Oct4 is a widely recognized pluripotency factor as it maintains Embryonic Stem (ES) cells in a pluripotent state, and, in vivo, prevents the inner cell mass (ICM) in murine embryos from differentiating into trophectoderm. However, its function in somatic tissue after this developmental stage is not well characterized. Using a tamoxifen-inducible Cre recombinase and floxed alleles of Oct4, we investigated the effect of depleting Oct4 in mouse embryos between the pre-streak and headfold stages, ∼E6. 0–E8. 0, when Oct4 is found in dynamic patterns throughout the embryonic compartment of the mouse egg cylinder. We found that depletion of Oct4 ∼E7. 5 resulted in a severe phenotype, comprised of craniorachischisis, random heart tube orientation, failed turning, defective somitogenesis and posterior truncation. Unlike in ES cells, depletion of the pluripotency factors Sox2 and Oct4 after E7. 0 does not phenocopy, suggesting that ∼E7. 5 Oct4 is required within a network that is altered relative to the pluripotency network. Oct4 is not required in extraembryonic tissue for these processes, but is required to maintain cell viability in the embryo and normal proliferation within the primitive streak. Impaired expansion of the primitive streak occurs coincident with Oct4 depletion ∼E7. 5 and precedes deficient convergent extension which contributes to several aspects of the phenotype.
Oct4 is a homeodomain-containing transcription factor (TF) of the POU family required for pluripotency in ES cells and preimplantation embryos [1]. It has been extensively characterized in ES cells, and established as a hub of the signaling network that maintains pluripotency [2]–[5]. Embryonically, Oct4 is present in the developing zygote and down-regulated somatically between E7. 0 and E9. 0 depending on the cell type (see Supplementary (S) Figure (Fig.) S1 and S2 for detail) [6], [7]. After E9. 0 of murine development Oct4 is restricted to the germline, persisting until maturation of type A to type B spermatogonia in the male germline, in contrast to the female gametic lineage where it is depleted during meiosis (E14–16) before up-regulation as oocytes mature within primordial follicles [6], [8]–[10]. Several regulators of Oct4 have been established in vivo. Oct4 is maintained through the early stages of embryonic development by intercellular Nodal acting in part through Smad2 [11], [12]. Conversely, Cdx2 mediates repression of Oct4 in trophectoderm of the early blastocyst, while both Eomes and Gcnf mediate repression in the embryo after implantation [13], [14]. Oct4 buffers the ICM against differentiation into trophectoderm (the embryonic contribution to the placenta), but the proposal that Pou5f1 (gene symbol for Oct4) emergence relates to evolution of the mammalian placenta [15] is not supported given that Pou5f1 evolved before the origin of amniotes [16]. It is unknown whether Oct4 has a conserved role, or any post-implantation function in murine somatic development. Pluripotent somatic cells persist until E7. 5–8. 5 based on teratogenesis experiments [17], [18] and ∼E8. 0 based on epiblast stem cell (EpiSC) derivation [19], suggesting that Oct4 might continue to maintain pluripotency during this window of development. in vitro studies have also inferred many roles for Oct4 between the pre-streak and headfold stages, ∼E6. 0–E8. 0, including regulating neural versus mesendoderm differentiation [20], [21] as well as promoting cardiomyocyte [22] and neuronal differentiation [23]. However aside from maintaining the viability of primordial germ cells (PGCs), Oct4' s role in post-implantation development has not been characterized in vivo [1], [2], [24], [25]. The extent of Oct4' s function at the molecular level is also unclear. Physical interactions suggest Oct4 may have roles in chromatin modification, regulation of transcription, DNA replication and DNA repair as well as post-transcriptional modification, ubiquitination, and various other functions [2]–[4], [26], [27]. Oct4 both activates and represses transcription [28]. It binds thousands of sites in the ES cell genome, often co-occupying these sites with Sox2, Nanog, Smad1 and Stat3 [5]. The majority of genes occupied by several of these transcription factors (TFs) are active in ES cells, but their binding does not ensure expression [5]. Since Oct4 protein normally persists in somatic cells until ∼E7. 0–E9. 0 but Pou5f1 null embryos arrest at E3. 5, we asked what role Oct4 had later in murine development, using a conditional system to deplete it ∼E7. 5. We show that Oct4 depletion ∼E7. 5 results in craniorachischisis, random heart tube orientation, failed turning, defective somitogenesis as well as posterior truncation. The phenotype is not the result of a general delay in development, nor does it result from a failure in the pluripotency network present in the ICM. Depletion of Sox2, another core member of the pluripotency network in an overlapping window of development does not phenocopy Oct4 depletion. Instead, Oct4 is required until ∼E7. 5 to maintain cell viability in the embryo and proliferation in the primitive streak. In its absence, convergent extension is disrupted leading to several morphogenetic defects.
We used a conditional mutant of Oct4 to study its role after E3. 5 when it is essential for development. We used floxed Pou5f1 alleles (Oct4f) [25] and a tamoxifen inducible recombinase (CreERT2) that is ubiquitously expressed from the ROSA locus [29]. To establish the window of development during which embryos are sensitive to Oct4 depletion, we staggered the initial dose of tamoxifen with respect to embryonic maturity and administered a second supplementary dose 12 hrs later to enhance overall recombination efficiency. Oct4f/f; CreERT2+/− embryos administered tamoxifen ∼E8. 0 and ∼E8. 5 before analysis ∼E9. 5 did not have a phenotype (Table S1, row A (S1A), while tamoxifen administration ∼E7. 5 and ∼E8. 0 before analysis ∼E9. 5 resulted in a partially penetrant phenotype (Fig. S3; Table S1B). Unlike tamoxifen administration beginning ∼E7. 5 or ∼E8. 0, all Oct4f/f; CreERT2+/− embryos induced ∼E6. 0 and ∼E6. 5 before analysis ∼E9. 5 were amorphous, lacking structures aside from what resembled anterior neural head folds (Fig. S4; Table S1C). Tamoxifen administration ∼E7. 0 and ∼E7. 5 also led to a fully penetrant phenotype ∼E9. 5 (Table S1D). E9. 5 embryos administered tamoxifen ∼E7. 0 and ∼E7. 5 failed to turn, had severe posterior truncations, randomly oriented heart tubes, craniorachischisis (open neural tube along its entire length) as well as impaired somitogenesis (Fig. 1A–C). Such animals are referred to as Oct4COND MUT in the remainder of this report. The phenotype is not a consequence of tamoxifen administration, leaky recombinase activity prior to tamoxifen administration, or associated with recombination of a single Pou5f1 allele: no Oct4f/f embryos induced ∼E7. 0, no uninduced Oct4f/f; CreERT2+/− embryos, nor any Oct4+/f; CreERT2+/− embryos induced ∼E7. 0 had phenotypes ∼E9. 5 (Table S1E–G). Reducing the quantity of tamoxifen per dose administered ∼E7. 0 or failure to administer the second dose ∼E7. 5 led to incomplete penetrance of the Oct4COND MUT phenotype (Table S1H–J): 80%, 40% and 0% of embryos ∼E9. 5 exhibited the Oct4COND MUT phenotype when a single full, half, and quarter tamoxifen dose was administered ∼E7. 0 (Table S1H–J). This suggests reduced recombination with these lower tamoxifen doses. Collectively, these data support Oct4 depletion causing the Oct4COND MUT phenotype. To determine the time course of Oct4 depletion with this system, we compared Oct4 transcript and protein abundance between Oct4f/f and Oct4f/f; CreERT2+/− littermates administered tamoxifen ∼E7. 0. A single dose of tamoxifen was used to avoid a compound effect from a second dose. Relative Oct4 transcript abundance (Oct4f/f; CreERT2+/−/Oct4f/f; CreERT2−/− littermates) was significantly different 12 hrs after tamoxifen administration (ATA) (Fig. 1D; Table S1K; F5,13 = 15. 48, p<0. 05 1-way ANOVA, *p<0. 05, **p<0. 01 Bonferroni posttest). The fraction of cells in which Oct4 was detectable by immunohistochemistry was lower 20 hrs ATA, which is ∼E7. 5 (Fig. 1E, Fig. S5A–D; Table S1L; F3,10 = 12, p<0. 05 1-way ANOVA, **p<0. 01 Bonferroni posttest). A distinct primary antibody indicated that Oct4 protein was undetectable 24 hrs ATA in Oct4f/f; CreERT2+/− embryos (Fig. 1F, G; Table S1L). Since penetrance of the phenotype is complete when tamoxifen administration begins ∼E7. 0, partial when tamoxifen administration begins ∼E7. 5, and the fraction of cells with detectable Oct4 protein reduced ∼20 hrs ATA (following administration ∼E7. 0), these data indicate that Oct4 is required until ∼E7. 5. Oct4 depletion does not cause a global delay in development. Administering tamoxifen ∼E7. 0 and ∼E7. 5 to avoid partial penetrance, Oct4f/f; CreERT2+/− embryos were recovered in a ratio of 1∶1 with Oct4f/f littermates until E9. 5, but less frequently at E11. 5 (Fig. 2A; Table S1M–O). Features disrupted in Oct4COND MUT remained arrested in the mutants that persisted beyond E9. 5 (Fig. 2B, C), indicating that the Oct4COND MUT phenotype is not a global delay in development but disruption of select features. Indentation of the otic cup occurred and the branchial arches formed in Oct4COND MUT, events that normally occur by E9. 0. Forelimb buds also protruded in Oct4COND MUT as they normally do by E9. 5. Conversely, the neural tube normally closes rostrally between E8–9 and caudally by E9–10 (we refer to caudal and rostral neural tube closure with respect to closure point 1 at the hindbrain cervical boundary throughout; see Figure 2D) [30], turning normally occurs by ∼9. 0 and posterior extension normally reaches 21–29 somites by E9. 5 in WT embryos. These events always failed at E9. 5 when Pou5f1 excision was induced ∼E7. 0 (Fig. 1A–C; Table S1D; 26. 5 versus 4. 6 somites in Oct4f/f versus Oct4f/f; CreERT2+/− littermates). Additionally, heart tube orientation was randomized, 38. 6% of Oct4f/f; CreERT2+/− had situs inversus while the orientation of 6. 8% was ambiguous (Table S1P; p>0. 05 Chi-square test). The neuroepithelium of Oct4COND MUT embryos was also thicker in regions, particularly in the distal portion of the embryo (Fig. S6A–C; Table S1D; F1,287 = 94. 95, p<0. 05 2-way ANOVA, ***p<0. 001 Bonferroni posttest). These data indicate that Oct4 is required for posterior extension, turning, heart tube orientation and neural tube closure (NTC). Partial phenotype penetrance following tamoxifen administration ∼E7. 5 was used to assess whether the cause of disrupted features in Oct4COND MUT embryos were related. Coincidence of features in litters with incomplete phenotype penetrance suggests related causation of the coincident features. Craniorachischisis and posterior truncation coincided in all 23 of the 36 embryos analyzed (Fig. S2; Table S1B; p = 1. 64E-10, hypergeometric test). Conversely 2 turning defects in the 9 embryos where rostral NTC failed suggests independence of these processes, although the small number of embryos limits statistical power in this case (Fig. S3; Table S1B; p = 0. 72, hypergeometric test). These data suggest independent requirements for Oct4 in closure at closure point 1/posterior extension and rostral NTC. Craniorachischisis occurs when closure at closure point 1 fails (see Figure 2D). Convergent extension elongates the embryo in the anterior-posterior axis during gastrulation and neurulation, bringing the neural folds into opposition prior to adhesion at closure point 1. Failed convergent extension results in broad midlines and enlarged notochord diameter as both narrow during convergent extension. Oct4COND MUT embryos exhibit broad neural plates (Fig. 2H–J; Table S1D; F2,22 = 17. 42, p<0. 05 2-way ANOVA, **p<0. 01 Bonferroni posttest) and enlarged notochord diameter (Fig. S6D–F; Table S1D; p<0. 05, two-tailed student t-test). Concordance between posterior truncation and craniorachischisis, broadened neural plates, and broader notochords are consistent with deficient convergent extension. NTC rostral and caudal to closure point 1 occur by different mechanisms. Unlike the spinal region where expansion of paraxial mesoderm is not required for elevation and subsequent NTC, cranial NTC is initiated by expansion of underlying mesenchyme [30]. Mesenchyme density, including cranial mesenchyme, was reduced in Oct4COND MUT (Fig. 2E–G; Table S1D; F1,13 = 54. 59, p<0. 05 2-way ANOVA, *p<0. 05, ***p<0. 001 Bonferroni posttest). Hence expansion of cranial mesenchyme that is required for cranial NTC is deficient in the absence of Oct4. A requirement for Oct4 in extraembryonic tissue offers one possible explanation for the Oct4COND MUT phenotype: ∼E7. 5 Oct4 is present in extraembryonic mesoderm, allantoic angioblasts as well as extraembryonic endoderm which promotes proliferation and organization of the primitive streak [6], [31]. To test this possibility, Oct4+/+ Red fluorescent protein positive (RFP+) ES cells were aggregated with tetraploid Oct4f/f; Z/EG+/−; CreERT2+/− embryos, where ES cells contribute to the embryo, and tetraploid cells generate trophectoderm and visceral endoderm [32]. In this scheme, tamoxifen administration will selectively remove of Oct4 from the tetraploid extraembryonic lineages. Tetraploid Oct4f/f; Z/EG+/−; CreERT2+/− embryos induced ∼E6. 5 and ∼E7. 0 supported development of WT ES-derived embryos to E9. 5 (Fig. 3A–C, E; Table S1Q). Embryos were dosed on this relatively early schedule to avoid false negatives that might result from altered timing of development associated with transferring embryos to pseudopregnant mothers. In practice transferred embryos synchronize with the maternal uterine environment [33], suggesting false negatives for this reason are unlikely. Normal embryonic development after excision of Pou5f1 in trophectoderm and visceral endoderm suggests Oct4 is required in embryonic tissue. To identify non-autonomous effects of Oct4 depletion, we tested whether lineage-specific removal of Oct4 affected development of other tissues. Since Oct4 is present in the primitive streak, neuroepithelium and portions of mesoderm ∼E7. 5 as well as mosaically in definitive endoderm (Fig. S1 and S2), a primary effect in one of these lineages might non-autonomously cause other aspects of the Oct4COND MUT phenotype [6]. To test this possibility, Oct4 was removed in the neuroepithelium using Sox1-Cre, which is expressed and catalytically active from ∼E7. 5 [34]; in definitive endoderm using tamoxifen-inducible Foxa2mcm, which is expressed ∼E6. 25 [35]; as well as in embryonic mesoderm using Brachyury (Bry) -Cre, which is expressed and catalytically active from ∼E6. 25 [36]. Excision of Pou5f1 by lineage-specific recombinases (Bry-Cre, Sox1-Cre or Foxa2mcm) did not result in a phenotype or impact embryonic viability at E9. 5. Oct4f/f; Z/EG+/; lineage-specific Cre+/− embryos should reveal aspects of the Oct4COND MUT phenotype related to requirements for Oct4 within their respective expression domains or cause the embryo to resorb by E9. 5 if development is more severely impacted than in Oct4COND MUT embryos. Recombination at the lacZ/enhanced GFP (Z/EG) locus yields GFP expression, so the Z/EG allele was incorporated to gauge recombination efficiency [37]. Based on the parental genotypes used in the cross (Table S1R–T), a genotypic ratio where Oct4f/f; Z/EG+/−; lineage-specific Cre+/− embryos comprise ¼ of the progeny is expected if this genotype, where lineage-specific excision of Pou5f1 occurs, does not impact viability. Such embryos with no phenotype comprised ¼ of each litter (Table S1R–T). To test whether the lineage-specific recombinases yielded false negative results due to infrequent biallelic excision, we assessed the development of embryos where one Pou5f1 allele was removed prior to recombinase expression. Even with this sensitized approach, Oct4Δ/f; Z/EG+/−; lineage-specific Cre+/− embryos with no phenotype comprised ¼ of the progeny at E9. 5. This genotypic ratio indicates that excision of Pou5f1 by these lineage-specific recombinases did not impact viability (Table S1U, V). Since false-negatives may arise due to low recombination efficiency in this scheme, we used the GFP expression resulting from recombination at the Z/EG locus in Oct4f/+; Z/EG+/−; lineage-specific Cre+/− embryos as a proxy for recombination efficiency. By E9. 0 Sox1-Cre and Bry1-Cre induced >95% and >51% recombination within their respective domains (Fig. S7A–C; Table S1W–Y), while Foxa2mcm yielded <5% (data not shown). However, prior to E8. 0 when embryos are sensitive to Oct4 depletion, Sox1-Cre and Bry-Cre also yielded <5% recombination (Fig. S7C; Table S1Z, AA) [30]. Notably, the distribution of Oct4Δ/f; Z/EG+/−; Bry-Cre+/− cells did not appear altered ∼E9. 5 (Fig. S7D, E), suggesting that any effect Oct4 has on cell fate either coincides with lineage specification or precedes it. To investigate how recombination frequency influences phenotype penetrance in embryos where Pou5f1 is removed by lineage-specific recombinases, we generated diploid chimeras by aggregating WT and Oct4f/f; HisGFP+/−; CreERT2+/− morulas. The ubiquitously expressed fusion protein ‘HisGFP, ’ which is comprised of histone H2B and eGFP was used to mark transgenic cells [38]. Following tamoxifen administration ∼E6. 5 and ∼E7. 0, we recovered 16 chimeras where contribution by Oct4f/f; HisGFP+/−; CreERT2+/− morulas ranged from 20–60% (Table S1AB). 11 of these 16 embryos had no phenotype, while the remaining 5 chimeras had rostral NTC deficits (Fig. 3D, E). This indicates that Oct4+/+ cells rescue the developmental deficiencies caused by Oct4−/− cells in mosaic embryos. Since efficient depletion of Oct4 is required for the Oct4COND MUT phenotype, the inefficient recombination of Bry-Cre, Sox1-Cre and Foxa2mcm during the window of development in which embryos are sensitive to Oct4 depletion does not resolve whether Oct4 is ubiquitously required ∼E7. 5, required only in unspecified progenitors, or necessary in a subset of specified lineages, such as in specified Oct4+Bry+ mesoderm. Since this data suggested that differences in the kinetics of Pou5f1 excision with lineage-specific recombinases and CreERT2 (when tamoxifen is administered ∼E7. 0) are responsible for the absence and presence of phenotypes following Pou5f1 excision, we tested whether expansion of specified lineages was affected in Oct4COND MUT embryos. Lineage-specified Bry+ and Sox2+ cells were present 48 hrs ATA in Oct4f/f; CreERT2+/− embryos (Fig. S8A, B; Table S1AC). We quantified the fraction of phosphorylated Histone H3 (PH3) + cells in specified lineages. The PH3+ fraction of neural or mesoderm cells (Oct4f/f; CreERT2+/− versus Oct4f/f) was the same (Fig. S8C, Table S1AC). The data indicate that expansion of these specified lineages is not impacted by Oct4 depletion. To test whether disruption of the pluripotency network causes the Oct4COND MUT phenotype, we removed Sox2 using the same conditional approach [39]. Sox2 is a core component of the pluripotency network that complexes with Oct4, co-occupies many genomic sites (Oct4/Sox2) and is required for maintenance of Pou5f1 expression in ES cells. ES cells differentiate into trophectoderm when Sox2 is removed [40], however the ability of Oct4 over-expression to rescue pluripotency in these cells suggests that the critical role of Sox2 in pluripotency is to maintain Pou5f1 expression [40]. Sox2 null embryos lack epithelial cells typical of the epiblast and have a later extraembryonic defect which does not permit development past E7. 5 [41]. Following tamoxifen administration ∼E6. 5 and ∼E7. 0 to Sox2f/f; CreERT2+/− embryos [39], hydrocephalus was evident in 11/20 Sox2f/f; CreERT2+/− and 2/20 others had kinked neural tubes ∼E9. 5 (Fig. 4A–C; Table S1AD). Thus Sox2 removal did not phenocopy Oct4 depletion ∼E7. 5. These data do not rule out partial compensation for loss of Sox2 by redundant factors, however between E7. 0–E8. 0 Oct4 and Sox2 only overlap spatially in anterior neuroepithelium (compare Figure S1, S2 and S9) [6], [41]. The distinct phenotypes produced by depletion of Sox2 and Pou5f1 indicate that at least part of their functions do not overlap ∼E7. 0–E8. 0, in contrast to ES cells. Oct4 is reported to bind 784–4234 genomic loci in ES cells depending on the methodology used to map binding sites [5], [42], [43]. To determine which targets might be contributing to the Oct4COND MUT phenotype, we measured gene expression changes that occurred coincident with Oct4 depletion (∼E7. 5) and thereafter (∼E8. 0 and ∼E8. 5). Oct4f/f; CreERT2+/− embryos were separated from Oct4f/f littermates by genotyping extraembryonic tissue, and differential expression assessed within litters with ≥3 CreERT2+/− and ≥3 CreERT2−/− embryos (Table S1AE). RNA was extracted 24,36 and 48 hrs ATA, when Oct4 transcript abundance in CreERT2+/− embryos is <5% CreERT2−/− littermates (Fig. S5A–D). 754 unique genes were differentially expressed (p<0. 01) at one or more of these three timepoints. To determine whether the differential expression following Oct4 depletion was a direct consequence of Oct4 loss at its genomic targets, we assessed whether Oct4' s direct targets were enriched amongst up- or down-regulated genes as Oct4 both activates and represses transcription [28]. Systematic mapping of TF targets in early embryos is currently prohibitive [44], so a genome-wide binding map of Oct4 in ES cells was used [5]. This particular genomic binding map, which is based on ChIP-seq data, was used because it offers more complete genomic coverage than target maps based on ChIP-chip data, and also contained the most extensive set of other TF binding maps for additional analysis (alternatives include: [42], [43]). Enrichment of TF binding targets from ES cells amongst differentially expressed genes after ∼E7. 5 requires that binding sites be conserved between these stages. Oct4 binding sites from ES cells were enriched amongst up-regulated genes (Fig. 5B), supporting conservation of the binding sites between ES and ∼E7. 5–E8. 5 embryos. Oct4 binding targets were also enriched when alternative datasets were analyzed. For comparison, with the aggregate of differentially expressed genes (24,36 and 48 hrs ATA), enrichment using hypergeometric tests were: p = 3. 45E-11 [43], p = 2. 13E-08 [5], and p = 7. 36E-4 [42]. This suggest that the expression changes at these sites were a direct consequence of Oct4-mediated transcriptional regulation being removed after ∼E7. 5. Oct4 targets whose transcription is regulated by Oct4 in ES cells were differentially expressed coincident with Oct4 depletion ∼E7. 5. Lefty1 and Klf2 that are activated by Oct4 in ES cells decreased [45], [46], while Xist was notable among the most up-regulated genes following Oct4 depletion as it is repressed by Oct4 in ES cells [41]. An unbalanced male∶female ratio in the intra-litter comparisons, rather than Oct4 depletion, might explain the increase in Xist transcript abundance since embryos were not sexed in the microarray, however Quantitative (Q) -PCR on independent balanced comparisons confirmed that the increase related to Oct4 depletion. An intra-litter comparisons to match developmental stage, and inter-litter comparisons to reduce biological variance associated with comparing a small number of embryos both supported Oct4-mediated repression of Xist ∼E7. 5: Xist was 3. 20 times more abundant in the intra-litter comparison, and 2. 85±0. 76 s. e. m. more abundant in the inter-litter comparison of Oct4f/f; CreERT2+/−/Oct4f/f 24 hrs ATA (Table S1AF). Enrichment for genomic targets of Oct4 is expected with this approach, but transcriptional activators of Oct4 and proteins that physically interact with it were also differentially expressed. Ligands that maintain Oct4 such as Nodal and Wnt3a [11], [47] exhibit decreased transcript abundance coincident with Oct4 depletion ∼E7. 5, while transcriptional activators of Oct4 such as Sp1 [48] and Ago2 [49] exhibited increased transcript abundance, perhaps due to a feedback loop. Proteins that physically interact with Oct4 were also enriched amongst the genes up-regulated following Oct4 depletion (see Table S2 for cofactor identities; p = 1. 99E-08 24 hrs ATA, p = 1. 64E-05 36 hrs ATA, p = 5. 55E-07 48 hrs ATA enrichment using hypergeometric tests). Interestingly, we found considerable enrichment for Oct4 within genomic regulatory elements of these physical cofactors (p = 5. 34E-07 for 24,36 and 48 hrs ATA collectively using a hypergeometric test). This suggests that ∼E7. 5 Oct4 directly represses expression of a subset of the genes it physically interacts with in ES cells and that its absence triggers positive indirect feedback of the expression of others. Collectively, these data suggest that several regulatory relationships of Oct4 are maintained between preimplantation development and ∼E7. 5–8. 5. To test whether signaling networks other than direct targets of Oct4 might contribute to the Oct4COND MUT phenotype, we determined the transcriptional response that target sets bound by TFs other than Oct4 had to Oct4 depletion. The binding maps of 12 other TFs, and combination of several with Oct4, were assessed for enrichment amongst the genes differentially expressed after Oct4 depletion (Fig. 5A) [5]. Targets of c-Myc and Smad1 were enriched amongst genes up-regulated after Oct4 depletion [5]. Unlike c-Myc, which does not cluster at binding sites with Oct4 in the genome, Oct4 facilitates the binding of Smad1 such that they overlap at a subset of sites [5]. However up-regulation of Smad1 targets after Oct4 depletion occurred at sites Smad1 occupies independent of Oct4, indicating that enrichment of up-regulated Smad1 targets is not due to direct relief of Oct4-mediated repression at sites that the two co-occupy [5]. The enrichment of Smad1 targets amongst up-regulated genes that are not co-occupied by Oct4 are: p = 6. 14E-06 24 hr ATA, p = 4. 55E-03 36 hr ATA, p = 3. 53E-09 48 hr ATA (hypergeometric test). Like Oct4, Smad1 has been implicated in both activation and repression of target genes [50], consistent with a separate subset of Smad1 targets are de-repressed 24 hrs ATA. These data suggest that the absence of Oct4 yields a transcriptional environment conducive to target activation by c-Myc and Smad1. Conversely, enrichment of co-occupied Oct4/Sox2 target sites amongst down-regulated genes (Fig. 5C) suggests that Oct4 participates in transcriptional activation of these ∼E7. 5 and after. Since conditional removal of Sox2 and Pou5f1 do not phenocopy (compare Figure 1A to 4A), Sox2 is either not essential for activation of these sites, which is consistent with data from ES cells [40], or down-regulation of these targets does not contribute to the Oct4COND MUT phenotype. Oct4 binds thousands of sites in the genome, and it is unlikely that disruption of a single target gene causes the Oct4COND MUT phenotype. To relate molecular changes resulting from Oct4 depletion with the Oct4COND MUT phenotype, we determined which signaling pathways were disrupted coincident with Oct4 depletion and prior to the onset of the phenotype. Unsupervised clustering was used to assess the function of differentially expressed genes collectively. To discern primary effects of Oct4 depletion, we sub-setted for genes that are direct targets of Oct4 based on the ES binding maps [5], clustered these (Fig. 6A; Table S1AE), and then compared the clusters to global changes (Fig. 6B; Table S1AE). 3 of the 4 pathways showing the strongest enrichment in the set of direct targets also showed significant enrichment in the global set. Coordinate regulation of additional genes that are not targets of Oct4 within the same pathways as those directly regulated by Oct4, suggests amplification of the direct effects (Fig. 6A, B; Table S1AE). QPCR on independent biological samples confirmed a subset of changes from the global expression analysis (Fig. 6C, Table S1AG), supporting the reproducibility of the differential expression. Differential expression was then considered in relation to the Oct4COND MUT phenotype. The expression profiling suggested that decreased TGF-β signaling and increased nuclear import of NF-κB were primary effects as they occurred within hours of Oct4 depletion (24 hrs ATA) amongst direct targets of Oct4, while decreased Notch signaling and increased protein translation are other candidates that occurred later (Fig. 5A). The node is required to coordinate left-right asymmetry, specification of definitive endoderm and somitogenesis [51]. Given these roles in development, we considered the possibility that Oct4 was required in node formation a candidate that might explain the situs inversus, defective somitogenesis and the posterior truncation (via either endoderm specification or defective somitogenesis) observed in Oct4COND MUT embryos. Gene expression changes following Oct4 depletion also suggested the possibility of node malformation: decreased Dll1 contributed to the ‘Notch signaling’ enrichment in the microarray and was confirmed by QPCR in separate litters (Fig. 6C; Table S1AG). Decreased Dll1 following Oct4 depletion is relevant because loss of Dll1 was previously shown to disrupt node formation and cause defects in left/right asymmetry [52]. While these data were suggestive of a candidate mechanism underlying the Oct4COND MUT phenotype, the presence and appropriate localization of the node marker Chordin both 24 hrs ATA (Fig. 7A, B, Table S1AC) and 36 hrs ATA (Fig. S10A, B; Table S1AC) suggests that initial node specification occurs in Oct4COND MUT [53]. The disruption of left-right asymmetry is likely downstream of node specification, as transcript abundance of laterality specifiers that are asymmetrically distributed by the node during development is altered: Nodal, Dll1, Lefty1 and Lefty2 are decreased while Hand1 and Hand2 are increased. These data do not support the Oct4COND MUT phenotype being caused by a failure in Notch-mediated node specification. Contraction of actin-myosin microfilaments contributes to the morphogenetic processes of turning and convergent extension. A decrease in ‘actin filaments’ (p = 1. 88E-07) following Oct4 depletion (Fig. 6B; Table S1AE) suggests that actin networks are affected by Oct4 depletion. The distribution of actin appeared altered 24 hrs ATA with phalloidin staining (Fig. S10C, D; Table S1AC). Indeed the distribution of actin in Oct4f/f; CreERT2+/− embryos suggests that adhesion between anterior and posterior neuroepithelium in the distal portion of the embryo may contribute to thicker neuroepithelium in this regions and impaired embryonic morphogenesis. TGF-β signaling has also been implicated in several processes disrupted in Oct4COND MUT embryos: expansion of primitive streak [54], patterning derivatives of the anterior primitive streak [55], establishment of definitive endoderm [56], maturation of the node [57] and left/right asymmetry establishment [58], [59]. Unsupervised clustering indicates that Oct4 directly maintains TGF-β signaling (Fig. 6A). TGF-β signaling through Smad2 competes with Smad1 for the co-activator Smad4 [60], so up-regulation of Smad1 targets following Oct4 depletion may involve an increase in Smad1, expansion of the domain of activated phosphorylated-Smad1 (p-Smad1), or diminished competition from TGF-β-Smad2. Increased transcript abundance of Smad1 was confirmed by Q-PCR (Fig. 5C; Table S1AG). The p-Smad1 domain also appears altered 24 hrs ATA (Fig. 7C, D; Table S1AC). Variance in p-Smad1 introduced by differences in embryonic stage and ‘batch effects’ during detection prohibited making a statistically meaningful quantitative comparison of protein abundance between stage-matched Oct4f/f; CreERT2+/− and Oct4f/f embryos. Quantitative comparison with high-content image analysis software did suggest a difference in p-Smad1 abundance related to Oct4 depletion (Fig. S11), but this approach would require a considerable increase in sample size to test significance. These data suggest a direct effect of Oct4 depletion on diminished TGF-β signaling. Presence of Oct4 in the primitive streak ∼E7. 5 (Fig. S1), impaired axial extension in Oct4COND MUT embryos and differential expression of TGF-β signaling that is essential for expansion of primitive streak [54] suggested an effect on its expansion. An effect on the primitive streak and consequently its derivatives might have broad relevance: cranial mesenchyme supports NTC, while mesendoderm facilitates posterior extension, somitogenesis and turning. The frequency of cells undergoing apoptosis (Caspase-3+) in the Oct4COND MUT was increased (Fig. 7I; Table S1AC), suggesting that diminished cell viability might contribute to the phenotype. Notably, the distribution of apoptotic cells throughout the embryo, including regions where Oct4 is not expressed, suggests that some apoptosis may be a secondary defect. Conversely, fewer cells proliferated indicated by phosphorylated histone H3 positive (PH3+) in the primitive streak of embryos 24 hrs ATA (Fig. 7G, H, J; Table S1AC). To confirm the localization of these effects, we divided embryos into three segments (proximal anterior, distal and proximal posterior) and quantified the abundance of transcripts regulating apoptosis and proliferation. To obtain sufficient material for comparison, CreERT2+/−; Oct4f/f samples 24 hrs ATA were compared to CreERT2+/−; Oct4f/f stage-matched samples from separate litters. While there was no difference in the transcript abundance of apoptosis regulators Bax and Bcl2, a negative regulator of proliferation, Cdkn1c, which exhibited increased transcript abundance in the differential expression analysis was selectively increased in the posterior third of embryos coincident with the loss of Oct4 (Fig. 7K; Table S1AH). These data indicate that ubiquitous Oct4 depletion leads to increased apoptosis and deficient proliferation in the primitive streak.
∼E7. 5, Oct4 is still present in the primitive streak, posterior visceral endoderm, several mesoderm derivatives, neuroepithelium as well as extraembryonic endoderm and mesoderm (Fig. S1) [6]. Proliferation of the primitive streak decreases and apoptosis increases within the embryo coincident with Oct4 depletion ∼E7. 5, and by ∼E9. 5 several morphogenetic processes are disrupted: turning, posterior extension, laterality and NTC all are affected, demonstrating that Oct4 is required for somatic development after implantation. Reduced proliferation in the primitive streak coincident with Oct4 depletion suggests that Oct4 might maintain potency ∼E7. 5 as it does in the ICM [1]. EpiSC-derivation and teratoma assays support the persistence of pluripotent somatic cells ∼E8. 0, while lineage tracing indicates the presence of neuro-mesodermal progenitors ∼E8. 0 [61]. However excision of pluripotency factors Sox2 and Oct4 ∼E7. 0 do not phenocopy as their depletion in ES cells do [1], [40], indicating that the pluripotency network is altered between the ICM and ∼E7. 5. Differences in localization contribute: at the latest stage embryos are sensitive to Oct4 depletion and a proliferation deficit is evident in the primitive streak of Oct4COND MUT embryos (∼E7. 5), Sox2 transcript is limited to the chorion and anterior neuroectoderm (Fig. S9) [41]. Neural-specific Sox2 excision results in enlarged lateral ventricles ∼E19. 5 due to decreased proliferation of neural stem and progenitor cells [62], suggesting that hydrocephalus in Sox2COND MUT embryos may result from insufficient expansion/thickening of the neuroepithelium. This might render the neuroepithelium more elastic and distended as a result of the positive fluid pressure in the neural lumen [63], or precede the collapse or kinking of neural tubes that infrequently occurred. The differing phenotypes following depletion ∼E7. 5 indicate that Sox2 is not required for Pou5f1 transcription or as a cofactor in the processes disrupted in Oct4COND MUT embryos. Oct4 promotes mesoderm as opposed to neural fate during ES differentiation [20], as does XlPou91 (the paralog in X. laevis) in response to FGF [64], [65], suggesting that Oct4 depletion might divert mesoderm to neural tissue. Decreased expression of Tbx6 [66] and Wnt3a [67] whose loss is associated with diversion to ectopic neural tubes from paraxial mesoderm following Oct4 depletion is consistent with this possibility, as is thicker neuroepithelium of Oct4COND MUT embryos near closure point 1. However this differential expression may not reflect altered specification per se, but altered proportions of the embryo associated with defective axial extension. Similarly, neuroepithelial thickening unrelated to cell fate divergence is common amongst mutants with NTC defects such that this is not a reliable indicator of fate changes [30]. Finally, the distribution of Oct4Δ/f; Z/EG+/−; Bry-Cre+/− cells did not appear altered. This suggests that any effect Oct4 has on cell fate either coincides with lineage specification or precedes it. An alternative to an effect on cell fate specification is that Oct4 promotes expansion of unspecified progenitors by driving the cell cycle. Reduced mesenchyme density, decreased proliferation in the primitive streak, increased Trp53 (p53) expression and increased Cdkn1c expression in the Oct4COND MUT embryonic posterior all indicate that expansion of posterior progenitors is disrupted when Oct4 is depleted. The G1/S transition is effectively absent from ES cells, and binding of Oct4 to micro-RNAs that suppress inhibitors of the G1/S transition [68] may promote its bypass and limit the window for lineage-specific chromatin remodeling. Indeed, genes regulating ‘chromatin modification’ are up-regulated 24 hrs ATA coincident with reduced proliferation in the primitive streak (cluster 1–295: p = 2. 1E-04 and cluster 613–908: p = 3. 7E-04 using hypergeometric tests). Finally, c-Myc activates G1/S checkpoint complexes [69], [70], suggesting that c-Myc may be required to promote G1/S transition when the G1/S checkpoint is established coincident with Oct4 depletion. Morrison and Brickman proposed that the evolutionarily conserved role of Oct4 might be facilitating expansion of progenitor populations during and after gastrulation based on work with paralogs: Pou2 in D. rerio and XlPou91 in X. laevis [64]. These D. rerio Pou2 mutants [71] and X. laevis embryos treated with morpholinos against XlPou91 share posterior truncations [64]. Since Pou5f1 arose by duplication of Pou2 [64], these data support a conserved role for Oct4 in posterior extension, which in mice includes maintaining proliferation in the primitive streak.
All procedures were approved by the University of Toronto Animal Care Committee in accordance with the Canadian Council on Animal Care. Foremost, both euthanasia and surgery were minimized. When performed, stress was minimized to the greatest extent possible before rapid depressive action on the CNS during euthanasia. Minimally invasive surgeries were performed under anesthetic to achieve complete depression of feedback from the PNS and analgesic used for recovery. For staging, embryos were assumed to be 0. 5 days post coitum at 1pm on the day a vaginal plug was found. This is 12 hrs after the midpoint of the 14 hr light/10 hr dark cycle we used, where the lights were shut off every night at 8 pm and came on every morning at 6 am. Given the relevance of staging to this set of experiments, it is important to note that use of vaginal plugs –as opposed to direct observation of conception– is accompanied by ±7 hrs of variability in embryonic staging and is inferred from the midpoint of the dark period in the light/dark cycle. Embryos were dissected in Dulbecco' s PBS (Gibco) and immediately placed in either liquid nitrogen (for microarrays and QPCR analysis) or in 4% paraformaldehyde (for sectioning and immunohistochemistry). Dissections for embryonic stages that are whole numbers (e. g. E8. 0 or E9. 0) were performed between 9 and 11 pm, while those occurring 12 hrs apart from whole days post coitum (e. g. E9. 5 or E10. 5) were performed between 12 and 2 pm. For the experiments assessing the timeframe of Oct4 depletion (Fig. 1D–G, S5A–D), tamoxifen was administered at 9 pm±30 min, and dissections performed the indicated number of hours ATA, e. g. dissections for the time-point 3 hrs ATA were done at midnight (12 am). The following stocks were used in the study: CD1 (Charles River), Oct4f/f [25], lacZ/eGFP (Z/EG) [37], B6. Cg-Tg (Hist1H2BB/Egfp) 1Pa/J (Histone H2B/eGFP fusion ‘HisGFP’) [38], Bry-Cre [36], Sox1-Cre [34], Foxa2tm2. 1 (cre/Esr1*) Moon/J [35], Sox2f [39], CreERT2 [29]. Individual embryos or the associated extraembryonic tissues were genotyped as originally described. Because a variety of experimental permutations were used in this project, the details of each permutation, including the mouse strains, genotypic ratios, tamoxifen administration regimen and other relevant features are provided on a separate row in Table S1 (the relevant row is noted as the experiment is described where ‘S1, row A’ is ‘S1A’). Tamoxifen was administered according to the protocol optimized following CreERT2 development [29]. 99 mg of tamoxifen (Sigma) was dissolved by sonication in a solution of 100 ul of ethanol (Sigma) and 1 ml of peanut seed oil (Sigma) [29]. The solution was kept in a ∼50°C water bath during preparation and prior to administration to avoid precipitation. 50 µl doses of this solution were administered to pregnant mothers by oral gavage using a 250 µl gastight #1725 syringe (Hamilton) [29]. Because of the uncertainty associated with staging embryos with vaginal plugs (±7 hrs), the time-point (s) indicated for tamoxifen administration are approximations, and listed as such (∼) within the text to reflect this uncertainty. In practice, tamoxifen was given at 9pm±30 min (∼E6. 0, ∼E7. 0 or ∼E8. 0) or 9 am±30 min (∼E6. 5, ∼E7. 5 or ∼E8. 5). The time-point (s) when tamoxifen was administered for each experimental permutation are listed in Table S1 as well as in the figure captions. The density of mesenchyme, frequency of apoptosis and proliferation, relative abundance of transcripts (other than Oct4), distance between neural folds and thickness of neuroepithelium were compared using 2-way ANOVAs. Depletion of Oct4 protein and transcript were compared with 1-way ANOVAs. F-values from the embryonic genotype' s contribution (Oct4f/f versus Oct4f/f; CreERT2+/−) to variation are indicated except for Figure 7K and S6C where the intra-embryo segment contribution is reported (e. g. difference between segments in the same embryo). Binding enrichment amongst differentially expressed genes and common causality of disrupted features in partially penetrant Oct4COND MUT embryos was assessed using hypergeometric tests. The thickness of notochords was compared using a two-tailed t-test. A threshold of p<0. 05 was used for each test (ANOVA, hypergeometric and t-test). Please see the Supplementary Methods (‘Text S1, page 1’) for detail on how measurements of Oct4 protein depletion, mesenchyme density, neuroepithelium thickness, notochord thickness, distance between the neural folds, and the fraction of Ph3+, Caspase-3+ and Oct4+ cells were taken (‘Basic Measurements’). Images in Figure 1F, G; Figure 2 F, G, I, J; Figure 3A–D; Fig 7A–J; Figure S6A, B, D, E; Figure S7A, B, D, E; Figure S8A, B and Figure S10A–F were taken with a Zeiss Axio Observer, images of Figure S5A–D were taken with an Olympus Fluoview 1000, images of Figure 2 B, C and Figure 4A–C were taken with an Olympus SZ61, and images of Figure 1A–C; Figure 3SA, B and Figure S4A were taken with a Leica MZ16 FA stereomicroscope. Contrast of the images in Figure 3D, 4A and 4C was enhanced with Adobe Photoshop v12. Oct4 staining was performed as described previously [6]. For all other immunohistochemistry, embryos were fixed in 4% PFA overnight at 4°C, sectioned at a thickness of 10 µm and primary antibodies applied overnight at 4°C at the following concentrations: Oct-3/4 1∶200 (C-10 Santa Cruz), Chordin 1∶100 (R & D Systems), p-Smad1 1∶400 (Cell Signaling), Caspase-3 1∶500 (Promega), Ph3 1∶500 (Cell Signaling), Bry 1∶50 (R & D Systems), Sox2 1∶50 (R & D Systems). An antigen retrieval step of boiling the sample in 10 mM Sodium Citrate Buffer, pH 6. 0 for 15 min was used for Oct-3/4 (C-10 immunofluorescent) and Chordin staining. Phalloidin staining (Alexa Fluor, Life Technologies) was performed according to the manufacturer' s instructions. Hematoxylin and Eosin (Sigma) staining was performed according to the manufacturer' s instructions. Different litters from those used in the microarray analysis were used to confirm changes in gene expression by QPCR. Please see Supplementary Methods (‘Text S1, page 2) for assay details. Chimeras were produced as outlined in [72], and contribution was assessed by semi-quantitative PCR. Please see Supplementary Methods (‘Text S1, ’ page 2) for details. RNA was extracted with Trizol according to the manufacturer' s instructions (Invitrogen) and sent to the UHN Microarray Centre (Toronto, ON, Canada) for fluor-labeling (protocol GE2 v5. 7), microarray hybridization, and array scanning. Please see Supplementary Methods (‘Text S1, ’ page 4) for additional detail and analysis methodology. Please see ‘Text S1. ’ Please see ‘Text S1. ’ Please see ‘Text S1. ’ Please see ‘Text S1. ’ Please see ‘Text S1. ’ Please see ‘Text S1. ’
Embryogenesis is an intricate process requiring that division, differentiation and position of cells are coordinated. During mammalian development early pluripotent populations are canalized or restricted in potency during embryogenesis. Due to considerable interest in how this fundamental state of pluripotency is maintained, and the requirement of the transcription factor Oct4 to maintain pluripotency, Oct4 has been intensively studied in culture. However, it is not clear what role Oct4 has during lineage specification of pluripotent cells. Oct4 removal during lineage specification indicates that it is required in the primitive streak of mouse embryos to maintain proliferation. The consequences of Oct4 removal diverge from the consequences of removing another factor required for pluripotency between preimplantation development and early cell fate specification suggesting that the network Oct4 acts within is altered between these stages.
Oct4 Is Required ∼E7.5 for Proliferation in the Primitive Streak