", 26 April 2014 (UTC) 

 Nikkimaria, I have a tremendous respect for you as an editor, and I think that, in most cases, using two or three letter codes in edit summaries is entirely fine. I use ""ce"" all the time. It becomes problematic, however, when you use those codes after the edit in question has become contested. The first edit summary, where you said ""ce, doc, refs"", was fine. I didn't know what ""doc"" meant (and I still don't), but it didn't matter because I got the gist that it was a copyedit and reformatting. The second edit summary, where you said ""doc"", is where the abbreviations become problematic. You're now no longer dealing with a routine copyedit, you're dealing with a formatting choice that has been contested by another editor. In such a case, you would need to explain your reasoning in the edit summary or on the article talk page (in which case the edit summary would need to point out that there was a thread on the article talk page about the edit). Likewise, the third edit summary, where you said ""change width"", is also unacceptable. Yes, it's more descriptive than ""doc"", but you still failed to provide a reasoning for your change, which by that point had been contested several times. 
 I should note that between 11:39, 26 April 2014‎ and 18:40, 26 April 2014‎, you made the same change three times. Yes, the width was different one of the times, and yes, it wasn't just a straight revert, but right now, you are edit warring. A rules pedant might take you to 3RR (although I doubt it would actually go anywhere). I am not a rules pedant, however. I don't see any point to you being blocked over this; it would do more harm than good. What I'd really like is an explanation. Why do you keep making this change? What, exactly, is wrong with {{reflist|2}}? When you get reverted, and you make the change again, you need to back up that change with an explanation. Keep your abbreviations for the bulk of your edits, just break out something more substantive if someone contests the changes. That's really what's being asked for.   22:18"