" 

  
 ==Stop your revert warring== 

 It is the wording of the scientist as the sentence begins with ""Edward claimed..."". So, plagarism charges are stupid at best. The fact that it is not in quotes is a simple mistake, not ""stealing his ideas"".    

 Oh and what you did was a revert, since you reverted the part about Edwards.  Your edits here  were minor as well so you didnt need to revert here . If you had listened your own advice and had ""not revert the whole f*** article"", none of this would happen. 

 And I didnt call you a vandal. I said ""reverting vandalism"", please learn to read properly. 

 Also, you've been reported Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Admin_Attention_PLEASE  "