I would have either skipped it (see below) or rejected it for the same reason.

The question was understandable before the edit. The "in-app purchases" part was the potentially redeeming part&ndash;and the reason I might have skipped it, since I don't know if that's a useful, correct, or valuable change. Nothing's wrong from the correctness standpoint.

Once edits don't have to be reviewed making edits like this doesn't strike me as being bad. The goal is to get new-ish editors to make significant changes that make a Big Difference in question quality.

There's a a wide range of what people consider "Big Enough", though.

(I do tend to code-format classnames as a general rule.)

Why was this grammar & formatting edit rejected?
There is an old Japanese saying, “捨てる神あれば、拾う神あり-Suterukami areba hirou kami ari,” meaning “There’s a god who puts you down as well as a god who picks up you.” In other words, “In this world, some people help you, and some people harm you” or “Fortune and misfortune come alternately.”

For example, when you are fired from an IT company, and then hired by its rival company with a higher salary three months later, your peers will say to you “You're a lucky man. There’s a god who throws you away as well as a god who picks you up.”

I’m curious to know if there are similar sayings in English to “Suterukami areba hirou kami ari.” 
