" 

 == Philately categories == 

 Hello, thanks for your message and my apologies for confusion caused.  I'm still quite new and I must admit I haven't got around to scanning new articles yet so I hadn't realised that people might be misled by a title if they didn't know its context. 

 I've made a note to review the categorisation of the micro reference articles as soon as I can find time, but I'll have to ask you to bear with me for a few days as time is short. 

 One thing I can't agree with you about is renaming the category to begin with the word ""list"" as this would lose the profile of the category.  There are already several lists in the philately section and I contend that my work is more than a list.  It is built on the Britannica model of A-Z micro references.  Many are complete in micro form, as where there is a text addition to the date, currency, etc. summary.  Others will have a link to a ""macro"" article (e.g., Abu Dhabi which is finished as a pilot case).  But what differentiates the work mostly from other philatelic lists is that it includes numerous ancillary references wherefrom a link is need to the controlling reference elsewhere (e.g., stamp issuers sometimes use alternate names in their inscriptions and overprints). 

 But thanks for the advice which is very useful and I will get around to it as soon as I can.  I've added it to my 1001 Things To Do! 

 All the best.   "