I moved the Cannon sale volumes from #170335 to #529753 effective 12/14/00.
You will need to re-nom #529753 for all prior days at zero and then allocate
volumes at each meter from the old deal to the new deal.  Let me know if you
have any questions.

D

Mary Poorman@ENRON
12/14/2000 07:28 AM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: cannon assignment

Daren,

Should I change the counterparty on this sale, or is that handled by
marketing?  Also, we may need to look at changing the Storage Agmt.   Please
advise.

Mary
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Poorman/NA/Enron on 12/14/2000 07:26
AM ---------------------------

Julie Meyers@ECT
12/13/2000 05:12 PM
To: Mary Poorman/NA/Enron@Enron, Jackie Young/HOU/ECT@ECT, Aimee
Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: cannon assignment

Has the volumes for the deal below been nomd' yet under the new deal.  Credit
is having a cow because they are showing exposure still under Cannon.  Is
there a way that we can get this done tomorrow?

Julie

---------------------- Forwarded by Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT on 12/13/2000 05:05
PM ---------------------------

Julie Meyers
12/12/2000 05:03 PM
To: Mary Poorman/NA/Enron@Enron, Jackie Young/HOU/ECT@ECT, Aimee
Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: cannon assignment

---------------------- Forwarded by Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT on 12/12/2000 04:58
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Robert Cotten                           12/12/2000 03:29 PM

To: Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: cannon assignment

Julie,

Cannon is not a wellhead producer.  The meters below are assigned to the
following individuals:

Meter #  Scheduler

68  Mary Poorman
4132  Jackie Young
1040  Aimee Lannou
1606  Mary Poorman

These schedulers should be advised of the changes.

Bob

Julie Meyers
12/12/2000 01:49 PM
To: Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristen J Hanson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: cannon assignment

New deal 529753.

Robert, please do your magic.

Kris, I'm not sure who in your group this should go to, this is a sale.

Julie

Brant Reves
12/11/2000 12:24 PM
To: Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: cannon assignment

The trades below were originally executed between HPL and Cannon Interests
Houston per terms of a specific Master Physical Agreement.  After recieving
back executed documentation, we are ready to have the trades offically moved
within the various Enron capuring systems from Cannon to Kinder Morgan Texas
Pipeline, Inc. per the terms and conditions of the recently executed Master
Physical Agreement between HPL and Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline, Inc.

First, here are the TAG Nos. of the trades we wish to have assigned.

NU2813
NA0376

Second, several trades are listed within a ERMS book called:  P A M
These trades show a 12-31-00 expiry and their Nos. are:

522284
830689
892696
904035
904276

I am not sure what these numbers are.  But, could you move them as well.

Thanks for your help.

brant


Ramona, Jerry, and Perry,

Darrell will be out Thursday afternoon.  Are you all available Friday afternoon at the same hours - 1:30 to 3pm?  Thx, Jim

 -----Original Appointment-----
From: 	Schoolcraft, Darrell
Sent:	Wednesday, January 23, 2002 7:01 AM
To:	Studebaker, James
Subject:	Tentative: Updated: CAS overview with Ramona
When:	Thursday, January 24, 2002 1:30 PM-3:00 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where:	TBA

I will be out Thursday afternoon.  How about Friday sometime.

ds


Richard, attached are the most recent labels for Massachusetts.  If you could review when you get a chance -- I will be in on Wednesday, January 2 and Thursday, January 3 in the afternoon, maybe we can discuss changes at that time, unless we are no longer doing business in this state??

Thanks for your help.

Christy


I am arriving early to attend a meeting with our copywriters at 11am - please
feel free to attend

Its with David MIckleberg (212 468 3038) at DMBB Advertising, 7th Floor, 1675
Broadway (between 52nd and 53rd St) at 11am.

Following this we move to Sullivan & Cromwell at 14:00.  We (myself and Dave)
are scheduled to return to Houston on the 19:45 CO1927 from La Guardia.

Please give me a ring - I have a Skilling Business Review this morning which
should be over mid afternoon - but I'll ring you at 8:15 your time (just in
case your email is still not working).

L


Today we announced the appointment of Jeff McMahon as Enron's chief financial officer.  In my continued discussions with the financial community yesterday and today, it became clear that this move was required to restore investor confidence.  Jeff has unparalleled qualifications and a deep and thorough understanding of Enron.  He is already on the job and hard at work on the issues before us.  Andy Fastow will be on a leave of absence from the company.

Jeff had been serving as chairman and CEO of Enron Industrial Markets. He joined Enron in 1994 and spent three years in the London office as chief financial officer for Enron's European operations.  Upon returning to the U.S., Jeff was executive vice president of finance and treasurer for Enron Corp.  In 2000, he was named president and chief operating officer of Enron Net Works.

I know all of you are concerned about the continuing decline in our share price.  I am too, and we are working very hard to turn it around.  Appointing Jeff as CFO is one important step in that process.  But most of the solution involves just continuing to do our jobs with excellence.  The fundamentals of our business are strong, and I think the market will begin to see that as we continue to perform.

Please join me in giving Jeff your full support, and thank you for all of your continued hard work.


Here it is.       dedeutsch@duke-energy.com

	Janel Guerrero@ENRON
	05/12/2000 12:52 PM

		 To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject:

Hi.  Will you send me "Movieline Dave's" email address?  I'm trying to put
together a happy hour for next week and I want to include him so he and Lara
can meet.  (Although I don't think the two of them are really going to dig
each other very much).  Oh well, it's a good excuse to drink.

thanks.


Paul Seymour
508 Spruce St
Aptos, CA 95003
paul@psd7.com

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you
made from selling Enron stock before the company
declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee
Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's
employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide
relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't
afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made
millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers
and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of
Enron's employees were financially devastated when the
company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans
were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit
during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result,
there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay
their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is
bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million
worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the
company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this
money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those
Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Paul Seymour


You are invited to attend
Isuzu MS150 Bike Tour
Media Day

Monday, March 20, 2000
11:30 am - 1:00 pm
Quebedeaux Park
Adjacent to the Family Law Center
1115 Congress @ San Jacinto in downtown Houston

We need your help in spreading the word abou the Isuzu MS150.  Your story
could go a long way in driving up attendance and generating pledges.  The MS
Society is hosting the MS150 Media Day for journalists from Houston to Austin
in order to encourage their coverage of this spectacular event.  The more
people that know about the Bike Tour, the more that participate.....and
ultimately the more funds that are raised to unravel the mysteries of
multiple sclerosis.  We would like you on hand to share your story about why
you are riding the MS150 or past experiences on the Tour.  All we ask is that
you stop by Quebedeaux Park Monday, March 20, and if possible, wear your bike
jersey.  It is a casual, outdoor event and lunch  will be provided.  We will
also have training tips, cycling pros and veteran advice available - you
can't lose!

It will be a fun time for all and a great way to gear up for this year's
event.


Don,

What time are you getting married on September 22nd? Is the trip to Mexico
still on and if so, what is the date for that and who do I need to contact
for details? Also, do you have Travis's phone number so I can get a resume
from him to show to Duke Human Resources?

Sorry about the question barrage.

Bob Poston
Duke Energy
(713) 989-1712
(713) 989-0266 fax
(713) 204-7936 cell
rdposton@duke-energy.com


Here's a very rough draft of a set of slides we might use.  Let me know if
this is even close to what you have in mind.  I can have one of our
paralegals and our graphics dept. fill in whatever we need and make it look
good tomorrow.

Mark


Dave has asked that a Staff Meeting be scheduled for Wednesday February 7,
2001, from 3:00 pm til 5:00 pm in 30C1.  Please mark your calendar and plan
to attend.

If you have any questions and/or conflicts, please feel free to call me (Kay
3-0643).

Thanks,

Kay


---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT on 11/06/2000 11:18
AM ---------------------------

lamoss@duke-energy.com on 11/01/2000 08:44:48 AM
To: judy.townsend@enron.com
cc:
Subject: HPL Meter

     Alan Lambeth out of our Baytown office is who they can talk to about
that meter.
Hist # is 281.424.6812.


I will be out of the office the morning/afternoon of 03/28/01.  I should be
back around 4:30.  I can be reached on my cell phone (503)-887-3449.

Bill


We decide to leave out the $ value in order to focus them on the structure.  I do not see the conversation about option values on the pipe?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tycholiz, Barry
Sent:	Wednesday, October 31, 2001 2:10 PM
To:	Whitt, Mark
Subject:	FW: EPNG Proposal II

I thought we were going to show them a number to work with.... What is this conversation about option values on the pipe?

BT

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nemec, Gerald
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 4:37 PM
To:	Fuller, Dave; Whitt, Mark
Cc:	Miller, Stephanie; Tycholiz, Barry
Subject:	RE: EPNG Proposal II

Attached is the document with one change.

 << File: EPNG Capacity Proposal II1.doc >>

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Fuller, Dave
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 2:56 PM
To:	Whitt, Mark
Cc:	Nemec, Gerald; Miller, Stephanie; Tycholiz, Barry
Subject:	EPNG Proposal II

All,

Here is a draft document for BP, please review and comment.

Dave

 << File: EPNG Capacity Proposal II.doc >>


Subject to confirming the status and timing of the Retainage L/C with GE
(now C.1), our only comment is that the reference for the delivery of the
insurance certificates is to Section 5(f) of the Letter Agreement not 5(e)
as set forth in B.13.

Thanks.

Gregory F. Lang
Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP
1055 Washington Blvd.
Stamford, CT 06901

203.961.7446 (p)
203.674.7646 (direct fax)
203.359.3031 (firm fax)
gregorylang@paulhastings.com <mailto:gregorylang@paulhastings.com>

-----Original Message-----
From: Campbell, Carolyn [mailto:CCampbell@KSLAW.com]
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 4:51 PM
To: 'gregorylang@paulhastings.com'; 'iparker@freshfields.com'
Cc: 'kay.mann@enron.com'
Subject: Salmon Closing Checklist

<<2XNK03!.DOC>>  <<2XNKRED.DOC>>

Greg and Isabel:

We have enclosed clean and blacklined drafts of the closing checklist,
marked to reflect changes from the draft previously circulated.  Please
review and advise of any comments.  Thank you.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

Enclosures: 136928v3
136920vR3/2

Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not
the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

"paulhastings.com" made the following annotations on 04/30/01 17:17:13
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NEW E-MAIL ADDRESSES AT PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP

We have changed our e-mail address.  Our new domain name is
paulhastings.com.  In most cases, our address is composed of conventional
first name and last name plus @paulhastings.com.  Here are two examples:
janesmith@paulhastings.com and danjones@paulhastings.com.  If you have any
questions, please contact us at noc@paulhastings.com.

==============================================================================
"The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all
computers."

==============================================================================


Tuxes may be rented by out of town escorts either at an  "Al's Formal Wear" in their town or by calling the "Al's Formal Wear" here in  Houston with their measurements and referencing NCL Wildflower's reference #  3801702.

Call Jackie Scardello at 281-370-9779 if you have any  questions.


I was curious about the accuracy of our credit reserve model as a function of
the
number of simulations we use. This question, I think, is not so important
when we
calculate credit reserve, because the assumptions underlying our model are
pretty
rough anyway (here I mean the assumptions regarding price processes,
correlations, etc.)

This question becomes more essential when we talk about calculating
sensitivities of the
credit reserve to various factors. When the magnitude of the sensitivity is
comparable
to the accuracy of calculation of the credit reserve, what is the accuracy of
such sensitivity?

I performed a numerical experiment where I calculated the expected loss
for a simple portfolio with one counterparty (SITHE IND POWER) for different
number of simulations (10, 100, 1000, 10000, 100000) using old research
credit model.
You can see how the result converges and the relative error (compared to the
result for 100000 simulations which is assumed to be the most accurate) in
the
attached file.

Tanya.


i loved them in that i thought they were going to go up...i think they still
might

  3 weeks ago  now
short term very bullish  neutral
medium term neutral   neutral
longer term neutral   bearish

From: Jennifer Fraser/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/06/2001 11:34 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE:

what changed your mind re 02 and 03 --2 weeks ago you told me you loved
them....why are bearish out the back?

Jen Fraser
Enron Global Markets Fundamentals
713-853-4759

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Arnold, John
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 5:03 PM
To: Fraser, Jennifer
Subject: Re:

  What it's trading  what I think it's really worth
apr oct   540    500
nov mar 547    375
cal 2  491    400
cal 3   460    325

Obviously most bearish the further out you go.  However, the game right now
is not sell and hold...although it will be soon.  The game is where will it
be tomorrow and next week and next month.  The market is structurally short
term gas thanks to our friends from california.  where ca is buying power,
williams and calpine and dynegy dont care of the gas costs 450 or 475 or 500
or 525.  irrelevant.  so term is not going down in the short term unless the
front comes into the 400's and scares some producers to start hedging or we
or el paso can find fixed price lng to the tune of 250,000 a day for 10 years.

From: Jennifer Fraser/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/06/2001 10:37 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

what are your thoughts on

ap-oct
nov-mar
02
03

price levels and outlooks
 thanks
Jen Fraser
713-853-4759


I hope that you foot is okay.  You need to be careful.  I liked the shoes though.  It is too bad you can't wear heels.  You look really good in them.  I guess no more hoochi wear for right now huh?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Villarreal, Alexandra
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 8:47 AM
To:	Griffith, John
Subject:	RE:

wearing those heels yesterday was a bad idea.   they were killing me all night.  i had to take them off.   and then when i woke up this morning my ankle was swollen and bruised.  went to the dr earlier and she said i most likely injured a tendon or ligament.    great.  no heels for a while.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Griffith, John
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 8:28 AM
To:	Villarreal, Alexandra
Subject:

Hello?


no, sorry

	From:  Jody Crook @ ENRON                           09/27/2000 11:54 AM

To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: BB GAME

Eric,

I understand that you aren't playing tonight.  You don't happen to have your
jersey with you do you?

Jody


uggggghhhh!!!  what a complete and utter pr--k!!  i am SO annoyed reading
that story!  so even aside from the evening with your parents (which
approaches being understandable) he never was mature at all. i don't have
anything insightful to add to this situation- he appeared so genuine and
wonderful, but deep inside, he is a Californian....i have never been
impressed with California men in general- too self important and unduly
cocky.  his loss completely, which you know.

At least you have your plane ticket to London!  I'm so excited for you- you
world traveller!  You should send out a bulk email update when you return
so that all your friends and family stay informed on your exciting
life....Some friends of mine from NYC who now live in SF are coming in town
this weekend, and we're going to a benefit party at the Zoo. should be
fun.   i thought of you also because the symphony called and invited me to
opening night of the Connoisseur Series- wish you were going to be here!

Talk to you soon.  And remember: beauty and grace is the best revenge!
Julie

At 03:16 PM 9/21/00 -0500, you wrote:
>In an effort to save a little time I'm forwarding you the email I just sent
>my friend Emily in London.  Get back to me if you would like me to expound
>on anything.  Turns out he's a real jerk.
>
>Susan
>---------------------- Forwarded by Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT on 09/21/2000
>03:14 PM ---------------------------
>
>
>Susan M Scott
>09/21/2000 02:38 PM
>
>To:   ehillegeist@hotmail.com
>cc:
>Subject:  We have closure! (well, sort-of)
>
>I'm soooo good.  The chosen path was cool, indifference.
>
>So, last night was Steak Night and with Nick and Wilson both in town we had
>a really good showing.  I got there about 7:30 with Nick, and the group's
>size swelled to about 12+ by 8:30 - 9:00.  About 8:00 I saw Kevin (Ted's
>pal - the one you meet a steak night) wandering around LW's obviously in
>search of someone.  Can you believe it?  He (Ted) knew I had organized this
>gathering - I know that because Nick is working right across from he and
>Darren and overheard Darren encouraging Ted's attendance (mind you Ted was
>not in the email distribution) - and he had the nerve to come.  Anyway,
>Kevin saw me and came over to chat.  He informed me that "our friend Ted
>should be there shortly" to which I responded, "You would know better than
>me at this point".  The subject was dropped until he felt the need to raise
>it again.  He asked if Ted and I parted on good terms/ bad terms, etc.  I
>said there really weren't any terms, I just hadn't heard a peep out of him
>for about 2 weeks.  Kevin wanted to know if I was going to break a bottle
>over Ted's head and cause a big scene.  When I said no, I think he was
>genuinely disappointed.  I said in order for me to do something like that I
>would have to care about the "loss" and that, while a week or two earlier I
>might have cared a bit more, with each passing day the "loss" seems less
>and less like much of a loss.  Kevin told me I was better-off without Ted.
>To go even further, he informed me that there is no way he would ever let a
>daughter of his date Ted nor any of his "girl-friends".  He said that while
>he thought Ted was a great guy (i.e. fun to be around, good stories, etc.)
>he wasn't good dating material.  I agreed with Kevin saying "Ted is a great
>guy, he just makes a lousy man" (don't you like that one?).  I then went on
>to say "Anyway, I'm destined for bigger and better things, right?".  Kevin:
>"Much bigger and much better."  About this time my parents showed up...the
>plot thickens.  I introduced Kevin to my parents and since both my Dad and
>Kevin were in the Navy and attended Colorado they had much to talk about.
>The two of them had probably been talking for about half an hour when
>"dum-da-dum-dum" Ted shows up.  He approaches our group because he sees
>Kevin and is forced to make eye-contact with me.  I give him a "hey" and he
>gives me the arm squeeze and a much too pleasant "how's it going?".  He
>asked what Kevin and my Dad were talking about, I told him the Navy, he
>said don't get Kevin started or you'll never shut him up...Then he walked
>away.  He never acknowledged my parents nor did he ever speak to me again
>the rest of the evening.  The beautiful thing is Kevin stays and talks with
>my Dad for another half hour and when Darren shows up he hangs out with "my
>group" for quite a while before going to join Ted.  My parents and I ate
>our steaks right behind Ted and then went back over to our group at the
>picnic table when we were finished.  It really was a great night.  I would
>almost say I was glowing (I was having so much fun with my friends and
>family and it wasn't a show for Ted's benefit...I really was having a great
>time).  So, when my parents decide to head out they walked over to
>Ted/Kevin's table to say good-bye to Kevin.  It was awesome.  Ted's sitting
>right next to Kevin while Kevin and my Dad are talking and appears to be
>actually shrinking in his chair.  Yet again no acknowledgement of my
>parents - he couldn't even make eye-contact.  I ended up staying there for
>at least another hour and then went with a few of the guys to the Ale
>House.  Needless to say I was very hung over today.  Anyway, there's the
>story...He's a complete and utter ass-hole.  So I'm done.  And no, there is
>no way he could weasel his way back in to my good graces.
>
>Now on to a fun subject, my trip to London.  I bought my ticket today ( I
>think I got hosed a little bit, but it was the cheapest ticket I could find
>- $450 before taxes).  I will arrive at Heathrow airport around 7:00 a.m.
>Friday the 6th and depart about 11:00 a.m. on Tuesday the 10th.  I'm very
>excited about the trip, I really need to get out of Houston.  I leave the
>activities in your capable hands.  ( bear in mind I will have to see Darren
>and Nick at some point).
>
>"Single again" Sue
>
>


Steve,

We will get the financial details necessary to continue with the Rice proposal
on Tuesday afternoon.  Traci has set up a meeting with Wil Uecker, Associate
Dean for Executive Education (Jones School), on Tuesday morning where we will
be
discussing the school's systems and streaming needs.  We should have a better
idea after the meeting on what their needs will be in order to generate some
numbers for you.

Robert Hoodis will be accompanying us during this meeting.  He will help us
assess the cost of e-powering the university and give us some suggestions on
how
we can extract the necessary revenue out of the deal.

Any questions please call Traci at 3-3242 or me at 5-8141.

Regards,

Jaime E. Gualy
Enron Broadband Services, Inc.
Phone: (713) 345-8141
Cell:      (713) 412-0591


This is to nominate 75,000 MMBtu/d into Eastrans from HPL for Wed, 4/12/2000.

20,000 MMBtu/d will be redelivered into PG & E
 7,800 MMBtu/d will be redelivered into HPL from Fuels Cotton Valley
15,000 MMBtu/d into HPL's Cartwhell at Carthage
17,200 MMBtu/d into Mobil Beumont @ HSC - $.0375
15,000 MMBtu/d into Mobil Beaumont @ HSC - $.055

Sherry, I got your write-up and am working on it.

Thanks.


Mark,

First let me say thank you for your assistance in making it possible for
meteorologists Tony Hamilton and Stephen Bennett to hit the groung running
this week when they came over to London from Houston.  When we came into our
offices in Houston Monday morning, Tony and Steve had already gathered and
analyzed their data, prepared reports and were ready for the Avistar
briefings! The cross-Atlantic communication and data-sharing and manipulation
went seamlessly!  We have great expectations for continued synergy with this
new set-up.

The Research Weather Group is excited about our expanded responsibilities in
London. We are committed to maximizing the value added we can provide to the
Weather Derivatives, Crude & Products, UK Trading, Continental Power, and
Analytics efforts.  We are, however,  also extremely dependent on computers
and communication, associated software and peripherals.  Plus the datastreams
we access and the reports we generate are very time-critical in their value
to traders.  We need a very stable environment, with reliable back-up and
24-hour support to fulfill our commitments to providing the trading operation
with timely, never-fail research and information flows.

So, thanks again, and  please do whatever you can to continue this high level
of support by passing this letter of praise and thanks to your team, and show
them our appreciation for your efforts.

Mike Roberts


I'm in NM Thur. and Fri..  Alway's available by phone.  Got a time in mind?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 4:39 PM
To:	Keene, Patrick
Subject:	RE: Intervention into Nevada Power rate cases

Pat --

If you're in on Friday, let's sit down for 15.

Thanks,

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Keene, Patrick
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 12:19 PM
To:	'"Bonnie Drinkwater" <bdrinkwater@Mcdonaldcarano.com>@ENRON'; Kaufman, Paul
Cc:	Steffes, James D.
Subject:	RE: Intervention into Nevada Power rate cases

We should intervene based on our potential interest in serving customers pursuant to AB661(short answer=Paul's language).  It is possible that we may want to reduce revenue requirements by recommending the use of financial products to minimize utility revenue risk. We have intervened in the AB 661 regulation proceeding as Enron Energy Services, Inc. and Enron Power Marketing, Inc. If you think we can raise issues outside of "unbundling" we should limit our intervention to EES and EPMI.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Bonnie Drinkwater" <bdrinkwater@Mcdonaldcarano.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 11:58 AM
To:	Keene, Patrick; Kaufman, Paul
Cc:	Steffes, James D.
Subject:	RE: Intervention into Nevada Power rate cases

Pat,

Shall I use the language proposed by Paul or would you like me to say
something different?  Please let me know ASAP as I would like to get the
petition filed today.  Thanks.

Bonnie

-----Original Message-----
From: Keene, Patrick [mailto:Patrick.Keene@ENRON.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 8:55 AM
To: Kaufman, Paul; Bonnie Drinkwater
Cc: Steffes, James D.
Subject: RE: Intervention into Nevada Power rate cases

We have intervened in certain cases where we may have an ongoing
commercial interest to require "rate unbundling" in anticipation of
direct access.  We also can intervene on behalf of EWS who may provide
risk mgt. products to reduce utility rates (i.e., weather derivitives to
stabilize rates and reduce utility-reated risk).  In this case we are
there to make sure rates are properly unbundled to facilitate AB 661.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kaufman, Paul
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 7:57 PM
To: 'Bonnie Drinkwater'
Cc: Keene, Patrick; Steffes, James D.
Subject: RE: Intervention into Nevada Power rate cases

By this e-mail, I'm forwarding this to Pat Keene.  He will be your main
contact on Nevada matters for a while.  I'm swamped processing the
filings for the sale of PGE.  My view is that it should be both ENA and
EES.  Our interest is:  (1) we are a potential new electric resource
under AB 661; and (2) these cases will influence whether we can serve
customers under the statute as the unbundled costs incurred by our
potential customers will be determined in this case.

Pat:  What do we say in other states where we intervene and there is no
direct access?  I'd rather not say that we that we are representing the
interests of several large consumers in Nevada.  It opens our deals up
for discovery.

-----Original Message-----
From: Bonnie Drinkwater [mailto:bdrinkwater@Mcdonaldcarano.com]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 5:23 PM
To: Kaufman, Paul
Subject: Intervention into Nevada Power rate cases

Paul,

As I was preparing the petition to intervene, it occurred to me that
information has changed.  Do you want the petition to reflect both ENRON
ENERGY SERVICES, INC. and ENRON NORTH AMERICA.  Also, since you do not
own LV Cogen anymore, what would you like me to put as the reasons for
intervention for these entities.  I have attached a draft petition.  It
needs to be filed on Wednesday.

Thanks for your assistance.

Bonnie

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
(or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender
or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not
create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron
Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other
party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by
estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


I will have the documents emailed today.  In addition please feel free to
contact Ms. Anna Gardiner +44 20 7783 4304 (ANNA.GARDINER@ENRON.COM) with any
operational questions.  We will need to get a customer list from you at your
convenience so that we can begin comparing to our counterparty list.  Please
forward this list to Anna once it is ready.  Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From:  "Goldsmith, Ian" <IGoldsmith@NatSourceTullettEurope.com>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Goldsmith+2C+20Ian+22+20+3CIGoldsmith+40NatSourceTullett
Europe+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 8:28 AM
To: Shults, Bob
Cc: Clark, Keith; Thomas, Sheri; JCogen Natsource
Subject: RE: Enron on Line

Hi Bob
Thanks for your help
I have left a message on your voice mail.
If I dont speak tp you for some reason please send the documentation to

Ian Goldsmith
Natsource - Tullett Europe Ltd
Cable House
54 - 62 New Broad Street
London
EC2M  IJJ

Kind regards
Ian

-----Original Message-----
From: Bob.Shults@enron.com [mailto:Bob.Shults@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 2:14 PM
To: Goldsmith, Ian
Cc: Keith.Clark@enron.com; Sheri.Thomas@enron.com; JCogen Natsource
Subject: RE: Enron on Line

Ian,

I will have 5 guest user Id's emailed which will give you access to
EnronOnline temporarily.  I have the documentation ready for your review.
Where do you want the documentation sent?

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "Goldsmith, Ian" <IGoldsmith@NatSourceTullettEurope.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Goldsmith+2C+20Ian+22+20+3CIGoldsmith+40NatSourceTulle
ttEurope+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]

   Sent:   Wednesday, May 16, 2001 2:22 AM
   To:     Shults, Bob
   Cc:     JCogen Natsource; Marc Mellman; Wold, Per-otto; Kandolha, David;
             Harvey W. Abrahams; Ann, Henry; 'Steve Touchstone (E-mail)'
   Subject:  RE: Enron on Line

   Hi Bob
   Thanks for your call
   I would very much like to have access and see EOL while you work on the
   documentation
   I will call you this afternoon on 713 853 0397 to confirm the details
   etc
   Kind regards
   Ian


There are clearly a large number of people who need to know what is happening
on the integration of the MG metals business and a large number of fluid
teams working on different aspects of the project; however, most issues
related to the integration process will only be of interest to a subset of
the people involved.

We currently have two main forums for information sharing available to
members of the integration team:

The weekly newsletter produced by Fiona Grant in PR, which from 30 June
onwards will be sent to EEL management and the heads of those departments
represented on the Integration Team.
A weekly meeting on Friday mornings from 8am to 9am in NW1006, which has been
put in place to provide team leaders with an opportunity to update the entire
integration team on their top two or three issues for the past and/or coming
week.

For now, I expect the weekly update and the weekly meetings to meet the
information needs of the integration team.  If you feel this is not adequate,
then let either myself or Fiona Grant know and we'll do a re-think on the
subject.

To this end, and in the interests of ensuring that we conclude our discussion
in the allotted time, the following are a few organisational points I would
like everyone to bear in mind when attending the Friday morning meeting:

Attendees should distinguish between presenters and audience at the weekly
meeting.
Presenters should attend if at all possible and, in the event they are unable
to attend, should nominate a replacement for the meeting (replacements should
be notified to Esther Gerratt in advance of the  Friday morning meeting if
possible).

For the time being, presenters and their designated areas are:

- Eric Gadd  Commercial and Acquisition progress
- Amita Gosalia  EOL
- Justin Boyd  Legal
- Toby Knight  Premises
- Barry Sangster  IT infrastructure
- Bob Campbell  IT applications
- Richard Sage  Middle and Back Offices and Project Management
- Lloyd Fleming  RAC
- Tim Davies  Credit
- Anne Edgley  Finance
- Anne Hicks  Cash Management
- Janine Juggins  Tax
- Andrea Kerch  US GAAP and Due diligence
- Nigel Sellens  HR
- Fiona Grant  PR
- Bruce Garner  Business Development

As  this is intended to be an "update"-only meeting, any unresolved
substantive issues are to be taken off-line and the resolution reported the
following week.
Lastly, I would request that presenters focus on communicating, in an
efficient manner, things which affect other functions within the integration
process.  Doing so will assit other presenters in relaying the information
presented at the meeting to other personnel in their respective areas.

I hope you find this useful.   We want to keep the information flowing as we
continue the integration process, but at the same time we need to make sure
we use our time wisely and efficiently.

Regards,
Eric


Thanks.  Best of luck.  Don't hesitate to call if there's anything you need.
Look forward to getting down to S.D. soon.  Maybe we can talk Jessie into
having a drink.

Best,
Jeff


Trading News Alerts' Last 3 Picks are over 475%
Here Is Our Next Hot Pick!

IRV INC (OTCBB: IRVV)

URGENT BUY (IRVV) AT $.60 PER SHARE!

SELL TARGET $2.25 PER SHARE!

Our track record shows we offer valuable research that makes a difference to our
investors. We target serious gains for serious investors looking for agressive
moves in undervalued situations.

This Company is Making An Aquisiton!

iRV, Inc. Announces Intent to Acquire Scarab Systems, Inc., Smart CardPayment Solution Provider
BOULDER, Colo., Dec 13, 2001 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ -- The Board of Directors of iRV, Inc. (OTC Bulletin Board: IRVV) is pleased to announce that the company has signed a non-binding letter of intent to acquire Scarab Systems, Inc., a privately held Nevada corporation. Scarab Systems is engaged in the distribution and sale of smart card payment systems for applications in e-commerce, banking, telecommunications, security and personal data transfer. The acquisition will proceed subject to completion of specific terms and conditions to be laid out in a definitive agreement. The transaction is also subject to the completion by Scarab Systems of a private placement and other customary conditions.

Scarab Systems, Inc. has a license to provide rechargeable stored value smart cards for private label applications that the cardholder can load from a designated banking account via the Internet or via designated Automated Banking Machines (ABM). The funds can be withdrawn from most ATMs worldwide, or the stored value can be used to purchase goods and services anywhere that VISA is accepted, whether online or in brick and mortar businesses. Scarab's payment solutions operate on existing network infrastructures. Unlike many other smart card systems, Scarab's program uses existing processing and billing platforms and encryption technology, which work with existing POS and ATM systems. This technology helps eliminate the usual cost-prohibitive infrastructure required to set up a smart card program.

"Scarab Systems licensed technology provides exciting prospects for innovative payment solutions that we feel represent a valuable contribution in iRV's strategy of expanding its technological asset base. The acquisition of Scarab represents a critical step in the process of implementing technologies that deliver recurring revenue," stated Clifford C. Thygesen, President of iRV, Inc.

"The public market allows the investment community the opportunity to share in the exciting growth that Scarab Systems and the smart card industry is experiencing. The revised corporate structure will help accelerate the rollout of Scarab's payment system technologies," stated Thomas Mills, President of Scarab Systems.

The smart card industry continues to experience tremendous growth. Each year card sales continue to set records, as the market is poised for enormous prosperity in the new millennium. Smart card sales at $274 Million in 1996 are estimated to be $5 Billion in 2003 (Frost & Sullivan). It is estimated that the industry as a whole will continue to grow at a rate between 30% and 50% annually for the foreseeable future (SBJ Research).

Safe Harbor Statement: The statements contained herein which are not historical fact are forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements, including but not limited to, certain delays in testing and evaluation of products and other risks detailed from time to time in iRV Inc. filings with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission

IMPORTANT NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER: The purpose of this
advertisement, like any advertising, is to provide coverage
and publicity for the advertising company, its products or
services. The information provided in this advertisement is
not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person or
entity in any jurisdiction or country where such
distribution or use would be contrary to law or regulation
or which would subject us to any registration requirement
within such jurisdiction or country. Verify all claims and
do your own due diligence. This advertisement is not a
solicitation or recommendation to buy, sell or hold
securities and does not provide an analysis of the
financial position of the company. We recommend you use the
information found in this advertisement as an initial
starting point for conducting your own research on the
advertised company in order to determine your own personal
opinion of the company before investing. All information
concerning the advertised company contained herein should
be verified independently by an attorney, with such company
and an independent licensed securities analyst. We are not
offering securities for sale. An offer to buy or sell can
be made only with accompanying disclosure documents and
only in the states and provinces for which they are
approved. Many states have established rules requiring the
approval of a security by a state security administrator.
Check with http://www.nasaa.org and call your state
security administrator to determine whether a particular
security is licensed for sale in your state. Many companies
have information filed with state securities regulators and
many will supply investors with additional information on
request. All statements and opinions contained in this
advertisement are the sole opinion of the authors and are
subject to change without notice. We are not liable for any
investment decisions by our readers. Readers should
independently investigate and fully understand all risks
before investing. It is strongly recommended that any
purchase or sale decision be discussed with a financial
adviser or broker prior to completing any such purchase or
sale decision. We are not registered investment advisers,
or broker-dealers, or members of any financial regulatory
bodies. The information contained in this advertisement is
provided as an information service only. The accuracy or
completeness of the information is not warranted and is
only as reliable as the sources from which it was obtained.
We disclaim any and all liability as to the completeness or
accuracy of the information and for any omissions of
material facts. This advertisement may contain hyperlinks
to web sites operated by third parties other than us. Such
hyperlinks are provided for the reader's reference and
convenience only. We are not responsible for the
reliability of these external sites nor are we responsible
for any of the contents, advertising, products, or other
materials on such external sites. Our inclusion of
hyperlinks to such web sites does not imply any endorsement
of the material on such web sites or any association with
their operators. Under no circumstances shall we be held
responsible or liable, directly or indirectly, for any loss
or damage caused or alleged to have been caused in
connection with the use of or reliance on any content,
goods, or services available on such external site. Any
concerns regarding any external link should be directed to
its respective site administrator or webmaster. We may
refer to other sources of information, or other commentary.
We intend to offer these items to readers as additional
sources of information, but disclaim any implication that
we endorse information contained in such outside sources.
Any referral by us is no guarantee of the accuracy of any
information provided by outside sources. As we disclaim any
representation concerning source reliability, readers must
contact information suppliers on their own and gauge to the
reader's satisfaction the truthfulness of any source
information. It should be understood that there is no
guarantee past performance will be indicative of future
results. Any reference to past performance(s) of companies
previously advertised are specially selected to be
referenced based on the favorable performance of these
companies and the companies referenced may not be
representative of all past advertised companies as not all
past advertised companies may have performed as well.
Readers are cautioned that small and micro-cap stocks are
high-risk investments and that they may lose all or a
portion of their investment if they make a purchase in our
advertised stocks. In order to be in full compliance with
the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, Section 17(b), the publisher
of this report,is receiving 200,000 shares of RESTRICTED STOCK
of Irv Inc. as compensation for the distribution
of this and other advertisements. Since we
have received compensation and hold stock in the advertised
company there is an inherent conflict of interest in our
statements and opinions and such statements and opinions
cannot be considered independent. We will benefit from any
increase in share price of the advertised company. We will
sell our shares at any time, without notice, be that
before, during or immediately after the release of this
advertisement. The liquidation of our stock may have a
negative impact on the securities of the company
liquidated, including decreased market value and/or
dilution of the company's securities. Furthermore, our
associates and/or employees and/or principals may have
stock positions in advertised companies purchased in the
open market or in private transactions. These positions may
be liquidated, without prior notification, even after we
have made positive comments regarding the advertised
company. It should be understood that any price targets
and/or projections mentioned are solely opinions and should
not be taken as suggested holding periods. In fact, we will
sell our positions in any companies advertised before they
reach such target prices. The receipt of this information
constitutes your acceptance of these terms and conditions.
Reading this advertisement shall not create under any
circumstances an offer to buy or sell stock in any company
advertised. Nor shall it create any principal-agent
relationship between the reader and us. The stocks of
advertised companies may trade in fast moving, highly
volatile markets, and any reader should observe the trading
behavior of any advertised company prior to investing.
Advertised stocks are often thinly traded and large sell
orders will have a substantially negative impact on share
price. Investors in advertised stocks may experience
difficulty in selling shares without seeing a decline in
market price and may have difficulty in finding ready
buyers of their stock. Information within this
advertisement contains "forward looking" statements within
the meaning of Section 27(a) of the U.S. Securities Act of
1933 and Section 21(e) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act
of 1934. Any statements that express or involve discussions
with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans,
projections, objectives, goals, assumptions or future
events or performance are not statements of historical
facts and may be forward looking statements. Forward
looking statements are based on expectations, estimates and
projections at the time the statements are made that
involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could
cause actual results or events to differ materially from
those presently anticipated. Forward looking statements may
be identified through the use of words such as expects,
will, anticipates, estimates, believes, or by statements
indicating certain actions may, could or might occur. We
encourage our readers to invest carefully and read the
investor information available at the web sites of the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) at
http://www.sec.gov and the National Association of
Securities Dealers (NASD) at http://www.nasd.com. We also
strongly recommend that you read the SEC advisory to
investors concerning Internet Stock Fraud, which can be
found at http://www.sec.gov/consumer/cyberfr.htm. The NASD
has published information on how to invest carefully at its
web site. Readers can review all public filings by
companies at the SEC s EDGAR page. All information within
this advertisement is qualified in its entirety by the
detailed information and financial statements of the
advertised company contained in its regulatory filings with
the SEC.
[2637WoIa4-@9]


deal, but I won't be able to until next week.  This week is crazy!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:51 PM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

ok , well lets make it soon

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:50 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

I will too

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:46 PM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

you wont get in trouble

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:46 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

yeah right

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:45 PM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

lets go

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:45 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

I'm always ready

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:45 PM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

i know what a perfect day, ready

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:44 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

I'm not so sore anymore, it's only certain days now, not all the time.  It sure looks like it's raining outside (hint-hint)

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:43 PM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

im a little hung over, i was here for a little while yesterday, are you still sore

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:42 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

I think you need to too.  I am feeling okay, except for this headache that is creeping up.  How are you today?  Were you here yesterday?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:41 PM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

thats a very good point, i need to work that out, how are you feeling

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:40 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

I know, but if you were my boss, then I would be able to

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:40 PM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

you cant unfortunately

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:40 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

let's go

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:39 PM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

now

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:39 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

and I'm ready to anytime

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:39 PM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

you can anyway

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:37 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

I think so, I would treat you better than she can

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:36 PM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

we will have to work on that in the future

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:36 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

No, I'm actually pretty happy about the deal.  Not as happy as I would be if I were working for you.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:35 PM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

thats not bad

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:35 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

Yeah, right.  I wish! I am working for Chris still and Scott Neal.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:34 PM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

perfect, are you working with me

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:32 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:

We're going to be sitting kina close after the move.


Back at cha!

"Lisa Clarke" <lisa@casa-de-clarke.com> on 08/28/2000 01:39:41 PM
To: Kay Mann <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: FW: Please read and send back

I usually stay away from spam, but I thought this was nice.
>  > > >>
>  > > >> > > > > > I said a prayer for you just now.....
>  > > >> > > > > > When you receive this e-mail just
>  > > >> > > > > > recite the following prayer. That's all you have to
>  > > >> > > > > > do.
>  > > >> > > > > > There is nothing attached.
>  > > >> > > > > > This is the power of prayer at work. Just send
>  > > >> > > > > > this to (4) people and see what happens on the
>  > > >> > > > > > fourth  day.
>  > > >> > > > > > Do not break this, please. There is no cost, but
>  > > >> > > > > > lots of rewards.
>  > > >> > > > > > Let's continue to pray for one another.
>  > > >> > > > > >
>  > > >> > > > > > PRAYER:
>  > > >> > > > > > May today there be peace within you.
>  > > >> > > > > > May you trust God that you are exactly where
>  > > >> > > > > > you are meant to be.
>  > > >> > > > > > May you not forget the infinite possibilities
>  > > >> > > > > > that are born of faith. May you use those gifts
>  > > >> > > > > > that you have received, and pass on the love that has
>  > > >> > > > > > been given to you. May you be content knowing that
>  > > >> > > > > > you are a child of God. Let His presence settle
>  > > >> > > > > > into your bones, and allow your soul the freedom to
>  > > >> > > > > > sing, dance, and to bask in the sun. It is there for
>  > > >> > > > > > each and every one of you.
>  > > >> > > > > >
>  > > >> > > > > > Send this to (4) or more people and
>  > > >> > > > > > witness the awesome power of  prayer
>  > > >>
>
>


---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 03/06/2000 05:52 PM
---------------------------

Molly Harris
03/06/2000 05:53 PM
To: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice
Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie
R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Hunter-Lindsay/LON/ECT@ECT, Coenraad
Basson/LON/ECT@ECT, Bhautik Patel/LON/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, David
Weekes/LON/ECT@ECT, Carrie Southard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Linda S Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EOL Credit Responses 3/6

Please find attached Credit's EOL responses for 3/6/00.

Regards
Molly


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Love, Phillip M.
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 9:09 AM
To:	Giron, Darron C.; Bass, Eric; Bosse, Kevin; Lilly, Kyle R.; Baumbach, David; "Jason <jmjaked (E-mail); Mike <mjillard (E-mail); Toni" "D'Agostina (E-mail); Crowell, Scott
Subject:	FW: THINK ABOUT IT!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"James Love" <James.Love@msl.redstone.army.mil>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 7:12 AM
To:	Love, Phillip M.; Craig Langhauser; Phil Hooper; Phillip Roberts; Tracy Magnusson; EDowling@quantum-intl.com
Subject:	Fwd: THINK ABOUT IT!

Received: from SAALT-SENTRY.saalt.army.mil	(saalt-sentry.army.pentagon.mil [140.185.59.36])	by msl.redstone.army.mil,peomsl-mail.redstone.army.mil; Mon, 22 Oct 2001 07:07:18 -0500
Received: from saaltgate.saalt.army.mil by SAALT-SENTRY.saalt.army.mil          via smtpd (for peomsl-mail.redstone.army.mil [136.205.121.145]) with SMTP; 22 Oct 2001 11:56:19 UT
Received: by saaltgate.saalt.army.mil with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)	id <VGYATZST>; Mon, 22 Oct 2001 08:02:57 -0400
Message-ID: <37BD0AE88DCAD311AA3600508B6FEE44045E407B@saaltexchange.saalt.army.mil>
From: "Contreras, Andres MAJ(P) SAALT" <andres.contreras@saalt.army.mil>
To: 'Anthony Suarez' <Lawrence.Suarez@CEN.AMEDD.ARMY.MIL>, 'Chris Wagner'	 <chris_wagner@drs.com>, 'Chuck Hagar' <hagarco@vmi.edu>, 	'Eduardo Ramirez' <EDUARDORAMIREZR@aol.com>, 'Gary Amundson'	 <gary45K@aol.com>, 'Gene Pineda' <OnePineda@aol.com>, 'George Moore'	 <mooreg@benning.army.mil>, 'George Malone' <malonejr@hotmail.com>, 	'Glenn Jones' <glennonjones@yahoo.com>, 'Gloria Helms'	 <ghelms@butler.buccc.cc.ks.us>, 'Henry Vance'	 <VANCEH@LEAVENWORTH.ARMY.MIL>, 'Jim Love'	 <James.Love@msl.redstone.army.mil>, 'John Harris'	 <john.harris@msl.redstone.army.mil>, "'John Sanchez (Work)'"	 <John@Baskow.com>, 'Larry Williams' <larry-williams@raytheon.com>, 	'Larry Suarez' <lsuarez@concentric.net>, 'Mark Pineda' <Topineda@aol.com>, 	'Mark Roushia' <RoushiaM@tacom.army.mil>, 'Marsha Day'	 <marsha.day@msl.redstone.army.mil>, 'Michael Brown'	 <MICHAEL.BROWN@arpstl.army.mil>, 'Nick Harris'	 <harrisnicholas@forscom.army.mil>, 'Norma Kohler'	 <NORMA_KOHLER@udlp.com>, 'Pam Woolery'	 <wooleryp@comanche.redstone.army.mil>, 'Steve Metzger'	 <Steve@hot.rr.com>, 'Tim Long' <t_long@drs-sensor.com>, 'Tomas Serna'	 <Tomas.Serna@AMEDD.ARMY.MIL>, 'Valerie Ward'	 <Valerie.Ward@hood-ctsfmail.army.mil>, 'Wayne Allen'	 <m-allen3@raytheon.com>
Subject: THINK ABOUT IT!
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 08:02:17 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;	boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C15AF1.6526E2F0"

	> > >
	> > >
	> > > > > >
	> > > After the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, which killed six
and injured
	> > > 1,000; President Clinton promised that those responsible would
be
	>hunted
	> > > down and punished.
	> > >
	> > > After the 1995 bombing in Saudi Arabia, which killed five U.S.
military
	> > > personnel; Clinton promised that those responsible would be
hunted down
	> > > and punished.
	> > >
	> > > After the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing in Saudi Arabia, which
killed 19
	>and
	> > > injured 200 U.S. military personnel; Clinton promised that
those
	> > > responsible would be hunted down and punished.
	> > >
	> > > After the 1998 bombing of U.S. embassies in Africa, which
killed 224
	>and
	> > > injured 5,000; Clinton promised that those responsible would
be hunted
	> > > down and punished.
	> > >
	> > > After the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole, which killed 17 and
injured 39
	> > > U.S. sailors; Clinton promised that those responsible would be
hunted
	> > > down
	> > > and punished.
	> > >
	> > > Maybe if Clinton had kept his promise, an estimated 7,000
people in New
	> > > York and Washington, D.C. who are now dead would be alive
today.
	> > >
	> > > AN INTERESTING QUESTION:
	> > >
	> > > This question was raised on a Philly radio call-in show.
Without casting
	> > > stones, it is a legitimate question:
	> > >
	> > > There are two men, both extremely wealthy. One develops
relatively
	>cheap
	> > > software and gives billions of dollars to charity. The other
sponsors
	> > > terrorism. That being the case, why is it that the Clinton
	>Administration
	> > > spent more money over the past eight years chasing down Bill
Gates
	>rather
	> > > than Osama bin Laden?
	> > >
	> > >
	> > > MAKES NO SENSE!
	> > >
	> > > It is a strange turn of events. Hillary gets $8 Million for
her
	> > > forthcoming memoirs. Bill gets about $12 Million for his
memoirs yet to
	>be
	> > > written. This from two people who have spent the past 8 years
being
	>unable
	> > > to recall anything about past events while under oath!
	> > > Incredible!
	> > >

> > >
> > >
> > > > > >
> > > After the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, which killed six and injured
> > > 1,000; President Clinton promised that those responsible would be
>hunted
> > > down and punished.
> > >
> > > After the 1995 bombing in Saudi Arabia, which killed five U.S. military
> > > personnel; Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down
> > > and punished.
> > >
> > > After the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing in Saudi Arabia, which killed 19
>and
> > > injured 200 U.S. military personnel; Clinton promised that those
> > > responsible would be hunted down and punished.
> > >
> > > After the 1998 bombing of U.S. embassies in Africa, which killed 224
>and
> > > injured 5,000; Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted
> > > down and punished.
> > >
> > > After the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole, which killed 17 and injured 39
> > > U.S. sailors; Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted
> > > down
> > > and punished.
> > >
> > > Maybe if Clinton had kept his promise, an estimated 7,000 people in New
> > > York and Washington, D.C. who are now dead would be alive today.
> > >
> > > AN INTERESTING QUESTION:
> > >
> > > This question was raised on a Philly radio call-in show. Without casting
> > > stones, it is a legitimate question:
> > >
> > > There are two men, both extremely wealthy. One develops relatively
>cheap
> > > software and gives billions of dollars to charity. The other sponsors
> > > terrorism. That being the case, why is it that the Clinton
>Administration
> > > spent more money over the past eight years chasing down Bill Gates
>rather
> > > than Osama bin Laden?
> > >
> > >
> > > MAKES NO SENSE!
> > >
> > > It is a strange turn of events. Hillary gets $8 Million for her
> > > forthcoming memoirs. Bill gets about $12 Million for his memoirs yet to
>be
> > > written. This from two people who have spent the past 8 years being
>unable
> > > to recall anything about past events while under oath!
> > > Incredible!
> > >


Executive Committee Weekly Meeting
Date:  Monday, November 13
Time:  11:00 a.m. (CDT)
Location: 50th Floor Boardroom
Video:  Connections will be established with remote locations upon request.
Conf call: AT&T lines have been reserved.  Please contact Sherri Sera
(713/853-5984)
  or Katherine Brown (713/345-7774) for the weekly dial-in number and
passcode.

Please indicate below whether or not you plan to attend this meeting and
through what medium.

 Yes, I will attend in person _______

 By video conference from _______

 By conference call  _______

 No, I will not attend  _______

*  *  *

Please return this e-mail to me with your response by 12:00 p.m., Friday,
November 10.

Thank you,
Katherine


Shelley, I wanted to see if I could get the PAA in for Ava.  I think she did a very good job on the
	Transwestern meeting and I would like to recognize her for that.  If you approve, then I will
	send to Fran to fill out the appropriate information.  Thanks. Lynn


http://www.consultrci.com

************************************************************************

Read SCIENTECH's free SourceBook Weekly article: "Australia: Jewel in the
Crown for Some U.S. Investors" at:
http://www.consultrci.com/web/rciweb.nsf/Web+Pages/SBEntrance.html
************************************************************************

===============================================================
SCIENTECH IssueAlert, October 9, 2000
Oil and Natural-Gas Shortages: Will They Create a Winter of Discontent?
By: Will McNamara, Director, Electric Industry Analysis
===============================================================

U.S. retail energy fuel costs, already high by historical standards, are
expected to remain high this winter due to crude prices that are projected
to remain at levels unseen since the Gulf War, said the Department of Energy
on Friday. In addition, households that use natural gas are likely to see
the largest year-on-year percentage increase in their bills as well, according
to the Energy Information Administration (EIA). The agency said U.S. residents
can expect heating expenditures to increase by 25 percent for heating oil
and propane and 40 percent for natural gas.

ANALYSIS: Despite common belief to the contrary, there is a direct correlation
between the price cycles of oil and natural gas. The fact that there are
legitimate concerns surrounding the availability of both power sources
gives validity to the warnings of price increases this winter. When fuel
prices are low and natural-gas supplies are abundant, there is arguably
little connection between the two. However, the present situation as we
head into winter is the exact opposite*high oil prices and a comprised
supply of natural gas, leaving the two unquestionably intertwined. As energy
users opt to switch from oil to natural gas, this affects natural gas supply
and raises gas prices.

How did we arrive at this alarming situation, which may have been justifiably
labeled an "energy crisis"? Regarding oil, in 1998 the worldwide oil industry
witnessed a decline in oil prices*spawned in part by the economic problems
in Asia*which hit a low of less than $10 a barrel in March 1998. Oil producers
voluntarily initiated decreased production, which unsurprisingly started
a swift climb in prices in 1999, as demand started to increase in a
rejuvenated
Asia and the United States. Together, this has created a volatile mix of
substantially higher crude oil prices, lower inventories and increased
demand. Even though OPEC has made promises of up to 1.1 million additional
barrels of crude oil per day*a result of political pressure put on it by
the United States and other countries*it may not be able to force its members
to increase production, as obviously it's in the best interest of oil
producers
to keep supplies tight and prices high. In addition, even if they materialize,
these increases promised by OPEC may not be enough to meet growing demand.
This is alarming as the United States is very reliant on foreign oil, which
already accounts for about half of U.S. oil use.

The high price of oil has sent many customers looking for natural gas,
only to find that it is also in questionable supply. Most reports suggest
that natural gas heats about 55 percent of all U.S. homes. The imbalance
between supply and demand found in the oil industry is also found in natural
gas, resulting in a projected 20 to 40 percent increase in heating bills
this winter. Over the last month, prices for natural-gas futures have climbed
to record levels of more than $5 per million Btus. Yet, unlike oil, most
of the blame placed on low supply for natural gas focuses on the United
States rather than other countries. A reported 60 percent of federal lands
have been placed off limits to natural-gas drillers, leaving as many as
200 million acres (out of a total of 1.5 billion) available but restricted
for natural-gas expansion. The Clinton administration and environmental
groups have been fiercely protective of federal reserve lands and prohibited
drilling for natural gas (or oil) in states like Alaska, where some 36
trillion cubic feet of gas is known to be locked underground. At the same
time, EPA standards have become so pro-natural gas over the last decade
that few coal-fired plants have been built in the last 10-20 years, placing
an increasingly high dependence on natural gas, even though alternative
fuels are not necessarily available to serve as a substitute.

Given the connection between oil and natural gas, any successful attempt
to lower oil prices would in turn help to lower natural-gas prices. The
ability to rely more heavily on oil once again would decrease the need
for fuel switching, thus reducing the present burden on natural gas. Toward
this end, in late September President Clinton authorized the release of
30 million barrels of crude oil from the U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve
(SPR), the nation's emergency oil stockpile. The president's action caused
additional alarm in some groups who said that the need to tap into emergency
supplies so early in the season signaled real trouble with oil supplies.
Others said the 30 million barrels would do little to ease the problem,
and that it would take between 2 and 3 million barrels a day for one month
to reduce current crude oil prices.

So what is the solution? As noted, the issue has become politically polarized.
Within their campaign proposals, Gov. Bush proposes spending $7.1 billion
to open up U.S. energy resources and reduce dependence on foreign sources.
Specifically, Bush has proposed, among other things, opening 8 percent
of the Arctic National Wildlife Range, which probably contains about 10
billion barrels of oil. Vice President Gore opposes drilling in federal
land, and instead aims to protect the U.S. environment, increase reliance
on low-pollution fuels and focus on energy-efficiency / lower consumption
programs. Articulating the Democratic position on this issue, Senator Joe
Lieberman made the following comments last week in the vice presidential
debate: "There are more resources within the United States. If we can get
three miles more per gallon from our cars, we'll get a million*we'll save
a million barrels of oil a day, which is exactly what the refuge, at its
best, in Alaska, would produce(We've got to develop fuel cells, alternative
energy. We've got to encourage people to conserve..."

But what is the answer now, as winter fast approaches? Unfortunately, natural
gas has no emergency fund like the SPR which it can tap into. The degree
to which the oil/gas supply issue will have a dramatic impact this winter
will depend on the weather. The colder the temperature, the greater the
need for heating power sources, which will drive up the cost for both oil
and natural gas. Meteorologists are predicting a tough winter, one that
in actuality may be near normal but will seem colder after the four past
winters, which were unusually mild due to La Nia. Already, temperatures
are dipping to surprising lows across the country. Considering that it
is only early October, warnings are continuing to accumulate that supply
will be stretched to meet demand, which unquestionably will drive up the
price of energy bills.

Looking forward, much of what happens from here will depend on which candidate
is elected in November. Most within the energy industry agree that more
production is the only answer to supply concerns. Yet, expanding production
will not be an easy task, especially in an election year. This is not an
issue that is gaining high priority within Congress, as politicians aim
to end their session before the presidential election. With such exceedingly
opposed candidates, the impact that the imminent election will have on
future energy policy cannot be underestimated.

==============================================================

SCIENTECH can help you find the answers you need.  From simple questions
to complex problems, our experts and consultants will get results. Learn
more about our six service areas at:

http://www.consultrci.com/web/rciweb.nsf/Web+Pages/About_RCI.html

===============================================================

SCIENTECH is pleased to provide you with your free, daily IssueAlert. Let
us know if we can help you with in-depth analyses or any other SCIENTECH
information products including e-commerce and telecom in the electric utility
industry. If you would like to refer a colleague to receive our free, daily
IssueAlerts, please reply to this email and include their full name and
email address or register directly at:

http://www.consultrci.com/web/infostore.nsf/Products/IssueAlert

Sincerely,

Will McNamara
Director, Electric Industry Analysis
wmcnamara@scientech.com
===============================================================
Feedback regarding SCIENTECH's IssueAlert should be sent to
wmcnamara@scientech.com
===============================================================

SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are compiled based on independent analysis by
SCIENTECH
consultants.  The opinions expressed in SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are not
intended to predict financial performance of companies discussed or to
be the basis for investment decisions of any kind.  SCIENTECH's sole purpose
in publishing its IssueAlerts is to offer an independent perspective regarding
the key events occurring in the energy industry, based on its long-standing
reputation as an expert on energy and telecommunications issues.

Copyright 2000.  SCIENTECH, Inc.

If you do not wish to receive any further IssueAlerts from SCIENTECH, please
reply to this message and in the body of the email type "remove."


Please give Kourt a call on her cell and get an answer to the question below.

			Thanks
			   Chris
--------------------- Forwarded by Chris Stokley/HOU/ECT on 04/18/2001 11:39 AM ---------------------------
From:	Godfrey Hyde/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/18/2001 12:41 PM CDT
To:	Chris Stokley/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	FW:

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hyde, Godfrey
Sent:	Wednesday, April 18, 2001 11:34 AM
To:	Nelson, Kourtney
Subject:

Hi Kourtney,

Can you please let me know if Sierra Power is a new Counterparty.

Godfrey Hyde
X57741


Dear Ben Rogers,

You have been invited to participate in a deal on DealBench, sponsored by
Enron for Wheatland.

You are about to experience firsthand our secure platform that enables
clients to conduct their business on the web. We provide a collaborative
environment to share documents, conduct auctions, host webcasts, manage deal
information and monitor deal progress - instantly, efficiently and
effectively.

In order to be able to view the deal, you have to update your user profile
with the deal key: 9703507563673698. This will enable you to view the deal
and participate in the process.  Please also remember that this deal key is
specific to the above deal.

We are looking forward to working with you.

If you have any questions or are unable to access the system, please email us
at: Webmaster@DealBench.com or call us at: +1-713-853-9438.

We encourage your feedback on both the platform and service, either via email
or telephone.

Kind regards,

WebMaster
DealBench


Attached  is the Staff's 1st Set of Data Request to AES Placerita.
 - data request 1 to AES Placerita.wpd


I am told that due to the lack of settlement the Judge will recommend a refund based on a proxy MCP wherein there will be a daily or hourly heat rate multiplied by a DAILY gas price + O&M.  Emission costs would be justfied on a generator-specific basis.

The refund would only look at transactions 2 Oct. 00 - 19 June 01.  Note that refund orders have already come out so presumably this recommendation would  lead to a modification of  those existing orders.

The modifications proposed to the June 19 order affect the refund caculation only; this does not change anything to the current mitigation rules.

To reiterate: the judges recommendation is just that and FERC has not yet ruled fromally.

More news to come.

Alan Comnes

US FERC-Ordered Calif Power Talks End Without Agreement

07/09/2001
Dow Jones Energy Service
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

WASHINGTON -(Dow Jones)- Federally mediated negotiations between the state of California and power providers ended Monday without an agreement settling the state's demand for refunds for alleged overcharges.

Throughout the fast track 15-day settlement conference California remained steadfast in its demand for $8.9 billion in refunds. But power providers offered a total of $716.1 million, according to the federal mediator overseeing the talks.

U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Chief Administrative Law Judge Curtis Wagner said at the close of talks Monday that he will recommend that the commission use its June 19 price-mitigation order to retroactively determine refunds due dating back to Oct. 2, 2000. Such an approach is expected to result in a total refund far less than the nearly $9 billion sought by the state.

The FERC ordered settlement conference "set the balls rolling," Wagner said. "In 15 days you can't work miracles," he said of the unresolved negotiations.

Wagner said he would recommend that FERC order a fast-track hearing of 60 days or less to address the disputed issues unresolved by the talks. He also said he would recommend alterations in the June 19 orders pricing methodology to address "problems" involving power plant heat rates, natural gas pricing and the cost of emissions permits.

Of the total $716 million in refund offers cited by Wagner, the so-called Big 5 Power Generators in California had offered $510 million. The remainder included $125 million offered by BC Hydro's Powerex, $49.6 million by a group of 15 power marketers, $16.5 million by six California municipal utilities and $25 million offered by "load serving entities" outside California.

"Many of the offers of settlement could with time result in an agreement," Wagner said.

Wagner also noted that California came "close to settlement" with Calpine Corp. (CPN) during the negotiations. Calpine Vice President Joe Roman told reporters that the agreement with California was "close to gelling."

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Here, at last, is the email response to the OT questions.  I haven't had a
chance to study it, but I am sending it "hot off the press"  upon receipt by
me.

Let's discuss if there are any problems.

Michelle

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------

Michelle Cash
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3823
Houston, Texas  77002
(713) 853-6401
michelle.cash@enron.com

This message may contain confidential information that is protected by the
attorney-client and/or work product privileges.
----- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 06/21/2000 04:14 PM -----

	"Thomson, Mary Lee" <MLThomson@LITTLER.com>
	06/21/2000 04:06 PM

		 To: "'Michelle Cash'" <michelle.cash@enron.com>
		 cc: "Notestine, Kerry" <KNotestine@littler.com>
		 Subject: Overtime Calculations

As we discussed on the telephone last week, the federal Fair Labor Standards
Act and Department of Labor regulations prescribe the calculation of the
regular rate of pay for overtime pay calculation.  Shift differentials and
other adjustments for working particular hours or on particular tasks are
included in the regular rate of pay.  If, as set forth in the e-mail
forwarded to me from Kerry, an employee is paid a shift differential for
night shift work, that differential becomes part of the regular rate of pay
for the night shift work.  If the same employee rotates between day and
night shifts, she/he will be working at two different rates of pay.  This is
acceptable but poses special issues for the calculation of overtime.

Federal law permits two methods of calculating overtime for employees who
work at two (or more) different regular rates of pay.  Employers may use
either a weighted average (29CFR 778.115) or a rate-in-effect (29CFR
778.419) calculation.

l. Weighted Average Calculation

This calculation involves add multiplying the number of hours worked in a
workweek at rate 1 times rate 1 and adding the sum to the number of hours
worked at rate 2 times the number of hours worked at rate 2.  The sum is
then divided by the total number of hours worked to obtain the weighted
average regular rate paid for each hour worked.  Overtime premiums of 1/2
the weighted average regular rate are then paid to bring the overtime rate
to 1.5 times the weighted average regular rate.   If, as in California,
double time rates apply, the premium would be one times the weighted average
regular rate.

Example:

Employee works four 8-hour day shifts at $10 per hour and two 8-hour night
shifts with a shift premium of $! per hour within the same workweek.

The weighted average calculation would be:

32 (hours) times 10 (dollars) plus 16 (hours) times 11 (dollars) = 496
(dollars)

496 (dollars) divided by 48 (hours) = $10.33 (the weighted average regular
rate)

1/2 of $10.33 = $5.17 (the additional overtime premium due for each overtime
hour worked).

The weekly pay for this employee would be:

$584.00 for straight time
$ 41.36 for overtime premium
or

$625.36 for the week.

2. Rate-in-effect
With this method, the overtime pay is calculated at the rate in effect at
the time the overtime is worked.

In the above example, if the last 8 hours of the week were worked on a day
shift, the overtime rate would be 1.5 x $10 or $15 and the employee would be
entitled to $120 in overtime pay.  If the last shift was worked on the night
shift, the overtime rate would be 1.5 x $11 or $16.50 and the employee would
be due $130 in overtime pay.

Please note: These are the federal standards.  State law must also be
considered, since the employee is entitled to the most favorable provision
is there is a conflict.  For example, California does not permit the use of
the rate-in-effect method; employees who work at different rates must be
paid on the weighted average overtime pay calculation.

I hope this is helpful.  Please do not hesitate to call if you questions or
need clarification.
Mary Lee Thomson
Sacramento, CA

----
This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use
of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply
email and delete all copies of this message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@littler.com

Littler Mendelson, P.C.
http://www.littler.com


I will be leaving the office at 12 today.  Dana should be here to assist you
in my absence.

Rufino


Version 2.0 of the ClickAtHome Portal is now available!
 Log into www.clickathome.net now, from work or home!

Access the PEP System through the portal!
 Choose your reviewers and fill out your evaluations in the comfort and
privacy of your home!

Outlook Web Access and eHRonline will be available SOON!

The ClickAtHome portal is fully customizable for you!
 YOU choose the content on each page, as well as the look and feel!

Note: the ClickAtHome portal must be launched through an Internet Explorer
browser, 5.0 or higher.


REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT
TO SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN FIRST COALITION/
KALAMAZOO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE JOINT EVENT
ON THE ECONOMY
Western Michigan University
Kalamazoo, Michigan

*********************************************************

Energy Issues are highlighted in bold text.


Greetings, Longhorns!

I just wanted to remind each of you of Wednesday evening's presentation on
campus.  Sally Beck will be giving a powerpoint presentation to the Net
Impact group on campus.  The presentation will take place in the Graduate
School of Business 2.122 from 6-7pm.  Please plan to meet me there at 5:30.
Business casual attire.

The group will serve Jason's Deli snacks at 6pm and Sally will begin her
presentation at approximately 6:15.  After the presentation, we will make
ourselves available to field any specific questions the students may have.

I have arranged for the following hotel accommodations:

La Quinta, Bergstrom Airport
512-386-6800

Jim: #18652728
Marcus: #18652733
Millie: #18652734

Please call and cancel if you will not require an over-night stay.

I appreciate your help!  On the day of the event I can be reached on my cell
phone: 281/793-1097.

Have a  great day!!

lexi
3-4585


This one looks even better.
PL

MGR DEAL STRUCTURING FEDERAL

ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS: The primary function of this position will be to lead
the evaluation and structuring of Federal privatization
transactions. This will include managing the internal risk assessment process
and drafting key contractual terms in our bid documents to
achieve the closing of Federal Solutions outsourcing transactions. Lead and
project-manage diverse Enron and third party human resources
in multiple geographic locations involved in the analysis, structuring,
pricing, negotiating and closing of complete energy outsourcing contracts
for clients in Federal market sectors. Lead and become hands-on involved in
the financial analysis, preparation of proposal documents,
responses to Requests For Information from the Federal clients, term sheets
and negotiation of business terms and definitive agreements
with the customer. Insure that the commodity, energy assets, management, and
finance functions have acquired accurate, in-depth customer
information in order to analyze and develop effective costing for the
proposed transactions. Drive value, clarity, creativity and innovation
within the deal-making process. Install value in transactions that address
customer needs and differentiate Enron Energy Services from
competitors. As a key member of the Federal Solutions outsourcing team, this
individual must contribute to the continuous improvement and
simplifying of Enron's deal structuring/management process.

ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS: Undergraduate degree in finance or accounting or
comparable graduate business school background. 7+
years experience working in finance/treasury/accounting functions.
Significant transaction experience including internal approval and external
negotiation processes. Must possess transactional savvy and a successful
track record of building strong relationships and leading within all
stages of the deal development process, including needs analysis, financial
and technical due diligence, proposal development, customer
interface and closing process. Creativity is important in the management of
the deal structuring/deal management process. Person must
creatively approach the outsourced deal and conceptualize new solutions which
solve clients' problems. Must be a strong analytical thinker
who applies this trait to effect individual tasks as well as overall process
improvement. Experience with and understanding of derivative
instruments, including swaps, options and the like. Extensive experience in
putting together complex solutions under long term arrangements.

PREFERRED SKILLS: MBA preferred. Federal or Military contracting experience
preferred. Self-starter with ability to handle multiple
projects simultaneously. Strong communication skills. Previous banking/credit
experience and/or CPA a plus. Person must have the
confidence, presence, and communication skills to work effectively at all
levels of an organization.

SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS: Overall business knowledge is critical in order to
fully realize the implications of providing outsourced
energy services and the effect these services have on the economics and the
day-to-day business of the Federal customers. Must see the
deal through and negotiate with senior officials and contracting officers.
Key performance measure will include development of profitable,
internally replicable deal structures, deal closing and earnings generation,
and adherence to Enron's Vision and Values.

CONTACT: To be considered for this position, do not contact the hiring
manager directly, send us your resume showing clearly how your
experience addresses each of the essential requirements listed. Please email
to eesjobs1@enron.com as plain text in the body of the
message or as a .doc or .txt attachment. Please indicate job number and title
of position you desire on the email subject line. Whether
emailing, faxing or mailing, Please eliminate Italics, underlining, multiple
margins or side-by-side columns.

Job ID
              0000103673

Department
              EES DEAL DEVELOPMENT

Company
              WHOLESALE, RETAIL & COMM
              ENRON ENERGY SERVICES

Location
              HOUSTON, TX

Type

Pay
              n/a

FLSA class

Manager
              THOMPSON,CHARLES

Recruiter
              LBURTON

Log
              n/a

Grade
              CS.06..M

Response
              NA

Relocation
              N

Posting date
              03-MAY-00


Dynegy: Enron a 'Model Competitor'
It doesn't happen very often, so we're noting an apparently spontaneous comment from Dynegy Counsel Ed Ross at a FERC Roundtable last week that one of his chief competitors, Enron, "has done an excellent job of being competitive." He suggested others could look to Enron as a "model competitor. They've done a very good job of setting up a strong financial desk and a strong physical desk and we don't see any problem with it. I think they have set up their books in a way that they truly have separation between the regulated and unregulated aspects of their business."
Ross had prefaced the remark, midway through a heated debate on affiliate abuses, with the comment that "this is not an industry-wide problem. I believe there are good and bad players in the market today."
Earlier, Enron's Leslie Lawner had invited "all of you to spend the day on Enron's trading floor, because I assure you, you will not see a more competitive environment anywhere. There is no way these folks, who fight like cats and dogs among themselves, would voluntarily transfer value to the pipeline group for the good of the bottom line." Lawner had to quickly back off the invitation - mentioning confidentiality restrictions - when it appeared about half the room was ready to troop over to the trading floor.


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 02/16/2001
11:43 AM ---------------------------

From:  Veronica Espinoza @ ENRON
               02/16/2001 09:36 AM

To: Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim S
Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melinda Whalen/CAL/ECT@ECT, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Janie Aguayo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Derek Bailey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
Meredith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ellen Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON, Celeste
Cisneros/NA/Enron@Enron, Diane Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron, Tiffany
Williams/NA/Enron@Enron, Cindy Feldman/CAL/ECT@ECT, Patricia
Boulanger/CAL/ECT@ECT, Linda Sietzema/CAL/ECT@ECT, Sharon
Crawford/CAL/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya
Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nidia
Mendoza/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT,
David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Walter Guidroz/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Veronica Gonzalez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean
Bell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Radous/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ken Curry/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Credit Report--2/16/01


green bay and chic under 39


Did you get this?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kristal, Yana
Sent:	Thursday, August 09, 2001 10:23 AM
To:	Dimitry, Dirk
Cc:	Causholli, Monika
Subject:	Indonesia country brief

Hopefully this helps!

Yana Kristal
Enron Industrial Markets
(713) 345-8497


Start Date: 4/30/01; HourAhead hour: 7;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001043007.txt
Error: Invalid variant type conversion

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTstCA
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/30/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_5001
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 7 / Preferred:   6.40 / Final:   6.30)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: SCE1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/30/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT on 03/09/2001
06:52 AM ---------------------------

Christopher McKey
03/09/2001 04:00 AM
Sent by: Christopher McKey
To: Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank W Vickers/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Phelps Dodge

Chris, Frank

Below the notes on the Phelps Dodge meeting of last week. Chris, I would like
to discuss later today if possible. Frank, thanks for your input. You will be
glad to hear that nothing much has changed there. If I didn't think PD was
such a strong take-over candidate, I would be shorting their stock massively.

--CM

The meeting with Phelps Dodge to further discuss their energy/metals
situation accomplished little. During the course of a 2 1/2 hour meeting with
Bill Brack (Head of Engineering, and therefore of energy
management/procurement) and Tim Summers plus Mike McElrath (two of his Energy
Managers) the following points were covered:

PD will build two new power plants, one in cooperation with Duke and the
other with BP Amoco. Both to be located in AZ, NM. Coal fired, ca 300 MW, gas
fired ca 250 MW. They will enter long term contracts for power off-take from
these power plants to meet their needs. Discussions with potential partners
have been on-going since last summer. PD sees investment in power plants as
the only answer to the power crunch. Gas has not yet been sourced. Enron not
consulted back then due to our non-asset strategy. Details deliberately vague
on their side.
PD's energy group is unable to discuss any transaction structures which
involve copper plays. We have probed this to death, and Summers finally
admitted that their board will not tolerate any suggestions that copper
upside be "sacrificed" to secure lower/stable priced power. The clear problem
they are experiencing--that energy price relative to copper price is killing
them--is being addressed as an energy price problem only. There is interest
but no mandate within PD's energy group to attempt to address the spread
issue.
Medium and long term energy risk management is limited to physical solutions.
Financial and cross commodity solutions "would never be approved by the
board".
PD continues to search for "5's and low 6's" on baseload power in a market
showing 7's and 8's. They remain 100 MW short, which is driving their
decision to curtail production. We put 5 year indicative low 6's on the table
through a combination of clipped profiles and calls on copper (at 90 cts/lb)
but the copper element in the structure sent them running.
After Brack left the room, Summers admitted that the energy group has done no
deals directly with ENA since Enron almost won the beauty contest to be their
energy partner two years ago, but included power procurement as an area of
value add in our presentation to their board, against the wishes of their
energy team. This clearly rubbed the energy guys the wrong way, and they
haven't forgotten it--too close to home, clearly.  I can only conclude that
PD's board would be in a much better position today had they taken Enron's
advice then.
A bit of insight (Frank, you'll enjoy this)--PD claims Enron offered "their
ideas, sold back to them" and "no upside" in our final energy partner
proposal to them two years ago. When I asked how their counter-proposal to
Enron back then (identified projects first put to tender--if Enron is low
bidder, Enron wins project) differed from free consulting, they had no answer.

Summary:
It is clear how PD got into their current energy fix. By admission of the
energy group, nothing much has changed in the last few years there, either in
terms of personnel or in terms of mandate. This, despite the fact that the
viability of a number of PD facilities is in doubt due to energy
mismanagement. Without top-down involvement, we will get no further with
their energy team.

We are currently finalising the energy-copper structure we discussed during
the meeting as I think it is the best option for them. I will also work
further with Foster in Portland to give them the straight commodity offer.
Perhaps this can serve as a focal point for future higher level discussions
outside the sphere of PD's energy group. Joe/Michael-- I will make sure you
get this, as Kalidas may yet have a role to play. It is unfortunate that the
approach PD uses to manage their copper position seems much more
sophisticated than their approach to energy. Results notwithstanding, the
meeting was surprisingly open and candid on their part--no harm done to the
metals part of the business.

Attached find quick-look results of our site analysis. Toured the Sierrita
mine, no easy indication it will be closed end of this month. Personnel
tight-lipped, though their head of environmental affairs lost little time in
asking for a job. I have asked Bucky to keep you informed of developments in
West Coast power, as I suspect their decision on facility closure (at least
Sierrita) will be determined by power price developments between now and end
March.

CM


I'm here...

"Cooper, Sean" <CooperS@EPEnergy.com> on 08/29/2000 01:27:32 PM
To:
cc:
Subject: PAB Deleted

My PAB file, or for the non technical among you, my Outlook Personal Address
Book was accidently deleted this week in an upgrade to Windows 2000 NT.
I have restored an old one, but it is several months, if not a whole year
out of date.
This is the first message to confirm the current address I have for you is
still active.
Please reply confirming you recieved it.
A second message will follow to try and replace some of the address's I know
I have lost.
Thanks for your help
Sean.

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from El Paso
Energy Corporation are confidential and intended solely
for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed. If you have received this email in error
please notify the sender.
******************************************************************


Sure Sue has filled you in, but just to be certain, my understanding is that
Dan Douglas, attorney for WPTF, is going to meet with the AG (not sure when)
in an attempt to narrow the scope of the subpoena.  Dan also plans to begin
drafting responses to the subpeona.  Since we are a member of WPTF and
therefore presumably covered by the subpoena, seems important that our
attorney's coordinate with Dan.  Sue, if I've mangled anything, let me know.

Best,
Jeff


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/20/2001 03:19 PM -----

	MDay <MDay@GMSSR.com>
	04/20/2001 03:08 PM

		 To: "'Jeff Dasovich  Enron SF'" <jdasovic@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: revised stip staying Energy Credit proceedings

Here is the revised stipulation.  Be advised that Dan Douglas is still
trying to modify it further to ensure we are paid on the basis of recorded
ISO settlements numbers instead of forecasts.  Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: JBennett
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 7:45 AM
To: MDay
Subject: FW: revised stip staying Energy Credit proceedings

-----Original Message-----
From: Read, Charles [mailto:cread@steptoe.com]
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 7:34 AM
To: 'jbennett@gmssr.com'
Subject: revised stip staying Energy Credit proceedings

Jeanne:  here is a revised stip that incorporates your requested language
regarding parties' rights to contest the advice filing.  I couldn't get the
track changes to work accurately so I will just tell you there are not
changes except for your paragraph which is the fourth from the last in the
document.  Let me know if this is now acceptable to Enron for filing.  (I am
still waiting to get APS' sign-off as well.)

 <<STIP STAYING PROCCEDINGS_v1.DOC>>

 - STIP STAYING PROCCEDINGS_v1.DOC


Attached is Transco's mark-up of our guaranty language for the Athens and
Hartwell generation project transportation agreements.  Let me know how we
should proceed.

---------------------- Forwarded by John Hodge/Corp/Enron on 03/02/2001 02:36
PM ---------------------------

"Anderson, Toi L" <Toi.L.Anderson@Williams.com> on 03/01/2001 09:01:29 PM
To: "'john.hodge@enron.com'" <john.hodge@enron.com>
cc: "Alvarado, Orlando" <Orlando.Alvarado@Williams.com>

Subject: Enron Guaranty

 <<Enron Corp Guaranty2.doc>>

John,

Attached are our comments to the Guranty.? Please let me know if this works
for your shop.

Thanks, Toi
713-215-4540

 - Enron Corp Guaranty2.doc