" 
 ::The article is problematic. It is supposedly about the historic railway and then veers off into the train of today which is not known as the ""Jaffa Jerusalem railway."" There is no reason  for that Iran comparison tp be in the lead (and it was not ""Iran"" at the time either, but Persia). I don't know what MOS is, but the article is definitely more comprehensible and encyclopedic now. It was a mess. If your interest is in improving articles, I would think carefully before you revert. Best, Gila  "