Yours?
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark A Taylor/EFS/EES on 09/05/2000 10:52
AM ---------------------------

Michael Guerriero@ENRON
09/05/2000 10:39 AM

To: Andrea Calo/SA/Enron@Enron
cc: mark.taylor@enron.com, Patrick Hansen/SA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: CNV-Precedents

He missed the Agrisitio.com.ar case.

All others are related to Futures and Options conflicts with the Commodities
board. We are not in conflict with the commodities board and are not
brokering futures contracts. I will work on getting such clarification from
the CNV via Patrick. We still need the other information we spoke of on
Friday.

Andrea Calo
09/05/2000 11:17 AM
To: mark.taylor@enron.com, Michael Guerriero/SA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: CNV-Precedents

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Andrea Calo/SA/Enron on 09/05/2000 11:19
AM ---------------------------

IRIBARNE Sebasti?n M. <SMI@marval.com.ar> on 09/04/2000 07:12:00 PM
To: "'Andrea.Calo@enron.com'" <Andrea.Calo@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Doc2__1

Andrea,

Te adjunto una breve descripci?n de los antecedentes de la CNV con relacion a
a derivados e internet.? Me han adelantado un closing para aana tengo que
arranca a las tres de la tarde, asi que estaria libre maana durante la
maana o el miercoles.

Muy cordialmente,

Sebastian M. Iribarne

 <<Doc2__1_.doc>>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Este mensaje es confidencial. Puede contener informacion amparada
por el secreto profesional. Si usted ha recibido este e-mail por error,
por favor comuniquenoslo inmediatamente via e-mail y tenga la
amabilidad de eliminarlo de su sistema; no debera copiar el mensaje
ni divulgar su contenido a ninguna persona. Muchas gracias.

This message is confidential. It may also contain information that is
privileged or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you have
received it by mistake please let us know by e-mail immediately and
delete it from your system; you should also not copy the message nor
disclose its contents to anyone. Many thanks.
?---------------------------------------------------------------------

 - Doc2__1_.doc


Please note that the below-listed WAPA offices, which have previously been
known under several names in our global counterparty database, will now be
known as the names in red.

WAPA-Colorado River Storage Project Manangement Center (CRSP)  (This office
is in Salt Lake City and was formerly known as Salt Lake City Area or Upper
Colorado)

WAPA-Desert Southwest Region (This office is in Phoenix and was formerly know
as Phoenix Area, or Lower Colorado)

WAPA-Rocky Mountain Region  (This office is in Loveland, Colorado and was
formerly known as Loveland Area, Loveland-Fort Collins Area, and Lower
Missouri)

WAPA-Upper Great Plains Region (This office is in Billings, MT, and was
formerly known as Billings Area, Upper Missouri, and Pick-Sloan Missouri)


Daily Blessing

Lunch with God
http://www.daily-blessings.com/bless112.htm

Christmas Soldier
http://www.daily-blessings.com/ch24.htm

Hundred's of you have taken advantage of the free download available for the
Work From Home folks.  If you haven't checked it out yet...you should!!

http://www.daily-blessings.com/cjworkfromhome.htm

Win one of four great trips each of them valued at over $13,000!  Enter today!
Click Here:  http://www.onresponse.com/onR_Ads.asp?a=8534&d=1329

Receive a FREE GIFT PACKAGE worth $29.95
PLUS an amazing FREE BONUS GIFT worth $39.95!

Get the confidence you need to make your PC work for you! At Home With Your
PC is a unique, step-by-step instructional series that combines CD-ROMs and
easy-to-use project cards. Learn from the most enjoyable tutor there is.

Learn how to:
- Design your own letterhead
- Keep track of your money
- E-mail messages and pictures
- Find your way around the Internet
- and much more!

Click Here:  http://www.onresponse.com/onR_Ads.asp?a=8534&d=579

<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>
* To remove yourself from this mailing list, point your browser to:
http://inbound.postmastergeneral.com/remove?dailyblessings:10
* Enter your email address (judy.hernandez@enron.com) in the field
provided and click "Unsubscribe". The mailing list ID is "dailyblessings:10".

OR...

* Reply to this message with the word "remove" in the subject line.

This message was sent to address judy.hernandez@enron.com
X-PMG-Recipient: judy.hernandez@enron.com
<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>


Becky,

Can we get a copy of this filing? I have a meeting with Mitchell next Wednesday and I would like to know more about the filing and will find out more about the pipeline. These are the very things we should be protesting as we move forward with our new business in Texas.

If you will advise me what additional information you will need for the protest, our desk will work to assist you in gathering the data.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Martin, Thomas A.
Sent:	Tuesday, October 30, 2001 7:17 AM
To:	Farmer, Daren J.; Redmond, Brian; Bryan, Gary
Subject:	FW: Inquiry?

I am not familiar with this system but it seems philosophically we should protest even though we don't currently do any business on this pipeline.
What do you guys think?

Tom

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cantrell, Rebecca W.
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 6:17 PM
To:	Martin, Thomas A.
Subject:	Inquiry?

Tom, does your group have any dealings with Acacia Natural Gas?  It's a Texas intrastate owned by Mitchell.  They have made a filing for approval of Section 311 rates for interruptible service and they have set up their Operating Conditions so their affiliate will get higher priority over other parties who are paying the same rate (priority within the same rate will be based on whoever has the earliest transportation agreement).

Would appreciate hearing from you in the next day or so.  Comments are due on the filing by Nov. 7th, and if we want to protest, we'll have to get our facts together.

Thanks.

Becky.


Any news?

Eric


Daren - I need a deal set up for meter 1459 for June '00. It flowed 34/day
6/1-6/6.  The last deal number used was  77352 for ENA.  Please let me know
when this is set up.

Thanks,
Aimee


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Blair, Kit
Sent:	Thursday, August 09, 2001 6:49 PM
To:	Stokley, Chris
Subject:


We are in the process of determining the Committee meeting schedule for December 10, 2001.  Please let us know approximately how much time you may require for your agenda in order to ensure the appropriate allotment of time.

Thanks.

Lori Pinder
Supervisor, Corporate Services
and Assistant Secretary
1400 Smith St., Room 4922
Houston, Texas 77002
713.853.6099


FYI
Received: from mcafee.bracepatt.com by mail.bracepatt.com; Wed, 20 Jun 2001
15:26:46 -0500
Received: FROM [208.207.43.2] BY mcafee.bracepatt.com ; Wed Jun 20 15:35:30
2001 -0500
X-Proxy: keymaster.bracepatt.com protected
Received: from no.name.available by [208.207.43.2]          via smtpd (for
mail.bracepatt.com [205.138.132.1]) with SMTP; 20 Jun 2001 20:19:14 UT
Received: from internet.ferc.fed.us ([204.87.29.21]) by mailrelay1.ferc.gov
with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.2966);  Wed, 20 Jun 2001 16:19:05 -0400
Received: from WDCODOMAIN-Message_Server by internet.ferc.fed.us with
Novell_GroupWise; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 16:16:36 -0400
Message-Id: <sb30cc64.033@internet.ferc.fed.us>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 5.5.3.1
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 16:16:25 -0400
From: "Curtis Wagner" <curtis.wagner@ferc.fed.us>
To: <dshaffer@akllp.com>,<kminesinger@akllp.com>, <rrich@bracepatt.com>,
<moloughl@brattle.com>, <jhmcgrew@brudergentile.com>,
<jmmarcoux@brudergentile.com>, <hym@cpuc.ca.gov>, <jab@cpuc.ca.gov>,
<daniel.collins@elpaso.com>, <greg.jones@elpaso.com>,
<judy.heineman@elpaso.com>, <mark.cook@elpaso.com>,
<jlgreene@energyadvocates.com>, "Edith Gilmore" <edith.gilmore@ferc.fed.us>,
"Marcia Hooks" <marcia.hooks@ferc.fed.us>, "Martha Altamar"
<martha.altamar@ferc.fed.us>, "Ruby Meek" <ruby.meek@ferc.fed.us>,
<jmoriarty@fw-law.com>, <kbedwards@gkrse-law.com>, <jfagan@hewm.com>,
<PMohler@HEWM.com>, <DLBeresford@HHLAW.com>, <GSterling@HHLAW.com>,
<bjost@huberlaw.com>, <dhuard@manatt.com>, <jgregg@mbolaw.com>,
<lochsenhirt@mbolaw.com>, <dmcwash@mshpc.com>, <frl3@pge.com>,
<sandrar@prestongates.com>, <GBaker@Sempra.com>, <wlansinger@Sempra.com>,
<DROBINSO@skadden.com>, <GRICHMAN@skadden.com>, <JSherman@skadden.com>,
<wscherma@skadden.com>, <ryspeed-bost@verner.com>
Subject: Report to Commission and Procedural Order in RP00-241-000
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_D288D5B4.FE9FDF7E"
Return-Path: curtis.wagner@ferc.fed.us
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Jun 2001 20:19:05.0850 (UTC)
FILETIME=[412A35A0:01C0F9C6]

Attached is my report to the Commission on procedural dates and an outline
of documents ordered to be produced by the Chief Judge.?
?
IMPORTANT:? The filing requirement in the Report is  to the Chief Judge and
does not have to be made with the Secretary.? Of  course, as we agreed at the
hearing, service will made on the  parties.
 - RP00-241 Proc. order.wpd


EOL report for TV in conference on 33

Cash

-Hehub
-Chicago
-PEPL
-Katy
          -Waha

Prompt Month Nymex


To whom it may concern: I need the Microsoft outlook web access icon downloaded to my computer

	thanks michael.yowman@enron.com


Shirley,

Please, set up a phone interview. Stinson, Krishna, Paulo, Grant.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 06/26/2000
03:02 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Bill Berkeland @ ENRON                           06/26/2000 12:20 PM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kim Melodick/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Resume - Rabi De

Vince, thanks for returning my call. Here's Rabi's resume for your review. As
I mentioned, I worked with Rabi for a little over a year at Shell and was
very impressed with both his abilities and work ethic. If you would like any
further info from me, please do not hesitate to give me a call.

Thanks.

Bill

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

(For Human Resources)

---------------------- Forwarded by Bill Berkeland/Corp/Enron on 06/26/2000
11:08 AM ---------------------------

Rabi De <rabide@yahoo.com> on 06/25/2000 08:24:07 PM
To: Bill.Berkeland@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Resume

Dear Bill:

Thank you very much for volunteering to circulate my resume within Enron. As
you know, I am interested in exploring career opportunities in Financial
Engineering within Enron. I am particularly interested in joining the
research group headed by Dr. Vince Kaminski.

Enron continues to innovate its way through the energy and telecom
marketplace using its substantial intellectual capital. The enclosed resume
details my experience, academic background, and contributions in the area of
risk modeling and management. Understanding risk is a core competency of
Enron and I am excited about the possibility of working, learning, and
growing with the very best in the industry.

Please forward my resume within Enron as you see fit. Thank you in advance
for any referrals or recommendations you may be able to provide.

Best regards,

Rabi S. De

Do You Yahoo!?
Get Yahoo! Mail- Free email you can access from anywhere!


The ENW Staff Mtg. has been CANCELED for this week(11/16) and next week(11/23
).  The meeting will resume on Thursday, November 30th.

Happy Thanksgiving!

Tammie


The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: Robert L. Bradley Jr
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: Robert L. Bradley
Report Total: $1,837.06
Amount Due Employee: $1,837.06

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://expensexms.enron.com


Attached is a spreadsheet that lists all the new generation projects that need artcicle X permitting for New York.  The newest generation coming online is Coneds 360 MW East River Repowering slated for Q4 2002.  However, after speaking to Coned this morning this plan seems a little ambitous and won't probably come online until 2003.  Construction on this project has not yet begun and will be GE Frame7s.  The only substantial MWs under construction is PG&E's Athens plant which is 1080 MWs in Zone F slated for Q3 2003.  Everything else posted is still in planning stages.  However, these numbers do not show any generation under 80 MW that don't require an article X permitting process.  The estimated amount of potential new supply for NYC is 380MW and 204MW for Long Island that could come online that don't require permitting.

Overall supply recap,  no new sizeable generation slated probably until end of 2003 or early 2004.  Last summer on Aug9 the NYISO peaked at 31,050 MW and Coned peaked at 12,134 MW.  The NYISO predicts that given an extreme weather case the max demand  can goto 32,290 MW.  I will keep everybody updated on any new supply changes.  You can access this website  http://www.dps.state.ny.us/articlex.htm  whichs shows the new generation projects in NY.

Rob


Dear Colleagues,

We know you have many questions about your new benefits plan, payroll issues and other changes that will occur over the next few weeks. Human Resources and Communications are preparing a thorough Q&A, which we will send to you tomorrow and will regularly update as more information is available.

Meanwhile, please read the announcement below from Security about how you can obtain a new UBS Warburg access card that will allow you to enter our new office space after Friday.

I am confident that you share my enthusiasm about our new opportunity.  We look forward to working along side each of you in the coming days.

David Oxley
Head, Human Resources
____________________________________________________________________

Access Cards

There will be a two-day transition for the new UBS Warburg access cards. Beginning Monday, February 11, access to the 5th and 6th floors of Enron Center South will require these new cards. UBS Warburg access cards can be picked up from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. at the reception area on the 5th floor of Enron Center South on Thursday, February 7th ; Friday, February 8th ; and Monday, February 11. Enron Security will produce new access cards with existing photographs, then simultaneously issue the new and collect the old cards. Employees without UBS Warburg cards will be allowed into the Enron Center South building on Monday but will have to collect their new cards as soon as possible to gain access to the 5th and 6th floors.

Employees who fail to collect their new cards by 7 p.m. Monday will be required to contact Enron Security's general information number at 713-853-5360 to arrange to pick them up.

There will be security staff available at the pick up point on ECS 5 to help with any problems you might have.

It is suggested employees wear their access cards at all times while on the premise.

Accessible Areas - The new cards will allow UBS-W employees to enter:
5th & 6th floors and Plaza area of Enron Center South ,
The Sky Ring
Body Shop, Enron Center North Plaza and therefore access the Credit Union and Cafeteria from either building.

Restricted Areas - Employees must submit to Enron Security a Restricted Access Request form (available by calling 713 8535360 ) and signed by Bob McAuliffe (713-853-7468) to enter:
Enron Center South, 8th and 9th floors
Enron Center North, 22nd and 34th floor
Ardmore Data Center.

Employees staying with the Enron estate while visa and other issues are completed - Employees in this group who are on assignment arrangements to UBS-W will be issued a regular access card - available in the same way as other new UBS-W employees.

Estate employees who are working with UBS-W on transition issues  - If they will be based in UBS-W office space they should talk to their UBS-W counterpart for approval and then UBSW HR for the issue of a UBS-W contractor card (in addition to their regular Enron badge).


Peter:

As we have discussed, I think we probably need someone other than Dan.  I
don't think there is any need to lay everything out on use of lawyers in
Canada.  I agree with your comments on the business model for lawyers.  We
can't ignore that.  Let's generally talk that through with Jim.

Regards,

Mark

	Peter Keohane
	03/07/2001 08:46 AM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Canadian Counsel

Mark, a few thoughts:

1.  Dan Fournier asked me to go to lunch so he could update me on his "very
positive meeting" with Jim and you.  I told Dan, politely, that I am very
tired of talking to the issue and really have nothing more to add.  I hope
that is OK with you.  To be honest, I am really tired of talking to the issue
and dealing with Dan Fournier's political maneuvering, but I am also
concerned that it seems apparent that the result of his meeting with you and
Jim is that he thinks he is back in the saddle with Enron.  I have lost trust
and confidence in Dan Fournier and as I mentioned Dan's approach within
Blakes becomes exclusive and results in inefficient allocation of Blakes
resources to our files.  He tries to conquer the client and thereby alienates
the talent within his firm.  I know for a fact, after he has squeezed others
out on our work and his mismanagement of this issue with Enron, that if Dan
is back in the saddle, many of his partners will not been keen on doing our
work under Dan's terms.  I also know that there is a philosophy in Houston to
commercial people not having say in legal retainers, but I believe that the
senior commercial people who are responsible for the transactions,
particularly in a smaller office in a smaller market, have an important place
in the relationship, and in that regard, I know Fournier has lost the trust
and confidence of Rob Milnthorp.

2.  Regarding Donahue Ernst and Young, it should be borne in mind that the
initial contact to doing work at their firm was through Jordan Mintz and
Morris Clark on the tax side.  I also know Jordan thinks well not just of
their firm but of the multidisciplinary business model.  I also think that
Jim needs to understand that the business model is likely not going away, and
likely to expand in Canada, the US and Europe and is something we likely
cannot ignore.  Also, the circumstances you will recall for us using DEY
initially was on regulatory and contracting issues affecting the retail
market, where the incumbent firms with any experience in the area were all
conflicted and in an area where Blakes is particularly weak in Calgary.  (We
first approached Stikemans, which had conflict with Enmax, and Bennett Jones,
which had a conflict with ATCO.  Other firms which we do not typically use
but which had experience also had conflicts.  After that, I solicited written
propsals from both Blakes and DEY and interviewed with them with the retail
team.)  Frankly, DEY has done good work for us.  E&Y is also very well
situated on the market development side in Ontario, a leading proponent of
deregulation of the Ontario market, and worked with us to set up our systems
in Toronto for market opening.

3.  Should I e-mail to Jim a proposed agenda for our call on the 20th
outlining the firms we currently use in different capacities in Canada?
Blakes, Bennett Jones, Stikemans, Oslers, Donahue E&Y, or is a less structurd
call anticipated?

Peter.

Peter.


Deadline for offer letters
- We plan an email this afternoon extending the deadline thru 9am tomorrow for those who haven't signed yet.
- Portland and Calgary may set different deadlines.

Deadline for Employment Agreements
- given all the changes we are planning to make to the base form, we are planning extending this to "24 hours from when they are presented with next draft".

David


This is fine go ahead and send it.  Thanks!!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mahabir, Alisha
Sent:	Thursday, October 11, 2001 4:46 PM
To:	Perlingiere, Debra
Subject:	Amendment

Jennifer,

per your discussion with myself and Debra Perlingiere, here are the sentences that we would like to add to the amendment you sent us.

"All capitalized terms used herein unless otherwise defined shall have the meanings given to them in the Base Agreement."

"This First Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which taken together shall consitute one and the same instrument."

Thanks so much for your patience and understanding on this matter,

Alisha


We have received fully executed copies of the following Confidentiality
Agreements:

Energy Argus, Inc. dated April 5, 2000

AccuWeather, Inc. dated April 4, 2000

Copies have been faxed to the counterparties.  I will also send copies to
Dave Samuels for your files.


Start Date: 10/22/01; HourAhead hour: 24;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.


First hurdle has been passed ( my supervisor said yes, if contracts will
allow it, lets share data).  Next step is to have contracts reviewed by our
legal to see if OK with vendors.  I am now walking the PI/Dwights contract to
our counsel for an opinion on this issue.  The other (Tobin) data was
purchased by our John Handley who is out today.  Upon his return, I'll get
with him to explore our options.


>From: "Amy Coats" <kelsey02@hotmail.com>
>To: ken.lay@enron.com
>Subject: overtime
>Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2000 23:19:06 GMT
>
>Hello Mr. Lay,
>
>I saw something on the news last nite that indicated that you may be
>particpating in the building of the new Basketball stadium, or something of
>that nature, and I got to thinking.  It's really great how Enron helps out
>in all of the funding of these great projects, but the disturbing thing
>about it all, is that my Mother, who is an employee at your company, is not
>allowed to be paid overtime for her very busy department.  She's even
>worked overtime for no pay, and is now threatened to be written up if she
>doesn't leave between 5:00 and 5:30.  I think it's a very dedicated
>employee that will work for no pay, just make sure that the other
>employee's at your company receive their correct compensations.
>My Mom has no idea I'm sending this, and would probably strongly discourage
>it, but it's just something I felt I should do....
>On the other hand, she loves what she does....I even tried to get
>employment at your company because she raved about what a great place to
>work it is.  I think it's something that deserves looking into....
>
>Sincerely,
>
>Amy Coats
>kelsey02@hotmail.com
>
>

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.


In addition to the Concentration Limit NA Gas P/L notification issued below, I believe there should also be a P/L Notification on NA Gas Commodity Group Limit, but the DPR reporting does not reflect it currently.  Lavorato has a "Cross-Commodity" line on the Business Unit DPR that reflected $18,670 MM VaR and ($23,583 MM) P/L.  This does not roll up into the NA Gas Commodity Group line which had $55,509 VaR and ($67,838 MM) P/L, both below the $85 MM Commodity Group limit, but it was appropriately included in the Business Unit VaR and P/L.

I obtained the detail of this cross-commodity line by reviewing the Concentration Limit DPR:

	VaR	P/L
Gas	  18,580 	  (24,659)	 (a)
Power	       233 	        376
Residual Fuel		        545
F/X		        155
Total		  (23,583)

Business Unit DPR:
NA Gas	  55,509 	  (67,838)
Gas in Cross-Commodity		  (24,659)	 (a)
Total		  (92,497)

According to the Policy, all commodities traded within a business unit should have a limit approved by the CRO.  I can see how we might want to allow some leeway in the application of that requirement, but not to the extent of $18.6 MM VaR.  So my recommendation is:

1) Require the Gas and Power position in Lavorato's cross-commodity books to be rolled up into Gas and Power Commodity Group results on the Business Unit DPR, and compared to the Commodity Group VaR limits established for Gas and Power.  This would not have caused a VaR violation today as we recently increased the commodity group limit for Gas to $85 MM, only a P/L notification.  And while Power is not material now, it has been in the past, and could easily be again, and Power is a standard Americas commodity group.

2) Grant an "Other" VaR limit of $X (a small amount) that authorizes Lavorato to trade other commodities. That at least limits this other activity and will require him to discuss with the you if he wants to take an exceptionally large position in a commodity other than Gas and Power.

I think protecting the integrity of the Commodity Group limits is also important from the perspective that the Business Unit management is not really responsible for the Concentration Limit DPR (Lavorato and Kitchen do not even have access to view it!), and they are not on the distribution list for notifications on those limits. So as far as Lavorato/Kitchen is concerned, as currently reported they had no P/L notifications today as Power made some income so the business unit only lost ($97MM) vs it's $100 MM VaR limit. But the company lost ($119 MM) on gas, as noted in the e-mail below, and proper reporting of all of Lavorato's gas and power positions in comparison to his corresponding Commodity Group limits would have resulted in a Commodity Group P/L notification of ($92 MM) vs. the $85 MM limit.

We already eliminated all the position limits for Gas and Power.  Although the Concentration Limit DPR is accurately reflecting activity, we should probably make sure the VaR and P/L is being clearly reported on the Business Unit DPR as well, as that is the one that much of management of the company is still focused on.

Do you agree?   We can discuss when you're back in the office.

Regards,
Cassandra.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Thibodeaux, Kenneth
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 2:53 PM
To:	Buy, Rick; Frevert, Mark; Lay, Kenneth; Port, David; Whalley, Greg; Schultz, Cassandra; Murphy, Ted; Hayden, Frank
Cc:	Wilson, Shona; Abel, Chris; Allison, John; Wallace, Cassi
Subject:	RE: ERV Notification: Violation/Notification Memo 10/16/01

The notification is now published to the Executive Reports Viewer website - erv.corp.enron.com,  and is available for viewing.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Thibodeaux, Kenneth
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 10:24 AM
To:	Buy, Rick; Frevert, Mark; Lay, Kenneth; Port, David; Whalley, Greg; Schultz, Cassandra; Murphy, Ted; Hayden, Frank
Cc:	Wilson, Shona; Abel, Chris; Allison, John; Wallace, Cassi
Subject:	RE: ERV Notification: Violation/Notification Memo 10/16/01

We are having technical difficulties with the ERV website at this time.  We will send another notification to you as soon as the problem has been resolved and the notification is listed on the website.

Notification: Concentration Americas Natural Gas Total P&L

Limit: $100 million
DPR report P&L: $119 million

Explanation:  The loss was a result of increased prices on short positions.  Specifically:
-Positions:
Short positions in U.S. Gas (341 BCF), Canada Power Gas (214 BCF), and Cross Commodity Gas (214 BCF)
- Prices:
NYMEX prices increased $.21 on news of Solomon Smith Barney's revised Winter 01-02 forecast
Cash prices increased $.15-$.30 across all regions of the country


FYI on nov. 17 2000 we did 5,400,00 MWH's. However it does bear watching.
---------------------- Forwarded by Andy Zipper/Corp/Enron on 11/20/2000
09:59 AM ---------------------------

"Anna Couch" <acouch@intcx.com> on 11/17/2000 01:21:01 PM
To: andy.zipper@enron.com
cc:

Subject: ICE Sets One-day Trading Record of Over 2 Million MWhs

MEDIA ADVISORY

November 17, 2000

IntercontinentalExchange Sets One-day Trading Record of Over 2 Million MWhs
* "The ICE" trading volumes growing rapidly since launch

Atlanta, GA (November 17, 2000) IntercontinentalExchange, a leading
marketplace for over-the-counter (OTC) energy and metals products, announced
today that it traded more than 2 million megawatt-hours yesterday (Thursday),
only one month after going live with its energy complex.

ICE trading volumes have been growing rapidly since the launch of energy
trading on October 12 and precious metals on August 24.  As of November 16,
"The ICE" has traded 15 million gold and gold equivalent ounces; 150 million
barrels of crude and refined oil derivatives, 800 million mmBTUs (million
British Thermal Units) of natural gas and natural gas derivatives, and 22
million megawatt-hours of firm power (as of close of trading November 16).

The total notional value for all OTC products traded to date on "The ICE" is
over $13 billion.  ICE participation continues to expand at a rapid rate and
currently includes 85 of the world's largest energy and financial commodity
firms.

About IntercontinentalExchange

IntercontinentalExchange is an internet-based electronic marketplace founded
in March of this year by leading U.S. and European financial institutions and
energy and natural resource firms.   Based in Atlanta (and with offices in
New York, Houston, and London), this electronic exchange is taking the
technological revolution that occurred in international financial markets and
extending it into global commodity markets. As a result, you can now trade
commodities products around the clock and around the world every single day
of the business week.

IntercontinentalExchange's partners include, American Electric Power, Aquila
Energy (a unit of UtiliCorp United), BP, Deutsche Bank AG, Duke Energy, El
Paso Energy, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley Dean Witter, Reliant Energy, Royal
Dutch/Shell Group, SG Investment Banking, Southern Energy Inc., Totalfina
Elf, and Continental Power Exchange -- which provided the trading technology
and management team.  For more information about IntercontinentalExchange,
please visit the website at www.intercontinentalexchange.com.

###

Contact:

Dorien van Boven/JoAnn Healy, Trimedia Inc.
Tel. (212) 888-6115 Ext. 231/226
Dorien@Trimediapr.com /JoAnn@Trimediapr.com


Market Participants:

> PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) is planning to commence the 2000 Operational
> Study in July 2000.  As in past years, PwC is seeking input from market
> participants prior to recommending the specific procedures to be covered
> in this Operational Study.  The Audit Committee will make the final
> decision on the scope of the Study based on recommendations from PwC,
> which will reflect input from this stakeholder feedback process.
>
> Please call or e-mail Charlotte Martin at (916) 351-2118 /
> cmartin@caiso.com to request a meeting (in person or via conference call)
> with PwC to discuss the scope of this study.
>
> As described at the May Audit Committee meeting, market participants will
> be given the opportunity to have a member of Operations management, Trent
> Carlson, present during all or a portion of the meetings.  At its recent
> meeting, the Audit Committee reaffirmed its position that information
> conveyed during these meetings is to be treated in the strictest
> confidence when the market participants so desire.
>
> When making arrangements for the meeting please advise Charlotte which of
> the three choices you desire:
>  1)  Meet with PwC only
>  2)  Meet with PwC and Trent Carlson
>  3)  Meet first with PwC only; followed by a session including Trent
> Carlson to cover certain matters addressed in the first meeting that the
> market participant wish to communicate directly to CAISO management.
>
Don Fuller
Director, Client Relations

Sent on behalf of Don Fuller by Alice Leonard

Alice Leonard
Client Relations
(916) 351-4467
aleonard@caiso.com


I'm working hard for you!  Now at 83.5.  I need a new lawnmower, so I'll try
to bump it up a little more.

Hope you're doing good.

D

"buylow" <buylow@houston.rr.com> on 08/07/2000 09:31:07 AM
To: "Daren J Farmer" <daren.j.farmer@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Enron

??? KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK.
?
WE AT HOME LOVE IT AT $80+++
?
KEN


(See attached file: hpl0801.xls)

 - hpl0801.xls


I don't care as long as I see them

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tholan, Scott
Sent:	Wednesday, February 07, 2001 3:15 PM
To:	Lavorato, John J.
Subject:	Duke Candidates

Neil has approached me on the Duke trader candidates we had identified  Do you want to get the resumes when we get them from our consultant, or should they go to Neil Davies?  Copies to both you and Neil?
---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Tholan/Corp/Enron on 02/07/2001 03:12 PM ---------------------------

Scott Tholan
02/07/2001 03:11 PM
To:	Neil Davies/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject:	Duke Candidates

Neil,
	We are still moving ahead with our consultant to get the resumes of the Duke traders.  The bonus season at Duke occurs towards the end of this month, and all the candidates have explicitly told us that they are waiting to share their resumes only until after their bonuses are distributed.  We'll keep on top of it and advise.

<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>


Grant is gonna be pissed!

DG

"Kent & Karen Pope" <kwpope@pdq.net> on 04/03/2001 12:53:24 PM
To: "KRISTI GIRON" <KRISTI.GIRON@cfisd.net>, "Darron C. Giron"
<Darron.C.Giron@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: girl?

Hey!? Dr. Jackson thinks he saw the girl  lines that he needed to see on the
ultrasound.? He really went out on a  limb and said 65% chance girl.? He's
just like a weather man.? ok,  that's all.? Sue said dinner was great and
that Christopher loved it. Sorry  we missed it.? I know the food and company
were awesome!
kep
?


Spoke with David Harvin, a senior litigator at V&E.  He believes it would be
prudent to call it an "apparent theft" in the two places where" theft"
appears in the release.  Accordingly, this change should be made and the
"analysts" script should be revised accordingly.  Please advise if there are
any questions. Thanks.  SWD

Scott Vonderheide@ENRON
02/23/2000 01:11 PM
To: Hardie Davis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Beth
Meyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gina Taylor/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Dave
Schafer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michael Burke/Houston/Eott@Eott, Lori
Maddox/Houston/Eott@Eott, Susan Ralph/Houston/Eott@Eott, Steve
Duffy/Houston/Eott@Eott, Dana Gibbs/Houston/Eott@Eott, Molly
Sample/Houston/Eott@Eott
cc:

Subject: EOTT fourth quarter earnings release

Attached is the most current release.  The second paragraph has been changed
to reflect the comments made at the 10:45 AM meeting.


no-they did not and Tori will be on vaction next Friday and Monday-would like
it done by Wed.-Nov 29-Thanks


Attached is the Enron Americas GasTrading violation memos for  Maturity Gap
Risk and VaR for June 19, 2001.  The Office of the Chairman for Enron
Americas is responsible for printing out a hard copy of this memo, signing it
and returning the hard copy to Chris Abel at 3155a, who will forward it to
RAC to obtain their signature.

Thank You


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 05/04/2001
08:21 AM ---------------------------
From: Veronica Espinoza/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/03/2001 09:57 AM
To: Diane Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron, Derek Bailey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David
Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean Bell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patricia Boulanger/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie Brewer/NA/Enron@Enron, Lesli
Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Celeste Cisneros/ENRON@enronXgate, Sharon
Crawford/CAL/ECT@ECT, Richard Deming/NA/Enron@Enron, Russell
Diamond/ENRON@enronXgate, Cindy Feldman/CAL/ECT@ECT, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Walter
Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate, Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam
Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol
McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Nidia Mendoza/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Bianca Ornelas/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie
Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Linda Sietzema/CAL/ECT@ECT, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ellen
Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON, Melinda Whalen/CAL/ECT@ECT, Tiffany
Williams/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Credit Report--5/3/01


As noted on the email I sent to you on November 16 on the subject of PRC
Deadlines and Meetings, I wanted to remind you that your Goals for 2001
document is due to your manager by Monday, December 11.

The goals should be a mixture of short-term and long-term goals.  For
example, a short-term goal could be to learn more about the functionality of
Enpower, while a long-term goal could be to move to the European office to
manage logistics.  It is important for management to know employee goals so
that management can help the employee get to where they want to go.

If you have any questions, ask your manager or me.


Thanks for the info on your trip.  Have a great time -- I will be anxious to
hear about the presentation in Natchez.  Love, Sally

SueW2@aol.com on 06/07/2000 10:29:03 AM
To: cwhite@viviance.com, sally.beck@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Trip plans

Hi Cindy and Sally,

Before I forget here are the phone numbers where we can be reached for the
next several days:

June 8th and 10th La Quinta in Alexandria, LA 318 442 3700

June 9th Monmouth Plantation Nachez 1-800-828-4531

We will be in Natchez until later in the afternoon on the 10th.

Mom


What design are you talking about?  Do I have pink elephants on all my emails
or something?

I'm very enthused that I have the skillset to be an advertising critic when I
grow up.  It's something I've always wanted to do.

PS.  I'm a little sarcastic as well.

From: Margaret Allen@ENRON on 09/27/2000 01:45 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Commercials

John, John, John....very impressive analysis!  The first two commercials were
supposed to be idealistic spots announcing Enron as an innovative company,
while the next four are proof points to our innovation by showing the
businesses we have created.

I know you were elated to get an email from me this morning, thus proving
that I had not been kidnapped and all those important things I work on would
continue to be completed.  Oh and that certainly is a pretty design you add
to your emails.  Very masculine!

Smile, Margaret

ps, i hope you can read my sarcasm over email -- if you knew me better, you
would understand it completely since it is rare that i'm in a totally serious
mood. hope you don't take offense!

	John Arnold@ECT
	09/27/2000 12:29 PM

		 To: Margaret Allen/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Commercials

I really liked the commercials about specifics (i.e.  weather, EOL,
bandwidth).  The metal man was definitely at a different philosophical level
than where my brain operates.  Still not quite sure what was going on there.
Ode was a bit too idealistic.   The campaign in general was very different
than previous.   But I guess you know that and that's the point.   Again, I
think the commercials that showed why we are the most innovative were very
impressive.  Just telling people we are innovative made less of an impact.

Sorry I ruined your run.  At least you weren't molested by the River Oaks car
thief.

From: Margaret Allen@ENRON on 09/27/2000 08:24 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Commercials

So, what did you think?!  Don't lie or stretch the truth either -- you won't
hurt my feelings, I promise.

By the way, by the time I arrived home it was completely dark so I went for a
three mile run this morning.  Not fun, but I'm definitely awake right now!
BUT, it's all your fault I couldn't go last night....he!he!

Trade well, MSA


Please find attached EOL product profile report dated 12-22-99.

thanks
brant


I think I'm driving in on Saturday morning, and staying with Bryan and Monica.  When are you getting to Austin?  Is your man coming with you?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tara Strawser <tstraws@qwest.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 3:22 PM
To:	Dean, Clint
Subject:	Re:

I don't know details.  What are your plans?  Any thoughts??  Julie and I talked
about maybe going to Hula Hut or Trudy's (for Mexican Martini's) Friday.  Any
suggestions?  Have you figured out what you are doing about this weekend?

Tara

Clint.Dean@enron.com wrote:

> No crap, me too.  Can you be more specific?
>
>  -----Original Message-----
> From:     Tara Strawser <tstraws@qwest.com>@ENRON
> Sent:     Tuesday, October 16, 2001 3:13 PM
> To:       Dean, Clint
> Subject:  Re:
>
> Going to Austin!!  Why?
>
> Tara
>
> "Dean, Clint" wrote:
>
> > Hey, what are your plans for this weekend?
> >
> > **********************************************************************
> > This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
> and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
> the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
> others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
> authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
> reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
> all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
> intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
> binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
> affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
> relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
> Thank you.
> > **********************************************************************
>
>  - tstraws.vcf << File: tstraws.vcf >>

 - tstraws.vcf << File: tstraws.vcf >>


----- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 05/21/2001 08:31 AM -----

	Mark Taylor
	05/09/2001 08:13 PM

		 To: Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: No More Confirms Agreement

Here is a first draft of an amendment agreement.  Please feel free to rip it
to shreds.


print
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 11/07/2000
12:21 PM ---------------------------

Alex Mcleish@ENRON
11/07/2000 10:39 AM
To: Chris Mahoney/LON/ECT@ECT, Niamh Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Ross
Koller/LON/ECT@ECT, John Buckner Thomas/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Jones/LON/ECT@ECT,
Alex Mcleish/EU/Enron@Enron, Tony O'Brien/LON/ECT@ECT, Henkka
Talvitie/LON/ECT@ECT, John Spencer/EU/Enron@Enron, jennifer.fraser@enron.com,
John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stewart
Peter/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Weekly Stats Outlook

Crude: Stocks have risen during this week over the last five years by an
average of 7 mbbls, the smallest increase being last year's 3 mbbls. One
reason the trend is likely to be repeated is that the SPR shipped 2.45 mbbls
last week, and this should again show up in PADD 3, while the drop in PADD 5
stocks (led by a sharp drop in imports) which offset the PADD 3 rise last
week is unlikely to occur a second week. Overall imports remain high, and
additional October barrels might just have found their way to the US from its
closer OPEC neghbours. On the other hand, we have the Capline shutdown (due
to lack of crude) which took place last week, and an increase in refinery
runs out of turnaround, but I don't believe that will offset the factors
pointing to a large build in crude stocks. (Consensus forecast up 2.5 mbbls.
API still lower than the DOE by 2.4 mbbls)

Distillate: After rising steadily since mid July, demand finally turned south
last week, with a 640 kbd drop. This is the first evidence that borrowed
demand is now being paid back. A second week of stats would confirm this, but
the weakening sentiment on cracks lends some support to the theory. The build
last week occurred despite a strong drop in imports - providing demand stays
low, higher runs and high distillate yields should see a build, perhaps in
excess of 1 mbbls. (Consensus forecast up 1 mbbls)

Mogas: Gasoline demand has been sluggish for most of the year, but October
sales were relatively strong, especially last week, which topped 8.7 mbd (8.9
in the DOEs), not far off the year's highs. October deliveries are invariably
higher than both Sep and Nov, so the most likely direction for demand is
down. Imports from Canada and Europe are said to be on the way, but may take
some time before they show up in the stats - although some improvement should
be seen after last week's miserly 212 kbd which accounted for much of the
draw. However, the gasoline tanker stuck in NYH may skew the stats. PADD 1
again bore the lion's share of last week's draw, bringing stocks down to
their lowest level since at least 1976 - it has lost 7 mbbls in four weeks.
For RFG too, the region is looking short. This week is hard to call, but may
point to a build, on the basis that strong demand and weak imports aren't
sustained. (Consensus forecast down 1.5 mbbls. API still higher than DOE by
2.6 mbbls.)

Stocks graphs attached


Here it is.

Peggy Mahoney@EES
09/12/2000 11:19 AM
To: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: testimony

Can I plez have a copy of Steve's testimony from yesterday in San Diego?

Thanks
Peggy


The Methanol plant has determined extensive repairs are needed, including
replacement of piping and retubing of 2 of the 3 preheat exchangers.

It appears that the plant will be down until the last week of the month.  At
a minimum, the plant will be down until the middle of next week.    A better
estimate of downtime will be available by tomorrow afternoon.


Theresa,

Don't worry about it....looks good now.
Thanks!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Staab, Theresa
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 1:35 PM
To:	Vela, Valerie; 'robert.poole@atmosenergy.com'
Subject:	Greeley Gas - September 2001

Okay Guys -  Call me CRAZY!

I don't know what I did, but I had the wrong Gas Daily pricing in the spreadsheet for September.

Please accept my apology... One would have thought I'd have this down pat by now.

Sorry about this.  I hope this is the last revision for September.

Call me if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Theresa

 << File: Greeley Gas September 01.xls >>


do a mud pie thing


---------------------- Forwarded by Reyna Cabrera/ET&S/Enron on 12/11/2000
01:43 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Dan Fancler                           10/26/2000 10:14 AM

To: Reyna Cabrera/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: OGE SBA #106081

If we need to cashout for operational reasons then $500,993.10 is a fair
price.

If we need the gas then they should pay the value of the gas which is
estimated at $728,274.40.

So the answer is
If we want the cashout get at least $500,993.
If they want the cashout and we need gas get $728,274.

Receivable


"Taylor, Rob" <robtaylor@akllp.com> on 12/08/2000 12:21:28 PM
To: "Kay Mann (E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>, "Roseann M Engeldorf (E-mail)"
<Roseann.Engeldorf@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Override Letter

Winston & Strawn would like to see a draft of the Override Letter.  Is
there a draft that we can send them?

Rob Taylor
Andrews & Kurth L.L.P.
600 Travis Street
Suite 4200
Houston, Texas  77002

Tel: (713) 220-4436
Fax: (713) 238-7273
e-mail: robtaylor@andrews-kurth.com

This e-mail is privileged and confidential and is intended only for the
recipient(s) named above.  If you are not the intended recipient, please
(i) do not read, copy, use or disclose the contents hereof to others
(any of the foregoing being strictly prohibited), (ii) notify the sender
immediately of your receipt hereof, and (iii) delete this e-mail and all
copies of it.


Here is the Stoddard image-one more to go.


Please ignore my previous e-mail which included the wrong attachment.


================================================================
As requested, your News Alert for TXN
follows from EquityAlert.com.
To edit/discontinue your alerts please refer to end of message.
PLEASE REVIEW THE NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER BELOW
================================================================

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-= Paid Advertisement -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Probex Successfully Closes on $12.5 Million Financing

Probex Corp. (AMEX: PRB) Financing to assist in continuing
engineering and development work leading up to construction of
Wellsville, OH, reprocessing facility.  Groundbreaking set for
first quarter 2001.  Probex - New, patented, unparalleled, highly
economic and environmentally beneficial motor oil reprocessing
technology.

For more information, click:
http://205.210.134.51/a1.asp?ID=1255aa

AOL USERS: copy & paste the link above into your browser.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

TI, Insight Electronics Extend Distribution Relationship

DALLAS and OAKLAND, Calif., Dec 11, 2000 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ -- Texas
Instruments Incorporated (NYSE: TXN) (TI) and Insight Electronics, a member of
the Memec Group, announced today they will expand the distributor relationship
that existed prior to TI's acquisition of Burr Brown. Insight has been the
leading distributor in the Americas for the TI-Burr Brown precision analog
products for the past seven years.

The focus of the new agreement is to give Insight customers that design
communications, computing, audio and video imaging systems greater access to
the
most comprehensive selection of high performance analog and mixed signal
solutions. Insight will also provide bill-of-material support for customers
with
the full TI product offering, including TI's digital signal processing (DSP)
product portfolio.

"Insight has a track record of success supporting customers with Burr Brown
products, said John Simari, worldwide director of distribution, Texas
Instruments. We want to leverage Insight's strengths across TI, especially
TI's
analog and mixed signal product portfolio, to further our growth in this
important area."

The full TI analog product line will be available in the Americas through
Insight by January 1, 2001. Product stocking and training is expected to be
complete by the end of 1Q01. In the interim, Insight will continue to
represent
the TI-Burr Brown precision analog products.

"The customer solution focus shared by Insight and TI makes this a perfect
fit,"
said Greg Provenzano, president and CEO of Insight Electronics. "This
partnership allows uninterrupted support to our TI-Burr Brown customers, in
addition to an enhanced offering of technology products.

"Insight has always been focused on the technical design community and its
needs, especially in the analog area," said Provenzano. "Coupling our
strengths
with TI's initiative to grow its position in precision analog provides great
synergy and will help designers bring advanced systems to market faster and
more
efficiently."

About Insight Electronics

Insight Electronics is the largest technical distributor of semiconductors in
North and South America. With 55 divisions in the U.S., Mexico, Canada and
South
America, and a focused line-card of 25 leading semiconductor companies,
Insight's sales team and field application engineers are thoroughly
knowledgeable about their suppliers' products, processes and technologies. The
company's value-added services, combined with its expertise in design,
inventory
management, logistics and use of e-business tools, ensure that customers
receive
the products they need, when and where they need them. Web address is
www.insight-electronics.com.

About Texas Instruments

Texas Instruments Incorporated is the world leader in digital signal
processing
and analog technologies, the semiconductor engines of the Internet age. The
company's businesses also include sensors and controls, and educational and
productivity solutions. TI is headquartered in Dallas, Texas, and has
manufacturing or sales operations in more than 25 countries.

Texas Instruments is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol
TXN.
More information is located on the World Wide Web at: http://www.ti.com.

SOURCE Texas Instruments Incorporated Semiconductor Group

CONTACT:          Texas Instruments Incorporated Semiconductor Group,
800-477-8924, ext. 4500

URL:              http://www.insight-electronics.com
http://www.prnewswire.com

(C) 2000 PR Newswire.  All rights reserved.

-0-

KEYWORD:          Texas
California
INDUSTRY KEYWORD: CPR

****************** TO EDIT YOUR EQUITY ALERTS ********************
To unsubscribe or edit your alerts, visit
http://www.equityalert.com/alerts.asp?uid=alewis34&xid=40352
******************************************************************

***IMPORTANT NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER REGARDING THIS COURTESY EMAIL**
At your request, as a subscriber to our service, this email alert
is being sent to you as a courtesy and is for information purposes
only.  We are a financial news re-distributor.  We are not an
investment advisory and do not purport to tell or suggest which
companies you should monitor or which securities you should
purchase or sell.
In addition to the information regarding the company you are
monitoring (the &Monitored Company8), this email contains an
advertisement describing a product, service or company for which we
received a fee, at our normal advertising rates of $55 per 1,000 e-
mails (subject to volume and other discounts), from the advertising
company.  In addition, not withstanding our policy of prohibiting
employees from buying or selling securities of an advertising
company for a period of 20 days following dissemination of the
advertisement, we may not be able to effectively monitor our
employees to ensure compliance with the same. Consequently, there
may be sales and/or purchases of such securities by our employees
prior to, during and immediately following the dissemination of the
advertisement.
Please note that (1) this email may not contain the full text of
the press release issued by, or the research or other reports
regarding, the Monitored Company; and (2) the text of the
advertisement, the press release and/or reports were obtained from
third party sources and were not written, generated or edited by
us; accordingly, we make no representations or give any assurance
as to the accuracy or completeness, nor have we conducted any
independent investigations of, the disclosures regarding the
subject matter of such releases and reports.
Please note that links to the advertising company and/or Monitored
Company are provided for your convenience.  We assume no obligation
for the content of such sites.
All information contained herein should be independently verified
by you with the advertising company or with Monitored Company or
any other sources you prefer.
[THIS IS ONLY A SUMMARY OF, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO, THE &EQUITYALERT SUBSCRIBER AGREEMENT AND
DISCLAIMER.8 PLEASE VISIT
http://www.equityalert.com/home/disclaim.asp
FOR ACCESS TO OUR COMPLETE DISCLAIMER]
******************************************************************


I have attached the updated version of this document and it can also be
accessed on the O drive at
O:dcd/powerdoc/kimberlyH/not to be confirmed deals.doc

I left Bonneville Power Administration in Red because I would like to
research that one a little further.
Please let me know if you have anything to add.  Thanks for your help!
Kim


Hopefully, none of these transactions have been "booked" for ENA by a trader
located in a foreign country.  That said, the general rule is that
intra-company transactions are generally booked directly to RMT rather than
to ENA and then back to RMT.  I have cc'd Rhett Jackson on my reply so that
he can confirm this since Rhett has become the "keeper" of the RMT technology
for our group.  Sorry for the delay in responding.  Steve.

From: Sara Shackleton on 09/07/2000 01:18 PM
To: Jeff Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen H Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RMT Masters - booking trades

The following Enron companies have recently booked financial trades with
ENA.  I think these should be booked directly with RMT.  Please advise.

Enron Netherlands Holding BV

Enron Development Funding Ltd.

EnronCredit.com Limited

Thanks for your help.  Sara


When you have a minute to review this, can we meet so you can handle this
response to Anthony.  Thanks.
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 10/30/2000 03:40 PM -----

	Anthony Campos
	10/30/2000 03:39 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Confirmations

Tana,

Per our last discussion, could you please verify the Contracts listed below
in the following attachment along with their corresponding Confirming
Entities?  These results shall be given, along with the other list of
Agreements that have been researched, to Bob Bowen.

Thank You,
Anthony


I took several assignments from the last World Hunger call.  Status as
follows:

a.   Tax language-  I have sent a prior version of Rev 4 jr to Matt G asking
him to call me to let me know when he can talk with GE tax rep.  Steve Swifit
and I are in London and would like to sit in on that call.

b.   Insurance Language review.   I sent same version to David Marshall and
Paul Parrish asking for their reviews and opinion as to whether 7FA's are new
technology.

c.   I "volunteered" to look at the termination language in world hunger, GE
had some problems, and I had the same problem with the ARCOs contract.   I
drafted a fix last Friday, sent to Kay M for comment.  I have included my
suggested changes in the attached redline.  I have forwarded same fix to GE
at end Friday for Arcos.    I have asked Kay if she still has a concern with
the Limit of Liability as it relates to termination.  I think it works.

d.  I "volunteered" to work over Article 10, Exhibit B-3 and Exhibit B-6 in
relation to Guarantees and liquidated damages.  I have done that in the
attached redline of the T&C and Exhibits.

e. Some time ago I volunteered to resurrect the language associated with the
reduction in the LD refund in Section 10.9.8.   I had sent out a couple weeks
ago but received no reaction.    I have entered that fix in the attached
redline.

f.  I have made several minor changes to definitions associated with
performance.

Attached is Rev4-JR version of GE T&C's and Exhibits for world hunger.  They
start from the clean rev 4 version of the T&Cs that Peter forwarded to me at
my request.  The attached are redlined to show my changes.

I have not sent any of this to GE except for the termination language fix.
I suggest that the Enron team give these a quick read before the World hunger
call.  I can print same here and share with GE during the call unless there
is an objection.

I hope this will help to advance the process.  My earlier emails to Paul and
Matt were not intended confuse the situation with different drafts.  Please
ignore those and for the above purposes use the attached files.

Kay- I suggest that you forward to others who you feel appropriate for the
purposes of the world hunger call on Wednesday.


Sara:
Whoever inherits the Deutsche Bank file from me needs to look at this latest
draft.  I will indicate this on the updated memo that I send around shortly.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 07/19/00 12:48 PM -----

	steven.kessler@db.com
	07/11/00 02:10 PM

		 To: Carol.St.Clair@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: DB/Enron ISDA

Hi Carol:

Enclosed is latest draft.  Please note that I changed DB's Threshold at A+
to bring it into line with Enron's rating.  I also added a sweep-in clause
to deal with the BT Transactions (Section 18).  Please let me know if those
provisions are acceptable.  Subject to internal DB approvals, I think the
other substantive points still open are (i) a Moody's rating for the MAC
clause, (ii) the demand section in the Guaranty, and (iii) determining the
L/C provisions and mechanics.  Please let me know who your replacement on
this matter will be and, if we don't speak before you leave, good luck and
congratulations.

Regards,

Steve

---------------------- Forwarded by Steven Kessler on 07/11/2000 03:09 PM
---------------------------

07/11/2000 01:49 PM
Kelly Habenicht
Kelly Habenicht
Kelly Habenicht
07/11/2000 01:49 PM
07/11/2000 01:49 PM

To:   Steven Kessler@Bankers_Trust
cc:
Subject:

(See attached file: ENRON SCHEDULE (NEW VERSION).DOC)(See attached file:
ENRON PARAGRAPH 13.DOC)

 - ENRON SCHEDULE (NEW VERSION).DOC
 - ENRON PARAGRAPH 13.DOC


Per my voice mail...somehow my intent to copy you on this didn't work.
Shona's extension is 39123 and she is sitting on the 30th floor.  --Sally
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 05/25/2000 07:35 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Sally Beck                           05/23/2000 09:34 AM

To: Milind Laad/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: Re: Enron Trading

My new employee who will be working with me on global standards for
operations for all trading/origination locations started with Enron
yesterday.  Her name is Shona Wilson, and I do not know her extension.  She
was in orientation yesterday, and I will be meeting with her today from 9:30
to 10:30 to discuss her initial assignments, of which working with India is
one.   I will have her contact you later today.  Although she is new to
Enron, she has had extensive experience with Price Waterhouse Coopers in
internal audit, controls and process redesign for trading firms, both in the
US and in Europe.  She will work with other seasoned professionals on my team
to set up the infrastructure that is needed in India.   --Sally

To: Wanda Curry/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill Gathmann/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Re: Enron Trading

Wanda/Sally,

Can I talk to the person sometime today or tomorrow?. Please provide me with
the name and tel no. Thanks and Regards.

Milind

Wanda Curry@ECT
19-05-2000 08:49 PM
To: Milind Laad/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Enron Trading

I had a chance to review your presentation.  Bill and I have been working
with Sally Beck, Global Energy Ops and she will identify a  resource to help
insure all internal controls (specific to  trading activities) are in place
in India.   As I understand the plan for coal, India will function mostly as
an origination unit  with the London office being responsible for supplying
the coal.  Therefore, the net Enron position will probably be carried in the
London books.   However, risk books will still be required in India to
determine the net  MTM  for the 3rd party sales commitments in India.  These
books should include both the intercompany purchase from London  and the 3rd
party sales.  The commercial group in India  will be responsible for local
curves  (location (basis) specific - usually transportation costs), and
energy operations (this will probably be you  initially until the trading
activity has grown) will be responsible for the deal capture process
(including contract administration), a settlement process and risk management
administration (daily valuation and reporting of risk books).   Accounting
will be responsible for the reconciliation of risk books to the general
ledger and financials.    There will also be a logistics process.   The
following questions need to be addressed:

  With the increased  coal volumes will an increase in trading limits be
required?
      My understanding that the London coal group will be responsible for
determining this and working with Ted Murphy to change the
      policy, if necessary.
  What trading activities will be performed in India vs. London?
      The answer to this is needed to determine the control infrastructure
required for the India office.

Sally's employee starts on Monday,   I will let you know who she is and
arrange a call.    You can rest assured, that although this may seen
complicated (and it is), Sally's Energy Ops team will be able to hold your
hand all the way through this process.    It will be critical that we
demonstrate the control infrastructure is in place, before we can obtain
sigh-off for trading from Rick Buy.

Looking forward to helping you get this ready for a July 1 start date.

Thanks,
Wanda Curry

To: Wanda Curry@ECT
cc: Bill Gathmann/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Enron Trading

Wanda,

It was nice talking to you on the conference call. Have you had a chance to
review my presentation?. Your comments would be extremely helpful to me. When
we setup the Risk/Credit/Accnt/MIS/Internal Control function, I want to make
sure we do it RIGHT the FIRST time, keeping in mind that there is always room
for improvement later.

In addition, I would like to discuss with you certain thought I have on the
accounting, budgeting,internal controls and internal audit areas in EIPL. Do
you plan to travel to India in the near future. Please let me know.

Thanks and Regards.


Sally, FYI - We've had many complaints and I've had many discussions today
with Dave N. and Inja. They did discover some system board that is going to
be replaced tonight. Hopefully replacing the board will do it but history
makes me skeptical that this is the sole cause for the slow performance.

Needless to say we had to get Settlements and Volume Management to stop their
work and we still didn't see any improvement. I know everyone is just as
frustrated as Logistics. At our last several meetings to discuss this problem
I was insistent that unless they have an answer it seems to me, and the rest
of the staff, that the system just cannot support the real heavy demand that
first of month noms and the monthly close require.

I've included an email I received from Kathy Kelly if you want some gory
detail. To save you the trouble it normally takes 2-3 minutes to create
nominations on the largest pipes today some have taken as long as 55
minutes.

I'll keep you posted - Bob
---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Superty/HOU/ECT on 02/28/2000
04:52 PM ---------------------------

Robert Superty
02/28/2000 04:47 PM
To: Inja Chun/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dave Nommensen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Unify

FYI - Inja, Dave - Please read Kathy's memo below.

Don't know what to tell them. We've been down this road at the same time of
the month over and over again.

Any suggestions - Bob
---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Superty/HOU/ECT on 02/28/2000
04:30 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Katherine L Kelly                           02/28/2000 04:26 PM

To: Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Unify

Bob,

You have probably already caught wind of this since it seems to be the only
thing anyone is talking about today, but I wanted to bring it to your
attention that unify is at an all time pathetic slowness today.  Basically,
this is all I've heard about today from the schedulers.  Clarissa has just
handed me a screen print that shows that it took 33.23 minutes to create a
nom on Tennessee.  Robert has informed me that it has taken him 55 minutes to
create a nom on Columbia Gas.  It took me over 30 minutes to log on today and
as soon as I ran a report, it kicked me out saying that I didn't have enough
memory.

This has always been a problem at the end of the month, but this month has
reached in all time low.  I've talked to Dave about three or four times today
and so has Ed.  Ed has been monitoring the system and he seems to think that
client services has been taking a large part of the CPU time.  We have both
questioned Dave on this, but he doesn't seem to see anything unusual with the
amount of users from accounting, although he does agree that a huge amount of
CPU time is being used.

I hate to end this on a  negative note, but at this rate, no one will be
clean by 1:45 tomorrow.  I don't know what the status is as far as people
looking into ways to make unify faster, but maybe it is time to draw some
attention to this again.

By the way, the bridge from sitara to unify has also been crawling today.
I've already informed Dave of this, but the bridge was totally out of
commission this past weekend as well.   This effected those people who tried
to get a jump start on cleaning for the month and working on the first of the
month noms.  I hate to say it, but once again, how can we expect people to
get their work done, if we don't give them systems that work.  On a good
note, I did get feedback from Clarissa that terminal server was working well
over the weekend.  Unfortunately, she said that unify was terribly slow, but
no slower than it is when she's here in the office.


Greetings from the land of watery-eyed, flat-assed office workers! How goes
the burly mountain man thing? I've been hearing second hand from Elliot that
you're faring extremely well mentally despite some poorly crafted sleeping
bags and a bad case of frostbite on your toes. (That second part I made up,
but it sounded appropriate given the sleeping bag situation.) All's well
here. As you could imagine, and probably often do, the sweeping expanse of
people staring at computers that is Enron has changed not at all since you
left. There are still many computers, many of them have changed positions,
some have gone away, most we are not sad to see go. That's just the nature of
this cutthroat business. Also on the stagnantly invariable list is the status
of my life in relation to Enron. I am still here. I still stare at the
computer. Every once in awhile I meander over to the dark window-less corner
that enshrouds the IT wizards and ask them silly questions like, "What does
it mean when I hit this button and my screen starts flashing at me like a
disco ball, then makes this awkward shrieking noise and finally goes black?"
They are incredibly helpful. I am still pretty much clueless about most
things, although I've learned to talk about them with a semblance of
authority, as in, "No, you twit, the 25 megawatt off peak deal should clearly
be flowing across SP-15 to NP-15 because of the illiquidity of SP's market
right now. What kind of idiot wouldn't hedge their position in California at
a time like this?" It all sounds very exotic and important to me, which is
why I'm still here. But I'm infinitely jealous of your wild exploits in the
great American outdoors. I suspect my forbearance for sitting in an office
will run out right around the middle of the summer, so I'm planning a trip to
coincide with that meltdown. I haven't decided between a road trip through
the western United States or just a direct flight to Paris. Both sound good,
and way beyond my budget, therefore equally attractive. Well, I've managed to
say practically nothing for long enough now. I do hope you're having an
amazing time, rambling on toward the next crazy adventure on the horizon as I
believe Jack Kerouac once wrote. We're all very proud of you here and
constantly refer to you as "my good friend Winston who's skiing across the
state of Wyoming, which was my idea." I'd love to hear about your trip direct
from the source, although I know you're extremely busy out there, skiing and
killing wild animals for sustenance and whatnot. But please do write
back....if you can still move your fingers.

Sincerely,
Kate
(the slightly ditsy one who sits in the middle of the room and tries to look
constantly busy)


My copy had redlines.  I passed the comments on to Leslie Hansen, an attorney
in our Group for review.

	Bruce Harris@ENRON
	11/28/2000 05:20 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Bruce Harris/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: EnronCredit documentation

Tna,

Lets discuss tomorrow when you have some time.  They unfortunately did not
redline!

Regards,  Bruce
---------------------- Forwarded by Bruce Harris/NA/Enron on 11/28/2000 05:13
PM ---------------------------

rsbaker@duke-energy.com on 11/28/2000 12:20:02 PM
To: Bruce.Harris@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Re: EnronCredit documentation

(See attached file: Enron Credit.com Limited 1.doc)

Bruce,
I finally got counsel to review the confidentiality agreement that you sent
me back on October 26.  I have attached the document complete with
counsel's changes.

Hopefully, the requested changes will not be of an extraordinary nature and
we will be able to move forward from here.

Please call me with any questions or issues.

Regards,

Randy S. Baker
Director, Credit Risk
Duke Energy Corp.
(713) 975-4203
 - Enron Credit.com Limited 1.doc


[IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] "At Last...Making Money From Home Has Never Been Easier!"    Our proven step-by-step system for helping you make money with a powerful home based business is not only lucrative, but it will also help you keep thousands of dollars in your pocket on tax day.   Find out if you qualify to be a part of what many home based business experts are calling a "revolutionary system" for making money from home.   Which best describes your lifestyle now?     [IMAGE] [IMAGE]Working 50-60 hours per week just to maintain your current lifestyle  [IMAGE]Waking up to an alarm clock every morning   [IMAGE]Settling for a used car with unending monthly payments   [IMAGE]Struggling to make mortgage payments on a house that's too small   -OR-  [IMAGE] [IMAGE]Enjoying more free time with family and friends  [IMAGE]Waking up when your eyes open and your body tells you to   [IMAGE]Driving the brand new car of your choice  [IMAGE]Living in your dream home with the mortgage paid for   We can show you how to start your own home based business and create your "New Millennium Lifestyle"   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]Are you tired of waking up to an alarm clock everyday?  [IMAGE]Fed up with fighting the traffic to and from work?  [IMAGE]Sick of missing out on activities with family because  you're too busy working?  [IMAGE]Frustrated because there's never enough money to do  what you really want?    Well, Your "New Millennium Lifestyle" is a simple decision away      [IMAGE]     What is the New Millennium Lifestyle?  [IMAGE]Making money from home  [IMAGE]Not having to commute to an office to work for someone else  [IMAGE]Spending more time with your friends and family  [IMAGE]Having the ability to earn as much money as you're worth    "It is anticipated that by the year 2005, 50% of households in the US alone will be involved in a home based business." - Newsweek Magazine    For more information about making money from home... CLICK HERE    Who's starting home based businesses? Doctors, lawyers, construction workers, farmers, college students, stay at home moms and dads... in fact, just about everybody)   Here's what some of them had to say... I looked into several home based businesses and most of them required $5000 or more to get started. I almost couldn't believe it when I found out I could start this business for a few hundred dollars. Bob LaRoche, Columbus, OH   As a stay at home parent I needed a business that was truly home based. This system really works! I made my start up money back in less than 1 week. Even my kids join in and help out. Milena Christopher, Austin, TX   I thought a business with this type of potential would mean me having to risk a lot! I listened to the conference call and loved the fact that all I needed was a credit card or a check, and I could start making money right away. I've already referred this business to some of my friends. Sean Cheyney, Chicago, IL  Unlike most home based businesses, we're not looking for just anyone. We offer something almost unheard of in the industry:  Proven stability - Plus - Accelerated worldwide growth potential    So, if you're tired of living the "typical lifestyle" and you're serious about making a change, we'd like to show you how our proven system works.   CLICK HERE   Copyright ? 2000 Bamboo Inc. All Rights Reserved.    [IMAGE] [IMAGE]

If the above links do not work or appear, simply copy this URL and paste it into your browser's address field:http://www.makingmoneyfromhome.net/information.asp?ID=custom

Your privacy is extremely important to us. You requested to receive recurring mailings, by registering at CustomOffers.com or by subscribing through one of our marketing partners. As a leader in permission-based email marketing, we are committed to delivering a highly rewarding experience, with offers that include bargains, entertainment, and  money-making ideas. However, if you wish to unsubscribe, click here  or link to http://web1.customoffers.com/unsubscribe.asp?emid=790&email=PMIMS@ENRON.COM
Third-party offers contained in this email are the sole responsibility of the offer originator.
[IMAGE]


Mike,

Please, sign and return to me.

Vince


Even though I have not seen te bill, I do have a concern that it will prevent
us from making our 3rd Q earnings. How bad is it?

	Peter Keohane
	07/31/2000 10:31 AM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda Sietzema/CAL/ECT@ECT, Rob
Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Stanley

Dan Fournier phoned this morning to say he is sending you his initial
account, with a copy to me.  If you or Mark have any concerns please let me
know.

NOTE:  We have set up a separate RC for Stanley so that all costs are billed
back to Lavorato.  Your assistant can call Linda Sietzema for details
(403-974-6708).


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 10/24/2000 05:24 PM -----

	"Fergus, Gary S." <GFergus@brobeck.com>
	10/24/2000 04:45 PM

		 To: "Richard B. Sanders Esq. (E-mail)" <richard.b.sanders@enron.com>
		 cc: "Meringolo, Peter" <PMeringolo@brobeck.com>
		 Subject: Some thoughts on options

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE

Richard,

 After today's discussion here are our brainstorming ideas on
options:

1.   WAIT FOR A BETTER PROTECTIVE ORDER
 Ask Harvey Morris where they are on fixing the protective order that
is being litigated by others.  If the protective order has not  changed,
then unilaterally postpone production until it is.  Pro: Better protection
and more time; Con: Even with a more stringent
 protective order Enron still questions whether the PUC is entitled
to financial performance data.  Thus, this option does not fully
disclose all of Enron's positions and the company may be accused later of
simply engaging in delaying tactics.  Under this option  we file our
formal objections as well.

2. TURN OVER THE TRANSACTION DATA AS IS
 Continue on our present course of turning over transaction data for
electricity that was delivered.  Pro: PUC will get the data  anyway
either through FERC, unfair competition, antitrust or price gouging
litigation.  By turning over the data that will show  profits, PUC might
slow down investigation there as opposed to interrupting the business by
seeking to depose witnesses etc.  Con:  This would be waiving the
legitimate question that Enron has as to the PUC's ability to discovery this
information through a  subpoena.  There is also a question of how
confidential this data would be given the current political agenda.  It
might also serve  to whet the appetite of the PUC for more Enron
information and discovery.   This option would also provide confidential
proprietary information to the PUC about how Enron gets its competitive
advantage.

3. TURN OVER DATA FOR OUTSIDE OF CALIFORNIA AND LET PUC GET REST OF
DATA FROM ISO AND PX.
 We have told the PUC we do not want to duplicate the efforts of ISO
and PX so the way to relieve the burden on us is to give  only missing
data. PRO:  It would be easier and quicker to just give the outside of
California data and would sidestep for the
 moment the ongoing jurisdictional question.  Con:  Without Enron
cost data for the California ISO and PX transactions, the PUC
 would not be able to arrive at what they want -- a profit and loss
picture.  We would have a hard time representing to the PUC that  the
combination of the PUC data and the Enron data would be all that they need
to calculate the answers to Request Nos. 7-10.

4. TURN OVER EVERYTHING BUT PRICE
 This option would simple omit the price data.  Pro:  It would not
reveal the profit and loss information.  Con:  It would not reveal the
profit and loss information.  In other words, the PUC is clear that this is
what they are after.  By giving them everything else, we
 would in effect be telling them we will not turn over profit and
loss.  Moreover, by piecing some of it together with the ISO and PX
data, the PUC might be able to put together a revenue picture which will be
quite large, but just not the cost or expense side.

5. DECLINE TO PRODUCE THE DATA
 We would tell Harvey Morris that Enron has reconsidered its position
for the following reasons:  (1) Our firm belief that the PUC is  not
entitled to the profit and loss data they are seeking; (2) in his latest
email, Harvey has made it clear that the PUC wants more  data (1999)
than we discussed earlier; (3) continued threat that if they do not like the
transaction data they will come back and  ask for profit and loss
information that we do not believe they are entitled to; (4) Commissioner
Wood's statement that the purpose  of this investigation is to get
money from market participants in the hands of consumers; (5) investigation
by the AG into activities  of other market participants and the notice
that other governmental agencies are cooperating -- who are we producing
this  information to and for what purpose; (6) Enron favors public
disclosure of trading data but only if all participants are required to
do so; (7) Enron is a small player in this market and many other market
participants are not involved in the process BPA etc.    PRO:  This
may be the only way to preserve Enron's challenge to the jurisdiction of the
PUC to get this data.  Moreover, in the  current political
environment there is no assurance where this information will be leaked.  It
also makes sense to see what FERC  will do with their published 11/1/00
report on investigation date. Under this option, we file our formal
objections and sit back and  wait.

6. ME TOO
 Upon reflection, we agree with the approach taken by the other
market participants.  We will not produce until the protective order  is
modified and then only data that is within the PUC jurisdiction.  PRO:  This
makes it look like all the market participants are  acting in concert
and really is no different than option 1 above.  Moreover, if you read
Reliant's responses, they appear ready to  turn over financial data if
the protective order is modified. (Terry and Mike Day are both out of their
offices today.)  Note that  Williams is adopting a strategy that says
the PUC needs to go to Superior Court to enforce its subpoena.  This may be
met with  strong opposition by the PUC given their California
constitutional contempt authority.

7. MOVE TO QUASH BEFORE THE ALJ
 Here we would raise all of the arguments that we have about why the
PUC does not have jurisdiction and fight it out on the merits  before the
ALJ.  PRO:  The ALJ is a forum to raise the jurisdictional questions.  It
has the least procedural risks of being  dismissed.  CON:  Reading
the tea leaves, we believe it unlikely that the ALJ will determine that the
PUC has no jurisdiction.
 Moreover, because the PUC has its own constitutionally granted
contempt power, the PUC will take the view (according to Mike  Day) that
they need not go to the Superior Court for enforcement.  They will also take
the view that the Superior Court has no  jurisdiction  to hear our
appeal.  Appeals have to go to the PUC and those orders are appealable at
the Court of Appeal level.   Thus, the only de novo review of our
objections might be at the ALJ level.

8. FILE DECLARATORY RELIEF ACTION IN FEDERAL COURT IN CALIFORNIA
 We would claim federal question jurisdiction under the Federal Power
Act and in particular the provisions of 824(g) under which the PUC
issued its subpoena in part.  The dispute to be decided is whether the PUC
has the jurisdiction to seek the profit and  loss information from the
wholesale market.  The authority for this would be Mississippi Power & Light
v. Mississippi  487 US  354 (bright line between wholesale market regulated
by FERC and the retail market regulated by states); Bristol Energy Corp v.
New Hampshire 13 F.3d 471 (1st Cir. 1994)(federal question whether state
agency can inquire into business and financial data  in the wholesale
market but found no cognizable claim.)  PRO:  The federal forum may be more
even handed than the ALJ, but  the question is whether we can state a
cognizable claim.  There may be greater protections from disclosure of the
information as  well.  CON:  The PUC may continue on a parallel track unless
we are able to obtain injunctive relief.  The PUC might seek  discovery of
the same information in the Federal court proceeding.  We should assume that
this action will trigger the strongest  response from the PUC and/or the AG
in form of further investigations or alternative forums for getting the same
information (e.g  unfair business practice suit, price gouging,
anti-trust etc.).   We should anticipate deposition requests for traders
etc.  By taking  this position, we will clearly be conceding that if
FERC asks for the data it is germane to their authority.

9. SEPARATE RESPONSES/STRATEGIES FOR DIFFERENT ENRON ENTITIES
 It may make some sense to chart a different course for Portland
General, EES and EEMC and continue to produce some data from  those
entities.  PRO:  The information provided for these entities is not likely
to generate profit and loss information that would be  germane to the fight
we are about to engage in (e.g. EES's description of % off tariff rates for
example.)  For Portland General,  Dave Aamodt is out of the office and
not able to participate in any change of direction discussions.

Hope this is helpful.
Thanks
Gary

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com


Attached is a list of four deals for some online "oops" trades.  Can you send
me the deal particulars so I can prepare terminations of the trades.
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 04/25/2001 10:04 AM -----

	Robert B Cass/ENRON@enronXgate
	04/25/2001 09:50 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny/ENRON@enronXgate
		 Subject: FW: Request Termination Agreements for 4 EnronOnline Transactions
W/ ATTACHMENT

Tana -
This e-mail includes the attachment.  It "fell off" my e-mail from last night.

Thanks -
Rob

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Cass, Robert B.
Sent: Tuesday, April  24, 2001 6:29 PM
To: Jones, Tana
Cc: Moorer, Torrey; Denny, Jennifer; Thomas, Sheri
Subject: Request Termination Agreements for 4 EnronOnline Transactions

Hi Tana -

We need your assistance in preparing termination letters for the transactions
listed on the attached spreadsheet and described as follows:

On Friday, April 20, 2001, four transactions occurred on EnronOnline that
were in error.  One transaction was with Coral Energy Holding L.P. and three
transactions were with Morgan Stanley Capital Group, Inc.  As mutually agreed
to by both the Enron commercial team and the respective counterparties, it
was decided that each of the four transactions would not be confirmed and
should be terminated.

The exact specifics are detailed as follows:

? The transactions occurred due to an inadvertent entry in the actual
production system of EnronOnline by a Product Control Group member, Melba
Lozano.  Melba activated a product assuming that she was in the EnronOnline
test system of EnronOnline.

? The product transacted upon is normally managed by Frank Ermis.  However,
in his absence on Friday, the product was managed by Matt Lenhart.

? Steve South, trader on the West Desk, called and notified both Morgan and
Coral that the product had been posted in error.  All parties agreed that the
transactions were not reflective of the normal pricing.  As a result they
further agreed that transaction confirmations would not be necessary and that
the deals would be "killed" on all sides.  (For reference of any telephone
tapes that may need to be pulled, the conversations with the counterparties
occurred around 2:00 pm.)

? No confirmations were generated as a result of the killing of the
transactions in TAGG.

? I spoke with Mike Grigsby on Monday (April 23, 2001) and advised him that
termination letters may be required by Legal.  He responded that he had no
problem with that.

Tana, please advise if additional information is required to complete the
termination letters or if another course of action is warranted.

Thank you,

Rob Cass
x35491


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

April 13, 2001 5:00pm through April 16, 2001 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI SERVER:        SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:  SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET: No Scheduled Outages.

MESSAGING: No Scheduled Outages.

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS:
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Sun 4/15/2001 at  4:45:00 AM thru Sun 4/15/2001 at  7:00:00 AM
Outage:  General maintenance for server dserv2
Disruption:  Total Disruption of Service
Environments Impacted:  Backup DNS Server
Purpose: General maintenance
Backout: BAck out the patches
restart server
Contact(s):  Malcolm Wells

Impact:  CORP
Time:  Sun 4/15/2001 at  5:00:00 AM thru Sun 4/15/2001 at  7:00:00 AM
Outage:  Migration off fddi and general maintenance for server reporter.  The
new IP address will be 172.16.2.166.
Disruption:  Total Disruption of Service
Environments Impacted:  UNIFY
Purpose: Corporate direction to move off fddi and general maintenance.
Backout: remove the patches and NIC entry
shutdown the server
change the DNS back to the original entry
restart the server
Contact(s):  Malcolm Wells

SITARA:    SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY:    SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:
Impact:  Unify Power
Time: Fri 4/13 at 5:00pm CST until Sat. 4/14 9:00am CST

Description: Unify Power database migration cut-over preparation activities.
Purpose: To prepare for next weekend's (4/20- 4/22) production migration of
Unify Power to MS SQL Server.
Technical Desc: Unify is undergoing a database migration for Power database
to provide a more stable environment.

Total Disruption of Service

Contact(s):
Regan Smith 713-853-9291
Brian Ripley 713-345-4709
Ramesh Rao 713-345-4207

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
        FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center

Specific Help:
Information Risk Management   (713) 853-5536
SAP/ISC
        (713) 345-4727
Unify On-Call      (713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call     (713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS   (713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP    (713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR      (713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support      (713) 327-3893  [Pager]
EES Help Desk     (713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797


Start Date: 4/23/01; HourAhead hour: 12;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042312.txt


do you guys think this is worthwhile? i think it might be interesting to see what others are doing. $75k rick

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Robert Young <RYoung@erisk.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Robert+20Young+20+3CRYoung+40erisk+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, June 28, 2001 2:47 PM
Cc:	Jim Rich; Curtis Tange; Robert Young; Peter Nakada; Kerry Williams; James Lam; Duncan Martin; Jason Kofman
Subject:	Risk Management benchmarking survey

Based on recent discussions with several energy firms, there appears to be
interest in conducting a survey which
*	summarizes the current state of risk management best practices
within the industry, and
*	provides benchmark data addressing current levels of risk based
performance for various energy related lines of business

To respond to this interest, we would like to conduct a survey which
addresses these goals. We have prepared a proposal which outlines our
approach for conducting a survey, and provides samples of expected output. I
will be in touch sometime next week to discuss the proposal with you, and
determine your interest in participating.

I look forward to speaking with you, and potentially working with you as a
participant in this project.

 <<Benchmark_Sales_Presentation_v2.ppt>>

Thank You

Bob Young

 - Benchmark_Sales_Presentation_v2.ppt