" 
 :::(e/c)  And I believe we should not be ""conforming to this bulleted approach"".  Who agreed it, where, and why?  And, why should it be applied in this article?  Just repeating a statement that it's ""consistent with other articles"" is of no value, when clearly many other articles do not take that approach, and no-one has yet explained why it is clearer to readers than unbulleted, unemboldened prose.    "