" 

 == RedPen, stop warring over ""movement"" == 

  You are arguing over something that is settled. While it can be said that many reliable sources do not talk about, or give credence to the movement, many others do or at the very least refer to the existence of a movement. You've tried to edit the lede twice to whitewash it out. Why? For your (inevitable) reply of PROVEIT: 

 The Guardian: ""Five months on, the movement has faded to a background hum."" The Guardian refers to a movement. 

 NYTimes: ""That disclosure galvanized a movement on Twitter among people who used the #gamergate hashtag to attack journalistic ethics in the video game press."" NYTimes calls it a movement. 

 When reporters characterize Gamergate as misogynistic, proponents say those views don’t represent the movement. Instead, many claim to be advocating greater ethics among the video game press."" The Columbia Journalism Review refers to it as a movement. 

 Since when is TheRedPenofDoom's opinion more important than The Guardian, The New York Times, or the Columbia Journalism Review?   "