"Can you please explain, why you removed reliable pew research center statistics (2012) in favour of another source. Please have a look at my edits on religion in Belgium again. There is no particular emphysis on Islam. Percentage if Muslims is same i.e ., 6%. Infact, the percentage of Christians is greater i.e., 64.2%. This shows that I have no bias for Christianity. Can you explain it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by   •   
 : Can you please explain why you replaced the long-standing Eurobarometer source (2012) in favor of your source? Your undue emphasis is in this sentence: ""Belgium is religiously diverse society with Christianity and Islam being the most widely professed religions."" The two religions are not remotely comparable with respect to the number of adherents. By the way, still looking for your answer on this: .    
 ::If the sentence: ""Belgium is religiously diverse society with Christianity and Islam being the most widely professed religions."" is wrong from your perspective, then you should remove it individualy , instead if reverting my whole edits. Secondly, can you please explain what's wrong with reliable 2012 pew estimate compared to eurobaromenter.   
 ::: Please explain why you want to change a long-standing source. I'm putting the onus on you because of your constant POV-pushing (which a number of editors have warned you about) that is continuing: , ,     
 :Please look at the article first. How disorganized the article is? One source gives an estimate of 49% for Christians and other source gives an estimate of 59% Catholic and 6% other christian. But interestingly another stupid source in the lead states that 1.7% are protestant and 0.3% Orthodox. This is complete stupidity. Is not it? The reader is unable to comprehend all these statistics. I just wanted to make the article more organized and readable by providing a single reliable and recent i.e., 2012 source. If I am a Muslim POV pusher then please tell me what would I get by placing pew center source and statistics. A lot of sources on article already give 6% figure for Muslims. In fact I removed a source which gave 8.1% figure for Muslim population because it was too dubious. Is this POV? I just wanted to help wikipedia in a civilized manner. Understand it or not. I am not going to waste my time on this stupid article anymore.   
 :Please respond quickly. Please allow me to improve the article using pew estimates. I assure you that I will not give too much importance to Islam. Thanks.   
 ::You expect a quick answer but won't answer  even after being asked several times?    
 ::, okay, the Pew estimates are from 2010. The Eurobarometer source is from 2012. Why do you want to use an older survey?    
 :Yep. I want to use pew estimates because they look more acceptable to me.   
 :, please look at talk:Religion in Norway. Is this so called concensus? Is this so called cooperative behaviour?   
 ::, your behavior there is the same as it is on here in that you expect to get your way simply on the basis of your unsubstantiated opinion. ""I want to use pew estimates because they look more acceptable to me."" is akin to saying that cak