Louise & John:
We have just recently completed a three year storage transaction with Centana Stg.  The demand charge is around $108,00 each month.  We are currently filling the storage with plans to inject 500,000 MMbtu in September and October.  This would mean cash payments for gas of around $1,250,000 in October and the same in November.

	Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Martin, Thomas A.
Sent:	Wednesday, September 12, 2001 12:54 PM
To:	Schwieger, Jim
Subject:	FW: End of quarter Funds Flow Targets

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Wednesday, September 12, 2001 12:06 PM
To:	Allen, Phillip K.; Arnold, John; Arora, Harry; Baughman, Edward D.; Belden, Tim; Black, Don; Breslau, Craig; Calger, Christopher F.; Collonges, Remi; Colwell, Wes; Davies, Derek; Davis, Mark Dana; Dayao, Anthony; Deffner, Joseph; Devries, Paul; Duran, W. David; Dutt, Ranabir; Forster, David; Foster, Chris H.; Gonzalez, Orlando; Grigsby, Mike; Haedicke, Mark E.; Herndon, Rogers; Josey, Scott; Keel, Allan; Kishkill, Joe; Kitagawa, Kyle; Kitchen, Louise; Lagrasta, Fred; Luce, Laura; Martin, Thomas A.; Mcdonald, Michael; McMichael Jr., Ed; Miller, Don (Asset Mktg); Milnthorp, Rob; Mrha, Jean; Neal, Scott; Parquet, David; Presto, Kevin M.; Redmond, Brian; Shively, Hunter S.; Sturm, Fletcher J.; Swerzbin, Mike; Thomas, Jake; Thompson, John; Tricoli, Carl; Tycholiz, Barry; Vickers, Frank W.; Whitt, Mark; Wiggs, Brett; Wolfe, Greg; Zipper, Andy; Zufferli, John
Cc:	Deffner, Joseph; Lavorato, John
Subject:	End of quarter Funds Flow Targets

As we approach the end of the quarter we are closely monitoring our funds flow targets for Enron Americas.  We would like you to let us know if you are planning to enter into any transactions within your groups which will impact those targets, either positively or negatively.  We would like information on all deals which impact significantly our funds flow targets prior to you entering into them.  Please note that this is not just structured transactions but even a storage transaction where we would be injecting would involve cash going out of Enron.

Enron's cash liquidity position is very strong and there is not an issue of whether or not we enter into a transaction but we must ensure we correctly price any transactions and indeed send clear signals to the orginators and traders with regards to our funds flow targets.

Please let John or Louise know if you have any transactions which may occur with funds flow implications.  Should you need any indications of pricing, please contact Joe Deffner.

Louise & John


Nedre:

We have interviewed four candidates so far and may be able to decide on one
of them - the group will be meeting early next week to discuss everyone's
reactions to the interviews.  If you have other resumes we would be happy to
look at them - my own view is that while these candidates would be OK, they
are not superstars (like the person we are losing).

Mark

	From:  Nedre Strambler                           04/21/2000 10:35 AM

To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: candidates

Mark,

I was wondering how close you and your group are to making a decision
on the Paralegal position.   I know you have seen some candidates.  Would you
like
to continue to see more or do you want to choose from the pool that you have
already seen?

I haven't heard much feedback (evaluation sheets or email) from the
interviewing group, and
I need to know what you all think of the candidates.  Please let me know
where we are at your
earliest convenience.

Thanks,
Nedre Strambler
31659


bet


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/26/2001
04:47 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  V Charles Weldon                           01/22/2001 09:18 AM

To: Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson
Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Turnover Document


Start Date: 1/30/02; HourAhead hour: 14;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002013014.txt


Jim, I had a brief conversation with Mark regarding your concerns on
legal-accounting firms which we will visit on in March when we talk.  In the
meantime, if Alan has not already spoken to Ron, Alan please speak to Fred
Erickson at Stikeman Elliott (403.266.9016) and I will call Ron and tell him
that for various reasons we will be using someone else on this matter.

Regards, Peter.
---------------------- Forwarded by Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT on 03/01/2001 02:41
PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources
	Canada Corp.

	From:  Peter Keohane                           03/01/2001 01:48 PM

To: James Derrick/Enron@EnronXGate
cc: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Powell/CAL/ECT@ECT
Subject: Houston Retainer

Jim/Mark, Alan called me looking for the name of Alberta/Canadian counsel to
assist him on short notice with respect to some lien financing and title
transfer issues affecting a transaction he is working on.  I gave him Ron
Deyholos' name at Donahue Ernst & Young, who works in this area and who is
very responsive, although I advised Alan that I could give him the names of a
number of lawyers at Oslers, Stikemans, Blakes or Bennett Jones.  If you have
concerns, please let Alan or me know ASAP.

Thanks and regards, Peter.


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 03/27/2001 02:43 PM -----

	Ursula Brenner
	03/23/2001 04:03 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: SMethodist Presentation

Steve,

Jeff is talking at SMU Management Briefing Series on March 27th.  The
organizers wanted him to talk about his background and career at Enron and
about where the industry is heading.  The presentation covers this last
piece.  The audience will be local business people and some SMU students and
professors (350-400 people)

Jeff already reviewed this presentation.  Please, let me know if you have any
questions or suggestions.

Thanks,

Ursula Brenner
ENRON CORP.
+1(713)345-3787

This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information
intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law.  If
you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and are
hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.
---------------------- Forwarded by Ursula Brenner/NA/Enron on 03/23/2001
04:00 PM ---------------------------

Katrina Burton
03/23/2001 03:43 PM
Sent by: Katrina Burton
To: Ursula Brenner/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: SMethodist Presentation


Kevin,

Jeff and Susan are in our tax group and have a question stated below
regarding the interconnects to ML7.

Chris
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Walker/HOU/ECT on 04/09/2001 02:36
PM ---------------------------
From: Jeff Blumenthal/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/09/2001 02:07 PM
To: Chris Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Susan Musch/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject: FW: Sigma Factor Request (US Gas Phy Fwd Secondary Firm)

Chris,

Can you let Susan and me know exactly where the ML7 interconnects are located?

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Walker, Chris
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 1:22 PM
To: Adams, Matthew; Hayden, Frank
Cc: Lees, Lisa; Sever, Stephanie; Sweitzer, Tara; Kenne, Dawn; Moorer,
Torrey; Gockerman, Matthew F.; Blumenthal, Jeff; Musch, Susan; Lozano, Melba;
Meredith, Kevin; Cass, Robert
Subject: Sigma Factor Request (US Gas Phy Fwd Secondary Firm)

Matt or Frank,

Please provide a sigma factor for the following product type requested by
Kevin Ruscitti:

US Gas Phy Fwd Secondary Firm

A US gas transaction with Enron North America Corp., under which Seller shall
sell and Buyer shall purchase a quantity of natural gas equal to the Daily
Contract Quantity at the Contract Price on a Secondary Firm basis.  The
Contract Price shall be as submitted by Counterparty via the Website.  The
Period of Delivery shall be from the Effective Date through the Termination
Date.
The term of the Transaction shall be from the Effective Date to the
Termination Date. The Effective Date is 01 May 2001. The Termination Date is
31 May 2001.
The Transaction is for delivery at an ANR Pipeline Company ML7 interconnect.
The Purchaser will determine at what ML7 interconnect to take delivery.  The
volumes Delivered by the Seller are subject to reductions due to operational
constraints on the ANR Pipeline system. In the event that scheduled volumes
are reduced due to pipeline operational constraints, Buyer will designate an
alternate ML7 delivery location until an unconstrained point is designated.
In the event that the Buyer cannot take receipt at an alternative ML7 point,
the Buyer must arrange for the gas to be delivered off-system, stored or
parked at the Buyer's expense. These reductions due to Pipeline System
constraints are not considered a failure to perform by the Purchaser.
The price is quoted in US Dollars per unit of volume, which will be the
Contractual Currency.
The unit of measure against which the price is quoted shall be millions of
British thermal units and the quantity shown shall be in millions of BTUs per
day.

Thanks,

CW
3-7533


Good Morning!

Bottom line: No Changes.

For the near term (1-5), we see some cool anomalies arriving into the Dakotas by Monday already, with highs in the Dakotas in the mid-30s and lows in the mid-teens.By Tuesday, Texas and the Midwest will be in the below normal category, with Dallas overnights in the mid-30s (normal low 43), Houston's low in the mid-40s (normal upper-40s) and Chicago will freeze, with a mid-20 overnight.  Progressing into the Northeast by wednesday, Philly and New York will get into the below normal category, but 5 or 6 degree anomalies are most likely.  Looks like a three day event as it moves easterly and then is followed by moderation into the...

6-10 Day time period, which will see a cool shot over the Midwest/East towards next weekend, moderating again by early the following week. Then, early in the...

11-15 Day time period, more cool air moves in, beginning with central cooling, then even into the Southeast.

So, with normals dropping across the nation, this first cool air anomaly event arriving in the Midwest by Tuesday will elevate the nation's gas demand requirements into the 60 Bcf/d plus regime from here on through the winter.  Here's the strip beginning with today:

Sat 	11/17	47 Bcfd
Sun	11/18	52 Bcfd
Mon	11/19	55 Bcfd
Tue	11/20	67 Bcfd
Wed	11/21	69 Bcfd
Thu	11/22	65 Bcfd
Fri	11/23	65 Bcfd
Sat	11/24	63 Bcfd
Sun	11/25	63 Bcfd
Mon	11/26	65 Bcfd
Tue	11/27	65 Bcfd

Till tomorrow,

The Weather Team


Attached in Word and WordPerfect is a draft of the A&K General Opinion marked
against the McGarret C transaction.

Chris Krecek, Secretary/Legal Assistant
Andrews & Kurth L.L.P.
1717 Main Street, Suite 3700
Dallas, Texas 75201
Phone: (214) 659-4481
Fax: (214) 659-4401
Email: ckrecek@andrews-kurth.com

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  The information in this e-mail (including any
attachments) is confidential, legally privileged and intended only for the
use of each recipient named above.  If you are not an intended recipient, you
must not read, use or disseminate this information.  If you have received
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail
and delete this e-mail from your computer.
VIRUS WARNING:  Although this e-mail (including any attachments) is not
intended to contain any virus or defect that may affect your computer, you
are responsible for ensuring that no virus or defect exists.  The sender
disclaims any responsibility for any loss or damages arising from any virus
or defect associated with this e-mail.

 - 260177.wpd
 - 260177.doc


Hey -- you're talking about our future President!  I am soooo looking forward
to my next Biennial Resource Planning proceeding.
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/HOU/EES on 08/03/2000 07:03
PM ---------------------------

Richard Shapiro
08/02/2000 10:55 AM
To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: slashing price caps

---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES on 08/02/2000
10:55 AM ---------------------------

"Foster, Gary" <GFoster@Antigenics.com> on 08/02/2000 09:39:50 AM
To: "Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)" <jdasovic@enron.com>, "Sue Mara (E-mail)"
<smara@enron.com>, "'mona.petrochko@enron.com'" <mona.petrochko@enron.com>
cc: "'richard.shapiro@enron.com'" <richard.shapiro@enron.com>
Subject: slashing price caps

I'm so glad that our guy, Grey Davis, was elected so that he can un-do what
little advancement was made in that horrible idea of letting markets work.


John,

Just finished the continous trading case.   Please see
the two attached files. Let me know if you want to add
more scenarios.

Happy holidays !

Zimin

---------------- Attachment ------------------

Open-close trading:

Close-close trading:


Enron Europe has decided to pursue this claim. How involved would you like me
to be?
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 12/05/99
01:44 PM ---------------------------

Jon Chapman
11/10/99 09:50 AM
To: Mark Frevert/LON/ECT@ECT, Danny McCarty/LON/ECT@ECT, John
Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Matthew Scrimshaw/LON/ECT@ECT, Michael R Brown/LON/ECT@ECT, Richard B
Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Warranty claim by Enron Teesside Operations Limited against ICI
Chemicals & Polymers Limited ("ICI")

PRIVILEGED ATTORNEY - CLIENT COMMUNICATION  : CONFIDENTIAL

Mark / Dan / John

As you are aware , earlier this year , we served formal notices of two
potential warranty claims ( re. the Halochems. closure and the DuPont reduced
steam-take ) on ICI , as required by the Sale of Business Agreement . We have
subsequently prepared a detailed draft analysis and costing of our claims
(the "Particulars of Claim") which has been served on ICI's lawyers , Herbert
Smith . They have come back with some requests for supporting documentation
which we are currently dealing with.

The Sale of Business Agreement requires us , unless ICI agree to settle which
seems highly unlikely at this stage , to issue formal court proceedings
against ICI before 21 November in respect of the Halochems. claim and before
17 December in respect of DuPont  . We wish to deal with the two claims
together and , accordingly , it is proposed that we issue proceedings , at
latest , on 16 November . Issue puts us into a formal procedural timetable .
ICI would have 14 days to reply indicating whether they wish to defend and a
further 14 days to issue a defence , though this period is generally capable
of being extended by a further 28 days . The process of discovery , whereby
each side has the opportunity to examine relevant documentation in the
possession of the other , would probably begin after 3 months or so . If we
were to go to full trial , this could be in the second half of next year .

If we don't issue proceedings before the relevant dates , we lose the right
to bring the relevant claim completely unless ICI has waived the requirement
that we issue proceedings by these dates , which they have shown no
inclination to do.The downside of issuing proceedings is that , whilst we are
entitled to withdraw them at any stage if we decide not to proceed with the
claims , we would then be liable for much of ICI's legal costs from the date
of issue to the date of withdrawal .  Our lawyers' view  is that , were we to
go to full trial and lose , the potential aggregate liability for ETOL's
legal costs and ICI's legal costs would be between o1 million and o1.5
million (our current costs are around o70 , 000 ).

In terms of the chances of success of our claims were we to go to full trial
, I believe  , and am advised , that the DuPont reduced steam-take claim is
more likely to succeed than the Halochems. shutdown claim . Given the legal
complexities of contractual warranty claims , I do not think it would be wise
, at this stage , to be overly confident of success at full trial . However ,
there is certainly , in my view , good potential for achieving a settlement
with ICI which may involve more than simply a cash payment (eg restructuring
of key contracts , land deals etc. ) .We do know that , as a matter of
practice , ICI ignore potential claims unless proceedings have been issued .
Issue of proceedings should , thus , be viewed primarily , at this stage , as
a necessary means of getting ICI to the negotiating table . Their costs will
not ramp up significantly until discovery starts , so we should be ready to
monitor closely and constantly our prospects in the litigation as against our
potential exposure should we withdraw or lose .

On the basis of the above , I would recommend that proceedings are issued
against ICI and would very much welcome your views or comments on this.

Regards.

Jon


Sure; I think we can do that now.  I thought we might approach it as we organize each file on a counterparty basis but we certainly do not need to wait.  However, we will not be able to reconcile trades, etc. until we have the credit review for each counterparty and I expect that this may be a hindrance.

Sara

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Aronowitz, Alan
Sent:	Tuesday, February 12, 2002 10:45 AM
To:	Panus, Stephanie
Cc:	Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	RE: Counterparty Calculations

Sara:

FYI.

Do you think we should begin the process of sending letters asking for back-up from the counterparties who have sent us termination payment notices, but where we believe we are in-the-money?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Panus, Stephanie
Sent:	Wednesday, February 06, 2002 2:31 PM
To:	Aronowitz, Alan
Subject:	Counterparty Calculations

Attached is a list of the counterparties who have provided termination payment calculations.  I have identified whether or not such counterparty provided backup to its calculation, but obviously cannot determine if such backup is sufficient.  For all new notices, backup will be identified when the notice is recorded on the termination log.  I did not look at the ECC or London entities.  For the US entities, we have begun to make files for those counterparties who submitted a calculation, but the files only contain the termination notices at this time.  As I understand, we will be focusing on the non-terminated in-the-money, then the terminated in-the-money.  Therefore, we have not begun pulling the contracts for these counterparties.

 << File: Counterparty Calculations.xls >>

We have been concentrating on the non-terminated in-the-money financial contracts.  For each counterparty, we are pulling 1) the financial agreement, 2) all financial confirmations live as of November 30, 2001, 3) any physical agreements for that counterparty, and 4) any physical confirmations live as of November 30.

Stephanie Panus
Enron Wholesale Services
ph:  713.345.3249
fax:  713.646.3490


Prebon
missing richter - 550490

missing crandall - 550480

missing swerzbin - 550438

550428 - killed

550427 - still waiting to hear

Stephanie Piwetz   03/14/2001 02:26 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: checkout

Kate:
3/14/01 checkout
Amerex;
Swerzbin Deal 550427.01   amerex said name might ch due to credit, please let
us know.

Prebon:
Missing  crandell
Enron Buys Morgan
285.00
May mid c
  25 mws

550428.01 Swerzbin (no other broker claimed deal)
Prebon no show
Enron buys morgan
apr  mid c  281

missing swerzbin  believe deal 550438.01, just enterd
Enron buys pac mid c bal 275.00

missing richter
enron buys sempra
june np 15   25mws


CALENDAR ENTRY:	REMINDER

Description:
	Russell on call

Date:		7/21/2001
Time:		8:00 AM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Stacey W White

Detailed Description:


We will be able to attend the Questar Southern Trails data room on Monday and Tuesday (Oct 29th and 30th) as originally planned.  If you only need one day, please let me know which day you'll be attending.

Questar is located at 180 East 100 South, Salt Lake City, Utah.  Our main contacts are Jodi Starley at (801) 324-2082 and Gary Schmitt at (801) 324-2082. The hours of the data room are 8:00 - 4:00.

They are looking at our data request and working to make sure they can accomodate us.  Also,  Engineers available for interviewing are only available on Monday.  Legal staff needed to be interviewed are only available on Tuesday.  If there are other staff that are needed for interviews, please let me know.

Some attendees are staying at the Salt Lake City MARRIOTT SALT LAKE CITY, 75 S. West Temple, Salt Lake City, UT 84101 Phone: 1-801-531-0800 FAX: 1-801-532-4127
 for Sunday and Monday nights.  You need to make your own travel reservations and it is advised that you do that as soon as possible.

The Bid for Southern Trails West Leg) is due December 10th.

I show the following people going to the data room:

1.	L.D. Stephens - Team Leader/Operations
2.	Larry Campbell - Environmental
3.	Larry Gleffe - ROW
4.	Mike Ames - Pipeline Safety
5.	Warren Schick - Property Tax
6.	Bob Chandler - Finance
7.	Stephen Dowd - Corp Dev
8.	Kim Watson - Marketing
9.   Mark McConnell - Marketing

Please let me know if this list needs any corrections.

Mark

Mark McConnell
Transwestern Pipeline Company
713-345-7896   office
713-822-4862   cell
713-646-2551   fax
mark.mcconnell@enron.com


The location is NBPL/Ventura TP/08NBPL Ventura Transfer PT
PL

---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 04/05/2001
12:38 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kam Keiser                           04/05/2001 07:52 AM

To: Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: NBPL Ventura Mapping

---------------------- Forwarded by Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT on 04/05/2001 07:49 AM
---------------------------

Dawn C Kenne
04/04/2001 06:06 PM
To: Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: NBPL Ventura Mapping

I am still waiting on this.........please help.

DW
---------------------- Forwarded by Dawn C Kenne/HOU/ECT on 04/04/2001 05:57
PM ---------------------------

Dawn C Kenne
04/02/2001 03:49 PM
To: Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Chris Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tara Sweitzer/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: NBPL Ventura Mapping

Kam,

Please provide the pipe, trading zone, and meter/facility for the new
location listed below.

Thanks,
Dawn

Chris Walker
04/02/2001 03:47 PM
To: Dawn C Kenne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tara Sweitzer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: NBPL Ventura Mapping

Dawn and Tara,

Please map the following new location in TEST when you have a chance.

NBPL - Ventura Transfer Point

I created a product 14518 in TEST.

Thanks,

CW
3-7533


Hi Vince,

Thanks for the e-mail.  We have included live links to price curves through
Reuters quotes via Telerate Bridge but we still have static curves for gold
and cocoa.  Kirstee is talking to Andreas in NY to obtain position files on a
daily basis, addressing point 2) in your e-mail, as well as looking into
longer term integration issues.  Cantekin and I have agreed the correct
correlations for the metals between us, but Cantekin is currently checking
the correlations for silver and gold.  Preliminary results based on positions
as of 19th July are as follows:

We noticed that position mapping at the front months can change VaR
significantly.

As you stated, Kirstee Hewitt will now be assuming responsibility for further
modifications to the model on the London side and to this end I have ensured
that Kirstee is put in touch with key personnel like Andreas (Andreas will be
in the London office next week) and has access to all the information she
needs.

Regards,

Anjam Ahmad
Research
x35383

SPREADSHEET:


Linda LIndsay
llindsay@whidbey.com

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Linda LIndsay


Testing Notes capabilities of your Enron home computer.


Here is the wh data.  I have included the file for February only.  Keep in
mind that some deals, such as Costilla, have multiple tickets in the system
so it is impossible to estimate accrual revenue/expense in the system
accurately.  I have made top level adjustments to these deals.


Start Date: 3/2/01; HourAhead hour: 24;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001030224.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 24 / Preferred:  20.00 / Final:  19.88)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: TOSCO
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 3/2/01
  UNIT_ID: UNCHEM_1_UNIT
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 24 / Preferred:   0.00 / Final:   1.18)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EES
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 3/2/01
  UNIT_ID: BADLND_7_PL1X2
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 24 / Preferred:  29.00 / Final:  27.91)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ARCO
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 3/2/01
  UNIT_ID: CARBGN_6_UNIT 1


Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490

----- Forwarded by Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT on 06/08/2000 05:00 PM -----

	Sylvia Hu@ENRON
	06/08/2000 11:28 AM

		 To: Clement Abrams/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tobin Alland/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jim
Armogida/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ann Ballard/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Berg/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sharon Butcher/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Eickenroht/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Carol Essig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kelly Noel
Higgason/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mark Holsworth/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Zulema
Ibarra/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sharon Morgan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tanja
Murray/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Nutt/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cindy
Richardson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rex Rogers/Corp/Enron@Enron, Frank
Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kriste Sullivan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ava
Syon/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Linda S Trevino/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Charles
Cheek/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rita Bahner/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gay
Arnold/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tracy Carter/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Britt
Davis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Grant/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Eileen
Kisluk/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Michelle Lawless/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Brenda
McAfee/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lisa Robichaux/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathy
Siess/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Becky Stephens/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Angela
Villagomez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert Vote/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bonnie
White/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Becky Zikes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Marianne
Castano/HOU/EES@EES, Karen A Cordova/HOU/EES@EES, Patrick G
Grant/HOU/EES@EES, James E Keller/HOU/EES@EES, Michelle Maynard/HOU/EES@EES,
Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Robbi Rossi/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Lori Pinder/HOU/EES@EES, Christina
Finelli/HOU/EES@EES, Elizabeth Linnell/HOU/EES@EES, Andrew Wu/HOU/EES@EES,
Bill Rapp/HOU/EES@EES, Danny Clark/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Freed/HOU/EES@EES,
Jennifer Hillegonds/HOU/EES@EES, Susan Wheeler/HOU/EES@EES, David K
Bargainer/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michelle
Blaine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Julia H
Chin/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, George Frumkin/SA/Enron@Enron,
Robert H George/SA/Enron@Enron, Johan
Gerrese/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Lauren
Hagerty/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, James A
Hughes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Laurie
Lee/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sean
Long/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Bruce
Lundstrom/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Vicky Martinez/SA/Enron@Enron,
Neil D Meyer/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Janet H Moore/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Nancy
Muchmore/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Bonnie
Nelson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John Novak/SA/Enron@Enron, Diana
Parker/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Edson Pavao/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Frank Sayre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Hong
Shen/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rob
Walls/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robert C
Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, trandyyoung/sa/enron@ECT,
Paulette Obrecht/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Elizabeth
Lay/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Daniel R Rogers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
John Viverito/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kathleen
Carnahan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Suzanne A
Kelly/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Connie Castillo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Yao Apasu/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Edwin
Essandoh/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, William
Krenz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Bonnie
Nelson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Andrew Ralston/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
David L Roland/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Tami
Scrudder/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Gerry Willis/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Denise
Almoina/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Martha
Braddy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Nancy
Corbet/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ned E
Crady/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Luis Derrota/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Darlene McKeever/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Miguel
Mendoza/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Larry
Pardue/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Carlos
Ryerson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Gail
Brownfeld/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, David
Barru/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Scott
Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, David Lund/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Kay Mann/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Juliana
Sherman/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Deborah
Rogers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Gareth Bahlmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Teresa G Bushman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob
Carter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marilyn Colbert/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Betty J Coneway/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shonnie Daniel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter del Vecchio/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenton Erwin/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Genia FitzGerald/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nony Flores/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shawna
Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda
R Guinn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marie Heard/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Ed B Hearn III/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary J
Heinitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen E
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Monica Jordan
Richards/HOU/ECT@ECT, Deb Korkmas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda L Lawrence/HOU/EES@EES,
Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Travis McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janice R
Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jason Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Linda J Noske/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melinda
Pharms/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael A
Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B
Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lance Schuler-Legal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Yaron Shaham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa
Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ann Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda
Whitehead/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Young/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Becky Tlucek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Ogden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Wayne Gresham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet H Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Ogden/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Gillaspie/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan
Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberlee A
Bennick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barton Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roger Balog/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lou
Stoler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anne C Koehler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Taffy Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Laurie Mayer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari Mao/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Johnston/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Martin W Penkwitz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Matt Maxwell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kristina
Mordaunt/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Michelle Hicks/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Robin Hill/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Cynthia Harkness/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
JoAnne Garner/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Enron Global
Finance, Eric Benson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Janet Butler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dari
Dornan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lee Huber/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Frazier
King/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Candace Kyle/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dorothy
McCoppin/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bret
Reich/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Staci
Holtzman/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michael
Moran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kathy Ringblom/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Philip
Crowley/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Louis Soldano/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Colleen
Raker/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tony Pryor/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kim
Wilkie/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Elizabeth Linnell/HOU/EES@EES, Margo
Reyna/HOU/EES@EES, Stephanie McMurray/HOU/EES@EES
		 cc:
		 Subject: Lexis Presents Cyberlaw & Telecommunications

What are some legal issues we should be aware of as e Business/eTrade change
our way to do business?   Do you know Lexis Search Advisor?  Please join Ed
Chang, Lexis attorney for a Cyberlaw & Telecommunications presentation in
Conference Room EB 47C2 on Tuesday, 6/20 from 12:00 noon to 1:30 PM.   Lexis
provides lunch.  R.S.V.P. to Sylvia Hu x36775 by noon, Monday (6/19).

Thanks,
Sylvia Hu
Corporate and Law Information Services
x36775

   Come discover LEXIS-NEXIS and it,s vast
 collection of information on
CYBERLAW and TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Learn how to monitor the latest cases and legislation in these emerging areas
of law.

Find out what new cyberlaw journals
LEXIS-NEXIS has recently acquired.

See how easy it is to locate FCC Cases,
FCC Licenses, PUC Decisions and Reports,
and Telecommunications News.

Watch as LEXIS-NEXIS SEARCH ADVISOR practically does all of your research for
you.


---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 02/11/2000
04:01 PM ---------------------------

Judy Hernandez on 02/11/2000 03:59:57 PM
To: Su, HERNAN@LLGM.COM
cc:
Subject: Powerful!!!!

---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 02/11/2000
03:58 PM ---------------------------

Amber Ebow
02/11/2000 03:27 PM
To: Anthony Campos/HOU/ECT, jchadwick-joshua@worldnet.att.net,
angiec81@aol.com, smchadwic@yahoo.com, theresachadwick@hotmail.com,
bdouglas@sfasu.edu, larry_johnson@dci-ltd.com,
lee_johnson_@notes.seagate.com, kincadam@aol.com, mlittle@aol.com,
gmatth@coair.com, pell-shell@aol.com, mjpierson@netzero.com,
fwells@ascap.com, Kim Washington <washington@camdenprop.com>
cc: kechadwi@TexasChildrensHospital.org, rjackson@admin4.hsc.uth.tmc.edu,
sjohnson@urbanjustice.org, smorgan@pmigroup.com, carlao@bellsouth.net,
lyric_mase@hotmail.com, "Bowden, Neinka S" <nbowden@bcm.tmc.edu>, "Angela
Washington" <a-washington1@ti.com>, Shundea
Thrower<shundea.thrower@wcom.com>, Michelle Neville/HOU/ECT@ECT, Regina
Blackshear/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shyril L
Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Albert Escamilla/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Powerful!!!!

---------------------- Forwarded by Amber Ebow/HOU/ECT on 02/11/2000 03:23 PM
---------------------------

Julissa Marron@ENRON
02/11/2000 03:21 PM
To: Marilyn Rivera/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patrick Marron
<Patrick.Marron@aspentech.com>, Tiffany La Dang
<tiffany@eubanks-architects.com>, "Linda Stevens" <lstevens@wt.net>, Faye
Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marvia Jefferson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amber Ebow/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Stacey Barclay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lynette
Malone/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Powerful!!!!

---------------------- Forwarded by Julissa Marron/Corp/Enron on 02/11/2000
03:19 PM ---------------------------

Subject: Powerful!!!!

 - ATT00032.jpg


Hello all,

Please complete our preliminary feedback form so that we can track the value
of our investment in the Enron/Guggenheim event(s). We will use your input to
shape our future business development opportunities.

Thank you in advance for providing this valuable information.  Please fax
your response to me at 713-853-6790.


AGENT JH/VA BOOKING REF
YVVYL7

                                          SANDERS/RICHARD B

  ENRON
  1400 SMITH
  HOUSTON TX 77002
  TWANDA SWEET X39402

  DATE:  OCT 24 2001

SERVICE               DATE  FROM           TO             DEPART
ARRIVE

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES  29OCT HOUSTON TX     WASHINGTON DC  120P    512P
CO 232     A          MON   G.BUSH INTERCO R REAGAN NAT
                            TERMINAL C     TERMINAL B
                                                          NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         2:52 DURATION
                  AIRCRAFT: BOEING 737-500

HOTEL                 29OCT MARRIOTT JW HOTEL
                      31OCT 1331 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE
                            WASHINGTON, DC 20004
                            UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                            TELEPHONE: 1-202 3932000
                            FAX: 1-202 6266991
                            CONFIRMATION: 80473590
                            REFERENCE: CORA00
                            SINGLE ROOM
                            RATE: COR USD 199.00 PER NIGHT
                            GUARANTEE GIVEN

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES  31OCT WASHINGTON DC  HOUSTON TX     740A    955A
CO 227     A          WED   R REAGAN NAT   G.BUSH INTERCO
                            TERMINAL B     TERMINAL C
                                                          NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         3:15 DURATION
                  AIRCRAFT: BOEING 737-500

RESERVATION NUMBER(S)  CO/VNC9GD

CO  FREQUENT FLYER COTP028685
*CONTINENTAL RECORD LOCATOR: VNC9GD
***********************************************
THIS IS A TICKETLESS RESERVATION. PLEASE HAVE A
PICTURE ID AVAILABLE AT THE AIRPORT. THANK YOU
CONTINENTAL 005-7035412661/ETCO/USD1860.00/22OCT01
                  THANK YOU FOR CALLING VITOL TRAVEL

=====
VITOL TRAVEL
713 FARGO AVENUE
HOUSTON TX 77006
713-526-0633-NEW NUMBER
1 800-724-7002

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
http://personals.yahoo.com


Bad development.  We are trying to get Steve an appointment with Smith next
Tuesday.
----- Forwarded by Linda Robertson/NA/Enron on 03/15/2001 03:51 PM -----

	Allison Navin
	03/15/2001 03:46 PM

		 To: Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Senators Dianne Feinstein and Gordon Smith Announce Partnership in
Response to the Western Energy Crisis

Senators Dianne Feinstein and Gordon Smith
Announce Partnership in Response to the Western Energy Crisis
March 15, 2001
Washington, DC - Senators Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) and Gordon Smith (R-OR)
today announced an agreement to introduce bipartisan legislation to restore
stability and reliability to the Western energy market by directing the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to impose a temporary &just and
reasonable8 wholesale rate cap or cost-of-service based rates.
The legislation will also require the states involved in this effort to pass
on the cost of the electricity to retail customers. However, the states would
be able to determine how and when this would be done. In other words,
California could choose to use tiered-pricing, real-time pricing or set a
baseline rate above which prices would be passed through.
&We now have a piece of legislation that can fix the broken electricity
market and provide a period of reliability and stability in wholesale energy
costs,8 Senator Feinstein said.
&FERC has found the wholesale prices being charged in California to be unjust
and unreasonable. This legislation essentially will mandate that once FERC
makes such a finding, the agency will carry out its regulatory role. This is
a $175 million a year agency. It is there to regulate the energy marketplace,
and it should. What the Federal government can do is to provide a period of
reliability and stability at a time of crisis. Unfortunately FERC has refused
to do so.8
&California,s broken electricity market is a result of a flawed 1996
California law that deregulated wholesale costs, but left in place caps on
retail prices. This was coupled with a requirement that the utilities divest
themselves of their generating capacity and buy most of their electricity on
the spot market, where prices have escalated dramatically. In hindsight all
of this came together in a catastrophic scenario, so that today, California
buys electricity at astronomical prices. We believe that FERC needs to act to
help restore reasonable costs and stability to this marketplace.8
&Additionally, this agreement addresses the escalation of natural gas
transportation costs. Last February, FERC began a two-year experiment to lift
the cap on these costs and since that time we have seen the price of natural
gas climb 400 percent higher in Southern California.8 Senator Feinstein
added.
Specifically, the compromise legislation would accomplish the following goals:
Directs FERC to impose a just and reasonable wholesale rate cap, which can be
load-differentiated based on supply and demand, or cost-of-service-based
rates in the Western energy market (Western Systems Coordinating Council,
including Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico,
Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming.)
Addresses the issue of high natural gas transmission costs by reimposing FERC
tariffs for natural gas transportation into California (FERC Order 637) and
requiring natural gas sellers to declare separately the transportation and
commodity components of the bundled rate for gray market transactions.
Stipulates that the wholesale price cap or cost-of-service based rate will
not apply to wholesale sales for delivery in a state that imposes a price
limit on the sale of electric energy at retail that: precludes a regulated
utility from recovering costs under the price cap or on a cost-of service
based rate; or precludes a regulated utility from paying its bills.
Establishes that the rate-making body of a state can determine how and when
the wholesale rates will be passed on to ratepayers, including the setting of
tiered pricing, real time pricing, and baseline rates. (With respect to the
Bonneville Power Administration, BPA will be encouraged to seek to reduce
rate spikes to economically distressed communities, while ensuring costs are
recovered by the end of the next contract period in 2006.)
Directs that after the date of enactment, utilities cannot be ordered to sell
electricity or natural gas into a state without a determination by the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission that the seller will be paid.
Directs that in the event that a state in the Western energy market does not
meet the criteria described in this agreement, state public utilities
commissions in the Western energy market can ensure that regulated utilities
within their jurisdiction meet demand for electric energy in the utility,s
service area before making sales into any such state.
Establishes that the wholesale rate cap or cost-of-service based rates shall
remain in effect until such time as the market for electric energy in the
western energy market reflects just and reasonable rates, as determined by
the Commission or until March 1, 2003, whichever is earlier.


Shirley,

Please keep it on your radar screen.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 05/12/2000
05:15 PM ---------------------------

Sue Wadsworth@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
05/11/2000 05:16 PM
To: Mark Keeter/Contractor/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Vince J
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Bloomer/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Ravi Thuraisingham/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Arshak Sarkissian/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Scheduling a Meeting - Important - Please read

Scott Yeager has requested I set up a meeting for Mark Keeter to present to
the group his findings for the 6 month study of Managing Global
Network/Application Service Platform and include managing QoS end to end.

How does Tuesday May 23 in the morning look for everyone?
Mark, how long do you need I will schedule the conference room for.
Also please let me know if anyone else should be invited.

Sue Wadsworth
EB4590A
713-853-5105


Jeff,

Her name is Corey.

Vince

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Hotel for the Wharton trip

I'm not sure I'm going to make it to Phila because of PRC.  I will advise
next week.  Also, can you tell me Paula's last name that we rode with the
other day when you all took me to the airport?  Thanks.

Vince J Kaminski
11/20/2000 04:34 PM
To: Jennifer Burns/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT,
piazzet@wharton.upenn.edu
Subject: Hotel for the Wharton trip

Jennifer,

This is the address of the hotel within a walking distance to the Wharton
School.
Please, make the reservation for Jeff Shankman at this hotel for the December
the 6th meeting.

Vince Kaminski

http://www.innatpenn.com/contact.html
THE INN AT PENN
                                   Sansom Common, 3600 Sansom Street
                                   Philadelphia, PA. 19104
                                   Phone: 1-800-809-7001
                                   Fax: 215-222-4600

Please, mention that the stay is related to the University business
when making the reservation.
Tom Piazze at Wharton can confirm it.
Tom Piazze
Phone: (215) 898 1615
piazzet@wharton.upenn.edu


Michelle/Lizsette;

I was wondering if circumstances with Jonathan Lane (the contract Help desk person whom I mentioned to you a week or so ago) have been resolved?  When we last spoke I mentioned that he went to Valeria Hope's group.  I am not sure of the outcome  of that visit, but I will tell  you that his negative attitude and general dissatisfaction on the team is becoming disruptive to the other help desk members. He is away from his desk often (having "meetings", which may be interviews for other positions), he has shared with the other team members his perceptions of management and his issues with us.

If and when I can do so, I would like to terminate him.  I won't until I hear from you all, and we are documenting discussions as you requested.  I hope this can end soon, though because this is causing real problems here.

Gina


UNITED E-FARES (R)
SPECIAL DEALS FOR DOMESTIC DESTINATIONS

This is a post-only email. Please do not reply.

April 2, 2002

**********************************************************************

Dear Matthew Motley,

Welcome to this week's list of money-saving E-Fares for
travel this weekend and next weekend!

**********************************************************************

(1) Weekend E-Fare Cities
    Purchase by April 5, travel this Weekend

(2) Next Weekend E-Fares
    Purchase by April 5, travel Next Weekend

(3) Get away this spring
    Save an extra 5% off sale fares at united.com

(4) Special spring ski deals in Colorado and Utah

(5) Wish you were here? Win your dream vacation with united.com

(6) Introducing UnitedEscapes
    One special price for Air, Car & Hotel--Together

(7) Enjoy fantastic prices on the Norwegian Star in Hawaii

(8) Special offers and news for businesses

(9) United email subscriptions (subscribe / unsubscribe)

(10) E-Fare Facts (rules / information)

1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-

E-FARE OFFERINGS FOR TRAVEL THIS WEEKEND

These E-Fare weekend getaways are available for travel beginning
Saturday (April 6, 2002) and returning the following Monday
(April 8, 2002) or Tuesday (April 9, 2002).

Seats are limited and are only available for purchase through Friday,
April 5, 2002, so plan your travel now.

SAMPLE WEEKEND E-FARES

FROM:                        TO:                           ROUNDTRIP:

Cedar Rapids (CID)           Denver (DEN)                  $242.00 (2)
Chicago (ORD)                Louisville (SDF)              $88.00 (2)
Chicago (ORD)                Memphis (MEM)                 $158.00 (2)

Chicago (ORD)                White Plains (HPN)            $161.00
Denver (DEN)                 Lincoln (LNK)                 $177.00 (2)
Los Angeles (LAX)            Boston (BOS)                  $218.00

Los Angeles (LAX)            San Diego (SAN)               $95.00 (4)
Minneapolis/St. Paul (MSP)   Chicago (ORD)                 $110.00
New York City (JFK)          San Francisco (SFO)           $258.00

Philadelphia (PHL)           Chicago (ORD)                 $139.00
San Francisco (SFO)          New York City (JFK)           $258.00
San Francisco (SFO)          Orange County (SNA)           $106.00

San Jose (SJC)               Santa Barbara (SBA)           $148.00 (4)
Seattle (SEA)                San Francisco (SFO)           $125.00
Washington, D.C. (IAD)       Chicago (ORD)                 $139.00

(2) Portions of service may be operated by Air Wisconsin Airlines
(4) Portions of service may be operated by SkyWest Airlines(R)

We have so many E-Fares to offer this week we can only list a small
portion of them here. Check out
http://info.ual.com/cgi-bin2/flo?y=eGOk0DlLkB0B4u0BkjU0Am
for the complete list.

E-Fares are for U.S. point of sale only.

2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-

E-FARE OFFERINGS FOR TRAVEL NEXT WEEKEND

Next Weekend E-Fare getaways are available for travel beginning
Saturday (April 13, 2002) and returning the following Monday (April 15,
2002) or Tuesday (April 16, 2002).

Seats are limited and are only available for purchase through Friday,
April 5, 2002, so plan your travel now.

SAMPLE NEXT WEEKEND E-FARES

FROM:                        TO:                           ROUNDTRIP:

Anchorage (ANC)              Seattle (SEA)                 $245.00
Las Vegas (LAS)              Los Angeles (LAX)             $80.00
Los Angeles (LAX)            Las Vegas (LAS)               $80.00

Los Angeles (LAX)            Oakland (OAK)                 $90.00
Miami (MIA)                  Los Angeles (LAX)             $292.00
Miami (MIA)                  Washington, D.C. (IAD)        $135.00

Newark (EWR)                 San Francisco (SFO)           $318.00
Phoenix (PHX)                San Francisco (SFO)           $119.00
Reno (RNO)                   San Francisco (SFO)           $105.00

San Francisco (SFO)          Newark (EWR)                  $318.00
San Francisco (SFO)          Phoenix (PHX)                 $119.00
San Francisco (SFO)          Tucson (TUS)                  $102.00

Santa Barbara (SBA)          San Jose (SJC)                $148.00(4)
Seattle (SEA)                San Francisco (SFO)           $125.00
West Palm Beach (PBI)        Chicago (ORD)                 $164.00

(4) Portions of service may be operated by SkyWest Airlines(R)

We have so many E-Fares to offer this week we can only list a small
portion of them here. Check out
http://info.ual.com/cgi-bin2/flo?y=eGOk0DlLkB0B4u0BkjU0Am
for the complete list.

E-Fares are for U.S. point of sale only.

3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-

GET AWAY TO YOUR FAVORITE SPRING DESTINATION WITH UNITED.COM

Plan a spring getaway with united.com. Save up to an additional 5%
off sale fares and receive 1,000 Mileage Plus(R) bonus miles.

Travel must be purchased 7 or 14 days in advance and include a
three-night or Saturday night stay. Travel anytime through June 12,
2002, but be sure to purchase your tickets by April 10, 2002.

Sample ROUND-TRIP united.com fares:

FROM:                        TO:                           ROUNDTRIP:

Boston (BOS)                 San Francisco (SFO)           $378.00
Chicago (ORD)                Cincinnati (CVG)              $168.00
Chicago (ORD)                Houston (IAH)                 $252.00

Chicago (ORD)                Pittsburgh (PIT)              $142.00
Chicago (ORD)                Providence (PVD)              $204.00
Chicago (ORD)                San Jose, CA (SJC)            $254.00

Denver (DEN)                 Oakland (OAK)                 $378.00
Denver (DEN)                 Tampa (TPA)                   $378.00
Las Vegas (LAS)              Los Angeles (LAX)              $74.00

Los Angeles (LAX)            Phoenix (PHX)                  $98.00
Miami (MIA)                  San Francisco (SFO)           $378.00
Portland, OR (PDX)           Washington, D.C. (IAD/DCA)    $378.00

To check schedules and purchase these fares and other discounted
tickets online, go to
http://info.ual.com/cgi-bin2/flo?y=eGOk0DlLkB0B4u0BBSe0Ay
and login.

For complete sale rules and information go to
http://info.ual.com/cgi-bin2/flo?y=eGOk0DlLkB0B4u0BBSd0Ax
and click on Great Escapes.

For U.S. point of sale only.

4-4-4-4-4-4-4-4-4-4-4-4-4-4-4-4-4-4-4-4-4-4-4-4-4-4-4-4-4-4-4-4-4-4-4-

SPECIAL SPRING SKIING DEALS IN COLORADO AND UTAH

Spring is here! March and April are the biggest snow months in the
west. There's been a ton of snow this spring and more to come.
Temperatures are climbing, which means no more chattering teeth on
the lifts. Springtime skiing isn't just for the locals anymore.
Experience it for yourself and save.

Enjoy the lowest rates all season and additional discounts in
Breckenridge, Keystone and Aspen. Get your third night free in
Steamboat and a free lift ticket for all stays of 3 nights or more.

For pricing and availability or to see the latest snow reports visit:
http://info.ual.com/cgi-bin2/flo?y=eGOk0DlLkB0B4u0BleU0Ai

Call us today at 1-888-211-7759 for immediate assistance in planning
your next ski vacation

5-5-5-5-5-5-5-5-5-5-5-5-5-5-5-5-5-5-5-5-5-5-5-5-5-5-5-5-5-5-5-5-5-5-5-

WISH YOU WERE HERE? WIN YOUR DREAM VACATION WITH UNITED.COM

Book a flight at united.com as a registered user through May 7, 2002,
and you'll be automatically entered to win a flight to the destination
of your choice...plus so much more!

As the winner, you'll pack your new eBags luggage and board United to
wherever your heart desires. When you arrive, pick up your Hertz
rental car and check into a Hilton hotel for a glorious 7-day vacation.
And, don't forget to do a little shopping and dining with your
$250 Visa gift card.

Just bring your camera and swimsuit, and we'll take care of everything
else for a picture-perfect vacation.

For details visit
http://www.united.com/wishyouwerehere

6-6-6-6-6-6-6-6-6-6-6-6-6-6-6-6-6-6-6-6-6-6-6-6-6-6-6-6-6-6-6-6-6-6-6-

INTRODUCING UNITEDESCAPES PACKAGES

One special price for Air, Car & Hotel--Together. UnitedEscapes(sm)
packages let you combine your United flights, rental car and hotel
room in just a few clicks. Packages are available for next weekend or
well in advance. Plus, you'll earn 1,000 bonus miles with every
UnitedEscapes purchase.

Whether it's a romantic weekend or a longer getaway, design a
UnitedEscapes package that meets your needs and earns you 1,000 bonus
miles.

Visit
http://www.united.com/unitedescapes
for details.

7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-

ENJOY FANTASTIC PRICES ON THE NORWEGIAN STAR IN HAWAII

United Cruise4Miles has been able to obtain some unbelievable rates
on the brand new Norwegian Star sailing the Hawaiian Islands the
"Freestyle" way this spring. Redeem 250,000 of your United Mileage
Plus(R) miles for a party of 2 for a week in Paradise (including port
charges!).

Call and speak to one of our experienced cruise consultants at
1.888.666.8120 and ask for offer DEF32602.

Visit our Web site
http://info.ual.com/cgi-bin2/flo?y=eGOk0DlLkB0B4u0BB1v0Ah
and sign up to receive our weekly email of cruise specials.

Turn your miles into memories today!

8-8-8-8-8-8-8-8-8-8-8-8-8-8-8-8-8-8-8-8-8-8-8-8-8-8-8-8-8-8-8-8-8-8-8-

BUSINESS DECISION MAKERS:
SIGN UP FOR THE UNITED.COM BUSINESS TRAVEL NEWSLETTER

If you manage or coordinate travel for employees at your company, sign
up to receive the united.com Business Travel Newsletter. As a
subscriber, you'll receive special offers from United and select
partner organizations as well as news relevant to your company's
business travel.

Sign your company up today at
http://info.ual.com/cgi-bin2/flo?y=eGOk0DlLkB0B4u0BkqH0Ag

To view example partner offers, visit
http://info.ual.com/cgi-bin2/flo?y=eGOk0DlLkB0B4u0BBic0AK

9-9-9-9-9-9-9-9-9-9-9-9-9-9-9-9-9-9-9-9-9-9-9-9-9-9-9-9-9-9-9-9-9-9-9

OTHER UNITED EMAIL NOTIFICATIONS:

International (Non-U.S.) E-Fares:
Special discounted airfare offers and other travel-related offers for
destinations outside the U.S.

United Offers and Announcements:
Special service, product or promotional announcements.

Mileage Plus Communications:
Mileage Summary, Mileage Plus Program Updates, United and Mileage Plus
Partner Offers and Information, including My Mileage Plus.

Mileage Plus Partner Communications:
Valuable offers and information from Mileage Plus partners.

To SUBSCRIBE TO E-FARES AND OTHER UNITED NOTIFICATIONS

Go to
http://info.ual.com/cgi-bin2/flo?y=eGOk0DlLkB0B4u0BCVg0A5
Login with your Mileage Plus number and password. On the Update
Profile page select Email information. Check the option(s) that
correspond to the email(s) you would like to begin receiving.
Finally, click the Submit button at the bottom of the page. Requests
to subscribe to United notifications may take up to one week to
process.

To UNSUBSCRIBE FROM E-FARES

Go to
http://info.ual.com/cgi-bin2/flo?y=eGOk0DlLkB0B4u0BCVg0A5
Login with your Mileage Plus number and password. On the Update
Profile page select Email information. Uncheck the option(s) that
correspond to the email(s) you no longer wish to receive. Finally,
click the Submit button at the bottom of the page. Requests to
unsubscribe to United notifications may take up to one week to
process.

10-10-10-10-10-10-10-10-10-10-10-10-10-10-10-10-10-10-10-10-10-10-10-

DOMESTIC U.S. E-FARE FACTS: E-Fares are based on required round-trip
purchase for United Economy(R) travel on United Airlines and United
Express(R) carriers: Air Wisconsin Airlines Corporation, Atlantic
Coast Airlines and SkyWest(R) Airlines. E-Fares are valid only for
travel originating in the city or cities indicated, only on the dates
indicated and only in the direction indicated. E-Fares are NOT
eligible for upgrade to United First or United Business. E-Fares are
NOT eligible for the online booking bonus. Seats are limited and may
not be available on all flights/dates. Purchase Requirements:
Reservations must be made using United's Web site. Tickets require
immediate purchase by credit card when reservations are made. CREDIT
CARD OWNER MUST BE PRESENT AT AIRPORT CHECK-IN TO SHOW THE CREDIT CARD
USED TO PURCHASE THE TICKET AS WELL AS A VALID PICTURE ID. Ticketing
will be electronic, using E-Ticket services. Travel Days/Dates: Travel
is permitted outbound on Saturday with inbound travel the following
Monday or Tuesday. Min./Max. Stay: A Saturday night stay is required
for all fares. The maximum stay is 3 days. Additional Taxes/Fees:
Fares do not include a $3.00 per flight segment tax. A flight segment
is defined as one takeoff and one landing. Fares do not include
Passenger Facilities Charges of up to $18 which may be collected
depending upon itinerary. Fares do not include September 11th security
fees of up to $10, which may be collected depending on the itinerary.
In addition, fares do not include a $6.20 (each way) tax to/from
Alaska and Hawaii. Canada fares do not include U.S. departure,
agricultural, immigrations, customs taxes/surcharges and fees of up to
$39. Itinerary Changes: TICKETS ARE NON-REFUNDABLE. CHANGES ARE NOT
PERMITTED ON THE OUTBOUND SEGMENT OF THE ITINERARY. CHANGES WILL ONLY
BE PERMITTED ON THE RETURN FLIGHT PROVIDING THE NEW ITINERARY IS
WITHIN THE PARAMETERS OF THIS OFFER. A $100 SERVICE CHARGE FEE AND
ADDITIONAL FARE (IF APPLICABLE) WILL BE CHARGED. Stopovers, circle
trips, open jaws, one-way and open segments are not permitted with
E-Fares. Other Conditions: Fares are subject to change without notice.
These fares may not be combined with any other discounts, promotions
or coupons. Other restrictions may apply. Lower fares may be available
to select destinations.

Copyright 2002 United Air Lines, Inc.


Call me with questions at  713-851-2576.
 - Arena Lay points.doc


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 05/11/2001 07:14 PM -----

	David Parquet@ECT
	05/11/2001 01:24 PM

		 To: Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, hgovenar@govadv.com,
bhansen@lhom.com, sgovenar@govadv.com, Ksmith@kdscommunications.com,
rlichtenstein@marathon-com.com, syamane@marathon-com.com,
jkradin@marathon-com.com, Susan M Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie
Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Jennifer Thome/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey Keeler/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Schoen/NA/Enron@Enron, Samuel Wehn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelly Brodbeck/SF/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: California says clean air not power crisis cause

Kenny's comments are absolutely false or, at best,  grossly misleading.  We
need to respond to him.

The NUMBER ONE problem we have in California that is delaying our proposed
power plant developments is securing ERCs.  My discussions with Calpine
indicate that ERCs are their biggest problem as well.  (And in case someone
hasn't noticed, the two most active developers in CAlifornia are Enron and
Calpine.)  Air quality laws are definitely slowing us down, and slowing
others down, which keeps the new, cleaner plants from being developed.  As I
have mentioned before, this is actually making air quality worse in that the
older, dirtier plants are running more.  Further, if you do the math, we will
probably never make up for the dirty air that is created by keeping the dirty
plants in business because of grandfathering, while the clean plants don't
get done because of ever more rigorous BACT standards and lack of ERCs.

Having said that, I do not agree that we should send a message that we want
to relax or suspend the standards.  (However, getting 2ppm plants on line,
which will put out of business the 100+ppm plants - as Calpine indicated to
me happened in Texas - makes the point that maybe a relaxation or suspension
is the environmentally appropriate thing to do.)  All in all, though, I
believe that sucha common sense approach will go nowhere in California
because the little people in the regulatory positions as well as the public
will make sure that we pay for such a message.  Having said that, I will
repeat the key things that we should be promoting, in my opinion:  1.)  stop
the EPA from tightening the BACT standards to ever increasing levels of
insanity.  (GE will not guarantee the present, and new, EPA requirement of
2ppm, which EPA "determined" with no new operating data.  They just did it
because they could.)  2.)  Stop making up rules for RACT adjustments.  (Kelly
Brodbeck is working very hard, for example, to develop a program in the Bay
Area to retrofit boats with clean burning engines to create ERCs.  A high
level staff guy at BAAQMD "believes" that we should be RACT adjusted,
probably making the program uneconomic.  There isn't even unanimity for this
position on his staff.  However, this position if it sticks is irresponsible
in light of the fact that the boats can just keep on doing what they are
doing.  We are creating ERCs, which the BAAQMD will take a portion of in
their haircut, and in using the ERCs, we will eventually put out of business
the dirtier plants.  So, our program gets RACT adjusted and the air gets
dirtier...)  3.)  Allow for payment of mitigation fees in lieu of buying
ERCs.  There is precedent for that, but this has to be run through the SIP
and the EPA.  Again, the in-lieu fees can be used for gov sponsored ERC
developments (e.g., electric lawn mowers, electric water heaters, etc.),
which will clean the air.  I am aware that Sandy is working with the CA
legislature on this.  Go Sandy!

	Sandra McCubbin@ENRON
	05/11/2001 09:32 AM

		 To: Samuel Wehn/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: California says clean air not power crisis cause

so what is the problem? CARB says there isn't one!   Think we need to
schedule some educational meetings?
----- Forwarded by Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron on 05/11/2001 09:30 AM -----

	Mary Schoen
	05/04/2001 12:37 PM

		 To:
		 cc:
		 Subject: California says clean air not power crisis cause

Friday, May 4, 2001
?

California regulators told congressional lawmakers on Thursday that clean air
regulations are not to blame for the state's electricity shortages and said
new legislation seeking to ease air quality rules was unneeded.
Speaking at a House Commerce Energy and Air Quality Subcommittee hearing, the
head of the California Air Resources Board repeatedly said environmental
regulations should not be suspended for the sake of electricity.
"Air quality laws are not interfering with California's ability to bring new
generation on line and run existing power plants at maximum capacity," said
Michael Kenny, executive officer of the board.
When asked by Democratic lawmakers on the panel about a provision in a
pending electricity bill, the California regulator said the state did not ask
for a relaxation of clean air rules and did not need the change.
"We believe that air quality-related sections of the legislation are
unnecessary," Kenny said.
Rep. Joe Barton, the Texas Republican who chairs the energy subcommittee,
said the measures allow flexibility to states for the temporary suspension of
environmental laws. He said the key point of his bill is to ensure the lights
stay on in California this summer.
The Golden State expects to face threats of blackouts starting this month,
when air conditioning use accelerates.
Objections raised by Kenny to the Barton bill included disagreement on a
section allowing the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to waive, when
asked by a state, the requirements of the federal Clean Air Act pertaining to
nitrogen oxide emissions.
Kenny said the state already gives flexibility on the issue and contended the
legislation would go too far and be problematic.
"The waiver applies to all new generation facilities in the state and does
not allow for consideration on a case-by-case (generating plant by generating
plant) basis, where unique local factors can be weighed," said Kenny.


If you do not wish to receive email from Bargain Bazaar, please Click Here: UNSUBSCRIBE

  [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   Download Your FREE eBook!    Work  From Home! [IMAGE]  ?          Create Residual Income Security  with Unlimited Potential.  ?          Select both the Hours You Work &  the People You Work With.  ?          Improving your life while improving  the lives of others.  ?          Annual paid Getaway Vacations.  Click Here    The eBook  will only work on a PC Compatible with Microsoft Internet  Explorer 4 or up

[IMAGE]


Stacy:

	Please send me copies and I will see what I can figure out.

Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Richardson, Stacey
Sent:	Wednesday, December 05, 2001 11:05 AM
To:	Hodge, Jeffrey T.
Subject:	KeySpan agreements

Hi Jeff,

I was cleaning off the desk of one of my coworkers who was laid off and found two letters from KeySpan that she had not handled.  They were both from Charles Daverio, KeySpan Utility Services LLC as agent for The Brooklyn Union Gas Company.  One letter is a termination of a master agreement between ENA and The Brooklyn Union Gas Company, dated 12/01/88, with the termination effective 10/31/04.  The other is an alternative contract quantity election effective 11/01/01 for a master agreement dated 12/08/88.  I cannot locate either of these agreements in our system.  KeySpan Utility Services LLC, as agent or otherwise, is not set up in the Global Counterparty system at all.  None of our Brooklyn Union agreements even come close in date to the ones referenced in these letters.

In light of our current situation, I wanted to check with you to see if you knew anything about either agreement being referenced.  I certainly do not wish to call the counterparty and it probably does not even matter at this point.  I do plan to send these documents to the file room, but without a contract number to file them under, the file room will not know what to do with the documentation.

Please advise.

Thanks,
SBR x30569


I would like to see us try to re-insert words to the effect that if the
Commission throws out the CSA after haranguing the parties to reach an
agreement, it will seriously discourage future settlement efforts by parties.
That is not a deal-breaker for me, just a suggestion. Otherwise the comments
are fine.

-----Original Message-----
From: MBD [mailto:MDay@GMSSR.com]
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 10:43 AM
To: 'Pocta, Robert M.'; 'Counihan, Rick'; 'Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com';
'John Burkholder'; 'Mike Alexander'; 'Craig Chancellor'; 'Colin
Cushnie'; 'Jeff Dasovich'; MBD; 'Paul Amirault'; 'Doug Porter'; 'Tom
Beach'; 'Amirault, Paul'; 'Craig Chancellor, Calpine'; 'How-Downing,
Lindsey'; 'Phil Davies, WGSI Calgary'; 'jleslie@LUCE.com'; 'Jeff
Fawcett, Transwestern'; 'Michael Rochman'; 'Rick Counihan,
Greenmountain.com'; 'Bayless, David@Utility'; 'Dingwall, Brian@UEM';
'Elsesser, Evelyn@aelaw'; 'Johnson, Pamela@REMAC'; 'Jun,
Christine@aelaw'; 'Karp, Joseph@Whitecase'; 'McCrea, Keith@CIG/CM';
'Paul, Joe@Dynegy'; 'Pocta, Mark@ORA'; 'Scott, Susan@TW'; 'Worster,
Gerard@TXU'; 'kmills@CFBF.com'; 'Karp, Joseph@Whitecase'; 'Skaff,
Andy@Dynegy'
Subject: FW: Proposed revisions to CSA Letter

Here are some edits to our letter from socal.? I do not feel they diminsh
the usefulness of the letter, and they moderate the tone a little, as you
would expect.? They also eliminate the lengthy recitation of the procedural
events at the end of the letter.? If this gets them on the letter, I say
let's sign.? I will assume everyone who signed on last week stays on the
letter unless I hear differently from you by 3 pm today.? I really
appreciate the quick turnaround.? Mike Day
?
?
-----Original Message-----
From: Wright, Gillian - TP1GXW [mailto:GWright@sempra.com]
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 10:26 AM
To: 'mday@gmssr.com'
Subject: Proposed revisions to CSA Letter

Mike,
Here are SoCal's proposed revisions to the CSA letter - I'll call in a
minute.? The edits are pretty extensive, but all along the lines we
discussed (ie changing the tone to a more positive one).

Gillian

<<CSA Letter SCG.doc>>

Gillian A. Wright
Regulatory Case Manager
Sempra Energy
555 W. Fifth St. GT14D6
Los Angeles, CA 90013-1011
(213) 244-3833
(213) 244-8820 fax
gwright@sempra.com


Looks fine with me.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Berry, Lara
Sent:	Friday, July 20, 2001 4:58 PM
To:	Cash, Michelle
Subject:	Intern Evaluation - Please Advise

Michelle,

Dovie Keprta suggested I send this attachment to you for your approval.  I have revised an existing PRC Evaluation form.  I am going to use the attached form to evaluate the summer GTT interns.  Will you let me know if this is an appropriate tool for recording their performance and the supervisors hire/no hire opinion.

Thanks!

 << File: Intern Evaluation.doc >>

Lara


What you are suggesting after your discussion with Sara is what I am
suggesting.  The parent has the account; it holds the securities on behalf of
its Brazil sub.  I would very much like to remove SPE from the chain quickly
if possible so that if there is a CPMF assessed on the in-kind capital
reduction, we don't have to pay it twice.  I think that would also simplify
Robert's legal request.  Any objections?

Regards,  Bruce

Lynn Aven
01/18/2000 10:31 AM
To: Bruce Harris/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Robert H George/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Pedro Henrique
Oliveira/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kent
Castleman/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Bruce
Harris/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sara Shackleton@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Re: Millenium ADR(s)

The ADR's will be legally owned by PEP until we make a decision to move them
out and go through the process of having a capital reduction to move the
shares out of PEP.  Per discussions with Sara, we need to ascertain whether
MS will hold the ADR's in a security account in the name of the Enron  Brazil
Power Holding XII on behalf of PEP.

I just looked at the legal ownership of PEP and noted that there is another
Brazilian limitada, SPE between Enron Brazil Power Holdings XII and PEP.  I
assume that we will have filings for two capital reductions, one for PEP and
one for SPE unless SPE was removed from the ownership chain and that
transaction has not been reflected in the Corporate Secretary data base.  SPE
was placed in the chain of owenrship for the Comgas bid and I am not sure
whether it got removed when we recycled the entity.

Lynn

Bruce Harris
01/18/2000 05:05 AM
To: Robert H George/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Pedro Henrique Oliveira/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kent
Castleman/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Lynn
Aven/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Bruce
Harris/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Re: Millenium ADR(s)

If MS can do it thats great.  Is there any problem per MS with the parent
CayCo receiving the ADRs and holding them in its sub-account on behalf of
PEP?  Perhaps Sara could inquire.  These are physical certifciates (if issued
as restricted) so I don't know if the MS account is set up for physical
custody or whether we need to prepare some additional documentation.

Regards,  Bruce

	Enron International

	From:  Robert H George                           01/17/2000 04:43 PM

To: Bruce Harris/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Pedro Henrique
Oliveira/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kent
Castleman/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Lynn
Aven/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Millenium ADR(s)

BONY has asked us to send them a letter instructing them to issue the ADR(s)
and specifying where and to whom to deliver the certificates.  I will prepare
the instruction letter, but I am assuming that we want someone at Morgan
Stanley to take actual possession of the certificates.  In any event, I need
someone to tell me where the certificates should land and give me a physical
address for  the certificates.


---------------------- Forwarded by Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT on 09/06/2000
11:51 AM ---------------------------

Madhup Kumar@ENRON
09/06/2000 10:54 AM
To: Terry Furches
cc: Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT, George
Hopley/HOU/ECT@ect, Colin Tonks/LON/ECT@ECT, Scott Williamson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Ted Biggs/Corp/Enron@Enron, Yannis Tzamouranis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alex
Wong/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mark Symms/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Suixiong Pan/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Databeacon Pricing

Terry,
Please schedule a meeting with Internetivity on 9/12/00, 10;30 AM to 11:30
AM, and invite every one in above list. Thanks.
Madhup

---------------------- Forwarded by Madhup Kumar/Corp/Enron on 09/06/2000
10:48 AM ---------------------------

Madhup Kumar
09/06/2000 09:02 AM
To: "Mike Corbett" <mcorbett@internetivity.com>
cc:

Subject: Re: Databeacon Pricing

Hi Mike,
Thanks for sending pricing matrix. This will help the team evaluate. We look
forward to meeting you on 9/12/00 at 10:30 AM. Thanks.
Madhup

"Mike Corbett" <mcorbett@internetivity.com> on 09/05/2000 03:09:14 PM
To: "Madhup Kumar" <madhup.kumar@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Databeacon Pricing

Madhup,

Here is the pricing matrix attached as an Excel file.  Please contact me
with any questions.

I look forward to meeting with you next Tuesday.

Regards,

Mike Corbett
Account Executive
InterNetivity, Inc.
15580 Quorum Drive
Suite 2626
Addison, TX  75001
(214) 765-8100 (Main)
(214) 765-8101 (Fax)
(214) 769-8100 (Mobile)
E-Mail:  <mailto:mcorbett@internetivity.com>
Web Site:  http:\\www.internetivity.com

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This e-mail message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity
to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law

 - N. America Pricing Doc -01 April,2000.xls


Attached is a draft template for the Schedule and Paragraph 13 of a ISDA
Master Agreement to be use by hedge funds.  The document has been reviewed by
Cadwalader and contains a significantly enlarged range of representations and
covenants of both the hedge fund and the investment manager.  I have not
included in this draft the concept of an investment manager letter which was
suggested by Cadwalader and which can be used when the investment manager
does not agree to be a party to the ISDA Master Agreement.   I would
appreciate it if each of you would take a look at the document and provide me
with any comments you have.  I am meeting with David Mitchell of Cadwalader
on Monday of next week.  I also plan to walk through the base document with
Caroline Abramo and the others in New York on Sunday so that they can better
understand why the ISDA for hedge funds is more complex than normal ISDAs.
Finally, I am also attaching a list that I have prepared of the major changes
that have been made to the standard ISDA to create the hedge fund template.
Thanks.

Frank


They are ready to sign,  I will send execution docs today.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


I just got your documents.  Call me.


----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 08/30/2000 06:54 PM -----

	Brent Vasconcellos@ENRON
	08/30/2000 01:52 PM

		 To: Scott Sefton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Trushar Patel/Corp/Enron@Enron, Gordon
McKillop/NA/Enron@ENRON, James Harris/HOU/EES@EES
		 cc: AnnMarie Tiller/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bill Bowes/NA/Enron@Enron, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Raptor III

Attached for your review and comment is our Raptor III structure chart.

JBV


Mark Taylor
Vice President and General Counsel
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street - EB3892
Houston, Texas 77008
(713)853-7459
(713)646-3490 (fax)


Maybe I'm not looking at this appropriately, but why didn't the deferred taxes on the balance sheet disappear as of the date of sale to Dynegy?  My understanding is that the Option provided for a Section 338h10 basis step-up.  That would result in NNG's paying off its deferred taxes as of the transfer date.  I'm particularly interested in knowing how NNG will pay those taxes given that the note with Corporate can only be reduced to $240MM plus accrued dividends.  That tax election complicates the accounting significantly.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Howard, Kevin A.
Sent:	Tuesday, February 12, 2002 10:35 AM
To:	Hayslett, Rod; Geaccone, Tracy; Chandler, Bob; Saunders, James; Corman, Shelley
Cc:	Desai, Jayshree
Subject:	NNG 10 year valuation model

I met with Jayshree Desai this morning to discuss the recommended changes to the NNG valuation model.  She will make these and circulate the model later today.  I few items worth mentioning -

1) Capex assumptions still seem too high for 2002-2004.  However, the 2002 number is some $30 million below the "Dynegy transition" capex amount shown in the 2002 Capex schedule.  Can we just assume non-discretionary only with the Base Gas repurchase in 2002/2003? Any discretionary would be commercially-driven.
2) Keep O&M flat to 2001 numbers?
3) Tracy / Shelley - Any thoughts on how to incorporate the contract info to better analyze the "contract roll off" scenarios? We have just assumed the 2002 Plan with 1-2% growth rate going forward with a new rate case in effect in 2005. Rod, not sure how you want to look at rate case assumptions or expansion opportunities but we can discuss tomorrow.  Recognizing the volume of NNG contract info and the time constraint we are under, there may or may not be any better alternative.
4) Rod - we have assumed an equity infusion of $175 million to re-capitalized NNG to more "reasonable" levels.  I can reduce the amount to $112,500,000 which is the Citibank prepay amount allocated to NNG if that sounds reasonable.
5) We will show a reduction in A/R of $1.807 billion and a corresponding reduction in equity due to the MCTJ loan.

Any thoughts you have on the above items would be very helpful.  We are trying to send out the info memo by the end of the week.  This model will be the basis for the NNG valuation.

Thanks,
Kevin


Richard--Joe has some ideas about this and will get back with you (and submit
the RCR).

"Tabors, Richard" <tabors@tca-us.com> on 07/18/2000 06:05:36 PM
To: Christi L Nicolay <Christi.L.Nicolay@enron.com>, James D Steffes
<James.D.Steffes@enron.com>
cc: "Tabors, Richard" <tabors@tca-us.com>, Joe Hartsoe
<Joe.Hartsoe@enron.com>, Richard Shapiro <Richard.Shapiro@enron.com>, Steven
J Kean <Steven.J.Kean@enron.com>, Rob Bradley <Rob.Bradley@enron.com>
Subject: RE: Dan Larcamp request

Christi, Jim, et al

This last exchange has been very helpful.  The question that we need some
guidance on is how detailed he wants these answers and what he will do with
the results.  There are at least two levels that we could look at
effectively.

 1.  Fairly quickly, a repeat of the analysis done in the summer of
'98 when we looked at the price spikes in the midwest.  It would need to
focus on San Diego since that seems to be where the price problem is today
(along with the midwest) and also get a glimmer on (rumor picked up here)
the impact of CA price spikes on Oregon consumers.  The conclusion from '98
was that price spikes are necessary to send investment price signals for
both generation additions and for DSM investments (load response).
Presumably this would carry forward to a 2000 study.

 2.  A more careful look at the same areas described above but more
focused on how the wholesale prices find their way to end use consumers.  WE
covered this only in a cursory fashion in '98.  Here we would need to do two
things.  The first is make certain that Dan and the FERC senior folks
understand the basics that the price spikes in the midwest and in the other
bilateral markets only affect the incremental transactions (the lesson of
'98)not all kWh.  This is different from price spikes in the "pool markets"
where they set the price for all kWh.  The second point is to see that there
is an understanding of the role of a forward market and a hedge, i.e. that
you could "look on EOL" and buy forward a 7x24 for the summer, say, and pay
a market price to protect you against the volatility on an hourly basis by
absorbing it in a 3 month contract. The "price signal for investment"
conclusion would carry forward as above.

What do you think the level of interest / need is and how quickly does he
need some or all of the answers?

This is a good time for TCA to tackle this.  We have (or had) a quiet moment
for both Fagan and Rao who are the two experts on data development and
analysis from published sources.

Christi, let's talk in the morning so I can scope an RCR.

Thank you.

Richard

-----Original Message-----
From: Christi L Nicolay [mailto:Christi.L.Nicolay@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2000 5:17 PM
To: James D Steffes
Cc: tabors@tca-us.com; Joe Hartsoe; Richard Shapiro; Steven J Kean; Rob
Bradley
Subject: Re: Dan Larcamp request

Thanks, Jim--Dan Larcamp seemed to genuinely want to learn what the problems
are
and to educate his staff.  In that regard, we have offered to have some of
his
staff down to use some of Enron's tools.  He was specifically asking for the
data below to counter the bent at FERC for price caps.  I didn't get a
feeling
that he would use the data to say that everything is fine.  In fact, we took
him
through some parking examples and he asked that we hold a "seminar" type
activity for some of his senior staffers.  He is in the process of bringing
on
some staffers that can act agressively on hotline issues, etc.  He was very
familiar with the other problems on the grid.

He also asked Kevin why Enron doesn't want LMP everywhere because with our
staffing we can run over everyone else.  Kevin told him that then there is
no
market liquidity and we can't trade with ourselves.  As it is now, there are
less than 10 big players due to the transmission risk.  We explained in
detail
what happens in the "Into" Markets and why it is so difficult to deal with
transmission/physical risk.  Kevin said that even the big bank players, like
Morgan Stanley, usually flip the product before it goes to liquidation so
they
do not have to take transmission risk.  Dan L., having come from gas,
understood
the liquidity issues and had a good discussion with Kevin.  (He sat down in
Kevin's chair and looked at pricing on EOL.)

Overall, it was a very positive meeting.  Kevin was impressed that Dan L.
really
understood the issues and acted like he wanted to do something, but needed
help
in educating his people.

James D Steffes@EES
07/18/2000 04:00 PM

To:   Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:   tabors@tca-us.com@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron@ECT, Richard
      Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Rob
      Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject:  Re: Dan Larcamp request  (Document link: Christi L Nicolay)

Christi, etal --

I don't disagree with this analysis, but the drive for competitive
generation is
not simply related to the short term benefits (one year total energy bill
versus
next year total energy bill).  Competitive generation is also about risk
transfer - regulated monopolies assign all new plant risk to customers,
merchant
generation assigns all new plant risk to shareholders.

In addition, I hope that Larcamp won't take our data / analysis and try to
argue
that "everything is fine".  Clearly there are many undone / misdone public
policy problems (e.g., native load exception, hourly transmission, etc.)
left in
the wholesale energy markets.

Jim

To:   tabors@tca-us.com
cc:   Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Richard
      Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES
Subject:  Dan Larcamp request

Richard T. -- Dan Larcamp of FERC was here today and asked for a
comprehensive,
real price study using data from last summer or the last two summers showing
how
much on a $kw basis that retail customers were affected by the price spikes
(including how much they saved as a result of hopefully lower prices for the
remainder of the year.)  He needs this to fight price caps.  How much would
something like that cost (probably using some of the data you gathered last
year.)?  How long would it take to create?  Thanks for your help.


Attached is the Confidentiality Agreement you requested.


Greg,

Attached for your further handling is the Rio Nogales Interconnect
Agreement.  All of RNP's proposed changes have been included verbatim except
the proposed Rider 15 which has been modified as follows:

Upon such assignment from RNP to PNG Utility Company, RNP shall be released
from any further obligations, duties and liabilities under this Agreement
(except for the reimbursement of HPL for the design, installation,
procurement and construction of the HPL Facilities required by Section 3
hereof up to a maximum of $300,000.00), provided RNP provides HPL with prior
written notice of such assignment to PNG Utility Company, and PNG Utility
Company assumes all of RNP's obligations, duties and liabilities under this
Agreement.  However, RNP shall not be released hereunder, from any
obligations, duties and liabilities of RNP existing prior to the date of such
assignment to PNG Utility Company.

If you have any questions or comments, give me a call.  Thanks

Eric Gillaspie
713-345-7667
Enron Building 3886


Attended the interim team review process and meeting in Houston.

Met with the New Mexico Regional Director of the Rocky Mountain Elk
Foundation.  Picked up materials to be presented at the Southwest cross
functional training meeting in Albuq. next week.

Delivered and presented the Work Plan for the Station 9 soil rememdiation to
the Oil conservation Division and Hazardous Waste Bureau of New Mexico.


Mark:

Can you "publish" a list of swap attorneys and their primary/secondary areas
of responsibility (for at least the lawyers to use)?  I'd like to direct
random requests to the appropriate people.

For example, is Brent the only "weather attorney"?

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Joseph Hrgovcic/HOU/ECT on 06/01/2000
12:53 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Lucy Ortiz                           06/01/2000 08:58 AM

To: Mark Tawney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven Vu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brando
Hayden/HOU/ECT@ect, David Kistler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul
R Henry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph Hrgovcic/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rajib Saha/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Michael Nguyen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tony Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Seth
Hurwitz/Corp/Enron@Enron, Timothy M Norton/HOU/ECT@ECT,  Nick mooney, Ingrid
Wees, Catherine Woolgar/LON/ECT@ECT,  Victoria Bedingfield, Raymond
Yeow/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Christian
Werner/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: Weather Derivatives: Under cover

---------------------- Forwarded by Lucy Ortiz/HOU/ECT on 06/01/2000 08:56 AM
---------------------------

djcustomclips@djinteractive.com on 06/01/2000 09:21:18 AM
Please respond to nobody@mail1.djnr.com
To: 126812@mailman.enron.com
cc:
Subject: Weather Derivatives: Under cover

Business
Under cover
Martin Waller

05/31/2000
The Times of London
2W
31
(Copyright Times Newspapers Ltd, 2000)

   CORNEY & BARROW, the mainly City wine bar chain, is going into the
derivatives market. The chain is thought to be the first in the
hospitality industry to take a position against our atrocious
weather.

   Sarah Heward, the managing director, got the idea after meeting a
bunch of customers who had just left Garban to set up their own
business, Speedwell Weather Derivatives. About half her wine bars
have outside terraces which have understandably not proven too
popular of late.
   "They set me up with a hedge - my counterparty is Enron US," says
Heward. This safeguards a modest Pounds 15,000 of turnover.

Folder Name: Weather Derivatives
Relevance Score on Scale of 100: 94

______________________________________________________________________

To review or revise your folder, visit http://www.djinteractive.com or
contact Dow Jones Customer Service by e-mail at custom.news@bis.dowjones.com
or by phone at 800-369-7466. (Outside the U.S. and Canada, call 609-452-1511
or contact your local sales representative.)
______________________________________________________________________

Copyright (c) 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved


Sara:

Thanks for passing along the below address to me.  The tour guide was very
nice, but a bit inexperienced and certainly not with a luxury car.  It was
good for a do it yourself tour if you already have an idea of what you want
to see.  It actually confirmed for me that, unless you really stay to become
involved with the people, Sao Paulo is a fairly shallow city historically and
socially.  I hear, however, that there are many interesting colonial cities
in Minas Gerais, and Rio is only a 45 minute flight away.

Hope all is well.

Mike

Ms. Sonia
"GO IN"
Office:  289-3814
Cell:    9211 5399

City Tour:  approx. 3 hrs.

1p.  R$ 75
2p  R$ 110


Dear All,

Please find attached our Weekly Report (16th November 2000) for your
information and perusal.

Regards,

Beverley


it is okay if i am getting old b/c i age really well.  anyway, men get
distinguished as they age.  i don't care how old i get just as long as i keep
my hair.  i can't believe you don't like freds when it is packed.  that is
the best time to be at that place.  i do feel better at work today.  i found
out i get to go to monterey, cali in two weeks for a boondoggle.  it is all
paid for and all i will do is booze and golf.  i look foward shit like that
now.    you should be going out every night while you can.  one day you will
hit the real world and you can't do that.  lsu is not the real world.  you
can still party a lot while you work, you just have to be in pain at work and
pretend like you are not hung over so they don't think you have a problem.  i
usually go out 2-3 nights a week.  i try to live like a rock star (like
britney spears).  email me back when you get a chance.


I spoke to Greg Adams on the EOG commodity affiliate positions.  He has never
supplied VaR on these.  We have no information on these.  You need to ask
whoever supplies you the quarterly numbers to supply you with the non-quarter
end months.

Jill

	Enron Global Finance

	From:  Jill Erwin                           01/25/2000 05:23 PM

To: Georgeanne Hodges/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Steve Ross/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Nogid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eugenio
Perez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tony Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jan Johnson/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON,
Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck@ECT, Jennifer
Stevenson/AA/Corp/Enron@Enron, Derek Claybrook/AA/Corp/Enron@Enron, Faith
Killen/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Annual Report VAR Disclosures - open items

See colored notes below.

	From:  Georgeanne Hodges                           01/25/2000 03:25 PM

To: Jill Erwin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Ross/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Nogid/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Eugenio Perez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tony Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jan Johnson/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck@ECT,
Jennifer Stevenson/AA/Corp/Enron@Enron, Derek Claybrook/AA/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Faith Killen/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Annual Report VAR Disclosures - open items

This is Part II of the open items on VAR, addressing ECM, PGE & affiliate
books

From my review of Eugenio's consolidated VAR spreadsheet, the following
listed items are those that are open that we           need information from
you on.   Corp. is looking to type the first draft of the Annual Report (to
be discussed with the Audit Committee) THIS FRIDAY, so we need your help with
this information as soon as possible.  If you will not be able to have all of
the information to Eugenio by Thursday night, please let me know.  We may be
able to give you some additional time to gather some of the smaller pieces.
If you need to forward this on to others, please do so.

AA if you know of any other issues of completeness that I have not addressed,
please let Eugenio and I know!

*Have AA and Jan Johnson concluded that we only need to include the puts on
the Enron stock?  If so we need all twelve months of comparable data as
applicable.    Steve Ross sent to Eugenio on Monday (yesterday).  Let him
know if he needs to re-send it.

*Are the swaps shown on the ECM FN3 schedule for the phantom stock plan the
puts that we have been talking about?  If not do these swaps need to be
included in VAR and the non-trading portion of FN3?  I haven't seen them
before.   These are new puts.  I checked with Jan.  She said to include the
positions as non-trading equity.  The trades were both done in November by
Gary Hickerson's group.  Be sure he hasn't included them in his numbers.
We'll get the VaR for November and December to you on Wednesday.  (Steve,
this is yours).

*What is Yosemite?  Is it a TRS that I need to include in VAR and FN3?
Internally we call it a swap but in the legal document it is called an
Agreement.  It's actually more of a guarantee.  I talked to Jan about it and
we don't think it goes in FN3.

*For non-trading I\R and F\X, we are still missing all non-quarter end
months.    Jeff, this ones yours.  We need to send the information to
Research and have them run the VaR monthly in 2000 also.

*PGE - January,February and March VAR is missing on Eugenio's schedule.  I
don't have a clue what PGE's information is.  I only know about Rhythms which
is in a separate section.  You'll have to ask PGE.

*What month was the EOG sale effective?  We need commodity affiliate for all
of the non-quarter end months prior to the sale.  The sale took place August
16.  I have never even heard of any EOG commodity affiliate position.  I was
told Greg Adams handled these at one point.  I'll ask him tomorrow.


Supposedly but I am trying to get out of it.  I will let you know.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayslett, Rod
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 6:40 AM
To:	Horton, Stanley
Subject:	FW: Board of Directors Meeting - December 11, 2001
Importance:	High

Are you still going to be making a presentation?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Johnson, Kelly   On Behalf Of Rieker, Paula
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 3:59 PM
To:	Beck, Sally; Blachman, Jeremy; Bowen Jr., Raymond; Brown, Michael - COO London; Buchanan, Harold; Buy, Rick; Causey, Richard; Cheek, Charles; Cline, Wade; Cox, David; Derrick Jr., James; Dietrich, Janet; Donahue, Jeff; Elliott, Steve; Fallon, Jim; Frevert, Mark; Glisan, Ben; Hannon, Kevin; Hayslett, Rod; Horton, Stanley; Hughes, James A.; Kean, Steven J.; Kimberly, Kelly; Kitchen, Louise; Koenig, Mark; Lavorato, John; Lay, Kenneth; Leff, Dan; McCarty, Danny; Mcconnell, Mike; McMahon, Jeffrey; Metts, Mark; Muller, Mark S.; Olson, Cindy; Pickering, Mark; Piper, Greg; Scrimshaw, Matthew; Shankman, Jeffrey A.; Sherrick, Jeffrey; Sherriff, John; Whalley, Greg
Cc:	Adams, Jennifer; Aden, Beverly; Armstrong, Julie; Blackwood, Connie; Bolen, Vivianna; Bourgeois-Galloway, Hilda; Burns, Jennifer; Butler, Alan; Campos, Kathy; Chapman, Kay; Davidson, Binky; Daw, Nicki; Dick, Sharon; Dodgen, Kathy; Dorsey, Joyce; Ferrari, Kerry; Fisher, Dolores; Fleming, Rosalee; Ford, Sue; Gadade, Mrudula; Harris, Stephanie J ; Hawkins, Linda; Hillis, Kimberly; Hinojosa, Esmeralda; Iannarone, Lauren; Joyce, Mary; Lawless, Michelle; Marshall, Lucy; Mcginnis, Stephanie; McMahon, Kathy; McVicker, Maureen; Paxton, Jana L.; Phillips, Cathy; Rapacioli, Marisa; Rijo, Leah; Schiller, Marsha; Schoppe, Tammie; Slade, Nikki; Spiller, Tina; Stark, Cindy; Sullo, Sharon E; Taylor, Liz; Urquhart, Lauren; Valdez, Christina; Valdez, Veronica; Valencia, Laura; Walker, Stacy; West, Terry; Westbrook, Sharron; Wright, Teresa
Subject:	Board of Directors Meeting - December 11, 2001
Importance:	High

 << File: AgndaReq.doc >>

Kelly M. Johnson
Executive Assistant
Enron Corp.
Tel: 713-853-6485
Fax: 713-853-2534
E-Mail: kelly.johnson@enron.com


Further to our conversation, please see the attached ENA GISB with Special Provisions on the last page.  Please give me a call upon your review to discuss.

Best regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Legal
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron
713-853-7658
713-646-3490 Fax