" 

 ===Headers for the history section=== 
 William's version: 
 :History 
 ::Before the Fleischmann–Pons experiment 
 ::Fleischmann–Pons experiment 
 ::Subsequent research 

 My version: 
 :History 
 ::Early research 
 ::Fleischmann–Pons experiment 
 ::Subsequent research 
 I prefer the second version of the headers, because they are briefer and more aesthetic. The second version of the headers convey the exact same information as the first; however, the second version also has brevity and internal symmetry. Little details are important in making a great article, for example, n-dashes instead of hyphens, correct placement of images, simple wording, non-repetitiveness etc. In this case, the second version of the headers have a nice internal symmetry—the ""Early research"" header reflects off the ""Fleischmein–Pons experiment"" and gives the symmetric ""Subsequent research"". The other version of the headers, unfortunately, appears to the reader as clumsy and wordy. And wordiness is something that this article definitely needs to cut down on. That is why the removal of a repetitive sentence in the above discussion was good. More is not better. If something is being repeated or overly wordy, it should be pared down.   "