----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 11/17/2000 10:19 AM -----

	"Meringolo, Peter" <PMeringolo@brobeck.com>
	11/16/2000 03:27 PM

		 To: "'Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com'" <Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com>,
"'msmith1@enron.com'" <msmith1@enron.com>, "'Mary.Hain@enron.com'"
<Mary.Hain@enron.com>, "'David_Aamodt@pgn.com'" <David_Aamodt@pgn.com>,
"'Christian.Yoder@enron.com'" <Christian.Yoder@enron.com>, "'mday@gmssr.com'"
<mday@gmssr.com>, "Fergus, Gary S." <GFergus@brobeck.com>, "Stephen C. Hall
(E-mail)" <schall@stoel.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Draft letter to the CPUC

Please let either Gary or me know your thoughts and comments regarding the
below draft letter to the CPUC.

Thanks,

Peter

> PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
> ATTORNEY CLIENT COMMUNICATION
> ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT
>
>
>
> Harvey Morris Esq.
> California Public Utilities Commission
> 505 Public Utilities Commission
> San Francisco, California   94102
>
>  Re:   I.00-08-002  Subpoenas Served on Enron Power Marketing, Inc.
> ("EPMI"), Enron Energy Services Operations Inc. and Enron Energy Services
> Inc. (collectively referred to as "EES"), Enron Energy Marketing
> Corporation ("EEMC"), and Portland General Electric Corporation ("Portland
> General")(collectively sometimes referred to as the "Enron Entities")
>
> Harvey,
>
>  I am writing in response to the various voicemail exchanges and
> phone calls between Michael Day, on behalf of the Enron Entities, and
> yourself during the past few weeks.  Here is the current status as we
> understand it.  Based upon the agreements we reached between October 6,
> 2000 and October 18, 2000 (date of your confirming email) the Enron
> Entities have made the following document productions in response to the
> subpoenas served by California Public Utilities Commission (the
> "Commission"):
>
> * October 13, 2000  Bate Nos. Enron Entities 000001-000025 on behalf
> of all Enron Entities Responsive to Request Nos. 1-11, 20.
>
> * October 27, 2000 Bate Nos. P000001-002115 on behalf of Portland
> General Responsive to Request Nos. 12, 14, 16 and 18.
>
> * November 14, 2000 Bate No. Enron Entities 000026 (Diskette with
> EES/EEMC retail data) Responsive to Request Nos. 7 to 11, 13, 15 to 17,
> and 19.
>
> * November 15, 2000 Bate No. P002116-002117 (Diskettes with Portland
> General Data, which include approximate 355,000 wholesale transactions)
> Responsive to Request Nos. 7 to 11, 13 to 17, and 19.
>
> We believe with these productions, we have complied with the October
> 6-18th agreement with respect to Portland General and EES/EEMC.  As you
> know, these productions were all made reserving the Enron Entities rights
> to object or challenge the subpoenas and reserving any claims, defenses,
> objections, jurisdictional or otherwise, or other responses.
>
>  We originally had hoped to have all of the Transactional Data for
> EPMI, as defined in our October 6th email, available for production by
> October 27th.  However, we were also mindful of your expressed expectation
> that any data provided be useful and reliable.  The collection of data you
> requested in the subpoenas is neither kept electronically in the same
> location nor organized as you requested it.  In fact during our review of
> some of the data we found significant errors that called into question the
> methodology by which the data was extracted from existing information.
> When it became apparent that we could not accurately estimate how long it
> would take to get reliable data given the volume of transactions involved,
> we informed you of the problem.  We now understand that if we cannot give
> you a firm date when the balance of the Transactional Data will be
> available, the Commission believes it will have no choice but to seek to
> compel production before the Federal Regulatory Energy Commission
> ("FERC").  We understand the pressure that you must be under to get data
> immediately, but we cannot, at this time, give you another date in the
> immediate future by which we are certain that we will be able to produce
> accurate data.
>
>  Moreover, during the iterim between October 18th and today, a number
> of significant events have occurred that we believe bear on the subpoenas
> served on the Enron entities.  First, we understand that many other
> parties who were served with the same subpoenas have not provided the
> detailed information requested and have objected on a variety of very
> sound legal grounds.  Second, the Commission itself has, without a hearing
> on the motion, unilaterally revised the proposed protective order that is
> supposed to govern these productions and summarily denied other changes
> sought by other parties served.  Third, the Commission has filed its
> motion before FERC seeking an order compelling the production of the data
> from those other parties that have objected and seeking an expedited
> hearing and production schedule.  We note that the reasons stated in the
> motion before FERC as the basis for the production are materially
> different than the reasons originally stated in the ex parte application
> to the Commission's own Administrative Law Judge who issued the subpoenas.
> Finally, FERC itself has completed its investigation and has issued a
> tentative order as of November 1, 2000.
>
>  Originally, the Enron Entities had been prepared to accept "most
> favored nation" treatment with respect to protective orders and requests
> by others to limit the scope of the subpoenas and produce information that
> was available.  However, given both the Commission's stated urgent need
> for an immediate answer that EPMI cannot in good faith give despite
> substantial effort (date for production of reliable and accurate
> Transaction Data) and the uncertainty created by the above described
> intervening events, EPMI believes it has no choice but to serve its formal
> objections and responses to the subpoenas and await the Commission's
> threatened motion to compel before FERC.
>
>  We also understand from our discussions with you that the Commission
> has created various lists or categories for the entities that have been
> served with subpoenas.  We understand that there is a list for those
> entities that have been cooperating, a list for those who have been
> delaying and a list for those who have been objecting and exercising their
> rights to challenge the subpoenas.  We understand that the Commission
> intends to punish, by whatever means it has available, those entities that
> object and exercise their rights to challenge the subpoenas.  We deplore
> these tactics, but despite all of the efforts to cooperate described
> above, we understand that EPMI may in fact be moved from the cooperating
> list to the group to be punished for exercising its rights.
>
>  If you have and questions or comments, please do not hesitate to
> contact me.
>
>         Sincerely,
>
>
>
>         Gary S.
> Fergus

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com


True.


Please review the spreadsheet, and look at Daily Deals Graph.


Please forward any Profile Manager issues to Lisa or myself and we will
provide or find resolution for the issue.  Let me know if you have any
questions.

Thanks,
Stephanie x33465


Bryan,

I was mistaken - the updates have not actually occurred yet - but are likely
to be in very shortly (within the next day or two)

Dave
---------------------- Forwarded by David Forster/Corp/Enron on 06/07/2000
08:39 AM ---------------------------

David Forster
06/07/2000 07:40 AM
To: Bryan Seyfried/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Read Only Restrictions

Bryan,

As discussed previously, we have modified the customer profiles to allow read
only access to credit derivatives as a standard default for all customers.

We have not modified any criteria for execution access.

Dave


Please find attached the last version of the referenced document. Thanks for
your help.

Regards,

Andrea


This deal has an NP15 with firm energy.

Thanks!


In Memoriam

I'd like to take a moment to remember my first manager as a broker, Bill
Alexander of Legg Mason. Bill died last Sunday from complications related
to diabetes. Bill was a classic stock jocky, of the old school. In fact he
began in the business when the business was old school...a Gentlemen's
Club... back in the days before discount brokers. He knew how to read a
chart, buy momentum, and how to cut a loss short. He taught me a lot about
liquidity, and money flow, and technical analysis. He also taught me to
read the tape and trade off it. There weren't many like Bill. There weren't
many who were good enough to survive the new competitive environment. Bill
was. Not only did he survive, but he thrived.

Part of an era died on Sunday with Bill. He will be missed by me and by
hundreds of clients and friends.

Good bye, Bill.


your kids will end up on mulletsgalore


Notice No.  00-341
October 4, 2000

TO:
ALL COMEX DIVISION MEMBERS
ALL COMEX DIVISION MEMBER FIRMS
ALL COMEX DIVISION CLEARING MEMBERS

FROM: Neal Wolkoff, Executive Vice President

SUBJECT:Approved Amendment to Aluminum Futures Contract Rule 23.06
"Deliverable Metal Specifications"

The Exchange has received approval from the Commodity Futures Trading
Commission to amend COMEX Rule 23.06, "Deliverable Metal Specifications" of
the Aluminum Futures Contract.  The approved amendment to Section (B) Shapes
of Rule 23.06 increases the weight of the aluminum T-bars deliverable against
the Aluminum Futures Contract from fifteen hundred seventy-five (1,575)
pounds to seventeen hundred thirty-five (1,735) pounds.

The approved amendment is effective immediately.

A copy of the approved amendment is attached.  Capital letters indicate
additions; [ ] indicate deletions.

Should you have any questions or require any further information please
contact Albert J. Getz at 212-299-2608.

Aluminum Futures Contract

Approved Rule Amendment
Capital letters indicate additions; [ ] indicates deletions.

Rule 23.06  Deliverable Metal Specifications

(B) Shapes

      Aluminum tendered against each contract shall conform to one of the
following shapes.

(1) Sows weighing from six hundred (600) to fifteen hundred seventy-five
(1,575) pounds; or

(2) T-bars weighing from six hundred (600) to [ fifteen hundred seventy-five
(1,575) ] SEVENTEEN HUNDRED THIRTY-FIVE (1,735) pounds.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=tana.jones@enron.com&refdo
c=(00-341)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


Joe Hartsoe -

My understanding is that Hebert doesn't have the legal authority (and the
filing never makes clear) to Suspend performance under the PPA (he probably
doesn't have the political support for this either).

EPSA, however, could support this in its filing as a method to help move the
QF issue forward.

Jim

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	03/20/2001 10:04 AM

		 To: Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Linda
Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Ridgewood's Petition To Be Released From QF Contracts

FYI.  Any thoughts Joe & Co.? Is release from contracts an "increase supply"
option?  My fear is that QFs get released and then California's "police
state" mentality kicks in, enacting Exec Orders, legislation, etc. to ensure
that the power from the QF facilities stays in California.

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/20/2001 10:00 AM -----

	Chris H Foster@ECT
	03/20/2001 07:30 AM

		 To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Ridgewood's Petition To Be Released From QF Contracts

We are trying to set up energy purchasing arrangements with QFs who get
temporarily released from their contracts.  Take a look at the e-mail below
and see if we can suport them.

Thanks

C
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT on 03/20/2001
05:26 AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Short, Bill" <BSHORT@ridgewoodpower.com>
03/19/2001 03:59 PM

To: "Michael Davis (E-mail)" <mdavis02@coral-energy.com>, "Frank Eckhart
(E-mail)" <ffec@dynegy.com>, "Steve B. Van Leer (E-mail)"
<sbvanleer@duke-energy.com>, "Doug Fernley (E-mail)"
<doug.fernley@elpaso.com>, "Chris H. Foster (E-mail)"
<chris.h.foster@enron.com>, "Jack Pyburn (E-mail)"  <jack.pyburn@mirant.com>,
"Mark Thompson (E-mail)"  <mark.thompson@nrgenergy.com>, "Marvin (\"Trip\")
K. Ballard (E-mail)"  <marvin_k_ballard@reliantenergy.com>, "Shawn Nichols
(E-mail)"  <shawn.nichols@williams.com>, "Kyle T. Hoffman (E-mail)"
<khoffman@caiso.com>
cc: "Bahrs, John" <jbahrs@ridgewoodpower.com>, "Gulino, Dan"
<dgulino@ridgewoodpower.com>, "Holmes, Randy"  <Rholmes@ridgewoodpower.com>,
"Kawash, David"  <dkawash@ridgewoodpower.com>, "Naunton, Chris"
<Cnaunton@ridgewoodpower.com>, "Quinn, Marty"  <Mquinn@ridgewoodpower.com>
Subject: Ridgewood's Petition To Be Released From QF Contracts

 <<Comments_of_Ridgewood_letter_docket_no._EL01-47.DOC>>  <<RIDGEWOOD
_REQUEST_FOR_EXTENSION-FILING _3601.DOC>>

Gentlemen,

In light of the possible backouts in California today and later this week,
if it is possible, Ridgewood Power requests that your organization intervene
in support of the attached emergency filing at the FERC.  Please send this
e-mail to your firm's general counsel and ask him to contact either our
Washington counsel, Carol Smoots (202-496-7196), our general counsel, Dan
Gulino (800-331-8006, x-118) or me at (800-331-8006, x-163).  Any help would
be most appreciated.

Sincerely yours,

Bill Short

 - Comments_of_Ridgewood_letter_docket_no._EL01-47.DOC
 - RIDGEWOOD _REQUEST_FOR_EXTENSION-FILING _3601.DOC


---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Poorman/NA/Enron on 01/25/2001 10:47
AM ---------------------------

"Shankster JL (Luther)" <JLShankster@equiva.com> on 01/25/2001 10:33:52 AM
To: "'Lamphier, Gary'" <glamphi@enron.com>
cc: kyle.r.lilly@enron.com, mary.poorman@enron.com, "Carter, John"
<JCCarter@equiva.com>, "Ricks, Ruth" <RARicks@equiva.com>

Subject: February Nominations at Shell Deer Park

Gary,

February 2001 nominations for gas delivery to Shell Deer Park are as
follows:

Firm Baseload - 75,000 MMBtu/d
Spot Swing supply - 0 (zero)

Delivery of the above contract quantities is expected to be as follows:

  HPL-HP   HPL-E   HPL-S
 Firm 15,000 MMBtu/d 25,000 MMBtu/d 35,000 MMBtu/d

Turnaround activity started in January is expected to continue for the
duration of February

Please let me know if you have any questions

J. Luther Shankster

Energy & Utilities Planning
> Phone: 713/277-9307
> Fax: 713/277-9941
> E-Mail: jlshankster@equiva.com
> Home Page: http://rsweb
>


Doug,
I will bring this issue up with EGAS management - - will revert with their feedback on this internal accounting transfer (i.e., no new cash to Enron) as well as the trasnfer of associated interest gonig forward, etc.  We need to consider the potential effect to Enron of this internal transfer from the perspective of legal strategies as well as current restructuring efforts with the lenders.

On another matter: have not heard from you regarding the Venezuela trading assistance (from Vengas).

Thanks, Mariella

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Leach, Doug
Sent:	Friday, August 17, 2001 8:40 AM
To:	Shields, David; Mahan, Mariella
Cc:	Lessor, James N.; Buy, Rick; Moran, Tom; Price, Brent A.; Nowlan Jr., John L.; Shankman, Jeffrey A.
Subject:	SECLP

With SECLP being shutdown for almost two months and no positive news in sight I think we need to address the internal transfer of $28 million to settle the outstanding fuel bill. There is no longer a reason for this to remain on EFI's receivables and we need to settle the account.


i will be there.

	From:  Colleen Sullivan                           06/02/2000 12:24 PM

To: Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris
Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Theresa Branney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly S
Olinger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jane M Tholt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Greif/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bhavna Pandya/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris
Gaskill/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Meeting--Friday, June 9

The next meeting regarding EOL capacity trading will be held on Friday, June
9th in EB3321 from 11:00 am to 12:30 p.m.  There is a NYMEX screen in this
conference room, and lunch will be provided.  Please advise if you are unable
to attend.
Topics for discussion are:
- Discuss limitation of pipelines/paths to be initially provided on EOL.
Capacity traders should know which paths are the most desired from a trading
standpoint,  along with the tradability of the capacity on those pipelines.
- Position reporting--Each of the capacity traders should be prepared to talk
about ideas for handling position reporting for their difficult pipelines.
 Judy--TETCO; Dan--Tennessee; Chris--TCO; Theresa-ANR; Jane/Kim - ???
- Bob Superty will give an update on the technical aspect of tying into
pipeline EBBs, and other Logistics issues related to EOL capacity trading.


---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 11/03/2000
11:33 AM ---------------------------

Shauncy Mathews
11/03/2000 09:18 AM
To: Janet Warri/NA/Enron@Enron, Lisa Shoemake/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy
Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angela Collins/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject:

---------------------- Forwarded by Shauncy Mathews/HOU/ECT on 11/03/2000
09:18 AM ---------------------------

	Elida Aguilar @ ENRON

	11/03/2000 09:15:19 AM

To: bheiman@worldnet.att.net, Denissa Arredondo/Corp/Enron@Enron,
julia.guzman@photomask.com, esther.hernandez@photomask.com,
rose.rivera@enron.com, Donna Ruff/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Shauncy
Mathews/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lori Boutte/Corp/Enron@Enron, Albernita
Travis/Corp/Enron@Enron, Valerie Villareal/HOU/EES@EES, Chris
Littlejohn/Enron@EnronXGate
cc:
Subject:

----- Forwarded by Elida Aguilar/Corp/Enron on 11/03/2000 09:12 AM -----

	Patricia Flores <PFlores@corestaff.com>
	11/02/2000 08:50 AM

		 To: Kirsten Bernard <KBernard@corestaff.com>, "'Alicia Contreras'"
<acontreras@appleorthodontix.com>, "'Alton Jr.'" <ajn114@hotmail.com>,
"'Arthur Requena'" <artrequena@yahoo.com>, "'Brittney Gonzales'"
<critter315@aol.com>, "'Carli'" <carli.smallwood@broadwing.com>, "'Diane
Casares'" <cas3355@aol.com>, "'Ehren Moreno'" <emallstar@aol.com>, "'Elda'"
<eldaniecie99@cs.com>, "'Elmontre Williams'" <elmontre.williams@chron.com>,
"'Eric Moreno'" <moreno555@aol.com>, "'Felecia Victor'"
<felecianash@hotmail.com>, "'Larry Flores'" <hckd6190@aol.com>, "'Lila
Aguilar'" <elida.aguilar@enron.com>, "'Rosa Flores'" <r33petal@aol.com>,
"'Roxanne'" <roxanne.leonard@broadwing.com>, "'Ruben'"
<rloredo_iii@hotmail.com>, "'Sooky'" <sookym@aol.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject:

      >
      >      Watch and listen carefully
      >
      >      The man whispered, "God, speak to me" and a
meadowlark
      >      sang.  But, the man did not hear.
      >
      >      So the man yelled "God, speak to me!"  And, the
thunder
      >      rolled across the sky.  But, the man did not listen.
      >
      >      The man looked around and said, "God let me see you."
      >      And a star shined brightly.  But the man did not
notice.
      >
      >      And, the man shouted, "God show me a miracle!"  And,
a
      >      life was born.  But, the man did not know.
      >
      >      So, the man cried out in despair,  "Touch me God, and
      >      Let me know you are here!"
      >
      >      Whereupon, God reached down and touched the man.
But,
      >      the man brushed the butterfly away and walked on.
      >
      >      Don't miss out on a blessing because it isn't
packaged
      >      the way that you expect.
      >
      >      My instructions were to send this to four people that
I
      >      wanted God to bless and I picked you. Please pass
this to
four
      >      people you want  to be blessed.
      >      This prayer is powerful and there is nothing
attached.
      >      Prayer is one of the best gifts we receive. There is
no
      >      cost but a lot of rewards.  Let's continue to pray
for
      >      one another. God bless and have a nice day!
      >
      >      "Father, I ask you to bless my friends, relatives and
      >      email buddies reading this right now. Show them a new
revelation of
      >      your love and power.
      >      Holy spirit, I ask you to minister to their spirit at
      >      this very moment. Where there is pain, give them your
peace
and
      >      mercy. Where there is self-doubt, release a renewed
confidence
      > through your
      >      grace, In Jesus precious Name."
      >      Amen
      >
      >      If you are so inclined, please send this to four
people
      >      who could use an extra dose of God's blessings today
(isn't that
      >      everyone we know)!
      >
      >
      >


Today, Senators Bob Smith (R-NH) and Harry Reid (D-NV) will introduce an MTBE
bill. which is expected to be slightly different than we've seen in previous
Congresses.

We expect it to include:

1) a 4-year date certain to eliminate MTBE, with EPA determining the phaseout
schedule
2)  a lifting of the 2% oxygenate standard upon perfunctory petition by State
governors within 90 days from date of enactment
3)  and environmental "anti-backsliding" provision focused only on air-toxics
and using a 2000 baseline with a 27.5% percent standard (the way I understand
it right now, RFG must perform 27.5% better than 2000 baseline for
conventional gasoline)
4) provisions for MTBE producer "transition assistance"

Brief analysis:

We'll have more details shortly, but the bill looks a little better than
previous efforts.  A number of bills have been introduced this Congress, but
this will probably be the leading effort.

As you know, Enron has led efforts to include the "transition assistance"
piece -- which is still largely undefined in the legislation -- but we are
pleased with the inclusion of a "placeholder" while the Senate decides on the
best approach.  We will continue to lead the development of such incentives
(which will likely take the form of EPA/DOE funding for MTBE producers who
convert plants to produce iso-octane or alkylate).

An MTBE ban is of course not good, but a "date certain" gives producers more
flexibility to determine their options rather than reduce production under
several steps of a phase out.   Allowing states to get a waiver of the oxy
standard is probably a given in any legislation, but will face some
opposition from the ethanol community -- who just want a simple MTBE ban.

The anti-backsliding provision is still being refined, but looks fairly
lame.  We need more details to make an accurate assessment, but its likely
that environmental groups will want a bit more.

One political factor -- with Sen. Jim Jeffords leaving the Republican party,
Democrats will be given control of the Senate Environment Committee, which
will consider this bill.  They will likely allow Jeffords to chair the
committee.  The significance is that Sen. Bob Smith (R-NH) is the current
chair, and has been able to use that position to drive his past bills on MTBE
-- in losing the chairmanship, his legislation may face a longer road through
Committee.

I will keep you posted as the legislation evolves.

Jeffrey Keeler
Director, Environmental Strategies
Enron
Washington DC office - (202) 466-9157
Cell Phone (203) 464-1541


THANK YOU MATT!  I LOVE THE CARD AND HAD LOTS OF FUN WITH IT!
Grandma


PLEASE READ THIS IMPORTANT INFORMATION CONCERNING THE ENRON STOCK FUND IN THE ENRON CORP. SAVINGS AND ESOP PLANS

On Friday, January 11, trading of Enron stock was suspended on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE).  All Savings and ESOP Plan transactions, including 401(k) payroll contributions,  involving this fund were placed in a pending status until trading resumed.

As announced by Enron's Office of the Chair on Wednesday, January 16, Enron stock would now be traded Over The Counter (OTC).  Upon receiving this information, work began immediately to develop a process that allows for OTC trades in the plans.

On Thursday, January 17, Enron initiated a process to facilitate OTC trades of Enron stock inside the 401(k) and ESOP and all pending transactions were processed using Thursday's closing price.

Now that trading has resumed, we urge you to review your investment elections to ensure that they are consistent with your investment goals.

As things change, we will continue to update you.

Enron Benefits Department


Please follow up with Lou on this.  It sounds like something the commercial
people would be in a good position to answer, so maybe start by finding out
if they are already responding, either through Lou or otherwise.  Then get
the right people to review and supplement this list.  Thanks. df
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 11/08/2000
12:29 PM ---------------------------

11/08/2000 11:06 AM
Louis Soldano
Louis Soldano
Louis Soldano
11/08/2000 11:06 AM
11/08/2000 11:06 AM
To: John Shafer/OTS/Enron, Janet Place/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Molly
Sample/Houston/Eott@Eott, David Johnson/EU/Enron@Enron, David L
Johnson/OTS/Enron@ENRON, David Bush/ECF/Enron@ENRON, Mark
Cartwright/ECF/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dorothy
McCoppin/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Don Hawkins/OTS/Enron@Enron
cc: Phil Lowry/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, James
Prentice/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Colleen Raker/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michael
Moran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: ETS Products/Services

EHS Corporate has asked we verify this inventory of services/products  from
all of the various companies that fit under the very broadest form of the ETS
umbrella.  I offer the following thoughts:  I don't believe EOTT has any
relationship with the Mt. Belvieu storage operations; I don't know if we
purchase natural gas except for fuel purposes; do we currently have any gas
gathering facilities?? or just transmission??; EOTT Fleet Vehicles could be
better defined; Risk Management services??

Feedback would be extremely helpful before the 17th
---------------------- Forwarded by Louis Soldano/ET&S/Enron on 11/08/2000
10:53 AM ---------------------------
From: Susan Worthen@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 11/07/2000 10:00 AM
To: Louis Soldano/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: ETS Products/Services

Lou,

This is a follow-up to a meeting we had about 2 months ago on Life Cycle
Impact Assessments.  The 1st phase of the assessment involves completing an
inventory of Enron's products\services and volumes.  I am currently
requesting each business unit to verify the products and services we have
identified and make any modifications to the list.  I am enlisting your
assistance to do this for ETS, including EOTT.  I need to have the
verification completed by 11/17. Please advise if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Susan Worthen
Director
Environmental Compliance, Enron Corp
713/646-6579  713/345-6164 fax
3AC 1525


Check out the latest version of Enron Business Online at home.enron.com.
Click on Publications, then on Enron Business and "Volume 3, 2000".  In
celebration of Enron's 15th birthday, this issue includes a trivia quiz on
the history of the company.  Five winners will be randomly drawn from correct
entries to win a Millennium Zippered Padfolio with removable CD storage,
numerous pockets, writing pad and pen holder.  Also, watch for your print
version in the mail - it includes a full-color poster of Enron's milestones
from 1985 until now!

In this issue:

Enron Caribbean power barge drops anchor in Guatemala;
Enron starts a commodity market in credit risk with EnronCredit.com;
Enron Argentina's venture begins to bloom;
Transwestern's fast track solution resolves market bottleneck;
Enron acquires MG plc, the world's leading independent metal marketer; and
How WorkLife programs are making Enron the best place to work.


schedule and file.  I will be presenting at this meeting.
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 01/21/2001 03:53 PM -----

	Rebecca Carter
	Sent by: Kelly Johnson
	01/19/2001 11:27 AM
	Please respond to kelly.johnson

		 To: James M Bannantine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cliff
Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sanjay Bhatnagar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Diomedes
Christodoulou/SA/Enron@Enron, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, James
Derrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Andrew S Fastow/HOU/ECT@ECT, peggy_fowler@pgn.com,
Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, Ben F Glisan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Hannon/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, David
Haug/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Larry L Izzo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mike
McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rebecca McDonald/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Jeffrey McMahon/Enron@EnronXGate, Mark Metts/NA/Enron@Enron, Cindy
Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen S Owens@ees@EES, Ken Rice/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Jeffrey Sherrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John
Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Greg
Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas E White/HOU/EES@EES, Philippe A Bibi/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Raymond Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael R Brown/LON/ECT@ECT, Wade
Cline/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, James A
Hughes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Harold G
Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Mark S Muller/HOU/EES@EES,
Matthew Scrimshaw/LON/ECT@ECT, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, David Cox/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Steve Elliott/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Jim Fallon/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Rod
Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Danny McCarty/ET&S/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Terry West/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jim Armogida/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Joyce/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Pam Butler/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stephanie
McGinnis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda Castillo/NA/Enron@Enron, Marcia
Manarin/SA/Enron@Enron, Susan Skarness/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy
Guidroz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Beena
Pradhan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Karen K Heathman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sharron Westbrook/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rosane Fabozzi/SA/Enron@Enron, Molly
Bobrow/NA/Enron@Enron, Kay Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie
Harris/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bridget Maronge/HOU/ECT@ECT, mary_trosper@pgn.com,
Nicki Daw/NA/Enron@Enron, Carol Ann Brown/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Elaine Rodriguez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cindy
Stark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary E Garza/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@Enron_Development,
Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Joannie Williamson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cathy
Phillips/HOU/ECT@ECT, Loretta Brelsford/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Sue Ford/Enron@EnronXGate, Dolores Fisher/NA/Enron@Enron, Kathy
McMahon/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen Owens/HOU/EES@EES, Dorothy Dalton/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Christina Grow/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lauren
Urquhart/LON/ECT@ECT, Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Liz M Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Judy G Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Inez Dauterive/HOU/ECT@ECT, Veronica
Valdez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Teresa Wright/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Peggy
McCurley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marsha Schiller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fiona Stewart/LON/ECT@ECT,
Jana L Paxton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mrudula
Gadade/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Connie
Blackwood/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Tammie Schoppe/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kimberly Hillis/HOU/ECT@ect, Jennifer Burns/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sharon
Dick/HOU/EES@EES, Beverly Aden/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES, Kathryn
Greer/HOU/EES@EES, Kerry Ferrari/LON/ECT@ECT, Carol Moffett/HOU/EES@EES,
Jennifer T Adams/HOU/EES@EES, Leah Rijo/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Lucy Marshall/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Kathy Campos/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Julie Armstrong/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Board of Directors Meeting - February 13, 2001


TODAY'S HEADLINES
The New York Times on the Web
Saturday, November 24, 2001
------------------------------------------------------------
For news updated throughout the day, visit www.nytimes.com

/-------------------Also From NYTimes.com------------------\

Holiday Shopping

Take advantage of special offers and discounts -- on gifts,
travel and luxury items from NYTimes.com's premium
advertisers -- with the Holiday Shopping E-Mail.

http://www.nytimes.com/services/email/email.html#holiday
\---------------------------------------------------------/

QUOTE OF THE DAY
=========================
"The customer has the means. What we are watching now is do
they have the will."
-CARL STEIDTMAN, of Deloitte Research, on holiday shopping.

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/24/business/24SHOP.html?todaysheadlines

NATIONAL
=========================
No Anthrax Is Found at Victim's Home or Two Nearby Postal
Centers

The initial testing for anthrax at two postal   facilities
near home of the 94-year-old woman who died from inhalation
anthrax this week turned up no trace of the bacteria.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/24/nyregion/24ANTH.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Despite Ruling, Logan Official Predicts Ouster of Security
Firm

The interim security director for Logan International
Airport in Boston still believes   he will be able to
revoke the permit of the reinstated Argenbright Security
Inc.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/24/national/24LOGA.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Facing Decreased Demand for Coins, Mint Starts Layoffs

The United States Mint is laying off workers because the
softening economy has sharply reduced demand for new coins.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/24/national/24MINT.html?todaysheadlines

-----

MORE NATIONAL NEWS:
http://www.nytimes.com/pages/national/index.html?todaysheadline

/--------------------- ADVERTISEMENT ---------------------\
FREE annual reports-- Order Now!

Get FREE annual reports from EuroLand.com.
Featuring a wide range of information from world-class
companies including Toyota, BMW, DaimlerChrysler, NTT,
DoCoMo, UBS, Tomkins Solvay, Assa Abloy, Royal & Sun
Alliance and many more. Click here to order now.

http://ads.nyt.com/lx.ads/email.nytimes.com/todaysheadlines/text/22297/Position3/th-europeg/eurotext.html/
\---------------------------------------------------------/

INTERNATIONAL
=========================
Pakistanis Again Said to Evacuate Allies of Taliban

Northern Alliance soldiers said that airplanes had once
again flown into Kunduz on Friday to evacuate Pakistanis
who have been fighting alongside Taliban forces trapped
there.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/24/international/asia/24AFGH.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Israeli Forces Kill a Top Leader of Islamic Group in West
Bank

Israeli forces on Friday killed a top leader of the
Palestinian extremist group Hamas who had eluded them for
years, Hamas officials said.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/24/international/24MIDE.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Spain Sets Hurdle for Extraditions

Spain has said that it will not extradite eight men charged
with complicity in the Sept. 11 attacks unless the U.S.
agrees to civilian trials.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/24/international/europe/24SPAI.html?todaysheadlines

-----

MORE INTERNATIONAL NEWS:
http://www.nytimes.com/pages/world/index.html?todaysheadline

BUSINESS
=========================
For Holiday Shoppers, Sale Is the Only Thing

Lured by sales and discounts, consumers kicked off the
holiday shopping season and ventured to stores Friday with
rekindled appetites.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/24/business/24SHOP.html?todaysheadlines

-----

The Arbiters of Recession Stand Ready

It's almost official: the economy is in recession, ending
the longest uninterrupted expansion in American history.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/24/business/24RECE.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Russia Delays Any Decision on Oil Cuts

Russia surprised world oil markets on Friday by rebuffing
OPEC's demands to cut oil output for 2002, postponing a
decision until next month.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/24/business/worldbusiness/24OIL.html?todaysheadlines

-----

MORE BUSINESS NEWS:
http://www.nytimes.com/pages/business/index.html?todaysheadline

TECHNOLOGY
=========================
Cyberspace Seen as Potential Battleground

Government officials are warning that cyberattacks are
likely as retribution for the United States campaign in
Afghanistan.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/23/technology/23CYBE.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Attacks at Hubs Could Disrupt Phone Lines

Public safety experts and telecommunications executives are
growing increasingly concerned about the possibility of
attacks on the telephone system.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/23/technology/23PHON.html?todaysheadlines

-----

What Did You Do Before the War?

New fears and new data tools are yielding a boom in
background checks -- even after you're hired.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/22/technology/circuits/22CHEC.html?todaysheadlines

-----

MORE TECHNOLOGY NEWS:
http://www.nytimes.com/pages/technology/index.html?todaysheadline

POLITICS
=========================
Wait Until Dark

In his blundering, John Ashcroft has now handed   radical
Islam a propaganda coup in its war against Israel.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/24/opinion/24RICH.html?todaysheadlines

-----

The World According to Colin Powell

Before Sept. 11, he was the lonely hope of European allies,
Congressional centrists and the media commentariat. What a
difference a war makes.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/24/magazine/25POWELL.html?todaysheadlines

-----

As Fiscal Engine Stalls, the Mechanics Line Up

A debate is breaking out among economists over whether the
$75 billion to $100 billion that the House and Senate seem
willing to spend on a stimulus package will be enough.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/24/business/24STIM.html?todaysheadlines

-----

MORE POLITICS NEWS:
http://www.nytimes.com/pages/politics/index.html?todaysheadline

SPORTS
=========================
Nebraska's Loss Opens Door to Other Title Hopefuls

While the national title ambitions of Nebraska crumbled
after its 62-36 loss to Colorado, the championship hopes of
Oklahoma, Florida and Tennessee were resuscitated.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/24/sports/ncaafootball/24DRAP.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Rangers Show Fighting Spirit in Loss

Dan Blackburn, the Rangers' rookie goaltender, was pelted
with 51 shots on goal in a loss to the Capitals that was
marred by penalties.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/24/sports/hockey/24RANG.html?todaysheadlines

-----

At Miami, Tradition Attracts Faithful Flock

When they meet the Huskies on Saturday, the Hurricanes will
be cheered on by a group of distinguished alumni who play
in the N.F.L. and return to Miami to support its winning
tradition.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/24/sports/ncaafootball/24COLL.html?todaysheadlines

-----

MORE SPORTS NEWS:
http://www.nytimes.com/pages/sports/index.html?todaysheadline

ARTS
=========================
No Room for Riches of the Indian Past

The nation's archaeological institutions cannot handle all
the artifacts found and excavated during publicly financed
projects.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/24/arts/design/24ARCH.html?todaysheadlines

-----

An Organization on the Lookout for Patriotic Incorrectness

A list compiled by a conservative nonprofit group accuses
scholars, students and even a university president of what
they call unpatriotic behavior after Sept. 11.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/24/arts/24LIST.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Saying Farewell in a Rush of Witty Ragas

Once Ravi Shankar picked up his sitar, there was nothing
hesitant or autumnal about the music.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/24/arts/music/24RAVI.html?todaysheadlines

-----

MORE ARTS NEWS:
http://www.nytimes.com/pages/arts/index.html?todaysheadline

NY REGION
=========================
No Anthrax Is Found at Victim's Home or Two Nearby Postal
Centers

The initial testing for anthrax at two postal   facilities
near home of the 94-year-old woman who died from inhalation
anthrax this week turned up no trace of the bacteria.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/24/nyregion/24ANTH.html?todaysheadlines

-----

With Ban Loosened, Some Small Aircraft Return to Manhattan
Skies

Helicopters and small airplanes, banned   from flying over
New York City since the   Sept. 11 terrorist attack, are
once again   taking to the local skies, case by case.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/24/nyregion/24COPT.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Residents Near Indian Point Plant Question Evacuation Plans

Many say the government's evacuation plans for people who
live around the Indian Point nuclear power plant are
impractical and cannot protect residents.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/24/nyregion/24EVAC.html?todaysheadlines

-----

MORE NY REGION NEWS:
http://www.nytimes.com/pages/nyregion/index.html?todaysheadline

OP-ED
=========================
Wait Until Dark
By FRANK RICH
In his blundering, John Ashcroft has now handed   radical
Islam a propaganda coup in its war against Israel.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/24/opinion/24RICH.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Right and Wrong
By ANTHONY LEWIS
Some of the moral and military high ground secured by the
United States is now being given up on another front: law.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/24/opinion/24LEWI.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Better Gas Mileage, Greater Security
By ROBERT F. KENNEDY JR.
There is a clear and pragmatic way to reduce our dependency
on foreign oil fast.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/24/opinion/24KENN.html?todaysheadlines

-----

MORE OP-ED  NEWS:
http://www.nytimes.com/pages/opinion/index.html?todaysheadline

HOW TO CHANGE YOUR SUBSCRIPTION
------------------------------------------------------------
You received these headlines because you requested The New
York Times Direct e-mail service. To cancel delivery,
change delivery options, change your e-mail address or sign
up for other newsletters, see http://www.nytimes.com/email.
Check or uncheck the headlines you would like to receive
and remember to go to the bottom of the page and click on
"Save Selections." To change your e-mail address, go to our
help center: http://www.nytimes.com/help.  Suggestions and
feedback are welcome at feedback@nytimes.com.

Please include the following ID number when writing to
feedback@nytimes.com so that we can track any reports of problems:
1120577

HOW TO ADVERTISE
------------------------------------------------------------
For information on advertising in e-mail newsletters or
other creative advertising opportunities with The New York
Times on the Web, please contact Alyson Racer at
alyson@nytimes.com or visit our online media kit at
http://www.nytimes.com/adinfo


Thanks Sara.  Are you going to be at the conference this week?

From: Sara Shackleton on 10/03/2000 08:45 AM CDT
To: Greg Johnston/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc: Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: RBC and TD Bank Swaps with Enron Canada

Greg:  I spoke with Joe and he IS working on the internal rate swap with John
(i.e., ECC/RMT and RMT/ENA).  Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 10/03/2000 08:44 AM -----

	Larry Joe Hunter
	10/02/2000 05:04 PM

		 To: Greg Johnston/CAL/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: RBC and TD Bank Swaps with Enron Canada

Greg,

The matrix I was given doesn't mention an internal rate swap.  I'll have to
check with John Griffith in Structuring.

Sara,
Do you know if the Interest Rate swap is also being backed out to RMT?

Thanks
Joe

Greg Johnston
10/02/2000 02:54 PM
To: Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: RBC and TD Bank Swaps with Enron Canada

Joe, I understood that there should be an internal interest rate swap in
addition to the commodity swap that you just faxed back to me.  Is someone
other than you preparing that document?

Thanks

Greg

	From:  Larry Joe Hunter                           10/02/2000 01:07 PM

To: Greg Johnston/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: RBC and TD Bank Swaps with Enron Canada

I have recieved everything.  I'll send copies of the TD & RBC signatures as
soon as I recieve them.  The Risk Management deal you signed is, in effect,
the Confirm between ENA and ECC.  For tax purposes, ENA does not deal
directly with ECC, so the Risk Management vehicle takes the place of ENA.

Thanks,
Joe

Greg Johnston
10/02/2000 10:50 AM
To: Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter
Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT, Sharon Crawford/CAL/ECT@ECT
Subject: RBC and TD Bank Swaps with Enron Canada

I believe that, as you requested, I have now had executed and returned to you
by fax copies of the commodity swaps between Enron Canada and each of RBC, TD
Bank and Risk Management as well as the two rate swaps between Enron Canada
and each of RBC and TD.  I believe the only other confirm requiring Enron
Canada's execution in this transaction is the back-to-back rate swap between
Enron Canada and ENA, whereby Enron Canada swaps the floating rate for the
fixed rate with ENA.  You can send that confirm directly to my attention by
e-mail and I will get it signed and sent back to you.  I understand that you
will be attending to obtaining counterparty execution of these confirms.
Could you do me a favor and, when you receive the fully executed confirms
back from the respective counterparties, fax fully executed copies of all the
confirms to my attention at 403-974-6707.  I am aggregating copies of all the
documents relating to this financing for our files and will need the executed
confirms as part of that process.

Thanks

Greg Johnston


I've allowed one person to enter Enron America into Jacoby's group from Broadband.  We need to be very selective because Broadband and EES will have people who will be put into redeployment.  I expect Louise or I to approve any employee who enters Enron America.  I will accept no exuses if someone slips in.


I think it looks fine; will defer to Jeff's edits.

	Jeannie Mandelker@ECT
	09/21/2000 05:05 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Yvette
Parker/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Mark Frevert's column for ENA's Exchange Magazine

Steve, this is the column I mentioned to you Monday. We do a column under
Mark's name for ENA's customer magazine, Exchange. This month's topic is
California. I'd like you to read it and see if we are getting the message
right. Jeff, please let me know if there are errors.

Once we get your comments, we'll show it to Mark.

Thanks,
Jeannie


Tammy, would you have some time for us to discuss our game plan?  Thanks. Lynn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Royal, Kathleen S." <Kathleen.Royal@ElPaso.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Royal+2C+20Kathleen+20S+2E+22+20+3CKathleen+2ERoyal+40ElPaso+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, July 03, 2001 4:30 PM
To:	'Lynn Blair'
Subject:	FW: X12 file exchange

Lynn,
We really need to start the X12 exchanges -- I am sure you will agree in
light of the events over the weekend.  I will push from my end and hopefully
you can push from yours and we can make this happen!

(Hope I see you at the Interconnect Meeting in October.)  I told Cheryl
Snyder to be sure both us were on her invitee list.  I think she'll be
sending out the notice soon.

Happy 4th from Colorado Springs,
Kathy

-----Original Message-----
From: Jaquet, Tammy [mailto:Tammy.Jaquet@ENRON.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 3:24 PM
To: Royal, Kathleen S.
Cc: Stender, Mike
Subject: RE: X12 file exchange

Kathy,

I have been working on other things.  I will focus on the confirmations
this week and give you and Mike an update.

Tammy

-----Original Message-----
From: Royal, Kathleen S. [mailto:Kathleen.Royal@ElPaso.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 12:26 PM
To: Stender, Mike; 'tjaquet@enron.com'
Cc: Trillo, Edgar D.
Subject: X12 file exchange

Tammy and Mike,

What's the status of our X12 file exchange?  Are we ready to implement
this?

Due to the latest problems in communication between our schedulers, we
probably should get this in place as soon as possible.  I believe it
would
streamline the confirmation process between our two pipes.

Let me know what I can do on this side to expedite getting this
going....

Kathy

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender.
******************************************************************

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender.
******************************************************************


John Nowlan is concerned that this var number isn't right.  According to
john, the group significantly reduced postions (on the whole).  What about
the forward forward vol?  Have we looked at that?  My instinct is that
something is not accurate with this var number today if you look at the
resulting position as of Friday evening's postion report.  I'd like someone
to be dedicated to the crude and products group full time who can help us
with "what if" scenarios throughout the trading day, and who can work with
Pavel on the crude desk on the forward forward vol issue.  Also, I'd like to
isolate first gas holdings since that is taking up approx 2 million in var
each day.

Jeff

To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, John L
Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Earnest/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bjorn Hagelmann/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Liquids Limits Oct. 20

Risk Ops. had problems loading the ERAC crude options spreadsheet  and VaR
had to be recalc. twice to confirm the $12.7MM violation.  Furthermore, we
had to scrub and confirm all positions with risk ops. before limits report
can be published.

Christian

Jeffrey A Shankman@ECT
10/23/2000 03:27 PM
To: Christian LeBroc/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, John L
Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Earnest/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bjorn Hagelmann/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Liquids Limits Oct. 20

Why did I not get this until 12:41?

	From:  Christian LeBroc @ ENRON                           10/23/2000 12:41 PM

To: Hugo Moreira/LON/ECT@ECT, David J Botchlett/HOU/ECT@ECT, John L
Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Chismar/SIN/ECT@ECT, John Buckner
Thomas/SIN/ECT@ECT, Scott Earnest/HOU/ECT@ECT, Risk Controls@ECT, Mary
Thambiah/LON/ECT@ECT, Oliver Gaylard/LON/ECT@ECT, Bjorn
Hagelmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Manfred Roenz/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lee
Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Homan Amiry/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Fondren/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Swinney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cindy Horn/LON/ECT@ECT,
Michelle Bruce/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Liquids Limits Oct. 20


Still waiting to hear back about your possible visit.  Any word?

Kevin


Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 06/16/2000 10:22 AM -----

	Jaime Williams@ENRON
	06/13/2000 08:18 PM

		 To: Jeff Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Mario Parra Cardoso/Corp/Enron@Enron, Susan Helton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alberto
Carreno/NA/Enron@ENRON, Rod Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: EOL list

Jeff, I am sending you the specific information of the indexes and products
that we believe our customers would be trading on EOL.....Please take a look
at the file attached, and the page with Index Definitions, for the
information you are looking for. The trades will be performed based on
indexes taht already exist in OEL, so no new Mexican Indices will be
included.   Please note however, that the mexican gas is priced in Mexico on
the basis of the Tetco/Valero basket. So, most probably, that same basket
will be included in the system to accomodate to our customer's needs.
Please note that Carol St Clair will be helping us on the legal aspects of
including Mexico into the EOL system.
Thanks and regards.

---------------------- Forwarded by Jaime Williams/NA/Enron on 06/13/2000
05:37 PM ---------------------------

Alejandro Montemayor
06/13/2000 03:32 PM
To: Jaime Williams/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: EOL list

Jaime
Aqui te mando el archivo de la lista de clientes EOL, en el mismo archivo ya
esta la descripci?n de cada uno de los productos. Son tres los productos que
no estan en EOL: el promedio Tetco y PG&E; el poliestireno y el PET.

Por otro lado para el polietileno esta la descripci?n para el LLDPE.

Si se requiere alg?n cambio solo avisame.
Saludos

Alex


Mr. Dawson,

Attached for your review is a draft of the Alcan Inc. Guaranty we are requesting on behalf of Alcan Aluminum Corporation.  We have set the guaranty up to cover physical gas and financial transactions with Enron North America Corp., and physical power with Enron Power Marketing, Inc.

On page no. 1, Alcan will need to complete the effective date and the State/Province of incorporation for Alcan Aluminum Corporation.  On page no. 3, Alcan will need to complete the contact information for Alcan Inc.

If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me at the below number, or by email.

Stephanie Panus
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3803C
Houston, Texas  77002
ph:  713.345.3249
fax:  713.646.3490
email:  stephanie.panus@enron.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Dorland/CAL/ECT on 02/08/2000 02:54
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Office of the Chairman @ ENRON                           02/08/2000
05:16 AM

To: All_Enron_North America, EC Employees -- All@Enron Communications, Mass
mailing list -- EECC all@enron_development, EI Announcements -- All Notes
Users (Part 01)@enron_development, EI Announcements -- All Notes Users (Part
02)@enron_development, EI Announcements -- All Notes Users (Part
03)@enron_development, EI Announcements -- All Notes Users (Part
04)@enron_development, EI Announcements -- All Notes Users (Part
05)@enron_development, EI Announcements -- All Notes Users (Part
06)@enron_development, EI Announcements -- All Notes Users (Part
07)@enron_development, EI Announcements -- All Notes Users (Part
08)@enron_development, EI Announcements -- All Notes Users (Part
09)@enron_development, EES_Employees@EES, ECT- Notes Domain-All@ECT, Enron
Corporate News/Enron@Gateway
cc:
Subject: Fortune Most Admired Ranking

Congratulations!  For an unprecedented five years in a row, Enron has been
ranked the "Most Innovative Company in America" by Fortune magazine.  In
addition, for the first time, Enron has also been ranked #1 in "Quality of
Management," topping General Electric and Omnicom Group, and our "Employee
Talent" has been ranked #2, behind Goldman Sachs and ahead of Cisco
Systems.   America's most admired management team is paired with the best and
brightest employee talent.  That winning combination has led to Enron's
five-year "Most Innovative" sweep.  The "Most Admired" list will appear in
Fortune's Feb. 21 issue, available on newsstands Feb. 8.

You are the reason we have achieved such consistent recognition.  You bring
the innovative ideas to Enron and create new business opportunities.  You
contribute to our quality management team.  And you are the outstanding
employee talent that makes Enron such an exciting and successful company.

Keep up your outstanding work, and we look forward to even greater
achievements in 2000!


Carolyn M. Campbell
King?& Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

-----Original Message-----
From: VAN DUSEN, Nicholas [mailto:nicholas.vandusen@freshfields.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 11:38 AM
To: 'ccampbell@kslaw.com'; 'gregorylang@paulhastings.com'
Cc: PARKER, Isabel
Subject: John Hancock Letter Agreement

This e-mail is confidential and may well also be legally privileged. If you
have received it in error, you are on notice of its status.  Please notify
us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your
system.  Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its
contents to any other person:  to do so could be a breach of confidence.
Thank you for your co-operation.  Please contact our
IT Helpdesk on +44 (0) 20 7936 4000 Ext.2000 or email ITHelp@freshfields.com
if you need assistance.

Please find the attached signed document sent on behalf of our clients.

Regards,
Nick Van Dusen

Nicholas Van Dusen
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP
Tel: 212-284-4984
FAX: 212-277-4001
nicholas.vandusen@freshfields.com

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - john_han.pdf


Vince:  I don't think that you could have summarized the situation any
better!!!   I will be happy to respond to Neil as you suggested.

Thanks,
Molly

Vince J Kaminski
01/24/2001 11:02 AM
To: Molly Magee/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: L1 Visa - Anshuman Shrivastava

Molly,

Thanks for the update. Two points.

Please, let Neil McGregor know that many possible proposals were floated
with regard to Anshuman and there was some noise in the system.
We need L1 visa anyway and we decided to go ahead an arrange it.
I shall also write to him and explain the confusion.

Also, if I have the choice between upsetting Neil or Jeffs (Shankman and
Skilling),
I shall choose Neil.

Vince

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Molly Magee                           01/24/2001 10:13 AM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: L1 Visa - Anshuman Shrivastava

Vince:  Apparently Neil McGregor became upset when he received Margaret
Daffin's email.    He is saying, however, that Anshuman will only be in
Houston for one month, and you had mentioned six months when we spoke
earlier.   It really doesn't make any difference since he will need to get an
L1 visa under either circumstance, but I thought you might want to see his
email.

Molly
---------------------- Forwarded by Molly Magee/HOU/ECT on 01/24/2001 10:09
AM ---------------------------

Margaret Daffin
01/24/2001 09:57 AM
To: Molly Magee/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: L1 Visa - Anshuman Shrivastava

Molly:  per our conversation today.  Please let me know the status so that I
can proceed with the visa process.
Thanks
Margaret

---------------------- Forwarded by Margaret Daffin/HOU/ECT on 01/24/2001
09:56 AM ---------------------------

Neil McGregor@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
01/24/2001 05:18 AM
To: Margaret Daffin/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Wade Cline/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Re: L1 Visa - Anshuman Shrivastava

Anshuman is not moving or immigrating to the US. We are allowing him to work
for a 1month assignment in the US with Enron. Please carry out the necessary
approvals and visa's on this basis.
Neil McGregor
CEO Dabhol Power

Margaret Daffin@ECT
01/23/2001 10:31 PM
To: anshuman.srivastav@enron.com
cc: Molly Magee/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jane
Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Timothy Callahan/NA/Enron@Enron, Ranendra
Sengupta/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Wade
Cline/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Neil
McGregor/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ECT, Harsimran
Singh/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: L1 Visa - Anshuman Shrivastava

Anshuman:  I have been asked to contact you regarding your possible move to
Houston, Texas.  In order that I may begin the process of getting you an L1
immigration visa, I will need you to complete the attached visa questionnaire
and return it to me with copies of the following documents:

a copy of all pages of your passport, even if blank
copies of all previous US visas issued
an updated resume, showing months and years
copies of all Diplomas and transcripts received
if you have dependent family members coming to the States with you, copies of
their passports

Please send to my attention, via Fedex to:

Enron Corp.
3 Allen Center, 3AC2026A
333 Clay Street
Houston, TX 77002

Please call me with any questions you may have at 713-345-5083.


There will be a management meeting in ECN 49C1 @ 6:30 p.m.  Please notify me only if you are unable to attend.

		Int'l dial-in number# 801.983.4017 (for John Sherriff & Michael Brown)
		Passcode # 54536

Many Thanks,

Liz Taylor
Exec. Assistant to Greg Whalley
Office of the Chairman
Enron Corporation
Tel.   713.853.1935
Fax   713.853.1838


Guys, attached you will find a preliminary agenda for the 2000 ENA Offsite.
As leaders of the organization, you have been invited to participate in a two
day offsite where business 2001 objectives and strategies for ENA will be
discussed.  It is scheduled to occur December 14th and 15th at the Venetian
in Las Vegas.

This is the forum to ensure that your point of view and ideas can be heard
and incorporated into our plans and iniatives as such I would encourage
everyone to attend and to stay for the entire period.  In particular, we
would like everyone to stay over Friday night and leave Saturday morning.

ENA public relations (Dorie) will manage all the logistics including air fare.

Final invitations, details and agenda will follow shortly.

Regards
Dave and John


PB,
FYI, please make sure someone takes a look at this and atleast provides a
response.

Thanks,
mike
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT on 07/28/2000
08:10 AM ---------------------------

"Wilson, Terryl" <terryl.wilson@us.origin-it.com> on 07/26/2000 05:01:36 PM
To: "'mike.mcconnell@enron.com'" <mike.mcconnell@enron.com>,
"'cathy.phillips@enron.com'" <cathy.phillips@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: letter of 7/17/00 re: data center operations

 <<ltrhd enron 7.17.doc>>

This letter was also sent to Mr. Fastow on 7/12/00.

I look forward to talking to you.

Regards

Terryl

terryl.wilson@us.origin-it.com
TEL?????? 972.861.1955
CELL??? 214.335.9146
FAX????? 972.387.1896

 - ltrhd enron 7.17.doc


I gave this to Gail to handle. She in turn is getting Bob Vote to handle. In
the documents I received yesterday, I only saw an application for writ of
garnishment, not a signed order--do you have one?

	John Schwartzenburg@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	04/10/2001 01:53 PM

		 To: Keith Dodson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Nigel
Carling/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steve
Reistetter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Stephen P
Stein/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Keith
Marlow/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Brian Stanley/EU/Enron@ENRON,
Kenneth L Bean/HOU/EES@EES, johng@nepco.com@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Keith
Dodson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Nigel Carling/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Keith Marlow/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steve
Reistetter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Stephen P
Stein/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dan
Shultz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joe
Lakes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mark Brand@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Willie Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jude
Rolfes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Brian
Stanley/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kenneth L
Bean/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, johng@nepco.com@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
steved@nepco.com@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, danielh@nepco.com, Scott
Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Randy Pais@Enron, Jim
Desrochers/NA/Enron@Enron, Larry Bishop/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert
Sevitz/NA/Enron@Enron, Cheryl Costa/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Brian D Barto/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John G
Rigby@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Claudia Santos@Enron, Wyndel McNamara@ENRON, Richard
Murphy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Shirley
Oliver/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kristi
Dobbs/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mayra Mendez@Enron, Angie
Chappell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc: Mark E Haedicke@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Richard B Sanders@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Robert Vote@ENRON, Joseph T Grajewski/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Mark Brand@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michael Pearson/NA/Enron@Enron, Vladimir
Gorescu/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 Subject: URGENT STOP PAYMENT: Writ of Garnishment of money due CIGSA served
on EECC on April 10

EECC has just been served with a writ of garnishment from the 333rd Judicial
District Court of Harris County  in connection with a judgment against
certain CIGSA entities. In the writ, the court very unambiguously and very
plainly commands that EECC is not to pay any debt or deliver any property to
CIGSA pending further orders from  the court. The writ was issued to enforce
an judgment  for $1.3 million awarded by the court against CIGSA in favor of
Richard P Estrada. EECC is also commanded to appear before the court and list
all funds/assets in our possession that might belong to CIGSA,  and to
disclose what other persons we know ofif any, that might have such funds or
assets.  The lawyer for Mr. Estrada is the same lawyer who successfully
garnished EECC in the past to collect sums owed other CIGSA judgment
creditors.

Please take this prohibition as applying even to cases where CIGSA might be
entitled to the money or the property under our contracts with them, or where
the funds or property are in joint venture acounts or custody in the US or
Mexico until we have had a chance to review matters in detail and make a more
accurate assessment. In the meantime, effective immediately, do not make ANY
payments to or on behalf of, or release ANY property to or on behalf of, any
CIGSA entity without first obtaining legal department approval. The court may
impose penalties for violations  of its garnishment order.

We will assemble an appropriate litigation team to work onthis matter. Randy
Pais will be handling this for EEOS legal. I suggest that Mike Pearson and
Mark Brand get the word out to the Project Management and Project Control
teams on  this matter ASAP.

JWVS


---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 03/16/2001 11:48 AM
---------------------------
From: Michael Neves/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/15/2001 07:29 PM
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: JP Morgan Securities Inc. (Electronic Order)

Tana,

The problem has been fixed. The select statements of each of the "views" 1-12
to exclude "Other" Agreements.  The view "13. Other Agreements" excludes all
"Regular" Agreements and in addition all "Other" Agreements are excluded from
the unsecured All By C/P view that everyone in Enron has access to.  Please
check/verify that the "Other" Agreements are no longer showing up in the All
By C/P view(s) and let me know if it still needs attention.  Hopefully it
doesn't.

Thanks,
Mike 3-3363
 -----Original Message-----
From:  Jones, Tana
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 6:41 PM
To: Neves, Michael
Cc: Shackleton, Sara
Subject: Re: JP Morgan Securities Inc. (Electronic Order)

Mike,

I know I'm not supposed to continue imposing on you, but if these entries are
showing up in both places this is going to creating large problems for us, as
well as giving persons who should not have access to brokerage/other
agreements access to that information.  Our brokers are quite confidential.
The only information we want to make available to all Enron employees is the
master swap agreements.  Can you PLEASE, PLEASE take a look at this for me.
It is very critical that this drop down works correctly.

	Sara Shackleton 03/14/01 06:32 PM 	  To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT  cc:
Subject: Re: JP Morgan Securities Inc. (Electronic Order) << OLE Object:
StdOleLink >>

You need to speak with the developer.  There is no way to control the
inclusion of "Other Agreements" in the "All Agreements" section as the system
is currently designed.

I am not disagreeing with you; I learned this the hard way a few months ago.
The system is confusing.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Tana Jones 03/14/2001 05:47 PM 	  To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT  cc:
Subject: Re: JP Morgan Securities Inc. (Electronic Order) << OLE Object:
StdOleLink >>

It has been my understanding that the first section is supposed to be for
master swap agreements only.  Having other documents listed in that section
may be misleading to some parties who may misconstrue their use for general
trading purposes, such as Global Contracts.  That is why we created the
"Other Agreements" section, to house these other agreements.  My
understanding isthat the only reason other agreements has been listed in the
Master Swap Agreements Section is that they have been done so erroneously.
The drop down were not created too artfully created, allowing wrong
agreements to be put in Master Swap Agreements, which has been
proliferating.  If my understanding is not correct, than when did the
intentional use of that first section change?  I think putting all agreement
is a very bad idea.

	Sara Shackleton 03/14/01 05:35 PM 	  To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT  cc:
Subject: Re: JP Morgan Securities Inc. (Electronic Order) << OLE Object:
StdOleLink >>

Tana:  I think the agreement is listed in Section 1 (all agreements) which is
not just Master Swap Agreements.  It is also listed in the approprate Section
13 entry.
Hope you're enjoying Canada!

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Tana Jones 03/14/2001 04:26 PM 	   To: Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Cheryl
Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron  cc: (bcc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT)  Subject: JP Morgan
Securities Inc. (Electronic Order)

The above counterparty has been created in the Financial Trading Agreements
Database and is listed as a master swap agreement, and it's not.  It is an
Electronic Trading Agreement and needs to be moved down to "Other
Agreements".  Please let me know when that is done and I will delete the
entry in  the master swap agreement database.  Thanks!


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 02/22/2000 10:46
AM ---------------------------

dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com on 02/22/2000 09:06:55 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: "        -         *Dalphon, Charles" <cdalpho@columbiaenergygroup.com>,
"        -         *Porter, Jeffrey" <jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com>,
"        -         *Flewellyn, Melissa" <mflewellyn@columbiaenergygroup.com>,
"        -         *Bartlo, Noel" <nbartlo@columbiaenergygroup.com>, "
-         *Scott, David" <dscott1@columbiaenergygroup.com>, "
-         *scott.goodell@enron.com" <scott.goodell@enron.com>
Subject: AGL supply strategy for Remainder of Feb'00

Chris--At this date, CES has a large overhang of storage inventory on AGL.
To address this situation, I have asked David Scott to increase our IBSS
withdrawals to the maximum daily withdrawal quantities for the rest of
February.   Moreover, we also want to maximize our daily withdrawals on the
directly assigned storage services for the rest February.    We don't want gas
injected into storage unless it is necessary to avoid a penalty.   David will
contact Scott about the Directly Assigned storage withdrawals.

To the extent that maximizing our storage withdrawals requires us to cut back
on flowing gas, the cuts in flowing gas will be sold back to ENA  per our
contract.

Please call me if you have questions, etc.

Thanks.

Doug Kinney
Ph:  703-561-6339
Fax:  703-561-7317


I think Steven Wolf is the person to talk to about moving Kim Olinger to a
different RC code.


---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Carson/Corp/Enron on 11/20/2000
03:53 PM ---------------------------

"Cody Downard" <CDownard@vailresorts.com> on 11/20/2000 03:10:39 PM
To: <Mike.Carson@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Re:

Hey what's up??!

How's the baby squirrel??  How big is he now?

My sister is going to start popping out kids here pretty soon....she is
getting married in KC on Dec. 16.

Wow...I feel old.....

I am not having babies anytime soon.....I just got out of a 1.5year
relationship, and am not really having too much luck with any other women, so
I may just move to Nepal and become a monk.....

my address is:
P.O. Box 3394
Avon, CO 81620

Later,
Cody

Cody Downard
Vail/Beaver Creek Training & Development Dept.
970.845.2484
email: cdownard@vailresorts.com

>>> <Mike.Carson@enron.com> 11/20/00 08:14AM >>>
What is your address??


Per Lotus Notes it appears that the above counterparty was acquired by Duke.
I have sitting in my files the originals of both theirs and our guarantees.
Do we want to keep these in place, mutually cancel them or what?  We sent
execution documents to the counterparty and never heard back and put it on
the inactive status.


From: Mark Whitney
TheLaw.net Corporation
Homepage: http://www.thelaw.net
Remove: http://www.thelaw.net/remove.htm

     The Bentley Arnage Red Label is a beautiful four door sedan, but it's not for everyone.
http://www.bentleymotors.co.uk/bentley/picture_gallery/bentley_2.jpg
True though it may be that when ordering the Arnage one gets to specify burr walnut, burr oak, bird's eye maple or black lacquer veneer, most would still find the $200K+ sticker price out of reach. Even most of those in a position to do the deal would walk away in the face of a dubious value proposition. After all, burr oak veneer is still veneer.

WHAT DOES THIS HAVE TO DO WITH LEGAL RESEARCH?

     Lawyers from coast-to-coast complain that computer based legal research costs continue to spin out of control. Many, given their firm size, practice area or jurisdiction, simply can no longer justify these onerous annual contracts with West or Lexis. Others have concluded, as one guesses they might with the Bentley, that after peeling back the veneer, these highfalutin compusearchers simply cost more than they are worth.

THEORY vs. REALITY

     As nice as it might be to own a Bentley, it would have been nicer still had they simply provided you with a shiny new Arnage for free while you were in law school, just as our competitors regularly hook law students with free unlimited access, only to yank the needle upon graduation.

     What percentage of attorneys in the real world enjoy unlimited access to WestLaw? Perhaps more to the point, what percentage enjoy unlimited access to those WestLaw resources that their practice truly demands? Are you one of the select few who wants for little or nothing, or are you in a pick-and-choose mode with the overwhelming majority of your colleagues?

     --What do you do when you have to research across state lines?

     --What do you do with a Federal question that properly demands a national look across all thirteen Federal circuits?

     --How do you respond to a legal research industry that likes to market primary jurisdiction packages and thumbs its nose at the reality that you practice in a state like Vermont, for example, a jurisdiction that only issues about 100 new published opinions ANNUALLY, and not surprisingly has yet to consider anything remotely resembling your client's situation?

     Our subscribers snicker to themselves, click a checkbox to search ALL states and they pay not one thin additional dime for the privilege. (See covered jurisdictions listed below the signature line.)

"I AM IN MY SWEATS DOING BILLABLE RESEARCH. I LOVE IT!"

     And there you have our new favorite quote, from a new subscriber leaving a large firm to start her own thing. We have others; lots of them. See, http://www.thelaw.net/references.htm

     What's not to like?

--TheLaw.net is less than $1 a day for an individual annual subscription. Even less per day, per workgroup user. See, http://www.thelaw.net/susbcribe.htm

--Enter a statutory cite into the search engine, and pop up cases construing that item, in one mouse click. See, http://www.thelaw.net/statutes.htm

--Have a case citation you need to know more about? Find cases construing that item in one mouse click. Simple.

--Easy to use? Do you know how to operate a browser, shuttle through little windows folders and do electronic case law research? If so, you're on your way to being a guru using TheLaw.net. If you don't know how to perform these tasks, we will teach at no cost.

--PERFORM UNKNOWN ITEM SEARCHES: Use Boolean and, or, not, near, within, adjacent, nesting, truncation See, Sample Searches: http://www.thelaw.net/searchdemo/home.htm

--PERFORM KNOWN ITEM SEARCHES: Field search by cite, party, counsel, docket, author, date or panel.  See, http://www.thelaw.net/help/operators.htm

WHAT ABOUT WEST AND LEXIS?

     Pay them only when you have to. Will you still use Lexis or West from time to time? Sure. Probably. But perhaps you will get to the point where you use them on the web with your credit card, when you can't otherwise get the answer faster, cheaper elsewhere. Or maybe you like that West or Lexis Primary Jurisdiction Plan that you've been using all these years and you think TheLaw.net can provide a sort of meter insurance for those occasions where the circumstances call for a national look.

--CHOCK FULL. SEARCH TO YOUR HEART'S CONTENT

--Millions of searchable cases - across nearly 200 Federal and state jurisdictions - updated four times daily - unlimited use - Federal and state statutes - State Administrative Codes - CFR - Federal Register - Public Laws - State and Federal Rules - State and Federal Executive Agency Databases - Bill Tracking Tools - Corporate Backgrounders - Thousands of Practice Area Helpers -  Reference Desk - People Finders - Every Major Metro Paper - Nearly 150 Major News Columnists - and much, much more. (Current case jurisdictions, statutes and regulations are listed below the signature line for your convenience.)

ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION PRICES

SOLO EDITION: $345 annually - you and one machine - less than $1 a day
http://www.thelaw.net/subscribe.htm

CONVENIENCE EDITION SALE PRICE: $395 annually - SAVE $100 when you sign up by November 30. Install at work, at home and on your laptop and your paralegal gets TheLaw.net, too - at no extra charge! http://www.thelaw.net/susbcribe.htm

SMALL OFFICE SPECIAL SALE PRICE: $575 annually - SAVE $120 when you sign up by November 30. This is for you, your partner and up to two paralegals http://www.thelaw.net/subscribe.htm

THREE LAWYER WORKGROUP: $795 annually
FOUR LAWYER WORKGROUP: $995 annually
FIVE LAWYER WORKGROUP: $1195 annually

ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS INCLUDE: unlimited access, a lack of meters, no surprises, a 30 day unconditional money back guarantee, unlimited, world class tech and reference support. What's stopping you?

SUBSCRIBE ONLINE - 30 DAY MONEY BACK GUARANTEE

     Sign up risk-free at: http://www.thelaw.net/fulfillment.htm or call in toll free 1.877.4.LAWNET with any questions or if you would like us to book your subscription for you.

     Join us today at TheLaw.net Corporation, where the availability of vast resources is not limited to those with vast resources, and we'll do our level best to ensure your success - whatever it takes.

Regards,

Mark Whitney
President and CEO
TheLaw.net Corporation
San Diego - Chicago, USA
Toll Free 877.452.9638
Fax: 858.554.0968
whitney@thelaw.net
http://www.thelaw.net
"Information Retrieval Solutions for the Legal Profession"

****************************************************************
PRIVACY STATEMENT: TheLaw.net respects your time and we believe this is the fastest, least intrusive method of originating contact with busy professionals.  But we also provide several mechanisms allowing recipients to remove themselves  easily and at no cost. Simply go to: http://www.thelaw.net/remove.htm OR reply  to: remove@thelaw.net and enter the email address that you would like removed in the subject line or call toll free 1.877.452.9638. See also:  http://www.thelaw.net and click "Privacy Statement".
*****************************************************************

IMPORTANT NOTICE: The proprietary searchable case law database included with your subscription is updated four times daily. However, on November 6, 2001, we did a count of entries by jurisdiction. What follows is a list of jurisdictions, the year coverage begins and the number of judicial opinions and orders in each library. A list of statutes and administrative codes is provided far below.

United States Supreme Court, 1900, 213,891

 Federal Circuit, 1982, 18350

 U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Cir., 1950, 14,345
  D.C. Court of Appeals, 1945, 11,546

 U.S. Court of Appeals, 1st Cir., 1930, 18,350
  Maine Supreme Judicial Court, 1996, 1,558
  Mass. Supreme Judicial Court, 1930, 32,329
  Massachusetts Appeals Court
  New Hampshire Supreme Court, 1930, 9,026
  Rhode Island Supreme Court, 1950, 8,899

 U.S. Court of Appeals, 2nd Cir., 1930, 41,598
  Connecticut Supreme Court, 1950, 14,824
  Connecticut Appellate Court
  New York Court of Appeals, 1955, 425,966
  N.Y. Supreme Ct., App. Div. 1st
  N.Y. Supreme Ct., App. Div. 2nd
  N.Y. Supreme Ct., App. Div. 3rd
  N.Y. Supreme Ct., App. Div. 4th
  N.Y. Supreme Ct., App. Term 1st
  N.Y. Supreme Ct., App. Term 2nd
  Vermont Supreme Court, 1930, 7,903

 U.S. Court of Appeals, 3rd. Cir., 1930, 35,052
  U.S. District Court, New Jersey, 1999
  Supreme Court of Delaware, 1950, 24,859
  New Jersey Supreme Court, 1930, 44,830
  N.J. Superior Court, Appellate Division
  U.S. District Court, E.D.Pa., 1997
  Pennsylvania Supreme Court, 1950, 146,850
  Pennsylvania Superior Court
  Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court

 U.S. Court of Appeals, 4th Cir., 1930, 62,794
  U.S. District Court, Maryland, 1999
  Maryland Court of Appeals, 1950, 20,269
  Maryland Special Court of Appeals
  North Carolina Supreme Court, 1945, 57,601
  North Carolina Court of Appeals, 1968
  U.S. District Court, South Carolina, 1999
  South Carolina Supreme Court, 1996, 1,944
  South Carolina Court of Appeals
  Virginia Supreme Court, 1930, 18,174
  Virginia Court of Appeals
  W. Va. Supreme Court. of Appeals, 1991, 7,130

 U.S. Court of Appeals, 5th Cir., 1930, 80,543
  Louisiana Supreme Court, 1980, 57,879
  Louisiana Court of Appeals, 1st Circuit
  Louisiana Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit
  Louisiana Court of Appeals, 3rd Circuit
  Louisiana Court of Appeals, 4th Circuit
  Louisiana Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit
  U.S. District Court, N. Mississippi, 1997
  Mississippi Supreme Court, 1954, 17,890
  Mississippi Court of Appeals
  Texas Supreme Court, 1950, 109,548
  Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
  Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District
  Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District
  Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District
  Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District
  Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District
  Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District
  Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District
  Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District
  Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District
  Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District
  Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
  Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District

 U.S. Court of Appeals, 6th Cir., 1930, 56,247
  Kentucky Supreme Court, 1945, 22,235
  Kentucky Court of Appeals
  Michigan Supreme Court, 1930, 75,322
  Michigan Court of Appeals
  Ohio Supreme Court, 1950, 42,660
  Ohio Court of Appeals, 1st District
  Ohio Court of Appeals, 2nd District
  Ohio Court of Appeals, 3rd District
  Ohio Court of Appeals, 4th District
  Ohio Court of Appeals, 5th District
  Ohio Court of Appeals, 6th District
  Ohio Court of Appeals, 7th District
  Ohio Court of Appeals, 8th District
  Ohio Court of Appeals, 9th District
  Ohio Court of Appeals, 10th District
  Ohio Court of Appeals, 11th District
  Ohio Court of Appeals, 12th District
  Tennessee Supreme Court, 1950, 47,199
  Tennessee Ct. of Appeals, M. Grand Div.
  Tennessee Ct. of Appeals, E. Grand Div.
  Tennessee Ct. of Appeals, W. Grand Div.
  Tennessee Ct. of Crim. App., M. Grand Div.
  Tennessee Ct. of Crim. App. E. Grand Div.
  Tennessee Ct. of Crim. App. W. Grand Div.

U.S. Court of Appeals, 7th Cir., 1930, 39,924
  Illinois Supreme Court, -1985, 31,813
  Illinois Appellate Court, 1st District
  Illinois Appellate Court, 2nd District
  Illinois Appellate Court, 3rd District
  Illinois Appellate Court, 4th District
  Illinois Appellate Court, 5th District
  Indiana Supreme Court, 1940, 41,931
  Indiana Court of Appeals, 1st District
  Indiana Court of Appeals, 2nd District
  Indiana Court of Appeals, 3rd District
  Indiana Court of Appeals, 4th District
  Indiana Court of Appeals, 5th District
  Indiana Tax Court
  Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1945, 27,871
  Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District I
  Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District II
  Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District III
  Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District IV

 U.S. Court of Appeals, 8th Cir., 1930, 47,131
  Arkansas Supreme Court, 1957, 23,949
  Arkansas Court of Appeals
  Iowa Supreme Court, 1995, 3,746
  Iowa Court of Appeals
  Minnesota Supreme Court, 1930, 42,152
  Minnesota Court of Appeals
  Missouri Supreme Court, 1960, 53,104
  Missouri Court of Appeals
  Nebraska Supreme Court, 1965, 13,926
  Nebraska Court of Appeals
  U.S. District Court, North Dakota, 1999
  North Dakota Supreme Court, 1930, 8,672
  North Dakota Court of Appeals
  South Dakota Supreme Court, 1965, 5,424

 U.S. Court of Appeals, 9th Cir., 1941, 73,974
  Alaska Supreme Court, 1960, 8,009
  Alaska Court of Appeals
  Arizona Supreme Court, 1930, 21,928
  Arizona Court of Appeals, 1st Division
  Arizona Court of Appeals, 2nd Division
  U.S. District Court, Central, California, 1998
  California Supreme Court, 1930, 107,137
  California Court of Appeal, 1st Appellate Dt.
  California Court of Appeal, 2nd Appellate Dt.
  California Court of Appeal, 3rd Appellate Dt.
  California Court of Appeal, 4th Appellate Dt.
  California Court of Appeal, 5th Appellate Dt.
  California Court of Appeal, 6th Appellate Dt.
  Hawaii Supreme Court, 1930, 7,116
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
  Idaho Supreme Court, 1965, 7,948
  Idaho Court of Appeals
  Montana Supreme Court, 1993, 2,724
  Nevada Supreme Court, 1950, 7,240
  Oregon Supreme Court, 1950, 71,910
  Oregon Court of Appeals
  Washington Supreme Court, 1935, 52,437
  Washington Court of Appeals, 1st Division
  Washington Court of Appeals, 2nd Division
  Washington Court of Appeals, 3rd Division

 U.S. Court of Appeals, 10th Cir., 1930, 33,347
  Tenth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel
  Colorado Supreme Court, 1930, 29,715
  Colorado Court of Appeals
  Kansas Supreme Court, 1982, 5,937
  Kansas Court of Appeals
  New Mexico Supreme Court, 1930, 17,135
  New Mexico Court of Appeals
  Oklahoma Supreme Court, 1954, 19,714
  Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals
  Oklahoma Court of Appeals
  Utah Supreme Court, 1950, 10,905
  Utah Court of Appeals
  Wyoming Supreme Court, 1993, 1,527

 U.S. Court of Appeals, 11th Cir., 1981, 36,724
  Alabama Supreme Court, 1955, 76,618
  Alabama Court of Civil Appeals
  Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
  Florida Supreme Court, 1950, 114,978
  Florida District Court of Appeal, 1st District
  Florida District Court of Appeal, 2nd District
  Florida District Court of Appeal, 3rd District
  Florida District Court of Appeal, 4th District
  Florida District Court of Appeal, 5th District
  Georgia Supreme Court, 1940, 83,838
  Georgia Court of Appeals

*******************************************
ADMINISTRATIVE CODES - ADMINISTRATIVE CODES

FEDERAL

Code of Federal Regulations
Federal Register
Executive Orders
OMB Circulars
Public Laws

STATE

Alabama Administrative Code
Alaska Administrative Code
Arizona Administrative Code
Arkansas Register
California Code of Regulations
Code of Colorado Regulations
Florida Administrative Code
Rules and Regulations of the State of Georgia
Hawaii Administrative Rules
Idaho Administrative Code
Illinois Administrative Code
Indiana Administrative Code
Iowa Administrative Code
Code of Maine
Code of Maryland Regulations
Code of Massachusetts Regulations
Michigan Administrative Code
Minnesota Rules
Missouri Code of State Regulations
Nebraska Administrative Code
Nevada Administrative Code
New Hampshire Administrative Rules
New York Rules and Regulations
North Carolina Administrative Code and Rules
Ohio Administrative Code
Oregon Administrative Rules
The Pennsylvania Code
South Carolina Code of Regulations
South Dakota Register
Tennessee Rules and Regulations
Texas Administrative Code
Utah Administrative Code
Virginia Administrative Code
Washington Administrative Code
West Virginia Code of State Rules
Wisconsin Administrative Code and Register


Bill,  The contract itself does not have a confidentiality clause, but per Jeff Stone's email, Gulf does consider the contract proprietary information and does not want this info voluntarily disclosed at this time.  I forwarded the email to you earlier.

Concerning the emails etc., as I mentioned before, ECS has a copy of a Confidentiality Agreement that we executed by Gulf,  initialed by me as ECS attorney, but not signed by an officer of ECS.  Our business guys think we executed this agreement.  This CA would cover all information exchanged between Gulf and ECS.  I have asked Russell Badder's to check with Gulf to obtain an executed copy.  Nothing in the CA agreements prohibit me from disclosing the CA. So we could potentially provide the copy of the CA we have to John.  Obviously the correspondence between ECS and Gulf contains the commerical terms of our power deal as we negotiated with Gulf.  Given Jeff's email and the CA copy I have in hand, I would not want to disclose the emails and memo's without Gulf's explicit permission.  Let me know if you have any ideas on the best way to approach this with WFLA.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Bill L. Bryant" <BILL@katzlaw.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Bill+20L+2E+20Bryant+22+20+3CBILL+40katzlaw+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Sunday, July 22, 2001 1:06 PM
To:	Nemec, Gerald
Subject:	WFLA

Gerald,

Where are we in the process of gathering e-mails and other discovery that may be responsive to WFLA's request? Also, can I tell John Haswell that our contract with Gulf does contain a confidentiality clause? We discussed this but I can't remember if we agreed that I could disclose it.

Bill

Katz, Kutter Haigler, Alderman, Bryant & Yon et al
106 East College Avenue, Suite 1200
Tallahassee, FL  32301
(850) 224-9634
www.katzlaw.com
_______________________________________

This transmission is intended to be delivered only to the named addressee(s) and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary, attorney work-product or attorney-client privileged.  If this information is received by anyone other than the named addressee(s), the recipient should immediately notify the sender by E-MAIL and by telephone (850) 224-9634 and obtain instructions as to the disposal of the transmitted material.  In no event shall this material be read, used, copied, reproduced, stored or retained by anyone other than the named addressee(s), except with the express consent of the sender or the named addressee(s).  Thank you.


Brent didn't get much sleep last night and is still under the weather.  He
will be working from home today.  You can get in touch with him via e-mail at
"bhendry@houston.rr.com" or fax him at 832-249-8654.


I haven't looked at this yet...

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/16/2000 01:51
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Gregg Penman                           10/16/2000 11:48 AM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: FW: Form of Note for enovate, L.L.C.

Kay - John Nassos prepared the following form of promissory note for loans to
enovate.  Can this substitute for Bracewell's promisorry note?  Let me know
what you think.

Thanks,

Gregg
---------------------- Forwarded by Gregg Penman/Corp/Enron on 10/16/2000
11:45 AM ---------------------------

j.burns@pecorp.com on 10/16/2000 10:18:38 AM
To: Paul.Burgener@enron.com, Gregg.Penman@enron.com
cc:
Subject: FW: Form of Note for enovate, L.L.C.

FYI and comments.  The attached would be issued for funding short-term needs
of enovate.  Thanks

JAB

> ----------
> From:  Nassos, John G.
> Sent:  Monday, October 16, 2000 10:15 AM
> To:  Burns, Jim
> Subject:  Form of Note for enovate, L.L.C.
>
> Attached pursuant to your request is a form of promissory note for member
> loans to enovate, L.L.C.  Of course, Enron needs to review it and approve
> of the form as well.  As we discussed, the note is set up as a demand note
> that does not bear interest.
>
> Please call if you have any questions (ext. 4413).
>
>  <<Promissory Notes - shell.doc>>
>

----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person
or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential
and/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in
reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient is prohibited.   If you received this in error, please
contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

 - Promissory Notes - shell.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 10/12/2000
06:00 PM ---------------------------

	Carol Coats
	10/12/2000 04:56 PM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Datren Williams Acceptance

What a kind and thoughtful man you always are, Vince....I have always
appreciated
that in you!  I just moved to another position this week - with Sheila
Knudsen in ENA
Compensation, but I will always remember how wonderful you are with the
Associates
and Analysts in the Program, and will miss having the opportunity to touch
base with
you occasionally.  Thank you for being the special man you are!

Carol

P.S.  I doubt that you know who I am, but I had worked with the program for
two years,
having been hired by Mike Smalling in October 1998.  When I first moved to
Houston
(from Ohio) and Enron, I rode the #35 bus for a short while.  You helped me
find Enron the first
day I rode it,  but I didn't know who you were until I saw you at our Super
Saturday
activities.  You will never know how much that assistance meant to me - a
shy,
street-dumb girl from Toledo, Ohio, in a city like Houston, who didn't know
how to
ride a bus!  All of Enron loves you, and I know why!

Vince J Kaminski
10/12/2000 04:32 PM
To: Carol Coats/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Datren Williams Acceptance

Carol,

Thanks.

Vince

	Carol Coats
	10/12/2000 04:09 PM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Datren Williams Acceptance

You are right, Vince....Celeste and I did discuss it, and she approved his
Feb. start date.
Datren does know about that, so it sounds like it is cleared up.

Thanks so much, and we are sorry for the confusion!
Carol

Vince J Kaminski
10/12/2000 03:58 PM
To: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Carol Coats/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Datren Williams Acceptance

Stinson,

I think it's a mistake. It  should be February.

Vince

Stinson Gibner
10/10/2000 08:11 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Datren Williams Acceptance

FYI

---------------------- Forwarded by Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT on 10/10/2000
08:10 PM ---------------------------

	Carol Coats
	09/29/2000 02:36 PM

To: Celeste Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Datren Williams Acceptance

Celeste,

I just received Datren Williams' acceptance with the following note attached:

"My graduation date (Ph.D. Candidate from LSU) is Dec. 2000.  Celeste Roberts
has informed me that I would have the option of starting work Feb. 2001.  I am
under the impression that I will start in Feb. 2001.  My offer letter has a
start date
of Aug. 2001.  If this is a problem, please give me a call.
Looking forward to working at Enron.

Thanks a million,
Datren W."

Please let me know if he may in fact start in Feb. 2001, and if so, do you
have
a specific date for him, or may he choose?

Thanks, Celeste,
Carol


Please speak with Tana.  She will provide you with the full explanation
(online/offline).  SS

	Sheetal Patel
	07/25/2000 11:57 AM

		 To: Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russell
Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: PG&E Core

PG&E Core states that they are a subsidiary of Pacific Gas & Electric Company
who has a master w/ ENA.  Therefore, can we set up PG&E Core w/ a master?

Thank you,

Sheetal :)