Hypothetical code is difficult or impossible to review because it is a moving, shape-shifting target.  For example, @elibyy asked:


  Should I contain use a variable to avoid mentioning a filename twice?
  
  for example i'm deleting file if it exist

if(file_exists('path/to/file')){
    unlink('path/to/file');
}



An answer was given:


  You could just call

@unlink('path/to/file');



… to which the original author responded:


  however my question is in the abstract perspective, the delete file is example


When code is hypothetical, it can mean whatever the author wants it to mean, and we can't read the author's mind.  When unlink() doesn't actually mean unlink(), "reviewing" code is a waste of time for everybody.

Why is hypothetical example code off-topic for Code Review?
In version 10.0.1 (Win7), AxesLabel with arbitrary text strings works as expected in 2D plots:

Plot[Sin[x], {x, -4, 4}, 
 AxesLabel -&gt; {"Range (km)", "Velocity (m/sec)"}]




In prior versions the same worked for 3D plots as well; but not anymore in v. 10:

Plot3D[Sin[x - 3 y], {x, -3, 3}, {y, -3, 3}, 
 AxesLabel -&gt; {"Range (km)", "Velocity (m/sec)"}, 
 LabelStyle -&gt; Directive[Blue, Large]]




Is this a bug? And is there a workaround?

Thanks
