" 

  
 == Barbara Schwarz article fuddlemark reverted my edit== 

 I reverted your edit because it was a) redundant, and b) unencyclopædic.  For 'a', Ms Schwarz's still being a Scientologist is covered in the opening paragraph, so you don't need to create a new section just to say ""she's a Scientologist"".  As for 'b', section headings like ""What Scientology doesn't want you to know"" are contrary to Wikipedia:Neutral point of view and entirely the wrong tone to use for an encyclopædia. 

 Does that make sense?      

 :No, fuddlemark, not so much. Because you see, a) it is covered once in the opening paragraph that she considers herself being a scientologist. And then it is covered three times, that she is not a scientologist: ""kicked out"", ""not a member"", ""no longer active"" - three times it says the very same thing yet in contradiction to the before said fact, that she is a scientologist. b) That is a pity, that headings like ""What Scientology does not want you to know"" are the wrong tone for wikipedia. I wonder only because a content like that: ""According to Schwarz, these events were the result of a conspiracy by a group called the 'Still Existing German Nazi Psychiatrists Mindcontroller Secret Service' (SEGNPMSS)."" is the right tone. ??? Explain this to me, please.  "