" 

 {|style=""border-top:solid thin lightgrey;background:transparent;padding:4px;"" 
 | Response to third opinion request: 
 |- 
 |style=""padding-left:0.6cm""|I don't see any grounds for complaints about BLP here, since the information is something that the subject herself claims to be true. The only exception would be if Satine Phoenix has said somewhere that it's not true - the mere claim that a porn actress is in a relationship with another woman does not seem to me to be inherently libellous. 

 The question, therefore, is as to whether the subject is a RS about herself, given that the website is essentially a self-published source. The criterion that applies here is whether ""the material is... unduly self-serving"". Given the context, it's entirely possible that this is promotional, but I don't think it's unduly self-serving, in a way that a statement such as ""...is one of the greatest porn actresses in recent history"" might be, or even (say) what her claimed favourite sexual positions are. I would recommend making the source of the information more explicit, by saying something such as ""according to her official website..."" That way the claim is entirely factual (her website does indeed say that) and readers can then judge for themselves whether or not they find it plausible.—   
 |}"