" 

 == References and bibliography == 

 I think that short references like ""Stevenson 2014"" for the theme music to ""The Terminator"" which are actually references to Web articles should be, at the least, linked to that Web article, and not left bare looking like a reference to some untraceable book, or something. (At the moment the reader has to go to the article's unusual ""Bibliography"" section to find a link to ""Stevenson 2014"".) 

  doesn't seem to think this is a good idea, and reverted my changing that one reference to the same words with a link with the reason ""Why just this one? There are dozens of others like it in this list..."" 

 Aren't little incremental evolutionary improvements what makes Wikipedia work? I think one more link that saves readers from knowing they have to search the page for a full reference is better than zero more links. Shouldn't the references be like the ones in other articles, even if there's a ""Bibliography: References II!"" section below them? 

 What's the better way of doing this, if adding links one at a time is unacceptable? Why should that be the case, anyway? I'm mystified.   "