" 

 == Selectively edited videos - Redux == 

 Hi, AzureCitizen!  Regarding this edit of yours, while you correctly identified the contested ""McRaven"" text in the most recent edit war on that article, did you overlook the fact that those same warriors were also contesting any mention of that group's associations with the Republican Party and Tea Party?  They were purging both sets of content with the same revert.  IMO, their associations are relevant information in any article that mentions that group, their videos, their attack ads, or their targets.   

 It's the Swifties all over again:  create political attack ads and videos; spam them as much as possible, while innocently denying any political motivation, before fact checkers, investigative journalists, etc., eventually dissect, expose and discredit the group and their attacks.  Then they will slither back under their rock after election season, smug about the shitstorm they kicked up, and uncaring about the tarnished reputation they leave stuck to their unfortunate apolitical bretheren that share a military unit or service branch with these asshats.  Blech.    "