, you are doing yourself no favor by beating these dead horses again; it's in fact more IDHT, and qualifies as evidence in the RfC.  All of this was covered, and resolved, here.  Just read it!  My deletion of Adams was accidental, and I said so and thanked you for fixing it  it is major bad faith (and major IDHT) to bring it up again.  How could you possibly bring it up here without being careless or disingenuous?  And yes, there was consensus to restore White 2004, here  at least five editors agreed, and you were the only holdout, based on an unsound reason (it's all in the thread, and it will all be in the RfC soon).  A reasonable person who read the latter thread  should they be able to suffer through it  would easily spot the IDHT.  Like, every time someone points it out.  ( •