"""So basically, you are telling me that your search for ""Garrett Lisi"" makes any other articles null and void that are under Antony Garrett Lisi, or other tags.""  No, I actually didn't say anything of the kind.  I just stated a simple fact.  And I might point out that ""Garrett Lisi"" will find anything ""Antony Garrett Lisi"" finds.  ""And the same day that you made your claim was also the day that the Indian article came out.  You should have checked before making your claim.""   Has i occurred to you that the article might have started appearing on google news after I did the search that day?   ""If that isn't lying, I don't know what is. ""  How about what you are saying here? ""Perhaps you should give Justin Khoury a wiki if you find him notable""  Did you read what I wrote?  My point was that Khoury isn't particularly notable by Wiki's criterion, and yet he is far more notable than Lisi.  As for why I care...  this is a case where a huge amount of misinformation has been spread about this theory.  Millions of people across the world read that this guy is the next Einstein, etc. etc., all because he hyped his own theory (which is close to nonsense) and took in one credulous science journalist.  I'd like for wikipedia to tell the truth, not the hype.  At the very least it should be pointed out that 13 years after his first paper this guy has had zero impact on physics and is regarded as a crackpot by almost the whole field.  (Incidentally 13 years after his first paper Einstein had revolutionized physics and was the most famous scientist in the world.) 

 "