", thus just another distraction. 

 :Captain Occam's gaming npov to spindoctor sourced claims: This euphemism to disguise what's an extensive discussion given in the source about justifications of segregation and discrimination against blacks; this which misrepresents the source, and this misapplication of a primary source to contradict a secondary source (misapplication because the primary source is making a different claim-that from a key study Jensen concluded the compensatory Head Start program was ineffective-and Captain Occam infers a ""novel conclusion"" from it-that the Head Start study's outcomes motivated Jensen to became a hereditarian). 

 ===Misdiagnosis of the problem=== 
 Articles this controversial are challenging.  David.Kane and Captain Occam were relatively inexperienced dealing with the complexities of policy and conflict resolution before coming to it, and this along with their skewed eye towards sources and claims requires a lot of hand-holding and babysitting from the community at every stage.  Solutions like these   don't get at the root of the problem. Neither would using BLP to require our coverage of scientific studies be smothered with ruby-red lipstick kisses when their authors are alive. Editors who can't work in these articles without the help of ""tribal alliances"", guard rails and/or full-time admin supervision shouldn't edit them, period."