"In all this, Knucmo2, you have failed to explain the break with Wagner and you seem to very quickly dismiss the issues with his sister: ""You generalise.  Nietzsche's falling out with his sister was not on purely philosophical grounds."" (the irony of the accusation of generalisation!)See Kaufmann for a good treatment of the topic. And if you debate his account, then look at the letters yourself and put forward a better interpretation. 

 Digging up quotes and calling them evidence shows that you don't understand how to read Nietzsche. He wrote hyperbolically and exagerated everything in an attempt to overcome his decedence. For example, The Genealogy of Morals is written in the form of a scholarly treatise but it uses completely outrageous language. It's an attempt to point out that even dispassionate argument stems from the writers own prejudices. It's a brililiant piece of irony. It makes his presence as an author unforgettable. (Alexander Nehamas goes into detail quite well on this) 

 All you have done is put forward another misunderstood objection that displays, as Nietzsche might call it, the hight of decedance. The Nazis did the same thing. Nietzsche was too clever to be a serious anti-semite. Kaufmann's book (Ch. 10) offers an excellent discussion of it which goes far beyond the presentation of a few aphorism and an assertion that the case is obviously closed. I can present just as many quotes, one's like atni-semitism being 'the lowest level of European culture, its morass'. It would be just as easy as what you have done here. But that to be missing the point. 

 Russel's chapter on him in the History is one of his worst pieces of work. It's a disgrace that such a renound philosopher can get the details wrong on what pre-Socratics Nietzsche liked (not to mention a pointless labouring on his opinions on women and a very twisted, uninformed interpretation and use of the will to power). 

 Find something better to do than critising Nietzsche. How about reading him? 

 "