Originally Posted On The Sassy Book Geek 
 Well I certainly have a lot of weird feelings about this book, it was very unique and a little...odd at the same time. On one hand I really liked it but on the other hand it was kind of a mess for me to read through. 
 One BIG plus for this book is that it's a standalone. Yay, no waiting for sequels! 
 Let's Talk About The Plot 
 This is supposed to be a sort of retelling of Red Riding Hood but it really isn't, sure the prologue practically SCREAMS of it but the rest of the book is very loosely based on the fairy tale. Mostly the book revolves around Hodge's take on certain French folktales and mythology of her own making. So I would say the theme of Red Riding Hood is apparent throughout but this does not follow the original very closely. 
 As far as the story-line goes it was very intriguing, the world building and mythology Hodge created were on point. I loved hearing the legends and folktale-ish stories scattered throughout the book.On the downside, though, I found the world building lacking at the same time. Sure it was fascinating and I wanted to know more, but that's just it...I wanted to know more. The world is pretty confusing in the sense that nothing is every explained enough, I found myself asking the question "Why?" a lot. Don't get me wrong I loved the creativity but it was just a little too unexplained and confusing for my tastes. 
 "Crimson Bound" is also quite dark, creepy, and twisted. This is definitely not your grandmother's fairy tale. It's a gory, violent, and our characters are flawed and selfish. This is an aspect I adored while reading, I loved how dark the setting and characters were, it's something I feel we rarely see in YA books. 
 The pacing did get a little wonky throughout, one thing I dislike in a book is slow pacing or pacing that rockets back and forth. "Crimson Bound" is the latter. One minute I'd be super interested in what would happen, since this book is full of twists and turns. The next minute I'd be so bored to death I thought about DNFing it. I feel like I got whiplash from this pacing tug-of-war. I think the plot kept it fast but the characters really bogged it down, but we'll get to them. 
 Rosamund Hodge's writing is lovely, it was definitely this book's highest point. Seriously, A+ for the writing. 
 Let's Talk About The Characters 
 I can honestly say I didn't really care any of them, I sort of enjoyed and liked them but mostly I'm "meh" about it. As I said earlier they are all flawed, dark, and selfish characters. Usually dark characters would be right up my alley but in this case they fell extremely short. The characters all felt very shallow and flat, none of them were interesting or relatable. 
 Rochelle is the MC and while I really liked that she was portrayed as being flawed and selfish and more or less evil, I didn't think she was a great character. We spend A LOT of time inside her thoughts, and honestly, they were extremely boring., her "voice" in this book was boring, everything about her bored me. She could have been badass since that was pretty much Hodge's whole goal, but she was so.....dull. 
 The ONLY other characters that had even an ounce of development would be the Erec and Armand, who were far more interesting than our MC, in my opinion. Honestly, Armand was the only character I really liked. Erec could have been a little more likable if I actually understood him (when you read this, you'll know what I mean), I never figured out what the hell his exact motives were. (This is where the unexplained things I talked about earlier come in). 
 The secondary characters were kind of a joke in my opinion, they were completely one dimensional. NO development whatsoever. They were there when the plot needed a boost but other than that, they could have not existed and the story would function just fine. 
 Yet I still found the main characters all interesting and likable enough to finish the book. Confusing, yes? 
 Let's Talk About The Romance 
 I have a lot of confused feelings about the romance in "Crimson Bound", on one hand I shipped the shit out of Armand and Rochelle and I loved them as a couple. I really did. However much I did like them together though, their romance wasn't really full of chemistry. AND. There's a love triangle, I very frustrating and evil love triangle. 
 Normally I would say we could have done without it but it turns out being quite relevant to the plot and therefore I can forgive it. However, I really hated Erec and Rochelle's "relationship". I would LOVE to rant and go into details but unfortunately I cannot due to spoilers. I can say that Erec's love isn't...healthy and that's why I hated that end of the love triangle. 
 In Conclusion 
 Like I said I have a lot of confused feelings, I've been back and forth on a rating (2 or 3?) for a while. Overall, I decided I did like the mythology and the concept of the story itself more than I disliked all of of the things I complained about. I realize that there are a lot of negatives but I really did enjoy the book for the most part. 
 Recommend? 
 I would recommend this for the most part, although I have no idea to whom I would. I know for sure I wouldn't recommend it to anyone looking for a close retelling of Red Riding Hood, and I wouldn't recommend it for anyone who is leery of gore, violence, and dark atmospheres.