This review was first posted on http://www.rubysreads.com. 
 I was completely psyched to get on a book tour list for this book, which is why I'm sorry to say that I hated this volume. It's not because of anything Andrea Cremer did, exactly, but simply that I fell on the wrong side of the love triangle. Though I love books with love triangles, they really only work for me if I know the outcome. Otherwise, if I get "invested" in the wrong person, my disappoint ruins the whole book for me. I had some suspicions when I finished the first book, but I was not without hope that things would end as I wanted them to. I really should have cut my losses, or I wouldn't be suffering from the too-hard-shake-book-blues. Right now, I don't think I'll read Bloodrose when it comes out. But--if I do--I'll definitely be peeking at the last chapter first. 
 Aside from the fact that I wish that I didn't get so invested in the romantic storylines of the books I read, Wolfsbane didn't do much for me. However, I want to make it clear: If I don't like the romance, there's nothing the author can do to make the rest of the book work for me. Authors take risks when they decide to go with love triangle storylines. They'll lose a portion of their audience no matter who the MC ultimately chooses. It was my bad luck to be on the losing side this time around. 
 Because I feel like I've totally failed as a reviewer for this book, I'd appreciate it if you'd check out the rest of the reviews on this book tour. Hopefully they can give you a more balanced review of this book. I haven't read them yet, because it's my policy not to read reviews of books until after I've posted my own. So far, there are three: 
 1. Karissa's Reading Review 
 2. Mary at Book Hounds 
 3. Yani at Avid Reader 
 As always, I really, really appreciate feedback. I'd love to discuss the effect of love triangles, as pertains to Wolfsbane, in general, the merits of Shay v. Ren, anything. This is an issue worth discussing.