In the case of the Hypersyn network, there is no system-imposed hard-cap on the number of transactions per second that can be processed. Because of the CRDT-like [1]} nature of sparse Merkle roots, the Hypersyn protocol does not require a consensus algorithm. It substitutes consensus for state. By redefining what money is, we manage to dissolve the double spending problem. By eliminating the double spending problem, we can dissolve the need for consensus and the need to enforce a system-wide absolute order of events. By not requiring validators to check every transaction in the system, we manage to dissolve the need for a distributed ledger. Instead of trying to solve for the problems that blockchains have, Hypersyn tries to redefine them. As Stafford Beer once said: "It is better to dissolve problems than to solve them" [2]}.
