Wait?there are deer on our place? I thought it was strictly a "fur-bearing rodent" property!!!!

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris McComb [mailto:cmccomb@austin-mccomb.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 9:48 AM
To: 'chad knipe'; Brian Constantine; 'Chris McComb'; 'Keith McComb'; 'EriK Wollam'; 'Joe Parks'
Subject: RE: Possible new lease member

I was merely poking fun at those who are complaining about the size of the deer herd on our place.  I certainly don't have any complaints, especially if I get a shot at an exotic or two.

Chris McComb, P.E.
McComb Construction Co., Inc.
V.P., Business Development
512-385-5555
-----Original Message-----
From: chad knipe [mailto:knipe3@msn.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 8:31 AM
To: Brian Constantine; Chris McComb; Keith McComb; EriK Wollam; Joe Parks
Subject: Re: Possible new lease member
Yeah...what he said!!!!!!!!

----- Original Message -----
From: Brian Constantine
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 8:29 AM
To: chad knipe; Chris McComb; Keith McComb; EriK Wollam; Joe Parks
Subject: RE: Possible new lease member

Yeah and rattle in some unhunted area and kill 10 point's like Chad did!!!!

-----Original Message-----
From: chad knipe [mailto:knipe3@msn.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 8:10 AM
To: Chris McComb; Keith McComb; Brian Constantine; EriK Wollam; Joe Parks
Subject: Re: Possible new lease member

That means it's time to hunt outside the boxes.

----- Original Message -----
From: Chris McComb
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 7:55 AM
To: 'chad knipe'; 'Keith McComb'; 'Brian Constantine'; 'EriK Wollam'; 'Chris McComb'; 'Joe Parks'
Subject: RE: Possible new lease member

I agree, we started out with 3, went to 1, no we are going in the wrong direction again.  By the way, wasn't Mertz supposed to add more acreage to this ranch?  I think we have hunted everything we can on ol' Autry.

Chris McComb, P.E.
McComb Construction Co., Inc.
V.P., Business Development
512-385-5555
-----Original Message-----
From: chad knipe [mailto:knipe3@msn.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 7:22 AM
To: Keith McComb; Brian Constantine; EriK Wollam; Chris McComb; Joe Parks
Subject: Re: Possible new lease member
Wait a minute, lets think about this.  We already have one attorney on the lease, can we handle another??     We're gonna need a bigger ranch!

----- Original Message -----
From: Keith McComb
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 7:16 AM
To: 'Brian Constantine'; 'Erik Wollam'; knipe3@msn.com; cmccomb@austin-mccomb.com; Joe.Parks@enron.com; kmccomb@austin-mccomb.com
Subject: RE: Possible new lease member

If he buys the first keg, he's in!

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Constantine [mailto:brianc@saltgrass.com]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 11:12 AM
To: Erik Wollam; knipe3@msn.com; cmccomb@austin-mccomb.com;
Joe.Parks@enron.com; kmccomb@austin-mccomb.com
Subject: RE: Possible new lease member

Think this a great idea...he is just the ideal person to have on the lease
and as standup and nice of a guy you would ever want to know. I'd give him a
bid right away!!!

BC

-----Original Message-----
From: Erik Wollam [mailto:erwollam@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 11:04 AM
To: knipe3@msn.com; cmccomb@austin-mccomb.com; Joe.Parks@enron.com;
kmccomb@austin-mccomb.com; Brian Constantine
Subject: Possible new lease member

Deer All:

I have a person that might fit what we are looking for in the 8th spot or to

fill a gap left by Joe (who is currently unable to provide a firm response).

B.J. Johnson. Played football with Chad and I at Jesuit. Was a year a head
of us. Met Zander at UH in College and hung with he and Brian while they
were rooming together. Went to lawschool a few years after me. Is out and
doing well with at a well known plaintiff's lawfirm.
Nice guy. He mentioned a year or so ago to call him if we ever had a spot.
His dad used to take him hunting and BJ wants to return the favor. Looking
for a place he could take his dad once or twice a year, just to get out
there not to shoot deer. He has two small girls, is busier than I am and
would go no more than the rest of the Houston boys.

He is a good guy. Don't know much about his deer hunting experience, but I
don't care about that.

Chad and Brian give him the stamp of approval. My thought is we could
proceed as set with Chris and I splitting the 8th spot, but if Joe winds up
taking a job out of state (which is a possibility) we would be left with two

spots to fill and less time to do it. I think it might be best to offer this

spot to BJ and fill up all 8 spots, then if we lose Joe, Chris and I can be
the fall back plan.

Thoughts and comments from the McComb guys please.

Erik.

_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com


Jason,

Please secure the financial information for the captioned Delaware corporation that is interested in pursuing an ISDA for energy commodities with ENA.

Counterparty contacts:

David Brown:	(713) 647-4009
Tracy Bowen (Credit ) (713) 647-4004

FYI:	for online financial information the counterparty has given me their

	Dun & Bradstreet No.	79-982-1744

Cordially,
Susan S. Bailey
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, Suite 3806A
Houston, Texas 77002
Phone: (713) 853-4737
Fax: (713) 646-3490
E:mail:  Susan.Bailey@enron.com


NOTE:  YOU WILL RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE EACH TIME YOU ARE SELECTED AS A REVIEWER.

You have been selected to participate in the 1999 Mid-Year Performance
Feedback process by providing meaningful feedback on specific employee(s)
that have been identified for you.  Your feedback plays an important role in
the performance evaluation process, and your participation is very critical
to the success of ECT's Performance Management goals.

Please provide feedback on the employee(s) listed below by accessing the
Performance Management System and completing an online feedback form as was
described in the "ECT Performance Management Quick Reference Guide".  You may
begin your feedback input immediately.  Please have all feedback forms
completed by the date noted below.

If you have any questions regarding the Performance Management System or your
responsibility in the process, please call the Performance Management User
Support Hotline at the following numbers:

For U.S. Payroll Employees  -  713-853-4777, Option 4
For Canada Payroll Employees  -  403-974-6724

Thank you for your participation in this important process.

The following list of employees is a CUMULATIVE list of all feedback
requests, by operating company, that have an "OPEN" feedback status.  An
employee's name will no longer appear once you have completed the feedback
form and submitted as "COMPLETE" in the Performance Management System.

Review Group: ENRON CAPITAL & TRADE RESOURCES
Feedback Due Date: Jul 02, 1999

Employee Name                   Supervisor Name                 Date Selected
-------------                   ---------------                 -------------
GOSNELL, MARY G                 JEFFERSON D SORENSON            Jun 14, 1999
HARRELL, WILLIE L               JEFFERSON D SORENSON            Jun 14, 1999
NEUNER, DALE R                  JEFFERSON D SORENSON            Jun 14, 1999
RODRIGUEZ, BERNICE C            JEFFERSON D SORENSON            Jun 14, 1999


Steve,

Thanks for the dinner and chance to meet everyone Friday.  It actually was a pleasure to talk with Nancy (rare, I think for an interview situation).

I'm sorry to say I'm still in a holding pattern.  There are a couple of bits of information I still need to process, but I thought I would email you with some initial numbers.  I'd also like to confirm my understanding of Duke's compensation program.

Base Salary:  $150K-$175K/year

LTI:  100% of base salary paid out in options that vest 1/3 every year.

Performance Incentive:  2X to 6X base salary.

No contract.  Full relocation package.

This is what I recall from the interview.  If I'm wrong, I'd appreciate clarification.

Regardless of what happens, I appreciate your time and consideration.  I should be able to come to a decision next week.

Thanks,

Sean


(Embedded image moved to file: pic26500.gif)
Dear Natural Gas Customer,

Due to maintenance at Grand Chenier, swing ANR SE products have temporarily
been suspended on DYNEGYdirect.  Once this maintenance has been concluded,
DYNEGYdirect will reintroduce these products.  Thank you for your patience.

Sincerely,

Dynegydirect e-Care
 - pic26500.gif


Thanks, Nigel.

Gang, we really should get a group together to discuss this issue and how it
impacts the project development, EPC, and insurance approaches. A common
response to the change in the insurance coverages would seem appropriate.
Owners will want EPC contractors to take this risk if they cannot get it
covered by operational insurance, EPC contractors will be very loath to take
such a risk as this if not completely and securely back-to-back with the
turbine boys or compensated significantly for taking the risk without the
back-to-back. GE et al can be expected to resist taking the risk.

Sheila, would you and Kay check and see who might like to sit in on a
dicussion on this matter, I will check with Keith Dodson, and Mr. Lund could
you check with Mr. Gillis? Maybe meet or have a call next week?

 JWVS

	Nigel Carling
	04/02/2001 12:59 PM

		 To: John Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc:
		 Subject: WARRANTIES & INSURANCE
LATEST MARKET DEVELOPMENT #2

FYI
----- Forwarded by Nigel Carling/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 04/02/2001 12:59 PM
-----

	Paul E Parrish@ENRON
	04/02/2001 10:29 AM

		 To: Nigel Carling/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Spencer
Burton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
Cullen/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michael
McGarry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Bob
Meckna/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, James
Naeger/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Donald
Reid/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michael Guerriero/SA/Enron@Enron,
Kevin Ruffcorn/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rafi
Khan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Richard Quek/SIN/ECT@ECT, Manuel
Gallego/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, John R Ayres/NA/Enron@Enron,
Brett R Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron, davidlu@nepco.com, Dag Adolfsson/HOU/EES@EES,
Curly Baca/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Brian D
Barto/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kenneth Bean/HOU/EES@EES, Karl
Breckon/NA/Enron@Enron, John Cates/HOU/EES@EES, Ed Cattigan/EU/Enron@ENRON,
Ned E Crady/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Greg Curran/CA/Enron@Enron,
Scott Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Roberto
Figueroa/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, David
Glessner/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, David Howe/Enron@EnronXGate,
James A Hughes/Enron@EnronXGate, Christopher b Hunt/Enron@EnronXGate, Michael
Oehrle/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Larry Reynolds/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Rob Walls/ENRON@enronXgate, David K Bargainer/Enron@EnronXGate, Cheryl
Costa/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ed
Dannhaus/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Phillip
Foster/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Gavin
Gaul/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Bruce
Golden/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steve
Heck/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Edward J Hlopak
Sr/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Edward Hlopak Jr/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Ed
Husami/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John G
Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robert Lundin/NPNG/Enron@ENRON,
Michael Ranz/ENRON@enronXgate, Scott
Laidlaw/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joe
Lakes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Martin Penkwitz/HOU/EES@EES, Jim
Sutherland/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Brian Stanley/EU/Enron@ENRON,
Roger Tietz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Richard
Vincent/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, David Marshall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terry
Yamada/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James L Bouillion/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul
Clayton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: WARRANTIES & INSURANCE
LATEST MARKET DEVELOPMENT #2

To Distribution:

Recently we sent out a notice that the insurance market is requiring that
warranties from major equipment manufacturers [mainly prototype turbines]
were to come first before insurance. Following is a summary of recent market
changes that underwriters are requiring related to the vendor,s warranty
issues on prototype machines. Please note that the market could become more
restrictive and require the following on proven technology as well. This
market change should be incorporated into the contracts between Enron and its
vendors for the purchase of major equipment for power plants.

Underwriter requirements during:

Construction Period:

1. Vendor,s Warranty for the part that failed - required as builder's risks
policy does not cover it.
2. Vendor,s Warranty for resultant damage within the casing - now being
required by underwriters.
3. Vendor,s Warranty for resultant damage within vender,s scope of supply -
now being required by Underwriters.
4. Vendor,s LD's following all of the above - underwriters now requiring
before DSU [delay in start up] insurance responds on at least prototype
machines.
5. Vendor,s responsibility for collateral damage to items not within their
scope of supply and resultant LD's ) underwriters are not asking for this.

Operating Period [Permanent Insurance]:

1. Vendor,s Warranty for part that failed - required even though machinery
breakdown [boiler & machinery] coverage will respond.
2. Vendor,s Warranty for resultant damage within the casing - now being
required by underwriters.
3. Vendor,s Warranty for resultant damage within their scope of supply - now
being required by underwriters.
4. Vendor,s LD's following all of the above - underwriters not asking for
this.
5. Vendor,s responsibility for collateral damage to items not within their
scope of supply and resultant LD's - underwriters not asking for this.

We have been told that two-year warranties after Taking-Over are generally
all that underwriters expect.  We also have been told that if there were
problems such as we have experienced at Dabhol, longer warranties would be
extremely useful in arranging favorable terms and conditions on the permanent
insurance. If there were no problems after two years it would not make much
difference.

If you find that someone is not listed in the distribution list, please pass
this email to them. If you have any questions please call or email one of us
listed below:

Richard Vincent
David Marshall
Terry Yamada
Paul Parrish
Jim Bouillion
Paul Clayton


Yep, the time zone glitch.  I think he was looking at all deals in the
system.  I almost think we should deal with this April, and worry about the
rest when it comes up.   Will and I are also kicking around making the only
choice in deal entry PPT.  Let Enpower sort out the rest.  We can modify
stuff on the strip level, but PPT would be the only choice in blotter and at
the top of regular deal entry.

How does that sound?

c

   Kate Symes                03/26/2001 10:55 AM

To: Cara Semperger/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: More deals found by Will Smith

I'm unclear as to what Will found in these deals that needs to be looked at.
The first one (scary!!) has notes in the comments section of each leg that
say it was terminated on 9/30/98; however, there are still forward deal legs
that haven't been killed or zeroed out. I don't think I could consider myself
a deal control professional on this one - I'll need to talk to a trader. But
let me know what you want me to look for in the remaining deals. Is this part
of the time zone glitch?

Kate

Cara Semperger
03/26/2001 10:47 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: More deals found by Will Smith

Do you want to look into these, the first one made me nearly wet my pants!  I
think I want a deal control professional on this one.............   :)


How could resist being part of the Light Brigade?

Carlos.Sole@enron.com on 12/04/2000 04:53:47 PM
To: Kay.Mann@enron.com, Kathleen.Carnahan@enron.com,
David.K.Bargainer@enron.com
cc:

Subject:

      During the EPC discussions, today in Sao
      Paolo, someone from ESA commented on the attached article and
      how it's our "new" future.  The discourse then degenerated
      into how "complex" those types of contracts must, to which I
      quickly pointed out that they were in fact quite complex.
      It's like Rigby says, "EES -- we do better lightbulbs".

      Who Says Exit Signs Aren't Exciting

      Enron Energy Services (EES) is undertaking a rapid expansion
      into overhauling inefficient lighting systems for current and
      future customers. This includes the replacement of
      illuminated exit signs in commercial buildings -- 25,000 of
      which EES recently procured for installation over the next
      year. As part of this effort, EES teamed with Global
      Strategic Sourcing and DealBench to create a 45 percent
      savings over the old procurement process. In a highly
      successful collaboration, EES provided the technical
      specifications and market pricing information, GSS provided
      the deal expertise, and DealBench provided the technology.

      These illuminated exit signs, which will be used in the new
      Enron building and in commercial buildings of our customers,
      are big energy savers. Whereas exit signs typically use 40
      watts, the new signs use 4 watts. In addition, typical exit
      signs use fluorescent or incandescent lamps. The new exit
      signs use light emitting diodes (LEDs) and will achieve a 60
      to 90 percent savings in electrical consumption. But it
      doesn't stop there. The internal lamps that illuminate the
      exit signs typically need to be replaced every six months to
      a year. The LED-illuminated exit signs, however, only require
      replacement every eleven years.


-----------------------------------------------------------------
Your Email address has not been given to any third parties.
This special offer is only sent to EarningsWhispers.com
registrants who have opted-in to receive information and
special offers. This message is being delivered to you via
worldatamail.com.
------------------------------------------------------------------
As an EarningsWhispers.com opt-in registrant, you have received
this message about an offer from Charles Schwab because you
have indicated an interest in receiving information and special
offers including those pertaining to finance and investments.
------------------------------------------------------------------

****************************************************************
OPEN A SCHWAB ACCOUNT ONLINE TODAY!*

http://schwab.wd10.com/cgi-bin/mail.dll?E754

****************************************************************
Dear Andrew,

Whatever your investment goals - especially during times
like this - Schwab has the financial products, tools and
personalized service you need to make important investment
decisions.  Open a Schwab account online today and take
advantage of all that Schwab has to offer! Just click here
to get started:

http://schwab.wd10.com/cgi-bin/mail.dll?E754

As a Schwab client, you'll enjoy the ultimate in personal
service and benefits such as:

*   Anywhere, anytime account access via web, phone,
    wireless or branch (1)
*   Online analysis of your current investment holdings
*   Objective third-party research
*   Extended-hours trading (2)
*   Competitive equity commissions as low as $14.95 per
    electronic trade (3)

Given today's changing market, most people can use some
advice in managing their investments.  Learn more about
Schwab's products and services by calling toll-free at
1-877-520-8233, Monday - Friday, 9:30 a.m. - 8:00 p.m.
(EDT) or visiting Schwab's premier website, voted "Best
Internet Broker" in Gomez Advisors Spring 2001 Scorecard:

http://schwab.wd10.com/cgi-bin/mail.dll?E755

Or find a Schwab Investment Specialist at the Schwab
branch nearest you:

http://schwab.wd10.com/cgi-bin/mail.dll?E756

Whether you are an active trader or a long term investor,
don't put it off - open a Schwab account online today
and open yourself up to a world of smarter investing!

Sincerely,

Joshua Rymer
Senior Vice President
Schwab Online Business Development

----------------------------------------------------------

* Account opening is subject to account acceptance
by Schwab. Funding and trading restrictions apply
until signed application has been received by
Schwab.

(1) Access to electronic services may be limited or
unavailable during periods of peak demand, market
volatility, systems upgrade, maintenance or other
reasons.

(2) Extended-hours trading may not be suitable for
all investors and poses certain risks.  These risks
include, but are not limited to, lower liquidity,
higher volatility and wider spreads.

(3) $14.95 commissions apply to automated equity
trades (for 1000 shares or less) in eligible
accounts once 61 or more qualifying trades are
placed per quarter. For more information, go to:

http://schwab.wd10.com/cgi-bin/mail.dll?E757

You can e-mail us by clicking on
mailto:info.request@schwab.com

------------------------------------------------------------------
[ alewis@ect.enron.com ]
If you would like to be omitted from future email offers via the
EarningsWhispers.com email list please reply to this message with
REMOVE in the subject line.
------------------------------------------------------------------


Bill,

I have scheduled a time for you to meet with Tom, as well as three other people this Thursday, October 11th.  The first meeting time is at 2:30 p.m.  I've allotted 30 minutes for each person to meet with you, just so you know about how long you will be here.  Feel free to call me if you have any questions.

Sincerely,
Laura Vuittonet
713-853-1994

-----Original Message-----
From: Redmond, Brian
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 4:48 PM
To: 'bward@mitchellgs.com'
Cc: Vuittonet, Laura
Subject: FW: Follow-up

Bill,

I have asked Laura to set a meeting up between you and Tom.  He was out this week and will be out part of next week, so maybe Thursday will work.  I think she was waiting to see what his week looked like when he gets back next week.

Regards,
Brian

-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Ward [mailto:bward@mitchellgs.com]
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 3:28 PM
To: Redmond, Brian
Subject: RE: Follow-up

Brian:
I never did hear from Tom, I assume he must have gone on vacation. The only day I am available next week would be Thursday, but the rest of the month look's good. I would like to meet with Tom, and then you and I can visit and further discuss the business plan goals, budget, future staffing if any and compensation guidelines for this position.

I really feel within the next two weeks I should have a good idea when everything will trigger or if I will have to leave anything on the table to be available Dec or Jan

Have a good weekend,

Bill
-----Original Message-----
From: Redmond, Brian [mailto:Brian.Redmond@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 3:07 PM
To: Bill Ward; Martin, Thomas A.
Subject: RE: Follow-up

Thanks for the information Bill - hopefully Devon will let you go with a
nice package.

Tom, I know you will be on vacation, but can you give Bill a call and
arrange a time to meet with him either before you leave or after you get
back.

Thanks,
Brian

-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Ward [mailto:bward@mitchellgs.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 2:39 PM
To: 'bredmon@ect.enron.com'
Subject: Follow-up

Brian:
I met with Devon last week and it looks like the deal will close
November
15th or Dec 1st. If we are able to agree on a position at Enron, the
earliest I could be available would be December 1st, if the deal closed
on
schedule, the latest would be January 4th taking in consideration of the
Christmas Holidays. Brian at your convenience I would like to visit your
office and see your operations and meet Tom.  I will be available
Thursday
and Friday of this week or the week of October 15th.

Thank you,

Bill

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


On coalitions, I was thinking about other market participants.  Agreed that Cinergy could be the vehicle.  Also, maybe make an informal presentation to FERC before any filing, etc.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Migden, Janine
Sent:	Wednesday, September 05, 2001 11:47 AM
To:	Steffes, James D.
Subject:	RE: ICC- Balancing

I think we should try to get a coalition tgether, but I would be more inclined to approach the Michigan and Indiana Commissions than Ohio or Illinois.  On a separate note, the advantage of an investigation over a complaint is that we dont have the burden of proof and getting the info to concretely prove what we suspect can at times be difficult if we go the complaint route.  Depends on the facts and the case. the meeting with Cinergy could be a good entre into getting a coalition together to approach FERC.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Thursday, August 30, 2001 8:55 PM
To:	Migden, Janine
Subject:	RE: ICC- Balancing

I'd say we want tariff language before any investigation.  I don't typically like investigations.  I like complaints.  My thought is to pre-sell tariff changes to FERC with a broad coalition and then get the Ohio PUC to ask FERC the question.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Migden, Janine
Sent:	Wednesday, August 29, 2001 8:15 AM
To:	Steffes, James D.
Subject:	RE: ICC- Balancing

Then I will pursue getting an investigation and if we get one, we can develop the model to push in that case.  I am assuming by model tha you are referrring to a mechanism that works for the midwest apart from or in conjunction with the ISO.  I will be with Mike and Jeff Merola tomorrow and will get started on working on this with them.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Tuesday, August 28, 2001 9:25 AM
To:	Migden, Janine
Subject:	RE: ICC- Balancing

We need a model for the entire Midwest independent of the ability to change.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Migden, Janine
Sent:	Tuesday, August 28, 2001 9:08 AM
To:	Steffes, James D.
Subject:	RE: ICC- Balancing

At this point we dont have draft language and we dont have a settlement with language that allows us to push the way we can in Ohio.  My thought was to push for an investigation and see within that context how far we could go.  At a minimum, if a hearing were to be granted, I think we could end up improving the balancing rules for IP, CILCO, etc.  Com Ed has the most favorable provisions and could end up being the model.  In my discussions with Jeff Merola and Rogers Herndon, they can work with this however it is not optimal.  They need to do a transaction in order to figure out where the bugs are.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Tuesday, August 28, 2001 8:39 AM
To:	Migden, Janine
Subject:	RE: ICC- Balancing

Janine --

If we have draft tariff language, I'd push pretty hard.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Migden, Janine
Sent:	Tuesday, August 28, 2001 7:53 AM
To:	Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.; Nicolay, Christi L.; Roan, Michael; Stroup, Kerry; Boston, Roy; Hueter, Barbara A.; Landwehr, Susan M.
Cc:	Shapiro, Richard
Subject:	ICC- Balancing

On Friday, I participated in ICC Chairman Mathias' Roundtable on the state of competition in Illinois.  One of the questions he asked was what the ICC could do to improve competition in Illinois.  I commented that the ICC could commence an investigation on the balancing rules of the various utilities, having pointed out the problem's with ComEd's and the fact that the other utilities are even worse.  He expressed concern over ICC jurisdiction and opined that to the extent that it impacts retail transactions and adversely affects retail competition, the ICC is within its jurisdiction to order the utilities to file an amended OATT before FERC for FERC's approval.  I plan to follow-up with a letter to him and all the Commissioners and would like feedback as to how hard I should push on this.  Should the ICC look into balancing (to which I give a less than 50% probability) we would have to be prepared to participate.  I think it would be highly worth the effort, especially as far as Illinois Power is concerned, however, I would like some feedback as to your views in order to guage how hard to push this.

Thanks,
Janine


>From: Ande Abbott <aabbott@cox.rr.com>
>To: mike taylor <lsutaylor@hotmail.com>
>Subject: Re: Thank you - another question
>Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2001 21:33:32 -0400
>
>There are 11 basic trade unions that are involved with each of the SCR
>installations.  I don't know if any non union contractors are installing
>SCRs - I would be surprised if there not some non-union firms involved in
>the South.  I only see the ones that our members install and the ones that
>our signatory contractors bid.  I don't see all the Request for Proposals.
>Each union has a jurisdiction that is unique to their craft.  The unions
>are
>the Operating Engineers, Insulators, Sheet Metal Workers, Laborers,
>Boilermakers, Iron Workers, Electrical Workers, Teamsters, Painters,
>Pipefitters and the Carpenters.
>
>The prime contractor or subcontractors would use a mix of each unions
>skills.  Pre-job conferences with the contractors allow the unions to know
>what skills are needed and when.  Once the construction schedule is set
>then
>the skilled manpower arrive to the job as scheduled.  The skill levels are
>normally predetermined by the union based on records in the files and by
>the
>test documentation.  Boilermakers are pre-tested for drugs and weld tested
>prior to getting to the job site.  Each craft will typically have a ratio
>of
>apprentices mixed with skilled workers.
>
>Since all the unions share the work they all become very proficient in
>their
>duties.
>
>I hope this is helpful.
>
>Ande Abbott
>
> > From: "mike taylor" <lsutaylor@hotmail.com>
> > Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2001 21:52:07 +0000
> > To: andea@erols.com
> > Subject: Thank you - another question
> >
> >
> > Ande,
> >
> > Thank you very much for the information.  I was figuring that many
> > constraints was going to be the answer.
> >
> > I am curious.  The labors who install the SCRs are they in unions?  How
>many
> > unions have the labors capable of installing the SCRs?  Is it one or two
>or
> > is 30 union?  Are there any people outside a union that installs SCRs?
> >
> > Thanks for the info,
> > Michael
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> From: Ande Abbott <aabbott@cox.rr.com>
> >> To: mike taylor <lsutaylor@hotmail.com> Subject: Re: SCR installations
> >> Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 19:41:46 -0400
> >>
> >> Michael - First I don't seeLabor as being the "main restraint."  Some
>plant
> > owners
> >> are very reluctant to get started on projects because of the New Source
> > Review
> >> requirements of EPA.  The cost of permitting and dealing with EPA keep
> > some
> >> plant owners from moving too quickly.
> >>
> >> It is impossible to predict the number of SCR's that could be installed
> >> because there are too many factors that must be taken into
> > consideration.
> >> Things like weather, permits, size of the job, prime contractor bidding
> >> process, parts availability, manpower, scheduling the installation to
> > match
> >> the normal outage, financing and etc.  As long as the construction
> >> schedules come at a reasonable pace there should not be any problems of
> >> manpower. Everything else is so hard to calculate.  The engineering is
> >> usually
> > pretty
> >> good - but several units gave our guys fits to construct.  We pride
> >> ourselves on delivering a job on time and at or below cost.  However we
> > can
> >> only deal with those issues that are within our ability to control.
> >>
> >> I'm sorry I can't be more specific but it isn't like piano tuning where
> > all
> >> facts are known and every job nearly the same.
> >>
> >> Ande Abbott
> >>
> >>> From: "mike taylor" <lsutaylor@hotmail.com> > Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001
> >> 16:04:42 +0000 > To: andea@erols.com > Subject: SCR installations > >
>Dear
> >> Ande Abbott, > > I am a college student following the NOx emmissions
> >> regulations.  I
> > read
> >>> your inteligent quotes on skilled labors in "Clean Air Compliance
> >> Review". > > There may be a rush to install SCRs so the plants can
>become
> > compliant
> >> by > 2003 or 2004.  I was trying to get a figure on the maximun number
>of
> >
> >> SCRs > that could be installed per month or per non summer season with
> > labor
> >> being > the main restraint. > > If you could shed any light on this
>area, I
> >> would really appreciate
> > it.
> >>>> Sincerely, > Michael > >
> >> _________________________________________________________________ > Get
> >> your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
> >
> >>
> >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
> > http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
>http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
> >
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


Tana,
;
I have a commodity futures account at A.G. Edwards, but there are currently
no positions in the account.; I do not think that will change;any time in the
foreseeable future.
;
Roger Gahunia
;

-----Original Message-----
From: Enron Announcements/Corp/Enron@ENRON;on behalf of;Mark Taylor (Vice
President and General Counsel)@ENRON
Sent: Tue 6/5/2001 6:42 PM
To: NYMEX Hedge Exemption List@ENRON
Cc:
Subject: PLEASE READ

To:;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;;
Department:; ;; ENA Legal

From:;; ;;;;;;; Mark Taylor;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; Date:;; May
11, 2001

;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; Vice President and General Counsel

Subject:;;;;;;; Enron North America Corp. NYMEX Hedge Exemption Applications

;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;
; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;;

We are in the process of preparing applications for position limit exemptions
for ENA,s NYMEX energy commodities futures trading.; These applications
require that ENA represent whether its officers, employees, owners, or agents
have a power of attorney, control or have a financial interest in any related
commodity future(s) account either individually or acting with another person
pursuant to express or implied agreement.

Please direct any responses to my paralegal, Tana Jones, via intercompany
email or call her at (713) 853-3399 by the end of business on June 15, 2001
if you have any power of attorney, control or have a financial interest in
any commodity futures account (other than an ENA or other trading affiliate
account).

IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A COMMODITY FUTURES ACCOUNT, YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESPOND TO
THIS REQUEST.


you still ain't got it?  I sent it to you twice yesterday.  You think we have
an email problem?

Best,
Jeff


The $1.3 trillion tax cut which is frequently quoted by the press is over 10
years, the $460 tax cut below is over five years.

Maureen Raymond
01/02/2001 12:44 PM
To: Alhamd Alkhayat/NA/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Margaret
Carson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Ken Lay's Speech

I looked into the proposed tax cut by George W. Bush.  On his website he
proposes a $460 billion tax cut over five years.
 The $213 billion "energy tax" imposed  from 1999 to 2001 by higher energy
prices, is roughly half of Bush's proposed tax cut.

Maureen


Start Date: 10/9/01; HourAhead hour: 7;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001100907.txt

Error retrieving HourAhead price data - process continuing...


4 Chelsea Place
Houston, TX  77006
713-521-4442 (ph)
713-874-0170 (fx)


Attached is Staff's first data request to PPL Montana, LLC and PPL  EnergyPlus, LLC.
 - Staff-PPL1.wpd


I did not draft the ISDA.  Some one in the Financial Group should be
notified.  The master I sent yesterday has been changed regarding "150%"    I
will attach  it again.    Please let me know if I can be of further
assistance.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490

	Sylvia S Pollan/ENRON@enronXgate
	06/05/2001 04:23 PM

		 To: Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Darren Vanek/ENRON@enronXgate
		 Subject: RE:

Debra,

Their are a couple of type-o's on the ISDA.  We already discussed 1.50% to be
changed to 150%  Please change NG Trading LLC to NG Energy Trading LLC
I would like to send this ISDA out tomorrow morning.

Thanks,

Sylvia

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Perlingiere, Debra
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 3:12 PM
To: Pollan, Sylvia S.
Subject:

 << File: NG Energy.doc >>

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Here is the suit that was filed against 29 top directors/officers on Wednesday.  The list of loot by individual is on page 11 and 12.

Patrick


To Keith
$20,709


The following file contains a graphical view of the North American Gas average deal count by Trader and Product for EOL. This information is for comparative analysis only.  Do not update links when opening this file.

If you have any questions regarding this breakout, please let me know .

Thanks,
Matt Motsinger
EnronOnline
x35221


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  ? 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now in the most recent version of Adobe Acrobat 4.0 and they
should print clearly from Adobe Acrobat Reader 3.0 or higher. Adobe Acrobat
Reader 4.0 may be downloaded for FREE from www.adobe.com.

(See attached file: unlded33.pdf)(See attached file: hoil33.pdf)
 - unlded33.pdf
 - hoil33.pdf


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Jamie_K_Schnorf@fpl.com@ENRON   On Behalf Of Jamie_K_Schnorf@fpl.com
Sent:	Wednesday, February 06, 2002 10:16 AM
To:	Art_R_Morris@fpl.com; Spraggins, Gary; Linhart, Joe; Michael_Jessop@fpl.com; Janzen, Randy; Ronald_Scheirer@fpl.com; TransOKnoms@enogex.com
Cc:	Forbish, Sherry; Greaney, Chris
Subject:	Lamar Nominations (Feb 7)

Attached is the NNG Lamar burn schedule for February 7, 2002.  At this time
we plan on  60,000.

Thanks

Jamie Schnorf - FPL
561-625-7032
(See attached file: 0202 NNG Lamar Nomination.xls)

 - 0202 NNG Lamar Nomination.xls


thanks for your note! not sure if you are in today at all, but if so, have a
GREAT trip and be careful. happy turkey day too! mb

-----Original Message-----
From: Gerald.Nemec@enron.com [mailto:Gerald.Nemec@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 1:12 PM
To: mbeckworth@velaw.com
Subject: Happy Thanksgiving!

Hey Melissa,

I am trying desperately to do everything I need to before I leave tomorrow.
We are in the middle of performance reviews at Enron and I have to review
about 10 others that I work with.  These are not easy to complete, but I
guess I'll get through them.

Wanted to wish you a Happy Thanksgiving before I left.  Have fun in FW and
at the game.  That is the hardest part of going to Spain right now.  I sold
my tickets to the game, but I will be there in spirit.

We ought to go get some dinner after I get back.  I will be back next
Monday.  Hopefully I won't have any disaster vacation stories of the type
you told me at lunch!

Take care,

Gerald
          ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.  This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system.  Thank You


Sounds OK to me.  Thanks.  DF

	From:  Susan Scott                           04/03/2000 02:48 PM

To: Drew Fossum@ENRON
cc:

Subject: SoCal motion

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 04/03/2000
02:47 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Susan Scott                           04/03/2000 02:48 PM

To: Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON,
mbaldwin@igservice.com
cc:

Subject: SoCal motion

See the attached.  Enron Corp. has already authorized Brian Cherry to add
Enron to the list of parties at the end of the document.  I recommend TW do
the same.  I propose that we ask Brian to add TW to the list, with a footnote
that we support the transmission proposal only and do not oppose the other
parts of the term sheet.  (I propose this out of an abundance of caution
because in one part of the document Brian states the parties have agreed on
comprehensive settlement, but later in the document he states that the
parties aren't fully committed yet.)  If he will not agree to do this, then I
would suggest we leave TW off the list and file a letter with the CPUC along
the lines of what I circulated yesterday, with additional language supporting
the motion for extension of time.  Let me know what you think.


Ratios are still in progress. thanks.


Are you coming over on Saturday night?

We can talk then.

Chris


This will just be Rome and Enron.  Although we believe that most of his claims really are against HMS, his lawyer is claiming that Enron used HMS to defraud Rome.  His lawsuit will be against only Enron.  Therefore, it makes no sense to drag HMS into this at this point (although they probably will have to be involved in some fashion after suit is filed).

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Howard, Kevin A.
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 10:42 AM
To:	Cash, Michelle
Subject:	RE: Bill Rome-- PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL

Have we received a list of other people that will be involved in the mediation?  Hanover Compressor, Hanover Measurement, etc.

Kevin

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cash, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 9:05 AM
To:	Howard, Kevin A.
Cc:	Garland, Kevin; Goode, Diane
Subject:	RE: Bill Rome-- PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL

I have spoken with Kevin on this.  Rome's attorney has asked for a mediation with Gary McGowan, who is an outstanding mediator.  We have agreed.  My paralegal, Diane Goode, will be calling you to schedule the mediation time as well as time for a preparation meeting.  I am in the process of preparing a chronology of events for you and Kevin, since he said that you should be the one involved in such a mediation.

If, prior to that, you would like to engage Rome in settlement discussions directly, feel free to do so.  I doubt that he will want to talk about it without his lawyer.

He still is an employee, but his deadline for redeployment is 10/31, at which time his employment will be terminated.  We will continue to honor his contract and pay him through the end of the Term, although he will not remain an employee of Enron.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Michelle

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Howard, Kevin A.
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 8:45 AM
To:	Cash, Michelle
Subject:	Bill Rome

Michelle:

What is the status of Bill Rome?  Kevin Garland would like me to take another run at reaching some mutually agreeable solutioin with Bill.  Have we paid him the remainder of his contract?

Kevin


Unless Jean hears otherwise, I don't think that Enron needs to be doing anything that conflicts with the key policy arrangement on the marketer being the customer of record for the T&D services.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Adzgery, Ronald
Sent:	Tuesday, October 02, 2001 3:22 PM
To:	Steffes, James D.
Cc:	Ryall, Jean; Hetrick, Nancy; Apke, Beth; Coats, Edward; Fischer, Jeffrey K.
Subject:	RE: Letter to PUC Regarding Texas Taxes on T&D Services

Jim:

David Gross, who is representing The New Power Company before the Texas PUC regarding the tax issue on T&D services, is asking whether Enron plans to submit anything to the PUC on the tax issue before tomorrow's Open Meeting.

I checked the PUC's agenda for that meeting and did not see the tax issue listed, however, TXU, Reliant and Entergy have all filed requests with the PUC to have the tax issue considered at tomorrow Open Meeting.

What can I tell The New Power Company?

Ron

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hetrick, Nancy
Sent:	Monday, October 01, 2001 7:40 PM
To:	Apke, Beth; Fischer, Jeffrey K.; Adzgery, Ronald
Cc:	Steffes, James D.; Ryall, Jean; Coats, Edward
Subject:	RE: Letter to PUC Regarding Texas Taxes on T&D Services

In my opinion this is not beneficial to EES at all.  We have been following this issue through our Retail Market Subcommittee and all REPS are not happy with this process.  We are now required to calculate, collect and remit all taxes related to T&D charges.  We also take a hit on Gross receipts tax.  Jim, you should call and talk to Ron Adzgery.  Thanks.

Nancy A. Hetrick
Enron Corp.
Director, Government Affairs
Phone:  712-366-3399
Pager:   888-912-1426

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Apke, Beth
Sent:	Monday, October 01, 2001 11:00 AM
To:	Fischer, Jeffrey K.; Adzgery, Ronald
Cc:	Steffes, James D.; Ryall, Jean; Hetrick, Nancy; Coats, Edward
Subject:	FW: Letter to PUC Regarding Texas Taxes on T&D Services

Ron and Jeff.

I spoke briefly with Jim Steffes this morning. Please do not proceed with any further efforts in this regard until we hear from Jim, Nancy or someone from their team.  It may be the Comptroller's position is beneficial to EES's business and we don't want to support or pursue a contrary position.

beth

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Adzgery, Ronald
Sent:	Friday, September 28, 2001 3:22 PM
To:	Ryall, Jean; Steffes, James D.
Cc:	Hetrick, Nancy; Fischer, Jeffrey K.; Coats, Edward; Apke, Beth
Subject:	Letter to PUC Regarding Texas Taxes on T&D Services

Jean/Jim:

Jeff Fischer and I in EES Tax have been working with Nancy Hetrick regarding the question of whether REPs will be responsible for administering Texas taxes on T&D services.

As you may have heard, at the request of a number of investor owned utilities, the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts has initially ruled that REPs will be responsible for administering the taxes.  This conclusion was based upon the assumption that the REPs are purchasing the T&D Services from the TDU and then reselling the services to their customers.

After a number of REPs objected to that ruling, the Comptroller's office agreed to reconsider.  We believe the Comptroller is worried about doing something that will have a serious impact on deregulation in Texas, so she is passing the question off to the Texas PUC by requesting that the PUC determine whether REPs purchase and resell T&D Services.

The New Power Company raised this issue with the PUC recently and at last count TXU and Entergy had filed responses of their own.  A number of tax representatives from several REPs thought it might be good to show the PUC this is a significant issue for all independent REPs.

Attached for your review and comment is a draft of a proposed letter to the PUC regarding this matter.  Nancy suggested we send the letter to you for your comments and to get clearance for EESI to sign the letter.  Thank you for your assistance with this.

Ron

 << File: Texas PUC tax response - revised.doc >>


Feudalism
You have two cows.
Your lord takes some of the milk.
Fascism
You have two cows.
The government takes both, hires you to take care of them and sells you the milk.
Communism
You have two cows.
You must take care of them, but the government takes all the milk.
Capitalism
You have two cows.
You sell one and buy a bull.
Your herd multiplies, and the economy grows.
You sell them and retire on the income.
Enron
You have two cows.  You borrow 80% of the forward value of the two cows from your bank, then buy another cow with 5% down and the rest financed by the seller on a note callable if your market cap goes below $20B at a rate 2 times prime. You now sell three cows to your publicly listed company, using letters of credit opened by your brother-in-law at a 2nd bank, then execute a debt/equity swap with an associated general offer so that you get four cows back, with a tax exemption for five cows. The milk rights of six cows are transferred via an intermediary to a Cayman Island company secretly owned by the majority shareholder who sells the rights to seven cows back to your listed company. The annual report says the company owns eight cows, with an option on one more and this transaction process is upheld by your independent auditor and no Balance Sheet provided with the press release that announces that Enron as a major owner of cows will begin trading cows via the Internet site COW (cows on web). I am sure you now fully understand what happened.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 05/22/2000
07:48 AM ---------------------------

RealPlayer News <news@real-net.net> on 05/22/2000 12:25:49 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FREE *A Better and Quicker Way to Use the Web!*

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
To unsubscribe from this email, please read
the information at the end of this message.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Dear RealPlayer User,

Let's say you have only five minutes to do
the following: Check your online calendar,
add something to a to-do list, send an
instant message, check how your stocks are
doing, and catch up on today's top news
headlines.

Five minutes? Are we crazy? Nope.

With the free Personal Desktop Portal by
InfoSpace, your life will become that much
more convenient and fun. The Personal Desktop
Portal gives you easy, free, and immediate
access to all the things that are most
important to you: Instant messaging, calendar,
address book, speedy search tools, to-do
lists, parental control as well as personalized
news headlines, weather reports, sports scores,
stock quotes, and lottery numbers. And the best
part is that all of these tools are at your
fingertips in a single easy-to-use toolbar on
your desktop.

Download InfoSpace's Personal Desktop
Portal today:

http://proforma.real.com/insp4/vkamins@ect.enron.com

THE NITTY GRITTY

-Free: Yes, the Personal Desktop Portal is free!
You won't pay a penny to use it. You'll even
have access to a free Internet service provider.

-Easy: Easy to get going and use. Simply click
the Web address above and the download begins.
(The file you are downloading is especially small,
making for a super quick download.) When you have
completed downloading and installing the Personal
Desktop Portal, click "Create New User Name" to
log in and set up your preferences. Simple as that!

-Centralized: Everything you need, all in one place.
No need to have many separate software applications
or go to several different Web pages to
send an instant message, chat, look up stock quotes,
see scrolling updated information and more. It's
all right on your desktop and at your fingertips!

-Personalized: Don't want a bunch of extra
information that you'll never need? The Personal
Desktop Portal allows you to specify what you do
and don't want to see. It's all about you.

Download InfoSpace's Personal Desktop
Portal today:

http://proforma.real.com/insp4/vkamins@ect.enron.com

Thanks for your time and have a great spring!

The Team at RealNetworks
Seattle, WA
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
ABOUT THIS E-MAIL

You are receiving this email because you
downloaded our RealPlayer(R) and indicated
a preference to receive product news, updates
and special offers from RealNetworks(R).

To remove your name from future email
communications, simply visit the following URL
and click on the Remove button:
==> http://ml.real.com/mlr/vkamins@ect.enron.com
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
RealNetworks respects your right to privacy
online. Your e-mail address will never be shared
with a third party without your consent. Our
privacy statement, which has been reviewed by
TRUSTe, is available at:

http://www.realnetworks.com/company/privacy/index.html
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
RealNetworks(R), Real.com(TM), and RealPlayer(R)
are trademarks or registered trademarks of
RealNetworks, Inc. Names of third-party companies
or products listed herein are trademarks or
registered trademarks of their respective owners.


If you don't have these already.

Monte,  I will help you with these.

KK


Your e-mail of 4/3 says that H&N is inactive.  I have a Transaction Agreement
Confirmation dated September 7, 1999, for delivery from 11/1/99 through
10/031/00.   Can you check for me to see if this Confirmation is still
active.

Transaction No.'s  N133881 / 111982.

Thanks
DP


Today is my grandmother's birthday......she would have been 92. Today is a
day to celebrate a woman's life who brought MUCH joy and love to me and many
others. She was there for me as a child .... to hold me, protect me, love
me. Over the years we tokk many long walks around the block in Leisure
World, watched jeopardy, wheel of fortune  and the evening news while
sipping on perfect Manhattans and having dinner, discussed golf and her
clubs and my new game, chatted about football, politics, and life til wee
hours....and then arose to read the headlines and drink coffee to chat all
over again. I will miss spending holidays with her, hanging out with her,
and being with her. She is the most positive woman I have ever known. She
always had a smile and good things to say. She brought such joy!! I will
miss her, her smile, and her answer of "I know" whenever I would tell her I
loved her. What a great long life she had.

Please keep my family in your prayers and let those around you "know" your
love in honor of my grandma, Margaret Gress.


Enron Global Travel Management (a division of Global Strategic Sourcing) is
pleased to announce that American Express Corporate Cardholders can now view
account details Online.

Highlights of this service include:
 Review previously billed, current, and unbilled charges
 Review corporate direct payments and personal payments applied to your
account
 Dispute a charge online, if needed
 Access customer service 24 hours a day, 7 days a week

To Log On to American Express Online Services:
GSS has prepared a special registration/log on page for Corporate Cardmembers
for your convenience.  To access it, go to http://travel.enron.com and click
on the Corporate Card button.

Cardmembers with cards issued within the last 45 days, need to call American
Express customer service to enroll.  The number is 1-800-297-1234.

If you have already registered your Personal American Express Card in the
American Express Online Services program:
Please click on the "Check Your Bill" link and login using your existing User
ID and password.  You will be able to add your American Express Corporate
Card to your existing registration by clicking on the "Update your Online
Profile" link which appears on the left hand menu bar once you are logged in.

We hope you enjoy using American Express Online Services.

For questions or additional information, contact Tracy Ramsey (Director,
Global Travel Management) at 713/853-6457.


Here's the draft that Allegretti is sending.
----- Forwarded by Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron on 09/27/2000 02:09 PM -----

	Mark Palmer
	09/26/2000 04:08 PM

		 To: Daniel Allegretti/HOU/EES@EES
		 cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Dereg Articles

I've taken the editor's pencil to Dan's draft.  Here's the result:

 Kirk Johnson's September 26th article, Debate on Need for New Power Plants
Ignores Conservation, leaves readers with the misperception that competitive
electricity markets discourage conservation.  True customer choice proves
otherwise.
 My company supplies electricity to a number of businesses in Maine.  One of
these customers is a  paper mill that uses more electricity than thousands of
homes.  When New England power prices temporarily spiked last May, we
actually paid the mill to shut down ... which they were more than happy to
do.  As a result, the customer made money, the grid worked better, and
residential customers didn't hear a word about "brownouts."
 The financial rewards in the open market create much better incentives to
conserve than do the bureaucratic, one-size-fits-all programs of the
regulatory elite.  It's proving true in Maine, why not give New York and
other states the same choice?

Dan Allegretti
Enron Corp.

If you like it, send it to the Letters to the Editor section at the New York
Times.  The protocol is on the editorial page.

Thanks for the quick response,

Mark


Ed:  This counterparty does not want a CSA!!!!!!!!!  Can you please call
Andre and discuss?  Sara

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Excellent

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	paul.kitchen@txu-europe.com@ENRON   On Behalf Of paul.kitchen@txu-europe.com
Sent:	Friday, January 11, 2002 8:57 AM
To:	louise@enron.com
Subject:	IT Consultants

---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Kitchen/EPETL/EASTERN on 11/01/2002
14:56 ---------------------------

From: Sean Dodd on 11/01/2002 09:45

To:   Andrew Peyman/EPETL/EASTERN@Eastern, Rupert
      Holbrook/EPETL/EASTERN@Eastern, Luke Edwards/EPETL/EASTERN@Eastern, Paul
      Kitchen/EPETL/EASTERN@Eastern, Daniel Godfrey/EPETL/EASTERN@Eastern,
      Roshan Weerasinghe/EPETL/EASTERN@Eastern
cc:
Subject:  IT Consultants

 For all you guys who had dealings with Structure ...

---------------------- Forwarded by Sean Dodd/EPETL/EASTERN on 11/01/2002 09:39
---------------------------

Once upon a time there was a shepherd looking after his sheep on the edge of a
deserted road. Suddenly a brand new Porsche screeches to a halt. The driver, a
man dressed in an Armani suit, Cerutti shoes, Ray-Ban sunglasses, TAG-Heuer
wrist-watch, and a Pierre Cardin tie gets out and asks the shepherd, "If I can
tell you how many sheep you have, will you give me one of them?"

The shepherd looks at the young man, then looks at the large flock of grazing
sheep and replies, "Okay."

The young man parks the car, connects his laptop to the mobile-fax, enters a
NASA Webster, scans the ground using his GPS, opens a database and 60 Excel
tables filled with logarithms and pivot tables, then prints out a 150-page
report on his high-tech mini-printer. He turns to the shepherd and says,

"You have exactly 1,586 sheep here."

The shepherd answers,

"That's correct, you can have your sheep."

The young man takes an animal and puts it in the back of his Porsche. The
shepherd looks at him and asks,

"If I guess your profession, will you return my animal to me?" The young man
answers, "Yes, why not?"

The shepherd says, "You are an IT consultant."

"How did you know?" asks the young man.

"Very simple," answers the shepherd.

"First, you came here without being called. Second, you charged me a fee to tell
me something I already knew, and third, you don't understand anything about my
friggin' business. Now can I have my dog back?"

      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~    DISCLAIMER    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

      This E-mail is private and confidential and may be covered by
      legal professional privilege. It is therefore only intended for
      the addressee(s). If you are not one of those persons you must
      not read, copy, store, disclose, use or distribute its contents.
      Please also contact the sender immediately and delete the original.

      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Mitch,

I need to get the LJM signatures.  I've spoken with the Finance folks who can
help with this, and I'll try to get that wrapped up asap.

Kay

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Mitch Robinson                           01/23/2001 09:31 AM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: SWPC Letter

Kay -

Can you give me an update on getting Enron sigs for the SWPC letter?  Have we
sent it back to Siemens?

Thanks,

Mitch


Linda, I may not be able to participate in the December 14th conference
call.  I do believe it is important that Robert Eickenroht participate along
with Jack Urquhart.  Jim


Gary Hickerson will be attending a Management Committee meeting on Friday, January 11 from 8:00 am to 2:00 pm, therefore, there will not be an EGM Organizational Post Petition Meeting on Friday.  The next meeting will be held on Monday, January 14 at 9:00 am CST in conference room ECN 30C1.  Please plan to attend or use the call in number shown below:

	Domestic Callers
	Dial 1-877-987-1409  Operator will assist with the call
	Leaders Name:  Gary Hickerson
	Pass Code:  Gary

	International Participants
	Dial 001-630-395-0119	Operator will assist with the call
	Leaders Name:  Gary Hickerson
	Pass Code:  Gary

LONDON EMPLOYEES ONLY:  Please meet in conference room SE1002 (tele# 011-44-207-783-0113) and dial into the meeting using the number above.  If you have any questions, please call Kathy Tibbs in London on ext. 5479.

Thank you.

Judy Zoch
Enron Global Markets LLC
Financial Trading
1400 Smith
Houston, TX  77002
(713) 853-0655
email:  judy.zoch@enron.com


Ken will be making a call to Bob Glynn at PG&E.  Please give the attached to
Ken before the call.
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 03/02/2001 12:33 PM -----

	Debbie R Brackett@ECT
	03/02/2001 10:46 AM

		 To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: William S Bradford/Enron@EnronXGate, Rick Buy/Enron@EnronXGate
		 Subject: PG&E Credit Exposure

Steve,

Per your request, I've attached a summary of credit exposure with PG&E as of
close of business on February 28th. We are investigating an increase in our
overall position as a result of basis movement in the west over the past few
days.

Please feel free to give me a call at 35856 if I can provide futher
information.


Bob,

Please activate some new Henry Hub Gas daily swaps that I created this
morning.

Thanks


rstalter@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:

The following message has been forwarded to the Tech Exchange at the request
of
Steven Keller of the NY PSC:

Statement of the Department of Public Service Staff to the BIC
Regarding Shortening the ICAP Obligation Procurement Period from Six
Months to One Month

The ICAP Working Group has proposed Phase II tariff language that
implements the BIC/MC decisions to implement a monthly ICAP obligation
procurement period (OPP) instead of the current six-month OPP.  It is our
understanding that this proposal is largely supported by incumbent load
serving entities who are currently required to purchase their ICAP six
month's in advance even though they expect to lose load to new entrants
during that period.  The LSE's are concerned that they may lose money
trying to sell unneeded ICAP back into the market.  Staff of the New York
State Department of Public Service (Staff) understands those concerns.

A report by the Brattle Group suggests that the existence of price caps in
New York could lead to capacity migration from New York under a one-month
OPP scenario.  Brattle suggests that under such a system certain
"optimistic" suppliers might choose not to offer to sell their ICAP to NY
if they think they could do better by selling energy into external markets
where they could earn high revenues in high demand month.   If that
happens, even to a limited extent, we believe it will likely result in
increased purchase costs for ICAP purchased both on a bilateral basis and
through the ISO auctions, and could also push up energy prices.

In a subsequent study by KEMA it is suggested that in order to avoid
capacity migration ICAP deficiency charges should be increased as much as
six-fold.  The obvious result would be that all LSE's would be exposed to
significantly higher deficiency charges under a
one-month OPP.  Staff does not view this as an acceptable alternative to
retaining a six-month OPP even with its potential that LSEs may incur a
loss as a result of purchasing ICAP for load they expect to lose.

As of November 29, 2000, the ISO has been unable to estimate the level of
deficiency penalties that would be required to avoid capacity migration
under a one-month OPP.  As a result, the New York State Department of
Public Service has been unable to verify whether the current levels need
to be increased, decreased or left as they are.  Because of concerns about
capacity migration, and because there is very little convincing argument
about the costs/benefits that would result from moving to a one-month ICAP
OPP that cannot at least partially be obtained from the six month OPP with
monthly deficiency auctions, Staff is opposed to such a change at this
time.   Until the ISO and market participants work out how to ensure that
energy and ICAP markets will remain workably competitive even during peak
periods, we believe it is prudent to move cautiously with regard to
shortening the OPP.


Thanks Sharon!  df

	  From:  Sharon Solon                           03/08/2001 07:43 AM

To:	Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject:	Organization Announcement

Congratulations and best wishes on your new position!
---------------------- Forwarded by Sharon Solon/ET&S/Enron on 03/08/2001 07:42 AM ---------------------------

	  From:  Stan Horton, Chairman & CEO                           03/07/2001 10:57 PM

Sent by:	ETS General Announcement
To:	Enron Transportation Services Operations
cc:

Subject:	Organization Announcement

Michael Moran, currently Managing Director and General Counsel for ETS, has decided to retire after a distinguished 27-year career with Enron.   Mike has been a conscience and a statesman of our organization and it is hard for me to imagine the ETS organization without Mike.

Fortunately, Drew Fossum, currently Vice President and General Counsel for Northern Natural Gas and Transwestern, has accepted my offer to become Vice President and General Counsel of ETS effective April 1, 2001.  Drew will relocate to Houston and report to me in his new role.

To assist with transition issues and special projects, Mike has agreed to stay on board for several months as Managing Director and Special Counsel to the Chairman and will continue to report to me.

Please join me in congratulating Drew on his new assignment and thanking Mike for his many contributions to ETS and Enron.


PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL:  ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION, ATTORNEY WORK
PRODUCT

Matt,

Thanks for the heads-up on this issue.  I will confer with Janice and one of
us will get back to you.

Meanwhile, I think I may need further clarification about  what testing
methods were used by SGS at loadport and at discharge in Thailand and the
Phillipines.  My key area of concern is whether (as now appears unlikely from
your e-mail) SGS tested using both ASTM D3605 without ashing and ASTM D3605
with ashing at all the relevant points, and whether the test results were
consistent; e.g., whether the product was on-spec for both methods
immediately before loading, but off-spec for both methods at discharge in
Thailand and the Phillipines.  May I impose on you to provide one summary
chronology of the analysis done at loadport and both discharge ports, with
particular emphasis on (a) whether both testing methods (ASTM D3605 without
ashing and with ashing) were used, and the results, and (b) the results for
filterable dirt? (You have just sent something like this for the Thailand
cargo only, which I found very helpful).   Also, if SGS or anyone else has
made comment about the reliability or unreliability of the filterable dirt
analysis (or any other aspect of the testing done by SGS of this cargo),
please let me know about that as well.

I appreciate your good help.

    Britt

	Matthias Lee@ECT
	08/08/2000 06:39 AM

		 To: Janice R Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Britt Davis/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angeline
Poon/SIN/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: D3605

Dear Janice / Britt

I know that Janice has kindly agreed to return to the team to advise and
coordinate with Mike Brown's team and myself in regard to the D3605 issue,
whilst I am to look to Britt's guidance for the contamination on the Elang
cargo. My apologies therefore for mixing the issues for the puposes of this
e-mail.

The joint testing of samples of the Elang cargo is planned to take place end
next week. The joint testing would include metals as well as filterable dirt,
so we would need to decide, in quite short order, on the test method we want
to propose for metals for relevant parties to agree.

Although we believe the contamination would be dramatically demonstrated by
the level of filterable dirt, the metals clearly would also be an important
factor. As you may be aware, the loadport sample results which we are
presently relying on to say that the cargo was on spec when loaded, was
tested with "ashing" for metals. We would not be able to say whether another
loadport sample would test on spec for metals using straight D3605. If it
doesn't test on spec at the joint testing using straight D3605, the vessel
owners would surely argue that the cargo would have been rejected by First
Gas anyway, independent of the filterable dirt. Although such as argument may
not defeat our case entirely, it is very likely to impact on the quantum we
would be able to recover.

It seems that the preferred test method for metals at the joint testing would
therefore be "ashing" to avoid conflict with existing loadport sample
results. We still have SGS's support for that, but we need to convince Minton
Treharne who acts for the cargo underwriters as well as the Owners/P&I Club.
Still, just in case details of our dispute with Mitsubishi become known to
Firts Gas, we may wish to avoid proposing a test method for joint testing
that would be inconsistent with the one we ultimately present to First Gas,
which for obvious long term objectives ought to be the CORRECT test method
acceptable to parties whether D3605 or "ashing" or some other method. That
said, I think if we are able to go with "ashing" for the joint testing, it is
not likely to jeopardize our position with First Gas.

I note Janice's preference for US experts over European experts for the D3605
issue. Have we been able to get any US experts' view on the right test to use
(whether D3605 or "ashing")? Has Enron formed a view on the "correct" test
method? If we have been able to source a "friendly" US expert, we may want to
have his input for the contamination issue.

Your views and guidance would be most appreciated.

Thanks and regards
Matt

I also note Janice's preference to source for US experts to assist us on the
D3605 issue over European experts and was wondering whether we have been able
to for


---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Kay Moore/HOU/ECT on 11/13/2000
08:32 AM ---------------------------

Carol E Word <ceword@paalp.com> on 11/10/2000 10:11:07 AM
To: "Mary Kay Moore (E-mail)" <Mary.Kay.Moore@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Prayer Requests from Wednesday November 8

Here are the prayer requests from Wednesday and I have added several emailed
prayer requests forwarded to me this week.  There are so many hurting
people.  It is great to know the Great Physician, isn't it?!!!

Sorry so late.  I pray that you will remember this one thing:

"I am your refuge and your strength.  Even though the earth gives way and
the mountains fall into the heart of the sea, do not fear.  I am an ever
present help in trouble."
Psalm 46:1-3

 <<Emailed Prayer Requests for week of Nov 6.doc>>  <<prayer requests for
November 8.xls>>

 - Emailed Prayer Requests for week of Nov 6.doc
 - prayer requests for November 8.xls


Just to remind you I am on vacation Thurs and Fri.

GFI requested a quote for NA Gas and Power, Coal, Emmisions, UK Power, UK
Gas, European Gas and European Power.  I have calls into George McClellan
(coal) and Tim Belden (West Power) to let them know about the negotiations.
I need to know who at Enron you have discussed this with in London to make
sure I run it past other interested parties in London prior to making an
offer to GFI.  I am now talking to one of the GFI Managing Directors in New
York and hopefully this will move the process along faster.

Amerex: Unwound $500 K / 75 % brokerage deal.  Asked them for a proposal for
zero brokerage.  Original offer we made was $400 k and zero brokerage.
Meeting schedules for Tuesday afternoon. Still waiting for John Nowlan to
reply on crude products and Marcello Romano to reply on European Bandwidth.

PVM: European Crude broker presented by Chris Glass; Forwarding NDA

ED&F Man: Waiting on Mary.  I will call if OK with you.

Prebon: Mike made initial offer with brokerage in it.  Mike informed Prebon
of new price structure. Prebon to call back on Monday.

Natsource: Jack is waiting on a draft of the Agreements to begin
discussions.  I will forward the Agreements once we approve.  I suspect early
next week.

Credit: Working with Debbie on security level versus headroom.  Modeling June
2000 to get feel of exposure.

Legal: Second draft of BETA is attached.  Bullet points for Fee Agreement are
also attached.  Liquidated damages and margining are covered in Section 3(f)
and (g)


**********BREAKING NEWS**********

from STOCKFIRST and TheInvestorOnline
www.stockfirst.com
www.theinvestoronline.com
_____________________________________

Stockgroup Partners With North American Quotations

NAQ Signs Agreement to Resell Stockgroup's Financial Software
and Content System

Stockgroup Information Systems Inc. (OTCBB:SWEB), a financial
media and technology company, and North American Quotations
Inc., a leading market data provider, announces the signing of a
resellers agreement.

Under the agreement NAQ will be an authorized reseller of
Stockgroup's financial software and content system. Stockgroup
provides more than 25 proprietary software objects including
real-time quotes, delayed quotes, stock charts, interactive java
charts, technical analysis, technical charts, mutual funds tools,
position-based portfolio managers, stock watch lists, intraday market
indices, stock screeners and many other tools.

The Stockgroup financial tools solutions include NAQ supplied data
on all North American exchanges and include information from
their proprietary database of 21,000 public traded companies. The
Stockgroup modular solutions are available as fully hosted solutions,
via XML or in a client-side format, which reside on the customer's
servers using application interface protocols.

NAQ's data feed customers are primarily brokerage firms, web site
operators and web developers, in addition to retail investor
customers for the NAQ real time trader service.

``NAQ has been an outstanding supplier to Stockgroup and our
companies have been great partners for years. We are excited about
our new agreement where we can combine our software and NAQ's
data feed to provide NAQ's customers with a completely integrated
financial information solution,'' stated Marcus New, CEO of
Stockgroup.

``We are excited to be working with Stockgroup,'' stated Carole
Olkowski, CFO of NAQ. ``Not only are we providing sophisticated
financial decision-making tools to our customers, Stockgroup also
offered our clients the best, most cost-effective solution in the
marketplace. They have done a tremendous job working with our
data feed.''

In addition to the reseller agreement, Stockgroup will market NAQ's
Real Time Trader Professional investor application through
Stockgroup's smallcapcenter.com investment research community.

_____________________________________

About NAQ

NAQ, Inc. is a privately held corporation formed in 1982. In 2001,
NAQ converted all its data sources to direct Exchange Feeds at its
Ticker Plant in London, On, Canada. NAQ provides
State-of-the-art wholesale data feeds for the financial industry. NAQ
also markets Real Time Trader Professional for Real-time streaming
data and top of the line analysis and charting for individual and
professional investors. NAQ now carries over 600,000 symbols in
its database in real-time.

About Stockgroup

Stockgroup Information Systems Inc. is a financial media and
technology company. It is a leading provider of private labeled
financial content and software solutions to media, corporate, and
financial services companies. Stockgroup employs proprietary
technologies which enable its clients to provide financial data
streams and news combined with cutting edge fundamental,
technical, productivity, and disclosure tools to their customers,
shareholders, and employees at a fraction of the cost of traditional
internal methods. Stockgroup is also a provider of Internet
communications products for publicly traded companies. Its
financial web site www.smallcapcenter.com is a state of the art
online research center for the investment community. To find out
more about Stockgroup (OTCBB:SWEB), visit our website at
www.stockgroup.com

_____________________________________

Contact:

Stockgroup Information Systems Inc.
Rob Attwell, 800/650-1211
rob.attwell@stockgroup.com

or

NAQ, Inc.
Carole Olkowski, 800/465-4300

Visit the Company Website at www.stockgroup.com and go to
www.theinvestoronline.com/research/sweb092501.htm to see
TheInvestorOnline Research Report.

_____________________________________

This release contains ``forward looking statements'' within the
meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section
21B of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Any statements that
express or involve discussions with respect to predictions,
expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, goals,
assumptions or future events or performance are not statements of
historical fact and may be ``forward looking statements.'' Forward
looking statements are based on expectations, estimates and
projections at the time the statements are made that involve a
number of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results or
events to differ materially from those presently anticipated. Forward
looking statements in this action may be identified through the use
of words such as ``expects'', ``will,'' ``anticipates,'' ``estimates,''
``believes,'' or statements indicating certain actions ``may,'' ``could,''
or ``might'' occur.

_____________________________________

IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER

TheInvestorOnline is an independent electronic publication
providing information on selected public companies.

Any company profiled by TheInvestorOnline pays cash or stock
consideration for the electronic dissemination of the company's
information for a specified time period and/or our comments about
the company and/or our development of the company's website.
Section 17(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 requires that
TheInvestorOnline fully disclose the type consideration (i.e. cash,
free trading stock, restricted stock, restricted stock with registration
rights, stock options, stock warrants, or other type consideration)
and the specific amount of the consideration our company receives
or will receive, directly or indirectly, from an issuer, underwriter, or
dealer.

No information contained in our website or our publications should
be considered as a solicitation to purchase or sell the securities of the
profiled companies.

TheInvestorOnline is not a registered investment advisor or a
registered securities broker dealer. We do not undertake or represent
to make investment recommendations or advise pertaining to the
purchase or sale of the securities mentioned in our web site or
publications. The information contained in our website and
publications are carefully compiled by TheInvestorOnline based
upon sources that we believe to be reliable. TheInvestorOnline,
however, does not guarantee the accuracy of any information
contained in our website or publications.

Moreover, TheInvestorOnline does not endorse, independently
verify, or assert the truthfulness or reliability of any statements or
data made by us or the profiled companies in our website or
publications. Investors should not rely solely on the information
contained in our website or publications. Instead, investors should
use the information provided on the profiled companies only as a
starting point for conducting additional research that will permit
them to form their own opinions regarding an investment in the
profiled company's securities. The receipt of the information
contained in our website or publications shall not create, under any
circumstance, any implication that there has been no change in the
affairs of the profiled company since the date of our comments
regarding the company or the date of the profiled company press
releases or other information disseminated via our website or
publications.

The information contained in our website and publications may
pertain to small cap and/or thinly traded securities which by their
very nature involve an extremely high degree of risk. An investment
in these type of securities could result in the loss of some or all of an
investment in the company. In addition, due to the illiquid nature of
some of these securities, an investor may find encounter difficulties
in liquidating the securities.

TheInvestorOnline may liquidate the stock consideration it receives
at any time it deems it appropriate to do so. The liquidation of our
stock may have a negative impact on the securities of the company
liquidated, including decreased market value and/or dilution of the
company's securities.

The following companies have paid, or have agreed to pay the
parent company of TheInvestorOnline to: distribute the company's
information and reports in an email newsletter; post company links
on featured companies page, and compile and distribute quarterly
reports in an email newsletter.

Stockgroup Information Systems Inc. has paid in services exchanged
at an estimated value of $150,000.

---
You are currently subscribed to stockfirst as: alewis@ect.enron.com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-stockfirst-37848R@mail.stockadvisor.ws


Michelle,

Here is the spreadsheet with the four pipelines' throughput data for the mortgage review.

Call me if you have any questions.

Lorna M. Brennan
Competitive Intelligence
Enron Transportation Services
Omaha  402-398-7573


(See attached file: hpl0629.xls)

 - hpl0629.xls


Tom, no problem....

Can you reply to this note.... or advise how to incorporate the rotating symbol into a file.

Thanks, BT


Management Committee Meeting
Date:		Monday, November 26
Time:		11:00 a.m. (Central)
Location:	50th Floor Boardroom
Video:		Connections will be established with remote locations upon request.
Conf. Call:	Please contact Joannie Williamson for dial-in number and passcode.

Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting and through what medium.

_____	I will attend in person
_____	Via video conference
_____	Via conference call
_____	I will not attend

Please return this e-mail to me with your response.

Thanks,
Joannie
3-1769


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT on 06/05/2000
01:46 PM ---------------------------
Dale Neuner   06/05/2000 11:18 AM

To: Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Eric Saibi/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: US East Power Financial Swaps - REVISED

Carol St Clair has confirmed for me that the GTC does not contemplate a
'Correction for Prices'. John Suarez states that corrected prices must be
'flagged' by the ISO with 75 minutes of publication and must be changed
within 5 days. Since the GTC doesn't contemplate the issue and the mechanism
is different from ISDA,  I have added some suggested language to the Index,
as we should contemplate this issue in the Long Description.

My apologies for not having the attachment included in my last e-mail.

Dale

---------------------- Forwarded by Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT on 06/05/2000 11:14
AM ---------------------------
Dale Neuner   06/05/2000 10:13 AM

To: Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Eric Saibi/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: US East Power Financial Swaps

The East Power traders would like to commence transacting on financial swaps.
We had anticipated this, so the Product Type was already built and has been
approved. The Index and Loadshape built with this Product were done so based
on comments from John Suarez (the trader), who has approved the attached.

Leslie - please offer commets/suggestions from the power perspective.

Mark - final approval will need to come from you since this is a financial
product.

Also, trading wants us to consider price changes for the Product because the
prices published do change from time to time. I know that the ISDA
Definitions contemplate a 30-day true-up, but I can't find a like provision
in the GTC. So - I took a hack at some language to contemplate the issue:

"If the price published (as set forth herein) on any day during a
Determination Period is subsequently corrected and the correction is
announced within 30 calendar days of the original publication date, the
parties agree that the corrected price shall take affect as if it were the
price published on the original publication date and the Floating Price will
be adjusted accordingly. Payments of the adjusted Floating Amount will take
place 5 business days following notification by either party of a change to a
published price."

Dale
3-9746


These have been changed to CAISO.

	From:  Sharen Cason                           04/10/2001 02:21 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: corrections

I feel like I am picking on you today!

These deals have NP/SP delivery point with firm energy.

577829
577828

Thanks!


The word Suzanne heard is that they are moving everyone to the Enron Corp
book in the somewhat near future.  They moved me there from EI when I
transferred last March.

Kay

From: Barbara N Gray@ECT on 11/02/2000 10:01 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: E-MAIL ADDRESS

Kay, could you please have your assistant get your name and E-Mail address
moved into the "ECT Adress Book" rather than the ENRON Corp Address book.  If
there is a specific need for you to remain in the Enron Corp address
directory, please let me know.     Thanks bng


Tana -

Attached is the form fee agreement that we should start to use.  It is based
upon the TFS form which is currently consistent with the manner in which the
site will work (e.g., no more on line BETA).  Please confirm with Bob that it
is acceptable.  Once confirmed, please use as you need.

Thanks.  If you need me, call me.  I'll check in with you in the am.

Mark
Senior Counsel, EWS
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3490
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 04/03/2001
05:01 PM ---------------------------

Jackie Gentle@ECT
04/03/2001 12:34 PM
To: Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paula Rieker/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: CATS House of Lords Appeal

Mark Palmer has asked me to send you the attached reactive holding statements
in relation to the above.  It has been signed off by everyone here except
Michael Brown and John Sherriff, but we do not expect any material changes.
The result is due mid-morning London time tomorrow and we will advise you of
the outcome as soon as possible thereafter.

If you have any queries you can reach me tonight on +44 7967 381557.  Thanks.


The weekly price sheet is attached.  Please note that this is the first update of the sheet since 12/3/01.  It will now be updated each week going forward.

James Bruce
Enron North America		(503) 464-8122
West Power Desk		(503) 860-8612 (c)
121 SW Salmon, 3WTC0306	(503) 464-3740 (fax)
Portland, OR 97204		James.Bruce@Enron.com