"Do NOT Undo Edits Because of You Feel They Don't Add Anything == 

 Please do NOT undo edits because you feel they don't add anything. State a tangible reason. Opening description was edited to reword 'black' to African-American or African. The term 'nigga' is a subjective pop culture term that does NOT belong in the opening paragraph. It is something not widely used. Just because you, your friends, or two black folks you know use the term doesn't mean it deserves wikipedia.org callout. Furthermore, it is important to note that the term has dual meaning instead of referring to 'nigga', why not refer to nizzle? All those items OR OTHER STUFF as you like to call it belong in the body of the article. The opening should just summarize and allude to further details to come as this new wording does. -Spencer,Leon  
 : Errr. You do realise that your versions still has a link to nigga in the opening paragraph. Its also a well sourced and stable article. You might like to provide some reliable sources for ""The strife between pop culture and politically correct culture has led to attempts to avoid words with similar pronunciation - e.g. Niger, niggardly, and negro. Some use derivations such as nig, nigga, niggaz, and nizzle to reflect kinship while avoiding a direct pronunciation of nigger."" because it reads very much like your opinion, rather than an accurate reflection of the literature. e  

 Very off hand comment I have to say an article on ""Nigger"" deserves a reference to ""Nigga"" early in the article as the two terms are very linked and both (sadly) very popular. Yes I understand there is a huge difference between the two spellings.    

 == "