" 

 == Critic's Reception on episode sections== 
 Is it necessary to put critical receptions on each episode? Family Guy has had a track history of critics hating it, or warming less to it then other shows, so why with all the nitpicking little reviews on each episode? its kinda irrelevent.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by   •    

 ==Accents== 
 These need to go, the actors basing their voice on someone from a particular region does not make it the accent of that region. It's entirely subjective. I don't know about the American accents but Stewie is reported to have an 'English' accent. Accents vary hugely in England (as I'm sure they do in the US) It's not uncommon for someone to not be able to understand a word another person that lives 300 miles away says due to accent. Accents can't be proven so they either go or it's changed to say that the voice is based on someone from (insert region here).    

 This info is quite valid, and i have replaced it. Accents are well documented, recognised, quoted, and parodied. 
 The fact that accents vary within a country is irrelevant.  
 Stewie is said to ""have what some consider an upper-class affected English accent and stereotypical archvillain phrases"", It does not say he has just an English accent.   

 Accents cannot be proven, they are entirely subjective. ""an upper-class affected English accent"" - is that a Mancunian, Liverpudlian or Somerset accent? There are upper-class people in all these areas. If you want to include this information state what the accents are intended to be, not what they 'are'.    

 ==No mention of ""Joe Swanson""== 
 Isn't he the same class as ""Cleveland & Glenn"" ? 

 ""Patrick Warburton: Joe Swanson"" SHOULD be added to the main cast.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by     

 ==Criticism section== 

 It mentions that The Simpsons has referenced Family Guy unflatteringly twice, suggesting that the people behind The Simpsons are criticising Family Guy. However, Seth MacFarlane has always maintained that there is good feeling between the two sides (unlike with South Park).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by     

 ==Unbalanced== 
 Normally changes happen very fast on wikipedia. I am curious, if this page is so unbalanced with criticism why has it not yet shown how the show clearly violated many ethics and flat out lied by calling Senator McCain a Nazi?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by   •    

 :* You may want to look at Road to Germany.  And: They did NOT call McCain a Nazi; they simply implied that Nazi's would support him.  And, even if they did, they are well within their 1st Amendment rights to express that opinion.  But regardless of all that, if you want to add something about this, please find a reliable source to cite it.    

 I think the first thing about this topic is right.  The show often takes a Democrat viewpoint on various topics.  Some messages on the show are: republicans want to control everybody, undecided voters are stupid, etc.  There has to be some criticism on this.poketape   —Preceding unsigned comment added by   •    
 :*Criticism is fine, as long as it's well sourced and balanced by praise.  And ha