Results.
We report the performance of our SEER models and baseline models in Table REF . We observe that (i) self-supervised models achieve competitive performance on this task which corroborates the finding in previous work [1]}, (ii) We further observe that as model size increases, copy detection performance improves for the same features size, (iii) we observe \(90.6\) % mAP with best SEER model which is an improvement of +5.1% over previous best results. We show some qualitative analysis and comparison in Appendix Figure REF  and additional implementation details in Appendix .
<TABLE>