::::Please stop, LOL. You are so humorous. Great parody. What fun. I have added back one criticism.  It is from a published source, the SPLC magazine.  It is presented with full cites and full attribution.  It is accurate.  It is placed in the subsection you agree is where criticism should go (I disagree, but you arbitrarily revert any attempt to to seriously edit the article.  So let's start by discussing this addition, not your deletions of large blocks of text. It so much more constructive and collective, don't you agree? -)