" 

 ==Re: Three Kings islands== 

 Hi there. I put the tag up because this article has zero references - I don't think its much to ask to put even ONE reference into this article. You say ""most of the info is measured or taken from the map in the article, or from the external reference given"": If its an external reference then it should be under a ""References"" heading not a ""External links"" one- external links aren't nessecarily references. As for the link given, there is no information there. It just has some writing in german and a link to some ""Lycos"" page - the ""Unreferenced"" tag should stay there to encourage someone to find references for this page. I'm being quite fair when you consider that this is written on the wikipedia Wikipedia:Verifiability page: 

 Be careful not to go too far on the side of not upsetting editors by leaving unsourced information in articles for too long, or at all in the case of information about living people. Jimmy Wales, founder of Wikipedia, has said of this: ""I can NOT emphasize this enough. There seems to be a terrible bias among some editors that some sort of random speculative 'I heard it somewhere' pseudo information is to be tagged with a 'needs a cite' tag. Wrong. It should be removed, aggressively, unless it can be sourced. This is true of all information, but it is particularly true of negative information about living persons.""[2] 

 Its nothing personal but this page does need references; there is alot of specific information in there ( facts, figures, dates 
 etc) and at the moment its totally unverifiable; whoever wrote this could have made everything up.  "