In this section, we will compare the results from our network w.r.t. to other upsampling networks PU-Net [1]}, EC-Net [2]}.
We use chamfer distance CD and HD [3]} for the evaluation of the network output.
All methods have been tested with an upsampling ratio of 4.
Figure REF  shows our results w.r.t. other approaches.
It can be clearly seen from the figure that PU-Net results are more noisy on the surface as compared to EC-Net.
But our results clearly outperform both PU-Net and EC-Net and are less prone to noise.
The quantitative results for Figure REF  is shown in Table REF .
It can be infered from the table that the values of CD and HD for our network are small when compared to PU-Net and EC-Net.
<TABLE>