"== Category:Detroit == 

 There already is a fairly well-populated Category:Detroit, Michigan. Is another category needed? Or were you planning on moving the one to the other?   
 :No I just found the orphan Category:Detroit, not linked from Category:Michigan. I don't think Category:Detroit, Michigan was linked from there either, though. I have no idea which is better. I see Category:Chicago and Category:New York City.   

 ::OK, I see. Either name is OK with me, although I'm not inclined to go changing the categories for a bunch of articles right now. Category:Detroit, Michigan is a subcategory of Category:Cities in Michigan which is itself a subcategory of Category:Michigan. I can see some reason for adding the Detroit category directly under Michigan, but then again hierarchy purists sometimes object to such recursion.   
 :::I am one of those link-mad anti-hierarchicists myself. I don't care which category stays as long as it is consistent with other similar categories. I mentioned the problem at Categorys for deletion.   

 == Reply == 

 I've replied at .   

 So much of the Chicago article was lost in the last week or so, it seems to have happened somewhere around 10/18. I don't believe it is due to vandalism but rather because the page hit the 32k limit. Numerous attempts at reverting failed. I'm not trying to piece the article back together from recent versions. In order to avoid the same problem I'm removing many lists and putting them into their own articles and doing things like keeping the extensive history section but moving the ""Important Dates"" section into it's own article called Chicago Timeline. It'll take awhile to get it back together. 
 #  

 == Friuli == 

 Thanks for correcting the text I added to Friuli, my english is not very good, I should probably study more ;). By the way, could you also have a look at Friulian language? Thank u very much   

 == Dot Project Maps == 

 Hi. I watch Seth Ilys' pages and I'm working on the Dot Project. I thought I would give you my opinion of your question to him, if you don't mind. 

 I typically don't look at individual locales before I create maps. It's been extremely rare up to now (maybe once or twice in 2000+ maps) that there already is one there, and those weren't standard Dot Project maps. I believe I left them alone and also added a standard Dot Project map. 

 As far as I know, no one has asked until now to do only some communities in a state, but I've expected it would occur eventually. The Dot Project is a big task and only a few of us have tackled it. I've done Missouri, Arizona, and Ohio, and am pretty far along on Louisiana. After that, I would like to do Kansas and then, I'll probably stop, at least for awhile. If you would like to do maps for Louisiana and/or Kansas, I guess I'd welcome the assistance. 

 It would be nice in such a collaboration to have a way to find what maps have been generated for a state (eg 'show me all instances of ""LAMap*.png""'), but I understand that we can't query for images this way in Wikipedia. If you're only doing a few in each state, the way I create my images isn't very time-consuming. Hitting one occasionally wouldn't be a bother. I usually generate them alphabetically by county/parish, getting all the cities, towns and unincorporated areas in a county/parish before moving on to the next. If you were going to focus on the larger cities, that would work too, as I could preview them easily enough. If it was 'scatter-shot', it would be nice if you could leave a list in some logical place. I could then scratch the completed ones from my to-do list. 

 Of course, I don't speak for Seth. Outside of Louisiana and Kansas, what happens with the Dot Project might not affect me. I'll be interested in seeing Seth's response to your question.   

 == September 11, 2001 attacks Revisions == 

 Hi! 
 Thanks for taking notice and reverting the changes I made to the 9/11 attacks page. I think that my edits were correct, though so I thought to send you this explanatory note. I tried to condense this page at the suggestion of the edit warning: ""WARNING: This page is 39 kilobytes long. Please consider condensing the page and moving the detail to another article so it is not approaching or in excess of 32KB."" 
 *The edits to the death to