" 

 == Re: Administrative nomination: Please consider this posting == 

 We were in an AfD dispute last year. Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ernie_%28Family_Guy%29 

 I noticed that you removed Image:IM IN UR WIKI RVRTING UR EDITS lolcat.jpg ""I'm in your wiki reverting your edits"", but based on the complaints above, your poor behavior in nominating AfDs has not changed.  

 As  another user who left Wikipedia, liking it to your behavior: 

 :I had become involved in the “articles for deletion” venue, where I began becoming the target of immense hatred...All the while, I wondered why the hell I was doing it. I began to realize that, for me, the nasty truth was that much of it was a power trip. Oh, don’t get me wrong: my actions were taken because, in part, I did truly believe that the articles I nominated didn’t belong. But it was indeed a manifestation of a darker side of me — I enjoyed the fact that I could hurt someone — make them angry and mad and defensive. Because in my real life, that’s not something I do. I’m Mister Friendly with nearly everyone I meet, and I’m actually a really nice guy in about 99% of circumstances. But something about the process brought out the worst in me — aggression and adrenaline, all funneled through a keyboard without danger of being punched in the face. Resisting the temptation to say “fuck you, fanboy,” and instead turning it into a passive-aggressive “I truly believe that your article is not notable, and would remind you that Wikipedia has policies regarding not attacking your fellow editors and being civil to them” (ah, did I have a gift for the bull-lingo) ...I got a dark thrill out of seeing people froth and rage and turn into drooling rabid ready-for-heart-attack messes because they weren’t getting the fight they wanted out of me. And another side of me looked at that dark thrill and went, “What the fuck are you doing, Mike?” 

 Yes, I sincerely believe your deletion of the Ernie (Family Guy) article was in bad faith. I am glad that you have the moral certainty and superiority, in your infinite wisdom, to decide what is ""good"" and what is ""bad"".  

 I want other editors who come here with grievances about your wikilawyering and manipulation of wikipolicy to push your power trips, to read the above quote, and understand why you probably do it. 

 In addition, many editors who want to become admins start by putting pages up for deletion. I hope this quote and the way you push your self-righteous power trips is what causes you to lose your admin nomination.  

 I am not the first nor the last person who will direct their ""immense hatred"" toward your ""aggression and adrenaline"" to ""hurt someone"".   

  
 :I'm a bit disappointed because I figured sufficient time had passed that you might have reconsidered some of these opinions. Ernie was deleted by consensus of Wikipedia editors, and for good reason. You have no reason to insult me on my Talk page. I have to ask you please to not post further harangues on my Talk page. /    "