Do any of you have any problems with keeping these trades as they are now that we've figured out what they are.  If not we'll just keep them as they were...
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mulvany, Patrick
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 2:47 PM
To:	Jones, Tana
Cc:	Anderson, Diane; Bradford, William S.; Brackett, Debbie R.
Subject:	RE: Riskmantra vs. EGM

Tana,

These deals are purely for storage.  They used tagg to capture the value of storing the physical gas.  Pat Ryder in Risk Management put these deals in and has told me they are used for value and should be "Not to be Confirmed."  If you see no issue, I will simply change their status to "Not to be Confirmed."  If their status of being under EGM is still a problem, Pat said you could call him at 5-3313.

Thanks,

Patrick

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jones, Tana
Sent:	Friday, October 19, 2001 6:34 PM
To:	Bradford, William S.; Mulvany, Patrick; Brackett, Debbie R.
Cc:	Anderson, Diane; Moran, Tom
Subject:	RE: Riskmantra vs. EGM

Patrick,

Can we track down who/how these trades are getting entered into the system?  Is there someone entering the trades into the system?  Is this just an old counterparty/book set up in GCP that needs to get renamed.  Legal (me) has no idea why trades are being done out of EGM.  Can we find out who is doing them?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bradford, William S.
Sent:	Friday, October 19, 2001 3:58 PM
To:	Mulvany, Patrick; Jones, Tana; Brackett, Debbie R.
Cc:	Anderson, Diane; Moran, Tom
Subject:	RE: Riskmantra vs. EGM

I think this refers to gas daily trades between Risk Management and Trade (which is an Enron entity set up for state tax reasons) and EGM (which may be a company code for Enron North America Corp. formerly known as Enron Gas Marketing, Inc.).  If this is the case, we should document them under the Master between ENA and RMT.  However, this is up to Legal.

Bill

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mulvany, Patrick
Sent:	Friday, October 19, 2001 3:48 PM
To:	Jones, Tana; Brackett, Debbie R.; Bradford, William S.
Cc:	Anderson, Diane
Subject:	FW: Riskmantra vs. EGM

Here is a list of all the trades with EGM.

Thanks,

Patrick
Financial Confirmations
53877

 << File: export.csv >>

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jones, Tana
Sent:	Friday, October 19, 2001 12:36 PM
To:	Mulvany, Patrick; Anderson, Diane
Subject:	FW: Riskmantra vs. EGM

I also got an email back from Bill Bradford, head of Credit that siad this doesn't make sense.  Maybe you need to prepare a print out of the trades and send to debbie, me & bill.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Brackett, Debbie R.
Sent:	Friday, October 19, 2001 9:28 AM
To:	Jones, Tana
Subject:	RE: Riskmantra vs. EGM

	No idea. EGM doesn't exist.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jones, Tana
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 6:42 PM
To:	Brackett, Debbie R.; Bradford, William S.; Campbell, Lesli; Conwell, Wendy; Espinoza, Veronica; Johnson, Rudwell; Lebrocq, Wendi; Mendoza, Nidia; Moran, Tom; Ngo, Tracy; Radous, Paul; Rohauer, Tanya; Sacks, Edward; Vanek, Darren; Williams, Jason R (Credit)
Cc:	Mulvany, Patrick
Subject:	FW: Riskmantra vs. EGM

Does anyone in Credit know the answer to this question, as I don't?
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mulvany, Patrick
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 5:52 PM
To:	Jones, Tana
Cc:	Anderson, Diane
Subject:	FW: Riskmantra vs. EGM

Tana,

I was just following about these trades.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mulvany, Patrick
Sent:	Wednesday, October 10, 2001 5:36 PM
To:	Jones, Tana
Cc:	Anderson, Diane
Subject:	Riskmantra vs. EGM

Tana,

There are about 20-30 deals in pending sent to legal status that are Riskmantra vs. EGM.  My question is should we even be doing trades with Enron Gas Marketing.  And if we should, can we set up an ISDA with RMT with an effective date of 9/5/01?

Thanks,

Patrick


Hey guys,

I just wanted to give you a friendly reminder to please have someone go through all your books to look for any deals with ECC and a third counterparty for October and November 2001 production.  I'll try to find as many as I can, but I'm not as familiar with all of your books as you are, and I don't want any deals to be missed.  If you come across any deals can you please flip them to the FT-US/CAND-ERMS book as soon as possible as there are only a couple more days left this month, and settlements needs to get started on invoicing.

Please let me know if you have any questions on this.

Thanks
Stacey


Following please find the Daily EnronOnline Executive Summary.

Special Announcement! This report can now be accessed directly through the
EnronOnline Intranet Site at http://eolinfo.enron.com.

In order to access this report,  click on the link above. Once there, follow
the link entitled "Reports" and then select the "Secured Reports" tab. A
dropdown menu will appear with a list of the various secured reports
available for viewing. After choosing the report you are interested in, a
security window will appear requiring you to enter your Windows login ID and
password. Simply enter your standard login and the report will load
automatically.

We look forward to your feedback and comments. If you have any questions or
experience any difficulties accessing your reports through the Intranet Site,
please feel free to contact either Bryan Deluca at x36161 or Simone La Rose
at x31670.


Tom:
I talked with Mary this a.m. and I don't understand why she is making this out to be so difficult but she didn't understand what we need re: Panaco.  I told her that Milton Bolanos ( Volume Mgmt) has the downloaded pipeline statements which show the daily cashout over the past year for each block on Hios and Larry Aguirre Has ANR.  All she has to do is apply the cashout price for each month and spit out the totals and add them together to see the net effect over the year and do the same for yr. 2001.   I asked her to get back to me with an ETA.   The Devon 2000 $$  are still not put into your book, this is the email that she forwarded to me.  I asked her to update you directly.  This is the message from her.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ellenberger, Mary
Sent:	Tuesday, June  5, 2001 7:34 AM
To:	Schrab, Mark L.
Subject:	RE:
Importance:	High

I have a meeting with Philip Love and Kam Kaiser Wed. 6/6/01 at 9:am
	1. How do they want to book in Sitara.
	2. Calculations of Panaco (Jan-March 01) complete. Using your "Hios Imbalance" graph Jan-Mar 01 had the biggest 	swing. I need to meet with the principles to discuss.
	4. It will be the end of the week before Devon 2001 penalties are complete. I'll be doing system testing this afternoon.
Mary Ellenberger 5-8773
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Schrab, Mark L.
Sent:	Monday, June 04, 2001 5:10 PM
To:	Ellenberger, Mary
Cc:	Donohoe, Tom
Subject:

Mary:

I hate to be a pest but, Tom really needs to get some answers re:

1.  Status of the Devon $$ for year 2000 that I think you were working with Philip Love in Risk Mgmt.  Did it get moved into ENA Central Gulf?
2.  The net effect of cashout $$ that Panaco has incurred for year 2000.
3.  The net effect of cashout $$ that Panaco has incurred for year 2001.
4.  The Devon penalties and cashout for 2001.

Mark


To everyone in Calgary and Toronto:

On Tuesday, I sent an e-mail to all of you reminding you of our media policy.

In the interim, you may have seen press reports involving the Competition
Bureau's investigations at the offices of Enron Canada and Powerex last
spring.  For those of you located in Calgary, you will recall that last
spring representatives of the Competition Bureau executed a search warrant on
our offices, and those press reports relate to those investigations.

The purpose of this memo is to remind you of the following:

1. This matter is not to be discussed with the media, except in accordance
with the media policy as outlined in my memo yesterday.

2. Although you may receive inquiries from friends, families, commercial
counterparts or others with respect to this matter, it is your duty not to
speculate on this matter or provide your thoughts or interpretations on any
of the press reports.  This does not mean that Enron Canada is intending to
obstruct the process in any way.  To the contrary, although Enron Canada
believes that the allegations are without substance and that the matter will
resolve itself in due course, Enron Canada is cooperating to the greatest
extent possible with the Competition Bureau.  It is, however, important that
the matter is not elevated or aggravated as a result of inaccuracies,
speculation or conjecture.  To that extent, if inquiries are made of you that
have legitimate business concern, such as concerns from a commercial
counterparty, you should indicate that you will make the appropriate
inquiries, and those matters should then be specifically referred to either
Rob Milnthorp, Rob Hemstock, Aleck Dadson or me.

3. It is important to bear in mind that the Competition Bureau's formal
complaint, as may be reported by the media and as is the nature of such
things, was lodged prior to, and in order to initiate, their investigation.
Therefore, by its nature, allegations have been presented by the Competition
Bureau in a way designed to indicate that there is substance to the
allegations, but which have not been substantiated and which we are confident
will be resolved to our satisfaction.

Peter


Leslie,

My changes/comments are as shown

Justin

Leslie Hansen
04/08/2000 19:41
To: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Legal & Privacy Statement for EOL

Justin:

We have not yet put the new EOL version on-line.  It will be rolled out in
the next week or so as far as I know.  Do you have any other requested
changes or additions?

Leslie

	Justin Boyd
	08/04/2000 01:32 PM

		 To: Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Legal & Privacy Statement for EOL

Leslie - if this is possible, I would prefer for the EnronOnline L&P
statement to contain the new text I had suggested for ClickPaper.com.

However, where do we stand in terms of making the changes to the EnronOnline
L&P statement - has this been done yet or are we just about to put the new
EOL version online?

Thanks.
Justin

Leslie Hansen
04/08/2000 17:06
To: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Legal & Privacy Statement for EOL

Justin:

Travis recently forwarded to me the language you proposed adding to Section 4
of the ClickPaper Terms and Conditions for Use:

"For European Union residents: please note that Enron Europe Finance &
Trading Limited is authorized to carry on investment business in the United
Kingdom by the UK Securities and Futures Authority (SFA) and had reviewed and
approved the contents of this website for relevant regulatory purposes. The
services referred to in this website are intended only for commercial
enterprises and not for private customers as defined by the rules of SFA.
Enron will not enter into transactions with persons who would be regarded as
private customers under the rules of SFA.  For Belgian residents: please note
that, pursuant to the Belgian law of 14 July 1991 on Commercial Practices,
this website is to be considered as being advertising (reclame/publicit,)."

Section 4 of the EnronOnline Legal and Privacy statement contains a similar
provision stated in a somewhat different manner.  Whereas the above language
specifically provides, "The services referred to in this website are intended
only for commercial enterprises and not for private customers as defined by
the rules of SFA. Enron will not enter into transactions with persons who
would be regarded as private customers under the rules of SFA."  Section 4 of
the EOL Legal and Privacy states only that "The website is intended only for
commercial enterprises in certain specified jurisdictions."

Do you want me to revise Section 4 of the EOL Legal and Privacy statement to
conform to the ClickPaper language or are you comfortable with the EOL
language as currently drafted.

I have attached a final version of the EOL Legal and Privacy statement for
your review and reference.

Regards,

Leslie


FYI - Despite the fact that this an OU student, I thought that you would find
this note interesting.  Since we compete with Big 5 for talent at several
schools, we should be aware of the make up of some of their job offers that
lure students to join them.    Paying for a masters degree at UVA ahead of
time is certainly an interesting piece of this job offer.  See note from Lexi
below.
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 12/15/2000 01:28 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Lexi Elliott @ ENRON                           12/15/2000 10:38 AM

To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, James
Scribner/Corp/Enron@Enron, Tamara Hopkins/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Patrick
Wade/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark McConnell/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Eric Moon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen Plauche/Corp/Enron@Enron, Angie
Zeman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Justin O'Malley/HOU/EES@EES, Jody
Crook/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Patrick Maloy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rafael Avila/HOU/EES@EES,
Nate Blackburn/NA/Enron@Enron, Tana Cashion/NA/Enron@ENRON, Greg
Nikkel/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Jacqueline Coleman/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Jonathan Beck

Dear OU Team:

I just received notice from Jon Beck that he is declining our offer.  He has
accepted with E&Y in Dallas.  They have offered to pay for his Master's of
Accounting at the University of Virginia BEFORE he begins working for them.
This is truly a wonderful opportunity for him, but I know how disappointed
many of us are to see that he will not be joining the Enron team.

lexi
3-4585


This message has been automatically generated in response to your
mckinseyquarterly.com registration.

You requested notification about new articles in the categories
listed below. To confirm your enrollment, please reply to this
message and remove any/all characters that may preceed the
word Subscribe.

Subscribe ECONOMIC-PERFORMANCE
Subscribe RETAIL
Subscribe ENVIRONMENT
Subscribe COUNTRIES
Subscribe STRATEGY
Subscribe INTERVIEWS
Subscribe FINANCIAL-INSTITUTIONS
Subscribe ENERGY
Subscribe TELECOMMUNICATIONS
Subscribe CORPORATE-FINANCE
Subscribe ELECTRONIC-COMMERCE


Here is the executed masters list.  We will try to get you guys on the distribution list, but if we can't we'll just forward the e-mail to you.  Is there anyone else in your group we should add to the list?

Marie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Enron Announcements/Corp/Enron@ENRON   On Behalf Of Financial Trading Group@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 12:01 AM
To:	Executed Master Agreements mailing@ENRON
Subject:	Executed Master Agreements (October version)


Brent Price and I will be in the London office next week.  Wanted to see if
you, Frank and Mo might be available for dinner one evening.  We arrive on
Monday morning (March 20th) and will return to Houston on Friday morning.
Our Tuesday night is booked, having dinner with Fernley.  But Monday,
Wednesday and Thursday are available.  Does it work for you with the baby to
do evenings?  Let me know.


Do you do expense reports and have not taken the training?

Expense Management System (XMS) - Cost: $135
         June 4th		8:30am-11:30am	EB564
June 19th	1:00pm-4:00pm		  EB564

The Expense Management System (XMS) is a tool used to electronically submit your expense report for approval and payment through the Enron Intranet. It is user friendly, accurate and less labor intensive for you and the accounting staff.  This system will help you report your travel and entertainment expenses.

You will learn how to:
E	Create New Expense Reports
E	Enter Cash Expense Receipts
E	Adding Company Card Entries
E	Enter Personal Car Mileage
E	Foreign Currency Translation
E	Reimbursement Method
E	Designating your Approving Manager
E	Designating your Administrative Assistant
E	Submitting Your Expense Report
E	Reviewing your Expense Report
E	And Much More...

Please login and enroll through the InvestInMe website, http://www.corptraining.com/index.cfm?company=enron.  If you have any questions, please call 713 853-1816.


Paul,

FYI.  This is the document which starts the move into the ABB facility
agreements.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/23/2000 04:22
PM ---------------------------

"ROB TAYLOR" <TAYLR@andrews-kurth.com> on 10/23/2000 04:12:48 PM
To: <szisman@ect.enron.com>, <eric.boyt@enron.com>, <k.clark3@enron.com>,
<Kay.Mann@enron.com>, <Roseann.Engeldorf@enron.com>, <TOxley@winston.com>
cc:

Subject: Attached Files

Attached are clean and marked versions of the Purchase Option Assignment and
Assumption Agreement.  Please insert the date of the ABB Agreement (p. 1) as
well as descriptive information of the equipment being purchased (Schedule 1).

Please let me know if you have any questions or comments regarding the
attached.

Regards,

Rob Taylor
Andrews & Kurth L.L.P.
Chase Tower
600 Travis Street
Suite 4200
Houston, Texas  77002

Tel:  (713) 220-4436
Fax:  (713) 238-7273

robtaylor@andrews-kurth.com

This e-mail (and any attachment(s) hereto) is intended only for use by the
addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or
confidential information.  If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this e-mail (and any attachment(s) hereto) is strictly
prohibited.  If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately
notify me at (713) 220-4436 and permanently delete the original and any copy
of such e-mail and destroy any printout of such e-mail.

 - Purchase.DOC
 - Purchase.DOC


My comments

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	01/03/2001 12:37 PM

		 To: skean@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Comments to Gov's Proposals

I've had to spend a little time negotiating this AM with ENA and EES, but I'm
confident that they'll be OK with this version.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 01/03/2001 12:40 PM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	01/03/2001 12:19 PM

		 To: skean@skytel.com, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Comments to Gov's Proposals

Here they are.  Please review and provide comments quickly.  I'd like to get
this off to Kari ASAP.  Thanks.

Jeff


Start Date: 2/27/01; HourAhead hour: 18;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001022718.txt


Pam:  Thanks for the fax.  Diomedes is correct about the 4(b)(i) payment.  Also, the calculation of the payments in respect of Eletrobolt is correct based on A=379 MW and B=50%.

Separately, I'm forwarding the email from Transredes confirming that the YABOG line hit 6 mmcmd on January 7, 2000.

rgds,
	John

From:	Pam Butler/ENRON@enronXgate on 11/12/2001 05:19 PM CST
To:	Kent Castleman/ENRON@enronXgate, John Novak/SA/Enron@Enron
cc:	Michelle Cash/Enron@EnronXGate, Mary Joyce/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject:	FW: ECI Payment

John - Diomedes disagrees with the assessment that the $315,833.30 payment under Section 4(b)(i) should not be paid.  See below.

Kent- I relayed to Diomedes that the Employment Agreement payment with respect to the 2000 IPB calculates to $0 payment.  Diomedes wants to see the accounting data.  Do you want to provide to him?

I am working on the finalization of the other payments and have indicated as such to Diomedes.

Pam
-----Original Message-----
From: Diomedes Christodoulou [mailto:diomedes@cumulouscapital.com]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 5:52 PM
To: Butler, Pam; Cash, Michelle
Subject: ECI Payment

Dear Pam,

Based on our conversation earlier today I thought it may be easier if I send this email clarifying the points in the agreement relevant to the disputed ECI payment.

I understood that the position taken by Luiz Watanabe is that no payment is currently due under clause 4(b)(i) of the Buyout Agreement because the Rio de Janeiro Project is a merchant project and as such it has no PPA.

This is an incorrect interpretation because Clause 4(b)(i) states that the the payment is due upon the EARLIER of the PPA signature date OR the Project PAYMENT date. If you then look at the definition of "SP/RJ Project Payment Date" on page 7 it tells you that it is the FIRST to occur of "Financial Closing" or "COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION". And, finally, if you go to the definition of "Commencement of Construction" on page 4 it tells you that it occurs when at least 10% of the payments to contractors have been made. This payment in other words is due many months ago as the project is now 100% complete.

If you can confirm this by tomorrow please include it in the payment otherwise proceed with whatever payment has been approved and we can do this one over the next couple of days.

Finally, regarding to the Employment Agreement payments I will need, as per our agreement, to have access to the accounting data used to determine the IPP Bonus. I think the best way is for me and my accountants to be provided with the name of an Enron accountant who has the data and authority to discuss them with us so that we can address any issues.

Thanks and look forward to hearing from you,

Diomedes.


Hi Kate, Deal # 509086.01 is still in the system at the PX index instead of
the Dow Jones SP-15 index.  This trade was done on January 30, 2001.  We just
received the new index language from Steve Hall in Portland.  I was going to
confirm this trade but it has the old index.  There is another deal done the
same day that has been changed (509087) to the new index.  I know some of the
deals that are not flowing have not been changed because Bob Badeer is still
negotiating with the counterparties.  Is this one that can be changed since
it started flowing Feb 1?

Let me know,

Thanks,
Melissa


Alaska

  2436 3:00 - 3:30 cal - sea
  2578 5:00 - 5:50 sea - pdx


My view is that we can't associated ourselves with IEP anymore.  They are
generators, who now where the black hat.  If we are going to participate, we
need to do it with some protections.


Steve.  FYI.  Got bounced back the first time.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 10/02/2000 04:32 PM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	10/02/2000 04:27 PM

		 To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Steve Kean
		 Subject: RE: Auction of Default Supplier Obligation

Have messages in to him.

	James D Steffes
	10/02/2000 02:50 PM

		 To: steve kean, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Auction of Default Supplier Obligation

Jeff --

Can you try and call Seabron today to discuss.  See if his understanding
helps with California issues.

Jim

----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 10/02/2000 02:49 PM -----

	"Seabron Adamson" <seabron.adamson@frontier-economics.com>
	10/02/2000 09:43 AM

		 To: <James.D.Steffes@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Auction of Default Supplier Obligation

Jim:

>Have you ever seen a model for a bid process like this?  Any auctions (in
>any commodity) that would work?  We are trying to get back to key policy
>makers mid-day on Monday.

Yes, there are numerous default service auction models in operation or
proposed, both in electricity and other utilities. The government of New
South Wales in Australia is implementing a model similar to this. In
Georgia, I think they recently had an auction to serve customers served by a
gas retailer that went bust. Similar mechanisms have been used for years in
the telecoms business for serving specific client bases, such as rural
customers. Examples have been in Chile, and even in the U.S. (auctions for
"universal service obligations").

We proposed a model for "third-party" default service standard supply for
Ontario (working for Aleck Dadson of Enron Canada). This allowed the
standard supply provider to meet its obligation by competitive means,
including holding an auction. The idea was to provide customers hedging in a
framework that allowed for competition in default service.

Let me know if you want a briefing or futher info. I'll be in the office
until 4:00 or so (I'm then heading to the airport for Portland). My office
number is (617) 354-0060, or (617) 513-5904 (mobile).

Seab

This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the
addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or
confidential information.  If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me at
(617) 354-0060 and permanently delete the original and any copy of any
e-mail and any printout thereof.


USA: Calif. allows SDG&E to strike bilateral power deals.

09/21/2000
Reuters English News Service
(C) Reuters Limited 2000.
SAN FRANCISCO, Sept 21 (Reuters) - California regulators on Thursday approved
an order allowing utility San Diego Gas and Electric to buy power through
bilateral contracts.
The utility had previously been mandated to buy all its power through the
Pasadena-based California Power Exchange.
The contracts can be for up to five years and must expire by December 31,
2005. The amount of power that can be bought is limited but a CPUC spokesman
could not immediately confirm details of the restriction.
Last month, the California Public Utilities Commission allowed the state's
other two investor owned utilities, Rosemead-based Southern California Edison
and San Francisco-based Pacific Gas and Electric to buy power on bilateral
contracts under similar terms.
Wholesale electricity prices have risen to record levels this year, resulting
in sharply higher power bills for SDG&E customers, who were the first in the
nation to pay market-based prices without a safety net.
The price spike for customers was exacerbated by a lack of hedging by SDG&E.
The CPUC's move to allow bilateral contracts is seen as part of an attempt to
encourage more hedging.
San Diego Gas and Electric is a unit of Sempra Energy , Southern California
Edison a subsidiary of Edison International and Pacific Gas and Electric a
unit of PG&E Corp .


Jim

Speaking with Don Miller last night he has indicated that Jeff McMahon would like to secure our membership and ongoing participation in NEPOOL and possibly other Pools, and is prepared to make cash available through the Cash Committee.

While we discussed a number of options, the starting point is to identify the contracts that are in the money to EPMI and which have not yet been terminated. The long term deals that we have been looking at in NEPOOL are NSTAR, UI and CMP. We are getting closer to an acceptable internal valuation of these and need to get a "robust" number that we can defend in order to release cash from the Cash Committee.

The three main cash related issues we need to address as I see it in the short term are: (1) We must provide NEPOOL with the comfort, possibly even in the form of a pre-pay, that we will pay our invoices for November, especially since the bonds we posted terminate on 29, December (2) We must provide cash collateral immediately and (3) We will need pay our NEPOOL invoices over a two, or possibly, one week period to reduce NEPOOL's exposure to EPMI. This creates cash flow issues as we are only paid monthly by our customers. With the one way payment issue we are facing with NSTAR and UI there is clearly little incentive for them to re-negotiate their contracts.

Turning to point (2), it is not clear to me whether we will be able to post the $137,390,360.10 and I will assume that we will not get the authority to post this but a lesser amount. In trying to provide NEPOOL with comfort as to their exposures it may be that we can get them to agree that for the foreseeable future we will only be serving certain contracts and that the collateral requirement be based solely on EPMI serving those contracts. I am not confident however that NEPOOL has the authority to what is in effect change the Financial Assurance Policy for one Participant, without approval of all Participants and approval of FERC, but we can explore this with them.

If the price of energy, ICAP and other services moves up then EPMI should be given a reasonable period of time to post further collateral. That way we can hopefully reduce the initial amount we post and if the price moves up we can elect at that point whether to retain our membership or relinquish it. While EPMI will be taking market risk, which ill not be hedged, it will have the ability to stop performing f the price moves against it. It should not be forgotten that both the NSTAR and UI deals are one way payments and there is no time limit as to when either of these counterparties can claim a default due to EPMI's bankruptcy. The effect of this being that we are at risk from a termination by these two counterparties at any time and since we are currently the "Defaulting Party" we would not receive any Early Termination Payment. CMP is a two way payment and therefore there may well be some merit in entering into a term energy purchase deal to lock in value to this contract.

I am not aware of what EES is trying to do with NEPOOL, or the other pools in the North East, however I thought it would be helpful if they knew what we were trying to do and why. Any input as to what EES is doing and any merit in a joint approach could be explored if both companies considered value could be achieved.

Finally, the recipients of this email will hopefully know of other people, for example in credit, scheduling and settlements who could assist in ensuring that we can accurately value and schedule the contracts we would like to continue performing under, please pass these on to Don Miller who is coordinating this initiative.

Regards,

Marcus


<<ltr to Kay Mann: Site specific references in GE Form agreement.DOC>>

Attached is the memo setting forth the specific Site references in the
GE Turbine Agreement.
 -  Site specific references in GE Form agreement.DOC


I haven't seen it come back.  I spoke with Lynn around Christmas, and he said
the person who would sign was out of town, but was supposed to be back last
week.  I'll be glad to follow up.   I was out last week and just haven't
worked to that point on my "to do" list.

NEPCO and EECC have signed, by the way.

Kay

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Mitch Robinson                           01/03/2001 08:48 AM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Mike J Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: SWPC Letter

Hi Kay.  Hope you had a good holiday.

Any success on the letter?

Thanks,

MItch


Please change my book from "Short Term Main" to "Short term SERC"

Thankyou,

Mike Carson
X6203


KM Project Sponsors and Task Force Members,

Attached below is the Knowledge Management Pilot Project Charter and
Executive Summary.  Please review and sign the charter by close of business
Friday, December 1.  Send signed charters to my attention at EB4734a.  If you
have any questions, feel free to contact me at 3 9698.

Thank you,

Marie Hejka


The attached Talking Points are for Ken's use in his conversations and/or
meetings with Bush Administration officials on their National Energy Plan.
We are awaiting word on a possible meeting today with Josh Bolton at 4:30.
We have confirmed a meeting Friday at 3:45 with Larry Lindsey.  Thanks


505118 has been changed to 1/26 -1/27. Still checking on missing deal.

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
01/25/2001 02:12 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: apb checkout

505118
term should be 26-27

missing deal just like deal 505118

505223 price should be 300.00

misssing 2 deals for bob, will get details.

thanks


Please, read.

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 09/29/2000
05:34 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Enron Human Resources @ ENRON                           09/26/2000
08:18 PM

Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: All Enron Houston
cc:
Subject: Important Information About United HealthCare - Please Read!

TO: Houston Area Employees Participating in the Domestic Medical Plan Benefits

You may have recently received communication from United HealthCare (UHC)
concerning Memorial Hermann Health Systems' (MHHS) decision to terminate
their contract with UHC  in the Houston/Beaumont area.  This communication
also included the names of physicians who will be dropped from the network
due to this action.  It is our intent to help you understand the situation.

It is our understanding that Memorial Herman Health Systems asked for a 40%
increase in fees - a substantial increase that would have been passed on to
you and Enron!  When United HealthCare attempted to negotiate with a counter
proposal, Memorial Hermann cancelled their contract.

While this contractual arrangement was between the hospital system and UHC,
Enron continues to support UHC in their ongoing contract negotiation
efforts.  At this time, it is only UHC which has been affected, however, it
is our understanding that Cigna has also been contacted by the hospital group
and may be in contract negotiations at this time as well.

Many doctors have obtained admission privileges to other area hospitals
within the UHC Network or have contracted directly with UHC including those
with admission privileges to The Woodlands, Sugarland and Clear Lake
Hospitals, to name a few.  In a further effort to limit disruption to our
affected employees and families who are enrolled in the UHC Network or EPO
options, Enron has authorized UHC to process claims incurred between
September 28 and December 31, 2000 as if the termination of the Memorial
Hermann Health Systems from the network had not occurred and In-Network
benefits applied.  Office visits will have a $10 copayment and all other
charges will be covered at 90%.  Hospital admissions will still need to be
pre-certified with UHC.

These steps have decreased the number of participants' affected by Primary
Care Physician disruption from 1,050 to 127.

If You Need Medical Attention:  You or your doctor/hospital must call UHC's
customer service number so proper benefits can be verified.  In some cases
the hospital or doctor may request payment at the time service is performed.
If this should happen, please obtain an itemized statement and submit it to
UHC with a claim form for prompt reimbursement.  Claim forms can be obtained
by calling 1-800-332-7979 or in Houston at 713-853-7979 ( press 1).

Open enrollment materials will be coming soon.  Take this opportunity to
consider your elections for 2001.

United HealthCare and Enron HR are committed to assisting Enron employees
through this transition.  We will communicate any  further developments that
may impact you or your family.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Enron Announcements/Corp/Enron@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Enron+20Announcements_Corp_Enron+40ENRON@ENRON.com]  On Behalf Of ClickAtHome@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, October 05, 2001 2:17 AM
To:	Clickathome Participants@ENRON
Subject:	Important Information About Security & ClickAtHome

Dear ClickAtHome Participant,

ClickAtHome is interested in making sure you have the latest security tools available to you.  As part of the ClickAtHome program, you may download and update Norton Anti-Virus and BlackICE Defender software from the ClickAtHome Portal.

Norton AntiVirus software repairs computer virus infections automatically.  It scans and cleans your hard drive, diskettes and both incoming and outgoing email.
BlackICE Defender is an industrial-strength anti-hacker system that protects your PC by scanning your DSL, cable modem, or dial-up Internet connection looking for hacker activity. When it detects an attempted intrusion, it automatically blocks traffic from that source, keeping intruders from accessing your system.
By installing and updating both Norton AntiVirus and BlackICE Defender, your ClickAtHome PC will have the latest security offered by these two products.
Instructions for accessing the Portal and downloading the software are provided below.
If you have any questions or wish to provide feedback, please email clickathome@enron.com.  Thank you for your participation in ClickAtHome.
The ClickAtHome Team!
__________________________________
To download the software:
1)  Visit the ClickAtHome Portal at www.clickathome.net from your ClickAtHome PC.
2)  Logon to the Portal with your personally created Portal User ID and Password, or create a new account if you have not created a user ID and password by selecting "Create a NEW Account" at the top left corner.  The Portal User IDs and Passwords are created by you.  The Enron Help Desk is not able to assist with Portal support, but if you need any assistance, please send an email to "clickathome@enron.com".
3) Once you have logged on, select "Tools" from the top menu bar.
4) Under the "Secure Download" heading, click on "BlackICE" or "Norton" and log on to the download page using your SAP ID and Date of Birth.
5) Follow the directions provided on screen.


I will be out of the office on Dec. 7 & 8.  Please contact one of the
paralegals for assistance.  Thanks.  Sara


Vince:

Please include Ram Vittal to the summer internship list, if you have not
already done so.
According to my count, that make a total of 8 students from the Enron Tiger
Team who have a desire to work with Enron.

Thanks,
Donna

-----Original Message-----
From: Vittal, Maheshram [mailto:mvittal@wharton.upenn.edu]
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 10:17 PM
To: 'FAP '
Subject: RE: Call from Enron

Donna:

I had submitted my resume directly to their recruiting office and haven't
heard from them.  I would be very willing to reforward my resume, if
required.

Thanks,
Ram


Jeff,
??????? The Yellow Book is in the mail. I read it over the weekend and found
it to be a very good backgrounder for this whole thing. Thanks for lending it
to me, and thanks again for your time Friday.

??????? A followup question: You had told me Friday that the arrival of QF's
and other non-utility generators, including plants in neighboring states, had
large customers chomping at the bit for competition, but frustrated because
the big IOUs still controlled the grid and held the customers captive. But
the Yellow book said that already some large customers had found ways to
bypass the IOUs and get direct access/retail wheeling.

??????? Could you explain?
??????? Thanks,
??????? Dale.
PS - Please don't forget to call Steve Kean to let him know I'll be calling
him. Thanks.


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 04/11/2001 01:55 PM -----

	Aparna Rajaram/ENRON@enronXgate
	04/11/2001 01:52 PM

		 To: Kelly Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice
Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Steve Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Camille Gerard/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya
Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ken Curry/ENRON@enronXgate, Nicole
Hunter/NA/Enron@Enron, Lesli Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate
		 cc:
		 Subject: Click Paper Approvals, 04-11-01

Please see attached.

Aparna Rajaram
Ph: (713) 345-4563
Fax: (713) 853-9476
Aparna.Rajaram@enron.com


The North American energy industry is facing some of the biggest challenges
in its history. Many important decisions need to soon be made by
policymakers to smooth the transition to a competitive marketplace in order
to address these critical challenges at this crucial moment in the
development of restructured markets.

Recognizing the need for stakeholder input, the U.S. Department of Energy
and the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC)
invite all public officials and industry stakeholders to attend the North
American Summit on Harmonizing Business Practices in Energy Restructuring.
The Summit will be held from November 29 to December 1, 2000, in Dallas,
Texas.

The Summit is designed to tackle the fundamental issues that lead to a
competitive marketplace.  Your expertise and participation are critical to
the success of this effort.  The Summit is designed to maximize interaction
between public officials and industry stakeholders.

As this will be the only joint meeting hosted by DOE and NARUC this year,
early registration is strongly encouraged. To register, go to
http://www.energymarkets.org.

Remarks from The Honorable Bob Rowe, President of NARUC and Commissioner for
the State of Montana, on the importance of the Summit:

"We now have a better understanding of some of the challenges we face in
energy restructuring.  The development of different business practices by
different agencies and network companies could become a significant
impediment to efficiently doing business across many different network
systems.  This is an issue not only for suppliers who must do business on
many networks but also for utilities who must increasingly face the
challenge of consolidating diverse network systems.  Obviously the main
beneficiary of harmonizing such efforts is the consumer."

Please send this email message to colleagues who would benefit from
receiving information about the Summit.

****************************************************************************
****************
The Center for the Advancement of Energy Markets (CAEM) is responsible for
stakeholder coordination, program development, speaker invitations, and
outreach, in coordination with DOE and NARUC.


Here is the Goldman Presentation


what time


Walkers:

I am not going to promise no more e-mails, because they keep sending them!  If they don't add any new info, I'm not forwarding to y'all.  However, this one mentions that anyone who collected > $500 can be a "star walker," and should report to the "star walker" tent on the day of the walk.

So, if you plan to walk, collected > $500, and want to be a "star walker," report to that tent the day of the walk.

Leesa

-----Original Message-----
From: Jimmy Hatzis [mailto:Jimmy.Hatzis@heart.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 8:35 PM
To: Adam Sack - JL Wortham; Adriene Stone - ExxonMobil; Allison Novak -
FMC; Alma Leal - UT HSC; Amanda Byford - Kvaerner; Ibrahim, Amr; Amy
Martinez - JL Wortham; Castanon, Ana; Angela Eaglin - Gardere; Mendez,
Angela; Angelia Hill - FMC; Angelica Quiroz - ExxonMobil; Anna
Hulslander - Methodist; Yao, Anne S.; Annette Cotton - Gardere; Aurora
Seminara - UT HSC; Baiba Gillard - UT HSC; Chapa, Barbara; Barbara
Segura - ExxonMobil; Bart Canon - JL Wortham; Trevino, Belinda; Brad
Moore - FMC; Brenda Callow - Kvaerner; Brenda Furr - ExxonMobil; Cruver,
Brian; Bud LaRue - FMC; Cal Daetwyler; Carol Wells - Kvaerner; Carolina
Asirifi - Exxon Mobil; Celeste Leimer - Wilson Supply; Villanueva,
Chantelle; Weeks, Charm; Cheri Hill - Hays; Cheryl McNeil - MHHS; Chris
Domingue - Kvaerner; Christina Hertz - Hays; Chuck Butler - Hays; Connie
Weiher - JL Wortham; Dale Johnson - Hays; Fraylon, Damon; Dan D'Armond -
BMC; Daniel Bates - ExxonMobil; Daniel Zales - FMC; Darren Mayo - FMC;
Dave Dietrich - FMC; David Madrigal - UT HSC; Debbie Garcia - UT HSC;
Deborah DeBram - ExxonMobil; Deborah Reynolds - Enron; Roman, Deborah;
Denise Haynes - ExxonMobil; Desiree Ross - ExxonMobil; Dinorah Hernandez
- JL Wortham; Donna Kanon - Methodist; Earnestine Collins - Methodist;
Elease Jenkins - UT HSC; Emily Cedillo - ExxonMobil; Eric Feighl - JL
Wortham; Erin Asprec - Methodist; Erin Schreiber - ExxonMobil; Ethelyn
Ricks - Natco; Eunice Ihaza - Methodist; Evelyn Gutierrez - Methodist;
Lodi, Fahd; Felecia Adams - Enron; Greg Faldyn - JL Wortham; Greg Patton
- ExxonMobil; Heidi Petri - Methodist; Hona Matthews - Methodist;
Houston Netherland - FMC; Hugh Benziger - JL Wortham; Jaime Smith - UT
HSC; Jamie Cole - JL Wortham; Jane Cunningham - Hudson; Janet Fagan -
Noble; Priddy, Janice; Jean Morales - UT HSC; Jennifer Bird - Methodist;
Jessica Smith - The Service Center; Jill Reynolds - Methodist; Joan
Radous - ExxonMobil; Joanie Norlund - UT HSC; Joey Garcia - Stewart
Title; John Bennett - Kvaerner; John Dietrich - Methodist; Josie Del
Toro - Stewart Title; Julie Moran - Kvaerner; Julio Fernandez - Stewart
Title; Karen Carter - Gardere; Karen Garrison - Stewart Title; Kathy
Moore - Merrill Lynch; Kathy Widaski - Hudson; Willard, Kathy; Katrina
Dunn - Methodist; Katy Robinson - Stewart Title; Kerri Salinas - Natco;
Ladye Freitag - ExxonMobil; Lashone Thomas - Hays; Laura Monroe -
Kvaerner; Leba Shallenberger - Exxon Mobil; White, Leesa; Ayers, Lesley;
Lester Byrd - ExxonMobil; Trevino, Linda S.; Lori Hill - UT HSC; Lou
Gilster - Cobb Fendley; Hall, Lyla; Maggie Garcia - JL Wortham; Mamie
Ellis - UT HSC; Marco Coronado - FMC; Maria Gordon - Natco; Marie
Staines - ExxonMobil; Marie Symmons - Wilson; Marilyn Devereaux Ruffin -
ExxonMobil; Mark Cheney - FMC; Sloan, Mary; Hamlin, Mason; Melanie
Lemelle - FMC; Melissa Mitchell - ExxonMobil; Minda LaRussa - Methodist;
Myra Burke - TGS; Nadia Noyola - Kvaerner; Nancy Jinks - FMC; Nelson Lee
- Kvaerner; Nikol Munguia - FMC; Nina Nashif - Methodist; Noah Reiter -
Rice; Pam Nugent - UT HSC; Pat Rowell - FMC; Pat Thibadeoux - JL
Wortham; Patrice Hall - Hays; Patricia Carter - Kvaerner; Paul Wallace -
Stewart Title; Paula King - Gardere; Paulette Nation - Noble; Peggy
Messer - Hays Info; Poranski, Peter; Fuller, Phyllis; PJ Richards - FMC;
Rethna Garza - Gardere; Rethna Morvant - Gardere; Denton, Rhonda L.;
Roane Thorpe - ExxonMobil; Robert Crockett - ExxonMobil; Robin Phillips
- JL Wortham; Roderick Riley - ExxonMobil; Ron Thomas - ExxonMobil;
Wood, Ron; Rosemary VanWormer - ExxonMobil; Sal Colello - FMC; Sandee
Howell - Cobb Fendley; Sandra Green - UT HSC; Sandra Marroquin - UT HSC;
Sarah Tucker - ExxonMobil; Scott Bayer - ExxonMobil; Scott Sherrill - UT
HSC; Shane Pavlas - ExxonMobil; Sharon Reuther - Hudson; Patel, Sheetal;
Sid Chaka - ExxonMobil; Macpherson, Sigrid; Silvia Guebara - Hudson;
Stephanie Driskell - Hudson; Herron, Steve; Stuart Buchanan -
ExxonMobil; Wadsworth, Sue; Susan Lewis - Enron; Suzanne Tobleman - UT
HSC; Tandy Mellard - TCH; King, Terri; Theresa Gomez - JL Wortham; Tim
Grebe - FMC; Nash, Tim; Tish McDonald - Stewart Title; Tjodi Penn -
ExxonMobil; Todd Pisciotta - Methodist; Wilbeck, Tom; Tomas Colorado -
Kvaerner; Tracy McDonald - MHHS; Trina Hillman - Hays; Dhruv, Tushar;
Sugarek, Velvet; Victor Cavazos - UT HSC; Victoria Herrera - UT HSC;
Wendy Helms - Hudson; Crooks, William; Yasmin Kazzaz - Methodist; Yvonne
Deffenbaugh - FMC; Yvonne Roberts - ExxonMobil
Subject: Heart Walk - Last minute items...

 <<FN Final.doc>>

Jimmy Hatzis
American Heart Walk Director
American Heart Association - Houston
2626 South Loop West, #510
Houston, Tx  77054
telephone   713-610-5021
fax            713-610-5200
jimmy.hatzis@heart.org


Mark,

Pursuant to our earlier conversation, I have the following questions which
relate to the Financial Services Authority's Conduct of Business rules:

1. The Agreement provides that the Broker may "from time to time effect
transactions with or for ENA in Non-Readily Realisable Investments (as
defined in the Rules)"

I presume this is acceptable, but please confirm.

2. The Agreement provides that  "the protections in the Rules on giving
suitable advice will not apply"

Again I presume this is acceptable since we will probably not be using their
advice, but please confirm.

3. The Agreement provides that "Any monies arising in the normal course of
business  will be held by our agent in accordance with the Financial Services
Regulations 1991 and the relevant rules of FSA."

Please confirm that this is acceptable.

4. The Agreement provides that it shall be governed by English law and that
ENA submits to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the English courts.  I know
that ENA has specific policies in the US relating to governing law and
submission to jurisdiction.  Please confirm with me that the above-referenced
provision is acceptable.

Thanks,

Jason


Thought you'd get a kick out of this (especially after our recent "hold
music" activity!)

Try this.   It's for real.   The following is the customer
service number for Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.

              1-800-578-7453

Dial the number and listen to their greeting message,
until the point when you are requested to choose an
extension, and then you can hang up.
The greeting message is priceless though, and worth the
time it takes to make the toll-free call.


I checked with Sean, who said he's finished entering his deals. Mike is just
finishing up with his. Jeff Richter, however, still has about 8 deals to
enter. This should be done within the next few minutes.

Please let me know if these don't come through shortly.

Thanks,
Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
11/13/2000 02:19 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Carla Hoffman/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Missing deals

I am missing alot of deals for Mike Swerzbinh and Sean Crandall.  Do you know
if they are still entering deals?


Neale / Suzanne

Below is Sheila's breakdown of the P&L impact for your reference.

As spoken with Neale earlier, we have instructed Rajah & Tann to do the
necessary searches on MTM and EPTS to establish if they have substantial
assets in Singapore. I will forward the results to you once received on order
that you may opine fully on the merits of the case and arbitration procedure.

Regards

Matt
---------------------- Forwarded by Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT on 10/08/99 01:55 PM
---------------------------

Sheila Foo
10/08/99 11:07 AM
To: Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT
cc: Russell Aeria/SIN/ECT@ECT

Subject: P/L Impact- Hyundai/ MT Pacific Valour

Hyundai:
Initial Costs  443
Freight    25
   -----
   468

Replace by purchase from (Cost 490 and freight of 54)
Enron Europe 544
   ===
Difference   76
   ===

On 3000MT Paraxylene cargo, P/L impact is -$228,000


John,

I am performing code updates to the stand-alone EOL workstation WNAEOL-48101 this evening and wanted to check with you to see at which point it would be convenient for you.  I assume after the business day would be acceptable and my intent is to start near 6:00 p.m. or, at any time you decide is convenient for you.
I called a short while ago and will do so again before proceeding, but if you receive this email and need to contact me, you may reach me at extension 5-7004.  Thanks.

Chris Jeska
Terminal Server Operations.


Effective July 16, Andy Zipper will join the Natural Gas Derivatives group in Enron Americas reporting to John Arnold.  Andy and his team have done an excellent job developing EnronOnline, as well as creating a significant commercial focus.  Please join us in thanking him for his many contributions and in wishing him the best in his new role.

Savita Puthigai, who is responsible for the EnronOnline operations group and reported to Andy, will now report to Jay Webb.  In addition to leading the platform development efforts, Jay's role will be expanded to include the EnronOnline operations group.   In his expanded role, Jay will work closely with all Enron commercial groups to continue developing the platform.

The EnronOnline e-Commerce Marketing and Origination group will report to Brad Richter, who will join Net Works from EBS.  In his new role, Brad will continue the growth and expansion of the commercial activities for EnronOnline.

Please join us in congratulating everyone on their new roles.  We look forward to their continued contributions toward the success of Enron.


Please respond to InBoxHelp
 [IMAGE].       Tonight *Mostly Cloudy* Mostly Cloudy L 68  Tomorrow *Mostly Cloudy* Mostly Cloudy H 89  TomNight *Mostly Cloudy* Mostly Cloudy L 69  SATURDAY *Intermittent Clouds* Intermittent Clouds H 88 /  L 70  SUNDAY *Partly Cloudy with Thunderstorms* Partly Cloudy with Thunderstorms H 88 / L 70      *** Severe Weather Alert!! Click here for details... ***       Current Conditions for HOUSTON        Time  1:16 pm   Temperature  83F  Humidity  62%   Wind Direction  SSE  Wind Speed  14 mph   Pressure  29.90 in  Visibility  10 miles   Weather  M/CLOUDY    Other Selected Products:    [IMAGE][IMAGE][IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE][IMAGE][IMAGE]  Weather Alarms(tm) is provided exclusively by AccuWeather, Inc. ?2001 for personal use.  Redistribution prohibited.   For additional weather products and services, visit our home site at www.accuweather.com.   If you wish to modify or cancel your subscription, please visit  Direct.AccuWeather.com

[IMAGE]
home|| about| signup| modify| cancel| samples| help| terms & conditions| contact


System Outage Notification
Outage Description:
PR1 - Apollo Production
   	Outage Description: System will be unavailable for system maintenance.

	Outage Implication: No access during this outage.
PR2 - HR Production
	Outage Description: System will be unavailable for system maintenance.

	Outage Implication: No access during this outage.

SPR5DB00 - BBP 2.0 Production
	Outage Abstract:  System will be unavailable for software maintenance.

	Outage Description: System will be unavailable for software maintenance.

Date & Time of Outage:
Outage Commences:  March 17,2002 @ 8:00 am CST
Outage Ends:  March 17,2002 @ 3:00 pm CST

Contacts:
Contact:	Contact Information:
ISC Customer Care 	713-345-4727
Kenny Shih	 800-307-9118


Start Date: 1/10/02; HourAhead hour: 5;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011005.txt


I would like to acknowledge David Portz for his hard work and diligence in drafting and actively supporting the negotiation of the Green Mountain Power all-requirements transaction in ERCOT.   David worked long hours ensuring all tight timelines were met and facilitated quick contract turnarounds on numerous occasions.

In addition to Green Mountain, David has exhibited the same hard work and diligence on other Texas transactions (San Antonio, misc. QSE contracts, etc.)


Okay, Eric.  Time to put your theory to test.  Are you a Shinto or a Jew?

http://www.speakout.com/ActivismTools/selectors/religion/

Brian T. Hoskins
Enron Broadband Services
713-853-0380 (office)
713-412-3667 (mobile)
713-646-5745 (fax)
Brian_Hoskins@enron.net


Another NDA.  The correct legal name of this entity is Foundry Networks, Inc.

-----Original Message-----
From: Evens, Timothy
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 2:22 PM
To: Jones, Tana
Subject: FW: NDA needed to be signed by Foundry

Tana,

Here is the reply that I have received from Todd.  Can you send Scott an email with your questions.

Thanks,
Tim

-----Original Message-----
From: 	Todd Harcourt [mailto:harcourt@foundrynet.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 1:14 PM
To:	Evens, Timothy
Cc:	sglass@foundrynet.com
Subject:	Re: NDA needed to be signed by Foundry

Tim,

Send the NDA to Scott Glass (sglass@foundrynet.com) he will get the NDA taken care of. Let me know how I can help!
* Todd-

At 11:02 AM 10/3/01 , you wrote:
>Todd,
>
>Thanks for the links.
>
>I have the diagram that I want to send you, but I have been asked that I
>get a NDA signed from Foundry before sending it.  Who is the person that
>I should have our legal department work with to get the NDA signed?
>
>Thanks,
>Tim
>
>
>
>
>
>**********************************************************************
>This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
>and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
>the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
>others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
>authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
>reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
>delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto)
>are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or
>evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of
>its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
>be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
>otherwise. Thank you.
>**********************************************************************

**************************************
Todd Harcourt
Gulf Coast Area
Foundry Networks System Engineer
Office (281) 296-1638
Web: http://www.foundrynet.com
**************************************


Dear Ken,

I thought you might enjoy this summary article on VOD from one of our
industry magazines.  Enron is mentioned but not interviewed so I didn't know
if you would have access to a copy.

Take care,
Mary Elizabeth

Link to article:

http://www.cvmag.com/contents/2000/0814/vod814.asp

Cut and paste:
Video on the Move
Dropping costs and rising competition are forcing operators to see
video-on-demand in a whole new light
BY SIMON APPLEBAUM
At VOD programmer Diva, the deployment forecast gets more specific, as does
the rationale behind why operators will push the action. Three factors come
into play:
* DBS penetration continues to fly and bite off operators' best customers;
* the plunging expense of video-server hardware and video-stream
transmissions, which make moot the big, prohibitive load operators have used
to justify not deploying VOD;
* the fallout from Time Warner's deal to merge with America Online --
namely, considerable encouragement to accelerate plans in every other
convergence direction they want to travel, be it digital cable services
(including near-VOD and tiers), high-speed Web surfing through cable modems,
or interactive TV.
Thus with cost and infrastructure concerns put aside, and competition
staring them in the face, operators see VOD in a new light. Now that DBS
reaches 13 million subs "and is heading for 20 million, cable is feeling the
pain," says Diva president David Zucker. "Every one of the eight largest
cable operators, every single one, will deploy or trial VOD in some manner.
The big rollouts will start the second half of the year." If they come, they
may hear another set of competitive footsteps entering the scene. Digital
subscriber line carriers such as SBC and Qwest, hunting for high-speed
Internet households, are poised to reach out and become must-see VOD TV
through Viacom subsidiary Blockbuster. With infrastructure help from Enron
Broadband Services, Blockbuster will deploy a movies-driven VOD service in a
number of cities by December, and all over the U.S. next year. The joint
venture will go after cable and DBS distribution, but off the bat, DSL will
be in the driver's seat, as routed through SBC, Qwest and other suppliers.
But right now, reality is nowhere near the perception Jacobsen and Zucker
suggest. Few multi-system owners have VOD formats fully deployed or in
trial; most MSOs don't, even though they are deep in digital-service
launches incorporating near-VOD, which takes up 30 channels or more of a
system's lineup. Video-on-demand, on the other hand, uses far fewer channels
than NVOD, because video servers, placed at or near the system's headend,
store the programming and transmit it on addressable command from
subscribers, any time, over streaming transmissions. How high is the payoff
for mass cable adoption? Try 40 to 60 percent, by 2010, of the multi-billion
dollar revenue pot home-video companies enjoy now, predicted Merrill Lynch
senior media analyst Jessica Reif-Cohen at the recent Myers interactive-TV
forum in New York.
Where the Action Is
You need more than one hand to count the number of VOD projects happening
around the country, but you don't need many more. Here's the scorecard:
 * Diva - VOD's veteran packager is doing full-deployment business in at
least 10 areas. Affiliates include AT&T Broadband in Marin County, Calif.
(outside San Francisco) and Atlanta (formerly MediaOne turf); Charter
Communications in the Atlanta suburbs; and a growing number of Insight
Communications locales (Columbus, Ohio; Rockford, Ill.; and Evansville,
Ind.) where VOD is bundled with Source Media's Local Source interactive-TV
service. Before Labor Day, Charter will add Diva to at least one of its Los
Angeles-area systems. More than 400 titles, from movie blockbusters to
special-interest videos, are available each month. Top films go for $3.95 a
pop, while classic flicks and other titles get priced at $2.95 or below.
Available attractions include library shows from ESPN, TNT, Discovery and
other cable nets. About 15,000 subs use the service at least once a month.
 * Time Warner - Cable's second-largest operator is in full VOD blast,
following a trial run in Austin, Texas, last summer. Honolulu became the
first Time Warner locale to make VOD available system-wide earlier this
year, covering about 250,000 subs. Tampa, Fla., turned on in June, according
to Concurrent Computer, which provides servers and streaming tech to Time
Warner. About 100,000 Tampa-area subs are getting their day in the VOD sun.
* Intertainer - After two years of development and tests, the VOD player
that includes Microsoft, Comcast, NBC, Sony and Intel among its equity
stakeholders will soon premiere in Comcast's suburban Baltimore system. That
follows DSL rollouts in U S West's Denver enterprise and Cincinnati under an
independent franchiser. The service has plenty of interactive features to
accompany the content, including opportunities to order an artist's CD after
watching his music video; local information retrieval; and e-commerce
choices. Intertainer CEO Jonathan Taplin promises a "stunning"
MSO-affiliation announcement over the next few weeks.
* In Demand - PPV's kingpin player was already talking to affiliates about
VOD rollouts and trials when new president Stephen Brenner assumed his post
earlier this summer (see sidebar, p. 30).
* TVN - In Demand's closest PPV/NVOD rival, whose affiliate base consists of
mid-size and small system owners, is in the midst of several VOD technical
and marketing trials. Some rollout announcements are expected early this
fall. Like Diva and Intertainer, TVN wants to combine programming with
interactive applications.
 * DemandVideo - This California-based firm surfaced this spring, initially
on a quest for cable overbuilder affiliates so that they wouldn't be absent
from VOD activity. Seren Innovations (which runs its systems under Astound
Cable TV) and Knology signed up before the National Cable TV Association
convention, and Seren put Demand's format through a 25-home trial in St.
Cloud, Minn. But at NCTA's show in May, Demand CEO Rajiv Juluria insisted
that his product will be available to all comers, entrenched or encroacher.
Knology will launch the service among hotels in Panama City, Fla., while
Seren commits to a full St. Cloud rollout, plus deployment in Contra Costa
County, Calif.
* E-Video TV - A new VOD player out of Scottsdale, Ariz., E-Video has
developed download technology through which digital cable subs can retrieve
feature films, programming and interactive games. Roy Bennett, E-Video's
president, says his firm will try the process out with a cable operator
before summer ends.
Up ahead in the player pipeline: StreamBox and AlwaysonTV.com, two ventures
running both video and Internet content. Both exhibited two months ago at
Streaming Media East in New York. Within VOD's own tech vendordom --
companies that provide video servers and program-insertion gear to operators
-- there's growing consensus that the on-demand era launches this fall. How
fast VOD takes off is more in the hands of set-top box providers than MSOs,
believes Concurrent CEO Steve Nussrallah. The sooner they flood the scene
with digital converters, the sooner deployments happen.  "We're at the front
door of an explosion. Late fall or early next year is the right time for
this market to happen," he says. "The only thing holding the market back is
the ability of set-top vendors to build and ship their product at a level
equal to the demand. By the end of 2004, we should be north of 30 million
digital set-tops, with the vast majority of them VOD-enabled. Deployment by
operators becomes a no-brainer." AOL Time Warner will push operators into
deployment decisions, adds nCube president Michael Pohl. "The convergence of
Time Warner's content with the broadband opportunities AOL looks at will
drive the content and availability of content for VOD," Pohl suggests.
"Movies are OK and great, probably a good place to start, but ultimately,
viewers want to go to their operator and ask for whatever they want to see."
"You see the operators showing excitement for VOD now, as opposed to the
vendors showing excitement, which is what it was for the last few years,"
says Yvette Gordon, interactive technologies VP at SeaChange Technologies.
"The AOL-Time Warner merger helps."
The Naysayers
But many people don't buy it. Take Playboy Television -- they're supplying
product to selected Diva and Time Warner VOD markets. They're in the game,
but Playboy TV president Jim English doesn't look for a breakout market
until 2002. Why? Despite big declines in server cost, "you need so many per
state, so many per [sub universe]," English reasons. "The more subs on the
line, the slower the traffic goes. It's still very expensive electronics.
I'm not trying to poke holes at anyone, but a lot of projections about this
industry didn't come out as advertised. How many years did it take for
digital cable to move? Even now, operators have more trucks dedicated to
installing high-speed cable modems than digital cable. And on cable's agenda
priority scale, just getting the digital box in is number one." For
Susquehanna Communications and Classic Cable, 2001 is the year VOD will make
it to their systems, provided the tech issues English raises get resolved.
As big as the case is for getting economics down enough for deployment among
large MSOs, it's magnified several times over for owners the size of
Susquehanna and Classic.  "Insight, for example, can serve tens or hundreds
of thousands of customers from a single headend. The best we can do is 7,000
customers from a single headend. For the small, non-metro markets we
service, how do you amortize the cost for initial equipment installation?"
asks Classic CEO Merritt Belisle. "When you take into account the
flexibility and long-term viability of the tech, and different content
avenues, there's a lot that's nascent and in development," responds Dan
Templain, Susquehanna's corporate marketing/programming director. "The
content and the tech have to become compelling enough to consumers that
we're willing to roll it out." Still, Templain's company is determined to do
a field trial somewhere this fall, and get deployment underway before the
end of next March. "That's accelerated thinking from where we were six
months ago." To SVOD or Not to SVOD? On the programming side, the train
everyone wants to be aboard is making VOD a diverse medium, perhaps to the
point where the medium should be relabeled "COD" -- for content-on-demand.
Movies, available at or earlier than home-video release, lead the way, but
not far behind are sports, live/taped events from all over, how-to and
special-interest videos, children's fare, games, adult entertainment and a
few genres spun out of the imagination of others.  "There may be
localized-content opportunities," chirps In Demand's Jacobsen. "Local
theater, high school football games with real community value." In a COD
world, "you're not limited to video product," says TVN senior business
development VP Jim Riley. "Eventually, you download computer software so you
can view it on your TV as well as on your PC. That's where we're driving
some of our development energies." TVN's vehicle is Chromazone, involving
California-based venture capitalist Digital Evolution. From the start,
Intertainer has embraced a link of COD with interactive elements. "If MSOs
make the investment in VOD, they must maximize it with advertising,
e-commerce and all sorts of interactivity," says Jonathan Taplan,
Intertainer's president and CEO. "That's the ultimate promise. If you think
about the capital investment and the possible return in gross revenues, like
$20 a sub per month, that's a damn good business." Diva, infused with $9
million earlier this summer from operating system/middleware players OpenTV
and Liberate Technologies (CV, 7/17/00, p. 98), now has economic backing to
pursue its own interactive-integration course. And soon, cable operators
will see if their VOD future should incorporate subscription
video-on-demand, or SVOD. Encore Media Group, under CEO John Sie, is betting
a substantial chunk of its future on it, and in a matter of weeks, AT&T
Broadband's newly acquired Atlanta system (off the completed MediaOne
merger) will test SVOD out using Encore, Starz! and Encore's multiplex
movies. Here's the SVOD deal, as Sie explains it: Premium service subs, for
an extra fee, get 20-30 titles running on that service that month on-demand,
with VCR functionality. The subs watch those films whenever they want, as
many times as they want, for that one fee. Six or eight dollars a month will
do. "We're using VOD as a viewer enhancement platform," Sie insists. "Movies
will drive things first. Once they drive penetration, you can do
subscription news-on-demand and other things on-demand." Lately, Sie's SVOD
advocacy comes framed inside a clarion call to move operators in the
direction of all-digital system conversion. Direct broadcast satellite
services are that way now, and Sie believes cable system owners have two
years at most to make that transition, contrary to the seven-to-10-year
timeframe other industry execs predict. "You know and I know consumer demand
for digital far exceeds set-top box availability, as well as the supply of
installation crews. DBS realized that and now they're ramping up," Sie
believes. But opponents find two flaws in SVOD: Because the product is
available in the premium window, six months or more after PPV availability,
there may not be as much audience demand for it compared to pre-PPV.
Independent of audience demand, there's the specter of cannibalization,
where on-demand use comes at the expense of premium-channel viewing. "Here's
a way to enhance and optimize premium services," Nussrallah concludes. "If
you get constant access to the programming, it's more customer-friendly, and
something DBS can't provide. Cable is built on the concept that the audience
buys more if they have more choice and convenience. It may be the next
opportunity window." Not so, Taplin figures. "It would be cool to get all of
The Sopranos on a VOD package. But why would people who already see movies
on premium pay for more of those same movies, after they've had the chance
to watch those movies in an on-demand way. Unless Sie prices it so low, or
unless they like those movies a lot, why would they pay again? The flat-fee
model is a great model, like cellular-phone pricing. People love paying one
fee for unlimited monthly use. But the window isn't the right window." Sie
defends SVOD as an enhancement option. "Would an operator launch digital
cable with pay TV only and not launch PPV, concluding that PPV cannibalizes
pay, or vice versa? No, because they complement each other beautifully. Same
here." Other VOD programmers and tech vendors will pursue SVOD experiments.
TVN is investigating one or more affiliate partnerships for a test. Classic
and Susquehanna are open to proposals. "What John says is super. What does
it cost me? I've got a stock market and bond market to work with," Belisle
says.
Stream Thinking
Susquehanna exec Templain calls SVOD "a work in progress platform." Others
say the same about streamed video content, another pot worthy of industry
exploitation. "Spectacular" may be the most accurate adjective for the
assortment of video Internet sites have streamed to PC households
everywhere, from quirky animation to short films to news clips. More
diverse, longer streamed content is coming down the pike. Will the very same
tech making mass VOD deployment possible now also make possible a new
original content pipe? What an ironic circumstance. Check in with the sites
themselves, from Real Networks on down, and the masterminds behind them
point to TV and cable display as their final destination. Fifty million PCs,
more than 100 million TV homes, almost 70 percent of them cabled -- the
market's obvious to them. In the end, that's the ticket, cable execs concur.
But for the near term, no. The broadcast quality's not there yet (although
tech strides are happening), and there's considerable fear that producers
will use streaming to bypass cable nets. Gordon targets mid to late 2001 as
the point where streamed content will be TV/VOD-suitable. Assuming the
industry locks its fears away, nCube's Pohl sides with the crowd awaiting
"this kind of ubiquitous media, where things go to the TV or PC." "We're
sleeping fine at night about this, because the quality is not there yet,"
adds Diva's Zucker. "But we will make video streaming a Holy Grail for TV in
the next few years, and cable will be uniquely positioned to take advantage
of it." *

 <<...>>
HOME </> | CURRENT ISSUE </contents/2000/0814/> | BACK ISSUES </contents/> |
DATABASE </database/> | LINKS </links/> | ABOUT US </about_cv/>  All
contents , 2000 Cahners Business Information. <http://www.cahners.com> All
rights reserved. Cablevision is a registered trademark of Cahners Business
Information.


Also invited Lou Pai, Dave Duran, Dave Parquet, Sean Holmes, John Henderson,
Marty Sunde, Jim Fallon


Telecommunications Reports presents . . . . . TR's State NewsWire
January 18, 2001 P.M. Edition

STATES
CALIFORNIA -- Davis nominates new PUC commissioner
INDIANA -- Appeals court rejects cable TV late fee refunds
D.C. -- Suit alleges Verizon is unable to deliver on DSL promises
WISCONSIN -- PSC sets depreciation rates for fixed capital
KANSAS -- Task force recommends extending E911 fee to wireless users
ARIZONA -- Lawmakers examine costs of street cuts to bury fiber
MISSISSIPPI -- Sen. Robertson takes aim at telemarketers
CALIFORNIA -- Davis unveils $167 million in education technology grants
NEW YORK -- Bill aims to create comprehensive telecom privacy law
ARKANSAS -- Bill would prohibit use of wireless phones while driving
IOWA -- NewPath launches DSL service in Des Moines

FUTURE OF REGULATION
CALIFORNIA
Davis nominates new PUC commissioner

Gov. Gray Davis (D.) has nominated Geoffrey Brown to serve as a Public
Utilities Commissioner.  The nomination requires Senate confirmation.
Davis' staff told TR the Senate has one year to act on the
confirmation.  The PUC staff told TR Brown won't begin his term during
today's commission meeting.

Brown would succeed Josiah Neeper, whose term expired Dec. 31, 2000.

Brown is the public defender for the city and county of San Francisco.
He first was elected to the position in 1978 and was reelected in 1982,
1986, 1990, 1994, and 1998.

VIDEO
INDIANA
Appeals court rejects cable TV late fee refunds

The Indiana Court of Appeals has determined that Time Warner
Entertainment Co. L.P.'s cable TV customers aren't entitled to refunds
of late fees they paid but later challenged as excessive.  But the court
remanded to the Marion Superior Court the issue of whether Time Warner
needs the late fees to cover its costs.

In 1998 several Time Warner subscribers filed a lawsuit against the
company claiming that its $4.65 late fee was "excessive, unreasonable,
and a penalty."  The plaintiffs sought recovery of the fees they had
paid and injunctive relief to prohibit the company from continuing to
charge the allegedly excessive fees.

Time Warner cited a study in which it had determined that the 202,000
delinquent customers caused the company to incur costs of $1 million,
amounting to a $5.11 net monthly cost per delinquency.  The company,
therefore, argued that the $4.65 fee doesn't even cover its costs.

On July 9, 1999, the Marion Superior Court dismissed the plaintiffs'
claims for monetary damages.  But in August 1999 the court granted the
plaintiffs' "motion to correct errors" and directed late fee refunds.
Time Warner took that decision to the state appeals court.

Time Warner argued that the "voluntary payment" doctrine bars the
plaintiffs from receiving any monetary damages.  Citing a 1974 case, the
appeals court noted that the general rule is "a voluntary payment made
under a mistake or in ignorance of law, but with a full knowledge of all
the facts, and not induced by any fraud or improper conduct on the part
of the payee, cannot be recovered back."  (City of Evansville v. Walker,
162 Ind. App. 121, 318 N.E.2d 388, 389 (1974))

The appeals court found that the potential loss of cable TV service or
the threat of litigation doesn't constitute "the type of compulsion
necessary to render the late fee payments involuntary.  Review of the
plaintiffs' complaints does not reveal the possibility of any other
compulsion."

The appeals court said the Marion Superior Court is the appropriate
venue for determining whether Time Warner's late fee is cost-justified.
"This approach both allows the trial court to perform its gatekeeping
function at the summary judgment stage of the proceedings and avoids
placing an onerous burden upon the nonmoving party," the court said.

Judge Carr L. Darden wrote the panel's decision, which was joined by
Judges Melissa S. Mattingly and Sanford M. Brook.  (Case no.
49A02-9910-CV-719 - Time Warner Entertainment Co. L.P., vs. Kelly J.
Whiteman and Jean Wilson)

ADVANCED SERVICES
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Suit alleges Verizon is unable to deliver on DSL promises

A Washington, D.C., law firm has filed a class-action lawsuit against
Verizon Communications, Inc., and Verizon Internet Services, Inc., in
the Superior Court of the District of Columbia on behalf of "all persons
and entities throughout the U.S." who have purchased digital subscriber
line (DSL) service from Verizon.

The complaint alleges Verizon failed to keep its marketing promises to
provide continuously available DSL service except for regularly
scheduled maintenance.  The two D.C. residents representing the
purported class say they experienced "significant access disruptions and
significant delays in obtaining technical service."

The complaint seeks an injunction to prevent Verizon from continuing to
sell DSL Internet access until the service problems are resolved and to
require Verizon to compensate customers for the poor service.

The plaintiffs allege that Verizon was aware that it wouldn't be able to
provide DSL service as promised.  Verizon knew its customers would
experience significant disruptions and delays obtaining support, yet it
still "engages in extensive advertising" to promote DSL service and
continues to "sign up more than 3,000 new customers a day," the
complaint says.

The law firm's lead attorney in the case, Gary E. Mason, said, "Verizon
is acutely aware of the service interruptions and service delays, yet
has failed to disclose these problems to current and potential
customers."

A Verizon Internet Services spokesman said the company wouldn't comment
directly on the complaint but noted that DSL technology still is new and
"evolving rapidly, with the attendant stress and strain."  The spokesman
said Verizon will continue to support the technology and is committed to
providing good service.

The law firm representing the plaintiffs is Cohen, Milstein, Hausfeld,
and Toll P.L.L.C.  A copy of the complaint is available at
http://www.cmht.com/casewatch/cases/verizon.pdf.  (Superior Court for
the District of Columbia, Bruce G. Forrest and Leslie B. Forrest v.
Verizon Communications, Inc., and Verizon Internet Services, Inc.)

FUTURE OF REGULATION
WISCONSIN
PSC sets depreciation rates for fixed capital

The Public Service Commission has reviewed its guidelines for
establishing classes of fixed capital that telecom utilities use for
public utility purposes, the range of annual depreciation rates for each
of those classes, and the composite range of annual depreciation rates
for all classes of fixed capital.  The commission set the range or
annual depreciation rates at 6.25% to 9.25% for all classes of fixed
capital.

The PSC must conduct the review biennially, pursuant to state law (Wis.
Stat. sect. 196.09(9)(a)(2).  The PSC's order and the guideline for
depreciation rates are available at
http://www.psc.state.wi.us/pdffiles/ord_notc/2881.PDF.  (Docket no.
05-DT-104 - In the Matter of Prescribing Classes of Fixed Capital, a
Range of Annual Depreciation Rates, and a Composite Range of Annual
Depreciation Rates for All Classes of Fixed Capital)

WIRELESS
KANSAS
Task force recommends extending E911 fee to wireless users

The state's Wireless E911 Task Force has recommended extending the
existing monthly wireline user fee of up to 75 cents per user to
wireless users to fund wireless E911 emergency response services.  The
task force's recommendation was included in its final report to the
Legislature.

During the 2000 session, the Legislature passed a measure that directed
the governor to convene a task force to determine "critical" issues
surrounding wireless E911 implementation.  (4/26/00 a.m.)  The issues
examined by the task force included (1) what mechanism should be used to
administer the service, (2) whether an oversight board should be formed,
and (3) how and what costs should be recovered.

The task force "strongly" recommended integrating the administration of
wireless E911 with wireline E911 at the local level.  The task force
said local problems would be handled best at the local level.  It
concluded that a state oversight board would be unnecessary and only
would add another layer of coordination and decision-making.

The task force suggested, however, that an entity act as a
"clearinghouse" for information.  That entity also could act as an
adviser to local government and PSAP (public safety answering point)
operators on policy, training, and education matters.

Additionally, the task force said it was "generally accepted" that PSAPs
could recover all incremental costs for providing phases 1 and 2 of E911
service.  The task force said, "It is also generally assumed that the
local exchange carriers will recover their costs through tariffs or
contracts."

The issue at hand, the task force said, was whether wireless carriers
should be able to share in the proceeds of the wireless user fee to
recover their cost.  The task force recommended that any incremental
cost private-sector companies incurred as a result of federal mandates
be eligible for cost recovery.

The full report is available at
http://www.kcc.state.ks.us/utilities/911tf.htm.

STATE & LOCAL GOVERNMENT
ARIZONA
Lawmakers examine costs of street cuts to bury fiber

During this session state legislators will consider how much telecom
companies should be required to pay to install their lines, legislative
staff told TR.  The staff said cities throughout the state have been
drafting a study examining the true cost of cutting up streets to lay
fiber optic cable.  The cities say ripping up streets to bury cables
shortens the life spans of the roads.

The legislative staff added that the cities want to be held harmless for
the cost and want telecom companies to pay more than the actual cost of
tearing up and repairing their roads.  The cities want to be compensated
for the shortened life span of the road.

Lawmakers will be examining whether the telecom companies must pay up
front for the shorter life span and how to differentiate between
problems caused by telecom companies ripping up roads and the cities
ripping up roads for various repairs.  The staff said legislators hope
to balance fairness with predictability, enabling companies to have an
understanding of how much they'd be expected to pay before they dig.

Legislative language addressing street cuts is expected to be added to
SB 1128, the staff told TR.  SB 1128 is a "shell bill," which is a
holding a place for the legislation.  Sen. Scott Bundgaard (R., District
19) is sponsoring the bill.

CUSTOMER-AFFECTING
MISSISSIPPI
Sen. Robertson takes aim at telemarketers

Sen. Thomas E. Robertson (R., District 51) has introduced SB 2362 to
block telephone solicitors from calling consumers who inform the Public
Service Commission that they object to such calls.  The PSC would have
to create a "no-call" database containing telephone numbers of consumers
who don't want calls from solicitors.  Telephone solicitors wishing to
conduct business in Mississippi would have to purchase access to the
database and register with the PSC.

Even when calling a consumer not listed in the no-call database,
telephone solicitors would have to state their name and reason for
calling at the beginning of each call.  Calls could be made only Monday
through Saturday between 8 a.m. and 9 p.m.

The PSC would promulgate the rules necessary to implement the Act and
would investigate alleged violations.  If a telephone solicitor violated
SB 2362, the PSC could issue a cease-and-desist order or call for a
civil penalty of up to $5,000 per violation.  Consumers listed in the
no-call database that still received calls from solicitors could
complain to the PSC.

Caller ID providers, local exchange telephone companies, and long
distance companies wouldn't be held liable for any other party that
violated SB 2362.

SB 2362 has been referred to the Public Utilities Committee, and a
meeting to discuss the bill could take place as early as Jan. 25.  Two
similar bills, SB 2075 and SB 2267, have been introduced by Sens. Delma
Furniss (D., District 11) and Robert P. Chamberlin (R., District 1),
respectively.  The committee chairman, however, is most likely to
consider SB 2362, the legislative staff told TR.

ADVANCED SERVICES
CALIFORNIA
Davis unveils $167 million in education technology grants

Gov. Gray Davis (D.) has released $167 million in education technology
grants for high schools to help fulfill his commitment to make
up-to-date technology available to high school students.  More than
108,000 multimedia and Internet-capable computers will be added to high
schools as a result of these grants.

Bringing the computers into the schools will bring the statewide ratio
of students to multimedia computers down to 5-1.  When existing
computers are factored in, the statewide ratio of students to all
computers will be about 3.8-1, down from 7-1.  More than 1,800 high
schools will receive grants under the programs.

The grants also will help 155 high schools offer students four or more
Advanced Placement (AP) courses when they open in fall 2001.  Those
schools will receive $4 million of the funds to purchase Internet wiring
and computer hardware for students to access online AP courses.

The governor added that another $8 million in technology grants will be
awarded in the next few weeks.

CUSTOMER-AFFECTING
NEW YORK
Bill aims to create comprehensive telecom privacy law

Sen. Carl Kruger (D., District 21) has introduced privacy legislation
(SB 619) to regulate the collection, use, and disclosure of personal
information by telecom carriers.  The bill would establish
"comprehensive privacy protection for subscribers to all forms of
telecommunications services."

It would allow carriers to collect and use "personally identifiable
information" of customers only to the extent necessary to provide
service or in other limited circumstances, such as in response to a
court subpoena.  Carriers would have to obtain customers' affirmative
consent before selling or otherwise disclosing personal information to
third parties.

SB 619 also would prohibit the disclosure, without consent, of
information gathered by monitoring lines to analyze individual use
patterns.

The bill has been referred to the Senate Committee on Energy and
Telecommunications.

WIRELESS
ARKANSAS
Bill would prohibit use of wireless phones while driving

Rep. Kim Hendren (R., District 1) has introduced a bill aimed at
preventing drivers from using wireless phones while operating vehicles.

HB 1229 would allow drivers to use wireless phones designed for
hands-free use as long as they kept both hands on their steering
wheels.  Exceptions would be made for drivers using wireless phones to
report emergency situations and for law enforcement and emergency
response personnel using wireless phones while driving as part of their
jobs.

First time violations of HB 1229 would be punishable by a warning, and
subsequent violations would carry a fine of up to $50.

HB 1229 has been referred to the House Committee on Public
Transportation.

COMPETITIVE LOCAL ENTRY
IOWA
NewPath launches DSL service in Des Moines

NewPath Holdings, Inc., has begun providing digital subscriber line
service to small and midsize businesses in the Des Moines area.  The
company now serves 13 markets in seven states.

Federal law prohibits duplication in any form, including electronic,
without permission of the publisher.

TR's State NewsWire Copyright 1998, 1999, 2000 Telecommunications
Reports International, Inc. (ISSN 1082-9350) is transmitted each
business day at 8 a.m. and 2 p.m., except holidays.
Telecommunications Reports International, Inc.
1333 H St. NW, Suite 100-E
Washington, DC 20005-4707

Associate Editor for Online Publications: Jennifer Erschen, E-mail:
jerschen@tr.com
Senior Legislative & Regulatory Analyst: Gayle Kansagor, E-mail:
gkansagor@tr.com
Senior Research Analyst: Steve Arlowe, E-mail: sarlowe@tr.com
Senior Analyst: Barney McManigal, E-mail: bmcmanigal@tr.com
Account Services: Eileen Callahan (202) 312-6116, (202) 842-3023 (fax)
E-mail: ecallahan@tr.com


Elizabeth,

Yes, she referred Norberto to us. We had an informal interview
with him.

We would like to  invite him for a round of formal interviews later this week.
Please include me, Tanya Tamarchenko, Ted Murphy, Krishnarao Pinnamaneni,
Grant Masson.

I asked Liza to talk to you to set up formal arrangements with Enron
HR (a contract, fee schedule approval, etc.).

I shall ask you for help next week when we have more information:
several members of our group  from London will rotate through our Houston
office this summer. We shall need help in making living  arrangements,
including apartments, car, etc. Also, we have an employee from India
rotating through our group this summer. Please, let me know
who is the best person in HR to ask for assistance.

Vince

	From:  Elizabeth Grant                           05/05/2000 08:10 AM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Resume - Norberto Valdes

Vince,

Lisa Woods Ford (Independent Recruiter) tells me that she has referred this
resume to you.  Any interest in setting Norberto up for interviews?

- Elizabeth
---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth Grant/HOU/ECT on 05/05/2000
08:08 AM ---------------------------

nvaldes@txuenergy.com on 05/03/2000 09:32:29 AM
To: Elizabeth.grant@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Norberto's Resume

Dear Elizabeth
     Per our conversation here is Norberto's Resume. Thanks.
                              Lisa Ford
(See attached file: resumen 4.doc)

 - resumen 4.doc


Queen Sand Resources, Inc. changed its name to DevX Energy, Inc.  The short
name on this record will be changed tomorrow afternoon, Tue, Dec. 12, if
there are no objections.

Thanks,

Cheryl x3-3103


Are you on of this?  DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 02/17/2000
08:35 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Eric Benson                           02/16/2000 03:35 PM

To: Philip Crowley/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Colleen Raker/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Louis
Soldano/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Dari Dornan/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Maria
Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Dorothy
McCoppin/FGT/Enron@Enron, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Stephen
Allen/OTS/Enron@ENRON, David L Johnson/OTS/Enron@ENRON
cc: Michael Moran/GPGFIN/Enron@Enron

Subject: 1999 Enron Corp. Compliance Report

To: Distribution
From: Eric Benson

 You all should have received by now a photocopy of the 1998 Compliance
Report from the Enron Gas Pipeline Group Compliance Committee that may be
used to report 1999 compliance report activities.  In my January 5, 2000 memo
to you all, we requested that handwritten comments/updates be provided to my
attention by February 15th.

 I have yet to receive any such comments/updates.  Please provide any
comments/updates by the end of this week so the report can be finalized and
sent to Sharon Butcher within the time frame she requested.  If there are no
comments/updates, please let me know.

Thanks,

Eric Benson
Research Analyst


Please kill this request.   I get 4 everyday.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	ARSystem <ARSystem@mailman.enron.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, December 10, 2001 7:25 PM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.
Subject:	Your Approval is Overdue: Access Request for punit.rawal@enron.com

This request has been pending your approval for  16 days.  Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000076650&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000076650
Request Create Date : 11/19/01 2:40:19 PM
Requested For       : punit.rawal@enron.com
Resource Name       : Market Data Kobra Crude
Resource Type       : Applications


Kay:

This needs to be handeled by Chris Calger's group. I think Bill Williams is
his point person (Chris will sign it, though).

Regards,

Ben

	From:  Kay Mann @ ENRON                           09/11/2000 12:27 PM

To: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Change Order #3

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 09/11/2000 12:27
PM ---------------------------

"Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)" <kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com> on 09/08/2000 04:25:33 PM
To: "Johnson, Lee L (PS, SSEP)" <lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com>,
"'chris.booth@enron.com'" <chris.booth@enron.com>, "'kay.mann@enron.com'"
<kay.mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Change Order #3

Lee, Chris and Kay:

Attached is a draft of the Change Order #3 for the Las Vegas Cogen project.
Kay, I will be in Houston on Monday through Wednesday afternoon, but will be
busy most of Tuesday.  Lee had hoped that we could get together, or at least
talk, about this and the facility agreement and payment for Change Order #2.
How is your late Monday afternoon looking?

Kent

 <<Amendment Number 3.doc>>


Start Date: 4/16/01; HourAhead hour: 7;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041607.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 7 / Preferred:  12.00 / Final:  11.98)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/16/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_LUCKY
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
+++ Hour 7 - bad data from ISO.
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/16/01
  TRADING_SC: PGAE
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1


To all,

I'm on board with Kieth's comments.  I just want to make sure we are all relaying the same message to the ENA organization - dotted/solid line... whatever.   Also, we are going to have to sell the resulting structure/processes/division of responsibility to the ENA origination teams so that we don't create unnecessary divisions.   This has been the case in the past - something we have all been working hard to avoid.

Regards,
Brian

From:	Keith Dodson@ENRON on 03/20/2001 09:09 AM
To:	Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:	Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Stanley/EU/Enron@ENRON
Subject:	Re: Dotted versus straight lines

Louise,

I left a message with Brian after receiving his phone message this morning, but have not had a chance to talk with him.  I have told no one solid or dotted line. In response to a direct question from Bruce Golden in Brian's group about what the reference to Development Engineers meant in the announcement, I told him Development Engineers were "connected" to EEOS as a part to technical quality control from a corporate perspective.  With others, Brian Stanley and I have used the concept that the Development Engineers are aligned to the Business Units but seconded from EEOS.  This allows movement to best satisfy corporate needs if required.  We felt this approach fits our none profit center aligned to Wholesale charter. As you state, we still have to work the details of our role in support of the Wholesale Business Units.

Aside, I have the least concerns with Brian's group. With Brian, we have a focal point to communicate above the day-to-day chatter and navigate over the hurdles left stacked with EE&CC baggage.

Brian Stanley is planning to spend a couple of weeks here sorting these types of issues.

Keith Dodson

	Louise Kitchen@ECT 03/20/2001 08:39 AM 	   To: Keith Dodson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Brian Stanley/EU/Enron@ENRON  cc: Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT  Subject: Dotted versus straight lines

Until there is another agreement between the three of you the message is:

The technical staff in Enron Americas will continue to report on a straight line to Brian who will work out the nature of his dotted line to the new group in the future.

Let's keep the business as usual, no change message to avoid any further miscommunications until you all sit down together.

Thanks

Louise

<Embedded StdOleLink>