" 
 *: This ""illustrating the article"" can't be a justification for uploading porn. There should be a clear policy. Should we allow people to upload child porn to ""illustrate"" (what a joke) what child porn is? And other graphic porn ""illustrating"" bestiality, anal sex,  urolagnia, rapes, necrophilia? That's just a nonsensical excuse for allowing people to upload porn. The policy on this should be clearly defined, and all porno pictures should be deleted. I don't see what's the point of this poll anyway. The site owner should define the rules on porn. He has already said this image is completely unacceptable for wikipedia  I don't even consider this borderline. That's should be the end of the debate.  Someone can always start their own Pornopedia if they disagree.  "