yes  (Kaye - please place on my calendar)

Suzanne Adams
09/17/99 04:15 PM
To: Edward Ondarza/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Crane/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert J
Pratel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard T Robinson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Robert E Anderson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ed Quinn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Moulton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Scheuer/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Cummings/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Bryan Burnett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Croom/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Jure/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Saverance/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott M Shields/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Harbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Cordesman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Palmer/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Roy Lipsett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Bruch/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Kim/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike
Horning/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas Mark Poole/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elliot
Bonner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carla Brooks/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Elliott/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan
Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marie
Heard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kaye Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Taffy Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: PULP & PAPER LUNCHEON MEETING

The above-referenced meeting is still scheduled for Friday, October 1, 1999,
but the time has changed.  In order for the people in London to participate,
we have moved the start time to 11:00 a.m., and the meeting will be held in
EB30C1.  Lunch will be served.

Please let me know via email if you will attend, so we'll have an accurate
headcount.


I don't remember my userid and password for the e-mail 4-life


Hi Hoon,
How is your day going? I hope you are having a good day, I miss you.
Call me when you get a chance ok?
Love
me


Of course your Dad would be invited to anything we do, but if you'd rather
spend the
time alone with him that weekend we could always make it another weekend.
The only
problem with the 12th is that we'll be consumed with the move the entire
weekend.  Let
me know what works for you.  We're flexible after the 12th.

KR


Here's what I found.  Pls let me know if I can help you with anything.  I
checked on the bonds that we spoke with you about earlier.  The call date was
in August so I just passed on it.  These look pretty good.

Thanks, Julie
 - kaminsky2.doc


i spoke to her yesterday.  if she doesn't get you an interview with that guy
she is going to get you one later.  game at tim or val's.


If you are interested in attending this CLE course tomorrow, please contact
Melba Trevino at x57664 as soon as possible.

----- Forwarded by Dina Snow/Corp/Enron on 03/05/2001 04:49 PM -----

	Melba Trevino/ENRON@enronXgate
	03/05/2001 04:33 PM

		 To: Dina Snow/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: CLE - International Swaps and Derivatives Products

It is at the Four Seasons Hotel here in Houston.  Registration starts at 8:00
AM with a continental breakfast.  Let me know if one of your attorneys
attend.  All that needs to be done is that the mention that they are taking
Julia Chin's place.
 -----Original Message-----
From:  Trevino, Melba
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 3:11 PM
To: Mintz, Jordan; Bahlmann, Gareth; Ephross, Joel; Karathanos, Gina
Subject: CLE - International Swaps and Derivatives Products

Tomorrow, March 6, 2001 at 8:00 AM ISDA will be hosting a CLE Workshop at the
Four Seasons Hotel in Houston.  I have already paid for Julia however she
will be unable to attend.  Therefore, if you are interested in attending
please let me know ASAP.

Thanks,
Melba Trevino
713/345-7664
Fax: 713-853-9252
EB 2084a


Peter:

I think your collective e-mails constitute the legal risk memo.  What do you
think the legal risk rating ought to be?

Regards,

Mark

	Peter Keohane
	11/22/2000 10:28 AM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Greg Johnston/CAL/ECT@ECT, Derek
Davies/CAL/ECT@ECT, Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Plan B Auction - Need for Approvals ?

Mark, thanks for the voice mail.  In terms of a risk memo, I agree that one
should not be necessary as in many respects this can be characterized as
normal course trading within position limits under a standardized Master
Agreement and without an outlay of capital, but hopefully the following
(together with my memo from last night - copy attached) suffices to the
extent a risk memo is required.

In terms of unusual risks:

1.  We do not have any rights to collateral under the proposed Master.
However, the counterparty is the Balancing Pool which is essentially
Government of Alberta credit risk.  Derek Davies is I believe dealing with
Credit to resolve credit issues.  In fact, I believe the Balancing Pool is
taking significant risk as it is selling the power firm under a Master which
does not match up to the interruptible nature of the PPAs it holds.

2.  The Balancing Pool will be secured under the Master by a parental
guarantee of Enron Corp. and has a somewhat discretionary right to call for
collateral from us under the Master if there is a material change in Enron
Corp.'s creditworthiness.

3.  It is a requirement of the auction that we will have entered into
back-to-back physical hedges for 70% of the volume we acquire, and we are
currently working at putting those deals in place conditional on us bidding
and being successful in the auction.  Penalties can be imposed if 70% of the
volume purchased is not properly hedged.

4.  As we are dealing with the Government of Alberta, we always run the risk
(as we are somewhat seeing now with respect to the Sundance PPA we acquired
in the first auction) that they can change the auction rules, the market
rules or the legislation in ways that are adverse to us.  In terms of the
auction rules, as with the first auction, they could be better drafted, but
our fundamental concern will be to make sure that it is clear that if we post
a bid deposit and do not bid that we get the deposit back, and to ensure that
the rules are clear enough that we are comfortable that we are in complete
control of whether or not we can comply with the rules.

Peter.

(Milly, sorry for not copying you on my first memo - see below.)
---------------------- Forwarded by Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT on 11/22/2000 08:52
AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources
	Canada Corp.

	From:  Peter Keohane                           11/21/2000 06:38 PM

To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Derek Davies/CAL/ECT@ECT, Greg
Johnston/CAL/ECT@ECT
Subject: Plan B Auction - Need for Approvals ?

Mark, as I have mentioned to you the Plan B Alberta Power Auction is
scheduled for Nov 29/00, under which Enron Canada can purchase for one-year
terms, in each of three successive years, up to approximately 300MW/year #1;
130MW/year #2; and 65MW/year #3, of the unsold PPA capacity that reverted
back to the Balancing Pool of Alberta following the first auction last
August.  The bid qualification documentation needs to be in Friday and US
Thanksgiving is Thursday/Friday.  I wanted you to be aware of this, and
determine from you if any corporate approvals need to be obtained.

Firstly, Derek Davies/John Zufferli will only be bidding to the extent
authorized by Lavo.

Secondly, bid qualification commits us to the rules of the auction, the forms
of documentation to govern both the auction and the purchase if we are
successful, and requires a bid deposit (approximately C$6.5MM), but does not
obligate us to bid and, provided we comply with the auction rules, the Bid
Deposit will be returned after the auction.

Thirdly, unlike the PPA auction the risks are much less significant in terms
of volume and term.  In terms of documentation, if we are the successful
bidder, we will be buying power from the Balancing Pool under a physical
Master, which seems to be a Canadianized version of the EEI Master and which,
although not entirely to our liking, is generally satisfactory.

Fourthly, the position will, I understand, be managed in the power trading
book within approved position limits.  Note:  The nominal amounts owing (i.e.
no up front payment is required) on an unhedged basis for the entire 300MWs
in year #1 would be something like C$260MM, assuming a C$100/MW purchase
price.  Year #2 would be C$114MM and year #3 would be C$57MM.

Given the nature of the transaction, the short time that we have with US
Thanksgiving intervening, and numerous other demands, I do not believe that a
DASH, Risk Memo and/or Board Approval is necessary, but please let me know.

I will leave you a brief voice mail to follow-up.

Peter.


FYI

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mary Grace Landrum <lan-link@swbell.net>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 10:11 AM
To:	Armstrong, Julie
Subject:	System Security - November 1

Julie,
Here is the updated  announcement with confirmed presenters and underwriters.   I will let  you know as soon as we hear from Stan's assistant.  We have asked Jerry  Halverson for an alternate, if Stan is unavailable.  Vicky Bailey will  speak about DOE expectations and concerns.  Glynn Blanton will address  expectations and concerns from a state perspective.

Mary Landrum

CTN  Live

"A  Heightened Look at the Security of Our  System"
November  1, 2001
8:30-10:00 a.m. MT,  9:30-11:00 a.m. CT,  10:30 a.m. - 12 noon ET

"Now that we know what the 'new normal' is, we have work to  do"
Earl Nye, Chairman, TXU  Corp.

 Target  Audience:
Senior Executives, Team Leaders and management from  Operations, Human Resources, Engineering, Safety, Environmental, Communications,  and Regulatory
 Deliverables:
Persons viewing this Special  Program will have a better understanding of the following:
Can the industry effectively secure the massive  infrastructure within the United States?   If we cannot, what methodology do we utilize to determine and address  our greatest risks?
What is the REAL threat to the gas  infrastructure?  Do we understand  what companies are trying to protect against?
How to effectively evaluate your current system  security.
Proactive steps in creating alliances with homeland  security, law enforcement and trade associations
Our 'new normal' will not be like the last?but what is  the proper level of awareness we should have?  Should we look to foreign companies as  our 'new normal' what may already be their standard operating  procedures?
We may need to sacrifice "convenience" for the benefit  of better security, but what does that mean?
To increase security we will need to share less system  information as widely?what information should we begin to hold more  closely?

 The broadcast will be aired in three segments.  Each segment will follow the  model:
 Preparedness, Prevention,  Protection, Response & Recovery

 Physical Assets  	 Human Assets  	 Regulatory Response &  Expectation
 Risk  Assessment  Existing System  Security  Proactive  Measures 	 The Pre-Event  Process  During the Crisis or  Event  Post Event  Process 	 Increased Facilities  Security  New  Guidelines  Rate  Relief

Panelists  include:
                 Mr. Earl Nye, Chairman, TXU Corporation
                 The Honorable Linda Breathitt, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Invited)
                 Ms Vicky Bailey, Assistant Secretary, Policy & International Policy,  Department of Energy
                 Ms. Stacy Gerard, Office of Pipeline Safety (Invited)
                 Mr. Glynn Blanton, Chief of Pipeline Safety, Tennessee Regulatory  Authority
                 Dr. Karl Seger, Author & Terrorism Expert, Associated Corporate  Consultants
                 Mr. Mike McGonagill, Vice President-U.S. Operations, Alliance  Pipeline
                 Mr. David Jones, Vice President-Eastern Operations, El Paso Pipeline  Group
                 Mr. Bill Burton, Senior Vice President-HR, Williams Gas  Pipeline
                 Mr. Lewis Griffith, Director-Corporate Security, Reliant  Energy
                 Mr. Gary Forman, Chief Security Officer, Columbia Gas Transmission, a  NiSource Co.

  Underwriting  Sponsors:
              Alabama Gas Corp                                Duke Energy Corp.
             AGL Resources                                     Reliant Energy Entex
             Columbia Gas Transmission                 Southern Natural Gas Company
             Columbia Gulf Transmission

 SITE  registration  Fees:
                  CTN Subscribers                   $495.
                 SGA Members                       $595.
                 Non-SGA Members              $695.

To register for  this Broadcast, contact:
Nadine Fred
CTN, the Energy Network
972-620-4017            nfred@southerngas.org

Mary Landrum
CTN, the Energy  Network
713-722-8307            mlandrum@southerngas.org

[IMAGE]

 - clip_image002.gif
 - SystemSecurity01.doc


i can draw out the graphs and know out many of the red items on this one tomorrow also when i meet with monica

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	McDaniel, Kirk
Sent:	Saturday, November 24, 2001 11:50 AM
To:	sheri.a.righi@accenture.com; Quigley, Dutch
Cc:	O'rourke, Tim; Frolov, Yevgeny; monica.l.brown@accenture.com; donald.l.barnhart@accenture.com; Allen, Phillip K.
Subject:	Re: Futures and Options Topics - Dutch Quigley

Team
Here are my comments on Options (See attachment below).

We need examples of:
Cap (Call Option)
Floor
Collar

In addition we need information on Financial option.

Accenture, in all the documents can we have roll over capabilities on the bold words and instead of Click here because time is of essence in our culture and having the learner have to go to the glossary or click for a pop up creates opportunities for disengagement.

 << File: Options Topic- V1.doc Kirk Comments.doc >>


I went by some houses last night . . .

This house was by far the nicest and best bang for your buck, but in a
suspect neighborhood - it looks like they are building a lot of townhouses
close though
check it out . . .
http://www.har.com/search/condo/indexdetail.cfm?mlnum=203161

These were nice too - more contemporary though . . .
http://www.har.com/search/condo/indexdetail.cfm?mlnum=389305

We should probably go look at these on Sunday.

Love,
e


J-We bought 15,000/d from a 3rd party for 11/10 through 11/14. Please pull
from our TCO Pool #69593. Our daily forcasted noms will reflect this.
C- Should we do this at GD 10-14 rather than IF FOM?


Further to our conversation,  attached is an Amendment to the existing GISB
concerning confirming party.   Please print two and sign if in agreement and
forward to my attention at the location below.   I will provide you with an
original for your records.

Regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


This is cute
----- Forwarded by Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT on 03/27/2001 01:29 PM -----

	Maryanne.Lyons@bakerbotts.com
	03/27/2001 12:01 PM

		 To: dan.lyons@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW:

 This looks like Frank with a kitten (be sure and play it to see the
streaming video).

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Clements, Julie
> Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 11:47 AM
> To: Chichester, Ronald; Dedek, Angelia; Lyons, Maryanne
> Subject:
>
> You cat people should enjoy this....
>
>
>  <<teasingcat.mpeg>>

 - teasingcat.mpeg


You don't need to lose weight!

     I am sure you are quite comfortable being
sluggish and slow and having a "lack of energy".

     I am sure those lonely nights give you a moment
of peace and quite from your  hectic days.

     You don't need to lose weight.  After all you probably
have only another 5 or 6 years to live.  You don't need
to lose weight, you can always find more material for
the clothes you wear. Another size doesn't really matter.

     But, oh the good food, that's the thing.   You want to
eat more than you possibly need and make certain
you don't exercise.  Because the bigger you become
the more benefit your life has.

If all of that above is true, then don't respond to this email.

     But if it isn't, if any of those things above concern you,
if while you are sitting at your computer you wonder
why you aren't  out dancing, or you wonder why you
are there instead of on a trip to somewhere.  Then respond to
this email and learn more about HGH.

     Nothing works unless you wish it to.  There is no easy road.
But the product I have will encourage you to keep on the ones that work.

     HGH, in thousands of clinical studies, has been proven to increase your
strength, energy, memory, and sex drive!

     Plus, lose fat, water weight and reduce wrinkles.

Also, and most importantly feel:
     Happy and Alive.

For more information, visit us now at

www.TheClinic4HGH.com

Thanks!

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

          =======   End of message ========

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

This is a one time mailing and you will not
receive another email unless you purchase
product or request more information.

The message you have received
is in full compliance with U.S. Federal
requirements for commercial email under
bill S.1618 Title lll, Section 301,
Paragraph (a)(2)(C) passed by the 105th U.S.
Congress and is not considered illegal
since it includes a remove mechanism.
This message is not intended for residents in the
states of CA, NC, NV, RI, TN, VA & WA. If you
have received this message in error, please
hit reply and type remove in the subject line.
Screening of addresses has been done to the best
of our technical ability.

 If you do not wish to receive further
mailings, please click reply and enter
remove in the email subject line.

The above statements are  provided to be
in compliance with commercial email laws.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>


Cris,  Attached are redline versions of revisions to the Lost Creek Capacity
Allocation and Expansion Agreement which we had discussed some time back.
The changes were made to accommodate several goals, but the one that you
should have any concern with are in Section 2.3 and the definition of Third
Party Gathering Agreement.


What???  Why did he call you?  NGPL related or Trucking P&L related?


fyi
----- Forwarded by Shari Stack/HOU/ECT on 05/30/2000 06:41 PM -----

	Rogelio L?pez Velarde <rlopezv@lvha.com.mx>
	05/30/2000 07:20 PM
	Please respond to Rogelio L?pez Velarde

		 To: Peggy Banczak/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: "Sean McCoy" <Sean.McCoy@lvha.com.mx>, Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT, "Jaime
Williams" <Jaime.Williams@enron.com>
		 Subject: Financial Trading Co.

See attachment.

The information contained herein may be confidential and/or privileged. This
information is intended to be reviewed only by the individual or the entity
to which is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail message is not the
intended recipient or a representative of the intended recipient you are
hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this e-mail
message or the information contained herein is prohibited. If you have
received this e-mail message in error, please immediately notify the sender
and return this communication to the sender.
 - att1.htm
 - Memo new language.doc


Is John also responsible for brokerage/futures?  Will he run through Ted?
Will we keep copies?
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 08/18/2000 08:16 AM -----

	John Viverito@ENRON
	08/18/2000 03:37 AM

		 To: Darren Delage/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jonathan Whitehead/AP/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: brokerage agreements

Darren-

Currently, we have three ISDA Master Agreements under process.  Our potential
counterparties are Mitsui Marine and Fire Insurance Co., The Industrial Bank
of Japan and Sanwa Bank Ltd.  We have produced these documents based on the
credit worksheets prepared in Houston and in conjunction with Baker &
McKenzie, Tokyo.  Mark Taylor is reviewing the drafts prior to presenting
them to the potential counterparties.

I am not aware of any brokerage arrangements to which Enron Japan Corp. is a
party.  I note that I have copied Jonathan Whitehead on this correspondence,
as he may be able to provide insight regarding plans for entering into such
arrangements.

Best regards,

John

	Darren Delage@ECT
	08/17/2000 12:40 PM

		 To: John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: brokerage agreements

Thanks for your response John, I think it provides the clarification that we
need to move forward.
I have one further question for you relating to current ISDA/exchange
agreements that we have in place in Enron Japan.

Below are all exisiting ISDA and brokerage agreements that Financial trading
currently has in place. Does Enron Japan have any ISDA/broker agreements in
place that we can use for the purpose of executing financial trades?
(perhaps with some of the names on the attached list?)If so, do you know what
sort of credit has been extended and/or whether there is netting versus other
commodity books or dedicated activity credit?

If we do not have any agreements in place which would allow us to conduct
trades, do you know who I should contact regarding necessary documentation?

Sincerely,
Darren

---------------------- Forwarded by Darren Delage/HOU/ECT on 08/17/2000 12:12
PM ---------------------------
From: Sara Shackleton on 08/17/2000 11:43 AM
To: Darren Delage/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Laurel Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: brokerage agreements

Darren:  Laurel mentioned that you were interested in existing/pending
brokerage/futures agreements.  Attached are our most recent matrices by Enron
company.  ALL of these agreements are negotiated by legal and must be
executed by the business unit (VP or higher) and Ted Murphy.  Sheila Glover
always sends a request and explanation for new account to legal, compliance
and Ted Murphy.  Legal keeps a comprehensive listing by Enron company in an
effort to avoid confusion.  Legal updates authorized trader lists and trading
resolutions.  Let me know if you have any questions.  Sara


I don't know, probably 5.  But if you're leaving earlier, I can walk down with you.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 12:19 PM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

ok what time are you leaving

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 12:18 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:

Okay, I do need to get my pager today


Team,
can you resend your text document to Vince ASAP.
We could open your spreadsheet OK, but not the document.
Vince's contact information is on the attached email below.

Thanks
Jason

---------------------- Forwarded by Jason Sokolov/HOU/ECT on 05/04/2001 05:32
PM ---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski
05/04/2001 05:29 PM
To: monfan@rice.edu
cc: vkaminski@aol.com, Jason Sokolov/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Term papers

Felix,

Please, resend me the term papers of your group, each as  a separate file.
Please send it to my AOL address as well as work address.

My AOL address is  vkaminski@aol.com

My home phone number is 281 367 5377.

Vince


Following last week's meeting, here is my recommendation on how to proceed with SCE.

1.	Form Enron Negotiation Team

	My recommendation is to use the same team we used with PG&E + Jeff Dasovich.  My understanding was that Lisa M. was the lead negotiator - I would not change this.  Jeff should only be there to make introductions.

2.	Meet & Confer (10/29)

	Sue Mara and Jeff Dasovich will listen and report back to everyone on what happens.

3.	Reformed Stipulation

	I would propose that we take a wait and see approach to this document.  Based on Dasovich's idea to get together with SCE on Thursday, maybe let this ride.

4.	Meeting

	My understanding is that (Jeff D. please correct) SCE can meet with us this Thursday.  Can everyone make it that needs to be there?  Probably meet in California.  We should put the laundry list on the table.

Please let me know what else we need to discuss or if anyone disagrees.

Thanks,

Jim


This summarizes the near term delivery milestones for the Position Manager
functionality within Thunderball.

The first release of  Position Manager    ( Phase I )  within the Thunderball
Moneypenny application is as follows for Liquids, Crude, Products and Coal  :

? Houston  UAT  (User Acceptance Test)  -- Week of May 7 through week of May
14 . User acceptance test started today and is going well.

? London UAT    (User Acceptance Test)    -- Week of May 14 through May 21

? Singapore UAT  (User Acceptance Test)      -- Week of May 21

Phase I full release will be complete by May 31 (all trader desktops)
The target is to deliver the following Phase 1 and Phase 2 functionality
through the May / June time frame in a series of iterative releases.

Phase I includes (Liquids, Crude, Products, Coal) :

? Option Specific Views
? Spread Option Position (although not real-time updates)

Phase II Includes:

? User configured total columns/rows
? Counterparty filter
? Notional/Exposure calc toggle
? More meaningful labels for curves
? Geographical grouping of curve codes
? Predictive roll off
*with option to incorporate into current position
? Volumetric trading limits
? Roll risk

As an FYI -- We are in the process of developing a management level view of
all EGM delivery expectations and plans for the next 12 months. This will be
ready by the end of this month. We will also be developing a weekly report
that will summarize status against planned milestones for Thunderball.
Eventually this will be published for the other key projects that we will be
starting for EGM.

Let me know if you have questions or concerns.


Nick:
No, but to my knowledge  he does not have the new draft unless you or someone
in credit gave it to him.  I never heard back from anyone and I have not sent
it out to him.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

	Nick Ernst/ENRON@enronXgate
	06/06/2001 02:54 PM

		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: AK Feedback

Did you get any feedback from AK's lawyer yet?


Attached please find the nipsco changes for the 20th.  Please note that there
is a change on the ANR leg from 200 @ ANR/Ft Wayne to 141 @ ANR/Ft Wayne and
59 @ ANR/Michigan City.   This will balance your Pool B and make you take the
withdrawal on Pool A.   Otherwise you would be injecting on Pool B and
withdrawing on Pool A.

Total Demand:    Nominated  Difference

Pool A  936   859   (77)
Pool  B  141   141       0

Total  1,077   1,000   (77)

Also, please note that all changes for 4/21 thru 4/24 are due to be nominated
on 4/20/00 since Nipsco is closed for the holiday on Friday so if you are
increasing or decreasing volumes over the weekend I need to have those
numbers no later than 9:30 tomorrow morning.

Thanks,

Cora


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/06/2001 06:49 PM -----

	Christopher F Calger@ECT
	02/06/2001 06:38 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: CDWR Summary for Ken Lay

I made one adjustment - Pastoria offer is $58.80.


I got it I'll call you at home tonight

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Smith, Foster" <Foster.Smith@ElPaso.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 1:49 PM
To:	May, Larry
Subject:

Trying to get you and Mike together after work for a drink.  I'm running out
of time, and I would think you guys are too?  At least let me know if you
got this.

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender.
******************************************************************


Hey buddy.  We are having all sorts of problems with St 30, 90% internal.
You should try to sell to someone else if possible.  Maybe Williams??


---------------------- Forwarded by Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT on 01/16/2001
01:01 PM ---------------------------

Dustin Collins
01/16/2001 10:17 AM
To: Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Chris Gaskill/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Fundamentals Group - Associate Rotation

Hunter - per our conversation the other day, I am finishing up my first
rotation with the LNG group and am very interested in rotating into your
Fundamentals group.  I would appreciate the opportunity to meet with you to
further discuss such opportunities.  Please let me know what time is good for
you.

Regards,

Dustin


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/06/2001
05:21 PM ---------------------------

Pinnamaneni Krishnarao
04/05/2001 01:24 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Gutenberg presentation - revised

FYI.


The GD article today regarding the proposed decision is a pretty good Readers
Digest version of the order.  Susan and I spoke with Jeff Dasovich and Mark
Baldwin yesterday, and the consensus of those conversations was that
Transwestern should remain involved in this proceeding only for purposes of
implementation/documentation.  Jeff offered that he might send a letter to
Governor Gray's office expressing both dismay and indignation that the CPUC
didn't complete their task and warning of the adverse outcome to California
ratepayers if these more modest reforms are approved.  He may ask the other
Comprehensive Settlement parties to join in signing the letter.  Susan, Mark
and I spoke about this idea later, and we've got some reservations about TW's
role in admonishing the CPUC.   We should probably wait to see this letter
first before committing to anything.

Bilas draft cautious toward SoCal competition
Mindful of the current chaos over energy markets in the state, California
Public Utilities
Commissioner Richard Bilas has recommended the adoption of a much more
moderate
approach to promoting competition on Southern California Gas, (SoCal) system.
In his draft decision, Bilas advised the commission to reject the unbundling
of intrastate
transmission and instead approve the first settlement filed in the case, the
less far-reaching
Interim Settlement (IS), submitted in December 1999. SoCal, San Diego Gas and
Electric and
other parties filed two more settlements after the IS, reaching a
comprehensive agreement in
April this year.

But since then, gas and power prices skyrocketed in the state, prompting a
consumer
backlash and giving competition a bad name.  The draft language notes that
the first interim
settlement was supported by more customer groups than the later agreements.
Recent events &lead us to conclude that the centerpiece of this
investigation, the unbundling
of intrastate transmission and the implementation of a system of firm,
tradable intrastate transmission rights, should be delayed,8 according to the
draft order.  &This unbundling is the basis of the [comprehensive settlement]
and we cannot approve it. We do not, however, wish to commit to paralysis
until 2006, as the [post-interim settlement] would have us do. Accordingly,
we believe Californians are better served at this juncture by the adoption,
with modifications, of the IS.8

The biggest change to the IS in the draft is the rejection of an automatic
capacity expansion
by SoCal at Wheeler Ridge, Calif., with rolled-in rates if certain criteria
are met.  El Paso
Energy had objected to the provision in the IS that would have allowed SoCal
to automatically
expand capacity at Wheeler Ridge by 100 million cfd if a certain number of
curtailments oc-curred.
El Paso objected to forcing all shippers to pay for the expansion at Wheeler
when only certain customers would benefit.
The draft says SoCal can file a separate application for the Wheeler Ridge
expansion, but approval would be conditioned on a traditional hearing process.

The draft decision would also:
 End SoCal,s current &windowing8 process, which limits shippers, ability to
change nominations
for deliveries between receipt points on the system. It is replaced with an
announced
daily calculation of capacity available at each receipt point;
 Establish Hector Road as a formal receipt point for nominations;
 Institute an operational flow order (OFO) procedure. Provides a forum for
more changes
in OFO procedures if excessive OFOs are made;
 Set up &pools8 of gas on the SoCal transmission system that are intended to
increase the
liquidity of gas trading;
 Make changes to balancing rules, while retaining the current 10% monthly
imbalance
tolerance;
 Make SoCal,s own gas acquisition unit subject to the same balancing rules
and penalties
as all other shippers;
 Allow some limited imbalances trading, as well as the right to assign and
reassign unbundled
storage contract in a secondary market, with a SoCal electronic bulletin
board set up
for it;
 Unbundle from core transportation rates the storage capacity cost exceeding
that required
for core minimum reliability; and
 Provide for rate recovery of up to $3.5 million in implementation costs.

In addition, the draft would unbundle core interstate transportation from
rates, eliminate
core contribution to noncore interstate transition cost surcharges, eliminate
the core subscription
option as well as the caps for core aggregation programs.  The threshold for
participating in
core aggregation is reduced, and billing options are offered to core
aggregators.

Bilas, draft also warned that the commission may come back in two years to
open another
investigation into gas competition, taking into account any changes in market
conditions.
Bilas gave a little more insight into his decision in the text of the draft.
&The cost of gas as a commodity has vastly increased at the border, showing a
differential
between the basin and border prices that is more than the cost of transport
and related services;
we question whether there will be an opportunity for discounting by marketers
if more competition is allowed,8
Bilas wrote in the draft decision.  &With half the state already committed to
a
restructured competitive natural gas industry, it suddenly seems as if the
benefits of such re-
structuring to enhance competition are speculative, particularly at this
time.  With one leg in the
water, the current has switched direction and it will be difficult, if not
foolhardy, to reach our
goals by forging ahead.

&We choose to take a cautious approach again,8 the draft continues. &Rather
than proceeding
to unbundle transmission in Southern California now, we approve, with
modifications, the settle-
ment suggesting smaller steps towards a competitive market. Additionally, we
unbundle core
interstate transmission and once again urge the Legislature to pass consumer
protection legisla-
tion aimed at unregulated marketers while we facilitate growth in core
aggregation programs.8
The CPUC would not rule out the unbundling of intrastate transmission and
other restruc-
turing in the future &but believe that at this point in time the certain
benefits do not outweigh
the costs to most ratepayers.8

All drafts must be filed 30 days before the meetings at which they will be
discussed. The
draft decision is currently on the agenda for the CPUC,s Dec. 21 meeting.


NGI's Daily Gas Price Index
Breaking News : posted Oct 2, 9:35 AM
El Paso's Offshore Pipe From Nova Scotia To NY On Track
El Paso Corp. said Tuesday that because of increased drilling activity near Sable Island, it is on track to develop a $1.6 billion pipeline to transport natural gas supplies off the coast of Nova Scotia to markets in Canada and the northeastern part of the United States. The proposed Blue Atlantic Transmission System, anticipated to be in service by the fourth quarter of 2005, would be 750 miles long, and its 36-inch pipe would carry up to 1 Bcf/d along a subsea route from the southern coast of Nova Scotia to landing points in New York and New Jersey.
Noting that El Paso was pleased with the initial feasibility study, E. Jay Holm, CEO of El Paso Eastern Pipeline Group, said the company was "confident" it could develop an effective plan.
Meanwhile, Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline, the only existing system from offshore Nova Scotia to New England, has embarked on its own major expansion program designed to increase capacity on its system to 2 Bcf from 500 MMcf/d by 2010. The Scotian Shelf currently has proven reserves of more than 6 Tcf, but experts believe it could contain 10 times that amount.
El Paso clearly has its eyes set on some of those volumes, but it will have battle with Maritimes, which already has commitments from the Sable Offshore Energy Project and PanCanadian Petroleum.
"The subsea configuration offers several advantages over a land-based alternative," said Holm, "including minimal environmental impact, significant reduction in community disturbances, and anticipated transportation routes substantially less than $1 a dekatherm for firm deliveries to the New York and New Jersey markets, as well as reduced rates for deliveries to the province of Nova Scotia."
Holm said that the "anticipated rates are significantly less than that of any known current or proposed alternative project to provide firm transportation to these regions."
Blue Atlantic would offer economic benefits to Nova Scotia by creating the first access to natural gas in the province's southwestern region and would address the "continuing increasing demand" for natural gas along the U.S. East Coast, said El Paso. Natural gas demand along the East Coast is expected to increase an additional 685 MMcf/d by 2005, and will grow to an incremental 2 Bcf/d by the end of the decade.
El Paso plans to open an office in Halifax and has already retained Halifax-based Jacques Whitford Environment Ltd. as well as U.S.-based ENSR Corp. to begin the environmental work. Also, El Paso is evaluating bids on providing overall project management services to assist in siting and design of the pipe and related facilities.
Soon, El Paso plans to enter into negotiations with potential shippers and conduct an open season to determine capacity demands before the end of this year. It also is seeking input from various regulatory and government organizations, and is working with local communities involved and special interest groups to ensure issues are addressed about the project.
"This is an ambitious project and our goal is to identify various stakeholders and involve them during all phases of the development process," said Holm.
When the route has been selected, Blue Atlantic will proceed with obtaining the necessary approvals from both Canadian and U.S. regulatory officials, and El Paso said it expects filings will begin by the end of 2002.


Start Date: 4/28/01; HourAhead hour: 19;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.


Ken, Ken Lay said he is fine with this.

Rosie

Ken Rice@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
05/01/2001 03:48 PM
To: Cliff Baxter/HOU/ECT, Rick Buy/HOU/ECT, Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@Enron,
James Derrick/Corp/Enron, Andrew S Fastow/HOU/ECT, Ben Glisan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kenneth
Lay/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Metts/NA/Enron, Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lou
L Pai/HOU/EES@EES, Jeffrey Sherrick/Corp/Enron, Jeff
Skilling/Corp/Enron@Enron, Philippe A Bibi/HOU/ECT, Raymond Bowen/HOU/ECT,
Michael R Brown/LON/ECT@ECT, Wade Cline/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Mark Frevert/NA/Enron, James A Hughes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Louise
Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron, Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Rebecca McDonald/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jeffrey McMahon/HOU/ECT, Greg
Piper/Corp/Enron, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT, John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Greg
Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Harold G
Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, David W Delainey/HOU/EES@EES, Janet R
Dietrich/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Mark S Muller/HOU/EES@EES,
Matthew Scrimshaw/LON/ECT@ECT, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Thomas E
White/HOU/EES@EES, David Cox/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Steve
Elliott/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Jim Fallon/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Kevin Hannon/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron, Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Danny McCarty/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc: Carol Ann Brown/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Dorothy
Dalton/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
Subject: Executive Committee Recommendation - VP Candidate - Rick Fehl

Executive Committee:

We would like to pursue an offer to Rick Fehl prior to the next Executive
Committee meeting on May 7, 2001.  Please forward your comments or questions
as soon as possible.

You will find attached the recommendation letter and his resume.

Regards,

Ken Rice & Kevin Hannon


I just sat down this a.m. and have been either in a meeting or working on a deal.  I should be able to get back to you in the next hour or so.

BT


Paul,

		Attached is a red-lined version of the EOG interconnect agreement, which reflects some minor changes that I made. Please call me if you'd like to discuss the attachment.


This message is intended for eHRonline users only.

Due to a recent change to eHRonline, the URL (aka "Web address") for
accessing eHRonline needs to be changed on your computer.  The change
involves adding the letter "s" to the "http" reference in the URL.  The URL
for accessing eHRonline should be:   https://eHRonline.enron.com.

This change should be made by those who have added the URL as a favorite on
the browser.


The enclosed research report is being sent to you from PaineWebber by:

 Emery Financial Group

 713-957-7019

 rocky.emery@PaineWebber.COM

Please contact them if you have any questions or would like to discuss this
material.

The information contained in the attached research report is believed to be
reliable, but its accuracy is not guaranteed.  PaineWebber Incorporated
and/or Mitchell Hutchins Asset Management Inc., affiliated companies and/or
their officers, directors, employees or stockholders may at times have a
position, including an arbitrage position, in the securities described herein
and may sell or buy them to or from customers.  These companies may from time
to time act as a consultant to a company being reported upon.

You will need the Adobe Acrobat Reader to view this document.  If you don't
already have it just click on this link,
http://www.adobe.com/prodindex/acrobat/readstep.html, and follow the
on-screen instructions.  The Acrobat Reader is free of charge.

 - P004484220001201D01.pdf


December 1, 2000

     Teco Tap       35.000 / Enron ; 105.625 / HPL IFERC

December 2, 2000

     Teco Tap       30.000 / Enron ; 120.000 / HPL IFERC

December 3, 2000

     Teco Tap       30.000 / Enron ; 120.000 / HPL IFERC


Workout, Be Energized AND Feel Refreshed

Get to The Body Shop Fitness Center
A Private Club at a Fraction of the Cost

To celebrate National Employee Health & Fitness Week,
Join us for a Complimentary Guest Week May 13 - 17

	Complimentary Guest Visit  available only to Enron & UBS Employees,
	Enron Contractors, Retirees, Interns , Spouses & Dependents (18 to 24 years old)

Special Health & Fitness Presentations Each Day from 11am - 2pm
Monday:  Nutrition on the Go				Dr. Joel Bloom
Tuesday:  Spinal Assessments				Back on Track
Wednesday:  Massage Therapy				Massage Body & Soul
Thursday:  Damaged Skin Detection			DermaScan
Friday:  Fad Diets Don't Work				Amy Carlson, RD
Body Composition, Blood Pressure Checks 		Body Shop Fit Staff

OPERATING HOURS
			Monday through Thursday from 6:00 am - 7:00 pm, and Friday from 6:00 am - 6:00 pm

Group Exercise Classes start May 13th
Lunch classes scheduled daily from 12:00 pm - 12:45 pm
(Monday) Boot Camp,  (Tuesday) Cycles in Action,  (Wednesday) Power Yoga,  (Thursday) Body Sculpting,  (Friday) Cardio Blast
Classes offer cycling bikes, dumbbells, body bars, balls, steps, & exercise tubes

All guests must complete a brief health history questionnaire and release of liability waiver on their first visit.
 Guests must also present a Badge ID at each visit.


Is Daniel Lisk not participating?

-----Original Message-----
From: Buckley, Karen
Sent: Mon 10/22/2001 6:19 PM
To: Allen, Phillip K.; Arnold, John; Aucoin, Berney C. ; Black, Don; Bentley, Corry; Davis, Mark Dana; Gaskill, Chris; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; Grigsby, Mike; Herndon, Rogers; Martin, Thomas A.; Meyn, Jim; McMichael Jr., Ed; Neal, Scott; Presto, Kevin M.; Schwieger, Jim; Shively, Hunter S.; Sturm, Fletcher J.; Superty, Robert; Will, Lloyd
Cc: Lavorato, John; Kitchen, Louise
Subject: Trading Track (ENA)


I have extended #254839.

Clem Cernosek
12/22/2000 11:11 AM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Tom Acton/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: HPL Meter SOUTHERN UNION - LOCKHART

Daren:

On 5/31/2000 the above meter has recorded flow of 16 Mmbtus from HPL's
pipeline.   Deal #254839 was at the meter prior, but it expired on 5/21/00.
Currently, the volume is booked to HPL Strangers Gas Contract.  Logistics
needs either (1) have Deal #254839 extended, (2) new deal, or (3) approval to
writeoff these volumes to Unaccounted for Gas.  (Please print, sign, and
return original to Clem Cernosek).

 __________________________________________________________
 Deal/Deal Ticket#/Customer (Seller/Buyer)

    OR

 ______________________________________________________
 Approval to Writeoff the volumes to Unaccounted for Gas Loss

Thanks, Clem


I am working with Don Miller and will be responsible for receiving and
processing all due diligence requests for Pastoria.

Below are our responses to PG&E's questions:

QUESTION:Is the major maintenance reserve estimate based on a negotiated Long
Term Services Agreement (LTSA)?  If so, will it be in place and transfer with
PEF?

RESPONSE:  We have not negotiated an LTSA with anyone at this time, and we do
not expect to have one in place to transfer with PEF.  The maintenance
reserve is our estimate based on industry data and information from GE.

QUESTION: Are spare parts for the first major overhaul included anywhere in
the capital cost estimate or are they assumed to be purchased through the
maintenance reserve estimate (i.e. the LTSA) charge?

RESPONSE:  The maintenance reserve is intended to include parts and labor for
the overhaul.

QUESTION: What is Enron's intent re: continuing involvement?  PG&E is
concerned about any potential requirements that they might be required to
either purchase fuel from Enron or engage Enron as the power marketer.

RESPONSE: Enron is very flexible re continuing involvement:  scheduling
coordination, fuel supply, power marketing, etc.  We are also flexible re the
time period and the terms of the continuing involvement.  Whatever
arrangement is developed would be mutually beneficial.

QUESTION: What is status of EPC negotiations.  Will they be required to
engage NEPCO as the EPC contractor?  Does the EPC contractor have control
over the turbines?

RESPONSE: o EPC negotiations are complete with NEPCO.  Contract has not been
executed, but has been "put on the shelf" awaiting decision on successful
bidder for the purchase of the Pastoria project from ENA.  Successful bidder
and NEPCO will each have the option of executing the EPC agreement.

  o The successful bidder will be under no obligation to engage NEPCO.

  o Pastoria has control of the turbines.

QUESTION: They also questioned whether there would be any "agricultural
restrictions"?

RESPONSE: The project site is presently under a Williamson Act contract to
maintain agricultural use in exchange for lower taxes.  Last week, the Kern
County Board of Supervisors voted to cancel the Williamson Act contract to
allow for industrial use, which started a 180-day public comment period.
However, the Governor has on his desk a bill for signature that would reduce
the public comment period for the cancellation to the same time frame as the
request for rehearing period for the CEC Final Decision.  (The Governor has
until 9/30 sign the bill and is expected to do so because of the overwhelming
support of the bill in the Assembly and the Senate.)  The cancellation will
be contingent upon a successful CEC decision and a payment of a Williamson
Act cancellation fee.

QUESTION: I received a call from Tom Favinger at PG&E today.  He would like
to get a breakout of the $10.25 million item in the Pastoria capital budget
labeled Pre-Commercial Operations Costs.

RESPONSE: The breakdown (in $MM) is as follows:

Project management during construction  $1.000
Start-up and acceptance    2.900
Insurance and performance bond   1.846
Owner's Engineer     1.500
County Chief Building Officer/Engineer/Consultant 3.000

TOTAL      $10.246

Should you have any questions, please call me at 713.345.8992.


I assume the issue is TGS (instead of CGS)
I will call you after sending this mail.
Below is a small analysis related to the convertibility Law and TGS.

1. Argentina Convertibility Law No 23,928.

The Convertibility Law passed on March 1991 determined the following:
? Established a fixed exchange rate between the dollar and the national
currency (1 dollar = 10,000 Australes, latter defined as equal to 1 peso)
? The Central Bank (Argentine Federal Reserve) must permanently have
international reserves (dollars, gold, other currencies) available to back
100% of the monetary base. The Central Bank must sell all required dollars at
the fixed exchange rate.
? It is forbidden any price adjustment clause by an index.
? For all transactions agreed upon before the Law, prices could not be larger
than the contractual price, adjusted by the exchange rate variation plus 12%
a year (section 9). This section affected contracts in force.
? The Convertibility Law was just amended on June 22nd 2001 by the Law 25445,
to equal 1 peso to the simple average of 1 dollar and 1 euro. Anyway,
according to its section 2, the new Convertibility rule will only be in force
once the price market of 1 dollar is equal to 1 euro (to avoid a surprise
devaluation).

2. Legal requirements for a devaluation

To modify the exchange rate before 1 dollar = 1 euro, it would be necessary
to abolish or amend again the Convertibility Law.
In such regards, the Congress would have to abolish the Convertibility Law or
keep the Convertibility at a different exchange rate.
Although in principle a devaluation should not affect contracts with prices
set in dollars, even the Convertibility Law has affected contracts that were
in force.
So, there is a certain risk that a new eventual amendment of the
Convertibility Law could affect contracts in force.
In fact I think there is a higher risk of the government breaching the
contracts or defaulting debt payments than devaluating the currency by
surprise.

3. Impact on TGS
Since the privatization rules establish that TGS, rates are in dollars, a
devaluation that respects contracts in force should not have a significant
impact on TGS financial results.
However, due to the social impact of a devaluation, the Congress could pass a
new law establishing a new mechanism to calculate Public Utilities rates. The
higher the percentage of devaluation (and the higher the social turmoil), the
higher is the probability that this kind of Law would be passed.

Richard Shapiro
07/15/2001 06:32 PM

To: Guillermo Canovas/SA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Please read- Argentina economic risk

Let's discuss.
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 07/15/2001
04:36 PM ---------------------------
From: Robert Johnston/ENRON@enronXgate on 07/12/2001 10:54 AM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Kevin Hannon/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Brendan
Fitzsimmons/ENRON@enronXgate, Scott Tholan/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject: Please read- Argentina economic risk

Hi Rick- Kevin Hannon asked that we contact you to coordinate some market
intelligence research pertaining to the deepening financial crisis in
Argentina.  Kevin would like us to investigate how Enron's CGS project will
be treated by the Argentinean govt should a default or devaluation take
place.  We understand that you have the contract providing more information
on how the project is protected by international treaty. It would be great if
we could get a copy and meet with you briefly to discuss this request.

Thanks for any help you can provide during what I know is a very busy time
for you!

Robert Johnston
Manager, Market Analysis
Enron Wholesale Services
x39934


FYI:  The PML valuation process resulted in incremental "value" which can be
taken into income.  I told Juanita and Andrea that it would be ridiculously
imprudent to take any more income.  Andrea and her analytics staff tend to
agree with me but Delainey is on to it and will likely push to take it.  I
told Ondarza and Delainey that I will not sign off on it.  Without my
signature, Delainey may end up calling you.  ENA has a Q4 hole that Cliff is
trying to fill.  The income that ENA may try to squeeze from PML is
US$2-4MM.

On a related matter, Paul wants to take over the Board responsibilities (and
overall management) of the deal.  Paul is comfortable with the value
recognized to date, and agrees with us that we should not take any more.
Given the related income form energy management (C$500M) and financial
advisory fee (approx C$1,500M), I think it is a good thing for Enron Canada
to manage.


Gerald,  This is the form used for Howell which is currently being
negotiated on Lost Creek.   This is the North Central Form.


GADSDEN RESEARCH  SERVICES'

FERCwatch?
?June 11,?2001
?

FERC Agenda for  Wednesday, June 13, 2001
?
To review  the?official posted?agenda?in html go  to:
COMMISSION AGENDA
(If you retrieve the agenda for the previous meeting, you  must first delete
previously viewed pages?in your internet  browser)

?
GRS DRAFT ORDER SUBSCRIBERS:? PLEASE SUBMIT DRAFT ORDER  REQUESTS (FAX or
E-MAIL) BY 6 P.M. TUESDAY,?June 12TH.
?
Reply by inserting?the appropriate letter designation?in  the Request Copy
column (D for Regular or Overnight  Delivery,?R for Rush Delivery, or F for
Fax).?  Please include your internal reference numbers in the Client
Charge/Billing No.  column.? (If your e-mail program does not allow you to
view this  transmission in a table format and you would like a copy sent to
you as a Word  or?WordPerfect attachment, or faxed to you, please reply to
grs4ferc@starpower.net.

DRAFT  ORDER REQUESTS

JUNE  13, 2001

(fax  to 202-318-4524 or e-mail to grs4ferc@starpower.net

by  6 p.m. Tuesday, June 12, 2001)

?

?

Item No.

	?

	Docket  Nos.

		?

		Company  Name

			Request  Copy

			D - Deliver

			R - Rush

			F - Fax

				?

				Client  Charge/

				Billing  No.

CAE-1

	ER01-1810-000

		Ameren Energy Marketing Company

			?

				?

CAE-2

	OMITTED

		?

			?

				?

CAE-3

	ER01-1229-000 ER01-1229-001

		Valley Electric Association, Inc.

			?

				?

CAE-4

	ER01-1866-000 ER01-1593-000 ER01-1593-001

		Entergy Services, Inc.

			?

				?

CAE-5

	ER01-1718-000 ER00-2998-001 ER00-2999-001 ER00-3000-001  ER00-3001-001
ER01-1718-001

		Dynegy Power Marketing, Inc.? Southern Company  Services, Inc.

			?

				?

CAE-6

	ER01-2076-000

		New York Independent System Operator

			?

				?

CAE-7

	ER00-3591-006 ER00-1969-007

		New York Independent System Operator

			?

				?

CAE-8

	ER01-200-000 ER01-200-001

		Cincergy Services, Inc.

			?

				?

CAE-9

	ER01-1306-000

		Cargill-Alliant, Inc.

			?

				?

CAE-10

	EC96-19-055 ER96-1663-058

		California Independent System Operator  Corporation

			?

				?

CAE-11

	OMITTED

		?

			?

				?

CAE-12

	ER00-1843-001

		New York Independent System Operator

			?

				?

CAE-13

	EC01-91-000

		PacifiCorp

			?

				?

CAE-14

	EC01-63-000 EL01-56-000

		Niagara Mohawk Holdings, Inc. and National Grid  USA

			?

				?

CAE-15

	OMITTED

		?

			?

				?

CAE-16

	TX00-1-001 ER00-896-001

		US Dept. of Energy - Western Area Power Administration,  Colorado River
Storage Project Management Center

		Public Service Company of New Mexico

			?

				?

CAE-17

	OA96-81-001

		Indianapolis Power & Light Company

			?

				?

CAE-18

	ER98-1106-001

		New England Power Company, et al.

			?

				?

CAE-19

	ER99-1142-006 ER99-2892-001

		New England Power Pool

			?

				?

CAE-20

	EL00-45-001

		Wisconsin Public Power, Inc. v. Wisconsin Power and  Light Company and
Alliant Energy, Inc.

			?

				?

CAE-21

	OA96-194-007

		Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation

			?

				?

CAE-22

	ER00-3316-001

		American Transmission Company, LLC

			?

				?

CAE-23

	RT01-67-002

		GridFlorida LLC, Florida Power & Light Company,  Florida Power Corporation
and Tampa Electric Company

			?

				?

CAE-24

	OA01-5-000

		Citizens Communications Company

			?

				?

CAE-25

	OMITTED

		?

			?

				?

CAE-26

	EL01-69-000

		FirstEnergy Operating Companies and American  Transmission Systems, Inc.

			?

				?

CAE-27

	EL01-59-000 EC01-110-000

		TransEnergie U.S. Ltd. And Cross Sound Cable Company,  LLC

			?

				?

CAE-28

	EL01-51, et al. ER01-1649, et al.

		Detroit  Edison Company

			?

				?

CAE-29

	EL01-78-000

		LG&E Energy Marketing, Inc.

			?

				?

CAE-30

	OA97-24-005, et al.

		Central Power and Light Company, West Texas Utilities  Company, Southwestern
Electric Power Company and Public Service Company of  Oklahoma

			?

				?

CAE-31

	ER01-1847-000, et al.

		Allegheny Energy Supply Company, LLC Southern Company  Services, Inc.

			?

				?

CAE-32

	OMITTED

		?

			?

				?

CAE-33

	EL00-62-004, et al.

		ISO New England, Inc. and New England Power Pool

			?

				?

CAE-34

	ER98-3853-005

		New England Power Pool

			?

				?

CAG-1

	RP01-416-000

		Northwest Pipeline Corporation

			?

				?

CAG-2

	OMITTED

		?

			?

				?

CAG-3

	RP01-423-000

		Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation

			?

				?

CAG-4

	RP01-419-000

		TransColorado Gas Transmission Company

			?

				?

CAG-5

	PR01-5-000

		Magic Valley Pipeline, L.P.

			?

				?

CAG-6

	PR01-8

		Arkansas Oklahoma Gas Corporation

			?

				?

CAG-7

	RP01-93-000

		Kern River Gas Transmission Company

			?

				?

CAG-8

	PR00-9-000

		EPGT Texas Pipeline, L.P.

			?

				?

CAG-9

	RP95-408-040

		Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation

			?

				?

CAG-10

	RP00-223-004

		Northern Natural Gas Company

			?

				?

CAG-11

	OMITTED

		?

			?

				?

CAG-12

	RP01-278-001

		Texas Gas Transmission Corp.

			?

				?

CAG-13

	RP95-197-040 RP97-71-028

		Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp.

			?

				?

CAG-14

	MG00-6-007 MG00-6-008

		Dominion Transmission, Inc.

			?

				?

CAG-15

	OR00-3-000 OR95-9-000

		Colonial Pipeline Company

			?

				?

CAH-1

	P-2436-139

		Consumers Energy Company

			?

				?

CAH-2

	P-6879-027????????  P-6879-026

		Southeastern Hydro-Power, Inc.

			?

				?

CAH-3

	OMITTED

		?

			?

				?

CAH-4

	P-5-045

		PPL Montana, LLC, Confederated Salish and Kootenai  Tribes of the Flathead
Reservation

			?

				?

CAC-1

	CP00-68-000 CP00-68-001

		Questar Pipeline Company

			?

				?

CAC-2

	CP98-131-004

		Vector Pipeline L.P.

			?

				?

CAC-3

	CP01-179-000

		?Georgia  Straight Crossing Pipeline LP

			?

				?

CAC-4

	CP96-206-001 CP96-207-001

		Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. Williams Gas  Processing - Gulf Coast Co.

			?

				?

CAC-5

	CP01-66-000

		Egan Hub Partners, L.P.

			?

				?

CAC-6

	CP00-48-003 CP00-48-004

		Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company

			?

				?

H-1

	RESERVED

		?

			?

				?

C-1

	RESERVED

		?

			?

				?

E-1

	RESERVED

		?

			?

				?

G-1

	RESERVED

		?

			?

				?

?
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????

GRS' FERCwatch e-mail notification is  a free courtesy service of Gadsden
Research Services, energy research and  document retrieval specialists.?
Periodically (generally once or twice  weekly), GRS will broadcast FERCwatch
with descriptions of?major  FERC issuances or filings such as rulemakings,
policy statements,  mergers,?new rate filings, major?rate changes, and
certificate  filings.
?
GRS can provide  hardcopies?of any of the above listed items at nominal
charges;?for  document requests or estimates of charges, please reply
to?grs4ferc@starpower.net?or call 202.255.4771 (toll free, 1.877.544.4771).
?
For an  e-mailed?copy of?a brochure?of GRS services and rates for FERC  and
other federal agency research please e-mail your request to
grs4ferc@starpower.net.?  For a mailed copy, please  include your name, firm
name and street address.? For?a faxed copy,  please include your fax number.
?
The FERCwatch  subscription list is used for the sole purpose of providing
information on FERC  and energy industry activity and will not be sold or
otherwise distributed to  any other business or organization.? For additions
or removal from the  FERCwatch notification list, please reply
to?grs4ferc@starpower.net.
?
Send suggestions on how  the GRS' FERCwatch can better serve the?energy
community to?grs4ferc@starpower.net.


Hey Kenny.

Thanks for checking on me.  My trip to Omaha was okay.  On one hand, it gave
me a real good idea of what type of shape Daddy really is in.  It's not real
good, but he feels optimistic.  You know he has prostate cancer and I believe
it has started spreading into the bones.  He's very, very weak, can't walk
more than 10 to 20 steps without becoming physically worn out.  Mom has to
drive him everywhere he goes, (he doesn't go that many places).  He's
definitely has his good days and his bad days.  He is taking regular pain
pills constantly and has morphine tablets for extreme pain, which he's in
half the time.  It's really sad.  He's lost alot of weight, but he's in good
spirits I guess.    To talk to him over the phone or hear him over tje radio,
you would swear he's in great health.  It's was really hard for me to get a
true perspective because I know he was trying to put on his best act, so that
I would not worry.   It's extremely hard to see your parents going through
this kind of suffering.

He says he going to beat this thing, so alot of times, it's mind over matter,
along with lots of prayer.

Mom is wanting to quit her job, (she's a teachers aide), but Daddy doesn't
want her to do it.  Daddy says he's going back to work.  Please pray for Mom
as well, I know she's scared to death, and doesn't know what to really do.

Talk to you later!


1 billion divided by 5,000 victims = 200,000. Why do i know that the storey family will get none. (not that she needs it)

-----Original Message-----
From: Bradley E. Morrow [mailto:bradley@morrownet.net]
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 10:43 AM
To: Bradley E. Morrow; pys@morrownet.net; cmorrow@enron.com; gstorey@enron.com; Tracey Storey
Subject: Re: wtc gov urn and charities

Here is the file in case you have trouble w/ the link

----- Original Message -----
From: Bradley E. Morrow <mailto:bradley@morrownet.net>
To: pys@morrownet.net <mailto:pys@morrownet.net> ; cmorrow@enron.com <mailto:cmorrow@enron.com> ; gstorey@enron.com <mailto:gstorey@enron.com> ; Tracey Storey <mailto:tastorey@earthlink.net>
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 9:07 PM
Subject: wtc gov urn and charities

<http://my.aol.com/news/news_story.psp?type=1&cat=0100&id=0110021953090980>


I went into Scheduling to view these deals and they have been zeroed out.  I'm confused as to why they would appear in the view actuals in deal entry.  I believe these should synchronize, or they read off of one another. ??

diana

Deal # 517673.1 and 517674.1

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Chang, Fran
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 11:39 AM
To:	Scholtes, Diana; Crandall, Sean
Subject:	FW: NCPA buy/resale deal

HI Diana and Sean:

Would you advise whether I can ask scheduling to zero out volumes for NCPA buy/resale deals for 10/1/01-10/3/01 in "View Actual" tab in deal entry?

Thanks,
Fran

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Chang, Fran
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 4:14 PM
To:	Scholtes, Diana; Crandall, Sean
Subject:	NCPA buy/resale deal
Importance:	High

Hi Diana and Sean:

I believe we didn't buy/resell with NCPA for 10/1/01-10/3/01.  Although we are good in scheduling (no activities scheduled) there are some volumes showing up in deal entry side ("view actuals" tab).  In order to make sure that at month end settlement processes will be smooth for these NCPA buy/resale deals, I would like to ask the scheduling group to zero out those volumes for 10/1/01-10/3/01 in view actuals in deal entry, but I need you to give me the green light first.  Your confirmation will be appreciated.

Thanks,

Fran
x7973


Per my previous email.  NW doesn't have this change.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/25/2001 11:36
AM ---------------------------

	From:  Rebecca Walker                           04/24/2001 04:05 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Booth/NA/Enron@Enron, Catherine
Clark/Enron@EnronXGate

Subject: PLEASE REVIEW -- Changes to Northwestern Letter Agreement

Kay

Attached are changes to the Northwestern 7EA Letter Agreement.  Per Ben
Jacoby's request, I have updated the Remaining Purchase Amount Instalment
(Schedule III) Amounts.  Catherine Clark in Global Finance has signed off on
these numbers, as well.  Please call me at x57968 if you have any questions.

Regards,
Rebecca


We will agree that the attached does not apply to world hunger - only to
Turbo Park.

Rose

	michael.barnas@ps.ge.com
	12/06/2000 03:33 PM

		 To: Kay.Mann@enron.com, Sheila.Tweed@enron.com, Roseann.Engeldorf@enron.com,
Lisa.Bills@enron.com
		 cc: kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com, stephen.swift@ps.ge.com, paul.miller@ps.ge.com
		 Subject: New, Improved Consent to Assignment and Assignment Sideletter Lan
guage

Fellow Sufferers,

Below you will find:

(a)    a revised Consent to Assignment, and

(b)    assignment language waiting to be framed:

Please note that in the interest of time I am sending them to you before the
GE team has had an opportunity to review them.  Accordingly, there may be
some addition comments from our side.

Happy reading!

 Mike Barnas
g _____________
Michael C. Barnas
Counsel, Power Plants Commercial Operations
GE Power Systems
One River Road - Building 37, Room 307
Schenectady,  NY 12345  USA
Phone 8*235-7602       (518) 385 7602
Fax     8*235 5466        (518) 385 5466
Mobile 518 369 9538

This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent
responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this message in
error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and erase all copies of
this message.  Thank you.

 - ESAconsentMCBRev.doc
 - WorldHungerAssignmentDec6.doc


Yes.  The balances will have to be sold at interconnects and not in place.

Ruth

-----Original Message-----
From: Barbe, Robin
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 9:59 AM
To: Concannon, Ruth; Germany, Chris
Cc: McMichael Jr., Ed; Garza, Maria
Subject: RE: Revised Letter

are we to include these imbalances in the gas volumes we are selling?

-----Original Message-----
From: Concannon, Ruth
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 9:57 AM
To: Germany, Chris; Barbe, Robin
Cc: McMichael Jr., Ed; Garza, Maria
Subject: FW: Revised Letter

Chris and Robin,

Besides the storage inventory, we have two transport imbalances that we also will need to sell.  See the below note.

Thanks,
Ruth

-----Original Message-----
From: Wynne, Rita
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 4:05 PM
To: Concannon, Ruth
Cc: Garza, Maria
Subject: RE: Revised Letter

I spoke with Doug Wilkinson who is the Controller over at Bridgeline and he confirmed his volumes on the firm contract (96034592) to be 18,159 due ENA and the IT contract (96034796) to be 6,212 due ENA.  He is in agreement that these balances exists on these contracts and that these volumes are due ENA per their records as of today. I also mentioned to him that I knew where the difference was of the 19 mmbtus that we are off (August 2001, meter 843019).   If I need to do anything else, please don't hesitate to let me know.  Thanks!

-----Original Message-----
From: Concannon, Ruth
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 1:57 PM
To: Wynne, Rita
Cc: Garza, Maria
Subject: RE: Revised Letter

Rita,

Do you have a contact over at Bridgeline that you can call and get each of these balances reconciled?  Ideally, ENA and Bridgeline need to have the same numbers.  If we cannot agree, we will have to have Chip resolve the differences when he completes the deal.

Thanks for your help and keep me posted,
Ruth

-----Original Message-----
From: Wynne, Rita
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 1:20 PM
To: Concannon, Ruth
Cc: Garza, Maria
Subject: RE: Revised Letter

Ruth,

With the adjustments made and the discrepancy that I found and will have corrected shortly, I am within 2 mmbtus of Bridegline's number.  My balance for storage contract  96034600 is 1,930,554 mmbtus due ENA.  My balances for contracts 96034592 and 96034796 are 18,178) mmbtus and 6,212 mmbuts, respectively, both due ENA.  The diference in Enron's number and Bridgeline's number on contract 96034592 is 19 mmbuts I believe needs to be corrected on B/L's side.  If you need any supporting documentation, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Thanks,
Rita

-----Original Message-----
From: Concannon, Ruth
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 10:30 AM
To: Schneider, Chip; Bartlett, Jeff; Gray, Barbara N.; Jayne South
(E-mail); Mark Ellenberg (E-mail); McMichael Jr., Ed; Sharp, Greg;
Stephen Youngman (E-mail)
Cc: Wynne, Rita; Garza, Maria
Subject: RE: Revised Letter

Chip,

For the letter, we need to change the first sentence in Item #2 to the sentence given below.  This should cover any storage volume differences discovered during our reconciliation and the 24,390 Dth imbalance gas that is due ENA on the transportation contracts.

2.  Bridgeline purchases from ENA the final reconciled gas inventory stored under ENA's Firm Gas Storage Agreement with Bridgeline, currently estimated at 1,930,552 Dth, and the 24,390 Dth total imbalance gas that Bridgeline Holdings owes ENA under Transportation Agreements #96034592 and #96034796.

We will work with the Bridgeline accounting folks over the next few days to get the final reconciled storage balance.  I will let you know ASAP.

Ruth

-----Original Message-----
From: Schneider, Chip
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 8:34 AM
To: Bartlett, Jeff; Concannon, Ruth; Gray, Barbara N.; Jayne South
(E-mail); Mark Ellenberg (E-mail); McMichael Jr., Ed; Sharp, Greg;
Stephen Youngman (E-mail)
Subject: Revised Letter

Please let me know your final thoughts and comments this morning by 10:00am CDT, so we can get this letter out.  Thanks.


also, if "NL1" appears anywhere else, change it to NXL1

thanks

fletch


Andrea Everage
1729 Bayview Drive
Fort Wayne, IN 46815
everan01@hotmail.com

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Andrea Everage


When I see the filing, I'll outline our response.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 10/10/2000 10:40 AM
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Ronald Carroll" <rcarroll@bracepatt.com>
10/10/2000 10:35 AM

To: "Nancy Pickover" <npickover@bracepatt.com>, <mary.hain@enron.com>,
<smara@enron.com>, <snovose@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Another complaint in California

Yet one more complaint regarding electricity prices in California:

Californians for Renewable Energy, Inc. v. Independent Energy Producers,
Inc., et al., EL01-2-000 (10/06/00) -- Petitions the Commission to: (1)
rectify unjust and unreasonable prices stemming from the wholesale markets
for energy and ancillary services operated by the California ISO and
California PX; (2) make findings that the events and circumstances
surrounding the June 14, 2000 rolling outage in the San Francisco Bay Area
warrant investigation by the Justice Department of trust activities in
restraint of trade by Independent Energy Producers and all sellers of energy
and ancillary services into the California ISO and PX markets.

Nancy: Please get a copy of the complaint for Sue, Mary, Sarah and me.
Thanks.


Congratulations on the good news.  Sorry to hear about the bad news.  There seem to be lots of scheduling jobs around here but I don't know if you want to do that.  Bob Superty is the best person to chat with their.  Also, you might chat with AEP.  They just bought some Houston assets and they might be keeping those assets in Houston.

To:	Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	Hello!

Hello Chris!

I was writing to give you some good news and bad news.

Good news:  I got engaged last weekend.  I am very excited!  Todd is a very wonderful person.  This is the person I met on MM last year who lives in Columbus.

Bad news:  I am getting laid off.  I transferred to Columbus with Clinton.  They are laying off half their staff.

I am not real fond of Columbus and hope to move back to Houston one day.  Hopefully we can work together again one day.

Hope all is well with you!

Take care!

Susan


Sounds great!

Keep up the good work, power god.

Bobette Riner
Senior Power Markets Analyst
TradersNews Energy
713/647-8690
FAX: 713/647-7552
cell: 832/428-7008
bobette.riner@ipgdirect.com
http://www.tradersnewspower.com

----- Original Message -----
From: <Don.Baughman@enron.com>
To: <bobette.riner@ipgdirect.com>
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 1:52 PM
Subject: Re: we'll take care of you

>
> Gracias!
>
> Let's try to get together Wed. or so!
>
> Thanks,
>
> Don C. Baughman
> Enron Power Marketing, Inc.
> 713-853-0392
>


cute

>>> "Love, Phillip M." <Phillip.M.Love@ENRON.com> 01/17/02 08:55AM >>>

-----Original Message-----
From: Hopkins, Stephanie
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:24 AM
To: Annette Hopkins (E-mail); Bill Hopkins (E-mail); Bobbie-Lynn
Gallois
(E-mail); Cathy-Anne Delaune (E-mail); Brady, Edward; Julie Greiner
(E-mail); Katie Devall (E-mail); Kevin Murray (E-mail); Melissa Alford
(E-mail); Tyrus Brailey (E-mail); Kulic, Sladana-Anna; Mills, Bruce;
Doan, Jad; Love, Phillip M.
Subject: FW: Andersen

Stephanie Hopkins
Enron Net Works
Risk Management
(713) 853-5211

-----Original Message-----
From: Morua, Mark (US - Houston) [mailto:mmorua@deloitte.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:10 PM
To: Poche', Tim (US - Houston); Worthing, Ashley; Charles. A. Lestage
(E-mail); Fernando Granda (E-mail); Jennifer J Dubos (E-mail); Kelly
Sills (E-mail); Marcia McMorris (E-mail); Missy St. Germain (E-mail);
Hopkins, Stephanie
Subject: FW: Andersen

This is pretty funny!

Mark A. Morua
Deloitte & Touche, LLP
Assurance and Advisory Services
713-982-4574
713-207-3116 (Reliant)

-----Original Message-----
From: Jarratt, Joel (US - Houston)
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:03 PM
To: Ellis, Bryan (US - Houston); Paladino, Gianpaolo (US - Houston);
Morua, Mark (US - Houston); LeGrand, Chris (US - Houston); Stephenson,
Allison (US - Houston); Almon, Misty (US - Houston); McIntyre, Nicole
(US - Houston); Schwausch, Scott (US - Houston); Wight, Jennifer (US -
Houston); Rodriguez, Katherine (US - Houston); Murrell, Brian (US -
Houston)
Subject: Forwarding to team REGCO (and selected others) for their
amusement

-----Original Message-----
From: Popfarm@aol.com [mailto:Popfarm@aol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 5:44 PM
To: Jarratt, Joel (US - Houston); jdjarr_99@yahoo.com
Subject: (no subject)

watch what you shred    XXXXPOP
This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
information
intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by
law.  If
you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message.
Any
disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of
any
action based on it, is strictly prohibited.

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the
sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or
disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact
the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at
enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the
message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be
an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and
enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and
the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by
anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


I just spoke with Mary to make sure we have the same information.  Here are
the facts we have so far.  On November 4th, the CPUC filed a motion with
FERC to adopt the form of protective order that the CPUC entered, to compel
the production of documents and to shorten time to answer.  According to
Exhibit B (read to me by Nancy Pickover at Bracewell) the following CPUC
moved against the following entities:  AES, Williams, Duke, Dynegy, Reliant
and Southern.  Enron entities were NOT named in exhibit B.  This is not to
say that we could not be easily added to the group.  While the motion reads
as if the CPUC was moving against everybody, in fact, in footnote 2 they
state they are only moving against the entities named in Exhibit B.  We will
have Exhibit B in hand first thing tomorrow via FEDEX to confirm this.  To
repeat, Enron is not named yet.

Thanks
Gary

-----Original Message-----
From: Mary.Hain@enron.com [mailto:Mary.Hain@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 6:23 PM
To: dwatkiss@bracepatt.com; Susan.J.Mara@enron.com;
Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com; James.D.Steffes@enron.com;
Christian.Yoder@enron.com; Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com; mday@gmssr.com;
gfergus@brobeck.com; rcarroll@bracepatt.com; Alan.Comnes@enron.com;
Joe.Hartsoe@enron.com; Sarah.Novosel@enron.com
Cc: Tim.Belden@enron.com; Lysa.Akin@enron.com
Subject: Important - CPUC Motion - Confidential Attorney Client
Privilege and Work Product

As you may already know, the CPUC filed a motion at FERC asking for a
protective order and to compel production of the information they subpoened
from us in the CPUC's OII case.  Given the timing, we should discuss this
on our conference call scheduled for tomorrow.

They request that we be required:
   to answer their motion on Thursday,
   to provide the information within 5 working days of a FERC ordering
   production, and
   to provide of P&L information and spread sheets detailing our deals,
   specifically delivery point, delivery date, counterparty, volume and
   price.

We may not have a problem providing this information for use by FERC in its
proceeding subject to a confidentiality agreement but I think we would
oppose their requests for:
   the information to be provided for "government eyes only" -  this would
   prohibit EPMI from defending itself vis-a-vis other market participants.
   a FERC confidentiality order that would could allow FERC to "share" this
   information with the CPUC (for purposes of the PUC's OII proceeding)
   pursuant to 16 U.S.C. 824h(c).  16 USC 824g(c) requires the Commission
   to make information available to state commissions as may be of
   assistance in state regulation of public utilities.  We should argue
   that 16 USC 824h(c) does not apply here given that we are not a public
   utility nor does the PUC regulate how much market power wholesale
   marketers exercise or the level of market power mitigation (these are
   the bases the PUC provides for explaining why it should have this
   information.)
   the above contractual information to allow them to analyze the
   competitiveness of the forward market to evaluate the wisdom of the
   Commission's  decision to allow the UDC's "unfettered access" to the
   forwards market.  This argument is unpersuasive given that the CPUC can
   get information about the competitiveness of the forward markets from
   the Wall Street Journal's listing of NYMEX prices.

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com


Done.

"Dan J Hyvl" <Dan_J_Hyvl@enron.com> on 01/24/2000 04:31:28 PM

To:   Sara Davidson/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:  Re:

Sara,
     Can you change my Thursday afternoon activity from Relaxing at the Resort
to Rafting on the Guadalupe River.

"Sara Davidson" <sdavid2@ect.enron.com> on 01/21/2000 08:48:35 AM

To:   BCC
cc:    (bcc: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT)
Subject:

Your RSVP form for the 2000 Enron Law Conference has been received.  Thank you
for your attention to this matter.


Hollis,

Mark Fisher pulled up the original SUB 352-C, which defined the what and when
for Zmet files.

At the time we did not have a complete information chain.  In my
conversations with Garth (just confirmed), these two files are not
overwritten and remain on the HD until deleted.  Therefor we have access to
daily files for each day/month, and one monthly file.  When the rollover
occurs, a new file name is started and the process starts again.

So, we could modify the current SUB to include only a monthly download and be
more specific on where/how to store the files.  Currently these files are
written into a MET folder under the Plant PC the Zmet is attached to in the
field.  The downloads we receive sometimes separate out this directory so it
appears on the Plant directory level, other times it is left as a
sub-directory under the turbine Plant directory it is attached to.

Hope this helps

-JD

Hollis Kimbrough
05/14/2002 01:58 PM
To: Jeff Duff/EWC/Enron@ENRON
cc: Mark V Walker/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Mark Fisher/EWC/Enron@Enron

Subject: Modification to down load VisuPro Z-Met data

Jeff,

Do you know how often we need to download the Z-Met data?  In other words,
what are the file characteristics?  Do they overwrite every 3.4 days, are
they a data stack which has 1000 records, etc.

Thanks,
Hollis
---------------------- Forwarded by Hollis Kimbrough/EWC/Enron on 05/14/2002
02:11 PM ---------------------------

Hollis Kimbrough
05/14/2002 01:56 PM
To: Kelly Chambers/EWC/Enron@ENRON
cc: Mark V Walker/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Mark Fisher/EWC/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Duff/EWC/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Modification to down load VisuPro Z-Met data

Kelly,

We need to prepare an SUB to change the downloading requirement for the
VisuPro data.  Specifically we need to include the Z-Met data (file and
frequency) as well as a uniform methodology for file management.

Can we meet in the morning sometime to discuss?

Thanks,
Hollis


They will be there for one day this week, but really not till Sunday, when
they leave Houston for Cincy.


You speak at 10:05 a.m. Boise time

DOE conference call at 3:00 p.m. Eastern time, 1:00 Boise time.
Paul Carrier will follow up with details.


Looks like a pain in the ass girl.  Let's see, that would make 2 in my household.

http://www.babynet.com/tools/chinacalendar/chinchart1.htm

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Garza, Maria
Sent:	Monday, April 15, 2002 8:49 AM
To:	Germany, Chris
Subject:	Check this out

Hey you...

Thought this was interesting...check it out. Not that it's true...but its nice to speculate.

http://www.babynet.com/tools/chinacalendar/chinchart1.htm


Search Over 100,000 Artists ArtistAlbumSongTour DatesRecord LabelRadio-TraditionalRadio-InternetMusician ResourceRetail OutletMagazineMeta SiteVenueFestivalPromoter/AgentTicket Seller [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  November 20, 2001    [IMAGE]    [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  Breaking News    [IMAGE]Jay-Z gets unplugged with Mary J. [IMAGE]Sigur Ros win Shortlist Prize [IMAGE]Can guitarist dies [IMAGE]Mick Jagger plays one US show [IMAGE]No Doubt and Destiny's Child join Billboard Awards lineup [IMAGE]Public Enemy to release fan remixes [IMAGE]Waylon Jennings hospitalized [IMAGE]Billy Corgan debuts new band [IMAGE]Slipknot cancel US dates [IMAGE]Alanis Morissette to receive U.N award  Get breaking news 24/7 from over 40 sources, all in one great place - click here !   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  New Releases   Featured Releases: [IMAGE]Creed  - Weathered $14.99 [IMAGE]Too $hort  - Chase The Cat $14.99 [IMAGE]Sting  - All This Time  $14.99 [IMAGE]Smashing Pumpkins  - Greatest Hits $16.99 [IMAGE]Pink  - Misundaztood $14.99 [IMAGE]Kid Rock  - Cocky $14.99 [IMAGE]Aerosmith  - Young Lust $20.99 [IMAGE]Madonna  - Greatest Hits Volume 2 $14.99 [IMAGE]Hoobastank  - Hoobastank $9.99 [IMAGE]Various  - Concert For New York City $19.99  Upcoming DVDs, Pre-Order Now!  [IMAGE]Incubus  - When Incubus Attacks $19.99 [IMAGE]Britney Spears  - Britney: The Videos $16.99 [IMAGE]Red Hot Chili Peppers  - Off The Map $19.99    [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]        [IMAGE]     [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  Win A Custom Cop Car!   Album Network says: "Just when it seemed that all popular music, particularly in the rock/alternative arena, was engaged in a competition to see who could dumb it down the most, along comes a breath of fresh air in the form of Fast, whose complex musical arrangements and sly sense of humor are, simply put, a revelation."   [IMAGE]Download Custom's debut single "Hey Mister," watch his cool urban motocross footage and win an undercover cop car here.   [IMAGE]Check out the official Custom site  and join the Custom e-team now!   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  Free Incubus Ringtone   Love Incubus?  Now you can hear them every time your phone rings!  For a limited time, you can download a free Incubus ringtone right to your compatible wireless phone, exclusively from AT?Wireless.  The song you'll hear is "Nice To Know You", from Incubus's new album Morning View.  Get it now and you'll be the envy of all your friends.  Click here for more info...    No purchase necessary.  Must be an AT?Wireless customer with a compatible Nokia phone to receive offer.  Offer expires 12-02-01.    [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]      [IMAGE]    [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  Tickets On Sale   Don't waste time in line. You can check tour dates and buy your tix immediately online at ARTISTdirect!  [IMAGE]Tickets now available for:   U2  Macy Gray  Elton John & Billy Joel     Nickelback  B.B. King  Good Charlotte & MEST  Jurassic 5  Slayer  Barry Manilow  and more  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  Featured Downloads   This Week's Top Downloads: [IMAGE]Madonna - "Thunderpuss Mix" [IMAGE]Ice Cube - "$100 Bill Y'All" [IMAGE]Nickelback - "How You Remind Me" [IMAGE]Enya - "May It Be" [IMAGE]Kid Rock - "Forever" [IMAGE]Jewel - "Standing Still" [IMAGE]Pink Floyd - "Another Brick In The Wall" [IMAGE]Deftones - "Head Up"  Featured Jukeboxes: [IMAGE]Smashing Pumpkins - Greatest Hits [IMAGE]Dilated Peoples - Expansion Team Player & Video [IMAGE]Mick Jagger - Goddess In The Doorway  [IMAGE]    [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]      [IMAGE]     [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  10-15% Off SALE!   Shop this week at ARTISTdirect and save on all music and merch, including: [IMAGE]Neil Young - exclusive Tonight's The Night long-sleeve tees [IMAGE]matchbox twenty - hooded sweatshirts [IMAGE]Incubus - logo beanie, tees, and workshirts [IMAGE]Linkin Park - logo tees and new DVD [IMAGE]Stevie Nicks - embroidered jackets and shawls [IMAGE]Metallica - Action Figures  [IMAGE]Enter Coupon at Checkout 10% off $50 Coupon Code: xx050turkey 15% off $100 Coupon Code: xx100pilgrim   Plus, check out cool new threads from ADIO, Atticus, Pony, Volcom, Hurley  and more.  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  Top Videos   New Adds: [IMAGE]Alien Ant Farm - "Movies" (v.2) [IMAGE]Smash Mouth - "Pacific Coast Party" [IMAGE]Lifehouse - "Breathing" [IMAGE]The Avalanches - "Frontier Psychiatrist"  Viewer Faves: [IMAGE]Britney Spears - "I'm A Slave 4 U" [IMAGE]Linkin Park - "Crawling" [IMAGE]Enrique Iglesias - "Hero" [IMAGE]Dr. Dre - "Bad Intentions" from The Wash  [IMAGE]    [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  Click here to Un_Subscribe

-MKTFI:enUS:7xWAyr3MacAfucI18I20Ss T5Sl6/KO0dAtr6HSeVdorA-
[IMAGE]


you're dumb on infusion.

i don't remember, but i think you've got to give her the benefit of the doubt for her balls.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jai Hawker <JHawker@petersco.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:19 AM
To:	Richey, Cooper
Subject:	RE: Hi there...

Lunch at Infusion?

-----Original Message-----
From: Cooper.Richey@enron.com [mailto:Cooper.Richey@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:09 AM
To: JHawker@petersco.com
Subject: RE: Hi there...

nice.  do you remember her?

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   Jai Hawker <JHawker@petersco.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:08 AM
   To:     Richey, Cooper
   Subject:  FW: Hi there...

   Check this out.

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Smith, Jennifer [mailto:JenniferSmith@aec.ca]
   Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:00 AM
   To: 'jhawker@petersco.com'
   Subject: Hi there...

   Hi Jai,

   I'm in the middle of one of the most incredibly busy weeks I've ever
   had.
   But I couldn't possibly forget the guy who wore one of the most unique
   and
   enticing shirts I've ever seen...(we met last Saturday)

   Thought you might like to meet for lunch next week....

   Jenny

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


More fun for your file.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/21/2000 06:14
PM ---------------------------

"Thompson, Peter J." <peterthompson@akllp.com> on 12/21/2000 04:54:21 PM
To: "George Kutzschbach (E-mail)" <gkutzschbach@fulbright.com>
cc: "Kay Mann (E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>

Subject: FW: CA Development I

-----Original Message-----
From: Thompson, Peter J.
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 5:39 PM
To: Kay Mann (E-mail)
Cc: Kent. Shoemaker (E-mail); Lee. Johnson (E-mail); Pipitone, Paul;
Cobb, Chris
Subject: CA Development I

    Attached please find the most recent version of the CA Development I
Agreement and Exhibits as well as a blackline against the version
circulated on December 4.  I will be forwarding to Kay Mann the
execution copy that will incorporate both the agreement and exhibits
into one document, which will also include Exhibit H-2.
 <<CA Energy Development Agt - Comparison v. 2 to 4.DOC>>  <<CA
Development I Exhibits Comparison v 1 to 3.DOC>>  <<Exhibits to CA
Development I Energy Break-Out Agreement CISO1 12/15/00.DOC>>  <<break
out agreement for CIS01 (12/20/00).DOC>>


Thanks.  Sorry for the latest. Was on the road this morning.

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael.Alexander@sce.com [mailto:Michael.Alexander@sce.com]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 1:30 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: RE: I. 99-07-003 Draft Comments on the Revised Proposed
Decision

Jeff,

In general, I agree with you that absent market power price caps are bad
policy.  In this case, I believe we have crafted the settlement (and the
decision reinforces those sections, in fact, the reduction of market
concentration limits from 40% to 30% goes even further in this regard), so
that market power will not be a problem.  I have phoned Mike Day and
suggested that he craft his comments to include the caveat about market
power, and he indicated that would not be a problem.  With that change I
don't think we object to including the comments on price caps.  I am still
getting approval from the various powers that be, but hope to get that
soon.

Michael

--
Michael S. Alexander
Southern California Edison
Energy Supply and Management (ES&M)
626-302-2029
626-302-3254 (fax)

                    "Dasovich,
                    Jeff"                  To:     "MDay" <MDay@GMSSR.com>, "Amirault, Paul"
                    <Jeff.Dasovich@        <PaulAmirault@aec.ca>, "Jeff Dasovich  Enron SF"
                    enron.com>             <jdasovic@enron.com>, "Michael Alexander, SCE"
                                           <ALEXANMS@sce.com>, "Phil Davies, WGSI Calgary"
                    10/18/2001             <PhilDavies@aec.ca>, "Porter, Douglas K"
                    08:17 PM               <PORTERDK@sce.com>, "Hass, Glen"
                                           <Glen.Hass@enron.com>, "Steffes, James D."
                                           <James.D.Steffes@enron.com>, "Mara, Susan"
                                           <Susan.J.Mara@enron.com>
                                           cc:
                                           Subject:     RE: I. 99-07-003  Draft Comments on
                                           the Revised Proposed Decision

Mike:  Comments looks good.  My only comment is that, in our view, the
price cap (which would cover ALL capacity in the secondary market) is
simply bad economic policy and won't address any problems--in fact it
will only create problems. (From a practical perspective, I'm not even
sure that the Commission can successfully "regulate" prices in the
secondary market.)

Will the commission change the price cap provisions of the decision
based comments advising against them?  Very unlikely.

But when the caps create problems (and they will), I want to have been
on record advising the Commission of why caps are bad economic policy
and pointing out the bad outcomes that caps will cause.  I think that
it's very important to point out the downside of caps and to be on
record against them.

That said, I don't want the comments to be so negative as to cloud
support for the decision; nor do I think the Commission will change the
cap based on our comments.  Other than that, EES and ENA can sign on.
Anyone have any objections to pointing out the fact that price caps are
ill-advised?

Best,
Jeff

           -----Original Message-----
           From: MDay
           Sent: Thu 10/18/2001 8:43 PM
           To: 'Amirault, Paul'; 'Jeff Dasovich Enron SF'; 'Michael
Alexander, SCE'; 'Phil Davies, WGSI Calgary'; 'Porter, Douglas K'
           Cc:
           Subject: I. 99-07-003 Draft Comments on the Revised Proposed
Decision

            <<X28621.DOC>>

           Enclosed for your review are the draft comments on the Revised
Proposed
           Decision in the Gas Restructuring Investigation.  WGSI and Enron
have
           indicated a desire to file supportive comments.  Edison has
indicated an
           interest in reviewing our draft for the purpose of considering
joining in
           our comments.  Please send edited electronic versions with
underline and
           strikeout to MBD at this address no later than noon tomorrow.
These comments
           must be filed tomorrow before 5 pm.  I am sorry for the lateness
of the
           draft, but these are not extensive comments.  Except for the
little
           bombshell about extending commission jurisdiction over gas
marketers, I see
           little in the RPD to warrant our opposition.  Even if the
Commission
           proceeds with the jurisdictional grab, I believe it can be
overturned by the
           Court of Appeals.

           I look forward to your comments.

           Mike Day

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************