" 

 == Polish Wikipedia on the etymology of ""baramin"" == 

 I happened across the Wikipedia article in Polish on ""Baramin"", and got a machine translation for this segment, which I found interesting. I don't know where these ideas come from (although I agree with them). I suppose that this would not pass the criticism that it is ""Original research"", but here it is, in somewhat tidied up form (I can't read Polish, but some of the changes are obvious): 

 The word ""baramin"" comes from a combination of two Hebrew words appearing in the Book of Genesis בָּרָא bar - created and מִין mîn - type. Translation mîn words as ""kind"", is a discussion for two reasons: 
 1. mîn word does not exist in Hebrew, in the Bible, there is only as a root verbal derivatives, such as לְמִינֵהוּ leminehu. 
 2. is used only a dozen times, hence the exact meaning is uncertain. 
 The importance of words mîn is not certain, therefore, different interpretations of its meaning by present biblical scholars.  Some argue that this term should be construed as ""the same zradzające the same."" Others will underline the ""division"", ""decoupling"" as the core message of the words mîn.  One of the sources of these differences is the fact that the term is used mîn in the Hebrew Bible rarely - 31 times (30 times in the Pentateuch of Moses and once in the Book of Ezekiel). In all these cases, the term refers to the plants and animals, and displayed with prepend l e (under). Some note that mîn is never in the Book of Genesis used to create a human being (although this is the nieuznawanej by Protestants for natchnioną Paper Syracha). While God created plants and animals ""in accordance with their mîn,"" people have been created in the image and likeness of God. Etymology words mîn is also uncertain. Some of them relate to Arab MANA (divided, split), however, the Arabic word is much younger than Hebrew and did not appear to have a relationship with him. Most of interpretation, therefore, goes towards understanding mîn as ""some kind of breakdown"" or ""separated group.""  So God created plants and animals in accordance with their division, chapter. 
  However, notwithstanding the strict meaning of the word, it is not narrative in the Book of Genesis closely related to reproduction but to the establishment. Only on the creation of fruit trees (cf. Gen 1, 11-12), the term seems in some way connected with reproduction. In other cases mîn refers to the creation and not for reproduction (cf. Gen 1, 21, 24-25). Moreover, when God calls for the creation of ""were fruitful and reproduce"" (cf. Gen 1, 22 and 28) there is determination ""according to their types.""  If mîn refers to the reproductive limitations, why is it not used for propagation, but just to cause?  For this reason, many kreacjonistów believes that the relationship mîn not the multiplication or division, but the chapter suggests that we can share plants, the creation of flying, floating and ground into separate mîn. 
 Ironically, the word baramin created by the use of English syntax, in Hebrew means created by nature, therefore implies evolution. The correct form should have read mîn baru."