" 

 ===Specific BLP issues=== 

 In re-reading this article earlier today, I noticed a few issues which I think might represent undue weight or trivia, which we could probably lose. They were not added by myself but appear to have been added to the article fairly recently. I've not taken them out myself but am bringing them here for discussion so that we can find a consensus on what to do about them. If other editors have issues of concern, please post them below so that we can address them too. 

 ;1) Under ""Entrepreneurship"": 

 Monckton and his wife opened Monckton's, a high-end shirt shop in King's Road, Chelsea, in 1995'. 

 While this is reliably sourced it looks very trivial and I've not seen any mention of it anywhere else. I suggest leaving this out. 

 ;2) Under ""Political views"": 

 Monckton's CV [32]  as Chief Policy Adviser at the Science and Public Policy Institute (SPPI) claims that ""the correction of a table inserted by IPCC bureaucrats... earned him the status of Nobel Peace Laureate."" In January 2010, Monckton voiced this claim on an Australian radio broadcast. When later questioned about this by reporters [33], Monckton conceded that his claim to have won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2007 was ""a joke"". As of 6 June 2010, the claim that Monckton is a Nobel Peace Laureate has not been removed from the SPPI web site 

 This strikes me as a relatively trivial issue and I suggest that this is undue weight. The last sentence of it is clearly unsourced and appears to be original research. At the very least, WP:BLP requires that to be removed. 

 ;3) Under ""Social and economic policy"": 

 Criticizing the campaign to save the Ravenscraig  ironworks, Monckton wrote, ""The Scots are subsidy junkies whingeing like crumpled bagpipes and waiting for a fix of English taxpayers' money."" 

 In 1997, Monckton criticized works at the Fotofeis (the Scottish International Festival of Photography) and Sensation as ""feeble-minded, cheap, pitiable, exploitative sensationalism perpetrated by the talent-free and perpetuated by over-funded, useless, muddle-headed, middle-aged, pot-bellied, brewer's-droopy quangoes which a courageous Government would forthwith cease to subsidise with your money and mine."" 

 Again this seems to me to be undue weight on comments which lack any context and appear to have been selected to make Monckton look bad. There is no indication of wider significance; it looks very much like cherry-picking. Suggest removal of both of these bits.    "