----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 05/04/2001 09:45 AM -----

	Pam Ross <pross@cmta.net>
	05/02/2001 05:23 PM
	Please respond to pross

		 To: undisclosed-recipients:;
		 cc:
		 Subject: CMTA TAX/GR & Generators: Windfall Profits tax Thurs. meeting
changed to  Friday

TO:          Kassandra Gough--Calpine
                Chris Micheli--Carpenter Snodgrass
                Carolyn Baker--Duke Energy
                Anne Kelly--Duke Energy
                David Parquet--Enron
                Jeff Dasovitch--Enron
                Tom Allen--Mirant
                John Stout--Reliant Energy
                Scott Sadler--Reliant Energy
                Fred Pownal--Kahl/Pownall Advocates
                Fred Main--California Chamber of Commerce
                Greg Turner--Cal Tax
                Katie Kaplan--IEP
                Matt Sutton--AEA
                CMTA Energy Committee
                CMTA Tax Committee
                CMTA Government Relations Committee

FROM:   Carrie-Lee Coke/Pam Ross

RE:         Friday, May 4 meeting at 1:30 pm in the CMTA conference room
to discuss Windfall Profits Tax bills

Due to a scheduling conflict, we are changing our Thursday, 2:00 pm
meeting to Friday, May 4 at 1:30 pm.

As most of you are aware, CMTA is opposing legislation designed to
impose a Windfall Profits Tax on electricity generator
companies.  The bills are SBX1 1 (Soto) and ABX1 128 (Corbett).  Please
note that the Soto bill pertains to co-generators as
well as entities exclusively in the power business.  That means that
many of you would be directly effected.  The other primary
basis for opposition is that the bills would inhibit electrical supply.
Please also note that, to the extent that SBX1 1 (Soto) were
operative, it would impose the "windfall cost" on business taxpayers who
would fund the credit given to personal income tax
taxpayers.

You are invited to our lobbying strategy meeting which will be here at
CMTA's offices at 980 9th Street, Suite 2200
on Friday, May 4 at 1:30 pm.  Please RSVP to Pam Ross at 916-498-3320 or
pross@cmta.net.

There is a call in number as follows:
Access number:  1-888-727-8686
Conference ID:   900 1325#
TO:          Kassandra Gough--Calpine
                Chris Micheli--Carpenter Snodgrass
                Carolyn Baker--Duke Energy
                Anne Kelly--Duke Energy
                David Parquet--Enron
                Jeff Dasovitch--Enron
                Tom Allen--Mirant
                John Stout--Reliant Energy
                Scott Sadler--Reliant Energy
                Fred Pownal--Kahl/Pownall Advocates
                Fred Main--California Chamber of Commerce
                Greg Turner--Cal Tax
                Katie Kaplan--IEP
                Matt Sutton--AEA
                CMTA Energy Committee
                CMTA Tax Committee
                CMTA Government Relations Committee
FROM:   Carrie-Lee Coke/Pam Ross
RE:         Friday, May 4 meeting at 1:30 pm in the CMTA conference room to
discuss Windfall Profits Tax bills
Due to a scheduling conflict, we are changing our Thursday, 2:00 pm meeting
to Friday, May 4 at 1:30 pm.
As most of you are aware, CMTA is opposing legislation designed to impose a
Windfall Profits Tax on electricity generator
companies.  The bills are SBX1 1 (Soto) and ABX1 128 (Corbett).  Please note
that the Soto bill pertains to co-generators as
well as entities exclusively in the power business.  That means that many of
you would be directly effected.  The other primary
basis for opposition is that the bills would inhibit electrical supply.
Please also note that, to the extent that SBX1 1 (Soto) were
operative, it would impose the "windfall cost" on business taxpayers who
would fund the credit given to personal income tax
taxpayers.
You are invited to our lobbying strategy meeting which will be here at CMTA's
offices at 980 9th Street, Suite 2200
on Friday, May 4 at 1:30 pm.  Please RSVP to Pam Ross at 916-498-3320 or
pross@cmta.net.
There is a call in number as follows:
Access number:  1-888-727-8686
Conference ID:   900 1325#


The EES/EWS Process Meeting will now be held EVERY THURSDAY at 3:00.  We have also changed the location since we were bumped the last two meeting 	dates.  	The NEW  LOCATION is EB2868.


FOLLOW ME TO FINANCIAL FREEDOM!!

I Am looking for people with good work ethics and extrordinary desire to earn at least $10,000 per month working from home!

NO SPECIAL SKILLS OR EXPERIENCE REQUIRED. We will give you all the training and personal support you will need to ensure your success!

This LEGITIMATE HOME-BASED INCOME OPPORTUNITY can put you back in control of your time, your finances, and your life!

If you've tried other opportunities in the past that have failed to live up their promises, THIS IS DIFFERENT THEN ANYTHING ELSE YOU'VE SEEN!

THIS IS NOT A GET RICH QUICK SCHEME!

YOUR FINANCIAL PAST DOES NOT HAVE TO BE YOUR FINANCIAL FUTURE!

CALL ONLY IF YOU ARE SERIOUS!

1-800-533-9351 (Free, 2 minute message)

DO NOT RESPOND BY EMAIL AND DON'T GO TO SLEEP WITHOUT LISTENING TO THIS!

" The moment you commit an quit holding back, all sorts of unforseen incidents, meetings and material assistance will
rise up to help you. The simple act of commitment is a powerful magnet for help." - Napoleon Hill

To be REMOVED from this list, simply click reply and submit.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Bianchi, Rita
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 5:37 PM
To:	Gracey, Rosemary; Zadow, Raetta
Cc:	Kirk, Steve; Winckowski, Michele; Darveaux, Mary; Williams, John
Subject:	Low Load GRI changes for 2002

Rosemary - Please forward to everyone in Marketing'
Raetta - Please forward to everyone in Gas Logistics.

The GRI rates will change, effective January 1,2002
Commodity changes from .0070 to .0055
High Load Reservation GRI (default) changes from .090 to .066
Low Load Reservation GRI changes from .0550 to .0407
Small Customer GRI (GS-T contracts) changes from .0110 to .0088

Marketers:
As the attached letter explains, I have redetermined which shippers are considered "Low Load" for the coming year.
The changes from Low to High or High to Low are listed in the letter.  A few customers flip-flop from year to year.  If any of your customers are affected, please advise them before January Reservation invoices go out (February 1, 2002).  NNG files a tariff change for the new rates, but does not file or mail out any notices about changes in a shipper's high/low load status.

John Williams/Gas Logistics - FYI.  The spreadsheet lists legal entities that are in the High Load or Low Load categories for 2002.
If a shipper is not listed, then it will default to the High Load GRI rate.

Call if you have questions.


Kim, who do you think you are fooling?  A drink or two?  Really?!?!  I think
I have heard that one from you before.  I don't even say shit like that
anymore because when I say shit like that I end up partying harder than I
would have had I just kept my mouth shut.  But in respect for your new job we
will make sure you are home and tucked in bed early!  :)  See ya soon!


Yeah you're gonna have to explain that one...I'm confused.  I didn't go last
year so I don't know how they check everyone at the door.

I know what you meant in your earlier email.  That was kind of strange.
Hopefully I'll get out of here at a decent time.  And if I can get my
accomplishments done during the day today that would be fabulous.  Maybe I
could even come watch you play soccer.   But all that hinges on my
accomplishments.  And of course since I put it off until today, we violated
every limit we have this morning!  Well we didn't violate p&l, just VAR and
positions.  So I'm sure I'll spend most of the day answering questions.

See you at lunch.
Robin

Gabriel Monroy
12/05/2000 07:51 AM
To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: x-mas party

I have a question. Do you think it is possible to RSVP for the X-mas Party -
you and your invitee- then your invitee shows up without you? Do you think
they'll let him/her get in?

I'll explain what I am trying to do at lunch or Brown Bag.

Gabriel


Thoughts?
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 01/22/2001
05:29 PM ---------------------------

Dan Leff@EES
01/22/2001 04:12 PM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: California Integrated Supply / Demand Management Program

Rick / Steve -

Please check this out and provide some comments.

It currently does not contain a "market price".  That is being assembled now.

Please also let me know when you would like to get this to the CA Governor's
office.

Thank you - Dan


Chris,

I assumed we were scaping the "Inventory Chagne" point for PGE, but it doesn't look like any data is in the database.  Can you check on this.  It's the last row of the larger tables on the webpage.  The location name I believe is Inventory Chang.  If it's not being scaped, let's get it started.

Mat


Attached per your request on Steve's behalf is my "Year 2000
Accomplishments".  This list is of highlights, and is not intended to be
exhaustive.  Let me know if you need more.   thansk  mcs

All other addressees, I copy you for your information.


Jeff:
I'm checking into this.  I don't think that we need to amend the ISDA Master
because of the language that we put in our confirms, but I will get back to
you on this shortly.
Carol


Brad Holmes
Steve January
Lynn Blair
Mike Bryant
Donna Scott (vac)
Sheila Nacey (vac)
Rick Dietz
Lindy Donoho
Mark McConnell
Michelle Lokay
Paul E Y'Barbo
TK Lohman (vac)
Kevin Hyatt

* Individuals noted will be on vacation -- but you should probably send an invite anyway.


The attached memo summarizes the status of the HPL transaction.  Please call
me with any questions.

Regards,
Brian


Andy:  The following names come to mind:

Jere Overdyke (no longer with Enron)

Frank Stabler (M. D. Caribbean group 646-7017) I think Frank is still here

Rick Carson (VP Risk Mgmt. 853-3905

Let me know if there is anything further that I can do.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Currently we still have 289 active (meaning not terminated) unassigned CES
contracts. As far as those with transactions, only 74 of the 289 have
'active' deals. Currently, or as I understand the situation, Porter & Hedges
(CES's legal counsel for CES Wholesale) is still driving the consent process
for CES, we are not in the driver's seat.
 An additional note; many of the outstanding consents are with Appalachian
producers who may never actually execute a consent based on the
characteristics of the 'customer'.
As far as any future steps that Enron may chose to execute; I am prepared to
help in anyway I can.

Cyndie

To: Cyndie Balfour-Flanagan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: CES

The list below that Cyndie prepared contains approximately 300 contracts that
have not been assigned. Can we verify that these are all contracts that are
active?  Also, who in our organization is continuing to pursue these
assignments?  Columbia would like to reduce the guaranty (I have agreed to a
reduction due to Risk's analysis that no MTM exposure exists, only delivery
which I have asked Bryce Baxter to quantify); however, further reductions are
dependent on Bryce being able to determine the receivable risk assosciated
with the unassigned, active contracts.

Thanks for your help,
Tanya
---------------------- Forwarded by Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT on 12/13/2000 11:50
AM ---------------------------

Jeffrey C Gossett
12/05/2000 06:32 PM
To: Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: CES

The deals that we have in our system are not inclusive of gas daily daily
deals or deals at index.  These deals are all in our physical sytems but are
not at a fixed price,  therefore have no forward mark to market value.  These
are the deals that are not evergreen deals.

From:  Tanya Rohauer
   12/05/2000 06:23 PM

To: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: CES

I am somewhat unclear as to how we got from the 300 or so contracts that have
not been assigned per Cyndie's list below to 3?  Does that mean all the other
contracts have rolled off? Guadalupe Power Partners LP looks like one that
has not rolled off that was a huge term sale with considerable delivery
risk.  Are all of the deals on Cyndie's list index deals? Let's chat tomorrow.

Thanks,
Tanya

Jeffrey C Gossett
12/05/2000 05:49 PM
To: Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: CES

Let me know what else I can do.

Thanks,

Jeff
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT on 12/05/2000
05:48 PM ---------------------------

Cyndie Balfour-Flanagan@ENRON
12/04/2000 09:56 AM
To: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Linda S Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: CES

Attached is a spreadsheet which tracks the CES non-assigned contracts. This
spreadsheet is current as of 12/04/00. I have also attached a 10/01/00 deal
extract showing all deals in Sitara that still carried the CES prefix (which
is used to denote non-assigned deals), this report was originally pulled from
Sitara for Tanya Rohauer. Please call me at 713.853.1443 if I can be of any
further assistance.

Cyndie Balfour-Flanagan
ENA - Global Contracts

CES Transactions (Deal Extract) 10/1/00 - forward
(Please note, there are several transactions for which consent has not been
received that are flagged as evergreen in Sitara and as such represent a
"rolling" CES transaction and as such exposure until consent for assignment
is received or until the transaction/contract is terminated. I have
highlighted these transaction in green.)


-----Original Message-----
From: djcustomclips@djinteractive.com
[mailto:djcustomclips@djinteractive.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 2:34 PM
To: 168842@mailman.enron.com
Subject: Rahil Jafry: ADVISORY/Gov. Gray Davis to Speak At Milken
Institute `State of State ...

ADVISORY/Gov. Gray Davis to Speak At Milken Institute `State of State
Conference'; Impact of Sept. 11 On California Economy to be Underlying
Topic of Event

10/23/2001
Business Wire
(Copyright (c) 2001, Business Wire)

  --(BUSINESS WIRE)--

WHAT: Milken Institute 2001 California State of the State Conference
WHEN: Tuesday, Nov. 6, 2001, 8 a.m. - 6:15 p.m.
WHERE: Fairmont Miramar Hotel, 101 Wilshire Blvd., Santa Monica,
       Calif.
WHO: Speakers include:
--   Gray Davis, Governor of California (special presentation)
--   Philip Angelides, California State Treasurer (keynote speaker)
--   Jerry Brown, Mayor, City of Oakland
--   Willie Brown, Mayor, City of San Francisco
--   Stephen E. Frank, Chairman, President and CEO, Southern
     California Edison
--   Richard J. Hayes, Senior Investment Officer, CalPERS.
--   Loretta Lynch, President, California Public Utilities
     Commission
--   Mike Medavoy, Chairman and CEO, Phoenix Pictures
--   Alex Padilla, President, Los Angeles City Council
--   Jeff Skilling, former CEO, Enron Corporation
SESSIONS COVER:
--   The cause, possible solutions and economic impact of the state's
     ongoing electricity dilemma
--   How the state can maintain its competitive edge in the
     entertainment industry
--   The future of high-speed, Internet technology
--   The opportunities and challenges posed by California's growing
     diversity
--   How to finance needed infrastructure, new companies, housing and
     other backbones of the state's economy
--   A special Q&A with Institute scholars and the audience moderated
     by Chairman Michael Milken.

  In addition, the impact of the events of September 11 on California's
economy will be a major underlying topic of the conference. And the Institute
will release its annual New Economy Index.
  INFORMATION: Registration for all sessions, lunch and a briefing book is
only $495. For complete information about the program, speakers and
registration, visit the Institute's Web site at www.milkeninstitute.org, or
contact the Events Department at 310/998-2605.

  Note to media: Accredited media wishing to attend the State of the State
Conference (at no charge) must register for the event. Please contact Skip
Rimer, Director of Communications, at 310/998-2654, or by e-mail at
srimer@milkeninstitute.org.

CONTACT: Milken Institute
             Skip Rimer, 310/998-2654 (Director of Communications)
             e-mail: srimer@milkeninstitute.org

13:42 EDT   OCTOBER 23, 2001

Folder Name: Rahil Jafry
Relevance Score on Scale of 100: 84

______________________________________________________________________

To review or revise your folder, visit http://www.djinteractive.com or contact Dow Jones Customer Service by e-mail at custom.news@bis.dowjones.com or by phone at 800-369-7466. (Outside the U.S. and Canada, call 609-452-1511 or contact your local sales representative.)
______________________________________________________________________

Copyright (c) 2001 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Chen, Hai
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 8:55 AM
To:	Black, Tamara Jae
Subject:	Options Market Update
Importance:	High

T.J.,

Please forward the attached Option Market Update to traders and mid-marketers.  Thanks!

Hai


Didn't see you on this list and thought you or Stacey/Ami would want to know.
---------------------- Forwarded by Lauri A Allen/HOU/ECT on 03/21/2000 01:47
PM ---------------------------

Mary M Smith
03/21/2000 01:38 PM
To: Lisa Hesse/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Lauri A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: FIRST DELIVERIES - CICO OIL & GAS CO., AND UNION GAS CORP.

FYI, now that these meters are now flowing, please ensure that our rate
assumptions are still applicable.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary M Smith/HOU/ECT on 03/21/2000 01:35
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Esther Buckley                           03/21/2000 01:27 PM

To: Molly L Carriere/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clem Cernosek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna
Consemiu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lisa Hesse/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nathan L Hlavaty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wayne E
Lightfoot/HOU/ECT@ECT, James McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary M Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Steve Schneider/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Walters/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Wardle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jill T Zivley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Jo Johnson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael W Morris/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Cheryl Jones/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Reid Hansen/GCO/Enron@Enron, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, O'Neal D Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Gary Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary A Hanks/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donald P
Reinhardt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vance L Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda F
Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian
M Riley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Austin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia
Hakemack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dawn C Kenne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Csikos/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kristen J Hanson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Heidi Withers/HOU/ECT@ECT, J R
Fosdick/GCO/Enron@Enron, Carlos J Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie
Gomes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom Acton/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Robert Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FIRST DELIVERIES - CICO OIL & GAS CO., AND UNION GAS CORP.

See attached files


Sorry, I had an incorrect address.  Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 12/21/2000 11:01 AM -----

	Sara Shackleton
	12/21/2000 08:49 AM

		 To: jdeason@chbh.com, bert.dunn@eweb.eugene.or.us, Dick.Varner@eweb.or.us
		 cc: Holli Krebs/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: EWEB Schedule to the Master Agreement

Jim:

Attached is a revised Schedule.  We have accepted most of your changes.  I
believe that the outstanding issues include:

1.  Please note the revised Threshold which we previously discussed.
2.  We accepted Portland as a forum for arbitration.
3.  We need to discuss your invoicing procedure.
4.  We are waiting to comment back on the revised reps pending receipt of the
CSA and legal opinion.
5.  We have added some language to the recording provision to acknowledge
internal recording destruction policies.
6.  We have not revised the Reference Market-maker provision.  Have you had a
chance to consider my email of 12/19/00?

Please let us know when we will receive the remaining documentation so that
we can finalize our negotiations.

Regards.  Sara


We may not give guest access to see credit derivatives products to any
customer without approval from legal.

I will send lists of customers for whom I have received the approval in
advance - if any request for guest access specifically to see credit
derivatives is received, please chack with:

US  Mark Taylor
Europe Edmund Cooper.

Please note that the Credit derivatives guest customer currently set up is
for internal users.

NO CREDIT DERIVATIVES PROFILES OF ANY SORT MAY BE ISSUED TO CUSTOMERS FROM
THE  FOLLOWING JURISDICTIONS:

CANADA
FRANCE
SPAIN
ITALY
IRELAND
NETHERLANDS

rgds

M

ps - Mark/ Edmund,

pse let me know if you have alternates.


On Tuesday, May 1 we will begin the migration from Lotus Notes to Microsoft
Outlook.  Your existing emails and folders within Lotus Notes will be
transferred to Outlook without the loss of any data.

The attached spreadsheet indicates migration date by employee. Training for
Outlook will be available Wednesday through Friday.  Currently, training
information is not available, however, we will try to have this information
to the floor on Monday. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact
Dave Steiner at ext. 3701.


I will be able to interview at either time.  I selected the late time on the
email, but wanted to respond to make sure you received it.

DG
---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 02/09/2001
10:45 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Andrea Richards @ ENRON                           02/09/2001 10:35 AM

To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jana Giovannini/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Analyst Interviews Needed - 2/15/01

Darron, David, please respond to Jana in regards to the times that you will
be available to interview candidates.
---------------------- Forwarded by Andrea Richards/NA/Enron on 02/09/2001
10:41 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Jana Giovannini @ ECT                           01/25/2001 01:42 PM

To: John Cobb/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Bob Chandler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, James
Saunders/Houston/Eott@Eott, Jennifer Lev/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Lisa
Sutton/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Susan Helton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Georgeanne
Hodges/HOU/ECT@ECT, Faith Killen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Whiting/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Sayed Khoja/NA/Enron, Mary Lynne Ruffer/HOU/EES@EES, Jody Pierce/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Thomas Myers/HOU/ECT
cc: Shelly Butler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea Richards/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Analyst Interviews Needed - 2/15/01

All,

The Analyst and Associate Programs recognize we have many Analyst needs that
need to be addressed immediately.  While we anticipate many new Analysts
joining Enron this summer (late May) and fulltime (August) we felt it
necessary to address some of the immediate needs with an Off-Cycle Recruiting
event.  We are planning this event for Thursday, February 15 and are inviting
approximately 30 candidates to be interviewed.  I am asking that you forward
this note to any potential interviewers (Managers or above).  We will conduct
first round interviews in the morning and the second round interviews in the
afternoon.  We need for interviewers to commit either to the morning
(9am-12pm) or afternoon (2pm-5pm) complete session.  Please submit your
response using the buttons below and update your calendar for this date.  If
you are currently on the new Outlook program, you may not be able to use the
buttons below.  In that instance, please contact me at x39233 to volunteer.

In addition, we have a need within one of Enron's business units for
accounting majors.  We will be bringing several people in to interview with
accounting backgrounds.  We will then make sure that the schedule will be set
so you would interview these specific candidates.  We would greatly
appreciate your assistance in this effort.  Thanks in advance for your
cooperation.

Thank you,
Jana


yes

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Juvane, Danilo
Sent:	Tuesday, August 28, 2001 9:42 AM
To:	Causholli, Monika
Subject:	RE: European spot pulp prices see improvement

do you need help with anything right now?


where do we stand now?  last i heard was an e-mail from oxley (which is on lotus notes and not accessible anymore) which said that we don't think that we are going to get there, but hold on for a few more days while we finalize our decision and craft a really nice decline speech.  it's been a few weeks now, and i am checking status.  do you still want to offer him the initial contract?  i doubt he'd take it but i need to know.  what would you change with his proposal that would be acceptable?  i think that mike has taken this negotiation seriously and deserves a timely resolution.


Following our announcement of an additional of $1 billion credit line, Standard & Poor's (S&P) today downgraded Enron's long-term credit rating one notch from BBB+ to BBB and short-term rating from A2 to A3.  We expected this, because it is not unusual to be downgraded after using assets to secure credit.  This is still above investment grade.

The ratings of our pipelines Northern Natural Gas and Transwestern have also been lowered from A- to BBB.  In S&P's words, "Their ratings [are now] in line with those of the parent company to reflect S&P's view that Enron's pipeline assets have become more strategic to the company."

S&P also said, "[We continue] to believe that Enron's liquidity position is adequate to see the company through the current period of uncertainty, and that the company is working to provide itself with an even greater liquidity cushion through additional bank lines and pending asset sales."

As I've said before, building on our liquidity position through additional credit lines maintains our counterparties' confidence and strengthens our core businesses.

It's important for you to know that our gas and power numbers - which account for more than 95 percent of our trading activity - indicate that our customer base is not withdrawing, closing out positions, or reducing transaction levels as a result of credit concerns.  In fact, EnronOnline trading volumes are currently experiencing above-normal activity.

We will continue to update you as new developments arise.  Thank you.


Rick / Rick / Sally

I attach the  'executive' summary of a note sent to the office of the chair
last week detailing current operational difficulties with the Metals
Merchanting business. Subsequently an 'all hands' meeting was called to
discuss the operational issues and the business imperatives of
Off Balance Sheet Facility ("OBSF") renegotiation
Minimising working captial
SAP implementation
The notes of that meeting are also attached at the bottom of this email

Should you require any further information please call, otherwise I will
forward updates as they are completed.

Regards

Mike

ISSUE

The Physical metals business implemented an Off Balance Sheet Structure
(OBSF) pre year-end to meet Enron requirements for gearing ratios.

Whilst this does not present undue problems for LME warrants, these being
bearer documents, it does present an issue when physical metal, the value of
which depends upon brand and location, is placed into the facility. Given the
hard deadline of year-end the operational support of this process initially
took place on spreadsheets.

The impact of the OBSF on the operational side of the physical business
should not be underestimated. The process of moving material off and on
balance sheet places considerable strain from trading through to settlements,
particularly when there is an absence of necessary control functionality in
the AS400. With the specified functionality it is believed that all
operational and trading issues arising from OBSF can be managed
satisfactorily.

The core functionality, which was due prior to the year-end, was released
during January but was subsequently found to have introduced +bugs, to the
integrated business control processes. Whilst an improvement on having no
OBSF functionality, the +bugs, have had an increasingly negative effect on
the control environment, compounded by the fact that IT can not provide a
guaranteed delivery for the +bug, fixes and non core ,reporting,
functionality.

This has given rise to the following concerns:

? There are insufficient experienced resources to fully reconcile stock at a
brand & location level to coordination records (the global position is
reconciled however).
? It is not possible to substantiate the DPR for EM&CL as:
? a) P&L on spread moves from Cash to 3 months positions (and related cash to
3 months provisions) can not be produced by the system and must be estimated,
and
? b) System bugs have created uncertainties over trial balance values.

These concerns are compounded by the following:

? The most experienced AS400 IT developer for the EM&CL business has
resigned. He is currently working his 6 months notice which will expire in
July 2001.
? The most experienced AS400 IT developer on the EML side of the business has
also resigned. He left in January 2001.
? There is no documentation for the AS400. It is therefore difficult for
experienced AS400 programmers to get upto speed on the system.

Conclusion

It is essential that we do not become hostages to the development of the
AS400 system and the renegotiation of the OBSF facility with Barclays. The
current situation has arisen due to non-delivery of IT developments and tight
timescales on the finalisation of the OBSF facility.

To meet Q1 end requirements (i.e. full production of the DPR and stock
reconciliation), IT and the OBSF deal team must make concrete commitments on
delivery timeline. The business will not be able to commit to successful
implementation of the facility and resubstantiation of the Trial Balance
without these

---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Jordan/LON/ECT on 26/02/2001 16:18
---------------------------

Mike Jordan
26/02/2001 16:18
To: Michael R Brown/LON/ECT@ECT, Fernley Dyson/LON/ECT@ECT, Joe
Gold/LON/ECT@ECT, Michael Farmer/EU/Enron@ENRON, Michael J
Hutchinson/EU/Enron@Enron, Anne Edgley/LON/ECT@ECT, Melissa
Allen/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Pickering/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Chivers/LON/ECT@ECT,
Robert Campbell/LON/ECT@ECT, Andrew Cornfield/LON/ECT@ECT, Howard
Carter/EU/Enron@Enron, Bill Appleby/LON/ECT@ECT, David P Tregar/EU/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Metals - Imminent Actions - notes of meeting 23 rd Feb

To all

I seek to clarify the actions discussed at Friday's meeting and to emphasise
the critical importance of getting all the below completed as quickly as
possible to meet our Q1 requirements ( revenue targets, balance sheet
targets, interest expense minimisation etc ). The proposed tactical plan that
was circulated is not attached as it has already been superceded!

There was agreement on several broad areas of immediate focus with specific
objectives and accountabilities -

IT resourcing

Communicate priority to HR about the importance of obtaining skilled AS400
programmers - for tactical short term and for long term work - action MP
Resourcing for long term AS400 'off-load' initiative to be completed asap -
action MP
Merchanting resource focus to be on bug fixes impacting MO ability to update
OBSF options in AS400 and for traffic to update recent location movements of
stock in OBSF - action RC ( deadline 1 week )
Completion of inception document for full OBSF inventory control
functionality - action RC ( deadline 1 week )
Split of resources for SAP interface - only EML SAP implementation is now
planned for 1/4/01 - action RC to confirm resource reallocation 27/01
Immediate improvement in IT Operations support required ( including
completion of transfer of support responsibility from Dev. to Ops. ) - action
MP

Operational Support

MO risk/trade accounting resources to focus on rebooking all remaining
transactions on OBSF inventory spreadsheet - action HC ( deadline asap )
Validation of system generated p&l to commence following the above - action
HC ( deadline asap )
Timetable for catch up of traffic OBSF location movements to be completed
with John Lunzer 27/02 - action HC
Determine action for improvement in delivering metal to facility ( initial
assumption for recent working capital increase was that we had operationally
slowed down in placing qualifying material into facility ) - action HC / AC
(deadline asap)

Working Capital

Detailed daily analysis of working capital movements to be produced and
formatted in style of sources and uses of funds   ( including facility
headroom ) - action AC ( deadline asap )
Forward estimate of working capital to be produced for rest of quarter and
used for estimation of full interest expense - action AC, MJ & MA ( deadline
asap )
Analysis for trade receivables ( and reasons for recent increase ) and
investigation of possible factoring - AC/MJ and AE/BA ( deadline asap )
Determining extent to which pricing signals for working capital usage can be
communicated to traders, traffic and operations - action JG, MJ ( contingent
on above )

OBSF negotiation

Documentation of current negotiation issues ( including AA sign-off issues )
to be drafted and circulated with clear accountabilities  - action MA/DT/BA
(deadline 26/3)
Operational impact of agreement to be considered in parallel to negotiation -
action HC/AC/BA

LME relationship

Consider utilising a US subsidiary to book OBSF transactions to negate LME
reviewing facility as part of regulatory regime - action MA/FD
Monitoring notice of investigation issued by LME  -action FD/DT


Constellation Energy Group, Inc. has added a News Release to its Investor Relations web site.  For a complete listing of our News Releases visit:  http://investor.constellationenergy.com/ireye/ir_site.zhtml?ticker=ceg&script=40 0    Title:  Nashville Selects Constellation Energy Source for New District Energy System Date:  2/4/2002

This email alert service uses proprietary JoinMail list management software provided by CCBN. To learn more about JoinMail, visit the CCBN Website @: www.ccbn.com

To unsubscribe from this JoinMail list, please click on the link below and send a blank reply:   U-B2.9064.110607.paulzQ4dzQ4thomaszQ2enronzQ4com@joinmail.ccbn.com


The Environmental Affairs Department is developing a list of ETS natural gas
pipeline facilities where the  condensate throughput exceeds 30,000
gallons/year.  In the coming weeks, the Division Environmental Specialists
will be asking your operating teams for annual condensate throughput at all
facilities.  Please impress upon the teams the importance of collecting and
providing this information as we have committed to a first quarter 2002
deadline to compile the list.  This request is especially critical in areas
prior to processing as the likelihood of the annual condensate throughput to
exceed 30,000 gallons/year increases in those areas.

Please  call me at (402) 398-7716 or email me if you have any questions about
this request.  Thank you for your help!

Ruth Jensen
Manager, Air Programs


request_number:  DS-PP:010
firstname:  Peter
lastname:  Richardson
e-mail:  peter@richardsonandoleary.com
exhibit_wp-02-e-:  JCG-01 and -02
page_numbers:
request_text:  Please disclose and/or produce copies of any and all
communications, from October 16, 2001 to the present, between any BPA
representative and any representative of any other party, concerning any of
the following subjects:

a. The general structure of the Cost Recovery Adjustment Clauses (CRACs)
described in the testimony of the Joint Customers;

b. Any differences between the form of the CRACs described in the testimony
of the Joint Customers and the CRACs contained in BPA's Amended Proposal, or
those contained in BPA's Supplemental Proposal;

c. The detailed mechanics of implementing the CRACs described in the
testimony of the Joint Customers;

d. Revenue effects of the CRACs described in the testimony of the Joint
Customers, any modifications; or

e. Any aspect of the Partial Stipulation and Settlement Agreement and the
Parties' Proposal attached thereto.

For purposes of this Request, "disclose and/or produce" has the meanings
described below. With respect to oral communications, "disclose and/or
produce" means to describe the time, date, approximate duration, and
substantive content of the communication; the identity and organizational
affiliation of the communicating individuals; whether the communication
occurred in person or by telephone; the location of the communication if in
person; the identity of any witnesses to the communications, including all
individuals in the room if the communication occurred by speakerphone; and
whether the communication was made in the presence of or after coordination
with BPA counsel (if so, identify such counsel). For purposes of this
Request, you need not "disclose and/or produce" oral communications that
occurred during meetings noticed in compliance with Rate Case Rule 1010.7(d).

With respect to written communications, the Request includes communications
in any recorded form, whether on paper, electronic (including, without
limitation, e-mails), or whatever form. For such communications, "disclose
and/or produce" means to provide copies of all non-identical versions of any
written communications and to describe with particularity the location where
such communications were found and/or stored, including the identity of the
individual with possession or control of the written communications; to
describe with particularity the circumstances under which they were generated
or referred to; and to fully "disclose and/or produce" any oral
communications made in connection with the written communications consistent
with the preceding paragraph. For purposes of this Request, you need not
produce papers served on all parties to the rate case and made part of the
official file in the rate case.

response_text:  The Public Power Council (PPC) objects to this Data Request
on the grounds that it (i) seeks information that is not relevant; (ii) seeks
information that is privileged; and (iii) seeks information that is unduly
burdensome to produce. Rules of Procedure Governing Rate Hearings, Section
1010.8(b). PPC further objects to this Data Request on the grounds that it is
in improper form as it does not cite to specific testimony or indicate the
specific use to which the information sought will be put. Special Rules of
Practice, WP-02-01. Without waiving the foregoing objections, PPC responds as
follows:

Please see attached.

The following information is from the web server:
1.  Logon: IUSR_GRANITE
2.  Remote Host:  dsl226.usw-1-224.pacifier.com
3.  Remote IP Address:  207.202.224.226
4.  Form URL:
https://secure.bpa.gov/power/secure/psp/ratecase/discovery/wp_02_response.html
5.  Browser Client:  Mozilla/4.76 [en] (Win95; U)


May help on hotel rooms
m
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT on 12/11/2000
04:04 PM ---------------------------

"Jonny Jones" <jjones@jonesenergy.com> on 12/11/2000 09:28:01 AM
To: <Mike.McConnell@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: OU

Mike,

We are not sure when we are going down.  There are rooms available through
O.U.  Go to http://www.ou.edu.  Click University of Oklahoma Official Bowl
Tour information and follow to the hotel information.  Look forward to
seeing you guys and I will keep you posted when we finalzie our plans.

JJ

From: <Mike.McConnell@enron.com>
To: <jjones@jonesenergy.com>
Subject: OU
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 17:30:38 -0600
Message-ID: <OF88D1E503.73F7E534-ON862569AE.008107F9@enron.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000B_01C06354.A8487F20"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
Importance: Normal
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on ENE-MTA01/Enron(Release 5.0.3 (Intl)|21
March 2000) at12/07/2000 05:26:57 PM

---------------------- Forwarded by Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT on 12/07/2000
05:28 PM ---------------------------

 (Embedded
 image moved
 to file:      From:  Mike McConnell
 pic26477.pcx) 12/07/2000 05:28 PM

To:   Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:  OU  (Document link: Mike McConnell)

Pup,

Mark and I are confirmed with flights.  Chris is not coming.  Where are you
staying, any good hotel ideas.  Mark had a room for 1 night by the stadium
but now i think we will fly in on Tues early afternoon and mess around
Miami and therefor  may want to stay closer to the city.  Any thoughts?
When are you guys flying in?

mike

 - pic26477.pcx


I'm sorry, let me know if there is anything I can do.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 3:31 PM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

stomach problems

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 3:30 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

why are you going to the dr?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 3:30 PM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

ok

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 3:26 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

I am not going to be able to get away...Chris is being a jerk

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 3:24 PM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

I am I meant at 3:45

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 3:22 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

I thought you were leaving early?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 3:16 PM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

no but I still have your stuff do you want to come and get it

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 2:20 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:

By any chance have you found my pager in your car?


I haven't had a chance to study this yet, but I'd like you guys to take a
hard look at it and lets meet on Mon or Tues.  I'll  be in Houston ( I
think).  Martha pls set up a meeting with these guys and I'll talk to you
about when I'm going down.  df

Mark Knippa@ECT
02/05/2001 05:28 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, James
Centilli/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron

Subject: Gallup Station - Demand Rebate

Hey Drew,

Sorry that we did not get to meet last week when you were in town.  I have
pulled up some information on the project performance and wanted to share
with the group.  I was very concerned by the comment that the project was on
a rate to cost TW an additional $1.0 million for the year because the demand
avoidance program was not in place.  I do want to confirm that Arnold
Eisenstein at ET&S working on the development of the programming to support
TW's efforts to minimize demand expenses.  It was my understanding during the
development of this project, that TW was targeting a 75% avoidance for an
annual basis.   I offer the following details regarding the actual operation
of the station in 2000.

Peak load for 12,000 hp = 9,621 kw x 3 = 28,864.0 kw per Quarter

Actual Utilization
   3rd Quarter 2000      % of Max  4th Quarter 2000  % of Max
 kw - generation   22,684.8      78.6   17,779       61.6
 kw - transmission 25,421.0      88.1   22,992       79.6

 Target $'s @ 75% 99,142      75.0            73,480      75.0
 Net Actual Rebate  $'s 75,935        78.6                105,181        61.59
  difference            ($23,206)                  $31,702

Overall net for 2000 under Rate 21 appears to reflect that TW has saved
$8,496 above their target rebate of $170,622 (75% avoidance) for the 3rd and
4th quarters.  In addition, ECS has made payment to TW under Rate 19 that
resulted in an additional $118,441 paid to TW.   Note that ECS has proposed
to included the transmission demand in the Rebate process which is not
specifically addressed the Compression Service Agreement.

Currently TW has access to the web site that graphically displays the current
Tri-State generation load as well as several years of month by month
history.  This access was conveyed to TW as soon as the confidentiality
agreement between TW, ECS and Tri-State was executed and delivered to ECS.
At this point, EE&CC (now under ET&S) was notified that the system access was
available to package the load monitoring programming.  As I mentioned above,
that effort is underway.

I will be glad to meet and/or discuss these issues when you are available.  I
will be travelling most of the next (2) weeks but you can reach me via email
or my
cell phone (713) 851-7703.   Based on the information that I was able to pull
together, I just don't see the magnitude of dollars that seems to have TW
concerned.
I would like to discuss at your earliest convenience.

Thanks,
mk


Pipeline Interconnect Participants:

We've got some extra tickets for the Sunday Welcome event.  If some of you
have spouses (no children) you'd like to bring to the Sunday Welcome event,
we can accommodate them on a first come, first serve basis. If you can't
email me by the end of today, call me or leave me a message on my cell phone
- (510) 208-1901.  Tell me how I can contact you so I can call you back.

Sunday Event Information:
1 pm - Lunch at Capp's Corner, 1600 Powell St.
After lunch - Attend a special sold-out event.

Todd Hudson
Information Systems Analyst
Gas System Operations
415.973.1386


---------------------- Forwarded by Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron on 05/31/2000
10:28 AM ---------------------------

"Steve Holmes" <Steve.Holmes@dvn.com> on 05/31/2000 10:13:23 AM
To: <Ami.Chokshi@enron.com>, <Briant.baker@enron.com>,
<Sabra.l.dinari@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: WC 551 Revision and Notice of Force Majeure (Stingray P/L)

Please see the attached change to West Cameron 551 and the notice of Force
Majeure.

Thanks,
Steve

 - WC551reveff053000.xls
 - WC551forcemajeure0530002.doc


The attachments are from David Mitchell

(See attached file: Memorandum to Mark Taylor - September 2001.doc)

(See attached file: Enclosure for Memorandum to Mark Taylor September
2001.doc)

Maria Rutella
(212) 412-7160
==============================================================================
NOTE:  The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you must not read, use or disseminate the information.  Although this email and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect
that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by Cadwalader, Wickersham
& Taft for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use.

==============================================================================

 - Memorandum to Mark Taylor - September 2001.doc
 - Enclosure for Memorandum to Mark Taylor September 2001.doc


We received word from Pablo Gayol who works with Patricia that the two
provisions are not a problem under Argentine law and that these types of
termination events are common.  I am enclosing a minor mark up of the first
paragraph for your review.  Please let me know if you have any questions.

Carol St Clair@ECT
12/11/99 12:40 AM
To: Patricia Cini/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Kabel@Enron, Rodolfo Freyre@Enron, Brent
Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: pla@marvel.com.ar, Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EDEN Confirmation

Enclosed is a new draft of the EDEN Deemed ISDA Confirmation.  Please note
the following:

1. In the opening paragraph, I have drafted language that would basically
"undo" any trade in the event that CAMMESA fails to designate Siderca as a
GUMA on or before the date that is 15 business days from the date of the
Confirmation.  Brent and Patricia, could you please confirm that this
approach works under Argentine law?  We are trying to finalize this early
tomorrow so it would be helpful if you could send back your response to us in
the morning.

2. In the event that Empresa fails to execute an ISDA Master within 15
Business Days, we have the option to terminate the Transaction.  This
language is in Section 2 of Annex B.

Please call me (ext.33989) or Sara Shackleton (ext.35620) with any comments
or questions.  I will be in a meeting from 9-11 tomorrow morning.

Carol


For most of tomorrow (Thursday, 12/7), I will be attending a presentation by
Sparks Companies, our agricultural consultants, to be held in EB2988.  The
meeting starts in the morning and is scheduled to last until 3:30 p.m.

I will check voice messages throughout the day. -- Bob

Robert E. Bruce
Senior Counsel
Enron North America Corp.
T (713) 345-7780
F (713) 646-3393
robert.bruce@enron.com


Yes, I did get in touch with him.  Thanks again for the info.  He is just
being a beach bum...not really doing anything.  Guess I should have figured
that.
PL


Please notify Susan or myself when book request is complete.  Contact me if
you have any questions.

Thank you,
Burton
x5-7197


Effective today my pager number will no longer be active.  I can be reached via cell phone @ 713 412 6208.


Start Date: 4/22/01; HourAhead hour: 4;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042204.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/22/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_ERNIE
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/22/01
  TIE_POINT: SLVRPK_7_SPP
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_ERNIE
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 4 / Preferred:   1.91 / Final:   1.88)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE4
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/22/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


My comments

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	01/03/2001 12:37 PM

		 To: skean@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Comments to Gov's Proposals

I've had to spend a little time negotiating this AM with ENA and EES, but I'm
confident that they'll be OK with this version.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 01/03/2001 12:40 PM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	01/03/2001 12:19 PM

		 To: skean@skytel.com, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Comments to Gov's Proposals

Here they are.  Please review and provide comments quickly.  I'd like to get
this off to Kari ASAP.  Thanks.

Jeff


---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 04/04/2001 10:14 AM
---------------------------

"scott neal" <sneal12@mindspring.com> on 04/04/2001 12:12:18 AM
To: <Scott.Neal@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: bear markets

Unnatural  History

[IMAGE]
If you think  the market can't get much worse, history says you're  wrong.
[IMAGE]

OpenFund  Commentary
[IMAGE]

Indices analyzed in this post:

Dow  Jones Industrials
NASDAQ  Composite
NASDAQ  100
NASDAQ  Volatility
GSTI  Multimedia Networking
GSTI  Semiconductor
GSTI  Software
AMEX  Biotechnology
Russell  2000
Wilshire  TMV
Light  Crude Oil
Gold
30yr  Treasury Bonds
Fed  Funds Futures
[IMAGE]

Live audio of this commentary: [IMAGE]
Live video from our morning call: [IMAGE]

After the last two horrible quarters, many of  us are probably telling
ourselves that it can't get much worse than it's been.  For those of us who
believe that as an unquestioned article of faith, let me  give you a little
history lesson. You'll see that it can get a lot worse  than this.

For our little history lesson we'll focus on the S&P 500, because that
pretty much represents the entire US equity market. Obviously the NASDAQ has
had  it a lot worse -- but that's only a subset of the total market, and it's
fairly  concentrated in a single broad sector: technology. In subsequent
commentaries  the NASDAQ will get its turn in the historical spotlight.

Over the last two quarters  the S&P 500 lost 19.23%. As horrific as that has
been, that actually only  ranks 78th out of the 2409 six-month periods since
1800. Believe it or not,  there have been 77 that were worse.

There were eight six-month  periods in which the S&P 500 lost more than 40%.
There were 18 in which it  lost more than 30%. The very worst single
six-month period was the one ending  May, 1932, in which the S&P 500 lost an
astonishing 52.92%.

Of the 77 six-month periods  worse than the most recent one, 21 were before
1900, and none of them were  during the Civil War. 33 (including the very
worst 4) were in the 1930s, in the  Great Depression that followed in the
wake of the stock market crash of 1929.

The worst six-month period  in the modern era ranks 13th overall. It was the
one ended September, 1974, with  the S&P down 32.39%. 4 others were in the
1970s.

The most recent period worse  than the last six months ranks 73rd. It was the
one ended March, 1988, with the  S&P down 19.56%. That means that in the
1990s there were no six-month  periods worse than the most recent six-month
period.

This shows that what we've experienced over the last six months is by no
means as bad as it could have been, or could still be. But at the same time
it  shows that market performance this bad is extremely rare. The S&P 500
has  done this badly (or worse) only 3.2% of the time over a span of 200
years. But  don't let any of that make you think it can't get worse.

It can. Of the 77 six-month periods worse than the most recent, the S&P  went
down further during the next six months 24 times -- losing an  average of an
additional 18.24%.

Okay, so the bad news is that, based on history, we've got about a 1/3
chance  of things still getting worse over the next six months. But of course
the good  news is that we've got, on the same basis, a 2/3 chance of things
getting  better.

But not that much better. Over the 53 times the S&P rose over the  next six
months, it only rose an average of 18.38%. Even if that happens now  over the
coming six months, that's not going to make up for the 19.23% loss of  the
last six months. And don't forget about the bad magic of compounding losses.
If you start with a dollar and you lose 19.23% of it, you've got 80.8 cents
left. It that then rises by 18.38%, you're only back up to 95.6 cents.

History class dismissed. Oh, and there will be a test tomorrow... (and every
day).

 - TOP.GIF
 - BOTTOM.GIF
 - audio.gif
 - vid.gif


Jim,

Can we meet on Friday to discuss this topic.
The person who supports power, Grant Masson,
will be out for the next two days.

Vince


Paulo,

FYI. I shall lok at it at home as well.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 11/27/2000
10:45 AM ---------------------------
From: Gillian Boyer@ENRON on 11/27/2000 10:25 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Arthur Andersen model validation request

Vince,

                  Our goal is to validate that the Enron Global Market book
administrators are accurately using the "spread option model" as developed by
the Research Group.    To determine this, we would like to provide you with
the inputs for a particular deal (as provided by a Global Markets book
administrator) and have you recalculate the deal value.   We will then
compare your results to the values calculated by Global Markets.

 Two Koch deals have been chosen due to their substantial P/L effect.  I have
attached the deal data in two forms: (1) the spread option model that Kara
Boudreau, Book Administrator EGM, provided and (2) an excel spreadsheet that
isolates the 2 deals.

 If there is anything more that we could provide, please don't hesitate to
call me at  x30968.

 Thank you so much for all of your help.

 Gillian

1.

2.


resend pheasant email to all.df


Hey I just wanted to thank you for taking me to the airport on Friday.  I owe
you a couple beers.  How was your weekend?


I sold 7000 to CES at the Allied meter for tomorrow - deal 169576.

Joann, let the Tenn schedulers know what additional volumes you need at Broad
Run.


Sarah Novosel and I are hearing rumors from the FERC that the two new RTO dockets on the agenda for tomorrow may be orders in the Northeast RTOs and the Southeast RTOs respectively, requiring single regional RTOs.  The orders are still being worked on, but may include technical conferences or settlement judge proceedings.

Pat Wood is being credited again with pulling together a majority (including Massey who has wanted a more aggressive approach in the RTO process) to get these orders on the agenda and hopefully voted out.  We will try to get more information and copies of the orders as soon as they are available.

Donna Fulton and Sarah Novosel

	Sarah Novosel 07/06/2001 04:51 PM 	   To: Kevin M Presto/Enron@EnronXGate, Mark Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Ader/HOU/EES@EES, Edward D Baughman/Enron@EnronXGate, Joe Gordon/Enron@EnronXGate, Janelle Scheuer/Enron@EnronXGate, mbrown9@enron.com, Mark Bernstein/HOU/EES@EES, John Llodra/Enron@EnronXGate, George Wood/Enron@EnronXGate, Paul J Broderick/Enron@EnronXGate, Jason Thompkins/Enron@EnronXGate, Mason Hamlin/Enron@EnronXGate, Robert Stalford/Enron@EnronXGate, Tom May/Enron@EnronXGate, Gautam Gupta/Enron@EnronXGate, Narsimha Misra/Enron@EnronXGate, Steve Montovano/NA/Enron@Enron, Garrett Tripp/TOR/ECT@ECT, Berney C Aucoin/Enron@EnronXGate, Jason Thompkins/Enron@EnronXGate, Rob Wheeler/Enron@EnronXGate, Rogers Herndon/Enron@EnronXGate, Jim Meyn/Enron@EnronXGate, Aleck Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT, Daniel Allegretti/NA/Enron@Enron, Pearce W Hammond/HOU/EES@EES, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Howard Fromer/NA/Enron@Enron, Kathleen Sullivan/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tom Hoatson/NA/Enron@Enron, Thane Twiggs/Enron@EnronXGate, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Charles Decker/HOU/EES@EES, Nick Politis/Enron@EnronXGate, sscott3@enron.com, Aleck Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Comnes/Enron@EnronXGate, Mike Roan/ENRON@enronXgate, Dan Staines/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Hoatson/NA/Enron@Enron, Howard Fromer/NA/Enron@Enron, Daniel Allegretti/NA/Enron@Enron, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON  cc:   Subject: FERC Agenda

FERC has two meetings in July (July 11 and 25) and then is on recess for the month of August.  The next FERC meeting after July will not be held until September 12.  Consequently, FERC tries to get out as many orders as it can in July so the backlog is not as great in September.

Consistent with that goal, FERC has included a lot of cases on its July 11 agenda.   While some of these cases may be stricken from the agenda for July 11(and either deferred to the July 25 meeting or until September), we are still expecting a lot of action from FERC in July.  The following cases are on FERC's July 11 agenda:

RTO Proceedings

Alliance RTO

SPP and Entergy RTOs

PJM and PJM West RTOs

New York RTO

New England RTO

RTO West

Southern RTO

Two new RTO dockets entitled "Regional Transmission Organizations"

Other Proceedings

Mirant vs. ISO New England (June 20, 2001 complaint by Mirant regarding ISO's proposal to revise procedures for mitigation of generators run out of economic merit order during transmission constraints).

NYSEG v. NYISO (regarding ISO's hybrid fixed block pricing rule)

NERC (these are old docket numbers that go back to orders issued in 1999 regarding TLR -- Southern and VEPCO sought rehearing of the TLR procedures in June, 1999, arguing that they could result in shedding load.  FERC may be responding to those rehearing requests).

HQ v. NYISO (regarding HQ's request for FERC to order ISO to reinstate the May 8, 2000 market clearing price)

Maine PUC vs. New England ISO (regarding the PUC's complaint against the NE ISO asking FERC to direct the ISO to recalculate the energy clearing price on May 8, 2000).

California Proceedings

San Diego Gas & Electric v. Sellers (Docket No. EL00-95-038 -- several parties have already sought rehearing of the June 19 order -- this could be a non-substantive tolling order (putting on hold these requests for rehearing), or it could be something more substantive.

Removing Obstacles to Increased Electric Generation and Natural Gas Supply in the Western United States

Please let me know if you have any questions concerning these proceedings.

Sarah


The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: Jeffrey Hodge
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: Jeff Hodge 5/19-29/01
Report Total: $692.70
Amount Due Employee: $692.70

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur
Expense.
http://xms.enron.com


Dan also made a comment when we were chatting that the trading floor and EOL
tour was "discouraging in a way" because they were not yet prepared to
regulate such activities. I thought it was kind of frightening that he feels
they need to regulate such a free market, although it was not clear exactly
what he meant and I was not able to pursue it with him.

    Bill

Shelley Corman
07/18/2000 11:56 PM
To: Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Bill Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rockford
Meyer/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, rkilmer@enron.com,
Ray Neppl/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Teb Lokey/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Bambi
Heckerman/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michael Moran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dorothy
McCoppin/FGT/Enron@ENRON, jplace@enron.com, Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON,
Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tony Pryor/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Frazier
King/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Dari Dornan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve
Hotte/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Julia
White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven J
Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, dfulton@enron.com

Subject: Larcamp Visit Today


here 'tis!
---------------------- Forwarded by Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron on 04/24/2001 05:00
PM ---------------------------

"Mignon Marks" <Mmarks@energy.state.ca.us> on 04/24/2001 04:50:07 PM
To: <joseph.alamo@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Copy of Scott Tomashefsky's CPUC Presentation re: Natural Gas
Infrastructure

Hi Joseph,
?
Attached is a set of the overheads Scott Tomashefsky used  during his
presentation at the CPUC workshop on natural gas  infrastructure.?
 - CPUC Gas Infrastructure Workshop (4_01).ppt


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 02/19/2000 01:20
PM ---------------------------

Clayton Vernon@ENRON
02/17/2000 09:07 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Transport Rates

Chris-

What about Transco Zone 3?

Hey, I'm coming by with a picture of Natasha for you.

It's a huge long-shot, of course, a shot in the dark, but, hey- what the
hell. The hardest thing about meeting her would be her getting a visa to come
here. They're almost unavailable except for family members of US citizens.
And, you'd be uncomfortable travelling there without an "escort," so to
speak, because you don't speak Russian.

Clay


I have measurement actuals for the first 14 days at this meter with no deal
in the system.  This is wellhead production.  Please advise.

Mary


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

May 11, 2001 5:00pm through May 14, 2001 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.

ENRON CENTER SOUTH DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:
Impact:  EES
Time:  Sat 5/12/2001 at   1:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 5/12/2001 at  5:00:00 PM CT
 Sat 5/12/2001 at 11:00:00 AM PT thru Sat 5/12/2001 at  3:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 5/12/2001 at  7:00:00 PM London thru Sat 5/12/2001 at  11:00:00 PM London
Outage:  Move vlans for EES in Enron Building
Environments Impacted:  EES in Enron Building
Purpose: Provide more capacity to the network
Backout: paste in old configs
Contact(s):  Gail Kettenbrink    713-853-4524
  Michael Huang      713-345-3201

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET: No Scheduled Outages.

MESSAGING: No Scheduled Outages.

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS:
Impact:  Corp, OTS, ETS
DATE:  MAY 15, 2001/2/2001 at  5:30:00 PM
Outage:  Migrate DSS Server to GTHOU-APPSQ03P
Environments Impacted:  DSS users will not be able to access the old server
(ENEDS01_ADAPT)after this date
Purpose: The existing server is outdated, migrating to SQL 2000 provides
increased
functionality and conforms to database platform requirements.
Backout:
Contact(s):  Mary Vollmer          713-853-3381
  Joe Hellsten           713-853-7346      713-545-4164

Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 5/11/2001 at  8:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 5/12/2001 at  10:00:00 PM CT
 Fri 5/11/2001 at  6:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 5/12/2001 at    8:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 5/12/2001 at  2:00:00 AM London thru Sun 5/13/2001 at  4:00:00 AM London
Outage:  CPU replacement on server sennacca.
Environments Impacted:  RMS
Purpose: Replace faulty CPU that is offline.
Backout: Restore server to old configuration.
Contact(s):  Malcolm Wells    713-345-3716

Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 5/11/2001 at  5:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 5/11/2001 at  5:15:00 PM CT
 Fri 5/11/2001 at  3:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 5/11/2001 at  3:15:00 PM PT
 Fri 5/11/2001 at  11:00:00 PM London thru Fri 5/11/2001 at  11:15:00 PM
London
Outage:  Decommission of the following servers:  intra, intra-dev, conman1,
aserv1, ardent, dbadmin
Environments Impacted:  Corp
Purpose: Server no longer used.  The servers will be decommissioned or
redeployed where necessary.
Backout:
Contact(s):  Malcolm Wells    713-345-3716

Impact:  CORP
Time:  Sat 5/12/2001 at   2:00:00 AM CT thru Sun 5/13/2001 at  5:00:00 PM CT
 Sat 5/12/2001 at 12:00:00 AM PT thru Sun 5/13/2001 at  3:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 5/12/2001 at  8:00:00 AM London thru Sun 5/13/2001 at 11:00:00 PM London
Outage:  Resource and OS upgrade to server fracture.
Environments Impacted:  Global company RMS  ECM
Purpose: An OS upgrade is needed to provide the disk upgrade solution.
Additionanl memory is needed as well.
Backout: Attach the old disk solution and reboot to old configuration.
Contact(s):  Malcolm Wells    713-345-3716

Impact:  ENA
Time:  Sat 5/12/2001 at  10:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 5/12/2001 at  10:15:00 PM CT
 Sat 5/12/2001 at    8:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 5/12/2001 at     8:15:00 PM PT
 Sun 5/13/2001 at  4:00:00 AM London thru Sun 5/13/2001 at  4:15:00 AM London
Outage:  Bounce PWRPROD1 database
Environments Impacted:  Enpower User
Purpose: Change some configuration to improve database performance
Backout: Use the old parameter file.
Contact(s):  Tantra Invedy  713 853 4304

SITARA:  No Scheduled Outages.

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY:
Impact:
Time:  Sat 5/12/2001 at  10:00:00 PM CT thru Sun 5/13/2001 at  1:00:00 AM CT
 Sat 5/12/2001 at    8:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 5/12/2001 at 11:00:00 PM PT
 Sun 5/13/2001 at  4:00:00 AM London thru Sun 5/13/2001 at  7:00:00 AM London
Outage:  Quarterly Maintenance - Telephone System
Environments Impacted:  All
Purpose: Quarterly maintenance. While voicemail nodes are being serviced (one
box at a time), a slight disruption will be experienced.
Messages will continue to be stored but will not be delivered until each node
of voicemail is back up and operational.
CMS call center management reporting will not be availalble during this
time.
Backout:
Contact(s):  Cynthia Siniard    713-853-0558

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 5/11/2001 at  6:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 5/11/2001 at  7:00:00 PM CT
 Fri 5/11/2001 at  4:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 5/11/2001 at  5:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 5/12/2001 at 12:00:00 AM London thru Sat 5/12/2001 at  1:00:00 AM London
Outage:  Memory replacement for server electron.
Environments Impacted:  Unify Users
Purpose: Replace faulty memory module.
Backout: Get new memory if necessary
Restart server with out memory as last resort
Contact(s):  Malcolm Wells    713-345-3716

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------
        FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center

Specific Help:
Information Risk Management   (713) 853-5536
SAP/ISC
        (713) 345-4727
Unify On-Call      (713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call     (713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS   (713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP    (713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR      (713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support      (713) 327-3893  [Pager]
EES Help Desk     (713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797


COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION CORPORATION
                        NOTICE TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES
                                  JUNE 07, 2001

Notice ID: 2783
5 - NO RESPONSE REQUIRED

SUBJECT: CAPACITY UPDATE EFFECTIVE FOR FRIDAY, JUNE 8, 2001

                CHANGES ARE INDICATED WITH AN *

Effective Friday June 8, 2001, capacities will be as follows:

Excess MDWQ              Available +
ISS Withdrawals          Available
SIT Withdrawals          Available
Imbalance Drawdowns      Available
PAL Lends/Unparks        Available

Excess MDIQ              Available +
ISS Injections           Available
SIT Injections           Available
Imbalance Paybacks       Available
PAL Parks/Loan Paybacks  Available

+ Call Gas Control 24 hours in advance at (304) 357-2606 to request approval.

Receipt capacity will be as follows:

TENNESSEE:

Brinker (B12)            20,000
Broad Run (B9)          450,000
Cambridge (B10)          20,000
Dungannon (B11)          50,000
Highland (B17)           25,000
Milford (B18)            15,000
North Greenwood (B22)         0
Unionville (B15)         50,000

TEXAS EASTERN:

Delmont (C16)                 0
Eagle (C22)              30,000
Hooker (C9)              50,000
Pennsburg (C23)          50,000
Windridge (C12)          50,000

NATIONAL FUEL:

Independence (M1)        10,000
Ellwood City (L1)        10,000

TRANSCO:

Downingtown (E3)          5,000
Emporia I (E13)         120,000
Rockville (E2)           65,000
Dranesville (E1)         60,000 *

ALGONQUIN:

Ramapo (R1)              50,000

ANR:

Paulding/Cecil          105,000
(F1, A2)

LEBANON AGGREGATE       195,000
(A4, F2, C4, D3)

TOLEDO AGGREGATE        225,000
(A3, F4, 734462)

COLUMBIA GULF:
(801)

TCO-Leach             2,218,000

Internal point non-firm capacity will be as follows:

Lanham                No Restrictions

Delivery capacity (non-firm) will be as follows:

TRANSCO:

Martins Creek (MA 21)    25,000
Young Woman's Creek      15,000
   (MA 36)

ALGONQUIN:

Hanover (MA 22)         166,000

EQUITRANS:

Fallen Timber (MA 35)    35,000
(MLI K1)

Waynesburg-Rhinehart     30,000
(MA 26) (MLI K2)

OPT-30 will be available in all market areas.
OPT-60 will be available in all market areas.

Market Area delivery capacity (non-firm) will be as follows:

Operating Area 1
     Market Area 33       No Restrictions
     Market Area 34       No Restrictions

Operating Area 2
     Market Area 20       No Restrictions

Operating Area 3
     Market Area 15       No Restrictions
     Market Area 16       No Restrictions
     Market Area 17       No Restrictions
     Market Area 18       No Restrictions
     Market Area 19       No Restrictions

Operating Area 4
     Market Area 21       No Restrictions
     Market Area 22       No Restrictions
     Market Area 23       No Restrictions
     Market Area 24       No Restrictions
     Market Area 25       No Restrictions
     Market Area 29       No Restrictions

Operating Area 5
     Market Area 02       No Restrictions
     Market Area 07       No Restrictions

Operating Area 6
     Market Area 10       No Restrictions
     Market Area 11       No Restrictions
     Market Area 12       No Restrictions
     Market Area 13       No Restrictions
     Market Area 14       No Restrictions

Operating Area 7
     Market Area 01       No Restrictions
     Market Area 03       No Restrictions
     Market Area 04       No Restrictions
     Market Area 05       No Restrictions
     Market Area 06       No Restrictions
     Market Area 08       No Restrictions
     Market Area 09       No Restrictions

Operating Area 8
     Market Area 26       No Restrictions
     Market Area 27       No Restrictions
     Market Area 32       No Restrictions
     Market Area 35       No Restrictions
     Market Area 36       No Restrictions
     Market Area 38       No Restrictions
     Market Area 39       No Restrictions
     Market Area 40       No Restrictions

Operating Area 10
     Market Area 28       No Restrictions
     Market Area 30       No Restrictions
     Market Area 31       No Restrictions

If you have any questions, please contact your Account
Representative.


I had the same thought last night, as to the QSE agreement, if it is only a month or two until UBS would execute that with ERCOT.  I am hoping that the Enron credit person attending can, if requested, give background on the credit requirements that would be placed on UBS if it became a QSE.  Please let me know the number of attendees when you find out so that we can provide adequate copies for those needing them.  Thanks. -- David

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 8:44 AM
To:	Portz, David
Cc:	Gilbert-smith, Doug; Day, Smith L.; Sager, Elizabeth; Bradford, William S.; Sacks, Edward; Miller, Jeffrey; Will, Lloyd; Presto, Kevin M.; Bailey, Debra; Haedicke, Mark E.
Subject:	RE: UBS Sign-Off on ERCOT Docs

After thinking about this last night, I would still like to bring to the meeting today at 1pm all the documents that would be necessary for UBS to be "fully" functioning so that we can get this data in front of the UBS legal group.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Portz, David
Sent:	Wednesday, January 30, 2002 5:25 PM
To:	Steffes, James D.
Cc:	Gilbert-smith, Doug; Day, Smith L.; Sager, Elizabeth; Bradford, William S.; Sacks, Edward; Miller, Jeffrey; Will, Lloyd; Presto, Kevin M.; Bailey, Debra; Haedicke, Mark E.
Subject:	RE: UBS Sign-Off on ERCOT Docs

I understand from Smith Day that APX forwarded us today a format of contract relating to their potentially serving as QSE for UBS AG trading.  APX is apparently willing to contract on a month-to-month basis (thus allowing us to move to our own IT interface with ERCOT as soon as possible).

As to item two below, until UBS would have the IT capability (currently under development and projected to be roughly a month from completion) to become certified to act as its own QSE, it would not need to execute any 'market participant' agreement with ERCOT in order to be a power marketer within ERCOT.  As soon as UBS desired to trade Renewable Energy Credits ("RECs"), it would need to sign a standard-form agreement with ERCOT in order to maintain a REC account.

Trading conducted by UBS with any given counterparty within ERCOT would be pursuant to 'UBSWarburgEnergyOnline' GTCs or else subject to discrete negotiated wholesale power enabling agreements and/or ISDA master agreements. The ERCOT ISO would have no connection with such relationship documents supporting UBS AG trading activities.  On the other hand, as UBS's likely counterparties are entities with wholesale power trading activities of national scope, the timeline for trading in ERCOT is linked to the timeline for completing wholesale power/financial master enabling agreements approved by UBS.  Doug Gilbert-Smith this afternoon identified the following counterparties in decreasing order of of their priority as trading partners in ERCOT:

TXU Energy Trading
BP Energy Company
Reliant Energy Services, Inc.
Aquila Power Corporation
Morgan Stanley capitral Group
Constellation Power Source
FPL Energy Power Marketing, Inc.
American Electic Power Service Corporation
Mirant Americas Energy Marketing, LP
Calpine Energy Servicces LP
Dynegy Marketing & Trade
LCRA --Lower Colorado River Authority

along with a couple of incumbent utilities:

San Antonio City Public Service
Reliant HL&P

If you desire Doug Gilbert -Smith to sit in on this meeting, then it would have to be scheduled for Thursday.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Wednesday, January 30, 2002 8:41 AM
To:	Gilbert-smith, Doug; Day, Smith L.; Sager, Elizabeth; Portz, David
Cc:	Will, Lloyd; Presto, Kevin M.; Bailey, Debra; Haedicke, Mark E.
Subject:	UBS Sign-Off on ERCOT Docs

UBS Legal and UBS Credit is heading to Houston this Thursday and Friday.  I have asked that ERCOT matters get 1 hour to discuss the necessary contracts that UBS will need to sign to participate in the ERCOT market.

Basically, my understanding is the following --

1.	PUCT Registration Form for Power Marketer
2.	ERCOT ISO Information
	QSE [Portz, David]   N/A until IT platform is ready for UBS to serve as its own QSE
	LSE [Portz, David]   N/A
	Wholesale Enabling Agreement [Portz, David]   No ERCOT  involvement
	Other [Portz, David]   REC Trading Account Agreement
3.	APX Agreement [Portz, David]   initially
4.	Other

Given the list of issues, this assumes that UBSW Energy will not be selling electricity at retail.  If we need this for Day 1, we would have to get an additional license from the PUCT.

Thanks,

Jim


Lynn:  Weren't you going to take a look at the Trader Guidelines for
Argentina?  Let me know if you have any questions or if I can help you
further.  Thanks.  SS


Anne: It was great to see you, you look great and seem happy. I hope all goes
well for you in the year to come. BT


This is the pleading that we filed yesterday in the Midwest proceedings - both Alliance RTO and Midwest ISO as well as National Grid.  We ask the FERC to take immediate action giving specific guidance on the RTO structure based on the SE mediation report by the ALJ (governance, stakeholder process and congestion management using LMP).  After such guidance we suggest that the order require a collaborative process of all parties to work out the details.

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrea Settanni [mailto:asettanni@bracepatt.com]
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 6:58 PM
To: Nicolay, Christi L.; Fulton, Donna; Stroup, Kerry; Noske, Linda J.;
Roan, Michael; Novosel, Sarah
Cc: Steffes, James D.
Subject: ALLIANCE PROTEST AS FILED 9/17/2001 - RT01-88-005, ET. AL.

Attached is the protest as filed (minus any spacing errors, which occurred only due to the conversion to Word to send to you).

Andrea M. Settanni
Bracewell & Patterson, L.L.P.
2000 K Street, N.W.
Suite 500
Washington, D.C.  20006-1872
(202) 828-7631 (phone)
(202) 857-2128 (fax)
asettanni@bracepatt.com


Dave, why don't you send it to Steve for review.  The consultant doing the
training will be working from this.

When do we want to set up the training?  Our lawyers are ready to go.

Thanks.  Michelle

Dave Hill@ENRON
10/17/2000 06:03 PM
To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: CGAS Harassment Policy

Do you want me to forward this as is to Steve Pruett or are you going to send
it to the consultant doing the training?
Dave

Michelle Cash@ECT
10/16/2000 05:04 PM
To: Dave Hill/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: CGAS Harassment Policy

sounds fine to me.  Michelle

Dave Hill@ENRON
10/16/2000 03:52 PM
To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: CGAS Harassment Policy

Michelle,

Susan Tosoni said the revisions will not be out before Jan. 2001.  Valeria
said any changes will be minor.  Do you want to just proceed with this one?

Thanks,
Dave

Michelle Cash@ECT
10/15/2000 08:02 PM
To: Dave Hill/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: CGAS Harassment Policy

Dave,

Is this the proposed, revised policy that OLER is working on?  The reason I
ask is that OLER is revising all Enron policies right now, and I think that
the harassment prevention policy is being revised as well.  I'd just as soon
we use the latest and greatest instead of the one that is soon to be
replaced.  Check with Valeria Hope or Susan Tosoni about the status.

Thanks.

Michelle

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Dave Hill @ ENRON                           10/13/2000 04:14 PM

To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: CGAS Harassment Policy

Michelle,

Here is Enron's harassment policy and the modification I made for CGAS.  Let
me know what you think.

Thanks,
Dave


-----Original Message-----
From: Diomedes Christodoulou [mailto:diomedes@cumulouscapital.com]
Sent: 14 December 2001 19:20
To: 'mark.haedicke@enron.com'
Subject: ECI Agreeemnts

Hi Mark,

I hope you are well.

Please let me know if you have a position on my previous email. I believe the ECI contracts are with non bankrupt Enron entities (EI) and also they are linked to operating companies in Brazil and Bolivia (the cash considerations were in exchange for a carried interest and for equity options that ECI had a right to).

I realize a lot is going on but the unpaid amounts are very big sums from my standpoint and I need to discuss this with someone with the authority to give me Enron's official position. As I said Mark I want to do this before taking any other steps.

Thanks,

Diomedes.


-----Original Message-----
From: BRIAN CLANCY, SALOMON SMITH BARNEY [mailto:BCLANCY1@bloomberg.net]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 3:17 PM
To: Lewis, James W.
Subject: (BN ) Why Should Enron's Employees Be Owed Anything?: Micha

SEE FILE

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This was prepared for informational purposes only.  It is not an official confirmation of terms.  It is based on infor-
mation generally available to the public from sources believed to be reliable.  No representation is made that it is
accurate or complete or that any returns indicated will be achieved. Changes to assumptions may have a material impact
on returns. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Price/availability subject to change without notice.
Additional info. available on request.  This is neither an offerto sell nor a solicitation of any offer to buy a new
security. For further info on a new issue, including a prospectus,please contact your Salomon Smith Barney salesperson.


wassup wassup wassup.

plan drinks for any day early in the week

Jennifer Shipos
11/09/2000 05:31 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

When do you want your drinks that I owe you?  I think it's time to have
another group happy hour.  It doesn't seem like you have been your normal
self recently.


You guys are going to kill me, but I just got a ticket on the floor for the
Rockets game tonight.  I was hoping I could get cell phone numbers from a few
of you so that I could maybe meet up with y'all after the game.  I definitely
want to see everyone and could "go out" later if anyone's interested.

Susan
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT on 10/12/2000 12:02
PM ---------------------------

Susan M Scott
10/11/2000 08:15 AM
To: Ashleastu@aol.com @ ENRON
cc: sarah_c_buck@hotmail.com@ENRON, julianna.grisham@halliburton.com@ENRON,
jkbowles@hotmail.com@ENRON, Lisa.A.Meador@chase.com@ENRON
Subject: Re: how about carraba's this thursday night? (oct 12th)

Hey girls,

I'm back from London (the trip was incredible) and would love to see all of
you this Thursday.  I hope we can all make it.

Susan

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Ashleastu@aol.com                           10/08/2000 10:46 PM

To: sarah_c_buck@hotmail.com, julianna.grisham@halliburton.com,
jkbowles@hotmail.com, Susan.M.Scott@enron.com, Lisa.A.Meador@chase.com
cc:
Subject: how about carraba's this thursday night? (oct 12th)

ok, eveyone - let's this again!! carraba's this thursday night around
8:45ish!! it will be an ORIGINAL TASTERS  DINNER GET TOGETHER!!! '

email me and let me know if this fits into your schedule!

love,
ashlea


Deutsche Bank has gotten back to me and is vacillating on what they want to
do with the Bankers Trust trades.  In particular, they haven't thought
through what they want to do with the online trades, don't like on online
documentation, and now they think they may want to do a full novation of the
trades once they decide how to resolve this.  So, until we hear back from
them (they said in about a week), just let the Bankers Trust financial trades
and master sit.


Attached is SERC's 9/28 letter telling NERC that TVA and Enron were still
working on the wording, but may not reach agreement. I don't think we had
seen this before.  However, since this was sent last week before the latest
round of language, I don't think we need to worry about it.
---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 10/04/99
10:36 AM ---------------------------

Steven J Kean@EES
10/04/99 10:00 AM
To: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: SERC/TVA/Enron

---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/HOU/EES on 10/04/99 09:59
AM ---------------------------

Sherri Reinartz@ENRON
09/30/99 01:15 PM
To: Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron, Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: SERC/TVA/Enron

Did you guys get this?  SRS
---------------------- Forwarded by Sherri Reinartz/Corp/Enron on 09/30/99
01:13 PM ---------------------------

"Jim Maughn" <jmaughn@serc1.org> on 09/28/99 04:54:33 PM
Please respond to "Jim Maughn" <jmaughn@serc1.org>
To: kamole@nipsco.com, hhawks@tenaska.com, mike.gent@nerc.com
cc: wtboston@tva.gov, Sherri Reinartz/Corp/Enron@Enron,
wreinke@duke-energy.com, jmaughn@serc1.org
Subject: SERC/TVA/Enron

Gentlemen:
Attached is SERC's interim report to NERC and the PITF on the subject dispute.
Jim Maughn
 - att1.htm
 - SERC Enron TVA NERC ltr.doc


Can you update the original file you sent with Bryce's changes below.  I am afraid I do not understand exactly what I should change on Sequent.

Thanks,
Stacey

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Aucoin, Evelyn
Sent:	Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:06 AM
To:	White, Stacey W.
Subject:	FW: Pre-bankruptcy Payouts31.xls

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Baxter, Bryce
Sent:	Tuesday, January 15, 2002 3:32 PM
To:	Aucoin, Evelyn
Cc:	Miroballi, Angelo; Dhont, Margaret
Subject:	Pre-bankruptcy Payouts31.xls

We updated Sequent for changes that were made today.  I also updated the comment.  Let me know if you have any questions.  Thanks.

 << File: Pre-bankruptcy Payouts31.xls >>


XX-Large.  Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hitchcock, Dorie
Sent:	Monday, September 24, 2001 3:20 PM
To:	Arap, Sami; Brownfeld, Gail; Bruce, Robert; Calo, Andrea; Corbet, Nancy; Daniels, Eddy; Donovan, Elisa; Evans, Mark (London Legal); Freed, Richard; Gleason, Laurel; Hall, Steve C. (Legal); Hansen, Leslie; Harkness, Cynthia; Henry, Joseph; Hrabik, Joe; Kraske, Paul; Krenz, William; Lee, Matthias; Lundstrom, Bruce; Marsh, Jonathan; Maynard, Michelle; McBride, Jane; McCarrel, Steven; Merten, Eric; Minns, David; Nelson, Bonnie; Nemec, Gerald; Novak, John; Powell, Mark; Ralston, Andrew; Rapp, Bill; Rossi, Robbi; Schwartzenburg, John; Shackleton, Sara; Sinclair, Sarah; 'mike.g.smith@enron.com'; Sole III, Carlos; Stoler, Lou; Watanabe, Luiz; Williams, Robert C.; Wood, Janet
Subject:	SHIRT SIZES

If you are unable to send the completed reply form at this time, please forward your shirt size so we can finalize the order.
Shirt sizes are as follows:
Small / Medium (chest size 34" - 36")
Large / X-Large (chest size 42" - 44")
XX-Large (chest size 46" - 48")
The shirt is a short-sleeve, button down cotton print.
Thanks for your assistance.

Dorie Hitchcock
Event Manager
Enron
1400 Smith Street
Suite 3640a
Houston, TX  77002
Telephone:  (713) 853-6978
Fax:  (713) 646-5800
Cell:  (713) 594-7093
E-Mail:  dorie.hitchcock@enron.com


Dear Board Task Force:
Attached please find meeting notes for the industry meetings held on April 17
and 26.  Rae

 - status report 4-17 to 4-26-00.pdf


Chris, sounds good - a) Wes will work with you on earnings recognition issues
for Pastoria and b) selling the LM's and the LV Cogen asset is a good call
regardless of the hit.  Some accounting flexibility on the LV hit may be
worthwhile.  Value protected counts just as much as new value created - you
are doing the right thing.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 11/20/2000
11:31 AM ---------------------------

Christopher F Calger
11/19/2000 01:35 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Update on Pastoria and Las Vegas Sale

Dave,

We made good progress last week on the sale of Pastoria and Las Vegas.
Kelemen is doing a great job.

In general, Calpine is more agressive and can move quicker than AES - AES has
one small team on both deals and is slower at turning docs.  Without giving
up any rights or discouraging AES from pursuing Pastoria, we are trying to
position AES on LV and keep Calpine's value for Pastoria close to their
original bid.

Calpine - Pastoria
Early in the week, Calpine clawed back about $12 million from their bid
primarily by claiming that the turbine contract is overpriced by $10 million,
and their bid assumed  "market" for the turbines.   While they are correct
(the extra $10 million for Catalytica), we have gotten most of that back.
There bid now is $37MM (vs. $41) plus up to $5MM if the contingency is not
used between signing and closing.  Calpine also wanted to include other
permits (other than CEC) as conditions precedent and they wanted us to rep
that the scheduled permits are the only ones required to construct and
operate.  This is far too onerous and we are pushing back on this.  Our plan
is to get a PSA that only has HSR and CEC permit as conditions precedent.
The other negotiating item is with respect to mechanics of continuing the
development between signing and closing, and who pays for it and who is at
risk.  This is relevant if you think of the scenario where incremental costs
are necessary in order to get the Non-appealable CEC Permit.

AES - Pastoria
Same PSA issues as above, but AES seems more skiddish about the development
risks (other than CEC).  They want to change some of the EPC contract terms,
they want a more-involved transition team and  they want us to take more risk
on post-signing/pre-closing development.  Their bid was $27million plus
upside for the 250MW expansion and a services agreement for fuel supply and
schedule coordination services.  We have given them term sheets that provide
for an extra $10 million for the 250MW expansion and approximately $750,000
per year of risk-free service revenues.  They have not yet responded.  By
contrast, Calpine does not want to use NEPCO, and they dont want our services
or any material ongoing involvement (cleaner).

CEC Process:
On Thursday night we received the Presiding Members Proposed Decision (PMPD),
recommending approval of the Project.  By statute, this is one month early
and the quickest in California to date.  This is a 400 page document and we
are combing through it to determine any material changes from our original
filing and the original staff assessment - none detected yet.  The stated
process is that we would receive our CEC permit on December 20, after which
their is a 30 day appeal period.  If there is no appeal, the process is done
Jan 19.  For purposes of handicapping the risk, we have already gone through
the public hearing process.  While there was some intervention, our remote
site is not in the environmental/NIMBY crosshairs like other projects.  In
order for the appeal process to derail the timing, someone needs to show that
(i) a law was broken or (ii) the CEC analysis is seriously flawed.  In the
past two years five plants were approved and only one was appealed - this was
due to a resident that was not notified and therefore the project broke the
law.   This caused a 4 month delay.   The two bidders will not take the risk
on the CEC permit getting appealed.  In Calpine's words, it would look pretty
bad on Wall Street if they had to write off a $40MM development fee paid to
Enron for nothing!

AES-Las Vegas
They seem genuinely interested in the asset - more the expansion than the
QF.  They like LM6000's and think they are great resource for the location.
We told them they are behind the other bidders both on time and value.  They
have reviewed the EPC contract and understand the quality of the LD's,
liability limits and the consortium EPC group.  They indicated that they have
no problem with getting incremental insurance in order to protect the value
of hitting June, 2002.  They want to meet with the EPC group and provide
input to the notice to proceed.  Closing for them on this deal is a little
cleaner than Pastoria because we have the permits in hand, and it is not as
big a bet (smaller asset, existing operation, less political risk, etc.).
Our plan is to turn the PSA one more time (Monday) and then tell them that if
they get their bid up a few million ($26MM to say $30MM), we will focus on
them for a week or so to try to get it closed.

Deal Timing - Pastoria: Firm up Calpine on value and risk allocation during
the next week and aim for signing and HSR filing on December 1.  Sometime
before December 1 we need to finalize our plans with respect to earnings
recognition.  We have been talking with Deffner, Westfall and lawyers about
different structures involving either (i) LJM; (ii) AIG; or (iii) selling to
Calpine with liquidated damages relating to CEC Permit.  As you can imagine,
there are pros and cons to each approach.  We expect to know more on this by
Wednesday of this week and will update you at that time.

Deal Timing - Las Vegas: The only condition precedent should be the HSR.  If
they can move quicker, we will target December 1 to sign and late Dec to
close.   The urgency relates to schedule - the longer we wait, the greater
the risk of missing June 2002 COD.  With respect to QIV earnings, AES' bid
results in a $6MM hit.  Signing the deal to sell reduces fair market
valuation.  Two possibilities we are exploring: If AES increases its bid, the
hit may be neglibible; alternatively we may be able to discount the LM6000's
being sold to them, which may not show up as a hit since the LM6000 pool is
accrual and being sold into Turbopark.  Like the Pastoria analysis, we will
know more this week and will update you when we know.

Regards,

Chris


FYI - our phone call

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 01/31/2001 01:21 PM -----

	Samantha Boyd@ENRON
	01/29/2001 04:59 PM

		 To: dooleys@coned.com
		 cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Sylvia at Con Edison

Per Sara Shackleton's previous e-mail, attached for your review is Enron
North America Corp.'s form of guaranty with most of your requested changes
(the "ENA Guaranty") and a comparison of your guaranty markup against the ENA
Guaranty.

Samantha M. Boyd
Sr. Legal Specialist
Enron North America, Corp.
1400 Smith, EB3802A
Houston, TX  77002
Phone:  (713) 853-9188
Fax:  (713) 646-3490
email:  samantha.boyd@enron.com


Rachel:
Are we still on for Sunday at 8:30?  Are we playing singles or doubles?

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


Phillip,

FYI  I will be on vacation from 9/22 until 10/11.

See you in two weeks.
Robin


Eric, these are already in my list that I sent you.

Kay

"Thompson, Peter J." <peterthompson@akllp.com> on 11/20/2000 10:53:15 AM
To: <eric.boyt@enron.com>
cc: "Kay Mann (E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>

Subject: FW: Additional Information for GE Contract

Here are some additional info requests that I just sent to Kay Mann.

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:    Thompson, Peter J.
> Sent:   Monday, November 20, 2000 11:40 AM
> To:   Kay Mann (E-mail)
> Subject:   Additional Information for GE Contract
>
> I also need the following information that I requested in my 11/17
> e-mail:
>
> 1.   Payee and Address for Invoices referenced in Section 6.7.2 of
> the Agreement
>
> 2.   Section 6.7.1 Agreement reference
>


This is a great one... click on the address below.

 > http://www.mediatrip.com/shows/phone_flash.html

______________________________________________________________________________
_______
Get more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com


MAKE PLANS NOW to ATTEND the PREMIER ENERGY EVENT of 2002!

12th ANNUAL NESA ENERGY EXPO
April 29 through May 2, 2002
George R. Brown Convention Center
Houston, Texas

NEW TO the PROGRAM
*	Monday evening Black Tie Gala featuring VIP Keynote Speaker, The
Honorable George Bush, forty-first President of the United States, and live
entertainment from Aaron Neville
*	Exhibits and Conference portions will be held in Exhibit Hall A
*	Opening Reception in Exhibit Hall A for all delegates
*	Thursday morning Continental Breakfast in the Exhibit Hall sponsored
by Cinergy

AVAILABLE JANUARY 31
*	Individual Gala Registration Information
	LIMITED GALA TICKETS available at $500.00 per NESA Member, includes
trade show admission
*	Agenda for the 2002 Expo General Session
	Keynote Address by Chairman Michael Williams, Texas Railroad
Commission
*	Conference and Trade Show Delegate Registration Information

The Conference and Exhibit Committees are already planning for the 2002
event and brochures outlining meeting activities are available for your
review. Visit our web site at www.nesanet.org <http://www.nesanet.org>  for
the Sponsorship and Advertising Opportunities and Exhibit Reservation
brochures.  Delegate registration materials will be posted on our web site
and emailed to all NESA Members on January 31.  A flyer containing
additional NESA Energy Expo 2002 information is attached below for your
review in an Adobe Acrobat PDF file.

Thank you for your consideration of participation at NESA's Energy Expo 2002
- THE Energy Services Trade Show of the Year!

Tracy Cummins, NESA
Vice President of Education
(713) 856-6525
tracy.cummins@nesanet.org <mailto:tracy.cummins@nesanet.org>

 <<Energy Expo 2002 Email #2.pdf>>

To UNSUBSCRIBE from the NESA / HEA Member Email Blast list please respond to
this email with the word UNSUBSCRIBE typed into the subject field.  This
will preclude you from receiving any email blasts in the future, but hard
copies of the material will be sent to your attention.

 - Energy Expo 2002 Email #2.pdf


Thanks for the information.  Joe got a chuckle  last night when I told him
that you tried his ketchup trick.


Start Date: 4/26/01; HourAhead hour: 15;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042615.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/26/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: CISO_EPMI_DESERT
  ENGY_TYPE: NFRM