"== Pull-ups == 
 I don't understand what is wrong with the links in Pull-up_(exercise)? All you tell me is ""no and no""? I looked through the guidelines and it says that sites ""that fail to meet criteria for reliable sources yet still contain information about the subject of the article from knowledgeable sources"". The article didn't contain the information I linked. what is wrong with that? 

 I also explained on the talk page and you didn't answer there. Why do you do this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by     
 : Read the blurb at the top of the page. It's there so I don't have to explain WP:EL ten times a day.    

 == What do you mean? == 

 Uh, I'm not understanding what you said to me, what was the problem with the 1996 arrest on Charlie Sheen's page? I found and/or searched to find these sources, so just write me back to make things clear. Thanks.   
 : Lawyer blogs clearly do not meet WP:Reliable sources policies.  Read the policy link, please.    

 ==Request Unblock== 
 Hello 
 please could you unblock the user purpler0ckofficialas i really want the account back, i have understood what i did wrong and it was right to block me but please could yo unblock it. i have read all the pages 
 Thanks 
 The rightfull owner of purpler0ckofficial  — Preceding unsigned comment added by     
 {{unblock|I have learned my lesson and i was angry and will never do it again}} 

 : You need to request an unblock at ; see here for info on requesting to be unblocked.    
 *You beat me to the punch on the block. Glad to see you weren't really blocked, I was surprised to see your name at Category:Requests for unblock!    

 == Act neutrally == 

 I removed the sentence calling Nairs as dogs because it is taken from a well known anti-Nair source. There is not a single other source supporting that view. Why the hell you are acting in such a biased manner?    
 : You received a final warning for making a personal attack in an edit summary.  Anything remotely resembling an attack in the future will result in your account being blocked.    

 == Removed contribution == 

 Just curious as to why you removed my addition to the 'sexual positions' article? I know it was unsourced, but i have been looking for acceptable sources to add. also why did you say ""thanks for experimenting with wikipedia""? although i rarely edit, i have been with wikipedia for 5 years, and was certainly not experimenting.     — Preceding unsigned comment added by   •    
 : I simply used the standard warning template, Template:uw-test1.    

 I dont understand, why did i get a warning?  
 : Because the addition was unsourced, and not even really a position.  The article is not an arbitrary list of every conceivable sex act. I'm not discussing it here further. Find a source or move on. [[User:Ohno