Forwarded as requested.  I will check with Gary regarding the status.  At the
time that I sent this I was informed that they were ready to sign.
----- Forwarded by Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT on 04/19/2001 09:01 AM -----

	Dan J Hyvl
	03/13/2001 11:36 AM

		 To: "Michael D. Ansell" <MDANSEL@westvaco.com>
		 cc: Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT, "Irene Kowalczyk" <IAKOWAL@westvaco.com>
		 Subject: Re: Latest Contract

Michael,

 Gary asked me to review your requested changes and provide revised documents
for your review and, if acceptable, execution. Attached please find
2001-012bcrfm which is the extension document, 2001-012abbcrfm which is the
clean copy of the long term document modified as discussed in 1,2 and 3
below, and 2001-012abbrcrfm with is the red-line of the changes which have
been incorporated in the clean version of the long term document.

 1.  I have left the reference in 3) to MinDQ, because the DCQ should always
be less than the MinDQ and as such, any short fall in required purchases less
than the MinDQ (which includes the DCQ) will be bought back by the Company.
I have added a sentence at the end to provide that Customer will be credited
for the Buyback Volume which Company purchases from Customer.  By way of
examples,  (A) assume that the DCQ for a day was set at 15,000; that
Customer's total natural gas requirements for such day was 20,000; and
Customer's actual purchases from Company for such day was 12,000.  In that
event the MinDQ would be 20,000 and Customer would purchase 15,000 from
Company at the price in 1); Customer would purchase 5,000 from Company at the
price in 2); and Company would purchase 8,000 from Customer at the price in
3).  (B) assume that the DCQ for a day was set at 15,000; that Customer's
total natural gas requirements for such day was 12,000; and Customer's actual
purchases from the Company for such day was 12,000.  In that event the MinDQ
would be 15,000 and Customer would purchase 15,000 from Company at the price
in 1) and Company would purchase 3,000 from Customer at the price in 3).

 2. I have added your requested paragraph 4) to provide that should
Customer's total natural gas requirements be below the DCQ and the parties
are able to agree on a reduced DCQ below Customer's total natural gas
requirements, then no buyback would be applicable.

 3. I have revised the last sentence of the Fixed Price Strategies as you
requested.


Start Date: 4/16/01; HourAhead hour: 10;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041610.txt

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
+++ Hour 10 - bad data from ISO.
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/16/01
  TRADING_SC: PGAE
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1


Today we released additional information about our related party and off-balance sheet transactions.  We have made this information available both on our website and in a Form 8-K filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

The information provides further details about:

	-- the $1.2 billion charge to shareholders' equity announced in the third quarter and the transactions related to that charge;
	-- a restatement of prior years' financial statements to reflect this reduction in shareholders' equity, the consolidation of     three entities and prior year proposed audit adjustments and reclassifications;
	-- the Special Committee appointed by the Enron Board of Directors to review transactions between Enron and related parties;
	-- the LJM limited partnerships, including a discussion of transactions between Enron and LJM entities; and
	-- transactions between Enron and other Enron employees.

This information addresses a number of concerns that have been raised by our shareholders and the SEC.  As our Board's new Special Committee continues its review of various matters, we will continue to cooperate fully with the SEC in its investigation, and we will continue to respond to investor requests so that they can evaluate, appreciate and appropriately value the strength of our core businesses.

Restatement of Earnings

Based on information that we have recently obtained, Enron and its auditors determined that certain off-balance sheet entities should have been included in Enron's consolidated financial statements pursuant to generally accepted accounting principles.  As a result, Enron will restate its financial statements from 1997 to 2000 and for the first and second quarters of 2001.  These restatements have no material effect on Enron's current financial position.  Here are some details included in the filing:

Net income for each period will be impacted by the retroactive consolidation of Joint Energy Development Investments (JEDI) and Chewco beginning in November 1997, the consolidation of an LJM1 subsidiary for 1999 and 2000 and prior year proposed audit adjustments.  Enron's current assessment indicates that the restatement will include:

	-- a reduction of approximately $96 million in 1997
	-- a reduction of approximately $113 million in 1998
	-- a reduction of approximately $250 million in 1999
	-- a reduction of approximately $132 million in 2000
	-- an increase of approximately $17 million for the first quarter of 2001
	-- an increase of approximately $5 million for the second quarter of 2001
	-- a reduction of $17 million for the third quarter of 2001.

The consolidation of JEDI and Chewco also will increase Enron's debt by approximately $711 million in 1997, $561 million in 1998, $685 million in 1999 and $628 million in 2000.

The restatement will have no material impact on Enron's reported earnings for the nine-month period ending September 2001.

You can obtain more detailed information on the items described above by accessing the Form 8-K filing at <http://www.enron.com/corp/sec/>.

We will continue to review our strategic, operational and financial position, and we will continue to keep you updated on any developments.


Hello,

You are invited to take part in our annual Media Training Workshop, featuring
Tripp Frohlichstein of Media Masters.  He is a "master" at teaching this
program and has done a great job at informing - as well as entertaining -
previous workshop attendees.  This year's workshop, helpful to both beginner
and experienced professionals who currently work, or desire to work with the
media, is being held at Cadence Design Systems on April 26th and 27th, 2001,
and is co-sponsored by the San Jose Silicon Valley Chamber of Commerce

The registration fee for this event varies from $100.00 to $250.00.

Please see the attached registration form or click on our "press hat" icon on
the SVMG home page at www.svmg.org, for more information and a further
description on this exciting program.

Please contact Michelle or myself for more information.

Best regards,

Michael Wero
Associate, Communications
Silicon Valley Manufacturing Group
408-501-7862 - p
408-501-7861 - f

Michelle Montague-Bruno
Director, Communications
Silicon Valley Manufacturing Group
408-501-7853 - p
408-501-7861 - f
mmontague-bruno@svmg.org

 - media_train_2001_workshop.doc


Per my conversation today with Lorraine Ibrom @ PG&E (El Paso), she has
informed me that some maintenance work is being done on the Yeary (sp?) 20
in. line.  This will affect meters 6040 PG&E Riverside and 584 PG&E Agua
Dulce, beginning at 11:59 P.M. on January 8, 2001 and ending at 9:00 a.m. on
January 12, 2001.  She has informed me that for this time period there should
be no nominations at these points.  Thanks.


Jeff,

I don't understand what you want me to do with this letter.  Regarding the utilities,  you and I know that I have had the right to shut off the utilities to a property I don't own for sometime now.  I did not do that because I wanted to stay on good terms with the Kuo's while negotiating the release.  I had the utilities taken out of my name yesterday.  The city of seguin informs me that the meters were read yesterday and the final bill will be mailed to me next week.  Then I can compute the amount that the Kuo's owe me for utilities and send them a check for the rock repairs.  Please let Pauline know that she needs to go down to the city and take care of the deposit by Friday or the power may be disconnected.  The utilities are already in her name.

In my mind the utilities were never a bargaining chip.  Rather, you and I are paying the $11,000 in exchange for the release.  Regarding the transfer of ownership into a limited partnership, I will most likely be agreeable to this but I want to review all the loan documents with Jacques and ensure that there is still a personal guarantee on the two notes.  I expect to have that done by Friday.

I would like for her to sign the release today, but if she won't sign until I consent to the limited partnership then the release will have to wait until Friday.  As far as the utilities go,  I made the transfer for two reasons: 1) I need to know the amount that I have paid to net against the $11,000 and 2) I had the right to take the utilities out of my name and I didn't want the balance to get out of hand.

I will call you when I am comfortable consenting to the limited partnership.

Phillip

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Jeff Smith" <jsmith@austintx.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Jeff+20Smith+22+20+3Cjsmith+40austintx+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, June 12, 2001 3:25 PM
To:	Allen, Phillip K.
Subject:	The Stage

I spoke with Pauline and she says she is ready to transfer the utilities.
However, she wants to get your signed permission to transfer their ownership
interests to the J&P Kuo, Ltd. for purposes of paying back the two notes.
(per her attorneys advice).  She is ready to sign the settlement, but she
has not been able to talk to her lawyer who is tied up in court.

I have attached a Word file with the a letter to them which authorizes the
transfer.  If it is acceptable please sign and fax to her directly at
830-372-5400.  Please fax to me also.

Thanks.

Jeff Smith
The Smith Company
2714 Bee Cave Road, Suite 100-D
Austin, Texas  78746
512-732-0009
512-732-0010 fax
512-751-9728 mobile

 - stagecoach settlement letter to kuo.doc << File: stagecoach settlement letter to kuo.doc >>


Jeff, I read in Gas Daily that the Cal PUC has issued an OII on the adequacy
of supply and pipeline infrastructure in southern California.  Could you have
someone send me a copy of the order whenever it is issued?  Steve thinks it's
something we might want to get involved in, but I need to know more.

Great to see you last week.

Ciao,
Susan


How the heck are ya?  I have been thinking of  you alot lately.  I tried to guess your e:mail address a couple of times  over the last couple of months but there is just no guessing it.  I finally  had to call Laura Vuittonet.

Well, I'm having a great time home with the  kids.  I really thought I would be bored by now but I feel just a busy just  not as tired.  In fact, for the first time since I had my kids I feel very  rested and at peace.  It's fun being a kid and  running around Houston  when there isn't much traffic and it nice having the time to slow down the  pace.

The boys are in Mothers Day Out 2 times a week from  9:00 - 2:00 which really isn't much time at all.  I could use another day  of alone time.  On those days I am usually meeting with Enron or once in a  while I meet a friend for lunch.  Time really flies.

Anyway, I hope all is well for you.  Miss  ya.

Janet

Janet Wallis
8118 Waynemer Way
Houston, Texas  77040
(713) 937-0919


Dear Mr. Kvetinskas,

Per the instructions of Julie Gomez, I am forwarding you a marked version of the above referenced LOI containing the changes that Ms. Gomez discussed with you this afternoon.  Please feel free to call me at 713-853-7238 with any questions regarding the attached.

Steve Van Hooser


Kate,

My assistant, Shirley Crenshaw, will schedule a meeting.
Vince

Kate Lucas
10/17/2000 11:57 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: rotational opportunities within your group

Dear Vince,

I am a rotating associate and would like to learn more about opportunities
within your group. I have worked in RAC and am currently in Financial
Trading. I believe the Associate/Analyst program may forward you my CV, but I
thought it good to get in touch personally.
Please let me know if there is someone with whom I could speak about the
group and its needs for associates.

With best regards,
Kate


Forwarded at the request of Joe Hillings:

Joe Hillings: -- The notes look great.  I have made a couple of technical
corrections to the document, which I am attaching as a separate file.

To all -- everyone here at Hills & company hopes you have a wonderful
holiday!

Bob Fisher (Hills & Company)

___________________________________________________________________________
Dear Friends: Please review, correct, make additions and return. Joe

The Energy Services Coalition (please note that we are no longer using
US
WTO ESC) met at the request of Carol Balassa of USTR to get her
perspective
on energy services negotiations of the WTO and what our coalition needs
to
accomplish as well as a time perspective.

Present from the USG were Carol Balassa (USTR), Josephine Ludolph and
Richard Boll (DOC), Russ Profozich (DOE), Patricia Norman (DOS) and a
regular from the ITC.

Joe Hillings, Christina Bolton, Bob Fisher, Steve Burns, Brian Petty and
Chris Long represented the ESC.

Carol conducted an extensive and excellent briefing listing several
phases
of activity. She started the session by telling those present that the
lack
of action at Seattle was not a negative on what we need to accomplish
this
coming year. We are on track and need to produce various position papers
as
early as the end of January.

Articles 19 of the GATT requires that the WTO make progress on
agriculture
and services issues although it does not identify a date certain to
achieve
agreement..

Ambassador Barshefsky is committed to beginning services negotiations
beginning in January.

A Committee on Specific Committments is charged with the responsibility
to
draft issues. The USTR wants to have a definition of issues from the ESC
by
the end of January to be submitted to the USG representatives on the
Committee.

A second significant group in the process is the Working Group On
Domestic
Rights.This group is chaired by Peter Collins. Peter needs to know what
are
the domestic regulatory issues that could be raised by other WTO members
as
reasons not to liberalize various sectors. This information is to be
supplied in the first half of 2000.

In late spring after group one and two have done a significant part of
their work the USTR will be deciding what additional principles are
needed
to be tabled in the negotiation. They expect these working groups will
begin to meet at the WTO by the end of next summer.

Three basic columns headed by (1) Market Access, (2) National Treatment,
(3) Additional Committments (Could be proposed annex such as the process
Tim Richards has proposed in our Electricity Working Group listing
examples) is the format to be developed for the two groups.

Carol advised us that whatever we develop should be with the intention
of
getting Less Developed Countries (LDCs) supporting our basic principles
in
case a multilateral negotiation is not launched. We should work the
current
liberalization process being prosecuted in the APEC and FTAA
negotiations..

The next phase of Carol's presentation addressed the recent response
USTR
received to the questions they submitted to DG 17 (it no longer exisits
under the new commission) asking the EU to address their feelings about
the
liberalization of energy services.

We have not been given a copy of the EU response and Carol has asked Ms.
Klinkers of the EU if the response can be shared with the ESC to secure
industry responce. Carol and others from the USG attending the meeting
are
trying to ascertain just who drafted the responses which they
characterized
as "confusing and not indicating a real understanding of the current
practices and developments in the energy services sector."  We do know
that
the USG has called this office to ask how they need to respond to the EU
response that electricity is a good and not a service. Our immediate
response is that this is a matter of some disagreement among EU members
and
the EU staff. The movement of electricity across national boundries may
be
a good but the sale and trading of electricity is definately a service.

The EU response we were told makes the agrument that in their view that
many of the items raised in the October paper of the USTR were GAT
covered
such as construction, engineering, etc and therefore, may not need to be
raised in the services negotiations although these items will at least
need
some sort of annex to make sure they are included.. The EU believes that
if
you own or operate electricity producting  then its a good but if you
operate an IPP to sell electricity to various parties, its a service.

We were told that the EU response does not seem to understand or cover
renewables such as wind and solar both of which are important in
Europe's
plan to diversify and develop green energy.  They also believe that
price/risk management should be considered under finance services not
energy services.

The session was then open to general discussion. Bob Fisher commented
that
the EU does not seem to understand the scope of today's energy services
industry. That we now have a seemless web of energy services that has
been
developed. What about environmental services? Again, the EU response is
confusted and incomplete. Apparently they feel that environmental
services
can be considered elsewhere in the negotiation.

Who from the EU drafted this paper? The staff has changed and we don't
know
how "high" in their heirarchy this was considered. Carol Balassa
responded
that she is trying to determine who drafted the response..  Brian Petty
advised that his intelligence is that energy services is being discussed
and considered at the highest levels of the Commission.

Carol told us that she is trying to get everything together before
"talking" to the EU in January when she hopes to specifically respond
and
discuss their current returned response. Therefore, she is asking the
Energy Services Coalition to complete the work of our four Working
Groups
which will allow the Hills people to develop the definition and basic
negotiating position papers.

The DOS representative then suggested that we engage in some"capacity
building." This was defined as an outreach program to brief WTO member
delegations on the meaning of energy services. Carol suggested that
after
her January meeting the EU could be agreeable to having our industry
group
meet with their representatives to explain how energy services has
evolved
and what is included in energy services.

We moved to a discussion of the definitions paper itself. Bob Fisher
reminded those present that the current matrix developed for the APEC
process was still an excellent guide to definitions although items such
as
renewables, heating and certain trading and financial services would
need
to be added. To meet some EU concerns that they are not a party to APEC
and
therefore suspicious of any such document, we should remove the
reference
to APEC.

Our group pointed to the Tim Richards paper developed for our
Electricity
Working Group which gives a broad definition but then contains a
footnote
known as the illustrative list which lists the various items that we
believe constitute energy services under that heading. Bob Fisher said
that
this was the likely format we would ultimately adopt in the material
prepared for USTR and others in the WTO process.  Bob said that once
negotiators agree on the need for liberalized energy services they can
"fit" whatever they want under the broad definition.

The last question raised was what happens to the ATL (accelerated tariff
liberalization) which also covers some energy matters which WTO
countries
had contemplated being approved in Seattle. Carol said that she did not
know.

The meeting then adjourned.

The ESC needs to complete the Working Group process and complete the
questionaire at the earliest possible time to allow the Hills people to
prepare the basic document. Working Group chairs are to be asked to
complete this process by mid January.

Dear Reviewers: Please review at your earliest opportunity, make
corrections, additions and whatever and return to me for distribution.
Distribution will be to our ESC Executive Committee first and then to
our
entire membership of 45 (not to those who have not signed on as members)
and to USG participants.

 - ESC~Balassa~briefing~memcon~12-99.doc


Richard,
       Thanks for checking in.  We are doing fine.  In fact, while Enron lost 4,000 of 7,000 people yesterday, I didn't lose any (gas has to flow, you know), but most of the people that I've brought up through the organization are gone.  I can't imagine that I'll need to layoff more than 6 or 7 people in the near future.  None of the pipes have filed Ch.11 and there are no plans to do so.
       Judy and the kids are doing fine.  We do see London alumni on a regular basis.  Are you going to be here over the holidays?  We'd love to see you guys. Let me know what your calendar looks like.

Dan

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Vaughan, Richard" <Richard.Vaughan@ElPaso.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, December 04, 2001 10:00 AM
To:	'dmccarty@enron.com'
Subject:	checking in

Hey Danny,

Everyone here at ICC is praying for our Enron "alumni" back in Houston, and
I hope you and the family are ok.

I just wanted to check in on you and see how you are weathering this storm;
it's got to be indescribably gut wrenching.
fyi, we are coming back; me in January to work for Stan Babiuk in Major
Projects and the family will return early March.  Everyone is still in
denial, but it is best for me right now.  EP Europe is definitely not where
I need to be in the short term.

Drop me a note back if you get a spare minute.
take care

Richard Vaughan
ph. +44-(0)20-7024-3202
e-mail:  richard.vaughan@elpaso.com
El Paso Europe Ltd.
1-3 Strand, Trafalgar Square
London  WC2N 5EJ

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender.
******************************************************************


Fyi.
 Alan Aronowitz

-----Original Message-----
From: sgreenberg@glocap.com@ENRON [NOTES:sgreenberg@glocap.com@ENRON]
To: Aronowitz, Alan <Alan.Aronowitz@ENRON.com>
Sent: Fri Oct 19 11:22:56 2001
Subject: Glocap- Selected Favorite Headhunter by Forbes.com

Dear Alan:

I hope that you are well.

Glocap Legal Search is one of the fastest growing in-house legal recruiting firms in the nation.    We have worked very hard to create a truly unique and powerful legal recruiting company and we were gratified recently when  Forbes.com selected us the best recruiting website in the country!  We recruit for Fortune 500 companies, major financial institutions, consulting companies, investment banks and many other public and private companies of all sizes.

I am writing to  ask for your help. Do you know anyone who might be interested in hearing more about us?  I have briefly summarized a very small sample of the many truly outstanding, pre-screened attorneys available through our unique service. We have many more, in all practice areas and experience levels. Call me if you would like to discuss how we can be of service to your company.

 Attorneys available now include:

1. Northwestern  University School of Law (cum laude) graduate has over 4 years experience working on computer software, intellectual property and internet related issues, with particular emphasis on e-commerce and complex licensing. This very highly regarded attorney seeks a corporation or financial institution that needs in house counsel for domestic and/or international tech law matters. Midwest preferred.

2. This 1995 graduate of a top 10 law school also has an MBA (magna cum laude) from a top business school. Superb experience as a corporate attorney at a top firm (with an emphasis in entertainment law). Currently GC of an entertainment company with great corporate, securities, intellectual property and corporate governance matters. Very savvy and articulate. Willing to work on either coast, Texas or Florida.

3. A truly uniquely credentialed attorney who graduated Stanford Law School and has a graduate degree from Columbia, this candidate is also a shared recipient of the Pulitzer Prize for investigative reporting and writing. Currently a litigator at a top law firm, this attorney has the intelligence,   writing ability, and work ethic to enhance any company's litigation department. Fluent in Spanish.

4.  Georgetown Law Center (cum laude) and Stanford undergraduate has over four years experience advising both private and public companies on general business/corporate matters as well as venture and debt financings, licensing, mergers and acquisitons, and public offerings. Terrific experience in securities and corporate counseling. Available either in California or East Coast.

5. A talented attorney with over eight years experience doing project finance and lending, mergers and acquisitions, and capital markets transactions at two very prominent law firms. This Russian speaking attorney has represented investors, lenders, and multilateral agencies in power, energy and natural resources industry sectors, as well as financial services, IT and telecom clients in a wide variety of m & a matters.

6. This 1996 graduate of a highly regarded law school has over five years of solid general corporate experience. Great drafting skills and superb presence, this candidate will be a very welcome addition to any in house legal staff that seeks an intelligent, hard working and very well trained corporate generalist.

7.  Attorney who graduated first in his law class is  practicing corporate restructuring and reorganization at one of New York's premier law firms. Four years experience in all aspects of distressed debt transactions, including asset sales, plans of reorganization, asset-based financings, cross-border insolvency issues and strategic distressed acquisitions. Seeking in-house or investment banking position.

8. Yale Law School, Princeton University (magna cum laude).  Senior VP of one of top financial institutions in the world, this attorney has played a leading legal, business, integration and managerial role in acquisitons, joint ventures, equity investments and divestitures. Also has broad epxerience in securities law at a top law firm. Very well spoke and personable, this candidate is interested in  a  senior business/GC type position. NY metro area.

9.   Yale University (magna cum laude), Harvard Law School (cum laude) candidate with three years transactional experience at premier law firm before leaving to become general counsel at a new media company.  Has broad corporate, real estate and and technology experience.  Exceedlingly smart, conscientious, and energetic. This candidate will be an enormous asset to any company that hires him.  Wants NY area only.

10. UChicago Law School, over five years extraordinary experience at both a top law firm and a premier incubator. Practice areas include corporate, securities, intellectual property, mergers & acquisitions, venture capital financings and technology. Dynamic, very highly regarded attorney also speaks mandarin chinese. Wants in-house or legal/business position in Southern California only.

This is just a very small sample of the attorney/candidates that we work with. We can of course tailor our search to meet any specifications that you wish. Feel free to call us to discuss our service, or to refer us to a colleague that might be interested in hearing more about us, or to obtain references from our clients.  I hope I will be speaking with you soon.

Thank you for taking the time to  consider our service.

--
Steven J. Greenberg, Esq.
Managing Partner
Glocap Legal Search LLC
Carnegie Hall Tower
152 West 57th Street, 27th Floor
New York, New York 10019-3310
212-333-6431 phone
212-333-6401 fax
greenberg@glocap.net

www.glocaplaw.com


Bryce,

I am not comfortable with bringing someone in without an agreement.  I should
have a draft to you this afternoon at the latest, so it should not be a
problem for the person to start tomorrow.  I will ask my assistant, Twanda,
to send you the confidentiality agreement that we require all contract
personnel to sign so that you can get it to the person for signature today.

Michelle

	Bryce Baxter
	05/15/2000 08:40 AM

		 To: Norma Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Staffing

Do you have any concerns/issues with Rebecca's proposal below to start the
contractor without the formal contract in place?
---------------------- Forwarded by Bryce Baxter/HOU/ECT on 05/15/2000 08:39
AM ---------------------------

"Rebecca P. Soots" <rpsoots@esc-hdq.com> on 05/12/2000 07:39:20 PM
To: "Bryce Baxter (E-mail)" <bryce.baxter@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Staffing

Hi Bryce,

In discussing the difficulties in getting this contract in place to meet
both your needs and Mr. Lloyds, it was brought to my attention that since we
have already established a good working relationship with Enron that we
would not have a problem allowing Mr. Lloyd to begin working without an
official contract in place.  I do not know how your management would feel
about a letter of proposal, which would serve as a temporary work
authorization until the final contract is in place but it is something that
ESC is willing to do.  Assuming Ms. Cash is able to pull together the Master
Service Agreement by Monday and everything is agreeable to ESC then it
obviously would not be necessary to implement a temporary work
authorization.  However, should we run into further obstacles, I wanted to
share with you this possible opportunity.

One of the things that I wanted to discuss with you is your remaining
staffing requirements.  I am not sure I have a clear picture of the exact
skills you are looking for and would like to avoid sending you resumes which
do meet your needs.  Also, how many candidates are you looking to bring on?

I look forward to hearing from you, hopefully we'll be luckier with the
phones next week...

Thank You,

Rebecca P. Soots
Manager
Enterprise Services Company
713.219.4234
Rpsoots@esc-hdq.com
Fax - 713.270.7195


Team,

I spoke with Audrey today who mentioned that their meeting with Tom Brown has
gone well.  She has asked me to set up a meeting regarding Strategy on this
potential acquisition.  Let's plan to meet at 10:00am this Friday, 12/8 in
room EB3335.

Thanks,
Mark


here it is.  df
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 12/18/2000
09:09 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Donna Martens                           12/15/2000 05:23 PM

To: Dorothy McCoppin/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Mary
Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven
Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Earl
Chanley/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ronald Matthews/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Arnold L
Eisenstein/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, JERRY
MARTIN/ENRON@enronxgate, Patrick Brennan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dave
Waymire/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Keith Petersen/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, James
Centilli/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Johnny McGee/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Randy
Rice/OTS/Enron@ENRON, David Roensch/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rich
Jolly/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rick Smith/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tim
Kissner/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Norm Spalding/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Dave Waymire/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John R Keller/OTS/Enron@Enron, Mary Kay
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Gallup Mods

Attached is a draft application, including exhibits, requesting FERC approval
to replace the existing 10,000 HP driver at the Gallup Compressor Station
with a 15,000 HP (Service factor 1.1).  Please review, provide coments, and
sign and fax the FERC authorization form (7592 in Omaha) to me no later than
3 P.M. on Tuesday, 12/19.  Any questions, please let me know.  Thanks.  Donna


This is the last version of 27 that was floated around.  AT the time -- a couple of months ago -- Aaron had been the point person to "keep talking" to Bowen and had discussed these changes with her office.  At this point, Norm Plotkin will be point for ARM and will coordinate all the members and their lobbyists.

-----Original Message-----
From: Aaron Thomas [mailto:athomas@newenergy.com]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:44 AM
To: arem@electric.com
Subject: Fwd(2): Re: redline of 27xx

Forgot to attach


All,

Below is the website for the Old SF Steak House, the restaurant where we will
be dining on Wednesday.  Please check the menu and the directions.

http://osfsteakhouse.com/

Best regards,

Xi Xi


still waiting on these 2 deals.

Kerri Thompson
11/16/2000 04:10 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: apb checkout

missing deals

jeff r
selling williams
20-30th
25 mw
sp15
115.00
on peak

jeff r
buying ees
20-30th
25 mw
sp15
114.95
on peak

tom a
buying koch
20-30
25 mw
114.00
palo
on peak


Dutch,
Texas Independent Energy is looking for fixed price gas for their two power plants.  This is the strip of volumes and the term they are looking for. Please send me back your offer.
Thanks,

J.D. Buss
Work:       713-853-3851
Cell:          713-962-5561
E-mail:      jd.buss@enron.com


I liked him.  He has experience with some of the physical issues that we are trying to correct.  I think he would be a good liaison between commercial and IT.

Hunter

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Stock, Stephen
Sent:	Monday, April 23, 2001 9:57 AM
To:	Shively, Hunter S.
Subject:	Interview

Hi Hunter,

I understand you interviewed David Hsu last week........I'd be gratefull if you could let me know what you thought of him.

best regards

Steve


Mark:  I would suggest we add netting.  Will you talk to Carol and see if she
is interested.  Let me know.   Mark Haedicke

	Mark Taylor
	04/13/2001 02:27 PM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Credit Lawyer responsibilities

Here's a draft of the bullet points you requested:


You shouldn't have told Ben.

	From:  Kathleen Carnahan                           03/29/2001 04:57 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T
Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ann Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carlos
Sole/NA/Enron@Enron, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lorie Leigh/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: My schedule

I will be out of the office tomorrow and Monday.  I can be reached at home
(281) 363-1477 on Monday.

Kathleen


Another suggestion would be to carve-out specific issues for
discussion/research by smaller working groups who could report back to the
larger group on their conclusions.  This might make the larger group
discussions more manageable without limiting people's opportunity to
participate.  Just a suggestion.

	Wayne Gardner@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
	01/24/2001 12:03 PM

		 To: Jan Haizmann/LON/ECT@ECT@ENRON
		 cc: Alisa Christensen/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Angie
Buis/Enron Communications@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS, Beth Wapner/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Carolyn Barrett/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Cynthia Harkness/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, David DeGabriele/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Derenda Plunkett/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Donald Lassere/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Gerry Willis/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, James Ginty/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Jan
Haizmann/LON/ECT@ECT@ENRON, Jane
Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ECT@ENRON, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@ENRON, Kathleen Noble/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Lara Leibman/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Malini Mallikarjun/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ECT@ENRON, Michael
Grimes/AP/Enron@Enron, Michael
Norris/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ECT@ENRON, Michelle Hicks/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Mike
Dahlke/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ECT@ENRON, Rajen
Shah/LON/ECT@ECT@ENRON, Richard Anderson/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Robbi Rossi/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Sue
Nord/NA/Enron@Enron, Xi Xi/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 Subject: Re: TAR&L MEETINGS, 1/25, 2/1 & 2/8

Jan,
I agree that the meetings are too large.  However, I think it is imperative
that each discipline be represented in the meeting.  To that end, I would ask
that each of Accounting, Regulatory and Legal send no more than two
representatives to participate in the TARL meeting in Houston.  A commercial
person should attend as well.  The only exception to this rule should be a
temporary exception for you and Mike to call in, with other exceptions to be
made as hot issues arise.

Angie will see what she can do about arranging a videoconference but does not
make any promises, as any type of conference room is difficult to find these
days.

Minutes would be great.  Given that the most recent TARL meeting was entirely
about your area of responsibility, we volunteer you to write those minutes.

Thanks.

W. Wayne Gardner
Enron Broadband Services
1400 Smith Street
Houston, TX  77002-7361
Phone:  713 853 3547
Fax:  713 646 2532

	Jan Haizmann@ECT
	24/01/2001 07:57

		 To: Angie Buis/Enron Communications@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS@ENRON
		 cc: Alisa Christensen/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, James
Ginty/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Beth Wapner/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, David DeGabriele/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Richard Anderson/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Rajen Shah/LON/ECT@ECT, Cynthia
Harkness/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Derenda Plunkett/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Donald Lassere/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Gerry Willis/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Jan Haizmann/LON/ECT@ECT, Jane
Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Lara Leibman/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Malini
Mallikarjun/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michael
Norris/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michelle Hicks/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Mike
Dahlke/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robbi Rossi/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Sue Nord/NA/Enron@Enron, Xi Xi/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Michael Grimes/AP/Enron@Enron, Carolyn
Barrett/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Wayne Gardner/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Kathleen Noble/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
		 Subject: Re: TAR&L MEETINGS, 1/25, 2/1 & 2/8

Dear all:

Following my experience of the last meeting, my feeling is that we need more
to focus on some items instead of having ever expanding discussions. I am in
favour of having smaller meetings instead of big cometogethers. I thing that
meeting should focus on two or three subjects and having smaller teams to
work out solutions on specified tasks. I also think that we can achieve
better time efficiency without losing the learning effect of discussing.

A second point would be my preference to have you on the screen. In
particular for those dialling in from abroad, it would be helpful in order to
better follow the discussion.

Lastly, I wonder whether it would not be useful to have short minutes of
every meeting for those who did not succeed in participating.

Let me have your thoughts on these suggestions.

Jan

ANGIE BUIS@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
22/01/2001 20:57
To: Alisa Christensen/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, James
Ginty/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Beth Wapner/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, David DeGabriele/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Richard Anderson/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Rajen Shah/LON/ECT@ECT, Cynthia
Harkness/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Derenda Plunkett/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Donald Lassere/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Gerry Willis/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Jan Haizmann/LON/ECT@ECT, Jane
Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Lara Leibman/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Malini
Mallikarjun/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michael
Norris/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michelle Hicks/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Mike
Dahlke/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robbi Rossi/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Sue Nord/NA/Enron@Enron, Xi Xi/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Michael Grimes/AP/Enron@Enron, Carolyn
Barrett/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
cc: Wayne Gardner/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Kathleen
Noble/Enron Communications@Enron Communications

Subject: TAR&L MEETINGS, 1/25, 2/1 & 2/8

I have reserved conference room EB 4325 for the next 3 TAR&L meetings (1/25,
2/1 & 2/8).  The meeting will run from 8:30 to 11:30 and a light breakfast
will be served.

The dial in number for these next 3 meetings is as follows:

International Participants: 1-805-240-9463, passcode 449834
Domestic Participants:  1-888-232-3866. passcode 449834

Host (Wayne):   1-888-232-3866, passcode 860073 (host only)

There are a total of seven ports and automatic port expansion should
additional parties wish to join in.  All that is necessary is to dial the
appropriate number above.

Should you have any questions, or need additional assistance, please do not
hesitate to contact me at 713-853-7097.

Thanks!

Angie Buis
EBS Tax
(713) 853-7097


Start Date: 5/1/01; HourAhead hour: 10;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001050110.txt
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database


Since you both asked the same question, I thought I would send an email.

The little I know about rail is that the railroads control the contracts.
You do it their way.

There is a lot of language in the LM contract concerning shipment, risk of
loss, insurance, delivery.  I haven't thought through it all, but these
issues probably need to be considered.   It may be best to work through GE on
a change order basis to have them handle the shipment and storage elsewhere.
Otherwise, we run the risk of having a dispute with them later about any
problems or damage.

I will be talking to GE this afternoon if you want the topic to be discussed
then.

Good luck!

Kay


Okey dokey.

	From:  Matthew F Gockerman @ ECT                           09/24/2000 04:08 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: VEPCO - Tax Clause

Kay:

I have been speaking with Barbara Cole at Dominion Resources regarding
Article 11 (Taxes) of the Capacity and Energy Agreement By and Between
Edgecombe Development Co., LLC and Virginia Electric and Power Company.
Below please find a revised Article 11.2.

We recommend the deletion of the language in red.  Additionally, we recommend
the insertion of the language in blue.

Thanks.

- Matt
(x33979)

PS:  Barbara is also notifying her Legal contact of this change.

 - ARTICLE 11 Enron contract.doc


New positions w/ the H04 sales in.

-----Original Message-----
From: Hood, Stephen (NY Int)
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 11:13 AM
To: 'Dutch.Quigley@enron.com'
Cc: Timmins, Martin (NY Int)
Subject: RE: enron bod risk

Thanks

-----Original Message-----
From: Dutch.Quigley@enron.com [mailto:Dutch.Quigley@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 10:55 AM
To: shood@manfinancial.com
Subject: RE: enron bod risk

Return Receipt

    Your      RE: enron bod risk
    document
    :

    was       Dutch Quigley/ENRON@enronXgate
    received
    by:

    at:       12/14/2001 09:54:32 AM

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************

 - enron breakdown  12-14 mid day.xls


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 03/16/2000
02:07 PM ---------------------------

Stephane Brodeur
03/16/2000 07:06 AM
To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Maps

As requested by John, here's the map and the forecast...
Call me if you have any questions (403) 974-6756.


Chris--This is a duplicate of what I sent you earlier today.

Doug Kinney
Ph:  703-561-6339
Fax:  703-561-7317

 - 03-30-00 Daily VolsAM.xls


Holley,

Thanks for your call re terms for the GISB.  Please see attached draft with
special provisions.

Best regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Stinson,

Can we give access to her and WHY?

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/10/2001
05:17 PM ---------------------------

ARSystem <ARSystem@mailman.enron.com> on 01/10/2001 08:59:24 AM
To: "vince.j.kaminski@enron.com" <vince.j.kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Request Submitted: Access Request for jennifer.n.stewart@enron.com

You have received this email because you are listed as an alternate data
approver. Please click
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000013085&Page=
Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000013085
Approver            : stinson.gibner@enron.com
Request Create Date : 1/10/01 8:59:14 AM
Requested For       : jennifer.n.stewart@enron.com
Resource Name       : \\enehou\houston\common\Research - [Read]
Resource Type       : Directory


Any weather deals that you see that have WS and then a two-digit number need
to be sent back to have our number written on them.  They should be returned
to Celeste Cisneros.  I am not sure where she is located, but if you happen
to find any of these, just ask and whoever does the run will make sure they
go to the proper location.

Thank you!
Brenna


With Ken Lay's resignation, you undoubtedly have questions about Enron's management structure and what lies ahead for the company.  The purpose of this communication is to begin to answer those questions and lay out the direction we plan to follow as we regroup and rebuild.

First, the Creditors Committee has proposed that the Board of Directors retain an interim CEO to focus on the restructuring process.  This is a positive sign that the Committee believes Enron will provide greater value as a viable ongoing business.

The Enron Board of Directors has approved Stephen Cooper as interim CEO and chief restructuring officer.  Steve is the managing partner of Zolfo Cooper, a corporate recovery and crisis management firm with more than 30 years experience leading companies through operational and financial reorganizations.

Steve and his firm will work with members of Enron's current management to develop and implement a comprehensive plan to restructure the company and emerge from bankruptcy.

As you know, Enron has entered into an agreement with UBS Warburg for the sale of NetCo, Enron's wholesale gas and power trading organization.  In preparation for the transition of NetCo to UBS, Greg Whalley has resigned as president and COO of Enron to assume a position with UBS Warburg.  We want to thank Greg and the NetCo employees joining UBS for their contributions to Enron and wish them great success going forward.

In addition to engaging Steve, Enron has formed an Office of the Chief Executive.  I will join Steve in that office as president and chief operating officer, and Ray Bowen will join us as executive vice president and chief financial officer.

We will provide additional information regarding the roles and responsibilities of Enron's entire management team once those become more fully defined.

Thank you for continuing to support Enron by performing your job everyday.  The ongoing uncertainty about our future, coupled with the constant media scrutiny, makes this situation difficult for all of us. While no one can control the media, we can and will define our leadership and devise our strategy for moving ahead.  And in doing so, we will build a more certain future for our company and our employees.

Link to the press release: http://www.enron.com/corp/pressroom/releases/2002/ene/012902Release.html


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 01/26/2001 11:21 AM -----

	"Julee Malinowski-Ball" <jmball@ns.net>
	01/26/2001 11:15 AM
	Please respond to "Julee Malinowski-Ball"

		 To: "William Hall" <wfhall2@duke-energy.com>, "Tony Wetzel"
<twetzel@thermoecotek.com>, "Sue Mara" <smara@enron.com>, "Steven Kelley"
<steven@iepa.com>, "Steve Ponder" <steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "Stephanie Newell"
<stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "Roger Pelote"
<roger.pelote@williams.com>, "Robert Lamkin" <rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>,
"Richard Hyde" <rwhyde@duke-energy.com>, "Paula Soos"
<paula_soos@ogden-energy.com>, "Nam Nguyen" <nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>, "Marty
McFadden" <marty_mcfadden@ogden-energy.com>, "Lynn Lednicky"
<lale@dynegy.com>, "kent Palmerton" <kent.palmerton@williams.com>, "Ken
Hoffman" <khoffman@caithnessenergy.com>, "Kassandra Gough"
<kgough@calpine.com>, "Jonathan Weisgall" <jweisgall@aol.com>, "John Stout"
<john_h_stout@reliantenergy.com>, "Joe Ronan" <joer@calpine.com>, "Joe Greco"
<joe.greco@uaecorp.com>, "Jim Willey" <elliottsa@earthlink.net>, "Jeff
Dasovich" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>, "Jack Pigott" <jackp@calpine.com>, "Hap
Boyd" <rboyd@enron.com>, "Greg Blue" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "Frank DeRosa"
<fderosa@sanfrancisco.usgen.com>, "Ed Tomeo" <ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>, "Duane
Nelson" <dnelsen@msn.com>, "David Parquet" <dparque@ect.enron.com>, "Curtis
Kebler" <curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "Carolyn Baker"
<cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "Bob Escalante" <rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "Bob
Ellery" <bellery@spi-ind.com>, "Bill Woods" <billw@calpine.com>, "Bill
Carlson" <william_carlson@wastemanagement.com>, "Craig Chancellor"
<craigc@calpine.com>, "Eric Eisenman" <eric.eisenman@gen.pge.com>, "Kate
Castillo" <ccastillo@riobravo-gm.com>
		 cc: "Jan Smutny Jones" <smutny@iepa.com>, "Steven Kelley" <steven@iepa.com>,
"Katie Kaplan" <kaplan@iepa.com>
		 Subject: AB 18x

Attached is the newly introduced AB 18x (Hertzberg) and the committee
analysis.

AB 1x (Keeley) as amended yesterday will be available later this morning
when the Senate Appropriations Committee meets at 10 am.

Julee Malinowski-Ball
Senior Associate
Edson + Modisette
916-552-7070
FAX-552-7075
jmball@ns.net

 - abx1_18_bill_20010125_introduced.pdf
 - ANALYSIS.ab18x.doc


A Form 8-K regarding Constellation Energy Group, Inc. has been filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.   Click on the following hyperlink to view this filing:  http://investor.constellationenergy.com/ireye/ir_site.zhtml?ticker=ceg&script=19 01    Please Note: The hyperlink for the filing may not retrieve the filing if  the address extends to more than one line. If this should occur, please  copy the full text of the address for the filing into the address box in  your web browser.  ____________________________________________________________

This email alert service uses proprietary JoinMail list management software provided by CCBN. To learn more about JoinMail, visit the CCBN Website @: www.ccbn.com

To unsubscribe from this JoinMail list, please click on the link below and send a blank reply:   U-B2.9067.109483.paulzQ4dzQ4thomaszQ2enronzQ4com@joinmail.ccbn.com


Louise:

Discussions are heating up with Montana, and as such we have started to negotiate with Westinghouse a resolution to the generator claim. Please let me know if you have any update on CALME.

We intend to proceed with Montana and Westinghouse and cut the best deal for Enron Corp. Any definitive deal will of course require a DASH and your approval. Please let me know, however, if we need to slow these discussions down until we're fully resolved with CALME.

Regards,

Ben
---------------------- Forwarded by Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT on 03/31/2001 08:47 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.  From:  Ben F Jacoby                           03/28/2001 07:25 PM

Sent by:	Ben Jacoby
To:	Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:	W David Duran/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject:	Re:

Louise:

My responses:

1. The carrying costs have been capitalized, and under the accounting rules will continue to be capitalized through the last payment date under the turbine contract.

2. At this time, the turbine value is undetermined. While we have identified one potential counterparty (Montana Power), we do not have a signed deal. In addition, we are in the middle of a contract dispute with Westinghouse regarding the damaged generator. While we hope to resolve this dispute in the context of our exiting the turbine position, there exists the potential of this going into litigation.

3. Janet and I proposed the deal I discussed with you to CALME in December, but never got a formal response. I have put in several calls to Elio Tortolero at CALME, but have not heard from him for about a month. He advised me at that time that he would get me a counter proposal. My group has had de facto management responsibility for the unit since December.

4. This unit was initially an ENA unit, but was taken by CALME (David Haug) I believe in December '99 for projects they were considering. I am not aware of the terms of that transfer.

FYI, I have attached a payment schedule for the turbine.

Please let me know if you have any other questions. Also, I have attached an updated site bank map which includes our Texas site which was inadvertently left off the previous e-mail.

Regards,

Ben

Louise Kitchen
03/28/2001 08:56 AM
To:	Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

This was the response from Jim - if you have all the answers already - please give me a ring - otherwise can you pull the answers together and then give me a ring.

Thanks

Louise

Louise:

I need to know two things: (1) Have the carrying costs been expensed through Jan. 1 and (2) Is there commercial value to the turbine?  If there is value to the turbine, then I really don't understand allocating costs to a business unit that doesn't own the turbine in order to create the illusion of a profitable transaction.  I also need to know on what basis and against what agreement CALME agreed to bear the carrying costs.  The project it supposedly related to has been dead for several years.

Jim

<Embedded StdOleLink>


Julian,

The "Confirmation" will be the actual written Confirmation, which confirms in
writing the terms of the deal agreed to on the phone.  I don't know if what
they're looking for is a form of Confirmation (not deal specific) of what a
Confirmation might look like if they did a trade, or if you actually have
done or are proposing a particular trade and need to see the Confirmation
filled in with the proposed deal terms.  I left Roni Cappadonna with Duke a
voicemail asking her which specifically she was looking for.  As soon as I
hear from her I'll get her what she needs.  If you have any more questions,
email me back, or call.  I'm at your service!


GN -

I don't know Cuzin' Eric's new e-mail, so you'll have to pass this on to him
. . .
this weekend Buckcherry is one of the bands playing for a local radio
station's Memorial Day bash.  I guess you guys came to Des Moines on the
wrong weekend . . .

Matthew R Gillaspie
Public Finance Associate
U S Bancorp Piper Jaffray
700 Walnut Street, Ste 1300
Des Moines, Iowa  50309
(515) 247-2353
(800) 333-6008
mgillaspie02@pjc.com

______________________________________________________________________

http://www.piperjaffray.com

Investment products purchased from or through U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray:

    ---------------------------------------------------------
    * Not FDIC-insured * No bank guarantee * May lose value *
    ---------------------------------------------------------

http://www.piperjaffray.com/disclosure.asp - See For Additional Disclosure
Information
______________________________________________________________________


here is another request for a direct EOL data feed.  We should figure out how
we want to respond to such inquiries.  I have never heard of this company
before.

Dave

----- Forwarded by Dave Samuels/HOU/ECT on 01/23/2001 12:20 PM -----

	Graham Mansfield <gmansfield@kalahari.co.uk>
	01/23/2001 05:47 AM

		 To: "'dave.samuels@enron.com'" <dave.samuels@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re API for Enron Online

Good Day to you.
I would like to introduce myself and my company.
Kalahari Ltd is a UK based software company that has for the past 14
years been supply pricing software to the Financial Markets.
Over the past year we have been branching out into the energy markets
and are currently working for a number of UK based Electricity
companies.
One such company (London Electricity) has asked us to produce software
to filter and highlight online trading prices. This allows them to see
ONLY the best price in the market for any one product at a time. This is
due to the sudden explosion of internet based price delivery systems. To
enable us to acieve their requirements we require an API to the relative
online trading systems. Today I spoke to a gentlemen in your call centre
who gave me your contact details. Could you please advise me if you do
indeed publish an API to your internet trading platform and if so how do
I go about getting it.
We would of course be prepared to sign a non disclosure agreement in
this respect.

I look forward to hearing from you in due course.

With kind regards

Graham Mansfield
Deputy Managing Director

Kalahari Limited
Tel: +44 (0)1483 756246
Fax:+44 (0)1483 756300

www.kalahari.co.uk

> **********************************************************************
> *********
> The information in this Internet e-mail is confidential and may be
> legally privileged.  It is intended solely for the addressee.  Access
> to this Internet e-mail by anyone else is unauthorised and any
> disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be
> taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
>
> Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender
> except where they are stated to be the views of Kalahari Ltd.
> **********************************************************************
> *********
>


Why is Jean Mrha an alternate?
---------------------- Forwarded by John Hodge/Corp/Enron on 05/07/2001 12:52 PM ---------------------------
From:	Jean Mrha/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/07/2001 12:50 PM
To:	John Hodge/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:	Frank W Vickers/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject:	FW: Request Submitted: Access Request for john.hodge@enron.com

FYI.  I do not know if I should be listed as the alternate.

Regards, Jean
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	ARSystem <ARSystem@mailman.enron.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-ARSystem+20+3CARSystem+40mailman+2Eenron+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Monday, May 07, 2001 9:05 AM
To:	Mrha, Jean
Subject:	Request Submitted: Access Request for john.hodge@enron.com

You have received this email because the requester specified you as their Manager's alternate. Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000033103&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000033103
Approver            : kimberly.bates@enron.com
Request Create Date : 5/7/01 9:04:57 AM
Requested For       : john.hodge@enron.com
Resource Name       : Market Data CQG
Resource Type       : Applications


I don't have any idea.  For some reason this has taken over a month to get them set up.

ds
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hall, Steve C. (Legal)
Sent:	Monday, October 01, 2001 10:01 AM
To:	Hansen, Leslie
Cc:	Scholtes, Diana; Rosman, Stewart
Subject:	FW: Douglas Co. PUD

Any insight on what is holding this up?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Scholtes, Diana
Sent:	Monday, October 01, 2001 9:31 AM
To:	Hall, Steve C. (Legal)
Cc:	Rosman, Stewart
Subject:	Douglas Co. PUD

Douglas County has been trying to get signed up with EOL for over a month.  From what the Help Desk is telling me, they believe its sitting with legal at this point.  Can you please assist us in getting their paperwork finished?

Much appreciated!

Diana Scholtes
West Power
503-464-3807


I'm very very good.  But, acting very very bad!

-----Original Message-----
From: Christina R-C [mailto:christina_122367@hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 1:38 PM
To: Lucci, Paul T.
Subject: RE: Happenin'?

Do you deserve one?  Have you been very good, or very bad?  I need to know
what kind of spanking to give you!

>From: "Lucci, Paul T." <Paul.T.Lucci@ENRON.com>
>To: "Christina R-C" <christina_122367@hotmail.com>
>Subject: RE: Happenin'?
>Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 14:25:22 -0600
>
>ME!
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Christina R-C [mailto:christina_122367@hotmail.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 1:24 PM
>To: plucci@enron.com
>Subject: Happenin'?
>
>
>Who wants a spanking?
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
>http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>
>
>
>**********************************************************************
>This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
>and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
>the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
>others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
>authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
>reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
>all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
>intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
>binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
>affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
>relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
>Thank you.
>**********************************************************************

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


?
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
																											[IMAGE]

																						Enerfax Daily

														[IMAGE]
																															[IMAGE]
																										[IMAGE]
																																[IMAGE]

																																	[IMAGE]

																																					[IMAGE]

																															Looking  for a past article or issue. Click here to use Sagewave's  Search.

																														Enerfax  Daily? -? Page  ? -? November 20,  2000

																																				[IMAGE]

																																		[IMAGE]

																																			Enerfax  Daily? -?  Page 4? -?  November 20, 2000 -? ?  Past  Issues
Available on Sagewave

																																					[IMAGE]

																															[IMAGE]

																Total to Build Deep-Water Gulf of
																Mexico Gathering System

																? ? TotalFinaElf plans to construct a natural gas  gathering project with its
north American partners in the Gulf of  Mexico, enabling the development of
three deep offshore natural gas  fields. The project consisted of a 56-mile
pipeline with a  transmission capacity of 500 MMcf per day and a processing
platform,  owned and operated by Williams.? Construction of the Canyon
Express pipeline, in the Mississippi Canyon area about 120 miles  southeast
of New Orleans, will begin next year. The gathering system  will begin
operating in summer 2002, at the same time as the three  natural gas fields,
Aconcagua, King's Peak and Camden Hills. Canyon  Express was a major
technological breakthrough for TotalFinaElf,  making it possible to undertake
oil and natural gas operations at  previously untapped depths of over 6,000
feet. The gas gathering  system will be operated by Elf Exploration and
belong to the  companies who owned the Aconcagua, King's Peak and Camden
Hills  fields. Aconcagua is operated by Elf Exploration which has a 50%
stake in the field. Enron affiliate, Mariner Energy, and Pioneer  Natural
Resources each own 25%. King's Peak is wholly-owned and  operated by BP
Amoco. Camden Hills is operated by Marathon, with a  50% stake. Total
Exploration Production USA owns 16.67% and Pioneer  owns 33.3%. Aconcagua
will own 45%; King's Peak, 35%; and Camden  Hills 20% of the Canyon Express
pipeline.

																																[IMAGE]

																			[IMAGE]																			[IMAGE]

																	[IMAGE]
																	[IMAGE]

																	Slow browser ? Try? the speedy
																	searchable version at
																	http://www.enernetenergy.com  and click on the light bulb for Enerfax Daily -
Power and Natural Gas Pricing  & Articles and click the oil well for
																	Enerfax GOLD- Gas, Oil,
																	Liquids, & Derivatives' Pricing and  Articles

																	[IMAGE]

																	[IMAGE]

																																									[IMAGE]
																																			[IMAGE]
																																						[IMAGE]
																																						[IMAGE]

																																	NYMEX Natural Gas Futures Reportable Positions as of  11/14/00

																																	10,000
MMbtu? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?  ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?  ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?  ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
?  ?Open Interest: 396,255

																																	? ? ? ? ? ? ?  ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?  ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?  ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?  ? ? ?
? ? ? ? ? ?  ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?  ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?  ? ? ?
Non-Reportable? ? ? ?  ? ? ? ?Non-
Commercial? ? ? ? ? ?  ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?  ?Commercial? ? ? ? ? ? ?  ? ? ? ?
Total? ? ? ? ?  ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?  ?Positions

																																	Long? ? ?|? Short? |  Spreading? ? ? ? ? ? ?Long?  ?
|? ?Short? ? ? ? ?  ?Long? ? |? ?Short? ? ?  ? ? ? ? ?Long? ?|?  ?Short

																																	20,977?  ? 6,960? ? ?23,146? ? ? ?  ? ? ? 308,267? ?340,882? ? ?
352,390? ?370,988? ? ? ? ?  43,865? ? 25,267

																																	Changes From  11/07/00 (Change in Open Interest: 14,081)

																																	7,001? ? -2,359? ?  ? -1,952? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?  ? 2,343? ? ?15,938? ? ? ? ? ?  ?
? ? ? ? 7,392? ? ?  ?11,627? ? ? ? ? ?6,689?  ? ? 2,454

																																	Open Interest  for Each Category of Traders

																																	5.3%?  ? ?1.8 %? ? ? ?5.8%? ?  ? ? ? ? ? ? 77.8%? ?  ?86.0 %? ? ? ? ? 88.9
%? ?  ? ?93.6%? ? ? ? ?11.1%?  ? ?6.4%

																																	Number of  Traders in Each Category
																																	? ? 48? ? ?  ? ? ?12? ? ? ? ?
33?  ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?  ? ? ?91? ? ? ? ?  ?86? ? ? ? ? ? ?
151?  ? ? ? ? ?122? ?  ?

																																							[IMAGE]

																																								Enerfax  Daily? -?  Page 7? -?  November 20, 2000

																																						[IMAGE]

																																							Enerfax  Daily? -?  Page 8? -?  November 20, 2000

																																					[IMAGE]

																													(Continued from page 7)

																													undeveloped  frontier areas, he said. The highway route is being promoted by
Foothills Pipe Lines while Arctic Resources is promoting the  Beaufort Sea
route. The North Slope has natural gas reserves of over  35 Tcf, and many
believe the potential reserves could exceed 100  Tcf. Currently, oil
producers produce about 8 MMcf per day of  natural gas and re-inject almost
all of it into oil reservoirs to  build up pressure there and enhance future
recovery.

																																					[IMAGE]

																																		Financial Summary

																																								[IMAGE]

																												")} TC
																								[IMAGE]

 - blnk.gif
 - img17.gif
 - img18.gif
 - img19.gif
 - img20.gif
 - img21.gif
 - img22.gif
 - img23.gif
 - img24.gif
 - img25.gif
 - img26.gif
 - img27.gif
 - img28.gif
 - img29.gif
 - img30.gif
 - img31.gif
 - img32.gif
 - img33.gif
 - img34.gif
 - img35.gif
 - img36.gif
 - img37.gif
 - img10.gif
 - img38.gif
 - id=1381847
 - img39.gif


ED:  what is this all about?  Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 12/01/2000 11:58 AM -----

	Janelle Scheuer
	12/01/2000 11:09 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: RFP: Orange and Rockland Utilities

Hi Sara...I'm forwarding an RPF fron ConEd New York, Inc......
We are only looking to do Proposal #1.....basically we will quote on:
Cal 01
50 - 100 MW
5 X 16 peak
Zone G, NY
Financial swap

Included in the RFP is their sample Energy purchase agreement, can you please
take a look and make any necessary comments?
The RFP is due Dec. 8.
Thanks,
Janelle

"Forte, Michael" <FORTEM@coned.com> on 11/30/2000 09:26:04 AM
To: "Forte, Michael" <FORTEM@coned.com>
cc:

Subject: RFP: Orange and Rockland Utilities

    Attached for your review and consideration is a Request-for-Proposals
for firm electric energy for Orange and Rockland Utilities.

 <<ORU RFP_2001.doc>>
Thank you and have a great day!
Michael
Voice:  (212) 460-3537
Fax:    (917) 534-4042
Mobile: (914) 319-5348
Pager:  1-800-946-4646 (pin:142 64 67)

 - ORU RFP_2001.doc


We would like to thank you for your time yesterday allowing us to make you
aware of the Buildscape initiative and potential opportunities for Enron,
Dow and Buildscape to partner and develop the web based services for the
residential building industry in NA that would lead to a tremendous market
offering for the users/customers of the web solution as well as the market
access and services that could be made available through this new business
entity.

The potential synergy of the Buildscape market rollout and web based
technology platform with the Enron capabilities and market making
functionality and Dow's position in the Building industry as a major
manufacturer/supplier would be a powerful combination and I would like to
recommend a follow up meeting to discuss the options around strategic
investment interests and alliance after you have had a chance to regroup
after yesterday's meetings. The possibilities exist today for Enron to join
Dow as a major investor/partner in Buildscape.

Rob, you mentioned that you will be visiting the NAHB show this weekend. Dow
and Buildscape are also participating and our VP for Building Products
Business - John Schaw who was on the original conference call will be there
as well and we would like to arrange a meeting between John and yourself. I
will ask his assistant Marcy Putt to try to contact you and see whether a
meeting can be setup possibly for Saturday.

Jeff,  James Mason and I were also pleased to meet with you to discuss
global market opportunities on a broader sense between Enron and Dow and we
will follow with a meeting between yourself and Pedro Reinhard( CFO) in
Midland at the earliest convenience.

I have attached the Buildscape presentation from yesterday for your review
and follow up to complement the documents previously sent.

 <<BuildscapeEnron.ppt>>

Best Regards,

Carlo
Carlo Guarino
Global Development Director
Dow Growth Center

Office  (517) 636-0860 / Mobile (313)655-7553
Fax      (517) 636-1453
Internet address: CGuarino@dow.com

 - BuildscapeEnron.ppt


Thanks.  I have suggested to OPIC/KFW that perhaps S&W should listen in.
We'll see if they had time to arrange it.  If not we will follow up after.

Regards,

Laine A Powell@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
01/16/2001 04:35 PM
To: Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Banks Eng - New Status

Rob -

 I have not spoken to anyone since we discussed doing this together.  I asked
John G. to join the call with the lenders tomorrow.

rgds

laine

Rob G Gay@ENRON
01/16/2001 05:57 PM
To: Laine A Powell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Re: Banks Eng - New Status

I am going to talk with them tomorrow at 8:30 CST.  You can join if you
like.  Have you talked to Brad or Sue at S&W?

Laine A Powell@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
01/12/2001 05:58 AM
To: Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Blanca Bollom/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Banks Eng - New Status

Rob -

 I am available to call the Banks Eng and/or OPIC today after 11 am your time
until say 2 pm your time.  Does this work for you?  I can be reached at 55 65
9981-6071.

rgds

Laine


Please see the attached memo.

Attachments:


Lee:

Looks good except I've gotten approval based on unit #19 being delivered on
May 15, based on our discussion last week. I'm happy to go back, but I think
the payment schedule should tie to the unit delivery; i.e. either push the
payment schedule back, or move the unit delivery date forward.

Let me know how you want to proceed.

Thanks,

Ben

lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com on 09/13/2000 09:26:39 AM
To: ben.f.jacoby@enron.com
cc: kathleen.clark@enron.com
Subject: FW: Change Order #3

Here's the change order for the schedule change related to LV Cogen II
units.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)
> Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 4:26 PM
> To: Johnson, Lee L (PS, SSEP); 'chris.booth@enron.com';
> 'kay.mann@enron.com'
> Subject: Change Order #3
>
> Lee, Chris and Kay:
>
> Attached is a draft of the Change Order #3 for the Las Vegas Cogen
> project.  Kay, I will be in Houston on Monday through Wednesday afternoon,
> but will be busy most of Tuesday.  Lee had hoped that we could get
> together, or at least talk, about this and the facility agreement and
> payment for Change Order #2.  How is your late Monday afternoon looking?
>
> Kent
>
>  <<Amendment Number 3.doc>>

 - Amendment Number 3.doc


Please be informed, Steve Harris and the TW Commercial Group will temporarily relocated to the 13th floor effective Monday, September 24, 2001.   Our present meeting location on the 41st floor will not be available for the weekly staff meetings.  Since this is  the case, we have reserved a conference room on the 13th floor to meet on Monday afternoons.

Please meet at the same time, 2:30p in Enron Center North (ECN) 1336.   Glen, we will conference you in by phone.

For your information, I will list all of our Team Members new locations:

		Steve Harris		ECN	1338
		Audrey Robertson	ECN	1337
		Kim Watson		ECN	1346
		Lindy Donoho		ECN	1337a
		Lorraine Lindberg	ECN	1341a
		TK Lohman		ECN	1341
		Michelle Lokay		ECN	1342
		Mark McConnell 	ECN	1343
		Jan Moore		ECN	1340
		Paul Y'Barbo 		ECN	1344

Please call if you have questions.

Thanks in advance,

Audrey D. Robertson
Transwestern Pipeline Company
email address:  audrey.robertson@enron.com
(713) 853-5849
(713) 646-2551 Fax


I have ceated deal 163005 to cover the flow for Feb

D

Jackie Young
02/04/2000 03:28 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: 98-1534

Daren,

The above mentioned meter (delivery) shows a small flow of 24 dec. on
2-1-00.  The sitara deal (151694) has a stop date of 1/31/2000.

Can you please extend the deal thru 2-1-00 to cover this small volume?

Thanks
-Jackie-


Here are some PEAKER articles I found in DJ Interactive.  Hope this helps
dude, take it easy and we'll talk later.

Douglas Moreno
eSource
3-7287


> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Steve Casey
> Sent:	Friday, December 21, 2001 8:52 AM
> To:	'Jonathan.McKay@ENRON.com'
> Cc:	'Chance.Rabon@enron.com'
> Subject:	Quotes21.xls
>
>  <<Quotes21.xls>>

 - Quotes21.xls


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 03/19/2001
10:12 AM ---------------------------
From: Russell Diamond/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/19/2001 09:32 AM
To: Janie Aguayo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron, Derek
Bailey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean Bell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Patricia Boulanger/CAL/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie
Brewer/NA/Enron@Enron, Lesli Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Celeste
Cisneros/NA/Enron@Enron, Sharon Crawford/CAL/ECT@ECT, Richard
Deming/NA/Enron@Enron, Russell Diamond/ENRON@enronXgate, Cindy
Feldman/CAL/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Veronica
Gonzalez/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Walter
Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate, Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam
Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol
McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Nidia Mendoza/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Bianca Ornelas/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie
Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Linda Sietzema/CAL/ECT@ECT, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ellen
Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON, Melinda Whalen/CAL/ECT@ECT, Tiffany
Williams/NA/Enron@Enron, Veronica Espinoza/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:
Subject: Credit Report 3/19/01

Counterparty    TAGG#   Action
AEP Energy Services, Inc.  qX4934.1  Rebook to AEP Energy Services, Inc.
 "    qX4285.1   "
Blue Star Resources, Ltd  qV3059.5  Pending Jay Williams
El Paso Energy Corporation  qX5675.1  Rebook to El Paso Merchant Energy LP
Husky Gas Marketing Inc.  qX5508.1  Rebook to Husky Oil Operations Limited
Louis Dreyfus Natural Gas Holdings qX5624.1  Louis Dreyfus Corporation
NGL Supply, Inc. dba Premier Enter. qX5790.1  Credit Previously Provided
National Fuel Resources, Inc.  qX5260.1  Pending Rudwell Johnson
Newton Paper Company, Inc.  qX5921.1  "Need L/C" language required in the
confirm
 "    qX5922.1   "
PG&E Energy Trading, Canada Co qX4420.1  Rebook ENA to ECC, under the ISDA
PanCanadian Energy Inc.  qX4599.1  Rebook to PanCanadian Energy Services Inc.
 "    qX4637.1   "
 "    qX4644.1   "
Paribas     qX4182.1  Rebook to BNP Paribas
Pickens Fuel Corp   qP0007.2   Pending Brant Reves
 "    qX0714.4.5.7.9.A.B  "
 "    qX5188.1   "
Smurfit Packaging Corp.   qX5745.1,qX5798.1,qX5917.1 Credit Previously
Provided
Texaco Inc.    qX5487.1  Rebook to Texaco Natural Gas Inc.
Utilicorp United Inc.   qX4981.1  Rebook to Aquila Risk Management Corp.


Lindy,
I have made a few suggestions to your letter please review, I wanted to make clear that TW would accept nominations as usual but it would be SoCal's decision to only confirm beginning at the evening cycle. I hope it did not add a negative connotation to your letter because I know you want it to be positive so do not feel obligated to use my suggestions.
I have talked to Mary Draemer about the EDI issue and she will give me a date that TW can start accepting confirmations from SoCal via EDI for the Topock point. Before EDI starts the point could be manually confirmed.

Thanks: John Buchanan


August 18, 2000

     Teco Tap       20.000 / Enron ; 114.167 / HPL IFERC

     LS HPL LSK IC       20.000 / Enron

August 19, 2000

     Teco Tap       20.000 / Enron ; 96.667 / HPL IFERC

     LS HPL LSK IC       20.000 / Enron

August 20, 2000

     Teco Tap       20.000 / Enron ; 102.500 / HPL IFERC

     LS HPL LSK IC       20.000 / Enron


al,
i am forwarding you a resume of john griffith,, he was at energy sources
and then PG & E, currently at Enron
wonderfully nice guy, knows of you obviously,, friend of Kim too
has been trading options for last 3-5 years

he is good guy and if you need help, take a look

John Harris Griffith
(See attached file: New Resume.doc)

 - New Resume.doc


Dan

I've had some feedback .... take a look at this .... changes look OK to me,
particularly the second one!!  They're the ones who wanted it in the first
place ...

Lee

---------------------- Forwarded by Lee L Papayoti/HOU/ECT on 01/05/2001
02:35 PM ---------------------------

Karen K Gruber <Karen_K_Gruber@Engelhard.com> on 01/05/2001 02:20:45 PM
To: "Lee Papayoti (E-mail)" <Lee.L.Papayoti@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Status of Natural Gas Contract - Engelhard

We are finally nearing the end of the review. I am currently demanding a
final response from our legal beagles on the indemnification issue since the
two cannot come to an agreement so far.? As for the rest of the agreement,
here are two changes that we discussed earlier on the phone:

ADD the following sentence at the end of the first paragraph in Enfolio
Master Firm Purchase/Sale Agreement?? "This agreement and all other
transactions are for sales of gas to the Engelhard Corporation Pasadena,
Texas location only."

DELETE the second sentence that was added in the Daily Contract Quantity
(DCQ) section on the Transaction agreement.?? (Seller acknowledges and agrees
that the provisions of Section 3.4 of the ENFOLIO Master Firm Purchase/Sale
Agreement shall not apply so long as Buyer purchases the DCQ from Seller
under the pricing terms provided below.)?? Our lawyers found this confusing.

I apologize for our late response.?

Hope you had an enjoyable holiday.

Best regards

Karen Gruber
Engelhard Corporation


Hi Kenneth:

Find out how your company can reap the rewards of eBusiness Integration by
attending STC's eBusiness Integration Conference.

STC is the leading global provider of eBusiness Integration Solutions.? With
nearly 1400 customers at more than 1600 sites worldwide,? STC has a
successful, ten-year track record and has helped world-class organizations
achieve the following:

??????????????? Automate real-time and intelligent exchange of information
??????????????? Manage critical business processes across the entire value
chain
??????? Optimize supply and demand webs
??????????????? Improve customer relationships

Agenda:? Come and spend the morning with us and stay for lunch if you can!?
??????????????? Learn more about STC's product offerings and how eBusiness
Integration can make your company a leader.

8:00 am - 8:30 am ????? Continental Breakfast
8:30 am - 12:00 pm ???? Conference
???????????????? STC Corporate Overview and Strategy ??
???????????????? STC Product Suite Overview
???????????????? Industry Marketing Strategy and Value Propositions
??????? ??????? -Telco, Financial Services, Manufacturing, Utilities
???????? STC Product Presentations and Demonstrations:
??????????????????????????????? - e*Gate Integrator, our award winning
integration offering
??????????????????????????????? - e*Xchange Integrator, our Business Process
Management and B2B Integration solution
??????????????????????????????? - e*Index Global Identifier, our latest
offering that enables customer record matching across disparate customer
databases

12:00 pm - 1:30 pm ???? Lunch

Where/When:
?????????????? Monday October 23: New York area
?????????????? Tuesday October 24: Washington DC area
?????????????? Wednesday October 25: Chicago area
?????????????? Thursday October 26: Dallas area
?????????????? Friday October 27: Los Angeles area

Register by October 16, 2000 to get a FREE tailored value proposition from
STC Strategic Services.
(If public financial information on your organization is not available a
short interview will be necessary.)

For more detailed information and to register go to?
http://www.stc.com/promo/conference

See you there!

STC


This is good.  I need to try it.
----- Forwarded by Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT on 04/03/2001 03:40 PM -----

	Pat Radford
	04/03/2001 02:15 PM

		 To: Kaye Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jenny Helton/HOU/ECT@ect, Dan J
Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda J Noske/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Joyce Dorsey/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Erica Braden/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Dina Snow/Corp/Enron@Enron,
mnabors@flash.net, aeanabors@aol.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Why men don't do windows

This is HILARIOUS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Pat Radford
Enron North America Corp.
EB3869
713-853-9282
----- Forwarded by Pat Radford/HOU/ECT on 04/03/2001 02:13 PM -----

	Kimberlee A Bennick
	04/03/2001 01:42 PM

		 To: Mary Ogden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Radford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Becky
Spencer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda R
Guinn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Genia FitzGerald/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terrie
Wheeler/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Marlo C James/HOU/ECT@ECT, cattaurus@hotmail.com,
Marilyn Colbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cheryl Dudley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cathy
Sprowls/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patricia Downey/HOU/EES@EES
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Why men don't do windows

-

> > > >
>
>  <<Why men don't do Windows.mpe>>

 - Why men don't do Windows.mpe


Call me when you get a chance please.


The Legal Technology Committee presents the legal portal, the Enron Legal
Edge, a single point access to tools needed
to perform your work.

????????????????????????????????????????? ????? ??????? Enron Legal Edge
????????????????????????????????????????? http://legaledge.corp.enron.com/

ole0.bmp

Information about the Enron Legal Edge is included in the attached file. Not
all of the available content will appear on

the site, so follow the directions on the User Guide to create an ID and
customize the portal appearance for your use
and to select the content you want to see.?

Check out the site, use the information from the attached handout and on the
portal site to help you get around!

 <<Portal Handout.doc>>

 - ole0.bmp
 - Portal Handout.doc


Congratulations Dave!  You're the king!

Fletch


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kissinger, Bertha  On Behalf Of Nelson, Dennis
> Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 3:42 PM
> To: Glaser, Steve; DeConcini, Mike; Hutchens, David
> Subject: FW: Feinstein draft energy bill
> Importance: High
>
> Dennis would like each of you to look at the draft legislation and provide
> any comments you may have and leave your comments on his voice mail.  He
> will be checking his voice mail tomorrow.
>
> He knows TEP opposes the price caps.  He would like you to skim the
> provision regulating natural gas and provide feedback.
>
> If you are unable to open the attachment, please let me know and I can fax
> a copy to you.
>
>   Bertha (for Dennis)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marsan, William P. [SMTP:william.marsan@troutmansanders.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 1:58 PM
> To: Nelson, Dennis
> Subject: Feinstein draft energy bill
>
> Dennis- Kevin Moran sent me this draft of Sen. Feinstein's energy bill and
> would like TEP's comments.  Let's talk about it before out meeting
> tomorrow
> with him and Chris Kearney.  Bill
>
> > ----------
> > From:  RIGHTFAX E-MAIL GATEWAY
> > Sent:  Tuesday, March 27, 2001 3:02 PM
> > To:  Marsan, William P.
> > Subject:  A new fax has arrived from 202 224 2207
> >
> >  <<A0005B78.TIF>>
> > Time: 03/27/01 03:00PM
> > Received from remote ID: 202 224 2207
> > Inbound user ID MARSANWP, routing code 5616
> > Result: (0/352;0/0) Successful Receive
> > Page record: 1 - 8
> > Elapsed time: 02:00 on channel 5
> >  <<A0005B78.TIF>>

 - A0005B78.TIF


Per my call and your response.

On Arcos - the horse is out of the barn-  They start shipping turbine engines
in a month and the HRSG steel in less-

----- Forwarded by John G Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 04/17/2001 06:25 PM -----

	John G Rigby
	03/28/2001 09:26 AM

		 To: Bob Carter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sheila
Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Variations- Change Orders- GE - impacts on manufacturing- Need your
thoughts today .

One of the World Hunger issues is that GE does  not want Enron to be able to
issue a unilateral change order which would impact the manufacturing schedule.

We have the same issue in the Arcos Power Island deal.

Following is what I intend to propose to solve the Arcos problem and might
work  for World Hunger:

" Purchaser acknowledges taht Seller's ability to accomodate changes in
manufacturing scope in a timely or cost effective manner diminish as Seller
gets further along into the manufacturing process, and after a point changes
can only be made after assembly completion or in the field without adversely
affecting Seller's manufacturing obligations to other clients (a "Client
Impact").  Where such a Client Impact circumstance exists, Seller shall
identify such constraints to Purchaser in its proposal submitted pursuant to
Clause 17.2.(b) [time and cost estimate to accomodate the Change
Order-Variation Order], which Purchaser shall take into account in evaluating
Seller's proposed cost and time changes arising out of such Variation scope
change. "

I would appreciate your thoughts as to whether this works for us in the World
Hunger document-  I do  not want to propose for Arcos if it gives you great
difficultly for World Hunger.


PRC TIME IS HERE!!

There has been a very significant and positive change in the PRC Process!
Your employee profile will now be viewed during PRC Meetings where you are represented.  Therefore, it is very important that you update your information in the eHRonline system before May 25, 2001.

Instructions on updating info. in eHRonline:  To get into the eHRonline system pull up the Enron Home Page and click on eHRonline.enron.com.  Your user name is your P# (i.e. P########) and your pass word is your designated eHRonline pass word (if you don't know this call 5-4727).  Once in eHRonline click on Profile Information and update the areas that are incorrect.

If you have questions please call me @ 3-6019.
Please forward this message to anyone who was not included in the distribution.


As you may be aware, the Year-End PRC for 2000 is quickly approaching and
your assistance is needed in ensuring a smooth process.  It is imperative that
you supply your correct reviewing supervisor so you are represented properly
during reviews.  Additionally, the Performance Management team requires this
information to facilitate the PRC process.  The reviewing supervisor that you
report to as of October 1, 2000 is the person that will provide your year-end
individual performance feedback.

The information stored in our database regarding your current rotation is
listed
below.  Please review all information and make any updates to the right of
what was sent, preferably in a different font or color.  The supervisor listed
below is also receiving this information for review.

In order to meet the Performance Management Team's deadline, your reply is
needed by Friday, September 22, 2000.  Please respond even if the information
is correct and no adjustments are necessary.  If you will be in a different
department as of October 1st, please provide us with your new information and
reviewing supervisor.  We appreciate your assistance in this matter.

NOTE:  This would also be a great time for you to send an electronic copy of
your resume to this email address so the database is updated with your most
current resume.

Name           : Ben Rogers
E-mail         : Benjamin.Rogers@enron.com
Title          : Associate
Phone          : 3-7998
Location       : EB2963b
Department     : NA-Capital Structuring
Company Name   : ENA
Company Number : 0413
Cost Center    : 105729
Rotation Start : 8/1/2000
Rotation End   :
Reviewing Supervisor: Jeffrey Donahue

Thanks in advance for your cooperation.   Please feel free to call Shelly
Butler @
713-853-4584 or Jana Giovannini @ 713-853-9233 with any questions you might
have.


The LARS meeting, scheduled for August 21, will be at CA ISO in Folsom,
conference room 101A 1a & b from 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. If you cannot
attend, there will be conference call access at 877-670-4098, Pass code:
129329.

Sue Happ
Administrative Assistant
Client Relations
(916) 608-7059
shapp@caiso.com


A scathing AP article against Governor Davis concerning his inaction with the
California crisis. Davis is facing two issues. Sign the current rollback bill
that is going through the legislature and upset the energy industry, or veto
the bill and have many voters upset at him. Governor Davis is aware of the
upcoming elections for members in his party, as well as the 2002 governor
election and knows that his decision may cost himself and other members of
his party election wins. Also, there is now talks that during August 21st PUC
meeting the governor will suggest rate rollback for San Diego  to July 1998
rates. This is a complete 180 degree turn from his August 3rd PUC meeting
where he said he would steer clear of rate rollbacks or freezes and push for
only a rebate.

Attached is a personal interest type story providing the general publics view
of the whole California power situation.


please schedule
----- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 04/10/2001 09:13 AM -----

	John Schwartzenburg@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	04/09/2001 01:11 PM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EEOSC Update

I would like to schedule a tim on Wednesday afternoon with you to take you
through the EEOSC monthly report.  I will be out Thursday and Friday, so
thenext opportunity would be the following week. Nothing too urgent, I just
think you might wnat to know a little about what's going on over here.

JWVS


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 06/07/2000
06:35 PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital Management

	From:  David Baumbach                           05/03/2000 07:30 AM

To: Frank Cernosek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan
Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Troy Klussmann/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Intra Texas 0400 Liquidations

Price 771947
Basis 771948
GD 771976


Start Date: 4/29/01; HourAhead hour: 11;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042911.txt


Ben,

Your voice-mail requesting a new corporate guarantee is making this
transaction increasingly burdensome for us, unsettling the balance I
thought we had reached.  Call me tonight when you are out of your
hearings.  603-493-3314.

In the meantime, I'll review the doc's.

svh


Peter, Jeff,

I have talked to Clement about setting up a meeting to discuss ways that we
can help improve this process.  He is available any time on Thursday and
Friday, please let me know when you all are available.

Russell

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Keohane, Peter
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 1:06 PM
To: Hodge, Jeffrey
Cc: Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ENRON; Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ENRON; Haedicke, Mark
Subject: Enron Corp. G'ees

Jeff, as per my voice mail, Credit would like to follow up with a call with
Clement Abrams to facilitate the quality and timeliness of the review of
guarantees.  Mark Haedicke and I spoke to Rob Walls a few weeks back, but not
much has changed, and Credit is quite frustrated.  I will participate but do
not believe Mark needs to be involved at this level, however a senior trading
lawyer from Houston would be helpful as this is not a unique Canadian issue,
and I thought of you.  Tanya and Russell will set something up and let us
know.  Regards, Peter.