Action detection results of the state-of-the-art methods on THUMOS14 [1]} and ActivityNet [2]} dataset are compared by mAP (%) in Tables REF  and REF  respectively. The methods are categorized to fully-supervised, weakly-supervised, semi-supervised, self-supervised and US (unsupervised). We also summarize the advantageous and limitations of fully-supervised methods and methods with limited supervision in Tables REF  and REF .
<TABLE><TABLE>