: A discussion on a  is no Wikipedia policy. The main context for the discussion was edit-warring on the native language in the articles. Till the discussion actually translates into a Wikipedia policy and is reflected in the Wikipedia space, it has no status. Also, please note that  was the first one to remove the native language stating that IPA is preferred, and there had been no edit-warring on this issue in the article. As such, your revert is unjustified. May I also point out that your other reversion in the article was also unjustified, as matter added to the lead was already in the main article (with source), and usually does not need to be sourced again when summarized in the lead. Please go through the Wikipedia policies in greater detail and understand them completely. Moreover, your edit summary and writing suggests that you have a weak grasp over English and don't understand the meaning of what you write, as I do not believe you would deliberately demean other editors. Happy learning and editing!