" 

 ::This is utterly odd. Using words like ""nasty"" suggests too much of an identification with the subject of the wiki article. It's not our job here to determine whether things are nasty or not. And the suggestion that this is ""libellous"" also has no foundation. Is Phillips' suing Stonewall for defamation? On what basis can you justify libel in this article? I am concerned that the neutrality of this article is being undermined, by only keeping in references to ""nice"" awards and ""nice"" events. Can I remind you that this is not a hagiography. And on what grounds do you make the arguments for poor sourcing?   "