" 
 :Regarding ""Ivanov"" being the most common last name in Estonia, I can very well imagine that could be true (which raises an interesting question of why it is so, since it is definitely not the most common last name in Russia; but I digress).  However, I am always very skeptical of statements which are sourced to a media reference (or even a handful of media references, for that matter).  I've voted to delete ""Putinjugend"", ""phone call to Putin"", and a score of other things based precisely on my belief that media references should only be used in addition to reliable academic sources, not instead of them.  Media these days (even those which used to be considered reputable, and still are, by the force of inertia) are hell-bent on finding sensationalist material even among the most mundane of the news, and they all seem to have an agenda to push (market segmentation in action, I guess).  Academia, at least, does not have that drive for profits the media do (although even they are, of course, prone to yielding to pressure when it comes to grant money). 
 :Anyway, to cut long story short, if you want my support regarding the Ivanov statement, I'm afraid I can't offer it to you (unless you can find better sources, that is).  As for the situation surrounding the statement (stalking, accusations, all that kind of crap), it does look ugly.  In the past, I would have probably looked into all this, tabulated the actions of all sides into nice little tables, mapped them to the appropriate policies/guidelines, sprinkled with my interpretations, and presented the output as my educated opinion, but I don't do that anymore.  First, it is an enormous waste of time, and second, it never seems to affect anyone or anything.  The best this approach of mine ever produced was both sides politely agreeing that both sides acted inappropriately on various occasions, perhaps even agreeing on letting that particular issue go, but later this would all repeat all over again over something else.  Frankly, I am sick and tired of all this bickering.  I can present logical intepretations until cows come home (by now you've had a chance to see that), I can scorn the bickering parties left and right, but at the end of the day it always turns out that everyone would be better served by heading directly to ArbComm.  When it's a minor misunderstanding, I can help; when it's a full-scale war, I cannot. 
 :I realize this is not the kind of response you expected, but please try to understand why I decided not to help.  In the beginning, things were fairly simple with you and them.  Even though I may not have been overly enthusiastic about getting involved then, that was mostly due to various external reasons, and I did try to help when I could.  Now, it seems that fires are burning in all directions, and I just can't serve as a one-man arbitration committee; that's not what I signed up to be here for (had I wanted that, I'd just run for an ArbComm seat).  I do like you because even though my views of the world are more in line with Biophys' than yours, you nevertheless manage to remain neutral (as is humanly possible) when writing content.  You also understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a billboard for political statements (although the creation of ""eSStonia"" did cast some doubts).  I cannot in good conscience respect a person who would write something like ""phone call to Putin"" and not only present it as true encyclopedic material, but fiercly defend it when pointed out that it is, in fact, not, and completely ignore several requests for finding qualified sources.  To me, that's a giveaway that the person is not here to contribute, s/he is here to advocate, and no matter how much I agree with the cause being advocated, my duty here is first and foremost to the encyclopedia. 
 :In the end, if you want my sincere advice about how to proceed, an advice coming from a human being (rather than a human being in an admin role), it is ""fuck 'em"".  Let them write their idiotic little pieces about whatever flashy neologisms they can find in whatever ""sources"" they can lay their hands on.  Our readers are not complete morons; they will ignore articles where bias is so blatantly obvious.  Don't feed the trolls; let them fuckers starve.  When they leave due to the lack of attention (and leave they will), the cleanup can commence.— • ; 15:36, January 30, 2009 (UTC)"