::I see your concerns, and many people have expressed them before. It is, of course, important to note that Wikipedia is an Encyclopedia, meaning a compendium of general knowledge, whether it is objectionable or not. The content disclaimer explains it well. So having an article on these slurs (and believe me there's more article where that comes from) can be a legitimate topic if treated well. I don't think there is any violation of NPOV, since they are merely representing the (admittedly subjective) material in an objective way. I do have a little concern about those lists only in that lists of words tend to violate (in my view) the policy that Wikipedia is not a dictionary, but it would take a major reversal of our ways to do anything about that. Wikipedia does not shy away from possibly objectionable material, instead it tries to treeat it in an NPOV way (for which I am proud). See, for example, some pretty good articles at fuck, nigger, and motherfucker. ·