---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 04/30/2001
12:05 PM ---------------------------

"Ryan Lee" <ralee@rmi.net> on 04/27/2001 03:56:11 PM
To: "Kerr, Jay" <Jay_Kerr@adc.com>, <matthew.lenhart@enron.com>, "Haig
Newton" <hnewton@analytic-solutions.com>, <danielkbrock@hotmail.com>, "Brian
Beggs" <brbeggs@hotmail.com>, "Ben Abendroth" <bda76@yahoo.com>, "Bagby,
Joel" <jbagby@caprock.com>, "Andy Patton" <andy.patton@wcom.com>
cc:

Subject: Fw: CHARLIE'S SUV

Fellas, Check out "Charley's" ride! You gotta watch him  with both eyes.
Before you know it you'll be pull'n a 66 Chevy.
?
----- Original Message -----
From: Lee, Ryan
To: 'ralee@rmi.net'
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 2:40 PM
Subject: FW: CHARLIE'S SUV

?
-----Original Message-----
From: Waters, Timothy
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 10:14 AM
To: Lee, Ryan; 'MARA04@JUNO.COM'
Subject:  CHARLIE'S SUV

?
 - ChineseSUV.jpg


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                    Palm Solutions
           brought to you by InSync Online
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

             Label Your Way Out of Chaos

Dear Jess,

A mailing to get out the door, corporate videos to
label and deliver, file drawers jammed so full you
couldn't pry them open with a crowbar.

Can you say "chaos?"

Better to say DYMO LabelWriter EL60, the easy way to
organize your office, and your life.

This powerful, versatile PC printer is compatible
with Palm(tm) Desktop. It's also a snap to use.
Simply access the LabelWriter software through your
Palm(tm) Desktop to choose from more than 40
different labels for printing addresses, media, name
tags and file folders. No more trips to the post
office-the EL60 even prints Internet postage. You
can also print addresses and contacts stored in
Microsoft Word, Outlook, Goldmine, ACT! and CardScan.

And you won't spend a cent on toner or ink cartridges
because The EL60 uses thermal print technology.

Find out more:
http://insync-online.p04.com/u.d?vkeSQ2O5ec0Zxb=70

--The InSync Online Team

--------------------------------------------------------
The content of this message is based on your personal
InSync Online profile.

To modify your profile or unsubscribe from InSync
Online return to your InSync Online profile by clicking
on the link below. Or, unsubscribe by replying to this
message, with "unsubscribe" as the subject line of the
message.

(C)2002 Palm, Inc. All rights reserved.
     http://insync-online.p04.com/u.d?8keSQ2O5ec0ZxQ=80

Palm.com
     http://insync-online.p04.com/u.d?vEeSQ2O5ec0ZxV=90

Palm Store
     http://insync-online.p04.com/u.d?vEeSQ2O5ec0ZxK=100

InSync Online
     http://insync-palm.com/insync.dyn?i=838813790&s=ZVae

MyPalm
     http://insync-online.p04.com/u.d?yEeSQ2O5ec0ZxE=120


Make Money Primer
Make BIG Money Working At Home   Let Make Money Primer help you, our program has made more Millionaires than any other home business opportunity in existence.  We have a proven 20 year track record and will help you succeed.   For detailed information on how you can participate, please visit our web site CLICK HERE   Working From Home Is Our Business  We can show you how you can earn an extra $1,500 to $7,000 per month.  How can we be so certain?  Because, thousands of people like yourself are doing it right now! How would you like to walk out to your mailbox and find money day after day?   Look at your earning potential (monthly income)  Month 1    $326 Month 6    $2,069 Month 12    $11,565 Month 24    $24,187 Month 36    $40,781  For detailed information on how you can participate, please visit our web site CLICK HERE  			   [IMAGE]  Think about this...   86% of home-based business owners are happier running their own business instead of working for someone else. 84% recommend working from home to others.  84% plan to still be running their own business in five years.  20% of home entrepreneurs reported that their businesses grossed between $100,000 and $500,000 last year.  14% paid themselves annual salaries of $50,000 to $250,000.  29% work at home with other family members.  60% think their businesses are doing as well or better than they expected.  76% expect their home-based business' revenues to grow this year.

 NOTE: This email was sent to you because your email is part of a targeted opt-in list. If you do not wish to receive further mailings, please click below and enter your email at the bottom of the page. You may then rest-assured that you will never receive another email from us again.  UNSUBSCRIBE ME PLEASE   #022154


Over the past week, many Enron employees have volunteered their time to help
with the city-wide flood relief efforts. Thank you!

There are many agencies that need your help this weekend.  We have included a
list of agencies that are looking for volunteers over the weekend. If you are
interested in donating your time and energy, please call the individual
contact phone number listed for each project.

Thank you for volunteering your time to help the Houston community during
this time of great need. Please feel free to send this information to other
friends and family who may be interested.

Please visit the Enron flood website for additional information at
home.enron.com/flood <http://home.enron.com/flood>.

City-wide Volunteer Opportunities

Sign-up information and contact numbers are listed for each individual
project.

American Red Cross: Caseworkers desperately needed - training at Red Cross
will take place on Friday at 1 p.m. and 4 p.m. - The Red Cross needs more
than 100 caseworkers. You must be trained before you can volunteer; the
training takes 2 hours. Please contact 713-526-8300.

Salvation Army: Volunteers are needed immediately for around the clock help
to sort donations, process and distribute, serve food, and donate plastic
ware/paper products.  All volunteers should contact Darlene at 713/692-4186.

Neighborhood Services, Inc:  Need volunteers to assist seniors with clean
up.  Anticipated manpower needs include helping to remove wet carpet,
furniture and other soiled materials, clean up of debris, minor and major
repair work, and distribution of emergency supplies.  Please call
713-669-5329 by 2:00 p.m., Friday, June 15 if you are interested in
volunteering on Saturday, June 16 for this project.  Teams of 2-3 people
would be assigned to each home or family.

United Methodist Coalition on Houston Flood Relief:  Teams of volunteers are
needed to aid families and individuals in dealing with damage and distress
caused by the flooding.  Please call the Flood Hotline at 713-822-8815 if you
wish to volunteer or make donations.

San Jacinto Baptist Church, corner of Flint and Muscatang (off of I-10 East,
exit Mercury - stay on the feeder road and turn right on Flint): Volunteers
are needed to help run the shelter from 5 p.m. to 5 a.m. - tough hours to
fill! Please call Heather Hughes at Second Baptist Church to get more
information - 713-465-3408.

Bridge Over Troubled Waters, Pasadena:  This shelter for women and children
has had significant roof and water damage.  Volunteers are needed to help
with repairs.  Call 713-472-0753.

Houston Food Bank: Volunteers are needed to help sort food for the American
Red Cross and Salvation Army Food Shelters. Call Carol Gooden at 713-547-8609.

Donations Needed for Agencies Across the City
Please drop off donations at the InfoZone on the Plaza Java side of the Enron
Building lobby from 11 a.m. -
2 p.m., Monday, June 18 through Friday, June 22.

Items needed:
? toiletries
? paper products
? blankets
? pillows
? non-perishable food
? pet food
? formula
? diapers
? cribs
? bedding (baby and adult)
? bug repellant
? clothing: socks, undergarments, large size shoes


We have the following Tenn disounts for the 22-26th  even though we may not use them.

Z0 to Carthage meter #010031 on k#2891  $.1022 plus fuel.

Any Z1 or Z0 point to Z6-Tewksbury on k#2891  $.3522 plus fuel.


Here is a list for the schedulers downstairs...we will get you a more completed one later.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Saldana, Alex
Sent:	Friday, November 16, 2001 3:54 PM
To:	Rangel, Ina
Subject:	STENO NUMBERS

INA,

THIS IS WHAT WE HAVE FOR NOW.  MONDAY EVERYONE THAT DOES NOT HAVE A STENO WILL.  IF YOU NEED THE LIST OF NEW STENOS PLEASE  CONTACT BRANDEE JACKSON BECAUSE I WILL BE OUT ON VACATION.

THANKS.  SORRY IT TOOK SO LONG.

Alex Saldana
Administrative Assistant
Enron Networks
(713) 345-7389


If so, what time?


Attached is a breakdown of duties and the person assigned to carry them out.  Please look it over and let me know of any neccessary changes or additions.

Just a reminder:

Last week Murray requested that the group work up standardized documentation describing the steps necessary to complete each of the duties listed in the attached job list.  He would like the information on his desk Monday morning.

If you would like assistance with production of the documentation, I would be happy to help.  Please get the info to me by noon tomorrow (Friday).

Thanks,
Kathy


Please let me know if this request is OK?

Thanks,
Stephanie
---------------------- Forwarded by Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT on 10/12/2000
11:27 AM ---------------------------

Brant Reves
10/12/2000 11:19 AM
To: Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Utilicorp United (ADM03769) requesting ability to transact UK
crude and oil products

We are ok with this request for Utilicorp United, Inc.

brant

From:  Stephanie Sever
     10/12/2000 10:52 AM

To: Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Utilicorp United (ADM03769) requesting ability to transact UK crude
and oil products

---------------------- Forwarded by Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT on 10/12/2000
10:48 AM ---------------------------

From:  Mary Griff Gray
     10/12/2000 10:20 AM

To: Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Utilicorp United (ADM03769) requesting ability to transact UK crude
and oil products

Tom -

What do you think?

Thanks,
Griff
x35753


Do you need a HUG??    :o)

Crystal Hyde
05/12/2000 09:29 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Transport P&L

That would be the coolest thing that has happened to me all week!!  not
really, but I just wanted to show some enthusiam which is really hard to do
on friday at 9am.  Let me know when it is done so I can get me numbers from
it ...okie dokie??

Thanks


Steve,

Attached please find the pro-regulation speech.  We have a studio reserved
between 4 and 5 PM today.  If it's possible to get comments on the speeches
before the conference call, we would really appreciate it.  I'll forward the
edited deregulation speech to you shortly.

Thanks,

Liz

 <<Pro-Regulation speech.doc>>

 - Pro-Regulation speech.doc


Dear Vince,

Please find the following description of the program that I would like to
raise additional funding for.  I will follow up today with a phone call to
answer any questions you may have.

As always we appreciate your time and support.

Thanks,
Jozef

The Eastern European students at MIT Sloan School of Management are
preparing an Eastern European week to be held in March 2001.  The one-week
long program will familiarize our classmates with many of the countries
that are going through the post communist transformation. As you well know,
Eastern Europe has a great deal of opportunities for many companies.
Unfortunately, it also presents many obstacles that make most of the
opportunities difficult to capture.

Because we believe that we can help to eliminate some of these obstacles,
we want to bring the Eastern European experience to MIT Sloan School of
Management.  Familiarizing the future business leaders with the countries
is only one step toward reforming Eastern Europe, but we believe it is
worth our time and effort.

During the week, we plan to bring series of lectures addressing the
business environment in Eastern Europe.  We want to emphasize especially
the success stories from Eastern Europe.  Such companies as Enron,
Volkswagen, ExxonMobil, GM, and GE have entered the Eastern European market
and show commitment to stay in it.  In at least one panel discussion with
academic experts and industry participants we hope to let everyone know
that Eastern Europe is a real place for business.

In addition to the educational activities, we are preparing number of
cultural events that will introduce the culture of this area.

The scope of our program depends greatly on the funds we will be able to
raise from our sponsors.  In return, we plan to advertise our sponsors in
every activity we will do.  We will make banners and any other appropriate
advertising as desired by the sponsor.  Should a sponsor be willing to send
a speaker for the panel discussion or to give a speech/lecture we would
appreciate the enrichment to our program.

The advertising will reach nearly 700 Sloan students and faculty.  In
addition, the advertising will reach all newly admitted students, as they
will visit our campus for the AdMIT day (an official program to sell our
school to the admitted students).


Start Date: 1/6/02; HourAhead hour: 11;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  Variances detected.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002010611.txt

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 11 / Preferred: 413.54 / Final: 413.51)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: SCE1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 1/6/02
  SC_ID: ENRJ


Rice/Enron Finance Seminar Participants:
Luigi Zingales will present a paper co-authored with Raghuram G. Rajan, entitled "The Great Reversals: The Politics of Financial Development in the 20th Century."  The full text of the paper is available in PDF form on the seminar website:http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~jgsfss The baton for organizing the seminar series has been passed from Barbara Ostdiek to myself.  If you have questions regarding the series, please contact me (wangfa@rice.edu or 713-348-5404).
As we have done in the past, we will post the abstract and a downloadable version of the paper (if available) to the website a week or two before the seminar.  The website will also provide a link to the speaker's homepage so you can access his or her biographical information.  If the paper is not available at the website, I will send a hardcopy to interested Jones School faculty, to Felecia Jones (Economics), Sorin Sorescu (University of Houston), and Vince Kaminski (Enron).
I will e-mail an announcement before each seminar, reminding you of the seminar date, time, and location.  The distribution list will include everyone that receives this e-mail.  Please let me know if you would like to be deleted from the mailing list or if you know of someone who should be added.
Albert
Fu-Kuo Albert Wang
Assistant Professor
Jones Graduate School of Management -- MS 531
Rice University
6100 Main Street
Houston, TX 77005
Phone: 713-348-5404
Fax:     713-348-5251
email: wangfa@rice.eduhttp ://www.ruf.rice.edu/~wangfa/


How about 3:00 pm on Friday??

Holly Keiser
Enron Americas
Legal Department - EB 3887
713-345-7893 (ph)
713-646-3490 (fx)
Holly.Keiser@enron.com

	Sara Shackleton@ECT
	06/05/2001 11:19 AM

		 To: Holly Keiser/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Schedule meeting with Mark Taylor for Thursday, June 7

Holly:  Please see Christian's message below.  Can you reschedule please?

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 06/05/2001 11:17 AM -----

	Christian Yoder/ENRON@enronXgate
	06/05/2001 11:07 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Schedule meeting with Mark Taylor for Thursday, June 7

3:30 Thursday, Central Time happens to fall exactly to the minute on a time
when I have to be on the phone with Mark Haedicke and Elizabeth Sager.  I
cannot move that time.  Can we go earlier or move it to Friday?  I am trying
to get the cases to you as soon as I can. ----cgy

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Shackleton, Sara
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 7:07 AM
To: Yoder, Christian
Subject: Re: Schedule meeting with Mark Taylor for Thursday, June 7

Christian:  Please mark this time on your calendar to speak with Mark T.:
3:30 Houston/1:30 Portland.  We'll call you.

Will Pat Boylston send over 1 or 2 cases for us to review prior to the call?

Thanks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 06/05/2001 09:00 AM -----

	Holly Keiser@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT 06/05/2001 08:36 AM 	  To: Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT  cc:   Subject: Re: Schedule meeting with Mark Taylor
for Thursday, June 7 << OLE Object: StdOleLink >>

Sorry... you mentioned that in the subject line.

3:30 pm on Thursday.

Holly Keiser
Enron Americas
Legal Department - EB 3887
713-345-7893 (ph)
713-646-3490 (fx)
Holly.Keiser@enron.com

	Sara Shackleton@ECT 06/05/2001 08:19 AM 	  To: Holly
Keiser/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT  cc:   Subject: Re: Schedule
meeting with Mark Taylor for Thursday, June 7 << OLE Object: StdOleLink >>

I'd like to meet Thursday, June 7

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Holly Keiser@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT 06/05/2001 07:34 AM 	  To: Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT  cc:   Subject: Re: Schedule meeting with Mark Taylor
for Thursday, June 7 << OLE Object: StdOleLink >>

Sara -- I've scheduled 3:00 PM following today's Legal/Credit meeting.  If
you prefer later, please let me know.

Thanks!
Holly Keiser
Enron Americas
Legal Department - EB 3887
713-345-7893 (ph)
713-646-3490 (fx)
Holly.Keiser@enron.com

	Sara Shackleton@ECT 06/04/2001 06:12 PM 	   To: Holly
Keiser/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT  cc:   Subject: Schedule meeting
with Mark Taylor for Thursday, June 7

Does Mark have time in the afternoon to meet with me and Christian Yoder
(Portland - 2 hours earlier than CST)?  The topic is "Washington State
PUD's".  I'd schedule about an hour.  Thanks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Shirley,

We have not accepted him yet. I shall speak with him alone.

Vince

Shirley Crenshaw
08/01/2000 08:13 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Time

Vince:

David Dupre is wanting to meet with all the Research heads for a rotation
schedule.  Are you interested and do you want me to set it up?

---------------------- Forwarded by Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT on 08/01/2000
08:10 AM ---------------------------

David P Dupre
07/31/2000 05:26 PM
To: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Time

Hi,

I wanted to inquire as to which day(s) might be convenient to meet with Vince
and his colleagues.

Many thanks
David


Weather Headlines
Wednesday February 6, 2002
More troughing in the East and ridging in the West. Pattern developing as
advertised, but will the cold air materialize?
The Southern stream storm track is alive and well and should continue to be
so for the next couple of weeks. All of the models point to the potential
of healthy winter storms in the midst of a warmer than normal temperature
pattern. The lack of realized cold continues to frustrate me as once again
the air simply is not that frigid. We are still below normal relative to
normal over much of the South and West. In the West, it is due to high
pressure trapped in the Intermountain region while in the South it is in
response to inclement weather along the storm track. The North and East are
back into a warming mode in spite of the fact that a trough will reform in
the East. Upstream over the Western half of Canada, it is just not that
cold anymore. The MRF is up to its old tricks of a sharp cooling "just past
this period" and the Canadian still insists on a moderate intensity high
coming down this weekend. It may well turn cooler, but certainly not in an
excessive way. The five day numbers will be warming, not cooling.
The 6-10 day period appears to be much more favorable for talk of storms
rather than any excessive cold. We are rapidly running out of time for that
as normal temperatures are now on their way up. We may not see anything
extreme, but I still see some potential for the East being slightly below
normal for the period if the Canadian is on the right track. The models do
seem to show ridging to continue out West. It has been a very slow process,
but moderation should continue.
For the period Wednesday February 6 through Sunday February 10, expect the
following temperature trends:
Average 4 to 6-degrees below normal: Gulf Coast, Southeast...
Average 1 to 3-degrees below normal: Intermountain West, Desert SW,
California, Mississippi Valley...
Average 1 to 3- degrees above normal: Mid-Atlantic, Southern Plains..
Average 4 to 6-degrees above normal: Ohio Valley, Rockies, Central Plains
Average 7 to 10-degrees above normal: Northern Plains, Great Lakes...
Andy Weingarten, Meteorologist APB Energy / True Quote


Telecom Companies Mtg To Discuss Bandwidth Trading
 By Michael Rieke

 03/23/2000
 Dow Jones Energy Service
 (Copyright (c) 2000, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

 HOUSTON -(Dow Jones)- A group of telecommunications companies is meeting
Thursday to open discussions
 on industry standards for bandwidth trading.

 Set up by CompTel, a Washington, D.C., trade association that represents the
competitive telecommunications
 industry, the meeting will initiate discussion among companies that are or
probably will be active in a nascent
 bandwidth trading market that could be worth billions or trillions of
dollars a year.

 Bandwidth is the capacity to move data over telecommunications networks.

 Russell Frisby Jr., president of CompTel, told Dow Jones Newswires that the
trade group's members asked it to
 get involved in the discussion of bandwidth trading.

 The fact that CompTel is involved in discussion on bandwidth trading shows
that people are taking the idea
 seriously, said Steven Kamman, a telecommunications analyst with CIBC World
Markets.

 "This year bandwidth trading will move from a theory to practice," he said.

 Before that can happen, the industry needs to set ground rules for trading,
and that will be a major topic of
 discussion at the meeting.

 It comes as no surprise that Enron Corp. (ENE) will be at the meeting. For
nearly a year, the company has been
 promoting the idea of setting up a liquid market for trading bandwidth under
standard terms and conditions.

 Tom Gros, vice president of global bandwidth trading for Enron, has two
items he thinks should be at the top of
 the meeting's agenda.

 The first is establishing an industry organization to set the standard terms
and conditions for trading bandwidth as
 a commodity. The second is setting a North American benchmark for trading.

 The bandwidth trading organization, or BTO, should consist of companies
"with actual financial risk" in
 bandwidth trading, Gros said. That means the group would consist mainly of
major telecommunications carriers,
 the bandwidth producers.

 But others also have financial risk in bandwidth, he said, including some
major Wall Street players and bandwidth
 consumers.

 Gros said some Wall Street players have already begun trading bandwidth, but
he wouldn't identify them. A
 source with a Wall Street investment bank, who didn't want to be identified,
said Gros's claim was a stretch.

 Banks with trading operations are consumers, using telecommunications
bandwidth to move stock market and
 commodity trading data internationally among offices, he said. But they
aren't actively trading bandwidth as they
 do established commodities.

 Major consumers of bandwidth would include large Internet service providers,
or ISPs. Gros said they should
 also be included in the BTO.

 Before bandwidth can be quickly and easily traded domestically, the market
needs a North American benchmark
 that sets technical specifications, Gros said.

 In domestic crude oil trading, the benchmark is West Texas Intermediate,
which must meet standards for
 American Petroleum Institute specific gravity and for sulfur content.

 In the bandwidth market, standards would be set for quality-of-service
issues like errored seconds, severely
 errored seconds and unavailable seconds, Gros said. Those standards would
cover corruption of data
 transmitted over bandwidth as well as the availability of bandwidth.

 Enron has suggested that the benchmark cover the route between New York and
Los Angeles, which ranks
 among the routes with the most data traffic in North America.

 Agreeing on standards will be the toughest job to accomplish at the meeting,
said Ken Epps, senior vice
 president for strategic marketing for Williams Communications Group (WCG),
which will also be represented at
 the meeting.

 The technical standards for bandwidth trading can't be set so high that they
limit the number of companies that
 will trade, Epps said. If the standards limit liquidity, the market won't
develop.

 "Everybody needs to walk away feeling that it's a standard they can live
with, that they can build their business
 around," Epps said.

 That goal can be met - it's just a question of how long it will take, he
said. "I don't expect it will be settled at the
 first meeting of the CompTel group, but it will be the kickoff."

 Williams plans to keep those discussion going next month at its own "carrier
forum" to discuss bandwidth trading
 standards, Epps said.

 About a year ago, when Enron first proposed trading bandwidth as a
commodity, Williams officials were quoted
 as being skeptical about the idea.

 But last month, the company announced it would take a leading role in
developing a market for trading
 bandwidth. The Williams carrier meeting shows that the company is now
serious about bandwidth trading.

 Williams is inviting "the real players, the MCI WorldComs (WCOM), the Qwests
(Q), the AT&Ts (T)," Epps
 said. "It's about people who have the assets and how we use these to
advantage the marketplace, how we build
 a good powerful market model."

 CompTel's Frisby, Enron's Gros and Williams's Epps wouldn't discuss which
other companies were attending the
 meeting in Washington. But Dow Jones Newswires was able to obtain a list of
attendees.

 Among the invitees are companies with experience trading energy commodities
- Dynegy Inc. (DYN); El Paso
 Energy Corp. (EPG); Columbia Transmission Communications, a unit of Columbia
Energy Group (CG); and
 Koch Industries, which has investments in energy and telecommunications.

 A surprise on the list is MCI WorldCom. Some industry sources have said the
company opposes the idea of
 bandwidth trading under standard terms and conditions.

 An industry analyst, who didn't want to be identified, said MCI WorldCom's
participation in the meeting is
 indicative of changing attitudes in the telecom carrier industry about
bandwidth trading.

 Retail marketing groups within telecommunications carrier companies don't
like the idea of a liquid bandwidth
 trading market, the analyst said.

 Such a market could turn retail customers into wholesale customers. For
example, a retail customer like an ISP
 could go to a liquid bandwidth market and buy at wholesale prices, he said.

 Also on the attendee list are telecom carriers Teleglobe (TGO) and Global
Crossing Ltd. (GBLX); NTT
 America, a wholly owned subsidiary of Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corp.;
and Progress Telecom, a unit
 of the electric utility Florida Progress Corp. (FPC).

 Also on the list is recent IPO Universal Access Inc. (UAXS), a company that
matches carriers that have excess
 capacity with carriers that need extra capacity.

 LighTrade, a start-up company setting up pooling points to allow bandwidth
trading, was also invited.

 Commodity traders are represented by Sakura Dellscher, Amerex, Prebon
Yamane, AIG Telecom and the New
 York Mercantile Exchange.

 Two consulting companies, Andersen Consulting and PricewaterhouseCoopers,
were also invited.


yes

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Palmer, B. Scott
Sent:	Monday, December 10, 2001 8:44 AM
To:	Love, Phillip M.; Mills, Bruce; McLaughlin Jr., Errol; Winfree, O'Neal D.; Giron, Darron C.; Taylor, Joey; Ryder, Patrick
Subject:	FW: Poker night

Who is in and who is out? We need to know today, so if you are out we can get a replacement. Everyone, please respond yes or no. Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Palmer, B. Scott
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 1:15 PM
To:	Love, Phillip M.; Mills, Bruce; McLaughlin Jr., Errol; Winfree, O'Neal D.; Giron, Darron C.; Taylor, Joey; Ryder, Patrick
Subject:	Poker night

Does anyone object to having poker night on the 13th? The 20th is very close to Christmas. Please respond ASAP. Thanks.

This map is NOT to scale!

 << OLE Object: PBrush >>


These are fine.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	McDaniel, Kirk
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 1:36 PM
To:	Allen, Phillip K.; O'rourke, Tim; Frolov, Yevgeny
Subject:	Topic Framework Deliverable - Sign-Off for Acceptance
Importance:	High

Gentlemen

Good day. I hope all is going well.

If I do not hear from you by COB tomorrow I will take your silence as acceptance and that their are no non-conformities to prevent acceptance of this deliverable. This action is necessary as contractually we are coming to the end of the acceptance period for this deliverable.

Good news is that this deliverable and the High level design deliverable are the last two deliverables for the Design Phase of the project. Thanks

Cheers
Kirk
---------------------- Forwarded by Kirk McDaniel/HOU/EES on 10/23/2001 03:31 PM ---------------------------

Kirk McDaniel
10/19/2001 08:39 AM
To:	Phillip K Allen/Enron@EnronXGate, Tim O'Rourke/Enron@EnronXGate, Yevgeny Frolov/Enron@EnronXGate
cc:	Ed McMichael/Enron@EnronXGate, Dutch Quigley/Enron@EnronXGate
Subject:	Topic Framework Deliverable - Sign-Off for Acceptance

Phillip/Tim/Yevgeny
The attached zip file contains the 10 topic frameworks for sign off. Phillip you have reviewed these documents and given them the thumbs up prior to my input. The email below from Monica summarizies my minor input and after reading Monica email, if no red flags or concerns or raised you can again give your approval without necessarily reviewing the attachments again.

Tim and Yevegeny (If possible), please review the attachment, the email below and provide input no later then COB 10/22. Thanks

Cheers
Kirk

Note: Please notice that Accenture is putting how long it takes them to complete tasks in their emails to us.

 - Topic Framework_Final.zip << File: Topic Framework_Final.zip >>
---------------------- Forwarded by Kirk McDaniel/HOU/EES on 10/19/2001 08:29 AM ---------------------------

monica.l.brown@accenture.com on 10/18/2001 11:04:02 AM
To:	kmcdani@enron.com
cc:	sheri.a.righi@accenture.com
Subject:	Topic Framework Updates!

Hi Kirk,

Here are the answers to some of your questions and concerns on the Topic
Frameworks.  These updates, along with discussions with SMEs, took a total
of one hour.

Accounting and Reporting - (1) Deal Flow - <<According to Berney Aucoin>>
there is no difference between an Orginator/Marketer  on the deal flow,
they stated that a deal is a deal and it is the same for everyone.  (2)
Roles associated within the Desk - <<According to Berney Aucoin >> Admin
support and Commerical support should not be added.  We are concentrating
on the major roles within a desk, any more granular could be inaccurate
because it is different for every company.  Admin support - answers the
phones and Commerical support runs the books in the back office.

Commodity Fundamentals - (1) Broker fees and Margin calls were added in the
overview, <<According to Berney Aucoin>> it was worth mentioning, but
wholesale is exempt from fees and taxes.  (2) Industrial, Retail and
Wholesale was added as an i.e., by consumption by consumer

Organizational Structure - (1) Communication - Inter/Intra department
communications were added into the Challenges of Managing Trading Function
and Trading System. Inter department communication (i.e., between
departments within organization) and Intra department communications (i.e.,
between roles on a desk after a trade/deal) (between desks, internal
communication between Marketer, Originator, Structurer and Trader, after a
trade and reconciling position reports)

Risk Management Inputs - Consequences within VaR guidelines was added to
"Trading outside of prescribed VaR guidelines

Swaps - Types of credit classifications was added to Credit Review under
Protecting Againist Loss.

The note for the references used was included on every topic framework -
*Note: Please note in your assignments when using additional resources
other than the BRM course material and your own knowledge. Please do not
copy and paste from Derivatives 1 or any other resource material. This will
significantly help us deter any copyright infringements. Thank you

Let me know if you have any questions!

Thanks,
Monica L. Brown
Accenture
PDP Experienced Analyst
Houston - 2929 Allen Parkway
Direct Dial: +1 713 837 1749
VPN & Octel: 83 / 71749
Fax: +1 713 257 7211
email: monica.l.brown@accenture.com

This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged or confidential information.  If you have received it in error,
please notify the sender immediately and delete the original.  Any other
use of the email by you is prohibited.

---------------------- Forwarded by Kirk McDaniel/HOU/EES on 10/19/2001 08:29 AM ---------------------------

sheri.a.righi@accenture.com on 10/18/2001 11:11:04 AM
To:	kmcdani@enron.com
cc:	donald.l.barnhart@accenture.com, monica.l.brown@accenture.com
Subject:	Topic Frameworks - Updates Completed

Kirk -

Thank you for your timely feedback. Per our discussions, we have updated
all of the topic frameworks and attached them below. In addition, Monica
has sent you an email describing the changes she has made and explanations
around why some changes weren't made (SME's responses to your questions).

These updates, along with discussions with SMEs, took a total of one hour.

(See attached file: Topic Framework_Final.zip)

Sheri A. Righi
Accenture
Human Performance Service Line
Hartford - One Financial Plaza
Direct Dial: 860 756 2245
VPN & Octel: 765 2245
e-mail: sheri.a.righi@Accenture.com

This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged or confidential information.  If you have received it in error,
please notify the sender immediately and delete the original.  Any other
use of the email by you is prohibited.
 - Topic Framework_Final.zip << File: Topic Framework_Final.zip >>


I go away for a day and come back to yet another $40 million of PGE exposure.
I guess the lesson is to not go away. Where does this end? This is a painful
way to learn about derivative credit exposure. Please inform all "deal doers"
at EES that they better have RAC review their deals (Mercury) in detail
before they sign. This is more out of control than anything else we have at
Enron.

 Rick


No, this is not deja vu.  I am now ready to confirm this deal, however, it
has the wrong energy type.  Can you change this and let me know.

Thanks!


Necessary items for the baby are down below with blue web links.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Wahlstrom, Scottie J" <Scottie.J.Wahlstrom@Williams.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, March 07, 2002 2:13 PM
To:	Germany, Chris; Immer, Ingrid
Cc:	Heiser, Suzanne J; Catlett, Laurie E; Shaull, Barbara G; Smith, Elsie F
Subject:	RE: INGRID'S BABY SHOWER

Chris,
We will DEFINITELY pass the word and be sure to tell  anyone that calls
wondering what the BABY will need.  And of course we will try and get you a
little something from your baby wish list too.

I can just see the baby now....sitting on HIS Harley, watching HIS big
screen TV, daydreaming about the lake and HIS blue wave boat, while
wondering which one of HIS cars Mommie will be "borrowing" when she picks
him up from day care...or maybe he has visions of Nanny Terri Hatcher or
Nanny Natilie Imbruglia driving him in one of HIS cars.

Scottie
> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Germany, Chris [SMTP:Chris.Germany@enron.com]
> Sent:	Thursday, March 07, 2002 1:03 PM
> To:	Scottie.J.Wahlstrom@williams.com; Ingrid Immer (E-mail)
> Subject:	RE: INGRID'S BABY SHOWER
>
>
> I've tried to send this back to Scottie twice.  Would you please forward
> it to her?  She will be needing this list.
>
> Thanks
>
>
> >
> > 	I don't know if she has registered yet so I've come up with a few
> items that I think the baby will need.  Please share this humble list with
> the appropriate people.  I do work for a bankrupt company you know.
> >
> > 	Item			Price
> > 	2002 Range Rover 	$64,896
> http://www.edmunds.com/new/2002/landrover/rangerover/index.html
> > 	2002 Porsche Boxster	$50,000
> http://www.edmunds.com/new/2002/porsche/boxster/index.html
> > 	Terri Hatcher		$$$
> http://www.eonline.com/Facts/People/Bio/0,128,19,00.html
> > 	Natilie Imbruglia		$$$$
> http://www.eonline.com/Facts/People/Bio/0,128,67918,00.html
> > 	Toshiba Big Screen	$2,189
> http://electronics.cnet.com/electronics/0-6342372-1304-7297512.html?tag=pd
> tl-list
> > 	Harley Davidson		$21,000
> http://www.harley-davidson.com/motorcycles/motorcycles_detail.jsp?PRODUCT%
> 3C%3Eprd_id=432813&FOLDER%3C%3Efolder_id=440145&bmUID=1015517216967
> > 	Blue Wave Boat		$18,000
> http://striperguide.tripod.com/bluewave.htm
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
> and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
> the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
> others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
> authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
> reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
> delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto)
> are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or
> evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of
> its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
> be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
> otherwise. Thank you.
> **********************************************************************


Start Date: 4/25/01; HourAhead hour: 21;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.


You need to speak with the developer.  There is no way to control the
inclusion of "Other Agreements" in the "All Agreements" section as the system
is currently designed.

I am not disagreeing with you; I learned this the hard way a few months ago.
The system is confusing.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Tana Jones
	03/14/2001 05:47 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: JP Morgan Securities Inc. (Electronic Order)

It has been my understanding that the first section is supposed to be for
master swap agreements only.  Having other documents listed in that section
may be misleading to some parties who may misconstrue their use for general
trading purposes, such as Global Contracts.  That is why we created the
"Other Agreements" section, to house these other agreements.  My
understanding isthat the only reason other agreements has been listed in the
Master Swap Agreements Section is that they have been done so erroneously.
The drop down were not created too artfully created, allowing wrong
agreements to be put in Master Swap Agreements, which has been
proliferating.  If my understanding is not correct, than when did the
intentional use of that first section change?  I think putting all agreement
is a very bad idea.

	Sara Shackleton
	03/14/01 05:35 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: JP Morgan Securities Inc. (Electronic Order)

Tana:  I think the agreement is listed in Section 1 (all agreements) which is
not just Master Swap Agreements.  It is also listed in the approprate Section
13 entry.
Hope you're enjoying Canada!

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Tana Jones
	03/14/2001 04:26 PM

		 To: Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: (bcc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT)
		 Subject: JP Morgan Securities Inc. (Electronic Order)

The above counterparty has been created in the Financial Trading Agreements
Database and is listed as a master swap agreement, and it's not.  It is an
Electronic Trading Agreement and needs to be moved down to "Other
Agreements".  Please let me know when that is done and I will delete the
entry in  the master swap agreement database.  Thanks!


Guys, your teams did a great job managing a very difficult situation with
very few material effects to the organization.  It is noticed and appreciated
please pass on to your organization if you feel appropriate.

Regards
Delainey


thanks


Dan Staines and Joe Conner focus on Wholesale activities, you can work this out with Rick/Jim. I'm fine with the rest.

 From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 1:52 PM
To:	Dietrich, Janet; Shapiro, Richard; Delaney, David; Kitchen, Louise; Lavorato, John
Subject:	RE: Govt Affairs Org Chart

Janet -

1.	The best split is probably just 50/50 on personnel.  While everyone is in a specific box on the org chart, many if not all of the people are flexible enough that they can cover different roles.  The $ on outside services may be able to be split differently going forward (for example, if EES wants something specific on a state PUC matter).
2.	In terms of approving outside service expenditures, I would like to sit down with you, Louise, and Rick to work out what the best method of working through the approvals.  I will try and set up some time the first week of December.
4.	I have put Steve Montovano in the NE Gas box.  This will increase the budget by $400k (based on historical figures).  I have attached a new org chart to represent this change.

Also, Dan Staines (who is not on the Org Chart) has an Employment contract that ends 6/12/2002.  Dan has been working on Florida and Northeast RTO matters and continues to help East Power with the NYISO TCC auction.  We can sever him, but his contract will need to be paid off ($87k).  Govt Affairs also has a contract for support with Joe Connor (ex-Southern exec) to support our SE activities.  I am trying to get a copy of the contract, but I think that it is in place until 8/02.  My recommendation is to use these guys through their contracts instead of a large payment today.

Thanks,

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dietrich, Janet
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 12:00 PM
To:	Shapiro, Richard
Cc:	Delaney, David; Steffes, James D.; Kitchen, Louise; Lavorato, John
Subject:	FW: Govt Affairs Org Chart

EES is fine with the Org. chart below. I understand the $6.4 million is total for both ENA & EES. Comments:

1.) Need a recommended split of the $6.4 million for ENA/EES.
2.) I understand the $6.4 million includes $0 for Outside Services. The OOC of ENA/EES needs to approve as these services are needed.
3.) The $6.4 million does include legacy real estate costs. Jim Fallon is the coordination point on our real estate costs-is this on his radar screen?
4.) We need to reconcile what we do with Steve Montovano. Because both ENA/EES want to utilize him, I might suggest leaving him in the regulatory group so that both groups can effectively utilize him. Louise/Jim- are you both OK with this? If so, Rick/Jim, I would suggest putting him in the NE Gas Box.
5.) Rick, I understand you're talking with Kean/Whalley on handling the Washington office activity in Corp. I agree.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 6:12 PM
To:	Dietrich, Janet
Cc:	Shapiro, Richard
Subject:	Govt Affairs Org Chart

Janet --

Here is the org chart that captures our discussions.  I think that this org and the # of people is the lowest level that can even try to meet the combined needs of ENA and EES.

Total headcount = 21.  The personnel cost = $6.4 MM (total for ENA and EES).

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Jim

 << File: ENA EES Govt Affairs 11.17.01.ppt >>


Please provide interview feedback (YES, NO, MAYBE) on the following
candidate(s).    If NO, briefly state why and include if this person is still
a good fit for Enron and we'll search other opportunities for them.    If
MAYBE, give time frame of when you'll have a final answer.     (All NO
external candidates will receive a "Decline" letter.  If internal, a phone
call from me).

Joy M. Werner, interviewed on Thursday, May 10, 2001
Meghan Watkins, interviewed on Wednesday, May 9, 2001

Thanks,
Jamie Wachel
Enron Staffing


Actually I have thought about and I would prefer to just rent.
I look forward to purchasing a house in future or something substantially bigger.
From an investment perspective- I think we will have other opportunities in future.
we can talk tonite too if you want
ily
kay

From:	Dutch Quigley/ENRON@enronXgate on 10/30/2001 10:51 AM
To:	Kay Quigley/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject:	RE: good morning

it is heading south alright , all of the options are out of the money so it really does not matter
ok on the rest , we need to talk about the living arrangement and see what we think as too
do we want to buy or jsut rent , can we talk tonight ??

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Quigley, Kay
Sent:	Tuesday, October 30, 2001 9:38 AM
To:	Quigley, Dutch
Subject:	good morning

how low can it go??yikes our stock
Spoke to Linda's assistant today and told her we wanted
to know what rent was running for the other similar townhouses
and also what a purchase price would be- she does not know and said that she gave
Linda my message from last time as well as this time but that she is
not taking any calls....
this is the best I can do...
ily
kq


Sara,
I have reviewed this briefly and have a couple of issues/comments.
I am concerned about the references to cash accounts.  I need to discuss
with the group.  ENA is not authorized to operate cash accounts.
Overdrafts and advances should not be permitted (sections 2Ciii and 4A)
I need to discuss FX with Laurel.  Again, ENA should not be operating cash
accounts.
Any verbal or fax instruction must be confirmed with callback or other
security procedures.  We have some sample call back procedures, test keys
are mentioned but are messy.  Need to discuss.  3C-authority to act should
be predicated on following the agreed procedures.  Maybe this is implied.
In 2, it is mentioned that info can be given.  I think it should be only if
required by law.
5A, generally, we don't allow fees to be debited.
5C I agree with you 5C is ugly.  I think this must be limited to the assets
in the specific accounts related to the agreement.
My number is 713 355 3814
Mary

----- Original Message -----
From: <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com>
To: <mperkins@ix.netcom.com>
Cc: <Sheila.Glover@enron.com>
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 4:46 PM
Subject: Enron North America Corp. ("ENA") Global Custody and Clearance
Agreement

> Mary:
>
> Attached is the latest draft from Chase.
>
> In particular, please take a look at the following paragraphs:
>
> 2.A (the definition of "Securities")
> 5.B (lien on securities)
> 5.C (setoff)
>
> The ENA contact is Gennaro Contella.  Please leave me or Sheila a voice
> mail and we can arrange a conference call on Monday with Gennaro, Nancy
> Callahan, if necessary (Chase legal) and anyone that you need to
conference
> in on behalf of Enron Corp.  The traders are anxious to have this account
> in place.
>
> Irrespective of which Enron entity takes ownership of this agreement, we
> were looking to you for information regarding existing Chase accounts (in
> ENA's name).
>
> Thanks for your help.
>
> Sara Shackleton
> Enron North America Corp.
> 1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
> Houston, Texas  77002
> 713-853-5620 (phone)
> 713-646-3490 (fax)
> sara.shackleton@enron.com
> ----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 06/01/2001 04:38 PM -----
>
>                     Nancy.K.Callahan
>                     @chase.com              To:
Sara.shackleton@enron.com
>                                             cc:
Gennaro.Contella@chase.com
>                     05/31/2001 01:45        Subject:     Enron Global
Custody and Clearance Agreement
>                     PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
> As requested, attached is the final Agreement which I believe reflects the
> revisions we discussed this morning.  If this is acceptable, please have
> the Agreement executed on behalf of Enron and return the necessary
> counterparts to me for signature by Chase.  I will then return fully
> executed copies to you.
> (See attached file: Enron.doc)
> (See attached file: Enron.doc)
>


Please review the attached outage report.

Jerry Graves
713-345-8923


Here is the confirm!!

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Legal
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron
713-853-7658
713-646-3490 Fax


I have changed the price in sitara
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven P South/HOU/ECT on 01/25/2001
02:14 PM ---------------------------

Elizabeth L Hernandez
01/25/2001 02:09 PM
To: Isabel Y Resendez/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Steven P South/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: RE: barrett dec invoice

If Steve agreed to the price he needs to go in and change Sitara.

Steve, please update Sitara.

Isabel Y Resendez
01/25/2001 02:00 PM
To: Elizabeth L Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: barrett dec invoice

Elizabeth,
Have you heard from Steve?  Barrett just send me this note and it says that
Steve has confirm the price for Deal #516560.
Thank you,
isabel
---------------------- Forwarded by Isabel Y Resendez/HOU/ECT on 01/25/2001
01:56 PM ---------------------------

Hilary Searles <hsearles@brr.com> on 01/25/2001 01:46:04 PM
To: "'Isabel.Y.Resendez@enron.com'" <Isabel.Y.Resendez@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: barrett dec invoice

Isabel,
I just sent the support for the volume cuts.  I also spoke with my trader
and she called Steve South at your company.  Steve confirmed that the price
for the 6th - 31st was Malin gas daily.
Let me know if there is anything else you need.
Thanks,
Hilary

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Isabel.Y.Resendez@enron.com [SMTP:Isabel.Y.Resendez@enron.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2001 11:17 AM
> To: hsearles@brr.com
> Cc: Lisa.Valderrama@enron.com
> Subject: RE:barrett dec invoice
>
> Hilary,
> I have not received the pipe support that you said you were going to send.
> Please send the support so that I can get the volumes corrected.
> Also, I have not heard from the trader regarding the NGI malin price.
> Have
> you asked your trader?
> Please, we need to get this down to a reasonable dollar amount.  According
> to our records Barrett still owes Enron 1 mil. dollars.
> I appreciate you sending that pipe support as soon as posible so that I
> can
> get the corrections rolling.
> thanks
> isabel
>


This week's Lite Bytz lunchtime presentation will feature the following APPZ
speaker:

Harry Arora, VP, eCommerce
DealBench
Thursday, November 30, 2000

If you have not already signed up, please RSVP via email to Shawn
Calloway/NA/Enron by the end of the day Tuesday, November 28, 2000.

Click below for more details.

http://home.enron.com:84/messaging/1130liteb.ppt


---------------------- Forwarded by Clay Spears/HOU/ECT on 03/03/2000 04:54
PM ---------------------------

Amelia Alder@ENRON
03/02/2000 11:10 AM
To: Clay Spears/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: ECC Info

Here's what you need to join the club - good seeing you last night, and I'm
so glad you're riding with us this year!


Some of our people get asked on the phone about what is going on in
California.  I have drafted the attached paper for their use.  It is intended
to be simple and user-friendly.  Your thoughts on whether I achieved that
objectvie are welcome.  More importantly, I need you to confimr that I got
the story and facts correct, and that I have not said anything about the
situation that you (Enron USA) would not want to say, or have not said, or if
we have said something fundamentally different, I need to know that, too.
thanks for taking the time to review.  mcs


I've ordered the 1999 Annual Report for Scottish Power, as I noticed it was
not in the company file. It should be here tomorrow or Friday at the latest.
If you need the information sooner than that, I can download the report from
the company's website, although the document is understandably bulky. Please
let me know if you'd like a print-out.

Also, if you'd like, I can talk to Sue about CASA's financial needs. Mollie
and I had discussed splitting the auction proceeds between two charities; in
that way we can share the wealth and not inundate an organization with more
than they can manage. It's something to think about in case CASA doesn't need
much help.

Kate


We need to address both issues unless there is some compelling reason not
to.  Mark

	Andrew Edison@ENRON
	06/06/2001 09:19 AM

		 To: Joseph Deffner/Enron@EnronXGate, W David Duran/Enron@EnronXGate, Charles
Ward/Enron@EnronXGate, Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad
Alford/Enron@EnronXGate, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark E
Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Letter to Timothy D. Bourn.DOC

Attached is a draft arbitration demand our outside counsel has prepared on
the confidentiality issue only.  For what it is worth, outside counsel does
have some concerns with just arbitrating the confidentiality issue. First,
they raise the possibility that by only raising the confidentiality issue, we
might be waiving the guaranty assignability issue. To try to prevent this
argument, you will note that we have put preservation language in the
arbitration statement of claim.  We will need to do some additional legal
research to make sure that would do the trick.  Second, outside counsel tends
to think the two claims together (confidentiality and the guarantee
assignability) work better together.  Let's talk soon.

 - Letter to Timothy D. Bourn.DOC


Looks to me like they aren't ready to close their financing.  Hope I'm wrong.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/25/2001 07:52
AM ---------------------------

"PARKER, Isabel" <isabel.parker@freshfields.com> on 04/25/2001 07:50:00 AM
To: "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: Pegasus - ENA "no objection to forms" letter

This e-mail is confidential and may well also be legally privileged. If you
have received it in error, you are on notice of its status.  Please notify us
immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your system.
Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its contents to
any other person:  to do so could be a breach of confidence.  Thank you for
your co-operation.  Please contact our
IT Helpdesk on +44 (0) 20 7936 4000 Ext.2000 or email ITHelp@freshfields.com
if you need assistance.

The "initial purchaser" is ArcLight Capital Partners Fund I, L.P.
Our instructions were to date the documents as of tomorrow.  I have left a
message with Rick Vicens to confirm this and will revert asap.  In the
meantime, please call me with any questions 212 277 4025.
Thanks
Isabel

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 8:45 AM
To: PARKER, Isabel
Cc: Carolyn Campbell (E-mail); Kay Mann (E-mail); Gregory F. Lang
(E-mail); Rick Vicens (E-mail); John Tisdale (E-mail); Amy Weed
(E-mail); John Anderson (E-mail); BURKE, Ted (TDB)
Subject: Re: Pegasus - ENA "no objection to forms" letter

Isabel,

Who is the "intial purchaser", and why are the documents dated tomorrow?

Thanks again,

Kay

"PARKER, Isabel" <isabel.parker@freshfields.com> on 04/25/2001 07:40:48 AM

To:   "Carolyn Campbell (E-mail)" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com>, "Kay Mann
      (E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>, "Gregory F. Lang (E-mail)"
      <gregorylang@paulhastings.com>, "Rick Vicens (E-mail)"
      <rvicens@deltapower.com>
cc:   "John Tisdale (E-mail)" <jtisdale@arclightcapital.com>, "Amy Weed
      (E-mail)" <aweed@jhancock.com>, "John Anderson (E-mail)"
      <jcsanderson@jhancock.com>, "BURKE, Ted (TDB)"
      <ted.burke@freshfields.com>

Subject:  Pegasus - ENA "no objection to forms" letter

This e-mail is confidential and may well also be legally privileged. If you
have received it in error, you are on notice of its status.  Please notify
us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your
system.  Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its
contents to any other person:  to do so could be a breach of confidence.
Thank you for your co-operation.  Please contact our
IT Helpdesk on +44 (0) 20 7936 4000 Ext.2000 or email
ITHelp@freshfields.com if you need assistance.

Kay

Please find attached a clean and blacklined copy of the Enron "no objection
to forms" letter.
I apologize for not attaching this document to last night's e-mail.

Regards
Isabel

(See attached file: COMPARE001.DOC)
(See attached file: NY003701662.DOC)


Hi Karen,

I'm in agreement with Tana's message below. I understand that the Trader /
Requester
applied to EOL as International Paper Corporation, however, after further
investigation,
DnB supports that the location of this company is actually a Branch location
of International Paper Company, CP/ID 1836 - - already an EOL counterparty.

Please confirm and advise.

Please contact Bernice Rodriguez if an inactivation of this Branch record is
in order.

Bernice, if an inactivation occurs, would you adjust the spreadsheet above on
the O: drive
and resend it to our EOL distribution as an EOL 03-07-01 Amendment.

Thanks !!

Samuel x3-9890
(GCP_Enron Networks)

---------------------- Forwarded by Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT on 03/16/2001 11:10
PM ---------------------------
From: Tana Jones on 03/15/2001 06:23 PM
To: Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: International Paper Corporation

The above counterparty on the 3/7/01 list is ID#93394.  We had a counterparty
on the pre-approval list that was called International Paper Company and was
ID#1836.  Was that one in error?  Are they the same, different?  What's the
scoop?

Thanks for your help!


<<2RZ502!.DOC>>  <<2rz602!.DOC>>  <<2rz802!.DOC>>

Kay:

We have enclosed the most recent drafts of the following "prototype"
documents:

1.  Letter Agreement for the turbine transaction;
2.  Letter Agreement for the transformer transaction
3.  Limited Liability Company Agreement fur the turbine/transformer
transaction.

These documents were last revised on 12/15/2000.  Since that time, we made a
number of changes to the letter agreement in the InterGen transaction that
you might also wish to consider for the prototype.  These items include (i)
provisions for submission and approval of the facility agreement, (ii)
requirement that the entire purchase price be funded into escrow upon
approval of the facility agreement, (iii) pro-ration of property taxes, (iv)
requirement for liability insurance through date of commercial operation,
and (v) tweaks in the termination language that would provide a right to
terminate, rather than automatic termination.  Let me know if we can be of
any assistance.  Thank you.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

Enclosures: 129569v2
  129570v2
  129572v2

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - 2RZ502!.DOC
 - 2rz602!.DOC
 - 2rz802!.DOC


Greg can you se me about this.  MS wants a Master in place before they will transact with us for physical gas.  They have proposed the GISB.  We need to confirm if we even transact physical gas with MS, or if this is an ENA issue, and if we do if we can use our from of Master or alternatively our Canadianized GISB Ts and Cs.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hodge, Jeffrey T.
Sent:	Friday, November 02, 2001 9:20 AM
To:	Keohane, Peter
Subject:	FW: Enron GISB drafts

Peter;

Please call me regarding this.

Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Daniel Garcia <Daniel.Garcia@morganstanley.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 5:04 PM
To:	Hodge, Jeffrey T.
Cc:	Ng, Beth
Subject:	Enron GISB drafts

Dear Jeff:
Thanks for your time earlier today.  Attached, please find the draft GISB and special provisions for each of Enron North America Corp. and Enron Canada Corp.  If you can forward the drafts for the Canadian entity to your counterpart in the Calgary office, I'd greatly appreciate it.
You may coordinate with me to finalize the agreements.  If you have any questions, or if I may be of further assistance, please feel free to contact me at your convenience.
Kind Regards,
Dan
 - Enron North America_GISB.doc << File: Enron North America_GISB.doc >>
 - Enron North America_US spec prov.doc << File: Enron North America_US spec prov.doc >>
 - Enron Canada_GISB.doc << File: Enron Canada_GISB.doc >>
 - Enron Canada_CAD Special Provisions.doc << File: Enron Canada_CAD Special Provisions.doc >>
 - Daniel.Garcia.vcf << File: Daniel.Garcia.vcf >>


thought you would find this of interest

>
> Subject: Thoughts from former Dir of Mil History, USAFA
>
> A friend forwarded this to me. I think it well worth reading.
>
> << From: Dr. Tony Kern, Lt Col, USAF (Ret)
>  Recently, I was asked to look at the recent events through the lens of
> military history. I have joined the cast of thousands who have written an
> "open letter to Americans."
>
>  Dear friends and fellow Americans 14 September, 2001,
>  Like everyone else in this great country, I am reeling from last week's
> attack on our sovereignty. But unlike some, I am not reeling from surprise.
> As a career soldier and a student and teacher of military history, I have a
> different perspective and I think you should hear it. This war will be won or
> lost by the American citizens, not diplomats,politicians or soldiers.
>
>  Let me briefly explain.  In spite of what the media, and even our own
> government is telling us, this act was not committed by a group of mentally
> deranged fanatics. To dismiss them as such would be among the gravest of
> mistakes. This attack was committed by a ferocious, intelligent and dedicated
> adversary. Don't take this the wrong way. I don't admire these men and I
> deplore their tactics, but I respect their  capabilities. The many parallels
> that have been made with the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor are apropos. Not
> only because it was a brilliant sneak attack against a complacent America,
> but also because we may well be pulling our new adversaries out of caves 30
> years after we think this war is over, just like my father's generation had
> to do with the formidable Japanese in the years following WW II.
>
>  These men hate the United States with all of their being, and we must not
> underestimate the power of their moral commitment. Napoleon, perhaps the
> world's greatest combination of soldier and statesman, stated "the moral is
> to the physical as three is to one." Patton thought the Frenchman
> underestimated its importance and said moral conviction was five times more
> important in battle than physical strength. Our enemies are willing - better
> said anxious -- to give their lives for their cause.
>
>  How committed are we America? And for how long? In addition to demonstrating
> great moral conviction, the recent attack demonstrated a mastery of some of
> the basic fundamentals of warfare taught to most military officers worldwide,
> namely simplicity, security and surprise. When I first heard rumors that some
> of these men may have been trained at our own Air War College, it made
> perfect sense to me. This was not a random act of violence, and we can expect
> the same sort of military competence to be displayed in the battle to come.
> This war will escalate, with a good portion of it happening right here in the
> good ol' U.S. of A. These men will not go easily into the night. They do not
> fear us. We must not fear them. In spite of our overwhelming conventional
> strength as the world's only "superpower" (a truly silly term), we are the
> underdog in this fight.
>
>  As you listen to the carefully scripted rhetoric designed to prepare us for
> the march for war, please realize that America is not equipped or seriously
> trained for the battle ahead. To be certain, our soldiers are much better
> than the enemy, and we have some excellent "counter-terrorist" organizations,
> but they are mostly trained for hostage rescues, airfield seizures, or the
> occasional "body snatch," (which may come in handy). We will be fighting a
> war of annihilation, because if their early efforts are any indication, our
> enemy is ready and willing to die to the last man. Eradicating the enemy will
> be costly and time consuming. They have already deployed their forces in as
> many as 20 countries, and are likely living the lives of everyday citizens.
>
>  Simply put, our soldiers will be tasked with a search and destroy mission on
> multiple foreign landscapes, and the public must be patient and supportive
> until the strategy and tactics can be worked out.
>
>  For the most part, our military is still in the process of redefining itself
> and presided over by men and women who grew up with - and were promoted
> because they excelled in - Cold War doctrine, strategy and tactics. This will
> not be linear warfare, there will be no clear "centers of gravity" to strike
> with high technology weapons. Our vast technological edge will  certainly be
> helpful, but it will not be decisive. Perhaps the perfect metaphor for the
> coming battle was introduced by the terrorists themselves aboard the hijacked
> aircraft -- this will be a knife fight, and it will be won or lost by the
> ingenuity and will of citizens and soldiers, not by software or smart bombs.
>
>  We must also be patient with our military leaders. Unlike Americans who are
> eager to put this messy time behind us, our adversaries have time on their
> side, and they will use it. They plan to fight a battle of attrition, hoping
> to drag the battle out until the American public loses its will to fight.
> This might be difficult to believe in this euphoric time of flag waving and
> patriotism, but it is generally acknowledged that America lacks the stomach
> for a long fight. We need only look as far back as Vietnam, when North
> Vietnamese General Vo Nguyen Giap (also a military history teacher) defeated
> the United States of America without ever winning a major tactical battle.
> American soldiers who marched to war cheered on by flag waving Americans in
> 1965 were reviled and spat upon less than three years later when they
> returned. Although we hope
>  that Usama Bin Laden is no Giap, he is certain to understand and employ the
> concept. We can expect not only large doses of pain like the recent attacks,
> but also less audacious "sand in the gears" tactics, ranging from livestock
> infestations to attacks at water  supplies and power distribution facilities.
>
>  These attacks are designed to hit us in our "comfort zone" forcing the
> average American to "pay more and play less" and eventually eroding our
> resolve. But it can only work if we let it. It is clear to me that the will
> of the American citizenry - you and I - is the center of gravity the enemy
> has targeted. It will be the fulcrum upon which victory or defeat will turn.
> He believes us to be soft, impatient, and self-centered. He may be right, but

> if so, we must change. The Prussian general Carl von Clausewitz, (the most
> often quoted and least read military theorist in history), says that there is
> a "remarkable trinity of war" that is composed of the (1) will of the people,
> (2) the political leadership of the government, and (3) the  chance and
> probability that plays out on the field of battle, in that order.
>
>  Every American citizen was in the crosshairs of last Tuesday's attack, not
> just those that were unfortunate enough to be in the World Trade Center or
> Pentagon. The will of the American people will decide this war. If we are to
> win, it will be because we have what it takes to persevere through a few more
> hits, learn from our mistakes, improvise, and adapt. If we can do that, we
> will eventually prevail.  Everyone I've talked to In the past few days has
> shared a common frustration, saying in one form or another "I just wish I
> could do something!" You are already doing it. Just keep faith in America,
> and continue to support your President and military, and the outcome is
> certain.
>
>  If we fail to do so, the outcome is equally certain.
>  God Bless America
>  Dr. Tony Kern, Lt Col, USAF (Ret)
>  Former Director of Military History, USAF Academy
>   >>


Hey everybody!!!

I know the holiday season gets a little crazy, but if you're not attending a
company Christmas party, fighting the masses at the malls, or going to
Cousin Timmy's dysfunctional family get-together, please leave Saturday
night open for hall deckin' H-town style!!

The plans for the entire evening have not been determined, but Zooey & Marty
have graciously offered The Bellefontaine Pub as a starting place for all of
us.  Just think... We can sing & roast marshmallows there for a couple of
hours, and then we'll hit the town with our holiday Nog breath!!   Just
another great excuse to get together & celebrate with friends!   So....

Bring your favorite beverage, and come by for the munchies & fun around
7:00.

Look forward to seeing you all!!

Laura Lou Who


Tana,

That looks fine.  Let's add this language to the lumber confirms.  I spoke to
Tiffany Williams, so she is expecting to make this revision.

Thank you.

Steve Kleege

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Jones, Tana
Sent: Tuesday, May  22, 2001 2:18 PM
To: Kleege, Steven
Subject: Paper Pulp Confirms:  corrections

----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 05/22/2001 02:17 PM -----

	Mary Cook 05/22/2001 01:34 PM 	   To: Tiffany Williams/NA/Enron@Enron, Jay
Epstein/Enron@EnronXGate  cc: Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT  Subject: Paper Pulp Confirms:
corrections

See attached revised language per the request of Jay Epstein that interest
not be inlcuded in the calculation.

 << File: Corrections to Published Prices.doc >>

Cordially,
Mary Cook
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com


You have access to generation daily?  Just wondering if the guy wrote the
story...


We traded on several exchanges including Nymex, CME (Chicago Mercantile Exchange), CBOT (Chicago Board of Trade), ME (Montreal Exchange), IPE (Int'l Petroleum Exch.), and OMLX (The London Securities and Derivatives Exchange).

Thanks,
Todd

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shackleton, Sara
Sent:	Monday, January 28, 2002 9:15 AM
To:	Warwick, Todd
Subject:	RE: Exchange Cash

Thanks.

What exchanges do these entries reflect (e.g., NYMEX only?)?

Sara

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Warwick, Todd
Sent:	Friday, January 25, 2002 1:45 PM
To:	Shackleton, Sara
Cc:	Schield, Elaine
Subject:	Exchange Cash

Here's the file showing which brokers owe us cash as of close of business 1/24/02.  Look at the "0124" tab and under the "Wire Day Cash In/Out" column.  The $95.6MM represents the amount each of these brokers owes to us (We owe HSBC $2,132).  Also, I sent figures to Steve Van Hooser and Mark Taylor on 12/5/01 for the exchange amounts that were due as of 11/30 and 12/4 for $58.4MM and $87.3MM respectively.  Currently all of our exchange positions are closed.

 << File: 0201MarginRequirements.xls >>

Thanks,
Todd


Sorry but I sent the first e mail inadvertently before I had finished all my
comments.  Please disregard the first e mail.

Lynn
---------------------- Forwarded by Lynn Aven/NA/Enron on 12/01/2000 02:39 PM
---------------------------

Lynn Aven
12/01/2000 02:33 PM
To: Michael Guerriero/SA/Enron@Enron
cc: David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron, Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron, Scott
Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor@ECT, Andrea Calo/SA/Enron@Enron, Patrick
Hansen/SA/Enron@Enron, Julian Poole/SA/Enron@Enron, Cristian
Folgar/SA/Enron@Enron, Carlos Alatorre/NA/Enron@Enron, Alberto
Carreno/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re:

Mike:  My comments in RED below address the Tax Issues you have raised.  You
will note that I have commented on several items you list under Legal Issues
as well since these concepts have a tax impact.

Regards

Lynn

To: David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lynn Aven/NA/Enron@Enron, Brent
Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron, Scott Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Taylor@ECT, Andrea Calo/SA/Enron@Enron, Patrick
Hansen/SA/Enron@Enron, Julian Poole/SA/Enron@Enron, Cristian
Folgar/SA/Enron@Enron, Carlos Alatorre/NA/Enron@Enron, Alberto
Carreno/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject:

To expedite communication and secure all functional sign off on the Argentine
offshore power product I am circulating this overview of the product and its
structure and remaining issues that still need to be addressed. Please submit
comments as soon as possible so that we can secure the necessary approvals to
load and launch this product.

Product Description
Product   Argentine Power Financial Swap
Obligation  Firm
Transaction Location Offshore Enron Offshore & Onshore Argentina Counterparty
Internal Counterparty  Enron North America
External Counterparties Generators, LDCs, Largest Industrials,
Term   1 Year and less Intra month, Monthly, Seasonal
Volume   1MW and more
Index   Ezeiza
Currency  $US Dollars/MWh
Stack Manager  Alberto Carreno (ESA Houston)

Legal Issues
We need to secure the following:

Can an ESA employee execute the transaction on behalf of ENA?  NO, THIS WOULD
CREATE PROBLEMS ADDRESSED IN THE THIRD QUESTION IN THE TAX SECTION BELOW.
Sign off on Product Description  I DON'T SEE A TAX PROBLEM HERE IS THE ESA
EMPLOYEES ARE PROVIDING SUPPORT TO ENA.  AT SOME POINT IN TIME, WE WILL NEED
TO PUT IN PLACE A SERVICE AGREEMENT BETWEEN EAS AND ENE WHEREBY EAS CHARGES
ENA FOR THE SERVICES IT PROVIDES ENA IN SUPPORTING ARGENTINE PRODUCTS TRADED
BY ENA.  THIS WILL ADD A LEVEL OF COMFORT IN MAINTAINING THAT ENA IN FACT IS
NOT TRANSACTING BUSINESS IN ARGENTINA.
Finalize GTC  SAME COMMENT AS ABOVE
Confirmation Template
ENA agreement to host product

Tax Issues
In relationship with US taxation risk we need tax to clarify the treatment on
the following:
Whoever will run the Stack Manager for this product has to be physically
located in the US?
THE PERSON WHO RUNS THE STACK MANAGER MUST BE LOCATED IN HOUSTON.  IT WILL BE
PERMISSIBLE FOR THAT PERSON TO RECEIVE INPUT FROM ENRON AMERICA DE SUR
EMPLOYEES IN BUENOS AIRES BUT THE STACK MANAGER MUST BE RUN OUT OF HOUSTON.
Does that person who runs the Stack Manager need to be an ENA employee or can
he be an ESA employee?
THE PERSON WHO RUNS THE STACK MANAGER NEEDS TO BE AN EMPLOYEE OF ENA.
Can an ESA employee execute the transaction on behalf of ENA?  NO.  IF AN ESA
EMPLOYEE EXECUTES THE TRANSACTION,  THE ARGENTINE TAX  AUTHORITIES COULD
SUCCESSFULLY ARGUE THAT ESA IS IN REALITY THE PARTY TO THE TRANSACTION AND
SUBJECT SUCH TRANSACTION TO ARGENTINE INCOME TAX AS WELL AS THE INGRESSOS
BRUTOS AND OTHER TRANSACTIONAL TAXES.
Can Julian sitting in Buenos Aires have read only access to that product on
the Stack Manager?.  THIS SOUNDS OK TO ME.  I ASSUME HE IS JUST MONITORING
THE TRADING ACTIVITY AND WILL ADVISE ENA IF HE SEES ANY POTENTIAL PROBLEMS.

EOL Team
EOL to migrate contents and product to production

Trading Accounting
ENA - Back-Office setup mapping

Once these issues are cleared by Legal,Tax and Trading Accounting  we need to
communicate all this to Dave Forster in order to get the Enrononline group
finalizing implementing the product.

Please give me your comments as soon as possible.

MFG


New CP under 595518 is being set up tomorrow.  Can you please provide me with
a phone number so GCP can confirm their information?  Please copy Bernice
also.


Tnaya,
I did a preliminary numerical experiment to verify that the correlation does
get distorted if the nonnormality is strong. If you want I could document the
distortion for various degrees of non-normality and for different levels of
target correlation between the non-nomal variables.  I could also work on a
correlation mapping scheme if deemed critical for our purpose.
Thanks,

Tanya Tamarchenko@ECT
12/07/2000 01:17 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rabi De/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jaesoo
Lew/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Suggestion: implementing VAR based on non-normal log-returns
simulations

Everybody,
we were talking for a while about using non-normal distributions in the
Monte-Carlo simulations in our VAR model.
I put together some suggestion regarding this. The text is under
O:\_Dropbox\Tanya\non_normal_logs.doc

Look through this 3 page document, and let me know what you think, please.

Tanya


Sally,
   Here is the requested org chart.  Please note for
the Texas region Daren Farmer is leaving and most
likely will be replaced by Chris Germany.  Please call
my cell number 713-823-9701 or page me at 877-497-1838
if you need any additional help.

Bob Superty

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/
 - NETCO%20Logistics%20Org%20chart.ppt


Dad has a subscription to Progressive Farmer, would you like me to have that
sent to you?


Date  Wednesday, Nov. 8
 Time  11:00 AM PST/1:00 PM CST
 Location: Enron Office - 101 California - Suite 1950
   SMALL Conference Room
 Call-in No.: 888-422-7109
 Host Code: 210961
 Participant's:  133401


Which IRA is right for you?

Whether you are saving for a new home, college, or retirement,
Enron Federal Credit Union offers
Traditional, Roth, and Education IRAs to fit your needs.

12 Month Term IRA Certificate	2.75% APY
24 Month Term IRA Certificate	3.25% APY
36 Month Term IRA Certificate	3.75% APY
IRA Savings				1.75% APY

An IRA Savings Account can be opened with only $25,
or open a Term IRA Certificate with $500.

To set up an IRA or for more information,
please visit www.enronfcu.com
or call 713.853.6902.

<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>


What is the dial-in info for today's call?


We need all historical data preserved in all markets (price, vol, trades by counterparty, volume by counterparty, broker vs. EOL, broker prices, EOL prices, etc.)

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nat, Steve
Sent:	Wednesday, January 30, 2002 10:40 AM
To:	Will, Lloyd
Cc:	Presto, Kevin M.; Belden, Tim
Subject:	FW: UBS Business Data

Lloyd,  This is the level of detail I expect to provide legal in regard to the type and amount of Power business data that will or will not be copied to UBS.  Let me know if you have any questions or concerns...

Steve

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nat, Steve
Sent:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 11:36 AM
To:	Johnson, Jeff; Stock, Steve; Henry, Jane Hilburn
Cc:	Poston, David
Subject:	UBS Business Data

All:  This is the type/level of information I believe we should provide back to legal about our plans for copying business data from Enron to UBS.  Glad to discuss...

Deal Data (Contract Briefs and Physical Flow):

Not Copied to UBS.

Global Data:

Counterparties and Contracts for UBS Established by User Representatives in the Global System.  Power Systems Use a Snapshot Copy of this data in UBS.  Facilities Data Copied in Total.

Fundamentals Data:

All Data (Load History, Weather History, Satellite Weather Maps, Plant Output History, Load Forecasts, etc...) Scraped from Public Sites for use in Power Analytics Copied to UBS.

ISO/Pool Data:

All Data (Settlements and Market Clearing Prices) Available from Market Control Entities Copied to UBS.

Curve Data:

All Price, Volatility, and Correlation Curves Maintained by Power Trading Copied to UBS.  Amount of History TBD by Trading Function.

Broker Data:

Not Copied to UBS.


Just learned about this.  Any interest in GA covering this?
---------------------- Forwarded by Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES on 08/29/2000
01:06 PM ---------------------------

"Robert Weisenmiller" <rbw@mrwassoc.com> on 08/29/2000 11:20:44 AM
To: Mona Petrochko <mpetroch@enron.com>, Aaron Thomas
<athomas@newenergy.com>, Rick Counihan <rick.counihan@greenmountain.com>
cc:
Subject: Fwd: Workshop of note

FYI.

Bob

>Delivered-To: mrwassoc@atlas.dnai.com
>X-Sender: acomnes@pop.prodigy.net
>X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.1
>Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 11:09:38 -0700
>To: scm@MRWassoc.com, rbw@MRWassoc.com
>From: "G. Alan Comnes" <GAC@MRWassoc.com>
>Subject: Workshop of note
>X-Envelope-To: <rbw@MRWassoc.com>
>X-MDRemoteIP: 207.181.194.110
>X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: rbw@mrwassoc.com
>
>This kind of stuff usually does not show up on the daily calendar ....
>
>
>Workshop Notice
>August 29, 2000
>10 am
>
>and
>
>August 30, 2000
>9 am - 12 noon
>         Pacific Gas and Electric Company
>77 Beale Street, Auditorium
>San Francisco
>
>The CPUC and the California ISO are sponsoring a workshop on the Electric
>Settlements Process in California's Direct Access market.  The purpose of
>the workshop is to provide all market participants with an overview of the
>Settlement Process and to share information about controls and practices
>used by various participants during the settlement process.
>Please RSVP by August 18th by calling or emailing Jeanette Plumley at the
>California ISO with the name of your organization and the number of people
>attending each day.  Ms. Plumley can be reached at (916) 608-5971 or by
>email at jplumley@caiso.com.
>


Teco Tap       35.000 / Enron ; 71.250 / HPL Gas Daily

LS HPL LSK IC       15.000 / Enron


Rick & Ted,

One more thing to watch. California power prices next  summer.
We see the possibility of higher prices and of spikes (bad hydro conditions
in California, growing demand for power).

Vince


There will not be an EGM Organizational Post Petition meeting today -- it has been cancelled because Gary is traveling.  Instead the meeting will be held on Friday, January 25 at 9:00 am CST in conference room ECN 30C1.  Please plan to attend or use the dial-in number shown below:

	Domestic Callers
	Dial 1-877-987-1409  Operator will assist with the call
	Leaders Name:  Gary Hickerson
	Pass Code:  Gary

	International Participants
	Dial 001-610-769-3343	Operator will assist with the call
	Leaders Name:  Gary Hickerson
	Pass Code:  Gary

LONDON EMPLOYEES ONLY:  Please meet in conference room SE1002 (tele# 011-44-207-783-0113) and dial into the meeting using the number above.  If you have any questions, please call Kathy Tibbs in London on ext. 5479.

Thank you.

Judy Zoch
Enron Global Markets LLC
Financial Trading
1400 Smith
Houston, TX  77002
(713) 853-0655
email:  judy.zoch@enron.com


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 02/28/2001 07:54
AM ---------------------------

Ernie@ECT
02/28/2001 07:05 AM
Sent by: Ernie@ECT
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Development Center Class Reminder  - Harassment Avoidance

You are scheduled to attend:

Harassment Avoidance
Class Days and Times:
  3/5/2001  04:30:00 PM - 06:00:00 PM
Room # & Location: DoubleTree-La Salle B,  Houston
Participant Fee: $ 50
Note:

If you are unable to attend this class, the registration must be canceled by
5:00 p.m. on  March 5, 2001 to prevent a charge of $ 50 to your RC number.

 We look forward to seeing you at 04:30:00 PM on March 5, 2001.  Please call
the Development Center Team at 713-853-0357 if you have any questions.

 Thank you.


Mr. Kaminski,

It was a pleasure and honor to have lunch with you. I also enjoyed your
presentation in our graduate class.  I hope you enjoyed your visit to
Baton Rouge. Come back to visit us sometime!!

Attached is my resume as you suggested.  Thank you for your interest in
LSU and me.

Sincerely,
Datren L. Williams

 - RESUME.doc


[IMAGE]

Save your money! Get two ink cartridges for the price of one!
[IMAGE]
click here

[IMAGE]

This foot-and-mouth virus that is sweeping throughout Europe is enough to
make even the greatest carnivore turn into a strict vegetarian. I seriously
doubt that it would actually come to that, but if it did, I could probably
swing it... maybe. However, I can't vouch for Sunny and Edgar. Recently,
JokeMistress and me ordered take out from this cool vegetarian place by us.
We had some Soy Bean Burger left over, so I placed it down for them eat. I
wasn't very surprised when they didn't maul it, but what I didn't expect was
how insulted they were by my well-intended gesture. They looked at me as if
to say, "Are you kidding us?" I told them I was and promised never to do it
again.

RESPOND: Feedback@humornetwork.com

?

[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]

		[IMAGE]

DRINKING BUDDIES

A couple of drinking buddies who are airplane mechanics are in a hangar at
JFK New York. It's fogged in and they have nothing to do.

One of them says to the other, "Man, have you got anything to drink?"

The other one says, "Nah, but I hear you can drink jet fuel, and it will
kinda give you a buzz."
So they do drink it, get smashed and have a great time, like only drinking
buddies can.

The following morning, one of the men wakes up and he just knows his head
will explode if he gets up, but it doesn't. He gets up and feels good. In
fact, he feels great! No hangover!

The phone rings. It's his buddy. The buddy says, "Hey, how do you feel?"

"Great", he said! "Just great"! The buddy says, "Yeah, I feel great too, and
no hangover. That jet fuel stuff is great. We should do this more often!

"Yeah, we could, but there's just one thing . . . "

"What's that?"

"Did you fart yet?"

"No . . . "

"Well, DON'T, 'cause I'm in Phoenix."

? 	?

		 [IMAGE]
		Save your money!
		Get two ink cartridges
		for the price of one!
		Click Here

		[IMAGE]

		The Humor Store

		FIND ALL YOUR GAG GIFTS HERE!

		Featured Selection:
		GOLF TRICKS
		Includes 50 different ways to lie, cheat and steal your way to victory!
		CLICK HERE

?	?
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
 [IMAGE]
Save your money!
Get two ink cartridges
for the price of one!
Click Here
	[IMAGE]

?	?

[IMAGE]
You received this e-mail because when you signed up you  agreed to receive
Joke-Of-The-Day from The Humor Network.?If you don't want to get these
letters anymore please  click here or send a blank email

logo


Cara is working on updating the report to accommodate the volumes impacted. Cara will add the "From" and "To" volumes as well as the difference.

John Buchanan

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Blair, Lynn
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 6:46 PM
To:	Buchanan, John; Kowalke, Terry
Cc:	Nacey, Sheila
Subject:	NNG/TW Manual Scheduling Report

	How difficult would it be to add the volume to the summary report we do today?

	Sheila and I met with Shelley and reviewed our process.  She felt very good about the process
	but would like to see the volumes impacted by the adjustments not just dollars.

	We can discuss when I get back next week.

	Thanks. Lynn


Please find attached our Weekly Report (10th August 2000) for your perusal
and information.

Regards,

Beverley


I have not received a call back from Jeff Bartlett, but based on the brochure
I received from Louise, here is what I understand:

DealBench is a way to streamline processes to efficiently execute
transactions and distribute deal-related information.  There are 5 platform
tools - document sharing, multi-media, auctioning, secure communication, and
deal management.   There are five primary products offered which utilize the
tools provided...  Bank Products, Structured Products, Commercial Paper,
Procurement, and Legal Space.

1) Bank Products - deal management for issuance of debt offerings (credit
revolvers/secured term-notes)
2) Structured Products - deal management for initial issuance or re-sale of
bonds, leveraged leases and other financial transactions
3)  Commercial Paper - deal mgmt for issuance of CP
4)  Procurement - management of wholesale purchasing and selling of various
products
5)  Legal Space - designed to meet the needs of attorneys at law firms (doc
sharing, aggregation and organization in a secure environment)

I have a lot of questions for Jeff, so I will send you a quick note when I
speak to him.

Sheri


I didn't redact it, but Ben might have a copy.  I can email you the
electronic file of the intact document.

From: Sheila Tweed@ECT on 03/16/2001 01:54 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: E-Next Generation Docs

Thanks!  I really could use a copy of the Blue Dog contract, especially if
you redacted it to give out to bidders.  Thanks!

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	03/16/2001 11:53 AM

		 To: Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: E-Next Generation Docs

I'll have to send the notice separately.

John's number is 713 751-3254.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/16/2001 11:53
AM ---------------------------
From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 01/17/2001 02:47 PM
To: kwiemer@milbank.com, Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron, Kay
Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: E-Next Generation Docs

Attached are the documents that you asked me to change the signature line:


This FRIDAY, DECEMBER 8, 2000 (5:00 p.m. CST) is the deadline for deferral
program enrollment.  Following the deadline, no new elections or changes to
existing elections will be accepted.
To learn more about your deferral program opportunities and to enroll for
2001 deferrals, access eHRonline at http://ehronline.enron.com.  (Call the
ISC Help Desk at 713-345-4727 if you need your ID or password to access the
system.)

1. Review the program descriptions (attached to the Election Form) before you
make your elections.
2. If you decide to defer compensation, complete the Election Form before
Friday, December 8,  2000, 5:00 p.m. CST (the enrollment deadline).
3. Print your 2001 Election Form and Confirmation Statement right from the
web site and you,re   finished!

DEFERRAL ENROLLMENT 2001--ADDED VALUE FOR YOUR FUTURE


Attached, please find an updated allocations schedule which now reflects in a separate line the planned IT Infrastructure Allocation related to each support department that will be passed on to each Business Unit from ENA for 2002.

Also attached is related support:

Thanks,
Edie


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/04/2001 11:52 AM -----

	"Ronald Carroll" <rcarroll@bracepatt.com>
	04/04/2001 11:41 AM

		 To: <mmilner@coral-energy.com>, <rreilley@coral-energy.com>,
<ray.alvarez@ei.enron.com>, <acomnes@enron.com>, <dfulton@enron.com>,
<jdasovic@enron.com>, <jhartso@enron.com>, <smara@enron.com>,
<snovose@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Fwd: Edison gets more time; Calif. may sell $14 bln bonds

----- Message from "Tracey Bradley" <tbradley@bracepatt.com> on Wed, 04 Apr
2001 08:34:07 -0500 -----
To:	"Justin Long" <jlong@bracepatt.com>, "Paul Fox" <pfox@bracepatt.com>
cc:	"Jeffrey Watkiss" <dwatkiss@bracepatt.com>, "Ronald Carroll"
<rcarroll@bracepatt.com>
Subject:	Edison gets more time; Calif. may sell $14 bln bonds
Tuesday April 3, 6:15 pm Eastern Time
Edison gets more time; Calif. may sell $14 bln bonds
(UPDATE: Recasts, adds details throughout, byline)

By Jonathan Stempel

NEW YORK, April 3 (Reuters) - Edison International (NYSE:EIX - news), parent
of troubled utility Southern California Edison, said on Tuesday bankers are
giving it and the utility more time to cure their defaults on three credit
lines.

The announcement came after the California Public Utilities Commission (PUC),
which sets rates, also on Tuesday voted to authorize the state's Department
of Water Resources to sell between $12 billion and $14 billion of bonds to
finance power purchases, and examine the financial links between the
utilities and their parents.

The 30-day extension from Edison's banks means the banks will ``forbear,'' or
not act upon, the credit line defaults.

``That will take us out to basically around April 14,'' said Ted Craver,
chief financial officer of Edison International, during an investor
conference call. The prior forbearance, the banks' second, had expired March
13.

The California power crisis has led to periodic blackouts and left SoCal
Edison, which owes more than $5.4 billion for post power costs, and the
state's largest utility Pacific Gas & Electric Co., which owes about $8.9
billion, on the brink of bankruptcy. A rate freeze imposed under the state's
1996 utility deregulation law has prevented them from passing on their
soaring wholesale power costs to consumers.

Though the PUC awarded the utilities a roughly 40 percent rate hike last
week, allowing them to collect $4.8 billion more each year, analysts and the
utilities said the hike effectively does nothing to let the utilities to
recoup their prior costs.

``At best the utility is standing still (in that) it hasn't improved its cash
flow or its cash position,'' said Craver. ``At worst, it is going backwards.
That's our basic conclusion on the numbers and the mechanisms as we
understand them.''

San Francisco-based PG&E Corp. (NYSE:PCG - news), parent of Pacific G&E, has
said it expects to take a $4.1 billion charge for unrecouped electricity
costs, while Rosemead, Calif.-based Edison has said it may take a
``substantial'' charge that may total as much as $2.7 billion.

The California Independent System Operator, which runs most of the state's
power grid, early on Tuesday called another Stage Two emergency alert because
of supply problems. Such alerts are declared when power reserves fall to
within 5 percent of peak demand. The alert was later lifted.

Edison shares closed Tuesday on the New York Stock Exchange at $12.82, up 27
cents, or 2.2 percent. PG&E shares closed on the Big Board at $11.53, down 22
cents, or 1.9 percent.

Craver also said in the conference call that SoCal Edison has rolled over
364-day and 5-year Libor-based credit facilities that recently matured for a
respective 30 and 90 days, and that Edison rolled over one of its own
facilities for 45 days.

He concluded the call by expressing relief that creditors have not yet thrown
the utility into bankruptcy, which analysts have said could already have
happened by now had the PUC not granted the rate hike.

``I'm somewhat amazed about how disciplined everybody has been,'' he said.
``We're seeking protection from misguided regulatory decisions, and the
solution is really in that same venue, in the regulatory and political and
legislative context.''


I have completed an evaluation of a "backwardation" hedge strategy requested
by Wendy King.  The stratregy is intended to hedge oil inventories and is
based of trading Nymex futures and options.

Wendy has suggested she wants to review this with Jeff Shankman.  I would
like to review my conclusions with you before I send it to Wendy and will ask
Shirley to set up a meeting.

A writeup is attached.

Bob


Tim, sorry for the delay - lets talk if you think it is warranted.  I can see
a lot of positives to take this path. However,  there are a) pr issues and b)
we have hoards of on-going litigation that cost us a bundle.  We should make
this decision very carefully.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 11/22/2000
03:06 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Tim Belden                           11/13/2000 07:22 PM

To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: Plan Questions

The total depreciation plan number for west trading is $278,000.  Here is the
general breakdown

    Net Book Value  Planned Amount  Depreciation Period
Floor Buildouts   $462,000  $135,000   3 to 5 years
PC's and Monitors  $214,000  $50,000    3 years
Large Plasma Screens  $77,000   $46,000    3 years
Other    $25,000   $7,000    3 years
2001 Increase      $40,000

Total    $778,000  $278,000

Here is the headcount breakdown:

   Current   2001 Plan  Change  Realistically
Trading   41   48   +7  +5   (2 RT, 2 analysts on desk, 1 admin.)
Mid Mkt & Svcs  9   12   +3  +1 or +2  (increase coverage)
Fundamentals  7   9   +2  +1   (supply person with hydro knowledge)
Structuring  0   0   0  +2   (group is 4 -- Chris planned half, I need to
plan for half)

Totals   57   69   +12  +9 or +10

It looks like my number is two or three too high.  We also had a mixup on
planning for the existing structuring group.  Let me know if you have any
questions.

Also,  I need to talk to you about the City of Vernon.  I want to sue them.
Several months ago they flaked on a purchase that has cost us about
$10,000,0000.  Richard Sanders has done the basic legwork and it looks like
we have a decent case.  I talked to Chris about it, and we both agree that it
doesn't hurt the west business if we poke them in the eye.  They are not well
liked in the muni community out here, so the collateral damage should be
minimal.  The big question is how will this appear in the face of all of the
ongoing investigations?  Perhaps we should set up a call with me, you, Lavo,
Sanders, Calger, and Kean?  Let me know your thoughts.

Tim
503-464-3820


Please take me off your list.  I don't wish to receive any more email from you.

-----Original Message-----
From: Lee Lewis [mailto:wercvurofrew@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wed 1/2/2002 8:11 PM
To: Undisclosed.Recipients@mailman.enron.com
Cc:
Subject: Compare life insurance rates.. . . . ..

The Lowest

Life Insurance Quotes

Without the Hassle!

Compare rates from the nation's top Life Insurance companies

COMPARE YOUR CURRENT COVERAGE <http://www.i-european.org/insurance.html>
to these sample 10-year level term monthly premiums
(20 year, 30 year and smoker rates also available)

	$250,000	 $500,000	 $1,000,000
Age	 Male	 Female	 Male	 Female	 Male	 Female
30	 $12	 $11	 $19	 $15	 $31	 $27
40	 $15	 $13	 $26	 $21	 $38	 $37
50	 $32	 $24	 $59	 $43	 $107	 $78
60	 $75	 $46	 $134	 $87	 $259	 $161

Click Here to Compare! <http://www.i-european.org/insurance.html>
It's fast, easy and FREE!

  _____

*All quotes shown are from insurance companies rated A-, A, A+ or A++ by A.M. Best Company (a registered rating service) and include all fees and commissions.
Actual premiums and coverage availability will vary depending upon age, sex, state availability, health history and recent tobacco usage.

(c) 2001. All rights reserved (ST) This email has been screened and filtered by the a third party removal system. Client I.D. # 602142
If you wish to remove your email address from this mailing please send a email to
"removeme@i-european.org" with the word "remove" in the subject line