" 

 == Florida robocall... == 

 ...was a notable event in Florida campaign, with significant coverage in multiple RSs. Inclusion of this topic in the Florida section of the article complied with WP:V, WP:RS, WP:NPOV etc. BDell reverted and I have restored it.  Dell's rv ed sum said: ""article will be massive if every ad or call discussed. Is there a theme here or is it trivial? Gingrich Comms Dir says this robocall won't run again"" WP:IDON'TLIKEIT is a deficient argument. And the straw man argument re. a ""massive"" article if ""every ad or call discussed""  also  fails to impress - nobody has suggested discussing every ad or call - and anyway, WP:SPINOFF can be implemented if/when needed as usual. To offer DeSantis's promise that the call won't happen again as a reason to exclude it from the article is patently absurd. Sorry but I can't even begin to take seriously an argument that this event in the Florida campaign, which received significant coverage in multiple RSs, should be excluded from the article on the grounds that Gingrich's campaign manager says ""it won't happen again""  ROFLMAO! We build the article according to what RS sources say, not what Gingrich's campaign manager says. Or do we?   "