No one party to a treaty can impose its particular interpretation of the treaty upon the other parties. Consent may be implied, however, if the other parties fail to explicitly disavow that initially unilateral interpretation, particularly if that state has acted upon its view of the treaty without complaint. Consent by all parties to the treaty to a particular interpretation has the legal effect of adding another clause to the treaty – this is commonly called an 'authentic interpretation'. COUNT 5
QSN1 No one party to a treaty can do what to the other parties? ANS1 impose its particular interpretation of the treaty QSN2 What may be implied of other parties fail to explicitly disavow a party's initially unilateral interpretation of a treaty? ANS2 Consent QSN3 Consent for a party's unilateral interpretation of a treaty may be implied if that state has acted upon its view of the treat without what from another party? ANS3 complaint QSN4 Consent by all parties to a treaty to a particular interpretation of the treaty has what legal effect? ANS4 adding another clause to the treaty QSN5 The legal effect of adding another clause to a treaty that occurs when all parties to a treaty consent to a particular interpretation of the treaty is commonly known as what? ANS5 an 'authentic interpretation'