I'm with ^^^   

 == Speculation == 

 I try my best to remove speculation where I see it. As far as I can tell you are critising me for: 

 * only removing the speculative edits I thought wouldn't start a flame war on the 747 article. That whole list needs deleting IMHO. 
 * removing speculation that BA's operation of the A320 led to them placing further orders. How do you know they wouldn't have placed the order anyway? I agree mention of the A320 order should have been made on the page and I missed that is wasn't mentioned elsewhere. When you put the info back minus the PoV I was quite happy and left it, so why are you still moaning? 

 To top all that, you justify re-adding speculation that BA has plans for 747-400 replacement by saying I didn't remove some other bit of speculation during an earlier edit. Surely the correct thing would be for you to remove what I missed, not replace the speculation I removed.  

 [user: Mark83] 'The potential customers section on the 747 page is pure unsourced speculation' + 'It is perfectly valid to say that BA is an important potential client for either the A380 or 747-8' in the same paragraph!!  

 So, in summary, you think 'pure unsourced speculation' is 'perfectly valid' in an encyclopedia. 

 I despair!