" 

 == Is this article blocked to keep the idiots out or the idiots in? == 

 At the moment the recent crash is reported in the incident table as: 
 :A car carrying 16 passengers collided with an empty stationary car on the track traveling approximately 20 mph (32 km/h) 
 ""an empty stationary car on the track traveling (sic) approximately 20 mph (32 km/h)"" 
 First how on earth can a stationary car be travelling 20mph? Plain English please!! Surely it should read: 
 :A car carrying 16 passengers ""that was traveling approximately 20 mph (32 km/h)"" collided with an empty stationary car on the track. 
 But as usual on here when you have too many cooks you get the aforementioned crap. 

 Second in attempt to be succinct - there are too many clauses introduced into the sentence, subject, speed, location, object etc. It's like a mouth with too many teeth. A mumble of information. 

 Third ""traveling"" is the American spelling, the British word has ""ll"". So immediately I think it's mostly like that an American speller wrote that tripe in an article on a British subject. Keep the Websters' English lite on the other side of the Atlantic. 

 Furthermore there is no mention that there were four casualties, currently the wording of the incident suggests there were more seriously injured than just the four - it implies as many as all 16 passengers could have ""Serious neck, chest, and leg injuries"" which is not the case. 

 :Sigh: Wikipedia written by people who shouldn't even - by a long stretch of the imagination - be ever considered ""editors"".  "