Input:
Paragraph- Sent 1: The film starts with a shot of a spaceship flying through space .
Sent 2: El , a crew member , walks through the corridors of the ship when he discovers the eponymous magic portal , a rectangular arch flashing with various colors .
Sent 3: Entering the portal , he is transported into a world of passageways .
Sent 4: Some LEGO creatures appear and build a small car for him to drive through the world of passages .
Sent 5: He then has a close encounter with a two-headed monster who chases him through the various paths of the mysterious world .
Sent 6: After El 's car has a bump from a crossing train , the car falls apart .
Sent 7: El finds another portal , and nearly gets eaten by the monster , who ends up in the real world while chasing a leftover tyre from the devoured car and attacks Lindsay Fleay .
Sent 8: El reports his experiences to Captain Paranoia , but neither him nor his shipmate Pee believes him .
Sent 9: However , Captain Paranoia finds another Portal , which takes him to a `` white expanse '' world , where a plasticine creature messes around with him , making him very annoyed and then flushs him out of the white colored world .
Sent 10: The plasticine creature then goes back through the portal Captain Paranoia came through .
Sent 11: The Captain then finds his way back to the ship , and tells El and Pee about what happened in the Portal .
Sent 12: El , Pee , Captain Paranoia and the Plasticine creature , go through the Portal , and find themselves in the real world , and get chased by liquid paper daleks .
Sent 13: The four escape the liquid paper daleks , which are scared off by the two-headed monster that El had an encounter with earlier , in a shoe car .

Output: What is the name of the crew member who only goes through one Portal?


Input:
Paragraph- Sent 1: The film starts with a shot of a spaceship flying through space .
Sent 2: El , a crew member , walks through the corridors of the ship when he discovers the eponymous magic portal , a rectangular arch flashing with various colors .
Sent 3: Entering the portal , he is transported into a world of passageways .
Sent 4: Some LEGO creatures appear and build a small car for him to drive through the world of passages .
Sent 5: He then has a close encounter with a two-headed monster who chases him through the various paths of the mysterious world .
Sent 6: After El 's car has a bump from a crossing train , the car falls apart .
Sent 7: El finds another portal , and nearly gets eaten by the monster , who ends up in the real world while chasing a leftover tyre from the devoured car and attacks Lindsay Fleay .
Sent 8: El reports his experiences to Captain Paranoia , but neither him nor his shipmate Pee believes him .
Sent 9: However , Captain Paranoia finds another Portal , which takes him to a `` white expanse '' world , where a plasticine creature messes around with him , making him very annoyed and then flushs him out of the white colored world .
Sent 10: The plasticine creature then goes back through the portal Captain Paranoia came through .
Sent 11: The Captain then finds his way back to the ship , and tells El and Pee about what happened in the Portal .
Sent 12: El , Pee , Captain Paranoia and the Plasticine creature , go through the Portal , and find themselves in the real world , and get chased by liquid paper daleks .
Sent 13: The four escape the liquid paper daleks , which are scared off by the two-headed monster that El had an encounter with earlier , in a shoe car .

Output: How many portals did El discover?


Input:
Paragraph- Sent 1: The film starts with a shot of a spaceship flying through space .
Sent 2: El , a crew member , walks through the corridors of the ship when he discovers the eponymous magic portal , a rectangular arch flashing with various colors .
Sent 3: Entering the portal , he is transported into a world of passageways .
Sent 4: Some LEGO creatures appear and build a small car for him to drive through the world of passages .
Sent 5: He then has a close encounter with a two-headed monster who chases him through the various paths of the mysterious world .
Sent 6: After El 's car has a bump from a crossing train , the car falls apart .
Sent 7: El finds another portal , and nearly gets eaten by the monster , who ends up in the real world while chasing a leftover tyre from the devoured car and attacks Lindsay Fleay .
Sent 8: El reports his experiences to Captain Paranoia , but neither him nor his shipmate Pee believes him .
Sent 9: However , Captain Paranoia finds another Portal , which takes him to a `` white expanse '' world , where a plasticine creature messes around with him , making him very annoyed and then flushs him out of the white colored world .
Sent 10: The plasticine creature then goes back through the portal Captain Paranoia came through .
Sent 11: The Captain then finds his way back to the ship , and tells El and Pee about what happened in the Portal .
Sent 12: El , Pee , Captain Paranoia and the Plasticine creature , go through the Portal , and find themselves in the real world , and get chased by liquid paper daleks .
Sent 13: The four escape the liquid paper daleks , which are scared off by the two-headed monster that El had an encounter with earlier , in a shoe car .

Output: What did captain do when he was in  `` white expanse '' world ?


Input:
Paragraph- Sent 1: The film starts with a shot of a spaceship flying through space .
Sent 2: El , a crew member , walks through the corridors of the ship when he discovers the eponymous magic portal , a rectangular arch flashing with various colors .
Sent 3: Entering the portal , he is transported into a world of passageways .
Sent 4: Some LEGO creatures appear and build a small car for him to drive through the world of passages .
Sent 5: He then has a close encounter with a two-headed monster who chases him through the various paths of the mysterious world .
Sent 6: After El 's car has a bump from a crossing train , the car falls apart .
Sent 7: El finds another portal , and nearly gets eaten by the monster , who ends up in the real world while chasing a leftover tyre from the devoured car and attacks Lindsay Fleay .
Sent 8: El reports his experiences to Captain Paranoia , but neither him nor his shipmate Pee believes him .
Sent 9: However , Captain Paranoia finds another Portal , which takes him to a `` white expanse '' world , where a plasticine creature messes around with him , making him very annoyed and then flushs him out of the white colored world .
Sent 10: The plasticine creature then goes back through the portal Captain Paranoia came through .
Sent 11: The Captain then finds his way back to the ship , and tells El and Pee about what happened in the Portal .
Sent 12: El , Pee , Captain Paranoia and the Plasticine creature , go through the Portal , and find themselves in the real world , and get chased by liquid paper daleks .
Sent 13: The four escape the liquid paper daleks , which are scared off by the two-headed monster that El had an encounter with earlier , in a shoe car .

Output: What happens in the  world of passageways?


Input:
Paragraph- Sent 1: The film starts with a shot of a spaceship flying through space .
Sent 2: El , a crew member , walks through the corridors of the ship when he discovers the eponymous magic portal , a rectangular arch flashing with various colors .
Sent 3: Entering the portal , he is transported into a world of passageways .
Sent 4: Some LEGO creatures appear and build a small car for him to drive through the world of passages .
Sent 5: He then has a close encounter with a two-headed monster who chases him through the various paths of the mysterious world .
Sent 6: After El 's car has a bump from a crossing train , the car falls apart .
Sent 7: El finds another portal , and nearly gets eaten by the monster , who ends up in the real world while chasing a leftover tyre from the devoured car and attacks Lindsay Fleay .
Sent 8: El reports his experiences to Captain Paranoia , but neither him nor his shipmate Pee believes him .
Sent 9: However , Captain Paranoia finds another Portal , which takes him to a `` white expanse '' world , where a plasticine creature messes around with him , making him very annoyed and then flushs him out of the white colored world .
Sent 10: The plasticine creature then goes back through the portal Captain Paranoia came through .
Sent 11: The Captain then finds his way back to the ship , and tells El and Pee about what happened in the Portal .
Sent 12: El , Pee , Captain Paranoia and the Plasticine creature , go through the Portal , and find themselves in the real world , and get chased by liquid paper daleks .
Sent 13: The four escape the liquid paper daleks , which are scared off by the two-headed monster that El had an encounter with earlier , in a shoe car .

Output: What happens to the car that the Lego creatures build?


Input:
Paragraph- Sent 1: At age 16, Alexander's education under Aristotle ended.
Sent 2: Philip waged war against Byzantion, leaving Alexander in charge as regent and heir apparent.
Sent 3: During Philip's absence, the Thracian Maedi revolted against Macedonia.
Sent 4: Alexander responded quickly, driving them from their territory.
Sent 5: He colonized it with Greeks, and founded a city named Alexandropolis.
Sent 6: Upon Philip's return, he dispatched Alexander with a small force to subdue revolts in southern Thrace.
Sent 7: Campaigning against the Greek city of Perinthus, Alexander is reported to have saved his father's life.
Sent 8: Meanwhile, the city of Amphissa began to work lands that were sacred to Apollo near Delphi, a sacrilege that gave Philip the opportunity to further intervene in Greek affairs.
Sent 9: Still occupied in Thrace, he ordered Alexander to muster an army for a campaign in Greece.
Sent 10: Concerned that other Greek states might intervene, Alexander made it look as though he was preparing to attack Illyria instead.
Sent 11: During this turmoil, the Illyrians invaded Macedonia, only to be repelled by Alexander.
Sent 12: Philip and his army joined his son in 338 BC, and they marched south through Thermopylae, taking it after stubborn resistance from its Theban garrison.
Sent 13: They went on to occupy the city of Elatea, only a few days' march from both Athens and Thebes.
Sent 14: The Athenians, led by Demosthenes, voted to seek alliance with Thebes against Macedonia.
Sent 15: Both Athens and Philip sent embassies to win Thebes' favor, but Athens won the contest.
Sent 16: Philip marched on Amphissa (ostensibly acting on the request of the Amphictyonic League), capturing the mercenaries sent there by Demosthenes and accepting the city's surrender.
Sent 17: Philip then returned to Elatea, sending a final offer of peace to Athens and Thebes, who both rejected it.

Output: Why was Philip absent when the Thracian Maedi revolted against Macedonia?


Input:
Paragraph- Sent 1: At age 16, Alexander's education under Aristotle ended.
Sent 2: Philip waged war against Byzantion, leaving Alexander in charge as regent and heir apparent.
Sent 3: During Philip's absence, the Thracian Maedi revolted against Macedonia.
Sent 4: Alexander responded quickly, driving them from their territory.
Sent 5: He colonized it with Greeks, and founded a city named Alexandropolis.
Sent 6: Upon Philip's return, he dispatched Alexander with a small force to subdue revolts in southern Thrace.
Sent 7: Campaigning against the Greek city of Perinthus, Alexander is reported to have saved his father's life.
Sent 8: Meanwhile, the city of Amphissa began to work lands that were sacred to Apollo near Delphi, a sacrilege that gave Philip the opportunity to further intervene in Greek affairs.
Sent 9: Still occupied in Thrace, he ordered Alexander to muster an army for a campaign in Greece.
Sent 10: Concerned that other Greek states might intervene, Alexander made it look as though he was preparing to attack Illyria instead.
Sent 11: During this turmoil, the Illyrians invaded Macedonia, only to be repelled by Alexander.
Sent 12: Philip and his army joined his son in 338 BC, and they marched south through Thermopylae, taking it after stubborn resistance from its Theban garrison.
Sent 13: They went on to occupy the city of Elatea, only a few days' march from both Athens and Thebes.
Sent 14: The Athenians, led by Demosthenes, voted to seek alliance with Thebes against Macedonia.
Sent 15: Both Athens and Philip sent embassies to win Thebes' favor, but Athens won the contest.
Sent 16: Philip marched on Amphissa (ostensibly acting on the request of the Amphictyonic League), capturing the mercenaries sent there by Demosthenes and accepting the city's surrender.
Sent 17: Philip then returned to Elatea, sending a final offer of peace to Athens and Thebes, who both rejected it.

Output: How many times, in total, did Phillip try to reach out to Athens during all of this?


Input:
Paragraph- Sent 1: At age 16, Alexander's education under Aristotle ended.
Sent 2: Philip waged war against Byzantion, leaving Alexander in charge as regent and heir apparent.
Sent 3: During Philip's absence, the Thracian Maedi revolted against Macedonia.
Sent 4: Alexander responded quickly, driving them from their territory.
Sent 5: He colonized it with Greeks, and founded a city named Alexandropolis.
Sent 6: Upon Philip's return, he dispatched Alexander with a small force to subdue revolts in southern Thrace.
Sent 7: Campaigning against the Greek city of Perinthus, Alexander is reported to have saved his father's life.
Sent 8: Meanwhile, the city of Amphissa began to work lands that were sacred to Apollo near Delphi, a sacrilege that gave Philip the opportunity to further intervene in Greek affairs.
Sent 9: Still occupied in Thrace, he ordered Alexander to muster an army for a campaign in Greece.
Sent 10: Concerned that other Greek states might intervene, Alexander made it look as though he was preparing to attack Illyria instead.
Sent 11: During this turmoil, the Illyrians invaded Macedonia, only to be repelled by Alexander.
Sent 12: Philip and his army joined his son in 338 BC, and they marched south through Thermopylae, taking it after stubborn resistance from its Theban garrison.
Sent 13: They went on to occupy the city of Elatea, only a few days' march from both Athens and Thebes.
Sent 14: The Athenians, led by Demosthenes, voted to seek alliance with Thebes against Macedonia.
Sent 15: Both Athens and Philip sent embassies to win Thebes' favor, but Athens won the contest.
Sent 16: Philip marched on Amphissa (ostensibly acting on the request of the Amphictyonic League), capturing the mercenaries sent there by Demosthenes and accepting the city's surrender.
Sent 17: Philip then returned to Elatea, sending a final offer of peace to Athens and Thebes, who both rejected it.

Output: What happened while Phillip was away fighting Byzantion?


Input:
Paragraph- Sent 1: At age 16, Alexander's education under Aristotle ended.
Sent 2: Philip waged war against Byzantion, leaving Alexander in charge as regent and heir apparent.
Sent 3: During Philip's absence, the Thracian Maedi revolted against Macedonia.
Sent 4: Alexander responded quickly, driving them from their territory.
Sent 5: He colonized it with Greeks, and founded a city named Alexandropolis.
Sent 6: Upon Philip's return, he dispatched Alexander with a small force to subdue revolts in southern Thrace.
Sent 7: Campaigning against the Greek city of Perinthus, Alexander is reported to have saved his father's life.
Sent 8: Meanwhile, the city of Amphissa began to work lands that were sacred to Apollo near Delphi, a sacrilege that gave Philip the opportunity to further intervene in Greek affairs.
Sent 9: Still occupied in Thrace, he ordered Alexander to muster an army for a campaign in Greece.
Sent 10: Concerned that other Greek states might intervene, Alexander made it look as though he was preparing to attack Illyria instead.
Sent 11: During this turmoil, the Illyrians invaded Macedonia, only to be repelled by Alexander.
Sent 12: Philip and his army joined his son in 338 BC, and they marched south through Thermopylae, taking it after stubborn resistance from its Theban garrison.
Sent 13: They went on to occupy the city of Elatea, only a few days' march from both Athens and Thebes.
Sent 14: The Athenians, led by Demosthenes, voted to seek alliance with Thebes against Macedonia.
Sent 15: Both Athens and Philip sent embassies to win Thebes' favor, but Athens won the contest.
Sent 16: Philip marched on Amphissa (ostensibly acting on the request of the Amphictyonic League), capturing the mercenaries sent there by Demosthenes and accepting the city's surrender.
Sent 17: Philip then returned to Elatea, sending a final offer of peace to Athens and Thebes, who both rejected it.

Output: What did Alexander do to evade the Greek states?


Input:
Paragraph- Sent 1: At age 16, Alexander's education under Aristotle ended.
Sent 2: Philip waged war against Byzantion, leaving Alexander in charge as regent and heir apparent.
Sent 3: During Philip's absence, the Thracian Maedi revolted against Macedonia.
Sent 4: Alexander responded quickly, driving them from their territory.
Sent 5: He colonized it with Greeks, and founded a city named Alexandropolis.
Sent 6: Upon Philip's return, he dispatched Alexander with a small force to subdue revolts in southern Thrace.
Sent 7: Campaigning against the Greek city of Perinthus, Alexander is reported to have saved his father's life.
Sent 8: Meanwhile, the city of Amphissa began to work lands that were sacred to Apollo near Delphi, a sacrilege that gave Philip the opportunity to further intervene in Greek affairs.
Sent 9: Still occupied in Thrace, he ordered Alexander to muster an army for a campaign in Greece.
Sent 10: Concerned that other Greek states might intervene, Alexander made it look as though he was preparing to attack Illyria instead.
Sent 11: During this turmoil, the Illyrians invaded Macedonia, only to be repelled by Alexander.
Sent 12: Philip and his army joined his son in 338 BC, and they marched south through Thermopylae, taking it after stubborn resistance from its Theban garrison.
Sent 13: They went on to occupy the city of Elatea, only a few days' march from both Athens and Thebes.
Sent 14: The Athenians, led by Demosthenes, voted to seek alliance with Thebes against Macedonia.
Sent 15: Both Athens and Philip sent embassies to win Thebes' favor, but Athens won the contest.
Sent 16: Philip marched on Amphissa (ostensibly acting on the request of the Amphictyonic League), capturing the mercenaries sent there by Demosthenes and accepting the city's surrender.
Sent 17: Philip then returned to Elatea, sending a final offer of peace to Athens and Thebes, who both rejected it.

Output: Why did Alexander drive Thracian Maedi from their territory?


Input:
Paragraph- Sent 1: At age 16, Alexander's education under Aristotle ended.
Sent 2: Philip waged war against Byzantion, leaving Alexander in charge as regent and heir apparent.
Sent 3: During Philip's absence, the Thracian Maedi revolted against Macedonia.
Sent 4: Alexander responded quickly, driving them from their territory.
Sent 5: He colonized it with Greeks, and founded a city named Alexandropolis.
Sent 6: Upon Philip's return, he dispatched Alexander with a small force to subdue revolts in southern Thrace.
Sent 7: Campaigning against the Greek city of Perinthus, Alexander is reported to have saved his father's life.
Sent 8: Meanwhile, the city of Amphissa began to work lands that were sacred to Apollo near Delphi, a sacrilege that gave Philip the opportunity to further intervene in Greek affairs.
Sent 9: Still occupied in Thrace, he ordered Alexander to muster an army for a campaign in Greece.
Sent 10: Concerned that other Greek states might intervene, Alexander made it look as though he was preparing to attack Illyria instead.
Sent 11: During this turmoil, the Illyrians invaded Macedonia, only to be repelled by Alexander.
Sent 12: Philip and his army joined his son in 338 BC, and they marched south through Thermopylae, taking it after stubborn resistance from its Theban garrison.
Sent 13: They went on to occupy the city of Elatea, only a few days' march from both Athens and Thebes.
Sent 14: The Athenians, led by Demosthenes, voted to seek alliance with Thebes against Macedonia.
Sent 15: Both Athens and Philip sent embassies to win Thebes' favor, but Athens won the contest.
Sent 16: Philip marched on Amphissa (ostensibly acting on the request of the Amphictyonic League), capturing the mercenaries sent there by Demosthenes and accepting the city's surrender.
Sent 17: Philip then returned to Elatea, sending a final offer of peace to Athens and Thebes, who both rejected it.

Output: Which state won an alliance with Macedonia?


Input:
Paragraph- Sent 1: At age 16, Alexander's education under Aristotle ended.
Sent 2: Philip waged war against Byzantion, leaving Alexander in charge as regent and heir apparent.
Sent 3: During Philip's absence, the Thracian Maedi revolted against Macedonia.
Sent 4: Alexander responded quickly, driving them from their territory.
Sent 5: He colonized it with Greeks, and founded a city named Alexandropolis.
Sent 6: Upon Philip's return, he dispatched Alexander with a small force to subdue revolts in southern Thrace.
Sent 7: Campaigning against the Greek city of Perinthus, Alexander is reported to have saved his father's life.
Sent 8: Meanwhile, the city of Amphissa began to work lands that were sacred to Apollo near Delphi, a sacrilege that gave Philip the opportunity to further intervene in Greek affairs.
Sent 9: Still occupied in Thrace, he ordered Alexander to muster an army for a campaign in Greece.
Sent 10: Concerned that other Greek states might intervene, Alexander made it look as though he was preparing to attack Illyria instead.
Sent 11: During this turmoil, the Illyrians invaded Macedonia, only to be repelled by Alexander.
Sent 12: Philip and his army joined his son in 338 BC, and they marched south through Thermopylae, taking it after stubborn resistance from its Theban garrison.
Sent 13: They went on to occupy the city of Elatea, only a few days' march from both Athens and Thebes.
Sent 14: The Athenians, led by Demosthenes, voted to seek alliance with Thebes against Macedonia.
Sent 15: Both Athens and Philip sent embassies to win Thebes' favor, but Athens won the contest.
Sent 16: Philip marched on Amphissa (ostensibly acting on the request of the Amphictyonic League), capturing the mercenaries sent there by Demosthenes and accepting the city's surrender.
Sent 17: Philip then returned to Elatea, sending a final offer of peace to Athens and Thebes, who both rejected it.

Output: In 338 B.C. what two places did Phillip and his son occupy or overtake?


Input:
Paragraph- Sent 1: At age 16, Alexander's education under Aristotle ended.
Sent 2: Philip waged war against Byzantion, leaving Alexander in charge as regent and heir apparent.
Sent 3: During Philip's absence, the Thracian Maedi revolted against Macedonia.
Sent 4: Alexander responded quickly, driving them from their territory.
Sent 5: He colonized it with Greeks, and founded a city named Alexandropolis.
Sent 6: Upon Philip's return, he dispatched Alexander with a small force to subdue revolts in southern Thrace.
Sent 7: Campaigning against the Greek city of Perinthus, Alexander is reported to have saved his father's life.
Sent 8: Meanwhile, the city of Amphissa began to work lands that were sacred to Apollo near Delphi, a sacrilege that gave Philip the opportunity to further intervene in Greek affairs.
Sent 9: Still occupied in Thrace, he ordered Alexander to muster an army for a campaign in Greece.
Sent 10: Concerned that other Greek states might intervene, Alexander made it look as though he was preparing to attack Illyria instead.
Sent 11: During this turmoil, the Illyrians invaded Macedonia, only to be repelled by Alexander.
Sent 12: Philip and his army joined his son in 338 BC, and they marched south through Thermopylae, taking it after stubborn resistance from its Theban garrison.
Sent 13: They went on to occupy the city of Elatea, only a few days' march from both Athens and Thebes.
Sent 14: The Athenians, led by Demosthenes, voted to seek alliance with Thebes against Macedonia.
Sent 15: Both Athens and Philip sent embassies to win Thebes' favor, but Athens won the contest.
Sent 16: Philip marched on Amphissa (ostensibly acting on the request of the Amphictyonic League), capturing the mercenaries sent there by Demosthenes and accepting the city's surrender.
Sent 17: Philip then returned to Elatea, sending a final offer of peace to Athens and Thebes, who both rejected it.

Output: Who founded Alexandropolis?


Input:
Paragraph- Sent 1: At age 16, Alexander's education under Aristotle ended.
Sent 2: Philip waged war against Byzantion, leaving Alexander in charge as regent and heir apparent.
Sent 3: During Philip's absence, the Thracian Maedi revolted against Macedonia.
Sent 4: Alexander responded quickly, driving them from their territory.
Sent 5: He colonized it with Greeks, and founded a city named Alexandropolis.
Sent 6: Upon Philip's return, he dispatched Alexander with a small force to subdue revolts in southern Thrace.
Sent 7: Campaigning against the Greek city of Perinthus, Alexander is reported to have saved his father's life.
Sent 8: Meanwhile, the city of Amphissa began to work lands that were sacred to Apollo near Delphi, a sacrilege that gave Philip the opportunity to further intervene in Greek affairs.
Sent 9: Still occupied in Thrace, he ordered Alexander to muster an army for a campaign in Greece.
Sent 10: Concerned that other Greek states might intervene, Alexander made it look as though he was preparing to attack Illyria instead.
Sent 11: During this turmoil, the Illyrians invaded Macedonia, only to be repelled by Alexander.
Sent 12: Philip and his army joined his son in 338 BC, and they marched south through Thermopylae, taking it after stubborn resistance from its Theban garrison.
Sent 13: They went on to occupy the city of Elatea, only a few days' march from both Athens and Thebes.
Sent 14: The Athenians, led by Demosthenes, voted to seek alliance with Thebes against Macedonia.
Sent 15: Both Athens and Philip sent embassies to win Thebes' favor, but Athens won the contest.
Sent 16: Philip marched on Amphissa (ostensibly acting on the request of the Amphictyonic League), capturing the mercenaries sent there by Demosthenes and accepting the city's surrender.
Sent 17: Philip then returned to Elatea, sending a final offer of peace to Athens and Thebes, who both rejected it.

Output: At what age did Alexander's education end and he fulfilled the role of regent and heir apparent?


Input:
Paragraph- Sent 1: At age 16, Alexander's education under Aristotle ended.
Sent 2: Philip waged war against Byzantion, leaving Alexander in charge as regent and heir apparent.
Sent 3: During Philip's absence, the Thracian Maedi revolted against Macedonia.
Sent 4: Alexander responded quickly, driving them from their territory.
Sent 5: He colonized it with Greeks, and founded a city named Alexandropolis.
Sent 6: Upon Philip's return, he dispatched Alexander with a small force to subdue revolts in southern Thrace.
Sent 7: Campaigning against the Greek city of Perinthus, Alexander is reported to have saved his father's life.
Sent 8: Meanwhile, the city of Amphissa began to work lands that were sacred to Apollo near Delphi, a sacrilege that gave Philip the opportunity to further intervene in Greek affairs.
Sent 9: Still occupied in Thrace, he ordered Alexander to muster an army for a campaign in Greece.
Sent 10: Concerned that other Greek states might intervene, Alexander made it look as though he was preparing to attack Illyria instead.
Sent 11: During this turmoil, the Illyrians invaded Macedonia, only to be repelled by Alexander.
Sent 12: Philip and his army joined his son in 338 BC, and they marched south through Thermopylae, taking it after stubborn resistance from its Theban garrison.
Sent 13: They went on to occupy the city of Elatea, only a few days' march from both Athens and Thebes.
Sent 14: The Athenians, led by Demosthenes, voted to seek alliance with Thebes against Macedonia.
Sent 15: Both Athens and Philip sent embassies to win Thebes' favor, but Athens won the contest.
Sent 16: Philip marched on Amphissa (ostensibly acting on the request of the Amphictyonic League), capturing the mercenaries sent there by Demosthenes and accepting the city's surrender.
Sent 17: Philip then returned to Elatea, sending a final offer of peace to Athens and Thebes, who both rejected it.

Output: Why was Alexander the one to respond when Thracian Maedi revolted against Macedonia?


Input:
Paragraph- Sent 1: At age 16, Alexander's education under Aristotle ended.
Sent 2: Philip waged war against Byzantion, leaving Alexander in charge as regent and heir apparent.
Sent 3: During Philip's absence, the Thracian Maedi revolted against Macedonia.
Sent 4: Alexander responded quickly, driving them from their territory.
Sent 5: He colonized it with Greeks, and founded a city named Alexandropolis.
Sent 6: Upon Philip's return, he dispatched Alexander with a small force to subdue revolts in southern Thrace.
Sent 7: Campaigning against the Greek city of Perinthus, Alexander is reported to have saved his father's life.
Sent 8: Meanwhile, the city of Amphissa began to work lands that were sacred to Apollo near Delphi, a sacrilege that gave Philip the opportunity to further intervene in Greek affairs.
Sent 9: Still occupied in Thrace, he ordered Alexander to muster an army for a campaign in Greece.
Sent 10: Concerned that other Greek states might intervene, Alexander made it look as though he was preparing to attack Illyria instead.
Sent 11: During this turmoil, the Illyrians invaded Macedonia, only to be repelled by Alexander.
Sent 12: Philip and his army joined his son in 338 BC, and they marched south through Thermopylae, taking it after stubborn resistance from its Theban garrison.
Sent 13: They went on to occupy the city of Elatea, only a few days' march from both Athens and Thebes.
Sent 14: The Athenians, led by Demosthenes, voted to seek alliance with Thebes against Macedonia.
Sent 15: Both Athens and Philip sent embassies to win Thebes' favor, but Athens won the contest.
Sent 16: Philip marched on Amphissa (ostensibly acting on the request of the Amphictyonic League), capturing the mercenaries sent there by Demosthenes and accepting the city's surrender.
Sent 17: Philip then returned to Elatea, sending a final offer of peace to Athens and Thebes, who both rejected it.

Output: When did Philip return to Elatea?


Input:
Paragraph- Sent 1: At age 16, Alexander's education under Aristotle ended.
Sent 2: Philip waged war against Byzantion, leaving Alexander in charge as regent and heir apparent.
Sent 3: During Philip's absence, the Thracian Maedi revolted against Macedonia.
Sent 4: Alexander responded quickly, driving them from their territory.
Sent 5: He colonized it with Greeks, and founded a city named Alexandropolis.
Sent 6: Upon Philip's return, he dispatched Alexander with a small force to subdue revolts in southern Thrace.
Sent 7: Campaigning against the Greek city of Perinthus, Alexander is reported to have saved his father's life.
Sent 8: Meanwhile, the city of Amphissa began to work lands that were sacred to Apollo near Delphi, a sacrilege that gave Philip the opportunity to further intervene in Greek affairs.
Sent 9: Still occupied in Thrace, he ordered Alexander to muster an army for a campaign in Greece.
Sent 10: Concerned that other Greek states might intervene, Alexander made it look as though he was preparing to attack Illyria instead.
Sent 11: During this turmoil, the Illyrians invaded Macedonia, only to be repelled by Alexander.
Sent 12: Philip and his army joined his son in 338 BC, and they marched south through Thermopylae, taking it after stubborn resistance from its Theban garrison.
Sent 13: They went on to occupy the city of Elatea, only a few days' march from both Athens and Thebes.
Sent 14: The Athenians, led by Demosthenes, voted to seek alliance with Thebes against Macedonia.
Sent 15: Both Athens and Philip sent embassies to win Thebes' favor, but Athens won the contest.
Sent 16: Philip marched on Amphissa (ostensibly acting on the request of the Amphictyonic League), capturing the mercenaries sent there by Demosthenes and accepting the city's surrender.
Sent 17: Philip then returned to Elatea, sending a final offer of peace to Athens and Thebes, who both rejected it.

Output: Who is Alexander's father?


Input:
Paragraph- Sent 1: On either 10 or 11 June 323 BC, Alexander died in the palace of Nebuchadnezzar II, in Babylon, at age 32.
Sent 2: There are two different versions of Alexander's death and details of the death differ slightly in each.
Sent 3: Plutarch's account is that roughly 14 days before his death, Alexander entertained admiral Nearchus, and spent the night and next day drinking with Medius of Larissa.
Sent 4: He developed a fever, which worsened until he was unable to speak.
Sent 5: The common soldiers, anxious about his health, were granted the right to file past him as he silently waved at them.
Sent 6: In the second account, Diodorus recounts that Alexander was struck with pain after downing a large bowl of unmixed wine in honour of Heracles, followed by 11 days of weakness; he did not develop a fever and died after some agony.
Sent 7: Arrian also mentioned this as an alternative, but Plutarch specifically denied this claim.
Sent 8: Given the propensity of the Macedonian aristocracy to assassination, foul play featured in multiple accounts of his death.
Sent 9: Diodorus, Plutarch, Arrian and Justin all mentioned the theory that Alexander was poisoned.
Sent 10: Justin stated that Alexander was the victim of a poisoning conspiracy, Plutarch dismissed it as a fabrication, while both Diodorus and Arrian noted that they mentioned it only for the sake of completeness.
Sent 11: The accounts were nevertheless fairly consistent in designating Antipater, recently removed as Macedonian viceroy, and at odds with Olympias, as the head of the alleged plot.
Sent 12: Perhaps taking his summons to Babylon as a death sentence, and having seen the fate of Parmenion and Philotas, Antipater purportedly arranged for Alexander to be poisoned by his son Iollas, who was Alexander's wine-pourer.
Sent 13: There was even a suggestion that Aristotle may have participated.
Sent 14: It is claimed that the strongest argument against the poison theory is the fact that twelve days passed between the start of his illness and his death; such long-acting poisons were probably not available.
Sent 15: However, in 2003 Dr Leo Schep From The New Zealand National Poisons Centre proposed in a BBC documentary investigating his death that the plant white hellebore (Veratrum album) may have been used to poison Alexander.
Sent 16: In 2014 Dr Leo Schep published this theory in the peer-reviewed medical journal Clinical Toxicology; in this journal article it was suggested Alexander's wine was spiked with Veratrum album, a plant known to the Ancient Greeks, which produces poisoning symptoms that match the course of events as described in the Alexander Romance.
Sent 17: Veratrum album poisoning can have a prolonged course and it was suggested that if Alexander was poisoned, Veratrum album offers the most plausible cause.
Sent 18: Another poisoning explanation was put forward in 2010, it was proposed that the circumstances of his death were compatible with poisoning by water of the river Styx (Mavroneri) that contained calicheamicin, a dangerous compound produced by bacteria.

Output: Who was behind the plot to kill Alexander?


Input:
Paragraph- Sent 1: On either 10 or 11 June 323 BC, Alexander died in the palace of Nebuchadnezzar II, in Babylon, at age 32.
Sent 2: There are two different versions of Alexander's death and details of the death differ slightly in each.
Sent 3: Plutarch's account is that roughly 14 days before his death, Alexander entertained admiral Nearchus, and spent the night and next day drinking with Medius of Larissa.
Sent 4: He developed a fever, which worsened until he was unable to speak.
Sent 5: The common soldiers, anxious about his health, were granted the right to file past him as he silently waved at them.
Sent 6: In the second account, Diodorus recounts that Alexander was struck with pain after downing a large bowl of unmixed wine in honour of Heracles, followed by 11 days of weakness; he did not develop a fever and died after some agony.
Sent 7: Arrian also mentioned this as an alternative, but Plutarch specifically denied this claim.
Sent 8: Given the propensity of the Macedonian aristocracy to assassination, foul play featured in multiple accounts of his death.
Sent 9: Diodorus, Plutarch, Arrian and Justin all mentioned the theory that Alexander was poisoned.
Sent 10: Justin stated that Alexander was the victim of a poisoning conspiracy, Plutarch dismissed it as a fabrication, while both Diodorus and Arrian noted that they mentioned it only for the sake of completeness.
Sent 11: The accounts were nevertheless fairly consistent in designating Antipater, recently removed as Macedonian viceroy, and at odds with Olympias, as the head of the alleged plot.
Sent 12: Perhaps taking his summons to Babylon as a death sentence, and having seen the fate of Parmenion and Philotas, Antipater purportedly arranged for Alexander to be poisoned by his son Iollas, who was Alexander's wine-pourer.
Sent 13: There was even a suggestion that Aristotle may have participated.
Sent 14: It is claimed that the strongest argument against the poison theory is the fact that twelve days passed between the start of his illness and his death; such long-acting poisons were probably not available.
Sent 15: However, in 2003 Dr Leo Schep From The New Zealand National Poisons Centre proposed in a BBC documentary investigating his death that the plant white hellebore (Veratrum album) may have been used to poison Alexander.
Sent 16: In 2014 Dr Leo Schep published this theory in the peer-reviewed medical journal Clinical Toxicology; in this journal article it was suggested Alexander's wine was spiked with Veratrum album, a plant known to the Ancient Greeks, which produces poisoning symptoms that match the course of events as described in the Alexander Romance.
Sent 17: Veratrum album poisoning can have a prolonged course and it was suggested that if Alexander was poisoned, Veratrum album offers the most plausible cause.
Sent 18: Another poisoning explanation was put forward in 2010, it was proposed that the circumstances of his death were compatible with poisoning by water of the river Styx (Mavroneri) that contained calicheamicin, a dangerous compound produced by bacteria.

Output: According to Plutarch, did Alexander's symptoms include fever?


Input:
Paragraph- Sent 1: On either 10 or 11 June 323 BC, Alexander died in the palace of Nebuchadnezzar II, in Babylon, at age 32.
Sent 2: There are two different versions of Alexander's death and details of the death differ slightly in each.
Sent 3: Plutarch's account is that roughly 14 days before his death, Alexander entertained admiral Nearchus, and spent the night and next day drinking with Medius of Larissa.
Sent 4: He developed a fever, which worsened until he was unable to speak.
Sent 5: The common soldiers, anxious about his health, were granted the right to file past him as he silently waved at them.
Sent 6: In the second account, Diodorus recounts that Alexander was struck with pain after downing a large bowl of unmixed wine in honour of Heracles, followed by 11 days of weakness; he did not develop a fever and died after some agony.
Sent 7: Arrian also mentioned this as an alternative, but Plutarch specifically denied this claim.
Sent 8: Given the propensity of the Macedonian aristocracy to assassination, foul play featured in multiple accounts of his death.
Sent 9: Diodorus, Plutarch, Arrian and Justin all mentioned the theory that Alexander was poisoned.
Sent 10: Justin stated that Alexander was the victim of a poisoning conspiracy, Plutarch dismissed it as a fabrication, while both Diodorus and Arrian noted that they mentioned it only for the sake of completeness.
Sent 11: The accounts were nevertheless fairly consistent in designating Antipater, recently removed as Macedonian viceroy, and at odds with Olympias, as the head of the alleged plot.
Sent 12: Perhaps taking his summons to Babylon as a death sentence, and having seen the fate of Parmenion and Philotas, Antipater purportedly arranged for Alexander to be poisoned by his son Iollas, who was Alexander's wine-pourer.
Sent 13: There was even a suggestion that Aristotle may have participated.
Sent 14: It is claimed that the strongest argument against the poison theory is the fact that twelve days passed between the start of his illness and his death; such long-acting poisons were probably not available.
Sent 15: However, in 2003 Dr Leo Schep From The New Zealand National Poisons Centre proposed in a BBC documentary investigating his death that the plant white hellebore (Veratrum album) may have been used to poison Alexander.
Sent 16: In 2014 Dr Leo Schep published this theory in the peer-reviewed medical journal Clinical Toxicology; in this journal article it was suggested Alexander's wine was spiked with Veratrum album, a plant known to the Ancient Greeks, which produces poisoning symptoms that match the course of events as described in the Alexander Romance.
Sent 17: Veratrum album poisoning can have a prolonged course and it was suggested that if Alexander was poisoned, Veratrum album offers the most plausible cause.
Sent 18: Another poisoning explanation was put forward in 2010, it was proposed that the circumstances of his death were compatible with poisoning by water of the river Styx (Mavroneri) that contained calicheamicin, a dangerous compound produced by bacteria.

Output: Approximately when was Alexander the Great supposedly poisoned.?


Input:
Paragraph- Sent 1: On either 10 or 11 June 323 BC, Alexander died in the palace of Nebuchadnezzar II, in Babylon, at age 32.
Sent 2: There are two different versions of Alexander's death and details of the death differ slightly in each.
Sent 3: Plutarch's account is that roughly 14 days before his death, Alexander entertained admiral Nearchus, and spent the night and next day drinking with Medius of Larissa.
Sent 4: He developed a fever, which worsened until he was unable to speak.
Sent 5: The common soldiers, anxious about his health, were granted the right to file past him as he silently waved at them.
Sent 6: In the second account, Diodorus recounts that Alexander was struck with pain after downing a large bowl of unmixed wine in honour of Heracles, followed by 11 days of weakness; he did not develop a fever and died after some agony.
Sent 7: Arrian also mentioned this as an alternative, but Plutarch specifically denied this claim.
Sent 8: Given the propensity of the Macedonian aristocracy to assassination, foul play featured in multiple accounts of his death.
Sent 9: Diodorus, Plutarch, Arrian and Justin all mentioned the theory that Alexander was poisoned.
Sent 10: Justin stated that Alexander was the victim of a poisoning conspiracy, Plutarch dismissed it as a fabrication, while both Diodorus and Arrian noted that they mentioned it only for the sake of completeness.
Sent 11: The accounts were nevertheless fairly consistent in designating Antipater, recently removed as Macedonian viceroy, and at odds with Olympias, as the head of the alleged plot.
Sent 12: Perhaps taking his summons to Babylon as a death sentence, and having seen the fate of Parmenion and Philotas, Antipater purportedly arranged for Alexander to be poisoned by his son Iollas, who was Alexander's wine-pourer.
Sent 13: There was even a suggestion that Aristotle may have participated.
Sent 14: It is claimed that the strongest argument against the poison theory is the fact that twelve days passed between the start of his illness and his death; such long-acting poisons were probably not available.
Sent 15: However, in 2003 Dr Leo Schep From The New Zealand National Poisons Centre proposed in a BBC documentary investigating his death that the plant white hellebore (Veratrum album) may have been used to poison Alexander.
Sent 16: In 2014 Dr Leo Schep published this theory in the peer-reviewed medical journal Clinical Toxicology; in this journal article it was suggested Alexander's wine was spiked with Veratrum album, a plant known to the Ancient Greeks, which produces poisoning symptoms that match the course of events as described in the Alexander Romance.
Sent 17: Veratrum album poisoning can have a prolonged course and it was suggested that if Alexander was poisoned, Veratrum album offers the most plausible cause.
Sent 18: Another poisoning explanation was put forward in 2010, it was proposed that the circumstances of his death were compatible with poisoning by water of the river Styx (Mavroneri) that contained calicheamicin, a dangerous compound produced by bacteria.

Output: Arrian mentioned whose account as an alternative story about Alexander's death?


Input:
Paragraph- Sent 1: On either 10 or 11 June 323 BC, Alexander died in the palace of Nebuchadnezzar II, in Babylon, at age 32.
Sent 2: There are two different versions of Alexander's death and details of the death differ slightly in each.
Sent 3: Plutarch's account is that roughly 14 days before his death, Alexander entertained admiral Nearchus, and spent the night and next day drinking with Medius of Larissa.
Sent 4: He developed a fever, which worsened until he was unable to speak.
Sent 5: The common soldiers, anxious about his health, were granted the right to file past him as he silently waved at them.
Sent 6: In the second account, Diodorus recounts that Alexander was struck with pain after downing a large bowl of unmixed wine in honour of Heracles, followed by 11 days of weakness; he did not develop a fever and died after some agony.
Sent 7: Arrian also mentioned this as an alternative, but Plutarch specifically denied this claim.
Sent 8: Given the propensity of the Macedonian aristocracy to assassination, foul play featured in multiple accounts of his death.
Sent 9: Diodorus, Plutarch, Arrian and Justin all mentioned the theory that Alexander was poisoned.
Sent 10: Justin stated that Alexander was the victim of a poisoning conspiracy, Plutarch dismissed it as a fabrication, while both Diodorus and Arrian noted that they mentioned it only for the sake of completeness.
Sent 11: The accounts were nevertheless fairly consistent in designating Antipater, recently removed as Macedonian viceroy, and at odds with Olympias, as the head of the alleged plot.
Sent 12: Perhaps taking his summons to Babylon as a death sentence, and having seen the fate of Parmenion and Philotas, Antipater purportedly arranged for Alexander to be poisoned by his son Iollas, who was Alexander's wine-pourer.
Sent 13: There was even a suggestion that Aristotle may have participated.
Sent 14: It is claimed that the strongest argument against the poison theory is the fact that twelve days passed between the start of his illness and his death; such long-acting poisons were probably not available.
Sent 15: However, in 2003 Dr Leo Schep From The New Zealand National Poisons Centre proposed in a BBC documentary investigating his death that the plant white hellebore (Veratrum album) may have been used to poison Alexander.
Sent 16: In 2014 Dr Leo Schep published this theory in the peer-reviewed medical journal Clinical Toxicology; in this journal article it was suggested Alexander's wine was spiked with Veratrum album, a plant known to the Ancient Greeks, which produces poisoning symptoms that match the course of events as described in the Alexander Romance.
Sent 17: Veratrum album poisoning can have a prolonged course and it was suggested that if Alexander was poisoned, Veratrum album offers the most plausible cause.
Sent 18: Another poisoning explanation was put forward in 2010, it was proposed that the circumstances of his death were compatible with poisoning by water of the river Styx (Mavroneri) that contained calicheamicin, a dangerous compound produced by bacteria.

Output: Did the Greeks know of poison that had delayed effect?


Input:
Paragraph- Sent 1: On either 10 or 11 June 323 BC, Alexander died in the palace of Nebuchadnezzar II, in Babylon, at age 32.
Sent 2: There are two different versions of Alexander's death and details of the death differ slightly in each.
Sent 3: Plutarch's account is that roughly 14 days before his death, Alexander entertained admiral Nearchus, and spent the night and next day drinking with Medius of Larissa.
Sent 4: He developed a fever, which worsened until he was unable to speak.
Sent 5: The common soldiers, anxious about his health, were granted the right to file past him as he silently waved at them.
Sent 6: In the second account, Diodorus recounts that Alexander was struck with pain after downing a large bowl of unmixed wine in honour of Heracles, followed by 11 days of weakness; he did not develop a fever and died after some agony.
Sent 7: Arrian also mentioned this as an alternative, but Plutarch specifically denied this claim.
Sent 8: Given the propensity of the Macedonian aristocracy to assassination, foul play featured in multiple accounts of his death.
Sent 9: Diodorus, Plutarch, Arrian and Justin all mentioned the theory that Alexander was poisoned.
Sent 10: Justin stated that Alexander was the victim of a poisoning conspiracy, Plutarch dismissed it as a fabrication, while both Diodorus and Arrian noted that they mentioned it only for the sake of completeness.
Sent 11: The accounts were nevertheless fairly consistent in designating Antipater, recently removed as Macedonian viceroy, and at odds with Olympias, as the head of the alleged plot.
Sent 12: Perhaps taking his summons to Babylon as a death sentence, and having seen the fate of Parmenion and Philotas, Antipater purportedly arranged for Alexander to be poisoned by his son Iollas, who was Alexander's wine-pourer.
Sent 13: There was even a suggestion that Aristotle may have participated.
Sent 14: It is claimed that the strongest argument against the poison theory is the fact that twelve days passed between the start of his illness and his death; such long-acting poisons were probably not available.
Sent 15: However, in 2003 Dr Leo Schep From The New Zealand National Poisons Centre proposed in a BBC documentary investigating his death that the plant white hellebore (Veratrum album) may have been used to poison Alexander.
Sent 16: In 2014 Dr Leo Schep published this theory in the peer-reviewed medical journal Clinical Toxicology; in this journal article it was suggested Alexander's wine was spiked with Veratrum album, a plant known to the Ancient Greeks, which produces poisoning symptoms that match the course of events as described in the Alexander Romance.
Sent 17: Veratrum album poisoning can have a prolonged course and it was suggested that if Alexander was poisoned, Veratrum album offers the most plausible cause.
Sent 18: Another poisoning explanation was put forward in 2010, it was proposed that the circumstances of his death were compatible with poisoning by water of the river Styx (Mavroneri) that contained calicheamicin, a dangerous compound produced by bacteria.

Output: Alexander's timeline from good health to death began in June 323 BC according to whom?


Input:
Paragraph- Sent 1: On either 10 or 11 June 323 BC, Alexander died in the palace of Nebuchadnezzar II, in Babylon, at age 32.
Sent 2: There are two different versions of Alexander's death and details of the death differ slightly in each.
Sent 3: Plutarch's account is that roughly 14 days before his death, Alexander entertained admiral Nearchus, and spent the night and next day drinking with Medius of Larissa.
Sent 4: He developed a fever, which worsened until he was unable to speak.
Sent 5: The common soldiers, anxious about his health, were granted the right to file past him as he silently waved at them.
Sent 6: In the second account, Diodorus recounts that Alexander was struck with pain after downing a large bowl of unmixed wine in honour of Heracles, followed by 11 days of weakness; he did not develop a fever and died after some agony.
Sent 7: Arrian also mentioned this as an alternative, but Plutarch specifically denied this claim.
Sent 8: Given the propensity of the Macedonian aristocracy to assassination, foul play featured in multiple accounts of his death.
Sent 9: Diodorus, Plutarch, Arrian and Justin all mentioned the theory that Alexander was poisoned.
Sent 10: Justin stated that Alexander was the victim of a poisoning conspiracy, Plutarch dismissed it as a fabrication, while both Diodorus and Arrian noted that they mentioned it only for the sake of completeness.
Sent 11: The accounts were nevertheless fairly consistent in designating Antipater, recently removed as Macedonian viceroy, and at odds with Olympias, as the head of the alleged plot.
Sent 12: Perhaps taking his summons to Babylon as a death sentence, and having seen the fate of Parmenion and Philotas, Antipater purportedly arranged for Alexander to be poisoned by his son Iollas, who was Alexander's wine-pourer.
Sent 13: There was even a suggestion that Aristotle may have participated.
Sent 14: It is claimed that the strongest argument against the poison theory is the fact that twelve days passed between the start of his illness and his death; such long-acting poisons were probably not available.
Sent 15: However, in 2003 Dr Leo Schep From The New Zealand National Poisons Centre proposed in a BBC documentary investigating his death that the plant white hellebore (Veratrum album) may have been used to poison Alexander.
Sent 16: In 2014 Dr Leo Schep published this theory in the peer-reviewed medical journal Clinical Toxicology; in this journal article it was suggested Alexander's wine was spiked with Veratrum album, a plant known to the Ancient Greeks, which produces poisoning symptoms that match the course of events as described in the Alexander Romance.
Sent 17: Veratrum album poisoning can have a prolonged course and it was suggested that if Alexander was poisoned, Veratrum album offers the most plausible cause.
Sent 18: Another poisoning explanation was put forward in 2010, it was proposed that the circumstances of his death were compatible with poisoning by water of the river Styx (Mavroneri) that contained calicheamicin, a dangerous compound produced by bacteria.

Output: Who was said to have developed a fever that eventually worsened until people were anxious about his health?


Input:
Paragraph- Sent 1: On either 10 or 11 June 323 BC, Alexander died in the palace of Nebuchadnezzar II, in Babylon, at age 32.
Sent 2: There are two different versions of Alexander's death and details of the death differ slightly in each.
Sent 3: Plutarch's account is that roughly 14 days before his death, Alexander entertained admiral Nearchus, and spent the night and next day drinking with Medius of Larissa.
Sent 4: He developed a fever, which worsened until he was unable to speak.
Sent 5: The common soldiers, anxious about his health, were granted the right to file past him as he silently waved at them.
Sent 6: In the second account, Diodorus recounts that Alexander was struck with pain after downing a large bowl of unmixed wine in honour of Heracles, followed by 11 days of weakness; he did not develop a fever and died after some agony.
Sent 7: Arrian also mentioned this as an alternative, but Plutarch specifically denied this claim.
Sent 8: Given the propensity of the Macedonian aristocracy to assassination, foul play featured in multiple accounts of his death.
Sent 9: Diodorus, Plutarch, Arrian and Justin all mentioned the theory that Alexander was poisoned.
Sent 10: Justin stated that Alexander was the victim of a poisoning conspiracy, Plutarch dismissed it as a fabrication, while both Diodorus and Arrian noted that they mentioned it only for the sake of completeness.
Sent 11: The accounts were nevertheless fairly consistent in designating Antipater, recently removed as Macedonian viceroy, and at odds with Olympias, as the head of the alleged plot.
Sent 12: Perhaps taking his summons to Babylon as a death sentence, and having seen the fate of Parmenion and Philotas, Antipater purportedly arranged for Alexander to be poisoned by his son Iollas, who was Alexander's wine-pourer.
Sent 13: There was even a suggestion that Aristotle may have participated.
Sent 14: It is claimed that the strongest argument against the poison theory is the fact that twelve days passed between the start of his illness and his death; such long-acting poisons were probably not available.
Sent 15: However, in 2003 Dr Leo Schep From The New Zealand National Poisons Centre proposed in a BBC documentary investigating his death that the plant white hellebore (Veratrum album) may have been used to poison Alexander.
Sent 16: In 2014 Dr Leo Schep published this theory in the peer-reviewed medical journal Clinical Toxicology; in this journal article it was suggested Alexander's wine was spiked with Veratrum album, a plant known to the Ancient Greeks, which produces poisoning symptoms that match the course of events as described in the Alexander Romance.
Sent 17: Veratrum album poisoning can have a prolonged course and it was suggested that if Alexander was poisoned, Veratrum album offers the most plausible cause.
Sent 18: Another poisoning explanation was put forward in 2010, it was proposed that the circumstances of his death were compatible with poisoning by water of the river Styx (Mavroneri) that contained calicheamicin, a dangerous compound produced by bacteria.

Output: Alexander's timeline from good health to death began in May 323 BC according to whom?


Input:
Paragraph- Sent 1: On either 10 or 11 June 323 BC, Alexander died in the palace of Nebuchadnezzar II, in Babylon, at age 32.
Sent 2: There are two different versions of Alexander's death and details of the death differ slightly in each.
Sent 3: Plutarch's account is that roughly 14 days before his death, Alexander entertained admiral Nearchus, and spent the night and next day drinking with Medius of Larissa.
Sent 4: He developed a fever, which worsened until he was unable to speak.
Sent 5: The common soldiers, anxious about his health, were granted the right to file past him as he silently waved at them.
Sent 6: In the second account, Diodorus recounts that Alexander was struck with pain after downing a large bowl of unmixed wine in honour of Heracles, followed by 11 days of weakness; he did not develop a fever and died after some agony.
Sent 7: Arrian also mentioned this as an alternative, but Plutarch specifically denied this claim.
Sent 8: Given the propensity of the Macedonian aristocracy to assassination, foul play featured in multiple accounts of his death.
Sent 9: Diodorus, Plutarch, Arrian and Justin all mentioned the theory that Alexander was poisoned.
Sent 10: Justin stated that Alexander was the victim of a poisoning conspiracy, Plutarch dismissed it as a fabrication, while both Diodorus and Arrian noted that they mentioned it only for the sake of completeness.
Sent 11: The accounts were nevertheless fairly consistent in designating Antipater, recently removed as Macedonian viceroy, and at odds with Olympias, as the head of the alleged plot.
Sent 12: Perhaps taking his summons to Babylon as a death sentence, and having seen the fate of Parmenion and Philotas, Antipater purportedly arranged for Alexander to be poisoned by his son Iollas, who was Alexander's wine-pourer.
Sent 13: There was even a suggestion that Aristotle may have participated.
Sent 14: It is claimed that the strongest argument against the poison theory is the fact that twelve days passed between the start of his illness and his death; such long-acting poisons were probably not available.
Sent 15: However, in 2003 Dr Leo Schep From The New Zealand National Poisons Centre proposed in a BBC documentary investigating his death that the plant white hellebore (Veratrum album) may have been used to poison Alexander.
Sent 16: In 2014 Dr Leo Schep published this theory in the peer-reviewed medical journal Clinical Toxicology; in this journal article it was suggested Alexander's wine was spiked with Veratrum album, a plant known to the Ancient Greeks, which produces poisoning symptoms that match the course of events as described in the Alexander Romance.
Sent 17: Veratrum album poisoning can have a prolonged course and it was suggested that if Alexander was poisoned, Veratrum album offers the most plausible cause.
Sent 18: Another poisoning explanation was put forward in 2010, it was proposed that the circumstances of his death were compatible with poisoning by water of the river Styx (Mavroneri) that contained calicheamicin, a dangerous compound produced by bacteria.

Output: Which two substances have been proposed to have been the cause of Alexander's poisoning?


Input:
Paragraph- Sent 1: On either 10 or 11 June 323 BC, Alexander died in the palace of Nebuchadnezzar II, in Babylon, at age 32.
Sent 2: There are two different versions of Alexander's death and details of the death differ slightly in each.
Sent 3: Plutarch's account is that roughly 14 days before his death, Alexander entertained admiral Nearchus, and spent the night and next day drinking with Medius of Larissa.
Sent 4: He developed a fever, which worsened until he was unable to speak.
Sent 5: The common soldiers, anxious about his health, were granted the right to file past him as he silently waved at them.
Sent 6: In the second account, Diodorus recounts that Alexander was struck with pain after downing a large bowl of unmixed wine in honour of Heracles, followed by 11 days of weakness; he did not develop a fever and died after some agony.
Sent 7: Arrian also mentioned this as an alternative, but Plutarch specifically denied this claim.
Sent 8: Given the propensity of the Macedonian aristocracy to assassination, foul play featured in multiple accounts of his death.
Sent 9: Diodorus, Plutarch, Arrian and Justin all mentioned the theory that Alexander was poisoned.
Sent 10: Justin stated that Alexander was the victim of a poisoning conspiracy, Plutarch dismissed it as a fabrication, while both Diodorus and Arrian noted that they mentioned it only for the sake of completeness.
Sent 11: The accounts were nevertheless fairly consistent in designating Antipater, recently removed as Macedonian viceroy, and at odds with Olympias, as the head of the alleged plot.
Sent 12: Perhaps taking his summons to Babylon as a death sentence, and having seen the fate of Parmenion and Philotas, Antipater purportedly arranged for Alexander to be poisoned by his son Iollas, who was Alexander's wine-pourer.
Sent 13: There was even a suggestion that Aristotle may have participated.
Sent 14: It is claimed that the strongest argument against the poison theory is the fact that twelve days passed between the start of his illness and his death; such long-acting poisons were probably not available.
Sent 15: However, in 2003 Dr Leo Schep From The New Zealand National Poisons Centre proposed in a BBC documentary investigating his death that the plant white hellebore (Veratrum album) may have been used to poison Alexander.
Sent 16: In 2014 Dr Leo Schep published this theory in the peer-reviewed medical journal Clinical Toxicology; in this journal article it was suggested Alexander's wine was spiked with Veratrum album, a plant known to the Ancient Greeks, which produces poisoning symptoms that match the course of events as described in the Alexander Romance.
Sent 17: Veratrum album poisoning can have a prolonged course and it was suggested that if Alexander was poisoned, Veratrum album offers the most plausible cause.
Sent 18: Another poisoning explanation was put forward in 2010, it was proposed that the circumstances of his death were compatible with poisoning by water of the river Styx (Mavroneri) that contained calicheamicin, a dangerous compound produced by bacteria.

Output: How many people participated in the plot to kill Alexander?


Input:
Paragraph- Sent 1: On either 10 or 11 June 323 BC, Alexander died in the palace of Nebuchadnezzar II, in Babylon, at age 32.
Sent 2: There are two different versions of Alexander's death and details of the death differ slightly in each.
Sent 3: Plutarch's account is that roughly 14 days before his death, Alexander entertained admiral Nearchus, and spent the night and next day drinking with Medius of Larissa.
Sent 4: He developed a fever, which worsened until he was unable to speak.
Sent 5: The common soldiers, anxious about his health, were granted the right to file past him as he silently waved at them.
Sent 6: In the second account, Diodorus recounts that Alexander was struck with pain after downing a large bowl of unmixed wine in honour of Heracles, followed by 11 days of weakness; he did not develop a fever and died after some agony.
Sent 7: Arrian also mentioned this as an alternative, but Plutarch specifically denied this claim.
Sent 8: Given the propensity of the Macedonian aristocracy to assassination, foul play featured in multiple accounts of his death.
Sent 9: Diodorus, Plutarch, Arrian and Justin all mentioned the theory that Alexander was poisoned.
Sent 10: Justin stated that Alexander was the victim of a poisoning conspiracy, Plutarch dismissed it as a fabrication, while both Diodorus and Arrian noted that they mentioned it only for the sake of completeness.
Sent 11: The accounts were nevertheless fairly consistent in designating Antipater, recently removed as Macedonian viceroy, and at odds with Olympias, as the head of the alleged plot.
Sent 12: Perhaps taking his summons to Babylon as a death sentence, and having seen the fate of Parmenion and Philotas, Antipater purportedly arranged for Alexander to be poisoned by his son Iollas, who was Alexander's wine-pourer.
Sent 13: There was even a suggestion that Aristotle may have participated.
Sent 14: It is claimed that the strongest argument against the poison theory is the fact that twelve days passed between the start of his illness and his death; such long-acting poisons were probably not available.
Sent 15: However, in 2003 Dr Leo Schep From The New Zealand National Poisons Centre proposed in a BBC documentary investigating his death that the plant white hellebore (Veratrum album) may have been used to poison Alexander.
Sent 16: In 2014 Dr Leo Schep published this theory in the peer-reviewed medical journal Clinical Toxicology; in this journal article it was suggested Alexander's wine was spiked with Veratrum album, a plant known to the Ancient Greeks, which produces poisoning symptoms that match the course of events as described in the Alexander Romance.
Sent 17: Veratrum album poisoning can have a prolonged course and it was suggested that if Alexander was poisoned, Veratrum album offers the most plausible cause.
Sent 18: Another poisoning explanation was put forward in 2010, it was proposed that the circumstances of his death were compatible with poisoning by water of the river Styx (Mavroneri) that contained calicheamicin, a dangerous compound produced by bacteria.

Output: What plant did Dr. Leo Schep propose had poisoned Alexander and why?


Input:
Paragraph- Sent 1: On either 10 or 11 June 323 BC, Alexander died in the palace of Nebuchadnezzar II, in Babylon, at age 32.
Sent 2: There are two different versions of Alexander's death and details of the death differ slightly in each.
Sent 3: Plutarch's account is that roughly 14 days before his death, Alexander entertained admiral Nearchus, and spent the night and next day drinking with Medius of Larissa.
Sent 4: He developed a fever, which worsened until he was unable to speak.
Sent 5: The common soldiers, anxious about his health, were granted the right to file past him as he silently waved at them.
Sent 6: In the second account, Diodorus recounts that Alexander was struck with pain after downing a large bowl of unmixed wine in honour of Heracles, followed by 11 days of weakness; he did not develop a fever and died after some agony.
Sent 7: Arrian also mentioned this as an alternative, but Plutarch specifically denied this claim.
Sent 8: Given the propensity of the Macedonian aristocracy to assassination, foul play featured in multiple accounts of his death.
Sent 9: Diodorus, Plutarch, Arrian and Justin all mentioned the theory that Alexander was poisoned.
Sent 10: Justin stated that Alexander was the victim of a poisoning conspiracy, Plutarch dismissed it as a fabrication, while both Diodorus and Arrian noted that they mentioned it only for the sake of completeness.
Sent 11: The accounts were nevertheless fairly consistent in designating Antipater, recently removed as Macedonian viceroy, and at odds with Olympias, as the head of the alleged plot.
Sent 12: Perhaps taking his summons to Babylon as a death sentence, and having seen the fate of Parmenion and Philotas, Antipater purportedly arranged for Alexander to be poisoned by his son Iollas, who was Alexander's wine-pourer.
Sent 13: There was even a suggestion that Aristotle may have participated.
Sent 14: It is claimed that the strongest argument against the poison theory is the fact that twelve days passed between the start of his illness and his death; such long-acting poisons were probably not available.
Sent 15: However, in 2003 Dr Leo Schep From The New Zealand National Poisons Centre proposed in a BBC documentary investigating his death that the plant white hellebore (Veratrum album) may have been used to poison Alexander.
Sent 16: In 2014 Dr Leo Schep published this theory in the peer-reviewed medical journal Clinical Toxicology; in this journal article it was suggested Alexander's wine was spiked with Veratrum album, a plant known to the Ancient Greeks, which produces poisoning symptoms that match the course of events as described in the Alexander Romance.
Sent 17: Veratrum album poisoning can have a prolonged course and it was suggested that if Alexander was poisoned, Veratrum album offers the most plausible cause.
Sent 18: Another poisoning explanation was put forward in 2010, it was proposed that the circumstances of his death were compatible with poisoning by water of the river Styx (Mavroneri) that contained calicheamicin, a dangerous compound produced by bacteria.

Output: Alexander's wine-pourer was the son of a man who until recently held what title?


Input:
Paragraph- Sent 1: On either 10 or 11 June 323 BC, Alexander died in the palace of Nebuchadnezzar II, in Babylon, at age 32.
Sent 2: There are two different versions of Alexander's death and details of the death differ slightly in each.
Sent 3: Plutarch's account is that roughly 14 days before his death, Alexander entertained admiral Nearchus, and spent the night and next day drinking with Medius of Larissa.
Sent 4: He developed a fever, which worsened until he was unable to speak.
Sent 5: The common soldiers, anxious about his health, were granted the right to file past him as he silently waved at them.
Sent 6: In the second account, Diodorus recounts that Alexander was struck with pain after downing a large bowl of unmixed wine in honour of Heracles, followed by 11 days of weakness; he did not develop a fever and died after some agony.
Sent 7: Arrian also mentioned this as an alternative, but Plutarch specifically denied this claim.
Sent 8: Given the propensity of the Macedonian aristocracy to assassination, foul play featured in multiple accounts of his death.
Sent 9: Diodorus, Plutarch, Arrian and Justin all mentioned the theory that Alexander was poisoned.
Sent 10: Justin stated that Alexander was the victim of a poisoning conspiracy, Plutarch dismissed it as a fabrication, while both Diodorus and Arrian noted that they mentioned it only for the sake of completeness.
Sent 11: The accounts were nevertheless fairly consistent in designating Antipater, recently removed as Macedonian viceroy, and at odds with Olympias, as the head of the alleged plot.
Sent 12: Perhaps taking his summons to Babylon as a death sentence, and having seen the fate of Parmenion and Philotas, Antipater purportedly arranged for Alexander to be poisoned by his son Iollas, who was Alexander's wine-pourer.
Sent 13: There was even a suggestion that Aristotle may have participated.
Sent 14: It is claimed that the strongest argument against the poison theory is the fact that twelve days passed between the start of his illness and his death; such long-acting poisons were probably not available.
Sent 15: However, in 2003 Dr Leo Schep From The New Zealand National Poisons Centre proposed in a BBC documentary investigating his death that the plant white hellebore (Veratrum album) may have been used to poison Alexander.
Sent 16: In 2014 Dr Leo Schep published this theory in the peer-reviewed medical journal Clinical Toxicology; in this journal article it was suggested Alexander's wine was spiked with Veratrum album, a plant known to the Ancient Greeks, which produces poisoning symptoms that match the course of events as described in the Alexander Romance.
Sent 17: Veratrum album poisoning can have a prolonged course and it was suggested that if Alexander was poisoned, Veratrum album offers the most plausible cause.
Sent 18: Another poisoning explanation was put forward in 2010, it was proposed that the circumstances of his death were compatible with poisoning by water of the river Styx (Mavroneri) that contained calicheamicin, a dangerous compound produced by bacteria.

Output: How did Alexander die?


Input:
Paragraph- Sent 1: On either 10 or 11 June 323 BC, Alexander died in the palace of Nebuchadnezzar II, in Babylon, at age 32.
Sent 2: There are two different versions of Alexander's death and details of the death differ slightly in each.
Sent 3: Plutarch's account is that roughly 14 days before his death, Alexander entertained admiral Nearchus, and spent the night and next day drinking with Medius of Larissa.
Sent 4: He developed a fever, which worsened until he was unable to speak.
Sent 5: The common soldiers, anxious about his health, were granted the right to file past him as he silently waved at them.
Sent 6: In the second account, Diodorus recounts that Alexander was struck with pain after downing a large bowl of unmixed wine in honour of Heracles, followed by 11 days of weakness; he did not develop a fever and died after some agony.
Sent 7: Arrian also mentioned this as an alternative, but Plutarch specifically denied this claim.
Sent 8: Given the propensity of the Macedonian aristocracy to assassination, foul play featured in multiple accounts of his death.
Sent 9: Diodorus, Plutarch, Arrian and Justin all mentioned the theory that Alexander was poisoned.
Sent 10: Justin stated that Alexander was the victim of a poisoning conspiracy, Plutarch dismissed it as a fabrication, while both Diodorus and Arrian noted that they mentioned it only for the sake of completeness.
Sent 11: The accounts were nevertheless fairly consistent in designating Antipater, recently removed as Macedonian viceroy, and at odds with Olympias, as the head of the alleged plot.
Sent 12: Perhaps taking his summons to Babylon as a death sentence, and having seen the fate of Parmenion and Philotas, Antipater purportedly arranged for Alexander to be poisoned by his son Iollas, who was Alexander's wine-pourer.
Sent 13: There was even a suggestion that Aristotle may have participated.
Sent 14: It is claimed that the strongest argument against the poison theory is the fact that twelve days passed between the start of his illness and his death; such long-acting poisons were probably not available.
Sent 15: However, in 2003 Dr Leo Schep From The New Zealand National Poisons Centre proposed in a BBC documentary investigating his death that the plant white hellebore (Veratrum album) may have been used to poison Alexander.
Sent 16: In 2014 Dr Leo Schep published this theory in the peer-reviewed medical journal Clinical Toxicology; in this journal article it was suggested Alexander's wine was spiked with Veratrum album, a plant known to the Ancient Greeks, which produces poisoning symptoms that match the course of events as described in the Alexander Romance.
Sent 17: Veratrum album poisoning can have a prolonged course and it was suggested that if Alexander was poisoned, Veratrum album offers the most plausible cause.
Sent 18: Another poisoning explanation was put forward in 2010, it was proposed that the circumstances of his death were compatible with poisoning by water of the river Styx (Mavroneri) that contained calicheamicin, a dangerous compound produced by bacteria.

Output: What two possible dates could Alexander have entertained admiral Nearchus?


Input:
Paragraph- Sent 1: On either 10 or 11 June 323 BC, Alexander died in the palace of Nebuchadnezzar II, in Babylon, at age 32.
Sent 2: There are two different versions of Alexander's death and details of the death differ slightly in each.
Sent 3: Plutarch's account is that roughly 14 days before his death, Alexander entertained admiral Nearchus, and spent the night and next day drinking with Medius of Larissa.
Sent 4: He developed a fever, which worsened until he was unable to speak.
Sent 5: The common soldiers, anxious about his health, were granted the right to file past him as he silently waved at them.
Sent 6: In the second account, Diodorus recounts that Alexander was struck with pain after downing a large bowl of unmixed wine in honour of Heracles, followed by 11 days of weakness; he did not develop a fever and died after some agony.
Sent 7: Arrian also mentioned this as an alternative, but Plutarch specifically denied this claim.
Sent 8: Given the propensity of the Macedonian aristocracy to assassination, foul play featured in multiple accounts of his death.
Sent 9: Diodorus, Plutarch, Arrian and Justin all mentioned the theory that Alexander was poisoned.
Sent 10: Justin stated that Alexander was the victim of a poisoning conspiracy, Plutarch dismissed it as a fabrication, while both Diodorus and Arrian noted that they mentioned it only for the sake of completeness.
Sent 11: The accounts were nevertheless fairly consistent in designating Antipater, recently removed as Macedonian viceroy, and at odds with Olympias, as the head of the alleged plot.
Sent 12: Perhaps taking his summons to Babylon as a death sentence, and having seen the fate of Parmenion and Philotas, Antipater purportedly arranged for Alexander to be poisoned by his son Iollas, who was Alexander's wine-pourer.
Sent 13: There was even a suggestion that Aristotle may have participated.
Sent 14: It is claimed that the strongest argument against the poison theory is the fact that twelve days passed between the start of his illness and his death; such long-acting poisons were probably not available.
Sent 15: However, in 2003 Dr Leo Schep From The New Zealand National Poisons Centre proposed in a BBC documentary investigating his death that the plant white hellebore (Veratrum album) may have been used to poison Alexander.
Sent 16: In 2014 Dr Leo Schep published this theory in the peer-reviewed medical journal Clinical Toxicology; in this journal article it was suggested Alexander's wine was spiked with Veratrum album, a plant known to the Ancient Greeks, which produces poisoning symptoms that match the course of events as described in the Alexander Romance.
Sent 17: Veratrum album poisoning can have a prolonged course and it was suggested that if Alexander was poisoned, Veratrum album offers the most plausible cause.
Sent 18: Another poisoning explanation was put forward in 2010, it was proposed that the circumstances of his death were compatible with poisoning by water of the river Styx (Mavroneri) that contained calicheamicin, a dangerous compound produced by bacteria.

Output: Was Alexander drinking wine 2 weeks before his death?


Input:
Paragraph- Sent 1: The film begins with the announcement of the scheduled launch of a space vehicle carrying an Indian remote sensing satellite which would help scientists identify land suitable for agriculture .
Sent 2: Within a short range of this operation , in the same forest , the state forest department runs an NCC camp for women cadets .
Sent 3: Dhuruvan is a trainer at the camp .
Sent 4: Being a Scheduled tribe , he is deprecated for being positioned as a cadet officer in the forest security force through reservation system by his senior officer Ganapathiram .
Sent 5: But Dhuruvan 's integrity and co-living with other tribes in the forest abnegates aboriginal allegations by other forward caste officials and cadets in the department .
Sent 6: As a part of the training camp , an expedition is organized into the forest for a selected five cadets from the troop .
Sent 7: Dhuruvan selects the five most insolent and disobedient girls in the troop for the expedition intending to provide them better training .
Sent 8: As an attempt at a practical joke , the haughty girls post a complaint to Ganapathiram claiming that they did n't feel safe with Dhuruvan and that he was responsible for whatever that was to happen to them .
Sent 9: Meanwhile , the expedition begins and while Dhuruvan is caught up in some procedures at the forest check post , the girls non-chanlantly try to drive the jeep and run it down the slope of a hill .
Sent 10: After losing their vehicle , the troop decides to stay in the forest for the night and go by an alternate route the next morning .
Sent 11: But the plot thickens , when Kalpana describes two white men with advanced armaments in the Indian forest heading towards the direction of the Indian satellite research station in the forest .

Output: What camp is Dhuruvan at?


Input:
Paragraph- Sent 1: The film begins with the announcement of the scheduled launch of a space vehicle carrying an Indian remote sensing satellite which would help scientists identify land suitable for agriculture .
Sent 2: Within a short range of this operation , in the same forest , the state forest department runs an NCC camp for women cadets .
Sent 3: Dhuruvan is a trainer at the camp .
Sent 4: Being a Scheduled tribe , he is deprecated for being positioned as a cadet officer in the forest security force through reservation system by his senior officer Ganapathiram .
Sent 5: But Dhuruvan 's integrity and co-living with other tribes in the forest abnegates aboriginal allegations by other forward caste officials and cadets in the department .
Sent 6: As a part of the training camp , an expedition is organized into the forest for a selected five cadets from the troop .
Sent 7: Dhuruvan selects the five most insolent and disobedient girls in the troop for the expedition intending to provide them better training .
Sent 8: As an attempt at a practical joke , the haughty girls post a complaint to Ganapathiram claiming that they did n't feel safe with Dhuruvan and that he was responsible for whatever that was to happen to them .
Sent 9: Meanwhile , the expedition begins and while Dhuruvan is caught up in some procedures at the forest check post , the girls non-chanlantly try to drive the jeep and run it down the slope of a hill .
Sent 10: After losing their vehicle , the troop decides to stay in the forest for the night and go by an alternate route the next morning .
Sent 11: But the plot thickens , when Kalpana describes two white men with advanced armaments in the Indian forest heading towards the direction of the Indian satellite research station in the forest .

Output: What happens to make the cadets stay in the forest overnight?


Input:
Paragraph- Sent 1: The film begins with the announcement of the scheduled launch of a space vehicle carrying an Indian remote sensing satellite which would help scientists identify land suitable for agriculture .
Sent 2: Within a short range of this operation , in the same forest , the state forest department runs an NCC camp for women cadets .
Sent 3: Dhuruvan is a trainer at the camp .
Sent 4: Being a Scheduled tribe , he is deprecated for being positioned as a cadet officer in the forest security force through reservation system by his senior officer Ganapathiram .
Sent 5: But Dhuruvan 's integrity and co-living with other tribes in the forest abnegates aboriginal allegations by other forward caste officials and cadets in the department .
Sent 6: As a part of the training camp , an expedition is organized into the forest for a selected five cadets from the troop .
Sent 7: Dhuruvan selects the five most insolent and disobedient girls in the troop for the expedition intending to provide them better training .
Sent 8: As an attempt at a practical joke , the haughty girls post a complaint to Ganapathiram claiming that they did n't feel safe with Dhuruvan and that he was responsible for whatever that was to happen to them .
Sent 9: Meanwhile , the expedition begins and while Dhuruvan is caught up in some procedures at the forest check post , the girls non-chanlantly try to drive the jeep and run it down the slope of a hill .
Sent 10: After losing their vehicle , the troop decides to stay in the forest for the night and go by an alternate route the next morning .
Sent 11: But the plot thickens , when Kalpana describes two white men with advanced armaments in the Indian forest heading towards the direction of the Indian satellite research station in the forest .

Output: What film begins with the announcement of the scheduled launch?


Input:
Paragraph- Sent 1: The film begins with the announcement of the scheduled launch of a space vehicle carrying an Indian remote sensing satellite which would help scientists identify land suitable for agriculture .
Sent 2: Within a short range of this operation , in the same forest , the state forest department runs an NCC camp for women cadets .
Sent 3: Dhuruvan is a trainer at the camp .
Sent 4: Being a Scheduled tribe , he is deprecated for being positioned as a cadet officer in the forest security force through reservation system by his senior officer Ganapathiram .
Sent 5: But Dhuruvan 's integrity and co-living with other tribes in the forest abnegates aboriginal allegations by other forward caste officials and cadets in the department .
Sent 6: As a part of the training camp , an expedition is organized into the forest for a selected five cadets from the troop .
Sent 7: Dhuruvan selects the five most insolent and disobedient girls in the troop for the expedition intending to provide them better training .
Sent 8: As an attempt at a practical joke , the haughty girls post a complaint to Ganapathiram claiming that they did n't feel safe with Dhuruvan and that he was responsible for whatever that was to happen to them .
Sent 9: Meanwhile , the expedition begins and while Dhuruvan is caught up in some procedures at the forest check post , the girls non-chanlantly try to drive the jeep and run it down the slope of a hill .
Sent 10: After losing their vehicle , the troop decides to stay in the forest for the night and go by an alternate route the next morning .
Sent 11: But the plot thickens , when Kalpana describes two white men with advanced armaments in the Indian forest heading towards the direction of the Indian satellite research station in the forest .

Output: who is  dhuruvan?


Input:
Paragraph- Sent 1: The film begins with the announcement of the scheduled launch of a space vehicle carrying an Indian remote sensing satellite which would help scientists identify land suitable for agriculture .
Sent 2: Within a short range of this operation , in the same forest , the state forest department runs an NCC camp for women cadets .
Sent 3: Dhuruvan is a trainer at the camp .
Sent 4: Being a Scheduled tribe , he is deprecated for being positioned as a cadet officer in the forest security force through reservation system by his senior officer Ganapathiram .
Sent 5: But Dhuruvan 's integrity and co-living with other tribes in the forest abnegates aboriginal allegations by other forward caste officials and cadets in the department .
Sent 6: As a part of the training camp , an expedition is organized into the forest for a selected five cadets from the troop .
Sent 7: Dhuruvan selects the five most insolent and disobedient girls in the troop for the expedition intending to provide them better training .
Sent 8: As an attempt at a practical joke , the haughty girls post a complaint to Ganapathiram claiming that they did n't feel safe with Dhuruvan and that he was responsible for whatever that was to happen to them .
Sent 9: Meanwhile , the expedition begins and while Dhuruvan is caught up in some procedures at the forest check post , the girls non-chanlantly try to drive the jeep and run it down the slope of a hill .
Sent 10: After losing their vehicle , the troop decides to stay in the forest for the night and go by an alternate route the next morning .
Sent 11: But the plot thickens , when Kalpana describes two white men with advanced armaments in the Indian forest heading towards the direction of the Indian satellite research station in the forest .

Output: How much range of the operation?


Input:
Paragraph- Sent 1: The film begins with the announcement of the scheduled launch of a space vehicle carrying an Indian remote sensing satellite which would help scientists identify land suitable for agriculture .
Sent 2: Within a short range of this operation , in the same forest , the state forest department runs an NCC camp for women cadets .
Sent 3: Dhuruvan is a trainer at the camp .
Sent 4: Being a Scheduled tribe , he is deprecated for being positioned as a cadet officer in the forest security force through reservation system by his senior officer Ganapathiram .
Sent 5: But Dhuruvan 's integrity and co-living with other tribes in the forest abnegates aboriginal allegations by other forward caste officials and cadets in the department .
Sent 6: As a part of the training camp , an expedition is organized into the forest for a selected five cadets from the troop .
Sent 7: Dhuruvan selects the five most insolent and disobedient girls in the troop for the expedition intending to provide them better training .
Sent 8: As an attempt at a practical joke , the haughty girls post a complaint to Ganapathiram claiming that they did n't feel safe with Dhuruvan and that he was responsible for whatever that was to happen to them .
Sent 9: Meanwhile , the expedition begins and while Dhuruvan is caught up in some procedures at the forest check post , the girls non-chanlantly try to drive the jeep and run it down the slope of a hill .
Sent 10: After losing their vehicle , the troop decides to stay in the forest for the night and go by an alternate route the next morning .
Sent 11: But the plot thickens , when Kalpana describes two white men with advanced armaments in the Indian forest heading towards the direction of the Indian satellite research station in the forest .

Output: Give the name of one of the most insolent and disobedient girls.?


Input:
Paragraph- Sent 1: The film begins with the announcement of the scheduled launch of a space vehicle carrying an Indian remote sensing satellite which would help scientists identify land suitable for agriculture .
Sent 2: Within a short range of this operation , in the same forest , the state forest department runs an NCC camp for women cadets .
Sent 3: Dhuruvan is a trainer at the camp .
Sent 4: Being a Scheduled tribe , he is deprecated for being positioned as a cadet officer in the forest security force through reservation system by his senior officer Ganapathiram .
Sent 5: But Dhuruvan 's integrity and co-living with other tribes in the forest abnegates aboriginal allegations by other forward caste officials and cadets in the department .
Sent 6: As a part of the training camp , an expedition is organized into the forest for a selected five cadets from the troop .
Sent 7: Dhuruvan selects the five most insolent and disobedient girls in the troop for the expedition intending to provide them better training .
Sent 8: As an attempt at a practical joke , the haughty girls post a complaint to Ganapathiram claiming that they did n't feel safe with Dhuruvan and that he was responsible for whatever that was to happen to them .
Sent 9: Meanwhile , the expedition begins and while Dhuruvan is caught up in some procedures at the forest check post , the girls non-chanlantly try to drive the jeep and run it down the slope of a hill .
Sent 10: After losing their vehicle , the troop decides to stay in the forest for the night and go by an alternate route the next morning .
Sent 11: But the plot thickens , when Kalpana describes two white men with advanced armaments in the Indian forest heading towards the direction of the Indian satellite research station in the forest .

Output: What type of vehicle did Dhuruvan and the cadets loose?


Input:
Paragraph- Sent 1: The film begins with the announcement of the scheduled launch of a space vehicle carrying an Indian remote sensing satellite which would help scientists identify land suitable for agriculture .
Sent 2: Within a short range of this operation , in the same forest , the state forest department runs an NCC camp for women cadets .
Sent 3: Dhuruvan is a trainer at the camp .
Sent 4: Being a Scheduled tribe , he is deprecated for being positioned as a cadet officer in the forest security force through reservation system by his senior officer Ganapathiram .
Sent 5: But Dhuruvan 's integrity and co-living with other tribes in the forest abnegates aboriginal allegations by other forward caste officials and cadets in the department .
Sent 6: As a part of the training camp , an expedition is organized into the forest for a selected five cadets from the troop .
Sent 7: Dhuruvan selects the five most insolent and disobedient girls in the troop for the expedition intending to provide them better training .
Sent 8: As an attempt at a practical joke , the haughty girls post a complaint to Ganapathiram claiming that they did n't feel safe with Dhuruvan and that he was responsible for whatever that was to happen to them .
Sent 9: Meanwhile , the expedition begins and while Dhuruvan is caught up in some procedures at the forest check post , the girls non-chanlantly try to drive the jeep and run it down the slope of a hill .
Sent 10: After losing their vehicle , the troop decides to stay in the forest for the night and go by an alternate route the next morning .
Sent 11: But the plot thickens , when Kalpana describes two white men with advanced armaments in the Indian forest heading towards the direction of the Indian satellite research station in the forest .

Output: Was Dhuruvan apart of a camp?


Input:
Paragraph- Sent 1: The film begins with the announcement of the scheduled launch of a space vehicle carrying an Indian remote sensing satellite which would help scientists identify land suitable for agriculture .
Sent 2: Within a short range of this operation , in the same forest , the state forest department runs an NCC camp for women cadets .
Sent 3: Dhuruvan is a trainer at the camp .
Sent 4: Being a Scheduled tribe , he is deprecated for being positioned as a cadet officer in the forest security force through reservation system by his senior officer Ganapathiram .
Sent 5: But Dhuruvan 's integrity and co-living with other tribes in the forest abnegates aboriginal allegations by other forward caste officials and cadets in the department .
Sent 6: As a part of the training camp , an expedition is organized into the forest for a selected five cadets from the troop .
Sent 7: Dhuruvan selects the five most insolent and disobedient girls in the troop for the expedition intending to provide them better training .
Sent 8: As an attempt at a practical joke , the haughty girls post a complaint to Ganapathiram claiming that they did n't feel safe with Dhuruvan and that he was responsible for whatever that was to happen to them .
Sent 9: Meanwhile , the expedition begins and while Dhuruvan is caught up in some procedures at the forest check post , the girls non-chanlantly try to drive the jeep and run it down the slope of a hill .
Sent 10: After losing their vehicle , the troop decides to stay in the forest for the night and go by an alternate route the next morning .
Sent 11: But the plot thickens , when Kalpana describes two white men with advanced armaments in the Indian forest heading towards the direction of the Indian satellite research station in the forest .

Output: Name of a trainer at the camp?


Input:
Paragraph- Sent 1: The film begins with the announcement of the scheduled launch of a space vehicle carrying an Indian remote sensing satellite which would help scientists identify land suitable for agriculture .
Sent 2: Within a short range of this operation , in the same forest , the state forest department runs an NCC camp for women cadets .
Sent 3: Dhuruvan is a trainer at the camp .
Sent 4: Being a Scheduled tribe , he is deprecated for being positioned as a cadet officer in the forest security force through reservation system by his senior officer Ganapathiram .
Sent 5: But Dhuruvan 's integrity and co-living with other tribes in the forest abnegates aboriginal allegations by other forward caste officials and cadets in the department .
Sent 6: As a part of the training camp , an expedition is organized into the forest for a selected five cadets from the troop .
Sent 7: Dhuruvan selects the five most insolent and disobedient girls in the troop for the expedition intending to provide them better training .
Sent 8: As an attempt at a practical joke , the haughty girls post a complaint to Ganapathiram claiming that they did n't feel safe with Dhuruvan and that he was responsible for whatever that was to happen to them .
Sent 9: Meanwhile , the expedition begins and while Dhuruvan is caught up in some procedures at the forest check post , the girls non-chanlantly try to drive the jeep and run it down the slope of a hill .
Sent 10: After losing their vehicle , the troop decides to stay in the forest for the night and go by an alternate route the next morning .
Sent 11: But the plot thickens , when Kalpana describes two white men with advanced armaments in the Indian forest heading towards the direction of the Indian satellite research station in the forest .

Output: Who in camp has reservations about Dhuruvan?