Results on this dataset are shown in Table REF , where
it can be observed that while all performances are very close, all randECOC variants achieve superior accuracy than all GBDT variants in all folds.
Moreover, the combinatory approach of randECOC achieves the state-of-the-art results (99.81%) on this dataset, while Mohanty et al., Too et al., and KC et al. reported %99.34, %99.75, and %98.34 respectively [1]}, [2]}, [3]}.
