" 

 :The section currently initially titled ""Intro"", currently titled ""Dispute"" (unless it gets renamed again) was a direct reply to the announcement of the survey, disputing my assertion that there was a need for a survey: Since ""Dispute"" did not sufficiently describe the content of the section, I re-named it to ""Is there a dispute?"", based on the first sentence RJII had written: ""Is there even much of a dispute about the intro?"" After it became clear that people were actually responding to RJII's objections and that a productive discussion was taking place, RJII took the extra step of re-arranging the sections so that the disucssion no longer made sense. I now have the opinion that disrupting discussion of this article is 's explicit intent.    "