::So, basically, what we have here is: 
 ::*Two or more editors (Bubba73 and Quale) who have had a consensus on the article since 12 Dec 2010 
 ::*An IP address editor (98.113.152.93) who keeps introducing material against consensus 
 ::*Another editor (212.68.15.66) who came by, saw the brouhaha, and made another revert 
 ::*A fourth editor (Jsharpminor) who came by, saw the brouhaha, and templated three people for excessive reversion and 3RR, 
 ::*An article that now stands correct by consensus. 
 ::It seems that the obvious thing, then, is to leave the article the way it is. However, do take note that engaging someone in an edit war, even if consensus supports you, isn't the right way to handle it. (For clarity, the page was reverted six times between 5:32 11 Apr and 8:41 12 Apr.) You might want to see the pages on reverting and edit warring for suggestions, including a request for protection, and the edit war noticeboard. I'm posting a report of this to the noticeboard; I'm not sure what they'll decide to do with him. 
 ::Cheers!!