" 

 == Ignorance is no basis for opinion == 

 Studying Einstein led me, by natural progression, to Sachs.  If anyone wants details of either's work, all you have to do is read it! 

 Sachs is nothing but a first-rate scholar.  Beginning in the 1950s, by 2010 he had published upwards of 200 times on completion of Einstein's theory and related subjects, articles in reputable journals and books by reputable science publishers. 

 Yes, it is Nobel Prize quality.  It is an embarrassment that the physics community has become so closely-knit that only one road is deemed worthy of not being labeled ""quackery,"" the quantum road.  Yet, Einstein himself  largely credited with having given birth to that which would be labeled ""quantum""  insisted that quantum theory ""offers no useful point of departure for future development,"" but, rather, that a complete theory would depend on ""finding the field equations for the total field,"" having transformation group not ""any narrower than that of the continuous transformations of co-ordinates.  This is what Sachs completed, having shown Einstein to have been correct within 15 years of his death! 

 So you tell me why no one will read it."