" 

 ::Well, the successfully would be at odds with NPOV o). Removing the section entirely is unwise. It isn't as if this issue is dead and forgotten: such theories are very much alive on the internet and not mentioning the subject would give the impression that the article simply follows tradition and is naively unaware of the ""new"" revisionist ideas. So it's better to present their essence, indicating that they are generally considered refuted. Also, Zhukov's plan of 15 May must be mentioned somewhere and this is just the place to do it. And it offers a good opportunity to make a connection with that ""doctrine of attacking or rapidly counter-attacking in the event of war"".  "