" 

 == No original research == 

 I've removed a passage to the effect that 'the author is not an academic; that's why he makes a lot of mistakes'.  The list of errors that follows (primarily gathered by Wikipedians, one must presume, rather than by the critics alluded to in the passage) is obviously designed to advance that argument.  Accordingly, rather than add a 'citation needed' tag, it seemed appropriate to delete that passage, as being contrary to the No original research policy.  That policy covers text that 

 ""... introduces an analysis or synthesis of established facts, ideas, opinions, or arguments in a way that builds a particular case favored by the editor, without attributing that analysis or synthesis to a reputable source"" 

 One might also question whether the list of errors itself amounts to research or not.  There are few sources given for the factual assertions, and no sources given for the identification of the errors... 
  "