It would be a BLP violation to accuse Hilton of engaging in hate speech in article space.  In article talk space it's probably within the bounds of acceptability - to do it in the course of reasonable on-topic discussion.  However, it is not hate speech by a long shot.  Calling women bitches when one is upset or wishes to provoke is simple sexism, which is a long way from hate speech.  Is there any argument that Hilton was doing any more than using a sexist expletive towards someone he considered homophobic?  Repeating the claim again and again all over the encyclopedia is soapboxing, and it is not leading to productive discussion.  We get the idea, it's a bad thing to say.  The real question is whether it's of due weight and suitably relevant to Prejean's notability.  Normally, people calling each other names is not so noteworthy.  What's the argument that it is?  -