" 

 Fra John. I have taken adequate time today to review the policies of wikipedia. 

 1) Verifiable statements are anything from reputable writings including media. They want us to write in our own words. We are not here to verify whether the article or work is true, but to use it as a basis to write an article. According to the policy, an individual needs sufficien verifiable facts to sustain a spot in Wikipedia. The only verifiable sources are those written against Schuckardt(media reports). Your reign of Mary or whatever it is you use is not sufficient because it is not accessable. You are in clear violation of this because your proof is insufficient and it adds unecessary fat to the article. 

 2) Personal attacks are those directed toward an individual. ""Schuckardt is the leader of a desstuctive cult,"" is simply a statement not an attack. Most of the edits you make are not personal attacks but rather statements. Again you are in clear violation of this point. 

 3) This one I'll give you, this is not a personal forum, although, we express valid points that you consider personal attacks. And, you don't give straight answers. 

 4) NPOV or neutral point of view, deals with conflicting points of view. We clearly have this in the article. It also states that if someone is directly involved with an article subject, he or she SHOULD NOT CONTRIBUTE. The reason being is that they will be bias. You are directly involved with Schuckardt and you clearly state that you admire him as an individual. You are in violation of this policy. We are not because we have nothing to do with him and this article is only about him. 
 Don't preach to me about being in violation of wiki policy, because I see your bias in using wikipedia as a platform to push your group's point of view. The truth of the matter is that Schuckardt is a contoversial subject and the facts are this(for the last time):  
 1) He started a group in defiance of Vatican Council II 
 2) He received an illicit ordination and Consecration from the Old Catholic lineage 
 3) He imposed stringent rules on the faithful  
 4) He was using massive amounts of perscription drugs 
 5) He was denounced for being fanatical and for homosexuality 
 6) He fled Washington  
 7) He operated his organization in different States and settled in the Seattle area. 
 8) He continues to impose these fanaticle rules and control while being elusive 

 Fra these are not personal attacks, but the facts whether you agree or not. And I can provide the evidence. The Counterclaims section and Aryan Nations section have NO merit in the article and should be removed. You have yet to show me the evidence. As for what I have written, there are no personal attacks and if you remove one word you will be in violation. 

 George Wagner 28 MAR 06"