" 
 :::::::That BBC report said for instance ""Mohammed Shafiq, chief executive of of the Ramadhan Foundation, accused Pakistani community elders of ""burying their heads in the sand"" on the issue of on-street grooming."" I want Wikipedia to summarize things calmly and dispassionately and let them speak for themselves without us sticking in our point of view or trying to censor 'shit like this'. How will removing stuff like that help? Do you really want people to get their facts from fascist sites or suchlike and trust them more than Wikipedia? We can state things with a neutral point of view aand be trusted, not be yet another evangelical site on the web preaching its own biased version of things and untrusted by anyone except their loyal band of fans or converts. The encyclopaedia that can be edited by anyone.   "