Because the analysis is regarding Michele Obama 's Democratic Convention speech .Because the writer is trying to paint the Obamas as socialists .Because the writer has analysis .Because Michele Obama delivered some rousing statements .
Why is the writer implying Michele Obama 's statements   appear to have been drawn from a book by a dedicated socialist ?
Now we have analysis regarding Micelle Obama 's Democrat Convention sppech that provides the Marxist basis to the Obama ideology : Michelle Obama has delivered some rousing statements at the Democratic National Convention , where delegates are expected later this week to nominate her husband , Illinois Sen. Barack Obama , to be president . But a blogger is pointing out that the statements appear to have been drawn from " Rules for Radicals , " a book by dedicated socialist Saul Alinsky . " What to make of Michelle Obama 's use [ of ] the terms , ' The world as it is ' and ' The world as it should be ? ' " wrote the Gateway Pundit today .