Here is your copy of the final version sent to the Commission.
Thanks
Gary

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fergus, Gary S.
> Sent: Friday, October 06, 2000 2:57 PM
> To: 'hym@cpuc.ca.gov'
> Cc: 'MBD'
> Subject: Enron Proposals Regarding Document Subpoenas
> Importance: High
>
> Harvey Morris Esq.
> California Public Utilities Commission
> 505 Public Utilities Commission
> San Francisco, California   94102
>
>  Re:   I.00-08-002  Subpoenas Served on Enron Power Marketing, Inc.
> ("EPMI"), Enron Energy Services Operations Inc. and Enron Energy Services
> Inc. (collectively referred to as "EES"), Enron Energy Marketing
> Corporation ("EEMC"), and Portland General Electric Corporation ("Portland
> General")(collectively sometimes referred to as the "Enron Entities")
>
> Harvey,
>
>  Here are our proposals with respect to the Enron Entities'
> production of documents pursuant to the above described subpoenas issued
> by the California Public Utility Commission (hereinafter "the
> Commission").  The Enron Entities are willing to assist the Commission in
> undertaking its investigation into the problems in the California electric
> markets by producing the information specified on a timely basis.  We
> believe that the production we propose will enable the Commission to
> commence its investigation much sooner than if the parties were forced to
> litigate all of the potential objections to the requests for production,
> which are, by any standard, extremely broad and could involve millions of
> pages of documents.  We make these proposals pursuant to our email
> exchange of October 3, 2000 with the understanding that the Commission
> agrees that by cooperating, offering to produce or producing documents,
> the Enron Entities have not waived any objections or challenges to these
> subpoenas whatsoever and that any claims, defenses, objections,
> jurisdictional or otherwise or other responses have been specifically
> reserved and can be raised in the future, if necessary.   For all of these
> proposals, we exclude documents that are protected from disclosure by the
> attorney client and attorney work product privileges.
>
>  Generally speaking, the Enron Entities propose to produce documents
> for year 2000 as noted below.  We also understand that the Commission will
> be obtaining documents from the ISO and PX and we will not attempt here to
> duplicate documents that we understand will be produced by those entities.
> As you will see in the general documents that are offered here for
> production, Enron Energy Services Operations, Inc. is the parent of Enron
> Energy Services, Inc. and does not have operating authority or engage in
> wholesale or retail purchases or sales of energy.  Thus, the documents
> offered here with respect to those two entities originates with Enron
> Energy Services, Inc. but we have designated them both as EES.  We also do
> not propose to offer duplicative documents as between the Enron Entities.
>
> GENERAL DOCUMENTS
> Requests 1 through 4
>
>  Because of the dynamic nature of the Enron Entities' businesses, the
> burden and expense on them to locate, and produce every corporate
> organizational chart anywhere in their organizations since April 1, 1998
> is significant.   The Enron Entities will provide the Commission with
> exemplars of their current organizational charts, telephone directories
> and so called "family trees" to show its current organization.  To the
> extent that the Enron Entities can readily identify and locate exemplars
> of significant organizational charts, telephone directories or so called
> "family trees" for earlier periods they will also make those available.
> One Enron Entity, Portland General, has published books on its corporate
> history.  If a list of those books would be helpful, we can provide it.
> With respect to the other Enron Entities, to the extent that corporate
> histories can be found, they will be produced.  We anticipate producing
> these documents in the first wave on October 13, 2000.
>
> Requests 5 and 6
>
>  The Enron Entities propose that their responses to Requests 1-4 will
> identify their relationship to affiliated companies and the Transaction
> Documents will identify its customers and suppliers.  We believe this
> information will be sufficient to illustrate these relationships for the
> staff's purposes.
>
> FINANCIAL DOCUMENTS
> Requests 7 through 11
>
>  The Enron Entities will produce their public filings for the period
> requested with respect to financial data.  EPMI, EES, and Portland General
> will provide to the Commission electronic transaction data ( the
> "Transaction Documents") for the purchase and sale of energy delivered
> which information includes economic data.   We anticipate producing public
> filings regarding financial data on October 13, 2000 and the electronic
> Transaction Documents in the second wave of document productions.
>
> GENERATING DOCUMENTS
> Requests 12, 14 and 18
>
>  For the Enron Entities other than Portland General, the generation
> facilities are either non-existent or limited in number and there will
> probably be limited documents available.  The Enron Entities to the extent
> they act as a scheduling coordinator or possessed the right to use or
> resell generation output, do not have the specific documents that pertain
> to each generation unit requested.  The Enron Entities, other than
> Portland General, do have documents and information for Las Vegas
> Cogeneration.  We propose to produce these documents in the second wave of
> document productions.
>
>   For Portland General, the production of the requested documents
> would involve a tremendous volume of documents, as Portland General owned
> twenty generating facilities of a variety of types and sizes during 2000.
> Portland General is a net importer of energy and can only generate about
> one half of its total energy demand.  As a result, we question whether the
> effort required of Portland General is warranted as its impact on the
> California wholesale market is necessarily limited.  Nevertheless,
> Portland General proposes to provide for year 2000 electronic Transaction
> Documents in summary form similar to the data being provided by other
> Enron Entities, to the extent relevant as discussed below.  We propose
> that the Commission defer requesting production of other information until
> it has reviewed the information of generators who sell a significant
> proportion of their energy into the California market.  At that time a
> more accurate assessment can be made of whether this enormous effort will
> be valuable given the limited impact of Portland General generation on the
> California wholesale market.
>
> TRANSACTION DOCUMENTS
> Requests 13, 15, 16, 17 and 19
>
>  We understand that the Commission will be obtaining trading data for
> the purchase and sale of energy delivered in California from the ISO and
> PX.  EPMI can provide the Commission several different sets of relevant
> transaction data for year 2000 (in California and outside of California
> and Real Time) for the purchase and sale of energy delivered with the
> date, counterparty, quantity, delivery point, hours, price, and whether it
> is a purchase or a sale.   Because of the speed with which you want this
> information, it is possible that some entries will be incomplete or
> inaccurate.  For those
> transactions where EPMI served only as the scheduling coordinator, we
> understand that the ISO will show part of the transaction, but there will
> not be a corresponding transaction in the EPMI data we can provide
> quickly.  The reason is that this type of transaction is passed through to
> EPMI's customer on an accounting system rather than as part of the trading
> business.  EES can also provide similar data with respect to relevant
> wholesale and retail transactions with the proviso that with respect to
> retail transactions it will not include the specific names of its retail
> customers but instead will provide a blind customer number due to EES'
> confidentiality obligations to those customers.  We anticipate producing
> the Transaction Documents in the second wave of document productions.
>
> FERC DOCUMENTS
>
> Request 20
>
>  The Enron Entities will produce the requests for data they received
> from FERC and to the extent that FERC has been given responses, copies of
> those responses.  We anticipate producing the FERC documents on October
> 13, 2000.
>
>
>  Based upon discussions that we have had with the various Enron
> Entities, we believe that we could make a second wave of productions on
> Friday October 27, 2000.  It is possible that not all Enron Entities could
> make that date but we believe the bulk of the data could be available for
> production by then.
>
>  We propose to make these productions with the understanding that if
> any entity obtains a more stringent protective order than the one
> currently in place, that all of the Enron Entities document productions
> will be protected by the most stringent protective order.  In addition,
> if, at the request of any party or nonparty to this proceeding, the
> Commission or a court of competent jurisdiction orders that the requests
> for production be limited, reduced or eliminated, the Enron Entities
> reserve the right to limit the production of documents in conformance with
> such order.
>
>  We understand that you will consider these proposals and let us know
> if they are acceptable to the Commission.  If you have any questions or
> comments about our proposal, please do not hesitate to contact Michael Day
> or myself.
>
> Brobeck Phleger & Harrison LLP
>
> Gary Fergus
>
>
>
>
>

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com


request_number:  DS-AC:002
firstname:  Thomas
lastname:  DeBoer
e-mail:  tdeboer@painehamblen.com
exhibit_wp-02-e-:  JCG-01 and JCG-02
page_numbers:
request_text:  Please disclose and or produce any and all communcations
from October 16, 2001 to the present, between the BPA
representatives listed below and any representative of any
other party concerning BPA's rates to be in effect for
Fiscal Year 2002-2006, the interactions of such rates and
customer contracts, or procedural aspects of these rate
proceedings.

Bob Proctor
Tim McCoy
Byrne Lovell
Byron Keep
Valerie Lefler
Jon Wright
Peter Berger

For purposes of this Request, "disclose and/or produce" has
the meanings described below.  With respect to oral
communications, "disclose and/or produce" means to describe
the time, date, approximate duraction, and substantive
content of the communicatoin; the identity and
organizational affiliation of the communicating individuals;
whether the communication occurred in person or by
telephone; the location of the communication if in person;
the identity of any witnesses to the communications,
including all individuals in the room if the communication
occurred by speakerphone; and whether the communication
was made in the presence of or after coordination with
BPA counsel(if so, identify such cousnel).  For purposes
of this Request, you need not "disclose and/or produce"
oral communications that occurred during meetings noticed
in compliance with Rate Case Rule 1010.7(d).

With respect to written communications, the Request includes
communications in any recorded form, whether on paper,
electronic (including, without limitation, e-mails), or
whatever form.  For such communications, "disclose and/or
produce" means to provide copies of all non-identical
versions of any written communications and to describe
with particularity the circumstances under  which they were
generated or referred to; and to fully "disclose and/or
produce" any oral communications made in connection with
the written communications consistent with the preceding
paragraph. For purposes of this Request, you need not
produce papers served on all parties to the rate case and
made part of the official file in the rate case.
response_text:  There have been no communications from October 16, 2001
forward.  We have received your amendment to this data
request via e-mail but have not yet received a hard copy.
Once we receive the hard copy, we will respond within
seven (7) days, as set forth in WP-02-O-05.

The following information is from the web server:
1.  Logon: IUSR_GRANITE
2.  Remote Host:  border.paine-hamblen.com
3.  Remote IP Address:  207.53.155.98
4.  Form URL:
https://secure.bpa.gov/power/secure/psp/ratecase/discovery/wp_02_response.html
5.  Browser Client:  Mozilla/4.7 [en] (Win98; I)


Michael,

I think that Keynes was right on the money.
He had great insights into the forward markets.

By  the way, what are your thoughts about CA?

Vince

From: Michael SCHILMOELLER/ENRON@enronxgate on 01/04/2001 02:33 PM
To: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Henwood Stuff and Thoughts about Valuation

Did you guys get this?

I was too interested in the conversation to interrupt with comments about
risk/return & valuation of assets for utilities.  I thought I would mention to
you, however, that when decisions are quantified, utilities usually use
classical decision analysis, i.e., von Neuman utility curves.  If the decision
is for unregulated assets or impacts shareholders directly, it is the
President's curve; if the decision would be covered in rates, it is the
customers' curves or equivalently the PUC's curve.

I think if I were going to approach valuation in commodities where the
assumptions of Black/Scholes do not apply, I would start with the CAPM for
large industries in an area, use pro formas to translate this to utility
curves for the input commodities, and add the utility curves.

Another issue:  The factor that explains why Enron is lowest bidder is its
role in the market.  In the 1930s, Keynes argued that if most market
participants with long position were hedgers, futures prices would be higher
than spot; if they were speculators or traders, future prices would be lower
than spot.  Traders must be compensated for holding the risk; hedgers
(including utilities and consumers) are willing to pay a premium for the
certainty.  Consequently, Enron traders have bigger bid/ask spreads and lower
bid prices.

Just some random thoughts,
Michael

-----Original Message-----
Date:  01/04/2001  10:41 am  (Thursday)
From:  "Heather Mason" <hmason@hesinet.com>
To:  HQ3.EM5(Michael Schilmoeller)

Mark Your Calendar-Tuesday January 23, 2001 Downtown Houston Hyatt Hotel

Henwood will be hosting a comprehensive ERCOT Symposium on Tuesday,  January
23, 2001. A team of Henwood regional power market specialists will be
presenting the latest analysis and
information to assist you in preparing for the new ERCOT Restructured Power
Market, in addition to an anlysis of the issues now playing out in the WSCC
markets.   Coffee and registration will
begin at 9:30 AM  and the program will run until 3:00 PM.  Lunch and snacks
will be provided.

Agenda topics include:

* What will be the critical-success factors for qualified scheduling entities
operating in ERCOT's new wholesale & retail markets?
* How will market restructuring impact mid to long-term wholesale prices?
* What is the outlook for new generation?
* What are the impacts of upcoming emission regulations on ERCOT's generation
resources?
* What are the new analytical tools available to capture market uncertainty
impacts to your supply contracts and generation assets?
* What are the restructuring lessons learned from the California experience
and the implications to ERCOT?

In conjunction with this Program, Henwood will have a demonstration room
available to present its latest software applications and e-business
solutions. A nominal $75 registration fee is required
to reserve a space in the workshop.

For more information or to reserve your spot, please contact Heather Mason at
Henwood: hmason@hesinet.com or 916/569-0985.

About Henwood: Henwood offers integrated business solutions, strategic
consulting, and innovative e-Business applications to meet the challenges of
the restructured energy markets throughout
North America, Australia, and Europe, serving clients that include eight of
the ten top utilities in North America, in addition to energy services
providers and power marketers.


BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS

Enron Industrial Markets
Metal Bulletin - Iron and Steel Awards for 2000
Pushiest Entrant: Enron, the US commodity trading company, which promised it
would revolutionize the steel business by offering futures in hot rolled coil
via its online market place.

The EIM Fundamentals Analysis group is excited to announce that Dave Allan
has joined as a Director, responsible for all Forest Products lines.  He
comes to EIM with 20 years of experience in the Forest Products industry, of
which 14 were spent at Abitibi and 6 with Pulp and Paper Week.  Please join
us in welcoming Dave.

The Siebel Team (&The Force8) continues to work towards program
implementation of its customer management system in early May, with training
to begin at the end of April.  Stay tuned for updates.

Enron Global LNG
Enron Global LNG is positioning itself to be a creator and leader of a global
wholesale LNG market.  The rising prices of natural gas in the United States
and concerns over future energy supplies have created a bullish outlook for
LNG in the U.S. and around the globe.   LNG has played a major role in
serving energy needs in many parts of the world, but its place in the U.S.
energy picture has been limited. An LNG market that spans the globe can
supply vast amounts of otherwise stranded gas to the world,s growing appetite
for cleaner burning fuels.   Enron Global LNG sees great opportunity for
Enron,s wholesale energy business model to help shape yet another energy
market.

IN THE NEWS

Enron Corp. Says First-Quarter Profit Rose 20 Percent
Houston, April 17 (Bloomberg) -- Enron Corp., the largest energy trader, said
first-quarter profit rose 20 percent as sales almost quadrupled. Profit from
operations rose to $406 million, or 47 cents, from $338 million, or 40 cents,
in the year-earlier period.  Enron raised its 2001 profit forecast to $1.75
to $1.80 a share, from its January projection of $1.70 to $1.75.

First-quarter revenue surged to $50.1 billion from $13.1 billion as Enron
boosted the volume of power sold in North America by 90 percent. Enron had a
first-quarter gain of $19 million, or 2 cents a share, for an accounting
change, making net income $425 million, or 49 cents a share. There were no
charges or gains in the year-earlier period.

WELCOME
New Hires
EGM - Janelle Russell,
EIM   - David Allan, Sylvia Carter
ENA  - Sasha Divelbiss, Amy Quirsfeld, Judy Zhang, Annette Thompson, Kelly
Donlevy-Lee, Grant Patterson

Transfers (to or within)
ENA ) William Abler, Magdalena Cruz, Barbara Taylor, James Reyes, Marvin
Carter, Angel Tamariz, Jesse Bryson
EIM ) Cassandra Dutton, Christine Sullivan, Camille Gerard, Sherri Kathol,
Jennifer Watson
EGM ) Steven Batchelder

LEGAL STUFF
The information contained in this newsletter is confidential and proprietary
to Enron Corp. and its subsidiaries.  It is intended for internal use only
and should not be disclosed.


Legal has signed off on the counterparty, so I expect it is being held up
with the online team for some reason.

	Mary Griff Gray
	08/07/2000 08:44 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Western Area Power Admin -- Upper Great Plains

Tana/Claudia --

Could you bring me up-to-date on the progress of this app?

Thanks,
Griff
x35753

From:  Mary Griff Gray
     07/31/2000 09:55 AM

To: Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Western Area Power Admin -- Upper Great Plains

Claudia --   I see that this app is still in Legal (since 7/14).  Could you
give me an ETA on it?

Thanks,
Griff
35753


I have stranded all the transport to the border out of Keystone for the month of December.

The transport volumes that have been taken out are as follows:

	22,836 - Keystone  -->  Socal Ehrenburg

	11,418 - Keystone  -->  Socal Ehrenburg (this is the mexican de cobra deal).  Previously Mexican de Cobra was buying the gas from Texaco.  Starting in 					December, Mexican will have to find another supply for this gas.  They will no longer buy from Texaco.  Phil Polsky is talking with 					Mexican, and a deal will be entered into Sitara, once Mexican has found a supply.  So as of now, the 11,828 supply coming into Keystone 				for this deal is not in the system.

	3975 - Keystone  -->  Socal Topock


I just added a Koch demand charge on the sheet but it is 100% reimbursed.


Open the "utility" spreadsheet and try to complete the analysis of whether it
is better to be a small commercial or a medium commercial (LP-1).
You will need to get the usage for that meter for the last 12 months.  If we
have one year of data, we can tell which will be cheaper.  Use the rates
described in the spreadsheet.  This is a great chance for you to practice
excel.


I understand what you are looking for, and Bob Hall and I look forward to sitting down with you to review operations costs for Enron Americas.  I do think it will be meaningful to you to look at the components of the aggregate number to understand all of the functions that are provided and the drivers behind the cost structure for each function.  They are different.  Some costs are impacted by number of transactions, some are not.  For instance, all operating companies are allocated a portion of the cost of producing the DPR each day and posting results on the Executive Reports Viewer.  Regardless of the number of transactions, there is a fixed cost for aggregating that information.   That fixed cost estimated for the year likely will not change.  What may change is the allocation methodology used -- i.e. if EEL adds four new product lines to be aggregated on the DPR and if it is a very manually intensive task to get that information daily, then we may adjust the allocations such that EEL's percentage of the total cost of producing the DPR will be appropriately increased.

For the past two years, we have created the operations budget for Enron Americas with a defined set of services as the underlying assumption in the budgets.  There have been times when we have had to add personnel to handle new businesses that have been created that were unknown during the budget process (ex:wellhead desk) or deals that are done that are very operationally intensive (ex: asset management deals).  When this happens, we calculate the fully-loaded cost of the person or persons required to support that new activity and have the commercial person responsible for that business sign off on the additional expense to be incurred that was not in the original operations budget - a change order to the original budget.

I know that Wes is coordinating the budget review meetings for Enron Americas, so I will work with him to make that happen.  In addition, Greg Piper and I are trying to get a time that works for you and John Lavorato early next week so that we can discuss the mechanics of a service level agreement.  --Sally

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Thursday, September  6, 2001 2:01 PM
To:	Beck, Sally
Subject:	thanks for your voicemail - just to clarify though

I am not looking for an aggregate number - I am looking for a number per transaction which we can contract at between EA and ENW.

Thanks


can you please get this right.
PL


Kay,  Please review the attached and let me know if there are any issues.
Thanks.


Clayton,

Great news. I would like to sit down with you, Tom and Stinson and review
where
we are with  this project. Also, I would like to talk to you about your
status (finalizing
the transfer to another group).

Vince

	Clayton Vernon @ ENRON
	01/18/2001 03:21 PM

To: Vasant Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EOL

Vasant-

Dave Delaney called an hour ago. He needed a statistic from EOL that the EOL
folks couldn't give him (it seems they had a database problem in 1999), and
the grapevine had it we had the data. Tom Barkley was able to give him the
data he needed for his presentation, within a matter of 10 minutes or so.

Clayton


Nora J. Dobin
Senior Counsel
Enron Global Finance
Enron Corp.
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas  77002

713/345-7723 (phone)
713/853-9252 (fax)
E-mail:  nora.dobin@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Nora Dobin/Corp/Enron on 11/15/2000 01:46 PM -----

	Melba Trevino
	11/15/2000 01:34 PM

		 To: Nora Dobin/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: DEALBENCH, LLC

----- Forwarded by Melba Trevino/NA/Enron on 11/15/2000 01:34 PM -----

	"Baird, Bob" <RBaird@velaw.com>
	Sent by: "Matthews, Rebecca" <rmatthews@velaw.com>
	11/15/2000 10:35 AM

		 To: "'melba.trevino@enron.com'" <melba.trevino@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: DEALBENCH, LLC

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:  Baird, Bob
> Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 11:36 AM
> To: Dobin, Nora (Enron)
> Cc: Harvey, Dean
> Subject: DEALBENCH, LLC
>
>  <<162631_1.DOC>>
> Nora: I took your outline and put my current thinking in italics.
          ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.  This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system.  Thank You

 - 162631_1.DOC


You have received this email because you are listed as a security approver.
Please click
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000009331&Page=
Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000009331
Request Create Date : 12/6/00 9:14:44 AM
Requested For       : rachel.cady@enron.com
Resource Name       : EOL US Other
Resource Type       : Applications


Jana,

It was a pleasure meeting  you and John last Saturday.
Let's meet again soon. Maybe this film about the suburbs when it
arrives in Houston.

Vince

Jlpnymex@aol.com on 04/19/2000 08:25:31 AM
To: Doris.A.Abernathy@ucm.com, rbaker@reliantenergy.com,
blackj@wellsfargo.com, Louisb2468@aol.com, burgher@cornerstonesolutions.com,
KathiDisch@aol.com, KCDunnagan@aol.com, rdyerlaw@houston.rr.com,
fisherconsultants@msn.com, sgoldfield@tmh.tmc.edu, RKSFLA@aol.com,
ggulen@uh.edu, elizabethherring@pzlqs.com, hinojom@wellsfargo.com,
khcnb@arkansas.net, robyn_howard@aimfunds.com, vkamins@enron.com,
tknight@houstonenergy.org, paulcraiglaird2@netscape.net,
DWL@creativebranding.com, info@nutritionsoundbites.com,
adrian.a.nunez@usa.conoco.com, elizabeth_oldroyd@americancentury.com,
Jack_Plunkett@plunkettresearch.com, daricha@ppco.com, livvy@usa.net,
esjerve@canspec.com, alane_smith@transcanada.com, james.stanton@et.pge.com,
JStephenson@navigantco, dstowers@watersinfo.com, john_wackowski@prusec.com,
Woodybc@bp.com, dzerba@teldatasolutions.com
cc:
Subject: out of office

Dear Friends:

I will be out of the office on business from
 Friday, April 21, 2000 until Monday, May 8, 2000.

I will not have access to my email. I will be checking my voicemail on a
daily basis.  If you call my office, please tell my assistant that you would
like to leave me a voicemail message.

If you need to get a hold of me, you can page me at 888-502-7685.
I will return your call as soon as possible.

Thank you.

Jana Phillips


Hi Christie,

when do you sleep? 2 am, ugh!

ok,  you were correct, my invitation was to those people within Enron that
the students talked with before interviewing competitors, and it was an
invitation to the presentation only.  I didn't think any of them would be
invited to the dinner, and probably none will even come to the presentation.
The invitation did elicit one request for the final report though, so maybe
it wasn't a complete waste.

I didn't realize that the dinner had turned into a box visit.  that sounds
great.  I wish the group could have made it to dinner before the first game,
that would have made the whole slumming experience better.  Now they'll get
the royal treatment at Enron Field.  It'll be great.

Vince invited 4 people from Rice:

Dennis W. Loughridge, Director of Energy Consortium; lounghrid@rice.edu
Carrie Miller, Director of MBA Program; cmiller@rice.edu
Deborah Barrett, Inst. Communications, barrett@rice.edu
Dr. Wil Uecker, Associate Dean for Executive Education,uecker@rice.edu

Loughridge wrote back saying he'll come, I don't know about the others

Here are the 6 students emails:

"Ritwik \(Ronnie\) Ghosh" <ghoshr@rice.edu>, "Ivy Ghose" <ghosei@rice.edu>,
"Luigi Calabrese" <luigical@rice.edu>, "Pravas Sud" <pravas@rice.edu>, "Syed
\(Farhan\) Iqbal" <iqbal@rice.edu>
<cwomack@rice.edu>

your 2 from Rice makes a total of 12 from Rice, I guess

let me know if you would like me to do anything else related to Monday
look forward to seeing you then

ken


I'm out.  I'll be at the 4-C w/ the kids, coming back to meet Molly late
Sunday coming back from New Orleans.

-----Original Message-----
From: Parks, Joe [mailto:Joe.Parks@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 11:15 AM
To: Brian Constantine (E-mail); Chad Knipe (E-mail 2); Chet Fenner
(E-mail); Erik Wollam (E-mail); Todd Feder (E-mail)
Subject: Sunday Mar 17

Any interest in a little st. patty fest at my house sunday late afternoon,
with cabbage, potatoes, sausage, and beer. kids are welcome of course. Let
me know.

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Deals Closed--
 --Arizona Public Service - We sold 14,000 MMBtu/d to APS for April  - Oct,
2001 from EOT - Topock for $0.23.  This was the space we had tried   to sell
using the IOS last week.  The high bid then had been $.138/MMBtu and we
rejected the offer.  APS had not been a bidder in the IOS.

 --CIMA Energy agreed to an IT agreement for 5000 MMBtu/d on the Crawford
lateral.  This is an East-to-East deal at $0.065 plus fuel for 14 months
beginning Sept 2000.  This new shipper on TW will generate additional revenue
(had shipped under a Duke FT for $0.02).

 --Texaco has agreed to extend its contract from Red Cedar to Blanco from
January 1, 2001 through December 31, 2002 at $0.045.

 --Red Cedar - We have a verbal agreement on a 5 year deal with Red Cedar.
Final details are being negotiated but the volume would range from  100,000
to 150,000 MMBtu/d.  We will need to spend approximately $375,000 to expand
the metering capability of the Arkansas loop.

 --Sempra has agreed to an FT agreement for Ignacio to Blanco for 30,000
MMBtu/d.  The term is calendar 2001 for a $.06 rate.  We have approximately
30,000 MMBtu/d of remaining space available.

Burlington Resources - Burlington claims we are limiting production from
their Val Verde Plant because TW is unable to fully accept all the
nominations of gas under the current operating agreement.  They claim
approximately $135,000/month in lost revenues.  We are pulling together the
data on exactly which days we have not been able to take BR's gas.  Thus far
BR has rejected our revised wording in the interconnect amendment,
specifically "best efforts" and "subject to operating conditions on TW", so
we will need to revise this further.  We offered alternate receipt point
flexibility at Ignacio and alternate delivery point flexibility at El Paso
Blanco on their Jackrabbit contract but they do not think this is sufficient
to agree to amend the interconnect agreement.  They have suggested we
consider giving them a deeper discount on their San Juan - Waha contract
(80,000/d, $0.14, term 11/30/06) but this is not acceptable to TW.  We are
evaluating all options.

SouthWest Gas notified us they are within 90 days of being capable of
receiving gas through the new interconnect in Nevada.  Under the terms of the
agreement, we are now obligated to pay SWG the remaining CAIC of $417,500.

Transport Options Tariff--  Meetings were held this week with customers and
internal personnel to flange up remaining details of how the  program will
function.

Mid-year Employment Reviews were completed for all Team Members this week.


MEMORANDUM

TO: Environmental Issues Committee
                State Issues Committee

FROM: Frank Ferraro, Environmental Issues Committee Chair
                Jane Cahill, State Issues Committee Chair
                Samantha Slater, Manager of State and Regional Affairs

DATE: April 2, 2001

RE: NOx SIP Call Implementation - Draft EPSA Letters to Michigan
                and North Carolina Attached
? Comments Due By Wednesday, April 4th, Close of Business

Most of the 19 states subject to the NOx-SIP Call rule have submitted draft
or final plans to revise their state implementation plans (SIPs) to meet the
rule's emission-reduction requirements.  U.S. EPA is in various stages of
reviewing and taking action on the plans.  It is expected that Northeastern
states' plans will generally be acted upon first since they were among the
first to be submitted.

North Carolina and Michigan are both in the process of finalizing their plans
for implementing the NOx SIP-Call rule.  Both of their rules, as currently
drafted, contain approaches of particular concern to merchant suppliers.
Specifically, both feature provisions that could limit significantly the
number of allowances available to new generating facilities.

EPSA has drafted comments to these states advocating more reasonable
approaches, which will be more likely to ensure sufficient allowances to
support capacity additions.  A copy of the drafts is attached for review.
Please provide any comments on the letter to Samantha Slater at (202)
628-8200 or sslater@epsa.org no later than the close of business on
Wednesday, April 4th.  Please contact Samantha Slater at EPSA for further
information.

Attachments

 - EPSA NC letter.doc
 - EPSA MI letter.doc


Start Date: 1/28/02; HourAhead hour: 23;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002012823.txt


Please take the form of the Cayuga confid agreement, and substitute this name.

This is CA day!

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/22/2000 12:48
PM ---------------------------

Fred Mitro@ECT
12/22/2000 12:03 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: NRG-CA

Kay:

I talked with NRG (San Diego) regarding the CA for the 7EA purchase.

The NRG entity that will be executing the CA is:

 NRG Development Co., Inc.
 750 B Street
 San Diego, CA  92101
 Attention:  Mr. Scott Magie

If asked, I will relay to Scott that the form of the Agreement was based on
Enron's form utilized in all turbine transaction CA's.

hohohow's the egg flowing today on 38?

Fred


Hi Evening MBA students,

All of the course readers are in, if you are missing any.

Textbooks for  E234 Corporate Finance and E296-5 Project Management have
arrived also.  You may pick them up this week:

MONDAY in C132
5:30-6:00 p.m. and 7:30-8:00 p.m.

TUESDAY
in the Evening MBA office

WEDNESDAY in C132
5:30-6:00 p.m. and 7:30-8:00 p.m.

THURSDAY in C132
5:30-6:00 p.m. and 7:30-8:00 p.m.

Thanks!
TJ


What is the latest on this one?  I gather that they are still using
spreadsheets, which in and of itself is not necessarily a problem.  Are their
positions not being captured and aggregated?  What does Scott Mills have to
say about this?  --Sally
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 12/11/2000 11:05 AM
---------------------------

From:  Ted Murphy
12/01/2000 09:06 AM

To: Shona Wilson/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Bjorn Hagelmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cassandra
Schultz/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: EnPower production - Argentina Power

Shona,
When we returned from Argentina we concluded that a proper risk management
system needed to be implemented in order to posture the office for success.
They have been trading there for over 2 years which is plenty of time to do
so.  We used Enpower as a phrase meaning "Proper Risk System".  If there are
real questions about the functionality of such, then that obviously begs the
question as to why we allow someone to transact on behalf of Enron 7500 miles
away that doesn't understand.  That being said Mike Guerrero seems perfectly
hip to having the best platform available.  It was Enron NetWorks that said
that they could implement a "controlled spreadsheet environment" that would
have ALL the functionality of a proper risk system, including risk
aggregation into RisktRAC, credit aggregation and tracking, option valuation,
scalability, security and stability. I will not opine on such matters.  They
must produce or stop transacting.
Ted

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Shona Wilson @ ENRON                           11/17/2000 10:10 AM

To: Bjorn Hagelmann/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cassandra
Schultz/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: EnPower production - Argentina Power

I believe they have implemented a secure spreadsheet environment in which to
work.  I know I discussed this during a meeting with Ted and Donna a few
months ago and we decided we could live with the change to a secure
environment in lieu of a full EnPower implementation.  Although EnPower would
be great to have, if commercial decides that the office does not have the
transaction volume there is not much we can do.

As I understand it, there are further issues with capturing the appropriate
curve shift info from these offices in RiskTrac.  Let's discuss what we can
do and what decisions need to be made.

Thanks

Shona

To: Shona Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cassandra
Schultz/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: EnPower production - Argentina Power

Since this was a fix to a Doorstep finding, how do we react?
---------------------- Forwarded by Bjorn Hagelmann/HOU/ECT on 16/11/2000
17:25 ---------------------------

	From:  Scott Mills                           14/11/2000 13:46

To: Michael Guerriero/SA/Enron@Enron, Julian Poole/SA/Enron@Enron, Remi
Collonges/SA/Enron@Enron, Julie Ramos/SA/Enron@Enron
cc: Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martha Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah
Smith/Corp/Enron@Enron, Laura Feldman/SA/Enron@Enron, Xochitl
Figueroa/NA/Enron@Enron, Bjorn Hagelmann/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: EnPower production - Argentina Power

Lavarato has stopped efforts for implementing Enpower in South America until
business activity increases enough to support it.

Based on below, we will start looking for someone with strong Access/Excel
knowledge to come up with a different solution.  Everyone will have to
regroup and determine next steps and look at revised timelines.

SRM (x33548)
---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Mills/HOU/ECT on 11/14/2000 01:36
PM ---------------------------

	Enron Technology

	From:  Steve Nat @ ENRON                           11/14/2000 01:31 PM

To: Duong Luu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: EnPower production - Argentina Power

FYI...

---------------------- Forwarded by Steve Nat/Corp/Enron on 11/14/2000 01:12
PM ---------------------------
Beth Perlman @ ECT   11/14/2000 11:53 AM

To: Richard Burchfield/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Nat/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: EnPower production - Argentina Power

I discussed this with John Lavorato who is now responsible for this.  He said
don't do anything!  When their  volumes increase we can address the Enpower
implementation again.

Beth

	Richard Burchfield
	11/08/2000 08:17 AM

		 To: Steve Nat/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Beth Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: EnPower production - Argentina Power

Steve,
 Come by my office to discuss.

Richard

	Enron Technology

	From:  Steve Nat @ ENRON                           11/08/2000 08:07 AM

To: Richard Burchfield/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beth Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT, Duong Luu/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EnPower production - Argentina Power

Richard / Beth,  We have been asked by risk to get Argentina started on
EnPower.  Are you OK with us moving on this?  A couple things to consider...

Our instance strategy for EnPower is determined by geographic location
(bandwidth), volumes, and market similarity (functionality).  Based on this,
I want to set South America up on their own instance.  EnPower will have the
following instances long term:  EUR, US, CND, SA, AUS, JPN, IND.  We will
continue to pursue a common code base and logical data model.

There is additional time and cost associated with setting up a new instance,
however, I am concerned about continuing to pile new business units into a
production environment that will eventually need to be split.

Glad to discuss...  Please respond quickly, as we are waiting to pull the
trigger on this...

Steve

---------------------- Forwarded by Steve Nat/Corp/Enron on 11/08/2000 07:32
AM ---------------------------
From: Duong Luu@ECT on 11/07/2000 01:06 PM
To: Steve Nat/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard Burchfield/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beth
Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: EnPower production - Argentina Power

fyi

----- Forwarded by Duong Luu/HOU/ECT on 11/07/2000 01:05 PM -----

	Trang Le
	11/07/2000 12:53 PM

		 To: Duong Luu/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Martha Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah Smith/Corp/Enron@Enron, Juana
Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Scott
Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Elwood/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: EnPower production - Argentina Power

Duong,
Per our phone conversation, below is the list of people that would need
access to EnPower production.

User Names:   NT ID:  Extension:
Scott Mills   SMills  x3-3548
Martha Stevens  MSteven x3-4742
Sarah Smith   SSmith  x3-0997
Juana Fayette  JFayett  x3-0992
Jana Morse  JMorse  x6-8265
Trang Le  TLe1  x3-6996

Currently, the Argentine Power group has in total about 20 physical forward
deals  which will be done under Enron Comercializadora De Energia Argentina
S.A.(Co. 027W) and one financial deal which will be done under Enron North
America (Co. 0364). Given the fact that we'll also have deals on ENA, I would
think that we could be on the Houston server. Just let us know.
In the mean time, we'll be working with the various Global groups to have the
proper desk, portfolio, facilities etc.... set up.

Thanks for your help,
Trang x3-6996


Due to system constraints all Shippers must stay within contract swing
limits.

Imbalance makeup may be scheduled with prior approval from your
Transportation Administrator.

TXU LSP will be performing line replacement on Line X the second week of
May, scheduled for May 7th and 8th requiring a reduction in receipt volumes
into the pipe between West Texas and Ft. Worth.
TXU LSP will be performing smart pig maintenance activities on Line V the
3rd week of May, scheduled for May 21st and 24th, requiring shut in of
receipts between Groesbeck & Iola.  Also, on May 24, the Midcon point will
be down.
TXU LSP will be performing line replacement on Line V4 the second week of
May, schedule for May 7-11, affecting only the Dow interconnect and the
Crosstex interconnect in Ft. Bend Co.

In our ongoing effort to keep TXU Lone Star Pipeline customers aware of
current Daily Available Capacity on our system, TXU Lone Star Pipeline is
pleased to provide you an estimate of available capacity on the TXU Lone
Star Pipeline system.  This is a Microsoft Excel document.  Simply click on
the attachment to view or download to your hard drive.  If you wish to be
removed from this notification, or if you wish to add another person from
your organization, please provide your name, company name, e-mail address
and/or fax number to David Flowers at 214-875-2092 (or via e-mail at
davidflowers@txu.com). TXU Lone Star Pipeline shall not be liable for any
Customers' failure to receive such e-mails. The information transmitted is
intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may
contain confidential and/or privileged material.  Any review,
retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in
reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient is prohibited.  If you received this in error, please
contact the sender and delete the material from your computer.

(See attached file: TXULSP Avail Cap Elec Gen.xls)


Jeff - the total AEP amount for physical gas that they didn't pay is $24,786,406.47.  Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Valderrama, Lisa
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 12:11 PM
To:	Baxter, Bryce
Subject:	AEP

Here are the counterparties that have not paid due to relationship with AEP

ENA
AEP Energy Services  $23,734,253.90
AEP\HPL $ 286,400.00
Public Service of North Carolina $7,775.00
Public Service of Oklahoma $ 413,849.11
Southwestern Electric Power Company $ 308,450.56

ENA Upstream
AEP\HPL $35,677.90

Lisa


Briant,

I'm not going to be interested.  I'm looking for a boat that is a little
bigger.  Thanks.

D

Briant Baker
03/21/2001 08:17 AM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Boat

I checked the boat and it is 17 ft, 7 in. long, it is a Capri model # 1750CH,
it has a am/fm cass.  The motor is 3.0L MerCruiser Alpha Sterndrive (135 hp)


Gerald,

See my edits. I will call soon.

Bill
>>> <Gerald.Nemec@enron.com> 04/04/01 11:05AM >>>
Bill,  Attached is our reponse to the letter we received from AEC.  I made
a few changes to Chris's version.  Please review and let me know if you
have any suggestions.  If possible, we would like to send this out today.

(See attached file: Project Blackwater-AEC Response Letter (4.4.01)a.doc)

Katz, Kutter Haigler, Alderman, Bryant & Yon et al
106 East College Avenue, Suite 1200
Tallahassee, FL  32301
(850) 224-9634
www.katzlaw.com
_______________________________________

This transmission is intended to be delivered only to the named addressee(s)
and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary, attorney
work-product or attorney-client privileged.  If this information is received
by anyone other than the named addressee(s), the recipient should immediately
notify the sender by E-MAIL and by telephone (850) 224-9634 and obtain
instructions as to the disposal of the transmitted material.  In no event
shall this material be read, used, copied, reproduced, stored or retained by
anyone other than the named addressee(s), except with the express consent of
the sender or the named addressee(s).  Thank you.

 - Project Blackwater-AEC Response Letter (4.4.01)a.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by David Forster/Corp/Enron on 07/19/2000
12:15 PM ---------------------------

Edmund Cooper
09/03/99 02:24 PM
To: David Forster/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Online docs

Dave,

Here are all the Online docs in both Word and HTML format!  We have not been
able to put the PAs for Italy, Poland, Romania and Spain onto one page; we
also had problems the with table in the US Coal GTC.  I suggest that someone
with Web text editing expertise has a go at them.

I've included the new Canadian Gas GTCs (NIT Gas and Canada Gas) and the
replacement US Coal GTC. But not, the power GTCs sent over earlier or the
other US Gas GTCs.  I'm awaiting instruction in accordance with my earlier
emails.

Thanks Edmund.

PAs

Euro ETAs

NA PA and ETA

Singapore PA and ETA

Euro GTCs (with collateral)

Euro GTCs (without collateral)

US GTC (with collateral)

US GTC (without collateral)


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Dilworth, Mark
Sent:	Friday, November 30, 2001 8:57 AM
To:	Goddard, Paul; Kitchen, Louise; Jafry, Rahil; Port, David; Webb, Jay
Subject:	FW: they're trying to blame us now !

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kearton, Peter
Sent:	Friday, November 30, 2001 2:40 PM
To:	Campbell, Robert; Dilworth, Mark
Subject:	they're trying to blame us now !

http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/business/newsid_1684000/1684503.stm


It won't let me open the document.  Can you ressend it?

	Carlos Alatorre/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/01/2001 04:14 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Lisa Lees/ENRON@enronXgate, Stephanie Sever/ENRON@enronXgate
		 Subject: FX Top Counterparties

Please see below list of Top counterparties to have access to FX product
Please let me know if you have any questions/comments
Thanks
Carlos


Exception handling coding changes are nearly complete.  TJ had to weave through the code for 402 all the way, as well as add 3 new function points: EPMI exceptions, ISO exceptions, and repeating (scavenging, he calls it) the exception roll up function from another module.  He has a test environment set up and is testing EPMI variance allocations, EPMI exceptions and ISO exceptions.  He has not yet done the 'scavenging' part.  He will be finished with 402 tonight, and tomorrow I will test the results on one of the days where I had samples of these exceptions.

The part of 405 that needs to be changed is for EPMI exception handling, which should be a much less involved endeavor.

For 403, I attempted to follow all of the queries through to see if I could run some tests within the environment and determine what was being pulled as a variance, and how that variance was being allocated.  However, these queries are currently beyond my expertise (I plan to rectify that).  We are going to enlist Anna's help as much as possible for 403, and get to the bottom of what is happening.  As a side note, for the time change date, we have an extra HE 2, and the ISO has HE 25.  We are also going to get with Anna on how to resolve that.

For the regular actualizations, I have set 10/1 - 10/18 (except 10/16) to M today.  There is a strange anomaly going on on the 16th, and neither Donna nor I could figure out what.  I will get back to it.

Anticipate completion of all by Monday, May 7.

Caroline

__________________________________________________________________________________________________
To:	Chris Stokley/ENRON@enronXgate, Donna Johnson/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:
Subject:	Status of Actualizations - October Deviation Preliminaries and 'Other' Finals

Exception handling in 402 and 405 not coded properly.   Tj working on enhancing the codes to handle them correctly, and anticipates being done with 402 by tomorrow afternoon, and 405 by mid-day Wednesday.

Final actualizations for the regular charge codes are complete and set to M through October 10.

Will perform additional research into the improper allocations for 403 on Tuesday.  The unallocated volume on 10/1 is approx 300MW, so I will focus my research on that day.

Estimate completion date of all (deviations, prelim and final, and regular charge codes, final) Monday, May 7.

Caroline

---------------------- Forwarded by Caroline Emmert/HOU/ECT on 04/30/2001 06:44 PM ---------------------------
To:	Chris Stokley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Johnson/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	Status of Deviation Actualizations - October Preliminaries

I have started the actualization process with 403 Load Deviation, and need to work closely with TJ on Monday to find out why the allocations don't match the variances.  I have isolated one day, zone and hour and will work on that with him.  We have got to get it working properly, or else there will be a lot of manual work required.

404 Export Deviation is complete for October, and the records can be set to A with the other days as normal.

405 Import Deviation needs the new calcs that will be provided by a re-run of SettleSupplemental, which I am going to kick off just before I leave.  I will run that on Monday while TJ is researching the 403 errors/problems.

402 Gen Deviation will also be started on Monday.

Tentative target date for completion of Prelim's is next Thursday, and Finals on Friday.

See you Monday.

Caroline


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/06/2001 06:05 PM -----

	Shieldsenron@aol.com
	04/04/2001 06:50 PM

		 To: jeff.dasovich@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Reminder letter for California filing deadline

 - dasovich.rl.ca.4-4-01.DOC


---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 01/07/2000
12:34 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Maria Sandoval                           01/07/2000 09:45 AM

To: Andrea R Guillen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chantelle Villanueva/HOU/ECT@ECT, Margo
Reyna/HOU/EES@EES, Cecilia Olvera/HOU/ECT@ECT, Irena D Hogan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Elizabeth Soto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa
Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheetal Patel/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lorraine Becker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angela Henn/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kristie Youngblood/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hannah Ortiz/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: WOW! Another New Years

ENJOY!!!
---------------------- Forwarded by Maria Sandoval/HOU/ECT on 01/07/2000
09:43 AM ---------------------------

Yolanda Sandoval <Yolanda.Sandoval@Halliburton.com> on 01/07/2000 09:39:51 AM
To: "'Castillo, Margaret'" <MCastillo@metromkt.com>, "'Beverly Taylor'"
<bevctaylor@aol.com>, "'Gilbert Hernandez'" <ghernandez@sbec.com>, Maria
Sandoval/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tammy Brzozowski <Tammy.Brzozowski@Halliburton.com>,
"'Tony Nunez'" <anthony.nunez@chase.com>, Ursula Tovar
<Ursula.Tovar@Halliburton.com>, Sylvia Balderas
<Sylvia.Balderas@Halliburton.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: WOW! Another New Years

Yolanda Sandoval
KBR Legal Dept.
713-753-5986
yolanda.sandoval@halliburton.com

 <<One World~Many Parties.pps>>

 - One World~Many Parties.pps


Sounds great - I'm thinking tomorrow or Wednesday night might be the best,
but let me know what works for you. Glad you survived a weekend with the
"lesser" of the journalistic species.

Talk to you soon,
Kate

John Enders <jenders@ap.org> on 04/23/2001 10:07:48 AM
To: kate.symes@enron.com
cc:

Subject: a beer

Hi. I'm back from Sunriver, and survived a hundred broadcasters. God...
Still wanna try to get together this week for a beer after work?
John


I agree.  This is not a big enough dollar issue for them to make a huge
stink, is it?  If it is, can't we match them stink for stink with all the
imbalance penalties we have forgiven in the past?  DF

	From:  Mary Kay Miller                           04/21/2000 02:15 PM

To: Lynn Blair/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kent Miller
cc: Mary Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julia White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Joni
Bollinger/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Loren Penkava/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Larry
Berger/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Pamela Carter/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lynn
Blair/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: UCU PPA Tiering Issue

Based on the above, it seems that the decision to advise them we can't retier
still stands.  Isn't there a way to give them the $30,000 of value in another
manner which doesn't make us file for waiver? Alternatively, we have given up
more than this in the past to resolve their errors, don't adjust?   We can
still tell them we plan to address in our Order 637 filing-  MK

   Lynn Blair                04/21/2000 10:07 AM

To: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julia
White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Joni Bollinger/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Loren
Penkava/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen
Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Larry Berger/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Pamela Carter/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lynn
Blair/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: UCU PPA Tiering Issue

For PPA's in November, 1999, December, 1999, January, 2000 and February,
2000, the UCU issue of tiering is only with the November, 1999 PPA of
$30,475.61. All other PPA's are at Tier 1.

Please let me know if you have any questions.  Thanks. Lynn


Sara -

I would like to discuss with you a potential opportunity at WAPA Sierra
Nevada.  We have just sent them an EEI and would like you to send them an
ISDA.  Basically in the near future they might find themselves quite short
due to a PG&E contract being invalidated.  If that happens they will either:

1. Buy physical power from the market (use our EEI)
2.Do a financial swap with the market and continue to do the physical index
with PG&E (there are some reasons for this which I am not 100% sure on).

The lawyer we have dealt with is Koji Kawamura and his email address is:

kawamura@wapa.gov

Thanks for your help - If you have any questions please let me know.

Stewart Rosman


FYI - from MARTA's attorney

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Bromberg, Bruce L." <blbromberg@itsmarta.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Bromberg+2C+20Bruce+20L+2E+22+20+3Cblbromberg+40itsmarta+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, September 18, 2001 8:08 AM
To:	Panus, Stephanie
Subject:	RE: ISDA Master Agreement

I have no comment on or changes to the Master Agreement.

I have forwarded your message to Mr. Pursley. He will prepare a revised
opinion.

-----Original Message-----
From: Panus, Stephanie [mailto:Stephanie.Panus@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 12:59 PM
To: blbromberg@itsmarta.com
Cc: Shackleton, Sara; Williams, Jason R (Credit)
Subject: ISDA Master Agreement

Mr. Bromberg,

We have spoken to Thay Bishop regarding the ISDA Master Agreement (the
"Agreement") between MARTA and Enron North America Corp. ("ENA").  Ms.
Bishop stated that she did not have any comments or changes to the
Agreement, and that I should check with you for any changes.  You stated
previously that you did not have any changes - can you please confirm?

We have received the fax of MARTA's outside counsel's legal opinion and
have the following comments:

1.  The first (introductory) paragraph references the date of the ISDA
Master Agreement as June 1, 2001.  The Agreement will be dated May 11,
2001, which is the trade date of the outstanding transaction between
MARTA and ENA.

2.  Since Thay Bishop is unwilling to request another resolution from
MARTA's Board, the legal opinion should specifically reference the
resolution dated April 23, 2001 that has been provided, and that such
resolution is sufficient to grant the authority to enter into the ISDA
Master Agreement and any related documents.

3.   We request that Section 10 of the legal opinion  be revised to add
the following bolded language:  "No person, firm, corporation, entity or
association other than Counterparty may liquidate, borrow, encumber, or
otherwise utilize the assets (including, without limitation, the general
operating fund) of Counterparty."

If you can make these changes to the legal opinion, and if there are no
changes to the ISDA Master Agreement, we can prepare the Agreement for
execution.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or Sara
Shackleton (713/853-5620).

We look forward to hearing from you.

Stephanie Panus
Enron Wholesale Services - Legal
1400 Smith Street, EB3803C
Houston, Texas  77002
ph:  713.345.3249
fax:  713.646.3490
email:  stephanie.panus@enron.com

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************

 - C.DTF


---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 12/21/99 02:40
PM ---------------------------

"Special Offers Admin" <special-offers-admin@mail.southwest.com> on 12/21/99
12:35:15 AM
Please respond to "Special Offers" <special-offers@mail.southwest.com>
To: "Special Offers" <special-offers@mail.southwest.com>
cc:  (bcc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT)
Subject: Southwest Airlines Internet Specials December 21, 1999

Southwest Airlines Click 'n SaveSM E-mail Update for
December 21, 1999

Please pass this great news on to your friends! To subscribe
to Southwest Airlines Click 'n Save E-mail Updates,
visit http://www.southwest.com/email

Southwest Airlines Click 'n Save Internet Specials at
http://www.southwest.com/hotfares

** These fares are valid for travel January 11, 2000
through June 9, 2000, except for May 26 and 29, 2000.
Ticketless travel must be purchased online at
www.southwest.com by midnight Pacific Standard Time
December 23, 1999. ** Please see Other Terms and
Conditions of these fares at the end of this e-mail.

The fares listed do not include airport-assessed passenger
facility charges (PFCs) of up to $12 roundtrip. Roundtrip
purchase and overnight stay are required. Fares do not
include a federal excise tax of $2.50 that will be imposed
on each flight segment of your itinerary. A flight segment
is defined as a takeoff and a landing.

Fares shown are each way based on roundtrip purchase

Albuquerque:
 $37 each way to/from Amarillo
 $35 each way to/from El Paso
 $65 each way to/from Los Angeles
 $39 each way to/from Lubbock
 $89 each way to/from Orlando
 $35 each way to/from Phoenix
 $89 each way to/from St. Louis

Amarillo:
 $37 each way to/from Albuquerque
 $87 each way to/from Corpus Christi
 $35 each way to/from Dallas Love
 $89 each way to/from Kansas City
 $89 each way to/from Los Angeles

Austin:
 $60 each way to/from El Paso
 $35 each way to/from Houston Hobby
 $89 each way to/from Long Island/Islip
 $89 each way to/from Los Angeles
 $70 each way to/from New Orleans

Baltimore/Washington:
 $51 each way to/from Birmingham
 $66 each way to/from Jackson
 $89 each way to/from Las Vegas
 $35 each way to/from Louisville
 $89 each way to/from Phoenix

Birmingham:
 $51 each way to/from Baltimore/Washington
 $62 each way to/from Houston Hobby
 $36 each way to/from New Orleans

Boise:
 $52 each way to/from Las Vegas
 $62 each way to/from Oakland
 $33 each way to/from Seattle

Burbank:
 $89 each way to/from Detroit
 $62 each way to/from El Paso
 $33 each way to/from Las Vegas
 $36 each way to/from Oakland
 $31 each way to/from Phoenix

Chicago Midway:
 $35 each way to/from Columbus
 $35 each way to/from Detroit
 $87 each way to/from Ft. Lauderdale
 $30 each way to/from Indianapolis
 $39 each way to/from Kansas City
 $89 each way to/from Los Angeles
 $31 each way to/from Louisville
 $42 each way to/from Nashville
 $89 each way to/from Oakland

Cleveland:
 $41 each way to/from Louisville
 $59 each way to/from Manchester
 $35 each way to/from Nashville
 $60 each way to/from Omaha
 $43 each way to/from St. Louis

Columbus:
 $35 each way to/from Chicago Midway
 $89 each way to/from Los Angeles
 $60 each way to/from Orlando
 $35 each way to/from St. Louis

Corpus Christi:
 $87 each way to/from Amarillo
 $47 each way to/from Dallas Love
 $37 each way to/from Houston Hobby
 $64 each way to/from Little Rock

Dallas Love:
 $35 each way to/from Amarillo
 $47 each way to/from Corpus Christi
 $55 each way to/from El Paso
 $58 each way to/from Harlingen (South Padre Island)
 $35 each way to/from Lubbock
 $35 each way to/from Midland/Odessa
 $48 each way to/from New Orleans
 $35 each way to/from Oklahoma City
 $35 each way to/from San Antonio
 $35 each way to/from Tulsa

Detroit:
 $89 each way to/from Burbank
 $35 each way to/from Chicago Midway
 $88 each way to/from Jacksonville
 $41 each way to/from Louisville
 $53 each way to/from Nashville
 $60 each way to/from Omaha
 $50 each way to/from Raleigh-Durham

El Paso:
 $35 each way to/from Albuquerque
 $60 each way to/from Austin
 $62 each way to/from Burbank
 $55 each way to/from Dallas Love
 $39 each way to/from Lubbock
 $57 each way to/from San Antonio
 $84 each way to/from San Jose

Ft. Lauderdale:
 $87 each way to/from Chicago Midway
 $69 each way to/from Hartford/Springfield
 $30 each way to/from Jacksonville
 $89 each way to/from Las Vegas
 $89 each way to/from Phoenix
 $30 each way to/from Tampa Bay

Harlingen (South Padre Island):
 $58 each way to/from Dallas Love
 $37 each way to/from San Antonio

Hartford/Springfield:
 $69 each way to/from Ft. Lauderdale
 $89 each way to/from Houston Hobby
 $48 each way to/from Raleigh-Durham
 $77 each way to/from St. Louis

Houston Bush Intercontinental:
 $54 each way to/from Little Rock

Houston Hobby:
 $35 each way to/from Austin
 $62 each way to/from Birmingham
 $37 each way to/from Corpus Christi
 $89 each way to/from Hartford/Springfield
 $54 each way to/from Little Rock
 $89 each way to/from Long Island/Islip
 $89 each way to/from Los Angeles
 $89 each way to/from Manchester
 $39 each way to/from New Orleans
 $89 each way to/from Providence
 $67 each way to/from St. Louis
 $89 each way to/from San Francisco

Indianapolis:
 $30 each way to/from Chicago Midway
 $68 each way to/from Manchester
 $89 each way to/from Phoenix
 $35 each way to/from St. Louis
 $64 each way to/from Tampa Bay
 $50 each way to/from Tulsa

Jackson, MS:
 $66 each way to/from Baltimore/Washington
 $69 each way to/from Kansas City

Jacksonville:
 $88 each way to/from Detroit
 $30 each way to/from Ft. Lauderdale
 $49 each way to/from Nashville

Kansas City:
 $89 each way to/from Amarillo
 $39 each way to/from Chicago Midway
 $69 each way to/from Jackson
 $35 each way to/from Oklahoma City
 $89 each way to/from Phoenix
 $89 each way to/from Sacramento
 $30 each way to/from St. Louis
 $89 each way to/from Salt Lake City

Las Vegas:
 $89 each way to/from Baltimore/Washington
 $52 each way to/from Boise
 $33 each way to/from Burbank
 $89 each way to/from Ft. Lauderdale
 $89 each way to/from Manchester
 $89 each way to/from Nashville
 $89 each way to/from New Orleans
 $38 each way to/from Salt Lake City
 $89 each way to/from San Antonio
 $38 each way to/from San Diego
 $50 each way to/from San Francisco
 $41 each way to/from San Jose
 $33 each way to/from Tucson

Little Rock:
 $64 each way to/from Corpus Christi
 $54 each way to/from Houston Bush Intercontinental
 $54 each way to/from Houston Hobby
 $60 each way to/from Lubbock
 $35 each way to/from St. Louis
 $44 each way to/from Tulsa

Long Island/Islip:
 $89 each way to/from Austin
 $89 each way to/from Houston Hobby
 $89 each way to/from Los Angeles
 $70 each way to/from St. Louis

Los Angeles:
 $65 each way to/from Albuquerque
 $89 each way to/from Amarillo
 $89 each way to/from Austin
 $89 each way to/from Chicago Midway
 $89 each way to/from Columbus
 $89 each way to/from Houston Hobby
 $89 each way to/from Long Island/Islip
 $89 each way to/from Manchester
 $36 each way to/from Oakland
 $89 each way to/from Orlando
 $31 each way to/from Phoenix
 $70 each way to/from Portland
 $36 each way to/from Sacramento
 $36 each way to/from San Jose
 $72 each way to/from Seattle
 $84 each way to/from Spokane
 $31 each way to/from Tucson
 $89 each way to/from Tulsa

Louisville:
 $35 each way to/from Baltimore/Washington
 $31 each way to/from Chicago Midway
 $41 each way to/from Cleveland
 $41 each way to/from Detroit

Lubbock:
 $39 each way to/from Albuquerque
 $35 each way to/from Dallas Love
 $39 each way to/from El Paso
 $60 each way to/from Little Rock
 $89 each way to/from New Orleans

Manchester:
 $59 each way to/from Cleveland
 $89 each way to/from Houston Hobby
 $68 each way to/from Indianapolis
 $89 each way to/from Las Vegas
 $89 each way to/from Los Angeles
 $89 each way to/from Oakland
 $73 each way to/from Orlando

Midland/Odessa:
 $35 each way to/from Dallas Love
 $56 each way to/from Oklahoma City
 $63 each way to/from Phoenix

Nashville:
 $42 each way to/from Chicago Midway
 $35 each way to/from Cleveland
 $53 each way to/from Detroit
 $49 each way to/from Jacksonville
 $89 each way to/from Las Vegas
 $36 each way to/from New Orleans
 $89 each way to/from Salt Lake City
 $56 each way to/from Tampa Bay

New Orleans:
 $70 each way to/from Austin
 $36 each way to/from Birmingham
 $48 each way to/from Dallas Love
 $39 each way to/from Houston Hobby
 $89 each way to/from Las Vegas
 $89 each way to/from Lubbock
 $36 each way to/from Nashville
 $89 each way to/from Oakland
 $56 each way to/from San Antonio

Oakland:
 $62 each way to/from Boise
 $36 each way to/from Burbank
 $89 each way to/from Chicago Midway
 $36 each way to/from Los Angeles
 $89 each way to/from Manchester
 $89 each way to/from New Orleans
 $43 each way to/from Portland
 $30 each way to/from Reno/Tahoe
 $40 each way to/from San Diego
 $40 each way to/from Seattle
 $62 each way to/from Tucson

Oklahoma City:
 $35 each way to/from Dallas Love
 $35 each way to/from Kansas City
 $56 each way to/from Midland/Odessa

Omaha:
 $60 each way to/from Cleveland
 $60 each way to/from Detroit
 $31 each way to/from St. Louis

Ontario, CA:
 $71 each way to/from Portland
 $36 each way to/from Sacramento
 $48 each way to/from Salt Lake City
 $89 each way to/from San Antonio
 $36 each way to/from San Jose
 $72 each way to/from Seattle
 $84 each way to/from Spokane

Orlando:
 $89 each way to/from Albuquerque
 $60 each way to/from Columbus
 $89 each way to/from Los Angeles
 $73 each way to/from Manchester
 $73 each way to/from Providence
 $80 each way to/from St. Louis
 $87 each way to/from San Antonio
 $89 each way to/from San Jose
 $89 each way to/from Seattle

Phoenix:
 $35 each way to/from Albuquerque
 $89 each way to/from Baltimore/Washington
 $31 each way to/from Burbank
 $89 each way to/from Ft. Lauderdale
 $89 each way to/from Indianapolis
 $89 each way to/from Kansas City
 $31 each way to/from Los Angeles
 $63 each way to/from Midland/Odessa
 $60 each way to/from Sacramento
 $50 each way to/from Salt Lake City
 $31 each way to/from San Diego
 $58 each way to/from San Francisco
 $89 each way to/from Tulsa

Portland:
 $70 each way to/from Los Angeles
 $43 each way to/from Oakland
 $71 each way to/from Ontario
 $43 each way to/from San Jose
 $30 each way to/from Spokane

Providence:
 $89 each way to/from Houston Hobby
 $73 each way to/from Orlando

Raleigh-Durham:
 $50 each way to/from Detroit
 $48 each way to/from Hartford/Springfield
 $40 each way to/from Tampa Bay

Reno/Tahoe:
 $30 each way to/from Oakland
 $36 each way to/from Salt Lake City
 $30 each way to/from San Jose
 $46 each way to/from Seattle

Sacramento:
 $89 each way to/from Kansas City
 $36 each way to/from Los Angeles
 $36 each way to/from Ontario
 $60 each way to/from Phoenix
 $40 each way to/from San Diego

St. Louis:
 $89 each way to/from Albuquerque
 $43 each way to/from Cleveland
 $35 each way to/from Columbus
 $77 each way to/from Hartford/Springfield
 $67 each way to/from Houston Hobby
 $35 each way to/from Indianapolis
 $30 each way to/from Kansas City
 $35 each way to/from Little Rock
 $70 each way to/from Long Island/Islip
 $31 each way to/from Omaha
 $80 each way to/from Orlando

Salt Lake City:
 $89 each way to/from Kansas City
 $38 each way to/from Las Vegas
 $89 each way to/from Nashville
 $48 each way to/from Ontario
 $50 each way to/from Phoenix
 $36 each way to/from Reno/Tahoe
 $54 each way to/from San Diego
 $54 each way to/from Seattle

San Antonio:
 $35 each way to/from Dallas Love
 $57 each way to/from El Paso
 $37 each way to/from Harlingen (South Padre Island)
 $89 each way to/from Las Vegas
 $56 each way to/from New Orleans
 $89 each way to/from Ontario
 $87 each way to/from Orlando

San Diego:
 $38 each way to/from Las Vegas
 $40 each way to/from Oakland
 $31 each way to/from Phoenix
 $40 each way to/from Sacramento
 $54 each way to/from Salt Lake City
 $72 each way to/from Seattle
 $89 each way to/from Tampa Bay

San Francisco:
 $89 each way to/from Houston Hobby
 $50 each way to/from Las Vegas
 $58 each way to/from Phoenix

San Jose:
 $84 each way to/from El Paso
 $41 each way to/from Las Vegas
 $36 each way to/from Los Angeles
 $36 each way to/from Ontario
 $89 each way to/from Orlando
 $43 each way to/from Portland
 $30 each way to/from Reno/Tahoe

Seattle:
 $33 each way to/from Boise
 $72 each way to/from Los Angeles
 $40 each way to/from Oakland
 $72 each way to/from Ontario
 $89 each way to/from Orlando
 $46 each way to/from Reno/Tahoe
 $54 each way to/from Salt Lake City
 $72 each way to/from San Diego
 $30 each way to/from Spokane

Spokane:
 $84 each way to/from Los Angeles
 $84 each way to/from Ontario
 $30 each way to/from Portland
 $30 each way to/from Seattle

Tampa Bay:
 $30 each way to/from Ft. Lauderdale
 $64 each way to/from Indianapolis
 $56 each way to/from Nashville
 $40 each way to/from Raleigh-Durham
 $89 each way to/from San Diego

Tucson:
 $33 each way to/from Las Vegas
 $31 each way to/from Los Angeles
 $62 each way to/from Oakland

Tulsa:
 $35 each way to/from Dallas Love
 $50 each way to/from Indianapolis
 $44 each way to/from Little Rock
 $89 each way to/from Los Angeles
 $89 each way to/from Phoenix

Southwest Airlines Click 'n Save Internet Specials
Other Terms and Conditions:

Tickets must be purchased through the Southwest Airlines
web site at http://www.southwest.com The fares listed
above are per person for each way of travel. Click 'n Save
Internet Specials require roundtrip travel and an overnight
stay. Fares listed are for general information only and
are not a reflection of current seat availability. Travel
may originate in either direction. Roundtrip travel must
be between the same origin airport and the same destination
airport.

Click 'n Save Internet Specials are nonchangeable and
nonrefundable. Ticketless Travel Online may only be
purchased with a credit card. Customers holding funds from
a previously unused trip on Southwest Airlines or Customers
who have Southwest Airlines vouchers will not be able to use
those forms of payment for Ticketless Travel Online.

Click 'n Save Internet Specials may not be combined with
any other fares. Seats are limited and won't be available
on some flights that operate during very busy travel times
and holiday periods. Any change to the reservation (flights,
dates, cities, and/or names of passengers) once purchased
will result in a fare increase. Standby travel requires an
upgrade to the full unrestricted fare.

Of course, if your favorite city is not listed, we have many
other incredible fares to all Southwest cities. To find more
great fares on Southwest Airlines, please visit Ticketless
Travel Online or check our Fares Information online at
http://www.southwest.com

************************************************************
Southwest Airlines Vacations can take you to the slopes or
take you to Las Vegas! Visit our Thrilling Thursdays at
http://www.swavacations.com/index1.htm and take advantage
of our weekly specials!
************************************************************

This is a post only mailing from Southwest Airlines.
Please do not attempt to respond to this message.

Copyright 1999 Southwest Airlines Co. All Rights Reserved.

---
You are currently subscribed to special-offers as: [sshackl@ect.enron.com]
To unsubscribe, send email to
leave-special-offers-97904730L@mail.southwest.com
or unsubscribe anytime at http://www.southwest.com/email


Agreed.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Herndon, Rogers
Sent:	Tuesday, June 26, 2001 10:52 AM
To:	Aucoin, Berney C.
Cc:	Presto, Kevin M.
Subject:	RE: RAC sigs

Berney -

I think that we need to go with

> 1 million Mwh = Presto
> 2 million Mwh = Lavo

This may still be too restrictive and burdensome on Lavo and Presto.

Kevin - what do you think?

Rogers
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Aucoin, Berney C.
Sent:	Tuesday, June 26, 2001 10:48 AM
To:	Herndon, Rogers
Subject:	FW: RAC sigs

Is the level for Presto/Belden still too low? What about 500,000 or 1 million?

Thoughts?

Bern

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Belden, Tim
Sent:	Monday, June 25, 2001 3:52 PM
To:	Cutler, Karen; Herndon, Rogers
Cc:	Richter, Jeff; Aucoin, Berney C.; Presto, Kevin M.; Perry, Todd
Subject:	RE: RAC sigs

California deals done during the next two weeks need to be signed by Perry, Richter, and Belden.  Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cutler, Karen
Sent:	Monday, June 25, 2001 1:40 PM
To:	Herndon, Rogers; Belden, Tim
Cc:	Richter, Jeff; Aucoin, Berney C.; Presto, Kevin M.; Perry, Todd
Subject:	RAC sigs

While soliciting signatures for the IBM DASH, John Lavorato stated that Rogers Herndon and/or Tim Belden should sign the RAC DASH.  Effective immediately, we will remove Lavorato from the Approval to Issue Executable Pricing and the RAC DASH signature page.  With these changes in place, the approval authority for the EWS Power Desks will be as follows:

			 << OLE Object: Picture (Metafile) >>

Please let me know as soon as possible if you have any changes.  In the meantime, we will proceed with the approval authorities above.


John and Louise,
To minimize confusion, these are the individuals that I have earmarked for RETENTION in my group:

A. ENA
1. Tholan, Scott
2. Johnston, Robert
3. Landry, Kimberly
4. Walsh, Kristin
5.  Purswell, Sharon (Admin Assistant.  ADDED her for help in group layoffs and ongoing billing)
6.  Schlesinger, Judy  (eSource/Research)

B. The "TAC Group" (to be settled separately)
1.  Clark, Chris
2.  Mihura, Brian
3.  Sugiura, Junichi
4.  Loup, Jason
5.  Boehm, Richard
6.  Orbeck, Dan
7.  Chancey, Donald
8.  Kooser, Kenneth
9.  Wingo, Angie
(Also, two temporary workers are being retained)

C. EES
1. Golden, Kevin

D. EGM ("Future Termination" Status, 30-90 days, to support Oil trading)
1.  Seigle, Clayton

E.  FALLON (Jim is retaining this guy for himself for his use in the layoffs)
1. McGuinness, Francis


Paul:
Just a few questions for you on the revised EEI master that we received from
Engage today:

1. I just want to confirm that the collateral thresholds should be 9 million.

2. They want to have Section 8.1(b) and 8.2(b) apply which requires a party
to post collateral if the other party believes that its creditworthiness is
unsatisfactory.

2. In our Schedule, we delete the 3 day cure period for an event of default
that occurs as a result of a Guarantor's non-payment.  They want the cure
period.  do you care?

3. In Section 5.7, each party can suspend performance if a Potential Event of
Default or an Event of Default occurs. They want to delete Potential Event of
Default.

4. They want to extend the right to dispute invoices and to request
adjustments to statements or payments from 12 months to 18 months.

5. They want to change the consent to assignments standard from being able to
withhold consent in one's sole discretion to being able to withhold consent
only when it is reasonable to do so.

I look forward to hearing from you.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


NOTE:  YOU WILL RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE EACH TIME YOU ARE SELECTED AS A REVIEWER.

You have been selected to participate in the Year End 2000 Performance
Management process by providing meaningful feedback on specific employee(s).
Your feedback plays an important role in the process, and your participation
is critical to the success of Enron's Performance Management goals.

To complete requests for feedback, access PEP at http://pep.corp.enron.com
and select Perform Review under Performance Review Services.  You may begin
providing feedback immediately and are requested to have all feedback forms
completed by Friday, November 17, 2000.

If you have any questions regarding PEP or your responsibility in the
process, please contact the PEP Help Desk at:

Houston: 1.713.853.4777, Option 4
London:  44.207.783.4040, Option 4
Email: perfmgmt@enron.com

Thank you for your participation in this important process.

The following is a CUMULATIVE list of employee feedback requests with a
status of "OPEN."   Once you have submitted or declined an employee's request
for feedback, their name will no longer appear on this list.

Review Group: ENRON
Feedback Due Date: Nov 17, 2000

Employee Name                   Supervisor Name                 Date Selected
-------------                   ---------------                 -------------
CHRISTIANSEN, SUZANNE D         RANDALL L GAY                   Nov 01, 2000
FRANK, CAROLE C                 DARRON C GIRON                  Nov 01, 2000
GAY, RANDALL L                  ROBERT A SUPERTY                Nov 01, 2000
LUCCI, PAUL T                   MARK WHITT                      Nov 02, 2000
WOLFE, JASON                    DARRON C GIRON                  Nov 06, 2000


After my discussion with Cutty today, I think any discussion of the
organization should wait until we have a plan for the operations group based
upon our meeting tomorrow.  I plan to have the conceptual discussion with in
the staff meeting tomorrow had show the attached chart without the suggested
reporting shown on the chart.  My thoughts are that we need to focus on our
key business drivers and  develop the organization around these thoughts.  I
have listed the key business drivers as 1) Crude Oil Marketing and Trading,
2) Crude Oil Pipelines and 3) Cash Management due to our MLP format.

I have reflected the organization on the attached chart which is preliminary
and has not yet been shown to anyone other than via this memo.  The specifics
of the operational group has not been defined pending the outcome of
tomorrows discussion.  I have held discussions with those groups that are
spread across more than one  business and have ask them to define their
organization using the concept above.  All activities that do not directly
effect one of the three business drivers needs to be reviewed for importance
and priority.

I do have some concerns that must be addressed and still need some input.


No.  Have you talked to her?  I have been busy - my usual excuse.  I went to Scottsdale last weekend.  It was great!  What have you been up to?

K.

"PATRICIA TLAPEK" <tti@rcnchicago.com> on 04/17/2001 11:42:09 AM
To:	<Kim.Ward@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:	Re: Fw: Kids: Gotta love them!!

Now, thats cute!!!

Have you seen Susan Kennedy, lately?

When r u coming back to Chicago, the temps are beginning to rise...
Love, T.

----- Original Message -----
From: <Kim.Ward@enron.com>
To: <stephanie.miller@enron.com>; <Edith.Cross@enron.com>;
<Jana.Morse@enron.com>; <turktalk@aol.com>; <pugezmum@aol.com>;
<natalie.boehmer@eds.com>; <sjbtu@aol.com>; <wk@transcarriers.com>;
<Paul.Lucci@enron.com>; <Elliot.Mainzer@enron.com>;
<mnola1@worldnet.att.net>; <cathy_pocock@apsc.com>; <lisar@atoga.com>;
<Stewart.Rosman@enron.com>; <cindytarsi@aol.com>; <tti@rcnchicago.com>;
<Suzanne.Vann@enron.com>; <yonnie.waller@kraft.com>;
<Laura.Wente@enron.com>; <dhutchens@tucsonelectric.com>;
<wenderachels@aol.com>; <msueward@worldnet.att.net>
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 1:12 PM
Subject: Fwd: Fw: Kids: Gotta love them!!

----- Original Message -----
Subject: Kids: Gotta love them!!

Thought you might enjoy a little humor from some  children who know more
about relationships than some adults.

What do most people do on a date?

Dates are for having fun, and people should use them  to get to know each
other. Even boys have something to say if you listen  long enough.

--Lynette, age 8

On the first date, they just tell each other lies,  and that usually gets
them interested enough to go for a second date. --Martin,  age 10

What would you do if a date was not working  out?

I'd run home and play dead. --Craig, age

When is it okay to kiss someone?

When they're rich. --Pam,age 7

The law says you have to be eighteen, so I wouldn't  want to mess with
that.
--Curt, age

The rules goes like this: If you kiss someone,  then you should marry them
and have kids with them. It's the right thing  to do. --Howard, age 8

How would the world be different if people weren't  married?

There sure would be a lot of kids to explain,  wouldn't there? --Kelvin,
age 8

What is the right age to get married?

No age is good to get married at. You got to be  a fool to get married.
--Freddie, age 6

Is it better to be single or married?

It's better for girls to be single but not for  boys. Boys need someone to
clean up after them.
--Anita, age 9

I don't know which is better, but I'll tell you one  thing, I'm never going
to have sex with my wife. I don't want to be all  grossed out. --Theodore,
age 8

How do you decide who to marry?

You got to find somebody who likes the same  stuff. Like if you like
sports, she should like it that you like sports,  and she should keep the
chips and dip coming. --Alan, age 10

No person really decides before they grow up who  they're going to marry.
God decides it all way before, and you get to find out  later who you're
stuck with. --Kirsten, age 10

How can a stranger tell if two people are  married?

You might have to guess, based on whether they seem  to be yelling at the
same kids. --Derrick, age 8

What do your mom and dad have in  common?

Both don't want any more kids. --Lori, age

How would you make a marriage work?

Tell you wife that she looks pretty even if she looks  like a truck.
--Ricky, age 10


can you meet them for this- I have a conference call with Kelsey's lawyers at 5-6:30 today
then I have supper club at 7
thanks
kq

From:	Dutch Quigley/ENRON@enronXgate on 10/22/2001 12:28 PM
To:	Kay Quigley/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject:	couch

I set for the couch to be delivered tomorrow between 5:30 at 6:30

dq


The following is the schedule for Thursday's meeting with Imperial Capital.
Currently all meetings are scheduled in EB 2868.  We are trying to arrange a
different conference room and will let you know if we obtain one.

9:00 AM - Jim Fallon - Electricity
9:30 AM - Fred Lagrasta - Gas
10:00 AM - Lynda Clemmons and David Kistler - Weather
10:30 AM - Ed Ondarza - Pulp and Paper
11:00 AM - Stinson Gibner - Research
12 Noon - Lunch
1:00 PM - 5:00 PM - Discussion

Thanks in advance to all who will come to speak in the morning.


The first quarter of 2001 was a record quarter for the performance of the
businesses under the Enron Global Markets group.  We posted a gross margin
number of $100 million for the first quarter.  This represents a 38% increase
in gross margin after a very successful Q1 of 2000.  When combined with
outstanding results posted in December of 2000, EGM has contributed over $187
million to the Wholesale group in the last 4 months.  This was due to
tremendous contributions from each business group.

In order to keep the momentum going and to facilitate more growth, the
following changes and additions have been made within the organization.

Crude and Products group
Mid-marketing
Bill Berkeland has joined the group and is responsible for creating a focused
mid-marketing function specifically within this group.  Fred Lagrasta is
responsible for mid-marketing for Enron Americas and still maintains some
responsibility for various contacts and deal flow as well.  The purpose of
this group is to be very focused in the development of crude and product
specific products and services.  This group reports to Randy Maffett.

Origination
In order to manage the increased origination opportunities around the world,
the Origination group has been changed in order to insure that the proper
focus is placed on these opportunities and to manage its wide scope.  Doug
Friedman will lead our NGL and Petchem origination efforts reporting to John
Nowlan.  Joining Doug will be Rick Cantrell recently hired from Union
Carbide.  The global crude and products origination group has added Randy O,
Conner from Red Meteor, who has extensive experience in these markets.  Both
Randy and Doug Leach,s growing fuels origination group will report to Randy
Maffett.

Trading
Lee Jackson will assume the role of U.S. NGL,s lead financial trader,
supported by Chad South.  The petchem and plastic trading businesses have
been reorganized under Stuart Bland.  Alan Engberg will be responsible for
plastics trading in the Americas.

Shipping
Scott Moncrieff will assume responsibility of our global shipping network
related to crude and products.  Scott will be charged with expanding all
aspects of the shipping portfolio taking advantage of our growing presence in
these markets and the successes we have had marketing shipping on line.

Weather
The weather group under Mark Tawney,s direction is expanding its efforts
around the world.  Europe will have an expanded focus and the London office
will focus on new opportunities in Europe.  Paul Murray has joined Enron from
Castlebridge Partners and will be moving to London to develop and expand the
continental opportunities.  Ross McIntyre, currently based in London, will
report to Paul.  Bill Windle has joined the weather group and has
responsibility for origination activities for North America.  Bill,s most
recent assignment has been in the EBS organization.  The Oslo weather office
managed by Thor Lien will have responsibility for Scandinavia weather
activities.  In addition, employees are being added in the Australia and
Japan regions.  We are now making markets in 32 cities around the world on
EnronOnline.

Coal
Mark Schroeder has joined the coal group and is responsible for origination
activities with generators in the U.S.  Mark,s most recent assignment was as
the head of all regulatory activities for Enron Europe, Japan and Australia.

Enron Japan
The momentum of power deregulation process has slowed in Japan.  The decision
has been made to scale back the wholesale power activities.   Joe Hirl,
President and CEO of Enron Japan, will now report into the EGM organization.
Joe will maintain his direct responsibility of the office and will be
increasing his focus on the business lines within EGM.  All of these products
have high growth potential in both the near and long-term and he will
coordinate and help implement with all the business lines and their
activities.

LNG
LNG continues to expand with the vision to increase the number of
transactions and create a portfolio of assets and contractual access around
the world.  Jonathan Whitehead has joined the LNG group and has
responsibility for all trading and shipping activities.

Neal Gerstandt, previously an independent energy consultant,  Jared Kaiser,
from Enron Americas - East Gas Desk, and Kurt Lindahl, from Enron Global
Assets, have also joined the LNG group with responsibilities in the area of
origination in the Western Region.

Enron Freight Markets
EFM has concluded over 2,000 transactions in its first two months.  Chris
Kravas continues to focus on building the spot trading and mid-market
capabilities that will enable it to be the dominant player in its market, and
has hired four new traders in the last two weeks.  Kellie Metcalf, from EBS,
has joined Shawn Cumberland's origination effort, and Deirdre McCaffrey, from
Gas Structuring and Mid-Market, has joined Matt Arnold's forward trading
group focusing on diesel products.

Global Risk Markets
David Hoog joined Enron from Ace Insurance in December 2000 and has quickly
built a team of people specialized in trading unit contingent power price
call options, a hybrid insurance derivative product. Drawing on Ace and Enron
resources, this team is based in New York and includes Alex Tartakovski and
Larry Marcus from Ace, as well as Joana Bekerman and Tony Chang who recently
moved to New York from Houston. Their first transaction closed just 3 months
after startup.

Brad Blesie will be moving to London in June to establish a base of operation
for GRM and expand our insurance derivative activities into the European
market place. Among the opportunities he is currently exploring are
contingent call options applied to shipping and charter rates, trading
insolvent insurance claims, and combining North Sea oil and gas VPP risk with
decommissioning insurance.

In April this year, EGM established a hedge fund origination effort in New
York reporting to Per Sekse and led by Russell Dyk who recently moved to New
York from LNG in Houston. Russell is responsible for expanding our commodity
trading relationship with hedge funds to include crude oil, products, liquids
and other commodities traded by EGM. Joining Russell in this effort is
Stephen Plauche, who comes to us from Enron Americas, power trading desk.

Financial Trading
Elsa Piekielniak has assumed responsibility for Enron,s developing
agriculture business.  Billy Lemmons has changed groups and now runs the
Analyst and Associate program for Enron Corp.

Please congratulate everyone on their new assignment and we look forward to
the continued growth in all the EGM businesses.


heffner a little bullish, eh?


I will be off on Friday. Thanks for the invite.
PL


Here is the file.  While there are some quotes, remember that the analytics were never taken to the final decimal.  We were mainly trying to make a political point.

Jim


Sara,

We need to draft an ISDA for Empire Paper Group, LLC.  We would like to
insert language that will allow Enron to get a second lien on the assets
after the primary lender instead of using the CSA.  Cross default thresholds
are $1MM and $100MM, respectively for Empire and Enron.

Please send the draft to credit first and we will check the new language.
The underwriters are Jay Epstein and Chris Croon.

If you have any questions please feel free to call.

Thanks,

Jane Wilhite
ext. 35063


1:30 is good. I will call you.

	SHoward@milbank.com
	05/11/2000 05:29 PM

		 To: Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: NSM

How about 1:30 p.m. your time, or any time after that?

The Baltimore meeting won't happen, but there is some background.? That's one
of the things we want to talk about.

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com [mailto:Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2000 3:23 PM
To: SHoward@milbank.com
Subject: Re: NSM

I am around all day tomorrow. Please leave me a voicemail re when you want
to talk. Also-- any luck on my proposed meeting w/the Legg Mason?

This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee
or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify
the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer.


Errol,
Here you go.  It will need to be signed by Jeff and Sally Beck, then returned
to me.
If you have any questions, let me know.
Thanks,
Brian


<<...>>

The New Democrat Network invites
its members to join us for a

CONFERENCE CALL DISCUSSION OF HOMELAND SECURITY

featuring

THE HONORABLE ASHTON B. CARTER
A leading expert on homeland defense who will give us a better
understanding of the challenges ahead in protecting against
future terrorist attacks

Current Advisor to the U.S. Department of Defense and former
Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security
Policy under President Clinton

Professor at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government and
Co-Director of the Harvard-Stanford Preventative Defense
Project which focuses on emerging threats to the United States
such as nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons

Author of Preventative Defense: A New Security Strategy for
America (with former Defense Secretary William J. Perry) which
former National Security Advisor Gen. Brent Scowcroft called
"An essential guide to the critical choices that must be made
as America rethinks potential threats to national security."

MONDAY, OCTOBER 29th, 2001
11:30 AM - 12:00 NOON EST
Call in time: 11:20 AM

Presentation to be followed by question and answer period

INVITATION ONLY - SPACES ARE LIMITED

To register for this call, email Stephanie Dorko by 5:00 pm
Thursday Oct. 25th
at sdorko@newdem.org  and say you would like to participate.
She will respond with the conference call phone number and code.

Find out more about what New Democrats in Congress and around
the nation are doing to address terrorism -- sign up for NDN
News at www.newdem.org/ndnnews or visit www.newdem.org

Contributions to the New Democrat Network are not tax deductible.
Paid for by the New Democrat Network.