article: Human remodeling and spacing factor (RSF) consists of a heterodimer of Rsf-1 and hSNF2H, a counterpart of Drosophila ISWI. RSF possesses not only chromatin remodeling activity but also chromatin assembly activity in vitro. While no other single factor can execute the same activities as RSF, the biological significance of RSF remained unknown. To investigate the in vivo function of RSF, we generated a mutant allele of Drosophila Rsf-1 (dRsf-1). The dRsf-1 mutant behaved as a dominant suppressor of position effect variegation. In dRsf-1 mutant, the levels of histone H3K9 dimethylation and histone H2A variant H2Av were significantly reduced in an euchromatic region juxtaposed with heterochromatin. Furthermore, using both genetic and biochemical approaches, we demonstrate that dRsf-1 interacts with H2Av and the H2Av-exchanging machinery Tip60 complex. These results suggest that RSF contributes to histone H2Av replacement in the pathway of silent chromatin formation.
  In the eukaryotic nucleus, DNA is packaged as a chemically stable nucleoprotein called chromatin. The fundamental unit of chromatin is a nucleosome, which is made up of 146 bp of DNA wrapped around an octamer of histone proteins H2A, H2B, H3 and H4 [1]. Therefore, every nuclear process that requires access to DNA proceeds in the context of chromatin. This makes possible to regulate the process through the chromatin structure. To stabilize or overcome the inhibitory effect of chromatin, some mechanisms that alter the chromatin structure are necessary. One of the mechanisms for modulation of the chromatin structure is modification of histones by acetylation, phosphorylation, methylation, ubiquitination, or ADP-ribosylation [2], [3]. Recently, histone variants have been also shown to be important for modulating chromatin status [4]. The majority of variants that have been reported to date correspond to two types of histones, H2A and H3. Many of the H2A variants are involved in the formation of higher-order chromatin structure [5]. H2A. Z, one of the best-studied H2A variants, is essential for establishing proper chromatin structure in many organisms [6]. For example, mammalian H2A. Z contributes to unique structure of centromere [7] and is essential to maintain the genome integrity [8]. In addition to the function of H2A. Z in constitutive heterochromatin, H2A. Z also has a role for formation of facultative heterochromatin [9], [10]. Drosophila melanogaster has a single H2A. Z variant, H2Av that comprises 5–10% of cellular H2A protein [11]. As mammalian H2A. Z, H2Av nonrandomly localizes to heterochromatin regions and many euchromatin regions on polytene chromosomes [12], A recent study has demonstrated that chromatin in Drosophila H2Av mutants exhibits reduced H3 lysine 9 (H3K9) methylation and reduced HP1 binding and Pc binding [13], suggesting an essential role of H2Av for silent chromatin formation in Drosophila. Another important modulator of chromatin regulation is ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling, which alters the chromatin structure or positioning of nucleosomes. ISWI is one of the highly conserved and well-characterized ATPase subunits [14], [15]. In Drosophila, ISWI forms several kinds of chromatin remodeling complexes: ACF (ATP-utilizing chromatin assembly and remodeling factor) [16], CHRAC (chromatin accessibility complexes) [17], and NURF (nucleosome remodeling factor) [15]. In vitro assays have shown that these ISWI complexes facilitate the sliding of histone octamers on DNA [18]–[20]. The Remodeling and Spacing Factor (RSF) complex has been purified from human cells [21], and consists of two subunits: Rsf-1 and SNF2H, a human counterpart of Drosophila ISWI. RSF possesses not only the chromatin remodeling activity, but also chromatin assembly activity in vitro. Rsf-1 assembles nucleosomes randomly with its histone chaperone activity. The resulting nucleosomes are then redistributed into a periodic array by the ATP-utilizing nucleosome mobilization factor SNF2H [22]. No other single factor can execute the same activities as RSF. While the biochemical property of RSF has been investigated in vitro, the in vivo function of the factor remains elusive. We investigated the biological function of RSF by using a genetically amenable organism D. melanogaster. Because the catalytic subunit ISWI is shared with other remodeling factors, we focused on the Rsf-1 subunit. The Drosophila genome contains one candidate gene CG8677 (Drosophila Rsf-1: dRsf-1) [23], [24]. We show here physical interactions between dRsf-1 and ISWI suggesting that they function together as an RSF complex in vivo. A dRsf-1 mutation dominantly suppresses position effect variegation (PEV). These results suggest that dRsf-1 functions in transcriptionally silent chromatin formation. Furthermore, we show physical and functional interactions of dRsf-1 with H2Av and the H2Av-exchanging factor Tip60 complex. Based on these findings, we propose that RSF plays a role in histone H2Av replacement, thereby contributing to the formation of silent chromatin structure.
  The Drosophila genome contains a single candidate for human Rsf-1/HBXAP counterpart gene CG8677 [23], [24]. The full-length cDNA of CG8677 encodes a 2759 amino-acid protein, with the predicted molecular mass of 304 kDa. dRsf-1 protein contains a HBXAP conserved domain (XCD) at the N-terminus, and a plant homology domain (PHD) in the middle of the molecule (Figure 1A). While the homology between human Rsf-1 and CG8677 gene product is restricted to XCD and PHD, these domains are found in the same order and CG8677 is a sole gene encoding both these domains highly homologous to those in human Rsf-1 (Figure S1). Moreover, CG8677 product is an acidic protein (pl 5. 1) sharing several long stretches of acidic amino acids with human Rsf-1. Based on these data, we considered CG8677 as Drosophila Rsf-1 (dRsf-1). A search for Rsf-1 homologs in other species revealed candidate genes in mouse, zebra fish, and sea urchin [25], but not in yeast and plants (data not shown). To gain insight into dRsf-1 cellular function, we raised antibodies against a region unique to the dRsf-1 protein (278 amino acid residues underlined in Figure 1A, bottom line). The affinity-purified antibodies specifically recognized approximately 300-kDa dRsf-1 proteins from whole nuclei of Drosophila embryos by western blotting (Figure 1B). Using the antibodies against dRsf-1, we first analyzed the localization of dRsf-1 in early Drosophila embryos and found that dRsf-1 is expressed ubiquitously (data not shown). During interphase, dRsf-1 localized to nuclei and diffused in the cytoplasm during metaphase (Figure 1C). A similar behavior has been reported for human Rsf-1 during cell division [23]. To directly visualize dRsf-1 localization on chromatin, we examined its distribution on salivary gland polytene chromosomes. We observed that dRsf-1 localizes to multiple sites along the polytene chromosomes (Figure 2A). The vast majority of these sites reside in interbands, regions of less condensed DNA stained lightly with DAPI (Figure 2D, 2F, and 2J). We were unable to detect dRsf-1 signals at the heterochromatic chromocenter (Figure 2D). To analyze a potential role of dRsf-1 in gene expression, we compared its distribution on polytene chromosomes with that of RNA polymerase ll (Pol ll). We used an antibody against the phosphorylated Ser5 of the Pol ll CTD (Figure 2B). The Ser5-phosphorylated Pol ll is present preferentially in promoter proximal regions and represents a form engaged in transcription [26]. dRsf-1 and Ser5-phosphorylated Pol ll showed predominantly non-overlapping distributions (Figure 2E, 2H, and 2I). These observations demonstrate that dRsf-1 localizes to non-transcribed regions of euchromatin. Human Rsf-1 forms the RSF complex with ISWI-type ATPase SNF2H [21]–[23]. Both subunits are essential for the activities of the complex in vitro [23]. To investigate whether the RSF complex is conserved in Drosophila, we first made co-immunoprecipitation analyses using embryonic nuclear extracts. ISWI proteins were co-immunoprecipitated with anti-dRsf-1 antibodies, but not with control IgG (Figure 3A, left panel). Reciprocally, we verified that dRsf-1 was co-immunoprecipitated with anti-ISWI antibodies (Figure 3A, right panel). Both types of the co-immunoprecipitation were observed in the presence of 80 µg/ml ethidium bromide, suggesting that the interaction between dRsf-1 and ISWI is not mediated through nucleic acids (Figure S2). Quantification of the band intensities indicated that almost all dRsf-1 interacts with ISWI in the embryonic nuclear extracts. Next, we fractionated an embryonic nuclear extract by gel filtration through Superose-6 and analyzed the fractions for the presence of dRsf-1 and ISWI by western blotting. dRsf-1 was eluted in a single peak at about 1MDa (Figure 3B). The majority of ISWI peaked around 670 KDa as previous report [18], which may correspond to ACF/CHRAC-containing fraction [17]. However, approximately 20% of ISWI was eluted wit the dRsf-1 peak. To test if dRsf-1 forms a complex with ISWI, we pooled the dRsf-1 peak fractions (No. 18–19), and again fractionated it by gel filtration through Superose-6. This process eliminated the ACF/CHRAC complex containing ISWI, and we observed that dRsf-1 and ISWI were eluted in a single peak. Finally we compared the distribution of dRsf-1 with that of ISWI on polytene chromosomes (Figure 3C). The distribution of dRsf-1 was mostly coincident with that of ISWI in euchromatic regions. Consistent with our co-immunoprecipitation data and the fact that ISWI is also included in other complexes, not all signals of ISWI colocalized with the dRsf-1 signals on polytene chromosomes. Indeed, we observed localization of ISWI but not dRsf-1 on the centromeric heterochromatin and the 4th chromosome region (Arrow heads C and 4 in Figure 3B, respectively). These biochemical and cytological data indicate that ISWI and dRsf-1 work on chromatin as an RSF complex and also suggest that at least some ISWI-containing complexes are present on chromatin independently. dRsf-1 is mapped to the cytological interval 39B3-4 in the left arm of chromosome 2. The fly line I (2) KG02636 carries a P-element P{SUPor-P} in the first intron of the dRsf-1 gene (Figure 4A). Homozygous I (2) KG02636 animals are viable and the insertion does not affect the dRsf-1 transcription (data not shown). To assess the in vivo function of dRsf-1, we generated dRsf-1 deletions by imprecise excision of the P-element in I (2) KG02636. Sequence analysis of the resulting allele, Df (2L) dRsf-13602 (dRsf-13602), confirmed an 876-bp deletion that eliminates the translational initiation codon, the first exon and a part of the first intron of dRsf-1 gene (Figure 4A). dRsf-1 protein was not detectable in homozygous dRsf-13602 embryos by western blotting (Figure 4B). No staining with anti-dRsf-1 antibodies was observed on polytene chromosomes of mutant larvae (Figure 4D) and the nuclei of early embryos from the mutant flies (Figure 4E). From these data, dRsf-13602 appears to be a null allele of dRsf-1. Although evolutionary conservation of Rsf-1 implies a critical role in development, almost all dRsf-13602 homozygous flies are viable. Only about 10% of the homozygous dRsf-13602 flies died in the pupal stage. We observed a melanotic tumor phenotype in these animals (data not shown). The loss of dRsf-1 does not affect the gross appearance of polytene chromosomes (Figure 4D) and we were unable to observe any change in the nucleosome repeat length of bulk chromatin derived from dRsf-13602 embryos compared with wild type embryos (Figure 4C). Consistent with our observations, recent study has also reported that expression of dominant-negative ISWI protein did not affect the nucleosome spacing and sensitivity to micrococcal nuclease digestion [27]. As the immunofluorecence analysis shows that dRsf-1 localizes on the limited regions on chromatin (Figure 2A), it may be difficult to observe the effect of dRsf-1 mutation on the bulk chromatin structure. Homozygous dRsf-13602 adult flies are fertile and phenotypically normal. These results indicate that dRsf-1 is not essential for viability and fertility. We used homozygous dRsf-13602 flies in subsequent experiments. Judging from the in vitro activities of human RSF, we expected that dRsf-1 should play a role in the regulation of chromatin structure in vivo. To test this possibility, we examined the effect of the dRsf-1 mutant allele, dRsf-13602, on PEV. A series of mutations that suppress or enhance PEV have been identified so far, and most of the corresponding genes have been shown to be involved in the regulation of chromatin structure [28], [29]. The In (1) wm4h allele is caused by an inversion that positions the white gene next to the centromeric heterochromatin of the X chromosome [30], [31]. This leads to a phenotype in which the eye color is a mosaic of red and white. As shown in Figure 5A, the variegation was significantly suppressed in animals heterozygous for the dRsf-13602 allele, with red-pigmented regions significantly increased compared to In (1) wm4h alone (Figure 5A and 5B). Moreover, the variegation was suppressed more strongly in homozygous dRsf-13602 animals; with most regions of their eyes exhibiting red pigmentation (Figure 5A, right panel). Essentially the same results were also observed in flies doubly heterozygous for dRsf-13602 and the deficiency Df (2L) TW1 or Df (2L) DS6, which both lack the dRsf-1 gene region (Figure S3). Quantitative analyses revealed that the amounts of the red pigment were increased ∼2-fold and 6-fold in the dRsf-13602 heterozygous and homozygous flies, respectively (Figure 5B). Moreover, reverse transcription (RT) -PCR analysis revealed that the amounts of white transcripts from wm4h allele, but not from w+ were actually increased in the dRsf-13602 homozygous flies (Figure 5C). This shows that dRsf-1 does not directly regulate the transcription of white gene on the normal chromosomal position. These data demonstrate that dRsf-13602 allele is a dominant suppressor of PEV and indicate that dRsf-1 is involved in heterochromatin-induced silent chromatin formation. Recent studies have shown that the histone H2A variant H2Av forms a sequential pathway for repressive chromatin assembly [13]. To test whether dRsf-1 is involved in this pathway, we tested for a functional interaction between RSF and H2Av. While both dRsf-13602 and H2Av810 heterozygous mutants suppressed PEV weakly (Figure 6A) [13], quantification of the red eye pigment showed a synergistic increase in the double heterozygotes compared to each single heterozygote (Figure 6A). The observed genetic interaction between dRsf-1 and H2Av suggests a role for RSF in the H2Av-mediated pathway of silent chromatin formation. How is RSF involved in the assembly of silent chromatin? To gain clues about this question, we examined the chromatin status in the dRsf-13602 mutant by chromatin-immunoprecipitation (ChIP). Our major focus was on the rearranged white regions in wm4h. In addition, we analyzed an rDNA coding sequence in the β-heterochromatin [32], [33] and an actively transcribed Act5C region as controls. First, we analyzed histone H3K9 methylation that is a typical mark of the heterochromatin region. H3K9 methylation has been detected in the rearranged white region of wm4 flies [34], [35]. We observed that the level of H3K9 di-methylation (dmH3K9) was clearly reduced by 30∼60% in the dRsf-13602 mutant flies as compared with dRsf-1 wild type, while the level in the rDNA region was not changed significantly between the mutant and wild type (Figure 6B, upper graph). The level of dmH3K9 was extremely low and also was not changed in the Act5C coding region. Next, we investigated the upstream event of H3K9 methylation. The recruitment of the H2Av has been shown to be a necessary step prior to H3K9 methylation [13]. This led us to do the ChIP analysis using anti-H2Av antibodies. Notably we observed a significant decrease in the levels of H2Av around the rearranged white region in the dRsf-13602 mutant flies, while the levels of H2Av did not decrease in the rDNA and the actively transcribed Act5C regions (Figure 6B, lower graph). There is no significant difference in the mRNA levels of H2Av in the dRsf-13602 mutant flies compared with the control flies (Figure S4), indicating that the observed decrease is not due to reduced expression of H2Av in dRsf-13602 mutant flies. Furthermore, the levels of H2A increased in the region (region “A” in Figure 6B) that showed an H2Av decrease (Figure 6C), indicating that the observed decrease in H2Av is due to less frequent replacement of H2A by H2Av. These results of ChIP analyses indicate that RSF contributes to H2Av incorporation and also suggest that RSF is not directly involved in the formation of heterochromatin but necessary for heterochromatin spreading into neighboring regions. To address how RSF governs H2Av incorporation, we analyzed interaction between RSF and H2Av using soluble nuclear extracts from embryos. However, we were unable to detect co-immunoprecipitation of H2Av with RSF. It is possible that RSF interacts with H2Av on chromatin but not in the soluble nuclear extract. Therefore, we examined the association of dRsf-1 with chromatin containing H2Av. Nuclei from the Drosophila embryos were digested with micrococcal nuclease to yield predominantly mono-nucleosomes (Figure 7A, left panel). When the nucleosomes were immunoprecipitated with anti-dRsf-1 antibodies, H2Av proteins were co-immunoprecipitated (Figure 7A, right panel). Furthermore, the H2Av proteins were enriched in the immunoprecipitated nucleosomes compared with the bulk nucleosomes (Figure 7B). To confirm the interaction between dRsf-1 and H2Av on chromatin, we examined whether dRsf-1 colocalizes with H2Av on larval polytene chromosomes. Although the distribution of dRsf-1 was not completely coincident with that of H2Av, strong immunofluorecence signals of dRsf-1 colocalized with H2Av in multiple sites on the polytene chromosomes (Figure 7C, arrow heads). The biochemical and cytological interactions between dRsf-1 and H2Av suggest that RSF functions at (or immediately upstream of) H2Av incorporation rather than playing an indirect role through other step (s). In yeast, the ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complex SWR1 has been reported to exchange histone H2A with H2A. Z [36]. A Drosophila counterpart of the yeast SWR1 complex is the Tip60 complex that consists of multisubunits including Tip60, Domino, dMRG15 and dReptin, and can exchange phospho-H2Av with an unmodified H2Av [37]. Recent report has shown that the Tip60 complex can promote the generation of silent chromatin [38]. It is possible that RSF is functionally related to the Tip60 complex. To test the possibility, we first analyzed the distribution of dRsf-1 and Domino, a Drosophila counterpart of yeast Swr1 [37], [39], on polytene chromosomes. As shown in Figure 8A, these proteins colocalize on many loci along the polytene chromosomes. While the signals were not completely coincident, it is most likely due to the multifunction of Domino; some of Domino is also involved in transcriptional activation [40]. We then analyzed physical interaction between RSF and Domino by immunoprecipitation assays using embryonic nuclear extracts. Domino proteins were co-immunoprecipitated with anti-dRsf-1 antibodies (Figure 8B). In a reciprocal test, dRsf-1 and ISWI proteins were co-immunoprecipitated with anti-Domino antibodies (Figure 8B). We also observed co-immunoprecipitation of other Tip60 complex components, E (Pc), dTip60 and dMRG15, with dRsf-1 (Figure 8B). Finally we analyzed a functional interaction between dRsf-1 and dReptin, a core subunit of the Tip60 complex. While both dRsf-13602 and dReptin heterozygous mutants suppressed PEV (Figure 8C) [38], their double heterozygotes showed a synergistic effect on the suppression of PEV (Figure 8C). This effect is not due to decreased expression of dReptin in the Rsf-1 mutant (Figure S4). Taken together these data suggest that RSF contributes to exchange of histone H2Av through association with the Tip60 complex.
  Several kinds of ISWI-containing complexes have been shown in Drosophila. NURF, ACF and CHRAC have been identified using in vitro assays for nucleosome remodeling activities in embryonic extracts of Drosophila [15]–[17]. Toutatis (Drosophila ortholog of human TIP-5) ISWI complex has been reported to positively regulate gene activities [41]. We have herein identified another ISWI chromatin remodeling complex, RSF, in Drosophila. All of dRsf-1, nurf301 and Acf1 mutations suppress PEV (this study) [42], [43]. The nurf301 mutation might suppress PEV due to the up-regulation of the genes on the X chromosome [44]. The changes in bulk chromatin repeat length in the Acf1 mutant flies could be ascribed to a defect in the incorporation of histone H1 [45], which suggests a function for ACF in heterochromatic regions. However, in dRsf-13602 mutant flies, we were unable to detect an abnormally decondensed X-chromosome as is observed in the nurf301 mutant flies [44], nor a nucleosome spacing defect as has been detected in Acf1 mutant flies [42]. Instead, the level of histone H2Av on chromatin is reduced in the dRsf-13602 mutant and our biochemical and genetic studies show that dRsf-1 contributes to silent chromatin formation coincident with histone H2Av incorporation in euchromatin regions. Judging from these observations, the effect of each mutation on PEV appears to come from different mechanisms. Various types of ISWI complex seem to exist independently on chromatin and execute different functions in vivo. PEV is thought to be caused by spreading of the heterochromatic state into neighboring regions of euchromatin [46]. While products of some Su (var) genes are thought to localize and function on heterochromatin regions, proteins encoded by other Su (var) genes such as dRsf-1 (this study), E (Pc) [47], Z4 [48] and so on do not localize to heterochromatin regions. A recent study has reported that the mutation of dG9a, the Drosophila ortholog of euchromatic H3K9 methyltransferase G9a, also suppresses PEV [49]. Because, in Drosophila, localization of such proteins is usually analyzed on polytene chromosomes in the post mitotic stage, one possibility is that they bind to heterochromatin regions transiently in cell cycle progression or during an early developmental stage. For example, Su (var) 3-3, a Drosophila homolog of LSD1 has been reported to localize on heterochromatin region during early embryonic stages and to play an essential role in establishment of heterochromatin [35]. However, we were unable to detect the dRsf-1 protein on heterochromatin regions during cell cycle progression or during early embryonic stages (data not shown). Thus, a more plausible interpretation of PEV suppression in the dRsf-1 mutant is that dRsf-1 activities on a juxtaposed euchromatic region can allow the spreading of centromeric heterochromatin in the dRsf-1+ background. We speculate that PEV could occur through not only the invasion of heterochromatin, but also the guidance of centromeric heterochromatin spreading from a potential facultative heterochromatin region. Indeed, the formation of constitutive heterochromatin and facultative heterochromatin share common molecular mechanisms [50]. When the potential facultative heterochromatin region becomes juxtaposed with the constitutive heterochromatin region, the heterochromatic state might be easily spread into the neighboring region. We found that the level of H2Av on chromatin was reduced in dRsf-1 mutant flies (Figure 6). We also observed the physical and functional interactions of RSF with H2Av and the H2Av-exchanging factor Tip60 complex (Figures 7 and 8). These findings raise an intriguing possibility that RSF directs local H2Av replacement through its association with the Tip60 complex during the silent chromatin formation. Our future study should address whether the genetic interaction between dRsf-1 and Tip60 complex component dReptin results in a defect in H2Av deposition at the white locus close to heterochromatin. Although the level of H2Av on chromatin was reduced in dRsf-1 mutant, we could still detect a residual level of H2Av, suggesting that some factor other than RSF may also contribute to the step. The presence of such factor may also explain our observation that the gross distribution of Domino along polytene chromosomes was not altered in the dRsf-1 mutant (unpublished observation). Loss of both RSF and the putative factor may be required to cause a dramatic change in the localization of Domino. The presence of other factor may also explain why H2Av is essential for fly development [51] but dRsf-1 is not. Furthermore, while dRsf-1 is absent from the chromocenter (Figure 2D), H2Av has been reported to be a component of centromeric chromatin [12]. Therefore, another remodeling complex or mechanisms must be responsible for the deposition of H2Av at constitutive heterochromatin. Interestingly, H2A. Z, the H2Av ortholog in other organisms, has been reported to affect chromatin condensation in vitro [52]. The acidic patch of H2A. Z has been thought to allow strong interaction with N-terminal tail of H4 from a neighboring nucleosome [53]. The nucleosome arrays formed by RSF may create a platform for incorporation of H2Av and also allow the precisely arranged nucleosome-nucleosome interactions through H2Av. As incorporation of yeast H2A. Z, Htz1, into nucleosomes inhibits chromatin remodeling activities [54], it may be necessary to remodel the basal nucleosome array before incorporation of h2Av. The resulting nucleosome array may easily promote HP1-mediated higher-order chromatin folding as observed for H2A. Z-containing nucleosome array [52], and facilitate H3K9 methylation. Based on our findings and the above information, we propose the following pathway of condensed silent chromatin formation (Figure 8D): First RSF forms nucleosome arrays and induces exchange of H2A for H2Av through association with the Tip60 complex. This allows further steps of silent chromatin formation, such as histone H3K9 methylation and HP1 binding, to proceed or proceed more efficiently, which ultimately lead to chromatin compaction.
  Flies were raised on a standard agar/cornmeal/yeast medium. Stocks and crosses were maintained at 25°C. The CG8677KG02636 and In (1) wm4h flies were obtained from Bloomington Stock Center. The His2Av810/TM3 were from Drosophila Genetic Resource Center (DGRC). The dReptin/TM3 was a gift from Mattias Mannervik. The CG8677KG02636 insertion line contains a P{SUPor-P} transposon within the first intron of dRsf-1. The transposon was mobilized in the presence of the P transposase Δ2–3. Total of about 1000 lines were analyzed by PCR to detect deletion across the dRsf-1 locus. To measure eye pigmentation, 10 male heads (24 hours post eclosion) from each line were homogenized in 200 µl 1∶1 mixture of chloroform/0. 1% ammonium hydroxide. The homogenates were centrifuged and removed 100 µl of the upper aqueous layer to measure absorbency at 480nm [55]. Four or three independent samples were measured for each line. The DNA fragment encoding amino acid residues 1443–1719 of dRsf-1 polypeptide was cloned into a pET28a vector (Novagene). The protein fragments expressed in E. coli BL21 (DE3) RIL at 37°C were purified by an affinity chromatography on the Ni-NTA resin (Sigma) according to the manufacture' s protocol and used to generate polyclonal antibodies in rabbits. Crude antiserum was purified by an affinity chromatography using the antigen polypeptides coupled to CNBr-activated Sepharose 4B (Amersham Biosciences). All immunological procedures were performed with the affinity purified anti-dRsf-1 antibodies. Western blot analyses were performed using a standard protocol. The nuclei were prepared from embryos (collected 10–22 hours after egg laying: AEL) as described previously [56]. Nuclear proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to a PVDF membrane (Roche), probed with the rabbit antibodies against dRsf-1, ISWI, H2Av, and Domino [12], [39], [57], followed by horseradish peroxidase-linked anti-rabbit IgG and detected using SuperSignal (Pierce). Salivary gland chromosomes from third instar larvae were fixed for 2 minutes in 45% acetic acid/1. 85% formaldehyde and stained as descried previously [58]. The anti-dRsf-1 antibodies were used at a 1/100 dilution. Other antibodies used in this study include rabbit antibodies against ISWI, mouse antibody against Pol IIoser5 (Covance) and rabbit antibodies against H2Av [12] and rat antibodies against Domino [37]. Secondary antibodies used were Alexa fluor™ 488 anti-rabbit IgG (Molecular Probes), Cy3 anti-mouse IgM and Cy3 anti-rat IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch). For double staining, HiLyte Fluor™ 488 Dye and HiLyte Fluor™ 555 Dye (ANASPEC) were conjugated to anti-dRsf-1 and anti-ISWI or anti-H2Av antibodies, respectively. The labeling was done according to the manufacturer' s protocol. Finally, the samples were mounted using a VECTASHIELD mounting medium containing DAPI (Vector Laboratories). The nuclei were extracted for 30 minutes in a nuclear extraction buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH7. 9,1. 5 mM MgCl2. 0. 2 mM EDTA, 0. 2 mM EGTA, 400 mM NaCl, 25% glycerol) in the presence of a protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma). Antibodies were coupled to Protein-G Agarose (Upatate) for 6 hours and incubated with the nuclear extracts containing approximately 200 µg of proteins in an immunoprecipitation buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH7. 9,0. 5 mM EDTA, 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol) for 3 hours at 4°C. Subsequently beads were washed five times with a wash buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH7. 9,0. 5 mM EDTA, 150 mM NaCl, 0. 01% NP-40,10% glycerol). Native chromatin samples were prepared as described [59] from Drosophila embryonic nuclei. Antibodies were coupled to Protein-G Agarose (Upstate) and the beads were washed five times with wash buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH7. 9,0. 5 mM EDTA, 300 mM NaCl, 0. 05% NP-40,10% glycerol). Bound proteins were eluted with an SDS-sample buffer (0. 1 M Tris-HCl, pH6. 8,5% SDS, 0. 1 M DTT, 20% glycerol), and resolved by SDS-PAGE and detected on Western blots. For gel filtration, nuclear extract proteins (2 mg) were fractionated on a Superose 6 HR 10/30 FPLC column (GE) equilibrated with high salt-extraction buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH7. 9,0. 5 mM EDTA, 0. 5 mM EGTA, 500 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol). Fractions (0. 5 ml) were collected and analyzed by western blotting. Before the second gel filtration, dRsf-1-containing fractions (No. 18–20) were pooled and concentrated by Amicon Ultra (MILLIPORE). ChIP assays were performed as described [30]. Anti-histone H3 (GeneTex), anti-histone H2Av [12], anti-histone H2A [12] and anti-histone H3K9 dimethyl (Upstate) antibodies were used for ChIP assays. The precipitated DNA fragments were amplified by PCR using Blend Taq (TOYOBO). The primer pairs were used to amplify ∼100-base pair fragments are described in Table S1. The PCR products were resolved by gel electrophoresis, stained with SYBR green (Molecular Probes), and analyzed by a LAS-1000 luminescent image analyzer (FUJIFILM). Averages and SDs (standard deviations) from at least three independent experiments are shown in the figures. Total RNA was isolated using Sepazol RNA1 (Nakarai) from 50 mg of mixed-stage embryos (10–22 h AEL). The RNA was then treated with RNase-free DNase l (TaKaRa). cDNA was synthesized using a 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit for RT-PCR (Roche) according to the manufacturer' s protocol. The cDNA was amplified by PCR and analyzed as described [34]. Chromatin structure was examined by analyzing the pattern of the products partially digested with MNase. MNase assays were carried out as described [60]. DNA samples were size separated on 2% TAE agarose gel, and stained with SYBR green (Molecular Probes), and analyzed by the LAS-1000 luminescent image analyzer (FUJIFILM).
summary: As DNA is packaged into chromatin in the nucleus, every DNA transaction requires alteration of the chromatin structure. RSF, a heterodimer of Rsf-1 and ISWI/SNF2H, is a unique chromatin remodeling factor that can assemble regularly spaced nucleosome arrays without the aid of histone chaperons, but its biological function is not clear. Using Drosophila melanogaster as a model organism, we investigated the in vivo role of RSF in gene expression. The loss of RSF function reduces the levels of histone variant H2Av and histone H3-K9 methylation, and suppresses silencing of transcription in an euchromatic region neighboring the centromeric heterochromatin. We also observed that Rsf-1 interacts with histone H2Av and the H2Av-exchanging machinery Tip60 complex. Based on these findings, we propose that RSF plays a role in silent chromatin formation by promoting histone H2Av replacement.
keywords: developmental biology/molecular development
  genetics and genomics/epigenetics
  molecular biology/histone modification
  molecular biology/chromatin structure
title: RSF Governs Silent Chromatin Formation via Histone H2Av Replacement