":ironically enough, i've just been fixing the article on argumentum ad populum, so there's no safety in numbers, even on wikipedia. (not meaning to start a fight, just perhaps quell a little overzealousness on the part of a perhaps bored admin-type; i'm all for making the wikipedia ""better"", but ""more inclusive"" is a better form of ""better"" than ""more anal"" is, imo).   

 "