"Airliner vs Aircraft== 

 Why feel the need to revert my edit? there is nothing wrong with using the term aircraft. You will find in allot of countries including the United Kingdom that the word airliner is hardly ever used. Many people are not familiar with the term. 

 If you think its not an necessary edit why feel the name to change? 

    

 :*Look here, the onus is on you to prove that there is indeed a need to change the name, and most certainly not on me when the previous version was working just fine until you came along. Also, as I've given my explanation in the edit summary whilst reverting you, Airliners is a very specific descriptive term whereas Aircraft is a generic term. If you disagree, raise a consensus building dialogue. Thoughts?    
 ::*Listen, before i start, there is no need to take that attitude at all. I havent spoke to your scarasticaly so why do you feel the need? When you say it was fine until i came along, it still makes sense with the word replaced. The word aircraft is a term used more than the word airliner outside the USA. This is why i feel the need to use it here. Something to look at, the article in question uses the word aircraft 34 times and the word airliner is used twice.     

 :::*Don't play the victim with me here, this edit of yours on my talk page is hardly confidence inspiring when you say that you haven't been sarcastic to me in the first place. Secondly, I reverted you the first time round on the basis of WP:AGF and that is being said and done without any prejudice towards you but what about the explanation you gave in the revert edit summary to me the first time round? Seems to everybody here it is a tit-for-tat thing that you're doing, eh? Lastly, go click and read on Airliner and Aircraft, the reason why the former was chosen for that section is pretty much self-explanatory. Lastly, keep all your discussion here and stay off my talk page, you are not welcome because you have no respect for others when you don't read their notes first before you post there. Adieu~!    

 ::::As a sanity check, this is an article about an airline, airliner seems more appropriate.  I find the push to substitute the generic term aircraft bizarre.  Why?     

 :::::*WCM, you tell me.    

 ::::::*What a wrote on your talk page i stick by. I put that there to ask why i was  being ignored. I had a genuine question, you deleted it and never got back. As for the reason for the edit i didn't intend to cause offence. The reason you give was  ""Not Necessary edit"" so my thinking was if it wasn't necessary surely its not necessary to revert? maybe we just both have different ideas of the definition of necessary? Anyway i wish to apologize i didnt intend to cuase upset.    

 :::::::*Read Help:Edit conflict, its very elementary. Nuff said~!    

 =="