article: DNA methylation of retroviral promoters and enhancers localized in the provirus 5′ long terminal repeat (LTR) is considered to be a mechanism of transcriptional suppression that allows retroviruses to evade host immune responses and antiretroviral drugs. However, the role of DNA methylation in the control of HIV-1 latency has never been unambiguously demonstrated, in contrast to the apparent importance of transcriptional interference and chromatin structure, and has never been studied in HIV-1-infected patients. Here, we show in an in vitro model of reactivable latency and in a latent reservoir of HIV-1-infected patients that CpG methylation of the HIV-1 5′ LTR is an additional epigenetic restriction mechanism, which controls resistance of latent HIV-1 to reactivation signals and thus determines the stability of the HIV-1 latency. CpG methylation acts as a late event during establishment of HIV-1 latency and is not required for the initial provirus silencing. Indeed, the latent reservoir of some aviremic patients contained high proportions of the non-methylated 5′ LTR. The latency controlled solely by transcriptional interference and by chromatin-dependent mechanisms in the absence of significant promoter DNA methylation tends to be leaky and easily reactivable. In the latent reservoir of HIV-1-infected individuals without detectable plasma viremia, we found HIV-1 promoters and enhancers to be hypermethylated and resistant to reactivation, as opposed to the hypomethylated 5′ LTR in viremic patients. However, even dense methylation of the HIV-1 5′LTR did not confer complete resistance to reactivation of latent HIV-1 with some histone deacetylase inhibitors, protein kinase C agonists, TNF-α, and their combinations with 5-aza-2deoxycytidine: the densely methylated HIV-1 promoter was most efficiently reactivated in virtual absence of T cell activation by suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid. Tight but incomplete control of HIV-1 latency by CpG methylation might have important implications for strategies aimed at eradicating HIV-1 infection.
  The current protocols of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) are efficient in decreasing the HIV-1 load below the limit of detection, reducing mortality due to HIV-1 infection. Despite the potency of HAART, however, HIV-1 establishes latent infection in a reservoir of resting memory CD4+ T cells, which escapes host immune responses and antiretroviral therapy. HIV-1 latency is thus the main obstacle to the eradication of the virus from infected patients [1]–[5]. Transcriptional shutdown and multistep formation of restrictive chromatin at long terminal repeats (LTR) are two interconnected events leading to the latent state of HIV-1 provirus. HIV-1 LTR-driven transcription is silenced in the absence of cellular transcription initiation factors NF-κB and NFAT [6], [7] or in the presence of repressors such as CBF-1 and YY1 [8], [9]. Low levels of the Tat transactivator [10] or the Tat-activated elongation factor P-TEFb [11], and sustained production of prematurely terminated RNA transcripts from the HIV-1 promoter [12], [13] are hallmarks of HIV-1 latency. At the level of chromatin, entry of HIV-1 into latency requires recruitment of the histone deacetylase type 1 (HDAC-1) [8], [9], [14], histone methyltransferase Suv39H1, and heterochromatin protein HP1 [15], [16] to the chromatin around the HIV-1 LTR. It was suggested that in contrast to the handful of factors triggering HIV-1 latency, NF-κB alone has the potential to reactivate HIV-1 from its latent state, and it might be a master factor in this process [7]. However, more recent reports show that HIV-1 can be activated in an NF-κB-independent way by transcription factor ΔVII-Ets-1, without causing significant T cell activation [17], and that Lck and NFAT, but not NF-κB, are required for optimal latent virus reactivation in primary memory T cells [18]. Transcriptional reactivation is accompanied by changes in the local chromatin structure and by the recruitment of chromatin remodeling factors such as SWI/SNF [19], [20] and histone acetyl transferases such as CBP and p300 [21], [22]. CpG methylation of retroviral promoter sequences is another transcriptional silencing mechanism which contributes to a difficulty of access of transcription factors to the target DNA. Not surprisingly, CpG methylation of retroviral promoter and enhancer sequences situated in the 5′ LTR has been correlated with silencing of various retroviruses, both infectious and endogenous, as shown for human T-cell leukemia virus type-1 [23], [24], Moloney murine leukemia virus [25], [26], Rous sarcoma virus [27], [28], and human endogenous retroviruses of the H, K, and W families [29], [30]. The role of proviral DNA methylation in HIV-1 latency is not clear. CpG methylation of the HIV-1 promoter inhibits transcription of in vitro-methylated plasmids transfected into cells [31], [32], and it has been suggested as a mechanism for the maintenance of HIV-1 latency in long-term-infected U937 cells [33] and in latently infected ACH-2 cell line [34], both cell systems containing silencing mutations in the HIV-1 promoter. In contrast to the previously described systems, we and others have shown that transcriptional suppression of wild-type HIV-1 promoter is not accompanied by CpG methylation of the 5′ LTR [35]–[37]. Here, we analyzed the relation of CpG methylation of the HIV-1 5′ LTR to transcriptional suppression and reactivation of HIV-1 provirus in a model consisting of Jurkat clonal cell lines harboring a latent HIV-1 LTR–driven retroviral vector [38], [39]. We compared our findings obtained in this model with the relationships between the methylation pattern, latency, and reactivation of latent HIV-1 provirus in CD4+ T cells of long-term aviremic and viremic patients.
  To study the role of CpG methylation of the HIV-1 promoter in proviral latency and during reactivation, we have chosen the Jurkat clonal cell lines A2, A8, G10, and H12 latently infected with a “mini-virus” which contained the LTR-Tat-IRES-EGFP-LTR genome [38], and the cell line JNLGFP latently infected with the complete EGFP-coding virus [40] (Figure 1). There is a single proviral copy per cell in lines A2, A8, G10, and H12 and five copies per cell in line JNLGFP (Table S1). The levels of CpG methylation in the assayed cell lines were determined by bisulfite sequencing. In the first step of this technique, sodium bisulfite converts cytosine residues in the genomic DNA to uracil, but leaves 5-methylcytosine residues unaffected. The bisulfite-treated DNA is then amplified by primers specific for the 5′ LTR, and the PCR product is cloned and sequenced. Results are interpreted based on the assumption that each cloned sequence represents an individual HIV-1 promoter, and that cytosine residues in the final sequence represent the 5′-methyl cytosines in the template DNA. Using bisulfite sequencing, we found zero or low levels of CpG methylation in the 5′ LTR (0% in A2,0% in A8,27±7% [mean±SEM] in G10,7±2% in H12, and 0% in JNLGFP) (Figure 1A and B). We also found low levels of EGFP expression in all five cell lines (2±1% [mean±SEM] of EGFP-positive cells in A2,0. 4±0. 1% in A8,0. 3±0. 2% in G10,5±1% in H12, and 2±1% in JNLGFP). Thus we confirmed, by means of additional clonal cell lines, that 5′ LTR methylation is not required for HIV-1 promoter silencing [35]. For the next series of experiments, we chose the intermediate H12 clonal cell line, harboring a single proviral copy integrated in the first intron of the ubiquilin gene (chr. 9; 9q21. 32) in the sense of the ubiquilin transcription (Figure 1C, Table S2). Differences between distribution of the 5′-methylcytosines in the HIV-1 promoters in the H12 clonal cell line and other clonal cell lines were not statistically significant. To select cells harboring latent HIV-1 provirus resistant to reactivation, we sorted the H12 cells that after two consecutive cycles of stimulation with TNF-α and PMA did not express the HIV-1 reporter gene EGFP (Figure 2A and Figure S1). This enrichment procedure resulted in increased levels of cells harboring HIV-1 provirus resistant to reactivation (from 22. 2% after the first negative sorting to 66. 2% after the second negative sorting), while concomitantly, CpG methylation in the 5′ LTR augmented from 7% in H12 cells before the first stimulation to 59% in H12 cells after the second negative sorting (Figure 2A and Figure S1G). To study the relation between the density of CpG methylation and the reactivation of latent HIV-1 at the level of single proviral copy, we cloned the enriched population using limiting dilution. Reactivation levels of HIV-1 provirus in the resulting 16 clones stimulated with TNF-α and PMA varied between 0. 4% and 44. 5% of cells (Figure 2B), providing a basis for testing the role of CpG methylation in the process. For further experiments, we selected the clones 1B6 and 2D12, which responded distinctly to reactivation with TNF-α and PMA (Figure 2B) and which showed low spontaneous activity of the HIV-1 promoter (Figure 2C and F). In the 1B6 clone, stimulation with TNF-α and PMA reactivated the HIV-1 provirus from latency in 44. 5% of cells (Figure 2D), and 32% of CpGs in the 5′ LTR were methylated (Figure 2E). In contrast, the cell clone 2D12 displayed active HIV-1 promoter in only 4. 7% of cells after stimulation with TNF-α and PMA (Figure 2G), and 86% of CpGs in the 5′ LTR were methylated (Figure 2H). Expression of early activation marker of CD4+ T cells CD69 on the surface of the majority of 1B6 cells (97. 6%, Figure 2D) and 2D12 cells (86. 9%, Figure 2G) stimulated with TNF-α and PMA shows that the weak reactivation of HIV-1 promoter was not caused by the inability of the host cells to be activated. Proportions of methylated CpGs in both clones stimulated with TNF-α and PMA remained stable for at least the next 24 h (Figure 2E and H). As shown in Figure 2I, the density of 5′ LTR CpG methylation in clonal cell lines H12,1B6,2D12, A2, A8, G10, and in cell cultures derived from the cell line H12 negatively correlates with the reactivation of HIV-1 promoters, as determined at the transcriptional level by quantitative RT-PCR (not shown) and at the translational level from expression of EGFP. Next, we investigated directly whether reactivation of latent HIV-1 provirus is accompanied by demethylation of the 5′ LTR. For this purpose, we stimulated H12 and 2D12 cells with TNF-α and PMA for 24 h and performed methylation analysis in sorted EGFP+ and EGFP− cells (Figure 3). The proportion of methylated CpG in sorted EGFP+ H12 cells and EGFP+ 2D12 cells was not significantly changed in comparison to non-sorted H12 and 2D12 cells. The proportion of methylated CpG significantly increased in negatively sorted EGFP− H12 cells (as already shown in Figure 2A). It did not change, however, in sorted EGFP− 2D12 cells, where the HIV-1 promoter is already heavily methylated. Taken together, these results show that reactivation of HIV-1 promoter does not require immediate demethylation. To show that the differences between H12 and 2D12 cells were not caused by the different capacity to methylate their DNA, we quantified the global CpG methylation level in genomic DNA of H12 and 2D12 cells. The differences between these clones were not statistically significant (71±2% of methylated CpG in H12 cells and 68±6% of methylated CpG in 2D12 cells). To assess the resistance of latent HIV-1 with densely methylated promoter to reactivation we exposed both H12 and 2D12 clones to TNF-α, to protein kinase C (PKC) agonists (PMA and prostratin), to inhibitors of HDAC (sodium butyrate (NaBut), trichostatin A (TSA), suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA), and apicidin), to inhibitors of DNA methyltransferases, DNMT (5-aza-2-deoxycytidine (5-aza-dC) and zebularine), and/or to their combinations (Figure 4). Whereas cell activation levels as measured by expression of the CD69 marker were similar in both cell lines, reactivation of latent HIV-1 promoter was much stronger in the H12 cell line than in the 2D12 cell line. Reactivation of the HIV-1 LTR was determined after 24-h exposure to reactivation signals. In addition, reactivation with DNMT inhibitors, weak stimulators of the HIV-1 LTR, was determined also after 48-h treatment. To measure reactivation of the HIV-1 LTR on comparable basis, all data were obtained by gating for live cells after vital staining. Among the examined inducers, HDAC inhibitors, including TSA, NaBut, SAHA, and their combinations with other HIV-1-reactivating compounds showed the highest cell toxicity (Figure S2). The most important relative differences in reactivation of HIV-1 promoter in H12 and 2D12 cells were detected for the agonists of PKC. PMA induced 54% and prostratin 66% of EGFP+ H12 cells but failed to activate heavily methylated LTRs in 2D12 cells (as few as 1% and 2% of EGFP+ 2D12 cells, respectively). The most efficient inducers of reactivation of the densely methylated HIV-1 promoter in 2D12 cells were inhibitors of HDAC, including TSA, NaBut and SAHA. Importantly, the HDAC inhibitors did not induce significantly higher expression of CD69 than that found in non-induced control cells. Inhibitors of DNMT did not increase the percentages of EGFP+ H12 cells over the background value (13% in both zebularine- and 5-aza-dC-treated cultures vs. 12% in non-induced H12 cells), and did not induce significant levels of EGFP in 2D12 cells (0. 02% with zebularine and 0. 04% with 5-aza-dC). The most efficient combinations of inducers in 2D12 cells were combinations of TNF-α or prostratin with inhibitors of HDAC (TSA, NaBut, and SAHA), and combinations of TNF-α or 5-aza-dC with SAHA. The strongest synergistic effects (synergistic index >4) were observed between PMA and apicidin, 5-aza-dC, or zebularine and between 5-aza-dC and prostratin or apicidin. Although reactivation of HIV-1 from latency in the 2D12 cell line in comparison with the H12 cell line was strongly reduced, most tested compounds induced low but significant expression of the HIV-1 promoter in 2D12 cells. To elucidate the contribution of chromatin structure to the maintenance of the latent state of HIV-1, we investigated histone modifications at hypo- and hypermethylated HIV-1 5′ LTRs (Figure 5). We found that the levels of histone 3 (H3) dimethylated on lysine 4 (diMeH3K4), representing active chromatin, that were associated with HIV-1 promoter were significantly lower in 2D12 cells than in H12 cells (89. 8 times lower in non-stimulated cells and 65. 7 times lower in stimulated cells). In contrast, the levels of acetylated H3, another marker of active chromatin, in non-stimulated cells of both cell lines were similar. After stimulation, the levels of acetylated H3 increased (6. 2 times in H12 cells and 2. 3 times in 2D12 cells). The levels of H3 trimethylation on lysine 9 (triMeH3K9), representing repressive chromatin, in non-activated cells were 4. 1 times higher in cells of the 2D12 line than in cells of the H12 line. The levels of triMeH3K27, also representing repressive chromatin, dropped 13. 1 times after activation of H12 cells. In non-activated cells, the triMeH3K27 levels were 2. 9 times higher in 2D12 cells than in H12 cells. Whereas after activation the level of H3K9 trimethylation in cells of the H12 line did not significantly change, it decreased 2. 9 times in cells of the 2D12 line. Thus, hypermethylated DNA of proviral promoter in 2D12 cells is more strongly associated with repressive chromatin structure than hypomethylated DNA of proviral promoter in H12 cells. Our next aim was to compare the methylation pattern of latent HIV-1 promoter in our in vitro model with that in infected individuals. We inspected the 5′ LTR CpG methylation in latent reservoirs of resting CD4+ T cells in patients in whom HAART resulted in long-term suppression of plasma viremia and in viremic patients (Table 1 and Table S3). The low percentage of HIV provirus-harboring cells in the latent reservoir and the low sensitivity of PCR after bisulfite treatment of DNA hampered determination of the methylation pattern in several analyzed patients. Thus, from a cohort of 18 HAART-treated patients without detectable plasma viremia, we analyzed six individuals, and from 13 viremic patients we analyzed seven individuals with ≥103 HIV-1 DNA copies per million CD4+ cells (Table 1 and Figure 6A and B). The 5′ LTR of HIV-1 in six patients without detectable plasma viremia contained 20%, 30%, 48%, 71%, 96%, and 100% of methylated CpGs compared with <0. 1% of methylated CpGs in HIV-1 promoters in a control group of viremic patients (p = 0. 0012, Figure 6B). This striking difference shows that the high level of CpG methylation is a specific characteristic of HIV-1 promoters in aviremic patients. However, numerous non-methylated proviral sequences were found, particularly in two patients with the lowest level of methylated CpGs (patients 14 and 18). We further analyzed the sequence variability of HIV-1 promoters of aviremic patients in the set of sequences obtained after bisulfite treatment. Although rigorous phylogenetic analysis of the bisulfite-treated 5′ LTR of HIV-1 sequences is precluded by the conversion of the majority of cytosine residues to thymine (except for methylated cytosine residues), we used the neighbor-joining method to compare different sequences of HIV-1 promoters. In three aviremic patients harboring the lowest proportion of methylated CpGs in the 5′ LTR of HIV-1 (patients 13,14,18), the non-methylated and methylated sequences clearly segregate in different sequence clusters (Figure 6A). Also densely methylated sequences (patients 4 and 9) clustered in two different groups. In conclusion, limited numbers of HIV-1 proviruses with hypermethylated promoters are present in the long-term HAART-treated aviremic individuals in contrast to non-methylated promoters of viremic patients. Clusters of identical or nearly-identical 5′LTR sequences point to a usually observed variability of HIV-1 sequences in infected persons and arise the question whether the HIV-1 sequences analyzed for the methylation profile represent replication-competent or defective proviruses. To this end, we assayed whether a significant subset of defective proviruses consisting of extremely deleted HIV-1 genomes [41] is more prevalent in memory CD4+ T cells of viremic or aviremic patients. This subset of defective proviruses, detected in PBMCs of most HIV-1-infected persons, can be formed by reverse transcriptase jumps over the central part of HIV-1 genomes, so that the resulting molecules more frequently contain the LTRs than the central sequences of HIV-1 genome [41]. Quantitative PCR was used to compare the quantity of the central (tat gene) and terminal (LTR) HIV-1 sequences, and to determine the LTR/tat ratio (Protocol S1 and Table 1). Therefore, by means of the LTR/tat ratio we estimated the proportion of truncated to full-length proviruses in viremic and aviremic patients. We have not found any significant differences between the levels of tat and LTR sequences in DNA of aviremic patients 4,10,14, and 18. In DNA of all tested viremic patients, we have found prevailing terminal LTRs over tat sequences, consistently with our previous demonstration that accumulation of truncated proviruses is a consequence of HIV-1 replication in infected individuals [41], [42]. Thus, truncated proviruses are not prevalent in the majority of aviremic patients. Finally, we investigated whether the density of CpG methylation of HIV-1 promoters harbored in memory CD4+ T cells of long-term aviremic individuals correlates with the resistance of HIV-1 to reactivation signals. To this end, purified memory CD4+ T cells of HIV-1-infected individuals were stimulated with TNF-α and PMA, with TSA and PMA, and with 5-aza-dC for three days; they were serially diluted and co-cultured with allogeneic phytohemagglutinin (PHA) -activated CD4+ T cells; and the quantity of HIV-1 secreted to cell-free supernatant was determined (Figure 6C–F). The results show a negative correlation between methylation levels of the HIV-1 5′ LTR and percentage of reactivable proviruses ex vivo calculated on the basis of end point titers from aviremic individuals with combinations of TNF-α and PMA and of TSA and PMA (Figure 6D and E). These HIV-1 inducers reactivated proviruses only from the memory CD4+ T cells of long-term aviremic individuals harboring high proportions of non-methylated promoters (patients 14 and 18). Neither the combination of TNF-α and PMA nor that of TSA and PMA reactivated HIV-1 proviruses with promoters containing ≥48% of methylated CpGs (n = 4). Although memory CD4+ T cells were stimulated in the presence of IL-2 and in the absence of inhibitors of integrase, no outgrowth of possibly non-integrated proviruses was observed in the cells of 4 out of 6 aviremic patients. Reactivation of HIV-1 provirus containing 96% of methylated CpGs (n = 1) with 5 µM 5-aza-dC shows that memory CD4+ T cells of this patient contained replication-competent virus, which could be reactivated by the demethylating agent (Figure 6F). In contrast to proviruses in aviremic individuals, which are hardly reactivable ex vivo, CD4+ T cells of all viremic patients produced HIV-1 as a result of three-day culture in the presence of IL-2 followed by a simple co-culture with allogeneic PHA-activated CD4+ T cells (Figure 6C).
  Our present work demonstrates that CpG methylation of the HIV-1 5′LTR could be an important epigenetic mechanism that maintains the latency of HIV-1 proviruses by preventing their reactivation. Our results explain the ambiguous conclusions emerging from methylation studies in cell lines latently infected with HIV-1 [31]–[36], [43] and, of particular importance, correlate the in vitro data with data from HIV-1-infected patients. CpG methylation in HIV-1-infected patients has not been studied so far. In spite of the low number of HIV provirus-harboring cells in the latent reservoir and the decreased sensitivity of PCR after bisulfite treatment of DNA, our work shows the possibility of studying, and possibly acting upon, the epigenetic control of HIV-1 latency in infected individuals. Tight control of HIV-1 latency by CpG methylation of the 5′ LTR could be important for the maintenance of, and ultimately for purging, the reservoir of latently infected cells in infected individuals. The high resistance of densely methylated latent HIV-1 proviruses in the 2D12 cell line and in CD4+ T cells of aviremic patients to the majority of HIV-1-reactivating compounds tested in our work illustrates the difficulty of purging the reservoir of latent HIV-1 with T-cell-activating agents such as IL-2 and OKT3 [1], [2], [44], prostratin [45]–[47], and IL-7 [47]–[49]. On the other hand, the resistance of densely methylated HIV-1 proviruses to reactivation signals was incomplete, and we can assume that even these proviruses are not stably latent and could produce infectious progeny after suitable stimulation. Thus, a high methylation level of the 5′ LTR contributes to the multiple mechanisms controlling HIV-1 latency that make eradication of HIV-1 problematic, unless new approaches are developed. In addition to epigenetic mechanisms, the expression of HIV-1 provirus can be abrogated by genetic defects. The 5′LTR sequences from infected viremic or aviremic patients analyzed by bisulfite sequencing did not show any significant mutations in comparison with corresponding sequences present in the HIV-database [50]. It is, however, difficult to screen genetic defects in the inner HIV-1 sequences; long-distance sequence analysis of DNA adjacent to LTR is hampered on the bisulfite-treated template and our analysis of defective viruses detects just gross deletions containing the tat region. Using the 5-aza-dC, we have rescued the replication-competent virus from one patient (No. 10) where 5′LTR sequences display almost full methylation of all CpGs. Although we cannot completely exclude the possibility of virus rescue from a non-methylated provirus that escaped our methylation analysis, this result strongly suggests that the parental replication-competent HIV-1 proviruses in this patient contain nearly fully methylated promoters. At the moment, we are unable to quantify the proportion of the latent replication-competent proviruses in the whole proviral population. As the first approximation we used a quantitative assay, by means of which we detected significantly higher proportion of defective truncated proviruses in viremic than in aviremic patients. This testifies against the possibility that methylated proviruses are preferentially defective. We extended here our previous in vitro results showing that CpG methylation of the HIV-1 5′ LTR is not necessary for the establishment of viral latency [35]. Indeed, the latent reservoir of some aviremic patients contained high proportions of the non-methylated 5′ LTR. However, the latency controlled solely by transcriptional interference and by chromatin-dependent mechanisms tends to be leaky and easily reactivable. On the basis of our results, we propose a two-step model of epigenetic control of HIV-1 latency (Figure 7). The hypomethylated HIV-1 5′ LTR in the state of reactivable latency in the clone H12 is significantly less associated with acetylated H3 chromatin structure than that in the active state after provirus reactivation. In contrast, dense CpG methylation of the proviral promoter (exemplified by the clone 2D12), probably together with hallmarks of the repressive histone code such as low levels of H3K4 di-methylation and high levels of H3K9 and H3K27 tri-methylation, could contribute to the “locked” silent state of the provirus and make the return of the provirus to an active state inefficient [51]. Reactivation of HIV-1 promoter is not accompanied by significant demethylation of CpG in the 5′ HIV-1 LTR (Figure 3); however, it is accompanied by a rapid drop of H3K9 trimethylation. Indeed, inhibitors of DNMT alone do not induce reactivation of the HIV-1 promoter in 2D12 cells. In contrast, the HDAC inhibitors, TSA, NaBut, and namely SAHA, efficiently reactivate the densely methylated HIV-1 promoter. Moreover, HDAC inhibitors, which are generally anti-inflammatory [52], reactivate HIV-1 latency in virtual absence of T cell activation; this corroborates the results shown previously in the context of HIV-1 reactivation from latency by transcription factor ΔVII-Ets-1 [17]. Activation of CD4+ T cells is, therefore, dispensable for reactivation of HIV-1 provirus. Among assayed inducers of reactivation of HIV-1 promoter, only PKC agonists were concomitantly strong inducers of the early marker of activation of T cells, CD69. Thus, chromatin changes precede CpG methylation of the 5′ LTR in the course of establishment of HIV-1 latency, and chromatin changes also initiate reactivation of latent HIV-1 in spite of the presence of demethylated CpG (Figure 7). This kinetics corresponds well with the fact that passive demethylation occurring in the S-phase of the cell cycle is rather slow to precede the rapid onset of activation. In contrast to our results, a clear trend toward demethylation of CpG has been observed after 48 hours of TNF-α treatment of cell line ACH-2 [34]. CpG demethylation after reactivation of latent HIV-1 by different signals in different cell lines is intensively studied in our laboratories. As in the majority of latently infected cells in infected individuals [53], [54], the HIV-1 provirus in the H12 cell line is integrated within a gene. Surprisingly, distinct levels of resistance of HIV-1 provirus to reactivation could be established at the same integration site. Thus, the HIV-1 latency in H12 cells is reactivation-prone, whereas in 2D12 cells with the provirus inserted at exactly the same genomic site the HIV-1 latency is reactivation-resistant. Both distinct states of HIV-1 latency are quasi-stable during cell divisions and both states are re-established after the return of reactivated HIV-1 to a basal latent state. Positive selection of EGFP+ H12 cells harboring reactivated virus also results in the return to a basal latent state with an unchanged methylation profile in the absence of the activation stimulus; however, tightly controlled HIV-1 proviruses could be negatively selected from the population of EGFP− H12 cells resistant to HIV-1-reactivating compounds. At the moment, we study frequency of highly restricted viruses negatively selected from additional clones harboring HIV-1 proviruses with hypomethylated promoters. HIV-1 latency is compatible with various DNA methylation levels. We suppose that both extremes of methylation density can be selected in different experimental settings as a function of reactivation-proneness of latently infected cells. During the development of models of reactivable latency [37]–[40], clones harboring readily reactivable provirus have been selected from the population of cells following integration of the virus in the absence of viral gene expression (silent integration) [37]. As exemplified by the cell line H12, selection of such cell lines results in proliferation of cell clones with hypomethylated 5′ LTR and leaky control of provirus transcription. In inverse order to the events performed in previous works [37]–[40], we negatively selected from the population of cell line H12 the cells harboring a latent provirus resistant to reactivation. This procedure resulted in the outgrowth of cell clones with hypermethylated 5′ LTR and tight control of provirus transcription, exemplified by the cell line 2D12. It is possible that a similarly tight control of HIV-1 promoter reactivation by hypermethylation was necessary to select latently infected cells by silencing of actively replicating virus from chronically infected cell lines U937 and ACH-2 [55]–[57]. Indeed, HIV-1 promoter in these historically first described latent cell lines is heavily methylated [33], [34]. It is difficult to speculate about the exact transcriptional status of heavily methylated HIV promoters in aviremic patients and their contribution to residual viremia [58]–[64]. Their reactivation is probably a rare and stochastic event as suggested by the sequential homogeneity of virus rebounding during the short structured treatment interruptions [58]. While immunologic stimuli in vivo are adequate to overcome CpG methylation-mediated suppression of HIV-1 expression in virtually all patients who discontinued HAART, resistance of highly methylated HIV-1 promoters in memory CD4+ T cells purified from aviremic patients to reactivation ex vivo could be related to low HIV-1 DNA copy numbers in assayed aliquots. Our ex vivo experiments suggest that proviruses with densely methylated promoters coexist in some aviremic patients with latent but easily reactivable proviruses controlled by non-methylated promoters. In contrast to aviremic patients, non-methylated promoters present in viremic patients are expressed in the absence of external stimuli. HIV-1 was rescued from virtually all provirus-containing cells of viremic patients, without any evidence of DNA methylation. The non-methylated status of HIV-1 promoters in viremic patients might be further enhanced by the presence of unintegrated viral DNA, abundant during the viremic phase of HIV-1 infection [65]. Thus, the virus recovered from memory CD4+ T cells of viremic patients may represent, in addition to the product of integrated proviral genomes, also the product of pre-integrated HIV-1 DNA. We suppose that during the acute phase of HIV-1 infection accompanied by stimulation of the immune system [66]–[70], memory CD4+ T cells harboring reactivation-resistant latent HIV-1 that contained hypermethylated promoters have a better chance to escape from virus-induced cytopathic effects and cytotoxic responses than those infected with reactivation-prone hypomethylated provirus. Thus, the presence of hypermethylated HIV-1 promoters in CD4+ T cells of patients with long-term suppressed viremia could be the result of selection of proviruses with tightly controlled latency. In contrast, memory CD4+ T cells harboring reactivation-prone HIV-1 proviruses with hypomethylated promoters could be counter-selected by a virus-specific cytopathic effect and cytotoxic responses during perpetual stimulation of the immune system. Patients' cells analyzed in our experiments were sorted for memory, but not activation, CD4+ T phenotype. It is probable that the frequency of activated memory cells is lower in aviremic than in viremic patients and that the difference in the methylation pattern between both groups is strengthened by this effect. The multitude of mechanisms that control HIV-1 latency is a cause of our inability to purge the reservoir of latent HIV-1 in infected individuals. Methylation of the HIV-1 5′ LTR is an additional restriction mechanism, which controls resistance of latent HIV-1 against reactivation signals and thus determines the stability of the HIV-1 latency, although it is not required for the initial silencing events and it needs not to be reverted immediately during reactivation. Reactivation of HIV-1 latency in virtual absence of T cell activation by SAHA, an HDAC inhibitor already approved for use in humans, and strong synergistic effects between 5′aza-dC and other activators of HIV-1, may represent an important step toward the elimination of the latent HIV-1 reservoir. CpG methylation accompanied by repressive histone code seems to be the ultimate step in the development of the “locked” silent state of the provirus. The high stability of the locked silent state is, however, not complete. High but incomplete resistance of HIV-1 to reactivation represents a therapeutic challenge for the future.
  This study was conducted according to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki. Each patient provided informed written consent to participation in this study in accordance with institutional and regulatory guidelines. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Ambroise Paré Hospital. Seropositive individuals were selected for the study on the basis of at least two years of lasting infection and non-detectable plasma viral load during the last year (<50 HIV-1 RNA copies per milliliter of plasma as determined with Amplicore Ultrasensitive HIV-1 Monitor Assay; Roche Molecular Diagnostic System). Viremic individuals with plasma viremia from 6×104 to 1×105 RNA copies per milliliter of plasma were analyzed as controls. Patients' PBMCs (aliquots of 2×107 cells) were separated on Ficoll-Hypaque gradients. Memory CD4+ T cells separated from PBMC by means of a memory CD4+ T cell isolation kit (Miltenyi Biotech, France) were cultured at the concentration of 106 cells per milliliter of RPMI 1640 supplemented with 200-U/ml recombinant IL-2 (Chiron), 15% fetal calf serum, and antibiotics in duplicate in a total volume of 100 µl in the presence of HIV-1-reactivating agents. After a 3-day stimulation, CD4+ T cells were 10-fold serially diluted and co-cultured with PHA-activated CD4+ T cells from an allogeneic healthy donor, as described in detail previously [71]. HIV-1 replication was followed by determination of p24 in the cell-free supernatant by means of Genetic System HIV Ag EIA (BioRad France, Marnes la Coquettes). CD4+ T cells infected with HIV-1 NL4-3 or with HIV-1 AD8 were used as positive controls. Cell lines A2, A8, G10, and H12 were prepared by transduction of Jurkat cells with the HIV-1-based vector (pEV731 vector from the pHR' series) containing Tat and EGFP under the control of the HIV-1 LTR (LTR-Tat-IRES-EGFP-LTR), as described previously [38]. The JNLGFP Jurkat cell line contains multiple copies of integrated full-length HIV-1 provirus including the EGFP open reading frame placed between the env and nef genes [40]. H12 cells stimulated with TNF-α and PMA were separated by cell sorting of EGFP negative cells with FACSAria (BD Biosciences). To reactivate the HIV-1 provirus from latency, we treated the cell lines or patients' memory CD4+ T cells with 10-nM PMA (Sigma-Aldrich), TNF-α (Sigma-Aldrich) at 10 ng/ml, 1 or 5-µM 5-aza-dC (Sigma-Aldrich), 500-nM TSA (Sigma-Aldrich), 5-µM prostratin, 5-mM NaBut, 2. 5-µM SAHA, 0. 5-µM apicidin and 500-µM zebularine, or with their different combinations. We analyzed EGFP+ and anti-CD69-phycoerythrin-labeled (Becton-Dickinson) viable cells, negative for staining with Hoechst 33258 (Sigma-Aldrich) at 1 µg/ml, with LSR II and FACSCalibur flow cytometers, using CELLQuest and FlowJo software (Becton-Dickinson, Le Pont de Claix, France). EGFP+ cells were isolated using FACSAria cell sorter (Becton Dickinson). Aliquots, 200 µl each, of H12 cells diluted to the concentration of one cell per 2 milliliters were distributed into 96-well microtiter plates as specified in Protocol S1. Subcultures were expanded further. The samples of total genomic DNA isolated with the QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit (Qiagen Inc.) were digested overnight with EcoRI and prepared for methylation analysis as described by Hajkova et al. [72], or proceeded to methylation analysis by means of the Epitect Bisufite Kit (Qiagen Inc.). Bisulfite-treated DNA was amplified by means of PCR in a 50-µl reaction mixture containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 9. 2), 1. 75 mM MgCl2, each dNTP at 350 µM, and each primer at 45 pmol: MB (5′-TGGTAGAATTATATATTAGGGTTAGGGATT-3′, nucleotides [nt] 81 to 110, sense), MH (5′-CACCCATCTCTCTCCTTCTAACCTC-3′, nt 772 to 796, antisense) and MC (5′-AGAGAAGGTAGAAGAAGTTAATGAAGGAGA-3′, nt 161 to 190, sense); MG (5′-AAAAAACTCCTCTAATTTCCCTTT-3′, nt 663 to 686, antisense) or MF instead of MG (5′- AAATCTAAAAAATCTCTAATTACCAAAATC-3′, nt 577 to 606, antisense) for the HIV 5′ LTR. The sense primers contained T and the antisense primers A instead of C in positions complementary to non-methylable C (i. e. , C out of CpG dinucleotides). PCR was performed with about 50 ng of genomic DNA for 40 cycles at 95°C for 60 s, 58°C for 120 s, and 72°C for 60 s. Amplification products were cloned in the pGEM-T-Easy Vector System (Promega, Madison, WI) and sequenced. Only PCR clones with at least 95% conversion of cytosines outside CpGs were taken into account. The sequences of different HIV-1 LTRs amplified after bisulfite treatment of aviremic patients' DNA samples were clustered within each patient using the neighbor-joining method. The bootstrap support was very strong for the distinct clusters. All CpGs were masked for this analysis to exclude the differences in the methylation status. The Methylamp™ Global DNA Methylation Quantification Ultra Kit (Epigentek) was used according to the manufacturer' s instructions to quantify global DNA methylation of genomic DNA in H12 and 2D12 Jurkat clonal cell lines. ChIP assays were performed by means of the ChIP assay kit (Upstate Biochemicals, Temecula, CA). H12 and 2D12 Jurkat clonal cell lines were non-induced or induced with TNF-α (10 ng/ml) and PMA (10 nM) 20 min before ChIP assays. The analyzed cells were then cross-linked in the presence of 1% formaldehyde for 10 min at room temperature. Chromatin was sheared by sonication for 45 min in total (30 s ON, 30 s OFF) to obtain DNA fragments of about 200 bp in a Bioruptor (Diagenode SA, Liege, Belgium). The antibodies used for ChIP were as follows: anti-histone H3, CT, pan (Millipore-Upstate, Holsheim, France), anti-acetyl-histone H3 (Millipore-Upstate), anti-dimethyl-histone H3 (Lys4) (Millipore-Upstate), anti-trimethyl-histone H3 (Lys9) (Millipore-Upstate) and anti-trimethyl-histone H3 (Lys 27) (Abcam, Cambridge, UK). For the control, we immunoprecipitated the cell extracts using normal rabbit IgG (Millipore-Upstate) instead of hyperimmune antibody. Immunoprecipitated DNA was subjected to real-time PCR quantification using primers specific for the 5′ LTR (forward: 5′-TTAGCAATGTGTATGGGAGTTGA-3′, reverse: 5′-ATATCTTGTCTTCGTTGGGAGTG-3′).
summary: Despite the potency of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) to decrease the HIV-1 load and to reduce mortality due to HIV-1 infection, HIV-1 establishes latent infection resistant to host immune responses and antiretroviral therapy. HIV-1 latency is thus the main obstacle to the eradication of the virus from infected patients. CpG methylation is a mechanism which contributes to transcriptional silencing. The role of proviral DNA methylation in HIV-1 latency has not been clearly demonstrated and has never been studied in HIV-1-infected patients. We found in an in vitro model and in HIV-1-infected patients that CpG methylation of the HIV-1 promoter is important for the maintenance but not for the establishment of HIV-1 latency. We show that tight control of HIV-1 latency by CpG methylation could be a key barrier to purging the reservoir of latently infected cells in infected individuals. Although our study shows the difficulty in reactivation of HIV-1 with the heavily methylated promoter/enhancer sequences from latently infected cells, it also indicates that addition of some histone deacetylase inhibitors (namely suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, SAHA) and cytosine methylation inhibitors would represent an important part of HAART protocols in the future.
keywords: virology/immunodeficiency viruses
  molecular biology/dna methylation
  virology/immune evasion
  genetics and genomics/epigenetics
  molecular biology/chromatin structure
title: CpG Methylation Controls Reactivation of HIV from Latency