" 

 == JpGrB == 

 You need to stop reverting valid edits on this article.  

 *If someone edits in some new info, you have come along and re-worded it because you didn't like the way it was originally typed. 
 : ie The plot that was recently added. 
 *Which brings me to editing a plot synopsis, it's stupid. It has come from the production company and is usually the text printed on the back of the DVD. No one cares if you don't like the way it's set out. 
 *You edit text that others have added so the original meaning is lost 
 :When I added the info about the DVD/BD release date, I originally had it set out to say to to say that the ""DVD and the first Bluray in the series history would be release on...."" but you changed it to ""For the first time in the series history, the episode will be released simultaneously on DVD and Blu-ray"" which implies that there has been previous BD releases, but wasn't released the same time as the DVD. 
 * You make up rules to justify your edits/reversions.  
 : Retailers are valid sources for DVD/BD release dates, they get the information from the distributor who gets it's from the production company. Using your logic, any DVD that is not confirmed in a press release (since you also regard fan-sites as invalid) is not allowed to be mentioned on Wikipedia until the DVD has actually been released. They are accepted across many other TV show articles. 
 : You've named Twitter an unreliable source. Even if the Tweets that are being used as a reference are coming from accounts that are confirmed to be Seth MacFarlane or Kara Vallows. Information from these tweets may not have a ""proper"" source for many, many months resulting in missing information that could have been present. Again, tweets are accepted on other articles given the account is confirmed. 

 Get over yourself and accept the fact this article is going to be 100% the way you want it to be. I will make sure I revert any stupid edits you make from now on."