No surprises with CW.  She's very nice to me, but she does like to keep very
specific hours.  I get the impression that leaving 15 minutes past 5 really
bothers her.  Just watch, and see.

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 09/18/2000 02:34 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: Tomorrow's GE Phone Call/Today's Meeting To Prepare

She told you she'd be there, but she didn't know where to go.  I get a bit of
attitude here  Didn't you say she was no nonsense.  Oh, and get this, Mary
Cook has asked if Chaundra has made up the list for assistants willing to
work overtime for her yet.  Apparently, Chaundra won't do the OT.  I only do
OT for my people, and I can't believe she doesn't have a better work ethic.
Meow!!!!
----- Forwarded by Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT on 09/18/2000 02:32 PM -----

	Lisa Bills@ENRON
	09/18/2000 02:31 PM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Tomorrow's GE Phone Call/Today's Meeting To Prepare

As I told Kay, I will be there.

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 09/18/2000 01:44 PM
To: Martin W Penkwitz/NA/Enron@Enron, Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Lisa Bills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott
Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Brian D
Barto/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Tomorrow's GE Phone Call/Today's Meeting To Prepare

I have booked EB38C1 for 4:00 p.m. to discuss the above-referenced subject.
Please let me know ASAP if you will/will not be able to attend.  Thanks,
Suzanne, x37340


Also, there are bankruptcy issues associated with transferring something from Enron to Netco and the license may not be transferable.  Charles is going to check further as to exactly what would be transferred and what (software?) costs are associated with this.  Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Yeung, Charles
Sent:	Tuesday, January 08, 2002 4:00 PM
To:	Gilbert-smith, Doug
Cc:	Day, Smith L.; Nicolay, Christi L.
Subject:	RE: ERCOT Registration Requirements

A question, am I correct that the LSE status being referred to is NOT EPMI - if so, is it with EES?  or what entity?
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gilbert-smith, Doug
Sent:	Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:32 AM
To:	Yeung, Charles
Cc:	Day, Smith L.
Subject:	RE: ERCOT Registration Requirements

Charles,

I think that we are better off just conveying the clean LSE over to NETCO and then registering as an REP in the event we need to. The QSE needs to be re done as the last one is messy.

Thanks,

Doug

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Yeung, Charles
Sent:	Monday, January 07, 2002 4:29 PM
To:	Nicolay, Christi L.
Cc:	Day, Smith L.; Gilbert-smith, Doug; Steffes, James D.
Subject:	ERCOT Registration Requirements

I am researching with ERCOT staff, the timing requirements for QSE, LSE and TCR registration.  They are not on the website.

 << File: ERCOTRequirements.doc >>


Tony, I thought there would be a case that stated that if an interstate
pipeline posts the criteria under which it will evaluate capacity bids, it
must stick to those criteria and not award the capacity to a bidder on some
other basis.  It seems a simple enough extension of the principle that
capacity must be awarded on a nondiscriminatory basis.  However, I did not
find any case that stands for that exact proposition.  As you may be aware,
the Commission made Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America (NGPL) come up
with a way to ensure that it awarded capacity one a nondiscriminatory
basis...because NGPL was found to have been giving preferential treatment to
its shippers.  NGPL's solution was to come up with an auction process, and
there is a whole line of cases if you're interested.  The underlying
presumption is that if you set up a system under which all capacity is
awarded and stick with that system, there is no way you could be acting
discriminatorily.  But of course the Commission never comes out and says this
even though it should be obvious.

Probably the best we can do is extrapolate from 1) the tariff and 2) the NGA
(doesn't it also say we have to provide service on a not unduly discrim.
basis?).  Also, in your memo I'd give an example; i.e., if we notify shippers
of our auction process and set a deadline for bidding, but then award the
capacity to Sempra (assuming Sempra requested capacity after the posting), we
will have unduly discriminated against all the other shippers who had to
participate in the auction process.

Maybe in future postings on Enrononline we should include a statement to the
effect that the capacity posted will not be awarded except thru the
Enrononline process.

Now for some trivia.  Remember we were discussing with Shelley whether we
could post a different method (other than that prescribed in the tariff) for
determining best bid?  In my Westlaw search I ran across the relevant case.
In Northwest Pipeline, 85 FERC P 61,335, the Commission stated:  "The
Commission has previously given pipelines the leeway, in open season
provisions, to either include in their tariff a single non-discriminatory bid
evaluation methodology, or provide themselves the flexibility of choosing
different non-discriminatory bid evaulation methods for different
transactions, provided that the pipeline posts the bid evaluation methodology
before the bidding process begins."  The only problem is I am not sure we
have that "flexibility" since the tariff does not expressly allow us to post
a different method.  Maybe next time we do a tariff cleanup we could add some
language allowing us to do so.

I have to move on to my next project but if you want me to comment on what
you write I'd be happy to.


Expand your business! Make it easy for your customers to
pay using Visa, Master Card, Discover, American Express,
Debit Card and Checks via Phone/Fax/Internet. How? Through
a business Merchant Account!

By providing multiple methods of acceptable payment you
automatically help ensure that it will be easier for them
to pay you and build up trust. People DON'T want to send
cash or checks via mail, because it is dangerous and gives
them absolutely no guarantees whatsoever.

So make it easier for your customers and setup a Merchant
Account for your business. There are NO setup fees, and
the monthly costs are very low. To obtain more information,
please reply to this email with your name, phone number
with area code, and a good time to call. You will be
contacted within 10 business days by one of our staff.
Thank you for your time.

To be removed from our contact list, send us an email
with the subject "Remove"  and you will be automatically
taken off our list. If removal does not work, reply with
your email address in the Body of the email

kzy4


Tracy:

See Julie's note below.   We'll want to go ahead and proceed with the Quarter Forecast Meeting even if Danny's not available, right?

Cindy

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Armstrong, Julie
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 2:45 PM
To:	Stark, Cindy
Subject:	November 13th Quarter Forecast meeting

Cindy:
Please note that Danny will returning on November 13th from a business trip (out 11th-13th) and not able to make the 1:30 Quarter Forecast Meeting with Stan.  Note the Management Conference is November 14-16 and the following week is Thanksgiving.

Please advise if you want to reset the meeting. Thanks.


Dear Steve,

Attached is our update on the Business Council Invitations.

Linda


[IMAGE]
 	 	    Dear Andrew,  There's a probability of a shift in power in Washington as rumors surround Senator Jim Jeffords (R-VT).  Washington officials are saying Sen. Jeffords is planning to abandon the Republican Party, although no one is certain whether he'll become a Democrat or an Independent.  Either way, the move would give Democrats the Senate majority, which could have a major impact on the Bush administration's ability to implement its national energy policy.  Sen. Jeffords has scheduled a press conference from Vermont on Thursday morning, and ENL's Washington bureau will bring you details on his announcement.   Washington Bureau Chief Jay Cranford reports the House Energy and Commerce Committee is scheduled to mark up the Electricity Emergency Relief Act on Thursday.  Jay expects Democrats to once again attempt to include price caps on wholesale power in the markup.       Jay also reports, next week President Bush is scheduled to travel to California to assess the energy situation.  While there, Bush is expected to meet with Governor Gray Davis to discuss energy policy.  ENL's Washington bureau will be following developments surrounding the President's trip next week.   Also from our DC bureau, I'm scheduled to speak with former Chairman of the Senate Energy and Environmental Resources Committee Bennett Johnston.  He's scheduled to join us in the 1:00 p.m. ET newscast.   On tap from the Houston bureau on Thursday:  Correspondent Kim Benestante reports the Texas House of Representatives has approved subsidies toward a bill that would drastically cut diesel emissions in the state.  The Houston bureau will also bring us a report on an upcoming meeting between Enron and India officials about payment for power.  We'll have all the details from these stories and more from the Houston bureau on Thursday.       Also from the Houston bureau, Bureau Chief of the Energy Intelligence Group Barbara Shook is scheduled to join us on Thursday.  She'll discuss a state-of-the-art Shell Gas to Liquids terminal in Malaysia that turns gas into emissions-free diesel fuel.  Catch these and other stories from Houston on Thursday.   Keep in mind things are subject to change at a moment's notice.  Occasionally guests cancel or change time slots.  We'll continue to do our best to keep you updated on future interviews and events.     Keep it on energynewslive.com  for all your energy news.
 			[IMAGE]
	 	Jay Rickerts, EnergyNewsLive.com Anchor  View today's Energy Wrap  video: (Windows Media Player required) Broadband  (100k)   |  Dial-up  (56k)  Get  Windows Media Player   Experience all that Williams Energy  News Live has to offer!   If you are receiving this letter for the first time and wish to continue,  subscribe now    To stop receiving this letter,   unsubscribe now     If you are having trouble receiving this e-mail, please let us know  or  call (800) WILLIAMS (800-945-5426) weekdays, 7am-7pm CST.    Comments? Suggestions? Let us  know  or  call (800) WILLIAMS (800-945-5426) weekdays, 7am-7pm CST.    Copyright 2001 Williams Energy News Live, LLC. All  Rights Reserved.


FYI--

Kinder Morgan will be injecting 30.0/day into Bammel storage during April.

Thanks,
Mark
x33396


I received a call this morning from Jaroslav "Jarda" Solc (701-777-5217).
Jarda is a Senior Research Manager for the Groundwater Resource & Remediation
Group at the Energy & Environmental Research Center (EERC). Jarda reports to
Edward "Ed" Steadman, Associate Director for Research at the EERC. Norm
Moreno with the POEP had contacted Ed, provided him with my name and number,
and asked if Ed's organization would contact us in regard to the EERC
providing some assistance to TW with remediation of PCB contamination at the
Laguna site.

I provided a brief description of site conditions and we then discussed
alternative remediation methods. Based on the information I provided, Jarda
agreed that continued monitoring seemed to be appropriate. Jarda also
indicated that his group did not have any off-the-shelf type remediation
technologies that would be applicable. I suggested to Jarda that his
organization might still be of service to TW in our discussions with the
Pueblo and the POEP as a third party opinion. Jarda said that he would
discuss this with Ed and get back to me.


Energy Boost Electricity generators note Bush's focus on more supply
Source: Fort Worth Star - Telegram
Publication date: 2001-05-19
Arrival time: 2001-05-21

Electricity generators around the country didn't need to read the Bush
administration's energy plan to know there's already a strong market for
their product.
"It's a bit of frenzy, I would say," Lane Kadel said of demand for the
natural gas-fired turbines brokered by his company, Utility Warehouse.com of
Portland, Ore. The 5-year-old enterprise, originally started to help electric
utilities buy and sell surplus equipment, has seen demand for
electricity-generating machinery move into high- voltage territory in recent
months.
With electricity already in short supply in parts of the country, headlines
of rolling blackouts in California, and growth projected to require more
power, U.S. electricity generators have announced plans for 312,836 megawatts
of new capacity. That's equal to about 40 percent of the nation's existing
generating capacity.
So it was no surprise to anybody in the industry that electricity figured
prominently Thursday in President Bush's energy plan. The plan largely
emphasizes the need to add more energy supplies, projecting that the nation
will need to add 393,000 megawatts of capacity by 2020. In 1999, the nation
added 10,266 megawatts of new capacity, according to the Energy Department.
Bush's plan also aims to speed up additions to generating capacity by easing
licensing, permitting and other regulatory review, including rules to
encourage more nuclear power plants.
The Bush plan, industry people say, apparently contains nothing to discourage
the industry's push to add supply.
"If there is, we haven't seen it," said Mark Stultz, vice president of the
Electric Power Supply Association, a group of independent power producers.
The plans for new capacity that have already been announced represent more
than $150 billion in potential investment in new electricity supply.
Not all the planned capacity will be built, at least not right away, said Tom
Rose, vice president of public affairs at TXU in Dallas. But a lot will, and
the projects that are postponed will probably still go through permitting and
land acquisition, "things that don't cost a lot of money," Rose said.
With that groundwork done, new capacity could come on line all the faster
when the market justifies it, he said.
The emphasis on adding supply doesn't please everyone in the electricity
business.
Jerry Davia, president of Orion Energy in Sausalito, Calif., would rather see
the government encourage investment in energy efficiency. Davia's company
consults with companies, including San Antonio-based H.E. Butt Grocery Co.,
to design and finance energy-saving systems.
"There's tons of new, energy-efficient technology out there all the time," he
said. "There's enough conservation to tackle any problems we have."
Energy users are probably in the best position to decide which energy
efficiencies make sense financially, but the government could make the
economics more attractive with tax credits and other incentives, he said.
"I don't see anything that bodes well" in the Bush plan as far as subsidies
and credits, he said. "And there's nothing just for California."
That's fine with Karl Rabago, managing director of the Rocky Mountain
Institute, a not-for-profit organization that advocates efficient use of
resources, including energy.
Rabago said he doesn't want energy use subsidized, because that
short-circuits the market mechanism that forces users to reduce consumption
in response to higher prices. At the same time, he also doesn't like aspects
of the Bush plan that he believes subsidize energy production.
Jesper Michaelsen, sales manager for wind turbine manufacturer NEG Micon USA
of Rolling Hills, Ill., said he was disappointed that Bush's plan doesn't set
any specific goals for increasing the amount of power generated from
renewable sources. Wind and solar sources account for just 2 percent of the
nation's total electricity market.
But Allen Barnett, who heads solar panel maker AstroPower of Newark, Del.,
said he's thankful for any attention at all, given the oil-and-gas
backgrounds of many Bush advisers. The Bush plan does include tax credits for
people who purchase solar panels.
"It's the most we could hope for," Barnett said. "I didn't expect them to
abandon their roots."
The Bush electricity measures that don't deal with adding generating capacity
address ways to build a bigger transmission system to carry power from
generators to users.
Two major recommendations include the creation of a national electricity grid
and giving federal regulators power to condemn private property for
infrastructure improvements such as new electrical transmission lines and
natural gas pipelines to deliver fuel to new generators.
Today, the United States has three regional electricity transmission grids:
Western, Eastern and Texas, which is mostly on its own grid and - unlike
energy-strapped states such as California - has a surplus of electricity.
Texas is virtually unconnected to the two regional grids, and the two
regional grids likewise aren't efficiently linked.
"It's going to lead to a lot of new investment," utility analyst Barry
Abramson, of the UBS Warburg investment firm, said of Bush's proposals.
"Right now, the country is full of transmission bottlenecks that make the
system less efficient and hinder competition and the delivery of power."
The 1995 Texas Legislature commissioned a study into tying Texas into the
national grids and concluded that it would cost $500 million to $600 million,
TXU's Rose said.
"It is not easy," he said. "It all has to be done at the same time," because
the amount of electricity moving between grids would quickly overload one or
two connecting lines.
Rose also said many states, including Texas, already allow governments to
condemn private property, a process called eminent domain. Public
transportation projects provide the most common use of eminent domain, along
with the construction of pipelines.
Kadel said boosting the nation's electricity infrastructure might be just as
important as adding generating capacity. "Right now you don't have any way to
move the electricity, so prices are high," he said.
This report includes material from The Associated Press.


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Monthly Accounting Meeting conference room EB4194/Larry

Date:		9/22/2000
Time:		1:30 PM - 3:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Hi Carol -
Sorry for the delay.  The "credit person" at Inland is probably Julie Beck,
although she can naturally be overruled by the Temple-Inland Treasurer, Dave
Turpin, or CFO Randy Levy, since Temple-Inland will be obtaining the letter
of credit and will serve as guarantor.  Since they are at least one step
removed from the process, if you could tell me what questions/comments from
my 5/16 memo they will need to address, and ideally your
responses/commentary in some summary format, I can upstream this information
to them, obtain their feedback, and speak on their behalf.
Thanx,
Jack Falconi

-----Original Message-----
From: Carol.St.Clair@enron.com [mailto:Carol.St.Clair@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 3:57 PM
To: Jack.Falconi@guarantygroup.com
Subject: Meeting

Jack:
My assistant will be calling you to set up a time next week when Ken Curry
and I can discuss your comments with you and your credit person.  Her name
is Suzanne Adams.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


FYI!

---------------------- Forwarded by Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT on 12/04/2000
07:59 AM ---------------------------

Barbara Ostdiek <ostdiek@rice.edu> on 12/01/2000 05:38:08 PM
To: ostdiek@rice.edu
cc:
Subject: RICE/ERON FINANCE SEMINAR SERIES

Enron Seminar Series in Finance
Jones Graduate School of Management, Rice University

Tim Bollerslev
Duke University

will give a seminar at the Jones School on Friday, December 8,?

&Measuring, Modeling, and Forecasting Realized Volatility.8

The seminar will begin at 10:30 in Room 113.

Please note the different time and different room for this seminar.

A pdf of the paper is available through the seminar website
http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~jgsfss/.
?


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 11/07/2000 01:25 PM -----

	Jane Wilson@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	11/06/2000 02:38 AM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: More

Sorry to bring more to you but perhaps this is something that Rob Walls could
easily look through.  Global has a contract that is ready for signing.
Global is involved as an investor in Razorfinish.com.  The person who is
supposed to sign the contract is procrastinating as long as possible bec ause
the contract is not in the interest of Enron.  I told the person not to sign
it regardless of the pressure from Sanjay.  Hopefully, Rob could get to it.


Patrick,

The attached file contains the base and spot purchases by zone on HPL  for
September 2000.  Let me know if you have any questions.

D


Deborah:
I am out this Monday but will check voice mail.  Your people can also call
Harlan Murphy next week as he and I are both covering for Jeff.
Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

	Deborah Culver@EES
	06/07/2001 06:21 PM

		 To: EESO Legal
		 cc: Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie
Hiltabrand/HOU/EES@EES, Cathy Deleonardis/HOU/EES@EES
		 Subject: Coordination with EWS

Jeff Hodge will be out of the office beginning at noon tomorrow through next
week.  If you have any issues that need to be discussed with him this week,
please let me know, and I will coordinate an EES/EWS meeting with Jeff
tomorrow morning.  While Jeff is out of town, he asks that we continue to
copy him, but all question/issues should be directed to Carol St. Clair.  Jim
Keller will be back next week and will be setting up meeting times with Carol
as we have with Jeff.


i think she is one of jen's cougar friends.  that is such a chick thing to
do.


Hi.

This is one of my top priorities.  I think it looks fine.  What do you think?

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 02/12/2001 12:45
PM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
01/30/2001 12:04 PM
To: Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: enovate appointments

Let's discuss.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/30/2001 12:04
PM ---------------------------
From: Gregg Penman on 01/26/2001 01:16 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: enovate appointments

Kay - have you had any chance to give this some thought?  We are about to
take some actions that require Board approval so I would like to get this
finalized. Let me know.  Also, I am trying to get back on the Intercompany
loan stuff.  I am going to be in Houston next week and have Wednesday pretty
open.  Are you going to be in town?  If so, maybe we could get together for
half hour or so to go over the loan stuff.

Thanks - Gregg
----- Forwarded by Gregg Penman/Corp/Enron on 01/26/2001 01:14 PM -----

	Gregg Penman
	01/17/2001 08:41 AM

		 To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: enovate appointments

It looks like your memory serves you well.  Section 6.8.2 allows the Managing
Member to designate officers of enovate.  I revised the original appointment
declaration you prepared to reflect Laura as VP.  Take a look at it and let
me know if it works.  If so, I will probably ask you to have Janet execute it
at your convenience.

Thanks - Gregg


Do you know what this is about?   Mark
----- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 10/16/2000 11:17 AM -----

	George McClellan
	04/11/2000 02:45 PM

		 To: Stuart Staley/LON/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Force Majeur Claim - Fiddlers Ferry Unit 2

Rogue cargo?  What the hell!

Stuart Staley
04/11/2000 09:43 AM
To: Robert Quick/LON/ECT@ECT, George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Force Majeur Claim - Fiddlers Ferry Unit 2

Robert - is this legit?

George - the beat goes on

---------------------- Forwarded by Stuart Staley/LON/ECT on 11/04/2000 15:38
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  MCrosland@edisonmission.com                           11/04/2000 14:53

To: Stuart.Staley@enron.com
cc: Peter.Bradley@enron.com, "LondonFuels" <LondonFuels@edisonmission.com>

Subject: Force Majeur Claim - Fiddlers Ferry Unit 2

Stu,
I am sure you will be aware from your market intelligence of the problems at
FF
Unit 2, which we are advised is an event of Force Majeur. I believe it would
be
counter-productive to the spirit of current negotiations to prosecute an FM
claim and do not therefore propose to do so at this time. However, in the
event
of an unsatisfactory outcome to these negotiations we do reserve the right to
ultimately pursue a Force Majeur claim in respect of the failure of FF Unit 2.
I am also holding back FF's claim for mill damage from the rogue cargo of hard
La Loma coal on the same principle.
Please respond if you disagree with this approach.
Regards
Max


The attached files contains our daily volume requirements for  08/30 and  the
following day(s) as listed .    In each file there are three  worksheets
labelled as follows:

'Total Reqs':  Contains the volumes that CES is requesting from Enron at each
of the delivery points and dates indicated in the columns labelled "NOM".
The
Enron schedulers will want to check this sheet to see how much gas is needed
at
a specific point.   The AGL volumes are not timely and should be ignored until
further notice.    CES schedulers note:  the attached file is archived on
P:\Energy Ops\Enron\Aug_00\Daily\ *.xls, so you don't have to save a duplicate
copy elsewhere on the network.
'Daily Change' :  shows the change (increase +/decrease -) in the daily volume
needed from Enron at the designated citygate delivery point relative to the
supply volumes arranged previously with Enron prior to the current date.  For
the current gas day, the change is an intra-day change and is calculated using
the previous day's volume request for the current day (e.g., If the current
gas
day is 3/28, then the change is computed with respect to the 3/27 request for
3/28.  Note that this procedure assumes that the prior day supply change was
in
fact effectuated).  For tomorrow's gas day and any subsequent ones shown, the
change is computed as the latest Dth Nomination requirement less the
First-of-the-month supply volume plus or minus any adjustments made since the
first-of-the-month to the FOM supply for the (future) days shown.  (e.g., If
today is 3/28, then the change for 3/29, 3/30, etc. is computed with respect
to
the first-of-the-month volumes for those days adjusted for any additional
purchases or sell-backs since the first-of-the-month thru 3/27.)   This sheet
should be useful in determining prices for daily changes in gas volumes that
we
take or turn back.   The column labelled "ENA Daily Swing +/- vs FOM volume'
shows the absolute magnitude of the daily swings allowed by ENA at
pre-specified prices.  Prices for Swing volumes exceeding these magnitudes or
for swings at delivery points without pre-specified pricing must be
negotiated.
'Comments':

Doug Kinney
Ph:  703-561-6339
Fax:  703-561-7317

 - 08-30-00 daily vols.xls


Dear Real-Timers,

Just wanted to let you know that I have had 4 or 5 dispute requests which are
actually a counterparty change.  They have been entered in EnPower as sales
or purchases to/from TransCanada Power Corp. when the counterparty is
actually TransCanada Power, a division of TransCanada Energy Ltd   (who
really knows the difference?)  Anyway, just wanted to bring this to your
attention so that the next time they call, you know how to record it in
EnPower.  (Or at least you'll know to ask which TransCanada they are.)

VA


I am submitting Alice Johnson for the Chairman's Award and would like your input.  I think the leadership she has shown in support of the UNCF Walkathon demonstrates those core values that are the measurements for the award.   Attached is the Chairman's Award form.  Please complete as much of the form as you can in support of Alice, and return it to me by the end of this week.  Leonard Daily and myself (and any one else who wants to participate) will compile the responses into one form and submit it.

Thanks for your support.

Calvin Eakins
Director, Business and Diversity Development
Enron Corp
ph. 713-646-9500
www.enron.com/mwbd
calvin.eakins@enron.com


Tracy,

We trying to find a time on Hughes schedule.  I will pin him down today on a time.

Sommers

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Geaccone, Tracy
Sent:	Saturday, October 06, 2001 2:53 PM
To:	Sommers, Jeffrey E.
Cc:	Hayslett, Rod
Subject:	EGAS 2002 Capital Budget Review

Stan said last week that he would like to do a EGAS 2002 Capital Budget Review.  When do you think we can do this?


pcappers@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:

The NYISO is reserving hours beginning 1600 and 2200 in the 28 November 2000
Real-Time market as well as the following hours per ECA20001006B to verify
prices:
PJM: 700, 1100, 2300
HQ: 600 - 700, 1600 - 1900, 2300
NE: 700, 2300
OH: 700, 2300.
Prices in the 29 November 2000 Day-Ahead market are correct.


Good morning!  I thank you for the morning prayer. I really needed to see and
hear that today. GOD BLESS YOU!   Love, Judy.

---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 08/18/2000
08:23 AM ---------------------------

Regina Blackshear@ENRON
08/17/2000 06:46 PM
To: vblack4538@aol.com, l_carter61@hotmail.com,
sonia_l_castorena@reliantenergy.com, Yolanda Clay<yoclay@flash.net>,
Amber.Ebow@enron.com, Loneta Edison<Loneta.Edison@wcom.com>,
NAGILL443@aol.com, Tammy Green <tcgreen@flash.net>, GRHRDH@aol.com,
locacherri@aol.com, "R Jordan"<rhondamjordan@hotmail.com>, "BENEDICT
PETERS"<bouncing98@hotmail.com>, rosemary.a.reynolds@usa.xerox.com, Judy
Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angela Barnett/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: Prayer for the Morning

-

 - PRAYERF1.DOC


Thanks for the info. Next year we want to run those fees through legal before
they are allocated out.    Mark


Thanks, but no headhunters.   I can't afford a fee.  Michelle

-----Original Message-----
From: Magee, Molly
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 6:33 PM
To: Cash, Michelle
Subject: Candidate Resume

Please review the following resume  for the position of SPEC SR LEGAL.

HUGHES,HOLLY  ->		00598689.DOC


I don't have any problems with the change to the Letter Agreements

-----Original Message-----
From: George Kutzschbach [mailto:gkutzschbach@fulbright.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 4:54 PM
To: Ben.F.Jacoby@enron.com; Kay.Mann@enron.com; Campbell, Carolyn;
Keffer, John
Cc: DPedigo@INTERGEN.com
Subject: Sweetgum/ENA

I have not yet received all of InterGen's comments on the documents,
however, to expedite matters, I am passing on some additional comments
on the letter agreements and the form of Facility Agreement to be
attached to the letter agreements.

Letter Agreements:  Sections 3(a) and 3.(b) of all three letter
agreements should be revised as noted in the attached form of letter
agreement.

Facility Agreements:

1.  The second sentence of Section 17.4.1 of each of the Facility
Agreements should be amended to read as follows:

"If the Maximum Liability Amount (less any unpaid portion of the
Purchase Amount) is greater than the Proper Scope Value the difference
between such amount and the Proper Scope Value (the "Refund Amount")
shall be settled between the parties in accordance with Section 17.4.4
below."

This is the same comment I made earlier.

2.  Exhibits B-1 and H-2 are blank and the corresponding exhibits from
the master GE sales agreement should be attached to the Facility
Agreement.

3.  The cross-reference to Exhibit N-1 should be deleted from Exhibit I
as Exhibit N-1 was deleted from the Facility Agreement.

4.  Exhibit R is blank, however, it is unclear whether this Exhibit is
still relevant.

5.  Exhibit U appears to be incomplete and the reference back to
Section 10.8.4 is unclear.  I believe Tom Seigler brought this up point
up with Ben before Coral left the proposed transaction.

6.  The references throughout the Exhibits to "oF" should be corrected
to contain the degree symbol.

Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - 5wtmq03_.DOC


Hi Mike, as per our discussion I have managed to find a place for Michael in
EBS' D.C. office.  It is likely that he will work for me on the EBS side but
will live in D.C.  I will finalize that later.   Vince had mentioned that it
is okay with him as long as it is okay with you. So please double check with
Vince on this.

I suggest the following transition:

Start date in D.C.   May 1, 2000

From now till the start date, Michael will slowly transition into my group
but MAKE SURE that your activities are transitioned into someone else.  But I
would like to propose the May 1, 2000 date as hard start so that Michael will
have to start moving few days before that, etc.

Regards,

Ravi.


---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 09/26/2000
02:02 PM ---------------------------

"Iaconetti, Louis" <louis.iaconetti@csfb.com> on 09/22/2000 09:29:25 AM
To: "'Don Miller'" <Don.Miller@enron.com>, "'Benjamin Rogers'"
<Benjamin.Rogers@enron.com>
cc: "Bartlett, James" <james.bartlett@csfb.com>, "Al-Farisi, Omar"
<omar.al-farisi@csfb.com>, "Modi, Rishi" <rishi.modi@csfb.com>, "Heckler,
James" <james.heckler@csfb.com>
Subject: PG&E Questions

PG&E Gen is most interested in Pastoria and had several questions/concerns
that they asked about during my discussion with them:

* What is Enron's intent re: continuing involvement?  PG&E is
concerned about any potential requirements that they might be required to
either purchase fuel from Enron or engage Enron as the power marketer.
* What is status of EPC negotiations.  Will they be required to engage
NEPCO as the EPC contractor?  Does the EPC contractor have control over the
turbines?
* They also questioned whether there would be any "agricultural
restrictions"?

This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information.  No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the
sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve
the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.  Any
views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except
where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state
them to be the views of any such entity.
Unless otherwise stated, any pricing information given in this message is
indicative only, is subject to change and does not constitute an offer to
deal at any price quoted.
Any reference to the terms of executed transactions should be treated as
preliminary only and subject to our formal written confirmation.


User ID:  enronccw
PW:        bnaweb22

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"BNA Highlights" <bhighlig@bna.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22BNA+20Highlights+22+20+3Cbhighlig+40bna+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, July 31, 2001 11:22 PM
To:	BNA Highlights
Subject:	Aug. 1 -- BNA's Corporate Counsel Weekly

______________________________

BNA'S CORPORATE COUNSEL WEEKLY
Highlights & Table of Contents
August 1, 2001
______________________________

ISSN 1522-5305

Registered Web subscribers can access the full text of these
articles by using the URL link supplied.

Information about becoming a subscriber or signing up for a
FREE Web trial is available at http://web.bna.com or call
BNA Customer Relations at 1-800-372-1033, Mon. - Fri. 8:30
am - 7:00 pm (ET).
__________

HIGHLIGHTS
__________

Attorneys: Firm facing malpractice lawsuit over deal may
seek indemnity from opponent's lawyer who supplied documents
that he allegedly knew were false. . . Page 233

http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/ccw.nsf/id/a0a4m8f7b2_

Mergers and Acquisitions: Appraisal is sole remedy for
minority shareholders objecting to Delaware "short-form"
merger . . . Page 234

http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/ccw.nsf/id/a0a4n2e0h8_

Securities Fraud: "Group pleading doctrine" doesn't bar
allegations that officers failed to disclose "corporate
illness" . . . Page 234

http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/ccw.nsf/id/a0a4m9e4d6_

Attorneys: Lawyers appearing pro se must observe ex parte
rule . . . Page 235

http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/ccw.nsf/id/a0a4n1f0z7_

Securities: SEC publishes additional interpretations of
rules under '34 act's proxy, tender offer, going-private
rules . . . Page 235

http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/ccw.nsf/id/a0a4m9y0e7_

Antitrust Laws: FTC consent judgment doesn't preclude class
action by direct purchasers . . . Page 236

http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/ccw.nsf/id/a0a4m8n5x3_

Sex Discrimination: EEOC intake questionnaire isn't formal
administrative charge . . . Page 239

http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/ccw.nsf/id/a0a4n2a4t7_

________

Analysis
________

Mergers and Acquisitions: Jesse A. Finkelstein, Esq.,
discusses how to avoid entire fairness review in subsidiary
buy-out transactions . . . Page 240

http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/ccw.nsf/id/a0a4n1x3r7_

_________________

TABLE OF CONTENTS
_________________

Topical Summary

AGE DISCRIMINATION
   Disparate impact theory may not be pled under ADEA . . .
   Page 239
   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/ccw.nsf/id/a0a4n2a4w1_

ANTITRUST LAWS
   Direct purchaser claims not precluded by FTC's action . .
   . Page 236
   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/ccw.nsf/id/a0a4m8n5x3_

ATTORNEYS
   Firm defending malpractice lawsuit over deal may seek
   indemnity from opponent's counsel . . . Page 233
   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/ccw.nsf/id/a0a4m8f7b2_

   Out-of-State counsel receive limited pro hac vice status
   . . . Page 236
   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/ccw.nsf/id/a0a4m3z4q5_

   Rule prohibiting ex parte contacts applies to lawyers
   making pro se appearances . . . Page 235
   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/ccw.nsf/id/a0a4n1f0z7_

EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
   Contract workers' action for interference dismissed . . .
   Page 237
   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/ccw.nsf/id/a0a4k2x6j0_

JOB SAFETY & HEALTH
   OSHA unveils inspections that focus on most hazardous
   worksites . . . Page 238
   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/ccw.nsf/id/a0a4n2u1h4_

LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT
   Barring threatening language on job doesn't violate NLRA
   . . . Page 237
   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/ccw.nsf/id/a0a4m0e5v1_

MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS
   Delaware short-Form mergers don't invoke 'Entire
   fairness' . . . Page 234
   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/ccw.nsf/id/a0a4n2e0h8_

   Recent delaware court decisions show path to avoid entire
   fairness review in subsidiary buy-Out transactions . . .
   Page 240
   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/ccw.nsf/id/a0a4n1x3r7_

OUTSIDE AUDITORS
   Independence standards board ceases operations . . . Page
   238
   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/ccw.nsf/id/a0a4n2u1h1_

SEC
   Stephen cutler to serve as acting enforcement director .
   . . Page 238
   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/ccw.nsf/id/a0a4n2u1g5_

SECURITIES
   SEC issues interpretations of proxy, tender offer rules .
   . . Page 235
   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/ccw.nsf/id/a0a4m9y0e7_

SECURITIES ENFORCEMENT
   Pitt intends to review laws, promises to serve investors
   . . . Page 236
   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/ccw.nsf/id/a0a4m7y8v3_

SECURITIES FRAUD
   Group pleading doesn't bar claim for failure to disclose
   . . . Page 234
   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/ccw.nsf/id/a0a4m9e4d6_

SEX DISCRIMINATION
   EEOC intake questionnaire doesn't constitute charge . . .
   Page 239
   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/ccw.nsf/id/a0a4n2a4t7_

SEXUAL HARASSMENT
   Judge's sensitivities influence hostile work environment
   claims . . . Page 238
   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/ccw.nsf/id/a0a4n2u1h7_

STOCK OPTIONS
   FASB chairman says board has no plan to revisit stock
   options . . . Page 238
   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/ccw.nsf/id/a0a4n2u1g8_

SUCCESSOR EMPLOYERS
   New owner of plant required to recognize union . . . Page
   237
   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/ccw.nsf/id/a0a4k2v9j4_

______________

Table of Cases
______________

Adams v. Florida Power Corp. (11th Cir.) . . . Page 239
   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/ccw.nsf/id/a0a4n2a4w1_

Adtranz ABB Daimler-Benz Transportation NA Inc. v. NLRB
(D.C. Cir.) . . . Page 237
   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/ccw.nsf/id/a0a4m0e5v1_

Breda v. Wolf Camera Inc. (S.D. Ga.) . . . Page 238
   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/ccw.nsf/id/a0a4n2u1h7_

Dardick v. Zimmerman (N.D. Ill.) . . . Page 234
   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/ccw.nsf/id/a0a4m9e4d6_

Ferrey, In re (R.I. (per curiam)) . . . Page 236
   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/ccw.nsf/id/a0a4m3z4q5_

Glassman v. Unocal Exploration (Del.) . . . Page 234
   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/ccw.nsf/id/a0a4n2e0h8_

Hansen v. Anderson, Wilmarth & Van der Maaten (Iowa) . . .
Page 233
   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/ccw.nsf/id/a0a4m8f7b2_

Lorazepam & Clorazepate Antitrust Litigation, In re (D.D.C.)
. . . Page 236
   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/ccw.nsf/id/a0a4m8n5x3_

Montesano v. Xerox Corp. Retirement Income Guarantee Plan
(2d Cir. (per curiam)) . . . Page 237
   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/ccw.nsf/id/a0a4k2x6j0_

Pennsylvania Transformer Technology Inc. v. NLRB (D.C. Cir.)
. . . Page 237
   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/ccw.nsf/id/a0a4k2v9j4_

Pijnenburg v. West Georgia Health Systems Inc. (11th Cir.) .
. . Page 239
   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/ccw.nsf/id/a0a4n2a4t7_

Schaefer, In re (Nev. (per curiam)) . . . Page 235
   http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/ccw.nsf/id/a0a4n1f0z7_

   __________
   BNA's Corporate Counsel Weekly (ISSN 1522-5305)
   Highlights are published weekly by The Bureau of National
   Affairs, Inc., 1231 25th St., NW, Washington, DC 20037.

   For account information and changes, contact
   1-800-372-1033 (M-F, 8:30 am-7:00 pm ET)

   To request retransmission or to order a copy of the
   summarized article, contact 1-800-452-7773 or e-mail
   bnaplus@bna.com.

   For copyright guidelines, go to
   http://www.bna.com/corp/copyright.

   Copyright (c) 2001 by The Bureau of National Affairs,
   Inc.   Washington, D.C. 20037


[IMAGE]
To help celebrate the season, Skipping Stone is happy to offer you
a special limited time discount on our Deregulation of Texas Power Markets Report.
 Order your report todayfor $100 off the regular price of $995 any time before December 28th.
The newly updated Texas Report has all the facts on the Texas Power Market in one clear and coherent 100+ page report.
 Detailed Legislative Summary
 Comprehensive and Up-to-date Market Rules
Description of the Wholesale Markets
ERCOT Rules and Participation Requirements
Price to Beat and POLR Decisions and Opportunities
Complete Economic and Market Analyses
How to Work Within the Infrastructure
Comprehensive Review of the Pilot Program
The Latest Revised Market Participant Analysis
Key Contacts Information
And Much More!
 This Report will provide the information needed to decide whether and how to enter the Texas market and to develop a
business plan for market entry and to develop and market products.  Once purchased, you will have
up to 30 minutes of accessto Skipping Stone's experts to askany questions youmay have.
 Visit: http://www.skippingstone.com/product/txreport.htm or call 888-792-2592
for more information or to take advantage of this special offer!

This offer is good through 12/28/01.  The Report will be delivered electronically in a PDF format.
Each report is uniquely identified with an embedded identification number.  Unauthorized copying, electronically or otherwise,
of the report is a violation of federal law.  Skipping Stone offers a site license for up to ten copies for $4,595.


for your reading pleasure.

tim
---------------------- Forwarded by Tim Belden/HOU/ECT on 04/16/2001 07:25 AM ---------------------------

Alan Comnes
04/13/2001 01:50 PM
To:	gfergus@brobeck.com, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, rcarroll@bracepatt.com, Ray Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject:	Fw: Fact sheet re: Cal ISO study

From the Bonneville Power Administration:
>
> > This fact sheet addresses statements in a recent L.A. Times article
> > asserting that BPA, among others, manipulated prices on the California
> > electricity market.
> >
> > AEs, CAEs and other BPA staff may distribute the fact sheet to outside
> > parties as you believe appropriate.
> >
> >                       <<CA_sales_TP3.doc>>
> >
> > For additional information, contact Steve Oliver at (503) 230-3295.
>

 - CA_sales_TP3.doc


I would like to add some questions to the ones Dave has raised below.

1.  Would it make a difference if we were transacting Metals in a separate
web site from EOL?   I would see this as EnronMetals (the new name for MG)
running there own site issuing their own products.  I think we would need
this because we would be unable have an EnronOnline entity issuing LME
contracts with a sleeving arrangement to EnronMetals/MG.  My understanding is
that only a registered entity can issue LME Contracts.

2.  If we had to go to the separate site to address this issue, how would we
handle the links to EOL?  I assume people on EnronMetals could not trade
other products (ngas) on EnronMetals site.  Could we have a click through?
Would they have to sign in again?

bruce

David Forster
07/21/2000 08:43 PM
To: Bruce Garner/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lara Fields/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edmund
Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT, Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Amita Gosalia/LON/ECT@ECT, Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: MG

As you know, we are looking at doing the following with MG:

1) Moving the Market Maker Application into EnronOnline - effectively, by
putting the same products on EnronOnline as are currently on Market Maker,
then shutting down Market Maker and putting a hyperlink in to EnronOnline

2) Launching financial metals products on EnronOnline, which would transacted
by MG.

I have some concerns about both of these activities.

(1) Until today, I did not realise that the Market Maker application actually
involves the transaction of an LME contract. In other words, when a customer
buys from MG on the Market Maker app, they are buying LME contracts. We have
taken pains to distinguish between what we do on EnronOnline - which is to
transact on products which might settle against a published price vs.
transacting on the actual exchange contract.  As you know, Exchange contracts
are subject to a different set of regulations and scrutiny than currently
applies to EnronOnline.

(2) Because MG trades Exchange contracts on the floor of the exchange, they
are subject to more stringent regulations than Enron. I am concerned that if
MG is transacting financial products on EnronOnline, that EnronOnline could
come under greater scrutiny by the SFA. Paul: Can you comment on whether or
not this is a risk?  If this is a risk, would it be mitigated by having
another Enron company handle EnronOnline transactions (with sleeving back to
MG), or are we already sunk by virtue of the fact that MG is now in the Enron
family?

Comments from any/all recipients invited . . .

Thanks,

Dave


AllPro.com
Sports News | Injury Updates | Stats | Live Odds | Team Reports
SATURDAY NIGHT NFL SPECIAL - Baltimore at Tampa Bay (-1)
Sapp and the bunch are at home and 1 point favorites over the Ravens tonight. The Over/Under is 34 points.  Click here  to place a wager on the game and receive $25 FREE Cash to wager on Sunday's games!
$5 FREE for Joining
$20 FREE for Depositing
+10% Bonus Cash when you Sign Up TodayCLICK HERE TO JOIN ALLPRO TODAY!
WELCOME TO ALLPRO!
Join AllPro.com , place a wager on tonight's NFL contest, and you'll receive $25 FREE Cash to play on Sunday's games! AllPro.com  is safe, secure, and doesn't charge a fee! Plus, you'll get 10% CASH on Sign Up!
BET WITH CONFIDENCE
AllPro Sportsbook has been online since 1996 - join now! Click here!
GOT AN OPINION?
Turn your football wisdom into cold hard cash at AllPro.com   CLICK HERE TO JOIN ALLPRO TODAY!
 If you would rather not receive these messages, please  click here .  It will take up to 48 hours for your request to take effect.
All third party products and services promoted on this Site are offered exclusively by third party advertisers. Jackpot.com / Vendare Group makes no representations or warranties with respect to these offers and all claims for injury and damages related to such offers are the sole responsibility of the advertiser.


Hey Lynn,

Were you ever able to find a parking space for me?

Thanks,
Robin


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 05/15/2000 02:07
PM ---------------------------

Twyla_S._Strogen@DOM.COM on 05/15/2000 01:13:44 PM
To: Customer_Advisory_Board@DOM.COM
cc:
Subject: Notice

ATTENTION WEB E-SCRIPT USERS:

On Thursday, May 18, 2000, Web E-SCRIPT Users will be required to download an
updated
version of the plug-in to access the system.  You will be prompted to download
upon
launching the web page.  With slower connections, the download could take 20+
minutes.
Please contact the E-SCRIPT Help Line if you would like to receive a CD with
the
 plug-in.


FYI - see note below - already done.
Stella
---------------------- Forwarded by Stella L Morris/HOU/ECT on 12/14/99 10:18
AM ---------------------------
From: Sherlyn Schumack on 12/14/99 10:06 AM
To: Stella L Morris/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Issue

Stella,

This has already been taken care of.   You did this for me yesterday.

Thanks.

Howard B Camp
12/14/99 09:10 AM
To: Stella L Morris/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sherlyn Schumack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey
Neuweiler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Issue

Stella,
Can you work with Stacey or Daren to resolve
HC
---------------------- Forwarded by Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT on 12/14/99 09:08
AM ---------------------------

	From:  Sherlyn Schumack                           12/13/99 01:14 PM

To: Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Issue

I have to create accounting arrangement for purchase from Unocal Energy at
meter 986782.  Deal not tracked for 5/99.  Volume on deal 114427 expired 4/99.


I agree.   I told Gary you could make the call.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


Energy Committee Members:
Please find the minutes from our June 26 Energy Committee Meeting attached.
If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to contact me.

 - Energy Committee Meeting Minutes June 26.doc


I have made a few "clean-up" changes to the Financial Adoption Agreement and incorporated some comments from Carol.

Please use the attached version for any Financial deals.  Thaks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Van Hooser, Steve
Sent:	Friday, November  2, 2001 9:20 AM
To:	Koehler, Anne C.; Jones, Tana; McCullough, Travis; Murray, Julia; Sager, Elizabeth; Taylor, Mark E (Legal)
Cc:	Korkmas, Deb; Nettelton, Marcus
Subject:	Adoption Agreement applicable to ISDA Masters
Importance:	High

I have reviewed the attached draft with Anne, Travis and Marcus.  For purposes of maintaining consistency between the 3 disciplines, I would appreciate your using the attached for any further ISDA Adoption Agreements you may have.  Anne's suggested Item 7 to Scheule B should cut down your due diligence workload appreciably regaring the various places that Affiliate is used in the Master.

The main change from the draft Anne sent out yesterday evening is that it "reinserts" the Schedule C with Credit information.

Please call with any question.

Steve
 << File: MARKEDAdoption AgreementISDA(SVH 11-02-01).doc >>  << File: Adoption AgreementISDA(SVH 11-02-01).doc >>

Steve Van Hooser
Enron North America Corp.
713-853-7238
713-646-3490 (fax)


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Cantrell, Rebecca W.
Sent:	Thursday, November 08, 2001 1:28 PM
To:	Miller, Stephanie; Tholt, Jane M.; Shively, Hunter S.; Lucci, Paul T.
Subject:	Western Frontier Project

The FERC notice on this project has been issued and comments are due by November 21.  Do we have any interests that would warrant more than a plain intervention?  Let me know if you want a copy of the original filing, with maps, etc.

INSIDE FERC-October 29, 2001
WILLIAMS PUTS MEAT ON THE BONES OF WESTERN FRONTIER PROJECT DESIGN
Touting a need for more pipeline capacity linking the "prolific" supply basins of the central Rockies
and increasingly hungry Mid-Continent markets, The Williams Cos. Inc. last week took the next step by
filing for authorization to build and operate the Western Frontier project.
The sponsor has in hand four negotiated-rate deals for long-term service covering roughly two-thirds
of the 540,000 Dt/day of project design capacity, it told FERC in an Oct. 24 certificate application
(CP02-11). Williams wants to have the $366 million project up and running by Nov. 1, 2003; it
asked the commission to issue a final certificate by Dec. 11, 2002, so that it can commence construction
by the following April.
Williams unveiled initial plans for Western Frontier early last summer (IF, 9 July, 14) and held an open
season in June and July. To carry gas from the Power River, Big Horn, Wind River and Green River basins
- estimated to hold 173 Tcf of potential and recoverable reserves - the new 30-inch-diameter mainline
would run 398 miles, starting at the Cheyenne Hub and ending at an interconnection with the system of
affiliate Williams Gas Pipelines Central Inc. in Beaver County, Okla. Characterizing the Cheyenne Hub as
"a liquid point of supply," Williams asserted that "presently, supply capability to the hub has outpaced
transportation capacity away from the hub to market areas due to insufficient pipeline infrastructure."
Along the way, the Western Frontier mainline would make another interconnection with Williams
Central as well as with Northern Natural Gas Co., ANR Pipeline Co., Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America
and Panhandle Eastern Pipeline Co., "thus providing multiple avenues for gas produced in the central
Rockies to be transported throughout the Mid-Continent using the existing pipeline grid."
To "further enhance its supply options," the sponsor wants to build a 9.7-mile lateral from the
mainline to the Wattenberg gas processing plant east of Denver to tap the Denver-Julesberg basin. Rounding
out the project design are two new compressor stations, the 10,000-horsepower Chalk Bluff station to
be constructed at the Cheyenne Hub and the 20,000-hp Denver station to be built in Adams County, Colo.
Following the open season, Williams hammered out precedent agreements with Marathon Oil Co.
(75,000 Dt/day), Williams Energy Marketing and Trading Co. (200,000 Dt/day), Utilicorp United Inc.
(15,000 Dt/day) and Entergy Power Generation Corp. (75,000 Dt/day). The initial term for the deals is 10
years, except for Marathon which committed to a five-year term with an option to extend it an additional
two years, said the application.
"Other shippers have expressed serious interest for the remaining capacity on Western Frontier, and
active negotiations are moving forward with these potential shippers," said the application, adding that
Williams was "confident . . . that the remaining capacity will be committed in the upcoming months."
With the addition of compression, the project could "facilitate relatively inexpensive expansions to
accommodate future market growth," the sponsor told FERC. And that may well be necessary, it continued,
pointing to "stagnant to declining supply" in the Mid-Continent basins coupled with "projected demand
increases." As in many areas of the country, "much of the anticipated demand increase is attributed to
installation and operation of . . . gas-fired electrical generation," it said. The 11,439 Mw of "active winter
generating capacity" in the combined service areas of Western Frontier and Williams Central is expected to
more than double by 2004, said Williams.
The application seeks negotiated rate authority for the project operator, Western Frontier Pipeline
Co. LLC, and approval of initial recourse rates. The maximum daily reservation rate under schedule FTS
would be 35?/Dt for contract demand in Zone 1 and 79.4?/Dt in Zone 2.
Under the negotiated deals reached with the four "anchor" shippers, Utilicorp and Entergy would pay a
combined reservation and commodity rate of 25?/Dt at a 100% load factor for Zone 1 service to the
Williams Central Hugoton station in Kansas, while WEM&T would pay a combined rate of 30?/Dt for
Zone 2 transportation to the Williams Central system in Oklahoma and Marathon would pay 32?/Dt under
the shorter contract for Zone 2 service to interconnects with ANR, Panhandle and Williams Central in
Oklahoma. All transportation would originate at the Cheyenne Hub.


----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 12/04/2000 09:13 AM -----

	Sara Shackleton
	10/20/2000 11:09 AM

		 To: Clint Freeland/Corp/Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Enron Corp. ISDA Master Agreements

here it is
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 10/20/2000 11:08 AM -----

	Sara Shackleton
	10/16/2000 05:09 PM

		 To: William S Bradford/HOU/ECT
		 cc: Clint Freeland/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeff Nogid/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Enron Corp. ISDA Master Agreements

Bill:  The Enron Corp. board passed a resolution last week authorizing equity
transactions on ENE stock.  Clint and Jeff are anxious to proceed with the
negotiation of ISDA Master Agreements with the parties we have been
discussing.  Please send credit to me for preparation of documentation.  As
always, please let me know if you have any questions.  Thanks.  Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 10/16/2000 05:06 PM -----

	Sara Shackleton
	09/18/2000 03:00 PM

		 To: William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Jeff Nogid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clint Freeland/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Enron Corp. ISDA Master Agreements

Bill:  I am resending my earlier message which identifies the correct legal
entities with which Enron Corp. would like to execute ISDA Master Agreements
(for the purpose of entering into equity trades).  In addition to the
entities listed below, we need to include "Merrill Lynch International"
("MLI").  ENA just negotiated an agreement with MLI, so the Enron Corp.
master should be fairly simple.  Also, Clint and Jeff are interested in
transacting with Toronto Dominion Bank.  In that regard I note that Enron has
an Interest Rate and Currency Agreement with Toronto Dominion Bank, New York
Branch.  I'll review this agreement to see if it requires amendment.

Jeff/Clint:  Do want to deal with a specific Toronto Dominion branch?

All:  I will expect that Bill will provide credit worksheets and I'll either
begin the ISDA process or change "ENA" to Enron Corp. on those agreements
which have previously been sent.

Thanks.  Let me know if you have any questions.  Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 09/18/2000 02:46 PM -----

	Sara Shackleton
	08/23/2000 05:47 PM

		 To: William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rod
Nelson/LON/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Enron Corp. ISDA Master Agreements

All:  Before Rod became a Brit, we were working with Enron Corp. treasury to
put in place some masters in the name of ENA for the following parties:

Bear, Stearns Internaitonal Limited
Credit Agricole Indosuez
CSFB International
Lehman Brother Finance S.A.
Morgan Stanley Capital Services Inc.
Deutsche Bank

These masters will be used to for equity deals on ENE stock.  The Treasury
group has concluded together with Rex Rogers and V&E, that Enron Corp. is the
appropriate swap counterparty for these masters and NOT ENA.

Who in credit will be available to assist me in this process?  Thanks.  Sara


here you go, man


> A man walks into a bar with an ostrich behind him.  The bartender asks
> for his order, and the man says, "I'll have a beer," and turns to the
> ostrich. "What's yours?"
>
> "I'll have a beer, too," says the ostrich.
>
> The bartender pours the beer and says, "That will be $3.40 please," and
> the man reaches into his pocket and pulls out exact change for payment.
>
> The next day, the man and the ostrich come again, and both order a beer.
> Once again, the man reaches into his pocket and pays with exact
> change.  This becomes a   routine until, late one evening, the two enter
> again and the bartender asks, "The usual?"
>
> "Well, it's close to last call, so I'll have a large scotch," says the
> man.
>
> "Same for me," says the ostrich.
>
> "That will be $7.20," says the bartender. Once again, the man pulls exact
> change out of his pocket and places it on the bar.  The bartender can't
> hold back his curiosity any longer. "Excuse me, sir. How do you
> manage to come up with the exact change out of your pocket every time?"
>
> Well," says the man, "several years ago I was cleaning the attic, and I
> found an old lamp.  When I rubbed it, a genie appeared and offered me
> two wishes.  My first wish was that if I ever had to pay for anything, I
> just put my hand in my pocket, and the right amount of money will
> always be there."
>
> "That's brilliant!" says the bartender.  "Most people would wish for a
> million dollars or something, but you'll always be as rich as you want
> for as long as you live!
>
> "That's right!  Whether it's a gallon of milk or a Rolls Royce, the
> exact money is always there," says the man.
>
> The bartender asks, "One other thing, sir; what's with the ostrich?"
>
> The man replies, "My second wish was for a chick with long legs."


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 11/15/2000
10:02 AM ---------------------------

"John D. Martin" <J_Martin@baylor.edu> on 11/15/2000 08:42:58 AM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Good morning

Vince,

Attached you will find a draft "thought document" based on our
conversations yesterday.  I think that it captures much of my
recollections.  Please edit it to your liking and pass it back to me.  In
the next steps I have laid out a plan of action that should lead us to a
successful conclusion and a draft by Christmas.

Let me emphasize that this is a working document so feel free to modify it
in whatever ways you think appropriate (don't be bashful--I want us to get
this right).

Have a great day.

Your friend,

John

 - EnronInterview.doc

John D. Martin
Carr P. Collins Chair in Finance
Finance Department
Baylor University
PO Box 98004
Waco, TX 76798
254-710-4473 (Office)
254-710-1092 (Fax)
J_Martin@Baylor.edu
web:    http://hsb.baylor.edu/html/martinj/home.html


As a follow up to our meeting with the traders last week about litigation
risks,  I have drafted the attached hypos (so far) for discussion about legal
risks in the changing landscape.  Let me know if you have any comments.


Chris:

Please forward to me the two underlying agreements (the Securities Purchase
Agreement and the Project Development Agreement) along with amendment 1 to
the PDA. Did we ever receive an executed amendment from AES? Please call
Steve Hasse to follow up.

I'd like to get together with you today to go over this so that we can meet
with Kay and provide her our commercial input. We will also need to prepare a
DASH for this proposed amendment as it changes the timing and risk of payment
relative to the underlying deal. Please get a copy of the Haywood DASH, so
that you and I can review it and then provide guidance to credit.

Thanks,

Ben
---------------------- Forwarded by Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT on 04/23/2001 11:25 AM
---------------------------

"Steve Hase" <shase@aesc.com> on 04/20/2001 02:40:47 PM
To: ben.jacoby@enron.com
cc: chris.booth@enron.com, prollin@aesc.com, ALouison@hunton.com,
mbarr@hunton.com
Subject: Amendments to Extend May 1

Ben,

Attached are draft amendments to the Greystone Project Development
Agreement and the Securities Purchase Agreement to implement our agreement
to extend to August 1 the deadline for meeting the Development Milestones
and closing the purchase of the interests and creating a mechanism to
purchase the interests in the company in the event we need to do so before
Enron meets the development
milestones.

I'd be pleased to discuss with you at your earliest convenience.

Steve Hase

 - Am No. 1 to SPA 4-20.doc
 - Am No. 2 to PDA 4-20.DOC


Q:  I am on a H1-B Visa.  What assistance is the company providing me?
A:  Enron is required to pay for a one-way, coach ticket for the employee only.  Please contact ______ for necessary arrangements.
(Michelle, what else can we say about timing, when we submitted names to the INS, etc?

Q:  Will I be able to receive severance in the future if I file for unemployment?
A:  There is no company offset for State unemployment benefits against the $4,500.  You are able to file for unemployment immediately after your termination date.  If you receive additional severance in the future, it will be offset by any unemployment wages you have received.

Q:  Will I be paid for any unused vacation? (we've already answered this broadly, but are getting a ton of specific questions around vacation now b/c they are thinking that it is being treated as an expense)
A:  The $4,500 payment included payment for all pre-petition compensation including unused vacation time, WARN notification, and incentive and overtime pay.  Employees are entitled to pursue any claims for amounts in excess of $4,500 in the bankruptcy proceeding.  The link for the claim form is included below.


Start Date: 4/25/01; HourAhead hour: 7;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042507.txt


Notice No:  01-72
February 27, 2001

NYMEX HOLDINGS, INC.
CANDIDATES, FORUM

Please be advised that a NYMEX Holdings, Inc. candidates, member forum is
scheduled to be held on THURSDAY, MARCH 8, 2001 at 3:45 p.m. in the Board
Rooms of the Exchange, One North End Avenue, New York City.

At that time, each candidate will be given the opportunity to address the
membership regarding the 2001 Annual Elections scheduled to be held on
Tuesday, March 20, 2001.

Inquiries regarding the aforementioned may be directed to Donna Talamo at
(212) 299-2372.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=tana.jones@enron.com&refdo
c=(01-72)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


Currently, TW isolates a portion of the Panhandle lateral to force production received into the pipe downstream of the P-3 compressor station to physically flow north east, to a interconnect with Northern.  The POI's downstream of this block valve are removed from the IT template to avoid that an "all points" contract is tendered. This would allow the scheduling system to accept a nomination from these particular points to an "upstream" point, and we currently prohibit this.

Historically, this gas was isolated to assure it flowed to an interconnect that would deliver into a process gas stream on Northern's mainline, for ultimate processing at Bushton or CMS's Beaver plant.  When shippers have requested that this gas be scheduled to markets other than NNG, (i.e. California or Waha) they were told it could not deviate from this predetermined path.

CMS has indicated they will no longer flow this gas to TW starting in March (volume is from 15,000 to 20,000 mmbut/d at an $0.08 rate), and will instead seek a pipeline that will allow them access to the West Texas and California markets.  Once this gas is diverted from our pipe it will not return.

My questions are:

Darrell: Is there an operational reason why this gas can not flow south on the Panhandle lateral?  Is there a quality issue?  I recall the gas was diverted to NNG for the benefit OneOk and the Buston plant.  The asset sale we anticipated with KN never   materialized, and thus our attempt to load the buston plant from these facilities is not going to benefit us.

Susan/Lee:  Can TW discriminate service if there is not a gas quality issue that would otherwise shut the gas in as unmerchantable?  We receive gas South of the block valve and it is able to flow on the Panhandle lateral to Waha and California markets.  The fact that this gas is downstream of a valve we closed for the convenience and benefit of NNG and OneOk is the only reason it can not flow to other points on TW.  Is this a supportable position if a shipper elected to challenge it?

Steve:  Do you think OneOk still expects this valve to be closed?  Would they object if it was opened?  If this gas goes to El Paso, it would be lost for processing by OneOk anyway.

Could we get together sometime Monday AM between 8:30 and 9:30 to discuss this?

Thanks, Bob


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 06/27/2000
08:09 AM ---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski
06/27/2000 08:05 AM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc:
Subject:

Test


Accepted meeting at 4:30, EB 3824.

Jackie Martin  for Gina Corteselli


Attached is the document you had me type up.


The server that provides Print Services (Print Services allow you to print to
a LAN printer) will be updated today from 11:00 am to 1:00 pm to address an
application issue.   During this maintenance window  you may experience
intermittent LAN printing problems.  Local printing will not impacted.

If for any reason this maintenance window is longer than the estimated 2
hours, I will send a broadcast message via your workstation screen with any
new updates.

If you have any questions, issues or concerns with this outage please contact
me directly.

Thanks.  Jean  x7173


Shirley Tijerina - 58113


The note below was a portion of Terry Galassini's Weekly Report.  I wasn't
sure if either of you have been a part of the test information.

**Gallup Compressor Station & Mainline Expansion
A field test was completed and initial results indicate a compressor
efficiency around 80 - 82% which is within Cooper's guarantee.  A not to
exceed cost of $3 Million was provided to Marketing for station modifications
to facilitate an incremental mainline (West of Thoreau) firm capacity of 10
MMcf/d.    Additional work by E&C to fine tune the not to exceed estimate is
targeted for completion by December 8th.  The mainline expansion potential is
directly related to Gallup since the discharge pressure must be increased to
970 psig to achieve an additional 10 MMcf/d on the mainline.  The San Juan
Lateral firm capacity would remain at 850 MMcf/d.


In a conversation with Randy Miller of Texla, the following credit issues
were raised:

1.  Texla would like to raise their threshold to $200,000;
2.   In place of a LC  Texla would offer furture trades  within 24 hours.

As previously discussed, I can write the language, the decision is a credit
call.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Please take me off your email list

Jennifer Green <jgreen@aedc.org> on 09/01/2000 02:50:03 PM
To: "AEDC Members":;
cc:
Subject: data standards

Dear AEDC Member,

One of the most interesting developments in the economic development arena
is the creation of the AEDC/CUED/EDAC Site Selection Data Standard.  This
standard, long in the making, provides an opportunity for economic
developers and their customers to have one common means of presenting and
examining data.  Adoption of the standard promises real time savings and
more effective economic development decisions as communities will be more
comparable than ever before.

A copy of the standards is attached so that you can take a look at it to
see how the data standards can be made to work for you.  There are 25
tables in the standard presented in an excel format.  The tabs at the
bottom of the page will access the additional tables.

You can assemble your own data for the data standard tables or you can use
the services of ACN, the American Community Network. AEDC has entered into
a strategic partnership with ACN to provide much of the data necessary for
the standards.  ACN will provide data and provide future updates of the
standard to AEDC members at a discounted rate. It is your call as to which
approach works best for you.

Adoption of the standards promises great changes for the economic
development profession.  They should be of particular advantage to the many
areas that have great economic development opportunities but which haven't
received the consideration they deserve.  The standards are a great way to
tell their story.

If you'd like more information on the use of the standards, look for
notices of upcoming courses offered with AEDC's National Seminars on the
standards and their use.

Paul Lawler
AEDC

 - SSDSTF Datatables 97 June 00.xls


We are currently experiencing problems with the M:\ drive, the IT team in Houston is working on the problem. I will notify everyone with a follow-up email when the issue is resolved.


Good Morning,

Just a reminder to get your AGA estimates in by Noon EST (11:00 CST).

Last Year      - 97
Last Week      + 7

Thank You,
Daryl Dworkin
BNP PARIBAS Commodity Futures, Inc.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le "message") sont etablis a l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires et sont confidentiels. Si vous recevez ce message par erreur, merci de le detruire et d'en avertir immediatement l'expediteur.

Toute utilisation de ce message non conforme a sa destination, toute diffusion ou toute publication, totale ou partielle, est interdite, sauf autorisation expresse.

L'internet ne permettant pas d'assurer l'integrite de ce message, BNP PARIBAS (et ses filiales) decline(nt) toute responsabilite au titre de ce message, dans l'hypothese ou il aurait ete modifie.
	----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message and any attachments (the "message") are intended solely for the addressees and are confidential. If you receive this message in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender.

Any use not in accord with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited except formal approval.

The internet can not guarantee the integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not therefore be liable for the message if modified.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


Here is another San Diego class action complaint filed December 6, 2000.
Enron is not named.

Thanks.
Gary

 <<Rojoin.cmplt.PDF>>

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com

 - Rojoin.cmplt.PDF


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 05/23/2001 01:24 PM -----

	"Anne Marie DeFelice" <adefelice@ggfcmk.com>
	05/23/2001 12:41 PM

		 To: <Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: CalPx Participants' Committee Conference Call

Attached is our contact list.

>>> <Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com> 5/23/2001 8:22:00 AM >>>

Do you have a list of the PX participants committee that you could send me
by e-mail.

**************************
* Confidentiality Notice *
**************************

This message is intended solely for the use of the addressee(s) and is
intended to be privileged and confidential within the attorney client
privilege.  If you have received this message in error, please immediately
notify the sender and delete all copies of this email message along with all
attachments.  Thank you.
 - 1197575.pdf


For your information/approval.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/21/2000 07:09
PM ---------------------------

"Thompson, Peter J." <peterthompson@akllp.com> on 12/21/2000 07:06:37 PM
To: "Kay Mann (E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Kent. Shoemaker (E-mail)" <kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com>, "Lee. Johnson
(E-mail)" <lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com>, "Brett. R. Wiggs (E-mail)"
<Brett.R.Wiggs@enron.com>, "John. R. Ayres (E-mail)"
<john.r.ayres@enron.com>, "Tim Oxley (E-mail)" <toxley@winston.com>, "Ben.
Jacoby (E-mail)" <Ben.Jacoby@enron.com>, "Roseann Engeldorf (E-mail)"
<roseann.engeldorf@enron.com>, "Cheryl. Lipshutz (E-mail)"
<Cheryl.Lipshutz@enron.com>, "Pipitone, Paul" <paulpipitone@akllp.com>,
<michael.storm@ss.ps.ge.com>, "Cobb, Chris" <chriscobb@akllp.com>, "Taylor,
Rob" <robtaylor@akllp.com>

Subject: Enron South America Facility Agreement and Exhibits

Attached please find the final version of the above-referenced document.
You will note that Exhibit H-2 is not included in the electronic copy.
It is included, however, in the execution copy being sent to you via
Federal Express.

Should you have any questions or comments, please don't hesitate to
contact me.

Peter Thompson

 <<ESA Break-out Agreement  Execution Copy.DOC>>


If we are replacing an existing Master Agreement with an ISDA Master
Agreement, please change the status in the master swap agreement database
from "Executed" to "Executed-Under Amendment".  Once a master is executed,
"Executed" or "Executed-Under Amendment" should be the only two options you
should ever choose.  If you change it to "Draft Sent", "Under Negotiation",
etc., it wipes that counterparty's master from the list of executed masters.


Attached is the NDA you requested.

	Fred Philipson/ENRON@enronXgate
	04/25/2001 04:29 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: NDA Request

One Jackson Square
Jackson, MI 49201

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Jones, Tana
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 4:29 PM
To: Philipson, Fred
Subject: Re: NDA Request

Do you have the address for the counterparty?

	Fred Philipson/ENRON@enronXgate 04/25/2001 04:17 PM 	   To: Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT  cc:   Subject: NDA Request

Tana:

Can you please mail back an NDA with the following information within it:

Prospect:
CMS Energy Marketing Services and Trading (Legal name)

Topic:
Using Enron's back office services to process their energy deal transactions.

This has nothing to do with EnronOnline.  Please do not include EnronOnline
terminology in the NDA, as it will only delay this effort.  Thanks in advance
for your timely response.

Fred Philipson
5-9323


Rob, I think we should renew the flame for the three year period.  My
understanding is that it is $75 K Cdn per year roughly.  Not paid up-front
and cancellable if Flames leave Calgary or disappear.  Expense in Canada.  It
is your call ultimately.

Regards
Delainey


Market Participants:

During the bankruptcy court teleconference on discovery yesterday it was
determined that 1) for the moment, the ISO has been relieved of the
obligation to respond to the subpoena, and 2) PG&E will file a motion with
the bankruptcy judge requesting the information it requires from the ISO and
the PX.  The motion will be served on the primary contact for each ISO
scheduling coordinator.  Parties will have an opportunity to respond.
Market Participants with concerns about discovery matters in the PG&E
bankruptcy proceeding should make sure they get papers from the Scheduling
Coordinator primary contact in a timely manner and be prepared to present
their own positions to the bankruptcy court.  Market Participants should not
rely on the ISO to make their arguments for them.

In accordance with the tariff, the ISO will continue to provide notice of
any subpoenas it receives that request information covered under section
20.3.  However, once this notice has been given, Market Participants have
the obligation to take the steps they deem appropriate to seek protective
orders or other relief from the bankruptcy court and should not rely on the
ISO to argue their positions for them or to provide ongoing notices of every
development related to a subpoena after the initial notice of its reciept is
given.

Jeanne M. Sol?
Regulatory Counsel
California ISO
(916) 608-7144
____________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________

The Foregoing e-Mail Communication (Together With Any Attachments Thereto)
Is Intended For The Designated Recipient(s) Only. Its Terms May Be
Confidential And Protected By Attorney/Client Privilege or Other Applicable
Privileges.  Unauthorized Use, Dissemination, Distribution, Or Reproduction
Of This Message Is Strictly Prohibited.


Issue has been resolved.  Please disregard.  The $500M amount quoted below
was eventually changed to $0 and reconfirmed.

thanks
brant

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Reves, Brant
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 11:37 AM
To: Shackleton, Sara
Cc: Bailey, Susan; Boyd, Samantha; Panus, Stephanie; Mendoza, Nidia; Reves,
Brant
Subject: Inconsistant Credit Amounts

Gas Producers Liquids Inc. - Omnibus confirmations only - No ISDA

How do we margin this LC customer when the Exposure Thresholds are not
consistant across each Annex B?  Their financial mark to market exposure is
currently $1.3MM.

		Annex
Trades		B-Credit Line

QL3281.1		$0
QL3360.1		$0
QN8251.1		$0
QN8251.2		$0
QQ7096.1		$0
QQ7109.1		$500,000
QR4386.1		$0
QS3259.1		$0
QS3259.2		$25,000

Brant


Hi Mary...
CONGRATS!  I wish you all of the best.
I enjoyed working with you and hope your new adventure suits you well.
Please keep in touch...
Cindy
_______________________________________________
Cindy Tatham
Recycling Project Specialist
Washington County Solid Waste & Recycling
155 N. First Ave., MS-4
Hillsboro, OR  97124
cindy_tatham@co.washington.or.us
503-846-3651
503-846-4928 fax
________________________________________________
Visit the Washington County website at: www.co.washington.or.us/recycle
Visit the Business Recycling Awards Group (BRAG) website at:
www.BRAGaward.org
Visit the Waste Reduction Action Information Network (WRAIN)
at:www.WRAIN.org

> ----------
> From:  Mary.Hain@enron.com[SMTP:Mary.Hain@enron.com]
> Sent:  Friday, March 23, 2001 10:24 AM
> To:  David_Aamodt@pgn.com; dapnucc@teleport.com; dick@pnucc.org;
> seabron.adamson@frontier-economics.com; Frank_Afranji@pgn.com;
> raa@vnf.com; Joseph.Alamo@enron.com; ajaldrich@snopud.com;
> Jeff.Alexander@enron.com; Al.Alexanderson@enron.com;
> Keonee.Almaida@enron.com; hollis.alpert@ferc.fed.us;
> Brenda.Anderson@enron.com; angles@howry.com; Alan.B.Aronowitz@enron.com;
> gdb@vnf.com; npbaker@bpa.gov; ellen@tca-us.com; paulb@citizenspower.com;
> paulb@citizenspower.com; garybarbour@email.msn.com;
> jbartus@cammckenna.com; glynda.becker@mail.house.gov;
> Samuel.Behrends@enron.com; bbennett@bpa.gov; sberman@hewm.com;
> ramsen.betfarhad@mail.house.gov; KBILAS@SKADDEN.COM; sbooye@Skadden.com;
> raymond.r.boyce@state.or.us; tbradley@bracepatt.com;
> scott.brattebo@pacificorp.com; sbrose@steptoe.com;
> sbuchheit@bracepatt.com; alanb@wutc.wa.gov; Jim.Byrne@enron.com;
> vergil.cabasco@mail.house.gov; johncameron@dwt.com;
> Doug.Carmichael@enron.com; Ed.Cassidy@enron.com; ajchambe@llgm.com;
> Melissa.Chiechi@enron.com; elchristensen@snopud.com;
> kevin.clark@ci.seattle.wa.us; rcloward@avistacorp.com;
> david_cohen@rniinc.com; Bill.Comish@enron.com; Victor.Contract@enron.com;
> powerlac@aol.com; Frederick.Coolbroth@enron.com;
> michaelcorrigan@bchydro.bc.ca; kcorum@nwppc.org; KCurry@bracepatt.com;
> wcurry@enron.com; gdahlke@paine-hamblen.com; kadaly@mcimail.com;
> mday@gmssr.com; dearing@chelanpud.org; tdeboer@paine-hamblen.com;
> Tom_Delaney@enron.com; sdleonard@earthlink.net; dldorrell@stoel.com;
> Mary.Doyle@enron.com; Jay.Dudley@enron.com; mce2280@idahopower.com;
> michaelearly@earthlink.net; Katherine.Edwards@enron.com;
> rle@givenspursley.com; imaxtrans@aol.com; Chris.Elliott@enron.com;
> sandra.elliott@ferc.fed.us; kerwin@ect.enron.com; dezickson@mwe.com;
> Jim.Fallon@enron.com; fallonr@howrey.com; Elias.Farrah@enron.com;
> Michele_Farrell@pgn.com; dfaulk@puget.com; gfergus@brobeck.com;
> Willard.Fields@enron.com; sfisher@avistaenergy.com; pfox@bracepatt.com;
> Pat.Franklin@enron.com; John.Frazzell@enron.com; ericf@prestongates.com;
> don.furman@pacificorp.com; segfurst@bpa.gov; Jackie.Gallagher@enron.com;
> craiggannett@dwt.com; Alvaro.Garcia@enron.com; sbishop@gibbs-bruns.com;
> wgibson@nwppc.org; ggilbert@ci.tacoma.wa.us; Pat.Gilman@enron.com;
> Alex.Goldberg@enron.com; jlgreene@energyadvocates.com;
> Chris_Groener@mail.house.gov; Mary.Groggin@enron.com;
> Mark.E.Haedicke@enron.com; Stephen.Hall@enron.com; steve.c.hall@enron.com;
> Leo.Hamblin@enron.com; whannaford@NWPPC.org; jim.harding@ci.seattle.wa.us;
> rhardy@hardyenergy.com; kharri@puget.com; Steve_Hawke@pgn.com;
> dhawkins@caiso.com; marc.hellman@state.or.us; Scott.Helyer@enron.com;
> mhenry@bracepatt.com; dwmp@teleport.com; rhornby@tca-us.com;
> mhornst@aol.com; dhuard@jmbm.com; Marlene.Huntsinger@pgn.com;
> cfi1@tca-us.com; Richard.Ingersoll@enron.com; pljacklin@stoel.com;
> montrey@aol.com; danj@cfmdc.com; kgjohnson@bpa.gov; ljohnson@pwrteam.com;
> Karen.E.Jones@enron.com; mkanner@kannerandassoc.com;
> karid@perkinscoie.com; pkaufma@ect.enron.com; Paul.Kaufman@enron.com;
> Jeffrey.Keeler@enron.com; Devon Kehoe; James.Keller@enron.com;
> Joe.Kelliher@mail.house.gov; kkennedy@bdbc.com; Rick.Kessler@enron.com;
> rdking@bpa.gov; Harry.Kingerski@enron.com; Harry.Kingerski@enron.com;
> rsk@schwabe.com; gwilliams8@austin.rr.com; John.Klauberg@enron.com;
> Holli.Krebs@enron.com; ekrogh@wiredweb.com; blafferty@avistacorp.com;
> wdlamb@bpa.gov; John.Lamb@enron.com; Therese.Lamb@enron.com;
> srlarson@bpa.gov; Cindy_Tatham@co.washington.or.us;
> zora.lazic@bchydro.com; kaleathley@bpa.gov; pamela_lesh@pgn.com;
> Debi.LeVine@enron.com; lcg@europa.com; doug.little@powerex.com;
> Robert.Loeffler@enron.com; Chris.Long@enron.com; sjlong@bpa.gov;
> rlopezv@www.conet.com.mx; david_lucio@iep.illinova.com;
> king.lum@bchydro.bc.ca; kevin.lynch@pacificorp.com; Mark.Maehr@enron.com;
> Randal.T.Maffett@enron.com; John.Malowney@enron.com; Sueyen.Mao@enron.com;
> Susan.J.Mara@enron.com; Susan.J.Mara@enron.com; Lee.Martin@enron.com;
> maurw@perkinscoie.com; Wayne.Mays@enron.com; Michael.McCall@enron.com;
> Sandra.McCubbin@enron.com; Travis.McCullough@enron.com;
> Michael.McDonald@enron.com; brugen@erols.com; mckinley@wpuda.org;
> mcm@vnf.com; mcnichol@wapa.com; shauna@pnucc.org;
> Maureen.McVicker@enron.com; pmeringolo@brobeck.com; demetcalf@bpa.gov;
> cemeyer@bpa.gov; jmilegich@sppc.com; fred_miller@pgn.com;
> Jeffrey.Miller@enron.com; jerry.miller@pacificorp.com;
> Laura.Miller@enron.com; scott.miller@ferc.fed.us; Bill.Miner@enron.com;
> phil_moeller@gorton.senate.gov; pmohler@hewm.com; emoler@velaw.com;
> nkmorgado@bpa.gov; Mike@tonkon.com; krmoxness@bpa.gov;
> mmps@millcreeklaw.com; pmurphy@mbllp.com; terrym@millcreeklaw.com;
> bmurtha@acy.sunint.com; Rich.Nassief@enron.com; tod@mgninc.com;
> Douglas_Nichols@pgn.com; Patty.Nichols@enron.com;
> Christi.Nicolay@enron.com; tmnoguchi@bpa.gov; darcy@tonkon.com;
> Sarah.Novasel@enron.com; Sarah.Novosel@enron.com; Tom.O'Donnell@enron.com;
> PObenchain@idahopower.com; Pegy.Olds@enron.com; Carol.Opatrny@enron.com;
> tpaine@avistacorp.com; Dave.Parquet@enron.com; bpascoe@mtpower.com;
> afpaschke@bpa.gov; ccperigo@bpa.gov; wlpernas@stoel.com;
> lpeters@pacifier.com; jill@pnucc.org; Mona.L.Petrochko@enron.com;
> npickover@bracepatt.com; Phillip.Platter@enron.com;
> Alfred.Pollard@enron.com; Walt.Pollock@enron.com; gporter@sppc.com;
> Kevin.M.Presto@enron.com; jquint@puget.com;
> arlene.ragozin@ci.seattle.wa.us; maraschio@bpa.gov;
> Dale.Rasmussen@enron.com; Scott.Rasmussen@enron.com;
> Bobby.Reeves@enron.com; preiten@pngc.com; reyna2r@kochind.com;
> shellyr@pacifier.com; Jeff.Richter@enron.com; raroach@bpa.gov;
> atrodrigues@bpa.gov; rarogers@bpa.gov; peterroi@erols.com;
> Rothfelder@rlo-law.com; Richard.Sanders@enron.com; jsaven@pacifier.com;
> Michael.Schilmoeller@enron.com; jschlect@avistacorp.com;
> Sabine.Schnittger@frontier-economics.com; Diana.Scholtes@enron.com;
> Roger.Seifert@enron.com; Cara.Semperger@enron.com;
> asettanni@bracepatt.com; Richard.Shapiro@enron.com; vsharp@enron.com;
> msmith1@enron.com; Joshua.Sheinkman@enron.com; jshurts@nwppc.org;
> Sid@enron.com; msizer@ci.tacoma.wa.us; slavens.paula@deps.ppl.com;
> small@wrightlaw.com; small@wrightlaw.com; douglas.smith@ferc.fed.us;
> Mike.Smith@enron.com; Roger.Smith@enron.com; Larry.Soderquist@enron.com;
> Harvey.Spigal@enron.com; mstauffer@mtpower.com; James.D.Steffes@enron.com;
> James.D.Steffes@enron.com; mestewardpsedc@worldnet.att.net;
> JKStier@BPA.gov; rbstrong@paine-hamblen.com; DASwanstrom@Verner.com;
> Mike.Swerzbin@enron.com; tabors@tca-us.com; Ron.Tapscott@enron.com;
> James.K.Tarpey@enron.com; Jake.Thomas@enron.com;
> ryan_thomas@burns.senate.gov; jrt2058@idahopower.com; maryann@pnucc.org;
> mtierney@sempra.com; robin_tompkins@pgn.com; Ann.Tumlinson@enron.com;
> AW.Turner@enron.com; Sheila.Tweed@enron.com; Lisa.Urick@enron.com;
> rvermeers@avistacorp.com; Frank.W.Vickers@enron.com;
> John.Walley@enron.com; kristiwallis@sprintmail.com; walshl@howrey.com;
> swalton@enron.com; Steve.Walton@enron.com; kaward@bpa.gov;
> Kim.Ward@enron.com; Carol.Wardell@enron.com; dwatkiss@bracepatt.com;
> sawatson@bpa.gov; judy.welch@NWPP.ORG; 211-6155@MCIMAIL.COM;
> Kwenzel@zzz.com; cwestadt@sppc.com; Brian.Whalen@enron.com;
> Bill.Williams@enron.com; klwmtp@worldnet.att.net; lyn_williams@pgn.com;
> Greg.Wolfe@enron.com; Vickie.Wolk-Laniewski@enron.com; Ed.Wood@enron.com;
> mwood@stoel.com; Steve.Wright@enron.com; Teresa.L.Wright@enron.com;
> WSCC@enron.com; Charles.Yeung@enron.com; Christian.Yoder@enron.com;
> Steven.J.Kean@enron.com; Steve.Kean@enron.com;
> Travel.in.the.Park@enron.com; D.Brett.Hunsucker@enron.com;
> Carla.Hoffman@enron.com; Bernadette.Hawkins@enron.com;
> Joe.Hartsoe@enron.com; Donna.Fulton@enron.com; Roger.Fragua@enron.com;
> James.B.Fallon@enron.com; Michael.Etringer@enron.com;
> Terry.W.Donovan@enron.com; Stacy.Dickson@enron.com;
> Ginger.Dernehl@enron.com; Rhonda.L.Denton@enron.com;
> Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com; Sean.Crandall@enron.com; Tom.Briggs@enron.com;
> t.briggs@enron.com; Stacey.Bolton@enron.com; dbenevid@enron.com;
> dbenevid@enron.com; Tim.Belden@enron.com; Robert.Badeer@enron.com;
> Phillip.K.Allen@enron.com; Alan.Comnes@enron.com; Lysa.Akin@enron.com;
> Portland.West.Desk@enron.com; assad@elektro.com.br; Alan.Comnes@enron.com;
> Alberto.Levy@enron.com; Aleck.Dadson@enron.com; Allison.Navin@enron.com;
> Amy.Fabian@enron.com; Barbara.A.Hueter@enron.com;
> Bernadette.Hawkins@enron.com; Bill.Moore@enron.com;
> cristinah@elektro.com.br; Carlos.Gustavo.Azevedo@enron.com;
> Carmen.Perez@enron.com; Carolyn.Cooney@enron.com; Charles.Yeung@enron.com;
> Chauncey.Hood@enron.com; Chris.Long@enron.com;
> Christi.L.Nicolay@enron.com; Cynthia.Sandherr@enron.com;
> Damon.Harvey@enron.com; Dan.Staines@enron.com;
> Daniel.Allegretti@enron.com; Dave.Mangskau@enron.com;
> Donald.Lassere@enron.com; Donna.Fulton@enron.com; Eidy.Catala@enron.com;
> Elizabeth.Linnell@enron.com; Frank.Rishe@enron.com;
> Geriann.Warner@enron.com; Ginger.Dernehl@enron.com;
> Gisele.S.Braz@enron.com; Gloria.Ogenyi@enron.com;
> Guillermo.Canovas@enron.com; Harry.Kingerski@enron.com;
> Howard.Fromer@enron.com; James.D.Steffes@enron.com;
> Janine.Migden@enron.com; Javier.Pantoja@enron.com;
> Jean.R.Dressler@enron.com; Jean.Ryall@enron.com; Jeff.Brown@enron.com;
> Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com; Jeffrey.Keeler@enron.com; Joao.Paixao@enron.com;
> Joe.Allen@enron.com; Joe.Connor@enron.com; Joe.Hartsoe@enron.com;
> Joe.Hillings@enron.com; Jose.Bestard@enron.com; Joseph.Alamo@enron.com;
> Kathleen.Sullivan@enron.com; Kerry.Stroup@enron.com;
> Kikumi.Kishigami@enron.com; Kirsten.Bellas@enron.com;
> Lara.Leibman@enron.com; Laurie.Knight@enron.com; Leslie.Lawner@enron.com;
> Linda.J.Noske@enron.com; Linda.Robertson@enron.com;
> Lindsay.Meade@enron.com; Lisa.Yoho@enron.com; Lora.Sullivan@enron.com;
> Luiz.Maurer@enron.com; Lysa.Akin@enron.com; Marchris.Robinson@enron.com;
> Marcia.A.Linton@enron.com; Marcie.Milner@enron.com; Mary.Hain@enron.com;
> Maureen.McVicker@enron.com; Melinda.Pharms@enron.com;
> Michelle.Belzak@enron.com; Mona.L.Petrochko@enron.com;
> Nancy.Hetrick@enron.com; Patrick.Keene@enron.com; Ray.Alvarez@enron.com;
> Rebecca.W.Cantrell@enron.com; Ricardo.Charvel@enron.com;
> Richard.Ingersoll@enron.com; Richard.Shapiro@enron.com;
> Robert.Frank@enron.com; Robert.Hemstock@enron.com;
> Robert.Neustaedter@enron.com; Robin.Kittel@enron.com;
> Ron.McNamara@enron.com; rboston@enron.com; Rubena.Buerger@enron.com;
> Sandra.McCubbin@enron.com; Sarah.Novosel@enron.com;
> Scott.Bolton@enron.com; Sergio.Assad@enron.com; Stella.Chan@enron.com;
> Stephen.D.Burns@enron.com; Steve.Montovano@enron.com;
> Steve.Walton@enron.com; Steven.J.Kean@enron.com; Sue.Nord@enron.com;
> Susan.J.Mara@enron.com; Susan.M.Landwehr@enron.com;
> Terri.Miller@enron.com; Thane.Twiggs@enron.com; Tom.Briggs@enron.com;
> Tom.Chapman@enron.com; Tom.Delaney@enron.com; Tom.Hoatson@enron.com;
> Tracy.Cooper@enron.com; Valeria.Lima@enron.com; Vinio.Floris@enron.com;
> Xi.Xi@enron.com; Steven.J.Kean@enron.com; Jeffrey.Keeler@enron.com;
> Christi.L.Nicolay@enron.com; Sarah.Novosel@enron.com;
> Robert.Frank@enron.com; Lara.Leibman@enron.com; Gloria.Ogenyi@enron.com;
> Richard.Shapiro@enron.com; Leslie.Lawner@enron.com;
> Paul.Kaufman@enron.com; Aleck.Dadson@enron.com;
> Daniel.Allegretti@enron.com; Howard.Fromer@enron.com;
> Joe.Hartsoe@enron.com; rboston@enron.com; Janine.Migden@enron.com;
> Christie.Patrick@enron.com; Jane.Wilson@enron.com;
> Rhonda.L.Denton@enron.com; kmagruder@newpower.com; scovino@newpower.com;
> Rebecca.Carter@enron.com; Shelley.Corman@enron.com;
> Janet.Butler@enron.com; Kevin.M.Presto@enron.com; Brad.Richter@enron.com;
> Greg.Piper@enron.com; Kevin.McGowan@enron.com; Kim.Ward@enron.com;
> Leslie.Reeves@enron.com
> Subject:  I'm Leaving Enron
>
> I am going to be the Senior Regulatory Counsel at ISO New England starting
> on April 9, 2001.   My last day in the Portland area will be March 31,
> 2001.  I enjoyed working with you and wish you the best of everything.  My
> new address will be:
>
> Mary Hain
> Senior Regulatory Counsel
> ISO New England Inc.
> One Sullivan Road
> Holyoke, MA  01040-2841
> (413) 535-4000
> mhain@ISO-NE.com
>


NorskeCanada announced today plans for additional curtailment for the first quarter of 2002 at its B.C. paper operations, as weak economic conditions have reduced demand for the company's products.  Norske is planning to shutdown 2 paper machines until market conditions improve. No. 3 paper machine at Port Alberni and No. 1 paper machine at Elk Falls are currently scheduled for shutdown in the 1Q02. A third paper machine, No. 1 at Crofton, is also planned for shutdown during the month of January.  This translates into about 34,000 MT for 1Q02 at Elk Falls (since Port Alberni produces mostly directory) and about 12,000 MT at the Crofton mill for January.  Given the uncertain economic climate, the company will review curtailment plans monthly so it can be quick to respond to any upturn in market conditions. Please find the Downtime database for 2002 attached below.

Ayesha


<<X18138.DOC>>

FYI here is what Rod discussed at his meeting.

 - X18138.DOC


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES on 03/31/2000
12:07 PM ---------------------------

Xi Xi
03/29/2000 08:00 PM
To: Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Donald Lassere/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: WTO Impact on the Privatization & Liberalization of the Global
telecommunication markets

Rick,

Here are some articles which examine the ineffectiveness of WTO agreement
(1997) on the opening up of the telecommunication markets around the world.
One of the major forthcoming issues is Japan's risk of tbeing aken to the WTO
over its high access costs in the Japanese domestic market.
Both the US and EU have been urging the Japanese to bring down the cost or
face the consequences.  We are still waiting to see what will happen in
Brussels? Whether the WTO have enough power to enforce its regulations would
be a major factor in determining the its prowess in the future.

best regards,
xi xi


At the legal committee mtg, Gary Dahlke made presentations about the
captioned issues.  I have forwarded these documents to Christian,  Elizabeth
Sager, and Vicky Sharp for their review.


I received an invoice from Corestaff for the day that Christina worked.  Do I need to do something with the invoice, or will she be paid automatically?


Hello Scooter,

Hope you had fun on your three dates this weekend!!!  (you slut!)

You know I am jealous.  Peggy says not to spread yourself too thin!!!!

You would not believe how cheap it is here.  Today at the musuem I had a
sandwich, snickers and a cafe latte for $1.50!!!  A three course dinner last
night cost $3.00.

The bad news is that your gift cost $0.20!!  (ha, ha)  I really haven't bought
it yet.

Take Care,

Miss you,

Julie  :-)