" 

 ==more original research?== 

 This article also states: ""For this accident, he was court-martialed, convicted and censured for ""remissness in performance"". More than 60 died in the blast.[1] He was later reprimanded by the Secretary of the Navy for verbally abusing a fellow officer who testified in the matter. Young’s Navy personnel records reveal that the Secretary of the Navy reprimanded Young for a public verbal dispute with a Lt. Commander Bartlett who had testified in the proceeding. Young, on a public pier, called Bartlett a ""liar and a perjurer"". The Secretary of the Navy labeled Young’s actions as ""grossly insulting to a brother officer"" and that to Young there was ""only one course available"" a ""full, frank, and manly apology for a display of temper."" Which, after a delay of several days, Young did. His Naval records show another censure for ""misleading and inaccurate reporting"" regarding the boilers of the Vicksburg in 1909. No explosion resulted simply several days of delay."" What is the reference for most of this? It again looks like original research. It also apppears to contradict in part http://www.history.navy.mil/photos/events/ev-1900s/ev-1905/bengtn.htm: ""Despite the awful death toll, which far exceeded that sustained by the Navy in the Spanish-American War, and sometimes lurid rumors of misconduct on the part of some members of Bennington's engineering force, official investigations concluded that the tragedy had not resulted from negligence."" One wonders how Young could be convicted for ""remissness"" by the Navy when the official history site of that Navy states ""that the trajedy had not resulted from negligence."" Indeed, it would seem unlikely that had such a judgement been made that the officer in question's career would continue upward with progressively more senior assignments and his ultimate promotion to flag rannk. It is also highly unlikely that a general encyclopedia of the period would include court-martial results - the citation is not sufficient (edition? page number?) for anyone to easily verify - besides the most derogatory comments have no citation given for verification purposes - again we are to trust some wiki-ite's private research?"