Diane and Jeff -- I am going to be on vacation, so please coordinate the
volumes, and California percentages with Sarah Novosel  202-466-9160.  Thanks.

Diane H Cook
12/12/2000 03:10 PM
To: Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: final again

I promise this is the final file:


Hey Em,

Well it's 8:30 Friday night and surprise I'm still at the office.  I love
this place!!!  To answer your question, yes I am definitely suffering
withdrawal.  I will be working very hard over the next few months to cure
that though.  Nothing really exciting to report here except A) Nick called me
my first day back in the office to make sure I arrived home safely ( I really
don't know what to do about all of that)  B) Ben keeps calling me to see if I
want to go out - 2 nights in a row in addition to our Steak Night beer (I
haven't gone either night).  How ironic is all of this?  I've got one guy
worrying and thinking of me that I care nothing for...I've got another guy
who I at one time cared for but no longer do trying to take advantage of my
vulnerable state (which in truth isn't really vulnerable at all) and another
guy, who I until fairly recently cared for, who I think could go the rest of
his life without ever seeing/speaking to me again (Or course I guess the
reverse of that is true as well).

Talk to you soon,
Susan

Positive notes:  I think Ted is getting greying and losing hair with the
added stress of corn trading.  He looks old and pitiful.

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Emily Hillegeist" <ehillegeist@hotmail.com>
10/13/2000 06:59 PM

To: sonderfan@hotmail.com, sscott5@enron.com, lgillet@enron.com,
kaseywalker@mindspring.com, elaina5@hotmail.com, mjmiller23@hotmail.com,
przybyla1@go.com, bodezoffa@hotmail.com
cc:
Subject: bonjour mes amis

oh, the wonders of technology.  here i am, 1000's of kilometers away,
communicating via email with you fabulous folks.  have just stumbled in from
a pub featuring an irish 'jig' band- i picked up the rhythem instantly, i
must admit.....and after only 12 pints!  needless to say, it was a brilliant
cultural experience, and the only thing that would've been better would've
been if all of you could have been there to a., mock and harass me, and b.,
make yourselves as hated as this american made herself....why is that cider
makes you want to sing show tunes and bitch about shitty english  washing
machines....?  anyways- just wanted you to know i was thinking of you- even
if it WAS  after i thought for 15 minutes where the closest burger king was
( *jen- this is as close as you're going to get to those ridiculous
miniature books w/ PMS quotes you're so fond of......how id boulder by the
way...?)  sue- glad you got home okay- going thru withdrawl yet?  matt- got
your emails- twice.  double thanks.  hope my biting response hasn't sent you
into therapy- yet.  kk, llkj,etc- hope all is well in lala land- just fyi- i
think red bull is cheaper here- imagine the possibilities!  and for the reat
of the gang- enjoy yourselves at the infamous cougar 5 yr- i will- OF
COURSE- be there in spirit.....and i'm not being cynical, really......
call/write soon, s'il vous plait......
e
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.


I'm writing on behalf of Jeff Skilling (who, by the way, has really enjoyed
the old pictures being e-mailed back and forth).  He has asked me to find out
what the schedule of events is for the SMU Homecoming October 27-29.  He's
unable to attend any events on the evening of Saturday, October 28, as he
will be at the wedding of a very good friend; however, if there are events
scheduled outside of that time, he would very much like to be there.

Can you provide this information or pass me on to whomever can?  Any
assistance is greatly appreciated.

Regards,
Sherri Sera
Assistant to Jeff Skilling
713.853.5984
713.646.8381 (fax)
sherri.sera@enron.com


Gas Market Winter Outlook:  Fundamental Questions

This conference call is Thursday, October 18, at 10:00 a.m. and is CERA's winter preview show.  I will arrange with CERA for our participation.  You can call into the 800 number below if you are in Houston, Minneapolis or other locations.  For those attending in Omaha, Room 697 is reserved for you.  I will register for all of the ETS staff, just identify yourself as Enron and give your name when calling.

I hope to see you there!

Lorna M. Brennan
Competitive Intelligence
Enron Transportation Services
Omaha  402-398-7573

---------------------

Title: Gas Market Winter Outlook: Fundamental Questions
URL(s):

http://www20.cera.com/eprofile?u=35&m=2745;

***********************************************************************

TOPICS

   *  Demand: Waiting for a Rebound

   *  Supply: Stalling Growth

   *  Storage: Reaching Maximums?

FORMAT

Speakers:

Bob Esser, Senior Director and Consultant
Paul Hoffman, Associate Director, North American Natural Gas
Bryan Sanderson, Associate Director, North American Gas
Jen Snyder, Director, North American Natural Gas
Ed Small, Director, North American Natural Gas

Time: 11:00 AM Eastern, Thursday, October 18, 2001

Eligibility: Clients eligible to participate in this conference call are those
who subscribe to the CERA North American Gas Retainer Advisory Service.

TO ENROLL

To enroll, please send a fax to Katya Ashe at (617) 497-0423, or enroll via
e-mail at kashe@cera.com before 9:00 A.M., Thursday, October 18, 2001. Please
include your name, company, and telephone number with your correspondence.

Enrollment is not mandatory but assists us in optimizing the conference
experience. If you are unable to pre-register, please follow the directions
below to participate on the day of the call.

Follow above URL and click through to the Full Report for instructions to
participate in the call (audio and Internet information).

**end**

E-mail Category: Conference Call Notification
CERA Knowledge Area(s): North American Gas

***********************************************************************
***********************************************************************
CERA's Autumn 2001 Roundtable event dates and agendas
are now available at http://www20.cera.com/event
***********************************************************************

To make changes to your cera.com profile go to:
http://www20.cera.com/client/updateaccount

Forgot your username and password? Go to:
http://www20.cera.com/client/forgot

This electronic message and attachments, if any, contain information
from Cambridge Energy Research Associates, Inc. (CERA) which is
confidential and may be privileged. Unauthorized disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this message or any attachments,
in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited.
Terms of Use: http://www20.cera.com/tos
Questions/Comments: webmaster@cera.com
Copyright 2001. Cambridge Energy Research Associates


Sally,
Let me know how I can help you with this opportunity.
Thanks,

Hector G. McLoughlin, PHR
Human Resources
Enron Net Works
Office: 713-853-6703
Cell: 713-854-0839


Mr. Reeves,

Entex Gas Marketing intends to assign certain interruptible gas
transportation agreements to a new company of theirs which is:

 Entex Gas Resources Corp.  (it is a TX Corp.)
 P.O. Box 200905
 Houston, TX 77216

Would you please run a credit check on this new entity.

Thanks,

Eric Gillaspie
713-345-7667
Enron Building 3886


Sitara deals 257141 and 257144.,

KENNY J
SOIGNET
05/01/2000 11:02 AM

To: Lisa Csikos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Gomes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J
Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary M Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Grant/HOU/ECT@ECT, Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Cassandra Moses/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Cannon Interest May 2000 Purchase

The Storage Book book will purchase 788,354 mmbtu's from Cannon Interest on
May 1, 2000 @ $3.08.
Daren- Please enter Texas purchase from Cannon Interest and a Texas sale to
the Storage Book in the sitara.
George and Aimee-  Please coordinate with Daren so your entries are entered
on the same day.
Mary- The contract agreement, I assume, is already in place.
Lisa, Rita, & Stephanie-  Please be sure the payment of  $2,428,130.32 is
wired to Cannon Interest @ the corrected ABA on May 20th.

If I missed anyone who needs this information, please forward it.

Thanks,

Kenny


Take advantage of the following courses remaining for 2001.

Electric Business Understanding - November 27
The Electric Business Understanding Seminar will give a basic overview of the electric business for those with limited knowledge of this industry. This seminar is recommended for entry level to mid-level employees in either the gas or electric business or in businesses providing services to these industries.

Understanding Swaps - November 8 & 9 and December 13 & 14
This course is appropriate for all employees wishing to obtain a practical understanding of the basic natural gas and power derivative structures that are traded and marketed today. An emphasis is placed on understanding how financial tools are added to physical structures to meet the risk management needs of clients.

Understanding Options - November 27 & 28 and December 18 & 19
This course builds on our Derivatives 1 program and is appropriate for all employees looking to extend their knowledge of basic derivatives. Swaps and options are revisited, but from a more sophisticated perspective. Option pricing concepts are approached pragmatically, both from the trading and structuring/marketing perspectives. The program does not involve complex mathematics.

Structuring Natural Gas Transactions - November 19 & 20
This course builds on the DI - Applied Energy Derivatives program, focusing on deal structuring opportunities particular to the Natural Gas markets.  Participants will develop insights into the economic inter-relationships between the physical operations (pipelines, storage, generation, etc.) and their synthetic financial counterparts (basis, time spread and multi-fuel derivatives).  Emphasis is directed at identifying marketing opportunities that follow from these concepts.  This is not an introduction to natural gas markets.

For enrollment, or more information on these courses, please log on to http://elm.enron.com.


Per Carol St. Clair, at this time, there is no urgency in finalizing and executing any master netting agreements.  No master netting agreement should be signed without Bill Bradford's or Louise Kitchen's prior approval.  If any questions, please contact either Carol or Elizabeth Sager.

Thanks!

Marie


It seems to me that there have been several issues recently involving data
feeds from measurement.  Regardless of the issue, you all seem to express the
same concern:  a lack of accountability, no sense of urgency.....

I brought this up in Brian's staff meeting yesterday, in hopes to get some
ideas on where to go to get some results.  Rita, I understaood from you that
Gary has returned your call and you are setting a meeting for later this
week.  Please include me in the meeting.  If we don't get what we need, it
was recommended that I talk with Ellis Sturn.  If that doesn't work, Brian
will talk with Rod Hayslett.  Rita:  Prior to the meeting, would you please
coordinate the meeting and agenda, consolidating all issues/concerns?  Yvette
can set the meeting.


Please see attachment below with Christi's comments.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jacoby, Ben
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 12:22 PM
To: Mann, Kay
Cc: Krause, Greg; Nicolay, Christi
Subject: Midway Interconnect Agreement

Kay:

Greg has Christi's comments on the FPL Construction & Connection Agreement,
and he will be sending us those comments today in a marked document. Have we
engaged outside counsel to review this agreement? I'd like to have a
commercial / legal review fully completed, and then get accounting / finance
to comment. I this something you were planning to have Carlos to work on
given his recent work on ComEd and Ameren?

Please let me know. Thanks.

Attached is the original generic form of FPL Connection and Construction
Agreement for your reference.

Ben


---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 02/28/2000
08:52 AM ---------------------------

Leslie Hansen
02/25/2000 11:20 AM
To: Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: TVA Response

Kevin:

Attached please find the TVA response letter, as revised pursuant to my
conversations with Elizabeth this morning.  Elizabeth wanted to make sure
that you approve the revisions, particularly the new paragraph on page 3.
Please let me know if you have any questions or comments.

Leslie
*36121


No, Mark Haedicke looked around and couldn't find it.  So I have to call
ISDA...

	Carol St Clair
	02/02/2001 11:23 AM

		 To: Holly Keiser/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: ISDA Opinions

Holly:
Was someone able to obtain the password and pull down these opinions, and if
so, who has them?

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


Mary Hain said she would get the paperwork going on this master agreement.
Either Mary or I will be in touch to let you know when this is in place.

Thanks,
Kate

Rhonda L Denton
03/13/2001 10:49 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Deal 507565

Can you check with Cara and see if this deal should have been put in as a
buy/resale.  We don't have transmission with this entity (WAPA-CRSP).  Let me
know.


Kay, please review and comment.  I'll send to Marvin after you say OK


Hi Shirley, the first 30 minutes or so were spent on going over the ground
rules that Mike sent out in his 1/30/02, 1:37 pm email.  Then we got into BP
2 on Reservation Timing Requirements and went down the bulleted comments
that Mike sent out with his ground rules, starting with the question of
whether all of the BP's under Order 638 should be in the new BP's.  This
discussion lasted about 30 minutes.  Most of the discussion focused on how
to deal with the various timing issues (granularity, submittals, approvals,
etc.).  Finally, it was suggested that a general statement be put in the
Applicability section that if 638 is superceded, a new rule may be needed on
this BP.

One of the suggestions was that you need to know what your products are
before you can determine the timing issues.  We know FERC will be coming out
with a replacement for the pro forma tariff, but Mike doesn't want to wait
to move forward on the BP's until then.  His goal is to focus on the core
elements of trading/tracking/utilization of rights and then add/subtract
once we know what the new tariff will look like.  It was also suggested that
we may want to set aside a conference call session just to deal with timing
issues to make sure all of the BP's are coordinated on that.

He agreed to clean up the inconsistencies related to resales/notice thereof
in the BP language.  I believe it was also agreed that the BP's for
Transmission should be separate from those for ancillary services (due to
fact that some anc services are purchased in bulk for multiple
transactions).

Mike is planning the next conf call for next Wed, noon EST and another call
about a week later.  His hope is to go through as many of the BP's as
possible this way.  Today we just got through BP2.

That's about it, unless someone on ESWG has something else to add.

thanks

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Buckmier, Shirley M.- TMS
> Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 3:01 PM
> To:	Rehman, Barbara - TMS
> Subject:	ESC Conf Call
> Importance:	High
>
> Barbara - since I was tied up asnd not able to get on the conference ESC
> Copnference call today, could you please write up a short detail of what
> took place.  I need this as the ISAS member and also to give to Ann since
> she is attending the next meeting in my place.  Thanks.


The Methanol Plant went down about 5 a.m. today.  It is expected to be down
until late Friday, March 24.


---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 04/12/2001
12:02 PM ---------------------------

"Matt Lenhart" <mlenhart@houston.rr.com> on 04/11/2001 06:00:57 PM
To: <matthew.lenhart@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:

?
 - Rap - Rapping Duke - Da Ha Da Ha.mp3


Ed,

Louise must be very busy. I sent her another message regarding your request.
I shall call her if there is no reply from her within 3 days.

Please, let me know.

Vince

ekrapels <ekrapels@esaibos.com> on 02/04/2000 01:58:59 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: Risk report on "Guide to Electricxity Hedging" and Request fo r
Gu est Access to Enrononline

Dear Vince,

I have not heard from Louise and assume I cannot access Enrononline. As a
result, I have written what I can discern in the attached draft chapter for
the Risk Guide to Electricity Hedging. Could you review the Enrononline
section and let me know if I have any factual errors? Obviously, I welcome
any other comments you might have.

Don't warry about any textual problems -- me editors will catch those.
English is, after all, my thrid language (he said, defensively).

Sorry I couldn't gain access. Enrononline looks interesting and the stock
market seems to be giving you a strong pat on the back. Well done.

Thanks for your help.

Ed Krapels

-----Original Message-----
From: Vince J Kaminski [mailto:vkamins@ect.enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2000 2:44 PM
To: ekrapels
Cc: Vince J Kaminski
Subject: Re: Risk report on "Guide to Electricxity Hedging" and Request
for Gu est Access to Enrononline

Ed,

I sent a message to Louise Kitchen who runs the EnronOnline effort.
She should be getting back to you shortly.

Vince

ekrapels <ekrapels@esaibos.com> on 01/18/2000 12:00:12 PM

To:   Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:  Risk report on "Guide to Electricxity Hedging" and Request for Gu
est
      Access to Enrononline

Dear Vince,

Greetings from Boston, where we're doing all we can to help keep the price
of gas high.

As I may have told you earlier, I'm writing a "Guide to Electricity Hedging"
for Risk Publications similar to the report on Oil. I had planned to write a
significant section on Enrononline, and in the midst of my research on the
topic was denied access by Enron's gatekeeper. Can you help get me in?

As always, the best from here.

Ed Krapels

-----Original Message-----
From: Donna Greif [mailto:dcorrig@ect.enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2000 12:37 PM
To: ekrapels@esaibos.com
Subject: Request for Guest Access

Dear Mr. Krapels:

Thank you for requesting guest access to EnronOnLine.  Unfortunately, we are
unable to give you quest access at this time.
EnronOnLine is exclusively for those companies who can transact wholesale
energy
commodities and related products.

In addition, you had indicated within the comments section of your email
that
you are preparing a "Guide to Electricity Hedging"
for Risk Publications.  I have forwarded your inquiry to our Public
Relations
Department along with your contact information.

Should you not hear back from anyone within a reasonable amount of time,
please
feel free to contact our Call Center at
713 853-HELP (4357).

Sincerely,

Donna Corrigan Greif
EnronOnline Help Desk
713/853-9517

 - att1.htm


Hey Marc - any chance you guys might like to join us on a one week sailing
vacation in the Caribbean early next year (Feb or March)?


Blanca 5-7688

Chair - Louise Beer


Let's discuss further.  I've been in close contact with Chris on this.  I'm
not sure that we necessarily need a "presentation" on the issue.  Speaking
only for California, policy makers and industry participants know a) that
there's a problem and b) that the magnitude of the problem is significant,
and there's not a heckuvalot of leg work that needs to be done on that
front.  I would suggest that we continue to work on analysis internally, and
spend some time discussing further the extent to which we need a presentation
for external consumption.  As everyone's aware, this issue is a very
complicated one and sensitive one for Enron and we need to be very careful
w.r.t. how we approach it.  Thoughts?

Best,
Jeff


This request has been pending approval for  5 days and you are the
alternate.  Please click
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000003997&Page=
Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000003997
Approver            : stinson.gibner@enron.com
Request Create Date : 10/3/00 1:14:27 PM
Requested For       : peter.makkai@enron.com
Resource Name       : \\enehou\houston\common\Research - [Read]
Resource Type       : Directory


---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 04/17/2001 01:57 PM ---------------------------

Mike Grigsby
01/09/2001 02:26 PM
To:	Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject:	New Generation Report, December 1999

---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT on 01/09/2001 03:26 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.  From:  Matt Motley                           01/05/2001 08:30 AM

To:	Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	New Generation Report, December 1999

---------------------- Forwarded by Matt Motley/PDX/ECT on 01/05/2001 06:34 AM ---------------------------

Kristian J Lande

01/02/2001 06:15 PM

To:	Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jake Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank W Vickers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elliot Mainzer/PDX/ECT@ECT, Michael McDonald/SF/ECT@ECT, David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Laird Dyer/SF/ECT@ECT, Jim Buerkle/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jim Gilbert/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeff G Slaughter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ed Clark/PDX/ECT@ECT, Angela Cadena/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jonalan Page/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:	Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Swerzbin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matt Motley/PDX/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Todd Perry/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey Oh/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject:	New Generation Report, December 1999


Hi Tana,
I didn't know if I forwarded this to you or not, but they are indeed marking
up the financial deals
Would you like for me to forward them to you?

Thanks
David
---------------------- Forwarded by David P Dupre/HOU/ECT on 06/15/2000 10:38
AM ---------------------------

	From:  Larry Joe Hunter                           06/02/2000 08:04 AM

To: David P Dupre/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: PPL Electric Utilties Corporation

David,

Make sure Tana knows that they are marking up the Financial Confirms.  The
Physical signoff does us no good.

Joe

David P Dupre
06/01/2000 06:52 PM
To: Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: PPL Electric Utilties Corporation

FYI...I had already been talking to Tana about this.
Since credit was working on it, I didn't provide a reply to you yet.

David
---------------------- Forwarded by David P Dupre/HOU/ECT on 06/01/2000 06:50
PM ---------------------------
From: Tana Jones on 06/01/2000 06:23 PM
To: Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, David P Dupre/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: PPL Electric Utilties Corporation

This is a consent to the physical business, not financial.  Stacy Dickson
will sign off on this as soon as she gets Credit approval, which it appears
she has not yet.
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 06/01/2000 06:21 PM -----

	Susan Flynn
	06/01/2000 05:54 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: PPL Electric Utilties Corporation

 TANA CAN YOU HANDLE THIS?  THANKS!

Susan D. Flynn
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB3806
Houston, Texas  77002
Phone:  713-853-0975
Fax:  713-646-3490
----- Forwarded by Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT on 06/01/2000 05:54 PM -----

	Larry Joe Hunter
	06/01/2000 04:12 PM

		 To: Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: PPL Electric Utilties Corporation

Susan,

Can you let me know if we have a recent Assignment Agreement for the above
referenced Counterparty?  We are recieving Confirmations with the 'Electric
Utilities' crossed out of their name.   Leaving the name as PPL Corporation.
These are EOL deals, therefore we cannot change this to match them unless we
have done some Assignment Agreement that we haven't seen.  Let me know if you
know anything.

Thanks,
Joe


---------------------- Forwarded by Angela Barnett/HOU/ECT on 12/13/2000
02:54 PM ---------------------------

Daily-Blessings <dailyblessings.10@lists.postmastergeneral.com> on 12/13/2000
10:25:01 AM
To: ANGELA.BARNETT@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Daily-Blessings 12/13/00

Daily Blessing
Daily Survival Kit
http://www.daily-blessings.com/bless108.htm

Long, Long Ago
http://www.daily-blessings.com/ch20.htm

FlipAlbum is the world's first software that automatically organizes digital
images into realistic page-flipping picture albums. It has everything you
need to organize your digital photos, make powerful presentations, even email
your pictures. For sheer realism, simplicity and elegance, FlipAlbum is
unmatched. Download free.

Click Here:  http://www.onresponse.com/onR_Ads.asp?a=8534&d=1168

Get 50 Dollars IN COUPONS when you Grab the Gator!  Tired of filling out
forms? Tired of forgetting passwords? You need Gator! Gator is free software
that does the typing for you. Gator eliminates frustrating web chores like
filling out forms and remembering passwords. Best of all, it's polite:  When
you hit a web page with a form or account name & password, Gator surfaces to
provide the exact information with no typing! It takes only 3 minutes to
download at 56K! Gator also comes with  in $50 FREE COUPONS!
Click Here:  http://www.onResponse.com/onr_ads.asp?a=8534&d=13

Listen and reply to your email from any phone for free.
Click Here:  http://www.onresponse.com/onR_Ads.asp?a=8534&d=1285

Just in time for the Holidays, win cash instantly!

Enter The Fastfreefun Hat Scratch Fever Sweepstakes for your chance to win
one of our $100 instant win cash prizes.

All you have to do is scratch off the ticket. If three $100 images match, YOU
WIN!

Click Here:  http://www.onresponse.com/onR_Ads.asp?a=8534&d=1177

Win one of four great trips each of them valued at over $13,000!  Enter today!
Click Here:  http://www.onresponse.com/onR_Ads.asp?a=8534&d=1329

<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>
* To remove yourself from this mailing list, point your browser to:
http://inbound.postmastergeneral.com/remove?dailyblessings:10
* Enter your email address (ANGELA.BARNETT@enron.com) in the field
provided and click "Unsubscribe". The mailing list ID is "dailyblessings:10".

OR...

* Reply to this message with the word "remove" in the subject line.

This message was sent to address ANGELA.BARNETT@enron.com
X-PMG-Recipient: ANGELA.BARNETT@enron.com
<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>


I have sent the contract and release to Pintail's atty. I expect to receive
it back anytime now.

	Steve HPL Schneider
	11/13/2000 08:22 AM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Pintail Production Company, Inc., New Contract Effective
1/1/2000

What is the status of execution of this agreement and when can we expect
closure?

---------------------- Forwarded by Steve HPL Schneider/HOU/ECT on 11/13/2000
08:21 AM ---------------------------
   Robert Walker                11/13/2000 08:05 AM

To: Steve HPL Schneider/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Pintail Production Company, Inc., New Contract Effective
1/1/2000

I sent the final version to Richard two weeks ago.  I missed one week with a
death in the family.  I will check on it today and respond back.

Thanks,

Bob.

	Steve HPL Schneider
	11/12/2000 09:21 PM

		 To: Robert Walker/HOU/ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Pintail Production Company, Inc., New Contract Effective
1/1/2000

What is the status of our sending this out for execution via Sanders?

   Robert Walker                10/20/2000 10:03 AM

To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Steve HPL Schneider/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shawna
Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Pintail Production Company, Inc., New Contract Effective 1/1/2000

Attached is a copy of the Pintail Agreement you asked me to prepare.  The
contract is effective 1/1/2000 for a term of 3 years at a price of 85% Inside
Ferc HSC with a meter fee of $250 per meter.  Please take note of section 7.6
of the agreement.  This section terminates the 70% Letter Agreement effective
1/1/2000 and also states that Pintail is not a party to and has never been a
party to the 1984 Conoco Agreement.

If you have any questions, please let me know.  If there are no changes to
this Agreement, it is in a form that is ready to send to Pintail.  It is my
understanding that you will send this with a release letter to Pintail.

Thanks,

Bob.\


Boyd,

I am not sure you have seen this agreement.  If you haven't, please give it a
look for "fatal flaws", or information you think we need to be informed.

Thank you,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 07/14/2000 05:56
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Gregg Penman                           07/13/2000 11:24 AM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: The Peoples Gas Light Company

Kay - Sounds like Jeff is okay with the affiliate Master Purchase Sale
Agreement from an Enron transactional point of view.  As this document will
be filed with the ICC, I want to make sure that Boyd is agreement.  Assuming
Boyd gives the all clear, we need to decide if we intend to file this right
away or wait for the Hub Agency Agreement to be completed and make a joint
filing.  However, I am cautiously optimistic that we are not too far apart on
the Hub Agreement.  We had a commercial meeting yesterday and despite the
obstacles presented by my supposed MEH partner, Roy, I think we made some
headway.

Talk to you later,

Gregg
---------------------- Forwarded by Gregg Penman/Corp/Enron on 07/13/2000
11:14 AM ---------------------------

Jeffrey T Hodge@ECT
07/13/2000 11:07 AM
Sent by: Jenny Helton@ECT
To: Roy Rodriguez/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Gregg
Penman/Corp/Enron@Enron@ECT, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: The Peoples Gas Light Company

Attached is a memo regarding the above.


Group,

Just wanted to give you an update on the Wheelabrator Martel outage.  They are currently only producing 9mw (they are prescheduled at 13mw), and we are selling them 4mw back real-time in order to cover their preschedule.  I just spoke with Mike Burt at the plant, and he said that they will continue producing 9mw through HE4 on Thursday, 9/27.  Beginning HE5, they will be going down to 0mw, so at that point we need to sell them 13mw, through HE16.  At that point in time they should be back to full power and producing 13mw (their full preschedule).

I'll keep you posted on any changes.
Thanks,

Stan Cocke
Enron North America
121 SW Salmon
Portland, OR  97204
503-464-3829 (w)
503-819-1132 (c)


Start Date: 4/17/01; HourAhead hour: 4;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041704.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 4 / Preferred:  12.00 / Final:  11.98)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/17/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_ERNIE
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL


Sorry, I've been in all day meetings Mon & Tues.  I'll get to it early
tomorrow.


Tana:

The following CPs are not authorized to trade US power products:

El Paso Merchant Energy-Gas, L.P. -- do not change profile -- not a current
CP/not FERC approved
AK Steel Corporation - restricted by credit
City of Huntsville - not current CP/not FERC approved
Holnam Inc. - not current CP/not FERC approved
Unicom Energy Inc. - not current CP/not FERC approved

*****************

Turlock Irrigation District - do not change profile -- open for West power;
not authorized to trade East power

Leslie


According to Kimat, TP2 gets the NYPA sale at Mamou at the prices show
below.  We have 3 options on serving this deal:
1) buy Texas Gas capacity and ship the gas on a secondary basis from the Zone
SL Pool
2) use Transco Zone 3 wellhead
3) buy Trco capacity and ship the gas on a secondary basis from St 65

Most of the time we use option #1.  Texas Gas is cheaper than Trco even after
paying the transport cost.  However, this deal comes to the TP2 book at the
prices listed below.  For April, TP2 purchased the gas from GULF2 at the Zone
SL IF + $.005 and shipped it to Mamou.  The total transport cost  is $.02
(including demand - this changes each month).  We don't arb the supply with
Trco and Texas Gas because NYPA is extremely difficult to work with and this
is a term firm sale to NYPA.

Should we change the mid price for the NYPA to include both the Zone SL mid
price  and the transport expense?

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 03/27/2001 03:21
PM ---------------------------

Kimat Singla
03/08/2001 12:54 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Sale to NYPA

At TGT/ZSL mid i.e.
    Index                      5.01
    Other fee        .01
    Physical Prem          .005
    Total                          5.025

Questions, please call.

Kimat

	From:  Chris Germany                           03/08/2001 08:23 AM

To: Kimat Singla/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Sale to NYPA

What mid price does this deal come to TP2 at?   Deal 655067


http://ectpdx-sunone.ect.enron.com/~ctatham/navsetup/index.htm      PALLEN
WESTGASX

http://ecthou-webcl1.nt.ect.enron.com/research/    ECT RESEARCH PAGE


All

Here is my schedule for the following three weeks.

Please feel free to pick the day and time slot you prefer to meet up with me.
I look forward to hear from you.

Regards
Jan-Erland


We are making some progress with the timeliness of London information.  More
to come...
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 12/27/2000 10:27 AM
---------------------------

Chris Abel
12/18/2000 01:10 PM
To: James New/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shona Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron, Mike
Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT, Michael Benien/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kenneth
Thibodeaux/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: London flash P&L

I appreciate the flash P&L that you are now providing.  That should help
everyone get an early morning picture of what is going on in London.  Have
you had an opportunity to address the need for European VaR numbers at the
same time in the morning?

James New
12/18/2000 01:07 AM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, shona wilson, Chris Abel/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mike Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: London flash P&L

We in London shall be producing a flash P&L from today Monday the 18th of
December. This will be sent to Shona's group at 1pm London time which
Ibelieve is in good time for the P&L consolidation group.

Any queries please let me know.

James


Gang:

The final letter and document will be given to the Speaker shortly.  As you
may know, TURN ultimately decided not to participate.  Also, late last week
the Utility Workers had an elected change of leadership and there was not
enough time to bring the new officers up to speed by our deadline.

The Speaker plans on using our product to simultaneously encourage the PUC
not to close the door on direct access and, if necessary, convince the
Legislature to pass this year a meaningful direct access program (if the PUC
goes south on us).  Also, I believe he hopes that our work will help
convince the Legislature to move to restore SCE to financial stability - and
to do so rapidly.

This last month has been very interesting to me - "oddly satisfying" is how
I described it, even if most of you did object to the phrasing - and I
appreciate the opportunity of working with you.  For whatever reasons, there
is nothing like an intractable social and political problems to get me
interested.  Thanks very much for participating.

Phil


eSource presents Lexis-Nexis training

ADVANCED

This session will cover advanced searching tips.  It will also cover using
Smart Indexing to narrow your search results.  Find out how to customize your
desktop for easier searching.

Attend our Lexis-Nexis Advanced Clinic:

May. 18     8:30 - 10:00 AM    EB572

PUBLIC RECORDS

Lexis-Nexis is the premier provider of public record information.  We will
learn about materials available to you including Secretary of State Filings
and DBA's, UCC filings, Bankruptcies, and Property Records.  If you are doing
due diligence on companies, especially smaller ones, this is a session you
will want
to attend.

Attend our Lexis-Nexis Public Records Clinic:

May. 18    10:30 AM -12:00 NOON      EB572

Seats fill up fast! To reserve a seat, please call Stephanie E. Taylor at
5-7928
Cost $25.00 Per Person
No Shows will be charged $50.00
* Please bring your Lexis-Nexis login ID and password. If you don't have one,
a guest ID will be provided.

Check the eSource training page at http://esource.enron.com/training.doc for
additional training sessions and vendor presentations.

http://esource.enron.com


Just a reminder that our Unify Gas system will be unavailable today from 6:00
P.M. until Saturday at 8:00 P.M. due to  server / database maintenance.


Jim, I am so glad that the 2001 law conference went so well -- we have received many favorable comments from the attendees.  Today we had a post-conference meeting with the group that worked on the conference, and we went over what worked well and what didn't.  It was very productive.

One of the things that came out of our meeting was the need to promptly appoint next year's Chairman of the CLE committee.  Michelle feels that putting that person in place now will greatly aid in the transition from this year to next year's planning.  As a matter of fact, she is meeting with her committee for the last time next week and would love to announce the new chair at that time.

So, could you please think about to whom you would like to give that distinct honor?  I've asked Michelle to e-mail you information about her committee and her suggestions regarding a chair.

Thanks so much for your help and input.


Nymex Moves Gas Opening Bell Up to 9:30 a.m.

The board of directors of the New York Mercantile Exchange has amended plans
to move
up the start-up time for natural gas futures trading because of the overlap
with crude oil markets,
which share an options ring with natural gas. Daily gas futures trading now
will commence at
9:30 a.m. rather than 9:45. The board has scheduled expanded energy trading
hours to begin
with the Sept. 8 trading session.

On July 13, the board voted to expand futures trading hours electronically
for its light sweet crude
oil, heating oil, gasoline, and natural gas futures and options markets. It
also voted to have an
earlier opening for the open outcry session for natural gas futures and
options.

Beginning at 4 p.m. on Sept. 7 the Nymex Access electronic trading sessions
for those commodities
will be extended to run from 4 p.m., Mondays through Thursdays, to 9 a.m. the
following day. On
Sundays, the session will begin at 7 p.m. and will run until 9 a.m. on
Monday. Currently, the sessions
for light sweet crude oil, heating oil and gasoline begin at the same times
but close at 8 a.m. Natural
gas futures and options currently are traded from 4 p.m. to 7 p.m. Mondays
through Thursdays with
no Sunday night session.


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	ETS GISB Weekly Update/XML Discussion Conference room EB47C2/Houston 7C1 in Omaha Terry Lehn attending

Date:		2/12/2001
Time:		2:30 PM - 4:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Detailed Description:


Oops!  Forgot to attach!

---------------------- Forwarded by Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT on 07/14/2000
11:51 AM ---------------------------

Shirley Crenshaw
07/14/2000 11:53 AM
To: Vasant Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Grant
Masson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amitava Dhar/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Maureen
Raymond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Kindall/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin G
Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Osman Sezgen/HOU/EES@EES, Elena Chilkina/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: 7-1-00 to 7-15-00 Off Duty and Overtime Report

Attached is the off duty and overtime that was reported to me for the above
pay period.  You are the only ones in our group that had these reported.

Please review and if there is an error, please let me know by next Monday
the 17th and I can correct it.  Otherwise, we cannot correct it until the
next pay
period.

Thanks!

Shirley


I agree with Jim -- we're less concerned about the mechanism for true-up.  I
think our main concern with the part of the MOU related to URG is who gets
the benefits -- and tying that position into whatever we decide on other
issues.
/TJ

James D Steffes@ENRON
05/07/2001 11:47 AM
To: JBennett <JBennett@GMSSR.com>
cc: "Harry Kingerski (E-mail)" <Harry.Kingerski@enron.com>, "Jeff Dasovich
(E-mail)" <jdasovic@enron.com>, "Jim Steffes (E-mail)"
<James_D_Steffes@enron.com>, "Lelie Lawner (E-mail)"
<Leslie.Lawner@enron.com>, "Robert Neustaedter (E-mail)"
<Robert.Neustaedter@enron.com>, "Scott Stoness (E-mail)"
<sstoness@enron.com>, "Tamara Johnson (E-mail)" <tjohnso8@enron.com>
Subject: Re: Comments on ACR re SCE's MOU

Team --

My initial response is that this is not  a key issue for Enron (given
everything else).  I'd rather simply know how the process is to work going
forward, than make a big case either way.

Jim

JBennett <JBennett@GMSSR.com> on 05/07/2001 11:15:58 AM
To: "Harry Kingerski (E-mail)" <Harry.Kingerski@enron.com>, "Jeff Dasovich
(E-mail)" <jdasovic@enron.com>, "Jim Steffes (E-mail)"
<James_D_Steffes@enron.com>, "Lelie Lawner (E-mail)"
<Leslie.Lawner@enron.com>, "Lelie Lawner (E-mail)" <Leslie.Lawner@enron.com>,
"Robert Neustaedter (E-mail)" <Robert.Neustaedter@enron.com>, "Scott Stoness
(E-mail)" <sstoness@enron.com>, "Tamara Johnson (E-mail)" <tjohnso8@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Comments on ACR re SCE's MOU

About ten days ago, I sent the attached E-mail containing an Assigned
Cmmr.'s Ruling pertaining to the SCE MOU. The  ACR set forth a "model" for
determining revenue requirements for SCE's retained generation. On Friday,
SCE, as directed, filed comments on the Ruling.  Comments from other parties
are due this Friday, the 11th.

Of primary importance is that SCE used its comments to promote the
methodology for recovery of retained generation costs it had set forth in
Advice 1534-E-A (forwarded  to you last week).  This method provides for an
annual rate true-up mechanism and trigger mechanism.  Such mechanisms allow
for rate increases (or decreases) with the filing of an advice letter.

If we are opposed to such trigger / true-up mechanisms  we need to submit
comments on Friday and/or  a protest of the Advice Filing (also due on the
11th).

Jeanne Bennett

> -----Original Message-----
> From: JBennett
> Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 4:25 PM
> To: Harry Kingerski (E-mail); Jeff Dasovich (E-mail); Robert Neustaedter
> (E-mail); Scott Stoness (E-mail); Sue Mara (E-mail); Tamara Johnson
> (E-mail)
> Cc: MDay
> Subject: FW: Com Lynch & ALJ DeUlloa's Ruling mailed 4/27/01
> (A.00-11-038 et a l.)
>
> Attached is an Assigned Cmmr.' ruling issued this afternoon pertaining to
> SCE's Memorandum of Understanding with the Governor.
> The ruling is soliciting comments on the appropriate manner of regulating
> utility retained generation. The Ruling sets forth a specific model and
> asks parties to comment thereon.  Comments are due May 11, 2001.
>
>
>
>
>  <<CPUC01-#96386-v1-A0011038_ET_AL_LYN_JRD_RULING_.doc>>

 - CPUC01-#96386-v1-A0011038_ET_AL_LYN_JRD_RULING_.doc


Attached is the Enron Global Markets Global Products Trading notification
memo for  5 Day Cumulative Loss for June 19, 2001.  The Office of the
Chairman for Enron Global Markets is responsible for printing out a hard copy
of this memo, signing it and returning the hard copy to Chris Abel at 3155a,
who will forward it to RAC to obtain their signature.

Thank You


To help focus our discussion, here is a sample clause (from the McDonald's
contract):

     "Taxes and Fees.  Allocation and Indemnity for Taxes.  Seller shall pay
all Taxes applicable to Energy prior to delivery to each Facility.  Buyer
shall pay all Taxes applicable to Energy at and after delivery . . . ,
including without limitation Taxes imposed on the purchase or sale of Energy,
on Buyer's possession, consumption, use or disposition of Energy, or on any
payment by Buyer to Seller hereunder.  "Taxes" means all taxes (except taxes
based on net income), fees, charges, surcharges or royalties, and any
interest and penalties thereon."

Please also consider the following variations:

     1.  What if clause does not include first sentence so that all "Taxes"
are allocated to Buyer?

     2.  What if the definition of "taxes" is defined as follows:

     "Taxes" means any and all new or existing governmental or
quasi-governmental taxes, assessments, levies, duties, fees, charges and
withholdings of any kind or nature whatsoever and howsoever described,
including . . . generation, . . . regulatory, . . . energy, consumption, . .
. ."

     3.  What if the definition also included "energy resource surcharges"?
(UC/CSU)

     4.  What if the definition also included "energy procurement charges"?

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Williams, Robert C.
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 8:42 AM
To: 'mday@gmssr.com'; Steffes, James; Dasovich, Jeff; 'jklauber@llgm.com'
Cc: Sunde, Marty; Cooley, Jan; Sharp, Vicki
Subject: Surcharges

Jan will be setting up a call today to discuss EES' ability to pass the "3
cent surcharge" through under its contracts.  Marty would like our advice on
this today, so I hope you are available.  Thanks.

P.S.  Vicki and Marty, please let Jan know if you wish to be included in the
call or just want the result.


Are we good to go?

I forgot to show  my husband your pictures.  If it is ok with you, I'll bring
them back on Monday.

Have a great weekend,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 09/29/2000 04:17
PM ---------------------------

Fred Mitro@ECT
09/29/2000 04:11 PM
To: Herman Manis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Rusty Stevens/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Ledford agreement - accounting issue

Herman:

I talked with Karen Way at Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe (our chicago
counsel) regarding the contingencies section (s.18) of the Ledford land
option agreement.  She confirmed for me that none of the conditions in
Section 18 would allow us to recover either the option consideration ($5000)
or the purchase price ($265,000).  Further, the language at the end of
Section 20 specifically states that the option consideration is true option
consideration and is deemed earned by the Optionors upon receipt.

Based upon our discussions this afternoon, I will let Kay know that you are
comfortable with the agreement being executed in its current form.

Thanks,
Fred


Can we discuss? For future purposes only , we need to change our message a
bit on power pools- the problem is not the existence of a pool through which
all transactions clear in real-time( we like and want that),....rather, the
problem in California was exposing consumers and the utilities nakedly to the
volatility of the spot market by effectively  prohibiting hedging  contracts.
This is an important distinction and one we need to be clear on so we don't
trip over our advocacy and the desires of our commercial counterparts.
Thanks.,

Karen Denne
02/14/2001 02:25 PM
To: Vance Meyer/NA/Enron@ENRON, Meredith Philipp/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Peggy
Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES, Eric Thode/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Hedy Govenar <hgovenar@govadv.com>, Mike Day
<MDay@GMSSR.com>, Bev Hansen <bhansen@lhom.com>, jkradin@marathon-com.com,
syamane@marathon-com.com, rlichtenstein@marathon-com.com
cc:

Subject: San Francisco Chronicle Op-Ed

Attached is the op-ed by Ken Lay we've submitted to the San Francisco
Chronicle, at their request.  It will likely run this Sunday, Feb. 18.

kd


Enron is proud to be a Charity Partner Sponsor for the 2001 Shell Houston
Open being held April 16-22 on the Tournament Players Course at The
Woodlands.  The Shell Houston Open ranks No. 2 among PGA TOUR tournaments
with charitable donations of $4.5 million.  While today,s top players are
entertaining you, remember the net proceeds of the tournament will benefit
more than 300 local worthy charities in need of a helping hand.

Attached is a list of available tickets, parking passes and various
invitations, along with a schedule of events.

To order tickets, please follow the procedures listed below:

PROCEDURE FOR REQUESTING SHELL HOUSTON OPEN TICKETS
1)  Send an E-MAIL request to LAURA PENA with the following information:
 a)  Name of Requester
 b)  Title of Requester
 c)  Company
 d)  Department
 e)  Location
 f)   Telephone
 g)  List of items and quantity of each (please notice tickets are limited)
2)  Distribution is on a first-come, first-served basis. THE ONLY TICKETS
LEFT FOR THE SKY BOX ARE FOR WEDNESDAY-NO OTHER SKY BOX TICKETS   ARE
AVAILABLE.
3)  NO PHONE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED

Please keep in mind the sole purpose for these tickets is to entertain our
valued customers. Your cost centers will not be charged for the tickets.

If you have any questions, please contact:
 Laura Pena  (713) 853-5376
 Dorie Hitchcock  (713) 853-6978

http://home.enron.com:84/messaging/shelldescript.doc


Can you let me know what the scoop is on those countries and I will update my
memo.  Thanks!
---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 03/08/2000 08:47 AM
---------------------------

Mark Dilworth
03/08/2000 05:57 AM
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT, David
Forster/HOU/ECT@ECT, Louise Kitchen/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Update to Approved Jurisdictions - Credit Derivatives

Other jurisdictions on EnronOnline are:

AUSTRIA
BELGIUM
CROATIA
CZECH REPUBLIC
DENMARK
POLAND
PORTUGAL
ROMANIA
SINGAPORE
SLOVENIA

should  I assume that these jurisdictions are disallowed for Credit
derivatives trading unless specifically approved?

M

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Tana Jones                           03/07/2000 04:26 PM

To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Forster/LON/ECT@ECT, Frank L
Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Louise Kitchen/LON/ECT@ECT, David Weekes/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark
Dilworth/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Update to Approved Jurisdictions - Credit Derivatives

Per my conversation with Edmund this morning, we are moving Germany to the
approved list for trading credit derivatives.  Below is the list, now updated
to reflect this change.

European jurisdictions which are are approved for trading credit
derivatives:  Finland, Germany, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, and the U.K..

The European jurisdictions which are not approved to trade credit derivatives
include:  France, Gibraltar, Ireland, Italy, Scotland, Spain, and The
Netherlands.   For banks incorporated in a non-approved jurisdiction, it may
be possible for them to trade out of a branch located in an approved
jurisdiction (i.e. U.S. and U.K. branches).   This would have to be
determined on a case by case basis.

Canada is also not an approved jurisdiction for credit derivatives.

Please let me know if there are any changes to this list.


It is time to update the Monthly Report Mark Haedicke send to Jim Derrick.
Please use a hard copy of the attached November report to mark changes for
transactions as of today.

Give your hard copy changes to Dina Snow by the end of the day Wednesday,
December 13.

Thanks!


Maybe have her contact Ted since he is in London??? Rick


---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 05/02/2000
12:36 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Brenda F Herod                           05/02/2000 12:16 PM

To: Lisa Csikos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary M
Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat
Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Yvette G Connevey/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Organizational Changes

Please share with your organizations.
---------------------- Forwarded by Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT on 05/02/2000
12:15 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Brenda F Herod                           05/02/2000 12:15 PM

To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristin Albrecht/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila
Glover/HOU/ECT, D Todd Hall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy Hedstrom/CAL/ECT@ECT, Michael
E Moscoso/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eugenio Perez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Pleus/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen P
Schwarz/HOU/ECT@ECT, James Scribner/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mary
Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Norma Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hector McLoughlin/Corp/Enron@Enron, Susan
Harrison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Patti Thompson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Shoemake/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelly
Templeton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lynn Tippery/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maria
Sandoval/HOU/ECT@ECT, Irena D Hogan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly
Perkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marvia Jefferson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cecilia
Olvera/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Jordan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Chantelle
Villanueva/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Organizational Changes

Last week you all received a memo from Brent Price which described changes
within Gas Operations, excluding Texas.  Attached is an organizational chart
for the Texas region.

We too continue to look for efficiencies to ensure we meet the demands of our
customers.  We currently support the Texas trading region, Bammel Storage
Facility, Houston Pipeline, Powder River Gathering and Bridgeline.  I am
pleased to announce that we will also combine Risk Management, Deal
Validation and Operational Analysis under the management of Steve Venturatos
who will serve as the Business Controller.  Dave Baumbach will fill the Lead
position.  Ami Chokshi will move from Trading Support to the new group,
continuing in the role of the Entex and TUFCO account manager.  Jody Crook
also will join the team.  Bryan Hull will transition his knowledge over the
next month, and will be moving to has second rotation, effective 6/5/00.
Additionally, Will Kelly will transition the Denver trading books to the
Texas team as he moves to the East Region.  Transportation Management under
Mary Smith will NOT be integrated into the team as their day-to-day
responsibilities and projects are not cohesively aligned with this group.
Please join me in welcoming the new team members as well as the team members
who will continue in the group.

Mike Eiben will step in the role previously managed by Steve Venturatos which
includes Global Contracts and Facilities, System Enhancements and Regulatory
Reporting.  In addition, Clem Cernosek and Jennifer Pattison will be assuming
new responsibilities in Logistics and Volume Management, respectively.  Both
Clem and Jennifer have been on the Unify team, focused on POPS.  Please wish
these folks success in their new roles.

All responsibility changes are effective 5/1/00.

Please share this with your staffs.


This is horrible.  In all my years in DC I don't remember any administration
official (let alone a cabinet member) getting trashed this badly except maybe
Ollie North during Iran Contra.  Tino, lets add this to the list of issues we
need to jointly think through.  DF

Lorraine Lindberg
06/21/2000 02:24 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: tmonaldo@mrg-llc.com

Subject: Richardson testimony - (this gets ugly)

Richardson says FBI has determined drives did not leave Los Alamos
June 21, 2000
Web posted at: 3:00 PM EDT (1900 GMT)

By Ian Christopher McCaleb/CNN

WASHINGTON -- Two highly sensitive computer hard drives that were missing
from the Los Alamos National Laboratories earlier this year never left the
premises, and the FBI has uncovered no hints of espionage in the case, Energy
Secretary Bill Richardson told a Senate committee Wednesday.

Energy Secretary Bill Richardson

The two hard drives, each smaller than a deck of playing cards, held vital
nuclear weapons secrets and were stored in a secured vault at the storied New
Mexico nuclear weapons laboratory.

In a statement opening a lengthy and touchy hearing of Senate Armed Services
Committee, Richardson said: "Based upon the investigation by the FBI so far,
there is no evidence of espionage, nor is there evidence the drives have ever
left Los Alamos."

Richardson added that the FBI seems to be on the verge of reconstructing what
happened to the drives, saying, "Latent fingerprints were found on the scene,
and on the external wrappings of the drives themselves."

The FBI continues to comb the "crime scene" -- a room housing a copy machine
-- and a grand jury has been convened, Richardson said, punctuating his
statement with a declaration that a handful of so-called Los Alamos
"X-Division" employees have offered conflicting statements to investigators.

The secretary speculated that the disappearance of the hard drives may have
been an unintentional mistake by a lab employee, who feared coming forward
when alarms were raised.

"I will not take (disciplinary) action until I have all the facts before me,"
he said, vowing, "I will not rest until I know what happened -- when, where,
why and by whom."

The FBI has said the drives disappeared "at the tail-end of March of this
year, March 28," Richardson said. Should the FBI's timeline prove correct,
reports issued at the beginning of this week that the drives have been
missing since January could be called into question.

The two hard drives were discovered missing on May 7, when weapons scientists
took an inventory of the drives stored within a vault at the laboratory's
X-Division as a massive wildfire approached the facility. The section is
perhaps the most sensitive area of the facility, and is where the most
classified nuclear weapons research, design and development is undertaken.

The scientists had been tasked with checking to assure that all of the
division's drives were safely within the vault in the event that the lab
would have to be evacuated. An evacuation was ordered the next day because of
the fire threat, but no one reported the drives missing until May 31,
sparking a massive search of the area -- and deep anger in Washington.

The drives contain vital information on the makeup of U.S., Russian, Chinese
and French nuclear weapons. They mysteriously reappeared last Friday in a
room at the lab that already had been searched several times.

Richardson taken to task early, and often
Richardson's pledge to bring accountability to bear on those responsible for
the missing drives was met with cold stares from committee members of both
parties. Members of the Senate have awaited the secretary's appearance for
several days, after he last week declined an opportunity to offer Senate
testimony, saying he wanted to wait until he had more information.

Sen. Strom Thurmond

The safety of weapons secrets has dogged Richardson for much of his tenure as
Energy Secretary. During his watch, Los Alamos scientist Wen Ho Lee was
removed from his position amid charges of spying. He has been formally
charged with mishandling classified information -- not espionage -- and
awaits trial.

Members of Congress have also raised red flags over the reported sale of
computers once used at the Savannah River nuclear weapons facility in
Augusta, Georgia. Those computers, two senators intimated Wednesday, may have
once contained classified information that could have been reconstructed by
their new owners.

Sen. Strom Thurmond (R-South Carolina) suggested at Wednesday's hearings that
some of the Savannah River computers may have been sold to the People's
Republic of China.

Sen. John Warner

In his opening statement, Armed Services Chairman John Warner (R-Virginia)
lined Richardson himself up for accountability, saying that although
Richardson has worked to change the security culture at the Energy Department
and the national laboratories, ultimately, responsibility for ongoing lapses
rests with him.

"Mr. Secretary," Warner said directly to Richardson, "On June 23rd of last
year you told this committee, in this room: 'The secretary of Energy,' and I
quote you, '...must be accountable and must be responsible" for such security
failures.

" ... We are holding you accountable," Warner said. "These incidents happened
on your watch. Like the captain of a ship, you must bear full
accountability."

Appearing at the hearing, Sen. Richard Shelby (R-Alabama), chairman of the
Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, repeated his earlier calls for
Richardson's resignation, saying, "I think it's time for you to go."

Harsher still was the criticism leveled by Sen. Robert Byrd (D-West
Virginia), a member of Richardson's own party, who said Richardson's pledges
to get to the bottom of the case would not sway the opinion of the Senate,
whose trust he had lost permanently.

Sen. Richard Shelby

"The horse is out of the barn," Byrd said. Referring to Richardson's refusal
to testify last week, Byrd said, "You've waited and shown contempt of
Congress that borders on supreme arrogance."

Speaking directly to Richardson, a one-time congressman and former Ambassador
to the United Nations, Byrd said, "You had a bright and brilliant career, but
you will never again receive the support of the U.S. Senate for any office
you seek. You have squandered your treasure."

Richardson, who at times looked stunned by the tone taken by many committee
members, sought to defend himself -- arguing that he wanted to have "all the
facts" in hand before making a congressional appearance. He added that he had
made vast changes in the security culture at the department and in the
nation's weapons laboratories, and had put off a good many longtime employees
as a consequence.

"I've been excoriated, but if you go into the scientific and academic
community, I am driving scientists away." He also said he has been accused of
racism in the Wen Ho Lee case, and has had to battle members of own party who
saw regular polygraph tests for employees as a violation of civil rights.

Sen. James Inhofe (R-Oklahoma) suggested that the "captain of the ship"
wasn't Richardson, but President Bill Clinton, who Inhofe said was
responsible for a variety of security policy changes and leaks to the media
that have led to a relaxed, careless attitude among those charged with
overseeing the nation's weapons secrets.

'Serious loss of control over classified information'
Also appearing before the panel was Dr. John Browne, director of the Los
Alamos facility.

Dr. John Browne

Browne, while attempting to illustrate for panel members -- with charts --
just how difficult it is to gain access to the X-Division, admitted that his
security operatives have lost control over how classified information is
handled -- mainly because there is no set procedure to determine who handled
much of the material and when.

"This is not an environment one can easily get into," he said.

Still, Browne said, "there is a serious loss of control over classified
information at my laboratory," adding, perhaps for the benefit of committee
members, that he had "no knowledge that the information has been compromised
or tampered with.

"From a national security perspective, these are positive indications."

Richardson was congratulated by Sen. Pete Domenici (R-New Mexico) for ceding
all weapons security issues to a newly confirmed director of a
semi-autonomous agency formed to assess and reformulate all security
procedures.

Sen. Pete Domenici

Air Force Gen. John Gordon, confirmed by the Senate to helm the agency but
not as yet sworn into the post, will report to Richardson, but will not be
directed by anyone else at the Energy Department.

The Senate had held up Gordon's confirmation for months for unspecified
reasons, but he was unanimously confirmed last week after news of the hard
drives' disappearance was released.

"The best thing you could do to leave a legacy for America in terms of
nuclear weapons is to [get this agency operational]," Domenici said, scolding
Richardson not to engage in any "dual-hatting," and let Gordon make the
changes he needs to make.

Warner was less congratulatory, warning Richardson outright that he must
honor the 1999 law creating the agency and allow it to go about its business
unfettered.

The panel closed its session to the public and members of the media just
after noon on Wednesday so specifics of the case could be discussed. Domenici
predicted earlier in the day that a closed session would yield much more in
the way of disturbing information.

"We could go into a closed session, and you wouldn't believe the things you'd
hear in there," he said. "These things have to be corrected too."

When proceedings ended at mid-afternoon, Richardson told reporters he just
wanted "to do his job" and conclude the investigation. He said the fallout
from the security breach was "too political," adding, "I did not utter one
partisan word in that committee."

'Conflicting statements'
Initially, Air Force Gen. Eugene Habiger, the Energy Department's top
security officer, and Los Alamos Lab Director John Browne said in
congressional testimony that a scientist had reported seeing the two devices
in the vault on April 7, a month before they were found missing and seven
weeks before senior lab officials were notified.

Gen. Eugene Habiger

But sources familiar with the investigation told CNN on Tuesday that this
account has come under suspicion because of "conflicting statements" made
during interviews and polygraph tests.

Another individual has told investigators he went into the vault on April 27
and would have noticed if they had been missing then, but does not recall
actually seeing them.

What's clear, said Goss, is that there was inadequate tracking on paper of
the use of the two drives, which belonged to an emergency nuclear response
team. Members of the team, known as NEST, have been the focus of the FBI
criminal investigation. The team is trained to be ready to find and disarm a
nuclear device on short notice.

The disks, or drives, are designed for use in a laptop computer and are part
of an emergency response "kit" available to team members .

All 26 individuals who had unescorted access to the vault have been given
polygraph tests, according to Richardson.

Browne, the lab's director, has testified that security rules for the
tracking of items classified as secret were eased government-wide in 1992 to
reduce the cost of handling the large amount of documents carrying this
designation.

In early 1993 it was extended by then-President Bush to government
contractors such as the University of California, which runs the Los Alamos
lab. The policy was continued by the Clinton administration.

The President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board a year ago cited
inadequate tracking of secret nuclear materials in a stinging rebuke of
security at the Energy Department and its weapons labs.

While the current Los Alamos security break likely did not involve espionage,
"in some ways it's worse," former Sen. Warren Rudman, chairman of the
advisory board, said in an interview. "Espionage is very hard to guard
against. You win some and lose some. Here you've got a situation where there
is just sloppy accountability and record keeping."

The Associated Press contributed to this report.
   RELATED STORIES
Timeline on missing Los Alamos hard drives in question(6-20-00)

Bush on Los Alamos: 'I will bring this sorry chapter to a close' (6-18-00)

Los Alamos lab director: Hard drives may have reappeared to cover
crime(6-17-00)

Missing nuclear secrets found behind Los Alamos copy machine (6-16-00)

Senate hearing examines loss of nuclear secrets at Los Alamos lab (6-14-00)

Secret nuclear information missing from Los Alamos lab (06-12-00)

Conflicting opinions on Los Alamos fire heard on Capitol Hill(06-07-00)

EPA: Data indicates no fire-unleashed radiation at Los Alamos

Fire moves onto Los Alamos nuclear lab property; 14,000 area residents
evacuated

FBI told Taiwan-born physicist he failed polygraph exam that he passed

RELATED SITES
Los Alamos National Laboratory

Department of Energy

House Committee on Commerce: 106th Congress

University of California, Berkeley

Federal Bureau of Investigation

Atomic Energy Act and Related Legislation

Scientific Freedom and National Security

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

MORE STORIES:


Please find attached the current copy of the EnronOnline Weekly Public Report
and Key Messages, including slides and statistics for public consumption.
The information contained in the attachments can be communicated to audiences
outside the company and should be used to ensure that we present a consistent
message to the public. Please ensure that this email is distributed to anyone
in your group who needs to discuss EnronOnline with individuals outside the
company.

This report is not intended to be used as a stand-alone presentation, nor
that all the information be used in a single presentation or customer
communication.

?     Total Life to Date Transactions >1,020,000
?     Average Daily Transactions > 4,700

?      Life to Date Notional Value of Transactions > $610 billion
?      Daily Notional Value Approximately $2.8 billion

?     Number of Products Offered: Approximately 1,600
?     Number of Currencies Traded in = 13

?     EnronOnline Version 1.0 Launch Date: November 29, 1999
?     EnronOnline Version 2.0 Launch Date: September 18, 2000

Special Announcement! This report can now be accessed directly through the
EnronOnline Intranet Site at http://eolinfo.enron.com.

In order to access this report,  click on the link above. Once there, follow
the link entitled "Reports" and then select the "Public Reports" tab. A
dropdown menu will appear with a list of the various public reports available
for viewing. .

We look forward to your feedback and comments. If you have any questions or
experience any difficulties accessing your reports through the Intranet Site,
please feel free to contact either Bryan Deluca at x36161 or Simone La Rose
at x31670.


Sounds good.  Pencil me in.  Of course this won't be as nice as going fishing
to catch those small fish.

	Will Snyder <wsnyder@saylid.com>
	07/05/2000 02:43 PM

		 To: "Scott Sherer (E-mail)" <hsherer@earthlink.net>, "James Esquivel
(E-mail)" <james_esquivel@equityoffice.com>, "Ed Esquivel (E-mail)"
<eesquivel@fulbright.com>, "Ed Snyder (E-mail)" <snydere@wemed.com>, "William
H. Snyder (E-mail)" <wsnyde@mednet.swmed.edu>, "Rich Calacci (E-mail)"
<racalacci@CBS.com>, "Mark Witcher (E-mail)" <Mark_Witcher@tcnetwork.net>,
"Eric Anderson (E-mail)" <eric_anderson@tcnetwork.net>, "Brian Keller
(E-mail)" <bkeller@hicks-thomas.com>, "John Tatum (E-mail)"
<jtatum@genescosports.com>, "Vic Schmerbeck (E-mail)"
<vschmerbeck@firstsw.com>, "Angelo Laros (E-mail)" <aplaros@yahoo.com>, "Fred
Vehon (E-mail)" <fvehon@dillonserv.com>, "Bill Miller (E-mail)"
<bmiller@hfflp.com>, "Jeff Davis (E-mail)" <davje@gardere.com>, "David Zarr
(E-mail)" <dzarr@jwortham.com>, "Paul Cross (E-mail)" <pecross@gte.net>,
"Todd Henderson (E-mail)" <todd.henderson@jer.com>, "Paul Harmon (E-mail)"
<pharmon@henrysmiller.com>, "Greg Miller (E-mail)" <gmiller@flash.net>, "Mike
Schmidt (E-mail)" <schmidt@forevermail.com>, "Michael Cooper (E-mail)"
<mcooper@heritage-title.com>, "Doug Roach (E-mail)"
<jdrdallas@webpc.dellnet.com>, "Jay Thomson (E-mail)" <jthomson@mofo.com>,
"David Pettle (E-mail)" <DPettle@LPCommercial.com>, "Brady Giddens (E-mail)"
<bgidden@7-11.com>, "Paul Kimzey (E-mail)" <paulk@ivgnet.com>, "Carlton Riser
(E-mail)" <Carleton_Riser%HILP@notes.interliant.com>, "Weston Butler
(E-mail)" <weston@venkel.com>, "Lance Jones (E-mail)" <ljones@scomaha.com>,
"John Glidden (E-mail)" <jglidden@pentasafe.com>, "John Schmit (E-mail)"
<jas@rencapital.com>, "Lowell Sands (E-mail)" <lsands@tusaoffice.com>,
"'gerald.nemec@enron.com'" <gerald.nemec@enron.com>, "'jfolk@hmtf.com'"
<jfolk@hmtf.com>, "'lshanks@us.bombayco.com'" <lshanks@us.bombayco.com>,
"'Barker358@aol.com'" <Barker358@aol.com>, "'TrigD@aol.com'" <TrigD@aol.com>,
"'MARCameron@aol.com'" <MARCameron@aol.com>, "'gpeinado@dlj.com'"
<gpeinado@dlj.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Interested in Golf?

We're putting together a golf tournament for Friday morning, August 18 at
Estes Park Golf Club.  I've already talked to the pro and I told him I could
give him a head count within the next few days.  For now, he's got us
penciled in for about 10 tee times beginning at 8:32 a.m.  (I'll be playing
in that first foursome since it's most important that I get to the church
before any of you knuckleheads).  The cost will be $44.00 (green fee and 1/2
cart).  Please let me know as soon as possible, via return email, whether
you want to play.

William S. Snyder
SAYLES, LIDJI & WERBNER

Confidentiality Notice: This email is not encrypted. For information on
secure, encrypted communication with the firm, visit the Secure Area of our
website at http://www.saylid.com.  This email is, however, confidential and
may be privileged; it is for the sole use of the named and intended
recipient.  Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited and
may be illegal.  If you are not the intended recipient, please delete all
copies received and notify Sayles, Lidji & Werbner, A Professional
Corporation.


Why I fired my secretary.....
Two weeks ago was my 45th birthday, and I wasn't feeling too hot that
morning anyway.  I went to breakfast knowing my wife would be pleasant
and say "Happy Birthday," and probably have a present for me. She didn't
even say "Good Morning," let alone any "Happy Birthday." I thought, "Well,
that's wives for you, the children will remember."  The children came in
to  breakfast and didn't say a word. When I started to the office I was
feeling pretty low and despondent.  As I walked into my office, my secretary,
Janet, said, "Good morning, boss. Happy Birthday.! ! "  And I felt a
little better; someone had remembered. I worked until noon.  Then, Janet
knocked on my door and said, "You know, it's such a beautiful day outside and
it's your birthday, let's go to lunch, just you and me." I said, "By
George, that's the greatest thing I've heard all day. Let's go." We went to
lunch. We didn't go where we normally go; we went out to the country to a
little private place.  We had two martinis and enjoyed lunch tremendously.
On the way back to the office, she said, "You know, it's such a beautiful
day. We don't need to go back to the office, do we?" I said, "No, I guess
not."  She said, "Let's go to my apartment." After arriving at her apartment she
said, "Boss, if you don't mind, I think I'll go into the bedroom and slip into
something more comfortable." "Sure," I excitedly replied. She went into
the bedroom and, in about six minutes, she came out carrying a big
birthday cake, followed by my wife, children, and dozens of our friends,all
singing Happy Birthday.
And there I sat...on the couch...naked.


-----Original Message-----
From: Mary Christ
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 8:43 AM
To: Marketing Team; Leslie Haight; Jerry Watson; Tom Conley; Matt
Pitner; Mary Schaeffer; Preetish Nijhawan
Subject: FW: National Poetry Month

hilarious ...

>
> This is a poem made up entirely of actual quotes from
> George W. Bush. The quotes have been arranged only for
> aesthetic purposes, by Washington Post writer Richard
> Thompson. This is especially appropriate as April is
> National Poetry Month...
>
> MAKE THE PIE HIGHER
>
> by George W. Bush
>
> I think we all agree, the past is over.
> This is still a dangerous world.
> It's a world of madmen and uncertainty
> and potential mental losses.
> Rarely is the question asked
> Is our children learning?
> Will the highways of the internet become more few?
> How many hands have I shaked?
> They misunderestimate me.
> I am a pitbull on the pantleg of opportunity.
> I know that the human being and the fish can coexist.
> Families is where our nation finds hope, where our
> wings take dream.
> Put food on your family!
> Knock down the tollbooth!
> Vulcanize Society!
> Make the pie higher! Make the pie higher!
> --
> CYBERAL
>


To:		All Enron Employees

From:	Raymond Bowen, Jr.
		EVP, Finance & Treasurer

Subject:	Update on Employee Expense Reimbursement

Post-Petition Expenses

Effective immediately, the processing of expense reimbursement for business expenses incurred by employees after Enron Corp.'s Chapter 11 filing (after December 2nd) has returned to normal.  Expenses will be reimbursed promptly upon submission.  Employees should conduct business travel in the ordinary course of business as approved by direct supervisors.  New travel and entertainment guidelines regarding business travel and other employee expenses will be forthcoming.  In the meantime, please use discretion as you incur expenses.  All expenditures should be made with consideration given to Enron's current financial situation.

Pre-Petition Expenses

We will immediately begin to reimburse pre-petition expenses for current and former employees (incurred prior to the December 2nd Chapter 11 filing) up to a maximum of $5,000.  We understand that a number of employees have pre-petition expenses in excess of $5,000.  However, under the first day orders of the bankruptcy court, there is a $15,000 allowance per employee for unpaid pre-petition compensation, benefits, and related employee expenses.  This $15,000 cap was imposed without input from Enron management and counsel.  We have sought clarification from the bankruptcy court to assure that this $15,000 cap does NOT include the reimbursement of medical, dental, or vision related expenses.

We have commenced a manual review of every individual with pending pre-petition expenses in excess of $5,000.  Even prior to clarification from the court regarding the medical/dental/vision expense issue, we will begin to reimburse pre-petition expenses in excess of $5,000 and up to $15,000 as soon as we can verify that the aggregate reimbursements to an individual employee have not exceeded the $15,000 cap.  Unfortunately, since this will be a manual process, it will take some time to work through.  Employees with pre-petition business expenses in excess of $5,000 can assist us with this manual review process by providing a brief email summary of their situation, including the total amount of pending pre-petition medical/dental/vision claims, to expensereport@enron.com.

Thank you for your patience.


The files that were given to me have been reassigned within the group.  I resolved Morgan Stanley Cap Group and sent a signed global confirmation acceptance  to Todd D.  As to EES, I was working with Sarah Dietrich, attorney with EES, but could never get them to execute since officers would not do so on the basis of the internal "reorg" issues.  Sarah was going to continue to work on this.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Theriot, Kim S.
Sent:	Wednesday, September 19, 2001 2:41 PM
To:	Taylor, Mark E (Legal); Shackleton, Sara; Cook, Mary; Sayre, Frank; Leite, Francisco Pinto; Hendry, Brent
Subject:	 Pending Legal Review and Comments
Importance:	High

Please see the attached list which details items pending for legal review and comments. The list details the issue by counterparty and the number of unsigned transactions as a result of the issue.  Can you provide me with an update as to where we stand on each item or if there is additional information needed from the confirmation team?  I would like to know which attorney has each particular Counterparty issue.  Thanks for your assistance.

Kim Theriot
x. 31771

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Anderson, Diane
Sent:	Wednesday, September 19, 2001 12:16 PM
To:	Theriot, Kim S.
Subject:	Pending Legal

As we discussed....

 << File: Legal Review 091001.xls >>


Norma:

Here is the "job description" that Vince asked me to provide.

Let me know if you need anything else.

Shirley

---------------------- Forwarded by Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT on 08/07/2000
01:24 PM ---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski
08/07/2000 08:29 AM
To: Sheila Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Norma
Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Anita DuPont Resume

Sheila,

No, we have to go through the posting phase first.
I shall ask Shirley to provide the job description.

Vince

	From:  Sheila Walton                           08/04/2000 02:44 PM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Norma Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Anita DuPont Resume

Vince, Alice has strong qualities for a Sr Admin Asst.  Vince, have we posted
this position on the job posting board?  If so, great.  If not, we need to
post this opening to prove that we have given an opportunity to all existing
Enron employees before we go outside to external candidates.  Otherwise,
existing employees have a valid complaint that we are limiting their
advancement within Enron but hiring externally.   If we have not posted this,
I will have the recruiter contact Shirley so Shirley can give us a job
description.  Then we can post and interview Anita simultaneously.  Please
let me know ASAP if this has been posted.  Thanks.

Sheila Walton

Vince J Kaminski
08/02/2000 08:48 AM
To: Sheila Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Anita DuPont Resume

Sheila,

I would like to hire Anita DuPont as a senior admin assistant, reporting
to Shirley.

Please, call me about it after you review the resume.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 08/02/2000
08:52 AM ---------------------------

Anita DuPont@ENRON
08/02/2000 08:17 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Anita DuPont Resume

Vince:

Here is the resume you requested.  Thanks.   Anita


Mark -

We forwarding the revised GTC's for EPC and ECFC correcting the definition of
Commercial Terms in Appendix I as follows:

We've deleted this definition:

"Commercial Terms" means that part of this Agreement confirming in writing
the specific terms of a Transaction which may be in any form adequate at law
that is issued in connection with a Transaction.

and added the following new definition which mirrors the wording of Section
1.1 of the online GTC:

  "Special Terms and Conditions" means the special terms and conditions of a
particular Transaction for the sale or purchase of Products, including but
not limited to, payment terms, price, quantity/tolerance, Products
description, specifications, delivery location and delivery window shall be
as set forth on this website ("Special Terms and Conditions");
We've also made a global change to the entire document replacing "Commercial
Terms" with "Special Terms and Conditions."

 EPC   ECFC
Thanks.
Nony Flores

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Michael A Robison                           01/18/2000 11:17 AM

To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Nony Flores/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M
Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janice R Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: On-line GTC's for Enron Petrochemicals Company (EPC)

Mark:
The defined term "Commercial Term" which is contained in the Apendix I to the
EPC gtcs should have been modified to reflect the definitional changes made
in Section 1.1 of the gtcs.  I"ll work with Nony to get it corrected.

To: Nony Flores/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janice R
Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael A Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: On-line GTC's for Enron Petrochemicals Company (EPC)

I have gone ahead and forwarded this and the ECFC version to the EOL people
to be uploaded.

I do have a concern though that I wanted to ask you about. These GTC's use
the defined term "Commercial Term" which is defined as follows:

"Commercial Terms" means that part of this Agreement confirming in writing
the specific terms of a Transaction which may be in any form adequate at law
that is issued in connection with a Transaction.

We have taken the position in our other EOL trading that the transaction is
complete and binding from the time we accept the counterparty's offer over
the system by reference to the GTC, the numbers submitted by the counterparty
(usually volume and price) and the Long Description.  We've gone to some
lengths to make sure that the combination of GTC, website numbers and Long
Description contain all of the necessary terms.  It's not clear to me that we
intend the website numbers and Long Description to satisfy the definition of
Commercial Terms.  Are these transactions not intended to be binding until
the confirmation is signed?  Any thoughts on this?

Nony Flores
01/11/2000 06:09 PM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janice R
Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael A Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Steven M Elliott/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: On-line GTC's for Enron Petrochemicals Company (EPC)

Mark -

Last week Dale Neuner was requested to add four new commodities to on-line
trading and Mike Robison and Steve Elliott have reviewed and approved the
long descriptions for benzene, mixed xylene, toluene and methanol.   We have
also finalized the form of GTC's for EPC (who trades benzene, xylene and
toluene) and are forwarding them to you for further distribution.

Note:  GTC's for Enron Clean Fuels Company (who trades methanol) will follow
on Wednesday.

Thanks.
Nony Flores
Ext. 3-7541


Please note the following for april production regarding the Crosstex
Contract: 96048744 at the above referenced location.

Thank you,
Melissa

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Bubert, Jerry
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 2:19 PM
To: Taylor, Vance L.
Cc: Flynn, Shawna; Graves, Melissa; Harris, JoAnne; Reinhardt, Donald P.;
Riley, Brian; Smith, Susan; Sweeney, Christy; Walker, Robert; Weissman, George
Subject: Crosstex Energy, Driscoll Ranch #1, #3, Meter Nos. 9858 and 9868

Per Section 2.2 of the GPA, Crosstex has elected to sell 4000 MMBTU/D in the
aggragate at the Base Contract Price of IF HSC less $0.10, and the excess of
the available gas over 4000 MMBTU/D in the aggragate at GDA HSC less $0.15.


Please keep this number handy just in case.  Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 03/06/2001 02:17 PM
---------------------------

Candace Spencer
03/02/2001 12:26 PM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard C McKeel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Dupuy/CAL/ECT@ECT, Kathy Reeves/CAL/ECT@ECT, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT, Kevin
Heal/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc: Jill Piers/CAL/ECT@ECT
Subject: Peggy Hedstrom

If you need to reach Peggy while she is on vacation you can call her at:

   # (808) 879-6321 Unit 4.

If you have any questions or concerns please don't hesitate to call me.


FUCH - it is great to hear from you.  How did you get my address?  What have
you been up to?

You won't believe it, but I am married(about 4 years) and have a son
Jackson(not named after Bo) that is 15 months old.  We finally sold our old
house and moved into a new one, that is about a mile south of my mom.
Everything is going great for us here.  We are enjoying our new Astros
ballpark, which happens to be named after my company.  Unfortunately, we are
not getting any free tickets(at least the little people aren't).

Where are you living?  Are your parents still in Auburn?  How about your
lovely sister?  I bet she is married with several children.  We go back to
Auburn every football season for about three games, if you are ever in town,
we will have to get together.

Clear Lake is having our ten year reunion this fall.  Should be fun.  I think
you and I are the only two from that school to ever go to Auburn.

Talk to you soon.
PLove


George-

In this afternoon's meeting with Producer Services, Jill mentioned that the
referenced well had been reperfed (meaning they shot more holes in the well
piping allowing more gas to flow out of the well) and was now producing
approximately 800/day.  Per Jill, the MDQ on this well is 3000/day.  You may
want to look at getting this nom revised for the rest of the month.

Mary-  could you get Heidi or Lisa to check the transport rate we currently
show on this?  It's being purchased for SC-.17 and is flowing through King
Ranch.

Thanks.


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Gas & Power Settlements, Deal Clearing, Volume Mgmt PRC  EB49C4

Date:		11/29/2000
Time:		11:30 AM - 2:30 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Today we announced the appointment of Jeff McMahon as Enron's chief financial officer.  In my continued discussions with the financial community yesterday and today, it became clear that this move was required to restore investor confidence.  Jeff has unparalleled qualifications and a deep and thorough understanding of Enron.  He is already on the job and hard at work on the issues before us.  Andy Fastow will be on a leave of absence from the company.

Jeff had been serving as chairman and CEO of Enron Industrial Markets. He joined Enron in 1994 and spent three years in the London office as chief financial officer for Enron's European operations.  Upon returning to the U.S., Jeff was executive vice president of finance and treasurer for Enron Corp.  In 2000, he was named president and chief operating officer of Enron Net Works.

I know all of you are concerned about the continuing decline in our share price.  I am too, and we are working very hard to turn it around.  Appointing Jeff as CFO is one important step in that process.  But most of the solution involves just continuing to do our jobs with excellence.  The fundamentals of our business are strong, and I think the market will begin to see that as we continue to perform.

Please join me in giving Jeff your full support, and thank you for all of your continued hard work.


Miles--sorry about the hurry up.  Please give me a call on this at
402-398-7449.  Note the issue raised by the email from Rick Dietz. Thanks.  DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 01/26/2001
03:54 PM ---------------------------

Drew Fossum
01/26/2001 03:50 PM
To: Rick Dietz/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Julia White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Paul
Cherry/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Jerry Peters/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Maria
Pavlou/Enron@EnronXGate, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lee
Huber/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: P G & E Credit Assurance

Attached is the revised version incorporating Julia and Rick's comments.
Note that to avoid confusion I've labeled the new invoice as the "Prepayment
Invoice" to distinguish it from the "Normal Invoice" we send out later and
which we'll use as the true up mechanism.  I've designated the agreement to
be sent out by fax and FedEx, with two signed originals to be included to
speed execution by PG&E.  I think Rod is the logical candidate to sign it but
have left name and title off for now--whoever signs it please add this.
Please call if there are any questions and please send me a copy of the final
signed version.  DF

Rick Dietz
01/26/2001 02:39 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Martha Benner/ET&S/Enron, Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Julia
White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Paul Cherry/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Jerry
Peters/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron, Steven
Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lee Huber/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: P G & E Credit Assurance

Rod, Paul and I spoke and have only two changes. The second one is a more
significant change to the true up mechanism language in paragraph #4.  Julia
is in agreement with the changes.

Paragraph 2: after "by wire transfer", add "according to the underlying
agreements."

Paragraph 4: We felt this sounded a little complicated and may appear to be a
deposit.  We would recommend changing the paragraph to read:  "Transwestern's
invoice applicable to February, 2001 business, which is to be delivered to
PG&E on or before the 1st of March, 2001, will include a true up of PG&E's
prepayment for February, 2001.  All subsequent invoices will similarly
include a true up of PG&E's prepayment for that production month."

If you have any questions, please give any of us a call.

Rick

Drew Fossum
01/26/2001 01:21 PM
To: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON
cc: Paul Cherry/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Jerry Peters/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Julia
White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rick Dietz/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Maria
Pavlou/Enron@EnronXGate, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lee
Huber/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: P G & E Credit Assurance

I think I beat your deadline for internal distribution, but we need a bit
more time to make sure this approach will work.  In particular, Julia and
Rick need to take a quick look at the true up mechanism and  I need to go
back through it one more time to make sure I haven't forgotten something and
to clean it up.  I look forward to your comments.  DF

Rod Hayslett

01/26/2001 12:57 PM
To: Paul Cherry/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON
cc: Jerry Peters/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: P G & E Credit Assurance

I would agree with Paul, unless Drew thinks we can get the agreement out of
here in the next 30-40 minutes.

	From:  Paul Cherry                           01/26/2001 12:46 PM

To: Jerry Peters/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: P G & E Credit Assurance

 In order to comply with the request we have made to P G  & E of a 12:00
P.M. CST deadline, Chris Chung of P G & E has advised that our proposal has
to be submitted to him by Noon today in order to effect a  wire transfer by
the Monday deadline. Drew is close in the completion of generating the
Agreement, however, with the internal review and approval process, it is
doubtful we can achieve the timetable needed by P G  & E. It would be my
recommendation that we extend the deadline from Monday, January 29 at Noon to
Tuesday, January 30 at Noon. This would permit our internal review with the
expectation of sending P G & E our Agreement by Monday morning and allowing
time for their review. I have spoken to Drew and he is comfortable with this
approach. Additionally, in my conversation with Chung, I indicated that our
approach and proposal would be for P G & E to wire transfer the necessary
funds prior to our providing transportation for February and then payment
would be expected to be made for the January transportation on the
appropriate due date in February. (Approximately the tenth )

 Please advise your comments at your earliest conveniece.

 Thanks and Regards.


John,

I need information on the following questions related to Cornhusker:

1)  I understand that we will be handling the invoicing and settlements of
the supply, transport, and sales contracts.  Who will be handling the
financiol accounting  and reporting for these deals?

2)  Is someone in Legal currently assigning the contracts to ENA?

3)  What is the name of the company purchasing the supply/fuel at the plant?

4)  Tenaska told us that we are supposed to be paying the suppliers and the
pipeline for July and August activity.  Is this true?  I thought we weren't
taking responsibility for this until September business.  We are not prepared
to pay the suppliers for July.

5)  Should these deals be in an accrual or MTM book?

Thanks.

Daren