Some of the theorists who advocate this "revisionist" critique imply that, because the "pure hunter-gatherer" disappeared not long after colonial (or even agricultural) contact began, nothing meaningful can be learned about prehistoric hunter-gatherers from studies of modern ones (Kelly, 24-29; see Wilmsen) COUNT 3
QSN1 What can be learned from the study of modern hunter-gatherers? ANS1 nothing meaningful QSN2 Who thinks that it is useless to study modern foragers since the real ones are gone? ANS2 theorists QSN3 What type of hunter-gatherer has disappeared ? ANS3 pure hunter-gatherer