[IMAGE]	 	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]

             [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Upgrades  [IMAGE] DownGrades  [IMAGE] Coverage Initiated  [IMAGE] Coverage Reiterated  [IMAGE] Stock Splits  [IMAGE] Buybacks  [IMAGE] Dividends  [IMAGE] Pos Pre-Announce  [IMAGE] Neg Pre-Announce  [IMAGE] Pos Surprises  [IMAGE] Neg Surprises  [IMAGE] Earnings Revisions  [IMAGE] IPO - Lockup Periods  [IMAGE] IPO - Latest Pricing  [IMAGE] IPO - Quite Periods  [IMAGE] IPO - Postponements  [IMAGE] IPO - Withdrawals  [IMAGE] IPO - Latest Filings     [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] Unsubscribe  [IMAGE] Update  my Membership / Profile  [IMAGE] Forgot  Username / Password  [IMAGE] Add  / Edit Alerts  [IMAGE] View  My Alerts   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]    [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] 	  As requested, your News Alert for YHOO  follows from EquityAlert.com.     Sir Speedy First Print Provider to Debut New PrintMe Networks Technology; Sir Speedy Joins Adobe and Yahoo! to Launch EFI Technology for Mobile Professionals   MISSION VIEJO, Calif., Oct 22, 2001 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- Sir Speedy Inc., the world's largest printing, copying and digital network, today announced their alliance with Electronics for Imaging (EFI) (Nasdaq:EFII) to debut the new EFI PrintMe Networks(TM) technology.   The first print provider to introduce the new technology in the United States, Sir Speedy will enable PrintMe's print-anywhere technology to be used by business customers.   "Our relationship with EFI marks another milestone as Sir Speedy collaborates with some of the industry's most progressive companies," said Don Lowe, CEO of Sir Speedy.   "Our participation in the pilot fits squarely into our strategy of convenience that is supported by our global network of centers and the quick printing industry's most dynamic Web site, sirspeedy.com, recently named one of the best mobile Web sites by Mobile Computing & Communications."   Selected because of their high-quality products and customer service, Sir Speedy centers located in major metropolitan areas will fulfill the first printing jobs processed through PrintMe technology.   The Sir Speedy network's nearly 700 locations provide the vast infrastructure required to implement the print-anywhere technology. The partnership is consistent with the Sir Speedy network's core value of customer convenience and the company's strategic goal to enhance the way Sir Speedy customers do business.   "Our technology is designed to make printing more convenient and to make finding a print provider as easy as finding an ATM," said Guy Gecht, EFI CEO.   "With the support of their worldwide infrastructure of digital printing and copying expertise, Sir Speedy is the first U.S. print provider to introduce our technology and bring the PrintMe Network technology to thousands of professionals."   The e-business objective of Sir Speedy is to provide more efficient ways for customers to do business. PrintMe technology allows customers to transfer files for fulfillment to Sir Speedy centers via e-mail, PCs and wireless application protocol (WAP)-enabled devices and touch-tone telephones.   Customers can be confident that a reliable print provider will produce their documents to their exact specifications. The pilot program begins the end of October in centers located in the Dallas area. Additional participating areas will be unveiled throughout 2002.   About Sir Speedy  Sir Speedy, with headquarters in Mission Viejo, is the world's leading franchisor of printing, copying and digitally networked centers with nearly 700 locations nationwide. The Sir Speedy Global Digital Network, with its alliance partners, spans more than 1,000 centers in 30 countries.   For more information, contact Sir Speedy Inc. at 26722 Plaza Drive, Mission Viejo, Calif., 92690, or call 800/SIRSPEEDY, outside of the United States call 949/348-5000. Visit the company's Web site at www.sirspeedy.com.   About Electronics For Imaging  Electronics for Imaging (www.efi.com) is the world leader in software and hardware imaging solutions for networked printing. EFI technology allows copiers, printers, and digital presses to be shared across work groups, the enterprise and the Internet.   The results are greater productivity, improved document management, seamless networking, and the assured quality of color and black-and-white images. The company's OEM partners look to EFI to deliver products that help grow sales and reduce costs associated with internal development and support.   Competitive, feature-rich solutions, such as the Fiery(R), EDOX(R) and Splash(TM) brands of networked image processors and the eBeam(TM) brand of Web-enabled whiteboard systems, are an outgrowth of the company's determination to offer OEMs and end-users alike the highest assurance of innovation, quality, reliability, and support. The company employs more than 900 people and maintains 22 offices worldwide.   CONTACT:          Sir Speedy Inc., Mission Viejo                   Bridget DiRico (editorial), 949/348-5000                   bdirico@sirspeedy.com                   www.sirspeedy.com URL:              http://www.businesswire.com Today's News On The Net - Business Wire's full file on the Internet with Hyperlinks to your home page.  Copyright (C) 2001 Business Wire.  All rights reserved.  -0-   KEYWORD:          CALIFORNIA INDUSTRY KEYWORD: CONSUMER/HOUSEHOLD                   PUBLISHING                   RETAIL                   MARKETING                   AGREEMENT                   SOURCE:                   Sir                   Speedy                   Inc.    [IMAGE]    ***IMPORTANT NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER REGARDING THIS COURTESY EMAIL***   At your request, as a subscriber to our service, this email alert is being sent to you as a courtesy and is for information purposes only. We are a financial news re-distributor. We are not an investment advisory and do not purport to tell or suggest which companies you should monitor or which securities you should purchase or sell.   In addition to the information regarding the company you are monitoring (the "Monitored Company"), this email contains advertisements describing products, services or companies for which we receive fees from the advertising companies. In the case of Cybertrader, distribution of this advertisement forms a component of a content exchange agreement with RealTimeTraders.com, Inc. We reserve the right to sell all or part of these shares at anytime, either before, during or after the advertisement period.   In addition, not withstanding our policy of prohibiting employees from buying or selling securities of an advertising company for a period of 20 days following dissemination of the advertisement, we may not be able to effectively monitor our employees to ensure compliance with the same. Consequently, there may be sales and/or purchases of such securities by our employees prior to, during and immediately following the dissemination of the advertisement.   Please note that (1) this email may not contain the full text of the press release issued by, or the research or other reports regarding, the Monitored Company; and (2) the text of the advertisement, the press release and/or reports were obtained from third party sources and were not written, generated or edited by us; accordingly, we make no representations or give any assurance as to the accuracy or completeness, nor have we conducted any independent investigations of, the disclosures regarding the subject matter of such releases and reports.   Please note that links to the advertising company and/or Monitored Company are provided for your convenience. We assume no obligation for the content of such sites.   All information contained herein should be independently verified by you with the advertising company or with Monitored Company or any other sources you prefer.   [THIS IS ONLY A SUMMARY OF, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO, THE "EQUITYALERT SUBSCRIBER AGREEMENT AND DISCLAIMER." PLEASE VISIT http://www.equityalert.com/home/disclaim.asp  FOR ACCESS TO OUR COMPLETE DISCLAIMER]        	  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Stock  Quote [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Stock  Chart [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Covered  Calls  [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Company  Profile [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Option  Details  [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Black  - Scholes [IMAGE]     Sector/Industry Changes  Power Option PLUS Logo     [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]    [IMAGE]


Tom/Tana-

Genesis ventures migrated last night. The counterparty needs to be retouched
on the 5 European products (read only) and also US Recycled ONP Physical
(trade).

I would appreciate it if you could revisit this counterparty when you get a
chance.

Best Regards,

Nicole Hunter
Clickpaper Support Team
713-345-8438


Shelley, I just found out this message did not go.  I am trying again.  Thanks Lynn
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)

-----Original Message-----
From: Blair, Lynn <Lynn.Blair@ENRON.com>
To: 'shelly.corman@enron.com' <shelly.corman@enron.com>
CC: Blair, Lynn <Lynn.Blair@ENRON.com>
Sent: Sat Oct 20 19:46:45 2001
Subject: Update

Shelly, Just wanted to update you on a few things.

1.  Steve and I have been asked to work with McGown and Steve Kirk on the SLA settlement.  There is a meeting in Omaha we are attending on Wed. With Mary Kay and Dave.

2.  There is a marketing issue in relation to NNG procedures on monitoring stranger's gas.  There is a meeting Thursday morning with Dave and Mary Kay. After that mtg Dari, Mary and I are going to review procedures for any changes.

3.  I will conference in for Thursday's Customer Service mtg.
I hate not being there but I think these other meetings are big enough to have presence in Omaha

4.  The SoCal meeting was very beneficial. Only one possible variance from what we had previously heard.  There is a possibility SoCal could reduce capacity at ID2.  Pat and I talked abot TW concerns.  I will review with marketing and the team when I get back.

I love my Blackberry, but still getting used to typing on it.  Anxious to hear how the paging worked for you.

Hope your trip to Florida was good.  Also hope you can Make since of This email.

Thanks Lynn

--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


Yes, please send out a revised sheet with non-eol trades included.  Please
send it out early this morning and then we will send the final sheet by noon
today.

Thanks,

Mike


---------------------- Forwarded by Eve Puckett/Corp/Enron on 02/02/2001
03:35 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Eve Puckett                           02/02/2001 03:27 PM

To: Brenna Neves/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Leslie Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Regina Blackshear/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Diane
Salcido/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lois Ford/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sharon
Peace/NA/Enron@ENRON, Angela Barnett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angela Gill/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Work Performance

Brenna,
         This probably isn't the best time to be mentioning this, and I don't
want you to think there is any motive behind it because reviews are currently
in process, but I wanted to briefly talk to you about Judy Hernandez:

I think she puts in a great work performance for many reasons:

1) She is ALWAYS willing to help out when someone is backed up on projects.
2) If you ask her to help you out with something, it's completed within the
same day or early the next day.
3) She is NEVER in a bad mood, and if she is she certainly doesn't let you
know about it nor take out her frustrations on anyone.
4) She is very knowledgeable when it comes to questions about deals being
acceptable or not.
5) If she can't answer your question she points you in the right direction
for it to be answered.

I just wanted to let you know how much I appreciate working with her.
Thanks-Eve


I'm good with Maria's changes.  Thanks both.  DF

Maria Pavlou
11/06/2000 10:14 AM
To: Steve Kirk/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: New Product Version - Daily TFX

I made a few revisions.  Pls. call me if you have any questions.  thanks,
Maria

Steve Kirk
11/06/2000 08:51 AM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: New Product Version - Daily TFX

Tony is on vacation today.  Please review asap.  Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Steve Kirk/ET&S/Enron on 11/06/2000 08:49
AM ---------------------------

Steve Kirk
11/06/2000 07:47 AM
To: Tony Pryor/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Jo Williams/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: New Product Version - Daily TFX

Tony, I need your review and approval asap for the attached E.Dubuque
delivery products that are "daily" in nature (one is for receipt at Ventura
and the other is for receipt at Demarc).  The rate aspect is the same
language as the one-part rates we have already used (designated as "R+C).
This "Dly" designation means that the term is one day which will be rolled
over day-to-day unless either party cancels the rollover.  The term language
shown here is the same as the "daily" language we have been using.  Call me
with your questions. Thanks. x7067.


Starting next Wednesday you have EB30C2 for your Fundies Meeting from 3:00 PM to 4:30 PM

-Ina


This is the list of CEO's expected at the President's meeting tomorrow on tax
issues.

----- Forwarded by Linda Robertson/NA/Enron on 02/06/2001 03:50 PM -----

	Gian-Carlo_A._Peressutti@who.eop.gov
	02/06/2001 03:42 PM

		 To: Linda.robertson@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: here ya go!

(See attached file: fortune5Bios.doc)

 - fortune5Bios.doc


Jeff --

Our Internal Communications group is continuing to look for ways to
communicate with employees in a timely manner about hot topics that are of
interest to them.  We're also looking to increase your exposure with
employees.  We have a new idea, which Sherri discussed briefly with you a
couple of weeks ago.  It's called "Jeff's Corner" and it will be a regular
video message that will be posted on the intranet -- which can be accessed by
99.9% of our employees.

This is how it will work.  We will tape a 2-3 minute video of you talking
about what's top of mind at that moment.  The tone and style will be like
your floor meetings (one of your best employee venues), casual and
conversational.  We suggest the first topic be "The State of Enron."  There
is a lot of talk among employees about the cheap shots we've taken as a
company and by you and Ken, about the decline in our stock price and about
the widespread re-deployment efforts.   These recent events are  beginning to
affect morale.  Employees are concerned and want to be assured that we're on
the right side, that they will have jobs, that Enron will be here next year.
You've helped reassure them about these things at recent floor meetings;
however, that is only a small part of our global work force.  Having your own
corner on the intranet will have a farther reach, and we have the capability
to do this in-house at very low cost.

We recommend making this a regular communication feature at least monthly,
although since this would only involve a few minutes of your time, you could
even tape a message to employees weekly.  The nice thing about this medium is
we have the ability to respond immediately to current events, and having you
speak to employees gives the message credibility.

Future topics could address new cost saving procedures, update on Dabhol, the
PRC, reasons behind an organizational announcement, The Pulse survey, etc.
We'd like this to be a forum where you can talk about topics you'd like to
discuss.

I've checked with the technical team, and we have the capability do this
now.  I will check your calendar with Sherri.  Let me know if you have any
questions.

Mary


<title>Claim Your FREE* Ring!</title>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">

January 22, 2002

The following message was sent to you as an opt-in subscriber to Sweepsclub.com. We will continue to bring you valuable offers on the products and services that interest you most. If you wish to unsubscribe please copy and paste the following link into your web browser http://www.sweepsclub.com/r/?i=2062543959&m=2555719&a=ea%3ddon.baughman@enron.com or click here.

If any questions or comments email us at MailService
@sweepsclub.com.

Re: Valuable FREE Reward
#0172B

Congratulations

You have been selected
to receive a beautiful, Genuine Garnet Ring, appraised by a certified
gemologist at $62.00 for FREE! Yes, this is not a misprint —
this lovely ring, that you’ll be happy to show off is yours FREE!
All we ask is that you pay $4.95 to help defray our postage, handling
and insurance costs.

Call
Now!

1-800-538-0172

Click
here for further details on how to claim your free Genuine Garnet
Ring. Please note that this is a very special, limited time opportunity.

Call
Now!

Operators
Are Standing By

1-800-538-0172

Offer Ends Soon!

Name
Of Article: Lady’s
genuine garnet,

cubic zirconia accented, and gold-plated designer ring

Approximate:
3 oval, faceted

garnets

Weight: 4 ct.tw.

1 = 9x7 mm oval

2= 7x5 mm oval

Additional: 3
round, faceted

cubic zirconia accent stones

3 mm diameter

Base
Metal: 14kt. yellow
gold-electroplate

Estimated Retail Appraisal Value: $62.00

QUALITY
ASSURANCE CERTIFICATION:

 *The
Garnet Ring is FREE through this limited time offer. All we ask
is that you pay $4.95 to defray the postage, handling, and insurance
costs.


Yes, I'll be working a regular 5x8 schedule.

What voicemail?  Are you thinking of someone else?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Fagan, Fran
Sent:	Tuesday, February 26, 2002 10:54 AM
To:	Donoho, Lindy
Subject:	RE: Lindy Donoho - Work Schedule

Are you going to be working a regular 5x8 schedule?

Did my voicemail address your question from yesterday?

Thanks,

Fran

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Donoho, Lindy
Sent:	Tuesday, February 26, 2002 10:49 AM
To:	Robertson, Audrey
Cc:	Fagan, Fran; Harris, Steven
Subject:	Lindy Donoho - Work Schedule

Effective March 1, 2002, I will not be working the 9/80 schedule anymore.  Please let me know if you need anything else from me.

Thanks,
Lindy


fyi.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ordway, Chris
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 8:15 AM
To: Boudreaux, Shanna; Garcia, Clarissa; Lamadrid, Victor; Townsend,
Judy; Versen, Victoria
Subject: FW: TE Critical System Warning

FYI...

Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: infopost@duke-energy.com [mailto:infopost@duke-energy.com]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 12:00 AM
To: infopost@duke-energy.com
Subject: TE Critical System Warning

November 26, 2001

As indicated by the Critical System Warning issued November 25, 2001,
based on anticipated system operations and weather conditions, as stated
below, TEXAS EASTERN TRANSMISSION, LP (Texas Eastern) is requiring that
all customers take immediate and prompt steps to eliminate excess
receipts and conform scheduled receipts to actual deliveries. This
system-wide warning is issued as a result of actual receipts into the
system significantly exceeding actual deliveries. This Critical System
Warning shall remain in place until further notice.

Weather in the market area continues to be unseasonably mild and
shippers have been filling contract storage inventories in anticipation
of the coming winter heating season.  At this time, Texas Eastern's
storage capacity is approximately 98% full.  As a result, there is
virtually no storage capacity or linepack available for system
operational purposes and Texas Eastern cannot continue to absorb actual
imbalances left on the system.

Because of the critical nature of this situation and the fact that Texas
Eastern no longer has the ability to further absorb imbalances being
left on the system, Texas Eastern requests that all customers coordinate
with their suppliers the actual quantities received into the system to
match actual customer takes in the market area.  No due pipe gas will be
accepted into the system until further notice.

If immediate action does not result in reducing the current volume of
gas being left on the system, Texas Eastern may be forced to issue an
operational flow order ("OFO") requiring actual receipts of gas to match
actual deliveries out of the system, which will be subject to the OFO
non-compliance penalty of $25 per dekatherm.  In addition and as
provided for in Texas Eastern's FERC Gas Tariff, Texas Eastern will take
any other actions as may be necessary to protect the integrity of its
system, including, but not limited to, suspension of OBA's.

*******************************************************************

NOTE:

Duke Energy Gas Transmission respects your online time and privacy.
You have received this email because you elected to subscribe. To
unsubscribe, login to the E-mail Notification Subscription page at
http://www.link.duke-energy.com/script2/Notification.asp
uncheck the appropriate checkbox, and click the Submit button.


Just wanted to keep everyone on point in terms of the importance and
expectations of getting this King Ranch issue cleaned up for the prior months
and correct on a go forward basis.  I spoke with Brenda on Friday to give her
an update of our progress and one of the things that she stressed and wanted
passed on to the team was the expectations that King Ranch would be clean
(scheduled and allocated correctly)  for March and foward.  As of Thursday
night's   P &L calc., unaccounted for March 2000 on Texas was a little over
400,000 mmbtus.  As you all know, that number is way too high and should be a
lot lower (on a bad month, no more than 100,000 mmbuts).  Hopefully, if King
Ranch is the part of the problem for  March and we get these issues resolved,
March will not be an issue.  I appreciate everyone's committment so far and
hopefully we can apply this team concept in the future to prevent crisis
modes like this from here on out.  If anyone has questions or concerns,
please do not hesitate to let me know.  Thanks!

Howard B Camp
03/20/2000 08:46 AM
To: Karry Kendall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clem
Cernosek/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stella L Morris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rita
Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fred Boas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: HPLR Liquids / Humble Gas Pipeline

We need to get together this afternoon at 2:00 PM in room 3745 to discuss how
we will schedule and allocate the HPLR Liquids coming into Humble Gas
Pipeline at meter 8793.  Karry, it is my understanding that you do not want
an intercompany sale from HPLR Liquids to HPLC at this point.   How do you
plan to get this gas to King Ranch since HPLR Liquids does not have a
transport on Humble?

Daren, the intercompany HPLC purchase  is how it is set up currently in MOPS.

Robert, since Stella is out, we will need someone to represent Logistics.

HC


Paul,

Greg has to attend an offsite all day on Thursday, January 20 and will be
unable to meet with Raymond Yeow.

Liz


Joannie,

Thanks. I think dinner is a better forum for Jeff.

Vince

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Williamson, Joannie
Sent:	Thursday, August 02, 2001 1:56 PM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J; Causey, Richard
Cc:	Lemmons Jr., Billy; Brenner, Ursula
Subject:	RE: Spring 2001 Energy Finance Conference Participation by Jeffrey  K. Skilling

Jeff has agreed to participate.  Please advise if he should  present at the dinner or at lunch on Friday?

Thanks,
Joannie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kaminski, Vince J
Sent:	Thursday, August 02, 2001 8:36 AM
To:	Williamson, Joannie; Causey, Richard
Cc:	Lemmons Jr., Billy; Kaminski, Vince J
Subject:	RE: Spring 2001 Energy Finance Conference Participation by Jeffrey  K. Skilling

Joannie:

Thanks
Here is the message for Jeff:

Jeff,

I am asking you on my behalf and on behalf of Rick Causey to make a keynote presentation
at the annual Energy Finance Conference at the University of Texas at Austin. The conference
is tentatively scheduled to take place on February 21 - 22, 2002. Depending on your calendar, the
conference organizers can reserve a time slot for your presentation at the conference dinner
(February 21, 2002, Thursday) or lunch (February 22, 2002, Friday).

This annual conference is devoted to financial engineering in the energy business. The topics covered
in the past meetings  included applications of real options technology to the energy business, risk management
and the future of deregulation. The agenda of the last conference is attached for your review; the agenda
for the 2002 event is under development.

Given Enron's relationship with UT and our interest in the Energy Finance program,
a great source of highly skilled talent for our Analyst / Associate Program, we think that your participation
will benefit the company. The conference is widely attended by senior executives of other
energy companies and is an excellent forum to present Enron's accomplishments and the
agenda for the future.

Vince Kaminski

 << File: UT_2001 Conference schedule1.doc >>

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Williamson, Joannie
Sent:	Wednesday, August 01, 2001 4:31 PM
To:	Causey, Richard; Kaminski, Vince J
Subject:	RE: Spring 2001 Energy Finance Conference Participation by Jeffrey  K. Skilling

No problem.

Joannie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Causey, Richard
Sent:	Wednesday, August 01, 2001 3:51 PM
To:	Williamson, Joannie; Kaminski, Vince J
Subject:	FW: Spring 2001 Energy Finance Conference Participation by Jeffrey  K. Skilling

Vince:

Will you pull together a summary of the event and get it to Joannie?  Joannie, please get that to Jeff and let him know it is from both Vince and me.  Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Williamson, Joannie
Sent:	Wednesday, August 01, 2001 3:25 PM
To:	Causey, Richard
Cc:	Kaminski, Vince J
Subject:	RE: Spring 2001 Energy Finance Conference Participation by Jeffrey  K. Skilling

The dates work on his schedule.  I can print this e-mail and show it to him or you could put together another e-mail.  It is your choice.

Thanks,
Joannie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Causey, Richard
Sent:	Wednesday, August 01, 2001 2:38 PM
To:	Williamson, Joannie
Cc:	Kaminski, Vince J
Subject:	RE: Spring 2001 Energy Finance Conference Participation by Jeffrey  K. Skilling

Would you please look for Vince and me whether this would work for Jeff?  Please let us know what we need to do to present this to him.  thanks
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kaminski, Vince J
Sent:	Wednesday, August 01, 2001 2:01 PM
To:	Causey, Richard
Subject:	FW: Spring 2001 Energy Finance Conference Participation by Jeffrey  K. Skilling

Rick,

Would you look us to make a joint appeal to Jeff to speak
at this conference? Our friends at UT were very disappointed last
time that Jeff had other commitments and I suggested they should
try to get on his schedule early for the 2002 event.

Vince
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Ehud I. Ronn" <eronn@mail.utexas.edu>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Ehud+20I+2E+20Ronn+22+20+3Ceronn+40mail+2Eutexas+2Eedu+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, July 31, 2001 5:39 PM
To:	Causey, Richard; Kaminski, Vince J
Cc:	George Gau; titman@mail.utexas.edu
Subject:	Spring 2001 Energy Finance Conference Participation by Jeffrey  K. Skilling

Rick / Vince:

Greetings.  I trust this e-mail finds you both well.

Further to my discussions with Vince two weeks ago, I write you at this
time in my capacity as Director of the Center for Energy Finance Education
and Research (CEFER).  As we did in Feb. '01, my colleagues and I are
planning a practitioner-industry Conference in Spring 2002, tentatively
scheduled for 2/21 - 2/22/02.  The Conference will kick off with a
dinner/keynote address Thur. evening, then continue all day Fri.

I would like to extend an invitation to Enron Corp. President Jeff Skilling
to be the keynote speaker at the Thur. evening dinner or the Fri. lunch
(whichever he prefers).  I appreciate your kind offer to relay this
invitation to Mr. Skilling's office for his consideration.  If at this
stage he has timing constraints in the late Feb. - early March 2002 period,
we would be happy to work around them in the scheduling of the Conference.

Although the format for 2002's conference may differ from that used in Feb.
2001, for completeness I enclose herewith a copy of the 2001 Conference
Program.

With thanks for your intercession on our behalf,
Ehud Ronn

 - 2001 Conference schedule1.doc << File: 2001 Conference schedule1.doc >>

==============================================
     Ehud I. Ronn
     Professor of Finance and Jack S. Josey Professor in Energy Studies
     Director, Center for Energy Finance Education and Research
     McCombs School of Business
     University of Texas at Austin
     Austin, TX. 78712-1179
     Voice:  (512) 471-5853
      FAX:   (512) 471-5073
      Internet:  eronn@mail.utexas.edu
=================================================


ENA is selling the Power Gas Marketing pool gas behind East Ohio
(10,000/month)  to EES for the month of July.  EES has the ability to take
this gas for the term of the deal (through Oct 2000).  I told Marde we would
talk about that after the 4th.  EES will nominate this gas directly from
Power's pool, so Heidi does not need to be involved at all.   Heidi, it looks
like this pool can be terminated.

Peoples, for July ENA is selling 430/day to Clinton Energy (Latrobe).  Heidi
is working on that.  Heidi also informed me yesterday that CES was
terminating the Peoples pool effective 8/1/2000.  I suggested that we may
need to transfer the pool to ENA, because there will still be activity in
August due to the Latrobe fuel credit.  However, we may be able to transfer
any balances to EES effectve 8/1/2000.  Hopefully, we can talk about this
after the 4th.

Let me know if anyone has any questions.


Please hold Thursday, December 20th for Board and committee meetings from 7:30 a.m. to 2:00 p.m., C.S.T.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Valencia, Laura
Sent:	Thursday, December 06, 2001 9:29 AM
To:	Joyce, Mary; Buy, Rick; McMahon, Jeffrey; Bowen Jr., Raymond; Causey, Richard; Horton, Stanley
Cc:	Wright, Teresa; Heathman, Karen K.; Ford, Sue; Schiller, Marsha; Sullo, Sharon E; Carson, Rick L.; DeSpain, Tim; Parsons, Andrew; Westbrook, Sharron; Rieker, Paula; Stark, Cindy; West, Terry; Butler, Pam; Moore, Georgene
Subject:	Board Meeting Update
Importance:	High

As you are aware, we are in the process of rescheduling the Enron Corp. Board of Directors meeting.  Due to the proximity of the Holidays we will hold committee meetings and Board meeting on the same day.

Therefore, please let us know today the minimum amount of time you would need for your respective committee meetings.

Please be aware that some of our Directors will be joining the meeting via teleconference and we will therefore need to do all mail outs at least one week in advance.

As soon as we have a firm date for the Board meeting, we will advise you.

Thank you.

Laura Valencia
Executive Assistant
Tel:  713-853-6485
Fax:  713/853-2534


Would you research this please?

Thanks

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 03/15/2000 09:54
AM ---------------------------

bperron@columbiaenergygroup.com on 03/15/2000 09:07:58 AM
To: " - *Chris.Germany@enron.com" <Chris.Germany@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Capacity Offer

I was asked to forward this to you.
---------------------- Forwarded by Brian Perrone/CES/ColumbiaGas on
03/15/2000
10:06 AM ---------------------------

KIM NOVSEK BIZIK
03/15/2000 09:58 AM

To: Doug Kinney/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Brian
Perrone/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc:
Subject: Capacity Offer

Doug and Brian,  can you forward this to Chris Germany.

---------------------- Forwarded by Kim Novsek Bizik/CES/ColumbiaGas on
03/15/2000 09:57 AM ---------------------------

afilas@keyspanenergy.com on 03/15/2000 09:51:09 AM
Please respond to afilas@keyspanenergy.com

To: lverona@hess.com, jschiavi@hess.com, Sharonbaker@williams.com,
Michael_Jessup@vapower.com, Duane_Blackowell@vapower.com,
Darren_Angerman@transcanada.com, Mccarwh@texaco.com, Johns00@texaco.com,
Carlnunziato@southernenergy.com, Vincent.tennariello@pseg.com,
Tjcrupi@papl.com, Bryan.Frey@gen.pge.com, CSB@ptrcom.com,
Tracey-Barnett@PerryGas.com, Kholub@PCEnergy.com, CFrezza@NUI.com,
NAU87@aol.com, JBurgess@Noblegas.com, GBBarth@njng.com, SILBER2D@KochiND.com,
SandyRengel@engageenergy.com, Tony.Muscarello@CESOURCE.com, JTOZZ@aol.com,
CKROG98@aol.com, JFoard@Coral-energy.com, KMLI@Dynegy.com, CJWA@Dynegy.com,
MarkG@Cook-Inlet.com, Rob.Gennarini@conectiv.com, MAOtters@utilicorp.com,
pegarner@duke-energy.com, maureen.smith@enron.com, dmueller@sempratrading.com,
tracy.wood@pgees.com, tcampo@njne.com, supply@castlepower.com,
sjfuel@mindspring.com, saulh@econnergy.com, rperez@allenergy.com,
rdauria@reliantenergy.com, quartiersm@nmenergy.com, pbaratz@totalnrg.com,
mnaeser@naenergy.com, metroenergy@worldnet.att.net, mcasas@statoilenergy.com,
marci.mansfield@pgees.com, lsmorris@MetromediaEnergy.com, Kim Novsek
Bizik/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS, kmgorden@duke-energy.com,
jneubauer@naenergy.com, jlupdale@metromediaenergy.com,
jgarofalow@castlepower.com, jbutkus@UtiliCorp.com, james.breslin@pseg.com,
intenergy@aol.com, energon@aol.com, cruikshankk@conedsolutions.com,
clombardi@advanix.net, ceine@aol.com, cbender22@aol.com,
tkain@worldnet.att.net, jcrowley@sempratrading.com
cc:
Subject: Capacity Offer

Attached is a capacity offer being made by Brooklyn Union of New York
(formerly Brooklyn Union).

If you experience any difficulty opening the attached file, or have any
questions pertaining to the offer, please call me at (718) 403-2981.

All bids must be faxed to  (718) 643-6306 no later than the specified
date on the attachment.

 - Offer


Thanks -I've passed your feedback onto my team. That said, we couldn't have
done it without your commitment. Yours and Cindy's  names behind the project
has ensured its success at grass roots level, and made the HR community
listen to us.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 09/08/2000
04:55 PM ---------------------------

Stinson Gibner
09/08/2000 03:59 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: technical corner, revised version

---------------------- Forwarded by Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT on 09/08/2000
03:59 PM ---------------------------
From: Giuseppe Paleologo@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS on 08/02/2000 02:59 PM
To: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Samer Takriti/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
Subject: technical corner, revised version

Stinson, I am attaching a slightly revised version of the technical note. I
tried to make the content clearer, and wrote estimators that are both
consistent and unbiased. Please feel free to change it.

             Giuseppe


Got a call from Dynegy.  Culled the following:

Bankruptcy
Dynegy will be fighting for a seat at the creditor table, since PG&E's filing
failed (said Dynegy) to include a substantial amount of Dynegy receivables
stemming from gas sales.

Legislative investigation into wholesale power markets
The request they received from the legislative committee (Dunn?) looking into
wholesale prices included 86 questions, including:
Every bid made into ISO/PX markets since day 1.
Every document showing every forecast of energy prices done by the company.
Every document regarding bids for utility power plants leading up to
divestiture.
Every document regarding communications with any other generator/trade
association.

In a meeting with Dunn last week, he told Dynegy that the committee will
thoroughly investigate whether there's been market manipulation.  If there's
been none, no one has anything to worry about, and the committee would then
move on to examine whether "the market is dysfunctional."

The first hearings (this Wednesday and next) will examine all of the other
investigations currently underway (e.g., CPUC, ISO, FERC, class action suit,
AG (uncertain).

The generators will be up first (on the 25th, as it currently stands),
followed by marketers, followed by the munis.

The committee is requesting that the generators send their CEOs---rumors
(perhaps far-fetched) that the committee wants to set it up like the
congressional tobacco hearings.


- Ljun0100.doc


Very good!


---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES on 09/01/2000 05:51
PM ---------------------------

Jeff Dasovich
09/01/2000 05:31 PM
To: jdasovic@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Possible Messages on Legislation in California

Here's an attempt at being frank about the legislation without jeopardizing
our relationships or commercial prospects.

Overall, we respect the effort, but California failed to get the ball over
the goal line:

On Siting
Intentionally or not, California has designed power plant siting laws that
make it excruciatingly difficult to construct power plants in the state.
Folks seem to have lost sight of the need to balance growth and environmental
quality in California.
That's why nothing's been built in the state for a decade and developers are
going outside the state to build power plants.
Tinkering around the edges won't help; and (with all due respect) the
legislation passed yesterday tinkers.
Real reform is required if California hopes to build the supply necessary to
keep pace with Silicon Valley and a high tech culture and tame the price
spikes.
If developers continue to have to navigate through a maze of a half a
dozen--or more--state and local agencies, California's supply problems will
continue, or worsen.
California needs real, one-stop shopping and it needs it now.

On the retail price cap
They don't work (we've already developed all the arguments, so I won't repeat
them hear)
The press has already reported that the measure the Legislature passed simply
puts off the day of reckoning.
It's like using your credit card--eventually they're going to knock on your
door to collect.
Now, families and businesses will have a hard time managing their budgets
because they can't gauge the size of the balloon payment they'll face a
couple of years down the road.
So San Diegans who continue to take service from SDG&E will pay the same
amount, but the cap will remove the powerful incentive prices create to use
electricity wisely--bad solution.
There's a better answer:
Instead of urging consumers not to switch, encourage customers to sign with
another retail provider.
Clearly, the biggest mistake California made was neglecting to establish a
retail market in its restructuring legislation.
Urging customers to stay with the utility made matters worse, given the
volatility of the Power Exchange. (Variable rate mortgage story.)
But some customers who did switch and who took a fixed-price deal with
companies like ours are doing very well.
But for the press reports, the customers who switched to those deals hardly
know there's a crisis.
So California needs to follow's Pennsylvania's lead and make a market that
works for retail customers.
If the price spikes in the PX worry you, the best way to protect yourself is
to leave the utility and switch to another provider who's willing to take on
that risk on your behalf.
Remove the monopoly that California originally granted to the PX.
Just like the customers who switched, the utilities could have bought
fixed-price power and protected themselves from the PX's price volatility.
But for some crazy reason, California forced the utilities to buy everything
from PX.
And the utilities have complained about it---even former monopolies don't
like buying from a monopoly.
Let the utility buy from any competitive source available.
Don't meld the PX with the ISO---that would simply re-enforce the PX monopoly
and make a bad situation much worse.
Make California's ISO a for-profit "Transco," like we have in our interstate
gas pipeline system
[[I leave this last recommendation as food for thought.  May be too much to
bite off.]]

Have a good holiday.

Best,
Jeff


Perhaps...


PRESENTATIONS THAT WORK
   August 29 & 30 in EB560

     Does your job include preparing and delivering presentations? . . . . .
. .  Then this course is for you!

This course focuses on instruction and practice in organization, delivery
skills, design tips and use of visuals effectively (powerpoint and overhead),
and question-and-answer models.  Participants will receive personalized,
confidential feedback from the instructor and will develop a self-improvement
action plan.  Customized exercises give participants first-hand experience in
one-on-one, small groups, impromptu, and sit-down settings.

For registration, please click here () to go directly into the Development
Center "Ernie", or call 3-0357.


Yes, thanks.
m

To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: EGM presentation

You'll have it this morning.  Did you get my "three points focus" for 2001 ?

G


Commodity Law Rewrite Still Alive
CQ Weekly
December 9, 2000

A deal to revive legislation (H.R. 4541) that would rewrite the nation,s
commodities laws appeared to be in the works after meetings the week of
December 4 between representatives of Chicago,s big commodities exchanges and
the senator who had been blocking the bill.

Representatives of the Chicago Board of Trade and Chicago Mercantile Exchange
reached a tentative agreement with Senator Phil Gramm, R-Texas, chairman of
the Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee, on compromise language that
would reauthorize the Commodity Exchange Act and set new ground rules for the
trading of a complicated class of investments known as derivatives,
congressional aides said.

The language was being reviewed by aides to the House Agriculture, Banking
and Commerce committees, each of which had a hand in drafting the original
bill, as well as by the Treasury Department.

If there are no objections, the language could be attached to the
still-pending fiscal 2000 Labor-HHS-Education appropriations bill (H.R. 4577).

The original commodities bill passed the House 377-4, on October 19.

However, Gramm has blocked the measure because of concerns over how it would
affect the legal status if a type of privately negotiated contracts known as
swaps.  Swaps, which are used by large corporations to hedge market risk,
account for a global market worth nearly $90 trillion, according to the Bank
for International Settlements in Switzerland.

The legislation would keep swaps unregulated.  It would also give the
commodities exchanges a boost by authorizing the trading of futures contracts
based on single stocks.

Trading such investments on U.S. exchanges is currently prohibited because
the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the Securities and Exchange
Commission cannot agree on who would regulate the instruments.  The
legislation would give both agencies regulatory oversight.


i looked for cros but i couldn't find him.  i told him where i would be and
i  was there the whole time.  my cell wasn't working on campus.  i gave him a
call today to find out how we missed eachother.


Sara,

The confirms pulled in under an ENA Master Agreement (dated 9/1/94), not
under an
ISDA Master Agreement, as Tanya was mentioning.

I looked in the Financial Trading Agreements database and confirmed the ENA
Master.

After you've incorporated the changes, please send them back to me, because
Derek is has to send them to George for his review, and then I'll fax them
out:


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 03/18/2001 08:01 PM -----

	eserver@enron.com
	03/16/2001 08:31 AM

		 To: "Steven.J.Kean@enron.com" <Steven.J.Kean@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: <<Concur Expense Document>> - February 2001-CR

The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: Kelly L. Kimberly
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: February 2001-CR
Report Total: $2,475.53
Amount Due Employee: $2,475.53

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur
Expense.
http://nahou-wwxms01p


attached are communications materials related to PGE's settlement of Trojan
cost recovery issues.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron on 08/11/2000
06:55 PM ---------------------------
From: Mark Fryburg/ENRON@Gateway on 08/11/2000 03:11 PM
To: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Pamela Lesh/ENRON@Gateway, Randy
Dahlgren/ENRON@Gateway, Ron W JOHNSON/ENRON@Gateway, Carol
Dillin/ENRON@Gateway, FRED MILLER/ENRON@Gateway, Gail Baker/ENRON@Gateway
cc: Kregg Arntson/ENRON@Gateway, Patrick Stupek/ENRON@Gateway

Subject: Trojan Settlement Media Materials

For your review, I've attached all the draft external publications we're
preparing related to the Trojan Cost Recovery Settlement.

- Key Messages (power point)
- News Release
- Media Facts - Q & A

As we may have an announcement early next week, it would be greatly
appreciated if I could receive your feedback today.

(An internal  only "Issues and Perspective" is also being prepared.)

Many thanks,

- Mark


12/28/00

Time    Location Call In #  Pass Code

10:00 Central Standard Time  EB 2868  1-800-713-8600  80435

This is a recurring daily meeting until further notice  (this invitation will
schedule your calendar through 1/31/01).

Time, Call In #, and Pass Code are the same for all meetings.  Conference
room location will be changed as soon as possible to better accommodate the
participants.

Note:  Optional Invitees FYI Only

Please call me if you have any questions

Leticia

x-58752


There are five CNG postings listed below.

Posting #1
APPALACHIAN PRODUCER NOTICE

POSTED May 23, 2000

Dear West Virginia Producer,

Over the last several years, Dominion Transmission has worked hard providing
additional value to producers on its gathering system and through innovative
projects and joint ventures.  In continuing with that process to bring you
more value for your local production and to improve the efficiency of our
gathering system, we would like to continue a process where compression
into our gathering system may be approved.  We have been able to grant a
limited number of these requests in the past, and would now like to make
this opportunity somewhat more widely available to the producers.

For this second offering, the process we will use is as follows:  For a
period of 30 days, beginning 12:00 Noon on May 24, 2000, the Gathering and
Production Division of Dominion Transmission will accept applications for
compression rights into its gathering system for gas feeding its SCHUTTE
compressor station.  The Dominion "bubbles" affected are 4404 & 4405.
Dominion recognizes that, although limited, there does exist the incremental
capacity for throughput through these compressor stations.  The incremental
capacity authorized through new compression agreements will not exceed the
limit Dominion determines to be the capacity of the existing compressors.
Dominion will attempt to be flexible in approving the applications it
receives, but will limit approved applications so as to not unreasonably
interfere with the production from the existing non-compressed gas entering
the system.  Please submit your written application to Joe Thompson at the
Dominion Gathering & Production Office.  The application must indicate the
amount of "incremental" gas for the specific compression agreement.
Dominion recognizes that the installation of compression requires differing
time frames.  We will balance that consideration with our need to insure
that the application process is not abused to the disadvantage of other
producers; therefore, once granted, the applicant must have the compression
in place and operable within six months of Dominion's approval, or the rights
to all unconstructed capacity will be forfeited.  In the event that more
requests for compression rights for incremental gas are received than for
which there is capacity, Dominion will award the rights on a prorated basis.

Please include in your written request the mid number or a map of the
proposed
location where you will be requesting to install compression.  Also include
the incremental volume you are wishing to transport under the compression
agreement.  Your name, company name and address, state of incorporation,
phone and fax number, as well as an e-mail address, if available, should
be included (please print or type).

Forward this information to:
    Joseph A. Thompson
    Manager, Business Development
    Dominion Transmission
Gathering & Production Division
    500 Davisson Run Road
    Clarksburg, WV  26301

After all requests are received, we will review the request and make a
determination on granting compression based on capacity available and the
capacity requests.  You will be contacted as soon as possible after
June 23, 2000 to notify you of those requests that have been approved.
Please realize that this is a "window" and the opportunity will close
after Noon on June 23, 2000.

I hope that this will provide opportunity for you to increase the value
of your production facilities, and I look forward to working with you on
this opportunity to add compression.  You can contact Joe Thompson at
(304) 623-8709 or Dan Stuart at (304) 623-8705 with any questions you may
have regarding this compression  "open season" request on Dominion Gathering.

Sincerely,
H. Dale Rexrode
Director, Producer Services & Business Development

Posting #2
APPALACHIAN PRODUCER NOTICE

POSTED May 23, 2000

Dear West Virginia Producer,

Over the last several years, Dominion Transmission has worked hard providing
additional value to producers on its gathering system and through innovative
projects and joint ventures.  In continuing with that process to bring you
more value for your local production and to improve the efficiency of our
gathering system, we would like to continue a process where compression
into our gathering system may be approved.  We have been able to grant a
limited number of these requests in the past, and would now like to make
this opportunity somewhat more widely available to the producers.

For this second offering, the process we will use is as follows:  For a
period of 30 days, beginning 12:00 Noon on May 24, 2000, the Gathering and
Production Division of Dominion Transmission will accept applications for
compression rights into its gathering system for gas feeding its SMITHBURG,
COLLINS, MAXWELL AND NEW OXFORD  compressor stations.  The Dominion "bubbles"
affected are 4401, 4403, 4413.   Dominion recognizes that, although very
limited, there does exist the incremental capacity for throughput through
these compressor stations.  The incremental capacity authorized through new
compression agreements will not exceed the limit Dominion determines to be
the capacity of the existing compressors.  Dominion will attempt to be
flexible
in approving the applications it receives, but will limit approved
applications
so as to not unreasonably interfere with the production from the existing
non-compressed gas entering the system.  Please submit your written
application
to Joe Thompson at the Dominion Gathering & Production Office.  The
application
must indicate the amount of "incremental" gas for the specific compression
agreement.  Dominion recognizes that the installation of compression requires
differing time frames.  We will balance that consideration with our need to
insure that the application process is not abused to the disadvantage of
other
producers; therefore, once granted, the applicant must have the compression
in
place and operable within six months of Dominion's approval, or the rights to
all unconstructed capacity will be forfeited.  In the event that more
requests
for compression rights for incremental gas are received than for which there
is
capacity, Dominion will award the rights on a prorated basis.

Please include in your written request the mid number or a map of the
proposed
location where you will be requesting to install compression.  Also include
the
incremental volume you are wishing to transport under the compression
agreement.  Your name, company name and address, state of incorporation,
phone and fax number, as well as an e-mail address, if available, should be
included (please print or type).

Forward this information to:
    Joseph A. Thompson
    Manager, Business Development
    Dominion Transmission
Gathering & Production Division
    500 Davisson Run Road
    Clarksburg, WV  26301

After all requests are received, we will review the request and make a
determination on granting compression based on capacity available and the
capacity requests.  You will be contacted as soon as possible after
June 23, 2000 to notify you of those requests that have been approved.
Please realize that this is a "window" and the opportunity will close
after Noon on June 23, 2000.

I hope that this will provide opportunity for you to increase the value of
your production facilities, and I look forward to working with you on this
opportunity to add compression.  You can contact Joe Thompson at
(304) 623-8709 or Dan Stuart at (304) 623-8705 with any questions you may
have regarding this compression  "open season" request on Dominion Gathering.

Sincerely,
H. Dale Rexrode
Director, Producer Services & Business
Development

Posting #3
APPALACHIAN PRODUCER NOTICE

POSTED May 23, 2000

Dear West Virginia Producer,

Over the last several years, Dominion Transmission has worked hard providing
additional value to producers on its gathering system and through innovative
projects and joint ventures.  In continuing with that process to bring you
more value for your local production and to improve the efficiency of our
gathering system, we would like to continue a process where compression into
our gathering system may be approved.  We have been able to grant a limited
number of these requests in the past, and would now like to make this
opportunity somewhat more widely available to the producers.

For this second offering, the process we will use is as follows:  For a
period of 30 days, beginning 12:00 Noon on May 24, 2000, the Gathering and
Production Division of Dominion Transmission will accept applications for
compression rights into its gathering system for gas feeding its CAMDEN
compressor station.  The Dominion "bubbles" affected are 3306, 3307, 3401,
3402, 3403, 3406, 3407, 3408 & 3409.   Dominion recognizes that, although
limited, there does exist the incremental capacity for throughput through
these compressor stations.  The incremental capacity authorized through
new compression agreements will not exceed the limit Dominion determines
to be the capacity of the existing compressors.  Dominion will attempt to
be flexible in approving the applications it receives, but will limit
approved
applications so as to not unreasonably interfere with the production from the
existing non-compressed gas entering the system.  Please submit your written
application to Joe Thompson at the Dominion Gathering & Production Office.
The application must indicate the amount of "incremental" gas for the
specific compression agreement.  Dominion recognizes that the installation
of compression requires differing time frames.  We will balance that
consideration with our need to insure that the application process is not
abused to the disadvantage of other producers; therefore, once granted,
the applicant must have the compression in place and operable within six
months of Dominion's approval, or the rights to all unconstructed capacity
will be forfeited.  In the event that more requests for compression rights
for incremental gas are received than for which there is capacity, Dominion
will award the rights on a prorated basis.

Please include in your written request the mid number or a map of the
proposed location where you will be requesting to install compression.
Also include the incremental volume you are wishing to transport under
the compression agreement.  Your name, company name and address, state
of incorporation, phone and fax number, as well as an e-mail address, if
available, should be included (please print or type).

Forward this information to:
    Joseph A. Thompson
    Manager, Business Development
    Dominion Transmission
Gathering & Production Division
    500 Davisson Run Road
    Clarksburg, WV  26301

After all requests are received, we will review the request and make a
determination on granting compression based on capacity available and the
capacity requests.  You will be contacted as soon as possible after
June 23, 2000 to notify you of those requests that have been approved.
Please realize that this is a "window" and the opportunity will close
after Noon on June 23, 2000.

I hope that this will provide opportunity for you to increase the value
of your production facilities, and I look forward to working with you on
this opportunity to add compression.  You can contact Joe Thompson at
(304) 623-8709 or Dan Stuart at (304) 623-8705 with any questions you may
have regarding this compression  "open season" request on Dominion Gathering.

Sincerely,
H. Dale Rexrode
Director, Producer Services & Business Development

Posting #4
                                          Posted May 9 ,2000 9:30 a.m.

Dear West Virginia Producer,

Over the last several years, Dominion Transmission has worked hard providing
additional value to producers on its gathering system and through innovative
projects and joint ventures.  In continuing with that process to bring you
more
value for your local production and to improve the efficiency of our gathering
system, we would like to continue a process where compression into our
gathering
system may be approved.  We have been able to grant a limited number of these
requests in the past, and would now like to make this opportunity somewhat
more
widely available to the producers.

For this second offering, the process we will use is as follows:
For a period of 30 days, beginning 12:00 Noon on May 10, 2000, the Gathering
and Production Division of Dominion Transmission will accept applications for
compression rights into its gathering system for gas feeding its JONES and
ORMA
compressor stations.  The Dominion "bubbles" affected are 3205, 3206 and 3207
for Jones station and 3201, 3202, 3203 and 3204 for Orma station.   Dominion
recognizes that, although limited, there does exist the incremental capacity
for throughput through these compressor stations.  The incremental capacity
authorized through new compression agreements will not exceed the limit
Dominion determines to be the capacity of the existing compressors.
Dominion will attempt to be flexible in approving the applications it
receives,
but will limit approved applications so as to not unreasonably interfere with
the production from the existing non-compressed gas entering the system.
Please submit your written application to Joe Thompson at the Dominion
Gathering & Production Office.  The application must indicate the amount of
"incremental" gas for the specific compression agreement.  Dominion
recognizes
that the installation of compression requires differing time frames.  We will
balance that consideration with our need to insure that the application
process
is not abused to the disadvantage of other producers; therefore, once granted,
the applicant must have the compression in place and operable within six
months
of Dominion's approval, or the rights to all unconstructed capacity will be
forfeited.  In the event that more requests for compression rights for
incremental gas are received than for which there is capacity, Dominion
will award the rights on a prorated basis.

Please include in your written request the mid number or a map of the
proposed location where you will be requesting to install compression.  Also
include the incremental volume you are wishing to transport under the
compression agreement.  Your name, company name and address, state of
incorporation, phone and fax number, as well as an e-mail address, if
available,
should be included (please print or type).

Forward this information to:
    Joseph A. Thompson
    Manager, Business Development
    Dominion Transmission
                                Gathering & Production Division
    500 Davisson Run Road
    Clarksburg, WV  26301

After all requests are received, we will review the request and make a
determination on granting compression based on capacity available and
the capacity requests.  You will be contacted as soon as possible after
June 12, 2000 to notify you of those requests that have been approved.
Please realize that this is a "window" and the opportunity will close after
Noon on June 12, 2000.

I hope that this will provide opportunity for you to increase the value of
your production facilities, and I look forward to working with you on this
opportunity to add compression.  You can contact Joe Thompson at
(304) 623-8709 or Dan Stuart at (304) 623-8705 with any questions you may have
regarding this compression  "open season" request on Dominion Gathering.

Since rely,
H. Dale Rexrode
Di rector, Producer Services & Business Development

Posting #5
                                                  Posted May 9, 2000 9:07 a.m.

 Dear West Virginia Producer,

Over the last several years, Dominion Transmission has worked hard providing
additional value to producers on its gathering system and
through innovative projects and joint ventures.  In continuing with
that process to bring you more value for your local production and to
improve the efficiency of our gathering system, we would like to continue a
process where compression into our gathering system may be approved.
We have been able to grant a limited number of these requests in the past,
and would now like to make this opportunity somewhat more widely available to
the producers.

For this second offering, the process we will use is as follows:
For a period of 30 days, beginning 12:00 Noon on May 10, 2000,
the Gathering and Production Division of Dominion Transmission will accept
applications for compression rights into its gathering system for gas
feeding the Barbour County High Pressure System.  The Dominion "bubble"
affected is 4205.   Dominion recognizes that, although limited, there does
exist the incremental capacity for throughput through these compressor
stations.
The incremental capacity authorized through new compression agreements
will not exceed the limit Dominion determines to be the capacity of the
pipeline system.  Dominion will attempt to be flexible in approving the
applications it receives, but will limit approved applications so as to not
unreasonably interfere with the production from the existing non-compressed
gas entering the system.  Please submit your written application to
Joe Thompson at the Dominion Gathering & Production Office.
The application must indicate the amount of "incremental" gas for the
specific compression agreement.  Dominion recognizes that the installation
of compression requires differing time frames.  We will balance that
consideration with our need to insure that the application process is
not abused to the disadvantage of other producers; therefore, once granted,
the applicant must have the compression in place and operable within
six months of Dominion's approval, or the rights to all unconstructed
capacity will be forfeited.  In the event that more requests for compression
rights for incremental gas are received than for which there is capacity,
Dominion will award the rights on a prorated basis.

Please include in your written request the mid number or a map of the
proposed location where you will be requesting to install compression.
Also include the incremental volume you are wishing to transport under
the compression agreement.  Your name, company name and address,
state of incorporation, phone and fax number, as well as an e-mail address,
if available, should be included (please print or type).

Forward this information to:
    Joseph A. Thompson
    Manager, Business Development
    Dominion Transmission
                                Gathering & Production Division
    500 Davisson Run Road
    Clarksburg, WV  26301

After all requests are received, we will review the request and make a
determination on granting compression based on capacity available and the
capacity requests.  You will be contacted as soon as possible after June 12,
2000
to notify you of those requests that have been approved.  Please realize that
this is a "window" and the opportunity will close after Noon on June 12, 2000.

I hope that this will provide opportunity for you to increase the value
of your production facilities, and I look forward to working with you on this
opportunity to add compression.  You can contact Joe Thompson at (304)
623-8709
or Dan Stuart at (304) 623-8705 with any questions you may have regarding
this compression  "open season" request on Dominion Gathering.

Sincerely,
H. Dale Rexrode
Director, Producer Services & Business Development


David: I thank you. You cannot imagine how appreciated this is. The changes
come so fast at Enron that unless you are associated with the organization
concerned, it's impossible to get timely information into the hands of those
in positions of responsibility. Joe


What people know:

Hertzberg (et al's) bill (82XX)was heard in an "informational" hearing today
and still sits in the Assembly Energy Committee.  It will be heard again
tomorrow (perhaps beginning at 10 AM) , at which time parties will have a
chance to support/oppose and ask for amendments.  Most, including us, oppose
unless significantly amended.
The Wright (D) -Richman (R) bill (83XX)was heard in an "informational"
hearing today and still sits in the Assembly Energy Committee.  It will be
heard again tomorrow, at which time parties will have a chance to
support/oppose and ask for amendments.  From our perspective, this is the
best bill out there yet, though it still has serious problems---it isn't
available electronically yet, but should be tomorrow, and I'll distribute
then.  The chances of the joint D-R bill being successful are slim, however,
since it's up against the Speakers competing bill.  There is talk that the
Speaker will try to negotiate with Wright/Richman tonight and include any
agreement in his bill (82XX).
The original version of the Governor's MOU bill sits in the Senate.  Most
believe that Burton will put it up for a vote this week and it will fail.
The Senate's version of the MOU (Sher-Peace-Kuehl) (78XX)came out today.  It
will likely be heard in the committee tomorrow or the next day.  Notably, it
kills Direct Access completely and makes Edison shareholders responsible for
that portion of Edison's debt owed to suppliers.  In short, a very bad bill.
Burton's 18XX, which would de-link the bond issuance (to pay back the General
Fund) from the DWR contracts is likely to pass the Senate tomorrow or the
next day.  Many--including Enron--support the bill (though we are supporting
it behind the scenes).

What people don't know:
Whether there's the time or the will in the Assembly and Senate to achieve by
Friday a single, comprehensive bill that can be sent to the governor for his
signature.
Whether the Legislature would postpone its month-long recess if the
Legislature hasn't finished a bill by Friday (most folks think they will not
postpone).
Whether it's true that, irrespective of the energy issue, the Legislature
will fail to get the budget completed by Friday and therefore have to
postpone their recess anyway, in which case they might continue to work on
the energy legislation at the same time.

Odds-makers still say it's better than 50-50 that the Legislature does not
get the Edison bills done by Friday and leaves on on its 30-day vacation.

Best,
Jeff

Sacramento is one goofy place.


Wicek,

wyslalem ci nasza ksiazke razem z kilkoma pracami
matematyczno/finansowo/energetycznymi i dwa egzemplarze Rynku Terminowego,
w ktorym od 2000 roku jest dzial poswiecony rynkowi energii (jego
redaktorem jest Alek). Mam nadzieje, ze to Cie zainteresuje.
Ksiazka jest zainteresowany Cambridge University Press i w tej chwili jest
recenzowany draft angielskiej wersji (mozesz do sciagnac ze strony:
http://www.im.pwr.wroc.pl/~rweron/gene.html). Angielski jest jeszcze
slaby (tlumaczyla moja studentka), ale da sie czytac. W ostatecznej wersji
planujemy pare zmian. Jakbys mial czas to przegladnij ksiazke, wszelkie
uwagi bardzo mile widziane.

Rafal


Is there anything we can tell them about the rates they should expect from
the utility?  I think that will be the biggest concern and we can reduce
backlash if we can provide them some information.

Peggy Mahoney@EES
05/22/2001 06:37 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Max Eberts/HOU/EES@EES, Elizabeth
Ivers/Enron@EnronXGate, Mark Koenig/Enron@EnronXGate, Paula
Rieker/Enron@EnronXGate, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES,
Elizabeth Tilney/HOU/EES@EES, Diann Huddleson/HOU/EES@EES, Janet R
Dietrich/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, David W Delainey/HOU/EES@EES, Don
Black/HOU/EES@EES, Mark S Muller/HOU/EES@EES, Kenneth Lay/Enron@EnronXGate,
Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES
cc:

Subject: Letter to residential customers

Attached is a draft of the letter we'd like to send to our 16,000 residential
customers on Friday.  Please
review and let me know your comments by 12 noon on Wednesday.


Samantha Boyd can be reached by the following:

281-893-8693 (unlisted)

12315 Wilde Laurel Ln
Houston, TX 77014

If anyone should need ANY assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at
x5-3317.  Thank you for your attention to this matter.


I understand Greg Penman has inquired for the same.  I would be happy to
coordinate amongst us and informed Greg accordingly.

Thank you
Molly

Molly Harris
08/18/2000 01:58 PM
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: ENA ISDA with PEC

Tana

Is it possible to get electronic file for the Enron North America and Peoples
Energy Corporation ISDA?  Is it in Word?  I am trying to get our new JV,
Midwest Energy Hub, to utilize our format for the template for MEH.

Thanks
Molly

a.huprikar@pecorp.com on 08/17/2000 03:48:36 PM
To: molly.harris@enron.com
cc:
Subject: ENA ISDA with PEC

Molly,

Could you send me an electronic version of the ISDA that was signed between
ENA and PEC. I understand from our attorney that we did not work with an
electronic version, only a hard copy. In order to create an ISDA template
for MEH, I need the electronic version.

Thanks

Aparna

----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person
or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential
and/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in
reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient is prohibited.   If you received this in error, please
contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.


568843 - added fee of .0275, but Sean Crandall believes price should stay at
300.00

569178 - changed broker from APB to Prebon

569021 - changed broker from APB to Bloomberg

569270 - changed broker from APB to Amerex

Stephanie Piwetz   04/03/2001 02:05 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Checkout 4/3/01

Kate, please check
APB showed
Diana Scholtes
568843.01   price 302.00  (and doesn't fee have .0275)

Apb did not show  Richter deal 569178.01

and Tom Alonso deal 569021.01 (apb only shows one trade 568998.01)
569021.01 >bloomberg, we received a broker confirm.

Sean Crandall 569270.01  apb no show

Thanks


Approved

Vince Kaminski

"ECTHOU-DOMWEB1" <ECTHOU-DOMWEB1@enron.com> on 03/31/2000 09:38:08 AM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Class Request: XL97CHART-574 Excel 97, Charting, William Smith

Your approval is required for William Smith to attend the following class.
To grant approval, send a reply to "lpharr@enron.com" (NotesMail: LeRea
Pharr/HOU/ECT@ECT).
  Be sure to include employee's name and class number in reply.

Excel 97, Charting
Session Dates & Times:
  4/21/2000  8:30:00 AM-11:30:00 AM
Location: EB572
No Show/Participant Fee: $ 110.00

If you have any questions, please call the Technology Training Coordinator at
713-853-1816.


Jeff,

Jim wanted me to forward this to you.

Lucy Marshall
Office of the Chairman
Enron Broadband Services
Office 713-853-4525
Fax     713-345-7864
Cell     713-417-7802
lucy_marshall@enron.net

----- Forwarded by Lucy Marshall/Enron Communications on 07/11/01 06:04 PM -----

	Jim Fallon Sent by: Lucy Marshall 07/11/01 05:48 PM 	   To: Ken Rice/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Jim Fallon/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, David Cox/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Marla Barnard/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Frank Bay/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Fred Cohagan/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Richard DiMichele/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Wade Doshier/Enron Communications, Anthony Duenner/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, John Echols/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Rick Fehl/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Mike Golden/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Kevin Howard/Enron Communications, Kelly Kimberly/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Phillip Lord/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Kristina Mordaunt/Enron Communications, Edward Ondarza/Enron Communications, Barry Pearce/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Everett Plante/Enron Communications, Paul Racicot/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Marcello Romano/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Matthew Scrimshaw/Enron@EUEnronXGate, Stewart Seeligson/Enron Communications, Dale Surbey/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Ricky Waddell/Enron Communications@Enron Communications  cc:   Subject: Bullet Points

All,

Attached are the key messages that we ask you to use when meeting with your employees tomorrow.

If you have any questions, please feel free to give me a call.

Regards,
Jim

===============================================================

Office 713-853-3354
Fax 713-345-7864
Cellular 713-898-8611
Pager 877-946-2395 (skytel)


I've included a total return to shareholder slide at the beginning the
presentation.  Comparing Enron to the S&P 500, it shows returns for one, five
and 10 years (taken from the Investor Conference slides).  The one below
covers a broader comparison, which helps to make our case, right?

Margaret Carson
02/15/2001 10:17 AM
To: Mary Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rob Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John
Neslage/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: ENE RETURN TO SHAREHOLDERS

Mary  Hope  this  is helpful..    regards   Margaret


thats good , he is getting better
this plane crash is crazy in new york
give me a call when you get a chance just to say hi

dq

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Quigley, Kay
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 9:22 AM
To:	Quigley, Dutch
Subject:	RE: good morning

only for 10 minutes

From:	Dutch Quigley/ENRON@enronXgate on 11/12/2001 09:08 AM
To:	Kay Quigley/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject:	RE: good morning

did he bark much when i left

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Quigley, Kay
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 9:06 AM
To:	Quigley, Dutch
Subject:	Re: good morning

ILY TOO- I hope little Rex is okay- I will go at lunch and check on him

From:	Dutch Quigley/ENRON@enronXgate on 11/12/2001 08:43 AM
To:	Kay Quigley/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject:	good morning

Good morning,

I LOVE YOU KAY

dq


Jolene Skinner
821 Oskaloosa St
Pella, IA 50219
skinnerj@central.edu

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Jolene Skinner


FYI, from my phone message this morning, here is the operative provision from
the Koch PSA.  SWD
----- Forwarded by Steve Duffy/Houston/Eott on 07/07/2000 03:21 PM -----

	"Baird, Bob" <RBaird@velaw.com>
	07/07/2000 11:45 AM

		 To: Dana Gibbs/Houston/Eott@Eott
		 cc: Lori Maddox/Houston/Eott@Eott, Steve Duffy/Houston/Eott@Eott
		 Subject: Language in registration rights agreement wiht Koch relating to r
ight to delay filing

"and provided further, that if the General Partner determines in its good
faith judgment that a postponement for up to four months of the filing or
effectiveness of the requested registration or the sales pursuant to an
effective registration would be in the best interests of EEP and its
Partners due to a pending transaction, investigation or other event, the
filing or effectiveness of such registration statement or any sales pursuant
thereto may be deferred for up to four months, but not thereafter."

Robert S. Baird
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.
One American Center
600 Congress Avenue
Austin, Texas 78701-3200
Office phone: 512/495-8451
Fax: 512/236-3210
Home phone: 512/347-8065
Car phone: 512/627-8065
Pager: 1-888-487-2651
Voice mail: 512/495-8696, x8451
Internet: rbaird@velaw.com


Hello, Steve!   Thanks for the alert!    I did just call the Pro Shop one
more time and spoke with a young lady by the name of Ashley, and she confirms
that you guys are slated to tee off on Sunday at 8:15AM on the Old Course off
#1.

Hit  'em straight!

Cindy

"DFS International, Inc." <dfsintl@swbell.net> on 05/24/2001 01:43:44 PM
To: Stanley.Horton@enron.com
cc:

Subject: RE: Sunday Golf at Rav

Thank you Cindy!   I check with Raveneaux this morning as I was already
there.  The Pro Shop said there was no tee time for Horton.   I am sure they
just over looked it.  Just in case however,  I reserved a 9:45 am on the New
Course as a backup.  You may want to double check with the Pro Shop.  Thank
you again.  Please meeting you via e-mail.

Best regards.
Steve Westlund


The pre-enrollment process for the Enron Kids' Center is underway and ends
Friday, March 30, 2001.  Enrollment packages can be picked-up at the HR Kiosk
between 11:00 AM and 2:00 PM or call Cynthia Vasquez at  X3.1726.

Our childcare center will be located on Louisiana Street across from our
corporate headquarters.  The anticipated opening date is fall 2001.  Any
eligible full-time or part-time Enron employee who will have a child/children
between the ages of six weeks and four years by the opening date of the
center will be eligible to utilize the center.

Please go to http://home.enron.com:84/messaging/ekidctr.pdf to learn more
about Enron,s onsite child care center.  If you still have questions or
concerns, please contact Knowledge Beginnings at 1-877-244-5346 (between 8:00
am - 5:00 p.m. PST) or visit their web site at www.knowledgebeginnings.com .
Enron is excited about the plans for the Enron Kids, Center and we look
forward to the grand opening!


Another Fort Pierce memo.

K-
---------------------- Forwarded by Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron on 05/16/2001
04:57 PM ---------------------------

Barton Clark@ECT
05/16/2001 04:54 PM
To: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Rusty Stevens/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron, Lisa
Bills/Enron@EnronXGate, Roseann Engeldorf/Enron@EnronXGate

Subject: Ft. Pierce Attached Files

I sent you and Kathleen the memo I sent to Rusty about confidentiality
provisions in the FPUA/FPRP project documents.

In regard to disclosure on Deal Bench, I think you  need to consider
carefully the confidentiality restrictions in place under binding agreements
that restrict ENA's ability to disclose contracts and other information and
the need to keep certain of the attachments to the E-Mail that Rusty sent you
confidential.

There are binding confidentiality provisions in place with almost every
counterparty to the executed and proposed to be executed Fort Pierce project
documents, some with exceptions that would permit disclosure to potential
assignees/transferees, some without such exceptions. A systematic review of
the confidentiality provisions in force to ascertain the scope of the
confidentiality restrictions needs to be completed before Deal Bench
disclosure, and to my knowledge that has not taken place. Also be advised
that the Fort Pierce Development Agreements are not negotiated to finality or
signed, and I am concerned that such disclosure at this time - if FPUA
learned of it - could result in the deal never being signed and/or a
potential purchaser being misled about the terms of the FPUA/FPRP
transaction.

Apart from the foregoing considerations, I have asked that the opinions and
certificates attached to the E-Mail Rusty forwarded to you be kept strictly
confidential. They will change, and there are matters in the certificates
that we don't want advertised to FPUA, on Deal Bench, or otherwise.

Finally, I am not aware of the scope of ENA's confidentiality obligations in
cases when it is negotiating documents in its capacity as agent for E-Next
Generation LLC. By copy hereof, I'm requesting Lisa Bills and Rose Engeldorf
advise us if there are such restrictions that would limit disclosure to
potential purchasers independent of the other confidentiality restrictions
referred to above.

In short, before any documents are disclosed to third parties via Deal Bench,
these matters need to be resolved, and I frankly am too busy right now trying
to get the deal with FPUA signed to make the review my priority. Perhaps we
should start by having Kathleen take a look at the provisions in the various
executed FPRP documents to catalog the various restrictions applicable to the
proposed Deal Bench disclosure?

----- Forwarded by Barton Clark/HOU/ECT on 05/16/2001 03:32 PM -----

	Rusty Stevens@ENRON
	05/16/2001 12:15 PM

		 To: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barton Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ron
Tapscott/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Ft. Pierce Attached Files

Attached below are the latest docs. on Fort Pierce.  Please note that we are
still awaiting some final comments from FPUA's attorney and Turbopark, but
these should be very close to final form.  We should have all comments back
and be in final form in a week to ten days if you want to wait to put the
docs. into Deal bench.

Bart sent this e-mail out in response to Lisa Bill's request for a
comprehensive list of all documents.  I think the only document missing is
the FMPA steam agreement where we can use their units on an interruptible
basis when they are not using them.  Please note that some of the documents
are not for parties outside of Enron are confidential legal opinions.

---------------------- Forwarded by Rusty Stevens/Corp/Enron on 05/16/2001
12:07 PM ---------------------------

Barton Clark@ECT
05/15/2001 06:45 PM
To: Lisa Bills/Enron@EnronXGate, Roseann Engeldorf/Enron@EnronXGate, Herman
Manis/Enron@EnronXGate, Catherine Clark/Enron@EnronXGate
cc: David Fairley/Enron@EnronXGate, Mathew Gimble/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer
Bagwell/Enron@EnronXGate, Rusty Stevens/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeffrey
Keenan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Coleman/Enron@EnronXGate, Scott
Churbock/NA/Enron@ENRON, tculwell@akllp.com

Subject: Ft. Pierce Attached Files

As requested today, attached are the latest drafts of the FPUA/FPRP
Development Agreements to be executed by FPUA and FPRP and the Tax and
Aesthetics Agreements to be executed by the City of Fort Pierce and FPRP  (
to be delivered to FPRP at the execution of the other Development Agreements
by FPUA). It may be helpful to open the Execution Date Deliveries document
first to give you a checklist of the documents, and a rundown on permits. If
you need an update on permitting, I will have to ask Scott and Jeffrey to
help with that discussion. Note that the Equipment Lease for the chillers,
the Equipment Lease for the cooling towers, and the Option to Lease for the
cooling tower site ( and the Ground Lease, which will be appended to the
Option to Lease) are in the process of being drafted now, and I will
distribute them as soon as they are ready. DO NOT DISTRIBUTE THIS MEMO OR THE
ATTACHED MEMO FROM A & k TO FPUA OR ANYONE OUTSIDE ENRON, AS THE CERTIFICATES
TO BE DELIVERED IN CONNECTION WITH THE OPINIONS ARE STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL TO
FPRP/ENRON.

In connection with our meeting Friday, a couple of other points worth noting
are (1) Section 9.2 (c) of the Participation Agreement, added as a
placeholder when the thought was to have a dump condenser and when its
location was unknown,will be deleted, (2) references in Exhibits D and E to
the dump condenser/system will be removed, references in Exhibit  D
describing the FPRP Improvements will add references to the cooling tower and
chillers, and references in Exhibit E to the demin system will remain.

There are additional comments received from FPUA and its insurance
consultants after preparation of the attached draft of the Participation
Agreement , all of which have been blessed by David Marshall, that will be
addressed in the next draft.

We also know that the legal description and plot plan of the leased parcel in
the Ground Lease will change to reflect the extension of the parcel 30' to
the east, certain easements in favor of FPUA and FPRP described in the Ground
Lease and the Easement Agreement will be affected by the extension,and we
should have those descriptions and plans for the lease parcel description and
affected easements tomorrow.

We also have internal input from David Fairley ( Interconnection &
Transmission), Mike Coleman ( Section 3.12, O & M, Annual Heat Rate Test ),
Jeffrey Keenan ( Tolling and Interconnection & Transmission Agreement), and
Rusty/Ron Tapscott ( Section 9.3, Participation Agreement, Transmission
Upgrades Responsibilities) that needs to be reflected.

Finally, note that the proposed FPRP and ENA legal opinion, and related FPRP
Certificate, is being discussed by Rose with E-Next counsel, and we
understand those documents will change based on those discussions.

As noted today, FPUA will give us its comments on the documents delivered to
them on 5/9 this Friday, but we don't expect those comments to be material.
We also don't expect there to be much discussion about the items noted above
to be added to the last drafts seen by FPUA, except possible with respect to
the Equipment Leases and Option to Lease, which will be new documents they
have to review.
----- Forwarded by Barton Clark/HOU/ECT on 05/15/2001 06:06 PM -----

	"Zimmerman, Gina" <ginazimmerman@akllp.com>
	05/15/2001 04:59 PM

		 To: <barton.clark@enron.com>
		 cc: "Culwell, Todd" <toddculwell@akllp.com>
		 Subject: Ft. Pierce Attached Files

Bart,

Attached is the revised Execution Date Deliveries Chart and the most
recent versions of all A&K draft documents as indicated on the chart.

Please advise if I may be of further assistance.

Sincerely,

Gina G. Zimmerman
Legal Secretary
Andrews & Kurth L.L.P.
4200 Chase Tower
600 Travis
Houston, Texas  77002
713-220-4460
713-220-7273 (Fax)
ginazimmerman@akllp.com

The information contained in this e-mail is legally privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the recipient(s)
named above.  If the reader of this e-mail is not an intended recipient,
you have received this e-mail in error and any review, dissemination,
distribution or copying is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by return
e-mail and permanently delete the copy you received.

Thank you.
 <<Ad Valorem Tax Agreement.DOC>>  <<Aesthetic Agreement.DOC>>
<<Affidavit of Ownership.DOC>>  <<Certification from FPRP to Katz
Kutter.DOC>>  <<Certification from FPUA to Katz Kutter.DOC>>  <<Easement
Agreement (comprehensive).DOC>>  <<Execution Date Deliveries.DOC>>
<<FPRP Managing Member Certificate.DOC>>  <<Ground Lease.DOC>>
<<Interconnection and Transmission Agreement.DOC>>  <<Operation and
Maintenance Agreement - Version 22.DOC>>  <<Opinion of Counsel to City
of Ft. Pierce.DOC>>  <<Opinion of ENA & FPRP.DOC>>  <<Opinion of Fee,
Koblegard.DOC>>  <<Opinion of Katz Kutter.DOC>>  <<Short Form Ground
Lease.DOC>>  <<Tolling Agreement - v. 21.DOC>>  <<v10 Participation
Agreement (NEW).DOC>>
 - Ad Valorem Tax Agreement.DOC
 - Aesthetic Agreement.DOC
 - Affidavit of Ownership.DOC
 - Certification from FPRP to Katz Kutter.DOC
 - Certification from FPUA to Katz Kutter.DOC
 - Easement Agreement (comprehensive).DOC
 - Execution Date Deliveries.DOC
 - FPRP Managing Member Certificate.DOC
 - Ground Lease.DOC
 - Interconnection and Transmission Agreement.DOC
 - Operation and Maintenance Agreement - Version 22.DOC
 - Opinion of Counsel to City of Ft. Pierce.DOC
 - Opinion of ENA & FPRP.DOC
 - Opinion of Fee, Koblegard.DOC
 - Opinion of Katz Kutter.DOC
 - Short Form Ground Lease.DOC
 - Tolling Agreement - v. 21.DOC
 - v10 Participation Agreement (NEW).DOC


John,

You are correct, when you compute the historical volatility you need to use 252 days to annualize the volatility.
This is because the historical data only existed for trading days.

The common practice here at Enron for computing Time to maturity is Calendar Days (= Maturity date - valuation date).
Therefore the days in Year is 365.25.  So the implied volatility from the EIMPVOL function uses 365.25 days as one year.

If you want to convert you can apply the following formula

historical vol * sqrt(252)    vs.  implied vol * sqrt(365.25).

Let me know if this helps.

Zimin

John Griffith@ENRON
05/03/2001 03:31 PM
To:	Zimin Lu/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:	Paulo Issler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Maggi/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject:	Historical Volatility

Zimin,

I have a question about historical volatility.  The way I have been calculating historical volatility is that I take the standard deviation of the log returns of the price settles.  I then take that number (daily volatility) and multiply by the square root of the number of trading days to come up with an annualized volatility.  The number of trading days that I have been using is 252, however I do not know if this is correct.  What I am trying to do is calculate a historical volatility that would be comparable to the implied volatility that we are calculating our books with.  The implied volatilities are iterated using the euro function.  I get a straddle quote and I iterate what volatility would be used to come up with that price ( I also look at the eimvol function).  I know that we use a 365.25 trading day convention in pricing our options, does this mean that to come up with a comparable historical volatility number I need to use 365.25 to convert the daily historical volatility to an annualized volatility?

Thanks again for your help.

John Griffith


*  from Govt Affairs

> Governor Gray Davis held a well-attended press conference at the Capitol
> today to discuss his reaction to President Bush's energy plan.  In reading
> his prepared statements, Davis spoke as if directly to President Bush and
> FERC.  Davis later answered questions from reporters.
>
> The Governor began the press conference by saying he commended the
> President for "facing up to America's energy crisis."  However, he added,
> "I fault the President for not providing immediate relief for
> California...[which is] in a war with price-gouging energy companies--many
> of them are in Texas."  Davis said that the President needs to be "more
> creative" in his solutions to the energy crisis.
>
> Davis also applauded the President's focus on conservation in his energy
> plan.  Davis said, "[California has] $850 million worth of incentives for
> individuals and businesses...to adopt energy-saving measures in their
> homes and businesses."  He added that California is the number one state
> in per capita energy conservation.
>
> Davis said he had joined with the governors of Oregon and Washington on
> calling for temporary price caps for the Western states.  He explained
> that "Texas earlier this year adopted a temporary form of price relief,"
> and asked why California couldn't do the same.  Davis also said one of the
> incoming FERC commissioners is the former head of the Texas PUC, "so there
> has to be a way that California can get temporary price relief."
>
> Davis said of President Bush, "by not doing anything, you are allowing the
> price-gouging energy suppliers to get away with murder."
>
> On the subject of FERC's recent ruling on QFs, Davis said, "it appears to
> give California relief...but is another Trojan horse." He explained, "FERC
> refused to order the contracts be broken...but the effect that will be
> caused allowing them to re-sell the power if they're relieved of the
> obligation to provide it to utilities is that Californians will have to
> pay [for QF power] on the spot market."  Davis said that FERC was "giving
> with one hand and taking away with the other."  He added, "If [FERC]
> can't give us price relief, just go home."
>
> One suggestion Davis gave for FERC being more creative was to "take a much
> more aggressive approach in ordering..massive, 50% refunds to taxpayers."
> Davis added that "this is an idea I've discussed with [Bush FERC nominee]
> Pat Wood of the Energy Commission."
>
> Davis urged the President to work with FERC to help California saying,
> "The President didn't create this problem, but is the only one who can
> instruct his appointees"
>
> He added, "I told the generators face-to-face, your fate is in your
> hands."  He added, "I said to them: If you don't work with me this summer,
> I will sign a windfall profits tax!"
>
> In response to a question on the merits of federal preemption vs. States'
> rights and eminent domain for power plants and power lines, Davis
> reponded, "I'm going to duck that question."  He added, "here's why: the
> federal government...on the big issues, has been distinctly unhelpful."
> Davis said he was "inclined to say that more federal power" in this matter
> would not help the situation.
>
> In response to a question on the viability of deregulation, Davis said,
> "In fairness, we don't have true deregulation in this state--I am trying
> to make something work that is unworkable."  He added, "deregulation is
> not a religion, it's a theory."  Davis said, "according to Allen
> Greenspan, deregulation only works if there is 15% supply above demand"
> and this is not the case in California.
>
> Davis criticized the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and said,
> "Everyone on that commission has forgotten that third word
> "Regulatory"--they found out the prices are unjust and unreasonable and
> did nothing."
>
> In response to a reporter's question on whether Davis believes President
> Bush will come through for California, Davis responded, "I believe the
> President may well in the end do the right thing for Californians...I
> believe he will be creative in his solutions."
>


Jerry,
Please see the attached:

JMF


the most recent rejection from murphy!!
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

 - married.bmp