"::::Re .  Checkuser is not a final result.  That is shown that someone uses the same IP does not mean that it is the same editor.  Blocks are to be preventive, not punative, and hence, when a user is discussing and trying to help, I assume good faith, see that Mistro12's edits are almost solely to talkspace before the block (except for a (double) hit in the abusefilter and one other edit, IIRC.   
 ::::Again, Mistro12's identity has been established off-wiki through the unblock mailing list channel, and they has stated on wiki that their job (and seen the organisations they does work for I also believe that) makes them work on site, and it certainly looks like they was working in the University IP range when doing the edits.  Though Mistro12 is certainly very close to the organisation, and has been in contact, I do not believe they is A. Mithani.  I assume good faith on Mistro12, and (per WP:BOLD/WP:IAR) suggested him to try and see where they got, and that found strong (almost violent) opposition, continuing bad faith assumptions on his identity, chilling remarks, remarks close to threats to him and others, and remarks close to bad faith assumptions on others in discussions.  It even feels bitey towards Mistro12. 
 ::::I am still worried, that while for Living People we should try to make neutral articles (however positive or negative the real live of a person is), with Existing Organisations we insist to keep the dirt, and not give a restart of a company the benefit of the doubt (it does by the way involve living people who are running the company now, and often even for the past companies), assume good faith on the fresh intentions, and try to keep it neutral.  The power of advertising your company on Wikipedia is immense, but so is the opposite, what can happen here is that a good faith restart of a company gets negatively affected by Wikipedia. 
 ::::A split is apparently out of the question (my attempt in discussing that possibility was shot down effectively).  I must say, I have not often encountered articles which have gone to this level (it is either downright advertising and gets deleted, or it is a good regular company and gets a neutral article in the end), but I do see merit in Mistro12's original questioning of this type of situation.      

 "