", 22 February 2012 (UTC) 

 ===Need guideline for crime articles=== 
 It struck me as very foolish to claim, ""[T]he prosecution did not present any evidence against the accused"" and so, we need to have a crime-guideline that warns to avoid documented nonsense being fostered by sources. Because crime articles tend to foster a competitive attitude of ""winning"" the case, as either ""guilty"" or ""not guilty"" (or ""innocent""), then the guideline should be used to provide some ground rules as to just when bizarre claims are being made. For example, as noted for criminal trials in Italy, almost have of all ""primary-grade convictions"" in Italian courts are reversed during the secondary-grade trials of appeal. Meanwhile, the notion that the ""prosecution did not present any evidence"" should have been a red flag that the sources were false about such a claim. -  14:01"