"::So, saying that an editor is ""crapping on legitimate sources"" is what passes for civility and thoughtfulness now? Interesting. In any case, the proposals have been discussed, refined, rediscussed, and re-refined. Instead of debating them again and again, I would respectfully ask that those editors who have already expressed their opinion in favour of one or the other options now refrain from arguing with those who disagree. Quizimodo, you have made your opposition to option A plain. Is it really necessary to restate it to every editor who expresses a preference for it? -   

 "