"I WAS NOT CHEATING You wrote in your edit comment Reverting Bahai cheats and deceptions. Browne's mention of ""exile"" is about Ottoman government having sent him to Bahji not about Persian government having sent him to exile. You knew this damn well. 

 I must say, I'm more than a little upset with this.  First, I know no such thing.  I read the Browne material, and it surely and positively looks to me as tho the persian official was talking about the Exiles.  Now,  you assert (without evidense, as a matter of fact, without argumentation or justification, that the persian official was refering to the Baha'is in a future sense as ""those about to become exiles when we send them off to Acca.""   This looks like a very weird and twisted reading to me.  Further, I take great exception to being called a cheat, and deceitful.  I have spent nearly twenty years working with those who hate the Baha'i Faith and those who love it attempting to provide a neutral forum for that discussion.  I brought the same sensibitlity to the wikipedia.  Your personal attacks are inappropriate.  If you have some scholar who contends that Baha'u'llah was not exiled, bring him forward.   Otherwise, EVERY ENGLISH SOURCE says ""banished"" or ""exiled"".  If you have a PERSIAN source who says Baha'u'llah ran away waving his hands in the air and screaming like a girl,  BRING THAT ON.   But quit sticking your PRESUMPTIONS of what happened in.  The absense of documentation does NOT mean that there is an absense of action.   You may asset it all you want, but that doesn't change the reality.    

 "