" 

 ====Yes → Yes (band)==== 
 This move has already taken place by doing a copy/paste. Someone needs to delete the Yes (band), which was a redirect to Yes, and then move the Yes to [[Yes (band). The reason for this request is that the vast majority of edits to Yes were related to the band and not the word.    
 *Yes is currently a simple dictdef.  Yes (band) should be at Yes with a link to Wiktionary for the word.    
 **I have no problem with that. I didn't move the article, I just wanted to get the page history straightened out.   
 *I've reverted it, and left a note on the Talk page to bring the argument here, and to use the Move tab if it should be moved. IMHO, someone looking for the word will go to Wiktionary, while someone looking for Yes at Wikipedia is more likely looking for the band, so I think it should stay that way. (i.e. 'what violet/riga said')   
 **That works for me.   
 *Support move to Yes (band). Yes should be a disambig. See Yes (disambiguation) for some ideas.    17:04, 2005 Jan 1 (UTC) 
 *Unless someone presents some other well-known things known only by the name Yes, then the band should be at Yes. I see nothing at Special:Allpages/Yes that would be referred to primarily (or even occasionally) by only the word Yes. ≠  
 *I was the original editor, and I'm willing to admit that I may have goofed.  I saw some similarity between Yes and Rush, both of which are common words with other uses, but I admit that the band may be the commonest use of Yes.  A quick search at IMDB, for instance, showed one art-house film, some foreign films, and a couple of shorts.  And I probably didn't wait long enough for a consensus, didn't use ""Move"", etc.  I haven't been around here long enough to know which way the precedents point.   
 *Yes. Support the move.  06:42, 2005 Jan 3 (UTC) 
 *Support the move. As the name of a band, 'Yes' will only be known to a minority of readers.   
 *Support. My rule would be that a secondary meaning always calls for disambiguation. —  19:28, 2005 Jan 15 (UTC)"