name: Ursel v. Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat and Association of Justice Counsel
unofficial_text: Ursel v. Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat and Association of Justice Counsel
  Collection
  Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
  Date
  2017-01-24
  Neutral citation
  2017 CHRT 3
  File number(s)
  T2141/1516, T2142/1616
  Decision-maker(s)
  Gallivan, Lisa
  Decision type
  Consent Order
  Grounds
  Disability
  Decision Content
  Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
  Tribunal canadien des droits de la personne
  Citation: 2017 CHRT
  3
  Date:
  January 24, 2017
  File Nos.:
  T2141/1516 and T2142/1616
  Between:
  Barbara Ursel
  Complainant
  - and -
  Canadian Human Rights Commission
  Commission
  - and -
  Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat
  Respondent
  (Employer)
  - and -
  Association of Justice Counsel
  Respondent
  (Bargaining Agent)
  Consent Order
  Member:
  Lisa Gallivan
  WHEREAS the Complainant alleges that the employer and the bargaining agent discriminated against her in employment on the grounds of disability, in breach of sections 7, 9 and 10 of the Canadian Human Rights Act (“Act”) as applicable, by not counting her one-year leave without pay for medical reasons as “continuous employment” for the purposes of severance pay;
  AND WHEREAS strictly for the purposes of this litigation and considering the limited scope of this personal complaint as well as the remedies available to the complainant, the employer and the bargaining agent concede that there is a prima facie case for the purposes of sections 7 and 9 of the Act, respectively;
  AND WHEREAS the respondents are prepared to assume given the specific and limited facts in this case and keeping in mind the nature of the remedy available that there is a prima facie case for the purposes of section 10 of the Act;
  AND WHEREAS the respondents have agreed in principle to amend the impugned language in article 21.06 of the new collective agreement by adding “for reasons other than illness” that has yet to be ratified;
  AND WHEREAS the parties have reached a confidential settlement of these Complaints;
  Therefore, on consent of the parties, the Tribunal declares:
  That article 21.06 of the AJC-TB collective agreement which expired on May 9 2014 is discriminatory in the facts of this case.
  Signed by
  Lisa Gallivan
  Tribunal Member
  Ottawa, Ontario
  January 24, 2017
  