":In addition, I would like to point out one of your fallacies. Quote: ""a real Christian (who only wants to love and care for the welfare of the people in the name of charity) is in danger of being judged by Kony’s self styled interpretation of Christianity, instead of by its true followers."" What is a ""real Christian""? What defines a real Christian? Are the crusaders who massacred Muslims during the Crusades not ""real Christians""? When European powers bombarded port cities in Asia during the 17th century under the argument that they should ""bring the word of the Lord to these heathen barbarian lands"" (as something various British and American commodores have written in their memos), are these people not ""real Christians""? I think you're attempting on twisting the definition of ""Christian"" here.  | —  email  

 "