Hi Paul and Chris,
 Our friend Sampson at Power Gas still maintains that their local
production behind PNG has not been nominated for July yet, which was 7500
dth/month.  Did you guys do a deal for this gas too?  He usually nominates it
all on one day, so Clinton/CES needs to coordinate with him what day to do it
on (right now the gas is out there on his side on the 17th).  I know Heidi
nominated the Phillips gas baseloaded thru the month at 443/day, but I was not
sure about the Power, until I checked and sure enough the nom isn't out there
yet.
 I can get help nominating it from PNG to get it through CES' pool but I
want to make sure that's what we need to do.  Just give me the word and I will
call Sampson to get it done, but I will make it clear to him that this is the
last month he'll need to talk to me about it.  Thank you very much for the
clarifications!

Kara D. aka the lone ranger at CES


Start Date: 4/15/01; HourAhead hour: 24;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041524.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 24 / Preferred:  12.00 / Final:  11.98)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/15/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_LUCKY
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/15/01
  TRADING_SC: SETC
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 1
  DEAL_NO: 1
+++ Hour 24 - bad data from ISO.
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/15/01
  TRADING_SC: PGAE
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1


Attached are SUB's Data Responses to Seattle City Light's Data Requests.
These are sent electronically via e-mail due to potential problems with the
Discovery site.

 <<Data Response SL_SP_001.doc>>  <<Data Response SL_SP_002.doc>>  <<Data
Response SL_SP_003.doc>>  <<Data Response SL_SP_004.doc>>  <<Data Response
SL_SP_005.doc>>  <<Data Response SL_SP_006.doc>>

Jeff Nelson
Resource Projects Manager
Springfield Utility Board
Phone: (541) 744 - 3779
Fax: (541) 744 - 2263
e-mail: jeffn@subutil.com

 - Data Response SL_SP_001.doc
 - Data Response SL_SP_002.doc
 - Data Response SL_SP_003.doc
 - Data Response SL_SP_004.doc
 - Data Response SL_SP_005.doc
 - Data Response SL_SP_006.doc


I just want to give everyone my idea on how we will maintain DealBench to
catch up with LiveLink.

Tonight I will finish moving files from LiveLink to "O" drive for 6 peaker
projects. Once I move everything to "O" drive, I need to do following two
things to maintain DealBench.

Update files from "To be filed" folder since every file to go to "Due
Diligence" folder goes to "To be filed" folder first.
Jon: Please let me know whenever you move files from "Project Files" to "Due
Diligence" and whenever you delete files in "Due Diligence".

I think this process should allow me to make sure that DealBench files are
same as LiveLink files. Let me know if you find any hole in this process.
Thanks.

Jin


Here is a stab at draft legislative language for the core/noncore portion
(i.e., section 1) of the agreeement.  See you later today.

Best,
Jeff


Hey Buddy:

Hope your weekend was nice.  Tried to call, but I think your voicemail is
messed up out there today.  Checking in to see whether Hoecker said it or
not.  Any word?  Also, looks like we're on for Portland next
Tuesday/Wednesday.  Would definitely like to gather (phone call or something)
prior to the meeting so we (me, you, Rick, Richard) are clear on what our
goals are for the meeting and what the agenda needs to look like.  Finally, I
should have a draft of my "Tech Section" ready by tomorrow sometime.  That
was our deadline, correct?  Any other follow-info from last
Tuesday'Wednesday's meeting that I should be aware of?  Finally, you see
Harry's note?  Can you make a call to discuss the PG&E strategy on Wednesday?

Best,
Jeff


---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Breese/HOU/ECT on 05/07/2001 12:55
PM ---------------------------
From: David Fairley/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/07/2001 12:28 PM
To: Mark Breese/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mathew Gimble/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: RE: Responses to your questions on fuel oil for Fort Pierce facility

Mark --

(1)  We can use the MHI turbine specs that we have now.  The turbine team
will be telling everyone that final specs (on everything in the turbine
contract) will not be final for a while, so you have to use what is available
now.  In reality, not much will actually change.  Just use their current oil
spec sheet.

(2)  We have the opportunity to sell more than 200,00 gallons now, but we
need a price to work the extra deal.

(3)  If extra time for filling is desired (as in a put), then let me know the
parameters, and I will try to get it agreed to.  Starting to fill on time is
important, but if we take some extra time to finish, that might be okay.

(4)  Regarding the comment about not wanting too many trucks lined up and
causing traffic congestion, there is room in two spots near the plant to
"stage" a series of trucks.  If this info would be useful, let me know.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Breese, Mark
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 11:37 AM
To: Leach, Doug
Cc: Gimble, Mathew; Fairley, David; Boyt, Eric; McMichael, Ed; Weldon, V
Charles
Subject: Responses to your questions on fuel oil for Fort Pierce facility

Following are responses to your questions on the truck deliveries to the H.D.
King Power plant location (Fort Pierce).  We have answers to all questions
except the quality specifications of the fuel oil.  We expect an answer on
the quality specs tomorrow from our engineers (they are determining whether
the air permit or the turbine requirements will be the primary driver of our
quality specs).  We will forward them as soon as we receive these from the
engineers.

How long will it take to get a notional price on filling the 200,000 gallon
order?

Charlie and I will call later today to confirm your receipt of this email and
to review any additional questions.  Please call me at x36751 or Charlie at
x57229 with any questions.

Thanks

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------

1) Do the delivering trucks need to have their own pumps?

 The delivering trucks will require pumps.

2) What size lines are the trucks pumping into? 3"?

 The line is 3"

3) When connecting to our lines do the trucks need anything other than
standard fittings?

 Standard fittings may be used or 3 inch quick disconnect fittings.

4) Full spec sheet--especially sodium and potassium guarantees

The environmental specs are known but the specs on the turbine itself from
Mitsubishi (MHI) are not known.  We cannot determine the final specs unitl
the MHI requirements are known.

5) After the initial tank fill delivery availability 24 hours/day and
weekends?

 Someone is always on duty at plant so deliveries can technically be made on
a 24/7 basis.  The plant manager did say he would like to avoid a long line
of trucks out the plant in order to maintain good relationships with the
neighbors.

6) Tank fill and beyond--why not the full 1MM gallons?

 At this point we are only replacing the 200,000 gallons of oil we had Fort
Pierce burn in order to empty their old tank and allow us to clear that
location for our plant.  Additional oil may be purchased later (next year)
after development plans are further along.

7) Dyed/non dyed fuel issue--tax evaluating

 The plant requires non-Dyed fuel.

8) Identify previous diesel supplier to the plant

 Coastal was the previous supplier to the plant.

9) Design a fuel resupply plan including pre-purchase of fuel, call on
transportation, buy diesel calls for expected outage periods

  Such a plan appears to be premature at this point but we will review the
issues with you at a later date.

10) Buyer of record and credit issues with suppliers

  Fort Pierce Utilities Authority is the buyer of record.

11) Tank fill price--fixed or floating? (Platt's, NYMEX, OPIS, rack price)

  We are looking for a firm fixed price bid for filling the tank, unless you
would recommend otherwise.

12) Commercial start date of plan

  The tank will be finished and available for fill on 5/15/2001.

13) Any other issue to be discussed

  None that we are aware of.


Hi!

             I gave his resume to Scott Neal.  He is going to look at it and
pass it on to the appropriate people.  It looks like his backround includes
more origination experience than trading.

Take care!


Please find attached a Scope of Services document and a list of projects which have been implemented with current EES customers.  The Scope of Services document is designed to show the types of projects, operations and maintenance, and facilities management services that EESO typically offers to its customers based on their industry segment.  The projects and services offered are very similar across segments and customers, but their level of deployment varies significantly from segment to segment.

Certain segments were grouped together because the EESO offering would feature similar assets and services.
SIC Codes were given for each segment to represent the types of customers that comprise each segment.
The list of projects represents general categories from which more specific projects will be tailored to fit the clients needs.  This project list represents assets that have been approved by the DSM Desk and was queried from PCCS.
The Operations and Maintenance services can be applied to any energy-related assets and was compiled from term sheets and IAM.  Generally those activities have been limited to a few industrial outsourcing deals including Springs, Polaroid and recently Eli Lilly.
Facilities Management is usually outsourced via IPT or through the adoption of existing vendor contracts and can involve repair and maintenance for all assets.   Generally this type of activity has been focused on the retail/real estate segment.

Cheryl, pls set up a meeting with Harris, Clayton, Bouillion, Jones and Kaminski to discuss this and an action plan to develop a liability mitigation product.  I will re-present the original product concept at the meeting.  Would like to see the meeting take place late next week.

Thanks.

Richard


The hardest part of preparing the Long Descriptions is making sure all of the
terms used in th GTC's that need to be defined elsewhere are covered.  I'll
have to leave the final determination to the people who drafted the GTC's.  I
also have to point out I don't know much of anything about how bandwidth is
traded, but here are the comments I was able to come up with to the Long
Descriptions:

Bandwidth Units - This concept has been difficult for me - it's not entirely
clear to me where the definition of this comes from - is it the reference in
the box at the top of the relevant Annex?  If so, maybe we should add a line
something to the effect of 'Bandwidth Units shall mean DS-3 for this
Transaction.'  Or better yet you might consider a generic reference to the
relevant Annex that should apply which might let you delete the sentence
referring to the quality as well.

Does 'DSO' need to be defined somewhere?

The way the different Price definitions fit together has also eluded me -
there is a formula in the Long Description and a different formula in the
GTC.  Unless industry trading convention is to the contrary, the site makes
more intuitive sense when the volume quoted and the price quoted use the same
units.  If the volume is Bandwidth Units and the price is a per mile number
some counterparties (or perhaps more likely their lawyers) may be confused.
The GTC contains the defined term 'Unit Price' which is in $/Bandwidth Unit.
It seems to me that if we can quote the price as the Unit Price and the
volume as Bandwidth Units, we can ignore the number of DSO's per Bandwidth
Unit and the number of DSO miles for the transaction.

Since they won't change from one product to the next, the two sentences
beginning with 'Any party entering into a Transaction...' could be moved to
the GTC.

The term 'Contractual Currency' is not used int he GTC.  Can the
parenthetical reference come out?  (The EnronOnline people may care about
this more than I.)

If the numbers of miles and DSO's need to stay in the Long Descriptions, I
would suggest that you change the references to make it DSO's per Bandwidth
Unit (both where the number is introduced and in the price formula) and that
the unt of measure against which the price is quoted be 'per DSO mile per
month'.

Is the volume on the quotes page a monthly or total number?  This needs to be
clear from the Long Description.

So for example, if you follow all of my suggestions, you might end up with
something like this:

A US Bandwidth Transaction with Enron Broadband Services, L.P. (&EBS8)
pursuant to which the Seller shall sell and the Buyer shall buy the quantity
of Bandwidth Units submitted by Counterparty via the Website.  The price
shall be as submitted by the Counterparty via the Website.  Annex A-1 of the
General Terms and Conditions shall apply to this Transaction.
The term of the Transaction shall begin at 12:00 a.m. (EST) on the Effective
Date and continue to 11:59:59 p.m. (EST) on the Termination Date. The
Effective Date is <Start Date> and the Termination Date is <Termination
Date>.
The Transaction shall be for Bandwidth between the New York Market Pooling
Point (111 8th Avenue, Suite 1517, New York, NY 10011, NPA-NXX: 212-462,
CLLI: NYCMNY83H62) and the Los Angeles Market Pooling Point (530 W. 6th
Street, Suite 300, Los Angeles, CA 90014, NPA-NXX: 213-362, CLLI:
LSAJCAWZH04).
The price is quoted in US Dollars.
The unit of measure against which the price is quoted is one Bandwidth Unit
per month and the quantity shown shall be in number of Bandwidth Units per
month.

If quoting the price as a per Bandwidth Unit number doesn't work it would be
more like this:

A US Bandwidth Transaction with Enron Broadband Services, L.P. (&EBS8)
pursuant to which the Seller shall sell and the Buyer shall buy the quantity
of Bandwidth Units submitted by Counterparty via the Website. The number of
DSO,s per Bandwidth Unit is 672. The price shall be as submitted by the
Counterparty via the Website.  Annex A-1 of the General Terms and Conditions
will apply to this Transaction.
The term of the Transaction shall begin at 12:00 a.m. (EST) on the Effective
Date and continue to 11:59:59 p.m. (EST) on the Termination Date. The
Effective Date is <Start Date> and the Termination Date is <Termination
Date>.
The Transaction shall be for Bandwidth between the New York Market Pooling
Point (111 8th Avenue, Suite 1517, New York, NY 10011, NPA-NXX: 212-462,
CLLI: NYCMNY83H62) and the Los Angeles Market Pooling Point (530 W. 6th
Street, Suite 300, Los Angeles, CA 90014, NPA-NXX: 213-362, CLLI:
LSAJCAWZH04), for a total of 2,446 DSO miles.
The price is quoted in US Dollars.
The unit of measure against which the price is quoted is one DS0 mile per
month and the quantity shown shall be in number of Bandwidth Units per month.
Therefore, the Contract Price will be calculated as follows: price x the
number of DS0,s per Bandwidth Unit x the number of DS0 miles x the number of
Bandwidth Units.

Please let me know if you have any questions - I will go ahead and approve
the product in the system so you can proceed without me if necessary.

Mark

Leonardo Pacheco@ENRON
04/27/2000 01:38 PM
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, James Ginty/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Taffy Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Bandwidth Products On EnronOnline. (Revised)

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Leonardo Pacheco/Corp/Enron on 04/27/2000
12:36 PM ---------------------------

Leonardo Pacheco
04/27/2000 01:07 PM
To: Jay Hawthorn/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Tom
Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rudi Zipter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron, Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia
Harkness/Enron Communications@Enron Communications

Subject: Bandwidth Products On EnronOnline. (Revised)

Please note that we have added another product type (bringing the total
number to three)!.
We have built three new Products Types called US Bandwidth DS3 Physical
Forward, US Bandwidth OC3 Physical Forward, and US Bandwidth OC3c Physical
Forward. Please go into DataManager and approve these Product Types (look at
attached Document for long descriptions).  We are going life on the 1st of
May.  If you need help with the approval process contact Dale Neuner (ext.
39746) or myself (ext. 39938). Please Do Not Reject the Product Type. If you
have questions or changes to the Product Type please contact me at your
convenience.

Thank you very much for your co-operation!

Leonardo Pacheco
ext. 39938


Assuming that our bid's stay in the range discussed previously, what are we going to do?

I am not going to hard trade the buyers at this point until we know for sure Suncor is there..

So, can you pls advise.

I would suggest we get Suncor to give you a "Stand Still" for the rest of this week which includes a firm number ( or better ) that they will sell capacity for. By the way, this number needs to be close to zero as there is not much left over.

Current economics.... approx $400,000 Bid on the table, plus ENA holds option Apr 02 - oct 02 to put capacity to buyer.  Under this structre Suncor keeps capacity until Apr. 02. There are no liquids conversations being conducted at this time and pending structure may not be.

None of the financial markets support premium payments ( for any term ).

Give me a call.

BT


Ginger & Cheryl,

I will attend.

Vince Kaminski

P.S. Shirley, please put it on my schedule.

	From:  Ginger B Gamble                           06/08/2000 06:20 PM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Summer Associate Mentor

The Summer Associate Program is a critical component of our recruiting
efforts.  We appreciate you acting as a Mentor  for the following Summer
Associate.

Vince,

A reception to introduce you to the Summer Associates is scheduled for June
22nd.  The reception will be held from 6:00 PM until 7:30 PM at Sierra's
Grill located at 4704 Montrose (713-942-7757).  We have also provided the
Summer Associate with your name and phone number; however, we encourage you
to contact Guiseppe prior to the reception if possible.

Please RSVP your attendance to Cheryl Kuehl at x39804 or by email.

Thank you

Charlene Jackson


There are 2 sheets in the following attachment that contain Enron transactional data for the Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) and Dynegy Direct, labeled as follows:
"Enron Activity - Dynegy Direct"
"Enron Activity - ICE"

Note: Total activity for Dynegy Direct is not available, therefore Enron's Percentage can not be calculated.

Let me know if you have any questions or comments.

Adam Johnson
EnronOnline
713-345-4877

<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>


- Book2.xls


---------------------- Forwarded by Gavin Dillingham/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
09/01/2000 01:40 PM ---------------------------

Jeff Dasovich@EES
09/01/2000 01:30 PM
To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@ENRON
cc: Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Sandra McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L
Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Gavin
Dillingham/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON, Harry
Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES

Subject: Re: California Lawmakers Vote to Limit Power Costs - WSJ

Here are some more prices.  Many thanks to Roger Yang.

Steven J Kean@ENRON
09/01/2000 08:27 AM
Sent by: Steven J Kean@ENRON
To: Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Sandra
McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES
cc: Gavin Dillingham/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Harry
Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: California Lawmakers Vote to Limit Power Costs - WSJ

Look at this.  Baum finally speaks up  -- way too late.
Can somebody tell me what SDG&E's energy rate was pre-dereg?
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 09/01/2000
08:24 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Ann M Schmidt                           09/01/2000 07:57 AM

To: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Meredith Philipp/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: California Lawmakers Vote to Limit Power Costs - WSJ

F.Y.I.

  California Lawmakers Vote to Limit Power Costs
  By Rebecca Smith

  09/01/2000
  The Wall Street Journal
  Page A4
  (Copyright (c) 2000, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

  California lawmakers voted to extend modest relief to San Diego residents
burdened with
  high electricity bills and set the groundwork for faster construction of
badly needed power
  plants. They stopped short, however, of passing legislation that would roll
back retail power
  rates to levels seen prior to deregulation .

  Late Wednesday, lawmakers sent a bill to Gov. Gray Davis that limits to 6.5
cents per
  kilowatt hour the amount that small customers of San Diego Gas & Electric
Co. can be
  charged. The utility is allowed to add power-delivery and other reasonable
costs to that
  commodity price.

  The price, equivalent to a bulk power cost of $65 per megawatt hour, is far
higher than the
  average price of power for 27 of the 31 months in which California's market
has been
  deregulated. But in June and July, the average price of power obtained by
the utility from a
  state-sanctioned energy auction rose to 12 cents and 10.5 cents,
respectively, compared
  with the 2.3 cents and 2.8 cents charged in those months a year earlier.

  Passed directly through to customers,the resulting bills sparked a near
mutiny. The
  rate-cap measure applies to residential and small commercial customers, as
well as to
  schools and hospitals.

  In addition to the rate cap, which can be adjusted upward or downward by
the California
  Public Utilities Commission until December 2002, the legislature earmarked
$150 million of
  general-fund revenue, which can be used to subsidize San Diego power costs
if they greatly
  exceed the 6.5-cents-per-kilowatt-hour rate. For now, the utility would be
expected to make
  up any difference between revenue collected and the actual cost.

  Steve Baum, chairman of Sempra Energy, parent of San Diego Gas & Electric
Co., said the
  rate-cap measure is "deeply flawed" because it limits the amount prices can
rise but sets
  no floor. That means any shortfall could grow -- without a mechanism for
customers to pay
  it down -- until the end of the rate-cap period, which could last until
December 2002 or
  December 2003.

  Mr. Baum said Sempra stands to suffer an undercollection of perhaps $664
million, provided
  future prices approximate the New York Mercantile Exchange forward prices
through
  December 2002. "It's irreparably damaging to Sempra," he said because it
"creates
  tremendous uncertainty" that makes it hard for the San Diego energy company
to finance
  new projects such as a new transmission line.

  The legislature also appeared likely to approve a bill speeding up the
permit process for the
  construction of new power plants, in part by beefing up staffs of
regulatory agencies that
  review the plans.

  Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Here is the term sheet on the 5 year toll for the Midway project.

Fred
---------------------- Forwarded by Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT on 05/02/2001 09:05 AM
---------------------------

Nick Hiemstra
04/30/2001 09:06 AM
To: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Midway Term Sheet

Fred,

I went ahead and took the pricing out for now.  As Edith told you, we are
verifying our models at this time.


Cajun Chef-can only get it here.  Too bad.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"John Maliszewski" <jmalisz@qwest.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, November 15, 2001 1:33 PM
To:	Tholt, Jane M.
Subject:	Re: Thanksgiving

You mean the stuff you buy or the gas that comes out of my butt after I make chili.  Speaking of chili, what does Joe put in his to spice it up.

Jane.M.Tholt@enron.com wrote:

> All the gas stocks getting hammered.  Natural gas is bursting at the seams.
> Your bill should go way down
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>    From:   "John Maliszewski" <jmalisz@qwest.com>@ENRON
>    Sent:   Thursday, November 15, 2001 12:19 PM
>    To:     Tholt, Jane M.
>    Subject:  Thanksgiving
>
>    I ordered the pies for our big Thanksgiving day feast at Jeanies.  Wish
>    you could be there.  Dad is bringing the beer, he said one  12 pack
>    would do, I told him to bring a case, just in case someone wants more
>    that one can. I know that Joan is not coming to dinner.  Should we
>    invite her to Christmas or wait for her to call.    If you ever talk to
>    her, you may want to mention that her father is still alive and lives in
>    the same house that she was raised in.  I hope she comes for Christmas.
>    If she doesn't, I doubt that I will ever invite to anything again.  But
>    that is that fucking Links "better that everybody else"attitude.   I
>    might just turn that sideways and stick it up his German ass.  Hey our
>    stock is going up, how bout yours?
>
> **********************************************************************
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
> **********************************************************************


Good Morning/Afternoon/Evening;

I started working in June 22 to test path cut capabilities.  I was able to save a cut path.

Please make sure that Bill Williams III and Whomever he designates has access to Enpower TestP so that I can walk them through the app when it is ready. Right now it looks like Mark Guzman and Kate Symes will be the voice of West Real time.

A Real Time Question:
When Enpower is taken down for maintenance, as it sometimes is at night, will this application still function?  If not, we need to find a way for the real time crew to be able to access this information when Enpower is being maintained.

Re-Running June 20th as a completely new day: This entire test was done in local Enpower

PreSchedule Workspace:

Running Build Route Report:
	Criteria Selection-unable to select criteria for build route, got "List index out of bounds (4)" error *needs fix

Error Checking - took 1:29, produced a line by line error sheet that is printable, *accepted
	BUT routing errors for lines 19-223 in the COB sheet produced a routing error that just states "ERROR:" no reason.  We need to know why an error is shown(was 	run after all routes were deleted) *needs fix

Uploading to the Path Confirm Area:*accepted Mid C-1:53   Rockies-0:22    Palo 1:11  COB 0:49 (Row 69 Generated a General SQL error message)

Daily Summary Function

Routing:*accepted Mid C-13:27   Rockies-2:23   Palo 7:56  COB 5:12

Path Confirmation:

Speed is very much an issue here,  I had Mark Guzman sit with me while I cut a path and when I confirmed a group of paths. The confirmation of 5 paths as a group took 70 seconds from the time I entered the name and hit the "ok" button until the confriming was completed. This is too long, we need this to be 20-30 seconds max. Currently, this process takes about 10 seconds in lotus.

Cutting a path went fast enough until I closed the screen to go back to the confirmation report. This also took over a minute.  This is another 10 second process in lotus.

One little housekeeping thing,  can we move the delete button away from the confrim button?  Perhaps on the other side of the exit button?  This will save us mucho headaches later. OR make the dialog box look more like a warning that a record has been selected for deletion?

Real Time Discussion:

Where are we on this?  I heard initial rumblings, but nothing lately.


=================================================================
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES' CLICK 'N SAVE E-MAIL UPDATE
January 1, 2002
=================================================================

THE FIRST DAY OF 2002!

Horns are blowing.
We're making a toast.

To the greatest Customers, Coast to Coast:

Here's to a New Year of LUV
That comes from the heart
We wish you prosperity,
on this brand new start.

Happy New Year!

=================================================================
IMPORTANT TRAVEL INFORMATION
=================================================================

For updated travel information, please visit:
http://www.southwest.com/travel_center/travelAdvisory.html

=================================================================
THIS WEEK'S SPECIALS
=================================================================
1. southwest.com Specials for purchase through January 3, 2002
2. Subscriber Information

=================================================================
CLICK 'N SAVE SPECIALS
=================================================================
Albany, NY
 $77 one-way, to/from Jacksonville, FL
 $68 one-way, to/from Louisville, KY

Albuquerque, NM
 $99 one-way, to/from Kansas City, MO
 $41 one-way, to/from Tucson, AZ

Amarillo, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
 $63 one-way, to/from San Antonio, TX

Austin, TX
 $42 one-way, to/from Midland/Odessa, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Phoenix, AZ

Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
 $52 one-way, to/from Chicago Midway, IL
 $35 one-way, to/from Cleveland, OH

Birmingham, AL
 $62 one-way, to/from Chicago Midway, IL
 $54 one-way, to/from St. Louis, MO

Boise, ID
 $37 one-way, to/from Reno/Tahoe, NV
 $34 one-way, to/from Spokane, WA

Buffalo/Niagara Falls, NY
 $48 one-way, to/from Norfolk, VA/Southern Virginia
 $70 one-way, to/from Tampa Bay, FL

Burbank, CA
 $35 one-way, to/from Las Vegas, NV
 $99 one-way, to/from Portland, OR

Chicago Midway, IL
 $52 one-way, to/from Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
 $62 one-way, to/from Birmingham, AL

Cleveland, OH
 $35 one-way, to/from Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
 $99 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA

Columbus, OH
 $99 one-way, to/from Ft. Lauderdale/Hollywood, FL
 $64 one-way, to/from Tampa Bay, FL

Corpus Christi, TX
 $48 one-way, to/from Dallas Love Field, TX
 $65 one-way, to/from Little Rock, AR

Dallas Love Field, TX
 $48 one-way, to/from Corpus Christi, TX
 $36 one-way, to/from Tulsa, OK

Detroit, MI
 $63 one-way, to/from Omaha, NE
 $52 one-way, to/from Raleigh-Durham, NC

El Paso, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Houston Bush Intercontinental, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Houston Hobby, TX
 $79 one-way, to/from Los Angeles, CA

Ft. Lauderdale/Hollywood, FL
 $99 one-way, to/from Columbus, OH
 $34 one-way, to/from Orlando, FL

Harlingen/South Padre Island, TX
 $89 one-way, to/from Oklahoma City, OK
 $38 one-way, to/from San Antonio, TX

Hartford, CT/Springfield, MA
 $99 one-way, to/from Jackson, MS
 $50 one-way, to/from Raleigh-Durham, NC

Houston Bush Intercontinental, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from El Paso, TX
 $55 one-way, to/from Little Rock, AR
 $55 one-way, to/from Oklahoma City, OK

Houston Hobby, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from El Paso, TX
 $55 one-way, to/from Little Rock, AR
 $55 one-way, to/from Oklahoma City, OK

Indianapolis, IN
 $99 one-way, to/from Manchester, NH
 $99 one-way, to/from Providence, RI

Jackson, MS
 $99 one-way, to/from Hartford, CT/Springfield, MA
 $99 one-way, to/from Phoenix, AZ

Jacksonville, FL
 $77 one-way, to/from Albany, NY
 $40 one-way, to/from Norfolk, VA/Southern Virginia

Kansas City, MO
 $99 one-way, to/from Albuquerque, NM
 $99 one-way, to/from Midland/Odessa, TX

Las Vegas, NV
 $35 one-way, to/from Burbank, CA
 $48 one-way, to/from Oakland, CA
 $36 one-way, to/from Phoenix, AZ
 $40 one-way, to/from San Diego, CA

Little Rock, AR
 $65 one-way, to/from Corpus Christi, TX
 $55 one-way, to/from Houston Bush Intercontinental, TX
 $55 one-way, to/from Houston Hobby, TX

Long Island/Islip, NY
 $34 one-way, to/from Providence, RI
 $79 one-way, to/from West Palm Beach, FL

Los Angeles, CA
 $79 one-way, to/from El Paso, TX
 $46 one-way, to/from Reno/Tahoe, NV
 $99 one-way, to/from Seattle/Tacoma, WA

Louisville, KY
 $68 one-way, to/from Albany, NY
 $69 one-way, to/from Orlando, FL

Lubbock, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from St. Louis, MO
 $61 one-way, to/from Tulsa, OK

Manchester, NH
 $99 one-way, to/from Indianapolis, IN
 $89 one-way, to/from Nashville, TN

Midland/Odessa, TX
 $42 one-way, to/from Austin, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Kansas City, MO

Nashville, TN
 $89 one-way, to/from Manchester, NH
 $66 one-way, to/from West Palm Beach, FL

New Orleans, LA
 $99 one-way, to/from Amarillo, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Cleveland, OH

Norfolk, VA/Southern Virginia
 $48 one-way, to/from Buffalo/Niagara Falls, NY
 $40 one-way, to/from Jacksonville, FL

Oakland, CA
 $48 one-way, to/from Las Vegas, NV
 $49 one-way, to/from Seattle/Tacoma, WA

Oklahoma City, OK
 $89 one-way, to/from Harlingen/South Padre Island, TX
 $55 one-way, to/from Houston Bush Intercontinental, TX
 $55 one-way, to/from Houston Hobby, TX

Omaha, NE
 $63 one-way, to/from Detroit, MI
 $99 one-way, to/from Sacramento, CA

Ontario, CA
 $34 one-way, to/from Phoenix, AZ
 $38 one-way, to/from San Jose, CA

Orlando, FL
 $34 one-way, to/from Ft. Lauderdale/Hollywood, FL
 $69 one-way, to/from Louisville, KY

Phoenix, AZ
 $99 one-way, to/from Austin, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Jackson, MS
 $36 one-way, to/from Las Vegas, NV
 $34 one-way, to/from Ontario, CA

Portland, OR
 $99 one-way, to/from Burbank, CA
 $94 one-way, to/from Tucson, AZ

Providence, RI
 $99 one-way, to/from Indianapolis, IN
 $34 one-way, to/from Long Island/Islip, NY

Raleigh-Durham, NC
 $52 one-way, to/from Detroit, MI
 $50 one-way, to/from Hartford, CT/Springfield, MA

Reno/Tahoe, NV
 $37 one-way, to/from Boise, ID
 $46 one-way, to/from Los Angeles, CA

Sacramento, CA
 $99 one-way, to/from Omaha, NE
 $42 one-way, to/from San Diego, CA

Salt Lake City, UT
 $50 one-way, to/from San Jose, CA
 $49 one-way, to/from Spokane, WA

San Antonio, TX
 $63 one-way, to/from Amarillo, TX
 $38 one-way, to/from Harlingen/South Padre Island, TX

San Diego, CA
 $40 one-way, to/from Las Vegas, NV
 $42 one-way, to/from Sacramento, CA

San Jose, CA
 $38 one-way, to/from Ontario, CA
 $50 one-way, to/from Salt Lake City, UT

Seattle/Tacoma, WA
 $99 one-way, to/from Los Angeles, CA
 $49 one-way, to/from Oakland, CA

Spokane, WA
 $34 one-way, to/from Boise, ID
 $49 one-way, to/from Salt Lake City, UT

St. Louis, MO
 $54 one-way, to/from Birmingham, AL
 $99 one-way, to/from Lubbock, TX

Tampa Bay, FL
 $70 one-way, to/from Buffalo/Niagara Falls, NY
 $64 one-way, to/from Columbus, OH

Tucson, AZ
 $41 one-way, to/from Albuquerque, NM
 $94 one-way, to/from Portland, OR

Tulsa, OK
 $36 one-way, to/from Dallas Love Field, TX
 $61 one-way, to/from Lubbock, TX

West Palm Beach, FL
 $79 one-way, to/from Long Island/Islip, NY
 $66 one-way, to/from Nashville, TN

=================================================================
IMPORTANT DETAILS
=================================================================
*Available only on southwest.com.
*21-day advance purchase required.
*Available on published, scheduled service.
*Fares shown are one-way and do not include federal
 excise tax of up to $3.00 for each flight segment.
 (a segment is defined as a takeoff and landing)
*Fares do not include airport-assessed passenger
 facility charges (PFC) of up to $9 one-way.
*Fares do not include security fee.
*Fares are nonrefundable, but (except for tickets
 purchased through our Group Tickets Program)
 may be applied toward future travel on Southwest Airlines.
*Travel January 21, 2002 through end of schedule,
 except May 24, and 27, 2002.
*Purchase through January 3, 2002,  midnight Pacific Time.
*Fares are available one-way or can be combined
 with other fare types.  Most restrictive rules of combined
 fares will apply.
*Penalty applies to any changes made after purchasing
 Southwest Internet Specials.

For more details, please visit us at:
http://www.southwest.com/jp/hotfares2.shtml?src=e010102

=================================================================
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
=================================================================
Additional information you need to know about all of our
air fare specials:

*Changes to any portion of the reservation
 (flight, dates, cities, and/or names of passengers),
 once purchased, will result in the cancellation of
 the ENTIRE reservation and rebooking at the lowest
 fare available which could result in a fare increase.
*Southwest specials are nonchangeable
 and nonrefundable.
*Ticketless Travel may be purchased online using
 either a credit card or by utilizing funds from a
 previously unused or cancelled Ticketless
 Travel reservation(s).  Funds from up to four cancelled
 or unused Ticketless Travel reservation records can
 be combined to purchase a new Ticketless Travel
 reservation record.  Southwest Airlines travel credit
 (e.g., travel voucher, gift certificate, discount coupon)
 may not be used as forms of payment for
 Ticketless Travel Online.
*Unused funds may be applied toward future travel on
 Southwest Airlines within one year of the original purchase date.
*Seats are limited and won't be available on some
 flights that operate during very busy travel times
 and holiday periods such as Presidents Day and Memorial Day.
*Standby travel requires an upgrade to the
 full unrestricted fare.

=================================================================
SUBSCRIBER INFORMATION
=================================================================
Please pass this great news on to your friends.
To subscribe to Southwest Airlines Click 'n Save E-mail
Updates, visit:
http://www.southwest.com/email/

Remember, if you change your Internet service provider,
you will need to unsubscribe and resubscribe in order
to continue receiving Click 'n Save E-mail Updates.
For administration on your e-mail subscription, please visit:
http://www.southwest.com/email/emailUnsubscribe.html

=================================================================
You may retrieve and print a copy of your Southwest
Airlines Ticketless Travel at:
http://www.southwest.com/travel_center/retrieveItinerary.html

Questions about your flight arrival or departure time?
Please visit us at:
http://www.southwest.com/cgi-bin/selectFlight

=================================================================

This is a post only mailing from Southwest Airlines.
Please do not attempt to respond to this message.

Copyright 2002 Southwest Airlines Co. All Rights Reserved.

---
You are currently subscribed to special-offers as: dperlin@enron.com
You can unsubscribe anytime at http://www.southwest.com/email/


Attached please find attached confirmation for 01/12/02 through 01/14/02.  Yes, Linda, I am finished!

TK


I have been told today that these folks will have to do all of our scheduling as of Monday, they are being trained today but will have to have working logins patterned after Donald Robinson by the end of business today.

Serena Bishop ( I do not know what she has access to, she was the California scheduler)
Mike Purcell (already has access to some things, but please check his access)

If this cannot be done, please call Murray O'Neil asap.  His Cell is 503-702-9846


Hi Jay:
I can only begin to imagine how stressed things must be for you right now. Jerril and I have our fingers crossed that things work out OK for you during the transition. Hopefully, the people at Dynegy will recognize what a smart, honest and harworking guy you are and reward you appropriately.

If you ever want to vent, let me know. Sometimes big sisters aren't always bossy and can even be helpful.
Love,
Meg

Meg Reitmeyer and Jerril Burnette
megandjerril@earthlink.net


Regarding your memo below, following is a status on those items:
1, 2:  The pricing and consistency in pricing for handling intra-month
changes does appear to be an issue.  Since the contract didn't spell out in
detail location by location pricing (and I think intentionally so), we
believe the best way to handle this for April forward is to agree monthly
(during bid week) of the process and pricing for each location.  I know Chris
Germany has prepared a proposal that I think he has discussed (generally, not
specific numbers) with Brian, Doug and Charlie.  I will ask that he forward
this proposal TODAY and finalize the process for April ASAP.  Let me know if
you do not think a monthly process of agreeing to the changes is sufficient.

3.  Local production - unfortunately I think we have opened a can of worms
here.   Here is what is happening:  Your people are nominating this
production (we are not even set up to do behind the citygate nominations),
but the contracts were assigned to us in the Wholesale transaction.  That
means they were valued by us and put into our system at a value.   We are
reviewing this detail now and are finding quite a few discrepancies between
the prices that were listed on the Wholesale Deal List and the actual
contract prices with the producers.  So, this is one issue we will have to
address as indemnification items.  That's problem one.  Problem two is that I
am assuming you all would like this production back since you are doing all
the nominations.  We need to work on a solution for doing this (if that is
what you want).  For Jan, Feb & Mar, however, it appears that we will be the
ones paying the producers, so we will need to get volume information from
your schedulers in order to get this billed and payed for properly.   I'll
follow up with more information on this in the next couple of days.

4.  Monthly invoices - regarding the pipeline demand charges, it sounds like
Chris has been trying to verify all the charges before he sends copies of the
pipeline invoices on to you.  Maybe we should change this process to one
where he sends them to you as soon as he gets them instead of waiting on his
confirmation and review of all the charges.  This means you may see quite a
bit of incorrect data, but at least you'll have something.  Let us know what
you would prefer.  Regarding the January invoice specifically, I do know that
the Columbia Gulf and Columbia Gas packet of pipeline invoices was mailed to
your office yesterday, March 29.  Chris will get all remaining demand charge
statements to your office by Wednesday, April 5, and all corrections he is
aware of as of this date by Friday, April 7.  I apologize for the delay.

5.  Swap confirmations - I spoke with Jeff Hodge and he believes he has a
packet of all the confirms--he is in Calgary today and will be back on
Monday.  Is that soon enough for this to be sent to you?  If not, please
advise and I'll see if his assistant can search for this data.

Thanks for clarifying the storage proxy schedule with the remaining inventory
balances.

mflewellyn@columbiaenergygroup.com on 03/28/2000 12:43:55 PM
To: " - *colleen.sullivan@enron.com" <colleen.sullivan@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: storage clarification & issues

I forgot the storage attachment ...
---------------------- Forwarded by Melissa Flewellyn/CES/ColumbiaGas on
03/28/2000 01:42 PM ---------------------------

Melissa Flewellyn
03/28/2000 01:32 PM

To: colleen.sullivan@enron.com@internet
cc:
Subject: storage clarification & issues

Colleen,

Attached is an updated storage proxy schedule for COH and AGL showing what our
balance will be as of April 1, 2000.  As always, if you have any questions,
please let me know.  I'm sending a copy of the document to Denny Pick for
signature and will then send it to Jeff Hodge to get signature from Enron.

Aside from the storage issue, there are several other items that we need to
discuss.  Below is a brief description of each.  Please let me know how you
think we could best deal with these - whether it's via phone call or having an
in-person meeting down in your office.

1.  Pricing - I left you a message about this last week.  According to Chris
Germany, all changes to volumes after first-of-the-month must me negotiated.
In the contract, however, it specifically refers to pricing intra-month using
gas daily OR negotiated pricing depending on the timing of the change.

2.  Consistency - During our discussions with Chris, it sounds as though some
pipes are being handled differently than others again as it relates to
intra-month changes.  I'd just like to make sure that we agree on the pricing
mechanism and then apply it consistently.

3.  Local production - Apparently there was local production that John Singer
purchased specifically to back Retail customers, and this production was not
removed from the Wholesale book prior to the sale.  We need to discuss how to
handle this production.

4.  Monthly invoices - We still haven't seen the complete January 2000
invoice.  As I understand it, the demand charges have not all been sent over,
and several items that need to be changed haven't yet been changed.  Also,
Brian Perrone and Charlie Dalphon have indicated that they have requested
back-up documentation on the demand charges, but we still haven't received
anything.

5.  Swap confirmations - For all of the swaps that Clay Deaton put in place
with Enron to keep Retail's existing hedge positions in tact, I still do not
have executed copies of all of the confirmation agreements.  Rich Contos and I
have both called several people about getting a complete set of copies, but we
can't seem to find the right person over there.

Whenever you have time to discuss these, please let me know.

Thanks,

Melissa

 - storage proxy.xls


Calender.

 -----Original Appointment-----
From: 	Bryant, Rachel   On Behalf Of Don Black/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, July 27, 2001 11:50 AM
To:	Don Black/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON; Presto, Kevin M.; Belden, Tim; Richter, Jeff; Herndon, Rogers; Dayao, Anthony; Beck, Sally
Cc:	Valdez, Christina; Coleman, Debra; Finnels-Neal, La Donna; Palma, Viviana
Subject:	to: 11am CT Settlements EB 3308
When:	Wednesday, August 01, 2001 10:00 AM-11:00 AM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where:

John Lavorato
Kevin M Presto
 Tim Belden
Jeff Richter
Rogers Herndon
Anthony Dayao
Sally Beck
Rogers Herndon
Jeff Richter


********PLEASE DO NOT RESPOND TO THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE************

********************************************************************
    AIR CANADA'S EXTENDED WEBSAVER(TM)CONTINUES THROUGH JANUARY
********************************************************************

It's time to stretch your weekends! Extended Websaver continues
through January. You can enjoy our low Websaver fares for longer
stays. Depart as early as Thursday and stay as late as the following
Wednesday. That's up to 7 days! And now you can enjoy Websaver fares
for about twice as many destinations!

Air Canada's WEBSAVER* specials are only valid for travel originating
in Canada and/or the United States. To enjoy WEBSAVER specials,
flights must be booked online or with your Travel Agent. For
Air Canada WEBSAVER* bookings, you can now go on-line at:

https://w4.aircanada.ca/aeroplan/mileageE.html

Also, to stay informed of any changes to your flight status, register
a request for a flight notification at:

http://www.aircanada.ca/services/mobile/notification.html
and automatically receive alerts through your text enabled
phone/pager or email address.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Air Canada Vacations offers great package deals to its newest
destination, Cuba. Please click on the following link to view our
latest specials:

http://www.aircanadavacations.com/ACV/start.htm

---------------------------------------------------------------------
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:

 http://www.aircanada.ca/websaver/direct.html
_____________________________________________________________________

**********TAKE ADVANTAGE OF OUR INTERNATIONAL SPECIALS***************
_____________________________________________________________________

Fare basis code:    LWEBSAVE
Sale Period :       January 30, 2002 to February 2, 2002
Travel Period :     Outbound: permitted February 5, 2002 through
                    February 5, 2002 inclusive
                    Inbound: permitted February 12, 2002 through
                    February 12, 2002 inclusive
Routing :           Valid on AC nonstop/direct flights only.
Reservations and Ticketing : Reservations are required 1 day prior
                             to departure.
                             Ticketing must be completed within 1 day
                             after reservations are made or at least
                             1 day prior to departure, whichever is
                             earlier.
Maximum Stay :      All travel must be complete by February 12, 2002
Combinations :      Not Permitted
Stopovers/Rerouting/Rebooking :   Not Permitted
Children/Seniors Discount : Not Applicable
Infant Discount :   90%, provided infant not occupying a seat.
Cancellations :     Non - Refundable

*International fares are only valid for travel originating in Canada

- From/Within CANADA in (CAN $)     BASE     TAX    TOTAL    COUPON#
                                          SURCHARGES

Montreal        - Port-au-Prince   449.00    6.00   455.00  DL-56NPRG

_____________________________________________________________________

**********TAKE ADVANTAGE OF OUR INTERNATIONAL SPECIALS***************
_____________________________________________________________________

Fare basis code:    LWEBSAVE
Sale Period :       January 30, 2002 to February 2, 2002
Travel Period :     Outbound: permitted January 31, 2002 through
                    February 2, 2002 inclusive
                    Inbound: permitted February 3, 2002 through
                    February 4, 2002 inclusive
Routing :           Valid on AC nonstop/direct flights only.
Reservations and Ticketing : Reservations are required 1 day prior
                             to departure.
                             Ticketing must be completed within 1 day
                             after reservations are made or at least
                             1 day prior to departure, whichever is
                             earlier.
Maximum Stay :      All travel must be complete by February 4, 2002
Combinations :      Not Permitted
Stopovers/Rerouting/Rebooking :   Not Permitted
Children/Seniors Discount : Not Applicable
Infant Discount :   90%, provided infant not occupying a seat.
Cancellations :     Non - Refundable

*International fares are only valid for travel originating in Canada

- From/Within CANADA in (CAN $)     BASE     TAX    TOTAL    COUPON#
                                          SURCHARGES

Toronto         - Bermuda          339.00   63.80   402.80  DL-56NTUB

_____________________________________________________________________

**********TAKE ADVANTAGE OF OUR INTERNATIONAL SPECIALS***************
_____________________________________________________________________

Fare basis code:    LWEBSAVE
Sale Period :       January 30, 2002 to February 2, 2002
Travel Period :     Outbound: permitted January 31, 2002 through
                    February 1, 2002 inclusive
                    Inbound: permitted February 7, 2002 through
                    February 8, 2002 inclusive
Routing :           Valid on AC nonstop/direct flights only.
Reservations and Ticketing : Reservations are required 1 day prior
                             to departure.
                             Ticketing must be completed within 1 day
                             after reservations are made or at least
                             1 day prior to departure, whichever is
                             earlier.
Maximum Stay :      All travel must be complete by February 8, 2002
Combinations :      Not Permitted
Stopovers/Rerouting/Rebooking :   Not Permitted
Children/Seniors Discount : Not Applicable
Infant Discount :   90%, provided infant not occupying a seat.
Cancellations :     Non - Refundable

*International fares are only valid for travel originating in Canada

- From/Within CANADA in (CAN $)     BASE     TAX    TOTAL    COUPON#
                                          SURCHARGES

Toronto         - Kingston         509.00   60.90   569.90  DL-56NPRJ

_____________________________________________________________________

*****************TAKE ADVANTAGE OF OUR WEEKEND FARES*****************
************************HOTELS & CAR RENTALS*************************
_____________________________________________________________________

Air Canada's WEBSAVER* and Partners offer great discounts for
last minute travel to selected destinations each week. The fares
listed are valid for new reservations only and for travel this
weekend only; you must depart on Thursday January 31, 2002, Friday
February 01, 2002 or on Saturday February 02, 2002 returning
anytime the following Monday February 04, 2002, Tuesday
February 05, 2002 or Wednesday February 06, 2002.

Please note that not all flights are available for Friday
departures.

For Air Canada WEBSAVER* bookings, you can now book on-line at:

https://w4.aircanada.ca/aeroplan/mileageE.html or call your
Travel Agent between Wednesday and Friday.

If you are booking through your Travel Agent, please be sure to
give them the coupon number, and mention Air Canada's WEBSAVER*
fares.

For hotels and car rentals please follow the instructions listed
below with each respective offer.

*****  TRAVEL FARES ARE QUOTED AS ROUND-TRIP AND MAY ORIGINATE  *****
*********      IN EITHER CITY OF THE FOLLOWING PAIRS     ************

For GENERAL TERMS & CONDITIONS regarding Air Canada's WEBSAVER,
Partner Hotels and Car Rentals, please click the address below:

http://www.aircanada.ca/websaver/conditions.html

- From/Within CANADA in (CAN $)     BASE     TAX    TOTAL    COUPON#
                                          SURCHARGES

Abbotsford      - Calgary          138.00   66.37   204.37  GP-56LSD3
Baie-Comeau     - Montreal         179.00   74.06   253.06  GP-56LSGA
Calgary         - Cranbrook         99.00   63.64   162.64  GP-56LSDE
Calgary         - Grande Prairie   199.00   70.64   269.64  GP-56LSCZ
Calgary         - Kamloops          99.00   63.64   162.64  GP-56LSDZ
Calgary         - Kelowna           99.00   68.99   167.99  GP-56LSDK
Calgary         - Lloydminister    129.00   65.74   194.74  GP-56LSCJ
Calgary         - Montreal         299.00  104.93   403.93  GP-56LSH3
Calgary         - Regina           146.00   77.63   223.63  GP-56LSE3
Calgary         - Saskatoon        136.00   71.58   207.58  GP-56LSE9
Calgary         - Winnipeg         149.00   77.84   226.84  GP-56LSER
Campbell River  - Vancouver        109.00   51.50   160.50  GP-56LSEL
Charlottetown   - Halifax          159.00   82.50   241.50  GP-56LSFT
Comox           - Vancouver        109.00   51.50   160.50  GP-56LSEJ
Deer Lake       - St.John's        169.00   84.00   253.00  GP-56LSFQ
Edmonton        - Fort McMurray    158.00   65.63   223.63  GP-56LSCY
Edmonton        - Grande Prairie   169.00   66.40   235.40  GP-56LSCR
Edmonton        - Ottawa           279.00   84.80   363.80  GP-56LSGP
Edmonton        - Toronto          279.00   84.80   363.80  GP-56LSGM
Fredericton     - Toronto          229.00  106.00   335.00  GP-56LSF4
Halifax         - Ottawa           199.00   99.20   298.20  GP-56LSGW
Kelowna         - Vancouver         99.00   56.15   155.15  GP-56LSDJ
Kingston, ON    - Toronto          159.00   65.70   224.70  GP-56LSCG
London          - Ottawa           149.00   75.70   224.70  GP-56LSC9
Moncton         - Montreal         179.00   74.06   253.06  GP-56LSF9
Moncton         - Toronto          229.00   92.20   321.20  GP-56LSHA
Montreal        - Saint John       179.00   74.06   253.06  GP-56LSFB
North Bay       - Toronto          109.00   62.20   171.20  GP-56LSBR
Ottawa          - Quebec City      189.00   97.76   286.76  GP-56LSG6
Ottawa          - Vancouver        299.00   75.50   374.50  GP-56LSGS
Ottawa          - Winnipeg         199.00   79.20   278.20  GP-56LSF2
Prince George   - Vancouver        189.00   57.10   246.10  GP-56LSDQ
Prince Rupert   - Vancouver        209.00   58.50   267.50  GP-56LSDM
Quebec City     - Toronto          199.00   99.26   298.26  GP-56LSHG
Regina          - Toronto          269.00   84.10   353.10  GP-56LSGK
Regina          - Winnipeg         146.00   75.49   221.49  GP-56LSE5
Saint John      - Toronto          229.00   92.20   321.20  GP-56LSF6
Sarnia          - Toronto           79.00   60.10   139.10  GP-56LSC6
Saskatoon       - Toronto          269.00   78.75   347.75  DL-56NRKF
Saskatoon       - Winnipeg         146.00   70.14   216.14  GP-56LSE7
Sault Ste.Marie - Toronto          169.00   77.10   246.10  GP-56LSBT
St.John's       - Toronto          259.00  108.20   367.20  GP-56LSH7
Terrace         - Vancouver        209.00   58.50   267.50  GP-56LSDV
Thunder Bay     - Toronto          209.00   69.20   278.20  GP-56LSHE
Thunder Bay     - Winnipeg         169.00   66.40   235.40  GP-56LSGU
Toronto         - Victoria         299.00   80.85   379.85  GP-56LSHC
Vancouver       - Victoria          89.00   55.45   144.45  GP-56LSEF
Vancouver       - Whitehorse       199.00   57.80   256.80  GP-56LSEU
Vancouver       - Winnipeg         209.00   69.20   278.20  GP-56LSET

---------------------------------------------------------------------
For Car & Hotel specials, click here:

http://www.aircanada.ca/websaver/carhotel.html

Delta Hotels & Resorts
Hilton Hotels & Resorts, Doubletree Hotels, Embassy Suites Hotels
Marriott Hotels
Fairmont Hotels & Resorts
Westin, Sheraton, St. Regis, Four Points by Sheraton & W Hotels
Holiday Inn
Radisson Hotels
Budget Canada
Hertz
Avis
Thrifty

---------------------------------------------------------------------

________________________________________
Air Canada  -
http://www.aircanada.ca

Subscribe/Unsubscribe ...
http://www.aircanada.ca/websaver/direct.html

GENERAL TERMS & CONDITIONS ...
http://www.aircanada.ca/websaver/conditions.html


THANKS !!

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Mark,

Thanks. Vince

From: Mark Lay/ENRON@enronXgate on 02/16/2001 10:55 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: Blood Bank

Vince,

I must apologize.  I have not had time to look over the proposal in any
detail.  When I first spoke with your friend, it was apparent that he was
still pre-business plan stage.  He has since sent me some ideas and
information.  I think the concept has merit, but there are so many political
issues that I am concerned about the ultimate business viability.

Give me the weekend to look over the information.

Thanks,
Mark

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Kaminski, Vince
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 10:00 AM
To: Mark Lay/HOU/ECT@ENRON
Subject: Blood Bank

Mark,

Any further thoughts on the blood bank concept?
Please, let  me know if I can be helpful?

Vince


Great. thank you.
Monika

-----Original Message-----
From: Chanaba, Nyree
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 8:59 AM
To: Causholli, Monika
Subject: RE: Expense Report Receipts Not Received

Monika,

All it is asking is for the receipts,  I already mailed the original receipts.  Let me know if you receive this message again.

Thank you,
Nyree I. Chanaba
713-345-4035
EIM Fundamental Analysis

-----Original Message-----
From: Causholli, Monika
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 7:43 AM
To: Chanaba, Nyree
Subject: FW: Expense Report Receipts Not Received

Nyree,

I received this message and i don't know what it means. Can you help?

thank you,
Monika
-----Original Message-----
From: enron_update@concureworkplace.com
[mailto:enron_update@concureworkplace.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 11:30 PM
To: Causholli, Monika
Subject: Expense Report Receipts Not Received

Employee Name: Monika Causholli
Report Name:   Monika Causholli
Report Date:   10/25/01
Report ID:     1CD662BAC8BB11D5B373
Submitted On:  10/25/01

You are only allowed 2 reports with receipts outstanding.  Your expense reports will not be paid until you meet this requirement.


Updated by: CN=Phillip M Love/OU=HOU/O=ECT


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 03/29/2001
10:43 AM ---------------------------

Stacey Vallejo
03/29/2001 10:34 AM
To: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kam
Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sherry Dawson/NA/Enron@Enron, Carole Frank/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Aquila Canada Corp. deals in Houston books

Hi guys,

I've just come across a few deals that are in TAGG as settling between
ENA and Aquila Canada Corp.  These deals would not have shown up when
you looked for deals to flip to the FT-US/CAND-ERMS book as they aren't in
TAGG as ECC deals.  I have a feeling that there are lots of deals like this in
TAGG, but I just don't know where. We are having problems printing TAGG
tickets
up here, so I'm not able to see which books these deals are in right now.
What I'm
requesting is that you go through all your books and look for all deals with
Aquila
Canada Corp. that are to settle for March and April 2001, and after, and flip
these
deals into the FT-US/CAND-ERMS book as soon as possible.  As it stands,
I'm missing at least 10 deals from the April 2001 Nymex invoice, and I want to
make sure that these deals don't get invoiced by someone in Houston
settlements.
Nymex settled yesterday for April, so invoicing for these deals is taking
place
today.

I understand that you are all very busy right now, but it would really be
appreciated
if this was dealt with as soon as possible today.  The settlements group and
I need
to get our invoices sent out today, so we need these deals to be fixed right
away.

Please let me know if you have any questions on this matter, and let me know
if I
can assist you in any way.

Thanks so much for your help
Stacey-


thanks.

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Peter Berzins @ ENRON                           01/19/2001 08:26 AM

To: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: EOL Average Deal Count as of 1-17-01

Scott,

Frank has been added!

Thanks,
Pete

Scott Neal@ECT
01/18/2001 06:28 PM
To: Peter Berzins/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: EOL Average Deal Count as of 1-17-01

Peter,

please add Frank Vickers to this distribution list.

thanks,

scott neal


First, my thanks to all of you in your prompt response to get this important
meeting scheduled.

The first date we discussed, the 23rd of October was not feasible for some of
the group.

Therefore, we have made the following arrangements:

Subject: California Strategy
Date:  Monday, October 30th
Time:  9:00am - 3:00pm (working lunch)
Place:  3 World Trade Center
  Portland Office
  Mt. Hood Conference Room (3rd Floor)

Tim & Chris: Please feel free to forward this to anyone in you group you feel
should participate.

Anna/Jessica: Please change the appointments you scheduled for Tim and Chris
from the 23rd, to
  the date reflected above. (Anna, please call me at your convenience.)

Sue Mara: I know that your schedule does not allow you to the attend the
meeting, but since I
  was able to confirm the rest of the group we had to go ahead with this
date.  I will
  ensure that you receive an update of the meeting as well as any materials
that
  might come out of it.

Joseph: If you need assistance in making flight arrangments for this meeting,
please do not
  hesitate to contact me.  I can also produce/copy any documents that may be
needed
  so that your group does not have to bring them on the plane.

If you have any questions, please contact me at 503/464-7927

Again, many thanks for your assistance in making this happen!

Lysa Akin
Ass't to Paul Kaufman
503/464-7927


I'll call you after the holidays.  I'd like to know which company and what your doing.
I'm staying at Brett's this weekend...even though he is Maryland.  Parents are building a home and moved into a Cracker
Jack house for the next few months.

Deano

-----Original Message-----
From: Carl and Chrissy Christoferson [mailto:candc@gocougs.wsu.edu]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 7:22 AM
To: Dean, Craig
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Hey carl]

Interesting how we all turn out...   Give me a call when you get a chance.  New cell phone is 707-580-3020.  With a new company as of 3 months or so ago.

Carl

"Dean, Craig" wrote:

> Yeah, I'm alive and still w/Enron...but oh the details...I'll call you
> soon.
> Dean
>
> PS.  Never thought Oliver was into that "Party with all your Frat
> brother's at your wedding" sort of deal.
> Deano


[IMAGE]
   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] ANDY LEWIS [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Delivery Paid By Sender [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] ANDY --025567/JCR [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE]    PLEASE DO NOT INTERRUPT THE DELIVERY OF THIS IMPORTANT EMAIL TO THE INTENDED RECEIVER. DIRECT RESPONSE IS NOW EXPECTED.CLICK HERE!  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Genuine Diamond Award Recipient [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]    [IMAGE]      Final Notice of  Genuine Diamond Award   For Your Free Present Customers      ANDY,   I'm a little confused... Why haven't you claimed your Free* Diamond Award?  Due to the nature of this offer, we must limit the limit the amount of people we tell. Please know that this could be your FINAL NOTICE!  We are giving away a Million Dollars worth of Diamonds and you have been selected to qualify as a lucky recipient. We cannot spend any more of our money trying to convince you to take this opportunity, and register to win the grand prize three carat diamond solitaire necklace valued at $25,000.00.  Click here to claim your Free* Diamond Jewelry and get automatic entry for the $25,000.00 grand prize diamond! [IMAGE] ************** REMINDER ************** If you do not act on this official notice, your award will be forfeited.
 *This free gift offer is not available to CA State residents. This One Million Dollar Deal On A Diamond Giveaway consists of a sweepstakes offering one winner a Grand Prize of a 3 ct. Diamond Solitaire Necklace worth $25,000.00. No purchase necessary to enter or win. Odds of winning depend on number of entries received. In addition, up to 48,750 entrants may claim a FREE genuine Diamond jewelry with a retail value of $20.00 for a $4.99 shipping and handling charge (we reserve the right to increase the number of diamond giveaways). Click here for complete contest rules and privacy policy.


Do you have these to forward to our legal eagles?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nichols, Catherine
> Sent: Monday, February 05, 2001 10:39 AM
> To: Hutchens, David
> Cc: McCormick, Barbara
> Subject: ISDA
>
> Dave - In reviewing the ISDA Master Agr, Schedule and Annex, I noted in
> the Schedule that the ISDA definitions are incorporated into the Schedule
> - the reference is to the 1991 ISDA definitions - do we have these?
>
> Catherine A. Nichols
> Tucson Electric Power Company
> 1 South Church UE-201
> (520) 884-3609
> cnichols@tucsonelectric.com
>


Enron's trading policy prohibits employees from trading any products the
company trades.  If you have any questions about any specific products please
feel free to contact me or any of the London legal team.

	Mark Schroeder
	06/26/2000 04:46 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Enron North America Corp. NYMEX Hedge Exemption Applications

I currently do not have any such account.  Would this prohibit me from
opening one in the future?  thanks  mcs
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT on 26/06/2000
10:48 ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Mark Taylor @ ENRON                           22/06/2000 01:39

Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: Everyone_in_ECT_Calgary, Everyone_in_ECT_London, Everyone_in_ECT_Denver,
Everyone_in_ECT_Singapore
cc:

Subject: Enron North America Corp. NYMEX Hedge Exemption Applications

We are in the process of preparing applications for position limit exemptions
for ENA,s NYMEX energy commodities futures trading.  These applications
require that ENA represent whether its officers, employees, owners, or agents
have a power of attorney, control or have a financial interest in any other
related commodity future(s) account either individually or acting with
another person pursuant to express or implied agreement.

Please direct any responses to my paralegal, Tana Jones, via intercompany
email or call her at (713) 853-3399 by the end of business Friday, June 30,
2000 if you have any power of attorney, control or have a financial interest
in any commodity futures account (other than an ENA or other trading
affiliate account).

IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A COMMODITY FUTURES ACCOUNT, YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESPOND TO
THIS REQUEST.


Sara: attached is the memo that I received from Tozzini & Freire yesterday.
As you will notice, the memo addresses Gustavo's questions and corrects
certain assumptions made by him in his e-mail.

Sara Shackleton@ECT
08/24/99 02:10 PM
To: Andrea Bertone/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Brent Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Brazilian Regulations for Swaps & Prepays

Help me understand HOW MANY Tozzini memoranda exist which address financial
swaps and derivatives.  I e-mailed Michael about this attachment and I think
his response was that Antonio Felix ADDED comments to the attachment.  I am
not clear.  I am aware of only TWO Tozzini memos :  dated 12/26/97 (physical
trading of energy) and 2/20/98 (local derivatives market).  Let's all start
from the same point.  Thanks.  Sara
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 08/24/99 11:06
AM ---------------------------

Michael Guerriero@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

08/20/99 07:45 AM

To: Sara Shackleton@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Gustavo Junqueira/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, D'Arcy
Carroll/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Maria Ines
Granado/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Brazilian Regulations for Swaps & Prepays

Don Black has suggested we get you in the loop on the below issues we are
seeking answers on. We have some pending financial transactions that we would
like to work through all the Brazilian mechanics before proceeding. Your
primary contact down here for this issue will be Maria Ines Granado. Please
provide us with your comments as soon as possible so that we do not encounter
a transactional conflict.

Gustavo thank you for all your work to date we will keep you briefed to make
sure we have your input. Please follow up on the Tozzini issue we discussed
to make a final decision on their input.

Thanks
MFG

---------------------- Forwarded by Michael Guerriero/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
08/20/99 09:40 AM ---------------------------

	Enron International

	From:  Gustavo Junqueira                           08/17/99 06:19 PM

To: afac@tfts.tozzini.com.br
cc: Andrea Bertone/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michael
Guerriero/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, D'Arcy
Carroll/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Marcelo
Parodi/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Scott
Porter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Maria Ines
Granado/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, David S
Reinfeld/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Brazilian Regulations for Swaps & Prepays

Antonio Felix,

As Enron is finding several opportunities involving financial derivatives in
Brazil, we would like to get from Tozzini Freire Law Firm a summarized but
concise read on the "cans and cannots" of these type of transactions in
Brazil. Here is my understanding of the regulations from the memo you have
already sent to us regarding swaps and prepays as well as a list of the most
common examples of deals that Enron would be encountering in the marketplace.
I would appreciate if you could comment on what is written here and also add
further information so Enron can have some sort of menu of deals of this
nature that can be pursued. I would like to ask you to add your comment in
this same message to make the review process a little easier. Thank you
inadvance for your attention.

Swaps (Pulp & Paper, Petrochem, Power)

OTC Swaps

The Central Bank regulates swap transactions involving local financial
institutions acting either as dealers for their own account or as
intermediaries to the contracting parties. When the financial institutions
act as intermediaries, the agreements are in fact private agreements
negotiated by two non-financial companies, but become subject to the
requirements and regulations normally applicable to swaps involving financial
institutions. According to regulations currently in force, such swaps can
relate to exchange rates, interest rates, gold and price indices.

All of the swap agreements involving financial institutions must be
registered with CETIP or with another custody and clearing system authorized
by the Central Bank or the CVM (Brazilian SEC). As a matter of practice, the
agreements used by the banks that participate in the swap market do not
follow a standard form, since normally each bank has a particular sample form
with which it feels more comfortable.

Derivatives
In addition to exchange-traded derivatives and OTC swaps involving financial
institutions, there is no legal impediment, in principle, to derivatives
transactions being privately negotiated and entered into between two
interested parties. As a general rule in Brazil, as long as no specific
prohibition is found in the law, parties are free to negotiate agreements
that best suit their interests.

International Hedge
Central Bank regulations authorize that Brazilian companies enter into
transactions abroad, either in exchanges or having a financial institution as
their counterpart, to hedge against the fluctuation of interest rates,
exchange rates or commodity prices in the international markets.

Such hedge transactions must refer to payments in foreign currency scheduled
to be made by or to the Brazilian company in respect of commercial or
financial rights or obligations, or to payments in local currency arising out
of certain financial obligations subject to the variation of exchange rates
and payments relating to imports, exports or local transactions involving
commodities priced according to their valuation in foreign exchanges. The
commercial market exchange rates are applicable to foreign exchange
agreements referring to remittances of currency in connection with hedge
transactions.

When the underlying obligation/right is registered with the Central Bank, the
corresponding hedge transaction must be informed to the Central Bank within
10 days of its execution. When there is no registration with the Central
Bank, the banks executing the foreign exchange agreements relating to the
hedge transaction must verify the existence of the obligation/right being
hedged.

Examples

Commodity swap between two Brazilian companies:
As per what has been said above, there is nothing that precludes Enron Brazil
of entering into a swap with another Brazilian company regarding any
commodity traded by Enron (Pulp, Paper, Petrochem products, Power, Gas).
Enron does not need to be a financial institutions to provide swaps
transactions. On the other hand, I am not sure yet on the following points:
(1) Does such swap agreement should be registered with CETIP or any other
clearing system to be valid under Brazilian regulations? (2) What are the
taxes involved in a swap?

Commodity swap between a Brazilian company and an offshore company:
This kind of deal seems to be also available in the Brazilian market and the
only difference from example 1 would be the fact that it must be registered
with the Central Bank and it would involved transfer of foreign currency.

Commodity swap between two offshore companies but involving Brazilian exports:
I am not sure if Brazilian regulations would have anything to do with a
transaction like this one. I would assume that a Brazilian exporter would
sell to their offshore subsidiary and such subsidiary would sell to their end
customer. Enron would step in and offer a swap agreement for the offshore
subsidiary of the Brazilian company therefore Enron would not have any
involvement with Brazilian regulations because it would not be dealing with
Brazil.

Prepays (Pulp & Paper, Petrochem, Power)

The regulations currently in force governing export prepayments, especially
Central Bank of Brazil's Carta-Circular 2624, of February 14, 1996, establish
that all repayments of principal under such transactions must necessarily be
made by means of shipments of the relevant exported goods.  Carta-Circular
2624 allows cash remittances abroad only in regard to payments of interest
under the facility.  Therefore, it is not possible to structure a transaction
where the repayment of principal will be made only in cash or where the
borrower has the ability to choose between paying cash or exporting the goods.

A transaction that involves structuring a direct loan to the Brazilian
company where the value of the principal of which would be tied to the price
of the relevant commodity is very difficult to be approved.  Under a direct
loan registered with the Central Bank the borrower may remit all due amounts
of principal and interest in accordance with the schedule of payments
attached to the certificate of registration. The problem with such
alternative is that, although there are no express regulations preventing it
to do so, the Central Bank will most probably not issue a prior authorization
for such type of loan, as it only normally issues authorizations for normal
loans where the principal is a fixed amount and the interest rate is either a
fixed rate or a floating rate (normally based on LIBOR or US Treasury).  It
should also be noted that generally speaking all interest payments under such
an agreement are subject to withholding tax at the rate of 15% p.a.

CC 5 Account

A possible alternative way to structure a prepay would be by using a
non-registered loan with the Central Bank.  Under such alternative, the funds
disbursed by Enron under the loan would be remitted to Brazil through an
international transfer of Brazilian currency, as allowed by Circular 2677 of
the Central Bank of Brazil. The international transfer of Brazilian currency
("International Transfer") is a system which uses a non-resident current
account in Brazil and the Brazilian interbank foreign exchange market to
effect remittances of funds to and from Brazil.  Under such system, a lender
that wishes to disburse funds to a Brazilian borrower makes a foreign
currency deposit with a bank located outside of Brazil ("offshore bank")  and
instructs the offshore bank to deliver such dollars to a Brazilian bank in
exchange for Brazilian currency.  Such Brazilian currency is then deposited
in a non-resident account held by the offshore bank in Brazil and thereafter
transferred to the borrower. The repayments follow the inverse procedure,
i.e. the borrower deposits the amount in a non-resident account of an
offshore bank and instructs it to exchange the funds into foreign currency
and deliver them to the lender abroad.

The main differences between the registered loans and the non-registered
loans are that the non-registered loans are not subject to prior approval by
the Central Bank of Brazil (and therefore not subject to scrutiny as to their
minimum tenors and applicable interest rates) and the applicable foreign
exchange rate to non-registered loans is the floating rate (as opposed to the
commercial rate of exchange). All transfers of funds to Brazil as
International Transfers are subject to a Financial Transactions Tax ("IOF")
at the rate of 2% on the amount transferred, plus a bank fee that normally
ranges from 0.4% to 0.6% of such amount.  Any interest payments under a
non-registered loan are subject to withholding tax at the rate of 15% (or 25%
if the lender is located in a tax-haven jurisdiction).

I don't think this type of transaction is the best way to circumvent some of
the Brazilian regulations regarding prepayment given the bad press that deals
via the CC 5 Account mechanism would bring to Enron but I have it addressed
just in case someone does not share the same opinion.

Examples

Financial prepay between two Brazilian companies
Not allowed unless the company providing the prepay qualifies as a financial
institution as per Brazilian law. Since it will not be the case in Enron's
cases, we should not focus in these kind of transactions.

Financial prepay between a Brazilian company and an offshore company
As it has been mentioned before it is allowed as long as Enron can structure
the prepay in way where there is a pre-established amortization schedule for
principal and interest. It is very hard to structure a prepay with specific
split between principal and interest because the objective of the prepay is
to lock on a certain volume of a product and not on a specific price.
Therefore, if Enron prepays for a specific product on a floating basis the
attached value of that commodity can go up or down as the market fluctuates
as well as the total value associate to the deal. Such value can be either
principal or interest and it is impossible to determine what it will be.

Financial prepay between two offshore companies but one being a subsidiary of
a Brazilian entity
I think there is no restrictions in this case given the whole deal will be
closed offshore and the Brazilian authorities are not going to be involved.
It will most likely be a deal involving three parties: a company in Brazil,
its offshore subsidiary and Enron.

Physical prepay between two Brazilian companies
No restrictions.

Physical prepay between a Brazilian company and an offshore company
No restrictions as long as there is physical deliveries.

Physical prepay between two offshore companies but  involving Brazilian
exports
No restrictions. It would also involve three parties: a company in Brazil,
its offshore subsidiary and Enron.

Thanks,

Gustavo


Thanks Sam, you're the best!
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Boyd, Samantha
Sent:	Wednesday, October 31, 2001 10:05 AM
To:	Adams, Laurel; Allen, Kimberly; Anderson, Diane; Bailey, Derek; Bell, Jean; Bell, Rebecca; Bowen, Bob; Brewer, Julie; Cason, Sharen; Cisneros, Celeste; Fischer, Jason; Garcia, Jorge A. ; Heaney, Gordon; Hundl, Kimberly; Murphy, Melissa Ann; Ornelas, Bianca; Piwetz, Stephanie; Rodriguez, Melissa; Seib, Dianne; Theriot, Kim S.; Whalen, Melinda; Williams, Tiffany; Brackett, Debbie R.; Bradford, William S.; Brown, Angela Y.; Campbell, Lesli; Conwell, Wendy; Curry, Ken; Espinoza, Veronica; Gonzalez, Veronica; Johnson, Rudwell; Landry, Shemeika S.; Lebrocq, Wendi; Mendoza, Nidia; Monterrey, Maribel; Moran, Tom; Ngo, Tracy; North, Carol; Otto, Randy; Radous, Paul; Rajaram, Aparna; Rohauer, Tanya; Sacks, Edward; Sonnonstine, Max; Vanek, Darren; Williams, Jason R (Credit); Campos, Anthony; Colbert, Marilyn; Crawford, Sharon; Ebow, Amber; Ellstrom, Diane; Gerard, Camille; Hare, Bill D.; Johnson, Cheryl; Lambert, Karen; Landau, Georgi; Lees, Lisa; Moore, Jason; Neuner, Dale; Reeves, Leslie; Richardson, Stacey; Rodriguez, Bernice; Schott, Samuel; Sever, Stephanie; Shivers, Lynn; Sietzema, Linda; Southard, Carrie; Bailey, Susan; Cook, Mary; Gray, Barbara N.; Heard, Marie; Hendry, Brent; Jones, Tana; Koehler, Anne C.; Leite, Francisco Pinto; Nelson, Cheryl; Panus, Stephanie; Sayre, Frank; Shackleton, Sara; St. Clair, Carol; Taylor, Mark E (Legal)
Subject:	Duetsche Bank AG - Novation Agreement

We have received an executed Novation Agreement dated as of October 26, 2001 wherein all of the current Bankers Trust Group financial trades shall be transferred and governed under the ISDA Master Agreement  between Deutsche Bank AG and ENA dated effective as of December 29, 2000.   The Master Agreement between  Bankers Trust Group and ENA shall no longer be in effect.

Global Counterparty:  Please ensure that the ISDA Master Agreement referenced above is attached to this counterparty in EOL.

Confirmation Desk:  Please ensure that all EOL financial confirmations show this counterparty as "Deutsche Bank AG, acting through its New York Branch"

Copies will be distributed.

Samantha M. Boyd
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3803
Houston, Texas 77002
Ph:  (713) 853-9188
Fax:  (713) 646-3490


Attached is PG&E's Reply Brief in  I.99-07-003 filed July 31, 2000.
?
I e-mailed this Reply Brief yesterday to a  different list, so I apologize if
you are getting this twice.
?
Stephanie Louie (415-973-7956)
Secretary to EDWARD KURZ
?
?
 - reply-f.doc


logoInfoBeat: Don't miss a beat!
	Daily Dose
	[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]

	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]

	InfoBeat HomeUser Profile

	[IMAGE]
	DATE
	[IMAGE]
	Tuesday, December 05, 2000
	[IMAGE]

	[IMAGE]

	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]

	[IMAGE]

	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]

	[IMAGE]
	InfoBeat Fun - Daily Dose - 12/05/2000

	 Cool Site of the Day
	Fact of the Day
	Joke of the Day
	Quote of the Day
	Born Today

	[IMAGE]

	[IMAGE]

	[IMAGE]

	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]

	[IMAGE]

	[IMAGE]
	Click on Ad -- Support InfoBeat's Free Services

	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]Cool Site of the Day
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]

	When the planets align properly, two hot topics collide together to form a
parodist's dream. The folks at Brunching have come up with a winner in "Am I
President or Not?" - a play on the latest trend to sweep Webdom, AmIHotOrNot,
and the endless InjunctionFest that our Presidential Election has turned
into. Perfect to play with while taking a break from work or to forward to
your friends to remind them that we still don't know who will be running the
country next month. www.brunching.com/cgi/amipresidentornot

	[IMAGE]

	back to top

	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]Fact of the Day
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]

	At birth, a baby giraffe is already about 6 feet tall. By comparison, the
average human baby is about 20 inches long. For more, click here.

	[IMAGE]

	back to top

	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]Joke of the Day
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]

	'Old' Is When...
	Your friends compliment you on your new alligator shoes and you're barefoot.

	You don't care where your spouse goes, just as long as you don't have to go
along.

	You are cautioned to slow down by the doctor instead of by the police.

	"Getting a little action" means, "I don't need to take any fiber today."

	"Getting lucky" means you find your car in the parking lot.

	You start saying things like, "Gee, this sebaceous cyst is killing me!"

	Someone mistakes you for a sun-dried tomato while you're shopping at the
grocery store.

	An "all nighter" means not getting up to pee!

	For more jokes, click Joke-Of-The-Day.com

	[IMAGE]

	back to top

	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]Quote of the Day
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]

	Thought For Today: "No man knows his true character until he has run out of
gas, purchased something on the installment plan and raised an adolescent." -
Marcelene Cox, writer.

	[IMAGE]

	back to top

	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]Born Today
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]

	- Senate President Pro Tempore Strom Thurmond (R-S.C.) is 98.
	- Singer Little Richard is 68.
	- Author Joan Didion is 66.
	- Author Calvin Trillin is 65.
	- Musician J.J. Cale is 62.
	- Actor Jeroen Krabbe is 56.
	- Pop singer Jim Messina is 53.
	- Actress Morgan Brittany is 49.
	- Actress Carrie Hamilton is 37.
	- Country singer Ty England is 37.
	- Rock singer-musician John Rzeznik (Goo Goo Dolls) is 35.
	- Country singer Gary Allan is 33.
	- Comedian-actress Margaret Cho is 32.
	- Actor Ross Bagley is 12.

	Source: Associated Press

	[IMAGE]

	back to top

	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]

	Click on Ad -- Support InfoBeat's Free Services

	[IMAGE]

	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	You are subscribed with e-mail address: [judy.hernandez@enron.com]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	InfoBeat Home | User Profile | Unsubscribe
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	entertainment | finance | fun | news | snow reports | sports | weather

	(C) 2000 indimi, inc. All rights reserved.
	InfoBeat is a registered tradmark of indimi, inc. InfoBeat services are
	for personal use only. Commercial use or redistribution in any
	form, printed or electronic, is prohibited.

	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]


Grant,

Did you respond to this one?

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 08/24/2000
04:15 PM ---------------------------

Dale Surbey
08/21/2000 04:56 AM
To: Grant Masson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Long-Term Volatility Curves

Grant,

Can Research in Houston put together a comparison of the long-term volatility
curves for gas and power in North America and Europe?  Based on where Europe
is marked (especially for the UK), I think we'll find a significant
difference out beyond 10 years.  Fundamentally, it seems like the long-term
vol should be similar for a given commodity regardless of geographic location.

Has Research done any work on this in the past?  If not, we should study this
since long-term vol feeds into the VAR-based position limits.

Give me a call so we can discuss.

Thanks

Dale


Financial Settlements have revised their data:

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dahanayake, Bernard
Sent:	Friday, November 09, 2001 11:03 AM
To:	DL-CRM Houston; DL-CRM Non-Houston
Subject:	Cash Update for Financial Settlements as of November 08,2001 - Revised


Attached is a 1Q 2001 Market Commentary from the PaineWebber Tactical
Allocation Fund.

Hank Emery
Financial Advisor
Emery Financial Group
UBS PaineWebber Incorporated
Houston, Texas
713-957-7060

Notice Regarding Entry of Orders and Instructions: Please
do not transmit orders and/or instructions regarding your
PaineWebber account(s) by e-mail. Orders and/or instructions
transmitted by e-mail will not be accepted by PaineWebber and
PaineWebber will not be responsible for carrying out such orders
and/or instructions.  Notice Regarding Privacy and Confidentiality:
PaineWebber reserves the right to monitor and review the content of
all e-mail communications sent and/or received by its employees.
 - Market Commentary _1Q01.pdf


I reviewed the counterparties in our Financial Trading Database and located
17 who cannot enter into financial power transactions and cross-checked that
list against my Online Trading Counterparty List and located the 6
counterparties below have been opened to trade online and who cannot trade
financial power and/or who have some type of restriction in place on the type
of financial power transactions they can enter into:

1.  The Bakersfield Californian - can only do newsprint swaps and options
2.  CMS Marketing, Services and Trading - can enter into financial power
transactions only if those transactions are fixed price swaps, basis swaps,
swing swaps and options
3.  Phibro, Inc. - can only do natural gas, crude oil or oil product energy
prices swap, put & call options.  Per my discussions with Tom, this
counterparty is coming through on tonight's list as an amended counterparty
because they want to do financial power.  They have a really old form of
agreement in place from 1993 and it does not allow power financial
transactions.  I spoke to Mark Taylor about this and he said if they want to
do financial power they are going to have to replace this agreement with an
ISDA.  I am going to talk to Credit about this.  They will definitely not be
able to trade financial power by Monday...
4.  PXRE Corporation - weather only
5.  Swiss Re Financial Products Corporation - weather only
6.  Tempest Reinsurance Company Limited - weather only


Start Date: 4/17/01; HourAhead hour: 21;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041721.txt


Discussion for "Organizational Restructure Modifications" to aleviate the tax
burden to employees as they change companies.

For those who need to call into the conference room, please call
1-888-830-6260 and you access code is 612983.

If you are unable to attend please have someone represent you.


It's me.
This is so helpful Jeff.  I really do appreciate it.  You can send to me
Haas address or just reply to this email.
Thanks again-I'll see you Saturday.
Courtney
g  GE Financial Assurance
_____________________________________
Courtney L. Abernathy
Long Term Care Division
San Rafael, California
Account Manager
415-492-7238, Internal 8*277-7238 (phone)
415-492-7099, Internal 8*277-7099(fax)

  -----Original Message-----
  From: Jeff Dasovich [mailto:jdasovic@enron.com]
  Sent: Thursday, December 09, 1999 11:05 AM
  To: abernath@haas.berkeley.edu
  Subject:

  hi.  let me know if you get this and i'll e-mail you the
country summaries.


The Boston Differential for Sep 2001 is ($.1187).

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Wednesday, September 19, 2001 2:18 PM
To:	Donlevy-Lee, Kelly; Laporte, Nicole
Cc:	Concannon, Ruth; Mckay, Jonathan; Fletcher, Brenda H.; Singla, Kimat; Keiser, Kam
Subject:	RE: Boston Gas

The Boston Differential for August 2001 is ($.1166).  I want to understand the contract better before I give you the Sep price.

Ruth, you and I are chatting about this today I hope.

Kam, I'm guessing this becomes an O&A issue each month.  I don't know if you need to be involved or not.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Donlevy-Lee, Kelly
Sent:	Wednesday, September 19, 2001 10:32 AM
To:	Germany, Chris
Cc:	Laporte, Nicole
Subject:	FW: Boston Gas

Hi Chris,

I realize that you are getting bugged from a few of us in Canada for the Boston Differential numbers.  I am in Accounting and I am in desperate need of the Boston Differential for August and September so that I can finish my invoicing for the month.  I really have to have these numbers by the end of the day today (latest).  Sorry for being a pest, but I am starting to panic!  Please send these numbers to me or Nicole Laporte, as soon as possible.

Thanks,
Kelly

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wells, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, September 17, 2001 1:18 PM
To:	Vallejo, Stacey; Donlevy-Lee, Kelly
Subject:	FW: Boston Gas

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Laporte, Nicole
Sent:	Monday, September 17, 2001 1:15 PM
To:	Germany, Chris
Cc:	Wells, Michelle
Subject:	RE: Boston Gas

Chris,
We just require August and September, we already have July.
Would it possible to get the differential number before Wednesday? Our Accounting group requires this number for invoicing and they are a few weeks late with their August invoice and require the differential immediately.
Please let me know,
Thanks,
Nicole

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Monday, September 17, 2001 12:51 PM
To:	Laporte, Nicole
Subject:	RE: Boston Gas

Sorry about the delay.  I'm starting to look at this again.  I know you need August and September.  Did you say you also need July?

I don't know if Canada makes any money off this deal but my book is taking a beating.  Ruth Concannon and I are meeting Wednesday to discuss this deal.  There are some other things going on with this deal that she is aware of.  I should have your prices by them.

Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Laporte, Nicole
Sent:	Wednesday, September 12, 2001 11:57 AM
To:	Germany, Chris
Subject:	RE: Boston Gas

Chris,
Attached is a spreadsheet listing the differential since January 1998.
Please let me know as soon as you know something!
Thanks!
Nicole
 << File: BostonGasDifferential.xls >>

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Wednesday, September 12, 2001 10:47 AM
To:	Laporte, Nicole
Cc:	Singla, Kimat
Subject:	FW: Boston Gas

Nicole, would you send us the last price you were given please?

Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Singla, Kimat
Sent:	Wednesday, September 12, 2001 10:35 AM
To:	Germany, Chris
Subject:	RE: Boston Gas

Chris, I remember there used to be one excel spreadsheet on Boston. But I can't find any on my CPU, perhaps it got lost when they upgraded my CPU. Do you have it? Let me know what we need to do. Thanks.

Kimat

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Monday, September 10, 2001 12:44 PM
To:	Laporte, Nicole; Singla, Kimat
Subject:	Boston Gas

Nicole, I have the Boston Gas confirmation letter.  Thanks.

Kimat, are you familiar with the Boston Gas worksheet Dick Jenkins would update to calculate the Tenn Z6 city gate price?  It wasn't very big, and Dick would have me verify the Iroquois and Tenn transport variable cost.