"== Congratulations. == 
 Congratulations on another great article, Jayjg.  Read and enjoyed.  No comments this time!!  ☺   
 :Thanks! I'm still working on it, adding detail and various interesting tidbits. I'm hoping to have it stable by tomorrow.   
 ==Improving citations; Bar to promotion to GA until addressed== 
 Inasmuch as sentences will be inserted within paragraphs, in between existing sentences, that will not be covered by end-of-para footnotes, the existing fact tags should not be removed until cites are supplied. 

 Furthermore, where quotes are supplied, there should always be a citation at the end of the sentence.   
 :As has been explained multiple times, citations are only required at the end of the set of sentences being cited, or at the end of the paragraph, if a paragraph end is reached. This is the standard used in all Featured Articles, and any Featured Article Candidate that used duplicate citations for every single sentence would either be fixed to remove them, or rejected. If you split a paragraph in some way, either by inserting new information, or creating a second paragraph, then it's your responsibility to create the necessary duplicate citations, by copying them from the end of the sentences or paragraphy. If you need further clarification on this matter, please ask at Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates.   
 ::First of all, I would appreciate it if you were to not threaten me uncivilly, as you did in your edit summary just now.  In addition to being uncivil, your doing so also violates your wp:admin obligations.  Your vitriol also suggests a failure to heed wp's guidance as to ""ownership"" of articles.  I've corrected a host of MOS errors, ce issues, and grammar, and provided new material supported by refs  a tone of collaboration, rather than muscle-flexing about ""my article"", may perhaps be in order. 

 ::Second, as has been explained to you multiple times, the problem is that other editors will (as I have already done today) insert sentences in the middle of paragraphs.  This is, of course, normal.  When you fail to put a ref at the end of sentence 1, in a 2-sentence para, and someone then inserts an un-ref'd sentence in between ""your"" two sentences, there is no way for a reader or editor to know  just looking at the refs, whether the end-of-para ref supports sentence 1, new sentence 2, or neither.  Surely, if this is not intuitive, you recall it being explained to you in the past. 

 ::As has further been explained to you, over time paras as they become larger are split, as has already happened in this article.  But referencing the sentences properly, you avoid the confusion that would otherwise attend the splitting of a para, that would lead to the first half (and new para) being bereft of refs.  Surely, this is intuitive. 

 ::In addition, as has been explained to you, sentences that contain quotes should definitely be ref'd.   

 ::Furthermore, where refs are absent, and requested, you should not remove the cite requested tag without providing a ref.  Which is what you have done.   

 ::Your hostility in your edit summary is unbecoming an admin, a violation of wp:civil, and a violation of wp:admin (and please consider this a warning for both).  Kindly work at improving the article so that readers can know what material is referenced, and what is not, rather than engage in edit warring and incivility.   
 :::As has been explained already, the standard is to put citations at the end of multiple sentences or paragraphs - FA articles must do this. The goal here is to get the article to FA quality, not disqualify it by inappropriately citing every sentence and thereby dooming the candidacy. If you split a paragraph, then duplicate the citation. If you need further clarification on this matter, please ask at Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates.   
 ::::Every step I've taken is to improve the article.  I've added pertinent text, added refs, added the spelling of the name that was not reflected, corrected a number of MOS violations, wp:overlink violations, gra