In the wake of the discovery, there was much nationalistic rivalry between the French and the British over who deserved credit for the discovery. Eventually, an international consensus emerged that both Le Verrier and Adams jointly deserved credit. Since 1966, Dennis Rawlins has questioned the credibility of Adams's claim to co-discovery, and the issue was re-evaluated by historians with the return in 1998 of the "Neptune papers" (historical documents) to the Royal Observatory, Greenwich. After reviewing the documents, they suggest that "Adams does not deserve equal credit with Le Verrier for the discovery of Neptune. That credit belongs only to the person who succeeded both in predicting the planet's place and in convincing astronomers to search for it." COUNT 5
QSN1 What two countries argued over credit for the discovery of Neptune?  ANS1 French and the British QSN2 Who ultimately deserved credit for the discovery of Neptune?  ANS2 Le Verrier and Adams QSN3 Who questioned Adams's claim to co-discovery of Neptune?  ANS3 Dennis Rawlins QSN4 Who predicted Neptune's place and convinced astronomer's to search for it?  ANS4 Le Verrier QSN5 Who did not deserve credit to co-discovery of Neptune?  ANS5 Adams