" 

 ::::How do you mean Jimbo?  I believe the gist of the points counter to Til's aren't that no one has ever claimed that ""creation myth"" is a bad descriptor of these passages, but that this view is 1) very dated and 2) a fringe position within scholarship.  The argument is over how much room one needs to give a fringe position in the introduction to the article.  Til wants to include language that makes it seem like there is a lot of opposition when there isn't.  This is what people object to.  We should not be saying ""many scholars ..."" when referring to a position that is very rarely challenged by anyone.  This gives off a false impression and hurts our credibility.  If anything I could see an argument for including the opposing position with the disclaimer, ""some Christian theologians ..."" or something of that nature.  (Disclaimer:  I was an avid proponent of changing the title to the current one).  "