"\ 
 ::I don't believe you, as I just looked back over that edit and others like it, where Ravich was taken out before; there were clear syntactical changes in the surrounding sentence showing you were paying attention to what you were doing.  I think you only put it back in and claimed ""accident"" because you got caught: I'm not prepared - not with YOU, at any rate, to ""Accept Good Faith"", because I don't think you have any yourself.  To sum up, Hong: this latest round of nonsense from you prompts me to render a personal judgement on you: you're dishonest and also a hypocrite about what you think others should abide by when you feel no compunction to observe the very same themselves.  Being unable to be self-critical is one thing, but I don't think it's just vanity on your part; I think you're inherently dishonest.  That's not an attack, it's an observation, backed up by your various dodges and inconsitences here and elsewhere.  Open thing that leads me to adjudge you that is that because, in my culture, it is widely recognized that those that feel the need to lecture and hector others are generally those who should be listening to their own sermons.  But I don't think it's self-deception with you; I think you're deliberately dishonest. "