: I apologise if my choice of words made my comment sound harsh or personal - I do try and avoid confrontation. It just seems that, through looking through the archives, people are banging their heads against a brick wall with regards to reconstructing this article to read like a Wikipedia article should (the observations made by user UkrainianAmerican in Archive 24 say it all).  
 The article is informative if a little too in depth in areas, but seems to be written to intentionally portray the party in a negative light and this removes credibility, yet I see so much potential for improvement as most of the information actually needed is already here.