== Thank you == 

 Thanks for the rollback tool. I no longer have access to VandalProof which was always my crutch more than my helper. I am only able to contribute in short bursts so I would like to make my edits more helpful and contructive and try and avoid the asy path of just reverting vandals. I've done enough of that. But it's good to know that if I spot something amiss I can revert it efficiently. I was really impressed with some of the interview text that was added on the Straocaster player list talk page. I am a big fan of direct quotes for notability. I have a couple of comments/content that I can add on the player talk page I don't think it is as good as what has been added but it might be useful. I will comment further on the subject over there. On a topic we discussed before - guitar advertising - mainly the ESP guitars that are linked from the Category page. I had started with the Fender category because I thought there was some overkill happening there. I went through comparing to the other makers and when I looked at the ESP page it definitely made me give my head a shake. Just about every single model they've made has a page. And all that's on the pages is 1 line of text and an infobox. Some pages have a link to a band who might have a member who plays the page subject model. There must 2 dozen of these pages. Maybe I should bring this up at the guitar project talk page. Is it very active? In my opinion pretty much all of these pages should be deleted or at least just redirected back to the main ESP page. At least the fender pages have a small paragraph of text. The ESP pages have almost nothing. I am surprised they have lasted this long. Anyways I will add a thought or 2 at the Stratocaster page. Maybe look around a bit more at some other pages before I turn in. Cheers and take care!