" 
 :::So what phrase that I wrote exhibited ""venomous spite""?  That accusation demands justification.  how is ""Nearly 14 hours since the inappropriateness of the current phrasing was raised: what's the delay? If a meaningful description of the controversy can't be found, don't make up a phrase"" an attack on anyone, least of all on you?  The ""current phrasing"" referred to the phrasing of the ITN blurb: in context, I believe that to be obvious.   
 :::I really don't think you should be lecturing me on placement of comments in a thread.  The comment that you objected to, just like the comment that you made before that, was indented as the next contribution to a discussion, not a direct reply to the immediately preceding comment.  The only part of the initial phase of the conversation that is clearly marked as being from you is the two links; the preceding line is differently indented, and unsigned: I had no reason to assume that it was your comment. And your rather intemperate outburst was indented identically to a preceding comment from an unregistered editor, and positioned such that, if it was a reply to anyone, it was to Medeis. 
 :::And if you are going to post redundant empty sectrion headers on other users' talk pages, at least find out what the phrases that you use mean first, so that you at least attempt to insult accurately.    "