Originally, international law was unaccepting of treaty reservations, rejecting them unless all parties to the treaty accepted the same reservations. However, in the interest of encouraging the largest number of states to join treaties, a more permissive rule regarding reservations has emerged. While some treaties still expressly forbid any reservations, they are now generally permitted to the extent that they are not inconsistent with the goals and purposes of the treaty. COUNT 5
QSN1 A more permissive rule regarding what emerged to encourage the largest number of states to join treaties? ANS1 reservations QSN2 Reservations are generally permitted so long as they are not what? ANS2 inconsistent with the goals and purposes of the treaty QSN3 How did international law originally respond to treaty reservations? ANS3 rejecting them QSN4 Originally reservations were rejected under international law unless which parties of the treaty accepted them? ANS4 all parties QSN5 Because they are generally accepted under international law, a treaty must forbid reservations in what manner to prevent their adoption? ANS5 expressly