" 

 === My hatnote update at Nostradamus === 

 It wasn't a question of notability when I performed this edit. I believe someone can easily mis-type the word, arrive at a ""strange"" page and become confused, hence, the purpose of the hat (see the ones at Yamucha and Yum cha). Want another? Try Rogue and Rouge. Or Salon and Saloon, etc. Point being, I see no harm in it. Thoughts? Please reply on your talk page, or on Talk:Nostradamus. Prefer keeping all discussions in one page.   •   

 Above comment copied from my talk page.    

 :So my edit summary was a bit confused: ""moved Nas' work over to the dab page... there is not reason that Nastradamus is more notable than some of the other items there"" - what I meant to say that there was no obvious way to elevate Nastradamus (a different spelling but also inspired by Nostradamus)  above the other articles which needed to be disambiguated. So it makes sense to treat them all somewhat equally on the disambiguation page. 
 :*I will admit that given the concerns about including even one hatnote on the page, I didn't think there would be immediate consensus to start putting even more... and that factored into my decision to revert. 
 :*The specific hatnote implies that not only is the article not what some are looking for (for which the other uses links will work), but that there is a likelihood of confusion:""Not to be confused with Nastradamus."" 
 :**I think someone looking for anything vaguely like Nas' album is not going to think that Nostradamus might be what they are looking for...  
 :*The examples you cire, Yamucha and Yum cha are an isolated pair of confusable articles with no related disambiguation page (and really, with just two articles using two distinct names, that's fine) - the hatnotes are the sole disambiguation needed. 
 :* the other two are pairs of disambiguation pages, where hatnotes and disambiguation links are basically free to flourish. 
 :*I would draw your attention to more similar cases where there is a dominant topic with a subordinate disambiguation page, like MP3 or Monk. 
 :* Or for that matter, the Nas article itself... which would only be hurt by adding a series of WP:POINT hatnotes on top: 
 :**Not to be confused with Naas, a town in Ireland. Not to be confused with Naval air station. and so on. 
 :** for me, personally, Nas means network attached storage, and clearly Nas does not cover that... so I go to the dab page. 
 : Anyway, as i noted, I have added Nastradamus to the Nostradamus (disambiguation) page as another possible misspelling. I have no objection to moving up to a hatnote on the disambiguation page, but I don't think that is really necessary or would improve things. I do not see a good reason to include it and only it as a hatnote to Nostradamus... I think a person looking for the album will be able to follow to the disambiguation page. Thoughts?   "