" 

 :You can't add pronouncements in Wikipedia's voice like the claim that the rule has been ignored or misrepresented etc etc. We don't get to day that ""the core of Rabbinic Judaism which has been forfeited, by many sects of Judaism, in favor of 'theological' positions outside Judaism."" You can express the view of a notable commentator who has said that. Some of your additions simply misunderstand the topic. The sentence ""Rabbinic Judaism does not possess a singular 'Golden Rule' in the way that others conceive or illustrate"" is irrelevant. The Golden Rule is just a name for this particular moral precept. It has nothing to do with the general notion that there is a single important ""rule"" to follow. No religion has a single golden rule, but many have a form of the Golden Rule. Hence much of the rest of what you write is simply irrelevant to the article, for example ""According to Maimonides, in “Mishneh Torah”, Sefer Hamada, Hilkhot Yesodei Hatorah 8:2, the ultimate grounds for belief in God are legal, not theological or metaphysical..."". That may well be true, but has nothing whatever to do with the topic of this article, which is the ethic of reciprocity commonly named ""the Golden Rule"". Having said that, I agree that the current version is lacking in many ways, but yours needs to be discussed.   "