There are two things I have to admit. 
 1- I was extremely excited when I was approved to receive an advanced reader copy of this book. It seemed to have all the elements that interest me: Epic Fantasy. Dark. Intriguing premise. The main character did sound strangely YA but... It was still a Dark, Adult Fantasy after all. 
 2-I DNF'ed this book. I tried so hard not to, but it started to become a struggle to go through the pages. The fact that the book is extremely long helped too. I can't remember the last time I have given up on a book, simply because it hurts me to do this. There's always the feeling I could be missing out on something . Or even be terribly unfair - what if the book gets awesomely extraordinary near the end? But the thing is... Even though I mention some technical aspects in all my reviews, the final rating is always based on how much I've enjoyed a certain book. Therefore, you can understand why I have to give 1 unfortunate star to Nevernight. I spend time on a book from the very first page - this is when the story begins, and this when the book has to get my attention. I have to start enjoying a book from the very beginning. Not from the middle. Not near the end. 
 So, as the French say, you have to 'call a cat a cat' (100% pun intended). 
 THE PLOT 
 The plot, which plot? If you hadn't read the book blurb, then you wouldn't even have a clue of what the main plot is until after you've gone through several pages. This made me really sad, because I thought this book had so much potential. So much creativeness had clearly been put into the world-building aspect. Then, when I started actually reading it, it just didn't deliver. 
 The pacing was off. And so the timeline. Why sacrifice chronological order for the sake of nothing, since you are going to incorporate flashbacks straight away, without even much of foreshadowing? So many questions, so little answers. Literally. 
 THE CHARACTERS 
 Sadly, I couldn't feel much for the characters. Their feelings were narrated passively, from a cold and distant perspective. That is, if the main character had feelings at all. 
 THE WRITING STYLE 
 I'd like to believe that this was the main issue I've had with the book. Maybe if the writing approach had been different, who knows, I might have found myself actually enjoying the story? 
 In the beginning, I thought everything sounded beautiful, even poetic. The parallelism between scenes, the epic and cold tone, even the footnotes. Until it became too much. It would have worked well as a prologue, maybe. But as if it was not enough to put the readers under the pressure of a very confusing first scene and thrown into a world that is mostly explained via footnotes; then there's also the fact that this would be a pattern throughout the rest of the book. 
 The metaphors? Too much. 
 Use of passive voice? Too much. 
 The footnotes? Too much. First impression was that they could have added a special touch if they have been done differently. When these footnotes started acting more like an 'info-dump' aid rather than comic relief, they became an extra distraction that'd pull me out of the main plot (as if finding the main plot wasn't hard enough on its own...) 
 Accents and dialects in writing? I am not a fan. I just am not, this might be my issue, I don't know. I like to read words that are written as they are supposed to - in plain English. Having to read phonetic spelling simply breaks the flow. 
 Do not get me wrong, the author has a very specific style. The tone is 'epic' in some way. It could have worked. 'O, it could'. But it just became too much at some point. 
 -- 
 Overall, I felt Nevernight wasted its potential due mostly to the writing style and writing approach. Should it had not been such a struggle to follow the story smoothly, I would be probably saying wonders about the book now. 
 -- 
 This review has been published here 
 http://www.nyareads.com/2016/08/09/re...