We need to sell all the EES all the time.
The imbalance is always zero...it doesn't matter what the beep prints(unless
its negative-then you can bet we will get charged!!!).

Any ideas, or advice for them?
Let me know.

Bill

---------------------- Forwarded by Bill Williams III/PDX/ECT on 04/12/2001
08:29 AM ---------------------------
To: Bill Williams III/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Daniel Kang/HOU/EES@EES, Jubran Whalan/HOU/EES@EES

Subject: CAISO Notice - Distribution of Funds for January Preliminary Invo ice

Bill,

We are still in a bad position with the ISO.  I have noticed that you have
not been able to sell all of our length in the real time market. Given the
below statement by the ISO we would ask your traders to get as aggressive as
possible on the sales (ie just sell it) . Receiving  cents on the dollar from
the ISO is not a sound business proposition for us.  Do you have any ideas,
we welcome your advice ....

Thanks

NFB
---------------------- Forwarded by Neil Bresnan/HOU/EES on 04/12/2001 07:22
AM ---------------------------

"Woertz, Byron" <BWoertz@caiso.com> on 04/11/2001 06:31:30 PM
To: ISO Market Participants
<IMCEAEX-_O=CAISO_OU=CORPORATE_CN=DISTRIBUTION+20LISTS_CN=ISO+20MARKET+20PARTI
CIPANTS@caiso.com>
cc: SC Settlements Contacts
<IMCEAEX-_O=CAISO_OU=CORPORATE_CN=DISTRIBUTION+20LISTS_CN=SCSETTLECONTACTS@cai
so.com>
Subject: CAISO Notice - Distribution of Funds for January Preliminary Invo ice

  ISO Market Participants:
  Cash clearing related to the preliminary invoice for January
2001 was scheduled for April 3, 2001.  Due to a shortfall in receipts from
market debtors, the ISO was required to perform calculations in accordance
with ISO Tariff Section 11 and Settlements and Billing Protocol ("SABP")
Section 6 to determine the appropriate pro-rata distributions to scheduling
coordinators.  These calculations have been completed, and a distribution of
available funds was made today.
  A total distribution of $5,980,329 was made against accounts
payable of $835,450,697, resulting in a pay-out percentage of 0.7%.  Total
market related collections were $12,952,985, which were reduced to the
$5,940,329 to cover GMC short-payments and other adjustments.
  The ISO will provide a comprehensive reporting of the
January preliminary settlement later this week, and will thereafter
distribute a current certification of amounts owed.
  Phil Leiber
  Dir. Financial Planning & Treasurer
  California ISO
  916 351-2168
  916-351-2259 (fax)

  Byron B. Woertz, Jr.
  Director, Client Relations
  (916) 608-7066
  (800) 481-7037 - Pager


I need to leave the office at 5 pm today.  Sara


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 02/23/2001 03:02
PM ---------------------------

Ernie@ECT
02/23/2001 03:01 PM
Sent by: Ernie@ECT
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Class Confirmation - Wellhead to Burner Tip

You are now enrolled in:

Wellhead to Burner Tip
Class Days and Times:
  4/24/2001  08:00:00 AM - 05:00:00 PM
  4/25/2001  08:00:00 AM - 12:00:00 PM
Room # & Location: EB 552,  Houston
Note:

Click this doclink to review class session information.

If you are unable to attend this class, the registration must be canceled by
5:00 p.m. on  April 19, 2001 to prevent a charge of $ 600 to your RC number.

 We look forward to seeing you at 08:00:00 AM on April 24 - 25, 2001.  Please
call the Development Center Team at 713-853-0357 if you have any questions.

 Thank you.


Sorry about the delay in getting back to you. I would do a separate heading.
I am not sure who needs to approve this other than me. When Whalley was head
trader and COO, he approved. I do not know if it should be Lavo or Delainey.
If you know, send it to me and I will get it signed. If you are uncertain, my
paralegal, Linda Guinn, will find out.

	Greg Johnston
	07/20/2000 11:31 AM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Dan Dietrich/CAL/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Enron North America Tape Retention Policy

Richard, further to my voice-mail, I was just following up as to how you
would like to proceed with addressing Enron Canada Corp. in the new tape
retention policy.  As I had indicated, Rob Milnthorp has requested that the
following two Enron Canada positions have authority to approve the listening
of voice recordings in the Calgary office, on behalf of Enron Canada Corp.:

Chief Executive Officer
Head of Trading

Rob's preference is not to specify particular persons but to identify the
titles instead.

Can you let me know how you would like to address this issue.  I would think
it is merely a matter of adding these two positions to the schedule
identifying who has authority to approve the listening of the tapes.  The
only problem is that the "Managing Director" wording could conflict with the
title identification that Rob wants to use for Enron Canada.  Perhaps in that
schedule, we could add a separate heading for Enron Canada.

Thanks

Greg


Answers to your quetions:
Yes; no; maybe

Just kidding....
Interconnects for Calp and Dayton handled the same...just add those meters to
the sell tkts to CES and the buys are the delivery points.  Don't path the
actual contract in Unify...When we hold that capacity and EDI, we'll path in
Unify.... We don't get the bills from TCO  in January for that contract.  Get
em in February (when we hold the capacity).  They are set up in Unify but we
won't actually use....We are providing that service for those guys.

Try  your best for trueing up the transport tkts and the CALP and Dayton tkts
in Sitara.  Impact is on P and L for the desk daily and later on for the
(O/A) operational analysis where the accountants compare what we estimated
our costs and revenues for the desk were and what they actually came in
at.......We know January will be messy...

Go ahead and true up the PAL agreement to match physical flow......

BUY/SELLS with ENA and CES.  We talked at the beginning of the month about
this.  Sales/buys  to/from ENA on the CES reports and sales/buys to/from CES
on the ENA facilitation by location reports should just be pahted as
buy/sells.  (hopefully should be done already......)

I have a meeting from 3-4 today...other than that I'll be downstairs with
y'all to answer any questions....

THANKS!!!!

To: Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON@ECT, Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine
L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Dayton Stuff & Calp & other fun stuff

You were a busy little bee last night!!!! Thanks for the help.

FSS 63304 - we are not using. I'll ask John Hodge what this storage had been
used for in the past.

Clarification needed for the Dayton and Calp sell at the pool. How is the
interconnect gas supply done... we had some on Calp with Virginia Power and
Coral. In the past we have some on Dayton... don't think we have any in
January yet. Does this through another monkey wrench into the works?

We will probably have to run some report out of navigator to true-up
transport tickets. There are a ton of cuts lately and Joann receives daily
request from CES retail for volume changes. Not sure the best, efficient way
to maintain these tickets daily.

PAL for CES was physically flowed on January 1. Should we change the tickets
to match physical flow???

I'm bummed about the storage ticket change again... but will redo the paths.
This will be a couple hours of rework for me... not sure about Joann.

You have lost me on the ENA to CES and CES to ENA buy sell tickets. Can't
think of any examples yet. Hope this doesn't cause repathing.

Victor Lamadrid@ECT
01/18/2000 09:38 PM
To: Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joan Veselack/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Dayton Stuff & Calp & other fun stuff

Hello my favorite TCO people:  Here's what we here at team TCO have done so
far....Let's recap shall we..........

Dayton and Calp get the invoices from the p/l and we re-imburse them for the
transport differenentials so......

Dayton capacity buy at the citygate = Sitara #151878 - path as buy/sell with
your markets.
Dayton capacity sell at the pool = Sitara #151877 - path as buy sell from
pool.  These 2 tkts  should be released  by Stephanie tomorrow morning.  True
these up as best you can daily.

Also:
Calp capacity buy at the citygate = Sitara #149776 - path as buy/sell wth
your markets.
Calp capacity sell at the pool = Sitara #149775 - path as buy/sell at pool.
These 2 tkts should be released by Stephanie tomorrow morning.  True these up
as best you can daily.

Our transport tkts from pool to city gate for all other transport still
remains Sitara# 95448 and Sitara# 95449.   Please true up as best you can.

NEXT:
Do ya'll have 2 FSS Storages Contracts # 51407 and 63304?

Deal # 151879 covers storage K# 63304 and deal # 151880 covers storage K#
51407.  The Sitara gods have to approve, bounce the server and then it will
appear in Unify for you to path....

Deal # 149778 is the storage w/d ticket for both K# 63304 and K#51407.   Deal
# 151882 is the storage injection ticket for the same.  The counterparty had
to be changed back to CPR storage.  You guys have to unpath and re-path that
piece showing the purchase from CES for the storage w/d.  Really SORRY about
this!!!  Counterparty could not be CES --- We can't path on stg. contract and
out of inventory and buy from CES at the same time w/o the point not being
balanced.

Park and Lend contract #64031 and # 64041 are being set up by Chris in Sitara
but we have to get the Sitara gods to set up PAL contracts as ENA agency
deals for CES so he can't put the deals in the system just yet.  They should
be available tomorrow hopefully!!!!  They are for 250,000 on the first and
the 300,000 on the second of January.  Path them accordingly depending on
where that PAL gas went.

In addition all deals that are ENA to CES or CES to ENA should be pathed as
buy/sells.

I think that is it for now.  Let me know if anything else stops you from
pathing, running tracking and balancing and finally from bridging back the
first  to Sitara. Let's set a GOAL to have the first totally pathed and
tracked and balanced and bridged back and clean by close of business the
19th. YEAH BABY!!!!

By the way, we really appreciate the monumental effort you three have made in
meeting all logistical requirements of the old and new TCO business and
keeping track of the volumes in Sitara, Unify and Navigator...We're are
zeroing in on end of month balance tie outs between Navigator and Sitara for
the 4 CES pools and the 2 ENA pools.  We've kept a bunch of balls in the air
for the last 4 weeks and to my knowledge haven't dropped one darn ball yet.
Thanks.........


https://securecards.chase.com/servlet/at?target=shellapp&creative=a507

As a reader of TheStreet.com, you've been invited to receive this
special offer from Chase Manhattan Bank. Chase is bringing you
another great deal - this time for the Shell Platinum MasterCardc from
Chase. You'll earn unlimited free FormulaShellc gasoline:

A 5% rebate on Shell gasoline purchases made in the U.S.
A 1% rebate on all other purchases made with your Shell Platinum
MasterCard
A low 5.99% APR* on purchases and balance transfers

And all with no annual fee*. That's a super value from a card with two
great names.  Apply today and start saving with every gallon you pump.

https://securecards.chase.com/servlet/at?target=shellapp&creative=a507

Sincerely,

Michael J. Barrett
President
Chase Manhattan Bank USA, NA

*See Important Notices for details.

Chase, The Right Relationship Is Everything.

-------------------------------------------------

This special promotion was a result of a partnership between
TheStreet.com and Chase Manhattan Bank.  The email you have
received was sent to you by TheStreet.com. Please be assured
that we respect the privacy of our readers. To view our
privacy policy, click here:
http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/about/privacy.html

If you would like to be excluded from receiving these types of
offers in the future, please send an email to members@thestreet.com
with the subject line "No Exclusive Offers."


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 11/06/2000
05:58 PM ---------------------------

Robert Johnston
11/06/2000 04:07 PM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Scott Tholan/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Coffee/Cocoa

Our insights into the byzantine world of coffee and cocoa.

RJ


Shona -

To share with the others our telephone discussion, the notification template
was not my request, it was requested directly by Skilling.  I know your group
is working hard to meet mangagement expectations, and in accordance with your
request below, Market Risk is happy to help you transition into this revised
reporting format by reviewing the template prior to your distribution until
you are comfortable with the reporting requirements.   The new P/L
notification limits and limit changes that will be in effect  next Tuesday
should dramatically decrease the number of notifications, so that should
help.  It probably makes sense to re-distribute the policy to your business
unit controllers and the traders so they understand the policy requirements.

Another issue that we discussed yesterday is the source of the violation
explanations.  These should be provided to you by the head trader of that
commodity group.  Under the policy, that commodity group manager is
responsible for compliance with the risk management policy for the
commodities under his responsibility, along with the head of the energy ops
for that commodity group.  If the traders are not providing these
explanations to you or to your counterparts (ops desk head / business unit
controller), I'll be happy to send them an e-mail explaining their compliance
obligation under the policy.  Why don't you talk to each of the business unit
controllers, consider whether a process is already in place for this feedback
(as I understand it is for Global Products, for example), and if you'd like
me to send an e-mail to whoever you're having difficulty with, I will - just
let me know who.  Our Market Risk desk heads will be happy to review their
explanations, but the problem is, they can see whether they're short or long
and how the market moved in comparison, but it's the trader that can and
should explain why they took a position, whether they're adjusting it based
on the market moves, etc..

Let me know what else I can do to help streamline the process.

Regards,
Cassandra.

---------------------- Forwarded by Cassandra Schultz/NA/Enron on 12/07/2000
09:48 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Shona Wilson                           12/07/2000 09:42 AM

To: Cassandra Schultz/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Michael Benien/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Chris Abel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel
Falcone/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Veronica Valdez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: 12/5 Limit Violations and Notifications - Comments

Dear Cassandra,

In looking at the comments below there are several errors made buy us, one in
the template itself, and some suggestions.  At your request, we have started
to prepare this in addition to the normal word violation/notification memos
and our other work.  As you have certain requests and requirements, it would
be helpful for someone in your group to review it before it went out to
ensure it meets your requirements.

Please let me know if this is workable and who the reviewer should be.

Thanks,

Shona

To: Michael Benien/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Chris Abel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shona
Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron, Daniel Falcone/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Veronica Valdez/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: 12/5 Limit Violations and Notifications - Comments

I realize this has already gone out, but I see a few errors that we should
correct  - and actually, I think we should call Skilling and Lay's (and
Buy's) assistants (Veronica will handle this) and see if we can just hand
deliver to them a corrected version early this morning, e-mail is OK for Ted,
David and I. I have a few other suggestions on format/reporting changes as
well.

The NA Power VaR of $51MM was not 105% over its VaR limit of $50 - that would
have been $52.5 to require a report to Skilling, (but if we had had to report
it, don't use "WSCC", try to spell out or just don't use)
UK Gas's VaR limit is not $4, it's $7.5MM
I can't tie in UK Gas' QTD and YTD P/L - shouldn't it be what's on the DPR,
adjusted for the portion of the structured derivatives that is gas - call
over to that Yeo person and get the info. from them please
The 2nd item for NA Gas shouldn't be listed like that as it looks like
another violation - the comment re: the VaR increase was mean to go at the
bottom under RAC comments
The Finance Committe Chairman notification for Agg. VaR is not 100%, it's
115% (notification requirement box)
EES had a VaR violation - $7.5 vs. 7 - that is a Skilling level violation
Let's have the "Re:" say "Limit Violations and Notifications for December 5,
2000"
Let's number them all sequentially rather than starting over at each level

Veronica will call you to coordinate re-distribution.

Going forward, we need to increase our level of review for these as they're
getting a lot of scrutiny given market dynamics and our increasing risk.

Thank you,
Cassandra.

---------------------- Forwarded by Cassandra Schultz/NA/Enron on 12/07/2000
07:38 AM ---------------------------

Michael Benien
12/06/2000 07:08 PM
To: Kenneth Lay/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff
Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rick
Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen K Heathman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Cassandra Schultz/NA/Enron@Enron, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Port/Market Risk/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Chris Abel/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: 12/5 Limit Violations and Notifications


Dear All,

I've reattached the FAQ Sheet as the original did not save from my hard drive.

Thanks
Cathy

Human Resources
Enron Metals & Commodity Corp.
520 Madison Ave., 28th Floor
New York, NY 10022
Tel: 212-715-5276
Fax: 212-715-5231
E-Mail: Catherine.Huynh@Enron.com

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Huynh, Catherine
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 2:01 AM
To:	Gold, Joe; Lynch, Drew; Parra, Marcelo; Bacon, Philip; Kingsley, Sophie
Cc:	Cash, Michelle; Palmer, Lizzette
Subject:	FW: Voluntary Severance Program Info Packet

Dear All:

The following program details have been reviewed/approved by our legal team and has been distributed to all our US employees to kick off the Metals NA Voluntary Separation Program.  We are still finalizing legal due diligence to determine if a similar voluntary program can be rolled out in Montreal and should have an answer on this shortly.

Also attached for your reference is the Plan Document for the Voluntary Separation Program.  This will be circulated for signatures in the next two days.

Please let me know if you have any questions. << File: 10.22.01 VSP Plan Doc.doc >>

Regards,
Cathy
Human Resources
Enron Metals & Commodity Corp.
520 Madison Ave., 28th Floor
New York, NY 10022
Tel: 212-715-5276
Fax: 212-715-5231
E-Mail: Catherine.Huynh@Enron.com

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Huynh, Catherine
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 1:49 AM
To:	DL-NYMetals - Enron Metals at 520 Madison; DL-NYMetals - St. Louis Enron Metals; DL-NYMetals - Chicago Enron Metals
Cc:	Simpkin, Georgina
Subject:	Voluntary Severance Program Info Packet

Further to the All Employee meeting on Thursday, October 18, 2001, the attached documents will provide you with details of how the Program is laid out.

Four documents are attached for your reference:

1)	The Program Summary Description is provided to give you an overview.
2)	The Payment Calculator will calculate an estimate of what your voluntary separation would be.
3)	The FAQ Sheet will cover most of your general questions regarding the application process and post-separation questions.
4)	Application for voluntary separation.

If you have any further questions after review of these documents please feel free to contact me.  Certainly, if you would like to discuss your individual situation privately please contact me directly or Georgi Simpkin to schedule a meeting time in a private conference room.

 << File: 10.22.01 Program Summary Description.doc >>  << File: Payment Calculator.xls >>  << File: 10.22.01 FAQs.doc >>  << File: Application.doc >>

Cathy
Human Resources
Enron Metals & Commodity Corp.
520 Madison Ave., 28th Floor
New York, NY 10022
Tel: 212-715-5276
Fax: 212-715-5231
E-Mail: Catherine.Huynh@Enron.com


Have you solicited comments fromo EES?
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/HOU/EES on 08/15/2000 08:00
AM ---------------------------

	Enron Energy Services

	From:  Ginger Dernehl                           08/14/2000 11:41 AM
	Phone No: 713 853-7751

To: Government Affairs
cc: Information & Administration, Regulatory Risk Analysis & Competitive
Analysis
Subject: Request for Comments

Please see the attached e:mail below from Nancy Hetrick and respond directly
to her.

thanks

gngr
---------------------- Forwarded by Ginger Dernehl/HOU/EES on 08/14/2000
11:40 AM ---------------------------

Nancy Hetrick
08/14/2000 11:15 AM

To: Ginger Dernehl/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Jeff Brown/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Request for Comments

Ginger, would you please forward the following request to the State Goverment
Affairs group for me.  Thanks.

Attached for your review and comments is the second group of recommended
practices worked on by the UBP group.  The Suppliers that have participated
in the UBP plan to submit joint comments to this report and I would like to
be able to incorporate any comments that individuals in Enron's State
Government Affairs Group may have into the overall Supplier comments.  In
order to meet the deadline for comments, I need to receive your comments no
later than noon, August 28th.  The best way to submit these comments is by
red-lining the actual document.

You can also review and download the entire UBP report, including the
finalized chapters and the chapters "out for comments", on
http://www.ubpnet.org/workshop/download.htm.

Please feel free to contact me (712-366-3399 or pager 888-912-1426) if you
have any questions.  Thanks for your time and consideration.


The NNG/TW 4th Qtr. Forecast Review with the Officers has been rescheduled
from Thursday, Dec. 7th to:

    Date: Friday, December 8th
                  Place: EB-49C2
    Time: 1:30 - 2:30 pm

If you have any questions please call me at x31437.  Thanks!


Gerald,

Have you gotten a chance to look over the ROW document?  It seems to be a pretty standard agreement.  If possible, we would like to get this finalized soon.  Once we hit the middle of Dec, it will probably be harder to get anything done.

Let me know if you have any questions on the agreement.

Thanks,

Rakhi
x3-7871


The meters listed in the attached email will be shut-in in order to pig the
Baytown 12".  The meters will be shut-in early on the morning of August 15,
and remain shut-in for approximately five to ten days.

If you have any questions please call me 36449.

Thanks
Gary Hanks
Mgr Gas Control
---------------------- Forwarded by Gary A Hanks/HOU/ECT on 08/01/2000 10:44
AM ---------------------------

Mike Vollmering@ENRON
08/01/2000 08:59 AM
To: Gary A Hanks/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jill T Zivley/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: James McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Flavin/GCO/Enron@ENRON, Liberty Team
HPL/GCO/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Baytown 12''

The Columbus Energy Wiggins #1 (989634) will be effected by the pigging
project. The tap valve is installed in the MLV bypass and the bypass will be
removed to blow down the line.

Here is a list of all the Producers that will be effected.
Columbus Energy -------- Wiggins #1 (989634) and Fig Orchard (986764)
Sanchez O&G -------------- Worthen (989822) and Highlander #1 (989760)
ETOCO ----------------------- Hargrove Cmpt. (989651)
Highlands Pipeline Co.-- (989758)

The total volume from this production is 24 -25mmcf/d.

Please call if you need more 281-652-2510.

Thanks;  Mike


Greetings:

With California enjoying a brief respite from Legislative antics, we plan to
cancel tomorrow's California call and will reconvene on Thursday.

However, if anyone has pressing matters or information they'd like to discuss
tomorrow, we'll go ahead with the call.  Let me know.

If I've missed anyone with this note, please forward along.  Thanks.

Best,
Jeff


The report named: NG - PROPT P/L <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=11&report_name=NG+-+PROPT+P/L&category_cd=5&category_name=FINANCIAL&toc_hide=1&sTV1=5&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=11/26/2001>, published as of 11/26/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/09/2001
11:05 AM ---------------------------

Christie Patrick
04/09/2001 10:39 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth Parkhill/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Rice Students

Hi Vince and Ken!

Thanks for the opportunity to meet the Rice ALP students--Great group!!!

Regarding the meeting with Steve Kean,  this week looks tough, but I'm trying
for a few minutes this afternoon to at least say "hello"--if it happens at
all, it will be at 3:30 or 5p today.  I'll let you know Immediately when I
can confirm.  Then, we can schedule something for next week when the students
can have a more thorough discussion with Steve.

Thanks!!

--Christie.


We have received the executed Confidentiality agreement with Human Code, Inc.
dated May 3, 2000.  Copies will be distributed to Dave Samuels and Bob Shults.


Rosemary Gracey
Marketing - 402/398-7431
rosemary.gracey@enron.com


TKirchman@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:

The NYISO is reserving hours beginning 15:00-16:00 and 19:00-21:00 in the
September 7, 2001
Real-Time Market as well as the following hours per ECA 20010608B to verify
prices:

HQ:  6:00, 13:00, 17:00
NE:  6:00, 13:00, 17:00
OH:  6:00, 13:00, 17:00
PJM: 6:00, 13:00, 17:00

Prices in the September 8, 2001 Day-Ahead Market are correct.

This e-mail information is a copy of the official posting which can be
found at the following address of our website:
http://mis.nyiso.com/public/htm/OperMessages/CurrentOperMessages.htm#mm


Same as below with the following exceptions

Pipeline CGAS
Contract 64031
Firmness IT
Service Type Park & Loan
Rate  PAL
Term Type Term
Eff Date  1/1/2000 - 1/31/2000  Evergreen

Pipeline CGAS
Contract 64041
Firmness IT
Service Type Park & Loan
Rate  PAL
Term Type Term
Eff Date  1/1/2000 - 1/31/2000  Evergreen

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 01/19/2000 08:06
AM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
01/18/2000 07:08 PM
To: Sylvia A Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda H Fletcher/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: CGAS Pals agreements

Please set up the following CGAS contracts.  Please note; ENA is agent for CES

Pipeline CGAS
Contract 64031
Firmness IT
Service Type Storage Service
Rate  ISS
Term Type Term
Eff Date  1/1/2000 - 1/31/2000  Evergreen

Pipeline CGAS
Contract 64041
Firmness IT
Service Type Storage Service
Rate  ISS
Term Type Term
Eff Date  1/1/2000 - 1/31/2000  Evergreen


Ed:

Can you send me a list of PSEG entities that will be parties to the master netting agreement, together with a list of master you think exist?  Also, Steve Van Hooser will be the lawyer working on this document, so he will need credit information to complete the documentation.

Thanks!

Marie


These are the conference coverage by international newswires.

----- Forwarded by Mika Watanabe/AP/Enron on 05/16/2001 01:08 AM -----

	Enron Media Cuttings@ECT
	Sent by: Iona Maclean@ECT
	05/15/2001 08:41 PM

		 To: Joseph P Hirl/AP/ENRON@ENRON, Nicholas O'Day/AP/Enron@Enron, Jonathan
Whitehead/NA/Enron@Enron, Mika Watanabe/AP/Enron@Enron, Jackie
Gentle/LON/ECT@ECT, Fiona Grant/LON/ECT@ECT, Eva Hoeffelman/LON/ECT@ECT, John
Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Michael R Brown/LON/ECT@ECT, David
Leboe/Enron@EnronXGate, John Ambler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt,
seguchi@21stenergy.com, uchida@21stenergy.com, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Enron says high power rates costing Japan- Reuters

JAPAN:
Enron says high power rates costing Japan.

05/15/2001
Reuters English News Service
(C) Reuters Limited 2001.

TOKYO, May 15 (Reuters) - A senior executive of U.S. energy giant Enron Corp
said on Tuesday that Japan could save an estimated four trillion yen ($32.45
billion) in annual costs if electricity rates were cut to the average of
members of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).

"If you were to pare Japanese industrial electric rates to the OECD
average...savings to all...customers would be about four trillion yen per
year," Enron Corp Vice President Steven Kean told a seminar in Tokyo.
Speaking at a seminar on electric power deregulation, Kean said that
indigenous factors such as steep land prices and a lack of natural energy
resources were often blamed for Japan's high electricity rates.

But he said these factors were not sufficient to explain Japan's high
electricity rates.

A report commissioned by Enron Japan Corp showed that in 1998 Japan's
electricity rates for industrial users were 16.81 yen per kilowatt hour (kWh)
compared to a second highest rate of 12.44 yen in Italy.

Japan's business sector has expressed concern at the nation's high electricity
rates, saying that it blunts their competitive edge on the international
market.

Kean also drew parallels between Japan, in the midst of deregulation, and
California which has been suffering from a power shortage since deregulating
its market in 1998.

These included the length of time that authorities in Japan took to issue
permits to allow the construction of new power plants, he said.

"The regulatory structure in Japan is very strict...just like in California,"
Kean said.

North America's biggest buyer and seller of electricity, Enron gained its
first foothold in Japan in 1999 when it established affiliate E Power Corp.

In April of last year, it set up subsidiary Enron Japan Corp.

Kean urged Japan to step up measures to open up its power market, a process he
said held many benefits.

Japan is in the process of deregulating its power market. Since March last
year, large-lot consumers have been free to chose their suppliers. The measure
liberalised an estimated 30 percent of the power market and ended Japan's 10
power utilities regional monopoly.

However, industry watchers note that there have been very few new entrants and
that further deregulation measures must be taken for rates to fall. The
Japanese government is due to review the process in 2003.

Folder Name: Enron Reuters folder
Relevance Score on Scale of 100: 9


FYI

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Balfour-Flanagan, Cyndie
Sent:	Thursday, July 19, 2001 11:46 AM
To:	Wallumrod, Ellen; Hernandez, Elizabeth L.
Cc:	Dickson, Stacy E.; Hodge, Jeffrey T.; Baxter, Bryce; Anderson, Bridgette; Bryan, Linda S.; Campos, Sylvia A.; Elledge, Susan; Gonzales, Sharon; Hilliard, Marlene; Landau, Georgi; Richardson, Stacey
Subject:	CES Deals

I know that the confusion around CES seems to linger without hope of ever going away. Well, there may be light at the end of this seemly never ending tunnel.

We are in the process of terminating non-assigned CES contracts. This due to the fact that ENA is not party to these agreements & are only acting as agent on behalf of CES, in short - - - - "We are not CES". We don not want to be CES, we are Enron North America Corp. [BE ENRON PROUD :o)]

Based on this. New deals should not be negotiated or entered into Sitara as CES - [Counterparty] and CES deals should not be extended. If negotiations or customer relationships are ongoing with these "CES - counterparties" they should either return consent on the CES agreement or have a new ENA agreement put in place and then managed as ENA, not CES.

Within the next week, all CES - contracts (those for which ENA has not received consent) will be suspended in Global and therefore not available to Sitara. Unify will be able to continue to settle any existing deals under CES; but Sitara will not allow a deal to be amended and reconnected to the CES contract without prior coordination (and approval of legal where deemed applicable). Furthermore, we will not be generating GTC under CES to create a Sitara record for the CES deal to connect to.

Desk changes & deal corrections may continue where appropriate, but again, there will need to be prior coordination with the Global Contracts group. Corrections, do not mean deal extensions or deal roll-overs or new deals.

This information has been confirmed & the intent approved by legal. The reason for this again is - - - - "We are not CES" and these deals need to be moved off of the CES books and onto ours if the negotiations and relationships with the counterparty are ongoing.

If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at 713-853-1443 or you may also contact Stacy Dickson or Jeff Hodge in legal.

Thank you!
Cyndie


Start Date: 1/7/02; HourAhead hour: 19;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002010719.txt


---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 07/19/2001
12:59 PM ---------------------------

"RED Index Team" <distribution@caem.org> on 07/18/2001 01:01:03 PM
Please respond to <netkin@caem.org>

To: <Steven_J_Kean@enron.com>

cc:

Subject: RED Index shows Texas, NY, and Maine advance on retreating
Pennsylvania

Note to Steven Kean

The July Update to the Retail Energy Deregulation Index (RED Index),
published twice a year by the Center for the Advancement of Energy Markets
(CAEM) shows Texas, Maine, and New York are making the most measurable
strides in promoting sustainable competition among electricity providers, as
customers throughout Pennsylvania retreat to their default providers due to
increasing wholesale prices.

The RED Index, which is the only known tool that objectively ranks states by
22 attributes on how they are restructuring their power markets, today
released the U.S. rankings for all 50 states and the District of Columbia,
in a 187 page report.  Key results included:
   1. Pennsylvania      66
   2. Texas         65
   3. New York         64
   4. Maine         62
   17. California         34

"These numbers underscore the importance of building a healthy foundation on
which electric competition can grow," said Ken Malloy, CEO of the Center.

"While California's crisis has brought a lot of positive attention to
Pennsylvania's model, many customers in the Keystone State are returning to
their original utility suppliers.  It underscores how important it is to put
the right fundamentals in place if consumers and suppliers are to benefit
over the long haul," Malloy said.

In rankings that included all of North America, the province of Alberta
actually would rank above all the states with a score of 68.

The mid-year RED Index also found that 62% of states expressing an opinion
indicated that their commission is not "less likely to take action on energy
restructuring as a result of the California crisis."

CAEM is an independent, nonprofit, think tank based in Washington, DC whose
mission is to promote an effective transition from the monopoly to the
competitive model of regulation.

For information about obtaining a copy of the RED Index, go to www.caem.org.

For more information, please contact:
Nancy Etkin at 703-532-6887 or netkin@caem.org

If you do not wish to receive announcements from CAEM, please put "remove"
in the subject line in a reply to this email.
477


Per Rod's comments, are we comfortable with the following three names as
off-line reference entities?

---------------------- Forwarded by John Metzler/LON/ECT on 03/05/2000 18:44
---------------------------

	From:  Rod Nelson                           02/05/2000 23:52

To: Tomas Valnek/LON/ECT@ECT, John Metzler/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: approvals

      trading cp approval  reference credit approval

Ultramar Corp.     approved $5MM  approved $5MM

Petro-Canada    approved $5MM  approved $5MM

Louis Dreyfus Corp.    approved $5MM  approved $5MM

I assume that you will also seek approval from Legal.  I am still evaluating
Preem.

Rod


Bob,

This e-mail describes the tax consequences arising from Enron North America
Corp. ("ENA") offering to sell various pulp and paper products ("Products")
through EnronOnline ("EOL") to counterparties throughout Europe whereby such
Products would be stored in bonded warehouses located in the Netherlands.  As
I understand, it is intended that any ENA counterparty located in Europe will
be able to purchase Products from ENA and obtain physical possession of such
Products by taking delivery within bonded warehouses located in the
Netherlands that are owned by unrelated parties to whom ENA would make
payments for providing storage space.  The tax consequences arising from
ENA's sales of Products in the Netherlands are described below.  (I will
follow-up as soon as possible to provide you with the tax consequences
arising from ENA engaging in the same activity in Belgium.)

Sales within a bonded warehouse in The Netherlands

In general, sales of Products by ENA in the Netherlands may be subject to
taxation in both the United States and the Netherlands, thus resulting in a
combined effective tax rate equal to at least 58 percent.  By selling
Products in a specific manner, however, ENA can substantially limit its
exposure to taxation in the Netherlands and, by doing so, should only be
subject to U.S. taxation (at a rate equal to 35 percent).

To limit its exposure to Dutch taxation on the sale of Products stored in a
bonded warehouse in the Netherlands that is owned by an unrelated party, ENA
should comply with all of the following criteria:

Other than the limited activity to be performed on behalf of ENA by the owner
of the bonded warehouse ("Warehouseman") described below, all of ENA's
activities related to the sale of Products to a counterparty should occur in
the United States.  For example, the pricing for the Products to be offered
should be determined by an ENA employee physically located in the U.S.  If
any negotiations occur between ENA and a counterparty, the ENA employee
engaged in negotiations should be physically located in the United States.
If a contract is entered into between the parties, an ENA employee should
execute the document while physically present in the United States.  (As I
understand, those transactions effected through EOL occur by the counterparty
making an offer (i.e., clicking on the "offer" icon contained in EOL) and are
accepted by ENA if (among other things) the price related to the
counterparty's offer is still valid.  If this is the case, then ENA's
"acceptance" should be considered to occur in the U.S. if the individual with
the authority to set prices is physically located in the U.S. when actually
setting the price.)
ENA should enter into an agreement with the Warehouseman located in the
Netherlands whereby the Warehouseman's only activities on behalf of ENA
consist of storing the Products and making them available to the counterparty
to take physical delivery at the warehouse.  The Warehouseman should not have
the authority to engage in any other activity on behalf of ENA, including
(but not limited to):

  a.  negotiating any of the terms of the agreement between ENA and the
counterparty;
  b.  concluding any agreement between ENA and the counterparty on behalf of
ENA;
  c.  soliciting or receiving orders from a counterparty on behalf of ENA
(and transmitting such orders back to ENA); and
  d.  delivering Products to counterparties on behalf of ENA.

Thus, for ENA to mitigate its risk of exposure to Dutch tax on sales of
Products in the Netherlands, the Warehouseman should engage in only two
activities on behalf of ENA:  storing the Products for a fee, and making such
Products available to counterparties to take possession of them at the
warehouse.  All other activities related to the sale of Products in the
Netherlands should be undertaken by ENA in the United States.

If you have any questions, please contact me at ext. 35777.

Best regards,

Jeff


Judith E. Cox
Administrative Clerk
New York Independent System Operator
518-356-6233
jcox@nyiso.com
----- Forwarded by Judith Cox/NYISO on 07/30/2001 02:21 PM -----

                    Mike Hogan
                    <mhogan@cenhu        To:     jcox@nyiso.com
                    d.com>               cc:     "Dahl, Curt"
                                         <cdahl@keyspanenergy.com>
                    07/30/2001           Subject:     NYSRC ICAP WG MEETING ON AUG 2
                    02:01 PM

The ICAP Working Group of the New York State Reliability Council
("NYSRC") is posting this message to inform all interested parties of
the ability participate, on a "listen-only" basis, in the NYSRC ICAP
Working Group Conference Call No. 10 scheduled for August 2, 2001,
starting at 9:00A.M.  Attached in Word format is the Agenda for this
meeting.  The Working Group is an open meeting in accordance with NYSRC
Policy No. 2, which is available of the NYSRC web site at
"www.nysrc.org", on the "Policies" web page.

Those wishing to participate on a "listen-only" basis can call (608)
250-9281, and enter participant Code 132622, starting at 9:30 A.M.
Participants will be required to place their telephones on mute so as
not to prevent other parties from participating.  Those who plan on
listening to the meeting shall send an email to my attention at
"mhogan@cenhud.com" with the names of the individuals and organizations
participating.

Those who are not NYSRC ICAP WG Members or Alternate Members will be
given an opportunity to comment at the end of each meeting, or earlier
at the Chairman's invitation.

Should you have any questions, please contact me by email at
mhogan@cenhud.com or by phone at (845) 486-5213.

Michael P. Hogan
Secretary, NYSRC ICAP WG

(See attached file: NYSRC ICAP WG Agenda CC10.doc)
(See attached file: NYSRC ICAP WG Agenda CC10.doc)

 - NYSRC ICAP WG Agenda CC10.doc


Great to hear from you!  I'll forward this to the smart guys and see if they
have any interest.  Let me know which pipes you'll interconnect with and
we'll have a better sense of who else in the organization might be
interested.  Kent and Morgan, when we get Tony's response on the
interconnects, can you think it through from Florida's perspective also?
Thanks.  DF

"Tony Clark" <ajc@infohwy.com> on 10/05/2000 09:47:42 AM
To: <dfossum@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Salt storage project

Hello Mr. Fossum, I thought I would drop you a line  to say hello and let you
know we are still alive.? We are currently in the  process of securing the
land and minerals to build a high deliverability storage  project in Texas.
In several weeks we will be in a position to present the  project to you if
there is any interest. SGR?will build the facility for a  prospective buyer
and can arrange financing of the project to accommodate a  buyers needs.?
Preliminary project specs are as follows:
?

?Two 8 bcf caverns total working gas capacity  of 16 bcf facility.(Designed
to accommodate expansion while in  operation)
?Bi-directional access to 4 interstate  pipelines and 3 intrastate pipelines.
1.2 to 1.6 bcfpd?withdrawal and 400 to 600  mmcfpd of injection.
The facility will be designed to meet optimum  flexibility to meet commercial
dispatch requirements.
The facility can commence commercial operations by  fourth qtr 2002.
Preliminary costs estimates to build? $8  million per bcf of capacity. Recent
comps for storage facility sales  transactions have sold for?$17 to $26
million per bcf of  capacity.

?Let us know.
?
Take Care
T. Clark


REMINDER -


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Out for Dr's Appt

Date:		10/10/2000
Time:		2:30 PM - 5:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Mark, I just wanted to send you an e-mail to let you know that I have, over
the last six weeks, received an increasing number of requests for assistance
in drafting language for the long descriptions of new Canadian products our
commercial people want to trade on EOL.  These products have primarily been
financial products and have been with respect to both gas and power.  I
understand that the process is that Dianne Seib of our offices makes the
request to commence the approval process through Melba Lozano and that,
eventually, you are asked to approve the products on-line from a legal
perspective.  I wanted to check with you to make sure that you are okay with
me preparing the long descriptions for these various products and to find out
if you have any preference as to whether I forward the descriptions to you
when I send them to Dianne for her to start the process, just drop you an
e-mail letting you know about the new product and that I have been involved
and have signed off on the description or just leave it for you to look at
when you receive the request for legal approval from Melba and if you have
any concerns you can call me.  Whatever is easiest for you is fine with me,
just let me know how you would like to proceed.

By the way, I'm not sure if you were aware but Mark Powell from the Calgary
office is headed down to the Houston office for his secondment.  He arrives
in your offices on Monday, March 19 and will be there for five weeks.

Cheers
Greg


When: Friday, January 18, 2002 10:30 AM-11:00 AM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where: tbd

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*


Ken wants to have a meeting this afternoon in regard to California from a PR standpoint.  I have scheduled it at 3:00 p.m. in EB5001.  Ken understands that Steve may not be available to call in, so I've included Rick on the list.  Please let me know if you will be able to attend.

Rosie


Jason,

Could you resume discussions with Trading Edge rather than continuing to wait
for resolution of the consequential damage issue, which has been outstanding
for two months ?

Thanks.

Mike
713-853-9990


See attached.  Call in number via separate E-mail.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 11/21/2000 02:22 PM
---------------------------

Alan Comnes
11/21/2000 02:12 PM
To: Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: latest affidavit


Below please find a summary of recommendations from a meeting held Tuesday between Chip Schneider, Joe Deffner and Wes Colwell.  It is contemplated that these or similar recommendations will be implemented to control capital and other expenditures related to transaction development within the Americas:

Regional Managers within the Americas (East, West, Canada, Mexico, South America) shall be generally accountable for capital expenditures and other expenses associated with transaction development in their respective regions.
The Regional Manager shall designate one Transaction Leader (Director level or higher) for each individual transaction under consideration and shall be accountable to the Regional Manager.  The Transaction Leader or Regional Manager shall be the only parties authorized to obligate Enron or its affiliates under any contract or to transfer money.
Legal shall provide copies of all draft documents to Accounting, Global Finance and Underwriting.
The Deal Leader shall be responsible for drafting initial DASH, seeking buy-in from management and establishing a time-table for expenditure approval.
The initial draft of the DASH and economic model shall be provided to Underwriting at least ten business days prior to any movement of money (more time may be necessary if financing or ENE BoD approval is required).
Legal shall provide a final Legal Risk Memorandum to Underwriting prior to circulation of DASH.
Global Finance shall provide a final FASH to Underwriting prior to circulation of DASH.
Underwriting shall be responsible for DASH circulation.
Underwriting shall promptly provide Accounting with fully executed DASH to set approved budget limits.
Accounting shall keep records of all expenditures, maintain responsibility for approved budget compliance and sign-off on all contracts and money transfers prior to execution.

Let me know what further thoughts you have.

Regards,

Chip Schneider
713-853-1789
ECN2864


Is there anything that credit should be aware of.  Please let me know.

Ed Sacks

MARY COOK@ECT
10/18/2000 01:44 PM
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan
Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: MIECO - ISDA

Prior to sending anything we should check in with Richard Sanders.  Mary

Enron North America Corp.
Mary Cook
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com

	Tana Jones
	10/18/2000 12:47 PM

		 To: Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan
Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: MIECO - ISDA

Mark,

Mieco is the cpy where we had the misposted/bad online trade & we held up
their master.  Can we send it out?

	Edward Sacks@ENRON
	10/18/2000 12:41 PM

		 To: Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: MIECO - ISDA

It has been brought to my attention that the Mieco ISDA has not been received
by the company.  Could you let me know if there is any hold up or perhaps if
we need to trace the package?      Thanks

Ed Sacks
---------------------- Forwarded by Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron on 10/18/2000
12:34 PM ---------------------------

pdanna@mieco.com@mieco.com> on 10/18/2000 12:22:06 PM
Sent by: "Peter D'Anna" <pdanna@mieco.com>
To: <Edward.Sacks@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: ISDA

Ed,
I thought Mary and I finalized our issues a week or so ago, but I haven't
seen anything yet.  Maybe getting a signature?  Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: Edward.Sacks@enron.com [mailto:Edward.Sacks@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 5:36 AM
To: pdanna@mieco.com
Subject: ISDA

Peter,

Hope all is well.  Wanted to make sure that the ISDA has been received by
you.  My last recollection was that Mary Cook had agreed to all of your
requests.  Please respond when you get a chance.

Regards,

Ed Sacks


Per Mark's instructions - just a few minutes.


Dear Vince,

Thank you very much for your e-mail. I am very excited about the opportunity y
to see you soon in Dallas. Any week day, in general, and Fridays, in
particular,
is convenient for me. Please let me know what day might be convenient for you.

I look forward to hearing from you and to seeing you soon.

Sincerely,
Valery


This came in while I was in Austin last week, so I am just reading it today.
Any thoughts on this one?  --Sally
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 09/11/2000 03:53 PM
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources
	Canada Corp.

	From:  Cliff Lawrick                           09/07/2000 05:16 PM

To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Petro Canada

Eric Le Dain is renegotiating the Petro Canada contract and has a question
with regard to costs.  Canada is allocated a portion of your groups costs via
the service agreement and we are trying to determine what portion would be
applicable to PetroCanada.  Can you provide me with the name of an individual
in your group with whom I could discuss this allocation.  I'm going to have
to provide Eric with an answer by early next week.  Thanks for your
assistance.


NSM Bankruptcy Claim

Attached for your review and comment is a draft of the indemnification
portion of a claim by Enron entities in the NSM bankruptcy.? I have tried to
make the claim as big as possible, which makes it rather vague and
wishy-washy.? Maybe you can suggest changes.

At the risk of differing with Lisa and Paul, I really do not understand why
this is a good idea.? It seems to me that any claim by Enron is an unsecured
claim, way down in priority, clearly behind all of the bondholders, at least
to the extent of their security.? I don't understand how this claim creates
any threat to the plaintiffs or settlement pressure on anyone.

In addition, I hate saying the things we have to say to state a claim.? In
the litigation, we consistently say that we did nothing wrong, we were
victims too, the few people who did sue us should see their mistake and
dismiss us.? Now we propose to file a public document saying the opposite:?
that we fear the suits that have been filed and we expect more, producing
tens--maybe hundreds--of millions of dollars of exposure.

While we should continue to move this aspect of Enron's claim along, so we
are ready to file if we want to, I think we should consider a conference call
among Lisa, Paul, Richard, and me to talk through the wisdom of the
indemnification claim.? (I don't worry nearly so much about a fraud claim on
Enron's securities purchases, because that does not go against our litigation
position, although I still don't see what good such a claim would do.)

Steve Howard
Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP
showard@milbank.com
213-892-4478; 213-892-4748 (fax)

 <<NSM Claim.doc>>

This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee
or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify
the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer.

 - NSM Claim.doc


This member favorite is just a few weeks away, and there's still time for you
to register and be eligible for the private drawing for a Remington 1187!
Just send in your form and payment by August 1, and remember YOU MUST BE
PRESENT TO WIN!

 The Sporting Clays Committee and HEA want to thank this year's sponsors to
date and encourage other companies to participate if possible.  If you'd like
to join this elite list, contact Jim Cody (713/230-3550), T. Kemp Jones
(713/207-5189) or Jeff Eatherton (713/529-5247).

 DUKE FIELD SERVICES; CORAL ENERGY/TEJAS ENERGY; SANCHEZ OIL & GAS CORP; EL
PASO FIELD SERVICES; RELIANT ENERGY GAS TRANSMISSION; RELIANT ENERGY FIELD
SERVICES; MITCHELL GAS SERVICES; COASTAL FIELD SERVICES; AND RELIANT ENERGY
PIPELINE SERVICES.  The continued success of this tournament through the
enhanced quality of the prizes, dinner and services are made affordable only
through your contributions and we appreciate your support!

 Other door prizes this year include a Browning Citori and several other
guns! All prizes will be awarded during dinner in the air conditioned
pavilion.  The Two Man Flush will be shot from a newly covered deck, and
other areas on the courses have been covered as well.

 So visit the website, www.houstonenergy.org, and fill out a registration
form under "next event".  That's August 15 at the American Shooting Centers
(16500 Westheimer Parkway), and choose between 50 and 100 targets.  Even
non-shooters can come out, eat dinner, have some drinks and possibly win a
door prize and have lots of fun.  If you have other questions, contact Eva
Pollard at 713/651-0551.

 -----------------------------------------------------------
 This message was sent by:

 Teresa Knight, Executive Director
 Houston Energy Association (HEA)
 Phone: (713) 651-0551
 Fax: (713) 659-6424
 tknight@houstonenergy.org

 If you would like to have your email address removed from our mailing list,
please click the link below to the HEA Home page, where you will find a
mini-form to remove your name automatically.

 http://www.houstonenergy.org/


This guy has it right.
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 01/02/2001 12:17 PM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	01/02/2001 10:37 AM

		 To: mpalmer@enron.com, skean@enron.com, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Linda
Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia
Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Editorial by George Miller in SF Chronicle--"Another Utility
Bailout Should Leave Us Cold "

Another Utility Bailout Should Leave Us Cold
George Miller
Sunday, December 31, 2000
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle
URL:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2000/12/31/E
D134916.DTL
OUR CURRENT energy problems are urgent and serious. But before the governor
and the Public Utilities Commission cut yet another deal costing consumers
billions of dollars, perhaps they should pause to ask the public what kind of
system it wants and what it will end up with after investing billions more.
Failure of energy deregulation could speed real deregulation that might
benefit consumers with real capacity and real competition. But this will not
happen if the focus is only on California utilities and their shareholders.
The original deregulation deal was designed, as I see it, to keep competition
out of California -- and to maximize the rates consumers would pay for every
bad past business decision by PG&E and other California utilities.
Similarly, current bailout discussions are about forcing California
ratepayers to pay for the failed deregulation plan designed by the utilities
themselves. Once again, the companies seek to maximize profits and socialize
the losses.
Following on the heels of California's deregulation, the state's utilities
came to the congressional delegation and urged us to protect the plan from
federal deregulation efforts. They argued that the deal they cut was good for
all parties. Their executives repeated time and again that they might benefit
from the plan's cap on consumer prices -- and that there was a risk to them
if wholesale prices were to go up.
This, they told us, is the marketplace. They were willing to absorb the risk.
This was the brave new world of free markets.
But markets are never free. From the beginning, this deregulation plan was
designed to buy the California utilities time and advantage. Initially,
consumers saw lower rates, but not as low as real competition might have
provided when compared to the heavily sheltered market of the past five
years. Now, because this rigged marketplace has failed, the utilities want
again to put their hands into the ratepayers' pockets.
At first, PG&E and Southern California Edison asked the Public Utilities
Commission to have California consumers pay the entire cost of deregulation's
risks. Their idea did not pass the smell or the laugh test.
Now the utilities look for a way to repackage their old proposal, including a
substantial rate increase. The rationale is that the utilities may collapse
financially. This threat is supposed to inspire Gov. Gray Davis and the PUC
to quickly put the ratepayer on the hook for the utilities' failures.
During the past year, dozens of utilities have merged all across America.
PG&E, for example, may not be worth much to its shareholders, but like AT&T,
it may be worth something to its competitors. This is the genius of the
American marketplace.
PG&E shareholders bought the stock, assuming the risk. Why should the
ratepayers be asked to insulate them from that risk? During this past year,
tens of billions of dollars of market capitalization were lost by various
Silicon Valley high-tech firms. Their shareholders do not get the benefit of
going to the PUC and getting a taxpayer bailout.
The ratepayer has already paid for this energy under a contract that
utilities struck with the people of the state of California. Any additional
payment by the ratepayer is a financial bailout. Any prudent investor would
ask what the return will be before handing over billions of dollars. The
ratepayer deserves an answer, as well as some equity or other consideration.
George Miller is a Democratic congressman from Martinez.


Start Date: 1/24/02; HourAhead hour: 1;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002012401.txt


The Lions win !    The Lions win !

Break up the Lions....

Andy


Bill,

I shall be glad to meet you for dinner on Monday in Boston.

Vince

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	William Balson <wbalson@opt4.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-William+20Balson+20+3Cwbalson+40opt4+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Monday, June 04, 2001 12:53 PM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J
Subject:	RE: Boston

Opt4 is currently interviewing for two software engineering positions.  Our
needs currently center on Java and integrating Java with Oracle, WebLogic,
and XML.  Your son looks like he may have background in those specific
frameworks, but I couldn't be entirely sure. We have integration needs in a
few proprietary interfaces also, so a general capacity to learn new
interfaces quickly is a priority for us.  I'll get our job descriptions and
forward them to you.  Additionally, we do our risk analytics in Mathematica
(for the time being), but we have a full team.  If you son's work took him
into Mathematica as a framework for crypto, I would be interested in his
ability to interface Java and mathematica.  We find few people who know how
to do this right.  I also know one of the key storage system designers at
IBM in San Jose.  (He was a key inventor in IBM's CompactFlash micro hard
drive.)  Your son's prior work in storage systems may be relevant to him.

Can you meet for dinner Monday or Wednesday night in Boston?

-----Original Message-----
From: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com [mailto:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 10:33 AM
To: wbalson@opt4.com
Subject: RE: Boston

Bill,

Yes, I am coming to Boston.
Look forward to meeting you there.
My son has not made any decision yet.
I am enclosing his resume: please, let
me know what you think.

Vince

(See attached file: Vince.A.Kaminski.pdf)

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   William Balson <wbalson@opt4.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-William+20Balson+20+3Cwbalson+40opt4+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENR
ON.com]

   Sent:   Monday, June 04, 2001 12:18 PM
   To:     'vkamins@enron.com'
   Subject:  Boston

   Hi Vince -
   I wanted to check on a couple of items following our discussions earlier
   this year: 1) has your son decided where he will work? and 2) will you
   be in
   Boston for the Risk 2001 conference?
   Development is moving along at a good pace here at Opt4.
   Best regards,
   Bill Balson


---------------------- Forwarded by Don Miller/HOU/ECT on 05/17/2000 09:55 PM
---------------------------

"Stuart Zisman" <zisman@hotmail.com> on 05/17/2000 09:50:52 PM
To: Don.Miller@enron.com
cc: stuart.zisman@enron.com
Subject: Re:

Don,

Attached are three docs: (1) the revised PPA term sheet which I believe has
all of the changes, (2) the General Terms and (3) a redline of the General
Terms highlighting my questions/comments.  Generally Delainey was a genius
as expected but a few things really ought to be tightened down before the
doc is sent.

Zisman

>From: "Don Miller" <Don.Miller@enron.com>
>To: zisman@hotmail.com
>Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 20:07:20 -0500
>
>
>
>
>---------------------- Forwarded by Don Miller/HOU/ECT on 05/17/2000 08:07
>PM
>---------------------------
>
>From: Stuart Zisman on 05/17/2000 12:01 PM
>
>To:   Don Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT
>cc:
>Subject:
>
>Attached is the Revise PPA term sheet with your changes.
>
>Zisman
>
>(See attached file: E2 PPA Term Sheet v3.doc)
>
>
><< E2PPATermSheetv3.doc >>

________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com

 - GENCO General Terms V2 VS original.doc
 - GENCO General Terms V2.doc
 - E2 PPA Term Sheet v4.doc


THURSDAY OCT 25th

SEB FONTAINE

GLOBAL UNDERGROUND = PROTOTYPE- CD Release Tour

Seb Fontaine has rescheduled his appearance at HYPERIA. This October, 25th, the global domination of this heavily demanded DJ Stops in Houston at Hyperia! Seb has dance music in his blood from the day he was conceived in Ibiza - his mother is a semi-professional DJ. Growing up in West London, Seb?s initial musical development was stimulated by ska, but soon dropped out of sixth form college to pursue a career as a DJ. His first ?proper? gig was at Crazy Larry?s on the Kings Road, getting paid ?30 a night to spin tunes for a typical Eighties ?sloanie? crew. By 1989, Seb landed a residency at The Fridge, Brixton, where he played mainly hip hop and rare groove, swiftly followed a year later by a residency at The Wag, playing ragga, rare groove and acid. Next came a residency at Subterania, alongside Norman Jay and Jeremy Healy. In 1993, Seb gained his first house residency at Glitterati at The Cross. Malibu Stacey was the next stop for Seb - a night he put together and promoted at the Hanover Grand with friend Craig Richards. As Malibu got more established, Seb got increasingly restless, and took to the road in a big way, focusing more and more outside of London, becoming one of the UK?s hardest working ?motorway jocks?. At the same time, music becomes harder and deeper. In 1998, Seb was offerred a fortnightly residency at Cream, which soon became a weekly gig. In 1999, Seb took Ibiza by storm, with Cream at Amnesia. Seb Fontaine clinched the deal with Radio 1 in February 2000, initially to deputise for dance shows exclusively on Radio 1, gaining him the nickname ?super-sub?. He also joins Radio 1 in its mammoth summer of live music at the major dance festivals, and at the station?s own Radio 1 Dance Parties.

_______________________________________________________________________
Powered by List Builder
To unsubscribe follow the link:
http://lb.bcentral.com/ex/manage/subscriberprefs?customerid=6913&subid=67D71C0DBF29CD64&msgnum=65


#2 sounds like the CA Development structure to me.

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 04/04/2001 05:58:50 PM
To: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com>

Subject: New Proposal by Delta on HSR Fee Split

Kay:

I advised Greg Lang that Enron had approved our tentative proposal on
splitting the HSR fee, with Enron bearing a maximum of $25k.

Bill Blumenthal (our HSR expert) has now spoken with Dave Burns (Paul
Hastings' HSR expert), and Bill reports back that Mr. Burns now agrees that
there is exposure to an HSR filing requirement upon exercise of the
put/call.  Apparently, Mr. Burns had not previously focused on the transfer
of the remaining 20% interest in the LLC pursuant to the put/call in his
analysis.  They also agree that the filing fee will be determined by the
fair market value of the assets in the LLC at that time.

Greg Lang called after his report from his HSR expert and now proposes the
following alternatives:

1.  Straight-up 50/50 split of fees (with no $25k maximum on Enron's
contribution), so that the parties are equally incentivized to minimize the
fee; or

2.  Draft additional provisions whereby Enron consents in advance to some
structure such that upon exercise of the put/call, the value of the assets
owned by the LLC are as low as possible.  This may involve transferring one
or more of the turbines to another LLC wholly owned by the LLC.  (Greg
thinks that the value of the assets of wholly-owned subsidiaries need not be
included in the threshold calculation, but I have not confirmed this).  I
indicated that this could be viewed by the FTC as a subterfuge for avoiding
filing requirements.  He called back and subsequently advised that the
solution may then involve transferring each of the turbines to a separate
LLC owned 80/20 by PPL and ENA (to be in compliance with GE requirements)
and that Delta would have a business justification for doing this on the
basis of flexibility to put these turbines in various different projects.

Please advise of your thoughts on this issue.  Thank you.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
 <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com> ccampbell@kslaw.com

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.


----- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 03/26/2001 09:52 AM -----

	Gerald Nemec
	03/23/2001 04:56 PM

		 To: Stephanie Miller/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Kern Guaranty Forms

----- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 03/23/2001 04:55 PM -----

	Eric Gillaspie
	03/23/2001 04:40 PM

		 To: Stephanie Miller/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Kern Guaranty Forms

Stephanie,

Pursuant to Gerald Nemec's request I have attached the Guaranty Forms for
your further handling.

Thanks,

Eric Gillaspie
713-345-7667
Enron Building 3886


Sean - is this anything we need to follow up on?
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 02/28/2001 02:26 PM -----

	Sherri Sera
	02/28/2001 01:58 PM

		 To: Mark Frevert/NA/Enron, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Nicki Daw/NA/Enron, Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Nigeria Contract support

Mark and Steve, sorry to bother you with this, but I'm at a loss.  This guy
(Jim Cofield) called me on my cell phone last night about 7:00 p.m. to get my
e-mail address.  He asked that I take a look at his e-mail in the morning and
route it to the appropriate person within Enron.

The ".jpg" files below have no information in them, but the ".doc" file is a
14 page document with numerous correspondence from Mary Beth Cahill, former
director in the White House Office for Public Liaison, to Mr. Cofield
regarding a trip to Nigeria that he supposedly accompanied President Clinton
on several months ago; followed by a number of "proprietary information
documents" that mean absolutely nothing to me; followed by an overview of
Nigeria's electrical power situation; etc....The best I can tell, they are
trying to get Enron to bid on some project in Nigeria.

Since this e-mail is copied to the Vice President of the United States in
addition to several ambassadors, I thought it might need attention.  If you
can figure it out, please let me know how to proceed.  Thanks, SRS
---------------------- Forwarded by Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron on 02/28/2001
01:44 PM ---------------------------

"Jim Cofield" <jcofield@home.com> on 02/27/2001 07:06:11 PM
To: "Sherri Sera" <sherri.sera@enron.com>
cc: "Richard Cheney" <vice.president@whitehouse.gov>, "Ambassador Dele Cole"
<bedeos2000@yahoo.com>, "Ambassador Jibril Aminu" <bedeos2000@yahoo.com>,
"Ambassador Li Zhaoxing" <webmaster@china-embassy.org>

Subject: Nigeria Contract support

[IMAGE]

?

?

Jim E. Cofield

World Headquarters

Cofield Building

1016-22nd Street, Suite 200-500

Newport News, VA 23607-5316???????

Telephone? 757 223-0843

Fax: 757 223-0844

jcofield@home.com (email)

WebSite: http://cofield.my.treeway.com

"Making the World a Safer Place"

It is always an Honor to Serve and Support

?

?
 - image001.jpg
 - image002.jpg
 - image001.jpg
 - image002.jpg
 - Nigeria-Best8.doc


I have not received any at this point. But I will forward them on once I do.

Imelda

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	McLoughlin, Hector
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 1:53 PM
To:	Ormston, Kevin; Trevino, Imelda D.; Wachel, Jamie; Napoli, Judey; Fuqua, Linda; Vasut, Tony; De Jesus, Frank
Cc:	Cash, Michelle; Palmer, Lizzette
Subject:	FW: Revocation Waivers

All,
I'm forwarding a message from Michelle Cash and Lizette Palmer re: Revocation Waivers.     I have not received any signed notices back as of today but if you have please forward them to me.    I would like to forward them to the vault.
Thanks, H

 << Message: FW: Revocation Waivers >>


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Grigsby, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, May 31, 2001 10:21 AM
To:	Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:	FW: Texaco Penalties

Please forward to Suzanne as well.  Will you review this spreadsheet for April penalties associated with Texaco?  The volumes and prices did not look correct to me.  Let me know and I will have Anne change the value.

Thanks,
Mike

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bike, Anne
Sent:	Wednesday, May 16, 2001 12:25 PM
To:	Grigsby, Mike
Cc:	Giron, Darron C.; Sullivan, Patti
Subject:	Texaco Penalties

Mike:  Attached is a spreadsheet that summarizes the possible penalties we will be charging on the six PG&E Topock April Baseload load purchases that were severely cut throughout the month.  If we use the Gas Daily High Price plus $0.15, then the total penalties will be $2,032,902, but if we use the methodology described in the contract (Gas Daily), the total penalties will be $889,377.

I spoke to Phillip while you were out to see which method we should use. He said to wait until you returned.  I also verified with Darron that from a settlements perspective, we can send penalty invoices at any time.  Let's discuss when you return.  I have copies of all of the pertinent information.

Thanks

Anne


Per Kevin Garland's request, I've scheduled the following meeting.

DATE:  October 4, 2000
TIME:  3:30 - 4:30 pm
PLACE:  50M03

Thanks!

Rebekah Rushing (rebekah_rushing@enron.net)
Enron Broadband Services
Broadband Ventures group
713-853-3273 - phone
713-646-8010 - fax


Enron North America is offering free LEADERSHIP training classes on July 17th.

Moving from Conflict to Collaboration
8 a.m. to 12 p.m.
EB 560

Influencing for Win-Win Outcomes
1 p.m. to 5 p.m.
EB 560

Registration is on a first come, first serve basis.  Be sure to sign up soon
as spaces are limited.

For registration, please click here () to go directly into the Development
Center "Ernie, or call 3-0357.


James:  I just thought I'd follow up with you regarding our conversation of
June 7, 2000.  I thought that you were going to produce a new draft based
upon our discussion.  Please let me know if I misunderstood or if in fact the
ball is in my court.  Thanks.  Sara


Jesse told me to email you this.  It is the Cal ISO private web site
https://iso_si/iso/


Hello All;  Tom is flying to Alaska tomorrow Dec 15 and will be back
Xmas.
His telephone in Alaska is (907) 783-1291.  Also we have added a new phone
line here (630) 466-04420.  The other phone is operating (630) 466-4352.


At the request of Sara, I am attaching the ETA.  I am also sending the PA,
just in case...


Sounds Good!
Ben


What do I think about what...the fact that you're now the one that's a little
stressed?  I think that's kind of funny!!  Just kidding.  I have a friend
coming in town this weekend, but she's not coming until sometime Sat.
afternoon probably around 3-4ish.  So if you want to go to the driving range
around noonish on Sat. we could do that.  Although I think it's supposed to
rain all weekend so we might just end up back at the movies.

As for the rotation, I wouldn't exactly say I know Brian but I met him at the
Morton's dinner.   I guess I'd be as well off starting with him as to call
Ibrahim's friend, since I don't know Ibrahim or his friend.  Well actually, I
might know Ibrahim's friend.  Ask Ibrahim his friend's name and if I don't
know him I'll call Brian on Monday and see exactly what it is that they do.
Thanks for the help with this.

Talk to ya later,
Robin

Gabriel Monroy
11/03/2000 12:59 PM
To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: EBS

Well, We can go different routes. Do you know Brian Hoskins?  If not, I know
him well. Well, he works in that group. He can tell us what it is about. The
last time I talked to him, he did mention something about customers (big
customers); but honestly I am not sure exactly what it is. Then what we can
do is ask Ibrahim the name of his friend. We'll ask Brian if he knows him (
Brian, by the way, loves to help people. but only good people : (
 and we can go from there.

If not, we can just go trhough Ibrahim. Once that is done, We'll figure what
to tell Gossett (ouchhhh) . Uppsss, I do not want any oart during this stage.
He will probably kill me if he knows I told you about this group.

Ibrahim is leaving next week. He had told me that he was going to stay about
3 more weeks, but his new group wants him. Uppsss  I feel I have SOOOOO Much
to learn. I really feel behind. There will be a lot of reading this weekend
but of course I might take a break and go to the drive range if you want to
go. You never responded me. Ok, ok, maybe you do not want to go. I'll go on
my own and hit the ball with my tennis raquet.

Anyways. who said there was no stress level here. I am getting kind of
nervous because it is a little complicated.  Tell me what you think.

Gabriel


Steve, see note below.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bachand, Terri
Sent:	Tuesday, February 26, 2002 5:46 PM
To:	Robertson, Audrey
Subject:	RE: TW Model Assumptions

I heard Kevin talking to Tracey and she asked could they just circle back with him next week.  Kevin said yes that he could be brought up to speed later, so I guess he doesn't have to call in afterall.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Robertson, Audrey
Sent:	Tuesday, February 26, 2002 4:11 PM
To:	Bachand, Terri
Cc:	Robertson, Audrey; Donoho, Lindy
Subject:	TW Model Assumptions

Terri, Steve will probably dial into this meeting on tomorrow.  Are there any documents I need to fax to Steve?

adr

Audrey D. Robertson
Transwestern Pipeline Company
email address:  audrey.robertson@enron.com
(713) 853-5849
(713) 646-2551 Fax


Both of these were trader errors and have been changed.

Thanks,
kate

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
11/22/2000 11:41 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: natsource checkout

465810
matt
strike price 70.00
8.00 premium

465556
bob
broker has mid c


STEAKS?  We got em--stay at our joint and eat big meat 3 times daily.  I've
got the grill set up so I can flip steaks while sitting in the hot tub
drinking beer--its sort of like that Yahoo TV commercial where the sad eskimo
family radically changes their lifestyle by ordering the grill and hot tub
off the web.  DF

Paul Gertsen <paulg@stpaul.lib.mn.us> on 02/16/2000 02:35:33 PM
To: Drew.Fossum@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Re: Huron

On Wed, 16 Feb 2000 Drew.Fossum@enron.com wrote:

>
> Christmas pics?  Didn't you get the Christmas card with pics?

Hell no!

>  We shouldn't have outsourced the mail room function--quality control
> has gone to hell. Come to Omaha and hang out for a couple of days and
> I'll give you some pics in person!  DF

If I come to Omaha, I'll need more 'an pics. I'll need a big steak. Find
me a place where they got them.

pkg


Please print and add to my Fuel Cell book.  Thanks.  Kay

ps please print a second copy for John however you spell Clawburg.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/19/2000 03:18
PM ---------------------------

Claudette Harvey@ECT
10/19/2000 01:59 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Stephen Plauche/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Scott Healy/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: CRRA Tax Structure Overview

Per your request.  Call me if you need anything else.

-claude


Ken:

This idea might be more appropriate for the Management Conference rather than tomorrow, but I suggest a fifth value or at least implicit emphasis of a value within our values--humility.

There are different dictionary definitions of the term, but the one that fits Enron best is "not proud or haughty; not arrogant or assertive."  We want to be proud but not haughty, arrogant, or assertive, so there is a fine line with the term.

"Humility" is really a necessary characteristic of any firm participating in the "creative destruction" of open markets.  It reflects the fact that 1) the market and exogenous events are orders of magnitude greater than any one company, individual, or institution, and 2) a company's performance, no matter how positive, is just a temporary, even fleeting, evaluation of consumers, investors, employees, and the general public.  After all, everyone has choices.

The humility value has been one of the most important for Charles Koch of Koch Industries.  Koch has certainly had their share of problems and has a very different business model from Enron.  But what is important is that Charles is a very serious student of market-based ideas and sees this value coming straight from Joseph Schumpeter, F. A. Hayek, and others in the free market vanguard.  I wholly agree.

- Rob


----- Original Message -----
From: Clifford S.  Ang
To: Eric Saibi
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 4:00 AM
Subject: RE: Hi!
That stuff on e-bay was cool.  At least you made  use of some of your Enron stuff.  It's great to hear that you're working  for UBS Warburg.  Which group are you with now?

I think my dad is planning a trip to the Chicago Food  Show sometime in May.  I'm not sure on how that will go, but I may join him  then.  I also need to drop by Saint Louis to renew my driver's  license.  Besides, I haven't been back since graduation.  Adnan told  me that you just bought a place.  It would be great to visit you and Texas  for the first time.  I may stay longer with you guys (I also have a friend  living in Austin) before I finally come back home.

My parents and I are going to China in March, and I was  surprised that they're asking my girlfriend to go along with us.  The Wash  U International Advisory Council Meeting will be held in China in March and I  will just catch them for their last leg.

Business in the Philippines is really bad, and it's not  going anywhere in the near future.  I had this deal with Adnan last  December to January.  He wanted me to sell used hard disks to prospective  buyers in the Philippines.  I found one group and it took a long time to  get the goods here and out of customs.  Finally, during the first week of  January, the goods were released and shit turned worse.  The buyer claimed  that we shipped him 95% defective items.  Out of the 400+ hard drives,  around 200 had bad sectors (which were deemed to be good drives by most people),  21 were good, and the balance were either not detected or had this knocking  sound.  Anyway, I think Adnan was willing to give him some sort of refund  on the balance, but the guy kept on insisting for Adnan not to negotiate the  letter of credit.  The whole thing was so fucked up, and the guy was  implying that he was going to sue me for intentionally scamming him off  US$6,800.  I couldn't believe that he would think that I would destroy my  credibility for such a small amount of money.  Anyway, the problem seems to  be hanging out there, but the buyer had some fishy stuff going.  He called  me to go to his place and, when I arrived, they have finished testing all the  drives.  I mean, they should have waited for me to get there before testing  at least half of the drives for their own protection.  Now, we could not  tell whether the drives that were displayed (and they were displayed in an  extremely organized manner) were actually ours or not.  Second, his  unwillingness to take a refund instead of stopping the LC negotiation is  somewhat irregular.  We were thinking that maybe he doesn't have enough  funds in the bank or something to cover his line.  Third, he wanted to send  back all goods and charge it to us.  That way, if he indeed changed our  good drives with defective ones, he would have gotten 400 good drives and gotten  rid of his bad ones free of charge.  Adnan shipped 200 drives from the same  lot to his dad in Pakistan, and they came out around 12% defective.  Even  at that level, 50% seems to be too far away.  So, there, since we haven't  negotiated the letter of credit yet (it should be done within this week), I  haven't heard from the buyer.  I would not be surprised if I receive some  subpoena or something from the bastard after we negotiate the LC.  Anyway,  I asked my lawyer, and he said that there is really not much of a case on his  side.  Besides, all documents were made by Adnan and him.  He cannot  sue Adnan, so his only choice is to sue me ... if that's what he wants.   Well, let's see how it goes.

I got a bunch of financial consultancy work on the  side.  I arrange financing for some people with our bank contacts.   It's very tedious and time consuming to complete a deal.  Sometimes, the  odds of getting a good deal are very slim that I can't really depend on these  things for regular income.  I can't spend that much anymore.  I'm  saving up for my future.  I may actually get married in a year or  two.  I don't know yet, but this relationship is getting pretty serious and  I think that she's the one.  She's studying medicine and will be graduating  this April.  She'll have another year of internship before taking the  boards next year.  She wants to go to the US for her residency, but we'll  see how things go.  Any good medical schools/hospitals there in  Houston?

Well, I gotta go now.  Just write when you have  time.

Cliff


-----Original Message-----
From: 	VIKKI ANAYA <vanaya_vitoltvl@yahoo.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 10:31 AM
To:	Sanders, Richard B.
Cc:	Sweet, Twanda
Subject:

                                          AGENT JH/VA BOOKING REF
YVVYL7

                                          SANDERS/RICHARD B

  ENRON
  1400 SMITH
  HOUSTON TX 77002
  TWANDA SWEET X39402

  DATE:  OCT 24 2001

SERVICE               DATE  FROM           TO             DEPART
ARRIVE

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES  29OCT HOUSTON TX     WASHINGTON DC  120P    512P
CO 232     A          MON   G.BUSH INTERCO R REAGAN NAT
                            TERMINAL C     TERMINAL B
                                                          NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         2:52 DURATION
                  AIRCRAFT: BOEING 737-500

HOTEL                 29OCT MARRIOTT JW HOTEL
                      31OCT 1331 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE
                            WASHINGTON, DC 20004
                            UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                            TELEPHONE: 1-202 3932000
                            FAX: 1-202 6266991
                            CONFIRMATION: 80473590
                            REFERENCE: CORA00
                            SINGLE ROOM
                            RATE: COR USD 199.00 PER NIGHT
                            GUARANTEE GIVEN

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES  31OCT WASHINGTON DC  HOUSTON TX     740A    955A
CO 227     A          WED   R REAGAN NAT   G.BUSH INTERCO
                            TERMINAL B     TERMINAL C
                                                          NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         3:15 DURATION
                  AIRCRAFT: BOEING 737-500

RESERVATION NUMBER(S)  CO/VNC9GD

CO  FREQUENT FLYER COTP028685
*CONTINENTAL RECORD LOCATOR: VNC9GD
***********************************************
THIS IS A TICKETLESS RESERVATION. PLEASE HAVE A
PICTURE ID AVAILABLE AT THE AIRPORT. THANK YOU
CONTINENTAL 005-7035412661/ETCO/USD1860.00/22OCT01
                  THANK YOU FOR CALLING VITOL TRAVEL

=====
VITOL TRAVEL
713 FARGO AVENUE
HOUSTON TX 77006
713-526-0633-NEW NUMBER
1 800-724-7002

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
http://personals.yahoo.com


--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MTAYLO1>
To: Keiser, Holly </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Hkeiser>
Date: Friday, October 26, 2001 7:02:36 GMT
Subject:


Your mailbox has exceeded one or more size limits set by your administrator.
Your mailbox size is 120879 KB.
Mailbox size limits:
	You will receive a warning when your mailbox reaches 115000 KB.You may not be able to send or receive new mail until you reduce your mailbox size.
To make more space available, delete any items that you are no longer using or move them to your personal folder file (.pst).
Items in all of your mailbox folders including the Deleted Items and Sent Items folders count against your size limit.
You must empty the Deleted Items folder after deleting items or the space will not be freed.
See client Help for more information.


Email copy for your records...

-----Original Message-----
From: Julie Hunt [mailto:jhunt_vitoltvl@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:59 AM
To: DuBose, Heidi
Subject: Lucci 8oct Denver to Houston---ETKT

                                          AGENT JH/JH BOOKING REF
Y5THCI

                                          LUCCI/PAUL

  ENRON
  1200 17TH STREET
  SUITE 2750
  DENVER CO 80202
  ATTN: HEIDI DUBOSE

  DATE:  SEP 25 2001                   ENRONDEN

SERVICE               DATE  FROM           TO             DEPART
ARRIVE

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES  08OCT DENVER CO      HOUSTON TX     435P    755P
CO 1098    B          MON   DENVER INTL    G.BUSH INTERCO
                                           TERMINAL C
                            SNACK                         NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         2:20 DURATION
                  AIRCRAFT: MCDONNELL DOUGLAS MD-80 ALL SERIES
                            SEAT 11C NO SMOKING CONFIRMED LUCCI/PAUL

HOTEL                 08OCT DOUBLETREE HOTEL HOUSTON-ALLEN CENTER
                      10OCT 400 DALLAS STREET
                            HOUSTON, TX 77002
                            UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                            TELEPHONE: 713 759-0202
                            FAX: 713 759-1166
                            TELEX: TLX NONE
                            CONFIRMATION: 84326737
                            REFERENCE: D1KENR
                            SINGLE ROOM KING SIZE BED
                            RATE: ENR USD 159.00 PER NIGHT
                            GUARANTEE GIVEN
                            ZD460499798
           **24 HOUR CANCEL POLICY AT THE DOUBLETREE ALLEN CTR

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES  10OCT HOUSTON TX     DENVER CO      841P    1006P
CO 249     V          WED   G.BUSH INTERCO DENVER INTL
                            TERMINAL C
                                                          NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         2:25 DURATION
                  AIRCRAFT: BOEING 737-900
                            SEAT 09C NO SMOKING CONFIRMED LUCCI/PAUL

      AIR FARE 300.46       TAX 32.54           TOTAL USD
333.00
                                            AIR TOTAL USD
333.00

                                        INVOICE TOTAL USD
333.00

PAYMENT: CCVI4673051964310016/0202/A025998

RESERVATION NUMBER(S)  CO/UDS9Q4

LUCCI/PAUL                               TICKET:CO/ETKT 005 7034200919

CO  FREQUENT FLYER COSU783177
**CONTINENTAL RECORD LOCATOR: UDS9Q4
THIS IS A TICKETLESS RESERVATION. PLEASE HAVE A
PICTURE ID AVAILABLE AT THE AIRPORT. THANK YOU
***********************************************
NON-REFUNDABLE TKT MINIMUM $100.00 CHANGE FEE
                  THANK YOU FOR CALLING VITOL TRAVEL

=====
Vitol Travel Services
713 Fargo
Houston, Tx 77006
(800) 724-7002
(713) 526-0633

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com


Hey, I missed your wonderful response on Monday.  Tim filled me in.  I was
on a plane to Notre Dame on Monday when I heard the wonderful news of my
termination.  Oh well, life's a bitch!

No bets for the LSU game, but I feel that LSU should give the Vols. a run
for their money.

Texas finally wised up and gave Major the start...Mack must need to win this
bowl game?

Oh well, have fun at work.  I have to go back to sleep.


NOTE:  YOU WILL RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE EACH TIME YOU ARE SELECTED AS A REVIEWER.

You have been selected to participate in the Year End 2000 Performance
Management process by providing meaningful feedback on specific employee(s).
Your feedback plays an important role in the process, and your participation
is critical to the success of Enron's Performance Management goals.

To complete requests for feedback, access PEP at http://pep.corp.enron.com
and select Perform Review under Performance Review Services.  You may begin
providing feedback immediately and are requested to have all feedback forms
completed by Friday, November 17, 2000.

If you have any questions regarding PEP or your responsibility in the
process, please contact the PEP Help Desk at:

Houston: 1.713.853.4777, Option 4
London:  44.207.783.4040, Option 4
Email: perfmgmt@enron.com

Thank you for your participation in this important process.

The following is a CUMULATIVE list of employee feedback requests with a
status of "OPEN."   Once you have submitted or declined an employee's request
for feedback, their name will no longer appear on this list.

Review Group: ENRON
Feedback Due Date: Nov 17, 2000

Employee Name                   Supervisor Name                 Date Selected
-------------                   ---------------                 -------------
BROWN, WILLIAM W                LOUISE KITCHEN                  Nov 02, 2000
BRUCE, DANIEL                   PHILIPPE A BIBI                 Nov 10, 2000
DETMERING, TIMOTHY J            JEFFREY M DONAHUE JR            Oct 31, 2000
DOSHIER, RAYMOND W              KEVIN P HANNON                  Nov 13, 2000
FITZGERALD, JAY L               LOUISE KITCHEN                  Nov 13, 2000
GARNER, BRUCE                   LOUISE KITCHEN                  Oct 27, 2000
GROS, THOMAS D                  LOUISE KITCHEN                  Nov 13, 2000
MCMAHON, JEFFREY                MARK A FREVERT                  Oct 31, 2000
PIPER, GREGORY F                GREGORY F PIPER                 Nov 14, 2000
ZIPPER, ANDREW A                LOUISE KITCHEN                  Nov 13, 2000


[IMAGE]
 Mirant has added a News Release to its Investor Relations web site.  For a complete listing of our News Releases visit:  http://ir.ccbn.com/ir.zhtml?t=MIR&s=405&item_id='5'  Title:  Mirant Names William Orr CCO of Asia SubsidiaryDate: 1/25/2002This email alert service uses proprietary JoinMail list management software provided by CCBN.To learn more about JoinMail, visit the CCBN Website @: www.ccbn.com

To unsubscribe from this JoinMail list, please click on the link below and send a blank reply:   U-B2.7045.105390.paulzQ4dzQ4thomaszQ2enronzQ4com@joinmail.ccbn.com


here is your test.  don't lie.

To: "Aaron Hurlbert (E-mail)" <Hurl007@aol.com>, "Alex Schott (E-mail)"
<aschott1976@cs.com>, "Bert Turner (E-mail)" <bturner@ssoe.com>, "Brandon
Cambre (E-mail)" <bcambr@lsumc.edu>, "Celeste Turner (E-mail)"
<CMCMTURNER@aol.com>, "Chad. Landry (E-mail)" <chad.landry@enron.com>,
"Dannylsu (E-mail)" <dannylsu@hotmail.com>, "Elizabeth Uddo (E-mail)"
<Haci226@aol.com>, "Helen Turner (E-mail)" <helengturner@aol.com>, "Joaquin
Targhetta (E-mail)" <joaquin.targhetta@es.arthurandersen.com>, "Jpelti
(E-mail)" <jpelti@lsumc.edu>, "Kellie Matherne (E-mail)"
<kelliemath@aol.com>, "kelly landry (E-mail)" <klandry@wallace.com>, "Kevin
Stolzenthaler (E-mail)" <kstolze@yahoo.com>, "Matthew. Lenhart (E-mail)"
<matthew.lenhart@enron.com>, "Maziarz (E-mail)" <maziarz@bellsouth.net>,
"Mike Plauche (E-mail)" <llabn@aol.com>, "Shawn Darrah (E-mail)"
<sdarrah@entergy.com>, "Nick Danna (E-mail)" <Nicholas.Danna@ey.com>, "Tim
Dietz (E-mail)" <TDietz@allstate.com>, "Timothy_Blanchard (E-mail)"
<timothy_blanchard@enron.com>, "Tyler Trahant (E-mail)"
<ttrahant@rdminker.com>, "Val Generes (E-mail)" <val.generes@ac.com>, "'Zoe
Cerbauskas'" <zcerbauskas@morganmckinley.com>
cc:

Subject: FW: Check your status out !

Who ever has the highest score is the coolest -- YA!!!!!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Agostini, Marco
> Sent: 05 June 2000 10:28
> To: Turner, Bret
> Subject: FW: Check your status out !
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Deacon, Sean
> Sent: 05 June 2000 08:12
> To: Agostini, Marco; Peacock, George; Haroutunian, Paul; Threadgold,
> Keith; James, Ben; Dark, David; Byrne, Tim; Jeacock, Matthew; McCrudden,
> Jamie
> Subject: Check your status out !
>
>
>
>
>  <<Corruptt.exe>>
>
> Dan Amor
> CREDIT  | FIRST
> SUISSE  | BOSTON
> EMERGING  MARKETS
> *  +171 888
> Fax  +171 888 3860
> * :  MailTo:daniel.amor@csfb.com
>
>

This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information.  No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the
sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve
the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.  Any
views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except
where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state
them to be the views of any such entity.
Unless otherwise stated, any pricing information given in this message is
indicative only, is subject to change and does not constitute an offer to
deal at any price quoted.
Any reference to the terms of executed transactions should be treated as
preliminary only and subject to our formal written confirmation.

 - Corruptt.exe


Apologies, but I'm trying to make sure that I have the meeting times right.

Monday 10:30 AM CDT--"All hands" meeting with business folks.
Monday 3 PM CDT--Washington Call
Tuesday/Thursday 1:30 PM CDT--California Call
Thursday 4 PM CDT--Leadership call

Do I have these right?

Thanks a million.

Best,
Jeff