" 
 :Most people focus on the first few words, pyramid style. So the first word is most critical, the second a bit less, and so on. In this case, given that we have an existing official WP:PSTS policy which we don't want confused with any proposed guideline with a similar name, it is imperative that the first few words be as distinct as possible from the policy. Therefore, starting the name with ""Handling"" helps, since it immediately tells the editor that this is a ""How to"" type page, vs. a possible core policy or guideline. Again, our goal is to prevent confusion, and the first part of the name is critical. Crum375 (talk)  posted on  
 ::That is a nice theory, and I know SlimVirgin would agree with you on it.  But why is this now deemed to be the consensus that I must argue against.  No one brought up the idea of moving the page from Wikipedia:Primary, secondary and tertiary sources before SlimVirgin renamed it.  Surely some consensus should have been reached for that?    "