" 
 :::::::::::::No problem: your reaction was quite understandable given that definition of the word. That wasn't what I meant when I said ""misquote"". I apologize for not following my own advice and clarifying the definition of ""misquote"" earlier, which might have saved a lot of time and trouble.  I should have known to do that.  As I sometimes say, one benefit of my giving people advice is that sometimes I follow it myself (whether or not anyone else does). And I apologize for saying things using the word ""misquote"" which could easily be interpreted as accusations of things you didn't actually do. 
 :::::::::::::I would now like to change the heading ""G-Dett has misquoted Jayjg"" on the workshop page. Would it be an improvement if I change it to ""G-Dett has mischaracterized what Jayjg said""? You might want to suggest different wording. (I realize you still may not agree with the statement, though, and I might not necessarily accept wording you suggest.)  I assume this part is OK since it doesn't use the word ""misquote"": ""G-Dett has stated that Jayjg said things, which were inaccurate representations of what Jayjg actually said"".  I'm not sure whether I should change the heading ""G-Dett cautioned about quoting"", perhaps to ""G-Dett cautioned about assertions about Jayjg's position"".  I'm also going to reply to your comment on the workshop page. ☺  "