" 
 :::::::: [u|Codename Lisa], 
 ::::::::#There would not be any loss if the proposal is carried out as I am not suggesting we merge Microsoft Exchange. In fact, there should be a section there that describes Exchange Server in more detail, with a sub-heading on the Outlook on the web component of Exchange Server, it can briefly describe the history of Outlook on the web as it was OWA previously. 
 :::::::::# Take a look at Marriot's OWA, notice I can access the login page from my own computer. Obviously, that is connected and hosted from their own internal servers. The mail server is Exchange Server and the part that makes it online WWW. I don't know or care about the security behind it because that is not what I am talking about. If you want to update the Microsoft Exchange article, please be my guest. But remember, OWA is a WWW connected component of Exchange Server where the company-private emails are hosted on 
 :::::::#MSA Outlook Mail: If you look here at the WinBeta article, notice how it has begun to ""slowly roll-out to a small subset of users"" 
 :::::::#Here's another source here, it clearly says Outlook Mail in the images. I am simply basing the moves off of branding. Do you expect them to rename it back to Outlook.com? I honestly don't since the information and product is already ""released to world"" You must not understand Microsoft's new strategy, but this is much like Gmail rolling out new features, it slowly disseminates to everyone rather than Google ""flipping a switch"" all of a sudden. 
 :::::::#Exchange Server 2016 is already in preview as of July. 
 :::::::#Outlook Mail is on a slow release to world, it was supposed to be opt-in, but that has not occurred yet. If we can create the Outlook on the web article, but hold off on the article renaming, I can be fine with that. Also, I want to hold off on deleting the MWSS template as it is quite obvious that this is how the services will end up being    "