" 

 == Back to the lead section == 

 We are now going to completely re-work the lead section. 

 The failed Feature Article attempt verifies that the lead section sucks.  What the lead section fails to do is identify the Importance of this dead female.  We fail to convey the the end of 2003 and March 2005 as big events.  Factions formed.  Money flowed.  Politics.  American Politics.  The lead section must give the broad scope and do so tersely.  Yes, there are subpages, but this the captone.  The executive plan. 

 Try this on for size: The court rulings were uniform: TS's parents (TSP) were wrong and Michael was right.   TS's parent's efforts merely delayed the inevitable.  Much like the South in the American Civil War, TS's parents merely fought a Lost Cause.  They simply spend a bunch of money, and had a lot of publicity that stretched out over seven years. 

 When you put it in perspective, it loses some glamour!  No pretty young face.  No propaganda.  All that stupid fighting within Wikipedia: you just forget about it. 

 I have presented my case that the pretty photo does NOT belong in the lead section. It goes to the ""early life"" where it belongs.  She was NOT notable when she had that pretty face.  The pretty face is merely a lie proprigated the TSP.  That pretty woman was gone forever.  If we put any such photo into the lead section, it will be the REAL photo.  Brain-dead Terri in bed.  Drooling. Snot running out of nose.  Full bedpan.  THAT is what the judge had to make a deicision.  We need THAT view in order to understand what the judges faced.  Otherwise we are simply re-trying the case in the press!  That is not how it works. 

 If people have trouble seeing Terri's Soul in that drooling, shitting person, then that is their problem.  That is simply their inabiilty to face the reality of this woman. Some superficial you people may not like that.  Tough. 

 And the courts are just going to be the same old monotonous story: Delay by TSP via appeal and then loss incurred by TSP. 

 The Florida legislature and the U.S. Congress actions get mentions in the lead section.  THAT was why this story ever mattered at all. Whever this female was is just a pile of ashes now. TS WAS notable. 

 We need a quick statement about the left and right involved. There are a LOT more right-wingers, a lot more right-wing money and a lot more right-wing propaganda involved.  There was some leftist activities, but not nearly as much.  It is all that right-wing power and money that is going to emerge when Abortion comes around again as the other life/death issue. 

 We have tried several times to get feedback.  Negotiation.  Comprosmise.  This bullshit about maintaining the status quo on this crappy article with its crappy lead section is over.  It does not matter how intricate the footnotes are or how perfect the syntax is if the reader has to slog through it and get no help in recognizing the historical context. 

 The historical context is these right-wing events: 
 *Elizabeth Morgan 
 *Terri Shchiavo 
 *Abortion 
 If they win next, maybe on abortion, I can accept that.  If the right loses, I can accept that too, but I do not really care very much. 

 This bullshit about she-said-the-he-said-that blah blah is BULLSHIT!  The nurses affidavit barely merits a mention because the judge dismissed it, pratically out-of-hand. 

 This bullshit about Canadians and British pro-lifers coming and stroking the hysteria about this fairly-easy-to-write aritcle will END. 

 If that Canadian Elnglish major Marskell, who did no research, should KEEP OUT!  He had his chance to strut his ownership arrogant reverting attitude all over this article for months and his turn is over. 
   "