" 
 :::::::::::::::Formal statements given by a sitting PM has more value than anything else. - no, actually it doesn't. At best it's just a primary source for ... the sitting PM's opinions. It's certainly not a reliable source for any statements of fact. Historians and scholars opinions, as noted above by  for the purposes of an encyclopedia. 
 :::::::::::::::It's like the Saudi King saying that every Saudi desired bringing down the Twin Towers! - no, actually it's nothing like that. You're just making shit up. 
 :::::::::::::::If that had been the case, guys like you would have been the first ones to make it part of Wikipedia - I resent that you think who or what ""guys like me"" are or would do. You're making a stupid assumption which only betrays your own prejudices. 
 :::::::::::::::This gives us an insight into Mr Modi's mind and his way of governing. - no, actually it does nothing of the kind. Anyway, please read WP:OR. And after you've read that, read it again. And after you've read it again, read WP:PRIMARY. Then read WP:OR again. Then ask someone to explain it to you just in case. 
 :::::::::::::::We should not be surprised if it is because of this Mr Modi's past that a future war between India and Pakistan takes place. - Huh? Ummm, first, WP:NOTAFORUM, second, this statement is just nutzoid. 
 :::::::::::::::And so on. Oh, also, putting things in bold does not make them magically true. And when you put half your comment in bold it sort of defeats the point (which is to emphasize).  "