"::::::: The apparent bias through omission, implied above, is wholly consistent with the fact that the History section of the article mentions the word ""slaves"" just once, merely in passing, and without any reference whatsoever; while the word ""slavery"" is similarly mentioned just once, also just in passing and without citation). Whereas, in historical fact, slavery played a very substantial part in the country's history. I need convincing this article is not biased, perhaps even racist, in its omissions. But that's just me.    

 "