— Basically, what Kizzle said.   
 :1 It's clearly too much emphasis on a (so far) minor episode in his life for the main article.  But, there's no reason to delete the material from wikipedia, particularly since it may very well become quite pertinent within a couple months.  Also, as ArnoldReinhold point out, it is quite important as a White House scandal: reneging on the 'firing' promise, apparent failure of Bush to simply ask his senior staff about their involvement, etc.  I think that aspect is at least as important as many of the Clinton scandals with daughter articles Travelgate, Filegate, Kathleen Willey, etc. 
 :2 Just merge it into the Plame article or make it into its own article (with a summary and link here).  I did that a while back with the various Clinton scandals.  Makes the Clinton article readable, and gives room for the scandal articles to grow appropriately.  
 :3 As to length implying POV, of course it doesn't indicate that; it just reflects that it has been in the news a lot recently.  That always happens for current events articles.