" 
 :Indeed, as you've seen this is an old, old story that goes back six years just on here. And even then, it was just new to Wikipedia — in other forums, it goes back over 15 years. As always, Wikipedia's core and non-negotiable policy is that a public figure cannot be described or categorized as gay on the basis of allegations about their sexuality, or editors' unsourced assertions of private personal knowledge, or third party claims by Pamela Taylor or Enzo Di Matteo — it will be acceptable in his article only when he can be reliably sourced as having come out as gay in his own words, and not on the basis of anything less than that. And as for the most recent anonymous IP claim that the article already discusses his sexuality, it actually does no such thing — the only LGBT-related content in this article at all is one paragraph discussing REAL Women of Canada's infamous attack on him for including LGBT rights as part of the human rights component of his job. But LGBT rights are not an issue that only LGBT people themselves get onside with — heterosexual people are active on LGBT rights issues all the time, especially when they're involved in international diplomacy on the larger and more general issue of human rights. So nothing in the article, in and of itself, ""proves"" anything about his sexuality in and of itself.   "