":If there is sufficient agreement, I'd be fine adding some additional content if properly summarized and NPOV.  I think such would be acceptable for WP:WEIGHT as you describe, but I also think there are other areas that could use attention as well and maybe we should look at it in a different way.  The article has like one sentence for each NYT bestselling book, with no description or reception regarding the books (this is another place to tie in a critical comment or two).  They are easily relevant to his notability, and lack of attention in these other areas can give the perception that criticism is given too much weight in relation to other content as it grows in one section.  Unfortunately, most editors are not interested in the other aspects and the attention always goes to the criticism section on these types of biographies.  We just need to find those aspects that we can agree are properly significant enough to be tied into his notability and place it where it best ties in to the biography.  I think we could use some generic statements that he's been criticized by fellow commentators for being eccentric, emotional, etc, but not going into the detail as to who (it's in the ref - no need to list names of people like O'Reilly, Miller, Scarborough, etc - not pertinent).  My concern is, and you can see it with just the recent edits in the last 24hrs, the focused section becomes a troll magnet (not calling anyone a troll, it's just the term used) for adding in good faith random criticism.  That's the big issue with such sections in general, it becomes a list of criticism.  The more incidents (or detail) you add, the more likely people are to say.. ""well what about this one"" and tack it on.  The line gets less defined as what relates to his notability for the section and what is significant.  That's why I think it is important to keep it very limited, relevant, and brief.  I have no interest in future patrolling of this article and reverting content I (or we) deem to be unworthy.  I'd like to remove it from my watch list and move on to other topics.  I'm hoping that we can somehow set up a structure, watermark for notability relevance, and properly open and close the paragraphs to limit future stuffing and paragraph additions of unimportant trivia news and criticism.  Probably too lofty a goal for such a politically charged character and I certainly don't want to go through another debate on what is significant, but there it is...      

 "