"::::::::::::BlackKITE has accused me of ""edit warring,"" just now in the sentence above, based only on only one edit and where people agree I am essentially right.  You have told me to stop beating a dead horse  when I was doing no such thing.  BlackKITE has accused me of using trickery, editing similar to a sock puppet, and being banned, but you did not explain the person who banned me had her admin rights stripped for summarily banning people.  Then BlackKITE accused me of vandalism or incipient vandalism    

 ::::::::::::Frankly, every single time BlackKITE has said something to me has been in a manner inconsistent with good wikipedian citizenship, even here in BlackKITE's statement where BlackKITE claims he/she has not done the things he/she has.  I was trying to give Cheeser1's advice to take a break a chance, but not if it means not responding to BlackKITE's further ad hominem argument.   

 ::::::::::::Now the MMfA link has been removed and replaced with the underlying AFA link.  But the text remaining in the wiki page comes only from the MMfA link and not from the AFA link or from any other source.  All this time has gone by and there's no other source presented by anyone besides the MMfA one for the claim that the AFA thinks Judaism leads to criminality or whatever?  I don't care what the facts are, just that an awful accusation is being broadcast to the world based purely on the view of a writer at MMfA, an organization obviously opposed to the subject of the wiki page.  That is fundamentally unfair; I'm sure wikipedia does not support that.  Therefore I'll be removing it soon, but I'll do what Cheeser1 suggests and lay low for a little. Hopefully, someone will do the right thing before I have too.  

 ::::::::::::I'm sorry I was forced out of my laying low by further false accusations by BlackKITE.    

 "