::::1RRs protect the status quo but they don't endorse it.  The intent is to avoid the needless inclusion of disputed material and then reverting and then it being put back in again.  By putting it back in you only continued it.  If you had sources or changes you should have put them on the talk page.  There are editors who want to work out the disagreements on that page but they are being drown out by the edit warring.  By just coming into the article, having never edited on it before or participated and then putting back in disputed material is the equivalent to tossing a grenade into it and was not at all helpful.