" 

 == ""No national consciousness"" == 

 No Croat national consciousness among Bunjevci in 19th century? Do I have to explain the term Botmagyarok? Besides that one, there were other hungarization pressures. School in Croatian abolished etc.. The name of Croats was too provocative for Hungarian authorities (memories from 1848, Hungarian national movement, Cossuth's ideas) outside of Croatia (I'm speaking about the Hungarian-ruled part of Austria-Hungary); Bunjevci leaders concluded that it'd be resulting at even bigger pressure to use their Croat name, so they decided to ""hide"" behind more ""neutral"", more ""innocent"" name of Bunjevci (for some reason, local Bunjevci joined Hungarian cause, against the Serbs, although some Bunjevci leaders were against that). At the end, even the name Bunjevci was too provocating for Hungarian authorities, so the various institutions dropped the ""Bunjevci, bunjevački"" from their names, in order to function properly. 
 Then came Kingdom of Yugoslavia, and then the king imposed the policy of ""one nation, three tribes""... Serb hegemonists didn't want to have 100 thousand Croats at the north of the country (there was a army intelligence report to king about that). 
 Then came WWII and Axis and proaxis coutntries with their minority ""tolerance"". 
 Socialist Tito's Yugoslavia began with good policy towards Croats from the north of Bačka (Bunjevci and Šokci). Later things changed (Croatian national theatre in Subotica abolished, various institutions of Croats in Vojvodina lost adjective ""Croat"" in their names...). However, Yugoslavia wasn't fabricating fake nations to decrease the number of Croats, but saw the reality that Bunjevci and Šokci are Croats, and showed them in statistics.  
 Ivan Sarić was among those Croats.  "