" 
 ::::: The template which you removed () linked to the relevant policy; we always apply WP:V to every article, and even more so when we have secondary independent sources that are almost universally critical of the theory.  Since you removed those templates, well ... better, actually.  The article is written almost entirely from primary sources from the originator of the theory, and all independent, third-party commentary is confined to a ""Criticism"" section, when in fact, most independent sources are critical of the theory.  A neutral article would be based on independent sources, and would not demote the legitimate independent secondary review commentary to a ""criticism"" section.     "