" 

 *The Program on International Policy Attitudes (PIPA) published a report in the Winter 2003-2004 issue of Political Science Quarterly, that viewers of the Fox Network local affiliates or Fox News were more likely than the viewers of other networks to hold these three views which the authors labeled as misperceptions: (PDF),        
 ** 67% believed that the ""US has found clear evidence in Iraq that Saddam Hussein was working closely with the al Qaeda terrorist organization"".  However, the more specific misperception that ""Iraq was directly involved in September 11"" was held by 33% of CBS viewers and only 24% of the viewers of the various Fox sources.  
 ** 33% believed that the ""US has found Iraqi weapons of mass destruction"" ""since the war ended"". 
 ** 35% believed that ""the majority of people"" from all over the world ""favour the US having gone to war"" with Iraq. 

 :::'''There is nothing in this one which is not in the peer reviewed study, so how can a no original research objection be raised to it?  It is closer to the raw data than the proposal by Crazie, since it doesn't bind already questionable basic data into a meta-analysis, but just lets the facts speak for themselves.  Perhaps you object to the CBS datum being interjected into the first ""misperception"", but if you read the paper that is exactly the section in which it is discussed, I don't recall it in the non-peer reviewed version, so it looks like the peer reviewers got to see the raw data, and did not allow the seletive publishing of only those results where the Fox percentages were the highest.  "