" 

 ==wllm.com I cannot post?== 

 Hello, 

 I've tried 3 times (twice with Wordpress and once with no login) to reply to the wllm.com blog, but none of the replies have shown up.  Am I doing something wrong? - The non-appearing posts were calm, non-insulting, perhaps even boring, but I didn't save them before posting and I don't want to type them again and have them not show up. 

 We have not conversed before anywhere - I did sign up on Wikipediocracy a while ago to post a picture of Gordon Ramsey choking Greg Kohs, but by the time I finished signing up, the discussion had moved on and I never did post the photo there or post at all.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by   •    

 Thanks, 
 Entlebucherdoodle. 
 : I'll check it out. Sometimes they go to a spam folder for various reasons.   

 ::Thanks - I can't remember the exact text, but I think there was a  < B > and a < /B > in there somewhere.     

 :::Thanks I was able to post on wllm.com - I think that when I remember/find my Wikipediocracy login information, that I will finally post the photo of Gordon Ramsey choking Greg Kohs on Wikipediocracy, I don't know where else to post it.  It is tasteful and not violent - Greg is smiling.    
 :::: It sounds like a pretty funny pic. I started a thread a while back while I was getting data points on whether Greg posing a threat at WikiConference 2014 was credible. Coincidentally, it was where I found out about the infamous boldfacing. He had apologized for it by that time. Then he unfortunately voided that apology as far as I'm concerned with his referring back to it an unapologetic way, although I did not- and still don't- believe he poses any physical threat whatsoever. In any case, I called it ""The Roast of Greg Kohs,"" and it was pretty tame but for that one instance. He posted a picture of him posing next to a roast chicken. I suggest posting it on that thread.   
 :::::The roast chicken thread was where I was going to post the Gordon Ramsey Choking Greg Kohs photo (an actual non-photoshopped image) but by the time I had my Wikipediocracy account set up, the thread had moved on.  Did you ask Greg Kohs for his side of the ""he got"" text before you made the ""Greg Kohs and Bigotry"" blog post?  I frequently see text on legitimate journalism sites and newspapers such as ""xxxx did not reply to requests for comments before this issue went to print.""  I understand that blogs don't have to have the same ethics as mainstream journalists, so that may be the reason.  It would be a lot of work if all the blogs on the internet were required try to get both sides of any post they made and they would be less popular.  I tried to read Donald Rumsfeld's autobiography some time ago and it was somewhat boring to read because on all of the major issues he would explain both sides of each argument to be made for actions that he took.  It would have been a much more ""enjoyable"" read if he discussed only the reasons ""for"" his actions and had left out the ""against"" arguments.  So, I can understand why on your own blog you would present your own views on issues without trying to contact the subject of a defamatory blog post to get their side prior to publishing the post - if anyone wants to present their own side, they can set up their own blog"". All the best, and keep trying to do what's right especially after you fall short.   "