----- Forwarded by Miyung Buster/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 03/23/2001 02:16 PM
-----

	Rob Bradley@ENRON
	03/23/2001 09:22 AM

		 To: Miyung Buster/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc:
		 Subject: "Green Coal" power plant planned for Washington State

Please distribute

March 23, 2001, 12:00 a.m. Pacific

'Green' coal plant is planned

by Lynda V. Mapes
Seattle Times staff reporter

Washington's first new coal-fired power plant in 30 years is being
planned for Cherry Point in Whatcom County.

The plant is proposed to generate 249 megawatts of power and could be up
and running within 36 months, said John O'Brien of U.S. Electric Power of
Point Lookout, N.Y.

The plant's size falls just below the requirement for review by the state
Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council. The facility must still meet all
requirements of the federal Clean Air Act as well as state air-pollution
controls.

Coal is considered the dirtiest of major fuels for power generation,
emitting more carbon dioxide and gases that lead to smog than natural
gas.

But coal plants vary widely in the amount of emissions they produce,
depending on the quality of the coal, the technology used to burn it and
the environmental standards.

O'Brien said the plant will burn only ultralow-sulfur coal and use stack
scrubbers and other technology to make the coal plant at least as clean
as a natural-gas-fired plant.

"We are going to employ the best technology, and we will spend the money
to make sure it happens. If there is anything dirty about it, we will not
build it."

The company is also examining ways to partially offset carbon-dioxide
emissions - the major cause of global warming - through reforestation of
land in northwestern Washington, O'Brien said.

"On CO2, we will do our best, and we will do better than anyone else, and
more than any of the gas-fired folks," he said.

O'Brien says he knows the plant will be controversial despite his planned
"Green Coal" public-relations campaign beginning May 1.

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/cgi-bin/WebObjects/SeattleTimes.woa/wa/got
oArticle?zsection_id=268466359&text_only=0&slug=coal23m&document_id=1342765
28

Gregory Rehmke
Foundation for Economic Education
(914) 591-7230 x213; Cell: (914) 760-5638
www.freespeaker.org


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"Dixon, Billy D" <billy.dixon@bp.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, November 06, 2001 1:00 PM
To:	Heard, Marie
Subject:	RE: Enron Canada Corp

Principal Operating Offices:

BP Corporation North America Inc.
200 East Randolph Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60601

BP Energy Company
501 West Lake Park Boulevard
Houston, Texas 77079

Vastar Resources, Inc.
200 East Randolph Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60601

BP Canada Energy Company
240 - 4th Avenue S.W.
Calgary, Alberta T2P 4H4

BP Canada Energy Marketing Corp.
200 East Randolph Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60601

Cibola Energy Services Corporation
350 N. St. Paul Street
Dallas, TX 75201

IGI Resources, Inc.
200 East Randolph Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60601

BP Oil Supply Company
200 East Randolph Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60601

BP Products North America Inc.
200 East Randolph Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60601

BP Amoco Chemical Company
200 East Randolph Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60601

Atlantic Richfield Company
333 S. Hope Street
Los Angeles, CA 90071

Amoco Production Company
501 WestLake Park Boulevard
Houston, Texas 77079

BP Chemicals Inc.
200 East Randolph Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60601

-----Original Message-----
From: Heard, Marie [mailto:Marie.Heard@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 8:54 AM
To: billy.dixon@bp.com
Subject: RE: Enron Canada Corp

I sure will if you will tell me the principal place of business of all
your entities party to the Master Netting Agreement.

Enron Canada Corp.
3500, 400 - 3rd Avenue S.W.
Calgary, Alberta  T2P 4H2

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	"Dixon, Billy D" <billy.dixon@bp.com>@ENRON
> Sent:	Tuesday, November 06, 2001 7:47 AM
> To:	Heard, Marie
> Subject:	Enron Canada Corp
>
> Would you please tell me where Enron Canada Corp.'s principal place of
> business in Canada is located?
>
> Very truly yours,
>
> BILLY
> Billy D. Dixon
> Attorney
> BP America Inc.
> 501 Westlake Park Blvd., Rm 16.166
> Houston, Texas 77079
> Direct 281/366-4745
> Fax 281/366-5901
> billy.dixon@bp.com
>
> ***IMPORTANT -- THIS EMAIL AND ANY ATTACHMENTS HERETO ARE
> ATTORNEY-CLIENT
> AND/OR ATTORNEY WORK-PRODUCT PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL.  If you have
> received this email in error, do not under any circumstances read,
> forward,
> copy, disseminate or save this email or any of its attachments.  If
> you have
> received this email in error, take the following actions: (1) reply to
> this
> email indicating that you received this email in error, and (2) delete
> and
> completely erase this email and its attachments from your computer and
> any
> backup systems or "Deleted Items" folders.
>

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Enron requires that we purchase all of our equipment through a central
purchasing process.  The reasons for doing this are two fold.

1) Enron supports only certain technologies.  It is important to standardize
the technology sitting on each person's desktop to ensure it works with other
technology already on your desk and that the IT staff knows how to support
the use of this technology.

2) Enron has cut deals with suppliers that give us good prices.  In the past,
the Portland office has not strictly adhered to this policy.  We had good
business reasons for not complying--we could buy the same equipment at the
same price a lot faster if we just bought it ourselves locally.

Here's the problem.  People have not always bought the "same" equipment.  For
example, people have recently purchased flat screen monitors that are
different than the Compaq flat screens that most of us use.  This requires
our technology group to understand how the different screens work, whether
they need different drivers installed on your hard drive, and what to do with
them if they break.  There are numerous other examples.  In aggregate, this
practice has put additional strains on our already constrained technology
support staff and will cause us problems in the future if any of the
non-standard equipment breaks and can't be fixed or replaced in a hurry.

Accordingly, Dave Steiner and I would appreciate it if you would do the
following when purchasing technology.
All pending and future purchasing requests should now go through the local IT
Department.
Please send an email to the "IT Portland" email account when you have an IT
related need such as a Palm Pilot, LCD screen, special software, etc.
The local IT team will then assure compliance and availability of the
requested item(s) and get back to you with cost, ETA, and any other relevant
information.
If the centralized Houston purchasing process is too slow to meet our
business need, IT Portland will investigate buying the exact same product
locally.

Again, our goal is to streamline the process while conforming to corporate
standards.  This will also assure that the items acquired will work with
existing infrastructure and be easily supported by our IT team.  The team has
assured me they will be prompt in responding to your requests.  If you have
any questions, please contact Dave Steiner or me.  Your adherence to this
process is appreciated.


Lady with python on one side , Star wars on the other...

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rob Laird <RLaird@natsource.ca>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Rob+20Laird+20+3CRLaird+40natsource+2Eca+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:25 PM
To:	Dorland, Chris
Subject:	RE:

I would go with the star wars painting on the side myself...

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris.Dorland@enron.com [mailto:Chris.Dorland@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:23 AM
To: RLaird@natsource.ca
Subject: RE:

Don't forget pink fuzzy dice and chain steering wheel and red interior
lights. Chicks are going to love it. I'm going to get a chick with a python
wrapped around her painted on the side and get those tires that stick out 6
inches from the wheel wells with gold plated rims. SWEET! The funny thing
is that in some neighborhoods in Houston (predominately latin) that would
be a killer ride.

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   Rob Laird <RLaird@natsource.ca>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Rob+20Laird+20+3CRLaird+40natsource+2Eca+3E+40ENRON@ENRON
.com]

   Sent:   Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:17 PM
   To:     Dorland, Chris
   Subject:  RE:

   Sweet, purple, lowered, black windows, zz top playing, glow kit, sweet
   ride.........

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Chris.Dorland@enron.com [mailto:Chris.Dorland@enron.com]
   Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:16 AM
   To: RLaird@natsource.ca
   Subject: RE:

   We were talking about getting matching PT cruisers with CRUISR1 and
   CRUISR2
   personalized plates.

       -----Original Message-----
      From:   Rob Laird <RLaird@natsource.ca>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Rob+20Laird+20+3CRLaird+40natsource+2Eca+3E+40ENRON@ENRON
   .com]

      Sent:   Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:09 PM
      To:     Dorland, Chris
      Subject:  RE:

      Why don't you get cowan to get you a deal on a PT cruiser, I heard he
      loves
      those things....

      -----Original Message-----
      From: Chris.Dorland@enron.com [mailto:Chris.Dorland@enron.com]
      Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:35 AM
      To: RLaird@natsource.ca
      Subject: RE:

      Listen to this shit. If I want to move my car back to Canada I
   (Enron)
      would have to pay $2000 USD to move it plus 6.1% of KBB value in
   import
      duty plus 7% GST plus $200 excise tax plus about $400 in permits.
   Looks
      like I am looking for a new car as well.

          -----Original Message-----
         From:   Rob Laird <RLaird@natsource.ca>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Rob+20Laird+20+3CRLaird+40natsource+2Eca+3E+40ENRON@ENRON
      .com]

         Sent:   Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:02 AM
         To:     Dorland, Chris
         Subject:

         Whoops I did it again,......I'm not that innocent...

   **********************************************************************
      This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
   affiliate
      and
      may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
   the
      intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
   by
      others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
   (or
      authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender
   or
      reply
      to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
      all
      copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are
   not
      intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or
   evidence
      a
      binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
      affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may
   not
      be
      relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
   otherwise.
      Thank you.

   **********************************************************************


John:

Attached is the vol. skew that was used for the current day (April 10) calc;
the prior day (April 9) calc. still used the one you loaded on Mar. 30.

i.e., the official post_id 1101853 used the April 10 vol. skew for current day but the Mar. 30 vol. skew for the prior day valuations.

Jeremy


Please increase deliveries to Eastrans to 60,000 MMBtu/dy from 50,000
MMbtu/dy  for 2/3/01.

The redeliveries will be 7300 MMBtu/dy from Fuels Cotton Valley and
52700 MMBtu/dy to PG&E


Please prepare a draft incorporating the following credit terms.

thanks
brant


Sounds kind of vague to me. I think we should stick to known publications who we think add value.


Please see the attached summary of the captioned session.  The positions of the speakers, as well as those of the Commissioners, are summarized.  Should you require additional information on a specific topic, please don't hesitate to contact me.


Please prepare our standard confidentiality agreement for the counterparty
below.  Please deliver to Dick Robinson.  The agreement should read such that
it will also be effective if we view the financials at their office (instead
of receiving a hard copy of the statements).  Let me know if you have any
questions.  Thanks!

Richard T Robinson
11/07/2000 11:18 AM
To: Laurie Mayer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

  Counterparty:  Marcal Paper Mills, Inc.
  One Market Street
  Elmwood Park, NJ 07407-1451

  Attn:  Peter A. Marcalus, Sr. VP
  201-703-6404  ph #.
  201-703-6234  fax #

Enron is proposing to sell physical mixed waste paper to Marcal as well as
enter into financial swaps.  We need to prepare a confidentiality agrmt which
will allow Enron  to review financials on Marcal.

Thanks - Dick


Brian,

In an effort to keep things consistent at UBS we have tried to perfect a roll spreadsheet that all regions should use.  We added extra rolls so we should never have to add rolls.  We have saved copies for our new P&L's in O:erms\erms_adm\netco\2002\0102\Regions0102 (this will be out new regions file until further notice.

Can you copy one of those files and use that as your new P&L's?  Let me know if you see a problem in doing that.  We are trying to start linking up all new P&L's to the DPR, can you save yours out to that file when you are ready.

Thanks

Kam


THE LIGHTHOUSE
"Enlightening Ideas for Public Policy..."
Vol. 3, Issue 44
November 5, 2001

Welcome to The Lighthouse, the e-mail newsletter of The Independent
Institute, the non-politicized, public policy research organization
<http://www.independent.org>. We provide you with updates of the
Institute's current research publications, events and media programs.

Do you know someone who would enjoy THE LIGHTHOUSE? Please forward
this message to a friend. If they like it, they can add themselves to
the list at http://www.independent.org/tii/lighthouse/Lighthouse.html.

-------------------------------------------------------------

IN THIS WEEK'S ISSUE:
1. In Defense of Free Speech
2. Antitrust Settlement Bodes Well for Consumers
3. How the FDA Helped Retard Child Development

-------------------------------------------------------------

IN DEFENSE OF FREE SPEECH

The intimidation campaign against New York radio talk-show
personality "Grandpa" Al Lewis's website ISP is by no means unique.
Recent efforts to suppress the voices of ideological opponents are
widespread and not limited to one particular ideology or viewpoint.

While "Grandpa Munster" drew ire for his outspoken views in
opposition to the U.S. government responses to the Sept. 11th
atrocities, some on American college campuses have been reprimanded
for voicing support for the U.S. military response -- or even for
simply displaying American flags, according to Paul Craig Roberts,
research fellow at The Independent Institute.

"It is permissible to burn the American flag on university campuses.
But don't try waving one," writes Roberts in his syndicated column.

College administrators on some campuses have ordered the removal of
American flags from student dorm rooms and school buses, and banned
the staff of a university TV station from wearing red, white and blue
ribbons. Some professors have also been demoted or had their websites
shutdown.

At San Diego State University one Arabic-speaking Ethiopian student
was put on warning when he chastised three Arab students he heard
"expressing their delight in the attacks on the World Trade Center
and the Pentagon," writes Roberts.

American colleges and universities were once famous for permitting
all forms of speech to be heard in the "marketplace of ideas." Too
often today we see one form of orthodoxy trying to silence another --
all to the detriment of the spirit of free inquiry and open debate.

One need not agree with Noam Chomsky's political leanings to
recognize genuine patriotism when he said, "If we don't believe in
freedom of expression for people we despise, we don't believe in it
at all."

See "Losing on the Home Front," by Paul Craig Roberts, at
http://www.independent.org/tii/lighthouse/LHLink3-44-1.html.

Also see the transcript of John R. MacArthur's Independent Policy
Forum address, "Censorship and Propaganda in the Gulf War: How
Government Can Mold Public Opinion," at
http://www.independent.org/tii/lighthouse/LHLink3-44-2.html.

For more on political correctness in academia, see the Independent
Institute book, THE DIVERSITY MYTH: Multicultural Intolerance on
Campus, by David Sacks and Peter Thiel, at
http://www.independent.org/tii/lighthouse/LHLink3-44-3.html.

-------------------------------------------------------------

ANTITRUST SETTLEMENT BODES WELL FOR CONSUMERS

Last week's settlement between Microsoft and the U.S. Justice
Department is good news for consumers because it does little to
hamper Microsoft, according to economist Dominick Armentano, a
research fellow at The Independent Institute, in an op-ed published
in Canada's NATIONAL POST.

The settlement -- still to be approved by the federal judge assigned
to the case and several state attorneys general -- would require
Microsoft to adopt certain specific operating practices (namely to
stop engaging in exclusive dealing arrangements with computer makers,
share its Windows source code with competitors, and allow computer
makers more freedom to display non-Microsoft software applications).

Microsoft, however, has already nearly abandoned its exclusivity
arrangements and moved toward an "open source" arrangment, observes
Armentano.

"In short, the government got virtually nothing from this legal
monstrosity of a lawsuit, which is precisely what it deserves,"
Armentano writes. "Microsoft, on the other hand, is a clear and
decisive winner on the issue that first sparked the lawsuit: the
tying of its Web browser to its operating system."

Like the antitrust prosecution of IBM in the 1970s and early '80s,
the Microsoft antitrust case was without merit, and illustrate the
need to fundamentally reform or repeal antitrust policies, according
to Armentano.

"Antitrust has a long and sorry history of prosecuting aggressively
competitive companies that have innovated rapidly and lowered prices
to consumers. And most antitrust 'remedies' attempt to restrain
(price) competition -- witness the provision in the Microsoft
settlement that requires published rates and uniform discounts -- or
make it easier for less efficient firms to do more business.

"Consumers and businessmen need free, open markets and they need
protection from force and fraud. They don't need antitrust regulation
and protectionism that hampers innovation and harms society,"
Armentano concludes.

See "Microsoft's Big Win," by Dom Armentano (THE NATIONAL POST, 11/3/01),
http://www.independent.org/tii/lighthouse/LHLink3-44-4.html.

Also see "Settlement is 'a reward, not a remedy,'" by John Borland
(CNET News.com, 11/3/01)
http://www.independent.org/tii/lighthouse/LHLink3-44-5.html.

For a summary of Dominick Armentano's classic, ANTITRUST AND MONOPOLY
(The Independent Institute, 1990), see
http://www.independent.org/tii/lighthouse/LHLink3-44-6.html.

For a summary of Stan Liebowitz and Steve Margolis's book, WINNERS,
LOSERS & MICROSOFT, (The Independent Institute, 2001), see
http://www.independent.org/tii/lighthouse/LHLink3-44-7.html.

-------------------------------------------------------------

HOW THE FDA HELPED RETARD CHILD DEVELOPMENT

When the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently approved
two new additives for infant formula, the agency's leaders cheered
that the FDA was hard at work to improve children's health. The
additives -- DHA and AA, two fatty acids present in breast milk --
play an important role in the development of healthy brains and eyes.

Unfortunately, as Alexander Tabarrok, Research Director at The
Independent Institute points out, the FDA could have safely approved
the additives years ago but didn't.

Britain, Japan, Israel, Belgium, the Netherlands and more than 50
other countries have been using DHA- and AA-enhanced infant formula
for years, but this did not help speed up the approval of the infant
formula additives in the United States. Consequently, millions of
babies have been denied the benefits of 4 more I.Q. points and
approximately one line of better vision on a standard eye chart.

This horror story is but one example in the long history of FDA
over-caution. "Numerous studies have shown that FDA rules and
regulations have resulted in high prices, fewer new drugs, and long
delays in getting new drugs to market," writes Tabarrok in a recent
op-ed.

How can the FDA be reformed, so that Americans can enjoy the benefits
of pharmaceutical innovation more quickly?

"As a good first step," writes Tabarrok, "the U.S. should establish
reciprocity agreements with countries that have a proven record of
approving safe drugs -- including most western European countries,
Canada, Japan, and Australia.

"If the U.S. and, say, Britain had a reciprocity agreement, for
example, then drugs and supplements approved in Britain would gain
immediate approval in the U.S., and vice-versa. Such an arrangement
would reduce delay, and eliminate duplication and wasted resources."

See "Excess FDA Caution Threatens Health," by Alexander Tabarrok
(PROVIDENCE JOURNAL, 8/23/01), at
http://www.independent.org/tii/lighthouse/LHLink3-44-8.html.

Also see:

"Off-label Prescribing of Drugs Calls FDA Role into Question," by
Scott Esposito (PITTSBURGH TRIBUNE-REVIEW, 11/25/00), at
http://www.independent.org/tii/lighthouse/LHLink3-44-9.html.

"Assessing the FDA via the Anomaly of Off-Label Drug Prescribing," by
Alexander Tabarrok (THE INDEPENDENT REVIEW, Summer 2000), at
http://www.independent.org/tii/lighthouse/LHLink3-44-10.html.

For more information on the FDA, see the Independent Institute's new
micro-site, at
http://www.independent.org/tii/lighthouse/LHLink3-44-11.html.

-------------------------------------------------------------

THE LIGHTHOUSE, edited by Carl P. Close, is made possible by the
generous contributions of supporters of The Independent Institute. If
you enjoy THE LIGHTHOUSE, please consider making a donation to The
Independent Institute. For details on the Independent Associate
Membership program, see
http://www.independent.org/tii/lighthouse/LHLink3-44-12.html or
contact Mr. Rod Martin by phone at 510-632-1366 x114, fax to
510-568-6040, email to <RMartin@independent.org>, or snail mail to
The Independent Institute, 100 Swan Way, Oakland, CA 94621-1428. All
contributions are tax-deductible.  Thank you!

-------------------------------------------------------------

For previous issues of THE LIGHTHOUSE, see
http://www.independent.org/tii/lighthouse/LHLink3-44-13.html.

-------------------------------------------------------------

For information on books and other publications from The Independent
Institute, see
http://www.independent.org/tii/lighthouse/LHLink3-44-14.html.

-------------------------------------------------------------

To subscribe (or unsubscribe) to The Lighthouse, please go to
http://www.independent.org/subscribe.html, choose "subscribe" (or
"unsubscribe"), enter your e-mail address and select "Go."

-------------------------------------------------------------

THE LIGHTHOUSE
ISSN 1526-173X
Copyright ? 2001 The Independent Institute
100 Swan Way
Oakland, CA 94621-1428
(510) 632-1366 phone
(510) 568-6040 fax


Your panel:

Bill Reed: 619.696.4542
Mike Florio 415.929.8876
Terry Winter: 916.351.2222
Jim Macias: 925.600.2306.

Between us, we know them all well.  Be happy to help contact.

Best,
Jeff


Hello,

I just received your message.

Are still in NYC? I like it a lot.
I wish my job was associated with traveling.

According to Saturday meeting - I will be there.

Have a save trip back home.

patrycja

From: VKaminski@aol.com Save Address - Block Sender
To: pdalecka@hotmail.com Save Address
CC: VKaminski@aol.com Save Address
Subject: Re: Hello
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 23:22:26 EST
Reply  Reply All  Forward  Delete  Previous Next  Close

Hello Patrycja,

Greetings from the Big Apple.

Saturday works for me. Let's meet at 4:00 p.m. at Carrabba's. It's an
Italian
restaurant on I-45 in the Woodlands. After you pass Conroe, take the
Research
Forest exit  (5-10 miles past Conroe) and stay on the feeder road. Go
through
the lights (Research Forest intersection with I-45). As you continue along
the feeder road you will pass on your right the Woodlands Mall and the
ExxonMobil building,. The restaurant will be on your right, about 200-300
yards before the next lights (I-45 and Sawdust).

I shall have my cell phone with me (713 898 9960). In case you arrive early
you can stop at my home: 10 Snowbird Place, (281) 367 5377. I shall send you
later the instructions how to get there. I shall leave home around 3:45.

Look forward to meeting you.

Vince


Print them out I will do them by hand.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hillis, Kimberly
Sent:	Thursday, February 08, 2001 2:01 PM
To:	Lavorato, John
Subject:	FW: Review Forms

John,

you need to fill out reviews on all of your direct reports.  do you want me to print out these forms for you to fill them in and i will type them for you?

 << File: EVAL_VPMD.doc >>  << File: EVAL_MGPF.doc >>  << File: EVAL_ADSUP.doc >>


Are you sure this is Gas Mktg?  I have a deal ticket that shows Reliant.

-Eric

	From:  Ami Chokshi @ ENRON                           01/05/2000 03:06 PM

To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kyle R Lilly/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Janet H Wallis/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Deals 104641 & 104639

The deals should be Entex Gas Mktg. Eric, could you please change that name.

Thanks,
Ami
---------------------- Forwarded by Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron on 01/05/2000
03:04 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Kyle R Lilly @ ECT                           01/05/2000 10:20 AM

To: Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Deals 104641 & 104639

Ami,

 Could you confirm with Janet if the two deals mentioned above should be
Reliant Energy - Entex or Entex Gas Marketing?  Entex called & advised they
show it to be a sell to Entex Gas Marketing & that's the way I see it as
well.  Just let me know.

Thanks,
Kyle


Start Date: 12/21/01; HourAhead hour: 21;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001122121.txt


Attached is a detailed report on the deals that GPG Bus Dev is currently
looking at, and a historic log of prior activities.  It is very much a "work
in progress", and will be updated weekly.  I plan to share it with anyone
within GPG that would find it useful probably on a monthly basis.

Your comments are welcome.

JNG


http://oasis.caiso.com/

http://dotect.ect.enron.com/genstat/epe/status/

https://iso_si/iso/

http://www.ets.oatiinc.com/

file:///W|/ISO_SI/ISOLOCATION.HTML

http://www.tsin.com/nodes/wscc.html


ditto. sounds good.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kelly, Jacqueline [mailto:Jacqueline.Kelly@schwab.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, October 10, 2001 2:07 PM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	RE: Hello Out There

This week is crazy for me, lets try for next week.

-----Original Message-----
From:	Dasovich, Jeff [SMTP:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, October 10, 2001 10:32 AM
To:	Kelly, Jacqueline
Subject:	RE: Hello Out There

Love to go to lunch.  Maybe Friday?  If not Friday, let's try next week.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kelly, Jacqueline [mailto:Jacqueline.Kelly@schwab.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, October 10, 2001 11:03 AM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	RE: Hello Out There

Hi Jeff,

I have been wanting to e-mail you to meet up for lunch, now that I am in the city.  I know you are super busy, but let me know if you have time.  The only day that is not good is Tuesday - I have an aerobics class at 1 with a gay drill sergeant - he's great!  He dances around the class yelling at us.

Also, we are planning a trip to Tahoe the weekend of Dec 15th to celebrate graduation.  I know you're not, but let me know if you want to come.

take care and hope to see you soon,
Jackie

-----Original Message-----
From:	Dasovich, Jeff [SMTP:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, October 10, 2001 7:36 AM
To:	Kelly, Jacqueline
Subject:	Hello Out There

Hey, I haven't seen you at all and have been thinking about you.  Just wanted to check in and see how things are going.  Hope you are well and things are going swimmingly.

Best,
Jeff

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


In the past, Jesse would let me know about our imbalance and cashout price.
He would do the paperwork and trade out of the imbalance with another party.

Susan

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Victor Lamadrid                           03/22/2001 10:40 AM

To: Susan W Pereira/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Venice Gathering System LLC

Susan, Are you interested in imbalance trading for VGS?
---------------------- Forwarded by Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT on 03/22/2001
10:38 AM ---------------------------
To: Brenda H Fletcher/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Loving/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jesse
Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clarissa Garcia/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Venice Gathering System LLC

Brenda,
Victor and I totally agree with you.  With the increase of wellhead
production and swings that we are seeing, we are totally revisiting the way
we handle wellhead.  Beginning with March we will be taking a closer look at
what our production is doing and will enter appropriate cash out tickets on
Venice.

Just to let you know, we are going through the process of looking at wellhead
production on all our pipes and at what is the best method to handle.

Brenda H Fletcher
03/22/2001 09:30 AM
To: Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly S Olinger/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Venice Gathering System LLC

Venice invoices for cashout on a one month lag.  The February invoice cashed
out the January  volume of <19,385> at $6.8121 for a total credit of
$132,052.55.  The imbalance for February production is  <4455> and to trade
the imbalances, VGS must be notified in writing on or before the 25th of
March.

There are no cashout tickets for VGS on the CPR cashout reports that I ran
for January and February production.  From looking back at several months of
invoices, we appear to get cashed out every month.  Would it be possible to
have cashout tickets entered for VGS?

If you have see any problems with the imbalance volumes reflected on the
invoice, please let me know.

Thanks,
Brenda


can you send the confirm to me.  It didn't come my way.


---------------------- Forwarded by Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT on 10/02/2000 03:38 PM
---------------------------

Bradley Diebner
10/02/2000 03:38 PM
To: Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Xeron

Lisa,

Here are the products Xeron wants to trade

US Nat gas fin swap, US nat gas FOB phy fwd, US Normal Butane Fin, US Normal
Butane FOB fwd,  US propane fin, and US propane phy, US purity ethane fin, US
purity ethane phy fwd.

Thanks,
Brad


The generators are going to go nuts over this.  They'll do all the pounding needed on their own.  Calpine will likely lead the charge, which should be interesting....

-----Original Message-----
From: Steffes, James D.
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 4:10 PM
To: Mara, Susan; Parquet, David
Cc: Schoen, Mary; Dasovich, Jeff; Comnes, Alan; Kaufman, Paul
Subject: RE: BRPU Rides Again -- CPUC Begins "Integrated Resource
Planning"

I think that California needs to make a final decision on whether it wants competitive markets or not.  I wonder if PURPA has anything to say about meeting incremental Utility needs and what that does to the CDWR contracts?

I don't see Enron getting engaged in this quagmire unless there is a clear business reason.

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Mara, Susan
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 3:42 PM
To: Parquet, David; Steffes, James D.
Cc: Schoen, Mary; Dasovich, Jeff; Comnes, Alan; Kaufman, Paul
Subject: BRPU Rides Again -- CPUC Begins "Integrated Resource Planning"
Importance: High

Dave and company,

Here we go again.  Dave, is this anything you want us to engage in?  Jim, what do you think about this?

-----Original Message-----
From: Steven Kelly [mailto:steven@iepa.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 12:23 PM
To: 'Aaron Thomas'; Alex Sugaoka (E-mail); Bill Woods (E-mail); Bob
Ellery (E-mail); Bob Escalante (E-mail); Brian T. Cragg (E-mail);
Carolyn A Baker (E-mail); Curtis Kebler (E-mail); Douglas Kerner
(E-mail); 'Doyle Hibler'; Duane Nelsen (E-mail); Ed Maddox (E-mail); Ed
Tomeo (E-mail); Eric Edstrom (E-mail); Greg Blue (E-mail); Hap Boyd
(E-mail); Jack Pigott (E-mail); Joe Ronan (E-mail); John G. Larrea
(E-mail); John O'Rourke (E-mail); Kate Castillo (E-mail); Ken Hoffman
(E-mail); Kent Burton (E-mail); Kent Palmerton (E-mail); Mark J. Smith
(E-mail); Marty McFadden (E-mail); Schoen, Mary; Michael L. Hawkins
(E-mail); Nam Nguyen (E-mail); Paul Wood (E-mail); Paula Soos (E-mail);
Peter H. Weiner (E-mail); Rachel King (E-mail); Rich Dyer (E-mail);
Roger Pelote (E-mail); Ross Ain (E-mail); Scott Harlan (E-mail); Steve
Ponder (E-mail); Steve Schleimer (E-mail); Susan J Mara (E-mail); Ted
Cortopassi (E-mail); Tom Hartman (E-mail); Tony Wetzel (E-mail); Trond
Aschehoug (E-mail); Ward Scobee (E-mail); 'Warren Mack'
Cc: Andy Brown (E-mail); 'Carol Hudson (E-mail)'; Chris Ellison
(E-mail); 'Jan Smutny-Jones (E-mail)'; 'Katie Kaplan (E-mail)'; 'Kelli
Norton'; Sandra Moseley (E-mail); 'Steven Kelly (E-mail)'; Thomas R.
McMorrow (E-mail); Gates, Bob; Charles Linthicum (E-mail); 'Cody Carter
(E-mail)'; 'Curt Hatton (E-mail)'; Parquet, David; 'Dean Gosselin
(E-mail)'; 'Eileen Koch (E-mail)'; 'Eric Eisenman (E-mail)'; 'Frank
DeRosa (E-mail)'; 'Hap Boyd (E-mail)'; 'Hawks Jack (E-mail)'; 'Jim
Willey (E-mail)'; 'Joe Greco (E-mail)'; John Stout (E-mail); 'Jonathan
Weisgall (E-mail)'; 'Kelly Lloyd (E-mail)'; 'Kent Fickett (E-mail)';
'Lynn Lednicky (E-mail)'; Fillinger, Mark; 'Randy Hickok (E-mail)';
Scott Sadler (E-mail); 'Stephanie Newell (E-mail)'; Steve Iliff
(E-mail); William Carlson (E-mail)
Subject: CPUC Initiating Rulemaking on "Integrated Resource Planning"
Importance: High

The IEP Regulatory Affairs Committee over the past few weeks has been
discussing the prospects of state agencies (e.g. the CEC) pursuing a
long-term (1-2 year) strategy of re-introducing centralized, Integrated
Resource Planning in California.  Indeed, some CEC staff have used sought to
obtain planning/modelling authorities that could lead to dispatch
instructions or, perhaps, identification of generation units for
"retirement."

The CPUC is opening a rulemaking (OIR) to return to "integrated resource
planning."  The BRPU returns!  Anyway, we will be discussing this further at
the Regulatory Affairs conference call next Tuesday.

We will provide additional information on the OII as soon as it becomes
available.

-----Original Message-----
From: Andy Brown [mailto:abb@eslawfirm.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 10:36 AM
To: Steven Kelly; doug kerner; Jan Smutny-Jones
Subject: highlights from CPUC meeting
Importance: High

FYI.  Highlights from today's CPUC meeting.  It is still in progress,
with few energy items remaining.  Regular results memo to follow.

CPUC opens new rulemaking to return to "integrated resource planning"
with contemplation of process that sounds much like the discredited
Biennial Resource Plan Update (BRPU) proceeding.  Clearly contemplates
utility construction of new generation projects, but also calls for
life-cycle cost analysis of all options, including new asset
construction, power purchase agreements, conservation, transmission,
etc.

CPUC rejects new interstate transmission facilities as not needed for
reliability purposes (lines to NV, AZ and MX).  Will begin new phase re
economic projects.

CPUC rejects request for clarification regarding QF contract
amendments.  Parties had requested clarification from CPUC decision
based on language in Admin Law Judge (ALJ) ruling that stated extensions
could go forward until the Commission acts.  CPUC states that parties
remain free to negotiation changes, but that they must move forward on
ordinary review process.  This decision primarily undermines QF contract
amendments with SCE's.

CPUC rejects PG&E's call for market valuation of retained generation.
PG&E argued that CPUC must use market value of retained assets to set
cost of service rates.  CPUC rejects argument.  Duque will concur, but
notes that there are outstanding issues including the likelihood that
CPUC will fail to meet statutory deadline to market value retained
assets, and fact that PG&E still has stranded cost recovery rights that
require market valuation.  It is also unclear, notwithstanding the CPUC
settlement with SCE, how post-transitions period costs will be recovered
per that agreement.

--
Andrew Brown
Sacramento, CA
andybrwn@earthlink.net


That may not be so easy an answer.  I think we would have to talk to
Utilicorp.'s lawyers.  I  wouldn't be surprised that they had some policy or
laws that won't allow them to guaranty the obligations of other companies.
Utilities in the U.S. are odd birds, there are a lot of Chinese walls in
effect with them, I've dealt with similar issues on other utilities.  If you
need us to talk to them get me the name and phone number of a contact and
we'll give them a call.


Steve:

I have slightly revised the talking points to incorporate the concept of FERC
jurisdiction over reliability and to note that there are procedural options
for DOE and/or FERC  --  actions that can be taken immediately (DOE emergency
authority) and longer-term solutions (the CRT or Petition for Rulemaking).

Sarah


Yeah I guess that makes sense.  I thought you were madly in love with this
cat.


alright, no williams

can i interest you in a receiver and say lamar smith for robert smith or ron
dayne


WHERE are my macadamias?  Did you break the scales at the doctor?  Do you
know how funny I am?  I'm finally leaving for the evening, and I'm so psyched
to go home and play fetch with myself with the glow in the dark ball!  Have a
great weekend if I don't talk to you during the hour I'll be here in the
morn....

Hugs to Emma


Date correction, Dec 14, not Nov 14.

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 12/11/2000 03:58
PM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
12/11/2000 03:55 PM
To: Kimberly Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Victoria
Versen/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Hodge/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Tenn Meeting

We a conference room big enough for 8 people on Thursday, Nov 14 at 3:00 PM.

Vickie, I will see if the meeting date can be changed if Dan calls.


Works for me.

David Forster
11/29/99 06:11 PM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: New cook inlet


Anna,

I am moving back to Canada to trade gas but I would really like to get your daily technical sheet. Could you e-mail it to me or perhaps start posting it on the commodity fundy's site? Thanx

Chris


If your schedule permits, please join us at our Holiday Party.  Click on the
attached link to launch your invitation.

 http://invitation.enron.com


In case this becomes big news in the United States, attached is a summary
from the Argentina team of the political situation in Argentina.  It is not a
political meltdown but it is a significant change in the executive branch and
potential realignment of the political parties in Argentina.  The cabinet
shuffle and resignation of the vice president are in the wake of the senate
bribery scandal in Argentina where the opposition was supposedly bribed to
vote for the governments changes in law (actually in favor of economic
reform).  The cabinet shuffle was economics oriented with the economic team
being strengthened, but potentially at the expense of the alliance that holds
the government and a majority in Congress over Menem's party, the peronists.
The vice president was the senior member of the second party in the alliance
(President De La Rua is senior member of the first party in the alliance).
Financial markets reacted slightly negatively to the shakeup with bond
spreads widening slightly and Argentine stock prices down slightly.  As a
minimum we will keep a close eye on the political and financial situation and
be prepared for any more significant reaction by the financial markets.
---------------------- Forwarded by James M Bannantine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
10/08/2000 07:04 PM ---------------------------

Don Black@ENRON
10/07/2000 08:16 AM
To: James M Bannantine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Joe Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron, Diomedes Christodoulou/SA/Enron@Enron, Peter
E Weidler/NA/Enron@Enron, Michael Guerriero/SA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Argentina Political Analysis

Mike,
Thanks for the quick turnaround on this from you and your team.

Jim,
This is as far as this distribution went.  Please edit as needed and forward
to whomever you feel necessary.
---------------------- Forwarded by Don Black/SA/Enron on 10/07/2000 11:07 AM
---------------------------
From: Michael Guerriero on 10/07/2000 10:13 AM
To: Don Black/SA/Enron@Enron
cc: Guillermo Canovas/SA/Enron@Enron, Cristian Folgar/SA/Enron@Enron, Maria
Belen Salvador/SA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Argentina Political Analysis

As reported Carlos Chacho Alvarez resigned his position Friday as Vice
president of Argentina.

The main reason of this resignation was a political disagreement with Cabinet
changes announced on Thursday 5th by President De la Rua.  Alvarez
publicly noted he could no longer tolerate the political differences with the
President over the senate bribery scandal. Particularly Alvarez disagreed
with De la Rua's decision to promote Alberto Flamarique from Minister of
Labor to General Secretary and to keep Fernando de Santibaez as Chief of the
Intelligence Department.  Both Flamarique and Santibaez are suspected of
paying bribes to Senators to vote for a new Labor Law. Alvarez has
emotionally championed the fight against the senate scandal and has been
strongly advocating for the resignation of Flamarique, Santibaez and all
Senators involved in the affair.

It was considered that the decision of De la R?a was intended to demonstrate
that he, and not Alvarez, holds the power and that De la R?a wanted to
demonstrate that the changes were focused on improving the economic situation
and to move beyond the Senate scandal.

The main changes in the cabinet, announced on Thursday 5th, are the following:
Chistian Colombo (economist, in good relationship with Machinea) will replace
Terragno as Chief of Cabinet.
Machinea (Minister of Economy) will also be responsible of the Ministry of
Infrastructure.
Jorge De la R?a (former General Secretary of the President and President's
brother) will be Minister of Justice.
Patricia Bullrich (peronist) will be Minister of Labor.

As a consequence of Alvarez' resignation, Flamarique resigned to his position
of General Secretary of the President.

Regarding the preliminary impact of the political changes to the economic
situation it could be considered the following:

Before Alvarez resignation, the cabinet changes were considered positive
intending to increase the power of  the Minister of Economy and reduce the
internal disagreements in the Administration.
Although Alvarez (the leader of the Frepaso party) said he will be still part
of the "Alianza" (the Radical and Frepaso party alliance) in Office, Alvarez'
resignation could lead to the division of the Alianza and reduce the ability
of De la Rua to pass new laws in the Congress. A breakup of the coalition
would make the Peronist the largest party in both houses of Congress only
compounding the potential for government gridlock
This situation will weaken De la Rua and probably foster new re-alignments in
the political field.
All the situation will increase economic uncertainty and will delay economic
recovery. The market will wait to see if a conflict develops in the Alianza.
De la Rua and his team will probably be forced to take "strong" decisions to
retain the political initiative, strength and control.
Machinea will probably try to gain the market confidence, announcing that De
la Rua's Administration will not change the macro foundations of the economic
agenda and even increase its commitment toward monetary and fiscal
equilibrium, exchange rate policy, respect for vested rights, etc.

Financial analysts have viewed the situation as "an institutional crisis with
unknown effects on the economy". The insecurity of the Argentina's political
future caused Argentine debt paper to fall. The Argentine JP Morgan Emerging
Market Bond Index widened 23 basis points to 685 over US Treasuries.
Argentina's 17 year global bond fell only slightly. There does not appear to
be a market panic as noted by the trading of Argentine ADR's in New York.
They were down cents rather than dollars and a number of them closing
unchanged.

We will continue to monitor the situation and update as warranted.


Get ready to help the Body Shop celebrate it's 15th anniversary and kick off
National Health and Fitness Week.

Beginning Monday, May 14 and ending Friday, May 18, 2001 all Enron Employees
are invited to work-out at the Body Shop as a complimentary guest.  Just
visit http://hrweb.enron.com/wellness, print and fill-out the body shop 15th
anniversary guest form, and return it to the Body Shop prior to your first
workout.

The week long celebration includes a speech and autograph session with Clyde
Drexler, Monday, May 14, 2001, 11:30 AM-12:00 noon (spaces will be limited
and you must RSVP to Body.Shop@enron.com  by Friday, May 11, 2001, 3:00 PM);
an early morning workout with the Houston Rocket's Power Girls on, Thursday,
May 17, 2001 starting at 6:30 AM followed by breakfast and autograph session
in the Body Shop Fuel Station at 7:30am - 8:30am; a boot camp style class led
by the German/American Foreign Legion and much, much more.

Visit the Body Shop website for a detailed calendar of events, or for
additional information, please e-mail the Body Shop at Body.Shop@enron.com.


This doesn't track with the West Power presentation.  They should be
consistent as to market segmentation, etc.

Mark


Start Date: 1/16/02; HourAhead hour: 21;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011621.txt
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database


521590

broker has 262.50


----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 02/27/2001 08:27 PM -----

	Stacy Carey <SCAREY@ISDA.ORG>
	02/26/2001 06:58 PM

		 To: US REGULATORY COMMITTEE <USREGCOMM@isda.org>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Letter to House Rules Committee Supporting Netting Amendment

The Bond Market Association and ISDA have circulated the attached letter in
support of our amendment package to other trade associations asking for
their decision about joining the letter by noon tomorrow.  The purpose of
the letter is to signal widespread support for the netting amendment
package.  It has been proposed that individual firms also have the
opportunity to sign the attached letter. To that end, would you please let
me know if your firm will be or will not be in a position to sign the letter
tomorrow.  Many thanks --   Stacy

 <<Dreier Netting Letter.doc>>

Stacy Carey
Director North American Regulatory Policy
International Swaps and Derivatives Association
(202) 457-6545 ph
(703) 256-1833 fax
(917) 543-9622 cell
scarey@isda.org

 - Dreier Netting Letter.doc


Any problem with this?

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/22/2000 08:35
AM ---------------------------
From: Gregg Penman on 11/21/2000 05:00 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Peoples Letter Agreement

Kay - Here is my attempt to turn the term sheet into something executable.  I
have accepted all of William Harmon's changes except for the second paragraph
under amended terms.  William used the wording "The payment late payment
amount is calculated...".  I changed it to "The payment interest on overdue
amounts is calculated..." to be consistent with the reference in the above
paragraph.  I don't think this changes any substance, but I defer to you.  I
think that is all I changed.  I also added a quick intro. and a paragraph on
future payments to reiterate this is only for October purchases.  Neither may
be necessary, let me know.  I am not sure your availability tomorrow, but I
would love to hear from you ASAP in the morning to get this in front of
Peoples for signature.  Russell Diamond is coordinating the internal Enron
approvals with Global Finance, Credit and RAC.

Thanks again for your help on your vacation day.

Gregg


Here are wire instructions.
---------------------- Forwarded by Stephen Thome/HOU/ECT on 04/17/2001 04:06
PM ---------------------------

lee.johnson@ps.ge.com on 03/30/2001 11:26:01 AM
To: stephen.thome@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Payment instructions

 <<NEW GEPPI BANK ACCOUNT .rtf>>

Steve,

Attached is the new wire transfer instructions for LM unit payments.

If you have any questions, please call me.

Thanks again,

Lee Johnson
GM, N. American Sales

713-803-0952

 - NEW GEPPI BANK ACCOUNT .rtf