?

Hi Folks,

Before I jump into this I  want to take one moment and say &THANK YOU8 to all
the Men and Women  who,ve served our Country as we approach Veteran,s Day
this Saturday.? If you know a Vet, thank him or  her.? I don,t want to force
my  non-football views but for those interested, I,ve included a quick piece
thanking our Veterans at the end of this report.? Thanks.

Joe

?

Matchups to Avoid  and Exploit.?

Passing Game  Matchups.?? Here's how I see the matchups this  week.? Please
note, see the  cheatsheet online http://www.cheatsheets.net/week11sheet.htm
for exactly where I rank playersand to  determine who to start.? Just because
one matchup may be more  favorable than another, that doesn't necessarily
mean I'd start the player with  the best matchup.? The matchup info  is meant
to be just one more tool in your box when it comes to deciding between
players.??

Note:? I,ve used the player stats sorted by  performance over the last four
weeks extensively in developing these write-ups.  Stats are provided by Mike
Hall,s excellent FLM League Management Software.? http://www.fflm.com/ for
more info.? The Fantasy Points Allowed by Position  numbers are from
ESPN.com.?

Here we go:

?

Locks:? These games heavily favor the Offense

Kansas City  Passing Game vs 49er Defense??  Virtually every  skill position
player is a decent start against the 49ers.? But understand that last week
QB Elvis  Grbacthrew for more  yards than Randall Cunningham, Akili Smith,
Doug Pederson and Kordell Stewart  combined.? San Francisco can,t stop
anyone and I don,t envision them learning how this week.? San Francisco
allows more Fantasy Points  to the opposing QB than any other team in the
league. The KC RBs are a mess and  coach Gunther Cunningham says they won,t
throw as much but he says that every  week.? WRs Derrick Alexander  and
Sylvester  Morrisare great  plays.?  TE  Tony Gonzalezcould be big  too.? If
you have a Chief, start him  this week.

Denver Passing  Game vs Raider Defense??  For the year, the  Raiders have
been pretty weak against the pass averaging 18.22 Fantasy Points  Allowed to
the opposing QB which ranks them #23.? But over the last four weeks, they,ve
been awful, letting opposing offenses rack up an average of 276 passing
yards  per game.? That,s the most in the  league.? Granted, two of those
games  were against the suddenly pass happy Chiefs but there were also games
against  Seattle and San Diego in that average as well.? Elvis Grbac set some
records last week  torching the secondary for 500+ yards and Brian
Grieseshould have  success as well.? He continues to  play excellent football
making good decisions.? Most importantly, he has a healthy  Terrell  Davisnow
to keep the  defense honest.?  WRs Ed McCaffrey  andRod Smith  are must
starts as  both are liable to explode at any time.?  The TEs are trickier to
predict as they have three who figure heavily in  the mix.?  Dwayne Carswell,
Byron Chamberlain  andDesmond Clark  all rank in the  top 30 TEs over the
last three weeks.?  It,s tough to count on any one of them but if you had to
pick one,  Carswell had 4 catches last week.

Jacksonville  Passing Game vs Seahawk Defense?? It wasn,t supposed to play
out  this way for Seattle but as we enter week 11 of the season, the Seahawks
find  themselves floundering.? Not only  are they having trouble scoring
points, their defense is giving up entirely too  many points.? CB Shawn
Springs is a  player but the defense has allowed an average of 268 passing?
yards per game over the last four  weeks.? That ranks them  29th in the
league.? They  rank 18th in the league when it comes to Fantasy Points
allowed to the opposing  QB for the year.? Jacksonville,s  certainly had its
struggles but this could be a game that  QB Mark  Brunelldoes some damage
with a? week to prepare.? WR Jimmy  Smithis listed as  probable on the injury
report this week.?  Reportedly, he,ll be ready by Sunday but keep an eye on
it.? Keenan  McCardellwill be  ready.? I keep trying to like rookie  R. Jay
Soward but just can,t do it.? He could do something but I don,t have  any
faith yet.?  TE  Kyle Bradyis suddenly the  Jacksonville Secret Weapon and he
could play a big part again in the  offense.

New Orleans  Passing Game vs Panther Defense?? Last year it was St. Louis.?
This year the Saints are the once awful  team that,s playing inspired
football.?  ThePanther defense has allowed an average of 261 passing yards
per game  over the last four weeks.? That  ranks them 28.? They've been
slipping as for the year, they rank # 9 in Fantasy Points allowed to the
opposing QB.?  Jeff Blakeis coming off a 3  TD, 275 yard game last week and
should continue to roll.? WR Joe  Hornis the prime  receiver as he reeled in
167 yards worth of Blake,s passes Sunday.? Keith  Pooleon the other side  was
supposed to take up the slack for injured WR Jake Reed but he,s been
disappointing.?  WR  Willie Jackson caught 4 passes  Sunday and he could
continue to see action.? TE Andrew  Gloverlooked very good  Sunday and he,s a
guy that might come on.?

San Francisco  Passing Game vs Chief Defense?? The Chiefs have no problem
throwing the ball.? Unfortunately  for Chief fans, they also have no problem
letting the other team throw the  ball.? Kansas City ranks # 27 in  Passing
Yards allowed per game over the last four weeks.? They also? rank # 20 in
Fantasy Points Allowed by  the opposing QB for the year.? All  that spells
another solid day for Jeff  Garcia.? Keep a very close eye on  Terrell
Owens,turf toe  though.? Reports are that he,ll play  Sunday but this type of
injury can be ugly and hard to recover from so we,ll  watch this one closely
for you.?  Jerry Riceis as solid as  ever on the other side.? If Owens is
limited, JJ Stokesor  Tai  Streets? would see more action.? Personally, I
like Streets of those  two.? RB Charlie  Garneris always a  threat receiving
the ball and TE Greg  Clarkshowed a hint of  being more involved last week
catching 4 passes.? I,m cheering for him but I don,t expect  Garrison
Hearstto be a factor  for the 2000 season.

Indianapolis  Passing Game vs Jets Defense??? Whether you want to lay it  on
the opponents or not, it,s hard to deny the Jets defense has slipped
lately.? For the year, they rank #  13 in Fantasy Points allowed to the
opposing QB and over the last four weeks,  they,ve allowed an average of 261
passing yards per game which puts them at #  26.? They,ve given up 11 total
TDs  over those four games which is more than you,d expect from them.? This
week, they,ll face a Colt team  that,s been challenged by QBPeyton
Manningand coach Jim  Mora to kick up the intensity.?  Again last week, the
Colts seemed to be going through the motions for the  first half and then
made a mad dash at the end.? Last week, Manning ran out of? tricks in the bag
as they were  humiliated by Chicago.? He still  finished with 300+ yards but
he could have been even better.? I like the way he,s rallying the team  and
once again, he should be looking to WR Marvin  Harrison.? After Harrison, it,
s tough to call as  Manning,s spreading the ball around.?  WRs EG Green,  and
Jerome Pathon  both saw  action.? For some reason,  Terrence Wilkins wasn,t a
factor as he only had a couple of  passes thrown his way and didn,t catch
either of them.  TEs  Marcus Pollard andKen Dilger  were their usual  solid
but tough to predict selves.?  And of course RB Edgerrin  Jamesis a solid
receiver.? Outside of Harrison and  James, it,s a gamble for who will do well
but any of these guys are probably  worth a start if you,re thin for
receivers.?

?

Prime Matchups:?  These games favor the Offense?

New York Giants Passing Game vs. Rams  Defense?? Two very good teams going in
slightly different  directions.? The Rams are dealing with adversity losing
their two best  players while the Giants are regaining some of their early
season steam.  Rejuvenated QB Kerry Collins will face a St. Louis defense
that's still yielding lots of passing yards.? In fact, they rank # 25 in
passing yards allowed per game over the last four weeks.? They rank # 23 in
Fantasy Points allowed to opposing QBs for the year.? WR Amani  Toomer's
rewarded the owners who hung with him through the rough games  as he's been
on fire lately.? Ike Hilliard is a fine # 2  WR as well.? RBs Tiki Barber and
Ron Dayne  provide a solid running threat and TE Pete Mitchell  should
contribute more than he has been.

St. Louis Passing Game vs  Giant Defense?? New York is a good team and it's a
pretty  tough matchup against the Giants.? New York ranks # 16 in Fantasy
Points  allowed to opposing QBs this year.? And they rank # 4 in passing
yards  allowed over the last four weeks.? Plus they'll be getting CB Jason
Sehorn  back this week it appears.? QB Trent Green has done an  admirable job
filling in for Kurt Warner.? I'm betting he'll continue that  success here.?
Isaac Bruce is the # 1 WR,?and he'll  bring Az-zahir Hakim and Torry Holt
into the  fold as well.? All are viable starters.? TE Roland Williams  is a
decent play but he's inconsistent.? Throw in the fact they'll  likely be
throwing a lot without Marshall Faulk and I think they'll do  well.

Tampa Bay Passing Game vs Packer Defense??  Green Bay may have salvaged their
season with Antonio Freeman's  spectacular catch Monday night but they still
have a pass defense that gives up  too many yards.? For the year, they rank #
24 in Fantasy Points allowed to  opposing QBs and over the last four weeks,
they've allowed 242 passing yards per  game which also ranks them # 24.?
Shaun King continues to  post nice numbers even if they're not real pretty.?
Over his last three  games, he's thrown 7 TDs but has only rolled up 526
yards.? Still, that  ranks him # 12 among QBs.? He's been diagnosed with
Tonsillitis?as of  Thursday after complaining of fatigue.??He's expected to
play but  watch it. Of course, his favorite WR is now Keyshawn Johnson  after
Keyshawn's private meeting at King's house a couple of weeks  ago.? They're
winning with getting the ball to Johnson so don't look for  that to change.?
Jacquez Green is a solid WR and the  better deep threat.? TE Dave Moore has
been more active  catching a TD last week.
?
New York Jets Passing Game vs Colt  Defense??? Owners of Chicago's Jim Miller
like to think  it was all Miller last week as he ripped through the Colt
secondary.?  Truthfully, the Colt's porous pass defense had plenty to do with
it.?  Vinny Testeverde should have similar success.? The Colts  rank # 18 in
passing yards allowed per game over the last four weeks. But that  includes
giving up a decent amount of yardage to less than juggernauts Chicago,
Detroit, New England and Seattle.? WRs Wayne Chrebet and  rookie sensation
Laveranues Coles should do well.?  TE Anthony Becht is finally starting to
fulfill  expectations.? He's probable on the injury report with a knee injury
but  should be able to play.
?

Buffalo Passing Game vs Bear Defense??  The Bears have played decent pass
defense of late ranking # 17 in  passing yards allowed over the last four
weeks.? Peyton Manning rolled up  302 yards against them last week and there
were several badly dropped  passes.? The Bills will reportedly start Doug
Flutie.? He's a foot shorter than Manning but brings scrambling  ability the
Bears may have a tough time with.? TE Jay Reimersma  is back to the focal
point we all thought he'd be and that should  continue.? Eric Moulds is the
prime threat at WR with  Peerless Price and Jeremy McDaniel rounding  out the
WRs.? I'd think Reimersma and Moulds will get the bulk of the work  though.

?

Even Matchups:? These games feature no real advantage  either way

Chicago Passing Game vs Bills Defense?? If I'm  Cade McNown, I'm starting to
get very worried.? New QB Jim Miller  looked very good Sunday as he went 24
for 35 with 214 yards, 1 TD and 0  interceptions.? That's a great start.?
He'll have a tough go of it  this week there could be enough hoopla
surrounding the Buffalo QBs that Chicago  can sneak in.? The Bills are ranked
# 19 in passing yards allowed per game  over the last four weeks.? Miller's
main target will again be WR  Marcus Robinson.? He's big enough to match up
well with  the Bills CBs.? After Harrison, it gets hard to predict with Eddie
 Kennison and Marty Booker catching plenty of  balls.? TE Kassem Sinceno
becomes a little more involved  each week.? I keep looking for him to make
that big catch.
?
Oakland Passing Game vs Denver Defense?? The  Raider attack is firing on all
cylinders here.? Denver ranks # 8 in passing  yards allowed over the last
four weeks.? They rank # 15 in Fantasy Points  allowed to opposing QBs for
the year.? In their week 3 matchup, QB  Rich Gannon threw 2 TDs but had his
lowest yardage total of the year  (159) and had 2 interceptions.? They've
improved since then.?  WR Tim Brown is the primary guy of course but both
Andre Rison and James Jett may make  plays.? I'm not totally into the Rison
hype as he's not getting tons of  looks.? Although he is making the very most
of what he's getting.?  TE Ricky Dudley awoke from his slumber with a
vengeance.?  He's so frustrating but he's too talented in too good a
situation not to play  unless you have another great TE.
?
Dallas Passing Game vs Bengal Defense??  The Bengals rank # 20 in passing
yards allowed over the last four  weeks.? They're # 14 in Fantasy Points
allowed to opposing QBs. What an  injury list the Cowboys have accumulated.?
QB Troy Aikman  took the needle again this week with more cortisone shots for
his  back.? Is it just me, or is he looking more and more like Nick Nolte in
North Dallas 40 each week?? The WRs are hardly recognizable with  James
McNight, Wayne McGarity and Jason Tucker  carrying the load. I'm not real
excited about any of them.?  TE Jackie Harris could be the focal point for
the passing  game.
?
New England Passing Game vs Brown Defense?? Keep  an eye on this one as much
depends on Drew Bledsoe's right  thumb.? He's still listed as questionable
but we'll know more Friday and  Saturday.? Assuming he's ok, this is still a
tough matchup.? If  Bledsoe sits and John Friesz starts, this probably slides
to a  "downside" matchup. The Browns rank? # 5 in Fantasy Points allowed to
opposing QBs.? And they rank # 9 in passing yards allowed per game over the
last four weeks.? WR Terry Glenn's struggled some of late  but this could be
a game he takes advantage of the Cleveland secondary.?  Troy Brown is seeing
some passes as well.? The Patriots  haven't thrown to the TE since Ben Coates
left town.
?
Minnesota Passing Game vs Cardinal Defense??  Suddenly, the Vikings and
Daunte Culpepper are  human.? Coach Denny Green says Culpepper's been limited
by a sore tailbone  and knee that's hindering his mobility.? This week they,
face an Arizona  defense that ranks # 13 in passing yards allowed per game
over the last four  weeks.? They also face new coach Dave McGinnis, a guy
with a reputation for  designing defenses to confuse young QBs. They rank #
10 for the year in Fantasy  Points allowed to opposing QBs.? Some of that is
no doubt a reflection on  their weak rushing defense but the cause really
isn't important.? Culpepper  will be throwing to the usual culprits of Randy
Moss and  Cris Carter.? Aeneas Williams is fine corner but he can't  cover
everyone. Both Moss and Carter are must starts, as is Culpepper.?  They've
had to find a consistent TE.
?
Detroit Passing Game vs Falcon Defense?? Lots of  uncertainties as Batch
returns from a concussion in the wake of coach Bobby Ross  quitting.? Won't
get on a soapbox but between Barry Sanders bailing out on  his team on the
eve of training camp and Bobby Ross throwing in the towel on a  team with a
winning record in November, I can't remember seeing two quitters on  display
quite so prominently in a while.? I'm sure there are behind the  scenes
situations involved but his resignation seemed awfully odd.? Must be
something in that Detroit water...? The Falcons rank # 14 in passing yards
allowed per game over the last four weeks.? For the year, they rank # 25 in
Fantasy Points allowed to opposing QBs.? Charlie Batch  will be throwing to
WRs Johnnie Morton and  Herman Moore who have both been disappointing
lately.?  TE David Sloan needs to pick up his game and he could be the  key
to allowing Batch to get into a rhythm.
?
Green Bay Passing Game vs Buccaneer Defense??  Both teams seem to have found
their way recently and want to keep the  momentum rolling.? The Bucs rank #
15 in passing yards allowed per game  over the last four weeks.? They rank #
11 in Fantasy Points allowed to  opposing QBs for the year.? QB Brett Favre
is a wily vet  and he'll be pulling out all the stops.? Monday's game was
encouraging not  just for the win but because Favre seemed to be comfortable
feeding WR  Antonio Freeman the ball more often.? That's great news for both
players.? Bill Schroeder is a factor too but Freeman is  clearly the most
talented WR.  Bubba Franks and Tyrone  Davis still share enough time at TE to
limit the other from being a  major factor.
?
Carolina Passing Game vs Saints Defense?? The  turnaround of the Saints is
one of the best stories of the season.?  Certainly, their tough defense
deserves much credit.? Against the pass, New  Orleans ranks just # 16 in
passing yards allowed over the last four games.?  They're much tougher
against the rush.? For the year, they rank # 6 in  Fantasy Points allowed to
opposing QBs.?? Steve Beuerlein  is certainly not the 1999 version we saw but
he's still a pretty good  QB.? Donald Hayes and Muhsin Muhammad will continue
to  make plays.? They have a decided height advantage over New Orleans CBs
Fred  Weary and Kevin Mathis. In the absence of TE Wesley Walls, Casey
Crawford will  likely get the start if Kris Mangum can't go.?
?
?
Downside Matchups:? These games favor the  Defense

Arizona Passing Game vs  Viking Defense?? If you're in contention in week 11
with  Plummer as your QB, congratulations, you're one heck of a manager.? I'm
no  Jake Plummer fan but if you're going to play him, this could be  the
week.? Minnesota is improving on defense, but they're still susceptible  to
the big plays.? They rank # 23 in passing yards allowed per game over  the
last four weeks David Boston is injured with a bad  hamstring and missed
practice Wednesday.? Frank Sanders is  in a huge slump, even by his standards
which is saying something.?  Martay Jenkins may be the best WR on the team
right now.?  Enough said.?

Miami Passing Game vs Charger  Defense? Quietly, the Dolphins and Jay
Fiedler  are winning football games.? Fiedler probably isn't winning them
for your fantasy team though.? He faces the Chargers this week who are back
to playing a little bit more like the Chargers of old.? San Diego ranks #  26
in Fantasy Points allowed by opposing QBs for the year but they rank # 11 in
passing yards allowed per game over the last four weeks.? Fiedler will be
throwing to Oronde Gadsden and Leslie Shepherd.?  Tony Martin is expected to
see action as well.? Fiedler may  continue to play well but the Chargers are
improving on defense.?

San Diego Passing Game vs Dolphin  Defense?? Charger coach Mike Riley has
announced  Moses Moreno will get the start at QB.? At least with  Harbaugh
you had an experienced QB behind center.? The Dolphins rank # 22  in passing
yards allowed per game over the last four weeks.? But for the  year, they
rank # 8 in Fantasy Points allowed to opposing QBs.? I think  they'll be
closer to their year long numbers this week.? Moreno will throw  to TE
Freddie Jones primarily and  even with the matchup, he's  too good to
sit.?Although it remains to be seen if Moreno will lock onto  Jones like
Harbaugh did.? In the?KC game where Moreno played  extensively,?Jones?was the
target 7 times which is less than his  normal.  WRs Curtis Conway and Jeff
Graham are  up and down players and probably not starters in most leagues.?

Seattle Passing Game vs Jaguar  Defense?? With Brock Huard's set back this
week in his  recovery from a concussion, it looks like Jon Kitna gets
another start.? The Huard situation is very worrisome to me.? He's  awfully
young to be having this type of problem.? Usually, it seems like  it's the
old guys like Aikman and Chandler that have trouble shaking the  cobwebs.? I
don't like it.? Jacksonville ranks # 22 in Fantasy Points  allowed to
opposing QBs this year.? Over the last four weeks, they rank #  21 in passing
yards allowed per game. Kitna will spread the ball between  Derrick Mayes and
Darrell Jackson likely as  Sean Dawkins is battling a deep quad bruise.?
Dawkins  might be a factor but he looks to be limited right now.? TE
Christian Fauria caught just 1 pass last week but it was for a TD so  you
have to consider him again.

?

Defensive Slam  Dunks:? These games heavily favor  the Defense

Tennessee Titan Passing Game vs. Raven  Defense?? QB Steve McNair has
trouble  throwing the ball with a healthy bunch of WRs.? He doesn't have
anything  close to a healthy bunch of WRs.? Kevin Dyson is  gone.? Yancey
Thigpen is gone without technically  leaving.? Carl Pickens is hobbled and #1
WR  Derrick Mason is less than 100%.? Looks like more receptions for  TE
Frank Wycheck.? Imagine that.? The Ravens are  suddenly inspired with their
offense finally breaking the scoreless TD-less  streak and they could be hard
to handle.

Philadelphia Passing Game vs Steeler  Defense? In case you haven't noticed,
the Steelers are an  excellent football team.? They'd be hard to handle if
only they had a QB.  They're defense is all we're concerned about here and
it's pretty darn  good.? They rank # 2 in passing yards allowed over the last
four  weeks.? They also rank # 2 in Fantasy Points allowed to opposing QBs.?
This doesn't bode well for QB Donovan McNabb.? He'll  attempt to throw to
Torrance Small and Charles  Johnson.? Small is actually starting to get more
looks but it  probably won't matter.? TE Chad Lewis hasn't been nearly  as
effective as he was early and I don't look for him to rebound in this  game.

Atlanta Passing Game vs Lion  Defense?? This one could get ugly as Chris
Chandler  looks to miss the game as he recovers from a concussion suffered
last  Sunday.? Danny Kanell gets the start.? He'll  face?a Lion defense
that's pretty solid and ranked # 7 in passing yards  allowed over the last
four weeks.? Kanell with throw to WRs Terance  Mathis and Tim Dwight.? Mathis
has played very  well of late but could struggle against a Lion Defense that
will be looking to  exhibit some of that post coach firing enthusiasm.? TE
Reggie Kelly  shows nice flashes here and there but needs to be  consistent.

Baltimore Passing Game vs Titan  Defense?? The Ravens exploded last week in
the TD department  ending their much publicized drought.? That "explosion"
came against the  Bengals who'd have a tough time stopping the University of
Maryland, much less  Baltimore.? I'm guessing the Ravens find the going just
a tad bit rougher  against a solid Tennessee defense.? The Titans rank # 5 in
passing yards  allowed over the last four weeks and # 7 in Fantasy Points
allowed by opposing  QBs for the year. QB Trent Dilfer gets the start
again.?  Qadry Ismail and Patrick Jeffers are the WRs  with Travis Taylor now
on injured reserve.? But TE  Shannon Sharpe is the primary threat, especially
in the Red zone.?  He's probably the only Raven I'd feel good about starting.

Cleveland Passing Game vs Patriot  Defense?? The Browns are tough to watch.?
QB  Doug Pederson, bless his heart, seems to try awfully hard but it takes  a
lot more than trying to succeed at this level.? Against a crafty  defensive
guy like Bill Belichick who's great at confusing the QB, it might be  ugly.
One good thing about Pederson is that he does seem to rely on WR  Kevin
Johnson almost exclusively.? He's not a bad play if you need  a WR just
because you know he'll see the ball.?Although you have?to  wonder how he'll
fare against?Patriot CB Ty Law.  Rookie WR Dennis  Northcutt has talent but
like the Bengal's Peter Warrick, is stuck in a  bad situation. TE Aaron Shea
isn't a factor.

Pittsburgh Passing Game vs Eagle  Defense?? The Eagle / Steeler game looks to
be a slugfest as  both defenses should manhandle the offenses. Philadelphia
ranks # 6 in passing  yards allowed per game over the last four weeks.?
Against QB  Kordell Stewart, that number ought to look even better next
week.?  The Eagles rank # 3 in Fantasy Points allowed to opposing QBs for the
year.  Stewart will try to throw the ball to WRs Plaxico Burress, Troy
Edwards  and Hines Ward but I wouldn't hold my breath.?  TE Mark Bruener did
score last week but I wouldn't expect that  too often.

Cincinnati Passing Game vs Dallas  Defense?? Let's put it this way.? WR
Peter  Warrick may be the best QB on this team.? The Bengals face a  Dallas
team that's got it's back against the wall with a near comical series of
injuries.? The Bengals may be just what the Cowboys need for taking out  some
frustration.? QB Akili Smith will face a defense  that's ranked # 10 in
passing yards allowed per game over the past four  weeks.? Smith will throw
the ball to WRs Peter Warrick and  Craig Yeast.? This team just doesn't have
any veterans to  show these guys who to act.? Warrick's a great talent and
probably worth a  start as you never know what he'll do but it's a tough
situation for him.?  TE Tony McGee is tough to depend on.

?

Rushing Game Matchups???  Here's how I see  the matchups this week.? Please
note, see the cheatsheet online for exactly where I rank  players and to
determine who to start.?  Just because one matchup may be more favorable than
another, that doesn't  necessarily mean I'd start the player with the best
matchup.? The matchup info is meant to be just one  more tool in your box
when it comes to deciding between players.??

?

Locks:? These games heavily favor the  Offense

Oakland's Tyrone Wheatley?and  Napoleon Kaufman vs Bronco Defense?? If?I
learned one  thing last week, it's to not?to listen to Jon Gruden concerning
Tyrone  Wheatley.??Remember last week all he talked about was how limited
Wheatley?would be and that Kaufman would carry the load.? We know how  that
went.? This week will be even worse with Monday night.? I'll get  you every
bit of info that I hear but I can already see it's going to be tough  call
with his ankles.? Making it worse is the fact Denver has given up tons  of
rushing yards.? They rank # 31 in rushing yards allowed over  the?last four
weeks but of course the Corey Dillon romp skews that a  bit.? For the year,
they rank # 21 in Fantasy Points allowed to opposing  RBs.

Minnesota's Robert Smith vs  Cardinal Defense?? New coach Dave McGinnis may
have given the  team a boost but he was the defensive coordinator for one of
the worst rush  defenses in the league before he moved to the head post.?
Arizona ranks #  30 in rushing yards allowed over the last four weeks.? With
Daunte  Culpepper still learning the game and likely to face some confusing
schemes from  McGinnis, look for Smith to be relied upon.

New England's J.R. Redmond and  Kevin Faulk vs Brown Defense?? J.R. Redmond
has been a nice  surprise after a slow start.? He's shown nice power and
quickness.?  Kevin Faulk has seemingly settled into the 3rd down role which I
think suits him  better.? Cleveland hasn't stopped anyone on the ground as
they rank # 26  for the year in Fantasy Points allowed to opposing RBs.? They
rank # 29 in  rushing yards allowed over the last four weeks.? I never feel
completely  comfortable predicting what Bill Belichick will do but I'd guess
Redmond will  see the bulk of the work here.

Jacksonville's Fred Taylor vs  Seahawk Defense?? Seattle ranks # 24 in
Fantasy Points  allowed to opposing RBs for the year.? It's even worse lately
where they  rank # 28 in rushing yards allowed over the last four weeks.? I
look for  Fred Taylor to have a nice game as the Jaguars try to salvage
their  season.? They're on the brink of missing the playoffs and I'd expect
coach  Tom Coughlin to focus on what he loves best, the run.

Cincinnati's Corey Dillon vs  Cowboy Defense?? The Baltimore game last week
showed Dillon  isn't Superman but this is a great matchup for him.? Dallas
hasn't stopped  anyone on the ground ranking # 27 in rushing yards allowed
over the last four  weeks.? They rank # 29 in Fantasy Points allowed to
opposing RBs.? I  worry about the Bengal passing game (or lack of it) but
Dillon still should be  able to run.

San Francisco's Charlie Garner vs  Chief Defense?? The Chiefs rank # 27 in
Fantasy Points  allowed to opposing RBs this season.? They're # 26 in rushing
yards allowed  per game over the last four weeks.? That has to have Charlie
Garner owners  licking their chops.? He's cooled a bit from his red hot start
but this  could be the game he gets back on pace.

?

Prime Matchups:?  These games favor the Offense?

Detroit's James Stewart vs Falcon Defense??  Atlanta comes into week 11
ranked # 30 in Fantasy Points allowed to  opposing RBs.? They rank # 25 in
rushing yards allowed over the last four  weeks.? This could be the
confidence boost the Lions need after the Bobby  Ross resignation.? Atlanta's
struggling and with Chris Chandler likely out,  the Lions have a chance to
dominate this game.
?
Atlanta's Jamal Anderson vs Lion Defense?  This could be a running game
"shootout".? The Lions aren't much  better than the Falcons defending the
rush ranking # 24 in rushing yards allowed  over the last four weeks.? Jamal
Anderson has been fairly quiet this  season.? With QB Chris Chandler likely
out, they'll need him to carry the  offensive load.
?
New Orleans' Ricky Williams vs Panther  Defense?? Carolina ranks # 16 in
rushing yards allowed per  game over the last four weeks and that number will
likely be worse once Ricky  Williams is through with them.? He's running with
the power and aggression  everyone hoped for last season.? I think the
difference is not only his  health, but a solid passing offense to take some
heat off him.?
?
Cleveland's Travis Prentice vs Patriot  Defense?? New England only ranks # 23
in rushing yards  allowed per game over the last four weeks.? For the season,
they rank # 26  in Fantasy Points allowed to opposing RBs.? Prentice and the
Cleveland  offense have struggled but this could be a decent matchup if
you've been  thinking about playing him.

Dallas' Emmitt Smith vs Bengal  Defense?? Cincinnati ranks # 20 in Fantasy
Points allowed to  opposing RBs.? They rank # 12 in rushing yards allowed
over the last four  weeks.? With their QB and WRs decimated by injuries, it
looks like it'll be  Emmitt almost by default.? I'd look for Dallas to ask
him to carry the load  this week.?

Even Matchups:? These games feature no real advantage  either way

Pittsburgh's Jerome Bettis vs  Eagle Defense?? The Eagles rank # 22 in
rushing yards allowed  over the last four weeks.? For the season, they're a
little better than  that ranking # 16 in Fantasy Points allowed to RBs.?
Bettis has been a nice  surprise this season but it looks like he'll be
without starting center  Dermontti Dawson and that's a blow.?

Seattle's Ricky Watters and  Shaun Alexander vs Jaguar Defense?? Over the
last four weeks,  Jacksonville ranks # 21 in rushing yards allowed per game.?
For the season,  they rank # 17 in Fantasy Points allowed to opposing RBs.?
That's not very  Jaguar - like and you know they're dying to get it turned
around.? The big  worry for Watters owners is that coach Mike Holmgren starts
looking to next year  and gives Alexander more time.? Be careful there.

Tampa Bay's Warrick Dunn and  Mike Alstott vs Packer Defense?? Green Bay
checks in with the  # 20 defense for rushing yards allowed per game over the
past four weeks.?  For the year, they're # 11 in Fantasy Points allowed to
opposing RBs.? It's  tough to predict how coach Tony Dungy will use his RBs.?
Dunn has been  carrying the ball more than usual lately but you'd think Tampa
would like to get  into more of a grind it out mode with Alstott.? Although
the big guy has to  prove he can hold onto the ball.?

New York Jet's Curtis Martin vs  Colts Defense?? Defenses have keyed on
stopping Martin lately  while they take their chances with QB Testeverde.?
It's been pretty  effective as Martin's not made much noise.? I'm not sure
the Colts can  contain him though.? They rank # 19 in rushing yards allowed
over the last  four weeks.? With Martin and Edgerrin James on the field,
it'll be a  matchup of two great RBs.

Buffalo's Sammy Morris and  Shawn Bryson vs Bear Defense?? Chicago ranks # 18
in rushing  yards allowed over the past four weeks.? With QB Doug Flutie
under center,  I'd look for continued running from Morris and Bryson.? Both
seem to put up  similar Fantasy numbers.? If I had to pick one, I'd probably
go with  Morris.?

Indianapolis' Edgerrin James vs  Jets Defense???The?Colts are looking to
rebound  from a sub par performance last week.? I'd think you'll see better
execution and more of a reliance on James instead of Manning having to?play
catch-up.? The Jets rank # 15 in?rushing yards allowed over the last  four
weeks.? James is a must start with his potential in all facets of the  game.

Arizona's Michael Pittman /  Thomas Jones vs Viking Defense???Keep an eye on
Pittman  as he seems to have a habit of finding some sort of injury to limit
him.?  The Viking defense is?just average?as they rank # 13 in rushing yards
allowed over the last four weeks.? New?coach Dave McGinnis reportedly  wants
to?get the ball into Pittman's hands more.? Although Jones is  the guy
they've paid the big money to so you have to wonder how long he'll  sit.

Miami's Lamar Smith vs Charger  Defense?? For the season, San Diego ranks #
13 in Fantasy  Points allowed to opposing RBs.? They've been tougher lately
but I like the  way Lamar Smith is running with confidence.? I'd start him
without  hesitation this week.

?

Downside  Matchups:? These games favor the  Defense

Green Bay's Ahman Green vs Buccaneer Defense? With  Dorsey Levens out, the
Pack turns to Green.? He seems to be anxious and  ready to contribute.? Tampa
ranks # 11 in rushing yards allowed over the  last four weeks so it'll be a
tough matchup.? For the year, Tampa ranks #  10 in Fantasy Points allowed to
opposing RBs.? He's got skills though and  could do well.?

Baltimore's Jamal Lewis vs Titans Defense??  Tennessee comes into week 11
ranked # 10 in rushing yards allowed over  the last four weeks.? For the
year, they rank # 7 in Fantasy Points allowed  to opposing RBs.? That's
solid.? They're quick and athletic and should  be a good match for the
physical Lewis.? I'd expect less than his normal  production from him.

Kansas City RBs vs 49er Defense? San Francisco has  been fairly soft against
the run ranking # 17 in rushing yards allowed the past  four weeks.? For the
year, they rank # 28 in Fantasy Points allowed by  opposing RBs.? But I've
lost all faith in Gunther Cunningham and his  running game.? They've gone
from everyone getting the ball to nobody  getting the ball while Elvis Grbac
throws all day.? I like Kimble Anders  but I'd avoid all KC RBs if you can.

San Diego's Jermaine Fazande vs Miami Defense??  Fazande seems to be the RB
of the week for San Diego as he ran for 74  yards on 22 carries last week.?
That's a lot for a Charger RB.? The  Dolphins are tough against the run
though ranking # 9 over the last four weeks  in rushing yards allowed per
game.? Even without LB Zach Thomas, it'll be a  tough matchup.

Denver's Terrell Davis vs Raider Defense??  Make sure to understand: Terrell
Davis is a sure starter, this is just  a tough matchup for him.? Over the
last four weeks, Oakland ranks # 2 in  rushing yards allowed per game.? I
expect Davis to do well, he's just got  his work cut out for him.

New York Giant's Tiki Barber and Ron Dayne vs Rams  Defense?? The Rams have
been tougher against the run lately  where they rank # 6 in rushing yards
allowed over the last four weeks.?  Their offense continues to force people
to pass the ball.? The Giant RBs  have been very effective though so you
can't count them out.? Coach Fassell  seems more willing to use Ron Dayne in
different situations than he did early  on.? And Barber is a great threat
catching the ball.

?

Defensive Slam Dunks:? These games heavily favor the  Defense

St. Louis' Justin Watson vs  Giants Defense?? The Giants rank # 1 in both
Fantasy Points  allowed for the year to opposing RBs and in rushing yards
allowed over the past  four weeks.? In other words, they're tough, and
they've been tough.?  Justin Watson will have had more time to prepare for
his start this week but I  don't think this is an Olandis Gary for Terrell
Davis type situation where the #  2 guy steps in easily and performs almost
as well as the # 1 guy.? Marshall  Faulk does too much in that offense.?
He'll also be spelled likely by Trung  Canidate but I'll believe it when I
see that candybone on the field.?  Robert Holcombe could see some time at RB
too.

Chicago's James Allen / Curtis  Enis vs Bills Defense?? The Bills play tough
rush defense  ranking # 3 over the last four weeks in rushing yards allowed
per game.?  They rank # 5 for the year in Fantasy Points allowed by opposing
RBs.? This  will be a tough matchup for any Bear that carries the ball.

Carolina's Tshimanga  Biakabutuka vs Saints Defense?? New Orleans ranks # 4
over  the last four weeks in rushing yards allowed per game.? They're
shutting  folks down and I don't think the Carolina running game is strong
enough to buck  that trend this week.

Tennessee's Eddie George vs  Raven Defense ? Eddie George is a must start
assuming he's healthy  this week.? I just don't like the matchup against a
very tough Raven  Defense that's ranked # 7 in rushing yards allowed over the
last 4 weeks.?  He'll grind out some yards but it'll be tough.

Philadelphia's Darnell Autry vs  Steeler Defense?? Autry may have had success
last week but  this week he hits a roadblock in the Steeler defense.?
Pittsburgh ranks # 2  for the year in Fantasy Points allowed for opposing
RBs.? I don't that will  change after this game.

?

?

WHAT IS A  VET

Some veterans bear visible signs of their  service: a missing limb, a jagged
scar, a certain look in the eye.? Others may carry the evidence inside  them:
a pin holding a bone together, a piece of shrapnel in the leg - or perhaps
another sort of inner steel: the soul,s ally forged in the refinery of
adversity.? Except in parades,  however, the men and women who have kept
America safe wear no badge or  emblem.? You can,t tell a vet just  by looking.

What is a vet?

He is the cop on the beat who spent six months  in Saudi Arabia sweating two
gallons a day making sure the armored personnel  carriers didn,t run out of
fuel.

He is the barroom loudmouth, dumber than five  wooden planks, whose overgrown
frat-boy behavior is outweighed a hundred times  in the cosmic scales by four
hours of exquisite bravery near the 38th  parallel.

She or he*is the nurse who fought against  futility and went to sleep sobbing
every night for two solid years in Da  Nang.

He is the POW who went away one person and  came back another*or didn,t come
back AT ALL.

He is the Quantico drill instructor who has  never seen combat*but has saved
countless lives by turning slouchy, no-account  rednecks and gang members
into Marines, and teaching them to watch each other,s  backs.

He is the parade*riding Legionnaire who pins  on his ribbons and medals with
a prosthetic hand.

He is the career quartermaster who watches the  ribbons and medals pass him
by.

He is the three anonymous heroes in The Tomb  Of The Unknowns, whose presence
at the Arlington National Cemetery must forever  preserve the memory of all
the anonymous heroes whose valor dies unrecognized  with them on the
battlefield or in the ocean,s sunless deep.

He is the old guy bagging groceries at the  supermarket*palsied now and
aggravatingly slow*who helped liberate a Nazi death  camp and who wishes all
day long that his wife were still alive to hold him when  the nightmares come.

He is an ordinary and yet an extraordinary  human being*a person who offered
some of his life,s most vital years in the  service of his country, and who
sacrificed his ambitions so others would not  have to sacrifice theirs.

He is a soldier and a savior and a sword  against the darkness, and he is
nothing more than the finest, greatest testimony  on behalf of the finest,
greatest nation ever known.

So remember, each time you see someone who has  served our country, just lean
over and say Thank You.? That,s all most people need, and in most  cases it
will mean more than any medals they could have been awarded or were  awarded.

Two little words that mean a lot, &THANK  YOU.8

Remember November 11th is Veterans  Day!

&It is the soldier, not the reporter, who has  given us freedom of the
press.? It  is the soldier, not the poet, who has given us freedom of
speech.? It is the soldier, not the campus  organizer, who has given us the
freedom to demonstrate.? It is the soldier, who salutes the flag,  who serves
beneath the flag, and whose coffin is draped by the flag, who allows  the
protester to burn the flag.8

Father Dennis Edward O,Brien,  USMC

?

 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cheatsheets-unsubscribe@egroups.com


The main user registered in EOL is Larry Desmeules, phone 281-274-7500.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Jones, Tana
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 10:09 AM
To: Guidroz, Walter
Subject: RE: Coast Energy Canada, Inc.

Do you have a contact at the Counterparty?  It is not where they are
headquartered that necessarily matters, but where they are incorporated.

	Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate 03/05/2001 10:10 AM 	   To: Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT  cc: Tom Moran/ENRON@enronXgate  Subject: RE: Coast Energy
Canada, Inc.

Tana, the information we have is that they are headquartered in SugarLand,
TX.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Jones, Tana
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 6:45 PM
To: Moran, Tom; Guidroz, Walter
Subject: Coast Energy Canada, Inc.

Are we sure that the above counterparty is US and not Canadian?


Michelle, per your request, below are the current and/or active labor union agreements specific to Enron and / or its direct affiliate entities:

Direct Hire -  Collective Bargaining Agreements (CBA)
PGE/IBEW
PGE's coyote springs project - recently re-nogitiatied to 5 year term.
PGE's generation, distribution, and transmission  workforce. - 3 year term through Mar. 2004

Eko-Electrica - JV with Mission Energy - / USWA
Eco-Electrica project - Puerto Rico -  3 year term - through June 2004

San Juan Gas
Teamsters  - O&M employees - Do not know the term of this agreement.
Progasco
UTI (local independent union) - Do not know the term of this agreement.

EIM - entities not listed -
EES/EFS - entities not listed -

Pre-Hire - Project Labor Agreements (PLA)
EWS
Roseville Energy Development, L.L.C.  - California State Building & Construction Trade Council - Negotiations underway.  Contract(s) to include Project Labor Agreement; expires on commercial operation,  Major maintance Agrement,  term to be determined (15 - 30 years); Line and Distribution construction - project specific; Access & referral neutrality agreement - Term 1 year from commercial operation date.
LODI L.L.C. - California State Building & Construuction Trades Council - Negotiations pending - peaker facility development with commitment to negotiate PLA.
Enron Power & Industrial Construction Co. (EPICc)
Coyote Springs II Project - Active agreement(s) governing the construction of the facility - Third party ownership is established. Agreements expire at commercial operation.
Longview Energy Development L.L.C. - Kelso Longview/Washington State Building & Construction Trades Council - negotiations dates pending Dec. 2001 anticipate a mirror of the Coyote Springs Agreement(s).

Please call if additional information is needed
Regards, Rj.


You're a saint(esse).


Group,

For the third day in a row (4th time this week) I have received an email or
call from Kathy at EPE asking the model to be resent because of simple
errors.  Typos in the model should be caught and corrected while checking out
with counterparties and running the CARP.  The ancillary service (spin) deals
need to sum into the ancillary section at the bottom...not with the regular
deal entry summary.  We need to use the reconciliation sheet when appropriate
(which has not been used since Feb--and this will haunt us when Houston tries
to check out March and April).  We do a good job trading for EPE and managing
their system but I am not impressed with our attention to detail for this
customer on deal entry.  I continue to see the same mistakes which suggests
that procedure questions exist.  Please ask myself or a senior member of the
group if you have any questions.  I look for us to improve going forward.

Thanks,

Bill
503-887-3449


On my way bak
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld


This would be a good process to communicate the information needed for non
budgeted projects.  What discretionary level to move budgeted dollars did
Stan give to the VP's.  Anything above that level should be submitted for
review by this process?

Rod Hayslett

11/20/2000 07:27 AM
To: Denis Tu/FGT/Enron@ENRON, David Rosenberg/FGT/Enron@ENRON, James
Centilli/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dave Waymire/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Cheryl
Perchal/NPNG/Enron@ENRON
cc: Jerry Peters/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, James Saunders/FGT/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Statement of Work Template, Etc.

What do you think about using something like this proposal for most of our
major projects (over $1.0 MM), could even go lower?   This has been proposed
by Morris specifically for EOTT projects, but there is no reason to exclude
others.

---------------------- Forwarded by Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron on 11/20/2000
07:25 AM ---------------------------

11/15/2000 10:09 AM
Morris Brassfield
Morris Brassfield
Morris Brassfield
11/15/2000 10:09 AM
11/15/2000 10:09 AM
To: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Statement of Work Template, Etc.

What do you think about using this proposed document for approving any EOTT
project that is outside the approved Project budget plan?

Here's my attempt at the template:


Another person to keep a eye on.
White male 6 ft  165 lbs. light brown hair, not a bad looking person.
He came into my building while i was inside working and gave me the story
that he was looking for work. He had to walk through a closed gated to
get inside.
i raised a shovel and informed him that he was trespassing.
this was Sunday. i just saw him again at 1pm walking north on Taft.
In my opinion this guy is up to no good. Keep your eyes open.
Bob
On Tue, 11 Dec 2001 07:31:34 -0500 Carla Webbles <carla_J@compuserve.com>
writes:
>
>Howdy -
>
>The early morning news on Channel 11 reported the arrest of someone
>the
>cops called "The Montrose Burglar".  They said he may be responsible
>for as
>many as ten armed robberies and is being charged with three, and that
>armed
>with a pistol, he would hold up people leaving bars and clubs late at
>night.  The mug shot showed a middle aged black guy, balding.  He
>doesn't
>sound like either the Fargo Carjacker or the Fairview Minivan Mugger
>but
>maybe, knock on wood, this arrest will put a liitle dent in the crime
>stats.
>
>Carla
>
>------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>emca-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
>http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today!  For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
emca-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


Hey Lisa,

Once again I am so impressed with your organizational skills when it comes to this wedding.  Just wanted to let you know that I will definitely be attending the luncheon on Friday and may even end up riding to SA with Jen (which always makes the drive that much more enjoyable).

As for the "Manicures and Pedicures for the Girls", I would like to put my order in for a Turkey Breast sandwich on white.  I can't wait till next weekend, it's going to be so much fun...can you believe it's almost here?

Love ya,
Susan

PS - I've mailed the receipt for your nightie so you should get it by Saturday...sorry it took me so long.

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.  From:  Lisa.A.Meador@chase.com                           03/28/2001 12:28 PM

To:	ashleastu@aol.com, sscott5@enron.com
cc:
Subject:	Manicure Party

Girls-

Hopefully you got your itinerary in the mail.  Please email me first, if
you did not get it and second, what your order is from Zito's.  The menu
should be in there.

Thanks!
It's really coming up!!!

Love you!
Lisa


Before the Apollo Cut-over Team can create GPG's FAR orders the business unit
needs to determine the make up of the FAR orders required for each cost
center (how many and what are they).  We can identify field assets to be
tracked by the FAR orders; however, development of the FERC IDs for the
orders will be the responsibility of the various GPG accounting groups.
Please plan to attend a meeting to develop a strategy for the completion this
task.  The meeting will take place, Tuesday, April 25, 9:00 a.m. - 11:30
a.m.  The room location will be communicated prior to the meeting. If you
know of other individuals who should attend this meeting, please feel free to
invite them.
Accurate assignment of the FERC IDs to the FAR orders is critical.  This step
will determine the accuracy of  GPG's O&M expense translation from SAP's
natural accounts to the FERC accounts.
Please call me at (713) 853-5292 if you have any questions.

We will cover the following agenda items:
Overview of FAR Order and functionality (very brief)
How are the FERC IDs used to facilitate data translation for FERC reporting
One to one relationship between FERC ID and FERC Account
Use of a variant for the FERC ID
Who in GPG will identify FERC IDs for each Cost Center's FAR Orders
Assignment of tasks, by operating group, to achieve completion on or before
May 9th (to be included in FIT 3)
ET&S
FGT/HPL
Northern Plains


Alert Posted: 11:00 AM December 1, 2000: Demand Mismatch Order Notice
Effective Sunday, December 3, 2000 at 10:00 a.m., and until further notice,
AGLC is issuing a Demand Mismatch Order for ALL Primary Pools.
Based on the current supply levels and expected demand levels, AGLC's system
cannot manage the potential excess demand and the operational integrity of
the system will be threatened. Therefore, it is essential that your
interruptible customer's demand does not exceed the scheduled supply for your
interruptible market for each primary pool under the demand mismatch order.
Each shipper/pooler/marketer is responsible for contacting their
interruptible customers to curtail demand if necessary to meet this order.
Marketers/Poolers are responsible for maintaining interruptible customer
contact information. Any customer contact information in GOS is for AGLC
internal use and is not intended to be marketers/poolers point of contact for
curtailments.


Ken called yesterday and we bought 5000/d april from him at 4.87.  He said it
could be either Milagro or El Paso SJ.  Please call him and confirm the
receipt point.

Thanks,
Mike


Hey there-
Ryan has not been feeling well all weekend and still isn't...so
unfortunately we were thinking of moving the dinner to this Thursday.  I
really hope that still works for you guys.  I don't think Ryan knows you
guys are coming, but had indicated a while ago how fun it would be to have
dinner with everyone...so I was still going to try and keep it a surprise.
Please let me know if that's still okay so I can change the reservation.

Thanks.

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 03/20/2001
03:15 PM ---------------------------
From: Patrick Mulvany/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/20/2001 03:11 PM
To: Andres Balmaceda/NA/Enron@ENRON, Anne Bike/Corp/Enron@Enron, Amy
Cavazos/NA/Enron@ENRON, Kristen Clause/ENRON@enronXgate, Sherry
Dawson/NA/Enron@Enron, Carole Frank/NA/Enron@ENRON, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Guggenheim/HOU/ECT@ECT, Liz
Hillman/Corp/Enron@Enron, George Huan/ENRON@enronXgate, Luchas
Johnson/NA/Enron@Enron, Kyle R Lilly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Souad Mahmassani/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bruce
Mills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ryan O'Rourke/ENRON@enronXgate, Scott L
PALMER/ENRON@enronxgate, Chance Rabon/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeff
Royed/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Patrick Ryder/NA/Enron@Enron, Elizabeth
Shim/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Laura Vargas/Corp/Enron@ENRON, O'Neal D
Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Richard Deming/NA/Enron@Enron, Kristine Best/ENRON@enronXgate, Larry Joe
Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: broker changes

The broker Amerex is no longer under the short name of AMERX in deal
capture.  From this point on, the short name is AMERG, which stands for
Amerex Natural Gas, Ltd.  AMERX will now default to Amerex Petroleum, which
is incorrect.  Also, the broker Spectron is no longer SPECT.  The new short
name is SPECI, which stands for Spectron Energy, Inc.

If you have any questions, please let me know.

Thanks,

Patrick Mulvany


---------------------- Forwarded by Kayne Coulter/HOU/ECT on 12/13/2000 12:23
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Christi L Nicolay                           12/13/2000 12:08 PM

To: Bill Rust/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kayne Coulter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ron
McNamara/NA/Enron@Enron, Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Rogers
Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect
cc:
Subject: SPS Grandfathered agreement on Blackwater tie.

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 12/13/2000
10:47 AM ---------------------------

"Friddle, Jarrett" <jfriddle@SPP.ORG> on 12/12/2000 05:04:37 PM
To: "SPP CPC (EXPLODER)" <cpc@spplist.spp.org>, "SPP RTWG (EXPLODER)"
<rtwg@spplist.spp.org>, SPP TRANSMISSION CUSTOMERS <SPPTrCu@SPP.ORG>
cc: "Chumley, Todd" <TChumley@SPP.ORG>

Subject: SPS Grandfathered agreement on Blackwater tie.

This is an announcement of a working policy for making service across
the Blackwater tie into WSCC in the event the SPS , bundled,
grandfathered is temporarily interrupted.  In order to preserve
competition without displacing the reservation close to the ramp, SPS
has agreed to notify SPP prior to the top of each hour whether or not
they will be making any attempt to restore the IP agreement at the top
of the next hour.  Once that designation has been declared, SPP will
open the market at the top of the hour for next-hour only service to the
BLKW DC Tie.  SPS has stated that 12/12/2000 HE 19 will be available for
service.  A similar notice will be posted to the OASIS and SPP will
follow this policy until further notice.

Jarrett Friddle
Supervisor, Tariff Administration


Initial thoughts for our meeting with Perot Systems.


Lynn,
This is the report that I provided to Dana for Marketing.
Alice

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Johnson, Alice
Sent:	Tuesday, November 06, 2001 4:57 PM
To:	Jones, Dana
Subject:	AR Report

Dana,

Let me know if this is closer to what you want.
There are three tabs in the report.
	 1) Summary by Customer
	 2) Summary by Amounts
	 3) Detail by Customer

The data is exported from SAP into an Excel spreadsheet. It takes 20 minutes to run the SAP report, export to Excel and format the Excel spreadsheet. A Business Objects report is refreshed (takes about a minute) to pick up the most current data from the Excel spreadsheet.

The reports can be accessed directly from Business Objects if you prefer. I sent you the Business Objects report also.

Alice


Would like to discuss the budgeting strategy for Gas Logistics; one company allocating out to the pipelines, collapsed cost centers, i.e. one Gas Logistics cost center per company, what triggers a plan restatement versus a variance explanation, 2002 target - at a functional level or company level or both, budgeting true O&M costs and not count on capital projects to offset costs, other related topics.


Ramesh, can the following trading locations be added to the list of selectable locations?

TEXAS WEST
US GAS EAST
US GAS WEST

Here is the existing list:

AUS POWER
CAD GAS
CAD POWER
CONTINENTAL PWR
EURO STEEL
JAPAN GLOBAL PRODUCTS
PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC
SA GAS
SA POWER
SING GLOBAL PROD
UK COAL
UK EBS
UK GAS
UK GLOBAL PROD
UK PAPER
UK POWER
UNKNOWN
US BRIDGELINE
US COAL
US EBS
US EES GAS
US EES POWER
US EMISSIONS
US ENOVATE
US FINANCIAL
US FREIGHT
US GAS CENTRAL
US GAS CLEBURNE

Please advise, thanks!

Andrew


We would like to know if this language is appropriate to put into a Deemed
ISDA.

2.            Initial Payment.   On or immediately after the Trade Date, ECT
shall prepare, execute and send a Confirmation evidencing the terms of this
Transaction to Counterparty for execution. Upon receipt of the Confirmation
by Counterparty, Counterparty shall pay to ECT $1,007,000.00.


---------------------- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 12/15/99
11:42 AM ---------------------------

Helen_Godel@clyde.co.uk on 12/15/99 06:30:56 AM
To: Gail Brownfeld/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Robert C Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
richard_b_sanders.ect%ei.enron.com@clyde.co.uk (bcc: Richard B
Sanders/HOU/ECT)
Subject: Havmann

Gail -

To answer your questions, and being brief in this complicated case, I am
optimistic about the changes of a recovery against charterers' liability
underwriters.

Were we to revive the arbitration and it went to a final hearing on merits, I
rate the chances of success as 60:40 in our favour.  Underwriters have pleaded
the defence of inherent vice in the adjourned arbitration but the burden of
proof is firmly on them.  Further, Minton Treharne & Davies, our experts,
believe that the cargo was borderline on spec. and became off-spec. for
transit-related reasons (which cannot be blamed on the ship).  In our favour,
we
have the Samarec certificate of quality and one loadport sample ex ship
showing
the cargo on spec.  Against this is the circumstantial evidence of problems on
other ships and what will be a sustained technical attack on the credibility
of
the Samarec certificate by a chemistry expert.

My instincts tell me we shall never reach a final hearing.  We will have to
revive the arbitration without doubt, but underwriters in my view have not got
the stomach for a fight.  I think they will try to settle for an agreed
figure,
and will look to Enron to discount their claim.  We shall claim against them
on
top of the settlement sum (yet to be paid by you), various costs and
disbursements incurred in defending shipowners' claims.  In my view they were
all reasonably incurred.  Underwriters were given every opportunity to settle
with shipowners but choose to do nothing.  They did not even bother to attend
the mediation.

To answer your queries on fees, the amount we are holding on client account is
approximately USD111,000 (Navigas settlement monies plus refund of arbitration
deposit less paid Clyde & Co. accounts).  Unbilled costs are approximately
o7,000 and unbilled disbursements o25,000.

Regards,
David Best.

__________________________

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
Any
views or opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the author and do
not necessarily represent those of Clyde & Co.  If you have received this
e-mail
in error, please contact Clyde & Co.

Telephone:     +44-171 623 1244
Facsimile:     +44-171 623 5427
email:         postmaster@clyde.co.uk
Internet:      http://www.clydeco.com


This e-mail is confidential and may well also be legally privileged. If you
have received it in error, you are on notice of its status.  Please notify us
immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your system.
Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its contents to
any other person:  to do so could be a breach of confidence.  Thank you for
your co-operation.  Please contact our
IT Helpdesk on +44 (0) 20 7936 4000 Ext.2000 or email ITHelp@freshfields.com
if you need assistance.

I'll drink to that.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 2:04 PM
To: Lang, Gregory F.
Cc: 'PARKER, Isabel'; Lang, Gregory F.; ccampbell@kslaw.com
Subject: RE: GE Legal Opinion

I think now we should all just log off email and turn off our phones, and
let Fed Ex, the fax machine and Citibank do the rest.

ckm

"Lang, Gregory F." <gregorylang@paulhastings.com> on 05/01/2001 12:57:04 PM

To:   "'PARKER, Isabel'" <isabel.parker@freshfields.com>,
"'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>, "Lang, Gregory F."
<gregorylang@paulhastings.com>
cc:   ccampbell@kslaw.com

Subject:  RE: GE Legal Opinion

I agree with Isabel on this point.

-----Original Message-----
From: PARKER, Isabel [mailto:isabel.parker@freshfields.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 1:40 PM
To: 'Kay.Mann@enron.com'; gregorylang@paulhastings.com
Cc: ccampbell@kslaw.com
Subject: RE: GE Legal Opinion

This e-mail is confidential and may well also be legally privileged. If you
have received it in error, you are on notice of its status.  Please notify
us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your
system.  Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its
contents to any other person:  to do so could be a breach of confidence.
Thank you for your co-operation.  Please contact our
IT Helpdesk on +44 (0) 20 7936 4000 Ext.2000 or email
ITHelp@freshfields.com
if you need assistance.

I am indifferent so long as whoever signs is authorized and we have an
incumbency certificate covering them.
Thanks
Isabel

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 12:27 PM
To: PARKER, Isabel; gregorylang@paulhastings.com
Cc: ccampbell@kslaw.com
Subject: RE: GE Legal Opinion

Isabel and Greg,

I'm having a logistical problem.  The only managing director of Salmon is
not in the office today.  I can have the membership certificates signed by
(1) a vice president or (1)  the managing member or (3) elect a new
managing director.  What's your preference?

Kay

"paulhastings.com" made the following annotations on 05/01/01 13:57:11
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

NEW E-MAIL ADDRESSES AT PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP

We have changed our e-mail address.  Our new domain name is
paulhastings.com.  In most cases, our address is composed of conventional
first name and last name plus @paulhastings.com.  Here are two examples:
janesmith@paulhastings.com and danjones@paulhastings.com.  If you have any
questions, please contact us at noc@paulhastings.com.

============================================================================
==

"The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all
computers."

============================================================================
==


Daren - fyi see below - I have already changed expected volume in sitara
120266 for Sept 25 - 30

Lee

---------------------- Forwarded by Lee L Papayoti/HOU/ECT on 09/08/2000
10:52 AM ---------------------------

"Diane Drumm" <drummd@notes.basf-corp.com> on 09/08/2000 10:14:47 AM
To: lee.l.papayoti@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: ENRON - FREEPORT NATURAL GAS NOMINATIONS

Due to a Cogen shut down  September 25 - 30th, Freeports gas requirements will
be reduced.  Please see below.

For the month of  September 2000, please schedule the following delivery of
natural gas to BASF's  Freeport, Texas plant

          QUANTITY
          (MMBTU's Day)

          1-24 25-30
          8,000     6,000

If you have any questions please give me a call.


Jim-I interviewed David Lang today for a summer clerkship and liked him a
lot.  Thanks for encouraging him to see K&S

Shall we try to reschedule our lunch, or do a golf game?  How's your
schedule looking?

All the best.

John

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete all copies of the message.


Hey Guys.

The ISO cutting our off-peak imports from PV has been an ongoing problem. Now that we are doing congestion wheels again we can finally do something to avoid these cuts using congestion wheels.

Normally the ISO will cut our Import and shift our load from NP15 (PGE1&2&3) across the path to relieve the congestion. If you submit a congestion wheel there cannot be $30 cong,  thus they will not cut your schedule going in at PV.  Instead of shifting your load the ISO will award your congestion wheel and everybody will be happy. It is important to make your wheel larger then your import to ensure that part of your import not getting cut. I would recommend to put in the max number of MW's you think you can buy in the North and get rid of in the Desert. Go big in the off-peak, we submitted 200MW wheels Saturday and I think its safe to do similar size most nights.

Geir


Just wanted to check to see if you needed any additional information to prepare the assignment letters on the Entergy New Orleans and LGS Natural Gas Contracts to Bridgeline.

Please keep me updated as to the progress on these assignments.

Thanks,
Linda S. Bryan
Ext. 3-3538


Ashley, here's an ad in Word format.  If Deron could post it at Hewitt, I
would be most grateful!


Don?t  you think that the redaction of article 13 of the Agency & Management  Agreement will be better this way::

IF  ENA BECOMES LIABLE TO CUSTOMER UNDER THIS AGREEMENT OR THE EL PASO AGENCY  AGREEMENT FOR ANY REASON, WHETHER ARISING BY NEGLIGENCE OR INTENDED CONDUCT OR  OTHERWISE, , IN NO EVENT SHALL ENA'S LIABILITY HEREUNDER EXCEED THE AGGREGATE OF  THE SERVICES FEE PAID TO ENA HEREUNDER FOR
FIVE  (5) MONTHS.
Saludos,

Armando Lanz Oliver
Lanz Consultores en Energia  S.C.
Rodolfo Gaona # 6 Despacho 103, Col. Lomas de Sotelo
Naucalpan, Edo  de Mex CP 53390
Tel: 555 757 88
Fax: 555 757 95
Cel: 044 5502  0308
Biper: 5447 1111 cve 801  9581
----------------------------------------------------------------------------


NO


NOTE:  YOU WILL RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE EACH TIME YOU ARE SELECTED AS A REVIEWER.

You have been selected to participate in the Year End 2000 Performance
Management process by providing meaningful feedback on specific employee(s).
Your feedback plays an important role in the process, and your participation
is critical to the success of Enron's Performance Management goals.

To complete requests for feedback, access PEP at http://pep.corp.enron.com
and select Perform Review under Performance Review Services.  You may begin
providing feedback immediately and are requested to have all feedback forms
completed by Friday, November 17, 2000.

If you have any questions regarding PEP or your responsibility in the
process, please contact the PEP Help Desk at:

Houston: 1.713.853.4777, Option 4
London:  44.207.783.4040, Option 4
Email: perfmgmt@enron.com

Thank you for your participation in this important process.

The following is a CUMULATIVE list of employee feedback requests with a
status of "OPEN."   Once you have submitted or declined an employee's request
for feedback, their name will no longer appear on this list.

Review Group: ENRON
Feedback Due Date: Nov 17, 2000

Employee Name                   Supervisor Name                 Date Selected
-------------                   ---------------                 -------------
ANDREWS, NAVEEN C               RUDI C ZIPTER                   Oct 31, 2000
BAXTER, ASHLEY                  DAVID DAVIES                    Nov 02, 2000
CAMPOS, HECTOR O                PEYTON S GIBNER                 Nov 06, 2000
CARSON, RICHARD L               RICHARD B BUY                   Oct 30, 2000
CRENSHAW, SHIRLEY J             WINCENTY J KAMINSKI             Oct 26, 2000
GANDY, KRISTIN H                CELESTE C ROBERTS               Nov 01, 2000
GORNY, VLADIMIR                 THEODORE R MURPHY II            Nov 02, 2000
KINDALL, KEVIN                  VASANT SHANBHOGUE               Oct 30, 2000
LAMAS VIEIRA PINTO, RODRIGO     DAVID PORT                      Oct 31, 2000
RAYMOND, MAUREEN J              WINCENTY J KAMINSKI             Nov 02, 2000
SUPATGIAT, CHONAWEE             PEYTON S GIBNER                 Oct 27, 2000
TAMARCHENKO, TANYA V            VASANT SHANBHOGUE               Oct 26, 2000
VILLARREAL, NORMA E             SHEILA H WALTON                 Oct 26, 2000
WALTON, SHEILA H                DAVID OXLEY                     Oct 27, 2000
YAMAN, SEVIL                    VASANT SHANBHOGUE               Oct 27, 2000
YUAN, DING                      RICHARD L CARSON                Oct 31, 2000


Veronica,

Relating to our previous conversation,  please see the attached remarks from
Duke regarding credit language in Sections10.3 and 11.

Also attached is my draft.

Please let me have your thoughts.

THANKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490

----- Forwarded by Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT on 02/08/2001 12:20 PM -----

	rmasciangelo@duke-energy.com
	02/05/2001 10:56 AM

		 To: Debra.Perlingiere@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Enron NA agreement - comments

Debra,

Attached are the comments I've received regarding the Enron North America
Agreement.

Please give me a call once you've had a chance to go over them.

Thanks,

Robin Masciangelo
Sr. Contract Administrator
ph. 403-297-9864

(See attached file: Enron North America Agreement.doc)

 - Enron North America Agreement.doc


DO NOT OPEN ANY E-MAIL WITH THE SUBJECT LINE, "Resume - Janet Simons"
A new and dangerous computer worm is spreading through e-mail systems.  It is
a variant of the W97M/Melissa family with a very dangerous payload.  More
dangerously, it deletes all files on all drives the user has access to upon
closing of the document.   This is a worm in that it does not infect the
local host system.  It spreads by email on opening of the document. It will
arrive by email with the following format:

---------------begin copy of email--------
Subject: Resume - Janet Simons

To: Director of Sales/Marketing,

Attached is my resume with a list of references contained within.

Please feel free to call or email me if you have any further questions
regarding my experience. I am looking forward to hearing from you.

Sincerely,

Janet Simons.
rExplorer.doc_
-----------------end copy of email--------

We appreciate your cooperation while we all work to keep Enron's computing
environment secure.  We are taking measures to try to prevent this e-mail
from entering our system, but in the event you see it, please delete the
email immediately and report it to your IT support analyst.

Please note the following Enron Policies regarding viruses:

Email

Malicious Code (Virus) Screening
In addition to the Enron requirement for email attachments (received and
sent) to be screened for malicious code (viruses, Trojan Horses, etc.), users
of Enron information resources are required to detach email attachments that
are received on to their hard drive for local virus screening purposes.

All executables (*.bat, *exe, *.com, *.vbs) files should never be launched
from email without first consulting with IT.

Virus Alerts
The Internet is constantly being flooded with information about computer
viruses and Trojan Horses. However, within among real virus notices are
computer virus hoaxes. While these hoaxes do not infect systems, they are
still time consuming and costly to handle. It only wastes bandwidth and
unnecessarily alarms other computer users.

Please, do not perpetuate unconfirmed warnings about viruses and Trojan
Horses. If you receive an invalidated warning, don't pass it to all your
friends, pass it to your IT computer security manager to validate first.

Enron
Information Risk Management
713-853-5536


I found that the said icons where never moved out to Portland.  I have moved these and added the foster security group to them.  All they should have to do is refresh there start menu..  I checked the scripts and the installation packages and they are correct so everything should work properly.

If you have any problems feel free contact me about it.

Michael S White
713-853-9001

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Atta, Asem
Sent:	Friday, May 25, 2001 9:12 AM
To:	White, Michael S.
Cc:	Scholtes, Diana; Salisbury, Holden; Cox, Chip; Steiner, David; Kraltchev, Nikolay; Crooks, William
Subject:	FW: Status?

Michael,

	Holden Salisbury, trader in our PDX office, seems to be having problems [emails included below] with getting full access to the Foster project's applications. Seems that when he browses through his program menu's on his local machine he sees only Oasis Net Exports and Transmission Ticker and when he goes through TerminalServer he's got access to all of them, he needs to be able to access all apps [ Transmission Ticker, Net Exports. Transmission Offerings, Reservation Reports, Batch Scheduler, ATC reports] from his local machine.  IT IRM  contacts up on the Portland side are Chip Cox [503-703-0536] and David Steiner [503-703-1553]. Please do let whomever know what needs to be done in order to get this resolved.

thanks in advance
Asem
x31700

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Salisbury, Holden
Sent:	Thursday, May 24, 2001 02:47 PM
To:	Atta, Asem; Cox, Chip
Cc:	Steiner, David; Kane, Paul
Subject:	RE: Status?

I need all of the Foster applications on my local profile.  I have some of them on local and some of them on my terminal server profile.  I need the same Foster profile that Diana Scholtes has on her local machine.  As of this morning I still do not have it.  Please let me know when my profile gets updated.

Thank You,
Holden

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Atta, Asem
Sent:	Wednesday, May 23, 2001 7:18 AM
To:	Cox, Chip
Cc:	Steiner, David; Kane, Paul; Salisbury, Holden
Subject:	RE: Status?

Chip,

	The issue seems to be that of an Information Risk Management problem where they haven't pushed out all the application access to Holden's profile.. I had put in a ticket with (31411) under your name for this matter on Monday. I will call them and ask them to escalate this matter.

regards
Asem
x31700

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cox, Chip
Sent:	Tuesday, May 22, 2001 05:33 PM
To:	Atta, Asem
Cc:	Steiner, David; Kane, Paul; Salisbury, Holden
Subject:	Status?

Hi Asem, just wondering if you've gotten any updates on the Foster Application issue for Holden Salisbury.

Thanks,  Chip


Start Date: 1/25/02; HourAhead hour: 9;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002012509.txt


Don't worry.  Appreciate the thought.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Steffes, Caren" <CSTEFFES@DODI.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 10:40 AM
To:	Jim Steffes
Subject:	Today's CPA

I am not having luck with anyone here at the office who has kept their
Nov./Dec. issue.  Sorry.

________________________
Caren W. Steffes
Manager, Investor Relations
Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc.
Phone:  281.492.5370


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Weekly Priority Mtg./Raetta

Date:		8/30/2001
Time:		9:30 AM - 10:30 AM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


note from linda sez he can't make it.  jeff


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/08/2000
07:16 PM ---------------------------

"Dipak Agarwalla" <a_dipak@hotmail.com> on 12/08/2000 10:56:59 AM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Paper

Hi Mr. Kaminski,

Thank you for taking your time to interview me for opportunities at Enron. I
enjoyed talking you and learning more about Enron and its dynamic business
environment. I appreciate your consideration for a challenging and rewarding
position in this industry. Please find the attached copy of my dissertation.
If you have any problem in compiling this file, please let me know.

I respected your insights and perspective on the issues addressed in my
Ph.D. dissertation; including the issues on creative model building, factors
affecting natural gas and elctricity demand and supply, and implementation
of these models to simulate the future and help traders in the decision
making of their day to day business.

I appreciated talking with you. Thank you for considering me. I am
enthusiastic about opportunities at Enron and look forward to hearing from
you.

Sincerely

Dipak Agarwalla

______________________________________________________________________________
_______
Get more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com

 - Dissertation-Dipak Agarwalla.doc


Who makes the ornaments that you like so much?

-e


Today Enron Broadband Services announced a 20-year exclusive agreement with
Blockbuster to deliver a revolutionary new "entertainment on demand" service
to consumers.   Consumers will be able to order movies from the convenience
of their homes, and watch them on their televisions whenever they want.  To
learn more about this exciting announcement and view a webcast featuring
interviews with Ken Lay and Blockbuster CEO John Antioco, visit
http://www.ebentertainmentondemand.com/.


Please see the attached work request.

Tom - If we can build a performance related characteristic to identify these
events we will follow up with another work request to look across the fleet
to identify these events.

Regards,
Hollis


When you see Gas Deals that are between two parties other than Enron, throw
them away.  Joe has said that we do not need to call them to let them know,
just toss them.

Brenna


---------------------- Forwarded by Jim Schwieger/HOU/ECT on 03/22/2001 02:31 PM ---------------------------

Jim Schwieger
04/25/2000 01:01 PM
To:	Nick Cocavessis/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject:	Costs expended on C59609 MidCon Deer Park and C59610 MidCon Flagstaff

Go ahead and contact Kevin Pilkington at the following "e mail " address kevin_pilkington@kne.com and see where he would like us to send the invoice.  Please let me know if there is a problem.

		Thanks,   Jim Schwieger
---------------------- Forwarded by Jim Schwieger/HOU/ECT on 04/25/2000 12:23 PM ---------------------------

Nick Cocavessis@ENRON
04/21/2000 08:35 AM
To:	Jim Schwieger/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:	Tom Fry/GCO/Enron@Enron, Brad Blevins/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject:	Costs expended on C59609 MidCon Deer Park and C59610 MidCon Flagstaff

Jim, where do we charge the Deer Park costs incurred prior to turning it over to Midcon?  We provided them all the engineering and ROW performed to date.
---------------------- Forwarded by Nick Cocavessis/Corp/Enron on 04/21/2000 08:31 AM ---------------------------

	  From:  Tom Fry                           04/18/2000 02:46 PM

To:	Nick Cocavessis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Brad Blevins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Kuehler/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject:	Costs expended on C59609 MidCon Deer Park and C59610 MidCon Flagstaff

We have spent $ 35,729 at Deer Park and $ 9,627 at Flagstaff. I will advise you about the ROW costs when I receive them from Towles.
                                                                                Tom Fry


tych  -  we are not below bbb

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tycholiz, Barry
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 9:18 AM
To:	Bradford, William S.
Cc:	Miller, Stephanie; Grigsby, Mike; Lavorato, John
Subject:	PGT Pipeline L/C Request

Bill, FYI, I have received a formal request from PGT asking Enron to provide security on their pipeline.  The request is for approx $ 11MM. They are referencing a provision in their tariff  that says that if a co. goes below BBB by S&P, then they have the right to ask for security.

I have discussed this request with them and they assure me we are not being singled out. I told them we will review the letter with credit and management and get back to them prior to the deadline imposed on their request( Nov. 20).

A copy of this request will be on your desk first thing this a.m.

regards, BT


The conference room is located by the kitchen on the 31st floor.  If you have
any questions, please call "Z" at ext. 5-4858.

Thanks!


Thanks. We will run with it.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Derrick Jr., James
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 5:30 PM
To:	Sanders, Richard B.
Subject:	FW: Crescendo

I understand from Janet Place that this is not a Northern Border project but rather a North America project and that she is leaving you a voice mail regarding this.  I assume that either you or Andy Edison will follow up.  Thank you. JIm

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Fossum, Drew
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 3:44 PM
To:	Sanders, Richard B.
Cc:	'James Derrick (Business Fax)'; Edison, Andrew; Gray, Barbara N.; Place, Janet
Subject:	Crescendo

The Crescendo project is a Northern Border project, and the appropriate contact for Christopher Sullivan (the fellow that left Jim the voice mail) is probably Janet Place.  I've left Janet a voice mail with the contact information on Sullivan and asked her to get ahold of him regarding his letter on the helium issue.  In case you access email ahead of voice mail Janet, the guy is Chistopher Sullivan, Rocky Mountain Helium, 1-800-945-1547.  Thanks all.  DF


Reagan, Bill, Larry, and I got together to put together a draft business plan that can be applied to the Southeast and Midwest regions.  The schedule is probably aggressive, depending on when we get a power marketing license.  The plan is short on back end details until the eventual buyer is known, and until we know VAR, capital, etc.

Mitch


Hey I want to check with you about pulling $750 from our checking account to deposit into my gambling account.  No I have not lost $1,000 but I am following a model and I take all the games it says and there are more than 20 games each week which eats up all the capital until the games are decided.  I know the next question and so far I have lost $150 but I didn't take any games this week because there wasn't enough to bet all of them and I would have won $150.  Anyway, I would like to know if there are any big checks coming otherwise I am going to pulse and get things set up for this weekend.  On a side note, the furniture people called and said the furniture is coming in in pieces and they should have it all by November which means it would ship to us between the 1st and 3 week of November but definitely before Thanksgiving.


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 05/21/2001
05:26 PM ---------------------------

Linda Robertson
05/21/2001 03:03 PM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Revised Electricity Emergency Authorities Memo

Here's a first draft of the emergency powers memo Sarah put together with
V&E.  We are still awaiting one more section on the Federal Reserve's
authority.  As you will note, there is remarkable authority vested in the
President, including eminent domain.  Please note page 7, which read in
combination with footnote #4 gives wide authority to the Federal government.
Let's decide soon how we want to use this memo.  Thanks.
 - 140855_1.DOC


Greetings, MIT Recruiting Team!

Each of you has been chosen to represent Enron for our Fall 2000 recruiting
efforts at MIT University.  As part of the team, you will be challenged with
choosing the best candidates from Sloan's Graduate School to join our
Associate Program.

Our first campus event will be on September 21 and interviews will be held on
campus November 7 and 8.  I hope you are all able to participate in the
exciting process of recruiting young talent.

We will be more formally organising ourselves in the next couple of weeks.
Currently, we are planning to have a brief team meeting in order to make
introductions, inform you about the Associate Program, and discuss the fall
recruiting calendar.  To that end, please contact me with any questions or
comments you may have.

The team meeting date is set for September 1st at 10am in room 11C2.

Please RSVP to me as soon as possible.

I look forward to meeting you all soon.

Sincerely,

Kristin Gandy
Associate Recruiter
x 53214


Attached, please find the "West Desk Organizational Chart".  Please note,
this is chart is for "internal use" ONLY!

gngr
713-853-7751
----- Forwarded by Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron on 06/01/2001 04:03 PM -----

	Alan Comnes/ENRON@enronXgate
	06/01/2001 03:35 PM

		 To: Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE:

Ginger,

Can you circulate the attached chart to Government Affairs staff.  The
subject line should read "West Desk Organizational Chart."  Please put in the
cover note that the chart is for internal Enron use only.

Thanks,

Alan Comnes

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Nicolay, Christi
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 6:13 AM
To: Comnes, Alan
Subject: RE:

Alan -- Can you send an email to Ginger Dernehl (for distribution to gov't
affairs) that lists the heads of the various desks in West Power?  I've had
some questions from people wanting a list.  Thanks!
---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 05/24/2001
08:08 AM ---------------------------
From: Debra Davidson/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/23/2001 06:30 PM
To: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: RE:

No, we have nothing like this for West Power Trading.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Nicolay, Christi
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 11:12 AM
To: Davidson, Debra
Subject:

Do you have a similar chart for West Power?  We found this very helpful for
Gov't Affairs people to assist trading better.  Thanks.

 << File: EastPwrOrg_0501.ppt >>


Daren, tell Tonya I called Edie last night about my W-2.  She said that they
got a new CPA & he has been told to mail them but hasn't.  She gave me the
amount that will show on the form.  It was $1500. I wrote it down at home
how much the net was, but I didn't bring it with me.  I had drawn some off
paying for Lacy's Tiger Doll stuff.  She said that she would tell him again
to get them mailed. Love, Ma
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com


TJ -
How many spots does the Ercot RT group have for the LV trip in October?

JMF


Due to the timing differences I had a crack at including these changes.

Attached is an amended confirmation. The only change I was not sure about was
tightening up the temperature definition. Do you mean moving to greater
precision in rounding? No problem but we are following the UK approach.

I would be most interested in any comments Paul would have. By way of
background I consulted the London office on their rounding conventions for
Celsuis.

Raymond Yeow
04/14/2000 07:58 AM
To: David Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Sara Shackleton@ECT, Paul Quilkey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Stephen J Lowe/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Heidi
Mason/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Nick Mooney/LON/ECT@ECT, Jerven
Zhang/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Global Confirm for Weather

Dear David,

Thanks to you for your prompt attention and to Jerven for finding Christian's
corrected document.

Nick has commenced the process to put a global confirm which can be used
woeldwide by Enron for weather derivatives,
He has contacted Paul Simons , ex Clifford Chance , ISDA board member, and
SFC compliance officer to kick off.

In the meantime, we will use the document below { CDD 13-04-00.doc }
but changes will still be further required - sorry :o(

A.
Payment Date(s)

want to say that final payment from any adjustment is no later than 20 biz
days after end of 95 days.
Avoids continual payments if temp is revised frequently in the 95 days.

B.
in Floating amount for
time, and tighter defn of temperature
and base temp is 18

C.
Data Sources
I want to make the Final payment dependent not on website ( because website
is not updated when a correction occurs)
but rather the final
Data Source is  "daily temp and climate archive" of the National
climate centre ( NCC) of BoM

Do you want me to type up changes for you to peruse or shall i chase up
directly with Sara ?
Who OKs the wording of the confirm. ?

Thx, Raymond
13 April

To: Raymond Yeow/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: FYI---Re: Australian CDD Confirmation

---------------------- Forwarded by Nick Mooney/LON/ECT on 14/04/2000 03:33
---------------------------

	Enron Europe

	From:  Nick Mooney                           13/04/2000 14:55

To: Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: FYI---Re: Australian CDD Confirmation

Paul,
as per my voicemail - here is a draft confirm for weather - on the deems ISDA
basis preparred by the guys downunder. Would like you professional input to
help them with an interimsolution on this contract.

Further down the line (and this should also be encompassed in the web stuff)
we need to have alegal group that works toward producing a master contract
confirm that can be used for all Weather deriv structures and used in a
global marketplace.  Just a quick job for a supremo like you!!!

I'll talk to you on Monday when I get back into London about the politics!!!

have a great weekend
Nick
---------------------- Forwarded by Nick Mooney/LON/ECT on 13/04/2000 20:48
---------------------------

Raymond Yeow@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
13/04/2000 13:38
To: Mark Tawney@ECT, Nick Mooney/LON/ECT@ECT, Steven Vu@ECT, Christian
Werner/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: FYI---Re: CDD Confirmation

David Minns
04/13/2000 12:17 PM
To: Raymond Yeow/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Sara Shackleton@ECT, Paul Quilkey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Stephen J Lowe/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: CDD Confirmation

Raymond attached is the CDD confirmation form. I have gone through the
comments on the draft Jerven gave me. The only change I made is the inclusion
of a weather station number in addition to a name. There was a question mark
next to the website reference and a comment that there is no quality control
for public access. Is the website reference OK?

Sara this confirmation follows the ENA model. The changes  only relate to the
differing measurement references. We also included a  paragraph 5 to further
reduce the possibility of the trade being characterised as insurance. If ENA
is the counterparty then it should be enough to reference the relevant ISDA
Master Agreement and change the references to EAF to ENA.


No thanks necessary.  My pleasure.  I'll report back with what happens this
afternoon.

Best,
Jeff

P.S.  You run a damned good meeting.


REMINDER!!!

You are enrolled in the following.

Derivatives II
November 1 & 2, 2001
in EB552
8:00 am - 5:00 pm  (both days)

Please complete the following quizzes and bring to class

Please be on time


yes
i dont know.  both have their merits

"Jennifer White" <jenwhite7@zdnetonebox.com> on 03/26/2001 01:41:38 PM
To: john.arnold@enron.com
cc:
Subject: easter weekend

Jen and Paula are definitely going to NYC for the long weekend.  Think
about what you want to do, and I'll call you tonight to discuss:

Do you want to spend the long weekend with me or do your own thing?
If you want to spend it with me, would you rather go to the beach or
to NYC?

___________________________________________________________________
To get your own FREE ZDNet Onebox - FREE voicemail, email, and fax,
all in one place - sign up today at http://www.zdnetonebox.com


Roman

Thanks.

My home number is 281 367 5377

Vince

Roman Kosecki <rkosecki@mieco.com> on 10/13/2000 09:38:39 AM
To: "'Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE:

I will be in Houston on Wed. Willl give you a call
Roman

-----Original Message-----
From: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com [mailto:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2000 2:43 PM
To: rkosecki@mieco.com
Subject: Re:

Roman,

Drinks after work would be better. I am flying back from Ca on Tue morning.
Please, call me at 713 853 3848 or 713 410 5396 (cell)
in the afternoon.

Vince

Roman Kosecki <rkosecki@mieco.com> on 10/12/2000 12:21:50 PM

To:   "'Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:

Hi Vince
   I will be in Houston for a few days next week ( like mon-wed). If you
are
back from your European trips maybe we can "do" lunch ?
   Roman


Start Date: 4/5/01; HourAhead hour: 23;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001040523.txt


Not being aware of all the ins and outs of your transaction, but based upon the description below and the provisions of the master netting agreement, I think the receivables must be removed from step 1 (see Sections 7/11 or the netting agreement); therefore, an amendment is evidently required.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ephross, Joel
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 2:39 PM
To: Cook, Mary; Proffitt, Tim; Hodge, Jeffrey T.
Cc: Mellencamp, Lisa; Herron, Chris
Subject: RE: Master Netting Agreements and Prior Physical Gas Receivable
Financing

	Mary, in step 1 all of the receivables meeting the definition of Receivable are transferred from ENA to Swee'P; in step 2 Swee'P sells an undivided interest in the pool of Receivables to ASCC [CIBC's conduit vehicle]. The September report indicated that PG&E accounted for 3,340,000/167,000,000 th's of ASCC's interest in the pool of receivables [ASCC having an interest of 167,000,000 divided by some larger amount [which amount includes the excess concentration amount, a reserve requirement, etc.]] Swee'P obtained from ENA.  Note that if the PG&E receivable is "removed" from step 2, then all that really happens is that no credit is given to Swee'P in the numerator, resulting in a smaller undivided interest in the pool being transferred to ASCC; however, by virtue of the PG&E receivable being transferred from ENA to Swee'P in step 1, the PG&E receivable will always be in the denominator, and ASCC will always buy an undivided interest in the pool which includes the PG&E receivable, it will just buy a smaller percentage interest if it is excluded from the numerator. I need to know what you mean by "extracting" the receivable -- if you mean that no credit is obtained by Swee'P in the calculation of the undivided interest that ASCC purchases, then that can be accomplished on the next reinvestment date. If you mean that no undivided interest in the receivable can be transferred to ASCC, then I think it needs to come out of step 1 [so that it is removed from the denominator, not just the numerator], and I think that the only way to do that is by amending the documents.

-----Original Message-----
From: Cook, Mary
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 12:03 PM
To: Proffitt, Tim; Ephross, Joel; Hodge, Jeffrey T.
Subject: RE: Master Netting Agreements and Prior Physical Gas Receivable
Financing

Per Lisa Mellencamp and based upon visiting with Mark Taylor, extracting the PGE receivables on 10/25, the next regular date, is satisfactory.  Please note that the master netting does not include the PGE utility entity, only the non-utilities.  Joel, you have a copy of the netting agreement showing all parties thereto.  You should check with Hodge re any utility gas contract receivables.

-----Original Message-----
From: Proffitt, Tim
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 11:42 AM
To: Bradford, William S.; Ephross, Joel; Cook, Mary; Taylor, Mark E
(Legal); Hodge, Jeffrey T.; St. Clair, Carol; Sager, Elizabeth; Murphy,
Harlan
Cc: Rohauer, Tanya; Herron, Chris; Reeves, Leslie
Subject: RE: Master Netting Agreements and Prior Physical Gas Receivable
Financing

Good question, our report rolls everything up to the parent. Leslie, can you gather the actual counterparties? thanks.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Koepke, Gwyn
Sent:	Tuesday, June 26, 2001 1:00 AM
To:	Hudler, Cindy; Stuart III, William; Shahi, Pushkar; Raymond, Maureen; Kaminski, Vince J
Subject:	Jamaica forecast for JMD and inflation, dated 6/25/01

Cindy,

Please find attached the forecast for Jamaica's currency and CPI.

Gwyn Koepke and
Maureen Raymond-Castaneda


FYI.  Attached is a presentation on gas markets that I gave to an electricity
group yesterday.  The group was formed out of California's restructuring
legislation (AB 1980).  It's called the "AB 1980 Implementation Group" (I
heard that the group decided that its time to change its name.).  The group
includes just about all of the interest groups in California.

I focused on the fact that gas offers a model of a "real" market that
California should look to in order to fix the "artificial" and failed
electricity model created by AB 1980.

Best,
Jeff

---- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 11/15/2000 10:14 AM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	11/13/2000 01:49 PM

		 To: April Hrach/SF/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject:


Wow.  Call  my travel agent.  Book me on a heavy guilt trip....

	Prentice Sellers <psellers@Haas.Berkeley.EDU>
	04/11/2001 03:56 PM

		 To: scottwl@hotmail.com, Cameron Sellers <cameron@perfect.com>
		 cc: jdasovic@enron.com
		 Subject: Lone Mountain Gig

Cameron and Scott - are you still up for playing at Haas on Friday?  Jeff
won't do it.  BUt the guy who arranged it sent out an email to everyone
saying we were playing and will be really bummed if we don't.  If you guys
are still up for it, I can try to find a guitar player to play with
us.  Obviously I would ask Steve and see if he could or if he had any other
suggestions.  Let me know how y'all feel about it.


Please see attached memo and INGAA papers.


we have diff # for jp.  as of 12/17 we have a bal of 11.346 in jp.


Debra,
Please prepare and deliver to Patrice for further handling.

Thanks
-Darren


Attached is the latest version. As each day passes, we receive more data
which helps to shape the document attached. The most recent additions have
been italicized in red and blue for ease of reference. Should you have any
comments pls. forward to Janie or I. Thanks