"::: Still, TOO MANY QUOTES. For instance, take a look at the Richard Feynman article; despite the fact a lot of the things he has said are extremely interesting and resemble his character well, they don't need to be quoted verbatim, so long as what he was saying, and it's importance is quoted. For instance, instead of writing out his entire monologue in which he describes motion and it's relevance through a joke, can easily be surmised by ""also used humorous methods of relating material to the real-world [ref]"". When i was in university, i was told an important fact, even when quoting small texts; ""Don't just dump a quote into a text""  which seems to be going on here. 

 ::: If you see the article, for instance, there is  ""''Pat Barker, in the third novel in her Regeneration Trilogy, The Ghost Road suggests a reason for these problems but Rivers himself, although he may have had some idea of the causes, does not appear to cite them fully in his writings. However, in 'Instinct and the Unconscious' he also states that he had at least begun to realise the cause: "". Now, it can easily be said ""Suchandsuch noted that blahblahblah [ref], due to his tone [ref] blahblah [ref]"", rather than quoting exactly what he has said in a long drawn out fashion. Also, isnt there a chance of the quotes that are almost a page long being something that represents a POV, as well as non-wiki grammar? No offence intended.   

 "