Rjecina's reverting Reason: Massive rewriting without discussion, writing of personal thinking, statements are not supported by sources which are speaking different, editorial style as given is utterly false- no massive rewriting is visible - all statements are supported by valid scholar references- editorial style is ok  I would qualify Rjecina's revert as vandalism due to the fact that she removed references supporting some statements that were tagged by  previously, as uncivilty - for attacking the anonymous editor baselessly