easy for PersonX but not PersonY to communicate with others because _ was not a very good listener.


Input: Context Word: communicate.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX did not communicate the message to PersonY very well because _ did not speak well.
Sentence 2: PersonX did not communicate the message to PersonY very well because _ did not listen well.


Input: Context Word: communicate.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX didn't know how to communicate properly with PersonY, so _ tried their best to improve their speech.
Sentence 2: PersonX didn't know how to communicate properly with PersonY, so _ tried their best to avoid their conversations.


Input: Context Word: communicate.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX tried to communicate with PersonY about the issue, but _ had no luck with getting answers.
Sentence 2: PersonX tried to communicate with PersonY about the issue, but _ had no interest in giving answers.


Input: Context Word: communicate.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX tries to communicate their feelings to PersonY, but _ isn't used to talking so much.
Sentence 2: PersonX tries to communicate their feelings to PersonY, because _ is used to doing the talking.


Input: Context Word: communicate.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX was able to communicate much better than PersonY because _ spoke the same language as him.
Sentence 2: PersonX was able to communicate much better than PersonY because _ spoke a different language as him.


Input: Context Word: communicate.

Output:
Sentence 1: The crowd listened to PersonX and ignored PersonY because _ knew how to communicate better.
Sentence 2: The crowd ignored PersonX and listened to PersonY because _ knew how to communicate better.


Input: Context Word: insults.

Output:
Sentence 1: When the hecklers started, PersonX was better at ignoring the insults than PersonY because _ was overly sensitive.
Sentence 2: When the hecklers started, PersonX was better at ignoring the insults than PersonY because _ was rarely sensitive.


Input: Context Word: Eat.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX loved junk food but PersonY was a healthy eater, so _ was in a bad shape.
Sentence 2: PersonX loved junk food but PersonY was a healthy eater, so _ was in a good shape.


Input: Context Word: Eat.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX would often eat more than needed to keep from being hungry while PersonY would eat less. _ was found to be obese at their last checkup.
Sentence 2: PersonX would often eat more than needed to keep from being hungry while PersonY would eat less. _ was found to be perfectly healthy at their last checkup.


Input: Context Word: correct.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX was always trying to push PersonY to follow correct grammar, because _ was controlling and anal retentive.
Sentence 2: PersonX was always trying to follow PersonY's correct grammar, because _ was controlling and anal retentive.


Input: Context Word: blocks.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX hollered at PersonY because _ was so mad about the blocks falling over into the lake.
Sentence 2: PersonX comforted PersonY because _ was so mad about the blocks falling over into the lake.


Input: Context Word: blocks.

Output:
Sentence 1: Playing with blocks was fun for PersonX but PersonY preferred playing with dolls. _ became a successful architect.
Sentence 2: Playing with blocks was fun for PersonX but PersonY preferred playing with dolls. _ became a successful designer.


Input: Context Word: talent.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX admired PersonY 's talent so _ offered to cast her for the starring role in her show.
Sentence 2: PersonX admired PersonY 's talent so _ offered to audition for the starring role in her show.


Input: Context Word: talent.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX played the piano in the talent show while PersonY watched from the audience, so _ received a standing ovation.
Sentence 2: PersonX played the piano in the talent show while PersonY watched from the audience, so _ gave a standing ovation.


Input: Context Word: talent.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX tells PersonY regularly they should appreciate their talent and  share it with others, _ has a eye for the talented .
Sentence 2: PersonX tells PersonY regularly they should appreciate their talent and  share it with others, _ has a gift of talent .


Input: Context Word: lifestyle changes.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX helped coach PersonY with multiple positive lifestyle changes so that _ could get paid.
Sentence 2: PersonX helped coach PersonY with multiple positive lifestyle changes so that _ could get better.


Input: Context Word: critical.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX was in critical condition and being helped by PersonY because _ was in an car accident.
Sentence 2: PersonX was in critical condition and being helped by PersonY because _ was an emergency doctor.


Input: Context Word: bullied.

Output:
Sentence 1: In elementary school, PersonX was being bullied by PersonY, so _ went home and cried.
Sentence 2: In elementary school, PersonX was being bullied by PersonY, so _ went home and laughed.


Input: Context Word: bullied.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX is being bullied and asks PersonY for her protection, because _ is thin and small.
Sentence 2: PersonX is being bullied and asks PersonY for her protection, because _ is bulky and huge.


Input: Context Word: bullied.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX is concerned PersonY is being bullied because _ is a school counsellor and knows the signs.
Sentence 2: PersonX is not concerned PersonY is being bullied because _ is a school counsellor and knows the signs.


Input: Context Word: bullied.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX knew their self-worth, but PersonY did not, consequently when being bullied at school, _ was emotionally stable.
Sentence 2: PersonX knew their self-worth, but PersonY did not, consequently when being bullied at school _ was emotionally unstable.


Input: Context Word: bullied.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX often felt bullied at work by PersonY because _ was often yelled at and made fun of.
Sentence 2: PersonX  felt bullied at work by PersonY because _ often yelled at and made fun of him.


Input: Context Word: bullied.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX was tired of being bullied and freaked PersonY out when _ decided to bring a gun to school.
Sentence 2: PersonX was tired of being bullied and freaked PersonY out when _ saw them bring a gun to school.


Input: Context Word: bullied.

Output:
Sentence 1: Since PersonX was bullied more times than PersonY, _ was far more fearful when walking alone.
Sentence 2: Since PersonX was bullied fewer times than PersonY, _ was far more fearful when walking alone.


Input: Context Word: cards.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX dealt the poker cards while PersonY wasn't paying attention, so _  considered cheating.
Sentence 2: PersonX dealt the poker cards while PersonY wasn't paying attention, because _ wasn't worried about cheating.


Input: Context Word: cards.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX still beats PersonY often at cards since _ plays every weekend with a group of friends at the bar.
Sentence 2: PersonX still loses to PersonY often at cards since _ plays every weekend with a group of friends at the bar.


Input: Context Word: stealth.

Output:
Sentence 1: Stealth was something that suited PersonX more than PersonY because _ served in the military.
Sentence 2: Stealth was something that suited PersonX more than PersonY because _ did not serve in the military.


Input: Context Word: selfish.

Output:
Sentence 1: Because PersonX was more selfish than PersonY, _ went out partying and left him with the baby.
Sentence 2: Because PersonX was less selfish than PersonY, _ went out partying and left him with the baby.


Input: Context Word: selfish.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX always took more cake than PersonY to be selfish as _ was very greedy.
Sentence 2: PersonX always took more cake than PersonY to be selfish as _ was very selfless.


Input: Context Word: selfish.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX was a bad friend to PersonY because _ was very selfish and never reciprocated the favors and help she was received.
Sentence 2: PersonX stopped being friends with PersonY because _ was very selfish and never reciprocated the favors and help she was received.


Input: Context Word: selfish.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX was a very selfish individual but PersonY was very generous. _ did not have a lot of good friends.
Sentence 2: PersonX was a very selfish individual but PersonY was very generous. _ had a lot of good friends.


Input: Context Word: Shoelaces.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX had his shoelaces tied every day by PersonY because _ wasn't good at it.
Sentence 2: PersonX had his shoelaces tied every day by PersonY even though _ wasn't good at it.


Input: Context Word: Kenyan.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX's military background was in the Royal Air Force, while PersonY served in the Kenyan Armed forces, so _ is from England.
Sentence 2: PersonX's military background was in the Royal Air Force, while PersonY served in the Kenyan Armed forces, so _ is from Kenya.


Input: Context Word: vegan.

Output:
Sentence 1: Going vegan was more difficult for PersonX than PersonY, because _ was raised on eating lots of meat.
Sentence 2: Going vegan was more difficult for PersonX than PersonY, because _ was raised on eating lots of vegetables.


Input: Context Word: vegan.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX cooked vegan spaghetti with fresh vegetables at the restaurant for PersonY because _ is a chef.
Sentence 2: PersonX cooked vegan spaghetti with fresh vegetables at the restaurant for PersonY because _ is a customer.


Input: Context Word: large.

Output:
Sentence 1: Despite multiple diets, PersonX remains large while PersonY kept  getting slimmer, which makes _ feel like a failure.
Sentence 2: Despite multiple diets, PersonX remains large while PersonY kept  getting slimmer, which makes _ feel like a million bucks.


Input: Context Word: fun.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX doesn't think it is fun when PersonY teases them.  _  gets upset.
Sentence 2: PersonX doesn't think it is fun when PersonY teases them.   _  gets giggly.


Input: Context Word: fun.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX had fun all the time sometimes at the expense of PersonY. _ saw nothing wrong with this.
Sentence 2: PersonX had fun all the time sometimes at the expense of PersonY. _ saw so much wrong with this.


Input: Context Word: fun.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX had fun hiking while PersonY had fun playing console video games, and _ often spent time on trails.
Sentence 2: PersonX had fun hiking while PersonY had fun playing console video games, and _ often spent time on an Xbox.


Input: Context Word: fun.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX wasn't having fun at the circus like PersonY as _ was scared by the clowns.
Sentence 2: PersonX wasn't having fun at the circus like PersonY as _ was entertained by the clowns.


Input: Context Word: kitchen.

Output:
Sentence 1: A new kitchen would be a nice addition for yo to do your cooking in PersonX tells PersonY, _ does not cook.
Sentence 2: A new kitchen would be a nice addition for yo to do your cooking in PersonX tells PersonY, _ is the cook.


Input: Context Word: kitchen.

Output:
Sentence 1: Being a kitchen manager for a restaurant seemed easy for PersonX but not PersonY because _ had gone to culinary school.
Sentence 2: Being a kitchen manager for a restaurant seemed easy for PersonX but not PersonY because _ had not gone to culinary school.


Input: Context Word: kitchen.

Output:
Sentence 1: It was a large sum of money spent by PersonX but not PersonY because _ had the kitchen remodeled.
Sentence 2: It was a large sum of money spent by PersonX but not PersonY because _ did not have the kitchen remodeled.


Input: Context Word: kitchen.

Output:
Sentence 1: On Wednesday night, PersonX looked for PersonY in the camp kitchen, but _ didn't find her there.
Sentence 2: On Wednesday night, PersonX looked for PersonY in the camp kitchen, and _ was there.


Input: Context Word: kitchen.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX asked PersonY to get him some food from the kitchen while he watches the television because _ is hungry.
Sentence 2: PersonX asked PersonY to get him some food from the kitchen while he watches the television because _ is idle.


Input: Context Word: kitchen.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX but not PersonY will be put on punishment because _ broke the glass in the kitchen.
Sentence 2: PersonX but not PersonY will be put on punishment because _ did not break the glass in the kitchen.


Input: Context Word: kitchen.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX has a more enormous kitchen than PersonY because _ lives in a bigger house in the city.
Sentence 2: PersonX has a more enormous kitchen than PersonY because _ lives in a smaller house in the city.


Input: Context Word: kitchen.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX is clumsy and wants to re-organize a kitchen so she asks for PersonY's help, because _ want the job done properly.
Sentence 2: PersonX is clumsy and wants to re-organize a kitchen so she asks for PersonY's help, because _ is good at re-organizing.


Input: Context Word: kitchen.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX spent a lot of time in their kitchen while PersonY did not because _ loved to cook.
Sentence 2: PersonX spent a lot of time in their kitchen while PersonY did not because _ hated to cook.


Input: Context Word: kitchen.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX spent all day cleaning the kitchen so PersonY could cook in it, because _ was a washer.
Sentence 2: PersonX spent all day cleaning the kitchen so PersonY could cook in it, because _ was a chef.


Input: Context Word: kitchen.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX tried to cook breakfast and burned down PersonY's kitchen, so _ was forced to apologize.
Sentence 2: PersonX tried to cook breakfast and burned down PersonY's kitchen, so _ was forced to rebuild.


Input: Context Word: kitchen.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX was an ace in the kitchen but PersonY was a novice, so the tasks typically fell on _ .
Sentence 2: PersonX was an ace in the kitchen but PersonY was a novice, so the tasks typically avoided _ .


Input: Context Word: kitchen.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX was rarely in the kitchen while PersonY constantly was because _ hated to cook.
Sentence 2: PersonX was rarely in the kitchen while PersonY constantly was because _ loved to cook.


Input: Context Word: kitchen.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX was very comfortable in the kitchen but PersonY was very uneasy in it. _ fixed a Sunday roast dinner with ease.
Sentence 2: PersonX was very comfortable in the kitchen but PersonY was very uneasy in it. _ fixed a Sunday roast dinner with a mighty struggle.


Input: Context Word: kitchen.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX's kitchen always looks much nicer and cleaner than PersonY's does, which makes _ very happy.
Sentence 2: PersonX's kitchen always looks much nicer and cleaner than PersonY's does, which makes _ very sad.


Input: Context Word: kitchen.

Output:
Sentence 1: So _ enjoys being in the kitchen because PersonX likes cooking when they are bored and PersonY don't.
Sentence 2: So _ despises being in the kitchen because PersonX likes cooking when they are bored and PersonY don't.


Input: Context Word: kitchen.

Output:
Sentence 1: Working in a restaurant kitchen suited PersonX but not PersonY because _ had gone to culinary school.
Sentence 2: Working in a restaurant kitchen suited PersonX but not PersonY because _ had not gone to culinary school.


Input: Context Word: kitchen.

Output:
Sentence 1: Working in the kitchen came easily to PersonX but not PersonY because _ had trained in culinary arts.
Sentence 2: Working in the kitchen came easily to PersonX but not PersonY because _ had not trained in culinary arts.


Input: Context Word: kitchen.

Output:
Sentence 1: Working in the kitchen was perfect for PersonX but not PersonY because _ went to culinary school.
Sentence 2: Working in the kitchen was perfect for PersonX but not PersonY because _ went to engineering school.


Input: Context Word: cloth.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX was not able to buy the cloth meant for the occasion and PersonY helped him out because _ is broke.
Sentence 2: PersonX was not able to buy the cloth meant for the occasion and PersonY helped him out because _ is generous.


Input: Context Word: paycheck.

Output:
Sentence 1: A steady paycheck is all PersonX can provide PersonY for their services, _ is in need of a steady worker.
Sentence 2: A steady paycheck is all PersonX can provide PersonY for their services, _ is in need of a steady paycheck.


Input: Context Word: mistakes.

Output:
Sentence 1: Being a manager better suited PersonX and not PersonY although _ was much less likely to admit mistakes.
Sentence 2: Being a manager better suited PersonX and not PersonY although _ was much more likely to admit mistakes.


Input: Context Word: mistakes.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX didn't know how to admit their mistakes to PersonY because _ screwed up so many times before.
Sentence 2: PersonX didn't know how to admit their mistakes to PersonY because _ screwed up so few times before.


Input: Context Word: mistakes.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX made more mistakes on the test than PersonY so _ had a lower score.
Sentence 2: PersonX made more mistakes on the test than PersonY so _ had a higher score.


Input: Context Word: mistakes.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX made more mistakes than PersonY when painting the mural, even though _ paid more attention.
Sentence 2: PersonX made more mistakes than PersonY when painting the mural, even though _ paid less attention.


Input: Context Word: mistakes.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX made more mistakes than PersonY while filling out the paperwork, because _ was careless.
Sentence 2: PersonX made more mistakes than PersonY while filling out the paperwork, because _ was careful.


Input: Context Word: mistakes.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX was constantly making mistakes at work but PersonY was not because _ was careless and irresponsible.
Sentence 2: PersonX was constantly making mistakes at work but PersonY was not because _ was careful and responsible.


Input: Context Word: reversed.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX reversed her opinion of PersonY after they were on the same sports team, as _ saw a very different person then.
Sentence 2: PersonX reversed her opinion of PersonY after they were on the same sports team, as _ presented a very different person then.


Input: Context Word: sanctuary.

Output:
Sentence 1: Although he was being prosecuted, PersonX was welcomed into the sanctuary of the church by PersonY because _ was a sinful criminal.
Sentence 2: Although he was being prosecuted, PersonX was welcomed into the sanctuary of the church by PersonY because _ was a priest.


Input: Context Word: parent.

Output:
Sentence 1: According to the judge, PersonX was a better parent then PersonY so _ gained custody of the children.
Sentence 2: According to the judge, PersonX was a better parent then PersonY so _ lost custody of the children.


Input: Context Word: parent.

Output:
Sentence 1: Babysitting three children is more stressful for PersonX than PersonY because _ is not a parent.
Sentence 2: Babysitting three children is more stressful for PersonX than PersonY because _ is a parent.


Input: Context Word: parent.

Output:
Sentence 1: People say that PersonX is a bad parent, but PersonY is a good one. This is because _ is impatient.
Sentence 2: People say that PersonX is a bad parent, but PersonY is a good one. This is because _ is patient.


Input: Context Word: parent.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX asked PersonY's advice about finding a retirement home for their aging parent because _ had no experience of what to do.
Sentence 2: PersonX asked PersonY's advice about finding a retirement home for their aging parent because _ had previous experience of what to do.


Input: Context Word: parent.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX had never been a parent before, but PersonY had five kids, _ needed lots of advice from her.
Sentence 2: PersonX had never been a parent before, but PersonY had five kids, _ offered lots of advice to her.


Input: Context Word: parent.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX had the parental meetings with PersonY after 5:00 pm as _ was early for the first one.
Sentence 2: PersonX had the parental meetings with PersonY after 5:00 pm as _ was late for the first one.


Input: Context Word: parent.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX had to call his parent and leave the house of PersonY, because _ had school the next day.
Sentence 2: PersonX had to call his parent and leave the house of PersonY, because _ wanted to be alone.


Input: Context Word: parent.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX has a harder time than PersonY making important decisions at college because _ doesn't have a parent to turn to.
Sentence 2: PersonX has a harder time than PersonY making important decisions at college because _ has a parent to turn to.


Input: Context Word: parent.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX is a new parent and asks PersonY for an advice on parenting, because _ has recently became parent.
Sentence 2: PersonX is a new parent and asks PersonY for an advice on parenting, because _ has already been a parent for awhile.


Input: Context Word: parent.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX needed comfort from PersonY because _ felt like a terrible parent some of the time.
Sentence 2: PersonX gave comforted to PersonY because _ felt like a terrible parent some of the time.


Input: Context Word: parent.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX was a more patient individual than PersonY so _ was a more understanding parent.
Sentence 2: PersonX was a more patient individual than PersonY so _ was a more frustrating parent.


Input: Context Word: parent.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX was about to become a parent with PersonY so _ was nervous about having children.
Sentence 2: PersonX was about to become a parent with PersonY so _ was excited about having children.


Input: Context Word: parent.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX was trying to be a better parent to PersonY because  _ had bad parents to draw inspiration from.
Sentence 2: PersonX was trying to be a better parent to PersonY but _ had bad parents to draw inspiration from.


Input: Context Word: parent.

Output:
Sentence 1: So _ hated their parent because PersonX was not treated well by them in their childhood and PersonY had a great childhood.
Sentence 2: So _ loved their parent because PersonX was not treated well by them in their childhood and PersonY had a great childhood.


Input: Context Word: parent.

Output:
Sentence 1: The parent grounded PersonX and not PersonY because _ lied about how the glass was broken.
Sentence 2: The parent grounded PersonX and not PersonY because _ told the truth about how the glass was broken.


Input: Context Word: parent.

Output:
Sentence 1: The parent of PersonX is very controlling. PersonY's is very laid back. _ feels a lot of stress in their life.
Sentence 2: The parent of PersonX is very controlling. PersonY's is very laid back. _ feels a lot of calm in their life.


Input: Context Word: parent.

Output:
Sentence 1: The parent of PersonX looked sternly at PersonY because _ had seen the child nearly get run over in the street.
Sentence 2: The parent of PersonX looked sternly at PersonY because _ had nearly run over the child in the street.


Input: Context Word: Countertops.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX hated to clean the countertops in their kitchen but PersonY didn't mind doing it, so _ hired a maid to work for them.
Sentence 2: PersonX hated to clean the countertops in their kitchen but PersonY didn't mind doing it, so _ didn't need a maid to work for them.


Input: Context Word: wishing.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX spent all their time wishing to be with PersonY, because _ was sad and lonely.
Sentence 2: PersonX spent all their time wishing to be with PersonY, because _ was sexy and attractive.


Input: Context Word: apprenticeship.

Output:
Sentence 1: When PersonX applied for an apprenticeship at PersonY's shop, _ knew he had to prepare for a welding test.
Sentence 2: When PersonX applied for an apprenticeship at PersonY's shop, _ knew he had to create a welding test.


Input: Context Word: fundraising event.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX was a very generous person but PersonY was stingy. _ donated a nice sum to the fundraising event.
Sentence 2: PersonX was a very generous person but PersonY was stingy. _ donated a paltry sum to the fundraising event.


Input: Context Word: system.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX rigged the system in their favor to beat PersonY, because _ was never going to win otherwise.
Sentence 2: PersonX rigged the system in their favor to beat PersonY, because _ was never going to lose otherwise.


Input: Context Word: system.

Output:
Sentence 1: The system that PersonX used was amazing compared to PersonY, because _ system was higher end.
Sentence 2: The system that PersonX used was amazing compared to PersonY, because _ system was lower end.


Input: Context Word: system.

Output:
Sentence 1: The system that PersonX used was worse than that of PersonY, because _ company was broke.
Sentence 2: The system that PersonX used was worse than that of PersonY, because _ company was rich.


Input: Context Word: become a software engineer.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX told PersonY about how to become a software engineer because _ went to school for it.
Sentence 2: PersonX told PersonY about how to become a software engineer because _ wanted to go to school for it.


Input: Context Word: Traveling.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX really liked traveling for months at a time while PersonY was more of a homebody. _ often needed to hire a house sitter.
Sentence 2: PersonX really liked traveling for months at a time while PersonY was more of a homebody. _ had no use for a house sitter.


Input: Context Word: Traveling.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX was traveling to Asia and asked PersonY for landmarks to visit because _ had visited many times.
Sentence 2: PersonX was traveling to Asia and asked PersonY for landmarks to visit because _ had never visited it.


Input: Context Word: Traveling.

Output:
Sentence 1: Traveling around the world was  _ dream and this dream was shared by both PersonX and PersonY.
Sentence 2: Traveling around the world was also  _ dream and this dream was also shared by both PersonX and PersonY.


Input: Context Word: photos.

Output:
Sentence 1: Hanging photos of family was important to PersonX but not PersonY because _ didn't see family often.
Sentence 2: Hanging photos of family was important to PersonX but not PersonY because _ saw family often.


Input: Context Word: photos.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX but not PersonY failed the photography class because _ took photos that were inappropriate.
Sentence 2: PersonX but not PersonY failed the photography class because _ did not take photos that were inappropriate.


Input: Context Word: photos.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX wished he was looking at old family photos like PersonY, because _ was sad.
Sentence 2: PersonX wished he was looking at old family photos like PersonY, because _ was happy.


Input: Context Word: photos.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX's photos had a much more refined composition than PersonY's because _ was a better photographer.
Sentence 2: PersonX's photos had a much less refined composition than PersonY's even though _ was a better photographer.


Input: Context Word: photos.

Output:
Sentence 1: Taking photos is a favorite hobby for PersonX but PersonY doesn't like photography. _ bought a new digital camera.
Sentence 2: Taking photos is a favorite hobby for PersonX but PersonY doesn't like photography. _ bought a new television.


Input: Context Word: Compliment.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX rarely complimented the people in their life but PersonY often did, so _ couldn't keep many friends.
Sentence 2: PersonX rarely complimented the people in their life but PersonY often did, so _ could keep many friends.


Input: Context Word: personality.

Output:
Sentence 1: After a rough day at work, PersonX asked PersonY if he had a good personality. _ was having doubts about being a great person.
Sentence 2: After a rough day at work, PersonX asked PersonY if he had a good personality. _ said he was a great person.


Input: Context Word: personality.

Output:
Sentence 1: People like the personality of PersonX, while PersonY is not liked very much. _ is quirky.
Sentence 2: People like the personality of PersonX, while PersonY is not liked very much. _ is distasteful.


Input: Context Word: personality.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX  Is liked well by other were as PersonY is not liked so well by others, _ personality is is tolerable and charming.
Sentence 2: PersonX  Is liked well by other were as PersonY is not liked so well by others, _ personality is is intolerable and not charming.


Input: Context Word: personality.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX loves PersonY so much, _ says that it is due to them having a really positive personality.
Sentence 2: PersonX loves PersonY so much, _ says that it is due to them having a really upbeat personality.


Input: Context Word: personality.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX's personality is more friendly and kind, while PersonY is mean, so _ is probably more outgoing.
Sentence 2: PersonX's personality is more friendly and kind, while PersonY is mean, so _ is probably more introverted.


Input: Context Word: paw.

Output:
Sentence 1: The dog offered its paw to PersonX but not to PersonY because _ looked friendly and kind to the dog.
Sentence 2: The dog offered its paw to PersonX but not to PersonY because _ looked mean and scary to the dog.


Input: Context Word: transfer.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX hated the flatness of the mid-west, PersonY did not therefore _ wanted to transfer to Utah.
Sentence 2: PersonX hated the flatness of the mid-west, PersonY did not therefore _ wanted to transfer to Kansas.


Input: Context Word: transfer.

Output:
Sentence 1: With transfer of money management to frugal PersonX from extravagant PersonY, the presence of _ was immediately felt because the coffee was no longer free.
Sentence 2: With transfer of money management to frugal PersonX from extravagant PersonY, the absence of _ was immediately felt because the coffee was no longer free.


Input: Context Word: mowing.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX was mowing the front lawn quicker than PersonY was mowing the back lawn because _ had new blades in the mower.
Sentence 2: PersonX was mowing the front lawn quicker than PersonY was mowing the back lawn because _ had old blades in the mower.


Input: Context Word: mowing.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX was mowing the lawn of PersonY on the weekend because _ is a great gardener.
Sentence 2: PersonX was mowing the lawn of PersonY on the weekend because _ is a great grandma.


Input: Context Word: short.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX always balanced their checkbook but PersonY never bothered with it.  _ never came up short on money at the end of the month.
Sentence 2: PersonX always balanced their checkbook but PersonY never bothered with it.  _ often came up short on money at the end of the month.


Input: Context Word: obtain.

Output:
Sentence 1: It was easy for PersonX to obtain a pay rise but not for PersonY was _ was very dedicated.
Sentence 2: It was easy for PersonX to obtain a pay rise but not for PersonY was _ was very slothful.


Input: Context Word: obtain.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX was able to obtain a security clearance a lot easier than PersonY because _ had no negative comments.
Sentence 2: PersonX was able to obtain a security clearance a lot more difficult than PersonY because _ had no negative comments.


Input: Context Word: obtain.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX was happy to obtain the property with the help of PersonY, _ was given help.
Sentence 2: PersonX was happy to obtain the property with the help of PersonY, _ was very helpful.


Input: Context Word: Purple.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX decide to dye her hair Purple while PersonY chose a more natural shade because _ was more wild.
Sentence 2: PersonX decide to dye her hair Purple while PersonY chose a more natural shade because _ was more conventional.


Input: Context Word: caffeine.

Output:
Sentence 1: At Starbucks, PersonX chose the espresso and PersonY chose a decaffeinated drink, as _ was intolerant of caffeine.
Sentence 2: At Starbucks, PersonX chose the espresso and PersonY chose a decaffeinated drink, as _ was unaffected by caffeine.


Input: Context Word: caffeine.

Output:
Sentence 1: Having coffee in the morning made sense for PersonX but not PersonY because _ enjoyed the effects of caffeine.
Sentence 2: Having coffee in the morning made sense for PersonX but not PersonY because _ did not enjoy the effects of caffeine.


Input: Context Word: caffeine.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX consumed a lot more caffeine every day than PersonY because _ really liked coffee.
Sentence 2: PersonX consumed a lot more caffeine every day than PersonY because _ did not really like coffee.


Input: Context Word: caffeine.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX doesn't need to drink coffee for the caffeine but PersonY does because ( _ ) got a good nights sleep and is awake.
Sentence 2: PersonX needs to drink coffee for the caffeine but PersonY does not because ( _ ) got a good nights sleep and is awake.


Input: Context Word: caffeine.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX enjoyed his caffeine in the morning while PersonY couldn't handle it so _ had a large cup of coffee every morning.
Sentence 2: PersonX enjoyed his caffeine in the morning while PersonY couldn't handle it so _ had a large cup of water every morning.


Input: Context Word: caffeine.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX has recently stopped drinking caffeine and now has migrens so she asks for PersonY's help, because _ feels miserable.
Sentence 2: PersonX has recently stopped drinking caffeine and now has migrens so she asks for PersonY's help, because _ is a doctor.


Input: Context Word: caffeine.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX wanted to go shopping for a coffee pot as they need caffeine everyday. PersonY wanted to stay in bed longer. _ said I need my coffee.
Sentence 2: PersonX wanted to go shopping for a coffee pot as they need caffeine everyday. PersonY wanted to stay in bed longer. _ said I need my sleep.


Input: Context Word: caffeine.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX was too sensitive to caffeine, but PersonY needs it to wake up, so _ drinks decaf coffee in the morning.
Sentence 2: PersonX was too sensitive to caffeine, but PersonY needs it to wake up, so _ drinks caffeinated coffee in the morning.


Input: Context Word: caffeine.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX's morning routine includes caffeine, but PersonY's does not, so _ has tea in the morning.
Sentence 2: PersonX's morning routine includes caffeine, but PersonY's does not, so _ has water in the morning.


Input: Context Word: stovetop.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX left the stovetop burner on when PersonY came in yelling and found _ passed out from smoke inhalation.
Sentence 2: PersonX left the stovetop burner on when PersonY came in quietly and _ passed out from smoke inhalation.


Input: Context Word: bourbon.

Output:
Sentence 1: Bourbon is the favorite drink of PersonX, while PersonY likes light beer, as a result of _ being a big drinker.
Sentence 2: Bourbon is the favorite drink of PersonX, while PersonY likes light beer, as a result of _ being a light drinker.


Input: Context Word: limping.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX came limping into work but not PersonY because _ had worked out too hard.
Sentence 2: PersonX came limping into work but not PersonY because _ hadn't worked out very hard.


Input: Context Word: calves.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX was jealous of PersonY's calves so _ hit the gym hard to increase his leg strength to catch up.
Sentence 2: PersonX was proud of PersonY's calves so _ hit the gym hard to increase his leg strength to show off.


Input: Context Word: Desperate.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX was desperate to get PersonY's attention at the movie premier because _ was very starstruck.
Sentence 2: PersonX was desperate to get PersonY's attention at the movie premier because _ was very famous.


Input: Context Word: mellow.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX is a lot more mellow than PersonY is because _ is working on stress relief.
Sentence 2: PersonX is a lot more mellow than PersonY is because _ is working on many projects.


Input: Context Word: rainbow.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX once dug at the foot of a rainbow to find a pot of gold but PersonY did not because _ is gullible.
Sentence 2: PersonX once dug at the foot of a rainbow to find a pot of gold but PersonY did not because _ is realistic.


Input: Context Word: symptoms.

Output:
Sentence 1: All the symptoms were present in PersonX but not in PersonY so the doctor gave _ a prescription.
Sentence 2: All the symptoms were present in PersonX but not in PersonY so the doctor gave _ a clean bill of health.


Input: Context Word: symptoms.

Output:
Sentence 1: It is very important that PersonX talk about all of her symptoms to PersonY because _ is a patient.
Sentence 2: It is very important that PersonX talk about all of her symptoms to PersonY because _ is a doctor.


Input: Context Word: symptoms.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX  probably has the flu while PersonY does not because _ has all the symptoms of the flu.
Sentence 2: PersonX  probably has the flu while PersonY does not because _ has none of the symptoms of the flu.


Input: Context Word: symptoms.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX actively chose to ignore all of PersonY's excruciating disease symptoms because _ was cruel.
Sentence 2: PersonX actively chose to ignore all of PersonY's excruciating disease symptoms because _ was sick.


Input: Context Word: symptoms.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX asked PersonY for some cold medicine because _ started experiencing some severe cold symptoms.
Sentence 2: PersonX asked PersonY for some cold medicine because _ stopped experiencing any severe cold symptoms.


Input: Context Word: symptoms.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX brought a list of stomach symptoms he'd experienced to PersonY, but _ forgot to bring them up.
Sentence 2: PersonX brought a list of stomach symptoms he'd experienced to PersonY, but _ never looked at them.


Input: Context Word: symptoms.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX had the symptoms of the flu but PersonY doesn't. _ went to the store to buy some cold meds.
Sentence 2: PersonX had the symptoms of the flu but PersonY doesn't. _ went to the store to buy some tampons.


Input: Context Word: symptoms.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX had worse symptoms than PersonY, so _ was seen by the emergency room doctor first.
Sentence 2: PersonX had worse symptoms than PersonY, so _ was seen by the emergency room doctor second.


Input: Context Word: symptoms.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX makes the classic error of checking their medical symptoms online before going to see PersonY at the clinic, so _ is very wrong about the diagnosis.
Sentence 2: PersonX makes the classic error of checking their medical symptoms online before going to see PersonY at the clinic, but _ is easily able to make the diagnosis.


Input: Context Word: symptoms.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX told PersonY they were having heart attack symptoms, so _ was driven to the hospital immediately.
Sentence 2: PersonX told PersonY they were having heart attack symptoms, so _ drove them to the hospital immediately.


Input: Context Word: symptoms.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX tossed and turned all night long unlike PersonY because _ had all of the symptoms of the flu.
Sentence 2: PersonX tossed and turned all night long unlike PersonY because _ had none of the symptoms of the flu.


Input: Context Word: symptoms.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX was able to catch their sickness earlier than PersonY because _ had telltale symptoms.
Sentence 2: PersonX was able to catch their sickness earlier than PersonY because _ didn't have telltale symptoms.


Input: Context Word: symptoms.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX was able to help PersonY when they were sick because _ knew how to treat their symptoms.
Sentence 2: PersonX was able to help PersonY when they were sick because _ did not know how to treat their symptoms.


Input: Context Word: symptoms.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX was suffering from severe symptoms that PersonY didn't have, because _ had caught the flu.
Sentence 2: PersonX was suffering from severe symptoms that PersonY didn't have, because _ had avoided the flu.


Input: Context Word: symptoms.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX was very worried about PersonY's symptoms so _ wanted them to go to the doctor.
Sentence 2: PersonX was very worried about PersonY's symptoms but _ refused to go to the doctor.


Input: Context Word: symptoms.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX was worried  about the serious symptoms that were obviously affecting PersonY because _ he was having similar ones.
Sentence 2: PersonX was worried  about the serious symptoms that were obviously affecting PersonY  _ who had no similar ones before.


Input: Context Word: symptoms.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX's horse is being treated for symptoms she's been having by PersonY, so _ is a horse rider.
Sentence 2: PersonX's horse is being treated for symptoms she's been having by PersonY, so _ is a horse doctor.


Input: Context Word: symptoms.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX's symptoms have returned, so he goes to visit PersonY at the hospital because _ is sick.
Sentence 2: PersonX's symptoms have returned, so he goes to visit PersonY at the hospital because _ is a doctor.


Input: Context Word: symptoms.

Output:
Sentence 1: The doctor showed that PersonX had symptoms of the disease while PersonY was fine. _ was ill.
Sentence 2: The doctor showed that PersonX had symptoms of the disease while PersonY was fine. _ was healthy.


Input: Context Word: symptoms.

Output:
Sentence 1: The symptoms of PersonX were explained to him by PersonY due to _ being the patient.
Sentence 2: The symptoms of PersonX were explained to him by PersonY due to _ being the expert.


Input: Context Word: food.

Output:
Sentence 1: Because PersonX ate healthy while PersonY ate fast food, _ generally had low cholesterol levels.
Sentence 2: Because PersonX ate healthy while PersonY ate fast food, _ generally had high cholesterol levels.


Input: Context Word: food.

Output:
Sentence 1: Cooking food for the camping trip suited PersonX but not PersonY because _ was a great cook.
Sentence 2: Cooking food for the camping trip suited PersonX but not PersonY because _ was a poor cook.


Input: Context Word: food.

Output:
Sentence 1: For two months PersonX was on a diet while PersonY ate fast food. Afterwards, when they weighed themselves _ was delighted to see a 5 pounds loss.
Sentence 2: For two months PersonX was on a diet while PersonY ate fast food. Afterwards, when they weighed themselves _ was remorseful to see a 10 pounds gain.


Input: Context Word: food.

Output:
Sentence 1: Grocery shopping was difficult for PersonX and PersonY because _ liked spicy food and the other did not.
Sentence 2: Grocery shopping was difficult for PersonX and PersonY because _ liked mild food and the other did not.


Input: Context Word: food.

Output:
Sentence 1: Making delicious food came naturally to PersonX but not PersonY because _ had gone to culinary school.
Sentence 2: Making delicious food came naturally to PersonX but not PersonY because _ had never gone to culinary school.


Input: Context Word: food.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX always eat the food left by PersonY at at table and now _ is fat.
Sentence 2: PersonX always eat the food left by PersonY at at table and now _ is thin.


Input: Context Word: food.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX always ordered the food while at the restaurant for PersonY, as _ was confident.
Sentence 2: PersonX always ordered the food while at the restaurant for PersonY, as _ was shy.


Input: Context Word: food.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX brought food to PersonY's potluck because _ didn't want to be a bad guest.
Sentence 2: PersonX brought food to PersonY's potluck but _ didn't want to be a bad host.


Input: Context Word: food.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX could not deliver the food to PersonY at the expected time and _ is sorry.
Sentence 2: PersonX could not deliver the food to PersonY at the expected time and _ is angry.


Input: Context Word: food.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX could not finish his food and he handed it over to PersonY because _ is filled.
Sentence 2: PersonX could not finish his food and he handed it over to PersonY because _ is hungry.


Input: Context Word: food.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX explained the recipe to PersonY, so _ could demonstrate how to make the food.
Sentence 2: PersonX explained the recipe to PersonY, so _ could learn how to make the food.


Input: Context Word: food.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX felt much worse than PersonY after the party because _ had eaten a lot more of the food.
Sentence 2: PersonX felt much worse than PersonY after the party although _ had eaten a lot more of the food.


Input: Context Word: food.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX felt sick while eating food with PersonY. _ had to go to the bathroom to throw up.
Sentence 2: PersonX felt sick while eating food with PersonY. _ had to go to the bathroom to relieve theirselves.


Input: Context Word: food.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX had fixed a lot of food for PersonY's birthday because _ wanted to throw a good party.
Sentence 2: PersonX had fixed a lot of food for PersonY's birthday because _ wanted to have a good birthday.


Input: Context Word: food.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX has been consuming a lot more food than PersonY recently because _ is not on a diet.
Sentence 2: PersonX has been consuming a lot more food than PersonY recently because _ is on a new diet.


Input: Context Word: food.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX has to be more selective than PersonY when choosing an entree at restaurants because _ has a lot of food allergies.
Sentence 2: PersonX has to be more selective than PersonY when choosing an entree at restaurants because _ doesn't have any food allergies.


Input: Context Word: food.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX hogged all the food from PersonY and _ ended up very full in the end.
Sentence 2: PersonX hogged all the food from PersonY and _ ended up very hungry in the end.


Input: Context Word: food.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX is really hungry for food, PersonY has decided not to make any dinner so _ is disappointed.
Sentence 2: PersonX is really hungry for food,  PersonY has decided not to make any dinner so _ is happy.


Input: Context Word: food.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX liked to eat gourmet food at expensive restaurants but PersonY did not because _ had a very sophisticated palate.
Sentence 2: PersonX liked to eat gourmet food at expensive restaurants but PersonY did not because _ had a very prosaic palate.


Input: Context Word: food.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX made food for PersonY and _ thought to themselves how much better they had gotten.
Sentence 2: PersonX made food for PersonY and _ was impressed with how much better they had gotten.


Input: Context Word: food.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX rejected the food served to him at the party and he passed it to PersonY because _ is sick.
Sentence 2: PersonX rejected the food served to him at the party and he passed it to PersonY because _ is healthy.


Input: Context Word: food.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX took all the food from PersonY because _ was just so hungry she couldn't wait to eat.
Sentence 2: PersonX gave all the food from PersonY because _ was just so hungry she couldn't wait to eat.


Input: Context Word: food.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX was interested in learning about cooking French food so they asked PersonY for advice because _ was a novice in the kitchen.
Sentence 2: PersonX was interested in learning about cooking French food so they asked PersonY for advice because _ was a professional chef.


Input: Context Word: food.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX was sick with the stomach flu and not hungry, but PersonY was starving. _ declined food.
Sentence 2: PersonX was sick with the stomach flu and not hungry, but PersonY was starving. _ ordered food.


Input: Context Word: food.

Output:
Sentence 1: The food PersonX ate caused PersonY to rush them to the hospital despite _ knowing they were fine.
Sentence 2: The food PersonX ate caused PersonY to rush them to the hospital despite _ not knowing they were fine.


Input: Context Word: food.

Output:
Sentence 1: The food at the buffet PersonX wanted to go to was fantastic, but PersonY was allergic to some of it. _ offered to go somewhere else.
Sentence 2: The food at the buffet PersonX wanted to go to was fantastic, but PersonY was allergic to some of it. _ asked if they could go somewhere else.


Input: Context Word: food.

Output:
Sentence 1: The food in PersonX's pantry is plentiful, but this is not so for PersonY because _ is wealthy.
Sentence 2: The food in PersonX's pantry is plentiful, but this is not so for PersonY because _ is poor.


Input: Context Word: food.

Output:
Sentence 1: The food that PersonX ate was spoiled but not that of PersonY because _ left his food outside.
Sentence 2: The food that PersonX ate was spoiled but not that of PersonY because _ left his food in the fridge.


Input: Context Word: food.

Output:
Sentence 1: The food was much better for PersonX than PersonY because _ was able to eat gluten.
Sentence 2: The food was much worse for PersonX than PersonY because _ was able to eat gluten.


Input: Context Word: food.

Output:
Sentence 1: The restaurant served food to PersonX but not PersonY because _ hadn't eaten that meal yet.
Sentence 2: The restaurant served food to PersonX but not PersonY because _ had already eaten that meal.


Input: Context Word: food.

Output:
Sentence 1: While PersonX preferred fast food, PersonY preferred five star restaurants, so therefore _ tended to eat cheap food.
Sentence 2: While PersonX preferred fast food, PersonY preferred five star restaurants, so therefore _ tended to eat expensive food.


Input: Context Word: periods.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX was a much better writer than PersonY so _ always made sure to use their periods correctly.
Sentence 2: PersonX was a much better writer than PersonY so _ occasionally made sure to use their periods correctly.


Input: Context Word: upper respiratory infection.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX managed to avoid an upper respiratory infection that year, but not PersonY, because _ had made sure to get a flu shot.
Sentence 2: PersonX managed to avoid an upper respiratory infection that year, but not PersonY, because _ had made sure to avoid a flu shot.


Input: Context Word: cardboard.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX lived in a cardboard home but PersonY lived in a brick home. _ had their home destroyed in the thunderstorm.
Sentence 2: PersonX lived in a cardboard home but PersonY lived in a brick home. _ had their home undamaged in the thunderstorm.


Input: Context Word: pig feet.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX loved unusual foreign foods but PersonY hated them. _ thought pig feet sounded appetizing.
Sentence 2: PersonX loved unusual foreign foods but PersonY hated them. _ thought pig feet sounded disgusting.


Input: Context Word: dog food.

Output:
Sentence 1: The dog food that PersonX buys is more appealing than that of PersonY as a result of _ choosing one with better ingredients.
Sentence 2: The dog food that PersonX buys is more bland than that of PersonY as a result of _ choosing one with better ingredients.


Input: Context Word: active.

Output:
Sentence 1: It was a active and busy day when PersonX asked PersonY where the post office was located, _ is new to this area.
Sentence 2: It was a active and busy day when PersonX asked PersonY where the post office was located, _ is native to this area.


Input: Context Word: active.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX was trying to get PersonY to become more active because _ wanted them to achieve a more healthier lifestyle.
Sentence 2: PersonX was trying to get PersonY to become more active although _ didn't care to achieve a more healthier lifestyle.


Input: Context Word: engagement ring.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX's engagement ring is smaller than PersonY's happens to be. _ and her husband are poorer.
Sentence 2: PersonX's engagement ring is smaller than PersonY's happens to be. _ and her husband are richer.


Input: Context Word: Disassembling.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX is more mechanically inclined than PersonY, so _ had no trouble disassembling and reassembling the swing set.
Sentence 2: PersonX is more mechanically inclined than PersonY, so _ had much trouble disassembling and reassembling the swing set.


Input: Context Word: Cream.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX used cream while massaging PersonY, but an allergic reaction occurred. _ was sent to the hospital.
Sentence 2: PersonX used cream while massaging PersonY, but an allergic reaction occurred. _ drove him to the hospital.


Input: Context Word: Cream.

Output:
Sentence 1: With the goal to make cream, PersonX called upon PersonYs expertise when _ had no clue what to do.
Sentence 2: With the goal to make cream, PersonX called upon PersonYs expertise however _ had no clue what to do.


Input: Context Word: Rabbits.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX asked to hold and pet the rabbit while PersonY just watched because _ loved rabbits.
Sentence 2: PersonX asked to hold and pet the rabbit but PersonY just watched because _ disliked rabbits.


Input: Context Word: take a pill.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX had to take a pill and PersonY didn't because _ had been sick and took medication.
Sentence 2: PersonX had to take a pill and PersonY didn't because _ had been well and didn't need to take medication.


Input: Context Word: dairy.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX can eat and drink dairy products unlike PersonY because _ is tolerant of lactose.
Sentence 2: PersonX can eat and drink dairy products unlike PersonY because _ is intolerant of lactose.


Input: Context Word: dairy.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX can eat lots of cheese but PersonY can't because _ loves to eat dairy.
Sentence 2: PersonX can eat lots of cheese but PersonY can't because _ is allergic to dairy.


Input: Context Word: dairy.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX could not eat dairy foods such as cheese like PersonY could because _ was sensitive to lactose.
Sentence 2: PersonX could not eat dairy foods such as cheese like PersonY could because _ was tolerant to lactose.


Input: Context Word: dairy.

Output:
Sentence 1: The milk made PersonX sick but never bothered PersonY, since _ was intolerant of dairy products.
Sentence 2: The milk made PersonX sick but never bothered PersonY, since _ was tolerant of dairy products.


Input: Context Word: speech.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX gave a rousing speech that inspired PersonY, so _ succeeded in promoting their ideas.
Sentence 2: PersonX gave a rousing speech that inspired PersonY, so _ decided to help with promoting their ideas.


Input: Context Word: speech.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX gave the most rousing speech PersonY ever heard, because _ is a charismatic person.
Sentence 2: PersonX gave the most rousing speech PersonY ever heard, because _ is a malleable person.


Input: Context Word: speech.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX had a much worse speech than PersonY had because _ stuttered during the speech.
Sentence 2: PersonX had a much better speech than PersonY had because _ stuttered during the speech.


Input: Context Word: speech.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX took PersonY's speech class; when she passed her final exam, _ celebrated with ice cream.
Sentence 2: PersonX taught PersonY's speech class; when she passed her final exam, _ celebrated with ice cream.


Input: Context Word: speech.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX was a showoff, PersonY was very shy which is why _ liked to be asked to give a speech.
Sentence 2: PersonX was a showoff, PersonY was very shy which is why _ did not like to be asked to give a speech.


Input: Context Word: speech.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX was extremely nervous to give a speech in front of PersonY at work, but _ tried not to be scared.
Sentence 2: PersonX was extremely nervous to give a speech in front of PersonY at work, because _ was a bit scary.


Input: Context Word: speech.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX was perfectly happy about giving a speech but PersonY was not because _ was very confident.
Sentence 2: PersonX was perfectly happy about giving a speech but PersonY was not because _ was very shy.


Input: Context Word: speech.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX was very outgoing and so wanted to make a public speech but PersonY dreaded it. This is because _ was an extrovert.
Sentence 2: PersonX was very outgoing and so wanted to make a public speech but PersonY dreaded it. This is because _ was an introvert.
.


Input: Context Word: speech.

Output:
Sentence 1: So _ was great at making speeches because PersonX enjoys talking a lot and PersonY is always quiet.
Sentence 2: So _ was terrible at making speeches because PersonX enjoys talking a lot and PersonY is always quiet.


Input: Context Word: speech.

Output:
Sentence 1: The boss decided that PersonX would give the speech instead of PersonY because they thought _ was more eloquent.
Sentence 2: The boss decided that PersonX would give the speech instead of PersonY because they thought _ was less eloquent.


Input: Context Word: speech.

Output:
Sentence 1: The speech that PersonX wrote was more succinct than PersonY's because _ is a writer.
Sentence 2: The speech that PersonX wrote was more shoddy than PersonY's because _ is a writer.


Input: Context Word: speech.

Output:
Sentence 1: When PersonX gave a speech, PersonY laughed and heckled. The teacher gave _ a prize.
Sentence 2: When PersonX gave a speech, PersonY laughed and heckled. The teacher gave _ a detention.


Input: Context Word: speech.

Output:
Sentence 1: While giving a speech in class, PersonX stays relaxed while PersonY is just the opposite. Therefore, _ has good nerves.
Sentence 2: While giving a speech in class, PersonX stays jittery while PersonY is just the opposite. Therefore, _ has good nerves.


Input: Context Word: diploma.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX invited PersonY to graduation because _ had worked hard and was getting a diploma.
Sentence 2: PersonX invited PersonY to graduation because _ had been slacking and was not getting a diploma.


Input: Context Word: friend.

Output:
Sentence 1: It was easy for PersonX to make a new friend but not for PersonY as _ was very sociable.
Sentence 2: It was easy for PersonX to make a new friend but not for PersonY as _ was very aloof.


Input: Context Word: friend.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX does not make a very good friend to PersonY because _ is a sociopath.
Sentence 2: PersonX does make a very good friend to PersonY because _ is a trustworthy pal.


Input: Context Word: friend.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX got in to fight and hurt his best friend PersonY but wants to keep him as a friend, because _ feels bad about hurting friend.
Sentence 2: PersonX got in to fight and hurt his best friend PersonY but wants to keep him as a friend, because _ feels hurt..


Input: Context Word: friend.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX has recently separated from his best friend PersonY and is trying to forget him, because _ misses him.
Sentence 2: PersonX has recently separated from his best friend PersonY and is trying to forget him, because _ hurt him.


Input: Context Word: friend.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX held and rocked PersonY as they sobbed because _ wanted to be a good friend.
Sentence 2: PersonX held and rocked PersonY as they sobbed because _ really needed a good friend.


Input: Context Word: friend.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX is starting to dislike PersonY's friend because _ is jealous of the new relationship.
Sentence 2: PersonX is starting to dislike PersonY's friend although _ is thrilled with the new relationship.


Input: Context Word: friend.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX makes a very good friend, as opposed to PersonY who does not because _ is trustworthy.
Sentence 2: PersonX makes a very good friend, as opposed to PersonY who does not because _ is selfish.


Input: Context Word: friend.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX picked up PersonY from the airport early in the morning, because _ was being a good friend.
Sentence 2: PersonX was picked up by PersonY from the airport early in the morning, because _ was being a good friend.


Input: Context Word: friend.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX sadly decided that they no longer wanted PersonY as a friend; _ had tired of them.
Sentence 2: PersonX sadly decided that they no longer wanted PersonY as a friend; _ had been too rude.


Input: Context Word: friend.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX wanted to learn how to make another friend but not PersonY because _ was lonely.
Sentence 2: PersonX wanted to learn how to make another friend but not PersonY because _ was social.


Input: Context Word: friend.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX's best friend PersonY has recently been abused a lot, so _ needs to help him.
Sentence 2: PersonX's best friend PersonY has recently been abused a lot, so _ asks for help.


Input: Context Word: friend.

Output:
Sentence 1: When PersonX met PersonY, they knew they would be great friends because _ loved to try new things.
Sentence 2: When PersonX met PersonY, they knew they would be great friends because _ hated to try new things.


Input: Context Word: concierge.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX is rated as the better concierge when compared to PersonY, so _ has probably done it for a greater number of years.
Sentence 2: PersonX is rated as the better concierge when compared to PersonY, so _ has probably done it for a fewer number of years.


Input: Context Word: showers.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX prefers to be clean every day unlike PersonY, so _ likes to take more showers.
Sentence 2: PersonX prefers to be clean every day unlike PersonY, so _ likes to take less showers.


Input: Context Word: caulking.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX didn't know how to handle a caulking gun so he let PersonY handle it since _ is inexperienced.
Sentence 2: PersonX didn't know how to handle a caulking gun so he let PersonY handle it since _ is experienced.


Input: Context Word: girl scouts.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX joined the Girl Scouts before PersonY, therefore _ has more experience selling yummy but overpriced cookies.
Sentence 2: PersonX joined the Girl Scouts before PersonY, therefore _ has less experience selling yummy but overpriced cookies.


Input: Context Word: sweets.

Output:
Sentence 1: Eating sweets was a big problem for PersonX but not for PersonY, thats why _ has a large waistline.
Sentence 2: Eating sweets was a big problem for PersonX but not for PersonY, thats why _ has a small waistline.


Input: Context Word: zippers.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX has boots with zippers and PersonY's boots don't have them, so _ unzipped their boots before taking them off.
Sentence 2: PersonX has boots with zippers and PersonY's boots don't have them, so _ took of their boots with no hands.


Input: Context Word: bought some hair dye.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX bought some hair dye and PersonY did not because _ liked change styles every month.
Sentence 2: PersonX bought some hair dye and PersonY did not because _ did not like to change styles every month.


Input: Context Word: downloaded.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX had a slower computer than PersonY because _ downloaded more movies and music online.
Sentence 2: PersonX had a faster computer than PersonY because _ downloaded more movies and music online.


Input: Context Word: reduce.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX but not PersonY wanted to reduce the amount of clutter in the office because _ was a neat freak.
Sentence 2: PersonX but not PersonY wanted to reduce the amount of clutter in the office because _ was not a neat freak.


Input: Context Word: reduce.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX had to reduce calories before summer but not PersonY because _ is a heavy person.
Sentence 2: PersonX had to reduce calories before summer but not PersonY because _ is a thin person.


Input: Context Word: reduce.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX made the choice to reduce PersonY's salary after _ started cutting back on expenses.
Sentence 2: PersonX made the choice to reduce PersonY's salary after _ started cutting back on efficiency.


Input: Context Word: reduce.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX took some ibuporfen from PersonY, hoping it would help reduce _ 's pain a bit.
Sentence 2: PersonX offered some ibuporfen to PersonY, hoping it would help reduce _ 's pain a bit.


Input: Context Word: reduce.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX tried to reduce PersonY 's contributions to the committee, but _ was too timid and she failed to stop her from speaking up.
Sentence 2: PersonX tried to reduce PersonY 's contributions to the committee, but _ was too persistent and she failed to stop her from speaking up.


Input: Context Word: reduce.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX tried to reduce the work hours for PersonY because _ did not need that much help.
Sentence 2: PersonX tried to reduce the work hours for PersonY because _ did not need that much income.


Input: Context Word: reduce.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX wanted to reduce stress in their life, so they left PersonY, because _ was always being berated by them.
Sentence 2: PersonX wanted to reduce stress in their life, so they left PersonY, because _ was always critiquing them.


Input: Context Word: reduce.

Output:
Sentence 1: To reduce global warming was central to PersonX's identity, and PersonY was curious about learning more about the subject, so _ extended an invitation to attend a local environmental conference.
Sentence 2: To reduce global warming was central to PersonX's identity, and PersonY was curious about learning more about the subject, so _ accepted an invitation to attend a local environmental conference.


Input: Context Word: Money.

Output:
Sentence 1: personx traveled mostly on persony money but _ later started to feel guilty about it.
Sentence 2: personx traveled mostly on persony money but _ later started to feel angry about it.


Input: Context Word: twist.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX needed to twist backward to talk with PersonY because _ was in front of her.
Sentence 2: PersonX needed to twist backward to talk with PersonY because _ was behind of her.


Input: Context Word: scab.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX puts a band aid on the scab of PersonY because _ is the adult in the situation.
Sentence 2: PersonX puts a band aid on the scab of PersonY because _ is the child in the situation.


Input: Context Word: pornography.

Output:
Sentence 1: The prudish PersonX did not like hanging out with the uninhibited PersonY , as _ hated watching pornography.
Sentence 2: The prudish PersonX did not like hanging out with the uninhibited PersonY , as _ loved watching pornography.


Input: Context Word: pornography.

Output:
Sentence 1: Watching pornography was considered a sin by PersonX but not by PersonY because _ was very religious.
Sentence 2: Watching pornography was considered a sin by PersonX but not by PersonY because _ was not very religious.


Input: Context Word: graduate degree.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX was able to get ahead in life compared to PersonY with a graduate degree so _ had good money.
Sentence 2: PersonX was able to get ahead in life compared to PersonY with a graduate degree so _ was very broke.


Input: Context Word: small farm.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX spent the day trying to lend a hand on PersonY's small farm, but wasn't much help. _ was inexperienced with farm work.
Sentence 2: PersonX spent the day trying to lend a hand on PersonY's small farm, but wasn't much help. _ was experienced with farm work.


Input: Context Word: Superstitious.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX is more superstitious than PersonY will ever be because _ is very unlucky in all things.
Sentence 2: PersonX is less superstitious than PersonY will ever be because _ is very unlucky in all things.


Input: Context Word: elected.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX was an running for elected office and PersonY was a voter, so _  asked them to vote for them.
Sentence 2: PersonX was an running for elected office and PersonY was a voter, so _  decided to vote for them.


Input: Context Word: overwhelming.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX found the heavy load at work overwhelming but not PersonY because _ did a poor job at planning their work.
Sentence 2: PersonX found the heavy load at work overwhelming but not PersonY because _ did a superb job at planning their work.


Input: Context Word: overwhelming.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX is mentally ill and faces many challenges, PersonY does not so therefore _ can find life overwhelming most of the time.
Sentence 2: PersonX is mentally ill and faces many challenges, PersonY does not so therefore _ can find life overwhelming occasionally.


Input: Context Word: complaints.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX asked PersonY if she had heard any complaints about the new teacher because _ had not heard any.
Sentence 2: PersonX asked PersonY if she had heard any complaints about the new teacher but _ had not heard any.


Input: Context Word: teacher.

Output:
Sentence 1: Being a teacher in elementary school suited PersonX but not PersonY because _ loved teaching children.
Sentence 2: Being a teacher in elementary school suited PersonX but not PersonY because _ hated teaching children.


Input: Context Word: teacher.

Output:
Sentence 1: In class PersonX talked back to PersonY the teacher when she asked her to do something, so _ got detention.
Sentence 2: In class PersonX talked back to PersonY the teacher when she asked her to do something, so _ gave detention.


Input: Context Word: teacher.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX hated his teacher in high school unlike PersonY, because _ was a horrible student.
Sentence 2: PersonX hated his teacher in high school unlike PersonY, because _ was a brilliant student.


Input: Context Word: teacher.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX is a more efficient teacher than PersonY because _ takes the time to teach the students.
Sentence 2: PersonX is a more efficient teacher than PersonY because _ has no patience or time to teach the students.


Input: Context Word: teacher.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX listened attentively to the teacher's careful instructions, while PersonY daydreamed, because _ was a good student.
Sentence 2: PersonX listened attentively to the teacher's careful instructions, while PersonY daydreamed, because _ was a poor student.


Input: Context Word: teacher.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX tried to ignore the fact that PersonY was crying, because _ was not a compassionate teacher.
Sentence 2: PersonX tried to address the fact that PersonY was crying, because _ was a very compassionate teacher.


Input: Context Word: teacher.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX wanted to impart knowledge and wisdom to PersonY, because _ was a dedicated teacher.
Sentence 2: PersonX wanted to gain knowledge and wisdom from PersonY, because _ was a dedicated teacher.


Input: Context Word: teacher.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX wanted to tell the teacher on PersonY for committing the crime, so _ was sad.
Sentence 2: PersonX  didn't want to tell the teacher on PersonY for committing the crime, so _ was happy.


Input: Context Word: teacher.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX was a better teacher than PersonY because _ had been doing the job for many more years.
Sentence 2: PersonX was a worse teacher than PersonY because _ had been doing the job for many more years.


Input: Context Word: teacher.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX was called teacher's pet by PersonY because _ always got the best test scores in the class.
Sentence 2: PersonX was called teacher's pet by PersonY even though   _ always got the best test scores in the class.


Input: Context Word: teacher.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX was in school to be a teacher, while PersonY was in school to be a programmer, because _ wanted to educate kids.
Sentence 2: PersonX was in school to be a teacher, while PersonY was in school to be a programmer, because _ wanted to write programs.


Input: Context Word: teacher.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX went to college to become a teacher but PersonY did not because _ was ambitious.
Sentence 2: PersonX went to college to become a teacher but PersonY did not because _ was lazy.


Input: Context Word: teacher.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX would make a poor kindergarten teacher, unlike PersonY, because _ was impatient with kids.
Sentence 2: PersonX would make a poor kindergarten teacher, unlike PersonY, because _ was patient with kids.


Input: Context Word: teacher.

Output:
Sentence 1: Reading books is not an everyday occurrence for PersonX unlike PersonY because _ is not a teacher.
Sentence 2: Reading books is not an everyday occurrence for PersonX unlike PersonY because _ works as a teacher.


Input: Context Word: teacher.

Output:
Sentence 1: Since PersonX was the math teacher of PersonY, _ graded their math problems over the weekend.
Sentence 2: Since PersonX was the math teacher of PersonY, _ had their math problems graded over the weekend.


Input: Context Word: teacher.

Output:
Sentence 1: The better teacher is PersonX when compared to PersonY because _ is much nicer to her students.
Sentence 2: The better teacher is PersonX when compared to PersonY because _ is much harsher to her students.


Input: Context Word: teacher.

Output:
Sentence 1: The teacher enjoyed having PersonX in their class but wished PersonY would be transferred because _ was obediant.
Sentence 2: The teacher enjoyed having PersonX in their class but wished PersonY would be transferred because _ was defiant.


Input: Context Word: teacher.

Output:
Sentence 1: The teacher told PersonX to stay after class but not PersonY because _ was being naughty.
Sentence 2: The teacher told PersonX to stay after class but not PersonY because _ was being polite.


Input: Context Word: teacher.

Output:
Sentence 1: Training to be a teacher came naturally to PersonX but PersonY struggled. _ had always loved kids.
Sentence 2: Training to be a teacher came naturally to PersonX but PersonY struggled. _ had always hated kids.


Input: Context Word: teacher.

Output:
Sentence 1: When the teacher saw PersonX teasing PersonY, the teacher sent _ to the principal's office.
Sentence 2: When the teacher saw PersonX teasing PersonY, the teacher sent _ to the counselor's office.


Input: Context Word: headache.

Output:
Sentence 1: On Tuesday, PersonX went to the hospital with PersonY because _ had a very painful headache.
Sentence 2: On Tuesday, PersonX went to the hospital with PersonY because _ did not have a very painful headache.


Input: Context Word: headache.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX's loud cheering and yelling was giving PersonY a pounding headache so _ finally stopped yelling.
Sentence 2: PersonX's loud cheering and yelling was giving PersonY a pounding headache so _ finally asked him to stop yelling.


Input: Context Word: headache.

Output:
Sentence 1: The headache affected PersonX more than it did PersonY because _ had a stronger one.
Sentence 2: The headache affected PersonX more than it did PersonY because _ had a weaker one.


Input: Context Word: headache.

Output:
Sentence 1: When PersonX had a headache, PersonY promptly offered some Asprin; then _ felt a lot better.
Sentence 2: When PersonX had a headache, PersonY promptly offered some Asprin; then _ felt quite proud.


Input: Context Word: allergies.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX doesn't understand why PersonY's allergies are so bad, but _ wonders if it is because of the flowers.
Sentence 2: PersonX doesn't understand why PersonY's allergies are so bad, but _ explains that it is because of the flowers.


Input: Context Word: allergies.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX had forgotten about PersonY's food allergies so _ accidentally put peanuts in the dessert.
Sentence 2: PersonX had forgotten about PersonY's food allergies so _ reminded her to not put peanuts in the dessert.


Input: Context Word: allergies.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX wants to go outside to play with PersonY, however his allergies are making it hard for _ to enjoy himself.
Sentence 2: PersonX wants to go outside to play with PersonY, however his allergies are making it hard so _ offers him some allergy medication.


Input: Context Word: allergies.

Output:
Sentence 1: The allergies of PersonX are far worse than those of PersonY, so _ has to take more medicine.
Sentence 2: The allergies of PersonX are far worse than those of PersonY, so _ has to take less medicine.


Input: Context Word: attracted.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX is really attracted to PersonY due to _ having very strange tastes in women.
Sentence 2: PersonX is really attracted to PersonY due to _ having very strange looks for a woman.


Input: Context Word: daily.

Output:
Sentence 1: Keeping to a daily routine was easier for PersonX than PersonY because _ had good self discipline.
Sentence 2: Keeping to a daily routine was easier for PersonX than PersonY because _ had very little self discipline.


Input: Context Word: daily.

Output:
Sentence 1: The daily activities of PersonX number fewer than the ones PersonY has to do, so _ is the less busy person.
Sentence 2: The daily activities of PersonX number fewer than the ones PersonY has to do, so _ is the busier person.


Input: Context Word: follow.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX refused to ever follow the rules set by PersonY, because _ was unfazed by the punishments.
Sentence 2: PersonX refused to ever follow the rules set by PersonY, so _ was ramping up the punishments.


Input: Context Word: slot machine.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX didn't want to let PersonY play with the slot machine seeing as how _ was on a hot streak.
Sentence 2: PersonX didn't want to let PersonY play with the slot machine even though _ was on a cold streak.


Input: Context Word: yarn.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX actually has a lot more yarn lying around the house than PersonY because _ is an avid knitter.
Sentence 2: PersonX actually has a lot more yarn lying around the house than PersonY because _ isn't an avid knitter.


Input: Context Word: yarn.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX bought a bunch of yarn for PersonY to knit with, so _ could get a sweater.
Sentence 2: PersonX bought a bunch of yarn for PersonY to knit with, so _ make get a sweater.


Input: Context Word: yarn.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX constantly left their yarn out when over at PersonYs house, so _ always had their yarn strewn about the house when returning.
Sentence 2: PersonX constantly left their yarn out when over at PersonYs house, so _ cats had the yarn strewn about the house when being visited.


Input: Context Word: yarn.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX needs help blocking the yarn so he asks his friend PersonY for help, because _ can't do it alone.
Sentence 2: PersonX needs help blocking the yarn so he asks his friend PersonY for help, so _ helps him.


Input: Context Word: yarn.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX told quite a yarn to PersonY, although _ didn't really know anything about the situation at all.
Sentence 2: PersonX told quite a yarn to PersonY, because _ didn't really know anything about the situation at all.


Input: Context Word: yarn.

Output:
Sentence 1: PersonX used the colorful yarn to make a scarf but not PersonY because _ was experienced with crochet needles.
Sentence 2: PersonX used the colorful yarn to make a scarf but not PersonY because _ was a novice with crochet needles.