:I read it as the parenthetical clause within the first sentence being cited to that other source, and the rest of the sentence being cited to the church's website.  Why we have written the lead with such a long parenthetical escapes me; that just cries out for copyediting.  So does the whole article, but... I think the claim is accurately footnoted.  The first sentence of the next section says he did his graduate studies in Scotland, and is cited to a pair of books.  The Worldnetdaily article used in our article says the studies in Scotland were interrupted by the return to Kenya - but it could be interrupted after a masters and before a doctorate or it could be before either, impossible to tell.  Frankly, I think if we just clean up the parenthetical comment, the sourcing will become clearer, and the material to my eyes generally satisfies WP:SELFPUB, but I'm not certain it passes the relevance part of the test.  I've reviewed a bunch of our articles on prominent religious leaders, including both those widely respected (the current Pope, Billy Graham) and those best known for scandals (Bakker, Roberts) and none mentioned a degree in the introduction.  Some don't mention degrees at all, some mention them in a subsection about early life or education.  This fits with my general knowledge of the religious field; degrees are not of great importance to a minister.  They may or may not equip him or her for the work, but they are mostly irrelevant to their current and potential congregants.