Today's hearing was dominated by :
1) many lawyers arguing over whether the Commission must declare that the
"rate freeze" is over before raising rates, or whether the Commission can
rely on its general constitutional and statutory authority to raise rates on
an interim basis, without addressing the issue of the rate freeze, and,
1) an appearance by Ralph Nader.

The Legal Issue
In general, our proposal seems to have gotten some traction.  Whether it
sticks remains to be seen, however.  We proposed that:

The Commission has the authority to raise rates without addressing the rate
freeze issue.
The Commission will not have the facts it needs, and it won't have  provided
the due process necessary by Jan 4th, to address all the complex issues tied
to the rate freeze.  And if it tries, it's likely to face a flurry of law
suits, which is in no one's best interest.
For it's Jan 4th decision, the Commission should confine itself to
determining whether, and if so by how much, to raise rates to maintain the
utilities' access to capital markets. (We've taken no position on whether
there's a need to raise rates.)
setting a hearing schedule to examine the "rate freeze" and all related
issues thoroughly and methodically.

The utilities argued that the Commission must declare an end to the rate
freeze; otherwise any Commission decision to raise rates would be easy to
attack in the courts.  (In reality, the utilities want the Commission to end
the rate freeze in order to assure lenders that the Commission will permit
the utilities to recover going-forward procurement costs.  Under the rate
freeze, the utility is at risk for procurement costs that exceed the rate
freeze.)

In his presentation, our outside counsel offered numerous citations to past
Commission decision and court cases supporting the Commission's ability to
raise rates if it found it necessary to do so.  Many other parties agreed
with our position.  A few parties said that the issue was too murky to make a
call.  During questioning, both the President of the Commission (Loretta
Lynch) and the presiding judge seemed to indicate that they believe the
Commission has ample authority to raise rates without having to address the
rate freeze issues.

The Ralph Factor
Apparently, having lost the Presidential election, Ralph Nader's still
looking for work.  He showed up at the hearings today and held a very lengthy
news conference.  From what I could hear, he targeted all of his criticism at
the utilities for being greedy, and at the Governor for being too ready and
willing to bail the utilities out.  Even when thrown some soft balls about
"out of state generators," Nader stuck to bashing the Governor and the
utilities.  But I couldn't hear the entire press conference, so he may have
said things that I missed.

The Next Steps
The hearings that were scheduled to end today will now go into next week.
Tomorrow, the utilities are scheduled to make their case for financial
hardship.  Customers intend to question the utilities very aggressively (as
does the PUC).  The utilities will also have the chance to question the
consumer representatives who filed their own proposals and analysis with the
Commission.
On Tuesday, the Commission is likely to take up the issue of how big any rate
increase needs to be and how much of the increase each customer group should
shoulder.

More tomorrow on the call.

Best,
Jeff

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	12/27/2000 08:57 PM

		 To: Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, skean@enron.com, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron, James
D Steffes/NA/Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron, mpalmer@enron.com, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT, Frank W Vickers/HOU/ECT, Robert
Badeer/HOU/ECT, Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT
		 cc: Beverly Aden/HOU/EES@EES, Brenda Barreda/HOU/EES@EES, Carol
Moffett/HOU/EES@EES, Cathy Corbin/HOU/EES@EES, Christina Liscano/HOU/EES@EES,
Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Debora Whitehead/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis
Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Dorothy Youngblood/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Eric Melvin/HOU/EES@EES, Erika
Dupre/HOU/EES@EES, Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Fran Deltoro/HOU/EES@EES, Gayle W
Muench/HOU/EES@EES, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@ENRON, Gordon Savage/HOU/EES@EES,
Harold G Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@ENRON, Iris
Waser/HOU/EES@EES, James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES,
Jess Hewitt/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy Bass/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES,
Ken Gustafson/HOU/EES@EES, Kevin Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Leasa Lopez/HOU/EES@EES,
Leticia Botello/HOU/EES@EES, Mark S Muller/HOU/EES@EES, Marsha
Suggs/HOU/EES@EES, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Meredith M Eggleston/HOU/EES@EES,
Mike M Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Neil Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Neil Hong/HOU/EES@EES,
Paula Warren/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON, Rita
Hennessy/NA/Enron@ENRON, Rosalinda Tijerina/HOU/EES@EES, Scott
Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Sharon Dick/HOU/EES@EES, Tanya
Leslie/HOU/EES@EES, Tasha Lair/HOU/EES@EES, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terri
Greenlee/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tony Spruiell/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES,
Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Update--Day 1 of California PUC Hearings

Thanks Roger.  Here are the highlights of today's hearings:

 Common themes--many tracked ours pretty closely
Not a question of whether rates need to rise, but by how much.
Though some oppose any and all rate increases, the lion's share acknowledged
that the utilities have a cash flow problem and the a rate increase is
necessary.
Due process matters.
If the Commission is thinking about going as far as ending rate freezes and
increasing rates, it better provide for ample due process, or countless law
suits will ensue.
Don't jump the gun.
A rate increase is likely, but only the utilities benefit from adoption of
the utilities' proposals. The Commission needs to carefully scrutinize the
utilities' claims and take a careful look at the level of increase required
to maintain access to capital markets.  However, as expected, the utilities
implored the Commission to jump the gun immediately.  The utilities want the
Commission to declare an end to the rate freeze and raise rates on Jan.4.
No more divestiture.
The utility should keep the generating assets it retained, but the Commission
should ensure that the assets' benefits are allocated equally among all
customers.  One legislator recommended that the State buy the utilities'
hydro assets, which would give the utilities the cash they need and give the
state control over some generation.
Treat all customers equally and fairly.
The Commission should not create two classes of customers (e.g., large v.
small; direct access v. bundled).  No customer group should be sacrificied to
save another.
Be as narrow as possible/do as little harm as possible
The immediate problem is the utility's cash/credit crunch.  As such, the
Commission should do only enough to solve this very specific, immediate
problem.  A modest rate increase is all that's required and the Commission
should do no more.

At the beginning and the end of the hearing, the President of the Commission
asked parties to be prepared (at tomorrow's hearing) to discuss whether the
Commission could legally use its other, broad powers to raise rates without
declaring an end to the rate freeze.  It seems that she seems some benefit in
raising rates, but leaving AB 1890 otherwise intact untill the Commission can

Marketers and generators are to blame for the problem
Though not universally embraced, the theme came up repeatedly.

A few parties (e.g., the Unions, low income consumer groups, one PUC
commissioner) called for complete re-regulation of the industry, returning
the utilities to vertically integrated monopolies.  But they were the
exception rather than the rule at today's hearing.

2. Next steps
There hearings were scheduled to end on Thursay, but now will continue
through Friday.
Tomorrow, lawyers will provide "oral" arguments on whether the Commission
must end the rate freeze in order to increase rates.  We will argue that it
does not have to, and should not, go through the complex and controversial
exercise of determing whether the rate freeze is over between now and
01.04.01.  We will argue that the Commission has the authority to raise rates
without ending the rate freeze, and if it decides to raise rates, it should
do so while keeping AB 1890's basic structure in place until a full and fair
hearing of the issues is completed.   We are talking to other stakeholders to
persuade them to take the same approach.  In terms of legal arguments, this
is clearly a long shot, but one that seems worth taking.
After the oral argument, the utilities will present their rate proposals and
"all interested persons" will have the opportunity to cross-examine the
utilities (in short, tomorrow will also be a zoo).
When asked what the process will be for issuing a proposed decision and
providing comments, the President of the Commission responded "we don't know,
it's evolving."  In other words, the Commission is doing a poor job of
ensuring that their Jan 4 decision is "appeal-proof."
Keep in mind that the situation remains extremely fluid and the trend is
still toward ending the rate freeze on Jan. 4th.  We continue to aggressively
offer alternatives to that possibility and continue to try to bring other
stakeholders to our side.
We're doing everything necessary to preserve our appeal rights.

We can discuss further on the 10 AM (CST) call tomorrow.

Best,
Jeff

	Roger Yang@EES
	12/27/2000 05:43 PM

		 To: Leticia Botello/HOU/EES@EES
		 cc: Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, James W
Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Tony
Spruiell/HOU/EES@EES, Mike M Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Meredith M
Eggleston/HOU/EES@EES, Neil Hong/HOU/EES@EES, Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Neil
Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Jess Hewitt/HOU/EES@EES, Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT,
William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Eric
Melvin/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Gayle W Muench/HOU/EES@EES,
Gordon Savage/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Ken
Gustafson/HOU/EES@EES, Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki
Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Kevin Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES,
Harold G Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Mark S Muller/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy
Bass/HOU/EES@EES, Rosalinda Tijerina/HOU/EES@EES, Debora
Whitehead/HOU/EES@EES, Leasa Lopez/HOU/EES@EES, Christina
Liscano/HOU/EES@EES, Tasha Lair/HOU/EES@EES, Erika Dupre/HOU/EES@EES, Rita
Hennessy/NA/Enron@Enron, Brenda Barreda/HOU/EES@EES, Marsha
Suggs/HOU/EES@EES, Carol Moffett/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES, Cathy
Corbin/HOU/EES@EES, Sharon Dick/HOU/EES@EES, Beverly Aden/HOU/EES@EES, Tanya
Leslie/HOU/EES@EES, Paula Warren/HOU/EES@EES, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES, Ginger
Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron, Dorothy Youngblood/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terri
Greenlee/NA/Enron@ENRON, Fran Deltoro/HOU/EES@EES, Iris Waser/HOU/EES@EES
		 Subject: Re: Reminder - Level Setting Mtg-California Markets Focus Group
EB2868

Got an update from Jeff Dasovich.  No earth shattering news.  Comments have
been all over the place.  The impression is being made by differing parties
that the issues are very complex and would inevitably result in endless
lawsuits.  Possible conclusion by the CPUC may be to invoke emergency powers
to implement an emergency surcharge and avoid addressing the issue of when
the rate freeze ends in these hearings.  However, this is just speculation.
Jeff will return to the office by 5:00 pm PST and will send out a summary of
today's hearings.

Roger

Leticia Botello
12/27/2000 06:57 AM
To: Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, James W
Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Tony
Spruiell/HOU/EES@EES, Mike M Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Meredith M
Eggleston/HOU/EES@EES, Neil Hong/HOU/EES@EES, Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Neil
Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Jess Hewitt/HOU/EES@EES, Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT,
William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Eric
Melvin/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Gayle W Muench/HOU/EES@EES,
Gordon Savage/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Ken
Gustafson/HOU/EES@EES, Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron@Enron, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES,
Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES,
Kevin Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Harold G
Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Mark S Muller/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy Bass/HOU/EES@EES,
Rosalinda Tijerina/HOU/EES@EES, Debora Whitehead/HOU/EES@EES, Leasa
Lopez/HOU/EES@EES, Christina Liscano/HOU/EES@EES, Tasha Lair/HOU/EES@EES,
Erika Dupre/HOU/EES@EES, Rita Hennessy/NA/Enron@Enron, Brenda
Barreda/HOU/EES@EES, Marsha Suggs/HOU/EES@EES, Carol Moffett/HOU/EES@EES,
Kathy Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES, Cathy Corbin/HOU/EES@EES, Sharon Dick/HOU/EES@EES,
Beverly Aden/HOU/EES@EES, Tanya Leslie/HOU/EES@EES, Paula Warren/HOU/EES@EES,
Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron, Dorothy
Youngblood/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terri Greenlee/NA/Enron@ENRON, Fran
Deltoro/HOU/EES@EES, Iris Waser/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Reminder - Level Setting Mtg-California Markets Focus Group EB2868

12/27/00

Time    Location Call In #  Pass Code

10:00 Central Standard Time  EB 2868  1-800-713-8600  80435

This is a recurring daily meeting until further notice  (this invitation will
schedule your calendar through 1/31/01).

Time, Call In #, and Pass Code are the same for all meetings.  Conference
room location will be changed as soon as possible to better accommodate the
participants.

Note:  Optional Invitees FYI Only

Please call me if you have any questions

Leticia

x-58752


---------------------- Forwarded by Janet H Wallis/HOU/ECT on 03/08/2001
02:49 PM ---------------------------

Bruce Sukaly@ENRON
03/05/2001 04:52 PM
To: Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Doug Gilbert-Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David
Portz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet H Wallis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Berney C Aucoin/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Edith Cross/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jason R Wiesepape/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle
Parks/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: TECO Fronterra-Here it is

---------------------- Forwarded by Bruce Sukaly/Corp/Enron on 03/05/2001
04:50 PM ---------------------------

"Joan Johnson" <jejohnson@tecoenergy.com> on 03/05/2001 04:39:03 PM
To: <bruce.sukaly@enron.com>, <MCurry@enron.com>, "Dan Sanford"
<danlsanford@tecoenergy.com>, "Eric Bronner" <ebronner@tecoenergy.com>,
"Frank Busot" <flbusot@tecoenergy.com>, "George D. Jennings"
<gdjennings@tecoenergy.com>
cc:

Subject: Draft Energy Management Services Agreement

Gentlemen:  Attached please find the first rough draft for discussion
purposes only.

Joan E. Johnson
Paralegal
TECO Energy, Inc.
Phone:  (813) 228-4329
Fax:  (813) 228-1328
jejohnson@tecoenergy.com

 - Frontera Energy Agreement clean.doc


Jason:  She did call and wanted John, you and me.  I am available untill
roughly 11 am when the lawyers depart for the Woodlands.  She indicated that
this provision was necessary if we EVER decided to net physical/financial.
(Jason:  we won't agree to that now and if we ever did, I am sure we would
either amend all of our masters or put a separate netting agreement in
place).  She did indicate that Harvard MIGHT drop the request.  I don't
particularly want the provision in the agreement.   My calendar is open if
you want to schedule.  SS

	"JASON PETERS" <PETEJ@andrews-kurth.com>
	10/04/2000 05:27 PM

		 To: <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Harvard

Sara,

Kim Noble called.  She was hoping that we could talk in the morning.  She
indicated that anything before 10:00 AM worked for her.  I told her I would
pass it on.

Jason


They do look tight.  But after a $2 drop, you'd have to expect it to pinch.
Seems like, unless things really fall out of bed, this spread should widen
from here.  Even if the front stays relatively unchanged.

----Original Message-----
   >From:      John Arnold/HOU/ECT
   >To:          Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT
   >Cc:
   >Bcc:
   >Subj:
   >Sent:     Wednesday, December 13, 2000 12:33 PM
   >
   >remember when you said there is a reason they call them bear spreads?
   >
   >bring up a chart of f/g or g/h.
   >f/g is tighter now than anytime since march 99 when ff1 was worth 2.50
   >
   >
   >amazing


Corinne:  Thanks for the message.  We have not yet resolved the interest
issue.  But it is the only issue left.  Please retain the second signature
for Singapore trading.  I hope to have an answer early next week.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	"Corinne A Samon" <samon_corinne@jpmorgan.com>
	03/08/2001 03:24 PM

		 To: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Re: futures agreement

Sara,
As per our discussion last week, we have agreed upon all changes to the client
agreement with the exception of the interest issue - which was under review by
your business people.

Can you please provide me with a status update?
If you prefer, our salesperson is more than happy to discuss the issue with
your
business people.
Please forward the appropriate contact name or number, or have then call
Michael
Schneider directly at  (212) 648-1164.

Many thanks for your assistance with this matter.

Regards,
Corinne

Corinne A Samon
02/28/2001 11:05 AM

To:   Sara.Shackleton@enron.com
cc:
Subject:  Re: futures agreement  (Document link not converted)

Sara,
We are in agreement with your proposed changes to the arbitration language.

I await your reply concerning the rest of the comments to the client
agreement.

Regards,
Corinne 6-4292

Sara.Shackleton@enron.com on 02/27/2001 06:33:48 PM

To:   samon_corinne@jpmorgan.com
cc:
Subject:  Re: futures agreement

Corinne:

Attached is your arbitration language (marked) and our arbitration text.  I
hope this does it!  Thanks.

(See attached file: JPMorganarbitrationR1.doc)

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

                    "Corinne A Samon"
                    <samon_corinne@jpm        To:
Sara.Shackleton@enron.com
                    organ.com>                cc:
                                              Subject:     Re: futures
agreement
                    02/27/2001 02:58
                    PM

Sara,
Thank you for your fax.
Section 180.3 of the CEA prohibits us from agreeing to any settlement
procedure/forum ahead of time.  JPMFI, in accordance with 180.3, will offer
3
forums - which will include AAA.  If Enron chooses AAA, the arbitration
will be
subject to the provisions specified in your fax dd 2/26/2001.

Attached is JPM's proposed language for the arbitration agreement.

(See attached file: ARBITRATION AGREEMENT.doc)

If you are in agreement with the language, please forward Enron's proposed
language (detailed in your 2/26 fax) electronically (if available).

Thank you and Regards,
Corinne

Sara.Shackleton@enron.com on 02/26/2001 12:36:22 PM

To:   samon_corinne@jpmorgan.com
cc:
Subject:  futures agreement

Corinne:

I just sent you a fax re:  arbitration.

I have not heard from your salesperson re:  interest schedule for debit
rate (Sec. 2) and credit rate (Sec. 6).  Thanks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

(See attached file: ARBITRATION AGREEMENT.doc)

 - JPMorganarbitrationR1.doc
 - ARBITRATION AGREEMENT.doc


Zou,

Hello, I hope you had a good flight back to Texas.  Thank you very much for your visit to the Denver location - I found it very informative.

I faxed over travel profiles to your office for the Enron North America, Denver employees.  I am now requesting the right to make travel using "ClickTrip" on behalf of the employees in our office:  Mark Whitt, Paul Lucci, Theresa Staab, and Tyrell Harrison.  Please set me, Heidi DuBose, up as their travel arranger.

Thank you again for the meeting,

Sincerely,
Heidi DuBose

Heidi DuBose
Enron North America
303.575.6470 (ph)
303.534.0552 (fx)


You might want to call her and see if she can tell you anything.  I was assuming this was the totals still sitting on the ledger, but maybe not all of it.  Let me know if you can't reach her.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jacobs, Charles
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:29 PM
To: James, Marlo C.
Cc: Love, Phillip M.
Subject: RE: NICOR

In a word - NO!!  Can you clue me in on what you need?  I have Lisa's email address and phone number if you don't think we can find it...

-----Original Message-----
From: James, Marlo C.
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 12:51 PM
To: Jacobs, Charles
Cc: Love, Phillip M.
Subject: FW: NICOR

Chuck, Do you know the figures to give to Phillip?  I wasn't sure if Lisa filled you in on any of this before she left.
-----Original Message-----
From: Love, Phillip M.
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 2:39 PM
To: James, Marlo C.
Subject: RE: NICOR

The desk took the adjustment and we were waiting on Lisa to verify the amounts on the A/R.  We need to know the variance on the A/R by month to compare to my analysis and we can then change the prices in Sitara.  The desk took a 5.7 million dollar expense PMA.  Please let me know if and when you guys have the info and we can get it fixed in Sitara.  Until this gets done, OA will have a variance on flash to actual because the desk already took the adjustment - we wanted to get it in for year end.
PL

-----Original Message-----
From: James, Marlo C.
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 4:02 PM
To: Love, Phillip M.
Subject: RE: NICOR

How is this going?  Jennifer Lee is OA is questioning the impact and is trying to understand everything so I sent her copies of our communications.  Any further communications need to copy her on since Lisa V. is no longer here.

Thanks,
Marlo

-----Original Message-----
From: Love, Phillip M.
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 4:09 PM
To: James, Marlo C.
Subject: RE: NICOR

still working.  I hope to have it completed before the week is out.  As I am sure you are experiencing as well all the fire drills that are currently going on around here, I have been running since I got back from vacation.  Believe me when I say this is a high priority for me as well because of all the potential P&L fallout for the traders who have been entering this information.
PL

-----Original Message-----
From: James, Marlo C.
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 8:56 AM
To: Love, Phillip M.
Cc: Saucier, Darla
Subject: RE: NICOR

How are things going with this.  We need to give updates to our leads.

-----Original Message-----
From: Saucier, Darla
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 12:58 PM
To: James, Marlo C.
Subject: FW: NICOR

-----Original Message-----
From: Love, Phillip M.
Sent: Mon 11/12/2001 11:05 AM
To: Saucier, Darla
Cc:
Subject: RE: NICOR

can you get me copies of the August Invoice.  Cora is very confident we have done everything correctly and I am still disagreeing with her(agreeing with you guys).  This is pretty confusing and they did not keep spreadsheets or data about these, so I am having trouble tying all the volumes.  Could you also get me copies of the pipeline statements for August.  It looks like I am also missing one of the pipeline statements from July as well.  I do not have the statement for the loan of 73,416.  Thanks.  I am sorry this is taking a while, this deal is very complex and traders/schedulers have not kept good records.

PL

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Saucier, Darla
Sent:   Thursday, November 08, 2001 5:03 PM
To:     Love, Phillip M.
Cc:     James, Marlo C.
Subject:        RE: NICOR

Here's what we have done for all the month's involved.  I'll have to copy the Nicor invoices and get them to you.  I will bring those down to you tomorrow morning.

 << File: NICOR-rec.xls >>

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Love, Phillip M.
Sent:   Thursday, November 08, 2001 4:41 PM
To:     James, Marlo C.; Saucier, Darla
Subject:        RE: NICOR

can you get me the info on August for Nicor, according to Cora Pendergrass I need to see august numbers because some of July's invoice has august volumes.  I would like a copy of all the stuff you guys gave me for July.  Thanks.

PL

 -----Original Message-----
From:   James, Marlo C.
Sent:   Thursday, November 08, 2001 4:36 PM
To:     Palmer, B. Scott
Cc:     Love, Phillip M.; Saucier, Darla; Valderrama, Lisa; Anastas, Sherry
Subject:        RE: NICOR

Right now the parking and loaned deals that we did or do with NIPSCO are not being booked correctly in Unify.  The volumes are coming over onto Supply Verifications or Sales Invoices depending what we are doing.  These deals should be coming over to the service side so that I can be paying for these deals.  However, I do not have anything on the service side.  Therefore, I have a had to pay (paper) manuals to pay NIPSCO and Darla has outstanding A/R & A/P items since we do not invoice or pay NIPSCO for these deals.  I have requested that Marlene forward the service contracts that are currently in the system to verify what we have setup so that you can make sure the deals are setup and we can get these corrected in Unify.  I need to get my payables issues cleared up as well for the manuals I had to do to get them paid as interest was also charged.  If you need to meet up with Darla and I to show you what we have, please let us know.  The sooner we can get these resolved the better.

Thanks,
Marlo

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Palmer, B. Scott
Sent:   Thursday, November 08, 2001 4:20 PM
To:     Saucier, Darla
Cc:     James, Marlo C.; Love, Phillip M.
Subject:        RE: NICOR

Phillip is working on NICOR. I will work on NIPSCO. Marlo's e-mail was the first I have heard of this and it does not really describe what the issue is. Can somebody clue me in with the details? Thanks.

Scott

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Saucier, Darla
Sent:   Thursday, November 08, 2001 2:56 PM
To:     Palmer, B. Scott
Subject:        FW: NICOR

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Saucier, Darla
Sent:   Thursday, November 08, 2001 2:51 PM
To:     Love, Phillip M.
Cc:     McFatridge, Thomas; Valderrama, Lisa; PALMER, Scott L
Subject:        NICOR

Hi Phillip,

I saw your emails to Marlo James on the Nicor issue that said Scott Palmer would be taking over the Central desk.  I just wanted to see if it would be possible to put this on the highest priority.  Due to the current situation, we need to get this matter resolved ASAP to be able to clear off the balances left sitting on our A/R and A/P.  Let me know if there's any additional information that you would require from me. Again, I stress the urgency of resolving this.  Thanks for your help.  Please update me on any progress as soon as possible.

Thanks
Darla Saucier


i already did, silly.

Gerald.Nemec@enron.com on 11/06/2000 05:12:39 PM

To:   Mandy.Bowles@email.moore.com
cc:
Subject:  Re:

Really?  Something you care to disclose.

                    Mandy.Bowles@email
                    .moore.com                To:
gerald.nemec@enron.com
                                              cc:
                    11/06/2000 04:49          Subject:
                    PM

I am a sex machine.


AWESOME

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Miller, Jeffrey
Sent:	Thursday, September 20, 2001 4:57 AM
To:	Gilbert, Gerald; Forney, John M.; Day, Smith L.; Platter, Phillip
Subject:	FW: Home Finally!!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Jeffrey Miller" <jmiller79@houston.rr.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Jeffrey+20Miller+22+20+3Cjmiller79+40houston+2Err+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, September 19, 2001 8:18 PM
To:	Miller, Jeffrey
Subject:	Fw: Home Finally!!

----- Original Message -----
From: vzimmer2
To: jeffrey miller  ; cathy  ; carden  ;  yida07@aol.com  ; sheryl
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 7:41 PM
Subject: Fw: Home Finally!!

----- Original Message -----
From: janice  mason
To: deborah.c.ulrich@exxonmobil.com  ; dlyne@swbell.net  ; frogged5@yahoo.com   ; hilily88@houston.rr.com  ; labney@wt.net  ; mgallo@wt.net  ; Nu978@aol.com  ; roachette@aol.com  ;  sfbartley@yahoo.com  ; vzimmer2@home.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 10:15 AM
Subject: FW: Home Finally!!

  Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2001 10:40 PM     Subject: Home finally!

 I just wanted to drop you all a note and let you know that I arrived  safe and sound into Dulles Airport tonight at about 6:00. It was an interesting  flight. The airport in Denver was almost spooky, it was so empty and quiet. No  one was in line for the security check point when I got there so that went  fairly quickly, just x-ray of my bags and then a chemical test to be sure  nothing explosive was on them. Then I waited 2 1/2 hours to board the plane.  What happened after we boarded was interesting and thought I would share it with  you. The pilot/captain came on the  loudspeaker after the doors were closed. His speech went like this:  First  I want to thank you for being brave enough to fly today. The doors are now  closed and we have no help from the outside for any problems that might occur  inside this plane. As you could tell when you checked in, the government has  made some changes to increase security in the airports. They have not, however,  made any rules about what happens after those doors close. Until they do that,  we have made our own rules and I want to share them with you. Once those doors  close, we only have each other. The security has taken care of a threat like  guns with all of the increased scanning, etc. Then we have the supposed bomb. If  you have a bomb, there is no need to tell me about it, or anyone else on this  plane; you are already in control. So, for this flight, there are no bombs that  exist on this plane. Now, the threats that are left are things like plastics,  wood, knives, and other weapons that can be made or things like that which can  be used as weapons. Here is our plan and our rules. If someone or several people  stand up and say they are hijacking this plane, I want you all to stand up  together. Then take whatever you have available to you and throw it at them.  Throw ! it at their faces and heads so they will have to raise their hands to  protect themselves. The very best protection you have against knives are the  pillows and blankets. Whoever is close to these people should then try to get a  blanket over their head--then they won't be able to see. Once that is done, get  them down and keep them there. Do not let them up. I will then land the plane at  the closest place and we WILL take care of them. After all, there are usually  only a few of them and we are 200+ strong! We will not allow them to take over  this plane. I find it interesting that the US Constitution begins with the words  "We, the people"--that's who we are, THE people and we will not be  defeated. With that, the passengers  on the plane all began to applaud, people had tears in their eyes, and we began  the trip toward the runway. The  flight attendant then began the safety speech. One of the things she said is  that we are all so busy and live our lives at such a fast pace. She asked that  everyone turn to their neighbors on either side and introduce themselves, tell  each other something about your families and children, show pictures, whatever.  She said "for today, we consider you family. We will treat you as such and ask  that you do the same with us." Throughout the flight we learned that for the crew, this was their first  flight since Tuesday's tragedies. It was a day that everyone leaned on each  other and together everyone was stronger than any one person alone. It was quite  an experience. You can imagine the  feeling when that plane touched down at Dulles and we heard "welcome to  Washington Dulles Airport, where the local time is 5:40". Again, the cabin was  filled with applause. It has been a  very long day and one that I am glad is over. I have been constantly reminded  this day of the ar! ticle in JAAMT that Barbara Williams recently wrote where  she referenced the tornados in Oklahoma and said something like, "Do we get mad  and shake our fists at God in anger? No, we go on and conquer our fears and  continue our lives." It is my hope that is what we do now. Last night I saw a  program with college students where one of them said that at their campus there  are no more hyphenated titles, i.e., African-American, etc., everyone is just an  American. No one will ever be able to take that pride away from  us.

Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


Scott --

Can your assistant get a call in # for those in CA?

Jim

Scott Stoness@EES
04/13/2001 12:00 PM
To: Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, jbennett@gmssr.com@ENRON, Tamara Johnson/HOU/EES@EES,
Jeff Dasovich/Na/Enron@ENRON, James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, Leslie
Lawner/HOU/EES@EES, Leslie Lawner/HOU/EES@EES
cc:

Subject: Meeting 8AM Central Monday

We have agreed on a strategy, subject to Whaley/Delaney approval, to:
Scott Stoness submit testimony today advocating 2 part real time pricing in CA
Read other parties testimony this weekend from the perspective "Has somebody
filed testimony close enough to Stoness testimony, that we can cross examine
and brief to a favorable outcome?"
Meet on Monday at 8AM to decide whether to rescind Stoness's testimony.

The following dial in number and code corresponds to the Monday 8AM Central
Time meeting.
1 800 713 8600
68266 is PIN
Scott Stoness is host

Action Items:
All on To list above read and have opinion on 2 and 3 above
All on To list above meet on Monday at 8AM.  Meet in Stoness office if
possible.
Harry and Jeane polish Stoness testimony and wait to the last minute before
submitting it
Jeane ensure all on this To list get a copy of testimony, emailed as soon as
she gets it.

Scott Stoness


Regards,
Yana Kristal for
Maureen Raymond- Castaneda


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 02/20/2001
08:19 AM ---------------------------

Dawn C Kenne
02/16/2001 04:43 PM
To: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT,
John Swinney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey W White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jenny
Latham/HOU/ECT@ECT, EOL Call Center
cc: Torrey Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tara
Sweitzer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: New Bridge Monitor

This evening, the new improved bridge monitor will be migrated to the EOL
production environment.  Several new enhancements were created to make this
application more efficient.  Such as:

1.  The bridge will handle 20 messages/second, instead of processing 1
message/second.
2.  The screens will no longer jump around! (Yeah)  You can select and view a
transaction without having the screen update with new deals.
3.  Historical deal query - ability to select and process historical dates
very quickly.
4.  Sorting capability - you can query any of the eight column headers by
selecting the column and typing a risk book, trans. id, deal capture system,
etc. and it  will filter to that section.

Please forward this e-mail to your groups.  If you have any questions or
concerns with the new bridge monitor please contact me at 3-9353 or Tara at
3-4523.  We hope this helps, I know it has made our lives easier while
testing.  Also, feedback is much appreciated!

Thanks,
Dawn


Fred and Rebecca should be talking to Accounting about this. Do you want me
to respond to your email and copy them?

ckm


Sorry,

Per Jay's request we will need to cancel this meeting once more.  Jay is tied
up on EOL production issues.  Can everyone check their calendars for
Thursday, Jan. 27th afternoon say 2 or 3 p.m.

Please let me know ASAP.

Thanks so much,
Mary


Start Date: 4/9/01; HourAhead hour: 13;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001040913.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/9/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_OZZY
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM


I haven't read this yet.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/05/2000 04:12
PM ---------------------------

lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com on 12/05/2000 03:54:02 PM
To: kay.mann@enron.com
cc: kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com

Subject: Exhibits for Austin and LV Cogen Facility Agreements

 <<Exhibits to Gas Turbine Purchase Agreement - LV Cogen
redline_120400.DOC>>

 <<Exhibits to Gas Turbine Purchase Agreement - Austin redline _
120400.DOC>>

 - Exhibits to Gas Turbine Purchase Agreement - LV Cogen redline_120400.DOC
 - Exhibits to Gas Turbine Purchase Agreement - Austin redline _ 120400.DOC


I don't know why this is coming up now and why we don't address this at year
end in conjunction with the PRC process.


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  , 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now in the most recent version of Adobe Acrobat 4.0 and they
should print clearly from Adobe Acrobat Reader 3.0 or higher. Adobe Acrobat
Reader 4.0 may be downloaded for FREE from www.adobe.com.

(See attached file: NGstocksweeklychange.pdf)(See attached file:
NGstocks.pdf)(See attached file: AGA.pdf)

Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606  USA
Tel:  312-368-6149
Fax:  312-368-2281
soblander@carrfut.com
http://www.carrfut.com
 - NGstocksweeklychange.pdf
 - NGstocks.pdf
 - AGA.pdf


Finished visiting with counsel ..... we will need to start with the buyback
for Global Octanes 9am tomorrow


Shawn Steele
323-951-9000 (law office)
818-841-5210 (Rep. Party HQ)

If you need anything else, let me know.

-Bev


UserName: CAMPB54792

You have an electronic trade confirmation in your Inbox.  To retrieve your
trade confirmation you may login to Datek Online and choose Document Delivery
from the Account Services menu, or you may click on the link below:

https://tumble2.datek.com/posta?x=1-5307752-5284516-KT0BZORV

You have received this message because you subscribed to electronic delivery
for your Datek Online account.  If you wish to stop receiving account
documents via electronic delivery, you may cancel your subscription by
logging into Datek Online and choosing "Settings" from the
Account Services menu.

For more information please call Customer Support at 1-888-U2-DATEK, or send
email to support@datek.com.

Thank you for trading with us.

Datek Online Brokerage Services
Member NASD / SIPC


I would support 90 MW at Homestead.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rust, Bill
Sent:	Tuesday, June 12, 2001 10:03 AM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.
Subject:	LM6000s in Homestead

Kevin,

Greg Krause asked me what the desk thought of 90 MW of LM6000 generation in Homestead FL. I told him that the transmission looked very favorable for 90 MW (w/o other generation added in the area). What do you think about having the generation there from the commodity perspective?

Bill Rust


Note:  Stocks of heating oil are very high for this winter, affecting the
northeast and Florida markets' economics.  LB

-----Original Message-----
From: webmaster@cera.com [mailto:webmaster@cera.com]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 9:01 PM
To: clients@cera.com
Subject: High Inventories and Weak Jet Demand Shape the Heating Oil
Market - CERA Alert

Title: Atlantic Basin Heating Oil Markets Well Supplied Before Winter
URL(s):

http://www.cera.com/eprofile?u=35&m=2800;

***********************************************************************

HIGH INVENTORIES AND WEAK JET DEMAND SHAPE THE HEATING OIL MARKET

Atlantic Basin heating oil markets are comfortably supplied in the lead-up to
the winter 2001/02 heating season, and accordingly CERA expects much weaker
distillate-to-crude price differentials than those of a year ago.

*  Primary distillate inventories in North America are well above those of a
year ago, and German heating oil stocks are as much as 60 million barrels
higher then last year.

*  Weakening jet fuel demand effectively increases availability of refinery
distillate supply capability.

*  Distillate consumption in switchable applications in North America will be
much lower than they were last year, when a very tight natural gas market
boosted distillate demand.

**end**

Follow above URL for complete Alert (3 printed pages).

E-mail Category: Alert
CERA Knowledge Area(s): Global Oil

***********************************************************************
**************************************************************************************
CERAWeek February 11-15, 2002 - http://www.cera.com/ceraweek

SPECIAL OFFER: Register on-line before November 30th, and a 2-Day Pass
will be upgraded to a 4-Day Pass (maximum $1,800 value).
Day 1: Global Oil/Refined Products;
Day 2: Natural Gas/Global Energy;
Day 3 & 4: Electric Power
**************************************************************************************

To make changes to your cera.com profile go to:
http://www.cera.com/client/updateaccount

Forgot your username and password? Go to:
http://www.cera.com/client/forgot

This electronic message and attachments, if any, contain information
from Cambridge Energy Research Associates, Inc. (CERA) which is
confidential and may be privileged. Unauthorized disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this message or any attachments,
in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited.
Terms of Use: http://www.cera.com/tos
Questions/Comments: webmaster@cera.com
Copyright 2001. Cambridge Energy Research Associates


Response from Steve Kean:

Ken will be cosponsoring the event and asked us to do a PAC contribution.  I
think your points are most valid and we'll reduce to $2,000.

	Joe Hillings
	10/24/2000 03:07 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Carolyn Cooney/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Enron PAC Contribution

Joe Hillings
Enron
1775 Eye Street, NW
Suite 800
Washington, DC  20006
202-466-9145
202-828-3372 (fax)
email:  jhillin@enron.com

Steve: I understand that you are considering a $3,500 Enron PAC contribution
to Congresswoman Shiela Jackson Lee. Chris and Citigroup co-hosted an event
for Shiela last August in Washington which raised $17,000. Additionally,
Enron PAC contributed $1,500 for her primary race (she had no race) and
$1,000 for the general election. Her opposition is nominal. We have also
handled various personal requests for her such as tickets to Enron Field.

She has been helpful on several issues this year such as H1-B Visa and was in
India with President Clinton at which she spoke to the Power Minister in a
helpful way. Ken Lay and others jawboned her to get her vote in favor of PNTR
for China although I think she was bargaining with everyone as she frequently
does. Chris Long has developed a good relationship with Shiela but she seldom
seeks us out and I think her "delayed" position on PNTR for China was
unbecoming a representative from Houston. Houston will gain from PNTR for
China.

I would recommend a maximum of $2,000 to go along with our recommendation
that she be more attentive to our positions on leading issues.

Joe


Ned,

Attached for your handling is the Draft Confidentiality Agreement between ECS
and MarkWest.

Thanks,

Eric Gillaspie
713-345-7667
Enron Building 3886
----- Forwarded by Eric Gillaspie/HOU/ECT on 02/20/2001 02:06 PM -----

	Kay Young
	02/20/2001 01:52 PM

		 To: Eric Gillaspie/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: MarkWest Hydrocarbon CA Check

Hi Eric:

ENA had an agreement with MarkWest that expired January 6, 2001 re Possible
ENA debt or equity financing in connection with MarkWest's participation in
certain midstream gas processing plant projects in  East Lost Hills area -
Kern City California.

That is the only agreement I have with or pertaining to MarkWest.

Kay

Kay C. Young
Legal Specialist
Enron North America Corp.
713-853-6794 Phone
713-646-3393 Fax
kay.young@enron.com

	Eric Gillaspie
	02/20/2001 11:02 AM

		 To: Kay Young/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Ned Higgins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: MarkWest Hydrocarbon CA Check

Kay,

I've attached the confidentiality check form for your review, as well as, the
Texas Secretary of State records on the entity below.

Thanks,

TEXAS SECRETARY OF STATE, CORPORATE RECORD

Name: MARKWEST HYDROCARBON, INC.

Tax Address: 155 INVERNESS DR W STE 200
?????????????ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO 80112

Type of Corporation: FOREIGN PROFIT

Status: ACTIVE

Standing from Comptrollers Office: IN GOOD STANDING, NOT FOR DISSOLUTION OR
WITHDRAWAL

Status Date: 10/08/1996

Filing Date: 10/08/1996

Duration: PERPETUAL

State of Incorporation: DELAWARE

Registered Agent: CT CORPORATION SYSTEM

Registered Office: 350 N. ST. PAUL
???????????????????DALLAS, TEXAS 75201

Subsidiaries: MARKWEST MICHIGAN, INC.
?????????????????State: ? COLORADO
?????????????????% Owned:?100
?
??????????????MARKWEST RESOURCES, INC.
?????????????????State: ? COLORADO
?????????????????% Owned:?100

Tax Year: 1998

State Tax ID: 030118986824

Officers and Directors:
?
????FOX, JOHN M
????PRESIDENT
????(OFFICER)
????155 INVERNESS DR W
????ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO 80112
?
????O'NEILL, BRIAN T
????VICE PRESIDENT
????(OFFICER)
????155 INVERNESS DR W
????ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO 80112
?
????DENNEY, ARTHUR J
????VICE PRESIDENT
????(OFFICER)
????155 INVERNESS DR W
????ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO 80112
?
????GARVIN, ROBERT F
????VICE PRESIDENT
????(OFFICER)
????155 INVERNESS DR W
????ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO 80112

Number: 00112001-06

History:

? ?Date	Transaction
----------	-----------

10/08/1996	CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORITY
09/26/1998	PUBLIC INFORMATION REPORT FILED
09/26/1998	PUBLIC INFORMATION REPORT FILED
03/27/1999	PUBLIC INFORMATION REPORT FILED WITH REVISIONS
03/27/1999	PUBLIC INFORMATION REPORT FILED WITH REVISIONS
06/21/1999	PUBLIC INFORMATION REPORT FILED

06/21/1999	PUBLIC INFORMATION REPORT FILED
01/20/2001	PUBLIC INFORMATION REPORT FILED

Eric Gillaspie
713-345-7667
Enron Building 3886


>From: dawn thompson <dna_1993@yahoo.com>
>To: priscilla gilbert <priscillagilbert@juno.com>,  kristi jones
><kjones_77004@yahoo.com>, DANEL RAYBURN <danelrr@yahoo.com>,  Clayton Smith
><csmith@priorityit.com>,  jim thompson <jfthompson@shellus.com>,  sonya
>thompson <sthompson47@hotmail.com>
>Subject: Fwd: FW: Can You Believe It?
>Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 09:52:41 -0800 (PST)
>
>
>Note: forwarded message attached.
>
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Thousands of Stores.  Millions of Products.  All in one Place.
>http://shopping.yahoo.com/

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.

--0-1909002904-973619561=:16936--

X-Apparently-To: dna_1993@yahoo.com via web4902.mail.yahoo.com
Return-Path: <lupchurch@wm.com>
X-Track: 1: 40
Received: from 208.3.209.194  (EHLO shcrpx06.wm.com) (208.3.209.194)
  by mta413.mail.yahoo.com with SMTP; 07 Nov 2000 07:59:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by shcrpx06.wm.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
 id <WMCDT32Q>; Tue, 7 Nov 2000 09:56:42 -0600
Message-ID: <077FFAC43D46B643B3666825D0901674FEC043@shcrpx02>
From: "Upchurch, Lisa" <LUpchurch@wm.com>
To: 'Alan' <cancerman67@yahoo.com>, 'Allie' <AOsteen@swbanktx.com>,
 'Brynn' <bmpink@earthlink.net>, 'Calvin/Barb' <cbburrell@juno.com>,
 'Carolyn' <Cghashim@ev1.net>, 'Charles' <charlesray4@hotmail.com>,
 'Chris' <Chris.Mitchell@us.wmmercer.com>, 'Chris Rucker'
  <ruck_cie46@yahoo.com>, 'Clayton' <cog7@netzero.net>, 'Danny'
  <dkennedy@adt.com>, 'Dawn' <dna_1993@yahoo.com>, 'Derrick'
  <dgreen@thejaggroup.com>, 'Glen' <cupchu1481@aol.com>, 'Jack'
  <jackw@hendee.com>, "'John D.'" <CDorJohn@aol.com>, "'John M.'"
  <johnmachado105@cs.com>, 'Josalyn' <JMitchem@ViaNovus.com>, 'Katie'
  <kfitzpatrick@intellimark-it.com>, 'Kim' <kupchurch@bracepatt.com>,
 'Rey' <nvrey@aol.com>, 'Sherry' <sherry@funnyfaces.com>, 'Steph/Monkey'
  <BigBilBol@aol.com>, 'Stoney' <esumadtu@aol.com>, 'Susan'
  <susanok@hotmail.com>
Subject: FW: Can You Believe It?
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 09:56:25 -0600
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: <077FFAC43D46B643B3666825D0901674FEC043@shcrpx02>
Return-Receipt-To: "Upchurch, Lisa" <LUpchurch@wm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
 boundary="----_=_NextPart_000_01C048D3.483CD720"
Content-Length: 9780

This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

------_=_NextPart_000_01C048D3.483CD720
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset="iso-8859-1"

Subject: Fwd: Can You Believe It?

Thought you might like this:

Conveniently Forgotten Facts??
Back in 1969 a group of Black Panthers decided that a fellow Black Panther
named Alex Rackley needed to die. Rackley was suspected of disloyalty.
Rackley was first tied to a chair. Once safely immobilized his friends
tortured
him for hours by, among other things,pouring boiling water on him. When they

got
tired of torturing Rackley, Black Panther member Warren Kimbo took Rackley
outside and put a bullet in his head.  Rackley's body was later found
floating in a river about 25 miles north of New Haven, Conn.

Perhaps at this point you're curious as to what happened to these Black
Panthers. In 1977, that's only eight years later, only one of the killers
was
still in jail. The shooter, Warren Kimbro, managed to get a scholarship to
Harvard. He later became an assistant dean at Eastern Connecticut State
College.
Isn't that something? As a '60s radical you can pump a bullet into someone's

head, and a few years later, in the same state, you can become an assistant
college dean! Only in America!

Erica Huggins was the lady who served the Panthers by boiling the water for
Mr. Rackley's torture. Some years later Ms. Huggins was elected to a
California
School Board.

How in the world do you think these killers got off so easy?  Maybe it
was in some part due to the efforts of two people who came to the defense of

the
Panthers.  These two people actually went so far as to shut down Yale
University with demonstrations in defense of the accused Black Panthers
during
their trial.

One of these people was none other than Bill Lan Lee. Mr. Lee, or Mr. Lan
Lee, as the case may be, isn't a college dean. He isn't a member of a
California
School Board. He is now head of the US Justice Department's Civil Rights
Division.

O.K., so who was the other Panther defender?  Is this other notable
Panther defender now a school board member? Is this other Panther apologist
now
an assistant college dean? No, neither!  The other Panther defender was,
like Lee, a radical law student
at Yale University at the time. She is now
known as The "smartest woman in the world."  She is none other than the
Democratic candidate for the US Senate from
the State of New York----our
lovely First Lady, the incredible Hillary Rodham Clinton.

And now, as Paul Harvey says, you know (the rest of the story).

Pass
this on! She deserves the press................

------_=_NextPart_000_01C048D3.483CD720
Content-Type: application/ms-tnef
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
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------_=_NextPart_000_01C048D3.483CD720--


Debra and Dan -

Attached is a worksheet for another new Master Physical.  The counterparty is
Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District.

Please prepare a draft and send to:

Mr. Kent Price
Salt River Project
1600 N. Priest Dr.
Tempe, AZ 85281

Please email a copy to Kim Ward and also to me.

Thanks,

Jay


Rod,

Julia mentioned during our staff meeting yesterday that you had asked about
University of Houston alumni within GPG.  I attended night school at U of H
and received my MBA degree many years ago.  I'm not certain why you were
asking, but if you need volunteers, I would be willing to help out with
hosting, recruitment or interviewing of potential new employees.

Jeffrey McClellan is the president of cougars@enron and has a comprehensive
mailing list of all University of Houston graduates within Enron.  You may
want to contact him for this listing.  As you can see below, he coordinates
the alumni recruitment within Enron.  If you need any help, please give me a
call at ext. 3-5691.

Rick
---------------------- Forwarded by Rick Dietz/ET&S/Enron on 08/08/2000 09:24
AM ---------------------------

Jeffrey McClellan@ECT
08/03/2000 07:52 PM
To: Jeffrey McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  (bcc: Rick Dietz/ET&S/Enron)

Subject: HAPPY HOUR


Start Date: 1/29/02; HourAhead hour: 20;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002012920.txt


---------------------- Forwarded by Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT on
08/06/99 08:55 AM ---------------------------

Carol St Clair
08/06/99 08:44 AM
To: Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Restriced Master Agreements

Mark:
The only one that I have done recently is the one for Petrous LLC which does
not contain the trade option exemption rep from them.
Carol


================================================================
As requested, your News Alert for SNMM
follows from EquityAlert.com.
To edit/discontinue your alerts please refer to end of message.
PLEASE REVIEW THE NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER BELOW
================================================================

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-= Paid Advertisement -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

UNDERVALUED

Mercantile Bank Corporation (NASDAQ: MBWM) is one of the nation,s
fastest growing regional banking organizations.

Despite unprecedented asset growth and earnings performance for a
new banking organization, Mercantile is currently trading at less
than book value and only 10.5 times street estimated 2000 earnings.

Click here to learn more:
http://205.210.134.51/a1.asp?ID=1257aa

AOL USERS: copy & paste the link above into your browser.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Starnet Confirms Special Meeting Continuation; Company Extends Vote on
Reorganization Proposal

ST. JOHNS, Antigua, Dec 12, 2000 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- Starnet Communications
International Inc. (OTC-BB: "SNMM")("Starnet"), a leading provider of
interactive media and information systems for companies engaged in the
internet
gaming industry reported on its December 8 special shareholders meeting. The
special meeting of shareholders was adjourned and continued to 10 a.m. local
time on December 21, 2000 at the Royal Antiguan Hotel in St. Johns, Antigua in
order to establish a quorum and to solicit additional proxies on the proposal
to
reorganize into a U.K.-based parent company.

Shareholders who have not received their proxy materials or are having
difficulty with the voting procedure are asked to contact Starnet Investor
Relations at ir@snmm.com or (604) 608-2255, or alternatively the company's
proxy
solicitors and information agents, Regan & Associates, at 1-800-737-3426 or
(212) 587-3005.

As part of Friday's session, Interim President and CEO Fred Hazell discussed
the
reorganization proposal and conducted a question and answer session. Hazell
reaffirmed that the company believes the United Kingdom provides an
environment
more supportive of companies which are involved in the online gaming industry
than North America, and that the relocation will provide improved access to
sophisticated capital markets, amongst other advantages.

Information regarding Starnet's reorganization proposal and the special
shareholders meeting is also available from Starnet's corporate website,
www.snmm.com. The information is accessible by clicking on the "Corporate
Reorganization" link on the home page.

About Starnet

Starnet is a leading developer and producer of Internet technologies for
gaming
applications. The company's new software, Beyond2000, which began a phased
launch in August, 2000, will offer a full suite of gaming products, including
casinos, sports betting, bingo, lotto, and horse racing. Games are available
in
a number of different formats including Java, C++, and HTML and comprehensive
marketing support software is also provided. For more information, please
visit
www.snmm.com or email sales@starnetsystems.net.

Starnet is an SEC reporting US (Delaware) corporation, which currently trades
on
the Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board. The company began trading in September of
1997 under the symbol "SNMM". Starnet is also listed on the Berlin and
Frankfurt
Stock Exchanges where it is traded on the Over-The-Counter market under the
symbol "SNM".

Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995: The statements contained herein which are not historical fact are
forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties that
could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the
forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, certain delays in
testing and evaluation of products and other risks detailed from time to time
in
Starnet's filings with the Securities & Exchange Commission. We assume no
responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of these statements and are
under no duty to update any of the forward-looking statements contained herein
to conform these statements to actual results. This is not an offer to sell
or a
solicitation of an offer to purchase any securities.

CONTACT:          Starnet Communications International Inc.
Rob Grace, (604) 608-2255
Investor Relations Manager
North American Toll Free- 1-888-883-0833
Email - ir@snmm.com
Or
Ogilvy Public Relations Worldwide
Amy Mumma, (212) 884-4036

URL:              http://www.businesswire.com
Today's News On The Net - Business Wire's full file on the Internet
with Hyperlinks to your home page.

Copyright (C) 2000 Business Wire.  All rights reserved.

-0-

KEYWORD:          INTERNATIONAL LATIN AMERICA
INDUSTRY KEYWORD: E-COMMERCE
INTERNET
SOFTWARE
GAMING

****************** TO EDIT YOUR EQUITY ALERTS ********************
To unsubscribe or edit your alerts, visit
http://www.equityalert.com/alerts.asp?uid=alewis34&xid=40352
******************************************************************

***IMPORTANT NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER REGARDING THIS COURTESY EMAIL**
At your request, as a subscriber to our service, this email alert
is being sent to you as a courtesy and is for information purposes
only.  We are a financial news re-distributor.  We are not an
investment advisory and do not purport to tell or suggest which
companies you should monitor or which securities you should
purchase or sell.
In addition to the information regarding the company you are
monitoring (the &Monitored Company8), this email contains an
advertisement describing a product, service or company for which we
received a fee, at our normal advertising rates of $55 per 1,000 e-
mails (subject to volume and other discounts), from the advertising
company.  In addition, not withstanding our policy of prohibiting
employees from buying or selling securities of an advertising
company for a period of 20 days following dissemination of the
advertisement, we may not be able to effectively monitor our
employees to ensure compliance with the same. Consequently, there
may be sales and/or purchases of such securities by our employees
prior to, during and immediately following the dissemination of the
advertisement.
Please note that (1) this email may not contain the full text of
the press release issued by, or the research or other reports
regarding, the Monitored Company; and (2) the text of the
advertisement, the press release and/or reports were obtained from
third party sources and were not written, generated or edited by
us; accordingly, we make no representations or give any assurance
as to the accuracy or completeness, nor have we conducted any
independent investigations of, the disclosures regarding the
subject matter of such releases and reports.
Please note that links to the advertising company and/or Monitored
Company are provided for your convenience.  We assume no obligation
for the content of such sites.
All information contained herein should be independently verified
by you with the advertising company or with Monitored Company or
any other sources you prefer.
[THIS IS ONLY A SUMMARY OF, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO, THE &EQUITYALERT SUBSCRIBER AGREEMENT AND
DISCLAIMER.8 PLEASE VISIT
http://www.equityalert.com/home/disclaim.asp
FOR ACCESS TO OUR COMPLETE DISCLAIMER]
******************************************************************


Financial Desk
State's Utilities Could Be in Hot Water as Bills Are Due Power: Whether they
can collect funds for escalating costs is a question that worries Wall
Street, others.
CHRIS KRAUL

09/22/2000
Los Angeles Times
Home Edition
Page A-1
Copyright 2000 / The Times Mirror Company
As the meter runs on California's electricity crisis, shock over this
summer's price spikes is giving way to a new concern: uncertainty over
whether and how the state's three investor-owned utilities can collect the
staggering amounts in power costs they haven't been allowed to pass through
to consumers.
The unanswered question is how high the bill--now $4 billion and
counting--will go, and whether consumers will foot all or part of it. And
that there are no easy answers--perhaps short of an overhaul of the state's
deregulated power market, or legislation from officials seemingly reluctant
to act--only adds to the growing anxiety.
Rate freezes in effect at Southern California Edison, Pacific Gas & Electric
and San Diego Gas & Electric, which serve about three-quarters of the state's
residents and businesses, are forcing the utilities to borrow an estimated $1
billion a month to cover their added wholesale costs. Those loans are
draining the companies' resources and threatening their financial structure,
analysts say.
The rising unpaid balance presents a longer-term burden that worries Wall
Street, the state's business interests and, of course, the utilities. If
passed along to consumers, the amount could ultimately negate the promised
benefits of cheap energy that were the reason for being for the landmark
deregulation of California's electricity industry. But making the utilities
absorb the entire "undercollections" would strike a grievous financial blow
to the companies.
The crisis also has created a potential time bomb for shareholders of parent
companies Edison International and PG&E Corp. Skyrocketing wholesale
electricity costs are canceling out deregulation's underlying assumption of
low-cost wholesale energy--and the projected generous retail margins with
which utilities were to pay off nuclear plants and other uneconomical assets.
The deregulation law gave utilities until March 2002 to complete the payoff,
when open-market conditions would take over in their service areas. But with
wholesale electricity costs where they are, the "stranded asset" balances are
growing instead of shrinking--and posing an enormous potential hit for
shareholders, who would have to absorb the remaining "bad asset" costs after
the deadline passes.
Whether the companies' shareholders or ratepayers--or both--end up footing
the undercollection bill, all Californians could pay in the long run,
analysts say, if current market problems remain unresolved and the state is
seen as a less attractive place in which to do business.
How will it all shake out? Wall Street is as much in the dark as
Californians, said Lori Woodland, an analyst with Fitch Inc. of Chicago, one
of three debt-rating agencies to recently lower their outlooks for Southern
California Edison, PG&E, SDG&E and their parent companies.
"It's not clear how regulators view this issue," Woodland said. "They may
permit the utilities to recover their costs [from ratepayers]; they may not.
That's a big uncertainty, and it may remain this way for months. Meanwhile,
power prices are very high, and significant amounts of money are flowing out
the door of the utilities."
The uncertain prospects for collecting those billions of dollars also affect
stock prices, and PG&E in particular has slumped in recent days as the
implications register with investors. From a high of $31.64 on Sept. 11, PG&E
shares have dropped to Thursday's close of $23.19 on the New York Stock
Exchange.
Amid the finger pointing and doubts, many wonder if electricity deregulation
itself could be junked and the state's power industry re-regulated. Others
suggest that rate freezes be extended indefinitely or hope that the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission now investigating the California electricity
market will take corrective action to make it all better.
Although the parties involved all seem fearful of the dimension of the crisis
and doubtful of any near-term solution, consensus couldn't be less evident
among the major players on how to deal with it. Although all three utilities
agree the current market isn't working, they have not come forward with a
common plan to solve the crisis and aren't working on one, sources say.
Partial lifting of the rate freezes is advocated by PG&E Corp. and Sempra
Energy, parent of SDG&E, the first state utility to pay off its stranded
costs and thus be allowed to fully pass along wholesale costs to customers.
The state Legislature has since stepped in to freeze SDG&E rates after a
political firestorm fed by customer protests over bills that doubled and even
tripled during the summer.
Lifting the rate freeze would stem the tide of electricity undercollections,
a sum the utilities realize is not necessarily collectible in the current
political climate.
"We have to fix these retail rates, which mask the true cost of electricity
and which are creating the shortfall," said SDG&E President Edwin A. Guiles.
In San Diego, for example, the average price paid by SDG&E customers zoomed
from 11 cents per kilowatt-hour last year to 28 cents at its highest point
this summer, before the Legislature stepped in to cap the rates, bringing the
average price paid down to about 10 cents.
So tinkering with the rate freeze could be politically hazardous.
"The pain we saw in San Diego this summer is something we want to avoid for
our customers in Northern and Central California," said PG&E spokesman Jon
Tremayne.
PG&E is expected soon to formally petition the state Public Utilities
Commission to lift its rate freeze. The San Francisco-based utility argues
that the $2.8-billion value of its Northern California hydroelectric
properties, which under deregulation it is required to divest, would erase
its stranded costs and make it eligible to pass along wholesale costs to
consumers.
Southern California Edison's chief financial officer, Jim Scilacci, said the
utility could possibly be eligible to lift the rate freeze later this year if
planned asset sales bring high enough prices.
But with the legally mandated rate freeze in effect in San Diego, observers
doubt that the state would let PG&E and Edison revert to market prices.
In response, some consumer advocates are saying, in effect: Let the
utilities, which ignored warnings of the electricity shortages at the root of
the summer's price spikes, lie in the beds they made and pay the unforeseen
costs of deregulation themselves.
"Essentially this is the result of a deal gone wrong. It's buyer's remorse,"
said Michael Shames of the Utility Consumers' Action Network, a San Diego
watchdog group. "The utilities cut a deal, and now they don't like the terms
of the deal and they want out of it."
Somewhat more flexible is Ed Yates, senior vice president of the
Sacramento-based California League of Food Processors, whose energy-intensive
industry could be devastated by the full brunt of high wholesale energy
costs.
"What frightens us is that the utilities and the state could declare the rate
freeze over and we'd have a San Diego situation," Yates said, referring to
how the rising summer power costs made some San Diego County agricultural
products noncompetitive. "What we want is rate stability. But I don't see a
solution. There are powerful interests at work who don't agree on the goal."
State officials are divided, with some including PUC President Loretta Lynch
looking to the federal government to impose order. Gov. Gray Davis has
discussed holding an energy summit next month to try to hash out solutions,
but no date or agenda have been set.
"The governor is obviously aware of the problems that California utilities
are facing and continues to be committed to making deregulation work and is
calling on everyone involved to act in a responsible way," said spokesman
Steve Maviglio, adding that Davis has set aside much of October to work on
the problem.
Lynch made it clear she will be unreceptive to any solution that would have
consumers absorbing all of the undercollections and that resolving the
utilities' huge debts must come as part of a comprehensive overhaul of
California's dysfunctional electricity market.
"I don't think there is a simple solution. The utilities have a problem, I
agree, but the resolution is much more complex than having the ratepayer eat
the bill," Lynch said. "The answer lies in a broader solution of addressing
the wholesale energy market."
Unclear is how long Wall Street would wait for some kind of resolution before
downgrading utilities' debt, the next step after the negative outlook
revisions.
"There are obviously many challenges presented to the power industry," said
Standard & Poor's David Bodek. "The costs are very high and at the end of the
day have to be borne by someone. If it's the utilities, there are financial
implications that could impact credit quality."


greetings.  could you please call me at 415.782.7822.  thanks.
Jeff


ERENCE NUMBER:
>30202845530
01/28/02    NON-CHECK FINANCIAL DATA FOR REF. #    30202845530
ACCOUNT: 40781075      ENRON CORP-ECT CASH SVC
            AMOUNT      POST DATE  VALUE DATE   CODE      BATCH/TRACK       DUP
        229,940.00       01/28/02    01/28/02    479     650000000571         1
TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION
SAME DAY DR TRANSFER
         GID:LCT20280970800
         FED20020128B1Q8021C002203
         REF:      TWS000380273
         ORDER:    ENA CASH SERVICES
         CR BK ID: 021000021
         CR BK:    JPMORGAN CHASE BANK FORMERLY CHASE
          MANHATTAN BANK,N.A NEW YORK, NY 10004
         BENEF:    323009980 ENTERGY KOCH TRADING LP
         USER REF:TWS000380273
         DETAILS:PREPAY FOR JANUARY POWER
         INSTRUCT DATE:01/28/02 ADVICE TYPE:MAIL

ENTER  (1) Y


Yahoo! News	Edit Breaking News Alerts - Yahoo!

	Breaking News Alert	 edit
GAITHERSBURG, Md. _ FDA advisory panel votes for over-the-counter sales of
Claritin.

	 [IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]

If you no longer wish to receive this alert, click here to unsubscribe.
If you have questions, send us feedback.

Copyright , 1994-2001 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved. Yahoo Privacy Policy


Yes, I think it would be a great experience, and I'd encourage you to
continue to meet as many people as possible in the organization.  Jeff

Massimo Marolo@ENRON
11/07/2000 12:54 PM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Rotation

Jeff,
I have talked to Geoff Storey and he told me that rotating early should not
be a problem. I will also talk to Hunter asap. Thank you for offering to talk
to Steve Horn; I would greatly appreciate it. I will meet with him on Friday
morning.
Could I also ask you for your general opinion on this rotation  and whether
you see it as a good experience?

Thanks for everything
Massimo


Sara-

Pursuant to my voicemail message of yesterday, it would be very helpful if
you would assist me in locating the Service Agreements relating to the
captioned matters.

Thanks,

John


Ann:
Sorry for the late response.  The best that I can do is early next week as I
am off Friday and tomorrow is full.
Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)


The final International Chemical Market Pulp Statistics - Flash Report for
September 2001
 is now available on Economics Online. www.pppc.org/econ/ - Flash Reports /
Market Pulp.

Should you have any questions concerning the content of this report, please
do not hesitate to contact
Joey Ducharme, at (514) 861-8849 or by e-mail at jducharme@pppc.org.

For questions or comments concerning Economics Online, please contact:

Doreen Olkowicz
Manager, Statistics and Online Services
T (514) 861-8851    F (514) 866-4863    E-mail  dolkowicz@pppc.org


The report named: Violation/Notification Memo <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=60&report_name=Violation/Notification+Memo&category_cd=2&category_name=ENRON%20CONSOLIDATED&toc_hide=1&sTV1=2&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=11/08/2001>, published as of 11/08/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.

Publisher's Notes:

FINAL


Two words about my after work activities.  Proper Pumpitude!!  I have to work
that cheeseburger off.  Why don't I call you on your cell when I get showered
up and if your already past mi casa or at the bar, I will just meet you
there.  Sound good?

	bswaldrop@aol.com
	03/08/2001 02:12 PM

		 To: Gerald.Nemec@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: FYI

Boy, you timed that pretty good.  Just walked back in about 10 minutes ago.

I am thinking that I will be here at least until 7 pm.  I will then run home
and walk Sophie and probably be able to either come by your place or just
meet you at Little Woodrows by 8:00.  How does that work for your schedule?
What are you planning on doing after work!

That Cheeseburger sounds good.  I had a cold Grilled Ham and Cheese.  They
ordered it before I left for my appt and then it had ben sitting here for
about an hour before I got ot eat.  Yum Yum Kitty!


Please review the Collateral Threshold amount language added as item 12 to
the Firm GTC.  The 3rd party debt default language was added as a triggering
event.


PORTFOLIO REPORT - from Lycos Finance
Thursday, Jan 10 2002 (generated at 03:00 PM PST)

Symbol      Close               Change     Today +/-             Total Return
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BEOS        0.102     -0.008  (-7.27%)        $-8.00       $102.00  (-99.42%)
EEX          2.25      -0.05  (-2.17%)       $-50.00      $2250.00  (-18.18%)
GW           2.86      -0.05  (-1.71%)      $-750.00     $42900.00  (+34.59%)
KCS          2.79      -0.29  (-9.41%)     $-4350.00     $41850.00 (+123.20%)
KEG          8.28      -0.12  (-1.42%)     $-1200.00     $82800.00  (+57.71%)
MHR          7.95      -0.10  (-1.24%)      $-500.00     $39750.00  (+98.75%)
TMR          3.71      -0.09  (-2.36%)     $-1350.00     $55650.00  (-17.56%)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Totals                                     $-8208.00    $265302.00  (+25.81%)

Index          Last              Change
---------------------------------------
DOW Jones  10067.86    -26.23  (-0.25%)
NASDAQ      2047.24     +2.35  (+0.11%)
SP500       1156.55     +1.41  (+0.12%)

=============================================================================
                  Are you Trading online?  Need to get better?
                  Try QCharts--The Ultimate Trading Platform.
                              Check it out today!
               http://finance.lycos.com/home/qcharts/default.asp
=============================================================================

=============================================================================
UNSUBSCRIBE OR CHANGE PREFERENCES
---------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this and all Lycos Finance portfolio emails, send
email to unsubscribe@news.quote.com with REMOVE in the subject field.
Please be sure that you are emailing using the same account to which
this email was addressed.

Don't want this email?  Want it at a different time?  Or in summary form?
Click here to go to your Quote.com eMail Command Center.  All your options
can be changed here.

http://finance.lycos.com/home/portfolio/prefs.asp?FG=94C037AB-8875-438C-8C27-8F714F5D4461
=============================================================================


Donna:  It's been awhile since we last spoke about advising Enron companies
of existing brokerage accounts.  It has also been determined (in legal) that
the accounts will remain with ME and not move to Alan A.  I have some
temporary assistance in that an A&K lawyer, Jason Peters, is working up here
for another few weeks.  I was hoping that we could all meet and put our
"project" into action.  Please give me a call and suggest some time when we
may meet.  Thanks.  Sara


i am not dating her.  i only went out with her a few times.  i doubt we will go out again.  how about you?  have you been dating a lot lately?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Allen, Jill (US - Houston)" <jilallen@deloitte.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Allen+2C+20Jill+20+28US+20-+20Houston+29+22+20+3Cjilallen+40deloitte+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Monday, May 21, 2001 10:25 AM
To:	Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:	RE:

i'm staying in town this weekend, but don't have any plans yet.  we might go
tubing or maybe a pool party....not sure yet.
so are you still dating the girl you met on St. Patrick's day?  how is that
going?

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 10:10 AM
To: Jilallen
Subject: RE:

this weekend i had to go to baton rouge for an engagement party.  i am
going to stay in town this weekend.  i might try to go tubing or something
like that.  what did you do this weekend?  are you in town for memorial
day?

This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information
intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law.  If
you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and are
hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.


i took the vote down, we will only vote on trades later in the year

From:  Harry Bucalo
  08/24/2000 08:58 AM

To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: trades

Eric:
where in the website do I vote on the trade?

Thanks
Harry B.


The following reports have been waiting for your approval for more than 4 days.  Please review.

Owner: Justin K Rostant
Report Name: Rostant 112001
Days In Mgr. Queue: 5


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 10/13/2000
09:38 AM ---------------------------

"hollyw" <hollyw@email.msn.com> on 10/12/2000 03:41:28 PM
To: "Sheri Thomas" <Sheri.Thomas@enron.com>, "Raymond Paterson"
<ray_paterson@hotmail.com>, "Lori Horrocks" <loroks@yahoo.com>, "Len"
<bigusdickus70@hotmail.com>, "KRISTI GIRON" <KRISTI.GIRON@cfisd.net>, "John
Schmitz" <jschm@telxon.com>, "Jim Miller" <jraggie1@pdq.net>, "Janine Gregor"
<janine.gregor@talk21.com>, "Gregor, Lynn C" <GregorLC@bp.com>, "Diego
Gotthelf" <dygotthelf@hotmail.com>, "Debbie Hall" <gmind@icsi.net>, "Darron C
Giron" <Darron.C.Giron@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Fw: This Is the Captain Speaking

----- Original Message -----
From: "Warren, Stacy" <swarre02@coair.com>
To: "Ugly Boo (E-mail)" <hollyw@email.msn.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2000 10:27 AM
Subject: FW: This Is the Captain Speaking

>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian & Cyndi Clark [mailto:bcclarks@worldnet.att.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2000 8:14 PM
> To: Gary Nathanson; Jerry T. Clark; Jim McLatchie; Kim McColley; Lisa
> Clark; Lori Coy; Larrry Remmert; Brian Clark
> Subject: This Is the Captain Speaking
>
>
> .
>
> A pilot got on the loudspeaker shortly after takeoff and said to the
> passengers, "Folks, welcome aboard flight seven eighty-nine to Cleveland.
> We'll be flying at thirty-five-thousand feet, and expect to land in an
hour
> and a half. Just sit back, relax, and enjoy the flight."
>
> Forgetting to turn off the microphone, he turned to his copilot, yawned,
and
> said, "Why don't you take over for a while? I'm going to take me a big
> healthy shit, and then I'm gonna fuck the brains outta that pretty blonde
> flight attendant working in coach."
>
> His announcement went over the whole plane. The pretty blonde flight
> attendant in coach heard this and exclaimed, "Oh my God!" and started
> running towards the cockpit.
>
> An old lady sitting in an aisle seat stopped her and said, "Relax honey,
> he's gotta take a shit first."
>
>


Salt River Project, in an effort to bring resolution to the mainline and
receipt point allocation issues pending in the above-captioned proceedings,
is filing today (and serving hard copies of) the attached "Motion of SRP for
Adoption of Strawman Alternative to March 28, 2000 Proposal of El Paso
Natural Gas Company".  Unlike any other proposal before it, it seeks to
weave into one workable solution, the concerns raised by shippers in their
initial and reply comments filed in the Order 637 proceeding, as well as
address the 3 complaints.  It is a share-the-pain proposal among CD -
Converted FR - and El Paso.  Under it, FR shippers would convert to CDs at
levels reflecting actual usage over the past 5 years, weighted to the
present. It assures each westward flowing firm shipper, based on the current
physical mainline capacity (including L. 2000), 93.1%(winter) and 94.2%
(summer) of their contractual entitlement.  On a daily basis, all westward
FT shippers are assured of receiving approximately 60% of their 93.1 and
94.2% allocation from the San Juan.  FT-2 shippers would continue to be
served off the top.  This Strawman adopts the in-line pooling methodology
set forth in SoCal Gas' initial comments.  It includes North and South
system segmentation rights, and narrowly defined demand charge credits for
unprovided capacity as long as there is a shortfall.  Provision is made to
encourage turn-back of capacity and to have capacity under expired contracts
dedicated by El Paso to meeting the approximately 7% shortfall. Provision is
also made to treat each primary delivery point as a receipt point, and to
give priority to Alternate Receipt- to- Primary Delivery point in the
systemwide scheduling process, all intended to encourage a strong
supplemental market to meet peak seasonal needs.

This Strawman Alternative is not filed as an offer of settlement, but as a
basis for a merits decision, eliminating the need for lengthy evidentiary
hearings, and providing certainty and flexibility to the system once
implemented.  Alternatively, we have left it to the Commission to decide
whether other procedures should be adopted.  Because it is a motion, it may
be responded to within 15 days of filing.  SRP strongly urges each shipper
and state commission to contact SRP for answers to any questions before
taking a position in response to the motion.  Any shipper that has questions
but does not seek answers, but merely sticks to their litigation position
will only be delaying resolution. This proposal is a viable
compromise...everyone gains and everyone loses something.  That is why it
works.  We look forward to hearing from you and reading your constructive
comments.  Joel Greene
 <<SRPstrawman.cvr.doc>>  <<SRPSTrawmanfiled11-13.doc>>  <<Attachment 1
filed 11-13.doc>>  <<Attachments 2-12 filed11-13.ppt>>  <<Attachment 13
filed 11-13 .xls>>
Energy Advocates LLP
202-371-9889
202-371-9025 (fax)
jlgreene@energyadvocates.com

 - SRPstrawman.cvr.doc
 - SRPSTrawmanfiled11-13.doc
 - Attachment 1 filed 11-13.doc
 - Attachments 2-12 filed11-13.ppt
 - Attachment 13 filed 11-13 .xls


---------------------- Forwarded by Rob G Gay/NA/Enron on 12/11/2000 09:59 AM
---------------------------

"Jones, Matthew" <MNJ@dentonwildesapte.com> on 11/30/2000 01:25:58 PM
To: "'Rankin, Cliff (V&E)'" <crankin@velaw.com>, "'Barquin, John'"
<jbarquin@velaw.com>
cc: "'Dutton, Chris'" <Chris.M.J.Dutton@SI.shell.com>, "'Gay, Rob (Enron)'"
<rob.g.gay@enron.com>, "'Tarry, Steve (V&E)'" <starry@velaw.com>, "''Novak,
John (Enron)'" <john.novak@enron.com>, "Pirrie, Andrew"
<AYP@dentonwildesapte.com>

Subject: ECA

I attach DWS/Shell comments on the latest version of the ECA.  The comments
appear in the text in bold caps, underlined.

The following also need to be included in the draft:

1.  provisions for sponsor guarantee buyout, once agreed; and

2.  a provision along the lines of Section 7.06 of the TBS Security
Agreement (relating to step-in to the TBS agreements) so as to give
SOTL/Enron Corp privity in relation to these rights.  (This point was agreed
with Mary some time ago in one of the New York meetings.)

Consideration also needs to be given as to whether there should be express
recognition of the rights of STDC and Enron Netherlands to subscribe subdebt
under the ECA.

Regards

_____________________________________

Matthew Jones
Denton Wilde Sapte
One Fleet Place  London  EC4M 7WS  UK
Tel: +44 (0)20 7246 7500
Fax: +44 (0)20 7246 7777
E-mail: mnj@dentonwildesapte.com
_____________________________________

 <<DWSShell comments on ECA.DOC>>

******************************************************************************
**
This e-mail is from Denton Wilde Sapte.  Our web site is at
http://www.dentonwildesapte.com A list of our partners may be inspected at
our principal place of business, which is at Five Chancery Lane, Clifford's
Inn, London, EC4A 1BU, UK.  Our central telephone number is (0)20 7242 1212.

This e-mail (including any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s)
named above.  It may contain confidential or privileged information and
should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person.  If you are
not a named recipient, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail from
your system.

******************************************************************************
**
 - DWSShell comments on ECA.DOC


MARKET NOTICE
January 7, 2002
New CAISO Energy Management System (EMS) Cutover
ISO Market Participants:
On Sunday, December 30, 2001, the California ISO cutover its grid operations
to a new Energy Management System (EMS).  The EMS is a computer-based system
used to monitor the real-time performance of the various elements of an
electric system, and to control generation and manage transmission
facilities. The system monitors electric transmission grid status, energy
flowing from power plants, adjusts the output of plants in response to
changes in power demand on the Grid, communicates with ISO scheduling
systems and reports on plant outages.
The implementation and final cutover of the new EMS into production was the
culmination of a year-long effort of the CAISO, in partnership with ABB
Network Management of Houston, Texas, to replace the previous CAISO Energy
Management System.
If you have questions or would like additional information, please contact
Kyle Hoffman at khoffman@caiso.com <mailto:khoffman@caiso.com>  or (916)
608-7057.
Client Relations Communications.0715
CRCommunications@caiso.com <mailto:CRCommunications@caiso.com>


Yes. Let's do 1:30 for an internal call.  I'll get Suzanne to send out the
dial-in instructions.  Let's make sure that the GE guys know NOT to call in.
Thanks!.  I know that John Schwartzenburg will be late since he is
TurboParking until 2 pm but let's proceed at 1:30.

	Scott Dieball@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	05/16/2001 07:15 AM

		 To: Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: John G Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kay
Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron@ECT, John
Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 Subject: Re: GE- Standard Domestic Contract- Need your help

Read your notes re scheduling a call w/ or w/o GE.  From John's and my
perspective, it seems that we should first have an internal call re the
consolidation of our assignments from weeks past  into Peter's draft contract
and then send to GE for their review and follow up call either later this
week or next.  Steve Swift is OK with this approach.

At the moment we seem to be knee deep w/GE and Owner on Arcos and suspect
that 9:30 CST (3:30 London time) will be difficult for us to call in.
Instead, 1:30 CST would work better for us.

If this works for the Houston gang could you let us know soonest and we will
let Mike and Steve know as well.

	Sheila Tweed@ECT
	05/15/2001 04:18 PM

		 To: John G Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc: Scott Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Kay
Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: GE- Standard Domestic Contract- Need your help

Would you all be in a posiotion to get together tomorrow morning at 9:30 am
Houston time to review the issues list and  talk about how we get to the end
of this process with GE.  We immediately need to start the drafting of the
Longview turbine contract and I'd like to see if we are close enough to get
that started.  Scott, today the extension to the Agreement in Principle
expires and we need to extend.  Can you tee this up with Steve Swift?  Our
meeting tomorrow will be in lieu of the regularly scheduled GE call.  I'll
let them know we will call them later this week or we'll talk next Wednesday,
but I would like to get through whatever we need to in order to get the
Longview Turbine Contract going.
I've talked to John Schwartzenburg about this and he is available tomorrow
morning.