Make a Reservation      On Time  AWA is #1    America West ranks number one in on-time performance among all major carriers as recorded in the latest Air Travel Consumer Report published by the U.S. Department of Transportation. Learn more .    Spring Training  Spring Training in Arizona    Arizona is the home to Cactus league spring training. This year's training schedule begins Wednesday, 2/27/02 and ends on Sunday, 3/31/02.  Get away from the daily grind and let America West "take you out to the ball game."  View Details     Spring Training  10% Off Group Fares    Save an additional 10% on our already low group fares when you purchase your tickets by Thursday, February 28 and complete travel by Sunday, June, 2, 2002. View Details    Fare Sales   [IMAGE]   Spring Fever Sale It's time to catch spring fever with great fares to exciting America West destinations across the country. View Details   LA, Las Vegas, San Francisco Sale Save on off-peak travel from Las Vegas, Los Angeles or San Francisco to select America West destinations nationwide. View Details   Night Owl Sale If you like to fly at night, here are some great nighttime fares between Los Angeles, Las Vegas and San Francisco and select America West destinations nationwide. View Details   Pacific Northwest Sale Take advantage of great roundtrip savings from the Pacific Northwest to many America West destinations. Fares are discounted by 10%. View Details   americawest.com Sale Take advantage of roundtrip fares from $68 to $198 for travel to many America West destinations. View Details   First Class Sale Save big on First Class travel (excluding flights to/from Mexico). Take advantage of these discounts to see just how great First Class travel can be. View Details  Ticketmaster    ticketmaster      Weekend Surf'n Go Sports Fares February 16-19, 2002   Support your favorite team on the road or attend a great cultural event out of town next weekend with Surf'n Go Sports.  These specials are for events between 2/16 - 2/17/02.     Professional Basketball   [IMAGE] Event   Departure City Destination City Fares Atlanta at Golden State   Atlanta, GA San Francisco, CA $198      Atlanta, GA San Jose, CA $198      Atlanta, GA Oakland, CA $198  Dallas at Los Angeles   Dallas/Ft. Worth, TX Los Angeles, CA $178      Dallas/Ft. Worth, TX Orange/Santa Ana, CA $178      Dallas/Ft. Worth, TX Burbank, CA $178      Dallas/Ft. Worth, TX Ontario, CA $178      Dallas/Ft. Worth, TX Long Beach, CA $178  Dallas at Phoenix   Dallas/Ft. Worth, TX Phoenix, AZ $158  Los Angeles at Portland   Los Angeles, CA Portland, OR $138      Orange/Santa Ana, CA Portland, OR $138      Burbank, CA Portland, OR $138      Ontario, CA Portland, OR $138      Long Beach, CA Portland, OR $138  Portland at Los Angeles   Portland, CA Los Angeles, CA $138      Portland, CA Burbank, CA $138      Portland, CA Ontario, CA $138      Portland, CA Long Beach, CA $138            College Basketball - Men   [IMAGE] Event   Departure City Destination City Fares Arizona at USC   Tucson, AZ Orange/Santa Ana, CA $78      Tucson, AZ Burbank, CA $78      Tucson, AZ Ontario, CA $78      Tucson, AZ Long Beach, CA $78  Arizona St. at UCLA   Phoenix, AZ Los Angeles, CA $68      Phoenix, AZ Orange/Santa Ana, CA $68      Phoenix, AZ Burbank, CA $68      Phoenix, AZ Ontario, CA $68      Phoenix, AZ Long Beach, CA $68  San Diego St. at    San Diego, CA Colorado Springs, CO $168  Colorado St.   San Diego, CA Denver, CO $168            College Basketball - Women   [IMAGE] Event   Departure City Destination City Fares Colorado St. at    Colorado Springs, CO San Diego, CA $168  San Diego St.   Denver, CO San Diego, CA $168  NAU at Sacramento St.   Flagstaff, AZ Sacramento, CA $178  Ohio St. at Northwestern   Columbus, OH Chicago, IL (ORD) $118  San Diego at San Francisco   San Diego, CA San Francisco, CA $98  UCLA at Arizona St.   Los Angeles, CA Phoenix, AZ $68      Orange/Santa Ana, CA Phoenix, AZ $68      Burbank, CA Phoenix, AZ $68      Ontario, CA Phoenix, AZ $68      Long Beach, CA Phoenix, AZ $68  USC at Arizona   Los Angeles, CA Tucson, AZ $78      Orange/Santa Ana, CA Tucson, AZ $78      Burbank, CA Tucson, AZ $78      Ontario, CA Tucson, AZ $78      Long Beach, CA Tucson, AZ $78            Professional Golf   [IMAGE] Event   Departure City Destination City Fares PGA Tour: Nissan Open   Phoenix, AZ Los Angeles, CA $68      Phoenix, AZ Orange/Santa Ana, CA $68      Phoenix, AZ Burbank, CA $68      Phoenix, AZ Ontario, CA $68      Phoenix, AZ Long Beach, CA $68      Las Vegas, NV Los Angeles, CA $68      Las Vegas, NV Orange/Santa Ana, CA $68      Las Vegas, NV Burbank, CA $68      Las Vegas, NV Ontario, CA $68      Las Vegas, NV Long Beach, CA $68      St. Louis, MO Los Angeles, CA $178      St. Louis, MO Orange/Santa Ana, CA $178      St. Louis, MO Burbank, CA $178      St. Louis, MO Ontario, CA $178      St. Louis, MO Long Beach, CA $178      Minn/St. Paul, MN Los Angeles, CA $178      Minn/St. Paul, MN Orange/Santa Ana, CA $178      Minn/St. Paul, MN Burbank, CA $178      Minn/St. Paul, MN Ontario, CA $178      Minn/St. Paul, MN Long Beach, CA $178      Denver, CO Los Angeles, CA $178      Denver, CO Orange/Santa Ana, CA $178      Denver, CO Burbank, CA $178      Denver, CO Ontario, CA $178      Denver, CO Long Beach, CA $178            Cultural Events   [IMAGE] Event   Departure City Destination City Fares Concert: Billy Joel and   Dallas/Ft Worth, TX Philadelphia, PA $158  Elton John   Columbus, OH Philadelphia, PA $138      Chicago, IL (ORD) Philadelphia, PA $138    Surf'n Go Sports Terms and Conditions: Purchase Ticket By:  Friday, 2/15/02, 9:00pm PST Travel Outbound:  Saturday, 2/16/02 Travel Return:  Monday, 2/18/02 or Tuesday, 2/19/02 Travel On:  Flights operated by America West and America West Express Purchased Through:  americawest.com Ticket Refundability:  Non- refundable Itinerary Changes: Subject to fare availability, $100 change fee, and difference in fare if applicable Minimum Stay:  2 nights  Black Out Dates:  None Routing:  Roundtrip only, Routing restrictions may apply Other Discounts:  Not combinable with any other discount Seat Inventory:  Limited -  subject to availability Federal Excise Tax:  A $3 per flight segment Federal Excise Tax and a $2.50 per flight segment US Security Fee, up to a maximum of $10 per roundtrip, (begining 2/1/02) will be applied. A segment is defined as a take-off and landing Passenger Facility Charges:  Up to $20 per person, depending on itinerary           You have received this message because you subscribed to the  Surf'n Go messaging service at americawest.com.  To unsubscribe to this weekly mailing, please visit http://www.americawest.com/specials/sp_subscribe.asp .   This email was sent to: sscott5@enron.com


To all:

The current model is discounting the financial contracts improperly.  The financial contracts based on a contract month is being discounted an extra 50 days on average.   We are currently working on a process to correct the model by next month.

Please call me or Chris Abel if you have questions.

Thanks
Anita

---------------------- Forwarded by Anita Luong/HOU/ECT on 06/01/2001 02:50 PM ---------------------------

 	Anita Luong 06/01/2001 11:38 AM

To:	Sally Beck/Enron@EnronXGate, Scott Earnest/Enron@EnronXGate, Mark Fondren/Enron@EnronXGate, Gary Hickerson/Enron@EnronXGate, Georgeanne Hodges/Enron@EnronXGate, Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kori Loibl/Enron@EnronXGate, Mary Lynne Ruffer/HOU/EES@EES, Clara Carrington/Enron@EnronXGate, Frank Prejean/Enron@EnronXGate
cc:	Chris Abel/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject:	ERMS Discount Memo as of May 25, 2001

Attached is the ERMS Discounting Analysis as of May 25, 2001.

Please call Chris Abel at X33102 or Anita Luong at X-36753 if you have questions.

Thanks


I'm just about half done with the chart, so I thought I would share it with
you for comment.


I am good on the 25th

	"Grant Dorfman" <gdorfman@ogwb.com>
	06/29/2000 11:02 AM
	Please respond to "Grant Dorfman"

		 To: "Richard B. Sanders" <richard.b.sanders@enron.com>
		 cc: <bogden@ogwb.com>
		 Subject: Natole Turbine mediation

Plaintiffs are available to mediate on Aug. 25, and so is Mike  Miller.? I am
just waiting to hear back from IBC's lawyer on his client's  availability.
?
I assume that day is OK for you, as you had indicated that you  could do it
any day that week.? If so, I will send around a confirming  letter just as
soon as I hear back from IBC.
?
Grant Dorfman
713/844-3060


Kathy, Mr. Jeff Skilling has an Enron meeting on November 30 that will
prevent his participation in the Houston Mentor Network Breakfast.
Thank you,
Katherine Brown

Kathy Nethercutt <knethercutt@houstontech.org> on 11/17/2000 04:20:40 PM
To: Administrator <Administrator@houstontech.org>
cc:

Subject: Houston Mentor Network Breakfast Invitation

> The Houston Technology Center would like to invite you to attend the fifth
> meeting of the Houston Mentor Network on Thursday, November 30th.    We
> will introduce eight of our Candidate Companies. After the introductions,
> the Mentors and the Candidate Companies will be allowed time to network
> and to find appropriate "mentor connections."
>
 The breakfast will be held on Thursday November 30, 2000 at the
Briar Club, 2603 Timmons from  7:00 a.m. - 9:00 a.m.  Pre-registration and
pre-payment of $15.00 is required in advance (please note that no cash will
be accepted at the door).  Please complete the attached registration form
and return it via e-mail to Kathy Nethercutt @ knethercutt@houstontech.org
or you may fax it to 713/658-1744.

 <<reg form.doc>>
> AGENDA
>
> 7:00-7:30  Registration
> 7:30-8:30  Breakfast/Introduction to Candidate Companies
> 8:30-9:00  Wrap-up/Networking
>
> The companies that will be presenting are listed below:
>
>  * Knowledge Online - James Taylor
> *  Cushcity.com - Gwen Daye Richardson
> *  E-ceptionist - Dirk Voorhees
> *  Phat Chip - Rod Endo
> *  Lantel World Wide - Stephen Curry
> *  Megamania - George Bogle
> *  Biocyte - Jerry Cobb
> *  Rotary Steerable Tools - Steve McLoughlin
>
>
> I look forward to a great turnout!
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Juan F. Samudio
> Development Manager
 Houston Technology Center
 Phone:   713-658-1750

> For driving directions use this link: Yahoo! Driving Directions
> <<http://maps.yahoo.com/py/ddResults.py>>
>

 - reg form.doc


Car Rental Options for Enron Travelers

Rental car contracts for 2001 have been awarded to:

National Car Rental (Primary) and  Alamo Rent-A-Car (Secondary).

The intent of these agreements is to consolidate and leverage Enron's total car rental spend to achieve the most favorable rates and non-pricing provisions (i.e. insurance).

National Car Rental, due to its service levels, availability and total value proposition, has been awarded Primary status and is recommended as the first choice for Enron travelers' needs.

Alamo Rent-A-Car, a sister company to National, has been awarded a contract reflecting a Secondary status, due to its service levels, availability and low cost solutions.  Alamo is recommended as an alternative to National, where available.

When you rent a vehicle in the United States, (including Puerto Rico) or Canada, the following insurance provisions are included, regardless of rate selected:
1.	L/DW (Loss/Damage Waiver) - This is what is called Comprehensive or Collision on your personal auto. It covers the rental vehicle and pays for any damage to it.
2.	Liability - This covers people and property outside the rental vehicle. For both National and Alamo, the coverage is $100,000 per person, $300,000 per occurrence and $50,000 for property damage.
** IMPORTANT ***
These coverages apply regardless of rate selected, as long as the following contract ID is communicated at the time of reservation and rental is recorded on the transaction rental agreement.  (National -  5000838 Alamo    - #143974)
To enjoy the highest levels of service while renting a vehicle from Enron's preferred suppliers, it is recommended that each traveler enroll in National's and Alamo's preferred traveler programs.  National's Emerald Club membership and Alamo's Quicksilver program are designed to speed the transaction time by providing services such as counter bypass and rapid return.  The enrollment fees for these programs have been waived for Enron travelers.  Enrollment packets will be mailed to the addresses of Enron American Express T&E Cardholders.  You may also find an enrollment form on the Enron Travel Program intranet @ gss.enron.com <http://gss.enron.com/>.

If you have any questions or comments, please contact Jeff Leath at 713-646-6165.


Jeff,

I apologize for the delay.  I am still waiting on a few pieces to complete the very generic presentations we discussed this morning.  As soon as it is somewhat together I will shoot you a copy.

Regards,

Dave


Did you speak with your ECTRIC credit counterpart?  Who is it?  Did he make
this inquiry already?  One of you needs to speak wtih Total.  The "due
diligence" issue is a credit responsibility.  Please let us know how we can
help.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Brant Reves/ENRON@enronXgate
	04/17/2001 05:01 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank
Sayre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc: Adam Gross/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Total International Ltd.

Did we ever get any further on ECP issues related to ENA subs, i.e. ECTRIC
business with Total International Ltd, an unsupported subsidiary of TotalFina.

I have left two emails with my contact regarding ECP issues, with no reply.
What are our choices to do with trade v34062, a trade not yet confirmed with
this customer.  I don't see this as a credit issue, but more of a legal
issue.  From a credit standpoint, I am ok with the trade.

Adam - consider these guys on the No Trade list until we can finalize
handling status.

brant


I know Kevin forwarded you a map showing all the pipelines.  I have also been
working with Maria Salazar to get maps and more details.  The following
e-mail is the last that was sent on this issue.  I think most people like
Kevin's map for formatting, but it will need to be reviewed and maybe
corrected before it is used.  Maria's may be used to provide more individual
pipeline details.

I reviewed the latest draft with the management in ET&S marketing, and two
additional issues came up.  One is that ET&S would like a contact phone
number to appear very early in the screens when someone is clicking onto
Enron.com.  I know that you would eventually get the numbers on our
individual sites with contact numbers, but I think we want a phone number
much earlier....in the first few screens that would appear...maybe on the
overall GPG page.

The other issue is the ability to know the number of hits on different sites,
and to know how much time people spend at individual sites.  Will the site be
set up to track this type of info?  It would be very helpful from the
perspective of knowing how this site works for customers (i.e how long
customers spend on the site, and how "deep" customers go into the website).

Let me know!!!
Thanks.

---------------------- Forwarded by Jo Williams/ET&S/Enron on 05/22/2000
10:24 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Jo Williams                           05/22/2000 08:53 AM

To: Michael Eiben/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sharon
Farrell/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Scott
Coburn/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Richard Shepherd/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Beth
Jensen/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Martha Sumner-Kenney/NPNG/Enron@ENRON,
biaggio.mcphee@eott.com
cc: Maria Salazar/OTS/Enron@ENRON

Subject: More maps

Maria Salazar has sent me some more maps that show more details of individual
pipelines.   I like the details and formatting of the map that Kevin Hyatt
sent out...so I think that would be good to use for the main map (although
Maria pointed out that some of the pipeline details have not been updated).
The maps that are attached below could be used for the "drill down" from the
main map to the detailed maps (the customer would point and click on the
company they want and then get to a more specific map with greater detail on
the individual pipe).  What do you think?  What details do we want to show
for the drill down maps?

---------------------- Forwarded by Jo Williams/ET&S/Enron on 05/22/2000
08:39 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Maria Salazar                           05/19/2000 01:35 PM

To: Jo Williams/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: NNG AND TW

JO-
THIS IS A NNG MAP ON A COUNTY LEVEL ALSO IT SHOWS NBPL AND TRAILBLAZER. I
KNOW YOU SAID THAT COMPRESSORS ARE NOT NEEDE BUT BEFORE I START REMOING THEM
I WANTED TO KNOW WHAT YOU THINK. I COULD START SPLITTING UP THE STATES. CALL
ME 6.7156

THIS IS TW SYSTEM MAP


>From: "Keith Cartwright" <keith8@pdq.net>
>To: "Craig Taylor" <craig_taylor67@hotmail.com>
>Subject: The latest on the new Senator....
>Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 16:49:11 -0600
>
>FW: The latest on the new Senator....Click this link
>Go to:    http://d21c.com/pjmws/fun/Answer.gif
>
>(wait for a few seconds while it loads)
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


"ANNGTC" folder has been created in \\gthou-dv01\common\Marketing\ <file://\\gthou-dv01\common\Marketing\> with full access for users listed below.
Changes will take effect after reboot.
Nancy Bagot and Pat Shortridge are not ETS users, so I have sent a request to CORP-IRM to add them to the appropriate security group that I created for this folder. I will notify you once they get added to the group.
Thanks!


I will tell Steve to contact her as well. Thank you.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	James, Marlo C.
Sent:	Monday, September 10, 2001 2:37 PM
To:	Tholt, Jane M.
Cc:	Ellis, Laurie
Subject:	RE: West imbalance trades.xls

Colleen Rakiewicz is the contact that the settlements group deals with.  I will pass Steve's name on.

Thanks,
Marlo

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tholt, Jane M.
Sent:	Monday, September 10, 2001 2:34 PM
To:	James, Marlo C.
Subject:	RE: West imbalance trades.xls

Who are you talking to at Socal.  The deal was for July imbalance which was traded at the end of August.  Maybe they are confused.  Tell them to talk to Steve Baird.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	James, Marlo C.
Sent:	Monday, September 10, 2001 2:32 PM
To:	Smith, Matt; Tholt, Jane M.
Cc:	Sullivan, Patti; Anastas, Sherry; Ellis, Laurie; Valderrama, Lisa
Subject:	RE: West imbalance trades.xls

The imbalance trade for July 2001 is deal #1020741 and is to Southern California Gas Company for 320,000 mmbtu.  So. Cal. is saying they are only aware of a trade for August for 320,000 which matched deal #1019969 that is on the spreadsheet.  Did these 2 deals get put in correctly?

Please let me know.

Thanks,
Marlo James
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Smith, Matt
Sent:	Thursday, August 30, 2001 1:05 PM
To:	James, Marlo C.
Subject:	West imbalance trades.xls

Marlo,

These are the imbalance trades for the month of July.  Thanks.

Mat

 << File: West imbalance trades.xls >>


I believe this to be the applicable assignment language.  I'm confirming.

Kay


you better not loose this file again!!!   don't forget to change the
information on it already to ours!


Attached is PIRA's latest "Electricity Daily Demand Forecast."

If you have any questions regarding the report's content, please contact
Morris Greenberg (email: morris@pira.com) or Victoria Watkins (email:
vwatkins@pira.com), at (212) 686-6808.

Contact John Graziano regarding PIRA report distribution and address changes
at (212) 686-6808, email: support@pira.com.

NOTE: Circulation of the "Electricity Daily Demand Forecast" outside a
Client's licensed distribution area is strictly prohibited. Clients that are
unsure of their licensed distribution or require an extension of their
current license should contact their PIRA sales representative, or email to
sales@pira.com.

PIRA Energy Group

 - ed051001.pdf
 - ed051001.xls


On behalf of Greg Couch, please accept this invite to attend a meeting regarding Risk Trac/Source System Integration.  Each of you have been asked to participate (or provide a participant) in the task force to identify problems with data movement  from our "source systems" to Risk Trac. Greg has been given the responsibility of leading the task force.

If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Greg Couch at x36584.

Thank you.


Please send to Paul Addis at AEP, I lefft you a voicemail on Monday with his
number
Tel 614 223 1315
Fax 614 223 1331

I would also like to see a copy as it is going to be very difficult making
changes with 6 companies having to approve it..

What exactly are the changes?

Andy has my fax number

From: Mark Taylor on 05/16/2000 04:38 PM
To: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: What happened with the NDA?

If the NDA is the Confidentiality Agreement for the Energy Trading Platform
(group of six?), I have marked it up with only those revisions I thought
essential (having discussed them with Andy) and am now waiting to hear back
regarding where I should send it (have left voice mail for Greg and Andy is
checking).

If the NDA is something else, please let me know.

	Louise Kitchen
	05/16/2000 06:10 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: What happened with the NDA?


<<2R6KRED.DOC>>  <<2RSWRED.DOC>>

Kay and George:

Enclosed are final drafts of the LLC Agreements marked to reflect revisions
from the drafts circulated January 11, 2001.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - 2R6KRED.DOC
 - 2RSWRED.DOC


Steve,

FYI, Kim.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hyatt, Kevin
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 8:30 AM
To:	Watson, Kimberly
Cc:	Geaccone, Tracy
Subject:	RE: Oasis Dairy Farms Judgement - update

According to Bonnie White, the time period for Oasis to appeal ends on Friday 11/2.  If there is no appeal, then Enron will file a writ of execution with the local sherriff who will go out to the business and seize property in an amount to satisfy the judgement.  This is cheaper than hiring a collection agency and we retain more of the funds.  Let me know if you have questions.
kh

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Watson, Kimberly
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 10:54 AM
To:	Hyatt, Kevin
Subject:	FW: Oasis Dairy Farms Judgement

Kevin,

Who in legal have you been working with?  Tracy was wondering when we thought we would receive the money.

Thanks, Kim.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Geaccone, Tracy
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 10:34 AM
To:	Watson, Kimberly
Subject:	RE: Oasis Dairy Farms Judgement

Any idea when or if we will receive the money?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Watson, Kimberly
Sent:	Sunday, October 21, 2001 3:33 PM
To:	Moore, Jan; Geaccone, Tracy
Subject:	FW: Oasis Dairy Farms Judgement

FYI, Kim.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hyatt, Kevin
Sent:	Wednesday, October 10, 2001 9:54 AM
To:	Moseley, Debbie; Watson, Kimberly; Cherry, Paul
Cc:	Gadd, Eric; Harris, Steven
Subject:	Oasis Dairy Farms Judgement

Earlier this year I requested that the Enron litigation unit file suit against Oasis Dairy for collection of unpaid transport bills on TW.  The suit was filed in the fifth judicial district court in Chaves County, NM.

On October 1, 2001, TW was granted summary judgement in the case by the court in the amount of $29,250.56 inclusive of back interest and attorney fees.  This amount will continue to accrue interest at 8.75% per annum until paid by Oasis.

If you would like a copy of the judgement, please let me know.

kh


IntercontinentalExchange
Firm Physical Natural Gas Price Bulletin
For Natural Gas Delivered on Wednesday, November 21, 2001
(Trade Date of Tuesday, November 20, 2001)
Click here to access index history.
* volume represents sell-side only *
 Region     Hub 	 High 	 Low 	 Wtd Avg Index 	 Change ($) 	 Vol (mmBtu) 	 Hub Name
  LOUISIANA
     ANR SE 	 $2.7900 	 $2.1000 	 $2.6126 	 +.5901 	 222,600 	 American Natural Resources Pipeline Co. - SE Transmission Pool
     Columbia Onshore 	 $2.7450 	 $2.1500 	 $2.5128 	 +.3097 	 305,200 	 Columbia Gulf Transmission Co. - Onshore Pool
     Henry Hub 	 $2.8200 	 $2.2200 	 $2.6180 	 +.5406 	 1,538,500 	 Henry Hub tailgate - Louisiana
     NGPL LA 	 $2.7400 	 $2.0550 	 $2.5180 	 +.5460 	 287,900 	 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America, Louisiana Pool
     Tenn 500L 	 $2.7400 	 $2.2800 	 $2.5295 	 +.4989 	 275,100 	 Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.-Zone L, 500 Leg Pool
     Tenn 800L 	 $2.7300 	 $2.2450 	 $2.4840 	 +.4767 	 248,800 	 Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.-Zone L, 800 Leg Pool
     TETCO ELA 	 $2.7900 	 $2.2500 	 $2.5993 	 +.4619 	 164,900 	 Texas Eastern - East LA
     TETCO WLA 	 $2.7700 	 $2.3300 	 $2.5976 	 +.6778 	 208,300 	 Texas Eastern - West LA
     Transco 65 	 $2.8200 	 $2.3000 	 $2.6756 	 +.5535 	 176,100 	 Transco - Station 65
     Trunkline ELA 	 $2.7600 	 $2.0000 	 $2.5481 	 +.5686 	 82,500 	 Trunkline Gas Company - East Louisiana Pool
     TxGas SL 	 $2.8400 	 $2.2800 	 $2.6244 	 +.5326 	 245,000 	 Texas Gas Transmission Corp.-Zone SL FT Pool
  MIDCONTINENT
     MichCon, citygate 	 $2.9000 	 $2.2500 	 $2.8052 	 +.6308 	 219,800 	 Michigan Consolidated
     NGPL Midcont 	 $2.5900 	 $2.2300 	 $2.4805 	 +.6875 	 221,700 	 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America, Mid-Continent Pool
     NGPL Nicor, citygate 	 $2.7975 	 $2.1300 	 $2.6082 	 +.5992 	 1,231,800 	 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America, Nicor Citygate
     NGPL NIPSCO, citygate 	 $2.8000 	 $2.5400 	 $2.7380 	 +.7435 	 107,500 	 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America, Nipsco Citygate
     NNG Demarcation 	 $2.7000 	 $2.1250 	 $2.4831 	 +.4382 	 214,200 	 Northern Natural Gas, Demarcation Pool
  NORTHEAST
     Columbia TCO 	 $2.9100 	 $2.2900 	 $2.7287 	 +.5870 	 533,300 	 Columbia Gas Co. - TCO Pool
     Dominion So.Point 	 $3.1000 	 $2.7800 	 $2.8973 	 +.5502 	 235,300 	 Dominion - South Point
     TETCO M3 	 $3.3100 	 $2.8000 	 $3.0520 	 +.5224 	 218,400 	 Texas Eastern - M3 Zone
     Transco Z-6 (NY) 	 $3.4100 	 $2.9000 	 $3.2445 	 +.6188 	 100,000 	 Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. - Zone 6 (NY)
  WEST
     El Paso non-Bondad 	 $2.4500 	 $2.1600 	 $2.3522 	 +.6445 	 183,900 	 El Paso - San Juan Basin, Blanco Pool
     Huntingdon/Sumas 	 $2.4500 	 $2.3200 	 $2.3958 	 +.5708 	 126,000 	 Westcoast Energy & Northwest Pipeline Corp.
     Opal 	 $2.4100 	 $1.9600 	 $2.2514 	 +.6931 	 109,800 	 Opal
     PG&E Citygate 	 $2.6500 	 $2.3800 	 $2.5525 	 +.5769 	 227,500 	 PG&E - Citygate
     SoCal Border 	 $2.7200 	 $2.4000 	 $2.5593 	 +.6743 	 208,000 	 Southern California Border Points (Ehrenberg,Topock,Needles)
  WEST TEXAS
     El Paso - Keystone 	 $2.5300 	 $2.3700 	 $2.4526 	 +.7034 	 606,000 	 El Paso - Keystone Pool
     Waha 	 $2.5700 	 $2.3800 	 $2.5118 	 +.6383 	 245,300 	 Waha Hub - West Texas

Includes all firm physical fixed price trades done from 7 AM to 11:30 AM Central Prevailing Time on the trade date specified for natural gas delivered on the specified date(s).
IntercontinentalExchange is the world's most liquid trading platform for over-the-counter energy and metals.  Active markets include North American power and natural gas, global crude and refined oil products, and precious metals.  Traded instruments include forwards, swaps, and options.
In order to receive the proprietary information contained in this email, you acknowledge and agree that you shall not further disseminate the IntercontinentalExchange Market Data contained herein to any person or entity without the express written consent of IntercontinentalExchange.   Furthermore, you acknowledge that (1) IntercontinentalExchange has exclusive and valuable property rights in this data; (2) IntercontinentalExchange's data is being made available to you only for your own business or personal activities; and (3) you cannot communicate the data, in any form, to any other person or entity without the express written consent of IntercontinentalExchange.
This data is provided to you free of charge.  IntercontinentalExchange reserves the right to cancel this service at any time for any reason or no reason at all.
You agree that IntercontinentalExchange does not make any representations or warranties, express or implied, with respect to the data.
To become an Exchange Participant or inquire about the indices, please contact sales@intcx.com.
To unsubscribe from this service, click here unsubscribe.
?Copyright IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. 2001, All Rights Reserved.


Start Date: 1/9/02; HourAhead hour: 6;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002010906.txt


We are proud to announce another outstanding product for your consideration. MidNiteMail.com is dedicated to bringing you the best bargains, deals, new ideas, and offers that save you both time and money. Our research team strives to bring you offers that you may otherwise have missed. We are leaders in the permission based email marketing arena and we want your experience with MidNiteMail to be as positive and rewarding as possible. We think that you will find our our periodic emails both informative and exciting. However, your privacy is very important to us. You registered to receive our emails at MidNiteMail.com or by subscribing through one of our marketing partners. If for any reason you do not wish to receive our emails please click here  and you will be removed within 3 business days.

Free Cell Phone From Paragon Cellular[IMAGE]


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"Kenneth G Gruhl" <kggruhl@duke-energy.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Kenneth+20G+20Gruhl+22+20+3Ckggruhl+40duke-energy+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Sunday, September 23, 2001 6:28 PM
To:	Mulligan, Amy; Allen K Nielsen; blreese@duke-energy.com; Beck Mayberry; wralkema@pplmt.com; Christopher S Smart; dacluff@duke-energy.com; dlsmith@pplweb.com; dtedesco@duke-energy.com; Schoolcraft, Darrell; Darren Stephens; David Bowers; David P Pell; George X Ouzounian; jjbischoff@pplweb.com; jmtaggart@duke-energy.com; jpritchard@citlink.net; James Stebbins; kglenny@duke-energy.com; Kim White; mschneider@duke-energy.com; Michael Kerr; Michael Wells; rjnewson@duke-energy.com; rspear@pplmt.com; Sherry Davis; Steven Fliflet; Steven Fliflet; Ted Romo; Todd Hendricks; Tom Carlson; Tyler J Kristensen; ajreiter@duke-energy.com; kggruhl@duke-energy.com; pattersondw@bv.com; swansondj@bv.com; trading@pplmt.com
Subject:	Griffith Gas & Electric Estimate - Monday Sept. 24, HE 8:00 to Tuesday Sept. 25, HE 7:00

Notes:
1)  After testing is completed for the day, we are showing Both Units
Chilled but Unfired at a base condition of 463 MW.
DETM can schedule more or less than the 463 MW in Real Time, depending on
the market and gas control agreement.
2) OK to shut off one CT rather than operate both at reduced load.

(Embedded image moved to file: pic04966.pcx)
 - pic04966.pcx


Start Date: 10/27/01; HourAhead hour: 20;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001102720.txt

Error retrieving HourAhead price data - process continuing...
---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 20 / Preferred:   0.00 / Final:   0.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 10/27/01
  TIE_POINT: FCORNR_5_PSUEDO
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_PAC
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM


Sara,

The point person in London has been Derek Lee.

He is here in Houston right now, and will be for the remainder of the week.

I would love it if we could coordinate both entities as one negotiation.

Perhaps you and derek should compare notes?

FYI - Ted Leh has sent a message to Jeff Kinneman that he is working with you
on the docs.  Thanks,  that should ease management's mind somewhat as to
continuing progress.

Thanks,

Tom

From: Sara Shackleton@ECT on 04/16/2001 03:54 PM
To: Tom Doukas/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Enron Credit Inc. ("ECI")

Tom:

I forwarded a copy of the ECI unanimous consent to Goldman to see if they
will accept "as is".  I have not heard back.  Goldman legal will email repo
docs.

Regarding Enron Credit Limited ("ECL"), I spoke with Goldman commercial and
understand that someone (don't know who) from London ECL contacted Goldman
inquiring about repos.  I'm happy to facilitate with contacts, etc. so please
let me know.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Tom Doukas@ENRON
	04/16/2001 01:29 PM

		 To: Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Enron Credit Inc. ("ECI")

Whenever you decide whether the UCD for ECI is sufficient or not please let
me know urgently.  Management in London has some aggressive expectations for
a deliverable on repos.  We will have to push back on them if the UCD has to
be redrafted.

I would very much like to give management a clear status and a realistic
time-frame for when we can expect to have the repo capacity in place.

I do recognize the time frame is highly dependent on what the current
situation actually is.  Therefore I am hopeful we can answer the below
questions sooner than later.

If I can provide any help in anyway please let me know.

Tom,

04/16/2001 12:16 PM
Cheryl Nelson
Cheryl Nelson
Cheryl Nelson
04/16/2001 12:16 PM
04/16/2001 12:16 PM
Sent by: Cheryl Nelson
To: Tom Doukas/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Enron Credit Inc. ("ECI")

Sara, I do not agree with the view that we cannot use the existing
resolutions for repos.  Please call me at your convenience so that we can
discuss.

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693

	Tom Doukas
	04/16/2001 08:55 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Enron Credit Inc. ("ECI")

I am assuming that you are saying that if repos go through the Prime Broker
accounts it is a problem.  The poblem being that the current brokerage
agreements for ECI do not provide for repos.  Is my assumption correct?

Is our UCD adequate as is for repos?

What is our existing format that you mention below?

Are you able to pursue this with Goldman right now today?

Thanks,

Tom

From: Sara Shackleton@ECT on 04/16/2001 08:36 AM
To: Tom Doukas/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Enron Credit Inc. ("ECI")

Tom:

I am not certain that the existing resolution permits repurchase and reverse
repurchase transactions and securities lending, bonds borrow pledge, etc. as
the brokerage consent was not written to accommodate these types of
transactions.  However, if the repo party will accept our existing format,
then we need not worry.  I'll call Ted Leh and try to find the proper Goldman
person.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Tom Doukas@ENRON
	04/16/2001 08:10 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron, David A Wall/Risk Mgmt/LON/ECT@ECT, Greg
Hedger/LON/ECT@ECT, Reza Rezaeian/EU/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Re: Enron Credit Inc. ("ECI")

Sara,

Can you please provide your findings on the following items:

1. Determine with Cheryl that ECI is in fact authorized to transact Repos

2. How robust the Goldman Repo agreements are, and their sutability to ECI.

3. An estimate on how long it will take to set up the Goldman Repo Agreements
in ECI's name.

Can you please also provide any ideas how ECI or ECL could transact a Repo
trade today using existing documentation.

London has indicated an urgent need to carry out these transactions.

Thanks,

Tom


Enron Methanol nominates the following natural gas requirements for the
Methanol Plant for December 2000:

33,000 mmbtu per day

EGPFC nominates the following natural gas requirements for the MTBE Plant at
Morgan's Point for December 2000:

12,000 mmbtu per day for the first 15 days of the month.  None for the last
half of the month.  MTBE plant will be down after December 15.


We have scheduled a  Telephonic Board of Directors meeting as follows:

Wednesday,  November 7, 2001

8:00 a.m. to  9:00 a.m. CDT (Houston time)

If participating  from an International location or on Compaq campus:
Dial:  303-633-6171

All others  participants:

Dial:   800-223-4834

Pass code for  both numbers: 5810821#

Thanks,
Annette  Ambriz
Executive Assistant to Linda  Auwers
Corporate Law Group
phone:   281-518-6178
fax:      281-518-6807annette.ambriz@compaq.com


These have been approved and auto-scheduled.

Kate

Lester Rawson
03/23/2001 08:23 AM
To: Heather Dunton/PDX/ECT@ECT, Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Samantha
Law/PDX/ECT@ECT, Fran Chang/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Feb. Services Annuities

Kate,

Please approve and autoschedule these annuities. They are all on 2/28/01 for
He 1.

558879 Saguaro
558057 Lv Cogen
556970 Willamette

These Annuities show EPMI Services profit charged to these counterparties for
Feb.

Les Rawson


&Who Wants to Help Millions?8 is our theme for Enron,s 2000 Houston United
Way campaign, which officially kicks off on August 9, 2000.  Last year, Enron
achieved a 17 percent increase overour 1998 campaign.  This success would not
have been possible without the support of all levels of management.

Enron,s Executive Solicitation begins today, and we are counting on your
leadership and strong support this year.  Your generous contribution will
enable United Way agencies in our community to continue providing quality
programs and services.

Our goal this year is $2,310,000 ) a challenging goal, but we believe it is
achievable with your help.  Including the dollar for dollar corporate match,
Enron,s total pledge to United Way in 2000 will be more than $4.5 million.
To get there, we invite you to &Help Millions8 by making your pledge in one
of the following way:

? Alexis de Tocqueville Society (Gifts of $10,000 or more) ) Every member of
Enron,s Executive Committee is a member of this elite group.  Last year,
Enron was Houston,s leader with 39 members and ranked in the top 25
nationally.  Members are recognized at a dinner hosted by the United Way.

? Chairman,s Club ) The giving levels in this United Way group are:
? Diamond ) $7,500 - $9,999
? Platinum ) $5,000 - $7,499
? Gold ) $2,500 - $4,999
? Silver ) $1,500 - $2,499
? Bronze ) $1,000 - $1,499

By pledging 1.2 percent or more of your annual base salary of $90,000 or
more, you also will qualify as a member of Enron,s &Make a Difference Club.8

An exciting edition to our campaign this year is that we have implemented an
electronic pledging system.  Please click on the United Way link,
http://unitedway.enron.com to learn more about this year,s campaign and make
your contribution.  You will find that it is a very easy process and only
takes a few moments to complete.  Please make your electronic pledge no later
than Monday, August 7.  If you have any questions at all regarding the
campaign or the new e-pledging, please contact Kathy Mayfield, Campaign
Coordinator at 713-853-3264.

Last year, Enron,s executive team pledged a total of $2.9 million, including
the corporate match, which accounted for approximately 66 percent of the
total Enron dollars pledged.  Enron also ranked among the highest in per
capita giving for large companies for the 10th straight year. This is a
tremendous achievement, and you played a significant role in making it a
reality.  Let,s continue the momentum in 2000.

Together we will make a positive difference in the lives of many people in
need in our community as we all join in &Who Wants to Help Millions?8.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 05/07/2001
03:28 PM ---------------------------

ERisk <eRisks_news@email.eRisks.com> on 05/04/2001 11:30:41 AM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: ERisk Essentials

ERISK ESSENTIALS --
What's New at ERisk.com, 4 May 2001

****************************************************
This week’s Essentials is brought to you by ERisk Analytics 1.0, the
first executive information system dedicated to strategic capital management.
Learn more about this comprehensive new software solution and how it delivers
enterprise risk management analytics that effectively link risk, capital and
shareholder value.
http://www.erisk.com/about/PressRoom/releases/about_pressreleases_043001.asp
****************************************************

WEEKLY REVIEW
http://www.erisk.com/news/weekly/news_weekly2001-05-04_01.asp
This week's economic, banking and P&C insurance news, from an enterprise risk
management perspective. Featuring exclusive coverage of this week’s
RIMS conference in Atlanta.

ANALYSIS
http://www.erisk.com/news/news_analyses.asp
? Who matters most - stakeholders or shareholders?
? Risk managers neglect overseas operations at their peril.
? Mobile banking is on the way - but will banks benefit from it?

BASLE RESOURCES
http://www.erisk.com/news/news_basle.asp
Now you can find all ERisk’s comprehensive coverage of the Basle II
proposals on bank capital adequacy in one place:
www.erisk.com/news/news_basle.asp. You’ll find all our recent coverage,
including features, event transcripts, news stories, interviews and analysis
along with links to other resources, regulatory summaries and rating agency
and industry association responses.

BASLE SPECIAL
http://www.erisk.com/news/news_features.asp
Continuing our special coverage of the proposed new regulatory capital rules,
we look at Basle’s approach to operational risk. Rob Jameson explores
the proposals to set a regulatory capital charge for op risk, and canvasses
industry opinion on how they might work in practice.

VIEWPOINT
http://www.erisk.com/news/news_viewpoint.asp
In this special Q&A, Ashish Dev of KeyBank talks to ERisk about what his bank
has discovered so far from its internal testing on the impact of the new
Basle proposals. It’s too early to say for sure, but many banks may not
find much reason to improve their risk management practices. You can find out
Dev's perspective on the Basle proposal in our iConference archive.

ERisk PRODUCT CATALOGUE
http://www.erisk.com/store/store_product.asp
ERisk’s comprehensive Product Catalogue is a one-stop shop giving full
details of the systems and services available to risk managers. From
Algorithmics to Zai*Net, we list the major software vendors, data providers
and consultancy firms; as well as details of where to find risk management
magazines, research reports, web glossaries, training courses and
certification programmes.

*****************************************************************
ERisk’s editorial team is always looking for opinions, article ideas or
anything else you think our 18,000+ users would find interesting. We welcome
your comments and suggestions

*****************************************************************

The ERisk Essentials is published every Friday by ERisk.com

To subscribe, please register on our website.
http://www.erisk.com/util/register.asp

To unsubscribe, access your account. Your username is the email address where
you received this message.
http://www.erisk.com/util/account.asp

To be reminded of your password, or reset it:
http://www.erisk.com/util/forgot_pwd.asp


excellent

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kean, Steven J.
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 1:25 PM
To:	Denne, Karen
Cc:	Palmer, Mark A. (PR)
Subject:

Voicemail from Ken?

 << File: 102401vcml.doc >>


You shouldn't have told Ben.

	From:  Kathleen Carnahan                           03/29/2001 04:57 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T
Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ann Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carlos
Sole/NA/Enron@Enron, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lorie Leigh/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: My schedule

I will be out of the office tomorrow and Monday.  I can be reached at home
(281) 363-1477 on Monday.

Kathleen


Mark,

Hello!   An interesting case below re: Market Quotation/Loss......

J
---------------------- Forwarded by Justin Boyd/LON/ECT on 19/06/2000 11:22
---------------------------

Edmund Cooper
14/06/2000 11:52
To: ECT London European Trading
cc:

Subject: ISDA - Payments on Early Termination

Attached, for your information, a bulletin from Allen & Overy summarizing the
the recent Peregrine judgment (and the judicial treatment of Payments on
Early Termination). Provides for some interesting reading.

Regards, Edmund

 - MK005031.pdf


Julie,

Just wanted to check and see if you had received my last two emails.  If so,
I'd love to know what you think about the whole situation.  If not, let me
know and I will resend the emails.

Susan


Scott,

Thanks for the help with Dave Duran.  He wants to offer me a job, and he sent me to talk to Louise Kitchen today, which I did.  She told me that she wanted to check my references.  I was wondering if you would be willing to drop her a note on me.  She would probably put a lot more stock in your view than in most of the other guys I have worked with in EI and EBS.  Thanks, I appreciate it.

Steve


Start Date: 10/17/01; HourAhead hour: 9;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001101709.txt
!!!General SQL error.
Couldn't update; currently locked.
Table
!!!A user transaction is already in progress.
!!!A user transaction is already in progress.
!!!A user transaction is already in progress.
!!!A user transaction is already in progress.
!!!A user transaction is already in progress.
!!!A user transaction is already in progress.
!!!A user transaction is already in progress.
!!!A user transaction is already in progress.
!!!A user transaction is already in progress.
!!!A user transaction is already in progress.
!!!A user transaction is already in progress.
!!!A user transaction is already in progress.
!!!A user transaction is already in progress.
!!!A user transaction is already in progress.
!!!A user transaction is already in progress.
!!!A user transaction is already in progress.
!!!A user transaction is already in progress.


Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Monday, July 02, 2001 5:58 PM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.
Cc:	Lavorato, John
Subject:	Turbines

I spoke to Mark Taylor, there is no legal restriction (eg any trademark issue)  on selling any turbines including putting all the names (ie specifically calling them GE 7FAs).  We did look at this once before but not with GE turbines.


Hi Gregg,

Per your request:

See ya,

Kay

From: Gregg Penman on 10/20/2000 03:08 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Waiver

Kay - please review this letter and let me know if you think it needs any
edits.

Gregg
----- Forwarded by Gregg Penman/Corp/Enron on 10/20/2000 03:08 PM -----

	Mary Lynne Ruffer@ECT
	10/20/2000 01:00 PM

		 To: Gregg Penman/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Tracey Irvin/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Waiver

Per our discussion...

Thanks!


I would like to have a chance to read it, which I haven't.  I still finishing
up the Intergen docs.

The reason we were using a summary is that we don't know how GE is going to
react, which might result in some changes to the contract.  In the case of
the LM's we had already agreed with GE concerning the terms applicable to the
equipment after assignment.

Kay

	From:  Ben F Jacoby @ ECT                           01/10/2001 10:42 AM

Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: f_mitro@hotmail.com

Subject: Prototype Letter Agreement

Kay:

Is there any reason we would attach a summary of the master 7EA facility
agreement rather than a redacted copy? Other than that, it looks good to me.
Are you OK with us sending this out?

Also, it would be helpful to have all exhibits to send with the letter (i.e.,
LLC Agreement, Facility Agreement summary, escrow agreement, etc.) Please let
me know the status of these.

Thanks,

Ben
---------------------- Forwarded by Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT on 01/10/2001 09:28 AM
---------------------------
From: Suzanne Adams on 01/09/2001 02:54 PM
To: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Prototype Letter Agreement

I'm forwarding this per Kay's request.
----- Forwarded by Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT on 01/09/2001 02:53 PM -----

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 01/08/2001 05:18:16 PM
To: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com>

Subject: Prototype Letter Agreement

 <<2rz503!.DOC>>  <<2RZ5RED.DOC>>  <<2R6LRED.DOC>>

Kay:

Enclosed is a revised draft of the proposed letter agreement for the 7EA
turbines reflecting Ben's business points and the matters discussed in our
telephone conference earlier today.  Also enclosed is a blacklined copy
reflecting revisions from the December 15, 2000 draft of the prototype
letter agreement.  Although we have enclosed a blacklined draft reflecting
revisions from the final draft of the CA/ED-I letter agreement, this is
difficult to read due to our re-arrangement of the reps and warranties.  If
you have any questions or comments, please advise.  (I have received the
courier package with the GE Facility Agreements).

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

Enclosures: 129569v3
  129569vR3/2
  129569v3 R 128541v18

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - 2rz503!.DOC
 - 2RZ5RED.DOC
 - 2R6LRED.DOC


FYI and further to my vmail this afternoon -- Here are 3 proposals that
Fairley sent to Reliant last week.  It's very likely that at least one of
these will be concluded this week (Joe Wagner warned me just now that our
prices are very close).
Regards,
Janice

EB3861
Assistant General Counsel, Enron North America Corp.
713-853-1794 (Fax:  713-646-4842)
----- Forwarded by Janice R Moore/HOU/ECT on 12/12/2000 04:19 PM -----

	David Fairley
	12/05/2000 07:45 PM

		 To: Rolando_SanzGuerrero@reliantenergy.com
		 cc: (bcc: Janice R Moore/HOU/ECT)
		 Subject: 3 Proposals

Rolando -- Attached are the three proposals that we discussed for your review.

Daily Winter Call

Daily Summer Call

2002 Extendable

Please look them over, and give me a call to discuss.

Thanks -- David


after 3:30 today for about 10 min

fletch

-----Original Message-----
From: Giron, Gustavo
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 6:30 PM
To: Sturm, Fletcher J.
Cc: Jenkins IV, Daniel
Subject: Mili arms production driving p demand up in MW?

Fletch
As you proposed, Daniel and me are exploring the subject above. So, you'd like to briefly talk to you about this.
If convenient, please let us know most convenient time.

Gus
East Power Fundamental Analysis


Turns out my boss is going to get to Teala's at @ 5:00.  So if you want to
show up earlier, say 6:00/6:30, I'm sure that would be cool.  I know Ben,
Nick and possibly Sunil are planning on going so you may want to see when
they are planning on getting there.


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 10/03/2000 05:02 PM -----

	Bradley Diebner
	10/03/2000 05:00 PM

		 To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R
Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary G
Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron Europe Global Contracts and Facilities, Enron
Europe Global CounterParty, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bradley
Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Adnan Patel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL Credit Responses 10/03/00

The EOL approvals for 10/03/00 are attached below.

Regards,
bd


In office all week.

	Joseph Alamo
	01/22/2001 07:53 PM

		 To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron, Marcie Milner/Corp/Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: SECOND Request for Weekly Schedules - Jan 22-26, 2001

Please note previous e-mail for said request.  [Note to Marcie:  sorry! I see
I inadvertently omitted you from the
first e-mail! Mea culpa!)
---------------------- Forwarded by Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron on 01/22/2001 05:47
PM ---------------------------

Joseph Alamo
01/18/2001 02:25 PM
To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron,
Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron
cc: Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT

Subject: Request for Weekly Schedules - Jan 22-26, 2001

Please forward your *anticipated* schedules for next week to me, as soon as
possible.

Thanks in advance for your assistance.

Joseph Alamo
Sr. Administrative Assistant
Government Affairs - The Americas
San Francisco CA


Steve/Rick  -- Here is the E-mail from EPSA group preparing training for FERC
persons that I mentioned during our conference call.  Since FERCers  tell me
they know Enron's position, and ask what are others' concerns -- this
approach has proven successful in the past.    I believe this is consistent
with what we discussed this morning.  The next group meeting is May 1.
Suggestions are appreciated.  Call if you have questions.  202.466.9150.

"Tomcala, Karen" <Karen.Tomcala@pge-corp.com> on 04/24/2000 02:43:32 PM
To: "'jhartso@enron.com'" <jhartso@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: FW: Energy Business Coalition -- Training module descriptions for
FERC

Joe:  As discussed.  Hope you can join us.  If not, can you please give me a
buzz so that we don't sit around waiting for you?  Thanks.  KAT

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tomcala, Karen
> Sent: Monday, April 24, 2000 3:30 PM
> To: 'larry.bruneel@wepco.com'; 'mado@dynegy.com'; 'loomis@neesnet.com';
> 'jsimon@epsa.org'; 'starckle@sce.com'
> Subject: Energy Business Coalition -- Training module descriptions
> for FERC
>
> REMINDER:  Our next meeting is tomorrow at 2:00 PM in the PG&E office.
> Attached is a revised summary of our proposed training modules.  (Thank
> you to Mary and Larry for the scenarios.)  This draft, once finalized, is
> what we will send to FERC for their consideration.  I've typed in some
> questions I have about this draft.  I'd like for us to give this draft a
> careful editing review.  See you tomorrow!  KAT
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> _________________
>
> MODULE 1 -- Energy Business Basics  [Will the word "basics" imply a
> beginner level presentation and attract lower level staff?  Alternative:
> Energy Business Decision-making or Conducting Business in a Competitive
> Energy Market]
>
> Purpose:  This module will provide an understanding of a business day in
> the energy market from the perspectives of different types of market
> participants.
>
> Section 1:  NYMEX will open with a general presentation on properly
> functioning markets.  Various market participants (e.g., a power marketer,
> an independent energy producer, a generation-only IOU, a
> transmission/distribution-only IOU, an industrial customer) will follow
> with short presentations on their own experiences in conducting business
> in the competitive market.  Topics addressed will include:
>
> * How markets mature and function
> * How prices are set and efficient, low-cost options are identified
> * Comparison between "organized" markets and freely formed markets
> * Distinguishing market signals, market design flaws, and competitive
> failures
> * Dealing with the mechanics (ATC/TTC, TLRs, scheduling and dispatch,
> varying business practices)
> * Roles for, and relationship between, RTOs and PXs
> * Market monitoring and sanctions
>
> Section 2:  Attendees will be given the opportunity to interact and make
> business decisions as specific market participants under defined
> circumstances.  The scenario presented will be a peak day in June, with
> higher than normal temperatures, across a region that includes ISOs and
> non-ISOs [RTOs?].  Attendees will be assigned to one of a number of roles:
> transmission owner within an ISO with LMP, generator with peaking
> facilities in an ISO and also in regions without an ISO, marketer selling
> power to customers in regions with an ISO and in regions without an ISO,
> same marketer selling natural gas to peaking facilities [too
> complicated?], utility serving native load in a non-ISO region, industrial
> customer buying interruptible load.
>
> Section 3:  (Optional)  Attendees will be given a tour of the PG&E trading
> floor in Bethesda.
>
>
> MODULE 2 --  Generation and Transmission Planning Issues
>
> Purpose:  This module would take a longer-term perspective of the needs
> of, and participation in, energy markets.
>
> Section 1:  Presentations by a range of market participants will address
> topics such as:
>
> * Comparison of the natural monopoly v. competitive models for
> transmission expansion
> * Roles for, and relationships among, RTOs, TOs and other market
> participants
> * Federal/state interaction and siting difficulties
> * Role of non-wires alternatives
> * Market signals and incentives
> * Predictability, prioritization, and comparability
> * Timing requirements
>
> Section 2:  A continuation of the Module 1 scenario will provide an
> interactive opportunity for attendees.  From the perspective of various
> market participants, attendees will look back at the events of the model
> peak day and answer questions such as:  what signals did the market send;
> what is needed for the market to work more efficiently; what is likely to
> get built; and what are the impediments to getting the needed facilities
> built?


Hardie Davis and I plan to join Sunday's Audit Comm. and BoD meeting by phone.  Will you be here physically or via phone?  I am just looking for a human being from the Company who might be here in case other humans decide to come to the building as well!   We have reserved 50M03 for people attending in person.

Laura Valencia and Mary Martinez will be here for any administrative needs, and Laura will start the call and be on the communications line.  I will have a second line and be able to communicate directly with her if necessary.

I do not yet know if Ken plans to be in the building or not.  Please drop me a note with your plans.

Rick - Do you have a preference for the AA guys?  Also, have you considered an executive session at the start or at the end of the call for any matters the Audit Comm. might want to address in that forum?  We could keep the third-party folks on "music hold" if you choose to have an exec. session.

Jim - I am trying to be out of the office next Mon. - Wed..  Hardie will be here and I will be very accessible.  Let me know if you have any concerns about that, but I think I can manage the activities from afar for a few days.

Thank you.


This may be a good idea, but lets not forget that BP is the entity formerly
known as "BP Amoco" which, if I'm not mistaken, is the home of Jeff
Hooligan.  That guy sees evil in every pipeline deal,a nd may not have even
known that his commercial people were doing deals with TW.  I'd like to think
that the commercial people at BP have more clout than Hooligan and Kathy
Edwards, but I wouldn't bet the ranch on that.  df

From: Maria Pavlou/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/29/2001 04:19 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ENRON@enronXgate, TK
Lohman/ENRON@enronxgate
cc: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: TW's negotiated rate deals

I'm assuming that BP Energy which is part of Indicated Shippers' Protest is
the same BP Energy which entered into a negotiated rate transaction with TW
for March.  Is it worth it to give their business person a call and see if
they can get Kathie to withdraw the protest?  Let's discuss if you think we
might get somewhere with them.  Thanks, maria


Notice No. 00-421
December 12, 2000

MEMORANDUM

TO:  ALL NYMEX AND COMEX MEMBERS

FROM:  Neal L. Wolkoff
  Executive Vice President

DATE:  December 12, 2000

RE:  Reminder of Price Fluctuation Limits Applicable to Trading on NYMEX
ACCESS

The purpose of this Notice is to remind Members and Member Firms that an
Executive Committee Resolution that was ratified by the Board of Directors
and that concerns Exchange price fluctuation limit rules as those rules apply
to trading on NYMEX ACCESS (Resolution), remains in effect and will
continue until February 1, 2001, unless Members are notified otherwise by the
Exchange.

As background, on October 6, 2000, the Exchange issued a Notice to Members
(#347), advising Members and Member Firms that the CFTC had approved this
Resolution.  The Resolution, which became effective with the commencement of
the NYMEX ACCESS session on Sunday, October 8, 2000, has amended on a
temporary basis a number of Exchange price fluctuation limit rules as those
rules apply to trading on NYMEX ACCESS. The Resolution is included
below.

The Resolution was issued so as to ensure the successful reimplementation of
the new implied order functionality on NYMEX ACCESS.  By
significantly expanding the price fluctuation limits applicable to trading
activity occurring on NYMEX ACCESS, the Resolution reduces the
possibility that a price limit would be triggered by the implied
functionality.

The Resolution amends, on a temporary basis, Exchange price fluctuation limit
rules - but only with respect to market activity occurring on NYMEX
ACCESS.

Thus, the new price limits that went into effect last week for Natural Gas
are further expanded as provided by the terms of the Resolution.

The Resolution amends the Exchange,s price fluctuation limit rules with
regard to trading on NYMEX ACCESS in four ways:

(1) The initial and subsequent price fluctuation limits (for each Exchange
futures contract that has such limits) are expanded to 200% of the initial
and subsequent price fluctuation limits applicable to the first two contract
months for energy contracts, or to the first contract month with limits in
effect for metals contracts, of that futures contract under the applicable
rule.

(2) This expanded limit (e.g., 200% of the limits for the front two months
for energy contracts) is applicable to all contract months for that futures
contract.

(3) In the event that an expanded price limit was touched by a bid or offer,
trading on NYMEX ACCESS generally would be halted immediately, rather
than requiring the market to trade at that price for five minutes. During the
last 90 minutes of a NYMEX ACCESS session, the market would be halted
only far as long as it takes for the system to incorporate expanded price
limits.

(4) As a clarification, the Resolution suspends use of certain &haircuts8
narrowing price limits based on notional settlement prices.  Specifically,
NYMEX Rule 6.56 (Settlement Prices and Price Fluctuation Limits for NYMEX
ACCESS) establishes the use of notional settlement prices as the base
point for price limits (until the actual settlement prices from the RTH
session can be input into the system.)  NYMEX ACCESS will continue to
use such notional settlement prices under the Resolution.  However, Rule 6.56
reduces applicable price limits by certain specified percentages during the
period when notional settlement prices are used as the base point for
establishing limits. Such &haircuts8 are not being used under the Resolution;
the Exchange will resume use of such haircuts following the expiration of the
Resolution.

Finally, the Resolution also clarifies one aspect of existing Exchange
practice.  In the event that a contract trading on NYMEX ACCESS
traded for five minutes at a price fluctuation limit applicable to Regular
Trading Hours (RTH) trading, then the RTH session would open with expanded
price fluctuation limits as provided under the applicable rule.  This
practice will continue to be followed during the period when the Resolution
is in effect, even though there had been no temporary cessation of trading
during the NYMEX ACCESS trading session because the market had not
hit the expanded limits applicable only to NYMEX ACCESS.

*  * * *
As noted, these temporary amendments to the Exchange,s price limits shall
expire on February 1, 2001, unless Members are notified otherwise by the
Exchange.
*  * * *

If you have any questions, please contact Stu Homler, Director, NYMEX
ACCESS Operations, NYMEX ACCESS Department, at (212)
299-2754, Matt Morano, NYMEX ACCESS Department, at (212) 299-2679, or
Brian Regan, Senior Associate General Counsel, at (212) 299-2207.

APPROVED RESOLUTION OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS REGARDING PRICE
FLUCTUATION LIMITS FOR EXCHANGE CONTRACTS

The Executive Committee of the Board of Directors hereby

Resolves that, until further notice, the price fluctuation limit rules for
each futures contract that is listed for trading on NYMEX ACCESSc and that
has such applicable rules shall continue in effect except as amended below
with regard to market activity occurring on NYMEX ACCESSc:

The initial and subsequent price fluctuation limits (for each Exchange
futures contract that has such limits) shall be expanded to 200% of the
initial and subsequent price fluctuation limits applicable to the first two
contract months of that futures contract that have price limits under the
applicable rule.

This expanded limit (200% of the limits for the first two months with limits)
shall be applicable to all contract months for that futures contract.

In the event that such a price fluctuation limit is reached by a bona fide
bid at the high price fluctuation limit or a bona fide offer at the low price
fluctuation limit, trading on NYMEX ACCESSc shall be halted immediately
except as directed otherwise by the President or the President,s designee.
Following resumption of trading, the price limits in effect shall be 200% of
the limits applicable to RTH trading.  In the event that a limit is touched
during the last 90 minutes of a NYMEX ACCESSc session, the market shall be
halted briefly, and price limits shall be expanded thereafter

In addition, in the event that a contract trading on NYMEX ACCESSc traded for
five minutes during the NYMEX ACCESS session at a price fluctuation
limit applicable to the Regular Trading Hours session, then the RTH session
shall open with expanded price fluctuation limits as provided under the
applicable rule, even though no temporary cessation of trading occurred
during the NYMEX ACCESSc trading session.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=mark.taylor@enron.com&refd
oc=(00-421)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


The water analysis that I sent you is for Gleason.  Over the weekend we put
the other water analysis studies for the other plants on DealBench.  Please
let me know if you have any other questions.  Thanks!
Ben


I would line up CA next.

Let me look over what Lee sent then I'll call (or you can call when you get
free).

How was the game?

Thanks,

Kay

"Thompson, Peter J." <peterthompson@akllp.com> on 12/11/2000 10:11:37 AM
To: <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: GE Breakout Contract

I am going to be on a conference call for the next hour or so. Please
e-mail me or leave a voice mail mesage on how you want me to proceed
with the Enron South America Agreement and also what the next agreement
to be finalized should be.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 9:50 AM
To: Thompson, Peter J.
Subject: GE Breakout Contract

Re:  ESA.  Getting close.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/11/2000
08:49
AM ---------------------------

Brett R Wiggs
12/10/2000 06:32 PM

To:   Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:   John R Ayres/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject:  GE Breakout Contract

Kay:

Lee Johnson and John Ayres are going to meet Monday morning at 8:30 to
go
through all the technical information in the contract to confirm
everything.  They should get back to you very quickly with any changes.
I
think the primary thing they are discussing is using a combined
guarantee
rather than single unit.

Thanks,
Brett


Christie,

Thanks for helping out.  Attached is a one page "intro" to the project that
Vince and I are undertaking.  Please let me know how you would like it
"transformed" before passing it along to the leadership at Enron.

You have the basic story--Enron's leadership purposefully and very
successfully transformed the company.  We plan to document in broad strokes
the "plan" as it was set out, and trace its evolution through the history
of Enron's history.  The final result will be a 20-40 page paper written in
the style of a Harvard Business Review piece.

Please let me know what else you may need.  I'll put it together for you.

Thanks again,

John

 - EnronProposal.doc

John D. Martin
Carr P. Collins Chair in Finance
Finance Department
Baylor University
PO Box 98004
Waco, TX 76798
254-710-4473 (Office)
254-710-1092 (Fax)
J_Martin@Baylor.edu
web:    http://hsb.baylor.edu/html/martinj/home.html


Are they going to send a new invoice with changed amounts??  Do they know not to do anything going forward?

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hueter, Barbara A.
Sent:	Wednesday, November 07, 2001 11:55 AM
To:	Steffes, James D.
Subject:	Stokes Bartholomew invoice

Jim,

I apologize for taking so long to get back to you on this.

As I said during our call last week, I have not ever seen an invoice before.  As I recal from this summer, Stokes kept me posted on the fiscal/tax crisis in TN but I did not ask them to do so explicitly.  As I understood it, I was one of a number of clients they were keeping posted.  They were well aware that we no longer owned the 2 plants and thus were no longer taxpayers.  The work that I requested in covering the Energy Working Group meetings during the late summer and fall.  Also, they represent Tenaska and possibly Calpine and Allegheny and should be splitting those expenses among us.


Bloomberg was mistaken on this one. They'll be sending out a new confirm soon.

Thanks,
Kate

Stephanie Piwetz   12/19/2000 02:19 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: deal 482760.01

Kate,
trade of Tom Alonso
we have term in system as 12/21/00-12/31/00 mon-sat
Bloomberg shows 12/26/00-12/30-00  mon-sat

please check and let me know
Stephanie


Please find attached Credit's EOL responses for 2/16/00.

Regards,
Molly


Must be nice to be a Wall Street executive

"Frank F. Zerilli" <fzerilli@optonline.net> on 08/23/2000 10:11:35 PM
To: jarnold@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Vacation

John,

I will be out of the office vacationing up in Martha's Vineyard with the
family through Labor Day.  Good Luck with Debby...talk to you in Sep.


Start Date: 4/10/01; HourAhead hour: 6;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041006.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 6 / Preferred:   2.00 / Final:   1.97)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: WheelSHAST
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/10/01
  UNIT_ID: WSENGY_1_UNIT 4


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Meeting - PRC - CANNOT CANCEL

Date:		8/21/2000
Time:		4:30 PM - 5:30 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


**********************************************************************
The following message was sent to you as an opt-in subscriber to The
eDirect Network. We will continue to bring you valuable offers on the
products and services that interest you most. If you wish to unsubscribe
please copy and paste the following link into your web browser or
click here. http://www.optin-offers.net/ednu/?e=pmims@enron.com
**********************************************************************

Everyone has an opinion...
..Share yours with us and we'll give you chances to WIN CASH!

Dear PATRICE,

If you are interested in completing surveys for the chance to win cash and
prizes - become an NPD Online Research Member! Click below to get started:
http://www.optin-offers.net/edn/?i=1729756161&m=11654285&c=814

Have some fun! Take a Chance! Make a Difference!

The ONE step process:
Simply complete the form on the website to become an NPD Online Research
Member and automatically you are registered for cash prizes! The Goal???
If you join NPD's Online Research Team, you could win $1,000!

The NPD Group is a top ten marketing research company and we are looking
for people just like YOU.

A VERY IMPORTANT NOTE
Your privacy is of great concern to you and to NPD.  Any information you
provide will be kept strictly CONFIDENTIAL. We will never try to sell you
anything, and we will never sell your personal information. Participation
is free and confidentiality is guaranteed. You can count on that.

HOW DO I GET STARTED?
Please visit us at:
http://www.optin-offers.net/edn/?i=1729756161&m=11654285&c=814

See our site for Official Sweepstakes rules.


Calif. Senate Panel To Cite Reliant, Enron For Contempt
Dow Jones Energy Service, 07/19/01
Davis administration tells consultants to sell energy stocks
Associated Press Newswires, 07/19/01
INDIA: AES threatens to abandon Indian venture.
Reuters English News Service, 07/19/01
N Amer Pwr Highlights: Natural Gas Futures Drop Below $3
Dow Jones Energy Service, 07/19/01
FERC Agenda Eyes Tightening Of Pipeline Affiliate Rules
Dow Jones Energy Service, 07/19/

AES CEO Meeting Indian Power Minister on Dabhol, Paper Report
Bloomberg, 07/19/01

AES Corp. May Exit Indian Power Venture Over Past-Due Payments
Bloomberg, 07/19/01

Calif. Senate Panel To Cite Reliant, Enron For Contempt

07/19/2001
Dow Jones Energy Service
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

(This article was originally published Wednesday.)

LOS ANGELES -(Dow Jones)- A California Senate committee Wednesday voted to
cite Reliant Energy (REI) with contempt because the company has refused to
provide documents for an investigation into wholesale electricity prices in
the state, said committee Chairman Joe Dunn, D-Santa Ana.
The committee also voted to forward a contempt charge for Enron Corp (ENE) to
the full Senate, where it will be voted on. If the charge is approved, the
Senate will vote on punishment, which could include hefty fines or
incarceration of executives.
Talks between Enron and committee attorneys Monday seemed to indicate the
company would agree to committee demands, but since then it has become clear
the company doesn't plan to comply, Dunn said.
"If you had asked two days ago I'd have said we are cautiously optimistic
about Enron. Now I'm pessimistic about it. We felt they were indicating to us
a willingness to do what the other generators were willing to do, but the
bottom line is that they are not, despite their cooperative-sounding words.
We are no closer to them coming into compliance than we were a week ago,"
Dunn said.
The Senate Select Committee to Investigate Market Manipulation is requesting
that Reliant and Enron provide 16 kinds of documents related to market
behavior, rent a depository for the documents, and sign the committee's
version of a confidentiality agreement. Both generators have refused to meet
those demands, Dunn said.
The committee will drop its contempt charges at any time before a full Senate
vote if either generator agrees to its requests.
A report detailing Enron's contempt charge will be sent to the full Senate on
Thursday for introduction, but is expected to be referred to the Senate Rules
Committee for review before a floor vote.
Dunn said he didn't know how long the report would be considered in the Rules
Committee, but he will "certainly push them to do it as soon as possible."
Enron spokesman Mark Palmer said the company "will continue to negotiate"
with the committee.
Legislators are scheduled to begin a monthlong break Friday, but aren't
certain that will happen because they still need to pass a budget bill and
are trying to approve a bill to rescue Edison International (EIX) unit
Southern California Edison before leaving.
Dunn said it would take a few days to prepare a report on Reliant's contempt
charge.
"We may not be able to forward that report to the Senate floor until the day
we get back from recess," Dunn said.
No one at Reliant could be immediately reached for comment.
The committee originally was poised to cite seven other electricity
generators for contempt, but all eventually agreed to provide the requested
information.
A Reliant spokesman said later that the company's main difference with the
committee centered on the signing of the confidentiality agreement. Reliant
would rather the committee secure a protective order before the company turns
over the requested documents, said spokesman Richard Wheatley.
"We respectfully decline to waive our objections, because we have a lot of
trade secrets and proprietary information at stake," he said.
When asked if the company would take legal action against the committee,
Wheatley said Reliant was "keeping all options open."
"But, really, we hope to work this out on an informal basis," Wheatley said.
"We don't think this is that big of a stumbling block."
Enron filed suit against the committee last week over objections to its
subpoena of certain financial documents, and said at hearings last week that
it may sue over its contempt charge as well.
-By Jessica Berthold, Dow Jones Newswires; 310-962-2843;
jessica.berthold@dowjones.com

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Davis administration tells consultants to sell energy stocks

07/19/2001
Associated Press Newswires
Copyright 2001. The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.

SACRAMENTO (AP) - The Davis administration on Wednesday told consultants
buying energy for the state to sell their stock holdings in energy companies
immediately or quit their jobs.
Nine consultants divested by a noon deadline, but critics said the order by
Gov. Gray Davis came months too late to protect the public's interest.
The order, issued at Davis' direction, was contained in a memo to Tom
Hannigan, director of the state Department of Water Resources. Legal Affairs
Secretary Barry Goode wrote that it was "imperative that you give instruction
immediately" to those concerned.
"We expect, and have always expected, the state's consultants to uphold the
highest ethical standards," the memo states. "That standard is not met by
those who hold a financial interest in one or more energy companies while
trading on behalf of the state on energy related matters.
Under pressure from Secretary of State Bill Jones, a Republican who hopes to
challenge Democrat Davis for re-election next year, the administration moved
to obtain statements of economic interest from the energy consultants. The
consultants were hired earlier this year to advise the Department of Water
Resources on electricity purchases for California's financially strapped
utilities.
The economic statements showed that several consultants held stock in energy
generators, including Calpine Corp. and Enron. One consultant reported he
sold stock holdings in Edison International and Dynegy when he began work for
the state.

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

INDIA: AES threatens to abandon Indian venture.
By Himangshu Watts

07/19/2001
Reuters English News Service
(C) Reuters Limited 2001.

NEW DELHI, July 19 (Reuters) - U.S. energy firm AES Corp may walk out of a
troubled distribution venture in eastern India due to a difficult regulatory
enivironment, the firm's CEO said on Thursday.
Dennis Bakke told reporters AES will sell its 51-percent stake in CESCO, a
distribution firm in the eastern province of Orissa, unless the firm was paid
its dues, allowed to raise tariffs and given a better operating environment.
"If satisfactory resolution of these matters is not expeditiously reached,
AES will be forced to abandon its commitment to the distribution company," he
said.
AES holds a 49 percent stake in Orissa Power Generation Corporation (OPGC),
which runs a 420-MW plant in the state and sells power to state-run Gridco, a
state-run transmission firm.
Bakke said Gridco owed OPGC about $45 million and the U.S. firm had filed for
arbitration in Orissa to recover the dues accumulated over two and a half
years.
He said GRIDCO was not paying OPGC, the generating company, saying that
CESCO, the distribution firm, owed it money.
"These are standalone businesses, and there is no basis for any such linkage
or offset," he said.
Bakke said the state's regulatory commission had ordered CESCO to transfer
all receivables collected into an escrow account, but the company could not
abide by the instruction as it needed money to pay its employees.
However, it complied after the local government initiated criminal
proceedings against the managing director of CESCO, he said. AES will deposit
all revenues into the escrow account.
"Hence funds will not be available to pay the 8,500 CESCO employees salaries
due July 31 and thereafter."
He said the regulatory regime in Orissa fixed tariffs at levels which did not
allow it to recover its costs.
Orissa officials were not immediately available for comment.
He said AES was considering selling its stake in CESCO but could enter into a
management contract in the transition period.
However, AES will look at other opportunities in India if it finds a better
regulatory environment.
Bakke said AES had not made any proposal to take over Enron Corp's troubled
Dabhol project but it was a "potential business" in which it might be
interested at some stage.
Apart from Enron, which has threatened to walk out of its $2.9-billion Indian
venture, U.S. firm, Cogentrix, and Electricite de France have also packed
their bags.
India, whose 100,000 MW generation capacity is 13 percent short of demand,
began power reforms in the early 1990s to attract foreign investment to
increase power availability to industry and almost 80,000 villages without
electricity.

N Amer Pwr Highlights: Natural Gas Futures Drop Below $3

07/19/2001
Dow Jones Energy Service
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

General News *Nymex Natural Gas Futures Below $3/MMBTu For 1st Time In 15
Mo>r/nerc
*FERC Set To Act Wed On Calif Power Sales Refunds>r/wscc
*Calif. Senate Panel Cite Reliant, Enron For Contempt>R/WSCC
*Midwest Power-Grid Operator Mulls Plan To Span Regions>R/MAIN
*Ill. Officials: Midwest Generation's Emissions Are Normal>r/main
*Amer Elec Power 2Q Ongoing Earnings To Exceed Plan>r/nerc
*Calpine In 10-Yr Pact To Sell 100MW Power To Exelon>r/main
*FERC Agenda Eyes Tightening Of Pipeline Affiliate Rules>r/nerc

Nuclear News *NC 1,100-MW McGuire 2 Up To 60% Power; Rising>R/SERC
*Wis. 512-MW Pt Beach 1 Ramping Up To Full Power>R/MAIN
*Ill. 1,145-MW Byron 1;1,145-MW Byron 2 Up To 100%>R/MAIN
*Texas 1,150-MW Comanche Pk 2 In Start Up From Reactor Trip>R/ERCT
Fossil News *SD 110-MW Of New Pwr On Line; 240-MW Due Soon>R/MAPP
*Texas 500-MW PSEG,Panda Pwr Plant Began Commercial Ops>R/ERCT

Markets *Northeast Power: Prices Steady To Lower On Temps, Loads>R/maac
*Texas Power: Prices Fall As Nuclear Plant Returns To Grid>R/ERCT
*West Power: Daily Mkt Down On Sat Inclusion, Mild Fri Weather>R/WSCC
*Midwest Power: Prices Slide On Weak Natural Gas Prices>R/ECAR

FERC Agenda Eyes Tightening Of Pipeline Affiliate Rules
By Bryan Lee

07/19/2001
Dow Jones Energy Service
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

OF DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

WASHINGTON -(Dow Jones)- Federal energy regulators are scheduled to act next
week on new rules affecting natural gas pipeline affiliate dealings.
Sources say the U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is debating action
at next Wednesday's open meeting to tighten up rules prohibiting pipelines
from providing market-sensitive information to marketing affiliates.
FERC rules allow monopoly pipeline companies to market natural gas in
competitive markets providing they adopt codes of conduct that prevent the
passing of information that provides a competitive advantage to their
gas-marketing affiliates.
Similar rules are in place on the electric side for vertically integrated
utilities with marketing units competing in wholesale power markets.
The changes under consideration stem from the commission's investigation of
El Paso Natural Gas Co.'s (EPG) controversial contract with a marketing
affiliate for pipeline capacity into California, according to sources.
The affiliate transaction has been blamed for California's dramatic runup in
natural gas prices over the past year, which contributed to the state's
unprecedentedly high electricity costs last year.
The proposed code-of-conduct changes also reflect the sweeping convergence
between the natural gas and power sectors in the years since FERC deregulated
the pipeline industry in the 1980s.
FERC's rules prohibit pipelines from sharing market-sensitive information
with their gas-marketing affiliates. But the rules don't address the
pipeline's power marketing affiliates. The commission is looking to expand
the code-of-conduct rules to address all marketing affiliates, sources said.
These sources say the template for the pending change can be found in the
conditions FERC imposed in a 1999 order authorizing the acquisition of
Pittsburgh-based Consolidated Natural Gas by Dominion Resources (D).
The commission approved the electricity-natural gas convergence merger,
contingent on Dominion agreeing to adopt codes of conduct applying equally to
its gas and power marketing affiliates.
The planned rule changes would apply to electric utilities with pipeline
investments, such as CMS Energy (CMS), Duke Energy (DUK) and American
Electric Power Co. (AEP). It is unclear how the changes would affect joint
operating agreements, such as the one between Entergy Corp. (ETR) and
privately held Koch Industries.
But the largest impact will be for large pipeline companies with extensive
power marketing operations and investments in power plants.
For example, El Paso, Williams Cos. (WMB) and Enron Corp. (ENE), represent
about 70% of the interstate pipeline industry and are among the nation's top
power marketers and merchant power plant developers.
One FERC source described the order scheduled for commission vote next week
as "a work in progress," while another said the matter is in such a state of
flux that "it might not be safe to write anything yet."

-By Bryan Lee, Dow Jones Newswires; 202-862-6647; Bryan.Lee@dowjones.com

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

AES CEO Meeting Indian Power Minister on Dabhol, Paper Reports
2001-07-19 02:00 (New York)
 New Delhi, July 19 (Bloomberg) -- AES Corp. Chief Executive
Dennis Bakke will likely discuss taking over Enron Corp.'s Dabhol
Power Co. when he meets India's power minister Suresh Prabhu
today, Business Standard said, without citing officials.
     Dabhol, 65 percent owned by Enron, and Maharashtra State
Electricity Board, its only customer, have been quarrelling for
seven months over unpaid bills. The board has stopped
buying power from Dabhol and construction work on the $3 billion
plant was halted last month after lenders stopped funding it.
     Bakke will also likely discuss AES's own payment problems at
its 49 percent owned Orissa Power Generation Co. in eastern Orissa
state, the paper said. AES is struggling to recover 2.1 billion
rupees ($44 million) owed it by the state-run transmission
company, the Business Standard reported earlier.
     Bakke is also likely to meet India's Finance Minister
Yashwant Sinha, the paper said.
--Ravil Shirodkar in the New Delhi newsroom (91 11) 334 8812, or
at rshirodkar@bloomberg.net /rb
Story illustration: To graph the shares of Enron Corp, click
ES Corp. May Exit Indian Power Venture Over Past-Due Payments
2001-07-19 15:35 (New York)

AES Corp. May Exit Indian Power Venture Over Past-Due Payments
  New Delhi, July 19 (Bloomberg) -- AES Corp., the biggest U.S.
power company, said it may withdraw from a power distribution
venture in India's eastern Orissa state because of unpaid bills.
     AES, which runs a 420-megawatt power plant in Orissa, is owed
$44 million by the state-run transmission company, of which the
U.S. company owns 49 percent. AES Chief Executive Dennis Bakke met
with India's power minister Suresh Prabhu in New Delhi today.
     ``We have to take such drastic steps when we don't get
paid,'' said Sandra Ross, an official in AES's investor relations
department in Arlington, Virginia. ``These issues have to get
resolved.''
     AES is the latest in a series of overseas power companies
that have faced payment problems or withdrawn investment from the
country citing delays, bureaucracy and the slow pace of reforms.
India says it needs $200 billion to double the nation's generating
capacity and avoid power failures that last year swept across much
of northern India. Blackouts are common in many Indian cities.
     ``AES will be forced to abandon its commitment to the
distribution company'' if the past-due bills aren't paid, AES's
Bakke said on Star TV, broadcast in India today. He said AES is
filing for arbitration of the dispute.

                               Enron

     Enron Corp.'s Dabhol Power Co. and a state electricity board
in India's western state of Maharashtra have been quarrelling for
seven months over $64 million of unpaid bills. The board, Dahbol's
sole customer, stopped buying power from the unit, saying it's too
expensive. Construction of the $3 billion plant's second phase
stopped last month after lenders cut funding.
     Four other foreign power companies, including Electricite de
France, Europe's largest, have pulled out of Indian power projects
worth $3 billion.
     ``We're not happy with the way things are,'' said AES's Ross.
``In the future, if payments resume, we could buy it back.''
     Arlington, Virginia-based AES owns stakes in 173 power plants
generating 59,000 megawatts worldwide, including utilities in the
U.S. and Latin America.
     AES owns 49 percent of the Orissa Power Generation Co. that
supplies 600,000 customers in eastern India.
     AES shares rose as much as $1.37, or 3.8 percent, to $37.80.

--Ravil Shirodkar and Anindya Mukherjee in the New Delhi newsroom
(91 11) 334 8812, or at rshirodkar@bloomberg.net /rb


Just FYI -
The tie point and Cal PX deals we uploaded this morning did in fact load as
Enron Online deals. Oh joy!

I talked to Will Smith, who said he thought he'd heard this complaint before
and very cordially agreed to take a look at it. I just thought I'd keep you
informed of the latest episode in what I'm sure will be an award-winning
series. (How about "The Good, the Bad, and the Cal PX Bridge"?)

Kate


Good Afternoon,

The IT shop in Portland now has a new Bat Phone to contact IT 24 hours a day
7 days a week.  Please call us at

503-464-7376

and this number will ring at the production support phones during work hours
or inform you of the on-call pager number during off-hours or weekends.
As always, we still love walk-up visits and direct phone calls, but if there
is ever a question of who to call, this number is always available.

Thanks,  IT Production Support


Daren - there is flow on meter 1386 for 1/4/01.  Deal 150325 expired on day
3.  Could you please extend this deal or create a new one?  Thanks.

AL


---------------------- Forwarded by Hap Boyd/EWC/Enron on 04/19/2001 10:58 AM
---------------------------

Hap Boyd
04/19/2001 09:29 AM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Adam Umanoff/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Eric Newell/EWC/Enron@ENRON, John
Lamb/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Bob Gates/EWC/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: SCE & Enron Discussions on MOU - Proposed 4.19.01 Conference
Call at 12:30 Houston Time

Jim,
Ernon Wind appreiates item number 4 - getting full payment for past due and
going forward power deliveries. Additionally we would like the following:

1. Agreement that we can deliver up to the nameplatre capacity on our
existing contracts
2.Assurance of transmission access for the nameplate amount on all of our
contracts
3.Additional offtake agreements for future projects at a reasonable price
4 Ability to have EWG status tather than QF status under our existing
contracts
5. Support for the voluntary energy pricing provisions of S.B. 47x

Thanks,
Hap Boyd


<<CSFB_EnergyTech_dec5.pdf>>

Summary of Energy Technology Bulletin:

* Energy Co-opportunity (ECO) and Capstone have entered into a
contractual relationship whereby ECO will be a preferred provider of and
will offer Capstone's 30kW microturbine unit to the electric cooperative
industry.  The contract also calls for the purchase of 76 units, which ECO
believes will sell rapidly given the interest indicated by its customers.
* Dublin, Ireland-based power developer Eirtricity is considering the
development of what would be the world's largest wind farm.  The 500 MW wind
farm would see a combination of land and offshore-based wind turbines,
likely in County Wicklow.
* Calpine c*Power, a subsidiary of Calpine Corporation, and AFS
Trinity have entered into a strategic partnership that will see Calpine
c*Power market AFS' flywheel products as a component of its Reliable Power
Systems that are designed to serve datacom ports.

Best Regards,

Energy Technology Research
CREDIT | FIRST
SUISSE | BOSTON

Marko Pencak (Hardware)
Neil Stein (Independent Power and e-Commerce)
Cameron Jeffreys (Associate)

 - CSFB_EnergyTech_dec5.pdf


If you're not busy, I'll come in and check for you if you'de like.

Marnie Lamb@ENRON
10/17/2000 10:14 AM
To: Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Vacation

I don't see that icon, but I don't really know what I'm looking for.

	From:  Dana Davis @ ECT                           10/17/2000 10:05 AM

To: Marnie Lamb/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Vacation

Thanks!  I will be placing it on the calendar.  Do you have the icon on your
Lotus Notes workspace desktop?  It's the  "Merchant Finance on ECTHOU_..."
icon.

Marnie Lamb@ENRON
10/17/2000 09:45 AM
To: Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Vacation

That should be fine.  Just let us know for sure when you know.

	From:  Dana Davis @ ECT                           10/16/2000 02:45 PM

To: Marnie Lamb/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Vacation

Marnie -

I think I need to take a half day of vacation Friday, Oct. 20th.  I am
involved in some church activities next weekend and I won't find out if I
need this time off until tonight or Wednesday night.  Is that too short of
notice?


Ditto Credit.

	Tana Jones@ECT
	04/25/2001 04:56 PM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marcus
Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Marie Heard/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Robbi Rossi/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jane McBride/AP/Enron@Enron,
Andrea Calo/SA/Enron@Enron, Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL approvals, 04-25-01

----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 04/25/2001 04:56 PM -----

	Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate
	04/25/2001 04:53 PM

		 To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/ENRON@enronXgate,
Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Cynthia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, Enron Europe
Global CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Claudia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, William S
Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa Lees/ENRON@enronXgate, Juana
Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT,
Karen O'Day/ENRON@enronXgate, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Kelly
Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian Lindsay/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, EOL Call Center@ECT, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Amy
Heffernan/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Molly LaFuze/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Danny Clark/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Teresa
Mandola/ENRON@enronXgate, Bill Kyle/ENRON@enronXgate, Amber Ebow/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL approvals, 04-25-01

Please see attached.


Here is the "back office"/systems revised presentation.  Thanks
Ben
3-7998
---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 05/12/2000
06:26 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Leslie Reeves                           05/12/2000 05:29 PM

To: Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Presentation

---------------------- Forwarded by Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT on 05/12/2000 05:29
PM ---------------------------

Shari Mao
05/12/2000 04:42 PM
To: Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Presentation

I've changed the Deal Flow Page to include additional headcount and the
Support Structure Summary Page to include costs.  Let me know if you need
additional changes!

Thanks,
Shari
3-3859