fyi.
----- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 10/03/2000 02:33 PM -----

	Mark Whitt@ENRON
	Sent by: Mark Whitt@ENRON
	10/03/2000 01:03 PM

		 To: Scott Josey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, kcrisa@apex2000.net, Joan
Quick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Theresa Staab/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paul T
Lucci/NA/Enron@Enron, Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Crescendo Noms into NWPL

I spoke with Kent Harris at Wildhorse today and he stated there position to
me on a few things.

1.  Our Interruptible noms to NWPL for Wed. were not cut due to contractual
reasons, we were cut due to a lack of capacity.  He said that the San Arroyo
#2 compressor was down and without it they cannot make additional deliveries
to NWPL.  They hope to have it up by friday and will try to provide us some
capacity into NWPL.

2.  Kent reiterated their position regarding our contract by stating that
"the intent of the original contract was not to take gas through other
systems other than the Mesa system".  In addition he stated that we do not
have the right to choose which pipeline our gas is delivered to.

3.  He also asked whether or not we were willing to negotiate on the current
situation or if we wanted to let the 'lawyers fight it out".  I reiterated
that we have been waiting for them to either acknowledge that they will
gather the entrada gas under the current contract or provide us with another
alternative.  Absent either of those 2 things happening all we can do is try
to live by the existing agreement.  He stated that they have new estimates on
the cost to construct a new line through the South Canyon and it is
approximately $1MM less than their original esitmate.

We left it that he would determine whether or not they would gather  the
Entrada under the existing contract or make a new proposal that would most
likely wrap the Entrada and Dakota up under one new deal and replace the
existing contract.

I told him we would determine whether or not we wanted to "let the lawyers
fight over the existing contract" or work on a new deal for all the
production.

P.S.  They are still very interested in some type of Joint Venture.

Mark
----- Forwarded by Mark Whitt/NA/Enron on 10/03/2000 11:07 AM -----

	Theresa Staab
	10/03/2000 09:21 AM

		 To: Mark Whitt/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Paul T Lucci/NA/Enron@Enron, Nicole Cortez/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven P
South/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jacqueline P Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey J
Brewer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joan Quick/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Crescendo Noms into NWPL

Liz Orr with Wildhorse just called to inform me we cannot nominate into
NWPL.   Her legal department has informed her there are issues with the
contract and until they inform her otherwise, our gas can only flow into
Questar.   Physically, we can flow into NWPL but contractully we cannot.

We have changed the nominations back to Questar for tomorrow's gas day.

Sorry about that, (we tried)

Theresa


It was great to see you as well.  I look forward to seeing you again in the future.

Saludos,

Scott

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mestre, Erica
Sent:	Tuesday, October 30, 2001 1:38 PM
To:	Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ENRON; Don Black/HOU/EES@ENRON
Subject:	Bye !!
Importance:	High

Finally, after a long week in Houston and good interviews I am going back to Argentina tomorrow.
I'd like to tell you that was very nice to see you again. And I hope to come back to Houston soon and with a new job !!!
Of course I'll go to visit you again.

See you soon.
Regards,
Erica.


Vince/Stinson,

This is a summary fo the report submitted by the Godbole Committee appointed
by the state government to review the Dabhol project.

The report clearly suggests renegotiation on the tariff.  A lot of what they
mention is something we won't agree to.  However, to me it seems apparent
that this can be worked out.

Regards,
Sandeep.
---------------------- Forwarded by Sandeep Kohli/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
04/16/2001 09:05 AM ---------------------------

	Anshuman Srivastav

	04/16/2001 08:40:04 AM

To: Sandeep Kohli/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Godbole Report

Attached is a small summary that Gaurav and Rajesh put together on the
Godbole Report. This is confidential.
---------------------- Forwarded by Anshuman Srivastav/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
04/16/2001 07:08 PM ---------------------------

Gaurav Varshney
04/16/2001 07:04 PM
To: Anshuman Srivastav/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject:


He was emailed this same email that you are about to read, he called in and that call changed his financial future!

Is working for the "boss" too demeaning and unrewarding?

Are you sick of depending on a job with too little pay and too many hours with no personal reward and even less future?

If you are determined to retire in the next 2 - 5 years with enough income to have REAL Financial Independence and Freedom, and are not afraid to work for it, I can help you.

I am looking for people with a Good Work Ethic and an extraordinary Desire to Earn at Least $10,000 per Month Working From Home!

This LEGTITMATE HOME-BASED INCOME OPPORTUNITY can put you back in Control of your Time, Your Finances, and your life!

If you have tried other opportunities in the past that have failed to live up to their promises, THIS IS DIFFERENT THAN ANYTHING ELSE YOU'VE SEEN!

THIS IS NOT A GET-RICH-QUICK SCHEME!

YOUR FINANCIAL PAST DOES NOT HAVE TO BE YOUR FINANCIAL FUTURE!

CALL ONLY IF YOU ARE SERIOUS!

1-800-449-2065 TOLL FREE (3 minute recording)

DON'T GO TO SLEEP WITHOUT LISTENING TO THIS!

"All our dreams can come true - if we have the courage to pursue them" - Walt Disney

To be taken out of our database click "reply" and click "send".


Kate,
So far, know you all are still inputting deals:

ICE broker   3/27/01
Enron Buys Reliant Energy Ser
Jul-Sept
355.00
Sp15

thanks


I have corrected the differential pricing(calc sheet prices) for 01/01 &
02/01.  You should be able to redraft now.  Let me know when you want to
discuss the trigger price discrepancies.  Thanks.
PL


---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 04/27/2000
08:08 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Donna Greif                           04/26/2000 05:37 PM

To: Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, George
Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: CES deals

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Donna Greif/HOU/ECT on 04/26/2000 05:36
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Dana Daigle @ ENRON                           04/25/2000 03:46 PM

To: David Oliver/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna
Greif/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kathryn Cordes/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: CES deals

Here are the deal that I have completed today.  The numbers in bold are
hedged and need to be split.

Old Deal #  New Deal #  Desk
142002  251833  East
145075  251851  East
144936  250498  Texas
226138  250600  East
226763  250668  East
135842   250703   East
164669   250751   East
227727  250893  East
168454  250932  East
136933  251129  East
136880  251212  East
143673  251257  East
163815   251280   East
136286  251357  East
136287   251394   East
219685  251410  East
158625   251864   East
135895  251619  East
135958  251624  East
164708   251631   East
226538  251641  East
134755  251650  Central
144917  251659  Texas

Thanks for you help!
D


At my Technology Investing advisory, we reap HUGE
GAINS from the opportunities other investors miss.

OUR SECRET WEAPON?  A laser-like focus on All-Tech,
All-the-Time.  You see, most investment advisors pride
themselves on a broad reach across dozens of industries.
They claim that gives you more opportunities to profit.

But that's JUST BALONEY.  There's no way one
individual -- or even a substantial team -- can spread
himself that thin and still do quality research...especially
when it comes to the complex world of high tech.

That's why my team and I do ONE THING, and one thing only.
We target the hottest growth markets of technology -- from
microchips to software to biotech.  And we reap the profits
 most investors miss.

DID YOU OWN Immunex, for example?

I'm sure by now you've heard of Amgen's buyout of this
fast-growing biotech firm.  When that deal was announced
yesterday, it included a 17% premium for our Immunex stock.
But our profits -- locked in after I advised clients to
sell in an urgent email bulletin -- were much higher than
that.  We banked 105% GAINS in just 8-months' time.

I hope you owned Immunex.  But if you didn't, don't worry
about it.  In just a moment I'll tell you all about my c
urrent #1 PICK -- another overlooked stock that should
DOUBLE YOUR MONEY at least in 2002....then multiply it
5-times over by 2007.

BUT FIRST, an important lesson to be learned from Immunex.
Don't believe everything you hear on Wall Street.

Back when we bought Immunex, traders were down on almost
everything related to the drug industry.  And I agreed with
them -- to a point.  You see, the big drug companies are
facing intense pressure from generic drug-makers.  Merck's
big disappointment is a perfect example -- 0% earnings growth
next year.  That's pitiful in today's drug hungry world.

But as the baby boomers pass into their "golden years,"
drugs are still a HUGE PLAY.  just not in the traditional
way.  Most big pharma companies -- like Merck, Pfizer and
J&J -- have really slipped when it comes to new drug
development.

But INNOVATIVE biotechs like Immunex are a totally different
story.  Their R&D is RED-HOT.  So when Wall Street tarred
the traditional firms and biotechs with the same brush...we
stepped in to pick Immunex up for a song.

Eight months later, we're 105% RICHER.  Now, we're about to
pull off another profit coup just like it -- but with MUCH
BIGGER potential.  And this time around, YOU have the
opportunity to join us.

Here's the truth about today's so-called communications
"fiber glut" that everyone keeps talking about:

WHEN the World Trade Center got hit, the Internet slowed
down -- very noticeably slowed down.  In fact, it nearly
came to a grinding halt!  That means there isn't nearly
enough capacity or redundancy built into the system to
accommodate a blip in demand.

Sources tell me that the government is very worried about
this problem.  After all, this is the second time it's
happened.  Back in July, a tunnel fire in Baltimore slowed
the Internet to a crawl for two full days.

That means our communications systems -- and therefore our
economy -- are very, very vulnerable.

Ten years ago, it wouldn't have mattered.  But today,
commerce and security is COMPLETELY DEPENDENT on those
systems.  Virtually nothing moves without it.  That's how
banks and brokerages transfer funds...how dispatchers route
fleets of trucks...how many Americans get paid through
direct deposit.

And we are closer to the BREAKING POINT than 99.9% of
Americans even begin to understand.  Here's one example.

Qwest -- one of America's biggest carriers -- recently said
they're 60% loaded on their network.  That doesn't sound
too bad...until you understand how these networks operate.
You can't load a network much past 65%.  In fact, 70% is
virtually CATASTROPHIC -- because the network spends so
much time searching for open channels, it doesn't spend any
time actually sending packets of information.

The system locks.  Communications stops.  The nation comes
to a standstill.

AMERICA IS FALLING BEHIND the rest of the developed world.
Internet traffic systems currently run faster in Australia,
Europe and even South America.  That's because we push out
more data than everyone else -- but we're not increasing
capacity at anywhere near the needed rate.

We've got to catch up -- and we've got to catch up fast!
Otherwise business, the economy and our national security
all go in the CRAPPER.

BUT WHY do we have this capacity problem amidst a "fiber glut?"
Because  95% of all the fiber that has ever been laid is
"dark" -- that is, it's not activated.  And the company I'm
recommending is the #1 supplier of the components needed to do
the job.  I'm looking at a DOUBLE -- possibly a TRIPLE by
this time next year.  And I fully expect to multiply our money
five-times over by 2007.  In fact, this stock truly has
"ten-bagger" potential!

At the height of the boom, this company's stock was nearly
20-times higher.  So what changed?  Spending on communications
networks dried up.  Now the government is ready to pump
$100 billion in emergency spending into the economy; interest
rates are practically zero; and the need isn't just vital
for the economy anymore -- it's a question of NATIONAL
SECURITY!

Please don't miss out.  You'll kick yourself big-time if you
do. Get this company's name -- and full details -- in my
urgent profit bulletin: 5-Times Richer By 2007.  It's yours
FREE, simply for accepting a 100% RISK-FREE trial subscription
to my Technology Investing advisory.

TAKE a full six months to measure the value of my advice for
yourself.  Don't like what you see...don't make the profits
you want, just cancel, and your subscription doesn't cost
you a dime.   That's reason enough to give it a try.  Because
if I'm right -- and I'm staking my reputation and my own money
on this call -- you can double your money, at least, in 12
months...and make your fortune several times over in the
coming years.

Please don't miss out.  Give yourself a chance.  At least take
a look at Technology Investing to see what you think.  Our
unusual six-month guarantee of total satisfaction means my
advisory costs you nothing if you don't 100% approve.

Please click here to sign up now:
http://www.ppi-orders.com/index.htm?promo_code=0YE155

Sincerely,

Michael Murphy
Technology Investing

P.S.  The longer you wait, the more profits you MISS OUT on.
This stock has a long ways to run -- but it's already UP 41%
since October 1st, in recognition of this company's vital new
role in national security.

Dark fiber does no good.  Actual carrying capacity is strained
to the limits.  And get this --- data traffic is DOUBLING every
year now.  That means a network running at 63% of capacity needs
to double its load by this time next year just to keep up.
That's why the fiber must be lit.  That's why the fiber will be
lit.  Click here to take advantage of this opportunity now.
http://www.ppi-orders.com/index.htm?promo_code=0YE155

------------------------------------------------------

ACCOUNT MANAGEMENT

We hope this free digest of investing advice is
valuable to you. If you'd like to change your e-mail
address (DON.BAUGHMAN@ENRON.COM), or unsubscribe, please
do so by going to the following address:

http://www.listmgr.net/remove.cgi?jobno=42350832&XQN=73522

Your name will be removed from our list within 7-10
working days.

------------------------------------------------------

Sunday Dec 23, 2001 08:20:45


Daren -

I need a service list contract set up for ENA for the MidTex line for Feb. 00
and March forward for meter 9735, deal # 203469 (XPRTUNG).  Does ENA have a
valid contract to ship on the MidTexas line?  Volume managEment would like
this done before close.  Please let me know.

- Aimee


Start Date: 4/23/01; HourAhead hour: 14;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042314.txt


Here is another incident stemming from the A-S 30 inch pipeline rupture of
December 4, 2000.  Although the facts are still being developed, this
customer was also being supplied off of the A-S line and when it went down,
HPL had to activate another pipeline to serve this customer from a different
source or direction.  This line may have had some liquids settled in the line
or other sediments which became dislodged and ultimately may have caused a
failure at Ameripol's boiler.  This resulted in a fire which they claim
caused equipment and product damages.  Liquids are not identified in the
quality specifications for the gas to be delivered to Ameripol, only not more
than 20 grains of sulfur or 7 pounds of water vapor.
Additionally, the contract does contain a waiver of consequential damages.
Gary indicated to me that they told him that about $130,000 of the loss was a
result of lost sales due to the inability to produce product.  They have
faxed us a written demand or notification which I will forward as soon as I
receive it.
----- Forwarded by Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT on 12/21/2000 04:41 PM -----

	Gary W Lamphier
	12/21/2000 02:18 PM

		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary A Hanks/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Greg Brazaitis/HOU/ECT@ECT, James McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Engineered Carbons/Ameripol Synpol

I was informed of a situation where Ameripol was receiving liquids in our
gas.  They claim they suffered losses of $180,000 in equipment and product
damage.  They are asking for reimbursement.  Please let me know what happened
Gary and Dan what damages they could collect.
Thanks,

Gary


ADMINISTRATIVE

Evaluation of Support Requirements - Donnie Willmann, Bill Curra and Edgar
Zuleta completed an evaluation of support requirements for the Caribbean and
Latin America that includes both continuous support activities and special
projects for 2001.  This will be presented to Mike Terraso.

EHS Corporate Operations Monthly Report - The February 2001 Monthly Report
was completed and submitted to Mike Terraso.

EUROPE

Nederlands, Enron Wind - Alan Stringer reviewed monitoring data from soil and
groundwater investigation.  Identified that no further actions was required
in terms of soil and groundwater contamination.  He is also finalizing the
EHS up-grade requirements to meet local laws and regulations, using local EHS
management from Enron Wind in Nederlands and Germany to gather costs.  Will
produce final report by March 19th.  Report will provide details on needs,
who will be responsible for the tasks and costs.

All Assets - Alan Stringer and Bal Wong reviewed and submitted February 2001
EHS Performance Report to Houston.

ENRON GLOBAL ASSETS
(Central America, South America, India and Asia)

Panama, Bahia Las Minas (BLM) Stack Testing -  currently scheduled for mid
April, 2001.

Puerto Rico, San Juan Gas Remediation Project - Donnie Willmann and Bill
Curra participated in a weekly conference call with project team members to
discuss project status.   The agency approval of the Feasibility Study (FS)
is causing delays in obtaining the permits.  The agency was provided with the
FS in October, 2000.  San Juan Gas personnel are following up daily with the
agency about formal written approval. Approval would allow remediation to
begin.   Efforts continue to procure access agreements on adjoining property.

Bolivia, Transredes and GasOriente Boliviano - - Edgar Zuleta completed the
Crisis Management Plan.  A draft version was submitted for review to
Transredes and GasOriente Boliviano management.

EHS Performance Data - Edgar Zuleta revised the February 2001 EHS performance
data for Cuiaba and Transredes and submitted it to Gavin Dillingham to update
database. Also, Edgar requested missing EHS performance data for remaining
South America assets.

India, Dabhol Power Company  -  Alan Stringer is scheduled to participate
March 19 - 30 in an environmental audit at Dabhol Power Plant.

Guam, Marianas Energy Company - Bal Wong conducted a 1 hour training on Lock
Out/Tag Out (LOTO) Program.  Annual LOTO review lessons learned were
reviewed.  Bal reviewed and commented on the Continuous Emission Monitoring
Relative Accuracy Test Audit (RATA) test procedure.  The test will be
conducted on March 20 - 21, 2001.   The procedure was submitted to Guam EPA.
He also began the review of the Marianas Power Plant Crisis Management Plan.

ENRON ENERGY SERVICES

EES - Distributed Power Generation ) Gus Eghneim is continuing to provide
permitting support to the distributed power generation team.  Several
generation facilities are planned for year 2001.

Alabama, Mobile Energy Services Company ) Scott Watson has been coordinating
the implementation of  the EHS Transition Plan he prepared.   Also he will
conduct an EHS Audit at this facility the week of March 25th, 2001.   Ramiro
Garcia and Gus Eghneim are developing an environmental compliance Manual for
Mobile Energy Services.   This manual is based on the review of facility
environmental documents and permits.

Massachusetts, New Albany Power - Gus Eghneim is working to resolve the
environmental issues identified in the plant's 2000 audit report.   All, but
two issues will be resolved by March 26th, 2001. The work involves finalizing
the plant's environmental compliance manual.

Enron EHS Statistics Report ) Scott Watson updated the database reports for
Garden State and Daishowa Paper Mills.   Both facilities are under Enron
Industrial Makerts.

Eli Lilly Project )  Scott Watson, Henry Van and Bill Curra are preparing the
EHS Policies and Procedures Manuals and Training Program.  The Eli Lilly
account includes utility delivery service for 5 facilities.

GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL MARKETS

Quebec, Canada, Daishowa Pulp & Paper Co. ) Scott Watson and Gus Eghneim
prepared the EHS Audit Report (audit conducted Feb. 27 March 2).  The report
was submitted to the Transition Team.   Both participated in a Transition
Team meeting to discussed audit findings.

ENRON AMERICAS

Michigan, White Pine Energy, Ada Cogeneration Plant ) The U.S. EPA included
Ada Cogen Plant in its Section 126 rulemaking, adopted in January 2000.  This
rulemaking established emission limits for electric generation plants in 12
states in the North East. The EPA also included Ada Cogen Plant on the list
of plants required to reduce emissions under the EPA SIP call.  The Illinois
EPA is currently developing regulations to comply with the EPA SIP Call
requirements.  Under the Section 126 rulemaking and the proposed Illinois,s
SIP call regulations, Ada Cogen Plant  will be required to install Selective
Catalytic Reduction (SCR) by 2003 to meet stringent NOx emission limits.  At
an estimated capital cost of $5 million and an O&M cost of $500,000 per year,
the plant may be forced to shut down.

Gus Eghneim filed a petition with the U.S. EPA to exclude Ada Cogen Plant
from the Section 126 rulemaking.  The size of the plant and its operating
history were used as justification for the exemption.  If and when this
petition is approved, Gus Eghneim will file a similar petition with the
Illinois EPA to exclude Ada Cogen from the SIP Call Rulemaking.  A meeting
with the U.S. EPA will be scheduled in the next two weeks to discuss the
petition.

CAPITAL PROJECTS

Bahamas LNG (Project Calypso) - Don Stevens visited the proposed project site
in the Bahamas this week for purposes of conducting a limited Phase I
assessment of the property and projecting potential clean-up costs for
contamination.  Project developers will use the information to negotiate with
the seller, with the intent that the seller remediate the property before
Enron purchases it.

DEPARTMENT PROJECTS

Telework/NEPI Program ) Gavin Dillingham is meeting with HR Work Perks, Sally
Alvarez and Sarah Davis and NEPI,s Elham Shirazi concerning teleworking at
Enron. The meeting is to help familiarize Enron Work Perks with the current
telework pilot program that NEPI and HGAC is launching in the Houston area
and to see if Enron would like to participate in such a program. The
consulting to develop a telework program is provided as a free service
through federal government funding and HGAC and NEPI have been given the
federal funding.

Asset/Project Tracking Database -. Gavin Dillingham is currently enhancing
the Asset Tracking Database to include more information. The information
fields that are being added will track power plant capacity, liability
concerns, costs, operator, % ENE owned, actions and costs.

Sustainability Indicators and Benchmarking- Gavin Dillingham is currently
working with Lauren Iannarone in determining what
Sustainable/Environmental/Social indices Enron should work to be listed on.
They have just completed the initial stage of the project by determining the
benchmarks and indicators that Enron should follow to be considered a
responsible corporate citizen.

Conservation International Biodiversity Forum - Susan Worthen and Catherine
McKalip-Thompson are drafting an outline for "Making the Business Case" for
discussion with their workgroups.  It is intended to offer tools for various
stakeholders to use to assess the qualitative and quantitative value and risk
associated with incorporating biodiversity into oil and gas development.

Corporate Responsibility on the Internet Site - Susan Worthen is working with
Lauren Iannarone on the development/organization of a section on the Enron
web site for corporate responsibility.  Lauren is coordinating a meeting with
HR, Community Relations, Brandon Rigney, and me for the week of 03/26 to
outline content, etc.  Investor Relations has also expressed an interest in
linking to the corporate responsibility section or having it reside under
their section.

VOLUNTEER ACTIVITIES/COMMUNITY RELATIONS

Enron Earth Day Festival ) Gavin Dillingham had a meeting with Trash Bash
yesterday and today to discuss the bayou cleanup challenge coming up on March
31st. Currently, there is a committee that is looking for volunteers and is
coordinating the logistics of the clean up.  Our corporate challenge partners
have committed between 130 - 150 volunteers.

REGULATORY TECHNICAL ANALYSIS

Greenhouse Gas Technology Conference - Marc Phillips presented information at
a Greenhouse Gas Technology Conference on the methane reductions documented
by ETS under the EPA Natural Gas STAR Program and their potential use as
emission reduction credits.

Texas Grandfather Legislation - Marc Phillips has prepared cost estimates on
the impact of the Texas grandfather legislation on the pipeline industry and
ETS facilities and is participating in conference calls with industry groups
to present an industry position on the legislation.

ANSI's Proposed Z365 Standard for Ergonomics - Russell Tucker worked on the
API task force to assemble comments for the second public comment period for
the Z365 proposed ANSI standard. Addressing concerns in this proposed
standard has become more important in view of the demise of OSHA's ergonomics
final rule.

Participation in Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Survey - Russell Tucker has
established the process and information links necessary to record the weekly
data requested by the U.S. Department of Labor, BLS, for a survey of
occupational injuries and illnesses during 2001 for the ECT Strategic Value
Corp. A final report is due this Agency in January 2002.

ADVOCACY COORDINATION & COMMERCIAL SUPPORT

Air Quality/Multipollutant Strategy -- Carbon Dioxide Regulation -  Jeff
Keeler coordinated Enron's involvement in activities surrounding President
Bush's statement (in a letter to several Senators) that mandatory caps on CO2
emissions should not be included in any multipollutant approaches for the
power sector.  Jeff maintained communications with EPA, White House, and
congressional contacts on the subject, and advised our "Clean Power Group"
coalition and congressional staff on possible responses and future
strategies.  Jeff is working closely with Senate Environment Committee staff
to craft legislation that will still move forward on NOx, SO2 and mercury
while continuing to look at meaningful approaches to carbon reduction.

EPA Appointments - Jeff Keeler worked on gathering information and vetting
candidates withing Enron on two EPA appointments critical to Enron businesses
-- EPA Asst. Administrator for Air and Radiation and EPA Region 9
Administrator.   Final recommendations are being prepared for Enron to
communicate to the White House.

California Energy Crisis & Environmental Regulation -  ESG continued its
leadership in providing intelligence and analysis to commercial and
government affairs groups on environmental policy activities affecting the
California crisis.
Mary Schoen produced analysis of new California bills and executive actions
affecting permitting and environmental regulation of power generation
sources, and provided feedback to Enron commercial groups, government affairs
and regulators.  Mary also worked on further analysis of actions being taken
by state CARB officials and local authorities in the SCAQMD to potentially
revise air quality programs.
Stacey Bolton worked w/Janel Guererro and the California Crisis Team on
opportunities to enhance Enron's California messages with Enron's green
messaging and environmental business opportunities.

Trading Market Development - Stacey Bolton continued her leadership in
developing market-based systems for trading renewable energy credits:
PJM: Drafted a "strawman" detailing a credit trading program to submit to
PJM, asking them to form a working group.  Organizing a stakeholder meeting
for March 20th in Philadelphia to form a coalition to lobby for a credit
trading program.  Stakeholders include Community Energy, PG&E National Energy
Group, Green Mountain, Center for Resource Solutions, Penn Futures, National
Exchange Carriers and NCE-Pearson.
NePool: Submitted comments on an RFP that NePool is issuing for the
Generation Information System on March 21
Renewable Energy Desk: Coordinating with Elliot Mainzer of ENA West on
forming a team to respond "holistically" to the regulatory and public
relations/messaging needs of the new commercial venture.

Clean Power Product Development - Stacey Bolton worked on several initiatives
toward developing Enron commercial opportunities
PA C&I Negawatts Program:  Presented proposal for a C&I Negawatt program in
Pennsylvania to the Green-e Negawatt Subc.  Received clearance on conceptual
idea to present the proposal to the full Mid-Atlantic Advisory Committee on
Monday, March 19th.  If approved, we will work through the fine details of
the program w/ Green-e, submit it for final approval to their Green Power
Board, and launch the program this June.
Energy Efficiency Allowances:  Met with EES (Heather Mitchell and Elizabeth
Howley) regarding developing a proposal for energy efficiency savings to be
eligible as NOx allowances to the TNRCC.  Spoke with Bill Jordan at the TNRCC
regarding this issue, timeframe, and method for presenting a proposal to
them.  Also set a goal to attempt to get Negawatt Credits to trade on TX REC
and voluntary certificates of generation system.

Environmental Reporting/Compliance - Stacey Bolton worked with EES to advise
them on various reporting requirements:
CEC Annual Report:  EES submitted their annual report to the California
Energy Commission and Green-e on March 1st.  The CEC had several questions
regarding tying EES purchases to specific generators.  Worked w/ EPMI and EES
to help tie our purchase numbers (between EPMI, the APX and EES) in our
annual report in response to CEC's questions.
Patagonia & Fetzer:  Worked w/ Mike Smith and Peggy Mahoney to get them up to
speed on our disclosure requirements in CA (given that EES is no longer
delivering commodity to large customers) and that the CEC was okay w/ our
green tag product to Fetzer and Patagonia.

COMPETITIVE INTELLIGENCE

Commercial Opportunities
Abbott Laboratories:  Jeff Keeler forwarded to EES information about an
opportunity to provide energy/environmental outsource services to Abbott
Labs, based on contact with their head of energy/EHS operations at the GEMI
new members meeting.
Landauer Deal:  Stacey Bolton presented EES w/ a business opportunity to join
w/ a large real-estate development company to install solar panels and
distributed generation on large strip malls, starting in NY.  Organized a
call for next Wednesday to discuss potential partnership.
Greening the Enron Building: Stacey Bolton is assisting Enron Wind and the
East Desk forward an idea to be the first Fortune 500 company to "go 100%
green" in our headquarter building.  Facilities is interested in commodity as
well (wants to switch from Reliant).  Organizing meeting of internal
stakeholders (ENA, EES, Enron Wind) for next week to discuss full commodity
and outsourcing options coupled w/ green tags from our Enron Wind facility in
West Texas.
Wind supply in PA: Stacey  Bolton was contacted by Community Energy in PA
regarding a new wind facility w/ available credits.   Let EES renewable desk
know of this new green supply as an opportunity given their procurement of
green power responsibilities for New Power's 2% renewable obligation in PA.

Energy Efficiency/Renewable energy - Stacey Bolton informed EES and ENA about
$358 million in funding recently approved by New Jersey for new energy
efficiency and renewable energy programs.

EPA Diesel Sulfur Regulations - Jeff Keeler provided EGM with information on
the EPA's regulations requiring additional removal of sulfur content from
diesel gasoline.   New Diesel sulfur requirements will require significant
increased capital expenditures by refiners, which affects the EGM price curve
for fuels, as well as trading, risk management and origination opportunities
with refiner customers.  This information may also be the basis for exploring
new markets for cleaner diesel products.

Distributed Generation - Equity Investments - Jeff Keeler provided follow up
advice and analysis to Enron Principal Investments group on environmental
regulatory drivers affecting markets for distributed generation technologies
and federal/state incentive monies available for projects involving
distributed generation technologies.   Principal investments has made equity
investments in a number of new technologies, and is considering many future
investments -- environmental regulation is a significant driver for many of
these technologies.


Linda,

I found your email address on the internet so disregard the message I left on your cell. The following properties are the type of place I have in mind. I thought that these would give you a better idea the general concept I am looking for. I am starting to think that a townhouse / infill is a better way to go as opposed to an apartement style condo. I look forward to meeting you on Friday. Below are some MLS #'s of properties that interested me and my contact # in Red Deer / Calary.

Thanx

Chris Dorland

Cell 713-416-6694
Red Deer home 403-343-7086

MLS#'s

2164012
2164008
2164018
2164023
2165562
2180545
2180565
2180660
2178878
2161367
2166627
2179996

I have also heard a lot of good things about Garrison Woods and would like to check that development out.


When: Friday, October 12, 2001 2:00 PM-3:30 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where: TBD

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

This project kickoff is primarily for the business team, and will provide high level information on the team member roles, base functionality and timeline.


Josh - Susan Scott, legal, requested to fax her a copy of the Gallup/Rolls
Royce compressor PO  for review.

Her fax: 713-853-5425
phone: 713-853-0596

Let me know when it's been sent.

Thanks

JT


Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Pursuant to our discussions, I have told folks I am leaving the 30th.

I also told Naveed Ahmed (coal plant development group) that to the extent he needs help from me prior to Feb. 18th when I start at Hahn Loeser and Parks, I would be willing to do so on my own initiative with the hope of being retained as legal counsel should the project go forward.

I have also told people at EES if they have questions on matters they can call me at home for assistance, given the amount of institutional knowledge I have.

The understanding is that I am doing it on my own so that it should not give them any impression of resources that do not exist and I do not expect that there will be many requests anyway.

As to Indiana proceeding, I will file a letter saying we are not filing briefs.  Given the direction of the case, I don't think it is necessary.

The only matter that remains outstanding is filing a reply with respect to FE's plan to reduce the level of increase in the shopping credit which will negatively impact Enron's book of business since our contracts are based on a fixed price with the assumption that the shopping credit will go up as set forth in the schedule.  FE will probably file a response after I have left and a decision will need to be made as to whether to pursue this or not. I am certainly willing to follow this matter through on Enron's behalf with the understanding that I am doing it individually on a pro bono basis. I will apprise you of the next steps as they occur so you can decide how you want to handle it.

Janine


I've revised both the backgrounder and message point documents.


Greg --

Thanks again for really lighting them up last night.  Being the best guy in
11 years ain't bad.  It was fun for me to get to know you and look forward to
working together.

Vance

p.s.  Your restaurant list has my wife looking to expedite the finding of a
Houston babysitter!


Susan-

Doug has been on my computer for the past two days finishing his thesis, so
I haven't been able to write back.

Well-- if nothing else, at least you can practice your witty repartee with
him.  Did he write back?  That non-conference opponent excuse was lame.
Exactly who were the non-conference opponents--Rice, SMU, Slippery Rock...
Hmmm.  We need a little more information to give that credibility.

I have been studying like a nerd lately, so hopefully, finals won't be so
stressful this year.  I keep remebering that we gave that shower right
before my finals last semester.  That comforts me-- I know wasn't prepared
for any of them at that time and class had already ended.

Anyway, I just had a 15 minute conversation with the Time Warner Cable guy--
I called to pay my bill because I lost the paper copy-- first, he looked at
my address, saw it was near Hyde Park Bar and Grill-- and preceded to
disucss all of the wonderful menu items-- french fries, Reuben sandwich,
iced tea-- then I gave him my credit card number and he asked me if it was a
USAA card-- apparently you can tell by the first 4 digits-- 5416-- who knew?
  We talked about how great USAA is for 5 minutes.  Then he asked me if I
was in school in Austin-- so we talked about that...  When he finally
finsihed with me, I thought he was going to ask me out.  If it weren't for
Doug, I would have gone- he was quite a nice guy.

Anyway, it was refreshing considering how many idiots, jerks, assholes, etc.
work in the service industry.

Well, let me know what's going on.

Talk to you later.

-Corey

______________________________________________________________________________
_______
Get more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com


Does this make sense to you?  Seems like they may have the wrong person.  Can
you follow up?  Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 09/11/2000 12:59 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Margarite Cunningham @ ENRON                           09/07/2000
04:42 PM

To: Kay Lynn Buhler/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Belinda Luna/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrew
Lawrence/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John Sides/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Pager Request

Kay Lynn,

I understand that you are now incharge of ordering pagers for everyone who is
requesting one.

I need to request two skytel (2) way pagers for:

Belinda Luna
Sally Beck

They are both on the Training Team under Andy Lawrence:  company code: 011
Charge#103091

If you have any questions please give me a call.
thanks
margarite


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 11/17/2000
05:41 PM ---------------------------

Tarun Mukherjee <tmukherj@uno.edu> on 11/16/2000 10:04:30 AM
To: Vkamins@ect.enron.com
cc: gwhitney@uno.edu, wlane@uno.edu
Subject: Moffett Chair

Dear Dr. Kaminski,

I invite you to apply  for the  recently announced endowed chair position in
our department. The position, James R. Moffett Chair, is named after the CEO
of Freeport McMoran. You come highly recommended by John martin of Baylor
whose opinion we value greatly.

The attached file provides more information regarding the required
qualification and responsibilities of the Chair.  If you have any question,
please feel free to contact me (I am co-chair of the search committee),
Professor Gerald Whitney (gwhitney@uno.edu, Co-chair of the search
committee), or Dr. Walter (Dub) Lane (wlane@uno.edu, the Department Head).

We look forward to receiving your application soon.

Tarun K. Mukherjee
Professor of Finance and Co-Chair, James R. Moffett Search Committee
Department of Economics and Finance
University of New Orleans
New Orleans, LA 70148
(504)280-7146-Work
(504)-280-6397--Fax

 - Ad for Moffett Chair-.doc


just messing with you.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:22 PM
To:	Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:	RE:

i am not grilling you and i am not an angry person at all.  are you kidding?

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 3:17 PM
To: erichardson@sarofim.com
Subject: RE:

i am not fighting with you at all.  you are just grilling me.  you are an
angry person.

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Friday, October 26, 2001 3:00 PM
   To:     Lenhart, Matthew
   Subject:  RE:

   whatever, i did not flip out.  i remember everything.  stop fighting
   with
   me.

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
   Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 3:00 PM
   To: erichardson@sarofim.com
   Subject: RE:

   i was sober and i remember how it went down.  i said one rude thing in
   the
   car and that was it.  you were just going nuts and wouldn't let it die.
   you kept flipping out on me.

       -----Original Message-----
      From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
      Sent:   Friday, October 26, 2001 2:49 PM
      To:     Lenhart, Matthew
      Subject:  RE:

      no, that's wrong.  you just kept saying one rude thing after another
      which
      bothered me.  it doesn't matter.  the point is that it should not be
   so
      difficult for you to not be rude.

      -----Original Message-----
      From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
      Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:48 PM
      To: erichardson@sarofim.com
      Subject: RE:

       only one thing i said was rude, which i apologized for, and you
      wouldn't
      let it die.  most of the stuff was started by you.  you were just
      venting
      frustration you weren't able to communicate when you're sober.

          -----Original Message-----
         From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
         Sent:   Friday, October 26, 2001 2:41 PM
         To:     Lenhart, Matthew
         Subject:  RE:

         i only rolled back over once.  i said i was sorry for saying i
   wished
         you
         were dead, i was just kidding, and i wouldn't have to vent for so
      long
         if
         you wouldn't give me reasons to.  some of the things you said last
      night
         were pretty rude.

         -----Original Message-----
         From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
         Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:37 PM
         To: erichardson@sarofim.com
         Subject: RE:

         you kept rolling back over and laying into me.  you are the one
   who
      said
         you wished i was dead.  you went crazy.  you were pissed all
   night.
      you
         were venting on a soap box for about 2 hours.

             -----Original Message-----
            From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
            Sent:   Friday, October 26, 2001 2:33 PM
            To:     Lenhart, Matthew
            Subject:  RE:

            i was not going nuts.  i was trying to go to sleep and you kept
         bringing
            it
            up.  you're nice, but you have an attitude.  very cocky.

            -----Original Message-----
            From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
   [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
            Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:42 PM
            To: erichardson@sarofim.com
            Subject: RE:

            i was being nice.  you kept starting it and then blaming it on
   me.
         you
            were going nuts.

                -----Original Message-----
               From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
               Sent:   Friday, October 26, 2001 1:03 PM
               To:     Lenhart, Matthew
               Subject:  RE:

               you deserved it b/c you are a jerk.  you really need to
   start
         being
               nicer.

               -----Original Message-----
               From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
      [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
               Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:37 PM
               To: erichardson@sarofim.com
               Subject: RE:

               you were letting me have it.  i deserved some of it b/c i
   made
         some
            bad
               jokes, but overall you were pretty brutal.  i think i am
      heading
         to
               baton
               rouge for the game this weekend instead of partying for
      halloween.

                   -----Original Message-----
                  From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
                  Sent:   Friday, October 26, 2001 12:28 PM
                  To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                  Subject:  RE:

                  no.   why was i mad?

                  -----Original Message-----
                  From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
         [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                  Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:29 PM
                  To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                  Subject: RE:

                  you still mad at me?  you were pissed last night.

                      -----Original Message-----
                     From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>
   @ENRON
                     Sent:   Thursday, October 25, 2001 1:50 PM
                     To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                     Subject:

                     you better be getting excited about dinner.  i'm not
      taking
         you
            if
                  you
                     aren't.

   **********************************************************************
                  This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its
      relevant
               affiliate
                  and
                  may contain confidential and privileged material for the
      sole
         use
            of
               the
                  intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or
            disclosure
               by
                  others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
   intended
            recipient
               (or
                  authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact
   the
            sender
               or
                  reply
                  to Enron Corp. at
   enron.messaging.administration@enron.com
      and
            delete
                  all
                  copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
      hereto)
            are
               not
                  intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not
   create
      or
               evidence
                  a
                  binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or
   any
      of
            its
                  affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other
   party,
      and
         may
               not
                  be
                  relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by
   estoppel
      or
               otherwise.
                  Thank you.

   **********************************************************************


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 07/27/2000
05:40 PM ---------------------------

Zimin Lu
07/27/2000 03:08 PM
To: Anjam Ahmad/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT (bcc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT)
Subject: Re: Aluminium Asian Digital Options

Anjam,

We can use moment matching to find the "effective" volatility and dividend
yield for the average.
Then we can apply the European digital option formula.   Attached please find
the c-code I did
for  Asian spread option, when I find the effective vol and drift for both
averages then find the option
value by calling the European spread option.  You can do just the same for
the Asian digital option.

It would be nice to do a Monte-Carlo, just checking the accuracy of the
approximation.

It was nice to have you here, we are impressed by the work you have done.
Keep up the good work.

Zimin

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp. - Europe

	From:  Anjam Ahmad                           07/27/2000 10:14 AM

To: Zimin Lu/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Aluminium Asian Digital Options

Hi Zimin,

Russell Placket of MG Metals just talked to me about the issue of pricing a
strip of twelve monthly Asian digital options on LME aluminium.  As I
understand, the payoff to the customer is a fixed cash amount that wil be
paid if the average of the closing prices of aluminium for a month are
greater than the strike agreed in advance, where holiday days do not
contribute to the average.

Russell mentioned that this would be a set of 12 monthly options starting in
Jan-01, and that the LME price for Jan-01 of $1572.5 (which is the future
converging to the spot price on the 3rd Wednesday in Jan 01) can be used as a
proxy/estimate for the average for the month.

Do you have a model for asian digitals or should I proceed with Monte Carlo
to price this, maybe using European digital option model as control variate?

Thanks,

Anjam
x35383


sorry - confusion - tom alonso had the williams deal with APB down as a
purchase, but he's changing it to a sale just in the interest of checking out
now. Deal # is 534492

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
02/28/2001 03:05 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: apb

do you know the williams deal number?

   Kate Symes @ ECT                02/28/2001 04:56 PM

To: Kerri Thompson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: apb

Yes - it's a Puget deal. I'm trying to contact Sean right now to see if he
and Diana overlapped on these deals. I only see them written once in his
trade log, but I'm auditing the second two to find out who entered them.

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
02/28/2001 02:54 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: apb

534497 is a pudget deal?

   Kate Symes @ ECT                02/28/2001 04:42 PM

To: Kerri Thompson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: apb

Verified with Diana and Sean - these should be APB.

and the Williams deal should be resolved - deal # is 534497

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
02/28/2001 02:39 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: apb

i have 2 more things besides the williams deal.  apb is trying to leave thats
why i was trying to get these deals resolved.

534496
534497

apb does not recognize, these may be duplicated deals that are already in the
system.

thanks


Hi Bijan -

Yes, received it just fine.

Ken has been out of the country since you sent the e-mail.

Rosalee

"A.BIJAN GHODSTINAT" <BIJANGH2000@TAVANA.NET> on 10/02/2000 11:53:05 AM
To: <kenneth.lay@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: this is a test message to Rosalie

Dear Rosalie: I sent an email to Ken on 9-26.This  is a follow up test.Pls
confirm if you receive this message.Thanks.  Bijan


Please do not send me these messages as I do not have time to read them.
Mark


This explains a lot.  Lets talk at 9 on what the status of the case is--find
some trade press articles first thing mon. AM and don't bug Janet quite yet.
Sounds like Bill has arranged a briefing by the NB people for our benefit
(and probably an argument about whether we should intervene).  Thanks.  DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 04/08/2000
10:26 AM ---------------------------
Meeting Confirmation
From: Virginia O'Neill on 04/07/2000 10:29 AM
To: Dave Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay
Miller/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc: Deb Cappiello/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Martha Benner/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sharon
Solon/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
Subject: NBPL Rate Case

Larry DeRoin now indicates that they are available to meet next Monday
morning, April 10, to discuss the NBPL Rate case.  The meeting will take
place following Stan's Monday morning meeting which generally concludes at
10:00 AM.  Mary Kay, Bill is aware that you will be out on Monday -- someone
will up-date you following the meeting.

The following meeting has been confirmed:

 Topic:   NBPL Rate Case
 Date:   Monday, April 10
 Time:   10:00 AM
 Meeting Location: Cordes' Conference Room

Additional information:


Stephanie -

We are ready to finalize the Caminus NDA.  The change reflected in the attached is acceptable.  Please finalize when you have a chance.

Thanks.

Mark

-----Original Message-----
From: Allario, John
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 11:18 AM
To: Greenberg, Mark
Cc: Jones, Tana; Panus, Stephanie
Subject: FW: meeting & NDA

Mark

Caminus took out reference to EOL.   Would this be too broad?   How can we accommodate their wishes below?
-john

-----Original Message-----
From: Masiello, Ralph [mailto:ralph.masiello@caminus.com]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 10:44 AM
To: Allario, John
Subject: RE: meeting & NDA

Our attorney was fine with the NDA except that by restricting it to
information about the Enron On Line website, it would not cover material
which Caminus might disclose to you in that meeting.

Here it is back with a simple change to make it symmetric


The approval process initiated in 1998 for all meeting and event expenditures
in excess of $5,000 has enabled ENA to better assess the business value of
events, accurately track our activities and save money.  These events include
customer and employee meetings, and trade shows.

ENA has made some modifications to the process, which are described in this
memo.

The $5,000 threshold remains in effect for all customer events.  However, the
threshold for approval for employee meetings and events has been lowered to
$2,000, and some additional requirements must be met prior to approval.

Please be sure to follow the procedures described below for all meetings and
events, so we can continue to successfully manage these events.

1) Prior to making any commitments to customers or vendors, all customer
events with anticipated costs in excess of $5,000, and all employee events
with anticipated costs in excess of $2,000 must be reviewed by the ENA Public
Relations (PR) department and approved by the ENA Office of the Chairman

2) The PR department will handle the site search and hotel contract
negotiations for all such events.  Once this is completed, the PR department
will work with you to plan and produce your event in its entirety; or they
can provide as much or as little assistance as you require. The PR department
will be responsible for helping you achieve the best value for your program
and ENA.

3) A completed expenditure request form (see attached) and supporting
documentation is required for each event.  Employee meetings require a
detailed agenda as part of the event documentation prior to approval.  Please
submit the completed expenditure request form and documentation to the PR
department at EB 3642, or work with PR department employees to complete the
form.

4) After PR review, the expenditure will be submitted to the ENA Office of
the Chairman for final approval.

Additionally, the PR department can assist in the procurement of tickets for
various local sporting events and concerts.

If you have any questions regarding this process, would like assistance
planning an event, or need tickets for a Houston event, please contact Dorie
Hitchcock in the PR department at (713) 853-6978.

Thank you for your cooperation.


Yan,

Please make the PGE daily report (#26) available on your website.  Thanks.

Mat


I'll keep that in mind...

-----Original Message-----
From: eldon sellers [mailto:eldon@direcpc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 3:43 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: RE:

Winning isn't everything, but it beats losing.  Also, I don't enjoy playing against people who always lose--unless I'm playing ping pong, golf or Spades.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@ENRON.com]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 1:05 PM
To: Nancy Sellers (E-mail); eldon sellers (E-mail)
Subject:

Thanks again for your gracious hospitality over the weekend and a very
happy anniversary.  Eldon, you were particularly nice to let me win at
just about everything we did.

How much do I owe you for me and Prentice for the golf?

Best,
Jeff

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Hire Date:  05/01/00
Social:  *********
P00509171

<Embedded Outlook Message Attachment>
<Embedded Outlook Message Attachment>
<Embedded Outlook Message Attachment>


Mark:  I left you a voice mail last week about the comments from IT about the
"Enron Corp. mandate" from Jim Derrick  regarding negotiation of these
agreements.  Have you a solution?  Sara


As you now know, I did not fly to BA from Sao Paulo.  Please let me know if
you would like to set up a conference call (from Houston) or wait for me to
return to Sao Paulo.  Sara

From: Rodolfo Freyre AT ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@CCMAIL on 08/20/99 12:44 AM
To: Sara Shackleton@ECT
cc: "John J Shoobridge/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT" AT ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@CCMAIL,
Federico Cerisoli AT ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@CCMAIL
Subject: Trip to BA

I heard either you or Susan Bailey are coming tomorrow to BA. It would be
great if we could get some time together and go over the MSAs so you can
explain to John and I how this transaction works.

Let me know if you will be available some time tomorrow.

Regards,

Rolo


Gerald,

I see that these were not forwarded to you, but that Kris Johnon claims to
have already forwarded copies of the contracts to Enron's attorney, Do you
have these contracts already?

What is your comfort level as to the nature of these documents and your
personal time constraints to review and negotiate?  I've been working with
Clark Thompson and Jay Sonnenberg at Bracewell and would be happy to help get
them involved if you think it helpful or advisable.

Please let me know.

Steve
----- Forwarded by Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT on 01/09/2001 10:23 AM -----

	Dwight Beach
	01/09/2001 10:16 AM

		 To: Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Van
Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Reagan Rorschach/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Glenn Wright/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Contracts for ash and coal

---------------------- Forwarded by Dwight Beach/HOU/ECT on 01/09/2001 10:15
AM ---------------------------

"Johnson, Kris" <KrisJohnson@Cogentrix.com> on 01/09/2001 10:10:13 AM
To: "'Dwight.Beach@enron.com'" <Dwight.Beach@enron.com>,
"'gerald.nemec@enron.com'" <gerald.nemec@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Contracts for ash and coal

Dwight:

Here are the contracts as submitted yesterday with the pricing change to the
Level 3 Capacity in ash handling as mentioned earlier today.  I have
forwarded a copy of the contracts to your attorney for his review as well as
a set to ReUse's attorney.  I will contact you this afternoon to make sure
you received the contracts, have any questions and see what the next steps
involve.  If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.

Kris Johnson
 <<#599831 v1 - Agreement for Ash Removal Services for Lumberton Power.doc>>
 <<#599837 v1 - Agreement for Ash Removal Services for Elizabethtown
Power.doc>>  <<Elizabethtown - Coal Hauling Agreement.doc>>  <<Lumberton -
Coal Hauling Agreement Revised.doc>>

 - #599831 v1 - Agreement for Ash Removal Services for Lumberton Power.doc
 - #599837 v1 - Agreement for Ash Removal Services for Elizabethtown Power.doc
 - Elizabethtown - Coal Hauling Agreement.doc
 - Lumberton - Coal Hauling Agreement Revised.doc


Nancy, I attempted earlier to send you the message below, without success.  Hopefully, this one will get through.  Jim
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tom Henninger <thenninger@mail.law.utexas.edu>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Tom+20Henninger+20+3Cthenninger+40mail+2Elaw+2Eutexas+2Eedu+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, September 26, 2001 4:54 PM
To:	Derrick Jr., James
Subject:	Re: Friday Executive Committee Meeting

Hi, Jim--Stephanie let us know.  I'm sorry we won't get to see you, but
good luck at your board meeting, and we'll look forward to visiting in
November, if not before.

>Nancy and Tom, I received notice today that a company of which I am a
>director has scheduled a special board meeting for this Friday afternoon
>on the east coast.  I will be unable, therefore, to be in Austin for the
>Executive Committee Meeting.  Please convey my regrets and best wishes
>to those who attend.  All the best.  Jim
>
>
>**********************************************************************
>This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
>and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
>the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
>others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
>authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
>reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
>delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto)
>are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or
>evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of
>its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
>be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
>otherwise. Thank you.
>**********************************************************************


Hallo Mark,

thank you for the file.

In a first analysis I see duplicate records and a small time jitter, but not
a  big time jump.

Best regards,

Clemens W"ste

ENRON Wind


Diane, I will definitely show this to Ken, but he has a Dain Rauscher
presentation near the Galleria at 8:00 a.m. that morning, so I know he can't
attend.

Rosie

Diane Bazelides@AZURIX
08/22/2000 03:01 PM
To: Carol Hensley/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Kim Bacon/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, John
Ambler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Amanda K
Martin/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lou
Potempa/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jan Johnson/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Karen S
Owens@ees@EES, Joseph W Sutton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Hardie
Davis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rex Rogers/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kenneth
Lay/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Elizabeth Ivers/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, John
Ale/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Russell Baumbach/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Cliff
Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Habiba Bayi/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kathleen
Blankenship/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Rebecca Carter/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sarah
Palmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, James Derrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Hermann/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Gene
Humphrey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tod Lindholm/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Andrea Mainelli/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Terry Owens/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Arch Payne/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, James
Prentice/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, David Pruner/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Dave
Schafer/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Elizabeth Tilney/HOU/EES@EES, Rachael
Tobor/HOU/EES@EES, Michael Wood/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, John
Wodraska/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Norma Tidrow/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Anita
Piat/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Kathlene Neal/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX
cc:
Subject: Alzheimer's Research Update

On September 19th Dr. Bill Thies, vice president of medical and scientific
affairs for the national Alzheimer's Association, will be in Houston to
provide an update on some of the new and successful research underway for
Alzheimer's disease.  He'll also be meeting with local reseachers to learn
what they're doing in order to support and potentially fund their work.
Since all of you have been such great supporters of our efforts to raise
funds for this very cause, Phil and I are hosting a breakfast so you can hear
firsthand how your money is being spent.  No pledge cards will be handed out
at the door--just juice, coffee and maybe a bagel.  Please join us to hear an
update from Dr. Thies on September  19 from 7:00 to 8:00 a.m. in the Enron
Building, Room 49C1.  Please RSVP to Adriana Wynn at X55176.


Here is a discussion outline for this coming  week.? I've put at the very end
of the document a breakdown of the  remaining topics for the fall semester.?
It's incredible, only 6 meeting  times before the Christmas break.?
?
See ya,
?
Bobby
 - NEON Roaring 2.doc


This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.

Your message has been successfully relayed to the following recipients, but the requested delivery status notifications may not be generated by the destination.

       aaziz@shearman.com

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TJONES>
To: aaziz@shearman.com
Date: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 11:20:24 GMT
Subject:

	 <<ETA (6-9-00).doc>> 	 <<PA (6-9-00).doc>> 	 <<ENA Financial
GTC.doc>> 	 <<ENA Financial GTC (Credit).doc>> 	 <<Canada ENA
Financial GTC.doc>> 	 <<Canada ENA Financial GTC (Credit).doc>>
 <<CAN Phy GTC.doc>>  <<Firm GTC version2(credit).doc>>  <<Firm GTC
version2.doc>>  <<Spot GTC version 2 (credit).doc>>  <<Spot GTC version
2.doc>>  <<EPMI Power GTC (credit).doc>>  <<EPMI Power GTC.doc>>


---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 02/21/2001 12:02 PM
---------------------------

Jason Bass <JBass@stdauto.com> on 02/21/2001 12:12:06 PM
To: Eric.Bass@enron.com
cc:
Subject: RE: My new work email

Ok, we are on.? Can you come to the Papasitos at 290 and the Beltway.? It is
actually about 4 miles East of the beltway.? Basically if you are coming down
290 from downtown it would be on your right about 4 miles before the Belt.?
Let me know.

?-----Original Message-----
From: ? Eric.Bass@enron.com [mailto:Eric.Bass@enron.com]
Sent:?? Wednesday, February 21, 2001 11:12 AM
To:???? JBass@stdauto.com
Subject:??????? RE: My new work email

we were thinking papasitos (we can meet somewhere closer to you this time)
again at around 8

Jason Bass <JBass@stdauto.com> on 02/21/2001 11:22:45 AM

To:?? Eric.Bass@enron.com
cc:
Subject:? RE: My new work email

The new job is going great so far.? I am in training currently.? I will ask
Donnita about dinner. I think it should be fine, I just can't remember if
anything is planned as of yet.? What time and where would you want to go?

?-----Original Message-----
From:?? Eric.Bass@enron.com [mailto:Eric.Bass@enron.com]
Sent:?? Wednesday, February 21, 2001 10:12 AM
To:???? JBass@stdauto.com
Subject:??????? Re: My new work email

hey jason,

how is the new job?? shanna and I would like to know if you and donnita
want to do dinner again this friday? let me know

-e

Jason Bass <JBass@stdauto.com> on 02/21/2001 10:11:30 AM

To:
cc:
Subject:? My new work email

Just wanted to let you know my new work email address.

Jason


please open the attached document.


Today's Washington Post contains a favorable comment on negawatts attributed
to House Energy & Commerce Committee Chairman Tauzin, following efforts we
made yesterday with the Chairman and his staff, both directly and via our
consultants.  The Post article reads, "In the coming months, Tauzin said,
Congress will take steps to allow consumers to sell power back to their local
energy grids."  We, of course, will continue to push for a version of this
concept that keeps this process open to multiple buyers and sellers, not just
the local utility.  The article dovetails with information directly from
Chairman Tauzin and Chairman Barton that they will continue to push our
demand buydown proposal, although we are working with them to shore up
support on the committee in the face of opposition from the usual suspects.


Here is what I said.

Jim


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 09/28/2000 03:45 PM
---------------------------

Christopher F Calger
09/25/2000 08:00 AM
To: James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris H
Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Michael McDonald/SF/ECT@ECT,
Laird Dyer/SF/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: California Strategy RE: PG&E

Thanks Jim.  ENA is very interested in this topic.  I was talking with Mona
last week about my view that a strategy with PG&E should be supportive, not
adversarial.    ENA is extremely interested in a gas management position with
PG&E and they have made it clear to us that our public positions against them
are a significant commercial issue.  I will spend some time with Portland and
SF to get an ENA consensus on these points.

Chris

James D Steffes@EES
09/21/2000 09:28 PM
To: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris H
Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: California Strategy RE:  PG&E

FYI.

If you are not aware, PG&E is pushing for immediate end of their retail rate
cap (so they can collect wholesale energy costs).

EES is considering its positions in that matter to prepare for CPUC and
legislative proceedings.

I want to make sure that you are aware of these internal discussions.  Key
from EPMI include (1) endorse Cal ISO report conclusions, (2) competititve
default supplier, (3) increasing rate freeze for all customers, and (4)
transfer of PG&E Hydro to affiliate at $2.8B (to offset current
undercollection).

Please let me know if these positions make sense to you.  While I think that
our general position is retail volatility, given the current situation in
SDG&E that is simply impossible politically.

Please feel free to call.

Jim

---------------------- Forwarded by James D Steffes/HOU/EES on 09/21/2000
10:39 PM ---------------------------
From: Harry Kingerski@ENRON on 09/21/2000 03:54 PM
To: James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES
cc: Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES
Subject:

I met with Dennis Benevides, Jim Wood and Scott Gahn about the PG&E strategy
we discussed and the EES perspective.  Suggestions:

Endorse the recent CAL ISO report on causes of the problem (no utility
forward buying, no demand responsiveness, etc) and say, with a few tweaks,
their proposals were on target.

Get CTC roll-off no earlier than Spring '01.  Retroactive roll-off would be
devastating.

Use PG&E $15 billion exposure as leverage to get competitive default supplier
in place (get them out of merchant supply).

Impose a stair-step shape on the rate increase, to prompt customer migration.

Keep PG&E somewhat at risk for wholesale cost recovery, delay recovery of
under-recoveries until out years.

Keep rate freeze (which is preferable to rate cap) to as short a period as
possible, post '01.

Here is a rework of Jim's bullet points to incorporate these thoughts:
  Keep in mind the numbers are all just placeholders and are not meant to be
definitive.  Once we start to hone in on the concept, we can develop the
right numbers.

From a retail perspective, this blends protection of the book with
advancement of new market opportunity.  I may still get more feedback from
the EES guys, but wanted to give you what I got so far.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 11/10/2000
01:29 PM ---------------------------

Carrie Miller <cmiller@rice.edu> on 11/10/2000 10:31:25 AM
To: (Recipient list suppressed)
cc: castro@rice.edu, spradlin@rice.edu
Subject: Rice University ALP program -- December 1st deadline

On behalf of the Jones Graduate School at Rice University, we would like to
thank all of the company representatives who have submitted Action Learning
Project (ALP) proposals. Currently, the ALP faculty committee is reviewing
all proposals received.

We also want to remind those who are planning to submit proposals of our
December 1st deadline. Please keep us updated on the status of your project.
We are happy to answer any questions or provide assistance.

Our goal is to have a good mix of projects from a variety of companies, and
we are also pleased to accept multiple projects from one company. Thus far,
many of our proposals are marketing and/or strategy related. To increase the
diversity of projects, we are especially looking for ideas that give our
students the opportunity to utilize finance skills. Of course, an ideal
project is one that allows a student to use multiple skills.

Again, thank you for your continued interest in Rice University and the Jones
School ALP program.

Carrie Miller???????????????????????????????????????????Pam
Castro??????????????????????
Director of MBA Program?????????????????????????MBA Program Associate
Phone:? (713) 348-5260??????????????????????????????????Phone: (713) 348-6223
Fax:? (713) 348-5251????????????????????????????????????Fax: (713) 348-5251?
E-mail:? cmiller@rice.edu???????????????????????????????E-mail:?
castro@rice.edu


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 04/12/2000 09:18
AM ---------------------------

	From:  Colleen Sullivan                           04/12/2000 08:44 AM

To: Steve Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Oliver/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: CES - Term Sell for Dayton Power Light on TCO - PLEASE READ

Can you help with this Dayton issue?  This is the one we discussed where
Dayton is saying there is a fixed price and we have it in the system at
index.  Can I get a list of all Dayton sales for CES so I can try to match
them up?

We need to determine if this is another data entry error, or if CES provided
us with incorrect data, or if Dayton is wrong and this really is an index
deal.
Thanks for your help.

---------------------- Forwarded by Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT on 04/12/2000
08:41 AM ---------------------------

Joan Veselack@ENRON
04/11/2000 04:59 PM
To: Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly
Johnson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT,
vlamadr@enron.com, Jeff A Crook/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: CES - Term Sell for Dayton Power Light on TCO - PLEASE READ

This deal haunts us every month. Need someone to verify that CES GMS pricing
equals Enron's Sitara pricing.

Just a reminder, the GMS report I used from CES system only had volumes and
no pricing. I ensured the physical volumes were correct. Commerical still
needs to verify the pricing on the deals. I don't think this has been done
yet.

CES DEAL TICKETS
gms ticket # = s-dpl-0070
term = 12/1/98 to 5/1/2001
volume = 5000

gms ticket # = s-dpl-0079
term = 12/1/99 to 5/1/200
volume = 5000

ENA DEAL TICKETS
135702 = 5000.
It appears I changed volume to 0 on 2/29

145321 = 10,000
This ticket has been used for the total 10,000. This may be incorrect. (April
forward deal # is 227296).

The physical total volume is correct in Sitara, not sure about the pricing.

Thank you for your assistance.


PLEASE READ THIS IMPORTANT INFORMATION CONCERNING THE ENRON STOCK FUND IN THE ENRON CORP. SAVINGS AND ESOP PLANS

On Friday, January 11, trading of Enron stock was suspended on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE).  All Savings and ESOP Plan transactions, including 401(k) payroll contributions,  involving this fund were placed in a pending status until trading resumed.

As announced by Enron's Office of the Chair on Wednesday, January 16, Enron stock would now be traded Over The Counter (OTC).  Upon receiving this information, work began immediately to develop a process that allows for OTC trades in the plans.

On Thursday, January 17, Enron initiated a process to facilitate OTC trades of Enron stock inside the 401(k) and ESOP and all pending transactions were processed using Thursday's closing price.

Now that trading has resumed, we urge you to review your investment elections to ensure that they are consistent with your investment goals.

As things change, we will continue to update you.

Enron Benefits Department


Stacy,

I have three questions about the attached letter.

1. Are we doing this transaction as ENA or ENA Upstream?
2. Are the confirms in the name of ENA? The August - October deals were done between ENA Upstream and Linder.
3. Are the confirmations under GTC Spot? I thought they were going to be GTC FIRM.

If you could get back to me regarding these questions, I would appreciate it.

Judy

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dickson, Stacy E.
Sent:	Wednesday, August 08, 2001 4:18 PM
To:	Ferries, Nelson
Cc:	Williams, Jason R (Credit); Wallumrod, Ellen; Thorne, Judy
Subject:	Draft Linde rOil Prepay Letter

Attached please find the above-referenced letter.  I understand that the confirmations referenced in the letter will go out shortly.

Stacy Dickson Granmayeh
Senior Counsel
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3879
Houston, Texas  77002

Phone (713) 853-5705
Fax (713) 646-3490
Stacy.E.Dickson@enron.com

 << File: LinderOil.doc >>


I did vote for the new sports arena.

AND, I'm sending the latest schedule to the lawyer today.  I will wait till
after lunch to send it in case you guys have any more input.


March 31, 2001 is my last day at Enron.  My years at Enron has been a very
exciting and challenging period in my life.  Nevertheless, I,m very excited
to be moving on to new things as well.  I shall miss many of the good people
there that I have had the honor to work with.  As of the beginning of April
my Enron address will be invalid, please contact me using the below added
means.

Tom Delaney
1929 E. Seminole Dr.
Phoenix, Arizona 85022
TomDelaneyAZ@aol.com
         602-321-5017


i loved them in that i thought they were going to go up...i think they still
might

  3 weeks ago  now
short term very bullish  neutral
medium term neutral   neutral
longer term neutral   bearish

From: Jennifer Fraser/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/06/2001 11:34 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE:

what changed your mind re 02 and 03 --2 weeks ago you told me you loved
them....why are bearish out the back?

Jen Fraser
Enron Global Markets Fundamentals
713-853-4759

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Arnold, John
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 5:03 PM
To: Fraser, Jennifer
Subject: Re:

  What it's trading  what I think it's really worth
apr oct   540    500
nov mar 547    375
cal 2  491    400
cal 3   460    325

Obviously most bearish the further out you go.  However, the game right now
is not sell and hold...although it will be soon.  The game is where will it
be tomorrow and next week and next month.  The market is structurally short
term gas thanks to our friends from california.  where ca is buying power,
williams and calpine and dynegy dont care of the gas costs 450 or 475 or 500
or 525.  irrelevant.  so term is not going down in the short term unless the
front comes into the 400's and scares some producers to start hedging or we
or el paso can find fixed price lng to the tune of 250,000 a day for 10 years.

From: Jennifer Fraser/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/06/2001 10:37 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

what are your thoughts on

ap-oct
nov-mar
02
03

price levels and outlooks
 thanks
Jen Fraser
713-853-4759


I promised to send you the arbitration case we discussed. It's IP Timberlands
Operating Co. Ltd. v Denmiss Corp., 726 So.2d 96 (Miss. 1998). Please send me
the cite to the case you were referring to.

Thanks


Don -

I recommend putting the attached e-mails and attachments in the DD room.
We've also had verbal discussions with the IEPA to verify that the retest can
be postponed.  It can.

Mitch

michelle.april@ps.ge.com on 09/28/2000 04:26:28 PM
To: mitch.robinson@enron.com, ross.newlin@enron.com
cc:

Subject: FW: Lincoln Center Improvements

Mitch and Ross,

Please see Mike's responses below the question asked.  If you have any
questions, please let me or Mike know.

Michelle

From: Mike Murphy [FAX:+1 (314) 579-7171] On Behalf Of Murphy, Mike J
(PS, GI&FS)
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2000 4:24 PM
To: April, Michelle J (PS, ASD)
Subject: RE: Lincoln Center Improvements

Michelle

I have made my comments to each of Mitch's questions.

Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: April, Michelle J (PS, ASD)
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2000 3:05 PM
To: Murphy, Mike J (PS, GI&FS)
Subject: RE: Lincoln Center Improvements

-----Original Message-----
From: Mitch.Robinson@enron.com [mailto:Mitch.Robinson@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2000 1:32 PM
To: michelle.april@ps.ge.com
Cc: Ross.Newlin@enron.com; Merle.Churchill@enron.com
Subject: Lincoln Center Improvements

Michelle -

Please forward to Mike Murphy.  In general, the schedule is acceptable.
Please work with Merle on the details.  Can you or Mike confirm my
understanding of the following?

1.  Though the units ran within limits on NOx and CO throughout the summer,
GE believes that the performance will be enhanced with the attached
modifications (i.e. NOx will be reduced even further to the 7.5-8.5 ppm
range).

Response:  The GE target will be to have NOx at 7.5-8.5 range. In addition
the expectation is that CO will also be around 10ppm at Base load
conditions.

2.  The liners will have their dilution holes resized.  Will the secondary
nozzles also be modified, or is this not required?

Response:  The secondary nozzles will be modified to meet the new group
number change which will increase the effective area. This is an engineering
requirement. In addition the primary nozzle effective are will change with
the new part numbers. The liner dilution hole change will be standard across
all the units.

3.  You can postpone the retest until the next expected run season
(December/January).

Response:  The retest could be delayed until the winter peak season but in
the event that a unit was run after modification without a test, the risk of
compliance would be to Enron. GE feels very strongly that a reliable
operation of the unit would include retest as soon as practical after
modifications.  In the event the units will not run until 2Q 2001, the
abiity of GE to respond to the site need may be in jeopardy due to the high
number of new unit start ups.

4.  This change will not limit the ability to run prior to the scheduled
test, in the event of an unexpected run call.

Response:  The units would be available to run, but the operator may not
know where the unit would be in a regards to compliance.  We are also trying
to bring the unit back to a nominal firing temperature. The other point to
consider is whether or not you need to alert the EPA of the modification and
what your requirements are with that entity.

5.  Enron or Des Plaines Green Land Development (Lincoln Center) will not
incur any financial obligations as a result of the change-out.

Response:  GE will be paying for all labor, tools and shop work necessary to
perform the modifications, but Enron or Des Plaines Green Land Development
would be responsible for all fuel costs, electrical costs and operator
costs.

Thanks for your diligence, and please let the GE team know that I
appreciate the effort given to the Lincoln plant.  Regarding both the
generator change-out and the emissions effort, I have no complaints with
GE's performance.

Regards,

Mitch

michelle.april@ps.ge.com on 09/25/2000 11:36:54 AM

To:   mitch.robinson@enron.com
cc:

Subject:  FW: Returned mail: Host unknown (Name server: enron: host not fou
      nd)

Mitch,

Mike Murphy tried to email this to you but was unsucessful.  I also spoke
with Ross Newlin concerning the testing.  We need to speak with you to
confirm one way or another.

Michelle

From: michaelj.murphy@ps.ge.com
To: mitch.robinson@enron
Subject: Enron Lincoln Center
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 11:06:50 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2651.58)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;     boundary="
----_=_NextPart_002_01C0270E.D09FC190"

Mitch,

Attached is the handout presentation that was given today to the Enron
team.
I have also attached the proposed schedule for the work at the Lincoln
Center site. The plan is work two (2) shifts per day, ten (10) per day. It
is expected to take six (6) days per unit at this time. GE will work to
minimize the schedule and we hope with productivity and best practices to
improve the schedule. After the hardware changes made, retesting of the
units will need to occur. GE will bring and emissions test vendor to the
<<Wilton Customerhandout.ppt>>  <<Emissions schedule.xls>>  site and check
the NOx and CO readings. It is expected that the units will need to run at
Base Load for Approximately 8-10 hours and then at the reduced loads to
check part readings. The total operating time should be about 12 twelve
hours.

If you have any questions, please contact Michelle April or myself.

Mike Murphy
Installation Director
513-682-5514

(See attached file: Wilton Customerhandout.ppt)
(See attached file: Emissions schedule.xls)

---------------------- Forwarded by Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron on 09/29/2000
03:36 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Mitch Robinson                           09/25/2000 01:31 PM

To: michelle.april@ps.ge.com
cc: Ross Newlin/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Merle
Churchill/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Lincoln Center Improvements

Michelle -

Please forward to Mike Murphy.  In general, the schedule is acceptable.
Please work with Merle on the details.  Can you or Mike confirm my
understanding of the following?

1.  Though the units ran within limits on NOx and CO throughout the summer,
GE believes that the performance will be enhanced with the attached
modifications (i.e. NOx will be reduced even further to the 7.5-8.5 ppm
range).

2.  The liners will have their dilution holes resized.  Will the secondary
nozzles also be modified, or is this not required?

3.  You can postpone the retest until the next expected run season
(December/January).

4.  This change will not limit the ability to run prior to the scheduled
test, in the event of an unexpected run call.

5.  Enron or Des Plaines Green Land Development (Lincoln Center) will not
incur any financial obligations as a result of the change-out.

Thanks for your diligence, and please let the GE team know that I appreciate
the effort given to the Lincoln plant.  Regarding both the generator
change-out and the emissions effort, I have no complaints with GE's
performance.

Regards,

Mitch

michelle.april@ps.ge.com on 09/25/2000 11:36:54 AM
To: mitch.robinson@enron.com
cc:

Subject: FW: Returned mail: Host unknown (Name server: enron: host not fou nd)

Mitch,

Mike Murphy tried to email this to you but was unsucessful.  I also spoke
with Ross Newlin concerning the testing.  We need to speak with you to
confirm one way or another.

Michelle

From: michaelj.murphy@ps.ge.com
To: mitch.robinson@enron
Subject: Enron Lincoln Center
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 11:06:50 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2651.58)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_002_01C0270E.D09FC190"

Mitch,

Attached is the handout presentation that was given today to the Enron team.
I have also attached the proposed schedule for the work at the Lincoln
Center site. The plan is work two (2) shifts per day, ten (10) per day. It
is expected to take six (6) days per unit at this time. GE will work to
minimize the schedule and we hope with productivity and best practices to
improve the schedule. After the hardware changes made, retesting of the
units will need to occur. GE will bring and emissions test vendor to the
<<Wilton Customerhandout.ppt>>  <<Emissions schedule.xls>>  site and check
the NOx and CO readings. It is expected that the units will need to run at
Base Load for Approximately 8-10 hours and then at the reduced loads to
check part readings. The total operating time should be about 12 twelve
hours.

If you have any questions, please contact Michelle April or myself.

Mike Murphy
Installation Director
513-682-5514

 - Wilton Customerhandout.ppt
 - Emissions schedule.xls


Lin:
Please call Leslie Hansen with respect to power issues.  Her number is
713-853-6121.
Carol

	"Reece, Lin" <Lin.Reece@SouthernEnergy.Com>
	06/15/2000 02:45 PM

		 To: "'Carol.St.Clair@enron.com'" <Carol.St.Clair@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: CONFIRMATION COVERSHEET PROCESS LTR.DOC

I just faxed the agreement back to you.  Thanks for your help with this.  I
need a contact for Enron Power Marketing to do the same for the master power
agreement.

-----Original Message-----
From: Carol.St.Clair@enron.com [mailto:Carol.St.Clair@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2000 5:26 PM
To: Lin.Reece@SouthernEnergy.Com
Subject: RE: CONFIRMATION COVERSHEET PROCESS LTR.DOC

Lin:
Yes, that's right the Confirmation Reply per your earloier request remains
as is.  My fax number is 713-646-3393.
Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)

                    "Reece, Lin"

                    <Lin.Reece@SouthernE        To:
"'Carol.St.Clair@enron.com'" <Carol.St.Clair@enron.com>
                    nergy.Com>                  cc:     "McGough, Scott"
<Scott.McGough@SouthernEnergy.Com>
                                                Subject:     RE:
CONFIRMATION COVERSHEET PROCESS LTR.DOC
                    06/14/2000 04:12 PM

Thanks so much.  I'm sending your revisions to Scott for review.  The
Confirmation Reply has been totally red lined out of these attachments, but
I am assuming that it remains as we originally designed it.  Please advise
if this is not correct.  If your changes are accepted, I will print a copy
and have Scott McGough execute it.  Please give me your fax number so that
I
can fax it to you.  Regards, Lin Reece

-----Original Message-----
From: Carol.St.Clair@enron.com [mailto:Carol.St.Clair@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2000 4:13 PM
To: Lin.Reece@SouthernEnergy.Com
Cc: Larry.Joe.Hunter@enron.com
Subject: RE: CONFIRMATION COVERSHEET PROCESS LTR.DOC

Lin:
Enclosed is a revised letter.

(See attached file: Southern Confirm Letter 2 RED.DOC)(See attached file:
Southern Confirm Letter 2.DOC)

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)

                    "Reece, Lin"

                    <Lin.Reece@SouthernE        To:
"'Carol.St.Clair@enron.com'" <Carol.St.Clair@enron.com>
                    nergy.Com>                  cc:     "McGough, Scott"
<Scott.McGough@SouthernEnergy.Com>,

"'larry.joe.hunter@enron.com'" <larry.joe.hunter@enron.com>
                    06/14/2000 11:21 AM         Subject:     RE:
CONFIRMATION COVERSHEET PROCESS LTR.DOC

Dear Carol,    We do not want to create an agreement specfic coversheet for
each counterparty.  Is there some way to put language in the body of the
letter agreement to address your concerns.  The procedure we are proposing
is intended to supplement current requirements in the ISDA, not replace
them.  If you feel that additional definition needs to be added to the
confirmation process, shouldn't we put that definition in the letter
agreement rather than on the cover sheet?

Our goal is to be able to expedite our response to counterparty confirms.
In order to do this we need to have the same cover sheet in place for each
counterparty.  Please call me at 678-579-3378 so that we may discuss
possible solutions.  Thanks, Lin

-----Original Message-----
From: Carol.St.Clair@enron.com [mailto:Carol.St.Clair@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2000 11:12 AM
To: Lin.Reece@SouthernEnergy.Com
Cc: Larry.Joe.Hunter@enron.com
Subject: Re: CONFIRMATION COVERSHEET PROCESS LTR.DOC

Lin:
Enclosed are clean and marked  versions of my redo of the reply letter.

(See attached file: Southern Confirm Letter 2 RED.DOC)(See attached file:
Southern Confirm Letter 2.DOC)
Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)

                    "Reece, Lin"

                    <Lin.Reece@SouthernE        To:
"'carol.st.clair@enron.com'" <carol.st.clair@enron.com>
                    nergy.Com>                  cc:

                                                Subject:     CONFIRMATION
COVERSHEET PROCESS LTR.DOC
                    06/13/2000 02:25 PM

 <<CONFIRMATION COVERSHEET PROCESS LTR.DOC>>

Carol,  Please feel free to change the letter agreement.  The coversheet
needs to remain as it is, because we are using this same sheet for all
counterparties.  Thanks, Lin

(See attached file: CONFIRMATION COVERSHEET PROCESS LTR.DOC)


I regret to inform you that Ken Rice and Kevin Hannon have decided to leave Enron to pursue other opportunities.  Most recently, Ken had been assisting in the transition of Enron Broadband Services to Wholesale Services.  Kevin recently left Broadband Services to lead our Global Assets business.

In addition to building a wholesale model for the trading of bandwidth as a commodity, Ken and Kevin made significant contributions to the development of our wholesale business.  I am grateful to both of them for their outstanding service to Enron.

I am pleased to announce that effective immediately Stan Horton, chairman and CEO of Enron Transportation Services, will assume additional leadership responsibility as chairman and CEO of Enron Global Assets, excluding the South American merchant business, which will continue to report to John Lavorato.  Stan is a 28-year veteran of the company with a proven track record of outstanding results.  Enron Global Assets will continue to function as a separate unit headed by President and Chief Operating Officer Jim Hughes, who will report to Stan.

Please join me in supporting Stan in his expanded role and in wishing Ken and Kevin the very best of success in their new endeavors.


BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS

Enron Global Markets
In a combined effort, Global Risk Markets (GRM), a unit of Enron Global Markets, and Southeast Power Origination, part of Enron Americas, closed Enron's first Contingent Call Outage Option in the 1st quarter 2001. The product was created to provide customers with a cost effective risk management tool to hedge against high commodity prices after experiencing an unplanned power generation outage.

The transaction was entered into with UtiliCorp United to manage its generation risk for summer 2001. This risk is associated with a forced outage of their largest coal unit during peak summer demand. The transaction, which was developed jointly with the Southeast Power group, highlights the benefits of cooperation between business units within Enron. GRM is working with a number of business units to integrate this risk management product into other Enron businesses to enhance value to our customers.  For additional information on the product, please call David Hoog in the New York office at 212 702 3920.

IN THE NEWS

WORTH Magazine Names the Top 50 CEO's
NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--April 23, 2001--Fifty of the country's chief executive officers have been chosen by WORTH magazine as the top business leaders in the nation, it was announced by W. Randall Jones, CEO, Worth Media.
The third annual listing of CEO's by WORTH is determined based on each leaders "foresight, judgment, and competitive juice to make their investors happy." Rounding out the top 5 are the following best leaders:
1. Steve Ballmer, CEO, Microsoft   2. Jeffrey Skilling, CEO, Enron   3. Philip Purcell, CEO, Morgan Stanley   4. James Morgan, CEO, Applied Materials
5. Margaret Whitman, CEO, eBay
"We selected this year's list based on our belief in the CEO's ability to deliver long-term shareholder value," said Jones. "The real test is not to recognize past achievements but to be able to look back in five or ten years from now. As a matter of fact, some CEO's we've chosen haven't made money for share holders in the past few years, but we believe they are poised to do so now."  WORTH's methodology for selecting the 50 best CEO's strives to balance their possession of a vision with a demonstrated ability to execute under stress and when confronted by urgent challenges.

WELCOME
New Hires
EGM  - Chrishelle Berell, Paul Murray, Yong Yi
EIM   - Jeff Nutt
ENA  - Keegan Farrell

Transfers (to or within)
ENA - Joe Parks, Mike Purcell
EGM - Samuel Enochian

NUGGETS & NOTES

Travel Tip of the Week:  Book non-refundable tickets. Airlines typically allow unused non-refundable tickets to be applied towards subsequent travel. Even if you need to make a change at a rate of $100, in many cases the change fee plus the ticket price is still less than a refundable ticket.
	For example:  Houston to Washington, D.C.
	     Refundable:		$ 1,447
	     Non-refundable      	$    540

LEGAL STUFF
The information contained in this newsletter is confidential and proprietary to Enron Corp. and its subsidiaries.  It is intended for internal use only and should not be disclosed.