My bottom line is this discussion is that I do not think that this article needs to be tagged or broken up. Neither of the two sets of tags that were put on this article were discussed before they were placed.  And neither were place appropriately.  It is an FA and very little has changed since the FA review.  The section that the other editor began to remove from this article are not long enough (an probably never will be) to warrant stand alone article. This article does not require drastic changes.