" 

 ==Easier to digest== 
 I'm not sure I buy ""therefore easier to digest"".  I think it is easier to digest three separate policies than one longer, multi-topic one, even if the total length of the three separate ones exceeds that of the combined one.  That said, I don't think ATT is hard to digest, and to the extent that it might resolved problems with RS, the end result may be better and be easy enough to digest. —  [] [] ツ  

 ==Looks good otherwise== 
 Other than the two above issues, it is pretty compelling (in theory; there are all kinds of things that can go wrong; no everyone is in cahoots with the ""attributable"" vs. ""attributed"" and ""attributable/attributed vs. verifiable"" distinctions, and who knows what changes might creep in later, but I don't see any particular reason that ATT couldn't be viable. I think Jimbo was unnecessarily harsh about it, though I agree with some of his gripes, mostly the procedural/consensus ones.  As I said elsewhere, I think one of the two possible ""Jimbo compromise"" end results would be better than ATT totally replacing the others, or ATT going away. —  [] [] ツ "