" 

 == Location and section header relative to emails controversy == 

 There's been a flurry of changes on this.  At issue is: 
 # Should the emails controversy be located in the Secretary of State section or in the section that deals with after Secretary of State and before 2016 presidential campaign? 
 # Should the emails controversy be its own section? 
 # Should the emails controversy be part of the title of an enclosing section? 
 # What should the title of that section be? 

 On the first, I feel strongly that it should not be in the Secretary of State section.  The discovery of the issue, the turning over of some of the emails and deleting of other emails, the publishing schedule and demands by the Gowdy committee, all these things are happening in 2015, two years after she left State. 

 I also don't think it should be its own section, not until we know whether it will achieve major impact upon her life or career.   Consider the WP:10 year test – lots of controversies in Clinton's past occupied the headlines at the time, but they don't warrant a separate section now.  Indeed the only one that shows up in a header in this article is Whitewater, because for that she was the subject of a long Independent Counsel investigation, which issued formal findings as to her actions, and during which she was subpoenaed to testify before a Federal grand jury.  Nothing equivalent to that has happened here.  Maybe it will, but it hasn't yet.  I get that recentism is a powerful force, but it's our job to resist it as best we can. 

 As to what the title of the post-Sec State, pre-2016 campaign section should be, there's no great answer for these years when a politician is out of office before staging another presidential run.  I've had ""Subsequent activities"" which is kind of lame.  Inclusion of the Clinton Foundation belongs, since she joined it as a named member, was part of a couple of initiatives, then stepped down from it during this period.  But what else isn't exactly clear.  In a snap reaction last night I made it ""Clinton Foundation, emails controversy, and other activities"", but as I'm saying here, I think I was wrong to include emails in the header.  Better would just be ""Clinton Foundation and other activities"".    "