Normally people would just say either of


Not bad.
Acceptable.
Impressive.
Nice.
OK.
Great.


However, let me recompose some of Yogi Berra's:


Love is the most important thing, but your project/application is pretty good too.
Little league projects are great, because it keeps engineers/programmers like you off the main concourse.
You don't have to swing hard to hit a home run. Your application could just make it, with the right timing.


a'la Edgar Allen Poe:


Once upon a midnight dreary, while I pondered weak and weary. Nice app BTW.
Words have no power to impress the mind without the exquisite horror of their reality after deployment.
Science has not yet taught us if mediocrity is or is not the normality of intelligence.
I have great faith in tools like these. My lack of confidence in them, I call it.
After all most apps, my friend, are simply evolved out of fraud, fear, greed, imagination, and creativity.


a'la Hemmingway:


Never mistake an acceptance as excellence.
You do not have to like it just because it works.
Happiness in intelligent people are the rarest thing I know. You seem pretty happy with your app.
No app named horrid, has ever won the Nobel peace prize. We'll deploy it but expect lots of rotten eggs thrown at it.


Generic religious:


The world was created in six days, so was your app. It's good enough.
From the abundance of your heart, your app manifests.


Good/functional but can do better
Now that we know what is in store for c#5, there is apparently still an opening for us to influence the choice of the two new keywords for 'Asynchrony' that were announced by Anders Heijsberg yesterday at PDC10.

async void ArchiveDocuments(List&lt;Url&gt; urls) {
    Task archive = null;
    for(int i = 0; i &lt; urls.Count; ++i) {
        var document = await FetchAsync(urls[i]);
        if (archive != null)
            await archive;
        archive = ArchiveAsync(document);
    }
}


Eric Lippert has an explanation of the choice of the current two keywords, and the way in which they have been misunderstood in usability studies. The comments have several other propositions.

Please - one suggestion per answer, duplicates will be nuked.
