it is more than obvious to anyone who takes the time to review this that both sides who feel strongly on issues will equally both feel they are right. What wikipedia has done same as real climate website hosted by gavin is to assume they are the sole source of facts and everyone else who might disagree with them is wrong...haha...can you not copy these words here below and above and read in silence and see for yourself the idiocy of arguing points in this site ? wikipedia has the fruit stand, you say the fruit they are selling you is rotten, wiki says  no no its okay even as we see the bugs crawling around in the fruit...wake up people...do not waste your time on this site, wikipedia is not the fact-based site it claims to be and the only people who believe are the fools donating money to them just like they give money to real climate...what a joke... 
 BlondeIgnore