== Recognition section - neutral point of view == 

 As the story continues with Greg Mortenson, several universities have revoked honorary degrees or awards that had been committed to be awarded to Greg Mortenson, and at least one university has formed a committee to determine whether the honorary degree should be renouced. 

 Writing from a neutral point of view stance, should we include both the degrees/awards that were issued and the ones that were revoked? Or just the ones that were issued? If we do not include the ones that were revoked, would the article be written from a neutral point of view? 

 My personal take is that we should include both the degrees/awards that were issued as well as those that were revoked, as long as reliable sources verify the informaiton. I think this information would be beneficial to students who may be studying ethics or writing papers on the subject.