Sarah: I worked off of Dave's markup with which I concur, and included a few minor revisions. We don't talk about Governance issues. Is that not part of this docket? Also, in the reliability section, you may want to mention in  a footnote that the NYS Reliability Council is an example of a model we definitely do NOT want FERC to follow. As you know, that organization, which is separate from the NYISO, is made up of a select and specified group of market participants, and is dominated by the utilities.

Have a great holiday. Howard

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Perrino, Dave
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 3:34 PM
To:	Novosel, Sarah; Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.; Robertson, Linda; Nord, Sue; Landwehr, Susan M.; Walton, Steve; Comnes, Alan; Lindberg, Susan; Maurer, Luiz; Fromer, Howard; Hoatson, Tom; Allegretti, Daniel; Staines, Dan; Yeung, Charles; Shelk, John; Rodriquez, Andy
Cc:	Nicolay, Christi L.
Subject:	RE: RTO Comments
Importance:	High

Sarah,

I have added a couple comments on the paper.

I think it would be useful to use the specific information I have added about NY and their handling of the NYPA hydro projects in section II A.  I have added some cites from RT01-12 that hopefully provide what you are looking for as far a Commission statements about the number of RTOs.  There are some other miscellanous comments as well.

In the conclusion, I know our position has always been against penalties as it relates to things like ancillary services, but philosophically speaking I thought it may be beneficial to include some language which would allow the Commission some explict actions it could take if RTO compliance (started on time) was not met.  Otherwise I can just see them (the commission) drawing lines in the sand over and over again, like Dec 15, 2001 and the utilities just continuing being passive agressive.  Just a thought.

Kind Regards,

Dave

 << File: Comments on RTO Week -- Revised dfp.doc >>

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Novosel, Sarah
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 10:50 AM
To:	Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.; Robertson, Linda; Nord, Sue; Landwehr, Susan M.; Walton, Steve; Perrino, Dave; Comnes, Alan; Lindberg, Susan; Maurer, Luiz; Fromer, Howard; Hoatson, Tom; Allegretti, Daniel; Staines, Dan; Yeung, Charles; Shelk, John; Rodriquez, Andy
Cc:	Nicolay, Christi L.
Subject:	RTO Comments

Attached are draft RTO comments.  The comments reflect EPMI's views on RTO development, given the Commission's apparent recent changes in position on the number of RTOs to be created.  We urge Right Sized RTOs without choosing a number.

The comments reflect input from Christi, Dave Perrino, Steve Walton, Mike Roan, Andy and Charles.  Please review the sections where you have had input to make sure we adequately reflected your points, but please also review the entire document and let us know your thoughts.

I'm still filling in cites and Bernadette will be working on the formatting, but the document is hopefully in pretty good shape.  There is no filing deadline for these comments, but we would like to submit them on Monday if possible.  It shouldn't take more than an hour to review.  In sending your comments, please "Reply to All" so everyone receives your comments.

Thanks for everyone's help.

Susan:  we should also have Kevin review the comments

Alan:  Tim should probably review the comments as well, but check with Dave and Steve to see if the "LMP in the West" argument is correct before you show him the comments.

Sarah

 << File: Comments on RTO Week -- Revised.doc >>


i have a cell phone now.  # is 713-825-8410


Attached are our power point slides laying out the time line for FERC
action.  The estimated time frames for FERC action, even without a
settlement, are somewhat more positive than we discussed yesterday (e.g.,
FERC order on the merits after a technical conference by mid-February).
Also, the group is somewhat optimistic that the FERC order in November could
be an order on the merits, without additional proceedings such as a technical
conference or a hearing.  These optimistic time tables are based on the
assumption that Sierra will not take any action that will alienate or annoy
FERC, which could result in a slowdown in FERC's approval process.

Adam Wenner, Steve Angle, Sam Behrends, Joanne Rutkowski and I all discussed
the various time frames that are laid out in the slides, but they have not
seen the slides, so we would like to reserve the right to amend the slides
once everyone has a chance to review them.  Also, as we discussed yesterday,
we would like to be able to revise the slides, if necessary, tomorrow once we
get FERC's agenda for its November 8 meeting and we see what action FERC
takes in the California investigation on price spikes this past summer.

Please let me know if you have any questions or comments.

Sarah


I have not yet found an effective way to come to peace with the anger and resentment I still feel with our situation. This along with being easily influenced by others has not allowed me to go through a proper healing process for the deepness of the hurt I feel.
It is not fair nor acceptable for me to not take 100% ressponsibility for the breakdown in communication with you last nite and the continuous fuel I add to the conflict.
I am resolving to get better counsel and find better ways of coping with my feelings so that I can end the cycle of anger between us and be more accepting, appreciative and non resentful for who you are and stop trying to change you or push opinions on you. I have to find peace somehow and will no longer do things that continue to make you feel threatened, alone, unsafe and unloved. Whatever the outcome, I can't live with myself until I manage to do these things.
Kay

Dutch Quigley@ECT
04/25/2001 08:26 AM

To:	Kay Quigley/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject:

I feel after last night that we are unable to rationally communicate with each other at this point in our lives.
I still want to get to a point where we can, I love you and I want to try and make this work.  If it is already to late
the we need to work through that also.

I am working on myself to get to a better place as are you, I feel as though you have formulated your own reasons
 of why I act the way I do. I have been struggling with myself to find them and it is harder for me when you
do not listen to me. From the note you left me last night I was looking forward to talking to you and I was not ready
last night and It did not go well. I am also in  a very lonely place right now in my life and just want to be happy and carefree
again.  It will take time and that is whwere I am at right now.

I did not call you back last night b/c I did not want to fight anymore then we had already.

I love you Kay

Dutch


Thanks Daren, I just found the answer this afternoon.  We paid Seagull.
Ocean Energy bought Seagull, and Pam Boxx included this deal with her net to
Seagull.  We just need to move the suspense amount.   Thanks.

Daren J Farmer
10/03/2000 05:04 PM
To: Cynthia Hakemack/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: HPLC/Ocean Energy Inc. 09/99 Purchase

I have no idea why payment would be suspended.  I don't remember having any
problems with Ocean Energy.  Sorry.

D

Cynthia Hakemack
10/02/2000 05:19 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: HPLC/Ocean Energy Inc. 09/99 Purchase

Daren, There are five HPLC purchase deals for 09/99 from Ocean Energy Inc.
They were Craig Falbaum's deals.  A person who is no longer in my group
suspended payment for these deals.  Gary suggested that I contact you and see
if you have any insight as to why the deals might have been suspended, or
know anything that might help.  Thanks.


Tim will be speaking from 12 - 1 today in Mt Hood.

All other sessions will be 11 - 12

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dunton, Heather
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 1:27 PM
To:	DL-Portland World Trade Center
Subject:	Classes 11-12 Mt Hood

Please join Enron Training Sessions 11-12  MT Hood.
The goal is to provide an overview of each major function in our office to anyone who is interested in learning about what goes on here.

Schedule:

1/4 Tim Belden - Floor Overview

1/7 Matt Motley  - Term Trading
1/8 Sean, Diana, Richter - Cash Trading / California Market
1/9 Stewart, Paul, Foster - Middle Market / Services
1/10 Tim H - Fundies
1/11 Alan - Regulatory

1/14 Donald - Scheduling
1/15 Bill - Real Time
1/16 Scotty - Volume Management
1/17 John - Risk Management
1/18 Susan, Steve, Christian - Credit & Legal

1/22 Todd - Structuring


Kay / Christi:

We need to get a law firm reviewing this agreement as soon as possible. As
Christi has worked with several on past projects, I thought she could help.
Please let me know how we should proceed.

Thanks,

Ben
---------------------- Forwarded by Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT on 05/21/2001 02:57 PM
---------------------------

Greg Krause@ENRON
05/21/2001 04:00 PM
To: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Midway Project - Generic Interconnect Agreement

Please see attached for your review and comments.


Dear Britt

Attached below is a summary of the test results.

Sorry I didn't revert with the summary sooner, but I needed the time to
double check. I would still like to have Eric run through it just in case. I
will update the team if there are amendments. Please disregard the rough
summary for Thailand in my earlier e-mail. I had missed out one test (18
July) and mistakenly said that Lead was off spec for the 14 July test.

I met with Neale Gregson today who has in turn spoken with David Best on what
test method for metals we ought to propose for the joint testing. I
understand David will be conferring with Steve Jones and advising.

Regards
Matt

From: Britt Davis@ENRON on 08/08/2000 10:30 PM
To: Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT
cc: Janice R Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M
Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael A
Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Deborah Shahmoradi/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: D3605/In re M/V PACIFIC VIRGO

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL:  ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION, ATTORNEY WORK
PRODUCT

Matt,

Thanks for the heads-up on this issue.  I will confer with Janice and one of
us will get back to you.

Meanwhile, I think I may need further clarification about  what testing
methods were used by SGS at loadport and at discharge in Thailand and the
Phillipines.  My key area of concern is whether (as now appears unlikely from
your e-mail) SGS tested using both ASTM D3605 without ashing and ASTM D3605
with ashing at all the relevant points, and whether the test results were
consistent; e.g., whether the product was on-spec for both methods
immediately before loading, but off-spec for both methods at discharge in
Thailand and the Phillipines.  May I impose on you to provide one summary
chronology of the analysis done at loadport and both discharge ports, with
particular emphasis on (a) whether both testing methods (ASTM D3605 without
ashing and with ashing) were used, and the results, and (b) the results for
filterable dirt? (You have just sent something like this for the Thailand
cargo only, which I found very helpful).   Also, if SGS or anyone else has
made comment about the reliability or unreliability of the filterable dirt
analysis (or any other aspect of the testing done by SGS of this cargo),
please let me know about that as well.

I appreciate your good help.

    Britt

	Matthias Lee@ECT
	08/08/2000 06:39 AM

		 To: Janice R Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Britt Davis/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angeline
Poon/SIN/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: D3605

Dear Janice / Britt

I know that Janice has kindly agreed to return to the team to advise and
coordinate with Mike Brown's team and myself in regard to the D3605 issue,
whilst I am to look to Britt's guidance for the contamination on the Elang
cargo. My apologies therefore for mixing the issues for the puposes of this
e-mail.

The joint testing of samples of the Elang cargo is planned to take place end
next week. The joint testing would include metals as well as filterable dirt,
so we would need to decide, in quite short order, on the test method we want
to propose for metals for relevant parties to agree.

Although we believe the contamination would be dramatically demonstrated by
the level of filterable dirt, the metals clearly would also be an important
factor. As you may be aware, the loadport sample results which we are
presently relying on to say that the cargo was on spec when loaded, was
tested with "ashing" for metals. We would not be able to say whether another
loadport sample would test on spec for metals using straight D3605. If it
doesn't test on spec at the joint testing using straight D3605, the vessel
owners would surely argue that the cargo would have been rejected by First
Gas anyway, independent of the filterable dirt. Although such as argument may
not defeat our case entirely, it is very likely to impact on the quantum we
would be able to recover.

It seems that the preferred test method for metals at the joint testing would
therefore be "ashing" to avoid conflict with existing loadport sample
results. We still have SGS's support for that, but we need to convince Minton
Treharne who acts for the cargo underwriters as well as the Owners/P&I Club.
Still, just in case details of our dispute with Mitsubishi become known to
Firts Gas, we may wish to avoid proposing a test method for joint testing
that would be inconsistent with the one we ultimately present to First Gas,
which for obvious long term objectives ought to be the CORRECT test method
acceptable to parties whether D3605 or "ashing" or some other method. That
said, I think if we are able to go with "ashing" for the joint testing, it is
not likely to jeopardize our position with First Gas.

I note Janice's preference for US experts over European experts for the D3605
issue. Have we been able to get any US experts' view on the right test to use
(whether D3605 or "ashing")? Has Enron formed a view on the "correct" test
method? If we have been able to source a "friendly" US expert, we may want to
have his input for the contamination issue.

Your views and guidance would be most appreciated.

Thanks and regards
Matt

I also note Janice's preference to source for US experts to assist us on the
D3605 issue over European experts and was wondering whether we have been able
to for


[IMAGE]		[IMAGE]
 	   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]   Time  is running out,     Valentine's  Day is February 14th, and we've partnered  with Proflowers.com to make this day extra special. Send a beautiful  bouquet of long-stemmed Sweetheart Roses for an astonishingly low  $39.99 (plus shipping by FedEx), and we  will include complimentary delicious Ghirardelli chocolate in a  beautiful velvet heart shaped box.     Proflowers' unique "Direct from the grower" system gives you twice  the freshness at half the price and lets you enjoy a seven-day freshness  guarantee . You also get quick delivery when you've suddenly remembered  you should have ordered flowers and automatic e-mail confirmations  that tell you exactly when your flowers are shipped and exactly  when they're delivered.          [IMAGE]      Proflowers will include a FREE BOX OF FAMOUS GHIRARDELLI  CHOCOLATES in a velvet heart shaped box with any magnificent  flowers you send!          Fabulous One Dozen Long Stemmed Red Roses   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE]        [IMAGE]    [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   20 Amazing Sweetheart Tulips   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE]        Quantities  are limited so place your order for Valentine's Day delivery now. CLICK  HERE TO ORDER!       Check out our other unbelievable Valentine's Day values. You will get  a box of free Ghirardelli chocolate with any flower order.    NOTHING says "Happy  Birthday," or "I Love You," or "Thank You,"  or "I Miss You," or just "I Care" better than  beautiful, fresh, lovely and deliciously fragrant flowers, especially  gorgeous long-stemmed roses!      CLICK  HERE TO ORDER!       To contact Proflowers  by phone, call the toll-free hotline, 1-888-FRESHEST (1-888-373-7437)  and mention FunnyMoney to get your special offer.
[IMAGE]		[IMAGE]


---------------------- Forwarded by Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT on 12/04/2000
04:22 PM ---------------------------

Chris Abel
08/11/2000 11:38 AM
To: Michael Benien/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Daniel Falcone/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Michael
E Moscoso/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gabriel Monroy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robin
Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rahmaan Mwongozi/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: book admins

The attached list includes all Liquids book administrators, their respective
files and their phone numbers.  Please use this list to contact the
appropriate person when any originations issue arises.

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Abel/HOU/ECT on 08/11/2000 11:31 AM
---------------------------

John Swinney
08/11/2000 11:17 AM
To: Chris Abel/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: book admins

Admin   DPR   Phone #

John Swinney  BAS0800  3-9111
   SpecII0800
   Spec0800
   Metals0800

Pat Stafford  0800dbrc  5-8638
   0800dist
   0800dist2
   0800rprc
   USUK0800

Michelle Nelson 0800blrc  5-8091
   0800cfrc
   RES0800
   FRT0800

Sony Wilson  Ngl_0800  3-7729
   EGLI0800

Anjali Abraham  0800btx   3-7434
   0800plas

Shifali Sharma  wti0800   3-5170
   wti_prepay_0800
   0800CAN

I think this is it.  If you need anything else, let me know

John


Since NNG is allocating storage you may get a call from USGT wanting to bring gas into NNG from Transok or Oasis going to TW. If they do they will  get all  parties on the phone and make sure everyone agrees to start flow real time at receipt and delivery point. Also USGT would need to fax a nomination into gas control the following morning so that it is accounted for. (Like we do with Minnigasco) Be sure and log this and let your relief know so that we don't miss it the next morning.

Gary


Thanks for the info...you are a wealth of knowledge.  As for the jokes, I am
very afraid and yet undaunted.

Do me one last favor and tell Darren I said he's a real funny guy and that
there will, at some point, be appropriate pay-back.

Ted Noble
08/02/2000 01:01 PM
To: Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: And this one time at band camp...

I just don't know where to start with the last couple of sentences so I will
let any jokes pass for now but be afraid.  As for the people on the list, I
know them as follows:

John Massey: SMU, UT b-school, emissions trader and a funny guy - spent a few
drunken nights with him and he lives in your complex
Milind Pasad: India, UT b-school, really nice guy but no drinking or meat
eating (he drove me to get my car on Monday)
Kevin Ruscitti: UCLA mba and trades gas, nice guy
Claudio Riberto: works in my old group with Milind, very smart MIT mba nice
but quiet

I hope this helps and if you have any other questions, just let me know you
little hottie.

Susan M Scott
08/02/2000 10:14 AM
To: Ted Noble/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: And this one time at band camp...

Hey,

I know you are monumentally busy this week, but if you get five minutes today
shoot me back an email and let me know if you know any of the Associates
below.  They are all going to be at the dinner tonight so any info that would
boost my B.S. factor would be much appreciated.  I seem to remember you
mentioning John Massey on a couple of occasions but I have, albeit very
rarely, been known to be wrong.  Hope your day is going well and that you
aren't having to carry Darren too much.

Evan Betzer
Jay Epstein
Bill Keeney
John Massey
Milind Pasad
Kevin Ruscitti
Jennifer Adams
Farzad Farhangnia
Gautam Gupta
Claudio Ribeiro
Doug Sewell

-- I finally watched the movie last night.  I laughed, I cried...it became a
part of me.  Honestly though, it was a very funny flick.  So did John or
Fritz pass along the "Bible" to you?  (Whoever it was you can thank them for
me.)


Staff is considering very broad categories (buckets) which  might contain the issues in this proceeding that we might agree to give Judge  Birchman.  Our list is attached.
Also, Judge Birchman will probably ask us about cross  examination times.  If possible, it would be wise to be prepared with a  time estimate, either as a single entity or as a member of a group.  If  that's not possible, if you could prepare a list of witnesses you are not  interested in crossing, that might give him some indication that the December  phase  of the hearing could fit within the allotted  time.
 - issues 11-8.wpd


John,

Please find the expiration schedule below for the EOL COAL NYMEX monthly
products.

Please call with any questions.

-Chad Pennix
Ext. 33891


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 03/26/2001 08:18 AM -----

	Richard B Sanders
	03/25/2001 12:46 PM

		 To: Linda R Guinn/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: O&M Report 02-28-01

----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 03/25/2001 12:45 PM -----

	Vivian Nguyen/ENRON@enronXgate
	03/23/2001 10:39 AM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Claudia Meraz/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: O&M Report 02-28-01

Richard,

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you,
Vivian
5-3995


i don't know


Vince:

Michael Crew would like you to be a speaker on Wednesday, May 23rd
instead of the 24th at the Rutgers Conference.  Is this ok?

He is preparing the agenda and needs to know as soon as possible.

Shirley

---------------------- Forwarded by Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT on 03/21/2001
02:31 PM ---------------------------

"Michael A. Crew" <mcrew@andromeda.rutgers.edu> on 03/21/2001 10:07:52 AM
To: shirley.crenshaw@enron.com
cc: vkamins@enron.com, crri@andromeda.rutgers.edu,
kleindorfer@wharton.upenn.edu
Subject: Dinner speaker - May 23

Shirley,

This is to follow up today's conversation with Anita.  As mentioned Paul
Kleindorfer invited Vince to be our dinner speaker on Thursday, May 24.  On
reflection given the strong line up for Wednesday - Fred Kahn et al - we
would very much like Vince to be the speaker on Wednesday.  This will
conclude the day very well giving participants a strong incentive to be there
for the Wednesday.

I gather that this change should be acceptable to Vince.

We will show Vince's name as follows:

Wincety J. Kaminski

Managing Director - Research

ENRON

Jeremy will be em ailing you the program with this information immediately.

We would like to go to press today.  Failing that we can go to press
tomorrow.  We would very much appreciate your confirming this and making any
corrections or changes.  If you would respond to all of us it would be
appreciated.

Michael
Michael A. Crew
Professor II
Director - Center for Research in Regulated Industries
Editor - Journal of Regulatory Economics
Rutgers University, Graduate School of Management
180 University Avenue
Newark, N.J. 07102-1897

phone: 973 353 5049   fax:  973 353 1348
http://www-rci.rutgers.edu/~crri


----- Forwarded by Cindy Derecskey/Corp/Enron on 05/01/2001 10:53 AM -----

	Linda Robertson
	05/01/2001 10:40 AM

		 To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Janel
Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Text of Dick Cheney's Toronto speech yesterday

 - AP - 4.30.doc


Sara, please disregard the email that I sent you about the Product Long
Description. Either Carlos or myself will get the correct Long Descriptions
to you tomorrow. I appologize for any inconvenience that I may have caused.
Regards
jr
---------------------- Forwarded by Justin Rostant/HOU/ECT on 02/27/2001
03:32 PM ---------------------------

From:  Justin Rostant
    02/21/2001 10:05 AM

To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FX Currency Long Descriptios

Sara, attached you will find the Product Long Descriptions for the FX
products.
 If you have any questions call me at 3-6460
jr

---------------------- Forwarded by Justin Rostant/HOU/ECT on 02/21/2001
09:58 AM ---------------------------

From:  Carlos Alatorre @ ENRON
             02/21/2001 09:32 AM

To: Justin.Rostant@enron.com
cc:
Subject: LME last change

---------------------- Forwarded by Carlos Alatorre/NA/Enron on 02/21/2001
09:35 AM ---------------------------

From:  Carlos Alatorre
     02/21/2001 09:14 AM

To: sara.shackleton@enron.com
cc:

Subject: LME last change

Sara,
Please find attached your approved document with a last minute change, please
take a look and let us know if you are OK with it.
Also, you can find the GTC disclaimer (essentially the same as for all
internal products)

Please let us know your approval or comments. I'll  really appreciate your
prompt response since, as mentioned, we need to have both documents ready on
the system by noon today in order to have them uploaded into the database and
ready for trading next Monday,

Thank you
Carlos
x5-8075


Thanks, you might look at 10/27 also.  It looks like this day is off the
other way (too high).  Thanks.

Jerry

-----Original Message-----
From: Janzen, Randy [mailto:Randy.Janzen@ENRON.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2001 7:23 AM
To: Janzen, Randy; Woodson, Harry; dkurth@ong.com; jmosher@ong.com;
jknight@ong.com; Forbish, Sherry; Linhart, Joe; McDaniel, Janet; Sturr,
Kathy; Hibbard, Scott; Benningfield, Robert; Greaney, Chris; Adams,
Jean; Blair, Lynn; Darveaux, Mary; Floyd, Jodie; Kile, Rick; Mendez,
Angela; Stage, Michael G.; Schoolcraft, Darrell; Spraggins, Gary;
January, Steve; Corman, Shelley; Cessac, Kenneth; Berger, Larry;
McCarran, Penny; Herber, Stephen; Vaughan, Cara
Subject: Bushton Balance through 10-26-01 - UPDATE - Please disregard
previous Bushton Report for 26th!

I talked to Steve in NNG Gas Control to see why we had such a difference
in the PVR Shrink for the 26th.  He is showing the volume for the PVR
measured @ 96.7 which would be only a 2,481 difference and make the
monthly only 4,654 difference.  I also went out into PGAS and confirmed
the volume measured was indeed 96.7 dth.  Apparently we have an issue
between PGAS and the TMS system.

I will get with Harry, the PGAS group, and the TMS in the morning to see
if we can figure out what is going on.  So please disregard the Bushton
Report for the 26th.

Randy

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Janzen, Randy
> Sent:	Sunday, October 28, 2001 6:51 AM
> To:	Woodson, Harry; 'dkurth@ong.com'; 'jmosher@ong.com';
> 'jknight@ong.com'; Forbish, Sherry; Linhart, Joe; McDaniel, Janet;
> Sturr, Kathy; Hibbard, Scott; Benningfield, Robert; Greaney, Chris;
> Adams, Jean; Blair, Lynn; Darveaux, Mary; Floyd, Jodie; Kile, Rick;
> Mendez, Angela; Stage, Michael G.; Schoolcraft, Darrell; Spraggins,
> Gary; January, Steve; Corman, Shelley; Cessac, Kenneth; Berger, Larry;
> McCarran, Penny; Herber, Stephen; Vaughan, Cara; Janzen, Randy
> Subject:	Bushton Balance through 10-26-01
>
> Attached is the Bushton Balance through October 26, 2001.  If you have
> any questions, please call me at 713/853-5962.
>
> Please note the change in volumes on the 26th.
>
> Randy Janzen
>
>
> 	 << File: NNG Bushton PVR 102601.pdf >>

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


It's my pleasure to attend -- I am looking forward to meeting you.

I will fly in the evening before and try to catch up with Kevin Garland and
Patrick Hickey. Perhaps if you are around we could meet for a drink.

Best regards,

David

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
David B. Aronoff???????? email: daronoff@greylock.com
General Partner???????? phone: 617 423 5525 x220
Greylock Partners????????? fax: 617 482 0059
One Federal St??????????? edial: http://davidaronoff.edial800.com
Boston, MA 02110

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff.Skilling@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Skilling@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 10:43 AM
To: daronoff@greylock.com
Subject: YPO Panel, April 24, 2001

David,

Many thanks for agreeing to speak at our YPO session on April 24, 2001, in
Houston.? The meeting will be held at Enron Broadband Services' network
equipment staging building, which is close to downtown.? We anticipate
attendance of about 100 people.

Breakfast will begin at 7:30 a.m., and the program will run from 8:15 a.m.
to 10:15 a.m.? The subject is "New Trends in Technology and Venture
Capital."? You will be on a panel discussion with two other venture
capitalists.? I expect the tone will be highly informal, but I will
schedule a conference call (probably in early March) to provide more
details and specific topics of interest.

Again, David, thank you.? I look forward to seeing you in April.

Jeff

?
 - David B. Aronoff (E-mail).vcf


Tych,

When you have a minute grab me to chat for five.

Chris


updated:   Aug  29, 2000 at 9:33


I say these people are crazy.

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Edwards [mailto:cedwards@completerx.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 3:22 PM
Subject: Dedication

Is this dedication or what?

http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/ap/20011006/us/burger_king_burns.html

Christopher W. Edwards, CPA
CompleteRx, Ltd.
One Riverway, Suite 600
Houston, TX 77056
(713) 355-1196
(713) 355-5404


It looks good.  I would also like to see how supportive the two attached
letters are.

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Chris Booth @ ENRON                           04/17/2001 03:49 PM

To: James P Studdert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, James L
Bouillion/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Ron Tapscott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Redmond/Enron@EnronXGate
Subject: Insurance Claim Letter

Lady and Gents,

Please review and comment.

Chris


Susan:
Please add the following to your memo:

I(B)
Footnotes #4 and 5 - revisit why FDI Act language is added.
Consult with Richard Sanders regarding Process Agent, arbitration and Waiver
of Jury Trial issues
Footnote #22 - Sara to draft language providing for a mutual Termination Event
Consult with Shari Stack regarding the need for the additional reps in
footnote #55
Sara to confirm that language for footnote #73 can be used as part of our
form for all counterparties

II(A)

Confirm that "ratings test" language in definitions of Letter of Credit and
Letter of Credit Default works and is what credit wants
Decide how "foreign bank" language in definition of Letter of Credit should
work
Confirm that our new Custodian language works for credit

II(B)

Can footnote #2 be deleted?

Thanks.

Carol


Kay,

I was out until today, have you gotten what you needed?

Genia

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	05/22/2001 04:02 PM

		 To: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Genia FitzGerald/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Black Hills tolling agreement

I have a tolling arrangement to work on. I'm trying to get my hands on the
Black Hills tolling agreement.  Can someone point me in the right direction
to find it?

Thanks,

Kay


Russell,
 Please review the attached draft of the draft Enfolio Master Firm
Purchase/Sale Agreement which has been drafted based on Exxon's comments as
necessary changes before they will allow the Mobil plant to schedule gas
under the terms of the October 1, 1995 Agreement.  I have merely incorporated
the credit language that was used in the October 1, 1995 agreement into this
agreement and have attempted to make the other changes that Exxon was
requesting.  Question, is the parent company still Mobil Corp. for the
purposes of the MAC.  Do you still agree with the prior credit requirements
as provided in the October 1, 1995 agreement, and if not, please provide me
with your updated requirements as early as possible this morning so that I
can incorporate into the agreement prior to presenting it to them for further
negotiation later today.

Lee,
 Please review the attached so that we can discuss which of their changes
have been made, which we did not make and the reasons therefor.  The quick
points being:  sentence at end of 2.3 which takes the place of their items
1-4; $0.15 to $0.05 in 3.2 and 3.4; item (iii) in 4.2 per their request #5
except I changes 30 business days to simply 30 days; I did not give them
their request #6 except I did incorporate the last two sentences of their
request; I attempted to give them all of their requested #7 except I reworded
slightly for balance and the items we previously discussed; did not do
request #8 because we will incorporate that in the Transaction Agreement;
gave them their request #9, gave them their request #10 except I left in the
"as is, where is" and the line they omitted when they retyped; did not do
their item #11, added section 8.9 for termination of prior agreement; added
their items #12 and #13 but modified as we discussed; otherwise I updated the
contract and changed references for Buyer's Transporter to simply Company.
Anything else?

.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/19/2001
04:28 PM ---------------------------
From: Iris Mack/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/19/2001 03:22 PM
To: Scott Salmon/EU/Enron@Enron, Amitava Dhar/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Craig Chaney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Mumford/LON/ECT@ECT, Eric
Kirkpatrick/EU/Enron@Enron, Richard Brent/EU/Enron@Enron, Ben
Parsons/LON/ECT@ECT, George Albanis/LON/ECT@ECT, Vasant
Shanbhogue/ENRON@enronXgate, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: RE: D&B Contact Names

Hi again,

 As, I stated is a prior emails, the contact details for the RiskCalc folks
are as follows:

1.  Marc Brammer
Director of Strategic Sales
tel:  800.523.2627, x5706
mbrammer@MoodysRMS.com

2. Neal Clark
Vice President
Tel:  800.523.2627, x5701
nclark@MoodysRMS.com

 Neal said that he would be willing to set up a meeting between us and their
quants to better understand their model, the various inputs and whether or
not the model can be tweaked for less than the 17 specified inputs.

 Let me know if you guys wish to have Neal set up a conference between
Moody's quants and Enron folks in Houston and London.

Ciao,
Iris

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Salmon, Scott
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 3:00 PM
To: Mack, Iris; Dhar, Amitava
Cc: Chaney, Craig; Mumford, Mike; Kirkpatrick, Eric; Brent, Richard; Parsons,
Ben; Albanis, George
Subject: RE: D&B Contact Names

Iris/Amitava,

I may have already said this, but we've had so many e-mails and telephone
calls flying back and forth that I wanted to make sure I at least got this
much out to you.  Clearly, I would like you to set up the meeting with the
RiskCalc gurus to dig deeper into their methodology (as much as they'll tell)
and the impact of missing variables and any other idiosyncracies the model
may have.  Also try to get a better feel for how well they think the model
extends to other countries.  I know from a previous conversation with Lea
Carty and reading about the model that it was calibrated off North American
names but they suspect it might extend to other countries.  Conversely, I
know they are working efforts within Moody's Risk Management Services to
develop private (and probably public) firm models specific to regions.  One
they mentioned was Australia and also within Western Europe.  Data, as
always, was the issue.  See if the quants have any perspective on their
success/plan in that area.

Lastly, we truly appreciate the aggressive efforts you both have made toward
pushing off this private model initiative and I'm very confident we'll be
able to nail a firm plan down upon receipt of either D&B and/or Experian data.

Cheers,
Scott
---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Salmon/EU/Enron on 19/04/2001 20:51
---------------------------

Mike Mumford@ECT
19/04/2001 17:55
To: Scott Salmon/EU/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: RE: D&B Contact Names

---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Mumford/LON/ECT on 19/04/2001 17:59
---------------------------
From: Iris Mack/ENRON@enronXgate on 19/04/2001 09:23 CDT
To: Mike Mumford/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Amitava Dhar/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: RE: D&B Contact Names

Hi,

 Two RiskCalc sales people made a presentation this week about their product.

 They stated that they could set up a meeting with their quants and our
people to discuss the model input and what happens if we have less than 17
inputs.

Regards,
Iris

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mumford, Mike
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 1:37 AM
To: Mack, Iris
Subject: RE: D&B Contact Names

Ooops... part II.

I just threw out 12 as a number for something we might develop... it's really
not based on anything.  We know 17 will work for pre-packaged programs.  We
also know there will be a great number of names with less than the full 17...
I assume we would pursue another model (internal or external) to provide
probably less accurate numbers but at least available for names with fewer
inputs.

Mike

From: Iris Mack/ENRON@enronXgate on 18/04/2001 15:02 CDT
To: Mike Mumford/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Amitava Dhar/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott Salmon/EU/Enron@Enron, Eric
Kirkpatrick/EU/Enron@Enron

Subject: RE: D&B Contact Names

Hi Mike,

 Thanks for your email.

 What do you mean by "buying blind  all major data associated with these
specific DUNS numbers"?

 I am puzzled about why you would be looking at 17 vs 12 fields.  I know
RiskCalc requires 17 inputs and seem to apply that the model does not work
for less than 17.  Yesterday the RiskCalc sales people could not guarantte
that their model would work for less than the required 17 data inputs.  They
suggested that this would be a question to direct towards their quants who
developed the model.

Regards,
Iris

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mumford, Mike
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 1:20 PM
To: Mack, Iris
Cc: Dhar, Amitava; Salmon, Scott; Kirkpatrick, Eric
Subject: RE: D&B Contact Names

Iris,

Thanks.

After our meeting we stuck around to discuss things a little further.

Specifically with respect to global counterparty names... we have DUNS
cross-references on about 70 of active names (13k out of 18.5k).  We could
greatly accellerate purchase of some useful data by buying blind all major
data associated with these specific DUNS numbers.

Pro  -  Data gets in on names we know we want to review ASAP, but without
resolution on which specific fields are most useful.  We also get to test for
completeness of data (how many have all 17 fields... how many have only 12 of
which fields, etc.).

Con  -  Costs could be significantly higher... buying info we don't know we
need (converse of buying only the 17 fields doesn't seem best answer).  We
would end up buying additional info later... overhead costs and piecemeal
buying will increase costs.  IT development time would be greatly
increased... multiple file formats... developing to unknown maximum size,
etc.... redoing when more data is purchased.

Any thoughts.

Mike


It's been changed to Avista.

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
04/17/2001 12:44 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: deal 584117 error

deal 584117
Mike Swerzbin

Prebon sent over the confirm for this deal and they are saying the cp should
be Avista not Duke


HOUSTON PIPE LINE COMPANY,S 75TH ANNIVERSARY
MOODY GARDENS HOTEL
GALVESTON, TEXAS
September 9, 2000

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Houston Pipe Line Company,s 75th Anniversary celebration is right around the
corner.  To help you plan for the event, we,ve developed a list of questions
and answers. Look for future updates via email and if you have a question,
please send it to meetingstop@aol.com.

? How do Houston Pipe Line employees RSVP for the anniversary celebration?
Register via email  -- the sooner the better! You provide minimal information
via email to our event coordinator on the form you,ve received with this
email.  NOTE: Registration ends August 15.

? Can I bring my children for a family weekend outing?
The celebration is for Houston Pipe Line employees and a guest.

? What are check-in and checkout times at the hotel?
Check-in at Moody Gardens Hotel is 4 pm Saturday and checkout is at noon
Sunday. Although early room check-in is unlikely on Saturday, employees may
arrive early and check their luggage in the hotel lobby to enjoy the Moody
Gardens attractions. Rooms will be assigned as they become available
throughout Saturday. We,ll give you specifics on the check-in process in
future updates.

? Can I reserve a room for Friday, September 8?  What is the room rate?
A limited number of rooms may be available on Friday night for $129.00
(single or double).  Houston Pipe Line employees should contact the hotel
directly to make Friday reservations. The phone number for Moody Gardens
Hotel is 888/388-8484 or 409/781-8484.

? Should I use my personal credit card for incidental expenses?
Yes, you should use your personal credit card for incidental expenses, such
as long distance phone calls.  Just present your credit card at check-in.

? What is the dress code for the weekend?
Cocktail attire is appropriate for the anniversary celebration.  Black tie is
optional!  Comfy relaxed attire is mandatory for enjoying Moody Garden
attractions.

? Can I include the mileage to Galveston on my expense report?
Travel to and from Moody Gardens Hotel is not eligible for expense
reimbursement.

? Which meals are included during my hotel stay?
The celebration includes Saturday night cocktails and dinner.
Houston Pipe Line employees will receive two drink tickets each for the
cocktail hour or at dinner. Cash bars will be available during the
celebration.

? What time is the official company celebration over?
Employees and guests are on their own and free to enjoy Galveston after
dinner Saturday night and on Sunday.  As a reminder, checkout time is at noon
on Sunday.

? What are +Garden Dollars8 and do I have access to all Moody Gardens
attractions?
Houston Pipe Line employees and guests will each receive +garden money,
valued at $35.00. +Garden money, can be used throughout the complex to enjoy
attractions or for a spa service.

? Doesn,t Moody Gardens have an incredible spa?
Yes, employees should contact The Spa at Moody Gardens Hotel to schedule
appointments for all spa services.  The Spa offers a variety of services
including massages, body wraps and treatments, hydrotherapy baths and
facials. Call The Spa at 888/388-8484 or 409/683-4440 to schedule an
appointment.

? Does the hotel have a designated parking area?
Hotel guests may enjoy covered parking located at the entrance to the
complex, behind the hotel. Note a posted sign at the parking garage entrance
reads "Valet Only", but hotel guests are free to use the garage.

*************************************************************

EMPLOYEE CELEBRATION
 REGISTRATION

Plan to attend?
Enjoy easy, speedy registration?
Send information requested below to meetingstop@aol.com.
Expect registration confirmation via email.
Register early!  Register now!

1) Employee,s Name

2) Employee,s Daytime Phone Number

3) Guest,s Name

4) Overnight Accommodations  (select one of each category)
 ? King Bed or Two Queen Beds
 ? Smoking or Non-Smoking room

5) Dinner Only?  Yes / No

6) Do you want +Garden Dollars, for Moody Gardens Hotel or Attractions?   Yes
/ No


In regard to the special delivery point language for April-02 and beyond:
Please use me as a liasion between the Portland traders and yourselves to
ensure these deals get entered correctly. The traders are aware that they
need to specify whether or not they'd like the counterparty to see this
special language; however, if deals get through to the Confirms department
without specification in the comments section, I'd like to be notified. In
this way, we can resolve the matter quickly and efficiently and hopefully
avoid a larger problem down the road.

Thanks for your help on this.

Kate


Sara:  This would be for industrials, not munis.

C

From: Sara Shackleton on 12/11/2000 09:27 AM CST
To: Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Draft ISDA

Chris:

Please call me and let's discuss.  My hesitancy comes from the big difference
in the ISDA for general corporates and GOVERNMENTALS (which you know are
treated differently).

Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 12/11/2000 09:25 AM -----

	Chris H Foster
	12/07/2000 06:38 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Draft ISDA

Sara:

There is more and more interest amongst our custoemrs in the West in looking
at Swaps.  I want to be able to show them how the ISA contract fits together
with the credit support annex and confirmation letter.  I have built a pro
forma Cofirrm based on the SoCal Water deal you worked on with me.  Can you
make a pro forma master and credit support annex so we can fax or e-mail
these to potential clients so we can try to get their interest and encourage
them to get contracts and credit in place with us?  I know you are hesitant
to do this, but it would help our marketing significantly.

Thanks

Chris

Ca


I couldn't open link.  I s this something new for me to sign or have I already complied?
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 07/11/2001 01:19 PM ---------------------------

Office of the Chairman - Enron Wholesale Services <legalonline-compliance@enron.com> on 07/11/2001 10:15:47 AM
Please respond to legalonline-compliance@enron.com

To:	KEAN@mailman.enron.com, STEVEN <skean@enron.com>

cc:

Subject:	Confidential Information and Securities Trading

To:KEAN, STEVEN
Email:skean@enron.com - 7138531586

Enron Wholesale Services - Office of the Chairman

From:  Mark Frevert, Chairman & CEO
      Mark Haedicke, Managing Director & General Counsel

Subject:  Confidential Information and Securities Trading

To keep pace with the fluid and fast-changing demands of our equity trading activities, Enron Wholesale Services ("EWS") has recently revised its official Policies and Procedures Regarding Confidential Information and Securities Trading ("Policies and Procedures"). These revisions reflect two major developments: (1) our equity trading activities have been extended into the United Kingdom, and (2) in an effort to streamline the information flow process, the "Review Team" will play a more centralized role, so that the role of the "Resource Group" is no longer necessary.You are required to become familiar with, and to comply with, the Policies and Procedures. The newly revised Policies and Procedures are available for your review on LegalOnline, the new intranet website maintained by the Enron Wholesale Services Legal Department. Please click on the attached link to access LegalOnline:

http://legalonline.corp.enron.com/chinesewall.asp

If you have already certified compliance with the Policies and Procedures during the 2001 calendar year, you need not re-certify at this time, although you are still required to to review and become familiar with the revised Policies and Procedures. If you have not certified compliance with the Policies and Procedures during the 2001 calendar year, then you must do so within two weeks of your receipt of this message. The LegalOnline site will allow you to quickly and conveniently certify your compliance on-line with your SAP Personal ID number. If you have any questions concerning the Policies or Procedures, please call Bob Bruce at extension 5-7780 or Donna Lowry at extension 3-1939.


Anthony:

Attached for your review are clean and blacklined copies of your form of assignment, which note our comments.  Please let me know if the attached changes are acceptable.

The only outstanding issue on our executing the new OSLA in favor of Morgan Stanley Securities Limited is our review of the Borrower's warranties which were not a part of the OSLA we executed with Morgan Stanley & Co. International Limited.

Thanks!

Marie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Anthony Capolongo <A.Capolongo@morganstanley.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Anthony+20Capolongo+20+3CA+2ECapolongo+40morganstanley+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Monday, July 02, 2001 8:18 AM
To:	aneela.charonia@enron.com; Heard, Marie
Cc:	Joseph Marovich; Ketan Parekh
Subject:	Assignment of OSLA

Marie:

Attached is an assignment for the OSLA signed in 1997, they may work.
Please review and let me know if you have any comments.

Anthony

 - Enron - ECT Invest OPT.doc << File: Enron - ECT Invest OPT.doc >>


Please consider the following retired judges from Chicago.  I don't know any
of them personally and there is a good chance that neither does Paul Weiss:
Abner Mikva, Seymour Simon, Frank McGarr.  They come highly recommended by
my friend Marv Aspen, the Ch. Judge of the ND Ill.

Steve Susman
713/653-7801
Pager 888/562-1184
Fax  713/654-6670

-----Original Message-----
From: Williams, Robert C. [mailto:Robert.C.Williams@ENRON.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 9:44 AM
To: Haedicke, Mark; Mordaunt, Kristina; Sanders, Richard; Derrick Jr.,
James; Walls Jr., Rob
Cc: Johnny W. Carter; Steve Susman; Kenneth S. Marks
Subject: Arbitrators for Blockbuster Arbitration

We have been given a new list of potential arbitrators.  Please take a
minute and let me know if any of these represent us, and the general
level of representation.  Thank you again for your help.  If you want to
leave me a voicemail, my telephone number is (713) 646-6412.

     1.  William Frank Carroll--Donohoe, Jameson & Carroll
     2.  James E. Coleman Jr.--Carrington, Coleman, Sloman & Blumenthal
     3.  Randall Duke--Johnson & McElroy
     4.  Edward Fiorito--Consultant
     5.  Eric F. Hale, Jr.--formerly with Carrington, Coleman; now
self-employed
     6.  Herbert J. Hammond--Thompson & Knight
     7.  Orrin Harrison--V&E
     8.  Brian J. Hurst--Baker & McKenzie
     9.  C. Michael Moore--Locke Liddell
    10.  Robert C. Prather, Sr.--Jordan, Dunlap, Prather & Harris,
L.L.P.

No need to respond as to V&E or Locke Liddell, except as to information
about the individuals.  Steve et al.,  Baker & McKenzie does represent
Enron on several matters of which I am aware, but to my knowledge it is
not one of our top 10 firms in billings.


Jeanne,

I think you are saying more and going into more detail than we need to.  It
was my understanding from the call that you were not going to get into the
statutory interpretation issues at all.

I think modifying the first sentence of the carryover to the top of page 2
(at least as printed on my machine) is fully sufficient if you just say:

"Moreover, EPMI submits that DWR has presented the Commission with a
reasonable [STRIKEOUT interpretation of the STRIKEOUT]  approach for
implementing the applicable statutory language."

I do not understand the benefit of the balance of the paragraph.  It opens us
up to getting drug into a interpretation argument we do not need to be in.

Similarly, I do not understand why we would want to say "is consistent with
the statutory language" and similar statements in the following paragraph.

I am not sure I agree fully with those statements or that we need to be
limiting our ability to respond to any further proposals which may come out
by taking a firm position of the statutory foundation for CDWR's approach in
this letter.

Am I missing something?   Thanks

>>> JBennett <JBennett@GMSSR.com> 03/21 11:26 AM >>>
Attached, per our conference call of earlier this morning, are short and
sweet comments on the March 14, 2001 letter of DWR re CPA implementation.
Please provide any comments/questions  to me as soon as possible.

<<X22873.DOC>>

Jeanne Bennett


There are 2 sheets in the following attachment that contain Enron transactional data for the Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) and Dynegy Direct, labeled as follows:
"Enron Activity - Dynegy Direct"
"Enron Activity - ICE"

Note: Total activity for Dynegy Direct is not available, therefore Enron's Percentage can not be calculated.

Let me know if you have any questions or comments.

Matt Motsinger
EnronOnline
713-853-5221

<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  ? 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now in the most recent version of Adobe Acrobat 4.0 and they
should print clearly from Adobe Acrobat Reader 3.0 or higher. Adobe Acrobat
Reader 4.0 may be downloaded for FREE from www.adobe.com.

(See attached file: AGAMAIL.pdf)
 - AGAMAIL.pdf


Thanks for the update.  I also want to thank everyone for a job well done.
You all worked great as a team and proved that IT projects can be completed
on time and with relatively few problems.  Unify Financial Settlements could
serve as an example for future IT project implementations.

	From:  Jefferson D Sorenson                           06/28/2000 03:39 PM

To: Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Unify

Today is the first day for Financial Settlements to use Unify in Production
(Penultimate settlement).  We will keep you posted on results.

Jeff

---------------------- Forwarded by Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT on
06/28/2000 09:32 AM ---------------------------

Rebecca Ford
06/27/2000 06:48 PM
To: Kenneth M Harmon/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Cynthia Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steve Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard
Brockhan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Hoong P Foon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kip Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Philip R Glass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Johnson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Bob
Klein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Unify

Hey Ken,

I just wanted to let you know that the Financial Settlement group were very
impressed with Unify during the first training class that we had on Friday.
I did not hear any negative comments, and they even said they liked it better
than SIFT.  Some of the key areas in which they see great benefit are:

1.  the automatic calculation of in and out of the money options
2.  the statement group assignment screen and the idea of selecting different
statement groups for different payment terms
3.  the ability to sort and subtotal on financial list screen
4.  the system is more efficient than SIFT
5.  the ability to view the invoice on screeen and to click directly on the
line to make adjustments
6.  the ability to wire foreign currencies (really and SAP enhancement)

One thing that I did hear is that they wished they could see Enron North
America AND ENA Global together on the financial list screen.

I think the development group did a great job, and I enjoyed working with
everyone.  I hope that in the next few weeks and months ahead that you will
continue to allow the team to provide our group with quick and efficient
response to areas of concern and enhancements.

Thank you to the group for all of your hard work,
Becky


yeah.  i had it picked out and everything.  i had to call the dealer and tell him i am not going to suprise you with it.  we can still go to dinner tomorrow night though.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 1:33 PM
To:	Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:	RE:

that's too bad.  so, does that mean i'm not getting my bmw from you anymore?

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 12:33 PM
To: erichardson@sarofim.com
Subject: RE:

our stock is taking a bath.

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Wednesday, October 24, 2001 12:20 PM
   To:     Lenhart, Matthew
   Subject:  RE:

    i was just about to email you.  why is it worthless?

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
   Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 12:14 PM
   To: erichardson@sarofim.com
   Subject: RE:

   my 401k is now worthless.  i have no money.

       -----Original Message-----
      From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
      Sent:   Thursday, October 18, 2001 2:28 PM
      To:     Lenhart, Matthew
      Subject:  RE:

      how was portland

      -----Original Message-----
      From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
      Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 12:49 PM
      To: erichardson@sarofim.com
      Subject: RE:

      great.  good to hear.  i got back last night.

          -----Original Message-----
         From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
         Sent:   Thursday, October 18, 2001 12:15 PM
         To:     Lenhart, Matthew
         Subject:  RE:

         yeah, it was horrible, i didn't think i was going to be able to
   make
      it.
         when did you get back.

         -----Original Message-----
         From: Lenhart, Matthew [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com]
         Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 11:54 AM
         To: erichardson@sarofim.com
         Subject:

         did you miss me while i was gone?

   **********************************************************************
         This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
      affiliate
         and
         may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use
   of
      the
         intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or
   disclosure
      by
         others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
   recipient
      (or
         authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the
   sender
      or
         reply
         to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
   delete
         all
         copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto)
   are
      not
         intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or
      evidence
         a
         binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of
   its
         affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may
      not
         be
         relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
      otherwise.
         Thank you.

   **********************************************************************


---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/HOU/EES on 03/15/2000 04:52
PM ---------------------------

Richard Shapiro
12/16/98 05:30 PM
To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Fwd: Anti-motivational pictures.

---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES on 12/16/98 05:30
PM ---------------------------

	Enron Energy Services

	From:  Sue Nord                           12/16/98 04:58 PM
	Phone No: 603 224-5942

To: Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Fwd: Anti-motivational pictures.

I particularly recommend "mistakes" and "mediocrity."

---------------------- Forwarded by Sue Nord/HOU/EES on 12/16/98 04:47 PM
---------------------------

"Robert Shapiro" <rshapiro@rubinrudman.com> on 12/11/98 12:00:25 PM

To:	marty@aoainc.com, Sue Nord/HOU/EES, stierney@erginc.com,
peter_nelson@facing.org, amy.lederer@justice.usdoj.gov, klionsh@nu.com
cc:

Subject:	Fwd: Anti-motivational pictures.

I'm sorry to clog up your email in boxes, but I found the attached to be
pretty interesting.  However, some nagging questions remain:  Who are the
people creating these things?  How do they have the time to design and
compile this stuff?

Received: from brixton.chirondiag.com ([206.66.255.2]) by k-plaw.com
(GroupWise SMTP/MIME daemon 4.1 v3) ; Wed,  9 Dec 98 13:18:02 EST
Received: from mail-server.chirondiag.com (mail-server.chirondiag.com
[172.26.4.231]) by brixton.chirondiag.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id
NAA26675; Wed, 9 Dec 1998 13:31:39 -0500 (EST)
Received: from cclink.chirondiag.com (MEDCCLINK1.chirondiag.com
[172.26.4.83]) by mail-server.chirondiag.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id
NAA24874; Wed, 9 Dec 1998 13:24:38 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ccMail by cclink.chirondiag.com  (IMA Internet Exchange 3.11)
id 0005ADCD; Wed, 9 Dec 1998 13:24:36 -0500
Message-ID: <0005ADCD.C21246@chirondiag.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Dec 1998 13:23:37 -0500
From:  <Michael.Sampson@chirondiag.com>
To: kcalz@aol.com,scarrabba@aol.com, jbreslow@bigyellow.com,
Dana.Staub@chirondiag.com, James.Drummey@chirondiag.com,
Richard.Horlbeck@chirondiag.com, papagelG@execrisk.com,
tglowik@ivexpackaging.com, TMCENANEY@k-plaw.com, rfeilteau@kdecpa.com,
Alan_Osetek/KFS@kessler.com, Jason.Brown@nbc.com.at.cclink, kujae@pfizer.com,
fiste@psnsbsn.navy.mil, lawrence.cash@state.ma.us, Joe_giordano@tlp-llc.com,
michael_viane@warnerbros.com
Subject: Anti-motivational pictures.
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_C89F82A8.07660A7B"

>Some of these are really funny!
>
> You should all print thesee out on color lasers and frame them for your
bosses
secret santa gift! LOL

 - PROCRAST.gif
 - APATHY.gif
 - DEFEAT.gif
 - FAILURE.gif
 - FUTILITY.gif
 - INEPTITU.gif
 - LOSING.gif
 - MEDIOCRI.gif
 - MISTAKES.gif
 - PESSIMIS.gif
 - AGONY.gif


really, so who then, me?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 10:23 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

yeah, but I don't know for who...I don't think I will be working for Chris.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 10:22 AM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

im glad to hear that, so are you going to be doing the same thing

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 10:21 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

Not at all...I just now got my offer letter...FINALLY.  What about you? Anything exciting?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 10:20 AM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:

anything exciting going on over there


Once you set the date and time let me know and Kirk Stevens, Jim Barnes, Jim
Murray and I will participate on the call.

>>> Hayslett, Rod 10/15/01 3:45:33 PM >>>
I would like to have a meeting on October 31st (maybe later if that date won't
work), either in the AM or the PM, but probably about 3 hours or so. I would
like to discuss organizations and how we are going to provide the support the
EGS organization requires both at Stan's level and at each level in the
organization. I would also like to discuss the top 3-5 concerns you have for
your business and your people. You should decide if there are people in your
organization that are needed to discuss basic functions of Planning,
Accounting, Finance and Tax and feel free to include them in this process, but
I would like to keep the group to Director level or above. Please let Kathy
know who they are. I would like to know if you are available or have a
preference for morning or afternoon.

Thanks.

Rod Hayslett
EB4054
713-853-6178


The 29th is OK for me other than it is NX1 for Natural Gas.  Starting at 3:00 makes it possible but 4:00 would be better or even the 30th at 3:00 would be better.  I am assuming that a lot of thought has gone in to picking this day and other conflicts exist.  The other gas traders are going to have the same issue with this time so if it is the only time that works for everybody then I'll be there at 3:00.

Tom

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Buckley, Karen
Sent:	Wednesday, October 10, 2001 2:17 PM
To:	Allen, Phillip K.; Arnold, John; Arora, Harry; Benson, Robert; Brawner, Sandra F.; Carson, Mike; Cuilla, Martin; Davis, Mark Dana; Ermis, Frank; Forney, John M.; Gilbert-smith, Doug; Grigsby, Mike; Holst, Keith; King, Jeff; Lewis, Andrew H.; Maggi, Mike; Martin, Thomas A.; May, Larry; Mckay, Brad; Mckay, Jonathan; Neal, Scott; Presto, Kevin M.; Schwieger, Jim; Shively, Hunter S.; Storey, Geoff; Sturm, Fletcher J.; Suarez, John; Zipper, Andy; Engler, Adrianne
Cc:	Lavorato, John; Kitchen, Louise
Subject:	ENA Trading Track - Interviews October

All,

Please mark you calendars, you  have been selected to participate in the  ENA Trading Track recruiting event Monday, October 29th , 3 pm - 7 pm.     If you are unable to interview on this date please advise.

A selection of you will telephone screen 18 external candidates, and decide whether or not they should proceed to the final round on the above date.    A separate e:mail will be sent in relation to this.

Any questions let me know.

Regards,

Karen
x54667


This whole experience must be too much fun for you...getting to work with all these young pilots (any of them single?) and strutting your stuff.

The trip to Park City was fantastic.  We had some really good meals and managed two solid days of skiing.  It dumped 2 feet of snow Sunday night so we had tons of powder on Monday to ski through...and to cushion our falls.  Tuesday was absolutely beautiful, sunny but still below freezing.  The views from a few of the runs at the top of the mountain were breath-taking.  Monique took all the pictures on her digital camera, so as soon as she uploads them I'll be able to check them out and order a few.  This is my first day back at work this week and it looks as though they're moving me to another floor pretty soon...too much sensitive information up here I suppose.  It's fine though because there are a few others from the trading group who declined the UBS offer and will be housed on the other floor as well, so I will have company.  I've got a couple other leads to try and track on the job front...another company in Seattle and one in Richmond, VA that my old trader Larry told me about.  I'm still glad I made the decision I did and am excited to see where that choice ultimately leads me.  Even Tobin (from my first group here at Enron) is trying to help my find something in the Pacific Northwest.  I'm really curious to see what he may come up with since his acquaintances run the gamut in terms of interests and occupations.

Glad to hear you're having a good time and helping out in the "effort", and I'll talk to you soon.

Love,
Subaru

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	coyote <CHARLIECOYOTE@compuserve.com>@ENRON   On Behalf Of coyote <CHARLIECOYOTE@compuserve.com>
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 9:07 AM
To:	Scott, Susan M.; Susan Scott
Subject:	How are you?

Suz, I'm using both addresses since I don't know which one is current.
Guess that you had a good time at Monique's and did a little skiing.  Hope
that work is going as well as it can under the circumstances.  We are
flying and having a good time out here.  It's fun to work with the Navy
again.  This time it is the carrier  Abraham Lincoln and her battle group.
 mostly we make attacks on her and fighters like F-14s and F-18's come up
and intercept us.  We are carrying electronic pods which jam and deceive
their radars and everybody gets some good training.  Yesterday I just got
out to the area which is south of San Clemente island off the coast of
Southern California and had a generator failure.  I was with another A-4
and he continued the mission.  I went back to Pt.Mugu and jumped into
another airplane and got back out for the second and third runs.  The whole
thing just about wore me out but it felt good to get the mission
accomplished.  Love, Dad


had to resend due to overworked network.  ss
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 03/07/2000
05:42 PM ---------------------------

Sara Shackleton
03/07/2000 05:03 PM
To: Lynn Aven/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: draft Argentina memo

please edit.  thanks.  sara


Attached is a clean and blacklined draft of the changes to the ISDA
Schedule.  We have also attached the proposed form of Enron Corp. Guaranty
and the legal opinions of Enron North America and Enron Corp.  The opinions
of Cadwalader with respect to the ISDA and the Guaranty will be sent shortly
under separate cover from Susan Lobel at Cadwalader.  It appears the only
remaining issue on the ISDA is the "Conditions Precedent" provision which
NYPA is still considering.

Please let me know if these changes meet with your approval.


Response re my inquiries re accounting treatment.
----- Forwarded by Barton Clark/HOU/ECT on 09/12/2000 09:55 AM -----

	Scott Healy
	09/07/2000 12:26 PM

		 To: Barton Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Jeffery Ader/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Heather
Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Conn Fuel Cell

Because ENA is getting a full prepayment of the turn-key construction amount,
I don't think that there will be a material balance sheet issue.  Worst case,
it is easy to do off-balance sheet financing when you have cash equal to the
total obligation.  Obviously, this will have to be vetted before the
transaction is executed.


Here is our forecast


:
Subject: Mtg. with Gas Assets Group

The date and time of the Baxter/Whalley meeting has been changed, please mark
your calendar as follows:

_______________________________________________________________

Please mark your calendar for the upcoming "ENA Gas Assets Meeting" with
Cliff Baxter and Greg Whalley.

 Date: Tuesday, March 7, 2000

 Place: EB 5c2

 Time: 2:00 - 3:00 p.m.


Still Looking for an
E-Commerce Solution?

[IMAGE]


STATES
UTAH -- Bill repealing merger of agencies goes to Gov. Leavitt
LA. -- PSC to seek reconsideration of allowing AT&T to sue commissioners

TEXAS -- PUC to enroll Lifeline customers automatically
WIS. -- Bill would bar passing on costs of city-owned cable TV to
nonsubscribers
MASSACHUSETTS -- WorldCom joins AT&T call for Verizon to cut UNE rates
TEXAS -- SW Bell performance measurement penalties total almost $2.6
million
NEW YORK -- Meeting set to organize opposition against Verizon DSL
WASHINGTON -- Bill would extend ban on mandatory local measured service
IOWA -- Legislator takes aim at telemarketers
MISSOURI -- PSC approves asset transfer from SWBT to SBC Services
OHIO -- PUC sets schedule for considering unresolved OSS issues

FUTURE OF REGULATION
UTAH
Bill repealing merger of agencies goes to Gov. Leavitt

The Legislature has approved HB 184 to repeal a controversial measure
(HB 320) approved by the Utah Legislature last year to fold the
Committee of Consumer Services into the Division of Public Utilities.
(1/24/00 a.m.)  HB 184 passed through both chambers within two days.
Absent repeal, HB 320, which wasn't scheduled to take effect until July
1, would combine and rename the entities as the Office of Public
Advocate.

Rep. David Ure (R., District 53), who sponsored HB 320, now is
sponsoring the bill to repeal it.  The legislative staff told TR he
decided the time isn't right to overhaul the structure of the state's
utility regulatory apparatus given current concerns about adequate
supplies of electricity in the West.  Questar Gas Co. had pushed for HB
320 last year.

The DPU is charged with representing the public interest before the
Public Service Commission and ensuring that all utility customers have
access to safe and reliable service at reasonable prices.  The Committee
of Consumer Services represents residential, small commercial, and
agricultural consumers before the commission.

Because HB 320 would combine the two missions into a single entity,
interest groups were concerned the bill would decrease the amount of
information available to the PSC when making decisions.

Consumer group opposition to HB 320 during the 2000 legislative session
persuaded Gov. Michael O. Leavitt (R.) to call for a review of the law
after the session concluded in March.  Leavitt allowed the bill to
become law without signing it.

SECTION 251/252
LOUISIANA
PSC to seek reconsideration of allowing AT&T to sue commissioners

The Public Service Commission has decided to ask the U.S. Court of
Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (New Orleans) to reconsider its Jan. 16
ruling that the 11th Amendment doesn't protect the PSC from a lawsuit
filed by AT&T Corp, a commission staff member told TR.  (1/18/01 p.m.)
The PSC has 45 days from Jan. 16 to file for rehearing, the staff member
said.

In 1997 AT&T filed suit against the PSC over an interconnection
agreement the commission arbitrated between AT&T and BellSouth
Telecommunications, Inc.  AT&T alleged that the agreement favored
BellSouth and that the PSC's arbitration didn't comply with sections 251
and 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996.  In addition, AT&T
brought a suit against the five commissioners under the Ex parte Young
doctrine, seeking relief from any arbitration determination that didn't
comply with sections 251 and 252 of the Act.

Reversing the district court's ruling against AT&T, the appeals court
maintained that the PSC waived its 11th Amendment sovereign immunity by
voluntarily accepting and fulfilling its assigned role in the federal
regulation of local competition under the federal Telecommunications Act
of 1996.  Furthermore, the appeals court ruled that AT&T's suit against
the individual commissioners could proceed even if the PSC were
protected under the 11th Amendment.  (Case no. 99-30421, AT&T
Communications v. BellSouth Telecommunications Inc.; Louisiana Public
Service Commission; Don Owen; Irma Muse Dixon; Dale Sittig; James M.
Field; Jack A. Blossman)

UNIVERSAL SERVICE
TEXAS
PUC to enroll Lifeline customers automatically

The Public Utility Commission yesterday approved rules allowing eligible
customers to be enrolled in the Lifeline program automatically.
(8/21/00 a.m.)  The rules require the PUC to work with local telephone
companies and the Department of Human Services to set up the Lifeline
Automatic Enrollment Program.

The department will identify customers who are eligible for the program
and provide their names to the local telephone companies.  The program
is scheduled to begin March 1.  (Project no. 21329)

VIDEO
WISCONSIN
Bill would bar passing on costs of city-owned cable TV to nonsubscribers

A bill introduced in the Senate would prohibit a municipality that owns
and operates a cable TV system from passing on the cost of the system to
nonsubscribers.  The prohibition wouldn't apply to a municipality that
began operating a cable TV system before the legislation's effective
date.

A municipality that began operating a cable TV system on or after the
legislation's effective date would be allowed to pass on to
nonsubscribers only the costs of public, educational, and governmental
access channels and the costs of debt service on public improvement
bonds for the construction, renovation, or expansion of the
municipality's cable TV system.

A municipality that owns and operates a cable TV system would have to
maintain records that include (1) the cost of franchise fees, pole
rentals, and all other expenses that the municipality would incur if it
were a nonmunicipal cable TV operator that had been granted a franchise
and (2) the amount, source, and cost of working capital used for the
municipality's cable TV system.

SB 23 has been referred to the Senate Committee on Health, Utilities,
Veterans, and Military Affairs.  Sen. Rodney Moen (D., District 31)
introduced it.

SECTION 251/252
MASSACHUSETTS
WorldCom joins AT&T call for Verizon to cut UNE rates

WorldCom, Inc., has asked the Department of Telecommunications and
Energy to force Verizon New England, Inc., to reduce its unbundled
network element (UNE) rates to "levels that reflect forward-looking
economic costs."  The WorldCom request came in a letter supporting AT&T
Corp.'s petition for lower Verizon UNE rates.

AT&T's petition had urged the DTE to withdraw its support for Verizon's
application to the FCC for authority to enter the interLATA (local
access and transport area) market in Massachusetts unless Verizon
reduced its rates.  WorldCom and AT&T assert that neither the rates
Verizon submitted in July nor the revised rates it submitted in October
are low enough to "allow economically viable competition via the
UNE-platform."  (1/3/00 a.m.)

WorldCom said the "most efficient and straightforward approach" to
promoting local competition is "to order that specific reduced rates be
put in place and to make clear that those rates will act as a ceiling in
pending and future rate cases."  (DTE 01-20)

LONG DISTANCE
TEXAS
SW Bell performance measurement penalties total almost $2.6 million

Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. has paid almost $2.6 million to the
Public Utility Commission for failing to meet performance measurements
established in its compliance monitoring proceeding from January 2000
through November 2000, the PUC staff told TR.  The proceeding aims to
ensure SW Bell's compliance with the market entry requirements of
section 271 of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996.

In June 2000 the FCC granted SW Bell authority to enter the Texas
interLATA service market.  (Project nos. 20000, 20400, and 21000)

ADVANCED SERVICES
NEW YORK
Meeting set to organize opposition against Verizon DSL

Silicon Alley Station and the New Networks Institute are sponsoring a
Feb. 5 meeting in Manhattan to discuss the "slow" rollout of digital
subscriber line (DSL) service in New York.  The groups said
"overwhelming anecdotal evidence" shows DSL service delivery has "lagged
well behind" demand.

The organizers blame Verizon New York, Inc., saying the company has been
"less than cooperative" in providing network access to competitive DSL
companies.  They claim Verizon has "frequently missed install
appointments, erroneously disqualified locations, and inadvertently
disabled working circuits."

The groups hope to attract consumer advocates, competitive DSL
providers, public officials, and concerned customers to the meeting,
where they will present a Broadband Bill of Rights and propose a
complaint resolution process.

Silicon Alley Station is an Internet radio network,
http://siliconalley.net, and the New Networks Institute is a broadband
research and consulting firm.  More information about the Feb. 5 meeting
is available at http://www.newnetworks.com.

CUSTOMER-AFFECTING
WASHINGTON
Bill would extend ban on mandatory local measured service

Rep. Aaron Reardon (D., District 38) has introduced HB 1287 to extend
the deadline for ending the ban against mandatory local measured service
from June 1, 2001, until June 1, 2005.  When companies offer measured
service plans, customers often are charged on the number of calls, the
time of day, the distance traveled, and the length of the call.  In
extending the ban against mandatory local measured service, HB 1287
ensures that customers are given a flat-rate option for their local
telephone service.

HB 1287 awaits consideration by the House Technology,
Telecommunications, and Energy Committee.

CUSTOMER-AFFECTING
IOWA
Legislator takes aim at telemarketers

Rep. Mark Smith (D., District 64) has introduced HF 78 to create a
no-call list for telephone subscribers who don't want to receive calls
from telemarketers.  The Department of Justice would be responsible for
administering the list.

Telephone subscribers would have to pay $10 to be placed on the list and
$5 each year to renew their listings.  Telephone solicitors would be
charged a $50 fee to access the list.  The Department of Justice would
have to adopt rules for administering the list.

Telemarketers making unsolicited telephone calls would have to identify
themselves immediately after making contact with a telephone subscriber.

HF 78 has been referred to the House Commerce and Regulation Committee.

AFFILIATE
MISSOURI
PSC approves asset transfer from SWBT to SBC Services

The Public Service Commission has granted Southwestern Bell Telephone
Co.'s request for authority to transfer some of its support assets to
SBC Services, Inc.  Both companies are wholly owned subsidiaries of SBC
Communications, Inc.  SBC Services intends to use the assets to offer
services to other SBC Communications subsidiaries, including SW Bell.

The order is available at
http://www.psc.state.mo.us/orders/01231368.htm.

LONG DISTANCE
OHIO
PUC sets schedule for considering unresolved OSS issues

The Public Utilities Commission has requested briefs and written
testimony by Feb. 1 on the remaining unresolved issues from
collaborative discussions on Ameritech-Ohio's operation support system.
Replies are due Feb. 22.

The remaining disputed issues include whether (1) the performance
measures should be applicable to special access services, (2)
Ameritech's billing system will support all unbundled network elements,
(3) Ameritech will expand its hours of availability, and (4) Ameritech
should be able to impose charges under its facilities modification
policy.  (Case no. 00-942-TP-COI - In the Matter of the Investigation
Into Ameritech-Ohio's Entry Into In-Region InterLATA Service Under
Section 271 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996)

Federal law prohibits duplication in any form, including electronic,
without permission of the publisher.

TR State NewsWire Copyright 1998, 1999, 2000 Telecommunications Reports
International, Inc. (ISSN 1082-9350) is transmitted each
business day at 8 a.m. and 2 p.m., except holidays.
Telecommunications Reports International, Inc.
1333 H St. NW, Suite 100-E
Washington, DC 20005-4707

Editor: George E. Brandon, E-mail: gbrandon@tr.com
Associate Editor for Online Publications: Jennifer Erschen, E-mail:
jerschen@tr.com
Senior Legislative & Regulatory Analyst: Gayle Kansagor, E-mail:
gkansagor@tr.com
Senior Research Analyst: Steve Arlowe, E-mail: sarlowe@tr.com
Senior Analyst: Barney McManigal, E-mail: bmcmanigal@tr.com
Research Analyst: Brandi Kerns, E-mail: bkerns@tr.com
Account Services: Eileen Callahan (202) 312-6116, (202) 842-3023 (fax)
E-mail: ecallahan@tr.com


Please go ahead and execute.  Thanks for checking with me.

Molly Sample@EOTT
04/26/2001 10:27 AM
To: Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Cindy Stark/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Axes-One/Computron

Resending.  I apologize-it went to your EOTT address.

Molly Sample
VP & General Counsel
EOTT Energy Corp.
713-993-5027
fax 713-402-2806
----- Forwarded by Molly Sample/Houston/Eott on 04/26/01 10:35 AM -----

	Molly Sample
	04/25/01 10:33 AM

		 To: Stan  Horton
		 cc: Lawrence Clayton/Houston/Eott@Eott
		 Subject: Axes-One/Computron

As you are aware, we have been pricing an upgrade to our Computron financial
accounting program.  The vendor selected was Axes-One, which is the new name
for Computron.  To keep the project on target for implementation, we have a
quote from the vendor that is good until May 1, 2001.  This is a budgeted
expenditure and the license fees are approximately $300,000.

Dana asked that I run this by you before we get the license signed.  Please
let me know if we can go ahead and execute this agreement.  If you have any
questions, please call me.  Thanks.

Molly Sample
VP & General Counsel
EOTT Energy Corp.
713-993-5027
fax 713-402-2806


Pursuant to Sara Shackleton's request, I am attaching a memo that I prepared
in April, 2000 regarding procedures for opening brokerage accounts.

Please do not hesitate to contact either Sara at x35620 or me with any
questions.

Marie Heard
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron North America Corp.
Phone:  (713) 853-3907
Fax:  (713) 646-3490
Marie.Heard@Enron.com


cool beans

Jeff Dasovich@EES
09/07/2000 05:56 PM
To: Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Sandra_McCubbin@ees.enron.com, Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Susan J
Mara/SFO/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re: California Meeting

Looks like I won't be going to Washington, but I will participate in the
strategy meeting by phone on the 12th.

"Mary Hain" <Mary.Hain@enron.com> on 09/07/2000 07:15:55 PM

To:	Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L
Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, "Sarah Novosel" <Sarah.Novosel@enron.com>, "Joe
Hartsoe" <Joe.Hartsoe@enron.com>, James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, "Paul Kaufman"
<Paul.Kaufman@enron.com>, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, "Richard Sanders"
<Richard.Sanders@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:	California Meeting

Here's the latest info. about the FERC meeting.  Only Commissioners and their
Staffs will be attending, no additional FERC Staff (no one from the Office of
Markets and Tariff Rates).  The Meeting is mostly an opportunity for customers
to blow off steam.  Presentations will be made by the three IOUs, one
generator,
one marketer (Enron) and one ESP, UCAN, and various politicians.  When I get
the
list I'll forward it.  Each presenter will have about five minutes with no
questions from the audience.  Panelists should expect questions and discussion
among panelists or in response to Commissioner's questions.

Attached is the latest FERC notice about the California meeting.  It
recognizes
that there may be discussions about pending FERC cases.  This does not mean
FERC
will be grilling our panelist about these cases.  Rather, FERC has to issue
this
notice so if someone talks about an issue pending in one of those cases, the
Commissioners don't violate the government in the sunshine rules.

(See attached file: EL00-91.1)

 - EL00-91.1


After 7 long months, the stork has finally arrived!!!   My husband and I have
been in the process of adapting a baby girl.  I am elated to inform you that
our 14 month old bundle of joy will be permanently place in our home on the
16th of this month.  I will be out of the office that week to get her settled
in with her new family.

Samantha M. Boyd
Sr. Legal Specialist
Enron North America, Corp.
1400 Smith, EB3802A
Houston, TX  77002
Phone:  (713) 853-9188
Fax:  (713) 646-3490
email:  samantha.boyd@enron.com


Mark and Steve,

I'm forwarding this "FYI".......Chris's work looks great!  I'll coordinate
the filming they're interested in.  I may suggest they use Beth Steir, as our
people know her and she knows our system--I'll discuss this with Chris.

With further regard to Harvard, I'm working with two other big initiatives
with various faculty there, and trying to coordinate "Harvard with
Harvard"---that is, trying to keep all Harvard's faculty pursuing Enron
projects, in each other's respective "loops"..I've also been trying to keep
Pankaj Ghemawat in these loops out of respect to his position on Enron's
Advisory Committee.

Thanks!

--Christie.
---------------------- Forwarded by Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT on 11/08/2000
09:29 AM ---------------------------

Christopher Bartlett <cbartlett@hbs.edu> on 11/08/2000 08:59:56 AM
To: christie.patrick@enron.com
cc: jeff.skilling@enron.com, mwozny@hbs.edu
Subject: Enron case study

Dear Christie:

First I wanted to thank you belatedly for the excellent organization you
provided in setting up our meetings in Houston a couple of weeks ago.  The
information we got was right on target and Meg and I came back with full
notebooks and bulging heads.  It was a very useful and productive trip from
our point of view, and we very much appreciated your very professional
organization of the process.

Having worked on the drafts over the last couple of weeks, we have come to
the conclusion that the material is just too rich to fit into a single
case.  In dividing our story into two parts, we focused our first case on
the transformational story that unfolded during the 1990s, not only on the
strategic changes occurring within the company but also on the
organizational and managerial redesign that supported and drove those new
directions.  The second case will encapsulate some of that company
background, but will focus in more detail on the way in which the new Enron
environment sparked the Enron Online innovation.  I have used this approach
a couple of times previously, focusing on entrepreneurship at 3M and on
human resource management at Microsoft, and for your information I will
forward copies of those two-part cases as models of what we are working
towards.

The other thing I wanted to update you on was our plans to make these cases
as interactive as possible.  Given Enron's transition into the "new
economy" and particularly the focus of the Enron Online case, we feel it is
very important to develop these cases in a multimedia manner. This means
that we will try to provide links to video material, Websites, streamed
interviews, etc. wherever they can support the development of the story
line.  The videos you sent us following our last visit are a very good
starting point, but we should probably try to schedule videotaped
interviews with Jeff Skilling, Ken Lay, and Louise Packard for sometime in
the near future -- certainly before Christmas.

Thanks again for all your help and support in getting us this far.  Our
hope is that we can get some drafts to you over the next couple of weeks
for your review and input.  Meanwhile, Meg will be contacting you to see if
we can set up a day for the videotaped interviews.  We are greatly looking
forward to completing our work on this very exciting project.

Yours sincerely,
Chris Bartlett
 - 395017.doc
 - 300004.doc
 - 301002.doc
Christopher A. Bartlett
Harvard Business School
Morgan 465
Soldiers Field
Boston, MA 02163
U.S.A.
phone:  617-495-6308; fax: 617-496-5271
e-mail: cbartlett@hbs.edu


This is not good news. As you know, this financing was very important in
helping to solve the liquidity problem. John did tell me that they had good
meetings with the Embassy this week. My experience with OPIC tells me that
with a change in administration in Washington and the concerns John mentions
in his memo, we should not count on the financing. Thanks, Joe
---------------------- Forwarded by Joseph W Sutton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
09/14/2000 04:30 PM ---------------------------

	Enron International

	From:  John Hardy                           09/14/2000 02:40 PM

To: Joseph W Sutton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: Update on Azurix - Buenos Aires water project

Joe
 As an update to my earlier email on the Azurix water project, Azurix has
suspended OPIC's consideration of the project until either we are able to get
a more positive cable out of the US Embassy in Argentina or George moves on -
probably in late January.
 But the OPIC pullback together with the publicity about Rebecca's departure
has caused serious concern on the part of IDB which is now pulling back.  The
IDB has made it clear that they are concerned about Enron's intentions
regarding Azurix.  I have talked to Azurix about seeking some statement of
support from Enron so that we can address this issue head on.  You may well
be getting some communication from John Garrison on this issue.  If we can
get back on track Azurix may be able to get IDB Board approval this fall.
 Hope you are well.  thanks John


Hello - attached are copies of Schedule A (Enron MW) and Schedule B (Peoples
MW) to the MEH LLC Agreement.  Peoples has included a few projects they are
working on that don't have existing agreements.  Enron's list is much
shorter, 3 agreements to be exact.  The third agreement is a storage deal
with Nicor that would technically be a permitted activity under the trading
exclusion.  However, I believe we decided to include it, but we need to also
include the disclaimer language that inclusion on the Schedule does not imply
a restricted activity.  I have asked Hunter Shively, Central Desk Director,
if he knows of any other "middle-market" deals that we should include and he
said no.  I have also had our back office run the counterparties through our
trading systems to identify any term transactions that may currently be in
place.  Other than the Nicor deal listed, there were only standard trading
buy/sells with Nicor in the system.  Which brings up my last point, do we
need to disclose the existence of Master Purchase Agreements with a Covered
Gas Utility?  Trading uses these Agreements for standard physical buy/sells.
Anything more complicated would be done under a separate agreement.  The
Nicor deal was done under a separate agreement, not the existing Master.  If
my vote counts, I say let's not include them.  But, I defer to the experts.

Let me know your thoughts on the attached,

Thanks,

Gregg


Today, we are forming Enron Global Services (EGS) in order to more closely align our asset-based businesses.

This reorganization will allow EGS to focus our resources on opportunities that present the highest value to Enron.  It will also accomplish the following:  1) enhanced synergies among our assets and personnel, 2) more effective prioritization of business opportunities, and 3) better management of Enron's asset-based businesses throughout the world.

Enron Global Services' energy asset portfolio includes the North American pipeline businesses of Enron Transportation Services (ETS), including Northern Border; the international pipeline, power and distribution operations of Enron Global Assets & Services (EGAS); Portland General Electric; EOTT Energy Corp; Enron Wind; Azurix and Wessex Water.

Reporting to me as the heads of their respective business units are:
?	Jim Hughes, President & COO - EGS/International
?	Danny McCarty, Managing Director & CCO - ETS
?	Bill Cordes, President - Northern Border Partners
?	Peggy Fowler, President & CEO - Portland General Electric
?	John Garrison, President & CEO - Azurix
?	Dana Gibbs, President & COO - EOTT Energy Corp
?	Colin Skellett, CEO - Wessex Water
?	Adam Umanoff, President & CEO - Enron Wind

With the creation of EGS, we hope to enhance the efficient utilization of our commercial support services.  To accomplish this, EGS' staff and operational functions will be headed by:
?	Rod Hayslett, Managing Director & CFO
?	Rob Walls, Managing Director & General Counsel
?	Phil Lowry, Managing Director, Pipeline Operations and Engineering & Construction
?	Brian Stanley, President & CEO - EEOS
?	Steve Hotte, Vice President & CIO
?	John Ambler, Vice President, Communications & PR
?	Gary Smith, Vice President, Human Resources

In addition, Rob Walls will continue to perform his role as Deputy General Counsel for Enron reporting to Jim Derrick.

Phil Lowry will be responsible for domestic pipeline operations, technical services and engineering & construction, as well as, international pipeline technical services and engineering & construction.  Brian Stanley will be responsible for technical services and engineering & construction for international power and distribution facilities.

Below is an organization chart for Enron Global Services, which displays the changes described here.  We are confident this new organization will focus our talent and capital appropriately.  Please join me in supporting this management team as it strives to maximize Enron's return on its assets.

<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>