" 
 :::In principle, I don't agree with the sentiment about ""name calling"". In practice, I like very much what you edited and it is an excellent addition to the article. If I may say so, it definitely moved the article toward another Featured Article nomination.  
 :::But it is not there yet. My concern lies in the idea that we should avoid including a position, labeling it name-calling. What this does is set up an automatic bias and POV. It also means that we, as editors, are taking a position that it is name calling and it is not factually correct (and I don't know if it is name-calling or correct). And, it means that very positive, positive, and balanced commentary will be allowed, and perhaps some very carefully worded negative commentary. But very negative commentary is then excluded. This means that if a number of the most prominent atheists in the western world (or perhaps world) are united in their strong condemnation, it will not be allowed—in an encyclopedia which is supposed to capture all notable ideas.  
 :::The following sentence presents a very positive position: ""Biographers, Mormon and non-Mormon, agree that Smith was one of the most influential, charismatic, and innovative figures in American religious history."" It would be unfortunate and very un-encyclopedic if we keep that but exclude a very negative position.  
 :::In any case, I'm quite satisfied that your edits addressed, in a significant part, the POV issues that exist. I personally would not vote for it to become a featured article without including, even in passing, the atheists' position. But that's just me.  
 :::In any case, thank you again for the addition. It is very welcome.   "