No sleeping on the job.......

MARY COOK
09/27/2000 08:29 AM
To: Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: United Oil & Minerals -Amended Credit W/S

The file was MIA because it was with me at home!!!  However, with all good
intentions, I instead fell asleep!  Tana I will stop by this morning.  Mary

Enron North America Corp.
Mary Cook
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com

	Russell Diamond
	09/27/2000 07:34 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: United Oil & Minerals -Amended Credit W/S

Thanks Tana,

We actually need another redraft, that now corresponds to the worksheet and a
parent guaranty.

Thanks
Russell

From: Tana Jones on 09/26/2000 06:18 PM
To: Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: United Oil & Minerals -Amended Credit W/S

Russell,

I spoke  to the cpy about this, and what it turned out he wanted was the
Local Currency ISDA form.  I gave that redraft to Mary to sign off on the
same day I wrote that note, but she's been too busy to look at it, and the
file is now MIA from her office.  I'll check with her tomorrow and she what
she did with it.

	Russell Diamond
	09/26/2000 05:53 PM

		 To: Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: United Oil & Minerals -Amended Credit W/S

Samantha,
Tana,

I have attached an amended credit worksheet for the referenced counterparty.
This amended worksheet includes a Guaranty from its parent company of $5MM,
thus increasing the collateral threshold to $5MM, and amending other credit
covenants.

Per the Legal Comment in the Master Swap Lotus Notes Database, Tana received
a call from the counterparty requesting a 'less complicated' agreement.  In
the comment, Tana suggested using an Industrial Master, if this agreement is
OK from a Legal standpoint, I am OK using the Industrial from a Credit
standpoint.

Please draft this amended credit worksheet to an amended Industrial Master.

Thank you,

Russell


Wade,  Thanks for bringing this issue to our attention. But I need help
understanding this one.  We have a process already to handle John's behind
the citygate deals

Since, the actual scheduling is done by CES in Virginia,  we never nominate
this gas nor do we see actuals.  We hear about them from John and Terry and
we are supposed to get confirms from the producer and CES.  Whenever one of
these deals occurs, we have buys from the producer and sales to CES to
account for these transactions internally.

It's my understanding that whenever John cuts one of these behind the
citygate deals;  that Terry puts it into Sitara for him.  The offset also
entered by Terry  is a sale to CES (Now the New Power Company effective Sept.
1) with commercial (usually Chris Germany) confirming the sale price.  Angie
schedules it in Unify under CNG and we create, track and balance like usual.

Is that not the case here?  Is this something that's getting reconciled in
Jeanne and Terry's project for CNG???

By cc: Angie, please get with Terry /Jeanne and Chris to help Wade.  THANKS!
Please keep me abreast of the status.

Wade R Price
08/29/2000 02:53 PM
To: Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angie Zeman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gloria G
Barkowsky/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Theresa Franklin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa K
Ratnala/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryce Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, John M Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Phillips Production Co - PNG City Gate Production

ENA is being invoiced by Phillips Production Company for production on
Dominion Transmission (CNG) via Peoples Natural Gas.  This is
behind-city-gate gas that we do not get documents supporting the volumes. I
have invoices and production statements from Phillips.

Per John Singer Notes Mail of 08/23 concerning the July production," Phillips
Production / Peoples: Price:  @ $2.95/Mcf  Term:  1/1/2000 - 11/30/2000 Est.
Volume:  500/MCFD  (Actual Volume will vary.)   I have no way of verifying
the actual volume.  Chris Germany and Angie Zeman will try to get into CES's
PNG pool via E-Script.  This may be the only way to verify actual volumes.  I
have a call into Phillips to see if they might have a pipeline statement
verifying volumes."  Joihn's call to Phillips read partially,  " I just
talked to Sam Fragale @ Phillips.  The 7,843 Mcf @ $2.95 is ENA's. "

Our deals have been using point 20200 on Dominion Transmission (CNG).  Deals
for Jan 00 - Mar 00 were 210359 and 210364.  These were copied to 226543 and
229733 respectively for April 00 forward  Deal 226543 has April 00 only, but
should probably be extended through June-00 according to deal notes from John.
Here is our current status on this gas

Prod  Invoice  Invoice  Current
Month  Volume  Price  Unify Vol Sitara Deal

May-00  4801  @$2.82  163  226543 (has April-00 only, should extend through
June?))
  9748  @$2.95  353  229733

June-00  5341  @$2.82  0  226543 (has April-00 only, should extend through
June?))
  9394  @$2.95  0  229733

July-00  7843  @$2.95  9552  229733

We need to get our proccess together for handling this each month through the
end of the deal terms.

Please direct the appropriate parties to help make these invoiced volumes
available on the deal and in Unify so I can pay Phillips.

Thanks  WRP


Attached is an organizational statistics summary for the first half of 2001.  The HR organization has been working to develop meaningful reporting of trends in our employee population.  A few highlights from this report:

The employee base continues to grow (though on a significantly slower pace than 2000).
Terminations (voluntary and involuntary) are up dramatically this year.
Our "contribution loss" (a statistic which uses terminations weighted by the performance ratings of those leaving) has gone up, indicating that we are losing more high performers than in previous periods.  However, those departures of high performers are concentrated in areas of substantial reorganizations (EBS, the former EE&CC and HPL).
Let us know if you would like to see additional items on the report or if you have questions about the data.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Dozier, Scott
Sent:	Thursday, October 11, 2001 6:20 AM
To:	Lucci, Paul T.
Cc:	Riordan, Sean; Hernandez, Elizabeth L.
Subject:	CMS Deal #1022271

Paul,

We have the above Sep-01 production deal on WIC pipeline in the system under CMS Marketing, Services and Trading Company.  However, the counterparty is billing us under CMS Field Services, Inc.  These two counterparties settle differently.  Please confirm the correct counterparty name if possible.

Thank you,
Scott Dozier
Client Services - Settlements
Enron Net Works LLC
office: 713.345.7213
fax: 713.646.8420
email: scott.dozier@enron.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 01/30/2001 10:36 AM
---------------------------

mindi wright <mindi.l.wright-1@ou.edu> on 01/30/2001 08:50:18 AM
To: Sally.Beck@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: Dinner Invitation

Ms. Beck,
    I'm sorry I have not responded, but I have been out of town.  I am have
been unable to
open the invitation, however I will be attending.
Thank you,
Mindi Wright

Sally.Beck@enron.com wrote:

> (See attached file: OU Invitation.pps)
>
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                         Name: OU Invitation.pps
>    OU Invitation.pps    Type: Microsoft PowerPoint Show
(application/vnd.ms-powerpoint)
>                     Encoding: base64


Louise, I can take care of this.  Once in a while, I need to get my hands
dirty.  Mark


Thanks.

Vince

Stinson Gibner
04/16/2001 04:47 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: recommendation of an outstanding Baylor MBA student for summer
internship

I have talked twice to Althea.  Once last week and once after your email this
morning.  She has told me both times that she would arrange with Shirley to
put Rusty on your schedule and on mine.

--Stinson

Vince J Kaminski
04/16/2001 04:19 PM
To: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: recommendation of an outstanding Baylor MBA student for summer
internship

Stinson,

A reminder.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/16/2001
04:19 PM ---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski
03/31/2001 10:17 AM
To: Jim Garven <James_Garven@baylor.edu> @ ENRON
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson
Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: recommendation of an outstanding Baylor MBA student for summer
internship

Jim,

I shall contact Althea and make sure Rusty meets with the Research Group
members.

Vince

Jim Garven <James_Garven@baylor.edu> on 03/28/2001 01:01:42 PM
To: Stinson_Gibner@enron.com
cc: vince_j_kaminski@enron.com
Subject: recommendation of an outstanding Baylor MBA student for summer
internship

Dear Stinson,

I would like to call your attention to Rusty Parks, who is an MBA student
here and has been serving as my research assistant since last fall.? Rusty is
a very outstanding individual with a very impressive work ethic and interest
in topics such as financial engineering and technology, particularly as these
issues pertain to the energy industry.?? In fact, you met Rusty during your
recent visit to Baylor (specifically, last month over dinner at the Gamma
Iota Sigma chartering  ceremony).

I happen to know that Rusty is already scheduled to visit Enron for an
interview for a summer internship on April 19.? He has been invited by Althea
Gordon.? If there is any possibility that you could meet with him during his
visit, I am sure that he would be most grateful.?  Rusty is one of the very
best research assistants I have ever had, and I am sure that Enron would
benefit from having him aboard during the coming summer.

Sincerely,

Jim Garven

P.S.: Please find Rusty's resume attached to this email.

_________________________________________
James R. Garven, Ph.D.
Professor of Finance & Insurance
Department of Finance, Insurance and Real Estate
Hankamer School of Business
HSB 336
Baylor University
Box 98004
Waco, TX? 76798

Voice: (254) 710-6207
Fax: (603) 994-6680

E-mail: James_Garven@baylor.edu
Home Page: http://garven.baylor.edu
Vita: http://garven.baylor.edu/dossier.html
Research Paper Archive: http://garven.baylor.edu/research.html
_________________________________________
 - Rusty Parks Resume.doc


It should be under Diaz, Ann, if she got an invite.  Surely she got invited.


Hi Barry,
I'm just following up on the status of the DWR GISB.  Any word for me?  Call
if you have any questions.
Thank You,
Brenda Buxa
Interstate Gas Services
925-243-0350


Here is an older project mode we used.  Please do not show this to anyone.
You can pull out some of the Caledonia information from this model.  Let me
know if you have any questions.
Ben


FYI...

Here are the confirmations regarding what type of DASR the Joint UDC
Proposal addresses from each of the three UDCs.

PG&E
Rebecca:

In response to your questions regarding our latest Joint Proposal, here is
my answer to your specific questions below:

a) The DASR Cut-off etc mentioned in your recent filing indeed refers to
Connect DASRs only
As the primary purpose of the implementation of the suspension of DA is to
identify accounts that are eligible to go DA, the "DASR Cut-off" reference
is for CONNECT DASRs only.

b) All other DASRs, such as Disconnect and Updates, will continue to be
accepted regardless of any implementation of a Cut-off or not.
Disconnect and Update DASRs will continue to be accepted for existing
accounts and new accounts to be switched as proposed in our filing.

Thanks,
Calvin Yee
PG&E

SDG&E:
a) The DASR Cut-off etc mentioned in your recent filing indeed refers to
Connect DASRs only,

This is correct, the joint proposal refers to new connects

b) All other DASRs, such as Disconnect and Updates, will continue to be
accepted regardless of any implementation of a Cut-off or not.

Updates DASRs and terminations DASRs will continue to be accepted.

Lora Clay
Strategic Lead - ESP Relations
e-mail:  lclay@sdge.com

SCE:
I have seen the responses to Rebecca's questions from SDG&E (Lora Clay's
comments are included in the e-mail below) and PG&E (by separate e-mail to
Rebecca from Calvin Yee, not included here).  SCE would agree that the
Joint UDC proposal regarding a DASR cut-off date pursuant to the joint UDC
filing on 11/16/01 refers to:

1)  "Connect" DASRs only, and that
2)   under such a DASR cut-off, SCE would continue to accept "disconnect"
and "update" DASRs (for changes to billing and/or metering options) for
existing Direct Access customers (note: this is consistent with SCE's
previous communications regarding the subject of DASR cut-off date)

Jack Horne
Jack.Horne@sce.com

I have all three e-mails & will forward them to Dan today.

Rebecca

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Dan Douglass [SMTP:douglass@earthlink.net]
> Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 12:00 AM
> To:	ARM; Jeff Dasovich
> Subject:	Draft AReM Filing - Comments Needed
>
> Attached for your review and comment is a redlined third draft of our
> comments due Wednesday on the UDCs' Joint Proposal re DA suspension
> implementation.  My thanks to Rebecca Schlanert and Jeff Dasovich for
> their comments.  Jeff's suggestions re Option 3 are included at the end of
> the draft.  The essential change from what the UDCs proposed is that the
> CPA verifications would go directly to the Commission rather than to the
> UDCs.  I thought up a few reasons in support of this approach, but would
> appreciate more suggestions and comments.
>
> Since this is due Wed., comments received by close of business tomorrow
> will get put into a proposed final draft to be circulated Wed. morning.
> Thanks!
>
> Dan
>
> Law Offices of Daniel W. Douglass
> 5959 Topanga Canyon Blvd.  Suite 244
> Woodland Hills, CA 91367
> Tel:   (818) 596-2201
> Fax:  (818) 346-6502
> douglass@energyattorney.com <mailto:douglass@energyattorney.com> << File:
> 11-28-01 ARM Comments - Draft 3_.doc >>


What the hell are you talking about?

-----Original Message-----
From: Tlbrassard@aol.com [mailto:Tlbrassard@aol.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 10:41 AM
To: KHolst@enron.com
Subject: ???

What would you think about me pulling a Darin and keeping my options open?  Pretty shitty?


Hunter,
Just wanted to know who else you would want invited to the Cubs/Astros game in Chicago on May 17th.  I am sending out the invitations tomorrow.

Thanks,
Lynn


---------------------- Forwarded by John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron on 06/06/2000
07:14 AM ---------------------------

Charlene Jackson
06/05/2000 08:24 PM
To: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Celeste Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shelly
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Associate & Analyst Placement

John,

Following are the placements that are confirmed.  Those on your list that are
not confirmed were placed previously in other units.  It is my understanding
that these individuals will see other areas for their development, i.e.
origination, structuring and/or transactions.  If you have any questions
please feel free to call x39523.

Gas

Associates
Dustin Collins
Vikas Dwivedi
Li Sun

Analysts
Nate Blackburn
Sachin Gandhi
Miguel Nasser

Power

Associates
Doug Seaworth
Eduardo Gil
Pearce Hammond
David Maskel
Michael Kelly

Analysts
Possey Martinez
Gary Justice


FYI.  Please call me if you would like any additional information.  Thanks.
 -----Original Message-----
From:  Katwala, Sandeep
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 12:53 AM
To: Brownfeld, Gail; cwalker@linklaters.com; kelly.quinn@linklaters.com
Subject: Developments

Thought you ought to be aware of the following.

1. Maharashtra Pollution Control Board
DPC received a letter from MPCB asking it to cease generation until a Consent
to Operate is obtained. Kraske and his team are dealing with this. We have
heard that MPCB is likely to make a further visit to the site today to "dig
up the drains" and clearly the water pollution issue could arise as part f
that visit. The visit is rumoured and may not be fact as yet. Suhas has asked
Atul R to start working on a petition re the ceasing of generation issue. My
read of this is that the original approval given by MPCB clearly contemplates
that DPC is allowed to generate electricity while it is testing without a
Consent to Operate; it can do so under its Consent to Establish which was
given prior to financial close. MPCB disagreed at the time of the testing of
Phase I but seemed to have conceded the point eventually and DPC did test
before obtaining the Consent to Operate. This time DPC wrote to MPCB and told
them that it was going to test. MPCB wrote back and said that it should not
do so until a Consent to Operate had been obtained. DPC seems to have ignored
that instruction from MPCB and proceeded to test and export power to MSEB.
MPCB then visited the site and discovered that testing was going on and that
evening sent a letter to DPC asking it to stop generating. DPC may have to
file a writ petition on the generation issue - a meeting has been requested
with MPCB but has been declined.
On the rumoured site visit it seems that MPCB will turn up in force and no
doubt will find a number of things however minor.
My instinct is that this will end up in litigation in some form or other but
that it is going ot get very nasty. The Chief Minister is reported to have
gone on the offensive as far as the pollution issues are concerned.

2. Nagpur Petition
You will have read in the clippings that a GC Singh has filed a public
interest petition in the Nagpur High Court. I am trying to get hold of the
petition. DPC was apparently not a corespondent but the Court seems to have
issued a notice to DPC (which has not been received by DPC as yet) requesting
it to show cause as to why the petition should not be admitted. Atul R has
said that there may be a possiblity of knocking this out of the Nagpur Court
on the basis that that Court does not have jurisdiction over a matter which
has at its root a project in the Ratnagiri district which district does not
fall within the list fo areas that can be covered by the Nagpur Court. Atul R
is confirming this with Atul S. The Court seems to have given a time limit of
6 weeks in which DPC is required to send in an affidavit although some
reports in the press say that (i) the petition has been admitted and (ii)
that there is a hearing in 7 days time. Atul R's sense is that the petition
has not been admitted and that we have a 6 week period. More will be revealed
when we get a copy of the petition which hopefully is today. Press reports
indicate that the petition alleges the usual bag of things.

3. Invoices
Can Chris/Kelly please let me know if they have copies of the January and
February invoices. On the declaration issue you ought to know that DPC has
agreed a deal with MSEB whereby DPC waives the requirement of MSEB to
dispatch a minimum of 180MW and instead DPC will supply Block B testing power
instead of Block A power. Testing power is, under the PPA, to be paid for by
way of a Commissioning Fee (basically fuel costs) which is payable once the
Block has entered into ECS. The deal (recorded in letter agreements) is that
in return for MSEB taking the testing power and not beong obliged to take the
minimum of 180MW it will pay the Commissioning Fee monthly instead of at the
end of the testing period. [I think that this has a negative impact on the
MPCB generation issue as DPC is receiving income from the sale of power
(albeit small) before it has a Consent to Operate - but I am not aware of the
full facts and this may be wrong]

Sandeep


Hi,

	My name is Iris Mack.  Currently I work on Enron's Power Options Trading desk.

	I am primarily responsible for building our business in long-term, derivatives structures/trades on multiple commodities and financials.  For example, we are exploring potential structures and trades which involve power, gas, crude oil, weather derivatives, metals, etc.  Some of the building blocks for these multi-commodity derivatives products may be found in the attached document.

 	We are looking to build this business via utilizing as many of Enron's internal resources as possible.  Hence, it would be most helpful to meet with the relevant individuals in Gas Trading who would be interested in the development of multi-commodity derivatives trades/structures which may used to develop customized risk management tools for our clients.

	Thank you in advance for your assistance.

Kind regards,
Iris Mack, MBA/PhD
Enron Power Options Trading Desk


Start Date: 12/12/01; HourAhead hour: 12;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001121212.txt


Sara Kube
1309 Spruce Street 2C
Philadelphia, PA 19107
numbhand@yahoo.com

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Sara Kube


[IMAGE]   If the above links do not work or appear, simply copy this URL and paste it into your browser's address field:  http://web1.customoffers.com/click.asp?lnk=2638&email=PMIMS@ENRON.COM    Your privacy is extremely important to us. You requested to receive this mailing, by registering at  CustomOffers.com or by subscribing through one of our marketing partners. As a leader in permission-based email marketing, we are committed to delivering a highly rewarding experience, with offers that include bargains, entertainment, and  money-making ideas. However, if you wish to unsubscribe, click here  or link to http://web1.customoffers.com/unsubscribe.asp?emid=1493&email=PMIMS@ENRON.COM Third-party offers contained in this email are the sole responsibility of the offer originator.  [IMAGE]


I'm with you.  I told my wife I thought it would be a 3 touchdown game, but a
49 point margin is unacceptable.  I was at the game and it was as if the
Texas coaches got a bunch of guys from the frat houses this week and put
together a game plan on Saturday morning before kickoff.  They were out of
position, slow, unmotivated, and flat out not prepared to play.  I like Brown
and actually think he is a good fit, but at some point you actually have to
coach.  I lay this all at his feet.  Obviously the coordinators bear some
major responsibility as well.  I really don't know what to expect for the
remainder of the season.  They obviously are not as bad as they showed on
Saturday.  But the fact remains that they are capable of playing that poorly
on any Saturday, and I really did not think that with this defense they could
be humiliated.  I was very wrong.  Something has to change.  The fact is they
are 3-5 in the last 8 games.  And were favored in all but one.  Lack of
talent is no longer an excuse.  I think the entire remainder of the season
hinges on this Saturday.  If they play as poorly as they have all season
(they have beaten 3 terrible teams, and lost to a bad one) against Colorado,
they will lose and I could see them finishing at 6-5 and even 5-6 not out of
the question.  For this reason, I think that this could be the biggest game
of Brown's tenure at UT.  What do you think?


rhino here, sorry you lost your voice!  Just goes to show that sometimes
prayers are answered.  Just kidding!  We missed you at gas fair.  It just
wasn't the same without  you.  When are you comming back?  Oh damm, I've got
to go to a meeting.  I'll write later.  Rhino, out.


Join Bill Donovan on eSpeak at ethink.enron.com, Tuesday, June 6 at 10 a.m.
Houston time.  Bill, vice president of Enron Property Services Operations,
will conduct an "open mike" session on the new Enron building in Houston.

Are you at a remote location or can't make the event? Go into eSpeak now and
pre-submit your question(s) for Bill to answer during the scheduled event.
We want to answer everyone's questions, but due to the high volume of
questions we anticipate on this session, it would be helpful if you can keep
your questions short and simple.  This will increase the opportunity for your
question to be answered.

eThink: Invest Your Mind


Not everything in the data request responses was confidential--some of it is
public by nature.  For example, we were asked for material from the Form 10Q
which is filed with the SEC and is a public document.  It is my recollection
that the data regarding turbine configuration and the noise footprint, for
example, were not treated confidentiality.

The things that were submitted under seal primarily dealt with cost
information;  I do recall that we submitted the portions of the turbine
contract documents under seal.  As a practical matter, the Public Staff is
the only entity which has requested the information, and will not
disseminate it, particularly over our objections.  A problem would only
arise if the same discovery was sought by another party, which is unlikely
at this point, and which could be objected to.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 12:27 PM
To: Duncan, Allyson
Subject: RE: CPCN public information

One more thing.  Did someone send you copies of equipment contracts?  Those
have confidentiality provisions which need to be considered.  Therefore,
please advise what you received from Enron in that regard.

I was under the impression that most of what we were submitting we were
submitting as confidential information, specifically including the
responses to the Public Staff's data requests.  I don't recall the
specifics at this point.

Thanks again,

Kay

"Duncan, Allyson" <aduncan@kilstock.com> on 09/19/2000 11:07:28 AM

To:   "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:  RE: CPCN public information

The Application itself is public.  The testimony is public.  Without going
back through the material we have supplied (which I would be happy to do,
if
you like), the primary material that was confidential was the cost data and
supporting work papers.  Also, the engineering plan we filed recently in
response to a data request was confidential.

Let me know if you would like me to walk back through it more specifically.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 12:03 PM
To: aduncan@kilstock.com
Subject: CPCN public information

Hi Allyson,

Someone was asking which of the information we have filed is public
information.  Is the petition itself public?  What else would be public?

I know this is a variation to the "what is confidential" question. Once
again, your assistance is appreciated.

Kay


Christi and Diane:

I will also be out on vacation on Thursday and Friday, but I will be back
next week.  My secretary will know how to reach me and I will be checking
voice mail.

Jeff

	Christi L Nicolay
	12/13/2000 09:34 AM

		 To: Diane H Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject:

Diane and Jeff -- I am going to be on vacation, so please coordinate the
volumes, and California percentages with Sarah Novosel  202-466-9160.  Thanks.

Diane H Cook
12/12/2000 03:10 PM
To: Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: final again

I promise this is the final file:


Group,

Our discussion forum notes as a group are significantly improved in the past
3 weeks in many areas.  I believe communication in the group at shift changes
is improving and is quite good in general.  However, there is always room for
more improvement.  Specifically, other traders in the group and on the floor
would benefit from more detailed information regarding outages.  Please try
to include the reason for a plant derate as well as the ETR when a unit is
lost.  I would also highly recommend notifying the cash desk in the region
affected by the outage, either by email or verbally.  An important outage was
recently missed by both the real-time group and another cash desk on the
floor.  Real-time had ready access to the information concerning the outage
but did not pass that information on to others in the group at the shift
change or others on the floor.  In this case, such poor communication simply
made us look foolish.  We work hard for (and justly deserve) the solid
reputation we have on the floor.  Let's make sure we do the little things to
maintain it.

Again, keep up the good work.
Bill


Lunch with Joe Hartsoe at 12:00

Return to Houston on 5:20 flight.


fyi - Jade Eaton is one of Lara's contacts at DOJ
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 03/02/2001 01:12 PM -----

	Lara Leibman@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
	02/28/2001 03:23 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Re: HPL Closing

Steve,

Thanks for forwarding.  Actually, Brian sent it to me on Monday, and I
followed up with Ann and Barbara.  I have not spoken with Brian yet because I
am waiting for a green/red light from Barbara as far as Jade Eaton is
concerned.  Barbara and I spoke at length yesterday and she is concerned
about the counterparty's reaction to a meeting with DOJ (even an informal
one).  She plans to get back to me though with regard to whether they want me
to get involved at this stage.  I spoke to Rick as well so he is up-to-date
with the current status.

I'll let you know if anything further develops.  Thanks again.

Lara

	Steven J Kean@ENRON
	02/28/01 02:13 PM

		 To: Lara Leibman/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: HPL Closing

----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 02/28/2001 02:12 PM -----

	Brian Redmond@ECT
	02/26/2001 02:57 PM

		 To: John J Lavorato/Enron@EnronXGate, Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, David W
Delainey/HOU/EES@EES, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Oxley/Enron@EnronXGate, Wes
Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim DeSpain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph
Deffner/Enron@EnronXGate, Anne C Koehler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barbara N
Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Coffey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ann Ballard/enron@enronxgate, Jim
Schwieger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas A Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe Allen/NA/Enron@Enron, Tommy
Yanowski/Enron@EnronXGate, Philippe A Bibi/Enron@EnronXGate, Patrick
Wade/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/Enron@EnronXGate, Fran L
Mayes/Enron@EnronXGate, Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carolyn
Gilley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert L Hall/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Ranabir
Dutt/Enron@EnronXGate, Tom Shelton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve HPL
Schneider/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth W Kaase/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: HPL Closing

Please find the attached status update for the HPL transaction.  If you have
any questions please contact me.

Thanks,
Brian


Start Date: 12/24/01; HourAhead hour: 19;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001122419.txt