::::::::Which attitude? Yours. My aim WAS to improve the article, by taking out speculative nonsense from it. You have not addressed any of the points I have raised. It is clear from your own comments on this page that this the material is all your own research (for example, extroplating a completely irrelevant quote from Condoleeza Rice and applying it to an unrelated debate about forms of government - that was your idea, wasn't it?). Your own research is not valid content for wikipedia - do you not understand that? If you're not willing to do the work in sourcing your writing to someone notable, then take out the unsourced material. That's all I am asking. I didn't remove any of the substantive points you had made, just the unconvincing original research you used in supporting them.