" 
 Returning to the fundamental premise, I see that the Zionism and racism forwards a misleading argument that I believe needs to be examined closely.  I'd appreciate further debate on this point, as there are several issues at play.  Here are the issues that I feel need to be addressed. 
 # Zionism and racism uses a tailored definition of racism (that is at odds with the definition found on Wikipedia's article on racism) that omits ehnicity as a factor in racism.  The use of this modified definiton creates a logical inconsistency, by which anti-Semitic behavior can not be considered racism without applying blatant double standards.  To leave out ethnicity, Jews are not a race, and therefore can never claim racial bias against them.  
 # In the opening exposition of Zionism and racism, there are absolutely no claims made that Zionism is racist, only defense of Zionism from such claims.  The reader is presented exclusively with only one side of the issue.  A more appropriate title for this article would be ""Defense of Zionism from claims of racism"".  
 # A large number of the claims that are made in this article are not referenced, and as such, contain the same WP:OR that would apply to someone articulating a furtherance of an argument.  If pieces of an article are to be removed because they are not referenced, then should not the same rules apply to other pieces in the same article that are similarly not referenced? 
  "