Language models (LMs)  often exhibit undesirable text generation behaviors, including generating false, toxic, or irrelevant outputs.
Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) —where human preference judgments on LM outputs are transformed into a learning signal—has recently shown promise in addressing these issues. However, such holistic feedback conveys limited information on long text outputs; it does not indicate which aspects of the outputs influenced user preference; e.g., which parts contain what type(s)  of errors.
In this paper, we use fine-grained human feedback (e.g., which sentence is false, which sub-sentence is irrelevant)  as an explicit training signal.
We introduceFine-Grained Rlhf, a framework that enables training and learning from reward functions that are fine-grained in two respects: (1)  density, providing a reward after every segment (e.g., a sentence)  is generated; and (2)  incorporating multiple reward models associated with different feedback types (e.g., factual incorrectness, irrelevance, and information incompleteness) . We conduct experiments on detoxification and long-form question answering to illustrate how learning with such reward functions leads to improved performance, supported by both automatic and human evaluation. Additionally, we show that LM behaviors can be customized using different combinations of fine-grained reward models.
We release all data, collected human feedback, and codes athttps://FineGrainedRLHF.github.io.