" 

 Most ""outsiders"" have no knowledge of Durham codes, but it seemed likely to me that this anonymous contributor probably has some direct connection to the University/the Society, and that his/her contributions come from an authoritative source. It is good to know that this appears to be so. I agree that Wiki contributions should be judged by their merit, rather than by who makes them. But the source has some relevance, especially when someone else contemplates making an alteration.    "