" 

 :Maybe it would help to think about the articles we already have, and how they line up with what we might want: 
 :* International Church of Christ [1980 - current] - we have International Churches of Christ; 
 :* Independent Christian Churches/Churches of Christ [1968 - current] - we have Independent Christian Churches/Churches of Christ; 
 :* Churches of Christ (A Capella) [1906 - current] - we have Churches of Christ; 
 :* Church of Christ (Non-Institutional)[1938 (?) - current] - we have The churches of Christ (non-institutional); 

  
 :* Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) [1968 - current] - we have Christian Church (Disciples of Christ), but it's written as 1906 - current; 
 :* Christian Church: Independent and Co-operative [1906-1968] - covered in Christian Church (Disciples of Christ); 
 :* Church of Christ [1820 (?) - 1906] - covered in Restoration Movement, which seems fine for covering the period before the 1906 split; 

 :In my mind, the real question is whether it makes sense to cover the ""Christian Churches: Independent and Co-operative [1906-1968]"" in the same article as the ""Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) [1968 - current]"" as we have it now, or if they should be split out into separate articles.  The current structure of the article, which covers 1906 on through the restructuring and up to today, seems fine to me - but I hadn't understood the 1968 restructuring to be a major break with the past for the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ).  I'll defer to people who know more about the group than I do, but I'd probably still be inclined to leave them in one article, because it doesn't sound like people in the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) thought of the restructuring as a complete break with the past.  But I really don't have a dog in that fight.   "