----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 01/03/2001 01:27 PM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	01/03/2001 01:20 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Angela Schwarz/HOU/EES@EES, Beverly
Aden/HOU/EES@EES, Bill Votaw/HOU/EES@EES, Brenda Barreda/HOU/EES@EES, Carol
Moffett/HOU/EES@EES, Cathy Corbin/HOU/EES@EES, Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Christina Liscano/HOU/EES@EES, Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Craig H
Sutter/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Debora Whitehead/HOU/EES@EES,
Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Dorothy
Youngblood/HOU/ECT@ECT, Douglas Huth/HOU/EES@EES, Edward
Sacks/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Eric Melvin/HOU/EES@EES, Erika Dupre/HOU/EES@EES,
Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Fran Deltoro/HOU/EES@EES, Frank W
Vickers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gayle W Muench/HOU/EES@EES, Ginger
Dernehl/NA/Enron@ENRON, Gordon Savage/HOU/EES@EES, Harold G
Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@ENRON, Iris Waser/HOU/EES@EES,
James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, James
Wright/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, Jeff Messina/HOU/EES@EES,
Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Jess Hewitt/HOU/EES@EES, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathy
Bass/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES, Ken Gustafson/HOU/EES@EES, Kevin
Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Leasa Lopez/HOU/EES@EES, Leticia Botello/HOU/EES@EES,
Mark S Muller/HOU/EES@EES, Marsha Suggs/HOU/EES@EES, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES,
Meredith M Eggleston/HOU/EES@EES, Michael Etringer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Mann/HOU/EES@EES, Michelle D Cisneros/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike M Smith/HOU/EES@EES,
mpalmer@enron.com, Neil Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Neil Hong/HOU/EES@EES, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Paula Warren/HOU/EES@EES, Richard L
Zdunkewicz/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Leibert/HOU/EES@EES, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON, Rita Hennessy/NA/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, Rosalinda Tijerina/HOU/EES@EES,
Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott
Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Sharon Dick/HOU/EES@EES,
skean@enron.com, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tanya Leslie/HOU/EES@EES, Tasha
Lair/HOU/EES@EES, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terri Greenlee/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tim
Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tony Spruiell/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES,
Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: PUC DRAFT Decision

Here's a copy of the draft.

 - CPUC01-#86861-v1-A0011038_et_al__Minkin_Agenda_Dec___.doc


I'll be leaving for New Orleans in about 30 minutes for our legal
conference.  It was fun visiting with you too.  I miss you terribly.


Steve. fyi, Mike Terraso

-----Original Message-----
From: Stringer, Alan
Sent: Wed 7/18/2001 9:07 AM
To: Van, Henry; Terraso, Michael
Cc:
Subject: FW: Draft Response

FYI - draft response attached.

It is likely that I may be required to go out to Mumbai and sit down with
management at DPC and go through the potential options that are available to
help them move forward.

regards
;-----Original Message-----
From: ; Stringer, Alan;
Sent:;; 18 July 2001 14:44
To:;;;; Ramaswamy, Pancharatnam
Subject:;;;;;;; RE: Draft Response

My comments

call me to discuss if you need to.

<<Responsetoshowcauseascomments.doc>>

 ;-----Original Message-----
From: ; Ramaswamy, Pancharatnam;
Sent:;; 18 July 2001 13:36
To:;;;; Stringer, Alan
Subject:;;;;;;; Draft Response

 ;<< File: Responsetoshowcause.doc >>


Just to clarify the Canadian situation, we will not be able to assign the MSA's to NETCO without the customer's approval.  To date, this has not occurred.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Yanowski, Tommy J.
Sent:	Wednesday, January 02, 2002 2:50 PM
To:	Perlman, Beth; Johnson, Jeff; Stock, Steve; McAuliffe, Bob
Cc:	Webb, Jay; Burchfield, Richard; Beck, Sally; Piper, Greg; Kitchen, Louise; Hedstrom, Peggy; Koehler, Anne C.; Redmond, Brian
Subject:	IT & Back Office Service Agreements

Enron North America and Enron Canada are still providing IT and Back Office Services to several parties.  Beth has expressed some concerns about the estate's ability to be able to support  a production trading environment once a split of applications and hardware is made between NETCO and the estate.  Given this we need to make some decisions as to how to best handle these services agreements.  Here are some suggestions:

Peggy Hedstrom, in Calgary would like to assign the Enron Canada Master Services agreements to NETCO and continue to service those via that entity.

Bridgeline, which is a JV in which ENA owns a 40% interest, currently has no way that they can support themselves.  They are totally dependent on Enron for everything from email, internet, network services and office applications as well as trading, risk and back office applications.  If there are concerns about the estate's ability to support Bridgeline then it may be in Enron's best interest to assign this agreement to NETCO.

AEP/HPL is more of a stand alone operation.  They have their own infrastructure in place and currently provide for their own email and office support services.  They have also brought up with their own version of our SCADA system and are in the process of trying to bring up their own version of our Pipeline Operations system.  If we sell them our version of PGAS to support their measurement operations they will then try to tie these applications into their own Trade Blotter, Open Link Financials and Altra.  Their goal was to try and have all of this in place by sometime in June of this year.  Given all of the Commercial conflicts with AEP regarding the sale of HPL it may make the most sense to leave this agreement with the estate and suggest that AEP try to be stand alone ASAP.  That way if the estate defaults on the service agreement then they can at least manually rekey information from one system to another until they have put in their own integration between the applications listed above.

Please let me know if you have any comments or if it makes sense to put together a meeting to discuss the issues of Service Agreements.

Tommy J Yanowski
Sr. Director - Enron Net Works
Work # 713.853.6858
Cell # 713.539.7094

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Perlman, Beth
Sent:	Wednesday, December 19, 2001 3:54 PM
To:	Johnson, Jeff; Stock, Steve; McAuliffe, Bob
Cc:	Webb, Jay; Yanowski, Tommy J.; Burchfield, Richard
Subject:	RE: Integration Test Planning / Coordination Mtg Summary

The AEP and Bridgeline deals must be investigated.  There is no way the estate can support a production environment.  I will be reviewing the contracts to determine our obligations and possible alternatives.

Beth

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Johnson, Jeff
Sent:	Wednesday, December 19, 2001 2:23 PM
To:	Stock, Steve; McAuliffe, Bob; Greig, Iain; Nommensen, Dave; Ward, Bob; Sanvido, Terry; Wei, Zhiyong; Nat, Steve; Harmon, Kenneth M.; Warner, John; Saleem, Aftab; Smith, Regan M.; Hillier, Bob
Cc:	Webb, Jay; Perlman, Beth
Subject:	Integration Test Planning / Coordination Mtg Summary

Key Planning Assumptions
1) Jan 20 go live
2) New Co Conversions must be completed and tested by application teams by Jan 15. This assumes all major production data setup - users, rights, books, global data - is completed and tested on a per application basis. Some code changes may still be in process but integration testing can begin to ensure the applications still talk to each other.
3) Integration test planning focus will be to run representative transactions from EOL to SAP through all core trading applications to ensure that applications and interfaces still work. We will not be testing functional permutations, data conditions, validation or exceptions to any significant degree.
4) Each application conversion team must test their changes before approving their changes for integration testing. We are operating from the premise that data, infrastructure and code changes have been tested at a application system level before the enterprise integration test starts.
4) All systems will be physically split (even Unify at this point).
5) Integration test team will develop and execute the test plan for both Estate and New Co.
6) We will integrate key business reps into the process for planning and execution and they will have shared responsibility for signoff on the test to support go live to production.
7) We will minimize the differentiation between New Co and Estate for conversion and test team purposes. There are two teams - Conversion and Integration Test. Each team will focus on both Estate and New Co. Resources are too tight and the process is too inefficient to separate responsibility.
8) Estate conversions must happen at the application level before New Co conversion work can begin in earnest. Estate conversion is on the critical path for New Co.

Key Issues
1) We will push to get a decision to see if we can focus on financial trading first, then physical. If financial is the focus, delivery risk goes down dramatically. For now, we must plan on the worst case -- physical and financial on Jan 20.
2) We need both a dev and a test environment for all systems that support AEP and Bridgeline in Estate. This means that we need a dev environment (and HW gap addressed) for Unify, Sitara, CPR, TAGG/ERMS. Conversion teams need to coordinate with infrastructure immediately on this issue to make sure we're in synch.
3) Unify servers probably can't be owned by New Co while running a single license of Unify.
4) Some systems are using 'short name' instead of Duns ID as a key for counterparties from Global. The Global, TAGG / ERMS, Unify and SAP reps must quickly define the best approach for making global data changes and minimizing hard coded reference id risks.
5) We must clearly define limits of conversion and test scope to hit these potential dates. We must focus on core systems with only core changes required to support day one trading.
6) We can only convert Estate over the weekend due to AEP / Bridgeline considerations. The time window will be very small.

Core Conversion Team
1) Steve Stock - Applications
2) Bob McAuliffe - Infrastructure
3) Ziyong Wei
4) Steve Nat
5) Dave Nommensen
6) Ken Harmon
7) John Warner
8) Bob Ward
....

Core Integration Test Team
1) Jeff Johnson
2) Iain Greig
3) Aftab Saleem
4) Terry Sanvido
5) Regan Smith

Program Coordination
1) Jane Henry
2) Steve Simpson

Next Steps For Integration Test Team
1) Due 12/20. Define integration test approach and id test script and expected results templates. Owner: Aftab Saleem / Regan Smith
2) Due Jan 3. Application system flow diagram at appropriate granularity for communicating flow on integration test for core systems. Owner: Terry Sanvido / Steve Simpson
3) Due 12/20. Identify list of core systems for test purposes. Identify key IT owner and key business owner and respresentative for integration test. Owner: Iain Greig.
4) Due 12/21. Define integration test workplan for integration test planning and execution for both Estate and New Co. Owner: Jeff Johnson
5) Ongoing. Participation in daily program management coordination meeting at 8:30. Owners: Jeff Johnson, Iain Greig, Aftab Saleem.
6) Due 12/21. Organize meeting with key users and IT contacts to communciate foundation assumptions, context, team and approach for integration test. Develop first cut at sample trade transaction set. Owner: Iain Greig / Aftab Saleem.
7) Completed. Contact Bob Hall, Leslie Reeves, Bob Superty, Brice Baxter to communicate above and set up meeting to begin planning with them on the integration testing process. Owner: Jeff Johnson
8) Due 12/21.  Refine core system list with IT owners and Business owners for integration test purposes. Owner: Iain Greig.
9) Due 12/20. Set up Integration Test folder on O drive under Infotech / Development Support.  Owner: Aftab Saleem.

Let me know if you have questions or changes. I am out tomorrow but I'm back on Friday.

Thanks.


Hi, Sooz!  Really enjoyed your visit and hope you had a good trip back to
Houston.  I'm so glad you came, it really made the weekend fly by.  Tying up
loose ends today and I take off at 7:00 a.m. tomorrow.  See you when I
return.  I'll send a card!
love, mum


As of this week EnronOnline has just started offering US/Canadian Dollar
Swaps Online.  As part of my review in determining whether a counterparty can
transact these products online I look at the Financial Trading Agreement
Database to see if there are any restrictions indicated, check the master
swap agreement, and I am also looking at any Board Resolutions we might have
received when we got the master agreement executed.

What I am finding is that in the old days when we asked for resolutions
evidencing the authority to enter into the master agreement/derivative
transactions frequently the resolutions do not allow the counterparies to
enter into currency transactions.  Since transacting these currency
transactions with our energy customers is a new area of business for us I
just wanted us all to be mindful to check these old resolutions and not to
rely solely on the "Restrictions" contained in Lotus Notes.


All,

Tanya thought that there were several issues raised by Carol and/or Sara
regarding the ISDA for Montana Power Company that you wanted to discuss with
Tanya before the draft was sent to the Counterparty.  She is not sure what
you wanted to discuss.  Please let me know and I will convey the info to
Tanya.

Thanks,
Stephanie


Chris and the broker agreed to the broker's price - I've changed this deal to
a price of 165.00. Thanks for waiting.

Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
02/05/2001 11:01 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: 2-2-01 Checkoutq

Kate what is the status of this deal?

   Kate Symes @ ECT                02/02/2001 04:13 PM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: 2-2-01 Checkoutq

Chris Mallory and the Prebon broker are currently debating this price. I'll
let you know when they settle it.

Thanks,
Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
02/02/2001 01:30 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 2-2-01 Checkoutq

Chris Mallory
Deal 512609
Prebon shows price as $165....Enpower has $160.


Duude,
What's happening? Finally getting around to getting
you my new email and tele #. I left Pru back in
mid-December and have been running non-stop with the
new job. It is a world of difference going from Corp
America to a start-up, but its been fun.

Been doing some traveling and spending a lot of time
trying to get new customers and servicing the ones we
sign up.

So how was N.O.? I'm sure that the three of you didn't
do any drinking or got into any trouble.

Tell the lovely Mrs. Ruscitti that we say hello. Don't
forget, let me know the next time you are in Jersey
and if you have time we should hook up.

I had bookmarked Mr. Conway's email on my computer at
Pru and forgot to take it with me, can you send it to
me. Thanks and talk to you soon,

=====
Jonathan Coun
Vice President, SPACEdirect Development
NetStruxr
212 858-7723
jcoun@netstruxr.com

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
a year!  http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/


Well the Fed didn't and immediately everyone started speculating about
August. The Nasdaq acted well up over 80 although it lost some ground in the
last half hour (down over 30). The Dow and the S&P had some gains but lost
everything in the last hour - Dow closing up 23 (was up over 90) and S&P up
4 (was up 13)... news of the day centered around QCOM (Qualcomm) and talk of
problems in Korea (a major profit center) - the stock had an intra-day swing
of 10 to close nearly unchanged; ERICY (LM Eric Tel) was up 3 1/2% while NOK
(Nokia) was down 4 1/2% meanwhile in telco land - WCOM (Worldcom) was up 12%
on analyst comments while the ex-fiancee FON (Sprint Fon Grp) was down over
9%, T (AT&T) was down chips were ho hum TXN (Texas Instruments) down small,
MOT (Motorola) down 2%, INTC (Intel Corp) even, AMD (Advanced Micro Devices)
down 5%; it wasn't all bad in tech with MCRE (Metacreations) up 11%, HWP
(Hewlett-Packard) and AAPL (Apple Computer) up over 5%, SUNW (Sun
Microsystems) up 3%, GE (General Electric) up 2% but IBM,  MSFT (Microsoft)
and ORCL (Oracle) were about even. In the CEUT Universe: Mr. Bezos continued
his strong defense of AMZN* (Amazon) against negative analyst comments at
the PC Expo and CNBC - the stock moved slightly to the positive.... MANU*
(Manugistics) up over 7 on positive announcement on a collaboration with GE,
ITWO* (I2 Technologies) was down 2 and PSDI (Project Software) was up 2...
SSTI* (Silicon Storage) continued its fall - down 6 and KOPN* (Kopin) and
MTLK* (Metalink Ltd) were both down over 4 1/2, ZRAN* (Zoran) up 2... JDSU*
(JDS Uniphase) up 3..... BRCD* (Brodcade Communications) up over 10....
PROX* (Proxim) up over 7 while GOAM (Goamerica) came in hard - down 18% (it
had that strong run up).... MERQ (Mercury Interactive) and MUSE* (Micromuse)
up over 5....TMPW* (TMP Worldwide) up over 1 1/2.... SIRI+ (Sirius
Satellite) up over 2,  DISH+ (Echostar Communications) down over 2, GSTRF+
(Globalstar Communications )up small on muted reaction to their unexpectedly
taking the line of credit, GMH* (General Motors H) continued it's fall down
2 1/2 - its splits tomorrow, XMSR (XM Satellite) up over 2, SPOT (Panam Sat)
up over 1... JBL* (Jabil Circuit) up 1, SIMG* (Silicon Image) up over 1
1/2... WCII* (Winstar Communications) up over 1.... In IPOland - what a
difference a day makes - Geniuty (GENU) - an e-business net infrastructure
co. had a tough debut  - falling 14% and prompting one IPO site to issue an
apology of sorts for recommending the issue - pundits blamed the size of the
deal as leading to the problems (70% of the shares traded).  Coming today -
Virage Inc. (VRGE) - soft for video over net - priced mid range; ACCD -
Accord Networks - network for real-time communcications. - priced mid range.

Palm - beat # but problems with a chip.

Larry Ellison - taking heat for spying on MSFT (he defends action).

Deut T - bond deal went well/ interested in FON?/

SpeechWorks - 2 new products - voice recong. apps for net.

Cabletron - bigger loss.

RealNetworks and Nokia - team for music and video over phone.

YHOO - buys eGroups (mail).

Six Airlines team to offer discount tickets via net - watch out Priceline.

Priceline - launching Priceline Europe/ Also - is Vulcan selling their
shares?/

IBM - built fastest computer ever for Engergy Dept.

Australian Treasury Dept - hack attacked.

Richard Li - CyberWorks tycoon - lauches billion dollar backed "Network of
the World" - produce interactive ent. (games etc) and net access via phone,
TV or PC.

Survey - 5,000 dot com jobs gone since Dec.

Deut T's T mobile unit - suvey of users shows WAP isn't catching on.

Topps - special ecard (baseball cards) over net.

Telefonica - Villalonga still Chairman - what scandel?

Czech ISP - gets $2.4  million from Siemens and others.

Nokia - opening office in Israel to form VC ventures.

Former lead banking analyst for UBS censured and fined for starting rumors.

Ebay* - revamp auto site.

M & M's Plain - new name M & M's Milk Chocolate

Prodigy - moving from NY to Texas - also executive shifts.

Icebox.com - in hot water for racist cartoon.

TYC buys MKG.

VSAT+ replacing Sports Auth. (TSA) in S&P Small Cap 600.

Smartmoney - Invesco Fund Manager names GMH* as top pick.

EXDS - double size of bond issue.

CPQ - new ibook inspired laptop - Presario 1400.

Steve Young - ex-football star starting Utah based VC firm - First Light
Ventures.

Pixo - wireless soft for phones - offering new employees all expenses paid
week in Hawaii.

WSJ Heard - WCOM deal demise - not a surprise.

MP3.com - device to provide music in many business settings - while you
work, when people on hold...

AOL - class action suit by people who subscribe by the hour (not a huge %) -
why should we pay to watch ads?

GLW - expanding photonics plant 700 new jobs.

INTC - Williamette - chip now called Pentium IV.

Zoran* - buys sensor co. Pixelcam.

MMG - buys 70% stake in Romanian ISP.

Fortune Mag. - best co. for minorities - Advantica (DINE) - yes the people
who own Denny's

There is talk: NTT for WCOM?/ HLIT in play?/  PXD in play/

C.E. Unterberg Towbin: Futurlink secondary today/ Infovista in Boston.

The information contained herein is obtained from sources we believe to be
reliable but its accuracy and completeness, and that of the opinions based
thereon, are not guaranteed. C.E. Unterberg Towbin, or one or more of its
partners, may have a position in any of the securities discussed herein. All
rights reserved by C.E. Unterberg Towbin. May not be reproduced in whole or
in part without prior written authorization. This report is not an offer to
sell or solicitation of an offer to buy the securities mentioned herein.
*C.E. Unterberg Towbin makes a market in this security and/or has analyst
coverage.
+C.E. Unterberg Towbin makes a market in this security and has been involved
in a recent financing.
_____________________________
Bram Towbin
C.E. Unterberg Towbin
10 East 50th Street
New York NY 10022

Telephone: 212 572 8163
Fax: 212 759 4032
Btowbin@unterberg.com
www.unterberg.com

----------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to SEC and NASD requirements, all incoming and outgoing e-mail of
C.E. Unterberg, Towbin is subject to review by the Compliance Department.

Please note that C.E. Unterberg, Towbin does not allow the use of e-mail to
request, authorize or  effect the purchase or sale of any security, to send
fund transfer instructions, or to effect any other transactions.  Any such
request, orders or instructions that you send will not be accepted and will
not be processed.

================================================================


Jay,

I can't see the new IRAs on the web site.  It's no big deal.  But I would
like to have them linked.  Thanks.  Did you go to the playoff games?  It's
been a long time coming.

DG


Gerald the changes look fine to me.  In Section 1, the second comment, there
is a defined accronym ("AMUS"). There is no other reference to AMUS.  Was
this intended?

Clem

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Nemec, Gerald
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 2:16 PM
To: Abrams, Clement
Subject: AEC Guaranty

Clement,  Please review AEC's additions and let me know what you think.

 << File: AEC Guaranty.doc >>


---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 05/19/2000 11:41 AM
---------------------------

"Larry W. Bass" <lwbthemarine@bigplanet.com> on 05/19/2000 11:27:43 AM
To: peggy dan maynard <peggy@airmail.net>, Pam Day <pkjday@yahoo.com>,
michael don ferguson <mfe252@mail.airmail.net>, "Marsters, Linda"
<lmarsters@fortbend.k12.tx.us>, kathy bass <daphneco@earthlink.net>, Julie &
Mark Stevens <JUMACK@airmail.net>, joni drude <jfdr@chevron.com>, jason
<jason.bass2@compaq.com>, "Henry C. McGill" <hmcgill-satx@worldnet.att.net>,
gail stoops <Ggstops@aol.com>, Frank Marsters <marstersco@earthlink.net>,
eric preston bass <Eric.Bass@enron.com>, christine marsters
<wxranch@airmail.net>, Bill Daniel <bdaniel@pflash.com>, beth dahlberg
<dhlbrg@aol.com>, Barbara Bass <xwb2@flash.net>, Andrea Lyles
<andrearonnie@cs.com>, ryan darr <fastfeet15@aol.com>, richard and marty darr
<Rdarr@flash.net>, lauren darr <L2giveJ@aol.com>
cc:
Subject: More than Just a Flag - By J.J. Johnson

Kathy sent this to me. Very interesting perspective  from a black man
concerning the Confederate flag and similar  issues.-L

?http://www.sierratimes.com/edjj041400.htm#top
 - More than Just a Flag - By J.J. Johnson.url


I think that the "general policies" route is the right (and only) one -
particularly for the vast number of reference entities envisaged.  From a
legal sign off perspective, we should be able to give the immediate all
clear, provided
in the case of a ref entity, that it is not an existing customer/counterparty
of Enron (if it is we'll need to check confidentiality agreements etc).
We'll need to work out the quickest way of establishing this (but it is not
per se a legal task)
in the case of a ref entity, that we have carried out the necessary the legal
due diligence in its country of establishment/location
in the case of a counterparty, that we have carried out the necessary legal
due diligence in its country of establishment/location

Of course our legal due diligence may require us to take additional steps in
the case of some countries/counterparties, but we will address these steps as
generically as possible.

Hope this gives a sense of where we're coming from.  Please call me to
discuss further if need be.

Paul

Tomas Valnek
22/05/2000 10:44
To: Bryan Seyfried/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Denis O'Connell/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul
Simons/LON/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Rod Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT,
ECT London Credit Trading

Subject: Re: Credit Trading - Approval Form

I agree that the current Word document approval form will not be very
practical once we scale up. Going forward, we could be looking at some kind
of database solution as implemented for EnronOnline.

TV

Bryan Seyfried
20/05/2000 13:09
To: Tomas Valnek/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Denis O'Connell/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul
Simons/LON/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Rod Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT,
ECT London Credit Trading

Subject: Re: Credit Trading - Approval Form

Although this makes a lot of sense, how are going to implement it?  We plan
to scale massively and I cannot imagine that this will be efficient enough to
facilitate the time frames and number of reference credits that we are
anticipating.  I think that we need to have a general policy that we can look
to instead of approving them on a one off basis.

Let's discuss

Tomas Valnek
19/05/2000 11:42
To: ECT London Credit Trading, Denis O'Connell/LON/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT, Edmund
Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R
Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rod Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Credit Trading - Approval Form

Attached is an Approval Form that will have to be completed to request if we
want to trade with a new counterparty or on a new reference credit. I have
incorporated comments from Origination, Credit and Legal. But should you have
any further comments please let me know ASAP, as I plan to introduce this
form by the middle of next week. (Note that there will be two forms, one for
bankruptcy swaps and one for other credit derivatives.)

Regards

Tomas


Andrew Lewis' Portfolio No. 1 at StockSelector.com
For Wednesday, June 06, 2001

To view your portfolio online, please go to
http://www.stockselector.com/portfolio.asp?portnumber=1

***********
FREE BROKER RESEARCH REPORT
Is Coke it? Coca-Cola Co. (KO) Analysts at Prudential Securities give
Coca-Cola Co. (KO) a STRONG BUY rating. Comparing the current industry slump to a similar situation in 1994, they say that the soft-drink company is
positioned to take advantage of an improved environment. Please go to
http://www.multexinvestor.com/ACHome.asp to download the free broker
research report.
***********
			Previous		Today's		Dollar		Percent
Name			Close			Close			Change		Change
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AMES DEPARTMENT	$2.68			$2.79			$0.11			4.10%
http://www.stockselector.com/quote.asp?symbol=AMES

SYNAGRO TECH IN	$2.66			$2.67			$0.01			0.38%
http://www.stockselector.com/quote.asp?symbol=SYGR

FREEREALTIME.CO	$0.04			$0.03			($0.01)		-14.29%
http://www.stockselector.com/quote.asp?symbol=FRTI

MPHASE TECH INC	$2.33			$2.31			($0.02)		-0.86%
http://www.stockselector.com/quote.asp?symbol=XDSL

STARNET COMM IN	$0.93			$0.93			$0.00			0.00%
http://www.stockselector.com/quote.asp?symbol=SNMM

TOTAL ENTERTAIN	$0.14			$0.14			$0.00			0.00%
http://www.stockselector.com/quote.asp?symbol=TTLN

SYNAGRO TECH IN	$2.66			$2.67			$0.01			0.38%
http://www.stockselector.com/quote.asp?symbol=SYGR

FCCN not found	N/A 			N/A   	N/A  	N/A
http://www.stockselector.com/quote.asp?symbol=FCCN

BEST BUY CO INC	$56.70		$58.76		$2.06			3.63%
http://www.stockselector.com/quote.asp?symbol=BBY

AMERITRADE HOLD	$8.90			$8.34			($0.56)		-6.29%
http://www.stockselector.com/quote.asp?symbol=AMTD

GIC GLOBAL INTE	$0.01			$0.01			$0.00			0.00%
http://www.stockselector.com/quote.asp?symbol=GGNC

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Portfolio Total				$11,670.10		$184.50		1.61%

	Dow Jones Indusrial Average	9,999.00		0.00			0.00%
	S & P 500				1,270.03		-13.54			-1.05%
	NASDAQ Composite			2,217.74		-15.92			-0.71%
	Russell 2000			512.58		-3.90			-0.76%
	Wilshire Index			780.76		-6.36			-0.81%

To unsubscribe or modify any other options, please go to http://www.stockselector.com/modifyportfolio.asp?symbol=1

? Copyright 1999, StockSelector.com


Selma,

I think that I was scheduled for a vaction day on Monday but I don't know because I've screwed up my vaction schedule, but I will be taking a day of vacation Monday so I can get my slate floors resealed.  If you or anyone needs me on Friday or Monday please give me a call at home.  I should be there both days and I'm only 15 minutes away.

I have nothing pending that is pressing.


Dear Steve, Rick, and Jim,

Thanks for meeting with me last Friday. I appreciate your time and candor.

I'm looking forward to working with you next spring and anytime in the
interim.

Take care,

Doug

Doug Schuler
Associate Professor of Management
Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of Management
Rice University
6100 Main Street, MS-533
Houston, TX 77005-1892 USA
office: 353 Baker Hall
tel. 713-348-5472
fax. 713-348-6296
schuler@rice.edu


---------------------- Forwarded by John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron on 08/17/2000
05:26 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Laura Valencia                           08/17/2000 05:24 PM

To: Liz M Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nicki
Daw/NA/Enron@Enron, Nancy Young/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Karen Owens/HOU/EES@EES, Kimberly Hillis/HOU/ECT@ect, Paula Austin/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Judy G Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Jennifer
Ree/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
cc: Joannie Williamson/Corp/Enron@ENRON (bcc: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron)

Subject: JP Morgan

Ladies,

Anatol Feygin, equity analyst with JP Morgan, is planning a trip to Houston
and will be bringing a group of investors to meet with Enron management.
Therefore, I would greatly appreciate your help in setting up these
meetings.
I will arrange for a conference room and would ask that you let me know your
bosses availabilty on the following dates:

September 5, 6, 15, 19, 20, 22, 26 and 29

Thank you in advance, Laura


Yes, I will be attending.

	Sheri L Cromwell
	05/19/2000 10:10 AM

		 To: Peggy Banczak/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandi M Braband/HOU/ECT@ECT, Genia
FitzGerald/HOU/ECT@ECT, James Grace/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeffrey T
Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Jeffrey/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lisa
Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Radford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Kaye Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dina Snow/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jenny
Helton/HOU/ECT@ect, Linda J Simmons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda
Whitehead/HOU/ECT@ECT, Twanda Sweet/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Make-up Class for Windows 2000

A make-up class for Windows 2000 has been scheduled for Thursday, May 25th,
from 1:30 p.m. - 3:00 p.m.  The class will be held at Three Allen Center,
3701.

Space is limited, so please let me know as soon as possible if you would like
to attend.

Thank you!

sc


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 04/04/2001
02:36 PM ---------------------------

Darnellmo@aol.com on 04/04/2001 06:45:26 AM
To: cgiron@mindspring.com, yhaynes@mindspring.com, Darron.C.Giron@enron.com,
KRISTI.GIRON@cfisd.net
cc: paulgrobasr@hotmail.com, mcnewsome@tmw.com, barbara.mcandrews@cfisd.net,
susan.cory@phschool.com
Subject: Fwd: Texans !!!

And this is from ?my Kansas brother!!!!
Return-Path: <jcmayers@earthlink.net>
Received: from  rly-yh05.mx.aol.com (rly-yh05.mail.aol.com [172.18.147.37])
by air-yh05.mail.aol.com (v77_r1.36) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Apr 2001 11:23:57
-0500
Received: from  mail1.kc.rr.com (fe1.rdc-kc.rr.com [24.94.163.48]) by
rly-yh05.mx.aol.com (v77_r1.36) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Apr 2001 11:23:31 1900
Received: from pavilion ([65.28.17.153]) by mail1.kc.rr.com  with Microsoft
SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.537.53);  Tue, 3 Apr 2001 10:20:33 -0500
Message-ID: <004d01c0bc63$0276d3e0$99111c41@kc.rr.com>
From: "Clark Mayers" <jcmayers@earthlink.net>
To: <Darnellmo@aol.com>
Subject: Texans !!!
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 10:24:59 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type:  multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_004A_01C0BC28.55F66A20"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.3018.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.3018.1300

?
Texas Baby

A Texan buys a round of drinks for all in  the bar?because, he announces
his wife has just produced "a typical  Texas baby boy weighing 25 pounds."
Congratulations shower him from all  around, and many?exclamations of
"Wow!" are heard. A woman faints due  to?sympathy pains

Two weeks later, he returns to the bar. The  bartender?says, "Say,
you're the father of the typical Texas  baby?that weighed 25 pounds at
birth. How much does he weigh now?"

The proud father answers, "Seventeen pounds."

The bartender is  puzzled, concerned. "Why? What?happened? He already
weighed 25 pounds at  birth."

The Texas father takes a slow swig from his long-neck?Lone  Star, wipes
his lips on his shirtsleeve, leans into?the bartender and  proudly
says,? "Had him circumcised."

?


David, how are we making out with this item?

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 09/06/2000
03:34 PM ---------------------------

David Oxley
09/01/2000 02:55 PM
To: Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J
Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey
McMahon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Raymond
Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Donahue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wes
Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet R
Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julia Murray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jere C
Overdyke/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Charlene Jackson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ted C Bland/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Jones/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cindy Skinner/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: ENA, EGM and EIM representation for this seasons Campus recuiting
efforts

Attached is a spreadsheet summarising the current volunteers from our
operating companies for this coming season of campus recruiting efforts for
Analysts and Associates. This information comes from the program and I am
told is accurate as of last week.

In speaking with many of you over the last few months, I believe it is fair
to say we have agreed that it is critical for the senior management team to
show their support for the program and be intimately involved in the
recruiting process for new Analysts and Associates. In particular, many of
you have remarked that we are generally short of these resources, as well as
being short of specific skills which we need either in trading, finance,
origination or assets to grow our businesses.

In this regard, having reviewed the attached I would suggest that those of
you that have not currently volunteered to join one of the school recruiting
teams as well as many of our VP's who have not done so, are encouraged to
step up immediately. In the spirit of cutting to the chase, here is my
suggested additional participation, which with your support I will forward to
Charlene's team and ask them to contact and make themselves available for the
scheduled school presentation:

Under Grad
 Florida  Colwell
Vanderbilt Ader, Beyer
Penn  Beirbach, Pagan
Michigan Burnett, Bradley
Baylor  Cocavessis
Morehouse Gomez
Uof H  Detmering
MIT  Hermans
Berkeley McDonald
NYU  Kinneman
Minnesota Ducote
Carnegie Miller

Grad Schools
UCLA  Swerzbin
Rice  Muhl, Duran
Darden  Pruett
Columbia Reck, Sharp
Georgetown Shedd
Harvard Luce, Josey
Michigan Frevert, Parquet
MIT  Tricoli, Milnthorp
Wharton Kitagawa, Malcolm
Vanderbilt McClellan, Oxley

Let me know if you think any of these are inappropriate. I will update this
based on any feedback and contact the individuals directly early next week to
let them know we would appreciate their help in these efforts.

David


--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MHEARD>
To: Allen, Kimberly </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Gwaddr/cn=PSC.PS1.Kimberly Allen>, Anderson, Diane </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Danders2>, Bailey, Susan </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Sbaile2>, Bell, Jean </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Jbell>, Bowen, Bob </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Bbowen>, Boyd, Samantha </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Sboyd2>, Brackett, Debbie R. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Dbracke>, Bradford, William S. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Wbradfo>, Brown, Angela Y. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Abrown8>, Campos, Anthony </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Acampos>, Cason, Sharen </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Scason>, Cisneros, Celeste </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Ccisnero>, Conwell, Wendy </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Wconwell>, Cook, Mary </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Mcook>, Crawford, Sharon </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Scrawfo3>, Curry, Ken </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Kcurry>, Ebow, Amber </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Aebow>, Ellstrom, Diane </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Dellstr>, Espinoza, Veronica </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Vespino>, Fischer, Jason </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Jfische2>, Garcia, Jorge A.  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Jgarci11>, Gerard, Camille </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Cgerard>, Gonzalez, Veronica </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Vgonza2>, Gray, Barbara N. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Bgray>, Hare, Bill D. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Bhare>, Heaney, Gordon </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Gheaney>, Hendry, Brent </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Bhendry>, Hundl, Kimberly </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Khundl>, Johnson, Cheryl </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Cjohnso5>, Johnson, Rudwell </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rjohnso2>, Jones, Tana </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Tjones>, Koehler, Anne C. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Akoehle>, Lambert, Karen </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Klamber>, Landau, Georgi </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Glandau>, Landry, Shemeika S. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Slandry>, Lebrocq, Wendi </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Wlebrocq>, Lees, Lisa </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Llees>, Leite, Francisco Pinto </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Fleite>, Mendoza, Nidia </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Nmartin>, Monterrey, Maribel </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Mmonterr>, Moore, Jason </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Jmoore1>, Moran, Tom </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Tmoran>, Mulvany, Patrick </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Pmulvany>, Murphy, Melissa Ann </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Mmurphy>, Nelson, Cheryl </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Cnelson4>, Neuner, Dale </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Dneuner>, Ngo, Tracy </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Tngo>, Ornelas, Bianca </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Bornelas>, Otto, Randy </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rotto>, Panus, Stephanie </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Spanus>, Piwetz, Stephanie </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Spiwetz>, Radous, Paul </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Pradous>, Rajaram, Aparna </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Arajaram>, Reeves, Leslie </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Lreeves>, Richardson, Stacey </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Srichar2>, Rodriguez, Bernice </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Brodrig>, Rodriguez, Melissa </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Mrodrig3>, Rohauer, Tanya </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Trohaue>, Sacks, Edward </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Esacks>, Sayre, Frank </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Fsayre>, Schott, Samuel </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Sschott>, Seib, Dianne </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Dseib>, Sever, Stephanie </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Ssever>, Shackleton, Sara </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Sshackl>, Shivers, Lynn </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=LSHIVER>, Sietzema, Linda </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Lsietze>, Sonnonstine, Max </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Msonnons>, Southard, Carrie </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=CSOUTHA>, Taylor, Mark E (Legal) </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Mtaylo1>, Theriot, Kim S. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Ktherio>, Vanek, Darren </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Dvanek>, Williams, Jason R (Credit) </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Jwilli10>
Date: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 3:05:31 GMT
Subject:

We have received an executed Fourth Amendment to Master Energy Price Swap Agreement dated as of October 26, 2001 between Enron North America Corp. and Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc., which amends the definition of "Exposure Threshold".

Copies will be distributed.


no I dont know how it works, and who told you

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:10 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

don't you have messenger

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:09 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

nobody told you, dont lie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:08 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

damn you caught me.  and for your information, i didn't notice it...someone told me about it!  so whatever to you mr. allergy man!!!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:07 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:

if you werent always staring at me you wouldnt notice my eyes


Holli:

Please verify that the earliest TRADE DATE with EWEB was October 30, 2000
(which was approved by the EWEB Board on October 3, 2000 according to the
December 5, 2000 resolution).  I have a copy of the resolution.  Thanks.
Sara


I see you two are on the Reliant agreement.  Deedy Russo, who is manager of
contracts at Reliant, asked if we could contact them about getting an ISDA
Master in place to replace the old ERMS Agreement.  She siad we should
contact Janna Lynn Galloway, a paralegal there.  Her number is 713/207-5893.


I always have time for lunch!  I will ask my assistant to call you to set
something up.  Thanks for your note.  --Sally


Oops - here you go - FYI
----- Forwarded by Meredith Philipp/Corp/Enron on 10/09/2000 12:16 PM -----

	Meredith Philipp
	10/09/2000 12:16 PM

		 To: Kenneth Lay/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bobbie
Power/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Remarks for 1:30 Press Conference


Michelle Lokay,

If you were not on the earlier email of TPC pairings, you should find your
name here.  THIS IS FOR THE GOLF EVENT ONLY!  This list reflects who is
registered as of this time, and it will be updated and reposted on Friday,
October 13.  PLEASE DO NOT CALL IF YOU HAVE SENT IN YOUR INFORMATION AND DO
NOT SEE YOUR NAME ON THIS LIST.  If it does not appear on Friday's list, THEN
CALL.

These golfers will report to the main country club at the Woodlands.  The
Oaks Course was formerly the West Course.  Registration and lunch at 11:30
a.m.; tee off 1:30 p.m  Again, the format is PAR AS YOUR FRIEND.

Team Number and Tee Assignments:

#1 - Jay Surles, Richard Robert, Brent Caperton, Phil Vance
#2A - Don Fowler, Chris Hoekenga, David Culp, Steve Stands
#2B - Pam Leigh, Joe O'Hara, Kenneth Sparks, Louis Cox
#3A - Steve Christenson, Kevin Lower, Larry Bryan, George Fritz
#3B - Mark Knippa, Mark Courtney, Fred Wass, Don Whittington
#4A - Kathleen DuPont, Bob Dunn, Steve Lehew, Joe Psencik
#4B - Mark Humphries, Mike Bradley, Keith Thibodeaux, Jack Walker
#5A - Steve Haywood, Ellen Herminghaus, Tim Brennan, Greg Downum
#5B - Bill Thompson, John Fogg, Jan Rogers, Kent Glover
#6A - Steve Adamcik, Mark Miller, Tom Strickland, Ed Jaroch
#6B - Bill Nicas, Larry Mundt, Cheryl White, Scott Southard
#7A - Chad Alexander, Richard Gutierrez, Bill Hebenstreit, Matt Johnson
#7B - Matt Moczygemba, Pete Brastrom, Randy Ward, Mark Houldsworth
#8A - Gene Adams, Mark Ingram, AV Rao, Willie Underwood
#8B - Selena Plentl, Mark Hillegeist, Tim Powell, Tony Gant
#9 - John Potter, Albert McConnell, Surinder Dhamija, Joe Wood
#10A - Aimee Donnel, Jerry Verbout, Rick Miles, Steve McCord
#10B - Joe Stepenovich, Jim Hart, Mark Walsh, Kay Muenster
#11A - Mark Fuqua, P.D. Leonard, Gary Potter, Sylvia Reza
#11B - Chip Berthelot, Mike Barzyk, Joe Wardinski, Bryan McCollum
#12 - Jon Wright, William Meyers, Paul VanderLinden, David Brown
#13 - Craig Wilkinson, Bruce Henderson, Scott Rech, Glenn Shearer
#14A - Mark Bounds, YJ Bourgeois, Ricky Henegan, Randy Bartemeyer
#14B - Greg Hopper, Eric Graff, Tommy Jacomini, Duncan Rhodes
#15A - Joe Bruskotter, Denise Woods, Todd Gibson, Robert Moore
#15B - Janice Felton, Judy Smith, Rose Litvik, Veronica Rose
#16A - Tim Barth, Karl Klanke, Leo Williams, Dave Childs
#16B - Jim Adams, Gary Lamphier, Mike Morris, John Ripple
#17 - Rod Banks, Greg Harless, Landy Roberson, Mike Harrington

REMEMBER, these pairings could change by Friday.  Please DO NOT CALL THE HEA
OFFICE until you DO NOT see your name on Friday's email!  Thanks for your
cooperation.

-----------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent by:

Teresa Knight, Executive Director
Houston Energy Association (HEA)
Phone: (713) 651-0551
Fax for HEA: (713) 659-6424
tknight@houstonenergy.org

If you would like to have your email address removed from our mailing list,
please click the link below to the HEA Home page, where you will find a
mini-form to remove your name automatically.

http://www.houstonenergy.org/

If you did not receive the attached file or it was corrupted, you can find it
at: http://www.houstonenergy.org/public/


Hi Everyone,

This Wednesday, November 1, Dean Tyson will be hosting the second Dean's
Dinner during the 7:30 - 8:15 break.  There's room for 15 people, and it's
a great opportunity to talk with Deans Tyson and Shogan on an informal basis.

Please let me know via e-mail if you're interested in joining us!
First-come, first-served.

Cheers,

Diane


Ken -- Continental Airlines magazine is doing a cover story on you for their
April issue.  The interview is scheduled for Nov. 30.   I've scheduled a
photo shoot for you on Dec. 8 in the office, but since they'll need several
photos for the article, the photographer has asked if you're willing to have
your photo taken in your home, as well.   If not, do you have any suggestions
for alternate locations?  They're looking for a natural, comfortable setting.

Please let me know.  Thank you.
Karen


Can you do lunch on Thursday?  Just for fun, but to also pick your brain
about roses.

Joannie


Vlady,

Here is the P&L breakout you requested.  If you have any questions give me a
call.

Robin
x57478


Craig Gannet reports:

 I talked to Rich Glick this morning about the rumored
Administration rulemaking on reliability.  Rich said that it will be a
notice of inquiry, not a proposed rulemaking.  The NOI will essentially ask
three questions: (1) should DOE issue a proposed rule? (2) Does DOE have the
legal authority to do so?  (3)  if DOE should issue a rule and has the
authority to do so, what should be included in the rule?  The NOI will not
contain any proposed language.  The comment period will be 45 days, and Rich
does not expect this Adminstration to act on this issue.  In effect, he
said, they are simply teeing the issue up for the next Administration.
(This assumes that the pending reliability legislation is not passed during
the upcoming lame duck session, which I think is a pretty safe assumption.)
Rich said that the NOI is on Secretary Richardson's desk, and is likely to
be signed tomorrow.


Attached is an updated copy of ENA's Litigation Status Report.


Bilateral NDA and we're discussing the basic broker client deal like we've
done for United Fuels, RedMeteor etc.

Thanks,

Dan


Hey guys, I am looking for NYSEG TCO gas.    I believe the correct Op area
etc.
is as follows:  Op2 Mkt 20  MLI 21

I need approximately 300 dth/day for 1/28 - 1/31.

Thanks!


Sorry for the delay - it's taken me a while to track down the answer to this,
because Chris Foster, the trader on this deal, is still unclear as to the
answer. Basically, the deal keeps getting cut by the Cal-ISO, which is why
Carla goes in and changes the volumes sometimes. But Chris thinks that in the
end we might not be cutting the deal financially, just physically on a
day-by-day basis. Given that, we only need the first, original confirm sent
out - if revised confirms have been sent, let's go ahead and send them the
original one and leave it at that.

Chris Foster said he would get back with me this afternoon - he's meeting
with Real Time and Schedulers right now to sort out this issue.  I apologize
that this wasn't more clear before. Should I add a note in the comments
section of this deal to clarify? Or should I just check the deal back to "no
confirm"? Let me know.

Thanks,
Kate

	From:  Sharen Cason                           01/24/2001 08:14 AM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: #500966

This is the deal that was originally in as not to be confirmed and was
changed to be confirmed.  Well, I have confirmed twice because it keeps going
into pending status.   The auditor indictes that carla is going into the deal
and changing something that causes it to go into pending.  Can you check into
this and find out what she is changing, if we need to keep sending revised
confirmations, wha'sssss uuup with this deal?

Thanks!


Mary:  Attached is an early draft of notice which I had prepared for the
AVICI swap.  I thnk we may changed the Termination provision of the confirm
shortly after this was drafted.  Hope this helps.  Sara


---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 01/12/2001
07:20 AM ---------------------------

Alan Comnes@ECT
01/11/2001 09:45 PM
To: richard.shapiro@enron.com, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron,
rosalee.fleming@enron.com, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristian J Lande/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Price Curve Changes

Rich Shapiro requested this chart for Ken Lay.

Thanks for Kristian for doing the heavy lifting.

I have spruced up the chart a bit and turned into a Power Point chart.  Open
the .xls file only if you want to modify the source data.

Alan Comnes


Thanks Mona, good summary.  I would like to discuss making the following
proposals to the commission:

1)  Require PG&E to submit their evaluation criteria and weighting in advance
of the auction.  This will help eliminate any subjectivity that favors their
affiliate.  If the commission is interested in a fair auction with no
preference given to pge gen, this request should be hard to argue with.  It
may also give us information about how they will try to move this process in
pge gen's favor.  It also gives us a platform to debate the auction process
and gain some additional concessions.

2)  Propose that any negative tax ramifications for ratepayers and state
residents resulting from a sale to the affiliate should be factored out of
the affiliate's bid.  This will create a more level playing field and
maximize the value to ratepayers.  We may want to get Arthur Anderson
involved in helping with this assessment.

3)  Have the bids independently evaluated by one or more third parties
selected by consensus of the interested parties.

Also, are there any market power issues with the affiliate owning this much
generation in the utility service area?  How could the affiliate
theoretically abuse this generation to benefit the utility or PG&E corp?
These issues should also be highlighted in any filing.

The outcome of this auction is extremely important to EES.  We stand to make
considerably more money the higher the sale price.  From my perspective, it's
a top priority for us to apply whatever resources are needed to ensure a fair
auction.  The other factor to consider is time, which works against us.

I would appreciate discussing our plan of action in this proceeding.  If we
need to develop a plan, we are more than happy to help.

Mike

Mona L Petrochko
10/04/99 08:07 PM
To: Mike Harris/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Greg Cordell/HOU/EES@EES, Jeff
Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Paul Kaufman, Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Sandra
McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES
Subject: Re: hydro auction

The question is legitimate.  With the potential for exchanges among
affiliates being very real, the only possible solution is to either prohibit
affiliate participation or make iron-clad the confidentiality/non-disclosure
agreement.  Of course, once you allow the affiliate to participate, being
able to determine if an "inappropriate" transfer of information has occurred
is almost impossible.  The other problem is that Enron has been an advocate
of affiliate participation in the sale of assets, as long as the relationship
was arms-length and no preferential treatment was provided.  As proposed,
PG&E states that its affiliate will be treated the same as other bidders.
So, I think that leaves us with buttressing the proposed confidentiality
language to prevent such exchanges as much as possible.

We would also have to assume, for the information to be beneficial to PG&E's
affiliate, that it would result in PG&E Gen obtaining the assets.  As
proposed by PG&E, they would have to be the highest bidder, taking into
consideration certain tax benefits associated with the sale to an affiliate
(PG&E's proposal, not my assessment).  In other words, PG&E claims that the
ultimate determination of the winning bidder is price.  If the result was
that PG&E Gen paid more for these assets than anyone else, it becomes a
little more difficult to claim that the auction was unfair.

However, I believe that the ultimate determination is price, with a caveat.
The caveat is acceptance by PG&E of amendments to the attached service
agreements.  PG&E allows for bidders to submit amendments to the service
agreements, but PG&E retains the right to reject the amendments if not
acceptable to them.  PG&E Gen may know what amendments are and are not
acceptable.  That may be the inside track for the affiliate.  But again, I
think it brings us back to ensuring equitable treatment as much as possible
in the auction protocol rather than preventing PG&E Gen from participating.

If you feel this is not adequate, please let me know.

	Enron Energy Services

	From:  Mike Harris                           10/04/99 04:42 PM
	Phone No: 713 853-6091

To: Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES
cc: Dennis Benevides, Greg Cordell/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: hydro auction

Mona,
Jeff pointed me to you.  Below are some concerns I have on the PG&E hydro
auction.  What are your thoughts on the opportunity for PG&E Gen to adversely
affect the auction outcome through access to non-public information?  Also,
how strong are the mitigants against this behavior?

Mike
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Harris/HOU/EES on 10/04/99 06:40 PM
---------------------------

	Enron Energy Services

	From:  Mike Harris                           10/04/99 06:32 PM
	Phone No: 713 853-6091

To: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: hydro auction

Jeff,
Who is handling the PG&E hydro auction?

I have a concern about PG&E Generation's participation in this auction.
Every press release from PG&E on this topic goes out of its way to state that
PG&E Gen will be a bidder.  My concern is their access to non-public
information and how this may skew the results of the auction.  If you're the
person on this, let's talk.  If not, pls let me know who is.  Hope you're
doing well.

Mike


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 10/25/2000
03:29 PM ---------------------------

Maureen Raymond@ENRON
10/25/2000 02:58 PM
Sent by: Gwyn Koepke@ENRON
To: John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Larry Lawyer/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike
McCullough/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc: Bob Schorr/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: E-strategy for metals trading

Attached is an article from yesterday's FT regarding the efforts by a
consortia of four major international metals and mining producers to develop
an internet marketplace for producers and consumers.  As we come across this
type of information to keep you abreast of developments in the commodity
markets, we will pass it along.

Maureen Raymond-Castaneda


Dear CEO Kenneth Lay:

The conversion rate of .15 is not acceptable to shareholders. It should be
at least .2 or above. We need to get bidders and more banks to back up Enron
while talking to Dynergy. .15 ratio was proposed by some analysts who short
the ENE stocks when the price was at above $9. The number .15 was published
in media again last week or so. ENE should not take this outrage number.
These hedge fund and short sellers will be happy if the ratio is .15. I
think .2 ratio is our bottom line.

May god gives you wisdom.

Peter


Thanks.

	Frank W Vickers@ECT
	12/29/2000 12:46 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Terry Donovan
		 Subject: Response

Jeff, we need to add some discussion focused on QF issues in California and
how resolution to certain items would enhance QF ownership and provide the
utilities with optimal performance of the QF's and perhaps encourage new
capacity development at existing QF locations.

The utilities should be motivated to enter into buyout, buydown, blend and
extend, negotiate fixed energy prices and other restructuring transactions
with the QF's.
The utilites have the ability to hedge the floating price currently being
paid to the QF's.  They should be motivated to look into these structures.
Utilities should provide some clarification to the energy prices under QF
PPA's.  There is alot of risks around SRAC and PX that affect both the
utilities and the QF owners.  It seems like resolution to that risk is
beneficial to both the utility as well as the QF.
QF's should have the ability to move excess capacity and energy into either
the market and/or to the utility.  That  would create additional economic
incentives for the QF's to run and perhaps increase their capacity.

Frank


We believe it will be done the 14th.  There is some discussion about having
that group first, but not sure that will be approved by Hannon and Rice.  It
is again being held at the 4 Seasons.

	Rod Hayslett@ENRON
	10/13/00 11:12 AM

		 To: Crissy Collett/Enron Communications@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
		 cc: Marla Barnard/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 Subject: Re: Year End PRC

Do you know on which date you will be doing the VP's?

From: Crissy Collett@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS on 10/13/2000 09:00 AM
To: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON
cc: Marla Barnard/Enron Communications@Enron Communications

Subject: Re: Year End PRC

Rod,

EBS is holding the following dates for year end PRC meetings:  December 13, 14

RGD/Crissy Collett

	Rod Hayslett@ENRON
	10/13/00 06:54 AM

		 To: Scott Yeager/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Richard
DiMichele/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: Year End PRC

Do you have a date set for your year end PRC yet?


UserName: CAMPB54792

You have an electronic trade confirmation in your Inbox.  To retrieve your
trade confirmation you may login to Datek Online and choose Document Delivery
from the Account Services menu, or you may click on the link below:

https://tumble2.datek.com/posta?x=1-5547014-5523779-KDEPZ67Z

You have received this message because you subscribed to electronic delivery
for your Datek Online account.  If you wish to stop receiving account
documents via electronic delivery, you may cancel your subscription by
logging into Datek Online and choosing "Settings" from the
Account Services menu.

For more information please call Customer Support at 1-888-U2-DATEK, or send
email to support@datek.com.

Thank you for trading with us.

Datek Online Brokerage Services
Member NASD / SIPC


we might need to hit his parents up for some of those, this may sound gay,
but I'll bet they would like it, we could give it to them as a present, a
video slide show of Max and Jen growing up and meeting.  Their parents might
already be doing this but they did it at Josh and Lisa's (cousin) wedding
and it was cool.

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 11:14 AM
To: merlinm@uswest.net
Cc: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com; merlinm@uswest.net;
pederleifkjeseth@hotmail.com; ralee@rmi.net; Morrill, Scott
Subject: Re: Jen and Max!!!!

does anyone have a picture of max when he used to walk around and flex his
pecs?


I understand Greg Penman has inquired for the same.  I would be happy to
coordinate amongst us and informed Greg accordingly.

Thank you
Molly

Molly Harris
08/18/2000 01:58 PM
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: ENA ISDA with PEC

Tana

Is it possible to get electronic file for the Enron North America and Peoples
Energy Corporation ISDA?  Is it in Word?  I am trying to get our new JV,
Midwest Energy Hub, to utilize our format for the template for MEH.

Thanks
Molly

a.huprikar@pecorp.com on 08/17/2000 03:48:36 PM
To: molly.harris@enron.com
cc:
Subject: ENA ISDA with PEC

Molly,

Could you send me an electronic version of the ISDA that was signed between
ENA and PEC. I understand from our attorney that we did not work with an
electronic version, only a hard copy. In order to create an ISDA template
for MEH, I need the electronic version.

Thanks

Aparna

----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person
or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential
and/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in
reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient is prohibited.   If you received this in error, please
contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.


Fallon, DiMichele, Pearce, Todd Hall, Kent Castleman, Kevin Sweeney, Shonna Wilson, Jeff Gossett, Scott Mills, Stacy White, Kristin Albrecht

Topic:  DPR for 11/30 and subsequent dates


hallux (HAL-uhks) noun, plural halluces (HAL-yuh-seez)

   Big toe. More generally, the innermost digit on the hind foot of animals.
   It is usually backward-directed in birds.

[From Late Latin hallux, from Latin hallus, similar to pollex, thumb.]

   "Where in the human body would you find the hallux?"
   Roger Perkins, The Quiz, The Daily Telegraph (UK), Dec 27, 1997.

This week's theme: words to describe odds and ends.

............................................................................
Authority without wisdom is like a heavy axe without an edge, fitter to
bruise than polish. -Anne Bradstreet, poet (1612-1672)

What to give to those who have everything? Give the gift of words.
Here is a gift that keeps on giving. To enter a gift subscription of
A.Word.A.Day, please visit http://wordsmith.org/awad/gift.html or ask
them to subscribe themselves at http://wordsmith.org/awad/subscribe.html

Pronunciation:
http://wordsmith.org/words/hallux.wav
http://wordsmith.org/words/hallux.ram


This deal has an NP15 delivery point with firm energy.

Thanks!


weather moderating, enuf switching to offset hdds, cash showing same, i wudnt
touch it ...yet


We have secured a phone bridge to listen to the special FERC meeting being
held on Friday, Dec. 15th.

I have reserved the Cascade Conference Room for the call.

Please call me Thursday if you have any questions, or see Mary Hain today.

Thank you.

Lysa
x7927


Doug:

Thank you for your e-mail updating us on the Ripley Campus Grand Opening
events.    I have purchased a table at the Wednesday, April 11, HEART OF GOLD
CELEBRATION  luncheon at the Wortham Center, and my wife and I will be
attending.

However, I am unable to attend any of the other events due to my busy work
schedule.

Tell Angela I look forward to seeing her at the HEART OF GOLD CELEBRATION
luncheon on the 11th.

Thanks,
Stan Horton


Mike, for your info... we just received this message from IGS re: DWR purchases.  As previously discussed seeing the DWR rfp will require some credit and contract enhancements and that process is underway but it is moving slower and with less push than I would like... For sure, there are alot of hurdles...

It is our opinion that any transactions that are being done by the DWR with third parties are relatively short dated..  1 month, 2 month etc.. but we will keep you posted as we move forward.

BT

-----Original Message-----
From: bbuxa [mailto:bbuxa@igservice.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:07 PM
To: Tycholiz, Barry
Cc: Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Subject: Status Update?

Barry,

Interstate Gas Services, on behalf of the DWR, will be soliciting bids for
gas supply.  We are currently contemplating limited gas purchases, and would
like to get a GISB in place.  We would like to do a quick follow up in
regards to the status of the GISB contract between yourselves and the
Department of Water Resources.  If your legal department has any questions
or concerns, please contact Mark Baldwin of Interstate Gas Services at
925-243-0350.

To address any credit concerns you may have, the department is currently
preparing a complete credit package which we will forward to you upon its
completion.

Again, please do not hesitate to call.

Thank You,
Brenda Buxa
Contract Administration
Interstate Gas Services
925-243-0350


Madhur and Aaron:  I am waiting for a response from  credit.
Aaron:  You had me confused because you kept referring to Morgan Stanley who
we are negotiating with on the equity side.  Who negotiated the
Enroncredit.com ISDA?
So, this party trades FX and credit?

Sara

	Madhur Dayal
	09/22/2000 04:51 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: ISDA Master Agreement bet. Morgan Guaranty and Enron North America

Sara,

Do you know where we stand on an ISDA agreement with JP morgan.  We need one
for Enron North America.

---------------------- Forwarded by Madhur Dayal/HOU/ECT on 22/09/2000 16:48
---------------------------

	From:  Nicholas J Stephan                           21/09/2000 15:13

To: Madhur Dayal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: ISDA Master Agreement bet. Morgan Guaranty and Enron North America

---------------------- Forwarded by Nicholas J Stephan/LON/ECT on 21/09/2000
15:15 ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Michael Stolfi" <stolfi_michael@jpmorgan.com>
  21/09/2000 21:11

To: nicholas.j.stephan@enron.com
cc: "Thomas R Bumbolow" <bumbolow_thomas@jpmorgan.com>, "Sanjeev X Puri"
<puri_sanjeev@jpmorgan.com>

Subject: ISDA Master Agreement bet. Morgan Guaranty and Enron North America

Nicholas:

Henry Steuart asked me to forward to your attention the revised draft ISDA
Schedule which I previously sent to Ms. Flynn. As I mentioned in my last note
to
Ms. Flynn, the attached draft incorporates all of Morgan's comments and should
be self-explanatory. The motivation behind many of our comments was a
conscious
effort to keep the credit terms nearly identical to those already agreed to
with
other Enron entities.

Please review the attached and feel free to call, fax or e-mail me with any
questions or comments.

Sincerely yours,
Mike Stolfi
212-648-8231
212-648-5125 fax

(See attached file: Enron North America - MAS#3.doc)(See attached file: Enron
North America - MAS#3(blined).doc)

 - Enron North America - MAS#3.doc
 - Enron North America - MAS#3(blined).doc


Sell.

Cameron Sellers <cameron@perfect.com> on 08/31/2000 03:07:36 PM
To: "'jdasovic@enron.com'" <jdasovic@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE:

Oh yeah.  That too.

Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT.COM
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
cameron@perfect.com
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)

 -----Original Message-----
From:  jdasovic@enron.com [mailto:jdasovic@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2000 1:03 PM
To: cameron@perfect.com
Subject: RE:

Hopefully you mean "buy?"

Cameron Sellers <cameron@perfect.com> on 08/31/2000 02:50:39 PM

To:   "'Jeff Dasovich'" <jdasovic@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  RE:

Hee, hee.  They are in our offices as we speak (type).  Discussing
integration.  Oh yeah.

Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT.COM
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
cameron@perfect.com
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)

 -----Original Message-----
From:     Jeff Dasovich [mailto:jdasovic@enron.com]
Sent:     Thursday, August 31, 2000 12:43 PM
To:  cameron@perfect.com
Subject:

I assume, since C1's stock rose 10 points yesterday, that you struck a deal
with
them!


This is a company 011 funded project that you approved originally.  It is to
be allocated/amortized according to the usual MSA allocation which goes to
virtually all of the Enron business units.


Ken and Greg,

What we have been doing is absoutely fine under the assumption that the market
conditions move relatively small ( where Taylor series has fast convergence).
However, we could run into troubles when the market has a big move.

In order to have a error proof bucketing, we can use the following
method(finite-difference), let me
know what you guys think how to implement it to the transport book.

Sensitivity to risk parameters, or P/L attribution by risk bucket:

Today's premium = Premium based on today's curves

Last day's premium = Premium based on last day's curves

Change due to
DeliveryCurveShift = [Premium based on today's delivery price and last day's
receipt  price, volatilities, interest rate, last's time to expiration etc] -
Last day's premium - today's change due to Gamma1

ReceiptCurveShift = [Premium based on today's receipt price and last day's
everything else] - Last day's premium -today's change due to Gamma2

Vega1 = [Premium based on today's delivery volatility and last day's
everything else] - Last day's premium

Vega2 = as above for gas volatility

Rho =  as above for interest rate

Eta = as above for correlation

Theta = {[Premium based on today's days to expiration and last day's
everything else] - Drift - Last day's premium } / 365.25

[This is a daily Theta.The sprdopt function returns an annualised theta.]

Gamma1 = 0.5 Last day's Gamma1' * PriceShift1 2??Gamma2 = 0.5 Last day's Gamma2' * PriceShift2 2

Drift = [(exp (Last day's interest rate*(Today - Last days) /365.25)) - 1 ]*
Last day's premium

Priceshift1 = Today's delivery price - Last day's delivery price

Priceshift2 = Today's receipt price - Last day's receipt price

Gamma1' = theoretical Gamma1, i.e. gamma from spread option

Gamma2' = theoretical Gamma2, i.e. gamma from spread option calculation

Liquidation= Premium of option which expired the day before, i.e. intrinsic
value.


pls print with emails.  thanks df
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 03/20/2001
04:36 PM ---------------------------
From: Michael P Moran/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/20/2001 01:59 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: FW: ETS Approval Authorization Policy

You probably need to look at this.This only addresses expenditure approval
and does not address "execution" authority. Sometimes non VPs believe that if
they can approve the expenditure then they can sign contracts in connection
with the expenditure even in the absence of a power of attorney. Accordingly
it might be wise to expand the "Delegation" section of this policy.
 -----Original Message-----
From:  Hayslett, Rod
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 1:53 PM
To: Cordes, Bill; Corman, Shelley; Gibbs, Dana; Horton, Stanley; Hotte,
Steve; Kinningham, Laura; Lowry, Phil; McCarty, Danny; Meyer, Rockford;
Moran, Michael P.; Prentice, James; Smith, Gary; White, Julia
Cc: Ackley, Earlene; Alder, Amelia; Armstrong, Julie; Hogan, Janice; Houser,
Rita; Jolibois, Anne; Mann, Ruth; O'Neill, Virginia; Perry, Carolyn; Sellers,
Emily; Stark, Cindy; Winters, Ricki
Subject: FW: ETS Approval Authorization Policy

Please review and provide comments to myself and/or Lisa Sutton.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Sutton, Lisa
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 10:36 AM
To: Hayslett, Rod; Saunders, James; Peters, Jerry; Jesse, John; Borcyk,
David; Cherry, Paul; Brassfield, Morris; Fenstad, Larry; Brasher, Barney;
Clements, David; Concklin, Elaine; Chandler, Bob; Cobb, John; Wiederholt,
Patricia; Fancler, Dan; Lev, Jennifer; Geaccone, Tracy; Gilbert, Steve;
Keiser, John; Meers, Thomas; Barnes, Caroline; Stern, Ellis
Subject: ETS Approval Authorization Policy

FYI, based on comments received, attached is the draft which will be
distributed to Stan's direct reports for comments. We plan to have the policy
in place before the end of March.


Jim, would it be logical to go back to March 27 (or whatever the date of the order was made that made this permanent).  And I'm not sure how it could hurt us with our customers.  They have a fixed price contract.  We absorbed this charge.  Wouldn't the refund be ours?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Thursday, August 02, 2001 8:16 AM
To:	Williams, Robert C.
Subject:	RE: Discussion of California Background & Issues

Bob --

For certain we are seeking to not have the 1 c/kwh Surcharge post March 2002.  I think that I would be happy to begin to try and get the CPUC to modify their Order right now, but my real concern (maybe unfounded) is that we don't want the CPUC to go all the way back to Jan 4 and refund the 1c/kwh to Direct Access customers.  I thought this would harm EES given our de-dasr activities?  This is what I mean by "finessing" the issue too much.  The only legitimate positions are no application back to Jan 4 or to fight for a clean-up after the retail rate freeze ends.

I make this based on the following.  First, it is hard for EES to push much at the CPUC.  Second, after the CPUC takes what will be a potentially direct access killing action on Aug 23, I don't think they are going to be interested in dealing with a "detail" that matters for only for direct access customers.  Finally, I need to understand the value of this effort in line with the other key value drivers - and also, are you completely sure that there isn't a change (however unforseen) that could hurt another of our positions.  Let's not create a fuss if the outcome could be harmful.

I'm ready to push for this, but I want to make sure that everyone on the business side understands the issues.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Williams, Robert C.
Sent:	Wednesday, August 01, 2001 7:41 PM
To:	Steffes, James D.
Subject:	RE: Discussion of California Background & Issues

Jim, first let me say that this is great for someone like me who is relatively new to California.  Next, with respect to item 6, this implies to me that we are not seeking relief from  the 1 cent except for the post-March 2002 time period.  Have I misread this?  Also, I don't think a ruling by the Commission either way could negatively affect our "tax" argument.  I view them as alternative ways to get to the same point.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Wednesday, August 01, 2001 5:53 PM
To:	Whalley, Greg; Delainey, David; Lavorato, John; Dietrich, Janet; Leff, Dan; Sharp, Vicki; Haedicke, Mark E.; Sanders, Richard B.; Williams, Robert C.; Curry, Wanda; Black, Don; Belden, Tim; Swain, Steve; Tribolet, Michael; Kingerski, Harry; Shapiro, Richard; Kean, Steven J.; Stoness, Scott
Cc:	Kaufman, Paul; Mara, Susan; Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	Discussion of California Background & Issues

Attached please find the write-up on California.

The paper includes four sections - (1) Background & Status, (2) Upcoming Issues & Recommendations, (3) Legislative and Regulatory History of California Restructuring, and (4) Summary of PG&E - Enron Correspondence on Payment of Negative CTC.

We have also pulled together most of the primary documents (CPUC Orders, Legislation, etc.) that are discussed in this paper.  This material is quite lengthy and if anyone wants a copy, please let me know (I intend to send one to Tim Belden/Steve Swain).

If we need to hold a meeting to discuss any of this, I'll be happy to set something up for tomorrow.

Thanks,

Jim

 << File: Background on California Restructuring.doc >>


The report named: Power East P/L <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=17&report_name=Power+East+P/L&category_cd=5&category_name=EAST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=5&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=10/24/2001>, published as of 10/24/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.

(Revision: 2)


Please approve the following product type in Datamanager after 11:00 a.m.
See the steps for approval below.

US Steel Hot Rolled Plate Fin Swap

Website Short Description of Product Type:  US HR Plate Swap    ("US Steel
Hot Rolled Plate Fin Swap" - #2069)

Product Type:
A U.S. Hot Rolled Steel Plate financial Swap Transaction with Enron North
America Corp. under which the Seller pays a Floating Price and the Buyer pays
the price submitted by the Counterparty on the Website (the Fixed Price) in
each case in respect of the Notional Quantity per Determination Period.  Each
calendar month during the Term of the Transaction will be a Determination
Period; provided that, if the Term of the Transaction is less than one
calendar month the Determination Period shall be the Term of the
Transaction.  The Notional Quantity per Determination Period shall be the
volume submitted by the Counterparty via the Website.  The Payment Date(s)
will be 5 business days after the Floating Price is determinable.  The
Floating Price shall be the Index for the relevant Determination Period.

Reference Period:
The term of the Transaction shall be from the Effective Date to the
Termination Date.  The Effective Date is _______and the Termination Date is
____________.

Product Additional Information (example):
The Index for a Determination Period shall be the average price for
"Domestic, Midwest Plate ($/net ton)" in the table "US Current & Forecast
Prices" under the current month's heading in the monthly issue of MBR (Metal
Bulletin Research) North American Steel Markets Monthly with the published
month the same as the Determination Period.

Currency:
The price is quoted in US Dollars per unit of volume, which will be the
Contractual Currency.

Unit of Measure:
The unit of measure against which the price is quoted shall be net tons (2000
lbs) and the quantity shown shall be in net tons per month.

The financial GTC's are attached as follows:

STEPS FOR APPROVAL:

click the  START button
select  PROGRAMS
select  TEST APPLICATIONS
select ENRONONLINE CLUSTER(PROD)
 PROCEED WITH USUAL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click the Enron Online Production Cluster "START" button
select EnronOnLine (this is the EOL Datamanager)
 PROCEED WITH EOL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click on the "+" for EnronOnLine
click on the "+" for Product Types
click on the "+" for "Awaiting Approval" (OR  "Partially Approved")
select the product requiring review as stated in e-mail above
Right "mouse" click on "properties" to view product set-up
TO APPROVE:  Right mouse click on "Approved"


Suz,

Please print four sets of originals of each of the documents you faxed this
am (name in footers).

Thanks,

Kay


Attached is PIRA's latest "Electricity Daily Demand Forecast."

If you have any questions regarding the report's content, please contact
Morris Greenberg (email: morris@pira.com) or Victoria Watkins (email:
vwatkins@pira.com), at (212) 686-6808.

Contact Client Services regarding PIRA report distribution and address
changes at (212) 686-6808, email: support@pira.com.

NOTE: Circulation of the "Electricity Daily Demand Forecast" outside a
Client's licensed distribution area is strictly prohibited. Clients that
are unsure of their licensed distribution or require an extension of
their current license should contact their PIRA sales representative, or
email to sales@pira.com.

PIRA Energy Group

 - ed121001.pdf
 - ed121001.xls


Greetings:
Could you email me the final version of the stipulation.  Thanks a lot.

Best,
Jeff


Importance:  High
---------------------------------

Here is my list of some of the projects/contracts Andrea and I are involved
in or working on (recent comments are in bold):
TGS Secured Credit Facility--(Issue raised  by Don Black regarding the
feasibility of pledging linepack gas.  We need to check with Robert George on
this issue.)

Imbedded Capital Contracts--(Scott Porter raised the issue of developing a
new form of template with Andrea and asked that we discuss the issue with
Robert George.)

Distribution Contracts--The commercial group would like to have preapproved
distribution contract forms available to give to customers so that the
customer can submit them to the distribution company when electing a
commercial bypass.  Only two distributors have had their form approved by the
ENARGAS.  We are looking into what we can offer to our customers in the other
distribution territories to speed the process of finalising distribution
contracts with the LDCs to avoid long delays.

ENARGAS Expedientes--ENARGAS has issued an order to Enron to amend three of
its gas contracts to modify references to firm transportation and to unbundle
the pricing.  The ENARGAS also sent a letter to our customers which we feel
overstepped their regulatory role.  The meeting between Roberto Pensoti and
Hector Formica was held last Thursday.  Roberto had a follow up phone
conversation with Hector on Friday and had a meeting Monday morning with
Alicia Federico to get a feel for the amount of resistance we will get. We
have been given a 30 day extension to respond to the order in order to have
meetings with the ENARGAS and try to come to some resolution on this issue.
The first meeting will be scheduled early next week.

Neuquen Tax Assessment--Andrea has faxed or emailed the pertinent information
regarding the stamp tax assessment on the Technical Assistance Agreement
between TGS and EPCA to George Frumkin, Anna Sepulveda and Michelle Blaine
who will co-ordinate with TGS and Perez Companc on the strategy for
responding to the assessment.  Michelle will call TGS outside counsel today
in order to hire him to also represent EPCA.  EPCA has filed its response to
Neuquen using the arguments prepared by TGS on January 27.  Michelle Blaine
has requested information regarding what the next step by Neuquen might
possibly be.  We will look into the issue.

Tax Lobbying--Jordan Mintz and Terry Thorn are proposing a series of meetings
with government officials in late February and have asked Carlos Bastos to
see if he can also arrange a meeting with Mr. Lenicov at that time.  Issues
include determining whether the stamp tax and turnover tax issues can be
lobbied at the national level or only at the provincial level.  There is a
proposal that was floated that the turnover tax could be included in the VAT
tax scheme which might solve the problem with the turnover tax.  The focus of
the meetings is to determine how a lobbying strategy can be developed and who
should be involved in the actual lobbying process.  Jordan Mintz is handing
off the responsibility he had assumed on this issue to Jim Ginty.  Jordan has
asked Carlos Bastos to see if he can set up a meeting with Mr. Lenicov on
March 11th or 12th since Terry Thorn can be in Buenos Aires on those days.

Transportation Capacity Release Guidelines--Must review and comment on new
ENARGAS proposed guidelines by February 5.  Comments were made on February 5.

Vandenfil--Vandenfil has filed for a pre-bankruptcy proceeding which has not
yet been "opened" by the court due to the January recess.  For the last three
months Vandenfil has made their payments only after our sending them
termination notices with a two business day cure period.    The most likely
scenario during the preliminary bankruptcy period is that our contract will
be "continued" by the trustee giving us a priority in payment for ongoing
deliveries of gas.  After the preliminary bankruptcy is opened if we have not
been served notice that our contract is "continued" within 30 days we would
be allowed to terminate the contract.  One of the risks that we face with
this customer is that they may argue to the trustee that we cannot terminate
the contract claiming we are providing a public service.

Imasa Bid--Format of Enron's original proposal structure changed.  Enron and
Albanesi submitted joint termsheet to Central Puerto in November  where Enron
proposed signing two contracts with Central Puerto, one for the supply of all
the gas transportation and another for the supply for 60 percent of the gas
requirements and Albanesi proposed two contracts, one for supplying 40
percent of the supply of the gas and another for the building of the pipeline
spur.  Central Puerto is studying the proposals and has not responded as of
January 25, 1999.

Dow Pipeline Spur Feasibility Study--Enron and Dow are studying the
feasibility of building a pipeline between TGS and two affiliates of Dow.
Issues include determining whether our CEIASA shareholder and owners
agreements preclude Enron from building spurs for end users and whether spurs
that serve more than one customer can be built under current regulatory
guidelines.  Andrea will be putting together a short report based on her
meeting with Nestor Martinez.   A team meeting consisting of legal,
regulatory, commercial, credit and structuring met yesterday to discuss the
broad parameters of the Dow spur proposal.  The commercial group is preparing
a first draft of a build, operate and finance termsheet that they would like
to present to the customer on Thursday to be reviewed by Robert George.
Credit is still doing its analysis of the two proposed counterparties.

Contract Review--Preliminary gas contract reviews for Central Puerto and Ave
Fenix for Rob Rice and Federico Cerisoli.

Gas Deals:
Chauvco--20 day gas supply contract being drafted
Cerro VanGuardia--Amendment to the gas sale agreement being drafted to cover
negotiated changes to the take or pay provisions.
Bagley--Two Offer letters sent to two Bagley entities for review, Enron was
not the low bidder.  I have been asked by to look into how other "marketers"
are avoiding the turnover tax and thus be more competitive than we are.  The
customer is looking at the relative risks between firm distribution and
interruptable distribution but is running up against a deadline for actually
requesting a contract template for distribution services.  The contract is
slated to begin March 23, however, the distributor has 30 days to respond for
requests for distribution services.
Total--Spot master agreement proposed for transactions out of Neuquen.  Short
term draft offer for gas out of Chubut being reviewed by Total.  A separate
one year supply contract template supplied by Total is being reviewed.  The
customers template contains the same type of language that gave us Antitrust
trouble in the PCR contract.  Peidra Buena--Gas sale agreement for peaking
gas.    Final offer sent and Gas has started flowing.  We are now working on
a one year contract.  A termsheet has been sent to the customer.
Dow--Negotiating offer letter format for sale of gas to two Dow affiliates.
Gas deal is related to but independent of the spur issue.  A mark up of draft
has been received the end of last week, Dow indicates that further comments
are to be sent soon.

Power Deals:
We need to draft an output marketing form of contract for the purchase of
electricity.

Argentine Signatories:
Scott Neal has approved a new structure for signatories in Argentina.  I will
work with Hope Duggan firm on the new POA's.


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 09/01/2000 12:05
PM ---------------------------

John G Rigby
07/21/1999 06:28 PM
To: Kay Mann/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Nigeria Tax Issues

---------------------- Forwarded by John G Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
07/21/99 06:30 PM ---------------------------

seyi.bickersteth@ng.arthurandersen.com on 07/20/99 11:10:01 AM
To: Michael Norris/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: John G Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, James
MacCallon/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Nigeria Tax Issues

We will send our opinion by E-mail today 20/7/99.  I suggest you get the
opinion
first and let us discuss on Wednesday.  I think the process will be easier if
you review our opinion first.

Regards.

Seyi

______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________

To:     Seyi Bickersteth
cc:     jrigby@ei.enron.com, jmaccal@ei.enron.com
From:   Michael_Norris@ei.enron.com
Date:   07/20/99 02:53 AM
Subject:  Nigeria Tax Issues
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________

Seyi,

James MacCallon has now left for Mexico.  I am just returning from India and
must step in where he left off.  I see James has sent a few emails and faxes
to
you but I can find no reply from AA although there is a 14-July email from you
indicating a reply would be sent by 16-July.   Have you sent a reply and I
have
missed it?

Given that the commercial team is now at a critical point and needs to
understand the Nigeria tax implications for the venture and bid, perhaps we
should short-cut this Q&A process and have a conference call.  I would suggest
early AM Tuesday 20th, what works for you?

During the call, John Rigby can provide background on the project then we can
discuss the questions James sent you earlier (12th, 16th-AM, 16th-PM).
Additionally, I would like to confirm whether the attached Nigeria Tax Chart
(TC-NIGE-Elf...) is still valid and touch on the below topics:

   Are construction activities conducted approx. 30-35 miles offshore Nigeria
   subject to Nigeria income tax if paid by a Nigerian client (i.e., Elf
   Petroleum Nigeria, Ltd.)?  I recall from advice AA provided 2nd
quarter-1998
   there is an issue as to whether offshore construction services are
"consumed"
   in Nigeria.
   The bid package suggest Elf will withhold taxes unless Contractor provides
   "official documents unquestionably enacting an exemption from any
withholdng
   in connection with the Contract."  If the offshore Nigeria activities were
   outside Nigeria territorial waters, would it be possible to obtain such an
   exemption certification?
   Is it still necessary for a foreign company to form a Nigerian subsidiary
to
   conduct business in Nigeria?  I recall that at one point Branches need
   special approval which was difficult to obtain but James informed me this
has
   changed.
   Have you commonly seen Nigerian and non-Nigerian companies enter into
   consortiums or contractual joint ventures to execute a construction project
   in Nigeria?  Are there any special issues Enron should be aware of?
   In the past, a company subject to Nigeria net income tax may have fully
   satisfied its tax liability with advance taxes retained by its client.
   However, due to the lack of physical receipts,  there was no allowed credit
   for these advance taxes.  Is this still the case?  Are you familiar with
   contractual language used by the Contractor to protect his tax position and
   ensure receipts are provided in a timely manner?  Elf has suggested it
would
   provide receipts "when they are received from the relevant Tax Authority"
but
   this provides little (or no) comfort based on my prior dealings with
Nigeria.
   The bid package language on VAT is somewhat troubling.  It suggests
   Contractor must furnish a copy of its VAT registration before issuing its
   first invoice.  It goes on to add that VAT which may be legally payable by
   Elf in respect of non-resident Contractor invoices "shall be paid and
   collected in accordance with the applicable Nigerian Tax laws and
   Regulations."  Can you confirm this would not allow Elf to withhold VAT
from
   Contractor under a so called "reverse charge VAT" mechanism?

I look forward to hearing from you.  If wish to call me, my direct line is
713-345-6420.  My fax line is 713-646-7151.

Regards.

(See attached file: TC-NIGE-Elf Amenam-Kpono Project.xls)
---------------------- Forwarded by Michael Norris/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
07/19/99
02:12 PM ---------------------------

James MacCallon
07/19/99 01:54 PM

To:   Michael Norris/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject:  Fax sent 12 July 1999

---------------------- Forwarded by James MacCallon/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
07/19/99 01:49 PM ---------------------------

James MacCallon
07/12/99 10:37 AM

To:   Seyi.bickersteth@ng.arthurandersen.com
cc:

Subject:  Fax sent 12 July 1999

Dear Seyi:

I am sending a copy of the fax sent to you earlier this day.  The attachment
is
a Word 97 document.  Please let me know if you have trouble opening it.

Incidentally, I have had the pleasure of working with you in the past.  Tim
Archer and I met with you a number of years ago regarding the establishment of
an indigenous company which was to provide assistance to M-I Nigeria on
various
levels.  I look forward to working with you again.

James MacCallon

(See attached file: AA&Co_1.doc)

 - TC-NIGE-Elf Amenam-Kpono Project.xls
 - AA&Co_1.doc

*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.  If you
are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery
of
the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to
anyone.
In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by
reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer does not
consent
to Internet email for messages of this kind.  Opinions, conclusions and other
information in this message that do not relate to the official business of my
firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.


I don't know about meter 4486, but the other three are good.  In addition,
meter 5792 is another meter that is serviced in the Lufkin-Diboll area.

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Heidi Withers                           03/14/2000 10:14 AM

To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Walters/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Additional Transport Expense on Entex meters

Eric, I am checking the process now for incorporating all transport revenue
due Ed for delivery meters in the Texas region.  The following meters have
transport rates attached to them which are above and beyond the matrix rates
Ed quotes to Tom.  I believe that we are already capturing all Ed's
revenue/Tom's expense for this gas at these meters, but want to be sure of
that.   Would you let me know if these are the meters for which we are
manually moving around money from Tom to Ed for the residential portion of
the Lufkin-Diboll volume?

I believe that the industrial portion of this volume is included already as
part of Ducote's deal, and I believe that the residential portion is volume
which you determine and then move from Tom to Ed every month.

Is this right?

Heidi


Media Inquiries: Chris Stockton
                 (713) 215-2010
Other Inquiries: Rate Department 1-800-248-0404  Option #7
August 29,2000

To:  Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation Customers
     and Shippers

Re:  Cash Out Indices - August 2000

    FT                   AVG.          BUY        SELL
  ------                ------        ------     ------
  Zone 1                4.1950        3.8250     4.4600
  Zone 2                4.2475        3.8725     4.5075
  Zone 3                4.3000        3.9200     4.5550
  Zone 4                4.3219        3.9402     4.5781
  Zone 5                4.4171        4.0279     4.6782
  Zone 6                4.4960        4.1006     4.7613

    IT                   AVG.          BUY        SELL
  ------                ------        ------     ------
  Zone 1                4.1950        3.8250     4.4600
  Zone 2                4.2475        3.8725     4.5075
  Zone 3                4.3000        3.9200     4.5550
  Zone 4                4.3538        3.9721     4.6100
  Zone 5                4.5647        4.1755     4.8258
  Zone 6                4.7292        4.3338     4.9945

   FTG                   AVG.          BUY        SELL
  ------                ------        ------     ------
  Zone 1                4.1950        3.8250     4.4600
  Zone 2                4.2475        3.8725     4.5075
  Zone 3                4.3000        3.9200     4.5550
  Zone 4                4.3749        3.9932     4.6311
  Zone 5                4.6629        4.2737     4.9240

                         AVG.          BUY        SELL
                        ------        ------     ------
  FTNT                  4.3000        3.9300     4.5500

For information concerning cash out transactions, please contact
Orie Harris at (713)215-4390.

Stella Yu
Manager - Rate Systems
(713)215-3381

--------------------------ADDITIONAL X12 INFORMATION------------------------
Trans. Svc. Provider: 007933021 - TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE CORPORATION
   Notice Identifier: L0008291
     Critical Notice: No
      Type of Notice: 6-Other
   Required Response: 5-No Response Required
   Resp By Date/Time: N/A
Notice Eff Date/Time: 08/29/00 07:47:16
Notice End Date/Time: N/A
              Status: 1-Initiate
 Prior Notice Ident.: N/A
____________________________________________________________________________

 - C.DTF