Attorney General William Barr testified Wednesday before the Senate Judiciary Committee and faced questions over the handling of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia report and accusations from Democrats that he sought to present the investigation’s findings in President Trump's favor. Barr was grilled over a Washington Post article that said Mueller contacted Barr to express concerns about the public summary his office put out in March. Mueller made clear he did not feel Barr’s summary was inaccurate, according to The Post and the Justice Department. Rather, Mueller told Barr that media coverage of the letter had “misinterpreted” the results of the probe concerning the obstruction of justice aspect. The hearing provided the attorney general his most extensive opportunity yet to explain the department’s actions. On Thursday, Barr is slated to testify before the House Judiciary Committee regarding the report. Follow Fox News' live blog below. Mobile users click here.<doc-sep>Attorney General William Barr, in highly anticipated Senate testimony Wednesday, revealed tensions between the Justice Department and Robert Mueller’s team over the special counsel’s final report on the Russia investigation, pointedly saying he was surprised Mueller didn’t come to a conclusion over whether President Trump obstructed justice. “We did not understand exactly why the special counsel was not reaching a decision,” Barr told the Senate Judiciary Committee. Barr later released his own letter saying he determined, from Mueller’s investigation, that obstruction charges against Trump were not warranted -- a decision that exposed him to harsh criticism from Democrats. MUELLER LETTER TO BARR ON RUSSIA REPORT But Barr suggested Mueller should have taken a stance on the issue: “We don’t conduct criminal investigations just to collect information and put it out to the public. We do so to make a decision.” Barr also defended his decision to release a summary of Mueller’s findings initially, before later releasing a redacted version of the report. He suggested the full report would have been released sooner, if Mueller’s team had cooperated with their request to identify sensitive grand jury material from the start. “Unfortunately, it did not come in that form,” Barr said. “And it quickly became apparent that it would take about three or four weeks to identify that material and other material that had to be redacted. So there was necessarily going to be a gap between the receipt of the report and getting the full report out publicly.” Barr on Wednesday also stressed that Mueller did not accuse him of misrepresenting his findings. He defended his actions in light of a newly released letter from the special counsel indicating Mueller had concerns Barr's summary did not fully capture the "context, nature, and substance" of his office's work. Barr testified that during a subsequent phone call, Mueller said he was not calling his summary inaccurate but was concerned about the press reporting on it. “He was very clear with me that he was not suggesting we had mispresented his report,” Barr said. The revelation of the Mueller letter quickly fueled a partisan firestorm in the run-up to Wednesday's hearing, with House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff saying Barr should resign and other Democrats blasting Barr for his handling of the report. During the hearing, Illinois Democratic Sen. Dick Durbin took issue with Barr's claim that Mueller didn't find the summary inaccurate, telling the attorney general that attorneys don't put things in writing "unless it's very important." One Democrat, Connecuticut Sen. Dick Blumenthal ripped into Barr, telling him, "I think history will judge you harshly and a bit unfairly and I think you're the fall guy for this report." Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham pushed back against the argument embraced by Democrats that Trump obstructed justice in the Mueller probe, through his firing of then-FBI Director James Comey and other actions. Graham argued the president could not have obstructed justice – since Mueller found there was no underlying crime by Trump associates of coordinating with the Russians in the 2016 election. "Was there an underlying crime here?" Graham asked. "No," Barr replied. SCHIFF CALLS ON BARR TO RESIGN AS REPORTED MUELLER CONCERNS FUEL DEM OUTRAGE “You have to have specific intent to obstruct justice,” Graham also said. “If there’s no underlying crime, pretty hard to figure out what intent might be if there was never a crime to begin with. The president never did anything to stop Mueller from doing his job.” Durbin, though, referenced the finding in Mueller's report that White House counsel Don McGahn refused to follow orders from the president to fire Mueller. "I think it's clear Trump wanted this to end," Durbin said. "Over and over again this president was very clear." Graham, a South Carolina Republican, also zeroed in on concerns that the early days of the FBI's Russia investigation were tainted by law enforcement bias against Trump. He read aloud text messages between two FBI employees, Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, disparaging Trump. “When the Mueller report is put to bed and it soon will be, this committee is going to look long and hard on how this all started,” Graham said. Missouri Republican Sen. Josh Hawley also lambasted the text messages between Page and Strzok, telling Barr, "That's why we're sitting here today. An unelected official in this government has open disdain for Trump voters then try to overturn the results of a Democratic election. That's the story here today. I can't believe a top official would try to exercise their own prejudices. That's the real crisis here." Barr told the panel he’s actively looking into the origins of the Russia probe, saying he’s working with FBI Director Chris Wray “to reconstruct what went down.” Some Democrats expressed frustration over questions from Republicans relating to the FBI's investigation of Hillary Clinton and her email server during the 2016 campaign. Graham asked Barr if he has "a problem" with how Comey, the former FBI director, handled the Clinton case. Barr replied yes. "It does not represent what Americans want to hear today," Durbin said. In her opening statement, Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein, the top Democrat on the committee, called for Mueller to testify himself. Barr said he has no problem with Mueller testifying. Fox News has obtained a copy of the letter, in which Mueller pushed Barr to release the executive summaries written by the special counsel's office. At the beginning of the hearing, Graham asked that the letter be added to the record. Barr's appearance before the Senate Judiciary Committee provided the attorney general his most extensive opportunity yet to explain the department's actions, including a press conference held before the report's release, and for him to confront head-on the allegations that he's sacrificed his integrity to become the president's protector. Barr is also separately invited to appear on Thursday before the Democratic-led House Judiciary panel, but the Justice Department said he would not testify if the committee insisted on having its lawyers question the attorney general, instead of members of Congress. Fox News’ Gregg Re and The Associated Press contributed to this report.<doc-sep>He says this is true because “Mr. Trump eats your soul in small bites.” He describes how Trump first lies privately, in an unending stream of talk, while his aides remain silent and thus complicit. Later, he writes, Trump requires acts of public fealty. He suggests (though does not state outright) that he himself fell prey to Trump’s pressure before he was fired as FBI director in May 2017 — failing to correct him in private or adequately defend institutions he had held dear while Trump attacked them publicly. He notes that many who work for Trump secretly believe that “in a time of emergency, with the nation led by a deeply unethical person,” they must find a way to remain in their jobs, playing a “long game for your country, so you can pull it off, where lesser leaders have failed and gotten fired by tweet.”<doc-sep>Attorney general William Barr will appear this morning before the Senate Judiciary Committee to testify about special counsel Robert Mueller’s report on Russian meddling in the 2016 US presidential election and suspected ties to the Trump campaign. Barr’s testimony, scheduled to begin at 10am US Eastern time, comes the day after news that Mueller objected to Barr’s summary of his investigation as lacking crucial context. How to watch Barr’s testimony online Republicans lead the Judiciary Committee chaired by Lindsey Graham. He and other GOP senators are expected to focus less on contradictions between Barr’s four-page summary and the full Mueller report and more on the beginnings of the Russia probe itself, which they have characterized as improper. Democrats are expected to focus on Barr’s summary and announcement of the report’s findings, which they say he mischaracterized, and how he described Mueller’s conclusions on whether Trump obstructed justice.<doc-sep>
Sen. Kamala Harris, a Democratic presidential candidate, accused Attorney General William Barr of failing to look at evidence before making a decision on obstruction of justice. Harris grilled Barr on statements he made in his March 24 summary, saying he and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein had looked at the evidence in special counsel Robert Mueller's report before reaching their decision on obstruction of justice. In his letter, Barr said he found the evidence was not sufficient to establish that the President committed obstruction of justice. But Harris questioned whether Barr had personally reviewed the special counsel's "great deal of evidence." She then asked, "My question is in reaching your conclusion, did you personally review all of the underlying evidence?" Barr responded, "No," adding that he "accepted the statements in the report as the factual record." Here's a portion of Harris' questioning: Harris: "As the attorney general of the United States, you run the United States Department of Justice. If in any US attorney's office around the country, the head of that office, when being asked to make a critical decision about, in this case, the person who holds the highest office in the land, and whether or not that person committed a crime, would you accept them recommending a charging decision to you if they had not reviewed the evidence?" Barr: "Well, that’s a question for Bob Mueller. He’s the US attorney. He’s the one who presents the report." Harris: "But it was you who made the charging decision, sir." Barr: "What --" Harris: "You made the decision not to charge the President." Barr: "No -- in the [sic] memo, and in the declination memo --" Harris: "You said it was your baby, what did you mean by that?" Barr: "It was my baby to decide whether or not to disclose it to the public." Harris: "And whose decision was it -- who had the power to make the decision about whether or not the evidence was sufficient to make a determination of whether there had been an obstruction of justice?" Barr: "Prosecution memos go up to the supervisor, in this case, it was, you know, the attorney general and the deputy attorney general, who decide on the final decision. And that is based on the memo as presented by the US attorney's office" Harris: "I think you’ve made it clear that you have not looked at the evidence. We can move on. I think you’ve made it clear sir that you’ve not looked at the evidence, and we can move on."