" instead) === 
 #…  
 #  
 #  
 #  
 #  
 #   

 ===Only the one site (solosuck.com)=== 
 The listing currently reads: 
 *solosuck.com A commercial website devoted to autofellatio 
 # It seems to have the most free stuff, and is thus the most useful.    
 #  It seems kind of silly to have to vote on every edit to the page. 
 #:Agreed - it seemed like the only thing to stop the revert war.    
 #This is a good site for the subject. |  
 # I'll support this if solosuck and the single image link is voted down.   
 #Seems fine. —  |   
 #··:2005-02-16 01:22 Z 
 #   
 #  is right, this is silly. ·  
 #   

 ===Other=== 
 solosuck plus others, or others without solosuck 

 * solosuck  as well as the image link  - it has a domain that his irked some but is otherwise relevant and spam/spyware/popup free (unlike what one may find from the google list). 
 # Support.   
 # I'd also go for this.    
 # I'm not crazy about Solosuck, but there really should be some external links to images.   
 #   
 # The image link is just as, if not more, useful than solosuck.  —    

 ===Comment=== 
 OneGuy has unilaterally deleted the link to onesuck as ""spam"".  I have reverted it pending the result of these numerous votes.    

 : The link was not deleted just by me. It was deleted by several other users. You inserted back a link to porn spam site selling products without any discussion on the talk page   

 ::Um, aren't we discussing it on the Talk page?  And isn't there a vote going on right now as to what to do with the link?    

 ::: We are discussing it, yes, but I haven't seen you discuss it. When you revert to the previous version at least post some justification as to why you think that version is better. This poll was setup just few minutes before you reverted the page. Tony Sidaway and SPU (basically two people) want to insert a link to this site porn site: solosuck.com. If you go to the site, it's basically a site setup to sell video tapes for 50 dollars. Like all other porn sites, it has some sample pictures and video clips, but basically the site is a commercial porn site selling video tapes. Search the web and you will find thousands of other porn sites on this topic selling something.  Why should we randomly choose one commercial porn site and give them free advertisement on Wikipedia? Since you reverted the page to the version with spam link, I would like to see your justification   

 :: If you find one with better stills and video clips, or better yet, one with stills and video clips and other useful content, we can discuss whether to list than one.  Meanwhile I think solosuck is very good. |  

 :::It's your opinion that this spam site selling video tapes is good. I think it's a pathetic site. Who cares what I or you think?  Every spammer thinks his site is excellent. You are linking to a site that is basic