" 

 == Compromise == 

 Would anyone have a problem with keeping the current arrangement (Johnson in the title, Ocho Cinco in the text) until consensus can be reached? -   
 :Yes. Having title saying A and text saying B is just messy and unencyclopedic. Both the title and the text should read the same name. I would immensely prefer it stays Chad Johnson until we're week or two into the NFL season and we see what Chad is predominantly called by the media, and then fix the article accordingly when consensus backed up with sources is reached. I am, however, perfectly willing to help transition the article to Chad Ocho Cinco if he is indeed called ""Chad Ocho Cinco"" or ""Ocho Cinco"" by the majority of journalists and broadcasters, but I would like to see reliable sources calling him Ocho Cinco before we change the article.    

 My feeling is that the guy is named Ocho Cinco, and whether you think it's dumb, or you think he's an attention whore, that is in fact his name. If you enter ""Chad Johnson"" in the search bar, it's goiung to direct you here anyway, so what's the big deal? 

 And another thing: Why is the page titled ""Chad Johnson"" and yet he is referred to as ""Ocho Cinco"" all throughout the page? , "