The Supreme Court ruled in the Head Money Cases that "treaties" do not have a privileged position over Acts of Congress and can be repealed or modified (for the purposes of U.S. law) by any subsequent Act of Congress, just like with any other regular law. The Supreme Court also ruled in Reid v. Covert that any treaty provision that conflicts with the Constitution are null and void under U.S. law. COUNT 5
QSN1 In what cases did the US Supreme Court rule that treaties do not have a privileged position over Acts of Congress? ANS1 Head Money Cases QSN2 The US Supreme Court ruled that treaties can be repealed or modified by what for the purposes of US law? ANS2 Act of Congress QSN3 What Supreme Court case ruled that a treaty provision that conflicts with the US Constitution is null and void under US law? ANS3 Reid v. Covert QSN4 The US Supreme Court ruled that treaties can be repealed or modified for the purposes of US law just like what by any subsequent Act of Congress? ANS4 any other regular law QSN5 Any treaty provision that conflicts with the US Constitution is considered what under US law? ANS5 null and void