Fig. REF  compares the one-dimensional \(\chi ^2\)  likelihood functions
for \(m_{\tilde{g}}\)  (upper left), \(m_{\tilde{q}_R}\)  (upper right), \(m_{\tilde{t}_1}\)  (lower left)
and \(m_{\tilde{\tau }_1}\)  (lower right) found in the SU(5) model including LHC 13-TeV constraints
(solid blue lines) with the restricted fake NUHM2 sample
(solid grey lines) and, for comparison, results from our previous NUHM2 analysis
that used only the LHC 7- and 8-TeV constraints (dashed
grey lines) [1]}. We see here and in Fig. REF 
that the restricted `fake' NUHM2 sample exhibits, in general, best-fit
masses that are similar to those found in the full SU(5) sample. The
most noticeable differences
are that lower masses are disfavoured in the restricted sample
relative those in the full SU(5) model, indicating that the latter has
some limited ability to relax the NUHM2 lower bounds on sparticle
masses, e.g., at the 95% CL. The previous
NUHM2 analysis [1]} also yielded similar best-fit masses but, as
could be expected, gave 95% CL lower limits on sparticle masses that
were further relaxed.
Similar features can also be observed in
Figs.  REF - REF ,
where we have also included the `fake' NUHM2 subsample.
