If Celeste and I are back in town by the superbowl, we will be there.

___________________________________________________________
Val Generes
eCommerce Technology Consultant
Houston 83/75984, 713-837-5984

            "Bass, Eric"
            <Eric.Bass@enron.com>        To:     "Baumbach, David" <David.Baumbach@enron.com>, "Jeganathan,
                                         Lenine" <Lenine.Jeganathan@enron.com>, "Olsen, Michael"
            01/28/2002 09:44 AM          <Michael.Olsen@enron.com>, "Lenhart, Matthew"
                                         <Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com>, "Blanchard, Timothy"
                                         <Timothy.Blanchard@enron.com>, "Winfree, O'Neal D."
                                         <O'Neal.D.Winfree@enron.com>, "Ryder, Patrick" <Patrick.Ryder@enron.com>,
                                         "Love, Phillip M." <Phillip.M.Love@enron.com>, <mballases@hotmail.com>,
                                         Kevin A. Boone/Internal/Accenture@Accenture, Val
                                         Generes/Internal/Accenture@Accenture
                                         cc:     "Husser, Shanna" <Shanna.Husser@enron.com>
                                         Subject:     Super Bowl Party - 2/3/02

I was thinking of having a get together at my place but I wanted to gauge
interest first.  Let me know if you are interested.  I will send out
another e-mail if I get enough responses.

-Eric

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************

This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.  If you have
received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the
original.  Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.


Kevin,

I hope that you find this information timely.  The staff of power traders here
look forward to working with you all soon.

Thanks,

Perry

(See attached file: OPMC_Power_Marketing_Personnel.xls)

 - OPMC_Power_Marketing_Personnel.xls


Can we do it tomorrow when Theresa is back in the office?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Frank, Carole
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 2:41 PM
To:	Lucci, Paul T.
Subject:	RE:

Thanks.  That Kennedy Oil deal still needs to be in Sitara b/c it is causing an imbalance in my positions.  If the deal is in Tagg, it needs to be in Sitara. Does that make sense?  Let me know.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lucci, Paul T.
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 3:38 PM
To:	Frank, Carole
Subject:	RE:

No don't worry about shoving work off on us.  And we will work through the Kennedy Oil deal later.  It doesn't start until Dec.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Frank, Carole
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 2:29 PM
To:	Lucci, Paul T.
Subject:	RE:

O.k.  Not trying to shove off work on you guys!  Also, there was that Kennedy Oil (Glenrock) deal done last week.  We still do not have a Sitara # for that deal. Any news on that?

Carole

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lucci, Paul T.
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 3:26 PM
To:	Frank, Carole
Subject:	RE:

No we can do it up here.  Thanks again for all your help!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Frank, Carole
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 2:25 PM
To:	Lucci, Paul T.
Subject:	RE:

Quick question...in regards to this EJW Family deal that I just received across the fax....there is a note that says "Please enter 92 mmbtu/day @ GDP-CIG/RKYMTN.  Do I need to enter this as an additional deal?   Let me know.  I need to book this deal before 4 p.m.  Thank you!

Carole

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lucci, Paul T.
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 3:22 PM
To:	Frank, Carole
Subject:	RE:

Sure get back to me when you can.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Frank, Carole
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 2:10 PM
To:	Lucci, Paul T.
Subject:	RE:

Paul,

I will definitely do some more investigative work on this.  I need to load our curves right now.  Can I get back to you about this tomorrow?  I am pretty swamped today.  Thanks.

Carole

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lucci, Paul T.
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 2:53 PM
To:	Frank, Carole
Subject:

Please look these over to see if these are all the fixed price financial deals Sinclair has with us.

Thanks
Paul

 << File: Sinclair Recon.xls >>


Julie,

Please review deal 133010.  The deal shows evergreen, but nothing rolled to
September.

D
---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 09/13/2000
11:30 AM ---------------------------
Aimee Lannou   09/13/2000 11:01 AM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Meter 6879 - Sept. 00

Daren - can you get a deal set up for meter 6879 for Sept. 00?  There is flow
for day 1, it is a 16 day chart.  In Aug. there was a deal of 176 on deal #
133010 for Heatherloch Municipal Utility.  Please let me know if enter a
deal.  Thanks.

AL


We have received written approval from both the OCD and the NMED for the soil
characterization plan that was submitted for sampling soil in the former
surface impoundment area located at the northeast corner of the facility. A
work plan for excavation and disposal of affected soil will be prepared
subsequent to completion of the soil characterization plan. A tentative
schedule is as follows:
? Meet with the Team and the contractor (Gandy) at the site on August 29th
? Collect soil samples for characterization on September 5th and 6th. Bill
Olson with the OCD has indicated that he would like to be present for these
activities.
? Receive lab results by September 21st
? Submit excavation work plan by October 5th

Whether or not we can complete the excavation work this year will be largely
dependent upon obtaining a quick approval of an excavation work plan. The
timing will be tight but it can be done.

George C. Robinson, PE
Contract Environmental Engineer
Cypress Engineering
ENRON Office: (713) 646-7327
ENRON email: george.robinson@enron.com


Pat:

Recently, I talked with you about ordering another filing unit.  It turns out
that we need 2 more filing units.  Please order them the same size as the
floor to ceiling cabinet we have.  Have the inside of the cabinets configured
as follows:

1 Cabinet should have 5 shelves
1 Cabinet should have 6 shelves

When Interstore was here today reconfiguing 2 of our existing cabinets, they
removed 8 shelves that they are going to use on these new units.

Please price these 2 new units and charge them to Co. # 0413, RC # 107043.
Please let me the prices and approximate delivery date.  Also, let me  know
if you need anything else.  Thanks.  Anita


Please take a few minutes to select your reviewers for the mid-year
performance review process and enter them in the Performance Management
System so that we can move this process along.

Thanks!

Mark


REAALLY?? I see how it is.  Smell a free dinner and all of a sudden ya wanna
hang out


Hey, Ken.  Wouldn't this be great?  It's a little hard to read, but that's
the way I got it.

D
---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 12/12/2000
10:34 AM ---------------------------

David Heineke <dheineke@corustuscaloosa.com> on 12/12/2000 10:07:39 AM
To: Jim Wallis <jwallis@corustuscaloosa.com>, John Foster
<jfoster@corustuscaloosa.com>, "'dfarmer@ECT.ENRON.com'"
<dfarmer@ECT.ENRON.com>, "'djones1969@yahoo.com'" <djones1969@yahoo.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: HOW TO SETTLE THE ELECTION

I second the motion.

-----Original Message-----
From: GRIFFIN, BARBARA [SMTP:GRIFFIN@LONESTARSTEEL.com]
<mailto:[SMTP:GRIFFIN@LONESTARSTEEL.com]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 8:13 AM
To: ALAN ALVESTAD (E-mail); Dheineke@tsteel <mailto:Dheineke@tsteel> .
COM Dheineke@tsteel <mailto:Dheineke@tsteel> . COM Heineke (E-mail); DREW
KEEFE (E-mail); Dustin Paul Easley (E-mail); EDDIE FERGUSON (E-mail); Kim
Howry (E-mail); lvan_johnson@hotmail <mailto:lvan_johnson@hotmail> . com
lvan_johnson@hotmail <mailto:lvan_johnson@hotmail> . com com (E-mail);
NealS@Hump <mailto:NealS@Hump> . com NealS@Hump <mailto:NealS@Hump> . com
com (E-mail); Raymond Parker (E-mail); TEaker1065@aol
<mailto:TEaker1065@aol> . com TEaker1065@aol <mailto:TEaker1065@aol> . com
com (E-mail)
Subject: FW: HOW TO SETTLE THE ELECTION

-----Original Message-----
From: Portia Gordon [mailto:PGordon@SFASU.EDU]
<mailto:[mailto:PGordon@SFASU.EDU]>
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 1:28 AM
To: GRIFFIN@lonestarsteel.com <mailto:GRIFFIN@lonestarsteel.com>
Cc: macpres@ballistic.com <mailto:macpres@ballistic.com>
Subject: Fw: HOW TO SETTLE THE ELECTION

 >Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 20:32:53 -0600
 >From: Jack Gordon <Jack@odsy.net <mailto:Jack@odsy.net> >
 >Subject: Fw: HOW TO SETTLE THE ELECTION
 >To: Paul Jones <pauldjones1@juno.com
<mailto:pauldjones1@juno.com> >, Portia Gordon <pgordon@sfasu.edu
<mailto:pgordon@sfasu.edu> >,
 > Randy Gordon <randy_gordon40@yahoo.com
<mailto:randy_gordon40@yahoo.com> >, James Peel <praycc@aol.com
<mailto:praycc@aol.com> >

  >>>
  >>> Subject: HOW TO SETTLE THE ELECTION
  >>>
  >>>
   >>> > JUST A FUNNY LITTLE EMAIL I THOUGHT I WOULD
PASS ON TO
   >>> > YOU...(hope it gives you a laugh)>
   >>> >
   >>> > How to settle the 2000 Presidential Election:
   >>> >
   >>> > Ok, Folks.  I've given the people in Florida
plenty of
   >>> > time to get this election finished.  Now It is
my
   >>> > turn:
   >>> >
   >>> > #1:  Al Gore becomes President of the United
States
   >>> > (all 49  states).
   >>> >
   >>> > #2:  George W. Bush becomes the President of
the
   >>> > Republic of Texas.  Gore shouldn't mind as he
said we
   >>> > were the worst state in the union during the
campaign.
   >>> >
   >>> >
   >>> > So what does Texas have to survive as a
Republic?
   >>> >
   >>> > --NASA in Houston, Texas (we will control the
space
   >>> > industry).
   >>> > --We refine over 85% of the gasoline in the
United
   >>> > States (that is why Houston has problems with
the air
   >>> > quality).
   >>> > --Defense Industry (we have over 65% of it).
The term
   >>> > "Don't mess with Texas", will take on new
meaning.
   >>> > --Oil - we can supply all the oil the Republic
of
   >>> > Texas will need for the next 300 years.
   >>> > --Natural Gas-Again we have all we need (too
bad about
   >>> > those northern states).  Al Gore will figure a
way to
   >>> > keep Tipper and you warm....
   >>> > --Computer Industry-we currently lead the
nation in
   >>> > producing computer chips.  A small place named
Texas
   >>> > Industries, Dell Computer, EDS, etc., etc.
   >>> > --Health Centers-We have the largest research
centers
   >>> > for Cancer research, the best burn centers,
and other
   >>> > large health planning centers.
   >>> > --We have enough colleges to keep us going:
Texas A&M,
   >>> > UT, Rice, University of Houston, SMU, Baylor,
UNT,
   >>> > Texas Women's University, etc.
   >>> > --We have a ready supply of workers (just open
the
   >>> > border when we need some more) and our friends
across
   >>> > the border will pour in by the thousands.
   >>> > --We have control of the paper industry,
plastics,
   >>> > insurance, etc.
   >>> >
   >>> > This just names a few of the items that will
keep the
   >>> > Republic of Texas afloat.
   >>> >
   >>> > Now to the rest of the United States under
President
   >>> > Gore:
   >>> >
   >>> > --Since you won't have the refineries to get
gas for
   >>> > your cars, only President Gore will be able to
drive
   >>> > around in his SUV which gets him about 9 miles
per
   >>> > gallon.  The rest of the United States will
have to
   >>> > walk or ride bikes.
   >>> > --You won't have any TV as the space center in
Houston
   >>> > will cut off your communications.
   >>> > --You won't have any natural gas to heat your
homes
   >>> > but since Al's promised global warming, I'm
sure you
   >>> > won't get cold!
   >>> > --You won't need our computer chips since you
won't
   >>> > have electricity to power the computers.
   >>> >
   >>> > So don't worry about us down here in Texas.
We will
   >>> > be OK!
   >>> >
   >>> >
  >>>
 >


Vince:
Here is the document sent by Ryan today. I did not have the chance to look at
it yet.
Paulo Issler
---------------------- Forwarded by Paulo Issler/HOU/ECT on 04/12/2000 04:19
PM ---------------------------

Ryan Siurek@ENRON
04/12/2000 10:05 AM
To: Paulo Issler/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Draft Analysis

fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Ryan Siurek/Corp/Enron on 04/12/2000
10:05 AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital Management

	From:  Trushar Patel                           04/11/2000 09:49 AM

To: Ryan Siurek/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Draft Analysis

---------------------- Forwarded by Trushar Patel/Corp/Enron on 04/11/2000
09:49 AM ---------------------------

ian.c.dsouza@us.pwcglobal.com on 04/04/2000 01:42:34 PM
To: Trushar.Patel@enron.com
cc: steven.j.stampf@us.pwcglobal.com, timothy.luehrman@us.pwcglobal.com

Subject: Re: Draft Analysis

Hi Trushar

Please find attached our draft analysis.  It is still very preliminary as we
have not been provided the latest version of legal documents and so the
analysis
reflects our understanding of the economics of the transaction as outlined to
us
based on discussions with Enron and available prior draft documentation..

The analysis uses the Enron share price as of March 28, 2000 ($72.81) and
assumes the LJM2 distribution is based on $30m or 25% IRR.  We anticipated
that
this might reach 30% IRR based on Enron discussions with LJM2.

Please call Steve Stampf's phone number for tomorrow's conference call at
9.30am
our time on 212 597 3162.

Regards

(See attached file: Raptor v5.ppt)
----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which
it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material.  Any
review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action
in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient is prohibited.   If you received this in error, please
contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

 - Raptor v5.ppt


cgerman1682
clg04apr


Here is a new ISDA request for Synergy Oil & Gas, Inc. If you have any
questions, please feel free to call.

Thanks,

Brad
ext. 5-7749


Mark,

Pursuant to your conversation yesterday with Mathis Conner, attached for your
review and comment please find an initial draft of the NDA between Level 3
and Enron Net Works.  Please call Leslie Hansen, Enron in-house counsel, at
713-853-6121 if you have any questions or comments concerning the NDA.

Please call Mathis at 713-345-8990 or myself at 713-345-3382 if you need to
discuss any additional matters further.

Best regards,

Peter Feltman

Peter Feltman
Director
E-Market Services
Enron Net Works LLC
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas 77002

T: 713-345-4482
X: 713-646-8583
C: 713-594-4009


Western law enforcement authorities are uncertain as to the form of possible follow-up terrorist attacks by bin Ladin, but much concern continues to be focused on the threat to infrastructure targets, and particularly nuclear power stations.  US and Canadian authorities have stepped up security considerably, but neither plant security nor plant structures were designed to withstand a strike by a large airliner.  UK law enforcement officials privately object to the UK government's position that Irish terrorists still represent a greater threat to power stations and gas terminals than do other international terrorists, and are maintaining a higher level of security than that dictated by the government.  New security measures will increase costs for nuclear operators and fuel the debate on nuclear power.

An FBI contact has informed us that law enforcement authorities do not know what to expect in the form of follow-up terrorist attacks.  He believes that bin Ladin would use different elements within his organization and a different modus operandi, making it difficult to foresee and prevent such attacks.  Training at bin Ladin camps is known to include attacks on infrastructure targets, such as power stations.  Much of the focus among Western authorities has been on the threat to national energy assets, and particularly nuclear power plants.  Although nuclear plants are among the most hardened structures constructed and are generally designed to withstand extreme natural events (eg, earthquakes and tornadoes), attacks by large aircraft were never considered in the design process.  The traditional security approach at these plants is consequently inadequate.

Response to this perceived threat has varied from country to country:

The security posture of US nuclear plants has been elevated to the highest level since immediately after the attacks.  This has involved increased patrols, augmented forces, heightened coordination among relevant authorities, and limited access to installations -- all representing little defense against a fully fueled airliner.

Nuclear regulatory authorities in both Canada and the US are working with intellience and law enforcement authorities to review existing procedures and are seeking to identify measures to address the expanded threat.  Authorities have established a secure air space around nuclear facilities.  Security at major hydroelectric sites and oil fields has also been tightened to protect against attacks which could strike a major blow to the US and Canadian economies.  New security measures are certain to increase costs for nuclear operators, and fuel the debate on the economics and safety of nuclear power.

Meanwhile, the assessed threat to power plants in the UK has been reduced to relatively low levels after briefly being stepped up.  An MI5 contact informed us privately that the government has adopted the official line that Irish groups currently pose a greater threat to UK power stations and gas terminals than do other international terrorist groups.  London Metropolitan Police and Scotland Yard officials have informed us that they object to this position by the government, and are in fact maintaining a higher level security posture than dictated by the government.  Local law enforcement officials have identified 180 "Key Economic Points" in the London area that require close monitoring, including public transportation, water supply, telecommunications, electricity and gas facilities.  MI5 has primary responsibility for protecting similar key points outside of London.


Notice No. 01-189
June 7, 2001

TO:
ALL NYMEX/COMEX DIVISION MEMBERS
ALL MEMBER FIRMS
ALL CLEARING MEMBERS

FROM:
NEAL WOLKOFF

RE:
POSITION ADJUSTMENT DEADLINES FOR THE JULY 2001 METAL AND ENERGY CONTRACTS
[NYMEX RULE 9.04(P) AND COMEX RULE 4.37(A)]

______________________________________________________________________________

 As a reminder, position adjustments for both NYMEX and COMEX Division metals
contracts are prohibited beginning on the tenth business day prior to the
first business day of the delivery month, and throughout the delivery month.
Therefore, all position adjustments of concurrent futures positions for the
July 2001 metals contracts must be completed prior to June 18, 2001.

 Additionally, position adjustments of concurrent futures positions for NYMEX
energy contracts are not permitted during the last three trading days of the
respective contracts.  Rules 9.04(P) and 4.37(A) are attached.

 If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Nick Galati
at (212) 299-2920, Nick Falcone at (212) 299-2919, or Bonnie Yurga at (212)
299-2879.

NYMEX RULE 9.04 - CLEARING PROCEDURE

(P) Concurrent Futures Positions

(1) Concurrent long and short positions in the current delivery month may not
be offset by netting, transfer, expit, adjustment or any other bookkeeping
procedures, but each side must be offset by normal floor transactions in
accordance with Exchange Rules. Provided, however, that a clearing member
will be exempt from this requirement if: (I) one side of the concurrent
position is established the business day prior to the date that the offset
memoranda are filed with the Clearing House; (II) a clearing member filing
such offset memoranda can satisfy the Exchange at its request that the delay
in effecting the offset is attributed to an error in the filing of its
clearing sheets; and (III) by 10:30 a.m. on the same date that a clearing
member files such offset memoranda, the clearing member also files with the
clearing house an updated and accurate Long Open Interest Report.

(2) For the purposes of this Rule 9.04(P), the current delivery month for
energy futures contracts commences on the open of trading on the third
business day, prior to termination of the respective futures contract,
including the termination date. The current delivery month in platinum and
palladium commences on the tenth (10th) business day prior to the first
business day of the delivery month.

COMEX RULE 4.37A - CONCURRENT FUTURES POSITIONS

(1) Concurrent long and short positions in the current delivery month may not
be offset by netting, transfer, expit, adjustment or any other bookkeeping
procedures, but each side must be offset by normal floor transactions in
accordance with Exchange Rules. Provided, however, that a clearing member
will be exempt from this requirement if one side of the concurrent position
is established the business day prior to the date that the open positions are
filed with the Clearing House.

(2) For the purposes of this Rule 4.37A, the current delivery month for
metals futures contracts commences on the open of trading on the tenth (10th)
business day, prior to the first business day of the delivery month.
The current delivery month for Eurotop futures commences on the open of
trading on the tenth (10th) business day prior to the termination of the
respective futures contract, including the termination date.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=mark.taylor@enron.com&refd
oc=(01-189)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


The EES VaR for today is $17.9 million, up from $16.9 million yesterday, due
to the additional short positions added to the Power West portfolio.  The VaR
should decrease once the short positions related to the University of
California facilities are removed.


---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 09/06/2000 06:59
PM ---------------------------

"Zerilli, Frank" <fzerilli@POWERMERCHANTS.COM> on 09/06/2000 06:46:47 AM
To: "'jarnold@enron.com'" <jarnold@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: concord Crash

 concord

 - concord.jpg


how about them tigers?  6 wins with 2 games to go.  let me know when you want
to pay off that bet.


Start Date: 2/4/02; HourAhead hour: 5;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002020405.txt


If I don't get a response by noon today, I plan on calling Calvin.

From:	James D Steffes/ENRON@enronXgate on 08/20/2001 08:15 AM
To:	Diann Huddleson/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject:	RE: Reinstatement of Credit Balances

Diann --

What's the next step?

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Huddleson, Diann
Sent:	Friday, August 17, 2001 1:18 PM
To:	CFerguso@llgm.com
Cc:	Wanda C Curry; Steffes, James D.; Hughes, Evan
Subject:	Reinstatement of Credit Balances

---------------------- Forwarded by Diann Huddleson/HOU/EES on 08/17/2001 01:17 PM ---------------------------

Diann Huddleson
08/17/2001 01:09 PM
To:	cmy1@pge.com
cc:	maa6@pge.com, Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES
Subject:	Reinstatement of Credit Balances

Calvin,  per our discussion,  at the time we returned our commercial customers to utility service earlier this year,  all accounts had accrued credit balances.  PG&E transferred these credits off each account as they were setting them up for utility billing.

These same accounts are now being returned to direct access.  We began receiving the first DA bills from PG&E earlier this month, all with zero beginning balances.  Enron expects that all credit balances will be reinstated on the respective accounts before the next billing cycle.

Don't hesitate to contact me if you have any questions regarding this request.   Page me if you need to.  888.740.8480.

Thanks.

Diann Huddleson
Director, Services Group
713.853.0584

---------------------- Forwarded by Diann Huddleson/HOU/EES on 08/17/2001 01:17 PM ---------------------------

Diann Huddleson
08/17/2001 01:17 PM
To:	diane.romeyko@sce.com
cc:	Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES
Subject:	Reinstatement of Credit Balances

Diane,  as we discussed,  at the time we returned our commercial customers to utility service earlier this year,  all accounts had accrued credit balances.  SCE transferred these credits off each account as they were setting them up for utility billing.

These same accounts are now being returned to direct access.  We began receiving the first DA bills from SCE earlier this month, all with zero beginning balances.  Enron expects that all credit balances will be reinstated on the respective accounts before the next billing cycle.

Don't hesitate to contact me if you have any questions regarding this request.   Page me if you need to.  888.740.8480.

Thanks.

Diann Huddleson
Director, Services Group
713.853.0584

<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>
<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>


Kewel!!!


Oh my!!!!

How those chickens come home to  roost.

I hope you are doing OK. Fine  here.

We must do lunch  soon.......................

Ken


Attached is PIRA's latest "Electricity Daily Demand Forecast."

If you have any questions regarding the report's content, please contact
Morris Greenberg (email: morris@pira.com) or Victoria Watkins (email:
vwatkins@pira.com), at (212) 686-6808.

Contact John Graziano regarding PIRA report distribution and address changes
at (212) 686-6808, email: support@pira.com.

NOTE: Circulation of the "Electricity Daily Demand Forecast" outside a
Client's licensed distribution area is strictly prohibited. Clients that are
unsure of their licensed distribution or require an extension of their
current license should contact their PIRA sales representative, or email to
sales@pira.com.

PIRA Energy Group

 - ed050901.pdf
 - ed050901.xls


>Sender: articles-email@ms1.lga2.nytimes.com
>Reply-To: judgergm@swbell.com
>From: judgergm@swbell.com
>To: klarnold@flash.net
>Subject: NYTimes.com Article: Suspended Rabbi Quits Seminary Presidency
>Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 00:02:21 -0500 (EST)
>
>This article from NYTimes.com
>has been sent to you by Bob Moss judgergm@swbell.com.
>
>Karen
>
>
>
>Bob Moss
>judgergm@swbell.com
>
>/-------------------- advertisement -----------------------\
>
>
>LOOKING FOR A TRULY HIGH-SPEED INTERNET EXPERIENCE?Then visit Alcatel.com
>and see what makes us theeworld's leading supplier of DSL
>solutions..Alcatel, world leader in DSL
>solutions..http://www.nytimes.com/ads/email/alcatel/index.html
>
>\----------------------------------------------------------/
>
>Suspended Rabbi Quits Seminary Presidency
>http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/07/national/07RABB.html
>
>December 7, 2000
>
>By GUSTAV NIEBUHR
>
>Rabbi Sheldon Zimmerman, a leading figure in Judaism's Reform
>movement as president of its seminary, has resigned from his job
>after being suspended by the movement's rabbinic organization for
>having entered into "personal relationships" in the past that the
>organization said violated its ethical code.
>
> Rabbi Zimmerman, president of Hebrew Union College-Jewish
>Institute of Learning, where he had been considered a charismatic
>and innovative leader, quit that post on Monday, after the Central
>Conference of American Rabbis suspended his rabbinical functions
>for at least two years, college and conference officials said.
>
> In a statement, the college said the suspension followed an
>investigation by the conference into "personal relationships" of
>Rabbi Zimmerman, which it did not specify other than to say that
>they predated his appointment as president in January 1996. Rabbi
>Zimmerman was the seventh president of the college, which was
>founded in 1875.
>
> Rabbi Paul J. Menitoff, the conference's executive vice president,
>said its board approved the penalty on Monday, based on a
>recommendation by its ethics committee, which looks into complaints
>about the conference's 1,700 members.
>
> Rabbi Menitoff said that conference rules prevented him from
>discussing the case but that the board decided Rabbi Zimmerman had
>violated a part of the ethics code, paragraph 2A, which deals with
>sexual conduct.
>
> It is included in the section of the code on "personal
>responsibility," which covers such matters as family life, personal
>honesty and finances. It calls on rabbis "to be scrupulous in
>avoiding even the appearance of sexual misconduct, whether by
>taking advantage of our position with those weaker than ourselves
>or dependent on us or succumbing to the temptations of willing
>adults."
>
> Hebrew Union, which trains men and women as rabbis and cantors and
>in other graduate and professional fields, has 1,500 students on
>campuses in Cincinnati, Los Angeles, New York and Jerusalem. Before
>becoming president, Rabbi Zimmerman, 58, was senior rabbi of Temple
>Emanu-El in Dallas from 1985 to 1995, and senior rabbi at Central
>Synagogue in New York, from 1972 to 1985. He is married and has
>four children. From 1993 to 1995, he was also the conference's
>president.
>
> Rabbi Zimmerman's resignation was first reported yesterday in The
>Cincinnati Enquirer and The Dallas Morning News.
>
> Efforts to reach him through the college and its officials were
>unsuccessful. The college said it appointed its provost, Norman
>Cohen, as acting president and would search for a permanent
>replacement.
>
> Rabbi Menitoff said the conference followed "the same process that
>we'd follow with any rabbi in the conference in similar
>circumstances." He said complaints against a rabbi are referred to
>and investigated by the ethics committee. Depending on that
>committee's findings, the conference may dismiss the complaint,
>privately reprimand or publicly censure a rabbi or suspendn or
>expel a rabbi.
>
> Rabbi Menitoff said the decision to suspend Rabbi Zimmerman was
>"very difficult and painful for everyone involved."
>
> Rabbi Eric H. Yoffie, president of the Union of American Hebrew
>Congregations, the Reform movement's synagogue organization, said
>Rabbi Zimmerman did not contest the findings or the judgment
>against him but responded to the decision "with great dignity."
>
> Rabbi Yoffie said that during his tenure as president, Rabbi
>Zimmerman added younger scholars to the faculty and expanded the
>college's Los Angeles branch so much that it will begin ordaining
>rabbis in 2002.
>
> Another member of the conference, Rabbi A. James Rudin, emeritus
>director of interreligious affairs at the American Jewish
>Committee, said Rabbi Zimmerman's resignation was "a real loss" and
>"a shock to the movement."
>
> Hebrew Union's chairman, Burton Lehman, praised Rabbi Zimmerman as
>"a great, great leader." Mr. Lehman said that Rabbi Zimmerman's
>resignation would "have an impact" but that the college was strong.
>
> "Transitionally, we'll be fine," Mr. Lehman said. "We have a
>strong faculty that will carry this institution through this
>tribulation."
>
>
>
>
>The New York Times on the Web
>http://www.nytimes.com
>
>/-----------------------------------------------------------------\
>
>
>Visit NYTimes.com for complete access to the
>most authoritative news coverage on the Web,
>updated throughout the day.
>
>Become a member today! It's free!
>
>http://www.nytimes.com?eta
>
>
>\-----------------------------------------------------------------/
>
>HOW TO ADVERTISE
>---------------------------------
>For information on advertising in e-mail newsletters
>or other creative advertising opportunities with The
>New York Times on the Web, please contact Alyson
>Racer at alyson@nytimes.com or visit our online media
>kit at http://www.nytimes.com/adinfo
>
>For general information about NYTimes.com, write to
>help@nytimes.com.
>
>Copyright 2000 The New York Times Company


Scott,

Please stop by when you visit Houston.
Give me a few days' warning to set up a meeting.

Vince

Scott Wakefield <scottw@mathworks.com> on 08/09/2000 06:38:47 AM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: MATLAB at Enron

Hello Vince :

I'm the Territory Manager for the MathWorks, we develop MATLAB technical
software. We've recently developed tools well suited for Energy Trading
Industry.

Enron has used our products in the past, but all of those end-users have
left Enron.

Risk Management and Research groups at Southern Energy, TXU, Dynegy, El
Paso Energy, Koch, Calpine, Reliant and others have recently started using
our products in the following ways.

1. Create sophisticated option pricing models, risk analysis models, and
stress analysis models. Creating GUI front ends for the end-users.
2. Pull in Data from ODBC, Corba, and SAS databases to evaluate.
3. Visualize the results and quantify the solution.
4. Compile these models and distribute these applications to their
Traders, Analysists and Managers with no distribution costs.

Who should I contact at your company to discuss Enron's situation to see if
our can help Enron as it has with our other Energy customers?

Thank you for your time and help.
==================================
Scott Wakefield
The MathWorks, Inc.
Phone: (508) 647-7282
Fax: (508) 647-4275
E-mail: swakefield@mathworks.com
http://www.mathworks.com
==================================
MATLAB News Group:
news:comp.soft-sys.matlab
==================================
Visit the new MathWorks Store and buy MATLAB, Simulink
and all of our products online
http://www.mathworks.com/store/


Those are east trades and you probably don't have access to them.  I just
bundled west and east so you can ignore them.

   Kate Symes                01/30/2001 04:23 PM

To: Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Incorrect Counterparties

No, that's fine. But because of the new global standards, we're required to
produce and report all corrections made on west power deals each day. So I
was looking into these deals to get trader names, terms, etc., but 3 of them
wouldn't pull up. 507901, 506767, and 507900 don't seem to be in the system.
Are these the correct deal numbers? Let me know when you get a chance.

Thanks,
Kate

Rhonda L Denton
01/30/2001 11:56 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Incorrect Counterparties

Thank you.  I think if I send these emails, they eventually pick the correct
CP.  I hope you don't mind that I changed the deals myself.

   Kate Symes                01/30/2001 11:22 AM

To: Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Incorrect Counterparties

Thank you for the reminder, Rhonda. I'm going to send out another
announcement this afternoon to all our traders along with the daily
correction log. Hopefully this will incite everyone to pay more attention to
the counterparty names they choose.

Thanks again,
Kate

Rhonda L Denton
01/30/2001 09:14 AM
To: Joe Errigo/Corp/Enron@Enron, Geir Solberg/PDX/ECT@ECT, Juan
Hernandez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Leaf Harasin/PDX/ECT@ECT, Ryan
Slinger/PDX/ECT@ECT, David V Porter/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT

Subject: Incorrect Counterparties

I have changed the following deals b/c the selected CPs are incorrect.  Also,
please remember not to pick CPs in brackets as they are inactive.  Thank you
for your help.

507901 should be Allegheny Power, Transmission Business Unit
507842 should be Dynegy Power Marketing, Inc.
506767 should be NRG Power Marketing, Inc.
507900 should be PJM Interconnection LLC
506618 should beTransalta Energy Marketing (US) Inc.
506727 should beTransalta Energy Marketing (US) Inc.
506747 should beTransalta Energy Marketing (US) Inc.


<<Confirm modification oct 31_p.doc>>

Russell F. Hackmann, CFA
Lehman Brothers Corporate Equity Derivatives
(201) 524-2279 phone
(917) 596-2936 cell
rhackman@lehman.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the designated recipient(s) named above.  If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited.  This communication is for information purposes only and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or as a solicitation of an offer to buy any financial product, an official confirmation of any transaction, or as an official statement of Lehman Brothers.  Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free.  Therefore, we do not represent that this information is complete or accurate and it should not be relied upon as such.  All information is subject to change without notice.

 - Confirm modification oct 31_p.doc


Sheri,
We are going to NO for JazzFest at the end of April.  April 27th-29th to be
exact.  Let me know if you're going.
DG
---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 02/20/2001
03:07 PM ---------------------------

From:  Sheri Thomas
  02/20/2001 09:13 AM

To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, jennifer_lamprecht@oxy.com, Dawn C
Kenne/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: southwest.com weekly specials

Would you guys be in for an April b'day trip to New Orleans?  These flights
are dirt cheap.  Thought maybe just fly up late morning on a Sat and come
back Sun morning.  We need to move pretty quick though....

Sheri
---------------------- Forwarded by Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT on 02/20/2001 09:10
AM ---------------------------

"Southwest Airlines" <special-offers-help@mail.southwest.com> on 02/20/2001
03:24:40 AM
Please respond to "Southwest Airlines"
<special-offers-help@mail.southwest.com>
To: "Special Offers" <special-offers1@mail.southwest.com>
cc:
Subject: southwest.com weekly specials

Southwest Airlines e-mail update for
February 20, 2001

****************************************************************
Your Freedom to Travel This Week Includes

I. $30 Each Way Anniversary Specials
II. southwest.com Click 'n Save(R) Specials
III. Other Discount Fare Special Offers Including
 Las Vegas $99/$119 Each Way Extended!
IV. Click 'n Save Subscriber Information

*****Southwest $30 Each Way Anniversary Specials******

I. $30 Each Way for 30 Markets (limited time, only)

This week's 30th Anniversary Specials
(for the following markets, only) are:

Albany, NY
 $30 each way to/from Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD

Albuquerque, NM
 $30 each way to/from Phoenix, AZ

Austin, TX
 $30 each way to/from Corpus Christi, TX

Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
 $30 each way to/from Albany, NY
 $30 each way to/from Hartford, CT/Springfield, MA
 $30 each way to/from Long Island/Islip, NY

Birmingham, AL
 $30 each way to/from Louisville, KY

Boise, ID
 $30 each way to/from Salt Lake City, UT

Burbank, CA
 $30 each way to/from Oakland, CA

Chicago, IL  Midway
 $30 each way to/from Detroit, MI
 $30 each way to/from Indianapolis, IN

Corpus Christi, TX
 $30 each way to/from Austin, TX
 $30 each way to/from Houston, TX  Hobby

Dallas, TX  Love Field
 $30 each way to/from Oklahoma City, OK

Detroit, MI
 $30 each way to/from Chicago, IL  Midway

El Paso, TX
 $30 each way to/from Lubbock, TX

Harlingen/Rio Grande Valley, TX
 $30 each way to/from San Antonio, TX

Hartford, CT/Springfield, MA
 $30 each way to/from Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD

Houston, TX  Hobby
 $30 each way to/from Corpus Christi, TX
 $30 each way to/from New Orleans, LA

Indianapolis, IN
 $30 each way to/from Chicago, IL  Midway

Jacksonville, FL
 $30 each way to/from Tampa Bay, FL

Kansas City, MO
 $30 each way to/from Oklahoma City, OK

Las Vegas, NV
 $30 each way to/from San Diego, CA

Little Rock, AR
 $30 each way to/from Louisville, KY

Long Island/Islip, NY
 $30 each way to/from Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
 $30 each way to/from Providence, RI

Los Angeles, CA
 $30 each way to/from Tucson, AZ

Louisville, KY
 $30 each way to/from Birmingham, AL
 $30 each way to/from Little Rock, AR

Lubbock, TX
 $30 each way to/from El Paso, TX

New Orleans, LA
 $30 each way to/from Houston, TX  Hobby

Oakland, CA
 $30 each way to/from Burbank, CA
 $30 each way to/from Ontario, CA

Oklahoma City, OK
 $30 each way to/from Dallas, TX  Love Field
 $30 each way to/from Kansas City, MO

Omaha, NE
 $30 each way to/from St. Louis, MO

Ontario, CA
 $30 each way to/from Oakland, CA
 $30 each way to/from Sacramento, CA

Phoenix, AZ
 $30 each way to/from Albuquerque, NM

Portland, OR
 $30 each way to/from Reno/Tahoe, NV

Providence, RI
 $30 each way to/from Long Island/Islip, NY

Reno/Tahoe, NV
 $30 each way to/from Portland, OR
 $30 each way to/from Salt Lake City, UT

Sacramento, CA
 $30 each way to/from Ontario, CA

Salt Lake City, UT
 $30 each way to/from Boise, ID
 $30 each way to/from Reno/Tahoe, NV

San Antonio, TX
 $30 each way to/from Harlingen/Rio Grande Valley, TX

San Diego, CA
 $30 each way to/from Las Vegas, NV
 $30 each way to/from San Jose, CA

San Jose, CA
 $30 each way to/from San Diego, CA

Seattle, WA
 $30 each way to/from Spokane, WA

Spokane, WA
 $30 each way to/from Seattle, WA

St. Louis, MO
 $30 each way to/from Omaha, NE
 $30 each way to/from Tulsa, OK

Tampa Bay, FL
 $30 each way to/from Jacksonville, FL
 $30 each way to/from West Palm Beach, FL

Tucson, AZ
 $30 each way to/from Los Angeles, CA

Tulsa, OK
 $30 each way to/from St. Louis, MO

West Palm Beach, FL
 $30 each way to/from Tampa Bay, FL

For a limited time, we have extended the
number of markets from 5 to 30.
The 30 markets will change each week,
so, please keep checking back.

The following restrictions will apply:

*21-day advance purchase
*Fares are nonrefundable
*Travel March 13, 2001 through May 23, 2001.
*Purchase beginning February 20 through
 February 22, 2001, midnight Pacific Time.

Fares do not include a federal excise tax of $2.75
that will be imposed on each flight segment of your
itinerary. A flight segment is defined as a takeoff and
a landing. The fares listed do not include airport-assessed
passenger facility charges (PFCs) of up to $18 roundtrip.

Please visit our Reservations section to reserve the
Southwest Airlines 30th Anniversary Specials at
http://www.southwest.com/

******* southwest.com Click 'n Save Specials********
II. In addition to the 30 markets for the Anniversary
Special, we have included the traditional
southwest.com Click 'n Save Specials.

The following restrictions will apply:

*21-day advance purchase
*Fares are nonrefundable
*Travel March 13, 2001 through August 4, 2001,
 except for May 25 and 28, 2001
*Purchase beginning February 20 through
 February 22, 2001, midnight Pacific Time

Albany, NY
 $64 each way to/from Chicago, IL Midway
 $59 each way to/from Cleveland, OH

Albuquerque, NM
 $62 each way to/from Las Vegas, NV
 $40 each way to/from Lubbock, TX

Amarillo, TX
 $61 each way to/from Houston, TX Bush Intercontinental
 $61 each way to/from Houston, TX Hobby
 $61 each way to/from Oklahoma City, OK

Austin, TX
 $60 each way to/from El Paso, TX
 $43 each way to/from Lubbock, TX

Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
 $55 each way to/from Detroit, MI
 $34 each way to/from Manchester, NH
 $34 each way to/from Providence, RI

Birmingham, AL
 $60 each way to/from Cleveland, OH
 $45 each way to/from Tampa Bay, FL

Boise, ID
 $34 each way to/from Seattle/Tacoma, WA
 $34 each way to/from Spokane, WA

Buffalo, NY
 $64 each way to/from Nashville, TN
 $34 each way to/from Raleigh-Durham, NC

Burbank, CA
 $34 each way to/from Las Vegas, NV
 $34 each way to/from Phoenix, AZ

Chicago, IL Midway
 $64 each way to/from Albany, NY
 $66 each way to/from Hartford, CT/Springfield, MA
 $34 each way to/from Louisville, KY

Cleveland, OH
 $59 each way to/from Albany, NY
 $60 each way to/from Birmingham, AL
 $62 each way to/from Providence, RI

Columbus, OH
 $41 each way to/from Long Island/Islip, NY
 $62 each way to/from Tampa Bay, FL

Corpus Christi, TX
 $62 each way to/from Jackson, MS
 $40 each way to/from San Antonio, TX

Dallas, TX Love Field
 $59 each way to/from Harlingen/Rio Grande Valley, TX
 $36 each way to/from Little Rock, AR
 $36 each way to/from Midland/Odessa, TX

Detroit, MI
 $55 each way to/from Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
 $62 each way to/from Omaha, NE

El Paso, TX
 $60 each way to/from Austin, TX
 $73 each way to/from Los Angeles, CA

Ft. Lauderdale/Hollywood, FL
 $34 each way to/from Jacksonville, FL
 $34 each way to/from Orlando, FL

Harlingen/Rio Grande Valley, TX
 $59 each way to/from Dallas, TX Love Field
 $65 each way to/from Jackson, MS

Hartford, CT/Springfield, MA
 $66 each way to/from Chicago, IL Midway
 $49 each way to/from Raleigh-Durham, NC

Houston, TX Bush Intercontinental
 $61 each way to/from Amarillo, TX
 $54 each way to/from Little Rock, AR

Houston, TX Hobby
 $61 each way to/from Amarillo, TX
 $54 each way to/from Little Rock, AR
 $36 each way to/from San Antonio, TX

Indianapolis, IN
 $45 each way to/from Kansas City, MO
 $55 each way to/from Omaha, NE

Jackson, MS
 $62 each way to/from Corpus Christi, TX
 $65 each way to/from Harlingen/Rio Grande Valley, TX

Jacksonville, FL
 $34 each way to/from Ft. Lauderdale/Hollywood, FL
 $43 each way to/from New Orleans, LA
 $34 each way to/from West Palm Beach, FL

Kansas City, MO
 $45 each way to/from Indianapolis, IN
 $36 each way to/from Tulsa, OK

Las Vegas, NV
 $62 each way to/from Albuquerque, NM
 $34 each way to/from Burbank, CA

Little Rock, AR
 $36 each way to/from Dallas, TX Love Field
 $54 each way to/from Houston, TX Bush Intercontinental
 $54 each way to/from Houston, TX Hobby

Long Island/Islip, NY
 $41 each way to/from Columbus, OH
 $55 each way to/from Louisville, KY

Los Angeles, CA
 $73 each way to/from El Paso, TX
 $45 each way to/from Reno/Tahoe, NV

Louisville, KY
 $34 each way to/from Chicago, IL Midway
 $55 each way to/from Long Island/Islip, NY

Lubbock, TX
 $40 each way to/from Albuquerque, NM
 $43 each way to/from Austin, TX

Manchester, NH
 $34 each way to/from Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
 $68 each way to/from Nashville, TN

Midland/Odessa, TX
 $36 each way to/from Dallas, TX Love Field
 $57 each way to/from Tulsa, OK

Nashville, TN
 $64 each way to/from Buffalo, NY
 $68 each way to/from Manchester, NH
 $38 each way to/from New Orleans, LA

New Orleans, LA
 $43 each way to/from Jacksonville, FL
 $38 each way to/from Nashville, TN

Oakland, CA
 $44 each way to/from Portland, OR
 $49 each way to/from Salt Lake City, UT

Oklahoma City, OK
 $61 each way to/from Amarillo, TX
 $59 each way to/from San Antonio, TX

Omaha, NE
 $62 each way to/from Detroit, MI
 $55 each way to/from Indianapolis, IN

Ontario, CA
 $45 each way to/from Reno/Tahoe, NV
 $37 each way to/from San Jose, CA

Orlando, FL
 $34 each way to/from Ft. Lauderdale/Hollywood, FL
 $34 each way to/from West Palm Beach, FL

Phoenix, AZ
 $34 each way to/from Burbank, CA
 $34 each way to/from San Diego, CA

Portland, OR
 $44 each way to/from Oakland, CA
 $44 each way to/from San Jose, CA

Providence, RI
 $34 each way to/from Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
 $62 each way to/from Cleveland, OH

Raleigh-Durham, NC
 $34 each way to/from Buffalo, NY
 $49 each way to/from Hartford, CT/Springfield, MA

Reno/Tahoe, NV
 $45 each way to/from Los Angeles, CA
 $45 each way to/from Ontario, CA

Sacramento, CA
 $54 each way to/from Spokane, WA
 $70 each way to/from Tucson, AZ

Salt Lake City, UT
 $49 each way to/from Oakland, CA
 $56 each way to/from Seattle/Tacoma, WA

San Antonio, TX
 $40 each way to/from Corpus Christi, TX
 $36 each way to/from Houston, TX Hobby
 $59 each way to/from Oklahoma City, OK

San Diego, CA
 $34 each way to/from Phoenix, AZ
 $34 each way to/from Tucson, AZ

San Jose, CA
 $37 each way to/from Ontario, CA
 $44 each way to/from Portland, OR

Seattle/Tacoma, WA
 $34 each way to/from Boise, ID
 $56 each way to/from Salt Lake City, UT

Spokane, WA
 $34 each way to/from Boise, ID
 $54 each way to/from Sacramento, CA

Tampa Bay, FL
 $45 each way to/from Birmingham, AL
 $62 each way to/from Columbus, OH

Tucson, AZ
 $70 each way to/from Sacramento, CA
 $34 each way to/from San Diego, CA

Tulsa, OK
 $36 each way to/from Kansas City, MO
 $57 each way to/from Midland/Odessa, TX

West Palm Beach, FL
 $34 each way to/from Jacksonville, FL
 $34 each way to/from Orlando, FL

Fares do not include a federal excise tax of $2.75
that will be imposed on each flight segment of your
itinerary. A flight segment is defined as a takeoff and
a landing. The fares listed do not include airport-assessed
passenger facility charges (PFCs) of up to $18 roundtrip.

Please visit our Reservations section to reserve this
week's Click 'n Save Specials at
http://www.southwest.com/

*Scroll down to the Additional Information section for
more details or visit:
http://www.southwest.com/hotfares/hotfares.html

******** This is the Additional Information section********
Additional Information You Need to Know About All
of Our Sales:

*Changes to any portion of the reservation
 (flight, dates, cities, and/or names of passengers),
 once purchased, will result in the cancellation of
 the ENTIRE reservation and rebooking at the lowest
 fare available which could result in a fare increase.

*Southwest specials are nonchangeable
 and nonrefundable.
*Ticketless Travel Online may only be purchased with
 a credit card. Customers holding funds from
 a previously unused trip on Southwest Airlines or Customers
 who have Southwest Airlines vouchers will not be able to use
 those forms of payment for Ticketless Travel Online.
*Unused funds may be applied toward future travel on
 Southwest Airlines within one year of the original purchase date.

*Seats are limited and won't be available on some
 flights that operate during very busy travel times
 and holiday periods, such as President's Day,
 Spring Break, and Easter.

*Standby travel requires an upgrade to the
 full unrestricted fare.

********* Other Special Offers from Southwest**********
III. Coast to Coast is back!  Travel on Tuesday,
Wednesday, or Saturday for only $99 each way.  Travel
on Monday, Thursday, Friday, or Sunday for only $119
each way.  For more details, please visit us at:
http://www.southwest.com/hotfares/feb2001_c2c.html

Also, we have 11 shorthaul markets to/from St. Louis
on sale for only $30 each way.  Please visit us, for
more information, at:
http://www.southwest.com/hotfares/feb2001_c2c.html

********************Friends Fly Free! ***********************
Providence, RI to/from Long Island/Islip, NY $49 Each Way
Take advantage of the special offer by selecting
available flights in the DISCOUNT FARES
column. Note: You must select an even number of
Passengers during the booking portion to get the
correct pricing breakdown.  Friends Fly Free fare is not
combinable with other fares and ticketed passenger
and companion must fly together.  For more information,
please visit us at:
http://www.southwest.com/hotfares/feb2001_FFF.html

*******Las Vegas $99/$119 Each Way Extended!********
Purchase Las Vegas travel through March 15, 2001
Travel on Tuesday, Wednesday, or Saturday for only
$99 each way.  Travel on Monday, Thursday, Friday,
or Sunday for only $119 each way.
For details and additional information, visit us at:
http://www.southwest.com/hotfares/feb2001_LAS.html

****************** Subscriber Information *******************
IV.  Please pass this great news on to your friends!
To subscribe to Southwest Airlines
Click 'n Save E-mail Updates,
visit http://www.southwest.com/email/

Remember, if you change your Internet service provider,
you will need to unsubscribe and re-subscribe in order
to continue receiving Click 'n Save email updates.
Please visit our subscription page at:
http://www.southwest.com/email/
****************************************************************
This is a post only mailing from Southwest Airlines.
Please do not attempt to respond to this message.

Copyright 2001 Southwest Airlines Co. All Rights Reserved.

---
You are currently subscribed to special-offers1 as: [sthomas@enron.com]
To unsubscribe, send email to
leave-special-offers1-99521519R@mail.southwest.com
or unsubscribe anytime at http://www.southwest.com/email


Ajit--regarding the pending rate reduction petition that has been filed at
the Iowa Utilities Board (IUB) by the Office of the Consumer Advocate (OCA)
against Mid American.  We've been looking at the prudence of intervening and
being active in the case, based on your suggestion that if the rate reduction
of $77 million as requested were granted, we might benefit to the tune of
about $1.2 million on the current customers that we have behind Mid Am.

We are looking at a number of issues,  including the probability of success,
the prudence of us being on the witness stand if we provide testimony,  the
effect of the proposed rate design if a reduction is granted, going back to
the last case to see how much the OCA really won,etc.   The first testimony
will be filed in  mid June, and we should have a better idea then of what the
case is really going to look like.

One threshold question is whether there is any language  in our  contracts
for the customers  that prohibits us from representing their/our interests at
the IUB.  I am thinking that there probably is not, but want to make sure.
COuld you please forward to me and Harry a copy of each customers contract to
review?

Vicki/Elizabeth--wasn't sure who these contracts would fall under,  so Jim
suggested I send to you as well.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Taylor, Craig
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 10:58 AM
To:	Griffith, John; May, Larry; Zipper, Andy; Donohoe, Tom; Otto, Charles H.; Diamond, Daniel
Subject:	FW: ready for the next hunt

 - ATT00001.htm
 - rock103.com.afghanihunt.mp3


Sheila,

Here's the latest I have, but there may be another turn in the works.  I've
asked Pete to send it to you, along with the GE.  I need to do an override
letter to pick up the agency stuff as well.  I spoke with Lisa about that
yesterday.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/11/2001 08:59
AM ---------------------------

Alan Larsen@ECT
01/10/2001 04:45 PM
To: "Thompson, Peter J." <peterthompson@akllp.com> @ ENRON
cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: RE: Fountain Valley/ABB Facility Agreement

Peter--I'm attempting to get you a revised Exhibit A.  I'll confirm with Kay
whether we need Jody Pierce as designated recipient of invoices, or whether
we can have them sent to NEPCo so long as they go to Jody for payment.  There
is no comma before the LLC after E-Next Generation. Is there any other info
you need on the ABB breakout? We want to be able to execute it as soon as we
get you this info.  Thanks.
 Al Larsen

"Thompson, Peter J." <peterthompson@akllp.com> on 01/10/2001 08:56:43 AM
To: <Alan.Larsen@enron.com>
cc: "Kay Mann (E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>

Subject: RE: Fountain Valley/ABB Facility Agreement

These changes have been made.  To complete this agreement, we need (a) a
revised Exhibit A, (b)the response to the Don Hamond's question re.
Section 6.7.2 and (c) confirmation of whether it is "E-Next Generation,
L.L.C." or "E-Next Generation LLC".

-----Original Message-----
From: Alan.Larsen@enron.com [mailto:Alan.Larsen@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 7:17 PM
To: Thompson, Peter J.
Cc: Don.Hammond@enron.com; Jeff.G.Slaughter@enron.com;
Mark.Mullen@enron.com; Kay.Mann@enron.com
Subject: Re: Fountain Valley/ABB Facility Agreement

Here is the FVP-specific info for the ABB breakout contract.
---------------------- Forwarded by Alan Larsen/PDX/ECT on 01/09/2001
04:04
PM ---------------------------

 (Embedded      (Embedded image moved to file:
 image moved to pic31928.pcx)
 file:          Don Hammond
 pic05629.pcx)  (Embedded image moved to file:
                pic25423.pcx)
                01/09/2001 05:54:27 PM
                (Embedded image moved to file:
                pic28520.pcx)

To:   Alan Larsen/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:   Jeff G Slaughter/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mark Mullen/PDX/ECT@ECT, Bill
      Williams/PDX/ECT@ECT

Subject:  Re: Fountain Valley/ABB Facility Agreement  (Document link:
Alan
      Larsen)

Attached is an edited file for the ABB/Fountain Valley agreement. I have
removed and made revisions to several sections to make it specific to
the 3
units for Fountain Valley. Specific revisions include:

Exhibit B1
- Page 23, revise quantity from 6 to 3
- Pages 43 through 86, delete pages specific to other designs

As noted in the forwarded e-mail, the contact information in Sections
25.1
and 25.3 needs to be revised to replace Purchaser -
     |-----------------------------------|
     |                                   |
     | GE Packaged Power, Inc.           |
     | 2707 North Loop West              |
     | Houston, Texas  77008             |
     | Attn: Lee Johnson                 |
     | Fax: 713-869-8365                 |
     |                                   |
     |-----------------------------------|
     |                                   |
     | David Davis                       |
     | 16415 Jacinto Port Blvd.          |
     | Houston, Texas 77015              |
     | Fax: 281-452-1585                 |
     |                                   |
     |-----------------------------------|

Question in Section 6.7.2 on Address for invoices - Is NEPCO the
intended
location for invoices?

(See attached file: ABB Facility Agreement-edits.doc)


On March 14, 01, FERC issued an "Order removing obstacles to increased
electric generation and gas supply in the West.."  (Docket No. EL01-47).

 Most significantly, FERC authorizes industrials in WSCC to sell power to
licensed power marketers (like EPMI and EES) effective 3/14/01 through
12/31/01.  The industrial does not have to obtain its own power marketer
license from FERC (subject to EPMI and EES making filings for the
industrials).  (This is similar to the authorization that EPMI and EES
requested nationwide earlier this year -- we should hear from FERC on that
request by mid-May.)

In addition, FERC authorizes DSM sales at wholesale at market based rates.

Specifics:

Owners of generating facilities located at business locations in the WSCC and
used primarily for back-up for self-generation (who will be "public
utilities" subject to the Federal Power Act only while they sell at
wholesale) can sell power at wholesale from such facilities to non-affiliated
entities (like EPMI or EES) without prior notice under section 205 of FPA
(would usually require 60 day advance notice filing).
  -- Waives certain parts of the filing requirements for the industrial;
however, the industrial will still be subject to shortened filing
requirements for dispositions of facilities and interlocking positions while
they are selling at wholesale.
 -- EPMI and EES will make the FERC quarterly filings on behalf of the
industrials for any of these purchases.  Our report must show the names of
the industrial; aggregate amount of capacity and/or energy purchased from
each seller; and the aggregate compensation paid to each seller.
Accounting/commercial folks for EPMI and EES-- please make sure these
purchases are flagged in the accounting system, since the report will be
separate from our big quarterly reports.
 -- This does not authorize the retail industrial customer to violate any
rules or tariffs of its host utility.  This does not authorize an industrial
to resell power it purchases (only can sell what it generates); unless
otherwise allowed (or not precluded) by its retail tariff -- must file a rate
schedule at FERC for this, but FERC will be receptive to granting waivers and
authorizations.
 -- This authorization expires after 12/31/01.
Effective 3/14/01 through 12/31/01, retail customers in WSCC, as permitted by
state laws and regulations, and wholesale customers are authorized to reduce
consumption for the purpose of reselling their load reduction at wholesale at
market-based rates.  These transactions can occur in several ways:  An
aggregator can line up retail load to acquire enough negawatts to resell in a
manner similar to what aggregators do when they sell power to retail load
under retail choice programs.  In addition, wholesale and retail load with
contract demand service could resell their contract demands if the value of
power is greater than the value of consumption.  Similar quarterly reports
would be due by EPMI/EES.
NOTE:  the industrial still has to obtain the interconnection agreement with
transmission provider (may need new interconnection facilities, etc.)
Remember that you still need to get transmission on OASIS when the power is
wheeled away from the industrial.

Other initiatives in the order:

Utilities are encouraged to make DSM arrangements with wholesale customers.
FERC waives the prior notice requirement for amended contracts that are
required to be filed at FERC.
Clarifies that DSM should be treated consistenly with all other types of
incremental and out-of-pocket costs for utilities.
Reminds transmission providers to keep ATCs current, including CBM and TRM.
Provides incentive rates for new transmission projects that can be in service
by July 1 (and to a lesser extent -- by November 1 of 01 and 02).
Considers "rolled in" rates for generation interconnection (rather than
direct assignment that we have now.)
Extends temporary waivers through 12/31/01 of operating and efficiency
standards for QFs.  Allows QF to sell output above historical supply though a
negotiated bilateral agreement at market based rates, if sold in California
and the WSCC.
FERC will review interconnection issues that impede generation from reaching
load (ie, if a utility does not act within time limits on interconnection
requests, etc.)
Provides for increased staff and quicker gas pipeline additions review.

Please let me know if you would like the order.  Ray Alvarez (202-466-9170)
and I (713-853-7007) can assist you with this.  Thanks.


_______________________________________________________________

This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read,
copy, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the
sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system.
Thank you.
_______________________________________________________________

David: Here are my comments re the Agency Agreement draft sent last week:
(1) Section 1.27. I would suggest replacing "in Peoples' sole discretion"
with "in accordance with Sections 6.1 and 6.2". This is more consistent
with the intent re changes to the Operating Statement. (2) Section 2.4.
Each one of the new provisions re nominations, (a) 1,2, and 3, ends with a
similar sentence: "Peoples will confirm these requests as soon as
practicable prior to such nimination deadline and shall enter any
nominations necessary by such nomination deadline." Should this be more
specific, perhaps something like : "Peoples will confirm acceptance of
these requests as soon as practicable prior to the nomination deadlione and
shall schedule such nominations prior to the dealdine."? (The wording for
no. 3 is similar to 1 and 2.)   (3) Section 2.9 (ii) From a regulatory
perspective, I prefer the bracketed language. As I noted regarding the last
draft, a regulator would be concerned with an agreement commiting only to
"commercially reasonable efforts" re compliance with the GTC, or a Law or
Judgment. (4) Section 2.10. There is a typo in the second line from the
bottom of 8, it's "remains" unpaid, not "remain". (note that this concept
of a Peoples credit policy is consistent with Peoples' rights re denial of
serivice under Section 8.2 of the GTC, which allows Peoples to refuse
service based on a credit analysis.) (5) Section 5.1. At the time of the
last draft, we discussed an additional representation for Peoples that "it
has provided MEH with a copy of the G&TC in effect as of the Effective
Date". This could inserted in 5.1 as (d), with a relettering of current d
and e. (6) Section 7.2 I don't think the second to last sentence will work.
This says that, if Peoples rejects an offered Extended Hub Transactions or
doesn't timely accept, it can't enter into a similar transaction with the
party involved for 6 months. The problem with this is that Peoples must
provided Hub Service under the GTC, except when a ground for refusal stated
in Section 8.2 of the GTC applies. The circumstances described in 7.2 are
not a legitimate ground for refusal. I beleive, however, that we get to the
same place if 7.2 were modified to require that Peoples pay MEH its
percentage of Cumulative Net Revenues in the event that a transaction
similar to one previously rejected for the same party is accepted within 6
mos. after termination of the Agency Agreement.  (7) Section 8.3.  Item
(vi) of the list of functions could be expanded to state: "assisting in the
pareparation and filing of requests for Governmental Approval in accordance
with Section 10.1 and/or the preparation of FERC reports that are required
in the ordinary course of business and not specifically requested by FERC."
I wan't sure of the intent re the last phrase of this. Does this mean that
if a Report is specifically requested by FERC, MEH would be paid separetly
for work on the Report? I would have thought that routine review of
regulatory filings and work on reports might all fall into the category
covered by the $50,000 payment, regardless of whether a particular report
is requested. Please let me know if you have questions. Thanks


-----Original Message-----
From: Lichtenwalter, Blair
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 8:22 AM
To: Lokey, Teb; Kilmer III, Robert
Subject: FW: Quote for the day, #1,246.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Dillon [mailto:kdillon@admin4.hsc.uth.tmc.edu]
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 3:33 PM
To: LHammer@BR-Inc.com; Lichtenwalter, Blair; Phee@hal-pc.org; Cary M. Jones; Irsan Tisnabudi; J. Redford; Steve Ball; Paul Cooper; Irina Belmont; Cathy Wagner; Victoria S Briscoe; 'Jerry Fuller'; Edward R Fullerton; Juanita E Poole; Rives Taylor; Brian Yeoman; Rick Miller; Scott Merville; Brian Herod; Wesley Harrott; Maria E Hillman; Devin Longuet; Angela Hintzel; Loren Skinner; John Drew; Lou M.; Evans Attwell; pattesrm@bp.com; dredford@dogpc.com; Sharron Devere; Eileen Smith; Hammer; Donald R Woods; Brad Stuebing; George Bandy; Cary DuPuy; dmlink1936@yahoo.com; BhamrahT@USA.REDCROSS.ORG; dhick2@msn.com; Tommy L. Yates; Karla Stuebing; CeciNavarre@aol.com; Jillian Welch; Joel Rennie; Ward Brook; Russ Causey; John Kajander; Steve Shook; curryijc@BP.com; Mark Gregg; 'Carol Saxenian'; Joe Wolfe; Matthew; Pam Stewart; John Dorroh; Chris Seger; John Curry at home; Jeff Gray; Usnick Kirk G.; Howard Law; Katherine Easterling; Dan O. Olivarez; John Koskoski; Bill Seaman; Ms. Baxter; Rony Kahan; Greg Ford; John Koskoski; Scott Baxter; Howard Law; Blair Lichtenwalter; Dave Lineman; Joanne Galvin; Agnes Chan; Jerry Ellis; Charlie Hagedorn; Tad Mulder; Alan Parker; Alan Austin; T Lad & Kristin Webb; Adele T. Dillon 2; Tom Dillon; the links; David Link; Brother; Cindy A. Dillon; Donna Ervin; T. Lad and Kristin Webb; Flaum Morris; Howard Law; Charlie Chaffin
Subject: Quote for the day, #1,246.

"The ground war in Afghanistan hotted up yesterday when the Allies revealed plans to airdrop a platoon of crack French existentialist philosophers into the country to destroy the morale of Taleban zealots by proving the non-existence of God.

Elements from the feared Jean-Paul Sartre Brigade, or 'Black Berets', will be parachuted into the combat zones to spread doubt, despondency and existential anomie among the enemy. Hardened by numerous intellectual battles fought during their long occupation of Paris's Left Bank, their first action will be to establish a number of pavement cafes at strategic points near the front lines. There they will drink coffee and talk animatedly about the absurd nature of life and man's lonely isolation in the universe. They will be accompanied by a number of heartbreakingly beautiful girlfriends who will further spread dismay by sticking their tongues in the philosophers' ears every five minutes and looking remote and unattainable to everyone else.

Their leader, Colonel Marc-Ange Belmondo, spoke yesterday of his confidence in the success of their mission. Sorbonne graduate Belmondo, a very intense and unshaven young man in a black pullover, gesticulated wildly and said, 'The Taleban are caught in a logical fallacy of the most ridiculous. There is no God and I can prove it. Take your tongue out of my ear, Juliet, I am talking.' Marc-Ange plans to deliver an impassioned thesis on man's nauseating freedom of action with special reference to the work of Foucault and the films of Alfred Hitchcock.

However, humanitarian agencies have been quick to condemn the operation as inhumane, pointing out that the effects of passive smoking from the Frenchmen's endless Gitanes could wreak a terrible toll on civilians in the area.

Speculation was mounting last night that Britain may also contribute to the effort by dropping Professor Stephen Hawking into Afghanistan to propagate his non-deistic theory of the creation of the universe.

Other tactics to demonstrate the non-existence of God will include the dropping of leaflets pointing out the fact that Michael Jackson has a new album out and Oprah Winfrey has not died yet.

This is only one of several Psy-Ops operations mounted by the Allies to undermine the unswerving religious fanaticism that fuels the Taleban's fighting spirit. Pentagon sources have recently confirmed rumours that America has already sent in a 200-foot-tall robot Jesus, which roams the Taleban front lines glowing eerily and shooting flames out of its fingers while saying, 'I am the way, the truth and the life, follow me or die.' However, plans to have the giant Christ kick the crap out of a slightly effeminate 80-foot Mohammed in central Kabul were discarded as insensitive to Muslim allies."

Michael Kelly, British independent "blogger" (not the WaPo columnist / editor of the Atlantic), "French Intellectuals to be Deployed in Afghanistan To Convince Taleban of Non-Existence of God,"  <http://www.michaelkelly.fsnet.co.uk/exis.htm>, 3/7/02.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Allen, Diana
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 8:05 AM
To:	Black, Tamara Jae
Subject:	FW: NetCo Production Databases Reorg.

TJ.

Can you please let everyone know that our Power Decision Support database will be down today, and could possible stay down until tomorrow morning.

I will notify you as soon as the database comes on line again.

Thanks,

Diana Allen
X35356

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tang, Mable
Sent:	Wednesday, January 30, 2002 1:28 PM
To:	Allen, Diana; Poston, David; Luu, Duong; Lim, Francis S.; Krishnaswamy, Jayant; Chitradurga, Sundar; Powell, John D.; Ramesh, Ganapathy; Schomer, Chris; McKinney, Hal
Cc:	Wei, Zhiyong; Nat, Steve; Johnson, Jeff; Stock, Steve; Hillier, Bob; Berger, Michael; Charbonnet, Clement; Invedy, Tantra; Johnston, Jamey; Ritacco, Michael
Subject:	NetCo Production Databases Reorg.

Hello Everyone,

The Oracle DBA team would like request NetCo production database downtime starting tomorrow Thursday 01/31/2002 at
10am to perform database reorg.  This reorg is important to ensure efficient data access after the data cleansing effort.

Attached is the summary of the reorg work and the estimated downtime.  All NetCo production databases will be ready
no later than Friday 02/01/2002 at 7am if not earlier.

Please response with your approval by COB today.  If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me or your dbas.

Thanks,
Mable

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Charbonnet, Clement
Sent:	Wednesday, January 30, 2002 12:03 PM
To:	DL-Oracle DBA
Subject:	Database Reorg.

Attached is the spreadsheet of the database reorg sizes.

Clement


The attached schedule is for Wednesday, Jan 30.  Associated text files will be posted to Sparky today.

Michael R. Frazier
Manager
Load Forecasting Desk
Enron Energy Services
Office: 713-345-3200
Pager: 877-926-0615
P-mail: 8779260615@skytel.com


Have you heard about this?

DG
---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 07/31/2000
01:15 PM ---------------------------

Gabriel Monroy
07/28/2000 11:42 AM
To: Rahmaan Mwongozi/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Michael Benien/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Chris Abel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor
Guggenheim/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: FT Central

 The problem was solved and now we are picking up originations going to
Middle Market - Chicago.

Victor/ Darron
There is still a remaining difference of  771.00 dollars that IM Central
and/ or  Chicago have not recognized on their P&L.

Orig. Recognized on P&L
IM - Central     54,252.00
IM-Chicago    11,376.00
TOTAL            65,628.00

Originations stated on the Schedule.
Middle Market - Central         52,022.68
Middle Market - Chicago      14,376.00
TOTAL                                        66,398.68

DIFFERENCE    770.68

If you have any questions, please let me know.

Gabriel
3-6465

	From:  Rahmaan Mwongozi @ ENRON                           07/27/2000 09:07 PM

To: Gabriel Monroy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Benien/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Chris
Abel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Guggenheim/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FT Central

FT Central is showing a change from 7/26/00 MTD and 7/27/00's MTD resulting
in a net loss of ($14,400).  They are not, however showing this amount on
their daily or their scheduale.


We have reviewed the assignments Jean sent out earlier in the week.  At this time
	I think the split is OK.  I would like for you to put in writing for me the following:

	 	Who is your back up on critical reports, etc when you are out.
		I would like for that back up to be someone that was NOT on
		your original team.  This may help us address the issue of the two
		"old" teams merging.

		For example I am assuming if one rep has the shipper business and another rep has the
		operator business for the same company, then those two reps should back each other's
		desk.

		Randy Janzen is backing up Jean Adams desk on Lamar Power Plant since he has AEP which
			is shipper that does business at the Lamar Plant.

		Scott and Kathy support each other's desk since Kathy has ElPaso as a Shipper and
			Scott has ElPaso as Operator.

		Harry and Joe support each other on Oneok since Harry has Bushton and Joe has the
			gathering

		The areas of concern in relation to day to day business are below and need specific back up
		reps.

			GPM Monthly Pricing Report
			Lamar Power Plant True Ups
			PVR Report
			Oneok Gathering Reporting
			NNG Administrative Contracts
			SPS Power Plant True Up
			Conoco Power Plant True Up
			MOPS Daily Report

		The HIgh profile shippers/Operators that need specific back ups are as follows:

			Duke/GPM
			Oneok
			Transcanada
			Dynegy
			Reliant
			ElPaso
			West Texas Gas

	If there is any confusion with the email, please do not hesitate to call Terry or myself.  Thanks. Lynn


Esmeralda:

I'm available.

Thanks!

Marie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gonzalez, Esmeralda
Sent:	Wednesday, June 20, 2001 10:18 AM
To:	Heard, Marie; Boyd, Samantha
Subject:	Training and Files

Good morning ladies:

Mary asked that I coordinate a meeting with you regarding Training and Files.  Please let me know if you are available to meet with Mary tomorrow, Thursday, June 21, 2001 @ 9:30 a.m. for approximately 30 minutes.  Thanks.

Esmeralda Gonzalez
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB3815
Houston, Texas 77002
e-mail: esmeralda.gonzalez@enron.com
Phone: 713-345-7621
Fax: 713-646-3393


New VAC TRACKER.

P.S. This has no virus....

Daniel Quezada

<Embedded StdOleLink>
<Embedded Paintbrush Picture>


Attached is the monthly CERA analysis of markets, prices and supply.

---------------------- Forwarded by Lorna Brennan/ET&S/Enron on 08/16/2000
07:41 AM ---------------------------

webmaster@cera.com on 08/15/2000 10:48:57 PM
To: Lorna.Brennan@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Monthly Briefing: In a High Range - CERA Alert

**********************************************************************
CERA Alert: Sent Tue, August 15, 2000
**********************************************************************

Title: Monthly Briefing: In a High Range
Author: N. American Gas Team
E-Mail Category: Alert
Product Line: North American Gas ,
URL: http://www.cera.com/cfm/track/eprofile.cfm?u=5526&m=1314 ,

Alternative URL:
http://www.cera.com/client/nag/alt/081500_17/nag_alt_081500_17_ab.html

**********************************************************************

Gas prices remain within a high range, with prices volatile between
approximately $3.75 and $4.50 per million British thermal units (MMBtu).
Prices are likely to remain within this high band through the fall, until the
uncertainty of early winter weather resolves itself. At the lower end of this
range--and with oil prices in the upper $20s per barrel or higher--price
support kicks in as end users begin to switch back toward gas or to
reactivate industrial demand. Gas prices may flirt with the lower boundary so
long as the weather is not too hot across too many regions, allowing storage
injections to increase and providing hopes for an adequately supplied winter.
Above-normal heat in only one or two regions, however, or even the threat of
storms in the Gulf of Mexico will pull prices quickly upward. As for the
upper boundary, although prices in specific regions such as California and
the Northeast may reach above $5.00, an actual storm in the Gulf or more
widespread heat than!
 has yet occurred this summer appears required to pull the Henry Hub much
above $4.50.

Absent tropical storm activity in the Gulf of Mexico, CERA expects prices to
settle into the lower portion of this band during September (see Table 1).
Although strong power loads and the resulting weak injection rates are likely
to sustain prices through much of August, the seasonal decline in generation
demand into September should allow storage injections to increase by 1.5
billion cubic feet (Bcf) per day. As a result, CERA expects prices to settle
somewhat, averaging $3.95 per MMBtu at the Henry Hub during September.
However, the larger fundamental force in the market remains unchanged:
supplies are adequate with any certainty only for another warm winter. Any
interruption in supply or abnormal demand will quickly drive prices upward;
next month may represent the low for the remainder of the year.

Gas Storage--Not Yet Enough

Mild weather over much of the United States during July allowed a much-needed
recovery in storage injections, with the estimated injection rate increasing
by nearly 2.5 Bcf per day from year-earlier levels (see Table 2). This rate
was enabled entirely by lower demand, however, and not added supply. The
result is that under more normal summer weather conditions during August, the
US storage inventory deficit is likely to remain stubbornly near 350 Bcf.
Although the deficit is likely to decline on average during August, it is
even more likely to expand again during September, especially should any
storm necessitate evacuation of offshore platforms. Absolute inventories and
supply adequacy for this winter therefore remain a concern in the market.

Inventories are unlikely to reach levels adequate to prevent record lows from
occurring next spring. Should injections continue as expected, inventories
would reach approximately 2,750 Bcf by October 31; but reaching even this
level, still an all-time low annual maximum inventory, requires some help
from a lack of storm activity and a lack of heating load in October. Storage
inventories are not yet sufficient to relieve market pressure and are
unlikely to become so by the beginning of the heating season.

Regional Markets--Western Disconnects Continue

Wide differentials emerged this summer in the West and look likely to persist
through September. In Southern California record summer demand levels have
pushed pipeline flows to new highs. Topock continues to be the premium
pricing point in North America. In the Rockies supply growth has pushed up
pipeline flows out of the region. Power loads should ease somewhat in
Southern California, and that easing will bring some decline in the Topock
premium. Pressure on Rocky Mountains and San Juan prices should persist until
the start of the heating season in late October (see Table 3).

CERA's outlook by region follows:

*  Rockies. Pipeline capacity out of the Rockies is running nearly full to
every export market except the San Juan Basin. Emerging pipeline bottlenecks
should keep differentials wide during September, with an average differential
of $0.75 per MMBtu.

*  San Juan. In the San Juan increased imports from the Rocky Mountains and
high utilization rates on capacity into California are pressuring prices.
CERA expects differentials to average $0.55 per MMBtu for the month of
September. San Juan differentials will narrow more substantially when Rocky
Mountain pipeline bottlenecks are relieved by increases in heating demand
during the fourth quarter.

*  Permian and Mid-Continent. Strong power loads in Texas have supported
Permian Basin prices during July and August. Persistent power demand is
expected to keep differentials around $0.08 per MMBtu for September.
Mid-Continent prices should average just under Permian prices.

*  Chicago. Steady storage injection loads are unlikely to support prices at
Chicago in the face of declining power generation into September. July
premiums of $0.06 to $0.07 have already come down in early August and are
likely to remain low, at approximately $0.03 for September.

*  Northeast markets. Northeast price premiums have averaged from the
mid-$0.20s to the mid-$0.30s, depending on generation load and proximity to
the New York Facilities Group major meters. CERA expects little to change
this relationship, but as generation loads decline into September, premiums
could move closer to the fuel cost floor, the mid- to high $0.20s.

Canadian Markets--Supply Growth Still Disappointing

Although June displayed year-over-year growth in production in western
Canada, July reverted to a decline, and August is running close to last
year's level. The current expectation is for over 15,500 well completions in
2000, approximately 9,200 of which are expected to be gas wells. Even if the
trend toward shallow drilling does not change substantially, the sheer number
of wells is expected to produce a supply build by year-end and into 2001. For
2000, the total western Canadian supply build is expected to be flat with
1999, increasing to a positive growth of 350 MMcf per day in 2001.

Demand Slow but Exports Up

TransCanada flows are down 275 MMcf per day on average for 2000 but have been
down by over 350 MMcf per day so far in the third quarter. PG&E GT-NW volumes
were up by over 300 MMcf per day in June and July but have dropped to
year-earlier levels in August and are expected to remain close to last year's
levels for September. Northern Border Pipeline is operating at rates similar
to last year's on average in 2000 but is expected to decrease about 50 MMcf
per day for the third quarter. Western Canadian demand is currently up
slightly, driven by the warmer-than-normal weather in late July and early
August, but should be closer to 1999 levels in September.

High Prices: Wide Differentials

The AECO-Henry differential has widened quite dramatically over the past few
months from the low US$0.30s of the first quarter to US$0.84 in July. The
differential increased to well over a dollar in the second week of August,
but the driver for that increase was maintenance that reduced the export
capacity at Empress. August and September are expected to average in the
mid-$0.80s.

AECO is expected to average C$4.67 per gigajoule (GJ) (US$3.35 per MMBtu) for
August, with September softening to C$4.53 per GJ (US$3.25 per MMBtu) for a
third quarter average of C$4.54 per GJ (US$3.25 per MMBtu).

**end**

Follow URL for PDF version of this Monthly Briefing with associated tables.

**********************************************************************
Account Changes
To edit your personal account information, including your e-mail
address, etc. go to: http://eprofile.cera.com/cfm/edit/account.cfm

This electronic message and attachments, if any, contain information
from Cambridge Energy Research Associates, Inc. (CERA) which is
confidential and may be privileged. Unauthorized disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this message or any attachments,
in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited.

Terms of Use: http://www.cera.com/tos.html
Questions/Comments: webmaster@cera.com
Copyright 2000. Cambridge Energy Research Associates


Here it is...you gonna split the money with me right??

---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 10/10/2000
01:29 PM ---------------------------

Scott Crowell <scott.crowell@oracle.com> on 06/09/2000 10:51:45 AM
To: Phillip Love <Phillip.M.Love@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Jenny's Resume

Phil,

I have attached Jenny's resume.  Don't forget to fill out the paperwork
before you pass the resume along so you get credit.  Please try and do
this as soon as you can.  Thanks.

Scott

 - Jenny Resume.doc
 - scott.crowell.vcf


From http://www.enerfax.com :

AGA Natural Gas Storage Report

            Week                                    Prev
           Ending    Prev                   Prev    Year
| Region | 1/11/02| Week | Diff | % Full | Year | % Full|
| Prod   |  733    |  777 | -44  |  78%   |  343 |  35%  |
| East   | 1396    | 1482 | -86  |  76%   |  880 |  46%  |
| West   |  400    |  407 |  -7  |  79%   |  236 |  47%  |

| Total  | 2529    | 2666 |-137  |  77%   | 1459 |  44%  |

From http://powermarketers.com :

FERC Gives OK to North BajaPipeline
Jan. 16 -- The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission gave final approval on Wednesday to the U.S.segment of the North Baja Pipeline project that will bring natural gas from Mexicoto fuel electric generating plants in southern Californiaand northern Mexico. The $230 million pipeline will be operated by an international subsidiary of Sempra Energy , PG&E Corp. and Mexico-based Proxima Gas S.A. de C.V. The 215-mile pipeline (346-km) would carry up to 500 million cubic feet of natural gas per day. FERC gave final approval for the project after determining the pipeline would not harm the environment.
For more details see the LA Times article at:
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-000004310jan17.story?coll=la%2Dheadlines%2Dbusiness .

From the AnchorageDaily News:

Universityof HoustonStudy Favors Phased Development of Northern Frontier Gas
An energy consultant who grew up in Alaska believes the least risky way to tap the North Slope's huge natural gas reserves is to do so in stages, running multiple pipelines across the Canadian Arctic during the next 16 years.
Ron Oligney, director of engineering research development at the Universityof Houston, said Tuesday that smaller pipelines built every few years would reduce the huge costs and risks that would come with a single, larger pipeline to the Lower 48.
He and colleague Jim Longbottom of the Universityof Houstonrecently completed a study on Alaskaand northwest Canadagas development. The university and private clients paid for the study, he said. On Tuesday, Oligney presented the findings to members of the Society of Petroleum Engineers and the International Association of Energy Economics at the AtwoodBuildingin downtown Anchorage.
For the whole story go to:
http://www.adn.com/business/story/750563p-802532c.html

Bob Brooks
GPCM Natural Gas Market Forecasting Systemhttp://gpcm.rbac.com


Thought you all would get a kick out of this...... ..... Art

----- Original Message -----
From: "Richichi, Joseph" <JRichichi@Christianacare.org>
To: "Hess, Robert" <RHess@Christianacare.org>; "Dahllof, Barry"
<BDahllof@Christianacare.org>; "MacDonald, Lynn"
<LMacDonald@Christianacare.org>; <jrichtrek@aol.com>; "Art Kretz (E-mail 2)"
<akretz@glasgowmedicalcenter.com>; "Bolton, Boyce "
<BBolton@Christianacare.org>; "James N. Hoskinson (E-mail)"
<jimrosa@ix.netcom.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 5:23 PM
Subject: FW: Problem Solving

>

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
smu-betas-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

 - Flowchart Resolution.pps


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Schoppe, Tammie
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 12:19 PM
To:	Luce, Laura; Vickers, Frank; Redmond, Brian; Tycholiz, Barry; McMichael Jr., Ed
Cc:	Hogan, Irena D.; Bates, Kimberly; Salinas, Michael; Presas, Jessica
Subject:	Meeting today with Louise
Importance:	High

Please send this invitation to everybody in your group to join Louise for a meeting today at 2:00 p.m. in 30C1.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Tammie Schoppe
Enron Americas-Office of the Chair
Assistant to Louise Kitchen
713.853.4220 office
713.646.8562 fax
713.253.2131 mobile


i knew about trickett but  not the other guy.


Lloyd,

Are you handling the ESCA software issues and the conveyance of this to NETCO?

Please let me know,

Thanks,

Doug


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 02/01/2001 03:25
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Chris Germany                           02/01/2001 12:22 PM

To: Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy
Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Trco Backhaul Rates

I left a message for the manager of Transco's Rates Department to call me.
If I'm reading this correctly, the forwardhaul and the backhaul commodities
are the same now.  In Jan, the "true backhaul" rate from Zone 6 to Zone 4 was
$.0448 plus surcharges, today its $.3037 plus surcharges.  We actually did
some deals based on the backhaul rate of $.0448 for the summer.

I suppose its too late, is there anyway this could be postponed until
October, after the summer period?

Media Inquiries: Chris Stockton
                 (713) 215-2010
Other Inquiries: Rate Dept. 1-800-248-0404, Option #7January 29, 2001

To:  Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation Customers and
Shippers

Re:  FT and IT Rates effective February 1, 2001

On January 24, 2001, the Commission issued an order in Docket
Nos. RP97-71-020 and RP97-71-021 which, among other things,
approved the pro forma tariff sheets included with the filing.
The Commission's order also directed Transco to file actual
tariff sheets to be effective February 1, 2001.  Transco intends
to file the revised tariff sheets with the Commission on February
1, 2001.  If accepted as proposed, outlined below for your
convenience are Transco=s Rate Schedule FT and IT rates effective
February 1, 2001.

Summary of Rate Schedule FT Demand Maximum Rates
(Excluding Surcharges)

Demand Rates ($/Dt)
                              Del. Zone

          Zone 1   Zone 2   Zone 3   Zone 4   Zone 5   Zone 6
Rec. Zone

Zone 1    2.1284   2.7625   3.6820   7.0221   9.4933   10.8315
Zone 2    2.7625   2.2262   3.1457   6.4858   8.9570   10.2952
Zone 3    3.6820   3.1457   2.5116   5.8517   8.3229    9.6611
Zone 4    7.0221   6.4858   5.8517   4.9322   7.4034    8.7416
Zone 5    9.4933   8.9570   8.3229   7.4034   4.0633    5.4015
Zone 6   10.8315  10.2952   9.6611   8.7416   5.4015    2.9303

Zone 4A (Mobile Bay) Demand Rate   $2.4072

Commodity Rates (cents/Dt)
                              Del. Zone

          Zone 1   Zone 2   Zone 3   Zone 4   Zone 5   Zone 6
Rec. Zone

Zone 1    0.24     0.50     0.75     1.86     2.74     3.20
Zone 2    0.50     0.30     0.55     1.66     2.54     3.00
Zone 3    0.75     0.55     0.29     1.40     2.28     2.74
Zone 4    1.86     1.66     1.40     1.15     2.03     2.49
Zone 5    2.74     2.54     2.28     2.03     0.92     1.38
Zone 6    3.20     3.00     2.74     2.49     1.38     0.50

Zone 4A (Mobile Bay) Commodity Rate   0.34

Summary of Rate Schedule IT Commodity Maximum Rates
(Excluding Surcharges)

Commodity Rates (cents/Dt)
Del. Zone

          Zone 1   Zone 2   Zone 3   Zone 4   Zone 5   Zone 6
Rec. Zone

Zone 1    06.37    08.72    12.00    24.10    33.10    37.96
Zone 2    08.72    06.76    10.04    22.14    31.14    36.00
Zone 3    12.00    10.04    07.69    19.79    28.79    33.65
Zone 4    24.10    22.14    19.79    16.51    25.51    30.37
Zone 5    33.10    31.14    28.79    25.51    13.41    18.27
Zone 6    37.96    36.00    33.65    30.37    18.27    09.27

Zone 4A (Mobile Bay) Commodity Rate   7.39

For additional information please contact your Customer Service
Representative or Rate Department Representative.

Charlotte Hutson
Manager - Rate Department
(713)215-4060


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/19/2001
04:43 PM ---------------------------
From: Jennifer Burns/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/19/2001 01:25 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Jeff's itinerary


Vince,
See below for my picks based on the resumes.   The others marked as "no"
might be OK as well, but did not seem to have as much slant towards finance.

--Stinson

Vince J Kaminski
04/04/2001 03:45 PM
To: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Resumes

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/04/2001
03:45 PM ---------------------------
To: <Vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Resumes

Here are some people you might want to speak with .? Siriam lives in
Houston.? Please see the attached resumes of the following:
?
Karim Ashktorab   Yes (might be expensive?)
Stephen Liu    No
Farshad Ravanshad  No
Matthew Rusk   No
Samir Ranjan   Yes
Cedric Chow    No
Sriram Vasudevan  Maybe (already in Houston)
?
Regards,
?
Scott Gerson
Focus Capital Markets
71 Vanderbilt Avenue
Suite 200
New York, NY  10017
(212) 986-3344 Tele
(212) 986-3370 Fax
 - FOCUS SRIRAM VASUDEVAN.Doc
 - FOCUS CEDRIC CHOW.doc
 - FOCUS SAMIR RANJAN.doc
 - FOCUS MATTHEW RUSK.doc
 - FOCUS FARSHAD RAVANSHAD.doc
 - FOCUS STEPHEN LIU.doc
 - FOCUS KARIM ASHKTORAB.doc


The trades are all similar so here goes:

Fixed Price Payer (Buyer)  Coral Energy Holding, L.P. ((EnronOnline Deal
#1150351)
     Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc.  (EnronOnline Deal #1150406)
     Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc.  (EnronOnline Deal #1150411)
     Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc.  (EnronOnline Deal #1150426)

Floating Price Payer(Seller)  Enron North America Corp.
Deal Date    4/20/01
Effective Date    10/1/01
Termination Date   10/31/01
Notional Quantity   5,000 MMBtu per day
Fixed Price    Last Day of NYMEX plus $0.3700
Floating Price    The applicable Determination Period Bidweek Average Price
in the
     row entitled "Malin" located in the "California" section of the table
entitled
     "Spot Gas Prices" in the first issue of Natural Gas Intelligence Weekly
     Gas Price Index for the applicable Determination Period
     or, simply stated
     NGI - Malin
Commodity    Natural Gas

If I forgot something, please let me know.

How is Karen Lambert by the way?  Has she been on vacation lately?

From: Tana Jones on 04/25/2001 10:05 AM
To: Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: Request Termination Agreements for 4 EnronOnline Transactions W/
ATTACHMENT

Attached is a list of four deals for some online "oops" trades.  Can you send
me the deal particulars so I can prepare terminations of the trades.
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 04/25/2001 10:04 AM -----

	Robert B Cass/ENRON@enronXgate
	04/25/2001 09:50 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny/ENRON@enronXgate
		 Subject: FW: Request Termination Agreements for 4 EnronOnline Transactions
W/ ATTACHMENT

Tana -
This e-mail includes the attachment.  It "fell off" my e-mail from last night.

Thanks -
Rob

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Cass, Robert B.
Sent: Tuesday, April  24, 2001 6:29 PM
To: Jones, Tana
Cc: Moorer, Torrey; Denny, Jennifer; Thomas, Sheri
Subject: Request Termination Agreements for 4 EnronOnline Transactions

Hi Tana -

We need your assistance in preparing termination letters for the transactions
listed on the attached spreadsheet and described as follows:

On Friday, April 20, 2001, four transactions occurred on EnronOnline that
were in error.  One transaction was with Coral Energy Holding L.P. and three
transactions were with Morgan Stanley Capital Group, Inc.  As mutually agreed
to by both the Enron commercial team and the respective counterparties, it
was decided that each of the four transactions would not be confirmed and
should be terminated.

The exact specifics are detailed as follows:

? The transactions occurred due to an inadvertent entry in the actual
production system of EnronOnline by a Product Control Group member, Melba
Lozano.  Melba activated a product assuming that she was in the EnronOnline
test system of EnronOnline.

? The product transacted upon is normally managed by Frank Ermis.  However,
in his absence on Friday, the product was managed by Matt Lenhart.

? Steve South, trader on the West Desk, called and notified both Morgan and
Coral that the product had been posted in error.  All parties agreed that the
transactions were not reflective of the normal pricing.  As a result they
further agreed that transaction confirmations would not be necessary and that
the deals would be "killed" on all sides.  (For reference of any telephone
tapes that may need to be pulled, the conversations with the counterparties
occurred around 2:00 pm.)

? No confirmations were generated as a result of the killing of the
transactions in TAGG.

? I spoke with Mike Grigsby on Monday (April 23, 2001) and advised him that
termination letters may be required by Legal.  He responded that he had no
problem with that.

Tana, please advise if additional information is required to complete the
termination letters or if another course of action is warranted.

Thank you,

Rob Cass
x35491