In this work we explore recent advances in instruction-tuning language models on a range of open instruction-following datasets.
Despite recent claims that open models can be on par with state-of-the-art proprietary models,
these claims are often accompanied by limited evaluation, making it difficult to compare models across the board and determine the utility of various
resources. We provide a large set of instruction-tuned models
from 6.7B to 65B parameters in size, trained on 12 instruction datasets ranging from manually curated (e.g., OpenAssistant)  to synthetic and distilled (e.g., Alpaca)  and systematically evaluate them on their factual knowledge, reasoning, multilinguality, coding, safety, and open-ended instruction following abilities through a collection of automatic, model-based, and human-based metrics.
We further introduceTülu, our best performing instruction-tuned model suite finetuned on a combination of high-quality open resources. Our experiments show that different instruction-tuning datasets can uncover or enhance specific skills, while no single dataset (or combination)  provides the best performance across all evaluations.
Interestingly, we find that model and human preference-based evaluations fail to reflect differences in model capabilities exposed by benchmark-based evaluations, suggesting the need for the type of systemic evaluation performed in this work.
Our evaluations show that the best model in any given evaluation reaches on average 87% of ChatGPT performance, and 73% of GPT-4 performance, suggesting that further investment in building better base models and instruction-tuning data is required to close the gap.
We release our instruction-tuned models, including a fully finetuned 65BTülu,
along with our code, data, and evaluation framework to facilitate future research.111https://github.com/allenai/open-instruct