"::If I was a bad person I would say that this mostly sounds like a load of near-lying, semi-confused, track-covering cr*p from a company that is having difficulty admitting that it screwed up. But at least they do concede that ""the detail could perhaps be misinterpreted"" (or is garbage, as we say in English) and we will no doubt see it amended by the end of the next decade, or so. Well done you for getting an answer out of them, shame on them that it's so pathetic, and one and a half cheers that they've sort-of skirted round the edge of admitting that they were, er, wrong and it needs fixing and it might be right one day. Ooops ... I'm now in danger of behaving like this is a forum, and should stop! ) Cheers,    

 "