" March 2008 (UTC) 

 I don't think either article should be titled ""invasion"", for different reasons. In the case of the British in 1904, I think that it does meet the narrow definition of an ""invasion"", so, titling it an invasion would not be inaccurate. However, I think that, as Alexwoods argues, ""invasion"" also implies that the invader intends to occupy the country or something along those lines, which was not the case in the Younghusband incident. So, ""expedition"" would be a preferable title. In the case of the PLA in 1950, we have the opposite situation. There is no doubt that they came to occupy. But, the term ""invasion"" means that we are talking about one country violating the territory of a separate country. Wikipedia cannot take sides on whether China and Tibet were separate countries in 1950.—· 22:29, 22"