" 
 * Not a neutral question about the issue. Guy did not discuss this wording or follow the WP:RFC suggestion to ""Include a brief, neutral statement of or question about the issue"". The alternative is not to base just on ""self-identification"", the alternative is to follow the prevalence of the reliable sources on the matter (which generally say skeptic). I should warn anyone wishing to engage here that Guy has referred to those who don't call it denialist as ""idiots"" here, so bring a thick skin if you're joining this.   "