" 
 ::A bit little unseemly for a US state's atty general's office cataloging membership of some religious minority living in some other country! But I suppose in this case the circumstances very well justify such a scenario. In any case, literally a ton of sources reference the Church of the Firstborn of the Fulness of Times' existence in Colonia LeBaron each and every decade since the village's founding in the 1920s. Furthermore those ""Ervilites""-perpetrated assassinations which the Utah state atty. general's office references were indeed SOLELY  carried out...NOT BY members this article's subject denomination, the Church of the Firstborn of the Fulness of Times, but, rather...UPON them. So, Wikipedia would be better off following in-depth reportage and scholarship rather than some list-style, offhand report produced by civil servants (not so much offense intended)namely, for example, the 2004 book by scholar Janet Bennion, who lived among the LeBaronites in the course of her gathering information on the Church of the Firstborn of the Fulness of Times (which is still almost entirely the predominant LeBaron sect), Bennion was led to believe by Colonia LeBaron residents who are fundamentalist Mormons that they continued to self-identify as belonging to the Church of the Firstborn of the Fullness of Times and the six references to the full name of the sect in her book were not accompanied by any qualifications. (E.g., see book's initial Col. LeBaron chapter where it says,""The socialpolitical structure of Lebaron is based on the rules and structures extablished in the Church of the Firstborn of the Fulness of Times...."" From the newspaper and magazine articles about this community I have read, it IS a very liberal one, comparatively speaking. However, even if the Chihuahua LeBaronites have experienced some diffusion of authority, resulting in a kind of independent-style Mormon fundamentalism somewhat typical of, say, the Centennial Park community (a situation which I merely speculate about since no sources would indicate this to be the case), the controlling fact here on Wikipedia is not Truth but verifiability, thus we are stuck with Bennion et al's statements that the community DOES indeed self-identify as holding to the beliefs and culture of the Church of the Firstborn of the Fulness of Times.  "