218 gement of r-elatlons w Ttll wlder ·ty Stren,th or Empowerment {2007) lnterven n Leadership Networking, Organization Pollttcal power Skills Trust Unlty Wealth. Bartle (::woo) admits that t·hese elements can not e. asily be measured using a checklist to quantify community strength. Wass (2000) agrees that there are limitations to quantitative approacl1es a Jooe hence, evaluating any activity needs to be built around methods appropriate to the program and where the participation of the people can b. e maximized. Qualitative methods sucl1 as conununity observations, interviews i1nd discussions with the people can generate an abundance of data and information necessary to measure community change. These methods have been discussed in the previous chapter. If the nurse expects the community members to take part in the evaluation, tools to measure change ioitiat;ve outcomes must be uscr. :friendly, easy to admini. ster, and written in a language that is clear or compre hensible. Aside from ensuring reliability and validity of tools or instruments, the nurse should also make certaia that community members assigned to partake in the evaluation are well-trained in the use of the tools. · Participatory Evaluation : The Nagcarlan-UP Manila College of Nursing Experience Tcrmlnadon Phas~ Ma11111n1t wlln __ ~--'I wlll9rsoc!«J COMMUNITY Moblllz,e 