" 

 == Conservapedia == 

 Conservapedia can sometimes be a valuable resource, but overall I agree with your assessment that it represents a particular narrow range of viewpoints rather than mainstream American conservatism.  I also suspect you're right that nearly no serious intellectuals do business there.  When Conservapedia first launched, I predicted they would close down within 6 months.  They're still around, to my dismay, and their continued existence helps feed the increasingly widespread belief not that Wikipedia is too liberal but that conservatives cannot win fair arguments and must therefore depend on a heavily restricted and censored medium to survive.    / "