My understanding of AB1890 is that it says that:
The price paid by DA customers shall not be more than the frozen tariff.
And the CPUC has implemented this by creating the Px credit equal to the
current market.

This interpretation has been supported by months of practice and lots of
hearings (if that means anything).

So my interpretation is that although the AB1890 does not explicity require
Px credits to be based on market it does require the total effect to be that
the DA customers not pay more than the frozen rates; which the CPUC
previously interpreted in the only logical method available - that there
needs to be a credit equal to the market value of commodity on the customers
bill.  This give the CPUC the latitude to change the Px but requires them to
add some other credit that brings the rates down to 1996 rates if they
deviate from it.

So although I agree that the bill does not force Px to be equal to market
value, I think it does force it to be equal to market value given the
structure that they have assumed.

Scott

MDay <MDay@GMSSR.com> on 04/20/2001 04:52:58 PM
To: "'Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com'" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>, sstoness@enron.com
cc: Harry.Kingerski@enron.com, JBennett <JBennett@GMSSR.com>,
Leslie.Lawner@enron.com, tjohnso8@enron.com, Susan.J.Mara@enron.com, MDay
<MDay@GMSSR.com>
Subject: RE: SCE Advice Filing on PX Credit -- Protest

Jeff is correct that AB 1890 said NOTHING about direct access credits, said
nothing about whether such credits were to be market based, or whether
direct access customers were to be indifferent to their choice of power
providers.  All of the direct access credit rules were developed by the CPUC
in their approval of the direct access tariff rules (Rule 22) and in their
implementation of the utility cost recovery plans (the calculation of CTC).
Therefore, we cannot protest the PE advice letter on that basis.  We can
still argue for the DJ indexes as a more appropriate substitute for a PE
credit based just on Edison's cost of generation (retained generation plus
QFs plus DWR purchases) but we have to recognize that it the number is
higher than the PE credit, we will be effectively asking for a subsidy to
direct access providers from the utility's bundled customers.  I do not
expect us to succeed in obtaining that subsidy.  The bottom up tariff
structure is a much more likely result at this point.  Mike Day

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 2:26 PM
To: sstoness@enron.com
Cc: Harry.Kingerski@enron.com; JBennett; Leslie.Lawner@enron.com;
tjohnso8@enron.com; Susan.J.Mara@enron.com; MDay@GMSSR.com
Subject: Re: SCE Advice Filing on PX Credit -- Protest

Looks good, Scott.  One thing:  I admit I'm not a lawyer, so someone needs
to show me the precise language in AB 1890 that 1) requires the credit
(which, I believe was created by the PUC, not the legislature) to be based
on market and 2) requires DA customers to be indifferent to be from DA
suppliers.

Mike Day:  Do you concur with Scott's interpretation in AB 1890?

Like your arguments, Scott.  Just want to clarify that we're on solid legal
ground before putting the arguments foreward in a brief and/or protest.

Best,
Jeff

                    Scott

                    Stoness@EES          To:     JBennett
<JBennett@GMSSR.com> @ ENRON
                                         cc:     Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Tamara
                    04/20/2001           Johnson/HOU/EES@EES, Leslie
Lawner/HOU/EES@EES,
                    10:46 AM             Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron

                                         Subject:     Re: SCE Advice Filing
on PX Credit
                                         -- Protest(Document link: Jeff
Dasovich)

We should protest this issue and argue that nothing should change but that
   the Px credit should be based on DJ-NP15 and DJ-SP15 rather than the
   defunct Px because AB1890 requires it to be based on market (not costs).
   Changing to procured energy is inconsistent with the law AB1890 which
   requires DA customers to be indifferent to buying from DA suppliers.
   And since DA suppliers face costs close to DJ-NP15/SP15, that is the
   only appropriate available method.

Further, the issue of how to calculate Px is interrelated to whether DA
customers should be charged the generation surcharges ($10 +$30).  DA
customers should be given market based Px credits (based on DJNP15/SP15)
because its the law.  There are 2 possible interpretations resulting from
the combination of AB1890 and the new law.
   The DA customers should get a market based Px credit and not pay any
   surcharge.
   The DA customers should get a market based Px credit and pay the $30 +
   $10 surcharges
Interpretation 1 results in DA customers getting lower rates than all other
customers.  It seems unlikely that the legislation would have this intent.
Interpretation 2 results in DA customers getting the same rate as all other
customers until the end of AB1890.  This seems like the likely
interpretation since otherwise the new legislation would have repealled
AB1890.  Thus given that the DA customers are being held indifferent to
frozen rates plus $40, they should get a Px market based credit plus pay
the surcharge until the rate freeze ends.

Once the Px credit ends (Mar 2002), the surcharge should end because the
law (AB1890) no longer requires them to be held at frozen rates and
because:
   Any customer that is being served by a supplier other than DWR and the
   utility is not causing any costs for DWR or the utility therefore they
   should not be charged for them.

In the event that Px credit is not set based on market value (if the courts
interpret the law differently than Enron) then there should be no
generation surcharge for DA customers.

This is the same argument we should make in our brief on rate setting

Scott

JBennett <JBennett@GMSSR.com> on 04/20/2001 09:03:06 AM

To:   "Harry Kingerski (E-mail)" <Harry.Kingerski@enron.com>, "Robert
      Neustaedter (E-mail)" <Robert.Neustaedter@enron.com>, "Scott Stoness
      (E-mail)" <sstoness@enron.com>, "Tamara Johnson (Business Fax)"
      <IMCEAFAX-Tamara+20Johnson+40+2B1+20+28713+29+20345-7374@GMSSR.com>
cc:   "Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)" <jdasovic@enron.com>, "Sue Mara (E-mail)"
       <smara@enron.com>
Subject:  SCE Advice Filing on PX Credit -- Protest

As you are aware, SCE made an advice filing on April 5th to eradicate the
PX
Rate Schedule and Replace it with Schedule PE --Procured Energy.  As part
of
the filing, SCE proposes to set "on an interim basis" the cost of energy
procurement, for bundled service customers for billing purposes and in the
calculation of the energy credit for direct access customers equal to the
Generation rate component of the Customer's otherwise applicable tariff.

Two primary issues arise from SCE's statement. First what does "interim
basis" mean -- how long will this be in effect.  In starts on January 19th,
but it is unclear as to when it would end. Second, and most important. is
what is meant by the Generation rate component.  While there is not much
explanation in the April 5 advice letter, in a subsequent advice letter
filed on April 11 (1533-E), SCE set forth "Rate Schedule Specific
Generation
Related Rates" which range between five and nine cents.

I have forwarded both the referenced advice letters to you earlier.  We
need
to protest the change in the PX credit by Wednesday, April 25th.  All
thoughts on the matter are welcome.

Jeanne


The Enron policy for our English law Master is for arbitration - although I
have to say, for purely financial contracts, I myself always prefer the
Courts.

Kind regards

Mark

Sara Shackleton
04/05/2000 01:00
To: Mark Elliott/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: ISDA Agreements governed by English law

Mark:  Thanks so much for your explanation earlier today.  Just one more
question, please:  is arbitration or litigation the preferance under English
law?  How often do you negotiate to the contrary?  Thanks.  Sara


Happy Birthday!!
What did you get?

DG

---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 04/25/2001
08:16 AM ---------------------------

"hollyw" <hollyw@email.msn.com> on 04/24/2001 03:32:58 PM
To: "Gary Wright" <wrightgr@udmercy.edu>, "Stacy Warren"
<swarre02@coair.com>, "Stan & Katie Wright" <stanchas@aol.com>, "Sheri
Thomas" <Sheri.Thomas@enron.com>, "Rochelle Smith"
<rochelle@waterengineers.com>, "Mom&Dad\(Lake\) \(E-mail\)"
<rjones@mcia.com>, <KSowada@aol.com>, "KRISTI GIRON"
<KRISTI.GIRON@cfisd.net>, "kristiandjoel" <kandjhenness@webtv.net>, "Ron
Jones" <jonesr@tpi-sourcing.com>, "John Schmitz"
<john.schmitz@rlxtechnologies.com>, "Debbie Hall" <gmind@icsi.net>, "Charlene
Anderson" <foxter@rionet.com.br>, "Diego Gotthelf" <dygotthelf@hotmail.com>,
"Dana Smith" <dsmith@s3ccpa.com>, "Darron C Giron"
<Darron.C.Giron@enron.com>, "Quais" <catherine_morse@amat.com>
cc:
Subject: Holly 48

Stacy, I see you as more of an over 60, except for the admiration part.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Warren, Stacy" <swarre02@coair.com>
To: "Mom&Dad(Lake) (E-mail)" <rjones@mcia.com>; "Ugly Boo (E-mail)"
<hollyw@email.msn.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 2:19 PM
Subject: I Rule - 51

This is a fun diversion.

Take this test for yourself...and send it to your friends, including me, and
let them know who you are. My score is in the subject box... Don't peek but
begin the test as you scroll down and answer.

Answers are for who you are now...not who you were in the past.   Have pen
or pencil and paper ready.   This is a real test given by the Human
Relations Dept at many of  the major corporations today. It helps them get a
better insight concerning their employees and potential employees.

It's only 10 simple questions, so...  Grab a pencil and paper, keeping track
of your letter answers.   Make sure you change the subject of the e-mail to
read YOUR total. When you are finished, forward this to everyone you know,
and also send  it to the person who sent this to you.

Make sure to put YOUR score in the subject box.  Ready?? Begin...

1. When do you feel your best?
 a) in the morning
 b) during the afternoon & early evening
 c) late at night

2. You usually walk
 a) fairly fast, with long steps
 b) fairly fast, with short, quick steps
 c) less fast head up, looking the world in the face
 d) less fast, head down
 e) very slowly

3. When talking to people you
 a) stand with your arms folded
 b) have your hands clasped
 c) have one or both your hands on your hips
 d) touch or push the person to whom you are talking
 e) play with your ear, touch your chin, or smooth
your hair

4. When relaxing, you sit with
 a) your knees bent with your legs neatly side by side
 b) your legs crossed
 c) your legs stretched out or straight
 d) one leg curled under you

5. When something really amuses you, you react with
 a) a big, appreciative laugh
 b) a laugh, but not a loud one
 c) a quiet chuckle
 d) a sheepish smile

6. When you go to a party or social gathering you..
 a) make a loud entrance so everyone notices you
 b) make a quiet entrance, looking around for someone
you know
 c) make the quietest entrance, trying to stay
unnoticed

7. You're working very hard, concentrating hard, and
you're interrupted. Do you..
 a) welcome the break
 b) feel extremely irritated
 c) vary between these two extremes

8. Which of the following colors do you like most?
 a) red or orange
 b) black
 c) yellow or light blue
 d) green
 e) dark blue or purple
 f) white
 g) brown or gray

9. When you are in bed at night, in those last few
moments before going to sleep, you lie

 a) stretched out on your back
 b) stretched out face down on your stomach
 c) on your side, slightly curled
 d) with your head on one arm
 e) with your head under the covers

10. You often dream that you are
 a) falling
 b) fighting or struggling
 c) searching for something or somebody
 d) flying or floating
 e) you usually have dreamless sleep
 f) your dreams are always pleasant

POINTS:
 1. (a) 2
     (b) 4
     (c) 6

 2. (a) 6
     (b) 4
     (c) 7
     (d) 2
     (e) 1

3. (a) 4
 (b) 2
 (c) 5
 (d) 7
 (e) 6

4. (a) 4
 (b) 6
 (c) 2
 (d) 1

5. (a) 6
 (b) 4
 (c) 3
 (d) 5
 (e) 2

6. (a) 6
 (b) 4
 (c) 2

7. (a) 6
 (b) 2
 (c) 4

8. (a) 6
 (b) 7
 (c) 5
 (d) 4
 (e) 3
 (f) 2
 (g) 1

9. (a) 7
 (b) 6
 (c) 4
 (d) 2
 (e) 1

 10.(a) 4
 (b) 2
 (c) 3
 (d) 5
 (e) 6
 (f) 1

Now add up the total number of points.
OVER 60 POINTS:
Others see you as someone they should "handle with
care." You're  seen
as
vain, self-centered, and who is extremely dominant.
Others may admire
you,
wishing they could be more like you, but don't always
trust you,
hesitating to become too deeply involved with you.

 51 TO 60 POINTS:
Others see you as an exciting, highly volatile, rather
impulsive
personality; a natural leader, who's quick to take
decisions,  though not
always the  right ones. They see you as bold and
adventuresome, someone
who will try anything once; someone who takes chances
and enjoys an
adventure.  They enjoy being in your company because
of the excitement you
radiate.

41 TO 50 POINTS:
Others see you as fresh, lively, charming, amusing,
practical, and
always interesting; someone who's constantly in the
center of attention,
but sufficiently well-balanced not to let it go to
their head. They also
see you as kind, considerate, and understanding;
someone who'll always
cheer  them up and help them out.

31 TO 40 POINTS:
Others see you as sensible, cautious, careful &
practical. They see you
as clever, gifted, or talented, but modest... Not a
person who makes
friends too quickly or easily, but someone who's
extremely loyal to
friends you do make and who expect the same loyalty in
return. Those who
really get to  know you realize it takes a lot to
shake your trust in your
friends, but equally that it takes you a long time to
get over it if
that trust is ever broken.

21 TO 30 POINTS:
Your friends see you as painstaking and fussy. They
see you as very
cautious, extremely careful, a slow and steady
plodder. It'd really
surprise them if you ever did something impulsively or
on the spur of the
moment,  expecting you to examine everything carefully
from every angle
and then, usually decide against it. They think this
reaction is caused
partly by your careful nature.

UNDER 21 POINTS:
People think you are shy, nervous, and indecisive,
someone who needs
looking after, who always wants someone else to make
the decisions & who
doesn't want to get involved with anyone or anything.
They see you as a
worrier who always sees problems that don't exist.
Some people think
you're boring. Only those who know you well know that
you aren't.

Now forward this on to everyone you know, making sure
to put YOUR score
in the subject box.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/


David,

You asked me to provide my opinion about the employment agreement provisions relating to target bonus amounts that are based on performance.

The bonus language contained in the majority of the agreements with a target bonus is as follows:

	"Provided that Enron meets its earnings targets and provided that Employee is rated within the top 25% of the performance criteria under Enron's annual performance rating system or its equivalent for the calendar year in question, Employee's annual bonus amounts under the Plan for calendar years 2001, 2002, and 2003 (payable in 2002, 2003, and 2004, respectively), shall be based on an annual bonus target of $_____________."

This language does not address a person's performance as compared to one's peers, but instead looks at the number of performance criteria and requires that a person be in the top 25% of those criteria.  Thus, if there are only 3 rating categories (i.e., 1, 2, 3, distributed as 10-80-10), then only the people in the top category would be within the top 25/33% of the rating criteria.

Given the huge change in our process, however, there is an argument that the above language cannot be applied to the current scheme and that instead, we should look at the top 25% of the peer group, instead of performance criteria, even though that was not the intent of the provision when it was drafted.

As a result, I would suggest that the middle category be divided further into either 2 or 3 subcategories (i.e., 2A, 2B, or 2C).  That way, persons who fall out in categories 1 or 2A would be eligible for the target bonus.  If there is a decision not to break  down the middle 80 further, then it would be useful to look at those employees with a bonus target that we think is too high. For those employees, a more conservative approach may be to evaluate them on a scale that is more subdivided than the 10-80-10 breakdown and to document that they fell out in the bottom 75% of the categories under that process.

Of course, it goes without saying that we should ensure consistent treatment based on race, sex, national origin, age, etc. in this process.

Please let me know if you have any questions.


The cancer journey is sometimes lonely and frustrating for both those suffering with the disease and those providing care. But it can also be a time of friendship, personal growth, humor, and fulfillment.

Please join Marlene Lockey, Sr. Social Work Counselor at MD Anderson Cancer Center on Wednesday, August 15, 2001 at 11:30 a.m. in the Forum in 2AC (12th floor) for a Brown Bag session on "Caring for the Caregiver." Marlene has many stories to share, as well as many ways to cope with the challenges of living with cancer.  The presentation will be followed by an audience discussion, so please bring your questions and experiences.  Contact Laura Herrera -laura.herrera@enron.com  - if you would like to attend.

In addition to the brown bag session, MD Anderson Cancer Center will be hosting a two-day conference entitled "Living Fully With Cancer," September 6-8, 2001.  For more information on the conference, please call MD Anderson at (713) 792-2553 or toll free at (800) 345-6324.

Cancer is the nation's No. 1 health concern. How much do you really know about the disease? Find out by taking the American Cancer Society - Discovery Health Channel quiz <http://health.discovery.com/tools/quiz/acs/cancer_quiz.html>. Then learn how to reduce your risk of cancer by viewing a new series of informational ads <http://health.discovery.com/convergence/acs/acs.html> now showing on the Discovery Health Channel.

Do you have cancer or know someone who does? There's hope.  Call MD Anderson today.


Hi Guys

As promised, please see attached list of current active EnronOnline
counterparties (as of 10th June).

Regards

Amita

---------------------- Forwarded by Amita Gosalia/LON/ECT on 12/06/2000 23:06
---------------------------

Amita Gosalia
12/06/2000 22:23
To: Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Diana
Higgins/LON/ECT@ECT, Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janine Juggins/LON/ECT@ECT, Andrew Cornfield/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron, Bruce Garner/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lara
Fields/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Dilworth/LON/ECT@ECT, Nick Mooney/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Counterparties to whom metals products will be available

Hi Guys

Slight change of plan on the counterparty front - we will be offering all
metals products (currently two phys products) to the following counterparties:

- All companies on new "A" list  (see Enron aluminium list.doc and Enron
copper list.doc below)
- All companies on the old "A" list (where we have a PA for the countries
they are trading from)  (see tif file below)
- All exisiting companies on EnronOnline (list as in EOL - copy will be
forwarded as soon as avail)

Please be aware that the companies on the new "A" list may be a subset of the
companies on the old "A" list.

Please proceed with your review process on the basis of the above.

Both "A" lists are attached below for your ease of reference.

Regards

Amita

 - Enron aluminium list.doc
 - Enron copper list.doc

  Old A list


See attached summary of 1/8 meeting with Dennis Thompson, Don Hollingsworth's
Special Projects Director.


I'll make you a promise. READ THIS E-MAIL TO THE
END! - follow what it says to the letter - and you
will not worry whether a RECESSION is coming or
not, who is President,or whether you keep your
current job or not . Yes, I know what you are
thinking. I never responded to one of these before
either. One day

though, something just said "you throw away $25.00
going to a movie for 2 hours with your wife".
"What the heck." Believe me, no matter where you
believe "those feelings" come from, I thank
goodness every day that I had that feeling. I
cannot imagine where I would be or what I would be
doing had I not. Read on. It's true. Every word
of it. It is legal. I checked. Simply because you
are buying and selling something of value.

AS SEEN ON NATIONAL TV:

Making over half a million dollars every 4 to 5
months from your home.

THANKS TO THE COMPUTER AGE AND THE INTERNET !
==================================================
BE AN INTERNET MILLIONAIRE LIKE OTHERS WITHIN A
YEAR!!!

Before you say ''Bull'', please read the
following. This is the letter you have been
hearing about on the news lately. Due to the
popularity of this letter on the Internet, a
national weekly news program recently devoted an
entire show to the investigation of this program
described below, to see if it really can make
people money. The show also investigated whether
or not the program was legal.

Their findings proved once and for all that there
are ''absolutely NO Laws prohibiting the
participation in the program and if people can
"follow the simple instruction" they are bound to
make some mega bucks with only $25 out of pocket
cost''. DUE TO THE RECENT INCREASE OF POPULARITY &
RESPECT THIS PROGRAM HAS ATTAINED, IT IS CURRENTLY
WORKING BETTER THAN EVER.

This is what one had to say: '' Thanks to this
profitable opportunity". I was approached many
times before but each time I passed on it. I am so
glad I finally joined just to see what one could
expect in return for the minimal effort and money
required. To my astonishment, I received a total $
610,470.00 in 21 weeks, with money still coming
in''. Pam Hedland, Fort Lee, New Jersey.
==================================================
Another said: "this program has been around for a
long time but I never believed in it. But one day
when I received this again in the mail I decided
to gamble my $25 on it. I followed the simple
instructions and walaa ..... 3 weeks later the
money started to come in. First month I only made
$240.00 but the next 2 months after that I made a
total of $290,000.00. So far, in the past 8 months
by re-entering the program, I have made over
$710,000.00 and I am playing it again. The key to
success in this program is to follow the simple
steps and NOT change anything.'' More testimonials
later but first, =======

==== PRINT THIS NOW FOR YOUR FUTURE REFERENCE ====
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

If you would like to make at least $500,000 every
4 to 5 months easily and comfortably, please read
the following...THEN READ IT AGAIN and AGAIN !!!

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

FOLLOW THE SIMPLE INSTRUCTION BELOW AND YOUR
FINANCIAL DREAMS WILL COME TRUE, GUARANTEED!

INSTRUCTIONS:

===Order all 5 reports shown on the list below===

For each report, send $5 CASH, THE NAME & NUMBER
OF THE REPORT YOU ARE ORDERING and YOUR E-MAIL
ADDRESS to the person whose name appears ON THAT
LIST next to the report. MAKE SURE YOUR RETURN
ADDRESS IS ON YOUR ENVELOPE TOP LEFT CORNER in
case of any mail problems.

===WHEN YOU PLACE YOUR ORDER, MAKE SURE === ===YOU
ORDER EACH OF THE 5 REPORTS! === You will need all
5 reports so that you can save them on your
computer and resell them. YOUR TOTAL COST $5 X 5 =
$25.00.

Within a few days you will receive, via e-mail,
each of the 5 reports from these 5 different
individuals. Save them on your computer so they
will be accessible for you to send to the 1,000's
of people who will order them from you. Also make
a floppy of these reports and keep it on your desk
in case something happens to your computer.

IMPORTANT - DO NOT alter the names of the people
who are listed next to each report, or their
sequence on the list, in any way other than what
is instructed below in step '' 1 through 6 '' or
you will loose out on the majority of your
profits. Once you understand the way this works,
you will also see how it does not work if you
change it. Remember, this method has been tested,
and if you alter it, it will NOT work !!! People
have tried to put their friends/relatives names on
all five thinking they could get all the money.
But it does not work this way. Believe us, some
have tried to be greedy and then nothing happened.
So Do Not try to change anything other than what
is instructed. Because if you do, it will not work
for you. Remember, honesty reaps the reward!!!
This IS a legitimate BUSINESS. You are offering a
product for sale and getting paid for it. Treat it
as such and you will be VERY profitable in a short
period of time.

1.. After you have ordered all 5 reports, take
this advertisement and REMOVE the name & address
of the person in REPORT # 5. This person has made
it through the cycle and is no doubt counting
their fortune.

2..Move the name & address in REPORT # 4 down TO
REPORT # 5.

3.. Move the name & address in REPORT # 3 down TO
REPORT # 4.

4.. Move the name & address in REPORT # 2 down TO
REPORT # 3.

5.. Move the name & address in REPORT # 1 down TO
REPORT # 2

6.... Insert YOUR name & address in the REPORT # 1
Position.

PLEASE MAKE SURE you copy every name & address
ACCURATELY! This is critical to YOUR success.

==================================================
**** Take this entire letter, with the modified
list of names, and save it on your computer. DO
NOT MAKE ANY OTHER CHANGES.

Save this on a disk as well just in case if you
loose any data. To assist you with marketing your
business on the internet, the 5 reports you
purchase will provide you with invaluable
marketing information which includes how to send
bulk e-mails legally, where to find thousands of
free classified ads and much more. There are 2
Primary methods to get this venture going:

METHOD # 1: BY SENDING BULK E-MAIL LEGALLY
==================================================

Let's say that you decide to start small, just to
see how it goes, and we will assume You and those
involved send out only 5,000 e-mails each. Let's
also assume that the mailing receives only a 0.2%
(2/10 of 1%) response (the response could be much
better but let's just say it is only 0.2%). Also
many people will send out hundreds of thousands e-
mails instead of only 5,000 each). Continuing with
this example, you send out only 5,000 e-mails.

With a 0.2% response, that is only 10 orders for
report # 1. Those 10 people responded by sending
out 5,000 e-mail each for a total of 50,000. Out
of those 50,000 e-mails only 0.2% responded with
orders. That's=100 people responded and ordered
Report # 2.

Those 100 people mail out 5,000 e-mails each for a
total of 500,000 e-mails. The 0.2% response to
that is 1000 orders for Report # 3.

Those 1000 people send 5,000 e-mail each for a
total of 5 million e-mail sent out. The 0.2%
response is 10,000 orders for Report # 4.

Those 10,000 people send out 5,000 e-mails each
for a total of 50,000,000 (50 million) e-mails.
The 0.2% response to that is 100,000 orders for
Report # 5.

THAT'S 100,000 ORDERS TIMES $5 EACH = $500,000.00
(half a million dollars).

Your total income in this example is: 1..... $50 +
2..... $500 + 3..... $5,000 + 4..... $50,000 +
5.... $500,000 .... Grand Total=$555,550.00

NUMBERS DO NOT LIE. GET A PENCIL & PAPER AND
FIGURE OUT THE WORST POSSIBLE RESPONSES AND NO
MATTER HOW YOU CALCULATE IT, YOU WILL STILL MAKE A
LOT OF MONEY!
==================================================

REMEMBER FRIEND, THIS IS ASSUMING ONLY 10 PEOPLE
ORDERING OUT OF 5,000 YOU MAILED TO. Dare to think
for a moment what would happen if everyone or half
or even one 4th of those people mailed 100,000 e-
mails each or more? There are over 150 million
people on the Internet worldwide and counting,
with thousands more coming on line every day.
Believe me, many people will do just that, and
more!

METHOD # 2: BY PLACING FREE ADS ON THE INTERNET
==================================================

Advertising on the net is very, very inexpensive
and there are hundreds of FREE places to
advertise. Placing a lot of free ads on the
Internet will easily get a larger response. We
strongly suggest you start with Method # 1 and add
METHOD #2 as you go along. For every $5 you
receive, all you must do is e-mail them the Report
they ordered. That's it. Always provide same day
service on all orders.

This will guarantee that the e-mail they send out,
with your name and address on it, will be prompt
because they can not advertise until they receive
the report.

===========AVAILABLE REPORTS ====================
The reason for the "cash" is not because this is
illegal or somehow "wrong". It is simply about
time. Time for checks or credit cards to be
cleared or approved, etc. Concealing it is simply
so no one can SEE there is money in the envelope
and steal it before it gets to you.

ORDER EACH REPORT BY ITS NUMBER & NAME ONLY.
Notes: Always send $5 cash (U.S. CURRENCY) for
each Report. Checks NOT accepted. Make sure the
cash is concealed by wrapping it in at least 2
sheets of paper. On one of those sheets of paper,
Write the NUMBER & the NAME of the Report you are
ordering, YOUR E-MAIL ADDRESS and your name and
postal address.

PLACE YOUR ORDER FOR THESE REPORTS NOW :
==================================================
REPORT# 1: 'The Insider's Guide To Advertising for
Free On The Net

Order Report #1 from:
J. Pfetzing 2103
Cherrycove Maryland Hgts., MO. 63043
USA
__________________________________________________

REPORT # 2: The Insider's Guide To Sending Bulk
Email On The Net

Order Report # 2 from:

Enchia Resources
590 Centerville Rd. #299
Lancaster , PA. 17538 USA

__________________________________________________

REPORT # 3: Secret To Multilevel Marketing On The
Net

Order Report # 3 from :

Len Rickert
P. O. Box 1040 Nerang Qld 4211
Australia
__________________________________________________

REPORT # 4: How To Become A Millionaire Using MLM
& The Net

Order Report # 4 from:

Peter Mueles
14464 Woodbridge Lane
Savage, MN. 55378
USA
__________________________________________________

REPORT #5: How To Send Out One Million E-mails For
Free

Order Report # 5 From:

R. Elroy
5995 Airport Road
PO Box 500
Boulder Junction, WI. 54512-0500
USA

__________________________________________________
$$$$$$$$$ YOUR SUCCESS GUIDELINES $$$$$$$$$$$

Follow these guidelines to guarantee your success:

=== If you do not receive at least 10 orders for
Report #1 within 2 weeks, continue sending e-mails
until you do.

=== After you have received 10 orders, 2 to 3
weeks after that you should receive 100 orders or
more for REPORT # 2. If you did not, continue
advertising or sending e-mails until you do.

**Once you have received 100 or more orders for
Report # 2, YOU CAN RELAX, because the system is
already working for you, and the cash will
continue to roll in ! THIS IS IMPORTANT TO
REMEMBER: Every time your name is moved down on
the list, you are placed in front of a Different
report.

You can KEEP TRACK of your PROGRESS by watching
which report people are ordering from you. IF YOU
WANT TO GENERATE MORE INCOME SEND ANOTHER BATCH OF
E-MAILS AND START THE WHOLE PROCESS AGAIN. There
is NO LIMIT to the income you can generate from
this business !!!

=================================================

FOLLOWING IS A NOTE FROM THE ORIGINATOR OF THIS
PROGRAM: You have just received information that
can give you financial freedom for the rest of
your life, with NO RISK and JUST A LITTLE BIT OF
EFFORT. You can make more money in the next few
weeks and months than you have ever imagined.
Follow the program EXACTLY AS INSTRUCTED. Do Not
change it in any way. It works exceedingly well as
it is now.

Remember to e-mail a copy of this exciting report
after you have put your name and address in Report
#1 and moved others to #2 .....# 5 as instructed
above. One of the people you send this to may send
out 100,000 ormore e-mails and your name will be
on every one of them. Remember though, the more
you send out the more potential customers you will
reach. So my friend, I have given you the ideas,
information, materials, and opportunity to become
financially independent. IT IS UP TO YOU NOW !

=============MORE TESTIMONIALS===============

'' My name is Mitchell. My wife, Jody and I live in
Chicago. I am an accountant with a major U.S.
Corporation and I make pretty good money. When I
received this program I grumbled to Jody about
receiving ''junk mail''. I made fun of the whole
thing, spouting my knowledge of the population and
percentages involved. I ''knew'' it wouldn't work.
Jody totally ignored my supposed intelligence and
a few days later she jumped in with both feet. I
made merciless fun of her, and was ready to lay
the old ''I told you so'' on her when the thing
didn't work. Well, the laugh was on me! Within 3
weeks she had received 50 responses. Within the
next 45 days she had received total $ 147,200.00
........ all cash! I was shocked. I have joined
Jody in her ''hobby''. Mitchell Wolf M.D.,
Chicago, Illinois

================================================

'' Not being the gambling type, it took me several
weeks to make up my '' Not being the gambling
type, it took me several weeks to make up my mind
to participate in this plan. But conservative as I
am, I decided that the initial investment was so
little that there was just no way that I wouldn't
get enough orders to at least get my money back''.
'' I was surprised when I found my medium size
post office box crammed with orders. I made
$319,210.00 in the first 12 weeks. The nice thing
about this deal is that it does not matter where
people live. There simply isn't a better
investment with a faster return and so big''. Dan
Sondstrom, Alberta, Canada

=================================================

'' I had received this program before. I deleted
it, but later I wondered if I should have given it
a try. Of course, I had no idea who to contact to
get another copy, so I had to wait until I was e-
mailed again by someone else.........11 months
passed then it luckily came again...... I did not
delete this one! I made more than $490,000 on my
first try and all the money came within 22
weeks''. Susan De Suza, New York, N.Y.

=================================================

'' It really is a great opportunity to make
relatively easy money with little cost to you. I
followed the simple instructions carefully and
within 10 days the money started to come in. My
first month I made $ 20, 560.00 and by the end of
the third month my total cash count was $
362,840.00. Life is beautiful, Thanx to the
internet''. Fred Dellaca, Westport, New Zealand

=================================================

ORDER YOUR REPORTS TODAY AND GET STARTED ON YOUR
ROAD TO FINANCIAL FREEDOM !

=================================================
If you have any questions of the legality of this
program, contact the Office of Associate Director
for Marketing Practices, Federal Trade Commission,
Bureau of Consumer Protection, Washington, D.C.

=================================================

ONE TIME MAILING, NO NEED TO REMOVE

=================================================

This message is sent in compliance of the proposed
bill SECTION 301, paragraph (a)(2)(C) of S. 1618.
Further transmission to you by the sender of this
email may be stopped at no cost to you by sending
a reply to: coho2@ziplip.com with the word REMOVE
in the subject line. This message is not intended
for residents in the State of Washington,
screening of addresses has been done to the best
of our technical ability.


I received a fax in yesterday, so I'll review it.

Kay

From: Ben Jacoby/ENRON@enronXgate on 06/04/2001 12:05 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Fred Mitro/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:

Subject: FW: Midway Toll term sheet & LOI - comments

In a seperate e-mail, I sent out the LOI to TECO which incorporated most of
Fred's comments. On the tolling term sheet, I agree with Fred's comments. Kay
- where do we stand on having outside counsel review this? I have indicated
to TECO that we will have a draft tolling term sheet to them by Wednesday.
Please let me know.

Thanks,

Ben

-----Original Message-----
From: Mitro, Fred
Sent: Fri 6/1/2001 5:56 PM
To: Mann, Kay; Jacoby, Ben
Cc: Kellermeyer, Dave
Subject: Midway Toll term sheet & LOI - comments

Ben/Kay:

Attached are my comments on the Midway Tolling term sheet and LOI.

I will be out on Monday but will have my cell phone on.  My conversations
will be regularly interrupted by golf strokes, but I will do my best to be
available.

Call me if you have specific questions/issues to discuss.  I have asked Dave
Kellermeyer to call either one of you on Monday with an answer to the minimum
block size for the tolling term sheet.  I am taking the air permit home to
review and will leave you a message if I determine the answer.

Fred

 <<Kay Mann Term sheet June 1(fred's marked).doc>>

 <<Kay Mann Tolling Term sheet June 1(Fred'smarked).doc>>


I have adjusted deal 452491 for mtr 20014903.  We agree with Lone Star's
billling.

D
---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 03/08/2001
10:49 AM ---------------------------

Daren J Farmer
03/07/2001 12:24 PM
To: Megan Parker/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Tenaska IV Transport 10/00

Megan,

I have changed the pricing on deals 452491 and 452475 for October flows to
mtr 25000200.  These flows should be priced at $.10 + 1/2 % fuel.  The $.11
that Lone Star billed us is incorrect on the last deal.  I'm not sure about
the rates for mtr 20014903.  The person who can tell us should be in
tomorrow.  I will leave a note for her.  We should have similar deal tickets
for Dec forward.  I will check with Mark and Trisha.

D

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Megan Parker @ ENRON                           02/26/2001 12:51 PM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Tenaska IV Transport 10/00

Have you been able to work out these transport pricing differences for Oct.
2000?  We have only been able to pay $4,000.00 of the $28,000.00 invoice.
The pricing for Nov. 2000 (deal 452491) has problems too.  We have $0.01 for
11/3 at meter 20014804 and TXU is billing us $0.10 at meter 25000200 and
$0.02 at meter 20014903 for the entire month.

I have also noticed that we are not accruing any transport for Dec 2000
forward.  We have received the Dec. 2000 invoice from TXU, but we do not have
a deal to pay them.  We should be getting Jan. 2001 next week.  Is there a
deal for these months?

Megan
---------------------- Forwarded by Megan Parker/Corp/Enron on 02/26/2001
12:28 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Megan Parker                           01/05/2001 04:12 PM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Tenaska IV Transport 10/00

I took a look at the transport for TXU Lone Star for Tenaska IV for 10/00.
We mostly have price differences, but one deal needs some days added.  Let me
know if you need copies of the invoices.  The meters below are delivery
meters.  I wasn't sure what the receipt meters would be.

Deal 452491, Meter 20014903  Need to add days 24-26 and 28-31
     Need to check rate - We show $0.01 and we were billed $0.02

Deal 452491, Meter 25000200  Need to check rate - We show $0.02 and we were
billed $0.10

Deal 452475, Meter 25000200  Need to check rate - We show prices from $0.005
to $0.02
      and we were billed $0.11

Thanks,
Megan


call me!!!!  i am so bored!


Easter is good for us.


Talked to Pat Mason.  Give a call when you get a chance.

Jeff


Attached is the Sullivan & Cromwell backghround memo.

Stacy Carey
Policy Director
International Swaps and Derivatives Association
600 5th Avenue, 27th Floor
Rockefeller Center
New York, NY  10020
(212) 332-1202 ph
(212) 332-1212 fax
(917) 543-9622 cell
scarey@isda.org

 - gpm5177.pdf


A question already? No rest for the weary.  Yes there are maps that will fit
in the cube.  I have one at my desk that you can copy.  Thanks
Ben


Hi Mom,

Things are a little better here for me, Friday was a horrible day, we had layoffs of about 30% of our office.  Lots of crying and sadness on the floor.   The weekend was strange, Dave came back from Eugene un announced which was not what we agreed to, and I got the feeling that he was thinking he was going to 'catch' me doing something or having someone over.  He is still really struggling with the idea that I just can't love him like a wife anymore, and that is not enough to keep two people together.  I wish that I could make this easier on him, and I almost think that if I had been unfaithful it would be easier for him to accept.

I am just trying to hold on until he gets some kind of income so that we can sell the house and pay our debt. I do not have any desire for him to be forced to live with his parents, I wouldn't wish that on anyone. Just pray for him and for me.

School sounds wonderful, I am so glad you are happy dealing with your little ones. How fun!

I love you!

Cara


I expect to be here.  713 276 7374.  Maybe a win tonight for a change....

KSC

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 6:00 PM
To: Culotta, Kenneth
Subject: RE: Tampa Electric

I know a couple of their lawyers from a prior transaction (Doug Turner and
their GC, whose name I've now forgotten).  Don't know who they will have on
this one.

I'm off to the Astros, but would like to visit with you tomorrow, if you
will be around.

Thanks,

Kay

"Culotta, Kenneth" <KCulotta@KSLAW.com> on 05/22/2001 05:36:41 PM

To:   "Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com>, "'C. Kay Mann (E-mail)'"
<Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:  RE: Tampa Electric

Kay

I'm looking forward to working with you on this.  I wonder who opposing
inhouse counsel is at TECO?

KSC

> -----Original Message-----
> From:         Keffer, John
> Sent:         Tuesday, May 22, 2001 5:17 PM
> To:           C. Kay Mann (E-mail)
> Cc:           Culotta, Kenneth
> Subject:           Tampa Electric
>
> Kay-we have no conflict with Tampa Electric.  Gracias

Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not
the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.


I'm sending you a series of E-mails from FERC asking for responses to data
requests.  Please read them and call me with any questions: 503-464-8862
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 09/14/2000 04:51 PM
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Brian Harrington" <brian.harrington@ferc.fed.us>
     09/12/2000 08:17 AM

To: <chris.stokley@enron.com>, <mary.hain@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Response to FERC Data Request for Bulk Power Investigation

Thank you for your timely response to FERC's data request.  To date, I have
received responses to questions 2-8.  The only oustanding items are responses
to question #1 and a portion of #4 (unit identifier).  It is understood that
the responses for #1 will be availalbe after September 15 and the additional
information for #4 will be available this week.  We will look over your
responses and call you if clarification or additional information is
necessary.  We will treat as you requested #2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 as Confidential.

You were correct is responding only to the WSCC.  We did not purovidea
separate data requests to Enron Wind.  In not doing so, what information are
we missing from our data requests?  Please e-mail me a response to this
questions.  For any other concerns please continue to use e-mail or contact
me at 202-208-2493.

Thanks!


Below is the final report I plan to run on our progress in monitoring and tracking completed mid-year written evaluation forms across the North American employee base (who were a part of the PRC process). The results remain disappointing and I would again ask for your assistance in encouraging your direct reports to complete and send a copy of the final evaluation forms to their HR reps. Please note the below illustrates forms registered back on employees personnel files and also that the support employees are shown under their related BU headings:

ENRON WHOLESALE SERVICES	Total	On file

	Enron Americas	1079	548	50.8%
	Enron Broadband Services, Inc	822	385	46.8%
	Enron Canada Corp	107	67	62.6%
	Enron Engineering & Operational Services	968	407	42.0%
	Enron Global Markets	363	170	46.8%
	Enron Industrial Markets	192	122	63.5%
 	Enron Net Works	1561	1011	64.8%
	Enron Wholesale Services	13	1	7.7%
	Wholesale EES	35	31	88.6%

 	EWS - Consolidated	5140	2742	53.3%

ENRON TRANSPORTATION SERVICES
 	ETS - Consolidated	1259	483	*38.4%

ENRON GLOBAL ASSETS AND SERVICES
 	ENE Asia-Pacific/Afr/Ch LLC	70	38	54.3%
	Enron Caribbean Basin LLC	46	20	43.5%
	Enron India LLC	25	9	36.0%
	Enron South America LLC	28	10	35.7%

 	EGAS - Consolidated	169	77	45.6%

ENRON ENERGY SERVICES
 	Broadband Networks Construction	36	1	2.8%
	EES North America, Inc.	229	62	27.1%
	Enron Energy Services Operations	1302	867	66.6%
	Integrated Process Technology	156	133	85.3%

 	EES  - Consolidated	1723	1063	61.7%

ENRON CORP
 	ECM Treasury	98	39	39.8%
 	Enron Corp.	1120	662	59.1%
	Enron Investment Partners	7	2	28.6%
	Enron Management, Inc	21	5	23.8%
	Enron Property & Services	58	49	84.5%

 	Enron Corp. - Consolidated	1304	757	58.1%

*ETS did not require written evaluations for all staff.


Please handle
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/HOU/EES on 03/10/99 05:51
PM ---------------------------

Sherri Reinartz@ENRON
03/03/99 05:37 PM
To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Maureen McVicker/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: One more thing...

SK - I let Sherri know that you are planning to go and that I have it on your
calendar.  mm

Steve, I believe we discussed your attendance at the April 15-17 NAM board
meeting at Loews Ventana Canyon (Tucson, AZ), in so far as Jeff is not
available these dates.  Please confirm that you are attending in his place,
and I'll forward the information he received today.  Sorry - my memory is
getting worse by the minute!  SRS


ENJOY!


I have an 8:40 am eye doctor appointment tomorrow morning.  SS


Kate,

You wrote:
"Question #2 - The third choice says "Neither party can more than the
other." I'm not sure if I understand this, or if there's a word missing.
Question on the supply and demand on textbooks, parts B and C. One questions
states "What price does not seller receive?" Again, I'm not sure whether you
mean the price that the seller does NOT receive or if "not" is an mistakenly
placed word."

I am sorry about the typos.  I will give you credit for those problems.

Scott


Dear Zhiyun and Norman:

Due to legal reasons we are in the process of changing deals with delivery point of WestWing to either WestWing 230KV or WestWing 500KV.  However, in PortCalc if the delivery point is changed to WestWing 230KV or WestWing 500KV the deals will be valued against WSCC-S curve, not WestWing curve.  Due to this we have observed unfavorable prior day and curve shift; this is not what our traders expected and wanted the deals to be valued.  An example is deal#802862.1 in which delivery point was changed from WestWing to WestWing 500KV on 10/5/01 and we suffered a $294K loss due to the deal change.  (post id 13377 on 10/5/01 vs. post id 13337 on 10/4/01)

We would like the deals to be still looking at WestWing curve when delivery points are WestWing 230KV or WestWing 500KV.  Please change the mapping of the valuation in PortCalc so the traders can get their deal change and "unreal" curve shift back.

Please let me know your timeline on this and if you have any questions.

Thanks,

Fran
503.464.7973


This is the price Prebon quoted to Mike tonight - he'll be checking in the
morning to see what the spread should have been.

Thanks,
Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
04/10/2001 03:23 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: deal 577823

Mike Driscoll
deal 577823
Prebon shows price as $97.95 ....enpower has $79.95


As faculty advisor to the Finance Club, Prof. Barb Ostdeik is encouraging
all members to take advantage of a great opportunity to learn more about
trading operations from two very respected individuals in the industry.
Keith Anderson of BlackRock, Inc (JGSM 1983) and Dexter Senft of Lehman
Brothers & TradeWeb LLC (Rice 1974) have visited the Jones School to give
this lecture and students have raved about them. Albert Wang's Fixed Income
and Advanced Investments classes are required to attend, and James Weston
recommends for his Applied Finance students and any first years taking
Investments next year to be there.

When:
9:45 a.m. d 11:15 a.m.
Wednesday
April 18

Where:
Room 117
Herring Hall

Presentation/Discussion Topics:
Trading Tactics d phone trades vs. electronic trading
Evolution of e-trading in fixed income markets
The future of the trading desk
Buy-side vs. Sell-side issues

Speaker Profiles:

Keith Anderson, Managing Director and Chief Investment Officer, Fixed Income
of BlackRock, Inc., is co-head of the Fixed Income Operating Committee,
Chairman of the Investment Strategy Group and a member of BlackRock,s
Management Committee.   Mr. Anderson is responsible for global fixed income
strategy, asset allocation and the overall management of client portfolios.
He coordinates a team of thirty-two portfolio managers and more than
twenty-five credit and quantitative analysts.

Mr. Anderson is a member of the Treasury Borrowing Advisory Committee, which
meets quarterly in Washington, D.C. with the Secretary and Staff of the U.S.
Treasury to advise them on the financing and management of the Federal debt.

Prior to founding BlackRock in 1988, Mr. Anderson was a Vice President in
Fixed Income Research at The First Boston Corporation, working in mortgage
securities and derivative products strategies.  Mr. Anderson with Criterion
Investment Management Company where he had primary responsibility for a $2.8
billion fixed income portfolio.

Mr. Anderson has authored numerous articles on fixed income strategies,
including two articles in The Handbook of Fixed Income Options: "Scenario
Analysis and the Use of Options in Total Return Portfolio Management" and
"Measuring, Interpreting, and Applying Volatility within the Fixed Income
Market".

Dexter Senft is a Managing Director with global responsibility for Fixed
Income electronic commerce for Lehman Brothers. During his eight years at
the firm, he has also managed or co-managed Lehman,s Fixed Income Research,
Quantitative Research, Counterparty Credit and Global Economics departments.

Mr. Senft is the former Chairman of TradeWeb LLC, a consortium-owned
electronic bond trading system whose volume currently averages over $10
billion per day, and of which Lehman Brothers is a founding shareholder. He
remains on TradeWeb,s Board, and chairs TradeWeb,s trading protocol
committee, which oversees the rules that govern the electronic flow of
information within the system.

Mr. Senft also serves on the Bond Market Association,s Committee for
Alternative Trading Systems, as well as its Online Bond Steering Committee
and he chairs the subcommittee on e-commerce protocols and standards.

Prior to EJV, Mr. Senft spent 17 years at The First Boston Corporation (now
part of CS First Boston), where he was a Managing Director and head of Fixed
Income Research and Product Development. He is a widely published author of
articles on mortgage securities, fixed income derivatives, and quantitative
portfolio management, and his work continues to be among the readings for
CFA applicants. In 1983, Mr. Senft led the product team that created the
first CMO for Freddie Mac.

This is regarding the e-trading/bond market session
arranged for April 18.  As part of the 1st year finance elective, you may
have already been informed by James Weston (Were you?) but I need to get
the info out to more 2nd years as well.

Do you usually send out your speaker announcements to all faculty,
students, and staff?

Albert Wang's Fixed Income and Advanced Investments classes are required to
come and James Weston will be encouraging 1st years that took the finance
elective to come.

These guys are pretty good - they came a few years back.

Thanks.

bbo


As I mentioned earlier to Mark, Jeff Girth of the NYT again today contacted
Lee Sachs about Enron.  You recall Lee was Asst Secretary of Treasury for
Financial Markets during the Clinton Administration.  From his conversation,
Lee reports the following items were raised by Girth:  a) the state of energy
trading products and investment climate; b)  Enron's role in this market; c)
whether and how financial energy products drive pricing and supply of
physical energy products (Lee told him emphatically no); and, c) whether
government regulators understand these issues.  Lee said this is clearly an
Enron specific story.  Lee thinks Girth came away from the conversation with
more of a right perspective (namely that these are important markets and that
we play a vital role).  Lee said that Girth was less focussed on passage of
the CEA and the politics than Girth had been in an earlier conversation;
almost all  of today's conversation was forward looking.  Girth told Lee that
he had not told Lee "all" that is behind this story, but did say that there
is an interesting twist (Lee thinks Girth perhaps something specific either
on a document front or source).   Lee gave Girth a list of experts to talk to
who are unbiased but clearly right thinking on the subject.  Lee suggested
that Girth to:  Pat Parkinson at the Fed (the godfather of the "hands off"
regulatory perspective for the OTC market), Bill Rainer, and Ed Rosen (a
prominent attorney in NY).  Lee expects Girth to keep calling him.


Cathy,

Will Shankman be able to attend that one?  Liz

From: Cathy Phillips on 02/26/2001 02:16 PM
To: Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Weekly Budget Meetings In March

Hi Liz -

Mike McConnell should be available to attend all of the weekly budget
meetings with the exception of the meeting on March 13th.  Mike will be on
Spring Break vacation that week.

Thank you.

Cathy P.
X-36898

	Greg Whalley
	Sent by: Liz M Taylor
	02/22/2001 01:25 PM

		 To: Peggy McCurley/Enron@EnronXGate, Tina Spiller/Enron@EnronXGate, Loretta
Brelsford/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Connie
Blackwood/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sue Ford/Enron@EnronXGate,
Marsha Schiller/Enron@EnronXGate, Cathy Phillips/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer
Burns/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly Hillis/Enron@EnronXGate, Tammie
Schoppe/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Weekly Budget Meetings In March

Greg Whalley has requested weekly budget meetings during the month of March.
The meetings are scheduled for every Tuesday @ 3:00 p.m. in EB3321, for one
hour, beginning March 6 and ending March 27.  Please advise if your executive
can not attend.

Many Thanks,

Liz Taylor


Leslie --

Please let me know what you need to get this issue properly defined by EES.  One option, maybe, would be to take the customers back to sales service.  Would there be any problems with this?  Please let me know.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lawner, Leslie
Sent:	Wednesday, September 12, 2001 10:57 AM
To:	Kingerski, Harry; Steffes, James D.
Subject:	FW: Southwest Gas

FYI. Apparently we turned back sales customers in Arizona served by Southwest Gas but we are still on the hook for their gas costs.  Altho I was in contact with EES virtually daily since December on about the SW problems, I was told that we were able to terminate their contracts, and was not aware of the lingering exposure issue on pricing until I started getting emails last week.  Needless to say I am not pleased and EES is trying to find a regulatory fix to this problem.  If I had known about it last winter, I would have been able to explain it to them.  I don't think I can get this fixed, and they should have kept the customers, as the delivery problems cleared up in the spring.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lawner, Leslie
Sent:	Wednesday, September 12, 2001 9:52 AM
To:	Sullivan, Colleen
Subject:	RE: Southwest Gas

On cash-outs, Southwest takes the highest price paid for any incremental volume and applies it to all cash out volumes.  This is the issue we took up at the ACC and argued that it should be based on actual costs, not the single highest price.  BUT this is a different issue than the actual cost of gas for sales purposes.  I would think that the sales gas is based on actual incremental costs.  There is a possibility this can be audited, but we would have to go to the ACC, and as in California, they will not be at all sympathetic to us. They will view this an Enron problem.  I just say that so that you don't think that I can fix this easily (I doubt that I can fix this at all, but let's see what we get from the ACC on the cash out issue, that will be a good indicator.  We were clearly right on that one).

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sullivan, Colleen
Sent:	Wednesday, September 12, 2001 8:13 AM
To:	Lawner, Leslie
Subject:	RE: Southwest Gas

Leslie-
Is there any way to know what their incremental cost of gas is or how it is calculated?  For example, if SW Gas buys 10,000 MMBtu total for the month at $5.00 and all other purchases were at $3.00, and EES' sales gas for that month was 90,000 MMBtu, can they charge $5.00 for all 90,000?  Are there any audit rights?  Also, I heard that we hired a law firm awhile back to address this issue???  Do you know anything about that or what they did/accomplished?  You may be hearing more about this from Don Black or Jess Hewitt--there is a huge concern about our exposure this winter.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lawner, Leslie
Sent:	Monday, September 10, 2001 4:04 PM
To:	Shireman, Kristann
Cc:	Sullivan, Colleen
Subject:	RE: Southwest Gas

Under 3.2 of its Transportation Tariff, a SW Gas transportation customer in Arizona who returns to sales will pay the higher of the Gas Commodity Cost (plus any adjustments) or the incremental cost of gas, for a period of 12 months, and then the customer will go back to the PGA.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shireman, Kristann
Sent:	Monday, September 10, 2001 3:07 PM
To:	Lawner, Leslie
Cc:	Sullivan, Colleen
Subject:	RE: Southwest Gas

We are trying to determine the cost of gas for the customers we have turned back to SWG in Arizona.
Thx
Kris S

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lawner, Leslie
Sent:	Monday, September 10, 2001 2:51 PM
To:	Shireman, Kristann
Subject:	Southwest Gas

I assume you found the Southwest Gas Nevada tariff online and checked that rate schedules there?  the commodity cost was $.49390 and there is also a balancing account adjustment.  They file to change their PGA once a year and this year they have proposed no change.


Tracie,

Many thanks for the attachments.  They were most helpful and I was able to complete my task.

Thanks again,

Susan Bailey
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	McCormack, Tracie
Sent:	Thursday, January 17, 2002 7:02 AM
To:	Bailey, Susan
Subject:	Last of the attachments
Importance:	High

 << File: RWE Trading GmbH1.pdf >>  << File: STATOIL UK.pdf >>  << File: TXU Europe BV.pdf >>  << File: TXU Europe Energy Trading Limited.pdf >>


---------------------- Forwarded by Joe Quenet/NA/Enron on 12/12/2000 01:24
PM ---------------------------

rebecca.quenet@eds.com on 12/12/2000 12:17:40 PM
To: joe.quenet@enron.com
cc:

Subject: A friend wanted you to see this!

Rebecca wanted you to see the story
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/business/DailyNews/power_market001212.html
from ABCNEWS.com.


Shelly:
I received your e-mail regarding this years Super Saturday's.  I am currently
an Associate, but as an Analyst I participated in a couple of Super
Saturday's, but haven't done any in a little while, so I wanted to offer up
my services.  Please let me know if there is anything I can do, because I'll
be more than happy to help out again.  Thanks!
Ben


I need for you to find out how much the balance on your tv is - and let me
know


Dear Market Participant,

Technical Bulletin # 49 - Multi-pass methodology of Security
Constrained Unit Commitment - was revised to conform with
changes resulting from the implementation of virtual bidding.
For your convenience, redlined and clean copies of the revised
Technical Bulletin are attached.

The purpose of our Technical Bulletins is to facilitate participation
in the NYISO by communicating various NYISO concepts,
techniques, and processes to Market Participants before they
can be formally documented in a NYISO manual.

If you have any questions, please call your Customer Relations
representatve or the Help Desk at 518-356-6060.

Peter Lemme
NYISO Customer Technical Services
plemme@nyiso.com

(See attached file: TB 49_revised_1_28_02.pdf)(See attached file: TB
49_revised_1_28_02_redline.pdf)
 - TB 49_revised_1_28_02.pdf
 - TB 49_revised_1_28_02_redline.pdf
---
You are currently subscribed to nyiso_tie as: paul.d.thomas@enron.com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-nyiso_tie-629431H@lyris.nyiso.com


I'll look at it on the plane and talk to you tomorrow.  DF

Michael Moran
11/28/2000 04:51 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Cleaned up Capacity System LOI

FYI. After you review we can discuss.
---------------------- Forwarded by Michael Moran/GPGFIN/Enron on 11/28/2000
04:46 PM ---------------------------

Julia White
11/28/2000 04:44 PM
To: Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Steve Hotte/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Shelley
Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Danny McCarty/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Michael
Moran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Cleaned up Capacity System LOI

This is the latest draft from Julie for your review. I realize we will
discuss at the staff meeting on Monday.

Thanks. Julia
---------------------- Forwarded by Julia White/ET&S/Enron on 11/28/2000
04:39 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Julie A Gomez @ ECT                           11/28/2000 12:04 PM

To: Julia White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Cleaned up Capacity System LOI

Dear Julia-

Here is the cleaned up version of what I sent you the other day.

Please let me know your comments ASAP.

Thanks,

Julie  :-)


How many deals have you done????

"Junek, Daniel" <DJunek@aeglobalmarkets.com> on 05/14/2001 01:08:49 PM
To: "'chris.germany@enron.com'" <chris.germany@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:

Chris
 This in my new email address


Mark -

I have a legal question for you.  I was told recently that Carol St Clair was
going to help support the West Trading desk on physical transactions.  Since
she came from the financial legal group I was wondering if she would be able
to help with financial transactions as well.  I feel there are synergies to
having the same Enron lawyer represent us for both the EEI and ISDA.  A
recent example of this could be the SMUD relationship.  Carol recently
completed an amendment to the existing ISDA and now is looking at sending
them a EEI.  The SMUD credit and legal personnel are the same so the process
should be quite smooth.  I was interested in your thoughts on this.  You can
reach me by phone (503-464-3810) or email.  Thanks.

Stewart


As you finalize the personnel issues, any information regarding which trader will be managing each location is extremely helpful.  The reason for this is because we must apply the trader to the appropriate product(s) in order to test the system completely.  Using the information you provide, we will be able to make sure the traders are set up correctly prior to our go-live date.

Kevin

-----Original Message-----
From: Presto, Kevin M.
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 8:50 PM
To: Meredith, Kevin
Subject: RE: Books

I don't have this finalized yet until final personnel decisions are done.

-----Original Message-----
From: Meredith, Kevin
Sent: Fri 1/25/2002 3:30 PM
To: Presto, Kevin M.
Cc: Walker, Chris; Lozano, Melba
Subject: FW: Books

Kevin,

Please identify which trader will be managing the locations you have listed below so we can have the system fully tested as soon as possible.  I understand that we will be using peak and off-peak only for the locations below.  We will work with the trader of the Ontario location and Leslie Hansen to develop this location, as we do not have anything in the system for this yet.  Thanks, in advance, for your response.

Kevin

-----Original Message-----
From: Forster, David
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 3:12 PM
To: Denny, Jennifer; Meredith, Kevin
Subject: FW: Books

Please ensure products are set up accordingly.

Thanks,

Dave
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)

-----Original Message-----
From: Presto, Kevin M. <Kevin.M.Presto@ENRON.com>
To: Webb, Jay <Jay.Webb@ENRON.com>; Forster, David <David.Forster@ENRON.com>
CC: Evans, Casey <Casey.Evans@ENRON.com>; White, Stacey W. <Stacey.W.White@ENRON.com>
Sent: Wed Jan 16 14:36:59 2002
Subject: FW: Books

The UBSW Energy on-line products should be limited to the locations below through 2003 only.   Off-Peak markets will be only in NY, PJM, NEPOOL, and ERCOT.

*       NEPOOL PTF
*       NY Zone J (FP and Basis)
*       NY Zone G
*       NY Zone A
*       Ontario (FP and Basis)
*       PJM East Hub (FP and Basis)
*       PJM West Hub
*       PJM West (Basis)
*       Cinergy
*       Com-Ed (FP and Basis)
*       TVA (FP and Basis)
*       Entergy (FP and Basis)
*       SOCO
*       ERCOT South (FP)
*       ERCOT North (Basis)

Casey - Please see above the markets that will be Fixed Price (1-30 day market) and Basis/Spread (forwards).

Kevin Presto
Vice President, East Power Trading
Phone:  713-853-5035
Cell:  713-854-3923
Fax:  713-646-8272


FYI.............
I changed the time of the meeting to be from 10:00 a.m to 11:00 a.m..........

Please plan to attend this meeting to review the SBS/storage allocations issues and develop resolution plans.


---------------------- Forwarded by Rob G Gay/NA/Enron on 02/21/2001 11:48 AM
---------------------------

Rob G Gay
02/21/2001 09:55 AM
To: Tracee Bersani/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Tanslation of Furnas letter

---------------------- Forwarded by Rob G Gay/NA/Enron on 02/21/2001 05:18 AM
---------------------------

Jose Bestard@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
02/20/2001 04:01 PM
To: jgardine@skadden.com, Michelle
Blaine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cuiaba LT
cc:

Subject: Tanslation of Furnas letter

See the translation of Furnas  response of Feb 8.

1) They are not signing the Consent.

2)  Questions the FM claim

3) Raises the need to come up with tariff for a period not initially
contemplated in the Contract (This needs to be done irrespective of the
Consent issue)

4) Questions the Economic equilibrium revision if not approved be Aneel

5) Raises MAE exposure for the project

---------------------- Forwarded by Jose Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
02/20/2001 03:50 PM ---------------------------

"MLN - Mila Leite Nascimento" <Mln@tozzini.com.br> on 02/20/2001 12:59:44 PM
To: <john.novak@enron.com>, <Jose.Bestard@enron.com>
cc: "CEB - Cl?udia Bonelli" <CEB@tozzini.com.br>

Subject: Dear Sirs,

Dear Sirs,

As requested, please find attached the translation of the letter received by
Mr. Laine Powell from Furnas on February 8, 2001, which refers to the EPE
letter of January 29, 2001.
If you need any clarification, please contact us.

Best Regards,

Mila L. Nascimento

 - FURNLET.DOC


From casual observations, I cannot dispute your ratings.   I do feel that
Dave needs to step up to the plate and start delivering some new and creative
solutions for outstanding issues.  He has the capabilities.   It seems he
tends to manage too much by wandering around and not taking the lead.

I fully support Barney's rating, but could see both Dave and Larry's ratings
being on the lower edge of the recommended ratings.

I will do all I can to shore up the organization by placing some expectations
for improvements before the whole group and dividing up the accountabilities
accordingly.

I fully support what you have recommended.

Rod Hayslett

12/12/2000 01:53 PM
To: Morris Brassfield/OTS/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Ratings

 Brasher  Excellent
 Clements Strong
 Fenstad Satisfactory

These are my thoughts based upon general knowledge of the year and some
specifics for the last few months.     A short discussion with Phil might
lead me to believe that he would think I might be being too generous on
Dave.     What are your thoughts?


You know, we've done something the last few tuesdays, and it is now my
favorite day of the week!  I had a great time.


eSource presents Free Global Energy Markets Presentation:

June. 5 	 9:00 -  9:30 AM	EB 5C2
June. 5 	 10:00 -  10:30 AM 	EB 5C2

Global Energy Markets
Global Energy Markets is an information service that gives you access to updated information and analysis whenever you need it.

Global Energy Markets provides many different news feeds and data sources in one service.  In addition, Global Energy Markets provides useful online databases for finding articles, projects and companies.

Each service is available by global region.  Services include the Americas, Asia-Pacific, Europe/CIS and the Middle East.  Each service includes four key modules.

The first core module is the energy news.  The news comes from Reuters, Dow Jones, Energy24x, BBC, AP, AFP, and others.  This is an all-in-one regional news service.  The other three modules are useful databases for finding news articles, project information and companies.  The second module is the Global Energy Projects Database.  The third module is the Global Energy News Archive.  The fourth is the Energy Companies Directory.

http://home.enron.com:84/messaging/globalenergymarkets.pdf

Seats fill up fast! To reserve a seat, please call Stephanie E. Taylor at 5-7928
No Shows will be charged $50.00
Check the eSource training page at http://esource.enron.com/training.doc for additional training sessions and vendor presentations.

http://esource.enron.com

<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>


of course.  You should probably sit with Stacey, because she has the most
daisy chains and confirming to do.  Any day but Friday will do this week.
Let me know.


Hi Tom,

	Thanks for your response.

	Where on the web is the course material?  I only saw the outline.

	Paul, let me know when you have some time to meet.

Thanks,
Iris
x3-6711

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	May, Tom
Sent:	Monday, September 17, 2001 10:02 AM
To:	Mack, Iris; Gupta, Gautam; Misra, Narsimha
Cc:	Thomas, Paul D.
Subject:	RE: New York Market Orientation Course (NYMOC)

Iris,

I agree with Rob that the course is a little light relative to the time spent.  The course material is on the web and I suggest going through this.  I would also include Paul Thomas in your resource list and recommend spending some time with Paul and the Northeast Physical group.  They live and breath this market daily.

Tom.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mack, Iris
Sent:	Monday, September 17, 2001 9:48 AM
To:	May, Tom; Gupta, Gautam; Misra, Narsimha
Subject:	FW: New York Market Orientation Course (NYMOC)

Hi,

	I came across a workshop which discusses all the aspects of NYISO' s operation - see email below.

	Some of the transmission guys suggested that Enron should be represented at this conference.

	However, Rob Stalford says that you guys are able to tell us everything we need to know about the new NYISO regulatory environment.

Thanks,
Iris

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Stalford, Robert
Sent:	Friday, September 14, 2001 12:16 PM
To:	Mack, Iris
Subject:	RE: New York Market Orientation Course (NYMOC)

Tom May, Gautam Gupta, Narsima Mishra

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mack, Iris
Sent:	Friday, September 14, 2001 12:10 PM
To:	Stalford, Robert
Subject:	RE: New York Market Orientation Course (NYMOC)

Thanks, which internal resources.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Stalford, Robert
Sent:	Friday, September 14, 2001 12:04 PM
To:	Mack, Iris; Arora, Harry; Gualy, Jaime; Wang, Steve; Wang, Steve
Subject:	RE: New York Market Orientation Course (NYMOC)

Unfortunately, this course does not stand up to the time invested by the participant. You will find better resources internally at ENRON.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mack, Iris
Sent:	Friday, September 14, 2001 11:57 AM
To:	Arora, Harry; Stalford, Robert; Gualy, Jaime; Wang, Steve; Wang, Steve
Subject:	New York Market Orientation Course (NYMOC)

FYI
	This program exposes market participants to all major aspects of NYISO' s operation. It addresses practical issues and is presented by those most familiar with the details involved for participation in the New York wholesale electric market.
 	(See http://www.nyiso.com/services/training/cinfo/index.html for further course information)

NYMOC runs from 8:30 am Tuesday,
Nov. 13 until noon Friday, Nov. 16.


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/02/2001 06:55 PM -----

	Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>
	04/02/2001 06:13 PM

		 To: Hedy Govenar <hgovenar@govadv.com>, Mike Day <MDay@GMSSR.com>, Bev
Hansen <bhansen@lhom.com>, Jeff Dasovich <jdasovic@enron.com>, Susan J Mara
<smara@enron.com>, Joseph Alamo <JAlamo@enron.com>, Paul Kaufman
<paul.kaufman@enron.com>, Michael McDonald <Michael.McDonald@enron.com>,
David Parquet <David.Parquet@enron.com>, Rick Johnson
<rick.johnson@enron.com>, Marcie Milner <mmilner@enron.com>, Sandra McCubbin
<Sandra.McCubbin@enron.com>, Tim Belden <Tim.Belden@enron.com>, Rick Shapiro
<rshapiro@enron.com>, Jim Steffes <james.d.steffes@enron.com>, Alan Comnes
<acomnes@enron.com>, Chris Calger <ccalger@enron.com>, Joe Hartsoe
<Joe.Hartsoe@enron.com>, Donna Fulton <Donna.Fulton@enron.com>, Steven Kean
<Steven.J.Kean@enron.com>, Karen Denne <kdenne@enron.com>, Beverly Aden
<beverly.aden@enron.com>, Bill Votaw <bill.votaw@enron.com>, Carol Moffett
<carol.moffett@enron.com>, Debora Whitehead <debora.whitehead@enron.com>,
Dennis Benevides <dennis.benevides@enron.com>, Don Black
<don.black@enron.com>, "dblack@enron.com" <dblack@enron.com>,
"emelvin@enron.com" <emelvin@enron.com>, "ehughes2@enron.com"
<ehughes2@enron.com>, "gweiss@enron.com" <gweiss@enron.com>,
"gsavage@enron.com" <gsavage@enron.com>, "Harry.Kingerski@enron.com"
<Harry.Kingerski@enron.com>, "kgustafs@enron.com" <kgustafs@enron.com>, Mike
D Smith <msmith1@enron.com>, "sgahn@enron.com" <sgahn@enron.com>,
"vsharp@enron.com" <vsharp@enron.com>, "wcurry@enron.com" <wcurry@enron.com>,
"William.S.Bradford@enron.com" <William.S.Bradford@enron.com>, Leslie Lawner
<Leslie.Lawner@enron.com>, John Neslage <john.neslage@enron.com>, Ken Smith
<ken@kdscommunications.com>, Bob Frank <bfrank@enron.com>, Jennifer Thome
<Jennifer.Thome@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Priority Legislation

Assembly Speaker Bob Hertzberg has circulated the following list of
priority bills which he would like to pass out of the Assembly this
week:

SBX 5 (Sher) - This bill provides a total of $1, 039,500,000 from the
General Fund to implement energy efficiency programs and supplement
existing energy efficiency programs.

SBX 43 (Alpert) - This bill extends the SDG&E rate freeze to users over
100kw.

ABX 29 (Kehoe) - This bill This bill creates a variety of new programs
relating to energy
efficiency and distributed generation.

SBX 6 (Burton) - This bill creates the California Consumer Power and
Conservation Financing Authority (CPCFA), (2) authorizes the issuance of
bonds up to $5 billion, and (3) specifies that the CPCFA shall not
undertake any new projects after January 1, 2007.

SBX 28 (Sher)   This bill contains a series of provisions intended to
accommodate increased construction and operation of power plants.  The
bill also provides a 10-year waiver of standby charges for specified
distributed generation (DG) installations.


ok I will tell him you said you are too busy

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 4:56 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

you are such a liar

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 4:55 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:

Fred needs to see you


Welcome to Enron Center South. As you have probably already noticed, things look a little different here. We wanted to orientate you to your new environment and inform you about the future technology coming on-line in the coming weeks.

Occupancy Guidebook To Enron Center South
You will find this handy guide on your desk; it contains information concerning the enhanced printer environment, the new easy access keyboards and telephony procedures.

NEC Monitors
The NEC monitors have an internal anti-glare screen to help reduce eye strain and eliminate the need to install an additional screen cover.  Additionally, an integrated speaker has been installed on one monitor for each desk.

Turret Users
An "Alliance MX turret quick reference guide" has been placed on your desk; this includes important information about the new features such as "Caller ID" and "Voicemail Indication".

Increased Information Access
There are many NEC 50" Plasma screens installed on the 5th and 6th floors.  While many of these will be displaying information designed for the specific unit, others will be displaying various television channels.  The audio to these television channels can be accessed via any of your telephony equipment.  Here's how:

Ten audio channels have been set up for access from your either your Avaya telephone, Stentophon, or IPC Turret.  The channels have been defined on Page 15 of your Turret.  To access the audio from either your Avaya or Stentophon, simply dial the extensions shown in the table below:

Channel	Avaya	Stentophon
Weather Channel	12401	801
CNN Headlines News	12402	802
CNN Financial News	12403	803
CNBC	12404	804
MSNBC	12405	805
Bloomberg	12406	806
Financial News Network	12407	807
CNN	12408	808
Fox Sports	12409	809
ESPN1	12410	810

Wireless Telephony
You may notice the cellular phone coverage is not consistent across the floor, and some areas have virtually no coverage at all.  We are implementing a multi-network "in-building" system to provide consistent high quality service for the campus, keeping you in touch while you are on the move.

Wireless LAN
The infrastructure to support Wireless LAN technology is in place and is being tested. We will be implementing multi level encryption and security to keep our intellectual property safe from eavesdroppers or hackers.

Amtel Replacement
As a move to provide a more flexible "Plug n Play" environment and to help with the reduced desk footprint, we have replaced the Amtel message boxes with Microsoft Exchange Instant Messaging. The Global Messaging Team is testing additional software products to provide some of the features not available with Exchange Instant Messaging; these include one-touch response keys, external LED display, and printing.  Updates will be provided as they become available.

Keeping an Open forum
We will keep you informed of the changes and developments as the migration to the building continues, please feel free to respond with any comments, queries or suggestions to  mailto:Enron.Center.South.Technology@enron.com


Following please find the Daily EnronOnline Executive Summary.

EnronOnline Executive Summary for 12/15/2000
Transaction Summary
External Transactions Today	3,153
Average Daily External Transactions (30 day Trailing Avg)	4,310
Total Life to Date Transactions	529,333

EnronOnline Daily % of Entity's Total Transactions for 12/15/00	Trans	Percent
Enron North America	2,379	69%
Enron Europe Limited	182	39%
Global Products	109	27%
Enron Metals	483	25%

EnronOnline Percentage of Total Corporate Transactions
(30 day Trailing Avg)	55%

Gross Notional Value of EnronOnline Transactions	Total
Today	2,190,813,840
MTD	39,901,692,567
LTD	318,754,453,897
Average Daily Notional Value (30 Day Trailing Avg)	3,389,756,362

Notional Revenue from Physical Flows to Date	21,245,199,246

Counterparties, Users, and Products Offered
Counterparties having transacted to date	612
New Counterparties transacting for the first time today	0
Number of Products Offered Today	1,008
Total Number of External Users Logged on Today	3,294
Average # of External Users logged on (30 day Trailing Avg)	3,021

Also attached is the Weekly Public Domain Report, containing information
which is intended for use in presentations or reports which will be seen by
individuals outside Enron.


Please plan on attending a training session over lunch on Tuesday, Feb 15th.
(Lunch will be provided.)  I intend to discuss the operations of Houston Pipe
Line;  how gas is moved through the system, where our main supply and market
areas are, locations of specific points, etc.  We will be using a map of the
pipeline as the basis for the discussion.  So, come to the meeting with any
questions you have on HPL, anything is fair game.

Yvette is currently working on securing a room.  I will let you know when
that is finalized.

Let me know if you have any questions.

D


Start Date: 4/25/01; HourAhead hour: 20;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.


Jim, Jeff, and Tim,
I hope all is well.  I often wish I were on the
Portland trading floor in that gov't affairs job but
that's history and my family is here in DC where they
correctly thought they belonged.  I'm writing because
I just interviewed to be Pat Wood's technical advisor,
one of FERC's top positions, and wanted to alert you
that I mentioned you and your group as a reference.  I
hope that is ok; in my view we parted on good terms.
He gave me the impression that I am very much in the
running.  I don't know if Enron people are applying
and don't want to compete with them.  But I think I'm
generally on the same page with you on policy issues
and I expect you would favor having more familiarity
with markets and market-oriented policies on staff
there.  Given your companies longstanding relationship
with Wood I thought you might be consulted on this.
If so, I am asking for your support.
Thanks!
Rob Gramlich
301-280-6195

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger
http://im.yahoo.com


Hey!  Did you ever chat with my buddy Ishi?  Are you going to work for
Enron?  We get discounted deal tickets to Astroworld every April - you don't
want to miss that!!


Are you currently involved in any negotiations w/ Aquila Energy Marketing
Corporation?

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


(See attached file: bta.pdf)

Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606  USA
Tel:  312-368-6149
Fax:  312-368-2281
soblander@carrfut.com
http://www.carrfut.com
 - bta.pdf


Looks good to me.

	Sara Shackleton
	05/30/2000 08:13 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan
Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: vacation

All:   I would like to take the following dates if no conflicts:

(1)  Friday, June 30

(2)  week of July 24 - 28

Please let me know if there is a problem.  Sara


Latest exposure report for California.

Call if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Bill
3-3831

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Conwell, Wendy
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 6:44 PM
To: Bradford, William S.
Subject: California Exposure COB 03/13/01

---------------------- Forwarded by Wendy Conwell/NA/Enron on 03/14/2001
06:43 PM ---------------------------

  From:  Wendy Conwell
     03/14/2001 06:40 PM

To: William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: California Exposure COB 03/13/01

Wendy


Hi Jonathan,

Sorry If my e:mails have been somewhat confusing.  If you could expand your outlined responsibilites/role into more detail (yes more words to describe technically what you do).

an example of one I recevied from one of the IT folks is as follows:

Thanks , Karen B.

Detailed job description

Design of overall architecture of online commodity trading application, supervise and lead implementation of that architecture. The position includes the following technologies and responsibilities.
?	Serve as technical lead and architect across client-side Delphi projects within EnronOnline.
?	Mentoring developers in new technologies, object oriented analysis and design, and software developing practice.
?	Design of structure of application using Unified Modeling Language (UML). Create use-case, class and sequence diagrams.
?	Design of structure of XML used in applications. Create Document Type Definition (DTD) and XML Schema files.
?	Design classes and interfaces, selection appropriate tools and technologies,
?	Use Delphi and Object Pascal as primary platform and programming language to implement all software functionality.
?	Develop structure of Delphi application. Write of base modules and classes using Delphi and Object Pascal Language.
?	Design of COM objects and interfaces. Develop overall structure of distributed COM architecture for applications and supervise implementation.
?	ActiveX for developing client-side high-performance Internet components.
?	Use TIBCO for enterprise-wide messaging.
?	Use Oracle as the backend enterprise database.
?	Develop SQL queries to retrieve data from database.
?	Design and develop communication functionality via Internet using HTTP and HTTPS protocols.
?	Design principles of User Interface for applications. Develop and implement GUI.
?	Design and create XML Stylesheet Language Transformation (XSLT) modules for XML data transformation.
?	XPath for browsing and selection information from XML data.
?	Architect WebServices applications for language and platform independent development using WSDL, UDDI, XML, SOAP, and related standards.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mckay, Jonathan
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 4:18 PM
To:	Buckley, Karen
Subject:	RE:

I guess I'm not sure what you are after?  Do you have an example of another one that I could work off of ?  If I had a better idea of what kind of thing were suppose to be included I could probably get you something else.   Are we after more words or more duties.

Jon

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Buckley, Karen
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 2:05 PM
To:	Mckay, Jonathan
Subject:	RE:

Hey Jonathan

anyway in which you could expand this?  If not, I will send it on and see what the feedback is.

Karen.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mckay, Jonathan
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 2:57 PM
To:	Buckley, Karen
Subject:	RE:

I hope this works....  << File: Job Description.doc >>

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Buckley, Karen
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 10:59 AM
To:	Mckay, Jonathan
Subject:

Hi Jonathan

Don't forget to send me your job description (word doc will work).

Thanks,

Karen.


We had a very good work session with GE today to iron out the details of the
break out contract.  We expect to have a draft on Monday, which should be
close to final as far as the form goes.  I have also asked A & K to prepare a
memo outlining what will need to be done on a project basis to complete the
document.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Kay


Mollie....

 -----Original Appointment-----
From: 	Gustafson, Mollie   On Behalf Of Calger, Christopher F.
Sent:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 3:38 PM
To:	Calger, Christopher F.; Mcdonald, Michael; Lackey, Chris; Woodland, Andrea; Thome, Stephen; Etringer, Michael; Wente, Laura; Shields, Jeff; Hall, Steve C. (Legal); Yoder, Christian; Belden, Tim; Crandall, Sean; Scholtes, Diana; Richter, Jeff; Semperger, Cara; Mallory, Chris; Williams, Bill; Thomas, Jake
Subject:	Updated: Mtg. to discuss assignment of customers. Transmission list:  P/LEGAL/PROJECTNETCO/NETCOTRANSMISSION.XLS
When:	Wednesday, January 30, 2002 10:00 AM-11:00 AM (GMT-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada); Tijuana.
Where:	Mt. Hood ( Main )


Mary,

 It is OK to buy a carpet shampooer.
 About the W-2's, how would you


You have received this email because you are listed as a security approver.
Please click
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000009797&Page=
Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000009797
Request Create Date : 12/11/00 9:39:04 AM
Requested For       : diana.andel@enron.com
Resource Name       : EOL Canada Backoffice Bridge Monitor
Resource Type       : Applications


Attached is a revised Credit Watch listing as of 4/02/01.
If there are any personnel in your group that were not included in this
distribution, please insure that they receive a copy of this report.
To add additional people to this distribution, or if this report has been
sent to you in error, please contact Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002.
For other questions, please contact Bill Bradford at x3-3831, Russell Diamond
at x5-7095, or Brant Reves at x3-9897.


You are receiving this email from American Email Brands. If you would prefer not to receive messages of this sort in the future, please see the unsubscribe instructions at the bottom of this email.

[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
													[IMAGE] 	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]														[IMAGE]
													[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE] 							 [IMAGE] 							[IMAGE]
						[IMAGE]	[IMAGE] 						 [IMAGE] 	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]			  Hey Daren,    Hurry, enter today for your chance to win a new Lexus RX300 SUV! By simply letting us know what you are interested in, you will earn a chance to win this gorgeous vehicle. It's as simple as that!   This could be the car of your dreams, but you can't win if you don't enter.   Already entered previously? Improve your odds by entering again - Sweepstakes ends December 28th!   Good Luck!   Stephanie & Mark  Co-Founders, winfreestuff.com  2403 S 130th Circle  Omaha, NE 68144   	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]													 [IMAGE] 	[IMAGE]

If you would prefer not to receive marketing messages from us, please click here.


Hi Shirley, please give me a few dates form end of march to first week in
April to do an offsite for Vince's direct reports (including myself) and
selected EBS research people. This includes, Vince direct report from our
research group and the following people from EBS Research:

Ravi, Stinson, Samer, Chinowee.

The agenda will include: Research people giving several mini presentations on
Trading, market development (history of Nat gas, Electricity, etc.), pricing,
etc...

John's people will do similar mini presentations on Optical Network
engineering, optical components, provisioning, telecom markets, pricing,
etc....
If Scott Yeager can make it, he will do his magic via quick motivational
speech on the vision of EBS, etc..

It is will be strictly Technical to Technical professional meeting to get to
know each others group. So, do not include others unles Stinson or I look at
the additions case-by-case.

John suggested Scott Yeager's summar house in Denver for this event.  Please
follow this up with Scott's assistant (Scott may not know about this if John
has not told him so you should explain the intend, etc.) to get in touch with
Scott.  I'll cc this e-mail to give Scott a heads up.

We can do half day friday and all day saturday. Or, we can do the whole
weekend and people will have an option to bring family to nearby hotel
(family expense in NOT on EBS). We will have to sort all this out when we
have a chance to talk to John & Scott.

I just wanted to get the ball rolling but getting dates and place first.

Thanks,

Ravi.


did he tell you if he was coming or not?
-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Bass [mailto:JBass@stdauto.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 10:20 AM
To: Bass, Eric
Subject: RE: Bachelor Party

Ya, I talked to him he said he would email you.

-----Original Message-----
From: Bass, Eric [mailto:Eric.Bass@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 9:45 AM
To: Jason Bass
Subject: RE: Bachelor Party

I haven't heard back form Tom yet, but everyone else is going.
Can you get in touch with him?

-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Bass [mailto:JBass@stdauto.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 4:56 PM
To: Bass, Eric
Subject: RE: Bachelor Party
So who all is coming and isn't?  I know Jeff can't make it.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Bass
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 4:18 PM
To: 'Bass, Eric'
Subject: RE: Bachelor Party
That sounds like fun.  The date of the party is January 19, 2002.
Invites
Dad
Scott
smacfarland@gpch.org
Jeff Scott
jayandem@earthlink.net
Brian Lisenby
I will get that one
Ramiro Castano
lqcolombo@aol.com
Tom Fielder
tommybomb88@hotmail.com
Billy Brown
Billy.Brown2@COMPAQ.com

I think that is all.  I will finalize in the next couple of days.
Would you please send me your address?
Thanks,
Jason
-----Original Message-----
From: Bass, Eric [ <mailto:Eric.Bass@ENRON.com>]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 3:35 PM
To: jbass@stdauto.com
Subject: Bachelor Party
<http://www.txtreasure.com/>

what do you think about this.

and you still need to send me a list of invitees (with e-mail)   and the date of the party.

-e

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Thor, I'm getting stuck in a meeting at that time and will follow up.
Thanks.  Jeff

Thor Lien
11/13/2000 11:32 PM
To: Jennifer Burns/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Phone conf. w/ Jeff Shankman

I will call

Thor

Jennifer Burns

14/11/2000 00:27

To: Thor Lien/OSL/ECT@ECT
cc: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Phone conf. w/ Jeff Shankman

In reference to message below......can we make this 9:30AM CST.  Thanks
---------------------- Forwarded by Jennifer Burns/HOU/ECT on 11/13/2000
05:26 PM ---------------------------

Jennifer Burns

11/13/2000 04:22 PM

To: thor.lien@enron.com
cc: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Phone conf. w/ Jeff Shankman

Hello.

Jeff Shankman would like to speak to you via conference call on Tuesday,
November 14th.  If your schedule permits please call Jeff at 9:00AM CST.
Jeff's number is 713/853-1761.  Thanks!

Jennifer


_______________________________________________________________

This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read,
copy, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the
sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system.
Thank you.
_______________________________________________________________

The following questions were raised by our review of the draft
environmental schedules on Dealbench.

LV Cogen I and II

1.  Schedule 4.1(i) references an annual audit of the CEM system in May
2000.  Is this audit on Dealbench and/or can we get a copy of it?

2.  Please provide a copy and/or reference to a Dealbench document for the
Phase I referenced on Schedule 4.1(n).

3.  Please provide copies and/or references to Dealbench documents for the
items listed as 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 on Schedule 4.1(u).  [Note that we have
reviewed the 1995 storm water permit, but did not see an indication that it
is automatically renewed.  Is this reflected elsewhere?]

Wheatland, Gleason and Lincoln

1.  We noticed that Schedule 4.1(u) for each facility indicates that an
SPCC is needed but not currently in place.  What is stored that triggers
the SPCC requirement?  How long have these materials been stored at the
facilities?

Please feel free to call me if you have any questions or if you would like
to discuss these issues in further detail.  Thanks.


Attached is the Weekly Report for week ending September 15.

Below is attached the summary of the Columbia Gas technical conference on its
auction procedures.

The September 19 Conference and Dave Neubauer's presentation is attached.

Final Rule in Electronic Filing of Documents is attached (RM00-12.doc).
Errata Notice on the OCS Rulemaking (RM99-5.doc)

Chairman Hoecker spoke to the European Energy Conference in Norway on August
31.  His remarks are attached.

Commissioner Massey addressed the Edison Electric Institute's Board of
Directors on "RTO formation in Well Functioning Markets."  His remarks are
attached.


Good afternoon!

Attached is the list of Associate Candidates to whom offers have been
extended from Super Saturday IV.  Please feel encouraged to call or e-mail to
congratulate them!

Let me know if you have any questions (ext. 3-6176).

Thank you for all your help!
Elizabeth Boudreaux

PS-  I have also included the "no offer" list, just FYI.