britt,

thanks your notes below.

re bug issue - noted. just one question; do you think we should notify our
suppliers in view that, if there is a problem as a result of the bugs, we
will have to proceed against them??? they would want to have a rep to view
the testing as well, i would think.

re joint testing - pls copy eric tan on what needs to be done once a decision
is made on where/when the testing will be done.

re freight payment - before offering to just pay the $500,000, do you think
we should propose it be paid to an interest bearing escrow account pending
the results of the joint testing (or whatever other "pending" limitation you
think might help us)??

rgds

From: Britt Davis@ENRON on 09/11/2000 07:26 PST
To: Paul Henking/SIN/ECT@ECT
cc: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael A
Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, James P
Studdert/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: In re M/V PACIFIC VIRGO

Paul,

Thanks for your e-mail.  Parenthetically, I'd be happy to explain how we got
to where we are on our strategy; maybe a telephone call would be best.  Let
me know when you are available.  I can call you early a.m. or late p.m.

Re the bug issue:  we were aware of this, although I am interested to hear
that SGS raised it with you and Eric in mid-October.  I have discussed this
in the past with David Best, and spoke with him on the telephone this morning
about what SGS told you.  We don't think we should put anyone on notice about
the bug issue unless and until it appears and is confirmed at the joint
testing.  Otherwise, we may be raising an inherent vice argument for both
Mitsubishi and our own cargo underwriters.   Let me know if you have a
different view (on this or anything else I put in this e-mail).

Re Mitsubishi's response to our settlement demand:  David Best has just
spoken with Sian Heard, Mitsubishi's lead London solicitor.  It is clear from
her that Mitsubishi will not be settling prior to instituting arbitration.
It is also clear that Mitsubishi will not consider any substantial settlement
without Heard's advice.  Best believes that Heard will recommend that the
joint testing take place before giving Mitsubishi an exposure evaluation.  In
sum, while our attempt at settlement prior to joint testing was a worthwhile
effort, to avoid the risk and expense of the problematic joint survey, it now
appears to David and me to be at a dead end.

Re the joint testing:  Again, David and I believe that the joint testing
should proceed as quickly as it can be arranged.  Neither our cargo
underwriters nor Mitsubishi will move off dead center unless we do so.  Given
the problems with SGS's lab in Singapore, the "bug" issue that SGS in Subic
Bay has raised (again), and that SGS did the pre-purchase of product for ECT
that proved off-spec, I have asked David to re-visit with Steve Jones, our
chemist, the logistics and cost of having the testing done in the U.K.  I
have also asked him to consider whether Heard might be amenable to splitting
the costs of transporting the samples from Singapore to the U.K.  I would
like to get ECT's authority quickly to authorize the joint testing to go
forward.

Re the selection of arbitrators:  David has discussed three Q.C.s that he and
Neale agreed were appropriate with Hearn.  Of those three, Hearn likes
Nicholas Hamblin, who will charge 275 pounds an hour, and $1,750 pounds per
day.  She will be conferring with Mitsubishi about using him as the sole
arbitrator.  Given that we have initiated a good-faith discussion of the
choice of arbitrators with Mitsubishi, David advises that we do not need to
worry about sending Mitsubishi a letter tomorrow with our choices of
arbitrator on it.  We can wait for Hearn to respond, then I will make a
formal request for your authority to agree to one arbitrator who has already
been accepted by Mitsubishi.

Re the without-prejudice settlement of Mitsubishi's freight and demurrage:  I
read you loud and clear (and thanks for making clear that the freight claim
is only about $500,000, not $760,000, as I had inadvertantly indicated in my
last e-mail).  As I previously mentioned, David and I are on board with this
idea, given the difficult circumstances of this case.

Let me know if I have inadvertantly mischaracterized anything you said.

Britt

	Paul Henking@ECT
	11/09/2000 02:25 AM

		 To: Britt Davis/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael A
Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, James P
Studdert/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: In re M/V PACIFIC VIRGO

britt,

thanks your reply which is noted. you will notice i have excluded david best
and ngregson (?) preferring to keep my comments in house as privileged info,
unless you feel this msg should be forwarded to them later.

firstly, i am getting nowhere with mitsubishi on the settlement front. i have
gone so far as to mention this morning to mitsuru that if this does goes to
arbitration, and should mitsubishi succeed in their position, this will only
serve to increase our claim by a similar amount since these costs would then
become part of our contamination claim. he seems quite content to let this go
to arbitration. as an example, he was suppose to call me back this afternoon
but did not.

secondly, with regards to your comments, i would just respond/add the
following information:

1. i don't know if i am switching tactics so much as following what should
have been done in the beginning (i.e. submit the claim to our insurance
company and let them proceed against the owners). i honestly feel the
arbitrators will say, "pay the freight (and possibly the demurrage now) and
settle the contamination claim as a separate issue". clearly, the c/p says
that freight is due without deduction once the vessel has completed discharge.

on the issue of the "pre-sale" survey, i have discussed this matter
internally with eric tan. seems our position is that singapore considered the
sample that was drawn as a bad sample as well as we were not sure that the
test methods used conformed with the testing methods required for first gas.
this position is proved by the loading of the pacific virgo when the product
subsequently tested on-spec for first gas. granted, it might still become an
issue but, as you say. it could become an issue in either proceeding.

i am getting a little confused on the matter of the joint testing. verbally i
was advised that enron did not want to have the joint testing - at least not
on a prompt basis. your msg now says that we do want to test the product and
it should be done as soon as possible (as mitsubishi - and your advices that
the underwriters and hear owner's p and i club would want). i assume this
change is the result of the arbitration.

be that as it may, i do have a bit of information that you may, or may not,
be aware of or find relevant. when eric tan and i visited first gas in
mid-oct to meet the personnel at first gas and witness one of the cargoes
being discharged at the plant, we also took the opportunity to meet with sgs
in subic bay to see their facilities and meet their personnel. during the
conversation the subject of the elang cargo came up and the comment from sgs
is that they were fairly certain it was off-spec due to "bugs". this may
sound silly but i have heard of this before and is a problem with petroleum
products.

it seems sgs even went so far as to test the product themselves for these
"bugs" and got a positive result. this test was not requested by enron or
first gas and was done some time later in this process. i understand there
may be some concern on our part over our subsequent sales to third parties if
we knew there were bugs in the product. i would have to say that this was not
known at the time and even today is only conjecture based on sgs' advices
mid-oct (well after these sales). sgs also described "changes" to the product
which would fit with the cargo having bugs (i.e. a strong sulphur smell and
change in colour).

if the testing is now done, i do not know if these bugs will be detected or
not. however, if they are in the ship's samples, they may have changed the
sample sufficiently that even a visual observation may detect the problem.
the next problem becomes proving from where the bugs originated. were they in
the previous cargo tanks that were not cleaned properly? or were they in the
condensate when the cargo was loaded? obviously, testing of the shore sample
prior to loading will determine the answer. if the shore sample is ok, then
they had to come from the ship. if the shore sample also has bugs, then we
should be claiming against our suppliers.

this of course assumes the suggestion put forth by sgs is in fact correct.
just something else to be considered.

2) i am not saying that we pay the full amount immediately but only the
freight portion (about $500,000). we then advise mitsubishi (or their
lawyers) that we will now review the demurrage claim (about $260,000) and
revert by say end nov. the demurrage claim has been sent to our london
office's demurrage department and i have asked them for their comments on the
claim. after all, there may be issues with the ship's pumping performance or
simple laytime errors which may reduce the demurrage claim. they will try to
get me a response before the weekend.

in this manner, we pay part of the money but still have a smaller portion
which we may apply against our claim once the test results are known. i will
leave this to legal as to decide how the approach to mitsubishi or their
lawyers should be made

rgds


Terry, if you get this message in Steve's staff meeting, please tell him
	Rick has the list of Capacity release and Agency agreements with ENA
	that make up the $553,000 Nov. invoice.  Thanks. Lynn


CALPINE SAYS 500-MW TEXAS NATGAS POWER PLANT ON LINE
  Calpine Corp. , the nation's largest independent power company,
  said Wednesday its 500-megawatt (MW) natural gas-fired Hidalgo
  Energy Center in Texas began commercial operation on June 14. -
  (Reuters, LENGTH=296 words)


Christopher:
We have done a trade with a Bermuda hedge fund and have negotiated collateral
provisions that may require them to post csah to us.  The agreement will be
governed by either Texas or New York law.  We need your advice on how to
perfect our interest in any cash posted to us that we would hold in an
account in the United States.  Could you please call either me or Sara
Shackelton (713)853-5620 if possible tomorrow or you can send me an e-mail if
that is easier.  I'm hoping that our possession of the cash is enough.  Sorry
for the short fuse on this.  If you need any additional information, please
contact me or Sara.  I will be unavailable from 9-11 and 2-3 tomorrow Houston
time.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


Sorry but Lynn already gave it away

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Garcia, Ava
Sent:	Tuesday, October 09, 2001 9:47 AM
To:	Corman, Shelley
Subject:	Josue Astros Ticket
Importance:	High

Shelley, Josue was able to get an okay from Rick and was wanting the ticket back he originally won the ticket if you haven't already given it away please let me know.


Thanks man, however, I think we are missing leg 9, B, C on the JP swaps.  Could you re-run and send back?

I would really appreciate it.

Eric

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	McLaughlin Jr., Errol
Sent:	Friday, December 21, 2001 9:18 AM
To:	Boyt, Eric
Subject:	EV7251 Minibook

 << File: EBOYTForwards.xls >>


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/04/2001 03:39
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Ben F Jacoby @ ECT                           01/04/2001 03:38 PM

Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: michael.o.sandridge@us.abb.com @ ENRON
cc: ben.jacoby@enron.com@ENRON, Kay.mann@enron.com@ENRON,
david.onuscheck@us.abb.com@ENRON, karla.hesketh@us.abb.com@ENRON, Fred
Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Contract comments

Mike:

Based on our telephone conversation, the only comment we will include in the
contract is 1 below, i.e. we are not going to change any commercial terms of
the deal. Thanks for your help and patience in this process.

Ben

michael.o.sandridge@us.abb.com on 01/04/2001 01:42:58 PM
To: ben.jacoby@enron.com, Kay.mann@enron.com
cc: david.onuscheck@us.abb.com, karla.hesketh@us.abb.com
Subject: Contract comments

Ben/Kay,
After reviewing the contract with Dave we found only a couple of points that
we
would like to mention;
1) 1.48 the Maximum Liability Amount should be $768,000 USD
2) The unit will not be delivered until the last 10% (ten percent) retention
is
paid and we will post the surety bond as shown in in Exhibit D
3) ABB would not buy back the unit except from Enron.

Please let me know if there is any way that we may further assist you.

MIKE


Marcelo:

Pursuant to our previous discussions, I am attaching a copy of the Legal
Contact list for use by Enron Metals employees in the US, Canada, and South
America. Also, as we discussed, since Houston is not yet linked to the
MG/Enron Metals e-mail address book, please circulate via e-mail for me the
Legal Contact list to each of the Enron Metals employees in NY, Chicago, St.
Louis, Montreal, and South America (Lima and Santiago).  Thanks.

If anyone has any questions, they are free to call me at 713-853-3214.

Regards, Alan


Is that his name???

Dawn


An invitation is on its way to you to join us at a Cocktail Reception on

Saturday 27th January 2001 from 6-8pm, at Morosani Posthotel, Davos,
Switzerland, during the World Economic Forum.

Please reserve this time - we plan this to be a very special and
enjoyable event.

Regards,

David Walker
Morgan Stanley International Inc.


Post Date: April 20, 2001
Category: SHORT-TERM FIRM CAPACITY
Subcategory: NWP OFFERS
Subject: 01-236 Soliciting Electronic Bids

Notice Text:

All Shippers Notification: 01-236??????? Dated April 20, 2001

TO:???? ALL SHIPPERS

FROM:?? Candace C. Karpakis- (801) 584-6996 wk
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? (801) 971-5983
cellular

Williams Gas Pipeline-West
Northwest Pipeline Transportation

SUBJECT:??????? SOLICITING ELECTRONIC BIDS FOR
AVAILABLE FIRM MAINLINE TRANSPORTATION
CAPACITY ON NORTHWEST'S TRANSMISSION
SYSTEM

Northwest has posted the following package of available firm TF-1
Large Customer transportation capacity to its Electronic Bulletin
Board ("EBB") for competitive bid pursuant to the "Right-of-First-
Refusal; Posting of Pipeline Capacity" provision of Northwest's
Tariff, which requires availability of capacity to be posted to the
EBB subject to bid.? All prearranged terms are indicated below, if
applicable.? The prearranged shipper has the right to match the
highest economic value at the end of the bid period.? If the
prearranged shipper does not match the highest economic value, award
of such capacity will be made according to Northwest's tariff.

NOTE:? BIDS FOR POSTED CAPACITY WILL BE CONDUCTED ELECTRONICALLY AS
CLOSED BIDS ON NORTHWEST PIPELINE'S EBB.? Please contact Candace
Karpakis or your Marketing Services Representative if you encounter
any problems with your EBB bid(s).? DON'T WAIT UNTIL THE LAST MINUTE
TO POST YOUR BID.? Time deadlines are electronically monitored and
implemented.

PACKAGE "V"
From the
April 19, 2001 Posting
EBB OFFER # 506

RECEIPT????????????? DELIVERY????????? TOTAL?????? INITIAL PRIMARY?????
PREARRANGED
POINT??????????????????? POINT?????????????? DTH/D??????? CONTRACT
TERM?????????? OFFER

Greasewood?? Clay Basin??????????? 2,765?????????
05/01/01-05/31/01????????????? YES
?????????
Min. Acceptable Bid:??? $0.043 per Dth of daily Reservation Contract Demand
for
?????????????????????????????????????????????? Flexible Receipt/Delivery
Point Rights
Min. Acceptable Bid Vol:??????? 1 Dth/d
Max. Acceptable Bid Vol:??????? 2,765 Dth/d
Bid Open Date:? 04/20/01 - (4:30 pm Central Time)
Bid Close Date: 04/23/01 - (4:30 pm Central Time)
Award Deadline: 04/23/01 - (5:30 pm Central Time)
Evergreen:????? ??????? Month to Month, Ten (10) Business Days Prior Written
?????????????????????????????????????????????? Notice by Either Party
Special Terms & Cond:?? See 1, 2 and 3 Below.

PACKAGE "BB"
From the
April 19, 2001 Posting
EBB OFFER # 507

RECEIPT????????????? DELIVERY????????? TOTAL?????? INITIAL PRIMARY?????
PREARRANGED
POINT???????????????????? POINT????????????? DTH/D??????? CONTRACT
TERM??????????? OFFER

West?????????????????? Clay Basin?????????? 2,354?????????
05/01/01-05/31/01?????????????? YES
Douglas
?????????
Min. Acceptable Bid:??? $0.03 per Dth of daily Reservation Contract Demand
for
?????????????????????????????????????????????? Flexible Receipt/Delivery
Point Rights
Min. Acceptable Bid Vol:??????? 1 Dth/d
Max. Acceptable Bid Vol:??????? 2,354 Dth/d
Bid Open Date:? 04/23/01 - (4:30 pm Central Time)
Bid Close Date: 04/24/01 - (4:30 pm Central Time)
Award Deadline: 04/24/01 - (5:30 pm Central Time)
Evergreen:????? ??????? NONE
Special Terms & Cond:?? See 1, 2 and 3 Below.

PACKAGE "GG-2 & GG-3"
From the
April 19, 2001 Posting
EBB OFFER # 508

RECEIPT????????????? DELIVERY????????? TOTAL?????? INITIAL PRIMARY?????
PREARRANGED
POINT????????????????????? POINT???????????? DTH/D??????? CONTRACT
TERM??????? OFFER

Ignacio????????????? Green River-?????? 5,000?????????
05/01/01-05/31/01?????????? YES
Plant??????????????????? CIG
?????????
Min. Acceptable Bid:????????? $0.03 per Dth of daily Reservation Contract
Demand for
?????????????????????????????????????????????? Flexible Receipt/Delivery
Point Rights
Min. Acceptable Bid Vol:??????? 1 Dth/d
Max. Acceptable Bid Vol:??????? 5,000 Dth/d
Bid Open Date:? 04/23/01 - (4:30 pm Central Time)
Bid Close Date: 04/24/01 - (4:30 pm Central Time)
Award Deadline: 04/24/01 - (5:30 pm Central Time)
Evergreen:????? ??????? NONE
Special Terms & Cond:?? See 1, 2 and 3 Below.

PACKAGE "JJ-1"
From the
April 19, 2001 Posting
EBB OFFER # 509

RECEIPT????????????? DELIVERY????????? TOTAL?????? INITIAL PRIMARY?????
PREARRANGED
POINT???????????????????? POINT????????????? DTH/D???????? CONTRACT
TERM?????????? OFFER

Blanco????????????? Green River-??????? 2,676??????????
05/01/01-05/31/01???????????? YES
Hub-TW???????????????????? CIG
?????????
Min. Acceptable Bid:??? $0.03 per Dth of daily Reservation Contract Demand
for
?????????????????????????????????????????????? Flexible Receipt/Delivery
Point Rights
Min. Acceptable Bid Vol:??????? 1 Dth/d
Max. Acceptable Bid Vol:??????? 2,676 Dth/d
Bid Open Date:? 04/23/01 - (4:30 pm Central Time)
Bid Close Date: 04/24/01 - (4:30 pm Central Time)
Award Deadline: 04/24/01 - (5:30 pm Central Time)
Evergreen:????? ??????? NONE
Special Terms & Cond:?? See 1, 2 and 3 Below.

SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS

1. The discount rate shall apply to points utilized by the original shipper
??????? entering into the transportation agreement with Northwest.

2. A shipper will be allowed to release and/or segment and release the
capacity
and shipper and replacement shipper may utilize any available points on
Northwest's transmission system without impacting the discount for the
original shipper.

3. This prearranged offer is for a reservation contract demand rate.? In
addition
to the Reservation Charge Bid, shipper will pay the volumetric charge, the
applicable surcharges and fuel.

PROCEDURE FOR BIDDING FOR
AVAILABLE TRANSPORTATION CAPACITY

The following guidelines will be adhered to for all posted packages of
transportation
capacity for electronic bid ("package or packages"):

1. Shipper must submit a separate electronic bid for each package of
available
transportation capacity.? Multiple electronic bid(s) can be submitted for the
total available transportation capacity under the specified package OR
multiple
rates can be submitted each for a partial amount of available transportation
capacity under the specified package.? If the same Shipper submits multiple
bids,
the highest present value for such package of available transportation
capacity
shall be considered the valid bid. All other bids from the same Shipper for
the
same package of transportation capacity will be discarded.

2. Northwest awards bids based on a net present value calculation.? If bid
rate is
??????? less than minimum tariff rate, the following formula is utilized:?
Bid Rate x
??????? FERC Interest Rate x The Maximum Bid Quantity x 365 days/100/12; or
if the
??????? maximum rate is bid, the following formula is utilized:? Bid Rate x
FERC Interest
??????? Rate x Maximum Bid Quantity x days bid/100. In case of a tie, each
tied shipper
??????? will have the right to improve its bid by submitting an improved bid
within 24
??????? hours of the bid close time.? Such improved bid shall be faxed to
(801) 584-7076
??????? to Candace Karpakis or Patrick Aman.? If a tie still exists, such
capacity shall
??????? be awarded on a prorata basis.

3. Northwest will not accept bids with a primary contract term (Term) longer
than
??????? indicated for the capacity unless maximum rate is bid.

INSTRUCTIONS FOR CREATING A BID FOR
NORTHWEST'S FIRM CAPACITY RELEASE
OFFERS

1. Select "CAPACITY RELEASE" application in Northwest Passage.
2. Select "CREATE/SUB BID FOR NWP CAP" application.? All current offers will
appear.
3. Highlight the offer you are interested in by clicking the left mouse
button
on the offer.
4. Select the "TERMS & COND" button at the top of the screen, which is now
active.? The screen will allow you to review the conditions of the offer.
Close this screen when you have finished reviewing.
5. At this point you can review current bids posted for this offer by
selecting
the "VIEW BID" button.? Close this screen when you have finished viewing.
6. If you would like to create a bid for this offer, select "CREATE BID"
button.
7. If you want to bid the maximum rate for the capacity, select the "BID MAX
RATE" button.
8. Highlight the "END DATE" if you want to modify the end date of the term of
your offer.
9. If you want to modify the receipt/delivery point maximum and minimum
volume,
highlight the receipt/delivery point section with the left mouse button and
modify accordingly. Select "SAVE".? If an error appears at the button of the
screen, the error will need to be corrected and the data will need to be
saved again.? If successful, a message will appear indicating the bid
information has saved and the bid rate must be entered.? Select "OK".
10. Select the "RATE" button.? Enter the bid rate.? Select "SAVE".

You have just "CREATED" your bid for the offer.? You now need to
"SUBMIT" your bid as follows:

11. Close out of all screens and return to the "CAPACITY RELEASE" menu
screens.

12. To Submit or Review your bid(s), select the "REV/SUB/WDRW NWP CAP BID"
button.
All of your bids will appear.? Highlight the "BID IN DRAFT STATUS" that you
would like to submit.? Select the "SUBMIT" button at the top of the screen
to post the bid.

To Withdraw your bid(s), select the "REV/SUB/WDRW NWP CAP" button.
All of your bids will appear.? If the bid has not yet been submitted,
highlight the "BID IN DRAFT STATUS" that you would like to withdraw.
Select the "WITHDRAW" button at the top of the screen to withdraw the
bid.? After a bid has been withdrawn, you can select the "DELETE"
button at the top of the screen to delete it from the screen.
NOTE:? After each selection, always "REFRESH" the screen to get the latest
status.

Word: F\Short Term/Capacity for Bid-All 2001 April 20, 2001 01-236 Res.doc


Please make a note of this and follow up before we make any 4Q payments.

Patty

---------------------- Forwarded by Patricia A Lee/HOU/EES on 08/17/2001 06:53 AM ---------------------------
From:	Lori Pinder/ENRON@enronXgate on 08/16/2001 07:03 PM
To:	Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Barbara Hankins/HOU/EES@EES, Beth Apke/HOU/EES@EES, Judy Knepshield/ENRON@enronXgate, James L Bouillion/ENRON@enronXgate, James Derrick/ENRON@enronXgate, Charles Cheek/ENRON@enronXgate, Becky Stephens/ENRON@enronXgate, Janice Priddy/ENRON@enronXgate, Cynthia Barrow/ENRON@enronXgate, Mary Perkins/ENRON@enronXgate, Sandra Hrna/ENRON@enronXgate, Kate Cole/ENRON@enronXgate, Teresa Callahan/ENRON@enronXgate, Larry Pardue/ENRON@enronXgate, Sylvia Hu/ENRON@enronXgate, Wanda Labaume/ENRON@enronXgate, Johnson Leo/ENRON@enronXgate, Sharon J Reese/HOU/EES@EES, Greg Whiting/ENRON@enronXgate, Lynda Pham/ENRON@enronXgate, Patricia A Lee/HOU/EES@EES, Jerry Thomas Moore/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:	James E Keller/HOU/EES@EES, Lillian Bailey/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject:	Enron Energy Marketing Corp. - Withdrawal of Qualification in Indiana

Enron Energy Marketing Corp. (87C-ENEM)

We have been requested by EES to file for the withdrawal of the above company's qualification to conduct business in the State of Indiana.  If you are aware of any reason NOT to withdraw from this state, please let me know by Thursday, August 30, 2001.

Should we receive no objection, we will proceed to file for the withdrawal.

Thanks.

Lori Pinder
Supervisor, Corporate Services
and Assistant Secretary
1400 Smith St., Room 4802
Houston, Texas 77002
713.853.7291
713.646.8007 (Fax)


EnSerCo plans to file an arbitration demand against Industrial Holdings,
Inc. to obtain re-payment of a $15 million promissory note.

 EnSerCo also plans to make demand against the guarantors of the IHI debt:The
Rex Group, Rex Machinery Sales, Inc., Rex Machinery Movers, Inc., U.S.
Crating, Inc., First Texas Credit Corporation, Landreth Engineering Company,
Pipeline Valve Specialty, Inc., Bolt Manufacturing Co.Inc., LSS-Lone Star
Houston, Inc., American Rivet Company, Inc., Manifold Valve Services, Inc.,
Philform, Inc., GHX Incorporated, Regal Machine Tool, Inc., Whir Acquisition,
Inc., Moores Pump and Supply, Inc., GHX Incorporated of Louisiana and Beird
Industries, Inc.

 If you are aware of any reason why an arbitration demand should not be filed
against any of these entities, please call me or e-mail me by the end of
business on Monday March 5, 2001.  If I don't hear from you by then, I will
assume that you have no objection to moving forward against these companies.

 Thanks in advance.

       GAIL


Karen,

I have attached the Request Form.  If you need a hard copy with signatures
please let me know.

Thank you,
Robin

Karen Davis@ENRON
01/02/2001 11:24 AM
To: rrodri2@ect.enron.com
cc:
Subject: GMAT

Robin:

It is my understanding that you have enrolled in the Tues GMAT Class.  Please
review the below note.  I need you to fill out the Educational Assistance
Request Form before taking the class.  Please email the form back to me.
After receiving the form I will send you a confirmation letter with all the
details on getting reimbursed.

Thanks, any questions call me 5-8327.
---------------------- Forwarded by Karen Davis/NA/Enron on 01/02/2001 11:20
AM ---------------------------

Karen Davis
12/20/2000 03:32 PM
To: Aaron Martinsen/HOU/EES@EES, Ace Roman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adam Siegel/NA/Enron,
Adnan Patel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Adrian Woolcock/HOU/EES@EES, Alan
Nahman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alejandro Hernandez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Alicia Perkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Allan Wu/HOU/ECT, Alton Jackson/Corp/Enron,
Amanda Schultz/NA/Enron, Ami Thakkar/NA/Enron@ENRON, Amie Ha/HOU/EES@EES, Amy
Jon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amy Lehnert/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Ana
Maria Hernandez/NA/Enron, Andy Chen/PDX/ECT, Angie Zeman/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Anila Hoxha/NA/Enron@Enron, Anthony Sexton/NA/Enron@Enron, Ashish
Mahajan/HOU/EES@EES, Ashley Dietz/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Ashley Worthing/NA/Enron@Enron, Atticus Lyon/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Avinash
Jain/NA/Enron, Ben Huxen/NA/Enron@ENRON, Benjamin Freeman/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Benjamin Markey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Benjamin Thomason/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beth
Cowan/NA/Enron@Enron, Bilal Bajwa/NA/Enron@Enron, Binh Pham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad
Mauritzen/HOU/EES@EES, Brandon Cavazos/NA/Enron@Enron, Brandon Luna/Enron
Communications, Brent Dornier/Enron Communications, Brian Cohen/NA/Enron,
Brian Haufrect/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Brian Hoskins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian
Kolle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Steinbrueck/AA/Corp/Enron@Enron, Bryan
Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bucky Dusek/HOU/EES, Carlos Vicens/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Carrie Southard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Catherine
Pernot/NA/Enron, Chad Landry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chetan Paipanandiker/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Chi Sheh/HOU/EES@EES, Ching Lun/HOU/EES@EES, Chris Jantz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Chris Mallory/PDX/ECT@ECT, Chris Ochoa/NA/Enron@Enron, Chris
Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christa Winfrey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christiaan
Huizer/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Christina
Barthel/Corp/Enron@Enron, Christine Milliner/FGT/Enron@Enron, Christopher
Chenoweth/NA/Enron@Enron, Christopher Watts/NA/Enron, Christy Wussow/HOU/EES,
Chuck Ames/NA/Enron@Enron, Cindi To/HOU/EES@EES, Clifford Nash/HOU/EES,
Colleen Koenig/NA/Enron@Enron, Courtney Childers/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Courtney Votaw/NA/Enron, Crystal Hyde/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan
Feather/SA/Enron@Enron, Daniel Arzola/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Daniel Falcone/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Daniel Kang/HOU/EES@EES,
Darren Ramsey/NA/Enron@Enron, David Dupre/Corp/Enron, David
Fontana/HOU/EES@EES, David Hunker/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Junus/HOU/EES@EES,
David Marye/OTS/Enron@Enron, Dayem Khandker/NA/Enron, Dejoun
Windless/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Denver Plachy/NA/Enron@Enron, Derek
Mo/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Duc Duong/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Elberg Gelin/HOU/EES,
Elizabeth Johnston/NA/Enron, Elizabeth Shim/Corp/Enron@Enron, Emily
Allwardt/LON/ECT, Eric Mason/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Eric
Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Erika Breen/HOU/EES@EES, Erin A Rice/LON/ECT, Erin
Willis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ethan Schultz/Enron Communications, Ethel
Koskas/NA/Enron@Enron, Farouk Lalji/HOU/ECT@ECT, Felipe
Ospina/NA/Enron@ENRON, Gabriel Chavez/NA/Enron@Enron, Gabriel
Monroy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gallin Fortunov/HOU/EES@EES, Garrett Ashmore/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Gary Justice/NA/Enron, Geir
Solberg/PDX/ECT@ECT, George Thomas/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gerardo
Benitez/Corp/Enron, Gisselle Rohmer/HOU/EES, Gloria
Rodriguez/Corp/Enron@Enron, Grace Kim/HOU/EES@EES, Greg Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Hang Bui/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hans Oliver Pereira/HOU/EES@EES, Harry
Bucalo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Heather A Johnson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Heather Alon/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Hector Alviar/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Hector Campos/HOU/ECT, Henry Juniora S.
Montana/HOU/EES@EES, Homer Lin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ibrahim
Qureishi/Corp/Enron@Enron, Irina Nekrasova/HOU/EES, Israel
Estrada/Corp/Enron@ENRON, J Christopher Champion/LON/ECT@ECT, James
Marks/HOU/EES@EES, James Whitehead/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James
Wininger/NA/Enron@Enron, Jason R Wiesepape/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jason Thompkins/Enron
Communications, Jayce Roundtree/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeanie
Miller/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jean-Sebastien Fontaine/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey
Oh/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey Snyder/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jennifer
McQuade/NA/Enron@Enron, Jennifer Reside/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer S
Keith/HOU/EES@EES, Jennifer N Stewart/NA/Enron, Jerald Surface/HOU/EES@EES,
Jeremy Lo/HOU/EES@EES, Jim Gardner/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Jin Guo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jodi Thrasher/HOU/EES@EES, Jody Crook/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Joey Esperance/LON/ECT@ECT, John Hudson/HOU/EES@EES, John Lang/HOU/EES@EES,
John Weakly/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jonathan Anderson/HOU/EES@EES, Jonathan
Hoff/HOU/ECT@ect, Jonathan Roumel/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Jonathon Pielop/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph Piotrowski/NA/Enron@Enron, Juan
Padron/NA/Enron, Julie Davidson/HOU/EES@EES, Julie Ferrara/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Justin Day/HOU/EES, Justin O'Malley/HOU/EES@EES, Justin Rostant/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Justyn Thompson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Karen Herrmann/NA/Enron, Karla
Compean/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katie Stowers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kendell Sprott/HOU/EES,
Kenneth Chow/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Kent McNellie/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin
Ashby/NA/Enron, Khristina Griffin/NA/Enron@Enron, Kim Womack/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Kimberly Ketchum/NA/Enron, Kourtney
Nelson/PDX/ECT@ECT, Kreg Hall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristen Quinn/NA/Enron@Enron,
Larry F Campbell/NA/Enron, Lauren Schlesinger/HOU/EES@EES, Leah
Stephens/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lena Zhu/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Leon Branom/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lin Yin/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Lindsay Renaud/HOU/EES@EES, Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT, Luis Mena/NA/Enron,
Luis Velez/NA/Enron, Marcus Edmonds/HOU/EES@EES, Marcus Edmonds/HOU/EES@EES,
Maria Tefel/NA/Enron@Enron, Marissa Womble/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Mark Mixon/NA/Enron@Enron, Marsha Francis/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Martin Sonesson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mason
Hamlin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mateo Vegalara/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Matthew Almy/NA/Enron@ENRON, Matthew Jachimiak/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew
Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mauricio Trejo/NA/Enron@Enron, Melanie
Gaar/NA/Enron@ENRON, Melanie King/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Micah Hatten/HOU/EES@EES, Michael Benien/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Michael
Kolman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael M Driscoll/PDX/ECT@ECT, Michael Olsen/NA/Enron,
Michael Simmons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Spruiell/HOU/EES@EES, Michelle
Gross/HOU/EES@EES, Michelle Thompson/NA/Enron@Enron, Michelle
Waldhauser/Corp/Enron@Enron, Michelle Zhang/HOU/ECT@ECT, Millie
Gautam/HOU/EES@EES, Misti Day/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mog Heu/NA/Enron@Enron, Molly
Hellerman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Monika Causholli/PDX/ECT@ECT, Nate
Blackburn/NA/Enron, Nathan Lang/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Neithard Foley/HOU/EES@EES, Niclas Egmar/HOU/EES@EES, Nicole
Alvino/HOU/ECT@ECT, Otis Wathington/HOU/EES@EES, Paul Gregory/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Tan/NA/Enron@Enron, Peter Bennett/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Peter
Ward/HOU/EES@EES, Petual Jeanmard/Corp/Enron, Phillip Berry/HOU/EES@EES,
Posey Martinez/HOU/ECT, Priya Jaisinghani/Enron Communications, Purvi
Patel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rachana Iyengar/HOU/EES, Rafael Avila/HOU/EES@EES, Ragan
Dolezal/NA/Enron@Enron, Rahmaan Mwongozi/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rahul
Seksaria/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rajan Oommen/NA/Enron@ENRON, Raul Yzquierdo/Enron
Communications, Ravi Mujumdar/NA/Enron@Enron, Reagan Mathews/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Rebecca Walker/NA/Enron@Enron, Reginald
Smith/HOU/EES, Reza Rezaeian/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ricardo Perez/NA/Enron, Rob
Black/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Roberto
Martinez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roger
Persson/HOU/EES@EES, Roman Zadorozhny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russell
Ballato/NA/Enron@Enron, Russell T Kelley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ryan Deane/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Ryan Hinze/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ryan Synnott/HOU/ECT, Ryan
Taylor/NA/Enron@Enron, Sabina Rank/NA/Enron@Enron, Sachin
Gandhi/NA/Enron@Enron, Samantha Bryce/NA/Enron, Samar Khleif/Enron, Samuel
Pak/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sanjay Patel/NA/Enron@Enron, Sara Weaver/HOU/EES@EES,
Sarah Mulholland/HOU/ECT, Sarah Shimeall/HOU/EES@EES, Sarah Taylor/NA/Enron,
Savithri Hospeti/NA/Enron@Enron, Sebastien Bouvier/HOU/EES@EES, Selena
Gonzalez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shahid Shah/NA/Enron, Shalesh Ganjoo/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Shanna Husser/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sharon Hausinger/HOU/EES@EES, Sheetal
Patel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shelia Benke/Corp/Enron, Shilpa Chunchu/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Shilpa Mane/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Shiraz
Rehman/NA/Enron@Enron, Shirley Gail Sidler/Corp/Enron, Simone La
Rose/HOU/ECT, Song Gao/HOU/EES, Sonia Balboa/NA/Enron, Stacy
Dunegan/Corp/Enron, Stephanie Segura/HOU/ECT, Steve Hirsh/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Suresh Vasan/Enron Communications, Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan
Rance/NA/Enron@Enron, Tara Piazze/NA/Enron@ENRON, Ted Huang/Enron
Communications, Terrance Pinckney/NA/Enron, Timothy Blanchard/HOU/EES,
Timothy Coffing/HOU/EES@EES, Tobin Carlson/HOU/ECT, Todd Richards/Corp/Enron,
Todd Van Roten/HOU/ECT, Tom Baldwin/HOU/EES, Travis Andrews/HOU/EES, Travis
Hansen/HOU/EES, Travis Winfrey/HOU/ECT, Tricia Escueta/HOU/EES, Tyrell
Harrison/NA/Enron, Usman Shaukat/NA/Enron, Veronica Hill/NA/Enron, Victor
Guggenheim/HOU/ECT, Will Chen/Enron Communications, William St.
John/HOU/EES@EES, Yan Jin/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Yevgeny
Frolov/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Yvette Parker/Corp/Enron,
Zac McCarroll/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Zaib Iqtidar/Corp/Enron, Zal Masani/Enron
Communications, Zeina El-Azzi/Corp/Enron
cc: Bradley Stewart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jana Giovannini/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shelly
Butler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie Braly/NA/Enron@ENRON, Andrea
Richards/NA/Enron@Enron, Lisa Jones/NA/Enron@ENRON

Subject: GMAT

Enron and The Princeton Review have teamed to offer a review course at the
Enron Bldg. for the Graduate Management Admission Test (GMAT).
The GMAT figures prominently in applicatons to business school.

The Princeton Review invests over three million dollars per year in research
and development.  They routinely send their GMAT teachers to take the actual
test to ensure that students who take the review course are fully prepared.

There will be an initial session on Thursday January 4, 2001 from 6-9:30 pm
in EB560.  This initial session will include a diagnostice exam.

Two different classes consisting of seven Tuesdays or seven Thursdays have
been set up.  The classes will begin on Jan 9 or Jan 11 and run through Feb
20 or Feb 22.

 7 weekly meetings held at Enron, Room EB11C2.
 6-9 PM for 3 hours
 Classes begin Thursday, June 22 through August  10
 Class size limited to 8 students
 25 hours of class time
 Analysts in the Program need to fill out the tuition reimbursement form
below and send to Karen Davis EB1193 (x58327) for prior approval
 Enron will pay for one GMAT study program

Register directly with the Princeton Review

 Call 713-688-5500 - Natala Matusz
 Pay tuition  with your own credit card
 Receive a complete set of Princeton Review course materials
 Practice with 4 diagnostic exams during the 8 week class

Reimbursements

 Obtain a certificate and receipt from The Princeton Review
 Complete the Educational Assistance form
 Analysts should take their forms to Karen Davis  (x 58327), EB1193 for
processing

Here are a few valuable documents for Educational Assistance
Please remember before signing up for CFA, GMAT or CPA courses or exams you
will need to get prior written approval from Karen Davis Ext. 5-8327 Location
EB1193.
This is the instruction manual for filling out the request
-----------------------
This is the request document
----------------------------------------------------------
For more information on benefits that Enron has to offer go to
http://hrweb.enron.com  and check out Policies & Guides

For more information on benefits that Enron has to offer go to
http://hrweb.enron.com  and check out Policies & Guides


To:	Associate/Analyst Program Worldwide

From:	Ken Lay	Department:	Office of the Chairman

Subject:	Associate/Analyst Program	Date:	August 22, 2001

As most of you know, Jeff Skilling created the Associate/Analyst Program in 1990.  This Program is one of his most successful and important contributions to Enron, and will continue as a cornerstone of the Company.  It remains our single most important source of new talent.

The purpose of this memo is to reassure you that the direction, philosophy, and importance of the Program remains unchanged.  As we have said many times, most of our new businesses were created by graduates and members of the Program.  Many of the current leaders of our company are also graduates of the Program.

Three broad principles will continue to guide the direction of the Program.
?	We will have only one Associate/Analyst Program at Enron, and it is a Company asset.
?	We will have a "One Enron" presence on campus to provide clarity of message and purpose.
?	The Program is rotational in nature, and will prepare our future leaders for success by providing exposure to Enron's network of people and systems.

The business prospects for Enron, and the opportunities for personal growth and development have never been better.  We also enjoy the deepest and broadest talent pool we have ever had.  Each and every one of you can be a key contributor to making Enron the World's Leading Company.

cc:
Billy Lemmons - Associate/Analyst Program
John Sherriff - Associate/Analyst Committee Chair
Management Committee
Associate/Analyst Committee
Associate/Analyst Department
Human Resources Leads
Program PRC Reps
Program Supervisors

<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>


Vance,

The following nominations do not have deal tickets in Sitara for September,
2000 activity.  Please advise whether the deals will be spot or firm.  Daren
wants everything in Sitara by 3pm on Monday, August 28.  Thanks.

Bob

Source   Meter #  Sept Nom

CCGM, LP  9840  1,000
Cross-Tex  5467  250
Cummins & Walker UNK  500
Dallas Production 6789  12,519
Duke Energy Trading 6347  206
EEX Operating  5999  11,632
EOG Resources 4157  76
HESCO Gathering 9624  100
HESCO Gathering 9835  700
PH Exploration  6838  94
Pioneer Exploration 2698  1,000
Pure Resources 9830  500
Rio Vista  6442  609
Samson Lonestar 9845  2,886
Swift Energy  2630  322
TEMA Oil & Gas 4688  1
Tri-Union Develop. 2697  700
Whiting Petroleum 6523  100


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  ? 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Crude     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/crude32.pdf
Natural Gas     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/ngas32.pdf
Distillate     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hoil32.pdf
Unleaded     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/unlded32.pdf

Nov WTI/Brent Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/clxqox.pdf
Heat Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/heatcrack.pdf
Gas Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/gascrack.pdf
Jan/Feb Heat     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hofhog.pdf
Gas/Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/huxhox.pdf
Nov/Mar Unlead     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/huxhuh.pdf

Nat Gas Strip Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/StripmatrixNG32.pdf
Nat Gas Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixNG32.pdf

Crude and Products Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixCL32.pdf

Scott Oblander
312-762-1015
312-762-1014 fax
Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker
Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606


Kim:  I need to verify that the EOL amendment changes conform to the general financial power template changes.

(1)  The EOL amendment provides that the rounding convention for calculating power Floating Prices relating to MMBtus is rounding to four places; the current financial power template provides for rounding to three decimal places.  Which is the correct convention?

(2)  With respect to corrections to published prices, changes will be required to both the ISDA and GTC formats since the latest EOL amendment does not conform to standard ISDA terminology.  There is no corresponding GTC terminology.

Please let me know about (1) above.  Thanks.  Sara

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hundl, Kimberly
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 5:23 PM
To:	Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	RE: New Confirm Template

Yes, all templates should include language covering corrections to published prices.  On October 9th, I forwarded an email to you requesting your review of that language that we received from Brent Hendry.  I had not heard back yet, but was planning to add that to our templates after I got your approval.  If you would like that email re-sent, please let me know.
The only rounding language that I am aware of, is in the second to last paragraph of this template.
Please let me know what changes are necessary.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shackleton, Sara
Sent:	Monday, October  22, 2001 4:59 PM
To:	Hundl, Kimberly
Subject:	RE: New Confirm Template

Kim:

A very general question:  shouldn't all of the financial power templates provide for corrections to published prices and rounding to four places for commodities quoted in MMBtus?  Your template does not contain either of these.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hundl, Kimberly
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 1:51 PM
To:	Shackleton, Sara; Hendry, Brent
Cc:	Murphy, Melissa Ann
Subject:	New Confirm Template

Per our discussion this morning I have attached the new form for our confirms.  Please let me know if further changes are necessary.
 << File: sampledoc.doc >>
Thank you for your help!
Kimberly Hundl x31647


what are you talking about?  leave where?  to pakistan?  i said that you could come with me.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 1:06 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:

nice to just leave


You have received this email because you are listed as a data approver. Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000082434&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000082434
Request Create Date : 2/6/02 2:17:51 PM
Requested For       : justin.fernandez@enron.com
Resource Name       : Sitara Houston Production Central Edit Logistics
Resource Type       : Applications


Greetings:
I tried to log in and the system told me that I'm not authorized to use the
system.
Best,
Jeff


(See attached file: hpl1006.xls)

 - hpl1006.xls


FYI.

---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Healy/HOU/ECT on 11/21/2000 08:34
AM ---------------------------

Stephen Plauche@ENRON
11/21/2000 08:34 AM
To: Scott Healy/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Stack replacement Test

FYI.... language on stack replacement testing.

Stephen
---------------------- Forwarded by Stephen Plauche/Corp/Enron on 11/21/2000
08:36 AM ---------------------------

Anthony Butler @ ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 11/20/2000 05:22:15 PM
To: Terri Austin/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Stephen Plauche@ENRON, Scott Healy@ECT, Terri
Austin/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michael D
Nanny/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Re: Stack replacement Test

Terri, Gentlemen:

The following is the paragraph I propose we use for the "Mature Testing"
requirements (in blue).  It would fall under exhibit D, together with the
other two categories of performance testing already discussed and agreed to
with FCE (Acceptance Performance Testing and Warrantee Compliance Performance
Testing).  As a third category of performance testing, the replacement stack
testing will be subject to all of the requirements that have been set forth
for the other performance testing...mainly the need for an agreed to
procedure.

Please let me know if you have nay comments, or if we need to have more or
less details in the paragraph.

Replacement Stack Testing:

Replacement Stack Performance Testing will be done following the replacement
of one or both stacks on each unit.  The replacement stack performance
testing shall be performed to asses the new stack performance level and to
determine its contribution to the overall plant.  Replacement stack testing
must include provisions to accurately determine stack performance and its
contribution to the overall plant performance.  It includes detail evaluation
of the DC to AC conversion performance in order to be able to express the new
stack performance level in terms of plant net output and efficiency.

Regards,

Tony Butler

Terri Austin
11/17/2000 04:27 PM
To: Anthony Butler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Stephen Plauche@ENRON, Scott Healy@ECT, Terri
Austin/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michael D
Nanny/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Stack replacement Test

Tony,

Please forward your shot at the Stack replacement test to the people that are
on the CC list above.

Thank  you.
Terri Austin


Thanks!!!!!!!!  Have a Good Weekend!!!

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Kay, here's the near to last draft of the  form. Sorry of the delay and
thanks for being a sport about it, especially when your dvelope rtypes are
needig to get on down the road.. Please feel free to work on this, but
please  don't distribute this as our form, as you can see from the note
below that we still have a way to go before it is  the "form',but remaining
work is limited to speific content here and there, typos ,and some
litigation sturff. The structure will remain, so you can safely work into
this the West LB stuff.

John R. asked that  you and he have a chat about the directionyou are
headedand hwo to coordinate the changes that need to be made - in terms of
substance as awell as drafting - to get to an standard set of changes for
the off balance sheet work. I would be glad to participate.

---------------------- Forwarded by John Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
on 09/21/2000 06:23 PM ---------------------------

John Schwartzenburg
09/21/2000 01:57 PM

To:   Peter Nassab/Corp/Enron@Enron, Larry Bishop/NA/Enron@Enron, John G
      Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Roberto
      Sevitz/NA/Enron@Enron, David K
      Bargainer/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Scott
      Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Angie
      Chappell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject:  Form Contract, Rev Minus 1

Here's the next to last iteration of the form contract before we christen
it officially "FORM 2000 - Rev. 00",clean and compared. John R will need to
take this, diddle with it,  and use the product PDQ for a couple of crisis
applications, but before it becomed and gets advertized as "Form 2000" I
woanted to collect  last comments from you guys and get some fine tuning
from  our litigation mangers  onthe arbitration and dispute resoluton
materials, which is to be on my desk by the end of the day.
Because of Johnnie's urgencies, I did not have the chance to pretty up
format and section and page numbers, please forgive. We will get it next
time.

You guys also have the un-revised draft exhibits. I think Rigby was to
revise to try and revise them to fit  the form - I await the draft exhibits
withbaited breath.

Please collect your thoughts and we we schedule a time to get tehm in.

Angie, please print both attachemenst and this e-mail for me.

(See attached file: ENRON EPC-0921-rev0-1.doc)

 - ENRON EPC-0921-rev0-1.doc


Due to email problems last week, this message is being re-sent.  If this is a duplicate, please disregard.
eSource now offers free
Broker Research and First Call Notes from Intelligence Data.  Analyst Reports  on Enron, the energy industry, competitors, broadband, and telecom are continually updated and available here.
Obtain password and view reports  at  http://esource.enron.com/hot_topics.asp
and
eSource is pleased to offer a valuable report issued by Forrester Research entitled

"Spending Wisely on Private Hubs ".
Issued July, 2001
Valued at $2,000, the report is available for free viewing and download until September 12, 2001,
by all Enron employees and business units.
 This report details ways to determine private hub strategy based on the six key drivers of hub payoffs.

Download report at  http://esource.enron.com/hot_topics.asp

***
Visit eSource's Hot Topics page often for more reports, services, announcements and news.

<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>


Mark:

I don't  mean to be a bother, but have you had an opportunity to consider
this???

Please let me know when you get a chance.

Bret

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Strong, Bret
> Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 1:29 PM
> To: 'mark.e.haedicke@enron.com'
> Cc: 'janette.elbertson@enron.com'
> Subject: Request for Participation in Power Institute
>
> Mr. Haedicke:
>
> Please let me apologize in advance for not providing this response earlier
> based on discussions with your assistant Ms. Elbertson.  I was trying to
> clarify needs for the Institute with other planning committee members, and
> then was involved in an unfortunate accident which has had be out of the
> office for a major portion of the last 2 weeks.
>
> As previously discussed through your assistant, we would be interested in
> your participation as a panelist in a discussion to take place as part of
> the Power Institute to take place on June 7 and 8, 2001 at South Texas
> College of Law (downtown Houston).  The segment I would like to solicit
> your participation in is entitled "E-Commerce in the New Energy World" at
> 1:00 PM - 1:45 PM which was originally structured as a "speech", but the
> planners would like to restructure as a round-table discussion including
> legal representatives from Pantellos (confirmed), the newly-defunct
> Petrocosm and yourself (Enron On-line).  The panel would be moderated with
> some "canned questions" that we'd give you ahead of time, and some time
> for questions and answers from the audience.  There would be little
> preparation other than sharing your experiences.  I've faxed the brochure
> to 713-646-2600 for your review.
>
> If you are unavailable, we would welcome one of your attorneys from your
> staff.  It's a great opportunity to "sell" Enron On-Line to a captive
> audience of industry participants.
>
> Please let me know at your earliest convenience.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bret
>
> Bret L. Strong
> Winstead Sechrest & Minick
> The Woodlands, TX 77381
> 281-367-2222


Joseph will set up the call and distribute to the list.

	Rebecca W Cantrell@ECT
	12/12/2000 06:56 PM

		 To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Steve Montovano/NA/Enron@Enron@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron@ECT,
Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron@ECT, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron@ECT
		 Subject: Conference Call/Gas Issues Paper

This is all I have received.   I asked for a confirmation, but have not
received one yet.  I got Lysa's phone mail, so I don't know if she is there
or not.

---------------------- Forwarded by Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT on 12/12/2000
06:52 PM ---------------------------

Lysa Akin
12/11/2000 05:43 PM
To: Leslie Lawner/HOU/EES@EES, Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron, Roy Boston/HOU/EES@EES, Steve Montovano/DUB/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Conference Call re: Gas Curtailment and Diversion Paper

Please advise ASAP your availability for a call regarding the above
referenced topic on Wednesday, December 13th at
7:00 am Pacific / 9:00am Central / 10:00am Eastern

Lysa Akin
Enron Corp.
Sr. Admin. Ass't. - Gov't Affairs
121 SW Salmon, 3WTC0306
Portland, OR  97204
Office (503) 464-7927
Fax (503) 464-3740
lysa.akin@enron.com


Friday night at 7pm
281.561.7228
Directions are in email below.

I already made reservations and ordered a peking duck and the fish with
spicy noodles dish.  Other stuff we can order when we arrive.

Peter and CM are confirmed.

David, let me know if you and Jessie want to join.  Hope so.  : )

Amy

>From: "John Huang" <thx_135@hotmail.com>
>To: ayueh@hotmail.com, ron_he@dell.com
>Subject: Re: Restaurant Name
>Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 12:23:46 -0500
>
>It's located on Beachnut, in the shopping center on the right hand side
>after Boone, if you are coming from BeltWay 8
>
>
>>From: "Amy Yueh" <ayueh@hotmail.com>
>>To: thx_135@hotmail.com, ron_he@dell.com
>>Subject: Restaurant Name
>>Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 12:09:24 -0500
>>
>>John/ Ron:
>>
>>Do you guys remember that Peking duck place we went to where you had to
>>call 2 hours in advance where they had that yummy spicy noodle fish dish?
>>
>>What is the name of that place and their telephone number?  and the
>>location?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Amy  : )
>>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


HEADLINE: Davis faces dire political consequences if power woes linger

BYLINE: By Daniel Borenstein

BODY:

??WALNUT CREEK, Calif. _ As Democrats prepare for their first statewide
convention since the electricity crisis erupted, some elected officials and
strategists are warning of dire political consequences if Gov. Gray Davis
fails
to clean up the power mess.

??"All of us should be thinking about the effect the energy crisis is going to
have on our chances of maintaining control of both houses, and the effect the
governor will have on the ticket up and down," said state Sen. Don Perata,
D-Alameda. "If he has not performed well and he has a D after his name, that
could be problematic."

??Garry South, the governor's top political strategist, said Thursday that the
state's electricity woes probably won't be over soon, but the voters
understand
Davis didn't create the problem.

??"It won't be solved in six months," South said. "This is an immediate
problem
that is not susceptible to an immediate solution. This is a several-year
process
to get this situation back under control."

??As for the governor's critics, "I think they should be asked to produce
their
own plan. It's awful easy to take pot shots, but most of those who I read
about
in the newspapers have no plan."

??The intraparty sniping on the eve of the party convention highlights the
frustration Democrats are feeling about the crisis_and its potential political
damage.

??Four months ago, this weekend's convention in Anaheim seemed certain to be a
Davis fete. Although Democrats had lost the presidency, Al Gore easily carried
California and the party was in firm control of the Legislature and the
state's
congressional delegation.

??Davis had led the Gore effort in California and the governor was personally
and politically popular across the state. This would have been the convention
for him to showcase his achievements for education, the issue he had promised
to
make the hallmark of his first term.

??But electricity now overshadows everything else. To be sure, the governor
will tout his policy achievements during a Saturday morning speech to the
convention delegates. And he is not shying away from the spotlight.

??Tonight, he will host a party for the delegates at Disney's California
Adventure Theme Park. That prompted one Democratic consultant from Sacramento
who won't be attending to quip, "We're in fantasy land here, thank you. We
don't
need to go to Disneyland for that."

??Some are shaking their heads in disbelief at how the governor has handled
the
events of the past week. "In many ways, he appears to have gone politically
tone
deaf," said Sherry Bebitch Jeffe, political analyst at Claremont Graduate
University. "His instincts are not serving him well."

??While his top aides were meeting with legislators last week to warn them
that
a $10 billion bond package won't be enough to get the state out of the crisis,
Davis was at a $10,000-per-person Palm Springs golf tournament to raise money
for his re-election campaign.

??When his hand-picked members of the Public Utilities Commission this week
approved an electricity rate hike that experts have been predicting for
months,
Davis claimed that he didn't know about the plan before it was announced and
that he thought it was premature.

??Other Democrats, however, thought the commission action was overdue. "I'm
glad to see the PUC stepping out and doing something along the lines that some
of us have been talking about needing to be done for the last six or eight
weeks," said state Sen. Tom Torlakson, D-Antioch. "There's a high level of
frustration. There haven't been clear answers to what the solution is."

??South, the Davis political strategist, said a lot of factors are outside the
governor's control. "No one can predict with any certainty where this is going
to go, and no one can predict when this situation is going to be brought under
control. We don't control the generators, we don't control the FERC (Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission), we don't control what Wall Street is going to
do."

??As for the potential political fallout, South said the governor and
Democrats
remain in a strong position. After all, he said, the deregulation plan was
pushed through by a Republican governor and Republicans in Washington are
blocking efforts to cap prices.

??Jack Pitney, government professor at Claremont McKenna College, predicted
Davis could weather the electricity crisis. "People who are following it know
it's roots run deeper than the Davis administration and the Republicans don't
have any plausible alternatives," he said.

??"My read of public opinion is people don't think there's a simple and easy
solution and they're not expecting one. They may be impatient but they won't
necessarily take it out on (Davis)."

??It's too early to predict the political outcome, said Mark Baldassare,
pollster at the Public Policy Institute of California.

??"The impacts won't be clear until people have gone through a few billing
cycles and we've gone through the summer blackouts, until we see what the
personal impacts are so we know what the political impacts are," he said.
"That's the really crucial period for Gray Davis' political future, after this
summer."


Please see attached per your request

Mike D.


2002 U.S. REGIONAL TRANSMISSION ORGANIZATION STUDY

Dear Energy Industry Professional:

As the wholesale energy and transmission sectors
continue their dramatic transformation, it's critical for
energy professionals to understand the latest changes
and how they will impact the electric industry.  For the
last decade, ever-changing, complex issues have
characterized the regional transmission organization
(RTO) landscape.  This year's events are no exception.
As FERC persists in its effort to drive RTO formation, its
latest rulings have pushed for a U.S. transmission
industry that is increasingly regional in shape, scope,
and function.

February Customer Discount
http://rs6.net/tn.jsp?t=zu6rqqn6.mnhgwqn6.rghbwqn6&p=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.efinc.com%2Frto_facts.asp
EFI's 2002 U.S. RTO Study is now complete. If you
order before February 22, 2002, you can purchase EFI's
350+ page 2002 U.S. Regional Transmission
Organization Study for the discounted price of $400 for
a hard bound copy or $900 for a site license (includes a
hard bound and electronic copy).  (Shipping is included.)

Praise for the Annual RTO Study
http://rs6.net/tn.jsp?t=zu6rqqn6.mnhgwqn6.sghbwqn6&p=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.efinc.com%2Fsecure%2Forderform_study.asp
This year's RTO study expands upon acclaimed studies
by EFI from the past three years:  "As the variety of
species and subspecies multiplies in the fecund world of
electricity transmission, Boston think tank EFI has
produced a field guide to the critters.  EFI's United
States Regional Transmission Organization Study
provides an extensive breakdown of many of the thorny
technical issues presently bedeviling the industry."  -
Electricity Daily

EFI's RTO study provides comprehensive research on
over 20 U.S. RTO and Transco initiatives.  In addition
to detailing market characteristics, development and
planning, governance, operating structures,
transmission pricing, congestion management, and
power exchanges for each initiative, this year's study
analyzes the regional consolidation efforts now
underway in the Northeast, Midwest, Southeast, and
West.  For more information or to order the RTO study
visit www.efinc.com or me at (781) 273-
5700 ext. 246.  Thank you.

Sincerely,

Ryan Chaytors
EFI/XENERGY
------------------------------------------------
email: rchaytors@xenergy.com
voice: (781) 273-5700 ext. 246
web: http://www.efinc.com
------------------------------------------------

This email has been sent to kwatson@enron.com at your
request, by EFI.

Visit our Subscription Center to edit your interests or unsubscribe.
http://ccprod.roving.com/roving/d.jsp?p=oo&m=993148607984&ea=kwatson@enron.com

View our privacy policy: http://ccprod.roving.com/roving/CCPrivacyPolicy.jsp

Powered by
Constant Contact(R)
www.constantcontact.com


Meeting Participants:	John Arnold
			Kevin Presto
			Brad Richter
			Jay Webb


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Yoder, Christian
Sent:	Wednesday, August 29, 2001 9:38 AM
To:	Choi, Paul; Foster, Chris H.; Semperger, Cara; Gang, Lisa; Symes, Kate; Williams III, Bill; Rawson, Lester; Rosman, Stewart
Cc:	Hall, Steve C. (Legal)
Subject:	el paso

Here is a confirm that is designed to go under our EEI agreement with El Paso.  If signed, it would entirely replace our old services consulting agreement with El Paso.

 Please read the document from a business perspective.  Do not worry too much about the legal boilerplate, of which there is plenty.  At the end of the day, the document should contain what you guys think you are doing with El Paso from a common sense perspective.  Pushing all the (very important) legal boilerplate aside:  do you see our deal in these words?? Please let me know your comments. Thanks very much ----cgy


Leslie-

Have you sent any confirmation to El Paso stating our agreement with the
imbalance and that it has been transferred to ENA?

Susan

Leslie Robinson@ENRON
01/08/2001 08:43 AM
To: Susan W Pereira/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: LRC imbalances

Koch has sent payments. LIG said they sent it but that was a month ago, so
I've followed up and am waiting to hear from Bud Elkins.  That imbalance of
11,973 due Stingray is correct but is no longer on LRP's books, it's been
assigned to ENA.  Thanks.

Susan W Pereira@ECT
01/05/2001 12:53 PM
To: Leslie Robinson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: LRC imbalances

Do you know if we have actually collected on the imbalance settlement
payments from Koch and LIG?  Also, are we in agreement with El Paso on the
Stingray imbalance volume (11,973 mmbtu due Stingray)?  I have a statement
from El Paso showing this volume.  They want us to sign and return the volume
statement.

Thanks,

Susan Pereira


Any GCP adjustments will be highlighted in red.

Best Rgds.

Samuel x3-9890
(GCP_Enron Networks)

From: Aparna Rajaram/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/05/2001 08:35 AM
To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelly Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect,
Steve Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Camille Gerard/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary G
Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Paul
Radous/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ken Curry/ENRON@enronXgate, Nicole
Hunter/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Click Paper Approvals, 3-5-01

Please see attached.

Regards,

Aparna Rajaram
ext. 5-4563


Please print on letterhead.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/08/2001 03:36
PM ---------------------------

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 01/08/2001 03:30:43 PM
To: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com>

Subject: Ltr to SEL enclosing Facility Agreements

 <<2TCV01!.DOC>>
Kay:

Per your request, enclosed is a proposed letter to SEL enclosing the final
facility agreements.  I have included a "receipt acknowledged" signature in
the proposed letter, although I believe this is optional as long as our
courier, upon delivery, obtains a signature acknowledging receipt.  Please
advise of any comments.  Thank you.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

Enclosure: 131359v1

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - 2TCV01!.DOC


State Department

http://travel.state.gov/travel_warnings.html

AFRICA Destinations

http://www.singita.co.za/intro/

http://www.ccafrica.com/destinations/southafrica/phinda/accomrock.asp

http://www.cybele.co.za/


why can't dad make it?

-----Original Message-----
From: K. Bass [mailto:daphneco64@alltel.net]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 6:34 AM
To: Bass, Eric
Subject: Birthday

Hi Eric,

Sorry but Dad can't make it Thursday night.  Would dinner here on Friday be o.k. with you?  Dad suggested games, etc., and I wanted to bake a birthday cake.  We can either order in or I would love to cook anything you would like.  It's up to you.  Let me know.

Have a great day.

Love, Mom


you should thow a rager.  congrats


I am coming to the conference but I am wary of your influences. No drinking,
and therefore no picking up cigarettes off the floor and smoking them, can be
permitted.

I have not dealt directly with HQ my self in the past and I know we have
entered into transactions with them ( I am not sure if we have done anyt
derivatives) but I would be careful of HQ.  Not only is a HQ a governmental
entity, I believe it is governed by Quebec civil law, with which us common
lawers are not overly familiar.  Quebec counsel might be necessary.

Peter.

From: Tana Jones on 08/28/2000 05:45 PM CDT
To: Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Hydro-Quebec

Oh guru of all things Canadian...

I'm working on comments to an ISDA that Hydro-Quebec sent us for an
affiliate, HQ Energy Services (U.S.) Inc., which is a Delaware corporation.
Is there anything special about Hydro-Quebec being the Guarantor, or just the
usual considerations having a governmental entity as the guarantor?

By the way, I hope you're coming up for the Legal Conference.  There are many
problems at Enron that need our help in getting sorted out, those kinds of
problems that lots of margaritas seem to bring out!  I'm counting on you!


TWanda, please calendar and then make a file entitled "Employees in Right
Company" and give to me on the date of the meeting.  Thanks a lot.  MHC
---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 02/08/2000 01:15
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Christa Aguilar @ ENRON                           02/08/2000 10:34 AM

To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kate Cole/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Pam
Butler/HR/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mary Joyce/HR/Corp/Enron@Enron, Dolores
Lenfest/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cynthia Barrow/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ann
Park/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Charles Philpott/HR/Corp/Enron@Enron, Karen
Choyce/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Felecia Acevedo/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Have we got employees in the right Company?

A meeting has been scheduled for Thursday, February 10th, from 10:00 a.m. to
11:00 a.m. in conference room EB15C1.  Please confirm with me
through e-mail or voice mail (3-5911) by Wednesday, February 9th.   Please
see below for a brief description on the meeting from Felecia Acevedo.

Thank you,
Christa

______________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________
Drew Lynch has asked that I coordinate a project to determine if we have
employees in the correct companies (for U.S. companies) and do we know the
ownership structure of both domestic and foreign companies.  We will approach
this in three phases as below:

Phase I - On our payroll system - do we have employees in the correct
companies in EPC and do we know which ones are wholly owned by Enron;

Phase II - Not on our payroll but in the U.S. -  do we know who the employees
are, what companies they work for and how our ownership is structured;

Phase III - Not on our payroll and outside the U.S. - do we know who the
employees are, what companies they work for and how our ownership is
  structured.

 I will have some preliminary work completed and would like to review it at
that time.

Felecia


What do you think about this proposal?
---------------------- Forwarded by Stephanie Miller/Corp/Enron on 04/18/2001
09:49 AM ---------------------------

"Meier, Peter" <peter.meier@neg.pge.com> on 04/18/2001 09:34:09 AM
To: "'gerald.nemec@enron.com'" <gerald.nemec@enron.com>,
"'steve.van.hooser@enron.com'" <steve.van.hooser@enron.com>,
"'wbradfo@enron.com'" <wbradfo@enron.com>, "'stephanie.miller@enron.com'"
<stephanie.miller@enron.com>
cc: "Sarti, Daniel" <daniel.sarti@neg.pge.com>, "Barron, Bob"
<bob.barron@neg.pge.com>, "Jones, Susan" <susan.jones@neg.pge.com>,
"'lisa.mellencamp@enron.com'" <lisa.mellencamp@enron.com>,
"'barry.tycholiz@enron.com'" <barry.tycholiz@enron.com>, "Barpoulis, Sarah"
<sarah.barpoulis@neg.pge.com>, "'linda.simmons@enron.com'"
<linda.simmons@enron.com>

Subject: Draft 4/9/2001

 <<Collateral Trust and Security Agr ver 1.doc>>

 I received Gerald's voice mail last night that El Paso cannot handle
an agency agreement wherein Enron would be our agent for the limited purpose
of exercising the recall right on only three of the capacity packages.
Although I find this disappointing, we obviously need to address this
development.

 We think the proper approach is to retain the firm recallable
release structure we developed.  That creates a present release into Enron's
hands of the contracts, which was Barry's stated desire.  We would retain a
recall right BUT we could only exercise it in accordance with the Support
Agreement (e.g., monthly, so long as not in default).  We understand that
you might want some further assurance that we would not misuse that right.
To that end, I have resuscitated the Collateral Trust and Security
Agreement.  In other words, we would give you a first priority lien on the
applicable transportation packages so that if we improperly recalled the
capacity (which we of course would not), you would still be the senior
secured party on the capacity and be entitled to exercise your remedies of
foreclosure.  Moreover, as Lisa and I discussed when we first considered the
security interest, this security interest would be exempted from the
automatic stay in accordance with Section 362(b)(17) of the Bankruptcy Code
and thus you would be in a position to exercise your lien notwithstanding
even the meltdown scenario of a bankruptcy.

 Please respond at youre earliest convenience.

 Peter

PG&E National Energy Group and any other
company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or
logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, the regulated California utility.  Neither
PG&E National Energy Group nor these other
referenced companies are regulated by the California Public
Utilities Commission.  Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
do not have to buy products from these companies in order
to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.

 - Collateral Trust and Security Agr ver 1.doc


Check with Ken
Assigned to: CN=Theresa Staab/OU=Corp/O=Enron
Updated by: CN=Theresa Staab/OU=Corp/O=Enron


I hope you're OK?!   You probably don't remember (especially after getting
hit by that polo ball!), but Barclays is one you negotiated on your
secondment here oh so many years ago.

It's always good to hear from you...

	Justin Boyd
	09/25/2000 11:11 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Barclays Guarantee and requested Amendment Agreement

thanks tana!

j

ps. i got hit by a polo ball on saturday!

Matthew Dawson
25/09/2000 17:04
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Barclays Guarantee and requested Amendment Agreement

Hi tana

We have recently negotiated and signed an Isda with Barclays Bank ,(ECTRIC
being the Enron Entity) which included some additional clauses in the
Schedule( regarding Enron online trading) which Barclays want to include in
the already existing ISDA  between ENA and Barclays. The details and The
suggested Amendment  Agreement are included below. Please could you take a
look at this  wording.The clauses are identical to those that we have argeed
in the latest Isda.

Good to speak to you this afternoon and I will let you know how Edmund is
doing.

Regards

Matt D
---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Dawson/LON/ECT on 25/09/2000
16:21 ---------------------------

Justin Boyd
25/09/2000 15:53
To: Matthew Dawson/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Barclays Guarantee and requested Amendment Agreement

matt

 you will need to pass this by tana jones in the US for approval

j

Matthew Dawson
25/09/2000 15:03
To: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Barclays Guarantee and requested Amendment Agreement

 Hi  Justin,

Just to let you know the Guarantee arrived from Houston this morning. I have
sent it on to Leigh. Also she requested that we amend the other Existing ISDA
Master Agreement Barclays has with Enron North America, dated 13 Jan 1994 to
include the Part 5(h) and(o)  wording dealing with  Procedures for entering
into Transactions(Online and others), and also the Part 6 wording dealing
with Additional Provisions for Commodity Derivatives Transactions.

I attatch her proposed amendment agreement. The wording of the clauses is
identical to that which was agreed in the ECTRIC  Master that has just been
signed, although the numbering of Part 5 (o) differs in the recent Isda with
ECTRIC. Barclays cannot trade with ENA until the Isda has been amended.  Are
we able to accommodate the   agreement?


As our existing businesses grow and new businesses are created, ease of
movement and development of our top talent becomes essential to our success.
As you heard at the Management Conference all officers will be titled,
reviewed, promoted, and compensated according to a more standard set of
guidelines.  The process recognizes the intrinsic value of each officer,
rather than tying that individual to the value of their specific job or
reporting relationship.

Officer titling has been standardized throughout Enron.  There are four
levels of officers: members of the Enron Office of the Chairman make up Level
4.  Level 3 includes all other members of the Enron Executive Committee.
Level 2 is made up of managing directors, including company presidents and
some senior vice presidents.  Level 1 are vice presidents and some senior
vice presidents with grandfathered titles.

This year a common evaluation process is being implemented for Level 1 and
Level 2 officers.  Officers will be evaluated by a committee, through a
process referred to as the Performance Review Committee (PRC), utilizing a
standard set of performance criteria and performance ratings.  Performance
committee reviews will occur twice a year ) in July for feedback purposes and
at year-end for feedback as well as bonus and total compensation
considerations.  The Executive Committee will handle the PRC for all Level 2
officers. Review of Level 1 officers will occur at the business-unit level
first with the results &cross calibrated8 by the Executive Committee and a
group of approximately sixteen managing directors.

The goals of the PRC process is to insure a consistent standard for our
overall pool of executive talent and to provide a tool to more effectively
utilize talent throughout the organization.  To further promote consistency
the Executive Committee will consider all promotions in January of each
year.  Exceptions, internally or externally, will be infrequent.

The individual,s performance evaluation will be the starting point for all
compensation decisions.  Compensation includes base pay, bonus and long-term
awards.  A long-term program that replaces individual or business unit plans
has been approved and will be communicated to individuals before bonus
payments are made.

In addition to the Level 1 and Level 2 reviews, business unit, global and
corporate cross-functional PRC reviews for directors, senior directors and
general managers have started.  This year-end process will be utilized as a
benchmark to determine how we further refine the evaluation process at this
level in the future.

If you should have any questions about the process, please direct them to
your Human Resources Business Unit Leads per the following:

Mary Ann Long (GPG) x36810    David Oxley (ENA/EEL/Global Trading) X33557
Ray Bennett (EES) X37039    Robert Jones (Global Technology/Global
Finance/Global
Gwen Petteway (Corp) X37351      Asset Operations/Global Engineering &
Construction) X35810
Janie Bonnard (Caribbean/Middle East/   Scott Gilchrist (Asia
Pacific/Africa/China) X67081
  LNG) X68202      Gerry Chatham (EGEP) X35141
Miguel Padron (ESA) X66552    Marla Barnard (ECI) X58158
Ranen Sengupta (India) X67967

cc: Enron Executive Committee Members

28599


A conference bridgeline has been set up for participating in the Monday
morning OGC meeting and/or Legal Committee Staff Meeting.

International (London and Brazil):
Dial In #:  801-983-4017; Passcode #:  56871

Domestic (Canada and Houston):
Dial In #:  800-713-8600; Passcode #:  56871

The OGC meeting and the Legal Committee will meet on alternate Mondays in
EB38C2 from 8:30 AM to 9:30 AM Central time.  The Legal Committee will meet
this Monday, January 22.  The next OGC meeting will be Monday, January 29.

 Office of General Counsel   Legal Committee
 Alan Aronowitz     OGC
 Mark Evans     Justin Boyd
 Barbara Gray     Michelle Cash
 Jeff Hodge     Jon Chapman
 Bruce Lundstrom    Stephen Douglas
 Travis McCullough    Peter Keohane
 Julia Murray     John Novak
 Elizabeth Sager     Marcus Von Bock und Polach
 Richard Sanders    Dan Rogers
 Lance Schuler     Paul Simons
 Mark Taylor     Stuart Zisman
 Sheila Tweed
 Randy Young

Also, Mark Haedicke understands there will be times when you may not be able
to be on this call.  When there is a Company holiday in Houston, the OGC
meeting and/or Legal Committee meeting will be held on the next business
day.  Julia Murray will head the meeting in Mark Haedicke's absence.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Janette Elbertson
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department - EB3326
Telephone:  (713) 853-7906
Fax:  (713) 646-2600
janette.elbertson@enron.com


Attached are Media Clips regarding the Blockbuster announcement:

Norman Levine
Manager, Enron Broadband Services
713-853-5010
norman_levine@enron.net


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/30/99
03:19 PM ---------------------------

"Webmaster@cera.com" <webmaster on 12/20/99 11:35:46 AM
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
cc:  (bcc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT)
Subject: CERA Multimedia Presentation:  Monday, December 20, 1999

**********************************************************************
CERA Multimedia Presentation Replay Now Available!
Monday, December 20, 1999
**********************************************************************
Title: The Merger and Acquisition Dilemma
Author: North Natural Gas Team
E-Mail Category: Conference Call, Multimedia
Product Line: North American Natural Gas

URL: http://www.cera.com/client/nag/media.cfm

This year's delayed heating season has provided much-needed breathing room
for gas markets. With significantly warm weather in November and December,
fourth quarter demand has dropped considerably below expectations, and
storage inventories have remained higher than projected.  This has
temporarily eased the upward pressure on prices, but the fundamentals remain
aligned for tighter gas markets to come.  In a December 14, 1999 Conference
Call, CERA's North American Natural Gas Team discussed the status of the
current market:

? Warm weather so far this winter released pressure in the North American
gas market - this pressure has already begun to resurface.
? Winter storage and supply appear adequate, injections next summer could
still challenge supply availability.
? Northeast price volatility will continue, with or without added pipeline
capacity.
? Canadian supply - meeting demand.

To view and listen to a replay of this presentation (an example of a new
technology we are using), please click on the link above.

**end**

Follow URL for playback.
**********************************************************************
This electronic message and attachments, if any, contain information
from Cambridge Energy Research Associates, Inc. (CERA) which is
confidential and may be privileged. Unauthorized disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this message or any attachments,
in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited.
Terms of Use: http://www.cera.com/tos.html
Questions/Comments: webmaster@cera.com
Copyright 1999. Cambridge Energy Research Associates
 - att1.htm


Hello all,

I know, I know... the updates have been few and far between. But
here it goes.

Its about 1:30 pm on a gorgeous Sunday afternoon.  I had a safe
trip to Ooty and back chaperoning the high school girls field
hockey trip. Ooty is another hill station about an 8 hour bus trip
from here. The students travel there about 3 times a semester to
compete in various sporting events. Its significantly bigger so there
are more schools (and more shopping opportunities) there to
compete with. We left Thursday afternoon and arrived Thursday
evening. On Friday, it was the outdoor field hockey competition
between 4 schools. The girls won 2nd place. On Saturday the girls
won first place in indoor hockey. Hebron, a British missionary
school, hosted the tournament. It was the first time I saw so many
people that looked like me. It was unbelievable how many blond
hair, blue-eyed people there were. Hebron was founded around the
same time Kodaikanal International School was (about 100 years
ago) and while KIS has transformed itself from a purely American
Christian school to an International School, Hebron has remained
virtually the same with regards to its Christian beginnings and to
the students enrolled. Its largely British, with Australians and New
Zealanders and very few Indian students. I had a great time getting
to know the girls and answering a lot of their questions about the
States for the 12th grade girls who have applied to colleges in the
US.

The trip was amazing, but also a bit depressing. Its so sad to travel
through. Some of the living conditions are unbelievably poor
especially in the plains. We are also so fortunate to be able to live
the way we do.  Anyways... I am also extremely busy substituting
a 9th grade English honors class. The teacher is out for 2 weeks
for a supposed spider bite and skin graph. I really wish I had paid
more attention in high school. The students are reading
Shakespeare and luckily its Romeo and Juliet. ITs about the only
Shakespeare story that anyone can fumble through. It was to
initially be a supervisory role when we thought he would be out 3
days but its now more a teaching role since hes out for 2 weeks.
Can't wait for him to return.

Gotta run. Want to try to take a nap before ultimate frisbee. Didn't
make it home until 3 am last night from Ooty. I will be sending
another email mid-March after long weekend. I am heading to the
southern state of Kerala with Priya and her family for a boating
backwaters trip through some Indian villages.

Hope all is well! Take care.

Love,
Lisa


oh, how generous of you.  You're too picky.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark.Guzman@enron.com [mailto:Mark.Guzman@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 8:32 AM
To: Katie.Trullinger@wfsg.com
Subject: RE: FW: hi!

Dude that is psycho!  But i will still give her a break because she was
cute.


FYI --

Although Milbank has stated that "EOLympics" is probably permissible use,
both Japanese and UK counsel have taken the position that this is still
impermissible use of the term "Olympics".

I know its not your first choice, Dave, but especially if we are going to
promote the game on the home page -- which can be searched by any Olympic
committee checking the Web for infringing use -- it would help to insulate us
from detection, and possibly liability - to call the game "EOL-ympics" or
even better from a detection standpoint "EOL-mpics".

Mark -- Have we trademarked the term "EOL" and if so, in what countries?

Leslie
----- Forwarded by Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT on 08/23/2000 09:26 AM -----

	"Murton, Rachel" <rachel.murton@linklaters.com>
	08/23/2000 09:22 AM

		 To: "'Leslie.hansen@enron.com'" <Leslie.hansen@enron.com>
		 cc: "'Dhudanish@enron.com'" <Dhudanish@enron.com>, "'justin.boyd@enron.com'"
<justin.boyd@enron.com>
		 Subject: olympic flier - and use of EOLympics

Further to my previous e-mail, I have now checked the flier with a
colleague in the IP department.

Providing Leslie's suggested amendments are made, the flier should not
expose Enron to passing off liability, since it is unlikely to confuse the
participants into thinking that the site is officially endorsed.  The best
thing to do, however, would be to include a disclaimer along the lines of
"the EnronOnline Competition has not been set up in collaboration with any
other parties {other than sports.rocket.com]."  Although common sense tells
us that  Enron should be able to use the word "olympic" in a disclaimer,
common sense does not necessarily seem to prevail with regards the use of
the word "olympic" in the UK, so the general wording  mentioned above should
be used!

My comment as to the possibility of fliers alerting the British Olympic
Association to the game still stands, particularly if they are to be paper
fliers.  If they are just to be e-mails, I guess the practical risk is less.
[I'm sure this has already been thought of, but if the flier is to be
e-mailed out, it can't be sent as Enrononline.com OlympicsMailer!]

On this point, am I still "up to date" in thinking that the proposal is
still to mention the word "olympic" in explaining the rules of teh game.

Regarding the use of EOLympics, from a UK point of view, this should
definately be avoided - as explained in an earlier e-mail of today, one of
the actions that "in particular" (i.e. definately!) infringes the Olympic
Symbol Protection Act is "offering or supplying services under a sign which
consists of or contains  the word olympic - it would be difficult to argue
that EOLympic does not contain the word "olympic"!

Thanks

Rachel

____________________________________________________________

This message is confidential. It may also be privileged or
otherwise protected by work product immunity or other legal
rules. If you have received it by mistake please let us know
by reply and then delete it from your system; you should not
copy the message or disclose its contents to anyone.
____________________________________________________________


Jeff - Thanks for hosting the meeting.  PG& still needs to decide what it
really wants out of the gas accord, but I hope you gained some insight into
our thinking. Keep in mind that Enron is still viewed around here with
suspicion - something we all need to get over with.  I would not give up on
going to higher levels in the company to pursue business opportunities.  I'm
told through the grapevine that you made one attempt and got no response.
Take the energizer bunny approach.  Who knows where it may lead.


Bob:

Kim is out of the offfice today, so I will be helping out.  My number is
503/464-3822.

Here is a copy of the new transaction agreement.

Forward indicative prices are:
February $10.25
March  $9.50.

You can do a fixed price for any portion of your needs.  Let me know if you
want to get final prices later today (or this week) and I can close the deal
for you.  Please note that prices could change between now and when you
transact.

Markets are up strongly today in anticpation of Wed. storage report.

Chris
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT on 01/09/2001
09:39 AM ---------------------------

Dan J Hyvl
01/09/2001 08:34 AM
To: Kim Ward/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tori
Kuykendall/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Akzo Nobel, Inc. Confirmation Letter

The above letter has been modified to reflect that Buyer may terminate by
providing notice to Seller at least five days prior to the date established
by SoCalGas for terminating authorized marketer arrangements.


----- Forwarded by David M Gagliardi/TTG/HouInd on 10/12/01 07:56 AM -----

                    "Gagliardi,
                    Michael"             To:     "'dgagliardi@reliantenergy.com'" <dgagliardi@reliantenergy.com>,
                    <mgagliardi@un        "'david.ricks@spotplus.com'" <david.ricks@spotplus.com>,
                    ocal.com>             "'tony.a.rogers@fritolay.com'" <tony.a.rogers@fritolay.com>
                                         cc:
                    10/12/01 07:26       Subject:     FW: True Orange E-Mail/Fax No. 100
                    AM

> -----Original Message-----
> From:         TruOrange@aol.com [SMTP:TruOrange@aol.com]
> Sent:         Thursday, October 11, 2001 10:18 PM
> To:           TruOrange@aol.com
> Subject:           True Orange E-Mail/Fax No. 100
>
> True Orange E-Mail/Fax Service
> Volume 9, E-Mail/Fax #100, Thursday, October 11, 2001
> Jerry Scarbrough's True Orange, P. O. Box 26530, Austin, Texas 78755 -
> Phone
> 512-795-8536
>
> Brown Says Benson Might Start Saturday at Oklahoma State
>
> Coach Mack Brown said Thursday freshman RB Cedric Benson "has had a good
> week
> of practice and we'll make a decision at gametime on whether he or Ivan
> (Williams) will start."
> Benson has run with the first team in practice all week after making only
> a
> cameo appearance in the loss to Oklahoma Saturday, and Brown said the
> coaches
> plan to use him more for the rest of the season.
> Benson has great acceleration through the line of scrimmage and the
> Longhorn
> offensive linemen can usually open a hole briefly against a good defense.
> He
> has a much better chance of getting through a small hole than the
> 240-pound
> Williams, who requires a step or two to get much acceleration.
> Brown also said DE Kaelen Thornton (sprained knee) and TB Victor Ike
> (bruised
> ribs) have not been able to practice this week and won't make the trip to

> Stillwater this weekend. He said DT Maurice Gordon, a former DE, will
move
>
> back to end at start in Thornton's place and he said sophomore DT Adam
> Doiron
> will start at tackle when Texas is in its base 4-3 defense.
> The Longhorns might return to a 4-3 at times against Oklahoma State
> Saturday,
> and they probably will use it a lot next week when a power-running
> Colorado
> team comes to Austin, but they have used a 3-4 most of the time in their
> last
> two games against pass oriented Oklahoma and Texas Tech.
> Brown said earlier in the week that several starters on offense were in
> danger of losing their jobs, but he softened that statement a little
> Thursday, saying, "We may rotate three guards and Derrick Dockery might
> play
> a little more at tackle and Jason Glynn might play a little more."
> What that means is a probable three-way rotation at guard between
Dockery,
>
> Antwan Kirk-Hughes and Tillmon Holloway, with Dockery sliding out to
> tackle
> to replace Robbie Doane at times, and a two-way rotation at center with
> Matt
> Anderson and Glynn splitting time.
> Brown also said the team has been practicing hard this week and trying to
> put
> the tough loss to Oklahoma behind them.
> "The fans don't have to get ready until Saturday," he said, "but the
> coaches
> and players have to start getting ready on Monday."
> Brown also was asked about a story in Thursday's Fort Worth Star Telegram

> alleging he telephoned the prosecutor in a sexual misconduct suit against

> former Shreveport Evangel head coach Dennis Dunn and offered to be a
> character witness for Dunn. A minor girl in Marshall has accused Dunn of
> improper sexual conduct.
> Brown said he would have only one comment on that and that comment was:
"I
>
> would be happy to be a character witness for Dennis Dunn, who has been a
> friend of mind for more than 20 years."
> * * * *
> RECRUITING NOTES:  Add another big, fast linebacker to the list of
players
>
> Texas has offered a scholarship. He is Michael Williams, 6-3, 220, 4.6,
of
>
> Lindale, who is so fast he plays wide receiver on offense. Williams, who
> already has a qualifying test score, told me he has offers from Texas,
> Oklahoma, Texas A&M, Baylor, Minnesota and West Virginia. He also told me
> he
> probably will commit to someone in "the next couple of weeks." He also
> said
> he plans to attend the Texas-Colorado game on October 20. The Longhorns
> have
> a very good chance to get him. . . There are a lot of national top 100
> lists
> available, but I think one of the best is the Rivals 100 list on the
> internet. It ranks players from No. 1 to No. 100. Texas already has
> commitments from No. 21 WR Marquis Johnson of Champaign, Ill.; No. 80 DE
> Chase Pittman of Shreveport Evangel and No. 83 OL Neale Tweedie of Allen.
> The
> Longhorns also are in the running for 15 other players on the list. They
> are
> No. 2 RB Lorenzo Booker of Ventura, Cal., St. Bonaventure, No. 7. DT
> Roderique Wright of Alief Hastings, No. 11 QB Vincent Young of Houston
> Madison, No. 16 OL Justin Blalock of Plano East, No. 29 DE Bryan Pickryl
> of
> Jenks, Okla., No. 32 WR Robert Timmons of Flower Mound Marcus, No. 37 DE
> Larry Dibbles of Lancaster, No. 46 DE Zack Latimer of Aurora, Colo., No.
> 48
> LB Aaron Harris of North Mesquite, No. 49 DE Travis Leitko of The
> Woodlands,
> No. 59 TE Eric Winston of Midland Lee, No. 71 DT Marco Martin of
Mesquite,
>
> No. 75 Ath Edorian McCullough of North Garland, No. 87 RB Selvin Young of

> Jersey Village and No. 100 Ath DaBryan Blanton  of Forney. They have at
> least
> a 50-50 shot at Wright, Young, Blalock, Timmons, Dibbles, Harris and
> Martin.
> * * * *
> My next e-mail/fax will be whenever events warrant.-
> * * * *
> The True Orange E-Mail/Fax Service includes  at  least  99 fax/e-mails  a

> year and costs $99 ($79 by E-Mail). The True Orange Newsletter includes
> 26
> newsletters and is published weekly during football season and twice
> monthly
> during most of the other months. It costs $45. Save by subscribing to
both
>
> for $130 (or $110 if you take the faxes via E-Mail  or $99 if you take
> both
> services via E-Mail). Send check  to address at the top of page. I also
> update my 900 number - 1-900-288-8839 - daily with recruiting news. My
> E-Mail address is: truorange@aol.com.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/02/2001
08:33 AM ---------------------------

"Sogomonian, Aram" <Aram.Sogomonian@pacificorp.com> on 01/31/2001 07:56:39 PM
To: "'vkamins@enron.com'" <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: California Electricity Crisis: What to do

For your reading enjoyment.

We should shoot for breakfast on Thursday morning Feb. 8th.

FYI.  The following link will take you to a joint statement about what to
do in the California electricity crisis.

http://haas.berkeley.edu/news/california_electricity_crisis.html

William W. Hogan
John F. Kennedy School of Government
Harvard University
79 John F. Kennedy Street
Cambridge, MA 02138
617-495-1317 (o)
617-495-1635 (f)
email: william_hogan@harvard.edu
web page: www.whogan.com
or
http://ksgwww.harvard.edu/people/whogan


Resume being scanned.  Currently only have hard copy.