" 

 ==Bucharest bombing, cont'd.== 
 First, regarding the planned resistance article: yes, I'd be fine with mentioning 1990 within the body of the last section. What I don't want happening, and what Anonimu seems to desire, is to give the impression that everything came to a halt when bullets hit the Ceauşescus' bodies. Clearly, there was a denouement to it all, and we should make sure the next months are touched upon, in the context of continuing resistance (which is likely what the protesters saw it as). Of course, we also do have to stop somewhere; Cristian Tudor Popescu said on TV recently that alegerea lui Traian Băsescu nu a fost un act de anti-comunism, ci de anti-corupţie, so for him the anti-Communist movement is still ongoing... 

 As for pre-December 30, 1947 material: once again, I agree that a ""prehistory"" section would be a good idea; we just shouldn't give the impression that resistance arose suddenly on the day the People's Republic was proclaimed, since things were definitely stirring before that time. Furthermore, although I don't know this for a fact, it's even possible that anti-Communist resistance took place between 23 August 1944 and 6 March 1945, not necessarily in the form of opposition to domestic Communists, since there was as of yet no Communist-controlled government, but in the form of anti-Soviet sabotage. That is, the ""liberators"" were probably not universally welcomed. But, as always, reliable sources are a must. 

 Now on to the bombing: I seem to have stumbled on a pretty broad topic. I've found eleven New York Times articles from 1944 referencing various bombings of Romania, including one of a Soviet bombing of Galaṭi. I also have five Internet sites that could be of use: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 (on bombings of Bessarabia, then just being recaptured by the USSR, plus a sixth already mentioned (6. For now, that's all the information I have, and I will work on incorporating it as time permits. 

 By the way, and I mentioned this on Jmabel's talk page: the political context of the spring 1944 bombings is probably worth a mention, as a good portion of Romania's political leadership was seeking a way out of the war after Stalingrad–even Antonescu himself, to some extent. Could the bombings have had as their aim not only physical destruction, but also persuading anti-Fascist forces to step up efforts to switch sides? It's an intriguing possibility, as the switch did happen quite soon afterwards, and secret negotiations were also ramped up (eg, in the form of Ştirbey's mission to Cairo). 

 Mulţumesc pentru editări şi am să-ţi zic tu dacă aşa doreşti.  "