" 

 == Re your continued picking -you have qestions? OK I have answers/ == 

 Re: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/GordonWatts&diff;=23521236&oldid;=23519711 

 your latest post on the RfA page: You added this in bold: Gordon's blatant refusal to let the subject drop despite many requests from other editors leads me to agree with Carnildo. Due to his extremely poor behavior in this RfA, I would oppose Gordon in any future RfA.  |   

 I replied, and since I express myself, I will merely quote and source it: 

 , you are mistaken: I indeed did ""let the subject drop"": http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:GordonWatts/RfA&diff;=23523348&oldid;=23522577#Admission:_The_RfA_can_legitimately_vote_me_down In this post, I state that I will not ask to be promoted if the vote goes against me; That being said, your attitude here is a chief reason why many leave Wikipeida [sic, spelling, lol]. If, however, you meant ""refusal to let the subject drop"" to mean ""the RfA process is broke"" as this ""subject,"" then, yes, you're right: I am not letting this drop at this time: ""If the rights of one are violated, the rights of all are at risk."" Thomas Paine    

 OK, I'll add one thing: Look, I'm not perfect, but I came here to try and help people, which I've been doing pretty well, in spite of walking into the middle of many a contentious edit war: 

 However, I'm probably qualified for a few extra tools of Admin (no big deal) -I'm not applying to be Steward or Bureaucrat, lol, but TWO THINGS: 

 Academic: If I'm really not qualified, then change the policy guidelines, OK? 
 Social: You do not need to make such a big deal out of this. Trust in God, for God's sake, and also realize this is only a volunteer organization. God really is trustworthy, and this really is just an unpaid job, and I'm not perfect, but I am probably correct all here. "