Mark Taylor and I reviewed the subject agreement and have some general
comments.

Given the agreement is between EBS and the outside counterparties we would
like to eliminate any mention of EnronOnline (the only place were we feel it
may be necessary is in the failover article IV).   EBS has the EIN which can
be used as an alternative to the Internet and the customer has agreed to use
such alternative.
The term can be month to month with thirty days written notice by either
party.  No need to mention EnronOnline or the pilot program.
Can we make this agreement much more customer friendly?  This appears to be
an agreement that you use with customers who are being guranteed a certain
level of service (as evidenced by the reference to ePowered Content in
Article XIII).  We would like to keep the agreement focused on access to
facility, letter of authorization and the interconnect order if possible.   I
understand that you are commiting to EnronOnline a certain level of service
which is predicated upon your ability to get assurances from our customers
however we should deal with that in our agreement if necessary.
What is the extent of the equiptment that we will be housing at the
facilities?  If it is limited this would give us another opportunity to
reduce the scope of the contract.

Lets discuss tomorrow and see if we can get this wrapped up.  Lorraine will
schedule.  Thanks


I am getting the lasik eye surgury on Fri and will have bandages on my eyes.

	"Sherry Radack" <sherry@radack.com>
	02/13/2001 08:01 PM

		 To: "Richard B. & Julie Sanders" <Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com>
		 cc: "Bruce Oakley" <boakley@bracepatt.com>
		 Subject:

i can't do dinner saturday night.  how about friday night?


Thanks for your help today.  Jill is trying to execute this deal first thing in the morning.

I still do not know what meter number Cabot would nom to on CNG.


Tanya:  I'd like to send our Schedule to Rabobank today since we will be off
Monday, Jan. 15 and I have been called for jury duty on Tuesday, Jan. 16.  I
will ask Angela Davis (a finance lawyer with swap experience who is helping
us out on the structured deals) to handle this for me.  I don't want to deal
with Rabobank's form of Schedule as a basis for discussion and I am told that
this deal closes Friday, Jan. 19..

A voice mail would be greatly appreciated.  Thanks.  Sara

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 01/12/2001 09:18 AM -----

	Sara Shackleton
	01/10/2001 12:23 PM

		 To: Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT
		 cc: Angela Davis/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Project Cerberus - amended to introduce the swap counterparty
Rabobank ("Rabo")

Tanya:

Enron Corp, (global finance) has a FASB 125 structured deal executed in Dec.,
2000 which requires amendment for tax purposes.  A new  total return equity
swap on EOG stock will need to be executed between ENA and Rabo.  ENA must be
the swap counterparty ("normal course of business") for the legal opinion
which must be issued for the structure.  I would like to send Rabo our ISDA
format so as to avoid any surprises; time is short.  I assume we do not want
a CSA but will require an Enron Corp. guaranty.  Do we want cross default and
Credit Event Upon Merger to apply to the parties?   Do we want to
add/eliminate additional events of default?  The ultimate Schedule will
probably look very different from our standard but we need to urge our format
as much as possible.

Please call me to update.  This update is currently scheduled to close next
Friday.  Thanks.  Sara

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


check with nowlan etc about this.
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 10/26/2000
04:42 PM ---------------------------

Patrick Danaher@ENRON
10/26/2000 02:50 PM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Don Schroeder/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer
Burns/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: mkt thoughts

How about tomorrow 10/27/00 @ 3:00 PM in room # 3143d?


Rick --

How about sitting down on Wednesday am (say 10 am) to do this?

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Brown, Ivonne
Sent:	Friday, August 10, 2001 11:40 AM
To:	Hill, Garrick
Cc:	Steffes, James D.
Subject:	Chad Landry and PIP Info.
Importance:	High

Rick,

As you know we had Chad's evaluation yesterday and I'll be sending you a copy for your records.  I'm also attaching the Performance Improvement Plan and the instructions on how to complete it for your convenience.  Jim Steffes mentioned that he would like to assist in putting the PIP together and he will be contacting you.

While completing the PIP you are encouraged to consider Chad's input before finalizing the development plan.  The plan should also address the specific performance areas and examples provided in the employee's evaluation. (This form must also be reviewed by legal before presenting.  Please email me a copy before setting-up your meeting with Chad.)

Please email or call me if you need additional information.

Sincerely,
Ivonne Brown
Associate & Analyst Program
Ext. 57106


GET RID OF DEBT - NOW and FOREVER!

  IT'S JUST A PHONE CALL AWAY!

 Get a FREE QUOTE On Consolidating Your Bills

 * Drastically Reduce Your Interest Rates!

 * Stop Creditors From Harassing You!

 * Slash Your Monthly Payments in Half!

  WE HAVE HELPED THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE JUST LIKE YOU!

  WE CAN DO THE FOLLOWING FOR YOU:

  Drastically lower your interest rates

  One easy monthly payment

  Get your peace of mind back again

 Simply send your
 NAME:
 ADDRESS:
 CITY/STATE:
 PHONENUMBER:(H)
             (W)
 BEST TIME TO CALL:
 AMOUNT OF DEBT:
 (All information is strictly confidential)

 To be removed from our lists please hit reply and type remove in the
subject line.

 Thank you


ADMINISTRATIVE

Houston, Crisis Management Plans - Donnie Willmann and Marysol Martinez are evaluating responses from the international facilities to determine which facilities have a written Crisis Management Plan. Enron Corp EHS staff will assist those facilities that do not have a plan in the development of the Crisis Plan

EUROPE

Poland, ENS Power Plant - Alan Stringer conducted a gap analysis of the status of implementation of Enron Guidelines and identified that 80% of the guidelines would be in place by the time of the facility audit is conducted next week by Chuck Goode audit team.

ENRON GLOBAL ASSETS

Venezuela, Vengas, Calife, Accroven - Edgar Zuleta  conducted Smith Driving Training and conducted EHS audits  at Vengas and Calife.

Argentina, TGS - Henry Van discussed with Florentino Tobares and Enrique Rolando of TGS the verification and certification requirements for obtaining methane emission credits should TGS decide to implement a fugitive methane emissions testing program.

CAPITAL PROJECTS

Yamaguchi Power Station (Ube, Japan)-  This proposal is for a site in southern Japan that would be a 1,400 MW coal-fired plant, with the coal being shipped to the site.  Joe Kolb completed his review of a draft of the environmental impact assessment scoping document, sent by Alan Stringer, for the Yamaguchi Power Station in Ube, Japan.

DEPARTMENT PROJECTS

Corporate Responsibility Annual Report - The 2000 Corporate Responsibility Annual Report is located on the web at <http://ehs.corp.enron.com> Susan Worthen is awaiting final revisions to the distribution list.  Lauren Iannarone is drafting cover letters for Ken Lay.

Environmental Emerging Issues Database/Social Responsibility Risk Assessment Tool: Gavin Dillingham demonstrated the database to a group of EHS employees this morning. He is now waiting to be notified whether or not this database will be developed further.

ENVIRONMENTAL STRATEGIES GROUP

Emissions Trading - Ontario, Canada Proposal:  Lisa Jacobson coordinated the drafting and submission of comments to Ontario in response to its proposed emissions trading program. Comments were coordinated with, ENA Canada, EGM Emissions and Government Affairs, as the proposal could impact power trading, emissions trading, and power development/investment.

 Emissions Offsets/Early Reduction Credits -- EES:  Mary Schoen has been working with EES Emissions Risk Management group to provide analysis and information that will allow EES create offsets/ERCs and capture environmental value of energy service transaction with a customer in California (Pilkington).

 Environmental Disclosure/Renewable Energy Attributes:  Stacey Bolton represented Enron in PJM's trial run-through of a tracking system for environmental attributes of electricity.  Stacey has worked to promote the use of market-based systems for attribute trading environmental disclosure within the PJM system.

New York SO2 Trading Lawsuit -- EGM:  Jeff Keeler provided EGM Emissions with a recommendation NOT to join a lawsuit against New York State to attempt to overturn its new law restricting the trade of SO2 allowances to sources in certain up-wind states.

REGULATORY TECHNICAL ANALYSIS

Methanol -- Jim Peterson is reviewing proposed regulatory requirements in TSCA to assist Enron Global Markets in their response to a customer request for information on methanol.

EES Information Requests - Marc Phillips provided information to EES personnel about air regulatory requirements for installing an industrial  boiler in Kohler, Wisconsin and a turbine for electricity generation at Universal Studios in California.

Workstation Ergonomic Survey - Russell Tucker conducted a workstation ergonomic evaluation for an Enron Networks employee who indicates he is turning in a worker's compensation claim for work related trauma to his right wrist allegedly contributed to by his workstation set-up. Recommendations were made to reduce the ergonomic risk factors for his workstation.

Laura Glenn
Enron Corp
Environmental, Health & Safety
Phone: (713)646-7330
Fax: (713)345-6164
email: Laura.Glenn@enron.com


Sorry for the delay - my e-mail has been down all day.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 10/13/99 02:24 PM
---------------------------

Edmund Cooper
10/08/99 11:55 AM
To: David Grevelle/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark E Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Viatcheslav Danilov/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Sharp/LON/ECT@ECT, Zuzana
Strmenova/LON/ECT@ECT, Michael R Brown/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: eClearinghouse - confidentiality and exclusivity agreement letter

Dear David,

Here is the version of the above document that Michael and I have drawn up
for you.  Please note that the English law version of the document needs to
be printed on Enron Europe Limited letterhead.

Mark - David has also asked for a Texas law version of this document.  Would
you be able to arrange for one of the Houston lawyers to take a look at the
document and make any necessary changes which would be required as a matter
of Texas law.  Please feel free to give Michael Brown or myself a call if you
need to have a chat about. Thanks.

Kind regards, Edmund.


No Denver region.  The book was named after the office.  We can change the name and it will be a part of the west.

Mike

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Keiser, Kam
Sent:	Monday, January 07, 2002 9:52 AM
To:	Grigsby, Mike
Subject:	Denver

Mike,

Will there be a Denver region for Netco?  I have assumed that everything will be considered West but want to make sure before we set up the books.

Thanks
Kam


Steve Hall is contacting Al Paske regarding the transmission contract.  Apparently they have already been discussing this issue.

ds

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Yoder, Christian
Sent:	Thursday, October 11, 2001 3:10 PM
To:	Scholtes, Diana
Cc:	Denton, Rhonda L.
Subject:	RE: Transmission with Bonneville

Have you been able to come up with any information about this transmission?----cgy

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Scholtes, Diana
Sent:	Tuesday, October 02, 2001 3:13 PM
To:	Yoder, Christian
Subject:	RE: Transmission with Bonneville

I don't.  I will pull our contract with BPA and give you a decent reply!

d

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Yoder, Christian
Sent:	Tuesday, October 02, 2001 9:32 AM
To:	Scholtes, Diana
Cc:	Hall, Steve C. (Legal)
Subject:	FW: Transmission with Bonneville

Diana,
The message below is a routine notification message from our contracts administrator in Houston.  Do you know which agreements she is referrring to and whether or not we need to renew them?  ----cgy

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Denton, Rhonda L.
Sent:	Monday, October 01, 2001 3:02 PM
To:	Yoder, Christian
Cc:	King, Jan M.
Subject:	Transmission with Bonneville

I show that both of the transmission agreements that we had with Bonneville expired 9/31/01.  Do we need to execute firm and non-firm service agreements with them?  I'm copying Jan b/c I'm not sure you are back in town.


The last message in this trail is McMahon's note to the Management Committee members regarding allocations and an attached spreadsheet with his proposed acceptance of allocations.  Just FYI.

I met with Kent Castleman yesterday to get a feel for the areas where McMahon has questions regarding our Net Works budget.  I will pass those along to Brad, Jenny, and Beth today, and will copy you two on that note.  Bowen has already reviewed Kevin Sweeney's budget for Operations.  Kevin reduced his direct costs by $1MM relative to the original budget submitted, and Kent says that Jeff and Ray are fine with that one now.  I don't anticipate much conversation around that on Monday.  --Sally
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Castleman, Kent
Sent:	Thursday, October  11, 2001 5:44 PM
To:	Beck, Sally
Subject:	FW: 2002 Corporate Allocations to EIM

here is the only copy of McMahon's email that I have

Kent

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Castleman, Kent
Sent:	Tuesday, October 09, 2001 4:37 PM
To:	Colwell, Wes
Subject:	FW: 2002 Corporate Allocations to EIM

here is McMahon's email with the attached file

Kent

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Garner, Bruce
Sent:	Tuesday, October 09, 2001 7:49 AM
To:	McMahon, Jeffrey; Bowen Jr., Raymond
Cc:	Castleman, Kent
Subject:	FW: 2002 Corporate Allocations to EIM

I had a discussion with Michael about allocations and the London office I would like to discuss with you.

regards
bruce
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Brown, Michael - COO London
Sent:	09 October 2001 08:21
To:	Garner, Bruce
Subject:	FW: 2002 Corporate Allocations to EIM

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	McMahon, Jeffrey
Sent:	08 October 2001 21:28
To:	Causey, Richard; Whalley, Greg
Cc:	Castleman, Kent; Bowen Jr., Raymond; Brown, Michael - COO London; Buy, Rick; Causey, Richard; Delainey, David; Derrick Jr., James; Dietrich, Janet; Fallon, Jim; Fastow, Andrew; Frevert, Mark; Glisan, Ben; Haedicke, Mark E.; Horton, Stanley; Hughes, James A.; Kean, Steven J.; Kitchen, Louise; Koenig, Mark; Lavorato, John; Lay, Kenneth; Mcconnell, Mike; McMahon, Jeffrey; Shankman, Jeffrey A.; Sherriff, John; Whalley, Greg
Subject:	2002 Corporate Allocations to EIM

Attached please find the corporate allocations for the 2002 fiscal year that EIM will accept.  After unsuccessfully attempting to get some justification for the PROPOSED allocations from many of the various corporate groups, we have had to make a determination ourselves as to what we believe are reasonable charges for the value received from these groups.  This determination was based on several factors including, 2001 actual allocations, expected services provided to EIM, redundant services provided by other groups that are also performed at EIM, etc.

The attached charges are acceptable to EIM and will be used in the budget presentation to the office of the chair unless the allocating groups can come to an agreement with Kent Castleman of EIM as to a revision of these charges before such meeting.

 << File: Allocations to EIM 2002 Plan v2.xls >>

Jeffrey McMahon and Ray Bowen


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/23/2001
06:10 PM ---------------------------

ERisk <eRisks_news@email.eRisks.com> on 03/23/2001 11:36:33 AM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: ERisk Essentials

?		www.erisk.com
		What's  New at ERisk.com - 23 March 2001

Weekly  Review	This week's economic, banking and P_insurance news, from  an
enterprise risk management perspective. Read it here...

Analysis
	In this week's Analysis:
	 Taking the long view on credit risk management
	 The risks of cracking down on insurance fraud and
	 Fannie Mae controversy puts debt benchmark in jeopardy

Feature	The treatment of operational risk is one of the more controversial,
and poorly understood, elements of Basle's proposed revisions to the Capital
Accord. In this exclusive  article, Penny Cagan of Zurich Financial Services
explains what  the Basle Accord proposals mean for most banks, where there's
room for improvement  and how to get started on building an operational risk
framework

iConference  Archive
	Couldn't make it to our iConference on Risk Transfer,  featuring Martin Nance
of AIG Structured Products and Barry Finkelstein,  Joe Parsons and Chris
Crevier of Merrill Lynch? Check out the iConference  Archive later this week
to find out what you missed. Still available:  The proceedings of our two
recent Basle  iConferences, featuring Bill Treacy of the Federal Reserve
Board,  Ashish Dev of Key Bank and Andy Hickman of ERisk

Events
Calendar 	Feeling the need to network? Check  out our comprehensive listing of
risk management events around the world  in the Events  Calendar

		The  ERisk Essentials is published every Friday by ERisk.com.
		To subscribe to this newsletter, please register  on our website.
		To unsubscribe, access your  account. Your username is the email address
where you received this  message.
		To be reminded of your password, or to reset it, follow this  link.


State's Power Purchases Costlier Than Projected
Tab is $6 million a day over Davis' requests
Lynda Gledhill, Chronicle Sacramento Bureau
Friday, March 16, 2001
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle

Sacramento -- California has spent about $6 million more a day buying
electrical power than originally projected, according to a confidential
document obtained yesterday by The Chronicle.
State power buyers spent $2.7 billion between Jan. 17 and March 11, averaging
$49 million a day. That amounts to about $6 million a day more than lawmakers
figured using Gov. Gray Davis' appropriations requests.
The confidential document was prepared by the Department of Water Resources,
which purchases power on behalf of the state. It was handed to a group of
lawmakers in a subcommittee hearing Wednesday by Water Resources Director Tom
Hannigan.
To the public, the document presents the first day-by-day look at how much
California is spending on power purchases.
Although the document shows more money being spent than originally believed,
it didn't startle any of the handful of senators and Assembly members who saw
it.
"I don't think it was a surprise," said Assemblyman Dick Dickerson, R-
Redding.
Although the state is supposed to recoup the money spent on electricity,
analysts and lawmakers say the open spigot on the state's treasury could
jeopardize the state budget and fiscal well-being in the short and long term.
For example, the state's power spending could jeopardize new education
programs and transportation projects. The nonpartisan Legislative Analyst
warned last month that lawmakers shouldn't count on all the new projects in
Davis' proposed budget.
Also, California has already been placed on a watch list by several credit
rating firms, because of the deep debt that could be incurred in helping the
utilities become financially stable. The watch list typically precedes a
credit rating drop, which would cause the state's interest on bonds and loans
to rise.
"This (power purchasing) has a dampening effect," said Jean Ross, executive
director of the California Budget Project, an independent policy group that
tracks state spending. "Nobody knows where the economy is going, and how the
energy crisis will affect it, so no one will know what the revenues will look
like in the future."
The biggest day of power buying happened on Feb. 16 when the state spent
nearly $81 million for electricity, or $435 per megawatt hour. The smallest
day was March 10 when the state buyers spent $40 million, or $219 per
megawatt hour.
Michael Worm, an analyst with the investment firm Gerald Klauer Mattison &
Co., said what the state paid was in line with current energy prices.
"That's where energy prices more or less have been for quite some time," he
said. "Of course, they are dramatically higher than they used to be."
The governor's office has refused to release information on how much the
state has spent, said Steve Maviglio, Davis' spokesman. Maviglio said if
generators found out how much the state spent the day before, they could
force up the price the next day.
But Assemblyman Tony Strickland, R-Thousand Oaks, said the public had a right
to know how its money way being spent.
"People need to know exactly what it is costing to keep the lights on," he
said. "We want to know the whole story -- not just pieces."
Strickland, along with media organizations including The Chronicle, have
filed public records act requests to obtain information on how much the state
has spent, along with the details of long-term power contracts signed by
Davis.
The original bill that authorized the state to purchase power appropriated
only $500 million, but allowed the governor to use up to $10 billion if
needed for power purchases by notifying lawmakers. The governor's office has
sent five letters since Feb. 5 to lawmakers notifying them that additional
money was needed.
Based on these letters, which in total have requested an additional $2.5
billion, the news media and lawmakers estimated that the state was spending
$43 million a day -- $6 million less than the actual costs shown on the Water
Resources document.
Since the state began purchasing electricity, the health of its budget has
become dependent on a variety of things to come, making it as fragile as a
house of cards.
The money spent on power is taken from the state's general fund and is
supposed to be returned through the issuance of state bonds. The bonds will
be paid for with a portion of the rates that utility customers pay every
month.
-
Tell Us What You Think Can you save 20 percent on your energy usage? Gov.
Gray Davis is offering rebates for Californians who save on power starting in
June, and if you've got a strategy for conserving, The Chronicle wants to
hear it. Contact the Energy Desk, San Francisco Chronicle, 901 Mission St.,
San Francisco, CA 94103; or e- mail energysaver@sfchronicle.com.
--
E-mail Lynda Gledhill at lgledhill@sfchronicle.com.
Paying for Power
These charts show what the state spent for electricity on the spot market and
the average price paid. For the time frame of Jan. 17 through Feb. 14, only
periodic totals and averages were given.
Period             Amount spent
9 p.m. Jan. 17
through Jan. 18      $13,595,121
Jan. 19 - 29         399,000,000
Jan. 29 - 31         136,546,472
Feb. 1 - 12          495,755,000
Feb. 12 - 14         152,087,316
 Chronicle Graphic

,2001 San Francisco Chronicle ? Page?A - 11


Dear Tracy

Thank you for shopping gap.com. Your order confirmation number is
3878945. Print out this page or write this number down, in case
you have any questions.

Here is a summary of your order:

------------------------------------------------------------------------

ORDER #: 3878945  RECEIVED AT: 2001-10-19 14:04:00

------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Shipment #1 to:
 Tracy  Geaccone
 3811 Northwestern
 Houston, TX 77005

 Description                   Size       Color              Qty Price
------------------------------ ---------- ------------------ --- -------

the Big Oxford (short-sleeved) M          white                1 $16.50
easy fit jeans (adjust waist)  10 Husky   antiqued             1 $24.50
easy fit khakis (adjust waist) 10 Husky   navy                 2 $49.00
big oxford checked             M          orange               1 $9.99

------------------------------------------------------------------------

As soon as your order is shipped (pending credit authorization), we will
send you a separate shipment notification via email.

If you would like to check the current status of your order please click
below.
https://www.gap.com/asp/Order_Status_Lookup.asp

You will now receive email updates from gap.com on the latest styles,
sales, special offers, and events. Please note: If you have changed your
email preferences to "never" receive emails, you will not receive
updates.

If you'd rather not receive email updates from gap.com, you can delete
your name from our email list by clicking here:
http://gap.m0.net/m/u/g.asp?e=tracy.geaccone%40enron.com
(If you make a purchase at gap.com, you will receive order and shipping
confirmation emails.)

If you have any questions, please email us at custserv@gap.com, or call
us at 1.800.GAP.STYLE.

Thanks again for your order,

gap.com Customer Service


Attached you will find the weekly report for the week ending of July 27, 2001.

Saludos


Shark--

I see you referenced Fort Union below, therefore these e-mails to Chris are concerning a well in the Powder River?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Chris Kennedy" <CKENNEDY@patinaoil.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 9:03 AM
To:	Whitt, Mark
Cc:	Bump, Dan J.; Lucci, Paul T.; Bart Brookman
Subject:	Re: FW: Patina Oil & Gas Docs.

Thanks..

We should know something about the well we are currently reentering next week.  Timing on the gathering line is still uncertain.

>>> "Whitt, Mark" <Mark.Whitt@ENRON.com> 10/23 8:33 AM >>>

These are draft versions of the interruptible purchase agreement and
confirm for your gas into Fort Union.  Think about what you what to do
for term, volume etc.  We will then add in the gathering charges.  We
are pretty flexible, so let me know what works for Patina.

Thanks,

Mark

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Nemec, Gerald
> Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 4:14 PM
> To:	Whitt, Mark
> Cc:	Perlingiere, Debra
> Subject:	Patina Oil & Gas Docs.
>
>  <<Patina Oil  Gas Confirm.doc>>  <<Patina Oil  Gas.doc>>

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


FYI -

I've had a few requests for changes to and enhancements of the EOL Download sheet. Dan Maxwell - of the 4th floor IT group - sent me those changes today. The download now allows you to sort by delivery point, or by hour, and has an added "refresh" feature. The date has also been reformatted to fit into our inc sheets (two digit instead of four digit year). Most importantly, the query now pulls in inter-desk swaps done on EOL.

The new EOL download is saved in p://real time/increment/windows 2000/NEW EOL DOWNLOAD

The sheet is still very basic and self-explanatory, so if you have anything to add, or questions about how to use it, please let me know.

Kate Symes
Real Time Trading Support
Office/503-464-7744
Cell/503-819-2181
Fax/503-464-7996


Sorry it took so long.  I believe this was the last email I sent out.

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 01/20/2000 08:49
PM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
09/23/99 12:34 PM
To: Vivien Pham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba A Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mechelle Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary
Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Oliver/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Enron Louisiana Mtg. 8/3

Please wire $584,689.36 to Enron Corp for the Elec settlement.

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 09/23/99 12:32
PM ---------------------------
From: David Oliver on 09/23/99 07:54 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Enron Louisiana Mtg. 8/3

No!

Chris Germany
09/22/99 06:12 PM
To: David Oliver/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Enron Louisiana Mtg. 8/3

And the anwser is???
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 09/22/99 06:14
PM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
09/02/99 04:09 PM
To: Mark Friedman/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Oliver/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mechelle Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vivien
Pham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba A Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Oliver/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Enron Louisiana Mtg. 8/3

Mark, David;
Enron Corp is expecting 590,609.20 ($463,609.20 + $127,000.00) from ECT.
Scott Neal wants to see what impact, if any, this will have on the East Desk
P&L.  I'm hoping we didn't show any of this as East Desk revenue.

Summary
Earlier this year, ECT received a credit from Transco in the amount of
$463,609.20.  This credit was the result of reallocations on Enron
Louisiana's PVR replacement contract for 9612 and 9701 production months.
ECT nominated the replacement gas and paid all transport expense associated
with this contract.  Scott Neal has agreed to pass this money on to
corporate.  The net effect to ECT is $0.00.  Enron Corp is also expecting
$127,000.00.  This is for a similar adjustment ECT received in 1997 that was
written off on 1998 (see below).  The actual amount for the 1997 adjustment
is $121,080.16.

Enron Corp has had a $600,000.00 receivable (from Transcanada) on their books
since Enron Louisiana was sold to Transcanada.  Enron Corp and Transcanada
thought Transco was going to send the credits to Transcanada instead of ECT.

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 09/02/99 03:34
PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Vivien Pham                           09/02/99 08:57 AM

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba A Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mechelle Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vivien
Pham/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Enron Louisiana Mtg. 8/3

Chris,

In order for the I/C imbalance between ECT and ELEC be resolved by August
month-end close,  a wire or check made payable to Co.366 needs to be prepared
by the end of this week.

Please advise me the amount that needs to be made so that I can prepare a
manual wire/check this week.  I'll contact Inez Haberl regarding the payee's
bank information.

Thanks,
Vivien
X3-9558
---------------------- Forwarded by Vivien Pham/HOU/ECT on 09/01/99 06:24 AM
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Vivien Pham                           08/19/99 10:04 AM

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba A Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mechelle Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary
Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vivien Pham/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Enron Louisiana Mtg. 8/3

The offsetting dollar amount for the 9612 production adjustment
(K#016-21045-306C) was $121,080.16.  This adjustment however was reversed
from Enron Louisiana's account and reclassed to Enron Liquid Services in
11/97 GL and subsequently written off in 01/98 GL at the time the company was
sold.  I do have a copy of the write off entry at my desk should you need it.

I've discussed with Darron regarding the difference between the amount we are
going to make to Co.366 ($463,609.20) and the actual dollars in the system
($498,824.82).  He thought it would be better for audit trail purpose to
write off this difference since the volume in the system is correct.

Chris, please let me know when to prepare the wire/check to Co.366 and what
the amount would be.  Thanks,

Vivien
X3-9558

Melba A Bowen
08/04/99 11:26 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Gary Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vivien
Pham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mechelle Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Enron Louisiana Mtg. 8/3

The 9612 production adjustment received from Transco was a reduction in
volume of (33,517).  There was a ($2,734.99) Commodity adjustment and a
($124,582.69) Cash Out adjustment for a total credit from Transco of
($127,317.68).  ECT took this credit.  This volume adjustment was entered in
the sales system in 10/97 reducing the sales volume to Enron Louisiana from
284,890 to 251,373 on K#016-21045-306C.  I don't know what the offsetting
dollar amount would be for the sales adjustment but someone in Client
Services should be able to get this info.

Chris Germany
08/04/99 03:01 PM
To: Gary Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vivien
Pham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mechelle Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba A Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Friedman/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Enron Louisiana Mtg. 8/3

I spoke with Tracy Geaccone after our meeting yesterday.  Tracy is expecting
to receive about $590,000.00, the $463,609.20 we discussed in yesterday's
meeting plus a $127,000.00 adjustment we processed  in mid to late 1997.

Melba told me this morning that  the $127,000.00 was for a 9612 production
month adjustment.  What I need to know is how this adjustment was applied to
Enron Louisiana's account, did we 1) write it off, 2)  pass it through to
some other Enron entity via check, wire transfer, or journal voucher or 3)
cut a check to Trans Canada?  Who do I talk to about this?

Also, Inez Habel (works for Tracy) said the money should go to company 366.
Gary, Darron, I believe someone in your group should probably talk to Inez.
Her extension is 3-7720.

Next question, should we pass on the $463,609.20 to Tracy or should we wait
until we find out what happened to the $127,000.00?  I believe it depends on
how long it will take to research the $127,000.00.

Comments, Questions?

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 08/04/99 01:17
PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Cecilia Olvera                           08/02/99 09:27 AM

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sherry
Anastas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vivien Pham/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mechelle Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Melba A Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Mtg. 8/3

At the request of Melba Bowen the following meeting has been set:

To discuss the handling of funds due Enron Louisiana as the result of
reallocations on Transco.
Date:  Tuesday, August 3rd
Time:  3 p.m.
Location:  EB37C1

If you have a scheduling conflict , you can reach me at X36890.  If you have
a question regarding this meeting you can reach Melba at X35004.

Thanks,
Cecilia


Sushi on Thursday at the new place in the Village?


Every cheerful little deal has a sticky point.  On the PacifiCorp-EEI
journey, we have finally stumbled onto ours.  They like Option A for closeout
setoff, which limits everything to just the parties,  no affiliates and no
other agreements.  We like Option  B which brings in the whole universe.
They justify their position in a very confident manner by just assuming that
any attorney worth his salt would just automatically know that as a REGULATED
UTILITY they just can't go to Option B.  Then, they turn to me and say:
"Christian, we thought you would know this.  How do you justify your position
with PGE?"  At which point I act like it is no problem at all, but do not
offer a reason.  We are going to have to get into the reasons with these
guys.  Is there any regulated utility reason why we cannot use the broader
setoff approach?  Please help me think about this and Steve, prehaps someone
at your former firm could guide us here. ----cgy


Tom,

I have energy estimates for May 2002 attached. Graph 1 is site totals, graph
2 is (total lost)/(total actual production) where total actual production is
taken from the kWh reported in the owner report, and graph 3 is the by
turbine distribution (using box plots) of energy lost.

The energy lost estimation method I employed is susceptible to problems with
data recovery (10-minute data), which in May 2002 was especially poor at
Klondike and Fenner, so those number are not as informative as those for the
other sites.

If these graphs provide you the information you need, I will continue with
the remaining months (Jan - Apr). Otherwise let me know and we'll refine this
process to get you what you need.

Mark


Tim said you were having a problem using our harvester to get
companys/entities' ATC that aren't complying with FERC's OASIS requirements.
Tim suggested that I help you resolve this.  Could you make me a list of
companies/entities that aren't complying?  Then we could discuss how to
address the problem with each company/entity.

Tim suggested that, to the extent we want companies to comply, we could call
them and ask them to comply.  If they don't I suggested we could call the
FERC hotline on a confidential basis.


Rodney B. Lewis
General Counsel
rod.lewis@gric.nsn.us


_________________________________________________________________

WEEKEND SYSTEMS AVAILABILITY

FOR

2/1/2002 5:00:00 PM through 2/4/2002 12:00:00 AM
_________________________________________________________________

Impact:   Corp
Time:   Sat 2/2/2002 5:30:00 PM CT thru Sat 2/2/2002 7:30:00 PM CT
	Sat 2/2/2002 3:30:00 PM PT thru Sat 2/2/2002 5:30:00 PM PT
	Sat 2/2/2002 11:30:00 PM London thru Sun 2/3/2002 1:30:00 AM London
Outage:   Maintenance of NAHOU-SQUFY04S & 05S
Environments Impacted:   Estate Unify Production.
Purpose:   Preventive maintenance on two cluster member servers.
Backout:   None
Contact(s):   Skinner, Tony  713-345-9334
	Jordan, Mark  713-286-5308
	Warner, John  713-345-1756

Impact:   EES
Time:   Fri 2/1/2002 3:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 2/1/2002 11:00:00 PM CT
	Fri 2/1/2002 1:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 2/1/2002 9:00:00 PM PT
	Fri 2/1/2002 9:00:00 PM London thru Sat 2/2/2002 5:00:00 AM London
Outage:   Upgrade EESHOU-DBRGS from NT 40 to W2K server
Environments Impacted:   SQL database
Purpose:   Server needs to be upgraded to windows 2000 and SQL 2000 to meet corp standards
Backout:   Restore original configuration from tape backup
Contact(s):   Nguyen, James  713-345-6137

Impact:   Corp
Time:   Thur 1/31/2002 5:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 2/1/2002 7:00:00 AM CT
	Thur 1/31/2002 3:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 2/1/2002 5:00:00 AM PT
	Thur 1/31/2002 11:00:00 PM London thru Fri 2/1/2002 1:00:00 PM London
Outage:   Replace disk on Envision
Environments Impacted:   Corporate-wide applications accessing the Envision web query, FileNet Panagon IDM Desktop, FileNet IDM for R3, Panagon Capture professional. Users will be able to access IBuyit and IPayit from SAP but will not be able to view invoices.
Purpose:   Maintenance is needed to repair bad disk
Backout:   None
Contact(s):   Vollmer, Mary  713-853-3381
	Rye, Gregory  713-345-3022

Impact:   Corp
Time:   Sat 2/2/2002 6:00:00 AM CT thru Sat 2/2/2002 9:00:00 AM CT
	Sat 2/2/2002 4:00:00 AM PT thru Sat 2/2/2002 7:00:00 AM PT
	Sat 2/2/2002 12:00:00 PM London thru Sat 2/2/2002 3:00:00 PM London
Outage:   Reindex Envision database
Environments Impacted:   Corporate-wide applications accessing the Envision web query, FileNet Panagon IDM Desktop, FileNet IDM for R3, Panagon Capture professional. Users will be able to access IBuyit and IPayit from SAP but will not be able to view invoices.
Purpose:   Maintenance needed to correct performance issues
Backout:   None
Contact(s):   Vollmer, Mary  713-853-3381
	Rye, Gregory  713-345-3022


FYI
Jessie J. Knight Jr. <<RE Press Conference.htm>>
President & CEO
San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce

 - RE Press Conference.htm


What's the website you bought the Adirondack chairs off of.  We are looking
to pick up a couple more.

KR


Jeff,

We will definitely need a lot more information related to the items below.
Please let me know when we can meet and discuss these.  Some of the items we
will need to know include:

We discussed discrepancies your team noted between the spreadsheet positions
that are being captured and what's reported on the Gas BM report.  This is
causing you to manually adjust the Gas BM report.  Is this for all
spreadsheet positions?  Some of them?  Is the variance significant?  Is it
off everyday?
What do you mean by " All Transport Models".   Does this mean positions?  Are
transport positions on the Gas BM report?  Are they manual adjustments?  Are
they in GRMS?  Can we capture these with spreadsheets?
What is your current methodology in preparing the Gas BM report for
roll-offs?  Is it currently consistent across all regions or is it handled
differently by different traders?  Please explain this in further detail. The
Basis roll-off was done in the GRMS system in the past.  Is this still the
case?  If not, we need to capture these roll-off adjustments using
spreadsheets?
Can we make the Fixed Price Canadian Deals adjustments using spreadsheets
that can be captured in GRMS?
Also, what is the status of capturing IM-Canada positions in the system?

We will need this type of information urgently.  We are meeting with Jeff
Shankman on Tuesday to update him on the progress we are making.

Please let me know if there is anything we can do to help.

Thanks,
Mike

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Jeffrey C Gossett                           06/07/2000 05:26 PM

To: Michael E Moscoso/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan
Harrison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sunil Dalal/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Vladimir
Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Spreadsheets and other Data

Spreadsheets :
(in Quark)
EES_Dublin
NG_Opt
Pipe_Opt_date
Storage_opt_date

All Transport models:
East
West
Central

Manual Adjustments:
Spreadsheets
Fixed Price Canadian Deals
Roll Off

Let me know if you need anything further.

Thanks

JG


Two days have gone and past manty times sice I requested the procedure for returning DVDs from your company that I did not order nor desire.  Please have a representitive call me or e-mail, quickly!  If you do not I shall take further action, due to, your company charging me for product that I have not requested.

Don Baughman
281-787-0029

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	dvd <dvd@columbiahouse.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Saturday, October 13, 2001 3:39 PM
To:	Baughman Jr., Don
Subject:	Your message was received.  (KMM8690369C0KM)

========================================================
Message Receipt Confirmation
========================================================

Thank you for contacting us!

-------------------------------
Message Reference Number: 2898128
Subject: Returns~
Received: 10/13/01, 03:36:PM
-------------------------------

We appreciate your patience -- we're making every effort to respond to
your e-mail as soon as possible .  Due to the volume of email messages
we receive, please allow 2 business days for a response should one be
necessary.

Thanks again!
Customer Service


Tom,

FYI, Sally has changed her plans slightly - She will now be back in the
office Monday morning (7/31).

Patti

Thomas D Gros@ENRON
07/26/2000 07:36 AM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Key Contacts - Out of Office - July 26-28, July 31 and August 1

Thanks for the info.  If you'd like to see the logo the team selected, you
can go to luminant.com.  Hit login (upper right corner) and go to userid
(tgros) and password (commoditylogic). Touch the "look and feel" icon and see
the logos.  We selected the first one  in row A.
Enjoy the college hunting!


Want to join me?
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/11/2001 02:48
PM ---------------------------

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 04/11/2001 02:45:17 PM
To: "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: Conference Call

Kay:

That's fine.  I'll let Greg know.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King;& Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>
;

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 2:46 PM
To: Campbell, Carolyn
Subject: Re: Conference Call

Thanks for writing - I deleted your message and then hopped on another
conference call.  How about 330?

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 04/11/2001 02:38:35 PM

To:   "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>,
      "'carlos.sole@enron.com'" <carlos.sole@enron.com>
cc:   "Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com>

Subject:  Conference Call

Kay:

Per my voice mail, Greg Lang wanted to schedule a call for 3:00 central
time
today to raise something that the lenders brought up.  Please advise if you
are available, or if not, what time would be convenient later today.  Greg
says it should be a 15 minute call.  Thanks.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not
the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 02/08/2001 08:54
AM ---------------------------

	From:  ENA Public Relations                           02/08/2001 12:30 AM

Sent by: Enron Announcements
To: All_ENA_EGM_EIM
cc:

Subject: EnTouch Newsletter

BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS

East Power Group
The East Power Group is off to another strong start in 2001.  The realignment
of the group into regional business units with joint trading, mid-marketing,
and origination operations has proven to be a catalyst for deal flow,
producing both a high volume of transactions and high value.  More
transactions were executed in January than any month last year, including one
deal that will bring tremendous strategic value to Enron as well.

Executed in January, was the purchase of two 35 MW coal-fired cogeneration
facilities located in southeastern North Carolina.  ENA will supply steam to
the industrial host, Alamac Knit Fabrics, and will sell power into the
merchant market.  The plants are inside Carolina Power & Light's service
territory, which is connected to AEP, Virginia Power, Duke, SCEG and SCPSA.
These plants are the first purely merchant facilities in North Carolina.
This deal exemplifies how Enron leverages its talent in that originators from
the East Power Group and Industrial Markets Group joined forces to bring this
deal to execution.  They also leveraged the Global Markets group to manage
the coal supply and emissions issues.

Prospects going forward look promising as a number of high value transactions
are in the pipeline.  Of particular note is The Sandhill Power Project, a 180
MW peaking facility currently under construction in Austin.  The facility is
scheduled to come online in June, in time for the advent of deregulation in
Texas. The joint venture, between EPMI and Austin Energy, will provide both
trading groups with a highly flexible asset, enabling them to access
real-time volatility while hedging existing obligations.

Additionally, the Fort Pierce (Florida) City Council voted 5 to 0 in favor of
Enron's proposal to repower the Ft. Pierce Utilities Authority's (FPUA)
existing power plant in that city.  Our proposed 180 MW facility will be used
to produce steam to power the H.D. King facility at approximately 20 percent
less cost than FPUA can produce it.  According to FPUA officials, this
reduction in cost may lead to reduced rates for their ratepayers.  The
planned in-service date is summer of 2002.

Industrial Markets
EIM Fundamental Analysis Group grows again!  The Fundamental Analysis Group
continues to expand its staff and capabilities.  They will be introducing you
to specific activities in the weeks to come, but would like to introduce you
to the new staff members who have joined in the past month.

On the paper/pulp/lumber side, Bin Wang is responsible for supporting the
lumber group; Adnan Patel will be assisting with newsprint and structured
transactions.

For the steel group, Doug Parsons and Yana Kristal are providing market
analysis and econometric/price forecasting support.  Our latest recruit,
David Maxwell, is assisting with the evaluation of a customer management
system and developing analytical databases for all product lines. A visible
enhancement to the group,s operations has been the Intranet web site, which
has been in development for the past three months.  The site will be
transferred to a production server by the end of February.  The site contains
all types of industry, market, regulatory, analytical, and financial
information for deal analysis.

Another major development is the adoption of a customer information
management system.  EIM is currently evaluating Siebel Systems, a software
provider that has developed this type of information tool for EES.

IN THE NEWS

Enron has been named the "Most Innovative Company in America" for the sixth
consecutive year by Fortune.  That's right -- six years in a row.   We
continue to be recognized by our industry peers and other corporate
executives and securities analysts as the company that sets the standard for
doing business in the new economy.  Congratulations to all of you for making
it happen.

Enron placed No. 18 overall on Fortune's list of the nation's 535 "Most
Admired Companies," up from No. 36 last year.  We also were ranked among the
top five in "Quality of Management," "Quality of Products/Services" and
"Employee Talent."

This issue of Fortune is now available in airports and will be on newsstands
Monday, Feb. 12.  For more information, go to www.fortune.com.

NUGGETS & NOTES

"The revolution has begun......"  - Ted Bland, Director/HR Recruiting
Operations

"We trade propane and propane accessories" - Adam Gross, Director/Global LPG
Trading-EGM

WELCOME
New Hires
EGM - Robert Beyer, Jacqueline Darrah, Herbert Goodwin, Vera Ilyina, Tracy
James, Christopher Mulcahy, LaBricia Seyrus
ENA - Tonya Dennis, Kathryn Sheppard, Bin Wang

LEGAL STUFF

The information contained in this newsletter is confidential and proprietary
to Enron Corp. and its subsidiaries.  It is intended for internal use only
and should not be disclosed.


Edmund,

Below is the standard information we always have in every email when we get a
master swap agreement executed.  With this email Global Counterparty can open
the counterparty. We then immediately send the master swap agreement and
other documentation down in the attached memo.    If we get the master in
signed but we're waiting on critical additional documentation  (like the
guaranty or perhaps a legal opinion on a governmental) we hold off on sending
the email.  Sometimes the file may not be complete because we are waiting on
incumbency certificates (which we do not consider critical in most
circumstances) so we may send the email, send down whatever executed
documentation we have, while we wait on the certificates.  We used to wait to
send the executed documents down until we had the whole package completed,
but they can't approve the counterparty without getting the master.  Does
this make sense?...

I am now going to look for one with special instructions...

Below is my standard memo to Global Contract with any kind of executed
documents I send down to them.  Also, a new procedral thing that is evolving
here in Houston, we used to send Global Contracts the originally executed
guarantees, but Credit is not the gatekeeper and recordkeeper of all
guarantees so we will be sending the originals to them in the future (with a
copy in the Global Contract file)

----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 06/01/2000 10:56 AM -----

	Susan Flynn
	04/22/2000 10:52 AM

		 To: Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laurel Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea R
Guillen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, David P Dupre/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Chris Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jarrod Cyprow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pamela
Sonnier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheetal Patel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean Bell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry
Bucalo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Charlie Hoang/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, William
S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nidia
Mendoza/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rod
Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tracy Ngo/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tracy Ngo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly
Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin P Radous/HOU/ECT@ECT, Veronica
Espinoza/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron@Enron, Marie
Heard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marilyn Colbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Yolanda
Cordova-Gilbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane Ellstrom/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lynn E
Shivers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Willie Harrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect,
Jason Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anthony Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie
Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice
Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Connie Sutton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Willie Harrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anthony Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carrie
Southard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amber Ebow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adnan
Patel/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: The Tranzonic Companies

 We have received the following executed Master Agreement:

Type of Contract: ISDA Master Agreement (Multicurrency-Cross Border)

Effective Date:  March 21, 2000

Enron Entity:  Enron North America Corp.

Counterparty:  The Tranzonic Companies

Transactions Covered: Approved for all products except:   weather, pulp and
paper, and foreign exchange.


Doc -

I'll be in town through Sunday morning.  Any chance we can get together for
dinner Saturday eve.?

Mark


This is on the horizon, so I thought I would let you know.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 07/24/2000 06:47
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kay Mann                           07/24/2000 10:06 AM

To: Lisa Bills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Matthew Berry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roseann
Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Herman Manis/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey M
Keenan/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: VEPCO/FYI

I'm working with the commerial team on on PPA (and associated transactions)
for Virginia Power.  The project involves the construction of  a peaker to
supply some/most of the power, with the ability to supply from the market as
well.  The plant has an 01 service date, so things are really picking up.

Matt and Herman, this is the transaction we discussed with Heather a few
weeks ago.

Items on the immediate to do list include:

Executing a land option agreement
Closing on the land (or assign to City of Rocky Mount, and let them close)
Selling/transferring the land to the City of Rocky Mount; negotiate long term
lease
Negotiating a PILOT agreement (payment in lieu of taxes) with the City
Negotiating fuel supply agreements
Selecting/contracting with EPC contractor - can it be NEPCO?
Long lead equipment purchases (?) - could be home for LM 6000's, but other
equipment may be needed
Negotiate interconnection agreement

This deal is showing a lot of life, so I thought it might be helpful to give
you a heads up.

Kay


This FRIDAY, DECEMBER 8, 2000 (5:00 p.m. CST) is the deadline for deferral
program enrollment.  Following the deadline, no new elections or changes to
existing elections will be accepted.
To learn more about your deferral program opportunities and to enroll for
2001 deferrals, access eHRonline at http://ehronline.enron.com.  (Call the
ISC Help Desk at 713-345-4727 if you need your ID or password to access the
system.)

1. Review the program descriptions (attached to the Election Form) before you
make your elections.
2. If you decide to defer compensation, complete the Election Form before
Friday, December 8,  2000, 5:00 p.m. CST (the enrollment deadline).
3. Print your 2001 Election Form and Confirmation Statement right from the
web site and you,re   finished!

DEFERRAL ENROLLMENT 2001--ADDED VALUE FOR YOUR FUTURE


Dear All,

We are preparing to file Form 4s for transactions in the month of October.
Our records indicate that you did not have any transactions in Compaq stock
[other than possible purchases of Compaq stock through the ESPP or 401(k)
plan].  If this is true, then you do not need to do anything.

If this assumption is incorrect, please email me by the end of the day on
Tuesday, December 5 with transactions for open market trades, stock option
exercises, deferred compensation or 401(k) exchanges (including purchases
from dividend reinvestments), gifts, shares held by family members or
trusts in which you have a controlling interest, etc.  If you have any
questions please call me at 281-518-2189 or Linda at 281-514-1433.

 Regards,

Connie Levo
Corporate Law Group  ll773
Compaq Computer Corporation
20555 SH 249
Houston, Texas  77070
Phone:  281-518-2189
Fax:  281-518-1058
Internet:  Connie.Levo@compaq.com


Llano Forecast:
Llano, TX
Last updated Thursday, August 30, at 2:58 AM Central Daylight Time (Thursday 3:58 AM EDT)

Forecast
Today: Mostly cloudy with scattered showers and thunderstorms. High near 84F. Winds S 5 to 10 mph. Chance of precipitation 50%. Rainfall around a quarter of an inch. Locally heavier amounts possible.

Tonight: Partly cloudy with scattered showers and thunderstorms. Low near 71F. Winds mainly S to SE less than 5 mph. Chance of precipitation 50%. Rainfall amounts near a quarter of an inch. Locally heavier amounts possible.

Tomorrow: Variably cloudy with isolated thunderstorms. High near 85F. Winds S 5 to 10 mph. Chance of precipitation 30%. Rainfall amounts near a quarter of an inch.

Tomorrow night: Partly cloudy with a slight chance of a thunderstorm. Low around 71F. Winds S to SE 5 to 10 mph. Chance of precipitation 30%.

Saturday: Partly cloudy with isolated thunderstorms. Highs in the low 90s and lows in the low 70s.

Sunday: Partly cloudy with scattered thunderstorms ending late and becoming clear. Highs in the low 90s and lows in the upper 60s.

Monday: Partly cloudy with isolated thunderstorms. Highs near 90 and lows in the upper 60s.
-----Original Message-----
From: SCOTT TICHAVSKY [mailto:STICHAVSKY@PCT-INC.COM ]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 10:25 AM
To: Travis Baughman; Scott Michal; Rodney Hardegree; Jay Purdom; Don
Baughman; David Kubala
Subject: Fw: This Weekend
This is a message I got from Joe yesterday about Saturday night.  It makes
me no difference if ya'll want to go out for an evening on the town.  Sounds
good to me.  Some of us are heading over to Roger Creager at Garden in the
Heights Thursday evening.  I don't know if we really need to meet to discuss
the weekend or not.  I am handling all of the food for the weekend and the
only other issue is who is riding with who.  Jay is taking his Expedition.
We are leaving from my house Friday afternoon.  So, Don, Travis and Gerald
will be coming from the Clear Lake area and I guess are planning on riding
together.  The question is do ya'll want to meet us at my house?  I have a
map I can fax over or you can look up where we are staying on the internet
and get directions.  The web-site is willowcreekranchtexas.com.  There are
directions on the web-site.  Jay wants to meet tomorrow at the skeet range
off of Westheimer if anyone is interested in doing that.  You can call him
at 281-844-0071  that is his cell. number.  Please read the message below
also.
Scott
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe Ebert" <jebert@eadslink.com>
To: "Scott Tichavsky" <stichavsky@pct-inc.com>
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 5:57 PM
Subject: This Weekend
> Scotty,
>
> In case you did not know. The Brady Goat Cookoff will be this weekend.
> Brady is about a 45 minute drive from where we are staying.  We went last
> year and the music was great and there were tons of women.
>
> If the group is up to it that may be an option.  We could just bring a
> change of clothes hunting and head out.
>
> Just throwing out ideas.
>
> If we decide to go that route then lets not worry about dinner for
Saturday.
> Send out an e-mail to everyone if you are interested.
>
> Joe
>
>


I have attached a final copy of the Media General Confirmation.


FYI.
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 11/17/2000
05:16 PM ---------------------------

Robert Johnston
11/17/2000 09:15 AM
To: Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Max Yzaguirre/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeffrey A
Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: William Stuart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shane Dallmann/LON/ECT@ECT, Pushkar
Shahi/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ellen Su/Corp/Enron@Enron, Michelle D
Cisneros/HOU/ECT@ECT, Trena McFarland/NA/Enron@Enron, Eric Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Pizzolato/HOU/ECT@ECT, Aaron Armstrong/LON/ECT@ECT, Jurgen
Hess/LON/ECT@ECT, Martina Angelova/LON/ECT@ECT, John Greene/LON/ECT@ECT,
Scott Tholan/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Argentina and Emerging Markets

The crisis in Argentina has a lot of people talking about another emerging
market crisis.  This source believes that such talk is overblown, at least
for now.

RJ

ARGENTINA:THE UNPALATABLE CHOICE AMONG DEFLATING, DEFAULTING OR DEVALUING

Executive Summary
The recession in Argentina is deepening and the government faces painful
choices in addressing it
While the current strategy of deflation is unpopular, default or devaluation
could be even more painful
Deflation will remain the strategy of choice so long as De la Rua survives;
if his government falls, both default
      and devaluation become likely
Mexico and Brazil are in a stronger position to face the fallout from a
devaluation than they were in 1998

November 16, 2000

1. Argentina Recession

The question haunting observers of Argentina is whether the De la R?a
administration will succeed
in stabilizing the country,s economy and pulling it out of its second
recession in five years. Indeed,
the 11-month old administration has not lived up to expectations and is
quickly losing market
confidence. Although the country has so far maintained the support of the IMF
and Washington,
the outcome of the unfolding crisis is by no means certain. Argentina is
trapped in a fixed
exchange regime that succeeded in taming inflation but is now impairing its
competitiveness and
long-term prospects.

2. Deflate, Default, or Devalue?

The administration faces a number of unenviable choices as it tries to reduce
the difference
between internal and external prices. It can continue with its present course
of action, attempting
to cut its fiscal deficit amid a deepening recession and a growing debt
crisis. The adjustment of
relative prices would thus be accomplished through continued deflation. A
variant of this scenario
would be to renegotiate part of its external debt, in order to reduce the
increasingly onerous interest
payments, or default on its sovereign bonds. This, however, would destroy the
last shred of
confidence, jeopardize Argentina,s future access to international capital
markets, and ruin the
country,s relations with major industrialized countries. Finally, the country
could opt to devalue.
Arguably, the financial and social cost of this action would be high, but the
country could recover
relatively quickly, as the cases of Mexico and Brazil suggest.

3. Recession Threatens De la Rua Survival

The outcome will depend on whether the De la R?a administration remains in
power. The
government is committed to pursuing a deflationary adjustment, hoping that it
will pay off by next
year, provided that the US dollar weakens and that its access to
international markets is
maintained. However, if the deflation is more prolonged and the economic
recession becomes
socially and politically untenable, the ruling coalition could disintegrate
and the president could be
forced to resign. In that case, the new government would probably decide to
devalue immediately
after taking power.

4. Brazil and Mexico Less Vulnerable to Contagion than in 1998

The Argentine crisis has raised the specter of emerging market financial
instability, notably in
Brazil and Mexico. However, these fears may be unfounded given the progress
made by the latter
countries in improving their fundamentals. Indeed, both Brazil and Mexico now
feature a floating
exchange rate regime and have gone a long way in terms of balancing their
fiscal accounts. Thus,
in the event of an escalation of Argentina,s difficulties, both countries are
well equipped to
overcome temporary financial turmoil.


Hi team.  Do not discuss this with anyone at CES or EES please.  May not be a
problem but just in case.

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 06/02/2000 11:06
AM ---------------------------

Timothy L Ray@EES
06/02/2000 10:48 AM
To: Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Henderson/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: CES Supply Management Agreement

New Power Company is current working on the acquisition of CES' mass market
customers.  In light of the acquisition, there are issues that surround our
relationship with ENA as we step into the supply management agreement.  Below
are the observations  that I have.  I would like to get you feedback on
these.  If necessary, let's get together to discuss the ramifications.

1) We are purchasing customers within only twelve markets.  As such, we will
only interpret the language of the agreement related to "existing markets" as
applying to only those twelve markets.  For other markets that we conduct
business in, we would choose to make a decision on supplier and load
management even if it is an LDC identified as an existing market under the
agreement.  In essence, we see the supply management agreement being
bi-furcated since CES is selling C&I to another marketer.

2) My interpretation is that New Power Company will only be on the hook for
capacity and storage charges as they apply to mass markets.  This would
include capacity and/or storage allocations received on CVA, CMD, AGL.  In
addition, it would include the FSS and SST purchased on COH.  It would also
include the following transportation agreements: 61822, 61825, 61838, 61990,
64939, 65418, 62164.  There are some capacity agreements on TCO for
CPA(65041, 65042) and BGE(65108) that were purchased by CES for both C&I and
mass markets.  It is our contention that we will only be on the hook for the
demand charges related to the capacity covering mass market purchase
commitments identified in the schedules of the purchase agreement .  All
un-utilized capacity would to stay with CES and/or buyer of the C&I
agreements.

3) We need to discuss the application of the contract to additional capacity
that New Power procures applicable to the periods prior to Apr. 1, 2001.  I
want to keep this capacity separate and under our control.  I will need your
viewpoint on this.  If ENA feels strongly that we must place the capacity
under the supply management agreement, then I would want to discuss our
ability to market any excess capacity in open market.  Bottom-line, I want to
avoid gas costs being inflated due to my inability to receive value for
un-utilized capacity.

4) I would like to get your viewpoint on the right of first refusal clause.
My view would be that its applicable would be made to transactions of similar
nature and service level. (supply management)  To the degree that New Power
chose after the primary term to manage its supply, all supply only
transactions would not be subject to this clause.

I know you will need to review the contract.  We have some time to discuss
these issues, but would like to have feedback from you no later than next
Friday, if at all possible.  I can be reached at ext 39475.  Thanks for your
help.


Hey, you. Sat. Jan 20th is both Jody's and Marco's 32nd birthday. At
about
10:30, we're all going to the Lone Star Saloon at 1900 Travis to get
drunk.
You should come.

Here's a map:
http://albums.photopoint.com/j/ViewPhoto?u=155943&a=11011690&p=38301696

xox,
Al


Oregon State University has sold its entire allotment of tickets for the
January 1 Tostitos Fiesta Bowl! That,s great news for OSU, because it proves
to the nation that our fans will go the distance to support the Beavers in a
big-time bowl game.

Not only will there be thousands of Oregon Staters in Tempe, but there will
also be thousands of things to do. (Well, maybe not thousands of things to
do, but there will definitely be a lot going on() In the hopes of helping you
fill up your Arizona days and nights, the OSU Alumni Association has created
a calendar of events covering everything from College Football,s Largest
Party to educational Alumni Association events to the official pep rally. The
Calendar is located here:
http://alumni.orst.edu/bowlgame_events.html

One of the events that you won,t want to miss is the Tostitos Fiesta Bowl
Block Party on New Year,s Eve. Billed by USA Today as one of the top eight
places in the nation to ring in the New Year, the Block Party will feature
revelry and electrifying fireworks, an abundance of food and beverage
vendors, as well as a carnival of thrilling rides for children and adults
alike. Advance ticket purchase is strongly suggested. Tickets are just $15
and can be purchased from the OSU Alumni Association at (541) 737-2351.

On the day of the game, you,ll definitely want to check out College Football,
s Largest Party. In the spirit of traditional college football tailgaters,
the party is sure to please football fans of all ages. Even more pleasing is
that if you bought game tickets through the Athletic Ticket Office or are an
OSU Official Bowl Tour participant, you can get into the party for free! If
you got your game tickets from another source, you can buy party tickets at
the gate for $15.

You still need tickets to the game?!? There is still hope! Join the Alumni
Association,s Orange and Black Club by noon on Friday, December 15, 2000 and
become eligible for a drawing for two game tickets to the Tostitos Fiesta
Bowl and two tickets to one of the OSU Alumni Association events (to be
determined) in Tempe, Arizona!  This is an incredible value for FREE to the
Orange and Black Club winner! Call today, 866-416-8454! For more information
on Alumni Association membership, click here:
http://osu.orst.edu/dept/alumni/osuaa.html

Don,t forget Fly your Flag Fridays! On each Friday until the Fiesta Bowl, fly
your car flags and house flags, and wear your orange and black!
---
You are currently subscribed to bowlgame as: mark.guzman@enron.com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
leave-bowlgame-1408860L@pluto.sparklist.com


Posted 11/9/01 will expire 12/21/01 5:00pm

Toby

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Watson, Kimberly
Sent:	Friday, November 09, 2001 1:28 PM
To:	Kuehl, Toby
Cc:	Lohman, TK; Y'Barbo, Paul
Subject:	PG&E ROFR

Toby,

Please post these ROFR's on the EBB.  Please call if you have any questions.

Thanks,

Kim.

 << File: ROFR on PG&E.doc >>                << File: ROFR PG&E 2.doc >>


I do not intend to approve reimbursement by the company for attendance.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Saunders, James
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 9:55 AM
To:	Campos, Kathy; Daily, Pamela; Peters, Jerry; Geaccone, Tracy; Brassfield, Morris; Barnes, Caroline; Jesse III, John; Borcyk, David; Cherry, Paul; Konsdorf, Ellen; Chandler, Bob; Cobb Jr., John; Wiederholt, Patricia; Fancler, Dan; Lev, Jennifer; Sutton, Lisa; Gilbert, Steve; Keiser, John; Centilli, James; Rosenberg, David E.; Tu, Denis; Brasher, Barney; Clements, David; Concklin, Elaine; Stern, Ellis; Ratner, Michael; Chavez, Gabriel; Gonzalez, Martin; Lee, Jebong; Schroeder, Maggie
Cc:	Guthrie, Robert; Rice, Greek; Schick, Warren; Tilotta, Robert W; Svatos, Dee; Jolibois, Anne; Mayes, Cynthia; Schaffer, Brian; Jones, Dana; Sullivan, Michael; Baker, Lee; Hayslett, Rod
Subject:	Andersen Oil & Gas Symposium

After Rod's staff mtg. on Friday, we followed up w Andersen on attendance discounts related to the above annual meeting (12/4 and 5).
Andersen indicated no discount...interested attendees would have to pay full amount, $1200.


For the week August 21-25th:

Transwestern's weekly average deliveries to California were 1,042 MMcf/d
while east deliveries averaged 436 MMcf/d.  San Juan lateral averaged 840
MMcf/d while receipts from Rio Puerco averaged 66 MMcf/d.  Window Rock
receipts steadily increased throughout the week from a first of week level of
66 MMcf/d to an end of week level of 117 MMcf/d.    Mojave deliveries were
fairly strong given a range of 50-120 MMcf/d throughout the week.    By
Friday, Transwestern was almost at the 2 BCF/d total throughput level.

El Paso deliveries to California averaged a 57% throughput level of 1,662
MMcf/d:

- PG&ETop (capacity 1,140 MMcf/d) deliveries averaged 530 MMcf/d, down 176
MMcf/d from last Friday

- SoCalEhr (capacity 1,230 MMcf/d) deliveries averaged 613 MMcf/d, down 578
MMcf/d from last Friday

- SoCalTop (capacity 542 MMcf/d) deliveries averaged 519 MMcf/d, similar to
last Friday.

In the week since El Paso's rupture, their total decrease in throughput to
California appears to have averaged approximately 758 MMcf/d.

Other pipeline throughput:

- PGT ( capacity 1,937 MMcf/d) throughput to California averaged 1,886 MMc/d
or 97% throughput.
-  Kern River (capacity 700) throughput to California averaged 384 MMcf/c.

Basis trend for the week:    Progressive and steady widening of the Sept &
Oct Perm-California basis from a .85-.90 first of week spread to an end of
week 2.01 level.

Friday Enron Online Basis numbers:

  Sep.  Oct.  Nov 00-March '01 April-Oct '01
Perm-CA 2.01  2.01   1.40      1.38
SJ - CA  2.90  2.49   1.54      1.62
SJ-Waha .99    .55     .18        .30
Perm-Waha .10    .026     .04        .06


---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Breese/HOU/ECT on 04/25/2001 09:30 AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital Management  From:  Mark Breese                           03/27/2001 02:48 PM

To:	Jin Guo/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	NETBACK MODEL

---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Breese/HOU/ECT on 03/27/2001 02:45 PM ---------------------------

Phil DeMoes@ENRON
03/20/2001 08:31 AM
To:	Mark Breese/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	NETBACK MODEL

Mark,

Les has worked up some economics on transport regarding Elba.  He would like to have some pull down buttons for fuel, zone, gri, etc. to look at different netbacks.  He is continuing to revise this but this is the first start.   Whoever is working on this needs to get an overview from Les and I so they understand what we are looking for.

Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Phil DeMoes/Corp/Enron on 03/20/2001 08:33 AM ---------------------------

Les Webber @ ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

03/20/2001 07:55 AM
To:	Phil DeMoes/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject:	NETBACK MODEL

PHIL:

Here is trhe model we discussed.

I am going to add some sheets this A.M., so if Mark is going to get someone to work on it, the individual should go thru what I have done, determine what improvements can be made, then contact me.  I will send the latest version to them, then they will take over full control.

Regards.
Les


Start Date: 1/16/02; HourAhead hour: 23;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011623.txt
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database


Here's material for this upcoming  week.
?
Bobby
 - NEON Roaring 3.doc


Please find atatched.
Thanks


(See attached file: HPLN0112.xls)

 - HPLN0112.xls


I have advised Rod Sayers of my approval under separate cover

-----Original Message-----
From: Brungs, Ian
Sent: Wed 9/26/2001 5:20 AM
To: Aury, Pierre; Price, Brent A.; Kokenge, Johnna; Shankman, Jeffrey A.; Allen, Melissa; Maley, Paul; Nath, Tani
Cc: Shankman, Jeffrey A.; Krasny, Kenneth; Evans, Mark (London Legal); Sexton, Camille; Juggins, Janine; Horn, Cindy
Subject: Mitsui 2 CACS

Hello All,

Please find attached the CACS from which needs to be approved as soon as possible.  Please send me your acceptance by email (just one per group). All the final documents should have already been sent to you.. If there are any questions please contact me. (0207 783 4084)

Many Thanks

Ian

<<mitsui 2 CACS.doc>>


I agree w/ Mary and made this point earlier.

Mary Hain@ECT
12/12/2000 12:22 PM
To: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Draft Talking points about California Gas market

I'm not sure whether we want Hoecker to make the fourth point.  What do
others think?

To: Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Maureen
McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Draft Talking points about California Gas market

We thought it would be good to basically give Chair Hoecker talking points
with any numbers that Enron provides.  We will visit on these later today
when the numbers are ready (before 3:00).  Comments?
---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 12/12/2000
10:38 AM ---------------------------
From: Leslie Lawner@ENRON on 12/12/2000 11:56 AM
To: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rebecca W
Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ruth Concannon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie
Miller/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jane M
Tholt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Talking points about California Gas market

Here is my stab at the talking points  to be sent in to FERC along with the
gas pricing info they requested for the California markets.  Let me or
Christi know if you have any disagreements, additions, whatever.  I am
supposed to be out of here at 2:15 today, so if you have stuff to add after
that, get it to Christi.  Thanks.


From: Office of Emergency Services

NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE SACRAMENTO CA
0930 AM PDT TUE AUG 07 2001

...FIRE WEATHER WATCH OVER THE CREST AND EAST SIDE OF THE TAHOE
AND ELDORADO NATIONAL FORESTS THIS AFTERNOON AND EVENING THROUGH
WEDNESDAY FOR POSSIBLE DRY LIGHTNING...

FIRE WEATHER ZONES INCLUDED IN THIS WARNING ARE...536...538...541.

DISCUSSION: HIGH PRESSURE RIDGE OVER GREAT BASIN BRINGING UNSTABLE
UPPER LEVEL SOUTHEAST FLOW OVER THE AREA. SIERRA CREST
THUNDERSTORM ACTIVITY MAY MAKE IT THIS FAR NORTH BY THIS AFTERNOON
AND WITH THE LOWER ATMOSPHERE REMAINING VERY DRY...ANY LIGHTNING
WOULD BE DRY. IN ADDITION...HUMIDITIES ARE EXPECTED IN THE TEENS
AGAIN THIS AFTERNOON. THEREFORE A FIRE WEATHER WATCH HAS BEEN
ISSUED FOR THIS AFTERNOON THROUGH WEDNESDAY FOR MAINLY THE HIGHER
ELEVATIONS AND EAST SIDE OF SIERRA CREST.

PLEASE ADVISE THE APPROPRIATE OFFICIALS OR FIRE CREWS IN THE FIELD
OF THIS WATCH.

SMITH

For more information contact:
OES Warning Center at 916-262-1621

EDIS-08-07-01 1057 PDT

---------------------------------------------------------
To update or terminate your subscription to this email service
visit our webpage at http://www.incident.com/edismail.html.

EDIS is operated by the Governor's Office of Emergency Services,
State of California. This email relay is offered by incident.com
as a public service. Because of the complexity of this system and
its dependence on other systems, we cannot be responsible for
delays or failures in transmission.
---------------------------------------------------------


I've given up on the spreadsheet - I couldn't insert the column.  So this is
my allocation.  Would you please update the spreadsheet for these changes and
send me a clean copy?  I want o distribute to my management team for their
records.  Thanks.


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 01/31/2001 07:59 AM -----

	Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>
	01/30/2001 05:04 PM

		 To: Hedy Govenar <hgovenar@govadv.com>, Mike Day <MDay@GMSSR.com>, Bev
Hansen <bhansen@lhom.com>, Jeff Dasovich <jdasovic@enron.com>, Susan J Mara
<smara@enron.com>, Joseph Alamo <JAlamo@enron.com>, Paul Kaufman
<paul.kaufman@enron.com>, David Parquet <David.Parquet@enron.com>, Rick
Johnson <rick.johnson@enron.com>, Marcie Milner <mmilner@enron.com>, Sandra
McCubbin <Sandra.McCubbin@enron.com>, Tim Belden <Tim.Belden@enron.com>, Rick
Shapiro <rshapiro@enron.com>, Jim Steffes <james.d.steffes@enron.com>, Alan
Comnes <acomnes@enron.com>, Chris Calger <ccalger@enron.com>, Mary Hain
<mary.hain@enron.com>, Joe Hartsoe <Joe.Hartsoe@enron.com>, Donna Fulton
<Donna.Fulton@enron.com>, Steven Kean <Steven.J.Kean@enron.com>, Karen Denne
<kdenne@enron.com>, Beverly Aden <beverly.aden@enron.com>, Bill Votaw
<bill.votaw@enron.com>, Carol Moffett <carol.moffett@enron.com>, Debora
Whitehead <debora.whitehead@enron.com>, Dennis Benevides
<dennis.benevides@enron.com>, Don Black <don.black@enron.com>, Dorothy
Youngblood <dorothy.youngblood@enron.com>, "dblack@enron.com"
<dblack@enron.com>, "emelvin@enron.com" <emelvin@enron.com>,
"ehughes2@enron.com" <ehughes2@enron.com>, "gweiss@enron.com"
<gweiss@enron.com>, "gsavage@enron.com" <gsavage@enron.com>,
"Harry.Kingerski@enron.com" <Harry.Kingerski@enron.com>, "kgustafs@enron.com"
<kgustafs@enron.com>, "msmith1@enron.com" <msmith1@enron.com>,
"ryang@enron.com" <ryang@enron.com>, "sgahn@enron.com" <sgahn@enron.com>,
"vsharp@enron.com" <vsharp@enron.com>, "wcurry@enron.com" <wcurry@enron.com>,
"William.S.Bradford@enron.com" <William.S.Bradford@enron.com>, Jim Steffes
<james.d.steffes@enron.com>, Jeff@govadv.com, Dasovich@govadv.com, Mike Day
<MDay@GMSSR.com>, Rick Shapiro <rshapiro@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Update from California Legislature Tuesday 1-30

Note:  Please forward this note to the appropriate people within Enron.
I do not have access to all the email addresses after hours.

Today the special Wright Assembly committee held an infomational hearing
on bankruptcy procedures.  No substantive action.  However, at his
evening briefing Assmblyman Wright said that ABX -18 was now stripped
down to just the "arrearage" language and was only 4 pages.  It should
be out soon.  There is no schedule for a hearing, but the next hearing
will be to vote on  a bill.  Our proposed language on the end of the
rate freeze is under consideration.  Edison has agreed to support our
concept and wants to see a redraft of the language making it explicit
that they can recover past costs in the future.  We will provide a draft
to them tomorrow morning.

The Senate appropriations committee met all day to work over the ABX-1
bill and considered amendments and testimony.  The bill included
amendments suspending all  direct access once the DWR was buying
power.   We have a major problem in that Sen Burton, Bowen, and
Assmblyman Keeley all believe that the DWR will get lower prices and
avoid stranded contract costs in the later years of the contract if
customers are locked into the DWR market.  The witness from NYMEX
described this approach as making sure the state goes broke as soon as
possible.

We offered our amended language to preserve existing and future direct
access to staff.  After the recess the bill had not been amended. I
presented testimony supporting direct access, as did many consumer
groups, UC/CSU, and industrial customers.   The compromise from the
chair was to promis that language would be added to grandfather in
existing direct access contracts which could be retain, renegotiated or
renewed.  However, the CPUC could suspend the right to enter into new
direct access deals.  Sen. Bowen committed to introduce a "clean up"
bill tomorrow which could deal comprehensively with the issue and
perhaps detail the conditions under which customers could choose direct
access in the future.  However, as the bills are not "joined" in
legislative parlance, we have no real assurance that the Bowen bill will
be passed or signed.  We have a major selling job to do in conjunction
with the other ESPs, and customer groups in order to try to get this
fixed.  NEV tried to introduce amendments which would impose very
specific conditions on new direct access, preferring to spell out the
language in the bill  rather than risk getting an adverse decision from
the CPUC.  We indicated our unwillingness to support significant
restrictions on future industrial direct access, and they did not push
the language too hard, but we now have to have Enron get more involved
in determining ARM's position.  Aaron Thomas and Counihan will be
working on this tomorrow in Sacto.  For tomorrow, my suggested action
points are as follows:   Jim Steffes should brief Sue Mara on his
suggestions for managing direct access under the new structure, and she
should try to contact Aaron and Rick, while Sandi and I will do the same
from here.

We will advise you of any other major developments.

Mike Day


Thanks.  That certainly puts things in perspective.


DDechiaro@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:

THIS IS TO CONFIRM THAT IS MEETING WILL TAKE PLACE ON MONDAY, AUGUST 13,
2001.

Marty Amati is requesting a Special BSP Subcommittee Meeting on Monday,
August 13, 2001.

The meeting will be to consider and hopefully approve an Interim Credit
Policy to support the Virtual Bidding Program.

In order to support implementation of the Virtual Bidding Program on
November 1, 2001, it is Critical that the related Credit Policy in Support
of Virtual Bidding be filed with FERC by August 31, 2001.

Following are the details for the meeting:

Date:                    Monday, August 13, 2001

Time:                    9:30 AM until 1:30 PM

Location:           NYISO - Albany Office
                    290 Washington Avenue Extension
                    Albany, NY  12203

Conference Room:    WA

A Call-In Number has been set-up for those of you who are unable to attend.

Dial In Number:          (505) 242-2204

Participant Code:        756138

Materials for this meeting will be provided prior to the meeting.

Coffee/ Muffins and Lunch will be provided.  Please contact Denise DeChiaro
at 518-356-6184 if you plan on attending so the appropriate food and space
arrangements can be made.

PLEASE NOTE:  This meeting DOES NOT take the place of the regular BSP
meeting that is set up for Wednesday, August 29, 2001.  That meeting is
still being held to discuss the update on the 2002 Business Plan, the
Status of the 2001 Budget vs. Actual and the progress of the 2002 Budget
Presentation.

Thank you,
Denise DeChiaro
518-356-6184

Market Relations
518-356-6060


Steve Walton has suggested the following definitions concepts for definitions
of "Congestion Zone" and "Flowpath"

Congestion Zone - Segment of Electric System within which there is minimal
congestion between busses.

Flowpath - A facility or set of facilities that represent commercially
significant constraints within the transmission system.

As we discussed, Steve affirmed that these are terms of art.


Please review the attached agreement for the Big Sandy Interconnect.  It is very standard.  It is reimbursable.  It has a few blanks that have to be filled in for certain dates that we (or Caithness) don't know just at this time with respect to receiving regulatory approval, in-service date, etc.  Caithness wants this agreement for their prospective equity partners to review for content.

Teb, Lee and Ron, this agreement has not changed since you have last seen it, but I just wanted you to give it one more look.

I would like to email to Kirk (Caithness) tomorrow afternoon.

Thanks, Kim.


it's all about the action.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jai Hawker <JHawker@petersco.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 1:12 PM
To:	Richey, Cooper
Subject:	RE: favor

No problem.  I've seen the Scooby Phone when I watered the plants...although
I didn't see it in action.

-----Original Message-----
From: Richey, Cooper [mailto:Cooper.Richey@ENRON.com]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 1:09 PM
To: jhawker@petersco.com
Subject: favor

i need to move my dining room table before monday night when a sofa is
getting delivered.  can you help me out sometime this w/e?  i also want to
show off the scooby phone.

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


I think this should work for the group (including Mark and Shari)

Taffy Milligan
03/09/2000 05:28 PM
To: Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marie
Heard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari
Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Erica Braden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kaye
Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Taffy Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Becky Tlucek/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: SWAP Group Meeting - 3/21/00

I've been asked to coordinate a SWAP Group Meeting when  all the attorneys
will be here.  How does Tuesday, March 21 at 3:00 p.m. work? (EB38c2)  Please
advise, as soon as possible.

Also attached is a revised version of the SWAP Group Calendar for March &
April.


Laura,

Congratulations. Well deserved.

Vince


As is the case will all FT-Ontario deals done at a US point, the deal must
flow physically from a US book eventhough the canadian trader gets the long
term income/loss from the deal.  This is a commercial decision that risk has
to abide by.  The OA group, specifically John Valdes has given Jim Little the
deal numbers in the past that comprise this problem to eliminate repeat
performances.  This deal in question began in 11/00 and since you are doing
december OA I would assume this one has not yet made the list.  I suggest
forwarding to Jim LIttle/John Valdes to eliminate future problems.  Thanks.
PL


Sara:  Attached are EWEB's markup of Enron's response to EWEB's proposed
ISDA Schedule.  As we discusssed, in order to isolate the items that remain
to be resolved, I simply "accepted" all of your modifications and then
redlined items EWEB wants modified or returned to EWEB's original proposal.

Also, in regard to the Confirmations and our discussion regarding their
execution in connection with authorizing Resolution to be considered by the
EWEB Board on December 5th, EWEB proposes the following language be added to
the end of the first paragraph of each Confirmation:  "This Transaction will
become effective and enforceable upon the final approval of its terms by the
EWEB Board of Commissioners and issuance of an authorizing legal opinion by
counsel for EWEB."

As for the remainder the terms of the Confirmation, i.e., the "deemed ISDA"
portion, EWEB requests that you incorporate any proposed changes included in
our redline to the general ISDA Schedule.

Finally, I understand from Dick Varner at EWEB that he is in the process of
arranging a conference call tomorrow regarding the credit arrangements.
Thanks for assisting in setting this up.

-Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com [mailto:Sara.Shackleton@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 3:25 PM
To: Jdeason@chbh.com
Cc: Holli.Krebs@enron.com; Dick.Varner@eweb.eugene.or.us;
bert.dunn@dweb.eugene.or.us; Tracy.Ngo@enron.com; Susan.Bailey@enron.com
Subject: ISDA Master Agreement and Deemed ISDA

Jim:

As a follow up to our conversation of yesterday, please note the following:

(1)  I have not received your comments to our blackline of EWEB's ISDA
Schedule.

(2)  I have not received your suggested language to the Deemed ISDA
confirmation.

Please verify whether or not you emailed these to me yesterday as promised.

Also, Holli Krebs has offered to try to organize a conference call to
discuss the Paragraph 13 to the ISDA Credit Support Annex.  Tracy Ngo from
our credit group and I will be available to answer any questions.   As soon
as we have your comments, I can provide you with a blackline.

Please let me know if there is anything further that I can do.  Thanks.
Sara

 - EWEB Response to Enron Markup of ISDA Schedule 11-28-00.doc


---

Dan and Michelle;

Further to Bruce's note the other day,  could we use something like the
following in the two Enron/CEMC agreements? - to be inserted in Other
Conditions immediately following the para. providing for the 9:45
notification.

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein or in the Enfolio Spot
General Terms and Conditions each party shall, in addition to the other
remedies hereunder, be liable to reimburse the other for any imbalance
charges, loan costs, or similar charges reasonably incurred by the other as
a result of the failure:

a) in the case of Enron, to provide the delivery information required by
9:45 am on each Nomination Day; and

b) in the case of Customer, to forward such information to Alliance Pipeline
on each Nomination Day in a timely manner.