" 

 == When to remove IPA? == 

 Over at WT:ELEMENTS, an IPA topic evolved (warning: barbed posts appear too). The question is: when a pronunciation is clear always (no mistakes, unambiguous), like with tin, can we remove the IPA pron from the article? (from its infobox in this case?). Of course then the  must go too. 

 Already, for mercury I found a don't: mercury (element) and mercury (deity) differ by IPA. So,  apart from tin, silver, gold, there are not much candidates. Could you contribute an IPA-based reasoning to remove IPA at WT:ELEMENTS? 

 Note: an different discussion is running in parallel, this one is hotter: ""remove  from elements, like from astatine, because it is ugly"" (also at astatine FAC). IMO, this is a separate one. -  "