" 

 ::I disagree as well.  One would think we were still living in the 1950's with Nobs01.  He created the Harry Magdoff article on June 6th, which was three paragraphs which mention nothing of how Magdoff is an editor of the Monthly Review, but go into great detail about how he was a Soviet spy, which it does not state as a question but a fact (""Magdoff was a member of the Perlo group of Soviet spies."")  This is about as unencyclopediac as one can get.  Then Magdoff says Venona ""proves"" Magdoff was a spy.  Well Venona does talk about a spy code-named TAN, and perhaps Venona proves TAN was a spy, but it does not offer proof that Harry Magdoff was a spy, unless you take as an article of faith that TAN was Harry Magdoff.  Even considering the systemic bias that most Wikipedians recognize exists due to English Wikipedia being written mostly by English-speaking people with access to the Internet, Nobs01 is at the far end of bias in terms of xenophobia, fear of red under every bed, imagining vast communist conspiracies (lucky for him he didn't live in France, where the largest political party in the 1950's was the communist party, or Italy where the communists almost came to power via the ballot box in 1976) and so forth.  On the William Remington page, he mentioned how Elizabeth Bentley accused him of being a spy - I spent weeks trying to insert a sentence saying that Remington then sued her for libel and she lost the case - finally he relented, after he reworded it to where it would seem the jury who decided that was duped. 

 ::I should point out that Nobs01 has ruined hundreds of articles with his nonsense, I figure Nobs01 is more for ArbCom to deal with, whenever they get around with.  I, and others, like Chip Berlet, have taken a stand on a few pages.  I am not going to let Nobs01 unfairly sully, in a POV way, the names of Harry Magdoff, IF Stone, and a few more people.  And while we're letting him post his POV screeds in dozens of other articles, he has no ability to compromise with me, Chip and the others who have tried to work for compromise in articles such as this one.  If ArbCom wasn't so over-burdened, Nobs01 would have been dealt with already.    

 "