My sincere apology for reverting other's change without explanations because I did not realise the importance of it at that time since I do not contribute to Wikipedia as a hobby or habit and the Talk & other various gizmo on the Wikipedia is totally foreign to me.  This is the first (and possibly the last) contribution to Wikipedia as I felt compelled  to improve the article since I know the subject well enough to find the information in the original article incomplete and predisposed. If a reader find  the references difficult to use due to my poor writing,  he should talk or improve them but not delete a perfectly good article.  
 Due to the nature of the Wikipedia, conventional methods of verification are generally impossible which has made the tasks of referencing rather difficult .   A person of unknown ability and quality deemed the references being of poor quality that does not render it is the case.  On two occasions I used Guanyin Citta's website which is closely related to Jun Hong Lu, thus the comments made by Ogress that references are unreliable,  paid, non-independent or self-supported which are totally unwarranted and unjustifiable. It is merely his/her personal opinion regardless of the intentions.  
 
 The references are from independent and reliable sources which fully collaborate the article repeatedly and consistently. 
 
 This article is a biography of a living person, I can't see any reason not to quote from the website of the person as long as it is clearly indicated, especially it is about Jun Hong Lu's personal life that has nothing to do with his currently status as a religious leader.  

 The part of the article, being deleted on 12 June by the person mentioned above, is not written or posted by me. I was convinced enough to leave the way it was as it is consistent with the other information I know but not disclosed in the article which would obviously change after this incident if the outcome of the dispute permits.  The warning  tags were removed after necessary changes have been made to the references and the article so the issues are then considered resolved by me.  

 May I ask who is going to decide if this article is going to be deleted or kept? And if it is to be kept, in what form?