" 
 :I'm concerned about the two because you put the fact tag in for the exact opposite reasons you removed a bunch of info this time. Both of which support your erroneous rationale to remove the images. You cant have it both ways. Day before yesterday, you were demanding the images to be removed because that info wasnt in them. Now you claim you're improving the articles by removing such info. You spent days on the talk pages here claiming you wanted the images removed because the info wasnt there - something you fulfilled (the lack of info) by you personally deleting the info., Three days before you were claiming that there were no cites to support anything for the images. All your arguments and actions all go back to you wanting (as you've made clear) the images removed. That, btw, more and more (due to those actions) is bringing me back to your first statement where the bigger reason was (you wanting) censorship. 
 :Also, I didnt miss #5. You missed the links we have all left you that explain the policies and guidelines you are trying to misuse. All I can say is this: 
 :*Any repeated attempts to remove information (as you just did yesterday) that you have claimed already wasnt there, as justification to remove the images, will earn you a vandalism warning. 
 :*Repeating the same erroneous claims (and understanding of policy here) will not change anything. 
 :I've got nothing else to say that I haven't already said earlier. I will not assume good faith on any action you perform on this article. I will (if someone doesnt beat me to it) issue a warning each and every time you (against every consensus reached on a total of over 35 talk page archives) remove information. Your misinterpretation of the rules does not trump 35 pages of discussion. I may not have made that clear in the past, so hopefully this time I have. Assuming I have, you will probably find a bunch of other editors who will take this as a warning given, that warrants warnings (or worse) for each and every time you do a disruptive and/or contentious and/or vandalism edit to the article. So... why not spend your time at Village Pump recommending that the polices get changed?  / "