" 

 ::What you just said is perfectly reasonable, so you go ahead with the proposed changes: ""See also"", ""Further reading"", ""General information"" and ISBN template.  I see nothing wrong with any of that, so we have consensus. 
 ::*Verbatim restoration of reverted material is consistent with WP:BRD and apparent WP:VANDAL, and was not intended to be rude or any kind of in your face confrontation.  The modified list was not verbatim, it was a response to inline template request for ""example"" of scholarly discussions. 
 ::*WP:Link rot says that the one who causes dead links (creation of empty ""see..."" references by removal of the referenced section/s) is responsible for cleaning them up.  The length of the article made the internal links to parts of it convenient for the reader, and now some of them have been made into useless annoyances producing no results (appearing like one form of WP:VANDTYPES: Blanking, illegitimate), which makes the encyclopedia look bad.  You have some work to do. 
 ::*WP:EL states: 
 :::""Some acceptible links include those that contain further research that is accurate and on-topic."" 
 :::—You admitted that some of what was reverted contained further research that is accurate and on-topic. 

 ::I'll meanwhile go ahead and partly resequence the list of Biblical Translations, on the basis of your own suggestion to group them by how they render the translation of the word תחשים, and still keep the current basic historical order 21st century back to BCE 3rd century. 

 ::I'll access the Bibref site for on-line accessible Tanakh versions that use tachash, tachashim, including those that have no English text (Masoretic). The article would show the most recent works using ""tahash/tachash skins"" and ""blue skins"" for orot tehasim without establishing any kind of conclusion that they are the best or most accurate translations.  (Could include nb-footnote pointing out, ""The fact that these are the most recent translations should not be taken as evidence or proof that these are the best or most accurate translations."") 
 
 ::I'll contact the WP:WikiProject Bible site asking members if there is any source for image/s of the Samaritan Torah text of Exodus 25:5 we might download, to establish for the reader one way or the other whether the yud/yodt is included in this earliest pre-Masoretic exemplar of the Hebrew text.  (It wouldn't be OR but an illustration of statements in Gesenius' Hebrew Grammar § 30 regarding ""lack of matres lectionis before 10th century BCE."")  An image of that''''' would really be interesting!  And if there is an on-line accessible text of the Samaritan Torah, that would be a useful link.  If there is, and it can't be linked from the article, a notation in the article could be provided (a footnote, or a suggestion to the reader) that it can be found on-line. 

 ::  "