" 

 ::You accused me of very serious POV and deleted all my edits which now you say only had a few issues about 'wording'. That is a very serious allegation to make, without discussing it first on any talk page and you did NOT (for those interested see the article Cham Albanians and the history section of the page). You stated yourself in the Cham Albanians article that most of the edits were 'ok'. I resorted to those measures in haste (after you deleted everything and called it POV !) as i was not aware of the procedures. As for you ""are out of serious arguments"", i think i made my point since you state in the same sentence ""the existence of a tiny community is ok to be mentioned"". Then you should only have deleted part of what was written, not the whole thing, and discussed the rest of the talk pages. As an editor you don't delete if you think something should be there, but needs more work. Your editing skills are questionable after these actions. Even words in your reply have issues about maybe what sentiments you have towards Albanians. For example Albanian Muslims were not ""hosted"", even though they were Greece's citizens. Citizens are not ""hosted"". Tourists, refuges, migrants and so on are ""hosted"". The living conditions of the Albanian community are important to be mentioned. Maybe not in the lead, but what Arthur Foss wrote should be in the footnote, as with other articles when something contentious is mentioned.  

   "