" 

 :*Greyhood, once before on an AFD page I remember mistaking someone for someone else (cos the former didn't sign his comments), but the incident I'm referring to above is this - where you took a figure of ""25,000"" when the source itself favoured ""5-7,000"" as the amount present at a protest. See? You cherry-pick. And the result? A band of other editors feel obliged to go through all your edits checking to see if you've misrepresented yet another source. There seem to be 4 or 5 editors on this page who have a problem with you. Why do you think that is? I may not agree with Russavia, for instance, but s/he doesn't write rubbish like you, hence - we have no problems on this scale. As for you saying: ""...your job here is to fix and improve the article, not issuing morals and accusations"" - actually, I'd prefer not to fix your edits, when there's no need. You are doing this on purpose - picking only ""facts"" that suit you, even if the source doesn't substantiate them. That is being disruptive - writing false info and expecting others to correct it (or probably, hoping they won't notice). 
 :*One last question: do you get paid to edit WP, or is this just fun for you? Not an accusation you understand, just a question.  "