The Use of Instagram and TikTok in Relation to Problematic Use and ...
Additionally, this study examined individuals' emotional investment (value attributed to “likes” and social media followers) on each platform ...
The Use of Instagram and TikTok in Relation to Problematic Use and Well-Being \| Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science

[Skip to main content](#main)

[![SpringerLink](/oscar-static/images/darwin/header/img/logo-springerlink-39ee2a28d8.svg)](https://link.springer.com)

[Log in](https://idp.springer.com/auth/personal/springernature?redirect_uri=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6)

[Menu](#eds-c-header-nav)

[Find a journal](https://link.springer.com/journals/) [Publish with us](https://www.springernature.com/gp/authors) [Track your research](https://link.springernature.com/home/)

[Search](#eds-c-header-popup-search)

[Cart](https://order.springer.com/public/cart)

1. [Home](/)
2. [Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science](/journal/41347)
3. Article

# The Use of Instagram and TikTok in Relation to Problematic Use and Well-Being

- [Open access](https://www.springernature.com/gp/open-research/about/the-fundamentals-of-open-access-and-open-research)
- Published: 04 March 2024

- (2024)

- [Cite this article](#citeas)

[Download PDF](/content/pdf/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6.pdf)

You have full access to this [open access](https://www.springernature.com/gp/open-research/about/the-fundamentals-of-open-access-and-open-research) article

[![](https://media.springernature.com/w72/springer-static/cover-hires/journal/41347?as=webp)Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science](/journal/41347) [Aims and scope](https://link.springer.com/journal/41347/aims-and-scope) [Submit manuscript](https://www.editorialmanager.com/JTBS)

The Use of Instagram and TikTok in Relation to Problematic Use and Well-Being


[Download PDF](/content/pdf/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6.pdf)

- [Calanthe Hendrikse](#auth-Calanthe-Hendrikse-Aff1) [1](#Aff1) &
- [Maria Limniou](#auth-Maria-Limniou-Aff1)[ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6317-4038](http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6317-4038)[1](#Aff1)

- 4806 Accesses

- 12 Altmetric

- 1 Mention

- [Explore all metrics](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6/metrics)


## Abstract

Much of the existing literature on the influence of social media use on well-being has focused on Facebook. Additionally, there exist inconsistencies in how different aspects of social media use (i.e., duration, problematic use, and emotional investment) impact well-being. Thus, the present study aimed to investigate how engagement with social media (Instagram and TikTok) was related to problematic social media use and mental well-being. Additionally, this study examined individuals’ emotional investment (value attributed to “likes” and social media followers) on each platform and how this related to problematic social media use and well-being. In this correlational study, 252 participants completed an online questionnaire including validated scales (e.g., the Rosenberg self-esteem scale) and items measuring the time spent on each platform (minutes per day) and the importance of likes, and followers. Time spent on TikTok was a significant positive predictor of problematic social media use, depression, and self-esteem, however, did not predict loneliness. Time spent on Instagram was a significant positive predictor of problematic social media use, but not any other well-being factors. These latter findings highlight the need to investigate additional factors related to how individuals are using social media, as duration is not a sufficient predictor of well-being. Problematic social media use was a significant positive predictor of depression and self-esteem, but not loneliness. Emotional investment varied in predicting problematic social media use and well-being across the two social media platforms. Present findings may alert clinical psychologists to the importance of monitoring social media use in clinical populations.

### Similar content being viewed by others

![](https://media.springernature.com/w215h120/springer-static/image/art%3Aplaceholder%2Fimages/placeholder-figure-springernature.png)

### [Problematic use of five different social networking sites is associated with depressive symptoms and loneliness](https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12144-024-05925-6?fromPaywallRec=false)

Article04 April 2024

![](https://media.springernature.com/w215h120/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12144-022-03505-0/MediaObjects/12144_2022_3505_Fig1_HTML.png)

### [An exploratory analysis of the relationship of problematic Facebook use with loneliness and self-esteem: the mediating roles of extraversion and self-presentation](https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12144-022-03505-0?fromPaywallRec=false)

Article08 August 2022

![](https://media.springernature.com/w215h120/springer-static/image/art%3Aplaceholder%2Fimages/placeholder-figure-springernature.png)

### [Differences between Facebook and Instagram Usage in Regard to Problematic Use and Well-Being](https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41347-021-00229-z?fromPaywallRec=false)

ArticleOpen access13 October 2021

[Use our pre-submission checklist](https://beta.springernature.com/pre-submission?journalId=41347)

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

## Introduction

Social media (SM) platforms are defined as web-based communication platforms that allow users to easily connect with others and consume content (Aichner et al., [2021](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR2 "Aichner, T., Grünfelder, M., Maurer, O., & Jegeni, D. (2021). Twenty-five years of social media: A review of social media applications and definitions from 1994 to 2019. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 24(4), 215–222.                  https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2020.0134                                ")). These platforms are a ubiquitous presence in modern society with over 4.5 billion users worldwide, and projections suggest this will continue to increase rapidly (Statista, [2023a](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR90 "Statista. (2023a). Social media users worldwide 2019–2028.                  https://www-statista-com.liverpool.idm.oclc.org/forecasts/1146659/social-media-users-in-the-world                                ")). Young adults are the most frequent users of these sites as 88% of 18–29-year-olds report social media use (SMU) in some capacity each day (Statista, [2023b](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR91 "Statista. (2023b). Instagram: Distribution of global audiences 2023, by age and gender.                  https://www.statista.com/statistics/248769/age-distribution-of-worldwide-instagram-users/                                "), [c](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR92 "Statista. (2023c). TikTok: Distribution of global audiences 2023, by age and gender.                  https://www.statista.com/statistics/1299771/tiktok-global-user-age-distribution/                                ")). Users are also spending an increasing number of hours on these sites, with individuals reporting an average of three hours per day (Statista, [2022a](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR88 "Statista. (2022a). Daily social media usage worldwide. Statista.                  https://www.statista.com/statistics/433871/daily-social-media-usage-worldwide/                                ")). The growth and increase in popularity of SM have sparked an interest in research attempting to understand how SMU influences psychological well-being outcomes (Andreassen, [2015](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR4 "Andreassen, C. S. (2015). Online social network site addiction: A comprehensive review. Current Addiction Reports, 2(2), 175–184.                  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-015-0056-9                                "); Petropoulos Petalas et al., [2021](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR72 "Petropoulos Petalas, D., Konijn, E. A., Johnson, B. K., Veldhuis, J., Bij de Vaate, N. A. J. D., Burgers, C., Droog, E., Międzobrodzka, E., Balint, K. E., & van de Schoot, R. (2021). Plurality in the measurement of social media use and mental health: An exploratory study among adolescents and young adults. Social Media + Society, 7(3).                  https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211035353                                ")). Well-being consists of components such as self-esteem, and those who lack well-being in their lives are at greater risk for depression and loneliness (Wood & Joseph, [2010](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR105 "Wood, A. M., & Joseph, S. (2010). The absence of positive psychological (eudemonic) well-being as a risk factor for depression: A ten year cohort study. Journal of Affective Disorders, 122(3), 213–217.                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2009.06.032                                ")).

Self-esteem is the most common indicator of well-being and is defined as an individual’s subjective value judgement of the self (Rosenberg, [1965a](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR78 "Rosenberg, M. (1965a). Rosenberg self-esteem scale (RSE). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. Measures Package, 61(52), 18."), [b](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR79 "Rosenberg, M. (1965b). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton University Press.")). For many, it is a stable trait; however, it may fluctuate for others (Harter & Whitesell, [2003](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR36 "Harter, S., & Whitesell, N. R. (2003). Beyond the debate: Why some adolescents report stable self-worth over time and situation, whereas others report changes in self-worth. Journal of Personality, 71(6), 1027–1058.                  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.7106006                                ")). Low self-esteem is associated with numerous forms of mental distress, including depression (Nguyen et al., [2019](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR67 "Nguyen, D. T., Wright, E. P., Dedding, C., Pham, T. T., & Bunders, J. (2019). Low self-esteem and its association with anxiety, depression, and suicidal ideation in Vietnamese secondary school students: A cross-sectional study. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10, 698.                  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00698                                ")) and addiction (Faelens et al., [2021](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR28 "Faelens, L., Hoorelbeke, K., Cambier, R., van Put, J., Van de Putte, E., Rudi De Raedt, R., & Koster, E. H. W. (2021). The relationship between Instagram use and indicators of mental health: A systematic review. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 4, 100121.                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100121                                ")). Self-esteem may be enhanced or deflated based on cognitive processes that can be influenced by SMU (Krause et al., [2019](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR47 "Krause, H.-V., Baum, K., Baumann, A., & Krasnova, H. (2019). Unifying the detrimental and beneficial effects of social network site use on self-esteem: A systematic literature review. Media Psychology, 24(1), 1–38.                  https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2019.1656646                                ")). The Sociometer Theory (Leary, [2005](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR50 "Leary, M. R. (2005). Sociometer theory and the pursuit of relational value: Getting to the root of self-esteem. European Review of Social Psychology, 16(1), 75–111.                  https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280540000007                                ")) suggests self-esteem is calibrated to indicators of inclusion or rejection in the social environment. Receiving “likes” and followers may enhance self-esteem through feelings of inclusion and approval; however, these same metrics may reduce self-esteem when lacking (Burrow & Rainone, [2017](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR15 "Burrow, A. L., & Rainone, N. (2017). How many likes did I get?: Purpose moderates links between positive social media feedback and self-esteem. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 69(69), 232–236.                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.09.005                                "); Limniou et al., [2022](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR53 "Limniou, M., Ascroft, Y., & McLean, S. (2022). Differences between Facebook and Instagram usage in regard to problematic use and well-being. Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science, 7, 141–150.                  https://doi.org/10.1007/s41347-021-00229-z                                ")). Additionally, more frequent SMU has been linked to lower self-esteem through social comparisons and ostracization (Bergagna & Tartaglia, [2018](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR10 "Bergagna, E., & Tartaglia, S. (2018). Self-esteem, social comparison, and Facebook use. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 14(4), 831–845.                  https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v14i4.1592                                "); Jan et al., [2017](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR41 "Jan, M., Soomro, S. A., & Ahmad, N. (2017). Impact of social media on self-esteem. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 13(23), 329–341.                  https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2017.v13n23p329                                ")). On SM, social comparisons are ever-present because comparison information (e.g., “likes” and follower counts) is highly noticeable (Jiang & Ngien, [2020](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR43 "Jiang, S., & Ngien, A. (2020). The effects of Instagram use, social comparison, and self-esteem on social anxiety: A survey study in Singapore. Social Media + Society, 6(2).                  https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120912488                                ")). Furthermore, the Need-Threat model (NTM; Williams, [2009](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR103 "Williams, K. D. (2009). Ostracism: A temporal need-threat model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 275–314.                  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)00406-1                                ")) suggests that when users do not receive desired feedback, they may feel ostracised. Social media users may experience cyber-ostracisation in instances where they perceive themselves to not have gained sufficient likes (Dumas et al., [2020](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR27 "Dumas, T. M., Maxwell-Smith, M. A., Tremblay, P. F., Litt, D. M., & Ellis, W. (2020). Gaining likes, but at what cost? Longitudinal relations between young adults’ deceptive like-seeking on Instagram, peer belonging and self-esteem. Computers in Human Behavior, 112, 106467.                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106467                                "); Reich, Schneider & Zwillich, [2023](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR76 "Reich, S., Schneider, F. M., & Zwillich, B. (2023). No likes–no control? Examining the role of coping deprivation and social anxiety in social media ostracism. Behaviour & Information Technology, 43(2), 284–297.                  https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2022.2161938                                ")). Thus, this may lead to reduced self-esteem (Lutz & Schneider, [2020](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR56 "Lutz, S., & Schneider, F. M. (2020). Is receiving dislikes in social media still better than being ignored? The effects of ostracism and rejection on need threat and coping responses online. Media Psychology, 24(6), 741–765.                  https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2020.1799409                                ")) which may be alleviated through deceptive engagement with social media (Dumas et al., [2017](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR26 "Dumas, T. M., Maxwell-Smith, M., Davis, J. P., & Giulietti, P. A. (2017). Lying or longing for likes? Narcissism, peer belonging, loneliness and normative versus deceptive like-seeking on Instagram in emerging adulthood. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 1–10.                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.037                                ")).

SMU can also impact social relationships as it provides easy and near-constant access to other people (Subramanian, [2017](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR95 "Subramanian, K. R. (2017). Influence of social media in interpersonal communication. International Journal of Scientific Progress and Research, 38(109), 70–75.")). Although the heightened interpersonal connectivity provided by SM may be assumed to relate to overall increases in social well-being, loneliness remains a persistent problem in societies where SMU is high (e.g., the UK) (O’Day et al., [2021](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR68 "O’Day, E. B., & Heimberg, R. G. (2021). Social media use, social anxiety, and loneliness: A systematic review. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 3(100070), 100070.                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100070                                "); Pittman & Reich, [2016](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR73 "Pittman, M., & Reich, B. (2016). Social media and loneliness: Why an Instagram picture may be worth more than a thousand Twitter words. Computers in Human Behavior, 62(62), 155–167.                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.084                                ")). Loneliness is a common human experience of perceived isolation and is made up of social and emotional components (Cacioppo et al., [2014](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR17 "Cacioppo, J. T., Cacioppo, S., & Boomsma, D. I. (2014). Evolutionary mechanisms for loneliness. Cognition & Emotion, 28(1), 3–21.                  https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2013.837379                                ")). It is important to understand what variables influence loneliness due to its impact on mental and physical well-being. For example, as suggested by the Social Enhancement hypothesis (Gadekar & Ang, [2020](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR32 "Gadekar, R., & Ang, P. H. (2020). Is social media use socially enhancing or compensating? Journal of Creative Communications, 15(3), 269–288.                  https://doi.org/10.1177/0973258620943705                                ")), SM may ameliorate loneliness through the creation of new social connections and the strengthening of existing ones (Ostic et al., [2021](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR70 "Ostic, D., Qalati, S. A., Barbosa, B., Shah, S. M. M., Galvan Vela, E., Herzallah, A. M., & Liu, F. (2021). Effects of social media use on psychological well-being: A mediated model. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 678766.                  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.678766                                ")). Furthermore, users may also experience feelings of social acceptance and inclusion through receiving “likes” and gaining “followers” (Bradley et al., [2019](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR12 "Bradley, S. W., Roberts, J. A., & Bradley, P. W. (2019). Experimental evidence of observed social media status cues on perceived likability. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 8(1), 41–51.                  https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000164                                "); Burrow & Rainone, [2017](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR15 "Burrow, A. L., & Rainone, N. (2017). How many likes did I get?: Purpose moderates links between positive social media feedback and self-esteem. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 69(69), 232–236.                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.09.005                                "); Moreton & Greenfield, [2022](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR65 "Moreton, L., & Greenfield, S. (2022). University students’ views on the impact of Instagram on mental wellbeing: A qualitative study. BMC Psychology, 10, 45.                  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-022-00743-6                                ")). However, these findings do not explain why reports of loneliness continue to rise. Some research posits that SM creates an isolating experience as others appear happier, healthier, and more successful than themselves (Jiang & Ngien, [2020](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR43 "Jiang, S., & Ngien, A. (2020). The effects of Instagram use, social comparison, and self-esteem on social anxiety: A survey study in Singapore. Social Media + Society, 6(2).                  https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120912488                                "); O’Day et al., [2021](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR68 "O’Day, E. B., & Heimberg, R. G. (2021). Social media use, social anxiety, and loneliness: A systematic review. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 3(100070), 100070.                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100070                                ")). Online relationships may also enhance loneliness due to the reduced intimacy of online (vs offline) relationships (Matook et al., [2015](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR60 "Matook, S., Cummings, J., & Bala, H. (2015). Are you feeling lonely? The impact of relationship characteristics and online social network features on loneliness. Journal of Management Information Systems, 31(4), 278–310.                  https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2014.1001282                                "); Taylor & Lay, [2024](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR96 "Taylor, J., & Lay, J. (2024). Chapter ten - The relationship between social media use and perceptions of online and offline loneliness during social distancing restrictions. In V. Benson (Ed.), Handbook of social media use online relationships, security, privacy, and society (Vol 2, pp. 217–243). Academic Press.")). Additionally, spending excessive time on SM may take away from face-to-face interactions which results in feelings of loneliness (see Displacement Theory; Gruner, [2016](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR34 "Gruner, D. T. (2016). New digital media and flow: A study of experience Creativity. Theories - Research - Applications, 3(2), 343–362.                  https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2016-0021                                "); Caba Machado et al., [2023](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR16 "Caba Machado, V., Mcilroy, D., Padilla Adamuz, F. M., et al. (2023). The associations of use of social network sites with perceived social support and loneliness. Current Psychology, 42, 14414–14427.                  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02673-9                                ")). The relationship between SMU and loneliness remains ambiguous, and a better understanding of this relationship may help reduce occurrences of this distressing experience.

Depression is another form of psychological distress experienced abundantly and is ranked as the third leading cause of disability-adjusted life years in Western Europe (World Health Organisation, [2023](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR106 "World Health Organization. (2023). Depressive disorder (depression). World Health Organization.                  https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/depression                                ")). Although many factors contribute to depression, there is a growing interest in SMU as an instigating factor. Studies investigating this relationship have yielded mixed results (Adeyanju et al., [2021](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR1 "Adeyanju, G. C., Solfa, R. P., Tran, T. L., et al. (2021). Behavioural symptoms of mental health disorder such as depression among young people using Instagram: A systematic review. Transitional and Medicine Communication, 6, 15.                  https://doi.org/10.1186/s41231-021-00092-3                                "); Hartanto et al., [2021](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR35 "Hartanto, A., Quek, F. Y., Tng, G. Y., & Yong, J. C. (2021). Does social media use increase depressive symptoms? A reverse causation perspective. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12, 641934.                  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.641934                                ")). Some evidence suggests SMU can help alleviate negative mood through active (vs passive) use (Valkenburg et al., [2022](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR98 "Valkenburg, P. M., van Driel, I. I., & Beyens, I. (2022). The associations of active and passive social media use with well-being: A critical scoping review. New Media & Society, 24(2), 530–549.                  https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211065425                                "); Verduyn et al., [2017](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR101 "Verduyn, P., Ybarra, O., Résibois, M., Jonides, J., & Kross, E. (2017). Do Social network sites enhance or undermine subjective well-being? A critical review. Social Issues and Policy Review, 11(1), 274–302.                  https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12033                                ")), offers of social support (Neubaum & Kramer, [2015](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR66 "Neubaum, G., & Krämer, N. C. (2015). My friends right next to me: A laboratory investigation on predictors and consequences of experiencing social closeness on social networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(8), 443–449.                  https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2014.0613                                "); Meshi & Ellithorpe, [2021](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR62 "Meshi, D., & Ellithorpe, M. E. (2021). Problematic social media use and social support received in real-life versus on social media: Associations with depression, anxiety and social isolation. Addictive Behaviors, 119, 106949.                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.106949                                ")), and interruptions to ruminating thought patterns (Wolfers & Schneider, [2021](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR104 "Wolfers, L. N., & Schneider, F. M. (2021). Using media for coping: A scoping review. Communication Research, 48(8), 1210–1234.                  https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650220939778                                ")). However, more frequently, SMU is associated with increased depressive symptoms (Cunningham et al., [2021](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR22 "Cunningham, S., Hudson, C. C., & Harkness, K. (2021). Social media and depression symptoms: A meta-analysis. Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, 49(2), 241–253.                  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-020-00715-7                                "); Lopes et al., [2022](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR54 "Lopes, L. S., Valentini, J. P., Monteiro, T. H., Costacurta, M. C. de F., Soares, L. O. N., Telfar-Barnard, L., & Nunes, P. V. (2022). Problematic social media use and its relationship with depression or anxiety: A systematic review. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 25(11), 691–702.                  https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2021.0300                                ")). SMU may become depressing when users engage in social comparison as envy is frequently reported as a predictor of depression (Appel et al., [2016](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR6 "Appel, H., Gerlach, A. L., & Crusius, J. (2016). The interplay between Facebook use, social comparison, envy, and depression. Current Opinion in Psychology, 9, 44–49.                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.10.006                                "); Carraturo et al., [2023](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR19 "Carraturo, F., Di Perna, T., Giannicola, V., Nacchia, M. A., Pepe, M., Muzii, B., & Scandurra, C. (2023). Envy, social comparison, and depression on social networking sites: A systematic review. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 13(2), 364–376.                  https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13020027                                ")). As with loneliness, SMU may relate to depression through the displacement of activities that bring meaning and joy (e.g., exercise and face-to-face interactions; Brailovskaia & Margraf, [2020](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR13 "Brailovskaia, J., & Margraf, J. (2020). Relationship between depression symptoms, physical activity, and addictive social media use. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 23(12), 818–822.                  https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2020.0255                                ")). Again, the relationship between SMU and depression is ambiguous, and developing a better understanding of this relationship may have positive impacts on the occurrences of depression in society.

It has been further suggested that SM may create a unique social pressure always to be available (Carbonell & Panova, [2016](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR18 "Carbonell, X., & Panova, T. (2016). A critical consideration of social networking sites’ addiction potential. Addiction Research & Theory, 25(1), 48–57.                  https://doi.org/10.1080/16066359.2016.1197915                                ")). Indeed, some users have reported experiencing distress and anxiety when they are not able to access SM and even neglecting important needs (e.g., eating, drinking, and physical activity) in favour of spending time online (Valkenburg, [2022](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR97 "Valkenburg, P. M. (2022). Social media use and well-being: What we know and what we need to know. Current Opinion in Psychology, 45, 101294.                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.12.006                                ")). This obsessive engagement has been described in the literature as Problematic Social Media Use (PSMU) which is defined by the following three core factors: (1) an inability to control use, (2) functional impairment, and (3) continued use of SM regardless of negative impact (Chamberlain et al., [2016](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR20 "Chamberlain, S. R., Lochner, C., Stein, D. J., Goudriaan, A. E., van Holst, R. J., Zohar, J., & Grant, J. E. (2016). Behavioural addiction—A rising tide? European Neuropsychopharmacology, 26(5), 841–855.                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.08.013                                ")). Research has linked PSMU to negative mental well-being (Banjanin et al., [2015](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR9 "Banjanin, N., Banjanin, N., Dimitrijevic, I., & Pantic, I. (2015). Relationship between internet use and depression: Focus on physiological mood oscillations, social networking and online addictive behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 43, 308–312.                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.013                                ")) possibly through increased social comparison opportunities, and feelings of inferiority if “friends” online appear to have more fulfilling lives than one’s own (Verduyn et al., [2020](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR100 "Verduyn, P., Gugushvili, N., Massar, K., Täht, K., & Kross, E. (2020). Social comparison on social networking sites. Current Opinion in Psychology, 36, 32–37.                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.04.002                                ")), and increased loneliness (Marttila et al., [2021](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR58 "Marttila, E., Koivula, A., & Räsänen, P. (2021). Does excessive social media use decrease subjective well-being? A longitudinal analysis of the relationship between problematic use, loneliness and life satisfaction. Telematics and Informatics, 59, 101556.                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101556                                ")). Although SMU may initially gratify the needs of users (e.g., through entertainment) as the Uses and Gratifications Theory (UGT) suggests, this reliance on SM for gratification may eventually become problematic (Falgoust et al., [2022](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR29 "Falgoust, G., Winterlind, E., Moon, P., Parker, A., Zinzow, H., & Madathil, K. C. (2022). Applying the uses and gratifications theory to identify motivational factors behind young adult’s participation in viral social media challenges on TikTok. Human Factors in Healthcare, 2, 100014.                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hfh.2022.100014                                "); Ferris, Hollenbaugh & Sommer, [2021](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR30 "Ferris, A. L., Hollenbaugh, E. E., & Sommer, P. A. (2021). Applying the uses and gratifications model to examine consequences of social media addiction. Social Media + Society, 7(2).                  https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211019003                                ")).

Reliance on SM is further exacerbated by the emotional value placed on these sites (Lowe-Calverley et al., [2019](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR55 "Lowe-Calverley, E., Grieve, R., & Padgett, C. (2019). A risky investment? Examining the outcomes of emotional investment in Instagram. Telematics and Informatics, 45, 101299.                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.101299                                "); Martinez-Pecino & Garcia-Gavilan, [2019](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR57 "Martinez-Pecino, R., & Garcia-Gavilán, M. (2019). Likes and problematic instagram use: The moderating role of self-esteem. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 22(6), 412–416.                  https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2018.0701                                ")). Emotional investment (EI), in this study, describes the importance attributed to SM metrics such as “likes” and “followers”. These metrics can indicate social acceptance, and some users engage deceptively to attain desired approval (Dumas et al., [2017](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR26 "Dumas, T. M., Maxwell-Smith, M., Davis, J. P., & Giulietti, P. A. (2017). Lying or longing for likes? Narcissism, peer belonging, loneliness and normative versus deceptive like-seeking on Instagram in emerging adulthood. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 1–10.                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.037                                ")). EI has also been linked to reduced well-being through perceived social isolation and rejection (Chua & Chang, [2016](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR21 "Chua, T. H. H., & Chang, L. (2016). Follow me and like my beautiful selfies: Singapore teenage girls’ engagement in self-presentation and peer comparison on social media. Computers in Human Behavior, 55(A), 190–197."); Stokes & Price, [2017](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR94 "Stokes, J., & Price, B. (2017). Social media, visual culture and contemporary identity. In 11th International Multi-conference on society, cybernetics and informatics. IMSCI:                  https://www.iiis.org/CDs2017/CD2017Summer/papers/EA876TF.pdf                                ")). Examining EI provides an additional layer of detail about users’ experiences, allowing for a deeper understanding of how SMU impacts well-being.

Much of the current literature has focused on (problematic) Facebook use as a predictor of well-being (e.g., Astatke et al., [2022](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR8 "Astatke, M., Weng, C., & Chen, H. (2022). Does Facebook use influence users’ psychological well-being (PWB)? A literature review on trends and psychological well-being effects of Facebook use. Universal Access in the Information Society.                  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-022-00938-z                                ")). Few studies have given attention to other platforms, despite evidence that behavioural patterns and well-being outcomes differ between applications (Limniou et al., [2022](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR53 "Limniou, M., Ascroft, Y., & McLean, S. (2022). Differences between Facebook and Instagram usage in regard to problematic use and well-being. Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science, 7, 141–150.                  https://doi.org/10.1007/s41347-021-00229-z                                "); Smith & Short, [2022](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR86 "Smith, T., & Short, A. (2022). Needs affordance as a key factor in likelihood of problematic social media use: Validation, latent profile analysis and comparison of TikTok and Facebook problematic use measures. Addictive Behaviors, 129(107259), 107259.                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107259                                ")). Hou and Shiau ( [2019](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR38 "Hou, A. C. Y., & Shiau, W. L. (2019). Understanding Facebook to Instagram migration: a push-pull migration model perspective. Information Technology & People (ahead-of-print).                  https://doi.org/10.1108/itp-06-2017-0198                                ")) suggested users were moving away from Facebook to platforms with a high degree of visual content. Instagram and TikTok are both visually orientated platforms (Hellemans et al., [2021](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR37 "Hellemans, J., Willems, K., & Brengman, M. (2021). The new adult on the block: Daily active users of TikTok compared to Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram during the COVID-19 crisis in Belgium. In Digital marketing & eCommerce conference (pp. 95–103). Cham: Springer International Publishing.                  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76520-0_10                                "); Laor, [2022](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR48 "Laor, T. (2022). My social network: Group differences in frequency of use, active use, and interactive use on Facebook. Instagram and Twitter. Technology in Society, 68, 101922.                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101922                                ")), and users share similar motives for use across both (e.g., social interaction, self-presentation, escapism) (Lee et al., [2015](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR51 "Lee, E., Lee, J.-A., Moon, J. H., & Sung, Y. (2015). Pictures speak louder than words: Motivations for using Instagram. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(9), 552–556.                  https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2015.0157                                "); Omar & Dequan, [2020](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR69 "Omar, B., & Dequan, W. (2020). Watch, share or create: The influence of personality traits and user motivation on TikTok mobile video usage. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (IJIM), 14(04), 121–137.                  https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i04.12429                                ")).

More specifically, Instagram is a photo-sharing platform allowing users to share their lives through photos and videos (Lowe-Calverley et al., [2019](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR55 "Lowe-Calverley, E., Grieve, R., & Padgett, C. (2019). A risky investment? Examining the outcomes of emotional investment in Instagram. Telematics and Informatics, 45, 101299.                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.101299                                ")). This platform has over 2 billion monthly active users (Ruby, [2022](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR80 "Ruby, D. (2022). 71+ Instagram statistics 2022 [The revamped list]. Demandsage.                  https://www.demandsage.com/instagram-statistics/#:~:text=Instagram%20Monthly%20Active%20Users%20(MAUs                                ")), and research suggests users have an overwhelming preference for Instagram compared to Facebook (Shane-Simpson et al., [2018](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR84 "Shane-Simpson, C., Manago, A., Gaggi, N., & Gillespie-Lynch, K. (2018). Why do college students prefer Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram? Site affordances, tensions between privacy and self-expression, and implications for social capital. Computers in Human Behavior, 86, 276–288.                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.041                                ")). Instagram’s popularity is largely based on users’ immediate and direct access to friends and other followers (Hou & Shiau, [2019](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR38 "Hou, A. C. Y., & Shiau, W. L. (2019). Understanding Facebook to Instagram migration: a push-pull migration model perspective. Information Technology & People (ahead-of-print).                  https://doi.org/10.1108/itp-06-2017-0198                                ")). The images on this platform facilitate physical presence and have been suggested to reduce loneliness and contribute to positive mental well-being (Meier et al., [2020](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR61 "Meier, A., Gilbert, A., Börner, S., & Possler, D. (2020). Instagram inspiration: How upward comparison on social network sites can contribute to well-being. Journal of Communication, 70(5), 721–743.                  https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaa025                                "); Pittman & Reich, [2016](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR73 "Pittman, M., & Reich, B. (2016). Social media and loneliness: Why an Instagram picture may be worth more than a thousand Twitter words. Computers in Human Behavior, 62(62), 155–167.                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.084                                ")). In line with the Sociometer Theory (Leary, [2005](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR50 "Leary, M. R. (2005). Sociometer theory and the pursuit of relational value: Getting to the root of self-esteem. European Review of Social Psychology, 16(1), 75–111.                  https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280540000007                                ")), the posting of curated images on Instagram may enhance well-being if received positively by peers through “likes” and gaining “followers” (Stokes & Prices, [2017](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR94 "Stokes, J., & Price, B. (2017). Social media, visual culture and contemporary identity. In 11th International Multi-conference on society, cybernetics and informatics. IMSCI:                  https://www.iiis.org/CDs2017/CD2017Summer/papers/EA876TF.pdf                                ")). However, in attempting to post content that appeals to others, the risk of problematic engagement and decreased well-being arises (Diefenbach & Anders, [2021](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR24 "Diefenbach, S., & Anders, L. (2021). The psychology of likes: Relevance of feedback on Instagram and relationship to self-esteem and social status. Psychology of Popular Media, 11(2), 196–207.                  https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000360                                "); Dumas et al., [2017](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR26 "Dumas, T. M., Maxwell-Smith, M., Davis, J. P., & Giulietti, P. A. (2017). Lying or longing for likes? Narcissism, peer belonging, loneliness and normative versus deceptive like-seeking on Instagram in emerging adulthood. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 1–10.                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.037                                ")). Users may engage in exaggerated self-presentation (e.g., through filters and editing) which is associated with lower self-esteem (Ozimek et al., [2023](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR71 "Ozimek, P., Lainas, S., Bierhoff, H.-W., & Rohmann, E. (2023). How photo editing in social media shapes self-perceived attractiveness and self-esteem via self-objectification and physical appearance comparisons. BMC Psychology, 11(1).                  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01143-0                                ")). Additionally, evidence suggests viewing large quantities of “followers” curated photos can lead to negative emotions due to social comparison (Meier et al., [2020](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR61 "Meier, A., Gilbert, A., Börner, S., & Possler, D. (2020). Instagram inspiration: How upward comparison on social network sites can contribute to well-being. Journal of Communication, 70(5), 721–743.                  https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaa025                                ")).

TikTok, on the other hand, is a video-sharing platform that allows users to create short-form videos that can be shared with anyone through the “For You Page” (FYP) and it was the most downloaded mobile application worldwide in 2022 (Statista, [2022b](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR89 "Statista. (2022b). Top mobile apps worldwide by downloads 2021. Statista.                  https://www.statista.com/statistics/1285960/top-downloaded-mobile-apps-worldwide/                                ")). The popularity of TikTok is driven by the highly personalised and never-ending content available on the FYP (Zhao & Wagner, [2022](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR108 "Zhao, H., & Wagner, C. (2022). How TikTok leads users to flow experience: Investigating the effects of technology affordances with user experience level and video length as moderators. Internet Research.                  https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-08-2021-0595                                ")). The interface of TikTok has created a unique user experience that drives retention rates much higher than those on any other platform (Zhao & Wagner, [2022](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR108 "Zhao, H., & Wagner, C. (2022). How TikTok leads users to flow experience: Investigating the effects of technology affordances with user experience level and video length as moderators. Internet Research.                  https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-08-2021-0595                                ")). These high retention rates raise concerns as to what this means for user well-being, especially as many TikTok users report losing track of time and spending longer than intended online (Roberts & David, [2023](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR77 "Roberts, J. A., & David, M. E. (2023). Instagram and TikTok flow states and their association with psychological well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 26(2), 80–89.                  https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2022.0117                                ")). These experiences are consistent with the concept of “flow” in which users are so engrossed in scrolling that little else seems to matter to them (Brailovskaia et al., [2021](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR14 "Brailovskaia, J., Truskauskaite-Kuneviciene, I., Kazlauskas, E., & Margraf, J. (2021). The patterns of problematic social media use (SMU) and their relationship with online flow, life satisfaction, depression, anxiety and stress symptoms in Lithuania and in Germany. Current Psychology.                  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01711-w                                ")). This immersion is related to PSMU (Roberts & David, [2023](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR77 "Roberts, J. A., & David, M. E. (2023). Instagram and TikTok flow states and their association with psychological well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 26(2), 80–89.                  https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2022.0117                                ")), and there is concern that SM users who experience flow states more frequently will neglect offline activities upon which well-being depends (Brailovskaia et al., [2021](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR14 "Brailovskaia, J., Truskauskaite-Kuneviciene, I., Kazlauskas, E., & Margraf, J. (2021). The patterns of problematic social media use (SMU) and their relationship with online flow, life satisfaction, depression, anxiety and stress symptoms in Lithuania and in Germany. Current Psychology.                  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01711-w                                ")). As TikTok was recently launched, little research exists concerning the influence of TikTok on well-being (Montag et al., [2021](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR63 "Montag, C., Yang, H., & Elhai, J. D. (2021). On the psychology of TikTok use: A first glimpse from empirical findings. Frontiers in Public Health.                  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.641673                                ")). Some evidence implicates TikTok use with negative well-being (Dong & Xie, [2022](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR25 "Dong, Z., & Xie, T. (2022). Why people love short-form videos? The motivations for using Tiktok and implications for well-being. SSRN Electronic Journal.                  https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4089602                                "); Sha & Dong, [2021](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR83 "Sha, P., & Dong, X. (2021). Research on adolescents regarding the indirect effect of depression, anxiety, and stress between TikTok use disorder and memory loss. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(16), 8820.                  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168820                                ")), although results are conflicting (Masciantonio et al., [2021](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR59 "Masciantonio, A., Bourguignon, D., Bouchat, P., Balty, M., & Rimé, B. (2021). Don’t put all social network sites in one basket: Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, TikTok, and their relations with well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS ONE, 16(3), e0248384.                  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248384                                ")). As research regarding this platform is limited, further investigation into the relationship between TikTok use and mental well-being is needed.

The current study aims to provide further evidence regarding the relationship between (problematic) Instagram and TikTok use and mental well-being, specifically self-esteem, depression, and loneliness, also considering the role of EI. Based on statistical evidence, TikTok is more popular among young users (18–24-year-olds) compared to Instagram (Jian, [2023](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR42 "Jian, C. (2023). TikTok vs Instagram influencers. Social cat blog | get better at influencer marketing.                  https://thesocialcat.com/post/tiktok-vs-instagram-influencers                                ")). This may have an impact on people’s well-being as TikTok users mainly use this platform for “enjoyment” and “time distortion” purposes (Roberts & David, [2023](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR77 "Roberts, J. A., & David, M. E. (2023). Instagram and TikTok flow states and their association with psychological well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 26(2), 80–89.                  https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2022.0117                                ")). The authors are not aware of any other research that examines the impact of TikTok and Instagram on young users’ well-being, and so, this study will investigate the following hypotheses:

- H1. Greater TikTok Use (time spent per day) will be associated with greater problematic engagement, increased depressive symptoms, increased loneliness, and reduced self-esteem.

- H2. Greater Instagram Use (time spent per day) will be associated with greater problematic engagement, increased depressive symptoms, increased loneliness, and reduced self-esteem.

- H3. Greater PSMU scores will be associated with increased depressive symptoms, increased loneliness, and reduced self-esteem.

- H4. Greater EI (importance of “likes” and importance of “followers”) on TikTok will be associated with greater problematic engagement, increased depressive symptoms, increased loneliness, and reduced self-esteem.

- H5. Greater EI (importance of likes and importance of followers) on Instagram will be associated with greater problematic engagement, increased depressive symptoms, increased loneliness, and reduced self-esteem.


## Method

### Participants and Experimental Conditions

The recruitment process, based on opportunity sampling, started after gaining ethical approval from the University’s Ethics Committee. Study advertisements were posted on various social media platforms (i.e., Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter) and on an internal recruitment platform on which first-year students volunteer themselves as participants in undergraduate and postgraduate research. Participants were initially directed to the hosting website Qualtrics ( [www.qualtrics.com](http://www.qualtrics.com)) where participants could find the information sheet and the consent form. The participants were informed of the aim of the study and the data storage process. Participation was anonymous, and participants could withdraw at any time. All participants met the inclusion criteria (i.e., being 18 years of age or above, having no prior diagnoses of depression, and having a social media account on both platforms of Instagram and TikTok). After providing consent, participants could continue to the online survey. At the end of the study, participants were given a debrief sheet that contained contact information for any subsequent questions, and links to mental well-being web pages for further support if needed.

Overall, 252 participants fully completed the study (mean age = 19.93, SD = 4.70). Based on the power calculation, the margin error of the 252 participants who completed the questionnaire was ± 6.14% for a total population of 20,000 social media users with a 95% confidence level. As there was a requirement for participants to have an account on both Instagram and TikTok, at the beginning of the questionnaire, they were asked on which of the two social media sites they spent more than 75% of their time. A total of 80.9% of participants mostly used TikTok rather than Instagram, and most participants were females (86.1%).

### Questionnaire

An online questionnaire, including 69 questions and expected to take 20 min to complete, was used for this study. The initial part of the questionnaire included 12 items collecting demographic information (gender and age), social media usage (time spent on each platform, numbers of “likes” and “followers”, and the importance of these). The next part of the questionnaire included validated scales to measure participants’ self-esteem, depression, loneliness, and problematic social media use.

Specifically, the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (Rosenberg, [1965a](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR78 "Rosenberg, M. (1965a). Rosenberg self-esteem scale (RSE). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. Measures Package, 61(52), 18."), [b](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR79 "Rosenberg, M. (1965b). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton University Press.")) includes 10 items and is the most widely used measure of self-esteem for adult populations. Items are ranked on a 4-point Likert scale, with values ranging from 1 (strongly agree) to 4 (strongly disagree). Five items contain positively worded questions about the self (e.g., I feel I have a number of good qualities). The remaining five items contain negatively worded questions about the self (e.g., All in all, I am inclined to think I am a failure). Total scores can range between 10 and 40, whereby higher scores are indicative of lower self-esteem. The Cronbach’s alpha of self-esteem for this study was 0.88.

The 20-item University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Loneliness Scale was used to measure subjective feelings of loneliness (Russell et al., [1978](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR81 "Russell, D., Peplau, L. A., & Ferguson, M. L. (1978). Developing a measure of loneliness. Journal of Personality Assessment, 42(3), 290–294.                  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4203_11                                ")). Items are ranked on a 4-point Likert scale, with values ranging from 1 (never) to 4 (often). There are positively worded items, reflecting satisfaction with social relationships, (e.g., I feel part of a group of friends) as well as negatively worded items, suggesting dissatisfaction with these relationships (e.g., I feel left out). The scores can range between 20 and 80, with higher scores indicating greater subjective feelings of loneliness. The Cronbach’s alpha of loneliness for this study was 0.89.

The next 20 items on the questionnaire measured depressive symptoms experienced over the last week, and the Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D; Radloff, [1977](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR74 "Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(3), 385–401.                  https://doi.org/10.1177/014662167700100306                                ")) was used. Items are ranked on a 4-point Likert scale, with values ranging from 1 (rarely or none of the time (less than once a day)) to 4 (most or all of the time (5–7 days)). This scale contains items related to depression (e.g., restlessness and poor appetite). There are four positively worded items (e.g., I enjoyed life) and 16 negatively worded items (e.g., I had crying spells). The scores can range between 20 and 80, with higher scores being indicative of greater depressive symptoms being experienced over the last week. The Cronbach’s alpha of depression for this study was 0.92.

The final part of the online questionnaire included the Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale (BSMAS; Andreassen et al., [2017](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR5 "Andreassen, C. S., Pallesen, S., & Griffiths, M. D. (2017). The relationship between addictive use of social media, narcissism, and self-esteem: Findings from a large national survey. Addictive Behaviors, 64(64), 287–293.                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.03.006                                ")) which measured problematic social media use. This scale assessed social media use over the past 12 months. This 6-item questionnaire is anchored in general addiction theory according to six basic symptoms of addiction (salience, conflict, mood modification, withdrawal, tolerance, and relapse) (Griffiths, [2005](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR33 "Griffiths, M. (2005). A “components” model of addiction within a biopsychosocial framework. Journal of Substance Use, 10(4), 191–197.                  https://doi.org/10.1080/14659890500114359                                ")). All items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale, with values ranging from 1 (very rarely) to 5 (very often). Total scores can range between 6 and 30, with higher scores indicating greater addiction symptoms. The Cronbach’s alpha of problematic use for this study was 0.79.

### Results

An overview of the participant’s well-being and PSMU is given in Table [1](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#Tab1). Information regarding time spent on each platform is provided in Table [2](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#Tab2).

**Table 1 Descriptives of participants’ well-being and problematic social media use**

[Full size table](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6/tables/1)

**Table 2 Descriptives of participants’ time spent in minutesa on each platform**

[Full size table](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6/tables/2)

### Hypothesis 1

To investigate the association between time spent on TikTok, PSMU, and well-being, four simple regression analyses were conducted.

There was a significant association between time spent on TikTok and problematic use (adjusted _R_ 2 = 0.08, _F_(1, 250) = 24.12, _β_ = 0.30, _p_ < 0.001), with those who spent longer on TikTok each day scoring higher on the problematic use scale. There was a significant association between time spent on TikTok and depression (adjusted _R_ 2 = 0.04, _F_(1, 250) = 10.71, _β_ = _0_.20, _p_ = 0.001), with longer time spent on TikTok predicting greater scores on the relevant CES-Depression scale. There was also a significant relationship between time spent on TikTok and self-esteem scores (adjusted _R_ 2 = 0.02, _F_(1, 250) = 6.46, _β_ = 0.16, _p_ = 0.012), with greater time spent on TikTok predicting higher self-esteem scores which indicate experiences of lower self-esteem.

There was no significant relationship between time spent on TikTok and loneliness scores ( _R_ 2 =  − 0.003, _F_(1, 250) = 0.36, _p_ = 0.551).

### Hypothesis 2

This hypothesis investigated the relationship between time spent on Instagram, problematic use (PSMU), and well-being. Four simple regression analyses were conducted.

Time spent on Instagram was significantly associated with PSMU (adjusted _R_ 2 = 0.03, _F_(1, 250) = 7.49, _β_ = 0.17, _p_ = 0.007), with greater time spent on Instagram each day predicting greater scores on the problematic use scale.

There was no significant association between time spent on Instagram and any well-being outcomes, including depression ( _R_ 2 =  − 0.004, _F_(1, 250) = 0.10, _p_ = 0.753), loneliness (adjusted _R_ 2 =  − 0.003, _F_(1, 250) = 0.34, _p_ = 0.563), and self-esteem (adjusted _R_ 2 = 0.007, _F_(1,250) = 2.84, _p_ = 0.093).

### Hypothesis 3

To investigate the association between problematic use (PSMU) and well-being outcomes, three linear regression analyses were conducted.

PSMU was significantly associated with both depression (adjusted _R_ 2 = 0.08, _F_(1,250) = 22.55, _β_ = 0.29, _p_ < 0.001) and self-esteem (adjusted _R_ 2 = 0.06, _F_(1, 250) = 16.05, _β_ = 0.25, _p_ < 0.001). Greater PSMU related to higher scores on scales measuring depression (i.e., more depressive symptoms experienced) and self-esteem (i.e., lower self-esteem). PSMU had no association with loneliness ( _R_ 2 =  − 0.001, _F_(1, 250) = 0.66, _p_ = 0.417).

### Hypothesis 4

Emotional investment (EI) and its association with problematic use (PSMU) and well-being were investigated. Table [3](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#Tab3) provides an overview of participants’ responses regarding EI across both platforms.

**Table 3 Participants’ response per social media platform on questions regarding the importance of “likes” and “followers” (4-point Likert scale; 1, extremely important to 4, not important at all)**

[Full size table](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6/tables/3)

To investigate the association between EI on TikTok and problematic use (PSMU) and well-being, four multiple regressions were conducted.

The regression model regarding PSMU was significant and predicted approximately 5% of the variance; adjusted _R_ 2 = 0.05, _F_(2, 201) = 6.51, _p_ = 0.002. There was a significant negative association between the importance of “likes” and PSMU ( _β_ =  − 0.27, _p_ < 0.001), with those regarding likes as more important scoring higher on the problematic use scale. However, no significant association was found between the importance of followers on TikTok and PSMU scores ( _p_ = 0.122).

The overall regression model regarding depression was not significant (adjusted _R_ 2 = 0.01, _F_(2, 201) = 2.16, _p_ = 0.118). However, there was a significant negative relationship between the importance of “likes” and depression ( _β_ =  − 0.15, _p_ = 0.045), with those regarding “likes” as more important experiencing more depressive symptoms. There was no significant relationship between the importance of “followers” and depression ( _p_ = 0.205).

The regression model investigating self-esteem was not significant (adjusted _R_ 2 = 0.003, _F_(2, 201) = 1.26, _p_ = 0.286. Neither the importance of “likes” ( _p_ = 0.158) nor the importance of “followers” ( _p_ = 0.930) were significant predictors of self-esteem.

Lastly, the regression model investigating loneliness was also non-significant (adjusted _R_ 2 = 0.01, _F_(2, 201) = 2.26, _p_ = 0.106. Neither the importance of likes ( _p_ = 0.056) nor the importance of “followers” on TikTok ( _p_ = 0.936) were significant predictors of loneliness.

### Hypothesis 5

Finally, the association between EI on Instagram and problematic use (PSMU) and well-being was investigated using four multiple regressions.

The regression model regarding PSMU was significant and predicted 8.6% of the variance; adjusted _R_ 2 = 0.09, _F_(2, 45) = 3.21, _p_ = 0.050. There was a significant negative association between the importance of “likes” and PSMU _(β_ =  − 0.40, _p_ = 0.028), with those regarding “likes” as more important scoring higher on the problematic use scale. However, no significant association was found between the importance of “followers” on TikTok and PSMU scores ( _β_ = 0.09, _p_ = 0.616).

The regression model investigating depression was not significant (adjusted _R_ 2 =  − 0.02, _F_(2, 45) = 0.62, _p_ = 0.542). Neither the importance of “likes” ( _p_ = 0.893) nor the importance of “followers” on Instagram ( _p_ = 0.435) predicted depression scores.

The regression model investigating self-esteem was also non-significant (adjusted _R_ 2 = 0.03, _F_(2, 45) = 1.80, _p_ = 0.178). Neither the importance of “likes” ( _p_ = 0.367) nor the importance of “followers” on Instagram ( _p_ = 0.460) predicted depression scores.

Finally, the regression model investigating loneliness was also non-significant adjusted ( _R_ 2 =  − 0.03, _F_(2, 45) = 0.38, _p_ = 0.686). There was no significant association between the importance of “likes” ( _p_ = 0.545) nor the importance of “followers” on Instagram ( _p_ = 0.391) and loneliness scores.

## Discussion

Social Media (SM) platforms are a ubiquitous presence in modern society, with users spending longer online each year (Statista, [2023a](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR90 "Statista. (2023a). Social media users worldwide 2019–2028.                  https://www-statista-com.liverpool.idm.oclc.org/forecasts/1146659/social-media-users-in-the-world                                ")). The popularity of these platforms has encouraged research into the association between Social Media Use (SMU) and well-being. Some evidence suggests that SMU encourages well-being through increased social opportunities (Burrow & Rainone, [2017](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR15 "Burrow, A. L., & Rainone, N. (2017). How many likes did I get?: Purpose moderates links between positive social media feedback and self-esteem. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 69(69), 232–236.                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.09.005                                ")) and the management of negative emotions (Wolfers & Schneider, [2021](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR104 "Wolfers, L. N., & Schneider, F. M. (2021). Using media for coping: A scoping review. Communication Research, 48(8), 1210–1234.                  https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650220939778                                ")). However, many studies provide evidence for the negative influence of SMU on well-being (e.g., Jan et al., [2017](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR41 "Jan, M., Soomro, S. A., & Ahmad, N. (2017). Impact of social media on self-esteem. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 13(23), 329–341.                  https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2017.v13n23p329                                "); Marttila et al., [2021](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR58 "Marttila, E., Koivula, A., & Räsänen, P. (2021). Does excessive social media use decrease subjective well-being? A longitudinal analysis of the relationship between problematic use, loneliness and life satisfaction. Telematics and Informatics, 59, 101556.                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101556                                ")), especially in those who engage problematically (Lopes et al., [2022](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR54 "Lopes, L. S., Valentini, J. P., Monteiro, T. H., Costacurta, M. C. de F., Soares, L. O. N., Telfar-Barnard, L., & Nunes, P. V. (2022). Problematic social media use and its relationship with depression or anxiety: A systematic review. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 25(11), 691–702.                  https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2021.0300                                ")). The current study set out to investigate the influence of Instagram and TikTok use on well-being, also considering the influence of PSMU and EI. It was expected that a greater understanding of the relationship between SMU and well-being would be established, particularly as few studies have investigated Instagram and TikTok use.

The first hypothesis suggested greater time spent on TikTok per day would predict greater scores of PSMU, depression, loneliness, and self-esteem. This hypothesis was partially supported as time spent on TikTok did positively predict scores of PSMU, depression, and self-esteem, however, did not predict a significant association with loneliness. The significant results are consistent with existing literature suggesting a relationship between SMU and reduced well-being (Cunningham et al., [2021](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR22 "Cunningham, S., Hudson, C. C., & Harkness, K. (2021). Social media and depression symptoms: A meta-analysis. Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, 49(2), 241–253.                  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-020-00715-7                                ")) and further provide support for studies demonstrating TikTok use, specifically, to impact well-being (Sha & Dong, [2021](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR83 "Sha, P., & Dong, X. (2021). Research on adolescents regarding the indirect effect of depression, anxiety, and stress between TikTok use disorder and memory loss. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(16), 8820.                  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168820                                ")). These findings may be explained through experiences of “time distortion” (losing track of time) and “telepresence” (deep immersion) that previous studies have shown are common in TikTok users (Roberts & David, [2023](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR77 "Roberts, J. A., & David, M. E. (2023). Instagram and TikTok flow states and their association with psychological well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 26(2), 80–89.                  https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2022.0117                                ")). Brailovskaia and colleagues ( [2020](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR13 "Brailovskaia, J., & Margraf, J. (2020). Relationship between depression symptoms, physical activity, and addictive social media use. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 23(12), 818–822.                  https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2020.0255                                ")) concluded these experiences to be strongly related to PSMU as users find “flow states” rewarding and feel anxious when they are unable to immerse themselves within these platforms. Furthermore, in line with the Displacement Theory (Gruner, [2016](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR34 "Gruner, D. T. (2016). New digital media and flow: A study of experience Creativity. Theories - Research - Applications, 3(2), 343–362.                  https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2016-0021                                ")), spending longer time on TikTok reduces the time available to complete important tasks (e.g., academic work) (Lau, [2017](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR49 "Lau, W. W. F. (2017). Effects of social media usage and social media multitasking on the academic performance of university students. Computers in Human Behavior, 68(68), 286–291.                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.043                                ")) which in turn predicts depression (DeRoma et al., [2009](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR23 "DeRoma, V., Leach, J. P., & Patrick Leverett, J. (2009). The relationship between depression and college academic performance. College Student Journal, 43(2), 325–334.")) and self-esteem (Arshad et al., [2015](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR7 "Arshad, M., Zaidi, S. M. I. H., & Mahmood, K. (2015). Self-esteem & academic performance among university students. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(1), 156–162.")). These are important findings concerning the current population of predominately university students.

Unexpectedly, time spent on TikTok was not associated with scores of loneliness. This contrasts existing literature about loneliness as presented in the “ [Introduction](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#Sec1)” Section. Additionally, these results are surprising given that UK university students often report experiences of loneliness (Vasileiou et al., [2019](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR99 "Vasileiou, K., Barnett, J., Barreto, M., Vines, J., Atkinson, M., Long, K., & Wilson, M. (2019). Coping with loneliness at university: A qualitative interview study with students in the UK. Mental Health & Prevention, 13, 21–30.                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mhp.2018.11.002                                ")), and so, it is unexpected to see no relationship between SMU and loneliness in the current sample. The lack of significance may lie in the unidimensional measure of loneliness used in this study. Past studies that have shown significant associations have examined loneliness in its two components—social and emotional, and shown these to differ in their relationship with SMU (Bonsaksen et al., [2021](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR11 "Bonsaksen, T., Ruffolo, M., Leung, J., Price, D., Thygesen, H., Schoultz, M., & Geirdal, A. Ø. (2021). Loneliness and its association with social media use during the COVID-19 outbreak. Social Media + Society, 7(3), 205630512110338.                  https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211033821                                ")). Perhaps, it is that social loneliness is reduced through SMU due to access to a huge audience, but emotional loneliness is enhanced through a lack of intimate connection with this audience. As the current study only investigated unidimensional loneliness scores, a more nuanced understanding of the relationship between SMU and loneliness could not be provided.

Secondly, this study investigated the association between time spent on Instagram and levels of PSMU, depression, loneliness, and self-esteem. Time spent on Instagram was only significantly associated with PSMU. Some past research has suggested there to be no relationship between time spent on SM platforms and well-being (Banjanin et al., [2015](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR9 "Banjanin, N., Banjanin, N., Dimitrijevic, I., & Pantic, I. (2015). Relationship between internet use and depression: Focus on physiological mood oscillations, social networking and online addictive behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 43, 308–312.                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.013                                "); Stapleton et al., [2017](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR87 "Stapleton, P., Luiz, G., & Chatwin, H. (2017). Generation validation: The role of social comparison in use of Instagram among emerging adults. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 20(3), 142–149.                  https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.0444                                ")). These findings, together with the present study, suggest there exist factors in addition to duration that influence the relationship between Instagram use and well-being. For example, passive browsing vs active commenting has been related to reduced well-being (Frison & Eggermont, [2017](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR31 "Frison, E., & Eggermont, S. (2017). Browsing, posting, and liking on Instagram: The reciprocal relationships between different types of instagram use and adolescents’ depressed mood. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 20(10), 603–609.                  https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2017.0156                                ")). As this study did not investigate how people use SMU, this may explain the lack of significant findings here.

Across both platforms, time spent was associated with PSMU. This is in line with previous research (Lopes et al., [2022](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR54 "Lopes, L. S., Valentini, J. P., Monteiro, T. H., Costacurta, M. C. de F., Soares, L. O. N., Telfar-Barnard, L., & Nunes, P. V. (2022). Problematic social media use and its relationship with depression or anxiety: A systematic review. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 25(11), 691–702.                  https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2021.0300                                ")). Following UGT suggestions (Katz et al., [1973](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR45 "Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509–523.                  https://doi.org/10.1086/268109                                ")), users learn that SMU can easily and conveniently provide gratification for their needs (e.g., through entertainment), and so, users rely increasingly on SM to satisfy these (Kircaburun et al., [2020](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR46 "Kircaburun, K., Alhabash, S., Tosuntaş, ŞB., & Griffiths, M. D. (2020). Uses and gratifications of problematic social media use among university students: A simultaneous examination of the big five of personality traits, social media platforms, and social media use motives. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 18, 525–547.                  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-018-9940-6                                ")). However, SMU may not satisfy needs wholly (e.g., online social interactions are not as fulfilling as those that occur offline), and ungratified needs accumulate over time and drive subsequent SMU ( Hussain & Shabir, [2020](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR39 "Hussain, A., & Shabir, G. (2020). Cognitive needs and use of social media: A comparative study of gratifications sought and gratification obtained. Information Discovery and Delivery, 48(2), 79–90.                  https://doi.org/10.1108/IDD-11-2019-0081                                ")).

Additionally, PSMU was significantly associated with depression and self-esteem, but not loneliness. Addictive behaviours may disrupt other activities that can be protective against negative well-being (e.g., exercise and/or sleep) (Brailovskaia & Margraf, [2020](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR13 "Brailovskaia, J., & Margraf, J. (2020). Relationship between depression symptoms, physical activity, and addictive social media use. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 23(12), 818–822.                  https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2020.0255                                ")). In university students, these healthy behaviours are often already disrupted (e.g., Jiang et al., [2015](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR44 "Jiang, X., Zheng, X., Yang, J., Ye, C., Chen, Y., Zhang, Z., & Xiao, Z. (2015). A systematic review of studies on the prevalence of Insomnia in university students. Public Health, 129(12), 1579–1584.                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2015.07.030                                ")), and so, PSMU creates an added layer of risk in this population. Negative patterns of use (e.g., obsessive self-comparison) that are linked to reduced self-esteem and increased depressive symptoms are exacerbated in those exhibiting PSMU (Banjanin et al., [2015](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR9 "Banjanin, N., Banjanin, N., Dimitrijevic, I., & Pantic, I. (2015). Relationship between internet use and depression: Focus on physiological mood oscillations, social networking and online addictive behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 43, 308–312.                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.013                                ")). These results demonstrate that PSMU is independently associated with depression and self-esteem, regardless of time, suggesting it may be how users are engaging, rather than the duration of engagement, that poses a risk to well-being (Lopes et al., [2022](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR54 "Lopes, L. S., Valentini, J. P., Monteiro, T. H., Costacurta, M. C. de F., Soares, L. O. N., Telfar-Barnard, L., & Nunes, P. V. (2022). Problematic social media use and its relationship with depression or anxiety: A systematic review. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 25(11), 691–702.                  https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2021.0300                                ")).

Unexpectedly, PSMU was not associated with loneliness. Throughout the literature, there are inconsistencies in findings relating to the relationship between PSMU and loneliness (Limniou et al., [2022](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR53 "Limniou, M., Ascroft, Y., & McLean, S. (2022). Differences between Facebook and Instagram usage in regard to problematic use and well-being. Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science, 7, 141–150.                  https://doi.org/10.1007/s41347-021-00229-z                                "); Lutz & Schneider, [2020](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR56 "Lutz, S., & Schneider, F. M. (2020). Is receiving dislikes in social media still better than being ignored? The effects of ostracism and rejection on need threat and coping responses online. Media Psychology, 24(6), 741–765.                  https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2020.1799409                                ");). It has been suggested that differences across studies may lie in the way that users are engaging with SM (O’Day & Heimberg, [2021](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR68 "O’Day, E. B., & Heimberg, R. G. (2021). Social media use, social anxiety, and loneliness: A systematic review. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 3(100070), 100070.                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100070                                "); Verduyn et al., [2017](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR101 "Verduyn, P., Ybarra, O., Résibois, M., Jonides, J., & Kross, E. (2017). Do Social network sites enhance or undermine subjective well-being? A critical review. Social Issues and Policy Review, 11(1), 274–302.                  https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12033                                ")). Active users, engaging in direct messaging, posting, and sharing, often report reduced feelings of loneliness (Verduyn et al., [2017](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR101 "Verduyn, P., Ybarra, O., Résibois, M., Jonides, J., & Kross, E. (2017). Do Social network sites enhance or undermine subjective well-being? A critical review. Social Issues and Policy Review, 11(1), 274–302.                  https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12033                                ")). On the other hand, passive use, monitoring other people’s lives without direct engagement, is associated with increased feelings of loneliness (Moody, [2004](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR64 "Moody, E. J. (2004). Internet use and its relationship to loneliness. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 4(3), 393–401.                  https://doi.org/10.1089/109493101300210303                                "); Verduyn et al., [2017](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR101 "Verduyn, P., Ybarra, O., Résibois, M., Jonides, J., & Kross, E. (2017). Do Social network sites enhance or undermine subjective well-being? A critical review. Social Issues and Policy Review, 11(1), 274–302.                  https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12033                                ")). As the current study did not investigate active or passive SMU, this may explain why no association was found.

The final two hypotheses investigated the influence of EI on PSMU and well-being. “likes” and “followers” constitute evidence of social inclusion and acceptance (Burrow & Rainone, [2017](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR15 "Burrow, A. L., & Rainone, N. (2017). How many likes did I get?: Purpose moderates links between positive social media feedback and self-esteem. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 69(69), 232–236.                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.09.005                                "); Chua & Chang, [2016](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR21 "Chua, T. H. H., & Chang, L. (2016). Follow me and like my beautiful selfies: Singapore teenage girls’ engagement in self-presentation and peer comparison on social media. Computers in Human Behavior, 55(A), 190–197.")), and some users may take extreme measures to ensure positive online feedback (Dumas et al., [2017](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR26 "Dumas, T. M., Maxwell-Smith, M., Davis, J. P., & Giulietti, P. A. (2017). Lying or longing for likes? Narcissism, peer belonging, loneliness and normative versus deceptive like-seeking on Instagram in emerging adulthood. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 1–10.                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.037                                ")). Across both platforms, the importance of “likes” significantly predicted PSMU scores, as was expected from Sociometer theory, with individuals’ self-esteem being affected by the sense of social acceptance and the importance placed on their relationships (Zhang et al., [2023](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR107 "Zhang, C. A., Tang, L., & Liu, Z. (2023). How social media usage affects psychological and subjective well-being: Testing a moderated mediation model. BMC Psychology, 11(1), 286.                  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01311-2                                ")). This is in line with past research that demonstrates a relationship between those seeking validation and “addictive” SMU (Limniou et al., [2022](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR53 "Limniou, M., Ascroft, Y., & McLean, S. (2022). Differences between Facebook and Instagram usage in regard to problematic use and well-being. Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science, 7, 141–150.                  https://doi.org/10.1007/s41347-021-00229-z                                ")). One key factor associated with excessive behaviours is the reward, as previous research has shown the rewarding power of “likes” (Martinez-Pecino & Garcia-Gavilan, [2019](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR57 "Martinez-Pecino, R., & Garcia-Gavilán, M. (2019). Likes and problematic instagram use: The moderating role of self-esteem. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 22(6), 412–416.                  https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2018.0701                                ")), including at a neural level (Sherman et al., [2018](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR85 "Sherman, L. E., Hernandez, L. M., Greenfield, P. M., & Dapretto, M. (2018). What the brain “likes”: Neural correlates of providing feedback on social media. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 13(7), 699–707.                  https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsy051                                ")). “Likes” can indicate social acceptance and approval and, for those who are more sensitive to measures of these, encourage excessive and problematic engagement as they rely increasingly on SM to meet needs (Kircaburun et al., [2020](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR46 "Kircaburun, K., Alhabash, S., Tosuntaş, ŞB., & Griffiths, M. D. (2020). Uses and gratifications of problematic social media use among university students: A simultaneous examination of the big five of personality traits, social media platforms, and social media use motives. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 18, 525–547.                  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-018-9940-6                                "); Li et al., [2018](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR52 "Li, P., Chang, L., Chua, T. H. H., & Loh, R. S. M. (2018). “Likes” as KPI: An examination of teenage girls’ perspective on peer feedback on Instagram and its influence on coping response. Telematics and Informatics, 35(7), 1994–2005.                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.07.003                                ")). Followers on these platforms do not provide rewards in the same manner as “likes”. Indeed, research has shown users engage more in deceptive “like-seeking” (Dumas et al., [2017](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR26 "Dumas, T. M., Maxwell-Smith, M., Davis, J. P., & Giulietti, P. A. (2017). Lying or longing for likes? Narcissism, peer belonging, loneliness and normative versus deceptive like-seeking on Instagram in emerging adulthood. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 1–10.                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.037                                ")) as this metric carries more value in online spaces.

The importance of “likes” for those who prefer TikTok was significantly associated with depression. TikTok users often create videos to increase confidence and entertain others (Falgoust et al., [2022](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR29 "Falgoust, G., Winterlind, E., Moon, P., Parker, A., Zinzow, H., & Madathil, K. C. (2022). Applying the uses and gratifications theory to identify motivational factors behind young adult’s participation in viral social media challenges on TikTok. Human Factors in Healthcare, 2, 100014.                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hfh.2022.100014                                ")). Other studies have shown users feel disheartened when they do not receive the recognition they believe they deserve (Chua & Chang, [2016](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR21 "Chua, T. H. H., & Chang, L. (2016). Follow me and like my beautiful selfies: Singapore teenage girls’ engagement in self-presentation and peer comparison on social media. Computers in Human Behavior, 55(A), 190–197.")). In line with the Need-Threat model (NTM), the results of the current study suggest that TikTok users who are more sensitive to peer acceptance/rejection through “likes” may suffer reduced well-being when their need for validation is not met. Insufficient validation may trigger negative thoughts (e.g., viewing oneself as less likeable) which are known risk factors for depression (Ali et al., [2023](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR3 "Ali, F., Tauni, M. Z., Ashfaq, M., Zhang, Q., & Ahsan, T. (2023). Depressive mood and compulsive social media usage: The mediating roles of contingent self-esteem and social interaction fears. Information Technology & People.                  https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-01-2021-0057                                ")).

Contrastingly, the importance of “likes” for those who prefer TikTok did not significantly predict self-esteem or loneliness. The importance of TikTok “followers” was also not significantly related to any well-being variables. Although these findings are somewhat contrasting to existing literature regarding other SM platforms (Li et al., [2018](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR52 "Li, P., Chang, L., Chua, T. H. H., & Loh, R. S. M. (2018). “Likes” as KPI: An examination of teenage girls’ perspective on peer feedback on Instagram and its influence on coping response. Telematics and Informatics, 35(7), 1994–2005.                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.07.003                                ")), they do align with some preliminary studies on TikTok use. Indeed, some evidence shows that TikTok-use motivations are a significant factor in predicting well-being (Dong & Xie, [2022](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR25 "Dong, Z., & Xie, T. (2022). Why people love short-form videos? The motivations for using Tiktok and implications for well-being. SSRN Electronic Journal.                  https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4089602                                ")). As this study did not investigate SMU motives, this may explain the lack of significant findings. Examining the relationship between SMU motives and well-being could provide a deeper understanding of the influence TikTok use has on well-being.

EI on Instagram was not significantly related to any well-being outcomes. Although past studies contrast present findings (Martinez-Pecino & Garcia-Gavilan, [2019](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR57 "Martinez-Pecino, R., & Garcia-Gavilán, M. (2019). Likes and problematic instagram use: The moderating role of self-esteem. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 22(6), 412–416.                  https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2018.0701                                ")), these studies considered additional variables that the current study did not. For example, it has been suggested that the anticipation of posting is more closely related to well-being outcomes compared to the reception of this post (Lowe-Calverley et al., [2019](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR55 "Lowe-Calverley, E., Grieve, R., & Padgett, C. (2019). A risky investment? Examining the outcomes of emotional investment in Instagram. Telematics and Informatics, 45, 101299.                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.101299                                ")). As the current study only focused on investment in “likes” and “followers”, the failure to examine additional variables may account for the lack of significant findings. An additional point to note here is that Instagram recently introduced a feature in which users can “hide like count” (Instagram, [2021](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR40 "Instagram. (2021). Giving people more control on Instagram and Facebook.                  https://about.instagram.com/blog/announcements/giving-people-more-control                                ")). The reduced visibility of this metric has been shown to obscure significant relationships with well-being (Wallace & Buil, [2021](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR102 "Wallace, E., & Buil, I. (2021). Hiding Instagram likes: Effects on negative affect and loneliness. Personality and Individual Differences, 170, 110509.                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110509                                ")), as in the current study. Thus, as the current study did not control for the visibility of “likes” on Instagram, this may also have impacted the findings.

Whilst the current findings do provide useful evidence of the relationship between Instagram and TikTok use and well-being, there are some limitations. Firstly, this study employed a cross-sectional, correlational design, which hampers the ability to determine directional relationships. Some studies have suggested that those with reduced well-being engage more with SM to cope with these negative feelings (Rasmussen et al., [2020](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR75 "Rasmussen, E. E., Punyanunt-Carter, N., LaFreniere, J. R., Norman, M. S., & Kimball, T. G. (2020). The serially mediated relationship between emerging adults’ social media use and mental well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 206–213.                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.019                                ")), so, well-being may predict SMU. The directionality proposed in this study requires further research. Future studies would benefit from using longitudinal designs to better understand the direction and stability of these relationships. Secondly, self-report measures may have presented an issue, particularly regarding time spent online each day. Users likely underestimate their time spent online (“time distortion” effects) (Scharkow, [2016](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR82 "Scharkow, M. (2016). The accuracy of self-reported internet use—A validation study using client log data. Communication Methods and Measures, 10(1), 13–27.                  https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2015.1118446                                ")). The time frame associated with well-being and PSMU needs to be accurately measured to best advise interventions for those struggling. Future research could use active monitoring methods to track SMUs more accurately. Additionally, users may have felt embarrassed to attribute important values to “likes” and “followers” and so downplayed their true feelings for these questions. This may have influenced the significance of the present results. This study also assumed that the importance of “likes” would be consistent across both platforms; however, future research would benefit from investigating value attributed across the two platforms. Finally, the current sample is largely representative of the majority user base on both platforms (18–29 years old) with more females participating in this survey, while the gender ratio in both platforms is approximately equally split (Statista, [2023b](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR91 "Statista. (2023b). Instagram: Distribution of global audiences 2023, by age and gender.                  https://www.statista.com/statistics/248769/age-distribution-of-worldwide-instagram-users/                                "), [c](/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6#ref-CR92 "Statista. (2023c). TikTok: Distribution of global audiences 2023, by age and gender.                  https://www.statista.com/statistics/1299771/tiktok-global-user-age-distribution/                                ")). However, these findings should not be overgeneralised to other populations. Across most SM platforms, the minimum age for initial sign-up is 13; however, this study only considered those over 18. Thus, these findings may not be relevant to younger adolescents. Considering the importance of emotional development during adolescence, future research should investigate the age and gender demographic further.

From the current findings, several implications may be considered. Firstly, users should spend less time on social media platforms. This could entail using screen-time management settings or an accountability partner promoting healthier SMUs. The prior may improve self-regulation which helps an individual to practice restraint the next time they use SM. These practices may help mitigate the negative impact of time distortion and telepresence through disruption of flow states, thus reducing the risk of PSMU and reduced well-being. Additionally, the influence of PSMU on well-being is of interest to healthcare professionals. For example, it may be valuable to track SMUs in clinical populations to examine excessive patterns of use which may be contributing to mood dysregulation.

To conclude, this study has discussed how individuals’ well-being may be impacted by PSMU, EI, and time spent on SM each day. Participants engaged with TikTok more and showed a preference for this platform over Instagram. Increased use and EI across both platforms predicted PSMU, which in turn was associated with depression and self-esteem, but not loneliness. The findings of this study reinforce the complexity of the relationship between SMU and well-being and highlight the need for continued investigation in this area, particularly as SMU continues to impact daily life.

## Data Availability

The anonymised data collected are available as open data via the Zenodo online data repository ( [https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8159160Declarations](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8159160Declarations)).

## References

- Adeyanju, G. C., Solfa, R. P., Tran, T. L., et al. (2021). Behavioural symptoms of mental health disorder such as depression among young people using Instagram: A systematic review. _Transitional and Medicine Communication,_ _6_, 15\. [https://doi.org/10.1186/s41231-021-00092-3](https://doi.org/10.1186/s41231-021-00092-3)

[Article](https://link.springer.com/doi/10.1186/s41231-021-00092-3) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Behavioural%20symptoms%20of%20mental%20health%20disorder%20such%20as%20depression%20among%20young%20people%20using%20Instagram%3A%20A%20systematic%20review&journal=Transitional%20and%20Medicine%20Communication&doi=10.1186%2Fs41231-021-00092-3&volume=6&publication_year=2021&author=Adeyanju%2CGC&author=Solfa%2CRP&author=Tran%2CTL)

- Aichner, T., Grünfelder, M., Maurer, O., & Jegeni, D. (2021). Twenty-five years of social media: A review of social media applications and definitions from 1994 to 2019. _Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking,_ _24_(4), 215–222. [https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2020.0134](https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2020.0134)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1089%2Fcyber.2020.0134) [PubMed](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=33847527) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Twenty-five%20years%20of%20social%20media%3A%20A%20review%20of%20social%20media%20applications%20and%20definitions%20from%201994%20to%202019&journal=Cyberpsychology%2C%20Behavior%2C%20and%20Social%20Networking&doi=10.1089%2Fcyber.2020.0134&volume=24&issue=4&pages=215-222&publication_year=2021&author=Aichner%2CT&author=Gr%C3%BCnfelder%2CM&author=Maurer%2CO&author=Jegeni%2CD)

- Ali, F., Tauni, M. Z., Ashfaq, M., Zhang, Q., & Ahsan, T. (2023). Depressive mood and compulsive social media usage: The mediating roles of contingent self-esteem and social interaction fears. _Information Technology & People_. [https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-01-2021-0057](https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-01-2021-0057)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1108%2FITP-01-2021-0057) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Depressive%20mood%20and%20compulsive%20social%20media%20usage%3A%20The%20mediating%20roles%20of%20contingent%20self-esteem%20and%20social%20interaction%20fears&journal=Information%20Technology%20%26%20People&doi=10.1108%2FITP-01-2021-0057&publication_year=2023&author=Ali%2CF&author=Tauni%2CMZ&author=Ashfaq%2CM&author=Zhang%2CQ&author=Ahsan%2CT)

- Andreassen, C. S. (2015). Online social network site addiction: A comprehensive review. _Current Addiction Reports,_ _2_(2), 175–184. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-015-0056-9](https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-015-0056-9)

[Article](https://link.springer.com/doi/10.1007/s40429-015-0056-9) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Online%20social%20network%20site%20addiction%3A%20A%20comprehensive%20review&journal=Current%20Addiction%20Reports&doi=10.1007%2Fs40429-015-0056-9&volume=2&issue=2&pages=175-184&publication_year=2015&author=Andreassen%2CCS)

- Andreassen, C. S., Pallesen, S., & Griffiths, M. D. (2017). The relationship between addictive use of social media, narcissism, and self-esteem: Findings from a large national survey. _Addictive Behaviors,_ _64_(64), 287–293. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.03.006](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.03.006)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.addbeh.2016.03.006) [PubMed](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=27072491) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=The%20relationship%20between%20addictive%20use%20of%20social%20media%2C%20narcissism%2C%20and%20self-esteem%3A%20Findings%20from%20a%20large%20national%20survey&journal=Addictive%20Behaviors&doi=10.1016%2Fj.addbeh.2016.03.006&volume=64&issue=64&pages=287-293&publication_year=2017&author=Andreassen%2CCS&author=Pallesen%2CS&author=Griffiths%2CMD)

- Appel, H., Gerlach, A. L., & Crusius, J. (2016). The interplay between Facebook use, social comparison, envy, and depression. _Current Opinion in Psychology,_ _9_, 44–49. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.10.006](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.10.006)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.copsyc.2015.10.006) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=The%20interplay%20between%20Facebook%20use%2C%20social%20comparison%2C%20envy%2C%20and%20depression&journal=Current%20Opinion%20in%20Psychology&doi=10.1016%2Fj.copsyc.2015.10.006&volume=9&pages=44-49&publication_year=2016&author=Appel%2CH&author=Gerlach%2CAL&author=Crusius%2CJ)

- Arshad, M., Zaidi, S. M. I. H., & Mahmood, K. (2015). Self-esteem & academic performance among university students. _Journal of Education and Practice,_ _6_(1), 156–162.

[Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Self-esteem%20%26%20academic%20performance%20among%20university%20students&journal=Journal%20of%20Education%20and%20Practice&volume=6&issue=1&pages=156-162&publication_year=2015&author=Arshad%2CM&author=Zaidi%2CSMIH&author=Mahmood%2CK)

- Astatke, M., Weng, C., & Chen, H. (2022). Does Facebook use influence users’ psychological well-being (PWB)? A literature review on trends and psychological well-being effects of Facebook use. _Universal Access in the Information Society._ [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-022-00938-z](https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-022-00938-z)

[Article](https://link.springer.com/doi/10.1007/s10209-022-00938-z) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Does%20Facebook%20use%20influence%20users%E2%80%99%20psychological%20well-being%20%28PWB%29%3F%20A%20literature%20review%20on%20trends%20and%20psychological%20well-being%20effects%20of%20Facebook%20use&journal=Universal%20Access%20in%20the%20Information%20Society.&doi=10.1007%2Fs10209-022-00938-z&publication_year=2022&author=Astatke%2CM&author=Weng%2CC&author=Chen%2CH)

- Banjanin, N., Banjanin, N., Dimitrijevic, I., & Pantic, I. (2015). Relationship between internet use and depression: Focus on physiological mood oscillations, social networking and online addictive behavior. _Computers in Human Behavior,_ _43_, 308–312. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.013](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.013)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.chb.2014.11.013) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Relationship%20between%20internet%20use%20and%20depression%3A%20Focus%20on%20physiological%20mood%20oscillations%2C%20social%20networking%20and%20online%20addictive%20behavior&journal=Computers%20in%20Human%20Behavior&doi=10.1016%2Fj.chb.2014.11.013&volume=43&pages=308-312&publication_year=2015&author=Banjanin%2CN&author=Banjanin%2CN&author=Dimitrijevic%2CI&author=Pantic%2CI)

- Bergagna, E., & Tartaglia, S. (2018). Self-esteem, social comparison, and Facebook use. _Europe’s Journal of Psychology,_ _14_(4), 831–845. [https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v14i4.1592](https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v14i4.1592)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.5964%2Fejop.v14i4.1592) [PubMed](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=30555588) [PubMed Central](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6266525) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Self-esteem%2C%20social%20comparison%2C%20and%20Facebook%20use&journal=Europe%E2%80%99s%20Journal%20of%20Psychology&doi=10.5964%2Fejop.v14i4.1592&volume=14&issue=4&pages=831-845&publication_year=2018&author=Bergagna%2CE&author=Tartaglia%2CS)

- Bonsaksen, T., Ruffolo, M., Leung, J., Price, D., Thygesen, H., Schoultz, M., & Geirdal, A. Ø. (2021). Loneliness and its association with social media use during the COVID-19 outbreak. _Social Media + Society,_ _7_(3), 205630512110338. [https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211033821](https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211033821)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1177%2F20563051211033821) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Loneliness%20and%20its%20association%20with%20social%20media%20use%20during%20the%20COVID-19%20outbreak&journal=Social%20Media%20%2B%20Society&doi=10.1177%2F20563051211033821&volume=7&issue=3&publication_year=2021&author=Bonsaksen%2CT&author=Ruffolo%2CM&author=Leung%2CJ&author=Price%2CD&author=Thygesen%2CH&author=Schoultz%2CM&author=Geirdal%2CA%C3%98)

- Bradley, S. W., Roberts, J. A., & Bradley, P. W. (2019). Experimental evidence of observed social media status cues on perceived likability. _Psychology of Popular Media Culture,_ _8_(1), 41–51. [https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000164](https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000164)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1037%2Fppm0000164) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Experimental%20evidence%20of%20observed%20social%20media%20status%20cues%20on%20perceived%20likability&journal=Psychology%20of%20Popular%20Media%20Culture&doi=10.1037%2Fppm0000164&volume=8&issue=1&pages=41-51&publication_year=2019&author=Bradley%2CSW&author=Roberts%2CJA&author=Bradley%2CPW)

- Brailovskaia, J., & Margraf, J. (2020). Relationship between depression symptoms, physical activity, and addictive social media use. _Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking_, _23_(12), 818–822. [https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2020.0255](https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2020.0255)

- Brailovskaia, J., Truskauskaite-Kuneviciene, I., Kazlauskas, E., & Margraf, J. (2021). The patterns of problematic social media use (SMU) and their relationship with online flow, life satisfaction, depression, anxiety and stress symptoms in Lithuania and in Germany. _Current Psychology_. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01711-w](https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01711-w)

[Article](https://link.springer.com/doi/10.1007/s12144-021-01711-w) [PubMed](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=34690477) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=The%20patterns%20of%20problematic%20social%20media%20use%20%28SMU%29%20and%20their%20relationship%20with%20online%20flow%2C%20life%20satisfaction%2C%20depression%2C%20anxiety%20and%20stress%20symptoms%20in%20Lithuania%20and%20in%20Germany&journal=Current%20Psychology&doi=10.1007%2Fs12144-021-01711-w&publication_year=2021&author=Brailovskaia%2CJ&author=Truskauskaite-Kuneviciene%2CI&author=Kazlauskas%2CE&author=Margraf%2CJ)

- Burrow, A. L., & Rainone, N. (2017). How many likes did I get?: Purpose moderates links between positive social media feedback and self-esteem. _Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,_ _69_(69), 232–236. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.09.005](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.09.005)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.jesp.2016.09.005) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=How%20many%20likes%20did%20I%20get%3F%3A%20Purpose%20moderates%20links%20between%20positive%20social%20media%20feedback%20and%20self-esteem&journal=Journal%20of%20Experimental%20Social%20Psychology&doi=10.1016%2Fj.jesp.2016.09.005&volume=69&issue=69&pages=232-236&publication_year=2017&author=Burrow%2CAL&author=Rainone%2CN)

- Caba Machado, V., Mcilroy, D., Padilla Adamuz, F. M., et al. (2023). The associations of use of social network sites with perceived social support and loneliness. _Current Psychology,_ _42_, 14414–14427. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02673-9](https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02673-9)

[Article](https://link.springer.com/doi/10.1007/s12144-021-02673-9) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=The%20associations%20of%20use%20of%20social%20network%20sites%20with%20perceived%20social%20support%20and%20loneliness&journal=Current%20Psychology&doi=10.1007%2Fs12144-021-02673-9&volume=42&pages=14414-14427&publication_year=2023&author=Caba%20Machado%2CV&author=Mcilroy%2CD&author=Padilla%20Adamuz%2CFM)

- Cacioppo, J. T., Cacioppo, S., & Boomsma, D. I. (2014). Evolutionary mechanisms for loneliness. _Cognition & Emotion,_ _28_(1), 3–21. [https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2013.837379](https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2013.837379)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1080%2F02699931.2013.837379) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Evolutionary%20mechanisms%20for%20loneliness&journal=Cognition%20%26%20Emotion&doi=10.1080%2F02699931.2013.837379&volume=28&issue=1&pages=3-21&publication_year=2014&author=Cacioppo%2CJT&author=Cacioppo%2CS&author=Boomsma%2CDI)

- Carbonell, X., & Panova, T. (2016). A critical consideration of social networking sites’ addiction potential. _Addiction Research & Theory,_ _25_(1), 48–57. [https://doi.org/10.1080/16066359.2016.1197915](https://doi.org/10.1080/16066359.2016.1197915)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1080%2F16066359.2016.1197915) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=A%20critical%20consideration%20of%20social%20networking%20sites%E2%80%99%20addiction%20potential&journal=Addiction%20Research%20%26%20Theory&doi=10.1080%2F16066359.2016.1197915&volume=25&issue=1&pages=48-57&publication_year=2016&author=Carbonell%2CX&author=Panova%2CT)

- Carraturo, F., Di Perna, T., Giannicola, V., Nacchia, M. A., Pepe, M., Muzii, B., & Scandurra, C. (2023). Envy, social comparison, and depression on social networking sites: A systematic review. _European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education,_ _13_(2), 364–376. [https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13020027](https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13020027)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.3390%2Fejihpe13020027) [PubMed](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=36826211) [PubMed Central](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9955439) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Envy%2C%20social%20comparison%2C%20and%20depression%20on%20social%20networking%20sites%3A%20A%20systematic%20review&journal=European%20Journal%20of%20Investigation%20in%20Health%2C%20Psychology%20and%20Education&doi=10.3390%2Fejihpe13020027&volume=13&issue=2&pages=364-376&publication_year=2023&author=Carraturo%2CF&author=Perna%2CT&author=Giannicola%2CV&author=Nacchia%2CMA&author=Pepe%2CM&author=Muzii%2CB&author=Scandurra%2CC)

- Chamberlain, S. R., Lochner, C., Stein, D. J., Goudriaan, A. E., van Holst, R. J., Zohar, J., & Grant, J. E. (2016). Behavioural addiction—A rising tide? _European Neuropsychopharmacology,_ _26_(5), 841–855. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.08.013](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.08.013)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.euroneuro.2015.08.013) [CAS](/articles/cas-redirect/1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXhsVajsrfF) [PubMed](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=26585600) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Behavioural%20addiction%E2%80%94A%20rising%20tide%3F&journal=European%20Neuropsychopharmacology&doi=10.1016%2Fj.euroneuro.2015.08.013&volume=26&issue=5&pages=841-855&publication_year=2016&author=Chamberlain%2CSR&author=Lochner%2CC&author=Stein%2CDJ&author=Goudriaan%2CAE&author=Holst%2CRJ&author=Zohar%2CJ&author=Grant%2CJE)

- Chua, T. H. H., & Chang, L. (2016). Follow me and like my beautiful selfies: Singapore teenage girls’ engagement in self-presentation and peer comparison on social media. _Computers in Human Behavior,_ _55_(A), 190–197.

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.chb.2015.09.011) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Follow%20me%20and%20like%20my%20beautiful%20selfies%3A%20Singapore%20teenage%20girls%E2%80%99%20engagement%20in%20self-presentation%20and%20peer%20comparison%20on%20social%20media&journal=Computers%20in%20Human%20Behavior&doi=10.1016%2Fj.chb.2015.09.011&volume=55&issue=A&pages=190-197&publication_year=2016&author=Chua%2CTHH&author=Chang%2CL)

- Cunningham, S., Hudson, C. C., & Harkness, K. (2021). Social media and depression symptoms: A meta-analysis. _Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology_, _49_(2), 241–253. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-020-00715-7](https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-020-00715-7)

- DeRoma, V., Leach, J. P., & Patrick Leverett, J. (2009). The relationship between depression and college academic performance. _College Student Journal,_ _43_(2), 325–334.

[Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=The%20relationship%20between%20depression%20and%20college%20academic%20performance&journal=College%20Student%20Journal&volume=43&issue=2&pages=325-334&publication_year=2009&author=DeRoma%2CV&author=Leach%2CJP&author=Patrick%20Leverett%2CJ)

- Diefenbach, S., & Anders, L. (2021). The psychology of likes: Relevance of feedback on Instagram and relationship to self-esteem and social status. _Psychology of Popular Media_, _11_(2), 196–207. [https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000360](https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000360)

- Dong, Z., & Xie, T. (2022). Why people love short-form videos? The motivations for using Tiktok and implications for well-being. _SSRN Electronic Journal._ [https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4089602](https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4089602)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.2139%2Fssrn.4089602) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Why%20people%20love%20short-form%20videos%3F%20The%20motivations%20for%20using%20Tiktok%20and%20implications%20for%20well-being&journal=SSRN%20Electronic%20Journal.&doi=10.2139%2Fssrn.4089602&publication_year=2022&author=Dong%2CZ&author=Xie%2CT)

- Dumas, T. M., Maxwell-Smith, M., Davis, J. P., & Giulietti, P. A. (2017). Lying or longing for likes? Narcissism, peer belonging, loneliness and normative versus deceptive like-seeking on Instagram in emerging adulthood. _Computers in Human Behavior,_ _71_, 1–10. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.037](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.037)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.chb.2017.01.037) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Lying%20or%20longing%20for%20likes%3F%20Narcissism%2C%20peer%20belonging%2C%20loneliness%20and%20normative%20versus%20deceptive%20like-seeking%20on%20Instagram%20in%20emerging%20adulthood&journal=Computers%20in%20Human%20Behavior&doi=10.1016%2Fj.chb.2017.01.037&volume=71&pages=1-10&publication_year=2017&author=Dumas%2CTM&author=Maxwell-Smith%2CM&author=Davis%2CJP&author=Giulietti%2CPA)

- Dumas, T. M., Maxwell-Smith, M. A., Tremblay, P. F., Litt, D. M., & Ellis, W. (2020). Gaining likes, but at what cost? Longitudinal relations between young adults’ deceptive like-seeking on Instagram, peer belonging and self-esteem. _Computers in Human Behavior,_ _112_, 106467\. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106467](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106467)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.chb.2020.106467) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Gaining%20likes%2C%20but%20at%20what%20cost%3F%20Longitudinal%20relations%20between%20young%20adults%E2%80%99%20deceptive%20like-seeking%20on%20Instagram%2C%20peer%20belonging%20and%20self-esteem&journal=Computers%20in%20Human%20Behavior&doi=10.1016%2Fj.chb.2020.106467&volume=112&publication_year=2020&author=Dumas%2CTM&author=Maxwell-Smith%2CMA&author=Tremblay%2CPF&author=Litt%2CDM&author=Ellis%2CW)

- Faelens, L., Hoorelbeke, K., Cambier, R., van Put, J., Van de Putte, E., Rudi De Raedt, R., & Koster, E. H. W. (2021). The relationship between Instagram use and indicators of mental health: A systematic review. _Computers in Human Behavior Reports,_ _4_, 100121\. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100121](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100121)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.chbr.2021.100121) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=The%20relationship%20between%20Instagram%20use%20and%20indicators%20of%20mental%20health%3A%20A%20systematic%20review&journal=Computers%20in%20Human%20Behavior%20Reports&doi=10.1016%2Fj.chbr.2021.100121&volume=4&publication_year=2021&author=Faelens%2CL&author=Hoorelbeke%2CK&author=Cambier%2CR&author=Put%2CJ&author=Putte%2CE&author=Rudi%20De%20Raedt%2CR&author=Koster%2CEHW)

- Falgoust, G., Winterlind, E., Moon, P., Parker, A., Zinzow, H., & Madathil, K. C. (2022). Applying the uses and gratifications theory to identify motivational factors behind young adult’s participation in viral social media challenges on TikTok. _Human Factors in Healthcare,_ _2_, 100014\. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hfh.2022.100014](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hfh.2022.100014)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.hfh.2022.100014) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Applying%20the%20uses%20and%20gratifications%20theory%20to%20identify%20motivational%20factors%20behind%20young%20adult%E2%80%99s%20participation%20in%20viral%20social%20media%20challenges%20on%20TikTok&journal=Human%20Factors%20in%20Healthcare&doi=10.1016%2Fj.hfh.2022.100014&volume=2&publication_year=2022&author=Falgoust%2CG&author=Winterlind%2CE&author=Moon%2CP&author=Parker%2CA&author=Zinzow%2CH&author=Madathil%2CKC)

- Ferris, A. L., Hollenbaugh, E. E., & Sommer, P. A. (2021). Applying the uses and gratifications model to examine consequences of social media addiction. _Social Media + Society, 7_(2). [https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211019003](https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211019003)

- Frison, E., & Eggermont, S. (2017). Browsing, posting, and liking on Instagram: The reciprocal relationships between different types of instagram use and adolescents’ depressed mood. _Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking,_ _20_(10), 603–609. [https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2017.0156](https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2017.0156)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1089%2Fcyber.2017.0156) [PubMed](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=29039700) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Browsing%2C%20posting%2C%20and%20liking%20on%20Instagram%3A%20The%20reciprocal%20relationships%20between%20different%20types%20of%20instagram%20use%20and%20adolescents%E2%80%99%20depressed%20mood&journal=Cyberpsychology%2C%20Behavior%20and%20Social%20Networking&doi=10.1089%2Fcyber.2017.0156&volume=20&issue=10&pages=603-609&publication_year=2017&author=Frison%2CE&author=Eggermont%2CS)

- Gadekar, R., & Ang, P. H. (2020). Is social media use socially enhancing or compensating? _Journal of Creative Communications,_ _15_(3), 269–288. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0973258620943705](https://doi.org/10.1177/0973258620943705)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0973258620943705) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Is%20social%20media%20use%20socially%20enhancing%20or%20compensating%3F&journal=Journal%20of%20Creative%20Communications&doi=10.1177%2F0973258620943705&volume=15&issue=3&pages=269-288&publication_year=2020&author=Gadekar%2CR&author=Ang%2CPH)

- Griffiths, M. (2005). A “components” model of addiction within a biopsychosocial framework. _Journal of Substance Use,_ _10_(4), 191–197. [https://doi.org/10.1080/14659890500114359](https://doi.org/10.1080/14659890500114359)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1080%2F14659890500114359) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=A%20%E2%80%9Ccomponents%E2%80%9D%20model%20of%20addiction%20within%20a%20biopsychosocial%20framework&journal=Journal%20of%20Substance%20Use&doi=10.1080%2F14659890500114359&volume=10&issue=4&pages=191-197&publication_year=2005&author=Griffiths%2CM)

- Gruner, D. T. (2016). New digital media and flow: A study of experience Creativity. _Theories - Research - Applications,_ _3_(2), 343–362. [https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2016-0021](https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2016-0021)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1515%2Fctra-2016-0021) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=New%20digital%20media%20and%20flow%3A%20A%20study%20of%20experience%20Creativity&journal=Theories%20-%20Research%20-%20Applications&doi=10.1515%2Fctra-2016-0021&volume=3&issue=2&pages=343-362&publication_year=2016&author=Gruner%2CDT)

- Hartanto, A., Quek, F. Y., Tng, G. Y., & Yong, J. C. (2021). Does social media use increase depressive symptoms? A reverse causation perspective. _Frontiers in Psychiatry,_ _12_, 641934\. [https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.641934](https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.641934)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.3389%2Ffpsyt.2021.641934) [PubMed](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=33833700) [PubMed Central](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8021694) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Does%20social%20media%20use%20increase%20depressive%20symptoms%3F%20A%20reverse%20causation%20perspective&journal=Frontiers%20in%20Psychiatry&doi=10.3389%2Ffpsyt.2021.641934&volume=12&publication_year=2021&author=Hartanto%2CA&author=Quek%2CFY&author=Tng%2CGY&author=Yong%2CJC)

- Harter, S., & Whitesell, N. R. (2003). Beyond the debate: Why some adolescents report stable self-worth over time and situation, whereas others report changes in self-worth. _Journal of Personality,_ _71_(6), 1027–1058. [https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.7106006](https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.7106006)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1111%2F1467-6494.7106006) [PubMed](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=14633057) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Beyond%20the%20debate%3A%20Why%20some%20adolescents%20report%20stable%20self-worth%20over%20time%20and%20situation%2C%20whereas%20others%20report%20changes%20in%20self-worth&journal=Journal%20of%20Personality&doi=10.1111%2F1467-6494.7106006&volume=71&issue=6&pages=1027-1058&publication_year=2003&author=Harter%2CS&author=Whitesell%2CNR)

- Hellemans, J., Willems, K., & Brengman, M. (2021). The new adult on the block: Daily active users of TikTok compared to Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram during the COVID-19 crisis in Belgium. In _Digital marketing & eCommerce conference_ (pp. 95–103). Cham: Springer International Publishing. [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76520-0\_10](https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76520-0_10)

- Hou, A. C. Y., & Shiau, W. L. (2019). Understanding Facebook to Instagram migration: a push-pull migration model perspective. _Information Technology & People (ahead-of-print)_. [https://doi.org/10.1108/itp-06-2017-0198](https://doi.org/10.1108/itp-06-2017-0198)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1108%2Fitp-06-2017-0198) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Understanding%20Facebook%20to%20Instagram%20migration%3A%20a%20push-pull%20migration%20model%20perspective&journal=Information%20Technology%20%26%20People%2C%20ahead-of-Print%20%28ahead-of-print%29&doi=10.1108%2Fitp-06-2017-0198&publication_year=2019&author=Hou%2C%2CACY&author=Shiau%2CWL)

- Hussain, A., & Shabir, G. (2020). Cognitive needs and use of social media: A comparative study of gratifications sought and gratification obtained. _Information Discovery and Delivery,_ _48_(2), 79–90. [https://doi.org/10.1108/IDD-11-2019-0081](https://doi.org/10.1108/IDD-11-2019-0081)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1108%2FIDD-11-2019-0081) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Cognitive%20needs%20and%20use%20of%20social%20media%3A%20A%20comparative%20study%20of%20gratifications%20sought%20and%20gratification%20obtained&journal=Information%20Discovery%20and%20Delivery&doi=10.1108%2FIDD-11-2019-0081&volume=48&issue=2&pages=79-90&publication_year=2020&author=Hussain%2CA&author=Shabir%2CG)

- Instagram. (2021). Giving people more control on Instagram and Facebook. [https://about.instagram.com/blog/announcements/giving-people-more-control](https://about.instagram.com/blog/announcements/giving-people-more-control)

- Jan, M., Soomro, S. A., & Ahmad, N. (2017). Impact of social media on self-esteem. _European Scientific Journal, ESJ,_ _13_(23), 329–341. [https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2017.v13n23p329](https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2017.v13n23p329)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.19044%2Fesj.2017.v13n23p329) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Impact%20of%20social%20media%20on%20self-esteem&journal=European%20Scientific%20Journal%2C%20ESJ&doi=10.19044%2Fesj.2017.v13n23p329&volume=13&issue=23&pages=329-341&publication_year=2017&author=Jan%2CM&author=Soomro%2CSA&author=Ahmad%2CN)

- Jian, C. (2023). TikTok vs Instagram influencers. Social cat blog \| get better at influencer marketing. [https://thesocialcat.com/post/tiktok-vs-instagram-influencers](https://thesocialcat.com/post/tiktok-vs-instagram-influencers)

- Jiang, S., & Ngien, A. (2020). The effects of Instagram use, social comparison, and self-esteem on social anxiety: A survey study in Singapore. _Social Media + Society, 6_(2). [https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120912488](https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120912488)

- Jiang, X., Zheng, X., Yang, J., Ye, C., Chen, Y., Zhang, Z., & Xiao, Z. (2015). A systematic review of studies on the prevalence of Insomnia in university students. _Public Health,_ _129_(12), 1579–1584. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2015.07.030](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2015.07.030)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.puhe.2015.07.030) [PubMed](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=26298588) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=A%20systematic%20review%20of%20studies%20on%20the%20prevalence%20of%20Insomnia%20in%20university%20students&journal=Public%20Health&doi=10.1016%2Fj.puhe.2015.07.030&volume=129&issue=12&pages=1579-1584&publication_year=2015&author=Jiang%2CX&author=Zheng%2CX&author=Yang%2CJ&author=Ye%2CC&author=Chen%2CY&author=Zhang%2CZ&author=Xiao%2CZ)

- Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. _Public Opinion Quarterly, 37_(4), 509–523. [https://doi.org/10.1086/268109](https://doi.org/10.1086/268109)

- Kircaburun, K., Alhabash, S., Tosuntaş, ŞB., & Griffiths, M. D. (2020). Uses and gratifications of problematic social media use among university students: A simultaneous examination of the big five of personality traits, social media platforms, and social media use motives. _International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction,_ _18_, 525–547. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-018-9940-6](https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-018-9940-6)

[Article](https://link.springer.com/doi/10.1007/s11469-018-9940-6) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Uses%20and%20gratifications%20of%20problematic%20social%20media%20use%20among%20university%20students%3A%20A%20simultaneous%20examination%20of%20the%20big%20five%20of%20personality%20traits%2C%20social%20media%20platforms%2C%20and%20social%20media%20use%20motives&journal=International%20Journal%20of%20Mental%20Health%20and%20Addiction&doi=10.1007%2Fs11469-018-9940-6&volume=18&pages=525-547&publication_year=2020&author=Kircaburun%2CK&author=Alhabash%2CS&author=Tosunta%C5%9F%2C%C5%9EB&author=Griffiths%2CMD)

- Krause, H.-V., Baum, K., Baumann, A., & Krasnova, H. (2019). Unifying the detrimental and beneficial effects of social network site use on self-esteem: A systematic literature review. _Media Psychology,_ _24_(1), 1–38. [https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2019.1656646](https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2019.1656646)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1080%2F15213269.2019.1656646) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Unifying%20the%20detrimental%20and%20beneficial%20effects%20of%20social%20network%20site%20use%20on%20self-esteem%3A%20A%20systematic%20literature%20review&journal=Media%20Psychology&doi=10.1080%2F15213269.2019.1656646&volume=24&issue=1&pages=1-38&publication_year=2019&author=Krause%2CH-V&author=Baum%2CK&author=Baumann%2CA&author=Krasnova%2CH)

- Laor, T. (2022). My social network: Group differences in frequency of use, active use, and interactive use on Facebook. _Instagram and Twitter. Technology in Society,_ _68_, 101922\. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101922](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101922)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.techsoc.2022.101922) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=My%20social%20network%3A%20Group%20differences%20in%20frequency%20of%20use%2C%20active%20use%2C%20and%20interactive%20use%20on%20Facebook&journal=Instagram%20and%20Twitter.%20Technology%20in%20Society&doi=10.1016%2Fj.techsoc.2022.101922&volume=68&publication_year=2022&author=Laor%2CT)

- Lau, W. W. F. (2017). Effects of social media usage and social media multitasking on the academic performance of university students. _Computers in Human Behavior,_ _68_(68), 286–291. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.043](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.043)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.chb.2016.11.043) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Effects%20of%20social%20media%20usage%20and%20social%20media%20multitasking%20on%20the%20academic%20performance%20of%20university%20students&journal=Computers%20in%20Human%20Behavior&doi=10.1016%2Fj.chb.2016.11.043&volume=68&issue=68&pages=286-291&publication_year=2017&author=Lau%2CWWF)

- Leary, M. R. (2005). Sociometer theory and the pursuit of relational value: Getting to the root of self-esteem. _European Review of Social Psychology,_ _16_(1), 75–111. [https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280540000007](https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280540000007)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1080%2F10463280540000007) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Sociometer%20theory%20and%20the%20pursuit%20of%20relational%20value%3A%20Getting%20to%20the%20root%20of%20self-esteem&journal=European%20Review%20of%20Social%20Psychology&doi=10.1080%2F10463280540000007&volume=16&issue=1&pages=75-111&publication_year=2005&author=Leary%2CMR)

- Lee, E., Lee, J.-A., Moon, J. H., & Sung, Y. (2015). Pictures speak louder than words: Motivations for using Instagram. _Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking,_ _18_(9), 552–556. [https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2015.0157](https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2015.0157)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1089%2Fcyber.2015.0157) [PubMed](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=26348817) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Pictures%20speak%20louder%20than%20words%3A%20Motivations%20for%20using%20Instagram&journal=Cyberpsychology%2C%20Behavior%2C%20and%20Social%20Networking&doi=10.1089%2Fcyber.2015.0157&volume=18&issue=9&pages=552-556&publication_year=2015&author=Lee%2CE&author=Lee%2CJ-A&author=Moon%2CJH&author=Sung%2CY)

- Li, P., Chang, L., Chua, T. H. H., & Loh, R. S. M. (2018). “Likes” as KPI: An examination of teenage girls’ perspective on peer feedback on Instagram and its influence on coping response. _Telematics and Informatics,_ _35_(7), 1994–2005. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.07.003](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.07.003)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.tele.2018.07.003) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=%E2%80%9CLikes%E2%80%9D%20as%20KPI%3A%20An%20examination%20of%20teenage%20girls%E2%80%99%20perspective%20on%20peer%20feedback%20on%20Instagram%20and%20its%20influence%20on%20coping%20response&journal=Telematics%20and%20Informatics&doi=10.1016%2Fj.tele.2018.07.003&volume=35&issue=7&pages=1994-2005&publication_year=2018&author=Li%2CP&author=Chang%2CL&author=Chua%2CTHH&author=Loh%2CRSM)

- Limniou, M., Ascroft, Y., & McLean, S. (2022). Differences between Facebook and Instagram usage in regard to problematic use and well-being. _Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science,_ _7_, 141–150. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s41347-021-00229-z](https://doi.org/10.1007/s41347-021-00229-z)

[Article](https://link.springer.com/doi/10.1007/s41347-021-00229-z) [PubMed](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=34664031) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Differences%20between%20Facebook%20and%20Instagram%20usage%20in%20regard%20to%20problematic%20use%20and%20well-being&journal=Journal%20of%20Technology%20in%20Behavioral%20Science&doi=10.1007%2Fs41347-021-00229-z&volume=7&pages=141-150&publication_year=2022&author=Limniou%2CM&author=Ascroft%2CY&author=McLean%2CS)

- Lopes, L. S., Valentini, J. P., Monteiro, T. H., Costacurta, M. C. de F., Soares, L. O. N., Telfar-Barnard, L., & Nunes, P. V. (2022). Problematic social media use and its relationship with depression or anxiety: A systematic review. _Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking_, _25_(11), 691–702. [https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2021.0300](https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2021.0300)

- Lowe-Calverley, E., Grieve, R., & Padgett, C. (2019). A risky investment? Examining the outcomes of emotional investment in Instagram. _Telematics and Informatics,_ _45_, 101299\. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.101299](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.101299)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.tele.2019.101299) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=A%20risky%20investment%3F%20Examining%20the%20outcomes%20of%20emotional%20investment%20in%20Instagram&journal=Telematics%20and%20Informatics&doi=10.1016%2Fj.tele.2019.101299&volume=45&publication_year=2019&author=Lowe-Calverley%2CE&author=Grieve%2CR&author=Padgett%2CC)

- Lutz, S., & Schneider, F. M. (2020). Is receiving dislikes in social media still better than being ignored? The effects of ostracism and rejection on need threat and coping responses online. _Media Psychology,_ _24_(6), 741–765. [https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2020.1799409](https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2020.1799409)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1080%2F15213269.2020.1799409) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Is%20receiving%20dislikes%20in%20social%20media%20still%20better%20than%20being%20ignored%3F%20The%20effects%20of%20ostracism%20and%20rejection%20on%20need%20threat%20and%20coping%20responses%20online&journal=Media%20Psychology&doi=10.1080%2F15213269.2020.1799409&volume=24&issue=6&pages=741-765&publication_year=2020&author=Lutz%2CS&author=Schneider%2CFM)

- Martinez-Pecino, R., & Garcia-Gavilán, M. (2019). Likes and problematic instagram use: The moderating role of self-esteem. _Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking,_ _22_(6), 412–416. [https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2018.0701](https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2018.0701)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1089%2Fcyber.2018.0701) [PubMed](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=31107106) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Likes%20and%20problematic%20instagram%20use%3A%20The%20moderating%20role%20of%20self-esteem&journal=Cyberpsychology%2C%20Behavior%2C%20and%20Social%20Networking&doi=10.1089%2Fcyber.2018.0701&volume=22&issue=6&pages=412-416&publication_year=2019&author=Martinez-Pecino%2CR&author=Garcia-Gavil%C3%A1n%2CM)

- Marttila, E., Koivula, A., & Räsänen, P. (2021). Does excessive social media use decrease subjective well-being? A longitudinal analysis of the relationship between problematic use, loneliness and life satisfaction. _Telematics and Informatics,_ _59_, 101556\. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101556](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101556)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.tele.2020.101556) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Does%20excessive%20social%20media%20use%20decrease%20subjective%20well-being%3F%20A%20longitudinal%20analysis%20of%20the%20relationship%20between%20problematic%20use%2C%20loneliness%20and%20life%20satisfaction&journal=Telematics%20and%20Informatics&doi=10.1016%2Fj.tele.2020.101556&volume=59&publication_year=2021&author=Marttila%2CE&author=Koivula%2CA&author=R%C3%A4s%C3%A4nen%2CP)

- Masciantonio, A., Bourguignon, D., Bouchat, P., Balty, M., & Rimé, B. (2021). Don’t put all social network sites in one basket: Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, TikTok, and their relations with well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. _PLoS ONE,_ _16_(3), e0248384. [https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248384](https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248384)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0248384) [CAS](/articles/cas-redirect/1:CAS:528:DC%2BB3MXmvFaksLs%3D) [PubMed](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=33705462) [PubMed Central](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7951844) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Don%E2%80%99t%20put%20all%20social%20network%20sites%20in%20one%20basket%3A%20Facebook%2C%20Instagram%2C%20Twitter%2C%20TikTok%2C%20and%20their%20relations%20with%20well-being%20during%20the%20COVID-19%20pandemic&journal=PLoS%20ONE&doi=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0248384&volume=16&issue=3&publication_year=2021&author=Masciantonio%2CA&author=Bourguignon%2CD&author=Bouchat%2CP&author=Balty%2CM&author=Rim%C3%A9%2CB)

- Matook, S., Cummings, J., & Bala, H. (2015). Are you feeling lonely? The impact of relationship characteristics and online social network features on loneliness. _Journal of Management Information Systems,_ _31_(4), 278–310. [https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2014.1001282](https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2014.1001282)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1080%2F07421222.2014.1001282) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Are%20you%20feeling%20lonely%3F%20The%20impact%20of%20relationship%20characteristics%20and%20online%20social%20network%20features%20on%20loneliness&journal=Journal%20of%20Management%20Information%20Systems&doi=10.1080%2F07421222.2014.1001282&volume=31&issue=4&pages=278-310&publication_year=2015&author=Matook%2CS&author=Cummings%2CJ&author=Bala%2CH)

- Meier, A., Gilbert, A., Börner, S., & Possler, D. (2020). Instagram inspiration: How upward comparison on social network sites can contribute to well-being. _Journal of Communication_, _70_(5), 721–743. [https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaa025](https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaa025)

- Meshi, D., & Ellithorpe, M. E. (2021). Problematic social media use and social support received in real-life versus on social media: Associations with depression, anxiety and social isolation. _Addictive Behaviors,_ _119_, 106949\. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.106949](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.106949)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.addbeh.2021.106949) [PubMed](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=33934007) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Problematic%20social%20media%20use%20and%20social%20support%20received%20in%20real-life%20versus%20on%20social%20media%3A%20Associations%20with%20depression%2C%20anxiety%20and%20social%20isolation&journal=Addictive%20Behaviors&doi=10.1016%2Fj.addbeh.2021.106949&volume=119&publication_year=2021&author=Meshi%2CD&author=Ellithorpe%2CME)

- Montag, C., Yang, H., & Elhai, J. D. (2021). On the psychology of TikTok use: A first glimpse from empirical findings. _Frontiers in Public Health_. [https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.641673](https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.641673)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.3389%2Ffpubh.2021.641673) [PubMed](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=33816425) [PubMed Central](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8010681) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=On%20the%20psychology%20of%20TikTok%20use%3A%20A%20first%20glimpse%20from%20empirical%20findings&journal=Frontiers%20in%20Public%20Health&doi=10.3389%2Ffpubh.2021.641673&publication_year=2021&author=Montag%2CC&author=Yang%2CH&author=Elhai%2CJD)

- Moody, E. J. (2004). Internet use and its relationship to loneliness. _CyberPsychology & Behavior,_ _4_(3), 393–401. [https://doi.org/10.1089/109493101300210303](https://doi.org/10.1089/109493101300210303)

- Moreton, L., & Greenfield, S. (2022). University students’ views on the impact of Instagram on mental wellbeing: A qualitative study. _BMC Psychology,_ _10_, 45\. [https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-022-00743-6](https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-022-00743-6)

[Article](https://link.springer.com/doi/10.1186/s40359-022-00743-6) [PubMed](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=35227331) [PubMed Central](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8883692) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=University%20students%E2%80%99%20views%20on%20the%20impact%20of%20Instagram%20on%20mental%20wellbeing%3A%20A%20qualitative%20study&journal=BMC%20Psychology&doi=10.1186%2Fs40359-022-00743-6&volume=10&publication_year=2022&author=Moreton%2CL&author=Greenfield%2CS)

- Neubaum, G., & Krämer, N. C. (2015). My friends right next to me: A laboratory investigation on predictors and consequences of experiencing social closeness on social networking sites. _Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking,_ _18_(8), 443–449. [https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2014.0613](https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2014.0613)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1089%2Fcyber.2014.0613) [PubMed](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=26252929) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=My%20friends%20right%20next%20to%20me%3A%20A%20laboratory%20investigation%20on%20predictors%20and%20consequences%20of%20experiencing%20social%20closeness%20on%20social%20networking%20sites&journal=Cyberpsychology%2C%20Behavior%2C%20and%20Social%20Networking&doi=10.1089%2Fcyber.2014.0613&volume=18&issue=8&pages=443-449&publication_year=2015&author=Neubaum%2CG&author=Kr%C3%A4mer%2CNC)

- Nguyen, D. T., Wright, E. P., Dedding, C., Pham, T. T., & Bunders, J. (2019). Low self-esteem and its association with anxiety, depression, and suicidal ideation in Vietnamese secondary school students: A cross-sectional study. _Frontiers in Psychiatry,_ _10_, 698\. [https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00698](https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00698)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.3389%2Ffpsyt.2019.00698) [PubMed](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=31611825) [PubMed Central](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6777005) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Low%20self-esteem%20and%20its%20association%20with%20anxiety%2C%20depression%2C%20and%20suicidal%20ideation%20in%20Vietnamese%20secondary%20school%20students%3A%20A%20cross-sectional%20study&journal=Frontiers%20in%20Psychiatry&doi=10.3389%2Ffpsyt.2019.00698&volume=10&publication_year=2019&author=Nguyen%2CDT&author=Wright%2CEP&author=Dedding%2CC&author=Pham%2CTT&author=Bunders%2CJ)

- O’Day, E. B., & Heimberg, R. G. (2021). Social media use, social anxiety, and loneliness: A systematic review. _Computers in Human Behavior Reports,_ _3_(100070), 100070. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100070](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100070)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.chbr.2021.100070) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Social%20media%20use%2C%20social%20anxiety%2C%20and%20loneliness%3A%20A%20systematic%20review&journal=Computers%20in%20Human%20Behavior%20Reports&doi=10.1016%2Fj.chbr.2021.100070&volume=3&issue=100070&publication_year=2021&author=O%E2%80%99Day%2CEB&author=Heimberg%2CRG)

- Omar, B., & Dequan, W. (2020). Watch, share or create: The influence of personality traits and user motivation on TikTok mobile video usage. _International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (IJIM),_ _14_(04), 121–137. [https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i04.12429](https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i04.12429)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.3991%2Fijim.v14i04.12429) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Watch%2C%20share%20or%20create%3A%20The%20influence%20of%20personality%20traits%20and%20user%20motivation%20on%20TikTok%20mobile%20video%20usage&journal=International%20Journal%20of%20Interactive%20Mobile%20Technologies%20%28IJIM%29&doi=10.3991%2Fijim.v14i04.12429&volume=14&issue=04&pages=121-137&publication_year=2020&author=Omar%2CB&author=Dequan%2CW)

- Ostic, D., Qalati, S. A., Barbosa, B., Shah, S. M. M., Galvan Vela, E., Herzallah, A. M., & Liu, F. (2021). Effects of social media use on psychological well-being: A mediated model. _Frontiers in Psychology,_ _12_, 678766\. [https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.678766](https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.678766)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.3389%2Ffpsyg.2021.678766) [PubMed](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=34234717) [PubMed Central](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8255677) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Effects%20of%20social%20media%20use%20on%20psychological%20well-being%3A%20A%20mediated%20model&journal=Frontiers%20in%20Psychology&doi=10.3389%2Ffpsyg.2021.678766&volume=12&publication_year=2021&author=Ostic%2CD&author=Qalati%2CSA&author=Barbosa%2CB&author=Shah%2CSMM&author=Galvan%20Vela%2CE&author=Herzallah%2CAM&author=Liu%2CF)

- Ozimek, P., Lainas, S., Bierhoff, H.-W., & Rohmann, E. (2023). How photo editing in social media shapes self-perceived attractiveness and self-esteem via self-objectification and physical appearance comparisons. _BMC Psychology_, _11_(1). [https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01143-0](https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01143-0)

- Petropoulos Petalas, D., Konijn, E. A., Johnson, B. K., Veldhuis, J., Bij de Vaate, N. A. J. D., Burgers, C., Droog, E., Międzobrodzka, E., Balint, K. E., & van de Schoot, R. (2021). Plurality in the measurement of social media use and mental health: An exploratory study among adolescents and young adults. _Social Media + Society, 7_(3). [https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211035353](https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211035353)

- Pittman, M., & Reich, B. (2016). Social media and loneliness: Why an Instagram picture may be worth more than a thousand Twitter words. _Computers in Human Behavior,_ _62_(62), 155–167. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.084](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.084)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.chb.2016.03.084) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Social%20media%20and%20loneliness%3A%20Why%20an%20Instagram%20picture%20may%20be%20worth%20more%20than%20a%20thousand%20Twitter%20words&journal=Computers%20in%20Human%20Behavior&doi=10.1016%2Fj.chb.2016.03.084&volume=62&issue=62&pages=155-167&publication_year=2016&author=Pittman%2CM&author=Reich%2CB)

- Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. _Applied Psychological Measurement,_ _1_(3), 385–401. [https://doi.org/10.1177/014662167700100306](https://doi.org/10.1177/014662167700100306)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1177%2F014662167700100306) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=The%20CES-D%20scale%3A%20A%20self-report%20depression%20scale%20for%20research%20in%20the%20general%20population&journal=Applied%20Psychological%20Measurement&doi=10.1177%2F014662167700100306&volume=1&issue=3&pages=385-401&publication_year=1977&author=Radloff%2CLS)

- Rasmussen, E. E., Punyanunt-Carter, N., LaFreniere, J. R., Norman, M. S., & Kimball, T. G. (2020). The serially mediated relationship between emerging adults’ social media use and mental well-being. _Computers in Human Behavior,_ _102_, 206–213. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.019](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.019)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.chb.2019.08.019) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=The%20serially%20mediated%20relationship%20between%20emerging%20adults%E2%80%99%20social%20media%20use%20and%20mental%20well-being&journal=Computers%20in%20Human%20Behavior&doi=10.1016%2Fj.chb.2019.08.019&volume=102&pages=206-213&publication_year=2020&author=Rasmussen%2CEE&author=Punyanunt-Carter%2CN&author=LaFreniere%2CJR&author=Norman%2CMS&author=Kimball%2CTG)

- Reich, S., Schneider, F. M., & Zwillich, B. (2023). No likes–no control? Examining the role of coping deprivation and social anxiety in social media ostracism. _Behaviour & Information Technology, 43_(2), 284–297. [https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2022.2161938](https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2022.2161938)

- Roberts, J. A., & David, M. E. (2023). Instagram and TikTok flow states and their association with psychological well-being. _Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 26_(2), 80–89. [https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2022.0117](https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2022.0117)

- Rosenberg, M. (1965a). Rosenberg self-esteem scale (RSE). _Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. Measures Package,_ _61_(52), 18.

[Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Rosenberg%20self-esteem%20scale%20%28RSE%29&journal=Acceptance%20and%20Commitment%20Therapy.%20Measures%20Package&volume=61&issue=52&publication_year=1965&author=Rosenberg%2CM)

- Rosenberg, M. (1965b). _Society and the adolescent self-image_. Princeton University Press.

[Book](https://doi.org/10.1515%2F9781400876136) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Society%20and%20the%20adolescent%20self-image&doi=10.1515%2F9781400876136&publication_year=1965&author=Rosenberg%2CM)

- Ruby, D. (2022). 71+ Instagram statistics 2022 \[The revamped list\]. Demandsage. [https://www.demandsage.com/instagram-statistics/#:~:text=Instagram%20Monthly%20Active%20Users%20(MAUs](https://www.demandsage.com/instagram-statistics/#:~:text=Instagram%20Monthly%20Active%20Users%20(MAUs)

- Russell, D., Peplau, L. A., & Ferguson, M. L. (1978). Developing a measure of loneliness. _Journal of Personality Assessment,_ _42_(3), 290–294. [https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4203\_11](https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4203_11)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1207%2Fs15327752jpa4203_11) [CAS](/articles/cas-redirect/1:STN:280:DyaE1c7ps1ChsQ%3D%3D) [PubMed](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=660402) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Developing%20a%20measure%20of%20loneliness&journal=Journal%20of%20Personality%20Assessment&doi=10.1207%2Fs15327752jpa4203_11&volume=42&issue=3&pages=290-294&publication_year=1978&author=Russell%2CD&author=Peplau%2CLA&author=Ferguson%2CML)

- Scharkow, M. (2016). The accuracy of self-reported internet use—A validation study using client log data. _Communication Methods and Measures,_ _10_(1), 13–27. [https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2015.1118446](https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2015.1118446)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1080%2F19312458.2015.1118446) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=The%20accuracy%20of%20self-reported%20internet%20use%E2%80%94A%20validation%20study%20using%20client%20log%20data&journal=Communication%20Methods%20and%20Measures&doi=10.1080%2F19312458.2015.1118446&volume=10&issue=1&pages=13-27&publication_year=2016&author=Scharkow%2CM)

- Sha, P., & Dong, X. (2021). Research on adolescents regarding the indirect effect of depression, anxiety, and stress between TikTok use disorder and memory loss. _International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,_ _18_(16), 8820. [https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168820](https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168820)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.3390%2Fijerph18168820) [PubMed](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=34444569) [PubMed Central](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8393543) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Research%20on%20adolescents%20regarding%20the%20indirect%20effect%20of%20depression%2C%20anxiety%2C%20and%20stress%20between%20TikTok%20use%20disorder%20and%20memory%20loss&journal=International%20Journal%20of%20Environmental%20Research%20and%20Public%20Health&doi=10.3390%2Fijerph18168820&volume=18&issue=16&publication_year=2021&author=Sha%2CP&author=Dong%2CX)

- Shane-Simpson, C., Manago, A., Gaggi, N., & Gillespie-Lynch, K. (2018). Why do college students prefer Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram? Site affordances, tensions between privacy and self-expression, and implications for social capital. _Computers in Human Behavior,_ _86_, 276–288. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.041](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.041)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.chb.2018.04.041) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Why%20do%20college%20students%20prefer%20Facebook%2C%20Twitter%2C%20or%20Instagram%3F%20Site%20affordances%2C%20tensions%20between%20privacy%20and%20self-expression%2C%20and%20implications%20for%20social%20capital&journal=Computers%20in%20Human%20Behavior&doi=10.1016%2Fj.chb.2018.04.041&volume=86&pages=276-288&publication_year=2018&author=Shane-Simpson%2CC&author=Manago%2CA&author=Gaggi%2CN&author=Gillespie-Lynch%2CK)

- Sherman, L. E., Hernandez, L. M., Greenfield, P. M., & Dapretto, M. (2018). What the brain “likes”: Neural correlates of providing feedback on social media. _Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience,_ _13_(7), 699–707. [https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsy051](https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsy051)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1093%2Fscan%2Fnsy051) [PubMed](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=29982823) [PubMed Central](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6121147) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=What%20the%20brain%20%E2%80%9Clikes%E2%80%9D%3A%20Neural%20correlates%20of%20providing%20feedback%20on%20social%20media&journal=Social%20Cognitive%20and%20Affective%20Neuroscience&doi=10.1093%2Fscan%2Fnsy051&volume=13&issue=7&pages=699-707&publication_year=2018&author=Sherman%2CLE&author=Hernandez%2CLM&author=Greenfield%2CPM&author=Dapretto%2CM)

- Smith, T., & Short, A. (2022). Needs affordance as a key factor in likelihood of problematic social media use: Validation, latent profile analysis and comparison of TikTok and Facebook problematic use measures. _Addictive Behaviors,_ _129_(107259), 107259. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107259](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107259)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.addbeh.2022.107259) [PubMed](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=35091200) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Needs%20affordance%20as%20a%20key%20factor%20in%20likelihood%20of%20problematic%20social%20media%20use%3A%20Validation%2C%20latent%20profile%20analysis%20and%20comparison%20of%20TikTok%20and%20Facebook%20problematic%20use%20measures&journal=Addictive%20Behaviors&doi=10.1016%2Fj.addbeh.2022.107259&volume=129&issue=107259&publication_year=2022&author=Smith%2CT&author=Short%2CA)

- Stapleton, P., Luiz, G., & Chatwin, H. (2017). Generation validation: The role of social comparison in use of Instagram among emerging adults. _Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking,_ _20_(3), 142–149. [https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.0444](https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.0444)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1089%2Fcyber.2016.0444) [PubMed](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=28263682) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Generation%20validation%3A%20The%20role%20of%20social%20comparison%20in%20use%20of%20Instagram%20among%20emerging%20adults&journal=Cyberpsychology%2C%20Behavior%2C%20and%20Social%20Networking&doi=10.1089%2Fcyber.2016.0444&volume=20&issue=3&pages=142-149&publication_year=2017&author=Stapleton%2CP&author=Luiz%2CG&author=Chatwin%2CH)

- Statista. (2022a). Daily social media usage worldwide. Statista. [https://www.statista.com/statistics/433871/daily-social-media-usage-worldwide/](https://www.statista.com/statistics/433871/daily-social-media-usage-worldwide/)

- Statista. (2022b). Top mobile apps worldwide by downloads 2021. Statista. [https://www.statista.com/statistics/1285960/top-downloaded-mobile-apps-worldwide/](https://www.statista.com/statistics/1285960/top-downloaded-mobile-apps-worldwide/)

- Statista. (2023a). Social media users worldwide 2019–2028. [https://www-statista-com.liverpool.idm.oclc.org/forecasts/1146659/social-media-users-in-the-world](https://www-statista-com.liverpool.idm.oclc.org/forecasts/1146659/social-media-users-in-the-world)

- Statista. (2023b). Instagram: Distribution of global audiences 2023, by age and gender. [https://www.statista.com/statistics/248769/age-distribution-of-worldwide-instagram-users/](https://www.statista.com/statistics/248769/age-distribution-of-worldwide-instagram-users/)

- Statista. (2023c). TikTok: Distribution of global audiences 2023, by age and gender. [https://www.statista.com/statistics/1299771/tiktok-global-user-age-distribution/](https://www.statista.com/statistics/1299771/tiktok-global-user-age-distribution/)

- Statista. (2023d). Average daily time spent in the United Kingdom (UK) on leading social media apps from 2019 to 2024. [https://www.statista.com/statistics/1371857/time-spent-daily-social-media/](https://www.statista.com/statistics/1371857/time-spent-daily-social-media/)

- Stokes, J., & Price, B. (2017). Social media, visual culture and contemporary identity. In _11th International Multi-conference on society, cybernetics and informatics_. IMSCI: [https://www.iiis.org/CDs2017/CD2017Summer/papers/EA876TF.pdf](https://www.iiis.org/CDs2017/CD2017Summer/papers/EA876TF.pdf)

- Subramanian, K. R. (2017). Influence of social media in interpersonal communication. _International Journal of Scientific Progress and Research,_ _38_(109), 70–75.

[Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Influence%20of%20social%20media%20in%20interpersonal%20communication&journal=International%20Journal%20of%20Scientific%20Progress%20and%20Research&volume=38&issue=109&pages=70-75&publication_year=2017&author=Subramanian%2CKR)

- Taylor, J., & Lay, J. (2024). Chapter ten - The relationship between social media use and perceptions of online and offline loneliness during social distancing restrictions. In V. Benson (Ed.), _Handbook of social media use online relationships, security, privacy, and society_ (Vol 2, pp. 217–243). Academic Press.

[Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Chapter%20ten%20-%20The%20relationship%20between%20social%20media%20use%20and%20perceptions%20of%20online%20and%20offline%20loneliness%20during%20social%20distancing%20restrictions&pages=217-243&publication_year=2024&author=Taylor%2CJ&author=Lay%2CJ)

- Valkenburg, P. M. (2022). Social media use and well-being: What we know and what we need to know. _Current Opinion in Psychology,_ _45_, 101294\. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.12.006](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.12.006)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.copsyc.2021.12.006) [PubMed](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=35016087) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Social%20media%20use%20and%20well-being%3A%20What%20we%20know%20and%20what%20we%20need%20to%20know&journal=Current%20Opinion%20in%20Psychology&doi=10.1016%2Fj.copsyc.2021.12.006&volume=45&publication_year=2022&author=Valkenburg%2CPM)

- Valkenburg, P. M., van Driel, I. I., & Beyens, I. (2022). The associations of active and passive social media use with well-being: A critical scoping review. _New Media & Society,_ _24_(2), 530–549. [https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211065425](https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211065425)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1177%2F14614448211065425) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=The%20associations%20of%20active%20and%20passive%20social%20media%20use%20with%20well-being%3A%20A%20critical%20scoping%20review&journal=New%20Media%20%26%20Society&doi=10.1177%2F14614448211065425&volume=24&issue=2&pages=530-549&publication_year=2022&author=Valkenburg%2CPM&author=Driel%2CII&author=Beyens%2CI)

- Vasileiou, K., Barnett, J., Barreto, M., Vines, J., Atkinson, M., Long, K., & Wilson, M. (2019). Coping with loneliness at university: A qualitative interview study with students in the UK. _Mental Health & Prevention,_ _13_, 21–30. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mhp.2018.11.002](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mhp.2018.11.002)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.mhp.2018.11.002) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Coping%20with%20loneliness%20at%20university%3A%20A%20qualitative%20interview%20study%20with%20students%20in%20the%20UK&journal=Mental%20Health%20%26%20Prevention&doi=10.1016%2Fj.mhp.2018.11.002&volume=13&pages=21-30&publication_year=2019&author=Vasileiou%2CK&author=Barnett%2CJ&author=Barreto%2CM&author=Vines%2CJ&author=Atkinson%2CM&author=Long%2CK&author=Wilson%2CM)

- Verduyn, P., Gugushvili, N., Massar, K., Täht, K., & Kross, E. (2020). Social comparison on social networking sites. _Current Opinion in Psychology,_ _36_, 32–37. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.04.002](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.04.002)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.copsyc.2020.04.002) [PubMed](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=32387840) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Social%20comparison%20on%20social%20networking%20sites&journal=Current%20Opinion%20in%20Psychology&doi=10.1016%2Fj.copsyc.2020.04.002&volume=36&pages=32-37&publication_year=2020&author=Verduyn%2CP&author=Gugushvili%2CN&author=Massar%2CK&author=T%C3%A4ht%2CK&author=Kross%2CE)

- Verduyn, P., Ybarra, O., Résibois, M., Jonides, J., & Kross, E. (2017). Do Social network sites enhance or undermine subjective well-being? A critical review. _Social Issues and Policy Review,_ _11_(1), 274–302. [https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12033](https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12033)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fsipr.12033) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Do%20Social%20network%20sites%20enhance%20or%20undermine%20subjective%20well-being%3F%20A%20critical%20review&journal=Social%20Issues%20and%20Policy%20Review&doi=10.1111%2Fsipr.12033&volume=11&issue=1&pages=274-302&publication_year=2017&author=Verduyn%2CP&author=Ybarra%2CO&author=R%C3%A9sibois%2CM&author=Jonides%2CJ&author=Kross%2CE)

- Wallace, E., & Buil, I. (2021). Hiding Instagram likes: Effects on negative affect and loneliness. _Personality and Individual Differences,_ _170_, 110509\. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110509](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110509)

- Williams, K. D. (2009). Ostracism: A temporal need-threat model. _Advances in Experimental Social Psychology,_ _41_, 275–314. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)00406-1](https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)00406-1)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1016%2FS0065-2601%2808%2900406-1) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Ostracism%3A%20A%20temporal%20need-threat%20model&journal=Advances%20in%20Experimental%20Social%20Psychology&doi=10.1016%2FS0065-2601%2808%2900406-1&volume=41&pages=275-314&publication_year=2009&author=Williams%2CKD)

- Wolfers, L. N., & Schneider, F. M. (2021). Using media for coping: A scoping review. _Communication Research,_ _48_(8), 1210–1234. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650220939778](https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650220939778)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0093650220939778) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=Using%20media%20for%20coping%3A%20A%20scoping%20review&journal=Communication%20Research&doi=10.1177%2F0093650220939778&volume=48&issue=8&pages=1210-1234&publication_year=2021&author=Wolfers%2CLN&author=Schneider%2CFM)

- Wood, A. M., & Joseph, S. (2010). The absence of positive psychological (eudemonic) well-being as a risk factor for depression: A ten year cohort study. _Journal of Affective Disorders,_ _122_(3), 213–217. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2009.06.032](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2009.06.032)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.jad.2009.06.032) [PubMed](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=19706357) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=The%20absence%20of%20positive%20psychological%20%28eudemonic%29%20well-being%20as%20a%20risk%20factor%20for%20depression%3A%20A%20ten%20year%20cohort%20study&journal=Journal%20of%20Affective%20Disorders&doi=10.1016%2Fj.jad.2009.06.032&volume=122&issue=3&pages=213-217&publication_year=2010&author=Wood%2CAM&author=Joseph%2CS)

- World Health Organization. (2023). Depressive disorder (depression). World Health Organization. [https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/depression](https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/depression)

- Zhang, C. A., Tang, L., & Liu, Z. (2023). How social media usage affects psychological and subjective well-being: Testing a moderated mediation model. _BMC Psychology,_ _11_(1), 286. [https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01311-2](https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01311-2)

[Article](https://link.springer.com/doi/10.1186/s40359-023-01311-2) [PubMed](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=37737198) [PubMed Central](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10515432) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=How%20social%20media%20usage%20affects%20psychological%20and%20subjective%20well-being%3A%20Testing%20a%20moderated%20mediation%20model&journal=BMC%20Psychology&doi=10.1186%2Fs40359-023-01311-2&volume=11&issue=1&publication_year=2023&author=Zhang%2CCA&author=Tang%2CL&author=Liu%2CZ)

- Zhao, H., & Wagner, C. (2022). How TikTok leads users to flow experience: Investigating the effects of technology affordances with user experience level and video length as moderators. _Internet Research_. [https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-08-2021-0595](https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-08-2021-0595)

[Article](https://doi.org/10.1108%2Fintr-08-2021-0595) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=How%20TikTok%20leads%20users%20to%20flow%20experience%3A%20Investigating%20the%20effects%20of%20technology%20affordances%20with%20user%20experience%20level%20and%20video%20length%20as%20moderators&journal=Internet%20Research&doi=10.1108%2Fintr-08-2021-0595&publication_year=2022&author=Zhao%2CH&author=Wagner%2CC)


[Download references](https://citation-needed.springer.com/v2/references/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6?format=refman&flavour=references)

## Author information

### Authors and Affiliations

1. Department of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK

Calanthe Hendrikse & Maria Limniou


Authors

1. Calanthe Hendrikse


[View author publications](/search?dc.creator=Calanthe%20Hendrikse)





You can also search for this author in
[PubMed](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=search&term=Calanthe%20Hendrikse) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?as_q=&num=10&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=any&as_sauthors=%22Calanthe%20Hendrikse%22&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_allsubj=all&hl=en)

2. Maria Limniou


[View author publications](/search?dc.creator=Maria%20Limniou)





You can also search for this author in
[PubMed](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=search&term=Maria%20Limniou) [Google Scholar](http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?as_q=&num=10&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=any&as_sauthors=%22Maria%20Limniou%22&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_allsubj=all&hl=en)


### Contributions

All authors contributed to the study’s conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Calanthe Hendrikse and Maria Limniou. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Calanthe Hendrikse, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

### Corresponding author

Correspondence to
[Maria Limniou](mailto:Maria.Limniou@liverpool.ac.uk).

## Ethics declarations

### Ethics Approval

This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of the University of Liverpool (date 03.10.2022/no.5860).

### Consent to Participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

### Consent to Publish

All data is anonymised, and no identifiable information is included. Participants provided consent for anonymised data to be published.

### Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

## Additional information

### Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Rights and permissions

**Open Access** This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

[Reprints and permissions](https://s100.copyright.com/AppDispatchServlet?title=The%20Use%20of%20Instagram%20and%20TikTok%20in%20Relation%20to%20Problematic%20Use%20and%20Well-Being&author=Calanthe%20Hendrikse%20et%20al&contentID=10.1007%2Fs41347-024-00399-6&copyright=The%20Author%28s%29&publication=2366-5963&publicationDate=2024-03-04&publisherName=SpringerNature&orderBeanReset=true&oa=CC%20BY)

## About this article

[![Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark]()](https://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6)

### Cite this article

Hendrikse, C., Limniou, M. The Use of Instagram and TikTok in Relation to Problematic Use and Well-Being.
_J. technol. behav. sci._ (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6

[Download citation](https://citation-needed.springer.com/v2/references/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6?format=refman&flavour=citation)

- Received: 19 July 2023

- Revised: 09 January 2024

- Accepted: 16 February 2024

- Published: 04 March 2024

- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41347-024-00399-6


### Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Get shareable link

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Copy to clipboard

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative


### Keywords

- [TikTok](/search?query=TikTok&facet-discipline="Psychology")
- [Instagram](/search?query=Instagram&facet-discipline="Psychology")
- [Self-esteem](/search?query=Self-esteem&facet-discipline="Psychology")
- [Depression](/search?query=Depression&facet-discipline="Psychology")
- [Loneliness](/search?query=Loneliness&facet-discipline="Psychology")
- [Problematic use](/search?query=Problematic%20use&facet-discipline="Psychology")

[Use our pre-submission checklist](https://beta.springernature.com/pre-submission?journalId=41347)

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

## Search

Search by keyword or author

Search

## Navigation

- [Find a journal](https://link.springer.com/journals/)
- [Publish with us](https://www.springernature.com/gp/authors)
- [Track your research](https://link.springernature.com/home/)

### Discover content

- [Journals A-Z](https://link.springer.com/journals/a/1)
- [Books A-Z](https://link.springer.com/books/a/1)

### Publish with us

- [Publish your research](https://www.springernature.com/gp/authors)
- [Open access publishing](https://www.springernature.com/gp/open-research/about/the-fundamentals-of-open-access-and-open-research)

### Products and services

- [Our products](https://www.springernature.com/gp/products)
- [Librarians](https://www.springernature.com/gp/librarians)
- [Societies](https://www.springernature.com/gp/societies)
- [Partners and advertisers](https://www.springernature.com/gp/partners)

### Our imprints

- [Springer](https://www.springer.com/)
- [Nature Portfolio](https://www.nature.com/)
- [BMC](https://www.biomedcentral.com/)
- [Palgrave Macmillan](https://www.palgrave.com/)
- [Apress](https://www.apress.com/)

- Your privacy choices/Manage cookies
- [Your US state privacy rights](https://www.springernature.com/gp/legal/ccpa)
- [Accessibility statement](https://www.springernature.com/gp/info/accessibility)
- [Terms and conditions](https://link.springer.com/termsandconditions)
- [Privacy policy](https://link.springer.com/privacystatement)
- [Help and support](https://support.springernature.com/en/support/home)
- [Cancel contracts here](https://support.springernature.com/en/support/solutions/articles/6000255911-subscription-cancellations)

49.228.118.39

Not affiliated

[![Springer Nature](/oscar-static/images/logo-springernature-white-19dd4ba190.svg)](https://www.springernature.com/)

© 2024 Springer Nature