" 

 ::::I notice you didn't try to provide a version of the above paragraph that conveys the same message, with equal clarity, without the letter 'e'. I think that basically settles the issue, until someone does provide a working example. 
 ::::Anyway, I don't see any point to just doing a section or two; it would be too easy (the 'Character' section already has barely any 'e's), wouldn't improve the article's encyclopedic quality, and wouldn't impress even the very small minority of readers who happened to notice it, while it would still hamper the quality of prose we use, as we're forced to eschew 'the' and the like. I don't see why you're opposed to my suggestion of creating a lipogram version of our Gadsby article in talk-space or user-space. It would still be something other editors could check out, if we put a link at the top of this talk page; and if you (and anyone else who wishes to contribute) did a truly amazing job on that lipogram, maybe someday, months or years down the line, you might be able to use that page's quality as leverage for enacting some sort of compromise? You can say, ""See? It can work, just read this page I made and it'll be proven."" (And yes, I know it's been done before, but that's unconvincing because the older version of the article also was missing a lot of the current version's content and clarity.) -  "