/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Hi Folks,

I know many of you have early deadlines this week so I juggled my schedule
to get these early.   Here's how I see the Rushing Game Matchups this week.

PLEASE NOTE:   See the cheatsheet online www.footballguys.com for exactly
where I rank players and to determine who to start.   I always receive
emails asking me how I can have a guy ranked highly on the cheatsheet but
listed under a matchup that favors the Defense.   Just because one matchup
may be more favorable than another, that doesn't necessarily mean I'd start
the player with the best matchup.   Ahman Green may have a horrible matchup
one week but unless you're sitting on Ricky Williams or Marshall Faulk,
Green's your guy no matter who he's lining up against.   The matchup info is
meant to be just one more tool in your box when it comes to deciding between
players.

Stats are provided by Mike Hall's excellent FLM League Management Software.
http://www.fflm.com/ for more info.   Fantasy Points Allowed by position
numbers are from ESPN.com.
Let's get to it.

Joe

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Locks:  These games feature Defenses that should be overmatched against the
Offense.

Atlanta's Maurice Smith vs Carolina Defense

Smith was upstaged last week by big Bob Christian who looked great on the TD
pass reception and run.   Smith had 43 yards on 19 carries (2.3 ypc)  Keep
an eye on his health as he was nicked in Sunday's game.   Smith has been up
and down but facing this Carolina defense may be what he needs.   The
Panthers are ranked # 31 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4
weeks and # 29 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.   If you've been thinking
about starting Smith, this could be the week.

Green Bay's Ahman Green vs Detroit Defense

Ahman Green was semi quiet running the ball against Atlanta last week
carring 17 times for 62 yards (3.6 ypc)   He'll face a soft defense this
week against the Lions.   Detroit ranks # 26 in Rushing Yards Allowed per
Game over the last 4 weeks and # 24 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.
Green's a sure starter here.

San Diego's LaDainian Tomlinson vs Arizona Defense

Everyone keeps talking about the "rookie wall" and Tomlinson just keeps
plugging.   Sunday, he posted 68 yards on 22 carries (3.1 ypc) plus a TD.
Not bad.   This week, he faces the soft Cardinal defense that ranks # 23 in
Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks and # 28 for the year
in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.   If Tomlinson's been your guy, I'd
certainly start him again here.

Seattle's Shaun Alexander vs Kansas City Defense

Alexander continues to have a bulldog like hold on the starting RB job.
Coach Mike Holmgren is now softening his stance on Ricky Watters' return
saying Watters might be the 3rd down back when he returns.   But even that
seems to be a couple of weeks away.   Alexander is the man.   He'll face a
Chief defense that ranks # 27 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the
last 4 weeks.   Alexander has to be licking his chops though at their # 31
ranking in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Prime Matchups:  These games feature Defenses that should have trouble
stopping the Offense.

Baltimore's Jason Brookins vs Jacksonville Defense

Brookins did a nice job last week against Cleveland carrying the ball 21
times for 89 yards (4.2 ypc)   I'd expect him to improve each week as he
gets more comfortable in the role of #1 RB.   He didn't catch any passes so
that's a little bit of a worry.   This week, he faces a Jacksonville Defense
that did a pretty good against Jerome Bettis last week.   They rank # 21 in
Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks and # 11 in Fantasy
Points Allowed to RBs.   Watch very closely how the team and self appointed
spokesman Shannon Sharpe handle the Elvis Grbac 4 interceptions thing.
Could lead to a more conservative gameplan with a focus on running the ball
more.

Cincinnati's Corey Dillon vs Cleveland Defense

Corey Dillon showed last week why he gets saddled with the inconsistency
rep.   17 carries for 38 yards (2.2 ypc) won't carry your team.   The sad
thing is he's so hard to predict when he'll break out.   This week, he faces
a Cleveland Defense that's ranked # 28 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game
over the last 4 weeks so you'd have to think he has a chance.   The Browns
rank # 22 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs as well.

Chicago's Anthony Thomas vs Minnesota Defense

Thomas didn't make much noise last week with just 58 yards on 23 carries
(2.5 ypc)   Fantasy owners are trying to decide who the real Thomas is.
This week, he'll face a soft Viking defense that ranks # 30 in Rushing Yards
Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks and # 26 in Fantasy Points Allowed to
RBs.   I think we'll see him get back on track.   The Bear passing game will
definitely open up some lanes for him.

Miami's Lamar Smith vs Buffalo Defense

The Lamar Smith woes continue.   He showed glimpses of breaking out but
wound up with 53 yards on 19 carries (2.8 ypc)   I'm not as worried about
Travis Minor stealing too much from him as he only managed 9 yards on 6
carries (1.5 ypc)   This Miami running game has faded quickly.   They'll
face a soft Buffalo defense this week that ranks # 22 in Rushing Yards
Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks and # 25 in Fantasy Points Allowed to
RBs.

New York's Tiki Barber / Ron Dayne vs Oakland Defense

Barber looked very good Monday while Dayne was awful.   Barber rushed 8
times for 55 yards plus he caught 4 passes for 52 yards.   Dayne, on the
other hand, rushed 4 times for a whopping minus 3 ypc.   (NEGATIVE 0.8 ypc)
The Raider defense isn't much ranking # 29 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game
over the last 4 weeks and # 19 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs so this is
probably a good matchup.   At least for Barber.   I'd start Dayne at your
own risk until he shows me something.

New Orleans' Ricky Williams vs New England Defense

Start Ricky Williams.   He's rolling.  120 yards on 28 carries (4.3 ypc)
plus another 48 receiving.   The re-emergence of QB Aaron Brooks is a huge
factor and Ricky should keep it up.   New England ranks # 10 in Rushing
Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks but I wouldn't let that deter
me at all.

San Francisco's Garrison Hearst / Kevan Barlow vs Indianapolis Defense

Hearst continued the miracle story with another fine outing last week.   He
had 92 yards on 17 carries plus he caught 6 passes for 21 yards.   He looks
to be too much for Kevan Barlow to overtake at this point.   Barlow did have
7 carries but it looks pretty clear that Hearst is the guy.  The Colt
defense ranks # 20 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks.
For the year, they rank # 27 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

St. Louis' Marshall Faulk vs Tampa Bay Defense

You don't need me to tell you to start Faulk.   Just do it and count your
blessings that you own one of the best players in the universe.

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Even Matchups:  These games feature no real advantage either way

Arizona's Michael Pittman vs San Diego Defense

Pittman ran pretty hard last week gaining 81 yards on 23 carries (3.5 ypc)
but yielded a TD to Thomas Jones last week.   That's not good.   This
Charger defense is definitely one that can be run on as they rank # 24 in
Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks.   They don't give up
many points though as evidenced by their # 8 ranking for the year in Fantasy
Points Allowed to RBs.   The Arizona offense was clicking last week (albeit
against Detroit) but it's a little unclear as to exactly how Pittman fits
in.

Carolina's Richard Huntley vs Atlanta Defense

Huntley was much more involved this past week and showed his owners some
signs of life.   He rushed 13 times for 63 yards (4.8 ypc) and also caught 5
passes.   Encouraging signs.   This week he faces a Falcon defense that
could be primed for a letdown after the big Green Bay win.   They rank # 25
in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks and # 15 in Fantasy
Points Allowed to RBs.

Dallas' Emmitt Smith vs Denver Defense

Emmitt actually looked pretty good last week returning from injury to post
80 yards on 15 carries (5.3 ypc)   He was nicked late in the game so check
his status this week but he looks like he'll be ok for Thursday's game.
The Broncos rank # 16 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4
weeks but are still pretty strong for the year ranking # 9 in Fantasy Points
Allowed to RBs.

Denver's Mike Anderson vs Dallas Defense

Anderson posted a whopping 31 yards on 13 carries (2.4 ypc) against the
Redskins last week.   Olandis Gary didn't do any better with 28 yards on 10
carries (2.8 ypc)   At this point, you'd have to say the entire Bronco
offense is in disarray.   WR Rod Smith's injury is a huge factor as they're
simply not the same with him less than 100%.   This week, they face a pretty
good defense in Dallas that ranks # 14 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game
over the last 4 weeks.   For the year, they rank # 10 in Fantasy Points
Allowed to RBs.   Being a short week will not help matters.

Indianapolis' Dominic Rhodes vs San Francisco Defense

Dominic Rhodes didn't make anyone forget about Edgerrin James but he did
prove what we all were thinking - Being the # 1 RB for Indy is not a bad
thing.   He got the score and also rolled up 67 yards on 18 carries.   And
he'll likely improve.   Not bad for a guy who probably wasn't drafted in
your league.   The 49er defense is average ranking # 18 in Rushing Yards
Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks.   For the year, they rank # 20 in
Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

Kansas City's Priest Holmes / Tony Richardson vs Seattle Defense

After a bye week of rest, Holmes will see how he fares against the Seahawk
defense.   Seattle ranks # 19 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the
last 4 weeks and # 12 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.   They're nothing
special but they do a nice job of shutting down Travis Henry and Buffalo
last week.

Oakland's Charlie Garner / Tyrone Wheatley vs New York Giants Defense

Everyone (including me) hoped that Charlie Garner would take advantage of
the opportunity with Wheatley out to show he could be a full time # 1 RB.
Just didn't happen.   Now Wheatley is reportedly back and ready to go and
Garner looks to keep running it between the 20s while Wheatley or Zack
Crockett punch it in at the goalline.   Garner still puts the yards up
though.   Sunday, he rushed for 59 yards and caught another 41.   The Giants
defense ranks # 13 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks
and showed last night they can be vulnerable.

Washington's Stephen Davis vs Philadelphia Defense

Stephen Davis continues to roll up the yards.   Last week, he totaled 84
yards on 23 carries (3.7 ypc)   This week, he faces a decent Eagle defense
that ranks # 17 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks and
# 14 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.   Tony Banks will likely be back at
QB although Kent Graham did fine.

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Downside Matchups:  These games feature a Defense that could pose trouble
for the Offense.

Buffalo's Travis Henry / Larry Centers vs Miami Defense

Travis Henry looked pretty bad last week.  13 carries for 29 yards (2.2 ypc)
just isn't going to cut it for you.   Throwing 2 fumbles on top of that
could put his playing time in jeopardy.  Sammy Morris and Shawn Bryson are
champing at the bit.   Don't forget about Larry Centers.   He had 66 yards
receiving on 8 passes Sunday and those are likely valuable stats in your
league.   The Dolphin Defense ranks # 7 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game
over the last 4 weeks so it'll be no cakewalk.

Cleveland's James Jackson / Ben Gay vs Cincinnati Defense

Jackson was a late scratch from Sunday's game and Ben Gay made the most of
his opportunity.   You gotta love this guy.   He's a very hard runner and
while raw, displayed some nice talent.   I'm guessing Gay's play will be the
best "rehab" Jackson could ever receive.   Jackson is reportedly ready to go
against Cincinnati this week.   The Bengals are pretty tough against the run
ranking # 11.   For the year, they rank # 17 in Fantasy Points Allowed to
RBs.

New England's Antowain Smith vs New Orleans Defense

Smith struggled against the Rams Sunday night with 36 yards on 15 carries
(2.4 ypc)   I'd expect tough going again this week against the Saints that
rank # 15 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks and # 13
in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.   New England seems to be coming back to
earth a bit and you know the Tom Brady / Drew Bledsoe thing has to be a
distraction for the team.

Philadelphia's Duce Staley vs Washington Defense

Any worries Duce Staley owners had about Correll Buckhalter stealing time
went up in smoke last week. (sorry)   Staley looked like the Duce of old
rolling up 102 yards on 26 carries.   He threw in 4 receptions for 31 yards
to boot.   Washington is surprisingly tough against the run ranking # 4 in
Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks.   It won't be a
cakewalk but still you have to like Staley with the way they're playing now.

Pittsburgh's Jerome Bettis vs Tennessee Defense

Bettis was held very much in check last week with the exception of one 40
yard run.   Even with the big run, his totals of 52 yards on 21 carries (2.5
ypc) weren't much.   Won't be much easier this week against a good Tennesee
defense that ranks # 6 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4
weeks.   The Titans shut down Corey Dillon last week who has a similar power
style.   I'd have a hard time not starting Bettis though as he's definitely
the focus of this offense and getting better as QB Kordell Stewart continues
to improve.

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Defensive Slam Dunks:  These games feature a very tough Defense posing major
problems for the Offense.

Detroit's James Stewart / Lamont Warren / Corey Schlesinger vs Green Bay
Defense

Talk about a muddy situation.   Last week, Lamont Warren, Corey Schlesinger,
and Rueben Droughns each had at least 6 carries.   And just for good
measure, James Stewart is reportedly ready to play this week.   Throw in the
added bonus that Green Bay is very tough and ranked # 3 in Rushing Yards
Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks.   That's enough to make me shy away
from all these guys.   (That and the fact Charlie Batch may throw it 75
times...)

Jacksonville's Stacey Mack vs Baltimore Defense

As we told our readers today, the news isn't good for Fred Taylor.   His doc
is telling him to stay out of the lineup for this week and they're sounding
way too vague for my liking as to when he'll be back.   That probably means
Mack gets the call by default.   He posted a stellar 6 yard on 8 rushes (0.8
ypc) day.   Yes, ZERO point 8.   Elvis Joseph can run back kicks but he only
managed 6 yards on his 3 carries.   And QB Mark Brunell could miss the game
with his leg injury.   All in all, pretty ugly going against the Ravens
Defense who's fallen down to # 12 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the
last 4 weeks but is still nasty.

Minnesota's Michael Bennett vs Chicago Defense

Bennett got the carries Monday night while Doug Chapman saw no action.
Bennett had 33 yards on 11 carries (3.3 ypc) so you'd have to think he's on
the right track back.   When Culpepper, Moss and Carter play like they did
Monday, it's pretty clear the Vikings won't need a lot from their RB.   This
week he'll face a much tougher opponent in Chicago.   The Bears rank # 5 in
Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks and are playing very
well.   For the year, they rank # 6 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs so
it'll be a tough matchup coming off a short week.

Tampa Bay's Warrick Dunn / Mike Alstott vs St. Louis Defense

Dunn and Alstott put up pitiful numbers Sunday.   Dunn had 12 yards on 8
carries (1.5 ypc)   Alstott had 2 yards on 4 carries (0.5 ypc) although he
did get a score.   Granted, it was against a tough Chicago team but that's
awful.   This week, they'll face an injury riddled St. Louis team that ranks
# 2 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks.   Even with the
injuries, I don't like either of these RBs here.

Tennessee's Eddie George vs Pittsburgh Defense

It's bad when the QB out rushes the # 1 RB but that's what happened last
week.   George put up 61 yards on 23 carries (2.7 ypc) and seemed to take a
step back.   The trouble with him is that his game is so power oriented,
that when the holes aren't there, he simply can't do much.   This week,
it'll be much tougher against the swarming Steeler defense ranked # 1 in
Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks.   They rank # 3 in
Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.   I'm not one for benching your best players
but this is one matchup you'll want to look at very closely.

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

That'll do it for the Rushing Matchups.   Passing Matchups to follow.

Joe

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Bryant Analytics, Inc.   All Rights Reserved 1999-2001

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cheatsheets-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Terry K. - Oncall

Date:		3/4/2001
Time:		7:00 AM - 8:00 AM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Perfect. Sounds like you had a good conversation. Thanks, AG

"Dasovich, Jeff" wrote:

> Talked to Pescetti yesterday.  Prior to returning my call, he had
> received the information that Joe Kelliher had already been appointed to
> the open Republican spot, and therefore understands that there's no
> longer a Republican seat to run for. We had a good talk. I told him that
> reinstating DA was the most important energy issue facing California.
>
> Best,
> Jeff
>
> **********************************************************************
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
> **********************************************************************


[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
 PLEASE  VISIT OUR SPONSORS:
3'x5' Outdoor Flag $9.95. SAVE $25.00! When you buy a flag,we will donate 10% of total Flag Sales to the American Red Cross designated to the relief efforts in New York. CLICK HERE.

  Dear Jane Tholt,   NFL ODDS  Saturday  FAVORITE           OPEN     TODAY   O/U         UNDERDOG  at New England       3        3     (37)        Miami at San Francisco     3        3     (40 1/2 )   Philadelphia at Oakland           6 1/2    5     (46)        Tennessee  Sunday  at Tampa Bay         3        3     (38)        New Orleans St. Louis           12 1/2   12     (47)        at Carolina at Kansas City       3        3     (40 1/2 )   San Diego at N.Y. Giants       4        3 1/2 (35)        Seattle at Atlanta           4        4     (40 1/2 )   Buffalo Chicago              2 1/2    2     (33)        at Washington at Baltimore        10       11     (33 1/2 )   Cincinnati at Green Bay         8 1/2    8     (38)        Cleveland at Pittsburgh        9       10     (36 1/2 )   Detroit at Arizona           3 1/2    3 1/2 (37 1/2 )   Dallas at Minnesota         3 1/2  OFF     (OFF)       Jacksonville at Indianapolis      2        1     (47)        N.Y. Jets

  ---COOL  NEW REMINDERS---Great Quotes of the DayTravel DigestPet Tips ---FAVORITE  REMINDERS---Entertainment NewsChildren's Product RecallsU.S. Market Indicies  Get helpful ideas and insights from other small business owners and entrepreneurs. Sign up for Advice for Small Business. CLICK HERE.

To  unsubscribe from this Reminder topic, click  here.
To unsubscribe  from SmartReminders altogether, click  here.
[IMAGE]


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/05/2001
05:26 PM ---------------------------

Anita DuPont@ENRON
01/04/2001 04:43 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya
Tamarchenko/HOU/ECT@ECT, Zimin Lu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martin Lin/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Maureen Raymond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Osman Sezgen/HOU/EES@EES, Paulo
Issler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amitava Dhar/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Alex
Huang/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Kindall/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin G
Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clayton Vernon/Corp/Enron@ENRON, William
Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jose Marquez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Chonawee
Supatgiat/Corp/Enron@Enron, Shalesh Ganjoo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elena
Chilkina/Corp/Enron@Enron, Gwyn Koepke/NA/Enron@Enron, Hector
Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, V Charles Weldon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Praveen
Mellacheruvu/HOU/EES@EES, Li Sun/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephen
Bennett/NA/Enron@ENRON, Roman Zadorozhny/HOU/EES@EES, Lance
Cunningham/NA/Enron@ENRON, Leann Walton/NA/Enron@ENRON, Shane
Green/HOU/EES@EES, Seksan Kiatsupaibul/HOU/EES@EES, Nelson
Neale/NA/Enron@Enron, Kenneth Parkhill/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jason
Sokolov/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Bigalow/NA/Enron@Enron, Rakesh
Bharati/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Research Group Party on January 6, 2001

Please let me know by 2:00 PM tomorrow whether you are coming to the Research
Group Party on Saturday.  Also,if you are attending,  what food item will you
bring and how many adults and children will be attending.  I need to know
final numbers so I can buy the paper goods, drinks, etc. that are being
furnished for the party.

---------------------- Forwarded by Anita DuPont/NA/Enron on 01/04/2001 04:26
PM ---------------------------

Anita DuPont
01/02/2001 03:15 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pinnamaneni
Krishnarao/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vasant Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike A
Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph Hrgovcic/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya
Tamarchenko/HOU/ECT@ECT, Zimin Lu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martin Lin/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Maureen Raymond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Osman Sezgen/HOU/EES@EES, Paulo
Issler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amitava Dhar/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Alex
Huang/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Kindall/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin G
Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clayton Vernon/Corp/Enron@ENRON, William
Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jose Marquez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Chonawee
Supatgiat/Corp/Enron@Enron, Shalesh Ganjoo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Halliburton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Elena Chilkina/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sevil
Yaman/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sofya Tamarchenko/NA/Enron@Enron, Bob
Lee/NA/Enron@Enron, Gwyn Koepke/NA/Enron@Enron, Hector Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, V Charles Weldon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Yana
Kristal/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Praveen Mellacheruvu/HOU/EES@EES, Li
Sun/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephen Bennett/NA/Enron@ENRON, Roman
Zadorozhny/HOU/EES@EES, Lance Cunningham/NA/Enron@ENRON, Leann
Walton/NA/Enron@ENRON, Shane Green/HOU/EES@EES, Seksan
Kiatsupaibul/HOU/EES@EES, Kate Lucas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nelson
Neale/NA/Enron@Enron, Rabi De/NA/Enron@ENRON, Kenneth
Parkhill/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jaesoo Lew/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jason
Sokolov/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Bigalow/NA/Enron@Enron, Rakesh
Bharati/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom Barkley/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Research Group Party on January 6, 2001

Hope you can join us.

Regards,
Anita


Please remove my name from you distribution.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


T&J:

I think at this point, any more changes, and we're going to blow our
collective brains out.  But here's a question.  What interest rate did we use
to calculate the interest the County receives on its "ending balance?"  Ted,
you likely have a much better feel for this, but should it be something like
the 3-month commercial paper rate, or something?  Did we use the 20-year
treasury?  Again, I think we likely ought leave the thing along at this
point, but thought I'd throw it out there.  Tell me that it doesn't matter,
please.

And Ted, I thought we agreed that the interest rate was 5.720928373983039
(kidding).

Jackie:  Good luck with Schwab.  I'll keep my fingers and toes crossed.

Best,
Jeff


Good Afternoon!

Please send me the results of your phone interviews.

I need to begin to contact these candidates to arrange their transportation to Houston.

Please e-mail a yes or no for your candidates.

John Arnold - Michael Scarlata/Donald Timpanaro/Jeffrey Zaun
John Forney/Frank Ermis - Brandon Cochran/Ruben Lorenzo/Nicholas Watson
Dana Davis - Carl Zavaretti/Sam Zhou/Yvan Go
Doug Gilbert-Smith - Augustin Leon/Brian McNamara/Zoya Raynes

Thank you!!!

Adrianne
x57302


Mark Symms ext33105

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sturm, Fletcher J.
Sent:	Thursday, January 24, 2002 8:33 AM
To:	Will, Lloyd; Imai, Rika
Subject:	Trader's system update

Lloyd/Rika,

Kevin has asked me to be the commercial lead on continuing and expediting the development of the system for the traders that provided real-time pricing, curve shift, positions, etc. that was in the works last year.  Could you please provide me with the names of the IT people I need to contact and/or the lead on the project?  Thanks,

Fletch


James,
Would you take a look at this and let us know what you think.

Thanks,
Kim

-----Original Message-----
From: Proffitt, Robert [mailto:Robert_Proffitt@kindermorgan.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 2:03 PM
To: Matney, David; McConnell, Mark
Cc: Watson, Kimberly
Subject: Transpecos

Dave,
	Using the numbers we have today and the Pemex volume of 240/day @
$0.25 as we have noted does not get KM to where we would want to be.  I
layered on an additional 5 year commitment on the 240/day to cover some of
the gap but we were still short of targets.  I then modified the debt term
to 20 years which should be acceptable as the project would be supported for
that length by the extended term and that covers an additional portion of
the gap.

	However, we are still short of our target and my calculations
indicate a need to have 22/day @ $0.25 starting in year 3 and lasting
through year 20 to make up the difference.  In the alternative, a rate of
$0.267 with the 20 year term and 20 year debt note also gets us there.  All
in all, neither one is that big of a hill to climb so we know what we are
looking at.

Mark,
	Could you review from TW's perspective and see if you come up with
numbers in the same ball park?

Robert Proffitt
Business Development
Natural Gas Pipeline Co
Phone:  713-369-8856
Fax:  713-369-9365


We need to prepare the Proof of Claim in the Perry Gas Companies, Inc.
bankruptcy.     The debtor's  Schedule F filed  29-Sep-2000, with balances as
of the bankruptcy filing date of 28-Aug-2000,  indicated the amount of our
claims:

Creditor
       Amount
Clinton Energy Management Services               $   702,150.00
Enron Energy Services                                            $5,387,076.11
Enron North America
$1,948,233.60

I need by the close of business Friday, December 17th:

1. Please have the amounts verified by your respective area (ENA/EES).
The accuracy of these figures is quite important.
2. Copies of all the legal documentation for your transaction(s).  We will
need to file this with the court as an attachment

Please call if you have any questions.

Michael Tribolet
x33820
EB2855.


Julie/Vince
?
I worked on both the last couple of nights and made quite  a few small
"improvements".
?
Vince - if the 2nd article (EPRM_02_mr.doc) is OK with you  then that is
ready.
?
The 3rd article needs fig 1 updating still will hopefully  do that this w/e.
?
Les.
?
 - eprm_02_03.ZIP


For your information, the organizational change below will not bring about a
change in administrative coverage for West Power Trading.  Anna Mehrer will
continue to support Greg Wolfe as part of the Middle Market and Services
group.  Kathy Sheppard will continue to support Bill Williams III and Real
Time.

Let me know if you have any questions.

---------------------- Forwarded by Debra Davidson/PDX/ECT on 12/21/2000
08:41 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Tim Belden                           12/20/2000 04:15 PM

To: Portland West Desk
cc:
Subject: Organizational Update

As everyone is surely aware after last night's going away party, John Forney
is heading back to Houston to trade the Short Term Entergy market.  Bill
Williams III will be assuming responsibility for the Real Time desk and will
report to Greg Wolfe.  There are three major areas of responsibility that
Greg and Bill will be focussing on in 2001.  The first is the management of
EPMI's physical power flows.  This entails checking out with counterparties,
handling cuts, and ensuring that all of our risk and settlement systems
reflect the proper information.  The second area is trading done by the Real
Time group.  Each day, our Real Time desk combs the market looking for
attractive trading opportunities.  The third area is the Services Desk.  The
Services Desk provides scheduling and settlements services to customers who
don't have the staff or systems to do it themselves.  We have seen our
Services business grow dramatically this year.

Greg Wolfe will be ultimately responsible for the efforts of the Real Time
desk and our Services business.  Les Rawson will continue in his role on the
Services desk and will report to Greg.  Bill Williams will be responsible for
the day to day operations of the Real Time desk.  Greg will continue to work
closely with the middle market group and will maintain some of his coverage
responsibilities.  Chris Foster will continue to manage the Middle Market
group.


Your list looks good!

	Enron Messaging Administration@ENRON
	Sent by: Erika Vaughan@ENRON
	06/21/2000 10:34 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Company Wide Email

Tana,

These are the groups that we have available for the cities that you mentioned:

 All Enron Houston
 Everyone_in_ECT_Calgary
 Everyone_in_ECT_London
 Everyone_in_ECT_Portland
 Everyone_in_ECT_New York
 Everyone_in_ECT_Denver
 Everyone_in_ECT_Oslo
 Everyone_in_ECT_Singapore
 Singapore EI Announcements
 EI-Australia
 Buenos Aires Argentina - Office Staff
 Buenos Aires Argentina - TGS Office Staff
 Enron Everyone_EOG_Denver
 Enron Everyone_EOG_Calgary

If this will do, let me know and I'll use these groups.  If you need
something else , please contact Linda Lannom in HR to provide you with a list
of all Enron employees by city.  Again, if you do this I will need them in an
Excel spreadsheet with First Name, Last name, Social Security number and
department.

I will send you a draft of the letter in a few minutes.  I will need you to
send approval to Enron Messaging Administration in order to send it out.

Thanks

Erika

From: Tana Jones@ECT on 06/20/2000 06:06 PM
To: Enron Messaging Administration@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Company Wide Email

Please direct this email to all employees at the offices indicated below (I
think Sydney is our Australia office).  I have revised the letter a little
and am reattaching  it.  Thanks!

	Enron Messaging Administration@ENRON
	Sent by: Erika Vaughan@ENRON
	06/19/2000 02:58 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Company Wide Email

It is the "and any other offices where we might have trading affiliates"
portion of your message that still has me concerned.  I can send the message
to all ENA and, if we don't have one already, have HR provide a list of
employees in the other cities you listed.  However, I don't know the answer
to the any other offices.  Do you want to send it to every employee
worldwide?

Sorry to be difficult but I still don't have a good idea of your desired
audience.

Erika

From: Tana Jones@ECT on 06/19/2000 02:44 PM
To: Enron Messaging Administration@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Company Wide Email

I do not have an individual list.  It will have to got to all the employees
in the cities, and or countries where we have trading offices, which is
pretty much the list I had below.

	Enron Messaging Administration@ENRON
	Sent by: Erika Vaughan@ENRON
	06/19/2000 02:24 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Company Wide Email

Tana,

We have a recent group with all of ENA.  However, we do not have anything set
up for trading affiliate offices or a way to determine that information.
Please provide any names/addresses that are needed other than the ENA.

If you do give me names that are not already in a Notes address format, I
will need you to provide them in an Excel spreadsheet with First Name, Last
name, Social Security number and department to help resolve conflicts.

Please contact me if you have any questions.

Erika

From: Tana Jones@ECT on 06/19/2000 01:42 PM
To: Enron Messaging Administration/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Company Wide Email

I need to send out the attached memo ASAP to all employees of Enron North
America and its trading affiliate offices.  This includes Houston, Calgary,
London, Denver, New York, Oslo, Singapore, Portland, Australia, Buenos Aires,
and any other offices where we might have trading affiliates.  Can someone
with your team get back to me ASAP so we can be clear about who we send this
to.  Thanks!


Warren Page
131 Ord Street
San Francisco, CA 94114
wpage@speakeasy.net

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Warren Page


Well, how does it feel to be back?  I'm sure, even though our fair city can't
compete with London for history and culture, there are a few things you've
missed about this place.  Hope the flight back was good and I'm sure I'll be
seeing you around.

Susan


I wanted to advise you that Ken has joined another board - nCUBE, Corp.
nCUBE is in the video on-demand business.  Blockbuster and Enron have entered
into an agreement with nCUBE that it will provide video streaming media
appliances, software applications, technology consulting and design for the
on-demand service.

Rosie


I would love for you to meet our new VP of Professional Services (who is,
incidentally, now for all intents and purposes running our company).  I
think you will love him.  He is very interested in the idea of working with
Enron and I want you to meet him.  Can we set up a dinner for the three of
us sometime in the next couple weeks?  I know your schedule is busy with
school, so why don,t you tell me a couple nights that work (other than
Mondays) and I will make it work on our end.  Please oh please.

Love,

Your Pal Cameron

P.S.  Going to Colleen,s new (to me) place for some wine tonight.  I,ll tell
her hello for you(

Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
cameron@perfect.com
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)


======================================================================

GLOBAL GREEN USA - EVENTS UPDATE

======================================================================

January 2002 - http://www.globalgreen.org/

======================================================================

UPCOMING EVENTS:

EARTH DIALOGUES - LYON, FRANCE - Feb 21 to 23

6TH ANNUAL GREEN CROSS MILLENNIUM AWARDS - LOS ANGELES, CA - MARCH 15

5TH ANNUAL SUSTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM - LOS ANGELES, CA - MARCH 15

======================================================================

EARTH DIALOGUES - LYON, FRANCE - Feb 21 to 23

The Earth Dialogues were launched by Mikhail Gorbachev and Maurice Strong to
provide a forum for constructive debate on the most pressing issues related
to global sustainability. Representatives of civil society, government,
international organizations, finance, business, religion, media and
academia, along with members of the public, will convene to exchange their
views on how to reinvigorate the ethics debate within the sustainable
development and globalization agendas and propose concrete actions to
address environmental degradation and poverty.

The 2002 Earth Dialogues will examine key issues related to the ethical
challenges of global responsibility, rights and social justice as related to
sustainable development, and propose concrete measures to ensure that the
benefits of globalization are more equitably shared throughout the world.
The conference will address the following questions:

1.    What are the factors that have impeded the implementation of existing
codes of environmental conduct and practice?

2.    Why are the tools already available to overcome these barriers to
sustainability not fully used or implemented?

3.    What role could universally agreed ethical standards for sustainable
development serve in eradicating poverty and spreading the benefits of
globalization
more equitably?

4.    What should be done to encourage the value and behavioral changes
needed for the implementation of environmental, economic and social best
practices?

5.    How can the Earth Charter contribute to framing a new ethic of global
responsibility?

Up to 1000 people are expected to attend the meetings, which will also be
widely broadcast and available on the Internet. In addition to the panel and
plenary debates, The Earth Dialogues program includes: An Earth Fair with
eco-efficiency displays from industry; Earth Art Exhibition, including the
work of children from around the world; Press Conferences; and an Earth
Music Concert, with top artists playing to tens of thousands of people.

For more information, log on to http://www.earthdialogues.org/

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Green Cross International and Global Green USA present

The Sixth Annual Green Cross Millennium Awards
With Special Guest
Mikhail S. Gorbachev -
President, Green Cross International

Since 1996, the Green Cross Millennium Awards have celebrated the
environmental leadership of extraordinary individuals and organizations who,
through their commitment to the Earth, recognize the interconnection between
humankind and nature and show us the way to a sustainable future.

2001-2002 Honorees:
California State Treasurer Philip Angelides * Betty and Homero Aridjis (Founders, Grupo de los Cien) * Woody Harrelson * Carly Fiorina (Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Hewlett-Packard Company) * Jonathan Lash (President, World Resources Institute)

Friday March 15, 2002

Reception and Silent Eco-Auction 6:00 pm *
Organic Dinner and Program 7:00 pm

The Ritz-Carlton Marina Del Rey * 4375 Admiralty Way

Dinner Chairs:
Eloise and John Paul DeJoria, Pat Mitchell and Scott Seydel, Ann and Jerry
Moss, Diane Meyer Simon

Co-Chairs:
Sebastian Copeland, Diane Sillan Isaacs and Greg Isaacs , Leila and Matt
Conners Petersen, Cynthia and Tim Sexton

RSVP required - For more information, please contact Laura Grunberger at 310.394.7700 x111 (lgrunberger@globalgreen.org) or log
on to http://www.globalgreen.org/news/events2.cfm?id=4&bgt=33e3r9jfkdl

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Global Green's Fifth Annual Sustainability Symposium:

CONFRONTING CLIMATE CHANGE: Averting a Global Environmental Crisis

A panel discussion of business, media, scientific, and environmental leaders

Closing remarks  by Green Cross International President MIKHAIL S. GORBACHEV.

FRIDAY, MARCH, 15, 2002 - 1:00 to 4:00 p.m. (time subject to change)

Marina Beach Marriott - 4100 Admiralty Way - Marina Del Rey, 90292

General Admission.......$25     Students.......$5

Reservations required

For more information or to RSVP, please e-mail ggusa@globalgreen.org

-------------------------------------------------------------------

VOLUNTEER OPPORTUNITIES

Global Green USA is looking for dedicated volunteers to join our team
and work with us on the Millennium Awards and Sustainability Symposium
at our Santa Monica, CA headquarters.

To apply, send a message to lgrunberger@globalgreen.org

-------------------------------------------------------------------

GLOBAL GREEN USA, The US Affiliate of Green Cross International

Global Green USA works in cooperation with individuals, industry, and
government to foster a global value shift toward a sustainable and secure
world.

Acting as a catalyst, facilitator, and mediator, Global Green USA encourages
collaborative approaches and crosscutting solutions to environmental
challenges.

Copyright (c) 2002, Global Green USA - the US affiliate of Green Cross
International

See what's new on our web site: http://www.globalgreen.org/

-------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------
If you would like to change your preferences or unsubscribe at
any time, please go to the following URL:  http://www.globalgreen.org/news/pref.cfm?uid=679935885920014802998714440.


Kathy/Greg/John - Do we need the skills described in the attached resume on
the project team or in the permanent support group or in the eSupply group?
There are no personal recommendations associated this resume.
Vince - thanks for keeping us in mind!
---------------------- Forwarded by Melissa Becker/Corp/Enron on 02/01/2000
01:58 PM ---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski@ECT
01/31/2000 09:04 AM
To: Melissa Becker/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Wayne Tow's Resume

Melissa,

Please, take a look at this resume. Any interest?
I got it from a headhunter (I don't know her,
it was a cold call on her part and she did not make a good impression).

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/31/2000
09:01 AM ---------------------------

leewells@swbell.net on 01/25/2000 05:34:57 PM
Please respond to leewells@swbell.net
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Wayne Tow's Resume

Hi there Mr. Kaminski! It was a pleasure to speak with you today. I look

forward to lunch one day soon at Brennans.

Wayne Tow is a brilliant man, He worked for many years for a man I know
well.  This man says, Wayne is as good as it get, and he could do
anything that is assigned to him, and do it at  a level in which he was
always amazed.
He loves the E-commerce area, and this is what he wants to do
Thank you, Vince.
Lee Wells

 - Wayne2.doc


Hi there,

Could someone email me the latest version of the AIP?

Thanks,

Kay


THIS TEMPLATE IS STORED IN THE M:ELECTRIC\24 HOUR\CIN INDEX\IPG EMAIL
REPORTS\2001\FEB 01\ REVISED TEMPLATE 2-20-01.

"Ellen Clardy" <ellen.clardy@ipgdirect.com> on 02/20/2001 12:06:56 PM
Please respond to <ellen.clardy@ipgdirect.com>
To: <Dean.Laurent@enron.com>, <Mitch.Robinson@enron.com>,
<Doug.Miller@enron.com>, <Miguel.Garcia@enron.com>, <Larry.Jester@enron.com>,
"Christopher Watts" <Christopher.Watts@enron.com>, "Don Baughman"
<don.baughman@enron.com>, "John Kinser" <John.Kinser@enron.com>, "Kayne
Coulter" <Kayne.Coulter@enron.com>
cc: "Suzanna Strangmeier" <Suzanna.Strangmeier@ipgdirect.com>, "Bobette
Riner" <bobette.riner@ipgdirect.com>

Subject: Updated template

We have begun beta testing our 3 new indexes: TVA, ComEd, and ERCOT. If you
could please share the attached template with everyone on the hourly desk at
night, we would really appreciate it! It is very similar to the one before,
but it includes the new indexes. As always, any indicative prices are very
welcomed!

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us. Thank you so much for
your time.

Ellen Clardy, Ph.D.
Power Market Analyst
TradersNews
713/647-6603
ellen.clardy@ipgdirect.com

 - 6ndxtemplate.xls


I have received the list of CES agreements which George put together as
having Texas delivery points and have been attempting to put together a back
to back agreement similar to the back to back agreement which ENA has with
CES; however, I keep running into confidentially agreement problems.  I
understand that these CES agreements relate to June business and have no
deals and/or term beyond that point.  I suggest that the deliveries under
these agreements be documented as a GTC Confirmation between ENA and HPL and
thus avoid the confidentiality agreement problems.  George Weissman and Bob
Hall feel that this is a workable solution.  We will proceed with the
preparation of GTC's for each deal unless I hear otherwise.


For your pleasure
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 10/18/2000
01:45 PM ---------------------------

"Louis Riley" <louisriley@houston.rr.com> on 10/18/2000 01:43:23 PM
To: <jeff.shankman@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Louis Riley Resume to Jeff Shankman

Dear Mr. Shankman,
?
Thank you for your time today.?
?
I faxed you my resume as you suggested.
?
Here is an electronic copy as well.
?
Sincerely,
?
?
Louis Riley
 - Louis Riley Cover Letter and Resume to Mr. Jeffrey Shankman 10.18.00.doc


ok to pay
-----Original Message-----
From: enron_update@concureworkplace.com
[mailto:enron_update@concureworkplace.com]
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 10:45 AM
To: David Delainey
Subject: <<Concur Expense Document>> - Kay Chapman expenses 12/3/01

The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: Charlotte K. Chapman
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: Kay Chapman expenses 12/3/01
Report Total: $134.46
Amount Due Employee: $134.46

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://expensexms.enron.com


What's the scoop on this?
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 10/03/2000 09:24 AM -----

	Camille Gerard@ENRON
	10/03/2000 09:23 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: TransAmerica

Tana, I have a second user applying for this company.  I show them as not
open for trade - is this still correct? Not really urgent...
Thanks,
Camille


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 03/19/2001 07:50 AM -----

	Christie Patrick@ECT
	03/15/2001 10:02 AM

		 To: Alice Weekley/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Jordan
Hunter/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Stephen Veatch/Enron@EnronXGate, Frank S
Wang/Corp/Enron@Enron, ricardo_n_calvo@urscorp, roger_w_gunther@ursc
		 cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Danny McCarty/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Mike
McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelly Kimberly/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Lauren Iannarone/NY/ECT@ECT, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Calypso Tribal Letters

Friends,

The statute should be reviewed by whichever lawyer is supporting the project.

 As I mentioned to Alice Weekley, I am unfamiliar with the recent amendments
referenced requiring the notice for projects that do not actually cross
reservation property. The amendment does not surprise me though.

 In the past, for example, during the Transwestern expansion in '91, we
developed a comprehensive NAGPRA plan with tribes whose reservations we
crossed, yet neighboring tribes were included--the thinking by the various
State Historic Preservation officers was that unearthed remains (bones,
funerial objects, pottery pieces, holy objects, etc) may have belonged to
tribes other than those from whose reservation they were ultimately
unearthed.  It made for a VERY VERY long and complicated plan and
consultation process....not only when objects were unearthed, but simply
putting the required anticipatory plan and procedures in place PRIOR to
construction.  (It gives me a chuckle: my late husband, Leonard Hilton, who
was in charge of the TW project, is likely rolling in his own grave at the
mere thought of Enron having to put another of these plans
together..Haha!!)   As I said, I've not read the amendment , but hopefully it
only legally requires 'notice'---yet, in my nearly 20 years of practicing
law, I've rarely seen  a 'notice' that didn't crack the door or sound the
alarm of further buerocratic opportunity!

For your further information, I have met Billie Ray Cypress personally and
he's a decent and seemingly reasonable guy with a huge casino on the rez ;
yet these personal attributes frequently go by the wayside when it comes to
'perceived economic opportunity'.
 Chief James Billie,[chief of the Seminoles, 2nd largest/2nd wealthiest tribe
in North America] on the other hand, is shrewd in business, dictitorial in
management, and personally , has an ego bigger than Texas, behavior to match,
and is proud of it!! --which makes him a ton of fun to be with if he likes
you--he wrestles alligators, writes rock and roll and "plays"in whatever
stage opportunity is presented him--as long as he can be the center of
attention.  The Seminoles have not only a tribal web site, James Billie has
his own!!  Check it out--it's a hoot!!  He has been chief for about 25 years
(and I'm guessing he's maybe in his early 50's).  The Seminoles have
recognized significant economic development under James, but he is definitely
a "My way or the highway" kind of guy--he loves you, hates you, or ignores
you--and he has a tribal council that is respectfully terrified of him. If
any activity smacks of anything James Billie doesn't like, he'll know no
limits in stopping it...remember, this guy wrestles alligators!! No Joke!

I don't recognize the other names on the list, but I think it's clear from
both the beurocratic issues, as well as the specific tribal issues incident
to each affected tribe, everything associated with the process should be
executed with all of this in mind.  I'd be happy to speak with the project's
lawyer to discuss this further, if information beyond that set forth above
would be helpful.

Thanks!

--Christie.

----- Forwarded by Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT on 03/15/2001 08:53 AM -----

	roger_w_gunther@urscorp.com
	03/15/2001 08:32 AM

		 To: alice.weekley@enron.com
		 cc: jordan.hunter@enron.com, stephen.veatch@enron.com,
frank_s_wang@enron.com, christie.patrick@enron.com,
ricardo_n_calvo@urscorp.com
		 Subject: Calypso Tribal Letters

Alice:

Janus Research sent the enclosed letters to me;  I understand that they
have been modified per your discussions with them.  Also enclosed is a
summary document outlining recent revisions to Section 106 (National
Historic Preservation Act).

Regards,

Roger

(See attached file: Section 106 regs (1).doc)(See attached file: Fred
McGhee 3-7-01.doc)(See attached file: James Billie 3-7-01.doc)(See attached
file: Jerry Haney 3-7-01.doc)(See attached file: R. Perry Beaver
2-7-01.doc)(See attached file: Billie Cypress 3-7-01.doc)
 - Section 106 regs (1).doc
 - Fred McGhee 3-7-01.doc
 - James Billie 3-7-01.doc
 - Jerry Haney 3-7-01.doc
 - R. Perry Beaver 2-7-01.doc
 - Billie Cypress 3-7-01.doc