"Please have a looksy here.  

 == Changeling == 

 Sure, every article needs work, since the perfect article does not exist. But you need to explain on the articles talk page why it needs special attention. Right now you give us zero clue what you find wrong. Continue this discussion on talk:Changeling.   

 == Sources which prove that actor Nick Adams was gay == 
 There is an edit war going on concerning the homosexuality of actor Nick Adams. Could I possibly ask you to have a look at the Talk:Nick Adams page? As a recent reply to administrator 's comment on this page,  has written, ""You clearly haven't read that link yourself. Why didn't you bother to check it? Maybe because you're so busy as a new Wikipedia:Admin?"" This sounds very similar to flamings by  who, some weeks ago, frequently deleted all references relating to Adams's homosexuality. See also his reply to administrator  on  ""Yet again I have to request that you read facts and know what you are talking about before commenting. I suggest, since this matter is in the hands of Wikipedia:Mediator Ed Poor, that it might be best for you to refrain from further comments and not interfere in the process."" See, in addition, this user's attempts at silencing me by repeatedly accusing me of vandalism and deleting my contributions to the Talk:Nick Adams page and some related pages. Why are users Wyss and Ted Wilkes so keenly interested to suppress every reference that Nick Adams was gay? See also Natalie Wood and Talk:Natalie Wood where information concerning Wood's contacts to Hollywood gays taken from a current biography has been repeatedly deleted by user Wyss. On the Talk:Nick Adams page, this user now claims that he ""found zero documented evidence to even thinly support any assertion under WP standards that Mr Adams was a homosexual"" and that none of my edits ""are supported by documented evidence cited in peer-reviewed, secondary sources"". In my opinion, this seems to be a new strategy by user Ted Wilkes (using an alias) to suppress any reference that Adams was gay. I am quite sure that users Ted Wilkes and Wyss must be identical, as  is all too familiar with David Bret's writings (see also Talk:David Bret) and uses similar arguments as Ted Wilkes presents to suppress my contributions to the articles on Nick Adams and Natalie Wood. Significantly, the following sentence can be found on 's page: ""I think the Internet trolls inhabiting Wikipedia are its biggest weakness since they stir up unhelpful vandalism throughout helpful anarchy."" In addition, the ""barnstar of diligence"" is appearing on both of their pages. See  and . What do you think? Perhaps you can place some comment on the Talk:Nick Adams and Talk:Natalie Wood pages, etc. Thanks in anticipation.  2 July 2005 16:58 (UTC)"