Automated software engineering has been greatly empowered by the recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs)  for programming. While current benchmarks have shown that LLMs can perform various software engineering tasks like human developers, the majority of their evaluations are limited to short and self-contained algorithmic tasks.
Solving challenging and practical programming tasks requires the capability of utilizingdiverse function calls as toolsto efficiently implement functionalities like data analysis and web development.
In addition, using multiple tools to solve a task needs compositional reasoning by accurately understandingcomplex instructions. Fulfilling both of these characteristics can pose a great challenge for LLMs.
To assess how well LLMs can solve challenging and practical programming tasks, we introduceBigCodeBench, a benchmark that challenges LLMs to invoke multiple function calls as tools from 139 libraries and 7 domains for 1,140 fine-grained programming tasks.
To evaluate LLMs rigorously, each programming task encompasses 5.6 test cases with an average branch coverage of 99%.
In addition, we propose a natural-language-oriented variant ofBigCodeBench,BigCodeBench-Instruct, that automatically transforms the original docstrings into short instructions only with essential information. Our extensive evaluation of 60 LLMs shows thatLLMs are not yet capable of following complex instructions to use function calls precisely, with scores up to 60%, significantly lower than the human performance of 97%. The results underscore the need for further advancements in this area.