{'annex_type': 'Annex I', 'IkiSheet': 'targets', 'page_number': '6, 15', 'renewable_energy_target': nan, 'transport_target_type': nan, 'target_year': 2050, 'country_netzero target_exists': 'x', 'country_summary_transport_targets': 'Transport non-GHG targets', 'target_type': 'T_BYE', 'oecd': 'OECD', 'income_group': 'High-income', 'g7': 0, 'mena': 0, 'region': 'Europe', 'parameter': 'T_Economy_Unc', 'ice_phaseout': nan, 'country_long-term_target_exists': 'x', 'ghg_total': 35.98505669056, 'ghg_transport_target_type': nan, 'g20': 0, 'target_scope': nan, 'ghg_transport': 6.895307983}
If maximum possible removals from the LULUCF sector are taken into account, a maximum of 90% emission reductions compared to 1990 could be envisaged, which would still not be sufficient to meet the objective of achieving climate neutrality. By 2050 there would still be at least 14 MtCO2eq. without counting
If maximum possible removals from the LULUCF sector are taken into account, a maximum of 90% emission reductions compared to 1990 could be envisaged, which would still not be sufficient to meet the objective of achieving climate neutrality. By 2050 there would still be at least 14 MtCO2eq. without counting removals in LULUCF (Figure 2) and after counting removals, it would be at least 7 MtCO2eq.
A maximum of 90% emission reductions compared to 1990