" 

 == Defunct and on-hiatus conventions == 

 Per WP:NOTDIR, do we need a list of every convention that has gone defunct? Some the ones listed do not have the sources needed to pass WP:Notability when it comes to events. Here is a breakdown of what I see: 

 *Anime America: Convention article is sourced by one primary source (Animecons.com), other than that how is it notable?  Deleted  
 *Anime East: Another convention sourced fully by Animecons.com, the convention ran for just two years. ""The second anime convention to be held on the east coast of the United States"" Might be notable if it can be sourced.  Deleted  
 *Anime Express: Anime convention ran for 13 years but yet no secondary sources are present in the article. Peak attendance at a mere 1,100 people in 2006.  Deleted  
 *Anime South: Article looks okay. (One link needs work)   
 *AnimeCon: Article looks good.   
 *AniZona: Article looks okay.   
 *Aurora-Con: Convention ran for only three years with one source that is not from animecons.com. 
 *Big Apple Anime Fest: Article looks good.   
 *Chibicon: Only sourced by Animecons.com.  Prodded 
 *Daigacon: Notable? Held in 2007 and in 2009 Needs major work. 
 *JACON: Nine year running convention just sourced by Animecons.com. 
 *Kunicon: See problem below in discussion.  Fixed  
 *PersaCon: Article is sourced only by ANN and Animecons.com. 
 *Providence Anime Conference: Article looks good.   
 *Shoujocon: Article looks okay.   
 *Tomo-Dachi: Article looks okay.   
 *UppCon: Article looks okay.   
 *Yuricon Article looks okay.   

 Thoughts? -    
 :*I think that we shoudl keep them for the notable conventions, but not for the ones that aren't notable. If the convention was merged into another one, it'd probably be better to merge and redirect to an article for that con if we have it and if not, maybe make the convention page if it passes NG.  "