article: Microdomains that emerge from spatially constricted spread of biochemical signaling components play a central role in several neuronal computations. Although dendrites, endowed with several voltage-gated ion channels, form a prominent structural substrate for microdomain physiology, it is not known if these channels regulate the spatiotemporal spread of signaling microdomains. Here, we employed a multiscale, morphologically realistic, conductance-based model of the hippocampal pyramidal neuron that accounted for experimental details of electrical and calcium-dependent biochemical signaling. We activated synaptic N-Methyl-d-Aspartate receptors through theta-burst stimulation (TBS) or pairing (TBP) and assessed microdomain propagation along a signaling pathway that included calmodulin, calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) and protein phosphatase 1. We found that the spatiotemporal spread of the TBS-evoked microdomain in phosphorylated CaMKII (pCaMKII) was amplified in comparison to that of the corresponding calcium microdomain. Next, we assessed the role of two dendritically expressed inactivating channels, one restorative (A-type potassium) and another regenerative (T-type calcium), by systematically varying their conductances. Whereas A-type potassium channels suppressed the spread of pCaMKII microdomains by altering the voltage response to TBS, T-type calcium channels enhanced this spread by modulating TBS-induced calcium influx without changing the voltage. Finally, we explored cross-dependencies of these channels with other model components, and demonstrated the heavy mutual interdependence of several biophysical and biochemical properties in regulating microdomains and their spread. Our conclusions unveil a pivotal role for dendritic voltage-gated ion channels in actively amplifying or suppressing biochemical signals and their spatiotemporal spread, with critical implications for clustered synaptic plasticity, robust information transfer and efficient neural coding.
  Microdomains that emerge from spatially constricted spread of biochemical signaling components play a central role in defining several neuronal computations, including compartmentalization of neuronal plasticity and localized targeting of membrane components [1–10]. Theoretical and experimental studies have demonstrated that the spread of these microdomains are regulated by several biophysical and biochemical parameters. These parameters include the concentrations, localization profiles, binding and diffusion constants of the signaling components that are part of the signaling network, the morphological structure of the compartment, network topologies and feedback motifs [1–5,8, 11]. Most such studies have considered neuronal dendrites, which form the prominent structural substrate for microdomain spread and physiology, to be passive structures that lack active dendritic conductances. Neuronal electrical signaling and physiology, however, is defined by the presence and plasticity of voltage-gated ion channel conductances, some of which are present at higher densities in the dendrites than at the cell body [9,12–24]. Additionally, consequent to their ability to significantly alter calcium influx into neuronal compartments, these active dendritic conductances are well established as critical regulators of synaptic plasticity profiles [12–14,19,25–35]. Given such pivotal role of active dendrites in determining neuronal physiology and plasticity, the question on whether active dendritic conductances regulate the spatiotemporal spread of signaling microdomains is important and has not been addressed. To address this question, we employed a multiscale, multicompartmental, morphologically realistic, conductance-based model that accounted for the biophysics of electrical signaling [16–18,36,37] and the biochemistry of calcium handling [25,26,38–40] and downstream enzymatic signaling in a hippocampal pyramidal neuron. We chose the calcium–calmodulin–calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) –protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) signaling pathway owing to its critical importance to several forms of neuronal plasticity [41–52], and employed physiologically relevant theta-burst stimulation (TBS) or theta-burst pairing (TBP) protocol [12,20,53–58] to initiate a calcium microdomain through N-Methyl-d-Aspartate receptor (NMDAR) activation at a synapse. We studied the spatiotemporal spread of calcium and other downstream microdomains in a dendritic segment compartmentalized to 2000 compartments, each spanning ~97-nm of length. Using this setup, we assessed the role of two dendritically expressed inactivating conductances [16,18]—one restorative (A-type K+) and another regenerative (T-type Ca2+) —and showed that they respectively suppress and enhance the spread of phosphorylated CaMKII through different mechanisms. We also assessed the cross-dependencies of these two channels with other model components, and demonstrated the heavy mutual interdependence of several biophysical and biochemical properties in regulating microdomains and their spread. Our results provide compelling evidence for a critical role of active dendrites in regulating the spatiotemporal spread of signaling microdomains. These conclusions call for a marked rethink of the complexities associated with subcellular signaling networks, with future experiments focusing on the role of voltage-gated ion channels in tuning location-dependent signaling specificity and spread, in regulating robust information transfer and efficient encoding of afferent inputs in signaling networks, in regulating clustered plasticity of spatially-adjacent synapses on dendritic branches, and in behavioral state- and activity-dependent changes in such signal propagation.
  To accommodate the steep spatial decay of calcium, and the consequent requirement for finer spatial discretization when compared to discretization required for electrical simulations [63], we followed the established approach of employing a single oblique dendrite to assess signaling microdomains [8]. Although the analyses associated with signaling microdomains (Fig 2A) was performed in this oblique dendrite, its presence as part of the morphologically realistic electrical model ensured that the branching profiles and channel conductances required for maintaining excitability properties match their experimental counterparts. To accommodate fine spatial discretization, the oblique (of total length 193 μm) highlighted in Fig 2A was compartmentalized to 2000 compartments (making each compartment size to be around 97 nm). With the rest of the somatodendritic arbor discretized to accommodate electrical length constants, this spatial discretization procedure resulted in a total number of 2864 compartments in the entire neuronal structure. We placed a single synapse containing both AMPA and NMDA receptors, whose kinetics and voltage-dependence properties (of NMDA receptors) were derived from electrophysiological measurements, at the center of this 100-μm region on the oblique. The AMPAR density was set such that the somatic unitary EPSP amplitude was ~0. 2 mV, to match with experimental observations [64]. Consistent with our motivations of understanding signaling microdomains that are relevant to plasticity induction in the hippocampus, we stimulated this synapse with the well-established theta burst stimulation (TBS; Fig 2A) protocol that induces synaptic plasticity in hippocampal neurons [53]. As expected, the voltage traces obtained with this stimulation resulted in temporally summating excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) that resulted in local dendritic, but not axosomatic spikes (Fig 2A). Although the recorded voltage traces were not very different across a span of 3 μm on either side of the synapse (Fig 2B), the calcium concentration (consequent to influx through NMDARs at the synapse) displayed sharp attenuation with distance, thereby establishing the calcium microdomain induced by TBS (Fig 2C and 2D). Given the reaction-diffusion framework employed here (Fig 1E), this calcium microdomain propagated along the signaling network, manifesting as localized increases in the concentration of calcium-bound calmodulin, activated and phosphorylated CaMKII (pCaMKII) and as localized reductions in the concentrations of unbound calmodulin and non-activated CaMKII (Fig 2E–2G). As would be expected from the binding kinetics of the reactions, and especially by the autophosphorylation of CaMKII, there was an increase in the spatiotemporal spread of the microdomain associated with pCaMKII compared to that of calcium (compare Fig 2D with Fig 2F; see Fig 2G). These results quantitatively demonstrate that TBS induces localized calcium influx, which, through propagation along an established signaling pathway, results in a microdomain of pCaMKII with a spread larger than that of the calcium microdomain [41,43,47]. In order to look at how several key parameters of the model affect the micorodomain spatiotemporal kinetics, we performed sensitivity analyses involving different values of calcium diffusion constant (DCa), total concentrations of calmodulin ([CaM]T) and CaMKII ([CaMKII]T). We observed no significant change in the electrical response to TBS for different values assigned to each of these three parameters (Fig 3A), which was expected because all these parameters are involved in the signaling pathway downstream of electrical responses. However, the spatiotemporal dynamics of downstream signaling microdomains were sensitive to these parametric values (Fig 3A). Specifically, increase in DCa expectedly enhanced the spatial spread, also resulting in a reduction in peak calcium concentration (Fig 3A and 3B). Consequent to the enhanced spatial spread of calcium, the pCaMKII microdomains showed an enhanced spread, although there was little increase in peak [pCaMKII]max (Fig 3A and 3B). Upon increase in [CaM]T, as more free calcium was now bound to CaM, there was a small reduction in the peak values of [Ca]cmax (Fig 3A and 3B). As a direct consequence of the larger availability of calcium-bound calmodulin, there was a significant increase in the peak values of [pCaMKII] and in the spread of pCaMKII (Fig 3A and 3B). Varying the [CaMKII]T, however, did not alter the calcium or pCaMKII dynamics significantly across the tested range (Fig 3A and 3B). These results demonstrated that within the specific parametric configurations, the spatiotemporal evolution of pCaMKII was more sensitive to the concentration of calmodulin than on calcium diffusion or on total CaMKII concentration. The presence and plasticity of A-type potassium (KA) channels in hippocampal neuronal dendrites and their roles in regulating dendritic excitability and synaptic plasticity profiles are well established [16,20–22,25–27,29,30,65–68]. Does the presence of or plasticity in KA channels in hippocampal dendrites alter the spread of microdomains in plasticity-inducing enzymes? To address this question, we performed the simulations described in Fig 2 with different densities of KA channels in the oblique specified in Fig 2A (see S1 Table for a figure-wise catalog of oblique parameters). As would be expected from the ability of KA channels to regulate synaptic and action potential amplitudes [16], we found that the voltage response to TBS was lower when the density of KA channels was increased (Fig 4A, 4D and 4E). This difference in voltage response directly translated to changes in the calcium influx through NMDARs (Fig 4B, 4D, 4F, 4H and 4I), and introduced small changes in the spread of the calcium microdomain, especially towards the terminal (Fig 4D and 4F). Strikingly, this small increase in the spread of calcium microdomain was significantly amplified with propagation along the signaling pathway (Fig 4D, 4F and 4G). Specifically, although the peak pCAMKII response was not very different across different densities of KA channels (Fig 4G and 4J), the spread of the pCaMKII microdomain showed tremendous enhancement with reduction in the density of KA channels (Fig 4G and 4K). How sensitive are our conclusions to changes in key model parameters? To answer this question, we performed sensitivity analyses to assess the impact of KA channels on pCaMKII microdomain spread with two-fold increase or decrease in several key parameters (Fig 5). Across different parametric combinations, the peak pCaMKII and its spread were consistently larger with lower values of KA channel density, thereby confirming that our conclusions were not restricted by the choice of default parametric values. The sensitivity analyses also demonstrated that the spread of microdomains was critically reliant on several parameters [8], pointing towards robustness of microdomain spread through degeneracy involving several biochemical and biophysical components [8,69]. Specifically, an increase in synaptic AMPAR (Fig 5A) or NMDAR (Fig 5B) densities, or the calcium diffusion constant (Fig 5E), or the autophosphorylation rate of CaMKII (Fig 5G) or the density of R-type calcium (CaR) channels (Fig 5H) enhanced the spread of pCaMKII microdomain. In contrast, an increase in the rate associated with the plasma membrane calcium pump (Fig 5C) or the Vmax of the SERCA pump (Fig 5D) or the total capacity of the calcium buffer (Fig 5F) suppressed the pCaMKII microdomain spread. Together, these results unveil a pivotal role for dendritic A-type potassium channels in suppressing the spatiotemporal spread of microdomains in plasticity-inducing enzymes. Low voltage-activated transient T-type calcium (CaT) channels, with their predominant dendritic presence, significantly alter synaptic integration, calcium influx and dendritic spike initiation in hippocampal pyramidal neurons [18,70,71]. Although the diverse roles of CaT channels in regulating neuronal physiology and plasticity have been explored [72–76], it is not known if these channels contribute to the spread of signaling microdomains of plasticity-inducing enzymes. Therefore, as a next step, we repeated the simulations described in Fig 2 with different densities of CaT channels in the oblique specified in Fig 2A. We found that the peak local voltage response to TBS was slightly higher at terminal end. Additionally, the spatiotemporal voltage response profile was not significantly different with various densities of CaT channels (Fig 6A and 6E), although the cell entered spontaneous spiking with very high density of these channels (e. g. , Fig 6A; top panel). Although the peak calcium response was not very different with different densities of CaT channels (Fig 6B, 6F and 6H), there was a small increase in the spread of calcium microdomain with increase in CaT-channel density (Fig 6B, 6F and 6I). Despite the absence of large changes in peak voltage and calcium and pCaMKII (Fig 6C, 6G and 6J) responses at the location of the synapse, we found a significantly large increase in the spread of the pCaMKII microdomain with increase in CaT-channel density (Fig 6C, 6G and 6K). Additionally, and in contrast to the case with KA channels (Fig 4G), this increase in spread was symmetric about the synaptic location, which was a consequence of the manner in which these channels altered the microdomain spread. Specifically, whereas KA channels altered the spread of microdomains by asymmetrically modulating the voltage and calcium responses (Fig 4E and 4F), CaT channels modulated the spread through symmetric changes in calcium spread (Fig 6F) without significant changes in voltage response (Fig 6E). Next, we performed sensitivity analyses on our model to assess the impact of CaT channels on pCaMKII microdomain spread with two-fold increase or decrease in several key parameters (Fig 7). We found, across different parametric combinations, that the spread of pCaMKII was consistently larger with higher values of CaT channel density, thereby confirming that our conclusions were not restricted by the choice of default parametric values. Results from these sensitivity analyses with reference to individual parameters (Fig 7) corroborated our earlier conclusions (Fig 5) on their specific roles in altering pCaMKII microdomains, also providing further evidence for degeneracy in the spatiotemporal spread of signaling microdomains. Together, our results provide compelling evidence for a critical role for dendritic T-type calcium channels in enhancing the spatiotemporal spread of microdomains in plasticity-inducing enzymes, brought about by increases in calcium influx through these channels. As a next step in our analyses, instead of individually varying either KA (Figs 4 and 5) or CaT (Figs 6 and 7) channel densities, we varied both channels together in the oblique to different densities and repeated our simulations to assess the spread of pCaMKII microdomains (Fig 8). We performed these simulations at two different densities of CaR channels to assess the interactions between KA, CaT and CaR channels in regulating microdomains. Although results from this set of simulations were consistent with our overall conclusions that KA and CaT channels respectively suppress and enhance the pCaMKII microdomain spread, the quantitative changes observed were dependent on the other channels present in the dendritic branch. For instance, when CaR channels were absent, the impact of KA channels on pCaMKII and its spread (Fig 8A and 8C) was minimal compared to that when CaR channels were present (Fig 8B and 8D). In contrast, from the same set of figures, it may be noted that the impact of CaT channels on pCaMKII and its spread was minimal when CaR channels were absent than when they were present (especially when KA channels were absent). Together these results unveil a crucial role for active dendritic conductances in regulating the spatiotemporal spread of signaling microdomains. Additionally, in conjunction with the sensitivity analyses presented earlier (Fig 3, Fig 5, Fig 7), our conclusions underscore the heavy mutual interdependence of several biophysical and biochemical properties (that account for synaptic, intrinsic and kinetic parameters of several membrane and cytosolic signaling components) in regulating microdomains and their spatiotemporal spread along a signaling pathway. Excitatory synapses typically impinge on a dendritic spine, which has been postulated to form a biochemical compartment for calcium and downstream signaling molecules [4,51,77–87]. In order to study the effect of the presence of spine on the signaling microdomains, we incorporated a spine consisting of a head and a neck on the dendritic shaft (Fig 9A) and recorded the spread of voltage, calcium and the downstream signaling molecules in all the three sections. The AMPAR density in the spine was set such that the somatic unitary EPSP amplitude was ~0. 2 mV, to match with experimental observations [64]. This implied that the local spine and dendritic voltages were on the order of tens of mV for unitary EPSPs as well as during a TBS input (Fig 9A), which is consistent with large-amplitude spine and local-dendritic voltages recorded during unitary events [88–91]. We also noted that temporal summation during TBS elicited local dendritic spikes in the immediate vicinity of the synapse (Fig 9A), which does not propagate to the soma owing to attenuation during propagation [21]. Consistent with the role of dendritic spines as biochemical compartments, the calcium concentrations which were on the order of 10s of μM at the spine-head dropped significantly with propagation along the spine neck into the dendritic shaft. Specifically, there was almost a 100× attenuation of the calcium levels at the dendritic shaft when compared to that at the spine head (Fig 9B). Whereas the high concentrations of calcium at the spine head could be attributed to the high surface to volume ratio (SVR) of the spine compartments, the significant fall in propagating calcium was consequent to the calcium off mechanisms (i. e. , calcium pumps and buffers) expressed in the spine compartments [77,92]. As a consequence of this significant attenuation, the dendritic shaft calcium concentration for a spine-localized synapse was lower than that when the same synapse (with identical receptors and activation dynamics) was located on the dendritic shaft (Fig 9C). Despite the large reduction in the dendritic calcium concentration as a consequence of spine localization, the corresponding reduction in pCaMKII was comparatively lower (Fig 9C). Overall, despite quantitative differences, the spatiotemporal spread of all molecular species across the signaling topography within the dendritic shaft with a spine-localized synapse (Fig 9D) was qualitatively comparable to the signaling spread with a dendrite-localized synapse (Fig 2G). Our analyses thus far were performed in the absence of any background synaptic activity. Would the presence of spontaneous background synaptic activity alter the spatiotemporal spread of microdomains across the dendritic structure? To address this, we incorporated randomly activated balanced excitatory and inhibitory synapses throughout the dendritic arbor, resulting in fluctuating membrane potential dynamics (Fig 10A). We then compared the dynamics of voltage propagation and the spread of signaling molecules, across the spine and the dendritic shaft, in the presence or absence of the background synaptic activity (Fig 10B and 10D). Quantitatively, owing to the predominant dendritic presence of background excitatory synapses (Fig 10A), there was a small increase in the dendritic response voltage and the consequent calcium influx in the presence of a background voltage fluctuation (Fig 10B). Overall, although this small increase in dendritic calcium resulted in a minor enhancement of pCaMKII levels, the spatiotemporal kinetics of the microdomains and the dynamics of their spread were comparable across the spine and the dendrites, irrespective of the presence or the absence of background activity (Fig 10B–10D). How do A-type K+ and T-type Ca2+ channels present on the dendrite regulate microdomain spread when synaptic stimulation arrives on a spine? To address this, we repeated our simulations described in Fig 9 with different densities of A-type K+ (Fig 11) and T-type Ca2+ (Fig 12) channels. We found that dendritic A-type potassium channels suppressed the spatiotemporal spread of pCaMKII microdomains (Fig 11), whereas dendritic T-type calcium channels enhanced the spatiotemporal spread of these downstream microdomains (Fig 12). As noted earlier, mechanistically, the A-type K+ channels regulate the spread of downstream microdomains by altering the voltage response whereas T-type Ca2+ channels act through the calcium influx they mediate, without significantly altering the voltage responses. As a consequence of this and because of the tremendous attenuation associated with calcium concentration when the synapse was localized on the spine (Fig 9), the impact of spine localization of the synapse was quantitatively different in the additional presence of these two channel subtypes (Fig 11 vs. Fig 12). Specifically, the impact of the additional presence of A-type K+ channels on pCaMKII spread (Fig 11) was significantly lower compared to that of T-type Ca2+ channels (Fig 12) when the synapse was localized on the spine, because of the respective indirect vs. direct roles of these channels in altering calcium concentration. Together, these results provide further evidence for active dendritic regulation of the spatiotemporal spread of microdomains in plasticity-inducing enzymes through distinct mechanisms and disparate dependencies on synaptic localization profiles. Our analyses thus far were limited to the presence of a single synapse-containing spine that was placed at the center of the oblique dendrite. How would the microdomain spread and the impact of active dendrites on such spread be affected by the presence of other spine structures on the same dendritic structure? To directly address this question, we randomly placed spines spread across the dendritic oblique under consideration in various numbers (100,200,500 and 1000). Each of these additional spines had the same passive and active properties, as well as the calcium handling mechanisms, although none of them received any synaptic connections. With one of the distinct configurations with reference to the total number of spines on the oblique dendrite, we stimulated the central synapse-containing spine with the TBS protocol, and compared the spatiotemporal spread of microdomains at various spine densities. As a direct consequence of the overall increase in surface area and the active nature of the membrane, we found that the spatial spread of voltage increased with increase in spine density (Fig 13A and 13B), especially in the oblique dendrite for propagation towards the trunk. As a consequence of the presence of additional spines, similar to the impact of increased dendritic diameter on microdomain spread [8], we observed a dissipation of calcium and pCamKII microdomains consequent to TBS. Specifically, we noted that the peak values of dendritic [Ca] and [pCaMKII] resulting from TBS progressively decreased, and the corresponding spatial spread gradually enhanced, with systematic increase in spine density (Fig 13C). How does the presence of active dendritic components alter microdomain propagation in the presence of spines? Do our conclusions on the role of KA and CaT channels change with the incorporation of dendritic spines? To test this, we repeated our analyses presented in Figs 11 and 12 with 1000 additional spines (~5 spines/μm [93]) randomly distributed on the oblique under consideration (Fig 14). We performed these analyses for distinct densities of KA (Fig 14A–14C) and CaT (Fig 14D and 14E) channel densities, with all other parameters (except for the incorporation of spines) remaining the same as the simulations performed to obtain Fig 11 (KA channels) and Fig 12 (CaT channels) respectively. We found our conclusions in the presence of these additional background spines to match with our earlier conclusions, whereby the presence of KA and CaT channels respectively suppressed and enhanced the signaling spread of dendritic calcium and pCaMKII (Fig 14). Although TBS is a widely used LTP-induction protocol, a more robust version of the protocol involves pairing some or all synaptic stimulations as part of TBS with somatically initiated action potentials. The version of TBS where all stimulations are paired with appropriately timed action potentials has been referred to as theta-burst pairing (TBP), with the backpropagating action potentials invading a significant proportion of the dendritic tree allowing for enhanced calcium influx during the protocol [12,20,54–58]. Would the presence of paired backpropagating action potentials alter our conclusions in terms of the spread of downstream microdomains and on the impact of active dendritic conductances on such spread? To test this, we paired synaptic stimulations within TBS with backpropagating action potentials (Fig 15A), and assessed the impact of such TBP on the spread of downstream microdomains. As expected from the backpropagation of action potentials, there was a small increase in the voltage responses observed in the oblique dendrite during TBP as compared to responses during TBS (Fig 15B). Although the backpropagating action potential amplitude was large on the dendritic trunk (Fig 1C), the invasion of backpropagating action potentials into obliques was minimal because of several factors including the branching structure of the dendritic arbor where obliques are made of smaller diameters, the expression of A-type K+ channels in obliques, and the slow recovery of dendritic sodium channels from inactivation [21,22,36,67,94]. As a consequence of this small increase in voltage response, we found small increases in the calcium and pCaMKII concentrations downstream in the spine and dendritic compartments (Fig 15B). These small changes in signaling concentrations also reflected in the spread across the different dendritic segment, overall suggesting that the impact of paired backpropagating action potentials on microdomain spread in oblique dendrites to be minimal (Fig 15C–15E). Next, we assessed the specific contributions of the active dendritic conductances in regulating the spread of downstream microdomains with TBS or TBP as the plasticity induction protocol. Specifically, we virtually knocked out (by setting the corresponding conductance to zero, only in the dendritic and spine compartments under consideration) either A-type K+ or T-type Ca2+ channels and reassessed the spread of microdomains across the signaling pathway (Fig 15C–15E). Consistent with our prior observations (Figs 4–8, Figs 11 and 12), we found that knocking out A-type K+ or T-type Ca2+ channels respectively enhanced and reduced the peak values and the spread of the calcium and pCaMKII microdomains (Fig 15C–15E). The small differences between TBP and TBS observed earlier, in terms of TBP eliciting a slightly larger calcium response were reflected in both knockout simulations as well (Fig 15D and 15E). Together, our results provide compelling evidence for a critical role for dendritic channels in regulating the spatiotemporal spread of microdomains in plasticity-inducing enzymes, effectuated by changes in excitability and/or calcium influx, in a manner that was invariant to several structural and parametric configurations.
  Our results clearly demonstrate that signaling spread is an active process that is not just governed by cell morphology and the topological motifs and binding kinetics associated with the signaling network [5,8, 95–97], but also by the types, kinetics and localization of ion channels in the dendritic arbor. This active amplification (Fig 6, Fig 11, Fig 15) or suppression (Fig 4, Figs 12–15) of biochemical signals and their spread by dendritic ion channel conductances call for a marked rethink of the complexities associated with subcellular signaling networks. Specifically, the numbers associated with ion channel subtypes, their auxiliary subunits, their subcellular localization profiles, and their local or global modulation through neuromodulatory substances or activity-dependent plasticity are staggeringly combinatorial [9,13–15,23]. The additional regulatory capacity of complex dynamics of subcellular signaling by this complex channel network implies a manifold increase in the complexity of molecular signal transduction. These results also clearly demonstrate several disparate combinations of neuronal parameters—associated with morphology, background spine density, signaling motifs, binding kinetics, diffusion and ion channel densities, for instance—could result in similar signal propagation in a given signaling network, pointing directly to degeneracy in spatiotemporal spread of signaling components [98]. In conjunction with recent literature on degeneracy in cellular-scale physiology and plasticity in hippocampal neurons [24,25,39,99–101], these results point to significant degeneracy in hippocampal physiology spanning different scales. What are the consequences of such combinatorial complexities and degeneracy associated with signaling networks? First, a growing body of established literature that spans several scales of biology has linked complexity and degeneracy as requirements for robustness in biological systems [69,98,102]. In this context, the degeneracy associated with signaling spread could be postulated as a mechanism for achieving robust signaling transfer and spread in the presence of external and internal noise factors. Our demonstration of active suppression or amplification of signaling strength and spread by specific channels provide an additional mechanism by which noise could be selectively suppressed through channels with specific kinetic and voltage-dependence properties. Second, theoretical frameworks at the cellular scale have argued for efficient coding of incoming information [103–105] through ion channel localization and plasticity [14,28,55,106,107], which at the molecular scale has found reflection in terms of maximizing information transfer by matching signaling dynamics to input source statistics [108–111]. The results described here provide a way to unify these two apparently disparate theoretical frameworks (in two different scales) by showing their convergence towards regulation of signal strength and spread. Future studies should endeavor to holistically unify the systems [103–105], cellular [14,28,55,106,107] and molecular [108–110] versions of the efficient coding hypothesis, accounting for input statistics and neuronal response properties at all scales. Third, tunability of information transfer is a critical requirement in several signaling networks [112,113]. With active conductances modulating signaling strength and spread, it is clear that the specific signal that is transmitted would now be dependent on the postsynaptic channel densities (along the pathway of spatial propagation) as well, and not just on the input stimulus and the signaling motifs, thus providing an additional regulatory mechanism for tuning signaling specificity and spread. Given the location-dependent expression profiles of different ion channels, the dependence of signaling spread on active dendritic conductances could directly translate to location-dependence of signaling spread. Specifically, the density of A-type K+ channels is higher in distal dendrites implying a significant suppression of the spread of signaling at distal locations. However, as different channel conductances have very different channel localization profiles and neuronal physiology is an emergent outcome of intricate and complex spatial and kinetic interactions between these different channels [9,13–15,23,39,99,114], the spread of downstream signaling molecules would also be determined by these interactions (Fig 3, Fig 5, Figs 7–15). Further, as several of these channels have non-uniform distributions, our results imply that the spread of downstream signaling microdomains might not be symmetric with reference to the synaptic location (the point of origin of the second messenger). Such a scenario provides a putative mechanism for spatiotemporally steering the spread and specificity of downstream signaling by regulating ion channel properties and localization profiles. Finally, given that oblique dendritic branches could have different branch strengths as a consequence of differences in A-type K+ channel expression [22], our results present a testable prediction that CaMKII-dependent plasticity could spread to channels and receptors located over larger distances in branches with lower A-type K+ channel expression (oblique dendrites with higher branch strength). In branches where the A-type K+ channel density is higher, on the other hand, could have the plasticity confined to a much smaller region owing to the constricted spread of the CaMKII microdomains. In this context, systematic analyses of the extent of spatiotemporal influence of different ion channel clusters on signaling microdomains, and of the dependence of such influence fields on the inhomogeneous distribution of different ion channels, the morphology of the dendritic arbor, the direction of propagation of voltage signals, the presence of background synaptic activity and the specific location of the channel in the dendritic arbor (e. g. , on the trunk vs. on the thinner obliques) would provide further quantitative insights into the roles of active dendrites on the spread of microdomains [114]. Our study presents the possibility of location-dependent expression profiles of channels and their impact on voltage and calcium signals as potential mechanisms to steer downstream signaling molecules. However, quantitative links between voltage recordings, calcium transients and the spatiotemporal spread of downstream microdomains should not be generalized without specific analyses of the channels and the signaling components expressed in a specific system. First, although voltage transients provide one trigger for cytosolic calcium influx, they are not the only source of calcium, with the ER and other store-operated mechanisms playing a role in regulating calcium influx [26,115–120]. Second, the calcium transients (both amplitude and spread) are critically regulated by several factors (Figs 3–14) including surface-area-to-volume ratio, spine densities in specific dendritic arbors, the densities of channels, receptors, several pumps, transporters and buffer concentrations [26,77,79,81,87,92,121]. Therefore, factors such as altered surface-area-to-volume ratio and nonhomogeneous distribution of any of these components would critically affect calcium amplitude and spread, and alter calcium transients and downstream signaling independent of changes in voltage transients [100]. Third, the signaling spread of downstream molecular species is not a simple function of voltage and calcium transients, but is also critically dependent on several factors including surface-area-to-volume ratio of the compartment, background spine densities, the binding affinities, diffusion and subcellular localization of the different signaling components, the topology of the signaling cascade and on the presence of negative regulators upstream [2,4, 8,11]. Finally, all these components—the ones that govern the voltage and calcium transients and those that govern the downstream signaling—critically interact with each other through several routes (Fig 3, Fig 5, Figs 7–15), implying a complex parametric and interactional landscape created by the presence of active dendritic components in regulating signaling microdomains. Based on these observations, we also postulate that active dendrites constitute a putative mechanism to regulate clustered plasticity, a phenomenon where spatially adjacent synapses undergo concurrent plasticity, in dendritic branches [122–127]. Under such a postulate, activity-dependent plasticity [13–15,19,20,22] and/or state-dependent neuromodulation [65,72,128,129] of active dendritic conductances could control the degree of compartmentalization of experience-dependent synaptic plasticity on specific dendrites, thereby regulating the degree of clustering of functional synaptic inputs [123,124,126,127]. Active dendritic conductances, especially restorative conductances, are therefore very critical in confining the spatiotemporal spread of plasticity, thereby assigning a dendritic branch as a fundamental functional unit of biophysical and biochemical signal integration [122–127]. Finally, such regulation of signaling spread by active dendrites, coupled with well-established plasticity and modulation in these dendritic conductances [13–15,19,20,22,65,72,128,129] imply that signaling spread in any signaling molecule in a dendritic branch is dynamic and state-dependent, and that it would be inappropriate to assign a static picture for such a complex dynamical system. This dynamical spread in signaling microdomains has to be assessed accounting for morphological properties of the structure, the network topology, the binding and diffusion kinetics of each signaling component, active dendritic conductances and their properties, the different substrates for the plasticity-inducing enzymes, the localization of all these components, and importantly behavioral state- and activity-dependent modulation and/or plasticity in each of these components. In accommodating the significant computational complexity associated with a reaction-diffusion system with stringent requirements on spatial discretization into a morphologically realistic model, we restricted our attention in this study to only a few channel types that are expressed in hippocampal dendrites. Although our analyses provide compelling evidence for a critical role for dendritic ion channels in regulating signaling spread, future studies should systematically characterize the impact of these channel types, including the HCN, calcium-activated potassium and inwardly rectifying potassium channels, on different signaling pathways. Another limitation of our analyses is the absence of metabotropic receptors and calcium-induced calcium release (CICR) and mechanisms associated with the activation of these metabotropic receptors. Specifically, it is established that CICR and other store-related mechanisms significantly interact with plasma membrane ion channels in yielding a complex landscape for the passive and active propagation of calcium within the cytosol [26,115–120]. These CICR mechanisms are critically tied to the activation of specific metabotropic receptors, and have been shown to be involved in certain forms of plasticity through specific signaling cascades [130,131]. Future studies should incorporate these ER-related mechanisms, metabotropic receptors and the complex interactions between dendritic ion channels and ER mechanisms [26,132] in deriving more routes for active-dendritic regulation of signaling microdomains through such interactions. Although our choice of the signaling pathway was motivated by its physiological relevance to plasticity induction and spread, and by the requirement to reduce computational complexity, the pathway is significantly oversimplified from the standpoint of known complexities in signaling motifs and pathways [4,95–97]. Given the possibility that different ion channels and their spatial and kinetic interactions [39,99,114] could differentially interact with different biochemical network motifs in different morphological structures [7,8], future studies should assess such multiscale interactions towards robustness to internal/external noise, increases in information transmission and storage capacity, efficient encoding of afferent signals and towards tunability of signaling specificity and spread [14,28,39,55,69,98,99,102–114]. From a generic standpoint, the basic conclusion of our analyses on a critical role for voltage-gated ion channels and their structural/functional interactions with the different signaling components in regulating signaling microdomains is extendible to other neuronal structures expressing active dendrites, and even to other cell types expressing voltage-gated ion channels. However, given the critical dependencies on these conclusions on the specific channels and their distributions, on cellular morphologies and on the topology of the signaling cascade, future studies should build cell-specific multiscale models that expand on the analyses presented here. Finally, our reaction-diffusion model is a deterministic system that coupled compartmental modeling with partial differential equations (of continuous concentrations of signaling species) to assess the spread of microdomains. Although such continuous deterministic models have provided significant insights into biological signal transduction, a more realistic approach to the problem would be to employ a stochastic discrete system (involving number of molecules of signaling species) that would mimic the stochastic interactions of individual molecules within biological systems [4,5, 11,133–135].
  A morphologically realistic multicompartmental 3D model (Fig 1A) was constructed from a reconstructed CA1 pyramidal neuron morphology (n123) taken from the Neuromorpho database [139,140]. Passive parameters were set as follows: Cm = 1 μF/cm2; Rm and Ra for various compartments along the somato-apical trunk were functions of radial distance of the compartment from the soma, x [55]: Ra (x) =Rasom+ (Raend−Rasom) 1+exp (300−x50) Ω. cm (1) Rm (x) =Rmsom+ (Rmend−Rmsom) 1+exp (300−x50) kΩ. cm2 (2) where Rmsom = 125 kΩ. cm2 and Rasom = 120 Ω. cm were values at the soma, and Rmend = 85 kΩ. cm2 and Raend = 70 Ω. cm were values assigned to the terminal end of the apical trunk (which was ~425 μm away from the soma for the reconstruction under consideration). The non-uniformity of passive properties considered here follows from evidence from the literature that has argued for the necessity of such non-uniformity to match electrophysiological measurements [55,114,118,141–143], and has been specifically employed to match passive input resistance of the somato-apical trunk [39]. The basal dendrites, the axonal compartments, and apical obliques had somatic Rm (Rmsom = 125 kΩ. cm2) and Ra (Rasom = 120 Ω. cm) [39]. Except for the oblique where the signaling microdomains were assessed (Fig 2A) this neuronal model was compartmentalized using the dλ rule [144] to ensure that each compartment was smaller than 0. 1 λ100, where λ100 is the space constant, computed at 100 Hz for the section under consideration. This process resulted in 873 compartments for the entire neuronal structure. As eliminating numerical errors in the estimation of Ca2+ signals (whose space constant is on the order of 0. 5 μm) requires much smaller compartment sizes than such electrical compartmentalization [26,63,145], the oblique (of total length 193 μm) highlighted in Fig 2A was compartmentalized to 2000 compartments (making each compartment size to be around 97 nm). This spatial discretization procedure resulted in a total number of 2864 compartments in the neuronal structure. Six different types of voltage gated ion channels (VGIC) were incorporated into these models: a fast Na+ (NaF), a delayed rectifier K+ (KDR), a hyperpolarization-activated cyclic-nucleotide-gated non-specific cationic (HCN), an A-type K+ (KA) and R- (CaR) and T-type Ca2+ (CaT). Biophysically realistic, Hodgkin-Huxley type conductance-based models derived from hippocampal pyramidal neurons were employed for modeling all these channels. The kinetics, voltage-dependencies and subcellular localization profiles of these channels were derived from hippocampal pyramidal neurons, and the details are provided below and in S1 Text. A canonical glutamate synapse consisting of colocalized NMDARs and AMPARs was placed at the mid point of a proximal oblique represented in Fig 2A. Specifically, the NMDAR current was modeled as a combination of three different types of ionic currents namely Ca2+, Na+ and K+ [29]: INMDA (v, t) =INMDANa (v, t) +INMDAK (v, t) +INMDACa (v, t) (7) where, INMDANa (v, t) =P¯NMDAPNas (t) MgB (v) vF2RT ([Na]i−[Na]oexp (−vFRT) 1−exp (−vFRT) ) (8) INMDAK (v, t) =P¯NMDAPKs (t) MgB (v) vF2RT ([K]i−[K]oexp (−vFRT) 1−exp (−vFRT) ) (9) INMDACa (v, t) =P¯NMDAPCas (t) MgB (v) 4vF2RT ([Ca]i−[Ca]oexp (−2vFRT) 1−exp (−2vFRT) ) (10) where P¯NMDA is the maximum permeability of the NMDAR; PCa = 10. 6, PNa = 1, PK = 1 [159,160]. Default values of concentrations were (in mM): [Na]i = 18, [Na]o = 140, [K]i = 140, [K]o = 5, [Ca]i = 50 × 10−6, [Ca]o = 2. The concentrations for sodium set its equilibrium potential at +55 mV and that for potassium at –90 mV. MgB (v) governs the magnesium dependence of the NMDAR current, given as [161]: MgB (v) = (1+[Mg]oexp (−0. 062v) 3. 57) −1 (11) with the default value of [Mg]o set at 2 mM. s (t) governed the kinetics of the NMDAR current, and was set as: s (t) =a (exp (−tτd) −exp (−tτr) ) (12) where a is a normalization constant, making sure that 0 ≤ s (t) ≤ 1, τd is the decay time constant, τr is rise time, with τr = 5 ms, and τd = 50 ms. Current through the AMPAR was modeled as the sum of currents carried by sodium and potassium ions: IAMPA (v, t) =IAMPANa (v, t) +IAMPAK (v, t) (13) where, IAMPANa (v, t) =P¯AMPAPNas (t) vF2RT ([Na]i−[Na]oexp (−vFRT) 1−exp (−vFRT) ) (14) IAMPAK (v, t) =P¯AMPAPKs (t) vF2RT ([K]i−[K]oexp (−vFRT) 1−exp (−vFRT) ) (15) where P¯AMPA is the maximum permeability of the AMPAR, whose default value was set at 20 nm/s, yielding a unitary voltage response of around 0. 3 mV. PNa was taken to be equal to PK [162]. s (t) was the same as that for the NMDA receptor, but with τr = 2 ms and τd = 10 ms [29]. P¯NMDA=NAR×P¯AMPA, with a default value for the NMDAR: AMPAR ratio (NAR) set at 1. 5. We employed theta burst stimulation (TBS), an established protocol for induction of synaptic plasticity [53], to assess the spread of signaling microdomains in the model. For TBS, the synapse was stimulated with a burst of 5 action potentials at 100 Hz, and this burst was repeated 30 times at 200 ms interval (5 Hz; theta frequency) each (Fig 2A). To analyze the effect of back-propagating action potentials (bAPs) initiated during the induction protocol on the spatio-temporal dynamics of microdomains, we used the theta burst pairing (TBP) protocol that has been employed for inducing neuronal plasticity [20,54,55]. In this protocol, each synaptic stimulation pulse during TBS was followed by a current pulse injection at the soma (current clamp amplitude = 2. 5 nA; duration of each pulse = 1 ms, each of which initiates an axo-somatic action potential that backpropagates into the dendritic arbor as well), with a time lag of 5 ms (Fig 15A). This led to the TBS to be paired with theta-burst firing (TBF), together resulting in the TBP protocol [20,54,55]. The overall Ca2+ dynamics was modeled as a function of various mechanisms that lead to changes in cytosolic Ca2+, [Ca]c, within a neuron. The partial differential equation governing the cytosolic Ca2+ dynamics was [26,38,163,164]: ∂[Ca]∂t=Dca∇2[Ca]+β (Jleak−JSERCA) +Rbuf+JCC−Jpump (16) where DCa represents experimentally determined diffusion coefficient for Ca2+ [165,166] and β constitutes the density of SERCA pumps and leak channels on the ER along the somato-dendritic axis. JCC, JSERCA, Rbuf, Jpump and Jleak represent the Ca2+ flux due to calcium channels, SERCA pumps, buffering, plasma membrane Ca2+ extrusion pumps and the ER leak channels, respectively. Radial diffusion of Ca2+ was incorporated by radial compartmentalization of the neuronal compartments into 4 concentric annuli, and diffusion along longitudinal axis of the neuron was also implemented [144]. The concentrations of individual molecular species (e. g. , calcium, calmodulin) are reported for the outermost annulus of different longitudinal compartments. Detailed descriptions for each of the fluxes are presented below, and a list of all parameters employed for modeling calcium dynamics, with values derived from previous studies [26,38,163,164], are listed in Table 1. ER leak channels and SERCA pump. The rate of Ca2+ influx into the cytoplasm through ER leak channels was modeled as [163]: Jleak=L (1−[Ca][Ca]ER) mM/ms (17) where L was chosen such that there was no net flux of Ca2+ between the ER and the cytosol at resting state. The Ca2+ uptake by sarcoplasmic endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase (SERCA) pump was modeled as [163]: JSERCA=Vmax[Ca]2[Ca]2+KP2mM/ms (18) where Vmax depicts the maximal rate of pump and KP is dissociation constant of Ca2+ binding to the pump. The signaling pathway that was assessed in this study is pictorially represented in Fig 1E [41–52]. The specific binding reactions are listed below, with all associated parameters tabulated as Table 2 [10,97,136–138]. First, we modeled the binding of cytosolic calcium (Ca) to calmodulin (CaM) to form the calcium-calmodulin complex (CaMCa4) as: The forward and backward reaction rates were specified as kCaMon and kCaMon×KCaM, respectively, with KCaM defining the dissociation constant related to this binding. Then, the binding of CaMCa4 to CaMKII (CaMKII) to form a complex (CaMKII_CaMCa4) complex was modeled as: CaMCa4+CaMKII⇋CaMKII_CaMCa4 (25) The forward and backward reaction rates were specified as kCaMKIIon and kCaMKIIon×KCaMKII, respectively, with KCaMKII defining the dissociation constant related to this binding. Note that CaMKII_CaMCa4 was alternately represented as CaMKII*, with the * representing activation (e. g. , Fig 2G). Autophosphorylation of CaMKII was modeled using simple first order kinetics [45,48,169] as: CaMKII_CaMCa4→pCaMKII_CaMCa4 (26) with the associated reaction rate specified as kCaMKIIAuto. Note that CaMKII_CaMCa4 was alternately represented as pCaMKII*, with the p representing phosphorylation (e. g. , Fig 2G). Finally, the dephosphorylation of CaMKII [50] occurred through protein phosphatase 1 (PP1): pCaMKII_CaMCa4+PP1→CaMKII_CaMCa4 (27) with the associated reaction rate specified as kPP1. Apart from the radial and longitudinal diffusion of calcium (Eq 16), signaling components represented in Eqs 24–26 also were subjected to radial as well as longitudinal diffusion: ∂[X]∂t=DX∇2[X] (28) where X represented any of CaM, CaMCa4, CaMKII, CaMKII_CaMCa4 or pCaMKII_CaMCa4. As initial conditions, CaM was set to the total calmodulin concentration, [CaM]T, CaMKII was set to the total CaMKII concentration, [CaMKII]T, with CaMCa4, CaMKII_CaMCa4 and pCaMKII_CaMCa4 set to zero. The total concentrations and the diffusion constants for these signaling components are listed in Table 2. Electrical measurements from the model were recorded employing established procedures [39,55] and are detailed below. To measure the backpropagation of action potentials into dendrites [16,39,147], an action potential was initiated at the soma (2 nA current for 1 ms) and the amplitude of the backpropagating action potential (bAP) was measured at various locations along the somatoapical trunk (Fig 1C). Input resistance (Rin) was measured from the local voltage response to a local injection of a 100-pA hyperpolarizing current pulse. The ratio of the steady-state voltage response to the injected current amplitude was taken as the Rin for that location, and the procedure was repeated for all locations along the somatoapical trunk to construct the Rin functional map (Fig 1D). To avoid ambiguities with reference to distance representations, distance from the synapse toward the terminal and trunk were designated positive and negative values, respectively (Fig 2A and 2B). The spatiotemporal spread of each signaling component was represented as a kymograph with the X-axis representing time, the Y-axis representing space (distance from the synapse towards the trunk and terminal), with the color code representing the numerical value of the component that was plotted. The spread of signaling microdomains through the analyzed signal pathway was depicted as a flow chart of kymographs [8]. The extent of the microdomain was quantified as the area under the curve (AUC) of the plot depicting the maximum value of the signaling component as a function of distance from the synapse (e. g. , Fig 2F). In computing the AUC for individual compartments, whereas the entire spatial stretch of the compartment was employed for the spine head and spine neck, the dendritic AUC was computed over the span of 50 μm on either side of the synaptic (or spine) location. When the signaling spread was quantified for different parametric configurations, these plots were computed for each parametric configuration (e. g. , Fig 4G) and the AUC values obtained from these plots were assessed as a function of the parameter that was being varied (e. g. , Fig 4K). With such quantification, an increase or a decrease in the computed AUC would be a measure of enhancement or suppression, respectively, in the spatial spread of the corresponding signaling microdomain. In performing sensitivity analyses with reference to several critical parameters, the default value associated with each parameter was either increased or decreased two-fold (e. g. , Fig 5) to assess the impact of such a change in the microdomain spread (quantified as the AUC mentioned above). For simulations where the synapse was localized on a spine (Figs 9–15), a spine neck (length 1 μm × 0. 1 μm diameter) connected to a spine head (length 0. 5 μm × 0. 5 μm diameter) were added at the center of the oblique dendritic shaft (Fig 9A). The spine-head had 10 compartments whereas the spine-neck had 20 compartments, making the size of each compartment to be ~50 nm. The spine had the same passive and active conductances as that of the center of the oblique dendrite from which it originated: Rm = 125 kΩ. cm2, Ra = 120 Ω. cm, g¯Na = 16 mS/cm2, g¯KDR = 10 mS/cm2, g¯KA = 60. 55 mS/cm2, g¯h = 68. 75 μS/cm2, g¯CaT = 285. 7 μS/cm2. A single synapse containing colocalized AMPA and NMDA receptors was placed at the center of the spine head. The AMPAR permeability was set such that the unitary EPSP amplitude at the soma was ~0. 2 mV to match experimental observations [64,170,171], and was set at P¯AMPA = 15 nm/s (somatic voltage with spine: 0. 22 mV; somatic voltage without spine: 0. 25 mV). The NMDAR permeability was set at 1. 5× of the AMPAR permeability. To study the impact of spine density on the spatiotemporal spread of biochemical microdomains, we incorporated several spines throughout the oblique dendrite under consideration. Each of these spines had the same morphology as the synapse-containing spine (Fig 9A): spine-neck (length 1 μm × 0. 1 μm diameter) connected to a spine-head (length 0. 5 μm × 0. 5 μm diameter). Each spine had the same passive and active conductances as that of the oblique dendritic compartment from which it originated, including the calcium handling mechanisms. To compare the effect of different densities of spines on the spatiotemporal spread of biochemical microdomains in active dendrites, we compared simulation outcomes in a control (one synapse-containing spine; ~0 spine/μm otherwise) outcomes where the oblique dendrite was populated with spines at four distinct densities. Specifically, the four other cases were built with 100,200,500 and 1000 spines (corresponding to ~0. 5 spines/μm, ~1 spine/μm, ~2. 6 spines/μm and ~5 spines/μm, respectively) distributed randomly (compartments chosen from a uniform distribution) throughout the 2000 compartments of the 193-μm length of the dendritic oblique. All spines except for the synapse-carrying spine (Fig 9A) were devoid of any synaptic connections. With this morphological configuration that reflected the characteristics of a hippocampal pyramidal neuron dendrite, we applied TBS through the central synapse-containing spine and looked at the effects of the spatiotemporal kinetics of each species in our chosen biochemical pathway with different spine densities. We tested the effects of A-type K+ channel and T-type Ca2+ channel densities for the 1000 spine (density = ~5 spines/μm) case, as this spine density represented the closest approximation to experimental evidence [93]. For simulating background synaptic activity impinging on the neuron, we incorporated balanced excitation and inhibition so as to keep the average resting membrane potential (RMP) at around –65 mV [172]. One excitatory synapse was placed at each compartment of the somato-apical dendritic arbor within a 300 μm radial distance. Similarly, one inhibitory synapse was placed at each compartment within a radial distance of 50 μm perisomatically, including both apical and basal segments. For both the excitatory and inhibitory synaptic populations, independent random spike generators, each firing at an average rate of 4 Hz was used for input stimulation of each synapse. All the synapses were modeled using an Ohmic formulation with the current through the synapse defined as: isyn (t) =gsyn (t) (V−ER) (29) where gsyn (t) defined the time-dependent evolution of each synapse after the onset of an afferent spike, and ER defined the reversal potential for the synaptic receptors (ER = 0 mV for excitatory synapses and ER = –80 mV for inhibitory synapses). gsyn (t) was modeled using a double exponential synaptic formulation: gsyn (t) =g¯[exp (−t/τd) −exp (−t/τr) ] (30) where g¯ defined the maximal conductance of each synapse set at 0. 1 nS for excitatory synapses and 0. 6 nS for inhibitory synapses. τr (= 2 ms) was the synaptic rise time constant and τd (= 10 ms) was the decay time constant for all the synapses. Upon stimulation with such randomized background activity, the mean somatic RMP was found to be –64. 33 mV ± 0. 74 mV (Fig 10A). All simulations were performed in the NEURON simulation environment [144]. The resting membrane potential of the model neuron was fixed at –65 mV. For all experiments, the simulation temperature was set at 34°C and ion channel kinetics were appropriately adjusted according to their experimentally determined Q10 coefficients. The integration time step was fixed at 25 μs for all simulations to avoid numerical errors in the solution to the differential equations. Data analysis was performed using custom-built software under the IGOR Pro (Wavemetrics Inc. , USA) programming environment. The NEURON codes employed to perform the simulations reported in this article are available at the following URL: https: //senselab. med. yale. edu/ModelDB/ShowModel. cshtml? model=244848. An updated version of the code in the website fixes and accounts for a volume-scaling bug (See S1 Fig). All biochemical reactions involving Ca, CaM and CaMKII, their forward rate constants and dissociation constants are listed in S2 Table.
summary: The spatiotemporal spread of biochemical signals in neurons and other cells regulate signaling specificity, tuning of signal propagation, along with specificity and clustering of adaptive plasticity. Theoretical and experimental studies have demonstrated a critical role for cellular morphology and the topology of signaling networks in regulating this spread. In this study, we add a significantly complex dimension to this narrative by demonstrating that voltage-gated ion channels on the plasma membrane could actively amplify or suppress the strength and spread of downstream signaling components. Given the expression of different ion channels with wide-ranging heterogeneity in gating kinetics, localization and density, our results point to an increase in complexity of and degeneracy in signaling spread, and unveil a powerful mechanism for regulating biochemical-signaling pathways across different cell types.
keywords: voltage-gated ion channels
  medicine and health sciences
  action potentials
  nervous system
  membrane potential
  signaling networks
  electrophysiology
  neuroscience
  ion channels
  network analysis
  calcium signaling
  neuronal dendrites
  neuronal plasticity
  computer and information sciences
  animal cells
  proteins
  calcium channels
  biophysics
  physics
  biochemistry
  signal transduction
  cellular neuroscience
  cell biology
  anatomy
  synapses
  physiology
  neurons
  biology and life sciences
  cellular types
  physical sciences
  voltage-gated calcium channels
  cell signaling
  neurophysiology
title: Active dendrites regulate the spatiotemporal spread of signaling microdomains