The fluency and creativity of large pre-trained language models (LLMs)  have led to their widespread use, sometimes even as a replacement for traditional search engines. Yet language models are prone to making convincing but factually inaccurate claims, often referred to as ‘hallucinations.’ These errors can inadvertently spread misinformation or harmfully perpetuate misconceptions.
Further, manual fact-checking of model responses is a time-consuming process, making human factuality labels expensive to acquire.
In this work, we fine-tune language models to be more factual, without human labeling and targeting more open-ended generation settings than past work. We leverage two key recent innovations in NLP to do so. First, several recent works have proposed methods for judging the factuality of open-ended text by measuring consistency with an external knowledge base or simply a large model’s confidence scores. Second, the direct preference optimization algorithm enables straightforward fine-tuning of language models on objectives other than supervised imitation, using a preference ranking over possible model responses. We show that learning from automatically generated factuality preference rankings, generated either through existing retrieval systems or our novel retrieval-free approach, significantly improves the factuality (percent of generated claims that are correct)  of Llama-2 on held-out topics compared with RLHF or decoding strategies targeted at factuality. At 7B scale,compared to Llama-2-chat, we observe 58% and 40% reduction in factual error ratewhen generating biographies and answering medical questions, respectively.