== Romanization of Serbian == 

 Hey, I noteced your edits at that article, and I just wanted to tell you that you did a great job and to thank you for expanding it.   made an effort to improve it, but you fixed it perfectly just after.  The only part which is missing is the period between 1918-WWII.  I beleave that must be the crutial period, as it was then that the languages were merged with the creation of the Serbo-Croato-Slovenian, and it must be during that period that the new language became bi-alphabetical.  Thus it was then that Serbs start having the option of writting its language, now called S-C-S, in both alphabets.  Makes sense, right?  I can´t find any source for this, but all events make me come to this conclusion. 

 Anyway, all of this comes from a series of discussions about the use of diacritics in WP.  I came late to the last one, and by now I am not sure there is any active discussion regarding it anymore.  But new discussions will certainly appear, as no consensus was reached, and there are some users which strongly oppose the use of diacritics in article titles.  In ictu oculi was in favour of diacritics, me too, although I would not mind that much if they end up eliminated.  I mean, I am not fanatic over this, I just prefer them so correct native titles would be used, but I am OK if they end up being dropped, I would just prefer that a consensus is reached once and for all.