{'IkiSheet': 'investment', 'page_number': 30, 'region': 'Africa', 'parameter': 'M_Project', 'income_group': 'Low-income', 'annex_type': 'Non-Annex I'}
On the other hand, if one takes Solar PVs has negative marginal abetment revenue per ton of CO2 eq whereas its CO2 eq emission reduction is very significant it can have other social benefits in addition to environmental and socio-economic co-benefits. ~ 30 Annex 2 Mitigation Assumptions Measure options for
On the other hand, if one takes Solar PVs has negative marginal abetment revenue per ton of CO2 eq whereas its CO2 eq emission reduction is very significant it can have other social benefits in addition to environmental and socio-economic co-benefits. ~ 30 Annex 2 Mitigation Assumptions Measure options for reduction Investment required MUSD Potential reduction per option Waste heat recovery at cement plant Dissemination of 60,000 Efficient wood stoves Efficient electric grids distribution Replacement of 1.5 million incandescent lamp by LED efficient lamp Reforestation with agroforestry 35000ha Solar/diesel mini-grid 40MW Solar PVs, large grid 60MW Reforestation with Silvopasture 86000ha Wind turbines, on-shore 100MW Geothermal power Construction 50MW Wind turbines, off-shore 50MW Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) along the coast and from the port to the border with Sudan 1000km The above proposed lists of projects are Major options for reduction of CO2eq emissions reduction.
Investment required for Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) along the coast and from the port to the border with Sudan 1000km: 2259 (MUSD)