" 

 ::Let me direct you to the article on Schopenhauer in McMillan, 1967, vol. 7, p. 331-332.  ""...when philosophical speculation in general has been at a discount, he [Schopenhauer] has attracted little interest. Yet such neglect is undeserved, and the significance of his contribution should not be underestimated.  He realized more fully than the majority of his contemporaries the implications of the Kantian critique of traditional metaphysics, and some of the things he himself had to say about the nature of a priori knowledge have a strikingly modern ring"".  This appears to be a contrast to Guyer.  These are not my words or my interpretations.  Do you think this publication and the authors have the philosophical community at heart? or not?  At this point I quote Lestrade ""Has User Fi99ig actually spoken the mind of ""the philosophical community""?""  Do you want more? I'll find it if need be.  "