" 

 ::::Jakew, the photo shows a protest against routine infant circumcision. It appears in a subsection which includes the following: 
 ::::Opponents of circumcision question the ethical validity of removing healthy, functioning genital tissue from a minor, arguing that infant circumcision infringes upon individual autonomy and represents a human rights violation. 
 ::::The image depicts an ""opponent[s] of circumcision"", the placards reference the ""ethical validity of removing healthy, functioning tissue from a minor"" through the words and phrases ""Foreskin is not a birth defect"", ""Whose body?"", ""Whose rights?"", and through the use of the images of infants. Furthermore, the phrase ""Whose rights?"" references ""human rights violation"", and the phrase ""Whose body?"" references ""individual autonomy"". The image is very relevant to the part of the section in which it appears, bearing in mind that there is no requirement to find images which are pictorial representations of all aspects of the article or section to which they relate. The picture is illustrative and appropriate in the context in which it appears because it adds more information to this supposedly encyclopaedic article by showing the reader that some people are prepared to demonstrate against circumcision. You may not like it, but this is an aspect of circumcision opposition. It's unfortunate that we don't have a similar picture of a pro-circumcision rally (if such a thing existed) or similar, but that's no excuse for censorship. I suggest that neutrality isn't about finding a matching pro for every con (or vice-versa), and then exluding any unmatched pros and cons left over; it's about not suppressing any of the pros and cons which we take a dislike to. Instead of blocking attempts to add additional relevant information to the article, perhaps you could search for an image of activities related to one of those WHO inspired anti-HIV infection circumcision programmes you've referred to in previous discussions, and include that in the article, for example.   "