The \(\delta _\mathrm {LT}^n\)  data from E97110 agree well with the earlier E94010 data. At \(Q^2 \gtrsim 0.08\)  GeV\(^2\) ,
the data agree with the latest \(\chi \) EFT calculations [1]}, [2]}
and the phenomenological MAID model [3]}. Data and predictions disagree at lower \(Q^2\)  despite the fact
that there, \(\chi \) EFT calculations should be most robust.
Therefore, while the agreement between the latest \(\chi \) EFT calculations and E94010 data suggested that the \(\delta _\mathrm {LT}\) 
puzzle may be solved, the new data refute it.
The renewed surprise with \(\delta _\mathrm {LT}^n\)  makes it interesting to investigate the
integral \(I_\mathrm {LT}(Q^2)\)  [4]} since it involves the same integrand as \(\delta _\mathrm {LT}\)  but without the \(x^2\)  weighting:
\(I_\mathrm {LT}(Q^2) = \frac{8M^2}{Q^{2}}\int _0^{x_0}\Bigl [g_1(x,Q^2)+g_2(x,Q^2)\Bigr ]dx.\) 
