Below is a summary of my SWPTF, CAISO and SW IOU's meeting 10 days ago.  The
meeting was very positive and it looks like we are getting traction on
getting the SW IOU's to join the CAISO as an option to continuing with DSTAR.

Call me if you have questions

Tom Delaney    602-321-5017
---------------------- Forwarded by Tom Delaney/Corp/Enron on 06/21/2000
02:45 PM ---------------------------

Carl Imparato <cfi1@tca-us.com> on 06/19/2000 02:37:50 AM
Please respond to cfi1@tca-us.com
To: zalaywan@caiso.com, eschmid@caiso.com, crobinson@caiso.com,
vkasarjian@caiso.com, tom.delaney@enron.com, marcie.milner@enron.com,
smara@enron.com, scott.miller@gen.pge.com, curt.hatton@gen.pge.com,
dcn@netwrx.net, rreilley@coral-energy.com, steve.huhman@southernenergy.com,
mike.meclenahan@southernenergy.com, rlamkin@seiworldwide.com,
lebarrett@duke-energy.com, sslavigne@duke-energy.com,
john_r_orr@reliantenergy.com, gkelly@bdrnet.com, jmpa@dynegy.com,
kewh@dynegy.com, mbochotorena@calpx.com, tfitchitt@newenergy.com,
cmiessner@newenergy.com, marceline_otondo@apses.com, bob_anderson@apses.com,
barbara_klemstine@apses.com, lcampbell@csllp.com, locb@rt66.com,
reickley@ci.scottsdale.az.us, cary.deise@aps.com, joel.spitzkoff@aps.com,
david.rumolo@pwenergy.com, tdelawder@tucsonelectric.com,
ebeck@tucsonelectric.com, mflores@tucsonelectric.com, gmiller@pnm.com,
dbrown1@pnm.com, dmalone@epelectric.com, rick.y.ito@us.pwcglobal.com,
tanuj.khandelwal@us.pwcglobal.com, ptaylor@rwbeck.com
cc:

Subject: Update on Discussions between CAISO and DSW Parties

The purpose of this e-mail is to update the recipients on the status of
the discussions that have been taking place, between the CAISO and
Desert Southwest market participants and transmission owners, on the
possible merger of the California and Desert Southwest regions into a
single RTO.

On June 5, a meeting was held in Phoenix to discuss the terms under
which various parties would seriously consider a proposal for
consolidation of California and the DSW under a single RTO operated by
the CAISO.  This was the second meeting that was held to discuss this
idea.  Represented were the CAISO, APS, PNM, TEP, EPE, TNP, APSES,
NewEnergy, Enron, Calpine, PG&E Gen, Southern, Duke, Cal PX, and DOE.

The issues that were discussed included the CAISO's ability to implement
the major components of the DSTAR commercial model, the changes that
would need to be made in the CAISO's governance and internal structure,
and costs.

The parties at the meeting were generally in favor of:  (i)
consolidating the existing control areas into a single control area as
soon as possible, (ii) migrating to a common set of market protocols on
a fairly rapid basis, (iii) creating a single, independent, RTO
governing board with no bias in favor of either California or the Desert
Southwest region, and (iv) migrating from a regional advisory committee
structure to a single advisory committee structure as soon as possible,
to avoid balkanization and accelerate convergence.  Most parties felt
that there were, at this time, no "show-stoppers" on most of the issues.

For many of the participants, the most significant outstanding questions
were: (i) the costs (both $/MWh and cost shifts) that Desert Southwest
parties would incur under the consolidation scenario, and (ii) timing -
i.e., whether the necessary implementation, governance and
organizational changes could be put into place by a target date of June
2001.

It was agreed that the next step was for the CAISO, working with
interested parties, to provide a tentative implementation cost (both
with and without consolidation of DSW control areas, but in both cases
with independent procurement and operation of ancillary services).

The agreed-upon Action Plan was as follows:

June 9: CAISO to develop list of questions which need to be answered to
enable it to develop a cost estimate

June 16: CAISO to respond to the list of questions generated at the June
5 meeting

June 16:  CAISO to be provided with responses to the CAISO's list of
questions

June 16: Transmission owners to provide to the CAISO their definition of
the scenario(s) that they desire the CAISO to consider in developing its
cost estimate

July 10: CAISO to provide cost estimate

July 20: Meeting in Phoenix to discuss the cost estimate, address any
additional questions, and discuss the viability and possible contents of
a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)

July 31:  Decision from all interested parties regarding their desire to
move forward

August 15: Assuming a positive outcome on July 31, meeting to discuss
finalization of an MOU which would address the commitments of the
parties, market structure, changes in governance, organizational goals,
priorities and structures, etc.

Status:  The first four items above are close to completion.   The CAISO
has sent a list of technical questions to Carl Imparato and he is
completing a response.  The CAISO is completing its response to the list
of questions it received on June 5.  The interested transmission owners
have defined the scenarios that they wish to see considered by the
CAISO.

When all of these documents are finalized, which I expect to occur in
the next 2-3 days, I will forward them to all of the addresses.

If you have any questions, please give call me at 510-558-1456.

Carl Imparato


The following amounts are of Friday, Saturday and Sunday.

Regards, Maricely


Paul,

We see what you refer to as " the Cavanaugh/Edison bill" as a re-play of AB
1421 from last year.  That bill will destroy the retail market.  We opposed
1421 and we'll oppose any son of 1421. We do not want to see it tied to any
aggregation bill, the public goods charge extension or anything else.

Sue Mara

Paul Fenn <paulfenn@local.org> on 02/24/2000 07:03:12 PM
To: Don Dame <DDame@ncpa.com>
cc: Gary Ackerman <foothi19@idt.net>, Beth Bloom <bbloom@apx.com>, Bill Ross
<billr@calpine.com>, Bob Anderson <Robert_Anderson@apses.com>, Corby Gardin
<jcgardin@newwestenergy.com>, Curtis Kebler
<Curtis_L_Kebler@reliantenergy.com>, David Bobo <david-bobo@hlp.com>, Greg
Blue <gtbl@dynegy.com>, Ken Czarnecki <Ken_J_Czarnecki@calpx.com>, Kent
Wheatland <KEWH@dynegy.com>, Leah Bissonette <lbissone@energy.twc.com>, Randy
Hickok <rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, Rob Lamkin <rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>,
Rob Nichol <rsnichol@newwestenergy.com>, robert berry <berry@apx.com>, Roger
Pelote <rpelote@energy.twc.com>, Sue Mara <smara@enron.com>, Tom Delaney
<tom_delaney@enron.com>, Vicki Sandler <Vicki_Sandler@apses.com>, Dan
Douglass <douglass@earthlink.net>, Don Dame <DDame@ncpa.com>, Old Deuteronomy
<mflorio@turn.org>, Sean Casey <sfc@cpuc.ca.gov>, Jim Price
<jep@cpuc.ca.gov>, Paul Fenn <paulfenn@local.org>
Subject: RE: WPTF, Community Choice

Don,

While the points you make are good ones, I think we should go for it this
year.

First, the Cavanaugh/Edison bill will in part restructure Chapter 854
regarding the role of the default provider, and Edison will be asking for a
solidification of its distribution role, so this it is the natural vehicle
to redress aggregation. If we wait until next year it may be too late,
because we will be pushing rather than pulling. I think Edison and PG&E may
put up less of a fight in this context.

Second, while the League of Cities has not been involved, twelve cities and
counties representing 2 million Californians passed a resolution last year
asking the legislature for Community Choice. The leaders, from the Southern
California Cities Joint Powers Consortium, San Francisco, Oakland, and
Marin County, are actively involved in geting support from Bowen and
Burton. Oakland is planning a statewide conference of cities and national
leaders on Community Choice this Summer, which would coincide with
committee hearings and attract media attention. In both Massachusetts and
Ohio, we had weak support from the Leagues and did the job with about 35
municipalities represented. I am confident we will have that number in
California this year.

Third, TURN is providing strong support for the bill. I believe CALPIRG,
UCAN and other consumer groups will give strong support as a result of the
national coalition for Community Choice legislation, RAGE, which has signed
most of them on the agenda over the past two years.

Finally, the PUC is looking into Distribution Competition this year, and
both the ORA and Strategic Planning are actively interested in Community
Choice as a strategy for making the market work.

As you described it, the legislation allows municipalities to implement
Community Choice programs, and does not require it.

Regards,

Paul Fenn

At 02:17 PM 02/24/2000 -0800, you wrote:
>I truly believe that giving local public entities the right, but not the
>obligation, to provide default commodity service will advance competition
>and provide one more check against host IOU economic hegemony.
>
>To get legislation passed, however, will require at least three components:
>
>1) An informed, supportive bill sponsor (Debra Bowen would be ideal,
>and lots of other legislative support).
>
>2) A bit of national focus and support (say APPA and others)
>
>3) And, vocal support from the League of Cities and other local
>government organizations.
>
>I do not believe we are yet close to at least two of the above three.  I may
>make sense to generate more widespread support and debate before submitting
>a bill which will not pass.  PG&E and SCE will mount a very effective attack
>on any bill giving default rights to local governments.  If we try
>prematurely and fail, subsequent attempts may be doomed to failure as well.
>
>I believe that we should work the turf and see if we can generate some local
>govt. enthusiasm for such a bill, without which it will not likely pass.
>Although I hate to delay, the chances of success may increase if we wait
>6-12 months and use the interim period to gain additional support.
>
>Any rebuttal??
>
Paul Fenn
paulfenn@local.org
Tel/Fax 510 451 1727
American Local Power Project
1615 Broadway 1005
Oakland, CA 94612
United States
local.org


Please amend the ISDA dated 6/12/97 between ENA and the counterparty by
reducing TransAlta's collateral threshold from $15MM (CAD $) to $10MM (CAD
$).  Credit is just reshifting line allocations with the different TransAlta
entities.  The contacts at the cp are:
  Maureen Piercey (credit)  403-267-7987
  Sterling Koch (legal) 403-267-6991
Call with comments or questions.  Thanks

Rgds,
Ed Sacks


Lorraine Becker
EnronOnline
Marketing
713-853-1680 Office
713-646-2126 Fax
713-291-2334 Cellular
Lorraine.Becker@enron.com


Bill,

We spent about an hour  with Rick explaining the rationale behind different
solutions
and I think he has a better understanding of the models at this point.

I think he was asked by Jeremy to look into it.

Vince

From: William S Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/11/2001 09:05 PM
To: Rick Buy/ENRON@enronXgate, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Ruane/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject: FW: Credit Risk Model Comments - at this point.

Rick/Vince,

Should this not be a Credit/Research initiative while the business unit
focuses on originating good economic transactions?  Not to be complaining,
but shouldn't EES be focusing on infrastructure issues rather than waste
resources on a project we are already moving forward on?  You can't run a
portfolio model, unless you have deals in a risk system!  How complex do we
want these MODELS to be?  Behavioral implications on credit default?  They
still don't seem to understand.

Regards,
Bill

Mark - please attend.  You may want to include Martin to help EES understand
the complexity of their deals.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Krishnarao, Pinnamaneni
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 9:14 AM
To: Kaminski, Vince; Dhar, Amitava; De, Rabi; William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ENRON; Tamarchenko, Tanya
Subject: Credit Risk Model Comments - at this point.

Comments from Rick Jones on the credit reserve model. Anita Dupont is setting
up a meet with Rick Jones to discuss  these. Vince & Bill -  if you want to
join the meeting, please let me or Anita know.

Regards,
Krishna.
---------------------- Forwarded by Pinnamaneni Krishnarao/HOU/ECT on
04/11/2001 09:04 AM ---------------------------

Richard B Jones@EES
04/10/2001 04:16 PM
To: Pinnamaneni Krishnarao/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Credit Risk Model Comments - at this point.

---------------------- Forwarded by Richard B Jones/HOU/EES on 04/10/2001
04:16 PM ---------------------------

Richard B Jones
03/23/2001 05:53 PM
To: Cheryl Lipshutz/HOU/EES@EES, Trushar Patel/Corp/Enron@Enron,
michelle.wenz@enron.com, Gayle Muench/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeremy
Blachman/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Credit Risk Model Comments - at this point.

Hi everyone,

I have run the model and, along with the contract briefs I have some
questions & ideas. I was hoping to talk to each of you so I could avoid
writing this detailed, one-sided e-mail, but with our schedules being so
exclusive, this will have to do for now.

Every deal has its own model because of the commodity deal structure
complexity. So no aggregate results can be obtained without having the models
for each contract. However, the JC Penny,s version can serve as a testing
platform for some of the items I am mentioning below. I have not talked to
the people in research who are the most knowledgeable about the model, so
some of these comments may be mute points. I plan to do that went I get back.

1) Since the credit risk is developed for a time period, it makes sense to
regularly update the commodity data (and credit rating if its chaged) and
re-run the model for the time remaining.  I would expect this is done already.

2) The default probabilities seem not to change. That is, if the input credit
rating is E1, then the E1 default probability curve is used for the contract
period. For annual accounting that seems OK, but in MTM, it seems to me that
the credit analysis needs to take into consideration the credit rating
transition probabilities.  That is, the credit implications of companies
changing their credit rating during the contract period. with some
constraints imposed by actually slow credits appear to change would give a
more realistic view of our credit risk in the MTM world.

3) Are all "defaults" created equal to us? Look at OC. It seems to me that
the data used to develop the default probabilities are over different
business segments and are OK ----for that range of companies. However, we are
dealing with specific types of firms where "default" may not mean we do not
get paid. Sure we still have some credit risk, but it,s not like Montgomery
Ward,s where the lights are being turned off for good. Energy is so
fundamental for a company,s success and default actions can be used as a way
to save a company albeit in a different form.  So financial default does not
neccesarily mean default for EES commodity payments totally.

4) A while back someone said to me that may, maybe the people who reach for a
life preserver are more likely to live than those that don,t. By that I mean
that, perhaps our use of these default probabilities actually overstates the
credit risk in that if a company has at least enough proactive vision to
contract EES, then they are more likely to improve that one that doesn,t.
This is a type of behavioral variable that the data doesn,t consider. This
would be a useful MBA project to examine these types of corporate variables
and compare it to their credit rating forward curve.

5) This leads me to something I hope we can acomplish in the special finance
team. The contract briefs are, to me, the begimnning of this exercise.  If we
can combine our customers into "exposure group portfolios" (for lack of a
better term), where a group has similar "risk characteristics" beyind the
current parameter set, that we define, then this offers a potential to shop
some of these exposure to specialized insurance markets.

6) A technical point. Monte Carlo simulations are numerical experiments.
Besides the model assumptions, numerical experiments have three inherent
error attributes; the number of trials, numerical roundoff, and random number
generator randomness statistical properties. The first two are not a problem
in this application but the last one could be. Has anyone examined the effect
of using different random number generators on Enron,s aggregate credit risk?

7) There is one last point here. For most of the above points, the "improved"
analysis could make the credit risk be higher.

Rick


Joseph will set up the call and distribute to the list.

	Rebecca W Cantrell@ECT
	12/12/2000 06:56 PM

		 To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Steve Montovano/NA/Enron@Enron@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron@ECT,
Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron@ECT, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron@ECT
		 Subject: Conference Call/Gas Issues Paper

This is all I have received.   I asked for a confirmation, but have not
received one yet.  I got Lysa's phone mail, so I don't know if she is there
or not.

---------------------- Forwarded by Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT on 12/12/2000
06:52 PM ---------------------------

Lysa Akin
12/11/2000 05:43 PM
To: Leslie Lawner/HOU/EES@EES, Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron, Roy Boston/HOU/EES@EES, Steve Montovano/DUB/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Conference Call re: Gas Curtailment and Diversion Paper

Please advise ASAP your availability for a call regarding the above
referenced topic on Wednesday, December 13th at
7:00 am Pacific / 9:00am Central / 10:00am Eastern

Lysa Akin
Enron Corp.
Sr. Admin. Ass't. - Gov't Affairs
121 SW Salmon, 3WTC0306
Portland, OR  97204
Office (503) 464-7927
Fax (503) 464-3740
lysa.akin@enron.com


Since receiving your e:mail message last Monday on your needs in power, I
have spent three (!!!) full days in PRC meetings since then.  I have shared
your needs with both Todd Hall and Kristin Albrecht (my power business
controller here in Houston) and have gotten their thoughts on how we could be
of help.  Sorry that I keep missing your calls.  I will be meeting with
Fernley, but I will also try to reach you by phone tomorrow.


Start Date: 4/16/01; HourAhead hour: 1;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041601.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 1 / Preferred:  12.00 / Final:  11.98)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/16/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_LUCKY
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 1 / Preferred:   2.00 / Final:   1.86)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE4
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/16/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


Cindy,
Attached for your further handling are the Enron Corp. Guaranty and related certificates needed in connection with an ISDA Master Agreement between ENA and Seminole Energy Services, L.L.C.

Please call me if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Stephanie


Sc ott,
I'm planning on taking your emails and revising the current draft to create a
new one.  Your points were very well thought out, so I would like to have the
day to get a new draft.  It looks like I will be at home tomorrow since I'm
still not feeling well, but I certainly feel well enough to work on the
contract.  Perhaps we will get some input from our team in Conn. gang by noon.

How does this sound?

Stephen,
Feel free to weigh in with any comments/suggestions.  Your  input is welcome.

Kay

PS I can now print at home.


Have a great work out.  I wish I could go with you.

Love you.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Harris, Steven
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 11:08 AM
To:	Geaccone, Tracy
Subject:

I'm going to work out at lunch time. I love you babe.


Jeff:
Just a few comments:

1. In the definition of termination Event, I think that the words "due to"
need to be put after the word "means" in the first line.

2. In Section 3.4(a), I noticed that the bracketed langugae "as it relates to
the Assigned Interest" has now been deleted.  Pursuant to my earlier comment
on this, what this maens to me is that with respect to the Fixed Payment
piece of this, we can never terminate the swap based on something that
happens to Pelican .  Is that the way it is supposed to work?  If so, plaese
explain why.

3. With respect to the lnagugae in Section 3.6(a), instead of saying in the
first sentence of such Section "the amount determined..." shouldn't it say
"the fair market value of Party A's remaining payment obligations under the
Transaction".  Section 2(x) of the confirm just refers to Disputed Matters
and it is not claer to me what is in dispute when an Event of Default or
Termination Event occurs and what amount Party A has to pay when these events
occur.  What is the priocedure for coming up with this amount?  Does each
party calculate it and then send it to the experts or do the experts just
determine it?

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


Dear Mr. Arora:
I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for taking the time and
effort to come to Owen and interview me for the Summer Associate Program at
Enron. I am excited about the prospect of developing newer markets and
e-markets for trading various financial instruments and wish to be a part of
the Enron team in the development of these new markets. I firmly believe
that my past experience in the commodities trading area and my finance and
e-commerce concentration at Owen would enable me to make a significant
contribution in developing newer markets and e-markets for various
commodities & products and would greatly appreciate an opportunity to be a
part of the Enron team. Many Thanks once again for interviewing me for the
summer associate program at Enron.

Sincerely,
Muthu (Max)

_____________________________________________
Muthukumar Krishnan
MBA 2002
Owen Graduate School of Management
Vanderbilt University

(615)-329-8922 (Home)
(615)-498-6533 (Mobile)
Muthukumar.Krishnan@owen2002.vanderbilt.edu
_____________________________________________


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/12/2001
02:27 PM ---------------------------

Vasant Shanbhogue
12/18/2000 03:14 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Wharton collaborative research

Here is a short note on potential research with Wharton.  Please review and
edit and then we can send some indication to the Wharton guys.    ----------

 The objective would be to define the amount of risk an enterprise can take,
and the difference between this and the actual amount of risk the enterprise
chooses to take based on the capital structure and reporting structure.  In
particular, one can view Enron as a hierarchy of companies, and assuming we
can separately quantify the risks of each unit, what framework would one use
to analyze risk at Enron?
  A related question is how one should represent risks in the different
units?  Risks may be of different types --- short-term volatility risk,
catastrophic risk, liquidity risk, etc --- what should one focus on for a
first cut?
 Another related question is to decide on the optimal amount of insurance
both at the unit level and the enterprise level, and relate the decision to
get insurance to the cost/benefit of insurance.


Ken

Further to my voice-mail and the notes below, my view is that an effective
Chinese Wall would obviate the need to check on whether we are holding
confidential info on a reference entity, but we'd appreciate your advice on
this.  I suspect Bryan wants to be personally protected against insider
dealing allegations which could otherwise arise, but please confirm.

Thanks

Paul
---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Simons/LON/ECT on 07/03/2000 18:54
---------------------------
From: Mark Taylor on 07/03/2000 12:13 CST
To: Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Credit

Any idea what Bryan plans to gain this way?  It's not clear to me that a hard
wall solves our problems with RE approvals but that's because I don't know.
Maybe Ken can shed some light on this.

Paul Simons
03/07/2000 08:01 AM
To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Credit

FYI, there apppears to have been a sea change in Bryan's attitude to having a
hard Chinese wall for his trans-atlantic credit trading group.  In short, he
wants to be behind one and apparently John Sherriff is comfortable with
this.  I have therefore asked Ken Raisler to advise us on how to construct a
Chinese Wall from a practicle, US perspective, with the intention of having
Sanjev at Slaughters modify the "instruction kit", as necessary, to work
under English law.  Given Ken's involvement on equity trading, he appears to
be the right place to start.  There remains the possibility that when the
traders see the procedures they will change their minds and wish to stick
with the existing procedures you have seen.

This will not impact launch of credit trading online which, as advised, is
still set for tomorrow.

Please let me have any thoughts on this.

Regards

Paul


Read the latest eBiz and find out what Ken Lay said to employees at the all-employee meeting and what financial analysts said about the company after Jeff's resignation.

Also in this issue:
Teesside and California updates
EES gets big success from small customers
Texas deregulation gets delayed
After two years of tough negotiations, Enron's Hainan plant finally sells
You've seen it before -- but what is Btue/d?

It's all in the latest eBiz http://home.enron.com/pubs/ebiz/issues/082401/.  Or go to home.enron.com (http://home.enron.com ), click Publications, then click eBiz, and "eBiz August 24, 2001."

<Embedded >


Start Date: 2/6/02; HourAhead hour: 8;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002020608.txt
###Cannot locate a Preferred or Revised_Preferred Schedule that matches the FINAL Individual Interchange Schedule.  Unable to assign deal number.


OK

Keith Miceli@ENRON
08/10/2000 06:04 PM
To: John Ambler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steven J
Kean@EES@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Richard Shapiro@EES@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Richard
Leibert/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mark
Palmer@ENRON@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Karen Denne@ENRON@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dennis
Vegas/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: Final Call for Input to Summer Stakeholder Letter

Task Team Members:  Attached is Draft # 3 of the Summer Stakeholder letter.
It incorporates changes recommended by Jim Bannantine and Rick Shapiro.
Please send me your input by COB tomorrow, Friday, August 11, so I can
finalize and forward to Dick.  Regards,  Keith


The attached names were just overlayed in GCP.

ACX Technologies, Inc.           to                Graphic Packaging
International Corporation
Newquest Energy Inc.              to                Ranchero Energy Inc.

The short names will be changed tomorrow afternoon, Thu,  Dec. 7. if there
are no objections.

Thanks

Cheryl x3-3103


yes

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 01/05/2001 01:49 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: will call about fare when I return from lunch

These flights ok?  They will upgrade, if available, when purchased.  The 3
day advance purchase price is $1,501.  Want me to get them ticketed?
----- Forwarded by Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT on 01/05/2001 01:48 PM -----

	Diane Fitzgerald <diane.fitzgerald@travelpark.com>
	01/05/2001 12:41 PM

		 To: "'suzanne.adams@enron.com'" <suzanne.adams@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: will call about fare when I return from lunch

                                                   SALES AGT: DF/YZYYCU

                                          MANN/C KAY
                                          3AC 400

  ENRON CORP

  DATE:  JAN 05 2001

SERVICE               DATE  FROM           TO             DEPART  ARRIVE

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES  09JAN HOUSTON TX     WASHINGTON DC  750A    1141A
CO 1450    H          TUE   G.BUSH INTERCO R REAGAN NAT
                            TERMINAL C     TERMINAL B
                            SNACK                         NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         2:51 DURATION
                  AIRCRAFT: BOEING 737-500
                            SEAT 16C REQUESTED MANN/C KAY(IDS8C061MR102

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES  09JAN WASHINGTON DC  HOUSTON TX     500P    722P
CO 1459    H          TUE   R REAGAN NAT   G.BUSH INTERCO
                            TERMINAL B     TERMINAL C
                            SNACK                         NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         3:22 DURATION
                  AIRCRAFT: MCDONNELL DOUGLAS ALL MD-80 SERIES
                            SEAT 09D REQUESTED MANN/C KAY(IDS8C061MR102

RESERVATION NUMBER(S)  CO/OH407D

MANN/C KAY  S8C061MR1020

CO  FREQUENT FLYER COHG770475
ASSISTANT: SUZANNE ADAMS 713 853-7340
*******************************************
INTL TVLRS: CARRY SOS WALLET CARD W/ENRONASSISTANCE INFO
CALL SOS MEDICAL EMERGENCY:IN U.S 800 523-6586
CALL SOS MEDICAL EMERGENCY:INTL 215 245-4707 (COLLECT)
*********************************************
Regards,
Diana Fitzgerald
Travel Agency In the Park
713-860-1152 - direct line
713-650-7000


please print
----- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 01/26/2001 12:05 PM -----

	Amanda Huble@ENRON
	01/24/2001 01:02 PM

		 To: Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Richard
Tomaski/Corp/Enron@Enron, Laura Luce/Corp/Enron@Enron, Julie A
Gomez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank W Vickers/NA/Enron@Enron, Jonathan
McKay/CAL/ECT@ECT, Tim Heizenrader/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A
Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Fundamental Newsletters


I'm leaving now!  Teresa, Larry, Lillian, Irene and I have closed down for a few days.  We've satisfied all the demands of the bankruptcy attorneys, and Dan Lyons and Travis McCullough -  no mean feat!

I'm hoping to be out until Thursday, but I'll check my email and voicemail on Wednesday and come in if necessary.  Home number: 713 528-0232.

Ho!Ho!Ho!
Kate

Kate B. Cole
Director, Corporate Services
Enron Corp.
Tel: (713) 853-1624
Fax: (713) 646-8007
Email: kate.cole@enron.com


Just wanted to share the list of "one-page" bios and summary statements
that I have collected to this point.  I have two more yet to come and will
share them ASAP.  Have a great weekend and I look forward to seeing
everyone in "sunny/warm Waco" next week.

By the way, Bill Petty has challenged everyone to a 40 minute jog along the
river on Friday morning at 6:45 a.m. so bring your jogging gear.  I also
have heard from very reliable sources that Bennett Stewart is the odds on
favorite to "win the race" (Cynthia leaked the story that he's been in
training now for several months).

I'll also be sending you driving/parking, etc. instructions early next week.

Have a great weekend,

John

 - Bennett_Stewart.doc
 - David Palumbo current Bio.doc
 - G_Ferrell.doc
 - IVaysmanBiosketch.doc
 - JMartinBiosketch.doc
 - korpi_bio_plus_views_v2.doc
 - M_Froehls.doc
 - Srivastava New Econ.rtf

John D. Martin
Carr P. Collins Chair in Finance
Finance Department
Baylor University
PO Box 98004
Waco, TX 76798
254-710-4473 (Office)
254-710-1092 (Fax)
J_Martin@Baylor.edu
web:    http://hsb.baylor.edu/html/martinj/home.html


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Enron Holiday - Risk working day

Date:		12/26/2000
Time:		8:00 AM - 9:00 AM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Please mark on your calendars to attend given current discussions about the
gas organization.

Regards
Delainey

---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 10/10/2000
10:12 AM ---------------------------

David W Delainey
10/10/2000 10:12 AM
To: Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim
Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas A
Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, W David Duran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Donahue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT, Max Yzaguirre/NA/Enron@ENRON,
C John Thompson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott Josey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Brian
Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean Mrha/NA/Enron@Enron, David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph Deffner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Beth Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Wes
Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: 2000 ENA Offsite

Guys, please mark your calendars for the 2000 ENA Management Offsite
scheduled for December 14th and 15th at the Venetian in Las Vegas.  We
envision people flying in the afternoon/evening of December 13th with the
offsite being held on December 14th and 15th.  Departure would occur the
morning of December 16th.  It is important that everyone stays for the entire
period including Friday night.  Jeff Skilling and Greg Whalley have taken
time out their schedule to speak to us on Thursday and Friday night about
Enron Corps strategy and our eCommerce/Networks strategy respectively.

A complete agenda will follow shortly.

Dorie Hitchcock will manage all the logistics.

Regards
Delainey


John Sherriff's asst has moved the meeting.  I hope this is still possible
for you.

Steve
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven Leppard/LON/ECT on 09/11/2000
08:05 ---------------------------

Lauren Urquhart
07/11/2000 09:16
To: Steven Leppard/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Thursday instead Friday

Hi Steve

Steve, the research meeting has been moved to Thursday at 3.00pm.

Can you please let Vince know.

Thanks.

Lauren


Great!  I look forward to our dinner on Thurs. 12/7 evening.  Hopefully your
flight will be on time... although having watched 60 minutes last night and
suffered from a # of delays lately, let's hope that the "weather blame"
doesn't get in the way.  It's best to leave me a message @ my usual work #
on Thurs., 914 253 4187, ... I can easily check it in Houston.

I'll be staying @ the Westin Oaks in The Galleria... any preferred place
that I can book (& for what time)??  Coming over to down town won't be a
problem for me either.

Will be great to see you again.
Soussan
914 253 4187

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com [mailto:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, November 27, 2000 12:10 PM
To: faizs@texaco.com
Cc: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
Subject: Re: Houston visit

Soussan,

Thanks for your message. It would be great to meet you when you come to
Houston.
 I shall be in town on December 7,  flying back from Philly in the morning.
Assuming that the flight is on schedule, I shall be available for dinner.
Please, let me know how I can contact you on Thursday, December the 7th,
to confirm.

Look forward to meeting you.

Vince

"Faiz, Soussan" <faizs@texaco.com> on 11/26/2000 09:04:01 PM

To:   "'Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  Houston visit

Dear Vince,

Greetings from NY and hope that all is well and you had a great
Thanksgiving.  I'll be coming to Houston for 12/6-12/7 and hope you are
available either evening for dinner.  Would be great to see you again and
catch up with the latest... I really enjoyed my visit last April, your
insights, and the risk book you gave me.

I do hope you're available to meet and pls let me know which evening suits
you better.

Best,
Soussan Faiz
Texaco Inc.
914 253 4187


the file you sent is password protected.  send new file or password.


Jacques,

The agreement looks fine.   My only comment is that George and Larry might
object to the language that "the bank that was requested to finance the
construction of the project declined to make the loan based on the high costs
of the construction of the Project".   Technically, that bank lowered the
loan amount based on lower estimates of rents which altered the amount of
equity that would be required.

Did I loan them $1,300,000?  I thought it was less.

Regarding Exhibit A, the assets include:  the land, architectural plans,
engineering completed, appraisal, and soils study.   Most of these items are
in a state of partial completion by the consultants.  I have been speaking
directly to the architect, engineer, and soils engineer.   I am unclear on
what is the best way to proceed with these consultants.

The obligations should include the fees owed to the consultants above.  Do we
need to list balances due or just list the work completed as an asset  and
give consideration of $5,875 for the cash paid to the engineer and appraisor.

Phillip


Please find attached a list of the contact information for the business and
legal people who will be working on completing the transaction between Enron
and ECO.

From ECOutlook, I will be helping to coordinate our legal and due diligence
efforts. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or other
issues related to the transaction.

Shortly, we will also be sending Enron a due diligence request list related
to Enron's technology and current ECPower system.

Looking forward to working together to close this exciting transaction.

Jocelynn

 <<Enron_ECO Distribution List 09JAN01.doc>>

 - Enron_ECO Distribution List 09JAN01.doc


How is CINCPAC reshaping security arrangements in the Asia-Pacific?
How, if at all, should the U.S. engage North Korea, Cuba, Iran, and Iraq?
How does the rest of the world view Bill Clinton's legacy?
Does Fidel Castro worry about his own legacy?
What is the regional impact of the AIDS pandemic?
Has the U.S. economy really been globalized?

Find the answers in the Winter 2000-2001 issue of The Washington Quarterly,
now available on-line at www.twq.com

In this issue:
Provocations
From Wheels to Webs: Reconstructing Asia-Pacific Security Arrangements
    -- Dennis C. Blair and John T. Hanley Jr.
Fear Moves East: Terror Targets the Pacific Rim
    Joshua Kurlantzick
As Fidel Fades   Georgie Anne Geyer
The Fundamental Internet Tax Debate  Murray Weidenbaum
Has the U.S. Economy Really Been Globalized?-- Robert M. Dunn Jr.

Containment's Last Stand
The Politcs of Dismantling Containment  Meghan L. O'Sullivan
North Korea: The Leader of the Pack-- Joel S. Wit
Cuba: The End of an Era-- Daniel W. Fisk
Iran: Can the United States Do a Deal?-- Geoffrey Kemp
Iraq: The Exception to the Rule-- Judith S. Yaphe

What is Clinton's International Legacy?
Clinton's World: Purpose, Policy and Weltanschauung  Josef Joffe
The Eye of the the Transitional Storm  Shahram Chubin
Legacy to the World's Poorest Nations  Michael Chege
The Asian Legacy in Focus  Frank Ching
As Clinton Leaves the Ring  Yasuhiro Nakasone

The Regional Impact of HIV and AIDS
Joinign Forces to Fight HIV and AIDS  Sandra L. Thurman
The African Pandemic Hits Washington  J. Stephen Morrison
Accelerating and Disseminating across Asia  Chris Beyrer
Caribbean Crossroads  Peggy McEvoy

Charles Cook on Washington
The End of Politics? Looking Beyond the Election
Charles E. Cook Jr.

All articles are available in full text at www.twq.com


Jeff:

I am sending you a business plan for a financial SettlementMatrix.  This is a
marketplace that will handle all payments, settlements and risk/arbitrage
associated with B2B marketplaces.

I would like to discuss the potential for Enron to participate as an equity
owner in SettlementMatrix.  We are moving this very rapidly.  I will discuss
this with you when we talk on Wednesday.

Regards,
Greg

(See attached file: SettlementMatrix Business Plan--v3.4.zip)

 - SettlementMatrix Business Plan--v3.4.zip


Start Date: 1/11/02; HourAhead hour: 23;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011123.txt


here is our update.  i think we should have this adequately documented by
Monday night.

  ----- Forwarded by Linda Robertson/NA/Enron on 04/15/2001 10:43 PM -----

	Sarah Novosel
	04/13/2001 06:05 PM

		 To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: BENEFITS OF OPEN ACCESS - EXPANSION OF SUPPLY

Linda:

Attached are some examples of ways in which open access will help increase
supply.  It's a work in progress, but here are my initial thoughts.

Also, Jim and I spoke with Tabors and Pickle and got clarification on the
numbers we used in making the point that supply will increase with open
access.   They said that the 2-5 percent works in the east (AEP) but they
would like to be more conservative in the west (1-3 percent increase in
supply).  This still results in an increase of supply on any given day of
1,350 - 4,050 of MW.  I made this change to the "Examples" page but we'll
need to make a similar change to the Lay paper.

Call me this weekend if you need me (202) 466-9160.

Sarah

	James D Steffes
	04/13/2001 05:43 PM

		 To: Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: BENEFITS OF OPEN ACCESS - EXPANSION OF SUPPLY

HERE ARE SOME OTHER THOUGHTS TO MAYBE WORK IN OVER THE COMING DEBATES --

There are real supply benefits from open access.

First, reliability is increased.   Historically, utilities shared reserves
only with adjoining systems.  Open access allows sharing of reserves,
especially replacement reserves, over a broader market.

Second, open access increases the productivity of the current generation
portfolio.  Barriers to moving power to where it is needed allows less costly
generation to sit idle.  In addition, open access reduces the generation
capacity requirements of the overall system.  Instead of local utilities
building for their needs, open access allows remote generation to reliably
serve local needs.  The result is that lower capacity is required as more
energy is served out of the same quantity of capacity, resulting in long-term
efficiency.

Third, open access should improve the utilization of the current transmission
network.  In the natural gas context, pipeline open access has allowed for
transported volumes nearly quadrupling since 1985.


So what time did you end up getting home on Saturday night.  I was absolutely
demolished on Sunday and left the house only to come down and pick up my car
which was at the Embassy Suites?  Did ya have fun?


one more thing - these numbers are leaving the Texas approved budget numbers
alone and not changing them; have a good weekend - Eric

===========

----- Forwarded by Eric Benson/NA/Enron on 04/20/2001 05:04 PM -----

	Eric Benson
	04/20/2001 05:00 PM

		 To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: budget savings no rcr

Rick -

here is the budget savings taking out the rcr for your review

Eric


Amy, this is way late, so sorry.  I suggest running it by the HR leadership
team.  The email list can be obtained from Gerry Gibson at corp.  If there
are HR openings, and she would be interested, they would most probably be the
best people to assess her skills.  Thanks.  Michelle

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Amy Gambill @ ENRON                           09/27/2000 09:57 AM

To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Debra Ruby's Resume

Michelle,
Thanks so much for the feedback on Debra's resume.  Ted and I also shared it
with Brian Schaffer who said he would potentially like to have her in his
group, but has no openings right now.  You'd mentioned in your e-mail that
there may be HR possibilites for her and she's expressed an interest in
exploring that kind of a career move (see below).  Do you know of something
specific or anyone else I should share her resume with?

I really appreciate your help!
Amy
---------------------- Forwarded by Amy Gambill/Corp/Enron on 09/27/2000
09:54 AM ---------------------------

Glebeplace@aol.com on 09/26/2000 07:54:58 PM
To: Amy.Gambill@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Re: Debra Ruby's Resume

Thank you so much for circulating my resume and for forwarding the positive
feedback to me.  As a matter of fact, I am very interested in exploring the
possibility of a transition from a Legal Department position to a  Human
Resources position.  Even though there may not be an opening at this time, it
would still be very interesting to speak with someone who has made this
career change.
Thank you again,  Debra


See ya in el lobbyo at noon

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Lynn Aven/ENRON@enronXgate
	04/19/2001 10:42 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Lunch

How about noon?

Lynn

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Shackleton, Sara
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 10:22 AM
To: Aven, Lynn
Subject: Re: Lunch

Yes, I'm available.  What time works for you? I'd rather go after 111:45.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Lynn Aven/ENRON@enronXgate 04/19/2001 09:45 AM 	   To: Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT  cc:   Subject: Re: Lunch

 Sara:  Are you still on for lunch today?  Where do they have good tunnel of
fudge downtown?  If you are available, let me know time and I will meet you
in the lobby of the Enron Building.

 Lynn


Just to keep you up-to-date on the progress we've made with your system access - After a few failed attempts to "clone" Ryan Slinger's account and copy it over to your user ID, I've gone ahead and requested all the applications and drives you'll need through the IT website. I believe Bill also requested a few things, so you should be set.

When you work next, will you please check your access to Enpower (Deal Entry, Deal Scheduling, Reports - CARP, SAR, Real Time Position Manager) as well as the m:drive (El Paso Model)? I've received e-mails back from my IT requests saying they've been granted, so if you are still denied access, we'll have to pursue a different line of questioning.

Please e-mail me with your results Thursday night.

Thanks,
Kate

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cox, Chip
Sent:	Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:23 AM
To:	Steiner, David; Symes, Kate
Subject:	RE: Access for new Real Time trader: John Anderson

I did the do the cloning process for John Anderson and this time it didn't work. It's worked for other users but I'm not sure why it didn't work this time. I need to have a list of items that John needs so I can individually request and add to his account. I'll work with Kate to get his account updated.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steiner, David
Sent:	Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:19 AM
To:	Symes, Kate; Cox, Chip
Subject:	RE: Access for new Real Time trader: John Anderson

Chip,
	You were going to clone this, is it done?

Dave

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Symes, Kate
Sent:	Monday, July 23, 2001 8:26 AM
To:	Cox, Chip
Cc:	Steiner, David
Subject:	Access for new Real Time trader: John Anderson

Has there been any progress on creating a profile for our new trader, John Anderson? I know you had copied Ryan Slinger's profile over to get him access to all the necessary applications, but I just heard from Bill that as of this morning John (aka Casey) was still unable to access Enpower and the M:drive. Could you let me know when you get a moment today how this is going?

Thanks,
Kate


Tentative
In Saunders office
Discuss project finanical control procedures, and other operations admin.
accounting items; as time permits


No need to hold off.  I'm not worried about GE.

I need Dave to sign one more document.  Is he around?

How do you like your new digs?

Kay

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jacoby, Ben
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 12:32 PM
To:	Mann, Kay
Subject:	FW: NorthWestern

Kay:

Do you want to continue to hold off on the wire until the letter gets signed? FYI, Louise has given the OK to the wire.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	stephen.swift@ps.ge.com@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 12:17 PM
To:	Mann, Kay; mike.barnas@ps.ge.com
Cc:	Jacoby, Ben; john.schroeder@ps.ge.com
Subject:	RE: NorthWestern

Kay,

The letter looks fine.  Please address the letter to Jeff Darst 1 River Road
Building 36-3E Schenectady, 12345 with a copy to me.

Jeff's fax is 518-381-1513.

Let me know if you need anything else.

Thanks,

Steve Swift

-----Original Message-----
From: Mann, Kay [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 6:17 PM
To: Swift, Stephen L (PS, CommOps); mike.barnas@ps.ge.com
Cc: Jacoby, Ben
Subject: NorthWestern

Gentlemen,

Pursuant to my discussion with Mr. Swift, I am enclosing a draft letter
for your review.

Kay

 <<Lttr to Steve re consent.DOC>>

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/01/2000
05:25 PM ---------------------------

"Btu" <subs@btu.net> on 12/01/2000 05:18:52 PM
To: "Btu Weekly" <>
cc:
Subject: Btu Weekly

Attached is the latest issue of Btu Weekly.

e-mail: info@Btu.net
phone: 732-758-8222
fax: 732-758-8286

 - wg120400.pdf


Start Date: 4/29/01; HourAhead hour: 7;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042907.txt


Should this deal be extended?

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 01/22/2000 10:55
PM ---------------------------

Brenda H Fletcher
01/14/2000 02:59 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Deal # 124250 -Norse Pipeline

Chris,
Does this deal end 11/30/99 or should the stop date be extended?
Thanks,
Brenda


Have fun with this!


I think we need an internal review to develop responses to positions as
outlined in PT's memo.

Kay

From: Sheila Tweed@ECT on 05/15/2001 04:22 PM
To: John G Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Scott Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Kay
Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, John
Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Re: World Hunger Rev 4a- JR

My prior email was written before I read this and it seems like everyone is
geared up for the call with GE tomorrow.  I'm OK with proceeding if everyone
thinks we can resolve some stuff.

	John G Rigby@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	05/15/2001 03:03 PM

		 To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Scott
Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ed B
Hearn III/HOU/ECT@ECT, pthompson@akllp.com
		 cc: John Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Scott
Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 Subject: World Hunger Rev 4a- JR

  I took several assignments from the last World Hunger call.  Status as
follows:

a.   Tax language-  I have sent a prior version of Rev 4 jr to Matt G asking
him to call me to let me know when he can talk with GE tax rep.  Steve Swifit
and I are in London and would like to sit in on that call.

b.   Insurance Language review.   I sent same version to David Marshall and
Paul Parrish asking for their reviews and opinion as to whether 7FA's are new
technology.

c.   I "volunteered" to look at the termination language in world hunger, GE
had some problems, and I had the same problem with the ARCOs contract.   I
drafted a fix last Friday, sent to Kay M for comment.  I have included my
suggested changes in the attached redline.  I have forwarded same fix to GE
at end Friday for Arcos.    I have asked Kay if she still has a concern with
the Limit of Liability as it relates to termination.  I think it works.

d.  I "volunteered" to work over Article 10, Exhibit B-3 and Exhibit B-6 in
relation to Guarantees and liquidated damages.  I have done that in the
attached redline of the T&C and Exhibits.

e. Some time ago I volunteered to resurrect the language associated with the
reduction in the LD refund in Section 10.9.8.   I had sent out a couple weeks
ago but received no reaction.    I have entered that fix in the attached
redline.

f.  I have made several minor changes to definitions associated with
performance.

Attached is Rev4-JR version of GE T&C's and Exhibits for world hunger.  They
start from the clean rev 4 version of the T&Cs that Peter forwarded to me at
my request.  The attached are redlined to show my changes.

I have not sent any of this to GE except for the termination language fix.
I suggest that the Enron team give these a quick read before the World hunger
call.  I can print same here and share with GE during the call unless there
is an objection.

I hope this will help to advance the process.  My earlier emails to Paul and
Matt were not intended confuse the situation with different drafts.  Please
ignore those and for the above purposes use the attached files.

Kay- I suggest that you forward to others who you feel appropriate for the
purposes of the world hunger call on Wednesday.


I have looked it over.  I think they would do a good job.  Another idea:
Dick Foster (advisor to Enron's Board and Senior Director at McKinsey) has a
great book out: "Creative Destruction".  I was on a panel with him recently
where he shared some of his research.  He is a very good presenter; he knows
Enron well; and his work is first rate.  He might be a good addition.  I have
an idea on the breakout sessions.  It needs some work but I'd like to talk it
through with you.

TERRIE JAMES@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
07/05/2001 01:09 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Funky Business

Steve,

Have you had a chance to look at the book "Funky Business" and to give any
thought to having Jonas present at the Management Conference?  I know you
have a thousand other things on your plate, not the least of which is
California, so I understand if the answer is no.  However, they've been
contacted by someone else about the date so we may be forced to decide rather
soon.

On a related subject, I'm contemplating another topic for the conference.
I'd seen an article in Fortune several months ago titled "Managing for the
Slowdown."  It talked about new challenges managers face in light of the
economic downturn.  (Most young managers have never experienced anything but
boom times.)  The article also outlines a dozen or so things companies should
be thinking about now.  (Use the downturn as a new opportunity to evaluate
people.  Overhaul your budget process.  Don't stop communicating. etc.)  I
think it would be beneficial to address similar strategies and ideas with our
managers.  I'd love to get your thoughts on this idea.  (Is it appropriate
for Enron or am I just seeing the world through bleak-colored glasses?)

Terrie James
Sr. Director, Corporate Communication
Enron Broadband Services
713-853-7727 (phone)
713-646-8887 (fax)
terrie_james@enron.net
----- Forwarded by Terrie James/Enron Communications on 07/05/01 12:44 PM
-----

	Alison@isbspeakers.com
	07/05/01 10:40 AM

		 To: Terrie James/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: Funky Business

 July 5, 2001

 Terrie:

 We received an e-mail today from the Funky Business office asking about the
 date we have on hold with Enron.  They have another inquiry about that date
and
 wondered if Enron is still considering using Jonas.  If you are still
 considering them I will keep him on hold.  And if they get a firm offer I
will
 let you know immediately.  We will have 24 hours to make an offer or release
 the hold once a firm offer comes in from another company.

 Hope you had a great 4th of July,

 Alison Kravetz
 800-842-4483 x239


Julie,

Further to our conversation, please see the attached GISB draft for your
review.

Regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


-----Original Message-----
From:  "Hobson, W. Frank" <Frank.Hobson@ElPaso.com>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Hobson+2C+20W+2E+20Frank+22+20+3CFrank+2EHobson+40ElPaso
+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 1:38 PM
To: Miller, Stephanie
Subject: Agency Form

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender.
******************************************************************
 - EPNG Agency Agmt Auth 10 2000.doc


Brian:  Please see last two entries.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ryan, Ted
Sent:	Friday, May 11, 2001 10:54 AM
To:	Schick, Warren
Cc:	Schwieger, Jim
Subject:	FW: BAMMEL AD VALORUM TAX

I would like to meet with you Monday to address this issue.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Schwieger, Jim
Sent:	Friday, May 11, 2001 8:29 AM
To:	Ryan, Ted
Cc:	Redmond, Brian
Subject:	FW: BAMMEL AD VALORUM TAX

Ted:  Please respond to Brian's question on when the Ad Val Tax is paid.  Please "cc" me on your answer also.

	Thanks,  Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Redmond, Brian
Sent:	Thursday, May 10, 2001 6:11 PM
To:	Schwieger, Jim; Colwell, Wes; Coffey, James; Ryan, Ted
Cc:	Martin, Thomas A.
Subject:	RE: BAMMEL AD VALORUM TAX

When is this tax due?  If it is paid at the end of the year - it is 100% for the account of AEP.

Brian

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Schwieger, Jim
Sent:	Thursday, May 10, 2001 4:34 PM
To:	Redmond, Brian; Colwell, Wes; Coffey, James; Ryan, Ted
Cc:	Martin, Thomas A.; Schwieger, Jim
Subject:	BAMMEL AD VALORUM TAX

As we draw near to the HPL transfer to AEP on June 1, I wanted to remind everyone about the Bammel Ad Valorum Tax.  As we discussed earlier this year the Tax needs to be split between Enron and AEP based on the number of months ownership during the year.  Since the actual liability is not likely to be known until August or September
I assume both parties will have to reach agreement as to how to handle this matter.


I spoke with Donna Bobbish this morning about Steve's question -- does the
President have broader authority to take action during times of crisis.
Donna sent me this quick write up about what she has looked into so far.
Because these questions go beyond a FERC practitioner's expertise, we asked
Donna to work with a Constitutional Law expert at V&E to determine whether,
and under what circumstances, the President's authority may be extended
beyond the authorities discussed in the memo.

We will let you know what we learn from that further research.

Sarah

----- Forwarded by Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron on 05/23/2001 03:48 PM -----

	"Bobbish, Donna J." <dbobbish@velaw.com>
	05/23/2001 12:16 PM

		 To: "'snovose@enron.com'" <snovose@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Presidential Power Question

Sarah:  In response to Steve's inquiry, I did look into this question
briefly when you first gave me the assignment.  I read an interesting law
review article  on "The Imposition of Martial Law in the United States," for
a discussion of presidential powers.  There is no general emergency
authority granted the President in the U.S.  Constitution.  Also, the
article discussed the famous "Truman steel mills case," Youngstown Sheet &
Tube Co. v. Sawyer, 343 U.S. 579 (1952), in which the Supreme Court declared
unconstitutional President Truman's seizure of the steel mills during the
Korean War.  In that case, in light of a threatened national-wide strike in
the national steel industry, President Truman, concerned about the national
defense, issued an Executive Order directing the Secretary of Commerce to
take possession of most of the steel mills and keep them running.  The
Supreme Court said that if the President had authority to take such  an
action, he had to derive it either from an act of Congress or the
Constitution itself.  Since the Supreme Court could not find any seizure
authority, it invalidated the President's action.  The Supreme Court also
rejected the argument that the President had any powers that could be
implied from the aggregate of his powers under the Constitution.

Based on the Truman steel mills case, I thought it the wiser course of
action to look for specific authorities given to the President by statute
which might prove useful.

I could look into this question further, if you would like, but we would be
entering "martial law-type" legal territory, where the President would be
acting outside of specific Constitutional or congressional authority (which
has been described a "zone of twilight"), and in light of the Truman steel
mills case, I don't know how fruitful that might be.

Please let me know if you would like me to do anything more.  Thank you.
Donna
          ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.  This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system.  Thank You


Shirley,

Please, remind me about making arrangements for this trip later this week.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/11/2000
09:40 AM ---------------------------

"Piazze, Thomas" <piazzet@wharton.upenn.edu> on 04/05/2000 02:47:10 PM
To: "'Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: Test

Vince:  My schedule indicates that should be a good day to be on campus, so
let's plan for it.

Please forward to me those brief topic write-ups you promised so that I can
schedule appropriate faculty to meet with you.

Thanks.

TOM

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com [SMTP:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2000 11:08 AM
> To: piazzet@wharton.upenn.edu
> Cc: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com; Shirley.Crenshaw@enron.com
> Subject: RE: Test
>
>
> Tom,
>
> The conference in New York is held on  May 18 and May 19. I can visit
> Wharton
> the day before.
>
> Vince Kaminski
>
>
>
>
> "Piazze, Thomas" <piazzet@wharton.upenn.edu> on 04/05/2000 08:40:55 AM
>
> To:   "'Vince J Kaminski'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
> cc:
> Subject:  RE: Test
>
>
> Vince:  I enjoyed talking with you yesterday and look forward to receiving
> information relative to your visit to campus.
>
> TOM PIAZZE
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:   Vince J Kaminski [SMTP:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
> > Sent:   Tuesday, April 04, 2000 4:52 PM
> > To:     piazzet@wharton.upenn.edu
> > Subject:     Test
> >
> >
> >
> > Test
> >
>
>
>


Kevin,

Please, talk to Jeff Shankman's secretary about including all the Research
Group members on
the 31st floor  in the company provided lunches (when they are available).

If an additional  lunch is needed from time to time, it's fine, but it should
be seen as a something done
under exceptional circumstances.

Vince

Kevin G Moore
12/20/99 12:10 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley
Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Daily Lunches

Hi Vince ,
It has been brought to my attention that several
members of the Weather Team may require a
lunch from time to time.
The person right now is Trisha Tlapek she
has to be at her desk .
Please , could  I provide  daily lunches for her.

                                             Thanks
                                         Kevin Moore


These are the events that took place concerning the New York Customer Holiday Event:

In order to reserve rooms for the first weekend in NY at the Four Seasons, I have to book no later than 9 months out.
To hold these rooms, a contract had to be signed and a $15,000 deposit sent.  The contract allowed us to cancel the entire event by the end of July with no penalty and the deposit was fully refundable.
In speaking with Dave Duran and Frank Vickers in May, they wanted to proceed with this event. ( Attached is a memo that I sent to Frank Vickers outlining the cancellation policy.)
The cost estimate went through several revisions and the final was sent to you for your approval in July.
After the approval form was rejected, I spoke with Dave Duran and he was planning to revise his guest list and re-submit the approval form.
I talked to both Frank and Dave numerous times and reminded them of the hotel penalty issues and had not heard back from either one until I received an e-mail on September 20th from Frank canceling his portion of the trip.
I called my Four Seasons national sales rep and she is working with NY in canceling the contract and minimizing the hotel liquidated damages.  I should have an answer from her no later than tomorrow.

Please let me know if you would like to discuss this in more detail.
Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Tuesday, September 25, 2001 1:37 PM
To:	Hitchcock, Dorie
Subject:	New York

As I never approved this, I just wondered if the rumours were true that we did spend money on this trip.

Let me know

Thanks

Louise


Approve.

From: Gary P Smith/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/16/2001 04:21 PM
To: Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: FW: PAA's for Project Team

Stan,
Attached below are four PAAs for employees in Steve Hotte's organization who
worked on the P-Gas project.  Steve discussed these with both you and I.
Three of the four are for $3,000 each (the other is for $1,000).  Typically
your approval has been requested for PAAs greater than $2,000.  Please reply
by email if you approve this request.
Gary

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Laura Kinningham
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 3:34 PM
To: Gary P Smith
Cc: Brian Schaffer
Subject: FW: PAA's for Project Team

Gary, per our discussion this morning, these are the PAA request forms for
the completion of the P-Gas project in IT.

---------------------- Forwarded by Laura Kinningham/OTS/Enron on 05/10/2001
10:25 AM ---------------------------
From: Steve Hotte/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/09/2001 03:20 PM
To: Laura Kinningham/OTS/Enron@Enron
cc: Michael Sullivan/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: FW: PAA's for Project Team

Approved, per our discussion.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Sullivan, Michael
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 2:49 PM
To: Stern, Ellis; Kinningham, Laura; Hotte, Steve
Subject: PAA's for Project Team

Please approve and forward to Laura Kinningham.   Laura, would like to
deliver on or about May 31.

Ellis will approve Robin's and has agreed to fund her award from Rod's pool.
Ellis please forward your CC number with your approval.

Steve will approve Jeff, Molly and Sandy's.

Jeff
Molly

Sandy

Robin


The following SAP ID and Password allows you to access pay, benefit, and
personal data via eHROnline.  Do NOT provide this ID/Password to anyone as it
enables modification to direct deposit account information.

The SAP system AND eHROnline will be available beginning
FRIDAY, JUNE 23 at 8:00 AM for TIME ENTRY.
Full SAP functionality for financials will be available on July 5, 2000.

You will be asked to change your password at the initial logon.  Your NEW
password should meet the following criteria:
Must be 6-8 characters long
Can include numbers and letters
Can NOT include 'enron' in your password.
The system will require you to change your password every 90 days.

The following address will connect you to eHRonline beginning FRIDAY, JUNE 23
at 8:00AM,  http://eHRonline.enron.com
(Must use Internet Explorer, version 4.01 or higher to access this link.)

How do I get help?:

SAP Support:
Call the COE SAP Hotline at 713-345-4SAP (4727).

For Quick Reference Tools, Security Request Processes, after hours contact
information and other general information, go to the COE web site via
Internet Explorer using the following URL address:
http://sap.enron.com/coe

For Troubleshooting and Go-Live Tips, go to the following web site, via
Internet Explorer, using the following URL address:
http://sap.enron.com/coe
Click on SAP, then click on Troubleshooting and Go-Live Tips

Training:
Contact your site manager if you were not able to attend a SAP training
class, and would like to attend one,
 for approval and role assignment.

For interactive web based training for eHRonline time entry, go to the
following web site, via Internet Explorer,
using the following URL address:
http://www.enroncast.com/docentlm/docent_lm_login.html
Select the "New Users Click Here to Register" link


Please fill out the attached form to ensure that all applications required by
you are installed on your machine when it is coreloaded with GE software.
Note that some of these applications will require that you leave the software
for IT at your workstation the evening or weekend that your machine is
scheduled to be loaded.  These applications are underlined on the list.  If
the software is not left for us, we can not load it, due to software
licensing issues.  Additionally, there are a few specialty applications that
you will be expected to load on your own.  These applications are italicized
on the list.  We do, however, request that you check the box next to them as
we need to keep track of licensing.

Please submit one copy of the completed form to Leonard Ruiz via interoffice
mail.  Please tape a copy of the completed form to the side of your computer
monitor.  This is necessary as the machine name does not always match the
user name.

An installation schedule will be distributed shortly.  We must have this form
before we load your PC.

I would like to take this opportunity to remind you that any data that you
leave on your local hard drive will be erased when we coreload your machine.
Don't forget to move all data you wish to save up to the network.

Thank you for your cooperation.

--D


Man, I did sound a little testy--due to my own inability to remember which one of those stupid FERC acronyms is which.  df

From:	Kathy Ringblom/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/07/2001 08:04 AM
To:	Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject:	RE:

My, we sound a bit testy, don't we?  Anyway, here's Kern River's FT rates:

Fifteenth Revised Sheet No. 5 : Effective
Superseding: Fourteenth Revised Sheet No. 5
                             STATEMENT OF RATES
                RATE SCHEDULES KRF-1, CH-1, UP-1, MO-1, SH-1
                              (RATES PER DTH)

The rates shown below are those rates which Transporter is authorized to
charge 1/ for service rendered from the effective date through the fifteenth
(15th) year after commencement of operations.

                                   Base
                                  Tariff       Surcharges       Rate After
                                   Rate       ACA       GRI     Surcharges
                                  -------   -------   -------   -----------
Monthly Reservation/Demand Rate: 1/

   Maximum Over 50% L.F.         $17.7200              $0.2000     $17.9200
           50% L.F. and Under    $17.7200              $0.1230     $17.8430
   Minimum                        $0.0000              $0.0000      $0.0000

Daily Reservation/Demand Rate: 1/

   Maximum Over 50% L.F.         $0.5826               $0.0066      $0.5892
           50% L.F. and Under    $0.5826               $0.0040      $0.5866
   Minimum                       $0.0000               $0.0000      $0.0000

Firm Transportation Commodity/Usage Rate: 1/

   Maximum                       $0.0573    $0.0022    $0.0072      $0.0667
   Minimum                       $0.0023    $0.0022    $0.0000      $0.0045

Authorized Overrun Rate: 1/

   Maximum                       $0.6399    $0.0022    $0.0072      $0.6493
   Minimum                       $0.0023    $0.0022    $0.0000      $0.0045

1/ For invoicing purposes, the rates and surcharges set forth above will be
applied, as appropriate, to a) Shipper's Maximum Daily Quantity ("MDQ") as
stated in the Transportation Service Agreement and b) volumes of gas received
by Transporter from Shipper for transportation after such MDQ and volumes of
gas received are multiplied by the current Thermal Conversion Factor as
defined in the General Terms and Conditions of this Tariff ("Thermal
Conversion Factor").  The current Thermal Conversion Factor is 1.047 Dth per
Mcf.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Fossum, Drew
Sent:	Tuesday, March 06, 2001 5:09 PM
To:	Ringblom, Kathy
Subject:

Pls get on cips rims or whatever the hell it is and get Kern's max tariff rate for FT.  I'm getting convinced that the Kern neg. rate deal will feature prominantly in our defense.  DF


Dear Eric Bass,

Thank you for shopping with 1-800-FLOWERS.COM.

The gift you selected Dozen Daisies In Vase, will be delivered to Shanna on
11/21/00.

Below is a summary of your order :

Recipient :
Shanna Husser at:
Enron
1400 Smith
Houston, TX 77002

Order Summary :
Order number is 561601300.
Product : Dozen Daisies In Vase :    39.99
Service Charge        :    7.99
Tax(where applicable) :    3.96
Total Charge          :   51.94

If you have any questions, please feel to email us at
custservice@1800flowers.com, visit our online customer service chat, or call
our customer service department toll-free at 1-800-468-1141.

Sincerely,

Meredith McArdle
Director of Customer Services
1-800-FLOWERS.COM

Complete the Feast this Thanksgiving with a special treat or pretty
centerpiece from 1-800-FLOWERS.COM.  If you can't be there for dinner, send
the perfect gift!  Click here to see our Thanksgiving Collection of
complete-the-feast gifts.

http://www.1800flowers.com/cgi-bin/800f/collection.pl/psmg/17/0/0/0/0/0


eSource presents free Dow Jones Interactive training

Introduction to Dow Jones Interactive
Learn about the content available through Dow Jones Interactive, and how to
quickly put it to work for you. Including setting up your own custom clips
and monitoring topics of interest to you.

June. 8   9:00 - 10:00 AM  EB560

Advanced
Learn how to be more efficient on Dow Jones Interactive.  Put some power
tools to work for you.  Learn how to employ codes, use search history, and
customize.  Hands on time is provided.

   June. 8   10:00 - 11:00 AM  EB560
  June. 8     11:00 - 12:00 AM  EB560

Seats fill up fast! To reserve a seat, please call Stephanie E. Taylor at
5-7928

? No Shows will be charged $50.00

Check the eSource training page at http://esource.enron.com/training.doc for
additional training sessions and vendor presentations

http://esource.enron.com


Happy New Year Dan!

Just checking to verify that you received the order form that I faxed to you
on December 18.  Please confirm.

Also, we brought a bottle of Freestone Hill to Pappas Steak House (on New
Year's Eve) for everyone to try.  The sommeliers raved.

Regards.  Sara

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/05/2001
02:03 PM ---------------------------

Greg Napiorkowski <gnapiorkowski@intertrust.com> on 02/05/2001 12:35:21 PM
To: "'Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: Czesc

Wicku,

Oczywiscie, ze sie spotkam z radoscia i przyjemnoscia.
Sporo czasu minelo od czsu, gdy sie ostatni raz widzielismy.

W gre wchodzi praktycznie czwartek wieczorem.  W srode sie przeprowadzam,
a w piatek lece do NJ o 21:30.

Moj telefon:  408-855-0263.

Na razie,

  Grzegorz

-----Original Message-----
From: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com [mailto:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2001 10:29 AM
To: gnapi@intertrust.com
Cc: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com; vkaminski@aol.com
Subject: Czesc

Grzegorz,

Ludmila doniosla mi, ze pracujesz w Kalifornii.

Bede w Berkeley w srode i w Palo Alto w czwartek i piatek.

Czy masz czas, by spotakc sie na obiad/lunch/kawe?

Pozdrowienia

Wicek


Hi,

How are you?  Seems like we have had a bit of difficulty contacting each
other.  Sorry I missed your call.  I am now in NYC - until December 2nd.

I will try to call you on tomorrow morning about 8 am Houston time.

Take care,
Iris

>From: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
>To: irismmack@hotmail.com
>CC: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
>Subject: Hello
>Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 15:14:31 -0600
>
>Iris,
>
>We are trying to reach you but we are getting error messages.
>Please, call me 713 853 3848.
>
>Vince
>
>

______________________________________________________________________________
_______
Get more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com


I'll call you.
---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 12/11/2000
12:13 PM ---------------------------

Mary Hain
12/11/2000 01:19 PM
To: Christi Nicolay, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe
Hartsoe@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@Enron, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Donna Fulton, Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, steve.c.hall@enron.com, Richard
Sanders, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, James E
Keller/HOU/EES@EES, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron,
Dennis Benevides, Neil Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Jubran Whalan/HOU/EES@EES, Dave
Parquet
cc:

Subject: FERC request for gas prices

Bill Howard from FERC just called me.  The Chairman of FERC is asking for the
following information by the end of the day today:

How much gas did we buy today by basin either: as of the beginning of the day
or as of midnight?
How much of the gas went into California?
What was the average price or the high and low price?

I asked him to if FERC wa asking other market participants.  He said more and
more every day and they would continue this until prices started going down.
I asked him if the Commission intended to keep this information
confidential.  He said he didn't know.  Christi - could you work with Phillip
on this?  Bill's number is (202) 208-1268.


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron on 11/22/2000
11:47 AM ---------------------------

Tod A Lindholm
11/22/2000 11:12 AM
To: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Capital Charge and Calculating Return on Invested Capital

Since ETS has third party debt on it's books, the debt and cost of carry will
be excluded from the calculation so as not to double count.

Rick wants it to actualy be booked.  I lean towards just calculating it and
not actually make entries (I know that entries will cause all sorts of
additional issues).   Nothing has been formalized yet.

Rod Hayslett

11/22/2000 11:01 AM
To: Tod A Lindholm/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: Capital Charge and Calculating Return on Invested Capital

What do we do with debt on the books of the entities?  Ignore it?   And my
understanding is that this will not be used for actual booking of anything
in the books,

Tod A Lindholm
11/22/2000 10:31 AM
To: Wes Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fernley Dyson/LON/ECT@ECT, Kevin
Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, John Echols/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Mark E Lindsey/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Sally
Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kent Castleman/NA/Enron@Enron,
Jeffrey E Sommers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Carol
Howes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Howard Selzer/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Keith Marlow/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dave
Gunther/NA/Enron@Enron, Kenny Bickett/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, MARY
TURINA/ENRON@enronxgate, Barry Schnapper/Corp/Enron@Enron, Paul
Chivers/LON/ECT@ECT, Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeremy Thirsk/SIN/ECT@ECT,
Ananda Mukerji/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Stephen H
Friedlander/EWC/Enron@Enron, Joseph Deffner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry
Derrett/HOU/EES@EES, Kevin Howard/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Michael Anderson/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Bill W Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ben F Glisan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Perkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim DeSpain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jordan Mintz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob
Butts/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES, Mary Lynne
Ruffer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maroun J Abboudy/LON/ECT@ECT, Mike Deville/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Capital Charge and Calculating Return on Invested Capital

Over the last few months, we have been working on a new methodology to
measure and report business unit's retrurns on invested capital.   Several
different variations were considered, and I am glad to report that Skilling,
Causey and Fastow have approved the process outlined here.

Simply stated (with an example shown below):  Return on equity will be
calculated based on a pre-determined debt/equity structure.  Business unit
capital will include both on-balance sheet and off-balance sheet uses of
capital and business unit's will be charged for the cost of their debt at
Enron's cost of funds.  Business unit's should focus on improving their
return on equity over time.

______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________

This metric will not replace other targets (i.e., IBIT and Funds Flow).

We are currently working to overlay this approach to the submitted 2001
Plans.  If you have questions, please contact myself or Mike Deville.


fyi.   Have you talked to Pushkar yet?
---------------------- Forwarded by Shari Stack/HOU/ECT on 03/30/2000 02:18
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Sheila Glover                           03/30/2000 12:37 PM

To: Paul Garcia/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Laurel Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pushkar Shahi/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St
Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: BONY/Chase Bond Settlement Account comparison - Draft

Paul,
Would you please help complete the attached comparison between BONY and Chase
for next Tuesday's meeting with Puskar, at 4:00.

Carol, Shari and Sara,
Who will be attending for Legal?  Laurel said that there is some uncertainty
as to whether Carol was involved in this project.

Thanks.
Sheila


Hello Vince and Shirley,

Thank you so much for your patience as I tried to shuffle dates and events
around!  I have some great news.  I was able to secure a room on campus at
the Faculty Club for the presentation on Monday October 16th at 7:00 - 9:00.
That should work out perfectly as far as being about to present at the
seminar from 3:30 - 5:00.  Furthermore, I was able to adjust the resume drop
dates so that we have through the week of the 16th for students to submit
their resumes.

I will go into more detail about this tomorrow at the Cal Berkeley Team
Meeting.  I have put together some booklets to hand out to the team
tomorrow.  Vince, I have put some time into the agenda for you to welcome the
team and get everyone excited about Cal recruiting this Fall.  Thank you for
all of your help!  Please let me know if there is something that you would
like me to add to the agenda for tomorrow.

Thanks!
Ashley


what are you doing?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Villarreal, Alexandra
Sent:	Friday, October 19, 2001 4:31 PM
To:	Griffith, John
Subject:

in case you didnt notice, i am back


We bought 4385 from CPA (deal 155237) and sold it to CES (deal 155238).

We bought 1249 from CPA (deal 155240) and sold it to EES (deal 155244).

Do the emails help??  Is this the way you guys want ot see this?


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/31/2000
04:08 PM ---------------------------

Tanuja Tulsiani <ttulsi@IIRLTD.CO.UK> on 03/30/2000 04:39:22 AM
To: Ttulsi@IIRLTD.CO.UK
cc:
Subject: Energy in Europe Congress 2000

 Dear Energy in Europe Congress Delegate

ENERGY IN EUROPE CONGRESS 2000
19th June * 22th June 2000 * Kempinski Hotel , Berlin

I am delighted that you will be joining us to speak at our Energy in
Europe2000 conference (formally known as Electricity in Europe Congress) and
enclose copies of the printed brochure for you and your colleagues. I hope
that you will agree that the programme looks excellent and the response so
far indicates that the event will be extremely well attended.

I would be grateful if you could just take a moment to look through the items
we would like from you prior to the conference to help ensure everything runs
smoothly on the day.

Your Administration/Preparation Details
12 weeks to go!

You will find attached:
  ? PINK FORM : please tick and fill in and fax back immediately
? HOTEL FORM: please tick and fill in and fax direct to the hotel
? MARKETING.DOC: Information for out marketing department, please fill in and
send back as soon as possible

Friday 26th May 2000 : A Hard Copy Of Your Documentation
3 weeks to go!

  ? We would like a hard black & white copy of  your presentation / bullet
points/copy of slides whichever is best for you, to insert into the delegate
documentation. We can receive this by post or email if the documents are not
too complex but we try not to insert fax copies as copy quality is poor.
(e-mail address - ttulsi@icbi.co.uk).

N.B. Even if you plan to speak off the cuff, we would urge that you submit at
least an outline of your speech to us for insertion into the delegate pack by
the above date. The most consistent complaint that we have from delegates is
that not all speakers offer hard copies of their presentation.

  ? If you are unable to make this deadline, please could you inform us as
soon as possible so that we can make alternative arrangements and avoid
printing delay.

Under separate cover we have arranged for five brochures to be sent to you
outlining the full programme.  These should arrive very shortly.

Should you have any queries regarding your participation at the conference
please contact Tanuja Tulsiani, our Logistics  Manager who will be looking
after the 'domestic' side of the event. You can call her direct on (44) 171
915 5173 or do contact myself. Thank you once again for joining us and I look
forward to seeing you in the Berlin.

With kind regards,

Alexandra Howells
Director
Energy in Europe Congress 2000

 - hotel form.doc
 - Pink form.doc
 - marketing.doc


Sorry to hear you're having a bad day.  If it helps mine's not much better.
I've been harrassed by at least half the company, I think.  Frank's out of
the office, so I've got Sunil's replacement (who doesn't have a clue) calling
me every two minutes, as well as Vlady calling, and the out of Control group
calling, and Canada calling trying to get their p&l right......it's been
nuts.  I was hoping today would be boring so I could do GMAT homework.  I
would love to get out of the building for a little while.  Some lady just
asked me for directions to get off this floor...  Does this seem scary to
you??  Especially when you consider she was facing the neon EXIT sign down
the hall.  Wow!!  Apparently everyone's lost their mind today.

Hope your day gets better.
Robin


Wow, if Haug spent more time making money than created bull.... in the
company we would be a $100 stock.

On a different note, I was wondering if someone in your shop could map the
current A&A process from planning for on-campus recruitment to manager
promotion  for the typical associate including timeline.  This process
mapping should be very detailed to give us the greatest insight.

I think radical change is not the answer.  The answer lies in a combination
of a) slight changes in process; b) increasing participation/ownership at key
points in the process by certain business units and people; and c) a credible
key business spokesman or spokespersons co-opting the other units where
necessary and providing the commercial leadership and representation for the
program internally. Overall this is a commercial program that needs to meet
commercial objectives - the closer to the front the better.

The goals of any restructuring are:
 a) eliminate the perception that the program is not receptive to the
business units needs or any bu's perception that they lack ownership for the
program;
 b) increase the quality of the recruits that are brought in and retained;
 c) ensure we have the best people in the organization recruiting, selling
and interviewing;
 d) ensure that we have the best commercial training program that firmly
grounds the associate in the "Enron technology" which include skills in
market understanding, structuring, finance, logistics and risk;
 e) ensure the business units have the ability to identify the outstanding
talent early and give those people the responsibility necessary to move them
up the curve quickly (ie) quickly identify the Whalley/Lavorato's in the
program and, on the flip side, quickly deal with clear non-performance issues;
 f) review the effectiveness of the current PRC process as a development,
retention and performance tool;
 g) incorporate mid-year flexibility, internet recruiting techniques,
non-traditional sources of talent and
 h) increase cost effectiveness.

The solutions may include mandated participation by certain business units,
people and teams, business tracks, etc.

I think a thorough process mapping/tracking can identify (or help me see) the
key spots for change/modification/ownership that reach these goals with the
least amount of wholesale change for the sake of change.

I think we need to get back to Jeff not next week but the following week with
a strawman.

Let me know your thoughts.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 10/31/2000
05:06 PM ---------------------------

Charlene Jackson@ENRON
10/31/2000 11:36 AM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Results of Super Saturday

FYI.  I think this is inappropriate and will speak to Jeff.  Just thought you
should know.
Charlene
---------------------- Forwarded by Charlene Jackson/Corp/Enron on 11/01/2000
11:34 AM ---------------------------

Becky Bruce
10/30/2000 10:55 PM
To: Charlene Jackson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Results of Super Saturday

FYI.
Becky
---------------------- Forwarded by Becky Bruce/NA/Enron on 10/30/2000 10:48
PM ---------------------------

David Haug@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
10/30/2000 06:03 PM
To: Shawn Cumberland/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ben F
Glisan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hal Elrod/Corp/Enron@Enron, Emilio
Vicens/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Brian Kerrigan/HOU/ECT@ECT, V
Charles Weldon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kyle Kettler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Craig Childers@ECT,
Jeff Bartlett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul J Broderick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gwynn Gorsuch@ENRON,
John House/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stewart Seeligson@ECT, Ray
McPhail/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Becky Bruce@ENRON, Mary Alison Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Results of Super Saturday

Here is how the UT candidates fared at Super Saturday. 9 of 17 got offers (
others are coming to future Super Saturdays). This result is obviously
disappointing - - -  65% of  the 55 students from all schools got offers.   I
will be getting more info on why the other 8 were not well received.  If
anyone thinks a manifest injustice or mistake has occurred let me know.
Ditto if you think anyone's prior background makes them a candidate for a
direct hire - - -i.e., not in the associate program.
     On the "yeses", please let me know who you would like to follow up on
and encourage to accept.  We will try to do this by volunteers: more than one
per student is OK, and each of you should select one or two. When you talk to
them, get their feedback on Super Saturday and the whole process. If anyone
wants to call any of the "no's", to commisserate, that's OK too. - - -DLH
---------------------- Forwarded by David Haug/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
10/30/2000 06:12 PM ---------------------------
From: Mary Alison Bailey@ECT on 10/30/2000 02:58 PM
To: David Haug/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Linda Fuqua/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: PRTD - Results of Super Saturday


Notice No. 00-334
September 29, 2000

TO:
ALL NYMEX DIVISION MEMBERS AND MEMBER FIRMS
ALL COMEX DIVISION MEMBERS AND MEMBER FIRMS

FROM: Neal Wolkoff, Executive Vice President

SUBJECT:
Proposed Amendments to the COMEX Silver Futures Contract to Add Brink,s Inc.
and Delaware Depository Service Company, LLC as Exchange Licensed
Depositories.

The Exchange proposes to amend Supplement No. 2, "Licensed Depositories and
Weighmasters for Silver" of the COMEX Silver Futures Contracts to add Brink,s
Inc.,s vault facility located at 652 Kent Avenue, Brooklyn, NY and Delaware
Depository Service Company, LLC,s vault facilities located at 3601 North
Market Street and 4200 Governor Printz Boulevard, Wilmington, DE as licensed
depositories for the storage of silver deliverable against the Exchange,s
COMEX Division Silver Futures Contract.  The proposed amendments must be
approved by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).  The Exchange
membership will be notified when CFTC approval is received and when these
amendments will become effective.

Copies of the proposed amendments are attached. Capital letters indicate
additions, bracketing [ ] indicates deletions.

Should you have any questions regarding the above, please contact Albert J.
Getz at 212-299-2608.

Silver Supplement No. 2 Proposed Rule Amendments
Capital letters indicate additions; [ ] indicate deletions.

Commodity Exchange, Inc.

Licensed Depositories and Weighmasters for Silver

New York

Depository:
ScotiaMocatta Depository,
A Division of The Bank of Nova Scotia
4 World Trade Center
New York, NY 10048
Orders: 212-912-8530

Facilities:
4 World Trade Center
New York, NY

Computer Code: 3002

Depository:
HSBC Bank
1 West 39th Street, SC 2 Level
New York, NY 10018
Orders: 212-525-6439

Facilities:
1 West 39th Street, SC Level 2
New York, NY

Computer Code: 5001

Depository:
BRINK'S INCORPORATED
SUITE 400
580 5TH AVENUE
NEW YORK, NY 10036
ORDERS: 718-260-2200

Facilities:
642 KENT AVENUE
BROOKLYN, NY

Delaware
Depository:
DELAWARE DEPOSITORY SERVICE COMPANY, LLC
3601 NORTH MARKET STREET
WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19802
ORDERS: 302-765-3884

Facilities:
3601 NORTH MARKET STREET
WILMINGTON, DELAWARE

4200 GOVERNOR PRINTZ BLVD.
WILMINGTON, DELAWARE

Additional Licensed Weighmasters For Silver

International Testing Laboratories, Inc.
578-582 Market Street
Newark, NJ 07105
Orders: (201) 589-4772

Ledoux & Company
359 Alfred Avenue
Teaneck, NJ 07666
Orders: NJ (201) 837-7160

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=sara.shackleton@enron.com&
refdoc=(00-334)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


We received the executed EEI Master Power Purchase and Sale Agreement dated 7/26/01 from the referenced CP.  A copy will be scanned into Livelink.


Hey Janie,

     How come I haven't seen your name under insider trading.  Cindy
sold 110,709 shares since last February.  Grand total of  6.2 million.

Yours truly
The Champ


Amazing New Software Lets You
Find Out Anything About Anyone
Click here for instant download
(no credit card needed):
Download Page
(This make take a few moments to load - please be patient)

Find out everything you ever wanted to know about:
your friends
your family
your enemies
your employees
yourself - Is Someone Using Your Identity?
even your boss!

Did you know that you can search for anyone, anytime, anywhere, right on the Internet?

Click here: Download Page

This mammoth collection of Internet investigative tools & research sites will provide you with nearly 400 gigantic research resources to locate information online and offline on:
people you trust, people you work with
screen new tenants, roommates, nannys, housekeepers
current or past employment
license plate numbers
unlisted & reverse phone number lookup

Click here: Download Page

o Dig up information on your FRIENDS, NEIGHBORS, or BOSS!
o Locate transcripts and COURT ORDERS from all 50 states.
o CLOAK your EMAIL so your true address can't be discovered.
o Find out how much ALIMONY your neighbor is paying.
o Discover how to check your phones for WIRETAPS.
o Or check yourself out--you may be shocked at what you find!!
These are only a few things
that you can do with this software...

To download this software, and have it in less than 5 minutes, click & visit our website:

Click here: Download Page

We respect your online time and privacy and automatically honor all remove requests. To have your address removed from from our mailing list, simply click the unsubscribe link below (or reply with REMOVE in the subject), but you must do so from this e-mail account--otherwise we will not be able to find you on our list! Please do not include any correspondence--this is just our automatic removal robot. :)
[Click Here to be Removed]

 Thank you! Copyright ? 2001, all rights reserved.