" 

 == Main Trends? == 

 The four ""main trends"" here seem to be missing something big:  theistic Satanism.   

 Sat/Tan being a main trend seems iffy.  Other than Tani Jantsang's and possibly HR Vad's group, I've never seen it espoused as a major philosophy by anyone else.  It's vaguely related in the ""becoming""/""being"" bit to the Setian ""xeper"" philosophy.  But a main trend based on 1-2 groups?  That's stretching. 

 Setian Satanism is debatable, since the Temple of Set did indeed orginate from the CoS, but tends to distance itself from the Satanism label as being too narrow and counterproductive in its semantic baggage.  But it's definitely one of the main LHP ""trends"", so I can see it's place here. 

 But where's ""theistic Satanism?""  I've already read the arguments about ""modern"" vs. ""traditional"" and I can agree there, but it seems very incomplete to mention something as relatively obscure as the Dark Doctrines and yet make no mention that, alongside the atheistic and nontheistic versions of Satanism there are indeed theistic non-Christian Satanists running around.  Some of the ""other forms"" MIGHT be theistic, but nothing is actually said regarding that.  It should at least be *acknowledged,* even if it requires it own Wiki entry for the details (as does LaVeyan Satanism). 

 I feel that's a large hole in this article and gives the reader an incomplete and skewed view of the religion/philosophy."