" 

 == /* Controversy */  No evidence given of non-NPOV claim == 

 The article states that ""But of course flaws can also be found in these anti-Dvorak works, for example claiming that the man in charge of the 1956 investigation had a personal grudge against Dvorak"". Aside from this sentence not fitting Wiki grammar standards, it has no reference supporting it or an evidence at all, and it reads frankly like a pro-DVORAK smear. I've put a CN tag on it for now, and I'll come back in a few days to see if it has been improved, otherwise I think it should go.   "