Further information on Rice.  Given the outcome (read the following email as
well) I didn't feel the need to involve anyone else.  Let me know if you
disagree.

Thanks,
Brad

----- Forwarded by Brad Richter/Enron Communications on 03/05/01 08:24 AM
-----

	Radu Tutos
	03/02/01 04:11 PM

		 To: Brad Richter/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: Rice University misunderstanding

Brad,

The complaint that we have received from Rice regarding the Bremen circuit
seems to be the result of a misunderstanding. In brief, this is what happened:

Rice is currently under contract with us to purchase  a Houston-Bremen
circuit starting February 2002.  Initially the circuit was supposed to be on
line February 2001 (last month), but at Rice's request, we bought back the
circuit for the first 1 year.

We have recently been approached again by Rice to provide them with an
interim circuit on the same route ASAP, and we have just submitted to them a
termsheet in that regard.

Most likely, the misunderstanding came about as a result of repeated
modifications of the starting date for the circuit, all of which were
requested by Rice.  Again, our obligation under the existing contracts is to
deliver the circuit February 2002, almost a year from now.

I discussed this problem with Brad Nebergall (origination), and he made a
priority to explain the situation with the upper management at Rice.

thanks,

Radu Tutos
Director, TDS
Enron Broadband Services
office  713-853-3990
cell     713-304-7602


Here's the latest -
The Short Term West Services desk bought power from Sierra Pacific Holding
Co. for 4/29 and 4/30. Then, Bob Ellery, our contact there, called the Real
Time desk and said they had lost a unit and needed to buy some of the power
back from us. The deals are in our system as follows:

594854
EPMI buys Sierra Pac.
NP-15
4/29 - 45 mw round-the-clock
4/30 - 40 mw round-the-clock
$218 off peak
$328 on peak

595714
Short Term West Hourly sells Automated Power Exchange (Sierra's scheduling
coordinator)
NP-15
4/29 - 19 mw round-the-clock
$228
(Total Value = $103,968)

Because Sierra's buy-back was in the Real Time market, we sold to their SC,
not Sierra itself. Also, confirm letters don't go out on hour-ahead trades,
which could be why you're running into some confusion. Let me know if this
helps, and I'll continue to look for a deal flowing on 4/30. The Real Time
group told me there was one, but it's only for the first 6 hours, not the
whole day.

I'll get back to you soon.

Kate

Mark Confer
05/02/2001 07:20 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Any Update

Kate, what is the latest regarding Sierra Pacific Industries and the buy
backs for the 29th & 30th in the amount of $103,968 for each day?  Let me
know if I can obtain more information for you.  The payment terms are net 5
days after receipt of invoice, which they faxed to me on April 30th.

Again, thanks for all your help regarding this and all the EES items.

Mark


Start Date: 4/11/01; HourAhead hour: 22;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041122.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/11/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_GUZ
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 22 / Preferred:  49.25 / Final:  49.24)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE3
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/11/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


Darrell,

Who are we physically receiving gas from at POI 59927, the GPM Zia Plant.  Is it GPM or Conoco?   I found a letter from GPM requesting Conoco to be their agent at this point so I need to know if this is GPM's point and Conoco is only the agent or is Conoco actually the physical operator.  Please let me know as soon as possible.

Thanks

Linda


---------------------- Forwarded by Larry F Campbell/NA/Enron on 08/28/2000
08:01 AM ---------------------------

"An La" <an1229@hotmail.com> on 08/25/2000 09:10:07 AM
To: lcampbel@enron.com, apnikko@yahoo.com, Blt0013@aol.com,
catherinecao@cs.com, ckcao@aol.com, qla@houston.rr.com, minhduy@hotmail.com,
hxdinh@hotmail.com, Huy.Dinh@enron.com, K3ITH277@aol.com, KHOA@thinklink.com,
klchun@U.Arizona.EDU, koryn2@hotmail.com, knguyen@looksmart.net,
melindango@yahoo.com, Paul_Shah@hotmail.com, stevenlee@myself.com,
tula66@hotmail.com
cc:

Subject: Fwd: Why you don't drink till you pass out.....

>From: "thu nguyen" <thunguyen2@hotmail.com>
>To: an1229@hotmail.com, rickdrina@aol.com, lt76@altavista.com,
>monika0030@hotmail.com, PeterH.Nguyen@compaq.com, jredor@hotmail.com,
>johnnyopimpmd@yahoo.com, noela@raremedium.com, ptn@prucka.com,
>uyen01@hotmail.com
>Subject: Fwd: Why you don't drink till you pass out.....
>Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 19:54:25 CDT
>
>
>
>
>>From: "Mindy Nguyen" <mindy515@hotmail.com>
>>To: bigheadanthony@hotmail.com, Debra_Lee@Manulife-Venture.com,
>>Elepanio@prodigy.net, HNguyen@houston.rr.com, monika0030@hotmail.com,
>>thunguyen2@hotmail.com
>>Subject: Fwd: Why you don't drink till you pass out.....
>>Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 05:40:13 GMT
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>From: D12eamGRL@aol.com
>>>To: bighead-antoine@communityconnect.com, xjkim@hotmail.com,
>>>mindy515@hotmail.com, natedoggybird@hotmail.com, Udabich@aol.com,
>>>thoa512@hotmail.com, tuan2three@hotmail.com
>>>Subject: Fwd: Why you don't drink till you pass out.....
>>>Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2000 02:02:43 EDT
>>>
>>>

________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com

Return-path: <CMN123@cs.com>
From: CMN123@cs.com
Full-name: CMN123
Message-ID: <ae.99cc0bd.26d41a25@cs.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2000 14:02:13 EDT
Subject: Fwd: Why you don't drink till you pass out.....
To: juanaguinaga@hotmail.com, DNA7037@gateway.net, comptont@slu.edu,
fflorez2@texas.net, burglars@flash.net, KLAPIANO@aol.com, Acee211@aol.com,
michellinamoya@hotmail.com, tngo@txmedmgt.com, Armani5686@aol.com,
D12eamGRL@aol.com, AzNcHk@aol.com, brandyortiz@hotmail.com,
dennispunzalan@reliantenergy.com, jruff01@sprintspectrum.com,
bvera@austin-safeplace.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="part2_66.6cb574c.26d41a25_boundary"
X-Mailer: CompuServe 2000 32-bit sub 103

Return-Path: <baylor@texas.net>
Received: from  rly-yc01.mx.aol.com (rly-yc01.mail.aol.com [172.18.149.33])
by air-yc05.mail.aol.com (v75_b3.11) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Aug 2000 13:20:37
-0400
Received: from  mw1.texas.net (mw1.texas.net [206.127.30.11]) by
rly-yc01.mx.aol.com (v75_b3.9) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Aug 2000 13:19:38 -0400
Received: from Devin.texas.net (tcnet01-006.houston.texas.net
[216.166.44.6])          by mw1.texas.net (2.4/2.4) with SMTP   id MAA22583;
Tue, 22 Aug 2000 12:19:18 -0500 (CDT)
From: "J. Devin Stewart" <baylor@texas.net>
To: "Chau Nguyen" <CMN123@cs.com>, "Carlos Verver" <CRverver@aol.com>,
"Huy Pham (E-mail)" <hphamer@hotmail.com>,        "Julie Shelton"
<jkshelton@email.msn.com>,        "Tara Salinas" <MsPriss700@aol.com>, "Shane
Currie" <Mymate1@cs.com>,        "Jamie Wilson"
<phunkyjamie@earthlink.net>,        "Sohail Hooda" <shooda@lycos.com>,
"Thomas Watts" <thomas@mmihouston.com>,        "Robert Warren"
<warren107@hotmail.com>
Subject: Why you don't drink till you pass out.....
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2000 12:13:42 -0500
Message-ID: <003e01c00c5c$52506960$062ca6d8@Devin.texas.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_003F_01C00C32.697A6160"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2232.26
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4
Importance: Normal

 - priceless2.jpg


Thanks for all your hard work and Happy Birthday!

Lunch will be provided on Friday, April 13, by Tim Belden and Chris Calger to
everyone on the floor as a thanks for all you've done for Enron this month.
We'll also celebrate this month's birthdays by having cookies for everyone.


David

At present we have we do not use them and have put a hold on anyone using them.

We talked to them but they refused to sign a non solicitation clause.

Their principle in the Houston office is a guy called Lyndon Taylor - former Enron employee.

He called me today and has agreed to sign our non-solicitation clause - I think this is the preferrable strategy as Lyndon is well connected as a former Enron employee and this will take them out for 12 months.

Given that he is prepared to sign up to this now means he may have not had any success in calling in.

Neil

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Oxley, David
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 1:55 PM
To:	Shankman, Jeffrey A.
Cc:	Mcconnell, Mike; Haedicke, Mark E.; Davies, Neil
Subject:	RE:

They took Philippe. Neil, can you tell me were we stand with them?
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shankman, Jeffrey A.
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 1:54 PM
To:	Oxley, David
Cc:	Mcconnell, Mike; Haedicke, Mark E.
Subject:

David,

What is Enron's relationship with the recruiting firm Hiedrick and Struggles?  The are calling around here.

Jeff


Kaye:  Don't worry about credit.  Please focus on confirms/settlements.  Tana
will handle global contracts.  Thanks.  Sara
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 04/13/2000
05:43 PM ---------------------------

Carol St Clair
04/13/2000 03:25 PM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Conference Rooms

Sara and Tana:
FYI.  Please when you know it provide Suzanne with the headcount for the
confirm/settlements program on May 5th and the global contracts program on
May 24th and I will take care of the credit program on May 12th.
Carol
---------------------- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 04/13/2000
03:22 PM ---------------------------

Suzanne Adams
04/13/2000 12:05 PM
To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Conference Rooms

All reserved from 11:30 a.m.-2:00 p.m.

May 5: 30C2
May 12: 30C2
May 24: 46C1
June 16: 30C2

Please let me know how many people will be attending each meeting so I can
order lunch.

Carol St Clair
04/13/2000 11:48 AM
To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Conference Rooms

Suzanne:
Just wanted to confirm before we sent out any invitations that we have the
following rooms reserved:

Friday, May 5th 11:30-2  30th floor
Friday May 12th 11:30-2  30th Floor
Wednesday May 24th 11:30-2  Which room did we get?
Friday, June 16th 11:30-2 30th Floor

Carol


These are works in progress.


The best I've ever had in my whole entire life, anywhere in the world.

Seriously, I think the guests--including me--thought that it was fabulous. I know Prentice finished hers, so I assume she liked it.  Cameron......well, you'll have to ask her.

The mango chutney combined with the curry was, like, death raging, man.

Best,
Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: Nancy Sellers [mailto:Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 11:01 AM
To: Cameron; Jeff Dasovich; Prentice @ Berkeley; Prentice Sellers; Scott
Laughlin
Subject: how was the curry?

Nancy
(707) 251-4870 (phone)
(707) 265-5446 (fax)
"Plus je bois, mieux je chante"


Ben, confirming our conversation earlier today regarding the two items below,

Mark Fisher, a Data Analyst in our Information Services group is available on
Friday March 8, at 1:30 PST to address your questions regarding the
downloading of data from SCADA. Mark and I will contact you in your office at
3:30CST.

Regarding the defective Eickoff gearbox on WTG #79 at Trent Mesa, today EWC
will ship a replacement Flender gearbox to Trent Mesa from our Tehachapi
location. It is our plan to install this gearbox in place of the defective
Eickoff gearbox and return the turbine to operational status as soon as
possible.

Regards

Kurt


Thanks.

	Tana Jones@ECT
	07/25/2000 09:46 AM

		 To: Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: EOL

It is in my "forms" subdirectory, called "questionnaire-umbrella re internet
trading1.doc.

	Brent Hendry@ENRON
	07/24/2000 06:05 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL

Tana,
Mark said you may know where the most current form of EOL legal survey
resides in the system.  Any ideas?
Thanks Brent


Carlos,

Can you help me with several 1031 exchange questions?  I spoke to your office and they thought it best that I address my questions to you directly.

Here is my situation.  I purchased a 32 acre tract in Leander about 8 months ago.  I have a contract to sell the property which should close around July 18th.

I expect to realize a gain of around $400,000.  See calculations below:

Sales price:		2,100,000
Purchase price		1,200,000
Fees&Devel costs	  500,000

Profit			 400,000

The cash generated at the sale will be close to $1 million after repayment of a loan.

I am interested in protecting this gain through a 1031 exchange.

I am already involved in a couple of other real estate transactions that might qualify.

 First, there is a 10 acre tract that was purchased by Bishops Corner, Ltd for $1.15 million six months ago.  I lent the partnership the cash to buy the land with the intent of working with the developer to build a multifamily project.  We could not come to terms for the development, so the partnership was conveyed to me.  The loan still exist.  I am an 80% limited partner.  Another investor is the other limited partner.  We have set up a Corporation to be the general partner.  We intend to develop the property. Is there a creative way to use the land purchase in a 1031 exchange?

Second,  I have a small tract in New Braunfels under contract for $400,000.  I am applying for FHA financing for a 180 unit apartment complex and hope to receive an invitation letter prior to closing.  I would need to place this property in a limited partnership eventually, but is there a way to buy the property hold it in my name long enough to satisfy the IRS then move it to a LP.

If neither of these deals qualify, I would still like to find another piece of property.  My two biggest concerns are tying up too much cash and holding property in my own name.  Is there a way to insure during the 1st year then move a different entity?

Thank you in advance for your help.

Phillip Allen
8855 Merlin Ct
Houston, TX 77055
pallen70@hotmail.com
wk 713-853-7041
hm 713-463-8626


I will be out of the office on Wednesday, January 3.  I am married to an OU
graduate, so we are headed to the Orange Bowl to hopefully see Oklahoma hang
onto their number 1 ranking.  I will be back in the office after lunch on
Thursday, January 4.

My assistant, Patti Thompson (x39106), has phone numbers where I can be
reached.  Please contact Bob Hall at x36956 with any questions while I am
out.


-----Original Message-----
From: Nicolay, Christi L.
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 1:26 PM
To: Kitchen, Louise; Dietrich, Janet; Delainey, David; SMITH, Douglas; Lavorato, John; Black, Don; Forster, David; Duran, W. David; Belden, Tim; Calger, Christopher F.; Foster, Chris H.; Black, Tamara Jae; Aucoin, Berney C. ; Furrow, Dale; Meyn, Jim; Harvey, Claudette; Presto, Kevin M.; Jacoby, Ben
Subject: FW: RTO Week -- Summary of Standards and Practices Panel

FYI.

TJ and Claudette--Please forward to your groups.  Thanks.
-----Original Message-----
From: Rodriquez, Andy
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 4:46 PM

Standardizing Markets, Business, and Other Practices <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />

Panelists for this discussion were:  Sarah Barpoulis, PG&E National Energy Group; William P. Boswell, GISB; Bill Burkes (substituting for David J. Christiano), City Utilities of Springfield, Missouri; David N. Cook, NERC General Counsel; Michael Kormos PJM Interconnection; LeRoy Koppendrayer, Minnesota Public Utilities Commission; and Marty Mennes, Florida Power & Light Company.

 General Observations

 The Commissioners were all present the majority of the time (Massey left late in the  afternoon).  FERC Staff was active in the discussion; however, the commissioners were very active as well, asking perhaps as much as 70% of all questions.  There was a general consensus that standards were needed; much discussion focused simply on how much and by who. The Commission seemed very interested in leaning what they needed to do to move the industry forward and how far they needed to go.  Panelists urged the need to mover forward as quickly as possible, but both they and FERC seemed to recognize that some of the issues regarding standardized market design and such needed to be addressed before RTOs could really begin to move forward.  There was discussion on identifying which industry group (NERC or GISB) would take the reins in the future.  On an interesting tangential note, there was noticeable conflict between NERC and GISB, with veiled insults between the two organizations somewhat common during the discussions.

 FERC Deliverables

A great deal of the discussions focused on identifying what the industry needed from the Commission.  Staffers probed all panelists to find what they felt was critical.

The first major topic was "How many RTOs?  What is their scope?"  All panelists seemed to agree that this question needed to be answered immediately by FERC, in strong definitive language.  N o one offered any specific language, but seemed to be urging FERC to issue a formal statement.

The next topic was, "What will be standard market design?"  Panelists varied on this, but most felt strong guidance from FERC is urgent.  Some urged for one mandatory design for North America, one supported a set of rigid standard designs, one supported a single design with requests for exceptions (followed by an in-depth review process), and one seemed to prefer the current situation.

The commission in general seemed to be very interested in understanding what the industry needed to move forward.  They continually visited this topic throughout their discussions, asking questions like, "Do we need to issue a Mega-Order that addresses all these issues?" and, "How much detail do you need us to provide?"   General feel from the panelsists seemed to be they wanted strong leadership in this areas.  Kormos and Burkes went so far as to say FERC should "Mandate as much as they felt comfortable - and then go a little further."  Others seemed to be a little worried about this idea, but in general did not oppose the concept, citing only general warnings and the need for cautious investigation.

One item of interest: Wood referred to the filing made by the Electronic Scheduling Collaborative and specifically asked if the items identified in the "RTO Design and RTO Implementation" section would address many of the questions and uncertainty facing the industry with regard to RTO design.  Kormos indicated that clear and specific answers to these questions specifying a course of action would go a long way toward guiding the industry.  The section to which Wood referred was one that I wrote, and asked the following questions:

?         Congestion Management - When Operational Security Violations occur, how is the system to be stabilized in a fair and equitable manner that is nonetheless efficient?  Will LMP based systems be standard, or will there be others that must be accommodated?

?         Transmission Service  - Are transmission services required to schedule ("covered" schedules only), or are they risk management tools protecting from congestion charges (both "covered" and "uncovered" schedules are allowed)?

?         Loop Flows  - Are contract-path based or flow-based transmission services appropriate?  If contract-path based, how are parallel path issues to be addressed?

?         Grandfathered Transmission Service - Should contracts existing prior to RTO development be transferred, or is there an equitable way to retire those contracts?  Are there other solutions?

?         Energy Imbalance Markets - How are imbalance markets to function? Will they serve as real-time energy markets (support unbalanced schedules), be limited to supplying needs of imbalance service (require balanced schedules), or will they be required at all?

?         Ancillary Services - Will ancillary service markets be developed in standard ways?  Will entities be required to actually schedule ancillary services (required to schedule), or will they be treated primarily as financial instruments (protecting against real-time POLR charges)?

?         Losses - Can we utilize the imbalance markets to support losses?  Can we create specific loss standards that facilitate the scheduling process, or must we support methods that are currently in tariffs, but technically unwieldy?

?         Non-Jurisdictionals - How are non-jurisdictionals to be integrated into the new world?  Should systems be designed with the assumption that non-jurisdictional will be part of an RTO?  Or should they be designed to treat each NJE as a separate entity?

Hopefully, FERC will use this section as a template to answer these critical questions in an assertive manner, and give some solid direction in which to move. Kormos emphasized the need for concrete answers to these questions, pointing out that vague answers (i.e., "do congestion management") will take a year or two to resolve, but specific answers (i.e., "LMP with financial hedging instruments") will take only months.  The Commission asked Mike about moving forward, and he told them that effectively, it was impossible to move forward with implementation without getting these issues addressed.

Now for a  funny point - One of the commissioners (I think Breathitt) referred to some concerns expressed in the Northwest that their high concentration of hydro power makes LMP inefficient for the Northwest.  Kormos flat out said, "My profession is understanding how power systems work, and I don't believe that that statement is true."  He then backpedaled a bit and said that it would need more study, but he stood by his statement that the assertion by the Northwest interests was false.

NERC and GISB

A great deal of discussion focused around the need for a single standard-setting organization.  Massey went so far as to ask, "Are we looking at a beauty contest between NERC and GISB?"  Cook and Boswell then went into several short polite jabs at each other's organizations.  Other participants continually reiterated the need for ONE, INDEPENDENT organization.  Interestingly, Boswell was very emphatic about the established trust and respect in GISB, while Cook preferred to only talk about the "new" structure of NERC and did not focus on its history.

Brownell offered some not-too-subtle passive support of GISB by pointedly asking both Cook and Boswell if they lobbied political positions (i.e., were they not only an organization but also a stakeholder?).  GISB was easily able to say they were not, but NERC of course had to admit to their romancing of Congress and the Bush administration for reliability legislation. Point, Brownell.

Mennes acted as somewhat of a supporter for NERC, playing Dave Cook's yes-man.  He probably did them a little bit of harm by pointing to NERC's supposed "successes," such as TLR and E-Tag.  If staffers have tenure, they will likely remember that these "successes" have not been so successful, resulting in several filings and interventions.  We may also wish to file comments in specific objection to these claims, to refresh their memory and to show the pretty picture Marty painted was in fact a fiction.

There was a little discussion about splitting reliability and market issues, but general consensus was that I could not be done.  There was also some talk of folding NERC under GISB/EISB.

The arguments began winding down after a some time, and Boswell strongly urged the Commission to speak to industry executives and advocacy group leadership to see whether NERC or GISB should lead the industry forward.  NERC somewhat less enthusiastically supported this position.  In general, I would say it was a close fight but GISB came out more on top.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Andy Rodriquez
Regulatory Affairs - Enron Corp.
andy.rodriquez@enron.com
713-345-3771


Gary,

Any interest?

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/27/2000
09:19 AM ---------------------------

"Vadim Pokhlebkin" <vpokhleb@ideaus.com> on 03/27/2000 09:04:35 AM
To: <vkamins@enron.com>
cc: <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
Subject: Today's IDEA

Good morning Vince,

Attached are today's issues of our daily morning faxes:
1. FMT, Financial Markets Today - good for FX and partly for fixed income
departments,
2. Fixed Income Today - good for bonds people only.

Do you mind if contact your colleagues directly to get their feedback?  That
will save you time  from forwarding this info to them.

Please let me know whom I may contact.

Best regards,
Vadim Pokhlebkin
Account Manager
vpokhlebkin@ideaglobal.com
tel. + 1 212 571 4332
fax  + 1 212 571 4334

IDEAglobal.com
140 Broadway, 21st Floor
New York, NY 10005, USA

Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of
IDEAglobal.com. This email, its content and any files transmitted with it
are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may be legally privileged
and/or confidential. Access by any other party is unauthorized without the
express written permission of the sender. If you have received this email in
error you may not copy or use the contents, attachments or information in
any way. Please destroy it and contact the sender via the IDEAglobal.com
switchboard in one of the following three offices: New York +1 212 571 4332;
London +44 171 430 2888; Singapore +65 332 0700

 - FMT0327A.pdf
 - FIT0327a.pdf


Start Date: 10/18/01; HourAhead hour: 11;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001101811.txt

Error retrieving HourAhead price data - process continuing...
---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 10/18/01
  TIE_POINT: MALIN_5_RNDMTN
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_DUCKS
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM


Morris will be on vacation starting Monday, October 29th - Friday, November 2nd.  He will return on Monday, November 5th.

In the event you need to reach Morris, you may call his cell phone, 713-503-1409.

Debra Young
Enron Transportation Services
Location:  3AC-3287
Tel:  713-853-4799
Cell: 713-504-1900
Fax:  713-646-6116
debra.young@enron.com


g hfbhfgh fg


Susan --

Muchas gracias.  Thanks.

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Lindberg, Susan
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 2:34 PM
To: Nicolay, Christi L.; Steffes, James D.
Subject: FW: EEI Interconnection Project

I'll keep an eye on this.

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Reddy [mailto:Mreddy@epsa.org]
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 2:20 PM
To: acomnes@enron.com; Hawkins, Bernadette; Nersesian, Carin; Nicolay,
Christi L.; Fulton, Donna; Scheuer, Janelle; jhartso@enron.com; Shelk,
John; Jsteffe@enron.com; Noske, Linda J.; Robertson, Linda; Alvarez,
Ray; Shapiro, Richard; Novosel, Sarah; Mara, Susan; Lindberg, Susan;
Hoatson, Tom
Subject: RE: EEI Interconnection Project

MEMORANDUM

TO: Regulatory Affairs Committee
       Power Marketing Working Group

FROM: Jim Steffes, Regulatory Affairs Committee Chair
            Bob Reilley, Power Marketers Working Group Chair
            Julie Simon, Vice President of Policy

DATE: September 17, 2001

RE: EEI Interconnection Project
       ?Conference Call on Friday, September 28th at 11:00 a.m.
        (EDT)

EEI has recently undertaken an effort to draft Model Interconnection Procedures for new generators, along with a pro forma Interconnection and Operating Agreement.  They have recently distributed those documents to EPSA, as well as other industry trade associations, in an effort to get feedback from other industry groups.  It is, however, unclear when EEI's efforts will be shared with the FERC Staff.

The documents, including an Explanation and Commentary on the draft Procedures and Interconnection and Operating Agreement are attached.  EPSA will hold a conference call on Friday, September 28th at 11:00 a.m. (EDT) to discuss our response to EEI so please feel free to forward these documents to those in your company handling interconnection issues.  To access the call, dial 1-800-937-6563.  Ask for the Julie Simon/EPSA Call. If you have any thoughts on the documents before the September 28th conference Call, please contact Julie Simon at jsimon@epsa.org or Jack Cashin at jcashin@epsa.org.

Attachments


John:
FYI.  I've sent them a response which I will send to you.
Carol
---------------------- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 04/14/2000
09:27 AM ---------------------------

Susan Bailey
04/12/2000 05:44 PM
To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: ISDA Amendment btw Enron & TransCanada

Carol,

I had hoped all was well with the First Amendment with TransCanada; however,
they are now requested certain changes.  Therefore, I am forwarding this
message onto you for your review and comments.

Just let me know what is decided so that execution copies can be generated.

Thanks
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT on 04/12/2000 05:44
PM ---------------------------

"Karen Ector" <karen_ector@transcanada.com> on 04/12/2000 05:32:44 PM
To: Susan.Bailey@enron.com
cc:
Subject: ISDA Amendment btw Enron & TransCanada

Susan:

My apologies in advance for causing you more work!

Although TransCanada previously consented to the format of amendment proposed
by Enron, upon closer review of this document, there are certain changes
requires by TransCanada, prior to execution.

E.4.(a) - TEFP will not agree to this point.  Will Enron consider not
including
this language in the amendment?

E.4.(b) - please redraft, so that a Letter of Credit (L/C) may be drawn upon
in
the event of default, only if the L/C holder is owed money.

E.4.(c) - why does Enron want this change?

F. - please redraft so that an L/C may be drawn upon if there is an event of
default, only up to an amount equal to the exposure amount.  Also please
remove
all references to 'transferable' throughout the L/C.

Thank you for your assistance.  Again, I am sorry to have reneged on our
agreement.

Karen


---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 12/06/99 07:37 PM
---------------------------

Brenda L Funk
12/06/99 09:23 AM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Project Ghost Structure

---------------------- Forwarded by Brenda L Funk/HOU/ECT on 12/06/99 09:23
AM ---------------------------

Craig Clark
12/03/99 05:05 PM
To: Brenda L Funk/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Project Ghost Structure

Please find attached the structure for Project Ghost.

Craig


Elizabeth,

Texas and Wellhead were grouped under George.  I adjusted Texas, but not Wellhead.  I also added the market hubs that we trade, under the pipeline section.  Let me know if you have any questions.

D

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Webb, Elizabeth
Sent:	Thursday, October 11, 2001 9:01 AM
To:	Lamadrid, Victor; Kinsey, Lisa; Sullivan, Patti; Jaquet, Tammy; Greif, Donna; Smith, George F.; Olinger, Kimberly S.; Farmer, Daren J.; Calcagno, Suzanne; Williams, Jason (Trading)
Cc:	Superty, Robert; Newton, Lisbet; Garcia, Clarissa; Schrab, Mark L.
Subject:	RE: Logistics PowerPoint presentation

Hi All,

This is just a friendly reminder that I need the information for the Gas Logistics PowerPoint presentation by tomorrow, Friday, October 12th.

Thanks for your time and assistance.   Please call me with any questions.

Thanks,
Elizabeth
x51694
 << File: Gas Logistics PowerPoint1.ppt >>  Presentation is located at O:/Logistics/Management/Presentations/Gas Logistics PowerPoint1.ppt

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Webb, Elizabeth
Sent:	Thursday, October 04, 2001 2:56 PM
To:	Lamadrid, Victor; Kinsey, Lisa; Sullivan, Patti; Jaquet, Tammy; Greif, Donna; Smith, George F.; Olinger, Kimberly S.; Farmer, Daren J.; Calcagno, Suzanne; Williams, Jason (Trading)
Cc:	Superty, Robert; Newton, Lisbet; Garcia, Clarissa; Schrab, Mark L.
Subject:	Logistics PowerPoint presentation

Hi All,

Per the discussion at today's staff meeting, I would like you all to review the attached presentation and put in general information for your particular desk/cost center in the respective slides.   I have one slide for each desk/cost center called " Desk/Cost Center X Information" and another called "Asset Management Deals" if this is applicable to you.

Please return the attached presentation with your additions and/or changes to me by Friday, October 12th.    Please call me if you have any questions or concerns.

Also, please feel free to utilize me as a resource for any PowerPoint presentations, data gathering that you may need done.

Thanks,
Elizabeth

Presentation is located on O:/logistics/management/Gas Logistics PowerPoint1

 << File: Gas Logistics PowerPoint1.ppt >>
Elizabeth Webb
elizabeth.webb@enron.com
713-345-1694


The report named: Violation/Notification Memo <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=60&report_name=Violation/Notification+Memo&category_cd=2&category_name=ENRON%20CONSOLIDATED&toc_hide=1&sTV1=2&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=10/18/2001>, published as of 10/18/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


Attached is the October 25th South American DPR.

Attached is theDaily P/L Summary of  ($    25,000)

South America Trading	              $  166,000

Argentina Power Total:	              $   119,000

	Power Trading
		Rho & Drift	              $     1,000
		Price Actuals		  $     4,000
					 ------------------
				              $     5,000

	Modesto Maranzana Plant
		Rho & Drift		 ($     1,000)
		Oct Actualization Adj	 ($   14,000)
		PMA Sept Actualization	  $  129,000
				             -------------------
				              $  114,000

Brazil Power Total:		 $     59,000

		Rho & Drift		 $       8,000
		Sep O/A Adj CVRD Deal	 $     51,000
		          			-------------------
		Total			 $     59,000

Argentina Gas Total:   	            ($     12,000)

		Intramonth Book:
		Vol Updates 	             ($     1,000)
		Sept Modesto Gas Actual($   11,000)
					-------------------
		Total			($     12,000)

Modesto Maranzana Plant:	 ($   126,000)

		Energy Availability Adj	 ($     31,000)
		Capactiy Availability Adj	 ($     36,000)
		Internal Consumption	 ($       5,000)
		Transmission & PAFTT	 ($     33,000)
		GEI			 ($       4,000)
		Heat Rate Adj		 ($     17,000)
					---------------------
		Total			 ($   126,000)

Modesto Maranzana Plant Mgr:	 ($      66,000)

		Sept Fixed O&M	 ($      66,000)
					---------------------
		Total			 ($      66,000)
Regards,

Patricia Rivera


I'm not sure what this e-mail is in reference to.


_________________________________________________________________

                        F O O L W A T C H
                    Friday, October 13, 2000

benjamin.rogers@enron.com
_________________________________________________________________

REGISTER TO BECOME A FOOL -- GET FREE STUFF!
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=155250
_________________________________________________________________

            Close    Change     %Change

            NOW 50    1,808.22    +67.26    +3.86%
            DJIA     10,192.18   +157.60    +1.57%
            S&P 500   1,374.16    +44.38    +3.34%
            NASDAQ    3,316.77   +242.09    +7.87%

           (Numbers as of 5:00 p.m. ET)

 Sponsored by: MaxRate.com
 Want banks to compete for your CD business? It's fast, It's
 FDIC-insured, and it's just too bad everything in life isn't
 this easy. MaxRate.com, where great CD rates come to you.
 http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=155251

*****************************************************************

FOOL ON THE HILL: WHAT NEXT FOR LUCENT?
 Lucent's running out of chances. Here are some ideas to help it
 get back on track.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=155252

EARNINGS SEASON NEWS
 Find out which companies beat the Street in our redesigned news
 area.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=155253

RULE BREAKER: PERMANENCE IN VOLATILITY
 David Gardner offers some perspective on market volatility in this
 classic Rule Breaker.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=155254

RULE MAKER: CISCO, NORTEL, AND LUCENT
 A Fool explains the differences between these three companies and
 shows how JDS Uniphase fits in.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=155255

FIBER OPTICS: NEW INTERNET REPORT
 As the Internet gets bigger, the need for fiber optics components
 keeps on growing. Get our take on JDS Uniphase, Corning, Lucent,
 Nortel, and more.
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=155256

NOTES FROM A FOOL: BULL OR BEAR, I DON'T CARE
 Jerry Thomas sums up a bi-polar week and takes on the AOL-Time Warner
 merger.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=155257

RADIO SHOW: OUR TAKE ON THE WEEK
 Tom and David Gardner talk about Motorola, Lucent, Gap, Home Depot,
 and more.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=155258

FOOLISH FOUR: FOOLISH FOUR RESEARCH UPDATE
 Ann Coleman shares what's been discovered thus far about the validity
 of the Foolish Four.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=155259

FOOL PLATE SPECIAL: COSTCO ADDS UP ITS Q4 EARNINGS
 Costco's Q4 earnings met lowered expectations. What's ahead for the
 retailer in fiscal 2001?
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=155260

HOT TOPICS: WHAT FOOLS ARE TALKING ABOUT
 What Fools are talking about: Home Depot gets hammered, analysts on Yahoo!,
 and more.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=155261

FRIBBLE: FINANCIAL ADVICE FOR THE YOUNG JEDI
 This Fool credits his solid investing lessons to a mentor who reminds him
 of a Star Wars character.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=155262

BREAKFAST WITH THE FOOL: GATEWAY BUSTS OUT WITH STRONG Q3
 The personal computer maker reported third-quarter earnings after the close
 yesterday, reaffirming its beyond-the-box strategy.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=155263

_________________________________________________________________

My Portfolio: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=155264
My Discussion Boards: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=155265
My Fool: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=155266
Fool.com Home: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=155267
My E-Mail Settings: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=155268

 Sponsored by: MaxRate.com
 Want banks to compete for your CD business? It's fast, It's
 FDIC-insured, and it's just too bad everything in life isn't
 this easy. MaxRate.com, where great CD rates come to you.
 http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=155269

WIRELESS 201: FREE PREVIEW
 Get a sneak peek at this report on Soapbox.com
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=155270

BECOME A FOOL!
 Get a FREE Investing Guide and more...
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=155271

FOOL DIRECT E-MAIL SERVICES
 Need to change your address or unsubscribe? You
 can also temporarily suspend mail delivery.
http://www.fool.com/community/freemail/freemaillogin.asp?email=benjamin.rogers
@enron.com

 Have ideas about how we can improve the Fool Direct or new
 e-mail products you'd like to see? Try our discussion board:
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=155272

_________________________________________________________________
(c) Copyright 2000, The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. This
material is for personal use only. Republication and
redissemination, including posting to news groups, is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of The Motley Fool.

MsgId: msg-23377-B10131333Address.msg-20:03:24(10-13-2000)
X-Version: mailer-sender-master,v 1.84
X-Version: mailer-sender-daemon,v 1.84
Message-Recipient: benjamin.rogers@enron.com


I think that we sent this to the wrong e:mail address at first...
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 08/28/2000 06:00 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Patti Thompson                           08/28/2000 05:26 PM

To: dbeck2land@aol.com, suew2@aol.com, piropos@austinrr.com,
cwhite@texas.usta.com
cc:  (bcc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT)
Subject: Sally's travel Itinerary for Aug 29-31,2000

Itinerary for Sally Beck
ASE Offsite
Dallas, TX
August 29-31, 2000

Tuesday, Aug 29  Continental Flt. CO 701 (Seat 02E)
     6:45 am Depart Houston-IAH
     7:46 am Arrive DFW Int,l

Training Facility  DesignShop
     Cap Gemini Ernst & Young (CGEY)
     Accelerated Solution Environment (ASE)
 One Panorama Center
     7701 Las Colinas Ridge
     Irving, TX 75063
     Phone:  214-303-7700
     Fax:  214-303-7643

Schedule:   Tuesday ) Wednesday:  9:00 AM ) 7:00 PM
     Thursday: 9:00 AM ) 5:00 PM

Hotel:    Sumner Suites
     5455 Green Park Drive (off of Hwy 114)
     Irving, TX  75038
     Phone:  972-550-7400
     Fax:  972-550-7252
     Confirmation #: 18563

Thursday, Aug 31 Continental Flt. CO  (Seat 03A)
    3:25 pm Depart DFW Int,l
    4:35 pm Arrive Houston - IAH


Here is a presentation Don and I have been working on.  I have sent a copy to
Tom Zenner, but please keep this very confidential.  Thank you.
Ben Rogers


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/23/2001
06:03 PM ---------------------------

Maureen Raymond@ENRON
03/23/2001 05:42 PM
Sent by: Gwyn Koepke@ENRON
To: vkaminski@aol.com, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Korea Report


Start Date: 3/4/01; HourAhead hour: 11;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001030411.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 3/4/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_SCOUT
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 3/4/01
  TIE_POINT: SYLMAR_2_NOB
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_SCOUT
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL


Good Afternoon Michelle,

Attached you will find the Sample PWD with the few additions  we are
proposing.  It states payment terms and defines our services.

Please review and respond with any questions to myself or Dave Smith.

Respectfully,

Darlene Donlan
(410) 540-3202
email:  ddonlan@teksystems.com

 - Sample PWD for Enron 101801.doc
 - ddonlan.vcf


Gentlemen. I am writing to let you know that I have recently been appointed
as president and COO of all of GPC's operations ouside of Canada and the US.
So please let me know if I can help in any foreign markets at all. You will
recall my/GPC's work for Enron on Project Stanley here in Canada.

On another matter, If in anyway we can help you on the current situation
regarding market confidence let me know. I would be more than willing to put
together of our  best people in GPC Fleishman Hillard or Omnicom to come
down and brain storm about media relations, investor communications or
anything else.

Good luck.

Tom McLaren
President and COO, International
GPC International
416 598 0055
tom.mclaren@gpcinternational.com
website: http://www.gpcinternational.com

*******************************************************************
This email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper
for the presence of computer viruses

Ce courrier a fait l'objet d'un balayage antivirus au moyen
du logiciel MIMEsweeper
*******************************************************************


FERC issued three CA orders today.  Ray Alvarez sent out a summary on the
order related to increasing Generation and Transmission in the west. The
report below came from IEP's attorney.

Underscheduling -- Enron has been on both sides on this issue -- here's
what's happened

One CA order rejects the requests by PG&E, SoCal Edison and the CAISO to
suspend the underscheduling penalty adopted in the December 15th Order.  The
Commission is currently reviewing data filed by the CAISO in conjunction
with a request to waive the underscheduling and will address the
underscheduling penalty in a future order.  The Order does accept the
CAISO's proposal to split the BEEP stack into Operating Reserves and
Imbalance Energy.

QFs -- Ridgewood Complaint

The second order address QF issues.  Granting, in part, Ridgewood and CCC's
request for emergency relief, the Commission ruled that when QFs sell excess
power or make third party sales as authorized by a court, the California
utilities must provide interconnection and transmission service to make
those sales.  The Commission deferred decision on whether QFs that have not
been fully paid can make third party bilateral sales.

Obstacles -- Subject of Ray's earlier e-mail

The third order addresses obstacles to increased energy supply.  The
Commission takes a number of actions, including allowing premium returns on
equity (200 basis points) and accelerated depreciation (10 years) for
projects that increase transmission capacity in the short term (July 1,
2001).  The basis points go down if the project comes on later.  The order
also allows rolled-in treatment of interconnection and upgrade costs for new
supply, broadens and extends QF waivers of operating and efficiency
standards, waives prior notice requirements and grants market-based rate
authority for sales from back-up and self-generation in WSCC, authorizes
certain demand side sales and management programs, and encourages pipeline
construction projects.

More to follow when we review the orders.

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854


Dear E204-1, E204-2 Students,
I have attached a handout on Inventory Management that parallels my
lectures and the readings (but does not cover some models, like MRP
-- Materials Requirement Planning, which is in the reading handout).
This was requested by class rep Erik Magner.  I have tried to include
all the square roots as  ( ... )1/2  but compare to the formulae in the?readings for accuracy/equivalence.?Regarding Team Assignment #2, "End of Month Cash Balances" refer?to the end of the month AFTER any loan that is needed.  The 0.5% interest?is only earned on the end-of-month cash flow BEFORE the loan, however?(0.5% of any pre-loan positive balance is paid to McGan, and McGan pays?the bank 0.5% of any pre-loan negative cash balance -- in addition to the?1% interest charge on any loan needed).   McGan's end-of-month?cash balance should be at least $250,000 (after any loan) in any month.?These comments refer to the last two bullet-points of Problem 2, p. 3.?--Tom McCullough? - E204_INV_hndout.doc??=======================================================================?Tom McCullough?Senior Lecturer?Haas School of Business?University of California at Berkeley?==========================================================================


Aurora, my changes appear on the attached.
I assume you or AA have updated the numbers for eligible transition costs
(second paragraph of section 7).  (If you have not, I'm really not sure who
would have those numbers)
I updated the numbers for environmental costs in the footnotes.  Please call
(x30596) if you have any questions.


Mr. Schiff,
Attached for your review is the proposed form of Enron Corp. Guaranty, which will guarantee the obligations of Enron North America Corp. and Enron Capital & Trade Resources International Corp. under their respective agreements with Carr Futures Inc.

Stephanie Panus
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3803C
Houston, Texas  77002
ph:  713.345.3249
fax:  713.646.3490
email:  stephanie.panus@enron.com


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Keiser, Kam
Sent:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 3:00 PM
To:	Gossett, Jeffrey C.
Subject:	RE: risk books for December

These are the official post-id's from Dec 31st for all live deals. We didn't have a "performance" book until January.   I included Canada and EMW at the bottom if needed.

Kam

Bankruptcy book
1452831
1452832
1452833
1452834
1452835
1452843
1452839

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gossett, Jeffrey C.
Sent:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 2:43 PM
To:	Keiser, Kam
Subject:	FW: risk books for December

Can you provide the following?

Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Koerselman, Lisa
Sent:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 2:24 PM
To:	Gossett, Jeffrey C.
Subject:	RE: risk books for December

List of the final Post ID for the Estate,Bankruptcy and Performing Post ID's for gas and Power.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gossett, Jeffrey C.
Sent:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 12:15 PM
To:	Koerselman, Lisa
Subject:	RE: risk books for December

What exactly do you need for Dec?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Koerselman, Lisa
Sent:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 10:35 AM
To:	White, Stacey W.; Gossett, Jeffrey C.
Subject:	FW: risk books for December

Do y'all know when the books will be final for December - I had hopes of being able to utilize the people going to UBS, so if you can give me a status I would appreciate it.

thanks
Lisa

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Koerselman, Lisa
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 9:29 AM
To:	White, Stacey W.; Gossett, Jeffrey C.
Subject:	risk books for December

I am following up to see where we stand on the risk books for December.  My understanding is that we will have at least 3 categories:  legally terminated, not performing but not terminated, and still performing.

The deals that are still performing should have liquidations, etc. "as normal" - the remainder will be "frozen" until an amount is settled with the counterparty.

I am inheriting the MTM group and am trying to get as much done before we split with the people going to NETCO, so if you can give me the status and ETA if the books are not done I would greatly appreciate it.

thanks
Lisa

Lisa Koerselman
x-53128


-----Original Message-----
From: Ashley Worthing [mailto:ashleyworthing@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 1:56 PM
To: alr91679@yahoo.com; anne@wcnet.net; bondri01@sprintspectrum.com;
carolynn2@earthlink.net; christi_anna_2000@yahoo.com;
jworthing@insurancenetusa.com; elmo0523@hotmail.com; Cernosek Jr.,
Frank; jennie_sara@hotmail.com; barker_jill@hotmail.com; asst@wcnet.net;
Terhune, Kendra; kristie.l.ketron@us.arthurandersen.com; Ingram, Renee;
nondrias@wharton.isd.tenet.edu; Villalobos, Patricia;
tssmith23@hotmail.com; stephnm76@hotmail.com
Subject: Fwd: FW: Support from around the world

>From: "Worthing, Ashley" <Ashley.Worthing@ENRON.com>
>To: <ashleyworthing@hotmail.com>
>Subject: FW: Support from around the world
>Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 13:43:42 -0500
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Miller, Rebecca (CORP, GEAccess)
>[mailto:rebecca.miller@geaccess.com]
>Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 12:45 PM
>To: Alexis Ley (E-mail); Allison Stephenson (US - Houston) (E-mail);
>Worthing, Ashley; Fag (E-mail); Jennifer Mallozzi (E-mail);
>Lsparkspsi@aol. com (E-mail); Micme76@aol. Com (E-mail); Nicole Palmer
>(E-mail); Vlau@Dynegy. Com (E-mail)
>Subject: FW: Support from around the world
>
>
>If you are like me you have probably gotten a ton of these but I found
>this
>one especially touching.
>Take care
>Becky
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Sturdevant, Dana [mailto:Dana_Sturdevant@aimfunds.com]
>Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 11:35 AM
>To: Gray, Tara; Rexroad, Addie; Braunagel, Amy E; 'Kenley'; 'Amy
>Belcher'; 'Becky'
>Subject: FW: Support from around the world
>
>
>I know we are getting a lot of this kind of thing but I thought this one
>was
>very touching & thought you may enjoy...
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Schulze, Stephanie M
>Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 11:05 AM
>To: 'amber'; 'armstrong'; 'blake'; 'bobby'; 'brent'; 'dad'; Sturdevant,
>Dana; Collins, Darren L; 'emily'; 'eric'; 'gena'; 'hannafin'; 'jamie';
>'jarrett'; 'jason'; 'jay'; Hinze, Jeffrey S.; 'jennifer'; Smith, Jeremy;
>'jessica'; Colquitt, James (Jim) K; 'joe benes'; 'joel'; 'john'; 'jon';
>'josh'; 'julie'; 'kaki'; Schultz, Katherine E; 'kelly'; Ramos, Leslie A;
>'Lisa'; 'lyndsey'; 'matt'; 'melissa'; 'melodee'; Lord, Michael J;
>'miles'; 'misty'; 'molly'; 'mom'; 'nicole'; 'Paul Carrillo';
>Riley-Krugly, Natasha C; 'robby'; 'Roger'; 'scott'; Hutto, Shelby L;
>'smitty'; Parrish, Spencer T.; 'stacey'; Miller, Tiffany A; 'tindall';
>'tony'; 'toohey'; 'travis'; 'troy'; 'truett'; High, Regina; Wooten,
>Ellis L; Alexander, Stacey G; Major, Kristi L; Luangpakdy, Laksany T.
>Subject: FW: Support from around the world
>
>
>
>VERY COOL!!
>
>
>don't let the name of the link fool you.  This is very touching.
>
>
>
>http://killer.gaschamber.net/~tsk/thankyou/
>--
>
>
>
>
>
>
>**********************************************************************
>This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
>and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
>the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
>others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
>authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
>reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
>all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
>intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
>binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
>affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
>relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
>Thank you.
>**********************************************************************

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"Bautista, Larry L." <Larry.Bautista@ElPaso.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Bautista+2C+20Larry+20L+2E+22+20+3CLarry+2EBautista+40ElPaso+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:23 AM
To:	AMY GOLD; AMY SHERIDAN; BARBARA JOST; BARBARA WHITTAKER; BILL LANSINGER; BRUCE CONNELL; CARLA JOHNSON; CATHY BULF; CHRIS SCHINDLER; CRAIG CHANCELLOR; CRAIG LIPKE; CURT BRECHTE; CYNTHIA CORCORAN; DAVE KIRKLAND; DAVID HUARD; DEBBIE SWANSTORM; DEBORAH CARPENTIER; DIANE MCVICKER; DIANE TOM; DONALD G. AVERY; DONNA FULTON; DOUG CANTER; DOUG JOHN; DOUGLAS K. PORTER; ED ROSS; ELISABETH R. MYERS-KERBAL; ELISSA J. GRAMMER; ELIZABETH ZERBY; ELLEN SCHALL; FRANK GURLEY; FRANK LINDH; FREDERICK T. KOLB; GARY DUEDE; GARY VENZ; GEORGETTA BAKER; GORDON SMITH; GREG LANDER; HAROLD ORNDORFF; INGRID OLSON; JACK CASHIN; JAMES MCGREW; JAMES MORIARTY; JAMES TRIFON; Tholt, Jane M.; JANICE ALWARD; JANICE E. ROGERS; JAY GOLUB; JEFF E. PARKER; JEFF GOFORTH; JIM ADAMS; JIM DOERING; JOEL L. GREENE; JOHN COGAN; JOHN FLOOM; JOHN GREGG; JOHN P. ARMATO; JOHN P. BEALL; JOHN R. LILYESTROM; JOHN R. STAFFIER; Jonathan Bromson; JOSEPH S. KOURY; JUNE SUWARA; KARILEE RAMALEY; KATHIE EDWARDS; KATHLEEN L. MAZURE; KELLY A. DALY; KENT PRICE; KIM M. CLARK; KIRBY BOSLEY; KURT L. KRIEGER; L.W. SMITH; LARRY BLACK; LAURIE J. HAMILTON; LINDSEY HOW-DOWNING; LUIS MANUEL PADILLA; MARK FENTON; MELISSA MAXWELL; MIKE LANGSTON; MIKE MCELRATH; NORMAN PEDERSEN; PATRICK NEVINS; Paul B. Mohler; PAUL GENDRON; PAUL KEELER; PAULA CRUNKILTON; PEDRO SERRANO, JR.; PENNY BARRY; PERRY BROWN; PETE FROST; PETER CERVIN; RANDALL RICH; Cantrell, Rebecca W.; ROB DAVIS; ROBERT GRAY; ROBERT HEWLETT; ROBERT PETROCELLI; ROBERT PETTINATO; SALLE E. YOO; SANDRA E. RIZZO; SANDRA ROVETTI; SARAH TOMALTY; SCOTT MERTZ; SCOTT WALTON; SEAN BREEN; SHARON ROYKA; STEVE LEVINE; STEVE TARPEY; SUSAN GINSBERG; SUSAN JONES; TED MCMURTRIE; TERRI DICKERSON; THOMAS CUBBAGE; TIM MILLER; TOM CARLSON; VIRGIL SPURGEON
Cc:	Tomlinson, Robert T.; Derryberry, Richard L.; McCleskey, Michael L.; Healy, William
Subject:	RP00-336 Data Responses

Attached below are El Paso's responses to the data requests resulting from
the capacity allocation technical conference held on August 28, 2001.

 <<Citizens Ltr.doc>>  <<Citizens No. 1.xls>>  <<Citizens No. 2.xls>>
<<Enron 01.xls>>  <<Enron Ltr.doc>>  <<EPMCG Ltr.doc>>  <<FERC1 ltr.doc>>
<<Staff No. 01.xls>>  <<Ind. Shippers Ltr.doc>>  <<PNM ltr..doc>>  <<PNM No.
01.xls>>  <<SRP ltr..doc>>  <<SRP No. 05.doc>>  <<SRP No. 13.xls>>  <<SWG
ltr..doc>>  <<SWG No. 5.xls>>

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender.
******************************************************************

 - Citizens Ltr.doc
 - Citizens No. 1.xls
 - Citizens No. 2.xls
 - Enron 01.xls
 - Enron Ltr.doc
 - EPMCG Ltr.doc
 - FERC1 ltr.doc
 - Staff No. 01.xls
 - Ind. Shippers Ltr.doc
 - PNM ltr..doc
 - PNM No. 01.xls
 - SRP ltr..doc
 - SRP No. 05.doc
 - SRP No. 13.xls
 - SWG ltr..doc
 - SWG No. 5.xls


if there's anything you want me to change (technologies to add, things to highlight), let me know


David has sent us a memo re: Procedures for Approval to trade in Australia
that I think you will find helpful.
---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 03/31/2000 08:02 AM
---------------------------

David Minns@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
03/31/2000 01:58 AM
To: Heidi Mason/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Paul Smith/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Paul
Quilkey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, David Forster/LON/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones@ECT, Mark Taylor@ECT, Susan Musch/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: EnronOnline procedures and GTCs

Attached are the GTCs that I have revised to address tax issues that would
arise from counterparties with no Australia presence. I am content settlement
provisions already covered in the documentation. I have also developed a
checklist for new counterparties. Would you pass onto Chris Catt at PW for
his signoff.