Stoltcnberp;-,\llen. Baum;urn, and D:irling-f'ishcr (2002). 3. Jnterdew. Another major method of tlala-gathcrini,: is the interview. Ont.-! type of interview is comp le lin~ a health history for e. tch family member. The health hi Rtory dctt~rmine.-. current ill',1lth status lin:::ed on :-;ignilicant p;1st hc,1lth history t C,l?, dc"clnpnwnlol,H"CLHt1plishmr11ts. knnwn illnesses, allcrgks. restorati\'{c' trc,1lmcnl, r Psidenl'l: in endemic :1rcas for certain disc;. 1:,,p. s or c'~l"'""n. s In 1-·01111111111k:1hh· rlisenscs): family hislory (e. g. genetic hii,lory in relation lu health :md illness) and s,xial history, such . 1s intraf)<!rsnnal and intcq)ersun;il fadon, :iffcctin JJ. the family member· s social adjnslmcnt or vulner,1bility In stres:,;. mu cri!,is (Clemen-Slone anu <1thcn; l99l, p. :;?71). A second type of interview is c. :olleclin~ tlaltl by personally asking significnnt fnmilr 111crnh L·1·:a 111· rdnti\'CS quc:ations rq::arding he.-i!Lh, famil~· lifc c:qwric111·cs 1111d home L'11vini111111. !ut lo ~,·n Prnll' data 011 what wellness cnndilin11/s and lwallh prnhl,·ms,·xisl in lh,· fomily (Fit"!<l­ lcvr. l,\s. ~P. ~sm,·111. $L'· Tr1hl,· 2_!. !) :ind I lw l'nn-cspomlin;: f:unilr m11 sing problems for. :a..:h hl'allh,·m1Jitin11 nr pr0hlo. :rn (Scenncl-lc, ·cl As:;\. 'ssmc 11t. Table 2. 2). "nsuriu~ 1:nntid, 11tialily anti rnspe L"l for lhe family\; ri~ht lo self-clctcrmination arc key pri11ciplcs It> considur during all phases of the nnrsing prm:e:;s. The uun;c can also collect infurm:ition rrn111 cnllr. agur. s who work "ilh the family llt'<·Ordin. ; to their pnrticular scrvic·c spcci;1ltics as well os school pcri;onncl, employers, significant olhc1·s anti communi ty worker~ who can giw reliable and rr>lcv,rnt inforn1alion on lht. > famil~s lire. 111d experiences. Pn1cluct·ivil'y of lhu inlcniow process d(1pcnds upon the use of effective communicalio11 l Lchniquc:-tu l. 'licil the needed rc. <;ponsc s-. One major prol>lcm t'lll'l HLILLL'rcd by prutt ii ion er,: in gal htring dnl a (,. specially for the sccond-1,:,·el a~,-. cs:-;rncnt) is how In dctvrmi11t' whcr P the dienl is i11 terms of perception of the health tnndi Lion nr prnhll'n1 and the p:illerns ofrnping utiliz1'fl Ill rc.-;uln or 11ddrr. :. ~ it. There i~ a lcnclr1wy :111H,11J1. community health 1111rsc·s to r P:ulily ~in. ! out ad1·icc. hi. :allh lcac·hings or s,>lutions once they ha\'C itlenlified Lh<' h<alt h t·onditir111s t1r pr11blc111s. Thlrc are,·rlj· few instance$ when they ddcrminc first the dic11l0s pcrcrption of the hciilth condition or problem. tllll rciim1rccs in clct11ing with it he. fore they take at. :Livn or do nursing inlcr-·cntions. lntet·vicw ques6ons and communic;ition techniques must be guided by theorelkal perspectives in family heallh earl". Rlspecl, trust and cot11iclenliolity are crilkal v,ilues to 111ai11t,1i11 when t:onclu<"t ing the interview. Confidence on Lhc m:e of t:l\mmnnicnlion techniques c. :an come after bcini; familiar with nnd being L't. m1pete11t 011 the t L<;C of types of q11c. c;tio11s tli:H aim to e-..plrwc, validillt., t:larifr. offer fc(db:1ck, encourage vcrbaliwtions of lhouv. hts 1111d fceli11f;S, and offer m:e<led support or rcass11 rnncc. Second-level nsscs. smcnt cm1 be adeqnatc J~, done for each wcllnr. _<t<; stntc, health threat, health deficit or cri~is situntion by going through the followill H sl CJJS with family nicmbt. :rs who may need lo help each other validate interview data un rcaliti«::. ~ or experience.-; regarding performance 59 