"Have I acted in bad faith here? Have I accused others of ""making shit up""? No, I have not.  You cannot continue to bring up the past whilst I do not, though it would be reasonable for me to if this is how the game is being played. It was not OR, I simply quoted what the article said. Did I include my own words?  Did I make it up myself? No, I sourced it, stamped it, whatever. But, as I said, SECONDARY claim. You have any idea how much crap has been pumped into this article without such hostile response(s)? Every day there is some guy who adds in a little detail that is clear OR, without a single complaint. I know you don't like me Nab, it's all good...but I'm trying to make this about the article, not personal angst. The secondary quote is more descriptive and clearly necessary. It's not repetive, it doesn't promote a POV, it is simply a factual statement and is Hamas' response to the direct, and is far less vague than: ""the government will show no mercy to collaborators who stab our people in the back, and they will be held accountable according to the law."" The secondary quote was far more direct and clear. I also like how the current statements cut off the ""if any collaborator is sentenced to death, we will not hesitate to carry it out."" Weird. The quote I inserted is right above in the previous post or one before.  Who is this somebody else? Someone rewrote it, I personally didn't care, I simply pointed out and corrected the inaccuracies and included verifiable information that doesn't warrant such aggression. The hands I edited, the knees are important because it was systematic. They weren't casualties of war, so your example of 1300+, 5000+ wounded is totally irrelevant and I truly am bothered why you continue to bring it up as if it is relevance? Am I supposed to feel guilty??  I stated why it was necessary to mention the knee shooting, Hamas went into homes and shot suspects in the knees and tortured them. ""Wounded"" is not an appropriate reflection, especially when there are dozens of sources to verify my above statements. I've said err...3 times from my count. Feel free to ask again, those this time I might copy/paste cause I'm truly getting tired and am nearing the part where one shouldn't have to agf.  But, I believe this whole discussion might be the result of confusion, which is why I'm continuing it. Thanks for your quick response.    

 "