" 

 ::I don't see a source attached to ""infamously poor"". The preceding (Please Please Me ... 2009."") and following (""A remastered ... box set."") statements are footnoted ([16] and [17], respectively) but not the claim in question. If footnote [17] is also supposed to cover ""infamously poor"", then it needs to be move closer to it, and the sentence should be reworded to make clear an opinion is being cited, not offered. Something to the effect of, ""The 2009 remasters replaced the heavily critized[16b] 1987 remasters"" As it stands now, the article appears to be offering its own commentary."