"==Lack of verifiability== 
 In view of the article multiple issues, I have asked here that only verifiable material should be added back, avoiding spam and weasel terms. Nevertheless, the previously challenged version of the article has been restored, with the following comment: ""Editor Verification of sources required prior to effective erase of verifiable material"". This is not how WP works. The following rules of verifiability are reminded: 
 * The ""policy requires that ... any material challenged or likely to be challenged be attributed to a reliable published source using an inline citation"". 
 * ""The burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material. Any material lacking a reliable source directly supporting it may be removed."" 
 Following these rules is key to our collaborative work. Thank you,     "