" 

 == Gabor Racz == 

 You know, Doc - a BLP isn't a journal entry.  It's a biography.  Why do you want it to read like a science paper?  It's one thing to create dry scientific articles about drugs and such, but this is a BLP.  FA criteria clearly states: ""its prose is engaging, even brilliant, and of a professional standard;""  That doesn't mean dry and scientific.  Your addition of the template with an edit summary that reads, ""this article has serious issues"" isn't very helpful.  Why don't you point out the issues instead of templating a GA article?  Your the medical professional or is there a reason you are refraining from editing and trying to improve this BLP?  📧 "