:There is disagreement over where to put the incident (and which bits are notable). I see the place for the incident as under the company, and agree with Masem that the company article needs to avoid smearing people involved with the company (obviously). There are a number of different viewpoints, including TheRedPenofDoom's view that the coverage of the incident strays too far into interpreting maritime law. But I fear by moving the ship article to be about the incident they've made it about the incident, which I believe should be the least of the 3 (unless and until it does revolutionize the field(s) of maritime law, Coast Guard patrolling, and/or piracy). What I would otherwise have done is stubbed the ship article and made it all dry and technical. However, I'm not sure I have the cheek to accept the AfC myself and then cover the incident there myself, especially since that's probably very much not what the AfC submitter wants. And to a lesser extent because I would then have a responsibility to watch the thing at least 18 hours a day for BLP violations. Hmm. I may write the other article first and hope some Indian newspaper does a nice write-up on the ship itself to fill the news hole.