-----Original Message-----
From: Davis, Dana
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 9:16 AM
To: Frank Telemaque
Subject:

Good Morning.  How was your night?

-----Original Message-----
From: Frank Telemaque [mailto:Frank_Telemaque@flexitallic.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 9:07 AM
To: Davis, Dana
Subject: RE: Hey

good morning dana,what up baby.

-----Original Message-----
From: Davis, Dana [ mailto:Dana.Davis@ENRON.com
<mailto:Dana.Davis@ENRON.com> ]
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 1:23 PM
To: frank_telemaque@flexitallic.com
Subject: Hey

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.

**********************************************************************

INSIST UPON GENUINE FLEXITALLIC GASKETS!
Anything else is just a copy.


Elizabeth Fredericks
36609 Park View Terrace
Yucaipa, CA 92399
elizabeth.fredericks@hope.edu

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Elizabeth Fredericks


Stinson and Vince,

I finalized the presentation for John Lavorato, he said he is ready
to present it  to Greg.  He is happy with the work we provided.

I will be on vocation starting next week.  I attached the simulation models
here in case that you need them.  The OC version deals with open-close
trading and CC version deals with continuous trading.

Should you have any questions, or need to run different scenarios, please
call me at home.  Otherwise, I will see you next year.

Merry Chrismas and Happy New Year !

Zimin


Let me know if she doesn't solve your problems.
---------------------- Forwarded by John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron on 07/07/2000
04:14 PM ---------------------------
Beth Perlman @ ECT   07/07/2000 08:29 AM

To: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristin
Albrecht/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randy Matson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sally
Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Zhiyong Wei/HOU/ECT@ECT, Philippe A Bibi/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Power Port Calc Issues

John,

As of Wednesday, we have a resource from Sun Microsystems that is helping  us
isolate the problems we're having with the UNIX operating system and our
code.  This resource has requested that we bring on an additional application
specialist from SUN.  This has been authorized and the additional resource is
scheduled to be on site next week.  I also have my resources and the UNIX
administrators working along side the Sun resources.

As an aside, we are also experiencing performance problems with the gas side
of the business.  I met with Sally Beck's controllers yesterday and we are
putting a plan in place.  The increased trading volumes have seriously
impacted our through put and we now have a 'blitz' on to correct the issues.

These problems have not gone unnoticed.  I assure you that IT has been very
diligent in following through on these problems.  We're investing heavily in
additional hardware, bringing in contractors and hiring additional resources
at an average of 5 - 8 per week.  I will keep you posted as we continue to
enhance our existing systems.

Beth

	John J Lavorato@ENRON
	07/06/2000 07:46 PM

		 To: Beth Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Power Port Calc Issues

Beth

Please respond with a plan to solve these problems.

Thanks John
---------------------- Forwarded by John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron on 07/06/2000
07:42 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Kevin M Presto @ ECT                           07/05/2000 07:39 PM

To: John Lavorato
cc: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristin Albrecht/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beth
Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Power Port Calc Issues

Guys,
This Enpower calc issue is a joke.   How can we be the most Innovative
Company in the world and cannot fix a risk book calculation problem.
Furthermore, how can we effectively grow our volumes and complexity of our
power transactions when our back office (risk books, position management,
settlements) is so unreliable from an IT standpoint.

In addition, we will start losing all of our key people in this area because
they are here until 8:30-9:00 every night and 4:00 pm on "holidays".  This
whole issue is a significant business risk for Enron and needs to be dealt
with accordingly.

Please advise.  Thank you.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT on 07/05/2000
07:27 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kristin Albrecht                           07/05/2000 11:30 AM

To: Beth Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randy Matson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jarod
Jenson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christine Nguyen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Zhiyong Wei/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Ravi Ramachandran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey W White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jenny
Latham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jenny Rub/GPGFIN/Enron@Enron
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim
Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Power Port Calc Issues

The Power risk group continues to experience severe instability with the
power port calc.  The same memory allocation issue which I discussed in the
message below is not resolved (we have had this problem for about four months
now).  Due to business reasons, we calculated the east power books on Monday
(Enron holiday).  We received all of the required data to calc by 9:30 AM and
should have been completely done by 11:30.  However, the calc crashed six
times and finally completed on the seventh try.  We were able to leave by
4:00.  The point I am trying to make is that I feel that we are at such a
state that there is risk that we could not provide positions to the traders
by the start of the next business day.  This could have a financial impact on
our company.  Once again, I am urgently and desperately asking for resolution
of this problem.
Furthermore, it came to my attention on Friday that EES is now using EnPower
and the power port calc and they too are using the same server that we are.
I question this decision since we cannot seem to support the existing
business that is using that server.  Per discussion with Kevin Presto, the
agreement made regarding EES's use of EnPower was there would be no expense
or degradation to ENA's business process.  I think they need to move to
another server.
Please call to discuss when this will be resolved.  Thank You.
Kristin Albrecht
3-4763

---------------------- Forwarded by Kristin Albrecht/HOU/ECT on 07/05/2000
09:35 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kristin Albrecht                           05/15/2000 09:48 AM

To: Beth Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randy Matson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jarod
Jenson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christine Nguyen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Zhiyong Wei/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Ravi Ramachandran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey W White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jenny
Latham/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: athena vs quark

With regards to the message below, we must have athena (server) to run our
nightly risk books for the power group.  We run one of our three east power
calcs on this machine (the second largest one).  Since an acceptable solution
for the big power calc has not been provided to us, athena CANNOT be taken
away from us.  The east power calc crashed 3 out of 5 days last week.  We
usually start calcing at about 4:00.  The calc time is now running at 1.5
hours and we have about 1.5 hours' worth of work after the calc's successful
completion.  So you do the math on what time my group leaves the building
when the calc crashes at 4:30.
Furthermore, the West power calc has crashed 3 out of 5 nights weekly for the
last 3 weeks.  This is not acceptable.
We are about to enter the busiest and most volatile time of the year and our
system is not stable.  I feel like we have been very patient at the expense
of many late nights.  I am going to speak to Kevin Presto and Tim Belden
today about these problems.
I think we need to meet immediately about this problem and I am exhausted
with the finger pointing between different IT groups.
Thanks.
Kristin Albrecht
---------------------- Forwarded by Kristin Albrecht/HOU/ECT on 05/15/2000
09:27 AM ---------------------------

Christine Nguyen
05/12/2000 01:01 PM
To: Ravi Ramachandran/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Randy Matson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: athena vs quark

Ravi,
       Please advise your users that athena will be completely unavailable
starting
Wednesday17May2000.  The production server is quark (12gb RAMx18procs).
quark is configured to our standard for your use.
Thanks,
-Christine


----- Forwarded by Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT on 01/22/2001 03:48 PM -----

	Barbara N Gray
	Sent by: Legal Temp 1
	10/04/2000 03:56 PM

		 To: Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Form - Incoming Guaranty

Please find the attached incoming Guaranty form.  Regards, bng


?

?
http://www.msnbc.com/news/INFECTIOUS_front.asp?bt=nm&btu=http://www.msnbc.com/
tools/newstools/d/news_menu.asp
 - MSNBC Flu Front Page 1009 AM ET Wednesday, December 06, 2000.url


Yes Tana I do indeed remember meeting you.  Let me give you some background
to our trading operation in Australia. As you mentioned at present we are
only authorised to trade financial power. We expect to be trading weather and
potentially crude oil derivatives soon. As far as the scope of our ISDA
Agreements is concerned I will forward to you a response I sent to Jana Morse
yesterday on this topic.

Our GTCs have been drafted specifically for Australian power.

If Australian counerparties wished to trade other products then the ISDA
negotiations are handled through Houston and not through Sydney.

As far extra provisions for Australian counterparties dealing in North
American products - nothing particularly comes to mind. Clearly the document
needs to be validly executed and the Australian Company Number should appear
after the name. The choice of law clause should be effective. The challenge
can on occasions be procedural points such as service of notices. Enforcing a
foreign judgment in Australia as in the United States is not an automatic
process but should be possible.

Sorry tax is a little out of my area. Susan Musch is the best person to
consult.

A Letter of Credit should present few difficulties if properly worded and
issued by an appropriate bank. Guaranties are considerably more complex issue
and difficult to cover in a brief email. Needless to say it all depends on
the facts. But if validly executed by a parent company that is unlikely to go
into receivership or liquidation then it should OK.

To: David Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rod Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R
Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT,
David Forster/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Online Trading for Australia

David,

I know we've met before on your visits to Houston, I am a paralegal in the
ENA Legal Department, in the Swap Group under Mark Taylor.  I am the lead
contact in ENA Legal for counterparty approvals and day to day trading issues
for EnronOnline.  I coordinate responses for the whole Legal Trading Group
(financial, physical, power and emerging markets) with the EnronOnline and
Credit teams.

I understand from my EnronOnline team that I am going to need to approve
financial trading for all my Houston based counterparties a week from
Friday.  Right now that list stands at about 600 counterparties (already
trading).   I was hoping you could direct me as to what restrictions, if any,
we might have for financial trading in Australia.  Are there any restricted
counterparties, such as governmentals, utilities, banks, dealers, etc., or
any restrictions on the products traded (initially I know we are only trading
financial power, although I'm sure the list will expand over time).   Have
your GTC's been drafted with cross-border trading in mind?

Similarly, I assume there will be Australian counterparties signing up to
trade, and the commercial team will want them approved to trade the whole
range of EnronOnline products.   Are there any provisions we must add to the
form of North American product GTCs if our counterparties trade a North
American product from Australia?  Do we have any tax issues or language we
need to cover?  Our standard form of GTC includes New York law and
arbitration.  Will that be enforceable in Australia?  Are there any issues we
need to address if we require collateral (a guaranty or letter of credit)
with respect to a trade?

Thanks for your help!


FYI.  It looks like we can move ahead with Karen in a temporary assignment, without her losing anything in the transition package offered by EBS.  However ... it may be more difficult to move her to the analyst position than we thought.  She is listed in peoplefinder as a senior admin., but she is actually a number of pay levels below that ... .

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kaufman, Paul
Sent:	Monday, September 24, 2001 11:08 AM
To:	Hill, Jo Ann
Subject:	RE: Letter for Karen Huang

Do we want say anything about not filling the administrative assistant position during the 30-day period--so she knows that she will "be considered" for the AA job if the evaluation for the professional position doesn't pan out the way she wants it to?  Also re:  date.  I want to know whether she's interested in the assignment by October 31.

Re:  Rick.  Yes.  I think we need to send it along to him.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hill, Jo Ann
Sent:	Monday, September 24, 2001 10:40 AM
To:	Kaufman, Paul
Subject:	Letter for Karen Huang

Paul -- please review and let me know if you'd like to make any revisions.  I can then send to Karen today.  Also, do you need to run this by Rick?  Please let me know if you'd like for me to discuss with him.

Thanks.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Karen -- as you are aware, your current position as Administrative Assistant to Scott Bolton will be ending as of Monday, October 1st, at which time you are scheduled for 45 days of redeployment.  As an alternative, the following option is being proposed:

Due to the resignation of the Administrative Assistant in the Portland Government Affairs office, Paul Kaufman and Alan Comnes have an immediate need for an Administrative Assistant.  We are also aware of your desire to advance into a professional level position within the Government Affairs group.  In order to meet the objectives of both the office and your goals, we would like to extend you the opportunity to work as the administrative assistant in the group for an initial 31-day assignment.  During this period (October 1-31), you will fill the administrative needs of the department in addition in allowing Paul to perform an evaluation of your skills and growth potential into a professional role in Goverment Affairs.  At the conclusion of this assignment, if there is not a continued opportunity for you to continue to work in the administrative assistant's role with the potential of future growth into a professional level position, you will then be allowed to enter into your 45-day redeployment period.

Please let me know if you have any questions regarding this option or would like to discuss further.  I can be reached at
713-853-0363.  Please let me know your decision no later than _______________ .


they told me to send in the resume to h.r.


I have set up a tentative conference call with the city of Palo Alto to meet
regarding our Management Services Agreement and their comments.  They intend
to have both their City Attorney and outside council at this meeting.  If
this conflicts with your schedule, please let me know.  As soon as Palo Alto
confirms this time, I will let you know.

Thanks,

Kim
 -----Original Message-----
From:  Presas, Jessica
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 3:00 PM
To: Ward, Kim S.
Subject: Conference Call EB32C2

 CONFERENCE CALL
 Thursday, May 31 @ 3:00 in room EB32C2.


Vince,

I have enclosed a summary of our proposed approach on calculation of notional and the greeks for dual trigger option portfolio.  Please let us know your thoughts/comments.

Amitava


Critical Migration Information:

1. Your scheduled Outlook Migration Date is THE EVENING OF : May 15th
2. You need to press the "Save My Data" button (only once) to send us your
pre-migration information.
3. You must be connected to the network before you press the button.
4. If a POP-UP BOX appears, prompting you to "ABORT, CANCEL OR TRUST SIGNER"
please  select TRUST SIGNER.
5. Any information you Add to your Personal Address Book, Journal or calendar
after you click on the button will need to be manually re-added into Outlook
after you have been migrated.
6. Clicking this button does not complete your migration to Outlook. Your
migration will be completed  the evening of your migration date.

    Failure to click on the button means you WILL NOT get your Calendar,
Contacts, Journal and ToDo information imported into Outlook the day of your
migration and could result in up to a 2 week delay to restore this
information.

If you encounter any errors please contact the resolution center @
713-853-1411


Almost no notice is needed as long as the Products you intend to use are ones which previously appeared on EnronOnline.

Please note that Jan. 21 is a holiday, so we are planning on the launch of NetcoOnline happening on Tuesday, Jan. 22.

Thanks for the info.

Dave

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Martin, Thomas A.
Sent:	Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:34 AM
To:	Forster, David
Subject:	RE: Texas Desk EOL Product Rollout Schedule

Sorry, I thought you already had that info.  Phase 1 is the day we turn on EOL (January 21st), Phase 2 is February.  This timing should be consistent with the other gas regions.  Basically financial products first and physical products second.  If there is any changes between products in phase 1 and phase 2, how much lead time do you need?

Tom

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Forster, David
Sent:	Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:27 AM
To:	Martin, Thomas A.
Subject:	RE: Texas Desk EOL Product Rollout Schedule

Tom,

Thanks for the info.

What dates are you associating with Phase 1 and Phase 2?

Dave

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Martin, Thomas A.
Sent:	Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:12 AM
To:	Forster, David
Cc:	Winfree, O'Neal D.; Redmond, Brian
Subject:	Texas Desk EOL Product Rollout Schedule

As a follow up to the Texas Business plan submitted on January 7th, please find more detail on our desired product rollout schedule during phase 1 and 2.  If you have any questions call me at ext. 33079.

Tom

 << File: TXEOLRollout.xls >>


Thank you for your request. You will be notified by email when your request
has been processed. You can check the progress of your request by clicking
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000030395&Page=
MyReq.


OK for me.

	Lisa Lees
	11/07/2000 03:19 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Stacey Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: US Gas Phy Index Firm 5-day Flexible non-TX>1Mo<1Yr - Approval
Required!

Tana/Karen:

The product long description below will fall under the new product type US
Gas Phy Index Firm 5-day Flexible non-TX>1Mo<1Yr.  Credit (Tom Moran) has
approved copying the profiles for the new product type from the following:

US Gas Phy Index Firm non-TX>1Mo<1Yr

Please respond by 10 a.m. on Wednesday, November 8.

Thank you.
---------------------- Forwarded by Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT on 11/07/2000 02:13 PM
---------------------------

From:  Melba Lozano
  11/01/2000 04:52 PM

To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bjorn
Hagelmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen H Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert B
Cass/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: US Gas Phy Index Firm 5-day Flexible non-TX>1Mo<1Yr - Approval
Required!

Your review and approval of the following product type in the EOL Datamanager
is needed. This product already exists for products less than 1month.

Mark:  Stacey Dickson has already approved this language.

EXAMPLE:

A US Gas Transaction with Enron North America Corp. (ENA), under which (A)
where ENA is the Buyer,  ENA shall deliver to Counterparty and Counterparty
shall receive a quantity of natural gas equal to the volume submitted by the
Counterparty via the website for delivery on each day during the Period of
Delivery (the sum of the daily volumes shall equal the 'Total Volume'), and
Counterparty shall deliver to ENA and ENA shall receive a quantity of natural
gas for delivery on each of the Purchase Dates during a calendar month, where
(i) the volume of gas delivered on any Purchase Date shall not exceed 20
percent of the Total Volume for that calendar month and (ii) the volume  of
gas delivered on all Purchase Dates shall be in increments such that that the
sum of said increments equals the Total Volume for that calendar month, or
(B) where ENA is the Seller,  Counterparty shall deliver to ENA  and ENA
shall receive a quantity of natural gas equal to the volume submitted by the
Counterparty via the website for delivery on each day during the Period of
Delivery (the 'Total Volume'), and ENA shall deliver to Counterparty and
Counterparty shall receive a quantity of natural gas for delivery on each of
the Purchase Dates during a calendar month, where the volume of gas delivered
on any Purchase Date shall not exceed 20 percent of the Total Volume for that
calendar month and the volume of gas delivered on all Purchase Dates shall be
in increments such that that the sum of said increments equals the Total
Volume for that calendar month. All deliveries shall be on a firm basis.

The Contract Price shall be the price derived from the Index for that
calendar month, as adjusted by the price submitted by the Counterparty via
the website. The Buyer shall pay the Contract price for each calendar month
during the Period  for gas received. The Seller shall pay the Index for each
calendar month for gas received.

The term of the Transaction shall be from the Effective Date of __ ___ 2000
to the Termination Date of __  ____ 2000.

The transaction is for delivery at Columbia, Appalachian. The Period of
Delivery shall be from the effective date through the termination date. The
Purchase Dates shall be each of no less than five days as designated by Buyer
within each calendar month during the Period of Delivery. Buyer shall notify
Seller by facsimile of Buyer's designation of a Purchase Date by no later
than 10:45 a.m. Central Prevailing Time on the due date of the pipeline
nomination for the day on which Buyer desires the gas to flow.

The Index for each calendar month shall be the Columbia Gas Transmission
Corp., Appalachia (W. Va., Ohio, Ky.) price as listed in the section entitled
"Prices of Spot Gas Delivered to Pipelines", published in the first issue in
such month of Inside Ferc's Gas Market Report.

The price is quoted in US Dollars per unit of volume, which will be the
Contractual Currency.

The unit of measure against which the price is quoted shall be millions of
British thermal units and the quantity shown shall be in millions of BTUs per
day.


Dan: Relative to support of California issues for "EES/OLDCO", once Jim and his group begin supporting  NETCO, there will be staff remaining (clearly, staffing will be tight, and it's still my hope that Jim decides to stay with "OLDCO/NEWCO) in regulatory affairs (5 professionals including myself) to support you and others on California as well as all other issues for "EES/OLDCO as well as NEWCO....Thanks...Rick

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Leff, Dan
Sent:	Wednesday, January 09, 2002 10:36 AM
To:	Steffes, James D.; Blachman, Jeremy; Dietrich, Janet; Dasovich, Jeff; Shapiro, Richard; Delainey, David W.; Sharp, Vicki; Smith, Mike D.
Subject:	CPUC - CA

Jim -

Following up on our discussion.......

Thank you for taking the lead to prep and set up a meeting(s) to get the appropriate team(s) prepared to testify on January 24, 2002.

I realize that there will be many different activities underway in the next couple of weeks, and we all include maintaining / maximizing the value of the CA book and the CPUC activities as critically important.

Thanks - Dan


Ina,

Can you get a conference room on 32 for this meeting on Wednesday and let Becky Cantrell know.

thank you
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cantrell, Rebecca
Sent:	Monday, June 25, 2001 2:22 PM
To:	Allen, Phillip K.
Cc:	Lawner, Leslie; Fulton, Donna
Subject:	RE: Meeting to discuss West gas desk "FERC messages"

Works for us.  I've scheduled 47C1 at 10:30.  If you'd rather get a conference room on 32, just let me know.

Thanks.

From:	Phillip K Allen/ENRON@enronXgate on 06/25/2001 03:48 PM
To:	Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject:	RE: Meeting to discuss West gas desk "FERC messages"

Becky,

How about Wednesday morning at 10:30 am?

Phillip

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cantrell, Rebecca
Sent:	Monday, June 25, 2001 11:09 AM
To:	Allen, Phillip K.
Cc:	Lawner, Leslie; Fulton, Donna
Subject:	Meeting to discuss West gas desk "FERC messages"

Phillip -- Would you have some time Wednesday afternoon to meet with Leslie Lawner and me (and Donna Fulton in the D.C. office by phone) to discuss what we could be doing for you at FERC in the next few months?

---------------------- Forwarded by Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT on 06/25/2001 12:58 PM ---------------------------

James D Steffes@ENRON
06/24/2001 09:56 AM
To:	Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:	Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sscott3@enron.com, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject:	RE: Western Wholesale Activities - Gas & Power Conf. Call Privileged & Confidential Communication Attorney-Client Communication and Attorney Work Product Privileges Asserted

Following up on Alan's comment to Phillip --

I've asked the RTO heads to think about 6 month and 18 month "plans".  What about something like this for gas?

Jim

---------------------- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 06/24/2001 09:55 AM ---------------------------
From:	Alan Comnes/ENRON@enronXgate on 06/24/2001 02:46 AM
To:	Ray Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Steve Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, jalexander@gibbs-bruns.com@SMTP@enronXgate, Phillip K Allen/ENRON@enronXgate, Linda J Noske/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dave Perrino/SF/ECT@ECT, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Robert Frank/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie Miller/ENRON@enronXgate, Barry Tycholiz/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:	Bernadette Hawkins/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject:	RE: Western Wholesale Activities - Gas & Power Conf. Call Privileged & Confidential Communication Attorney-Client Communication and Attorney Work Product Privileges Asserted

Per last week's call, I am circulating updated FERC staff talking points to the entire Western Wholesale group.  This version of the talking points incorporates comments from Steffes, Walton, and Perrino.

Phillip Allen: people on the call were wondering if there are any informal messages the West gas desk would like to relay to FERC staff. Notes, however, that ex parte contacts such as these generally must avoid issues that are being currently litigated by the FERC.

 << File: FERC Western Message Points 062301.doc >>

<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>


In response to your e-mail please see the attached draft sent to Trans
Canada.  Be advised Trans Canada was less than eager to negotiate this
agreement and as of today there has been no action.   It would be great to
get both  executed!!

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490

	James L Copeland/ENRON@enronXgate
	02/27/2001 01:02 PM

		 To: Christina Finelli/HOU/EES@EES
		 cc: Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: RE: Master Purchase and Sale Information Worksheet for TransCanada
Energy Marketing USA, Inc.

Christy, I am going to speak with Debra Perlingiere in ENA Legal to obtain
the most recent version of the Master between ENA and Transcanada Energy
Marketing USA, Inc. and will forward it when I receive it.  I also will check
into the status of that unexecuted Master as it may be that we can assist in
getting both executed at the same time.  Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Finelli, Christina
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 11:50 AM
To: Copeland, James L.
Subject: Re: Master Purchase and Sale Information Worksheet for TransCanada
Energy Marketing USA, Inc.

James, thanks for the info.  Yes, I agree they should be the same.  Is there
a chance I could get a copy of the one ENA sent out to them, not only would
it show me how ENA worded certain things but would show me where ENA and EES
agreements are different, so I can make sure we have same info.  If you could
send me a copy of ENA's proposal to TransCanada that would be helpful.

Thanks. Christy

From: James L Copeland/ENRON@enronXgate on 02/27/2001 11:43 AM
To: Christina Finelli/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Jesus Guerra/HOU/EES@EES, Russell Diamond/ENRON@enronXgate, Veronica
Espinoza/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject: Master Purchase and Sale Information Worksheet for TransCanada
Energy Marketing USA, Inc.

Christy, attached please find the Master Purchase and Sale Information
Worksheet for TransCanada Energy Marketing USA, Inc.

Please note that Russell Diamond and Veronica Espinoza have been working on
executing a Master Purchase and Sale Agreement with the same counterparty on
behalf of ENA.  I have based the EES Master Worksheet off of the ENA Master
Worksheet to remain consistent.  My understanding from talking with Veronica
and Russell is that this Master is not yet executed.

In negotiating the ENA Master, a $60MM Enron Corp. guarantee has been issued
benefiting TransCanada Energy USA, Inc.  In addition, TransCanada Pipelines
Ltd. has issued Enron and any of its subsidiaries a $60MM guarantee on behalf
of its sub, TransCanada Energy USA, Inc.

Putting in place an executed Master is definitely the only way to go as it
will allow us to net exposures between EES and the counterparty.  Please let
me know how the status of the Master progresses or if you need my assistance
to facilitate.  Thanks for your help.

 << File: TransCanada Energy Marketing USA, Inc. Master Worksheet.xls >>


Quick question:

I was wondering if you know anyone who could benefit
from a better understanding of energy derivatives, risk
 management policy, gas-to-electricity arbitrage, statistics or
 electric power trading.

 If you do, please make them aware of  PGS Energy Training's
upcoming seminars in downtown Houston (in February) and
downtown Philadelphia (March).
 http://www.pgsenergy.com/schedule.html

Available seminars include:
    1) Fundamentals of Energy Futures, Options & Derivatives
    2) Fundamentals of the Electric Power Industry
    3) Gas-to-Electricity Arbitrage & How to Maximize the
        Profitability of Electric Generation Assets
    4) Developing Effective Risk Management Policies
        & Procedures (John Wengler)
    5) Fundamentals of Statistical Analysis (Dr. Ken Skinner)
    6) How to Value Electric Generation Assets as Real Options
    7) Fundamentals of Value-at-Risk (Soli Forouzan)

For seminar dates and hotel information, call 412-279-9298
or visit  http://www.pgsenergy.com/schedule.html

 You can also save money by bringing a group of 4 or more.
 With a group rate, your cost for $1,295 seminars is reduced
 to $895 per attendee-- a savings of $1,600 from regular
 prices. The group price for the $695 programs is $495.

As you know, successful people invest the they time need to
improve their career prospects and increase their value to
their organization.  Hope to see you there!

 John Adamiak
PGS Energy Training


Hello All:

We will be celebrating John's 3rd and Henry's 5th birthdays

APRIL 13th (Saturday) @ 4:30 p.m. @ our home.

Please mark your calendars, give us a call and confirm your attendance.

Hope everyone can make it.

Sheila & Erik

_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx


plz ignore last note.  sorry, jeff


There is one completed unit going into TurboPark.  The address is listed
below.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/11/2000 10:55
AM ---------------------------

	From:  Rebecca Walker                           12/11/2000 10:42 AM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: ABB Address/Equipment Status

Kay

Karla Hesketh at ABB gave me the following information about transformer
status and location:

LNL 9521-1 and LNL 9521-2 (Austin) are at the Austin job site.
LNL 9517-5 and LNL 9517-6 (ESA) have been cancelled.
LNL 9518-1 and LNL 9518-2 (LV Cogen) are not scheduled to ship until 7/31/0.
LNL 9517-1 (PSCO) went into storage on 11/30/00.
LNL 9517-2 (PSCO) is scheduled to go into storage on 12/20/00.
LNL 9517-3 (PSCO) is scheduled to go into storage on 12/21/00.
LNL 9517-4 (Coral) is scheduled to go into storage on 12/31/00.

The storage facilities are located on-site at the ABB factory at the
following address:

4350 Semple Ave.
St. Louis, Missouri  63120

Please let me know if you need any other information.

Thanks,
Rebecca
x57968


---------------------- Forwarded by Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron on 02/07/2000
04:48 PM ---------------------------

royal_b_edmondson@reliantenergy.com on 02/07/2000 04:45:52 PM
To: ami_Chokshi@enron.com
cc:

Subject:

(See attached file: egmnom-Feb.xls)

 - egmnom-Feb.xls


Is there a person who can attach a name and number to this request?  I
receive many requests daily and I have yet to any two alike.  Makes it tough
on someone to act on these, especially when sent with a name.  When I click
on the address included in this message, someone else's name comes up (Steve
Beck).  I don't know who you are, what you want me to do, or if you even have
the right person.

ARSystem@ect.enron.com on 08/09/2000 09:33:29 AM
To: sally.beck@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Request Submitted: Access Request for mog.heu@enron.com

Please review and act upon this request. You have received this email because
you are listed as a data approver. Please click
http://itcApps.corp.enron.com/srrs/Approve/Detail.asp?ID=000000000001337&Email
=sally.beck@enron.com to approve the request.

Request ID          : 000000000001337
Request Create Date : 8/9/00 9:31:53 AM
Requested For       : mog.heu@enron.com
Resource Name       : EOL US Risk Management Application Product Data Manager
Resource Type       : Applications


Marie,

Please fax the ISDA documents to Steve Lins, city attorney, city of glendale, fax # 818-547-3402.

Thanks,

Kim Ward


Start Date: 1/24/02; HourAhead hour: 20;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002012420.txt


Greg:

It looks like Melba sent you an example of a put.  There is nowhere else on
the website to explain the different calculations so they use the identical
Long Description except for that one clause to differentiate between puts and
calls.  So far there have not been any collars, straddles, etc. offered.

On the second change, it looked to me like the preceding sentence already
covers the treatment of holidays:

...at the end of such day (normally being 4:05 p.m. (MPT)) on EnronOnline (or
for Saturdays, Sundays and statutory holidays, at the end of the day on the
preceding business day)...

which makes the deleted language redundant.

	Greg Johnston
	03/12/2001 11:30 AM

		 To: Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT, Lon Draper/CAL/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Option Language

Melba, I have reviewed the proposed changes and I do not believe that they
should be made.  The change to the calculation of the Cash Settlement Amount
to specify it is the Strike Price minus the Index doesn't work unless the
option is a put.  We want this long description to work for all options
(puts, calls, collars, etc.) and for each of those the calculation of the
Cash Settlement Amount is different.  That is the reason that we originally
put in the generic language that the Cash Settlement Amount is "the greater
of zero or the amount calculated as set forth on the Website", such that the
actual calculation mechanism for the Cash Settlement Amount will be set forth
in each specific product.  Therefore, I would suggest we change it back to
the original wording.

On the second change, I know that the wording that was removed is important
to our traders.  If the description is silent on holiday pricing (which will
be the case if we make the suggested change), I am not sure as to what the
default is.  We need to make sure that the default where the pricing for
holidays is not specified is exactly the same as the wording removed,
otherwise the wording removed needs to be put back in.  I am also not clear
on why we would remove the wording in the first place and create any
uncertainty as to holiday pricing.

Thanks
Greg

To: Greg Johnston/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc: Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT, Lon Draper/CAL/ECT@ECT
Subject: Option Language

Greg,

Attached please find the language for the Option products.  I need final
approval from you. Changes were suggested by Mark Taylor.

Thansk,

Melba


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 12/27/99 01:54
PM ---------------------------

Joe Belford
12/27/99 01:47 PM
To: Imelda Frayre/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris
Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Oliver/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Midcoast Interstate Transmission Curves

Imelda-
Please map the Midcoast Interstate Transmission trades to the following
curves asap:

For receipts - Tenn Z1/CG
For deliveries - IF - Midcoast - IT
For midmarket - Tenn Z1

If you have any questions or problems, please respond.
Thanks-
Joe


Steve:
It has come to my attention that we made need another agreement similar to
the one that we did with the ANNEX A form to cover the GTC's that Puget is
bound by when it trades online with us.  I have enclosed the online GTC.  It
is very similar to Annex A but I think that we need to deal with it
separately.  Let me know what you think.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


Thursday morning, May 17, 2001

COMMENT: I believe the Fed made a mistake on Tuesday. The 50-basis-point cut
in the federal funds rate was not necessary at this time. That was the
message from the bond market (rising yields), the yield curve (steepening
slope), and the stock market (rebounding prices) following the previous rate
cut on April 18. More recently, the rising prices of gold and gold stocks
also confirm the growing market consensus that the Fed may be easing too
much. The rapid growth in M2 also suggests that the Fed has done enough to
revive economic growth later this year, and may now be overshooting on the
easing side.

My main issue with the Fed's latest move isn't the rate cut itself, but
rather the press release that explained the reasons for the action. It was
almost a carbon copy of the statement issued by the Fed following the
previous rate cut on April 18. The message is that the economic risks are
still on the downside and that monetary policy is still biased to ease. In
my opinion, the message should have observed that the federal funds rate has
been cut five times in five months by 250 basis points to 4%, and that this
might be enough for now. The message should have been biased toward a
neutral monetary policy stance.

In my comment this past Sunday, I wrote, "Now, the Fed is providing easy
money to minimize the pain resulting from the bursting of Bubble I, which
seems to be setting the stage for Bubble II." Stock investors agreed with
this conclusion on Wednesday, a day after the Fed folks cut the federal
funds rate yet again. They understand that the Fed's rush to ease credit
conditions may not revive economic growth as quickly as the monetary
authorities would like. Instead, the resulting flood of liquidity is likely
to pour into the stock market.

Indeed, both the April 18 and May 15 statements clearly implied that Fed
Chairman Alan Greenspan and his colleagues now want to promote a positive
wealth effect in the stock market to boost consumer spending. This is quite
a reversal from early last year, when the Fed Chairman worried that the
soaring stock market was pushing consumer demand above available supply.

Here is the relevant excerpt from the May 15 statement: "The erosion in
current and prospective profitability, in combination with considerable
uncertainty about the business outlook, seems likely to hold down capital
spending going forward. This potential restraint, together with the possible
effects of earlier reductions in equity wealth on consumption and the risk
of slower growth abroad, continues to weigh on the economy."

Here is the relevant excerpt from the April 18 statement: "Nonetheless,
capital investment has continued to soften and the persistent erosion in
current and expected profitability, in combination with rising uncertainty
about the business outlook, seems poised to dampen capital spending going
forward. This potential restraint, together with the possible effects of
earlier reductions in equity wealth on consumption and the risk of slower
growth abroad, threatens to keep the pace of economic activity unacceptably
weak."

The message is loud and clear: The Fed folks believe that the negative
equity wealth effect they helped to engineer over the past year has gone too
far. A rebound in stock prices is now welcome. The Fed's welcome wagon is
stocked with lots of bottles of champagne, and the speculators are drinking
the liquidity with gusto. The bubbly is bringing back irrational exuberance
fast. (For a complete history of the Fed's policy statements see
http://www.yardeni.com/FOMC.asp.)

As I stated in my Sunday comment, I like bubbles. You can make lots of money
very quickly when a bubble is inflating, as long as you get out just before
it bursts. As of yesterdays close, the S&P 500 was 25% overvalued based on
the Fed's Stock Valuation Model (FSVM). Five more percentage points and the
market will be as overvalued as it was just before the 1987 crash, though it
would still be cheaper than at the start of last year when it was 70%
overvalued. But that was Bubble I. Bubble II may surpass the 1987
overvaluation, but I suspect it will burst somewhere below the 70% level.

My asset allocation model, which is based on the FSVM, suggests that the
right stocks/bonds mix whenever the market is more than 20% overvalued is a
very conservative 60/40. (The recommended mix is 70/30 whenever the market
is 10% to 20% overvalued.) For the past few weeks, I have hesitated to lower
my stocks/bonds recommended mix from 80/20 because the Fed's liquidity party
is likely to drive stock prices up further. In addition, the sober bond
vigilantes are back trying to offset the Fed's easing policy by pushing
yields up. (For a weekly update of the FSVM, see
http://www.yardeni.com/public/stkvalu.pdf.)

If the 30-year Treasury yield rises closer to 6.5% and stocks become more
than 30% overvalued, which seems increasingly likely over the next few
months, then I may go to 70/30. If I think we are close to bursting Bubble
II, I'll suggest 60/40.

The Fed is certainly our friend. However, true friends don't let their
friends drink and drive. I would prefer an earnings-driven bull market
rather than a liquidity-driven one. For now: May the bubble be with you!

NEW ON SITE: For those of you, who still care about fundamental analysis,
please have a look at our new, improved EARNINGS MONTH with "Squiggles
Inside!" This publication includes our unique Earnings Squiggles analysis
for all eleven sectors of the S&P 500 and now 49 selected industries. You'll
find that P/Es are quite high and that earnings prospects are subdued in
many industries, especially Technology and Consumer Staples.
(http://www.yardeni.com/public/em_010516.pdf)

In the latest EARNINGS WEEK, Joe Abbott and I examine and compare the latest
earnings expectations for the S&P large, mid, and small cap sectors. Here is
one of our findings: "All three S&P market cap groups are expected to record
a decline in Q2 earnings. Although Q2 earnings had been expected to decline
for the S&P 500 since the beginning of the year, it was only in the past
month that S&P Mid Cap 400 and S&P Small Cap 600 expectations fell into
negative territory."

The KEY WEEKLY drop-down box on the HOME page now includes charts on
Earnings and Valuation. The FED WATCHER has been expanded. Debbie Johnson's
StrategyFax is better than ever with instant analyses of the latest industry
developments. (Ask your DBAB sales rep to receive this by fax or email.)

Dr Ed

********************
1) You can now automatically add/delete this update and other products. Just
click on Fido (the dog) at the top of any page on the site OR review your
yardeni.com account at http://www.yardeni.com/customers/info2.asp OR send a
message to support@yardeni.com.
2) Subscriber-level access:
http://www.yardeni.com/yardeni1/userAuth2/idpass.htm
********************
Home: http://www.yardeni.com
Global Portfolio Strategy: http://www.yardeni.com/weain.asp
Earnings Week & Month: http://www.yardeni.com/stocklab.asp#earnings
Weekly Audio Forum: http://www.yardeni.com/waf.asp
Global Economic Indicators: http://www.yardeni.com/ecindin.asp
Stock Lab: http://www.yardeni.com/stocklab.asp
Stock Market Indicators: http://www.yardeni.com/stockindicators.asp
Interactive Stock Price Derby: http://www.yardeni.com/stockderby.asp
E-conomy Center: http://www.yardeni.com/cyber.asp
New Economy Center: http://www.yardeni.com/neweco.asp
Greenspan Center: http://www.yardeni.com/greenspan.asp
People Polls: http://www.peoplepolls.com/
Multi-Lingual: http://www.yardeni.com/#languages
Mega Trades: http://www.yardeni.com/megatrades.asp
**********************************************
VIRUS ALERT: No attachments sent with this message.
**********************************************
The information and opinions in this report were prepared by Deutsche Bank
or one of its affiliates (collectively "Deutsche Bank"). This report is
based upon information available to the public. The information herein is
believed by Deutsche Bank to be reliable and has been obtained from sources
believed to be reliable, but Deutsche Bank makes no representation as to the
accuracy of completeness of such information. Deutsche Bank and/or its
affiliates worldwide may be market makers or specialists in, act as advisers
or lenders to, have positions in and effect transactions in securities of
companies mentioned herein and also may provide, may have provided, or may
seek to provide investment banking services for those companies. In
addition, Deutsche Bank and/or its affiliates or their respective officers,
directors and employees hold or may hold long or short positions in the
securities, options thereon or other related financial products of companies
discussed herein. Opinions, estimates and projections in this report
constitute Deutsche Bank's judgment and are subject to change without
notice. Prices and availability of financial instruments also are subject to
change without notice. This report is provided for informational purposes
only. It is not to be construed as an offer to buy or sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy or sell any financial instruments or to participate in
any particular trading strategy in any jurisdiction in which such an offer
or solicitation would violate applicable laws or regulations. The financial
instruments discussed in this report may not be suitable for all investors
and investors must make their own investment decisions using their own
independent advisors as they believe necessary and based upon their specific
financial situations and investment objectives. If a financial instrument is
denominated in a currency other than an investor's currency, a change in
exchange rates may adversely affect the price or value of, or the income
derived from, the financial instrument, and such investor effectively
assumes currency risk. In addition, income from an investment may fluctuate
and the price or value of financial instruments described in this report,
either directly or indirectly, may rise or fall. Furthermore, past
performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. Unless
governing law permits otherwise, all transactions should be executed through
the Deutsche Bank entity in the investor's home jurisdiction. In the U.S.
this report is approved and/or distributed by Deutsche Banc Alex. Brown
Inc., a member of the NYSE, the NASD and SIPC. In the United Kingdom this
report is approved and/or distributed by Deutsche Bank AG, which is
regulated by The Securities and Futures Authority (the "SFA"), is not for
distribution to private customers (as that term is defined under the rules
of the SFA) and no financial instruments referred to herein will be made
available to any such private customer. In jurisdictions other than the U.S.
and the U.K. this report is distributed by the Deutsche Bank affiliate in
the investor's jurisdiction, and interested parties are advised to contact
the Deutsche Bank office with which they currently deal. Additional
information relative to securities, other financial products or issuers
discussed in this report is available upon request. No part of this material
may be copied or duplicated in any form or by any means, or redistributed,
without Deutsche Bank's prior written consent. Copyright 2001 Deutsche Banc
Alex. Brown Inc., all rights reserved.


Hey, time to join the fun at FERC!!!

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 07/26/2001 09:42 AM -----

	Rebecca W Cantrell/ENRON@enronXgate 07/26/2001 08:08 AM 	   To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Ray Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON  cc:   Subject: Transwestern Hearing

Here's a little more detail on the issues that FERC wants to explore with regard to the Transwestern negotiated deals:

NGI's Daily Gas Price Index
published : July 26, 2001
FERC Targets Transwestern for Market-Power Hearing
FERC called for a hearing to determine whether Transwestern Pipeline exercised market power when it awarded negotiated-rate contracts that led to shippers being charged up to $27/MMBtu last February, when the firm transportation rate to the California border was only 38 cents/MMBtu.
That was "70 times the recourse rate," said Commissioner Linda Breathitt, who called the matter up for discussion at the Commission's regular meeting. "Thirty-eight cents versus $27, that's a big difference in prices and we ought to be looking at that," responded Commissioner William Massey.
"...[W]e believe closer scrutiny of transactions that provide the opportunity to impose rates many multiples in excess of maximum approved tariff rates is necessary, especially in light of our serious concern regarding the high prices for natural gas in California relative to prices in the rest of the country and their consequential effect on wholesale electricity prices in California," the order noted [RP97-288-009].
FERC's action was in response to a show cause order it issued in March, directing Transwestern to explain how it had firm capacity available on its pipeline to move gas under the negotiated-rate transactions, and why its actions in entering into the negotiated-rate agreements didn't violate Commission regulations and policy regarding firm transportation service and negotiated-rate agreements.
FERC's order requires Transwestern to make certain changes to the posting of daily capacity. "I'm satisfied that this should take care of the issue prospectively," Breathitt said. But with respect to the negotiated agreements, "our order today establishes a hearing of limited scope on a fast-track basis to determine whether Transwestern exercised market power in awarding these...contracts."
It directs an administrative law judge to convene a pre-hearing conference within 10 days, and issue an initial decision on the matter within 60 days. The hearing will focus on three issues: 1) whether Transwestern capacity was advertised and awarded in a fair manner; 2) whether the rates negotiated were the result of the exercise of market power; and 3) why the capacity awarded was available without interruption while recourse service was not available. "In addition, I have a question [as to] why shippers agreed to such rates when much lower recourse rates should have been available under our negotiated rate program," Breathitt said.
The shippers that entered into the negotiated-rate transactions with Transwestern include Richardson Products Co., Sempra Energy Trading Corp., BP Energy Co., Astra Power LLC and Reliant Energy Services.


GCP adjustments highlighted in red.

Rgds.

Samuel x3-9890
(GCP_Enron Networks)

From: Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/13/2001 05:13 PM
To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/ENRON@enronXgate,
Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Cynthia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, Enron Europe
Global Contracts and Facilities@ENRON, Enron Europe Global
CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juana
Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT,
Karen O'Day/NA/Enron@Enron, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Kelly
Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian Lindsay/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, EOL Call Center@ENRON, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D
Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Amy Heffernan/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Molly LaFuze/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Danny Clark/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
cc:
Subject: EOL approvals, 03-13-01

Please see attached.


I know that it's in the IT department and that's it :o)

Everything is going okay, thanks so much for asking. It is definitely a lot
of work, one thing after another. I'm glad to know that Jordan is excited
:o).

We love going to good 'ole' Chuckie, you see I said we because I LOVE their
pizza. The children really have a good time there too plus it wears them
out!

I ain't mad at the little boys Kenneth Coles because I sure do love their
shoes..... ha! I know that moma Thurston don't play that nonsense when it
comes down to service. People are just getting besides themselves these
days. I almost went off in Olive Garden yesterday because of poor
management service but my girlfriend didn't want me too. I am so mad at for
wanting to SET IT OFF, you are too kicks (Louisiana talk o:))

My weekend was okay. I picked up some cake tasters that this one bakery we
have in mind baked for us. They gave us 4 samples, I chose Italian Creme,
Carrot Cake, Amoretto White and Mark chose a Chocolate Fudge and they were
good except for I don't eat chocolate cake. I pick up another sample cake
on tomorrow and then one more probably this weekend. Saturday I was with
Danny most of the day and that was it.

                    Patrice.L.Mims
                    @enron.com            To:     hope-frelix@reliantenergy.com
                                          cc:
                    10/15/01 01:29        Subject:     RE: Your dress :o)
                    PM

Girl, what is PMO?  I'm doing fine, I just sent Tarsha an e-mail, and I hit
the send button and there you are!  Is everything going as planned in all
of your wedding preparations?  I certainly hope so.  I know planning a
wedding is alot of work.  Jordan is still excited about walking with
Taylor.

I had a good time with my boys this weekend.  They are crazy.  We went to
the dreaded "Chuckee Cheese" this weekend and oh boy, was I ever glad to
get out of there.  After that, we went  to the Galleria, because when I was
there before without them, I saw a shoe store that had really cute,
fashionable shoes for little boys.  What I didn't realize was that they
were designer shoes.  Who ever heard of Kenneth Cole shoes for little boys.
$65 a pair for the kind that I liked.  But since I was there, I said, what
the heck?  After about 20 minutes, we had been waited on, but still neither
one of my boys had even tried on a pair of shoes yet, let alone buying a
pair (the sales folks were truly taking their sweet time).  I was pissed
and me and my possee (Jordan and Kendall) almost "set if off" at the
Galleria.  We just left after I told them that their service was
unacceptable.  Anyway, don't mess with Moma Thurston.

How was your weekend?

See ya!

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   hope-frelix@reliantenergy.com@ENRON
   Sent:   Monday, October 15, 2001 1:12 PM
   To:     Mims, Patrice L.
   Subject:  RE: Your dress :o)

   Hi Patrice:

   How are you today? I am wondering if you know who is over the PMO
   department over there at Enron. My cousin in Austin received a phone
   from
   them regarding employment and is curious about it.

   Regards,
   Hope

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Jeff,

The subtrans rate has no distribuiton in it (by definition) and T is small so
that rate is essentially the gen component for all the TOU rates.  Unless the
CPUC has reached new hights of insanity, the gen component shoudl be about
the same ($100/MWh) for all the retail rates shown.

Hope this is what you were after.

Alan


Approved.

---------------------- Forwarded by Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron on 12/13/2000
05:06 PM ---------------------------

Kathy Campos
12/13/2000 03:56 PM
To: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Expense Report

Rod,

Attached is my expense report, please review and approve.

Thanks.
Kathy


just some thoughts on what we might say in a letter if we have to send one by
the 4th.


Another person to keep a eye on.
White male 6 ft  165 lbs. light brown hair, not a bad looking person.
He came into my building while i was inside working and gave me the story
that he was looking for work. He had to walk through a closed gated to
get inside.
i raised a shovel and informed him that he was trespassing.
this was Sunday. i just saw him again at 1pm walking north on Taft.
In my opinion this guy is up to no good. Keep your eyes open.
Bob
On Tue, 11 Dec 2001 07:31:34 -0500 Carla Webbles <carla_J@compuserve.com>
writes:
>
>Howdy -
>
>The early morning news on Channel 11 reported the arrest of someone
>the
>cops called "The Montrose Burglar".  They said he may be responsible
>for as
>many as ten armed robberies and is being charged with three, and that
>armed
>with a pistol, he would hold up people leaving bars and clubs late at
>night.  The mug shot showed a middle aged black guy, balding.  He
>doesn't
>sound like either the Fargo Carjacker or the Fairview Minivan Mugger
>but
>maybe, knock on wood, this arrest will put a liitle dent in the crime
>stats.
>
>Carla
>
>------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>emca-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
>http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today!  For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
emca-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


What do you mean we're not working hard enough?

You're the one that is never in the office when I call.  Not to mention all
those stories Nicole told me about you partying it up in San Francisco.

You know what they say:  All play and no work out west makes the stock price
go south.

Andy


I think the meeting is on Wednesday, but if you can be there (Sacremento, I
expect) you should.  As I mentioned in my voicemail, I think the meeting will
not be particularly substantive;  more likely it is a photo op for the
governor to show how tough he is on the pirate generators.  Based on your
message below, should we still plan to send somebody?  I still think we
should if we can manage the legal risk.

Mike:  would you be able to attend as well?

From: Richard B Sanders@ECT on 05/06/2001 10:45 AM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Gray Davis meeting

As I indicated in my VM, I will be in LA early Tues morning. Would you like
to talk about the isuues before your meeting--or would you like me to go?
----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 05/06/2001 10:43 AM -----

	"Shohet, Jeff" <jshohet@graycary.com>
	05/04/2001 10:48 AM

		 To: "Doron Ezickson" <dezickson@mwe.com>, "Gary Fergus"
<gfergus@brobeck.com>, "Gerald L. McMahon" <mcmahon@scmv.com>, "James Ransom"
<james_ransom@la.kirkland.com>, "Jean Frizzell" <jfrizzell@gibbs-bruns.com>,
"Jeffrey Davidson" <jeffrey_davidson@la.kirkland.com>, "Jennifer A. Hein"
<jennifer.hein@neg.pge.com>, "Jennifer Costa" <jennifer.costa@neg.pge.com>,
"John Hershberger" <hershberger@scmv.com>, "Laura H. Roppe" <roppe@scmv.com>,
"Mary Lou Peters" <marylou.peters@msdw.com>, "Michael A. Leone"
<leone@scmv.com>, "Michael J. Weaver" <mike.weaver@lw.com>, "Michael L.
Kirby" <mlk@pkns.com>, "Mike D. Smith" <msmith1@enron.com>, "Richard B.
Sanders" <richard.b.sanders@enron.com>, "Robert Williams"
<robert.c.williams@enron.com>, "Robin Gibbs (Mr.)" <sbishop@gibbs-bruns.com>,
"Stephen A. Herman" <steve.herman@neg.pge.com>, "Sydne Michel"
<sydne_michel@la.kirkland.com>, "Tanya Murphy" <tanya.murphy@neg.pge.com>,
"Tony Richardson" <tony_richardson@la.kirkland.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Gray Davis meeting

Williams, Reliant, Enron, Duke, AES, Dynegy, Mirant and Sempra have been
invited to a meeting with the Governor.  The press release provides: "The
agenda will include "unpaid debts, credit and the supply of power."
Williams is concerned about attending such a meeting of competitors without
the presence of antitrust counsel even under the sponsorship of the Governor
(who presumably acts as both the sovereign and on behalf of the buyer(s)).
We are looking into the Sovereign immunity and Noerr-Pennington issues to
determine how best to protect any such group discussions from challenge or
as evidence in any of the pending cases.  Are any of your clients also
concerned about this and are you also looking into these issues?
Williams would like to have a joint defense protected conference call
(perhaps later today if possible) to discuss this meeting and consider
whether antitrust counsel is needed for the group or if each participant
should attend with its own counsel.  Please let me have your thoughts and
whether one of you (or other counsel) is interested and available to
participate in a conference call.  Thanks/

Jeffrey M. Shohet
Gray Cary Ware & Freidenrich
Phone: (619) 699-2743
Fax:     (619) 236-1048
Mobile: (619) 933-2743
email:    jshohet@GrayCary.com

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

[INFO] -- Content Manager:

NOTICE:  This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)
and may contain confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized
review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.  If you are not the
intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all
copies of the original message.

To contact our email administrator directly, send to postmaster@graycary.com

Thank you.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------


Paul,

Attached is the Reserve Report form 9/00 with a qualifier of rr900, a letter
explaning why production has dropped, a spreadsheet with updated production
vs. line pressures and a net back calculation sheet (utilized for wellhead
pricing) . As soon as I get the updated LOE's, I will send them to you.

Jim

Gerald, please see the pressure letter and graph.  For your information.

 - SA VPP GAS.exe
 - San Arroyo Pressure Letter.doc
 - Sa Production  Line Pressure  Graphs.xls
 - Netback calculation - Crescndo.xls


I just called Woodrow's again and some jerkoff said they would "try" to get
the game . . . I called SROs and the manager there said that he was
positive that they would have the game on tonite . . . so it's y'alls call

Regards,

Kevin A. Boone
Accenture--Houston
(Octel) 713.837.1638
(Client) 281.848.1619
(C) 713.306.7940
(H) 713.864.4149
Kevin.A.Boone@accenture.com

Our web address is http://www.accenture.com


thx

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"John B. Scott" <jscott@scottyung.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, November 08, 2001 1:15 PM
To:	Sanders, Richard B.
Subject:	Good luck

Richard-

Good luck on your company's adventure.  I  can't think of a better person to direct Enron's defense.  You will be  happy to know we turned down an untruthful proxy statement,  1933, and 1934 act  case.  (Actually, you probably wish a nit-wit like me got the  cases.)

John


PLEASE APPROVE HIM FOR THIS.  PHILLIP WILL NOT BE ABLE TO GET INTO HIS EMAIL
SYSTEM TO DO THIS.
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, OR PROBLEMS, PLEASE CALL ME AT  X3-7257.

THANK YOU.

INA.

IF THIS IS A PROBLEM TO DO IT THIS WAY PLEASE CALL ME AND I WILL WALK PHILLIP
THROUGH THE STEPS TO APPROVE.  IF YOU CALL HIM, HE WILL DIRECT IT TO ME
ANYWAY.

ARSystem@mailman.enron.com on 12/18/2000 07:07:04 PM
To: phillip.k.allen@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Your Approval is Overdue: Access Request for barry.tycholiz@enron.com

This request has been pending your approval for  5 days.  Please click
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000009659&Page=
Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000009659
Request Create Date : 12/8/00 8:23:47 AM
Requested For       : barry.tycholiz@enron.com
Resource Name       : VPN
Resource Type       : Applications


Dear Mr Kean,

I am writing to you following a suggestion from Edith Terry (in Enron's DC
office) that I introduce myself to you with respect to prospective
employment with Enron. I will be permanently relocating to the United States
just prior to my marriage in Michigan this July and am looking to continue
my career in the energy sector. In particular, I have a strong interest in
the energy revolution taking place in the US, both on the commercial and
regulatory side and I would enjoy working for organisations, such as Enron,
that are leading this revolution. Edith suggested that you may be in a good
position to suggest opportunities within Enron for which I may be suitable.

I am currently based in Tokyo as the Australian energy representative to the
Asia Pacific Energy Research Centre (APERC), where I have developed a strong
knowledge of the Asia Pacific energy market. In this position I have been
closely involved in the development of the APEC Energy Demand and Supply
Outlook, as well as ongoing research in the fields of energy efficiency,
natural gas development and energy pricing. Moreover, as part of my work
with APERC I have maintained a close contact with APEC Energy Working Group
activities, including the APEC Energy Business Network.

Prior to my appointment at APERC, I worked at the Australian Bureau of
Agricultural and Resource Economics (ABARE) in Canberra. During my term at
ABARE, I was closely involved in the development of the economic research
underlying Australia's position for the Kyoto climate change conference, and
also in the analysis of APEC (Asia Pacific) energy markets.

For you information, I have enclosed a brief resume which summarises my
background qualifications and experience.
Knowing that you have a busy schedule I would be most grateful for any
advice or assistance you are able to offer.

Yours sincerely,

Alastair L. Stevenson
Energy Economist (Australia)
Asia Pacific Energy Research Centre (APERC)

encl.

 - Alastair Stevenson Resume.PDF


I believe the answer is no, just one, but wanted to check with you first. Let
me know how to reply. Thanks. Per
---------------------- Forwarded by Per Sekse/NY/ECT on 08/14/2000 04:16 PM
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Hotra, Jason" <hotraj@hmc.harvard.edu>
08/14/2000 10:23 AM

To: "Per Sekse (E-mail)" <per.sekse@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Enron entities

Per--

Are there multiple legal entities within Enron that we would be trading
with, such that we would need to set up multiple copies of the ISDA?

Jason


The STCA desk will be short 75 MW on peak at NP-15 on 1/4. This is due to two
sales involving the STNW desk and one involving LTWM which have been zeroed
out in scheduling but not in EnPower. All three are for 25 MW on peak.

Thanks,
Kate


JULY 3             TECO TAP             10.000/ ENRON ;   65.000/ HPL IFERC

                      LS HPL KATY              30.000/ ENRON

JULY 4          TECO TAP              35.000/ HPL IFERC

                     LS HPL KATY              30.000/ ENRON


Attached are the articles that were a part of the Wall Street Journals week
long series on electricity deregulation called Power Cuts.


Cara, I hope you surgery goes well.  Very good memo on keeping the team and management
	informed.  Keep up the good work.  Thanks. Lynn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Vaughan, Cara
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 10:09 AM
To:	Blair, Lynn; Buchanan, John; Zadow, Raetta; Berger, Larry
Cc:	Kowalke, Terry; Adams, Jean; Benningfield, Robert; Forbish, Sherry; Greaney, Chris; Hibbard, Scott; Janzen, Randy; Linhart, Joe; McDaniel, Janet; Scurlock, Debra; Sturr, Kathy; Vaughan, Cara; Woodson, Harry
Subject:	Cara out 11/14-15 info about PHPL

I will be out Thursday and Friday for oral surgery. I should be back on Monday assuming that everything goes well.  Wednesday I will be training at night with Jean.

Panhandle has requested payback gas and Kay has approved it. Thursday and Friday Panhandle will receive 10,000 a day. Randy and I I nomed and confirmed the gas on our system for those two days. They want the payback to continue.  Scott has agreed to cover Panhandle and watch the payback.

Debra will cover any MOPS activity.

Thank you,

Cara Vaughan


Dear Ms. Fischer,

Thank you for the opportunity to interview with you for the tax accounting
position on Friday, October 26.  I appreciate your consideration and
enjoyed meeting you and members of Enron staff.

The interview convinced me of how compatible my background and
skills are with the goals of Enron. I want to reiterate my strong
interest in working for you.

I look forward to meeting you again.

Sincerely,

Molly Helton


I know you don't believe this but I am working on a notional offer.

Michael H Garred@EES
11/22/2000 09:43 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Tetco M2

Chris,

I'm looking for gas delivered to two Tetco M2 interconnects with TCo.

At the minimum, I'm looking for an offer for a flat baseload volume for
December flow.  My preference is to get an offer for a flat baseload volume
from December through March.  The points and volumes are:
 Delmont {Volume:  3,712/day}
 Windrifge {Volume:  2,859/day}

Can I get a nymex plus offer?

Thanks.

mhg


Richard - in case you have not seen this:  CalPX's Answer in the FERC
proceeding, which includes agreement to standstill pending resolution of
Complaint.
Received: from bracepatt.com (mail.bracepatt.com [205.138.132.1]) by
mail.qeuo.com; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:56:35 -0800
Received: from HOUSTON-Message_Server by bracepatt.com with Novell_GroupWise;
Mon, 12 Feb 2001 12:57:43 -0600
Message-Id: <sa87ddc7.070@bracepatt.com>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 5.5.4.1
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 12:57:17 -0600
From: "Ronald Carroll" <rcarroll@bracepatt.com>
To: "Andrea Settanni" <asettanni@bracepatt.com>, "Paul Fox"
<pfox@bracepatt.com>, "Tracey Bradley" <tbradley@bracepatt.com>,
<gfergus@brobeck.com>,<mary.hain@enron.com>, <rsanders@enron.com>,
<hao@quinnemanuel.com>
Subject: Fwd: California Power Exchange Corp.'s Answer to Complaint
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_DF846037.C7A6CEAA"

I've attached the PX's Answer to our complaint which I have just received.
Received: from mcafee.bracepatt.com by bracepatt.com; Mon, 12 Feb 2001
12:52:41 -0600
Received: FROM smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net BY mcafee.bracepatt.com ; Mon Feb 12
13:01:47 2001 -0600
X-Proxy: keymaster.bracepatt.com protected
Received: from 207-172-146-79.s79.tnt3.ann.va.dialup.rcn.com
([207.172.146.79] helo=brudergentile.com) by smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net with
esmtp (Exim 3.16 #5) id 14SO3b-000792-00 ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 13:50:40 -0500
Message-ID: <3A88304A.569D7C5C@brudergentile.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 13:49:46 -0500
From: "James H. McGrew" <jhmcgrew@brudergentile.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Robert Reilley <rreilley@coral-energy.com>,  "Jeffrey D. Watkiss"
<dwatkiss@bracepatt.com>,  Mary Hain <mhain@ect.enron.com>,  Ronald Carroll
<rcarroll@bracepatt.com>,  Susan Mara <smara@enron.com>, Sarah Novosel
<snovosel@enron.com>,  Timothy Bolden <Timothy.Bolden@pinnaclewest.com>,
John McGrane <jmcgrane@morganlewis.com>,  Phillip Fantle
<phillip_fantle@cargill.com>,  Michael Griffen <mgriffen@morganlewis.com>,
Don Garber <dgarber@sempra.com>, Brian Currey <bcurrey@omm.com>,  John
Stamper <jstamper@omm.com>,  Dennis Vermillion
<dvermillion@avistaenergy.com>,  Gary Bachman <gdb@vnf.com>, Howard Shapiro
<hes@vnf.com>,  Cheryl Feik Ryan <cfr@vnf.com>,  Robert Loeffler
<rloeffler@mofo.com>,  Katherine Zeitlin <kzeitlin@mofo.com>,  Richard
Beitler <rbeitler@sempratrading.com>,  Julia Richardson <jrr@vnf.com>,
Melvin Brosterman <mbrosterman@stroock.com>,  Alan Yudkowsky
<ayudkowsky@stroock.com>,  John Fryer <john.fryer@pacificorp.com>,  Richard
Josephson <rcjosephson@stoel.com>,  Per Ramfjord <paramfjord@stoel.com>,
Scott Kaplan <sjkaplan@stoel.com>,  David Perlman <dmperlman@powersrc.com>,
Randal Osteen <rosteen@powersrc.com>,  Edward Berlin <EBerlin@swidlaw.com>,
Sean Atkins <saatkins@swidlaw.com>,  Julia Moore <JuliaMoore@swidlaw.com>
Subject: California Power Exchange Corp.'s Answer to Complaint
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------47F528D2F7E77548F9813555"

This message and any attachment(s) hereto are intended solely for the
individual(s) listed in the masthead.? This message may contain information
that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure.? Any
review, dissemination or use of this message or its contents by persons other
than the addressee(s) is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.? If you
have received this message in error, please notify the sender by return
e-mail and delete the message from your system.? Thank you!

This is being filed at FERC today.

Jim McGrew ? ?
 - BLF0078.DOC


For the culture committee: What has this got ot do with Enron ? Anybody who shows up is clearly not busy enough.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Enron Announcements/Corp/Enron@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Enron+20Announcements_Corp_Enron+40ENRON@ENRON.com]  On Behalf Of Enron Federal Credit Union@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, September 05, 2001 5:25 PM
To:	All Enron Houston@ENRON
Subject:	On-Line Stock Trading Brown Bag

Interested in learning more about
the fun and convenience of
on-line stock trading?

Join EFCU for our
On-Line Stock Trading Brown Bag.

WHO:  Joel Spry of Star Financial Network
will discuss the basics of on-line trading
and EFCU's trading program.

WHEN:  Friday, September 14, 2001
11:30 - 12:30

WHERE:  EB 5C2

RSVP:  joy.wagman@enron.com

Refreshments will be provided.

<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>


Chris,

This spread sheet contains the new WIC meters, as discussed.  I also
discovered that there are about 200 meters we current get manually for CIG
that also need to be added to the database.  They are included in the
attached file on separate sheets.  Meters already existing in the database
are not included for either pipe.  Can you please dump these into the
database and set up additional sheets in the Socal manual entry spreadsheet
for these meters.  Let me know if you have any questions.  Thanks.

Mat


COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION CORPORATION
                        NOTICE TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES
                                OCTOBER 18, 2001

Notice ID: 3195
5 - NO RESPONSE REQUIRED

SUBJECT: CAPACITY ALLOCATION-TIMELY NOMINATION CYCLE FOR OCTOBER 19, 2001

PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL ALLOCATIONS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON THE RECEIPT OF
ANY NEW NOMINATIONS OR INTRADAY NOMINATIONS.

Excess MDWQ               Available +
ISS Withdrawals           Available
SIT Withdrawals           Available
Imbalance Drawdowns       Available

Excess MDIQ               Not Available +
ISS Injections            Not Available
SIT Injections            Not Available
Imbalance Paybacks        Not Available

PAL Lends/Unparks         Available
PAL Parks/Loan Paybacks   Not Available

+ Call Gas Control 24 hours in advance at (304) 357-2606 to request approval.

Columbia Gas Transmission has completed allocating all of its receipt and
delivery points for the gas day of October 19, 2001.  You may now view the
quantities you are authorized to flow on October 19, 2001.  On the Internet
NAVIGATOR, view Nominations, Scheduled Quantity, Scheduled Quantity for Service
Requestor-Summary, Nominations to be Viewed, and select Reduced Nominations.
The quantities confirmed to flow for your account are available on the Internet
NAVIGATOR after 5:30 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, October 18, 2001.

If you have any questions, please contact your Account Representative.


Dan:  We have discussed this internally and will remain with the numbers
provided in my e-mail to you on 03/05.  Our feeling is that until the sampling
equipment is up and running at the terminal we have to stick to a know number
as
a bench mark, that being the first delivery of Matthew.
Brgds'
Joe

Dan.Masters@enron.com on 03/05/2001 03:34:57 PM

To:   Joseph McKechnie/Cabot LNG@Cabot LNG
cc:   Christopher Skinner/Cabot LNG@Cabot LNG, Jaime.Sanabria@enron.com,
      Paul.Y'Barbo@enron.com, Todd.Peterson@enron.com, Rudy Adamiak/Cabot
      LNG@Cabot LNG, Jane Michalek/Cabot LNG@Cabot LNG
Fax to:
Subject:  Re: Feb 12 delivery of "Methane Arctic"

Joe-
It would have been preferable to work these numbers out in advance rather
than after the fact, especially considering that it seems we already had by
our phone conversations and my email to you dated February 7.  Since we
received no correspondence to the contrary, I assumed the numbers to be
used would be per that email.  Please revert with your response.

Dan

"Joseph McKechnie" <jmckechnie@cabotlng.com> on 03/05/2001 08:22:30 AM

To:   Dan.Masters@enron.com
cc:   "Christopher Skinner" <cskinner@cabotlng.com>,
      Jaime.Sanabria@enron.com, Paul.Y'Barbo@enron.com,
      Todd.Peterson@enron.com, "Rudy Adamiak" <radamiak@cabotlng.com>,
      "Jane Michalek" <jmichalek@cabotlng.com>
Subject:  Re: Feb 12 delivery of "Methane Arctic"

Dan:  We have rechecked our numbers and offer the following.  Based on The
Matthew's original delivery to Eco in July 2000 she delivered 2,744.094
mmbtu's.
This is the base number we are working with.  The Arctic delivered
1,415,921
mmbtu's 5/6 feb 2001, She then delivered 1,389,086 mmbtus on the 12/13th of
feb
2001, for a total of 2,805,007 mmbtus delivered.  We subtract 2,744,094
(matthew
base number) from 2,805,007 and get 60,913 mmbtus remaining, which we will
bill
at the $3.483097 rate.
We will be re-submitting the invoice upon receipt of you comments

Brgds
Joe McKechnie

Dan.Masters@enron.com on 02/27/2001 09:18:11 PM

To:   Joseph McKechnie/Cabot LNG@Cabot LNG, Christopher Skinner/Cabot
LNG@Cabot
      LNG
cc:   Jaime.Sanabria@enron.com, Paul.Y'Barbo@enron.com,
Todd.Peterson@enron.com
Fax to:
Subject:  Re: Feb 12 delivery of "Methane Arctic"

Joe/Chris-
I have received your invoice for the Feb 13 delivery of the "Methane
Arctic".  I do not agree with the split as it appears on the invoice.  For
the Winter Cargo portion billed at $4.323264, there should be 55,924.321m
(superscript: 3) which corresponds to 1,252,745 MMBtu.  The remainder to be
billed at $3.483097 is 6,086.467m(superscript: 3) which corresponds to
136,341 MMBtu.  Please recheck your figures and revert.

Thank you,
Dan Masters

Dan Masters
02/07/2001 04:07 PM

To:   jmckechnie@cabotlng.com
cc:
Subject:  Feb 12 delivery of "Methane Arctic"

Joe-
Confirming our conversation, since the "Winter Cargo" is being delivered on
two Methane Arctics, we need to paper split the volumes on the 2nd one
between the winter cargo price and normal price.  Using the volumes for a
standard cargo from the contract, the winter cargo should be 119,000 m
(superscript: 3).  The delivery that just finished was 63,075.679 m
(superscript: 3).  That leaves 55,924.321m(superscript: 3) on the next
delivery to be priced at the winter cargo rate and the remainder to be
priced at the normal rate.

Thanks,
Dan Masters
Office:   713-345-5498
Fax: 713-646-6560
Cell:     832-326-9590
Email:    dan.masters@enron.com

(See attached file: att1.eml)

 - att1.eml
 - att2.eml


Mike,

Based on the screen today and current spreads, we may be able to market the
excess volumes (in the Waha region) at the following levels for 2001:

Jan 4.65
Feb 4.47
Mar 4.26
Apr 4.04
May 3.97
Jun 3.96
Jul 3.96
Aug 3.95
Sep 3.84
Oct 3.96
Nov 4.06
Dec 4.17

Of course, these are only forecasts and are very volatile.  If you need
anything else, or have any questions, let me know.

Daren

Mike Mazowita@ENRON
10/25/2000 11:36 AM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Cleburne-Tenaska IV Plant

Daren,

I'm trying to put together the 2001 Operating Budget for the plant.  I need a
conservative forecast, per month, of the price that could be obtained by
selling our excess volumes.

Thanks.


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 01/18/2001 12:39 PM -----

	Stephen Dowd@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
	01/16/2001 12:12 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@ENRON, Edward Ondarza/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Stewart Seeligson/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: Turner/CNN

Gentlemen

I just got off the phone with David Stark who wanted to better understand the
thinking behind Enron's preference for a smaller marketing deal rather than
the full sponsorship that Uva and Stark pitched last week.  I reiterated to
him that we would not normally entertain such a large deal without a
significant commercial transaction (or series of transactions) and that the
size of the opportunity set currently in front of us only justified
discussing the smaller marketing deal as indicated in Steve's email.  Stark
pressed to know what value we wanted to see in the set of AOL/TWX/Turner/CNN
deals that are underway currently.  He was clear in stating that if we had a
number in mind, he could push other parts of the organization to direct
business our way sufficient to meet our needs to justify a larger
sponsorship.  I declined to give him a value, but I think we should discuss
this in some detail.

I'll get in touch to set something up.

Stephen Dowd
Enron Broadband Services
(713)345-7219 - Office
(713)858-8867 - Mobile


>FYI.  Please keep confidential.  John White's trying to go after the contracts.  Hap Boyd, who's on his Board, is opposing John's action and asking him not to go forward.  Too bad.  He was ready to launch.  Not sure what Hap's sensitivities are.  John's asked me not to intervene at this point.

Best,
Jeff
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hap.Boyd@enron.com [mailto:Hap.Boyd@enron.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 10:12 AM
> To: Rachel McMahon
> Cc: Cavanagh, Ralph; steve_ponder@fpl.com; jweisgall@aol.com;
> joer@calpine.com
> Subject: Re: for Board review and comment
>
>
>
> John,
> As you know I do not favor attacking the DWR contracts. I don't want our
> company name associated with such an attack. The companies that
> negotiated
> the contracts did so in good faith at a time when prices were high and
> expected to continue so. We have defended contract sanctity in the past
> and
> should continue to do so. If copanies want to voluntarily renegotiate,
> that
> is up to them and DWR. I intend to stay out of it and would urge CEERT
> to
> do the same.
> Hap
>
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
> and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
> the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
> (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender
> or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
> delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
> hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not
> create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron
> Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other
> party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by
> estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
> **********************************************************************


Vince,

I have written a paper, which supposedly is going to be published in the
February 2000 issue of EPRM, probably after some editorial cuts (at least
this is what I am being told by them).  I would appreciate your thoughts if
you would have time to read it.

Regards,
Martin

 - Userconf.doc


Just an update that there are new MP3s available for download at <http://www.24bom.com> - click on the listen link.  These were recorded on Jan 17th at the Medicine Hat Gallery.  Speaking of the Medicine Hat, the boys will be there next week !!!  That's right, after you listen to those MP3s come on down Thursday February 7th and watch'em do it all over again.

Thanks for listening-

24BOM!

You either added yourself to this mailing list or were added by someone who love's you.. If a mistake was made please feel free to take yourself off of our mailing list by emailing unsubscribe@24bom.com <mailto:unsubscribe@24bom.com> .  You will automatically be removed from the mailing list.


FYI.
---------------------- Forwarded by Brian Perrone/CES/ColumbiaGas on
02/10/2000
02:51 PM ---------------------------
   Kara Destephanis                02/10/2000 02:50 PM

To: Joann_Collins@enron.com, joan.veselack@enron.com
cc: Noel Bartlo/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Brian
Perrone/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
Subject: Cut Gas 1/26

I just found out through COH reports that 500 dth delivered to mkt 5-7 via
K38094 (First Energy) did not show up on the 26th of January.

As a result of this and other factors, a total delivery volume to that agg
pool
went from the 484 dth requested amount to 217 dth.  This was during the OFO
period.  Not sure how we are going to handle the resulting penalties, but just
wanted to make sure that Enron does not pay First Energy for those volumes.
Sorry I was not notified of this cut sooner.

Please let me know if ?s

Kara


****************************************************************
EARN MORE THAN MANY BANK CHECKING ACCOUNTS
WITH DIRECT DEPOSIT AT SCHWAB!
****************************************************************

Dear Schwab Signature Services(TM) Client,

Because you're a valued client, we wanted to let you know about
the many benefits of moving your Direct Deposit to Schwab.

Direct Deposit allows you to automatically transfer funds to
your Schwab account, where you can earn more than many bank
checking accounts.

With Direct Deposit, there are no hold times, so your money is
available immediately for investing or checkwriting.  Plus, you
save time because you don't have to mail checks or visit a
branch to make deposits.

If you already have Direct Deposit, many employers will allow
you to split the deposit between two or more institutions.  You
can keep some portion of your Direct Deposit where it is, and
move the rest to your Schwab account.

Select the link below for instructions on how to set up Direct Deposit.

http://schwab.ed4.net/go/t1/direct/sig/c2/DIRECT/

For questions, call your Signature Services team.

Sincerely,

Mark Sifling
Vice President,
Electronic Payment Products

----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would prefer to receive only account service emails,
please reply to this email indicating your preference. Please
note: doing so will not remove you from any SchwabAlerts or
email newsletters to which you have actively subscribed.

We respect your privacy.  To minimize your receipt of
duplicate information and for internal recordkeeping
purposes, Schwab may track responses, if any, to this offer.
Read more about Schwab's privacy policy at:

http://schwab.ed4.net/go/t2/direct/sig/c2/PRIVACY/

Access to electronic services may be limited or unavailable
during periods of peak demand, market volatility, systems
upgrades or maintenance, or for other reasons.

Notice: All email sent to or from the Charles Schwab
corporate email system may be retained, monitored and/or
reviewed by Schwab personnel.

(C) 2000 Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. All rights reserved.
Member SIPC/NYSE. (1100-2948)  2S


The table below demonstrates the approximate impact of a change in the
"stub" on various TEDs.
     Assumptions:
     1. All securities and futures prices remain unchanged (the only change
is in the stub)
     2. The settlement date used was 5/15/2001
     3. All results were rounded

(Embedded image moved to file: pic13030.pcx)

The information contained herein is based upon sources that we believe to
be reliable, but we do not represent that it is complete or accurate.
Estimates and expectations expressed are not a representation or a
guarantee that such estimates or expectations will be achieved.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
or on behalf of Carr Futures, its affiliates, officers, directors or
employees.  Carr Futures.

Carr Futures
10 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1100
Chicago, IL 60606  USA
Tel:  312-368-2313
Fax:  312-368-2281
bcampbell@carrfut.com
http://www.carrfut.com
 - pic13030.pcx


Dear Traders,

I still have not heard responses from some of you who have been on shift
since I sent the e-mail about MPC cleanup.  We need to check out soon!
There are too many disputes to pull tapes for, so please help me find the
answers.

Thanks,

VA


Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 09/14/00 02:49 PM -----

	"Rick Antonoff" <rantonof@cwt.com>
	09/12/00 01:13 PM

		 To: Carol.St.Clair@enron.com, lmellen@ect.enron.com, lstoler@ect.enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject:

The story below from today's Daily Bankruptcy Review describes efforts to
"jump-start" bankruptcy legislation in the current Congressional session,
particularly with respect to the financial contracts provisions of the
bill.

(See attached file: Bankruptcy Legislation News.doc)
 - Bankruptcy Legislation News.doc


This is just a reminder about the Swap Group Meeting is today from 10 am to
11 am in EB 38C1.  Susan Musch will be speaking about tax issues.


*************************************************** You've received this message because while visiting a Bannerport partner's web site, you opted in to Receive special online offers and discounts.  To unsubscribe from our mailing list: click here . ***************************************************

 $5,000 Computer Sweepstakes! Plus 250 FREE Business Cards... Just For Entering! Click here for your FREE Business Cards!!  Hi-Tech Office of the Future SWEEPSTAKES includes:   Pentium(r) 4 Processor at 1.7Ghz  512MB RDRAM  21 inch Trinitron(r) Monitor  250MB Iomega Zip Built-in Drive  Altec Lansing Dolby Digital Speakers  HP 1100se Laser Jet Printer  HP 6300Cse ScanJet Scanner  Canon S100 PowerShot Digital Camera    Enter right now and as a SPECIAL  BONUS get 250 custom color premium business cards. This $85.00 retail  value is yours... FREE!

 Having trouble clicking on the above offer? Please click here instead .

[IMAGE]
 *************************************************** You've received this message because while visiting a Bannerport partner's web site, you opted in to Receive special online offers and discounts.  To unsubscribe from our mailing list: click here . ***************************************************


Attached is the past due process as approved by The Office of the Chair. We will begin implementing the process effective immediately. Additionally, we will be rolling out a separate process for dispute resolution and for the termination procedures by Service Management. If you have any questions or comments, please call me or Joni Fisher.

Mike Krautz
Sr. Director
Accounts Receivable


Hi Jeff,
Thanks for speaking last Wednesday on 29, it was my first floor meeting with you and I found it informative.  I like your informal, "no bones about it" style, a style I wish more people would adopt.

During the meeting you had made some references about your previous guest which concerned me.  As an employee and shareholder in Enron, it occurred to me that some of the comments would not benefit Enron if they were ever leaked out to the press, (ie. like the Houston Chronicle article on the PRC process).

I do have one question to ask, with your light hearted comment about "Air India"; In order to achieve the vision of being the "World's Leading Company" do you anticipate we will further develop business activities within existing areas, or do you anticipate Enron becoming involved in entirely new business areas?  In other words, do you see us building new businesses which represent a natural evolution of our current activities, or do you anticipate something more radical?  A couple of months ago you said in an interview that you will continue running the company, in a business as usual fashion, will that change?

Thanks for taking the time to speak with us.

Avril
x58768


This is a problem your people should be aware of because I think our usual
practice when we want to verify ownership structure is to call the corporate
secretary's office.  If they are behind, I don't know who we should go to in
the future.  Maybe we need to run everything by corp. tax from now on.  Ugh.
DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 06/01/2000
07:52 AM ---------------------------

Alicia Goodrow
05/31/2000 04:31 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michael Moran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Corporate Secretary's Data Sheets

The erroneous statements found in the Form 2 related to Transwestern today
are traceable in part to the fact that the Corporate Secretary's Data Sheets
are months behind in their accuracy.  This is not the first instance where
serious and costly errors have been made by persons who were relying on the
data sheets for accurate ownership information on Enron Corp. subsidiaries.

If you have any creative ideas on finding a remedy for the extremely long lag
time between the submission of final documentation to the Corporate Secretary
and the updating of the sheets, please let me know.  In the meantime, be
aware that the information is not necessarily reliable.

Thanks

Alicia


Please note on your calendars that a conference call regarding the
above-referenced is scheduled for tomorrow, April 27, 2001, 11:00 a.m. (cst).

The dial-in information is as follows:

1-800-998-2462  Passcode 5197806


Lets also work towards an ISDA with the same credit terms as described below,
with the assumption that the transaction w/in the Omnibus will be pulled into
the ISDA.  Comments/questions, please call.

Ed Sacks

---------------------- Forwarded by Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron on 11/29/2000
03:53 PM ---------------------------

Edward Sacks
11/29/2000 03:05 PM
To: Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie
Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Shawn Anderson/CAL/ECT@ECT, David Pope/CAL/ECT@ECT, Tracy
Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Vermilion Resources, Ltd. - Credit Worksheet

Please prepare an Omnibus Agreement for the proposed transaction with
Vermilion Resources, Ltd.  Comments or questions, please call.

Ed Sacks