"== Genuine strong AI == 

 ""Genuine"" strong AI is no different from strong AI. The piece, now removed, supporting ""genuine"" strong AI was a naked point of view statement by a proponent of strong AI put in under another heading to publicise their opinion. This is an encyclopedia, not a forum for particular viewpoints. Please read the section on the 'Philosophy of Strong AI' in this article before launching into diatribes that are just a statement of belief that the brain must be a digital computer. It will be found that the strong AI viewpoint is already covered in the context of philosophical discussion of this issue.   

 == Move section == 
 Shouldn't the section ""Philosophy of strong AI and consciousness"" be moved to Philosophy of artificial intelligence?   

 I wrote an article on strong AI Strong Artificial Intelligence, not realising this one existed. Looking at it, it seems that this one is about the philosophy whilst the one i started is concerned with the technology involved, and a detailed summary of existing futurist predictions. Ill change the title to reflect this if someone shows me how.   

 It says im too new to move an article. could someone please move it to Strong AI Technology. Cheers.   

 Done   

 What on earth is the notion of ""Utopian Marxism"" doing on this page? The notion does not have rigorous precedent; it reads as if someone had an idea, and decided to coin a phrase, applying two words (one would have been bad enough) with enough preloaded connotations and meanings to bury a legion of students under their weight. 3-14-06 

 == Artificial Intelligence != Strong AI == 
 This was recently added to the article: 
 :In the true semantic sense, the term ""Artificial Intelligence"" is really the same thing as what we now call ""strong AI"", and weak AI is just a recreation of one small, narrow ability which itself helps create true intelligence. 
 But this is controversial, to say the least. Artificial intelligence encompasses many things besides Strong AI, so it's wrong to say they're ""really the same"". It's very POV to say that the ""true meaning"" of Artificial Intelligence is this one specific thing - maybe you can say that's its original meaning, but if it really meant that then I think the page on AI would say so. Also, to address the second part of that added sentence, weak AI doesn't necessarily recreate an ability, nor does it necessarily help create true intelligence.   

 :I added that section, and I added ""In the true semantic sense"" before ""AI == Strong AI"" to distinguish what researchers and experts in the field think AI means as opposed what someone unfamiliar with the field is likely to take ""intelligence"" to mean. If you know zero about AI, you are unlikely to consider something like an 'expert system', or 'Bayesian networks' to be actual intelligence, even if you understand what they are. The paragraph is merely meant to fill in the uninformed that the Strong AI article is what they are looking for if they want to read about human-like intelligence and not the more obvious and intuitive plain AI article. It is not POV, just look up the dictionary definition of ""intelligence"" and compare it with the very first bit in this article describing strong AI: ""In the philosophy of artificial intelligence, strong AI is the claim that some forms of artificial intelligence can truly reason and solve problems"". Thus, in the semantic sense, artificial intelligence is what we now call Strong AI, however it is not what people knowledgable in the field think of plain AI as. Thus, I added the clarification paragraph.  

 ::Well it's worded confusingly, then. ""Semantic"" means ""meaning"", so it sounds like you're saying that AI == Strong AI. You're saying that by ""In the true semantic sense"" you meant ""To those unfamiliar with the field""?   

 :::I will think about how to re-word it, but I think it needs to be stated that what experts in the AI field regard AI as is not what a laymen would expect AI to mean, and more importantly is categorically NOT related to the word ""intelligence"" more than Strong AI is. In other words, going by the definition of ""intelligence"", strong AI should be the default meaning. Obviously this isn't the case, but it needs to be clarified.  

 ::Also, your ""clarification paragragh"