---------------------- Forwarded by Darlene C Forsyth/HOU/ECT on 11/29/2000
02:10 PM ---------------------------
To: Darlene C Forsyth/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maricela Chavez/HOU/EES@EES, Elizabeth
Dean/HOU/EES@EES, Todd5@duplinnet.com
cc:
Subject: Sand Pictures!!!

---------------------- Forwarded by Debbie Lucadou/HOU/EES on 11/29/2000
01:51 PM ---------------------------
From: Irma Fuentes@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS on 11/29/2000 01:47 PM
To: Debbie Lucadou/HOU/EES@EES, Rose
Rivera/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Frances
Garcia/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: Sand Pictures!!!

----- Forwarded by Irma Fuentes/Enron Communications on 11/29/00 01:47 PM
-----

	RichardF@publicans.com
	11/29/00 01:30 PM

		 To: jdavidlopez@ev1.net, Irma Fuentes/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, JackieH@publicans.com, JudithG@publicans.com,
angelac@publicans.com, marisal@wetmore-printing.com,
melissafuentes1@juno.com, scopyskit1@aol.com, Monica.Diaz@publicans.com,
Neo_69_00@hotmail.com, dncortiz@hotmail.com, rosies@publicans.com,
Sgallegos@boysandgirlsharbor.org, Stephanie.Bazaldua@publicans.com,
SFierro@publicans.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Sand Pictures!!!

>    <<JESUS 2.jpg>>  <<JESUS.jpg>>  <<Last Supper.jpg>>


FYI.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/20/2000 08:57
AM ---------------------------

Fred Mitro@ECT
12/19/2000 06:34 PM
To: Randy Petersen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lisa
Bills/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Intergen/Coral transaction

Randy:

As I indicated in my voicemail, Coral has requested that Intergen (or its
designated project affiliate - Sweetgum Energy L.P.) be the counterparty that
transacts with Enron.  Based on current information, the structure of the
transaction has not materially changed from the Coral deal structure
described in the 11/30/00 DASH.  Intergen is holding a Board meeting this
afternoon and the proposed transaction is on the agenda for approval.

With regard to the timing of the funding, it is my understanding that once
the Letter Agreement has been executed (target date: 12/21) and associated
documents accepted by Intergen, Enron will notify TurboPark of its intention
to assign the equipment to Intergen (target notice date: 12/22).  Once the
assignment documents are ready for execution, Intergen will fund the
transaction and Enron will execute the assignment documents immediately after
receiving written confirmation that Enron has received the transaction
proceeds.  There is a desire by East Origination to, if possible, book the
earnings from this transaction in fiscal year 2000.

Rebecca Walker (ENA development) is planning to run a D&B report on Sweetgum
Energy L.P.  tomorrow once she receives the State and Headquarters
information necessary.  I traded voicemails with Ben Glisan today on this
counterparty change.  He asked that I work with RAC deal personell on this
matter.

Based upon your voicemail it appears that we do not need to amend the DASH
based upon this change in counterparty.  Let me know if any of the above
information changes your opinion.

Call me if you wish to discuss this information.

Thanks,
Fred Mitro
x35406


Sure!

	Lora Sullivan@ENRON
	12/13/2000 09:19 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Amy Fabian/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Meeting with Linda Robertson and Chris Long

Tana,

Rick Shapiro has just scheduled a conference call at 10:30 AM Friday,
12/15/00.
Could Linda Roberston and Chris Long arrive 15 minutes later for your meeting
on Friday?
Hope this works.  Thanks!

Lora Sullivan
Federal Government Affairs Representative
Enron
1775 Eye Street, NW
Suite 800
Washington, DC  20006
202-466-9142
202-828-3372 (fax)
email:  lsulliv@enron.com

10:45 AM.-12:30 PM Meeting w/ Tana Jones
     EB 3802
Arranged by Taffy @ 713-345-7373


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/24/2001
09:55 AM ---------------------------

VKaminski@aol.com on 01/23/2001 08:34:09 PM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Fwd: Newest Enron Presentation

Return-Path: <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
Received: from  rly-zc02.mx.aol.com (rly-zc02.mail.aol.com [172.31.33.2]) by
air-zc03.mail.aol.com (v77.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 11:42:54 -0500
Received: from  postmaster.enron.com (outbound5.enron.com [192.152.140.9]) by
rly-zc02.mx.aol.com (v77.27) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 11:32:11 -0500
Received: from nahou-msmsw02px.corp.enron.com ([172.28.10.38]) by
postmaster.enron.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/postmaster-1.00) with ESMTP id QAB22754 for
<vkaminski@aol.com>; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 16:32:05 GMT
From: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
Received: from ene-mta01.enron.com (unverified) by
nahou-msmsw02px.corp.enron.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with ESMTP
id <Tac1c0a2651479e9329@nahou-msmsw02px.corp.enron.com> for
<vkaminski@aol.com>; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 10:32:05 -0600
Subject: Newest Enron Presentation
To: vkaminski@aol.com
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 10:30:08 -0600
Message-ID: <OF1330994B.B955DC9E-ON862569DD.0057C3EF@enron.com>
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on ENE-MTA01/Enron(Release 5.0.6 |December
14, 2000) at 01/23/2001 10:30:24 AM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/mixed;
Boundary="0__=862569DD0057C3EF8f9e8a93df938690918c862569DD0057C3EF"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version)

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/23/2001
10:01 AM ---------------------------

 (Embedded     Enron North America Corp.
 image moved
 to file:      From:  Edward Anderson @ ENRON
 pic03039.pcx) 01/23/2001 09:13 AM

To:   Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:  Newest Enron Presentation

Vince,
Here is the newest Enron Presentation.  Please take a look at the new one
and make any changes you want.  Please e-mail me the final version and I
will save it to my laptop and we can run it from my laptop at the
presentation.  I will also be forwarding the logistics for Cal Berkeley.
Regards,
Ed

(See attached file: Presentation Spring '01.ppt)

 - pic03039.pcx
 - Presentation Spring '01.ppt


Please arrange this
----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 10/23/2000 02:12 PM -----

	Eric Thode@ENRON
	10/19/2000 05:05 PM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eileen Kisluk/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Meeting Regarding Gleason

I know we have discussed a possible meeting regarding the problems at Gleason
on Monday, October 23.  I will be out of the office on Monday and Tuesday
with the Florida project development group.  Can we shoot for Wednesday,
Thursday or Friday instead?

Eric


Jeff, this morning I spoke with Reliant's regulatory counsel, who called me
after talking with Lee Hart, and who seemed eager to look into drafting a
filing.  I would be happy to talk with Leonard Foster or June Suwara at
Sempra about doing the same, but somehow think Sempra might be a tougher
customer (don't know why I would think that...).  My suggestion is that we
work through Ms. Katz initially.  Anticipating that we might encounter some
inertia at Sempra's regulatory dept. -- and to give you an outline to work
from when talking to Stefanie -- I put together the attached rough draft of a
motion to intervene and motion to expedite to be filed by Sempra.

Feel free to send the attached to Stefanie.  However, please do so with the
caveat that you are sending it for discussion purposes only, not as legal
advice to Sempra from ET&S's legal department, and the content of this
pleading should ultimately be up to Sempra's legal/regulatory staff.

Reliant's counsel said he'd be sending me a draft of his pleading...if I
don't hear from him within a reasonable time I'll call to follow up.


Please double check the Capacity number when you use Mark Bernstein's model.
Matthew Gimble and I found out that when you click ISO, the model actually
spits out 95 degrees MW, and vice versa.

Please call me if you have questions.


Here is the file.  We used Victor's transport model that he uses for all of
the other transport deals.  The omicron volatility curve that we used was 11
- the same as other Chigate deals.  Give me a shout with any questions.
PL

---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 07/10/2000
10:54 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Victor Guggenheim                           07/10/2000 10:58 AM

To: Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:


The report named: NG - PROPT P/L <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=11&report_name=NG+-+PROPT+P/L&category_cd=5&category_name=FINANCIAL&toc_hide=1&sTV1=5&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=10/25/2001>, published as of 10/25/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


Jim Derrick

-----Original Message-----
From: Newell, Eric <Eric.Newell@ENRON.com>
To: Harris, Stephanie J  <Stephanie.Harris@ENRON.com>
CC: Derrick Jr., James <James.Derrick@ENRON.com>
Sent: Wed Nov 14 15:30:36 2001
Subject: Re: MESSAGE FROM JIM DERRICK

The law firm of Baker & McKenzie is currently assisting Christopher Wood out of Enron Europe on the wind company's behalf in connection with the formation of a joint venture to provide wind turbine maintenance services on several wind turbines that we are proposing to place in service in Japan.  The legal services are being provided out of Baker & McKenzie's Tokyo office.  The attorney contact is Paul Davis.  Please let me know if you need any further information.


In case you are not on your work email.

----- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 03/13/2001 02:07 PM -----

	Gerald Nemec
	03/13/2001 02:07 PM

		 To: "Waldrop, Barbara (CBI-Houston)" <Barbara.Waldrop@cox.com>@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: FW: "Come on feel the noise..."

You are so cool.  I can't believe that the person in that picture with the
biggest rock band of all time, was in my bed last night.  Wow!  Everyday I
found something out that just makes me want you more and more!  Ha Ha Ha

How is Ms. Barbara doing today?  I am weary from the pile of other people's
projects couched on top of my head but "I will survive, Hey Hey".  I've lost
the edge Maverick,  I am holding on too tight!


Member Services
Notice No. MS-24
April 23, 2001

COMMODITY EXCHANGE, INC.

 NOTICE OF INTENTION TO TRANSFER MEMBERSHIP

Notice of Intention to Transfer Membership has been posted on the bulletin
board of the Exchange by:

Joseph Augello (ELLO-7102)

In connection therewith, notification of any claims against the
aforementioned individual arising out of transactions executed on the
Exchange up to the close of business on April 23, 2001, must be submitted to
the Corporate Secretary's Office within ten (10) days.

Inquiries regarding the above should be directed to the Member Services
Department at (212) 299-2370.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=tana.jones@enron.com&refdo
c=(MS-24)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/10/2001 01:55
PM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
01/10/2001 01:51 PM
To: stephen.swift@ps.ge.com, mike.barnas@ps.ge.com
cc:

Subject: RE: invoice information/TurboPark

Viola!
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/10/2001 01:50
PM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
01/03/2001 11:18 AM
To: lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com
cc:

Subject: RE: invoice information/TurboPark

Lee,

The best way to go about it would be to send the invoice to Jody, but copy
the Enron project folks you have been dealing with.

Are we ready to sign the Fountain Valley contract?  I would think that we
could sign the change order at the same time, and payment terms can be
whatever the Enron project team has bought in to.  The banks won't care.

Have you seen sig pages for ESA yet?

Kay

lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com on 01/03/2001 09:00:30 AM
To: Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc:

Subject: RE: invoice information/TurboPark

Kay,

Please confirm that this will be the invoicing address for the 6 units bound
for Fountain Valley Project and 4 units pegged to LV Cogen Expansion.  Also,
we've still got a change order needed for Fountain Valley for the 6 Power
System Stabilizers and 2 Exhaust Stacks.  LV is also saying they will need 4
Power System Stabilizers, but haven't confirmed their order.

Thanks,

Lee

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 6:06 PM
To: lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com
Subject: invoice information/TurboPark

E-Next Generation LLC
Mr. Jody Pierce
1400 Smith, EB 2480
Houston, Tx 77002


The company is "ECT Merchant Investments Corp."

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shackleton, Sara
Sent:	24 October 2001 19:58
To:	Shah, Rajen; Doukas, Tom
Cc:	Heard, Marie
Subject:	RE: Investment companies

Tom:  Please forward your requisite email request to Donna Lowry, Rick Carson and Bill Bradford with your request and reasons.

This will entail new account application, board resolution and authorized trader list.

By the way, the Enron Corp. corporate database does not list a company with the name "Enron Capital Trade Merchant Investments."

Thanks.  Sara

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shah, Rajen
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 1:08 PM
To:	Hemsley, Simon; Doukas, Tom; Shackleton, Sara
Cc:	Drew, Rachel; Jordan, Kevin D; Wall, David
Subject:	RE: Investment companies

OK for tax.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hemsley, Simon
Sent:	24 October 2001 18:40
To:	Doukas, Tom; Shackleton, Sara
Cc:	Drew, Rachel; Shah, Rajen; Jordan, Kevin D; Wall, David
Subject:	RE: Investment companies

Tom - I will try and get a USD accounting entity set up in SAP that rolls up to
ECTEF Inc for legal purposes

I'm fairly sure we can do this as 54R (ECTRL Global Divisions) is a $ accounting entity of
138 (ECTRL), a ? entity

Raj - do you have a problem from a tax perspective of having this set up?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Doukas, Tom
Sent:	24 October 2001 18:31
To:	Hemsley, Simon; Shackleton, Sara
Cc:	Drew, Rachel; Shah, Rajen; Jordan, Kevin D; Wall, David
Subject:	RE: Investment companies
Importance:	High

It will mean doing the paperwork all over again and closing the old account assuming ECTEF does not want an account.  This is not a name change but actually a transfer from one entity to another.  It will likely require resolutions to open brokerage accounts for ECTMI if they don't already have them in place.

Aside from looking foolish to Bear I anticipate no hassles from them.  As far as our side it would be wise to have legal give their estimation of the effort and time frame needed to duplicate the effort that was made for ECTMI.

Sara how feasible would it be to prepare account paperwork for the ECTMI company to obtain a Bear account?

Thanks,

Tom

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hemsley, Simon
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 12:04 PM
To:	Shah, Rajen; Jordan, Kevin D; Doukas, Tom; Wall, David
Cc:	Drew, Rachel
Subject:	FW: Investment companies

I will investigate getting an accounting entity set up for ECTMI - does anyone know the number?

in the meantime (and don't shout at me Tom) how easy would it be to change the ECTEF
broker account to have a new name - see company below

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wall, David
Sent:	26 September 2001 15:45
To:	Hemsley, Simon
Subject:	FW: Investment companies

We must move Anker as a matter of urgency.  Let's discuss.

Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jordan, Kevin D
Sent:	26 September 2001 15:42
To:	Wall, David; Seyfried, Bryan
Cc:	Aiken, Buddy; Allen, Melissa
Subject:	Investment companies

After speaking with David Wall about which entity the Anker debt and equity should be moved to, I placed a few quick phone calls.  I understand that there may be some confusion about what is an investment company, and which ones are available.

The ENA transaction support team suggested ECTMI (Enron Capital Trade Merchant Investments) as one possibility.  There may be another US investment company and an investment company set up in the Netherlands.  The people to follow up with would be Faith Killen and/or Elaine Shields who work in ECT accounting.

I hope this helps you identify where to move the investments.  Please keep me updated on the completion of that move.  AA will be sensitive to us making that transfer into the investment company in the quarter that we have booked earnings on the investment(s) as merchant investments.  As discussed with David Wall, that is consistent with Enron's corporate policy on merchant investments and with the Investment Company Audit Guide which governs our merchant investment accounting.

If you have any further questions or if I can be of further assistance, please contact me at ext. 35882.

Regards,

Kevin


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by William Gang/HOU/EES on 12/17/99 12:53 PM
---------------------------

William Gang
12/17/99 10:48 AM
To: Robert Frank/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Edwards AFB

Have you had a chance to take a cut at that transaction description for
Edwards yet?  I would like to get it to them for their chop this week, if
possible.  There has been a local storm of feces for employing outside
counsel (Squeri) apparently without Ms. Sharp's approval.  I don't know what
procedures Regulatory uses for outside counsel, but I have had to tell Jeff
that I can't pitch in and pay for  a part of Joe any more.  My boss got his
tail twisted, and now apparently has to respond to Pai/White on the matter.
Also, let's please discuss the strategic status of Edwards and how to go
forward.  Since Bear Trap yesterday, Edwards has been removed from the list
of authorized projects to pursue because it does not meet the TVC
threshhold.  However, I think its strategic value is such that we should not
cavalierly cast it aside.  What do you think?

Please give me a call.  I tried to contact you, but, alas, your line is as
busy as usual.


For those newcomers (and a reminder to the old timers),  there is a
departmental scanner is in cubicle no EB3884 which is adjacent from my
cubicle.  It has a good OCR progam, OmniPage Pro 10, for text scanning.
Please feel free to utilize the equipment and if you need assistance  feel
free to contact me--I'm right next door.

Best regards,
Taffy Milligan  X57373


Don't worry about picking us up at the airport.  I will be careful and brave
the elements.  See you tomorrow.

DG


Counterparties with whom DWR has option of fuel are GWF, Calpine, Dynegy, Coral, Sunrise, Sempra, Wellhead and Pacificorp

Best,
Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tycholiz, Barry
Sent:	Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:38 PM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	DWR Power Assets

Jeff, thanks again for attending the discussions with DWR.

Do you have any recon.... on exactly which plants DWR has the right to bring the fuel on. As Mark indicated, it was about 1/3 of their exposure, and most of that was in the south service area, but I am very interested in the actual facilities and whom used to bring fuel to them or run the units.'

There is a zero sum game on fuel... but the landscape changes depending on who buys it and how they buy it!

Any thoughts.

BT


is your dad ok?  what is hines?  is that a development firm?  i just didn't
call her last night.  you can't call them the next night.  that looks
pathetic if you do.  this way she can sit around and think about me for a
day.  she is a cool chick.  nice, cute sorority chick.  well let me know if
you go out.


---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Tezyk/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
05/07/2001 02:39 PM ---------------------------

Matthew Tezyk
05/07/2001 09:17 AM
To: charlie.weldon@enron.com, Scott Churbock/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Bill Fox/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Darrell
Stovall/NA/Enron@Enron, Mathew Gimble/HOU/ECT@ECT, Douglas
Ottens/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Update of Fuel Oil Analysis

Team,

Late last week, we were asked to provide a fuel oil specification sheet so
fuel could be scheduled for the Site at Ft. Pierce.  The issue, currently, is
we have three different specifications given to us over the past few months
and are unsure which is correct.  The resolution:  we are reviewing the
specifications from the air permit and specifications given to us from
Mitsubishi to determine the minimum requirements, for the fuel, which we must
meet for the air permit and gas turbine generator.  We anticipate this review
process to be complete by the middle of this week.  If there are any
questions, please feel free to contact me at 68258.

Thank you,

Matthew Tezyk


Max, would you call Tiffanie Wheeler at Reliant to discuss the volume discrepancy on 2/27/02.  Her number is 713-207-6790.  I believe she said that if we provide them with pipeline support from Tallahassee, they will adjust our bill.

Thanks.

Keep me posted.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Doner, Max
Sent:	Tuesday, March 26, 2002 10:49 AM
To:	Germany, Chris
Cc:	Dhont, Margaret
Subject:	City of Tallahassee Adjustments for February 2002

Chris,

Pam at the City of Tallahassee sent me her volume reports for February 2002.
There are two adjustments that will be made to their invoice.

The base volume will be increased from 100,000 dth to 104,793 dth.
This will increase our supply with Dominion which I believe you have been informed
by Dominion as well.
The Swing gas for 2/27/02 will be reduced by 450 to 1,550 due to an operational scheduling cut
from the Reliant pool.  The City of Tallahassee has already deducted this from their payment on
the original invoice.  In summary, I will be preparing an additional invoice to the City of Tallahassee
in the amount of $14,570.72.  I will let you know when payment is received on this adjustment.

Don't forget my State of Florida adjustments!

Thanks,
Max


---------------------- Forwarded by Reyna Cabrera/ET&S/Enron on 12/11/2000
01:43 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Dan Fancler                           10/26/2000 10:14 AM

To: Reyna Cabrera/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: OGE SBA #106081

If we need to cashout for operational reasons then $500,993.10 is a fair
price.

If we need the gas then they should pay the value of the gas which is
estimated at $728,274.40.

So the answer is
If we want the cashout get at least $500,993.
If they want the cashout and we need gas get $728,274.

Receivable


Daren,   Cody has a new well coming on Friday behind the 985333.  Right now
we don't have any nominations at that meter so I'll get with vance on that .
The increases according to the fax is going from 230@day to 1700 on friday
and 1700 to 3200 on sat.  PRIZE Energy would like to make some changes,

Meter

4028       from 1270 to 820          has been flowing from 600 to 800 this
month

4965       from 112 to 45                has been flowing mid 80's this month
                 from 97 to 104


I do not like to recieve these emails.  PLEASE update the dispatch log
immediately after being dispatched.

The Enron Canada dispatch log and updating the El Paso Reconciliation sheet
are considered to be important performance criteria (just like inadvertancy)
with regards to customer service and settlements

Bill

---------------------- Forwarded by Bill Williams III/PDX/ECT on 01/30/2001
07:05 AM ---------------------------

	From:  John Zufferli                           01/30/2001 05:51 AM

To: Bill Williams III/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Dispatch log

The last time that the dispatch log was updated was 1/27/01, can your guys
bring the log up to date?

Thanks


The deal with CMS needs a one page letter agreement. that states that the
release begins on the latter of the WIC Medicine Bow expansion being fully
in-service or January 1, 2002.  As strucutured here we would have recall
rights on this capacity which we could call enact for any of the volumes up
to the WIC in-service date.  We could not recall any capacity after that date
and we would give up those recall rights with a letter to WIC upon the
in-service date of the new pipeline.  Can you please start on this letter
agreement as a soon as possible?  The CMS guys are a little antsy and this is
a good deal for us. ( $1.3 MM)

Thanks

Mark
----- Forwarded by Mark Whitt/NA/Enron on 02/20/2001 11:07 AM -----

	Mark Whitt
	Sent by: Mark Whitt
	02/20/2001 11:03 AM

		 To: clancy.aschbrenner@coastalcorp.com, steven.saye@coastalcorp.com
		 cc: Paul T Lucci/NA/Enron@Enron, Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie
Miller/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: WIC Medicine Bow Release

As we discussed, ENA is going to release a portion of it's Medicine Bow
capacity to 2 different parties.  We would like to begin this process and
make sure we follow the proper procedures in the WIC tarriff.  In addition we
want to make sure that the releases are properly coordinated and go off
without a hitch.  The following are the terms of the releases and the
counterparties.

1.  Counterparty:  J M Huber Corp.
 Quantity:  10,336 MMbtu/d
 Term:   November 1, 2001 - the term of the contract
 Contract #   41066-000

2. Counterparty:  J M Huber Corp.
 Quantity:  42,337 MMbtu/d
 Term:   November 1, 2002 - the term of the contract
 Contract #   41066-000

3. Counterparty:  CMS Transmission and Storage
 Quantity:  7,172 MMbtu/d
 Term:   January 1, 2002 - the term of the contract
 Contract #   41066-000

4. Counterparty:  CMS Transmission and Storage
 Quantity:  1,015 MMbtu/d
 Term:   December 1, 2002 - the term of the contract
 Contract #   41066-000

5. Counterparty:  CMS Transmission and Storage
 Quantity:  1,015 MMbtu/d
 Term:   January 1, 2002 - November 30, 2002
 Contract #   41075-000 ( Volumetric Firm)

Each of these releases would be done with the following terms:

1.  First bidder meeting minimum terms
2.  Permanent release
3.  Hide the minimum rate
4.  The release will be at the contract rate
5.  The release will be recallable
6.  ENA will then follow up with a notice to WIC that we are giving up our
recall rights at a later date

Please let me know if this looks ok to you and let me know if each of these
parties are authorized to do capacity releases with WIC.

Thanks for your help.

Mark


I would like to announce the following management changes within the Analyst / Associate Program, which are effective immediately.

Traci Warner will assume responsibility for Recruiting for the Western Hemisphere.  Traci joined Enron's Associate Program in 1995 and has held positions in Business Development, Origination, and Public Relations at Enron Energy Services, Enron North America and Enron Broadband Services.

Ted Bland will assume responsibility for Career Development (including rotations) for the Western Hemisphere.  Ted has been with Enron since 1989 and has held several roles in Origination and Business Development within Enron Wholesale Services.  Most recently, Ted was assigned to the commercialization of some activities within Human Resources.

Anna Jansson, who is based in London, will continue to lead all efforts for the Associate / Analyst Program in the Eastern Hemisphere.  Anna has been with Enron Europe for the past three years and, most recently, has been responsible for setting up the EBS Human Resources function in Europe.

Please join me in working with Traci, Ted and Anna to ensure the success of this important program.

Billy Lemmons
Vice President, Analyst / Associate Program


don't want you to feel left out
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/22/2000 11:15
AM ---------------------------

"George Kutzschbach" <gkutzschbach@fulbright.com> on 12/22/2000 10:57:51 AM
To: kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com, peterthompson@akllp.com, Kay.Mann@enron.com,
lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com
cc: DPedigo@INTERGEN.com

Subject: CA Devel I & II Facilityl Agreements

Although InterGen has not completed its review of the Facility
Agreements, at Kay Mann's suggestion and to expedite matters, I am
passing on changes which InterGen requires with respect to Sections
17.3(a) and 17.4.1 of both Facility Agreements:

1.  Section 17.3(a) should be revised to read as follows:

"promptly refund the Maximum Liability Amount (less any unpaid portion
of the Purchase Amount) and pay Cover Damages plus Termination Costs
described in Sections 17.4.2(i) and 17.4.2(iv) described below; or"

2.  The third and fourth sentences of Section 17.4.1 should be revised
to read as follows:

"If the Maximum Liability Amount (less any unpaid portion of the
Purchase Amount) is greater than the Proper Scope Value, the difference
between such amount and the Proper Scope Value (the "Refund Amount")
shall be settled between the parties in accordance with Section 17.4.4
below.  If the Maximum Liability Amount (less any unpaid portion of the
Purchase Amount) is less than the Proper Scope Value, the difference
between such amount and the Proper Scope Value (the "Scope Value Due")
shall be settled between the parties in accordance with Section 17.4.4
below."

It is InterGen's understanding that the Purchase Amount is currently
$1,829,000, subject to adjustment by future change orders, and that the
amounts previously paid plus the Purchase Amount are equal to the
Maximum Liability Amount of $14,352,000, subject to adjustment by future
change orders.  It is essential to InterGen that CA Development I and CA
Development II receive credit for the amounts previously paid and that
they not be required to go outside of the Facility Agreement to
determine such amounts.

George Kutzschbach
713-651-3702


Here is the turbine description (expanded version).  If your received something with a table in it, that was sent out in error.

This decription is subject ENA legal review.

Steve


Dear fellow students,

As classes are about to end for the semester, we will be asked to complete
Instructor Evaluations Forms for each class taken. The evaluations are one
of the most effective tools we have as students to ensure the quality of
instruction remains high and our tuition dollars are used effectively. Both
the Student Advisory Committee and the Evening MBA Association work hard to
improve the program but our efforts become difficult when those professors
whom students felt were not up to par receive high marks.

The evaluations are used in deciding whether to invite instructors back to
the program. Club 6 is an elite group of professors that have received a
median evaluation of 6.0 or better. Students should consider a rating of 6
as a sign of an outstanding teacher. This will allow us to truly reward and
distinguish the professors that stand out.

Please keep the following in mind when considering the Instructor Evaluation
Forms.

1. Courses taught by multiple professors require multiple evaluations. Not
all instructors add the same value and we should recognize this. Please
differentiate your evaluations being specific about each professor and
his/her specific strenghts and weaknesses.

2. Some classes are more 'fun' than others. Please keep in mind that the
form clearly distingushes between the course strenghts and the instructor's
effectiveness in teaching the course. While some classes are not so popular,
the professors teaching those courses might be truly outstanding.

3. Many people reported to us that they did not have a reference scale to
guide them in making evaluation decisions. Keep in mind that 6 is considered
an above average performanace. The following is the reference scale provided
a while back. Please bring it to class or keep it in mind when evaluating
the faculty.

1 - Soo bad, it's less than 2
2 - So bad, it's less than 3
3 - Class had many critical faults. This instructor should not be
invited again unless major changes are made
4 - Class had some critical shortcomings, this instructor should be
invited again after some adjustments
5 - A good course, instructor in line with expectation for HAAS
instructors
6 - Excellent course, instructor generally superior to MOST other
instructors previously had
7 - Outstanding/walks on water

4. For your reference, the following is a link to the article in HaasNews
announcing the members if this elite club for the Fall 2000 semester.

http://www.haas.berkeley.edu/groups/newspubs/haasnews/archives/hn031901.html

On behalf of the EvMBAA Board of Directors, Thanks for your help in making
the Haas Evening MBA program the best it can be.

Ken Bruce
President, EvMBAA


I think he can do it, Vince, but UT has asked him to speak at a Leadership
conference also on 2/16, which Rick Causey is encouraging him to do.  He has
all the information (I just sent it home in his mail as he returned this
afternoon from a week of travel), so will press him to make a decision
tomorrow.  He may decide to do both or one or the other...I'll let you know
as soon as I do.  SRS

Vince J Kaminski@ECT
10/12/2000 04:57 PM
To: Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Spring 2001 Conference Participation by Jeffrey K. Skilling

Sherri,

Any resolution of the scheduling conflict Jeff Skilling had for February the
22nd?
Our friends at UT are ready to make the reservations and send out invitations
to this conference

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 10/12/2000
05:00 PM ---------------------------

"Ehud I. Ronn" <eronn@mail.utexas.edu> on 10/12/2000 10:12:56 AM
To: Richard.Causey@enron.com, Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: Spring 2001 Conference Participation by Jeffrey K. Skilling

Rick / Vince:

Good morning.

Further to my discussions with Vince during his visit to the Energy Finance
Program yesterday, I write at this time to inquire whether Mr. Skilling's
assistant has been able to confirm his participation as 2/22/2001 keynote
speaker at our Conference.

With thanks for your intercession on our behalf,
Ehud Ronn

==============================================
     Ehud I. Ronn
     Professor of Finance and Jack S. Josey Professor in Energy Studies
     Director, Center for Energy Finance Education and Research
     McCombs School of Business
     University of Texas at Austin
     Austin, TX. 78712-1179
     Voice:  (512) 471-5853
      FAX:   (512) 471-5073
      Internet:  eronn@mail.utexas.edu
=================================================


I have attached the current estimate.  I am not sure it is right because I was confused on how they have been booking it.  I feel comfortable that the total year is right.  Its the line that totals $118 for the year.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lev, Jennifer
Sent:	Tuesday, October 09, 2001 3:11 PM
To:	Geaccone, Tracy
Subject:	RE: September Capital Charge

Was this already estimated for the current estimate, or should I just estimate and include in flash?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Geaccone, Tracy
Sent:	Tuesday, October 09, 2001 3:07 PM
To:	Lev, Jennifer
Subject:	FW: September Capital Charge

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Schwarzbach, Stephen
Sent:	Tuesday, October 09, 2001 2:57 PM
To:	Killen, Faith; Cook, Hazel; Evans, Stephen; Smith, Jeff E.; Ueckert, Allen W.; Tran, Agatha; Kaster, Mei-Ling; Boyd, Mike; Selzer, Howard; Galvan, Michael S.; May, Kevin; Lee, Dana; Nelson, Kimberley (EES); Geaccone, Tracy; Copeland, Erin; Smith, Kirk; Pritt, Deborah; Schield, Elaine; Davoli, Jim
Cc:	West, Terry
Subject:	September Capital Charge

Sorry for the late notice, but here's the info on September capital charge:

As was done for the 2Q flash in June, we will be using an estimate for the September Capital Charge.  However, unlike last time, we will rely on each of you to estimate your September (and Q3) capital charge, since we will be truing up to actuals YTD in October.  Please send us (myself and Terry West) what you will be incorporating into your flash.  If you have any questions, please give one of us a call.

Thanks,
Steve and Terry


Plese continue to send this guy the curves.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Luong, Steven
Sent:	Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:05 AM
To:	Suarez, John; Miller, Jeffrey
Subject:	RE: Curve Sheet

No problem.  The latest curve I have is like a week old, so if you guys are still updating them, please copy me when you send them out.  Thanks.

Steve

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Suarez, John
Sent:	Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:52 AM
To:	Luong, Steven; Miller, Jeffrey
Subject:	RE: Curve Sheet

I was out of the office when you sent this.  Did you get the information you needed?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Luong, Steven
Sent:	Monday, January 14, 2002 10:19 AM
To:	Suarez, John; Miller, Jeffrey
Subject:	RE: Curve Sheet

Can you send me the latest curves?  Thanks.

Steve

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Suarez, John
Sent:	Wednesday, January 09, 2002 9:33 AM
To:	Miller, Jeffrey; Luong, Steven
Subject:	RE: Curve Sheet

 << File: Curve Sheet.xls >>

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Miller, Jeffrey
Sent:	Wednesday, January 09, 2002 7:16 AM
To:	Suarez, John
Subject:	FW: Curve Sheet

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Miller, Jeffrey
Sent:	Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:30 AM
To:	Carson, Mike
Subject:	Curve Sheet

Please email to Steve Luong each day after updating the curves.

Thanks,
Jeff

 << File: Curve Sheet.xls >>


Wonderful.  One more question, could you give me the meter numbers for these
points?

"Immer, Ingrid" <Ingrid.Immer@Williams.com> on 12/20/2000 03:51:13 PM
To: "'chris.germany@enron.com'" <chris.germany@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: VNG Contract Volumes

Contr. No.????? Volume? (dt)??? Primary Rcpt/Del
3.1212? ??????? 14,625? ??????? Station 165 / Emporia

0.6507? ??????? ??? 556 ??????? UTOS / Leidy (545)
??????? ??????? ??????? ??????? Ragley / Leidy (11)

0.3924? ??????? 35,930? ??????? Sta 62 / Emporia (14,013)
??????? ??????? ??????? ??????? Sta 45 / Emporia (8,982)
??????? ??????? ??????? ??????? Sta 50 / Emporia (6,826)
??????? ??????? ??????? ??????? Sta 30 / Emporia (6,109)

0.3726? ??????? 15,930? ??????? Sta 62 / Emporia (6,213)
??????? ??????? ??????? ??????? Sta 45 / Emporia (6,691)
??????? ??????? ??????? ??????? Sta 50 / Emporia (9,717)
??????? ??????? ??????? ??????? Sta 30 / Emporia (2,708)

Note that the telescoped volumes on .3726 are cumulative and are incremental
on .3924.

ii


Following are the deals we've changed -

536574 - from Firm to Caiso energy
537885/886/888/889/890 - from Yes to No confirm

And I'm looking into the status of the price on 538874. I'll let you know.

Thanks,
Kate


Hope you feel better soon!


Please see the attached revised form of opinion for HQ.  Since we will not
require HQ joinder of Master, I revised the opinion to reflect its primary
coverage of the Guaranty.  I believe this will clarify the opinion matters
for this mornings discussions.  Mary

Please forward as necessary

Enron North America Corp.
Mary Cook
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  ? 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Crude     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/crude13.pdf
Natural Gas     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/ngas13.pdf

Jan WTI/Brent Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/clf-qof.pdf
Jan Heat Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/heatcrack.pdf
Jan Gas Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/gascrack.pdf
Dec/May Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hoz-hok.pdf
Jan/Feb Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hof-hog.pdf
Dec Gas/Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/huz-hoz.pdf
Feb Gas/Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hug-hog.pdf
Dec/Mar Unlead Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/huz-huh.pdf

Nat Gas Strip Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/StripmatrixNG13.pdf
Nat Gas Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixNG13.pdf

Crude and Products Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixCL13.pdf


I would like to come to discuss several issues that I have outlined in the
accompanying
attachment.


I am not sure what process is in place, but at first glance, I am not sure what this letter says, except to perhaps acknowledge that they have some reason to be concerned.

Notwithstanding the tone of the commercial discussions and negotiations to date, I am concerned that the MAC letter had an obvious purpose, which should not to be discounted.  Moreover, we cannot lose this financing, and they need to be aware that they wear the risk of improperly or capriciously declaring a MAC.

Firstly, I think we need to send a written response that, although balanced is more direct (i.e. more than a comfort letter), that makes it clear that there is no reasonable basis for a MAC, thereby putting OPIC to (polite) notice that there is risk to them in not funding.  The points need to be that the recent disclosures involving Enron are not in any event material, particularly in this case, given that they are lending against the value of the project, relative to the amount of their takeout financing and with our subdebt/equity obligation, and therefore that nothing has changed form the commitment they originally made.

Secondly, we need to eliminate this risk being deferred into the Financing Agreement by focusing carefully on, and appropriately qualifying, the reps, wars, covenants and MAC conditions embodied in the Financing Agreement, to ensure that we do not merely defer this risk to the funding date.

Finally, given that they have sent the letter and the circumstances, I think we need to be careful not to make admissions that could come back to allow them to legitimize not funding.  As such, should not our response and our meetings be clearly expressed as being on a without prejudice basis?

Peter.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dutt, Ranabir
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 8:27 AM
To:	Anderson, Peter N.
Cc:	Hardy Jr, John; Keohane, Peter; Gonzalez, Orlando; Wiggs, Brett; Deffner, Joseph; Engeldorf, Roseann; Chin, Julia H.
Subject:	Letter to OPIC

Peter:

Attached is the letter that John proposed with my mark-up.  Let me know if you have any comments.  I am hoping to send it out this morning prior to our meeting tomorrow.

Ranabir

 << File: Letter to OPIC, Nov 19.doc >>


I accept the terms & conditions of this Pilot Participation Agreement.

Kay Mann


Notice No. 01-441
December 21, 2001

TO:		All NYMEX and COMEX Division Members
		All NYMEX and COMEX Division Clearing Members
		All NYMEX and COMEX Division Member Firms

FROM:	J. Robert Collins, Jr., President

RE:		Discontinuation of Listing New Months for FTSE Eurotop 100

and Eurotop 300
 Futures Contracts

The Exchange is discontinuing listing new months for the FTSE Eurotop 100

and Eurotop 300
 futures contracts effective immediately.


Vince,
It was a pleasure talking with you earlier today. Please read the documents I
have attached with this email. Let's talk in the near future to continue our
conversation. I am very confident that my team and I can be successful
regarding any staffing need you have.? I will give Sheila in HR a call and
see if we can work out a contract. Please visit our web site for up-to-date
information at http://www.mrportland.com
Thank you for your time and have a nice day.

Sincerely,

Johan Dahl
Director Energy Staffing Group
Phone: 1-503-287-8701 ext. 1153
Email: jdahl@mrportland.com

 - JCD-Client Broch-Energy #2.doc
 - Charter of Ethical Practice.doc


Dear Dan.

Due to the time schedule and uncertainty regarding the eta Fujairah,
we desided to not nominating bunkers for topping up this time.
The vessel's rob on arrival Qalhat will be abt F.O. 3800mt and G.O.
155 mt.

Best regards

Capt Kjell Kvammen  LNG/C "HOEGH GALLEON"

Brgds Oe. Hansen
Master

E-mail: master.gall@hoegh.no
Teleph: Inmarsat tel.no. 330853910
Fax   : Inmarsat fax no. 330853913
Telex : Inmarsat B telex no.330853915
Telex : Inmarsat C telex no.430853910 (24hrs.watch)


Lads

Latest version...found a minor typo.

Dave


ok, so you probably already guessed that today's game is rained out and you
dont need me e-mailing you about it but i just cant help myself.  anyways,
the game will be made up next Tuesday 10/17 at 6:15 pm at delta park on the
budweiser field.  hope everyone can make it then too.
chris


I await a credit sheet from the credit dept to put a draft together.  I spoke
to them today re this issue.  What is the term for the transaction or
transactions w/ this customer?

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Here is your conversation with my revisions marked (deletions struck through,
insertions in bold).  Hope this helps but feel free to call or write with any
questions or comments:

A:   The CFTC regulates futures contracts and certain kinds of option
contracts.
SP:  What's a futures contract?
A:  It is a contract for the sale of a certain kind of  commodity through a
regulated  exchange.
SP:  How is the contract different than a non-futures contract?
A:  Ahem,   just for your information, we call the non-futures contracts
forward or over the counter contracts.  The big difference is that the
forward contract does not must go to delivery while futures contracts do not.
SP:  I though the futures contracts went to delivery.  I remember getting all
messed up on the gas side with delivery of NYMEX futures gas at the Henry
Hub, and what about those stories of a guys getting a load of soy beans
dumped in their front yards?
A:  Well, er,  yes they do sometimes  go to delivery, but they are not really
supposed to relatively few of them go to delivery.  They are supposed to
more frequently (actually the vast majority of the time) net out as financial
transactions.  It's that option of settling financially that distinguishes
the futures contract.
SP:  Well lets get to the point,  why are physical buy sells so bad?
A:  That's easy.  Because they look like futures contracts.  They are not
intended to go to delivery.  And if you are trading in futures contracts you
are supposed to be doing it on a CFTC regulated exchange.
SP:  So what you are saying is that if we deliberately net out our physical
deals and never intend to even try to schedule delivery under them we are
trading in futures contracts and could be subject to regulation by the CFTC?
A:  You've got it.  But it's even worse than that - federal law says that a
futures contract which is not traded on a regulated exchange is illegal: not
only could the CFTC come after you but your counterparties could use that law
against you to get out of performing.  So you can think of each contract like
that as having written a free option.
SP:  Well how much physicality do we have to have to make it a forward
contract?
A:  What do you mean?
SP:  Well, if we settled physically one day a month but financially the other
29 days, would we have a futures contract?
A:  Oh for Christ's sake I've had it.   I'm telling you once and for all that
physical buy sells are futures contracts and you can't do them now get the
hell out of my office!--

Is this the basic idea and if so,  how much can we blend physical into it to
cross the line into the domain of the forward contract?  --Christian

Basically, yes.  A lot has to do with the look and feel of the thing but also
the parties' intentions.  If we do not intend to make and take delivery, if
we intend to settle financially - or even intend to just have the option to
settle financially, we have a problem.  The closest thing we have to an
exception to this is the provision for cover damages when one party fails to
deliver.  That is a provision in the contract that might be argued gives one
party the right to settle financially just by failing to perform.  We argue
that this is still a forward and not a future because the parties in good
faith intend initially that delivery will be made and a default occurs when
there is a failure to make or take delivery.  Unfortunately, in the power
world a large percentage of contracts may in fact get booked out.  However,
each party enters into those contracts knowing that they have an obligation
to make or take delivery and the book-outs may or may not happen - we do not
enter into those contracts knowing that they will be booked out.  The
book-outs occur after the fact by mutual agreement at the time of the
book-out.  In fact, if we didn't want to book them out, we could stand on our
legal rights and require all of our counterparties to make and take delivery
(although I assume this might not go over well with many of them or with our
scheduling desk if a book-out would be more convenient at the time).


Hi Jeffrey,

Attached please find your Fall 2001 CONFIRMED class schedule.  Textbooks
and readers will be ordered for you based on this confirmed schedule.  NO
CHANGES TO SCHEDULE UNTIL AUGUST 27.  Any changes, please fill out an
add/drop form in the Evening MBA office in August.

Have a nice summer Jeffrey!

Thanks,

TJ
 - FinalSchedule.rtf


I'm about to move the deals.  Please hold off the calc until you hear from me.  Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Love, Phillip M.
Sent:	Wednesday, January 23, 2002 1:33 PM
To:	Cheung, Cecilia
Subject:	RE: termination list for deals to be moved to bankruptcy book

Please let me know when you get close to being complete so that we can hold off calcing if necessary.  Thanks.
PL

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cheung, Cecilia
Sent:	Wednesday, January 23, 2002 1:31 PM
To:	Love, Phillip M.
Cc:	Gossett, Jeffrey C.
Subject:	RE: termination list for deals to be moved to bankruptcy book

No, it's not done yet cos' I was busy yesterday and just got back from UBS meeting.  Will work on this now.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Love, Phillip M.
Sent:	Wednesday, January 23, 2002 1:25 PM
To:	Cheung, Cecilia
Cc:	Gossett, Jeffrey C.
Subject:	RE: termination list for deals to be moved to bankruptcy book

Just curious if this got done last night?
PL

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gossett, Jeffrey C.
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 3:58 PM
To:	Giron, Darron C.; Love, Phillip M.
Subject:	FW: termination list for deals to be moved to bankruptcy book

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mulvany, Patrick
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 3:58 PM
To:	Cheung, Cecilia
Cc:	Gossett, Jeffrey C.; Theriot, Kim S.; Miller, Don (Asset Mktg)
Subject:	termination list for deals to be moved to bankruptcy book

Cecilia,

Here is the list of Counterparties that have been requested:

CP ID	     Counterparty

504	     Alabama Gas Corporation
8	     Amerada Hess Corporation
64516	     Avista Corporation
55265	     Avista Energy, Inc.
68247	     Bankers Trust International PLC
65291	     BP Corporation North America Inc.
410	     Burlington Resources, Inc.
23848	     Cabot Oil & Gas Marketing Corporation
79689	     Calpine Energy Services, L.P.
5264	     Cargill, Incorporated
881	     Central Illinois Light Company
65599	     CMS Field Services Inc.
69	     Columbia Energy Services Corporation
56630	     Consolidated Energy Solutions, Inc.
26427	     Consumers Gas Company, LTD.
74362	     Continental Gas, Inc.
52577	     Cornerstone Propane, L.P.
1424	Florida Power Corporation
55109	Hess Energy Trading Company LLC
3796	Hunt Petroleum Corporation
1901	Kaztex Energy Management Inc.
2094	Marathon Oil Company
53782	National Energy & Trade, L.L.C.
5563	New York Mercantile Exchange
64141	NJR Energy Services Company
155	Noble Gas Marketing Inc.
151	Northern Illinois Gas Company
69121	NRG Power Marketing Inc.
63665	Occidental Energy Marketing, Inc.
54438	PG&E Energy Trading, Canada Corporation
58402	PG&E Energy Trading-Gas Corporation
46709	Phibro Inc.
55776	Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.
33367	PMI Trading, LTD
49262	Questar Energy Trading Company
65268	Reliant Energy Services, Inc.
187	San Diego Gas & Electric Company
103469	Sequent Energy Management, L.P.
3996	Sithe Energies, Inc.
26146	Societe Generale
11134	St. Mary Land & Exploration Company
3022	Texaco Natural Gas Inc.
81385	The New Power Company
37810	Venoco, Inc.
96651	Vitol Capital Management Ltd.
46924	Vitol S.A.
232	Western Gas Resources, Inc.
237	Wisconsin Power And Light Company


Isabel and Greg,

I'm having a logistical problem.  The only managing director of Salmon is not
in the office today.  I can have the membership certificates signed by (1) a
vice president or (1)  the managing member or (3) elect a new managing
director.  What's your preference?

Kay


Left him a message earlier.  Haven't heard back yet.  I'll call him again first thing in the AM.  He's probably busy getting his number changed.

Best,
Jeff


Danny,
I received three letters stating that since I am no longer with Enron I can access and move my savings plan.  These three letters, no one but three is very upsetting right before Christmas. I was going to call you but I hate to brother your hoilday.  I pray this is a huge oversight but yet I received three letters. I will call Gary and Fran on Wednesday hope that they are in the office and can assist me.  Happy holidays.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


Gee, one more item for your review.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/19/2001 06:00
PM ---------------------------

"Lang, Gregory F." <gregorylang@paulhastings.com> on 04/19/2001 05:59:10 PM
To: "'ccampbell@kslaw.com'" <ccampbell@kslaw.com>, "'kay.mann@enron.com'"
<kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "'iparker@freshfields.com'" <iparker@freshfields.com>,
"'lisa.obrien@freshfields.com'" <lisa.obrien@freshfields.com>

Subject: GE Guaranty Comments

"paulhastings.com" made the following annotations on 04/19/01 18:59:28
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NEW E-MAIL ADDRESSES AT PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP

We have changed our e-mail address.  Our new domain name is
paulhastings.com.  In most cases, our address is composed of
conventional first name and last name plus @paulhastings.com.  Here are
two examples: janesmith@paulhastings.com and danjones@paulhastings.com.
If you have any questions, please contact us at noc@paulhastings.com.

==============================================================================
"The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity
to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the
material from all computers."

==============================================================================

Kay - Carolyn asked  me to forward to you our few comments to the GE Parent
Guaranty to forward to  the appropriate person(s) at GE.? They are attached
in a pdf file. Our  comments are limited to the inclusion of a notice and
consent of the collateral  assignment of the Recipient's rights under the
Guaranty and to conform the  governing law clause to the other GE delivered
documents in this transaction.  Please feel free to call me or to have the
appropriate person at GE contact me  with any questions.
?
Greg
?
Gregory F.  Lang
Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker  LLP
1055 Washington Blvd.
Stamford, CT 06901
?
203.961.7446 (p)
203.674.7646 (direct fax)
203.359.3031 (firm fax)
gregorylang@paulhastings.com
?
 - Stamford.pdf


---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 04/11/2000
11:54 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Brenda F Herod                           04/10/2000 05:24 PM

To: Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Michael C Bilberry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian M Riley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J
Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gregory L Sharp/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Edward D Gottlob/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Coastal Deal-With Exxon Participation under the Project
Agreement

Thanks for the info!

As Greg mentioned in the staff meeting today, the intent is that this
restructured deal is papered effective 4/1/00.  The impact is potentially
that the gas is not pathed properly by counterparty or on the appropriate
transport/gathering agreements, etc.  If any rates are changing, then those
need to be changed in our systems also.  There may be other areas of changes
also - I'm not attempting to list them all.  Rather I just want to make
people aware that retroactive deals can have impacts on the daily operations.

Thanks for the information.

Pat/Daren:  Can you get with Mike and/or Brian to determine the potential
impact, if any?  Thanks.

	From:  Steve Van Hooser                           04/10/2000 03:06 PM

To: Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Michael C Bilberry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian M Riley/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Coastal Deal-With Exxon Participation under the Project Agreement

Brenda,

Per your request, attached are the Draft documents which will be used to
finalize the new  Gathering Arrangment between HPL and Coastal, the revenue
sharing arrangement between Exxon and HPL (Transaction Agreement) and the
Residue Gas Purchase Agreement between Coastal, as Seller and HPL as Buyer
(Amendment to Wellhead purchase agreeement).

I do not have a copy of the Processing Agreement between Exxon and Coastal,
as such agreement does not involve us (and I believe it is far from
finalized. The only other document that I plan to prepare is a termination
agreement relative to the current Liquifiables Purchase Agreement between
Exxon as purchaser and HPL as seller--this termination will be affective as
of 4/1/2000.

If I can be of any further assistance, please let me know.

Steve


In order to better align our engineering and operations capabilities with the
commercial businesses they support, we are pleased to announce the following
organizational change will be effective immediately.  A new business unit,
Enron Engineering and Operational Services (EEOS), is being formed which will
include our existing operations in Enron Engineering and Construction Company
(EE&CC), Operational Energy Corporation (OEC), and National Energy Production
Corporation (NEPCO).

Brian Stanley, as President and Chief Executive Officer, and Keith Dodson, as
Chief Operating Officer will provide the leadership for this new
organization, reporting to the Office of the Chairman of Enron Wholesale
Services.  NEPCO will continue to operate as a stand-alone business under
John Gillis, President.

With the majority of EE&CC and OEC,s activities focused on assets and
projects which are in Wholesale Services, this will better align the efforts
of EEOS with the commercial businesses it supports.  While EEOS will be a
stand-alone unit within Enron Wholesale Services it will work very closely
with and have direct accountability to the business units it supports.

This realignment also centralizes our engineering and operations capabilities
in a single business segment and should ensure that innovation and best
practices are shared and implemented across our many operations and will also
allow for better identification of priorities and more effective allocation
of resources to these projects.  Consistent with this approach, Development
Engineering will have dual reporting to both EEOS and the business units
which they support.

With an extensive and varied portfolio of assets around the world and a wide
variety of new development opportunities available to Enron, it is critical
that we continue to maintain the best in class capability to design,
construct, commission, and effectively manage and operate Enron,s assets on a
global basis.

This new global business unit should insure that we will continue to enhance
these demonstrated capabilities and provide us with a sustainable advantage
as we advance our business strategy around the world.

Please join us in congratulating Brian and Keith on their new assignments.

Mark Frevert & Dave Delainey


I don't think that Govt Affairs should do anything on this (and not sure if there is anything to do).

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Thursday, November 01, 2001 6:22 PM
To:	Shapiro, Richard; Kean, Steven J.; Steffes, James D.; Mara, Susan; Denne, Karen; Palmer, Mark A. (PR)
Subject:	Peace Letter to CalPERS

I saw the letter from Peace to CalPERS.  As far as I know, Peace can't force CalPERS to do anything, including file a shareholder suit.  Therefore, I'm not sure if we gain anything by responding, or taking other action.  Thoughts?

Best,
Jeff


Sorry, I was at a floor meeting.  I'm looking now.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nemec, Gerald
Sent:	Wednesday, December 19, 2001 10:48 AM
To:	Elledge, Susan
Subject:	More Contracts

Susan,  Could you look for and email me the following:

Storage Agreement with Montana Power
Interruptible Storage Agreement with WBI
Transport Agreement with Trailblazer Pipeline Company (Think it was dated around 1995)

Sorry for the sketchy info, but that is all that I have.  Thanks.


---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 01/26/2000
01:01 PM ---------------------------
From: Lee L Papayoti on 01/26/2000 12:06 PM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, O'Neal D
Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Sitara # 92886

For Feb00, any gas taken by Global Octanes will be priced off of Gas Daily
rather than IF .... I've changed the sitara ticket .... but one of you
gentlemen needs to take care of risk assignment impact ....

Lee


I will not be in the office tomorrow.  Please contact me today if we need to
discuss anything.  Thanks.  Sara


---------------------- Forwarded by Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT on 10/22/2000
03:31 PM ---------------------------

Robin Rodrigue
10/13/2000 09:03 AM
To: Shannon McPearson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brooklyn Couch/HOU/EES@EES,
rerodrigue@hotmail.com
cc:
Subject: FW: For my Friends

For those tired of the usual "friend" poems, a touch of truth!

When you are sad,.............I will get you drunk and help you plot revenge
against the scum sucking bastard who made you sad.
When you are scared,.........I will laugh at you and tease you about it
every chance I get.
When you are worried,.........I will tell you how much worse it could be and
to quit complaining.
When you are confused,........I will use little words to explain it to your
dumb butt.
When you are sick.........I will hold your hair while you pay homage to the
porcelain god.
When you fall......I will point and laugh at your clumsy butt.
This is my oath...............I pledge this till the end.
Why you may ask?...............Because you're my friend.

Hope it made you laugh - but you know I got your back!!!!!!!!


perfect.
the -$108,000 (=$18,000 * 6 days) adjustments will be made in your 11/27/01 P&L tonight.

thanks for your help on this,
Fran

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Scholtes, Diana
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 12:35 PM
To:	Chang, Fran
Subject:	RE: one more issue left with NCPA deals

ok try again

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Chang, Fran
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 11:02 AM
To:	Scholtes, Diana
Subject:	FW: one more issue left with NCPA deals

oops, also the annuity for the 7th is with volume of 24MW/hr, should it be 25MW/hr?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Chang, Fran
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 10:59 AM
To:	Scholtes, Diana
Subject:	one more issue left with NCPA deals

the annuity deal is not yet scheduled for 11/22.

-Fran

 -----Original Mess age-----
From: 	Scholtes, Diana
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 10:19 AM
To:	Chang, Fran
Subject:	RE: NCPA deal review

the 2nd is fixed

ds

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Chang, Fran
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 9:55 AM
To:	Scholtes, Diana; Crandall, Sean
Subject:	NCPA deal review
Importance:	High

Diana and Sean:

Up to 11/26/01,
1. we are missing the annuities for 11/7, 11/18, 11/19, 11/22, 11/23, and 11/24
2. we need to restore HE23-24 for deal# 517676.1 for 11/2/01 (lightload sale in NP15) in scheduling

Please let me know if you need any help entering the annuities or restoring the HE23-HE24 scheduling (for 11/2/01 for deal 517676.1).

As the month-end is approaching, I am hoping we can clear the above issues up before Settlements captures the wrong P&L.

Thanks,

Fran


Please put this on my calendar if you haven't already.

fletch

---------------------- Forwarded by Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT on 08/07/2000
04:09 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Lynn Pikofsky @ ENRON                           08/03/2000 04:35 PM

To: Laura Luce/Corp/Enron@Enron, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fletcher J
Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim Hermann/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bill Brogan/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Barry Tycholiz/CAL/ECT@ECT, Richard Tomaski/Corp/Enron@Enron, Cary M
Carrabine/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chris Sonneborn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Courtney/HOU/ECT@ECT, D.wear@pecorp.com
cc: Airam Arteaga/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Alliance Meeting

Please mark you calendars for Thursday August 10th for the Alliance Meeting.
This meeting will be all day.  The location will be EB32C2.  Please let me
know if you have any questions.

Thank you,
Lynn
(312) 541-1379


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Hall, Steve C. (Legal)
Sent:	Wednesday, November 28, 2001 4:04 PM
To:	Hall, Steve C. (Legal)
Subject:	FW: Draft script for getting broker quotes

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hall, Steve C. (Legal)
Sent:	Wednesday, November 28, 2001 4:04 PM
To:	Sager, Elizabeth; Yoder, Christian
Cc:	Belden, Tim
Subject:	Draft script for getting broker quotes

Elizabeth,

Here is a quick draft at a script to get some broker quotes.  Unfortunately, we will not be able to get firm quotes because our counterparties will not give them to us.  As a consequence, we will only be able to get indicative quotes from brokers.  I am assuming that you are preoccupied with other pressing matters; If I don't hear from you by tomorrow on this, I will distribute this to the term traders, and then we can improve the script later.---sch

Hi,

I'm calling you back to go over the spreadsheet you sent me.  I need to make a record of this.  Could you please spell your name for me and give me your phone number?  And you work at ________?  Great.

I sent you a spreadsheet showing different delivery points and durations for the delivery of power.  Is that right?

And I asked you to provide indicative market prices for these products?  Is that right?

Were you able to provide some indicative prices?

How did you get those prices?

Do you believe that these prices accurately and substantially represent market prices at which counterparties would buy and sell power today, November ____, 2001?

Great.  Thank you.


I think you are just trying to avoid me!  It's been two weeks, huh?

I'll be up late tonight watching the national championship, so give me a call
when you get in.

-e

Shirley Elliott <shelliott@dttus.com> on 01/04/2000 10:53:41 AM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

   are you back at work yet?  sorry i didn't call last night but i got home
   pretty late and had to do some stuff.  i'll try to call you tonight but
   probably won't get home until after 10.

   shirley


Greg,

Michael asked me to get back to you regarding ICE's all-share Offer for IPE.

Summary of Offer

The key aspects of the Offer are as follows:

? It comprises a share-for-share exchange of 1 ICE Class A1 Share and 1 ICE
Class B (Redeemable) Share for each IPE Share (note that ICE Shares are not
listed on any exchange).

? The following values (given by Goldman Sachs and KPMG) have been ascribed
to each such ICE Share:

 - each ICE Class A1 Share has an estimated value ranging from $1.75 to $6.11
 - assuming redemption, each ICE Class B Share has an estimated value ranging
from $4.80 to $5.33
 - assuming no redemption, each ICE Class B Share has an estimated value in
the same range as each A1 Share

? Class B Shares allow for certain rights of redemption by ICE for cash,
namely $5.895 per share.  Redemption rights arise for a period of one month
from the first anniversary of the date on which the IPE Brent Futures and the
Gasoil Futures Contracts have traded exclusively for 10 consecutive trading
days through the electronic trading platform.  Redemption rights also arise
in other circumstances, e.g. if ICE is the subject of an insolvency event.
After the first redemption event to occur, non-redeemed Class B Shares
(redemption is at the option of the shareholder) automatically convert to
Class A1 Shares.

? Although ICE Shares will not be listed, it is expected that there will be a
limited dealing facility through which Class B shareholders will be able to
trade.

? The electronic trading platform referred to above will be developed by ICE
through a technical services agreement.

? Class A Shares are transferable to any transferee, subject to ICE board
consent, not to be unreasonably withheld.  Other than in relation to the
redemption rights described above, Class B Shares have identical rights to
Class A Shares.

? Assuming all of the IPE Holdings shares are acquired by ICE, then the IPE
Holdings' shareholders will hold 10% of the issued share capital of ICE.

? The Offer is subject to valid acceptances being received by 29 May in
respect of at least 90% of the value of IPE Holdings shares (or any lower %
determined by ICE, but being at least 50%).

Other Points to Note

? Enron's current shareholding in IPE Holdings is 136,720 shares (this is
equivalent to 1.19% of the total share capital of IPE Holdings).

? Those members of ICE (or companies associated with members of ICE) having
shareholdings in IPE Holdings account for 9.83% of the total share capital of
IPE Holdings. You should therefore assume that acceptances will be received
at least as to 9.83%.

? If ICE receives acceptances as to 90% or more of the IPE Holdings shares,
then our shares in IPE Holdings can be mandatorily acquired.

? If we are to make a competing offer, we will needed to have appointed a
financial advisor, carried out necessary due diligence and preferably
discussed details with IPE's management. Bearing in mind the closing date of
29 May, we would have to move quickly if we are to make an offer. (This is
assuming that acceptances in excess of 50% have not been received by that
time - however, institutional investors tend to deliver acceptances only at
the last minute).  We could make an announcement prior to the closing date of
29 May that we were considering making an offer, although the prior approval
of the Takeover Panel would be needed  - and a short timetable would be set
by the Panel for announcing full details of the offer, if we were to
proceed.

? Given the particular components of ICE's offer (e.g. retained equity in
ICE; the complementary nature of the ICE and IPE businesses; and the critical
participation of ICE in developing IPE's electronic trading platform), we
should consider carefully the terms of any competing offer we may decide to
make.

Please would you let me know what further steps you would like to take
(including whether you would accept the ICE Offer), and if there is any
further information you need. (I will send you separately by fax a copy of
the Offer Document).

Thanks
Justin


Vince,
As we discussed, subject to minor changes the attached paper will appear in
the J of Applied Corporate Planning.  I'd be most interested in your
comments.
By the way, if you like the yield curve generation process described in the
paper, we'd be happy to perform a simulation, so that you can compare the
results based on the to the HJM procees.
I look forward to getting together with you when you come to NY to attend
the GARP conference, around February 13.  Just give me a brief warning.
Regards,
Andy
Andrew Kalotay Associates, Inc.
(212) 482-0900
andy@kalotay.com

Visit our web-site http://www.kalotay.com

 - FAS133 article.doc


Here are the next four descriptions.  Per Awais's message below, he is still
trying to get these by today.  I know it is a little late....let me know if
this will be an issue.  Please give me your comments so I can coordinate
responses.  Thanks!
---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 09/03/99 01:18 PM
---------------------------

Awais Omar
09/03/99 12:31 PM
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: EnronOnline Market Descriptions

Sorry for the delay.

Here are the next four descriptions.

Only the three liquids one waiting now.

I have sent these to David Forster in our Project group to review first
before I send them to yourself.  If I don't get them back today I will send
them over the weekend so they are there for you on Monday.

Could you please send me comments back on all the other descriptions today.
Is your fax machine at your end OK?  It's just that the other fax you sent
came through a dark background making the comments a little hard to read.

My fax is 44 171 316 5420.

Awais

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Tana Jones                           01/09/99 23:13

To: Awais Omar/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: EnronOnline Market Descriptions

Awais,

I have forwarded the descriptions you have sent us thus far to the respective
Legal Trading Lawyers to sign off as far any legal issues we may have with
the descriptions.  I understand your deadline is the end of the week.

When can I expect the remaining descriptions?


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  ? 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now in the most recent version of Adobe Acrobat 4.0 and they
should print clearly from Adobe Acrobat Reader 3.0 or higher. Adobe Acrobat
Reader 4.0 may be downloaded for FREE from www.adobe.com.

(See attached file: UnleadedStocks.pdf)(See attached file:
CrudeDeviation(xJun90-Jan91).pdf)(See attached file: HeatingOilStocks.pdf)
(See attached file: API.pdf)(See attached file: CrudeStocks.pdf)
 - UnleadedStocks.pdf
 - CrudeDeviation(xJun90-Jan91).pdf
 - HeatingOilStocks.pdf
 - API.pdf
 - CrudeStocks.pdf


---------------------- Forwarded by Louise Kitchen/LON/ECT on 08/03/2000
11:58 ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Dave Krunnfusz" <dkrunnfusz@agency.com>
08/03/2000 11:38

Please respond to dkrunnfusz@agency.com
To: lkitchen@enron.co.uk
cc:  (bcc: Louise Kitchen/LON/ECT)

Subject: Followup

Louise -

I haven't received a response to my e-mail of last week indicating I was
coming to London and would welcome the opportunity to finally meet
face-to-face. If you are available and interested,  please let me know
as I am definitely interested (if, for no other reason, then to put a
face to a name and voice).

On another topic,  I recently found out that we briefly displayed a
slide at a conference that had the Enron logo on it.  I was told we did
not verbally state the company name. I went ballistic! I've made sure we
talked with the conference organizers to make sure that none of the
offending material is distributed to the conference participants. I
deeply regret that the incident occurred.

Again, I would still like to get together and, if you wish, promise to
keep it purely social with no business discussions. The offer is there.
Let me know.

Sincerely,
Dave

--
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
David A. Krunnfusz
Executive Vice President, Delivery Services
AGENCY.COM
225 N. Michigan Ave, Suite 2100, Chicago, IL 60601
dkrunnfusz@agency.com     www.agency.com
Office: (312)729-4567      Fax: (312)729-4540


Kevin,
After reviewing the list of NRC meetings coming up, Fred has notified me of
the two he thinks are of significance for attendance.  They are:

1. 11/30/01 - Surry 1, 2 - Discuss significance of failed piston wrist pins
& piston carrier bearings in the Number 3 Emergency Diesel Generator which
may have caused it to fail if needed to operate a long period.
HGP Comment: This may give insight on Surry 1 refueling and possible
shutdown of Surry 2 for mitigation of problem.  This will also impact other
plants with the same EDGs.

2. 12/12/01 - Ginna - Discuss status of RG&E evaluation regarding
circumferential cracking of the reactor vessel head penetration nozzles.
HGP Comment: This should provide info on whether Ginna will be required to
shutdown for inspection and additional info on other area PWRs concerning
shutdown inspection schedules.

Please let me know if you agree that we should attend. Currently we have
attended seven meetings of the eight allowed by the contract through
November.  None of the meetings for early December are of significance.  It
is highly unlikely that any significant meetings will be scheduled for late
December.  So, the above two meetings should probably be the last of
significance for the calendar year.

Dan


Hello, everyone.  I'm hoping you know of someone who would be a good fit for an interesting opportunity in Market Risk Management in RAC:

We're looking for a director level accountant or risk management operations person who can join the Strategic Risk Management (SRM) group within Market Risk Management to work on the Asset/Liability piece of Enterprise Risk Management project as we team up with Vince Kaminski's Research group on this challenging new initiative.

The ideal candidate would have Enron experience and be a good project manager, accustomed to working in self-directed situations, able to work with and gain the team support of  mid and upper level management in  research, accounting, risk management operations, finance, treasury, RAC, the business units, etc..  They would need to be able to articulate for top support and commercial management any project issues and implementation challenges, and would be working with risk mgmt operations and the business units on the implementation efforts and process design.  Someone able to take full responsibility for this long term project from its infancy through completion, designing a plan of attack, and then leading the implementation effort.  This person might also act as a consultant for SRM's other initiatives that impact accounting.  Ideally, of course, this person would understand risk management (risk books, trading operations, etc.), but someone who understands the different types of risks inherent in our strategic assets and accrual accounting contracts might also be a good fit if they're self-motivated and willing to dig in and learn the risk management business.

I think it's a great opportunity for someone to broaden their resume and gain market risk management expertise.  We've met with top risk management consultants, and this is a cutting edge initiative that will put us head and shoulders above our peers.

If you want to forward this to potential candidates, below are some links to websites that may provide some overview information on asset-liability / EW risk management (I haven't reviewed the sites myself yet).  Also, Vince's outline on Enterprise Risk Management from early last year is attached below.

Please call me if you know of someone who might be interested.

Thanks for your help,

Cassandra.
713 853-0429
713 858-2618 cell

<http://www.almprofessional.com/>

<http://www.risk-conferences.com/alm2001usa/>

<http://www.contingencyanalysis.com/glossaryassetliabilitymanagement.htm>


We plan to send this out Friday.  Cynthia will provide copies to the Hill as
she sees appropriate.  Any comments?


Lenny,

I believe that you must have done your home work on the the tax credit
issue.  However, it may
make sense to create some kind of reserve in case the tax credit is removed
in the future.

I am glad that you like the way we treat the tax credit, which is built into
the strike price for the
digital option. With the tax credit,  it is most likely the option will be
exercised.

Paulo  Issler is the person who worked on this model initially. He will be
back this Wednesday.
We can talk to him about the standard deviation he put into the model.

Zimin

Lenny Hochschild@ENRON
02/12/2001 08:15 AM
To: Zimin Lu/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Synfuel option valuation

Zimin,

Thanks for your e-mail.  Sorry for the late reply, I was travelling last week.
I'm under the impression that the with the new administration, there is a
greater chance that Section 29 will be extended beyond 2007 than repealed. If
this happens, we contractually have the right to extend this contract. We
have not valued the chance of this happening, so I don't think we should
value the chance of this not happening.

Anyways, let me speak to my supervisor on this and revert.

In the meantime, I looked over the amendment you made with regard to adding
the second strike of the tax credit and think this is now reflective of the
deal and am happy with it. I still do not understand a few things re:  where
did the St. deviations come from. I believe you said that someone who works
for you put this together but was away last week.

Please revert with his/her name so that I can get together and understand
this.

Thanks.
Lenny

Zimin Lu@ECT
02/06/2001 01:09 PM
To: Lenny Hochschild/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Eric Groves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Synfuel option valuation

Lenny,

I think we had a good discussion about the deal valuation.
One thing, I think you are prefectly aware of it, is that the economics
of this deal is driven by the tax credit ($25.03).  The risk on our side
is that if the tax credit is removed, AIG will not deliver the synfuel
 and pay $4.55 to us.

Vince mentioned that Congress might act  quickly enough to eliminate
the tax benefit.   I just want to remind you we should take this risk
into consideration.

Zimin

PS:
I changed the results in sheet1 slightly. The values in column A was shifted
by 0.5.  Use the attached model.


thanks for info, i gave it to jackie. i am trying to
send workshop info, but am having hard time. don't
know too much about computers,e-mail, thanks

 - Concert Workshop.doc


i will try to do that tomorrow


Keith,

Attached is GTC Spot confirm form  and Spot GTC

Please take a look at the attached Spot GTC and let me know if we can
transact under
this contract.  This is what our legal guys would prefer.  Talk to you soon.

Thank you,

Kevin


Torrey,
	Well we finally have a final product description for our Sonat tier 2 product.  Tami DePaolis and Jeff Hodge have given there OK.
	Attached is the description along with some additional language for penalties that need to be included in the description and confirmations
	as well.  If you have any questions please give me or Tammi a call.

	thanx


Diana - are you tracking this?
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 11/06/2000 09:12 AM
---------------------------
From: James D Steffes@ENRON on 11/06/2000 07:56 AM CST
To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Steve
Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: FTR and RTO Seams

Sue, etal --

Not sure if you had seen this.  How should we follow these issues (people,
time, etc.)?  Is this important?  I'd appreciate any comments.

Jim

----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 11/06/2000 07:55 AM -----

	Richard Ingersoll@ECT
	11/05/2000 07:29 PM

		 To: Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: FTR and RTO Seams

----- Forwarded by Richard Ingersoll/HOU/ECT on 11/05/2000 06:27 PM -----

	"Alaywan, Ziad" <ZAlaywan@caiso.com>
	Sent by: Maiser@wscc.com
	11/03/2000 04:21 PM

		 To: "Western Market Interface Committee" <wmic@wscc.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: FTR and RTO Seams

Attached is a summary of the California FTR product, how to schedule, and
the timeline.  To access the issues around the Seams between California,
Northwest, and the Southwest, we need to understand the FTR characteristics
for all the three RTOs.  This is a starting point for discussion during next
weeks conference call and the Dec meeting.

Ziad

 <<FTR version new 11-1.doc>>

 - FTR version new 11-1.doc


Sara,

The version you distributed yesterday does not include the comments that I
sent to Scott Sefton last week.  Attached are my revisions.  You can feel
free to distribute to the broader group if you want.  I will get comments
from Rodney Faldyn and Bob Butts and then would like to distribute to LJM for
their review and execution.  Let me know if there are any outstanding
comments and/or issues.

Regards,

Ryan
----- Forwarded by Ryan Siurek/Corp/Enron on 10/19/2000 06:54 AM -----

	Kaye Ellis@ECT
	10/18/2000 12:05 PM

		 To: Scott Sefton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ryan Siurek/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gordon
McKillop/NA/Enron@ENRON, AnnMarie Tiller/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Randy
Young/NA/Enron@Enron, Gregory Adams/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bob
Butts/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Frank Stabler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
mspradling@velaw.com, jdilg@velaw.com, Donette Dewar/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent
Vasconcellos/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Raptor 2 hedge

I am resending this email for the benefit of those of you who did not receive
it on October 5.

----- Forwarded by Kaye Ellis/HOU/ECT on 10/18/2000 11:59 AM -----

	Sara Shackleton
	Sent by: Kaye Ellis
	10/05/2000 02:24 PM

		 To: Scott Sefton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ryan Siurek/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gordon
McKillop/NA/Enron@ENRON, AnnMarie Tiller/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Randy
Young/NA/Enron@Enron, Gregory Adams/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bob
Butts/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Frank Stabler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
mspradling@velaw.com, jdilg@velaw.com, Donette Dewar/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent
Vasconcellos/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Raptor 2 hedge

Attached is the revised Raptor 2 hedge.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Vann, Suzanne
Sent:	Wednesday, January 23, 2002 3:49 PM
To:	Tucker, Patrick; Slone, Jeanie; Ward, Kim S (Houston); Capestany, Mari; McCaffrey, Deirdre; Arnold, Matthew; Cross, Edith; Jenkins, Beth; Mckay, Jonathan; Ralston, Andrew; Peterson, Stephen; Myers, Steve; Neff, Brandon; Golden, Jeff; Greg Branan (E-mail); Amy Wilson (E-mail); Beth Cowan (E-mail); Courtney Tardy (E-mail); John Harrell (E-mail); Joseph Gordon (E-mail); Michael Smythe (E-mail); Rob Wheeler (E-mail); Robert McDonald (E-mail); Terri Hamby (E-mail); Pierce Owens (E-mail); 'lori_e_black@yahoo.com'; 'chris_herron@yahoo.com'
Subject:	Happy Hour

Come join us for a happy hour next Wednesday the 30th at 6:00pm at King Biscuit located close to downtown in the Houston Heights.  There are many people left off of this because we do not have their e-mail.  Please forward the information along.

King Biscuit Patio Cafe
1606 White Oak Drive
Houston, TX 77009-7630
Phone: (713) 861-2328
http://houston.citysearch.com/profile/9848625/

<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Microsoft Clip Gallery>


Please note that the Expense Account Close Deadline is at the end of the day Tomorrow.


Sorry I think you sent this e-mail to the wrong man. But a agree whole heartedly.
regards
ali

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	07 August 2001 19:40
To:	Coleman, Alistair
Subject:	FW: MHI 501 F Disposition Planning

Progress since your email - We did have a meeting too with the owners of the turbine book (Calger, Jacoby and Wiggs) last Thursday.  Clearly we are pursuing all avenues to sell, mitigate, place as many of the turbines as soon as possible.  I am also suggesting that we look as to whether we could negotiate a cancellation with Mitsubishi.

Ben can provide you with more detail of where we are with each customer, if you want a copy of what they gave me let me know.  But generally I probably want rid of these turbines more than anyone.

Louise
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Saturday, July 21, 2001 10:56 AM
To:	Jacoby, Ben; Wiggs, Brett; Calger, Christopher F.
Subject:	RE: MHI 501 F Disposition Planning

Thanks I'll wait for the report.

Have a good week-end

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jacoby, Ben
Sent:	Saturday, July 21, 2001 9:42 AM
To:	Kitchen, Louise; Wiggs, Brett; Calger, Christopher F.
Subject:	RE: MHI 501 F Disposition Planning

Louise:

We are presently working with Jody Pierce to get the accounting system for the turbine book in place, and a turbine report form prepared. We will have this to you in the next 10 business days. The only recent news is the sale of the steam turbine for $400k, and that we intend to utilize an outside consulting firm (Navigant) to enhance our ability to get some interest going on the SW501D5A. Lastly, we are reviewing the possibility of having the Ft. Pierce project use MHI unit #3 instead of unit #1 in light of the apparent market interest in units 1 and 2, and the current Ft. Pierce construction schedule which is better suited for unit #3 than unit #1.

Mike Coleman is putting together a budget and program to monitor (from a technical perspective) and maintain the 501D5A and the 501Fs.

Please let me know if you have any other questions.

Regards,

Ben

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Friday, July 20, 2001 8:16 AM
To:	Wiggs, Brett; Jacoby, Ben; Calger, Christopher F.
Subject:	FW: MHI 501 F Disposition Planning

All valid points - I wouldn't mind an update on where we are on the turbine book (including yesterday's good news).

Thanks

Louise

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Coleman, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, July 19, 2001 5:50 PM
To:	Wiggs, Brett; Jacoby, Ben; Calger, Christopher F.
Cc:	Virgo, Robert; Mays, Wayne; Tapscott, Ron; Fairley, David; Golden, Bruce; Kitchen, Louise
Subject:	MHI 501 F Disposition Planning

With the shipment of two of the four units from MHI scheduled for August and no viable place to ship them, our exposure to increasing costs associated with these units will start to climb quickly.  We need to move agressively to minimize our risk in this position.

Based on discussion with a number of people, I would strongly recommend that we make full efforts to sell units 1 and 2 as quickly as possible.  John Garrison has identified a number of potential buyers, and I believe that Brett Wiggs in in communication with one or more of them as we speak.

We should inform MHI that we will now target unit 3 for Fort Pierce, given the slowdown in the Fort Pierce schedule and the inability to get further reductions in pricing from MHI on unit 1.  If we also drop the dual fuel requirement for Fort Pierce, we should provide some project savings to that project.  Prior to informing MHI, we shoud have Jackson Chaeng status the auxiliaries for unit 3 so we have a basis for understanding any appropriate cancellation costs.

I also recommend that we tentatively target unit 4 for Tallahassee, unless sale of units 1 and 2 were contingent on delivering a 3rd unit to a buyer.  In the next three weeks we will review Tallahassee versus best turbine fit and availability of alternative equipment to determine if we want to continue to target unit 4 to that project.

Finally, MHI has requested that we allow an extention of ship date for unit 1 from August 2 to the end of August.  I think it is in our best interests to agree to that directly, given that we can't tell them where to ship it and would immediately face claims for storage costs if we insist on an August 2 ship date.  We should ask that they forgo storage costs on auxiliaries until the later ship date.

Probably everyone knows some of this, and some know all of this, but hopefully the overall picture is of value.

Thanks!

Mike Coleman


Hi Ed,

I can't find (or recall) that I received the subsequent email referenced in
this email.  Can you direct me to the right place?  I looked under
Administrator and Legal Net X, and all my emails from 3/8.

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/12/2001 01:46
PM ---------------------------
From: Ed B Hearn III@ECT on 03/08/2001 04:26 PM
To: Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Roseann
Engeldorf/Enron@EnronXGate, Lisa Bills/Enron@EnronXGate, Scott
Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Brian D
Barto/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dean Russell/SF/ECT@ECT, Bill
Williams/PDX/ECT@ECT, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ed B Hearn III/HOU/ECT@ECT,
pthompson@akllp.com, stephen.swift@ps.ge.com, michael.barnas@ps.ge.com,
kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com, Bob Carter/HOU/ECT@ECT, John G
Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Secure Website for Enron/GE Turbine Contract Negotiation

Ladies and Gentlemen:

This afternoon you will receive a Logon ID and Password to a secure website
known as LegalNetEx ("LNX").   LNX will provide the Enron/GE Turbine Contract

Team with a centralized location for the efficient and organized exchange of
contract drafts and revision proposals.  It works like this:

1.  When you log on to LNX, a set of instructions will lead you to the most
recent version of the contract.   To review and revise the contract you will

download the document onto your PC or LAN.

2. Consistent with normal drafting, you will need to save your revised
version of the contract on your system, under a new name.

3. When you are ready to provide your revised version of the contract to the
rest of the team, you will upload the your document onto LNX.  Peter Thompson
will
receive an automatic email from LNX each time a team member uploads a revised
document.

4.  When Peter  has incorporated the various revisions proposed by the team,
he will upload the resulting revision cycle on LNX.    Each team member will

receive an automatic email notification when Peter uploads the latest and
greatest version of the contract.

Additionally, you will not have to redline your document for the group, LNX
will handle redlining for us, it's automatic, too.

If you have questions or difficulties with LNX, please contact Matt
Troncelliti of LegalNetEx using either matt@internetex.com or 610/617-1753.

For nontechnical questions or comments, please feel free to contact me, Ed
Hearn, using either ed.b.hearn.iii@enron.com or 713/853-1592.

Thank you,
Ed


Vlady..
this was the list John referenced the other day.
Ted
---------------------- Forwarded by Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT on 08/09/2000 02:30 PM
---------------------------

From:  Ted Murphy
06/28/2000 07:45 AM

To: Rick Buy
cc:
Subject: VAR Priorities

Rick,
This is my initial attempt to summarize our meeting with John.  The next
steps would be to solicit feedback from other interested parties and scope
the resources and responsibilities.
Ted

Rick Buy, John Lavorato and I met to discuss priorities as it relates to the
calculation of VAR.  We are making the following recommendations

 1) Inclusion of monthly index positions into VAR calculations as the
indicies set in North American Natural Gas
 2) Development of a methodology to re-run correlations (factor loadings)
including criteria, responsibilities and acceptance/rejection criteria
 3) Development of process by which to analyze the output of factor loading
process.  Database to store output and management reports.
 4) Finalize debate on the calculation of Forward/Forward volatility
 5) Scope a project to analyze the possibility of calculating hourly
volatility for power.

It was further recommended that we continue to not include unpriced index
positions in VAR calculation.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/19/2001
05:27 PM ---------------------------

Al Arfsten <arfsten@bflassociates.com> on 01/16/2001 03:12:48 PM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Collaborative Effort

Vince:  I am very enthusiastic about your interest and possible
contributions towards a 22nd Century human blood system.  I have
attached a letter that discusses the endeavor.  Please note that it has
a built-in automatic release in the event you need to terminate.  It has
a confidentiality statement as well.  If it is acceptable, please sign
it and fax it back to me at 713 965 2114 at your earliest convenience.
Al Arfsten

 - Kaminski Acceptance  011601.doc


The following is a level "A" cost estimate to make TW/ Lonestar existing interconnects bi-directional.

TW/ Lonestar at Ward County ( 50 to 60 mmcf/d)

According to Operations this is already bi-directional . The only things are required on this one is to take the flapper out of the check-valve
and blow down the gas in 5.33 miles of 12".

Cost of gas loss& labor = $8,000

TW/ Lonestar at Pecos County ( 100 mmcf/d)

A): TW/ Lonestar interconnect

	Scope: On this one we need a bi-directional valve skid using the existing meter run.
	Cost of material& labor= $ 195,000

B): Pecos Compressor Station

    	 In order to make this interconnect bi-directional we also need to make the station ( two-compressor units) bi-directional.

Scope: Install outlet from Lonestar I/C to inlet filter with 12" piping& valves. Unit discharge would be modified to
tie in to West Texas-20"

Cost for material& labor= $ 330,000.

If you need more accurate costs ( B -release) please let me know .

	Total cost estimate for this project = $ 533,000.


Please give Andy your comments by 1:00pm today.


Attached is an outline of the EBS redeployment plans.  Please advise if you
have any questions.

Marla Barnard (marla_barnard@enron.net)
Vice President - Human Resources
Enron Broadband Services
713-345-8158 (Office)
713-646-2678 (Fax)


cal 04-08 Rockies