" 
 :Yes, but it would seem to goes even beyond the ""illustrative"" concept, as to be illustrative there would have be at least one diff that demonstrated a concrete instance of the type of misconduct being illustrated. No?  
 :In retrospect, the Moderated discussion probably should not have happened, and the case settled as per the normal time frame and frame of reference. Some of the originally named parties had been sanctioned in relation to the same article in 2010. 
 :There would also seem, however, to be a lack of will to enforce sourcing policies against editors asserting their political ""beliefs"" over and against reliable sources. Some arbitrators have expressed an opinion that seems to be close to stating that strict enforcement of WP:RS would come close to engaging in judging content, while another arbitrator has made an FoF against me that includes a content related assertion. 見学/迷惑 "