":::I think that the ""Political identity"" section you made is more appropriate for an article such as sexual abstinence or celibacy as it is about rejecting sexuality rather than not having it to begin with. Flyer22 is correct that your time would be better spent addressing the concerns I listed in the GA review page.  

 :::Also, about GA reviews, you should not nominate an article for GA review unless: 1) You believe the article is as good as you can get it to be and you have taken care of all the details beforehand, 2) You have the time and are prepared to address all the problems that the reviewer finds. It is true that you can submit an article for GA review multiple times, but to submit an article if you know it will probably fail or still needs a lot of work is a disservice to the GA process as it creates more work for volunteers like me. If you are not sure if an article is good enough for GA status, you should first ask for a WP:peer review or make a request on a relevant WikiProject (such as WP:WikiProject Sexuality). I hope you use this as a learning process for future articles.    

 "