"::If Wikipedia was a shopping tool, it would already need to offer precise info about Windows 2000 (for instance, as many people I have a couple PCs still perfectly running with W2K; when time comes to consider updating them, then I will need precise info about both the new and the old systems to compare). But Wikipedia being an encyclopedia, it even more needs precise info about objects of all times. In addition, ""who wants to learn"", ""bad"", and even ""outdated"", are not quite appropriate terms IMO in or around an encyclopedia. So I suggest you simply remove, even in this discussion page, the whole phrase ""And anyways..."" (and my present reply as well). Otherwise I agree that the details of W2K versions should remain (as they are currently) inside the main W2K article.    

 "