Howard Cohen
3272 Cowper Street
Palo Alto, CA 94306
howard@cohensw.com

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Howard Cohen


This is to nominate the following for 5/5/2000 (Friday):

35,800 MMBtu into Eastrans

Redeliveries:

20,000 MMBtu redelivered at Lone Star/HPL Interconnect - Rusk County, Texas
 8,000 MMBtu into PG & E at Carthage
  7,800 from Fuels Cotton Valley into HPL

The price of the LSG/HPL Interconnect volume is HSC - $.05.

The volume of residue available for sale internally at Duke is:

35,800
X    .9
____
32,220
-28,000
______
4,220 MMBtu


Here's the latest from GE.

When I spoke to Rob Stevens, he had a question about whether Mitsui needed to
review the final drafts of the GE agreements. I don't know the resolution of
that issue.

As you know, the current arrangement with GE requires payment within 3 days
of signing of the contracts, which means we have to be prepared to assign the
contract, then wire the money from EEIM to Mitsui immediately so that Mitsui
can pay GE, and GE can refund ENA.  Has EEIM been funded yet and has Mitsui
bought in on the payment plan?

I do not know the status of the tax issues raised by Jeff. I would also like
to make sure that Jeff agrees with the mechanism of superseding the prior
agreement with GE.

Kay

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/06/2000 09:54
AM ---------------------------

jeffreye.smith@ps.ge.com on 06/06/2000 09:47:54 AM
To: Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc: jeffreye.smith@ps.ge.com, Brian.D.Barto@enron.com,
karl.siverling@ps.ge.com, David.K.Bargainer@enron.com,
john.schroeder@ps.ge.com

Subject: RE: Letter agreement

Kay,
I'm faxing to you the documents highlighted in RED, below.
So, it looks like we need to supercede these documents, along with the
assignment and assumption agreement.
I believe the entities I mentioned yesterday are still applicable.
If you have a different opinion, let me know.
Give me a call at 518-385-7722, and let's get the documents in condition to
be signed today or tomorrow.
Regards,
Jeff Smith

-----Original Message-----
From:   Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent:   Tuesday, June 06, 2000 3:44 AM
To:   karl.siverling@ps.ge.com
Cc:   Kay.Mann@enron.com; jeffreye.smith@ps.ge.com;
Brian.D.Barto@enron.com; karl.siverling@ps.ge.com;
David.K.Bargainer@enron.com; john.schroeder@ps.ge.com
Subject:   RE: Letter agreement

Thank you.  That would be helpful.
Kay

karl.siverling@ps.ge.com <mailto:karl.siverling@ps.ge.com>  on 06/06/2000
07:28:24 AM
To:   Kay.Mann@enron.com <mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com> ,
jeffreye.smith@ps.ge.com <mailto:jeffreye.smith@ps.ge.com>
cc:   Brian.D.Barto@enron.com <mailto:Brian.D.Barto@enron.com> ,
karl.siverling@ps.ge.com <mailto:karl.siverling@ps.ge.com> ,
   David.K.Bargainer@enron.com <mailto:David.K.Bargainer@enron.com> ,
john.schroeder@ps.ge.com <mailto:john.schroeder@ps.ge.com> ,
   jeffreye.smith@ps.ge.com <mailto:jeffreye.smith@ps.ge.com>
Subject:   RE: Letter agreement

The "MOU" consists of the GE proposal #80518 w/ offer letter of August 12,
1998, and J.M. Bollinger's (President, Cogen Tech) acceptance letter of
August 14, 1998.  These letters set the framework of the agreement,
including payment / termination schedule.  Invoicing & payments began in
September, 1998..and have continued on that basis until each of the
individual contracts for Linden & "Midwest" were consummated.  In Dec., 99,
at Enron's request,we allocated  funds paid to date to Linden and the "third
unit".  We'll forward copies of above.
Karl Siverling
-----Original Message-----
From:   Kay.Mann@enron.com <mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com>
[mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com] <mailto:[mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]>
Sent:   Monday, June 05, 2000 6:27 PM
To:   jeffreye.smith@ps.ge.com <mailto:jeffreye.smith@ps.ge.com>
Cc:   Brian.D.Barto@enron.com; <mailto:Brian.D.Barto@enron.com;>
Kay.Mann@enron.com; <mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com;>
karl.siverling@ps.ge.com; <mailto:karl.siverling@ps.ge.com;>
David.K.Bargainer@enron.com; <mailto:David.K.Bargainer@enron.com;>
john.schroeder@ps.ge.com; <mailto:john.schroeder@ps.ge.com;>
jeffreye.smith@ps.ge.com <mailto:jeffreye.smith@ps.ge.com>
Subject:   RE: Letter agreement

The collective memory at ENA is that there wasn't an MOU per se, just the
assignment and assumption agreement.
Kay

jeffreye.smith@ps.ge.com <mailto:jeffreye.smith@ps.ge.com>  on 06/05/2000
03:51:46 PM
To:   Brian.D.Barto@enron.com <mailto:Brian.D.Barto@enron.com> ,
Kay.Mann@enron.com <mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:   karl.siverling@ps.ge.com <mailto:karl.siverling@ps.ge.com> ,
David.K.Bargainer@enron.com <mailto:David.K.Bargainer@enron.com> ,
   john.schroeder@ps.ge.com <mailto:john.schroeder@ps.ge.com> ,
jeffreye.smith@ps.ge.com <mailto:jeffreye.smith@ps.ge.com>
Subject:   RE: Letter agreement

Brian,
I spoke to Karl today, and we tried to find the "MOU".  All we have found
was the "Assignment & Assumption Letter" you mention.  In that document, the
Enron and GE entities were; Enron Capitol & Trade Resources Corp. and
General Electric Company, respectively.
Regards,
Jeff Smith

-----Original Message-----
From:   Brian D Barto [mailto:Brian.D.Barto@enron.com]
<mailto:[mailto:Brian.D.Barto@enron.com]>
Sent:   Monday, June 05, 2000 12:45 PM
To:   Kay Mann
Cc:   karl.siverling@ps.ge.com; <mailto:karl.siverling@ps.ge.com;>  David
K Bargainer;
John.Schroeder@ps.ge.com; <mailto:John.Schroeder@ps.ge.com;>
Jeffreye.smith@ps.ge.com <mailto:Jeffreye.smith@ps.ge.com>
Subject:   RE: Letter agreement

I have a copy of the "Assignment and Assumption Letter"  where GE agreed
that Cogen Technologies could assign the rights to purchase the Units to
Enron Capital and Trade Resources, Corp.
The initials at the ECT signature block is Doug Pedigo's.
I have always been a little confused when Karl Siverling talks about
voiding
an
MOU, because I do not remember ever seeing an MOU for the Cogen Tech units.
Perhaps we could ask Karl to send us a copy of the document he intends to
void to make the process easier.


Today's IssueAlert Sponsors:

[IMAGE]

Are you looking to invest in, attract investors for, provide services to or
understand the business and technology dynamics of the hottest companies
emerging in the energy sector?   Attend the Energy Venture Fair, June 25 &
26, 2001, in Boston, MA and hear CEOs from 75 hot energy companies present
their business plans.  Complete event description available at
www.energyventurefair.com or call Nannette Mooney at (818) 888-4445, ext. 11.

Miss last week? Catch up on the latest deregulation, competition and
restructuring developments in the energy industry with SCIENTECH's
IssuesWatch

CORRECTION to 5/25/01 IssueAlert: The U.S. Senate has been evenly divided
between Democrats and Republicans since the November 2000 elections, not  for
seven years as was incorrectly stated in the column. We apologize for  any
misunderstanding that this error might have caused.

[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
May 29, 2001

EDF Pursues Italy's Montedison;
Lack of Reciprocity Still a Factor

By Will McNamara
Director, Electric Industry Analysis

[IMAGE]Power giant Electricit,de France (EDF) has sent shock waves through
Italian financial markets and government ministries by attempting to raise
its stake in electric firm Montedison to 20 percent from about 6 percent.
However, Romano Prodi, the European Union commissioner for competition, is
considering an intervention in the battle between EDF, the French electricity
monopoly, and the Italian government. The latter has passed an ad hoc law
restricting EDF to 2 percent of the voting rights for Montedison, the Italian
electricity supplier spun off by Enel.

Analysis: Once again, the issue of reciprocity has taken center stage in the
European power market, with EDF playing the staring role. For the last year
or so, as the European Union (EU) has enacted electric competition across the
Continent, France's EDF has taken advantage of competitive opportunities in
other European countries while resisting any penetration of its own market by
foreign suppliers. Although EDF has a presence in the United Kingdom through
its ownership of London Electricity, the French power firm has wanted for
some time to increase its position in Spain and Italy. However, the
neighboring governments continue to fight any expansion by EDF until France
reciprocates and allows further liberalization of its own market.

As I have mentioned before in this column, France has been criticized by
other European nations for delaying energy liberalization in its own country.
As a result, EDF (which controls approximately 90 percent of the French
electric industry) may not be allowed to make additional acquisitions abroad
until it further opens its own market to competition. To date, France has
only opened its power and gas markets by the minimum amount imposed by the
EU, and EDF has played a large role in this resistance. While other European
countries such as Germany have opened 100 percent of their markets to
competition, France has opted for a phased-in approach, opening a third each
of its power and gas markets by February 2003 and August 2008, respectively.
Thus, although other companies such as Spain's Endesa have attempted to push
through barriers to obtain entry into France, it is questionable when true
competition will emerge in the country.

Nevertheless, EDF has now set its sights on Italy through an expansion of its
holdings in Montedison, one of Italy's main electricity companies. Reports
are mixed about how much EDF currently owns of Montedison. EDF recently said
that its stake increased from 3.971 percent to 5.971 percent. However, other
reports have indicated that EDF already controls about 20 percent of the
capital assets of Montedison. Both increases in Montedison were made
recently, which EDF was forced to confirm to the Italian stock market
regulatory Consob. EDF has claimed that its holdings in Montedison were made
strictly as a minority financial holding to diversify the company's financial
assets across Europe. However, at the same time, EDF has also indicated that
any increase it makes in its holdings on Montedison would be for trading
purposes. In other words, EDF wants to control the generating assets of
Montedison for resale across Europe's wholesale market. Further, with a
20-percent stake, EDF would become Montedison's largest shareholder and a
major presence in Italy's power market even as France remains mostly closed.

EDF's argument that it has secured a stake in Montedison solely for financial
diversification purposes is not flying with the European Union or the Italian
government. The consensus across the Continent is that EDF is making a
strategic increase of its electric holdings and plans to make as many
additional acquisitions as will be allowed by EU regulators. In fact, EDF has
admitted that its strategy is to "make 50 percent of its turnover from
activities abroad by the end of 2005, compared with 25 percent currently."
Consequently, it is clear that the French power firm is looking beyond its
home country for expansion opportunities, and these opportunities typically
have been in distribution and generation assets. Moving forward, the company
has expressed an interest in expanding its trading operation

For instance, last month I discussed a report that EDF is preparing a bid for
the regional U.K. electricity company Seeboard, which is owned by American
Electric Power (NYSE: AEP). Serving about two million connected customers in
England, Seeboard owns, operates and maintains an electricity network of over
45,000 km (28,000 miles) of overhead lines and underground cables. An
acquisition of Seeboard would factor into EDF's overall expansion efforts in
Europe and be a nice complement to London Electricity, one of 12 regional
electricity companies in England and Wales, which EDF bought from Entergy in
1998. In addition, EDF has also made acquisitions in Sweden (Graninge) and
Germany (EnBW) and reportedly is Poland's largest electricity distributor.
These acquisitions were made by EDF International, which is wholly owned by
the French government, and thus subject to EU oversight. Perhaps due to EDF's
size and presence in Europe, these previous acquisitions were allowed without
a great deal of EU intervention. However, now that other countries have
voiced criticism of EDF and put pressure on the EU to intercede, it is
unlikely that further acquisitions will proceed without intense scrutiny.

As noted, trading appears to be the next wave of EDF's expansion efforts.
Toward this end, EDF partnered with Louis Dreyfus in 1999 to create an energy
trading company called EDF Trading. The various companies that EDF has
invested in across Europe support the company's efforts to both learn about
new competitive techniques and financially benefit when competition opens
fully across the Continent.

For its part, the Italian government has responded that it will block any
increase of EDF's ownership of Montedison, based primarily on the argument
that EDF is not offering the same opportunity for expansion in France.
Specifically, Italy is working on a decree that would freeze the voting
rights attached to the shares that EDF holds in Montedison. Further outlining
its position, the Italian government has said that Italy must protect the
imminent privatization of the power stations in the country that will soon be
sold by Enel, one of the country's main power firms. As Montedison will be
one of the main contenders of the assets owned by Enel, the Italian
government wants to block EDF from increasing its share in the company and
thus having access to additional power assets in Italy. For instance, Enel is
planning to sell Elettrogen, a generation company that produces about 15
percent of the production capacity in Italy. If EDF were to increase its
stake in Montedison before or after Montedison makes a play for Elettrogen,
then EDF, as a foreign entity, would gain a lock over the Italian power
supply market.

Italy's anti-EDF law is an interesting development, but it does not mark the
first such legislation that has been initiated across the Continent. Spain
also has created a similar law that is specifically targeted against EDF with
regard to the French company's pursuit of Hidrocantabrico, Spain's fourth
largest supplier. However, despite the efforts by Spain and Italy to restrict
any expansion of EDF, the laws, although they are already in place, may
ultimately be deemed anti-competitive and a breach of the Treaty of Rome,
which calls for unlimited freedom on the movement of capital within the EU.
Similar to how the Federal Trade Commission investigates anti-trust
allegations in the United States, any attempt to overturn the laws in Spain
and Italy would result in lengthy legal battles.

EDF also remains interested in the Spanish's largest power utility Endesa,
which is about the only foreign company that has been able to penetrate the
French electricity market (through a 30-percent acquisition of French
electricity generator Soci&eacutet,Nationale d&#39Electricit,et de
Thermique). Endesa, which recently terminated an attempted merger with
Iberdrola, Spain's second largest power firm, has been viewed as a takeover
target for larger companies such as EDF.

At last report, the EU Commission said that it would base any decision to
intervene in the battle between EDF and the Italian government on "how far
control was being exercised." In other words, EU intervention will be based
on how much foreign control EDF might wield in the Italian market with an
increased stake in Montedison. The fact that France remains resistant to
electric competition in its own country remains a key factor in this debate,
and it certainly adds heat to the criticisms leveled against EDF by the
governments of Italy and Spain.

An archive list of previous IssueAlerts is available at
www.scientech.com

[IMAGE]
The most comprehensive, up-to-date map of the North American Power System by
RDI/FT Energy is now available from SCIENTECH.
Reach thousands of utility analysts and decision makers every day. Your
company can schedule a sponsorship of IssueAlert by contacting Nancy Spring
via e-mail or calling (505)244-7613. Advertising opportunities are also
available on our website.
SCIENTECH is pleased to provide you with your free,  daily IssueAlert. Let us
know if we can help you with  in-depth analyses or any other SCIENTECH
information  products. If you would like to refer a colleague to receive our
free,  daily IssueAlerts, please reply to this email and include  their full
name and email address or register directly on our site.

If you no longer wish to receive this daily email, send a message to
IssueAlert, and include the word "delete" in the subject line.
SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts(SM) are compiled based on the  independent analysis
of SCIENTECH consultants. The opinions expressed in  SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts
are not intended to predict financial performance  of companies discussed, or
to be the basis for investment decisions of any  kind. SCIENTECH's sole
purpose in publishing its IssueAlerts is to offer  an independent perspective
regarding the key events occurring in the  energy industry, based on its
long-standing reputation as an expert on  energy issues.

Copyright 2001. SCIENTECH, Inc. All rights  reserved.


FYI

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jones, Robert W.- HR Exec
Sent:	Tuesday, December 04, 2001 8:49 PM
To:	Kitchen, Louise
Cc:	Kean, Steven J.; Steffes, James D.
Subject:	RE: NEWCO Regulatory List

Done.  Both called.  Susan will be in tomorrow and report to Jim Steffes.  Charles expressed some concern and will call Jim tomorrow to discuss role.

R-

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Tuesday, December 04, 2001 8:23 PM
To:	Jones, Robert W.- HR Exec
Subject:	FW: NEWCO Regulatory List

Please get those two people back.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kean, Steven J.
Sent:	Tuesday, December 04, 2001 3:41 PM
To:	Kitchen, Louise
Cc:	Linnell, Elizabeth
Subject:	RE: NEWCO Regulatory List

Charles Yeung and Susan Lindberg were not on your list yesterday and so they were let go.  Call me.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Tuesday, December 04, 2001 3:23 PM
To:	Kean, Steven J.; Steffes, James D.
Subject:	NEWCO Regulatory List

Regulatory

S. Montovano - E. Gas
J. Dosovich - W. Gas
C. Nicolay - FERC
Alan Comnes	West Power
S. Walton - E. Power
J Steffes
Charles Yeung	ERCOT
Susan Lindberg
Sarah Novosel	FERC

Are all of these people still here?  We obviously hope so, as we would like them for NEWCO


Leslie -

Thanks for the heads up.  I believe the way CL is set up, each annex to the
Electronic Services Agreement contemplates that it will, to the extent
necessary, be an amendment to the "Other Agreements," whether those
agreements are the master trading agreement, the general terms and conditions
or some other agreement that binds the parties.  Specifically for Confirm.
Central, the contemplation is that the Counterparty will have agreed to the
terms of the annex and the appropriate commodity specific exhibit prior to
being able to "e-confirm" through the Module.  Since the exhibit is intended
to address the additional terms applicable to confirmations for that
commodity, there would be no need to send out anything once the counterparty
"e-confirms" a trade.

From what you wrote, it sounds as though EnronOnline is agreeing with a
counterparty to send the GTC's applicable to the EnronOnline trade.  It is
not intended by the annex or the individual exhibits that CL will modify the
agreement between Enron and the counterparty as to the actual trade, only as
to the specific method of confirmation.  If it is done electronically through
CL, then only the terms of the module applicable to the electronic
confirmation will be put in force.

I will look at this a bit further, but am not sure there is really an issue.

Mark
Senior Counsel, ENA
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3940
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com

	Leslie Hansen@ECT
	12/07/2000 01:20 PM

		 To: Mark Greenberg/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Commodity Logic Issues

Mark:

I'm finalizing my comments and will forward to you by the end of the week so
that you will have them when you return on Monday.

I attended the NetWorks staff meeting this afternoon and wanted to apprise
you of a comment made by Louise Kitchen.  Louise is concerned that the
Commodity Logic legal documentation will require a revamping of the
EnronOnline system to some extent.  She noted that at least in Europe, we
have contractually obligated ourselves to sending a hard-copy of the on-line
GTC with transaction confirmations and that the Confirm Central module will
not comply with this requirement.  I'm not familiar with this issue insofar
as it relates to European counterparties.  I think you should discuss this
issue with Justin Boyd to get a better understanding.  However, I know that
in the US we have not contractually obligated any Enron entity to a specific
form of confirmation.

I think we should meet to discuss this issue after you have had a
conversation with Justin Boyd and then should set up a time to discuss the
issue further with Louise.

Let me know what you think.

Leslie


Please let Melinda know.  Don't forget to include PGE and New Power.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Winn, Melinda
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:25 AM
To:	Cook, Mary
Cc:	Ephross, Joel; Cash, Trey
Subject:	Master Netting Agreements

Mary, could you tell me which parties have executed the agreements and which are currently in negotiation?

	Thanks,
	Melinda


Correction --- this meeting is being held on August 8th (not Aug. 9th)  Sorry
for the mistake.

*********************************************************
Kristin J. Harrelson
Enron Broadband Services, Inc.
Procurement, Logistics, and Contracts
1400 Smith, Suite EB-4573A
Houston, TX  77002
Phone:        713.853.6814
Fax:        713.646.8582
Cell:        713.594.1385
*********************************************************

	Kristin Harrelson
	07/28/00 12:54 PM

		 To: Denise Bradley/Enron Communications, Eric Merten/Enron Communications,
Jim Mandis/Enron Communications, Michael Moore/Enron Communications, paula
corey/Enron Communications, richard weeks/Enron Communications, tobin
carlson/Enron Communications
		 cc: Diane Cutsforth/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Shirley
Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Risk and Purchasing Meeting

Due to time constraints on Mr. Kaminski's schedule during the time that you
all are in town from Portland, the meeting being held on August 9, 2000  in
EB-45C1 must be held to one hour (2:00-3:00pm)

Please have your questions, comments, and/or materials ready in advance and
expect this to be a fast paced meeting.

*********************************************************
Kristin J. Harrelson
Enron Broadband Services, Inc.
Procurement, Logistics, and Contracts
1400 Smith, Suite EB-4573A
Houston, TX  77002
Phone:        713.853.6814
Fax:        713.646.8582
Cell:        713.594.1385
*********************************************************


Here are my thoughts (in redline) for Seabron to consider.  On alot of this,
I don't have a strong opinion.  Seabron, please beef up the analysis related
to the cost/benefit of the dispatcher running the spot market.

Thanks,

Jim


I made one minor change.


Dear Colleagues,

We look forward to the first meeting of The Electricity Restructuring
Advisory Board.  The meeting will be held in Montreal, January 16, 2001
(commencing at 8:30 am), at the Commission for Environmental Cooperation
(CEC), 393 St-Jacques Street West, Suite 200.

The CEC will cover all travel expenses along with accommodations and per
diem. Kindly complete the attached "Confirmation of Participation" form and
return it to Leticia Villeneuve by Dec. 18, 2000 (lvillene@ccemtl.org or fax
514-350-4345) so that we can arrange your travel plans. Since the holidays
are almost here, please note that after this Dec 18 deadline, we ask that you
arrange your own travel/hotel and the CEC will reimburse you (for an economy
priced ticket).

Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions or
concerns.

Thank you,
Yolanda Clegg

Yolanda Clegg, M.Sc.
Environment, Economy and Trade Program
North American Commission for Environmental Cooperation
393 rue St-Jacques Ouest, bureau 200
Montreal
Quebec
CANADA         H2Y 1N9

tel: 514-350-4368
fax: 514-350-4314
yolanda@ccemtl.org

http://www.cec.org

 - Confirmation-english.doc
 - Confirmation - Spanish.doc


[IMAGE]	 	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]

             [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Upgrades  [IMAGE] DownGrades  [IMAGE] Coverage Initiated  [IMAGE] Stock Splits  [IMAGE] Buybacks  [IMAGE] Pos Pre-Announce  [IMAGE] Neg Pre-Announce     [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] Unsubscribe  [IMAGE] Update my Membership / Profile  [IMAGE] Forgot Username / Password  [IMAGE] Add / Edit Alerts  [IMAGE] View My Alerts   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]    [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] 	  As requested, your News Alert for YHOO  follows from EquityAlert.com.     SpotLife Announces Agreement with Yahoo! Mail; Create, Send and View Video E-mail through Yahoo! Mail   SAN MATEO, Calif., Nov 26, 2001 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- SpotLife, the leading provider of integrated personal video solutions, and Yahoo! Inc. (Nasdaq:YHOO), a leading global communications, commerce and media company, today announced an agreement to offer users video e-mail services through Yahoo!(R) Mail (http://mail.yahoo.com). The addition of video e-mail services will enable users of Yahoo! Mail to easily create and send personalized video e-mail messages to friends, family and colleagues virtually anywhere in the world.   "SpotLife's technology provides a significant value-add to the Yahoo! Mail service," said John Walsh, CEO of SpotLife. "Video e-mail offers Yahoo! the ability to provide their users with easy and reliable video e-mail capabilities, while ensuring that Yahoo! Mail maintains a superior service offering, and the best Internet video technology available on the market."   Under the agreement, SpotLife will provide video e-mail technology and service for Yahoo! Mail. The service enables Yahoo! Mail users to easily record video with a PC video camera, or upload video already existing on their PC. SpotLife's technology automatically compresses and uploads video messages to SpotLife's servers, eliminating the need to store large digital video/audio files on the end-users' PC. Recipients of a video e-mail receive a notification message containing a link to a Web page on Yahoo! Mail where the customer can readily view the video through the SpotLife Player. The videos are composed and sent directly from a Yahoo Mail user's existing account, and managed and stored by SpotLife. Whether consumers are using broadband or dial-up connections, the video e-mail service works with any Internet connection speed. All that is required to create and send video e-mail is a PC with the Windows operating system, an Internet connection, a PC video camera (or other video source) and a Yahoo! Mail account. Recipients of Yahoo! Mail video e-mails need only a Windows media player to watch video e-mails sent from Yahoo! Mail.   "We believe this new feature will provide Yahoo! Mail users with a unique new way to communicate with family, friends and business associates," said Lisa Pollock, director of Messaging Products for Yahoo!. "Our agreement with SpotLife further supports Yahoo! Mail's strategy to continue to develop and integrate innovative, new features that add real value to people's lives. We are also pleased to provide even more effective marketing services by offering rich media ads through this new feature."   The demand for Internet video technology continues to increase dramatically. Based on IDC Forecasts, approximately 60 million PC video cameras will be sold by the year 2005. This represents a significant market for the adoption of video e-mail services.   "Video e-mail is a great way for friends and family to keep in touch in an uncertain world," said Chris Chute, analyst, Worldwide Imaging Group, IDC. "The continuing popularity of PC cameras and adoption of new technologies will make it easier for this to happen."   About SpotLife  SpotLife is the leading provider of integrated personal video solutions enabling businesses to easily incorporate personal video into their Internet or wireless service offerings. SpotLife has developed a private label video publishing and delivery platform that allows organizations to offer end-users the ability to easily create, publish, share and view live or recorded videos -- anywhere, anytime. Through partnerships with Compaq, Kensington, Logitech, Philips Electronics and Xirlink, SpotLife's Personal Video Broadcasting service is currently integrated in 2 out of every 3 PC video cameras sold worldwide. This strong distribution base provides co-marketing opportunities for SpotLife's infrastructure partners to reach new camera buyers. SpotLife also offers a full-featured Personal Video Broadcasting site, www.spotlife.com, which provides the strongest proven and scalable infrastructure in the Personal Video Broadcasting industry.   Founded in July 1999, SpotLife is headquartered in San Mateo, California. SpotLife is privately owned, and funded by Atlas Venture, aventic partners (the venture arm of UBS), CMGI @ventures, Logitech and Philips Electronics. For more information about the company, please visit the company's web site at www.spotlife.net or contact Rick Mitchell at 650/356-6928.   NOTE: A video relating to this story will be available for     journalists to download beginning today at www.newstream.com     and at www.businesswire.com  CONTACT:          SpotLife Inc., San Mateo                   Rick Mitchell, 650/356-6928                   rick@spotlife.com                   or                   Fleishman Hillard for Yahoo!                   Melinda McRae, 916/492-5331                   mcraem@fleishman.com URL:              http://www.businesswire.com Today's News On The Net - Business Wire's full file on the Internet with Hyperlinks to your home page.  Copyright (C) 2001 Business Wire.  All rights reserved.  -0-   KEYWORD:          afxal CALIFORNIA TRACK INDUSTRY KEYWORD: INTERNET                   SOFTWARE                   ELECTRONIC                   GAMES/MULTIMEDIA                   E-COMMERCE                   TELECOMMUNICATIONS                   MARKETING                   AGREEMENTS                   PRODUCT                   PHOTO                   SOURCE:                   SpotLife    [IMAGE]    ***IMPORTANT NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER REGARDING THIS COURTESY EMAIL***  At your request, as a subscriber to our service, this email alert is being sent to you as a courtesy and is for information purposes only. We are a financial news re-distributor. We are not an investment advisory and do not purport to tell or suggest which companies you should monitor or which securities you should purchase or sell.   In addition, not withstanding our policy of prohibiting employees from buying or selling securities of an advertising company for a period of 20 days following dissemination of the advertisement, we may not be able to effectively monitor our employees to ensure compliance with the same. Consequently, there may be sales and/or purchases of such securities by our employees prior to, during and immediately following the dissemination of the advertisement.   Please note that (1) this email may not contain the full text of the press release issued by, or the research or other reports regarding, the Monitored Company; and (2) the text of the advertisement, the press release and/or reports were obtained from third party sources and were not written, generated or edited by us; accordingly, we make no representations or give any assurance as to the accuracy or completeness, nor have we conducted any independent investigations of, the disclosures regarding the subject matter of such releases and reports.   Please note that links to the advertising company and/or Monitored Company are provided for your convenience. We assume no obligation for the content of such sites.   All information contained herein should be independently verified by you with the advertising company or with Monitored Company or any other sources you prefer.   [THIS IS ONLY A SUMMARY OF, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO, THE "EQUITYALERT SUBSCRIBER AGREEMENT AND DISCLAIMER." PLEASE VISIT http://www.equityalert.com/home/disclaim.asp  FOR ACCESS TO OUR COMPLETE DISCLAIMER]        	  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Stock  Quote [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Stock  Chart [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Covered  Calls  [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Company  Profile [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Option  Details  [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Black  - Scholes [IMAGE]     [IMAGE]  Power Option PLUS Logo    [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]


Stewart:

I'd be glad to draft a "sample ISDA" for you and Jeff to use.  Please verify
that the type of counterparty you are looking at will be a
municipal/governmental.

On a related matter, we are still waiting to speak with Ed Sachs about the
credit rating for the City of Portland and should have the agreement to you
afterwards.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Stewart Rosman
	02/09/2001 12:02 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: ISDA/Financial Trades for Washington State PUD's and Muni's

Sara -

Jeff Fuller is interested in pursuing ISDA's with a number of his other
customers after a successful experience with Merced Irrigation District.  He
would like a generic ISDA to start with and hopes to negotiate four ISDA's in
the near future.  The purpose of the ISDA will be to hedge their price risk
once they get a piece of slice (this is a BPA plan to allocate slices of
their system to customers).  Feel free to call me if you have any questions
at 503-464-3810.

Stewart
---------------------- Forwarded by Stewart Rosman/HOU/ECT on 02/09/2001
10:45 AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Jeff Fuller <JFuller@prmllp.com>                           02/09/2001
08:06 AM

To: "'Stewart Rosman'" <Stewart.Rosman@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: ISDA/Financial Trades for Washington State PUD's and Muni's

Stewart,

PRM has 4 utility clients (Benton PUD, Franklin PUD, Grays Harbor PUD and
City of Richland) that will be purchasing BPA's Slice product beginning
October 1, 2001.  I want to get the process started to get ISDA's in place
between Enron and these utilities.  We are currently in the beginning stages
of discussing financial trades with their legal counsel.  Fortunately for
Enron, I think we can have one attorney represent all 4 of PRM's clients.
(FYI, that attorney will be Doug Rosenberg at Preston Gates & Ellis in
Seattle.)

To get started, I'd like Enron to forward to me copies of the ISDA agreement
that you would propose as the starting point for discussions.  I also ask
that you send me a list/examples of any other documentation Enron will
require (e.g., legal opinion, board resolution, etc.).  Please send just one
set of documentation at this point.  I want to get the basic legal review
process underway before you prepare four different sets of documents.  I'd
also like to request that when we get to the point of having Enron's
attorney walk through the ISDA with our attorney, that Enron use Sara
Shackleton.  Sara was great to work with when we went through this for
Merced, and I think she'd be extremely helpful once again as we venture into
new territory with these 4 utilities.

Thanks for your help.

Jeff


Please schedule and set up a conference call between Jon Chapman, Sarah Gregory, Michelle and me regarding the data protection policy.

Thanks,
--Lizzette


Trish looked at these and said that the Boston releases were done at Peak, but
the re-releases were done at Seasonal.  I would call Trish to discuss possibly
terminating and re-doing the re-releases.

Enjoyed lunch!   Steph

|--------+------------------------->
|        |          "Chris Germany"|
|        |          <Chris.Germany@|
|        |          enron.com>     |
|        |                         |
|        |          07/17/00 11:29 |
|        |          AM             |
|        |                         |
|--------+------------------------->
  >--------------------------------------------------------|
  |                                                        |
  |       To:     Stephanie L. Spencer/Mktg/TETCO/PEC@PEC  |
  |       cc:     "Brenda H Fletcher"                      |
  |       <Brenda.H.Fletcher@enron.com>                    |
  |       Subject:     Algon Billing Issues                |
  >--------------------------------------------------------|

Hi Steph, I don't know if this question should go to you.  If not, please
forward it on to the right person and let me know who that is.

The reservation volumes on the seasonal contracts do not look correct.  The
demand charge looks OK, its the demand volume which is not calculating
correctly.  And ENA has released this capacity to Energy Express effective
June
1.

Please look at the following contracts/deals.

Contract  Deal      Comment
779234         003589         Boston releasing to CES
771157         003668         CES releasing to ENA
771224         003786         ENA releasing to Energy Express

Contract  Deal      Comment
779233         003581         Boston releasing to CES
771156         003666         CES releasing to ENA
771225         003785         ENA releasing to Energy Express

Thanks.


Is  there pornography on your computer? Are you sure? Click  Here for a  FREE  system check! Clean it off!   http://www.contentwatch.com/spn


FYI

----- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 04/19/2001 04:04 PM -----

	Debra Perlingiere
	04/18/2001 11:53 AM

		 To: akoelemay@cogc.com
		 cc: (bcc: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT)
		 Subject: Spot Agreement

Dear Mr. Koelemay:

At the request of Mark Whitt,  I am sending you  the attached draft of a
Master Spot Purchase/Sale Agreement between Enron North America Corp. and
Citation Oil & Gas Corp.  for your review.

Please do not hesitate to give me a call with any questions you may have
regarding the enclosed.

Very truly yours,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Per my voice mail.  We should put a draft together today for Chris to
review.  He will start giving Merchant Energy pricing today but will not
transact until the end of the week.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 04/24/2001 11:52 AM -----

	Chris H Foster
	04/23/2001 06:49 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Confimation Template

Sara:

I am looking at a transaction with MErchant Energy Group.  We have an ISDA
with them.  It is a financial tolling deal where we will be a fixed price
payor for power and gas and we will pay them an option premium.  They
forwarded the attached pro forma to illustrate how the deal would be
papered.  Can you please review the attached and let me know if it looks OK
or what changes are required?  They indicated an interest to transact late
this week or early next.

C
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT on 04/23/2001
04:31 PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Brock, Travis" <BrockT@merchantenergy.com>
04/23/2001 02:30 PM

To: "Chris Foster (E-mail)" <chris.h.foster@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Confimation Template

Attached is a sample confirmation template for 100 MW's Sep01-Nov01.  We can
use this as a starting point.

 <<Swap Confirm Template.doc>>

Travis J. Brock
Merchant Energy Group of the Americas
brockt@merchantenergy.com
Phone: (410) 295-1734
Fax: (410) 295-1705

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain TRADE SECRET, PRIVILEGED
AND/OR CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended only for the use of the addressee.
If you are not the addressee, or the person responsible for delivering it to
the person addressed, you may not copy or deliver this to anyone else.  If
you received this e-mail by mistake, please immediately notify us by
returning the original message to the sender.

 - Swap Confirm Template.doc


Mr. Hall,
I have just reviewed the Merchant Portfolio Summary for 6/20 and have the
following questions:
 1) CALME shows an asset of $291.9MM  and APACHI shows an asset of $113.0MM
and they show no p&l for the year
  Is this possible in a world of changing interest rates and equity premiums
and commodity prices?
 2) India recently invested in an IPO (rediff.com) for which there was a
simultaneous DASH to buy and sell (sounds like a Merchant deal).
  Where does this show up?
 3) There are several bonds (publicly traded, registrered securities, housed
in our Prime Broker accounts) owned by various Enron entities
  that I do not believe are on the DPR.  Shouldn't they be? And if so, who is
deciding not to include?
Pls advise at your earliest convenience as you always do.
Thanks
Ted

	From:  D Todd Hall                           06/21/2000 01:16 PM

To: Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea V Reed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Carol Jean
Marshall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Raymond Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Donahue/HOU/ECT@ECT, L'Sheryl
Hudson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Monica Reasoner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hope Vargas/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Adarsh Vakharia/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph W Sutton@Enron, Michael S
Galvan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maria LeBeau/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wes Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, Thomas Myers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: MPR for 6/20/00


Jake -

The below response information is fine.  My only question relates to the type
of information we will be disclosing.  It is whether or not we want to,
instead of using the term "EnronOnline," use generic wording such as "object
codes to Net Work's online commodity trading platform," since they may not be
100% familiar with EOL.

Please let me and Tana know when the actual agreement has been provided so we
can review it as necessary.

Mark
Senior Counsel, ENA
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3940
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com

	Jake Staffel/ENRON@enronXgate
	04/13/2001 10:55 AM

		 To: Mark Greenberg/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Mike Haney/ENRON@enronXgate
		 Subject: NDA request for Coca-cola

Mark,

As we discussed earlier attached please find a copy of an NDA request from
Coca-Cola. (Exhibit 1).  We have reviewed it and modified it.  (Exhibit 2)
We hope to return this to Coke by the end of the day so that they can begin
processing their NDA first thing on Monday morning.  Please review these
documents and let us know what you think at your earliest convenience.

Thank you very much.

Jake

Exhibit 1

Exhibit 2


Aunt Helen Bartosh passed away Monday afternoon. She was 76 years old. The
rosary is tonight and the funeral is tomorrow at 10:00 A.M. She is Tracy's
and Joyce's Mom. Also Gary, Dennis and Charles. They use to come and pick
cotton with you'll when you were little.
   Also Billy Nemec passed away last week in Virginia. He was Uncle John's
and Aunt Tonys son. They buried him up there. His daughters live there. He
was your first cousin.
   All for now we are doing o.k. Got some rain this week should help the
crops.
   Dad and I send our love to all........MOM


Heather,

I put three swaps in on Friday at the wrong price.

Deal numbers are 660187, 660188, and 660183.  I corrected the prices this morning.

Net loss to STSW and gain to LTSW was no less than $102,000.00

Thanks,
Holden


Jackie,

Would it be possible for you to mark up the list of comments, highlighting
which are outstanding?  Marked by hand and faxed would be great.

Thanks,

Kay


You have received this email because you are listed as an alternate data approver. Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000081005&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000081005
Approver            : sandeep.kohli@enron.com
Request Create Date : 1/15/02 1:04:06 PM
Requested For       : naveen.andrews@enron.com
Resource Name       : \\enehou\houston\common\Research - [Read/Write]
Resource Type       : Directory


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 10/18/2000
10:19 AM ---------------------------

Chris Mahoney
10/18/2000 07:14 AM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, David J
Botchlett/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Ross Koller/LON/ECT, Tony O'Brien/LON/ECT, Pasi Hamalainen/LON/ECT@ECT,
Jason Harding/LON/ECT@ECT, Henkka Talvitie/HEL/ECT
Subject: pnl overnight loss of 6.7 mil for european distillates

some of this number is just due to the ipe gasoil mkt closing before the
brent.

I will highlight what is coming back in and where the money is lost by doing
an appx m-t-m where the mkt is at this moment.

ipegasoil  +1.4
physical gasoil      .90
heat      -.20
brent      -.30
dubai     - .50
pnl clawback      +1.3

we have been reducing the risk in the book on a daily basis as you can tell
from the var changes.  I need to go thru
with the person who does our book in houston how he arrived at last night
numbers.  the losses on physical gasoil
seem to great to me so hopefully the money coming back in will be greater
than my above estimate.


In response to your inquiry, Transwestern would first like to clear up the
terminology being used here.  As you know, currently SoCalGas doesn't assign
"primary rights" to deliveries off of any interconnecting pipeline.  The
establishment of tradeable rights for intrastate capacity is among the issues
currently under consideration in the GIR proceeding.   However, if what you
are asking about is what has been the historical or otherwise available
receipt capacity for Transwestern deliveries at North Needles, then let me
offer the following.

Transwestern has always operated on the premise that SoCalGas could
physically accept up to a maximum of 750 MMcf/d at its North Needles receipt
point.  Consequently, Transwestern has sold firm transportation to its
interstate customers for west flow deliveries to North Needles not to exceed
the 750 MMcf/d limitation.  Our west flow mainline capacity is 1.09 Bcf/d.

"Norman A. Pedersen" <napedersen@JonesDay.com> on 06/14/2000 08:12:05 PM
To: Susan.Scott@enron.com
cc: "ceyap" <ceyap@earthlink.net>

Subject: Re: Late-Filed Exhibit

_______________________________________________________________

This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read,
copy, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the
sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system.
Thank you.
_______________________________________________________________

To: Jeff Fawcett:

     Do Transwestern shippers to Transwestern's North Needles delivery
point have 1090 MMcfd of primary rights into ScCalGas, 750 of primary
rights. or some other number?


Make sure you tell Scwartzenberg. I hear he is kinda a pain in the ass.

	Andrew Edison@ENRON
	04/17/2001 07:51 AM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Robert Burns

You sent me a note yesterday asking what has happened to the Robert Burns
matter (the $11 million invoice).  I have talked to Mr. Burns' lawyer and
told him -- in essence -- that he is crazy and that we don't intend to pay
his client a dime.  We'll just have to sit back and wait and see if a lawsuit
is filed.

Andy


Kay,

Pursuant to your request, we have reviewed the project documents in
connection with possible sale of Midway Development Company in order to
determine whether, if the transaction were structured as a sale of assets,
consent would be required to assign any agreements or permits of Midway to
the purchaser.  The results of our review are summarized in the attached
chart.  As you will note, there should not be a problem assigning any of the
agreements or permits in connection with the contemplated sale, but certain
forms and applications under applicable statutes and regulations would be
required to be submitted in order to obtain consent from the relevant
governmental authorities to assign the permits.  However, various agency
representatives we spoke with indicated that it would be highly unusual to
deny permission to transfer.

If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact me.  I
hope you're having a good time in Belize.

Regards,

William ("Bill") Parish
King & Spalding
1100 Louisiana, Suite 3300
Houston, Texas  77002
Phone: 713/276-7413
Fax: 713/751-3280
E-mail: bparish@kslaw.com <mailto:bparish@kslaw.com>

 <<373302!.DOC>>

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete all copies of the message.


The following name correction was completed in GCP today:

CP ID		FROM						TO
160982		Malik Auto Center				George Bell Trucking Ltd., dba Malik Auto Center

Shortname changes will be coordinated with ERMS IT on Friday, November 30.

Thanks,

Ruby Kyser
Global Data Management
       713-345-8136
Fax 713-646-5797
ruby.kyser@enron.com


I received a message that there will be a surprise lunch for Rich Jolly on Friday, March 29 from 11:30 to 1:00pm in ECN46C1.  Rich is retiring after 35 years of service.  Everyone is invited.

Thanks, Kim.


I hope I can get to this today.

Maggie Li @ EES   01/18/2001 02:02 PM

To: Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Another recommendation letter?

Rob,

I'm sorry to bother you again. I just decided to add Yale to my list in order
to get more chance. Would you mind to write me another recommendation letter?
Yale asks you to describe specific activities or accomplishments which can
demonstrate my strength and weakness in a separate page in addition to the
ranking. I think this will demand more of your time to give some examples. I
can think of the examples for you if you need.

I would appreciate if you can take more time to write me this last
recommendation letter.

Maggie


Sorry to hear about your car, been there.  Are we doing anything tonight?  I
have not heard from anyone?   I would like to check things out at the church
in Bz, but confess I would want someone to drive, and knowing that area it
might not be the target rich environment we are looking for.  But, you never
know!

 I have plans to help you move next weekend if  you are still going on Sat.
I am anxious to see the changes in your new home.  If  I do not see you this
weekend, let me what time and where for Sat.

Dp


Rick, Ginger:

This is the email forwarded to Elizabeth on October 2nd, 2001. The outside services for Risk Analytics are indeed minimal.

Please let me know if you have any question.

Brgrds

AI

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ibrahim, Amr
Sent:	Tuesday, October 02, 2001 4:21 PM
To:	Linnell, Elizabeth
Subject:	Risk Analytics - Outside services

Elizabeth:

I do not have access to the spreadsheets.  Kindly consider $50K as a base case, $40K as conservative, and $30K is absolute minimum.  I hope that this is fine with you.  I am more than happy to populate the spreadsheet as soon as I get it.

Many thank

AI


The attachment below shows the West Power Trading Administrative team and
describes primary areas of responsibility.  The team is anxious to learn more
about Enron and how to support your needs, so please don't hesitate to
provide feedback on how to improve our level of service to you.  Your
patience is appreciated during the training phases for our new employees.

From today forward, please go to your designated assistant, as described in
the attachment, for your administrative requests.  As always, if you need
immediate help and your assistant is not available, please see me or another
member of our administrative team for assistance.

If you have any questions, please contact me.


Rick,

I was able to speak w/Greg and Mike McConnell on your Napa Valley
conference.  Unfortunately, Greg nor Mike are able to attend.

Many Thanks,

Liz Taylor

<RICHARD.WALKER@chase.com> on 09/11/2000 10:21:02 AM
To: greg.whalley@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Sept 20 / 21 Napa Valley

Greg -

Thanks for giving some additional thought to sending an Enron representative
to
Chase H&Q's Energy and the New Economy conference. I think your suggestion of
Mike McConnell is great  -- in fact I saw a piece on energy e-business in
Sunday's Chronicle in which Mike was heavily quoted albeit in his former role
as
CEO of Enron Global Technologies. I don't know Mike well but met him a couple
of
times in London in connection with a financing that Chase led on the TGTL
situation.

Anyway, you had asked about other presenters and format.

The format will be a panel dicussion during which each company will give a 10
-
15 minute business overview probably in a powerpoint format with books for
audience members to take away. Following the formal presentations there will
be
questions both from the floor and from the moderator to be addressed by all
panel members.

Assuming that EnronOnline is able to participate on the Energy Exchange panel
the moderator will be yours truly -- so I'll be serving up some softballs for
Mike.

The other confirmed panelists for the Energy Exchange session are:

Houstonstreet.com -- Howard Smith
Enemetrix.com - John Gaus
Downstream.com - John Ireland

We are expecting good attendance from industry (both incumbants as well as new
economy types) as well as from the buyside. So far there are over 100
participants and I expect we see a number of additional confirmations between
now and the conference.

Logistically, Mike would need to fly to San Francisco on Wed Sept 20 -- we
will
work with him on transport up to Silverado Resort in Napa Valley. The panel
will
be first thing on Thursday Spet 21 (probably around 9 am) after which Mike
will
be free to attend other conference sessions, play golf, tour wineries or
whatever.

The full list of sessions  includes:

Distributed Generation
Communications
B2B
Investor Perspectives
Energy Exchanges
Energy Retail
Venture Stage
European New Energy


how 'bout some last minute banking !


Its on the way.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Smith, Mike D.
Sent:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 4:18 PM
To:	Ring, Richard
Subject:	RE: Riverside County Waste Mgt

6468860  thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ring, Richard
Sent:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 4:18 PM
To:	Smith, Mike D.
Subject:	RE: Riverside County Waste Mgt

Mike,

What's your fax number?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Smith, Mike D.
Sent:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 4:10 PM
To:	Ring, Richard
Subject:	RE: Riverside County Waste Mgt

can you send me a copy of the K?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ring, Richard
Sent:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 3:47 PM
To:	Smith, Mike D.
Subject:	RE: Riverside County Waste Mgt

Mike,

The agreement covers multiple projects; to date there is only one project that has come on line.  For the one project that has come on line during the non-performance penalty could be in the range of $150,000 to $640,000, depending on the resoultion of the "effective online date" for said project.  The non-performance penalty was our strongest negotiating point in the ongoing effort to restructure the agreement as there is a potential for penalties for each project for each year of the contract.  The agreement contained some fundamenal flaws in order to be able to book the mark-to-market for the agreement.

I do not have a good handle of the "early termination payment" except to say that there are approxmiately 390,500 MWh's.  The average contract "fixed price" is $33.10 MWh.  I would need to find out what the nine year fixed price from the power curves is to estimate but my best stab would be to estimate the nine year fixed price to be $25.00 MWh which would result in "early termination payment" of approximately $3,200,000 ((390,500*33.10) - (390,500*25.00)).

Richard

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Smith, Mike D.
Sent:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 3:25 PM
To:	Ring, Richard
Subject:	RE: Riverside County Waste Mgt

Thanks.  Can you get a bead on the relative value of the ETP and the non-performance penalties?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ring, Richard
Sent:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 12:53 PM
To:	Smith, Mike D.
Subject:	RE: Riverside County Waste Mgt

Mike,

The "deal" is between EESI and Riverside County Waste Management Department (RCWMC) is dated April 17, 2000 and the term commenced on Sepetmber 1, 2000 and ending on September 1, 2010.  Based on our bankruptcy filing RCWMD stopped delivery of power on December 6, 2001; RCWMD invoiced EESI for power production for September 2001, 0ctober 2001 and November 2001.  I do not know if they were ever paid by EESI.  I do not know of any invoice for the first six days of December 2001.

EESI (myself) and EPMI (Chris Foster) were in the process of renegotiating the above referenced agreement with the plan for EPMI to take over the purchase of power and scheduling services with EESI being the purchaser of the "green tickets"  from EPMI associated with the power production.  There were some major issues to overcome in the renegotiation regarding the "fixed price", "volume committments" and "penalties".  I do not know who, if anyone, is currently looking at this agreement to make any kind of determination EESI's and/or EPMI's desires for the future of this agreement.

RCWMD sent various letters dated December 10, 2001, December 13, 2001, and January 8, 2002 requesting response from EESI.  The December 10, 2001 letter indicates that RCWMD considers the agreement terminated effective December 2, 2001.  I had previously spoke to you about this agreement in December 2001.

It is my opinion that we should not continue this agreement and we should consider RCWMD's offer to terminate the agreement with the exchange of the non-performance panalties for the termination payment.

Let me know if you need anything else.

Regards,

Richard

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Smith, Mike D.
Sent:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 12:36 PM
To:	Ring, Richard
Subject:	Riverside County Waste Mgt

Richard--what do you know about this deal?  Do you have paper on it?  Is this a purchase deal that we want?  Are we buying under it now?

The customer is pushing me to give them some answers.  Thanks.  MDS


This e-mail confirms the date, time, and location for the meeting between
Enron and Continental.

DATE:    Tuesday, December 12th

TIME:    1:30-2:30 PM

LOCATION:   Enron Building 50 M03

TOUR (gas trading floor EB 32 and Enron Online EB 27):   2:30-3:00 PM

The purpose for the December 12th meeting is to address three initiatives in
order of economic value:  (1) fuel management, (2) weather derivatives, and
(3) plastics hedging -- VaR analysis.


Susan:  This may look confusing!  It contains all of our "choices" for
preparing the documents.  See Part 2 (Tax Reps) and the end of the document
which has our "choices" of tax forms.

I thought it might be helpful to be very basic about withholding issues,
etc., why we need the tax reps, and what questions we could ask upfront about
a party that would help us select an appropriate tax module.  We tend to not
"think" and expect a party "fill in the blank" when we are preparing draft
documents.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Jeff / Michelle / Ken,

Here's the Daily Update for the 16th.
Enjoy your weekend everyone.

Suzanne

 - IGSUpdate.xls


Vern,

I am now responsible for publishing the EES Gas Position Report.   It seems
that the websave version that I received in the attached email is not updated
to publish the EES report.  Could you please send me an updated version or
let me know what I need to do so that I can publish this report?

Thank you,
Robin
x57478

Gabriel Monroy
10/20/2000 07:56 AM
To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Executive Reports Add-In

---------------------- Forwarded by Gabriel Monroy/HOU/ECT on 10/20/2000
07:54 AM ---------------------------
From: Vern Vallejo on 07/12/2000 06:04 PM
To: John Jacobsen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Richard/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mason
Hamlin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Groves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Confer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank
Prejean/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gabriel Monroy/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sally Chen/NA/Enron@Enron, Kristin Walsh/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christa
Winfrey/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Executive Reports Add-In

Attached is the latest version of the Add-In for publishing Executive
Reports.  It contains the "Pulp & Paper P&L", "Pulp & Paper Position", "Pulp
& Paper Price", "Emissions Summary", and "Natural Gas Net Fixed Price
Positions By Book (Ignores Correlation)" subroutines.

John Lavorato is expecting to see these publish reports in the updated viewer
tomorrow morning!

To use this latest version of the Add-In:

Close all instances of Excel.
Detach the attached websave2.xla file into the Microsoft Office's Library
directory.  Usually this is C:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\Office\Library
Launch Excel.
Under the Tools menu selection, select Add-Ins...
In the "Add-Ins available" list, look for "Websave."  If present, uncheck
it.  This is the old version of the add-in.
There should be a "Websave2" in the list.  This is the current version of the
add-in.  Check it and click the OK button.

I've also attached a workbook containing a buttons for the new reports that
you can copy and paste into your production workbooks.

Here are the named range values and the sheet names for the reports:

Named Range	Sheet Name
nr_NGFixPB  	Natural Gas Net Fixed
nr_EmSum  	Emissions Summary
nr_PPPL  	Pulp & Paper P&L
nr_PPPos  	Pulp & Paper Position
nr_PPPrice  	Pulp & Paper Price


Have any of the counterparties on the deals below invoiced us for any of the
additional volumes?

D

Clem Cernosek
12/27/2000 03:55 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mary Poorman/NA/Enron@Enron, Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: HPL Meter #980070 RUSK D/P - LONE STAR HPL

Daren:

During the period of 11/4/99 to 12/4/99, the above meter has recorded flow on
the following days:

 Days    Mmbtus

 11/4/99    2,813
 11/7/99    4,248
 11/8/99    2,287
 11/10/99        23
 11/24/99      100
 11/25/99      421
 11/26/99   3,611
 11/27/99      989
 11/28/99           7
 12/1/99    1,825
 12/5/99       205

                 30,287

Deal #127445 was at this meter for  only 1 day (November 3, 1999).  Deal
#129706 was at this meter for only 1 day (November 16,1999).  Deal #133219
was at this meter for only 2 days (December 1 & 2, 1999).  Currently, these
volumes are being booked under the HPL Strangers Gas Contract.  Logistics
needs either (1) have some or all of these deals extended, (2) new deal, or
(3) approval to write-off these volumes to Unaccounted for Gas.  (Please
print, sign, and return original to Clem Cernosek).

 ___________________________________________________
 Deal/Deal Ticket #/Customer (Seller/Buyer)

    OR

 ________________________________________________________
 APPROVAL to Write-off the volumes to Unaccounted for Gas Loss

Thanks, Clem


Peter -

Should Tana add you to her list of people who get the daily EnronOnline
customer list?  She sends it out to several lawyers to see if there is any
reason not to give access to the system.

Mark

	Peter Keohane
	Sent by: Sharon Crawford
	12/14/2000 11:09 AM

		 To: Lara Fields/LON/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron London - EOL Product
Control Group/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: PA Review Bank of Nova Scotia

Sorry for the delay in responding.  I have now reviewed this matter with Rob
Milnthorp.  The status of Bank of Nova Scotia's financing arrangements to our
counterparty Beau Canada Exploration Ltd., which was recently purchased by
Murphy Oil  Canada Ltd., remains unclear.  However, until such time as that
has been clarified, including the Bank of Nova Scotia's consent to our
security for our mark-to-market positions with Beau Canada (now Murphy Oil
Canada), Bank of Nova Scotia should not, at the request of Enron Canada, be
added to EOL.

Peter

To: Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron London - EOL Product
Control Group/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: PA Review Bank of Nova Scotia

Peter-

Can you please tell me if we must continue to refuse access to EnronOnline
for The Bank of Nova Scotia?  They have sent in another Password Application
to apply today.

If we must continue to refuse them, can you please tell me what message I
should convey to them?

Thank you,
Lara

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources
	Canada Corp.

	From:  Peter Keohane                           26/09/2000 00:17

To: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Lara Fields/LON/ECT@ECT, Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: PA Review Bank of Nova Scotia

Justin, Enron Canada is currently in an unresolved dispute with Bank of Nova
Scotia where from our perspective Bank of Nova Scotia has essentially been
telling us to shove off.  The dispute involves BNS's purported requirement to
consent to collateral security given to Enron Canada for physical and
financial trading positions with a counterparty known as Beau Canada.
Neither Bank of Nova Scotia nor any affiliate of Bank of Nova Scotia should
be traded OnLine and all trading ought to be monitored until such time as
this matter is resolved, and this should be expressly communicated to Bank of
Nova Scotia.  They can speak to me directly at 403.974.6923 or to our
President and CEO, Rob Milnthorp at 403.974.6714.

I am copying this memo to Bill Bradford and Mark Taylor for their information.

Justin Boyd
09/25/2000 08:36 AM
To: Lara Fields/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: PA Review Bank of Nova Scotia

Lara

Subject to approval from Peter (the C/P is a Canadian corporate), I approve
for all products except for US power, weather and credit

Peter - thanks!

Justin

To: Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT, Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, Debbie
Nicholls/LON/ECT@ECT, Gail Hill/LON/ECT@ECT, Enron London - EOL Product
Control Group/LON/ECT@ECT, Enron Europe Global CounterParty, Annette
Schneider/LON/ECT@ECT, ECT London Credit, Enron Europe Global Contracts and
Facilities, EOL Marketing Europe@ECT
cc:

Subject: PA Review Bank of Nova Scotia

Hello all,

The Bank of Nova Scotia would like to trade with us online.  They are in GCP
as #54087 and are existing customers of Enron Metals (Jimmy Gordon is the one
who got them to send in the PA if that helps!).

Could you please let us know your comments in the S: access Database?

thank you,
Lara
---------------------- Forwarded by Lara Fields/LON/ECT on 25/09/2000 14:52
---------------------------

London Fax System
25/09/2000 14:28
To: Enron London - EOL Product Control Group/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: New fax received (Likely sender: 0207 588 1542).

You have received a new fax from 0207 588 1542

The image contains 3 page(s).


In case you haven't seen this.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 01/08/2001 02:16 PM
---------------------------

Alan Comnes
12/28/2000 11:48 AM
To: mhain@enron.com
cc: smara@enron.com
Subject: CAL PX filing

I assume we do not want to intervene on this although if we do please note
the filing date.  CTS I believe is the block forwards portion of the PX.
Also this is a compliance filing to an earlier FERC decision.

GAC

From Janet Butler's weekly summary:

California Power Exchange Corporation, ER01-80-000 and ER01-81-000. Revised
Tariff Sheets to Amendment to Participation Agreement. On October 10, in
Docket No. ER01-80-000, the California Power Exchange Corp. (CalPX), on
behalf of its CalPX Trading Services Division (CTS), filed Amendment No. 5 to
streamline the Participation Agreement between CTS and its participants. CTS
also proposed to clarify that default chargebacks will be billed as
administrative fees and proposes a few non-substantive editorial changes.
Order issued November 21 accepting CTS, Amendment No. 5 as modified. Order
rejects (1) the proposed change to the Assignment provision and directs a
compliance filing removing it; and (2) the proposal to incorporate the
Information Guide and states to the extent that the Information Guide
contains terms and conditions significantly, affecting services or rates, CTS
should file to incorporate into the CTS Rate Schedule those portions of the
Information Guide that pertain to services and rates.  On December 19, CalPX
filed revised tariff sheets in compliance with the November 21 order.  Filing
noticed December 19.  Protests due January 4.


Next Steps --

1.	Leverage EES Customers Signing Post August 25 Contracts

The language in SB78 continues to hold the date for suspending DA as August 25.  EES signed a number of very large contracts that benefit important in-state businesses.  We are trying to establish a strategy around the following segments:

a)	California Restaurant Association
b)	CMTA via the Aerospace Industry
c)	Wal-Mart.

We need all of our customers to call (a) the Governor, (b) the key Legislative members, and (c) their trade associations.  Leveraging the trade associations is critical given CMTA's support for the bill.  We can release (very quietly) to influential persons Wal-Mart, Raytheon, and Northrop.

It is also critical that we try and contact someone from Boeing to get their read of the bill and its impact.  Our understanding is that they have recently signed a deal with another marketer and will be cut out by this Bill.  Any help in communicating with Boeing is critical.

Please let me know how best to approach the Calif Rest Association.  What should we do?  Is it better to have our customers call?

I will work up some talking points and phone numbers with Sue Mara to use in these discussions.

2.	Fight the CPUC on Retroactive Order

Sue Mara is working through AReM to convince the CPUC that their Proposed Decision would be illegal.  Continue to push on this front.

Thanks,

Jim


CP, i cant open and review.  Please get a copy of the goals.
m
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT on 04/03/2001
01:19 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  General Announcement @ ENRON                           04/02/2001
11:53 PM

Sent by: General Announcement@ENRON
To: All Enron Worldwide
cc:
Subject: Enron's 2001 Goals

Our vision to become The World's Leading Company positions our company for
great success this year and beyond.  Our success is dependent on execution.
With that in mind, we are making Enron's 2001 corporate and business unit
goals available to employees.

Please take a few minutes to review our 2001 goals on Enron's intranet at
http://172.28.92.190/bowne/    We believe they will help you gain a better
understanding of our vision for the company and will inspire you to identify
innovative ways to help your organization and Enron achieve our objectives.
We have a lot to accomplish this year, and with your hard work and
dedication, we can realize another year of stellar performance.


Randy, Scott Healy contacted Bob Kelly at Calpine about Calpine's potential
interest in Bridgeline and he found that Kelly and Cartwright had no real
knowledge of the potential deal.  Likely this originates at the local level
and is probably a long put.  Kelly was going to get back to Scott with more
detail over the next week.

Regards
Delainey


Ken and Mike...here it goes again since it seems like the first message did
not go through...best regards, Herbert Arturo Molina

------Original Message------
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <postoffice@staff.juno.com>
To: herbert_molina@juno.com
Sent: December 4, 2000 10:57:27 PM GMT
Subject: Returned mail: User unknown

The original message was received at Mon, 4 Dec 2000 17:56:55 -0500 (EST)
from herbert_molina@juno.com

   ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
ken_rice@enron.com
mike.mcconnel@enron.com

   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
.... while talking to mailman.enron.com.:
>>> RCPT To:<mike.mcconnel@enron.com>
<<< 550 5.1.1 <mike.mcconnel@enron.com>... User unknown
550 mike.mcconnel@enron.com... User unknown
>>> RCPT To:<ken_rice@enron.com>
<<< 550 5.1.1 <ken_rice@enron.com>... User unknown
550 ken_rice@enron.com... User unknown

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received: from cookie.juno.com by cookie.juno.com for
<"lzoMpIx+BCKlXfnnpCzNt62bH6ybg5lCW8Ub3ZFOHFGPiI0urBbj1mRepLDx1QLI">
Received: (from herbert_molina@juno.com) by m22.boston.juno.com (queuemail)
id FQGU6VNS; Mon, 04 Dec 2000 17:56:55 EST
To: ken_rice@enron.com, Jeff.skilling@enron.com
Cc: mike.mcconnel@enron.com, whalley@enron.com
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 17:58:07 -0500
Subject: Herbert Molina's current search campaign
Message-ID: <20001204.175809.169.0.herbert_molina@juno.com>
X-Mailer: Juno 4.0.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 0,6-7,14-15,21-22
X-Juno-Att: 0
X-Juno-RefParts: 0
From: Herbert Molina <herbert_molina@juno.com>

Gentlemen:
I good friend at Sun suggested me to contact  all of you at Enron  in
regard to the direction of my current searching campaign as  I have made
the decision to leave my post as Vice President and General Manager of
Network Associates Latin America and Caribbean. It is of my understanding
that Enron is undergoing a huge  internal transformation to become one of
the leading E-Commerce players worldwide.

Network Associates is the leading and independent provider   of total
security software solutions to monitor and protect telecommunications,
E-Commerce and internet applications worldwide. Since I was given the
mission to start  the region in 1996 I have been instrumental to
increase sales from 2M to 35M US in 4 years. I have been in charge of
supervising and managing over 100 employees across the region and the US
with complete P&L responsibilities.

Previous to join NAI, I worked  for Seagate where I had the
responsibilitity to set up the whole  supply chain in South Florida and
and across the region resulting in a sales increase from 25M to 125M US
in 4 years. With over 20 years of experience selling and transfering
technology internationally I feel proud of my record and accomplishments.

Should any of you be interested in talking to me about any opportunity
within any of your organizations, please do not hesitate to call me at
954-452-0664. Thank you in advance for your positive consideration. Best
regards, Herbert Arturo Molina

 - Herbert.PDF


Edison has dripped out information over the last 48 hours that reveals what the team had anticipated for some time:

Edison will pay ESPs what they are owed w.r.t. the negative CTC when they pay everyone else ("sometime in Q1'02").
However, Edison has told us and will tell ESPs today that they intend to very aggressively push the PUC to charge DA customers for "their fair share of the PX credit," since in their view DA customers (through the negative CTC) "contributed to the undercollection no more and no less than bundled customers did."
They claim they are "on the side of the angels" because it is an "equity" issue, and that allowing DA not to pay would be a massive "jailbreak."
Their calculation is simple:  If DA represents 10% of the load, then DA is responsible for paying down 10% of the undercollection.
Edison wants the undercollection recovered over the period of its settlement (they claim that, based on their calculations, they can recover it over 2 years).
In short, Edison is zero-ing out payables tied to negative CTC by forcing ESPs/DA customers to pay it back through rates over the next two years.
In a conversation yesterday, Edison said that it is not attempting to link the two.  That is, they are not making payment of PX-credit-related debt on agreement by ESPs to pay a portion of Edison's undercollection through rates over the next two years.
Presumably, in this way, Edison can say, "We said that we would pay our creditors, and we did.  It was the PUC who sets the rates and decided to claw back by charging ESPs/DA customers as part of the normal course of fulfilling its regulatory responsibilities."

Implications
Clearly negative from the perspective of expeditiously recognizing earnings for amounts Edison says it will pay us when it pays everyone else in Q1.
Equally important, it may increase significantly the risk of recognizing earnings for what PG&E will pay us.  If the PUC addresses whether ESPs/DA customers should contribute to pay down Edison's undercollection, it will likely also want to address the issue for PG&E.  We need to discuss the extent to which the PUC can meddle with PG&E in this regard given that PG&E is pursuing its work out through bankruptcy.

Impact on tomorrow's meeting:
I still think it is constructive to meet face-to-face with Edison tomorrow, but wanted to give folks the option of doing it by conference call:
We still have to determine whether we have agreement on what they owe us.  This includes calculations up to Jan. 17; the period from Jan. 17 to when we put our customers back on bundled service; and the period since they've been returned to DA status.
Since Edison claims they will pay everyone at the same time--sometime in Q1'02--there seems to be some value in determining what that number is, and getting the agreement in writing.
Second, it would be useful to explore with Edison why they have chosen to take an extreme, hardball stance on the issue (given that the PX Credit issues represents about $243MM/~$6B = 4-5% of the total debt).
In addition, it would be useful to let Edison know that they are in for a very long, protracted litigation struggle if, once they've paid us, they attempt to take it back through ratemaking shenanigans at the PUC.
In yesterday's conversation with Fielder, I told him that Edison is ensuring World War 3 and that they'd better prepare for it if they intend to pursue this unreasonable approach. However, I tried to keep things as cordial as possible in an effort not to close down communications altogether.
Other ESPs and DA customers are likely to oppose Edison's proposal.  Sue's informing the ARM coalition of what Edison's up to.


Thanks for your message.  I can meet with Jim Derrick on the 30th, and have
flexibility to attend training on either the 29th or 31st.  One consideration
is that Christian will be in St. Louis on the 31st and 1st; if Christian
wants to attend the training session we should hold it on the 29th.

Enron will pay for my travel expenses, yes?

Best,

Steve


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Legal - James Derrick Jr.
Sent:	Friday, January 25, 2002 1:52 PM
Subject:	FBI Investigation

During the course of their investigation, Special Agents from the Federal Bureau of Investigation will be taking documents they believe may be important for their investigation from employees' offices.  The FBI has agreed to return copies of such documents.

In addition, should you have an immediate need for a document requested by the FBI, please make a copy of the specific document and give the original to the FBI. Thank you for your cooperation.


IntercontinentalExchange
                                                                                Firm Physical Natural Gas Price Bulletin
                                                                                For Natural Gas Delivered on Thursday, November  22, 2001 thru Monday, November  26, 2001
                                                                                (Trade Date of Wednesday, November  21, 2001)
Click here to access index history .
                                                                                * volume represents sell-side only *

Region     Hub	High	Low	Wtd Avg Index	Change ($)	Vol (mmBtu)	Hub Name
 LOUISIANA
    ANR SE	          $2.0100	          $1.6000	          $1.8645	-    .7481	       1,068,000	American Natural Resources Pipeline Co. - SE  Transmission Pool
    Columbia Onshore	          $2.0600	          $1.6300	          $1.8317	-    .6560	       1,342,500	Columbia Gulf Transmission Co. - Onshore Pool
    Henry Hub	          $2.2450	          $1.6700	          $1.9115	-    .7065	       5,318,000	Henry Hub tailgate - Louisiana
    NGPL LA	          $1.9800	          $1.6300	          $1.8028	-    .7152	         935,500	Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America, Louisiana Pool
    Tenn 500L	          $1.8800	          $1.6025	          $1.7718	-    .7577	         603,000	Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.-Zone L, 500 Leg Pool
    Tenn 800L	          $1.9100	          $1.6000	          $1.8127	-    .6713	         775,500	Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.-Zone L, 800 Leg Pool
    TETCO ELA	          $2.1700	          $1.6300	          $1.8862	-    .7131	         610,000	Texas Eastern - East LA
    TETCO WLA	          $2.0000	          $1.6100	          $1.7888	-    .8088	         946,000	Texas Eastern - West LA
    Transco 65	          $2.1100	          $1.7200	          $1.9390	-    .7366	       1,040,500	Transco - Station 65
    Trunkline ELA	          $1.9600	          $1.6000	          $1.8091	-    .7390	         369,500	Trunkline Gas Company - East Louisiana Pool
    TxGas SL	          $2.1500	          $1.6700	          $1.8971	-    .7273	         993,000	Texas Gas Transmission Corp.-Zone SL FT Pool
 MIDCONTINENT
    MichCon, citygate	          $2.2500	          $2.0000	          $2.1075	-    .6977	         977,000	Michigan Consolidated
    NGPL Midcont	          $1.8400	          $1.5800	          $1.7032	-    .7773	         764,500	Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America, Mid-Continent Pool
    NGPL Nicor, citygate	          $2.1650	          $1.7475	          $1.8816	-    .7266	       2,890,000	Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America, Nicor Citygate
    NGPL NIPSCO, citygate	          $2.0850	          $1.7900	          $1.8770	-    .8610	         450,000	Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America, Nipsco Citygate
    NNG Demarcation	          $1.9700	          $1.6700	          $1.7476	-    .7355	         907,500	Northern Natural Gas, Demarcation Pool
 NORTHEAST
    Columbia TCO	          $2.1000	          $1.6800	          $1.9483	-    .7804	         772,500	Columbia Gas Co. - TCO Pool
    Dominion So.Point	          $2.3800	          $1.8400	          $2.1367	-    .7606	         997,000	Dominion - South Point
    TETCO M3	          $2.3100	          $1.9200	          $2.1651	-    .8869	         831,500	Texas Eastern - M3 Zone
    Transco Z-6 (NY)	          $2.4700	          $2.1500	          $2.3261	-    .9184	         725,500	Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. - Zone 6 (NY)
 WEST
    El Paso non-Bondad	          $1.6500	          $1.3200	          $1.4438	-    .9084	       1,081,500	El Paso - San Juan Basin, Blanco Pool
    Huntingdon/Sumas	          $1.9000	          $1.5000	          $1.6757	-    .7201	         732,000	Westcoast Energy & Northwest Pipeline Corp.
    Opal	          $1.6300	          $1.3200	          $1.4566	-    .7948	       1,024,000	Opal
    PG?Citygate	          $1.8500	          $1.6000	          $1.7012	-    .8513	         980,000	PG?- Citygate
    SoCal Border	          $1.8200	          $1.4500	          $1.5886	-    .9707	       1,145,000	Southern California Border Points (Ehrenberg,Topock,Needles)
 WEST TEXAS
    El Paso - Keystone	          $1.8500	          $1.4500	          $1.5963	-    .8563	       2,508,500	El Paso - Keystone Pool
    Waha	          $1.9000	          $1.5500	          $1.6598	-    .8520	       1,445,000	Waha Hub - West Texas

                                                                                Includes all firm physical fixed price trades done from 7 AM to 11:30 AM Central Prevailing Time on the trade date specified for natural gas delivered on the specified date(s).
                                                                                IntercontinentalExchange is the world's most liquid trading platform for over-the-counter energy and metals.  Active markets include North American power and natural gas, global crude and refined oil products, and precious metals.  Traded instruments include forwards, swaps, and options.
In order to receive the proprietary information contained in this email, you acknowledge and agree that you shall not further disseminate the IntercontinentalExchange Market Data contained herein to any person or entity without the express written consent of IntercontinentalExchange.    Furthermore, you acknowledge that (1) IntercontinentalExchange has exclusive and valuable property rights in this data; (2) IntercontinentalExchange's data is being made available to you only for your own business or personal activities; and (3) you cannot communicate the data, in any form, to any other person or entity without the express written consent of IntercontinentalExchange.
This data is provided to you free of charge.  IntercontinentalExchange reserves the right to cancel this service at any time for any reason or no reason at all.
You agree that IntercontinentalExchange does not make any representations or warranties, express or implied, with respect to the data.
To become an Exchange Participant or inquire about the indices, please contact sales@intcx.com .
To unsubscribe from this service, click here unsubscribe .
                                                                                ?Copyright IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. 2001, All Rights Reserved.


Attached are the Management Summary and Hot List that will be presented in
Monday morning's staff meeting.  Please contact me if you have any
questions/comments.

Thanks,
Jeff Smith
x39859
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Smith/HOU/ECT on 09/29/2000 03:41 PM
---------------------------

	From:  Patricia Anderson                           09/29/2000 03:40 PM

To: Jeff Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Hot List & Mgmt Summary 9/28/00

For Distribution:

Thanks,
Patricia


Dear Mr. McBride,

Thank you for the invitation.  Your e-mail doesn't indicate what date you
will be meeting with Mr. Carter; however, Mr. Skilling is traveling and will
be out of the office until Thursday, March 29.  Therefore, on behalf of Mr.
Skilling, I am declining his attendance.

Regards,
Sherri Sera
Assistant to Jeff Skilling
713.853.5984
713.646.8381 (fax)
sherri.sera@enron.com

"Kenny McBride" <mcbride@fms2000.com> on 03/12/2001 11:57:44 AM
To: <Jeff.skilling@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Financial Market Solutions

Dera Mr. Skilling,

Just a short e-mail to invite you to a meeting that I will be having with
Carl Carter in your on-line development team at 1.00pm on the 27th floor in
your offices located at 1400 Smith.

Financial Market Solutions (FMS) is a leading financial software company
located in Bellevue, Washington. The company is dedicated to the development
and implementation of Internet-based trading solutions for institutions in
the global financial marketplace.  The central component of all FMS
solutions is the Universal Trading Platform (UTP), which is a dynamic
web-based platform that enables unlimited numbers of simultaneous users to
access the system and execute trades on a fully automated basis. This basic
premise distinguishes FMS from other solution providers and gives our
clients the ability to more effectively manage the liquidity of multiple
users, trading over the Internet on a single platform. The UTP has been
fully developed as a complete Foreign Exchange dealing system, however, the
same platform can be used for transactions in any tradable financial
instrument.

FMS has employed a team of expert software designers and technicians as well
as experienced professionals from the financial markets, who together have
designed and developed the UTP to transform the way the FX product is
delivered to end-users. The platform is equally suited to the needs of large
institutional users as well as retail investors. The FMS system, using the
latest technology, is the most advanced on-line trading system available
today and will likely shape the FX business model of the future.

We have made some majorprogress over the last 15 months and are poised to
announce some key relationships that will have a mojor impact in the FX
industry.

I understand that you are very busy, and that this invitation is unsolicited
but as they say nothing ventured nothing gained.

Kind Regards,

Kenny McBride
V.P. Marketing
Financial Markets Solutions, Inc.
2820 Northup Way, Suite #201
Bellevue, WA  98004
U.S.A.
Office: 1-425-827-1262
Fax:    1-425-827-3432
Cell:   1-425-941-3725


CALENDAR ENTRY:	REMINDER

Description:
	Russell on call

Date:		6/11/2001
Time:		8:00 AM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Stacey W White

Detailed Description:


-----Original Message-----
From: Bagwell, Jennifer J
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 4:46 PM
To: Wenz, Michelle; Ortiz, Frances; Scott, Susan M.; Jenkins, Beth;
Capestany, Mari; Hightower, Jill; Zimmerman, Sam; Baukney, Scott; Quinn,
Kristin
Subject: FW: Enron Board of Directors

-----Original Message-----
From: Emmons, Suzette
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 4:31 PM
To: McClain, Jennifer; McCarroll, Zachary; Peters, Elizabeth; Wood,
Brian; Kistler, Dave; Barnes, Corbin; Terp, Brian; Vicens, Carlos;
Bagwell, Jennifer J; Erwin, Ben
Subject: FW: Enron Board of Directors

I love cookie monster!!!


Hi Shirley,

 This email is in reference to your vmail regarding my rescheduling my
meeting on tomorrow at 2 pm with Vince.  That is fine with me because the
Credit guys (Craig Chaney and Jeff Kinneman) have had a change in strategy.

 They have asked us to take some time to evaluate Moody's Riskcalc software.
Therefore I have had to put the Duffie project on hold for the last few
days.  However I am about two thirds through the Duffie documents and will
resume studying them as soon as I get through the lengthy RiskCalc documents.

 Let me know if he still wants to meet later in the week

Thanks,
Iris.


who is going besides the people on the e-mail?

To: val.generes@ac.com, Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Randy Bhatia/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Rockets

We are done.  7 tickets in nosebleed.  Cost is $15 each.  Plan to meet me no
later than 7:15 outside the Compaq Center's ticket window.


Well, this would seem to indicate one of two things: either Hertzberg's is
now an absolute lost cause, or it's more urgent than ever to have Ken Lay
talk to him.  Given the situation, it would still seem prudent to have Ken
Lay talk to the Speaker.

Best,
Jeff

	Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>
	02/20/2001 09:12 AM

		 To: Rick Shapiro <rshapiro@enron.com>, Jim Steffes
<james.d.steffes@enron.com>, Jeff Dasovich <jdasovic@enron.com>, Paul Kaufman
<paul.kaufman@enron.com>, Jeff Dasovich <jdasovic@enron.com>, Sandra McCubbin
<Sandra.McCubbin@enron.com>, "Harry.Kingerski@enron.com"
<Harry.Kingerski@enron.com>, Hedy Govenar <hgovenar@govadv.com>, Bev Hansen
<bhansen@lhom.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: MESSAGE POINTS - CONFIDENTIAL

The following message points are being circulated by Assembly Speaker Robert
Hertzberg.  These are very confidential and should not be distributed.

Deregulation has been a failure of epic proportions, and Californians are
hurting because of it.

This is bigger than politics. People have energy bills they cannot afford.
Rolling blackouts threaten our economy - as well as the safety of our people.
We cannot allow this to continue.

This is not a bailout, it's a lifeboat for consumers. We support the
Governor's plan as a framework for negotiations with the utilities.

The state purchase of transmission lines -- at the right price and under the
right terms - will restore a measure of control to a system that is out of
control.

Our goal continues to be restoring reliable, reasonably priced power to all
of California.


Two agreements have been negotiated with Siemens as part of the plant
turnover for Provisional Completion Phase III on oil: 1) the EOT Claim
Agreement between Siemens and SCC and 2) modifications to the TAA between
Siemens and EPE.

The changes which the lenders should review are as follows:

EOT Claim Agreement

14 Day Availability Test with respect to Provisional Completion Phase III on
oil, on a look-back basis over 6 months, required as a specific performance
requirement
After PC on oil, Siemens can demobilize
Compensation for commissioning on oil $5,720,000; $30,000 per day for owner
delay
Bonus of $15,000 per day that PC achieved before 17 Feb
Phase III Substantial Completion on gas
60 days prior written notice on gas availability
If sound level guarantees demonstrated on oil, only need to demonstrate far
field sound on gas
Owner must operate and maintain per O&M manuals and industry practices on
oil; if not, owner must correct items materially affecting Contractor's
commissioning obligations
Performance guarantees remain in tact per EPC
Long stop date on Phase III Substantial Completion on gas of 31 Dec 01
Substantial Completion on gas - punchlist limited to deficiencies from Work
performed to achieve Substantial Completion on gas
Risk of Loss remains with owner during commisioning on gas
Siemens agrees to enter into negotiations to provide operational assistance
Degradation - agree to use curves with credit to owner for degradation during
commissioning
Compensation for commissioning on natural gas $1,220,000 lump sum; $20,000
per day for owner delay
Warranty - 6 months after Provisional Completion on oil
Option to buy extended warranty for up to 6 months at $175,000; must elect 60
days prior to expiration of Primary Warranty Period
Performance LD's on gas per the EPC contract with first $4,000,000 forgiven
by owner
Delay LD's on gas do not start until 60 days after performance test on gas
Payments to be paid (including EOTof $5,720,000): 15 Feb  $5,446,141; 28 Feb
$14,353,401 with offset of $4,000,000 for Phase I LD payment due from Siemens
to SCC
Late payment interest rate of 14%

TAA Agreement

Effective date Provisional Completion Phase III on oil
No 12 month look back
12 month Initial Guarantee Period, with the clock suspended for gas
commissioning unless owner delay.

Additional Insurance

In order to provide the lenders an adequate warranty period on gas (if there
are additional delays on the P/L) our Insurance group has  indicated that we
will have no problem obtaining 12 months renewable business interruption
insurance when we go operational on gas.  This should solve the issue over
the revised warranty with Siemens because it covers defects, design, and
workmanship on the turbines and includes lost profits, etc.  Incidentally,
for insurance purposes the turbines are designated DE3 which is not a new
technology designation.   The duration of BI coverage is 18 months per event
with US$150,000 deductible.
Typically we will always have this coverage in place but if their is a
supplier warranty then the party providing the warranty pays ahead of the
insurer.  In the case where the supplier does not pay or the warranty has
ended then the insurer is the primary.

We will need to execute these agreements immediately.  Please advise with
your thoughts as soon as possible..


As a follow up to my message yesterday, I have talked to George McClellan who
assured me that he is taking things in India slowly and that no coal
transactions will be taking place in the near term.

I also talked to Bill Bradford who has been in discussions with the office
regarding counterparty credit.  However, nothing has been formalized.

Regards

Shona


Attached is an updated Interstate Pipeline Capacity to California Report with changes and additions highlighted.  gh


Here is a slide that should help you out.  Let me know if you need anything
else.  Thanks
Ben


Dziekuje za szybka  odpowiedz. Czy mozliwa jest platnosc czekiem?

Jako alternatywne rozwiazanie prosze podac mi cene w zlotych i moja rodzina w
kraju
dokona przelewu.

Prosze o kopie odpowiedzi na adres:  vkaminski@aol.com.

Dziekuje.

W. Kaminski

"Wydawnictwa Naukowo-Techniczne" <marketing@wnt.com.pl> on 01/19/2001
10:09:27 AM
To: <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: zakup ksiazki w WNT - "Inzynieria finanasowa"

Uprzejmie informuje, ze ksiazke wyslemy po  wplynieciu na nasze konto
odpowiedniej kwoty. Kwota ta zawiera wartosc ksiazki  (13,75$), koszty
bankowe (5$) oraz koszty pocztowe (6,5$ lub 11 $).
- Przy przesylce droga morska prosze wplacic  15,25 $
- Przy przesylce lotniczej prosze wplacic  29,75$
Nietety, nie mamy mozliwosci technicznych  pobrania oplaty karta kredytowa.
Fakture wysylam poczta.
Nasze konto: PBK S.A. III  O/Warszawa
????????????????????11101024  - 401020003963
Nazs adres: Wydawnictwa Naukowo-Techniczne,  Mazowiecka 2/4, 00-048 ??? ????
Warszawa,  Polska
Serdecznie pozdrawiam
Grazyna Piesniewska