" 

 == Peer Review 3 (Odexed) == 

 Thanks for assisting in the improvement for the article Odex's actions against file-sharing, and please accept my apologies for the previous lack of response and edits due to dealing with real-life issues. I'm pleased to let you know that the third PR for the article is now up, and looking forward to hearing feedback from you so that it can be brought over to FAC soon. - Best regards,   

 == Is Google Making Us Stupid? == 

 Hey: Still working from your GA review. I just tackled an important portion of it: the section on memory retention. It looks like it will be an important part of Carr's forthcoming book, ""The Shallows: Mind, Memory and Media in an Age of Instant Information"", so I'm glad you pushed me to improve this section. It was definitely, in hindsight, quite pitiful.   
 Hi Sko: Happy holidays. I've addressed all of your points (I think, they are many and I will of course continue to go back to them; and I thank you for them) and I was wondering if you had further points to make? I hope to open up a peer review request soon enough and I would welcome even further comments from you there. I don't think the article is yet FA material but it is heading there, I think.   
 :Hello MS, great work on the review so far. I've just added my initial comments on the Themes and motifs section. Let me know if these nitpicking points are helpful; I had been planning to go through the whole article line-by-line in this fashion, then actually look at the arguments and coverage of the topic itself in the article before examining the article against the GA criteria, but if you're looking to move things along quickly it might be best for me to give a GA review soon. It is becoming an excellent candidate for FA )   
 ::Your reviews are very helpful. I doubt I will get any better at peer review. For some reason, over 400 people were reading the article last Friday () so I'm glad I have ironed out some of the errors. I hope you will continue to help me out. I can't have any mistakes in this article or I will be internationally roasted.   
 :::PS: Please continue to do the full analysis that you intended. I am looking forward to it.   
 ::::I think you could be a professional editor if you have not already been one. I shudder to think how this article might have gone if it weren't for your review. I'm still working on the Themes section but should be finished with everything pretty soon.    

 == Want to apologize == 

 Good morning Skomorokh, we had conversations at .  I am apologizing for the confusion about the category comment and the way I responded to you which was uncivil, at least by the standards I myself require when I comment to other editors.  I do realize that categories cannot be put into articles willy nilly.  I misunderstood your comment apparently and thought you were saying that a reference was required on the category in order to insert it into an article.  I have commented at Verbal's and apologized there for this confusion also but I want to make sure that you saw this so I am repeating it here.  You came off to me as very combative which brought out the bad response from me plus I was tired and have medical problems, but this is no excuse for me to have responded as I did to you.  Please except my apology and explanation if you would though of course you don't have to, it would mean a lot to me to know you understand why I said what I did.  I would like to also disclose that I corrected the spelling of my name as the spelling of Crohn's is kind of like a pet peeve to me.  I hope this was ok to do.  I don't usually adjust other editors comments but I was having trouble typing to you with the knowledge that it was still there! ;)  Anyways, I hope this clears the air and things are ok now.  I take pride in being civil and not being rude to someone or allowing my emotions to take over like it did h