Bill, I have just returned from almost two weeks in London and seen your message.  Thank you for the feedback and for everything that you and your firm have done for us. I believe our respective organizations make a great team!  Please give my and Carrin's best to your wife:  we have many fond memories of our time with the two of you and your other guests at the GRAMMY Awards.  Also, I mentioned to Jonathon Sumption, Q.C. that we had the honor of being represented by you; he is another of your fans.  All the best.  Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"A William Urquhart" <awu@quinnemanuel.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22A+20William+20Urquhart+22+20+3Cawu+40quinnemanuel+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, March 15, 2001 1:06 PM
To:	Derrick Jr., James
Cc:	msmith1@enron.com; Sanders, Richard; Williams, Robert C.; Vsharp@enron.com
Subject:	Teamwork

Hi Jim--

The last month or so have been so hectic I have barely had time to breath.  We have gone from fire to fire.  Over the last 24 hours (since we submitted our last hurry up brief) I have been reflecting on the experience.  To say it has been positive is an understatement.

Under ordinary circumstances working under such continual pressure--with so much $ on the line--would have been stressful.  However, when you work with Enron the opposite is true.  There is such a sense of esprit d' corp that permeates your organization.  It makes difficult things easy and the impossible, just another day in the office.

There are no egos to trip over at Enron.  When there is a problem to solve, it is everyone's problem.  People are not afraid of asking questions.  They keep questioning until they understand.  Nobody minds repeating themselves.  They are incredibly patient with outside lawyers--spending hours and hours bringing us up to speed.  As you well know, yours is not a simple business.  It is so refreshing.

There are so many benefits to this team approach.

1.  You get things right the first time.  As you know, in any litigation is critical that the court view your side as the teller of truth.  Because you get things right the first time,  the company is not exposed to being discredited when the other side responds.

2.  I would bet that Enron's outside legal bills are half what they would be otherwise.  With most companies the outside (and inside) lawyers get a minimum of support from the business people.  The business people view business as business and lawsuits as an annoyance.  (I should say that I could never understand that given the direct  Perhaps it is the trader mentality at the company.  Perhaps it is an unwavering focus on the bottom line.  Perhaps it is just that everyone feels they are a part of a team and they realize that by working together the team can achieve things that no one person can do working alone.  Whatever the reason, the outside lawyer's job is made so much easier.  That results in much, much lower legal bills.

3. You increase your chances of winning.  The brainstorming is so valuable.

4. The outside lawyers, like me, feel they are part of the team.  Outside lawyers do not feel as if they are on trial.  They can ask the dumb questions.  I know that all of us here are looking forward to the next opportunity to work with the Enron team.

5.  Human nature being what it is--I think that when there are choices to be made as to whose work goes on the top of the pile--the Enron assignment goes to the top more often than not.

You have built a great legal team.  All of your legal staff should be proud of what they have built.

Thanks for letting us come along for the ride.

Regards,

Bill

A. William Urquhart
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges LLP
865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor
Los Angeles, CA  90017
Tel:  (213) 624-7707
Fax:  (213) 624-0643
E-Mail:  awu@quinnemanuel.com
Web:  http://www.quinnemanuel.com


jeff:
checking to see if you're still on for dinner.   wine room at aldo's at 7:00.
drinks at your place before?

john


You are welcome.  What a neat idea - electronic thank you cards.

-----Original Message-----
From: Apple iCards [mailto:erb@mac.com]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 2:51 PM
To: Corman, Shelley
Subject: Stacy Erb has sent you an Apple iCard

This iCard has been sent to you from Stacy Erb


Zhiyong,

I hope you will feel better soon.

Vince

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Wei, Zhiyong" <Zhiyong.Wei@ENRON.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Wei+2C+20Zhiyong+22+20+3CZhiyong+2EWei+40ENRON+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Friday, August 24, 2001 1:07 PM
To:	Vince.Kaminski@enron.com
Subject:	Thanks

Vince,

Thank you very much for the lovely flowers. I am enjoying them every
moment.

Zhiyong


-----Original Message-----
From: Toysrus.com@toysrus.com [mailto:Toysrus.com@toysrus.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 3:22 AM
To: tgeacco@enron.com
Subject: Free Shipping & $1,300 in Savings

HUGE HOLIDAY SAVINGS

Dear Toysrus.com Valued Customer,

Happy Holidays!

Celebrate with Toysrus.com's best values of the year and get this year's hot toys before they sell out.

For a limited time, come to Toysrus.com and take advantage of special Toys "R" Us Big Toy Book offers?

-       FREE SHIPPING!
-       Over $1,300 worth of exciting savings
-       FREE 2 ft tall plush Mickey or Minnie character - a $29.99 value - with any $100 purchase, while supplies last!

Just visit www.toysrus.com today and get all these great deals ...and more!

Plus, enjoy the web's best toy shopping experience and selection - from Learning & Discovery toys to Hot character toys including Harry Potter? and Monsters Inc., all the traditional favorites like Barbie
, LeapFrog
 and Milton Bradley? games and those hard to find video games.

We sincerely appreciate the opportunity to serve you and wish you and your family a safe and happy holiday season.

The Toysrus.com Family

We hope you enjoyed receiving this message. However, if you'd rather not receive future
e-mails of this sort from Amazon.com/Toysrus.com, please use the link below or click the Your Account button in the top right corner of any page. Under the Your Account Settings heading, click the "Update your communication preferences" link.

http://www.amazon.com/your-account


John:

The reason for the large Vega numbers on the TopPage report, while there were
no corresponding changes in the Volatility curves, is due to the change in
the mid. price for the current day versus the prior day. The corresponding
volatility skews that are added to the vols. for the 2 days is causing the
large vega numbers.

For example, for deal number QV5087.2 (exp. date 01-Jan-2002):

  Current Day  Prior Day
Mid. Price 5.885   5.772
Strike Price 3.5   3.5
Mid - Strike 2.385   2.272
Vol.  0.555   0.555
Vol. Skew 0.03816   0.03635
Actual Vol. 0.59316   0.59135

Option value for prior day using current day's vol. =  7,616,935
Option value for prior day using prior day's vol.     =  7,547,238
Vega                =  69,697

Thank you,
Jeremy
x3-0573


Steve:  here is the first set of comments from one of our lawyers.  If you
would like me to bring him to the Hill to discuss any of the items or arrange
a phone call, just let me know.  In the meantime, I will continue to gather
more comments and gather them together in one document with suggested
specific edits.  However, given your short turn around, I thought it helpful
to forward what I received ASAP.
---------------------- Forwarded by Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron on 04/27/2000
06:14 PM ---------------------------

"Wenner, Adam" <awenner@velaw.com> on 04/27/2000 06:01:53 PM
To: "'Sandherr, Cynthia'" <csandhe@enron.com>, "'Navin, Allison'"
<anavin@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: gramm-schumer bill.DOC

 <<gramm-schumer bill.DOC>> Please see my comments re the Gramm-Schumer
Bill.

 - gramm-schumer bill.DOC


Stacey

Have you been able to find anything out about what happened with these
deals?  I would like to have this fixed by quarter end.

Please let me know where we stand.

Thanks
Tracy


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 03/05/2001
07:10 AM ---------------------------

liane_kucher@mcgraw-hill.com on 02/28/2001 02:14:43 PM
To: Anne.Bike@enron.com
cc: Phillip.K.Allen@enron.com
Subject: Re: Enron's March Basdeload Fixed price physical deals as of 2/27
/01 Attachment is free from viruses. Scan Mail

Sorry, the deadline will have passed. Only Enron's deals through yesterday
will
be included in our survey.

Anne.Bike@enron.com on 02/28/2001 04:57:52 PM

To:   Liane Kucher/Wash/Magnews@Magnews
cc:
Subject:  Re: Enron's March Basdeload Fixed price physical deals as of 2/27
/01
      Attachment is free from viruses. Scan Mail

We will send it out this evening after we Calc our books.  Probably around
7:00 pm

Anne

liane_kucher@mcgraw-hill.com on 02/28/2001 01:43:44 PM

To:   Anne.Bike@enron.com
cc:

Subject:  Re: Enron's March Basdeload Fixed price physical deals as of 2/27
      /01 Attachment is free from viruses. Scan Mail

Anne,
Are you planning to send today's bidweek deals soon? I just need to know
whether
to transfer everything to the data base.
Thanks,
Liane Kucher
202-383-2147


Stinson,

No problem.

Vince

Stinson Gibner
07/12/2000 11:26 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Giuseppe cell phone

Vince,

Can I loan to Giuseppe my cell phone for the summer?

Stinson

---------------------- Forwarded by Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT on 07/12/2000
11:25 AM ---------------------------
From: Samer Takriti@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS on 06/28/2000 10:49 AM
To: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Bandwidth Trading Feature Set

I will be on the call. I may disconnect around 4:00 to attend the traders'
daily meeting.
A couple of issues:
1. Would it be possible to get Gappy a cell phone for the summer? He does not
have a phone at home. I think the reason for avoiding installing a phone in
his apartment is the increasing cost of his Houston stay.
2. It is getting noisier here. Gappy and I are wandering if we could get
office space downstairs (that we share). We will maintain presence on 44, but
we will be able to discuss when needed.
-Samer


Joe, I am probably really missing something on this, but I can't determine
when the big OECD Forum is.

Rosie

Joe Hillings
02/08/2000 03:27 AM
To: Kenneth Lay/Corp/Enron@Enron, Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: RE: Energy Service Coalition (ESC) Information

---------------------- Forwarded by Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron on 02/08/2000
03:33 AM ---------------------------

WORTH <WORTH@biac.org> on 02/08/2000 03:46:35 AM
To: "'Joe_Hillings@enron.com'" <Joe_Hillings@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: Energy Service Coalition (ESC) Information

The OECD people are quite excited about the prospect of Ken Lay speaking at
their big Forum. Would his calandar permit it? Doug

> ----------
> De :  Joe_Hillings@enron.com[SMTP:Joe_Hillings@enron.com]
> Date?: jeudi 27 janvier 2000 11:30
> A : WORTH
> Objet : RE: Energy Service Coalition (ESC) Information
>
>
> Doug: Many thanks. I'll see you next Thursday. Can you send your address?
> Regards. Joe
>
>
>
>
> WORTH <WORTH@biac.org> on 01/27/2000 04:19:45 AM
>
> To:   Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON
> cc:
>
> Subject:  RE: Energy Service Coalition (ESC) Information
>
>
>
> I look forward to seeing you on the 3rd of Feb. at 11AM. Warm regards.
> Doug
>
> > ----------
> > De :    Joe_Hillings@enron.com[SMTP:Joe_Hillings@enron.com]
> > Date?:  vendredi 7 janvier 2000 17:51
> > A :     Worth@biac.org
> > Objet : Energy Service Coalition (ESC) Information
> >
> > <<Fichier?: pic11799.pcx>><<Fichier?: FINAL FINAL ONE
> > PAGER.doc>><<Fichier?: Handout.doc>><<Fichier?: Talking Points.doc>>
> > Doug: Thank you for speaking with Chris Long and I this morning. Your
> > suggestions were excellent and much appreciated. I did speak with
> > Jacqueline Grapin at the European Institute here and she was grateful
> for
> > your suggestion that she speak with Mr. Bertrand Colomb, CEP of LeFarge
> > Cement who also chairs the European side of the TransAtlatic Business
> > Council (TABD). She said that he owns a farm in Northern Virginia and is
> > here now but thinks that he is returning to Paris this weekend but could
> > be
> > available to meet in Paris in the next few weeks.  She also has good
> > contacts with EDF and GDF and concurs that they are inseperable from the
> > GOF but she will test the waters and advise.
> >
> > I have not had a chance to call Frank Farfone at DOW. Thanks for the
> > information that Frank is chairing the Trade Committee of the BIAC and
> has
> > a meeting early in February. Frank is a friend and has been supportive
> of
> > our efforts to gain market access for energy services. I will call him
> > later today or Monday to see if we might participate in his meeting or
> get
> > him to make a pitch.
> >
> > Your question about having Ken Lay meet with some key members of the
> BIAC
> > in Paris to have a dialogue with them on his work in changing the
> business
> > model to meet the real world of business that you would personally
> > organize
> > will be passed along to him. I think Ken would not only be terriffic but
> > would enjoy the exchange.
> >
> > Doug, you may be interested to know that we have retained Hills and
> > Company
> > to be our trade counsel and that Carla and Bob Fisher are spending time
> > getting us prepared for the WTO negotiation to promote energy services.
> I
> > am very pleased with the selection and the work they are doing for us.
> >
> > We miss you in the Washington community where for years you were so
> > instrumental in promoting the trade agenda both as head of the IBM
> office
> > and as chair of the US Council for International Business Trade
> Committee.
> > However, as Secretary General of the BIAC at the OECD I already see your
> > fine and experienced hand promoting the competition agenda. Sam
> Palmisano
> > spoke to the Enron Management Meeting in November which was first rate.
> I
> > followed up with the IBM Washington office to ask if they would join the
> > Energy Services Coalition but so far they haven't. They just don't
> > function
> > the way they used to.
> >
> > Doug, thanks again for your advice and encouragement.
> >
> > Regards and best wishes.
> >
> > Joe
> > ---------------------- Forwarded by Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron on
> 01/07/2000
> > 10:38 AM ---------------------------
> >
> >
> >  (Embedded
> >  image moved
> >  to file:      From:  Chris Long
> >  pic11799.pcx) 01/07/2000 10:33 AM
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > To:   worth@biac.org
> > cc:   Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lora Sullivan/Corp/Enron@ENRON
> >
> > Subject:  Energy Service Coalition (ESC) Information
> >
> > Doug -
> >
> > I was on the phone with Joe today while you discussed the ESC strategy
> in
> > France.  Attached you will find some basic information on what we are
> > trying to accomplish.  I will be more than happy to forward more
> > comprehensive information.  Included in this correspondence are two
> > summary
> > documents and a list of the coalition membership.  We look forward to
> > getting your thoughts.
> >
> > Thanks - Chris Long
> >                   (202) 466-9158
> >
> >
> >
> > (See attached file: FINAL FINAL ONE PAGER.doc)
> >
> > (See attached file: Handout.doc)
> >
> > (See attached file: Talking Points.doc)
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Mail Delivery Subsystem <Mailer-Daemon@postmaster.enron.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, October 09, 2001 3:15 PM
To:	Carson, Mike
Subject:	Returned mail: see transcript for details

>From one jail to another most likely!  the Astros just got their sphincters
riped off!!!!  Go Sox!

When are you coming to H-Town to have a cocktail??

MC

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "Britt, Michael J" <Michael.Britt@Constellaion.Com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Tuesday, October 09, 2001 2:41 PM
   To:     'mcarson2@enron.com'
   Subject:  Yo

   Hey:

   What's you're Q4/Q5 associated-Craig, Co. off peak spread offer.  Just
   kidding.  I see you're branching out of entergy jail.  Giddy up.  Hope
   all
   is well.

   mjb

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Please find attached the following article:
'Bloomberg makes gas broking debut' - Energy Argus Daily: European Natural Gas

Kind Regards,
Kuldeep Chana


Market Participants:

	The revised ISO Issues Committee proposal is available for your
review via the following link:
http://www2.caiso.com/clientserv/stakeholders/

	I request that you return your comments to me by COB on Wednesday,
July 11 via email bwoertz@caiso.com <mailto:bwoertz@caiso.com>

	Thank You,

	Byron B. Woertz, Jr.

	Director, Client Relations

	(916) 608-7066

	(800) 481-7037 - Pager


Please review and comment on attached sample run.


---------------------- Forwarded by Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT on 09/26/2000
12:14 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Jean Mrha @ ENRON                           09/26/2000 09:35 AM

To: Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: for Hunter

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Jean Mrha/NA/Enron on 09/26/2000 09:26 AM
---------------------------

"Oatsboy@BuffNet.net" <oatsboy on 09/26/2000 09:54:15 AM
Please respond to oatsboy@buffnet.net
To: Jean <Jean.Mrha@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: for Hunter

Jean,

Tell Hunter that I turned on the heat yesterday, September 25.

Love , Dad


Trena, attached please find a brief memorandum on the referenced subject.  As
we discussed, this memo outlines the issues in very general terms.  Some of
the legal concepts touched upon -- e.g., the exact nature of the fiduciary
relationship between a licensed broker and its customers -- are rather
complex, and would bear out very involved legal research and analysis in a
more detailed memorandum.

Mark Taylor has advised me that the legal department's approval of the
purchase of any exchange membership (clearing or non-clearing)  will require
the personal approval of Mark Haedicke, the chief legal officer of Enron
Wholesale Services.

As always, please feel free to call me with any comments or questions.
Thanks -- Bob

Robert E. Bruce
Senior Counsel
Enron North America Corp.
T (713) 345-7780
F (713) 646-3393
robert.bruce@enron.com


I've made a stab at revising Lee's letter.


Office of the Chairman - Enron Net Works LLC

From: Office of the Chairman - Enron Net Works LLC@ENRON on 11/07/2000 05:51
PM
Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: ENW-Employees_Houston
cc:
Subject: ENW Holiday Party Invitation

Here it is!  Your Enron Net Works Holiday Party Invitation.  Please click on
the attached link to launch.

http://207.21.193.94/Extravaganza.html


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

June 1, 2001 5:00pm through June 4, 2001 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------

ECS to ECN Network Interconnection, June 9th 2001

This is a notification that the Enron Corp. I/T Networks team will be
connecting the new building network infrastructure located in Enron Center
South (ECS) to the existing Enron Center North (ECN) backbone network.  While
this activity is not expected to produce a disruption to network services,
this notice is designed to alert the organization to our activities.  No
network hardware or systems are anticipated to be shutdown.  The actual
physical interconnection of the networks will be performed in the EB 34th
floor Data Center.

Interconnection activities are scheduled to occur the evening of June 9th
2001 starting from 7:00 p.m.(CT) and completing around 11:00 p.m. (CT).
Application testing activities will begin at 11:00 p.m. (CT) once all network
testing has completed.

If you have any further questions, please contact Pete Castrejana at
713-410-0642 for more information.

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.

ENRON CENTER SOUTH DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:  SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET:     SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

MESSAGING:      SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

Impact:  Exchange
Time:  Fri 6/1/2001 at  7:00:00 PM thru Fri 6/1/2001 at  7:30:00 PM
Outage:  Initiate Failover of Nahou-msmbx01v to unlock backup api
Disruption:
Environments Impacted:  Users on with mailboxes on nahou-msmx01v
Purpose: Ensure backups run successfully
Backout: N/A
Contact(s):  Scott Albright  713-345-9381

Impact:  CORP
Time:  Sat 6/2/2001 at  10:00:00 PM thru Sat 6/2/2001 at  10:15:00 PM
Outage:  Exchange server message change
Disruption:  Intermittent Disruption of Service
Environments Impacted:  Corp Exchange users on nahou-msmbx05v
Purpose: To enable the new mailbox over the limit message
Backout:
Contact(s):  Tim Hudson  713-853-9289

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS: No Scheduled Outages.

SITARA:  No Scheduled Outages.

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY: No Scheduled Outages

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:  No Scheduled Outages.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
        FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center

Specific Help:
Information Risk Management   (713) 853-5536
SAP/ISC
        (713) 345-4727
Unify On-Call      (713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call     (713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS   (713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP    (713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR      (713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support      (713) 327-3893  [Pager]
EES Help Desk     (713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797
TDS -Trader Decision Support On-Call                    (713) 327-6032 [Pager]


Dan, thanks for your help on this. I've forwarded the latest to John Ulrich
for signature.  In case I forget, please remind me to send you a certified
copy of the resolution.  I know it's been signed by all, including the
mayor.  The PG&E bankruptcy has taken up a lot of my attention, and I may
not remember to ensure that staff gets a copy to send with the executed
contract.  Grant Kolling.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com [mailto:Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2001 10:56 AM
To: Kolling, Grant; Kim.Ward@enron.com
Subject: RE: Enfolio Master Firm Purchase/Sale Agreement

(See attached file: 2001-002ctr.doc)

Grant,
     One last change,  Kim Ward agreed to reduce the penalty provisions in
3.2 and 3.4 from $0.15 to $0.015.  The rest of the contract was unchanged.
As stated in previous email, please forward two signed originals to me for
Enron's further handling.


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 05/01/2001 02:14 PM ---------------------------

Outlook Migration Team@ENRON
04/27/2001 01:00 PM
To:	Allison Horton/NA/Enron@ENRON, Amir Baig/NA/Enron@ENRON, Brandon Bangerter/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian Ellis/Corp/Enron@Enron, Charles Philpott/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Chris P Wood/NA/Enron@Enron, Chris Tull/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dave June/NA/Enron@ENRON, Donald Sutton/NA/Enron@Enron, Felicia Buenrostro/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Johnna Morrison/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe Dorn/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathryn Schultea/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Leon McDowell/NA/Enron@ENRON, Leticia Barrios/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Milton Brown/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Raj Perubhatla/Corp/Enron@Enron, Shekar Komatireddy/NA/Enron@Enron, Andrea Yowman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Angie O'Brian/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bonne Castellano/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gwynn Gorsuch/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jo Ann Matson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, LaQuitta Washington/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rick Johnson/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sandra Lighthill/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Valeria A Hope/HOU/ECT@ECT, Charlotte Brown/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ronald Fain/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gary Fitch/HR/Corp/Enron@Enron, Anna Harris/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Keith Jones/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kristi Monson/NA/Enron@Enron, Bobbie McNiel/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John Stabler/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Michelle Prince/NA/Enron@Enron, James Gramke/NA/Enron@ENRON, Blair Hicks/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jennifer Johnson/Contractor/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Jim Little/Enron@EnronXGate, Dale Lukert/NA/Enron@ENRON, Donald Martin/NA/Enron@ENRON, Andrew Mattei/NA/Enron@ENRON, Darvin Mitchell/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mark Oldham/NA/Enron@ENRON, Wesley Pearson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Ramon Pizarro/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Natalie Rau/NA/Enron@ENRON, William Redick/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mark A Richardson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Joseph Schnieders/NA/Enron@ENRON, Gary Simmons/NA/Enron@Enron, Delaney Trimble/NA/Enron@ENRON, David Upton/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mike Boegler/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lyndel Click/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gabriel Franco/NA/Enron@Enron, Randy Gross/HR/Corp/Enron@Enron, Arthur Johnson/HR/Corp/Enron@Enron, Danny Jones/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John Ogden/Houston/Eott@Eott, Edgar Ponce/NA/Enron@Enron, Tracy Pursifull/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lance Stanley/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Frank Ermis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jane M Tholt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jay Reitmeyer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Keith Holst/HOU/ECT@ect, Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Monique Sanchez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tori Kuykendall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda H Fletcher/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeanne Wukasch/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Theresa Franklin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Potter/NA/Enron@Enron, Natalie Baker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Suzanne Calcagno/NA/Enron@Enron, Alvin Thompson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Cynthia Franklin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jesse Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joan Collins/HOU/EES@EES, Joe A Casas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelly Loocke/ENRON@enronXgate, Lia Halstead/NA/Enron@ENRON, Meredith Homco/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Loving/NA/Enron@ENRON, Shanna Boudreaux/ENRON@enronXgate, Steve Gillespie/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tamara Carter/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tracy Wood/NA/Enron@ENRON, Gabriel Fuzat/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Jack Netek/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Lam Nguyen/NA/Enron@Enron, Camille Gerard/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Craig Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jessica Hangach/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA, Kathy Gagel/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA, Lisa Goulart/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA, Ruth Balladares/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA, Sid Strutt/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA
cc:
Subject:	2- SURVEY/INFORMATION EMAIL

Current Notes User:

To ensure that you experience a successful migration from Notes to Outlook, it is necessary to gather individual user information prior to your date of migration.  Please take a few minutes to completely fill out the following survey.  When you finish, simply click on the 'Reply' button then hit 'Send'  Your survey will automatically be sent to the Outlook 2000 Migration Mailbox.

Thank you.

Outlook 2000 Migration Team

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Full Name:

Login ID:

Extension:

Office Location:

What type of computer do you have?  (Desktop,  Laptop,  Both)

Do you have a PDA?  If yes, what type do you have:   (None, IPAQ, Palm Pilot, Jornada)

Do you have permission to access anyone's Email/Calendar?
    If yes, who?

Does anyone have permission to access your Email/Calendar?
    If yes, who?

Are you responsible for updating anyone else's address book?
    If yes, who?

Is anyone else responsible for updating your address book?
    If yes, who?

Do you have access to a shared calendar?
    If yes, which shared calendar?

Do you have any Distribution Groups that Messaging maintains for you (for mass mailings)?
    If yes, please list here:

Please list all Notes databases applications that you currently use:

In our efforts to plan the exact date/time of your migration, we also will need to know:

What are your normal work hours?  From:      To:

Will you be out of the office in the near future for vacation, leave, etc?
       If so, when?        From (MM/DD/YY):      To (MM/DD/YY):


"If everybody is thinking alike, then somebody isn,t thinking.8  - George S.
Patton, Jr.

Keeping with our Mind,s Eye Madness week, be sure to check out the Enron Mind,
s Eye Motorcade
on Friday, April 27th from 11:30am to 1:00pm at the Big E Cafe.  This art car
convoy will spend the day visiting
Enron-designated stops in the community to promote innovation and
creativity.  Mirroring Enron,s innovation,
these artists think about the way things could be and are not limited by the
way things are.

Featuring:
Lunch by Escalantes Mexican Grille - choice of beef, chicken or veggie
fajitas with trimmings, dessert and a drink for $5.
Live salsa music will be provided by Tropicrew, featuring Enron,s own Ms.
Alex Villarreal as the lead singer.
Non-profit organizations represented will include the March of Dimes, SEARCH
and the Lupus Foundation of America.
Get lunch free if you're dressed "freaky"!

Word of the Day
Zeitgeist \TSYT-guyst; ZYT-guyst\, noun:  The spirit of the time; the general
intellectual & moral state or temper characteristic of any period of time.


October 16, 2001

Mr. Michael Taylor, Greetings from eSource:

Pursuant to your request for a Sample D&B MDD Report-Trininty Consultants, please see the results of our research.  Should you have any further questions, or additional tasking, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Thank you for using eSource <http://esource.enron.com/>.  We look forward to assisting you in the future.

Regards,
Stephanie W. Jett
eSource Researcher
(713) 345-7056


Mark can you confirm the status of Singapore for the EnronOnline Games
participation.

Cheers

Victor


Jim:

At Mark Haedicke's request I am forwarding you this note.

Regards,

Jeff


Karen,

Fred Mitro forwarded an email you sent him concerning a legal question.
Please be advised that Enron policy requires that all outside legal advice be
coordinated through an inhouse lawyer, and certainly any legal advice given
to Enron employees must be given to Enron counsel as well.  This requires
some discipline on the part of our outside counsel, but we find it works in
everyone's best interest.

Thank you for your attention to this very important policy.

Kay


This file uses the expected wellhead netback price to calculated payables.

Ty


Per,

Today, I submitted a brief summary of each groups 2001 goals.  I wasn't able
to talk to you before putting these out but they were fine for step one.
Please review  and make any changes you wish to them.  I also need you to add
as many specifics as possible.  For example number of transactions, $
amounts, etc.  Please read and make the changes on this email and return to
me asap.  Keep your goals to no more than 5.

Global Risk Markets
? Create $38 million in gross margin and $26 million in EBIT
? Complete and market and execute transactions in three primary
technologies:  double trigger, upstream term-working interest and power price
risk

Thanks,
mike


----- Forwarded by Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT on 12/11/2000 04:11 PM -----

	Leslie Hansen
	12/04/2000 12:31 PM

		 To: Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: JMansfield@anpower.com, Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: ANP Marketing Company

Please open ANP Marketing Company up to trade US power pursuant to the
on-line GTCs, pending credit approval.  As we discussed, if credit has not
yet approved this counterparty for on-line trading, please let Jeff Mansfield
of ANP know and give him a credit contact.

Thanks so much,

Leslie


Prudential.  Carol Coates???  He said he was working in a 3 person office for a woman,

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Schlueter, Mark
Sent:	Wednesday, October 31, 2001 7:28 AM
To:	Weldon, V. Charles
Subject:

Where did Vikas go to work again?


The CPUC still plans to vote on suspending DA on Thursday but a few new twists:

The State Treasurer announced last week that the State has no cash flow crisis and has adequate cash reserves and short-term borrowing capacity to last until the end of the fascal year in 2002 (we think July ends the fiscal year)
President of Senate says at press conference on Monday that he intends to ask CPUC to study how to provide DA while still protecting small customers (letter not yet written)
Enron's coalitions, AReM and WPTF, filed a motion at the CPUC today saying:

	-- do not suspend DA -- no longer an emergency
	-- begin immediate hearings to establish financial structure for continuing DA

Coalition of water agencies files independently today saying -- do not suspend, no longer an emergency

Stay tuned


we will talk ,call you later

-----Original Message-----
From: JMINNIECE@sbcglobal.net [mailto:JMINNIECE@sbcglobal.net]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 5:19 PM
To: Parks, Joe
Subject: RE: Fishing

Got your number in the cell. here's my number 415-385-
0510, it's my cell. I get in at 2:30 on Thursday, want
to meet Maco and me out Thursday night for a beer?
--- Original Message ---
From: "Parks, Joe" <Joe.Parks@bridgeline.net>
To: "Joe Minniece" <jminniece@sbcglobal.net>
Subject: RE: Fishing

>hey dumby, call me when you get to town friday night.
also i am having some=
> people over sunday, if you want to come over.
>=20
>joe
>713-408-7962(cell)
>713-993-7171(home)
>832-851-2821(work)
>
>-----Original Me[Parks, Joe] hey, ssage-----
>From: Joe Minniece [mailto:jminniece@sbcglobal.net]
>Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 3:50 PM
>To: Parks, Joe
>Subject: Re: Fishing
>
>
>oh well, i'll see you next week. Joe
>
>----- Original Message -----=20
>From: Parks, Joe <mailto:Joe.Parks@bridgeline.net> =20
>To: Joe  <mailto:jminniece@sbcglobal.net> Minniece=20
>Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 1:24 PM
>Subject: Fishing
>
>Bad news. I am not going to be able to take off work
that day to go fishing=
>. But will be arround for the weekend.
>
>=20
>
>
>
>******************************************************
******************
>This e-mail is the property of Bridgeline Holdings,
L.P. and/or its relevan=
>t affiliate(s) and may contain confidential and
privileged material for the=
> sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review,
use, distribution or di=
>sclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are
not the intended reci=
>pient (or authorized to receive for the recipient),
please contact the send=
>er and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail
(and any attachments h=
>ereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an
acceptance) and do not create=
> or evidence a binding and enforceable contract
between Bridgeline Holdings=
>, L.P. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended
recipient or any other p=
>arty, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis
of a contract by esto=
>ppel or otherwise. Thank you.
>******************************************************
******************
>
>
>
>
>******************************************************
******************
>This e-mail is the property of Bridgeline Holdings,
L.P. and/or its relevan=
>t affiliate(s) and may contain confidential and
privileged material for the=
> sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review,
use, distribution or di=
>sclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are
not the intended reci=
>pient (or authorized to receive for the recipient),
please contact the send=
>er and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail
(and any attachments h=
>ereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an
acceptance) and do not create=
> or evidence a binding and enforceable contract
between Bridgeline Holdings=
>, L.P. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended
recipient or any other p=
>arty, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis
of a contract by esto=
>ppel or otherwise. Thank you.
>******************************************************
******************
>


PRESENTATIONS THAT WORK
   August 29 & 30 in EB560

     Does your job include preparing and delivering presentations? . . . . .
. .  Then this course is for you!

This course focuses on instruction and practice in organization, delivery
skills, design tips and use of visuals effectively (powerpoint and overhead),
and question-and-answer models.  Participants will receive personalized,
confidential feedback from the instructor and will develop a self-improvement
action plan.  Customized exercises give participants first-hand experience in
one-on-one, small groups, impromptu, and sit-down settings.

For registration, please click here () to go directly into the Development
Center "Ernie", or call 3-0357.


Louise,

In the event that some of the people who are being offered positions in UBS do not take them, but instead resign, and we therefore keep someone in UBS who otherwise would have gone to the estate, I thought we should agree potential bonuses.

To be clear: these bonuses would be paid ONLY if the individual wound up going to UBS instead of the Estate as currently planned.

If you agree, please let me know and forward to Amy Fitzpatrick. This should allow us to respond quickly as events develop.

Name			 Estate Contingent Bonus
BOUDREAU, KARA L	 10,000
DELUCA, BRYAN A	 -
DUNCAN, ERICA B	 12,000
GUILLORY, MICHAEL C	 2,500
HOANG, CHARLIE V	 4,000
O'DAY, KAREN 	 2,500
Zeman, Angie	 	12,000

Dave


This deal was not transported on contract 1856, the 15,000 was sold to El Paso Merchant directly at that point.  It was 15,000 a day for the 30th and 31st.

Let me know if you need anything further.

Mike

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Beale, Antoinette
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 12:48 PM
To:	Olsen, Michael
Cc:	Parker, Megan; Farmer, Daren J.
Subject:	TXU May 01

Mike,

I have the following outstanding issue with TXU:

May 01- Contract 1856

A path is needed on Delivery 17054701 for 19087mmbtus with the Receipt point 175054701.

Thanks!


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/06/2000 05:31
PM ---------------------------

"Thompson, Peter J." <peterthompson@akllp.com> on 12/06/2000 05:30:01 PM
To: "Kay Mann (E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Pipitone, Paul" <paulpipitone@akllp.com>, "Cobb, Chris"
<chriscobb@akllp.com>

Subject: Exhibits to the CA Energy Development Agreements

  Attached please find clean and blackline versions of the exhibits to
the CA Energy Development Agreements.

To complete the exhibits, we need to include the following:

1. Exhibits B-1, H-2 and R need to be added.

2. Do we need to add language to section B of Exhibit A-1 because
these are dual fuel turbines?

3. Should the scope be changed in Exhibit B because these are dual
fuel turbines?

4. In Section 3.1 of Exhibit K, the terms "Specific Date" and
"Recovery Schedule" are not defined.

5. For Exhibit T, please confirm that Enron has received all of the
documents that it should have received by now.

6.  If required, we need to have a Seller Parent Guaranty for
Exhibit C-1.
 <<Exhibits to CA Development Turbine Agreement.DOC>>  <<Exhibits to CA
Energy Break-Out Agreements.DOC>>
 - Exhibits to CA Development Turbine Agreement.DOC
 - Exhibits to CA Energy Break-Out Agreements.DOC


Unplanned Losses - ($1942.41)
Static Sch Fees - $374.00

Total - ($1568.41)

ERCOT Sch Fees - $418.00


RTO Week

 <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />

Day 4 - October 18, 2001

Afternoon Session

Standardizing Markets, Business, and Other Practices

Panelists for this discussion were:  Sarah Barpoulis, PG&E National Energy Group; William P. Boswell, GISB; Bill Burkes (substituting for David J. Christiano), City Utilities of Springfield, Missouri; David N. Cook, NERC General Counsel; Michael Kormos PJM Interconnection; LeRoy Koppendrayer, Minnesota Public Utilities Commission; and Marty Mennes, Florida Power & Light Company.

General Observations

The Commissioners were all present the majority of the time (Massey left late in the  afternoon).  FERC Staff was active in the discussion; however, the commissioners were very active as well, asking perhaps as much as 70% of all questions.  There was a general consensus that standards were needed; much discussion focused simply on how much and by who. The Commission seemed very interested in leaning what they needed to do to move the industry forward and how far they needed to go.  Panelists urged the need to mover forward as quickly as possible, but both they and FERC seemed to recognize that some of the issues regarding standardized market design and such needed to be addressed before RTOs could really begin to move forward.  There was discussion on identifying which industry group (NERC or GISB) would take the reins in the future.  On an interesting tangential note, there was noticeable conflict between NERC and GISB, with veiled insults between the two organizations somewhat common during the discussions.

FERC Deliverables

A great deal of the discussions focused on identifying what the industry needed from the Commission.  Staffers probed all panelists to find what they felt was critical.

The first major topic was "How many RTOs?  What is their scope?"  All panelists seemed to agree that this question needed to be answered immediately by FERC, in strong definitive language.  N o one offered any specific language, but seemed to be urging FERC to issue a formal statement.

The next topic was, "What will be standard market design?"  Panelists varied on this, but most felt strong guidance from FERC is urgent.  Some urged for one mandatory design for North America, one supported a set of rigid standard designs, one supported a single design with requests for exceptions (followed by an in-depth review process), and one seemed to prefer the current situation.

The commission in general seemed to be very interested in understanding what the industry needed to move forward.  They continually visited this topic throughout their discussions, asking questions like, "Do we need to issue a Mega-Order that addresses all these issues?" and, "How much detail do you need us to provide?"   General feel from the panelsists seemed to be they wanted strong leadership in this areas.  Kormos and Burkes went so far as to say FERC should "Mandate as much as they felt comfortable - and then go a little further."  Others seemed to be a little worried about this idea, but in general did not oppose the concept, citing only general warnings and the need for cautious investigation.

One item of interest: Wood referred to the filing made by the Electronic Scheduling Collaborative and specifically asked if the items identified in the "RTO Design and RTO Implementation" section would address many of the questions and uncertainty facing the industry with regard to RTO design.  Kormos indicated that clear and specific answers to these questions specifying a course of action would go a long way toward guiding the industry.  The section to which Wood referred was one that I wrote, and asked the following questions:

?         Congestion Management - When Operational Security Violations occur, how is the system to be stabilized in a fair and equitable manner that is nonetheless efficient?  Will LMP based systems be standard, or will there be others that must be accommodated?

?         Transmission Service  - Are transmission services required to schedule ("covered" schedules only), or are they risk management tools protecting from congestion charges (both "covered" and "uncovered" schedules are allowed)?

?         Loop Flows  - Are contract-path based or flow-based transmission services appropriate?  If contract-path based, how are parallel path issues to be addressed?

?         Grandfathered Transmission Service - Should contracts existing prior to RTO development be transferred, or is there an equitable way to retire those contracts?  Are there other solutions?

?         Energy Imbalance Markets - How are imbalance markets to function? Will they serve as real-time energy markets (support unbalanced schedules), be limited to supplying needs of imbalance service (require balanced schedules), or will they be required at all?

?         Ancillary Services - Will ancillary service markets be developed in standard ways?  Will entities be required to actually schedule ancillary services (required to schedule), or will they be treated primarily as financial instruments (protecting against real-time POLR charges)?

?         Losses - Can we utilize the imbalance markets to support losses?  Can we create specific loss standards that facilitate the scheduling process, or must we support methods that are currently in tariffs, but technically unwieldy?

?         Non-Jurisdictionals - How are non-jurisdictionals to be integrated into the new world?  Should systems be designed with the assumption that non-jurisdictional will be part of an RTO?  Or should they be designed to treat each NJE as a separate entity?

Hopefully, FERC will use this section as a template to answer these critical questions in an assertive manner, and give some solid direction in which to move. Kormos emphasized the need for concrete answers to these questions, pointing out that vague answers (i.e., "do congestion management") will take a year or two to resolve, but specific answers (i.e., "LMP with financial hedging instruments") will take only months.  The Commission asked Mike about moving forward, and he told them that effectively, it was impossible to move forward with implementation without getting these issues addressed.

Now for a  funny point - One of the commissioners (I think Breathitt) referred to some concerns expressed in the Northwest that their high concentration of hydro power makes LMP inefficient for the Northwest.  Kormos flat out said, "My profession is understanding how power systems work, and I don't believe that that statement is true."  He then backpedaled a bit and said that it would need more study, but he stood by his statement that the assertion by the Northwest interests was false.

NERC and GISB

A great deal of discussion focused around the need for a single standard-setting organization.  Massey went so far as to ask, "Are we looking at a beauty contest between NERC and GISB?"  Cook and Boswell then went into several short polite jabs at each other's organizations.  Other participants continually reiterated the need for ONE, INDEPENDENT organization.  Interestingly, Boswell was very emphatic about the established trust and respect in GISB, while Cook preferred to only talk about the "new" structure of NERC and did not focus on its history.

Brownell offered some not-too-subtle passive support of GISB by pointedly asking both Cook and Boswell if they lobbied political positions (i.e., were they not only an organization but also a stakeholder?).  GISB was easily able to say they were not, but NERC of course had to admit to their romancing of Congress and the Bush administration for reliability legislation. Point, Brownell.

Mennes acted as somewhat of a supporter for NERC, playing Dave Cook's yes-man.  He probably did them a little bit of harm by pointing to NERC's supposed "successes," such as TLR and E-Tag.  If staffers have tenure, they will likely remember that these "successes" have not been so successful, resulting in several filings and interventions.  We may also wish to file comments in specific objection to these claims, to refresh their memory and to show the pretty picture Marty painted was in fact a fiction.

There was a little discussion about splitting reliability and market issues, but general consensus was that I could not be done.  There was also some talk of folding NERC under GISB/EISB.

The arguments began winding down after a some time, and Boswell strongly urged the Commission to speak to industry executives and advocacy group leadership to see whether NERC or GISB should lead the industry forward.  NERC somewhat less enthusiastically supported this position.  In general, I would say it was a close fight but GISB came out more on top.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Andy Rodriquez
Regulatory Affairs - Enron Corp.
andy.rodriquez@enron.com
713-345-3771


Following our discussion this morning we discussed and agreed in principle, the following changes to the "standard" contract form with UBS:

1 - Involuntary Termination
Change for all contract to 90 days. Wording 99% agreed.

2 - UBS "free" option beyond March 15
Change to March 22 and make mutual. Wording 95% agreed.

3 - Non-compete to exclude Enron retrospective reference
Re-wording of this clause to focus on NETCo and ENA rather than Enron. Wording 50% agreed.

4 - Miscellaneous clause
Change to clause that says ee reps they know of no claims, grievances, to be changed to "against individual". 100% agreed.

5 - Recognition of prior Enron service wording
Added to contracts. Wording lifted from offer letter. 100% agreed.

While we have agreed to above, please bear in mind:

- Contracts will now be delayed until wording is finally signed off by lawyers (eta 3 hours)
- We have to draw the line on further changes en mass now or we won't get anything done.
- We have not "agreed" salary and promotions completely. UBS are concerned about percentages of a few. I think we will have resolution this evening.
- I am not expecting new docs until late this evening.

David


Please click on the link below for the invitation to the museum.

http://207.21.193.94/starwars/


Hi Louise-
Thought this might be helpful in your review of Canada's cap charge. I've left a new plan for Canada, Upstream (Jean moved her cap charge from Upstream Executive to Offshore), and Restructuring (we adjusted their margin target to ($20.7M) -they've called themselves Merchant Asset Mgmt on the plan presentation- would you like for me to make the name change on our management summary?) Additionally, I've left the February 2001 Team Income Statement booklet for your review as well. These items are in Tammie's chair. Please let me know if you have any questions- x30352. Thanks!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	East, Laynie
Sent:	Wednesday, March 28, 2001 5:47 PM
To:	Killen, Faith
Cc:	Vargas, Hope
Subject:	Canada Capital Charge - 2001 Plan

Faith,

Per Hope's voicemail, here is the support for the $3.6MM Capital Charge for Canada's plan.  I've also included a reconciliation between Delainey's number and Canada's number.  Please let me know if you would like to discuss further.

Thanks,
Laynie
x3-3131


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/07/2000
02:08 PM ---------------------------

"Julie Haviland" <julie.haviland@PaineWebber.COM> on 02/07/2000 11:33:00 AM
To: "'vkamins@enron.com'" <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:

The muni bond that we bought today is the following:

Grant Co. Washington
Coupon 5.875%
Due 01/01/31
Callable: 01/01/06 at 102.00
YTM: 6.25%

I have already put a copy of your grant summary in the mail.

If you have any questions, please call me at (713) 654-0324.

Thanks, Julie


Tanya,

Can you coordinate, in my absence, the lunch with IT
and credit.

We need the body count and reservation at the restaurant for the 14th.

Vince


Dan,  Attached is a clean and redlined version of my changes.  As we
discussed, the letter is now non-binding.


My 1984 format is a bit out-of-date.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kroll, Heather
Sent:	Thursday, November 29, 2001 1:55 PM
To:	Mann, Kay
Subject:	RE: format

Certainly!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mann, Kay
Sent:	Thursday, November 29, 2001 1:35 PM
To:	Kroll, Heather
Subject:	format

Could you send me the format you are using for your resume?

Kay


What were the individual participation rates by entity?

	Shirley Jo Wilson

	12/12/2000

To: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Cooper Alliance Pre-buy program

Before I answer this email, thought I would confirm with you how we intend
collecting and distributing the $180K  rebate for the pre-buy program.  The
methanol plant contributed $300K toward the $1.500K goal.

Thanks,

Shirley Jo Dickens-Wilson
Director - Process and Operating Equipment
Global Strategic Sourcing
713-646-7545
shirley.jo.wilson@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Shirley Jo Wilson/NA/Enron on 12/12/2000 02:52 PM -----

	Kerry Roper
	12/12/2000 08:29 AM

		 To: Shirley Jo Wilson/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Cooper Alliance Pre-buy program

How will we recieve this rebate on our books.  Will it be credited to the
same place the charge hits?
---------------------- Forwarded by Kerry Roper/GPGFIN/Enron on 12/12/2000
08:12 AM ---------------------------

Stephen Busick
12/11/2000 02:18 PM
To: Kerry Roper/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Cooper Alliance Pre-buy program

---------------------- Forwarded by Stephen Busick/ECF/Enron on 12/11/2000
02:14 PM ---------------------------

Stephen Busick
08/09/2000 03:16 PM
To: Shirley Jo Wilson/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: David Bush/ECF/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Cooper Alliance Pre-buy program

Shirley,

Now that we have discussed it, I understand sufficiently to be confident that
it's good all around for us to participate.  It will alter our procurement
timing a little if we do delay our overhauls to next year (we would be buying
the long lead, high dollar stuff this quarter even if we do delay), but it
seems clear that it is in Enron's best interest to make those slight changes.

I will let our controller and Finance Manager know what's up just to keep
them informed.  They may be helpful to us in figuring out how to get the
rebate to come into GPG through Enron Methanol Company or Enron Clean Fuels.
I will admit to very limited knowlege of how those transactions take place.

I will also let Debbie Hinkle (our buyer, 281/882-4232) know to expect your
call about prices we have been receiving from Cooper.

Thanks again,

Steve

	Shirley Jo Wilson
	08/09/2000 09:28 AM

To: Stephen Busick/ECF/Enron@ENRON
cc: Lisa Honey/NA/Enron@ENRON, Rositza Smilenova/NA/Enron@ENRON, Rick
Craig/OTS/Enron@Enron

Subject: Cooper Alliance Pre-buy program

Steve,

Per my voice mail today.

We would like to offer your operation the opportunity to receive 12% rebate
on parts purchased from Cooper.  We have prepaid $1.5MM for parts and will
receive a 12% rebate.

Other parts of GPG have used about $600K of the pre-buy and we would like to
role your shutdown requirements into the program.

Please call me as soon as possible and I will answer any questions you have.

Look forward to talking to you.
Regards,
Shirley Jo Dickens-Wilson
713-646-7545


Jeff and Alicia:
Do we need to discuss these issues?  If so, I'm available this mornoing
before 10:45 and after 12:15.
carol
Carol
---------------------- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 04/28/2000
08:48 AM ---------------------------

AMcmahon@milbank.com on 04/27/2000 06:08:09 PM
To: sdwyer@enron.com, mabboudy@enron.com, aedgley@enron.com,
mevans@enron.com, plord@enron.com, baiken@enron.com, bglisan@enron.com,
MJakubik@enron.com, jbadillo@enron.com, jginty@enron.com,
donette.dewar@enron.com, acamarero@enron.com, sschard@enron.com,
dscott@dlj.com, rcabes@dlj.com, scott.sefton@enron.com,
carol.st.clair@enron.com, dhemsey@dlj.com, jball@dlj.com, pwoodbur@dlj.com,
rpiskadl@dlj.com, nora.dobin@enron.com, bherman@dlj.com,
melissa.p.allen@arthurandersen.com, cclementdavies@velaw.com,
jeldredge@velaw.com, smacgibbon@velaw.com, tchandler@velaw.com,
mschimberg@velaw.com, mkidwell@velaw.com, awright@velaw.com,
eosterberg@velaw.com, mrh@mm-brig.mottmac.com, jll@mm-brig.mottmac.com
cc: TSiebens@milbank.com, PFletcher@milbank.com, TDavis@milbank.com,
BKayle@milbank.com, LKeene@milbank.com, FKneip@milbank.com,
FPuleo@milbank.com, ERayner@milbank.com, MWilson2@milbank.com,
AWalker@milbank.com
Subject: Project Margaux - Swap Issues List

Sent for and on behalf of Tom Siebens

 <<Swap Issues List - April 26, 2000.doc>>

This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee
or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify
the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer.

 - Swap Issues List - April 26, 2000.doc


" i know i'm pretty but i ain't as pretty as a pair of titties" - the pimp in
true romance


PLEASE REMOVE ME FROM THIS DISTRIBUTION LIST AS THIS IS THE EIGHTH ONE I'VE
RECEIVED THIS MORNING.  THANK YOU.

	Yan Jin@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
	04/11/01 09:24 AM

		 To: Chad Landry/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON
		 cc: All Enron Employees United States@ENRON,
IMCEANOTES-iBuyit+40ENRON@ENRON.com@ECT@ENRON, Sheila A
Knudsen/ENRON@enronXgate
		 Subject: Re: Recall: Reply Requested: Do You Code Or Approve Invoices?


Hi Marchris,

I'm in ENA Legal, and I'm looking for the right person to discuss this with.
Christi Nicholay suggested I get you involved.  Please give me a call at 713
345 7566 to discuss.

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/06/2001 09:29
AM ---------------------------

Ben F Jacoby@ECT
03/05/2001 10:48 AM
Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Tripp Scott Proposed Terms of Engagement

OK. This guy's a lawyer by training, but we're hiring him as a lobbyist.
Roger was previously looking into this, and proposed our standard form
agreement. Steve and I were wondering if we could work off of Tripp Scott's
proposed form, considering that he will not be representing us as our counsel.

Please let me know.

Thanks,

Ben

Kay Mann@ENRON
03/04/2001 02:27 PM
To: Ben F Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Tripp Scott Proposed Terms of Engagement

Ben,

What are these folks supposed to do for Enron?  I had heard a rumor that we
were looking to hire someone to lobby for us on a success fee basis.  Is this
the same deal?  I know on the international side there were hoops to jump
through before such an engagement could be signed off on.  I'll have to check
to see what the drill is on this side of the street.

Kay

	From:  Ben F Jacoby @ ECT                           02/28/2001 12:18 PM

Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Kay Mann
cc:

Subject: Tripp Scott Proposed Terms of Engagement

Per my earlier e-mail, attached is Tripp Scott's form.
---------------------- Forwarded by Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT on 02/28/2001 12:17 PM
---------------------------

Steven Krimsky@ENRON
02/28/2001 09:11 AM
To: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Tripp Scott Proposed Terms of Engagement

As discussed, Roger has no problem engaging Tripp Scott.  He does want to use
Enron's standard 9 page engagement letter in lieu of the attached 2 pager
received from Tripp Scott.  Is this necessary - any thoughts?

Steve

---------------------- Forwarded by Steven Krimsky/Corp/Enron on 02/28/2001
09:08 AM ---------------------------

Steven Krimsky
02/16/2001 03:44 PM
To: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roger Balog@ECT, Marchris Robinson/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Tripp Scott Proposed Terms of Engagement

As discussed in Fort Pierce, Tripp Scott is that insurance policy I've been
looking for to help secure the commission vote in Pompano.  Tripp Scott will
also assist us in our door knock campaign in the County & Tallahassee.
Pozzuoli is a mover & shaker and is on a first name basis with Jeb Bush -  he
was the Chairman for the Bush/Cheny Broward County re-count.

Bill Keith & Debbie Orshefsky highly recommends the engagement.

Lets discuss Tuesday.

Steve
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven Krimsky/Corp/Enron on 02/16/2001
03:38 PM ---------------------------

"Edward J. Pozzuoli (Paulette R Segal)" <PRS@trippscott.usa.com> on
02/14/2001 01:56:42 PM
To: steven.krimsky@enron.com
cc: TSCS.TSCS-1.ejp@mail4.allegro.net

Subject: Proposed Terms of Engagement

It was a pleasure meeting with you and Debbie on Monday afternoon.  Per our
discussion, enclosed is Tripp Scott's proposed terms of engagement as well as
an abbreviated description of the firm and its key directors.

I look forward to speaking with you soon.

Ed
 - 239299.WPD
 - 239243.WPD


Kevin Montagne is running the "code" reports.  I should have them sometime Tuesday.

I spoke will Bill and let him know we would have the "code" tomorrow.

Kevin Montagne said his research indicates we do lock two records when there is an order.  I relayed that  info to Bill.


The following is our close schedule for this coming month.  Please keep in
mind the following key times...

Unify to Sitara bridge back 1:45p.m. Wednesday, May 31st (all errors must be
clear by this time)
Mass draft at 6p.m. Wednesday evening
Accrual process begins Thursday, June 1st at 6a.m.

If you have any changes to this timeline, please ensure that I am contacted
as soon as possible.

Thanks,
Mechelle
x37278


Start Date: 3/5/01; HourAhead hour: 18;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001030518.txt


Sara:

I have followed up with Brent and he is working on the Entergy-Koch amendment for CommodityLogic.  He cannot commit to a completion date at this time since he has some other priorities.  I've asked for Friday and he has indicated that may be aggressive.  The sales team is presenting Entergy-Koch the CommodityLogic legal agreements today (ESA, Password application, Subscription Agreement).  In light of this, can you provide a status of where the other 18 customer amendments are (excluding Sempra and Entergy-Koch) ?  The Sales process is moving along and we will need to have these amendments ready to present to the customer soon.  Could you go through the list and provide an estimate date of when a draft of the amendment would be available by client.  We need to provide a status to management on Monday 10/8.

Per our conversation today, if there is a way to focus on the creation of a template that addresses the confirmation exchange via electronic systems (e.g. ConfirmLogic) that can be shared earlier with the clients.  The additional language that is deemed necessary can be added to this form as needed per counterparty.  This will allow us to achieve getting something to the client so they can start the process from their side while we continue to shore up what language needs to be added.  We still need to be thinking of how to keep this process simple to allow quick turnaround yet satisfy the legal requirements for confirmations.  I ask that you and Leslie continue to help define a better process for us and I will continue to work with Kim and the sales team to implement this process.

Thanks for your help
Kathryn
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Theriot, Kim S.
Sent:	Tuesday, September 18, 2001 12:30 PM
To:	Shackleton, Sara
Cc:	Cordes, Kathryn; Taylor, Mark E (Legal); Greenberg, Mark; Hansen, Leslie
Subject:	ConfirmLogic Target Customer List-Legal Entity Name
Importance:	High

Sara,
See attached spreadsheet which shows the legal entity names by counterparty for each commodity.  Name differences between the commodities are highlighted in Blue.

Kim Theriot

 << File: Top20 Legal Entity Names.xls >>

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shackleton, Sara
Sent:	Monday, September 17, 2001 9:56 AM
To:	Theriot, Kim S.
Cc:	Greenberg, Mark; Cordes, Kathryn; Taylor, Mark E (Legal); Hansen, Leslie
Subject:	ConfirmLogic Target Customer List

Kim:

I am reviewing the list of 20 target customers dated 9/14/01 in an effort to set up a document drafting timetable.

For financial trading purposes, I need an accurate list of trading counterparties reflecting the complete name of each legal entity.  Also, if a company is split into more than one legal entity (such as power and gas) for financial trading purposes, I need the names of both entities.

Thanks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3801a
Houston, TX  77002
Ph:  (713) 853-5620
Fax: (713) 646-3490


Daren,

FYI.

Bob
---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT on 06/13/2000 04:32
PM ---------------------------

Suzanne_Saldivar@eogresources.com on 06/13/2000 10:47:00 AM
To: rcotten@enron.com
cc: charlotte_hawkins@enron.com, crodrig@enron.com
Subject: Volume Increase - HPL Meter 68-6296 (S.G. Marshall) and HPL Meter
98-6067 (Martinez, MB)

Production from the SG Marshall leases has increased due to workovers of
some of the wells.  Effective June 14, 2000, please increase the June 1
estimate from 2,300 mmbtu/d to 8,000 mmbtu/d @ HPL Meter 68-6296 delivery
to HPL Thompsonville (PG7E Meter 834134).

Production from the M. Martinez leases has increased due to a new well
behind meter 98-6067.  The estimates from this meter has increased from
4,600 mmbtu/d to 8,200 mmbtu/d.

Please call me at (713) 651-6858 with any questions.   Thanks!!!


The Commodity Fundamentals website is back in service.  Please use the link provided below to access the website:

http://fundamentals.netco.enron.com/main.asp

Thank you,

Amanda Rybarski
Gas Fundamentals
Office: (713) 853-4384
Fax: (713) 646-8453
Pager: (877) 482-0772
Cell: (713) 560-0934


Dear Haas Community,

Sunday, June 24th, 2001, between 8:00 AM and noon, several servers will
be shut down for maintenance, for upgrade of the server control switch, and
to relocate some servers in preparation for summer server upgrades.

The  email/web server, haas, will be shut down  and restarted, making email
service and the Haas main web site  unavailable for about an hour.   Also,
one of the servers required for web mail will be moved, taking the pilot
web mail service off-line for about an hour.  In addition, the old research
server, grady, and the new research file server, bear,  will be shutdown
and restarted  during the outage period.

During the outage email will be held for later delivery.  No email will be
lost.

As always,  should you experience any problems with computing services
following the maintenance, please contact the information desk in the
Computer Center, or helpdesk at http://helpdesk.haas.berkeley.edu, phone
510/642-0434.  Please note that Helpdesk is not manned on
weekends.  Requests for help logged during the weekend will be responded to
Monday morning.

Your patience is greatly appreciated.

Thank you.

-----------------------
Haas Computing Services


Exactly what I told Lorie (send her a gift certificate for a manicure and
pedicure), but she kind of balked.  I'm not sure of her taste.  It'll be
interesting to see what they send you.  Let me know.

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	06/07/2001 03:07 PM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Jacoby

Works for me.  We are leaving to check in to the hotel, then back.  I had to
cancel manicure/pedicure ( and charged for it)  A hint that a gift
certificate for same would work might be appropriate.

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 06/07/2001 02:56 PM
To: kay.mann@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Jacoby

Jacoby's assistant just called and wanted your home address.  Apparently Ben
is going to send you something or someone (manicurist/pedicurist) to your
home.  I told her you liked champagne too if he wanted to get you a beverage
and also that you would be leaving to go celebrate your daughter's birthday a
little later this afternoon.  I didn't want them sending out someone and you
not be there.  I can see you now with the phone in one hand and a manicurist
on the other or better yet, a glass of bubbly!


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Rodenburg, Eric [mailto:erodenbu@UtiliCorp.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, February 26, 2002 12:35 PM
To:	Schoolcraft, Darrell; Spraggins, Gary; Carr, James; Blair, Jean; Wilkens, Jerry; Clapper, Karen; Washington, Kathy; Callans, Nancy; Bryan, Randy; Walden, Shirley
Subject:	SUNFLOWER - NNG - HOURLY - 2002.xls


Counterparties who have agreed to our direct bill arrangement with El Paso - PNM, LADWP, TEP, AEP
Counterparties who have not yet decided - SRP
Counterparties who will not trade with us as El Paso - PAC

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Symes, Kate
Sent:	Thursday, November 29, 2001 2:05 PM
To:	DL-Portland Real Time Shift
Subject:	El Paso Status - PLEASE READ

FYI -

All trades done on behalf of El Paso will now be directly billed by El Paso. This means three things for us:

1. Format of the model stays the same.
2. Deals do not go into Enpower.
3. "Counterparty" in the model must show the billing counterparty only (to simplify Kathy's settlement process).

*Per El Paso, please try to market their power through SRP, PNM, PAC, and LADWP only.* These are the counterparties El Paso has contacted regarding our new arrangement.

Please let me know if you have questions.

Thanks,
Kate


Looks like our exposure is less than $25,000.  Please call me.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/05/2001 10:54
AM ---------------------------

"Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com> on 04/05/2001 10:50:49 AM
To: "C. Kay Mann (E-mail)" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: FW: Delta - HSR Issues

-----Original Message-----
From: Campbell, Carolyn
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 2:40 PM
To: 'kay.mann@enron.com'
Cc: Keffer, John
Subject: Delta - HSR Issues

Kay:

I just spoke with Bill Blumenthal (our HSR expert).  He and Paul Hastings'
HSR expert have traded voice mails exchanging information, but have not yet
spoken.  Bill says that Delta is apparently relying on the "ordinary course"
exemption, which may be fine if all the LLC wants to do is hold turbines for
re-sale.  If the LLC works on development of a power plant, the analysis
would be different.  In any event, Bill agrees that the only safe thing to
do is provide now for the possible requirement to file later.

Prior to speaking with Bill, I also spoke with Greg Lang.  He agrees that we
should provide now for the possible requirement to file later.  He again
asserted that since this is "Enron's structure," Enron should agree to bear
50% of any filing fee.

Steve Thome indicated earlier today that Enron may be willing to bear half
of the filing fee.  Under current regulations, the filing fee will be $45k
if, at the time the put/call is exercised, the assets have a fair market
value of $50-100 million, and the filing fee will be $125k if, at the time
the put/call is exercised, the assets of the LLC have a fair market value of
$100-500 million.

Please let me know whether to advise Greg that Enron will accept
responsibility for half the filing fee.  Thank you.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.


Congratulations on your promotion to Senior Director.  That makes all of the
life juggling seem a little more worthwhile, doesn't it?!


What planet did Gray Davis come from??  What's the perception of this guy in
California??  Hope all is well.

KR


We are parking 4,875 dth/day for the 27th-30th on CNG (deal 281565) and we
are taking out 478 dth/day for the month of June (deal 281565).  ENA is
paying CNG $.04 times the total volume parked.

Angie, these volumes may go up.  I think Tenn is still trying to balance the
weekend and they are a little long.  Clarissa will let you know.


TODAY: Telecom equipment companies, long given up for dead, are
enjoying a recommendation renaissance, and one formerly dead DSL
provider, Covad (COVD), is back with a vengeance. The question,
says frequent contributor Dave Sterman, is whether it can ever
turn a profit.

Our top 10 most recommended list has a couple of newcomers, and
Morgan Stanley discusses the key investment strengths and risks
of Motorola (MOT), in a report which you can get for free as a
Multex Investor member by registering for the firm's free
research trial. See details below.

======================== Sponsored by =========================

Buyback Guru Sells 4 Stocks, Locks in +46.8% in 3 Months!

David Fried knows a stock is undervalued when the company
buys back its shares. Thats how he locked in a whopping
+46.8% in three short months! "Buy these 6 tech buybacks
today," Fried says. Get them with a FREE 30-day trial:

http://www.investools.com/c/go/BACK/MTEX3A-backTY1
==============================================================

Below
---------

Investment ideas
Broker reports
Top 10
Free and sponsored reports

==============================================================

Investment ideas
-----------------------------------------

1. Upward revisions: Analysts see brighter earnings picture for three equipment companies
In an uncertain market, analysts seem sure about the earnings potential of these companies

by John Filar Atwood, equity research columnist

The reduction in capital spending by major carriers has weighed on
telecom equipment stock performance in recent months, and threatens
to do so throughout 2002. The consensus estimate now appears to be
a 26 percent drop in carrier capital expenditures in 2002 resulting
in a 23 percent decline in aggregate revenues for the equipment group.

Click here to read more.
http://www.thetelecommanalyst.com/article.asp?docid=6434&nd=0129

2. Horror story: Covad is back from the dead
The company's rebirth is miraculous. But there's a problem: No
one knows if it can still make money.

By Dave Sterman, equity research analyst

The demise of NorthPoint Communications, Rhythms NetConnections,
and Covad Communications (COVD) in 2001 seemed to spell the end
of the data local exchange carrier (DLEC) sector. Investors were
left to conclude that the DSL industry would now reside squarely
in the hands of the regional Bell operating companies (RBOCs),
such as Verizon (VZ), SBC (SBC), Qwest (Q), and BellSouth (BLS).

But to the surprise of many, one DLEC, Covad, has emerged from the
ashes to fight another day. At least one analyst thinks the company
is poised to get it right this time.

Click here to read more.
http://www.thetelecommanalyst.com/article.asp?docid=6320&nd=0129

3. Good values: A tale of two values
This pair of wireless infrastructure stocks offers long-term growth--
don't let the prices fool you

By Ben Mattlin, equity research columnist

Over the past two years, as the market's become more challenging,
investors are learning to be more selective than they used to be.
Rather than seizing momentum and growth, which worked well in the
'90s, successful investors are adopting a value orientation.

But which discounted stocks represent true value and which are
inexpensive simply because the company they symbolize is no good? In
telecom, where most stocks have gotten hammered, it can be especially
difficult to distinguish between duds bargains.

Click here to read more.
http://www.thetelecommanalyst.com/article.asp?docid=6198&nd=0129

4. Fishin' chips: Consolidation and content
Wireless semiconductor stocks wrestle for share of a shrinking market

By Dave Sterman, equity research columnist

As we saw in the IPO market in recent years, fast-growing
industries attracted a number of new players. But now that those
industries have matured, growth has slowed and many smaller players
are looking to merge in order to compete against the top tier
players. As we noted a few weeks ago, wireless service providers
in particular look set to engage in a merger orgy.

It now appears that the same could be said for the wireless
semiconductor industry. As growth in wireless handset sales has slowed,
chip vendors are also looking to march down the aisle. In mid-December,
Alpha Industries (AHAA) and Conexant (CNXT) announced plans to merge
their wireless chip divisions.

And more deals may emerge in the months to come. "We wouldn't be
surprised to see additional activity as companies work to reach
critical mass at a much higher level than in the past," says
CIBC's Dale Pfau. Many players added factory capacity just as
the industry slowed.

Click here to read more.
http://www.thetelecommanalyst.com/article.asp?docid=6239&nd=0129

======================== Sponsored by =========================

Scottrade rated #1 Brokerage by Kiplinger's Personal Finance. Visit
Scottrade.com NOW to learn more! With top-rated service through
146 offices and competitive pricing with $7 trades, choose Scottrade
as your broker! Scottrade offers 8200 Mutual Funds with NO
TRANSACTION FEES, no fee IRAS, no inactivity fees and $25,000,000
in account protection.

http://www.scottrade.com/index.asp?supbid=5454
==============================================================

Broker reports
-----------------------------------------

1. WHAT'S HOT?: Wireless profits

Alltel (AT) beat the firm's fourth quarter estimates of $0.74 by
a penny a share, thanks to a strong performance from the group's
wireless unit, which showed surprising strength in ARPU and margins.
(2-page report for purchase - $10)
Click here. http://www.thetelecommanalyst.com/download.asp?docid=26087201&nd=0129

2. SPECIAL REPORT: Cellular signals

Predicting "mixed results" in Q1 2002, CIBC explains when the
outlook should improve. Top picks are named in components,
infrastructure, and handset manufacturers. Discussion of handset
sales and subscriber trends. 24 exhibits.
(29-page report for purchase - $75)
Click here. http://www.thetelecommanalyst.com/download.asp?docid=25996183&nd=0129

======================== Sponsored by =========================

It's here! The Multex Investor Toolbar
Now you can get broker research, quotes,
charts and company information from
anywhere on the Web.

http://www.athoc.com/wis/activate/activate.asp?pid=10279&mktmsg=JA1
==============================================================

Free and sponsored reports
-----------------------------------------

1. FREE RESEARCH REPORT:
Qualcomm (QCOM) is a CDMA pure play

The firm explains why QCOM is its preferred investment vehicle
for playing code division multiple access (CDMA) technology, which
is the core technology for 3G wireless networks--which wireless
carriers plan on deploying over the course of the next several
years. This five page report, which usually sells for $10, is free
to Multex Investor users for the next 72 hours.
Click here. http://www.thetelecommanalyst.com/download.asp?docid=26080760&nd=0129

2. FREE SPONSOR REPORT:
Morgan Stanley explains its "neutral-volatile" rating on Motorola (MOT).

The firm says MOT "has the ability to become the "Intel" of telecom
equipment," and lists key investment strengths and risks. Multex
Investor members can register for the firm's free-research
trial to access research on this and other stocks.
Click here. http://www.thetelecommanalyst.com/download.asp?docid=4345572&sid=8&nd=0129

Top 10
-----------------------------------------

Top 10: Most recommended telecommunications stocks
This week's selection includes newcomers to the list ViaSat (VSAT)
and CTC Communications (CPTL)

Using NetScreen Pro, the professional version of Multex Investor's
Net Screen, we sorted for the most recommended telecom stocks with
significant analyst coverage (at least 5 in the current quarter),
and sorted the result for you according to the highest average
recommendation and by valuation.
Click here. http://www.thetelecommanalyst.com/article.asp?docid=1502&nd=0129

================================================================

Click here to register at Multex Investor:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/registration/regWrapA1Basic.asp

Click here for The Telecomm Analyst homepage:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/Analysts/HomeTTA.asp

If you'd like to learn more about Multex Investor, please visit:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/welcome.asp

If you can't remember your password and/or your user name, click here:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/lostinfo.asp

If you want to update your email address, please click on the url below:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/edituinfo.asp

================================================================
To remove yourself from this mailing list, please REPLY to THIS
email message with the word UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line. To
remove yourself from ALL Multex Investor mailings, including the
Daily Update and The Telecomm Analyst, please respond with the
words NO EMAIL in the subject line.

You may also unsubscribe on the account update page at:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/edituinfo.asp

Please email your feedback to The Telecomm Analyst, include TTA in
the subject line at:
investor.feedback@multex.com

Please send your questions and comments to:
investor.help@multex.com

Please email advertising inquiries to us at:
advertise@multex.com

Like a specific article? Now you can send it to a friend with just
a click. Check out the send to a friend feature next to each article.

To advertise in this e-mail, ASK FOR TTA at:
advertise@multex.com


What are deal tickets 299159 and 299192?


This is an automatic confirmation of the order you have placed using IT
Central.

Request Number:   ECTH-4R3SV4
Order For:               Kate Lucas

1 x ( Standard Desktop     $1262 ) Enron IT Purchasing


Dear Power Outage Database Customer,
Attached you will find an excel document. The outages contained within are rescheduled/derated outages. Your daily delivery will still contain these outages.
In addition to the excel document, there is a dbf file that is formatted like the daily delivery you receive nightly. This will enable you to load the data into your regular database. Any questions please let me know. Thanks.
Greg Elliott
IIR, Inc.
713-783-5147 x 3481
outages@industrialinfo.com

THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL IS LEGALLY PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED ABOVE.  YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR COPY OF THIS E-MAIL TO UNAUTHORIZED ENTITIES IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL IN ERROR, PLEASE DELETE IT.
 - OUTAGE.dbf
 - 011602.xls
 - 011602R.xls


Unsubscribe at bottom

Click here to download FREE Collapse demo!

remove me                   privacy
policy

You received this e-mail because you downloaded a RealPlayer®, RealJukebox®, or another product from Real.com™ and indicated a preference to receive special offers from RealNetworks®, or you subscribed to the Special Offers e-mail category in your account area. If you do not wish to receive e-mails from us in the future, click on the "remove me" link above.

RealNetworks, RealPlayer, RealJukebox, Real.com, and RealArcade are trademarks or registered trademarks of RealNetworks, Inc. All other companies or products listed herein are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners.


i think that i am going to take it easy tonight.  i am going to br tomorrow
so i need my rest.  are you going to the lsu game?  i cannot wait to get back
in town.  where are you guys going out afterwards?


Last One!...


----- Forwarded by Miyung Buster/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 09/29/2000 06:01 PM
-----

	djcustomclips@djinteractive.com
	09/27/2000 02:31 PM
	Please respond to nobody

		 To: 86464@WCTOPICS.djnr.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Utilities, Electric: Deregulation: Consumer Outrage in California

Consumer Outrage in California
Al Senia
?
09/30/2000
Utility Business
Copyright 2000 by Intertec Publishing Corporation, a PRIMEDIA Company. All
rights reserved.

Sempra sits on the hot seat as California rides out the effects of its
efforts at deregulation.

Wild fires have swept the western United States this year, but they are
nothing like the fire storm over energy deregulation that has engulfed San
Diego's Sempra Energy. By a quirk of business fate, the 1.2 million customers
of Sempra's San Diego Gas&Electric division in July became the first to
experience fully deregulated electricity rates in California. Electricity
bills instantly doubled and tripled. The expectation was that deregulation
would cause prices to drop, not spike. The resultant outcry threatens to
derail the state's fledgling deregulation program and shape the future of
deregulation nationally. It also situates Sempra squarely on the hot seat at
a time when its profits are on the rise.

Does Sempra deserve to be in this position? Like many other deregulated
utilities around the nation, Sempra is in the midst of transforming itself
from a regulated utility business (SDG&E) to a broad-based energy company
that offers a variety of value-added services. Under the direction of Sempra
President and Chief Executive Officer Stephen L. Baum, that process has been
especially robust. The company has launched a number of domestic and
international strategic initiatives designed to accelerate earnings growth by
an average of 8 percent to 10 percent annually and generate at least
one-third of the earnings from unregulated businesses by 2003.

Baum, who became chairman this month, intends to change the focus of Sempra's
overall business to cope with deregulation. He wants to further diversify the
company, create a strong retail energy business, pursue selective
international investments and capitalize on emerging technologies. "I want
the company...to have a large and diverse customer base nationwide and
worldwide in which we're moving from an asset-intensive business to a
customer- and products- and risk-management-intensive business," says Baum.

So far, the strategy seems to be working - maybe a little too well. Profits
soared 34 percent in the second quarter from $82 million last year to $110
million this year. One big contributor was the Sempra Energy trading
subsidiary, which deals in electricity, natural gas and oil. Its profit
soared in the second quarter this year to $40 million from $3 million in
1999. So far, so good, but the rosy revenues and profit propelled Sempra's
San Diego Gas&Electric to become the first utility in the state to pay off
all its bonds floated to pay for "stranded costs." These are expenses (such
as past massive nuclear power plant investments) incurred in the previously
regulated market that may not be fully recoverable in a competitive market.
Those bond payoffs triggered the full force of the free market, since the
artificial price caps on electricity prices, which were put into place as a
transitional arrangement by the state legislature to make deregulation
politically palatable, automatically expired with the bonds. Since
California's deregulation law required the state's utilities to sell off
their generation businesses and stick to delivering energy, SDGOnow buys its
power in an open market through the California Power Exchange. That
arrangement tends to favor large businesses that can more easily shop for
their electricity supplies. With the bonds paid off, the Sempra division now
passes the full cost of that power to its customers (California's other
utilities are not expected to reach this point until 2002). And with the
demand for power rising in the state while supplies fall short, the cost for
Sempra customers is up. Way up. SDGOis paying as much as 10 times the regular
cost for electricity every time a summer heat wave hits.

Through its success, Sempra pushed the door open into a pure, deregulated
market nearly two years before anyone in California expected it. What
industry executives, politicians, consumer advocates and ratepayers quickly
discovered is that energy demand is rising, there aren't enough power plants
to meet demand and prices are skyrocketing. Even with the higher prices,
there may not be enough electricity to go around. So during hot spells,
rolling one-hour energy blackouts throughout the state became a possibility
for the first time since World War II. Sempra claims it's merely following
the state's deregulation orders, but consumer advocates are outraged that the
parent company (through its trading subsidiary) benefits from energy price
volatility. They want some of the company profits to go back to SDGOto lower
customer utility bills.

That isn't Sempra's (and the other state utility holding companies') only
problem. Bill-burning protests are being organized in downtown San Diego. San
Diego Mayor Susan Goldberg wants the state attorney general to probe whether
there has been "collusion, price fixing or any other inappropriate behavior
in the market price of electricity." The state legislature is being asked to
consider reversing or postponing the deregulation effort. Some legislators
have launched an effort to roll back utility rates. The architect of the
deregulation law is under fire for alleged close ties to the utility
companies. State Public Utility Commission member Carl Wood calls
deregulation a mistake and accuses unnamed power players of profiteering at
the consumer's expense.

Even California Gov. Gray Davis has gotten critical. "Californians are
willing to pay their fair share of the cost for a reliable supply of
electricity, but I believe the current situation is unjust and totally
unacceptable," Davis says. He successfully pushed the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission to investigate wholesale energy prices in the western
United States, believing it would lead to short-term federal price controls.
The governor also proposed a plan in mid-August to the Public Utility
Commission that would average consumers' bills over a 12-month period to make
monthly statements predictable. He says deregulation can work, but not until
supply and demand come into balance and "until electricity generators act
responsibly." It's no wonder Davis wants the feds involved - the state
doesn't have much power over power anymore now that deregulation has become
state law.

Despite Davis' hopes, a supply balance isn't likely to return to California
anytime soon. The state's last major power plant, a nuclear facility at
Diablo Canyon, went online 15 years ago. Since then, the state's population
has grown by 8 million, and 3.5 million new jobs have been created. Four new
plants are under construction, but that isn't enough to meet escalating
demand, and the first plant won't come online for a year. Meanwhile, market
uncertainty - and increasing calls for reregulation - aren't doing much to
attract new power plant investment. Reliant Energy Inc., for example, has
backed off a plan to build a plant in Barstow, Calif. Calpine Corp. wants to
build a power plant in San Jose, the center of Silicon Valley, but the effort
is strongly opposed by local businesses and residents. A 700-megawatt plant
proposed for a desert area is mired down in a regulatory morass. However,
Duke Energy North America, which purchased several state power plants in
1998, expects to invest more than $1 billion to build and expand power plants
in California over the next four years.

Sempra's Plans Sempra has its own view of the escalating imbroglio. Baum
wants the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to determine if the power
market is being manipulated and then step in if necessary and set wholesale
energy prices. He also believes utilities, with Public Utility Commission
approval, should install time-of-use meters throughout the state so customers
could control their own power load. Baum also suggests that the Public
Utility Commission allow SDGOto purchase futures contracts for its customers.
Baum wants the authority to aggregate SDGOcustomers (if they choose) into one
"market" to get a better price. Meanwhile, he's hoping the controversy won't
derail Sempra's business plans.

These plans include six strategic directions: expanding the retail energy
services business; exporting its traditional utility experience overseas;
boosting the energy trading business; selectively developing supporting
generation; capitalizing on emerging technologies like the Internet and the
applications services business; and focusing the core utility company on
energy delivery.

Baum intends to spend $4 billion in capital investment during the next four
years with delivery services getting half that amount and the international
and retail operations equally splitting another $1.5 billion. Baum estimates
Sempra's energy trading business will bring in $40 million to $55 million in
profit by 2003. It's already well ahead of that pace for this year, but the
business is highly volatile. International operations will generate another
$40 million to $60 million in annual profit in four years. Sempra's retail
energy business, operated as Sempra Energy Solutions, will generate between
$30 million and $70 million, he estimates. "Ultimately, I think the big
opportunity in the utility business we are in lies with this industrial,
commercial residential mass market and the products and services
business,"Baum says.

International operations look to be another key strategic area for Sempra, in
part due to the company's location near the Mexico border. It has made
significant natural gas investments in northern Mexico. The division
develops, owns and operates energy projects and provides natural gas and
electricity energy services for 2.5 million customers in Argentina, Canada,
Chile, Mexico, Peru and Uruguay. Baum says it is pursuing new opportunities
in Latin America. "International is a much more traditional utility business
(than other new businesses Sempra is getting into)," Baum says. "We look to
(invest in) areas with a high rate of growth, 6 percent or more, in stable
economies. We think those are good investments. We have more than $1 billion
invested internationally, usually in partnerships."

Some analysts view the international business as inherently risky given the
possibility of political and economic change. Baum disagrees. "We think on a
risk-adjusted basis this is a good, solid, growing business," he says. "All
our (international) businesses are making money. We are not in a loss
condition in any of our international operations. They make their expected
returns and their cash flow. It's the kind of business we have done for
years."

Baum is optimistic that the new Sempra can deliver strong performance as it
refocuses on a deregulated world.  Analysts seem pleased. "They have a
well-developed, well thought-out strategy," says David Maccarone, vice
president of New York-based Goldman Sachs&Co. "The latest financial
performance is impressive." Maccarone adds that the trading business is
benefiting from "highly favorable market conditions that are not
sustainable." Overall, the international business is doing well. The only
dark cloud? The aftermath of California deregulation. "There's an uncertain
regulatory climate in California," he says. "It's never been regarded as a
favorable state to do business in from a utility perspective. Still, I'm
optimistic there won't be a substantial negative impact."

Meanwhile, the controversy is bringing back bad memories. In the 1970s,
before Sempra existed, SDGOwas notorious for high rates. The utility was so
unpopular that officials painted over the company logo on its truck fleet.
Baum is trying to stop that from happening again. Maccarone believes Sempra
is a victim of its own success. "They recovered their liability faster than
other California utilities," he says. "Now they are getting branded for it."

Folder Name: Utilities, Electric: Deregulation
Relevance Score on Scale of 100: 98

______________________________________________________________________
To review or revise your folder, visit Dow Jones CustomClipsor contact Dow
Jones Customer  Service by e-mail at custom.news@bis.dowjones.comor by phone
at 800-369-7466. (Outside the U.S. and  Canada, call 609-452-1511 or contact
your local sales representative.)
______________________________________________________________________
Copyright (c) 2000 Dow Jones &Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved


I thought Bob's email was cute.  I asked him to get me our deals numbers for
the El Paso assignment, and he sent me the following...
---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 02/04/2000 04:09 PM
---------------------------

Bob Bowen
02/04/2000 03:58 PM
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: El Paso assignment

Hope this one looks better than the first e-mail

Here are the EOL Number's         Most
                  Innovative
El Paso # EOL #  Sitara#  TAGG # Zip Code Area Code Rank

I-212948 75240  150545  n/a  77002       713       1

I-212470 76566  151959  n/a  77002       713         1

I-212471 76807  152169  n/a  77002       713       1

I-212744 77496  152682  n/a  77002       713       1

P/P-00539 78556  153867  N81009  77002       713       1

P/P00540 78567  153639  N81012  77002       713       1

I-212748 79134  154152  n/a  77002       713       1

P/P-00541 80206  155119  N82642  77002       713       1

Sorry, I got carried away with numbers.