" 

 == BA Industrial Action == 

 As I said in the Talk page I had removed the section for now - meaning I sat it to the side to open a debate on it.  Perhaps I should have have opened the debate on it first rather than remove it, as I still believe it rather irrelevant for the article.  And at that it was poorly written with only a small amount of trivial detail rather than a full explanation of what the situation was (sympathy walk out rather than BA dispute).  That's neither here nor there, however, as it could and was easliy brought back and I'm happy if that's what everyone else thinks.  But must you be so aggressive in your tone??  I was simply setting out my point of view, using language where I could to state what I thought rather than being dictatorial.  However, your spiel is entirely dictatorial and stomps over any personal point of view with ""this is right and that's final"", with a good dose of firm language.  I don't care for being talked to like a school pupil, so please don't do so in future.  "