YouTube relies on its users to flag the content of videos as inappropriate, and a YouTube employee will view a flagged video to determine whether it violates the site's terms of service. In July 2008, the Culture and Media Committee of the House of Commons of the United Kingdom stated that it was "unimpressed" with YouTube's system for policing its videos, and argued that "proactive review of content should be standard practice for sites hosting user-generated content". YouTube responded by stating: COUNT 5
QSN1 Youtube depends on who to flag inappropriate videos? ANS1 users QSN2 Who checks the flagged videos for unauthorized content? ANS2 a YouTube employee QSN3 Who of the house of commons spoke out on youtube's policies? ANS3 the Culture and Media Committee QSN4 The United Kingdom stated it was what with youtube's policies with moderating its content? ANS4 unimpressed QSN5 When did the UK speak out against youtube's copyright policies? ANS5 In July 2008