Thinking is for Doing.Humans caninferother people’s mental states from observations–an ability called Theory-of-Mind (ToM) –and subsequentlyactpragmatically on those inferences.
Existing question answering benchmarks such as ToMi ask models questions to makeinferencesabout beliefs of characters in a story, but do not test whether models can then use these inferences to guide theiractions.
We propose a new evaluation paradigm for large language models (LLMs) :Thinking for Doing (T4D) , which requires models to connect inferences about others’ mental states to actions in social scenarios.
Experiments on T4D demonstrate that LLMs such as GPT-4 and PaLM 2 seemingly excel at tracking characters’ beliefs in stories, but they struggle to translate this capability into strategic action. Our analysis reveals the core challenge for LLMs lies in identifying the implicit inferences about mental states without being explicitly asked about as in ToMi, that lead to choosing the correct action in T4D.
To bridge this gap, we introduce a zero-shot prompting framework,Foresee and Reflect(FaR) , which provides a reasoningstructurethat encourages LLMs to anticipate future challenges and reason about potential actions.
FaR boosts GPT-4’s performance from 50% to 71% on T4D, outperforming other prompting methods such as Chain-of-Thought and Self-Ask.
Moreover, FaR generalizes to diverse out-of-distribution story structures and scenarios that also require ToM inferences to choose an action, consistently outperforming other methods including few-shot in-context learning.