Gone are the days when you just took over your dad’s business; if you did that now you’d be “settling.”

Gone is the era of believing that, as one traditionalist said in David Mitchell’s novel Cloud Atlas, “no matter what you do it will never amount to anything more than a single drop in a limitless ocean”; today’s parents tell us that the world is our oyster. You ask “Should I do this?” and, supposedly, if you lean back or feel compelled backward, the answer is no. In short, even if you do backtrack, don’t tell yourself that you can “always change your mind” when you’re making a decision.
In a 6–2 decision (NLRB v. SW General, Inc), the U.S. Supreme Court puts new restrictions on presidential powers, limiting a president's authority to staff certain top government posts in a case involving an appointment to the National Labor Relations Board saying that under the Federal Vacancies Reform Act, a person cannot serve as the acting head of a federal agency once the president nominates him or her to permanently serve in the role if it is a position that requires U.S. Senate confirmation. The court upholds a lower court's ruling that then-President Barack Obama exceeded his legal authority with his temporary appointment of an NLRB general counsel in 2011. The ruling will give President Donald Trump and future presidents less flexibility in filling jobs that require Senate confirmation.