::So, wait, your claim is that you read the bit that said you may be blocked if you violate WP:3RR and you interpreted this to mean that you would not be blocked if you violated WP:3RR?  That's rather strange but I suppose you are free to read it that way.  You'd be wrong.  As to your source, please note that the article did not have a link to this citation and this was required under WP:V.  It looks like you are correct but being correct is not sufficient (again, see WP:V).