article: Plants respond to pathogens through dynamic regulation of plasma membrane-bound signaling pathways. To date, how the plant plasma membrane is involved in responses to viruses is mostly unknown. Here, we show that plant cells sense the Potato virus X (PVX) COAT PROTEIN and TRIPLE GENE BLOCK 1 proteins and subsequently trigger the activation of a membrane-bound calcium-dependent kinase. We show that the Arabidopsis thaliana CALCIUM-DEPENDENT PROTEIN KINASE 3-interacts with group 1 REMORINs in vivo, phosphorylates the intrinsically disordered N-terminal domain of the Group 1 REMORIN REM1. 3, and restricts PVX cell-to-cell movement. REM1. 3' s phospho-status defines its plasma membrane nanodomain organization and is crucial for REM1. 3-dependent restriction of PVX cell-to-cell movement by regulation of callose deposition at plasmodesmata. This study unveils plasma membrane nanodomain-associated molecular events underlying the plant immune response to viruses.
  The cell plasma membrane (PM) constitutes a regulatory hub for information processing [1]. Current knowledge suggests that PM proteins and lipids dynamically associate with each other to create specialized sub-compartments or nanodomains [2], that regulate the cellular responses in space and time [3–5]. For instance, modeling of the localization behavior of a PM-bound receptor and its downstream interactor before and after ligand perception in animal cells suggests that PM-partitioning into nanodomains improves the reliability of cell signaling [6]. In plants a recent example of PM partitioning shows that despite sharing several signaling components, the immune and growth receptors FLS2 and BRI1 are divided into context-specific nanodomains to confer signaling specificity [7]. The REMORIN (REM) family is one of the best-characterized PM nanodomain-associated proteins in plants [7–12]. The association of REMs to the PM is mediated by a short sequence at the extremity of the C-terminus of the protein, called REM-CA (REMORIN C-terminal Anchor) [13,14]. The REM C-terminal domain contains a coiled-coil (residues 117–152, [15]) which is thought to regulate REM oligomerization [11,14,16] and may be involved in regulating REM spatial organization at the PM [15]. Members of the REM family have been associated with plant responses to biotic [9,17,18], abiotic stress [19,20] and developmental clues [12] and current view suggests they could regulate signaling events through nanodomain association [21]. However, the molecular mechanisms leading to REM-associated downstream events remain elusive. Several REM proteins have been identified as components of the plasmodesmata-plasma membrane subcompartment (PD-PM) [8,22,23]. PD are membranous nanopores, crossing the plant cell wall and enabling cytoplasmic, endoplasmic reticulum and PM continuity between adjacent cells. They regulate the intercellular transport of proteins and small molecules during development and defense [24,25]. The PD-PM is a particular subcompartment of the PM, which displays a unique molecular composition, notably enriched in sterols [26]. The movement of macromolecules through PD can be tightly controlled through modulation of the PD size-exclusion limit (SEL) via hypo- or hyper-accumulation of callose at the PD neck region [27–29]. Overexpression of GRAIN SETTING DEFECT 1 (GSD1) encoding a phylogenetic-group 6 REM protein from rice, restricts PD aperture and transport of photo-assimilates [23]. PDs are also the only route available for plant viruses to spread from cell-to-cell. Potato virus X (PVX) promotes its cell-to-cell movement via modification of PD permeability [30] through the action of TRIPLE GENE BLOCK PROTEIN 1 (TGBp1) [31]. Overexpression of StREM1. 3 (Solanum tuberosum REM from group 1b, homolog 3 [32], further referred as REM1. 3) hampers TGBp1’s ability to increase PD permeability [33]. How REM1. 3 obstructs TGBp1 action is still unknown. Here, we used REM1. 3 and PVX pathosystem in the solanaceae Nicotiana benthamiana, because PVX cannot infect Arabidopsis [34] and N. benthamiana is a widely used model for research on plant-virus interaction [35]. We previously showed that REM1. 3 lateral organization into nanodomains at the PM is directly linked with its ability to restrict PVX movement and regulate PD conductance [36]. REM1. 3 was the first REM family member discovered and initially described as a protein phosphorylated upon treatment with oligogalacturonides, which are plant cell wall components and elicitors of plant defense [37,38] The biological relevance of REM phosphorylation is not known of different REM phospho-statuses suggest that the activity of these proteins could be regulated by phosphorylation during plant-microbe interactions [16,17,39,40]. In the present paper, we show that phosphorylation of REM dictates its membrane dynamics and antiviral defense by the reduction of PD permeability. Our data point towards a model in which viral proteins such as the Coat Protein (CP), TGBp1 from PVX and 30K proteins from Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) elicit the activation of protein kinase (s), which in turn phosphorylate (s) REM1. 3 at its N-terminal domain. In turn, REM1. 3' s phospho-status regulates its spatial-temporal organization at the PM and association with PD. The latter is associated with PD closure by induction of callose deposition at PD pit fields and restriction of viral cell-to-cell movement. Last, we further provide evidence that the membrane bound Arabidopsis CALCIUM-DEPENDENT PROTEIN KINASE 3 (CPK3) interacts with the taxonomic group 1b REMs in vivo, phosphorylates REM1. 3 in vitro and restricts PVX propagation in a REM-dependent manner. Collectively, this study brings valuable information about the involvement of PM nanodomains dynamics during the establishment of membrane-bound signaling processes.
  Group 1 and group 6 REM have been described as proteins regulating PD size-exclusion limit [8,23,33]. REM1. 3 plays a role in restricting PVX passage through PD channels [8], [33] counteracting PVX movement proteins which promote PD opening [41]. To study the potential function of REM1. 3 at PD in response to PVX infection, we surveyed simultaneously PD callose content and REM1. 3 PD localization in healthy or PVX-infected N. benthamiana transiently expressing YFP-REM1. 3 [42] (S1 Fig). Our analysis showed a significant increase in callose deposition in PVX-infected cells compared to mock conditions (Fig 1A and 1B). This finding suggests the recognition of PVX-encoded elicitors and the mobilization of a plant defense response leading to an increase of callose accumulation at PD pit fields. Since protein activation is often linked to changes in subcellular localization [3,44], we next examined whether PVX infection triggers changes in REM1. 3 association with PD. Calculation of the PD index (ratio between fluorescence intensity of YFP-REM1. 3 at the aniline-labeled PD pit fields and fluorescence at the PM around the pit fields [28], S1 Fig). Fig 1A and 1B showed that despite its role on PD regulation, YFP-REM1. 3 is not enriched in the PD region of healthy N. benthamiana epidermal cells. We however reproducibly observed a slight increase of YFP-REM1. 3 PD index upon PVX infection suggesting that PVX perception modulates REM1. 3 localization and association with the PD pitfields (Fig 1A and 1B). To gain further insights into REM1. 3 dynamic localization at the PM upon PVX infection, we applied single-particle tracking Photoactivated Localization Microscopy in Variable Angle Epifluorescence Microscopy mode (spt-PALM VAEM) in living N. benthamiana epidermal cells [45] in absence or presence of PVX. We used the photoconvertible fluorescent protein EOS [46,47] fused to REM1. 3 to visualize, track, and characterize mobility behavior of single REM1. 3 molecules. In addition, nanoscale localizations of single molecules observed overtime were computed to obtain super-resolution images and analyze REM1. 3 organization at a molecular level. By this approach, we recently studied the protein organization and mobility parameters of single EOS-REM1. 3 molecules in non-infected conditions and found that EOS-REM1. 3 displays an immobile and confined PM localization pattern, as commonly observed for plant membrane-associated proteins (Fig 1C–1E) [48], [36]. Reminiscent of these data, previous studies using different techniques described REM-associated PM domains to be predominantly laterally static [36,48,49]. Analysis of PVX-infected cells demonstrated an increase of EOS-REM1. 3 diffusion coefficient (D) and mean square displacement (MSD), reflecting an increase of REM1. 3 mobility (Fig 1C–1E). We next apply mathematical computation (Voronoï tessellation method [36,50]) to compare the supra-molecular organization of EOS-REM1. 3 of live PALM data in mock- and PVX-infected conditions (Fig 1F and 1G). Computation of EOS-REM1. 3 single molecule organization features demonstrated a modulation of REM1. 3 nanodomain-organization upon PVX infection (Fig 1G). Following PVX infection, the EOS-REM1. 3-formed nanodomains are bigger in size, and there is a slight decrease of the proportion of molecules that localized into nanodomains as well as a decrease in the number of nanodomains formed. Overall, in both conditions, EOS-REM1. 3 nanodomains represented similar proportions of the total PM surface. Additionally, a decrease in the localization density (number of molecules observed per μm2 per s) showed that upon PVX infection, there was less REM1. 3 protein at the PM level. Overall, the changes of REM1. 3 distribution under PVX infection i. e. enrichment of YFP-REM1. 3 in the PD pit field regions, the increase of REM1. 3' s mobility and the modulation of REM1. 3 nanodomain organization, suggest that the plant cell modulates PD-PM and PM nanodomain dynamics to circumvent PVX infection. REM1. 3 overexpression restricts PVX local and systemic spreading in both Solanum lycopersicum [8] and Nicotiana benthamiana [33,36] (S2A and S2B Fig). Because REM1. 3 protein level is not affected by PVX infection (S2C and S2D Fig), we assumed that neither synthesis nor degradation of the protein is modified by PVX, but perhaps post-translational modifications. As REM1. 3 was originally discovered as a PM-associated phosphorylated protein [38], we first asked whether REM1. 3 could be phosphorylated by leaf protein extracts. Equal protein amounts of microsomal and soluble extracts from N. benthamiana leaves were used as a potential kinase source to phosphorylate affinity-purified full-length 6His-REM1. 3 in an in vitro kinase assay in the presence of ATP [γ-33P]. Autoradiography revealed the presence of a clear band corresponding to a phosphorylated form of 6His-REM1. 3 by kinase (s) present in the microsomal fraction (Fig 2A). The intensity of this band was completely abolished by competition with cold ATP, but not cold AMP, indicating a valid experimental set-up to study a genuine transphosphorylation event (S3A Fig). Phosphorylation of 6His-REM1. 3 was almost undetectable in soluble fractions, representing cytosolic kinases (Fig 2A). In silico analysis predicted phosphorylation sites throughout REM1. 3 sequence (Diphos, DEPP and NETPHOS prediction softwares). In agreement with the location of the sites presenting the highest phosphorylation potential, we experimentally found that REM1. 3 was phosphorylated in its N-terminal domain (residues 1–116, hereafter 6His: REM1. 3N) whereas the C-terminal domain (residues 117–198, hereafter 6His: REM1. 3C) did not present any detectable phosphorylation (S3B and S3C Fig). We next tested whether PVX activates the kinase (s) that phosphorylate (s) REM1. 3. Our results unveiled that microsomal and PM fractions extracted from symptomatic PVX-infected leaves promoted higher levels of 6His-REM1. 3 phosphorylation compared to non-infected plants (Fig 2B and 2C). Studies have shown that functionally different viral components, such as virus-encoded proteins and double-stranded RNA, can trigger plant defense responses [51–56]. We therefore examined whether the PVX genome in its free form was an eliciting signal for kinase activation. We found that the addition of total RNAs extracted from PVX-infected plants in the kinase reaction mix did not alter the levels of 6His-REM1. 3 phosphorylation (Fig 2D). We then examined whether the sole expression of individual viral movement proteins was sufficient to trigger REM1. 3 phosphorylation (Fig 2E). Importantly, our results demonstrated that the expression of TGBp1 and Coat Protein (CP) fused to GFP triggered the strongest levels of 6His-REM1. 3N phosphorylation to the same extent as the full PVX-GFP construct (Fig 2F and 2G and S3E Fig for controls of viral fluorescent-tagged protein expression as described in [41]). In good agreement, expression of a TGBp1-deleted version of PVX (PVXΔTGBp1) decreased 6His-REM1. 3 phosphorylation levels compared to wild-type PVX extracts (S3D Fig). Expression of TGBp2 and infiltration of the empty Agrobacterium strain alone protein also induced 6His-REM1. 3N phosphorylation, albeit less effective than TGBp1 and CP proteins (Fig 2F and 2G). In accordance with previous reports suggesting REM phosphorylation during plant-microbe interactions [9], Agrobacterium infected Ν. benthamiana extracts induced much stronger REM1. 3 phosphorylation than the water control condition (Fig 2F and 2G). Furthermore, we found that the 30K-RFP protein from Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) also induces REM phosphorylation (S3D Fig). Similar to PVX-TGBp1, REM1. 3 interferes with the ability of TMV-30K to increase PD permeability [33] and overexpression of REM1. 3 restricts TMV-GFP cell-to-cell movement in N. benthamiana epidermal cells (S4A Fig). Altogether our data suggest an additional role of REM-mediated plant response against TMV and possibly to bacteria. Our results also indicate that REM1. 3 phosphorylation status is modulated by the perception of viral proteins by plant cells. Since phosphorylation of REM occurs upon PVX infection, we next aimed to functionally characterize the importance of REM1. 3 phosphorylation for the regulation of PVX cell-to-cell movement. Despite our efforts, the identification of in vivo phosphorylation sites of REM1. 3 appeared technically challenging and remained unsuccessful. In silico predictions and in vitro kinase assays however showed that REM1. 3N displays regions of intrinsic disorder and presents the highest potential of phosphorylation (Fig 2C–2F and Fig 3A). For functional characterization, we selected the three putative phosphorylation Serine (S) /Threonine (T) sites present in REM1. 3N, namely S74, T86 and S91, that presented high scores of phosphorylation prediction in intrinsic disorder regions (Fig 3A). S74 and S91 are conserved across the phylogenetic group 1b of REM proteins, suggesting functional redundancy (S5A Fig) [32,57]. S74 and S91 were the analogous residues identified as phosphorylated in vivo in the group 1b REM AtREM1. 3 (At2g45820) of Arabidopsis thaliana (hereafter Arabidopsis) in a stimuli-dependent manner [39,40,57]. Biochemical analysis showed that α-1,4-poly-D-galacturonic acid (PGA) -induced phosphorylation of StREM1. 3 occurs on T32, S74 and T86 [58]. T86 is not conserved in Arabidopsis but it is conserved in Solanaceae REM proteins, such as in N. benthamiana (S5A Fig). By an in vitro kinase assay, we show that phosphorylation occurs within three potential phosphor-residues, since mutation of S74, T86 and S91 to the non-phosphorylatable Aspartic acid (D), generating the 6His-REM1. 3DDD mutant abolished REM phosphorylation by the PVX-activated kinase (s) (Fig 3B and 3C). To discriminate which residues are functionally relevant in the context of PVX-GFP propagation, we generated RFP-tagged REM1. 3 phosphomutants, individually mutated at those sites to the non-phosphorylatable Alanine. Transient expression in N. benthamiana coupled with PVX-GFP infection assays demonstrated that individual phospho-null mutations at those sites induce a loss of function of REM1. 3 in restricting PVX-GFP spreading (Fig 3D). This result suggests that phosphorylation of either S74, T86 and S91 is important for REM1. 3 function. To further characterize the relevance of different REM1. 3 phospho-statuses in the context of PVX-GFP propagation and PD-aperture regulation, we analysed RFP-tagged REM1. 3DDD to mimic constitutive phosphorylation hereafter termed phosphomimetic mutant, or to Alanine (REM1. 3AAA) hereafter termed phosphodead mutant. Infection assays in N. benthamiana confirmed that the phosphodead mutant completely lost REM1. 3 ability to restrict PVX-GFP cell-to-cell movement, while the phosphomimetic mutant maintained this ability (Fig 3D). TMV-GFP propagation was similarly affected by the phospho-status of REM1. 3 (S4A Fig). We then analyzed the capacity of REM1. 3 phosphomutants to regulate PD aperture in the absence of viral infection. As previously described [33,36], RFP-REM1. 3 reduces the PD size-exclusion limit as measured by free-GFP cell-to-cell diffusion (Fig 3E). Detailed analysis of REM1. 3 phosphorylation mutants demonstrated that the phosphomimetic mutant recapitulated REM1. 3 activity towards PD-aperture regulation, while the phosphodead mutant did not (Fig 3E). Altogether, these results provide strong evidence that REM1. 3' s phosphorylation state at the evolutionarily conserved positions of S74, T86 and S91 is linked to its function in controlling viral infection and PD conductance. Both REM1. 3 phosphomimetic and phosphodead mutants maintained PM localization, similarly to wild-type REM1. 3, when transiently expressed in fusion with YFP in N. benthamiana (S4B Fig). Upon PVX infection we observed a modulation of REM1. 3 PD-association and PM dynamics (Fig 1), linked to REM1. 3 phosphorylation (Fig 2) that is required for REM1. 3 function against PVX infection (Fig 3). We then asked whether different REM1. 3 phospho-statuses might regulate its lateral organization at the PM and PD compartments in the absence of PVX. We examined the enrichment of REM1. 3 YFP-tagged phosphomutants at the PD pit fields, previously calculated by the PD index (S1 Fig) and found that similarly to YFP-REM1. 3, none of the phosphomutants appeared enriched at the pit field level (Fig 4A and 4C). The phosphodead mutant appeared statistically more excluded than YFP-REM1. 3, whereas the phosphomimetic mutant displayed an increase of its PD index (Fig 4C), reminiscent of the REM1. 3 localization phenotype under PVX infection (Fig 1A and 1B). Importantly, REM1. 3 phosphomutants’ association with PD was directly correlated with callose content at PD (Fig 4B). These observations reinforced the hypothesis that REM1. 3-mediated increase of callose levels at PD is associated with a dynamic and phosphorylation-dependent redistribution of REM1. 3 to the PD surroundings. We next used spt-PALM VAEM to characterize the localization and mobility behaviour of the EOS-REM1. 3 phosphomutants in the PM plane. The analysis of reconstructed trajectories and corresponding super-resolved localization maps indicated slight modifications of lateral mobility behavior between the phosphomutants (Fig 4D and 4E). Quantification of the diffusion coefficient values (D) extracted for each individual molecule revealed that EOS-REM1. 3AAA displayed a more immobile behavior than EOS-REM1. 3DDD and EOS-REM1. 3. Consistently, EOS-REM1. 3DDD exhibited a higher mobility illustrated by higher diffusion coefficient and mean square displacement values (Fig 4D and 4E). Analysis of the supra-molecular organization of the phosphomutants by Voronoï tessellation (Fig 4F) firstly showed that all mutants displayed similar nanodomain size and localization density compared to EOS-REM1. 3WT. Compared to EOS-REM1. 3AAA, the EOS-REM1. 3DDD nanodomains occupied a smaller area of the total PM and their density in the PM plane appeared slightly reduced (Fig 4F and 4G). A higher number of nanodomains were formed with the EOS-REM1. 3AAA mutant. Hence, the phosphomimetic mutations favor a less confined and a more dynamic localization pattern of REM1. 3 at the PM, reminiscent to the phenotype of EOS-REM1. 3WT in the context of PVX infection (Fig 1C and 1D). These results suggest that differential REM1. 3 phosphorylation is involved in regulating REM1. 3 mobility and PM domain organization and support the hypothesis that REM1. 3 phosphorylation on S74, T86 and S91 reflects an ‘active form’ of the protein necessary for REM1. 3-mediated defense signaling. To gain more insights into the signaling processes leading to REM1. 3 phosphorylation, we aimed to biochemically characterize the kinase (s) involved in the phosphorylation of REM1. 3. Previous evidence suggested that the kinase (s) phosphorylating REM1. 3 are membrane-associated (Fig 2) [38]. We therefore biochemically analyzed the localization of the kinase (s) phosphorylating REM1. 3. Plant material from healthy and PVX-GFP-infected leaves was cell-fractionated to obtain crude extracts, soluble and microsomal fractions [59] to perform in vitro kinase assays on REM1. 3N. Analysis confirmed a maximal kinase activity in purified microsomes (Figs 5A and 2A). Since a kinase in close proximity with its substrate would enhance reaction kinetics [60] and signal fidelity [61], and given that REM1. 3 is enriched in detergent-resistant membranes (DRM) [8], we investigated whether the kinase activity towards 6His-REM1. 3 is enriched in this biochemical fraction. We included “control PM” (C-PM) preparations, submitted to discontinuous sucrose gradients but in the absence of Triton-X100 treatments [62]. In vitro kinase assays on 6His-REM1. 3N showed that the kinase activity in C-PM was 5 times inferior than in freshly purified PM not submitted to the sucrose gradient, suggesting that the kinase is not stable during the overnight purification procedure. Only half of the specific activity of the kinase was found in DRMs compared to the C-PM fraction, indicating that the kinase (s) phosphorylating REM1. 3 is (are) only partially located in the DRM fraction (Fig 5B). To gain more information concerning the biochemical characteristics of the kinase phosphorylating REM1. 3, we analyzed its activity in the presence of known inhibitors. We firstly tested staurosporine, [63,64] a general inhibitor that prevents ATP binding to kinases. We found an inhibition of REM1. 3 phosphorylation starting at very low concentrations (30 nM) (S6A Fig). We further tested the effect of poly-L-lysine, described to stimulate the activity of the CK2 kinases and inhibit several CDPK kinases [65,66]. No significant differences on REM1. 3 phosphorylation levels were observed under increasing concentrations of poly-L-lysine (S6B Fig). The addition of the wide range of Ser/Thr phosphatases inhibitor β-glycerophosphate (BGP) [66] to the reaction mix did not alter the levels of phosphorylated 6His-REM1. 3, indicating that the observed data was due to the activation of kinase activity by PVX rather than by inhibition of phosphatases (S6B Fig). Competition assays in the presence of cold AMP and GTP showed that only cold ATP even at 2 mM caused 20-fold depletion in [γ-33P] incorporation, suggesting that ATP is the major phosphoryl-donor for the kinase (S6B Fig). Addition in the reaction mix of 0,2 mM of EGTA, a chelator of Ca2+, strongly inhibited the kinase activity suggesting that the kinase (s) phosphorylating REM1. 3 in healthy leaves is calcium sensitive (S6C Fig). Calcium is a conserved second messenger in signal transduction during biotic and abiotic stress. In plants, kinases harboring different calcium sensitivities can perceive calcium variations and translate them into downstream signaling activation [67,68]. To determine whether the PVX-activated kinase phosphorylating REM1. 3 is sensitive to calcium regulation, in vitro kinase assays from microsomes of healthy and PVX-infected N. benthamiana leaves were assayed in the presence of free calcium (Ca2+) concentrations ranging from 10 nM to 0,1 mM. Fig 5C shows that the kinase (s) displays a high sensitivity to calcium with an optimal activity in the presence of 10 μM of free Ca2+. At this concentration, a 5-fold increase of 6His-REM1. 3N phosphorylation was observed in PVX-infected leaves (Fig 5C). These experiments allowed us to narrow-down the kinase (s) phosphorylating REM1. 3 after PVX infection to the group of membrane-bound Ca2+-dependent protein kinases [67]. Plants possess three main families of calcium-regulated kinases: calmodulin-binding kinases (CBKs), calcineurin B-like-interacting protein kinases (CIPKs) and calcium-dependent protein kinases (CPKs) [67]. CPKs have the unique feature of calcium sensing and responding activities in one single polypeptide, best characterized in the model plant Arabidopsis [67]. Based on the measured calcium dose response (Fig 5C), we correlated the kinase phosphorylating REM1. 3 in N. benthamiana with homologs of Arabidopsis subgroup II AtCPKs [69], and we aimed to capitalize on the knowledge of Arabidopsis CPKs to test REM1. 3 phosphorylation. Among the characterized members of subgroup II AtCPKs, we selected the Arabidopsis AtCPK3 as a good candidate to test its putative role in REM1. 3 phosphorylation, since previous proteomics studies in Arabidopsis have identified both AtCPK3 and AtREM1. 3 as being enriched in PM, PD and DRM fractions [22,70]. In addition, one study showed that AtREM1. 3 from microsomal fractions is phosphorylated in vitro by AtCPK3 [71]. We therefore predicted that REM1. 3 might share common functions with the evolutionarily conserved group 1b Arabidopsis REMs [32]. AtREM1. 2 and AtREM1. 3 are close homologs to REM1. 3 and group 1 N. benthamiana REMs (NbREMs) in term of protein sequence [32,36] and they conserved at least the S74 and S91 phosphorylation sites [39], [40,57] (S5A Fig). Using super-resolution microscopy, Demir et al. showed that, when co-expressed in Arabidopsis leaves, REM1. 3 and AtREM1. 3 co-localized in the same PM-nanodomains [72]. Importantly, transient expression of AtREM1. 2 and AtREM1. 3 in N. benthamiana epidermal cells impaired PVX-GFP cell-to-cell movement, as REM1. 3 does (S5B Fig), strengthening the hypothesis that the function of group 1 REMs might be conserved between homologs in different plant species [36]. We assayed the in vitro phosphorylation activity of the affinity-purified AtCPK3-GST towards the 6His-REM1. 3, the 6His-REM1. 3N and the 6His-REM1. 3C, as well as the homologous substrate 6His-AtREM1. 2. Similar to our previous results (S3B and S3C Fig), AtCPK3-GST could phosphorylate strongly both 6His-REM1. 3 and 6His-REM1. 3N, but not 6His-REM1. 3C (Fig 5D). In accordance with the effect of AtREM1. 2 in PVX-GFP propagation (S5B Fig), AtCPK3-GST can also phosphorylate 6His-AtREM1. 2 (Fig 5E). Addition of Ca2+ is essential for a strong kinase activity as shown by both kinase auto-phosphorylation and trans-phosphorylation (Fig 5D and 5E). AtCPK3-GST specifically phosphorylated S74, T86 and S91 residues of REM1. 3, since the phosphorylation was abolished in the phosphomimetic mutant 6His-REM1. 3DDD (Fig 5F). These results suggest that AtCPK3 is a good candidate for group 1b REM phosphorylation and further support that the S74, T86, and S91 are the phosphorylation sites of REM1. 3 (Figs 3A and 5E). CPKs harbor a variable N-terminal domain, a Ser/Thr kinase domain, an auto-inhibitory junction region and a regulatory calmodulin-like domain. The calmodulin-like domain contains four EF-hand binding motifs that determine the sensitivity of each kinase to calcium [73,74]. To investigate the role of AtCPK3 in REM-dependent signalling, we generated AtCPK3 mutants presenting altered kinase activities. Deletion of the inhibitory junction region and the regulatory calmodulin-like domain in CPKs creates a constitutive active kinase while mutation of the aspartic acid residue in the catalytic center ‘DLK’ motif of the kinase domain to an alanine (D202A) creates a catalytically inactive or ‘dead’ kinase [67] (Fig 6A). We generated AtCPK3 full-length (AtCPK3), constitutive active (AtCPK3CA, residues 1–342) and kinase-dead (AtCPK3CAD202A) constructs for transient protein expression (Fig 6A). We evaluated their catalytic activities by expressing them transiently in Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts and performing immunoprecipitation coupled to kinase assays using 6His-REM1. 3 and histone as a generic substrate [67]. Autoradiography confirmed that in vivo purified AtCPK3CA-HA could trans-phosphorylate both 6His-REM1. 3 and histone without the addition of calcium, while the point mutation D202A drastically abolished kinase activity (S7 Fig). We next examined the sub-cellular localization of both AtCPK3 and AtCPK3CA fused to YFP and found that both proteins disclosed a partial association with the PM, which was further confirmed by their presence, after cell fractionation, in the microsomal fraction at the expected molecular weight (Fig 6B) in good agreement with [71]. We further used AtCPK3CA to test the interaction with group 1b REMs. Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation (BiFC) experiments showed that AtCPK3CA and REM1. 3, REM1. 3AAA and REM1. 3DDD interact together at the level of the PM in planta. Importantly, we also confirmed the interaction of AtCPK3CA with homologous AtREM1. 2 and AtREM1. 3 (Fig 6C). REM1. 3/REM1. 3 interaction was used as a positive control, and AtCPK3CA /AtCPK3CA as a negative control. We finally aimed to functionally characterize the AtCPK3- and REM1. 3-mediated signaling in the context of PVX infection. Transient over-expression of AtCPK3-RFP alone induces a reduction of PVX-GFP infection foci suggesting that AtCPK3 is indeed important for antiviral responses in plant cells (Fig 6D). Expression of the constitutively-active AtCPK3CA-RFP had a stronger effect on PVX-GFP spreading and to a similar degree with the over-expression of REM1. 3 alone (Fig 6D). AtCPK3' s function towards PVX movement was observed to be mediated by its kinase activity, as the expression of the catalytically inactive mutant AtCPK3CAD202A had no effect on PVX-GFP propagation (Fig 6D). This raised the question whether the effect of AtCPK3CA on PVX propagation was REM-dependent. To tackle this question, we stably transformed N. benthamiana plants with a hairpin construct, to induce post-transcriptional gene silencing, which resulted in lowering RNA and protein expression of group 1 endogenous NbREMs (S8A and S8B Fig). Consistent with previous studies [8], silencing of group 1 REM correlates with an increase of PVX-GFP cell-to-cell movement in inoculated leaves (S8C Fig). No difference was observed by ELISA when measuring PVX accumulation in systemic leaves (S8D Fig). Importantly, PVX assays demonstrated that AtCPK3CA ability to restrict PVX movement was impaired in two independent N. benthamiana lines underexpressing group 1 REM levels, (namely lines 1. 4 and 10. 2 with expression levels decreased respectively by 2 and 20 times) (Fig 6E), indicating that REMs might be the direct substrate of CPK3 in vivo. Altogether, these data suggest that CPK3 and group 1 REMs are major regulators involved in signaling and antiviral defense at the PM level.
  Understanding how plants defend themselves against viruses remains a challenging field. The canonical plant immune response against viruses is mainly represented by the mechanism of RNA silencing [78,79], while additional mechanisms of plant antiviral defense involve hormonal signaling, protein degradation, suppression of protein synthesis and metabolic regulation [51,78,80]. Antiviral defense presents similarities to the immune response against microbes [81–83]. Compelling evidence suggests that cell-surface as well as intracellular plant immune receptors recognize viral elicitors [55,84–89]. An additional number of host cell components have been shown genetically to affect viral replication or cell-to-cell movement [8,90], indicating that more sophisticated plant defense mechanisms against viruses may exist. For instance, manipulation of REM levels in transgenic Solanaceae suggested that REM is as a positive regulator of defense against the PVX by affecting viral cell-to-cell movement [8,14,36]. We recently showed that REM1. 3 does not interfere with the suppressor ability of PVX movement protein TGBp1, but specifically affects its gating ability [33]. Group 1 REMs could be a target for viruses (and other pathogens) to circumvent infection as illustrated by the case of Rice Stripe Virus that targets NbREM1 for degradation by 26S proteasome [91]. Nevertheless, in this study we show that REM1. 3 protein levels are not altered during PVX infection (S2C and S2D Fig). In this paper, we provide supporting mechanistic evidence that REM1. 3 regulates the levels of callose accumulation at PD pit fields during PVX infection (Fig 1). Whether this function is mediated by a direct interaction with callose synthase/glucanase complexes remains however still unknown. Surprisingly, we found that REM1. 3 is not dramatically recruited to PD pit fields, although its PD index is slightly increased after PVX infection (Fig 1). This suggests that association of a sub-fraction of the REM1. 3 to the PD-PM region may be sufficient to increase callose accumulation, although we cannot rule out the possibility that REM1. 3 may regulate PD permeability via a more indirect mechanism. The spt-PALM VAEM microscopy data supports an increase of protein mobility and redistribution to distinct domains during PVX infection (Fig 1). These findings indicate the existence of a mechanism that operates at specific REM1. 3-associated PM nanodomains, capable of regulating PD permeability (Fig 1). The dynamic partitioning between PM nanodomains and PD pit fields needs to be further studied. Since various studies have reported REM phosphorylation during plant-microbe interactions [16,17,39,40], we set out to address which kinase phosphorylates REM and whether REM1. 3 phosphorylation plays a role in REM-mediated anti-viral defense. Indeed, our experimental findings show that plant PVX sensing induces the activation of a membrane-bound calcium-dependent protein kinase that in turn phosphorylates REM1. 3 (Fig 2, Fig 5). Importantly, we show that the kinase able to phosphorylate REM1. 3 is activated specifically by the expression of two PVX proteins, namely CP and TGBp1. Deciphering the exact mechanisms allowing the molecular recognition of those PVX components will be a crucial step toward understanding REM-mediated anti-viral defense. Intriguingly, the finding that the presence of Agrobacterium also induces REM1. 3 phosphorylation (Fig 2G) is in agreement with previous reports suggesting phosphorylation of REMs under bacterial infection [39,40] and suggests that phosphorylation should be also a way to regulate -yet unknown functions- of REM1. 3 in bacterial defense. Genetic studies have established that different CPKs comprise critical plant signaling hubs by sensing and translating pathogen-induced changes of calcium concentrations [67,68]. Biochemical characterization of the kinase phosphorylating 6His-REM1. 3 showed that its strong sensitivity to calcium (Fig 5C) corresponds to homologs of phylogenetic subgroup II CPKs from Arabidopsis [67]. CPK3 is a prominent member of subgroup II, shown to function in stomatal ABA signaling [92], in salt stress response [71,93] and in a defense response against an herbivore [94]. Interestingly, it was suggested that AtREM1. 3 from taxonomical group 1 of REMs could be a substrate for AtCPK3 in response to salt stress [71]. Here we show that AtCPK3 can interact in vivo with group 1 REM (Fig 6C) and that AtCPK3 phosphorylates group 1 REM in an in vitro kinase assay (Fig 5D). Transient overexpression of AtCPK3 in N. benthamiana resulted in a reduction of PVX propagation in a REM-dependent manner, providing compelling evidence that CPK3 together with REM contribute to the plant antiviral immunity. This is the first report demonstrating the participation of CPKs in plant basal immunity against viruses. Although [95] reports that there is no calcium signal during early recognition of PVX, the activation of CPKs by PVX supports the notion that calcium might be involved in some other late steps of plant-virus interaction like the control of intercellular connectivity. These changes in calcium concentrations in the cell are sensed by the CPKs and translated via the phosphorylation of REM and/or other unknown downstream components. In Nicotiana tabacum calmodulin isoforms are critical for the plant resistance against Tobacco Mosaic Virus and Cucumber Mosaic Virus, further illustrating the existence of virus-specific patterns of calcium signals [96,97]. More work is needed to identify the CPK family members participating to the response and also the nature and specificity of those PVX-induced calcium changes. AtCPK3 specifically phosphorylated REM1. 3 at its N-terminal domain (residues 1–116), a domain displaying a mostly intrinsically disordered secondary structure (Figs 3A and 5). In silico analysis followed by a mutagenesis approach coupled with in vitro kinase assays revealed three major putative phosphorylation sites for REM1. 3, namely S74, T86 and S91 on REM1. 3. The in vitro phosphorylation of REM1. 3 (Figs 3A and 5E) is almost totally lost when S74, T86 and S91 are mutated to non-phosphorylable residues, confirming these residues as major REM1. 3 phosphorylation sites. Individual phospho-null mutations at those sites impaired REM1. 3 ability to restrict PVX cell-to-cell movement to various extent (Fig 3D). The triple phospho-null mutant, YFP-REM1. 3AAA totally obliterated REM1. 3' s capability to restrict PVX cell-to-cell movement (Fig 3D) and to regulate PD permeability (Fig 3E). Reciprocally, REM1. 3 triple phosphomimetic mutant, RFP-REM1. 3DDD appeared fully functional (Fig 3E and 3F). These results strongly support the functional involvement of single or combined phosphorylation in the N-terminal domain of S74, T86 and S91 to establish REM’s function in the context of PVX infection. This is in contrast with LjSYMREM1 from Lotus japonicus which was shown to be phosphorylated at its C-terminal domain in vitro by SYMRK [16]. Despite the fact that phosphorylation of REM proteins has been widely reported [16,17,39,40,57], this work firstly describes an associated role of REM-induced phosphorylation with its function. Our finding that overexpression of AtREM1. 2 and AtREM1. 3 also restricts PVX-GFP cell-to-cell movement (S5B Fig) suggests that REM phosphorylation and its associated functions might be conserved for some REMs of taxonomic group 1b. In good agreement, AtREM1. 2 and AtREM1. 3 localize to the same PM nanodomains [72] and maintain conserved phosphorylation sites with REM1. 3 (S5A Fig). By contrast, AtREM4. 1 from subgroup 4, presenting a different N-terminal domain and different expected phosphorylation profile has an opposite effect against geminiviral propagation by promoting susceptibility to Beet curly top virus and Beet severe curly top virus [17,57]. This further argues that REMs might be phosphorylated by diverse families of kinases in order to respond to different stimuli [57]. Overexpression of REM1. 3 restricts TMV propagation (S4A Fig), and additionally modulates the movement proteins from different virus genera [33,91]. These findings suggest that the initial hypothesis that REM1. 3 causes the sequestration of the PVX virions at the PD [8] might not hold true, but rather that REM1. 3 might have a more general role in plant stress and PD regulation (Figs 1 and 3). Interestingly, REM1. 3 promotes susceptibility to Phytophthora infestans in N. benthamiana and localizes exclusively to the PM and the extrahaustorial membrane around non-callosic haustoria [42]. The exact role of REM1. 3 as a common regulator of different signaling pathways and its role in PD permeability regulation remains to be determined. It has been speculated that phosphorylation in intrinsically disorder regions of proteins may act as a molecular switch and confer potential protein-protein interaction plasticity [76,98]. The intrinsically disordered REM1. 3 N-terminal domain exhibits the most sequence variability in REM proteins, presumably conferring signaling specificity [32,57]. Phosphorylation of AtREM1. 3' s N-terminal domain could stabilize coil-coiled-associated protein trimerization and protein-protein interactions [57]. Phosphorylated REM1. 3 seems to be further targeted to PD-PM to trigger callose deposition. In good agreement, we found that the mobility in the PM of REM1. 3 changed depending on its phospho-status (Fig 4). The triple phosphomimetic mutant exhibited a less confined and more mobile behavior at the PM, reminiscent of the WT protein in the context of PVX infection (Fig 4D). Similarly to the role of 14. 3. 3 proteins in plants [99], REM1. 3 could act as a scaffolding protein, interacting with multiple members of a signaling pathway and tethering them into complexes to specific areas of the membrane. Hence, REM1. 3 phosphorylation could act as a regulatory switch of protein conformations that would modulate REM1. 3 specific interaction patterns and transient signalosomes at the PM. The triple phosphomimetic REM mutant might reflect a ‘functionally active’ form that constitutes REM-guided signalosomes against PVX-infection at the PM and should be exploited in future studies. The study of the phosphorylation-dependent interactions of REM1. 3 (and related phosphocode) in regard to the modulation of REM1. 3 PM dynamics and molecular function is the topic for future studies.
  Nicotiana benthamiana plants were cultivated in controlled conditions (16 h photoperiod, 25 °C). Proteins were transiently expressed via Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation for virus and PD functional assays as in [14,33] or for the localization experiments as described in the appendix. For subcellular localization studies and protein extractions, plants were analyzed 2 or at 4 days after inoculation (DAI) in the phosphorylation assays. Imaging for PVX-GFP spreading assays and plasmodesmata GFP-diffusion experiments were done at 5 DAI. PVX inoculation for test ELISA was performed at 4-week-old N. benthamiana plants. Details on molecular cloning and protein work, transgenic lines generation are described in the Appendix. All vectors constructs were generated using classical Gateway cloning strategies (www. lifetechnologies. com), pDONR211 and pDONR207 as entry vectors, and pK7WGY2, pK7YWG2, pK7WGR2, pK7RWG2, and pGWB14 and pGWB15 as destination vectors [100]. The REM1. 31–116, REM1. 3117–198 and REM1. 3 single S74A, T86A and S91A and triple S74/T86/S91AAA and S74/T86/S91DDD mutants were synthesized in a pUC57 vector (including the AttB sites) by Genscript (http: //www. genscript. com/) or GENEWIZ (http: //www. genewiz. com/) and next cloned to Gateway destination vectors. AtCPK3D202A mutant was generated by site-directed mutagenesis as previously described [101] with minor modifications. For BiFC experiments, the genes of interest were cloned into pSITE-BIFC- C1nec, -C1cec, -N1nen, and–N1cen destination vectors [102]. To map the dynamics of single molecules with sptPALM, REM1. 3 and phosphomutants were cloned in fusion with EOS in the gateway compatible vector pUBN-Dest: : EOS [103]. EOS protein has been widely use for single molecule localization microscopy in mammals, bacteria, and plant cells. It corresponds to the name of a fluorescent protein from the stony coral Lobophyllia hemprichii which peculiarity resides in its photoconvertability. The energy of UV light can break the core polypeptidic chain of EOS fluorescent protein inducing changes in EOS spectral fluorescence properties. Due to the stochasticity of EOS photoconversion at low UV radiation (space and number of events/sec can be controlled by modulating UV laser power), single molecules can be converted, localized and tracked. Leaf discs were cut from N. benthamiana leaves, transferred on petri plates containing culture medium (complete Murashige and Skoog medium (MS) supplemented with 30g/L saccharose, pH 5,8; phytoagar HP696 (Kalys) 5,5 g/L and the hormones: AIA 0,1 mg/L, BAP 2 mg/L) and incubated for 48 h in the growth room (16 h photoperiod, 30 μmol photons. m2. s-1,23 °C). For the transformation, the N. benthamiana plants disk leaves were incubated with the Agrobacterium cultures (GV3101 strain) carrying the plasmid of interest for 20 min. The leaf samples were next placed on plates with the complete medium previously described. 48 hours later, the leaf fragments were washed 3 times with sterile water (with 0,1% Tween20). The leaf fragments were next washed with MS complete medium supplemented with Timentin (300 μg/mL). The leaves were next placed on plates with regeneration medium (MS culture medium, as previously described, supplemented with 300 mg/L of timentin and 150 mg/l of kanamycin). The plates were next incubated in the growth room. The explants were transferred to fresh regeneration medium with a maximum periodicity of 7 days until the development of callus. The regenerated seedlings were transferred to a rooting medium (MS, sucrose 30 g/L, phytoagar 5,5 g/L, timentin 200 mg/L, kanamycin 150 mg/L). The regenerated plants (T0) were transferred to the greenhouse for growth and self-fertilization. Homozygous T2 lines carrying a single transgene insertion were selected by segregation analysis on selective Kanamycin media and used for physiological studies and phenotypic characterization. The expression of the GFP-REM1. 3 or silencing levels of endogenous NbREMs was controlled by cytological, biochemical and expression analysis. Cytological analysis of the GFP-REM1. 3 expression in all leaf cells was performed to avoid chimeric expression, see S2A and S2B Fig. Four-week-old N. benthamiana greenhouse plants grown at 22–24 °C were used for Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transient expression. A. tumefaciens were pre-cultured at 28 °C overnight and used as inoculum for culture at initial OD600nm of 0. 15 in pre-warmed media. Cultures were grown until OD600nm reached 0. 6 to 0. 8 values (3–5 h). Cultures were then centrifuged at 3,200 g for 5 min, pellet were washed twice, using water to the desired OD600nm. Bacterial suspensions at OD600nm of 0. 2 and 0. 1 were used for subcellular localization and Spt-PALM experiments, respectively. The bacterial suspensions were inoculated using a 1-mL syringe without a needle by gentle pressure through a <1mm-hole punched on the lower epidermal surface [104]. Transformed plants were incubated under normal growth conditions for 2 days at 22–24 °C. Transformed N. benthamiana leaves were analyzed 2–5 DAI depending on the experiment. PVX-GFP cell-to-cell movement experiments were performed as previously described [14,36], with minor modifications. Briefly, A. tumefaciens strain GV3101 carrying the constructs tested were infiltrated at a final optical density at 600 nm (OD600nm) = 0. 2 together with the same strain carrying the plasmid pGr208, which expresses the PVX-GFP complementary DNA harboring GFP placed under the control of a Coat protein promoter, as well as the helper plasmid pSoup [105] at final OD600nm of 0. 001. Viral spreading of PVX-GFP was visualized by epifluorescence microscopy (using GFP long pass filter on a Nikon Eclipse E800 with x4 objective coupled to a Coolsnap HQ2 camera) at 5 DAI and the area of at least 30 of PVX-GFP infection foci was measured using Fiji software (http: //www. fiji. sc/) via a homemade macro or ImageJ. The expression levels of transiently expressed constructs were confirmed by Western blot. ELISA tests in systemic N. benthamiana leaves were performed similarly to [8] to follow the global virus accumulation. Briefly, GFP-REM1. 3 or hpREM plants were mechanically inoculated with PVX, and viral accumulation in systemically invaded leaves (at 3 nodes above the inoculated leaf) was evaluated at 10 or 14 DAI with a specific anti-PVX coat protein antibody (Sediag). Five plants per line for GFP-REM1. 3 and 8 for hpREM plants were tested per experiment. GFP diffusion at PD experiments was performed as previously described [33]. All the experiments were repeated at least three times. Live imaging was performed using a Leica SP5 confocal laser scanning microscopy system (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) equipped with Argon, DPSS and He-Ne lasers and hybrid detectors. N. benthamiana leaf samples were gently transferred between a glass slide and a cover slip in a drop of water. YFP and mCitrine (cYFP) fluorescence were observed with similar settings (i. e. , excitation wavelengths of 488 nm and emission wavelengths of 490 to 550 nm). In order to obtain quantitative data, experiments were performed using strictly identical confocal acquisition parameters (e. g. laser power, gain, zoom factor, resolution, and emission wavelengths reception), with detector settings optimized for low background and no pixel saturation. Pseudo-colored images were obtained using the “Red hot” look-up-table (LUT) of Fiji software (http: //www. fiji. sc/). All quantifications were performed for at least 10 cells, at least two plants by condition with at least 3 independent replicates. BiFC images were taken 2 DAI by confocal microscopy (Zeiss LSM 880). Quantification of fluorescent intensities was performed by ImageJ, as described in [36]. N. benthamiana epidermal cells were imaged at room temperature (RT). Samples of leaves of 2-week-old plants expressing EOS constructs were mounted between a glass slide and a cover slip in a drop of water to avoid dehydration. Acquisitions were done on an inverted motorized microscope Nikon Ti Eclipse (Nikon France S. A. S. , Champigny-sur-Marne, France) equipped with a 100× oil-immersion PL-APO objective (NA = 1. 49), a TIRF arm, a Perfect Focus System (PFS), allowing long acquisition in oblique illumination mode, and a sensitive Evolve EMCCD camera (Photometrics, Tucson, USA). Images acquisitions and processing were done as previously described [45]. Single molecule fluorescent spots were localized in each image frame and tracked over time using image processing techniques such as a combination of wavelet segmentation [106] and simulated annealing algorithms [107]. The software package used to extract quantitative data on protein localization and dynamics is custom written as a plug-in running within the MetaMorph software environment. This plugin is now property of Molecular devices company (https: //www. moleculardevices. com/sites/default/files/en/assets/product-brochures/dd/img/metamorph-super-resolution-software. pdf). Single molecule localization organization analysis, Log (δ1/δ) correspond to the ratio between the local molecule density to overall molecule density at the PM. After correction for artefacts due to multiple single-molecule localization (described in [36] and now presented in materiel and methods section), we computed potential nanodomain by applying a threshold δ1i>2δN, where δN is the average localization density at PM level and δ1i is the density in presumed protein-forming nanodomain, with a minimal area of 32 nm2 and with at least 5 localizations per nanodomain. SR-Tesseler software was used to produce Voronoï diagrams, and subsequently quantify molecule organization parameters as previously recommended [50]. Taking in account fluorophore photophysical parameters, localization accuracy and the first rank of local density of fluorescent molecules, correction for multiple detections occurring in a vicinity of space (w) and blinking tolerance time interval (t) are identified as the same molecule, merged together and replaced by a new detection at a location corresponding to their barycentre. Because first rank of local density of fluorescent molecules was below 0. 5 mol/mm2 (c. a ranking from 0. 1 to 0. 3 mol/mm2), we used a fixed search radius w of 48 nm as recommended [50]. To determine the correct time interval t, the photophysics of the fluorophore namely the off-time, number of blinks per molecule and on-time distributions are computed for each cell. For example, for a dataset composed of 618,502 localizations, the average number of blinks per molecule was 1. 42, and the number of molecules after cleaning was 315,929. As a control, the number of emission bursts (439,331), counted with t = 0, divided by the average number of blinks per molecule (1. 42) was only 2. 15% different. After correction for artefacts due to multiple single-molecule localization, we computed potential cluster using a threshold d1i>2dN, where dN is the average localization density at PM level and d1i is the density in presumed protein-forming nanocluster, with a minimal area of 32 nm2 and with at least five localization by cluster. Over the two independent experiments 54 446 single molecule trajectories have been observed (34 740 Mock / 19 706 PVX). We then computed single molecule mobility behavior (Diffusion coefficient and Mean square displacement) using trajectories of at least 8 time points (tracked for at least 0. 16 s; representing 19495 trajectories in total, 12073 for Mock condition and 7422 for PVX condition). Prediction of putative phosphorylation sites was performed by Diphos, DEPP and NETPHOS coupled with published data. Disordered domains were performed by pDONR VL XT. 6His-REM1. 3 and mutant recombinant proteins were purified from bacteria using fast flow chelating sepharose resin (Amersham) according to manufacturer’s instructions and as in [14]. For the in vitro REM1. 3 phosphorylation assays about 2 μg of total plant extracts were incubated with 1 μg of affinity-purified 6His: REM1. 3 protein variants for 10 minutes at room temperature and in a phosphorylation buffer (Tris-HCl 30mM, EDTA 5mM, MgCl2 15mM, DTT 1mM, Na3VO4 2,5 mM, NaF 10 mM and 10 μCi/reaction ATP [γ-33P]- (3000Ci/mmol, Perkinelmer). The buffer contained also 10–5 M of free Ca2+ which allows the detection of 6His-REM1. 3 phosphorylation also in mock conditions. Gradual concentrations of free Ca2+ as in [108] were added for Fig 5C. Reactions were performed for 15 minutes in a volume of 25 μl. The reactions were stopped by the addition of 15 μl of 6x loading buffer. Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and phosphorylation status of REM1. 3 was analysed by autoradiography using a phosphor-Imager and quantified by ImageQuant TL program. CPK3-HA was transiently expressed in mesophyll protoplasts and immunopurified with anti-HA antibodies as performed in [109] while CPK3-GST recombinant protein was purified from bacterial extracts as reported in [69]. For in vitro kinase assays, the tagged CPK was incubated with 0. 5–1 μg histone or 6His-REM1. 3 proteins in the following kinase reaction buffer (20 mM Tris HCl pH 7. 5,10 mM MgCl2,1 mM DTT, 50 μM cold ATP, ATP [γ-33P] 2 μCi per reaction, 1 mM CaCl2 or 5 mM EGTA) in a volume of 15 μL for 30 min at RT. The reaction was stopped with 5 μL 4X Laemmli buffer, then samples were heated at 95 °C for 3 min. Proteins samples were separated by SDS-PAGE on 12% acrylamide gel. After migration, the gel was dried before exposing against a phosphorScreen to reveal radioactivity on a Storm Imaging system (GE Heathcare). The gel was then rehydrated for Coomassie staining. SDS-PAGE, Western Blot analysis, protein extractions and recombinant protein purification were performed in E. coli as in [14]. Cell fractionation and extractions followed the established protocol from [59] and [62]. Anti-REM antibodies were previously described in [8]. All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files are available from Arabidopsis Genome Initiative (https: //www. arabidopsis. org/index. jsp), and GenBank/EMBL (https: //www. ncbi. nlm. nih. gov/genbank/) databases under the accession numbers: StREM1. 3 (NP_001274989), AtREM1. 2 (At3g61260), AtREM1. 3 (At2g45820), AtCPK3 (At4g23650).
summary: Viruses propagate in plants through membranous channels, called plasmodesmata, linking each cell to its neighboring cell. In this work, we challenge the role of the plasma membrane in the regulation of virus propagation. By studying the dynamics and the activation of a plant-specific protein called REMORIN, we found that the way this protein is organized inside the membrane is crucial to fulfill its function in the immunity of plants against viruses.
keywords: phosphorylation
  plant anatomy
  brassica
  microbiology
  biochemical analysis
  membrane proteins
  plant science
  in vitro kinase assay
  enzyme assays
  model organisms
  experimental organism systems
  bioassays and physiological analysis
  plants
  cellular structures and organelles
  extraction techniques
  bacteria
  agrobacteria
  arabidopsis thaliana
  research and analysis methods
  protein extraction
  plant microbiology
  animal studies
  proteins
  agrobacterium tumefaciens
  leaves
  cell membranes
  biochemistry
  eukaryota
  plant and algal models
  cell biology
  post-translational modification
  biology and life sciences
  organisms
title: REM1.3's phospho-status defines its plasma membrane nanodomain organization and activity in restricting PVX cell-to-cell movement