" 
 :Actually I did not say it was ""incorrect""; I wrote ""incorrectly constructed"". I am glad you agree about ""better suited"" I hope if you think a little longer why it is better suited, you will understand what exactly is  wrong with the first version. In  the second example, on the contrary, in no way ""other"" does not imply ""all"". Again, please don't rephrase what you don't understand in full. No, I will not going to explain why your another attempt is even worse. Face it: you don't know the subject so back off. Of course, more permutations of English language may finally produce the correct result, but that would be a million monkeys method of editing wikipedia. If I seem aggressive, it is that because I've had my fair share of struggle with technical writers who genuinely wanted to ""improve"" technical user guides and utterly failed to understand why my broken English was preferable to their meaningless texts in perfect English.    "