name: Montreuil v. Canadian Forces
unofficial_text: Montreuil v. Canadian Forces
  Collection
  Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
  Date
  2006-10-16
  Neutral citation
  2006 CHRT 44
  File number(s)
  T1047/2805
  Decision-maker(s)
  Jensen, Karen A.
  Decision type
  Ruling
  Decision Content
  CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL TRIBUNAL CANADIEN DES DROITS DE LA PERSONNE
  MICHELINE MONTREUIL
  Complainant
  - and -
  CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION
  Commission
  - and -
  CANADIAN FORCES
  Respondent
  RULING
  2006 CHRT 44 2006/10/16
  MEMBER: Karen A. Jensen
  [1] On Friday, October 13, 2006, the Tribunal received a request for an adjournment from the Complainant and the Commission in the present case. The reason for the request was that the Respondent had disclosed, on October 12, 2006, five volumes of documents. Counsel for the Commission and the Complainant vigorously objected to the late disclosure of such a large quantity of documents and stated that they would be unable to properly prepare their cases as a result. The Complainant asked that the hearing be postponed until December 4, 2006 and that new dates for the continuation of the hearing be fixed in 2007.
  [2] The Respondent objected to the request for the adjournment, stating that many of the documents were known to the parties and that they were exaggerating the amount of work that was required to review the documents.
  [3] This request is yet another in a series of pre-hearing requests made by the parties. As the Tribunal decided in previous rulings on disclosure in this case, the present request by the Commission and the Complainant is best left to the Member or Panel hearing the merits of the case. At that time, it may be clearer as to which documents the Respondent intends to rely upon, which documents are truly new in that they have not previously been disclosed, and which documents, if any, must be reviewed by the experts.
  [4] If prejudice is established, it may be that Rule 9(3) of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure will apply. It may also be that the Tribunal will be able to find practical ways to accommodate the parties' concerns. These determinations are better left to the member or the panel hearing the merits of the case.
  Signed by
  Karen A. Jensen
  OTTAWA, Ontario
  October 16, 2006
  PARTIES OF RECORD
  TRIBUNAL FILE: T1047/2805
  STYLE OF CAUSE: Micheline Montreuil v. Canadian Forces
  RULING OF THE TRIBUNAL DATED: October 16, 2006
  APPEARANCES:
  Micheline Montreuil For herself
  Ikram Warsame For the Canadian Human Rights Commission
  Guy Lamb / Pauline Leroux For the Respondent
  