" 
 :Find a source for me not being right. 
 ::I've reported this on WP:AN/3RR, since it's pretty obvious that it's pointless arguing with you about this. a  

 Once again, please provide a source for your claims. I will block you for disruption if you continue reverting. a  

 Until you admit I am right, I will keep a Neutaliry dispute template on this page.   
 *Sorry, that's not how it works. I've blocked you for a week. a  

 *I'll add something: Admitting any single user is right and holding a neutral point of view are mutually exclusive.  If android79, myself, Zoe, Hall Monitor, Etyheryery, TheGrza, and Gator1 feel one way (among many others who I'm sure haven't gotten involved), and you alone feel another yet refuse to cite sources for your extraneous claims, that's not a dispute. It's some combination of trolling, Humpty Dumptyism, and disrupting wikipedia to prove a point. I was just about to remove the POV template when I realized it had been.   

 == Speedy delete == 

 The speedy delete tag added by user Jake. Remington to  is not appropriate. If you want to propose deletion, add a {{AfD}} and follow the Article for deleton policy. Thanks.   • @  

 :Agree Jake. Remington has racked up 5 warnings on his userpage, next one should go to admins      

 ::After reverting AGAIN, have added Jake to Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism 

 ==Elitism== 
 Why do you refuse to discuss your edits,and instead claim I am the ""North Carolina"" vandal and ""Remington and the Rattlesnakes""? I will not tolerate this from the Wikiquinns. I know Remington, but he is too low-class to be my friend, although we are both involved in this stupid dispute. 

  

 ==Protection== 
 We usually only do 24 hour protections for vandals, but Jake and friends are still hitting us pretty hard, so I'll extend this a bit.   

 :Been a couple of days. No sign of Jake and his groupies. ) I'll put this on my watchlist and reprotect if necessary.  "