We additionally provide memory and run-time comparison to other aggregators and HSNet [1]}. The results are obtained using a single NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 GPU and Intel Core i7-10700 CPU. As shown in Table REF , we observe that VAT is relatively slower and comsumes more memory than other aggregators. About 0.3 GB of more memory consumption and 5 ms slower run-time occur with the proposed VAT in return for the performance. From the perspective of aggregators, 0.3 GB and 5 ms gap seem quite trivial to us.
