" 
 :::the list of reasonable attemtps is rather short. The language is likely ""Minoan"", which is itself unknown, which explains why we have no idea what the text says. The script is almost certainly syllabic, possibly with stray logograms. Personally, I am rather convinced that D-02 identifies personal names, so that we'd have a list of 16 names or so, followed by a short text containing another 3-4 names.    

 ==Character names== 
 Evertype, I am glad there is a Unicode proposal underway, but as always, I think that Unicode names, not to mention proposed Unicode names are not notable enough to be listed in the presentation of an alphabet; rather, once the alphabet is encoded, there can be a separate ""Unicode"" section, as on Runic alphabet, Ge'ez alphabet and many other articles. offtopic note for the record, I further think that fanciful Unicode names are a rather unhappy choice for ancient scripts, it would be much better to encode them just by their commonly used numberings (Anatolian hieroglyphs nos. 1-524; Phaistos glyphs 1-46, Cretan syllabograms 1-96, and case in point Cuneiform ""Borger 1-598"" or similar: it is a nightmare to find the glyph you are looking for otherwise.   "