", 28 January 2014 (UTC) 

  The Allvoices.com article cited here is unreliable simply because it was taken from here, a well-known pro-terrorist activist agit-prop website, one of that who some hypocrite users here would define as ""neutral tone"" and ""balanced"" (they really believe their own lies?). I understand that its hard to some seeing their beloved ""revolutionaries"" loosing ground everyday, but thats not a reason for trying to make us accept non-journalist activist partisan sources while censoring other journalistic sources, and even trying to decide wich articles are accepted as reliable sources and wich not, when they are posted by the same publisher!!! And finally, and sorry for putting it in caps, WIKIPEDIA TALK PAGES ARE NOT FORUMS SO STOP IT RIGHT NOW!  23:02"