" 
 :Rob, I did read what you said before, but I'm not simply being shallow and reading only what you typed above, I'm taking EVERYTHING in this discussion into account; concerns about using this article for price comparisons have come up before, and since the answers aren't apparently to your liking, you're bringing them up AGAIN. 
 :Garrett, I'm going to have to respectfully disagree with you; given that there's a few other people here in favor of keeping the points and only one against, I'd say that keeping the current version in the favor of the one present (and the others who decided to stop discussing it) is not consensus, especially when it has been stated time and again after the article was locked without the point values being included that it was not an endorsement of the current version.  Right now, there's only one or two people who were in favor of keeping the points that ""accepted"" this so-called compromise, if only to stop the edit warring while the discussion went on; I'd hardly call that a ""compromise"".  That aside, the people in favor of keeping the points are trying to justify to the one person that still did stay in this discussion why the points should stay (which, we really don't need to do at this point, since we shouldn't be considering the needs of the many over the wants of the few).  Only one person has had a consistent problem with the points being in the article, and given the way things have been going, he'll just continue to debate it until he gets the result he wants.  "