" 

 ::::What are the sources for this ""condemnation""? I admit that I opened this thread so that people who regularly edit the article could check the sources, rather than having to do it myself. But, to the very best of my knowledge, no bishop has ever said ""I condemn this report of an apparition."" At most, the bishop would have said ""I don't want people to come to this site because I don't believe the apparition to be genuine."" I think ""does not acknowledge"" or ""does not approve"" is the more accurate statement. 
 ::::The ""Apparitions condemned by church authorities"" section begins, ""Not all reports of visions and apparitions are taken seriously by church authorities."" It later says, ""However the [Garabandal] apparitions were not declared a hoax and the possibility of future approval was left open"", and later again, ""the latter parts of the reported messages from Gianna Talone were disapproved by the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Baltimore...To date, the Holy See has let the Talone matter rest at the local level of the archdiocese."" Where's the condemnation? The section should be renamed ""Apparitions not acknowledged by church authorities"".    "