" 

 == wikiproject discrimination == 

 i have removed the tagging for wikiproject discrimination based on this rationale: 

 white pride is not inherently racist, nor is black, brown, gay or purple pride. 

 however, if i was to give the leniency to reach as far as white pride was racist then it is just that, racist. 
 :racism does not equal discrimination. 

 save the wikiproject for those that actively discriminate, those who advocate sitting in the back of the bus, and those who adhere to affirmative action. discrimination is an ACTIVE aggression. racism is not. it is entirely plausible to adhere to the doctrine that one would be racist, without ever discriminating. in business, certain managers may be inherently racist, but will promote those who suit the greater need of the company, regardless of beliefs. most people harbor prejudices, and most people do not act on them. and this is even under the assumption that white pride is a racist belief. i have been told that the inclusion in this project is because white pride, unlike black pride, implies racism. then the fallacy is not the belief, but in the article itself. 

 if we are to assume that pride=racism=discrimination then we are far-reaching. i take pride in my blue eyes, but i could give a shit about the pigmentation of others. in this case, the article needs purging, not inclusion. 

 how ironic that wikiproject discrimination is quoted as such: White pride is a term generally used to imply racism, while black pride usuaully does not imply racism.  That, in itself, is discriminatory. in fact, it's quite sad that those who consider themselves quite adept at this project assert 'generally' and 'imply' as facts. they are weasel words. 14 words should be read over, and over, and over, until it is understood that it is not racist - but it is racial. there is a huge difference.   "