" 
 ==== 
 {{unblock|reason===Undercite or oversight?== 
 Regarding the currently misleading citation [1] at Van Rensselaer (surname): 
 :^ U.S. Government Printing Office Style Manual; Chapter 3 - Capitalization Rules; Rule 3.14: ""In anglicized names such particles are usually capitalized...but individual usage...should be followed."" 

 I'm not certain if this was overlooked. but on that exact same page is a 100% contradiction to the assertion made in the article. Much to my surprise a rather strange co-incidence compounds my fact based edits to the degree that the US government page to which the citation refers clearly mentions in paragraph 3.13 a certain individual that happens to be listed in the Van Rensselaer (surname) article. As I stated in the 3O board (paraphrase), 'Just because a person constantly see extant examples throughout history (edit comment as he changed Margaret): 
 *Van Rensselaer (surname)‎; 21:02 . . (0)‎ . . ‎Kraxler (talk | contribs)‎ (→‎List of people with the surname Van Rensselaer: the faculty biography spells Van capitalized) 
 *(Move log); 19:16 . . Kraxler (talk | contribs) moved page Henry K. van Rensselaer to Henry K. Van Rensselaer ‎(all sources spell capital V) 
 *(Move log); 15:49 . . Kraxler (talk | contribs) moved page Nicholas van Rensselaer (military figure) to Nicholas Van Rensselaer (military figure) ‎(all sources spell capital V in ""Van"", according to American usage) 
 *(Move log); 13:41 . . Kraxler (talk | contribs) moved page Philip van Rensselaer (author) to Philip Van Rensselaer (author) ‎(corrected) 
 *(Move log); 13:38 . . Kraxler (talk | contribs) moved page Philip S van Rensselaer to Philip S. Van Rensselaer ‎(corrected spelling, and added dot, per MoS)- dont forget to change that v 
 * *Strangely enough, this following edit no longer shows on my watchlist BUT it was just copied from HERE. (please note how there is no compunction to 
 dismissing  (does he really have to be within an hour of every post I PERSONALLY MAKE? does his pattern of following me seem a bit ____?) 
 *16:20, 24 December 2012‎ Kxxxxxr (talk | contribs)‎ . . (8,360 bytes) (-183)‎ . . (→‎External links: wow, this user is quite a bit misguided....) (undo) Is totally uncalled for...JGVR (talk)  

 Habits of improper form can become commonplace to the extent that those habits have been passed down through the generations. Does this now mean disseminating proper form is ""misguided""? (above edit comment) or no longer useful information a researcher that is endeavoring to find facts? To demonstrate Kraxler is most defiantly interested in more than simply CAPS and those pesky little red links, (which by the way are actually encouraged in hopes a person might have enough to start an article.) Kraxler seems so over eager to perfect every article I am involved with, it is pointed out in edit comment: 
 *(Move log); 16:23 . . Kraxler (talk | contribs) moved page Hendrick K van Rensselaer to Hendrick K. Van Rensselaer ‎(I expect this to be moved around a bit more, since none of the sources so far mentioned in the article actually state his name...) 

 Lo and behold the Schenectady article to which I cite has his name in the 3rd paragraph. The history will show that it was not put there after the point was raised. (Though I mistakenly wrote 2nd paragraph on Admin board.) 

 I would bet 1 more day of being blocked: neither Kraxler nor  has ever had any meaningful input on any Anthroponymy page before 3 weeks ago. I mean more than tosing another name on a list. 

 Shall I go into detail how it is physically impossible for any Van Rensselaer (properly capped as stand alone) that has inherited that surname came from one progenitor and how they were members of a church that got guidance from the Netherlands and not the British crown, meaning this nonsense about Anglicized names does not apply here??  
    
 ==Maybe from a newbie== 
 but from an experienced editor; reversing a DAB and no consideration for articles therein: 
 *15:59, 24 December 2012‎ Kraxler (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (4,113 bytes) (0)‎ . . (Kraxler moved page Henry Van Rensselaer to Henry Bell Van Rensselaer over redirect: this is the name given in the congressional bio) (undo) 

 Said editor should be proud of the New York articles they created, I really must wonder why the articles i have contributed to have had ZERO constructive edits with any attempt, just nit-picking with a particular editor. 
 15:59, 24 December 2012‎ Kraxler (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (4,113 bytes) (0)‎ . . (Kraxler moved page Henry Van Rensselaer to Henry Bell Van Rensselaer over redi