" 

 == Not Entirely Sure == 

 Dahn, 

 1. ""Do point out your reasons on the talk page (and tell me how you think the section you removed should be reformulated, if it should be present at all)""  
 :* I'm not sure I like keeping the section I removed at all.  This does not mean that facts, or information you included in it can't be presented elsewhere.  The problem with the section was that in effect the criticism it produces is of your own formulation (however good that formulation may be).  It is what would be considered original research from a Humanities perspective.  It isn't ""bad"" in anyway, nor is it necessarily wrong, but I can't endorse that kind of presentation in an encyclopedia entryand Wikipedia explicitly does not endorse it. 

 2. ""do address the issue of what the IP keeps doing when moving stuff relevant to Eliade's pre-Guardist nationalism to the section about 'controversy'"" 
 :* I think this is a tricky issue.  I'm not sure what you want me to ""address"" here.  Please elaborate. 

 3. ""and do express a view on the mention of Ornea being Jewish as equivalent to the mention of Sebastian being one. Please."" 
 :* Please elaborate on this.  I'm not exactly sure what this is about.  In general someone's ethnic/religious identity isn't an issue nor should it be.  If it relates to the circumstances (for instnace someone was persecuted because he/she was X) then it should be presented, but it shouldn't be used to discredit or to verfiy someone's statements.  I'll gladly speak up on that issue if the IP is trying to claim that Ornea and/or Sebastian's ethnic/religious identities are problematicwhat they say may be judged but what they are should NOT. "