" 

 Thanks for the explanation- Sorry, I am still trying to learn the source codes. Is there a way to send you an article without it going live first? I saw something about a sandbox, but didn't know exactly where that goes. Could I send it to you?  

 What prevents certain groups from planting editors to search and destroy or write slanted articles? Our study (12 airline captains) discovered a report which identified an entirely different group as the 911 masterminds but most of that report was immediately classified. The report is listed in a confusing way and it lacks the meat of the intelligence. I would like to site several passages but its on a pdf- We believe that these passages have been intentionally hidden after 158 pages of fluff and stuff. Any suggestions on how to display the meaty portions first- about 30 pages within a 850 page report? 

 Lastly, its almost comical how KSM came to be the 911 mastermind in the media. We've been following this closely. At the beginning he was the alleged mastermind and after repeating that a thousand times, it just evolved into common knowledge. There's so much wrong with that assertion that we wrote two chapters on it in False Flag 911. In the article on 911 there are assertions that have evolved into convictions by omitting ""alleged."" How can this be allowed without a trial (or charges) and how can this be corrected?  

 Thanks again! 
 Msy2fla-   "