Quantitative comparison. Table REF  shows the FFG performance of our FSFont and other competitors. We conducted the experiment on UFUC and UFSC. FSFont clearly outweighs previous SOTA methods on all of the similarity metrics from pixel-level to perceptual-level. On UFSC setup, MX-Font[1]} and AGIS-Net [2]} generates little more correct characters than FSFont. However, FSFont still generates the most correct characters on UFUC.
AGIS-Net suffers from a performance drop on Character Accuracy in UFUC. This may suggest that its generalization to new characters are limited. Meanwhile, the user study of Style Consistency of FSFont is remarkably better than other methods, which further verifies that FSFont generates the visually similar results from users' perspective.
