"What is going on? This morning, Corvus cornix removed two FU images from Cillian Murphy for supposedly violating fair use and I reverted once with this message: ""this is fair use critical commentary; both performances are discussed by critics in this article; the images have not undergone official review and ongoing discussion has no consensus for removal"". Whatever Corvus may say, the two roles pictured are discussed by critics in the article (The New York Times, The San Francisco Chronicle, The Village Voice and The New Yorker are quoted) as per ""critical commentary"", and the discussion is ongoing at Non-free talk and the review of a third image. I have participated in good faith in all of the above (there is no consensus as of yet). Why am I being accused of being a problem for this? Also, the images were ratified at FAC three weeks ago. Why would there be an FAR over three fair use images? What has happened while I was away from the computer? This is all very confusing. Thanks,    

 "