premise: Of course , if a researcher tampers with the evidence , making a unilateral , unsupported claim or assumption that a word means something that it does not , then that does not constitute semantic it is what is known as dirty work at the crossroads , and M and S are indulging in a bit of mischief by suggesting that semantic change either has taken place or is taking place because they have some evidence that a certain change in usage had crept in and true is true and true is true and true is true and true is true and true is true .
hypothesis: Researchers sometimes tamper with evidence and incorrectly designate semanticism .