A comparison with the properties measured by Lacy & Sabby [1]} shows excellent agreement for the masses (as expected) but not for the radii: we find values significantly lower than the \(1.51 \pm 0.02\)  and \(1.16 \pm 0.01\)\(~{\rm R}_\odot \)  given by Lacy & Sabby [1]}. We expect our own radius measurements to be more reliable as they are based on light curves of much better quality and greater quantity than in previous studies.
