Interesting. 
 I read this play as I'm considering taking part in the production and I really enjoyed it. 
 In the 12 angry men, you see all the different types of people. You have juror 8, who stood against all the others, did not give in to peer pressure and stood his ground. On the other hand of the spectrum, we have juror 3, a bitter, stubborn and biased man. 
 The play has a very strong message. It's so easy to condemn and judge someone from the safety of our comfortable jury rooms/homes/offices. We're so quick to say "Guilty" with just a few weak evidences because it's the simple easy way out. Especially when subjected to the pressure of society. If society condemns something, then why should we fight it? Most of the jurors in the room where not sure about guilty. However, they raised their hands anyway when they saw that others where doing the same. 
 I like juror 8. He swam against the current even under threat of drowning and ended up creating his own current. Down with the System!