Per Nancy Hetrick's request, attached is a spreadsheet that details Flight
1001, Frame 6 Functionality.

Regards,
________________________________
Shirley Whyte
713.906.5224

Testing Website: http://65.67.37.96
----- Original Message -----
From: "Hetrick, Nancy" <Nancy.Hetrick@ENRON.com>
To: <rms@ercot.com>; <set@ercot.com>; <testplan@ercot.com>
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 12:18 AM
Subject: FW: PUC Concerns with V. 1.4 Cutover

These are the questions and concerns provided by Connie and Trish.
To Dos:
* For consistency, Dave Odle will you please address the first
four items and provide the functionality difference for Version 1.3 and
1.4 as requested.  Please send this information ASAP to all three
listserves.
* Upon receipt of the above information, each company should
address from their perspective, the questions posed in the second
paragraph.
* Each company (TDSP, CR, ERCOT) should then address from your
companies' perspective each of the questions regarding the various
Options.
* Shirley Whyte - as ITPTA would you please provide to all three
listserves ASAP an explanation of what funcitonality is tested in Frame
6, so that companies may specially answer question #7.
* Please evaluate the various options provided in the previous
email and document from your companies perspective:  known or peceived
risks, any ideas on how to mitigate these risks, what contingency plans
do we need in place, etc.

I wanted to get these items to you as soon as possible so you may begin
to evaluate,etc.  Since we have extremely tight timeframe for companies
to gather this information and rather than forward all of this
information to me to somehow combine.  By noon, Tuesday, October 30th,
please provide from your companies perspective (TDSP, CR, and ERCOT) for
each option:  pros, risks associated with each option, any ways to
mitigate these risks, impacts to the market/customers, and what would be
the contingency plan.  Discussion around these items will also help us
to answer the other questions posed, but please come to the meeting
prepared with your companies response to all of the questions.

I realize that this may not make sense on Monday morning (since it is
1:15 Saturday morning), so please feel free to let me know if you have
any questions, etc.  Thanks.

Nancy A. Hetrick
Enron Corp.
Director, Government Affairs
Phone:  712-366-3399
Pager:   888-912-1426

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: "Corona, Connie" <Connie.Corona@puc.state.tx.us>@ENRON
> Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:19 AM
> To: Hetrick, Nancy
> Subject: PUC Concerns with V. 1.4 Cutover
>
> Nancy,
>
> We believe a good starting point for next week's workshops, as well as
> Staff's discussions with the Commissioners, would be a chart that
> breaks out
> the following:
>
> 1--Functions that will not change from Texas SET v. 1.3 to v. 1.4
> 2--Functions that will experience minor changes from v. 1.3 to v. 1.4
> 3--Functions that will experience significant changes from v. 1.3 to
> v. 1.4
> 4--Functions that new to v. 1.4
>
> We'd like to answer the following questions with respect to such a
> breakout:
> Can we reasonably expect that functions in Categories 1 and 2 will
> function
> with the same degree of reliability in v. 1.4 as they currently do in
> v.
> 1.3?  What are the risks associated with the failure of functions in
> Categories 3 and 4?  What are the ramifications of those failures?
> What
> workarounds are conceivable?  What workarounds are practical?
>
> Additionally, Staff has the following concerns and questions with the
> options presented thus far for cutting over to Texas SET Version 1.4.
>
> 1.  None of the schedules thus far have allowed sufficient time for
> production testing.  Market participants have suggested that 4-6 weeks
> is
> appropriate.
>
> 2.  There is high probability based on problems encountered with v.
> 1.3
> during the pilot of major problems with transactions.  Since
> non-choosing
> customers will be migrated to the affiliate REP in January, this
> coupled
> with the first concern, above, poses a significant risk.  This risk is
> most
> significant since the largest percentage of transferred customers is
> in the
> residential class.
>
> 3.  There is no plan that clearly lays out risks/trade-offs if the
> migration
> doesn't work.  For example, if the cutover fails, would parties
> continue
> with 1.3?  If so, what are the ramifications for full market open on
> 1/1/02,
> and on market participants who have not tested on v. 1.3?
>
> 4.  Is market open (as defined by participants) tied absolutely to
> cutting
> over to v. 1.4?
>
> 5.  What happens if the market opens under v. 1.3?  What functionality
> would
> be missing?  Are there easy workarounds for this missing
> functionality?
>
> 6.  Is it a possibility that everyone cuts over to v. 1.4 on Dec.
> 29/30, the
> pilot caps are lifted for all customer classes, but residential
> customers
> are still left with bundled rates (non-PTB) but not transferred until
> February?
>
> 7.  What are the risks and ramifications for each market participant
> and
> each customer class if frame 6 of testing has major problems that
> cannot be
> corrected for release in v.  1.4 by the timelines proposed?
>
> Please contact us if you need any clarification.  Thanks.
>
> Connie & Trish
>
> connie.corona@puc.state.tx.us <mailto:connie.corona@puc.state.tx.us>
> patricia.dolese@puc.state.tx.us
> <mailto:patricia.dolese@puc.state.tx.us>
>
>

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************

 - Frame6Functionality.xls


Ken, FYI....I have asked Kathy to send you the plan so you can see next steps......

-----Original Message-----
From: Anne Neeson [mailto:ANEESON@uwtgc.org]
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 12:07 PM
To: Olson, Cindy; 'Kathy Mayfield@Enron'
Cc: Jackie Martin; Susy Smith
Subject: UW Board Meeting

Cindy and Kathy --

The United Way Board meeting went great this morning.  The Board was
enthusiastic about the One Houston United Campaign! I think they felt the
plan was well thought out and could generate excitement as well as
contributions within the community!  They liked the idea of any funds over
$4 million going to a United Way One Houston United Restricted Fund for
future emergencies like Allison.  They voted to have the entire United Way
Board as the volunteer committee too.

Thanks so much for all you are doing on this -- your leadership is making
things happen in a BIG way!

More later!
Anne


Dear Mr. LARRY CAMPBELL:

Thank you for your order.

You bought 200 shares of PMCS (Pmc-sierra Inc Com) at 114 15/64.

ORDER DETAILS:
The tracking number for this order is: B-170-AAWJ-6459
Order entered at:                      09:51:35 on 11/09/00
Order processing began at:             09:51:36
Order executed at:                     09:51:36 on 11/09/00

ACCOUNT DETAILS:
Time and Date: 09:51:36 on 11/09/00
Your position in PMCS is 0 shares
Your real cash total is $13,189.60

You will receive a printed Datek Online confirmation by postal mail, or by
electronic delivery if you are subscribed to that service.

Questions regarding this transaction? Contact our Customer Support department
by e-mailing support@datek.com. Please reference the order tracking number.


Here is the spreadsheet we discussed in today's meeting.  It should be pretty
straightforward.  If you have any questions, please ask.  I'll be happy to
help you out.

I will look at a way to "tie-in" Winzip with this spreadsheet.  I don't know
if it is possible, but if I can accomplish it, I'll let you know.

Greg

---------------------- Forwarded by Greg Couch/HOU/ECT on 11/14/2000 10:59 AM
---------------------------

Greg Couch
09/27/2000 02:17 PM
To: Steve Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C
Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dutch Quigley/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Excel file to help you out

Here is a spreadsheet I worked up to help you determine what files need to be
cleaned up.  It is pretty simple and straightforward.  You can enter a
directory, file extention (if you want all file types, just enter a "*"), a
minimum file size, and a modified before date.  The spreadsheet will perform
a search of the directory and all subdirectories and return the files
matching the criteria you specified.

The information is returned sorted by directory, but you can then sort by
size, date, or whatever.

This should help you make a quick pass through your files on the "O" drive to
determine some of the older/bigger ones you can clean up.

I would encourage you not to just enter "O:\" in the directory because the
program will take forever, and you will run out of rows in excel to store the
data.  Since it is in Excel, it will take just a while if you run it on a
directory with a lot of files, so be a little patient.

I don't want to spend a lot of time supporting this thing, so if you
distribute further, just don't tell them where you got it from (unless you
want to designate a given person on your desk to perform the work).

Let me know if you have questions or problems.

Greg


Per Bass-
like last year we get 13 guys, one must remain on IR for the entire week.
Note - the person does not have to be injured.

Pickups and drops are every monday.

If you do not know how to add/drop, ask any of us from last year.
PL


Given the current tremendous energy market volatility and as we stretch
resources to make our commercial goals for 2000, we think it would be
appropriate to postpone the ENA 2000 Offsite to early next year.  I trust
this meets with your approval and thanks for all the hard work.

Regards
Dave and John


MWilczek@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:

The NYISO is reserving the following hours per ECA 20001006B in the
September 25, 2001 Real-Time Market to verify prices:

HQ:  none
NE:  none
OH:  none
PJM: 00:00 - 05:00

Prices in the September 26, 2001 Day-Ahead Market are correct.

This e-mail information is a copy of the official posting which can be
found at the following address of our website:
http://mis.nyiso.com/public/htm/OperMessages/CurrentOperMessages.htm#mm


Mr. Lay has reqested that your names be added to his executive list for
certain mailings, i.e., Christmas cards, etc.  In order to achieve this,
please complete the following information and return to me ASAP:

Spouse Name (if applicable):
Residence Address:
City, State, Zip

Thanks so much.


Attached are the significant events for Government and Regualtory Affairs for
the first three weeks of February:


What do you mean "Happy Hour"?!  How can we be happy when we're losing our
Erica!!
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 08/08/2000 10:36 AM -----

	Pat Radford
	08/08/2000 10:32 AM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roger Balog/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy
Banczak/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandi M Braband/HOU/ECT@ECT, Teresa G
Bushman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Carter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Barton Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Shonnie Daniel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter del Vecchio/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy E
Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shawna Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Gaffney/TOR/ECT@ECT,
Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wayne Gresham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark E
Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anne C Koehler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Travis McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet H
Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janice R Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julia Murray/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Portz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael A
Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B
Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lance Schuler-Legal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lou Stoler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ann Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stuart
Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberlee A
Bennick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Genia FitzGerald/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nony Flores/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda R Guinn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ed B Hearn
III/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary J Heinitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Deb
Korkmas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laurie Mayer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Ogden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debra
Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Young/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Merrill W Haas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Gillaspie/HOU/ECT@ECT, Suzanne
Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Erica Braden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri L Cromwell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Joya Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janette Elbertson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kaye
Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jenny Helton/HOU/ECT@ect, Taffy Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Linda J Noske/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda J Simmons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Twanda
Sweet/HOU/ECT@ECT, Becky Tlucek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda Whitehead/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Chaundra Woods/HOU/ECT@ECT, James Grace/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Brent
Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Martin W
Penkwitz/NA/Enron@Enron, Jason Peters/Corp/Enron@Enron, John
Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Matt
Maxwell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Samantha Ferguson/NA/Enron@Enron, Elizabeth
Lauterbach/NA/Enron@Enron, Gloria Cruz/Corp/Enron@Enron, Carolyn
George/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dina Snow/Corp/Enron@Enron, Paula Craft/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Reginald Shanks/HOU/ECT@ECT, Claudia Meraz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Claudia
Perez/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Happy Hour at Ninfa's

FROM BARBARA GRAY AND SHEILA TWEED

The ENA Legal Department will hold its Summer Happy Hour at Ninfa's on
Tuesday, August 15, 2000 from 5:30 pm to 7:00 pm.  Everyone in the Department
is invited.  Please come and welcome our new staff members and to thank Erica
Braden for all of her hard work and wish her well in her new position with
EBS Legal.  Please let Pat Radford  (ext. 39282) know if you will not be
attending no later than Monday, August 14th.  We look forward to seeing
everyone at Ninfa's.


Attached is a revised Credit Watch listing as of 3/26/01.
If there are any personnel in your group that were not included in this
distribution, please insure that they receive a copy of this report.
To add additional people to this distribution, or if this report has been
sent to you in error, please contact Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002.
For other questions, please contact Bill Bradford at x3-3831, Russell Diamond
at x5-7095, or Brant Reves at x3-9897.


At the request of John Allario, I am attaching our proposed form of
Non-Disclosure Agreement.   If the enclosed meets with your approval, please
execute the agreement and return it to me via fax no. (713) 646-3490.  I will
then have it executed by Enron.  If you have any comments or questions please
call Mark Greenberg, Senior Counsel, at (713) 345-8897 or me at (713)
853-3399.  We look forward to hearing from you.


Rebecca, if you wouldn't mind I would like to sit in on the Monday meeting.
I think that Mariella from what I have seen and heard is very capable.  I
strongly believe that we need to put a dedicated (with fresh eyes) SWAT team
on this one that has control of the complete commercial, technical and
financial aspects of this project.  This is the only way to be effective.
Whether it is with you or me or both, I am indifferent

I would like to ensure that Kishkill, Wiggs, Gonzales and Alberquerque are
not buried in this project given other goals and objectives.

Thanks

Regards
Delainey

---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 11/30/2000
03:03 PM ---------------------------

Rebecca McDonald@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
11/29/2000 07:52 AM
To: David W Delainey@ECT
cc:
Subject: Cuiaba I Team

Dave,

I am sorry that I was unable to meet with you yesterday on Cuiba.  Jim has
told me what the two of you decided and it is fine with me.  Below is a note
that I received this morning from Pete.  The meeting he is referencing is an
indepth update on the project that I requested a week ago.  You are more than
welcome to attend if you would like to - just let me know.

I am not sure that Pete is the right guy to work this or not, but I do agree
that we need to introduce someone else into the process - I am thinking
either Chris Hunt or Mariella Mahan.  I would be happy to discuss with you
why I recommend one of those two individuals.

Rebecca
---------------------- Forwarded by Rebecca McDonald/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
11/29/2000 07:57 AM ---------------------------

Peter E Weidler@ENRON
11/29/2000 06:56 AM
To: Rebecca McDonald/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Cuiaba I Team

the list below is going to Delainey - it is accurate from my perspective - if
the project ends up in your shop for completion and fixing up - and if it
ends up under me - some of these part time guys should become full time and
some of the full time guys should take a back seat.

I would have the full time dedicated team be -

Jose Bestard (he currently is chief of regulatory for South America) - he
negotiated the original PPA and has indepth knowledge of how the regulatory
system does and does not work.

Joao Carlos Alberquerque - top notch Brazilian power expert - has the right
contacts and relationships and can get us through the maze of Brazilian
resistance.  Currently he is headed for wholesale merchant.

John Novak - best legal mind - needs to curb the use of outside lawyers a bit
- has been on the project continuous from day one - and needs to be
rejuvenated a bit - but has thourough understanding of how bthe entire
project is wired together.

Rob Gay - Finance

Laine Powell - is currently President of the oeprating companies - Cuiaba is
producing 300 mw of power which is being sold and paid for.

Felipe Ospina - modeler - I don't know this guy -  he is relatively new to
the project and seems satisfactory

Would recommend also a fresh set of eyes on the project - not front line
negotiator - but someone good at structuring - or work outs - to review
overall project structure objectively and challange conventional wisdom.

Other folks on the list below can support the dedicated team - part time.

Would tell these guys - this is your only job - and here is your starting
point - new deal.  Your job is not just to close financing - it is to get
Enron's money out or otherwise improve the returns of the project.    You
will get paid based on this point forward.   It will take at least 9 months
to implement a solution that improves our returns or gest more than just
financial close achieved.

This leaves some sticky situations - Rick Lammers has absolutely busted his
ass getting things done and moving the project forward - he has been lead
developer - but has had lots of "help" from Bannantine and the entire team.
Help tended to obscure responsibility and accountability.  I am not sure
anyone could have gotten this thing done by now - but certainly there were
some things that could have been done better - in 20/20 hindsight  - and some
things that can be done better now.  The things that come be done better now
- I am pushing into Laines's area of responsibility this week.  People need
to get rededicated and fired back up - I also think it is kind of difficult
to "take over" the project without making some changes in the way it is being
run.

For the review on Monday - I have asked the following people to present -

Rick Lammers
Laine Powell
Jose Bestard

Also in attendance will be John Novak, Joe Kishkill, Brett Wiggs, Rob Gay and
myself.

The guys asked if Jim Bannantine should be present - I said no - let me know
if you would like him there.

You should see - a brief description of the overall project (not the strategy
- just how it is wired together- where the money is intended to be be) and
then straight to a listing of all things that need to get done to "finish"
the project to the point where we have financial close and a functioning
supply and PPA.

Joe and I and Rob will be in Houston and the rest of the team will dial in a
conference call.

Let me know if the above format is ok.

Pete

---------------------- Forwarded by Peter E Weidler/NA/Enron on 11/29/2000
06:29 AM ---------------------------

Miguel Padron
11/29/2000 04:17 AM
To: James M Bannantine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joe
Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron, Peter E Weidler/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: Cuiaba I Team

To all, Here is the Cuiaba I Team....Miguel

---------------------- Forwarded by Brett R Wiggs/SA/Enron on 11/28/2000
10:40 AM ---------------------------

Richard A Lammers
11/27/2000 04:35 PM
Sent by: Richard A Lammers
To: Miguel Padron/SA/Enron@Enron, Brett R Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: Cuiaba I Team

Cuiaba 1 team currently consists of:

Rick Lammers -lead developer
john novak- legal
Rob G Gay- Finance part time
Traci Bersoni- support Finance part time
Stephen Gray- support Finance part time
Felipe Ospina- project analyst
Gabriela Aguilar  -support -gas part time
Emmanuel Rengade- Sudam financing and Equity Sale
Marcus Stephen-Sudam financing and Equity Sale

Joao Carlos Alberquerque- support PPA
Jose Bestard- support PPA and regulatory

Asset management

Laine A Powell-construction management and operations
Christiaan Huizer-Project analyst

Let me know if I can help furtherh


Margo Reyna
Regulatory Analyst
Enron Corp., Government Affairs
Phone:  713-853-9191

----- Forwarded by Margo Reyna/NA/Enron on 12/04/2000 08:47 AM -----

	djcustomclips@djinteractive.com
	12/04/2000 08:34 AM
	Please respond to nobody

		 To: 243648@WCTOPICS.djnr.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Telecommunications Regulations: U.S.: FCC May Phase Out Phone Fees
Paid by Local Telephone ...

FCC May Phase Out Phone Fees Paid by Local Telephone Companies

12/04/2000
Dow Jones Business News
(Copyright (c) 2000, Dow Jones&Company, Inc.)
WASHINGTON -- In a boost for the Baby Bells, the head of the Federal
Communications Commission said he hopes his agency soon will approve a plan
to gradually eliminate the billions of dollars of fees local telephone
companies pay each other to complete calls, The Wall Street Journal reported
on Monday.
FCC Chairman William Kennard is circulating among the other four
commissioners a plan to phase out the fees over three years. He said details
are being negotiated, but the plan would set a formula to determine if call
traffic -- and therefore the fees -- is going disproportionately from some
local phone companies to others, in particular those carrying many calls to
an Internet services provider.
The phaseout plan would cap temporarily the number of calls one phone company
must pay when another completes calls from the first company's customers, the
Journal reported. After the phaseout period, the fees would be eliminated.
Companies competing with the Bells that carry a lot of traffic to Internet
services providers include Pac-West Telecomm Inc., Stockton, Calif., and
Focal Communications Corp., of Chicago.
Baby Bells would prefer an immediate elimination of the fees, since the Bells
pay a disproportionate amount of them, but officials say they could live with
the fees being phased out.
Mr. Kennard told the Journal that the plan to eliminate the fees was prompted
by the explosion of competitive local phone companies living off the fees by
carrying calls to Internet services providers. States would be given
flexibility in adopting the fee elimination, if the FCC approves it, he said.
They wouldn't be obligated to accept it if they already had a fee system that
worked well.
Originally, the fees, known as reciprocal compensation, were adopted at the
behest of the Bells and other incumbents. They were supposed to benefit the
incumbent phone companies, because customers of competing local phone
companies were calling their customers and therefore increasing the traffic
on the incumbent's phone network, the Journal reported.
But then competing phone companies were set up, and their business included
serving Internet services providers, which accept calls but don't make them.
Under the fee system, that one-way traffic tends to work against the Baby
Bells. The competing companies have said that if the fees were cut, it would
cause a hike in Internet access costs, because they would have to charge more
to carry the calls.
Mr. Kennard said he hopes for a decision on the plan before year end.
Copyright (c) 2000 Dow Jones&Company, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.

Folder Name: Telecommunications Regulations: U.S.
Relevance Score on Scale of 100: 68

______________________________________________________________________
To review or revise your folder, visit Dow Jones CustomClips or contact Dow
Jones Customer Service by e-mail at custom.news@bis.dowjones.com or by phone
at 800-369-7466. (Outside the U.S. and Canada, call 609-452-1511 or contact
your local sales representative.)
______________________________________________________________________
Copyright (c) 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved


After you read this, copy entire mail and paste it
into a new e-mail that you will send. Change all the
answers so that they apply to you. Then send this to a

whole bunch of people you know INCLUDING the person
who sent it to you.

The theory is that you will learn a lot of little
known facts about your friends. Remember to send yours

back to the person who sent it to you. You never know
what you'll learn! This is kinda fun.

Tell me about yourself:

1. What time is it:? 9:30pm
2. Name as it appears on your birth certificate:
Kimberly Jean Kirkwood
3. Nicknames: kimmy, kirky,little woody, kimber
4. Parent's names: Tom and Barbara
5. Number of candles that appeared on your last
birthday cake? 23
6. Date that you regularly blow them out: June 1
7. Pets: Maverick and Murphy
8. Height: 5' 5"
9. Eye color: blue/green
10. Hair Color :sandy brown/blonde with highlights
11. Piercing: ears, bellybutton
12. Tattoos:  none
13. How much do you love your job (scale 1 to 100) : 60 new job still
learning the ropes! and the market sucks right now so internet adveritising
sales is extremely hard, no sales= no commission!
14. Birthplace: Hayward, California
15. Hometown:  Pleasanton, CA
16. Current Residence: same
17. Been in love before? yep! not enough more
18. how many wicked evil people have you dated?  One, just got rid of him
19. Been toilet-papering (rolling)? Yes
20. Been toilet-papered (rolled)?   yes
21. Loved somebody so much it made you cry? oh yeah!
22. Been in a car crash?  Never, hope it stays that way!
23. 2 doors or 4 (on a car): 4
24. Sprite or 7-Up: Sprite
26. Blanket or Stuffed Animal: Blankie
27. Dumper or Dumpee: Both
28. Color of socks: White
29. Lucky Number: 12
30. Why?: have played sports with it since I was 6 and still playing with it
today!
31. Favorite Movie: Dirty Dancing
32. Favorite Holiday:   Christmas / my birthday
33. Favorite Foods: pizza, beer and mexican food
34. Favorite actor/actress: don't really have one
35. TV Show: All reality shows: Real World/Road rules, Survivor, Temptation
Island
36. Toothpaste: Crest green gel
37. Shampoo: Herbal Essence
38. Perfume/Cologne?: Beautiful
38. Flower: Red roses with daisies
39. Least Favorite Subject In school: history
40. Alcoholic Drink: BEER
41. Sport to Watch:  college basketball(Go Arizona Cats!!  Sweet Sixteen
tomorrow)
42. Zoo Exhibit: dolphins: amazing animals
43. Sesame Street Character: Cookie Monster
44. When was your last hospital visit?  college, drunk ankle injury, ended
up in 4 weeks of physical therapy for it!
45. Broken Bones?: none. lots of stitches and sprains, delocated knee three
from soccer
46. Favorite drink: Diet Coke and beer
47. What color is your bedroom's carpet: Beige
48. How many times did you fail your Permit and/or
Drivers License Test?: never, but barely passed
49. What do you think of Ouija boards? Not for me!
50. Where do you see yourself in 10 yrs? a success women in sales or
marketing, with a great husband and family
51. Who is the last person that you got mail from
before this one? Stephaine Salkow
52. Have you ever been convicted of a crime? Nope, never been caught
53. Which single store would you choose to max your
credit card?: Express/Nordstroms
54. What do you do most often when you are bored?
talk to friends, work out, shop
55. What words or phrases do you overuse?:  Dude, hella
56. Name the person, that you are friends with, that
lives the farthest: Hillary and Eric
57. What is your favorite color? forest green
58. Living situation? at home with mom and dad, free rent!
59. Most annoying thing is: two faced people
60. Who will respond to this fastest? Grover
61. Least likely to respond: I think you will all apply cuz you are such
good friends!
62. What time is it now? 9:44pm
__________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


Did you do the server bounce for me?  If not, it does not have to be done by
11:30.

Faye Ellis
02/17/2000 11:10 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Global Facilites - Maintenace Request - Completed - Request ID: 01003

The following Maintenance Request has been completed:

Click on this link to view document -->


They are great, they actually play every tuesday and thursday at Jimmy
Mak's.  I would love to go and I will try to drum up some support for it
here.  We should probably get there before 9pm to secure good seats even
though they start jamming around 9:30-45.

Paul
---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Choi/SF/ECT on 04/17/2001 02:49 PM
---------------------------

SUZANNE VANN@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
04/17/2001 02:29 PM
To: Paul Choi/SF/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Jimmy Mak's

This Thursday The Mel Brown Sextet is playing at Jimmy Mak's.  I have no idea
if they are any good, but it may be fun.  Want to get a group together and
check it out?
http://portland.citysearch.com/profile/11479609/

-sv


Hello all -

Just a reminder that tomorrow is a training session.

Please let me know if you will not be able to attend.

The location is 32C2 at 4-6 pm.

Thanks -

Adrianne
x57302


---------------------- Forwarded by Claire Broido/HOU/ECT on 02/25/2000 01:10
PM ---------------------------

Stephanie Strong
01/26/2000 02:52 PM
To: Stephanie Strong/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  (bcc: Claire Broido/HOU/ECT)
Subject: MS150 training ride schedule

Attached is the MS150 Training Ride Schedule.  The first ride is this Sunday,
Jan. 30, at 9:00 a.m. (not 8:00) at Memorial Park.  I spoke to the folks at
West U Schwinn and they verified the time change.  The meeting area is at the
large parking lot before you enter the picnic loop.  The picnic loop is
located on the other side of Memorial (across from the running trail).  If
you have any questions, please give me a call.  Thanks!

P.S. This ride is for all levels of riders.

Steph :  )
31653


Oh wait, I can't go to the ball game because I couldn't take a day off from
work to stand in the Enron lobby (or send my secretary to do it for me).

For all of you who have managed to snag tickets for tonight's game
congratulations and you suck.  For the rest of us stuck out in the cold I
suggest the only viable alternative before us is to drown our sorrows in a
cold bottle of beer (or two, or three...).  I realize the mass email has been
MIA the last two weeks.  For some this may have been a welcomed relief.  For
others there may have been some concern that they had been cut-off from the
distribution.  At present no one has been removed from the distribution, but
it is undergoing an audit.  Should it be determined that it is necessary to
remove an individual from the list for any reason that individual will be
notified and given an explanation.  If anyone would like to know the causes
for expulsion you can write to:  I CAN'T BELIEVE ANYONE CARES IF THERE ON
THIS DISTRIBUTION OR NOT BECAUSE THE ONLY PLACE WE SEEM TO GO IS WOODY'S
EVERY THURSDAY BETWEEN 9:30 AND 10:00.

On that note, see you guys at Woody's tonight around 9:30 or 10:00.


Stella,
It is very important  that King Ranch is accurately scheduled in the
system.   Sitara should be updated
with any changes so that Daren can properly manage the Texas Desk position.
Hopefully we have moved
enough off of your desk to allow  you to concentrate on King Ranch.  Too many
discrepancies have been made
and it is very costly to the desk.    Robert can assist if needed.
Thanks,    Pat


Seems very likely that someone else notified DJ of this posting.  Might be
useful for our traders to understand that scrutiny in the short run is going
to be signficant.

Best,
Jeff

	Karen Denne
	06/29/2001 05:03 PM

		 To: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Vance
Meyer/NA/Enron@ENRON, Meredith Philipp/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: FERC proxy price in CA

I got a call from Dow Jones today about a price we had posted on EnronOnline
for day-ahead power at Mead for $105/MWh (the FERC proxy price is $91.87).  I
talked to Tim Belden and just because an offer is posted doesn't mean that
there's been a transaction.  Turns out that under our interpretation of the
FERC order, because Friday for Monday transactions exceed the 24-hour
delivery requirement, we believe they're exempt from the order.  Tim said
that at the end of today, we had done five transactions above the cap, but
they decided to lower the transaction price to the proxy price so we'd reduce
any further exposure and scrutiny.


The word is that we are being purchased from the Enron estate and give Enron 1/3 profits for some term.  The deal goes in front of the bankruptcy judge on Friday.  Supposed to be a good deal.

Do you need tix for the concert?  Do you have to work Friday?  What's the weather like?  Any good fishin hole to wade or drift?

DB
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Joe Ebert <jebert@eadslink.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:39 PM
To:	Baughman Jr., Don
Subject:	RE: My Baby's Page

Noble is gone this weekend if you want to make another trip to Corpus.  It
looks like I will be a good weekend for fishing and nighttime entertainment.
Charlie and Bruce Robison are going to be in town for this Thursday -
hopefully it will be a good show.

Everthing is going great.  I heard that you division got purchased by a
Swiss bank or something to that effect.  Please verify?

Are you doing OK?

-----Original Message-----
From:	Don.Baughman@enron.com [mailto:Don.Baughman@enron.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, January 15, 2002 1:33 PM
To:	jebert@eadslink.com
Subject:	RE: My Baby's Page

Yeah, it rocks, I can tell a HELLUVA difference!  I Can bark those back
tires!  How's life in CC?  Thanks for lettin us stay at your house, hell of
a lot better than a stinky motel.  You coming to Hou. for the rodeo?

Talk to ya soon,

DB
    -----Original Message-----
   From:   Joe Ebert <jebert@eadslink.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Tuesday, January 15, 2002 12:49 PM
   To:     Baughman Jr., Don
   Subject:  RE: My Baby's Page

   Hey,

   I heard that you got a chip for the diesel.  Does it make a big
   difference
   in performance.

   Later,

   Joe

   -----Original Message-----
   From:   Baughman Jr., Don [mailto:Don.Baughman@ENRON.com]
   Sent:   Tuesday, January 15, 2002 11:55 AM
   To:     Brandi Black (E-mail); Clint Wilson (E-mail); David Nobles
   (E-mail);
   Eric Korth (E-mail); Jeff Lenamon (E-mail); Joe Ebert (E-mail); Kari
   Tracey
   (E-mail); Kenneth Schall (E-mail); Lalena Stavinoha (E-mail); Mark
   Doggett
   (E-mail); Matt Doggett (E-mail); Paul  Henry (E-mail); Randy Doggett
   (E-mail); Reid Stavinoha (E-mail); Richard Hrabal (E-mail); Robert
   Pearson
   (E-mail); Sean Patrick Tracey (E-mail); Scott Sims (E-mail); Scott Smith
   (E-mail); Wayne Herndon (E-mail)
   Subject:     FW: My Baby's Page

   Here is my sister Andrea's new baby.  We are proud to present the new
   edition to the Baughman/Williams family, Katheryn Morgan Williams.

   DB
   >  -----Original Message-----
   > From:      "Andrea Williams" <TWILLIAMS@EVI.NET>@ENRON
   > Sent:      Saturday, January 05, 2002 6:53 PM
   > To:   Baughman Jr., Don
   > Subject:   My Baby's Page
   >
   >
   > Just a note to let you know that
   > Baby Katheryn has a web page.
   > Please check it out and leave her
   > a message - we would like to share
   > this wonderful time with her in
   > the years to come.
   > Love, Troy, Andrea, Shelby, and
   > Katheryn
   >
   > http://www.growingfamily.com/webnursery/babypage.asp?URLID=4O1Z1U0D5S
   >
   > Make sure you highlight the entire link, copy it, and paste it in your
   Web
   > browser.
   >

   **********************************************************************
   This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
   and
   may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
   intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
   others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
   authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
   reply
   to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
   all
   copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
   intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence
   a
   binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
   affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
   be
   relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
   Thank you.
   **********************************************************************


CALENDAR ENTRY:	REMINDER

Description:
	Russell in Colorado

Date:		2/26/2001
Time:		8:00 AM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


FYI
If I have left anyone off this distribution list feel free to forward this message.

John Buchanan

-----Original Message-----
From: Fagan, Fran
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 11:17 AM
To: Buchanan, John
Subject: FW: Info. to be mailed to active employees who participate in
Enron Qualified Benefit Plans
Importance: High

John-

You are right, employees have received these notices at home with no explanation.  Below is a memo from Karla Dobbs which explains that this is a notice that the IRS requires.  No action is required by employees.

Thanks,

Fran

-------------------------
Plan amendments require us to submit applications for an advance determination to ensure our plans meet the qualification requirements of section 401 of the Internal Revenue Code.  THESE NOTICES ARE REQUIRED BY THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE.

The following information was/will be sent to active employees participating in the qualified plans as required by the Internal Revenue Service.  These notices use standard language supplied by the Internal Revenue Service.

We have sent these notices via postal mail (mailed 2/5/02 according to IRS requirements) and will send via e:mail to all active plan participants before the end of this week (2/8/02 according to IRS requirements).

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NOTICE:

The attached notices are required communication to plan participants, in accordance with an application for an advance determination filing regarding the qualification of plans described in sections 401, 403(a), 409 and/or 4975(e)(7) of the Code.

1) Interested Parties' rights to Information and Rights to Notice and Comments;
2) Notices to Interested Parties for the Enron Employee Stock Ownership Plan,
3) The Enron Savings Plan, and
4) The Enron Cash Balance Plan


Group,

When doing an import or an export from California there are a few important
guidelines to remember.

IMPORT-This must be FIRM.  A firm import is required so that we provide the
spinning reserves to California (we do this by buying firm energy for the
import).  If the import is non-firm, California will charge us their price
for spinning reserve margins.  This could easily be $400 per mw come this
summer.

EXPORT-This must be NON-FIRM.  A non-firm export allows us to provide
spinning reserves to our bilat trading partners (or to simply sell the energy
without spinning reserves as "non-firm"), and NOT have to pay the California
price for spinning reserve margins.  Conversely if we do a firm export, we
would have to pay for California to supply spinning reserves.  And because
California will sometime use actual purchased energy for spinning reserves,
this could easily be $400 per mw this summer.
California has also proposed cutting firm exports this summer, so a "firm"
export does not imply that the energy would actually be exported anymore than
nonfirm.

IF you have other questions.  Please let me know.

Thanks,
Bill


FYI.

Indexing avoided cost to CDWR purchases sounds like about a 5-yr process to
me.

GAC
---------------------- Forwarded by Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT on 03/14/2001 03:10
PM ---------------------------

"Steven Kelly" <steven@iepa.com> on 03/14/2001 03:05:42 PM
To: "'Alan Comnes'" <alan.comnes@enron.com>, "'Alex Makler (E-mail)'"
<alexm@calpine.com>, "'Alex Sugaoka (E-mail)'" <alex.sugaoka@uaecorp.com>,
"'Allen Jensen (E-mail)'" <al.jensen@nrgenergy.com>, "'Andy Gilford
(E-mail)'" <agilford@wbcounsel.com>, "'Armen Arslanian (E-mail)'"
<Armen.Arslanian@gecapital.com>, "'Bert Hunter'"
<rjhunter@spectrumcapital.com>, "'Bill Adams (E-mail)'" <sangorgon@aol.com>,
"'Bill Barnes (E-mail)'" <bill.barnes@lgeenergy.com>, "'Bill Carlson
(E-mail)'" <william_carlson@wastemanagement.com>, "'Bill Woods (E-mail)'"
<billw@calpine.com>, "'Bo Buchynsky (E-mail)'" <BBuchynsky@aol.com>, "'Bob
Ellery (E-mail)'" <bellery@spi-ind.com>, "'Bob Escalante (E-mail)'"
<rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Bob Gates (E-mail)'" <bob.gates@enron.com>,
"Bob Szymanski (E-mail)" <rjszymanski@powerworksinc.com>, "Bob Tormey
(E-mail)" <rjtormey@duke-energy.com>, "'Carolyn A Baker (E-mail)'"
<cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "'Charles Johnson (E-mail)'" <c.johnson@ejgd.com>,
"'Charles Linthicum (E-mail)'" <charles.linthicum@powersrc.com>, "'Cody
Carter (E-mail)'" <cody.carter@williams.com>, "'Curt Hatton (E-mail)'"
<Curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com>, "'Curtis Kebler (E-mail)'"
<curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "'David Parquet (E-mail)'"
<david.parquet@enron.com>, "'Dean Gosselin (E-mail)'"
<dean_gosselin@fpl.com>, "'Diane Fellman (E-mail)'"
<difellman@energy-law-group.com>, "'Don Scholl (E-mail)'"
<dscholl@purenergyllc.com>, "'Doug Fernley (E-mail)'"
<fernley.doug@epenergy.com>, "Doug Levitt (E-mail)" <SDL@calwind.com>,
"'Duane Nelsen (E-mail)'" <dnelsen@gwfpower.com>, "'Ed Maddox (E-mail)'"
<emaddox@seawestwindpower.com>, "'Ed Tomeo (E-mail)'" <ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>,
"'Edward Lozowicki (E-mail)'" <elozowicki@sjo.coudert.com>, "'Edwin Feo
(E-mail)'" <efeo@milbank.com>, "'Eric Edstrom (E-mail)'"
<edstrome@epenergy.com>, "'Eric Eisenman (E-mail)'"
<eric.eisenman@gen.pge.com>, "'Floyd Gent (E-mail)'"
<fgent@thermoecotek.com>, "Frazier Blaylock (E-mail)"
<frazier_blaylock@ogden-energy.com>, "'Hal Dittmer (E-mail)'"
<hedsf@aol.com>, "'Hap Boyd (E-mail)'" <Hap_Boyd@enron.com>, "'Iliff Steve
(E-mail)'" <siliff@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Jack Pigott (E-mail)'"
<jackp@calpine.com>, "'Janet Heck Doyle (E-mail)'" <jheckdoyle@aol.com>,
"'Joe Greco (E-mail)'" <jgreco@caithnessenergy.com>, "'Joe Ronan (E-mail)'"
<joer@calpine.com>, "'John O'Rourke'" <orourke.john@epenergy.com>, "'Jonathan
Weisgall (E-mail)'" <jweisgall@aol.com>, "'Kawamoto, Wayne'"
<wkawamoto@wm.com>, "'Kelly Lloyd (E-mail)'" <kellyl@enxco.com>, "'Ken
Hoffman (E-mail)'" <khoffman@caithnessenergy.com>, "'Ken Salvagno (E-mail)'"
<kbssac@aol.com>, "'Kent Burton (E-mail)'" <kent_burton@ogden-energy.com>,
"'Larry Kellerman'" <kellerman.larry@epenergy.com>, "'Lucian Fox (E-mail)'"
<lucian_fox@ogden-energy.com>, "'Mark Fillinger'" <mark.fillinger@enron.com>,
"'Mark J. Smith (E-mail)'" <mark_J_smith@fpl.com>, "'Mike Hawkins (E-mail)'"
<hawkins@2000energy.com>, "'Milton Schultz (E-mail)'" <bfpjv@c-zone.net>,
"'Nam Nguyen (E-mail)'" <nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>, "'Paul Wood (E-mail)'"
<paul_wood@ogden-energy.com>, "'Paula Soos (E-mail)'"
<Paula_Soos@ogden-energy.com>, "'Pete Levitt (E-mail)'" <Pete@calwind.com>,
"'Peter H. Weiner'" <peterweiner@paulhastings.com>, "'Phil Reese (E-mail)'"
<rcsc@west.net>, "'Rick S. Koebbe (E-mail)'" <rskoebbe@powerworksinc.com>,
"'Robert Frees (E-mail)'" <freesrj@apci.com>, "'Ross Ain (E-mail)'"
<ain@worldnet.att.net>, "'Scott Harlan (E-mail)'" <harlans@epenergy.com>,
"'Steve Ponder (E-mail)'" <steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "'Tandy McMannes (E-mail)'"
<mcmannes@aol.com>, "'Ted Cortopassi (E-mail)'"
<ted_cortopassi@ogden-energy.com>, "'Thomas Heller (E-mail)'"
<hellertj@apci.com>, "'Thomas Swank'" <swank.thomas@epenergy.com>, "'Tom
Hartman (E-mail)'" <tom_hartman@fpl.com>, "'Tony Wetzel (E-mail)'"
<twetzel@thermoecotek.com>, "'Ward Scobee (E-mail)'"
<wscobee@caithnessenergy.com>, "'Bob Judd (E-mail)'" <caltech@ns.net>,
"'Brian T. Craggq'" <bcragg@gmssr.com>, "'J. Feldman'" <jfeldman@mofo.com>,
"'Kassandra Gough (E-mail)'" <kgough@calpine.com>, "'Kristy Rumbaugh
(E-mail)'" <kristy_rumbaugh@ogden-energy.com>
cc: "Douglas Kerner (E-mail)" <dkk@eslawfirm.com>, "Carol Hudson (E-mail)"
<carol@iepa.com>, "Jan Smutny-Jones (E-mail)" <smutny@iepa.com>, "Katie
Kaplan (E-mail)" <kaplan@iepa.com>, "Steven Kelly (E-mail)" <steven@iepa.com>

Subject: FW: CPUC ALJ Ruling in SRAC Proceeding

FYI.  Attached is a Ruling from CPUC ALJ Cooke in response to the QF/SRAC
issue.  Essentially, the Ruling directs DWR to provide cost data associated
with their contracts by March 19.  Presumedly, the CPUC will review the data
and make a determination as to whether these data in some way represent a
utilities "avoided cost." As noted in the ruling, in order for the CPUC to
utilize these types of data for determination of SRAC, Section 390 of the
Public Utilties Code needs to be amended.

Thus, we're back to the legislature.  In many ways, the CPUC, legislature,
and the Gov are "tossing the ball" which creates more delay.  We can discuss
this on the Friday morning call.

-----Original Message-----
From: Diane Fellman [mailto:difellman@energy-law-group.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 2:57 PM
To: Steven Kelly (E-mail); Jan Smutny-Jones (E-mail)
Subject: CPUC ALJ Ruling in SRAC Proceeding

In case you didn't get this....

 <<03-14-01 ALJ Cooke_Ruling for DWR_information.doc>>

Diane I. Fellman
Energy Law Group LLP
1999 Harrison Street, Suite 2700
Oakland, CA  94612
415.703.6000 (direct dial)
415.703.6001 (direct facsimile)
difellman@energy-law-group.com

 - 03-14-01 ALJ Cooke_Ruling for DWR_information.doc


CBS SportsLine.com  Fantasy Football 2001         Someone will win a millions dollars!  Do you know football?  Would you pay $5 to enter an office pool with a $1 Million grand prize?  There are 3 weeks left in the pro football season and someone is GUARANTEED to win $1 Million in the Office Pool Challenge.  There's still plenty of time left for you to win, so sign up today!   If someone picks every game right in a week, that person is entered into a random drawing with everyone else who made "perfect picks" during the season.  If no one makes "perfect picks" then the 17 weekly high-scorers are entered into a drawing for the $1 Million prize.  With 3 weeks left, you still have 3 chances to make perfect picks or to be one of the weekly high scorers... maybe you'll win all weeks!  Someone is guaranteed to win $1 Million...why can't it be you? SIGN UP TODAY!     	   Fantasy Football only at cbs.sportsline.com  [IMAGE]  ? Grand Prize: $1,000,000   ? First Place: $5,000   ? Second Place: $2,500   ? Third Place: $1,000   ? Fourth - Sixth Place: $500   ? Weekly Prize: $2,500 worth of electronics    Sign Up Today!      [IMAGE]
 		Fantasy Sports for Real  This message has been provided free of charge and free of obligation. If you prefer not to receive emails of this nature please respond to remove@commissioner.com . Do not respond to this email directly.

	[IMAGE]


I was thinking of you on the appropriate day but somehow I never managed to
let you know how much I care about you. I'm thinking of you now too and hope
you are happy and doing well.

Love

Rob

"Sue Vo Herbich, Esq." <sherbich@paclawteam.com> on 07/18/2000 09:53:52 PM
To: <Rob.G.Gay@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Re: Happy Birthday

thank you for your sweet message.  Greg & i went to Las Vegas for 4 days &
all my sisters & their families were there vacationing at the same time.  We
had a great time.  Came back to work in late afternoon today - tired.  Vegas
was actually my gift to Greg for his birthday which was a wk before mine but
we celebrated mine there too.  Got your very nice phone message also -
thanks for cheering up my tired mind & body.  Your voice sounds wonderful &
i breathed in all the telephonic kisses.  Hope all is well on the road to
retirement.  love, sue

-----Original Message-----
From: Rob.G.Gay@enron.com <Rob.G.Gay@enron.com>
To: sherbich@paclawteam.com <sherbich@paclawteam.com>
Date: Monday, July 17, 2000 1:53 PM
Subject: Happy Birthday

>It's a day late and a dollar short, but I wanted you to know I was thinking
>about you. Did you have a good one?
>
>Lots of kisses
>
>Expect my call
>
>Love Rob
>
>


Nav,

Opened my Ivey Alumninet package after about a year in my in box and thought
I would try it out. If this gets to you w/b.

Chris Dorland


Good morning all!

Just a reminder that Dave Steiner will be in the Mt. Hood conference room today at 11am to discuss the position in the IT Infrastructure Group and answer any questions you may have. If you are interested in the position, or would like more information, please stop by!

-----Original Message-----
From: 	Fitzpatrick, Amy
Sent:	Friday, May 11, 2001 3:44 PM
To:	Portland West Desk
Subject:	Available Opening - IT Infrastructure

A position has recently become available in the IT infrastructure group reporting to Dave Steiner.  Dave will be holding an information session on Wednesday, May 16, 2001 at 11:00 am in Mt Hood.

Below are the responsibilities for this position.

?	Available as a point of contact for technology problems no matter where the problem resides.
?	Project oversight for initiatives as assigned by the PDX IT Lead.
?	Project participant for all technology related initiative as directed by PDX IT Lead.
?	Escalation point for technology issues.
?	Support and contact for PDX Servers and Server based applications.
?	Backup support for all other technology issues (Desktop, Voice, LAN/WAN etc..).
?	Primarily Level 2 and 3 support, Level 1 support when needed.
?	Maintaining adherence to Enron standards of operation and compliance.

If you would like additional information about this role, please see Dave Steiner.  If you are interested in being considered for the above position, please let Amy FitzPatrick know no later than Friday, May 18, 2001.


Fraser, what do you think?

You asked me to provide my opinion about the employment agreement provisions relating to target bonus amounts that are based on performance.

The bonus language contained in the majority of the agreements is as follows:

	"Provided that Enron meets its earnings targets and provided that Employee is rated within the top 25% of the performance criteria under Enron's annual performance rating system or its equivalent for the calendar year in question, Employee's annual bonus amounts under the Plan for calendar years 2001, 2002, and 2003 (payable in 2002, 2003, and 2004, respectively), shall be based on an annual bonus target of $_____________."

This language does not address a person's performance as compared to one's peers, but instead looks at the number of performance criteria and requires that a person be in the top 25% of those criteria.  Thus, if there are only 3 rating categories (i.e., 1,2,3, distributed as 10-80-10), the only the people in the top category would be within the top 25/33% of the rating criteria.

This result, however, would limit significantly the number of persons who are eligible to be paid the target bonus.  As a result, I would suggest that the middle category be divided further into either 2 or 3 subcategories (i.e., 2A, 2B, or 2C).  That way, persons who fall out in categories 1 or 2A would be eligible for the target bonus.


yes

	Robert C Williams/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/17/2001 12:06 PM

		 To: Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Marty
Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Riley/WSX/AZURIX@Exchange
		 cc:
		 Subject: Brief on Appeal

Please let me know if you would like a copy of the brief we filed with the
Ninth Circuit.  Thanks.

Bob


It happens to all of us!

I still have a bizillion roses in my yard.  I love them, and I don't baby
them.  I figure if they die, I replace them, since they aren't that expensive.

I would love to include my friend Carlos Sole from EECC for my birthday lunch.

Kay

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 01/03/2001 03:24 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Your Birthday

I only invited Dan and Sheila.  Dan has rsvpd yes, but I don't think Sheila
has even had a chance to look at her emails.  Want to keep it just us?  Where
would you like to go?  I'm going to put it on our calendars.  Would you like
to invite Neil too?

Oh, I decided I'm going to start growing roses since mine have done so well.
I'm going to put them in pots though (to start).  I like it that I can cut
them and put them in vases in the house.  I have to have something to put in
all the pretty vases I have.  I've ordered a Purple Chariot Miniature, Fairy
Polyantha, Red Fairy Polyantha, Cancun Hybrid Tea Rose (this is gorgeous),
and Yellow Magic Rose (for borders). Those hibiscus are pretty but they only
last one day.  Uh oh, I'm turning into Mother!!!!!

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	01/03/2001 03:14 PM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Your Birthday

Sounds good.  I prefer to keep it kind of small, if that's ok with you.

Thanks,

Kay

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 01/03/2001 03:08 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Your Birthday

Dan and I (so far) would like to take you to lunch on your birthday.   I see
you are free on your calendar, but I didn't know if you already have
tentative plans.  Would you like to go?


Gentlemen,

 John Norden will be in Sydney on Monday morning to evaluate the IT process.
He will coordinate with Stinson.

 Spoke to Vince K today and asked if he would send Stinson Gibner to Sidney
to be available on Monday to review the X system.
Paul, make sure our X friends are available and the Confidentially Agreement
is signed.  Further, I spoke to Phillip B. about a technical going too.

G'day mates,

Gary


Steven (and all):

I reviewed the draft and have the following comments which I have already
communicated to Diane Fellman, before I realized that you asked for comments
to go through you.

1.  Might want to further clarify that the scope of issues addressing
disposition, whether or not the Commission grants an OII, should address
environmental review, market power and interim credit.  This should go into
the Introductory section.
2.  Page 6, Data that is of a non-confidential nature should be publically
available.  Data which  is confidential should be available to bidders
subject to a confidentiality agreement.  PG&E should also consider other
means to access such data other than through visiting the data room, ie.
electronically.
3.  Page 9, CAPPA, in addition to determine whether or not it is appropriate
for the utility to retain the contracts, the Commission should require that
PG&E value these assets, in accordance w/ the draft decision (should be voted
out on Thursday) and in compliance w/ the statute which requires the net
valuation of all above and below market assets.
4.  I understand the reason for pursuing interim credit vs. interim
valuation.  It is likely to become a semantic discussion though.
5.  Suggested that you include the basis of evaluating bids as between
individual bundles and watershed.

Please call me if you have comments/questions.  415-782-7821

"Steven Kelly" <steven@iepa.com> on 11/01/99 07:06:13 AM
Please respond to "Steven Kelly" <steven@iepa.com>

To:	Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, "Jake M. Rudisill" <jake@calpine.com>, "Bill
Woods" <billw@calpine.com>, "William F Hall III" <wfhall2@duke-energy.com>,
"Curtis Kebler" <Curtis_l_Kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "Steve Ponder"
<steve_ponder@fpl.com>
cc:

Subject:	Draft IEP Hydro Comments:  Including Attachment

Oops!  I forgot the attachment.
 - att1.htm
 - Hydro - IEP Limited Protest to PG&E - Draft  11-1-99.rtf


Sara;

Are you also involved in EnronOnLine ?  I only got a copy of an EOL summary
but would like to receive a more detailed memo about such business.  Can you
provide me with any additional materials ?!

Thanks,

Sami

Sara Shackleton@ECT
05/04/2000 04:29 PM
To: Sami Arap/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Andrea Calo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Re: Financial Trading in Brazil

Hi, Sami!  Sorry we missed the call yesterday.  I just wanted to update you
on some of the financial trading issues in Brazil (and I have added you to
the working group list).  I am going to finalize our "swap matrix" for
Brazil.  On the physical trading side, I had asked a physical trading lawyer
to call you and am wondering if Elizabeth Sager ever called or emailed.
Please let me know.  Thanks.  Sara
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 05/04/2000
02:55 PM ---------------------------

"MBTOS - Marcelo Rodrigues" <Mbtos@tozzini.com.br> on 05/04/2000 01:21:59 PM
To: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com
cc: Andrea.Bertone@enron.com, Brent.Hendry@enron.com, Lynn.Aven@enron.com,
Rick.Hopkinson@enron.com, afac@tozzini.com.br, Krishna@tozzini.com.br
Subject: Re: Financial Trading in Brazil

Dear Sara:

Thank you for your message below. Please find attached hereto free
translation into English of new foreign investor's regulations in Brazil. We
are preparing a memo to you in connection with such new regulations and are
finalizing the matrix prepared last year. We will send them to you shortly.

Kind regards,

Marcelo Rodrigues

>>> "Sara Shackleton" <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com> 05/04 12:08 pm >>>

AFAC and Marcelo:  I hope this message finds you both well.  I would like to
finalize the matrix which was prepared last year so that we can create a
"baseline" for future updates.  Please feel free to date the matrix as of
December, 1999, if you wish.  Please forward any recent changes to me for
comment  and I will respond immediately.  Then we can move on to other things!
Thanks for your help and attention to this mattter.  Regards.  Sara
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 05/04/2000
10:34
AM ---------------------------

"MBTOS - Marcelo Rodrigues" <Mbtos@tozzini.com.br> on 03/13/2000 06:27:26 PM

To:   Sara.Shackleton@enron.com
cc:   Brent.Hendry@enron.com, Lynn.Aven@enron.com, afac@tozzini.com.br
Subject:  Re: Financial Trading in Brazil

Dear Sara:

Thank you for your E-mail below. We will be reflecting the new changes in the
regulations in the chart and will be sending it to your review as soon as
possible.

Kind regards,

Marcelo Rodrigues

>>> "Sara Shackleton" <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com> 03/13 2:29 pm >>>

Greetings to you both!  It has been awhile since we last spoke.  I would like
to
finalize the matrix which we have been discussing since the latter part of
1999.
Although we were awaiting new Central Bank regulations, I am beginning to
think
that the Central Bank revisions will not impact the matrix except with respect
to transactions which may be entered into by entities that are the subject of
the Central Bank regulations.  Please let me know whether or not you agree or
can offer any suggestions.  Thanks and regards.  Sara

 - Res2689a.doc
 - Ins325a.doc


On Equitrans - please match deal 136019 with 204769.

Thanks


I will be getting out my Rice and Texas applications on Tuesday the 21st, so
if your able to complete these recommendation forms before or on Tuesday I
would greatly appreciate it.  I leave for a Christmas vacation on Wednesday
and wanted to get it out before I left.  If your not able to please let me
know and I'll adjust my time frame.  Thanks again for taking the time to
write these recommendations for me.
Ben


done

Jackie Young
02/03/2000 10:13 AM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: 98-3405 Activity Being Allocated/Nomed @ 98-9643

Daren,

Wanted to let you know that there are still two sitara deals that need to
have the expected volume brought down to "0" of the list that I previously
sent you.
They are 114099 and 92918.

I appreciate you revising the ones that you have and you probably were going
to handle the above two today.  In case you were please disregard this
notice.  If you had fogotten, this can serve as reminder.

As usual, thanks for your help.

-Jackie-
3-9497


I just wanted to check for one of our British attorneys who is coming into
town next month to confirm he is registered for a seminar.  Do you have Mark
Elliott registered for Derivatives I on August 8 and 9.  Can you confirm this
for me so I can confirm it for him.  Thanks!


okey dokey.  Aren't  you on holiday?


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Winfree, O'Neal D.
Sent:	Wednesday, January 02, 2002 11:17 AM
To:	Martin, Thomas A.
Subject:	Texas Customers


Dale,

Thanks for your message. In our phone conversation before the meeting  you
mentioned
another contractual arrangement under which we could work with  your  company
employees on a case-study.

The cost of a weekly project  would be $12,000 that would be applied to the
purchase price should
we go ahead and decide to acquire the software. This project would allow us
to evaluate the model and
come up with an estimate of the manpower necessary to support  the model
internally.

Please, let me know more about this option.

We are primarily interested in a long-term natural gas model and the database
for North America.
Unless a familiarity with the short term model is a prerequisite, we don't
have resources to spend too much time on it.

Of course, a trading desk may be interested in the short term
version of the model. I shall talk to them about it.

Vince

"Dale M. Nesbitt" <dale.nesbitt@worldnet.att.net> on 11/13/2000 06:00:05 PM
To: <john.goodpasture@enron.com>, "Vince. J. Kaminski"
<Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: MarketPoint License Agreement

John/Vince:

I really enjoyed the meeting the other day with you and a broad cross
section of your people.  Thank you very much for setting it up, and thank
you for giving me the opportunity to speak with your people.

As I mentioned to John, I am sending you the license paperwork for
MarketPoint.  I have attached our standard license agreement for your
consideration.  As I mentioned, the license agreement covers the entire
bundled product, which includes

? North American gas, short and long term
? North American electricity, short and long term
? World gas
? Western European gas
? World oil

We are just finishing porting the world oil, world gas, and western European
gas models over from our old (now obsolete) software system into
MarketPoint, so they will not be fully tested and complete for a couple of
months.  However, the gas and electricity models for North America are
presently complete and tested.  That should allow us to give you an
attractive price before the full worldwide toolkit is available throughout
your worldwide business.

As I understood it, you will want the gas modeling capability first and will
want to defer decisions on electric or other capability.  As I mentioned at
the meeting, we are prepared to offer that for approximately
 the fully
bundled price.  As you read the license agreement, you will see that the
software licenses for $100,000 annually, the gas data for $5,000, and the
electric data for $10,000.  MarketPoint will agree to license you the gas
model plus the data for
 the software license plus the data license for a
total of $55,000 annually.  This is just under
 the fully bundled price.  I
think that is consistent with the discussions at our meeting, and from
MarketPoint,s perspective would provide a great basis to move forward
together with Enron.  If or when Enron ever desires to &scale up8 to another
model or model(s) from the MarketPoint portfolio, we will simply scale you
up to the entire license agreement.  This will allow you to decouple the gas
decision from any other decisions you might make.  (I will be glad to put
this additional pricing provision into the agreement if you decide to move
forward.)

I felt I was able to communicate the philosophy, scope, and operation of our
approach during the meeting and to deliver you much of the information you
might need to evaluate whether MarketPoint meets your needs.  I thought you
were able to see the depth and sophistication of the product yet at the same
time its simplicity and effectiveness.  I thought you were able to see the
benefits of the MarketPoint dimension of economic equilibrium as a
complement and supplement to other approaches you will assuredly use.  I
would be interested in your impressions and those of your colleagues.  I
look forward to your response and to moving ahead together.  We view you as
a very important prospective customer and client and will work with you to
earn and secure your business.

If you decide to license MarketPoint, we can arrange to transfer and mount
MarketPoint and the short term NARG model (which is the model we suggest you
begin with) and travel to Houston to deliver our 1
 day training seminar.
Our clients are usually very fluent after that 1
 day training seminar.
Thereafter, we would want you to work with the short term NARG model for a
few weeks while you get up to speed, very fluent, and very comfortable
before you take delivery of the longer term version of NARG several weeks
later.

Thanks again, and all the best.  If there is some item from the meeting that
I might have forgotten to send, please remind me.  My notes don't show
anything, but I was speaking a lot rather than writing notes during the
meeting and might have overlooked something someone wanted.

Dale Nesbitt
President
MarketPoint Inc.
27121 Adonna Ct.
Los Altos Hills, CA  94022
(650)218-3069
dale.nesbitt@marketpointinc.com
 - LICENSE.DOC


Jeff,

I was talking with my boss and the VP of BizDev at my company, and mentioned
Casbah and Perfect, briefly mentioning what they did.  They seemed excited
by the idea and want to talk with the guys at Perfect.  Of course, I did not
tell them any more than is already published on Casbah's website, and I made
it clear to them that I had signed an NDA.  Do you think it would be OK if
my VP BizDev called the guys @ Perfect to discuss a potential alliance?

Also we need to let Perfect know that I'm working at Versata, and make sure
that there is no conflict of interest.

Let me know your thoughts ASAP.

Aiaz

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2000 4:14 PM
To: Aiaz_Kazi@versata.com
Cc: jdasovic@enron.com; sama@haas.berkeley.edu; davis@haas.berkeley.edu;
Aiaz_Kazi@versata.com
Subject: RE: Any Chance of Meeting

Ok,  I just got a note from Mike who said he'd like to meet for lunch and
an afternoon meeting next week.  Does that work for folks?  Say, Friday?
Please advise.

Unfortunately, I was sort of hoping to meet on Sunday, but Saturday may
work.

Are you guys in class tonite?  If so, let's talk then.

Aiaz Kazi <Aiaz_Kazi@versata.com> on 04/05/2000 09:03:52 AM

To:   "'Jeff Dasovich'" <jdasovic@enron.com>, sama@haas.berkeley.edu,
      davis@haas.berkeley.edu, Aiaz Kazi <Aiaz_Kazi@versata.com>
cc:
Subject:  RE: Any Chance of Meeting

Lets get things started with a conference call to Cheryl.  This will ensure
that we don't take up too much of Mike's time.

Also, what time are we planning to meet this weekend ? How about 11 am
Saturday? Alternatively, we could split it up with Kelly and I meeting in
Berkeley, and you guys hooking up in the city.  I cannot do Sunday, so let
me know if Saturday works.  Maybe we can do the call on Saturday, in which
case we have to be prepared with a set of questions.

Aiaz

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Dasovich [mailto:jdasovic@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2000 3:43 PM
To: sama@haas.berkeley.edu; davis@haas.berkeley.edu;
Aiaz_Kazi@versata.com
Subject: RE: Any Chance of Meeting

FYI.  Should we try to do a call with Cheryl this week, or shoot for Mike
when
he gets back on the 10th?  I've sneaking suspicion things will be more
productive with Mike.  Whatever you folks would like to do's fine with me.

Best,
Jeff
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES on 04/04/2000
03:40 PM
---------------------------

Mike Davenport <mike@perfect.com> on 04/03/2000 07:10:30 PM

To:   "'Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com '" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  RE: Any Chance of Meeting

Jeff,

Sorry I missed you as well.  Unfortunately, I am currently out of the
office...yet again...on a personal vacation....in Kauai..the islands send
their greetings. My business trip to Palm Springs was great, but I was only
in the office for a couple of days before my vacation started.

I'll be back in the office April 10.  If you want to chat sooner than the
10th and check out our demo, you can give Cherryl Ricketts a call and she
should be able to help you out.  I don't remember her direct number, so you
can call our general number 650-858-1000 and ask for her.  Otherwise, I'll
be happy to chat as soon as I return to the office on the 10th.

Take care,

Mike D.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com
To: mike@perfect.com
Sent: 4/3/00 4:38 PM
Subject: Any Chance of Meeting

Greetings Mike:  Hope your travels were good.  Any chance of getting
together in person or by phone this week?   Also, we were interested in
mucking around with the demo.  I'm assuming we'd need to do that in your
offices, rather than remotely.  Would it be possible to play around with
the demo?  Hope all is well.

Best,
Jeff


This is to advise you that Stan is required to attend an Enron off-site meeting the afternoon of October 24; therefore, we will need to reschedule our half day staff meeting.      Please be aware that it may be rescheduled on short notice and you may need to clear your calendar to accommodate, and I apologize to you in advance for that inconvenience!

I will be in communication.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Cindy Stark
Executive Assistant to Stan Horton
Tel:   713/853-6197
Fax:  713/345-7047
Cindy.Stark@enron.com


Tana,
I'm with Risk Assessment and Control and I'm currently not trading in the
account.  (It is an old account that was opened before I started at Enron.  I
haven't traded in it because Enron appears to trade in everything! )
However, since I have you,  I am currently considering buying some options in
soybeans. Would this be against Enron policy?
Thanks,
Frank

From: Tana Jones@ECT on 06/29/2000 01:17 PM
To: Frank Hayden/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Financial Interest in Commodity Futures Account

Thanks for your response.  Yes, I I do need to know two things.  First, the
group you are in, and then second, what products you are trading out of the
account.  The Enron Trading Policy prohibits employees from trading in any of
the products the company trades in.

Thanks!

	Frank Hayden@ENRON
	06/29/2000 01:04 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Financial Interest in Commodity Futures Account

Tana,
Pursuant to an email from Mark Taylor, I am notifying you that I have a
financial interest in a Commodity Futures Account.
Let me know if there is any additional information your require.
Thanks,
Frank


Sally and Lisa,
I will be doing the budget for my RC.
Sheila


Here are the P&L file and positions.

I will be on vacation next week, Kam will be covering for me.  Thanks.
PL


FirstEnergy System (FIRSTENESY) has assigned its transmission assets and
service agreements to American Transmission Systems, Inc.  (ATSI)  They are a
subsidiary of FirstEnergy Corp.  Their mnemonic reference changed from "FE"
to "ATSI."


I inadvertently forgot to "Reply to All" when I sent this response to
Charla.

Michelle
---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 05/04/2000 10:44
AM ---------------------------

Michelle Cash
05/04/2000 10:41 AM
To: Charla Reese/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: Re: International Information - GIS

Hi, Charla,

I have reviewed the additional fields you described.  Most of them look fine
with me.  I do have some concerns with the questions about birthplace,
citizenship, personal travel, and reason for return from prior assignment.

The questions about birthplace/citizenship are the most risky.  As I have
discussed with others, such questions could create issues of national origin
discrimination, particularly if one's birthplace country is not evident from
any other source.  It also could create a privacy issue if we are asking
questions that are not job-related and consistent with business necessity.
What is the purpose of this inquiry?  Are we trying to determine whether  a
person is eligible to work in a particular country?  If so, it appears that
birthplace and citizenship are not the answers that we need.  We already have
a field on where a person is eligible to work, which would cover the
situation where a person has citizenship in one country, but is on a work
visa to another.   Any other information may not be necessary.

The question about reasons for returning from leave also could unearth
information that we really don't want to keep on a system.  For example, if a
person left because of health reasons, or the birth of a child . . . it
really is not a job-related issue.  What is the purpose of this question?  Is
there a less intrusive way to ask it?

Finally, the question about countries visited for personal reasons also is
asking information that is not job-related.  What is the purpose of that
inquiry?  Is there another way to gather that information?

Let me stress that none of these inquiries is unlawful -- some of them may be
unwise for the reasons I cited above.  If you would like to discuss this
further, please give me a call.

Michelle

Charla Reese@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
05/02/2000 08:34 PM
To: Michelle Cash@ECT, Sharon Butcher@ENRON
cc: Twanda Sweet@ECT, Ava Syon@ENRON, Jane Allen, Timothy
Callahan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: International Information - GIS

Sharon / Michelle

As it has been approximately six weeks from my original request, could you
please advise what timeframe we should expect this request to be completed?
We would like to move forward with enhancements to GIS this quarter.  Please
let me know if there is someone else I should be contacting - thank you!

Charla
x69675
---------------------- Forwarded by Charla Reese/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
05/02/2000 08:28 PM ---------------------------

Charla Reese
04/05/2000 11:46 AM
To: Michelle Cash@ECT, Sharon Butcher@ENRON
cc: Jane Allen

Subject: International Information - GIS

Just wanted to touch base with you to see if you had any questions re: the
attached message and check on what timeline we should expect for legal
approval.

Thanks!

Charla
x58293
---------------------- Forwarded by Charla Reese/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
03/30/2000 11:27 AM ---------------------------

Charla Reese
03/23/2000 10:43 AM
To: Michelle Cash@ECT, Sharon Butcher@ENRON
cc: Jane Allen

Subject: International Information - GIS

Michelle / Sharon

We would like to include the following fields in GIS to support our
International Human Resources efforts.  Could you please review for global
legality issues?

Thank you!

Charla
x58293

---------------------- Forwarded by Charla Reese/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
03/23/2000 10:41 AM ---------------------------

Charla Reese
03/22/2000 10:06 AM
To: Kathryn Schultea@Enron
cc: Jane Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Timothy Callahan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: International Information - GIS

Kathy

As we move forward with enhancements to GIS, the International HR group would
like to capture the following valuable information related to international
skills sets:

Demographics
Birth Place (Country)
Current Residence (Country)
Citizenship (Country)
Passport (# / Issuing Country)

Mobility
Authorization to Work (Countries)
Travel Availability (% Domestic / % International)
Relocation Availability (Y/N)
Relocation Preferences (Countries)

Global Exposure
Countries Visited (Business vs. Leisure - Length of Visit)
Current International Assignee (Y/N)
Current Assignment Location
Former International Assignee (Y/N)
Location and Length of Past Assignment(s)
Reason for Return (As Scheduled, Premature - Change in Business Strategy,
Premature - Personal, Other)

Jane - is there anything you wish to add or change at this point?

Tim - I will run these by Mike to see what SAP can incorporate in the future
(particularly Demographics).

Kathy - Please advise how you envision this process to work; it might be a
good idea to discuss the various ways this information could be laid out -
thanks!

Charla
x58293


Sally, Greg Piper wanted me to let you know he will be attending the customer meeting July 21-23.

Thank you,

Lisa A. Costello
Assistant to Robert Jones
Enron Networks HR
713/853-1819
lisa.costello@enron.com


Hello Ladies!

I've talked to all of you and you all have expressed interest in
co-hostessing (if that is a word) Tripp's baby shower. I just wanted to send
out an initial email to let you know where we are and a date.

*	After perusing a calender and talking with Tripp, the planned date
is Saturday, November 10th. (I know the time between Thanksgiving and New
Years is crazy for everyone and right after New Years is cutting it close
since Tripp is due Jan. 20th plus or minus 2 weeks.)

*	It will be a brunch (11-1ish).

*	Tripp will send me an invitation list around October 1st.

*	At this point, Tripp is undecided on whether it will be just a girls
shower or a couples shower.

*	Tripp is thinking that it may be about 15 people max.

*	The default venue will be my place; however, Susan has offered to
use her place which I may need to take her up on because our living room is
really only good for 10 people max. Susan are you still okay with that?

As we get closer, I will send out a list of things we need to do and let you
pick what you want to do. Or let me know before then if there is anything
you are dying to do.

See you soon!

  _____

Pam Macaul
Information Developer
713.918.3938
2.1427A

  _____


Irena,

Thanks,

Errol

	From:  Irena D Hogan @ ECT                           03/27/2001 09:25 AM

To: John Valdes/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam
Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russ Severson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Greg Couch/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martha
Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sunjay Arya/NA/Enron,
Francisco deJesus/NA/Enron
cc: Janet De La Paz/HR/Corp/Enron

Subject: Risk Management Objectives Meeting

---------------------- Forwarded by Irena D Hogan/HOU/ECT on 03/27/2001 09:22
AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Irena D Hogan                           03/22/2001 05:05 PM

To: John Valdes/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam
Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russ Severson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Greg Couch/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martha
Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Elizabeth Soto/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Risk Management Objectives Meeting

The Risk Management Objectives meeting has been rescheduled.  Because of this
meeting, there
 will not be a staff meeting for the week of April 9.  This meeting is
scheduled to take place as follows:

    Tuesday, April 10, 2001
     9:00 AM - 11:30 AM
                EB49C1

Attached, please see the new presentation format that Jeff wants to be used.
If you need any help putting
your presentation together, please let me know.

Thank you,

Irena
x36143


Steve:  FYI.  Don't worry about the conference call, but thought it might be
useful to review the proposals prior to Monday's meeting.

See you Monday.

Happy Thanksgiving to all.

Best,
Jeff

******************************************************************************
**************************************

Several IEP companies have been invited to a meeting with the Governor,s
staff next Monday, November 27th.
The following are some options, which the Governor,s office is considering.
IEP is doing some preliminary research on some of these topics.  IEP would
like to arrange a teleconference call around noon on Monday, November 27th to
discuss the Governor,s meeting.  Please advise us as to whether your have
been invited, and who you are sending.
California,s electricity supply situation has two inter-related problems )
(1) high wholesale electricity costs, and (2) marginally adequate supply of
generation ) both have combined to create a dysfunctional wholesale
electricity market.  The goals should be:
 To assure reliable electricity to California consumers for the lowest
reasonable cost.
o Consider requiring that all in-state generation be sold in state.
o Consider re-asserting state authority over the operation, maintenance and
safety practices of all in-state generating facilities, for public health and
safety purposes.
o Consider developing a state power authority to build generation and
own/operate transmission.
o Consider requiring utilities both to retain existing and to build new
generation.
o Consider providing utilities with authority to stabilize retail prices to
be paid by consumers through development of an energy portfolio that reduces
exposure to spot markets, including contracting forward for much more of
their unmet power needs.
o Consider extending consumer rate freeze.
o Consider centralizing power plant dispatch like the other ISOs in the rest
of the country.
o Consider eliminating the ISO and assigning its functions to either a state
or private entity that can acquire the transmission facilities, and control
the electricity transmission grid (MUNIs have proposed this).
o Consider sponsoring/supporting legislation to change the ISO and PX boards
to increase accountability.
o Expand energy conservation programs focused both on immediate peak demand
reduction and on longer term, broader-based programs.
o Aggressively work to site new generation and transmission facilities, to
streamline permitting, and to develop renewable resources.
o Call for/sponsor federal FERC reform legislation that would:
o Impose a regional price cap that varies by time of day and year;
o Set requirements for FERC to use its retroactive refund authority;
o Improve FERC enforcement over price gouging practices;
o Affirm the role of states to protect their customers from unjust prices.
o Pressure the FERC to do its job to (1) bring about responsible seller
behavior in wholesale electric markets through price controls and other
market interventions as necessary, and (2) provide refunds to affected
consumers.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 11/22/2000 03:44 PM -----

	Susan J Mara
	11/22/2000 03:05 PM

		 To: "CHUDSON" <carol@iepa.com>
		 cc: "Andy Brown \(E-mail\)" <abb@eslawfirm.com>, chudson@iepa.com, "Curtis
Kebler \(E-mail\)" <curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "Delaney Hunter
\(E-mail\)" <dhunter@smithandkempton.com>, "Greg Blue \(E-mail\)"
<gtbl@dynegy.com>, "Jack Pigott \(E-mail\)" <jackp@calpine.com>, "Jeff
Dasovich \(E-mail\)" <jdasovic@enron.com>, "Joe Ronan \(E-mail\)"
<joer@calpine.com>, "John Stout \(E-mail\)" <John_H_Stout@reliantenergy.com>,
jparker@HMOT.com, "Katie Kaplan \(E-mail\)" <kaplan@iepa.com>,
kelly@hnks.com, "Kelly Norton \(E-mail\)" <knorton@mcnallytemple.com>, "Lynn
Lednicky \(E-mail\)" <lale@dynegy.com>, marie_moretti@msn.com,
mrmonagan@aol.com, "Bob Weisenmiller \(E-mail\)" <rbw@mrwassoc.com>, "Bob
Escalante \(E-mail\)" <rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "Rob Lamkin \(E-mail\)"
<rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, "Jan Smutny-Jones \(E-mail\)" <smutny@iepa.com>,
"Steven Kelly \(E-mail\)" <steven@iepa.com>, "Susan J Mara \(E-mail\)"
<Susan_J_Mara@enron.com>, "McNally Temple Assn. Inc. \(Business
Fax\)"@mail.cwo.com
		 Subject: Re:

Jeff Dasovich and Steve Kean are attending.  Someone can be on a call -- me
if no one else -- if Jeff and Steve are travelling at the time. Hey, does the
Governor have to fly coach?

	"CHUDSON" <carol@iepa.com>
	11/22/2000 12:47 PM

		 To: "Katie Kaplan \(E-mail\)" <kaplan@iepa.com>, "Jeff Dasovich \(E-mail\)"
<jdasovic@enron.com>, "Kelly Norton \(E-mail\)" <knorton@mcnallytemple.com>,
"John Stout \(E-mail\)" <John_H_Stout@reliantenergy.com>, "Curtis Kebler
\(E-mail\)" <curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "Rob Lamkin \(E-mail\)"
<rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, "Bob Weisenmiller \(E-mail\)"
<rbw@mrwassoc.com>, "Susan J Mara \(E-mail\)" <Susan_J_Mara@enron.com>, "Andy
Brown \(E-mail\)" <abb@eslawfirm.com>, "Bob Escalante \(E-mail\)"
<rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "Greg Blue \(E-mail\)" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "Jack
Pigott \(E-mail\)" <jackp@calpine.com>, "Jan Smutny-Jones \(E-mail\)"
<smutny@iepa.com>, "Joe Ronan \(E-mail\)" <joer@calpine.com>, "Lynn Lednicky
\(E-mail\)" <lale@dynegy.com>, "McNally Temple Assn. Inc. \(Business
Fax\)"@mail.cwo.com, "Steven Kelly \(E-mail\)" <steven@iepa.com>, "Susan J
Mara \(E-mail\)" <Susan_J_Mara@enron.com>, <mrmonagan@aol.com>,
<marie_moretti@msn.com>, "Delaney Hunter \(E-mail\)"
<dhunter@smithandkempton.com>, <kelly@hnks.com>, <jparker@HMOT.com>,
<chudson@iepa.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject:

Jan Smutny-Jones, Exec Dir
Independent Energy Producers Assn.
1112 I Street, Suite 380
Sacramento, CA 95814
PH: 916-448-9499
FX: 916-448-0182
iepa@iepa.com

 - Govs meeting Conf Call.doc


Good summary. Tim, does your draft plan now require a new iteration?

Mike Jordan
24/07/2000 10:38
To: Tim Poullain-Patterson/LON/ECT@ECT, Richard Sage/LON/ECT@ECT, Fernley
Dyson/LON/ECT@ECT, Phil Redman/LON/ECT@ECT, Andrew Cornfield/LON/ECT@ECT,
Alex Holland/LON/ECT@ECT, Ralph Jaeger/FRA/ECT@ECT, Naomi
Connell/LON/ECT@ECT, Shona Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron, Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, "Kevin Rhodes" <krhodes@mgltd.com> @ ENRON, Beth
Apollo/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephen Wood/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: MG Middle Office Integration Issues and timetable

To all

Tim has delivered the initial microsoft project plan for the MO integration -
this is available to all via the integration project 'office' - i.e. Richard
and Phil.

I summarise the key themes as :-

summary operational risk assessment across all MG entities and functional
groups ( as defined within the DPR )
defining MO organisational structure and fit with Enron's control model -
particularly logistics and co-ordination
interaction with Fin Ops processes
month end consolidation process
SAP implementation
working capital and revenue forecasting
interaction with RAC re VAR / trading limits ( market and credit )
awaiting notice of trading limits
credit counterparty review and set up within GCP
VAR methodology implementation
interaction with IT re systems development/maintenance
AS 400 development timetable and roll out to NY for WANG replacement
MITS/EOL migration
Use of Enlighten in application architecture
defined IT resource requirement
interaction with Legal re Enron Metals name change and related documentation
issues
MO integration planning for settlements and trade accounting

The focus and objectives relating to the above for this week are as follows :-

review of London processes and define boundaries for segregation of duties
implementation ( Action TPP ) - also discuss extension to NY ( SWilson )
review of Wolff activities in Germany ( Action KR/AC )
continuing review of new recycling yards ( project Cook ) in Germany ( Action
AH/RJ )
review interdependencies between MO/Fin Ops/RAC/Systems integration plans (
Action MJ/RS )
document current assessment of operational risk with particular emphasis on
Wolff and Recycling businesses ( Action MJ with KR/AC/AH/RJ/TPP/SW )
Brainstorm month end accounting close and potential earnings election for
consolidation ( Action  TPP/MJ/BA/SWood )

Mike


ENA's bid for the package of 10,000 mmbtu/day from W Tx pool to PG&E Topock is $2.03 for April - October time frame, $2.25 for the April - Jan.

Please advise of outcome ASAP.

Regards,

Stephanie
713 853-1688


Attached is a summary of the last two meetings of the External Accountability
Subcommittee meetings.  Included is the draft work plan - please review the
work plan and convey any comments to Jean and copy me.  Also, you have
committed to giving me your stakeholder lists by tomorrow, Friday 3/30 for
the Stakeholder Perception survey.  If you have any questions or difficulties
with this, please call me.

Also, we have added a new section on the EHS/Corporate Responsibility
intranet site with "news and information" on corporate responsibility-related
topics. The home page is: http://ehs.corp.enron.com and once you pass the
animation, etc. you can click on "Corporate Responsibility" for specific
information and materials.  Suggestions for content is always welcome!

Thank you for your participation and efforts,
Catherine

Catherine McKalip-Thompson
Manager, Environmental Responsibility
Enron Corp.
101 California Street, Suite 1950
San Francisco, CA 94111
Tel: 415.782.7842
Fax: 415.782.7854


Sheila:  Please send an email to Ted Murphy and Bill Bradford requesting
agreements with Deutsche Bank Securities.
Which Enron company(ies) are you requesting these agreements for?
Stephanie Panus will be handling this broker.
Thanks.  Sara


The TDS IT group needs your approval to start work on some enhancements to the TDS Deal Ticker.

TDS currently is not valuing physical changed deals correctly.

                          Change deal valuation is based on current value vs the value from the previous night port calc.   However since CPR numbers can change
                          when the deal is revised, it does not have a exact previous valuation to compare to. Resulting in full deal value displaying as the change.
                          Bill has a concept to base Change Deal Value on the whole Sitara deal rather than the individual CPR tickets.

TDS does not value correctly deals priced to the desk at Mid

                          Current valuation does not take physical premium into effect.  Not a large value effect unless the physical premium is large,
                          such as IF-NGPL/Harper, that has a premium of $.22.
                          The CPR reader can be changed to include the Mid Market Flag that CPR has.  Valuation can then include premium into the calc.


Dan ---

Sithe had one last change to make under their signature block.  Could you add
to our document
and initial 2 originals again.  I will pick up the originals as soon as you
are done.

Thanks,
Ruth
---------------------- Forwarded by Ruth Concannon/HOU/ECT on 12/05/2000
12:15 PM ---------------------------

"Oliver, Jason" <joliver@Sithe.com> on 12/05/2000 11:00:46 AM
To: "'Ruth.Concannon@enron.com'" <Ruth.Concannon@enron.com>
cc: "'Jeff.Donahue@enron.com'" <Jeff.Donahue@enron.com>,
"'Todd.Busby@enron.com'" <Todd.Busby@enron.com>
Subject: RE: Transaction agreement

I have attached a corrected version.? The only difference is having the
correct date in the header of pages 2 and 3 and adding "By:?
Sithe/Independence, Inc. its General Partner" in the signature section under
"SITHE/INDEPENDENCE POWER PATNERS, L.P."

Regards,

Jason

-----Original Message-----
From: Oliver, Jason
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 10:42 AM
To: 'Ruth.Concannon@enron.com'
Cc: Jeff.Donahue@enron.com; Todd.Busby@enron.com
Subject: Transaction agreement

Here is the Transaction Agreement which reflects yesterday's deal.

?
 - Sithe Resale Dec Off 12-4-00.doc


Market Participants,

Yesterday at the Market Issues Forum, we presented a discussion on long-term
price cap authority.  This is a matter for discussion now because the
previously granted authority from FERC expires on Nov. 15, 2000.  Attached
is the white paper discussing this topic.  We will seek Board approval on
this matter at the September 6-7 Board meeting.  If you have comments on
this paper, please forward them to Keith Casey at kcasey@caiso.com.

Don Fuller
Director, Client Relations

>  <<DMA.Price-Cap.Aug10.final.doc>>
>
>

 - DMA.Price-Cap.Aug10.final.doc


We are moving forward to transfer the positions from the emissions books (SO2
and NOx) to the coal group at close of business 5/23/00.  The SO2 marks for
both the underlying and volatility positions currently in the 2007 through
2010 timeframe create a value differential of $2.6 million between our
evaluation and their marks.  For the sake of not continuing the unproductive
task of negotiating this value, we will move forward to transfer despite our
differences.

I strongly recommend continuing to use and pay for all personnel in risk,
documentation and settlement that currently perform these duties for
emissions.
I would like to utilize these resources until further notice.  I am not
comfortable committing to any transfer of risk, documentation and settlement
duties until we have the time to evaluate this further.  I would appreciate
if you could help on this matter to ensure a smooth transition.

KJM


-----Original Message-----
From: Shackleton, Sara
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 9:04 PM
To: SamChawk@aol.com@ENRON
Subject: RE: Sam Chawkin

Sam: (1) I'll be fine.  I survived the first round of layoffs today (what luck?).
(2)N/A
Thanks for thinking of me.  Hope you're doing well.  My niece wants to go to Emory.
Sara

-----Original Message-----
From:	SamChawk@aol.com@ENRON
Sent:	Mon 12/3/2001 7:58 PM
To:	Shackleton, Sara
Cc:
Subject:	Sam Chawkin

Sara - Please let me know if you are going to be ok in all the upheaval and
if you will ever agree to see me? (those are 2 separate inquiries).   Sam


I thought you were supposed to have your toes in the sand in Florida.

I'll have to check with Kathleen on the details of the documentation for the
various development companies.  If there are a couple most active we can put
those on the top of the list.

Kay

	From:  Ann Elizabeth White @ ECT                           04/03/2001 11:43 AM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kathleen Carnahan
cc:

Subject: Status

What is the status of  Ben Jacoby's appointment as agent and attorney in fact
for the development companies?


Effective March 11th  Valero has not pulled any gas on a 35.0/day
nomination.

  Do you want to arrange a buyback for this activity. There is a buyback
ticket { # 148381} available
  to handle any underage.

  I am being told this interconnect will be down 2-weeks; effective March
11th.


Please attend.

-----Original Message-----
From: Imai, Rika
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 9:25 AM
To: Presto, Kevin M.
Subject: FW: meeting

Please let me know if Dan should attend or if you need more information.

Rika
-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Salter [mailto:dsalter@hgp-inc.com]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 8:45 AM
To: Imai, Rika
Subject: meeting

Rika,
For months we had no meetings, now all of a sudden I'm bringing one up
almost every week.

This meeting Fred said would be very beneficial to attend.  It occurs Nov
1&2, 2001.  It concerns nuclear industry consolidation and deregulation
issues.  It is covering a full range of important issues in our forecasting
analysis including licensing, inspection, enforcement & assessment,
decommissioning, deregulation, etc.

Again, I brought this up to Fred to see if he agreed on the import of this
meeting, and he strongly suggested we attend.

Let me know as soon as possible because it is scheduled for this week.

Thanks,
Dan


I just heard.  It's no problem...I started worrying about showing an overblown income for 2001 and not getting fair treatment with financial aid for school.  The December 31 date works best for me.  Thanks again.

-----Original Message-----
From: Shapiro, Richard
Sent: Mon 11/26/2001 3:48 PM
To: Guerrero, Janel
Cc:
Subject:

We had to leave the severance date at 12/31/01. Sorry.


Although we are in possession of  executed fax copies of the Master Agreement
and Confirm, we need to replace these with originals without  "draft" on the
document.

I can e-mail these documents to you or send directly to Huber.  Please advise.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


-----Original Message-----
From: Kleiner, Michael
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 4:37 PM
To: 'voinorml@bp.com'; 'Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com';
'bruce_kohrs@keyspancanada.com'; Houghton, Brian
Subject: Assignment of transaction no. 1

Everyone;

Attached is a revised assignment agreement which we hope you will find
satisfactory.

Our hope is to have this agreement signed Thursday.  Michelle's fax and
counterpart execution clause should facilitate execution.  Let me know if
you expect any problems with execution.

Gulf Canada Resources Limited
per: Michael P. Kleiner
        Law Department

 <<Enron contract assignment.doc>>

 - Enron contract assignment.doc


We are not going to be able to have the Direct Access call this afternoon at
5:00 p.m. CDT after all.  We will need to schedule this call for tomorrow
morning.  Please send me your availability by reply or I can be reached at
(713) 345-6355.  Thank you for your help.


Start Date: 4/30/01; HourAhead hour: 6;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001043006.txt
Error: Invalid variant type conversion

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTstCA
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/30/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_5001
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/30/01
  TRADING_SC: CALP
  PNT_OF_INTRC: SP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 1
  DEAL_NO: 1


Other than the misspelling of my name. Kate is actually spelled M-A-R-Y.


Please plan on adjusting your PL for the following amount during the month of
November...

Frank