" 

 ::::It was unduly provocative to do what you did, straight off a yearlong ban, i.e. walk in, throw out the lead, which has been written and rewritten several times, as per talk, and throw in your own personal text, unsourced, with material copied from Amadeus. You also removed large blocks of material that were impeccably sourced, in what looks more like WP:IDONTLIKEIT rather than respect for WP:NPOV. So, be a little more careful in future, and, I suggest, use the talk page more often. A large number of people have read the page over the past month, and very few objections have been raised to sourced material you summarily deleted.    

 :::::I edited according to WP:FILMLEAD, which the editors seem to be ignoring. Now, I'm not sure why in heaven you think just because some material or other is ""sourced"" then it must be in an article. Its all cherry picking isn't it? Anyhow, to repeat - check out WP:FILMLEAD, then check out 300 (film), then look at my edits and the edit summary provided. If you then have questions, let me know.  In the meantime I've changed out ""loosely"" for ""fictionalized"" (as per the article I just recommended.) I reformatted the information as per policy.  But I left in the giant out-of-weight plot synopsis to show you how out of place it is. Ta.   "