" 

 == About you ideologic vendalism about race and intelligence ==  
 I sent a warning. If you persist in your behavior you will be banned temporarily.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by    
 :This from a person who stick in stuff into the appropriate article, couldn't be bothered with citations, and stick  a table where there is just a summary of the main topic about it and a pointer to the main article about it.   

 == Quote included == 

 The third source does indeed. It explains how the new right (a far right as clarified in the book) was shaped and continues to exist. One of the manifestations is Conservapedia. As for the second, I realized that my interpretation of the source was a little WP:ORish, the new source explicitly states that Conservapedia is an example of right-wing ideology (with a specific example being its treatment of Barack Obama).    

 ==Soft redirect== 
 Oops! We don't want to bypass the talk page. Thanks    

 == Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Climate_change_alarmism == 

 I feel you are acting in bad faith, and so have opened this.    

 == Where a cabal meet for POV pushing? == 

 What on earth is this? I really don't understand. Do you mean FTN? Do you include me? Andy the Grump? What POV do you think we are pushing?    
 :Yes I most certainly do. Did you not get that from what I wrote at that noticeboard atWikipedia:Fringe_theories/Noticeboard#Global_warming_conspiracy_theory where I clearly stated I thought what kind of POV you pushed? Well I'll quote ""So overall I would ask editors here to stop looking at articles from just the perspective of whether they promote scientific truth or not. That blinds to a lot of other things. Just looking at 'climate change denial', oh that's about a POV in a debate. It isn't even part of the debate."" Wikipedia is not a vehicle to push the TRUTH like Conservapedia, a battle van to destroy all erroneous thought and articles are viewed throuhgh the lens of conforming to the light.    
 ::Ha ha. Alternatively, the ANYTHINGGOES cabal has forced the VERIFIABILITY cabal into alliance with the TRUTH cabale. Alternatively, there are no cabals.    
 :::Well I think your cosy little coterie has gone badly astray. That little contribution does not exactly raise my expectations.    
 ::::I have a cosy coterie? In my dreams.    

 == 'Curve' geometry for Railway Applications == 

 Thanks for responding in the reference desk thread. 

  
 The other day I'd found these  (http://www.norgrove.me.uk/permanent_way_notes.htm) 
 and was trying to understand them , hence my questions in the reference desk thread. 

  
 What I was trying to  was work out how to map a point (x,z) in Catersian space (i.e points relative to a straight line track) to 
 an equivalent point on a curve with a defined radius r, being an arc defined by chord AB. 

 In terms of possible transformations of straight to curve, I'm not yet understanding it all fully. 

 What I'd like to have is some functions  as follows  

 i) 'slide' , that is a  translation P(x,z) -> P'(x',z),  where P' is on a curve defined by a chord AB. (Note the z value doesn't change.) 

 ii)'bend' , translates a pint P(x,z) on chord AB to P'(x',z'), where P' is on the arc defined by AB.   
 Distances parrallel to AB (before the transformation) get scaled, whereas distances perpendicular to AB are rotated. 

 iii)'curve', translates a point P(x,z)->P'(x',z'), where P' is on the arc defined by AB. 
 Distances parallel to AB (before the transformation) become 'arc lengths' w.r.t arc AB. 
 Distances perpendicular to AB(befo