" 
 :1: The judge who ruled on the Dover Cove case needed to be placed under federal protection for his ruling which was neither comedic nor anti-religious (nor hatred) in any context (except it didn't admit Intelligent Design).  So we must accept the notion that this article will always be (even if it actually is) too positive and dismiss any non-constructive claims it is positive and all because it will always be perceived by some as offensive and anti-religious as easily as a neutral judge was targeted.  Any perceptions might be too clouded by irrational POV and any complaints would obviously need to extensively examined as a few bad eggs with no ability to make sound rational judgments may be around to further muddy the waters for those of us with clear heads or legitimate enhancements.    
 :2: This article should not be any more offensive to any particular religion than it is to any other group that are more centrally involved like the Kansas School Board, Kansas, or American, etc.  This was originally not a Parody of God or Religion as much as it was a retaliatory response to the subversive attempts to circumvent the system and (re)introduce ""Intelligent Design"" a rewritten hack of creationism into a school curriculum.  Most of the offense was taken by defenders of Creationism not necessarily by any particular religion, but any offense in removing ""God"" and replacing it with ""undetermined force"" should more offensive to more people (including even some religious people in having God taken out of the equation indifferent of the supposed good intension) than removing ""undetermined force"" and replacing it with ""Flying Spaghetti Monster"".   "