" 

 == Your semi-protection of Biological warfare and other articles == 

 Hello, could you please review your protection of Biological warfare? It appears to have been excessive. Thank you.    

 :Erm, I am a bit worried about this. I have a better idea. Why not make an account? cheers,   ·   

 ::It looks as though 124 believes this is an example of an article with ""no real history of disruption"". I would disagree with that.   

 ::: Reworded, thank you.    

 Hello. Just to let you know that people are waiting for your reply here. Thank you.    

 :Thank you for unprotecting.    

 ==I owe you a pint== 
 Next time you are near Cork. Thanks for the archives, img etc.    
 :Hopefully one day - I am well and truly earthbound for a while (   ·   
 ::Patter of tiny feey? Or did somebody break your legs.    
 :::(ec on me own feckin' talk page) Yeah, eight of them. I don't fancy 24 hours on a plane with a lively 2 year old (though we might have to at some stage this year) - Australia is so goddamn far from anywhere....  ·   
 :::::Well thats a good reason. So amybe in 2027, when they are all grown up. Remind me first though.    

 Har, oh arse, it's nearly 1 am and I need to get up early. I hate Mondays...  ·   

 ==DYK for Banksia laevigata subsp. laevigata== 

 {| class=""messagebox standard-talk"" 
 |- 
 | 
 |On March 8, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Banksia laevigata subsp. laevigata, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. 
 |}     

 == Mass deletion == 

 I found this pragmatic statement interesting. I'd say there's absolutely no reason why we should need mass deletion here. The bare-bones of a consensus are already threshed out. BLPPROD should gives us a way of preventing new BLPs being kept for too long without sourcing, and we review the backlog in three months to see if the current clear up is still going apace, with a target of ensuring it is cleared in 12 months. Preferably this can be done without any deletions whatsoever. I'd certainly be happy to support your i