" 

 :Well, first of all, that they are all of ""unverifiable authenticity"" is your opinion; the Wikipedia article on hadith states ""The overwhelming majority of Muslims consider ahadith to be essential supplements to and clarifications of the Qur'an, Islam's holy book."" Second, even if they were (and I see no evidence of it), your argument would mean that 'every single time hadith are mentioned in Wikipedia they would require the words ""of unverifiable authenticity"" appended to them, which is simply silly.  "