" 
 ::I'm not entirely sure - the current title just struck me as a little odd. ""Historically Important"" seems to imply a larger significance than is born out by the commentary in the article. Perhaps substituting ""significant"" for ""important?"" Or perhaps something that adds more context - the lead indicates that these are individuals whose significance is primarily within the Marine Corps itself; maybe ""List of U.S. Marines significant in Marine Corps lore""? Unwieldy, I know, and not a particularly desirable choice anyway. Just some thoughts, really.   "