With House Republicans prepared to take a vote Thursday on yet another version of a plan to overhaul the 2010 Affordable Care Act, attention has been especially focused on whether Obamacare’s popular prohibition against denying coverage based on preexisting medical conditions will remain in place. The AHCA eliminates cost sharing and offers a stingier tax credit to defray premium costs, likely resulting in higher overall health costs that may make insurance unaffordable for many people. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) is not expected to have completed its analysis detailing the effects of the latest changes to the legislation overhauling the nation’s healthcare system in time for the Thursday vote. Kliff’s Notes 
 
 Your daily top health care reads, with research help from Caitlin Davis 
 
 Today's top news 
 
 "Key Republicans Long, Upton say they now support Obamacare repeal with more money for pre-existing conditions" : “Two key Republican lawmakers say that they will support a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare after changes were proposed to provide additional funds for people with pre-existing conditions. Obamacare would stay intact while the House Republicans who voted to gut the law have a big shiny target on their back heading into the 2018 midterms.” —Heather Caygle, Politico 
 
 “Democrats don’t actually want the law repealed.
– House Republicans promise to call a vote on their plan to replace ObamaCare on Thursday, but the Hill notes that lawmakers will cast those votes without an official estimate of how much the plan costs or how it will affect coverage for Americans. That is, the Congressional Budget Office hasn't had time to assess the American Health Care Act and score it. "I wish that we had it, all right?" said Rep. Fred Upton, a key figure who switched from no to yes when the White House agreed to add $8 billion for pre-existing conditions. But Upton said any such CBO estimate is probably weeks away, adding that the measure could be changed, perhaps by the Senate, at that point. At Vox, Sarah Kliff writes that the rush to vote is a risky move for the GOP. "The CBO score will come out sooner or later, and Republicans might be faced with defending a bill they don't like much at all." The sticking point over pre-existing conditions had threatened to derail the measure, and critics say the $8 billion amendment still won't do enough to ensure that people with pre-existing conditions will be adequately covered. An analysis by the Fact Checker blog at the Washington Post says the issue is so nuanced that the simplistic talking points coming from both sides on the issue are useless. "If the bill ever became law, much would depend on unknown policy decisions by individual states—and then how those decisions are implemented." Meanwhile, the Wall Street Journal reports that even if the vote is successful, it would "face uncertain prospects" in the Senate. Among other things, the House bill would reduce funding for Medicaid, which provides coverage for low-income and disabled Americans.