Deschambault c. La Reine
Deschambault c. La Reine
Base de données – Cour (s)
Jugements de la Cour canadienne de l'impôt
Date
2012-02-17
Référence neutre
2012 TCC 107
Numéro de dossier
2010-3004(IT)I
Juges et Officiers taxateurs
Brent Paris
Sujets
Loi de l'impôt sur le revenu
Contenu de la décision
2010-3004(IT)I
BETWEEN:
ROBERT DESCHAMBAULT
Appellant,
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,
Respondent,
____________________________________________________________________
Appeal heard on common evidence with the appeal of
Monica Huntley 2010-2665(IT)I on February 16 and 17, 2012
and decision rendered orally on February 17, 2012 at Ottawa, Ontario
By: The Honourable Justice Brent Paris
Participants:
For the Appellant:
The Appellant himself
Counsel for the Respondent:
Whitney Dunn
____________________________________________________________________
AMENDED ORDER
The Appellant’s application to have the Judgment rendered from the bench on February 17, 2012 set aside or reconsidered is dismissed.
This Amended Order is issued in substitution of the Order dated April 2, 2012.
Signed at Vancouver, British Columbia, this 26th day of April 2012.
"B. Paris"
Paris J.
Citation: 2012 TCC 107
Date: 20120402
Docket: 2010-3004(IT)I
BETWEEN:
ROBERT DESCHAMBAULT
Appellant,
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,
Respondent.
REASONS FOR ORDER
I rendered an oral decision in this appeal, as well as the related appeal of Monica Huntley v The Queen 2010-2665(IT)I on February 17, 2012. I dismissed the appeal of Mr. Deschambault and allowed the appeal of Ms. Huntley.
Prior to my signing the written judgment, Mr. Deschambault contacted the Court Registry and requested that I set aside or reconsider my decision on the basis that he was on medication during the hearing and for this reason should not have testified.
He has provided a letter from a nurse practitioner who listed two medications Mr. Deschambault was taking at the time of the hearing. The letter also stated that "both these medications have adverse effects which may involve memory".
At the hearing, Mr. Deschambault represented himself, gave evidence and cross-examined Ms. Huntley. Mr. Deschambault did not have any apparent difficulty participating in any of these aspects of the hearing. Nothing in his behaviour indicated that his memory was impaired. The evidence he gave and his cross-examination of Ms. Huntley were cogent and coherent.
I find that the letter submitted by Mr. Deschambault is insufficient to show that his memory was impaired during the hearing. The letter refers only to a possibility rather than a probability or likelihood of impairment. Therefore, it is appropriate to rely on my own observations of Mr. Deschambault’s behaviour in assessing his ability to participate in the hearing.
For these reasons, I decline to set aside or reconsider my decision in Mr. Deschambault’s appeal.
Signed at Ottawa, Canada, this 2nd day of April 2012.
"B. Paris"
Paris J.
CITATION: 2012 TCC 107
COURT FILE NO.: 2010-3004(IT)I
STYLE OF CAUSE: ROBERT DESCHAMBAULT AND HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
PLACE OF HEARING: Ottawa, Ontario
DATE OF HEARING: February 16 and 17 2012
REASONS FOR ORDER BY: The Honourable Justice B. Paris
DATE OF ORDER: April 2, 2012
APPEARANCES:
For the Appellant:
The Appellant himself
Counsel for the Respondent:
Whitney Dunn
COUNSEL OF RECORD:
For the Appellant:
Name: n/a
Firm:
For the Respondent: Myles J. Kirvan
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
Ottawa, Canada