Perfect, I was just about to suggest making a footnote on that. Re whether this is a sourced interpretation, I appreciate the irony and hope Qed237 will take note of it )) . On the one hand, this looks to me as the only plausible interpretation. On the other hand, this very fact speaks against having a clarification at all. Anyway, I believe that since questions have been raised as to the clarity of the official wording, a clarification wouldn't do any harm and would only help readers.