HireSynergy
723 Main Street, suite 511
Houston, TX 77002

-----Original Message-----
From: Darron.C.Giron@enron.com [mailto:Darron.C.Giron@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 9:17 AM
To: birgit@hiresynergy.com
Subject: RE: Birgit's Contact Info: 713-222-7667

1pm is best for me.

DG

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "Birgit D. Kamps" <birgit@hiresynergy.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Monday, November 19, 2001 9:17 AM
   To:     Giron, Darron C.
   Subject:  RE: Birgit's Contact Info: 713-222-7667

   Hi Darron,
   We could meet tomorrow - 9am; 10am or 1pm?
   Happy Thanksgiving week,
   Birgit.
   -----Original Message-----
   From: Darron.C.Giron@enron.com [mailto:Darron.C.Giron@enron.com]
   Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 9:06 AM
   To: birgit@hiresynergy.com
   Subject: RE: Birgit's Contact Info: 713-222-7667

   Birgit,
   Rather than respond to your questions, I would rather meet face to face.
   When are you available?  Let me know.  Thanks
   DG

       -----Original Message-----
      From:   "Birgit D.Kamps" <birgit@hiresynergy.com>@ENRON
      Sent:   Wednesday, November 14, 2001 9:37 AM
      To:     Giron, Darron C.
      Subject:  Birgit's Contact Info: 713-222-7667

      Hi Daron,
      You sure have a big fan in Scott Crowell! I look forward to meeting
   you
      and being your "eyes and ears" in the market-place! Some of the
      positions I'm currently conducting searches for include a Risk
   Managers
      (85-100K+B); power-plant accountants (50-60K+B); Gas Schedulers
   (55-70K.
      To help me better understand your interests, please take a few
   minutes
      to answer the following questions, and/or email me a copy of your
   resume
      (which I will help you up-date) so I can match you to opportunities.

      1) Key requirements in your next position.

      2) Main areas of expertise/ years experience (n/a if resume attached)

      3) Current and desired compensation

      4) Key reasons you would consider leaving your current employer &
   your
      level of urgency in making a move:

      5) Companies you want to avoid working for and/or already have your
      resume:

      6) Companies you're interested in:

      7) Main achievements in your career (or we can cover this if we meet;
      our offices are located downtown on 723 Main Street, suite 511 at the
      corner of Main/Rusk, in the Houston Bar Center Bldg):

      Please note that our team of 8 recruiters are Big 5 Alumni and CPAs
      specializing in Accounting (including Tax), Finance and Risk
   Management.
      I look forward to working with you in the near future and answering
   any
      questions you might have. You may reach me anytime at 713-222-7667,
   or
      we could schedule a time to talk in the evening. All our
   conversations
      will be completely confidential.

      Best wishes,

      Birgit D. Kamps
      HireSynergy, Inc.
      Partner/ Houston
      (713) 222-7667 phone
      (713) 222-7660 fax
      723 Main Street, Suite 511
      Houston, TX 77002
      birgit@hiresynergy.com
      www.hiresynergy.com

      This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
      information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is
      protected by law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you should
      delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure,
      copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action
      based on it, is strictly prohibited.

   **********************************************************************
   This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
   and
   may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
   intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
   others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
   authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
   reply
   to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
   all
   copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
   intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence
   a
   binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
   affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
   be
   relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
   Thank you.
   **********************************************************************


Grigsby would like to make an offer to Bob Badeer.  If you are ok with extending him an offer I think we should offer the same terms as his Portland deal.  Do you remember what we offered?


_______________________________________________________________

This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read,
copy, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the
sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system.
Thank you.
_______________________________________________________________

     Attached in Word 97 format, please find the Southern California
Generation Coalition Motion to Compel Discovery Responses from Southern
Calfiornia Gas Company and Motion Requesting a Shortened Response Time.

     If you have any questions, please contact Norman Pedersen at (213)
243-2810 or e-mail at napedersen@jonesday.com.  Thank you.

(See attached file: LA1067936.DOC)

Jaki Hawkins (213) 243-2848
Secretary to Norman A. Pedersen

 - LA1067936.DOC


I would be interested in talking to Liz.  Please set up an interview for me
one afternoon during the next couple of weeks.  Thanks.

D


What is the volume price?

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


THIS IS A GENERATED EMAIL - DO NOT REPLY!

IF YOU NEED FURTHER ASSISTANCE, CONTACT THE ISC HELP DESK AT:  713-345-4727

The password for your account:P00503864 has been reset to:12623739


Good Afternoon Sara,

I have reviewed and modified our Annex II. It does work with the
confirmation. Please review and advise of any changes you may request.

Thanks again!

Jorge


Thanks so much, Vince.

Molly

Vince J Kaminski
06/29/2000 11:06 AM
To: Molly Magee/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Li Xiao

Molly,

My recommendation letter.

Vince

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Molly Magee                           06/22/2000 10:39 AM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Li Xiao

Vince:  Li has selected you as a reference on her application for a graduate
school tuition loan.  Thanks for taking the time to participate in this
process.

Molly


Attatched please find a contract payment summary for the LM 6000 turbines.

Feel free to contact me with any questions.

Rebecca Walker
713-345-7968


FYI.  Please keep confidential until further notice.  Important to note that
this was delivered with the understanding that NO ONE has agreed to the
specific language.  It was a quick turn around (at Hertzberg's request) to
get the original, negotiated agreement into Legislative language (i.e.,
Martian) as soon as possible so that Hertzberg could try to move on it in the
Legislature as soon as possible.

In addition, the Commission is likely to come out with its proposed "rate
agreement" sometime this week, and is likely to release DWR's "revenue
requirement" next week.  I heard from the Gov's financial advisor that Edison
and DWR EACH want 2 cents out of the PUC's recent 3 cent rate increase.  It's
going to get very interesting from here.

Best,
Jeff

----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 07/10/2001 04:11 PM -----

	"Simpson, Rick" <Rick.Simpson@asm.ca.gov>
	07/10/2001 04:12 PM

		 To: "'dhunter@s-k-w.com'" <dhunter@s-k-w.com>, "Simpson, Rick"
<Rick.Simpson@asm.ca.gov>
		 cc: "'Barbara Barkovich (E-mail)'" <brbarkovich@earthlink.net>, "'Dominic
DiMare (E-mail)'" <dominic.DiMare@calchamber.com>, "'Dorothy Rothrock
(E-mail)'" <drothrock@cmta.net>, "'John Fielder (E-mail)'"
<fieldejr@sce.com>, Gary.Schoonyan@sce.com, "'Phil Isenberg (E-mail)'"
<isenberg@hmot.com>, "'Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)'" <jdasovic@enron.com>, "'Keith
McCrea (E-mail)'" <kmccrea@sablaw.com>, "'Linda Sherif (E-mail)'"
<lys@a-klaw.com>, "'Linda Sherif (E-mail 2)'" <lysherif@yahoo.com>, "'John
White (E-mail)'" <vjw@cleanpower.org>, Ann.Cohn@sce.com, "Mike Kahl (E-mail)"
<mikahl@ka-pow.com>
		 Subject: RE: Final Legislative Language

You all are awesome.  Many thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Delaney Hunter [mailto:dhunter@s-k-w.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 1:56 PM
To: Rick.Simpson@asm.ca.gov
Cc: 'Barbara Barkovich (E-mail)'; 'Dominic DiMare (E-mail)'; 'Dorothy
Rothrock (E-mail)'; 'John Fielder (E-mail)'; Gary.Schoonyan@sce.com;
'Phil Isenberg (E-mail)'; 'Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)'; 'Keith McCrea
(E-mail)'; 'Linda Sherif (E-mail)'; 'Linda Sherif (E-mail 2)'; 'John
White (E-mail)'; Ann.Cohn@sce.com; Mike Kahl (E-mail)
Subject: Final Legislative Language

Rick-
Attached please find our final draft of legislative language per your
request. We are ready and willing to draft other sections or language as
needed by you or the Speaker. Please feel free to contact me if you have any
questions about the draft. Please note there are disagreements over two
sections of language and they are so marked.

FYI - I will be sending this document out to the entire Working Group for
their information.

Thank you,
Delaney

 - FINAL Legislative Language.doc


Hi everyone,
I've scheduled you to meet with Kelly McMillan from UBS Warburg for an overview of UBS's benefits coverage.  Your group presentation is today at 1:30 pm (Mountain) in Videoconference Room #1 (Toronto will be video conferenced in).  Just let me know if you are unable to attend and I will try to fit you in with another group.  Thanks......


Great, Vince -- I look forward to it.  I am available (hopefully!)
Monday:  7:30-12, EST
Tuesday: 7:30-9, 10:30-12, EST
Best regards,
Frank

Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com wrote:

> Frank,
>
> I am in Argentina and Brazil this week.
> I shall call you Monday - Tuesday next week.
> I would like to give you my comments
> and talk about a few other things.
>
> Vince
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>    From:   "Francis X. Diebold" <fdiebold@sas.upenn.edu>@ENRON
>    Sent:   Tuesday, October 16, 2001 10:33 AM
>    To:     Kaminski, Vince J
>    Subject:  weather research
>
>    Hi Vince, Sorry that our earlier call didn't work out.  I just wanted to
>    say that if you see any productive opportunities for joint work, don't
>    hesitate to get in touch with me.  Best regards,  Frank
>
>    --
>    Francis X. Diebold
>    WP Carey Professor of Economics
>    Professor of Finance and Statistics
>
>    Department of Economics
>    University of Pennsylvania
>    3718 Locust Walk
>    Philadelphia, PA 19104-6297
>
>    fdiebold@sas.upenn.edu
>    http://www.ssc.upenn.edu/~diebold
>
>    (215) 898-1507  telephone
>    (215) 573-4217  fax
>
> **********************************************************************
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
> **********************************************************************

--
Francis X. Diebold
WP Carey Professor of Economics
Professor of Finance and Statistics

Department of Economics
University of Pennsylvania
3718 Locust Walk
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6297

fdiebold@sas.upenn.edu
http://www.ssc.upenn.edu/~diebold

(215) 898-1507  telephone
(215) 573-4217  fax


The following is a list of the industries that ENA will be responsible for covering.  All other end-use customers will be covered by EES.  Based on your input, we have added the big three automakers, cement, primary metals and large agricultural.  In addition, ENA will have 8 companies listed in Aerospace/Other.  Please let me or John know as soon as possible if you have concerns, else we're done.

Regards,

Chris

	Industries:
Mining
Oil and Gas
Refining
Paper and Forest Products
Petroleum and Coal Manufacturing
Plastics and Rubber
Fertilizer
Rail Transportation
Auto Manufacturing - Big Three
Cement Manufacturing
Primary Metals
Large Agricultural

Aerospace/Other:
Boeing
Raytheon
McDonnel Douglas
Allied Signal Aerospace
GE Aircraft
Hamilton Sundstrand
John Deere
Newport News Shipbuilding


Julie,

You need to keep the nom and confirm at 3000 so that the buyback calculation
will work correctly.

D

From: Juliann Kemp/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/04/2001 11:49 AM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Air Products - plant down for 4 days.

Did you want me to confirm down on this meter  starting today.  (POPs).
Deal is at 3,000 and pathed at 0.
meter 1418 - thanks - Julie


big plans tonight?


---------------------- Forwarded by Tom Donohoe/HOU/ECT on 05/03/2000 10:37
AM ---------------------------

Ed Smith
04/20/2000 02:38 PM
To: Tom Donohoe/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

---------------------- Forwarded by Ed Smith/HOU/ECT on 04/20/2000 02:37 PM
---------------------------

Jeff D Davis
04/19/2000 02:11 PM
To: Ed Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

 - WHIPTHEW.EXE


***  Respond to Debra Davidson by April 30 ***

Trading, Origination, Asset Services, and Community Affairs have purchased a
box suite (17 seats) at PGE Park.  This entitles these groups the opportunity
to have a total of 17 people attend each home Beavers and Timbers game.  The
Enron PGE Park Committee (comprised of some employees from the groups above)
is working together to ensure equitable distribution of tickets so that
everyone on the floor will have an opportunity to attend games.

In order to allocate tickets in the most beneficial way to those who are
interested, please respond to the following questions by Monday afternoon,
April 30.  If you would prefer to reply verbally, stop by Debra's desk and
she will write them down.  Debra also has information about the games if you
have questions.

Are you interested in attending any Timbers soccer games?
If yes to Timbers games, about how many games would you like to attend?
If yes to Timbers games, how many tickets would you be interested in getting?

Are you interested in attending any Beavers baseball games?
If yes to Beavers games, about how many games would you like to attend?
If yes to Beavers games, how many tickets would you be interested in getting
for each game?

If you have no interest in attending Beavers or Timbers games, please let
Debra know.

Keep in mind that there must be at least one Enron employee with guests.
Tickets cannot be given away or sold.  Contact Debra if you have any
questions.


Please net longs and shorts for DIA and DYN.   I will do almost all trades on-line, therefore, I would like some mechanism to make all trades net on the Holdings page.

Kevin Presto
East Power Trading
Phone:  713-853-5035
Cell:  713-854-3923
Fax:  713-646-8272


---------------------- Forwarded by Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT on 03/12/2001
10:36 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Ken Rice and Kevin Hannon @ ENRON                           03/09/2001
10:10 PM

Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: All Enron Worldwide employees
cc:
Subject: Enron ends exclusive agreement with Blockbuster

As you are aware, Enron signed an agreement with Blockbuster Inc. last summer
to launch an entertainment on-demand service.  We announced today that we are
discontinuing our exclusive relationship with Blockbuster in order to expand
the offering by developing direct relationships with content providers and
distribution partners.

We have made tremendous progress toward our goal of becoming the leading
provider of entertainment on-demand over a digital platform.  We rolled out
the trial service in Seattle, Portland, Salt Lake City and New York in
December, and today subscribers are buying movies on-demand using the service
we created.

However, the exclusive relationship with Blockbuster has not yielded the
quantity and quality of movies needed to drive demand for this exciting, new
on-demand service.  Now that we have proven the concept, we want to take our
service to the next level by adding content and subscribers on an accelerated
basis.  We feel that this can be best achieved by pursuing entertainment
on-demand independently.

We intend to initiate discussions with various content providers for
delivering their content over the Enron platform.  We remain very positive
about the potential of this business for EBS and Enron and will keep you
apprised of our progress.


no thanks.

Andy Zipper@ENRON
11/28/2000 08:25 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Nymex Converter for Nov. 20 - 24

Do you care about seeing this report ? I use it for general benchmarking. Let
me know if you want to see it regularly.
---------------------- Forwarded by Andy Zipper/Corp/Enron on 11/28/2000
08:23 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Peter Berzins                           11/27/2000 04:23 PM

To: Andy Zipper/Corp/Enron@Enron, Rahil Jafry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Savita
Puthigai/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Torrey Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matt Motsinger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Simone La
Rose/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Nymex Converter for Nov. 20 - 24

If you have any questions, I would be more than happy to answer them.

Thanks,
Pete
x5-7597


Yes.  Let me know about follow=up plans.

Riccardo_Bortolotti%ECT%ENRON@eott.com on 04/25/2001 08:34:33 AM
To: Stanley_Horton%Enron.com%Eott@EOTT.COM, Mark_Metts%EnronXGate@EOTT.COM
cc: Michael_R_Brown%ECT@EOTT.COM, Eric_Shaw%ECT%ENRON@eott.com

Subject: Azurix/Enel

Stan + Mark,

as you are probably aware Enel is actively looking at acquiring water
businesses, particularly, but not only, in the UK .

They are also generally interested in opportunities in South America .

We are always looking at things that could attract Enel' s interest in
order to help us get our hands on some power and potentially gas positions
in Italy .

Moreover, Enel is cash rich and has proven to be a very generous buyer,
when it comes to acquisitions in areas of business ( gas, water and
telecoms ) that can help them to fulfil their vision to become  a multi
utility .

 I have got some decent contacts at the decision making level . Would you
be interested in discussing a potential approach ?

       R


COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION CORPORATION
                        NOTICE TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES
                                  MAY 31, 2001

Notice ID: 2767
5 - NO RESPONSE REQUIRED

SUBJECT:  WEEKEND/LATE DUTY CONTACTS-CUSTOMER SERVICES

Individuals from the following teams will be on duty (from 8:00 a.m. until
10:00 p.m.) in Customer Services on Saturday, June 2 and Sunday, June 3, 2001:

NOMINATIONS & CONFIRMATIONS

Team 2 (Saturday only)    304-357-3704
Team 3 (Sunday only)      304-357-3701
Team 4 (Sat. and Sun.)    304-357-3703

Individuals from Team 1 (Evening Shift) will be on duty (from 2:00 p.m. to
10:00 p.m.) next week (June 4 through June 8):

NOMINATIONS & CONFIRMATIONS

Team 1                    304-357-3708

Please note that the Columbia Navigator system is unavailable every Sunday from
11:00 p.m. until Monday at 6:00 a.m. for routine system maintenance.

If you have any questions, please contact your Account Representative.


Enron announces UNLIMITED discounted AstroWorld tickets for employees.

Due to overwhelming employee feedback, we have negotiated unlimited
discounted AstroWorld tickets for you and your family in place of the
traditional "Enron Day At AstroWorld."  We hope this will allow Enron
families to plan their fun-filled summer trips to AstroWorld at their own
convenience.  Enron AstroWorld tickets are $20.56 (Retail $50), which
includes admission for one, plus a $7 meal ticket to one of five restaurants
at AstroWorld.

Six Flags AstroWorld is a world-class family entertainment complex filled
with exciting rides and attractions, including 10 heart-pounding coasters,
over  40 blockbuster shows, interactive street entertainers and star-studded
concerts.  Enron families will be able to purchase unlimited tickets for use
anytime during the 2001 season.

Tickets will be on sale at Enron's Federal Credit Union, EB0399.  Visit the
credit union in person to make your purchases.  AstroWorld tickets will not
be mailed.  Enron employees who are not already Enron FCU members may pay by
cash or money order only.  All Enron Employees are encouraged to take
advantage of this great summer fun deal and may purchase tickets through
August 30th.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"Valada Brawner" <VBrawne@nicor.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, November 07, 2001 10:48 AM
To:	pmims@enron.com
Subject:	Security

With your knowledge, experience, and all those who know you, you would never have to worry about finding another job.  You might have to leave TEX.  But, mirant and elpaso is growing, just as well as AEP and Aquila.  There are a lot of rainbows on you side.  :)  By no means should you ever be worried.


pls send emma's resume to Lou Soldano.   Lou, please give me a call if you
have any questions about this lady.  Thanks.


Pup,

Howdy.   Back from the UK and Norway and am off for vacation to Boston and
area for a wedding in Chris' family at lunch today.  There will be 65 Flynns
there.  Hopefully it will be cooler.

Update for Dallas.  Golf - tee time for 4 (I didn't know if anyone else would
join us) at 1:28.  Spa - Brenda and Chris both have 1 1/2 hours massages at
1:50 pm.  If Brenda wants anything else she can call the Four Seasons but at
least they both have a spot.  I look forward to the weekend.

This is the most prepared we will have ever been for the weekend.

Mike

"Jonny Jones" <jjones@jonesenergy.com> on 08/18/2000 03:39:29 PM
To: <Mike.McConnell@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: Way to go!

We have a reservation and made one for you as a backup which I will cancel.
Golf & massages sounds great.   1 pm on Friday for golf would be great.  I
have the tickets covered.

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: <Mike.McConnell@enron.com>
To: <jjones@jonesenergy.com>
Subject: RE: Way to go!
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 15:58:14 -0500
Message-ID: <OF3055D4C1.A140DF20-ON8625693E.0072D483@enron.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Importance: Normal
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on ENE-MTA01/Enron(Release 5.0.3 (Intl)|21
March 2000) at08/17/2000 03:56:44 PM

Pelt,

We have made reservations for Fri. and Sat,  I didn't make yours but i
would move quickly.  Would you like me to set up a tee time and massages
for the girls?  I figured a 1 pm tee time?  Also what about tickets for the
game itself.  Will you have access as years gone by or does the search need
to begin?

Mike

"Jonny Jones" <jjones@jonesenergy.com> on 08/10/2000 03:24:24 PM

To:   <Mike.McConnell@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  RE: Way to go!

You are the first to be invited and there are no plans yet other than
showing up.  Will you handle your own reservations?

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: <Mike.McConnell@enron.com>
To: <jjones@jonesenergy.com>
Subject: RE: Way to go!
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2000 11:15:57 -0500
Message-ID: <OF1DEFF401.53763C48-ON86256935.00592009@enron.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;     charset="US-ASCII"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Importance: Normal
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on ENE-MTA01/Enron(Release 5.0.3 (Intl)|21
March 2000) at08/08/2000 11:14:46 AM

Pup,

That sounds great to us.  I take it you are not bringing the kids.  Have
you already made reservations and a tee time?  Who else is included in
this?  Also, am i interfering by inviting ourselves in your plans!

Mike

"Jonny Jones" <jjones@jonesenergy.com> on 08/07/2000 03:27:44 PM

To:   <Mike.McConnell@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  RE: Way to go!

We definitely are planning to go to Texas - O.U.  We are considering
staying
at the Four Seasons at Los Colinas.  Possibly a little golf and R & R mixed
in with the game.  It would be a bit out of the way.  We might go up as
early as Friday morning to play golf that afternoon.  Let me know what you
think.

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: <Mike.McConnell@enron.com>
To: <jjones@jonesenergy.com>
Subject: Re: Way to go!
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2000 14:51:12 -0500
Message-ID: <OF685B92C1.DEA0D3D1-ON86256934.0040B016@enron.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;     charset="us-ascii"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on ENE-MTA01/Enron(Release 5.0.3 (Intl)|21
March 2000) at08/07/2000 02:50:00 PM

Jonny,

Thank you so much for the email and kind words.  I was very moved by it and
you know I feel the same way.  I have become very reflective with the more
"success" that I have been fortunate enough to receive.  I am so thankful
and appreciative and although I have always been religious and spiritual,
it has grown more deeply.  I see so many people that have lost their
perspective and I pray that I will remain grounded and truly appreciate the
blessings that our family has received.  Chris and I often discuss how we
can help others and what can we do to really make a difference.

The Jones and the McConnells are truly very lucky.   Thanks, and give my
love to your family.

Mike

PS:  What about OU - Texas, do you have any ideas or plans already in the
works?

"Jonny Jones" <jjones@jonesenergy.com> on 08/02/2000 03:55:19 PM

To:   "Mike McConnell (E-mail)" <mike.mcconnell@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  Way to go!

Sometimes we fail to stop and reflect on events which are of significance
because we are so busy with our heads down accomplishing the things we
strive for.  I hope you are taking a moment to reflect and enjoy the
incredible accomplishments which you have achieved at such a young age.
You
and I are two of the luckiest people in the world and must always remember
to give back what we have been so fortunate to receive.

Congratulations and keep up the good work.  I am proud to call you my
friend.

Jonny


If you cannot read this email, please click here .

Earnings.com - News
Earnings.com 	[IMAGE]
	     AXP   29.17 -0.15    American Express Company Reports Third Quarter Net Income of $298 Million(millions, except per share amounts) Quarter Percentage Nine Percentage Ended Inc/ Months Inc/ September 30 (Dec) Ended (Dec) September 30 2001 2000 2001 2000 Net Income* $298 $737 (60%) $1,014 $2,133 (52%) Net Revenues** $5,478 $5,554 (1%) $15,770 $16,371 (4%) Per Share Net Income Basic $0  23 $0.56 (59%) $0.77 $1.61 (52%) Diluted $0.22 $0.54 (59%) $0.76 $1.57 (52%) Average Common Shares Outstanding Basic 1,324 1,326 -- 1,323 1,328 -- Diluted 1,335 1,361 (2%) 1,338 1,361 (2%) Return on Average Equity 14.2% 25.5% -- 14.2% 25.5% --   NEW YORK, Oct 22, 2001 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ -- American Express Company (NYSE: AXP) today reported third quarter net income of $298 million, down 60 percent from $737 million in the same period a year ago. Diluted earnings per share were $.22, down 59 percent from a year ago. Net revenues on a managed basis totaled $5.5 billion, down one percent from $5.6 billion a year ago. The company's return on equity was 14.2 percent.   Results for the third quarter were negatively affected by two significant items: a previously announced restructuring charge of $352 million pre-tax ($232 million after-tax) and the impacts from the September 11th terrorist attacks.   The September 11th events resulted in certain one-time costs and business interruption losses, including: provisions related to credit exposures to travel industry service establishments, insurance claims, and waived finance charges and late fees. The combination of these items totaled approximately $98 million pre-tax ($65 million after-tax).   The company also incurred costs of approximately $42 million since September 11th, which are expected to be covered by insurance. Consequently, these costs did not impact the quarterly results. These include the cost of duplicate facilities and equipment associated with the relocation of the company's offices in lower Manhattan and certain other business recovery expenses. Costs associated with the damage to the company's offices, extra operating expenses and business interruption losses are still being evaluated. The company expects that a substantial portion ofgh its Ists and losses will be covered by insurance.   The third quarter restructuring charge includes severance costs for the elimination of approximately 6,100 jobs and asset impairment and other costs, all relating to the consolidation and reorganization of certain business units, the scale back of corporate lending in certain regions, the migration of certain processes to lower cost locations, the outsourcing of certain activities, and the transition of certain processing and service functions to the Internet. These initiatives are expected to produce expense savings of approximately $325 million in 2002. A portion of these savings is expected to flow through to earnings in the form of improved operating expense margins and the rest is expected to be reinvested back into high-growth areas of the business.   In addition to the activities related to the restructuring charge, the company made strong progress on its global reengineering efforts initiated in the first half of the year and, as of September 30, had realized savings in excess of $700 million.   Net income for the third quarter, adjusted for the restructuring and one-time costs related to September 11th, was approximately $595 million, down 19 percent. On a similar basis, earnings per share were $.45, down 17 percent. The company's adjusted return on equity was 16.7 percent.   "While we were on target to meet prior consensus for third quarter earnings, the terrorist attacks obviously had a significant impact on the overall economy and we saw clear evidence of that as consumer spending, business travel and investment activity slowed after September 11th," said Kenneth I. Chenault, chairman and chief executive officer, American Express Company. "In light of the weak economy and financial markets, we are moving aggressively to lower our operating expenses. The progress we are making on our reengineering initiatives has freed up substantial resources for investment in our businesses with the strongest growth potential. This, along with the anticipated benefit of lower interest rates and the strategies in place to grow our franchise, positions us well to benefit when we see even a modest improvement in the economy."   Travel Related Services (TRS) reported quarterly net income of $248 million, down 51 percent from $507 million in the third quarter a year ago. Included in third quarter results are $195 million pre-tax ($127 million after-tax) of the restructuring charge noted earlier. Also included in the results are $87 million pre-tax ($57 million after-tax) of one-time costs and waived fees directly related to the September 11th terrorist attacks. Excluding these costs and the restructuring charge, TRS' net income would have been $432 million, down 15 percent from the third quarter last year.   TRS' net revenues rose two percent, as growth in loans and fee revenues were partly offset by a three percent decline in billed business and a 28 percent fall in travel sales. These declines reflect a substantial decrease in corporate travel and entertainment spending and consumer travel since September 11th. Prior to September, billed business growth for the quarter was about two percent as higher consumer and small business spending offset a decline in corporate travel and entertainment spending. Net finance charge revenues were higher, due to balance growth and wider net interest yields. This increase reflects a smaller percentage of loan balances on introductory rates and the benefit of declining interest rates during the quarter.   The provision for losses on the lending portfolios grew as a result of higher volumes and an increase in U.S. lending write-off rates and delinquencies. Marketing and promotion expenses were lower as TRS scaled back certain marketing efforts in light of the weaker business environment. Operating expenses rose, reflecting increased Cardmember loyalty programs and business volumes. These expenses were partly offset by the benefits of reengineering and cost-control efforts.   The above discussion presents TRS results "on a managed basis" as if there had been no securitization transactions, which conforms to industry practice. The attached financials present TRS results on both a managed and reported basis. Net income is the same in both formats.   On a reported basis, TRS' results included securitization gains of $29 million pre-tax ($19 million after-tax) and $26 million pre-tax ($17 million after-tax) in the third quarters of 2001 and 2000, respectively. These gains were offset by expenses related to card acquisition activities and therefore had no material impact on net income or total expenses.   American Express Financial Advisors (AEFA) reported quarterly net income of $145 million, down 46 percent from $269 million in the third quarter a year ago. Net revenues decreased 14 percent. Included in third quarter results are $62 million pre-tax ($41 million after-tax) of the restructuring charge noted earlier and $11 million pre-tax ($8 million after-tax) of insurance claims directly related to September 11th. Excluding these items, AEFA's net income would have been $194 million, down 28 percent from last year.   AEFA results reflect continued weakness in equity markets and narrower spreads on the investment portfolio. The weakened equity markets led to significantly lower asset levels and lower sales of investment products. As a result, management and distribution fees fell 15 percent.   Operating expenses, excluding the above-mentioned charges, decreased four percent from a year ago due primarily to lower sales commissions and continued reengineering and cost-control initiatives.   As of September 30th, approximately 4 percent of the company's $33 billion investment portfolio consisted of high-yield securities, down from 12 percent a year ago and 8 percent last quarter. The reduction reflects the activities to date to lower the risk profile of the portfolio and concentrate on stronger credits.   American Express Bank (AEB) reported a quarterly net loss of $43 million, compared with $7 million of net income a year ago. Included in third quarter results are $84 million pre-tax ($57 million after-tax) of the restructuring charge noted earlier. Excluding these charges, AEB's net income would have been $15 million, approximately double the earnings recorded in the same period last year.   While AEB sustained damage to its premises due to the September 11th terrorist attacks, the costs are expected to be covered by insurance. Consequently, these costs did not impact AEB's quarterly results.   AEB's business results reflect strong performance in Personal Financial Services and Private Banking. Results also benefited from lower funding costs and lower operating expenses as a result of AEB's reengineering efforts. These were offset in part by higher provisions for losses due to higher Personal Financial Services loan balances, and lower revenue from Corporate Banking as the company continues to shift its focus to Personal Financial Services and Private Banking.   Corporate and Other reported net expenses of $52 million, compared with $46 million a year ago. Included in third quarter 2001 results are $11 million pre-tax ($7 million after-tax) of the restructuring charge noted earlier.   American Express Company (http://www.americanexpress.com ), founded in 1850, is a global travel, financial and network services provider.   Note: The 2001 Third Quarter Earnings Supplement will be available today on the American Express web site at http://ir.americanexpress.com . In addition, an investor conference call to discuss third quarter earnings results, operating performance and other topics that may be raised during the discussion will be held at 5:00 p.m. (ET) today. Live audio of the conference call will be accessible to the general public on the American Express web site at http://ir.americanexpress.com . A replay of the conference call also will be available today at the same web site address.   This document contains forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. The words "believe", "expect", "anticipate", "intend", "aim", "will", "should", and similar expressions are intended to identify these forward-looking statements. The Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following:   Fluctuation in the equity markets, which can affect the amount and types of investment products sold by AEFA, the market value of its managed assets, and management and distribution fees received based on those assets; potential deterioration in the high-yield sector and other investment areas, which could result in further losses in AEFA's investment portfolio; the ability of AEFA to sell certain high- yield investments at expected values and within anticipated time frames and to maintain its high-yield portfolio at certain levels in the future; developments relating to AEFA's new platform structure for financial advisors, including the ability to increase advisor productivity, moderate the growth of new advisors and create efficiencies in the infrastructure; AEFA's ability to effectively manage the economics in selling a growing volume of non-proprietary products to clients; investment performance in AEFA's businesses; the success, timeliness and financial impact, including costs, cost savings and other benefits, of reengineering initiatives being implemented or considered by the Company, including cost management, structural and strategic measures such as vendor, process, facilities and operations consolidation, outsourcing, relocating certain functions to lower cost overseas locations, moving internal and external functions to the Internet to save costs, the scale back of corporate lending in certain regions, and planned staff reductions relating to certain of such reengineering actions; the ability to control and manage operating, infrastructure, advertising and promotion and other expenses as business expands or changes, including balancing the need for longer term investment spending; the Company's ability to recover under its insurance policies for losses resulting from the September 11th terrorist attacks; consumer and business spending on the Company's travel related services products, particularly credit and charge cards and growth in card lending balances, which depend in part on the ability to issue new and enhanced card products and increase revenues from such products, attract new cardholders, capture a greater share of existing cardholders' spending, sustain premium discount rates, increase merchant coverage, retain Cardmembers after low introductory lending rates have expired, and expand the global network services business; successfully expanding the Company's on-line and off-line distribution channels and cross-selling financial, travel, card and other products and services to its customer base, both in the U.S. and abroad; effectively leveraging the Company's assets, such as its brand, customers and international presence, in the Internet environment; investing in and competing at the leading edge of technology across all businesses; increasing competition in all of the Company's major businesses; fluctuations in interest rates, which impacts the Company's borrowing costs, return on lending products and spreads in the investment and insurance businesses; credit trends and the rate of bankruptcies, which can affect spending on card products, debt payments by individual and corporate customers and returns on the Company's investment portfolios; foreign currency exchange rates; political or economic instability in certain regions or countries, which could affect commercial lending activities, among other businesses; legal and regulatory developments, such as in the areas of consumer privacy and data protection; acquisitions; and outcomes in litigation. A further description of risks and uncertainties can be found in the Company's 10-K Annual Report for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2000 and other reports filed with the SEC.         * Included in 2001 net income are two significant third quarter items: a       restructuring charge of $352 million pre-tax ($232 million after-tax)       and one-time costs (including waived fees) of $98 million pre-tax       ($65 million after-tax) resulting from the September 11, 2001 terrorist       attacks.     ** Net revenues are presented on a managed basis.     (Preliminary)                              AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY                                 FINANCIAL SUMMARY                                    (Unaudited)     (Dollars in millions)                                           Quarters Ended                                            September 30,                                                                   Percentage                                        2001            2000        Inc/(Dec)     NET REVENUES (MANAGED BASIS)(A)       Travel Related Services       $ 4,466         $ 4,400            2%       American Express        Financial Advisors               908           1,052          (14)       American Express Bank             165             146            13                                       5,539           5,598           (1)     Corporate and Other,      including adjustments      and eliminations                   (61)            (44)         (37)     CONSOLIDATED NET REVENUES      (MANAGED BASIS)(A)             $ 5,478         $ 5,554           (1)     PRETAX INCOME (LOSS)(B)       Travel Related Services          $316            $721          (56)       American Express        Financial Advisors               194             387          (50)       American Express Bank             (62)              8            --                                         448           1,116          (60)     Corporate and Other                 (94)            (87)          (9)     PRETAX INCOME(B)                   $354         $ 1,029          (66)     NET INCOME (LOSS)(B)       Travel Related Services          $248            $507          (51)       American Express        Financial Advisors               145             269          (46)       American Express Bank             (43)              7            --                                         350             783          (55)     Corporate and Other                 (52)            (46)         (13)     NET INCOME(B)                      $298            $737          (60)     (A)  Managed net revenues are reported net of interest expense, where          applicable, and American Express Financial Advisors' provision for          losses and benefits, and exclude the effect of TRS' securitization          activities.     (B)  Included in 2001 income are two significant third quarter items, a          restructuring charge of $352 million ($232 million after-tax), and          one-time costs (including waived fees) of $98 million ($65 million          after-tax) resulting from the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack on          New York City.     (Preliminary)                              AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY                                 FINANCIAL SUMMARY                                    (Unaudited)     (Dollars in millions)                                        Nine Months Ended                                          September 30,                                                                   Percentage                                        2001            2000       Inc/(Dec)     NET REVENUES (MANAGED BASIS)(A)       Travel Related Services      $ 13,575        $ 12,898            5%       American Express        Financial Advisors             1,876           3,153          (40)       American Express Bank             481             447             8                                      15,932          16,498           (3)     Corporate and Other,     including adjustments      and eliminations                  (162)           (127)         (28)     CONSOLIDATED NET REVENUES      (MANAGED BASIS)(A)            $ 15,770        $ 16,371           (4)     PRETAX INCOME (LOSS)(B)       Travel Related Services        $1,783          $2,073          (14)       American Express      Financial Advisors                (243)          1,138            --     American Express Bank               (30)             26            --                                       1,510           3,237          (53)     Corporate and Other                (262)           (242)          (9)     PRETAX INCOME(B)                 $1,248         $ 2,995          (58)     NET INCOME (LOSS)(B)       Travel Related Services        $1,289          $1,460          (12)       American Express        Financial Advisors              (110)            790            --       American Express Bank             (22)             22            --                                       1,157           2,272  (49)     Corporate and Other                (143)           (139)          (2)     NET INCOME(B)                    $1,014          $2,133          (52)     (A) Managed net revenues are reported net of interest expense, where          applicable, and American Express Financial Advisors' provision for          losses and benefits, and exclude the effect of TRS' securitization          activities.     (B) Included in 2001 income are two significant third quarter items, a          restructuring charge of $352 million ($232 million after-tax), and          one-time costs (including waived fees) of $98 million ($65 million          after-tax) resulting from the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack on          New York City.     (Preliminary)                              AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY                           FINANCIAL SUMMARY (CONTINUED)                                    (Unaudited)                                         Quarters Ended                                           September 30,                                                                  Percentage                                        2001            2000       Inc/(Dec)     EARNINGS PER SHARE     BASIC       Earnings Per Common Share      $ 0.23          $ 0.56         (59)%     Average common shares      outstanding (millions)           1,324           1,326           --     DILUTED     Earnings Per Common Share        $ 0.22          $ 0.54          (59)     Average common shares      outstanding (millions)           1,335           1,361           (2)     Cash dividends declared      per common share                $ 0.08          $ 0.08           --                          SELECTED STATISTICAL INFORMATION                                    (Unaudited)                                            Quarters Ended                                             September 30,                                                                Percentage                                        2001            2000     Inc/(Dec)     Return on Average Equity*          14.2%           25.5%           --     Common Shares      Outstanding (millions)           1,336           1,329            --     Book Value per Common Share:       Actual                         $ 9.16          $ 8.44            9%       Pro Forma*                     $ 8.92          $ 8.68            3%     Shareholders' Equity (billions)  $ 12.2          $ 11.2            9%     * Excludes the effect on Shareholders' Equity of SFAS No. 115 and SFAS No.       133.       The Company adopted SFAS No. 133 on January 1, 2001.     (Preliminary)                              AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY                           FINANCIAL SUMMARY (CONTINUED)                                    (Unaudited)                                         Nine Months Ended                                           September 30,                                                                   Percentage                                        2001            2000        Inc/(Dec)     EARNINGS PER SHARE     BASIC       Earnings Per Common Share      $ 0.77          $ 1.61          (52)%     Average common shares      outstanding (millions)           1,323           1,328           --     DILUTED       Earnings Per Common Share      $ 0.76          $ 1.57          (52)     Average common shares      outstanding (millions)           1,338           1,361           (2)     Cash dividends declared      per common share                $ 0.24          $ 0.24            --                          SELECTED STATISTICAL INFORMATION                                    (Unaudited)                                         Nine Months Ended                                            September 30,                                                                  Percentage                                        2001            2000       Inc/(Dec)     Return on Average Equity*        14.2 %          25.5 %            --     Common Shares Outstanding      (millions)                       1,336           1,329            --     Book Value per Common Share:       Actual                         $ 9.16          $ 8.44            9%       Pro Forma*                     $ 8.92          $ 8.68            3%     Shareholders' Equity (billions)  $ 12.2          $ 11.2            9%     * Excludes the effect on Shareholders' Equity of SFAS No. 115 and SFAS No.       133.       The Company adopted SFAS No. 133 on January 1, 2001.       To view additional business segment financials go to:                          http://ir.americanexpress.com     SOURCE American Express Company     CONTACT:          Molly Faust, +1-201-209-5595, molly.faust@aexp.com, or Michael                   J. O'Neill, +1-201-209-5583, mike.o'neill@aexp.com, both of American Express URL:              http://www.americanexpress.com http://www.prnewswire.com
	 [IMAGE]  News provided by Comtex.    ? 1999-2001 Earnings.com, Inc., All rights reserved about us  | contact us  | webmaster  |site map  privacy policy  |terms of service


Thomas,

Ben and I had a meeting with Don on Tuesday. Please see below for the summary
of meeting:

ENA would sell to an IPP (AES or Calpine) a combination of EES short position
and peaking turbines.

ENA would generate profit from;
 1. spread between buying power from the IPP and selling it to EES at premium
- will be very thin
 2. having a call option on the peaking plant for the portion of excess
capacity of the plant
 3. fees from EES or/and IPP for providing/arranging capacity/off-taker
 4. better project financing by leveraging up more and having lower debt
cost, which would be possible by having off-taker (EES) - Not quite sure yet.

Next steps/Assumptions;
 1. Assume equity IRR of 12% after tax
 2. Match assets to EES load curve
 3. Dispatch assets into market when not to meet load @ENA curve ("RevenueM")
 4. Calculate transfer price to meet load ("RevenueL") to meet equity return
objectives of 12%
 5. Compare "RevenueL" to EES's market position
 6. Find Scaler value (option value from volatility)
 7. Calculate book earning for bid package
 --> We try to have work of 1 to 4 done by Thursday (2/24). Next meeting with
Don is scheduled on Thursday.

Regarding our starting point of NY East, EES has short position ranging from
0 MW to 126 MW in NY East region for next 11 years. I attached Excel file
which shows an analysis of NY East including load graph.

To read EES data correctly, see the below definition.
 - WD: weekdays, WE: weekends.
 - Each 4 hour block number shows average load for 4 hour block, so actual
peak load is higher than that.

Idea of sharing data with East Coast Power: Don does not mind if we
distribute EES data internally within Enron, but he does not want data to go
to Elpaso. He does not know Brad Alford.

Jinsung
(Ext: 37330)


Slow browser may need to wait 15 seconds for your email to appear, then scroll to view. mailto:leave-enerfaxdaily-794030K@relay.netatlantic.com to unsubscribe enerfaxdaily as: fermis@ect.enron.com forward to web@enerfax.com
If your email does not support this web version, please subscribe to the free text version by writing subscribe@enerfax.com <mailto:subscribe@enerfax.com> Please visit our website to view today's gas and power prices and news by clicking <http://www.enerfax.com>

If you received this in error or no longer wish to subscribe click this link mailto:leave-enerfaxdaily-794030K@relay.netatlantic.com or forward to web@enerfax.com


Guys, can you start working on your presentations for the offsite.

Dave I would like you to focus on the new generation of capital products that
you are working on for the IPP market which should be able to source short
and medium term commodity liquidity and be syndicatable(?) on the capital
side.  Go into some detail and speak to a couple of specific opportunities.
It may also be interesting for you to give an initial cut on the economics of
coal generation (including emissions control) given current power and gas
markets and a quick view of the development process. How should we
participate in this market?  Gasification technology?

Jeff, in your talk, can you focus on the emerging distributed generation
sector ie) the technologies, the users, the VC's, etc.  Specifically, how
will these technologies change our business model and the overall power
business model?  How are we positioning ourselves in this market?  What is
the PI strategy with this regard?

Dorie Hitchcock and Tammy Sheppard can do a lot of the heavy lifting;
however, we need a first cut by December 8th.

Thanks
Delainey


sent to wrong address.
PL

---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 03/12/2001
09:20 AM ---------------------------

Phillip M Love
03/12/2001 09:19 AM
To: Shane.Dobbs@fctg.com @ ENRON, kmartinec@houston.rr.com,
rachel.m.bonilla@ac.com, "Smith, Everett" <ESmith@kanekatexas.com> @ ENRON,
"Sonntag, Gregory B." <gbsonnta@utmb.edu>, "Jason Dobbs"
<jmjaked@mindspring.com> @ ENRON, Mike Jillard <mjillard@beaconelectric.com>,
"tarek morshed" <tarm27@texas.net> @ ENRON, "Scott Wachsler" <wax@ghg.net> @
ENRON, bwax@ghg.net
cc:
Subject: NCAA tournament

Payout - 1st 75%, 2nd 25%
PL

---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 03/12/2001
09:13 AM ---------------------------

Phillip M Love
03/12/2001 09:10 AM
To: Souad Mahmassani/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Victor Guggenheim/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bruce
Mills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Andres Balmaceda/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sladana-Anna
Kulic/ENRON@enronXgate, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, Timothy Blanchard/HOU/EES@EES, Jimmy
Simien/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Bosse/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C
Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT,
O'Neal D Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patrick Ryder/NA/Enron@Enron, Ryan
O'Rourke/ENRON@enronXgate, Jason Wolfe/NA/Enron@ENRON, Gregory A
Mausser/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Valdes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kyle R Lilly/HOU/ECT@ECT, B
Scott Palmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Royed/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bradley
Jones/ENRON@enronXgate, Jody Crook/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Denver
Plachy/NA/Enron@Enron, Jackson Logan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary W
Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Willie Stewart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martin Cuilla/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Luchas Johnson/NA/Enron@Enron, Anne
Bike/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: NCAA tournament

I am getting a tournament bracket together for the group. Here are the
important details - $10 per entry, bonus points per upset predicted are the
differential between the seeds(i.e. 12 beats a five you get 1 pt for the
victory and seven points for the upset), first round games worth 1 pt., and
the points for each subsequent round are the round plus 1 pt. (championship
game worth 7 pts., sixth round plus 1 pt.), tie breaker is total points
scored in final game.  Brackets are due on my desk or in my email box by 8
a.m. CST Thursday March 15th.  Here is a link to a bracket.  Please forward
to anyone you think may be interested.
PL

http://cbs.sportsline.com/u/madness/2001/brackets/men_printable.htm


I have pushed this meeting until Feb. We need to meet w/:Mcconville(2 hours
after Barth),Barth( first meeting in the morning), and Travis.Please set up
asap.
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 01/14/2000
08:24 AM ---------------------------

RTellis@milbank.com on 01/13/2000 06:42:16 PM
To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Houston Trip

Richard, Steve and I are available for a meeting in Houston on the following
dates:  2/2, 2/4, 2/7, 2/10 and 2/11.  Please let me know which date works
best for all of you.

Thanks.

This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee
or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify
the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer.

 - att1.htm


I don't think we are doing anything.  Dick had an idea but I didn't know what
he was looking at.

12/21/2000 09:53 AM
Jeffrey Porter@EES
Jeffrey Porter@EES
Jeffrey Porter@EES
12/21/2000 09:53 AM
12/21/2000 09:53 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Sale to New Power for the 21st

you gonna do anything with my storage? Remember it is still theoretical, but
make sure you leave me about 20,000/d storage flowing if retros swing down.


Here is Part 1 of Skillings presentation!
Ben
---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 03/06/2000
10:06 AM ---------------------------

Jason R Wiesepape
02/03/2000 10:34 AM
To: Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Danielson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: 2000 Analyst cont'd 2

---------------------- Forwarded by Jason R Wiesepape/HOU/ECT on 02/03/2000
10:32 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Michael B Rosen                           02/03/2000 10:18 AM

To: Jason R Wiesepape/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: 2000 Analyst cont'd 2


This is O.K as long as we get a daily estimate of usage around 8:30 C.T. and
access to actuals within two business days.


Sure thing.  Liz

From: Cathy Phillips on 02/02/2001 07:28 AM
To: Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Goals & Objectives for 2001

Hi Liz -

Thanks for copying me on this message.  Mike is in Venezuela and Jeff is on
vacation.  They should both be back in the office on Monday.  Will you please
relay this information to Greg.  Yesterday evening I called and left a
voicemail for Mike relaying this message.

Thanks.

Cathy P.
X-36898

	Greg Whalley
	Sent by: Liz M Taylor
	02/01/2001 04:33 PM

		 To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Cathy Phillips/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer
Burns/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Goals & Objectives for 2001

Mike,

Greg is requesting Enron Global Markets' 2001 Goals & Objectives (no more
than 3 to 4 each) asap.

Many Thanks,

Liz Taylor


FYI

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Proffitt, Tim
Sent:	Friday, November 09, 2001 3:40 PM
To:	Scribner, James; Stubblefield, Wade; Butler, Shelly; Zamora, Richard; Apollo, Beth; Reeves, Leslie; Aucoin, Evelyn; Baxter, Bryce; Dozier, Scott; Sweeney, Kevin; Bruce, Michelle; Leskowitz, Mark J.; Hayes, John; 'michael.james@nepco.com'; Krautz, Michael; Fisher, Joni; Davis, Frank L.; Lafave, Jill; Ratnala, Melissa K.; Dobin, Nora; Edmonds, Marcus; Herron, Chris; Subramanian, Ram; Nelson, Kimberley (EES); Quaintance Jr., Alan; Ephross, Joel
Subject:	Project Spinach

A quick update on the status of the receivables monetization initiative.

First, I have been told that we will go forward with the financing with or without any merger. That said, the banks are worried that we will change our minds and are asking for a formal engagement letter, which means we lost a few days negotiating the terms of the letter.  I don't expect any new requests for data until Tuesday at the earliest, and more likely Wednesday or Thursday of next week (as Monday is a bank holiday).

Thanks for you help, I'll let you know of any changes as they develop.  have a good weekend.

Tim


As you know, an anonymous party filed a FOIA request with FERC on March 1,
2001 seeking the certain appendices that the CAISO filed with FERC on a
confidential basis on March 1, 2001.  Those filings contain aggregate bidd
data for December and January.

Last Friday, I filed the attached letter with FERC indicating that we would
oppose releasing the materials until we are able to learn more about what is
contained in the ISO appendices.  (I have attached a copy of our letter for
those who have not received it.)

Today, I received a call today from FERC's FOIA Officer informing me that
SoCal Edison has formally requested FERC to provide it with copies of all
letters and other responses related to the FOIA request.  I guess we now know
who made the request (big surprise).

 - 0142666.01


I'm good anytime after 900 am on Monday.

Kay


As mentioned in our floor meeting recently, attached are listings of teams
that we are forming to better address the business needs of Enron as it
expands both in volume and scope. Supervisors of each RAC sub group provided
the names for the groups with the understanding that they may have to be
adjusted from time to time. Only the more senior people were included, but
others will be included as appropriate. Many will have to be
multidimensional. There will be no formal leader of the teams because each
member is responsible for the activities of the team, regardless of the RAC
group that you are in. Following are several thoughts concerning this process
for consideration.

- The purpose of this exercise is to better serve the customer, the
commercial business units and achieve this within our control framework.
- Ancillary benefits include cross training of RAC employees and heightened
awareness of RAC issues. "De-silo-ization" .
- All existing reporting relationships remain unchanged, for the moment.
- Successful implementation of this effort will require a positive attitude
among the teams.
- Existing RAC responsibilities remain in effect.
-  Teams should meet weekly, at least, to discuss issues. Transactions will
require more frequent informal meetings.
- There are no excuses for forgetting to consider the impact on a deal of
credit, market risk or our portfolio.
- All team members are responsible for all aspects of a transaction. Offer to
help out if needed.
- If formal cross-training is necessary, force it to happen.
- Encourage weak links in team to perform.
- Each quarter RAC management will conduct portfolio reviews of the business
unit with the team present. This may take one quarter to implement.
- If it makes sense to sit together for logistical reasons try to arrange it
with your supervisor.
- Individual performance on the teams will be strongly considered in the PRC
and compensation processes.

The existing EES team has been quite successful and in large part was a
catalyst to the recent reorganization there. You can have an impact.

This process should begin immediately.

Thanks in advance for your cooperation in this effort.

Rick


Vance,

Deal # 611981 has been created and entered in Sitara.

Bob

Vance L Taylor
02/05/2001 04:29 PM
To: Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia Hakemack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa
Hesse/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donald P Reinhardt/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: FIRST DELIVERY - SAFARI PRODUCTION

Bob,

The following production is now on-line and a ticket should be created and
entered into sitara based on the following:

Counterparty   Meter   Volumes  Price    Period  Global No.
Safari Production Company 4594   400mmbtu/d  85% Gas Daily   2/2 - 2/28
96057046

FYI, I will create and submit a committed reserves firm ticket for the
remaining term of the deal beginning with the month of March.  Additionally,
this is a Producer Svcs. deal and should be tracked in the IM Wellhead
portfolio... attached to the gathering contract.

Thanks,

vlt
x3-6353


After returning home and reviewing the material handed out at the PGE business review, there are two areas that I think I need to understand better.  The first is PGE's energy positions going forward and the financial exposures to changing prices.  The second is the rate case.  I would be happy to return to Portland to get a more in depth review with a much smaller cast of players.  I am open to suggestions from you.

Given the status of the divestiture process, Jeff wants to make sure he (and subsequently I) have a good handle on these two important issues.

Thanks!


Steve,

When filling out the feedback form I misread you as my supervisor and I
filled out the form referring to you.  I said pretty good things about you,
you should not, repeat SHOULD NOT believe what I said.  I was just trying to
help you out with your supervisor.

Regarding  Rick.  I can tell you that I respect him very much.  He has shown
signs of friendship beyond of what I expected.  You know that I was not very
happy with my past review but I never doubted that Rick did the best he could
given the information that he had.  I never doubted his integrity or
qualifications.

Rick is an outstanding leader and manager.  He has the ability of managing a
large and diverse group of people effectively and with no one ever feeling
any pressure, arrogance, etc.

Steve,  you have a great team which I have already started to miss.

Best,

Ricardo


Russ:      TCO   .185 /CNG .25 please call me with some feedback. I have some
room on the cng. brad


Is anyone going down to the Perd New year's weekend and eve (28-1)? If not we
would like to go.
Also, if your at the Perd. be on the lookout for a hunting knife with a horn
handle. I think I may have lost it somewhere in the front yard.
           Doug


i know its early, but i have leave early...

missing deal for matt
sell dynegy
25 mw
124.50
cal 02
sp 15
on peak


Thanks.  I have shared these with Jeff Gossett (gas risk lead) and Scott
Earnest (products risk lead).  I will be curious to hear about the plan that
your DBA's have devised today.  Thanks for you help and attention to these
problems.


Jim,
David and I wanted to let you know that Phillip has broken his arm over the
weekend and he will be out of sports for a while.  He has an appt with an
orthopedic surgeon on Friday and we should know more after that with regards
to
exactly how long he has to be in a cast.  Needless to say, Phillip is very
disappointed.  We will keep you posted.

Thanks,
David and Carolyn Warnick


Jeremy,

I don't have access to run this book.  Will you please get me authorization?
Thanks.

DG


What existing book can I use as an example, of how this book should be set?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	McLaughlin Jr., Errol
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 5:53 PM
To:	McIntyre, Burton; McClure, Zakiyyah; Velasco, Jennifer; Trevino, Susan
Cc:	Hernandez, Nancy
Subject:	BOOKREQUEST NG-X-OPTY.xls

Attached, please find the book request in response to Nancy's e-mail.  Please call w/ any questions.

Thanks,

Errol, X5-8274

 << File: BOOKREQUESTNG-X-OPTY.xls >>


Joe Hartsoe -

My understanding is that Hebert doesn't have the legal authority (and the
filing never makes clear) to Suspend performance under the PPA (he probably
doesn't have the political support for this either).

EPSA, however, could support this in its filing as a method to help move the
QF issue forward.

Jim

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	03/20/2001 10:04 AM

		 To: Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Linda
Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Ridgewood's Petition To Be Released From QF Contracts

FYI.  Any thoughts Joe & Co.? Is release from contracts an "increase supply"
option?  My fear is that QFs get released and then California's "police
state" mentality kicks in, enacting Exec Orders, legislation, etc. to ensure
that the power from the QF facilities stays in California.

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/20/2001 10:00 AM -----

	Chris H Foster@ECT
	03/20/2001 07:30 AM

		 To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Ridgewood's Petition To Be Released From QF Contracts

We are trying to set up energy purchasing arrangements with QFs who get
temporarily released from their contracts.  Take a look at the e-mail below
and see if we can suport them.

Thanks

C
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT on 03/20/2001
05:26 AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Short, Bill" <BSHORT@ridgewoodpower.com>
03/19/2001 03:59 PM

To: "Michael Davis (E-mail)" <mdavis02@coral-energy.com>, "Frank Eckhart
(E-mail)" <ffec@dynegy.com>, "Steve B. Van Leer (E-mail)"
<sbvanleer@duke-energy.com>, "Doug Fernley (E-mail)"
<doug.fernley@elpaso.com>, "Chris H. Foster (E-mail)"
<chris.h.foster@enron.com>, "Jack Pyburn (E-mail)"  <jack.pyburn@mirant.com>,
"Mark Thompson (E-mail)"  <mark.thompson@nrgenergy.com>, "Marvin (\"Trip\")
K. Ballard (E-mail)"  <marvin_k_ballard@reliantenergy.com>, "Shawn Nichols
(E-mail)"  <shawn.nichols@williams.com>, "Kyle T. Hoffman (E-mail)"
<khoffman@caiso.com>
cc: "Bahrs, John" <jbahrs@ridgewoodpower.com>, "Gulino, Dan"
<dgulino@ridgewoodpower.com>, "Holmes, Randy"  <Rholmes@ridgewoodpower.com>,
"Kawash, David"  <dkawash@ridgewoodpower.com>, "Naunton, Chris"
<Cnaunton@ridgewoodpower.com>, "Quinn, Marty"  <Mquinn@ridgewoodpower.com>
Subject: Ridgewood's Petition To Be Released From QF Contracts

 <<Comments_of_Ridgewood_letter_docket_no._EL01-47.DOC>>  <<RIDGEWOOD
_REQUEST_FOR_EXTENSION-FILING _3601.DOC>>

Gentlemen,

In light of the possible backouts in California today and later this week,
if it is possible, Ridgewood Power requests that your organization intervene
in support of the attached emergency filing at the FERC.  Please send this
e-mail to your firm's general counsel and ask him to contact either our
Washington counsel, Carol Smoots (202-496-7196), our general counsel, Dan
Gulino (800-331-8006, x-118) or me at (800-331-8006, x-163).  Any help would
be most appreciated.

Sincerely yours,

Bill Short

 - Comments_of_Ridgewood_letter_docket_no._EL01-47.DOC
 - RIDGEWOOD _REQUEST_FOR_EXTENSION-FILING _3601.DOC


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Wei, Zhiyong
Sent:	Wednesday, January 09, 2002 6:01 PM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J
Subject:	RE: Exotica, etc.

Vince,

Thanks. I will try to talk to Jim.

Zhiyong

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kaminski, Vince J
Sent:	Wednesday, January 09, 2002 5:45 PM
To:	Wei, Zhiyong
Cc:	Lu, Zimin; Aucoin, Berney C. ; Kaminski, Vince J
Subject:	Exotica, etc.

Hello,

I talked to Jim Fallon and he told me not to release any software etc. to NETCO without a formal letter from him.

Please, make sure that we get this request ASAP, so that we can guarantee an orderly transition.

Vince


Yes, please.

	From:  Kathleen Carnahan                           01/18/2001 12:02 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, ccampbel@KSLAW.com
cc:

Subject: January 8 Letter Agreement with Original Signature of Sweetgum

Kay and Carolyn,

Ozzie Pagan just handed me a letter agreement with Sweetgum's original
signature on it.  It is the January 8 letter from ENA to Sweetgum with
enclosures of the final execution forms of the three (3) Facility Agreements
(Receipt acknowledged by Sweetgum).

Kay,  do you want me to send this to Carolyn?

Kathleen


California,s power crisis has generated heated debate over the last several
months.  Unfortunately, this debate has generated more heat than light.  We
want you to know what the facts are and what we are doing about the crisis.
Please spend a few minutes reading the following overview on the situation
and our position on California energy issues.

What happened in California

The source of California,s current problem is as straightforward as supply
and demand.  California,s economy grew 29 percent since 1998.  This increased
the demand for electricity by 24 percent.  At the same time, regulatory
restrictions prevented new generation from getting built in the state.  So
demand grew but regulations prevented supplies from being added.  The result,
predictably, is a shortage.  This summer, peak capacity will be about 10
percent shy of peak demand, leading to further blackouts in the state.

In addition to the supply and demand imbalance, there are two other related
factors that led to the current crisis.  First, the state,s regulations
forced all sales and purchases into the spot market.  The spot market for
power is extraordinarily volatile.  The way firms behave in a free market
when faced with such volatility is to construct a portfolio of purchases long
term, medium term and short term, to reduce exposure to this volatility.  In
California, state regulation prevented this strategy.  This would be the
equivalent of putting the entire state on an adjustable rate mortgage in the
most volatile interest rate environment imaginable.  Everything was fine
while the power surplus persisted, but when shortages ensued, every megawatt
was purchased at the sky rocketing spot price.

Second, retail markets were not deregulated.  Regulated retail rates remained
in effect, and stranded cost recovery charges were structured to keep
competition out.  This meant that utilities were forced to pay high wholesale
prices in the spot market but were only able to recover costs at the
regulated retail rate.  They are now nearly bankrupt.

In short, California,s problems were caused by regulation, not deregulation.
Regulations prevented competitors from entering the market, prevented new
generation from being built, and prevented prudent hedging against volatile
spot prices.

At the time California was developing its restructuring plan, Enron warned
the state,s policy makers about these risks and proposed alternatives, which,
if adopted, would have averted the current crisis.

Enron,s Role

Many political leaders in the state have elected to fix blame rather than fix
the problem.  Power sellers, including Enron, have been vilified by the
politicians and the media.  Here are the facts:

? Other than a small amount of wind power, Enron is not a generator in the
state of California.  Every megawatt we sold in California we bought in the
same market available to other California purchasers.  Because we are a
market maker, not a generator, we are not biased toward high prices.  We are
interested only in having a market that works so that we can package products
for our customers.
? As a seller to end-use markets in the state, we provided protection from
the problems the states, utilities, and their customers, now face.  We
protected, and still protect, our customers from price volatility.

You may have read that EES recently elected to have the utilities supply
power directly to its customers in California instead of procuring power on
the open market.  Early reports mischaracterized this as a &turnback8 of our
customers to the utilities.  Here are the facts:

? As a result of a variety of factors existing in the current California
market, it made more sense for EES to source power for its customers directly
from the utilities.  This decision reduced EES,s market price risk by
allowing EES to access lower utility rates.
? EES did not terminate any customer contracts, and our customers continue to
receive the financial benefits of their contract prices.
? EES is continuing to work with its California customers to provide them
with other energy-related products and services, including assistance in
reducing the demand for power, particularly at peak times.

Enron is currently proposing solutions to help California work out of its
crisis; Enron continues to sign up customers in the state; and Enron
continues to actively manage its risks and capture opportunities in Western
power markets.  Enron,s primary business is managing risk for our customers
with solutions customized to meet their needs.  There has never been more
demand for our products and services.

The Solution

The solution to California,s crisis is also straightforward.  In summary, the
state must increase supply, reduce demand, reduce reliance on the spot market
and shore up the financial stability of the state,s utilities.

Increasing Supply

California,s process for siting and permitting new generation is nothing
short of Byzantine.  Enron has built plants elsewhere in the country in less
than a year.  In California, it often takes 5 to 7 years.  California simply
must streamline this process.  Ironically, while many of the regulations
generators must overcome are aimed at improving environmental quality, the
regulations are preventing new clean technology from coming online and
displacing current plants, which emit 40 times as much NOx.  California can
have abundant power and cleaner air by expediting the permitting of new
facilities.

Reducing Demand

Customers in California today have no incentive to reduce or shift demand.
They pay the same rate no matter what the market price is.  An open retail
market would trigger demand responses, which would balance supply and demand
at lower prices than today.  California should fully open its retail market.

Reducing Reliance on the Spot Market

In a truly deregulated market, customers would protect themselves from
volatile spot prices by purchasing some of their requirements on a longer
term, fixed-price basis.  The state has instead left procurement in the hands
of the utilities, which it has forced to buy exclusively in the spot market.
Opening the market at the retail level will give customers control over their
price risk.

Restoring the Financial Integrity of the State,s Institutions

The utilities in California are not paying their bills.  This has led to
greater uncertainty in the market, higher costs, and reduced flexibility to
arrive at lasting solutions.  California must permit its utilities to recover
their costs so they can pay their bills and invest in the transmission and
distribution assets necessary to get power from where it is to where it is
needed.

Just as important as doing these things, the state must avoid policies that,
while politically attractive, do not fix the problem or even make matters
worse.  Price caps have been proposed.  They don,t work; have never worked;
and they will not work here.  Price caps succeed only in creating shortages,
which then have to be allocated among competing users.  Imagine how
ineffectively the government would be in determining, for example, whether it
is better to make its limited power supplies available to the Imperial Valley
or Silicon Valley.  Price caps are a surefire way to make the current
shortage worse.

The state has also proposed to take over generation and transmission in
California.  There is no reason to believe, and every reason to doubt, that
the state will be more effective than free markets at investing in,
constructing, operating and maintaining assets.  This will also result in
California tax revenues being spent on power transmission and power
generation -- which the private sector can do -- instead of education, roads
and other public goods -- which the private sector cannot do.

As you are approached by people outside the company or are learning about the
crisis from the media, it,s important for you to know this:  We at Enron will
continue to serve our customers and we will continue to propose real
solutions to the state.


Dear Dan,

As discussed in our recent conversation, we (Enron North America "ENA")  need
to understand the issues related to the
distinction between "investor owned utilities" (or "IOUs") and municipal
utilities (or "municipals") in connection with derivatives
activity.  In the U.S., this distinction enables us to treat IOUs as general
corporates.  Thus, we negotiate our standard ISDA
Master with an IOU, except that we add an Additional Termination Event to
prevent the IOU from taking an adverse stance in
its state public utility commission proceedings.  A copy of our standard ISDA
Schedule which includes the Additional
Termination Event in Part 1 (j) is attached for your review.

Our approach with respect to U.S. municipals is dramatically different.  When
negotiating an ISDA Master with municipals, we
use a Schedule modeled after the 1992 U.S. Municipal Counterparty Schedule,
having additional reps, the added concept of
"Incipient Illegality" and an enforceability opinion.  A copy of that
Schedule and our general template form of legal opinion is
also attached for your reference.

We would like to understand whether this distinction in the utility world
also exists in Canada, and if so, in all Canadian provinces, and whether
there is a distinction when a municipal is an investor in an IOU (as we
understand that the government may assist a utility to emerge from
bankruptcy).  In that regard, would you recommend that ENA use distinct ISDA
Schedules for these types of entities and/or would you recommend specific
changes to our format?  Should we add any additional representations to our
form of Legal Opinion?

Also, we would like to point out that we use the ISDA agreements to govern a
wide variety of financial derivative transactions including derivatives based
on interest rates, equities, bonds, energy commodities (such as oil, natural
gas, electricity, etc...), paper and pulp products, currencies and weather.
Please take this into account when giving your advice.

As I mentioned on the telephone the most pressing ISDA at hand is the one we
have been asked to do with Ontario Power Generation. They are contemplating
entering into weather derivatives with us. I understand from speaking with
them that they  are an "Ontario Business Corp. Act" corporation and that the
Ontario Government has at least a partial shareholder stake in their
company.

I would propose for Sara and I to speak with you and Steve Ashborn on Monday
to at least discuss what we need to do with regard to OPG. Please advise when
would be convenient for you. (For us, any time from 3 pm Houston time onwards
should be fine).

Many thanks,

Shari Stack


- BLACKLIN.DOC
 - AFFIDAVI.DOC


A quick download on our conference call:  We agreed to split the larger group
up into 3 working groups.  The 3 of us are in the southern group.  (I, for
one, would be happy if all future meetings were held in Mexico City or San
Francisco.)  By Feb 29, we are to circulate to the larger group a report on
existing commercial problems along the US/Mexico border, e. g. continuing
difficulties with El Paso Electric and moving power across the border, and
recommendations for their solution.  Those recommendations could be much
farther reaching than just a complaint action against the utility.

It is my impression that there could be significant opportunities if we could
move more power south across the border, but that there is real intransigence
on the part of the utilities on this side.  I have no idea what the situation
is on the other side of the border.

Why don't we trade emails and voicemails over the next few weeks and try to
schedule a conference call the week of Feb 14?  That will give us about 2
weeks to get a written report together and to follow up on our brilliant
discussions.   If you have a better idea, let me know.


The plans are up in the air. The first weekend that we are all free is the
weekend of Feb 26.(if you can't make it that weekend, let me know.) If all
three of us come, there is probably 4-6 hours of work. I would propose that
we bring Ben,James and Ryan only. I will arrive Fri night and leave Sun
morning. Let me know what you think.

John Sanders MD <johnbepa@macol.net> on 01/12/2000 08:20:01 AM
To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, "Doug Sanders" <namuathome@aol.com>
cc:
Subject: Perd

Doug and Richard,

Is the Perd going to be all work and no play? I'm trying to decide if I'm
going to take Ryan with me. We could leave around 4 PM on Friday. I could
leave much sooner, if I weren't taking him with me (school and all). I
don't think he'll be
much help to what we're doing, but he'd probably have more fun than if he
he
were to stay at home.

So, when do you guys think you'll get there? How long do you think you'll
stay? Are any of your kids going?

John


I'll be out on the 2d.  I'll have Maria participate and pass anything on that
is of particular concern.  Thanks df

Dorothy McCoppin
12/11/2000 03:49 PM
To: Michael Moran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: ETS STAFF MEETING - Jan. 2

Will we have a meeting on Jan. 2 in your office (pre-ETS staff meeting)?
If so, will it be at 8:30 or can it be 9:00 am?

--Dot

---------------------- Forwarded by Dorothy McCoppin/FGT/Enron on 12/11/2000
03:49 PM ---------------------------

Stanley Horton
12/11/2000 01:03 PM
Sent by: Cindy Stark
To: Bill Cordes/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve
Hotte/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Phil
Lowry/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Danny McCarty/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Rockford
Meyer/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Michael Moran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julia
White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, James Prentice/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Scott
Vonderheide/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dave
Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Robert Hayes/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dorothy McCoppin/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Robert Kilmer/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Dan
Pribble/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Michel Nelson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON,
jerry.d.martin@enron.com, Randy Rice/OTS/Enron@ENRON, John
Shafer/OTS/Enron@Enron, James Saunders/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Jerry
Peters/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Mike McGowan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: ETS MONDAY MORNING STAFF MEETINGS

This is to advise you that we will NOT have ETS Monday morning staff meetings
on December 18 or December 25.

Please make note that the next ETS Staff Meeting will be held on Tuesday,
January 2, 2001 at 9:30AM in 49C2.   And then on January 8, we'll resume our
regular schedule of having our staff meetings on Monday mornings at 9:15AM.

Regards and Happy Holidays,
Cindy
X36197


Ditto.  Busy morning


Dan:

I have a 3:30 Meeting in my office with this guy.  Can you review this and
attend the meeting?

Thanks, Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT on 07/19/2000 09:39 AM -----

	Phil DeMoes@ENRON
	07/14/2000 04:12 PM

		 To: Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: David Fairley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ozzie
Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Elba Deal Language

Jeff,

I have been working closely with Southern Company on the sale of natural gas
from Elba and/or Destin for 10 yrs.  Please note the attached Exhibits that
Southern has drafted to our Gas Sales and Purchase Agreement dated December
29, 1999.  Additionally, I have attached two proposals that summarizes the
structure of the deal.  Pricing is still to be determined once we agree upon
the language for your review.  Please advise as to a time that we may
discuss.  I can be reached at x37912.

Thanks.

Phil D.

---------------------- Forwarded by Phil DeMoes/Corp/Enron on 07/14/2000
04:00 PM ---------------------------

"Kilpatrick, Alan M." <AMKilpat@southernco.com> on 07/12/2000 06:07:53 PM
To: "Phil DeMoes (E-mail)" <phil.demoes@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: FW: CONFIRMATION LETTER

I don't know if you got the e-mail below from Donna so I am sending it to
you again. This is a draft so please review and lets discuss.

Alan Kilpatrick --- * - 205/257-6143 --- * - 250/257-7795 ---  * -
amkilpat@southernco.com <mailto:amkilpat@southernco.com>

-----Original Message-----
From: Donna Bailey [SMTP:dbailey@balch.com]
<mailto:[SMTP:dbailey@balch.com]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 4:45 PM
Cc: amkilpat@southernco.com <mailto:amkilpat@southernco.com>
Subject: CONFIRMATION LETTER

 Phil,

Per the request of Alan Kilpatrick, I am frowarding to you a revised draft
of the confirmation letters covering the two LNG transactions SCS is
discussing with you.  In the interests of time, they have not been reviewed
by Alan or the other SCS folks and so are subject to any comments or changes
they might have.

 <<DDNQ02_.DOC>>

 - DDNQ02_.DOC


---------------------- Forwarded by Irena D Hogan/HOU/ECT on 05/09/2000 08:49
AM ---------------------------

Information Risk Management
05/09/2000 08:47 AM
Sent by: Irena D Hogan
To: Irena D Hogan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Request Submitted:  Access Request (IDHN-4K6J65)

Thank you for your request.

You will be notified via eMail when your request has been processed. You can
check the progress of your request by doing one of the following:
In the SRRS application, click on Requests I Have Made. A listing of recent
requests will be appear sorted by resource name.
Click on the Request Link below. This is a link to information regarding your
request.

Below is a summary of your request.

Requested For:  Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT
Request Date:  5/9/2000 8:47:14 AM
Request Type:  Update Access
Request Link:

Requested Resources
SITARA - Production US
SITARA - SCI/CPR

If you have any questions, please contact Information Risk Management at 35536


Dear Naomi,

As always - good talking to you yesterday.  Based on the discussions you and
I have had recently, Cassandra and I are in the process of drafting a process
whereby we receive information from you and your group to help update our
understanding of the Enron Europe remote offices.  This will allow us to
better determine which offices to scope into the doorstep review and
hopefully lessen the doorstep work required from Mike's resources.

I'll send something to you early next week.

Have a good weekend,

Shona


David,

The Supplementary Agreement looks fine.  There needs to be a few changes made
to the cover sheet with respect to the MAC provision (debt rating) and the
financial reporting for Party B (AEPSC).  AEPSC does not provide its own
financials and is not rated.  So, the MAC and financial reporting
requirements are only required for the 9 utilities.

AEPSC is only on the hook for third-party cross-default along with the 9
utilities.

I'm sorry that I missed you today...got bogged down with other emergencies.
But we can always wait for the cp's response and amend the above, unless you
want to send another version.

Regards,
Tracy

David Portz
12/07/2000 04:07 PM
To: fmdutton@aep.com@ENRON
cc: Tracy Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: EEI cover sheet completion

Mitch -- Per my voicemail to you on this subject, attached for your review is
a draft "Supplemental Agreement" and a draft Attachment A thereto.   Please
forward to Frank Hilton if this formulation looks workable to you. I look
forward to hearing from you.  Best regards, David


Please do not reply to this e-mail.

You are receiving this message because you have an unresolved invoice in your iBuyit Payables in-box
that is past due.  Please login to iBuyit Payables and resolve this invoice as soon as possible.

To launch iBuyit Payables, click on the link below:
http://iBuyitPayables.enron.com
Note:  Your iBuyit Payables User ID and Password are your eHRonline/SAP Personnel ID and Password.

First time iBuyit Payables user?  For training materials, click on the link below:
http://sap.enron.com/sap_doclib/user/file_list.asp?cabinet_id=265

Need help?
Please contact the ISC Call Center at (713) 345-4727.


Vince,

Attached is a copy of my agenda for today's trip to Berkeley.  Also, my cell
phone number is 281-793-0567.

Thanks,
Ashley
---------------------- Forwarded by Ashley Baxter/Corp/Enron on 10/16/2000
08:49 AM ---------------------------

Diane Fitzgerald <diane.fitzgerald@travelpark.com> on 10/13/2000 05:36:50 PM
To: "'ashley baxter@7136463011'"
<IMCEAFAXSR-ashley+20baxter+407136463011@travelpark.com>
cc: "'ashley.baxter@enron.com'" <ashley.baxter@enron.com>

Subject: Baxter 16Oct. Please review the following ticketed itinerary

                                          BAXTER/ASHLEY
                                          EB3614
                                          ETKT RECEIPT
  ENRON BROADBAND SERVICES

  DATE:  OCT 13 2000

SERVICE               DATE  FROM           TO             DEPART  ARRIVE

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES  16OCT HOUSTON TX     SAN F CA       1155A   158P
CO 1511    Y          MON   G.BUSH INTERCO SAN FRANCISCO
                            TERMINAL C     TERMINAL S
                            SNACK                         NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         4:03 DURATION
                  AIRCRAFT: MCDONNELL DOUGLAS ALL MD-80 SERIES
                            SEAT 09D NO SMOKING CONFIRMED BAXTER/ASHLEY(I

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES  17OCT OAKLAND CA     HOUSTON TX     630A    1229P
CO 1720    Y          TUE   INTERNATIONAL  G.BUSH INTERCO
                            TERMINAL 1     TERMINAL C
                            SNACK                         NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         3:59 DURATION
                  AIRCRAFT: BOEING 737-500
                            SEAT 07A NO SMOKING CONFIRMED BAXTER/ASHLEY(I
      AISLE SEAT UNAVAILABLE. REQ AGAIN AT CK IN. WINDOW CONFIRMED
              YOUR ETKT CONFIRMATION NUMBER IS: M X N C V T

MISCELLANEOUS         16DEC HOUSTON TX
                      SAT   ** THANK YOU FOR USING THE TAP **

RESERVATION NUMBER(S)  CO/MXNCVT

BAXTER/ASHLEY  S0C083ER1028

CO  FREQUENT FLYER COFC137772
ASHLEY BAXTER 713 853-3589
INTL TVLRS: CARRY SOS WALLET CARD W/ENRONASSISTANCE INFO
CALL SOS: IN U.S 800 523-6586/INTL 215 245-4707 (COLLECT)
*********************************************
THIS IS THE PASSENGER RECEIPT FOR YOUR ELECTRONIC TICKET.
PLEASE CHECK-IN WITH PHOTO IDENTIFICATION AND WITH
EITHER (1) THIS RECEIPT OR (2) YOUR CONFIRMATION NUMBER.
YOUR ETKT CONFIRMATION NUMBER IS: M X N C V T

Regards,
Diana Fitzgerald
(713)650-8080 ext.1152
(713)860-1152 - Direct Line
The Travel Agency in the Park


Please draft up some language that can be added to this policy to satisfy
Mike's concern.  Run it by me and we'll send it to Rod.  Thanks df
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 03/22/2001
11:41 AM ---------------------------
From: Michael P Moran/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/20/2001 02:08 PM
To: Rod Hayslett/ENRON@enronXgate
cc: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: RE: ETS Approval Authorization Policy

I think one area that needs to be clarified is that many nonVPs believe that
if they have the expenditure authority they can sign contracts in connection
with the expenditure they are approving even in the absence of a power of
attorney. I think we need the policy to clarify the difference between
expenditure authority and execution authority. Our various company bylaws
state that only VPs and above have authority to sign contracts and bind the
company unless the President of the company delegates execution authority.
Therefore we either need POAs or delegations of authority for execution
authority below VP. This policy needs to clarify this point. I have sent this
to Drew and we will work up some new additional language.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Hayslett, Rod
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 1:53 PM
To: Cordes, Bill; Corman, Shelley; Gibbs, Dana; Horton, Stanley; Hotte,
Steve; Kinningham, Laura; Lowry, Phil; McCarty, Danny; Meyer, Rockford;
Moran, Michael P.; Prentice, James; Smith, Gary; White, Julia
Cc: Ackley, Earlene; Alder, Amelia; Armstrong, Julie; Hogan, Janice; Houser,
Rita; Jolibois, Anne; Mann, Ruth; O'Neill, Virginia; Perry, Carolyn; Sellers,
Emily; Stark, Cindy; Winters, Ricki
Subject: FW: ETS Approval Authorization Policy

Please review and provide comments to myself and/or Lisa Sutton.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Sutton, Lisa
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 10:36 AM
To: Hayslett, Rod; Saunders, James; Peters, Jerry; Jesse, John; Borcyk,
David; Cherry, Paul; Brassfield, Morris; Fenstad, Larry; Brasher, Barney;
Clements, David; Concklin, Elaine; Chandler, Bob; Cobb, John; Wiederholt,
Patricia; Fancler, Dan; Lev, Jennifer; Geaccone, Tracy; Gilbert, Steve;
Keiser, John; Meers, Thomas; Barnes, Caroline; Stern, Ellis
Subject: ETS Approval Authorization Policy

FYI, based on comments received, attached is the draft which will be
distributed to Stan's direct reports for comments. We plan to have the policy
in place before the end of March.

 << File: etsapprovalpolicy.xls >>