" 

 Since Pussy Riot and Seuss are mentioned in the plot section, additional mention in the trivia section could be considered overcoverage... 
 :Thanks for completing missing the point of dispute in this discussion, which has no longer has anything to do with the Pussy Riot reference. The issue was Hearfourmewesique's characterization of another editor, as my notification at 3O made explicitly clear (though apparently not explicitly enough for you). It is perfectly reasonable to discus that here, since this is where that behavior took place. If you wanted to move the discussion to another talk page, you could have. Or could've created a subheading. Instead, you decided to discuss a completely different topic, one that, while initially the topic of this section, has already been resolved. Bravo. 

 You are obviously incapable of perceiving the concept of idioms. 
 :I am indeed aware of that idiom. I'm simply saying that it's irrelevant, as is Koavf's gender. Characterizing someone as ""the boy who cried trivia"" could be seen as pejorative. Period. Your refusal to even consider this as a possibility is simply another example in your documented history of violating WP:CIV. One more time: Polls other editors and ask them if they would perceive that behavior insulting. Ask them.   "