Model-based evaluation is at the heart of successful model
development –
as a reward model for training, and as a replacement for human evaluation.
To train such evaluators, the standard approach is to collect a large amount of human preference judgments over model responses, which is costly and the data becomes stale as models improve.
In this work, we present an approach that aims to improve evaluatorswithout human annotations, using synthetic training data only. Starting from unlabeled instructions, our iterative
self-improvement scheme generates contrasting model outputs and
trains an LLM-as-a-Judge to produce reasoning traces and final judgments, repeating this training at each new iteration using the improved predictions. Without any labeled preference data, our Self-Taught Evaluator can improve
a strong LLM (Llama3-70B-Instruct)  from 75.4 to 88.3 (88.7 with majority vote)  on RewardBench.
This outperforms commonly used LLM judges such as GPT-4 and matches the performance of the top-performing reward models trained with labeled examples.