== Article is pretty good == 
 I've read the article now, and made some minor changes (mostly improvements). It's a lot better than I expected from the level of arguments going on. There is still some repetition eg Unimodal in history section and later on in Proposals section. And I think the introduction is a bit heavy - just because the article is big doesn't mean the introduction has to be. Of course, deciding what to prune is another matter.