There is a wide consensus that the racial categories that are common in everyday usage are socially constructed, and that racial groups cannot be biologically defined. Nonetheless, some scholars argue that racial categories obviously correlate with biological traits (e.g. phenotype) to some degree, and that certain genetic markers have varying frequencies among human populations, some of which correspond more or less to traditional racial groupings. For this reason, there is no current consensus about whether racial categories can be considered to have significance for understanding human genetic variation. COUNT 5
QSN1 What type of group can't be biologically defined? ANS1 racial QSN2 What type of categorization in every day usage is there wide agreement it is only a social construct? ANS2 racial QSN3 What do some people contend racial categories are obviously correlated with? ANS3 biological traits QSN4 Some genetic markers have varying frequencies among what populations? ANS4 human QSN5 What is the majority opinion on whether racial categories can be considered to have impact on human genetic variation?  ANS5 no current consensus