We actually did consider adding "short", but there is nothing on the site
which identifies where the "short description" is (obvious to us, but not
necessarily to the customer), so we decided to proceed without this (I
realise the arguments are not very strong either way). It was felt at the
time that "Product Description" would provide as much direction as "Product
Short Description", so the language for NA products has been implemented in
this way.

Dave

Edmund Cooper
03/17/2000 01:40 PM
To: Awais Omar/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Forster/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Dilworth/LON/ECT@ECT, Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Tokenized Reference periods

Fine.  If the dates are always going to be stated in the short description it
would make sense to add "short" between "product" and "description", unless
this causes a problem. Thanks, Edmund,

Awais Omar
03/17/2000 01:27 PM
To: Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Tokenized Reference periods

Edmund,  originated from Mark Taylor and Dave Forster wanted to use the same
phrase fro all tokenised periods.  Mark said this should be OK. The short
Description ont he Quotes page will show the product name together with the
period for the trsnacation.  The dates will change automatically each day
based on a rule set defiened within the databse for that product.  Thus int
he long description we refer the period to the dates shown in the short
description.

Awais

Edmund Cooper
03/17/2000 09:14 AM
To: Awais Omar/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Dilworth/LON/ECT@ECT, Enron London - EOL Product Control
Group/LON/ECT@ECT, Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Tokenized Reference periods

Awais,

Can you let me know the genesis of the phrase (in blue in Anna's email).

If we are going to go with this rather than what I had come up with intially
for the gas products I'd prefer if we said:

"The term of the Transaction shall correspond to the date(s) set forth in the
product short description on the website."

Thanks, Edmund

Anna Gardiner
03/17/2000 08:24 AM
To: Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Dilworth/LON/ECT@ECT, Awais Omar/LON/ECT@ECT, Enron London - EOL
Product Control Group/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Tokenized Reference periods

Edmund,

On the basis of the Gas periods supplied below, does this mean that you do or
do not agree with the changes to the Term of the Transaction text (in blue)?
Please let me know before I go ahead and ask the traders to start drafting
products.

"The term of the Transaction shall correspond to the date(s) set forth in the
Product description on the website"

Thanks

Anna

Edmund Cooper
16/03/2000 18:41
To: Anna Gardiner/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Tokenized Reference periods

Here was what I had come up with

Anna Gardiner
03/16/2000 06:38 PM
To: Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Awais Omar/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Dilworth/LON/ECT@ECT, Enron London - EOL
Product Control Group/LON/ECT@ECT, Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Tokenized Reference periods

Edmund

Please can you confirm that this complex description for Weekend UK Nat Gas
is correct.

"The term of the Transaction shall correspond to the date(s) set forth in the
Product description on the website. The Supply Period shall be for the gas
Days commencing on the Saturday and Sunday following the trade date and any
Friday and/or Monday, adjoining such Saturday and Sunday, which is not a
Banking Day."

As you will see from my emails below, I am trying to establish whether supply
period information should still appear in the descriptions for UK and Cont
Gas.  I have spoken to Jonathan Whitehead and he has said that he is happy as
long as legal has approved the descriptions.

I would appreciate it if you could let me know as soon as possible that this
info is correct.  I will then be able to go ahead and inform all traders that
they can set up their tokenised products.

Many thanks

Anna

---------------------- Forwarded by Anna Gardiner/LON/ECT on 16/03/2000 18:28
---------------------------

Anna Gardiner
15/03/2000 17:39
To: Awais Omar/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Dilworth/LON/ECT@ECT, Enron London - EOL Product Control
Group/LON/ECT@ECT, Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Tokenized Reference periods

Awais,

I have now made your requested changes in complex descriptions.  As mentioned
in email below, I was not sure whether you wanted to remove the supply period
information for UK and Cont Gas.  Mark suggested that I speak to Jonathan
Whitehead to confirm that this information be left in the complex
description.  Jonathan has said that he thinks that it should be there as
long as legal have approved it.

If the supply period text should be removed, please let me know and I will
remove it.  Once this has been confirmed, do you then want me to go ahead and
inform the traders that they can now start setting up their products with
tokenised periods?

Many thanks

Anna
---------------------- Forwarded by Anna Gardiner/LON/ECT on 15/03/2000 17:29
---------------------------

Anna Gardiner
15/03/2000 13:08
To: Mark Dilworth/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Enron London - EOL Product Control Group/LON/ECT@ECT, Awais
Omar/LON/ECT@ECT, Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Tokenized Reference periods

I have made the relevant changes in complex descriptions.  Before I go ahead
and inform the traders that they can set up their products for DA, BoM etc,
could you take a look at the descriptions for UK Gas and Belgian Gas.  I have
inserted the relevant term of transaction info ("The term of the Transaction
shall correspond to the date(s) set forth in the Product description on the
website") but have not taken out the information on Supply periods (The
Supply Period shall be for the gas Days commencing on the Saturday and Sunday
following the trade date and any Friday and/or Monday, adjoining such
Saturday and Sunday, which is not a Banking Day.). Does this info need to be
deleted, or should it remain in all complex descriptions for UK and Cont Gas?

Let me know and I will amend if necessary.  All other descriptions should now
read as per Awais's email.

Thanks

Anna
---------------------- Forwarded by Anna Gardiner/LON/ECT on 15/03/2000 12:53
---------------------------

Amita Gosalia
14/03/2000 15:29
To: Mark Dilworth/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Enron London - EOL Product Control Group/LON/ECT@ECT, Awais
Omar/LON/ECT@ECT, Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Tokenized Reference periods

Hi Mark

Lara and Anna will be on the case.

Rgds

A

Mark Dilworth
14/03/2000 09:22
To: Amita Gosalia/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Enron London - EOL Product Control Group/LON/ECT@ECT, Awais
Omar/LON/ECT@ECT, Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Tokenized Reference periods

amita

have you anyone who can look after this while arfie's away?

if not i can....(and I can help in any case)

F. A. B.

m

---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Dilworth/LON/ECT on 03/14/2000 09:20
AM ---------------------------
   Arfan Aziz                03/14/2000 12:36 AM

To: Awais Omar/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Dilworth/LON/ECT@ECT, Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron London - EOL
Product Control Group/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Tokenized Reference periods

Awais

I can confirm that the gas products all have the following phrase at the
beginning of the complex long description:

"The term of the Transaction shall be from the Effective Date to the
Termination Date (as stated in the Short Description). "

This has already been added - do you want it amended to ready the one you
specified below ??

Also it is not clear from your email below but can you comfirm that the Power
products do not require this description ?

In addition, I dont think I should be adding products for any of the traders
- they should be doing this themselves !  Also as I am in Sydney for the next
few weeks I wont get anytime when I am in the same time zone as them - could
you talk to them directly or email them as any responses from them to me will
be delayed by a day !

Thanks

Arfan

Awais Omar
10/03/2000 23:51
To: Jay Webb/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer deBoisblanc
Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Arfan Aziz/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: David Forster/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Dilworth/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Tokenized Reference periods

Jay,

Below is Latest Rule set for the tokenised reference periods.  If this is in
the correct format might be easier just to upload this in full into
production.  The new ones are coloured in yellow in the spreadsheet.

I n additon could you please also upload the rules for (i) Day Ahead Can Nat
Gas (Sumas/Hunt/S2) and (ii) BoM Can Nat GAs (Sumas/Hunt/S2) into Test as
well.  I have created two products 4293 and 4294 in test.  So once the rules
have been inserted can you please also run the relevant part of the scheduler
to convert the abbreviationot date so that Jennifer can then test bridging of
these Canadian products.

Dale, Arfan

Can you please check the comples description for each of the tokenised
peirods listed in the spreadsheet above reads:

"The term of the Transaction shall correspond to the date(s) set forth in the
Product description on the website."

We have decided that it would be easier for consistency to have this in all
descriptions.  For the Power ones I believe the time or loadshape is
referenced in another part of the description and so does not need to be
referenced here, e.g. in Uk power ones says fro 11 p.m. on trade day to 11
p.m. ont he following day for Day Ahead.

You need to both then ask, unless you already know, what products traders
want as tokenised and set these up for them.  They can then start using the
new tokenised products the day after they have been set up as the scheduler
needs to run overnight to convert the tokenised abbreviation to the correct
dates.

Dale,

Can you please let Patrice Thurston and Kevin Ruscittit that their product
9877, the one I set up as the Balance of Month, shoudl be OK to use now as
Jennifer's bridge testing was successful for US Gas and US Power.

The only thing missing is teh treatment for Holidays for Canadian Gas, I have
sent an email to Grant Oh, tel 403 977 6778 in Calgary,  requesting this
info.  Once you have please put this into same format as in the above
spreadsheet in sheet labelled "Specific Rules" and give to Jay to Upload.

Jennifer,

Please follow up with Jay when therules for Canada Gas have been inserted
into Test database and also when the correct dates are shown for the products
4293 and 4294 you can then do bridge testing for Canada Gas.

Thurderbirds are go!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Awais


Our open season witness with be Jean Zaiontz of BP Amoco Corporation.
Thanks.

Susan.Scott@enron.com wrote:

> Amie or Evie, Transwestern would like to reference IP's open season
> testimony in Jeff Fawcett's testimony.  What is the name of your witness?
> Just trying to be as accurate as possible.  Thanks.
>
> Susan Scott
> Transwestern Pipeline Company
> (713) 853-0596
> Susan.Scott@enron.com


Robert, our CNG/Cove Point meter is set up and we can fix the 19th.  I just
entered deal 253505 moving gas from CNG to Cove Point.

thanks


Wrong Susan again...try typing sscott3@enron.com (that's her short email address)...mine is sscott5@enron.com.  If you see the middle initial "M" pop up in the address, you've got the wrong Susan Scott.

Thanks

Linda J Noske
04/18/2001 09:44 AM
To:	Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	Need some information

Again, may I get your office location?

You're not a new employee right, just transferrring in, correct?  If so, which business unit?

Thanks!


Geoff,

The vesting for restricted stock is 1/3 on first anniversary of signing, and 1/3 on the next two anniversaries of signing.

Let me know if you have any other questions.

Michelle

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Michelle Cash
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3823
Houston, Texas  77002
(713) 853-6401
michelle.cash@enron.com

This message may contain confidential information that is protected by the attorney-client and/or work product privileges.


I called out muni desk to have them take a look at the current munis avaiable
that looked best at this time to invest $50,000 going out to 30 years for
you.  The following is what they came up with....

Pecos Co TX Cert of Obl w/a Coupon 5.5% Matures in 02/01/11 callable at par
on 02/01/07 offered at $101.964 - AAA rated

Brownsville Util Rev w/a coupon of 5.25% maturing in 09/01/15 callable at par
on 09/01/05 offered at $97.425 - AAA rated

Alvin TX ISD PSF w/a coupon of 5.75% maturing in 08/15/22 callable at par on
08/15/10 offered at par - AAA rated

Houston TX Air Revs w/a coupon of 5.00% maturing in 07/01/28 callable at par
on 07/01/08 offered at 86.479 - AAA rated

Remember, these are subject to change, but if these interest you and they are
not still available, I will see if there is something comparable.

Talk to you soon.  Please call me with any questions.  Thanks, Julie


Set up with Ana Alcantara  X3-5737 - 3/16/00. jar


G$ - Please call me this am re:attached open season package for PGT.

Bids are due tomorrow -

Thanks

Stephanie
---------------------- Forwarded by Stephanie Miller/Corp/Enron on 02/14/2001
08:22 AM ---------------------------

"Schoene, Jim" <Jim.Schoene@neg.pge.com> on 02/13/2001 09:31:36 AM
To: "Stephanie Miller (E-mail)" <stephanie.miller@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: The Whole package

Attached is the latest entire package.  You can view in "page layout mode"
to get the logo's and disclaimers shown.

 <<Open Season Package2-12-01.doc>>

PG&E National Energy Group and any other
company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or
logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, the regulated California utility.  Neither
PG&E National Energy Group nor these other
referenced companies are regulated by the California Public
Utilities Commission.  Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
do not have to buy products from these companies in order
to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.

 - Open Season Package2-12-01.doc


Notice #  02-68
March 5,  2002

To:               All  NYMEX Division Members
                    NYMEX Division Member Firms

From:          J. Robert Collins, Jr., President

Re:        Request for assistance in communicating the importance of the  weekly natural gas storage report to the Department of  Energy

The U.S. Department of  Energy Energy Information Administration (EIA) will take over the release of the  weekly natural gas storage report from the American Gas Association this  spring.  Since its inception in  1993, the survey has been an important source of on-going changes in the supply  and demand of natural gas, and plays an important role in the transparency of  the market.  While at the present  time the report is released during open outcry trading hours, the Exchange has  reason to believe that the EIA is leaning toward releasing the numbers in the  late afternoon or on the weekend.   Officials at the EIA have said they believe this will minimize the  volatility in the marketplace.

It is the firm belief of the  Exchange that releasing the weekly storage report in the off-hours will only  increase market volatility upon the resumption of open outcry trading, will  limit market transparency, and would put many market participants at a  disadvantage.  In the interests of  market transparency and fairness, the Exchange is concerned that the report be  released during open outcry trading hours when the market is most liquid, and  has suggested a time of 10:30 A.M.

The Exchange has made  its position known in written comments to the Department of Energy.  EIA Administrator Mary Hutzler has said  that the Exchange appears to be the only interested party that feels strongly  about releasing the data during regular trading hours.

It is important that market  participants, particularly commercial entities, contact the EIA on this  issue.  I urge you and your  customers to call Ms. Hutzler, (202) 586-6351, and cordially explain how  important it is to have the information made available during regular daytime  trading hours, preferably 10:30 A.M.  Please make the following  points:

?  The weekly inventory report is an  important source of information regarding changes in the supply and demand of  natural gas.  It is currently  released to coincide with regular daytime trading hours of the natural gas  futures market.

?  Wide participation in the New York  Mercantile Exchange natural gas futures market by commercial buyers and sellers  from all segments of the industry has made the futures contract the North  American pricing benchmark.

?  The release of the report in the late in  the afternoon, or early in the morning when the trading floor is closed, will  put most market participants at a distinct disadvantage to those firms who have  trading desks manned round the clock.

?  The release of the information in the  off hours could also increase volatility at the opening of the market -- having  the opposite of the desired effect.

?  In the interests of fairness and market  transparency, it is vital that the statistics continue to be released according  to current practice, during daytime trading; one of the most active times of the  day is shortly after the market open, or about 10:30 A.M.

If you prefer to fax Ms.  Hutzler at (202) 586-0329, or email mary.hutzler@eia.doe.gov, we have provided  the following recommended language:

Ms. Mary  Hutzler
Administrator
Energy Information  Administration
U.S. Department of Energy
Washington, DC

Dear Ms.  Hutzler:

Since its inception in 1993,  the American Gas Association's weekly inventory survey has been an important  source of on-going changes in the supply and demand of natural gas, and has  fulfilled an important role in assuring the transparency of the market.  We understand that the reporting  function will be assumed by the Energy Information Administration this spring,  and wish to urge that in the interest of market fairness and efficiency that the  weekly report continue to be released during regular daytime trading hours of  the natural gas futures market.

Wide participation in the  New York Mercantile Exchange natural gas futures market by commercial buyers and  sellers of gas from all segments of the industry has made the futures contract  the North American pricing benchmark for this important energy resource.  For this reason, we feel that it is  vital that the statistics continue to be released according to current practice,  during regular daytime trading hours, the most active trading period.  Typically, one of the most active times  of the day would be shortly after the market opens, about 10:30 A.M.

A release of the inventory  figures in the late afternoon or on the weekend would primarily benefit the  major companies that can afford to man round-the-clock trading desks because  they will be able to react immediately, while smaller firms will have to wait  until the market opens on the following business day.  It has been our experience that the  release of market-moving news in the off-hours often increases market volatility  at the market open.

We urge you to maintain the  current practice of releasing this information during daytime  trading.

Thank you for your  consideration.

                                                                                Sincerely,


As I mentioned in my voice mail, please check up on the signing bonus we
agreed to pay Tony Pryor.  He didn't get it and we need to get that fixed
asap.  I'll be at 37555 tomorrow and back in Omaha Monday.  If you learn
something tomorrow and can't get ahold of me, please leave me a voice mail.
Thanks.  DF


Per your request.  Mark
----- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 04/16/2001 04:34 PM -----

	Julia Murray
	04/12/2001 06:37 PM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Topics for General Counsel Meeting

Mark   Attached is a memo to Jim Derrick suggesting topics for discussion at
the upcoming General Counsel meeting in May.   Please either give me your
comments and I will send or you can forward on to Jim.  Thanks.  Julia

Julia Heintz Murray
Enron Wholesale Services
Enron Industrial Markets LLC
1400 Smith Street, EB3838
Houston, TX  77002
(713) 853-4794
Fax:  (713) 646-3393
julia.murray@enron.com


I will be out of the office until Monday, January 28, 2002.


Vintage should be 93730.

Julie Meyers
12/20/99 02:27 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Evergreen deals

Look at comments below.

Julie

Daren J Farmer
12/20/99 01:43 PM
To: Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Evergreen deals

Julie,

I need to know if the following deals have evergreen provisions to roll into
Jan 2000.

Cokinos / 9676  95912 - No this is a GTC Firm contract, deal expires with
contract
Cokinos / 6373  128952 - This is a GTC Spot
Coral / 4120  93883 - This is on a Single Transaction contract, we would need
to check with the trader
Encina / 6392  93487 - Yes, this is a committed reserve.  I marked the
evergreen flag.
Midcoast / 5097  92956 - No, GTC 1st Purchaser, deal expires with contract.
United O&M / 5053 93728 - No, this deal was moved to the Wellhead portfolio
for January, but the deal was terminated per legal.
Vintage / 2540  93750 - Not the right deal number.

Thanks.

D


I know we have a lot :-)  just send us whatever you think we need to know for this trade work sheet project

dluu

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	White, Stacey W.
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 8:31 AM
To:	Luu, Duong
Subject:	RE: Trader Position Sheet

Since we talked about a lot of different spreadsheets, can you give me some more guidance on what was included in the spreadsheet I talked about so I will send you the correct one.

Stacey

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Luu, Duong
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 5:24 PM
To:	White, Stacey W.
Cc:	Nat, Steve
Subject:	Trader Position Sheet

Stacey,

Would you please send us trader's position sheet that you mention in our meeting few days ago
Currently, we work on building a prototype for traders.

Regards,
dluu


John:

The reason for the large Vega numbers on the TopPage report, while there were
no corresponding changes in the Volatility curves, is due to the change in
the mid. price for the current day versus the prior day. The corresponding
volatility skews that are added to the vols. for the 2 days is causing the
large vega numbers.

For example, for deal number QV5087.2 (exp. date 01-Jan-2002):

  Current Day  Prior Day
Mid. Price 5.885   5.772
Strike Price 3.5   3.5
Mid - Strike 2.385   2.272
Vol.  0.555   0.555
Vol. Skew 0.03816   0.03635
Actual Vol. 0.59316   0.59135

Option value for prior day using current day's vol. =  7,616,935
Option value for prior day using prior day's vol.     =  7,547,238
Vega                =  69,697

Thank you,
Jeremy
x3-0573


Please review and respond.


Please note that the time of the Friday afternoon staff meeting has been
changed for this week only.  Please mark the following on your calendar:

  Date:    Friday, August 11, 2000

  Time:    3:30 pm - 5:30 pm

  Location:   EB 30C1

  Topic:   Combined Staff and Budget Meeting

If you have any questions/conflicts, please feel free to call Kay (30643) or
me.

Thanks!

Beverly
57857


You got it.

From: Jeff Dasovich on 05/15/2001 05:24 PM CDT
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Plan B

----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 05/15/2001 05:23 PM -----

	Kelli Clifton <kelli@ppallc.com>
	05/15/2001 03:01 PM

		 To: "'jeff.dasovich@enron.com'" <jeff.dasovich@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Plan B

Per a request from Theo Pahos (on behalf of Mirant), can you please fax
him a copy of Plan B at (916) 441-3549.

Kelli Clifton
Public Policy Advocates
(916) 441-0702


Here is the letter and an attachment that you will need to complete to move
the CNG meters from the CES' pools to ENA's pools.  There are some
highlighted notes that I put on the letter that tells you what you need to
do.    You will probably just want to attach a spreadsheet list of the meters
that you are moving for each letter.  The list will need to include the
producer information also.  You will need to do one of these letters for all
the agg point pools.  I filled out everything for you on the attachment all
you need to do is make sure you attach the appropriate list of meters.

Please call me if you have any questions.  (614) 718-6340

Thanks,
Heidi


I am advised that some of you have not exhibited the requisite amount of
"pep."  For lawyers and paralegals, you need to pick your reviewers online if
you haven't already done so.  5 or 6 would be sufficient althought the
computer lets you pick up to 10.  For those of you who picked more than 5 or
6 I have reduced that number, based on my thoughts about which of your chosen
reviewers have had the most direct contact with you and are most likely to
give a thorough review.  Let me know if you think I really blew it.  For
secretaries, the online stuff is optional.  If you don't use it, I will
solicit input from the people you work with like I have in the past and
consolidate it with my own comments on one form.   Thanks.  DF


Hi Kate
This deal has 0 volume.  Is it correct?  if so, do we need to confirm it?
Thanks!
Kim


The following items were discussed in this week's ETS and Corporate change control...
July 11
Beginning today and lasting through 7/13 at 5:00 p.m., the Corporate print team will make changes and verify the following printers resolve to the host names: Zachary, Redfish, Bluefish, Davie, Teddy, Jinmeycricket, Mac, Pastry, Partyviking, Monkey, Peasant, Blackjack, Xman, Aeros, Paris, Gumpy, Duplex, Nodeal, Momoney, Moolah, Littlebuddy, Itsec, Tortilla, Irms, Crawfish, Avenel, Joker, Apache, PMO, Kidrock, Whocares, CorpAccountingG, Bigbertha, Nodoz, Hullabaluh, Banait, Tajmahal, Vagon, Bambam, Mirage, FunMachine, Lunchbox, Seed, Iron, Blackgold, Honeybee, Gas, Groovy, HP1801, Zeon, Niagara, Valentine, Carbon, Pilotlight, Gasstove, Sodium, GeorgeStrait, Endeavor, Uranus, Skylab, Hubble, Mariner, Voyager, Challenger, Pathfinder, Viking, Tatiana, Gemini, Mountain, Apollo, Magellan, Discovery, Columbia, Catfish, Flounder.  No impact is expected.
July 12
From 11:30 p.m. through 7/13 at 3:00 a.m., the ETS server team will move the existing EMC box approximately six inches.  During this maintenance Prestige Flooring will install additional floor pedestals in preparation for installation of the new EMC box.  No impact is expected.
July 13
From 3:30 - 5:00 p.m., Telephony services will transition a second fiber ring from in-house fiber to MAN.  This maintenance will create redundancy for the ATM Network for telephone systems at EB, 3AC and ECS.  No impact is expected.
July 13
From 5:00 - 5:15 p.m., the Corporate Server team will migrate one General Purpose 2 Terminal Server from Oracle 7.3 to Oracle 8i and put it in the GP2 cluster as the primary server.  All applications on Terminal Server are Oracle 8i compliant.  Applications being developed require Oracle 8i, and current Terminal Server General Purpose cluster is running Oracle 7.3.  No impact to ETS users is expected.
July 13
From 6:00 p.m. through 7/15 at 5:00 a.m., Facilities will perform the monthly routing maintenance on the EB34 data center's CRAC (Computer Room Air Conditioning) units.  This maintenance includes checking/changing air filters and belts, and cleaning out condensation drip pans, pipes, and drains.  No impact is expected.

July 14
From 7:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m., Facilities will install water piping to supply emergency backup CRAC units in the EB34 data center to provide emergency cooling capacity.   No impact is expected.

July 14
From 7:00 a.m. - 7:00 p.m., Facilities will install new power whips on the 34th floor in the ETS server area.  While no outage is expected, due to the nature of the work, the possibility of a power disruption does exist.

July 14
From 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m., Facilities will switch the EB34 data center's cooling loop to the backup roof chillers to verify functionality.  If a partial failure of chillers occurs, problem identification and resolution will proceed with data center load still on roof chillers (which could result in a gradual temperature rise in the data center until resolution is complete).  A protracted run of the chillers will continue through Saturday.  No impact is expected.

July 14
From 9:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m., Telephony services will add Caller ID Name & Number to ISDN PRI Trunks on EB and 3AC telephone systems. Trunk groups will be taken down in stages so that back-up trunk groups will still send and receive calls.   Software and hardware changes will be made to trunk groups and circuit boards to allow for new caller-id protocol.  Intermittent service disruptions could occur including fast busies, no dial tone, and call disconnects if you are on a trunk that is busied out during the change.  If you are disconnected, redial to hit a back-up trunk.  These changes will not affect long distance calls.  Please call Harold Williams at x58917 or Cindy Siniard x30558 with any questions.

July 14
From 7:00 - 11:00 p.m., Enron Network Services will connect the core Enron Center North and Enron Center South switches.  No impact is expected.

July 16
From 6:00 p.m. through 7/17 at 10:00 p.m., Facilities will temporarily remove the door from EB3460 to allow access for the new ETS EMC equipment.  Plastic will be installed to control environmentals.  A guard will be placed 24 x 7 while door is down.  All traffic will be routed to EB3450 doorway.  After ETS EMC equipment is moved in on Tuesday 7/17/01, in the evening the door will be reinstalled.

July 20
From 9:00 p.m. through 7/21 at 1:00 a.m., the Messaging team will reboot servers as part of their normal maintenance schedule.  Users on the mailservers listed below may see intermittent outages during the reboots:  ECTHOU-LN3, ECTHOU-LN4, ECTHOU-LN5, ECTHOU-LN6, ECTHOU-LN7, ECTHOU_LN2, NAHOU-LN10, NAHOU-LN11, NAHOU-LN12, NAHOU-LN14, NAHOU-LN8, NAHOU-LN9.

ETS Solution Center - Houston, at 713-345-4745
ETS Solution Center - Omaha, at 402-398-7454


All

For those of you who are married you should expect or already have received additional information sent to your home address by Fragomen.  This information relates to your  spouse's visa (if required).   Please ensure that this is signed and returned immediately to Fragomen.  I am more than happy to fedex it on your behalf.  For those of you who have sent it back directly - please send me an e:mail confirming this.

Kind regards,

Karen
x54667


WELCOME BACK
----- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 06/04/2001 10:49 AM -----

	Melba Lozano/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/25/2001 04:35 PM

		 To: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank Hayden/ENRON@enronXgate, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Robert B Cass/ENRON@enronXgate, Carlos Alatorre/ENRON@enronXgate
		 Subject: FW: US Power Phy Options - Approval Needed

Please approve the attached Product Types.
Melba Lozano
713-345-8986
713-646-8511 Fax
713-698-4847 Pager

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Lozano, Melba
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 11:37 AM
To: Sager, Elizabeth; Moran, Tom; Hayden, Frank; White, Stacey; Blumenthal,
Jeff; Musch, Susan; Gockerman, Matthew F.; Taylor, Mark
Cc: Cass, Robert B.; Walker, Chris; Meredith, Kevin; Alatorre, Carlos; Lees,
Lisa; Sever, Stephanie; O'day, Karen; Jones, Tana; Lambert, Karen; Lombardi,
Kelly
Subject: US Power Phy Options - Approval Needed
Importance: High

Your review and approval of the following product types in the EOL
Datamanager is needed (for directions on approval , please see steps for
approval at the bottom of this e-mail). If you have any questions please call
me at ext. 58986.
******** DO NOT APPROVE PRODUCT TYPES BETWEEN THE HOURS OF 6AM -
11AM***********

Traders:  Harry Arora and Robert Stalford
Product
Names:  US East Power Phy Option Call (2077)
  US East Power Phy Option Put (2078)

US Pwr Phy Opt  PJM-W EPXXX Jul01 USD/MWh
A US Power Transaction with Enron Power Marketing, Inc., under which the Put
Option Buyer has the right, but not the obligation, to elect on the Exercise
Date to schedule and deliver, and the Put Option Seller would have the
obligation to schedule, receive and pay for at the Strike Price, a quantity
of firm energy equal to the Hourly Quantity for each applicable hour during
the term of the transaction.  The Strike Price shall be as set forth in the
Product description on the Website.  As consideration for this right, the Put
Option Buyer shall be required to pay to the Put Option Seller the Premium
which shall be equal to the product of (i) the price submitted by
Counterparty via EnronOnline, multiplied by (ii) the total number of hours
during the term of the transaction, multiplied by (iii) the Hourly Quantity.
The Payment Date for the Premium shall be within two (2) business days of the
Transaction Date. The Option style and type shall be a monthly European Put
("EP").
The transaction is for the applicable hours as set forth herein on each
Delivery Day for the Effective Date 01 Jul 2001 to the Termination Date 31
Jul 2001.

The transaction is for delivery or receipt of energy at the PJM Western Hub.

The price is quoted in US Dollars per unit of volume, which will be the
Contractual Currency. The unit of measure against which the price is quoted
shall be megawatt-hours (MWh) and the quantity shown shall be in MW's
delivered in each applicable hour for the duration of the Transaction (the
"Hourly Quantity').

In order to exercise the Option, the Option Buyer shall provide telephonic
notice to the Option Seller prior to 10:00 am (Eastern Prevailing Time) on
the Exercise Date.  The Exercise Date shall be the second penultimate NERC
business day of the month prior to the month in which the term commences.

The transaction is for on-peak ("Peak") hours on each Delivery Day beginning
with the hour ending 0800 (7:00 am) and concluding with the hour ending 2300
(11:00 pm) Eastern Prevailing Time. "Delivery Day" means a day during the
term of the transaction that is a Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, or
Friday, excluding any day that is a NERC holiday.

US Pwr Phy Opt  PJM-W ECXXX Jul01 USD/MWh
A US Power Transaction with Enron Power Marketing, Inc., under which the Call
Option Buyer has the right, but not the obligation, to elect on the Exercise
Date to schedule, receive and pay for at the Strike Price, and the Call
Option Seller would have the obligation to schedule and deliver, a quantity
of firm energy equal to the Hourly Quantity for each applicable hour during
the term of the transaction. The Strike Price shall be as set forth in the
Product description on the Website. As consideration for this right, the Call
Option Buyer shall be required to pay to the Call Option Seller the Premium
which shall be equal to the product of (i) the price submitted by
Counterparty via EnronOnline, multiplied by (ii) the total number of hours
during the term of the transaction, multiplied by (iii) the Hourly Quantity.
The Payment Date for the Premium shall be within two (2) business days of the
Transaction Date. The Option style and type shall be a monthly European Call
("EC").

The transaction is for the applicable hours as set forth herein on each
Delivery Day for the Effective Date 01 Jul 2001 to the Termination Date 31
Jul 2001.

The transaction is for delivery or receipt of energy at the PJM Western Hub.

The price is quoted in US Dollars per unit of volume, which will be the
Contractual Currency. The unit of measure against which the price is quoted
shall be megawatt-hours (MWh) and the quantity shown shall be in MW's
delivered in each applicable hour for the duration of the Transaction (the
"Hourly Quantity').

In order to exercise the Option, the Option Buyer shall provide telephonic
notice to the Option Seller prior to 10:00 am (Eastern Prevailing Time) on
the Exercise Date.  The Exercise Date shall be the second penultimate NERC
business day of the month prior to the month in which the term commences.

The transaction is for on-peak ("Peak") hours on each Delivery Day beginning
with the hour ending 0800 (7:00 am) and concluding with the hour ending 2300
(11:00 pm) Eastern Prevailing Time. "Delivery Day" means a day during the
term of the transaction that is a Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, or
Friday, excluding any day that is a NERC holiday.
==============================================================================

STEPS FOR APPROVAL:

click the  START button
select  PROGRAMS
select  TEST APPLICATIONS
select ENRONONLINE CLUSTER(PROD)
 PROCEED WITH USUAL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click the Enron Online Production Cluster "START" button
select EnronOnLine (this is the EOL Datamanager)
 PROCEED WITH EOL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click on the "+" for EnronOnLine
click on the "+" for Product Types
click on the "+" for "Partially Approved"
select the product requiring review as stated in e-mail above
Right "mouse" click on "properties" to view product set-up


We would like to hold a conference call to field any questions, address
concerns and solicit feedback before the 10 Min. Settlement Market
Simulation begins in July.

Friday 6/23/00 @ 1000 PDT - 1100 PDT
Conference Number 877-670-4111
Passcode 246870

Jim Blatchford
Client Relations
Cal ISO
916.608.7051


TX SET,

The Version 1.5 workgroup meet on Friday 2/01 in Austin.  Here are the notes
from that meeting.

The following people have actions items. Please read the attached notes to
see what you are action items are.

Don Bender
Susan Neel
Johnny Roberts
Paul McKinney
Isabel Flores
Cherly Mosley
Dave Odle
Sonya Howell
John Hudson

 <<V 15_2_1.doc>>

Also,
Here is the 1.5 presentation that Susan Neel gave at RMS.

 <<Version 1.5latest.ppt>>

If you have any comments or questions please feel free to contact me.

Thanks
Rita Morales
exolink corporation
wk: 972 538-6983
cell: 972 816-2118

 - V 15_2_1.doc
 - Version 1.5latest.ppt


Please decrease deliveries to Eastrans to 0 MMBtu/dy effective 11/15/00 and
maintain at 0 until further notified.

The redeliveries will be 0 as well.

The Fuels Cotton Valley gas will not be priced per the Transaction
Agreement for 11/15/00 - 11/30/00.  This gas will be sold to HPL at
$5.60/MMBtu in a separate gas purchase agreement.


Dear Sandra,

I sincerely apologize if I offended you in any way Wednesday evening.  That
was certainly never my intention. I let my competitive emotions take over. I
was attempting to compare myself with other brokers not any specific shop.
If I singled certain brokers out that was not my intention.  I was honestly
trying to stress that I really work hard to earn the business.

I can truly say that I slept very little that night reflecting on things
that were discussed in our dinner.  After pondering the discussion about the
firmness of physical gas, I was afraid that I did not communicate my point
well and insulted your intelligence and your ability to judge the
intelligence of your brokers.  I certainly would never purposely do that. I
respect your reputation in the market and your knowledge of the market. Upon
reflection of the conversation, I did not communicate my points concerning
physical, and I cannot say enough that it was not my intention to insult you
(whether you work at Enron or not).

I have reviewed the conversation with Steve and Jon (Ray is at lunch), and I
can honestly say I was trying to point out Enron's strength in the
marketplace.  I chose the West as the example because of the volatility.  I
certainly meant it on how the market has changed; NOT how Enron manipulates
the market or is putting traders out of jobs.

I am embarrassed that I lost my composure.  I felt you were trying to
challenge our group to raise our level of game (which you did).  I did not
mean to dominate the conversation from Natsource's point of view.  Steve and
I agreed that we both could have handled the discussions much better.  I do
not blame Steve as my boss or Jon as the desk head for not stopping the
conversation.  I am an adult and a professional so I take full
responsibility. As brokers, our job is to communicate.  Clearly, we failed
in this regard.

I obviously would like to make it up to you and your firm.  I hope my lack
of composure does not cost my entire firm any of Enron's business.  I hope I
can work through the issues I created for the Gulf desk.  I will take it
personally to take your points about our desk and make them happen.  I do
not want you uncomfortable with anyone who speaks with you.  Your respect
for Ray is obvious, and I will try to support whatever you decide to the
fullest.

Sincerely,

Aaron


i left you a message regarding hubbard and want to make sure you coordinate
with susan scott as well.

thanks!

jamie


Charlie,

Thanks a lot. It was a very quick response.
Steve Horn was greatly impressed.

Vince

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  V Charles Weldon                           12/05/2000 11:07 AM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Bloomberg Request

Vince,

Mr. Horn's request has been taken care of.  He has the data he wanted and
knows how to call it up on his Bloomberg terminal in the future.

Charlie


Return-Path: <faizs@texaco.com>
Received: from  rly-xd02.mx.aol.com (rly-xd02.mail.aol.com [172.20.105.167])
by air-xd04.mail.aol.com (v77.14) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 11:00:13 -0500
Received: from  texsmtp1.texaco.com (texsmtp1.texaco.com [144.5.4.22]) by
rly-xd02.mx.aol.com (v77.27) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 10:59:55 -0500
Received: from msx01099.boc.texaco.com ([10.96.52.29]) by texsmtp1.texaco.com
(Pro-8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA20197 for <vkaminski@aol.com>; Wed, 13
Dec 2000 10:00:57 -0600 (CST)
Received: by msx01099.boc.texaco.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
id <YZDHLQMH>; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 09:50:39 -0600
Message-ID: <6345EAD5ED02D3118CD100805FBBA0D70316A175@MSX01001>
From: "Faiz, Soussan" <faizs@texaco.com>
To: "'Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
Cc: vkaminski@aol.com
Subject: RE: Houston visit
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 09:50:32 -0600
Return-Receipt-To: "Faiz, Soussan" <faizs@texaco.com>
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)

Hi Vince,

Sorry that we couldn't meet in Houston.  Hope your Philadelphia trip was
fruitful and you didn't suffer from weather related flight delays on your
way back to Houston.  Your phone message stated that you may be coming to NY
in Jan. 2001.  That's great & we should definitely plan to see each other in
NY, unless I come to Houston first.  I'd, however, appreciate a brief chat
today and pls call me if you schedule permits.

I'll be heading out to London tomorrow (mainly for the holidays) and won't
be back to the office until Thurs. 1/4, however, I'll be checking my phone-
and e-mail occasionally during the trip.

If today is not convenient, pls call me @ home tomorrow morning until
11:00am (NY time) and otherwise, pls offer another suitable time next week,
your tel. # , and I can call you from London.

Have a great and a very happy holiday season.

Best regards,

Soussan,
914 253 4187 (work)
203 966 7123 (home)

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com [mailto:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
Sent:   Wednesday, November 29, 2000 9:02 AM
To: faizs@texaco.com
Cc: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com; vkaminski@aol.com
Subject:    RE: Houston visit

Soussan,

It seems we have planned for all contingencies.
Look forward to meeting you next week.

Vince

"Faiz, Soussan" <faizs@texaco.com> on 11/28/2000 06:51:51 PM

To:   "'Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  RE: Houston visit

Vince,

Your suggested arrangement is perfect with me and I love both Italian or
Steak... the choice is yours.  I really look forward to our meeting & I
will
be @ the hotel's reception area on time.  It's great that I have your
cell-phone...as a contingency, and just in case you needed to call me, it's
best to leave me a message @ my phone # @ work.

Soussan
914 253 4187

 -----Original Message-----
From:     Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com [mailto:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
Sent:     Tuesday, November 28, 2000 9:39 AM
To:  faizs@texaco.com
Cc:  Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com; vkaminski@aol.com
Subject:  RE: Houston visit

Soussan,

Let's meet at Westin Oaks next to the reception around 6:30 p.m. Thursday.
There are several nice restaurants within a walking distance to the
Galleria.
I shall make a reservation (is Italian or a steakhouse OK?).

You can reach me on Thursday at my cell phone 713 410 5396.

Look forward to meeting you.

Vince

"Faiz, Soussan" <faizs@texaco.com> on 11/27/2000 04:37:30 PM

To:   "'Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  RE: Houston visit

Great!  I look forward to our dinner on Thurs. 12/7 evening.  Hopefully
your
flight will be on time... although having watched 60 minutes last night and
suffered from a # of delays lately, let's hope that the "weather blame"
doesn't get in the way.  It's best to leave me a message @ my usual work #
on Thurs., 914 253 4187, ... I can easily check it in Houston.

I'll be staying @ the Westin Oaks in The Galleria... any preferred place
that I can book (& for what time)??  Coming over to down town won't be a
problem for me either.

Will be great to see you again.
Soussan
914 253 4187

 -----Original Message-----
From:     Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com [mailto:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
Sent:     Monday, November 27, 2000 12:10 PM
To:  faizs@texaco.com
Cc:  Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
Subject:  Re: Houston visit

Soussan,

Thanks for your message. It would be great to meet you when you come to
Houston.
 I shall be in town on December 7,  flying back from Philly in the morning.
Assuming that the flight is on schedule, I shall be available for dinner.
Please, let me know how I can contact you on Thursday, December the 7th,
to confirm.

Look forward to meeting you.

Vince

"Faiz, Soussan" <faizs@texaco.com> on 11/26/2000 09:04:01 PM

To:   "'Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  Houston visit

Dear Vince,

Greetings from NY and hope that all is well and you had a great
Thanksgiving.  I'll be coming to Houston for 12/6-12/7 and hope you are
available either evening for dinner.  Would be great to see you again and
catch up with the latest... I really enjoyed my visit last April, your
insights, and the risk book you gave me.

I do hope you're available to meet and pls let me know which evening suits
you better.

Best,
Soussan Faiz
Texaco Inc.
914 253 4187


If the NDA is the Confidentiality Agreement for the Energy Trading Platform
(group of six?), I have marked it up with only those revisions I thought
essential (having discussed them with Andy) and am now waiting to hear back
regarding where I should send it (have left voice mail for Greg and Andy is
checking).

If the NDA is something else, please let me know.

	Louise Kitchen
	05/16/2000 06:10 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: What happened with the NDA?


FYI........we have just sent SEMCO our Statement of Qualification along with our annual report, analysts reports and some nice marketing material.  Here's a soft copy of the qualification statement that was sent.

Best,
Di


Notice No. 01-438
December 19, 2001

TO:		ALL EXCHANGE MEMBERS / MEMBER FIRMS
		ALL CLEARING MEMBERS

FROM:		J. ROBERT COLLINS, JR., PRESIDENT

RE:		EXCHANGE TO INTRODUCE STRIP TRADING IN HENRY HUB SWAPS ON
NYMEX ACCESS
 BEGINNING 			TOMORROW

The Exchange today announced that it would introduce strip trading
functionality for the first 36 listed months of its Henry Hub natural gas
swaps contract beginning tomorrow.

In order to prepare the NYMEX ACCESS
 electronic trading system, the
web-based platform on which the contract trades, trading in Henry Hub swaps
will not be available from 9 AM until 3:15 PM tomorrow.

Strip trading functionality will enable market participants to execute a
trade for anywhere from two to 36 consecutive months at a single price.

Should you have any questions or require any further information, please
contact exchangeinfo@nymex.com


Sorry, slightly revised version. Thanks, Edmund

Edmund Cooper
06/29/2000 05:04 PM
To: Lara Fields/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Metals counterparties approval

Herewith revised approval list.

Tana will revert with an update on US counterparties some of which will need
to be switched to read-only.

Thanks,

Edmund


You would not need to amend the ISDA.  Payment Dates are stated in the
confirmations.  Regarding your item 4, you might wish to talk to Sara
concerning the history of the payment date as 5th after determinable.  The
issue has been discussed often over the years between settlements and
treasury.  Mary

Cordially,
Mary Cook
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com

	Peter Keohane
	Sent by: Sharon Crawford
	02/08/2001 03:11 PM

		 To: Peggy Hedstrom/CAL/ECT@ECT, Melinda Whalen/CAL/ECT@ECT, Laura E
Scott/CAL/ECT@ECT, Cheryl Dawes/CAL/ECT@ECT, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russell
Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Grant Oh/CAL/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Premstar Energy Canada Ltd. - Financial Transaction Nos. QF3405.1,
QG7130.1, NY2665.1 and NY5271.1

Premstar Energy Canada has requested that the Payment Dates for the above
noted financial transactions be amended to conform with physical settlement
from "The fifth (5th) Business Day following the date on which the Floating
Price is determinable" to "The twenty fifth (25th) day of the month following
each Determination Period.  Should the Payment Date fall on a weekend or
statutory holiday, payment shall be made on the next Business Day.".

My comments are as follows:

1. Russell, kindly confirm that there is no credit concern with extending the
financial payment cycle;

2. Laura/Cheryl, kindly confirm that it is something that we have done in the
past for financial transactions;

3. Melinda, assuming that Russell, Laura/Cheryl do not have concerns, please
prepare an amendment to each of the Confirmation Letters as requested by
Premstar, except that the final sentence of their requested amendment should
read:  "Should the Payment Date fall on a Saturday or statutory holiday other
than a Monday, then payment shall be made on the immediately preceding
Business Day, and if the Payment Date is a Sunday or statutory holiday
falling on a Monday, then payment shall be made on the immediately following
Business Day.".  This will make the Payment Dates consistent with physical
gas settlement.

4. Melinda, if this amendment is not approved by Russell, Laura or Cheryl, I
think that an amendment is nonetheless necessary to the Payment Date, as it
is not the fifth (5th) Business Day following the date on which the Floating
Price is determinable, but rather the fifth (5th) Business Day of the month
following each Determination Period.

5. If possible, Premstar would like the amendment to be effective for the
February, 2001 Determination Period.

6. Premstar would also like this provision to extend to any and all future
Financial Swap transactions done with them.  Mary, is there any amendment
required to the ISDA to effect such a permanent amendment, or is this a
matter that can be dealt with in each subsequent confirmation letter?

Regards,
Peter


As a reminder...there are several pieces of equipment that are set up on the 30th Floor, as well as on our floor, for the Disaster Recovery Team.  PLEASE DO NOT TAKE, BORROW OR USE this equipment.  Should you need to use another computer system, other than yours, or make conference calls please work with your Assistant to help find or set up equipment for you to use.

Thanks for your understanding in this matter.

T.Jae Black
East Power Trading
Assistant to Kevin Presto
off. 713-853-5800
fax 713-646-8272
cell 713-539-4760


I'm at home with a sick child today, but should be in the rest of the week.

Scott Laidlaw@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
12/15/2000 01:17 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: westinghouse 501D5A gtg, with damaged generator - outside
counsel

kay - believe me, i understand.  plz also understand that ben's lastest
guidance to the team (see my last email) was for me, chris booth, and you to
meet with outside counsel to assess/divine the strength of our "case" with
respect to siemens-westinghouse.  again, plz see my last email on guidance
received from ben.  per your note, both chris and i are prepared to meet with
you next week to start/continue the process.  since you have outside counsel
covered, then we are good to go.  your thoughts?  are you available next
week?  plz understand that i am not trying to infringe on your turf.
regards.  scott.

Kay Mann@ENRON
12/15/2000 10:20 AM
To: Scott Laidlaw/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: Re: westinghouse 501D5A gtg, with damaged generator - outside
counsel
Project:
Doc. Nbr.:

Scott,

I'm handling outside counsel, and spoke with him this week.  I'm prepared to
give legal advice on the issue.

Scott Laidlaw@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
12/15/2000 10:00 AM
To: Kay Mann@ENRON
cc: Chris Booth@ENRON, Dan Shultz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ben F
Jacoby@ECT

Subject: westinghouse 501D5A gtg, with damaged generator - outside counsel

plz provide name, address, phone number of outside counsel.  i'd like to set
up a meeting for early next week between scott, chris, kay, and outside
counsel to outline the issues and establish the framework for an expedited
legal opinion on enron's position.  plz advise.  thanx.  scott.


Effective today, we have a group calendar.  Please use it to enter your days
when you will be out.  If you would prefer to tell me, then I can enter them
for you.  Everyone in the West Desk has access to this calendar.  Please
utilize it so there is no shock to us assistants when you are not sitting at
your desk in the morning and are on vacation or a business trip.

Also, please let me know when you are gone for the day.  This does not need
to be in the calendar, but would be nice to know for phone call purposes.

Just click on this link and  the icon will be added  to your desk top.

Many thanks,
Ina Rangel
-

West Desk Calendar =>


I will assume you de' man on this one.

jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com on 03/20/2000 03:04:17 PM
To: "        -         *Scott.Goodell@enron.com" <Scott.Goodell@enron.com>,
Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: New Contract on Transco

AGL just sent me a copy of an existing contract on Transco that has been
converted to a new type of contract. I assume this is one that is released to
us for their Choice program. Who should get the copy and could you please give
me a fax number?

Jeff


This is being to sound a lot like SYBASE.

did we spend all this money and still have the same issues?

can we talk some time about this.

bob
-----Original Message-----
From: Warner, John
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 6:05 PM
To: Hall, Bob M; Superty, Robert; Wynne, Rita; Mcclure, Mark; Jaquet, Tammy; Pinion, Richard; Baxter, Bryce; Reeves, Leslie
Cc: Rao, Ramesh; Pena, Matt; Valor, Tino; Ballmer, Charles; Vinson, Darryl; Ward, Bob
Subject: Unify Status Report

Summary of Bid-Week Performance

On Monday, October 29 we experienced heavy system activity and significant performance problems in the morning.  We were unable to fail-over, but we restarted SQL Server.  Performance improved slightly.
On Tuesday, October 30 we again experienced heavy usage and significant performance problems.  We then re-started the standby server, and failed over.  Overall reliability improved greatly, as the number of user calls related to performance issues dropped.
Since the October 30 failover, we've experienced moderate to heavy system usage with just a few user calls related to performance.  We have not failed over nor restarted SQL Server since October 30.

Operational Improvement Initiatives

It is very clear that current system performance and reliability is not meeting our expectations during heavy usage times.  A Performance Improvement Team has been established to formally review the entire Unify system to identify the top performance offenders.  To date the team has developed a methodology for identifying problematic procedures and tested that methodology to ensure metrics gathering won't impact production performance.  Moving forward, the team will:

Begin metrics gathering from our production systems Monday, Nov 12th.
Analyze results and prioritize performance improvement opportunities beginning Monday, Nov 19th.
Begin analyzing, tuning, and testing our biggest resource-consuming procedures on Monday, Nov 26th.
Deploy changes to production by December 14th.

In parallel with our efforts to optimize existing code, we will also be testing a new firmware version.  Firmware governs processor and memory configuration on our servers.  We believe that with Plateau 8.1 (the latest version of firmware for our database servers), we can realize performance gains.  We will complete testing of Plateau 8.1 by late November/early December, and schedule the migration at that point.
The dreaded "buffer latch" bug seems to have been eradicated as of October 19.  Although we have encountered a second order problem with the fix provided by Microsoft, we are able to work around that problem.
We have implemented new fail-over procedures whereby we restart our database server (the one which was experiencing problems) every time we fail-over.  This does not impact our turnaround times, and will ensure that every time we fail over, we're moving to a freshly-restarted database server.
We have implemented new database maintenance procedures which will reduce the liklihood of experiencing an index corruption, as we experienced on October 19th.

Enhancement/Bug Fix Initiatives

Team Leads have initiated regular meetings to review open work items.  Our plan is to meet bi-weekly to discuss progress, current priorities and new change requests.
We have added an "on hold" status to our SIR database.  Putting an item on hold should be an explicit decision agreed upon by IT and business users.  This new status will help ensure we're on the same page when priorities change and items are put on hold.
Attached is a spreadsheet of our "Top 10" by business area.  This list includes our major open items by priority, and includes bug fixes, enhancements, and some specific operational initiatives as well.


FYI.
---------------------- Forwarded by Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT on 12/13/2000
04:18 PM ---------------------------

"Randall Rich" <rrich@bracepatt.com> on 12/13/2000 04:13:55 PM
To: "Jeffrey Watkiss" <dwatkiss@bracepatt.com>, <jhartso@enron.com>,
<jsteffe@enron.com>, <llawner@enron.com>, <rebecca.w.cantrell@enron.com>,
<Richard.b.sanders@enron.com>, <snovose@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Final Filed Version

The filed version of the comments in the San Diego Gas & Electric matter at
FERC is attached.

 - SANDIEGO.DOC


<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/subst/home/home.html/ref=mk_cust_super_1>
Search Amazon.com for:   Go!

We hope you enjoyed receiving this message. However, if you'd rather not receive future e-mails of this sort from Amazon.com, please visit the Help page Updating Subscriptions and Communication Preferences <http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/browse/-/468552/ref=mk_cust_super_3> and click the Customer Communication Preferences link.

Please note that this e-mail was sent to the following address: lavorato@enron.com

  <http://images.amazon.com/images/G/01/marketing/html-mailings/tracking/open.gif?QJ8BQSC35CRWQL>


Please discontinue distribution of this message to Mike McConnell at his
e-mail address mike.mcconnell@enron.com.  Please contact Cathy Phillips at
713-853-6898 or cathy.phillips@enron.com if you have any questions.  Thank
you.

Cathy Phillips for
Mike McConnell

Tom_Rigamonti@Dell.com on 07/31/2000 10:09:09 AM
To:
cc:
Subject: Dell News Network: July 28, 2000

NewsLine:?July?28, 2000
Re:?GLOBAL NEWS AND  INFORMATION

?
?
IN  THIS ISSUE
?
DELL  NEWS
Dell Goes Direct in  India
Dell Strengthens Lead in U.S.  Market
Moving Up on Fortune Global 500?
Dell PowerEdge  2450 Server Wows 'Em?
Dell?ScoresBig Win in Korea
?
INDUSTRY  NEWS
Intel, AMD to  Announce New Chip Speeds
Succession Plan  for Lou Gerstner?
Compaq Settles  Overcharging Claims
?
?
DELL NEWS
Dell Goes Direct in India:  Dell has established a wholly-owned subsidiary in
India with direct sales  and support operations in major cities, such as
Bangalore, New Delhi and  Calcutta. Currently, Dell is building the necessary
infrastructure and  completing the requirements for implementation of the
direct model in India.  Chip Saunders, president, Asia Pacific/Japan,
announced in New Delhi that the  company is excited about going direct in
India, &the last frontier for the IT  industry.8 According to International
Data Corp. figures in the first quarter,  Dell is the fastest growing among
the top 10 computer vendors in India. For  more of this story, go to
http://biz.yahoo.com/rf/000727/del196595.html.
?
Dell Strengthens Lead in U.S.  Market: Dell has  increased its market share
in U.S. PC sales, strengthening its lead over No. 2  Compaq, according to
International Data Corp. (IDC). Compaq leads worldwide  but Dell has narrowed
the gap at No. 2. Strong demand in Asia boosted  worldwide unit growth to
14.5 percent, said IDC, the market research firm  based in Framingham, Mass.
Read the story online:
http://dallasnews.com/business/116779_pcmarket_bus24.html
?
Moving Up  on Fortune Global 500: The July 21  issue of Fortune magazine
shows Dell has moved up to No. 154 on the  Fortune Global 500, up from No.
210 last year. This prestigious list also is  available online:
http://library.northernlight.com/LH20000713010000412.html?cb=13&sc=0#doc??
?
Dell PowerEdge 2450 Wows 'Em: In its  first competitive product review, the
Dell PowerEdge 2450 claimed two awards  from InternetWeek: the "Best of
Breed" and the "InternetWeek Approved"  awards. The magazine was most
impressed by the feature-packed server and  praised the PowerEdge 2450's
availability features, serviceability and solid  management tools.
http://www.internetwk.com/reviews00/rev071700.htm?
?
Dell?ScoresBig Win in Korea: Korea Telecom, the country,s second-largest
telecommunications company, had to  ensure system-readiness for a
demonstration of an Internet Broadcasting  project to be witnessed on Aug. 5
by the president of Korea.?Korea  Telecom called on Dell,s expertise on
Internet infrastructure. The order  consisted of 23 PowerEdge 8450s, 21
PowerEdge 6450s, 55 Precision Workstation  420s and close to 30 units of
PowerEdge 2450, OptiPlex GX200, Precision 620  and Latitude LS combined.?This
was  just the first order, andevery single  system?was delivered by Dell
within  seven business days.
?
INDUSTRY NEWS
?
Intel,  AMD to Announce New Chip Speeds: Intel is set  to release a 1.13-GHz
Pentium III on Monday, July 31. Longtime chip rival  Advanced Micro Devices
(AMD) is planning its own 1.1-GHz Athlon release on  Aug. 28. Dell is
expected to be one of the first to offer Intel,s new chip to  customers. AMD,
on the other hand, is developing a new version of Athlon  called &Corvette,8
for deluxe notebooks and desktops, and &Camaro,8 for budget  portables. Both
chips are expected to be releasedin the fourth quarter. For details, go  to
http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-2371409.html?tag=st.cn.1.lthd.ne.
?
Succession  Plan for Lou Gerstner?:IBM has named Sam  Palmisano as president
and chief operating officer and John M. Thompson to the  position of vice
chairman, both veteran IBM executives. Palmisano will be  responsible for
IBM's operating units, including all product and services  divisions, sales
and distribution and global financing businesses. Thompson  will be
responsible for IBM's efforts in emerging growth areas such as  Internet
services, wireless technology and Linux. More detailsareavailable at
http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-2336172.html?tag=st.cn.1.lthd.ne.
?
Compaq Settles Overcharging  Claims: Compaq  Computer?Corp. has agreed to
pay  (US) $4.5 million to settle charges that Digital Equipment, a company
it  acquired in 1998, overcharged the U.S. Defense Department for computer
network installation. For more on this story, go to
http://www.planetit.com/techcenters/docs/systems_management/news/PIT20000727S0
050.
?

?

?

 - DNN.jpg
 - bluespace.gif


Cindy,

I had rather in mind targeting the same audiences to which Mr. Mehta spoke,
not a general  press release. I agree that a general message to the world
would
attract attention.

Vince

From: Cindy Derecskey@ENRON on 10/12/2000 03:55 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael B Rosen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Power Play Book

Vince,

You are a saint for lending me a copy of your book.  I agree with you that we
don't want increase there revenues even by a $1.00, although my
recommendation (and Mark Palmer's as well) is that we should pursue a
rebuttal for the following reasons:

As I mentioned I scoured  the internet (Britannica.com, Amazon.com, yahoo.com
and Dow Jones) and could not find one mention of the book, therefore Mr.
Mehta's distribution must not be wide at all.  Consequently, his comments may
not have reached a large audience.  Issuing a rebuttal, may in fact, draw
more attention to the comments and issues then they are currently receiving.
I believe we should proceed with caution, and respond accordingly (with
counter comments) only when comments are solicited from us.  So far, we have
not received any telephone inquiries from media in relation to Mr. Mehta's
Enron bashing.  May be we should 'leave the stones unturned'.

Let me know what you think.  Also, please contact me when it is convenient
for me to borrow the book from you.

Regards,

Cindy

	Vince J Kaminski@ECT
	10/12/2000 03:38 PM

		 To: Cindy Derecskey/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Power Play Book

Cindy,

I got a copy of the book and another one is on the way from our officer in
India.
I can lend you the book and you can makes copies of the most important
chapters.
I don't think we should be buying too many copies and increasing the sales of
the book.

In general, I think that we should counter the presentations made by Mr.
Mehta. The person in charge of
our Dhabol operation is a Stanford graduate and maybe he could obtain an
invitation
to speak at the same forum  and present the facts as they are. He should be
here for the management
conference.

Vince

From: Cindy Derecskey@ENRON on 10/11/2000 01:30 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael B Rosen/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Power Play Book

Good afternoon Vince,

Christie Patrick mentioned to me the conference that your wife recently
attended at Stanford.  At this coference Abahy Mehta discussed his/her
recently published book 'Power Play' - that certainly does NOT flatter
Enron.  I have conducted a search on Amazon.com, Britannica.com and Dow Jones
and I am coming up empty handed.  Would you be kind enough to briefly trouble
your wife to provide any other information she may remember, so I can narrow
my search.

I greatly appreciate it.

Regards,

Cindy


I did get your message and resume.  I am waiting for a return call from a
person in our IT group.  I'll let you know what he says.

DG


I've got everyone's access submitted except Martin Rosell and Anna Reich and
Oliver Harrison whose company codes and cost centers I will need.  Justin,
Mark Illiott, Robert Quick and Paul Simons already had edit access into the
database and does your assistant Nicola Beales who should be checking that
when she approves counterparties for EnronOnline (although I don't think the
UK agreement are currently up-to-date, although they need to be for
EnronOnline, it will save her a lot of time).

I'm a little worried about your Credit people making changes.  When you
approve Credit people, warn them that they are should not make any changes
except to Credit comments.

Edmund will need to go in and add your Legal and Credit people to the
Database Keywords as only he should have access to add Keywords.  You might
want to get him started on that because you have a lot of people to add.
It's taken me quite a bit of time get all these approvals done!


The truth comes out.

 - MORONS1.GIF


Later Tuesday night, Senate workers will unscrew Jeffords' desk from the Republican side of the floor and move it to the Democratic side, outfitted with a new microphone unit.


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 03/30/2000 01:24
PM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
01/31/2000 11:47 AM
To: Susan W Pereira/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kate Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robin Barbe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea
Ring/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jared Kaiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen D McIlvoy/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Scott E Hendrickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah Mulholland/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dick
Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Index worksheets

Hi team.  Guess what day it is??!!

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 01/31/2000 11:46
AM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
12/30/99 12:16 PM
To: Susan W Pereira/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kate Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robin Barbe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea
Ring/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jared Kaiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen D McIlvoy/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Scott E Hendrickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah Mulholland/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Index worksheets

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 12/30/99 12:16
PM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
11/23/99 08:34 PM
To: Susan W Pereira/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kate Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robin Barbe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea
Ring/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jared Kaiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen D McIlvoy/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Scott E Hendrickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah Mulholland/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Index worksheets

Hey team!  I probably won't be here when these are due.  After you finish
working on the sheet, print one copy for Kim Brown.

Thanks :)


The committee had a lengthy conference call today.  Let me touch on key
topics.  First, the application to employ PriceWaterhouse is being
contested by both the debtor and the US trustee.  There was a meeting today
with the debtor to narrow differences.  The debtor will provide a list of
its key concerns and we'll see if we can deal with them.  The UST just
believes that there is too much of a chance of conflict between roles in
the two cases.  We'll be setting a hearing soon to get the issue resolved
on way or the other.  Second, PGE has sought broad discovery from PX not
only of individual participants' claims against PGE but also underlying
trading information.  PX contends that much of this information cannot be
disclosed under the tariffs.  For that reason, PX hasn't even kprovided
this information to its participants.  Eisenberg is opposing the discovery
for that reason as well as based on burden to the debtor.  The PX committee
feels that Montali will accomodate discovery, at least to some extent.
Therefore, in the meet and confer this afternoon, the committee probably
will support disclosure if (1) participants get whatever of their
information as is disclosed to PGE, (2) substantial limitations are imposed
on the parties that will have access to the information and the use to
which it can be put and (3) PGE reimburses PX for a part of the cost.  In
addition, the committee intends to file a motion in the PX case requesting
that the debtor be ordered to turn information over to individual
participants and to our accountants who will have the responsibility to
test numbers but not to make general disclosure of accounts of individual
participants.  Third, Howard Weg believes that without some agreement on
the chargeback issue, FERC will take a long time to rule on whether PX
should return collateral.  Accordingly, Weg wants the participants to come
to an agreement that for any specified period, shortfalls will be shared
prorata among participants.  I asked Weg to send an email out to committee
members describing in detail his proposal and the basis for it so that we
could discuss it in detail during our next call.  Fourth, the commandeering
matters are proceeding.  The committee will complete interviews of
prospective counsel next Monday.  In the meantime, the Victims Compensation
Claims Board should rule June 22.  A summary denial is expected.
Interestingly, only about 30% of the participants submitted claims to the
board.  PX's expert opinion was made available to the committee.  He fixes
the value of commandeered contracts at $1.060 billion minus $350 million of
contract prices for a loss of just under $700 million.  We are following up
to test these numbers.  The committee's counsel has been negotiating a
stipulation for relief from stay in the PGE case.  It's moving too slowly,
so our counsel is drafting a stay relief motion for our review.  No one
seems inclined to start a commandeering suit until relief is granted.
Fifth, our counsel is having second thoughts about a stipulation with
Edison that would address the bond, the force majeur litigation and related
matters.  The question that is under review is whether the proposed deal
could be unwound if SCE files its own cha;pter 11 case.  On force majeur,
Judge Montali apparently rejected PGE's argument on that point.  Sixth,
there is still no deal with the trade creditors' committee.  They want
about double the $4 million we're offering.  We expect any day a motion to
extend plan exclusivity by the debtor.  Seventh, we discussed some
committee representation issues.  The committee voted against adding Puget
Sound as a member.  The committee agreed that it represented those who had
claims based on the scheduling coordinator role performed by PX for ISO.
The committee discussed whether it represented IOU's and concluded that it
did if they were owed in their role as sellers to the PX.  Finally, the
next meeting was set at 10 pst on June 25.  Feel free to call if there are
questions.  Bob Nelson


Applications of Physics in Financial Analysis 2
Liege, Belgium
13 to 15 July 2000

The website for this conference is now available at
www.eps.org/apfa

For further details on all EPS conferences contact: Christine Bastian,
Conferences, European Physical Society, 34 rue Marc Seguin, BP 2136, F-68060
Mulhouse Cedex, France
tel +33 389 32 94 42 fax +33 389 32 94 49
email eps.conf@univ-mulhouse.fr

This conference is a Europhysics Conference.It is organised by the European
Physical Society and its division of statistical and non-linear physics.

 - att1.htm


Schedule cut to 0 for hr 24 on the 24th.  The new Tag number is 10604 , Duke
will re-supply realtime.
Thanks
Mike
If you have any questions call Donald 702-0415


For your information:

Per an IRS stipulation,  the following information must be provided  when
filing a meal expense on expense reports.

 Guest's name
 Guest's title (even if ENRON employee)
 Company name  (if Enron, which entity)
 Business Purpose

Thanks,
Taffy Milligan


Tracy,

I have reconciled the detail file on these and no other ETS company is picking up the costs.  I will be sending a detailed list of the companies to receive restricted stock with the final allocations on Wednesday.

Dawn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Geaccone, Tracy
Sent:	Monday, September 10, 2001 2:01 PM
To:	Derr, Dawn
Cc:	Botello, Mary
Subject:	FW: 2002 Corporate Allocations - Revision #1

These companies have 200-300 people on them each, I hope no other ETS company is picking up their share!  Please let me know.

Thanks
Tracy

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Botello, Mary
Sent:	Monday, September 10, 2001 11:52 AM
To:	Concklin, Elaine
Cc:	Geaccone, Tracy
Subject:	RE: 2002 Corporate Allocations - Revision #1

Elaine,
This is the response we received from Corp. on allocations to 1202 and 1195.

Mary,

Other than possibly benefit items, we won't allocate to those companies individually.  I am getting a copy of the Restricted stock allocations and they may have some charges to these companies.  I suspect that any charges to these two are in the ETS-HQ line but will work with Sharon Aulds to confirm.

Dawn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Geaccone, Tracy
Sent:	Monday, September 10, 2001 10:23 AM
To:	Botello, Mary
Subject:	FW: 2002 Corporate Allocations - Revision #1

Check with Dawn on these companies.  If they don't have employees, the probably won't have Corp Charges.

 -----Original Message-----
From:
Sent:	Monday, September 10, 2001 10:10 AM
To:	Geaccone, Tracy
Subject:	FW: 2002 Corporate Allocations - Revision #1

None of my companies (1202, 42P, 1195, 184) are listed in this spreadsheet.  What do I need to include in my Function?  Are you going to send me a portion of the ETS HQ?  It may make more sense to take those straight to the pipelines rather that flow them through 1202.  Please let me know what you want to do.

Thanks,  Elaine

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Geaccone, Tracy
Sent:	Sunday, September 09, 2001 9:05 AM
To:	Botello, Mary; Keiser, John; Perchal, Cheryl; Maddox, Lori; Concklin, Elaine; Giles, Valerie; Lindholm, Tod A.
Subject:	FW: 2002 Corporate Allocations - Revision #1

fyi

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Derr, Dawn
Sent:	Friday, September 07, 2001 5:28 PM
To:	Geaccone, Tracy; Killen, Faith; Lee, Dana; Massey, Rachel; Smith, Kirk; Wood, Stephen; Copeland, Erin; Selzer, Howard; Pritt, Deborah; Stevens, Kirk; Schwertner, Brian; Galvan, Michael S.; Roper, Kerry; Myers, Thomas; Smith, Jeff E.; Ueckert, Allen W.; Tran, Agatha; Kaster, Mei-Ling
Cc:	West, Terry
Subject:	2002 Corporate Allocations - Revision #1

Attached is the revised Corporate Allocation worksheet.  Corporate cost center budgets will be reviewed with senior management on Tuesday, Sept. 11.  We do not expect significant changes to the allocations, and any additional changes will be communicated to you for inclusion in your business unit's plan.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Dawn
713-853-7775

 << File: Corp_2002_Alloc_2.xls >>


A new Kudlow Commentary has been published on Kudlow.com. As a subscriber, you may click the hyperlink below, login, and view the latest commentary. AOL Users please note, you may need to copy and paste the hyperlink into your web browser.

Thank You,

Kudlow & Company, LLC.

http://www.kudlow.com/members/login.asp?To=Content&ContentID=348


I think we should try an evening meal again.  This is fun ain't it?
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 07/13/2000 07:51
AM ---------------------------
From: Bob M Hall@ENRON on 07/07/2000 04:01 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Anne Bertino/HOU/EES@EES@ECT
Subject: Re: Lunch

We have to move to another day.  Sorry.

How about the 18th.????

thanks

bob

Chris Germany@ECT
06/27/2000 07:45 PM
To: Anne Bertino/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Bob M Hall/FGT/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Lunch

{Cough cough cough, Facial Expression Facial Expression}   SURE!  Ruggles on
me!

Anne Bertino@EES
06/27/2000 04:58 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Bob M Hall/FGT/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Lunch

Chris,

Are you free for lunch at 12:00 on Thursday, July 13th?  Bob and I have
penciled it in on our calendars so let us know.

Thanks,
Anne


FOR 3/9-31:
sale to CES for ROM per S. Goodell volume of 370dth
k64231

thanks
joann


---------------------- Forwarded by Tamara Jae Black/HOU/ECT on 11/28/2000
10:18 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Amanda Huble @ ENRON                           11/28/2000 09:32 AM

To: Melinda Joyce Lynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Helen Marie Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tamara
Jae Black/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chuck Ames/NA/Enron@Enron,
Nate Blackburn/NA/Enron@Enron, Sachin Gandhi/NA/Enron@Enron, Chris
Gaskill/Corp/Enron@Enron, Amanda Huble/NA/Enron@Enron, Massimo
Marolo/NA/Enron@Enron, Tara Piazze/NA/Enron@ENRON, Vladi
Pimenov/NA/Enron@Enron, Elizabeth Shim/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sabina
Rank/NA/Enron@Enron, Mog Heu/NA/Enron@Enron, Colin Tonks/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris
Hyde/Corp/Enron@Enron, Yan Wang/Corp/Enron@Enron, Angela
Hylton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Junellen Pearsall/NA/Enron@Enron, Rebecca
Mata/NA/Enron@ENRON, Marc Bir/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Dronet/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Demetrion Ware/Corp/Enron@Enron, Gloria Solis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Perla
Montemayor/NA/Enron@Enron, Rochelle Dent/NA/Enron@ENRON, Humaira
Badat/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Gas Fundamentals Website Update

Please forward to your groups...

Thank you,
Amanda Huble

---------------------- Forwarded by Amanda Huble/NA/Enron on 11/28/2000 09:11
AM ---------------------------

David Dronet
11/28/2000 08:41 AM
To: Amanda Huble/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Gas Fundamentals Website Update

Morning,

 As some of you may have noticed we have added security to the Gas
Fundamentals Website.
If you encounter this screen when accessing http://gasfundy.corp.enron.com

simply login with your Windows Domain name and password.  This is the same
account you would use to logon to
your PC.  If you do not wish to be prompted with this information again,
check the "Save this password in your password list" option and
you will not encounter this pop up when accessing the website.

Thank you,

David Dronet
xt 53482


I will be out of the office on Tuesday, October 10th. My son Joseph and I
have follow-up appointments on this day.  Thank You.


FYI

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Comnes, Alan
Sent:	Thursday, July 05, 2001 10:47 AM
To:	Alonso, Tom; Alvarez, Ray; Badeer, Robert; Belden, Tim; Calger, Christopher F.; Choi, Paul; Dasovich, Jeff; Driscoll, Michael M.; Fischer, Mark; Foster, Chris H.; Guzman, Mark; Hall, Steve C.; Heizenrader, Tim; Kaufman, Paul; Krebs, Holli; Mainzer, Elliot; Mallory, Chris; Malowney, John; Mara, Susan; Motley, Matt; Perrino, Dave; Platter, Phillip; Richter, Jeff; Rosman, Stewart; Scholtes, Diana; Stokley, Chris; Swain, Steve; Swerzbin, Mike; Symes, Kate; Williams III, Bill; Wolfe, Greg
Subject:	Energy Novice to Be Paid $240,000

Good work if you can find it ....

Wednesday, July 4, 2001
Energy Novice to Be Paid $240,000
 Power: Hefty annual salary goes to consultant with one year's experience in the field. State officials say she is doing a good job.

By JEFFREY L. RABIN, DARYL KELLEY, Times Staff Writers

     The Davis administration is paying a young business consultant with barely a year's experience in the energy industry $240,000 annually to head a team of traders who secure California's daily electricity supply.
     State officials hired Susan T. Lee, 30, in April without competitive bidding under an emergency declaration by Gov. Gray Davis.
     Lee's contract is equal to the $20,000 a month that Davis pays his chief energy advisor, S. David Freeman, a top utility executive for decades.
     The two-year contract will pay Lee up to $480,000 to oversee the state's day-to-day energy purchases, totaling billions of dollars a year.
     Lee's contract reflects the pressure and difficulties the state says it faces to fill key jobs in its new role as one of the nation's largest power buyers, a role that it took on in January as California's utilities faltered.
     Lee's contract was one of about a dozen released Monday, and among the largest.
     Reached at her Sacramento office, Lee would not discuss her contract. She said only that she heads a 15-person team of traders and schedulers that works long hours to keep California's power flowing.
     Pete Garris, a contracts manager for the state Department of Water Resources who recruited Lee, said he met her at industry meetings and had been impressed by her savvy.
     He said he gave her a pay raise to lure her to state service in April after Ron Shimizu, her boss at Mieco Inc., a trading firm in Long Beach, recommended her. Shimizu refused comment Tuesday.
     The state, according to Garris, must compete for employees against an aggressive energy industry and pay good salaries to stay in the game.
     "You can consider this situation to be very extraordinary," Garris said. "Unless we can get permanent and full-time positions approved, these are the rules we have to follow to be able to hire [consultants]."
     Garris insisted that it is unfair to compare Lee's contract with the six-month, $120,000 deal that Freeman--the former boss at several major utilities--struck with the governor.
     "I don't want to compare Susan Lee to David Freeman," Garris said. "David comes from the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power and Susan came from a [private] power marketer. With Susan, we just followed the standard formula."
     In her new job, Lee will direct an immensely complicated, around-the-clock operation responsible for "procuring energy, scheduling power and associated transmission, and reconciling deviations between contracts and deliveries," according to her contract.
     Lee's resume, attached to the contract, shows that she had no experience in the energy field until March 2000, when she joined Mieco. There, she was a trader and power scheduler, not a manager.
     "She was only here for a year or so," said Dina Alvarez, an administrative manager for the company.
     A 1994 graduate of UCLA with a degree in economics, she worked as a pension and benefits manager in Los Angeles and New York before joining Mieco.
     Lee's contract stands out compared to others disclosed this week, not only for its size but for her relative inexperience in the energy field.
     She is being paid $120 an hour and can earn a maximum of $480,000, including expenses, by April 2003.
     Another new consultant, William L. Green, has almost a quarter of a century of experience working for the Bonneville Power Administration, Pacific Gas & Electric and the California Independent System Operator. He is being paid $85 an hour to supervise workers who reconcile the state's accounting of energy purchases. His two-year deal is worth up to $340,000.
     They are not alone in cutting lucrative deals.
     Richard Ferreira, the former assistant general manager at the Sacramento Municipal Utilities District, has a $500,000 contract and is being paid $200 an hour to assist the state in negotiating power purchase contracts. He worked for the Department of Water Resources for 23 years before joining the Sacramento agency in 1987.
     Hardy Energy Consulting also has a $150,000, six-month contract that calls for Randy Harvey to be paid $300 an hour. Harvey has a quarter of a century of energy experience, particularly at the Bonneville Power Administration, where he was chief executive officer from 1991 to 1997.
     Lee's recruiter, Garris, said her lack of experience is not a concern.
     "So far she's done an excellent job," he said. "She has the skills, and she has the ability. She was doing a similar job."
     Dozens of consultants, including Lee, have been hired since January, when Davis declared an energy emergency and set up a special arm of government to buy power.
     The state filled a vacuum when generators refused to sell to PG&E, Southern California Edison and San Diego Gas & Electric because they were no longer considered credit-worthy, said Oscar Hidalgo, spokesman for the Department of Water Resources.
     Hidalgo said that about 60% of the 95 people now working for the division are consultants. The rest are state employees.
     As part of the process, Lee's unit oversees the purchase of power a day ahead of when it is needed. Hidalgo said Lee is involved in contracts that extend no more than three months.
Copyright 2001 Los Angeles Times


o: jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com
cc: dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com, Chris.Germany@enron.com

Subject: Re: Theoretical Storage
ENA will accept your 7/31 balance as shown below.
Scott

jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com on 08/23/2000 01:27:23 PM
To: " - *Kinney, Doug" <BLOCK@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " -
*Scott.Goodell@enron.com" <Scott.Goodell@enron.com>, " -
*Chris.Germany@enron.com" <Chris.Germany@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Theoretical Storage

We need to reach an agreement on the theoretical storage as CES needs to
transfer to NPC a specific volume and price for COH, and AGL ESS, WSS and
Sonat. I had thought we had an understanding that CES would be billed, per
Melissa's memo of 3/15 and conversations during June, the percentages times
the
current month's storage capacity. We may have confused you by sending FOM noms
for storage injections that were different than that formula, and Doug has
noticed the bills from ENA tend to represent the noms.

How should this be resolved? Should we go on ENA billed volumes or by the
formula? Let me know.
My calculations per the formula would give us the following balances for
7/31/00...
COH-4,053,906
AGL-Sonat- 504,379
AGL-ESS-9,827
AGL-WSS-220,209


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/06/2001
02:55 PM ---------------------------

David Ikenberry <daveike@rice.edu> on 02/06/2001 01:39:58 PM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc: ostdiek@rice.edu
Subject:

Hi Vince,

I just now heard back from Andrew Karolyi.  He will be here on Monday March
12.  Would you be available for dinner either on Sunday March 11 or Monday
March 12?
Thanks, Dave

***********************************
Prof. David Ikenberry
Jones Graduate School of Management
Rice University
713-348-5385


Please join Greg Piper and me in Conference Room 4075 on the 4th floor of ECS at 8:00 am on Monday, November 12.  To find this conference room, go through the security badge check point to your right as you arrive on the 4th floor, then make a left at the first hallway and the conference room will be on your right.

Dynegy and Enron will simulcast a merger conference call live via the Internet at 8:00 am Central Time.  We will access this webcast via the two large screens in the conference room.  We can watch this together as a group, and at the conclusion of the simulcast we will have a brief meeting to discuss Q&A regarding the merger and our action steps for the day as the management team of Enron Net Works.

I look forward to seeing you on Monday morning.

--Sally


Hello Tana,

The Global SAP team (Cheryl Johnson) handles any Counterparty Name changes
upon receipt of support documentation from the Counterparty.
Please forward any such documentation to Cheryl Johnson.

Thanks,

Best Rgds.

Samuel x3-9890 (GCP Team)
Enron Net Works _ Global Data Management

From: Tana Jones on 05/08/2001 05:08 PM
To: Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Marilyn Colbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/Enron@EnronXGate, Lisa
Lees/Enron@EnronXGate, Tom Moran/Enron@EnronXGate, Marcus
Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: EOL approvals, 05-02-01 _ GCP Response

Pursuant to the documentation the counterparty provided when they entered
into the power EEI, and at the direction of Marcus Nettelton, a lawyer in the
power group, the counterparty name for the Port of Oakland should set up in
GCP as follows:

The City of Oakland, a municipal corporation acting by and through its Board
of Port Commissioners

GCP, if you could please redo the counterparty name, and Stephanie, if you
could please resubmit the PA to match the counterparty name, then we can get
this one done...

	Samuel Schott
	05/03/2001 09:24 AM

		 To: Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate @ ENRON, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant
Reves/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON, Debbie R Brackett/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON, David
Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON, Cynthia
Clark/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON, Enron Europe Global CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT,
Stephanie Sever/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON, Tom Moran/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON,
Claudia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON, William S
Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON, Lisa Lees/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON, Juana
Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT,
Karen O'Day/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON,
Kelly Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian Lindsay/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications@ENRON, EOL Call Center, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Amy
Heffernan/Enron Communications@Enron Communications@ENRON, Molly LaFuze/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications@ENRON, Danny Clark/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications@ENRON, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron,
Teresa Mandola/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON, Bill Kyle/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON,
Amber Ebow/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: EOL approvals, 05-02-01 _ GCP Response

Any GCP adjustments will be highlighted in blue.

Best Rgds.

Samuel x3-9890 (GCP Team)
Enron Net Works _ Global Data Management

From: Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/02/2001 04:40 PM
To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/ENRON@enronXgate,
Debbie R Brackett/ENRON@enronXgate, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Cynthia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, Enron Europe
Global CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Claudia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, William S
Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa Lees/ENRON@enronXgate, Juana
Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT,
Karen O'Day/ENRON@enronXgate, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Kelly
Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian Lindsay/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, EOL Call Center@ECT, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Amy
Heffernan/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Molly LaFuze/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Danny Clark/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Teresa
Mandola/ENRON@enronXgate, Bill Kyle/ENRON@enronXgate, Amber Ebow/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: EOL approvals, 05-02-01

Please see attached.


request_number:  DS-WA:016
firstname:  Terry Mundorf
lastname:  Mundorf
e-mail:  terrym@millcreeklaw.com
exhibit_wp-02-e-:  JGC-01, 02
page_numbers:
request_text:
request_text:  Please disclose and/or produce any and all communications from
October 16, 2000 to the present, between the BPA representatives listed below
and any representative of any other party concerning BPA's rates to be in
effect for Fiscal Years 2002-2006, the interactions of such rates and
customer contracts, or procedural aspects of these rate proceedings.

 Bob Proctor
 Tim McCoy
 Byrne Lovell
 Byron Keep
 Valerie Lefler
 Jon Wright
 Peter Berger

For purposes of this Request, "disclose and/or produce" has the meanings
described below.  With respect to oral communications, "disclose and/or
produce" means to describe the time, date, approximate duration, and
substantive content of the communication; the identity and organizational
affiliation of the communicating individuals; whether the communication
occurred in person or by telephone; the location of the communication if in
person; the identity of any witnesses to the communications, including all
individuals in the room if the communication occurred by speakerphone; and
whether the communication was made in the presence of or after coordination
with BPA counsel (if so, identify such counsel).  For purposes of this
Request, you need not "disclose and/or produce" oral communications that
occurred during meetings noticed in compliance with Rate Case Rule 1010.7(d).

With respect to written communications, the Request includes communications
in any recorded form, whether on paper, electronic (including, without
limitation, e-mails), or whatever form.  For such communications, "disclose
and/or produce" means to provide copies of all non-identical versions of any
written communications and to describe with particularity the location where
such communications were found and/or stored, including the identity of the
individual with possession or control of the written communications; to
describe with particularity the circumstances under which they were generated
or referred to; and to fully "disclose and/or produce" any oral
communications made in connection with the written communications consistent
with the preceding paragraph.  For purposes of this Request, you need not
produce papers served on all parties to the rate case and made part of the
official file in the rate case.

response_text:
  WPAG objects to this Data Request on the grounds that it (1) seeks
information that is not relevant and (2) seeks information that is unduly
burdensome to produce.  (Rules of Procedure Governing Rate Hearings, Section
1010.8(b).)  WPAG further objects to this Data Request on the grounds that it
is in improper form, as it does not cite to specific testimony or indicate
the specific use to which to information sought will be put,  (Special Rules
of Practice, WP-02-O-01.)and was received after the deadline for submission
of data requests.  Without waiving the foregoing objections, we respond as
follows:

See response and exhibits to DS-WA:015.

The following information is from the web server:
1.  Logon: IUSR_GRANITE
2.  Remote Host:  router.millcreeklaw.com
3.  Remote IP Address:  204.57.181.3
4.  Form URL:
https://secure.bpa.gov/power/secure/psp/ratecase/discovery/wp_02_response.html
5.  Browser Client:  Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows 95)


John,
Another person that should be included in the portfolio services arrangement
is Teresa Bushman (legal)
Scott


Jeff:

To follow up on your call, there is no looming deadline for filing the
updated/revised tariffs for ETI in California.  The changes we redlined are
reflective of service changes and specific PUC telecom staff directives.
(You never know what one staffer or another will require be added depending
on their view).

We also will need an approval on the consumer forms. Any comments solicited
will be incorporated prior to filing.

This should prove to be a fairly smooth process, and next week is fine.
Steve is out of town today and I will want him to approve the changes
anyway.  So, feel free to contact us at your convenience. Thanks

Jeremy Meier
B & C

Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com wrote:

> thanks, jeremy.  my understanding is that it was sent in today.  i'm
> supposed to get a copy.  when i do, i'll forward along to you.
>
>
>                     Jeremy Meier
>                     <jermeier@eart        To:     JDasovic@enron.com
>                     hlink.net>            cc:
>                                           Subject:     ETI CPUC Reports
>                     10/13/2000
>                     02:41 PM
>
>
>
> Jeff:
>
> As a reminder, note that the Quarterly Fee Reporting Statement you
> received and  forwarded to us and Enron Accounting technically needs to
> be submitted to the CPUC/State by October 15, 2000.  If it is indeed all
> Zero's for amounts billed, then you should still fill in zero's and send
> it to Sacramento sometime before Nov. 15, 2000 (penalty would attach as
> of 11/15).
>
> Jeremy
> B & C