" 

 ;Overall 
 *Well-written?:  Could use a copyedit, and currently fails MOS 
 *Verifiable?:  Not up to par 
 *Broad in coverage?:  Almost 
 *Neutral?:  Needs POV cleaning 
 *Stable?:  All recent work has only been to construct the article 
 *Illustrated, if possible, by images?:  For File:The Cincinnati Post, Farewell Edition.jpg, I would fill in the ""n.a."" fields of the FUR. Picture of city copy desk is unnecessary. 
 *Pass or Fail?:  I'm very sorry, but this is being failed as there are too many issues with the article right now to put it on hold. ""Notable former employees"" is particularly problematic. Better luck next time.   /   

 , thanks for such a thorough review. (It's my first GA nomination, so I appreciate the time you spent on it.) I'll address the various issues piecemeal and respond to individual points above. –    

 :You're quite welcome, though this is going to take extensive work to meet GA standards. After addressing the above, I suggest putting this up for WP:Peer review and get lots of input there before renominating. I will finish at that, and wish you luck in the future.   /  "