" 
 ::Atomaton, I'm not sure if you've written ""male to female"" when you meant ""female to male"", but in any case, the cited document (last footnote in lead) lists as its second recommendation ""Promoting male cirumcision should be recognized as an additional, important strategy for the prevention of heterosexually acquired HIV infection in men.""  I think if the lead mentions HIV reduction, it should specify ""in men"" or ""female to male"" or equivalent, to avoid giving a mistaken impression that there is any evidence that cirumcision reduces male to female transmission.  I still suggest inserting ""female to male"": would you please clarify, Atomaton, whether you oppose my suggested edit and why? ☺   "