---------------------- Forwarded by Dana Davis/HOU/ECT on 09/18/2000 05:00 PM
---------------------------

"IMAP" <jcampbell@ddo2.defensivedriver.com> on 09/18/2000 03:05:36 PM
To: <dana.davis@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Re: DDO QUESTION SUBMISSION

Dana,
If you complete the course by 3:00pm on any weekday, we will print mail out
your Certificate of Completion the same day.  All Certificates are mailed
out via US Mail unless the student selects to have their Certificate sent to
them via our express delivery option.  We use Federal Express and charge an
additional $20.00 for this service.  We ask all students to allow 7-10
business days if their Certificate is mailed via US Mail or if you select to
have it sent FedEx your Certificate will be delivered the following day by
3:00pm.

If you have any other questions, please contact me at 888-547-9272.

Sincerely,
Jyll Campbell
Office Administrator
----- Original Message -----
From: <dana.davis@enron.com>
To: <support@defensivedriver.com>
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2000 2:36 PM
Subject: DDO QUESTION SUBMISSION

>
> Mozilla/4.74 [en] (WinNT; U)
> NAME: Dana Davis
> DL NUMBER: 15044825
> How long will it take to get the certificate of completion back?
>
>
>


INDIVIDUAL.COM

Here's an article recommended by: Karen  Denne
and it comes to you via Individual.com, Inc.

The following message was attached:

HERE IS THE STORY WE WERE REQUESTED TO SEND YOU

This story appeared on http://www.individual.com December 11, 2000
_________________________________________________________

Calif. Restarts Dirty Power Plants

By JENNIFER COLEMAN
Associated Press Writer
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) via NewsEdge Corporation  -
Hoping to ease the state's electricity
crisis, air-quality regulators Friday allowed the restart of
several power plants in Southern California that had been shut down
because they had reached air pollution limits.

The move came a day after California encountered an
unprecedented power crunch, with electricity supplies for the
state's 34 million people so perilously low that California only
narrowly avoided blackouts.

The power crunch has been blamed on cold weather in the
Northwest, the shutdown of some generating plants for repairs or
other reasons, and the effects of utility deregulation in
California.

On Thursday, during the emergency, power plants capable of
producing 2,400 megawatts were off-line because they had exceeded
their pollution limits. One megawatt is sufficient to power about
1,000 homes.

On Friday, the South Coast Air Quality Management District
agreed to let some of those polluting power plants return to
operation and restore about half of that lost generating capacity.
However, those plants will have to pay daily fines.

Restarting the over-polluting plants should provide a cushion
for state, said Stephanie McCorkle, a spokeswoman for the
California Independent System Operator, which runs the state's
power grid.

In addition, hundreds of companies voluntarily cut consumption
Friday to avoid imposed outages.

``We're still encouraging conservation efforts,'' said Lori
O'Donley, spokeswoman for the ISO. ``We're optimistic that we won't
have to'' impose shutdowns on commercial customers.

Federal energy regulators are working with the state to find
power that can be diverted to California during the crunch, moves
that could include increasing hydroelectric generation out of
state.

The power grid's managers were able to avoid blackouts Thursday
by shutting down the enormous state and federal pumps that push
water from Northern California to central and southern regions.

The phased-in deregulation of California's $20 billion
electrical power industry was supposed to lower prices by creating
greater competition. But demand for electricity has outstripped
supply, in part because of a growing population and a booming
high-tech economy.

Electricity is also in short supply because energy companies
held off building new power plants while deregulation was in the
planning stages. In addition, deregulation has forced utilities to
sell off their power-generating assets, such as dams and plants,
and import electricity from neighboring states, where power demand
is high right now because of a cold snap.

_________________________________________________________

Individual.com is the #1 provider of free, individualized news
and information to business people over the Internet.  Visit us at
http://www.individual.com to browse the largest free collection of business,
financial, industry, trade, and company-specific news and information
on the web.

This news story was sent by Karen  Denne through Individual.com.
You will not receive email messages directly from Individual.com
unless you register at http://www.individual.com.

Get more headlines and stories like this delivered FREE to your
desktop every business morning! Register at
http://www.individual.com/welcome.shtml.

Individual.com also brings you FREE news on your investments!
Sign up at http://www.individual.com/welcome.shtml.
___________________________________________________________

Entire contents Copyright , 1999-2000, Individual.comv, Inc.,
8 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA, 01803, USA


They should be open for power.

Leslie

	Tana Jones
	08/23/2000 10:57 AM

		 To: Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Teresa Mandola/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: First Energy Trading Services Inc.

Leslie,

Theresa Mandola with EOL called and the referenced counterparty called her
and is already trading gas with us and would like to start trading power
online.  I looked in my database and we have them shut down for power.  Is
this a counterparty we could open up for power or not?


Story on Enron's recent loss of market cap -- and explains that the pub is
NOT owned by Enron

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 07/11/2001 08:47 AM -----

	"US Publishing" <brice@restructuringtoday.com>
	07/11/2001 11:38 AM
	Please respond to brice

		 To: "RT Reader" <brice@restructuringtoday.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Restructuring Today Wednesday July 11 2001

(see attached file:  rt010711.pdf)

Thank you,

Season Hawksley
US Publishing
800-486-8201
202-298-8201
 - rt010711.pdf


I added a fee of 0.0075 to this deal.

Thanks,
Kate

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
01/22/2001 11:18 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: fee

497570, broker has fee on this trade.

thanks


Maybe this will help cheer you up - I know how much you love cats!
---------------------- Forwarded by Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT on 10/18/2000 03:26
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Jared Kaiser                           10/17/2000 03:10 PM

To: John Craig Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan W
Pereira/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fw: cat clip............

---------------------- Forwarded by Jared Kaiser/HOU/ECT on 10/17/2000 03:10
PM ---------------------------

"David Kaiser" <davidk@spawglass.com> on 10/17/2000 08:21:23 AM
To: "Jared @ Enron" <jkaiser@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Fw: cat clip............

----- Original Message -----
From: Heidi Jo Warnick <hwarnick@spawglass.com>
To: David Kaiser <Davidk@spawglass.com>
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2000 2:28 PM
Subject: cat clip............

> Just  a thought to cheer you up after hauling around all those plans.
>
> Heidi Jo Warnick
> Estimating Secretary
> SpawGlass Contractors, Inc.
>

 - SCCat.MPG


The East desk's No. 1 priority for RTOs is The Real Time Energy Market (no
day ahead balanced schedule requirement).  This means that the RTO should
post the supply and demand curve with real time prices (the best example at
this time is PJM's real time market).  A real time energy market is
fundamental for customers to get proper real time price signals upon which to
base their decisions to hedge or not on a forward basis.  It also provides
the proper price signals to the market on where generation and transmission
is needed.  Getting a real time energy market would advance Enron's ability
to provide more financial tools to customers.  This market can be nodal (or
zonal) in order to send location based price signals (for example, to NY
City), with the ability to aggregate from nodal to zone determined "proxy
buses."

While Kevin prefers the physical flowgate model with an option to collect
congestion revenues (rather than an obligation, similar to the PJM FTRs now),
the method of determining the congestion management is secondary to the
establishment of the real time energy market.  Regulatory people should use
their judgment (and talk with the desk) when determining how far to push
option-type flowgates, rather than obligation-type FTRs.  Such a physical
market transmission/congestion market can support a financial trading overlay.

If you do have an FTR type system, there should be an upfront allocation to
load.  Ideally, the load should have an "network" right from the generator to
their load (or from load to the "hubs") in order to have the ability to
manage the congestion risk in the forward market when serving end use
customers (EES) or for the ENA full requirements deals.  The nodes should be
grouped into logical "zones" and congestion within a zone should be uplifted.
This allocation to customers (or full blown auction of all rights) becomes
critical in Enron's ability to serve load and all requirements customers.
Without the proper allocation (not to incumbent utilties), the risk premium
to serve these customers becomes too high and can't be priced.

Finally, the market should have no price caps and preferably no icap market
like NEPOOL (prefer PJM's system where the load has to show the RTO that it
has contracted for enough reserves.)  We have urged the FERC in Florida to
adopt a reserve monitoring system, whereby customers are not penalized for
lack of icap unless they actually go under the reserve requirement, then they
are required to purchase icap for a certain amount of time until they
demonstrate continued compliance.

Bottom line -- "Do not let the perfect be the enemy of the good."  Congestion
does not need to be perfectly allocated to each load if that mechanism is
done in a manner that precludes Enron and others from developing efficient
real time energy markets that send a locational hourly price signal to the
generation (supply) and the load (demand).  This type of market will provide
greater services to customers and allow Enron to grow its business.

Finally, as we work toward this goal, remember that in the absence of a
real-time energy market, we need to continue to focus our efforts on
non-discriminatory treatment with respect to transmission (no native load
exception) and parking and lending, scheduling flexibility, etc.


First and most important, for those of you that have room reservations at The
Woodlands Resort and Conference Center, if you have any changes that need to
be made or have decided NOT to stay, I need to know immediately so that we
can cancel and are not charged for those rooms.
Please call me directly and do not contact The Woodlands Resort.  Please see
the "revised" Agenda and review the Rooming List for accuracy and advise of
any corrections at this time.

Geriann Warner and I will be out at the Woodlands for the March 9th meeting
only.  We will be in the office on Thursday if anyone needs assistance.
Please have your presentation to me by Thursday for those of you who are
giving presentations.  If we need to make copies of your presentation, please
advise as well.  Eric Benson will be present for the March 8th meeting.
Again, the location of the meeting will be:
The Woodlands Resort
2301 North Millbend Drive
The Woodlands, TX  77380
Phone# 281-367-1100
Fax# 281-364-6274
Check-In time is 3:00pm
Check-Out time is 12:00pm

The Woodlands Resort provides transportation service to and from the airport
on a scheduled basis from 6:00am - 10:00pm at a cost of $32.00 per person,
per trip.  Reservations must be made a minimum of 24 hours in advance for
both arrivals and departures.  If you have an interest in using this service,
please call the resort directly.
MAP:


Mike - thanks.   mcs

Steve - FYI.  mcs

Mike Dahlke@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
06/07/2000 14:09
To: Mark Schroeder@ECT
cc: Stella Chan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Korean Electric Restructuring - status

Mark,

"Early July" is upon us and it seems that the Electric Restructuring bill has
yet to be re-introduced in the Korean National Assembly.  I believe there is
about one month left in this session, which seems like a very short time to
consider such important legislation.  It seems the government has made
restructuring the banking system its first priority for this meeting of the
Assembly.  Commentators on the Korean economy have been consistent in
expressing concern about the state of the banking and insurance industries
where cosmetic changes have occurred but fundamental reforms have been few
and far between.  Mergers of many banks appear urgent to salvage a few strong
banks that can be competitive in a global capital marker.  However, there is
resistance both from both executives and labor.  With a new coalition,
President Kim may feel that he has to focus his efforts and not risk having
the electric reform "tabled" a second time, particularly if it might mean
facing the combined protest of the Banking and Electric sector unions.  There
is still some time yet for the Electricity to make on the agenda and the
evidence indicates the Administration remains committed to pushing forward
with Energy sector reforms.  Practically, however, the public debate may not
occur until this Fall.

I will let you know as I learn more about the status.

Mike D.


PGL and North Shore converted part of their index supply deal into a nymex fix price (basis is still floating).  Please amend the existing supply deal to reflect this change and confirm the supply contract ammendment as we discussed.  Feel free to call me if you have any questions.

PGL	5/01-10/02  	5000 mmbtu		$4.999  	Nymex only
NS	5/01-10/02	1250 mmbtu		$4.999	Nymex only

Richard


Damn you are hard to catch on the phone...  I know we can do the maint. in March but like this past year they sold the fuel through March and as a result we had to wait until April to start the maint.  That is what I am concerned with.  Have we made a committment on this fuel figuring a projected rate (based on your numbers below) of a 1071 which we could not reach with maint in March.
---------------------- Forwarded by David Roensch/ET&S/Enron on 12/12/2001 10:07 AM ---------------------------
From:	Darrell Schoolcraft/ENRON@enronXgate on 12/12/2001 09:50 AM CST
To:	David Roensch/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject:	RE: Schedule change request

It really doesn't matter if we have sold firm or not March is still available for maintenance, as we would do it through april, may or june.
To answer your firm question.  Jan. 02 1091, Feb. 1071. Mar. 1071, Apr. 1057, May 1057.  This is what I see right now you know how
things change.

DS

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Roensch, David
Sent:	Tuesday, December 11, 2001 6:35 PM
To:	Schoolcraft, Darrell
Subject:	RE: Schedule change request

Just checking... In the previous two years we had sold firm through March which prevented us from performing maint. in the month of March.  So, my question:  Have we sold firm through March yet or is that month still available for maint. if we push this schedule up?  If I'm not making any sense give me a call.
---------------------- Forwarded by David Roensch/ET&S/Enron on 12/11/2001 04:12 PM ---------------------------
From:	Jerry Graves/ENRON@enronXgate on 12/11/2001 03:20 PM CST
To:	Ronnie.Morse@enron.com@ENRON, Kimberly Watson/ENRON@enronXgate, Jan Moore/ENRON@enronXgate, David Roensch/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rich Jolly/ENRON@enronxgate
cc:	Gary.Maestas.EnronXGate@enron.com@SMTP@enronXgate, Gary Maestas/Enron@EnronXgate, Steven January/ENRON@enronXgate, Darrell Schoolcraft/ENRON@enronXgate, Gary Spraggins/ENRON@enronXgate, Morgan Gottsponer/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject:	RE: Schedule change request

  Yes Ronnie, I would still like to do that for 2 reasons.

1.	It moves the overhaul on unit 401 into March, which is the same month we are doing the tie-ins at Station 1 and 3. And since there will be a flow restriction from those tie-ins we can coordinate the two outages together and save a little of the flow loss.
2.	Starting and finishing the overhauls earlier will keep us away from our summer comments, if there are problems or delays.

       If  there are no objections, I will change the dates to the new schedule listed below.

Jerry Graves
713-345-8923

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ronnie.Morse@enron.com@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, December 11, 2001 2:28 PM
To:	Graves, Jerry
Cc:	Gary.Maestas.EnronXGate@enron.com; Maestas, Gary
Subject:	Schedule change request

Jerry, A while back you suggested moving the overhauls up at Station 4 to
March 1st, 2002. If its still works for you lets give it a try. The only
concerns at this time may be parts delivery time, but I think we will be
ok. The recommended outage dates are listed below. Let me know if this will
work for you. Thanks!

Ronnie........

401 start date 3-1-2002, Completion date 4-9-2001
402 start date 4-11-2002, Completion date 4-21-2001
403 start date 4-23-2001, Completion date 5-3-2001


This is the last email I have on the issue of consequentials/LOL.  As I
recall, we have not agreed to the redaction of the carve out of the LOL for
gross negligence, but it is an important issue for GE.

Steve Swift wants to close out these issues.  Are we ready, or do we need
this for a swap for something?

Kay

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/22/2000 08:57
AM ---------------------------

michael.barnas@ps.ge.com on 10/04/2000 12:40:51 PM
To: Sheila.Tweed@enron.com, Ben.Jacoby@enron.com, Scott.Dieball@enron.com,
kay.mann@enron.com
cc: kent.shoemaker@ss.ps.ge.com, stephen.swift@ps.ge.com

Subject: RE: GE CONFERENCE CALL

Folks,

Here is some language for discussion this afternoon.  Please note that this
is being submitted for discussion without full management approval; we're
getting so close to the bone that we'll probably need to take the final
package as a whole through our vetting process

I'm looking through the warranty section now, so perhaps we can discuss that
as well.

Ciao,

 Mike
g _____________
Michael C. Barnas
Counsel, Power Plants Commercial Operations
GE Power Systems
One River Road - Building 37, Room 307
Schenectady,  NY 12345  USA
Phone 8*235-7602       (518) 385 7602
Fax     8*235 5466        (518) 385 5466
Mobile 518 369 9538

 - WorldHungerModsOct2.DOC


Gregg,

It is my understanding that Enron and Peoples intend to discuss the most
appropriate form of ISDA documentation for enovate to use. Peoples has
forwarded a form for our information, and we would like to reciprocate.

Therefore, attached per your request are sample ISDA documents as a starting
point for discussions.  Since these are forms, there will certainly be
aspects which will need revision based on discussions between Peoples and
Enron.  These documents should be treated as confidential.

Kay


Gentleman,

Kevin Presto concurred on the purchase of a site license as recommended by
Vince.  What are the thoughts of others?  I am available to demo the package
if others would like to see it.

Thanks,
Lance
---------------------- Forwarded by Lance Cunningham/NA/Enron on 11/20/2000
01:51 PM ---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski@ECT
11/10/2000 09:16 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Lewis/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim
Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, tim.heizenrader@enron.com, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT,
George Hopley/HOU/ECT@ect
cc: Lance Cunningham/NA/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Site License for Power World

Gentlemen,

I recommend that we purchase this package and split the cost 3 ways between 3
power trading desks.
I think that we should go for option 3 (~ $15,000).

Lance Cunningham in my group looked at this software package and found it
very useful for modeling transmission problems.
Please, feel free to ask him for technical details in support of this
recommendation.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 11/10/2000
09:17 AM ---------------------------

Lance Cunningham@ENRON on 11/09/2000 06:15:14 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vasant Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Site License for Power World

Vince,

We have three options to increase our availability across Enron for the Power
World load flow software.

Option 1, Upgrade to a site license for the load flow software only. Price
$9,990.00
This would give all of Enron the ability to perform load flows, but not
determine marginal cost or available transfer capacity (ATC) because only the
Optimal Power Flow (OPF) version can perform that task.

Option 2, Site license for the load flow and purchase 1 OPF package for
Walter Coffer's group.  Price $11,240.
This would give all of Enron  the ability to perform load flows and one other
group the ability to determine marginal cost and ATC.

Option 3, Site license for load flows, OPF and ATC.  Price $14,990.00
This would give all of Enron  the ability to perform load flows, marginal
cost, and ATC.

Regards,
Lance


Jeff, I assume that you are providing a review for Mike L Miller.

Thanks
Dave


As you will note from the attached e-mails there is some confusion regarding
this bankrupcy. I have asked Linda Guinn to coordinate with you to make sure
Enron is doing everything we need to do.
----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 07/23/2000 08:34 AM -----

	Linda R Guinn
	07/17/2000 08:33 AM

		 To: Brenda McAfee/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: (bcc: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT)
		 Subject: Re: Michael Petroleum Corp. Bankruptcy/Case No.99-50569

Brenda:

I just got back from vacation and  read your e-mail regarding this
bankruptcy.  Keeping that in mind, no bells are ringing about this
bankruptcy.  If a POC was filed, it was done by Bonnie.  She handles most
everything (inhouse) for us.  Please check her files.  I assume that Britt is
stepping in for her while she's on vacation????  Let me know if you find a
POC (if none was filed, then the ballot issue appears to be moot).

Thanks,
Linda

	Brenda McAfee@ENRON
	07/13/2000 02:22 PM

		 To: Linda R Guinn/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Bonnie White/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Michael Petroleum Corp. Bankruptcy/Case No.99-50569

Linda,
 Bonnie White asked me to work with you on gathering information about this
bankruptcy.  The following sets forth the deadline schedule that I obtained
from Pacer regarding this matter:

 1)  6/12/00   - Voting Record Date to determine which creditors or entitled
to vote to
       accept or reject the Plan
 2)  7/21/00 @ 4:00 pm  - Objections due to Confirmation of the Plan
 3)  7/21/00 @ 4:00 pm  - Deadline for ballots to accept or reject the Plan

 4)  7/27/00 @ 9:30 am  - Confirmation hearing on the Plan
 5)  7/31/00 @ 4:00 pm  - Objections due to assignment by Adair Supply
 6)  8/14/00 @ 11:30 am  - Hearing re objections to claims of Enogex Expl.

I obtained from PACER a copy of the Claims Register Report and it lists ECT
as having filed a claim on 3/23/00--but it does not reflect how much is the
total claim.  Also, included in Debtor's 2d Amended Jt Disclosure Statement,
it reflects that  Class 4 Creditors consists of all Allowed Unsecured Claims
including ECT's claim arising from the termination of an Option (Corridor)
dated 5/28/99 between MPC and Enron and the Confirmation of an Option
(Collar) dated 11/6/98 between MPC and Enron (the "Enron Swaps").

I would appreciate your help with answering the following questions:

1)  Was a Proof of Claim filed on behalf of ECT and for how much?
2)  Who is the person who will handle filing out and signing the Ballot on
behalf of ECT either rejecting or accepting the Plan
 [which is due to be filed on or before 7/21/00].
3)  If we are not owed any monies by Michael Petroleum, or have not asserted
a claim against Michael Petroleum, then we
 can disregard sending in the ballot on behalf of ECT.

I have copies of all these documents, so if you need me to send you anything,
please let me know.  I appreciate your help with this and please call me if
any of this information is confusing.  Brenda x3-6536


There's something about cycling that brings out the best.....and here's a couple of great examples of the very best.....Ansel Michaels and his valiant, successful attempt to do the distance, and Charles Delacey's desire to help make that journey less painful for Ansel.  I hope you find it in your hearts to salute the efforts of each of them by offering your support.

Charles is a member of Team Enron and was the first rider in to LaGrange this year, arriving 11:15 am.  Please read the following, and if you have questions, his e-mail is Charles.Delacey@enron.com, telephone: 713-853-5757.  THANK YOU!
________________________________________________________________________________________

From:	Delacey, Charles
To:	Team Enron
Subject:	Ansel Michaels/MS150

Ansel Michaels is a 15-year-old freshman at Lamar High School.  Ansel swims on the Lamar swim team and this year, for the first time, joined his swimming teammates on the 2001 MS 150.  Ansel is a paraplegic and rides a hand crank bike in which he is seated and pedals with his arms.  On the first day into LaGrange, Ansel suffered two blowouts and still managed to ride 93 miles before being asked to stop by support crews.  Sunday morning, he was back in the saddle and finished all 72 miles in time to catch the final bus back to Houston.

Ansel pedaled a hand crank bike that was more suited to going around the block than to Austin.  The gears did not work properly and his bike made an extremely difficult task harder than it should have been.  Ansel has limited resources and has already talked about how excited he is about riding in general and the MS150 for next year.  I am asking for donations to help Ansel buy a new bike.  A decent hand crank bike costs aprox. $3,000.  Any donations in excess of the cost of the bike will be contributed to the MS Society.  An account has been established at West University Bank and checks should be payable to Ansel Michaels.  Donations can be sent to:

Ansel Michaels
C/O Charles De Lacey
EB 2051
Enron Corp
1400 Smith Street
Houston, TX 77251-7361

Thanks in advance for your help.


-----Original Message-----
From:  "Business 2.0 Daily Insight"
<business2_lists@newsletters.business2.com>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Business+202+2E0+20Daily+20Insight+22+20+3Cbusiness2+5Fl
ists+40newsletters+2Ebusiness2+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 6:59 AM
To: Jafry, Rahil
Subject: Law in Order

======================================================================
BUSINESS 2.0 DAILY INSIGHT
March 19, 2001
======================================================================

Law in Order

by James Daly

Think someone has to be crazy to launch a pure-play dot-com these days?
Maybe not, depending upon the company and the big guns they have on
board. One such online startup is Legalzoom.com, which draws star power
in the form of co-founder Robert Shapiro, best-known for his position
on the high-profile legal team that got O.J. Simpson off the hook.

Legalzoom.com, which facilitates online legal document preparation,
made its debut at last week's Internet World conference in Los Angeles.
And Shapiro doesn't think they're arriving late to the party. "Not at
all," he exclaimed with an attorney's bluster, while waving around a
chicken leg. "Sure, you've seen some bad companies get hit, but that
doesn't negate the power of a good idea online."

Legalzoom.com is not a law firm, doesn't give legal advice, and
actively refers people with complex legal issues to an attorney.
Instead, they allow you to prepare online a range of legal documents
typically filed with courts and government agencies--from wills and
living trusts to restraining orders, divorces, and prenuptial
agreements--for about one-tenth the cost of what an attorney would
charge. Is that a tacit admission that most lawyers gouge their clients
in fees? "No, it just means that in not very complex matters you can
do it yourself."

"Besides," he added. "Now that all the noise has died down in the
online world we hope to stand out a little more." He's got a point.
The static surrounding the hundreds of dot-com startups has thankfully
diminished, but the very real potential of the Internet remains strong.
The power of a good idea remains eternal. You don't need to go to court
to prove that.

James Daly -- mailto:forwardslash@business2.com -- is Editor in Chief
for Business 2.0.

======================================================================


You have just completed the inventory.  THANK YOU!


Just FYI - this is the kind of stuff I think makes this job so interesting!

---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 12/06/2000 09:27 AM
---------------------------

Tracy Ngo
12/06/2000 09:17 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: northwest power article

---------------------- Forwarded by Tracy Ngo/PDX/ECT on 12/06/2000 09:23 AM
---------------------------

Tracy Ngo
12/06/2000 09:12 AM
To: William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward
Sacks/Corp/Enron@Enron, Wendy Conwell/NA/Enron@ENRON, Veronica
Gonzalez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: northwest power article


YEs, I think so.  If the Ohio utilities agree to defer to the IEEE standards
once they are approved, is that good for us?  What is our view on this?
Thanks

	Tom Hoatson
	11/30/2000 09:58 AM

		 To: Janine Migden/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Jeff Brown/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Kerry
Stroup/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: IEEE Standards For Interconnection

I assume you are referring to the IEEE effort to develop a standard for the
interconnection of distributed resources (IEEE P1547).  I was following this
development but have since reduced my efforts in this area.   The status is
that they are working to get an approved standard released in the 3rd quarter
of 2001.

	Janine Migden
	11/29/2000 04:48 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Brown/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom
Hoatson/NA/Enron@Enron, Kerry Stroup/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: IEEE Standards For Interconnection

Is anyone from Enron involved in the IEEE discussions for uniform standards
for interconnection?


Tom,

I agree that this helps.  We can also put something in to indicate that the
price we sell to them may not be the same price we bought from a third party,
depending on market conditions. Something like that.

Kay

Tom May
05/11/2001 03:41 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Reagan Rorschach/ENRON@enronXgate, Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Fairley/ENRON@enronXgate, Kayne Coulter/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: MDEA Commercial Issues

I think that this will continue to be a very sticky issue for us on all
services deals and I think the following is the way to handle it.

We build into all of these contracts that the counterparty may at any time,
chose to transact directly with a third counterparty.  We would still
administer the contracts and perform the scheduling etc. for them if they
chose to do this.  In this way, the customer may always chose to deal
directly if they chose and we would be doing the scheduling.  I believe that
this will serve to counteract concerns that we will not provide them fair
market prices since they could always chose to deal directly.  We are
confident that our prices are will be competitive and that the counterparty
will chose to transact through us.  We would of course need to protect our
share of the benefit in the case they transact with someone else.

Tom.

Kay Mann
05/11/2001 09:40 AM
To: Reagan Rorschach/ENRON@enronXgate
cc: Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom May/Corp/Enron@Enron, David
Fairley/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject: Re: MDEA Commercial Issues

Another point:

How do we price gas/power we sell to them, especially in light of our duty of
good faith and fair dealing?

Not expecting an answer via email, this is just a topic for further
discussion.

ckm

From: Reagan Rorschach/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/11/2001 09:03 AM
To: Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom May/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kayne
Coulter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Broussard/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kay
Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, David Fairley/ENRON@enronXgate, Jim Homco/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Gerald Gilbert/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: MDEA Commercial Issues

In an effort to get the commercial terms of the contract organized and
papered, we discussed the following issues during yesterday's meeting:

? What will be the contracted process for setting the Bogey?
? What heat rates or heat rate ranges will go in the contract?
? Can we create a schedule to collar the Bogey given a certain gas price?
? Can we get a gas management fee for being the Fuel Manager? (this is a
retrade)
? How does the network service transmission agreement including ancillary
services get accounted for in the "cost" calculation?
? How does Imballance get sorted out at the end of the the month as a profit
or a cost?

Regarding calculation of the Bogey, we have several issues.  First, what is
the methodology?  Rick is very close to having a stack model that
incorporates the business rules including minimum run times, startup costs,
VOM, etc.  Second, what are the daily inputs and who is responsible for
running the model?  This process will need to be documented every time the
calc is performed.  Third, what is the timing of the calc?  We discussed
getting the input info by 2am and doing the calc on a "day ahead" basis.
Only on a select basis would the calc be re-done mid-day.

We are planning on meeting with Marvin next week and working to resolution on
these issues.  This should result in a set of business rules that can be put
into the contract.

Please comment/correct/add/subtract to any or all of the above.  David
Fairley and I will be sending out the Marketing Strategy and Trading and Risk
Policy later this morning.

Thanks,

Reagan


Ray --

FYI.  Some information on how we are talking about the claims in the Bankrupcty case.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"BENNETT YOUNG" <BYOUNG@LLGM.COM>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22BENNETT+20YOUNG+22+20+3CBYOUNG+40LLGM+2ECOM+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, August 30, 2001 8:17 PM
To:	Huddleson, Diann; Sager, Elizabeth; Steffes, James D.; Mellencamp, Lisa; Tribolet, Michael; Williams, Robert C.; Hall, Steve C. (Legal); vsharp@enron.com; Curry, Wanda
Cc:	CARL EKLUND; John Klauberg
Subject:	Attached Files

I enclosed blacklined versions of the riders for the proofs of claim for EES, EEMC and EPMI.  I also enclose the riders for the ECC and ENA claims, which have not changed from the versions circulated last night.

Please let me know your comments as soon as possible.

Ben Young

Bennett G. Young
One Embarcadero Center, Suite 400
San Francisco, California 94111
(415) 951-1167
byoung@llgm.com

==============================================================================
This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is confidential and may be protected by the attorney/client or other privileges.  This e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public information intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If you are not an intended recipient, please delete this e-mail, including attachments, and notify me.  The unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this e-mail, including attachments, is prohibited and may be unlawful.

==============================================================================
 - ridertoE.DOC
 - ridertoE.DOC
 - ridertoE.DOC
 - ridertoE.DOC
 - ridertoE.DOC


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/31/2001
03:44 PM ---------------------------

"Andreas Simou" <andreas.simou@garp.com> on 01/30/2001 08:24:38 AM
To: <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc: <Shirley.Crenshaw@enron.com>
Subject: The GARP Convention: Instructions to Chair

Dear Vince
?
The GARP 2001 Convention is nearly upon us! At this  time, I would like to
send you some information concerning the Convention and  the stream that you
will be Chairing on Tuesday 13th February.
?
When you arrive at the Convention, please make your  way to the Convention
Registration desk, where I will greet you and register you  for the event. I
will then show you to your conference room. As speakers arrive,  I will
introduce them to you.
?
As Chair, you will introduce and sum-up?the  stream.?You will also introduce
individual speakers. Attached are the  biographies of the speakers that will
be presenting during your stream. May I  recommend that you read these in the
meantime and also bring them with you on  the day so as you can introduce the
speakers prior to their presentations. Below  is an outline of the order of
speakers in your stream.
?
I have allocated 40 minutes per session, with five  minutes between sessions
for change around time between speakers. Most speakers  will speak for 30-35
minutes and allow about 10 minutes for Q and A. Should a  speaker?seem like
they are reaching the limits of their time, the Chair  will bring this
to?their attention prior to the last?5 minutes  allocated to them.?It is also
the role of the Chair to?ask the  delegates for questions, asking each
questioner?for their name and the  organisation they represent. Should
delegates be a little slow on?the Q and  A take-up, often the Chair will have
some thought-provoking questions to put  forward. I shall ensure that there
are GARP people in the room with microphones  to hand to delegates with a
question.
?
There may be occasion for the Chair  to?announce some housekeeping on behalf
of GARP.
?
If you have any questions?please do not  hesitate to contact me, otherwise I
look forward to meeting you in a couple of  weeks.
?
Kind regards
?
Andreas?

?

TRACK ) 4 ENERGY  RISK

Measuring Energy Risk )  Tackling Price Volatility, Adapting VaR, Scenario
Modeling and Regulatory  Requirements

Vince Kaminski, Enron  NA

Energy Credit Risk  Management

Baxter Gillette, Ameren  Energy

The Volatility Challenge:  Efficient Modelling of Price Volatility for  Energy

Spyros Maragos, Dynegy  Inc.

Lunch

TRACK ) 4 CORPORATE RISK

Modeling Corporate Risk at  Ford ) Risk Management from a Shareholder Value
Perspective

Freeman Wood, Ford Motor  Company

Enhancing Shareholder Value  through Alternative Risk Transfer ) A
Manufacturer,s  Perspective

Ash Srivastava, Bombardier  Inc.

Coffee  Break

All Bets are On: Enterprise  Risk Management 2001

James Lam,  Erisk

Understanding the Scope of  Reputational Risk Events ) Whether Prevention is
Possible, Risk Indicators  and Establishing a Risk-Conscious Culture

Peter Schofield, American  Express

_____________________________
Andreas Simou
GARP, Conference  Director
Tel? +44 (0)20 7626 9301
Fax +44 (0)20 7626  9900
andreas.simou@garp.com
?
Don't miss the GARP 2001 Convention,
program details via  our web site
www.garp.com
 - Gillette-bio.doc
 - Wood-bio.doc
 - Srivastava-Bio.doc
 - Lam-bio.doc
 - Schofield-bio.doc


Not too good.  Hard to tell right now wether its short term or long term.  We
will have  a better fill for it in about 3 or 4 days.

"Veselack, Joni" <Joni.Veselack@gen.pge.com> on 07/25/2000 11:49:15 AM
To: "'Chris.Germany@enron.com'" <Chris.Germany@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: FW: Enron Press Release

How is Dad???

I'll be here definetly this week and next week. Not sure about the second
week of August... maybe that Monday... still trying to get time off to look
over the area.

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris.Germany@enron.com [mailto:Chris.Germany@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2000 11:40 AM
To: Joni.Veselack@gen.pge.com
Subject: Re: FW: Enron Press Release

Hey woman!  When do you go north?  I'm looking at taking you out for a free
meal the second week of Augy.  I off next week and you know where I'll be.

PG&E National Energy Group and any other
company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or
logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, the regulated California utility.  Neither
PG&E National Energy Group nor these other
referenced companies are regulated by the California Public
Utilities Commission.  Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
do not have to buy products from these companies in order
to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.


Father's Day is June 17th.  Don't forget Dad on his special day!  Send the perfect gift from FTD.COM
and get $10 OFF when you order from this email.
http://www.ftd.com/discountb

Show Dad you're thinking of him with the FTD Especially for Dad Bouquet.  Click here and get $10 OFF:
http://www.ftd.com/discountb/cgis/get_page.cgi?product_id=A26-F2&type=product&external=3914

Indulge Dad's favorite pastime with our specially designed Golf Bouquet - including all the essentials
he needs for the season.  Click here and get $10 OFF:
http://www.ftd.com/discountb/cgis/get_page.cgi?product_id=9250&type=product&external=3914

Satisfy Dad's sweet tooth with our delicious assortment of treats in Miss Grace's Gift Tin.
Click here and get $10 OFF:
http://www.ftd.com/discountb/cgis/get_page.cgi?product_id=X058&type=product&external=3914

Or choose from our Father's Day Collection of specially selected floral arrangements and gifts.
Click here to order and get $10 OFF:
http://www.ftd.com/discountb/cgis/get_page.cgi?type=index&index_id=occasion_fathersday&external=3914

The FTD.COM Hole in One Sweepstakes!
Whether you're a golf pro or just starting out, you'll love this golf getaway package which includes
deluxe accommodations at the Pointe Hilton Tapatio Cliffs Resort in Phoenix AZ, two rounds of golf and
a gift certificate to relax at the Tocaloma Spa & Salon. Or you could win other great prizes. Go to
http://www.ftd.com/discountb and look under "Just Inside" for all the details.

Happy Father's Day!

P.S.  If you do not wish to receive FTD.COM's exclusive email offers and updates please click here:
http://www.ftd.com/cgis/get_page.cgi?type=newsletter_unsubscribe
Due to timing issues, you may potentially receive one or two future messages before your unsubscribe request
is implemented. For unrelated questions or requests, please contact us at
http://custserv.ftd.com
If these links do not work for you, please visit us at http://www.ftd.com/discountb

Promotion does not apply to Disney products and cannot be combined with any other offers or discounts.

(c) 2001 FTD.COM, Inc


Mo (moshuffle@hotmail.com) has sent you a news article
Personal message:
Yahoo - Rockies seen as key to U.S. natural gas growthhttp://biz.yahoo.com/rf/011025/l17336052_1.html

Yahoo - Rockies seen as key to U.S. natural gas growth
Finance Home Yahoo! - Help
[ Latest Headlines  | Market Overview  | News Alerts  ]

   Related Quotes EPG  P  WMB 49.36 56.10 27.02+1.53 +0.38 +1.12 delayed 20 mins - disclaimer  Quote Data provided by Reuters

Thursday October 25, 3:56 am Eastern Time
Rockies seen as key to U.S. natural gas growth
By Andrew Kelly
HOUSTON, Oct 25 (Reuters) - As U.S. natural gas production declines in traditional strongholds such as Texas and the Gulf of Mexico, the Rocky Mountains are widely viewed as the best bet for boosting domestic supplies to meet rising demand for gas.

The Rockies have loomed large in several recent U.S. energy industry acquisitions as companies bet that they will be able to overcome technical obstacles and environmental opposition to unlock the region's rich reserve potential.
``Most of the supply growth in the United States has been disappointing, but we've seen extremely strong growth in the Rockies,'' said Jennifer Snyder, Director of North American Natural Gas at Cambridge Energy Research Associates (CERA).
The Rockies could contain over 300 trillion cubic feet of recoverable reserves, or almost one quarter of all onshore and offshore reserves in the lower 48 states, according to a report by the National Petroleum Council.
However, not everybody wants to tap that hydrocarbon wealth. The Montana Wilderness Organization, for example, is campaigning to keep the Rocky Mountain Front -- recognized as an important wildlife habitat -- closed to oil and gas drilling.
``This is one of America's national treasures and one of our greatest conservation stories. To try to undo that for a small amount of natural gas doesn't make a lot of sense,'' said Mark Good, a field organizer with the association.
POWER GENERATION DRIVES GROWTH
U.S. gas consumption rose five percent to 22.8 trillion cubic feet in 2000 and despite current concerns about the weak economy, further growth is forecast in the long term, driven largely by increased use of the clean-burning fuel to generate electricity.
Until quite recently there was scant interest in Rockies gas because it was tough to get at, prices were low and there were not enough pipelines to take the gas to market, according to Fred Meissner, a petroleum geologist at the Colorado School of Mines.
But that has changed as the environmental benefits of gas and the development of efficient new combined-cycle gas turbines have spurred increased use of the fuel for power generation.
The lack of pipeline capacity in the Rockies has also eased as big companies such as Williams Cos. (NYSE:WMB - news) and El Paso Corp. (NYSE:EPG - news) have committed themselves to expansion projects.
Phillips Petroleum Co.(NYSE:P - news) gained a foothold in the Rockies by buying gas assets in Wyoming's Powder River Basin last year.
``If you look at total U.S. production to reserves, it's a decline story, but it's exactly the opposite in the Rockies,'' said Don Wallette, Phillips' regional director in the Rockies.
Rocky Mountain gas was also a key driver behind Kerr-McGee Corp's (NYSE:KMG - news) recent acquisition of HS Resources.
Oil giant Royal Dutch/Shell quote from Yahoo! UK & Ireland: SHEL.L) launched a hostile takeover bid for Rockies gas producer Barrett Resources this year, but was thwarted when its offer topped by Williams Cos.
TAPPING ``UNCONVENTIONAL'' GAS
Interest in the Rockies has been spurred in part by technologies that allow ``unconventional'' gas resources, such as coalbed methane, to be exploited economically.
Coal can hold several times as much gas as the rock in conventional reservoirs and it can be extracted by drilling relatively shallow wells into the coal seam, then releasing the gas by pumping out large volumes of water.
First seen on a meaningful scale in the San Juan basin of New Mexico and Colorado in the 1980s, coal bed methane development has spread in recent years to the Raton basin in Colorado and the Green River and Powder River basins in Wyoming.
``The beauty of coalbed methane is that you don't have to discover it, so you eliminate a lot of the traditional risk. It isn't very expensive, compared to setting up an exploration effort offshore,'' said Wallette of Phillips Petroleum.
Coalbed methane draws considerably less enthusiasm from environmentalists who are concerned by the Bush administration's plans to open more federal land in the Rockies to drilling.
Pollution problems associated with the disposal of saline water, released as a byproduct of coalbed methane production have led to protests in some Rockies communities.
Another unconventional resource that can be tapped in the Rockies is ``tight gas'', found deep below the earth's surface in low permeability sandstone that restricts the flow of the gas.
``A few years ago people became aware that there is a lot of gas in these very tight Cretaceous sands but the economics were minimal because you couldn't get it out economically. Hydraulic fracturing turned that around,'' said Professor Meissner.
Fracturing involves injecting a fluid into a rock formation, causing it to crack and making it easier for the gas to flow.
Phillips is mainly focusing on coalbed methane in the Rockies but has drilled some tight gas wells in Utah, said Wallette.
Email this story  - Most-emailed articles  - Most-viewed articles

More Quotes and News:	 El Paso Corp (NYSE:EPG  - news ) Phillips Petroleum Co (NYSE:P  - news ) The Williams Companies Inc (NYSE:WMB  - news )
	Related News Categories: oil/energy , US Market News , utilities

Help
Copyright ? 2001 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy - Terms of Service
Copyright ? 2001 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Questions or Comments?


At some point when you less busy, I would like you to look into one of the
Compressor service deals.


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Mtg. w/Mike Bodnar over update on transitions

Date:		2/9/2001
Time:		11:00 AM - 12:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


<http://www.josbank.com>
  <http://www.clickaction.net/partner/josabank/ads/101501/jab10142001products.gif>	  <http://www.clickaction.net/partner/josabank/ads/101501/jab10142001pict.jpg>
Valid Online Only (does not include prior purchases). Offer Expires Thursday October 25, 2001

Click here to change or remove your subscription. <http://specials.josbank.com/Change-Remove/a10049a92913525a1a44062>   <http://specials.josbank.com/Sense-HTML/a10049a92913525a44062>

CLICK HERE TO FORWARD TO FRIENDS AND FAMILY! <http://www.you-click.net/GoForward/a10049a44062aSa92913525a1>


Dan, since you are the guru of these unwindings and whether there are others
which need to be unwound I am forwarding this to you.  Dan, also please let
me know what Ducote has accomplished with Entex
Sandi, I am sending this to you for Data Room background knowledge.
Thanks bng- ---- Forwarded by Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT on 08/31/2000 06:13 PM
-----

	Anne C Koehler
	08/31/2000 05:47 PM

		 To: Dkeyes@velaw.com, dtomek@velaw.com, chriscollins@velaw.com,
gweatherby@velaw.com
		 cc: Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Project Triple Lutz

I wanted to update each of you on a number of matters:

1.  On Tuesday of next week we plan to give copies of the Proposed Stock
Purchase Agreement and Lease (sublease) to the interested bidders.  The first
data room visits are scheduled to occur on Thursday the seventh.   Chris is
going to circulate a revised draft of the Stock Purchase Agreement to
everyone later today and everyone on the Enron team should have their
comments to me by Friday evening.

2.  With respect to the lease, in response to David's inquiry regarding
section 3.06, I think we should leave in all the parts of 3.06.  With respect
to subpart (v) would it be possible to leave it in but just handle the issue
of title etc as a rep.  Also, I would like to add a change of control
provision to the Lease and provide for a parent guarantee from an entity with
a credit rating acceptable to Enron.  I have yet to receive AnnMarie's
comments and questions, but I think you should go ahead and generate a new
draft for distribution Friday and AnnMarie will have the opportunity to
comment on the revised draft.  I would ask that the revised lease be reviewed
by Trina Chandler and Ed Osterberg as well.  Gail, please give me a call and
we can coordinate getting the revised draft lease to the appropriate
parties.

3. With respect to the unwind descriptions and the right to use agreement, I
would appreciate an update and an estimate on when the unwind descriptions
and a draft of the exclusive Right to Use agreement would be available.

4.  We have now been informed by the accounting gurus that  we can go ahead
and transfer the Entex contract to the purchaser of HPL and not have to undo
the marked to market position.  As a result, we will transfer the Entex
contract as well as the other contracts which cannot be in HPL to a new Enron
and sell the stock in the new sub along with the HPL stock.  There will be no
need for  a back to back contract.  However, we will need to unwind the cash
monetization transactions involving the Entex contract, as well as the one
involving the Union Carbide contract. (there may be others and we are
checking on them now.)

That is all for now.  I will keep you posted as things develop (and change!).

Anne C. Koehler
Sr. Counsel, ENA
EB 3832
713-853-3448


Have been talking to credit.  First set of 24 or so counterparties should be
coming any moment now.  Second set is being worked on.

From: Karen Lambert on 10/25/2000 04:46 PM
To: Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Adnan Patel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary G
Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EOL Steel Launch

Do we have any input from credit on approvals for steel counterparties ?

---------------------- Forwarded by Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT on 10/25/2000 04:44
PM ---------------------------

From:  Lisa Lees
10/23/2000 01:18 PM

To: Bradley Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: EOL Steel Launch

EOL is launching steel on Monday, October 30.

Product types are:

US Steel Hot Rolled Fin Swap
US Steel Cold Rolled Fin Swap
US Steel Hot-Dipped Galvanized Fin Swap

Enron Entity:  Enron North America Corp.

Deadline:  Need approvals from Credit by Thursday morning, October 26 and
Contracts and Legal by Friday afternoon, October 27.

The attached excel spreadsheet contains the targeted customer list.  Please
note that there are 4 worksheet tabs.

I know this is short notice, but as you can see below, we just received the
list today.

Thank you.

Lisa
---------------------- Forwarded by Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT on 10/23/2000 01:06 PM
---------------------------

Rahul Seksaria @ ENRON

10/23/2000 12:58 PM
To: Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: EOL shortened list for credit

---------------------- Forwarded by Rahul Seksaria/Corp/Enron on 10/23/2000
12:57 PM ---------------------------

Rahul Seksaria

10/23/2000 09:33 AM
To: Naveed Ahmed/NA/Enron@Enron, Carl Carter/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Kevin O'Donnell/NA/Enron@Enron, Greg Hermans/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sean
Keenan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim Stanley/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: EOL shortened list for credit

Attached is a list of 123 counterparties we want preapproved by credit.
Please call me if you have any questions.

Regards
Rahul


Hi, Mary -

Just got an e-mail that you are leaving ENRON.  I hope this doesn't mean
you're leaving the energy business.   It's always been a pleasure working
with you.

I send you all best wishes for wherever you're headed.

Warm regards,

- Bud


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/15/2000 05:55
PM ---------------------------

Christi L Nicolay@ECT
06/15/2000 05:41 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ozzie
Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey M Keenan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: VEPCO PPA

Several thoughts from federal reg./transmission side:
I haven't worked with a VEPCO interconnection agreement yet, but many times
there are requirements that the generator is required to provide emergency
power to the interconnected transmission provider, in which case you would
want the interconnection agreement to cover all costs you would incur to
replace the energy at a different location (usually it is difficult to get
this agreement, so you should check and then factor that into the equation).
I would be happy to look at the interconnection agreement with you.
Interconnection of generation is a separate process from requesting
transmission.  It appears that VEPCO has to buy the transmission (or use its
network transmission) when the Delivery Point is the plant.  Enron will have
to purchase transmission on VEPCO if it is selling to third parties off the
plant and will have to purchase transmission on other systems if it wants to
supply at an alternate delivery point.  Please discuss this with Kevin
Presto's tranmission people (Bill Rust on 31).  Enron cannot use VEPCO's
network transmission to delivery to third parties.
Is this plant in the VEPCO queue yet?  Also, FERC has issued some recent
rulings that deal with time limits on system impact studies, etc.  While
VEPCO is probably incentivized to get this built, you want to make sure that
you do not lose optionality in selling to third parties from the plant due to
transmission constraints.  A request for transmission on OASIS is the only
way to ensure deliverability to third parties.
3.5 (c) Intra-day scheduling--You may have hourly transmission risk for an
increase.  Unless you buy longer term firm, you will deliver from other
sources using hourly non-firm, which is the lowest priority of transmission
and subject to getting cut.  You may want to consider doing this on
best/reasonable efforts basis.  (Also, even if you purchase
daily/monthly/yearly firm to serve third parties, if you change the point of
receipt or point of delivery temporarily, your request is treated as
non-firm.)
12.4--Currently VEPCO is interested in joining the Alliance ISO (an RTO that
has not been approved by FERC yet--competing ISO to Midwest ISO), but since
FERC has not approved any RTO for VEPCO yet, there could be significant
changes in the transmission charges/methods of obtaining
transmission/grandfathering of current transmission, etc during this
contract.  Make sure with the ENA attorneys that this out/increase in price
covers that circumstance.
Underlying tranmission rates on VEPCO or any other provider can change at
most any time, subject to the provider filing a rate case.  Therefore, any
current transmission rates shown on OASIS are not necessarily what you will
pay over the term of any transmission that Enron may purchase to serve this
contract.  Generally, transmission providers will not agree to fixed rates.

Tom Chapman
06/13/2000 06:07 PM
To: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: VEPCO PPA

Christi--

This is the note that I received on Tuesday June 13.  This is a relatively
early draft of the PPA.

I think that we still have to purchase the land associated with the sites and
do the due diligence on the site with regards to some of the siting issues.
IN addition, in NC we are going to get a CPCN to site the plant to speed up
the regulatory process in the NCUC.  I think that this will make the issue
less contentious because of the NCUC's acceptance of the Dynegy plant at
Rockingham that had a PPA with Duke Power.

Using the Dynegy plant as a guideline, their only stumbling block was their
gas agreeement.  They built a bypass off Transco.  We would be taking gas
from the LDC of Rocky Mount.  Having talked with the regulatory folks at the
NCUC who handle gas issues, this is the preferred route.  So, I do not think
that we have any major state issues.  I think that right now we are simply
working on some of the siting issues.

That being said, I will let you take a look at the PPA and let me know or
Jeff Keenan (or even Heather Kroll or Ozzie Pagan) if you think that there
are some transmission issues or other issues on the federal level.

Thanks.

Tom
---------------------- Forwarded by Tom Chapman/HOU/ECT on 06/13/2000 06:04
PM ---------------------------

Linda J Simmons
06/13/2000 08:45 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ozzie
Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey M Keenan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: VEPCO PPA

----- Forwarded by Linda J Simmons/HOU/ECT on 06/13/2000 08:44 AM -----

	"Nancy Wodka" <nwodka@bracepatt.com>
	06/12/2000 04:20 PM

		 To: <linda.j.simmons@enron.com>, <lisa.mellencamp@enron.com>
		 cc: "William Frederking" <wfrederking@bracepatt.com>
		 Subject: VEPCO PPA

Lisa:  Attached is a draft of the Power Purchase Agreement with VEPCO, based
on the current version of the term sheet.  In preparing the draft, we did
encounter several additional questions for Enron's consideration.  These are
noted with brackets and, in some cases, italicized notes, in the draft and
are also highlighted below.  You may want to address these issues before this
goes to VEPCO.

Cover and first page-- Should the party to the agreement (for the moment) be
ENA or a special purpose company?

Definitions--  We included a defined term "Emergency Start-Up" (a start up or
increase in energy scheduled during a day) and a place in Exhibit A to
include a price for this, although this was not covered in the term sheet.

Section 2.2--  We included a provision for VEPCO to take test energy (energy
charge only; no demand charge)--do you want this?

Section 2.3--  This was taken from the term sheet, but is it correct that COD
will be July 1 (since the demand charge is supposed to start June 1?)  Also,
it would be best to define "commencement of construction" to avoid
controversy down the road.  We could either do this now or put in a
placeholder that indicates it needs to be defined or be silent, whichever is
your preference.  Also, bear in mind that we have not included a specific
remedy (e.g., liquidated damages) if the Seller does not achieve that
milestone on time.  Under the default provision (Section 8.1(c)), there would
be a 30 day period to cure before Buyer could terminate (extendible to 90
days if a longer period of time is needed and Seller diligently pursues the
cure).  Would you prefer the right to pay ld's and extend the time period?

Section 3.1(b)--  Should the 1400 hour limitation apply to all sales under
this PPA or only sales from the Facility?  I.e., would you use this Agreement
to sell to VEPCO power in addition to what would be available from the
Facility?  Also, is this a calendar year limitation--i.e., could they take
1400 hours in the period June-Dec. 2001 or does the 1400 hours need to be
pro-rated for the first year?

Section 3.4-- Since this is not a base load plant, the normal definition of
Availability as the number of hours in a year of operations compared to the
total hours in the year would not seem to be applicable.  Instead, we stated
that the Facility would be capable of being available 92% of the year (other
than due to Force Majeure and 336 hours (2 weeks) of scheduled
maintenance)--i.e., that if they tried to schedule it, it is expected to be
available.  Is that what Enron intended?  Additionally, the term sheet stated
that a remedy for failure to meet Availability would need to be agreed--why
wouldn't cost of cover damages be appropriate? Also, please note that we
included language stating that Seller will not perform maintenance during
peak periods.

Section 3.5(b)-- Please note the bracketed language re taking Blocks of
Energy.  We have 50 MW minimum blocks but the capacity is 223--should we
allow the last Block to be 23 if they've scheduled all the rest?

Section 3.5(c)-- Please see the bracketed language at the end of this Section.

Section 4.7-- Should there a required minimum take of Energy?

Article 6-- The Genco/Santee Cooper form of PPA we used as a model did not
have any provisions on metering.  (See placeholder note in Article 6.)  Do
you want to add such a provision, ignore it or just include a placeholder for
now?

Section 9.1-- Is 30 days from invoice correct for the payment due date or
would you prefer a shorter period?

Article 15-- The Genco/Santee Cooper form had mediation as a required step
prior to arbitration.  Should we keep that?  Also, the form of arbitration is
"baseball" arbitration--i.e.,  the arbitrators have to chose one party's
position or the other's.  Is that what you want?

Section 16.2--  We used New York for governing law, on the premise that it
will be difficult to get VEPCO to agree to Texas law and we would not
recommend Virginia law for this contract.

Exhibit A-- There are a number of questions on the pricing exhibit--please
see the bracketed notes therein.

Please call and let us know how you would like to proceed on this draft.

 - VEPPPA.DOC


JULY 14                TECO TAP         10.000/ ENRON        60.000/ HPL IFERC
                               LS HPL KATY      30.000/ ENRON

JULY 15                  TECO TAP       10.000/ENRON          95.000/ HPL
IFERC
                                 LS HPL KATY     30.000/ENRON

JULY 16                  TECO TAP        10.000/ENRON             55.000/ HPL
IFERC
                                   LS HPL KATY   30.000/ENRON


Jacques,

Can you draft the partnership agreement and the construction contract?

The key business points are:

1.  Investment is a loan with prime + 1% rate

2.  Construction contract is cost plus $1.4 Million

3.  The investors' loan is repaid before any construction profit is paid.

4.  All parties are GP's but 3 out 4 votes needed for major decisions?

5.  60/40 split favoring the investors.

With regard to the construction contract, we are concerned about getting a
solid line by line cost estimate and clearly defining what constitutes
costs.  Then we need a mechanism to track the actual expenses.  Keith and I
would like to oversee the bookkeeping.  The builders would be requred to fax
all invoices within 48 hours.  We also would want online access to the
checking account of the partnership so we could see if checks were clearing
but invoices were not being submitted.

Let me know if you can draft these agreements.  The GP issue may need some
tweaking.

Phillip Allen
713-853-7041
pallen@enron.com


Rick:

As you know, Clinton should sign, over the next couple of days, legislation
on electronic signatures.  There is a big need to standardize the approach
with respect to e-signatures on trading contracts and maybe confirmations.  I
think this is an area that ISDA could provide leadership and possibly make
money through a protocol.  Let me know what you think.

Mark


Debra & Dan -

Attached is a worksheet for a new Master Firm Purchase/Sale agreement, with
Public Utility District No. 1 of Clark County.

Dave Fuller in the Portland office is working on a long-term gas supply deal
with this counterparty, with a total value of $500 million.  We need to get a
draft agreement to him ASAP.  Please make every effort to get this out at the
absolute early possible opportunity!!!

Sorry for the rush, but thanks in advance for your assistance,

Jay


I must know why your roommates are so scary! Mine - well, that's just
obvious. Oh, and since we last e-mailed, Molly has gone out and landed
herself a full-fledged boyfriend. Anything to avoid getting a job. He's a
"natural healer" and he's also had "an experience with Jesus," so this one
should be REALLY interesting. Amber and I had a few drinks last night and
basically pretended like nothing happened - it's easier that way. We both
know there's no real friendship to salvage, so keeping it strictly in the
bars is the smartest thing to do. And Anna, don't think for a minute that my
description of life in Portland is exciting or cultured or romantic, cause
it's pretty much the polar opposite of all those things. I've been so tired
this week that I've been spouting out sentences like "The red computer needs
to climb my shoelaces and the people riding the dinosaurs are wrong." It's
definitely been interesting. I'm on my way to sushi with a few people right
now, but of course I can see my reflection in my forehead and my hair looks
like a sad, sad, small animal. Super! Maybe I'll meet the man of my dreams.
I'll tell you, Anna - I know you've got scary clashing dresser man, but
sometimes from the single person's point of view, that doesn't look so bad.
Hang in there - and call me soon!

Love,
Kate
503-288-6546

Anna Symes <annas@cobs.edu> on 02/23/2001 04:08:25 PM
To: "'Kate.Symes@enron.com'" <Kate.Symes@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:

Hey buttface!

Wow - it actually sounds like your roommate problems may be comparable to
mine (except that you probably don't fear for your life quite as much).  Who
is paying for Amber to come to Denver?  It sounds like she might be a little
out of her mind right now, but at least she's not going back to Chris just
yet.  So are you going to Seattle this weekend?  That sounds so fun!  I am
so jealous - parties, dinners, wine, men.  You and I are NOT living the same
life right now.  I am in the process of trying to break things off with the
ugly dresser, which was proving to be difficult until last night, when I
made the mistake of letting him come to a movie with Michelle and I.  Kate,
I was scared.  It was dark and I was surrounded by the two most psycho
people I know.  Josh talked through the whole thing and laughed at
inappropriate moments and tried to hold my hand at one point.  It was
excruciating!  It made Michelle look almost normal.

Not much else going on.  I'll call you this weekend, okay?  We need to dish.

Luego,
Anna

-----Original Message-----
From: Kate.Symes@enron.com [mailto:Kate.Symes@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 11:43 AM
To: annas@cobs.edu
Subject: Re: Rockin in the Rockies, bro

So didya hear the Blazers creamed the Nuggets last night? I always knew the
Pacific Northwest would dominate in sports - they're not battling with that
ol' Rocky Mountain High if ya know what I mean.

Well I'm sorry I didn't get back to you yesterday - work was hectic and I
knew that if I started an e-mail to you it would either be half-assed or
I'd never finish it. Well, I'm going for the former now, because I realized
there would never be a good time to divulge the full and sordid details of
what's happening around here, and all the while I wait, more and more
important nuggets (get it!) of gossip are accumulating.

So it's quite appropriate that you wrote yesterday with roommate issues -
mine could not be worse. Amber took off for the "library" on Thursday night
and came home.....four days later. After Molly and I had a mild freak-out
session on Friday - which included calling everybody she's every known,
including Chris and the police - we heard through the grapevine that Marky
McCulloch, of Neidermeyer cousin fame, was in town from none other than
Denver and the two were having a secret and James-Bond-like rendezvous at
the beach. Well that was all well and fine, other than the fact that she
DIDN'T TELL US SHE WAS LEAVING and we had been planning a housewarming
party this weekend for the past month and she DIDN'T TELL US SHE WAS
LEAVING and she moved kitty into the house but still hasn't told our
landlords or paid the $500 deposit, oh, and also, SHE DIDN'T TELL US SHE
WAS LEAVING. So many things were wrong and bizarre about that, but none
more than her attitude when she walked in the door Monday afternoon. Let's
just say I spared no lung muscles in telling her exactly what I thought
about her selfish, childish, idiotic, and most importantly, psychotically
self-important behavior. She had the gall to defensively scream back that
she didn't tell us BECAUSE SHE DIDN'T WANT TO LIE. Hmmmm. Not only did she
not want to lie - how sweet - but she couldn't have told us because Molly
and I have suddenly developed an insatiable urge to spread fervent and
widespread rumors about Amber's love trysts. Now, I KNOW there's nothing
I'd rather be doing.

Anyway, enough of that. She and I have reached an understanding that just
because we're roommates does not mean we have to be friends. We've never
been good at that anyhow. In other news, we had an amazing housewarming
party. I really wish you could have been there. Molly and I didn't know 90
percent of the people there, which is a good thing because it meant they
were all interesting, successful, gracious and cute. I think there were
about four girls there - you could tell who planned the party. Sadly, no
love connections were made that evening, but I've decided that's my new
M.O. - keep 'em guessing. My friend Michael from Maui who now lives in
Seattle came down with his friend Jordan who happens to be hot and writing
an article for Food & Wine magazine. Very interesting guy, but potentially
in the closet, so I'm keeping my distance. But they invited me up to
Seattle next weekend for a five-course meal and $100 bottles of wine at
some Microsoft dude's mansion. Definitely sounds like my crowd. Should I
wear my dirty jeans or my clean jeans?

I've got my eye on flights to Denver, but right now it's looking like the
end of March before I can scrape up that kind of cash. Amber on the other
hand will be there five times before that because some psycho over there
keeps buying her tickets. That's fair for ya.

Okay, that's all I can do for now, but call me tonight and we'll do the
rumor mill justice. Take care and hang in there - we'll be booting a
roommate soon if you feel like coming back to Portland.

Kate
503-288-6546


We have made the  following modifications to the EnronOnline applications.

Stack Manager Changes

Fill Order Enhancements - (Effective Tuesday September 25)
?	To fill a Top of Stack order in Stack Manager, Right click on the pink shaded order in the depth window of Stack Manager and select fill.
?	The trader now has the ability to fill limit orders that appear at the top of the trader's stack on both sides.
?	The order will now be filled at the full order volume regardless of the trader's stack volume.
?	Filling an order will not move the trader's price or cause a hedge to occur.

Resize floated stack windows- (Effective Tuesday September 25)

You will now have the ability to resize the stack window to the desired extent.

Website Changes ( Effective Monday September 24)

Limit Order Restrictions on Physical Transactions -
?	Customers will not be allowed to transact with themselves on physical transactions. If a top of stack limit order has been placed on a physical product the counterparty or desk that placed the order will not be allowed to transact on it.
?	If a customer or desk has top of stack limit orders at different prices on both the bid and offer and subsequently moves the price of one so that they are at the same price, both orders will be cancelled. The customer would have effectively transacted with himself.

Please call me if you have any questions. Thanks.

Savita ( X 31787)


Teco Tap       60.000 / Enron


Hey Tyson.  Are you guys doing anything after the game?  I think Ben Pacewic,
Jeff Burns, Kevin Stangeland, Chris Hartman, Rueben Schug and some other guys
are coming down and staying the night but i don't think we will have time to
stop by before the game.  I know I would like to come by the house and see
how things are doing and I am sure those guys would to so let me know if you
guys have anything going on Saturday night.

YITB

GUZ


David,

Another trip in the cards. You can catch me at the office on wed
or next week at home.

Vince

"Walkup, David C (HOUSTONAS AS 582)" <dwalkup@pclient.ml.com> on 04/03/2000
03:43:31 PM
To: "'Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: Hello

I am tentatively planning on being in The Woodlands Wednesday.  Should I
stop by the house that night or do we need to get together tomorrow or
Wednesday morning?
David C. Walkup
Financial Consultant
713-658-1685
800-456-9712

> ----------
> From:  Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com[SMTP:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
> Sent:  Monday, April 03, 2000 4:35 PM
> To:  dwalkup@pclient.ml.com
> Subject:  Re: Hello
>
>
> David,
>
> Can you stop by on Wednesday?
>
> I shall be gone for a few days after this day.
>
> Vince
>
>
>
>
>
> "Walkup, David C (HOUSTONAS AS 582)" <dwalkup@pclient.ml.com> on
> 04/03/2000
> 01:21:45 PM
>
> To:   "'Vincent Kaminski'" <vkamins@enron.com>
> cc:
> Subject:  Hello
>
>
> Hello, Vince.
>
> I guess you are still traveling a lot.  I just wanted to say hello and see
> when we can get together and look at getting some more money deposited
> into
> the CMA for future investments.
>
> Get back with me when you can.
> David C. Walkup
> Financial Consultant
> 713-658-1685
> 800-456-9712
> ____________________________________________________________
>
>
>
>
> CAUTION: Electronic mail sent through the Internet is not secure and could
> be intercepted by a third party.  For your protection, avoid sending
> identifying information, such as account, Social Security or card numbers
> to
> us or others.  Further, do not send time-sensitive, action-oriented
> messages, such as transaction orders, fund transfer instructions, or check
> stop payments, as it is our policy not to accept such items electronicall
>
>
>
>
>
>
____________________________________________________________

CAUTION: Electronic mail sent through the Internet is not secure and could
be intercepted by a third party.  For your protection, avoid sending
identifying information, such as account, Social Security or card numbers to
us or others.  Further, do not send time-sensitive, action-oriented
messages, such as transaction orders, fund transfer instructions, or check
stop payments, as it is our policy not to accept such items electronicall


Just in case you missed the article regarding PSEG's plans to build new transmission line into NYC.  See the link below.

Don

http://biz.yahoo.com/rf/011011/n11310842_1.html


Here is the Friday party info.  Should be fun.

---------------------- Forwarded by Ted Noble/HOU/ECT on 07/27/2000 12:30 PM
---------------------------
From: Billy Braddock@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS on 07/26/2000 03:06 PM
To: Palmer Letzerich/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Paul
Burkhart/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Esben Pedersen/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Nathan Will/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Bryan Williams/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Ross Mesquita/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Ann Korioth/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Ted Noble/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Massey/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Mitchell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sean Keenan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bret
Scholtes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John Van Gelder/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Richard Schneider/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
cc:
Subject: Alternative to a .com luau

Party this Friday.  See below.
----- Forwarded by Billy Braddock/Enron Communications on 07/26/00 03:06 PM
-----

	Corbin Barnes
	07/26/00 12:42 PM

		 To: Frank Vela/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Jim Emerson/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Jason Thompkins/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Key Kasravi/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Radu Tutos/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Billy
Braddock/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Joseph Escobar/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Anand David/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, David Reinfeld/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Ashley Dietz/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, John
Allario/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nate Alvord/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Carlos Vicens/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Lucy Tanner/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Brett Schulick/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Cecilia Manzolillo/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Paul Burkhart/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Bryan Williams/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, chris_cassell@hotmail.com,
rrenner@hdrinc.com, troy_martin@usa.net, BMHBrad@aol.com, Bryan.Dehan@msdw.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Alternative to a .com luau

Gente - Being the key contact people that i know all of you are - i am sure
that this invite will find its way to the appropriate people.  Feel free to
invite all that you think would enjoy - It is clearly not our intention to
belittle or ignore in any way the important personal triumphs of those not on
these initial email lists.

See you there.
Corbin

Date:
Wed, 26 Jul 2000 11:30:55 -0500
From:
Bryan Dehan <Bryan.Dehan@msdw.com>??|?Block address
Reply-to:
Bryan.Dehan@msdw.com
Organization:
Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co.
To:
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Friday Party
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 11:30:55 -0500
To: "Dehan, Bryan" <Bryan.Dehan@msdw.com>
BCC: gdehan@nichesw.com, agoldberg@compubank.com, jessica_Jacobe@ars.aon.com,
Billy_Braddock@enron.net,MERRITT@SUPLEEART.COM, Chiprives@aol.com,
elawhon@mdck.com,dollingerd@epenergy.com, rkeisler@flash.net, lklaus@pdq.net,
halejulie@yahoo.com,
SKayem7800@aol.com,Trey.willerson@chase.com,
Christopher.Thomas@Bus.utexas.edu, elizabethmccord@hotmail.com,
loren@capitalcommercial.com,"(E-mail), Matt Turner"
<MTURNER@LPCommercial.com>,"Allen, Margaret"
<Margaret.Allen@enron.com>,"Barnes, Corbin"
<corbin_barnes@yahoo.com>,"Dawn, Lawrence,"
<DLawrence@cei-crescent.com>,"Eller, Dirk" <deller@Agillion.com>,"Ford,
Aimee" <forda@tklaw.com>, "Ford, Bo" <bford@frostbank.com>,"Graber,
Courtney" <Courtney_Graber@Dell.com>,"Hamilton, Chad"
<Chad_Hamilton@Dell.com>,"HOGAN, WYATT"
<HOGAW@andrews-kurth.com>,"Hudgins, Steven F."
<shudgins@hhw-law.com>,"HUGHES, SARAH"
<HUGHS@andrews-kurth.com>,"Kayem,
Robin" <RSKAppraiser@email.msn.com>,"Keller, Kurt"
<kurt_keller@yahoo.com>,"Mattingly, Catherine"
<ckmattingly@hotmail.com>,"mcknight, alan"
<amcknight99@yahoo.com>,"Pappas, Merritt"
<merritt@supleeart.com>,"Thomas, Shannon"
<SHANNON.THOMAS@chase.com>,"Thompkins, Jason"
<Jason_Thompkins@enron.net>,"Vavrek, Kim"
<kvavrek@swbanktx.com>,William
W Diehl <William.Diehl@msdw.com>, caroldehan@hotmail.com

Subject:
Friday Party

	Add Addresses

People,

Several of us are getting together to rent out the party room at
Cadillac Bar
on Friday night.  If you must have a reason, it is to celebrate life
(or
you may pick one of your own personal triumphs to celebrate).

Please feel free to bring friends - we will start around 8 and it will
last until we get sick of each other.

Cadillac Bar is located at 1802 Shepherd near I-10.

See you there,

Corbin Barnes
Bryan Dehan
Mark Prescott
Cris Pye
Jason Thompkins


Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 05/31/2001 10:48 AM -----

	"Bill St. Clair" <billstclair@msn.com>
	05/31/2001 10:35 AM

		 To: "Betty Troy" <N999GT@aol.com>, "Carol St. Clair"
<Carol.St.Clair@enron.com>, "Gene Renz" <renzassoc@earthlink.net>, "Lynne
Smith" <elinorls@home.com>, "Suzanne Caver" <scaver3322@aol.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Arthur's Tennis Pictures

Pictures from Arthur's last tournament are now on the web.? The adress is
www.rookieleaguephoto.com then click on Select Sport, then Tennis, then
Kingwood CC Match 1.
?
Bill

?


I agree.  Please revise the form accordingly.

Thanks,

Kay

"Thompson, Peter J." <peterthompson@akllp.com> on 01/12/2001 09:35:53 AM
To: <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc: "Pipitone, Paul" <paulpipitone@akllp.com>, "Cobb, Chris"
<chriscobb@akllp.com>

Subject: RE: Fountain Valley/GE Facility Agreement

I have reviewed both the ABB and GE Agreements and have spoken to Paul
about this issue.  I do not believe it is necessary for the amount of
consideration to be listed in the final lien form. I believe that ABB
and GE can simply acknowledge that Seller has been paid in full or that
Purchaser has paid all sums owing to Seller under the agreement, or
similar language.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 5:24 PM
To: Thompson, Peter J.
Cc: Alan. Larsen (E-mail); Kay Mann (E-mail); Sheila Tweed (E-mail);
Pipitone, Paul; Cobb, Chris
Subject: Re: Fountain Valley/GE Facility Agreement

Pete,

I have a question.  Is it necessary for the amount of consideration to
be
listed in the final lien form (exhibit R or S, something like that)?  If
so, what amount goes in there?  Will this defeat what we are trying to
do
in keeping the original price a supposed mystery?

Thanks,

Kay


The London office is forwarding recent legal advice from our lawyers in South
Africa regarding FX clearances.  It seems that prior to transacting with a
South African party, we need copies of the party's "certification" from the
National Bank allowing the party to make payments out of the country (thereby
converting local currency to USD).  Such approvals are severely restricted.
I will forward the memos to Susan Bailey for inclusion in our "database" of
global advice.  Sara


Twanda Sweet 39402)


I meant Amy Fitzpatrick.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Buckley, Karen
Sent:	Monday, February 04, 2002 6:27 PM
Subject:	Employment with UBS

 << File: EmpApp.pdf >>

I have received a note from UBS to say they have not received your employement application form.  Pls completed the attached form and return to me.   Please ensure the following:

1.	You put city and state in the school/college section
2.	You complete a 10 year history of work (if in College/not working/ etc  please state with dates).

Regards,

Karen Buckley
ECS 05845


Steve,

Thanks.

Vince

Steven Leppard
08/25/2000 07:56 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: European Market Summary - trading day 24 August

Vince - I'm having you added to the circulation list.
Steve
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven Leppard/LON/ECT on 08/25/2000
07:58 AM ---------------------------

Homan Amiry
08/25/2000 03:51 AM
To: UK RAGS
cc:

Subject: European Market Summary - trading day 24 August

Please find below the European Market Summary. Now, also available via the
RAC Intranet site.

Homan Amiry


Hey!  Did you ever chat with my buddy Ishi?  Are you going to work for
Enron?  We get discounted deal tickets to Astroworld every April - you don't
want to miss that!!


Thanks Vince!
?
Will champagne do?? If not, name your price.
?
Do you have an email address for steve leppard?? I tried:
steve.leppard@enron.com?which  bounced back.
?
Thanks,
julie
?
ps - guess i'll finally meet you at the end of the month?
----- Original Message -----
From:  Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
To: Julie
Cc: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 1:36  PM
Subject: Re: Book order

Julie,

There are many employees in London? who  would be interested.
You can send? an inquiry to Steve  Leppard.

I had a presentation last night
to GARP in Houston and did  a commercial for the book.
You should put me on  commission.

Vince

"Julie" <julie@lacimagroup.com> on  01/31/2001 06:31:39 AM

Please respond to "Julie" <julie@lacimagroup.com>

To:??  <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:?  Re: Book order

Vince,

I wasn't sure if I responded to  your email, so apologise either for my
delayed response or repeating  myself.

Thanks for the 2nd order! I believe they have already  been? dispatched.
Yes, I believe we received payment; thank you very  much for? following up
with Paul. Glad the book was a hit!

On  another subject, are there any Enron employees in Europe who may  be
interested in attending either the energy or the weather course? Or,  are
the quants and risk management mostly handled out of  Houston?

Thanks again, and I'll forward an invoice on to  Shirley.

Julie

----- Original Message -----
From:? Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
To:  julie@lacima.co.uk
Cc: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
Sent:  Friday, January 26, 2001 11:29? PM
Subject: Book  order

Julie,

We received the shipment of 50 books.?  Thanks.

The book was an instant hit. We need 50 more?  books.

Vince

P.S. I understand Paul sent you the check for  the? remaining  50%


April 25, 2001

                 ***May Scheduled Maintenance Update***

PG&E Gas Transmission Northwest (GTN) will be performing a portion of the
previously canceled maintenance at Station 8 on May 1-2, 2001.  The
maintenance will be scheduled for 12 hours per day.

GTN will also be performing scheduled maintenance at Station 4C,
May 1-13, 2001.

The capacity at Kingsgate will be reduced to 2,360 MMcf/d for the period
May 1-2, 2001 and 2,460 MMcf/d for the period May 3-13, 2001.

For questions or additional assistance, please contact a Transportation
Coordinator at (503) 833-4300.

PG&E National Energy Group and any other
company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or
logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, the regulated California utility.  Neither
PG&E National Energy Group nor these other
referenced companies are regulated by the California Public
Utilities Commission.  Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
do not have to buy products from these companies in order
to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.


Shirley:

I am planning to take a vacation day on Jan. 4.

thanks,
--Stinson


Mark, have you had a chance to look at this?  I think it is fine but would
like you or someone in your group dealing with EOL sign off as well.

Thanks

Greg
---------------------- Forwarded by Greg Johnston/CAL/ECT on 10/03/2000 01:07
PM ---------------------------

Greg Johnston
09/25/2000 02:55 PM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT
Subject: EOL - Financial Power Swap

Mark, please see the note from Dianne below.  I will review the index
description for accuracy but I think someone in your group needs to review
the overall language for final sign-off before it goes live on EnronOnline.
Whoever is looking at the language can communicate directly with Dianne on
any concerns/changes.

Thanks

Greg
---------------------- Forwarded by Greg Johnston/CAL/ECT on 09/25/2000 02:52
PM ---------------------------

Dianne Seib
09/25/2000 02:31 PM
To: Greg Johnston/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc: Bill Greenizan/CAL/ECT@ECT
Subject: EOL - Financial Power Swap

Greg,

Attached is the product detail we will be sending to Houston so that they can
create a new EOL power product for us.  Can you let me know if everything
looks okay.

Thanks!

Dianne


Grasshopper,

Geat to hear from you. I am doing good. Learning alot on the trade desk.

Here is petes email address
peter.f.keavey@enron.com

laters

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Purvi Patel" <pnpatel@tecoenergy.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Purvi+20Patel+22+20+3Cpnpatel+40tecoenergy+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, August 09, 2001 1:54 PM
To:	Quigley, Dutch
Subject:	Question

Hi Dutch,

How are you ? U miss me at all? I wanted to know what pete's e-mail address was. I keep e-mailing him and it keeps coming back to me. thanks.

Purvi


The product long description below will fall under the new product type US
East Power Physical Index.  Credit has approved copying the profiles for the
new product type from the following:

US East Power Phy Fwd Firm

The only difference is the physical forward is based on a fixed price and the
physical index is based on an index price.

Tana,  when you talk to Leslie, please ask if we will apply the same
contracts as for the new product type above.

As usual, we need this ASAP.

Thanks.

Lisa
---------------------- Forwarded by Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT on 10/27/2000 11:43 AM
---------------------------

From:  Melba Lozano
  10/26/2000 11:53 AM

To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen H
Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rudi Zipter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bjorn
Hagelmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey W White/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Robert B Cass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: US Power Phy Index APPROVAL REQUEST!

Your review and approval of the following product type in the EOL Datamanager
is needed (for directions on approval , please see steps for approval at the
bottom of this e-mail).

Trader : Fletcher Sturm

Example:

US Pwr Phy Index MWD Ent Peak            Oct00      USD/MWh

A US Power Transaction with Enron Power Marketing, Inc., under which the
Seller shall sell and the Buyer shall purchase a quantity for firm energy
equal to the Hourly Quantity at the Contract Price.  The Contract Price shall
be the Floating Price, as adjusted by the price submitted by the Counterparty
via the website.  The period of time during which the Floating Price is
derived (a "Determination Period") shall be a calendar month during the term
of the Transaction; provided that, if the term of the Transaction is less
than one month, such Determination Period shall be the term of the
Transaction.

The transaction is for the applicable hours as set forth herein on each
Delivery Day for the Effective Date 01 Oct 2000 to the Termination Date 31
Oct 2000.

The transaction is for delivery or receipt of energy to any available point
Into Entergy System Border at Seller's daily election.

The Floating Price during a Determination Period shall be the average of the
daily prices listed in the Index for power delivered during Peak hours on
each Delivery Day during the applicable Determination Period.  The Floating
Price for each Determination Period shall be calculated utilizing the daily
prices published in Megawatt Daily's Market Report under the headings "Ranges
and Indexes of Trades for Standard 16-Hour Daily Products;Wtd. Av. Index;
Peak Hours, 0600 to 2200; Entergy, into"  (the "Index").

The price is quoted in US Dollars per unit of volume, which will be the
Contractual Currency.

The unit of measure against which the price is quoted shall be megawatt-hours
(MWh) and the quantity shown shall be in MW's delivered in each applicable
hour for the duration of the Transaction (the "Hourly Quantity').

The transaction is for on-peak ("Peak") hours on each Delivery Day beginning
with the hour ending 0700 (6:00 am) and concluding with the hour ending 2200
(10:00 pm) Central Prevailing Time. "Delivery Day" means a day during the
term of the transaction that is a Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, or
Friday, excluding any day that is a NERC holiday.

==============================================================================
=====
STEPS FOR APPROVAL:

click the  START button
select  PROGRAMS
select  TEST APPLICATIONS
select ENRONONLINE CLUSTER(PROD)
 PROCEED WITH USUAL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click the Enron Online Production Cluster "START" button
select EnronOnLine (this is the EOL Datamanager)
 PROCEED WITH EOL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click on the "+" for EnronOnLine
click on the "+" for Product Types
click on the "+" for "Awaiting Approval" (OR  "Partially Approved")
select the product requiring review as stated in e-mail above
Right "mouse" click on "properties" to view product set-up
TO APPROVE:  Right mouse click on "Approved"

Thanks - Rob Cass  -  Melba Lozano
x35491   x58986


I do not know what "updates" to FM you are  referring too?  I am unaware of
any changes or revisions to FM  language in the physical  agreements.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


The latest.


[IMAGE]      [IMAGE]     [IMAGE]    [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]              [IMAGE]   100% Money Back Guarantee  [IMAGE]        [IMAGE]   Take an additional 10% off our very low prices. Click, "Redeem" and let the savings begin.                   we offer the highest quality inkjet cartridges at the absolutely lowest prices anywhere.  In fact when you order  from us you can expect to save up to 80% off the retail prices.        [IMAGE]

 You  are subscribed to the RealBigWinners.com newsletter as: andrew.h.lewis@enron.com  If you wish to unsubscribe please click the link below:    Click Here to Unsubscribe

[IMAGE]


who is diamond dallas page?


Jinsung,

I have attached the requested information.

Respectfully Mitchell

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Jinsung Myung                           11/20/2000 08:23 AM

To: Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mitchell Hurt/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Brownsville Performance Data

Ben,

I attached table for Caledonia as well as Brownsville. Let's get the number
from Mitch.

Mitch: Could you please send attached file to Ben and myself?

Jinsung
(37330)

Benjamin Rogers@ECT
11/20/2000 08:18 AM
To: Jinsung Myung/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Brownsville Performance Data

---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 11/20/2000
08:17 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Richard Broussard @ ENRON                           11/20/2000 08:00 AM

To: Mitchell Hurt/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Brownsville Performance Data

Mitch,

Please provide this information to Benjamin Rogers.   I am on vacation this
week and don't have access to the data.

Thanks,
Rick

---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Broussard/Corp/Enron on
11/20/2000 07:52 AM ---------------------------

Benjamin Rogers@ECT
11/19/2000 02:59 PM
To: Richard Broussard/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject:

Rick:
Here is the file with the performance data we worked on for the 2000's.  A
Brownsville tab has been added - could you please assist us in putting this
data together for Brownsville.  Please give me a call if you have any
questions.  Thanks!
Ben


---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 10/31/2000
10:14 AM ---------------------------

Benjamin Rogers
10/31/2000 08:38 AM
To: JDaigh@Utilicorp.com
cc:
Subject:

Here are the '01 O&M Budgets.  Let me know if you have any questions.
Ben


---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 12/13/99 10:14 AM
---------------------------

Karen Lambert
12/13/99 10:09 AM
To: Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Connie
Sutton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EOL Rejected Masters

Rejected Master Contracts:

 Counterparty:  CP ID # 35578 City of Azusa
EPMI's Power Master Bilateral contract dated 1/18/95 should not be used.  EOL
should use an online GTC with collateral instead.

Counterparty:  CP ID # 11111 Gulf Canada Resources Limited
ECC's Master Purchase/Sale Firm (Calgary) contract dated 10/15/96 should not
be used by EOL per John Lavorato.

Please provide copies of the letters that go out where masters have been
rejected.

Thank you,
Karen


The report named: West Power Desk Daily Price Report <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=25&report_name=West+Power+Desk+Daily+Price+Report&category_cd=6&category_name=WEST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=6&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=12/28/2001>, published as of 12/28/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


15 miles of spinning - Monday 7pm - Memorial park

Huff's got the new fancy machine - check it out!


Yes - it's with APB - I've changed it.

	From:  Kimberly Indelicato                           04/13/2001 08:48 AM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: #581085.01

Kate, Spoke with Prebon and they don't show this trade. Could it be with
another Broker?

KI


That is terrible news. Do you know who he was and what role he played?

Eric, if you are contacted by anyone in the news media to discuss with and interview you related to Enron, I strongly recommend that you have no comments to make. I see no upside to you being mentioned in the papers or elsewhere. -L

----- Original Message -----
From: K. Bass <mailto:daphneco64@alltel.net>
To: Larry W. Bass <mailto:lwbthemarine@alltel.net> ; Eric Bass <mailto:Eric.Bass@enron.com>
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 11:02 AM
Subject: Tragedy

Just heard on the news that former Enron exec, Cliff Baxter, committed suicide this a.m.  That makes me ill.  LU