" 

 ==Disruptive edits== 

 The material I added to Cyrillic was directly taken from a standard philological source.  I added back the mention about Denisona after she decidedas a ""lone wolf"" authorityto undo my proper edit. 

 Do y'all have nothing better to do than concoct problems that don't exist and then threaten contributors about them?  I see that, in many other cases, nothing but a generic ""This article has issues with unsourced material"" warning is slapped up, butwhen I cite chapter and versesome wacko complains about it. 

 Please respond in ADULT. THOUGHTFULLY ARGUED fashion. 

   "