Astrónomos españoles descubren un planeta 'inexplicable' que ...
En el caso del nuevo planeta, el observatorio WASP sur detectó este tipo de variaciones lumínicas durante las dos sesiones de grabación. Gracias ...
estudio
"No sabemos dónde colocar este planeta en todas las teorías de formación que tenemos ahora mismo porque es un caso atípico a todas ellas", explicó el coautor del <anchor>estudio</anchor> publicado recientemente en la revista Nature Astronomy, Francisco Pozuelos, que es investigador del Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía. "No podemos explicar cómo se formó este planeta basándonos en los modelos clásicos de evolución".
An extended low-density atmosphere around the Jupiter-sized planet WASP-193 b | Nature Astronomy
Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain
the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in
Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles
and JavaScript.

Advertisement

- Article
- Published: 14 May 2024

# An extended low-density atmosphere around the Jupiter-sized planet WASP-193 b

Show authors

### Subjects

## Abstract

Gas giants transiting bright nearby stars provide crucial insights into planetary system formation and evolution mechanisms. Most of these planets show certain average characteristics, serving as benchmarks for our understanding of planetary systems. However, outliers like the planet we present in this study, WASP-193 b, offer unique opportunities to explore unconventional formation and evolution processes. This planet completes an orbit around its V-band-magnitude 12.2 F9 main-sequence host star every 6.25 days. Our analyses found that WASP-193 b has a mass of 0.139 ± 0.029 M J and a radius of 1.464 ± 0.058 R J, translating into an extremely low density of 0.059 ± 0.014g cm−3, at least one order of magnitude less than standard gas giants like Jupiter. Typical gas giants such as Jupiter have densities that range between 0.2 g cm−3 and 2 g cm−3. The combination of its large transit depth (1.4%), extremely low density, high-equilibrium temperature (1,254 ± 31 K) and the infrared brightness of its host star ( K-band magnitude 10.7) makes WASP-193 b an exquisite target for characterization by transmission spectroscopy (transmission spectroscopy metric ~600). One single JWST transit observation would yield detailed insights into its atmospheric properties and planetary mass, providing a unique window to explore the mechanisms behind its exceptionally low density and shed light on giant planets’ diverse nature.

## Access options

Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals

Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription

$29.99 / 30 days

cancel any time

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles

$119.00 per year

only $9.92 per issue

Buy this article

- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

### Additional access options:

Fig. 1: Photometric and spectroscopic follow-up.



Fig. 2: Planetary diagrams of known transiting exoplanets with radius and mass precisions better than 8% and 25%, respectively.



Fig. 3: Planetary radius as a function of age for two evolution models.



Fig. 4: Feasibility of WASP-193 b for transmission spectroscopy studies.



Fig. 5: WASP-193 b as an exquisite target for atmospheric characterization.



### Similar content being viewed by others



### Transit detection of the long-period volatile-rich super-Earth ν2 Lupi d with CHEOPS

Article28 June 2021



### The metal-poor atmosphere of a potential sub-Neptune progenitor

ArticleOpen access09 May 2024



### Rapid contraction of giant planets orbiting the 20-million-year-old star V1298 Tau

Article02 December 2021

## Data availability

The TRAPPIST-South and SPECULOOS-South data analysed are available at CDS via anonymous ftp at http://cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr/ (130.79.128.5). The HARPS and CORALIE data analysed are available in the European Southern Observatory archive (ESO; http://archive.eso.org/cms.html) The TESS data analysed are available in the Mikulski Archive for Space Telescopes (MAST; https://archive.stsci.edu/). Source data are provided with this paper.

## Code availability

The Prose and MCMC codes used for this paper are publicly available.

## References

1. Pollacco, D. L. et al. The WASP project and the SuperWASP cameras. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 118, 1407–1418 (2006).

   ADS Google Scholar

2. Gillon, M. et al. TRAPPIST: a robotic telescope dedicated to the study of planetary systems. EPJ Web Conf 11, 06002 (2011).

   Google Scholar

3. Jehin, E. et al. The SPECULOOS Southern Observatory begins its hunt for rocky planets. The Messenger 174, 2–7 (2018).

   ADS Google Scholar

4. Ricker, G. R. et al. Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS). J. Astron. Telesc. Instrum. Syst. 1, 014003 (2015).

   ADS Google Scholar

5. Queloz, D. et al. Extrasolar planets in the Southern Hemisphere: the CORALIE survey. In From Extrasolar Planets to Cosmology: The VLT Opening Symposium (eds Bergeron, J. & Renzini, A.) 548–555 (Springer, 2000).

6. Mayor, M. et al. Setting new standards with HARPS. The Messenger 114, 20–24 (2003).

   ADS Google Scholar

7. Torres, G., Konacki, M., Sasselov, D. D. & Jha, S. Testing blend scenarios for extrasolar transiting planet candidates. I. OGLE-TR-33: a false positive. Astrophys. J. 614, 979–989 (2004).

   ADS Google Scholar

8. Doyle, A. P. et al. Accurate spectroscopic parameters of WASP planet host stars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 428, 3164–3172 (2013).

   ADS Google Scholar

9. Gaia Collaboration. VizieR Online Data Catalog: Gaia EDR3 (Gaia Collaboration, 2020). VizieR Online Data Catalog https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020yCat.1350....0G (2020).

10. Eastman, J. D. et al. EXOFASTv2: a public, generalized, publication-quality exoplanet modeling code. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.09480 (2019).

11. Scuflaire, R. et al. CLÉS, Code Liégeois d’Évolution Stellaire. Astrophys. Space Sci. 316, 83–91 (2008).

    ADS Google Scholar

12. Salmon, S. J. A. J., Van Grootel, V., Buldgen, G., Dupret, M. A. & Eggenberger, P. Reinvestigating α Centauri AB in light of asteroseismic forward and inverse methods. Astron. Astrophys. 646, A7 (2021).

    Google Scholar

13. Gillon, M. et al. The TRAPPIST survey of southern transiting planets. I. Thirty eclipses of the ultra-short period planet WASP-43 b. Astron. Astrophys. 542, A4 (2012).

    Google Scholar

14. Mandel, K. & Agol, E. Analytic light curves for planetary transit searches. Astrophys. J. Lett. 580, L171–L175 (2002).

    ADS Google Scholar

15. Murray, C. D. & Correia, A. C. M. in Exoplanets (ed. Seager, S.) 15–23 (Univ. Arizona Press, 2010).

16. Luque, R. & Pallé, E. Density, not radius, separates rocky and water-rich small planets orbiting M dwarf stars. Science 377, 1211–1214 (2022).

    ADS Google Scholar

17. Fortney, J. J., Marley, M. S. & Barnes, J. W. Planetary radii across five orders of magnitude in mass and stellar insolation: application to transits. Astrophys. J. 659, 1661–1672 (2007).

    ADS Google Scholar

18. Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G. & Barman, T. Structure and evolution of super-Earth to super-Jupiter exoplanets. I. Heavy element enrichment in the interior. Astron. Astrophys. 482, 315–332 (2008).

    ADS Google Scholar

19. Weiss, L. M. et al. The mass of KOI-94d and a relation for planet radius, mass, and incident flux. Astrophys. J. 768, 14 (2013).

    ADS Google Scholar

20. Sestovic, M., Demory, B.-O. & Queloz, D. Investigating hot-Jupiter inflated radii with hierarchical Bayesian modelling. Astron. Astrophys. 616, A76 (2018).

    Google Scholar

21. Lopez, E. D. & Fortney, J. J. Re-inflated warm Jupiters around red giants. Astrophys. J. 818, 4 (2016).

    ADS Google Scholar

22. Helled, R. et al. in Protostars and Planets VI (eds Beuther, H. et al.) 665 (Univ. Arizona Press, 2014).

23. Deng, H., Mayer, L. & Helled, R. Formation of intermediate-mass planets via magnetically controlled disk fragmentation. Nat. Astron. 5, 440–444 (2021).

    ADS Google Scholar

24. Müller, S. & Helled, R. Synthetic evolution tracks of giant planets. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 507, 2094–2102 (2021).

    ADS Google Scholar

25. Marley, M. S., Fortney, J. J., Hubickyj, O., Bodenheimer, P. & Lissauer, J. J. On the luminosity of young Jupiters. Astrophys. J. 655, 541–549 (2007).

    ADS Google Scholar

26. Chabrier, G., Mazevet, S. & Soubiran, F. A new equation of state for dense hydrogen–helium mixtures. Astrophys. J. 872, 51 (2019).

    ADS Google Scholar

27. More, R., Warren, K., Young, D. & Zimmerman, G. A new quotidian equation of state (QEOS) for hot dense matter. Phys. Fluids 31, 3059–3078 (1988).

    ADS Google Scholar

28. Freedman, R. S. et al. Gaseous mean opacities for giant planet and ultracool dwarf atmospheres over a range of metallicities and temperatures. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 214, 25 (2014).

    ADS Google Scholar

29. Choi, J. et al. Mesa Isochrones and Stellar Tracks (MIST). I. Solar-scaled models. Astrophys. J. 823, 102 (2016).

    ADS Google Scholar

30. Dotter, A. MESA Isochrones and Stellar Tracks (MIST) 0: methods for the construction of stellar isochrones. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 222, 8 (2016).

    ADS Google Scholar

31. Teske, J. K., Thorngren, D., Fortney, J. J., Hinkel, N. & Brewer, J. M. Do metal-rich stars make metal-rich planets? New insights on giant planet formation from host star abundances. Astron. J. 158, 239 (2019).

    ADS Google Scholar

32. Müller, S., Helled, R. & Cumming, A. The challenge of forming a fuzzy core in Jupiter. Astron. Astrophys. 638, A121 (2020).

    ADS Google Scholar

33. Poser, A. J., Nettelmann, N. & Redmer, R. The effect of clouds as an additional opacity source on the inferred metallicity of giant exoplanets. Atmosphere 10, 664 (2019).

    ADS Google Scholar

34. Vazan, A., Helled, R. & Guillot, T. Jupiter’s evolution with primordial composition gradients. Astron. Astrophys. 610, L14 (2018).

    ADS Google Scholar

35. Leconte, J. & Chabrier, G. A new vision of giant planet interiors: impact of double diffusive convection. Astron. Astrophys. 540, A20 (2012).

    ADS Google Scholar

36. Kurokawa, H. & Inutsuka, S.-i On the radius anomaly of hot jupiters: reexamination of the possibility and impact of layered convection. Astrophys. J. 815, 78 (2015).

    ADS Google Scholar

37. Stevenson, D. & Salpeter, E. The dynamics and helium distribution in hydrogen-helium fluid planets. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 35, 239–261 (1977).

    ADS Google Scholar

38. Fortney, J. J. & Hubbard, W. Effects of helium phase separation on the evolution of extrasolar giant planets. Astrophys. J. 608, 1039 (2004).

    ADS Google Scholar

39. Laughlin, G., Crismani, M. & Adams, F. C. On the anomalous radii of the transiting extrasolar planets. Astrophys. J. Lett. 729, L7 (2011).

    ADS Google Scholar

40. Fortney, J. J., Dawson, R. I. & Komacek, T. D. Hot jupiters: origins, structure, atmospheres. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 126, e2020JE006629 (2021).

    ADS Google Scholar

41. Thorngren, D. P. & Fortney, J. J. Bayesian analysis of hot-Jupiter radius anomalies: evidence for ohmic dissipation? Astron. J. 155, 214 (2018).

    ADS Google Scholar

42. Fossati, L. et al. Aeronomical constraints to the minimum mass and maximum radius of hot low-mass planets. Astron. Astrophys. 598, A90 (2017).

    Google Scholar

43. Kempton, E. M. R. et al. A framework for prioritizing the TESS planetary candidates most amenable to atmospheric characterization. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 130, 114401 (2018).

    ADS Google Scholar

44. Niraula, P. et al. The impending opacity challenge in exoplanet atmospheric characterization. Nat. Astron. 6, 1287–1295 (2022).

    ADS Google Scholar

45. Niraula, P., de Wit, J., Gordon, I. E., Hargreaves, R. J. & Sousa-Silva, C. Origin and extent of the opacity challenge for atmospheric retrievals of WASP-39 b. Astrophys. J. Lett. 950, L17 (2023).

    ADS Google Scholar

46. de Wit, J. & Seager, S. Constraining exoplanet mass from transmission spectroscopy. Science 342, 1473–1477 (2013).

    ADS Google Scholar

47. Seager, S. & Sasselov, D. D. Theoretical transmission spectra during extrasolar giant planet transits. Astrophys. J. 537, 916–921 (2000).

    ADS Google Scholar

48. Allart, R. et al. Spectrally resolved helium absorption from the extended atmosphere of a warm Neptune-mass exoplanet. Science 362, 1384–1387 (2018).

    ADS Google Scholar

49. Feinstein, A. D. et al. Early release science of the exoplanet WASP-39b with JWST NIRISS. Nature 614, 670–675 (2023).

    ADS Google Scholar

50. Mordasini, C., van Boekel, R., Mollière, P., Henning, T. & Benneke, B. The imprint of exoplanet formation history on observable present-day spectra of hot Jupiters. Astrophys. J. 832, 41 (2016).

    ADS Google Scholar

51. Meylan, G., Madrid, J. P. & Macchetto, D. Hubble Space Telescope science metrics. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 116, 790–796 (2004).

    ADS Google Scholar

52. Pepe, F. A. et al. in Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy III Vol. 7735 (eds McLean, I. S. et al.) 209–217 (SPIE, 2010).

53. Dressler, A. et al. IMACS: the Inamori-Magellan Areal Camera and Spectrograph on Magellan-Baade. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 123, 288–332 (2011).

    ADS Google Scholar

54. Gardner, J. P. et al. The James Webb Space Telescope. Space Sci. Rev. 123, 485–606 (2006).

    ADS Google Scholar

55. Sing, D. K. et al. A continuum from clear to cloudy hot-Jupiter exoplanets without primordial water depletion. Nature 529, 59–62 (2016).

    ADS Google Scholar

56. Wakeford, H. R. et al. HST PanCET program: a cloudy atmosphere for the promising JWST target WASP-101b. Astrophys. J. 835, L12 (2017).

    ADS Google Scholar

57. Sing, D. K. et al. The Hubble Space Telescope PanCET program: exospheric Mg ii and Fe ii in the near-ultraviolet transmission spectrum of WASP-121b using jitter decorrelation. Astron. J. 158, 91 (2019).

    ADS Google Scholar

58. Skaf, N. et al. ARES. II. Characterizing the hot jupiters WASP-127 b, WASP-79 b, and WASP-62b with the Hubble Space Telescope. Astron. J. 160, 109 (2020).

    ADS Google Scholar

59. Collier Cameron, A. et al. A fast hybrid algorithm for exoplanetary transit searches. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 373, 799–810 (2006).

    ADS Google Scholar

60. Street, R. A. et al. Status of SuperWASP I (La Palma). Astron. Nach. 325, 565–567 (2004).

    ADS Google Scholar

61. Jehin, E. et al. TRAPPIST: Transiting Planets and Planetesimals Small Telescope. The Messenger 145, 2–6 (2011).

    ADS Google Scholar

62. Barkaoui, K. et al. Discovery of three new transiting hot Jupiters: WASP-161 b, WASP-163 b, and WASP-170 b. Astron. J. 157, 43 (2019).

    ADS Google Scholar

63. Garcia, L. J. et al. PROSE: a Python framework for modular astronomical images processing. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 509, 4817–4828 (2021).

    ADS Google Scholar

64. Burdanov, A., Delrez, L., Gillon, M. & Jehin, E. in Handbook of Exoplanets (eds Deeg, H. J. & Belmonte, J. A.) 130 (Springer, 2017).

65. Delrez, L. et al. SPECULOOS: a network of robotic telescopes to hunt for terrestrial planets around the nearest ultracool dwarfs. Proc. SPIE 10700, 107001I (2018).

    Google Scholar

66. Burdanov, A. Y. et al. SPECULOOS Northern Observatory: searching for red worlds in the northern skies. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 134, 105001 (2022).

    ADS Google Scholar

67. Demory, B. O. et al. A super-Earth and a sub-Neptune orbiting the bright, quiet M3 dwarf TOI-1266. Astron. Astrophys. 642, A49 (2020).

    Google Scholar

68. Stumpe, M. C. et al. Kepler presearch data conditioning I—architecture and algorithms for error correction in Kepler light curves. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 124, 985 (2012).

    ADS Google Scholar

69. Smith, J. C. et al. Kepler presearch data conditioning II—a Bayesian approach to systematic error correction. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 124, 1000 (2012).

    ADS Google Scholar

70. Stumpe, M. C. et al. Multiscale systematic error correction via wavelet-based bandsplitting in Kepler data. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 126, 114 (2014).

    Google Scholar

71. Baranne, A. et al. ELODIE: a spectrograph for accurate radial velocity measurements. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 119, 373–390 (1996).

    ADS Google Scholar

72. Zechmeister, M. & Kürster, M. The generalised Lomb–Scargle periodogram. A new formalism for the floating-mean and Keplerian periodograms. Astron. Astrophys. 496, 577–584 (2009).

    ADS Google Scholar

73. Doyle, A. P., Davies, G. R., Smalley, B., Chaplin, W. J. & Elsworth, Y. Determining stellar macroturbulence using asteroseismic rotational velocities from Kepler. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 444, 3592–3602 (2014).

    ADS Google Scholar

74. Bruntt, H. et al. Accurate fundamental parameters for 23 bright solar-type stars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 405, 1907–1923 (2010).

    ADS Google Scholar

75. Gray, R. O. & Corbally, C. J. An expert computer program for classifying stars on the MK spectral classification system. Astron. J. 147, 80 (2014).

    ADS Google Scholar

76. Eastman, J., Gaudi, B. S. & Agol, E. EXOFAST: a fast exoplanetary fitting suite in IDL. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 125, 83 (2013).

    ADS Google Scholar

77. Gelman, A. & Rubin, D. B. Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Stat. Sci. 7, 457–472 (1992).

    Google Scholar

78. Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S. & Rubin, D. B. Bayesian Data Analysis 2nd edn (Chapman & Hall, 2003).

79. Henden, A. A. et al. VizieR Online Data Catalog: AAVSO Photometric All Sky Survey (APASS) DR9 (Henden+, 2016). VizieR Online Data Catalog https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016yCat.2336....0H (2016).

80. Cutri, R. M. et al. 2MASS All Sky Catalog of Point Sources (2003); https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003tmc..book.....C

81. Wright, E. L. et al. The Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE): mission description and initial on-orbit performance. Astron. J. 140, 1868–1881 (2010).

    ADS Google Scholar

82. Stassun, K. G. & Torres, G. Evidence for a systematic offset of −80 μas in the Gaia DR2 parallaxes. Astrophys. J. 862, 61 (2018).

    ADS Google Scholar

83. Schlafly, E. F. & Finkbeiner, D. P. Measuring reddening with Sloan Digital Sky Survey stellar spectra and recalibrating SFD. Astrophys. J. 737, 103 (2011).

    ADS Google Scholar

84. Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A. J. & Scott, P. The chemical composition of the Sun. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 47, 481–522 (2009).

    ADS Google Scholar

85. Schwarz, G. Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann. Stat. 6, 461–464 (1978).

    MathSciNet Google Scholar

86. Claret, A. & Bloemen, S. Gravity and limb-darkening coefficients for the Kepler, CoRoT, Spitzer, uvby, UBVRIJHK, and Sloan photometric systems. Astron. Astrophys. 529, A75 (2011).

    ADS Google Scholar

87. wangenmarkers, E.-J. A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 14, 779–804 (2007).

    Google Scholar

88. Maxted, P. F. L. et al. Five transiting hot Jupiters discovered using WASP-South, Euler, and TRAPPIST: WASP-119 b, WASP-124 b, WASP-126 b, WASP-129 b, and WASP-133 b. Astron. Astrophys. 591, A55 (2016).

    Google Scholar

89. Jontof-Hutter, D., Dalba, P. A. & Livingston, J. H. TESS observations of Kepler systems with transit timing variations. Astron. J. 164, 42 (2022).

    ADS Google Scholar

90. Anderson, D. R. et al. Thermal emission at 4.5 and 8 μm of WASP-17b, an extremely large planet in a slightly eccentric orbit. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 416, 2108–2122 (2011).

    ADS Google Scholar

91. Lam, K. W. F. et al. From dense hot Jupiter to low-density Neptune: the discovery of WASP-127b, WASP-136b, and WASP-138b. Astron. Astrophys. 599, A3 (2017).

    Google Scholar

92. Hartman, J. D. et al. HAT-P-65b and HAT-P-66b: two transiting inflated hot jupiters and observational evidence for the reinflation of close-in giant planets. Astron. J. 152, 182 (2016).

    ADS Google Scholar

93. Demory, B.-O. & Seager, S. Lack of Inflated radii for Kepler giant planet candidates receiving modest stellar irradiation. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 197, 12 (2011).

    ADS Google Scholar

## Acknowledgements

WASP-South is hosted by the South African Astronomical Observatory and we are grateful for their ongoing support and assistance. Funding for WASP comes from consortium universities and from the UK’s Science and Technology Facilities Council. The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the FP/2007–2013 ERC grant agreement no. 336480, and under the H2020 ERC grant agreement no. 679030; and from an Actions de Recherche Concertée (ARC) grant, financed by the Wallonia-Brussels Federation. The Euler Swiss telescope by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF). This work has been carried out in part within the framework of the NCCR PlanetS supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation. This study is based on observations collected at the European Southern Observatory under ESO programme 0102.C-0414, principal investigator L.D.N. TRAPPIST-South is funded by the Belgian National Fund for Scientific Research (F.R.S.-FNRS) under grant PDR T.0120.21, with the participation of the Swiss National Science Fundation (SNF). M.G. is F.R.S.-FNRS Research Director and E.J. is F.R.S.-FNRS Senior Research Associate. V.V.G. is an F.R.S.-FNRS Research Associate. The postdoctoral fellowship of K.B. is funded by F.R.S.-FNRS grant T.0109.20 and by the Francqui Foundation. This publication benefits from the support of the French Community of Belgium in the context of the FRIA Doctoral Grant awarded to M.T. The ULiege’s contribution to SPECULOOS has received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP/2007-2013) (grant agreement no. 336480/SPECULOOS), from the Balzan Prize Foundation, from the Belgian Scientific Research Foundation (F.R.S.-FNRS; grant no. T.0109.20), from the University of Liege, and from the ARC grant for Concerted Research Actions financed by the Wallonia-Brussels Federation. This work is supported by a grant from the Simons Foundation (principal investigator D.Q., grant number 327127). J.d.W. and MIT gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Heising-Simons Foundation, Mrs. C. Masson, Masson and P. A. Gilman for Artemis, the first telescope of the SPECULOOS network situated in Tenerife, Spain. This work is supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (PP00P2-163967, PP00P2-190080 and the National Centre for Competence in Research PlanetS). This work has received fund from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement no. 803193/BEBOP), from the MERAC foundation, and from the Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC; grant no. ST/S00193X/1). C.D. was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) under grant PZ00P2_174028. M.L. acknowledges support of the Swiss National Science Foundation under grant number PCEFP2_194576. E.D. is a Paris Region Fellow and acknowledges support from the innovation and research Horizon 2020 programme in the context of the Marie Sklodowska-Curie subvention 945298. F.J.P. acknowledges financial support from the grant CEX2021-001131-S funded by MCIN/AEI/ 10.13039/501100011033 and through projects PID2019-109522GB-C52 and PID2022-137241NB-C43.

## Author information

### Authors and Affiliations

1. Astrobiology Research Unit, Université de Liège, Liège, Belgium

   Khalid Barkaoui, Francisco J. Pozuelos, Michaël Gillon, Mourad Ghachoui, Laetitia Delrez, Lionel Garcia & Mathilde Timmermans

2. Oukaimeden Observatory, High Energy Physics and Astrophysics Laboratory, Faculty of sciences Semlalia, Cadi Ayyad University, Marrakech, Morocco

   Khalid Barkaoui, Abderahmane Soubkiou, Mourad Ghachoui, Zouhair Benkhaldoun & Abdelhadi Jabiri

3. Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA

   Khalid Barkaoui, Prajwal Niraula, Julien de Wit & Artem Burdanov

4. Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias (IAC), La Laguna, Spain

   Khalid Barkaoui

5. Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía (IAA-CSIC), Granada, Spain

   Francisco J. Pozuelos

6. Astrophysics Group, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK

   Coel Hellier, Barry Smalley & Pierre F. L. Maxted

7. Observatoire de Genève, Université de Genève, Sauverny, Switzerland

   Louise D. Nielsen, Francois Bouchy, Monika Lendl, Didier Queloz, Oliver Turner & Stephane Udry

8. European Southern Observatory, Garching bei München, Germany

   Louise D. Nielsen

9. Department of Astrophysics, University of Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland

   Simon Müller, Caroline Dorn & Ravit Helled

10. Space Sciences, Technologies and Astrophysics Research (STAR) Institute, Université de Liège, Liège, Belgium

    Emmanuel Jehin, Valerie Van Grootel & Laetitia Delrez

11. Center for Space and Habitability, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

    Brice-Olivier Demory

12. Instituto de Astrofisica e Ciencias do Espaco, Universidade do porto, CAUP, Porto, Portugal

    Abderahmane Soubkiou

13. Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK

    David. R. Anderson & Richard G. West

14. LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, CNRS, Université Paris Diderot, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France

    Elsa Ducrot

15. Université Paris-Saclay, Université Paris Cité, CEA, CNRS, AIM, Paris, France

    Elsa Ducrot

16. Center for Computational Astrophysics, Flatiron Institute, New York, NY, USA

    Lionel Garcia

17. Department of Astrophysical and Planetary Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA

    Catriona A. Murray

18. Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge, UK

    Peter Pihlmann Pedersen & Didier Queloz

19. School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK

    Daniel Sebastian & Amaury H. M. J. Triaud

20. Space Forge, Cardiff, UK

    Oliver Turner

21. Centre for Exoplanets and Habitability, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK

    Richard G. West

Authors

### Contributions

K.B. led the project and performed and interpreted the global analyses with support from F.J.P. and M. Gillon. F.J.P. led the interpretation of the results and writing of the paper. P.N. and J.d.W. performed the assessment of atmospheric characterization suitability. C.H., O.T., D.R.A., S.U. and R.G.W. performed the WASP-South observation and data reduction. C.D., R.H. and S.M. performed planet interior models and interpretation of the results. B.S., V.V.G., P.F.L.M., A.S. and M. Ghachoui performed spectroscopic data, stellar evolutionary models and SED analysis. L.D.N., F.B. and M.L. performed radial velocity measurements. E.J., E.D., C.A.M. and P.P.P. performed photometric follow-ups using TRAPPIST-South and SPECULOOS-South facilities and data reduction using Prose. All co-authors read and commented on the paper and helped with its revision.

### Corresponding authors

## Ethics declarations

### Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

## Peer review

### Peer review information

Nature Astronomy thanks Thomas Wilson and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

## Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Supplementary information

### Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–5 and Tables 1–5.

### Supplementary Data

WASP-South photometric data.

## Source data

### Source Data Fig. 1

Space and ground-based photometry and RVs.

## Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

## About this article

### Cite this article

Barkaoui, K., Pozuelos, F.J., Hellier, C. et al. An extended low-density atmosphere around the Jupiter-sized planet WASP-193 b.
Nat Astron 8, 909–919 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-024-02259-y

- Received: 02 March 2022

- Accepted: 27 March 2024

- Published: 14 May 2024

- Issue Date: July 2024

- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-024-02259-y

### Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Get shareable link

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Copy to clipboard

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Advertisement

## Explore content

## About the journal

## Publish with us

## Search

Search articles by subject, keyword or author

Show results fromAll journalsThis journal

Search

### Quick links

Nature Astronomy ( Nat Astron)
ISSN2397-3366 (online)

## nature.com sitemap

### About Nature Portfolio

### Discover content

### Publishing policies

### Author & Researcher services

### Libraries & institutions

### Advertising & partnerships

### Professional development

### Regional websites

© 2024 Springer Nature Limited

Close bannerClose

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Email address

Sign up

I agree my information will be processed in accordance with the Nature and Springer Nature Limited Privacy Policy.

Close bannerClose