:::::Don't make me laugh, four editors discussing something on a vague tangent from what I am taling about doesn't make consensus. That is far from being consensus.    
 ::::(ec)You seem to be covering several projects in your version of the History.  The Negro Project has been covered by many organizations.  And what does it matter if 3 editors view it one way, its like you act like you have consensus just based on three editors that are viewing the page at this moment.  One of the other editors even mentioned the possability of adding the Negro Project.  You seem to be afraid of it, even thoough it supposedly had good aspects associated with it. It is clear POV to avoid things just because it may reflect a little bad on the organization.  The Negro Project was in progress at the start of the organization.  It has weight associated with it, whether or not revisionist history people agree or not.