" 

  
 : I agree that the material on the opposition to the convention is poorly sourced and written. The statement ""Opposition to ratification by some religious groups, some of whom claim it conflicts with the United States Constitution"" appears as a complete non sequitur to me, and unfortunately no more material is given in the article. The citation to the emory law review article is dead. Also unfortunate is that this poorly sourced claim shows up both in the general article on this UN convention as well as this expanded article.   "