== 11:review of submission by 5.144.156.186 == 

  
 Not sure why this was rejected and not considered 'notable' or the citations were not reliable? 

 To reiterate, the Hyman Archive has the Guinness World Record for 'Largest Collection Of Magazines' and this has been verified, officially recognised and certified by Guinness themselves.    
 That citation was used on the draft: 
 http://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/world-records/largest-collection-of-magazines/ 

 There are other citations, for example the reputable, established, notable, PPA (Professional Publishers Asscociation) are supporting the project: 
 http://www.ppa.co.uk/news/blog/ppa/2014/6/hyman-archive-plan-digitise-worlds-largest-collection-magazines/ 

 Other citations include: 
 Hypebeast: 
 http://hypebeast.com/2012/4/the-james-hyman-pop-culture-magazine-archive 

 If you see the video at http://www.hymanarchive.com, you will also note, many industry 'notables' talking about the archive and supplying testimonials. 

 So, as all of the above, unsure why this draft was rejected?