-----Original Message-----
From: 	Espinoza, Veronica
Sent:	Thursday, November 01, 2001 9:14 AM
To:	Anderson, Diane; Bailey, Derek; Baumbach, David; Bell, Jean; Boulanger, Patricia; Brown, Angela Y.; Cisneros, Celeste; Crawford, Sharon; Deming, Richard; Dickson, Melia; Giron, Darron C.; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; Hoang, Charlie; Hunter, Larry Joe; Keiser, Kam; Love, Phillip M.; McLaughlin Jr., Errol; Mendoza, Nidia; Moran, Tom; Moscoso, Mirna; Mulvany, Patrick; Negrete, Flavia; Ornelas, Bianca; Otto, Randy; Pernul, Sarah; Reeves, Leslie; Rohauer, Tanya; Seib, Dianne; Sietzema, Linda; Theriot, Kim S.; Wallumrod, Ellen; Wilder, Wesley
Subject:	Credit Report--11/1/01


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Dorland/CAL/ECT on 06/02/2000 07:39
AM ---------------------------

Michael McDermott <Michael.McDermott@spectrongroup.com> on 06/01/2000
06:00:56 AM
To: "'Bryan Moody'" <bhmoody@hotmail.com>, "'B.K. Milne'" <MILNEB@CIBC.CA>,
"'Angus Cowan'" <Angus.Cowan@royalbank.com>, "'Chris Dorland'"
<Chris.Dorland@enron.com>, "'Kevin McElroy'" <kmcelroy@nuheat.com>
cc:
Subject:

Yo Mama`s so fat ....

Your mama is so fat:
When she hauls ass she has to make two trips.
When she dances she makes the band skip.
When she was diagnosed with the flesh eating disease the doctor gave her

13 years to live.

She puts mayonnaise on aspirin. (<- clearly the winner)
Her cereal bowl came with a lifeguard.
When she goes to the zoo the elephants throw her peanuts.
Her high school graduation picture was an aerial photograph.
Her driver`s license says "Picture continued on other side."
She has to iron her pants on the driveway.
The back of her neck looks like a pack of hot dogs.
Yo mama`s so fat, all the restaurants in town have signs that say:
"Maximum Occupancy: 240 Patrons OR Yo Mama"
Yo mama`s so fat, when she ran away, they had to use all four sides of
the milk carton.
Yo mama`s so fat, instead of Levis 501 jeans, she wears Levi`s 1002`s.
Yo mama`s so fat, when she gets in an elevator, it HAS to go down.
Yo mama`s so fat, she was born with a silver shovel in her mouth.
Yo mama`s so fat, she`s got smaller fat women orbiting around her.
Yo mama`s so fat, she could sell shade.


<<laxen.asf>>

/mattias

 - laxen.asf


Ken:

Here is a draft of your talk on "The Evolution of the Modern Energy Company."

I have it as a straight talk, but we could fashion together slides and drop a
lot of this to talking points if you prefer.

There is some new historical material in the front to set up the heart of the
talk; see if you think it is interesting enough as a lead in.

I'm on your calendar at 9:30 to discuss this or "The Future of Business" if
you would like new information or changes.

- Rob


Mark;

It was nice speaking with you at the San Antonio Law Conference.

Back to S?o Paulo (and business too), I wanted to better understand what
would be (or is) your concern with respect to our Bolivian and Brazilian
transactions mentioned below.

Regards,

Sami

---------------------- Forwarded by Sami Arap/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 04/12/2000
06:48 PM ---------------------------

	Rob Walls

	03/28/2000 03:07:16 PM

To: Sami Arap/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Luiz Watanabe/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mark Taylor@ECT

Subject: Re: EnronOnline Credit Derivatives Propsoed Reference Entities

Sami -

Let's discuss.  There may be an issue here.  If you are unable to reach me,
please try and get in touch with Mark Taylor directly.  Thanks.

Sami Arap
03/24/2000 10:21 AM
To: Rob Walls/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Luiz Watanabe/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Re: EnronOnline Credit Derivatives Propsoed Reference Entities

Rob;

Due to Randy's 2-week trip to London, I am not sure if you have received any
of this.

As per Federico Cerisoli's information, with respect to fuel transactions
concerns, we are having discussions in Brazil and Bolivia with subsidiaries
of some of the names I've seen in the file such as: BP Amoco; BG; Exxon
Mobil; Shell; Total.  These discussions are only about physical transactions
and never about credit derivatives.

With respect to Argentina, please see Mike Guerriero's comments below.

Regards,

Sami

---------------------- Forwarded by Sami Arap/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 03/24/2000
01:24 PM ---------------------------

	Enron International

	From:  Michael Guerriero                           03/02/2000 06:59 AM

To: Sami Arap/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Re: EnronOnline Credit Derivatives Propsoed Reference Entities

No Argentine Companies are on this list. If you would like a list of
Argentine ISDAs let me know.

MFG

Sami Arap
02/29/2000 11:44 AM
To: Don Black/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Scott
Porter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michael
Guerriero/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Claudia
Brun/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Marcelo
Parodi/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, D'Arcy
Carroll/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ricardo
Lisboa/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Idel
Metzger/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Luiz
Baccaro/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Fernando
Bacellar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mateus
Andrade/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Marc
Grossmann/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Erwin
Landivar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Maria Ines
Granado/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Remi
Collonges/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Corbin
Barnes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: EnronOnline Credit Derivatives Propsoed Reference Entities

Direct Sales Team;

Please review the attached files and let me know, by the end of this week, if
any of these entities have relationships with your deals.

Thanks,

Sami

---------------------- Forwarded by Sami Arap/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 02/29/2000
11:47 AM ---------------------------

Randy Young
02/29/2000 10:18 AM
To: Luiz Watanabe/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sami
Arap/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
Novak/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robert H
George/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Rob Walls/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, vcferraz@elektro.com.br

Subject: EnronOnline Credit Derivatives Propsoed Reference Entities

Plz review and respond to me this week.

Thanks,
RY
---------------------- Forwarded by Randy Young/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
02/29/2000 10:16 AM ---------------------------

	Rob Walls

	02/28/2000 07:58:27 PM

To: Legal - Mgmt
cc: Mark Taylor@ECT

Subject: EnronOnline Credit Derivatives Propsoed Reference Entities

Please review the attached and let me know asap if any of these entities have
relationships with your business units.  Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Rob Walls/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 02/28/2000
04:58 PM ---------------------------
From: Mark Taylor@ECT on 02/28/2000 04:53 PM
To: Michael Moran@ENRON, Kristina Mordaunt/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Rob
Walls/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: EnronOnline Credit Derivatives Propsoed Reference Entities

As we discussed, attached is the new list of proposed reference entities.  I
have also attached my previous memo outlining the propsosed business and our
concerns.


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 05/16/2001 04:33 PM -----

	Tom Moran/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/16/2001 04:32 PM

		 To: Karen Lambert/ENRON@enronXgate, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/ENRON@enronXgate, Mark A Taylor/EFS/EES@EES, Brant
Reves/ENRON@enronXgate, Debbie R Brackett/ENRON@enronXgate, David
Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Cynthia
Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, Enron Europe Global CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT,
Stephanie Sever/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Claudia
Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, William S Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa
Lees/ENRON@enronXgate, Juana Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana
Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya
Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT, Karen O'Day/ENRON@enronXgate,
Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Kelly Lombardi/ENRON@enronXgate, Brian
Lindsay/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, EOL Call Center@ECT, Bill
D Hare/ENRON@enronXgate, Amy Heffernan/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Molly LaFuze/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Danny
Clark/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Stephanie
Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Teresa Mandola/ENRON@enronXgate, Bill
Kyle/ENRON@enronXgate, Amber Ebow/ENRON@enronXgate, Wendi
Lebrocq/ENRON@enronXgate
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL Approvals: 05-16-01

Please see attached

Regards,
Tom Moran
3-3017


I am still looking for a appropriate Caledonia model.  I have a couple of
finance models, but I don't think those will work.  I will send something
today.  Thanks
Ben


---------------------- Forwarded by Kayne Coulter/HOU/ECT on 01/16/2001 08:03
AM ---------------------------
Smith L Day   01/09/2001 05:27 PM

To: Kayne Coulter/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: My phone number

Kayne:

Corry said that the real time group may not have my phone information yet
because the new phone cards don't have it.

Here it is:

Pager:  877-306-9429
Home:  281-937-9594
Cell:  832-452-7192

Smith


Why don't we file a lawsuit in state district court in Houston, serve them,
and wait for their counsel to appear or take a default. We need to force them
to respond. Let me know what you think.

	Britt Davis@ENRON
	02/02/2001 10:08 AM

		 To: Andrew Edison/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya
Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: ENA v. Triad

Andy,

This is basically a collection action for about $1,800,000 of unpaid spot gas
sales against Triad, a very small company whose address (or at least one
address) is in Columbus, Maryland.   The unpaid sales deals began around
February of 2000.  All the deals were made over the phone by the trader, and
then confirmed with ENA's spot gas sales forms ("confirms").  Per ENA's usual
custom and practice, neither ENA nor Triad signed the confirms, although
there are signature lines.  ENA scheduled the gas due for all of these
deals.  Triad paid off some other deals, but has since stopped sending us any
money.  I am told that the deals that are unpaid began in late February
2000.  Triad's principal, Sherwood Purnell, has apparently admitted in a
recorded telephone conference that he would pay us.  Our information is that
Triad is financially unable to pay us or anyone else.

Per the mandatory arbitration language in the confirms, we have sent an
arbitration demand to Triad.  Triad did not respond.  The AAA has sent out a
list of arbitrators from which the parties are to make selections by February
7.  I have called a telephone number which gives a recording for Triad and an
extension for Purnell, and left a message that I want to discuss the case.
This was on Monday.  I have also had  Becky, my legal assistant, call up
Triad's registered agent for service of process, although the Maryland
secretary of state's office shows that Triad is no longer in good standing.
The person whose name is listed as the registered agent answered and told
Becky (a) he was still the right party to receive service of process and (b)
he was "aware of us".  This leads me to believe that the address that we have
been using is a good address.  We did get someone to sign for documents that
we sent to that address.

What I don't want to do, however,  is go all the way through arbitration, get
a default judgment, then, when we try to enforce it, have Triad complain that
we sent the demand and the pleadings to the wrong address.

My plan is to ask the AAA for a fifteen-day extension of time within which to
send our demand and other relevant pleadings to the registered agent and any
other address that looks viable, by Federal Express or certified mail, so
that we get a receipt.  So long as we get the registered agent to sign for
these things, I feel a lot more comfortable about proceeding.   Giving Triad
an extension of time to answer also makes us look good.

Parenthetically, unfortunately, given Triad's attitude, I think it likely
that after we get an arbitration award, Triad will choose not to abide by it
until, at a minimum, we file a lawsuit in Maryland to have the award
enforced.  I don't see a way around that problem.

Let me know if it is okay to ask for the extension of time.

Britt

Thanks.

Britt


Thank you.

	Vicki Sharp@EES
	03/08/2001 08:23 AM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, mday@gmssr.com
		 cc: Leslie Hiltabrand/HOU/EES@EES
		 Subject: NOTICE: CTC Collection Issues Conference Call

please see the dial in number and call info below.  Please use the
participant code.
---------------------- Forwarded by Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES on 03/08/2001 08:22
AM ---------------------------

	Enron Energy Services

	From:  Leasa Lopez                           03/07/2001 04:11 PM

To: Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: NOTICE: CTC Collection Issues Conference Call

Vicki,

Your information for the conference call is as follows:

   Dial In #:              (888) 422-7109
   Host Passcode:    298822

---------------------- Forwarded by Leasa Lopez/HOU/EES on 03/07/2001 04:05
PM ---------------------------

	Enron Energy Services

	From:  Vicki Sharp                           03/07/2001 04:05 PM

Sent by: Leasa Lopez
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, jklauber@llgm.com, Minal Dalia/HOU/EES@EES,
jbennett@gmssr.com, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Bob Williams
cc:
Subject: NOTICE: CTC Collection Issues Conference Call

Please plan to participate in the following conference call:

    Date:                Thursday, March 8, 2001
    Time:   Noon (CT)

10:00 AM (PT)
    Dial In #:          (888) 422-7109
    Passcode:     423404

Please contact Leasa Lopez at (713) 853-6899, if you have any difficulty
connecting to this call.


i sent it today so you should get it by thurs.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Larry Centola"<Larry_Centola@laed.uscourts.gov>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 1:14 PM
To:	Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:	Re[2]: Tickets

     Please send the tickets to:

     The Honorable G. Thomas Porteous, Jr.
     United States District Judge
     United States District Court Eastern District of Louisiana
     500 Camp Street
     Room C206
     New Orleans, LA 70130
     attn: Larry Centola

     Thanks a bunch.

______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: RE: Tickets
Author:  <Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com> at 5DC-LAE-Internet
Date:    10/23/2001 7:18 AM

i got them.  i left you a voice mail last night.  send me your address and
i will mail them today.

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "Larry Centola"<Larry_Centola@laed.uscourts.gov>@ENRON
   Sent:   Monday, October 22, 2001 7:26 PM
   To:     Lenhart, Matthew
   Subject:  Tickets

        Did you get the tickets from Tim?  Send me an e-mail or call me at
        504-589-7585.

        Larry

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
maycontain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended
 recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is
strictly p rohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to
receive for t he recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp.
at enron.messag ing.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the
message. This e-mail ( and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an
offer (or an acceptance) a nd do not create or evidence a binding and
enforceable contract between Enron Co rp. (or any of its affiliates) and the
intended recipient or any other party, an d may not be relied on by anyone as
the basis of a contract by estoppel or other wise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


mirant and koch arent selling physical


good news is that john endorsed me ideas for change on his last trip thru
london.
don't know if you can sit in on a strategy meeting for oil group.  would be
nice to have
you there because in terms of opportunities little has changed n past couple
of years.
i'll give you an update when i know when i'm coming.


Laurel:  Will John be trading in the names of BOTH ENA and ECT Investments,
Inc. or only one of them?  Is John located in London temporarily?  Will
Houston book the trades pursuant to the agency agreement? (I'm not certain
which companies are covered by the agreement).  Let's discuss.  Thanks.  Sara

	Laurel Adams
	09/01/2000 07:50 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: New terminal install for Enron London

Sara,

I'm sure that as soon as the technical kinks are worked out, John will want
to begin trading European stocks right away.  Could you please have a look at
the Instinet agreement, and see what changes might be necessary to facilitate
this?  Please let me know what you think.  THanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Laurel Adams/HOU/ECT on 09/01/2000 07:45
AM ---------------------------

John Greene
09/01/2000 02:47 AM
To: Julie Pechersky/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laurel Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: New terminal install for Enron London

Julie,

This is the Instinet install.  Who do you think is the best person to
coordinate the install?  Please forward this to them and ask them to contact
me on ext. 3-5534 in London.

Laurel,

Please be aware that we are wanting to add european equity trading to the
existing Instinet contract.  Although it may change at a later date, we would
like for this activity to be done in the name of ECT Investments so I am not
sure how much the contract will change.  As I have mentioned, there is a
chance that we may have to have such trading done out of another entity but
we can worry about changing any contracts when that happens.  I want to get
the technological kinks worked out during the "down time" so that as soon as
we have figured out how this activity is going to be structured we can begin
trading immediately.  I will direct the Instinet contract contact to you as
soon as I find out who that is.

Thanks and regards,
John
---------------------- Forwarded by John Greene/LON/ECT on 01/09/2000 08:39
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Jennifer_Burkhard@Instinet.com                           31/08/2000
21:48

To: John.Greene@enron.com
cc: Mark_Freeman@Instinet.com, Nigel_Lucas@Instinet.com,
Kerry_Flynn@Instinet.com

Subject: New terminal install for Enron London

Hi John,

Thanks for taking the time to chat with me regarding your new London office.
You are very smart to start setting up the equipment ahead of time.  My
colleague in London is Mark Freeman.  He will be calling you to discuss the
details of your account.  If you need to reach Mark in London call 44 207 680
3191.

As we discussed on the phone, we will need to pass your account through credit
committee at Instinet London.  It sounds like Enron Houston is the same entity
as Enron London.  Hopefully this will make the legality issues simple.  In
addition, you mentioned that the phone lines to Reuters have been installed.
We
can usually hook the Instinet terminal right up to the Reuters phone line.
Please let me know once you have the name of the technician handling the
account
so we can contact him/her.

I ran you through some of the functionality Instinet provides on the
international side.  We should probably talk about this in more detail soon.
I
will be in London the week of 9/11-9/15 so perhaps I could bring your new
coverage person over to meet if you think that makes sense.

In the meantime, if you have any questions, comments or concerns please
contact
me on 212 310-7268.  As I mentioned, I am still on jury duty but hope to be
off
by next Tuesday.  I always check messages from the road.  Good luck with the
apartment search.  You can not go wrong in Chelsea it's fantastic.  Have a
great
weekend!!!

Jenn

<<Disclaimer>>

This message is intended only for the use of the Addressee and may contain
information that is PRIVILEGED and/or CONFIDENTIAL or both.

This email is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the
recipient(s) named above.

If the reader of this email is not an intended recipient, you have received
this
email in error and any review, dissemination, distribution or copying is
strictly prohibited.

If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately
by return email and permanently delete the copy you received.

Thank you.


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/07/2001 09:49
AM ---------------------------
From: Geriann Warner on 03/07/2001 09:07 AM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve Montovano/NA/Enron@Enron, Ben
Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Steven Krimsky/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Marcia A Linton/NA/Enron@Enron, Chauncey Hood/NA/Enron@ENRON, Lorie
Leigh/HOU/ECT@ECT, Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Conf. Call  - 3/7 @ 10:00 cst: Tripp Scott Proposed Terms of
Engagement

Per Marchris' request, I've set up a conference call for today at 10:00 cst.
Please let me know ASAP if you WILL NOT be able to participate.

Call in  - 1.800.998.2462

Pass code  - 5058917

Geriann Warner
GA - The Americans
Tel: 713-853-5036
Fax: 713-853-7297

----- Forwarded by Geriann Warner/NA/Enron on 03/07/2001 08:30 AM -----

	Marchris Robinson
	03/06/2001 05:19 PM

		 To: Geriann Warner/NA/ENRON@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Tripp Scott Proposed Terms of Engagement

Set up conference call.  Page me with info.

MR
----- Forwarded by Marchris Robinson/NA/Enron on 03/06/2001 05:18 PM -----

	Kay Mann
	03/06/2001 04:57 PM

		 To: Marchris Robinson/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve Montovano/NA/Enron@Enron, Ben
Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven Krimsky/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Tripp Scott Proposed Terms of Engagement

Ben and I can make it.

Kay

From: Marchris Robinson on 03/06/2001 04:30 PM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Steve Montovano/NA/Enron@Enron, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ben
Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven Krimsky/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Tripp Scott Proposed Terms of Engagement

I think we should do a phone conference to resolve the outstanding issues
regarding the engagement of "local lobbying firms" by ENA.  I will schedule a
call for tomorrow at 10:30am (cst).  Please advise if that time works with
your schedule.  Thanks.

Marchris
----- Forwarded by Marchris Robinson/NA/Enron on 03/06/2001 04:21 PM -----

	Kay Mann
	03/06/2001 09:27 AM

		 To: Marchris Robinson/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Tripp Scott Proposed Terms of Engagement

Hi Marchris,

I'm in ENA Legal, and I'm looking for the right person to discuss this with.
Christi Nicholay suggested I get you involved.  Please give me a call at 713
345 7566 to discuss.

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/06/2001 09:29
AM ---------------------------

Ben F Jacoby@ECT
03/05/2001 10:48 AM
Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Tripp Scott Proposed Terms of Engagement

OK. This guy's a lawyer by training, but we're hiring him as a lobbyist.
Roger was previously looking into this, and proposed our standard form
agreement. Steve and I were wondering if we could work off of Tripp Scott's
proposed form, considering that he will not be representing us as our counsel.

Please let me know.

Thanks,

Ben

Kay Mann@ENRON
03/04/2001 02:27 PM
To: Ben F Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Tripp Scott Proposed Terms of Engagement

Ben,

What are these folks supposed to do for Enron?  I had heard a rumor that we
were looking to hire someone to lobby for us on a success fee basis.  Is this
the same deal?  I know on the international side there were hoops to jump
through before such an engagement could be signed off on.  I'll have to check
to see what the drill is on this side of the street.

Kay

	From:  Ben F Jacoby @ ECT                           02/28/2001 12:18 PM

Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Kay Mann
cc:

Subject: Tripp Scott Proposed Terms of Engagement

Per my earlier e-mail, attached is Tripp Scott's form.
---------------------- Forwarded by Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT on 02/28/2001 12:17 PM
---------------------------

Steven Krimsky@ENRON
02/28/2001 09:11 AM
To: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Tripp Scott Proposed Terms of Engagement

As discussed, Roger has no problem engaging Tripp Scott.  He does want to use
Enron's standard 9 page engagement letter in lieu of the attached 2 pager
received from Tripp Scott.  Is this necessary - any thoughts?

Steve

---------------------- Forwarded by Steven Krimsky/Corp/Enron on 02/28/2001
09:08 AM ---------------------------

Steven Krimsky
02/16/2001 03:44 PM
To: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roger Balog@ECT, Marchris Robinson/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Tripp Scott Proposed Terms of Engagement

As discussed in Fort Pierce, Tripp Scott is that insurance policy I've been
looking for to help secure the commission vote in Pompano.  Tripp Scott will
also assist us in our door knock campaign in the County & Tallahassee.
Pozzuoli is a mover & shaker and is on a first name basis with Jeb Bush -  he
was the Chairman for the Bush/Cheny Broward County re-count.

Bill Keith & Debbie Orshefsky highly recommends the engagement.

Lets discuss Tuesday.

Steve
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven Krimsky/Corp/Enron on 02/16/2001
03:38 PM ---------------------------

"Edward J. Pozzuoli (Paulette R Segal)" <PRS@trippscott.usa.com> on
02/14/2001 01:56:42 PM
To: steven.krimsky@enron.com
cc: TSCS.TSCS-1.ejp@mail4.allegro.net

Subject: Proposed Terms of Engagement

It was a pleasure meeting with you and Debbie on Monday afternoon.  Per our
discussion, enclosed is Tripp Scott's proposed terms of engagement as well as
an abbreviated description of the firm and its key directors.

I look forward to speaking with you soon.

Ed
 - 239299.WPD
 - 239243.WPD


Imelda,

Could you please re-map HPL meter #0073 to the IF-HPL/Shpchan mid market
curve.  Please keep all other mappings for this zone and point the same.

Thanks,

Eric
x3-0977


Daren,

Should I change the counterparty on this sale, or is that handled by
marketing?  Also, we may need to look at changing the Storage Agmt.   Please
advise.

Mary
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Poorman/NA/Enron on 12/14/2000 07:26
AM ---------------------------

Julie Meyers@ECT
12/13/2000 05:12 PM
To: Mary Poorman/NA/Enron@Enron, Jackie Young/HOU/ECT@ECT, Aimee
Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: cannon assignment

Has the volumes for the deal below been nomd' yet under the new deal.  Credit
is having a cow because they are showing exposure still under Cannon.  Is
there a way that we can get this done tomorrow?

Julie

---------------------- Forwarded by Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT on 12/13/2000 05:05
PM ---------------------------

Julie Meyers
12/12/2000 05:03 PM
To: Mary Poorman/NA/Enron@Enron, Jackie Young/HOU/ECT@ECT, Aimee
Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: cannon assignment

---------------------- Forwarded by Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT on 12/12/2000 04:58
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Robert Cotten                           12/12/2000 03:29 PM

To: Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: cannon assignment

Julie,

Cannon is not a wellhead producer.  The meters below are assigned to the
following individuals:

Meter #  Scheduler

68  Mary Poorman
4132  Jackie Young
1040  Aimee Lannou
1606  Mary Poorman

These schedulers should be advised of the changes.

Bob

Julie Meyers
12/12/2000 01:49 PM
To: Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristen J Hanson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: cannon assignment

New deal 529753.

Robert, please do your magic.

Kris, I'm not sure who in your group this should go to, this is a sale.

Julie

Brant Reves
12/11/2000 12:24 PM
To: Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: cannon assignment

The trades below were originally executed between HPL and Cannon Interests
Houston per terms of a specific Master Physical Agreement.  After recieving
back executed documentation, we are ready to have the trades offically moved
within the various Enron capuring systems from Cannon to Kinder Morgan Texas
Pipeline, Inc. per the terms and conditions of the recently executed Master
Physical Agreement between HPL and Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline, Inc.

First, here are the TAG Nos. of the trades we wish to have assigned.

NU2813
NA0376

Second, several trades are listed within a ERMS book called:  P A M
These trades show a 12-31-00 expiry and their Nos. are:

522284
830689
892696
904035
904276

I am not sure what these numbers are.  But, could you move them as well.

Thanks for your help.

brant


Richard Melancon
1815 1/2 Forest Lake Drive
Tuscaloosa, AL 35401
rmelancon@simplecom.net

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you
made from selling Enron stock before the company
declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee
Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's
employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide
relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't
afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made
millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers
and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of
Enron's employees were financially devastated when the
company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans
were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit
during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result,
there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay
their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is
bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million
worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the
company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this
money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those
Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Richard Melancon


?
Regards,
Ben Bedell
ESBIN & BEDELL, LLP
495 South Main St.
New City, New York 10956
Phone: 845-634-7909
Fax: 845-634-4160
?

The information contained in this electronic message is confidential and
intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the
reader  of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or
agent  responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified  that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
communication is  strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please  immediately notify us by telephone at?845-
634-7909 or by e-mail at bbb@debt-masters.com.

The information contained in this electronic mail message is privileged and
confidential and is or may be protected by the attorney- client privilege,
the  work product doctrine, joint defense privileges, trade secret
protections,  and/or other applicable protections from disclosure. The sender
of this  electronic mail message intends to preserve the confidentiality of
the enclosed  information and does not waive any applicable privilege or
protection from  disclosure. Thank you.

?
?
 - 224-86.Funding Memo.xls


---------------------- Forwarded by John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron on 08/15/2000
07:08 AM ---------------------------

Scott Neal@ECT
08/14/2000 05:33 PM
To: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike
Maggi/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: NYMEX Advisory Committee Meeting

A quick summary of the NYMEX meeting I attended on August 10.

1.   eNYMEX  NYMEX has begun developing an internet based trading system to
replace Access and to handle basis trading.
   The system is targeted to launch some time during Q4  2000.   The basis
products that might be traded are    Nymex swap, AECO (C$/gj  fxd/float),
Transco Z6, Chicago City Gate, Houston Ship Channel.

2.  TAS   Overwhelming support of the TAS pilot program from trade players
with locals opposed.  A motion was passed to    add expiration day to the
current TAS pilot program.  The motion is to be presented to the NYMEX board
in the    next few weeks.

3. AGA data release Favorable comments regarding the 1pm release of the
weekly storage data.

4.  Sabine Hub discounts  Sabine is considering offering some discount
through the Hub for volume commitment.

Please let me know if you have any questions.


I will be taking the next couple of days off.  I will be in town (or on Mt. Hood) and should be reachable by cell phone.  In the event that my cell phone gets turned off (which looks highly likely right now) I will steal my wife's cell phone and can be reached at 503-913-6106.


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 02/07/2001 07:50 AM -----

	Expense Server@Enron_Development
	02/05/2001 02:44 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: <<Concur Expense Document>> - January 2001

The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: Laura Glenn
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: January 2001
Report Total: $225.29
Amount Due Employee: $225.29

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur
Expense.
http://nahou-wwxms01p


Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490

http://edms.livelink.enron.com/ena/livelink.exe/7560144/96032029_Base_Contract
_12_30_99.pdf?func=doc.Fetch&nodeid=7560144


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 03/24/2000
08:57 AM ---------------------------

Tim Heizenrader
03/23/2000 08:09 AM
To: James B Fallon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Western Strategy Briefing Materials

Slides from this week's strategy session are attached:


See comments and recommendations in sections 2.1, 3.1, 11.2(b).

"Way, Karen S. - CHI" <karen.way@piperrudnick.com> on 08/16/2000 05:01:56 PM
To: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>, "'herman.manis@enron.com'"
<herman.manis@enron.com>
cc: "'fred.mitro@enron.com'" <fred.mitro@enron.com>, "Shindler, Donald A. -
CHI" <Donald.Shindler@piperrudnick.com>
Subject: #3148597 v1 - livingston county - fehr option to purchase

 <<302PL01_.DOC>>

Kay and Herman:
Per my conversation with Fred Mitro, please review the attached Land Option
Agreement for the Fehr property in Livingston County, Illinois for purposes
of off-balance sheet suitability.  Please call with any questions.  Thank
you.

Karen S. Way
Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe
203 N. LaSalle
Chicago, Illinois 60601
email:  karen.way@piperrudnick.com
(ph) 312-368-2152
(fax) 312-630-6347

____________________________________________________________________________
The e-mail address and domain name of the sender changed on November 1,
1999.  Please update your records.

The information contained in this communication may be confidential, is
intended only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be legally
privileged.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please re-send this communication to
the sender and delete the original message and any copy of it from your
computer system.
Thank you.

For more information about Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe, please visit us at
http://www.piperrudnick.com/
____________________________________________________________________________

 - 302PL01_.DOC


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 11/06/2000
10:50 AM ---------------------------

Maureen Raymond
11/03/2000 09:02 PM
To: John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Eric Gadd/LON/ECT@ECT, Maria
Abello/LON/ECT@ECT, Caroline Mudd/LON/ECT@ECT, Eve Starmer/LON/ECT@ECT,
Lauren Urquhart/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Poullain-Patterson/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Lunch Presentation

As promised, attached is the "Fundamentals of Base Metals Pricing" speech.  I
look forward to seeing everyone again next week!

Regards,

Maureen


Lisa Connolly
office, 713-345-4840
cell, 713-569-9563
home, 713-524-5189

Assistant - Lisa Wolfe
office, 713-345-4847
cell, 713-503-2673
fax, 713-646-3060


It won't let me open the document.  Can you ressend it?

	Carlos Alatorre/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/01/2001 04:14 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Lisa Lees/ENRON@enronXgate, Stephanie Sever/ENRON@enronXgate
		 Subject: FX Top Counterparties

Please see below list of Top counterparties to have access to FX product
Please let me know if you have any questions/comments
Thanks
Carlos


This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information.  No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and
all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify
the
sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose,
distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve
the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.
Any
views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
except
where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state
them to be the views of any such entity.
Unless otherwise stated, any pricing information given in this message
is
indicative only, is subject to change and does not constitute an offer
to
deal at any price quoted.
Any reference to the terms of executed transactions should be treated as
preliminary only and subject to our formal written confirmation.

 - Blank.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Andrew Kelemen/HOU/ECT on 08/21/2000
08:33 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Jonalan Page                           08/18/2000 02:51 PM

To: Andrew Kelemen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: contact info for project E2

Work (503) 464-7731
Fax (503) 464-3740
Cell (503) 539-0355
E-mail Jpage@enron.com

Phone (503) 228-6010
 1616 SW Harbor Way, Building A #601
 Portland, OR  97201-5166

Andrew Kelemen
08/18/2000 12:38 PM
To: Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Gray Calvert/PDX/ECT@ECT, Saji
John/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jonalan Page/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: contact info for project E2

Please send me the following info for inclusion on the working group list for
project e2

Work phone, fax, cell, email
Home phone, fax, email, address


Stuart:
These are the questions we have answered for them.  Please review and make
sure that they are in accordance with ENA's information policies.  We are
sending this out to them today.  Thanks
Ben


Hi Tom:

Thanks for the prompt  and accurate evaluation of what MODREG does.
I know about you leaving Enron and what your schedules looks like, so I think I will try to make the best use of time and resources in order to have an SDDP model up and running for Argentina.
In the meeting we had with Vince K.,  and  after reviewing the calibration exercise  run with MODREG we have decided to:
1. Set up the Argentinean system into the SDDP  model
	* I would like to know what information you need in order to get this done
2. Run the calibration exercise with the SDDP model in order to compare results.
	* Feed the model with actual data (hydro generation, Exports) from January to June and get the output for Prices, Thermal Generation, Exports/Imports

Please find attached the presentation regarding MODREG and the calibration results.

I will be talking to the consultants in order to get more information in some topics we need further research such as. Transmission losses, forced dispatched units and gas availability.

Please contact me so I can start gathering all you need to get the model running

Regards

Jorge Gumucio

From:	Tom Halliburton/ENRON@enronXgate on 09/28/2001 02:29 PM CDT
To:	Remi Collonges/SA/Enron@Enron, David M Rosenberg/SA/Enron@Enron, Jorge Gumucio/SA/Enron@Enron
cc:	Vince J Kaminski/ENRON@enronXgate, Zimin Lu/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject:	ModReg for Argentina

Folks,
Here's some preliminary comments on the model we are using for Argentina.  Please correct me on any misunderstandings!

ModReg was written by consultants in Buenos Aires.  Documentation is available in Spanish only.  All data input is by means of text files, which require column orientated input, ie numbers must go into specific columns.  Detailed documentation has been provided specifying the data format for each file.

A weekly time step is used, with five load blocks per week, and a time horizon of one year, typically.  Each model run requires about 6 hours of processing.

ModReg is a modified version of the model used by the grid operator.  It is coded in Fortran and requires a CPLEX licence.  CPLEX is a powerful linear programming solver, developed by ILOG.  As the model is written in Fortran, the very good higher level interface to CPLEX is not available, so the code will have to access CPLEX at a lower level.

We have no documentation describing how the model algorithms.  Source code is not available at present.

ModReg appears to model around 30 busses and 71 lines.  Lines are characterised by from bus number, to bus number, maximum MW capacity in each direction, a percentage  loss factor, cost of transmission in each direction, and some other details.  Demand data is specified by week and load block for each bus.  Thermal plants have a heat rate and maintenance schedule specified, with the possibility of multiple fuels. I understand that hydro generation schedules for each historical inflow condition are an input to the model as they are calculated elsewhere.

From the above it appears that we have an unsatisfactory situation:
	ModReg is difficult to use
	we do not know in detail what the model does
	we do not have documentation describing the algorithm
 	because source code is not available, we are completely dependent on the consultants.

If Enron is to continue modeling Argentina, we should as a minimum have a model that we understand, is reasonably easy to use, and is documented.  A graphical user interface is really needed to make ModReg easier to use.  Documentation is of course essential.  We should not use a model developed by consultants without documentation.  These steps would enable us to have more confidence in model results, and shortens the learning curve to enable more people to use model.

SDDP is likely to be a suitable replacement.  It would require reseroir inflow data rather than the calculated generations.  The regional loads etc could be modeled using the DC loadflow feature, with zero impedance lines.  Transmission losses in SDDP are a quadratic function of power flows, so some guesses would have to be made for line resistence values.  Setting up an SDDP model to represent all the aspects included in ModReg would be a time consuming job, that would require a good undertanding of the data for both models.  Some direct cut and paste of data from one model's files to the others will be possible with a suitable column oriented text editor.  However the end result would be a model with the desirable attributes of documention, GUI interface, and flexible output.

Tom Halliburton


You have received this email because the requester specified you as their Manager. Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000069038&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000069038
Request Create Date : 10/17/01 5:54:24 PM
Requested For       : chris.abel@enron.com
Resource Name       : Enpower North America West Production Adhoc_Print - Ad Hoc Hedge Management Printing
Resource Type       : Applications


Word on the street is that the CA ISO staff is NOT asking for a vote on price
caps at the Board meeting on Thursday.  (I was speculating that the Board
would be asked to lower the price caps to $100 or to adopt the CEO's
proposal, which he filed at FERC on 10/20.)  The vote will be put off a vote
until late November.  No reason given -- but presumably so they don't look
like idiots if FERC comes out with something radically different on November
1.

But, I have also heard that one Board member -- Mike Florio of TURN -- has
asked for a vote on his proposal -- load-differentiated price caps (e. g.$250
when area load is 40,000 MW or more, $150 when load is between 30,000 and
40,000, etc.) If a few Board members, i.e., the utilities and some of the
munis gang up, they can force a vote.  I'm expecting one, but given the
staff's/CEO position, there may not be sufficient votes to go lower until
FERC comes out with its proposal.

Maybe small miracles can happen in California ...


Jim:  I didn't know if Clint had already forwarded this to you.  Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 10/31/2000 10:53 AM -----

	"Franz, Philip" <pfranz@lehman.com>
	10/27/2000 04:36 PM

		 To: "'Clint.Freeland@Enron.com'" <Clint.Freeland@Enron.com>,
"'Sara.Shackleton@Enron.com'" <Sara.Shackleton@Enron.com>
		 cc: "Rosica, Paul" <prosica@lehman.com>, "Karna, Angie" <AKarna@lehman.com>,
"Franz, Philip" <pfranz@lehman.com>
		 Subject: Enron Forward

Clint and Sara,
I have enclosed the revised confirm for your review - one blackline version
and one clean version - per Paul Rosica.

 <<ENRON.forward.10.26.00.blackline.doc>>

 <<ENRON.forward.10.26.00.clean.doc>>

Enjoy your weekend.
Regards,
Phil

Phil Franz
Transaction Management/Equity Derivatives
Lehman Brothers
(212)526-8482
pfranz@lehman.com
> This message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the
> designated recipient(s) named above.  If you are not the intended
> recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any review,
> dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly
> prohibited.  This communication is for information purposes only and
> should not be regarded as an offer to sell or as a solicitation of an
> offer to buy any financial product, an official confirmation of any
> transaction, or as an official statement of Lehman Brothers Inc., its
> subsidiaries or affiliates.  Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be
> secure or error-free.  Therefore, we do not represent that this
> information is complete or accurate and it should not be relied upon as
> such.  All information is subject to change without notice.
>

 - ENRON.forward.10.26.00.blackline.doc
 - ENRON.forward.10.26.00.clean.doc


When: Thursday, October 04, 2001 2:30 PM-3:30 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where: EB3259

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*


End of July should be fine.  I am planning to be out July 26, 27 and 28,
taking our 16 year-old on a tour of some college campuses before she starts
her junior year.  Motivational, I hope!  --Sally

Kathie Grabstald on 06/30/2000 02:48:12 PM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: ENSIDE

Thanks for your note.  I have another profile interview to do with Mark
Frevert on July 12.  At that time, we will schedule a photographer for both
of you for the end of July.  Will this work for you?  If not, just let me
know!

Kathie


Janet.  I'm back from vacation!   I have updated the flow volumes for HL&P


Lucy,

 I will call you this afternoon to discuss the things in your email.

Phillip


Ms. Halligan,
Mr. Mark Baldwin with Interstate Gas Services will be representing
Transwestern Pipeline Company during Tuesday's hearing.  Transwestern is a
party of record in this proceeding.  Mr. Baldwin is Transwestern's California
consultant, and is well versed in state regulatory matters and, in
particular, this docket.  On behalf of Transwestern, Mr. Baldwin will address
the following issues:

1. The PD in light of recent events in both the natural gas and electricity
markets in California.
2  A comparison of certain features of the PD and the alternative settlement
(Comprehensive Settlement) supported by SoCalGas Company and the majority of
the stakeholders, including Transwestern Pipeline.
3. The relationship between the CPUC's decision in this proceeding and the
ongoing investigation of the sufficiency of infrastructure for both natural
gas and electricity.

My understanding is that the CPUC prefers the speakers be brief.  With your
permission, Mr. Baldwin's remarks will be limited to no more than 5 minutes,
with an opportunity for questions to follow.

Please let me know if there are any other guidelines the CPUC would like
parties to follow in this proceeding.  Also, please let me know if there are
any questions that I can answer for you.

Jeffery C. Fawcett
Transwestern Pipeline Company
713-853-1521

jfawcet@enron.com


When does the next league start and who is it run by (i.e. city, YMCA, etc.)?

Thanks,

Eric

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dinh, Huy
Sent:	Thursday, September 27, 2001 1:14 PM
To:	Bass, Eric
Subject:	Flag Football

I 'm the Enron contact for flag football.  My ext 3-9696.

HXD


Andy,

FYI I have signed up for this course.  If you do not believe this would be worth my time or the budget please let me know as I must cancel 3 business days prior to the event in order not to be charged.

Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Enron Announcements/Corp/Enron@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Enron+20Announcements_Corp_Enron+40ENRON@ENRON.com]  On Behalf Of Investinme@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, May 30, 2001 12:22 AM
To:	Enron Wholesale Services@ENRON
Subject:	Investinme Course Offering

Presentations That Work
June 11 & 12  8:00 am - 5:00 pm
in EB560    Cost:  $900
Limited seats available

This intensive 16-hours workshop includes nine presentations and provides practice and feedback from peers, instructors, and videotape.  The training focuses on instruction and practice in organization, delivery skills, visual design and use, and question-and-answer models.  Participants will receive personalized, confidential feedback from the instructor and will develop a self-improvement action plan.  Customized exercises give participants first-hand experience in one-on-one, small group, impromptu, and sit-down settings.

As a result of this course, you will be able to:

?	Reduce preparation time
?	Increase rapport and persuasions
?	Organize your ideas for impact
?	Select appropriate details
?	Plan the presentation
?	Design and use visuals effectively
?	Use a dynamic delivery style
?	Handle questions and answers appropriately

Please login and enroll through the InvestInMe website, http://www.corptraining.com/index.cfm?company=enron.  If you have any questions, please call 713 853-0357.


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 08/31/2000
07:32 PM ---------------------------

David W Delainey
08/31/2000 07:32 PM
To: Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrew S Fastow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fred L
Kelly/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Raymond Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Haug/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Blue Girl - $1.2MM option expires today - need to know whether to
extend, or..... will we be able to get approval

Guys, ENA will take responsibility for the two 7EA's.  We do not currently
have any projects for the Westinghouse 501D5A's.  However, I do not know what
Bowen's view might be for EIM or Haug's for CALME.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 08/31/2000
07:17 PM ---------------------------
From: Rick Buy on 08/31/2000 01:31 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Blue Girl - $1.2MM option expires today - need to know whether to
extend, or..... will we be able to get approval

fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Rick Buy/HOU/ECT on 08/31/2000 01:31 PM
---------------------------

Fred L Kelly@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
08/31/2000 11:52 AM
To: Karen L Barbour@ECT
cc: Rick Buy@ECT
Subject: Blue Girl - $1.2MM option expires today - need to know whether to
extend, or..... will we be able to get approval

Karen - let me know if it would be beneficial to brief Rick or Jeff.  I'll
stop whatever I'm doing if necessary.  I think on this particular turbine
purchase...... there is great interest from ENA, Calme, and EECC third pty.
I agree that in general - we can't take our eye off the ball with respect to
the long turbines.  F.Kelly


Hey Jeff, we are meeting tomorrow because Molly is out today.  Is that OK?

	From:  Molly Johnson                           06/16/2000 03:23 PM

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff W Westover/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Meeting

Jeff has training on Monday, so he would like to meet at 1:30 on Tuesday at
his desk.

Let me know if anyone has a problem with that.

Thank You,
Molly


Yo!!!
It's cold, its wet, its raining. But at least in Portland we have F-15 fighter jets being scrambled over the city. Gotta love it. what's the word. Drop me a line on the cellular--(503) 887-3449.
B

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Kuehn [mailto:scottkuehn@go2netmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 2:28 PM
To: Williams III, Bill
Subject: Re: What up?

Awww Jeahh.  It's nice to hear from you.  Ive
been trying to get in touch with yall for quite
some time.

Please reply back to this message and let me
know how "Things" are.  Yes, the question is
ambiguous, but try to go with it.

In response to "What up?:"

Everything has reached a new status quo. I live
in Gig Harbor and attend class at UW Tacoma
(UWT for short).  Class is great and their are
plenty of beautiful lasses for viewing
pleasure.  Hopefully I will be out of GH soon.
I will start looking for jobs in Portland,
Seattle, and SF (possibly) in Spring.  I have
not been working on my tan.

I would really like to visit the city of Roses
in the next few weekends.  What are your
plans?   I hope everything is well with you.
Please write back soon.

Buenos Nachos,
Scott

Sent by Go2net Mail!


We just received this in electronic form, and are reviewing.
---------------------- Forwarded by Ray Alvarez/NA/Enron on 07/12/2001 05:38
PM ---------------------------

"Ronald Carroll" <rcarroll@bracepatt.com> on 07/12/2001 05:36:02 PM
To: <mmilner@coral-energy.com>, <rreilley@coral-energy.com>,
<ray.alvarez@ei.enron.com>, <acomnes@enron.com>,
<Christi.L.Nicolay@enron.com>, <dfulton@enron.com>, <jsteffe@enron.com>,
<linda.robertson@enron.com>, <richard.sanders@enron.com>,
<robert.frank@enron.com>, <smara@enron.com>, <snovose@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Fwd: Wagner's Recommendation

Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 16:20:56 -0500
From: "Tracey Bradley" <tbradley@bracepatt.com>
To: "Andrea Settanni" <asettanni@bracepatt.com>, "Dan Watkiss"
<dwatkiss@bracepatt.com>, "Ronald Carroll" <rcarroll@bracepatt.com>
Subject: Wagner's Recommendation
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_4D173548.B5D4A936"

** High Priority **

It's attached.  Please take care of getting it to the appropriate people at
Coral and Enron.

 - wagner recommendation.txt


Thanks for the tip last night!  I called and ragged around my thieving ins.
company this morning and they are going to cough up some serious insurance
for me and Sandra at suuper-cheap pre XXX prices.  Cool.  My only concern at
this point is that my over-insured status may create undesirable incentives
for the little ladies in my life (the dreaded "worth more dead than alive
syndrome"!)  Adios amigo!  DF


john,
Attached are two spreadsheets with the data you've requesed.
Let me know if you have any questions.

Samer
x3-9979


Looks fine. Thanks Kevin.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hyatt, Kevin
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 10:42 AM
To:	Harris, Steven
Cc:	Lindberg, Lorraine; Watson, Kimberly
Subject:	Proposed EG Projects.xls

Per Bill Wood's request, the attached sheet has those power plants (marked with "XX" in the left column) that are currently connected or proposed to be connected to the existing Transwestern Pipeline system.  Let me know if you have questions.  If the information is satisfactory, please forward this message to Bill Wood.

kh

 << File: Proposed EG Projects.xls >>


I suggest you, Steve, and I make time on the p.m. of the 13th, or the a.m. of
the 14th, to discuss.  thanks for the note.   mcs

From: Mike Dahlke@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 05/03/2001 06:55 CST
To: Mark Schroeder@ECT
cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: update

Mark,

I want to give you a rundown on what has happened since we spoke nearly 3
weeks ago.

Dan Leff spoke with me this past Friday (March 2).  We had a pleasant
conversation that lasted about 20 minutes.  His suggestion was to speak with
Mark Muller, who he described as the EES "corporate development person".
Dan said he would leave Mark a voice mail message to make him aware of our
conversation.  In turn, I sent Mark a short note with my resume' and will
call him Monday when he is scheduled to return to Houston.  Oddly, I received
a voice-mail from EES Human Resources.  The caller indicated that she was
following up on my discussion with Dick Leibert.. The message from HR was
that   "currently there is no fit within Dan Leff's <organization>" based on
Dick's discussions with unnamed individuals.

Dam also felt I should talk to Lou Pai regarding Xelerator.  I wrote Lou
about 2 weeks ago but have not received any response for my request for a
meeting.  Dan suggested that I try calling but admitted that Lou responds in
his own time.

Steve felt that Sarah Davis, who is responsible for "repositioning" in HR,
would have a feel for Lou's organizational needs as well as other Enron
groups.  When I met with Sarah a week ago Friday, she said she had been
trying without success to talk with Lou.  Sarah and I reviewed my contacts in
Enron to date, which I subsequently provided her in writing.  She felt that
the groups were those that she would suggest and that in most cases the
people were appropriate as well.  Sarah was unable to keep our follow-up
appointment on Wednesday and I do not have any suggestions from her yet for
alternative contacts.  It appears she will be out of town this week and my
request to reschedule the follow-up meeting is pending.

In summary, the frustration and concern I expressed during our recent
conversations has continued.   My understanding is that you plan to be in
Houston next week and I would like to schedule some time to discuss a
resolution of my situation.

Thanks for your help and support.

Mike D.


Sara,
ENA does not have a big balance with BS.  I am taking a look at Enron Credit and will let you know.
sg

Bear Stearns
Balances and positions as of 11/30/01

Enron North America	Cash Balances		Positions

102-06157-1-0	                       -   		750,000	Shares	Kafus Industries, delisted on Canadian Dealing network, ceased trading on 1/18/2001
102-06157-2-8	                    6.78 	USD
102-06159-1-8	      (2,226,347.38)	CAD
102-06159-2-6	       2,226,347.38 	CAD
102-06159-1-8	       1,407,299.23 	USD
102-06159.2.-6	      (1,249,889.52)	USD
 102-06179-2-2 	              1,606.37 	USD
		USD

	          159,022.86 	payable to Enron  North America


Thanks for the phone message.  Glad you made it safely.   It was fun while it
lasted.   I received your avalanche of Inside Texas reports.  I will spend
the afternoon going through those.  Should make for a busy day.

Give me a call when you get settle and let me know how things are going.
Have you told your parents you want airlines miles or points for name brand
merchandise during your stay at the house?

Talk to you later and take care.


That's more or less what I expected.  Good enough to cover us until the 4th.
I'll talk to you all tomorrow.  DF

Steven January
12/31/2000 01:37 PM
To: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lynn Blair/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Stephen
Herber/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michel
Nelson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dave Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Fw: Bushton Processing Facility

FYI. sj
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven January/ET&S/Enron on 12/31/2000
01:48 PM ---------------------------

"jsommer9" <jsommer9@email.msn.com> on 12/31/2000 12:12:59 PM
To: <steven.january@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Fw: Bushton Processing Facility

?
----- Original Message -----
From: jsommer9
To:?
Cc: dkurth@oneok.com ; swinston@oneok.com
Sent: Sunday, December 31, 2000 11:57 AM
Subject: Bushton Processing Facility

This is to inform you ONEOK Field Services will continue to operate the  lean
side dehydration and the rich side processing for the period of January 1
through?Thursday January 4th, 2001, unless the various parties affected by
this decision can come to agreement on economic alternatives to allow the
Bushton facility to remain economical during these difficult times.? Upon
our return on Tuesday, each of the affected parties will need to discuss
possible alternatives.
?
Should you have any questions, please call me at 918-366-8519 (home),
918-588-7501 (work).
?
John L. Sommer


done

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Megan Parker @ ENRON                           11/07/2000 02:01 PM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Duke Exchange Deal

Daren:
I have several months that need to have the demand charges either added or
adjusted.  When Katherine gave you the numbers the first time, there were
some spot deals included in the exchange deals.  The volumes have now been
moved to the correct deals and the demand charges need to be corrected.  I
have listed the changes below.  Let me know if you would like to see the
spreadsheets.

Deal 157278
3/00 Add demand charge of $73,403.47 for excess charge
4/00 Change demand fee from $1,507.56 to $1,966.93
6/00 Change demand fee from $1,129.99 to $359.97

Deal 157288
3/00 Change demand fee from $3,526.98 to $245.82

Thanks,
Megan


Municipal utilities warned
Governor says he'll seize excess electricity if prices don't come down
David Lazarus, Chronicle Staff Writer
Thursday, May 31, 2001
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle
URL: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2001/05/31/MN154796.DTL
Sacramento -- Gov. Gray Davis threatened last night to seize excess power
generated by California's municipal utility districts, which he said have
charged even higher electricity prices than out-of-state generators.
Davis said in an interview with The Chronicle that some municipal utility
districts have charged the state as much as 10 percent more than the average
wholesale cost demanded by private power companies.
The governor's tough talk came as California suffered through a Stage 2 power
alert and faced the prospect of a long, hot summer of rolling blackouts and
skyrocketing electricity prices. So far this year, the state has paid more
than $8.2 billion to buy power for its cash-strapped utilities.
In a variation on his threat to seize power plants from out-of-state
generators if they continue gouging California ratepayers, the governor said
he would use his executive powers to claim excess juice from the locally
owned utilities if they do not lower their prices.
He said he is ready to go to court if they offer resistance.
"We're going to get that power one way or another," Davis said.
Municipal utilities are city-owned power companies. In Northern California,
there are municipal utilities in Alameda, Palo Alto, Redding, Sacramento and
Santa Clara. Los Angeles has the largest municipal utility in the state.
30 DAYS TILL CONTRACT DETAILS
For the first time, the governor also gave a time frame for releasing details
of more than 40 long-term electricity contracts California is signing with
generators since the financial meltdown of the state's two biggest utilities.
He said that after about six more contracts get nailed down, he expects full
details to be made available within 30 days.
Although the contracts involve nearly $40 billion in public funds, Davis and
other state officials have adamantly refused to divulge their contents,
insisting that secrecy is needed to remain competitive during negotiations.
The Chronicle and other media outlets have filed suit for access to the
contracts, arguing that the public has a right to know how its money is being
spent.
RUDE AWAKENING
While going toe-to-toe with the out-of-state generators, the last thing Davis
needed was for municipal utilities -- the home team, as it were -- to emulate
the Texas big boys and dig deep into California's pockets.
Yet the governor's negotiators have been struggling for weeks to convince
municipals that they are obliged to provide power at cost -- which Davis
insisted they are required to do by law.
He met last week with the heads of a dozen municipal utilities and told them
explicitly that he would not tolerate gouging from within the state as
California faces a summer of potential blackouts.
The governor said after the meeting that the municipals had agreed "to make
most of their excess power available this summer . . . at prices
significantly lower than those being charged on the spot market."
Apparently, however, little progress has been made since that declaration.
Davis told The Chronicle last night that he is still "trying very hard to
promote this notion that we're all in this together."
While unwilling to specify which municipal utilities have been most
aggressive in their pricing, and refusing to place a dollar amount on how
much the utilities charged, Davis said he is prepared to seize up to 800
megawatts of output if the they do not change their ways.
Eight hundred megawatts is enough power to light about 800,000 homes.
Representatives of the various municipal utilities could not be reached for
comment, nor could a spokesperson for the California Municipal Utilities
Association in Sacramento.
"I told them that they will either (reduce their prices) voluntarily or
involuntarily," the governor said.
UNCERTAIN FUTURE
It remains to be seen, however, whether the municipal utilities will play
ball. To date, they have shown a firm inclination to go their own way.
In March, Lodi's municipal utility district and a Northern California
municipal utility cooperative that includes Palo Alto, Santa Clara and
Alameda told Pacific Gas and Electric Co. that they will not participate in
rolling blackouts during power shortages.
"I won't arbitrarily screw my customers . . . so 5,000 PG&E customers can
turn on their lights somewhere else," said Alan Vallow, director of the
utility serving Lodi's 58,000 residents.
E-mail David Lazarus at dlazarus@sfchronicle.com.
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle ? Page?A - 1


In cleaning up e:mails, I ran across this one that I had not yet read.  Has
James called and talke with you about Enpower?  Are his concerns in the memo
accurate?  Let me know.  --Sally
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 12/11/2000 11:03 AM
---------------------------

Fernley Dyson
11/29/2000 02:54 AM
To: Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Enpower

Just a heads-up - a long-winded email, but please see highlighted paragraphs.
I find it hard to believe the scenario portrayed here, but stranger things
have happened - will keep you posted.
---------------------- Forwarded by Fernley Dyson/LON/ECT on 29/11/2000 08:44
---------------------------

James New
28/11/2000 13:42
To: Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Port/Market Risk/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Mike Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT, Coralie Evans/LON/ECT@ECT, Fernley
Dyson/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Status update on the issues surrounding Continental Power
volatilities and correlations

As you know for some time we have been trying to get the Continental Power
traders to increase the volatilities they use for valuing their option
portfolio and for use in calculating their VAR as it has been obvious that
the market  has become more volatile but this was not being reflected in
their mark.

In looking at the impacts of this, various other issues came to light.
Firstly it raised issues over the correlation matrix used in the VAR model as
this was way out of date. We have worked with Jitendra and have now put in a
matrix that both the traders, risk and RAC are happy with. Secondly, as you
may be aware, in Portcalc swaptions currently use the volatility input on the
deal ticket and not off any volatility curve.

The current portfolio is 90% swaptions and so this represents a serious issue
for us in that it is not practical to manually change all the volatilities at
the deal ticket level every time the implied voaltilities change. We cannot
use the option functionality as this only values hourly or daily exercise
options and not fixed expiry swaptions or options. We also have not found any
way in Portcalc of valuing Asian options so we are having to 'force' in the
few we have. We have had the Houston based Portcalc IT team work on a 'new'
piece of swaption valuation code but currently it contains a number of
worrying bugs. These are primarily that the proposed code does not take the
correct underlying forward price and uses the volatility of (approximating)
the last day of the underlying rather than the implied volatility of the
underlying.

They are currently being hampered in that they do not have any IT personnel
who have sufficient option knowledge (I understand that the two most
experienced coders resigned to go to another Houston based energy company).
This is extremely worrying and I find it hard to believe that the whole of
Enron's power business is having to use the methodology of inputting the
volatility at the deal ticket level. This will almost certainly mean that
different volatilities are being used in the VAR as are being used to value
the swaption portfolio globally. As well as these issues we have concerns
over the use and accuracy of the smile adjustment in Portcalc (worryingly it
does not seem that you can 'switch' this off). Briefly it seems that Portcalc
calculates the delta used to adjust the volatility by comparing the strike
price to the forward price of the last day of the underlying rather than the
forward price of the underlying itself.

We have engaged London based  IT and are looking at the code we have used in
Power 99 to se if there is a way we can get something done quickly to start
to value all option products off a curve and to be able to book Asian options.

Once we get the above resolved we still have no way or extracting the vega or
gamma risk from Portcalc in it's current state as the information is just no
there (so we are told by IT). The system 'seems' (we cannot be 100% sure
given all the other errors) to produce a vega and gamma P&L number but what
the risk is remains a mystery. Again this is very worrying in that we have
Power option traders all over the world who can't get their underlying vega
or gamma risk position from the global valuation system. We are trying to
work on something manual to draw a line in the sand but I would really like
to know how the American based traders cope as they have this problem
(knowingly or not)  for years. What sign offs were gained for the
implementation of Enpower because it seems to us that using the current
system it is not possible to comply with the Global Risk policy. How do we
validate the inputs to the valuation if we do not know the risk ?

Despite the above we have now persuaded the traders to save out newer higher
volatilities a week ago and you should have seen a large move up in their
VAR. However, as it stands at the moment they are notable to save out a daily
remark as Jitendra is saying that he is not happy with their 'model' / vol
curve generator (I have today asked for a full explanation, details of any
testing etc etc and time lines so we can move to getting over this hurdle).
The swaptions have also not yet had the ticket volatility changed but the
impacts are expected to be positive as we are long volatility.

I would appreciate your comments on the above as it seems that we are pushing
the boundaries here on areas which we really expect to have already been
covered in Houston some time ago and could do with some help. We are having
to use a system which seems to us to have numerous bugs and short comings and
are having to spend an enormous amount of IT time overcoming the inadequacies
of Enpower wich I do not think most people are aware of. Consequently we have
not been able to deliver all the improvements we were required to do in
gaining the increased limits so 3 months ago but I would hope you agree that
it is not for a lack of trying.

Sorry it's so long but if there are any questions or any perceived
inaccuracies in any of the above then please let me know.

James


Alan,

Steve has asked that you update the power point below so that it reflects all
of the "stupid regulatory/legislative decisions" since the beginning of the
year.  Ken wants to have this updated chart in his briefing book for next
week's "Ken Lay Tour" to CA.

He also wants a forward price curve for both gas and power in CA.  Can we get
these three documents by Monday afternoon?


Probably a smart decision. Rick


On Inland -

	an offer in hand is worth four in the wind

Brian

Louise Kitchen
03/16/2001 03:43 PM
To:	Richard Lydecker/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:	Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject:	Re: Inland Resources

Excellent - it has been a great week for you guys.  Three dashes and a handshake deal.

Have a good week-end.

Louise

Richard Lydecker@ENRON
03/16/2001 10:06 AM
To:	Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject:	Inland Resources

Today we negotiated a handshake agreement with Smith Properties to buy out JEDI's position in Inland for $2 million ($1 million net to Enron).  The DASH minimum was $1.25 million ($612,500 net to Enron), the original offer.  Documentation will be simple:  our rep is limited to we own it and we can sell it.  Expect to close and fund next week.

Given the Inland situation and the absence of any foreseeable payment on our preferred, I view this outcome as very favorable.

Brandi Morris' work on this transaction was outstanding.

<Embedded StdOleLink>


Let's see if I get your address right this time....

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/26/2001 05:57
PM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
03/26/2001 05:45 PM
To: priest@yazoopsc.org, mcarroway@watervallery.net, drhunt@watervalley.net
cc: Reagan Rorschach/Enron@EnronXGate, David Fairley/Enron@EnronXGate

Subject: Revised LOI

Gentlemen,

Attached is a clean version of the LOI.  Originals are being sent to Bob and
Marvin by FedX tonight.

Regards,

Kay


Tana,

Attached please find customer list (sent by EBS) for bandwidth trading on
EOL. Please review it and send me your comments. We are planning on launching
the products on May 1st.  Also, I am attaching the GTC that Cynthia Harkness
from EBS put together.

Please let me know if you have any questions

Thank you!

Leonardo Pacheco
ext. 39938


---------------------- Forwarded by Kevin Ruscitti/HOU/ECT on 03/16/2001
01:30 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Martin Cuilla                           03/15/2001 07:53 AM

To: Kevin Ruscitti/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

http://www.tlksolutions.com/family/multimedia.asp


If you could send me the name of the corporate secretary today, so that I
know it when I'm speaking to the judge tomorrow, I'd appreciate that.

**********NOTE**********
The information contained in this email message is intended only
for use of the individual or entity named above.  If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or
agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you
have received this communication in error, please immediately
notify us by telephone (212-310-8000), and destroy the original
message. Thank you.


Bob Hall will have the mid and back office list and Ed McMichael should have the front office.

KK

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wilson, Shona
Sent:	Tuesday, January 08, 2002 4:08 PM
To:	Keiser, Kam
Subject:	RE: estate book

thanks.  Also, is there a list of gas people (front, middle & back office) that will remain with the estate?

thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Keiser, Kam
Sent:	Tuesday, January 08, 2002 4:06 PM
To:	Wilson, Shona
Subject:	RE: estate book

There are a few deals that we have agreed to perform on 100% and Ed McMichael needs to be able to value those deals separately.

KK

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wilson, Shona
Sent:	Tuesday, January 08, 2002 4:04 PM
To:	Keiser, Kam
Cc:	Trevino, Susan
Subject:	RE: estate book

Dear Kam,

what will this book hold?

Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Keiser, Kam
Sent:	Tuesday, January 08, 2002 3:26 PM
To:	Trevino, Susan
Cc:	Wilson, Shona
Subject:	estate book

Susan,

Can you please set up the attached book for the estate.

Thanks

KK

 << File: estate book reqeust.xls >>


Mark,

A reminder to forward Dave Matson and Rich Simon the May Curtailment
information in a format similar to Feb 02.

If you fill out the request and forward to Julie she can put a # on it.  I'm
not sure if there was already a WR for this, but if not and we do additional
work this new one could cover that work.

JD


Todd Menzing called me up a few days ago to ask if he could send a letter to me about what I understand to be his representation of a former Enron employee against us in an HR matter.  I hadn't heard from him, so I followed up today and learned that he had or was going to send a letter to you.

	Menzing is a former V&E associate.  He called me because he knew me from a case in which V&E was representing a party in a commercial litigation matter, and I was representing an Enron employee in a deposition in that matter.

	Maybe there is an easy, no-brainer answer to what appears to be a potential disqualification issue for both Menzing and his firm (remember the mad cow disease of legal ethics? ) but if you were not already aware of Menzing's prior employer, I thought I'd let you know.

	Britt


Late this morning, the House Energy and Commerce Committee adoped the
committee print, as amended, of an energy package that addresses
conservation, clean coal, renewables, hydro, nuclear, and boutique fuels.
The vote was 50 to 5 to report the bill.  Other committees -- Ways and
Means, Science, and Resources -- also moved their energy bills this week.
Thus, the House is on track to consider a merged package before the start
of the August Recess on August 3rd.

As to electricity, during the several days of debate this week both
Chairmen Tauzin and Barton reaffirmed their intention to next move to
electricity issues.  Mr. Barton's staff advised me this morning that the
subcommittee he chairs will hold a hearing on Friday, July 20th on all
electricity issues other than transmission.  While Mr.  Barton has publicly
held out hope of marking up an electricity bill this month, sources on and
off the committee do not see this timetable as realistic.  On the Senate
side, the majority staff is working on an electricity "white paper" that
may be circulated for comment next week.

Below is a recap of action on amendments of interest to Enron:

1.   Last night, on a largely partisan vote (with Democrats Hall, Green and
John voting with the Republicans) the Committee rejected an amendment by
Rep. Jane Harman (D-CA) (that was to have been offered by Rep. Anna Eshoo
(D-CA)) that would have retroactively amended the FERC refund date and
essentially ordered refunds regardless of amounts owed to power sellers.

2.   First thing this morning the Committee, again on a largely partisan
basis (with Democrats Hall, Green, John and Towns), rejected a Waxman
amendment to impose cost-of-service rates on all power in the West (other
than generation added after 1/1/01).  (Originally, Mr. Waxman was going to
offer amendment to impose cost-of-service rates only on those who do not
supply all available power during an emergency, but he ended up offering
basically what he had pursued in subcommittee on the old "Californa Only"
bill.)

3.   The Committee adopted an amendment by Rep. Shadegg to amend the
Natural Gas Act to make it clear that a natural gas "transportation
facility" shall not be added to the National Register of Historic Places
until FERC has abandoned the facility.  Apparently there have been some
instances of "old" pipelines being considered as "historic places" under
federal law.  The House Resources Committee added a similar amendment to
its package yesterday.

4.   By voice vote, the Committee rejected a Waxman Amendment to require
the president to propose and implement a plan to bring U.S. greenhouse
gases down to 1990 levels.  There was strong opposition voiced by many
Republicans and Democrats to this amendment.

5.   By mixed vote of 24 to 29, the Committee defeated a Waxman Amendment
to set cost and performance goals for renewables, including wind power, and
authorize federal funds to assist with commercial project costs (up to 50
percent).


Please see the attached.

****************************************
Peter del Vecchio
Assistant General Counsel
Enron Industrial Markets LLC
1400 Smith Street
Houston, TX 77002

tel:  (713) 853-9875
fax: (713) 646-3393
e-mail:  peter.del.vecchio@enron.com

*****************************************


Was this the last day Tall tood the gas?  I bet so.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Barbe, Robin
Sent:	Wednesday, May 15, 2002 9:43 AM
To:	Germany, Chris
Subject:	FW: gas business on 5/14 for 5/15 gas day

	sold city of tall 2000 for 5/16 @ egan

	sold 10MM to TXU@ cayanosa for 5/16 @ waha gda-$0.05
	the 5/15 cayanosa price is $3.345

	sold the trunkline to reliant at gda-$0.05 for 5/16

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Barbe, Robin
Sent:	Tuesday, May 14, 2002 9:06 AM
To:	Germany, Chris
Subject:	gas business on 5/14 for 5/15 gas day

	sold city of tall 2000 for 5/15 at egan.
	reliant is going to serve at egan.  the gas didn't flow for today's gas day.

	spoke with mike @ white pine.  he indicated that the plant is burning 44 to 45 MM/d and would
	throughout the summer.  we are going to sell 10MM/d until he tells us otherwise.

	sold the gas to lyn at txu.. the price for 5/14 is $3.26.  the price for 5/15 is waha gas daily minus $0.05.
	she said they are swimming in gas and the only way she could buy it for tomorrow is at waha minus $0.05.


You scare me!

-----Original Message-----
From: Christina Rawlings-Curtis [mailto:christina_122367@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 11:55 AM
To: Whitt, Mark
Subject: Ola Baby!

So...you never call, you don't write.  Did the security video scare you off.
  It was just a body double, not the real thing!  No worries, I won't hurt
you.  Call me :)

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/30/99
03:10 PM ---------------------------

Steve W Young
12/23/99 10:03 AM
To: David Weekes/LON/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lee
Munden/LON/ECT@ECT, Soma Ghosh/LON/ECT@ECT, Tomas Valnek/LON/ECT@ECT, Matthew
Nimmo/LON/ECT@ECT, Claire Viejou/LON/ECT@ECT, Karolina Asklund/LON/ECT@ECT,
Esther Gerratt/LON/ECT@ECT, Diana Higgins/LON/ECT@ECT, Sharon
Goodge/LON/ECT@ECT, Claire Dunnett/LON/ECT@ECT, David Crews/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Olivier Herbelot/LON/ECT@ECT, Moises
Woll/LON/ECT@ECT, Anastasia Karabatsos/LON/ECT@ECT, Maria Crespo/LON/ECT@ECT,
Renata Frankova/LON/ECT@ECT, Padmesh Thuraisingham/LON/ECT@ECT, Otto Von
Schwerin/LON/ECT@ECT, Michael Hellermann/LON/ECT@ECT, Bryan
Seyfried/LON/ECT@ECT, Jitendra Patel/LON/ECT@ECT, Ariana Myers/LON/ECT@ECT,
Anjam Ahmad/LON/ECT@ECT, Steven Leppard/LON/ECT@ECT, Benjamin
Parsons/LON/ECT@ECT, Mariano Gentilini/LON/ECT@ECT, Martin
McDermott/LON/ECT@ECT, Omer Muftuler/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Gorte/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Happy Holidays!

All:

Best wishes for a restful and pleasant holiday season!  The time off is well
deserved.

I also wish to express my sincere appreciation for the hard work and
dedication displayed by each of you over the past year.  I'm well aware of
the long hours and individual contributions that are not always widely
known.  However, comments and notes received, particularly during the last
half of 1999, suggest that others not only notice your individual
contributions but have also come to appreciate RAC's value to the overall
organisation.  Your individual efforts during 1999 reflected well on us all.

I look forward to seeing each of you after the holiday season and wish you a
happy and prosperous New Year.

Warmest Regards,

Steve


Car Rental Options for Enron Travelers

Rental car contracts for 2001 have been awarded to:

National Car Rental (Primary) and  Alamo Rent-A-Car (Secondary).

The intent of these agreements is to consolidate and leverage Enron's total car rental spend to achieve the most favorable rates and non-pricing provisions (i.e. insurance).

National Car Rental, due to its service levels, availability and total value proposition, has been awarded Primary status and is recommended as the first choice for Enron travelers' needs.

Alamo Rent-A-Car, a sister company to National, has been awarded a contract reflecting a Secondary status, due to its service levels, availability and low cost solutions.  Alamo is recommended as an alternative to National, where available.

When you rent a vehicle in the United States, (including Puerto Rico) or Canada, the following insurance provisions are included, regardless of rate selected:
1.	L/DW (Loss/Damage Waiver) - This is what is called Comprehensive or Collision on your personal auto. It covers the rental vehicle and pays for any damage to it.
2.	Liability - This covers people and property outside the rental vehicle. For both National and Alamo, the coverage is $100,000 per person, $300,000 per occurrence and $50,000 for property damage.
** IMPORTANT ***
These coverages apply regardless of rate selected, as long as the following contract ID is communicated at the time of reservation and rental is recorded on the transaction rental agreement.  (National -  5000838 Alamo    - #143974)

To enjoy the highest levels of service while renting a vehicle from Enron's preferred suppliers, it is recommended that each traveler enroll in National's and Alamo's preferred traveler programs.  National's Emerald Club membership and Alamo's Quicksilver program are designed to speed the transaction time by providing services such as counter bypass and rapid return.  The enrollment fees for these programs have been waived for Enron travelers.  Enrollment packets will be mailed to the addresses of Enron American Express T&E Cardholders.  You may also find an enrollment form on the Enron Travel Program intranet @ gss.enron.com <http://gss.enron.com/>.

If you have any questions or comments, please contact Jeff Leath at 713-646-6165.


Cindy and Mark:  The Community Relations team has brainstormed ways to
support BEAR during the holiday season, specifically with their bike drive.
One note,  Enron already adopts an entire needy Elementary School for the
holiday seaso, and our employees adopt each child in the school by donating
money, etc. to provide supplies and clothing for the children, so I am a bit
concerned about another big employee drive during the holidays.

However, we have a number of ideas that I will share below, knowing that it
may take some time to schedule a meeting for the three of us:

1.  Partner with 104 KRBE to promote a Bike Drive in partnership with Sun &
Ski Sports (one of KRBE's sponsors).  Enron could pay for the advertising
dollars and Sun & Ski could get shoppers to make donations toward buying
bikes.  Laura Schwartz is exploring KRBE's appetite for something like this.

2.  BEAR/CPS table at our December 1 Big E Cafe which highlights ways for
employees can get involved throughout the community during the holidays.
BEAR could use the opportunity to ask for donations as well as offer
volunteer opportunities.

3.  Partner with the Enron Cycling Club to donate bikes - leverage their
connections with local bike stores.  These employees might be more likely to
want to donate.

2.  Utilize Matching Dollars (up to $15,000 per employee annually) if Mark or
other employees are interested in contributing.  Additionally, if Mark or
other employees volunteer with BEAR, using VIP dollars (up to $2500) to pay
for bikes.

Please let me know your thoughts, so that we can pursue some of these
opportunities.

Elyse


Hi Jim,

I'll make the arrangements for Henry Hu, and will let him know the
details.

Attached is the RSVP log to date for the November 2 meeting.  I've asked
George Kryder and Betsy Whitaker (the two we've not heard from yet) to
advise me of their plans ASAP.  The meeting looks like a "go", though
Tom Green, Anne McNamara and Joe Hubach won't be able to attend (Hubach
has an all day meeting but hopes to join us for drinks and dinner).

Anne McNamara wrote kindly in her RSVP that "with this small a group
perhaps we could seek a convenient time before scheduling meetings in
the future".

I'll send you for your review no later than Monday (1) a revised
proposed "organizational plan" (the written smorgasborg of options we
discussed last month), (2)a draft agenda for the meeting, and (3) a
draft cover memo from you to the ExComm members.  I recommend that we
send the approved versions of these on Tuesday or Wednesday via email.

From the press I'm reading every day, it sounds like you must be pretty
busy!

Let me know if there is anything else you want me to do in preparation
for the upcoming meeting.

Incidentally, we had an outstanding meeting of the IOGEC Executive
Committee last week.  I'll fill you in later.

David

-----Original Message-----
From: Derrick Jr., James [mailto:James.Derrick@ENRON.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 4:59 PM
To: Henry Hu <hhu@mail.law.utexas.edu>@ENRON
Cc: David Winn
Subject: RE: Nov. 2 Mtg of Exec Comm of Inst for Law & Tech

Dear Professor Hu, thank you for your message.  Your participation by
telephone, for whatever portion of your afternoon might be free, would
be very welcome.  I currently plan to be in Austin for the UT Law School
Foundation Board meeting and related matters on November 9 and 10.
Perhaps our paths will cross there.  All the best.  Jim Derrick

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Henry Hu <hhu@mail.law.utexas.edu>@ENRON
> Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 8:45 AM
> To:	Derrick Jr., James
> Cc:	jdavidellwanger@swlegal.org; dwinn@swlegal.org
> Subject:	Nov. 2 Mtg of Exec Comm of Inst for Law & Tech
>
> Dear Mr. Derrick:
>
> 	Thank you for including me in this venture.  It promises to be
> fun and
> useful.  Unfortunately, in terms of the November 2nd meeting, a
> faculty
> candidate I'm primarily responsible for is coming through the law
> school
> the same day.  He is giving a colloquium late morning/early afternoon
> and
> my wife and I are hosting the dinner for him and his wife that
> evening.
> So, especially given the post-9/11 logistics, it doesn't seem
> practical for
> me to come to Dallas for this meeting.  One possibility might be for
> me to
> participate by phone for a portion of the afternoon meeting and I
> would be
> happy to do so.  But given the nature and length of the meeting, this
> probably doesn't make sense - please let me know what you think.
>
> 	Best regards.
>
> 							- Henry Hu
> Henry T. C. Hu
> Allan Shivers Chair in the Law of Banking and Finance
> University of Texas School of Law
> 727 East Dean Keeton Street
> Austin, TX 78705
> U.S.A.
>
> office phone:  512-232-1373
> e-mail:  hhu@mail.law.utexas.edu

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
(or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender
or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not
create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron
Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other
party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by
estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************
 - ResponseLog as of 10-24-01.wpd


Start Date: 12/29/01; HourAhead hour: 1;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001122901.txt
###Cannot locate a Preferred or Revised_Preferred Schedule that matches the FINAL Individual Interchange Schedule.  Unable to assign deal number.
###Cannot locate a Preferred or Revised_Preferred Schedule that matches the FINAL Individual Interchange Schedule.  Unable to assign deal number.
###Cannot locate a Preferred or Revised_Preferred Schedule that matches the FINAL Individual Interchange Schedule.  Unable to assign deal number.
###Cannot locate a Preferred or Revised_Preferred Schedule that matches the FINAL Individual Interchange Schedule.  Unable to assign deal number.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	CustomerNotices, WGPHOU [mailto:WGPHOU.CustomerNotices@Williams.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, January 30, 2002 11:40 AM
Subject:	Market Area IT Availability - February 1, 2002

January 30, 2002

To:	Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation Customers
	and Shippers

Re:	Market Area IT Availability - February 1, 2002

The available interruptible transportation service (IT and
secondary FT) on Transco for pipeline day Friday, February
1, 2002 and continuing until further notice is summarized
as follows:

Tier I and Tier II (only Sta. 90 through
Sta. 180 affected)				100	MDt/day

South Virginia Lateral Compressor
Station 167						144 	MDt/day

Tier III (Station 180 through East)		0   	MDt/day

Leidy at Centerville Regulator Station
(Only deliveries downstream of
Centerville regulator affected)		OPEN 	MDt/day

Leidy at Station 520 (Only deliveries
Downstream (east) of Station 520
affected)						OPEN	MDt/day

Linden Regulator Station
(Located in Union County, New Jersey)	50 	MDt/day

Mobile Bay Lateral			   	162 	MDt/day

The above available interruptible transportation service
refers to deliveries into the affected area that have
receipts upstream of the bottleneck or affected area.

If you have any questions, please call John McGrath at (713)
215-2514 or Donna L. Cooper at (713) 215-4061.

J. E. McGrath
Manager
Operations Planning


Okay - I won't be able to get out of here before 5 p.m., so 6 p.m. might be
better. Also, I am car-free these days, and I completely forgot you wanted to
meet east of the river. Would it be too much trouble to meet in NE - that's
where I live, and there aren't any buses directly from SE to NE,
unfortunately. Let me know if this works for you. Sorry for the hassle!

Kate

John Enders <jenders@ap.org> on 04/25/2001 12:48:50 PM
To: Kate.Symes@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Re: a beer

Sure. I know busy.
I suggest the Lucky Labrador Brewing Co., on S.E. Hawthorne at 9th.
I can do 4 p.m., or 6 p.m. Whichever is best for you.
John

Kate.Symes@enron.com wrote:

> So sorry for not getting back to you sooner - it seems I've acquired two
> new jobs in addition to the full time schedule I already kept. But tonight
> still works for me - just let me know when and where.
>
> Kate
>
> John Enders <jenders@ap.org> on 04/25/2001 10:28:41 AM
>
> To:   Kate.Symes@enron.com
> cc:
>
> Subject:  Re: a beer
>
> Are we on, or off?
>
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                   Name: $RFC822.eml
>    $RFC822.eml    Type: Microsoft MHTML Document 5.0 (message/rfc822)
>               Encoding: base64