" 

 == ~8000 vs >8300 == 

 The article current states that ""at least 8300"" were killed based on figures of ""missing and killed"". I advocate using ""an estimated 8,000"" since most estimates vary between 7-8000. Thus ""an estimated 8000"" seems fair. Some examples: 

 :#HRW (""“Safe Areas” for Srebrenica’s Most Wanted; A Decade of Failure to Apprehend Karadzic and Mladic, June 2005) uses ther words ""between 7,000 and 8,000""   
 :#The Enclyclopedia Britannica says ""more than 7,000"" http[://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9403267/Bosnia-and-Herzegovina] 
 :#""Accounting for Genocide: How Many Were Killed in Srebrenica?"", European Journal of Population, Sept. 2003. It concludes that ""We conclude that at least 7,475 persons were killed after the fall of Srebrenica.""  and  
 :#BBC writes ""more than 7,000"" (""Timeline: Siege of Srebrenica"") 
 :#CNN referst to ""up to 8,000"" (""Srebrenica: 'A triumph of evil'"", May 2006) 
 :#Domovina.net cites ""Around 8000"" (""Srebrenica  Introduction"", May 2002) 
 :#NIOD report writes that ""The Yugoslavia Tribunal concluded that between 7000 and 8000 men were executed, although this does not allow for the possibility that some will have died during the march for any of a number of other reasons. Based on the Bosnian Serb figure of approximately 6000 'prisoners of war' captured by the VRS, it seems that of the 7500 missing persons, approximately 6000 faced execution while the others met their end through some other cause."" (NIOD report, Part IV, Chapter 2:20, ""Review"") 
 :#ICTY in its judgement against Krstic writes ""between 7,000 – 8,000"" (ICTY, April 2004, para. 2) 
 Remember, Wikipedia is not the place for Original research. Regards  "