Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is a deadly vector-borne disease. Approximately 90% of Indian VL cases occur in Bihar, where the sand fly, Phlebotomus argentipes, is the principal vector. Sand fly control in Bihar consists of indoor residual spraying (IRS), the practice of spraying the inner walls of village dwellings with insecticides. Prior researchers have evaluated success of IRS-control by estimating vector abundance in village houses, but the number of sampling periods (n = 2–3) were minimal, and outdoor-resting P. argentipes were neglected. We describe a large-scale field study, performed in 24 villages within two Bihari districts, during which P. argentipes were collected biweekly over 47-weeks, in cattle enclosures, houses, and outdoors in peri-domestic vegetation. The objectives of this study were to provide updated P. argentipes ecological field data, and determine if program-initiated IRS-treatment had led to noticeable differences in vector abundance. P. argentipes (n = 126,901) relative abundance was greatest during the summer months (June-August) when minimum temperatures were highest. P. argentipes were most frequently collected from cattle enclosures (~46% total; ~56% blood fed). Many sand flies were found to have taken blood from multiple sources, with ~81% having blood fed on humans and ~60% blood feeding on bovines. Nonparametric statistical tests were determined most appropriate for evaluating IRS-treatment. Differences in P. argentipes abundance in houses, cattle enclosures and vegetation were detected between IRS-treated and untreated villages in only ~9% of evaluation periods occurring during the peak period of human-vector exposure (June-August) and in ~8% of the total observations. No significant differences were detected between the numbers of P. argentipes collected in vegetation close to the experimental villages. The results of this study provide updated data regarding P. argentipes seasonal abundance, spatial distribution, and host preferances, and suggest vector abundance has not significantly declined in IRS-treated villages. We suggest that IRS be supplemented with vector control strategies targeting exophagic, exophilic P. argentipes, and that disease surveillance be accompanied by rigorous vector population monitoring.
On the Indian subcontinent, researchers have made attempts to answer questions regarding aspects of P. argentipes field ecology, including: seasonality, spatial distribution, and host preference. Researchers have suggested that the abundance of P. argentipes is associated with ecological parameters such as temperature and precipitation [10]. Results of a more recent 12-month study conducted in three Bihari villages in the Saran district, during which 52,653 sand flies were trapped using light traps, suggest P. argentipes numbers are typically highest during the months when evening temperatures are warmest and precipitation is increased (June, July, August) and lowest during the coolest months (January, February, December) [11]. These results further suggested spatial distribution of P. argentipes was not limited to the inside of village dwellings, but also included outlying village vegetation. P. argentipes females are regarded as anautogenous, needing a blood meal to produce each batch of eggs [12], and results of several studies suggest they blood feed almost exclusively on bovines (cattle and domestic buffalo) and humans within rural villages [13–17]. Because P. argentipes is believed to be endophilic and endophagic [18], the vector control approach utilized for decades in Bihar has been indoor residual spraying (IRS), a method of applying insecticide to the inner walls of village houses and cattle dwellings. Explicit data addressing the impact of IRS on P. argentipes is limited [19–21] and, therefore, the impact of IRS on field populations is largely unknown. A cluster randomized trial was conducted by [22] in which IRS was performed in village dwellings in India (DDT), Nepal (alpha-cypermethrin), and Bangladesh (deltamethrin), during which pre-treatment light trap collections, performed over two consecutive nights in November, were compared with post-treatment light trap collections performed over two consecutive nights in April of the following year. One issue with this study design is the lengthy period (~5-months) between IRS treatment and sample collection, during which multiple factors could influence sand fly abundance. The authors mention other caveats as being small sample sizes within sites, limiting the reliability of site-specific analysis, and the fact that the study was conducted under controlled conditions not easily applicable in a national vector control program. Given the latter limitation, other researchers have collected P. argentipes from treated and untreated households during program-initiated DDT spraying in India [23–26]. While the results of these IRS-evaluation studies are interesting and useful, we would argue that they all share two limitations 1) a minimal number of post-IRS P. argentipes collection periods and 2) a universal neglect of outdoor sand fly population sampling. Post-treatment P. argentipes collections during the previously mentioned studies were typically conducted at ~1-month and ~5-6-months post-treatment. P. argentipes have been collected in large numbers from peri-domestic vegetation [11], and villagers sleep outdoors during warmer months [8] when vector abundance and biting rates are high [27]. Hence the exophilic, exophagic sand fly population should be monitored. Considering the sensitivity of vector abundance to environmental factors such as temperature and precipitation and the tendency P. argentipes to be captured in light traps positioned in vegetation and cattle enclosures [11,28–29], we suggest the current IRS-treatment programs could be better evaluated if P. argentipes were collected at greater frequencies and if trap locations were diversified to include cattle enclosures and outdoor locations such as peri-domestic vegetation. In this paper, we describe a large-scale, 11-month field study, conducted in 24 villages in two VL-endemic districts in Bihar, India, in which sand flies were collected using United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) light traps (Bioquip Products, Rancho Dominguez, CA, USA; John W. Hock Company, Gainesville, FL, USA) during 24 collection periods conducted over 47-weeks. The objectives of this study were to 1) provide updated P. argentipes ecological data within villages in two Bihari districts; and 2) determine if relative P. argentipes abundance in IRS-treated villages was reduced when compared with untreated villages. By utilizing methods previously described by [11] and [17], but using a much larger sample size, field-collected P. argentipes were used to estimate: spatial distribution (cattle enclosures, houses, vegetation), temporal fluctuations in relative abundance, and host preferences of blood fed females. Additionally, we used IRS data for the study villages to compare relative P. argentipes abundance in IRS-treated and untreated villages during the 2016 season. The results of this study will provide 1) useful, current ecological information regarding P. argentipes seasonal abundance, spatial distribution, and host preference in two VL-endemic districts; and 2) an alternative means of evaluating IRS-treatment through biweekly vector monitoring, helping to determine whether integrated methods of vector management should be recommended in Bihar.
The study was conducted in the Saran and Muzaffarpur districts of Bihar, India. Saran and Muzaffarpur are adjacent districts located ~30 km northwest (25. 8560° N, 84. 8568° E) ~60 km north (26. 121736° N, 85. 373700° E) of Patna, respectively. Summers are warm with maximum temperatures often ranging from 35–40°C. The winter months (December-February) are typically much cooler [11]. The rainy season typically occurs from July-September and April is generally the driest month. All villages were part of a large-scale VL-incidence survey performed in 60 villages within each district (n = 120) in 2015. At the beginning of 2016,12 villages in each district were selected for sand fly collection (n = 24) (Fig 1) with the aim of collecting sand flies from February-December. Prior to study initiation, it was discovered that two rounds of IRS application had been performed within several villages in both districts in 2015 and that application would be repeated in 2016. To evaluate the impact of IRS on vector abundance, we selected 8 IRS-treated villages and 4 untreated villages within each district (n = 16; n = 8) for CDC light trap collection. The main criteria for village selection were a population of >1,000 villagers, confirmed cases of VL spanning 2013–2015, and IRS-status (treated or untreated). All villages shared similar bioclimatic and agricultural characteristics. Livestock ownership was common with cows (Bos taurus, Bos indicus), domestic buffalo (Bubalus bubalus), and domestic goats (Capra aegagrus hircus) prevalent in each village. Dwellings were constructed primarily of thatch, mud, brick, and/or concrete, consisting mainly of human houses and cattle enclosures (cattle sheds, houses cohabitated by humans and bovine). At night, livestock were typically tethered to stakes, and were kept in rooms within cattle enclosures or outdoors adjacent to human dwellings and/or cattle enclosures. Local weather data including daily temperature (°C), relative humidity (%), and precipitation (mm) (February 10-December 31,2016) were collected from the closest, attainable weather monitoring station, located at Jay Prakash Narayan International Airport (VEPT) in Patna [30]. CDC light traps were used to collect sand flies in study villages. Twelve (12) CDC light traps were set, in fixed locations, within each of the 24 study villages (n = 288 trap-nights per collection week) biweekly from February 10-December 29,2016 (24 collection periods). During each collection period, CDC light trapping was performed over two consecutive nights with 12 villages being sampled on night-1 and the remainder on night-2. Collection was not conducted in January because adult sand flies are typically not active during this period [11]. CDC traps were set in randomly selected homes (n = 4), cattle enclosures (cattle sheds or dwellings cohabitated by bovines and humans) (n = 4), and outdoors in peri-domestic village vegetation (n = 4) to better estimate P. argentipes spatial distribution. Traps were identified by a unique code and waypoints taken with a handheld GPS (Garmin Etrex 30, Olathe, KS, USA). Traps were positioned with the fan ~1 m above the ground [11]. In peri-domestic vegetation, CDC traps were fitted with protective lids to shield the mechanical components from falling debris or rain. Traps were set at ~18: 00 and removed at ~06: 00 the following morning. Trap catches were individually numbered, transported to the laboratory in Patna, and frozen at -20°C until further processing. Because dry-ice was not available within the state of Bihar, we were unable to compare the efficiency CDC light traps with CO2 traps. Permission was received from village residents prior to conducting light trapping. Individual CDC light trap catches were uniquely numbered and identified by trap location and date of capture. Captured sand flies were separated from other arthropods, counted, identified morphologically by species, sexed, and females confirmed as unfed, blood fed, or gravid. If sand fly species was uncertain, specimens were placed under a dissecting microscope and identified morphologically by observing the male genitalia and the female spermatheca, the latter which required dissection [31]. Molecular species confirmation of sand flies was performed routinely on a random sample of specimens from each village. Whole sand fly DNA was extracted individually according to manufacturing instructions using the DNAzol reagent (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Individual sand fly DNA was amplified using forward primer 5’ -TCG AAT CTA TGG GTG GT-3’ and reverse primer 5’- CAC AAT CCC AAC CAC GAA G-3’ for the 18S rRNA target gene. Restriction endonuclease digestion was performed on the PCR product of 18S r RNA using HAE II and HAE III enzymes. Banding pattern after Gel electrophoresis confirmed the identification of P. argentipes [32]. After completing counts and identification, blood fed female P. argentipes were separated and placed into dry 1. 5 ml centrifuge tubes and stored at -20°C. Sand fly heads were removed from the bodies prior to analysis. DNA was then extracted from the abdomen and thorax of blood fed sand flies. The cytochrome b gene region (344 bp conserved mitochondria gene) was amplified using bio-tinilated universal primers designed earlier by [33]. Cow blood was used as positive control and sterile water as negative control. The amplified products were used in reverse line blotting hybridization as probes, followed by chromogenic detection. Immobilization, hybridization and detection were done according to methods of [33]. Previously developed source-specific probes for human, cow, buffalo, goat, and chicken were used to analyze the blood meal contents for the blood fed sand flies collected during this study. These techniques allowed for detecting multiple host species in a single P. argentipes blood meal. These procedures are described in detail by [17,33]. P. argentipes successfully analyzed by cytochrome b amplification and reverse line blotting were categorized by blood meal content (human, bovine, goat, etc.) and trap placement (cattle enclosure, house, vegetation). A Pearson’s chi square (X2) test was used to estimate dependence of blood meal content on the spatial distribution of blood fed P. argentipes (trap placement) (p = 0. 05). P. argentipes distribution was further evaluated by comparing the relative abundance of all P. argentipes within trap placements. Differences between and within trap catches in cattle enclosures, houses, and vegetation in Muzaffarpur, Saran, and cumulative districts were assessed using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) (p = 0. 05) followed by Tukey’s W procedure (p = 0. 05). To estimate relative P. argentipes seasonal fluctuations in abundance, we compared overall P. argentipes seasonal abundance in Muzaffarpur and Saran and compared seasonal abundance in cattle enclosures, houses, and vegetation within each district. More specifically, we compared the mean P. argentipes per trap-night per month (n = 11) and per collection period (n = 24) within districts and trap placements. A nonparametric Sign test (p = 0. 05) was used to estimate whether changes in monthly and biweekly abundance were significantly different between districts and between trap placements within districts. That is, whether P. argentipes abundance tended to increase and decrease in relative unison throughout the calendar year. The specific 2016 IRS spray dates for each village were provided by CARE India (Patna, Bihar) (S1 Table), written on the walls of the village dwellings by the applicators, and were also confirmed by the home owners. The inner walls of houses and cattle enclosures in IRS-treated villages had been sprayed with two rounds of alpha-cypermethrin (5%) wettable powder (WP) at a rate of 25mg/m2, and the dates of application varied on a village-to-village basis. The first round of IRS application ranged from April 1–May 30 in Muzaffarpur and April 6-June 2 in Saran (S1 Table). The second round of IRS application ranged from August 20-November 14 and September 15-November 28 in Muzzaffarpur and Saran, respectively. All IRS-treated study villages received two rounds of IRS application in 2015. None of the untreated study villages had received IRS-treatment in over three years. In response to insecticide resistance, alpha-cypermethrin (a synthetic pyrethroid) has replaced DDT in 15 Bihari districts [34]. Because CDC light trap collections were performed during on-going program-initiated IRS-treatment, we were unable to collect pre-treatment (baseline) data. We first compared the mean P. argentipes per trap-night per collection period (±SE) in IRS-treated and untreated villages within each district. We were specifically interested in differences occurring during the months with the highest relative vector abundance (June-August) and, hence, whether the first round of IRS application may have influenced P. argentipes abundance during this period of peak human-vector exposure. Nonparametric methods deemed sufficient for most skewed analyses [35], were considered most appropriate to analyze differences between IRS-treated and untreated villages. Hence, a Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to estimate differences in relative abundance of P. argentipes in IRS-treated and untreated villages (p = 0. 05) by district. One of the villages in Saran (CI-210), initially untreated during the first round in 2016, received IRS application during the second round (September 21), due to newly reported cases within the village, and therefore was excluded from the statistical analysis after September. We additionally excluded February and December from statistical analysis due to low vector abundance.
During 24 collection periods, occurring over 47-weeks (6,349 trap-nights), a total of 155,908 sand flies were captured, counted, and identified (S3 Table), of which 126,901 were P. argentipes (Males = 76,904; unfed females = 44,133; blood fed females = 2,299; gravid (no blood seen) females = 3,565) (Table 1). Individual trap-night yields ranged from 0–3,248 P. argentipes. A total of 76,516 and 50,385 P. argentipes were caught in CDC light traps in villages in Muzaffarpur and Saran, respectively. Twenty-four thousand two hundred eighty (24,280) Sergentomyia spp. and 1,477 P. papatasi were also collected. In total, 38,583 and 30,236 female sand flies were identified by dissection and PCR analysis, respectively (S1 Fig, S2 Fig). Three thousand two hundred twenty-four (3,224) female Grassomyia indica were also identified. Twenty six (26) females could not be identified. Of the 2,299 blood fed P. argentipes collected, a total of 1,583 were successfully analyzed using cytochrome b PCR and reverse-line blot analysis (Fig 2). Blood meal content consisted of human, bovine, and goat blood, exclusively. Approximately 60% P. argentipes blood meals were positive for more than one host species. Of all blood fed P. argentipes successfully analyzed, the majority were positive for human (~81%) and/or bovine (~60%) blood. Blood meal status was dependent on trap placement (X2; p<0. 0001), primarily in cattle enclosures. Overall, blood fed female P. argentipes were most frequently collected in cattle enclosures (~56%) followed by houses (~30%), and vegetation (~14%) (Fig 2). As would be expected, more P. argentipes containing bovine blood meals were collected in cattle enclosures (~56%) than in houses (~31%) or vegetation (~13%). But more P. argentipes containing human blood meals were also collected in cattle enclosures (~55%) than in houses (~31%). This greater dependence on cattle enclosures was observed in all P. argentipes blood meal content types except for mixed human, bovine and goat blood meals, which were collected primarily from houses (~50%), followed by cattle enclosures (~38%) and vegetation (~12%). The overall P. argentipes spatial distribution was relatively similar to that of blood fed females, with more being collected from cattle enclosures (~46%) followed by houses (~30%) and outlying vegetation (~24%) (Table 1). The mean P. argentipes per trap-night were determined to be significantly different between trap placements in Muzaffarpur (ANOVA; p<0. 0001), in Saran (ANOVA; p = 0. 0018), and in cumulative districts (ANOVA; p<0. 0001). Differences within trap placements were estimated between cattle enclosures and vegetation in Muzaffarpur (Tukey’s W; p<0. 0001), in Saran (Tukey’s W; p = 0. 0234), and in cumulative districts (Tukey’s W; p<0. 0001); between cattle enclosures and houses in Saran (Tukeys W; p = 0. 0020) and in cumulative districts (Tukey’s W; p = 0. 0015); and between houses and vegetation in Muzaffarpur (Tukey’s W; p = 0. 0397). The mean number of P. argentipes per trap-night per collection period in Muzaffarpur and Saran are indicated in Fig 6 and Fig 7, respectively. As noted, the first round of IRS applications was conducted between early April and late May to early June in both districts. Results of collections suggest that IRS-treatment failed to prevent the P. argentipes abundance in IRS-treated villages from increasing post-treatment June-August. Additionally, they indicate that if P. argentipes abundance was decreased in IRS-treated villages, the decrease was only temporary. In Muzaffarpur, the relative P. argentipes abundance per trapping period in IRS-treated and untreated villages were similar (Fig 6A). The most notable difference occurred during collection period-11 (June) in houses where the mean P. argentipes per trap-night in IRS-treated villages was markedly lower (Fig 6C). However, the mean was comparable to the untreated villages during collection period-12. In Saran, the mean number of P. argentipes in cattle enclosures suggested differences in P. argentipes abundance occurred in June (collection periods-9,10,11) (Fig 7B) but standard error was sizable because of outliers in one village (CI-210), particularly during collection period-11, and differences were less evident from collection period-12 onwards. Noticeable differences between P. argentipes abundance in IRS treated and untreated villages did not occur after the second round of IRS. Nonparametric means of statistical analysis were used to estimate differences in P. argentipes abundance in IRS-treated and untreated villages because of the large standard errors reported. In total, of 40 cumulative evaluation periods (20 collection periods x 2 districts) and 120 trap placement evaluation periods (20 collection periods x 3 trap placements x 2 districts), significant differences were detected for 8 periods (20%) and 10 periods (~8%), respectively (S4 Table). Of 56 evaluation periods occurring June-August, statistical differences were detected in 5 periods (~9%), 4 occurring in June and 1 in July. Significant differences were most frequently detected during analysis of cumulative trap placements (n = 8) followed by houses (n = 5) cattle enclosures (n = 4) and vegetation (n = 1).
We have collected abundant, contemporary ecological data from similar geographical locations in Bihar, which are suggested to produce more precise epidemiological models [60]. Our study is primarily an entomological field evaluation and in future studies the methods we implemented should be modified to include a baseline collection period and should be coupled with explicit epidemiological surveillance. Ecologically, our results suggest P. argentipes to 1) feed opportunistically on humans and bovines, 2) show a preference for cattle enclosures, and 3) be present outdoors in village vegetation. Because the majority of Bihari villagers sleep outdoors during periods when vector abundance is high, it is likely that many P. argentipes feed exophagically. This theory is supported by the lack of difference in P. argentipes abundance within IRS-treated and untreated villages, by previous field observations and blood meal analysis [11,17], and through observing P. argentipes infesting cattle during peak biting periods. Logically, IRS can only be efficacious in reducing endophagic vectors, which reinforces a need for supplemental vector control practices to reduce outdoor feeding populations. Because P. argentipes feeds heavily on bovines, endectocide-treated cattle may provide an appropriate means of reducing vectors unexposed to IRS-treated dwellings. By considering a complimentary form of vector control to better target exophagic, exophilic P. argentipes and by conducting explicit, frequent P. argentipes collection in combination with active and passive case detection, we could expand upon both integrated vector management and disease-vector surveilance, two of the main VL-reduction strategies discussed by the WHO [8]. As a result, we should be able to better protect outdoor-sleeping villagers and better estimate the sustainability of VL-reduction through program-initiated vector control.
Visceral leishmaniasis is a disease caused by a deadly vector-borne parasite (Leishmania donovani) transmitted to man by phlebotomine sand flies. Indoor residual spraying (IRS), performed within village dwellings, is the primary means of sand fly control performed in Bihar, India and more explicit methods of evaluating the success of control are warranted. A field-based study was conducted to collect ecological sand fly data for use in evaluating the effectiveness of IRS in reducing relative sand fly abundance. Results indicate that sand flies blood feed primarily on humans and cattle and are most frequently found within cattle enclosures. Results further suggest IRS-treatment has a limited impact on vector density. Our approach incorporates detailed evaluation of sand fly spatial distribution (cattle enclosures, houses, vegetation), seasonal fluctuations in abundance, host blood meal preferences within Bihari villages, and dates of IRS performed within treated villages. Hence, this study provides an explicit means of monitoring vector populations and evaluating control measures in Bihar.
invertebrates
livestock
medicine and health sciences
body fluids
ruminants
tropical diseases
vertebrates
sand flies
parasitic diseases
animals
mammals
diptera
neglected tropical diseases
infectious disease control
insect vectors
infectious diseases
zoonoses
phlebotomus
protozoan infections
disease vectors
insects
agriculture
arthropoda
eukaryota
blood
anatomy
physiology
leishmaniasis
biology and life sciences
species interactions
cattle
amniotes
bovines
organisms
Bionomics of Phlebotomus argentipes in villages in Bihar, India with insights into efficacy of IRS-based control measures