FYI:  The following is the Unify to Sitara Bridge back schedule from the Sitara Team.  Unify can still send the files to Sitara but Sitara will not process during the "No bridge back" times listed.  This list is in response to several inquiries to me regarding slow bridge-back times to Sitara.    Hours are listed in 24hr  format central time.

1. Monday - Friday	14:00  - 19:49 hrs	Single Thread
2. Monday - Friday	19:50 - 24:00hrs		Multi Thread
3. Monday - Friday	00:01 - 13:59 hrs	No bridge back

4 . Sat - Sunday		12:50 - 24:00hrs	 	MultiThread
5.  Sat - Sunday	00:01 - 12:49 hrs	No bridge back


All,

Please note that the message below is related ONLY to the new enhancements which have been added to the TAGG Deal Capture screen.  The new version of TAGG Deal Capture application with the two new enhancements mentioned in the e-mail below will be migrated to production on the night of July 9, 2001.

	On a separate note, the TAGG/ERMS database is scheduled to migrate to Oracle 8i on July 14, 2001.  Please continue to test your production code on egsdevel, 	and please test all your Excel and Access files, and make sure that you're using the Oracle 8i driver for ODBC.

Thanks & regards,

Karima Husain
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gupta, Sanjeev
Sent:	Friday, July 06, 2001 12:54 PM
To:	Guggenheim, Victor; Baumbach, David; Bowen, Bob; Brogan, Theresa T.; Brown, Matt A.; Chew, Carol; Cross, Richard; Dawes, Cheryl; Denny, Jennifer; Fondren, Mark; Gillis, Brian; Giron, Darron C.; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; Groves, Eric; Hanson, Kristen J.; Hernandez, Nancy; Keiser, Kam; Love, Phillip M.; Mao, Shari; McIntyre, Burton; Moorer, Torrey; Nicoll, Kenny; Prejean, Frank; Reeves, Kathy; Stevens, Martha; Swinney, John; Tan, Gladys; Taylor, Dimitri; Torres, Carlos; Wlodarski, Patryk; McLaughlin Jr., Errol; Sharma, Shifali
Cc:	Lim, Francis S.; Husain, Karima; Dang, Ricky; Dunsmore, Ken; Fortney, Bill; Greig, Iain; Hsieh, Alex; Krishnaswamy, Jayant; Lari, Bryan; Ma, Felicia; Ngo, Toan; Nolte, Ron; Swaim, Michael; Rivera, Oscar; Wong, Jeremy
Subject:	Migration Rescheduled for TAGG Deal Capture Screen

The new version of TAGG Deal Capture Application was  planned to be migrated to production on July 6, 2001 is rescheduled.  It will be migrated to production on Monday night July 9, 2001

Please let me know if you have any questions

Thanks
Sanjeeev

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gupta, Sanjeev
Sent:	Monday, July 02, 2001 5:18 PM
To:	Baumbach, David; Bowen, Bob; Brogan, Theresa T.; Brown, Matt A.; Chew, Carol; Cross, Richard; Dawes, Cheryl; Denny, Jennifer; Fondren, Mark; Gillis, Brian; Giron, Darron C.; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; Groves, Eric; Hanson, Kristen J.; Hernandez, Nancy; Keiser, Kam; Love, Phillip M.; Mao, Shari; McIntyre, Burton; Moorer, Torrey; Nicoll, Kenny; Prejean, Frank; Reeves, Kathy; Stevens, Martha; Swinney, John; Tan, Gladys; Taylor, Dimitri; Torres, Carlos; Wlodarski, Patryk; McLaughlin Jr., Errol; Sharma, Shifali
Cc:	Lim, Francis S.; Husain, Karima; Dang, Ricky; Dunsmore, Ken; Fortney, Bill; Greig, Iain; Hsieh, Alex; Krishnaswamy, Jayant; Lari, Bryan; Ma, Felicia; Ngo, Toan; Nolte, Ron; Swaim, Michael; Rivera, Oscar
Subject:	Changes in TAGG Deal Capture Screen
Importance:	High

We have a new version of TAGG Deal Capture Application under TAGG-Stage. Following enhancements made in this version.

1. A new flag has been added in the deal capture screen that will allow a particular deal record to be identified as a component of a multi-legged deal.
?	Requested by : TAGG Deal Clearing ( Ron Nolte x 3-7569 )
?	Reason : TAGG Deal Clearing has a process that sends confirmation related information to Commodity Logic. However, there are some TAGG deals that are made up of different legs. In these cases Commodity Logic does not want to get any of the legs associated with multi-leg deals. Please note that creating more than one leg for a deal does not mean that it is a multi legged deal.

2. Allow entry of negative price values  in fixed price column of Deal Capture Application for Swaps/Forward/Options only.

?	Requested by : Victor Guggenheim
?	Reason : Negative Price Curve for Freight has been loaded into the system without any problem, but user interface(TAGG Deal Capture) does not accept negative values.

The new version is planned to be migrated to production for July 6 or 7, 2001

If you encounter any problems, please let me know.

Thunderball, EOL bridge and TAGG Server, and TDS system support personnel, please verify if you are okay with change #1. If you have any questions, you can contact me (x5-3816) or Oscar (X5-3361)

Regards,
Sanjeev
X5-3816


thanks kate!  sorry about that, i didn't pull each one up -i just assumed
that they were all like the 1st two that i did check on.  thanks for your
help!

   Kate Symes @ ECT                04/02/2001 12:17 PM

To: Kimberly Hundl/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sharen Cason/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amy
Smith/ENRON@enronXgate
cc: Lester Rawson/PDX/ECT@ECT

Subject: Unit Contingent Deals

I spoke with Les about these deals, and he told me he'd like unit contingent
SALES confirmed, and unit contingent BUYS not confirmed. I sorted through
these deal numbers and changed the buys to not be confirmed, and it looks
like most of the sales already have the unit name in the comments section.
Following is the list of deals you sent me and notes on what I did:

562211 - changed to "no confirm"
564613 - changed to "no confirm"
566060 - unit name is in comments section
566062 - unit name is in comments section
566069 - unit name is in comments section
566071 - unit name is in comments section
566077 - unit is Willamette Albany Paper Mill/comments section is full - ???
566078 - unit name is in comments section
556116 - unit is LV Cogen/added to comments
554737 - unit is LV Cogen/added to comments

Les and I also talked about creating a master list of delivery points and
their respective unit names for future reference. Please let me know if you
think that would be helpful. In the meantime, feel free to send these lists
to me.

Thanks,
Kate

Kimberly Hundl@ENRON
04/02/2001 07:29 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Sharen Cason/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amy Smith/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject: More Unit Contingent Deals

Hi Kate,
The following are also unit contingent deals that we aren't able to confirm
unless we have a unit name.
562211
564613
566060
566062
566069
566071
566077
566078
Thanks!
Kim
---------------------- Forwarded by Kimberly Hundl/Corp/Enron on 04/02/2001
09:26 AM ---------------------------

Kimberly Hundl
04/02/2001 09:11 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Sharen Cason/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amy Smith/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject: Unit Contingent Deals #554737 & 556116

Hi Kate!
Hope you had a good weekend!
We need to know the unit name on these two unit contingent deals for Salt
River Project.
Thanks!
Kim


Dale,

Sorry for a delay in responding to your message.
I shall talk to the head of our B2B unit on Friday this week and
shall remind him about your visit.

I hope he can make a decision at this time whether he is interested
in pursuing this opportunity

Vince

"Dale Nesbitt" <dale.nesbitt@marketpointinc.com> on 06/27/2000 11:26:05 PM
To: "Vincent Kaminski" <vkamins@enron.com>, "Vince. J. Kaminski"
<Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Impending Visit

Vince:

I sent you an email a couple of days ago to inquire if we might get together
at your offices on July 5 or July 7 in Houston to follow up our earlier
discussions.  I notice I have two email addresses for you, so I am sending
this to both.  I am not sure the earlier transmission got to you.

Would you be available the afternoon of the 5th or the morning of the 7th to
continue our earlier discussions?  Give me an email or phone shout at
650.218.3069.

Thanks

Dale Nesbitt


FYI
Received: from AUMTA02.au.abnamro.com ([203.42.47.161]) by
tfsgateway.andrews-kurth.com; Wed, 27 Sep 2000 19:56:42 -0500
Received: by AUMTA02.au.abnamro.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.3 (778.2 1-4-1999))
id CA256968.00049BBB ; Thu, 28 Sep 2000 11:50:20 +1100
X-Lotus-FromDomain: ABNAMRO
From: anne.mcleod@au.abnamro.com
To: PeteJ@andrews-kurth.com
Message-ID: <CA256968.000498AA.00@AUMTA02.au.abnamro.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 11:49:25 +1100
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Futures Client Agreement - Enron North America Corp.
and ABNAMRO
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/mixed;
Boundary="0__=fQh4hcZSGnjxQ4y33DQs3ULhOX9t2pYAi6w1wBCburHyMptroYxPFgp0"
Content-Disposition: inline

Jason,

Is there any update as to when we can expect to recieve the executed
documents?

Anne
---------------------- Forwarded by Anne McLeod/AU/ABNAMRO/NL on 28/09/2000
11:52 ---------------------------

(Embedded image moved to file: pic03066.pcx)
Anne McLeod
(Embedded image moved to file: pic25142.pcx)
29/08/2000 14:46

To:   "JASON PETERS" <PETEJ@andrews-kurth.com>
cc:
Subject:  Re: Fwd: Re: Futures Client Agreement - Enron North America Corp.
and
      ABNAMRO  (Document link not converted)

Jason,

When can we expect to receive the executed documents?

Regards,

Anne

"JASON PETERS" <PETEJ@andrews-kurth.com> on 16/08/2000 23:42:24

To:   Anne McLeod/AU/ABNAMRO/NL
cc:
Subject:  Fwd: Re: Futures Client Agreement - Enron North America Corp.
and
      ABNAMRO

Anne,

We received the execution copies.  We are in the process of getting
signatures.

Thanks,

Jason Peters

Received: from postmaster.enron.com      (outbound5.enron.com [192.152.140.9])
by tfsgateway.andrews-kurth.com; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 07:58:28 -0500
Received: from mailman.enron.com (mailman.enron.com [192.168.189.66])  by
postmaster.enron.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/postmaster-1.00) with ESMTP id HAA11952
for
<jpeters@andrews-kurth.com>; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 07:55:07 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from dserv1.ect.enron.com (dserv1.ect.enron.com [172.16.1.37])    by
mailman.enron.com (8.10.1/8.10.1/corp-1.05) with ESMTP id e7GCt7H17053
for
<jpeters@andrews-kurth.com>; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 07:55:07 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from notes.ect.enron.com (ecthou_gt2.corp.enron.com [172.16.4.33])
by dserv1.ect.enron.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id HAA13373  for
<jpeters@andrews-kurth.com>; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 07:55:07 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by notes.ect.enron.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.5  (863.2 5-20-1999))  id
8625693D.0046F96A ; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 07:55:13 -0500
X-Lotus-FromDomain: ECT
From: "Brenda Whitehead" <Brenda.Whitehead@enron.com>
To: jpeters@andrews-kurth.com
Message-ID: <8625693D.0046F8A8.00@notes.ect.enron.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2000 07:55:07 -0500
Subject: Re: Futures Client Agreement - Enron North America Corp. and ABN
AMRO
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

----- Forwarded by Brenda Whitehead/HOU/ECT on 08/16/2000 07:54 AM -----
|--------+-------------------------->
|        |          Anne.McLeod@au.a|
|        |          bnamro.com      |
|        |                          |
|        |          08/08/2000 08:28|
|        |          PM              |
|        |                          |
|--------+-------------------------->

>----------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                            |
  |       To:
Jason.Peters@enron.com                                       |
  |
cc:                                                                  |
  |       Subject:     Re: Futures Client Agreement - Enron North America
Corp.|
  |       and ABN
AMRO                                                         |

>----------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Jason,

Did you receive the execution copies of the futures document?

Anne

Jason.Peters@enron.com on 01/08/2000 02:01:55

To:   Anne McLeod/AU/ABNAMRO/NL
cc:
Subject:  Re: Futures Client Agreement - Enron North America Corp. and ABN
AMRO

Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith
Houston, Texas, USA
Attn:  Sara Shackleton

                    Anne.McLeod@au.a
                    bnamro.com              To:     Jason.Peters@enron.com
                                            cc:
                    07/30/2000 11:22        Subject:     Re: Futures Client
Agreement - Enron
                    PM                      North America Corp. and ABN AMRO

Jason,

Th execution copies of the futures agreement have been prepared.  Please
advise
me of your full address details so that we can courier the documents to
you.

Regards,

Anne

______________________________________________________________________________
_______________
*****Important Information*****
This document should be read only by those persons to whom it is addressed and
its content is not intended for use by any other persons.  If you have
received
this message in error, please notify us immediately.  Please also destroy and
delete the message from your computer.  Any unauthorised form of reproduction
of
this message is strictly prohibited.  ABN AMRO does not guarantee the security
of any information electronically transmitted.  ABN AMRO is not liable for the
proper and complete transmission of the information contained in this
communication, nor for any delay in its receipt.  THE USE OF EMAIL FOR ANY
ILLEGAL PURPOSE OR FOR ANY PURPOSE OTHER THAN AS PERMITTED BY ABN AMRO IS
STRICTLY PROHIBITED AND SUCH USE MAY RESULT IN LEGAL ACTION.

 - pic03066.pcx
 - pic25142.pcx


Kelly,

I spoke with my friend and he mentioned that Michael was already talking to 2
firms and he
didn't want to recommend a third at this time.  I told him that if anything
changes, let me know.
It was worth a try anyway.  I'll talk to you soon.

Kevin


Stephanie,

We are breaking up our Central Midcon region into two books beginning July
1.  To facilitate this, Sitara has set up two new internal books:  ENA-IM Mid
Central South & ENA-IM Mid Central North.  It would be helpful if we could
have any physical June EOL deals continue to be booked to ENA-IM Central but
all physical July-out deals booked to the new books.  The two traders
involved are Kelli Stevens and Ed Smith.

 Kelli Stevens ENA-IM Mid Central South
 Ed Smith ENA-IM Mid Central North

Please let me know if there is anything else I need to do to expedite this
request.  Thanks for your help.

DG    3-9573


-----Original Message-----
From: Rodriquez, Andy
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 4:46 PM
To: Black, Tamara Jae; '/o=ENRON/ou=NA/cn=Recipients/cn=notesaddr/cn=a478079f-55e1f3b0-862566fa-612229'; Abler, William; Aggarwal, Anubhav; Allen, Diana; Arora, Harry; Bailey, Debra; Ballato, Russell; Ballinger, Ted; Baughman Jr., Don; Benchluch, Moises; Benjelloun, Hicham; Benson, Robert; Bentley, Corry; Blaine, Jay; Bolt, Laurel; Broderick, Paul J.; Broussard, Richard; Burnett, Lisa; Campbell, Larry F.; Capasso, Joe; Carson, Mike; Chen, Alan; Choate, Jason; Cline, Kevin; Collins, Dustin; Comeaux, Keith; Coulter, Kayne; Davis, Mark Dana; Day, Smith L.; Dean, Clint; Decook, Todd; Emesih, Gerald; Errigo, Joe; Forney, John M.; Freije, William; Garcia, Miguel L.; Gilbert, Gerald; Gilbert-smith, Doug; Giron, Gustavo; Greer, Andrew; Gualy, Jaime; Guerra, Claudia; Gulmeden, Utku; Gupta, Gautam; Ha, Amie; Hanse, Patrick; Hernandez, Juan; Imai, Rika; Ingram, David; Jenkins IV, Daniel; Kaniss, Jason; King, Jeff; Kinser, John; Larkworthy, Carrie; Laurent, Dean; Laverell, Justin; Lenartowicz, Chris; Lorenz, Matt; Lotz, Gretchen; Lowell, Thomas; Mack, Iris; Mahajan, Ashish; Makkai, Peter; Marquez, Mauricio; Maskell, David; May, Tom; McElreath, Alexander; Miller, Jeffrey; Oh, Seung-Taek; Olinde Jr., Steve; Pace, Andy; Padron, Juan; Pan, Steve; Philip, Willis; Podurgiel, Laura; Poppa, John D.; Presto, Kevin M.; Quenet, Joe; Rawal, Punit; Rogers, Benjamin; Rust, Bill; Ryan, David; Saibi, Eric; Schiavone, Paul; Schneider, Bryce; Seely, Michael; Serio, Erik; Shoemake, Lisa; Simpson, Erik; Stalford, Robert; Stepenovitch, Joe; Sturm, Fletcher J.; Symms, Mark; Tamma, Ramanarao; Thomas, Paul D.; Trejo, Reese; Valdes, Maria; Vernon, Clayton; Wang, Steve; Williams, Ryan; Willis, Cory; Zipperer, Mike; Baughman, Edward D.; Clynes, Terri; Dalton III, Oscar; Kelly, Mike E.; Sewell, Doug; Valderrama, Larry; Walton, Steve; Roan, Michael; Perrino, Dave; Maurer, Luiz; Hueter, Barbara A.; Landwehr, Susan M.; Hoatson, Tom; Novosel, Sarah; Nicolay, Christi L.; Yeung, Charles
Subject: RE: RTO Week -- Summary of Standards and Practices Panel

RTO Week

 <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />

Day 4 - October 18, 2001

Afternoon Session

Standardizing Markets, Business, and Other Practices

Panelists for this discussion were:  Sarah Barpoulis, PG&E National Energy Group; William P. Boswell, GISB; Bill Burkes (substituting for David J. Christiano), City Utilities of Springfield, Missouri; David N. Cook, NERC General Counsel; Michael Kormos PJM Interconnection; LeRoy Koppendrayer, Minnesota Public Utilities Commission; and Marty Mennes, Florida Power & Light Company.

General Observations

The Commissioners were all present the majority of the time (Massey left late in the  afternoon).  FERC Staff was active in the discussion; however, the commissioners were very active as well, asking perhaps as much as 70% of all questions.  There was a general consensus that standards were needed; much discussion focused simply on how much and by who. The Commission seemed very interested in leaning what they needed to do to move the industry forward and how far they needed to go.  Panelists urged the need to mover forward as quickly as possible, but both they and FERC seemed to recognize that some of the issues regarding standardized market design and such needed to be addressed before RTOs could really begin to move forward.  There was discussion on identifying which industry group (NERC or GISB) would take the reins in the future.  On an interesting tangential note, there was noticeable conflict between NERC and GISB, with veiled insults between the two organizations somewhat common during the discussions.

FERC Deliverables

A great deal of the discussions focused on identifying what the industry needed from the Commission.  Staffers probed all panelists to find what they felt was critical.

The first major topic was "How many RTOs?  What is their scope?"  All panelists seemed to agree that this question needed to be answered immediately by FERC, in strong definitive language.  N o one offered any specific language, but seemed to be urging FERC to issue a formal statement.

The next topic was, "What will be standard market design?"  Panelists varied on this, but most felt strong guidance from FERC is urgent.  Some urged for one mandatory design for North America, one supported a set of rigid standard designs, one supported a single design with requests for exceptions (followed by an in-depth review process), and one seemed to prefer the current situation.

The commission in general seemed to be very interested in understanding what the industry needed to move forward.  They continually visited this topic throughout their discussions, asking questions like, "Do we need to issue a Mega-Order that addresses all these issues?" and, "How much detail do you need us to provide?"   General feel from the panelsists seemed to be they wanted strong leadership in this areas.  Kormos and Burkes went so far as to say FERC should "Mandate as much as they felt comfortable - and then go a little further."  Others seemed to be a little worried about this idea, but in general did not oppose the concept, citing only general warnings and the need for cautious investigation.

One item of interest: Wood referred to the filing made by the Electronic Scheduling Collaborative and specifically asked if the items identified in the "RTO Design and RTO Implementation" section would address many of the questions and uncertainty facing the industry with regard to RTO design.  Kormos indicated that clear and specific answers to these questions specifying a course of action would go a long way toward guiding the industry.  The section to which Wood referred was one that I wrote, and asked the following questions:

?         Congestion Management - When Operational Security Violations occur, how is the system to be stabilized in a fair and equitable manner that is nonetheless efficient?  Will LMP based systems be standard, or will there be others that must be accommodated?

?         Transmission Service  - Are transmission services required to schedule ("covered" schedules only), or are they risk management tools protecting from congestion charges (both "covered" and "uncovered" schedules are allowed)?

?         Loop Flows  - Are contract-path based or flow-based transmission services appropriate?  If contract-path based, how are parallel path issues to be addressed?

?         Grandfathered Transmission Service - Should contracts existing prior to RTO development be transferred, or is there an equitable way to retire those contracts?  Are there other solutions?

?         Energy Imbalance Markets - How are imbalance markets to function? Will they serve as real-time energy markets (support unbalanced schedules), be limited to supplying needs of imbalance service (require balanced schedules), or will they be required at all?

?         Ancillary Services - Will ancillary service markets be developed in standard ways?  Will entities be required to actually schedule ancillary services (required to schedule), or will they be treated primarily as financial instruments (protecting against real-time POLR charges)?

?         Losses - Can we utilize the imbalance markets to support losses?  Can we create specific loss standards that facilitate the scheduling process, or must we support methods that are currently in tariffs, but technically unwieldy?

?         Non-Jurisdictionals - How are non-jurisdictionals to be integrated into the new world?  Should systems be designed with the assumption that non-jurisdictional will be part of an RTO?  Or should they be designed to treat each NJE as a separate entity?

Hopefully, FERC will use this section as a template to answer these critical questions in an assertive manner, and give some solid direction in which to move. Kormos emphasized the need for concrete answers to these questions, pointing out that vague answers (i.e., "do congestion management") will take a year or two to resolve, but specific answers (i.e., "LMP with financial hedging instruments") will take only months.  The Commission asked Mike about moving forward, and he told them that effectively, it was impossible to move forward with implementation without getting these issues addressed.

Now for a  funny point - One of the commissioners (I think Breathitt) referred to some concerns expressed in the Northwest that their high concentration of hydro power makes LMP inefficient for the Northwest.  Kormos flat out said, "My profession is understanding how power systems work, and I don't believe that that statement is true."  He then backpedaled a bit and said that it would need more study, but he stood by his statement that the assertion by the Northwest interests was false.

NERC and GISB

A great deal of discussion focused around the need for a single standard-setting organization.  Massey went so far as to ask, "Are we looking at a beauty contest between NERC and GISB?"  Cook and Boswell then went into several short polite jabs at each other's organizations.  Other participants continually reiterated the need for ONE, INDEPENDENT organization.  Interestingly, Boswell was very emphatic about the established trust and respect in GISB, while Cook preferred to only talk about the "new" structure of NERC and did not focus on its history.

Brownell offered some not-too-subtle passive support of GISB by pointedly asking both Cook and Boswell if they lobbied political positions (i.e., were they not only an organization but also a stakeholder?).  GISB was easily able to say they were not, but NERC of course had to admit to their romancing of Congress and the Bush administration for reliability legislation. Point, Brownell.

Mennes acted as somewhat of a supporter for NERC, playing Dave Cook's yes-man.  He probably did them a little bit of harm by pointing to NERC's supposed "successes," such as TLR and E-Tag.  If staffers have tenure, they will likely remember that these "successes" have not been so successful, resulting in several filings and interventions.  We may also wish to file comments in specific objection to these claims, to refresh their memory and to show the pretty picture Marty painted was in fact a fiction.

There was a little discussion about splitting reliability and market issues, but general consensus was that I could not be done.  There was also some talk of folding NERC under GISB/EISB.

The arguments began winding down after a some time, and Boswell strongly urged the Commission to speak to industry executives and advocacy group leadership to see whether NERC or GISB should lead the industry forward.  NERC somewhat less enthusiastically supported this position.  In general, I would say it was a close fight but GISB came out more on top.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Andy Rodriquez
Regulatory Affairs - Enron Corp.
andy.rodriquez@enron.com
713-345-3771


Sara,

Please review the following collar transaction.  (Special notice of the
premium payment added.)

Any comments

Fax of deal ticket to follow....

Bernice


Daren - there is flow on meter 1386 for 1/4/01.  Deal 150325 expired on day
3.  Could you please extend this deal or create a new one?  Thanks.

AL


My condolences on the loss of your grandfather.  Please let us know if there
is anything we can do.

Stan


Steve,

I assume it's 9:00 a.m.  my time, Monday.
It works for me.

 I haven't responded in time to the
your message re Thursday. I had a few back
to back meetings in the morning and I read your message quite late
into the day.

Vince

Steven Leppard
11/10/2000 04:25 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tani Nath/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Vince, Tani

FYI.

Steve
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven Leppard/LON/ECT on 10/11/2000
10:27 ---------------------------

	Calendar Entry

Research Meeting w/-Michael, John, Tani, Richard, Joe, Steve & Vince Kaminski
Brief description:
Date:
Time:

13/11/2000
15:00 - 15:45

Detailed description:

 Invitations

		Phone/Ext	Include
Chairperson:	John Sherriff/LON/ECT	37359	  Yes
Organised by:	Lauren Urquhart/LON/ECT		  No

Invitations sent to:	Tracie McCormack
Kirsten Nelz
Steven Leppard

This meeting repeats   starting on    (if the date occurs on a weekend the
meeting ).


This looks great!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rapp, Bill
Sent:	Thursday, November 29, 2001 2:48 PM
To:	Watson, Kimberly; Lokay, Michelle; Lindberg, Lorraine; Lohman, TK; McConnell, Mark; Blair, Lynn
Cc:	Porter, J. Gregory; Fossum, Drew; Pryor, Tony
Subject:	OBA Letter

	Attached for your review and comments is a first draft of the letter that Kim requested to the operators that have not yet executed new OBAs.


Subject: FW: Aggies Demand a Recount

College Station, TX (AP) - R.C. Slocum and the Texas A&M Aggies are
demanding a recount of the game in which Oklahoma won 35 to 31. "The end
zones were confusing," says Slocum. "I'm sure that some of the touchdowns
that went in Oklahoma's end zone were meant to go into ours.

We were scoring in those end zones also.  Oklahoma would never have scored
thirty-five points. There's no way we lost this one. A&M demands a recount."

Oklahoma officials are calling this "outrageous". "They agreed to the size,
shape and locations of the end zones prior to kick-off," replies OU coach
Bob Stoops.  "If they had a problem with them, they should have said so
before we started. You don't get to keep playing until you're happy with the
outcome.  Someone had to lose.  We've scored over thirty-five points many
times."

A&M has sent lawyers, farmers, and those guys in the funny boots as well as
that damn dog down to Kyle Field, where the scoreboard will be tested.  "We
are confident that when the points are re-totaled, we will be the winner of
the game," says Slocum.

OU also points out that in many games prior to this one, the same end zones
were used. "They didn't have a problem with the end zones until they lost,"
says Stoops.

Outside of Kyle Field, A&M student protesters have gathered outside bearing
signs such as, "A&M wants a fair game! WHOOOOOOP!" Students' thoughts echoed
their signs. "All we want is a fair total of the points before we declare a
winner," says student Karen Hays, an aggie from Marfa.

"We need to proceed cautiously and not rush to judgment before we declare a
winner."

ABC, around 2:00pm central time, had mistakenly declared A&M the winner,
despite the slim 3 point lead the Aggies held at that point. At about 2:30
pm, with the game still to close to call, ABC had to back off its
prediction.

College football analyst Brent Musburger made the call. "We felt that with a
number of points still not added in by Jamaar Tombs and the Aggies, we were
certain A&M would carry this game. We may have been premature in our
prediction."


Never

	Enron Capital Management  From:  David Baumbach                           04/11/2001 09:18 AM

To:	Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Don't forget about me!

Dave


Start Date: 1/4/02; HourAhead hour: 16;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002010416.txt


Let's make sure she gets an offer.  Thanks.  Jeff

Vince J Kaminski
01/23/2001 01:23 PM
To: Kristin Gandy/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: FW: Wharton Resume Submission - Summer Intern

Kristin.

Kim is a member of the Tiger Team. She is interested in a summer
internship with Enron and I shall be glad to take her.

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/23/2001
01:24 PM ---------------------------

"Kim Whitsel" <Kimberly.Whitsel.wg02@wharton.upenn.edu> on 01/22/2001
12:07:35 AM
To: <Christie.Patrick@enron.com>, <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: Wharton Resume Submission

-----Original Message-----
From: Kim Whitsel [mailto:Kimberly.Whitsel.wg02@wharton.upenn.edu]
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 6:51 PM
To: kristin.gandy@enron.com
Subject: Wharton Resume Submission

Summer Position under Wharton Schedule #1823
 - Kim Whitsel -Enron Cover Letter.doc
 - Kim Whitsel- Wharton2 resume.doc


I know nothing!

Marie Heard
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron Broadband Services
Phone:  (713) 853-3907
Fax:  (713) 646-8537
Marie_Heard@Enron.net

	Tana Jones@ECT
	07/13/00 04:26 PM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy E
Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT,
David Portz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Marie Heard/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Robbi Rossi/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: Allegheny Energy

One of the online team is looking for someone from Legal who is working with
(read "holding up things with") the Allegheny Energy people right now.  Any
of you got anything going on?


Ben,

I think we need to start to build model, rather than waiting for Structuring.
Once we build template, we can finish model just by dropping curves from
Structuring. Could you adjust our existing LM 6000 model to reflect our
valuation method as follow;

Valuation of Retail Short =
+ Revenue from serving load (to get 12% IRR)
+  Expense from serving load at the market
+ Spread option value for full capacity (190MW)
+ ICAP ($1.00/kw-mo for 6 months)
- Fixed expenses

Please let me know if this is too much on your plate. Thanks.

Jinsung


Are you serving ribs?

Tim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hook, Connie
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 2:31 PM
To:	Aschwege, Doug; Johnson, Robert L.; Sans Souci, Becki; Barker, Courtney; Barry, Mike; Berg, Vicki; Bolks, Sean; Bollinger, Joni; Bowers, Janet; Branney, Theresa; Brennan, Lorna; Burleson, Bob; Cabrera, Reyna; Cohrs, Allen; Donoho, Lindy; Dushinske, John; Fiscus, John; Fowler, Bill; Gadd, Eric; Gilbert, Steve; Halpin, Tom; Harris, Steven; Herber, Stephen; Hyatt, Kevin; Johanson, Tim; Jones, Dana; Joyce, Jane; Korbelik, Stephanie; Lagerstrom, Karen; Lantefield, Laura; Lindberg, Lorraine; Lohman, TK; Lokay, Michelle; McCarran, Penny; McGowan, Mike W.; Mercaldo, Vernon; Millar, John; Miller, Kent; Moore, Jan; Neubauer, Dave; Neville, Sue; Oldenhuis, Frank; Paladino, Ranelle; Pavlou, Larry; Penkava, Loren; Powell, Don; Powers, Ken; Pritchard, John; Riehm, Richard; Roobaert, Preston; Sebesta, Chris; Semin, Frank; Stage, Michael G.; Stevens, Bob; Swett, Larry; Thomas, Steve; Threet, Kay; Valley, Lisa; Watson, Kimberly; Weller, Steve; Westfall, Roger; Wilkinson, Chuck; Williams, Jo; Williams, John; Cappiello, Deborah; Hook, Connie; McCoy, Julie; Ramirez, Pilar; Robertson, Audrey; Wadle, Susan; Wehring, Linda
Subject:	RE: Bid Cycle Meeting

The Bib Cycle meeting date is changed from Friday Oct.26th to Wednesday, Oct. 25th at 10:30 a.m.  The Houston folks will  use Dave Neubauer's office 3963.  Omaha folks will use 696.

Jo will initiate the conference call:
Houston 713-853-7240
Mpls  952-887-1789

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gracey, Rosemary
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 11:17 AM
To:	Aschwege, Doug; Johnson, Robert L.; Sans Souci, Becki; Barker, Courtney; Barry, Mike; Berg, Vicki; Bolks, Sean; Bollinger, Joni; Bowers, Janet; Branney, Theresa; Brennan, Lorna; Burleson, Bob; Cabrera, Reyna; Cohrs, Allen; Donoho, Lindy; Dushinske, John; Fiscus, John; Fowler, Bill; Gadd, Eric; Gilbert, Steve; Halpin, Tom; Harris, Steven; Herber, Stephen; Hyatt, Kevin; Johanson, Tim; Jones, Dana; Joyce, Jane; Korbelik, Stephanie; Lagerstrom, Karen; Lantefield, Laura; Lindberg, Lorraine; Lohman, TK; Lokay, Michelle; McCarran, Penny; McGowan, Mike W.; Mercaldo, Vernon; Millar, John; Miller, Kent; Moore, Jan; Neubauer, Dave; Neville, Sue; Oldenhuis, Frank; Paladino, Ranelle; Pavlou, Larry; Penkava, Loren; Powell, Don; Powers, Ken; Pritchard, John; Riehm, Richard; Roobaert, Preston; Sebesta, Chris; Semin, Frank; Stage, Michael G.; Stevens, Bob; Swett, Larry; Thomas, Steve; Threet, Kay; Valley, Lisa; Watson, Kimberly; Weller, Steve; Westfall, Roger; Wilkinson, Chuck; Williams, Jo; Williams, John; Cappiello, Deborah; Hook, Connie; McCoy, Julie; Ramirez, Pilar; Robertson, Audrey; Wadle, Susan; Wehring, Linda
Subject:	Bid Cycle Meeting

 << File: BID CYCLE MEETING NOTICE.doc >>

Rosemary Gracey
Marketing - 402/398-7431
rosemary.gracey@enron.com


Assistants, please forward to your groups.
  Attn: Gas Logistics-we will be eating all five days this Bid Week.

Wednesday, November 22st

Breakfast:  Assorted Breakfast Tacos/Fruit
Lunch: Domino's Pizza
Assorted Pizza and Soft Drinks

Monday, November 27th

Breakfast:  Assorted Pastries/Fruit
Lunch:  James Coney Island
Two Coney's (Chilli, Cheese, Onions)
or
One Hamburger (Cheese, Lettuce, Tomato, Pickles, Onions)
Assorted Chips
Cookie or Brownie
Assorted Soft Drinks

Tuesday, November 28th

Breakfast:  Assorted Crossiant Sandwiches/Fruit
Lunch:  Crumley's
Assorted Sandwiches
Tortilla or Baked Potato Soup
Assorted Desserts
Iced Tea

Wednesday, November 29th

Breakfast:  Assorted Breakfast Tacos/Fruit
Lunch:  Trigg's
Barbecued Beef Brisket, Chicken, Smoked Ham, Sausage
Potato Salad/Cole Slaw/Pinto Beans/Jambalaya
Special Recipe Barbecue Sauce
Bread/Cookies
Assorted Soft Drinks

Thursday, November 30th

Breakfast:  Assorted Pastries/Fruit
Lunch:  Kelly's
Chicken Fried Steak
or
Meat Loaf
Mashed Potatoe's/Corn/Green Beans
Assorted Desserts
Iced Tea


Attached is a revised draft of the above-referenced document marked to show
changes.

Please call Rob Taylor with any questions.

Sincerely,

Gina G. Zimmerman
Legal Secretary
Andrews & Kurth L.L.P.
600 Travis, Suite 4200
Houston, Texas  77002
Direct:  713-220-4460
Fax:  713-238-7273
ginazimmerman@andrews-kurth.com

The information contained in this e-mail is legally privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named
above.  If the reader of this e-mail is not an intended recipient, you have
received this e-mail in error and any review, dissemination, distribution or
copying is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this e-mail in error,
please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and permanently delete
the copy you received.  Thank you.

 - Blacklin.DOC


Mary/Holli: Please note this posting.

Al Paschke

 - posting.htm


November 13, 2000
Notice to Member No. 389

New York Mercantile Exchange to Base Certain enymex Contracts on Platts
Benchmarks

The New York Mercantile Exchange and Platts, the world's premier energy
market information service, have signed a letter of intent for Platts pricing
benchmarks to be used in enymex contracts for crude oil, refined oil
products, natural gas, electricity, and metals.

Platts, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies (NYSE: MHP), will also
provide enymex with real-time news and market commentary.

The Exchange will license Platts, price assessments and benchmarks as a basis
for commodities contracts traded on enymex, an internet-based platform for
trading and clearing forward contracts for physical commodities.  The system
is scheduled for launch during the second quarter of 2001.

"Every day, more than $10 billion worth of energy commerce is based on
Platts' exclusive and authoritative price assessments," said Harry Sachinis,
president of Platts. "With this agreement, Platts will extend its leadership
to the emerging world of energy e-commerce. It is significant that the world,
s largest energy exchange, the New York Mercantile Exchange, has chosen to
base its enymex contracts on Platts benchmarks."

Exchange Chairman Daniel Rappaport said, "We are proud that enymex will have
standing behind it the two biggest names in providing price transparency to
the energy and metals industries. This agreement brings us one step closer to
the Exchange,s goal of extending the same leadership and credibility to a B2B
marketplace as we have so successfully offered these industries through our
bricks-and-mortar business.  Most importantly, it will enable us to offer
clearing services and an open marketplace for popular over-the-counter
products."

Platts is the world's largest and most authoritative provider of energy
market information, with more than 325 professionals worldwide and products
ranging from real-time and Internet-based news services, to market reports,
databases, magazines and conferences. The company is also a leading provider
of news, pricing and analysis on the global metals market. Additional
information is available at www.platts.com and www.plattsmetals.com.

Founded in 1888, The McGraw-Hill Companies is a global information services
provider meeting worldwide needs in the financial services, education and
business information markets through leading brands such as Standard & Poor,
s, BusinessWeek and McGraw-Hill Education.  The corporation has more than 400
offices in 32 countries.  Sales in 1999 were $4.0 billion.  Additional
information is available at www.mcgraw-hill.com.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=mark.taylor@enron.com&refd
oc=(00-389)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


here is the file with last night's curves.
PL


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Hanagriff, Richard
Sent:	Thursday, February 21, 2002 9:12 PM
To:	Schoolcraft, Darrell; Lindberg, Lorraine
Subject:	Tw imbal summary

Lorraine
Note that NGPL is making payback this month


Louise,

I am intending to start getting brokers signed up as soon as we know our new company name and have the PA and ETA forms authorised.

Do you think we need explicit buyer authorisation before we start signing up brokers?

Dave


I thought I would send this to you and you could just try to guess what we
want to do.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 07/14/2000 10:31
AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kay Mann                           07/14/2000 10:28 AM

To: Lisa Bills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Thomas
Suffield/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: WestLB docs

Here's a start...
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 07/14/2000 10:28
AM ---------------------------

	From:  Gregg Penman                           07/14/2000 10:25 AM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rusty Stevens/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: WestLB docs

Kay - I contacted Jim Burns and asked him to send me the WestLB docs.  Here
they are.  If you need anything else let me know and I can get it directly
from Jim.  He is very familiar with the WestLB facility.

Gregg
---------------------- Forwarded by Gregg Penman/Corp/Enron on 07/14/2000
10:18 AM ---------------------------

j.burns@pecorp.com on 07/14/2000 09:40:34 AM
To: Gregg.Penman@enron.com
cc:
Subject: WestLB docs

Gregg

Per our conversation

 <<Acquisition Ag exec>>  <<Cash Collateral Deposit Ag exec>>

JAB

----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person
or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential
and/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in
reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient is prohibited.   If you received this in error, please
contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

 - Acquisition Ag exec.doc
 - Cash Collateral Deposit Ag exec.doc


confirming these have been sent to julia chin

Lisa J. Mellencamp
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith St.
Houston, TX  77002
Tel:  (713) 853-7986
Fax: (713) 646-3393

	Mary Cook
	09/15/2000 02:42 PM

		 To: Julia Murray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea V Reed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julia H
Chin/NA/Enron@Enron, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Michael S Galvan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hope Vargas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ryan
Siurek/Corp/Enron@ENRON, AnnMarie Tiller/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Brian
Schwertner/NA/Enron@Enron, Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Sefton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Raptor Swaps:  Privates

The attached swaps will be delivered by hard copy batch, together with the
revised proposal sheets and a copy of the legal worksheets, to Julia Chin
today.  Upon receipt, Julia will attach the valuation data that has been
previously provided to her by Hope Vargas and coordinate execution.

Enron North America Corp.
Mary Cook
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com


As some of you have heard, I have gotten back into the energy business.  I
finished my work in the private equity world with IGP and recently started
with Reliant Resources, the unregulated merchant business of Reliant
Energy.  The company is scheduled to IPO the first week in February with a
distribution of remaining shares some ten months later.  It's a great
challenge to build a business in the face of the upcoming electricity
deregulation in Texas.  For some of my Enron friends that were around when
ECT started trading power and really started growing, the challenge is very
similar.  I'm looking forward to it and I think it will be a lot of fun.

I'm head of a group called Transaction Development & Support focusing
primarily on the large C&I customers.  This group will be responsible for
structuring (that overused word again) deals, keeping the originators
focused on the proper segments of the market, getting the deals sold out
the back door and then tracking the remaining portfolio.

My new contact info is:

tel - 713.207.3170
cell - 713.898.9481
james_r_easter@reliantenergy.com

Now... for those of you looking for a good stock tip and who isn't, I would
strongly advise shorting Starbucks.  As I will no longer be consuming vast
quantities of overpriced latte while digesting the daily Arts section of
the New York Times, I fear for their ongoing viability.

Stay in touch and best wishes to you and your families for the Holidays.

Jim


Hi Jo,

I left you a voice mail, but being an email addict I thought I would send you
a note as well.

Our son, Michael is in a Montessori kindergarten, which we have decided may
not be most suitable for him.  We discussed it with Vivian Shudde, and she
suggested that I give you a call about the Grace School.

My husband and I would like to visit Grace.  We are wondering if it might be
possible to visit tomorrow.  Please let me know what you think.

Thanks,

Kay Mann


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/01/2000
04:29 PM ---------------------------

Bjorn Hagelmann
01/28/2000 09:25 AM
To: William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jonathan Le/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary
Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Philippe A Bibi/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Credit Applicatiions in GRMS

THIS NOTE IS FROM TED MURPHY (not bjorn hagelman)

My understanding is that yet another meeting has been scheduled with the
intent of diverting resources from the GRMS project to some other project.

While I am not privy to the urgency of this other project, I do know that we
have a very large, multi -phase project going in GRMS.
GRMS stands for the GLOBAL RISK MONITORING SYSTEM.  It is not intended to be
a commercial trading product not is its primary purpose for commercial
decision-making.  Conceptually, it is a risk warehouse for the primary
purpose of RAC due to the deficiency of current front office trading systems
and their inability to provide timely, aggregated information useful to RAC.

RAC has spent over a year developing a business plan scope and detailed task
list to accomplish its objectives.  As a firm we are woefully behind our
press clippings in our ability to aggregate and understand our risk profile.
My most recent sojorn  in Europe is a classic example of the current systems
inabilty to aggregate and meet the needs of RAC having abetted poor decision
making and causing cash losses in well in excess of the GRMS budget or that
of the Market Risk Group in RAC.

The GRMS project is a requirement that Bill Bradford and I have in order to
do our jobs.  We have delegated authority to Debbie Brackett and Rudi Zipter
to make decisions regarding priorities and as such meet regularly with
Jonathon and his team as well as Rick Buy to provide updates.  While progress
is never as fast as we would like it, in every instance in which we have only
to rely on RAC, Jonathon's team and Research to make a deadline it haas been
hit.  The primary reason for any delays whatsoever has been the diversion of
resources off the project or the reliance for cooperation from some other
source - most recently the IT staff in London was a tremendous impediment to
deadlines.

Please excuse the frustration that is apparently coming through in this note,
but I feel like the boy with his finger in the dyke and no one is listening.
Also, I have had several employees come to resignation over their frustration
on the lack of management support for this project, usually manifesting
itself in the lack of resources or the diversion of resources devoted to it.

I think we have proven collectively that we can organize a modular multiphase
project and provide tangible deliverables when not distracted.  Please let us
do our jobs.  I do not denigrate the efforts of others, but I believe that
they must either submit their detailed requirements to us for our
consideration of their worthiness to put in OUR que or develop their own
project with their own resources.

Thank you for your consideration of this opinion.  As it relates to things
that will effect the ability of Market Risk to do its job, please consult me
as I would you.

Ted


Please forgive the delay in sending the attachment to you. Mark Haedicke
requested that we add you to the distribution list and we did not add you in
time.


Robert,

Please look into this .

D.
---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 01/07/2000
11:23 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Thu Nguyen                           01/05/2000 10:54 AM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Bridge Back Error - Sitara deal# 118977 Nov 99

Daren,

This deal ended 10/31/99.

Thu
3-7159


---------------------- Forwarded by Stacey Neuweiler/HOU/ECT on 03/24/2000
11:37 AM ---------------------------

Marlene Hilliard
03/24/2000 11:04 AM
To: Stacey Neuweiler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sylvia A
Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Change name on pipeline, Contract No. Teco9121, Global Contract No.
96016601

Please be advised that Contract No. Teco9121 shows in the Global Contract
system as PG&E Texas Pipeline, L.P., however, the pipeline name should be
PG&E Gas Transmission Teco, Inc..  Apparently, the pipeline name was entered
into the global system incorrectly. I have confirmed this with Charles Berner
in the Contracts Administration section and Kim Watson, both with PG&E Gas
Transmission Teco, Inc..  The contract name should be PG&E Gas Transmission
Teco, Inc.

I would like to change the pipeline to reflect the correct pipeline name
effective April 1, 2000.  Thus it will not affect the previous noms for this
contract.

All please respond to let me know if this will cause problems with
replication or anything else with the system.

Julie and Stacey,  Deal No. 47434 is attached to this contract you may need
to change this in your system.

Marlene Hilliard


done

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 12:13 PM
To: Calger, Christopher F.
Subject: RE: Rate Agreement between DWR and the PUC Regarding Creditworthiness

Apologies.  Can we make it 4?

	Christopher F Calger/ENRON@enronXgate 05/16/2001 12:26 PM 	   To: Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron  cc:   Subject: RE: Rate Agreement between DWR and
the PUC Regarding Creditworthiness

3:00 PM?

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 10:23 AM
To: Calger, Christopher F.
Subject: RE: Rate Agreement between DWR and the PUC Regarding Creditworthiness

I'm trying to meet a deadline at the moment, but are you free this
afternoon?  I have some information that can help a lot in that analysis.

Best,
Jeff

	Christopher F Calger/ENRON@enronXgate 05/16/2001 12:19 PM 	   To: Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron  cc: Tracy Ngo/ENRON@enronXgate  Subject: RE: Rate
Agreement between DWR and the PUC Regarding Creditworthiness

 << OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >>  	 << OLE Object:
Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >>

Thanks Jeff.  On a related note, we are trying to put together a financial
"headroom" forecast for DWR/State of California that goes out a few years and
shows:

Rate Revenues
less:  Utility gen costs
 QF costs
 DWR PPA's
 DWR spot purchases
Margin
Total Deficit

Bond Issue
Bond Principal & Interest

Would you know how to get something like that?

Regards,

Chris

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 10:12 AM
To: Calger, Christopher F.; Comnes, Alan; Shapiro, Richard; skean@enron.com;
Steffes, James; Yoder, Christian; Kaufman, Paul
Subject: Rate Agreement between DWR and the PUC Regarding Creditworthiness
Sensitivity: Confidential

FYI:  Just got off the phone with Michael Hoffman, who's one of two key
outside financial advisors to Davis on the electricity crisis. The
administration is trying to get a legally binding agreement between the PUC
and DWR to ensure that the PUC doesn't muck around with the money (via
utility rates) DWR requires to be creditworthy.  They were shooting for this
Friday to have a draft of the document read for folks to review, but it now
looks like it won't get resolved until (at the earliest) next week----seems
that the one PUC lawyer who can actually do the work is on vacation.  Go
figure.

Best,
Jeff


To : NYISO Business Issues Committee

What :    Additional Material (6)
For :     Business Issues Committee Meeting
When:     December 12, 2000

Attached, please find additional meeting material that will be covered
during agenda item #5B.

Regards,

Kristen Kranz
NYISO Customer Technical Services
518-862-9629 - Phone
518-862-9872 - Fax

(See attached file: Agenda#5B_KeyspanMotion.PDF)

 - Agenda#5B_KeyspanMotion.PDF


PLEASE READ FULL MESSAGE TO LEARN HOW TO GET 1,000 FREE CHANCES AT THE
$92,000,000.00 POWERBALL for Saturday, January 26, 2002!

Nobody won PowerBall on Wednesday BUT twelve lucky FreeLotto Players did win $21,000,000.00 in Jackpots! That's really no surprise when you consider that the odds of winning Classic FreeLotto's  $1,000,000.00 Grand Prize are far better than winning PowerBall. In fact, all but their SuperBucks game have better odds than PowerBall.

http://www.freelotto.com/offer.asp?offer=24365

Did you stand in a long line for hours to buy a PowerBall ticket?
Here's a thousand FREE chances to crack one of the biggest Lotto
Jackpots ever. FreeLotto.com is giving you a chance to get in on the action with the PowerBall Club. With FreeLotto's Automatic Subscription Ticket service (F.A.S.T.), you will not only get in on the PowerBall Club, but you will also get 180 chances every month to be entered in each of FreeLotto's six daily jackpot drawings!  That's 180 chances every month at over $11,000,000.00 in prizes EVERY DAY!  Simply subscribe to FreeLotto's F.A.S.T. service and in addition to 6 chances a day to win over $11,000,000.00 in daily prizes, they'll give every new F.A.S.T. subscriber a share of any Jackpot winnings from the 1,000 PowerBall tickets for Saturday January 26th, 2002, listed at the url below.

http://www.freelotto.com/offer.asp?offer=24365

Again, if you click the link below and subscribe to F.A.S.T. before
6:00 PM EDT on Saturday, January 26th, 2002, you will also get a share
of any jackpot winnings from the 1,000 PowerBall tickets listed below.
They don't know how many new F.A.S.T. subscribers will take advantage
of this offer, but with an estimated $92,000,000.00 (Ninety Two Million Dollar) Jackpot, there's plenty of cash to go around!

http://www.freelotto.com/offer.asp?offer=24365

To get in on the action without subscribing to F.A.S.T. please click
the link below:
http://www.freelotto.com/redirect.asp?source=10066
and join FreeLotto for your chance to win over $11,000,000.00 everyday
You must join no later than 6:00 PM EDT on Saturday, January 26th, 2002. Limit one entry per username.

Click here to view the PowerBall numbers:
http://www.freelotto.com/offer.asp?offer=24366

Rules:
http://www.freelotto.com/offer.asp?offer=24344

<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>
* To remove yourself from this mailing list, point your browser to:
http://i.pm0.net/remove?funnymoney:10
* Enter your email address (Andrew.H.Lewis@enron.com) in the field
provided and click "Unsubscribe". The mailing list ID is "funnymoney:10".

OR...

* Reply to this message with the word "remove" in the subject line.

This message was sent to address Andrew.H.Lewis@enron.com
X-PMG-Recipient: Andrew.H.Lewis@enron.com
<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>

pmguid:1c.1gpy.803w8


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 01/31/2001 01:11
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Scott Goodell @ ENRON                           01/31/2001 01:01 PM

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Hendrickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve
Gillespie/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject:

Jan  F
Feb  G
March   H

April        J
May   K
June   M

July  N
August  Q
September  U

October  V
November  X
December  Z


Kathleen,
Please change the first paragraph as follows:
ENA is prepared to furnish you with certain risk analysis information which
is either confidential, proprietary or generally not available to the public
("Confidential Information") in connection with ENA,s disclosure to PERC
and/or enovate for its performing independent risk analysis relating to of
the portfolio of enovate, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company. Such
information may include (but not be limited to) and for PERC,s evaluation of
daily curves such as price, basis, index, volitility and interest rates as
they relate to the operations of enovate, L.L.C.  As a condition to
furnishing Confidential Information, PERC and ENA each agree to the following:

As for the paragraph 7, I've asked Gregg if the disclosures will be one time,
or ongoing.  If the disclosures will be ongoing, we may want to rethink the
effective period to make it two years from the last disclosure.

Gregg also needs a resoluting regarding signing authority, but I've left him
a voice mail asking for more information.
Thanks,

Kay

	From:  Kathleen Carnahan                           11/06/2000 09:13 AM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Draft CA for curves

Attached is a draft of the CA for Peoples based on Gregg Penman's information
below.  Gregg says he also wants some language to be included regarding audit
rights.  I did not include this language because I'm not sure how to word it
(and I could not find an example).

By the way, I used another People's CA I got from Ed's directory as an
example because it seemed to fit better than the one I got from you on Friday.

Gregg wanted some pretty specific reference to the confidential data being
supplied to Peoples, and most of the examples I reviewed were more general.
Please let me know what I need to change.

Kathleen

This is the example I used:

---------------------- Forwarded by Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron on 11/06/2000
09:02 AM ---------------------------
To: Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron, Kay Young/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Draft CA for curves

Kathleen,

We have forms for confidentiality agreements.  All CA's are processed through
Kay Young, as she maintains the data base.  Kay, could you point Kathleen to
the repository of the forms so that she can generate the first draft? By the
way, I've assembled the emails I received on changing the form.  I'll be
happy to take a crack at the revisions if you tell me which form to start
with.  I know it will have to be processed through before it becomes standard.

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/24/2000 08:56
AM ---------------------------
From: Gregg Penman on 10/23/2000 10:28 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Draft CA for curves

Kay - We have previously discussed the idea of a CA to specifically cover the
curves.  We need to put this at the top of the list for this week.  Can you
prepare a CA for the distribution of enovate curves to specific individuals
at Peoples?  I would like it to read as follows:
Basis and Index curves will be provided daily for all points at which enovate
has a position, whether hedged or open, to specific individuals employed in
the risk management area.  (Individuals should be named on a schedule).
Curves are being provided for the express purpose of independent risk
analysis of the enovate portfolio by Peoples Risk Management personnel.

In return, the specific individuals will not forward, copy, or otherwise
distribute the curves to any individual not on the approved schedule.  No
communications, written or verbal, will be made to any person other than the
enovate GM or the Enron designated enovate risk committee member regarding
any aspect of the curves.

I need some language regarding audit rights, but this should get you
started.  Call me to discuss.

Gregg

---------------------- Forwarded by Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron on 11/06/2000
09:02 AM ---------------------------
From: Gregg Penman on 11/01/2000 03:13 PM
To: Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: CA for enovate

Kathleen - As we discussed, here is a high level overview of what I am trying
to accomplish.

Purpose: Employees and representatives of Peoples Energy will be provided
information related to the operations of enovate, L.L.C. that is necessary or
appropriate to review the accuracy of data and verify that the operations and
controls set forth in Section VIII of the enovate, L.L.C. Risk Management
Policy are being properly implemented and followed.  Information may include
forward curves such as price, basis, index,volatility and interest rates to
the extent they relate to the operations of enovate, L.L.C.

Restrictions:  All information provided is deemed confidential.  Information
provided may only be used for the purpose mentioned above.  None of the
provided information may be distributed or communicated to any person who is
not subject to the confidentiality agreement.

Call me with any questions you may have.  Thank you for your assistance.

Gregg


OK.  DF

Christine Stokes
10/12/2000 03:33 PM
To: Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Agave Contract Approval Request

TRANSWESTERN PIPELINE COMPANY
CONTRACT APPROVAL FORM

Please review the attached standard discount letter to Agave Energy Company
(Agave).  The discount letter provides Agave a $.05/Dth/d one-part rate for
10,000 Dth/d of East of Thoreau capacity beginning 3/1/2001.  Alternate
receipt and delivery rights have been granted for the East of Thoreau Area
only.

Please reply via REPLY WITH HISTORY.


Sheila:  ENA is ready to sign (Ihope) in the a.m.  I just wanted to verify
that you had sent an email to Cassandra (or Rick Buy) so that she is prepared
to countersign.

Also, your status report reflects that you also need a custody agreement for
ECT Investments.  Why?

Thanks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Team:

We are fast approaching our June 1 date to Close the HPL transaction.  A critical path items is to complete the unwind of the monetizations of HPL assets.  There are a number of converging activities that will require legal resources, so it is important that we clear out as many activities as possible so we don't reach legal gridlock at the end of May.

Tim Despain, can you lend your support to Ranabir/Shirley to move Hancock and Prudential to act?  Let me know if further resources/attention is needed.  Right now Hancock/Pru are the bottlenecks.

Anne, I will call HCC and see where we are on unwinding the Project Rock meter monetization based on the documents you sent them.

Ranabir, can you prepare a schedule showing when we will have each monetization unwound and what the critical items/actions are for each.

Let me know if you need additional resources.  Lets get this done!

Thanks,
Brian


Ted Murphy and I met with the Arther Andersen team this morning that
accompanied us on our trip to Buenos Aires.  We reviewed the observations and
recommendations in written form that we had discussed briefly with you on our
last day your office.  After making a few changes, AA should be forwarding to
you a copy of the draft document later this afternoon.   We would welcome
your comments and your additions on anything that you think we may have
missed.  Ted and I will be meeting with Rick Causey and Rick Buy within the
next couple of days to discuss our operations and control review, so your
responses would be welcomed prior to that meeting.

I look forward to working with you and others in your office in my role over
Global Risk Management Operations.  In addition to overseeing common
standards and controls for opeartional practices, I will work as your
advocate for system and resource needs in order to insure success for your
business plan in Buenos Aires.


---------------------- Forwarded by Sandra F Brawner/HOU/ECT on 03/28/2001
08:10 AM ---------------------------

"susan schnitzer" <s.schnitzer@worldnet.att.net> on 03/27/2001 04:44:45 PM
To: "sandra brawner" <sbrawne@ect.enron.com>, "pam anderson" <pama9@flash.net>
cc:
Subject: Fw: Fw: TIGHT  SKIRTS  AND  TEXANS

-----Original Message-----
From: mizzjodi@juno.com <mizzjodi@juno.com>
To: julie615@optonline.net <julie615@optonline.net>; hanaone@aol.com
<hanaone@aol.com>; bbron58584@aol.com <bbron58584@aol.com>; lcbron@aol.com
<lcbron@aol.com>; giannini_sa@williscorroon.com
<giannini_sa@williscorroon.com>; danielle.karwoski@dowjones.com
<danielle.karwoski@dowjones.com>; skaszer@hotmail.com <skaszer@hotmail.com>;
preventdk@dellmail.com <preventdk@dellmail.com>;
leanne_michalek@njb.uscourts.gov <leanne_michalek@njb.uscourts.gov>;
bposkitt@sprintmail.com <bposkitt@sprintmail.com>; kjposkitt@aol.com
<kjposkitt@aol.com>; poskitt@worldnet.att.net <poskitt@worldnet.att.net>;
msawatka@hotmail.com <msawatka@hotmail.com>; s.schnitzer@worldnet.att.net
<s.schnitzer@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Monday, March 26, 2001 2:04 PM
Subject: Fw: Fw: TIGHT SKIRTS AND TEXANS

>>
>
>TIGHT SKIRTS AND TEXANS
>> > > > > > > > > >
> In a crowded city at a crowded bus stop, a beautiful
>young woman was waiting for the bus. She was decked out in a tight
>leather mini skirt with matching tight leather boots and jacket.
>
>As the bus rolled up and it became her turn to get on, she became aware
>that her
>skirt was too tight to allow her leg to come up to the height of the
>first step on the
>bus. Slightly embarrassed, and with a quick smile to the bus
> driver, she reached behind her and unzipped her skirt a little, thinking
>that this would give her enough slack to raise her leg.  Again she tried
>to make  the step on to the bus only to discover she still
> couldn't.
>
>So, a little more embarrassed, she once again reached
>behind her and unzipped her skirt a little more and, for a second time
>attempted the step.
>Once again, much to her chagrin, she could not raise her
>leg because of the tight skirt. With a coy little smile to the driver,
>she
> again unzipped the offending skirt to give a little more slack and again
>was unable to make the step.
>
>About this time, the big Texan behind her in line picked
>her up easily from the waist and placed her lightly on the top step of
>the
>> bus.
> She went absolutely ballistic and turned on the would-be
>hero, screeching at him. "How dare you touch my body!!
>I don't even know who you
> are!"
>
> At this, the Texan drawled, "Well Ma'am, normally I
>would  agree with you, but after you unzipped my fly three times, I kinda
>figured that we was  friends."
>> > > > > > >
>
>
>________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>


This request has been pending approval for  8 days and you are the alternate.  Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000078937&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000078937
Approver            : sandeep.kohli@enron.com
Request Create Date : 12/11/01 10:29:11 AM
Requested For       : carrie.larkworthy@enron.com
Resource Name       : \\enehou\houston\common\Research - [Read]
Resource Type       : Directory


Attached are David's insurance comments to the original O&M Draft.  Please
incorporate these into the agreement.

----- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 01/12/2001 02:55 PM -----

	David Marshall
	01/12/2001 02:30 PM

		 To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: O&M Agreement Draft

Gerald,

Sorry to not have gotten this to you sooner but I have been buried today
Please call me with questions


Would you also please set this person up for an interview as well.  Thanks.
PL

---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 05/03/2001
02:22 PM ---------------------------

Joy Werner@ENRON
05/03/2001 01:42 PM
To: Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Meghan Watkin's resume - re Chance Rabon


---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 12/17/99 10:02
AM ---------------------------

Scott Donaldson@EES
12/17/99 09:36 AM
To: Alicia Goodrow/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT,
michael.k.patrick@us.arthurandersen.com, Wade Stubblefield/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Joel Ephross/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Project Blackbird Draft Docs

---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Donaldson/HOU/EES on 12/17/99 09:30
AM ---------------------------

"MURIEL McFARLING" <MCFAM@andrews-kurth.com> on 12/16/99 08:19:16 PM

To:	Arafte@bracepatt.com, mmoreland@bracepatt.com, sgussett@bracepatt.com,
ttomlinson@bracepatt.com, Deborah Culver/HOU/EES@EES, Jimmie
Williams/HOU/EES@EES, Robert Callan/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Donaldson/HOU/EES@EES,
mniebruegge@mayerbrown.com, eawilburn@prickett.com, Kenton@rlf.com,
jephross@velaw.com
cc:	"DAVID BARBOUR" <BARBD@andrews-kurth.com>, "DALLAS GUEST ACCOUNT #2"
<DGUEST2@andrews-kurth.com>, "DEBORAH LOWE" <LOWED@andrews-kurth.com>,
"MURIEL McFARLING" <MCFAM@andrews-kurth.com>

Subject:	Project Blackbird

Attached, in Microsoft Word format, are initial drafts of each of the
following documents:

LLC Agreement - Blackbird 1 (221575_2)
LLC Agreement - Blackbird 2 (221576_2)
Trust Agreement - Blackbird 1 Interst Owner Trust (221577_2)
Facility Agreement (221578_2)
Schedule to ISDA Master Agreement (221579_2)
Sale and Auction Agreement (221582_2)
Total Return Swap Confirmation (221685_2)

 - 221685_2.doc
 - 221576_2.doc
 - 221577_2.doc
 - 221578_2.doc
 - 221579_2.doc
 - 221582_2.doc
 - 221575_2.doc


Market Participants:

Please assure that this Notification is forwarded to your respective
Operating Departments for Review ---

Notification of Operating Procedure Update

* The following new or revised ISO Operating Procedures have been
implemented and are posted for reference on the ISO Website.

ISO Operating Procedure posted:  E-508 Electrical Emergency Plan
Version: 1.6
Effective Date: 8-29-2000
Changes / Reasons: Minor editorial changes

* Please find them at
http://www1.caiso.com/thegrid/operations/opsdoc/index.html under the
appropriate Operating Procedure section heading.

If you have any questions, please e-mail the 'Procedure Control Desk'
mailbox at procctrldesk@caiso.com and we will respond as soon as possible.

Thank-You,

Operations Support and Training


Here are the confirms that Joe prepared.
----- Forwarded by Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT on 04/03/2001 05:23 PM -----

	Larry Joe Hunter
	03/29/2001 04:45 PM

		 To: Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Confirm

Stacy,

See attached.  We do have an executed ISDA with NUI Energy Brokers, Inc.
Also, there is Draft language in the header and footer that you may want to
take out.

Thanks,
Joe


Kramer,

Cowan is trading Alberta cash and I'm trading the front of the curve. Lavo
still trades the term in Alberta but is never around. As for Benny, after an
unfortunate incident at September's craw fish boil, he has moved to Houston
to trade power. No shit!

Drop me a line with a number where you can be reached. I have an idea, like
everyone else in the world, for an internet start up and want to pick your
brain about the process of doing a business plan, getting VC $'s and such. I
don't know if you know much about that stuff but your thoughts would be
greatly appreciated. I have a friend in the Internet group at Goldman Sach's
and I've talked to him about it but I want insight from someone inside the
industry.

There is a revolution going on and I think I am the only one not getting rich
off of it.

Check out enron stock (ENE). We announced an alliance with Sun Microsystems
to build a bandwidth network and the stock has doubled in a month. Not bad
for a small Texas pipeline company. You would need a sand blaster to get the
smile off of Lavorato's face. However I don't think I'm going to retire on my
Enron options any time soon.

Gotta hop!

Dorland

(PS You should send Wilson a Bigwords t-shirt. The Jannon's would do the logo
justice.)


Does this project have another name?  I'm not familiar with Fountain Valley.
Is this the same as PSCO?

Kay

Ed Dannhaus@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
11/20/2000 10:28 AM
To: Kay Mann@ENRON
cc: Chris Booth@ENRON, Jeff G Slaughter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Fountain Valley Power Project
Revised GE order for two additional exhaust stacks

Where do we stand in issuing the change order for two additional exhaust
stacks for the Fountain Valley Power Project?????


MEMORANDUM

TO:	State Issues Committee
                Public Affairs Committee

FROM:	Jane Cahill, State Issues Committee Chair
                Jana Martin, Public Affairs Committee Chair
                Mark Stultz, Vice President of Public Affairs & Marketing
                Samantha Slater, Manager of State & Regional Affairs

DATE:	November 19, 2001

RE:	EPSA State Issues & Public Affairs Action Plan for 2002	Conference Call on Friday, November 30th at 11:00 a.m. (EST)

On Friday, November 30, 2001 at 11:00 a.m. (EST), the Public Affairs and State Issues Committees will hold a conference call to begin discussions regarding specific public affairs actions to be taken by EPSA to support state restructuring efforts, as well as the development of merchant power plant projects nationwide.  During the conference call, we will formulate a preliminary list of states and/or regions for EPSA to target during our initial efforts for 2002.

To access this call dial 1-800-937-6563.  Ask for the EPSA/Samantha Slater Call.   If you have any questions or concerns, or cannot participate on the conference call, please call Mark Stultz or Samantha Slater at EPSA (202-628-8200) prior to November 30th.