:: Ok. Yes, it needs help, and I don't doubt it has caused some contention because it reads more like a list of facts than a cohesive story of sides that explains motivations for anything. I'm completely unfamiliar with this conflict. While that may improve the article in neutrality, I'm not sure if the sources used for the article are trustworthy, or if they come from papers and sources that have foregone biases I'm unfamiliar with. That's a minor concern of mine right now. 

 :: If you can get the editors participating in the mediation to agree, have them indicate so. If they do that, I will take a few days to become familiar with the sources, read the entire story, and rewrite the article in a sandbox off the talk page. Please keep in mind that I have an article nominated for GA right now, and one I hope to nominate in a week, so I'll be in between for some of this time. At the absolute best, a week from Wednesday may be the soonest it would be completed. Since the best never happens, I would say 2 - 3 weeks would be reasonable to predict when the rewritten article would be posted. Your thoughts?