::::Jose may have been discussed in the past, but that does not mean that the chapter cannot be opened again. His work is largely an opinion editorial but at the same time it is also an investigate report (and by definition, a primary source), which disqualifies it for use on this article.  The opinion piece also makes exceptional claims and relies on several unnamed sources and is written by an author is is neither an established journalist or an expert on the life of Narendra Modi. 
 ::::You are misrepresenting my views and not for the first time.  The biographical article may rely on sources that are established and prominent publications including TIME magazine and other national and regional media sources. However, it will be up to us editors to determine which are the most prominent and objective sources on the subject.  The rationale behind the addition of 'economic development' was that it would balance the 'controversy' portion made in the same paragraph.  Now you are proposing that the portion on economic development should be balanced further by adding critical views of other commentators.  That is not very ingenious.   
 ::::As proposed above, we should be mainly concerned about presenting factual and objective information about the subject of the article rather than riddling the whole biography with commentaries from every other journalist in the country simply because they were featured in Firstpost or the Times of India.  There are several examples that can be drawn from featured articles on politicians around the world as I have demonstrated above. —  {}