The \(n_{\rm {max}}=1\)  model does not explicitly account for the Fourier space effects of exclusion, but fits quite well down to \(k=0.9-1 \ h/\mathrm {Mpc}\)  at the 2%.
For all halo masses, the scale-dependent correction due to exclusion is sub-dominant to the constant shot noise, (as seen in the left panel of Fig. REF ), and for lower halo masses the model fails to be accurate at 1-2% at slightly lower \(k\) .
This seems consistent with the results of [1]}, who are able to fit \(P_{hh} (k)\)  to lower maximum \(k\)  using a Lagrangian bias expansion, including a \(k^{2}\)  term.
However, exclusion must be properly modeled for percent-level accuracy in both configuration and Fourier space, and we return to this point in the following section, where we provide context for interpretation of the quoted accuracies in configuration and Fourier space with regard to exclusion.
