" 

 == Pandeism? == 

 Hello Brian0918...  Since you seem to have a particular interest in the God article, and you have eliminated additions to it in the past based on the fact that they seemed to be ""original research"", I thought I should bring to your attention something that I find odd about the God article and get a second perspective before I do anything about it.   

 I notice that an odd word has been introduced into the article:  ""pandeism"".   This is a neo-logism; it does NOT appear in the dictionary; if you Google it, there are only 81 (actually 38) results, mostly in GNU free style wiki encyclopedias; if you follow the wikipedia link to find out what pandeism is supposed to be you find an article that was originated and expanded by a user  who seems to have concocted this theological position on his own.   

 The Pandeism article seems to be articulate and has a scholarly sheen, but if you poke at it, there doesn't seem to be any real substance beyond the author's own thought.  There are no real connections to historical philosophers, theologians, religions, etc. that would lend any credence to this article.  There are no external links to other discussions of ""pandeism""...  And if you take time to track appearances of the word in other wikipedia articles, it all seems to have been done by the same people in the very recent past (i.e. since March 12, 2005.)  The superficial nature of the concept and the article makes me think that it is NOT an appropriate addition to the wikipedia. The link to pandeism ought to be removed from the God article in my opinion.   

 What do you think?  Have I missed something important in my analysis? 

 Thanks,   "