Even though there is a broad scientific agreement that essentialist and typological conceptualizations of race are untenable, scientists around the world continue to conceptualize race in widely differing ways, some of which have essentialist implications. While some researchers sometimes use the concept of race to make distinctions among fuzzy sets of traits, others in the scientific community suggest that the idea of race often is used in a naive or simplistic way,[page needed] and argue that, among humans, race has no taxonomic significance by pointing out that all living humans belong to the same species, Homo sapiens, and subspecies, Homo sapiens sapiens. COUNT 5
QSN1 What do all living humans belong to? ANS1 the same species QSN2 What species are all humans? ANS2 Homo sapiens QSN3 Race has no taxonomic significance among whom? ANS3 humans QSN4 What set of traits do some scientists use race to make distinctions among? ANS4 fuzzy QSN5 How do scientists around the world continue to conceptualize race? ANS5 in widely differing ways