::::::The article is POV no matter what, because its not even a encyclopedia entry, is a personal opinion, there is ways and ways of writing about a particular theme. 

 ::::::If the rules are unfair, then first must be decided so, and must officially recognized as that way so it may became part of an encyclopedia, and that’s a bit hard to do so. 

 ::::::Even if many people think that military tribunals are unfair, that doesn’t make it true de-facto, in past centuries everyone believed earth was flat… 

 ::::::This article should inform about what is, how it works, why can it be called on etc.. a military tribunal, then it can be a section dedicated to criticisms of the system, and accusations of unfairness based on certain rules of the procedure can be tell about etc.. 

 ::::::The article doesn’t even comply with a minimum of quality.. 

 ::::::Abortion nurses also some times refuse to work because they cannot stomach the procedure, however abortion article does not draw the conclusion of: “considering all the factors abortion is a brutal procedure” etc.. (even if many people regard it as that), however it does have “The debate” section that is how this article should have. 

 ::::::I am going to rewrite the article, once I get it, in about a day, we can continue the debate of whatever what I writed is correct or not...