, 19 September 2012 (UTC) 
 ::::It's probably true that you can find good citations for connecting the theorems to the Liar paradox, and you can find other good citations for the view that the Liar is meaningless (that's probably the dominant view, I'd guess).  You can't put them together to claim that the Goedel theorems might be wrong!  That's original research by synthesis, and this is an excellent example of why this is disallowed, because that's a totally invalid inference.   04:22