" 

 == Loctician == 

 Can I repost the same info without putting the salons website info on it. she is actually the first person to have to word trademarked and its on file with the commomwealth of Virginia state corporation commission.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by   •    
 :The most important issue is whether the term has received coverage in third-party media, like a story in a major newspaper. Trademarking isn't significant on its own - Wikipedia determines notability by reference to multiple instances of coverage. See WP:NOTE.  If the term has widespread use, it could be included. If it's restricted to a single salon (and I would think it would be if it's trademarked - that's the point of trademarking), then it's unlikely to be notable. In no case would a link to the salon be appropriate.    

 :::This term is used nationwide, however this person was the first to trademark it. The word had been in circulation since the late 90's but locs were not as popular then. It is semi popular but just as the dreadlock community is growing so is the popularity of the word. just google it. So how can i post the definition without being deleted, Thanks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by   •    

 ::::can i re post?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by   •    

 :::::I'd suggest that you develop a draft, with references, in tour userspace at .  You can write and collect references there without deletion.  In generfal, unreferenced new articles don't fare well, so it's vital that you find high-quality references in newspapers and other publications to support the article.    

 == Could you please block this user... == 

 , according to a message he left on my talk page he is a way for  to evade his block.    
 :Taken care of - wasn't very long ago, and his parting shot had to be oversighted.    
 ::Just in case your feeling block-happy, I have another case for you, . He is abusing talk page privileges. Could you also handle this.    
 :::Acalamari already took care of it; thanks for the heads-up.    

 == Morgan-Manning House == 

 Hi:  We have a problem with .  He keeps re-adding specious information to Morgan-Manning House originally introduced by  and repeatedly corrected by a number of well meaning editors.  Thanks in advance for any assistance you can provide.   
 :You might want to discuss it directly with him, don't you think? I wouldn't call the material he's reverting spam, although it reads like a little bit of local boosterism, but I