" 
 == The introduction  latest change == 
 I dared change the introduction today . I left many phrases that , to my opinion , would better have their place in the main article .  
 I think that ""The MMR vaccine controversy refers to claims , primarily raised by a 1998 paper published in the British medical journal The Lancet[1]that some form of autism may be triggered by the MMR vaccine, a vaccine against measles, mumps, and rubella.The debate around this hypothesis – which has since been infirmed by numerous studies around the world – immediatly stirred a wider – and sometimes very emotional- controversy with a sustained media coverage due not only to the effect of such claims on the immunisation rate but also to several disturbing aspects of Dr Wakefield's work ,as unearthed by a journalist of the Times and that would drive to the longest GMC inquiry ever done ."" could be enough ; some stress on the scientific consensus might be added ; mention of the latest decision of the GMC needed . But for the rest  in the different section of the article .What do you think of that ?   "