" 

 ==Deletion== 

 Hi BigHairRef, 

 So you delete pages posted by smaller companies who are putting up information about their organization, ones that are written without trying to sell any product - but you leave big companies on wikipedia alone. I guess you can't fight the big companies and you prefer to bully small companies who don't have the guns to keep their information on the site. There have been stories in the main stream press about how corporations are using wikipedia for blatant marketing - and i just looked at a few of them and its amazing what they get away with compared to what I wrote about my company. 

 So, do you like to help the rich get richer rather than allow any company to put up information about their history, background, inventions, etc. I agree, using Wikipedia for marketing or to simply try to get traffic is wrong, but if big companies or well financed small companies can put their info up, then any company should be able to put up their history and information without being labeled ""blatant marketing"". Who are you to say which company is or is not relevant to have their information on wikipedia? What are the criteria for one company to be here and another company to not be here - the rules are there, but they are not clear. 

 If a small company crosses the line, you should give them a chance to make edits and put their information up. I attempted to make edits, got no feedback, and tried to do everything i could to comply. And yet, my name is up as clear as day in this site as if I am a scoundrel just looking to abuse this great site. Nothing could be farther from the truth. I respect wikipedia, i use it regularly, and I don't like blatant marketing on this site as much as you do. 

 I don't want you flaming me again, so that's why you won't see my name - but this is really wrong. Also, I'm sure you will delete this immediately as you won't have this type of criticism on your page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by    "