" 
 ::::Relax. ANI existed in India 40,000 years ago, no doubt about that. Reich says ""it's tempting,"" yet it's clear that it's quite unlikely that those ""original ANIs"" spoke an Indo-European language - but hey, that is OR! Anyway, Reich refers to IAmt, but that's not the main point; the main point is that this research is directly related to IAmt (Singh uses it as an argument against it) and the relation of northern Indians to Europeans, and that Reich also refers to IAmt.  - "