:QG, would you identify which specific claims were either BLP violations or 'libelous'.  As you know, BLP does not exclude accurate and verifiable claims about living people, only un-reliably sourced (and especially un-reliably sourced negative) information.  But just because you don't 'like' a fact doesn't make it a BLP or libel case.  WP:Libel should only be brought up if you are going to seek legal action through the Foundation.  Do you intend to pursue such a claim?