We do not consider satellite AGNs, because
satellites complicate the interpretations of the results.
To demonstrate this, we show in the right panels of
Figure REF  the 2PCCFs of the total AGN sample (tAGN),
in comparison to the corresponding control galaxy
sample, tG\(^{\rm c}\) . As one can see, the correlation for
tAGNs is weaker than that of the control sample on both small and
large scales. At scales of hundreds of \(\, h^{-1}{\rm {kpc}}\) , there is a dip in
the ratio between tAGN and tG\(^{\rm c}\)  [1]}.
Comparing to the results for centrals (green lines),
we can see that including satellites enhances the difference
between AGNs and normal galaxies on both small and large scales.
One possible explanation is that the AGN fraction is
lower among satellites than among centrals , .
Clearly, more effects have to be taken into
account in order to explain results obtained from a mixture
of centrals and satellites.
