" 

  
 ::*I and others have removed this link repeatedly since, as I explained the first time I removed it, the term is not commonly used to refer to alternative energy and  the page alternative energy does not list ""free energy"" as a synonym.  explained all this most clearly on the talkpage  on 01:30, July 21, 2008, but that didn't stopped Gdewilde from reinserting the link an hour latter. For the record, since June  and  have also (re)inserted the link, and myself, , , and  have removed it. 

 A single google search shows that free energy is a term used to describe alternative energy. 

 You are a liar. 

  
 Instances of your wp:Tag team lie: 

 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Free_energy&diff;=228055770&oldid;=228048809 

 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Free_energy&diff;=226922461&oldid;=226916836 

 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Free_energy&diff;=226909721&oldid;=226893602 

 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Free_energy&diff;=226887857&oldid;=226870559 

 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Free_energy&diff;=226685716&oldid;=226683901 

 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Free_energy&diff;=226095561&oldid;=226086991 

 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Free_energy&diff;=226086202&oldid;=226085484 

 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Free_energy&diff;=224743706&oldid;=224716365 

 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Free_energy&diff;=224423129&oldid;=224422380 

 http://www.google.com/search?q=free+energy 

 85 000 000 search results showing you are a group of liars removing the description from the free energy article page. 

 ::*Gdewilde's second bullet ""you are not familiar with the term""—a clear contravention of WP:NPA: ""Comment on content, not on the contributor."" (For the record, I'm a chemist and have worked in the American alternative energy industry (both biofuels and solar) so if the term were commonly used, I would know.) 

 This means you are familiar with free energy, then there is this article about free energy suppression that makes your lie even more obvious. 

 ::*Forth bullet: ""Lets anounce Consensus!! "". At that point, (18:44, July 19, 2008), myself, Arthur Rubin, and Oli Filth had all removed the link to alternative energy, and Gdewilde/go-here.nl and Reddi had readded it. Perhaps ""consensus"" was too strong a term to use, but clearly the majority view was that the term does not belong. Furthermore, with exception of this and this revert by Reddi, when reinserting the link, no one ever provided a rationale for it's inclusion, meanwhile in removing the link, Arthur, Oli, and I always provided a reason. 

 Your reasoning was 100% lies, anyone can see that. 

   "