----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 05/25/2001 08:30 AM -----

	Michael Tribolet/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/25/2001 08:27 AM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: PG&E Action before Bankruptcy Court

I would ask Mike Smith.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Sanders, Richard
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 7:45 AM
To: Tribolet, Michael; Frank, Robert; Steffes, James; Sweet, Twanda
Subject: RE: PG&E Action before Bankruptcy Court

I have asked my asst, Twanda Sweet, to set up a meeting on Tues re this
issue. I will include Mike Day. Is there anyone else that should be in this
meeting---EES legal?
----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 05/25/2001 07:41 AM -----

	Michael Tribolet/ENRON@enronXgate 05/24/2001 10:08 AM 	   To: Robert
Frank/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT  cc:   Subject: RE: PG&E
Action before Bankruptcy Court

PG&E want to fight the TURN accounting as it, basically, wiped out hopes of
collecting their undercollected amount from a regulatory accounting
perspective.   The company has said they need to keep the old accounting
convention alive, as it would bolster their chance for recovery in the
litigation on the just and reasonable argument in Federal District Court.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Frank, Robert
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 9:50 AM
To: Tribolet, Michael; Sanders, Richard
Subject: PG&E Action before Bankruptcy Court

Can either of you help me get Jim an answer?
---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Frank/NA/Enron on 05/24/2001 09:49
AM ---------------------------

 << OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >>
James D Steffes
05/24/2001 09:20 AM
To: Robert Frank/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: PG&E Action before Bankruptcy Court

Bob --

Monday, May 14 PG&E asked the Court to stay the PUC's March 27 Order on
accounting procedures.  Where is this going?  This would be very bad.

Jim


---------------------- Forwarded by Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron on 05/02/2001
09:54 AM ---------------------------
From: Bradley Jones/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/02/2001 01:05 AM
To: Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: orig

Errol,
I noticed a small mistake late last night.  Their is West orig on your Orig
schedule that is not 0.  It is already on the west schedule so the value just
needs to be taken off your orig schedule tab.

The cells that need to be set = to 0 are p41 and q41

thanks,
brad


Document		Signature
Act of Sale Form  	Jean Mrha/Julie Gomez

Board Resolution	Mark Haedicke
			Louise Kitchen

Corporate Guaranty	Jeff McMahon/Ray Bowen (DONE for $3 MM)

Certificate of Non-Foreign Status Stephen Douglas (DONE)

DASH 			Rick Buy/Dave Gorte
			Jean Mrha/Julie Gomez
			Mark Haedicke
			John Lavorato/Louise Kitchen
			Jeff McMahon/Ray Bowen

This DASH definitely needs a Legal Risk memo, which I have attached as a separate document.  Along with the DASH, it needs to be updated for the actual sale price (and the date was wrong--I fixed that on the attached but be sure Gerald's version has the right date) and then added on to the body of the DASH before signatures.  Gorte has already looked at this one, so we should be okay to get going on the signatures right away, though I would still start with him, just in case.

There must be a computer glitch (!!!), because I am not able to open the Act of Sale and Board Resolution documents that Gerald forwarded.  He will, of course, provide executable copies of those documents anyway (same goes for the TB documents), but I will forward you his email and hopefully you will have better luck opening them than I did. The DASH anf the Lega Risk Memo are attached below, and I will leave copies of the Certificate of Non-Foreign Status on your desk.


Mike,

Per our conversation today, please note the assignment of transformers to the
PSCO / Fountain Valley Station project in El Paso county Colorado.

Unit / ABB Item # Guaranteed Delivery Date Site Designation

LNL 9517-1   11/17/00  El Paso County, Colorado

LNL 9517-2   11/17/00  El Paso County, Colorado

LNL 9517-3   12/01/00  El Paso County, Colorado

Please feel free to call if you have any questions or concerns.

Chris


SIVY ON STOCKS from money.com
May 16, 2001

*****************[ A D V E R T I S E M E N T ]****************
Jump-start a child's College Fund with MONEY's $5000 QUICK CASH
Sweepstakes! It's easy - just click the link below for your
chance to enter to win $5000 Cash! Plus while you're at money.com,
jumpstart your investments with a FREE Trial issue of MONEY!
Click Here: http://www.money.com/scholarship
**************************************************************

Face-off on McDonald's

Is the world's number-one fast-food chain really poised for a comeback --
or is the stock depressed for good reason.

By Michael Sivy

MONEY editor-at-large Ken Kurson and Michael Sivy go head-to-head over this
column's recommendation of McDonald's (see Supersize this Stock!
[ http://www.money.com/money/depts/investing/sivy/archive/010514.html ]).
On Monday, Sivy argued that the stock is a good buy even though it appears
beset with problems -- the economic slowdown in the U.S.; fears about
mad-cow disease and hoof-and-mouth disease that have depressed beef
consumption in Europe; and the chronically weak euro, which reduces the
value of McDonald's European profits. Sivy believes that these problems
will soon pass, profit growth will pick up again, and the stock's valuation
-- well below historical levels -- will climb back toward normal. Kurson
doesn't buy it. Their debate follows:

Kurson
This time you've gone too far! How can you possibly like anything about
McDonald's -- either the business OR the stock? (I'm assuming you at LEAST
detest the food.) Yes, the valuations are cheap next to its own historical
averages, but NOT against competitors. The PEG ratio is by far highest in
the group: McDonald's PEG is 1.39 versus 1.01 for Brinker [EAT], 0.99 for
CBRL Group [CBRL], 1.06 for Darden [DRI] and a lowly 0.95 for Tricon [YUM]
(despite those endless delicious stuffed crust innovations at Pizza Hut).
And McDonald's price/sales ratio is more than TWICE any of its competitors.

And for what? A proven ability in the PAST to build faster and a net profit
margin that's the envy of the sector. But as your column points out,
overseas is where the opportunity is and also where the problems are. You
say the problems will pass, but I totally disagree. Mad-cow disease and
hoof-and-mouth disease MAY be temporary, faddish, fashionable concerns. I
happen to think they're not so easily dismissed, but even conceding that
point, it doesn't get at the root of MCD's failure to replicate overseas
the disgusting (and disgustingly profitable) empire it has erected here.
Evidence? Japan, where MCD is planning a piddling 220 new stores in 2001
(versus 360 in 2000). That's the company's second biggest market (bigger
than Europe) and there are concerns about profit margins there, as well.

You rightly point out the company relied too heavily on promotional
gimmicks. But then you give MCD points for totally ridiculous stuff like
high-end coffee at their McCafes. Yeah, right. I'm sure Starbucks is
quaking in its boots. Just like Pizza Hut was terrified by McPizza.

Sivy
The short response to the points you raise is that I don't really believe
in securities analysis.

Here's the longer version: I don't believe that projections of a company's
business trends are more reliable than the stock's actual track record and
natural statistical tendencies, such as regression to the mean. If analysts
couldn't anticipate the effect of telecom infrastructure overbuilding on
Cisco's business, they can't anticipate anything.

Fact is, McDonald's has proved remarkably resilient over time, despite its
mediocre products. The same arguments you make now have been made before.
And yet McDonald's has retained its dominant position relative to Tricon
and Wendy's and other smaller chains.

When globalization was a hot concept right after the Berlin Wall fell,
companies with global franchises enjoyed excellent growth. Now "globaloney"
is out of fashion and no one is willing to pay up for such franchises (that
goes for U.S. packaged food companies too).

At the moment, everything is going against McDonald's stock. But most of
the these trends are cyclical, in one way or another. The U.S. economy will
turn. And the McDonald's marketing machine will improve its success rate.
And sooner or later, the stock's multiple will improve. I'm not looking for
the next Dell Computer, but I do think that from this price the return on
McDonald's will beat a 12 percent hurdle rate.

As to the current backlash against beef, I regard it as a temporary -- and
rather ridiculous -- expression of deviant psychology. Basically, the same
sorts of people who supported North Vietnam in the '60s have redirected
their self-hatred from the national to the personal level. This leads to
body-piercing, food phobias, and incompetent riots at international
free-trade meetings. This too shall pass -- or at least be redirected again
to rescuing mink, or something.

Kurson
I, too, place no faith in securities *analysts*, and thus share your
suspicion about growth-rate projections. But I certainly believe in
securities *analysis*, and you do, too, because that's what it is to
recommend MCD based upon its history, the cyclical nature of the economy,
the foolhardiness of those who oppose beef. These all fit comfortably under
the heading of traditional analysis, and I don't see any percentage in
throwing out all the tools just because a couple of them display the greasy
fingerprints of sell-side analysts.

As for your point about past record being more compelling, yeah, I give a
company credit for a track record. But only when there's a forward-looking
justification for why that success (and higher valuation) will continue. I
mean, if a stock costs more than the stock of its peers because the company
is doing things differently and is hard to imitate, I'm willing to afford
it some juice. But if a stock costs more simply because it always has, I'm
skeptical. Especially when things have changed to make previous advantages
less impressive -- as I believe has happened to McDonald's. That's why I
cited the sharp fall-off of store openings in Japan.

Any drop in beef consumption may very well be temporary: There's clearly no
limit to how fat Americans are willing to become and like a lot of trends,
we're way out in front and I expect the rest of the world to follow suit in
time. However, I DON'T think McDonald's will continue to show the dominance
in fulfilling that demand, or at least continue to do so way better than
competitors.

Sivy
Where I differ with you is that I have a far greater skepticism toward all
trend projections, even though I acknowledge that we have to use them to
value stocks.

Just as economists have predicted 19 of the past seven recessions,
securities analysts tend to over-predict changes in earnings trends. What
really changes, though, is the level of valuations. A decade ago, everyone
loved companies with global brand names. Now they ignore those stocks. I
tend to think that the fashion has changed far more than the underlying
fundamentals. Statistically, it's most successful to bet on companies with
strong track records when they're off their game and valuations are low --
that's true even if you can't predict where their next success will come from.

###

Post your comments on Michael's column at:
http://www.money.com/depts/investing/sivy/index.html

To subscribe or unsubscribe to Sivy on Stocks, go to:
http://www.money.com/email/

-----------------------------------------------------------
CONTACT THE BIGGEST COMPANIES IN THE WORLD!
Over 5,000 contact names in the OFFICIAL FORTUNE Databases.
DOWNLOAD THEM NOW!
http://www.fortune.com/sitelets/datastore/index.html?mn01
-----------------------------------------------------------

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Special Internet Offer!!!

Sign up for a RISK-FREE issue of MONEY MAGAZINE at
http://www.money.com/subscribe2

Or if you prefer call our toll-free number 1-800-544-4594

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

We may, from time to time, contact you with offers for Time Inc.
products and services which we think may be of interest to you.
If you would prefer us not to contact you in this manner, AND
YOU DID NOT INDICATE THIS PREFERENCE AT THE TIME YOU SIGNED UP
for the Sivy on Stocks online newsletter or any other Time Inc.
online newsletters, please let us know by sending us an e-mail
at <no_solicit@money.com>.

Additionally, from time to time we may provide your e-mail
address to carefully chosen companies whose offers we think may
be of interest to you.  If you would prefer us not use your
e-mail address in this manner, AND YOU DID NOT INDICATE
THIS PREFERENCE AT THE TIME YOU SIGNED UP for the Sivy on Stocks online
newsletter or any other Time Inc. online newsletter, please let
us know by e-mailing us at <no_transfer@money.com>.


gngr
713-853-7751
----- Forwarded by Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron on 04/30/2001 08:27 AM -----

	Janel Guerrero
	04/27/2001 05:04 PM

		 To: Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Final Price Caps

Ginger, please send this cleaned-up version of the Reason Institute's paper
on Price Caps to everyone in Govt. Affairs.  Thanks!


By now you've received an invitation to attend Forrester's Executive
Strategy Forum, November 8-10, 2000, at The Westin Copley Place in
Boston, Mass.

This annual Forum showcases Forrester's eBusiness strategy research.
During the two-day event for senior executives, we'll unveil our
cutting-edge research on how companies can transform themselves to win
in the Internet economy.  Get all the details and register online:

http://www.forrester.com/ER/Events/Upcoming/Overview/0,1550,122,FF.html

Confirmed industry speakers include:
*  G. Richard Wagoner Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer,
General Motors
*  Marc Andreessen, Chairman and Co-founder, Loudcloud
*  Louise Kitchen, President and Chief Operating Officer, EnronOnline
*  David Campbell, Ph.D., Smith Richardson Senior Fellow, Center for
Creative Leadership
*  Donald Paul, VP, Technology and Environmental Affairs, Chevron
*  Daniel Leemon, Executive Vice President and Chief Strategy Officer,
The Charles Schwab Corporation
*  Rohan Champion, Chairman and Co-founder, eTime Capital

For more information, please call our Events line at +1 888/34-FORUM
(343-6786) or +1 617/613-5905. Seats at this event are limited, so
register online today:

http://www.forrester.com/ER/Events/Upcoming/Overview/0,1550,122,FF.html

Please forward the following information to colleagues who you think
would benefit from Forrester's research and events.

To subscribe to Forrester's Events update, please send an email to
listserv@list.forrester.com with the following command in the body of
your message: subscribe Forrester-event <First Name> <Last Name>. For
example: subscribe Forrester-event Jane Doe.

If you wish to unsubscribe, simply reply to this email with the word
"remove" in the body.

Forrester Events
events@forrester.com
For more information contact us at:
+1 888/343-6786 or +1 617/613-5905
***************************************************************************


I will be out of the office from 07/27/2000 until 07/31/2000.

If you require immediate assistance please contact my assistant Nadja de
Klerk on 020 7783 7056. Thank you.


I'll keep in touch!

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 08/16/2000 02:45 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Travel

That is so kind of them considering the last minute notice.  It's probably
easier to do them all at one time anyway.  Are you coming into the office on
Friday.  Will you get your tickets before you leave this afternoon.  I guess
you don't need them though.

I went out to lunch and it's so hot outside.  I'm just now cooling off after
about 3 big jugs of water.  Of course it's running right through me.

Let me know if you need me to do anything.

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	08/16/2000 02:19 PM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Travel

I'm flying to somewhere (probably DC) tonight, returning on Friday.  Ozzie is
making the travel arrangements, so you don't need to do anything.  I'll let
you know what else I find out.

Thanks,

Kay


I'm glad that you like them.  Soon, you'll be able to see inside of one!

Well, I've been on campus since about 9 this morning.  I've done a whole lot
already.  I'll tell you all about it tonight.  I've gotta finish up a few
slides!

I miss you....

Love you,
Jenn

Clint.Dean@enron.com wrote:

> I remembered what I was going to tell you last night.  On the way to the
> wedding on Saturday, I passed by your new apartment.  They looked pretty
> nice.
>
> I love you,
> Clint


Folks, for your convenience I am attaching a clean copy of the Blue Dog
Contract. Call me if I can be of further assistance.  This is are first LJM
document.

Cheryl Costa
6.6254


ALLEGHENY ENERGY SUPPLY Scheduling Coordinator ID--

*****New ID is APX5******

-----Original Message-----
From: Cristiana Gallegos [mailto:cgallegos@apx.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 1:59 PM
Subject: Announcement: Allegheny Energy Supply SCID Changing

> NOTICE TO MARKET PARTICIPANTS
> Allegheny Energy Supply is changing their SCID
>
> Effective Trade Date Monday, October 1, 2001 Allegheny Energy Supply
> (currently using APX1) will begin scheduling energy trades and bids under
> the new SCID; APX5.  Their OLD SCID 'APX1' WILL NO LONGER BE VALID.
> All of Allegheny Energy Supply's scheduling transactions will use the new
> SCID beginning with submission of Day Ahead schedules for Trade Date,
> Monday, October 1, 2001.
> Any advance schedules that may have already been submitted using the old
> SCID, 'APX1', must be removed (deleted) and rescheduled using the new
> SCID,
> APX5.
> If you have any questions regarding the scheduling of transactions with
> Allegheny Energy Supply, please contact:
> *	APX5 Scheduling D/A, 408-562-9112
> *	APX5 Scheduling H/A, Real Time desk 408-562-9112
> *	Other Issues / Questions, Erik Lopez 626-281-9475
> *	Allegheny Energy Supply 212-224-8850
>
> Distributed on behalf of Allegheny Energy Supply to facilitate the
> transition to their new SCID.
>
>
> ----
> Devon Walton
> Automated Power Exchange, Inc.
> Manager, Market Operations
> 5201 Great America Parkway Suite 522
> Santa Clara, CA 95054
> Phone: (408)517-2131   Fax: (408)517-2985
> Email: dwalton@apx.com
> Web: www.apx.com
>


If you have a spot for him.  I am also going to send it along to the IT HR
contact.

---------------------- Forwarded by David Baumbach/HOU/ECT on 05/19/2000
02:42 PM ---------------------------

AORR@dynegy.com on 05/19/2000 02:28:26 PM
To: David.Baumbach@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re:

Here is Neal's resume. He will be at the Knoxville address and phone # for the
next couple of weeks. He is going to come down and stay with me around June 1.
My home number is 713-290-8434. Hy home address is 955 W. 42nd Street,
Houston,
77018. My work number is 713-767-8774.

(See attached file: NOrrRes.doc)

 - NOrrRes.doc


Brother Tools,
   As of this date, I, your hard working ticket procurement master, have
only heard from Mannino, Beek, Jordan, Kretz, Wallace, Elvis, Grumbles,
Glass, C-Paul, John Miller, and Space re: ordering tickets to sit with
the
brothers of the pail.  I'm figuring I've got about two more weeks to wait
to
place the order to ensure we all get block seating, so....if you're
wanting
to sit within the Eye of Wooglin section, which, by the way, WILL OWN THE

FRICKING STADIUM THAT DAY, you kinda need to let me know as soon as you
can.
  I'll be sending this message a few more times, so get used to it
dirtballs.
    See you at the game.

Yours in -kai-,
  Drow  boethia@hotmail.com

PS.  Who in the hell bid Ricky Baier?
PSS. Feel free to forward this to any brother not on this list.
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.


Daren,
Did things work out here. Do you still need to talk with me about it.
Ami

---------------------- Forwarded by Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron on 06/06/2000
08:04 AM ---------------------------

"Steve Holmes" <Steve.Holmes@dvn.com> on 06/01/2000 04:15:11 PM
To: <Ami.Chokshi@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Carthage (American Central) Nomination

Chad called and said you guys are requestiing approximately 74,000 MMBtu
effective June 1.  I show the number should be 72,240 MMBtu/d.  Could you
please check into this and let me know what's going on?

Thanks,
Steve


Hi Philippe -

Ken asked me to request that you call the above referenced gentleman.  He was
referred by a friend of Ken's.  He wants to see if his oil on-line business
is a fit for us.  Ken said he has no idea whether it will work or not, but
please give him a courtesy call.

Steve Hellman at 212-628-7191 or cell phone 917-623-9730.

Thanks.

Rosie


Attached below are ORA phase one and phase two draft positions, which they
are working on to get as many parties to embrace. (UC/USC, DGS, manufacturs,
QFs, ESPs,...)
---------------------- Forwarded by Bruno Gaillard/SFO/EES on 03/31/2000
04:37 PM ---------------------------

"Morse, Jay" <jxm@cpuc.ca.gov> on 03/31/2000 03:57:12 PM
To: Anthony Mazy <am1@cpuc.ca.gov>, "Brown [DGS], Andy" <abb@eslawfirm.com>,
"Bruno Gaillard, Enron" <bgaillar@enron.com>, "Davidson, Kieth"
<kdavidson@onsitesycom.com>, "Duggan, Kevin" <kduggan@capstoneturbine.com>,
"Dunlop GRA, Beth" <bdunlop@gralegal.com>, "Finkelstein, Bob"
<bfinkelstein@turn.org>, George Cluff <ill@cpuc.ca.gov>, "Greenberg, Steven"
<sgreen1@ix.netcom.com>, "Gruenich, Dian" <dgrueneich@gralegal.com>, "Lindh,
Karen" <karen@klindh.com>, "Matteson, Gary" <gary.matteson@ucop.edu>, Matthew
Freedman <freedman@turn.org>, "McCrea, Kieth (CMA Counsel)"
<KMcCrea@sablaw.com>, "McLafferty [nextek], Patrick" <nextek3@msn.com>,
"Shames, Mike" <mshames@ucan.org>, "Skowronski, Mark"
<mark.skowronski@alliedsignal.com>, "Teague @DGS, Jonathan"
<jonathan.teague@dgs.ca.gov>, "Thomas, Aaron" <athomas@newenergy.com>,
"Townley, David" <dtownley@newenergy.com>, "Treadway, Nat"
<treadway@alumni.princeton.edu>, Valenzuela PE Tony CSU
<tvalenzuela@calstate.edu>
cc:
Subject: Working Points - DG OIR Phase I and Phase II - for discussion on ly

 <<Erin Brockovichrev3.doc>>

Dear all, here is a proposed quid (separation of ownership of DG from
dispatch) pro quo (discounts, exit fees, standby charges reasonable to DG).?
Not intended to supplant? UC/CSU's excellent 8 points but to put some flesh
on the bones of some of those points. Main idea is that if ORA et al receive
support for separation of ownership from dispatch, we can be supportive of
reasonable rates pertaining to DG.? Please comment.

 - Erin Brockovichrev3.doc


Thanks.  If you'd like to have a conversation that doesn't include the whole
gang on the conference call about the Brattle Group stuff, give me a call and
we can have a calmer, more detailed discussion without all the noise.

Best,
Jeff


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 05/04/2001 09:35 PM -----

	Ana Wu <anwu@Haas.Berkeley.EDU>
	Sent by: owner-evmba_social@Haas.Berkeley.EDU
	05/04/2001 07:44 PM

		 To: mfe02@haas.berkeley.edu, evmba_social@haas.berkeley.edu
		 cc:
		 Subject: Fwd: WIL CONFERENCE KICK OFF MINUTES

Hi all,

We just have our first Women In Leadership Conference 2001 kick off meeting
and we wanted to let you know the outcome and to invite you to participate in
planning this great event!!

The WIL conference will be held on October 20th, 2001, here at Haas

Please reply to anwu@haas.berkeley.edu or bmiller@haas.berkeley.edu if you
have questions or want to be involved

MINUTES ONE

Friday, May 4th, 2001

Thanks for your time (Here are the minutes of the meeting.

PLEASE, DON'T FORGET TO SIGN IN THE WILCON2001 ALIAS IN MAJORDOMO...unless
you received an e-mail from Majordomo today

We will be meeting with the Lead Team next week and the group leaders will
meet with their teams later.

WELCOME to the Lead Team !!!
?       Panel Coordinator  Abby Veeser
?       Marketing  Betty Yee
?       Brochure  Amy Watson
?       Logistics  Jen Nelsen / Michelle Carroll
?       Sponsorship  position available

For those who haven't decided yet which group to join, these are the head
people you can contact or also Bonnie and I if you want some broad idea of
what would be your responsibilities

Theme of the conference
Choice 1: Women in Leadership: Explore, inspire, believe
Choice 2: Women in Leadership: Explore new horizons

Panel topics
We worked on based on the survey Nancy ran last weeks. Here are the topics.
If you have some other ideas and want to participate you can contact Abby
Veeser
1.      Work Life Balance
2.      Career Changes
3.      Wild Women
4.      Inspiration
5.      Mentoring
6.      Speaking / Presentation workshop
7.      New alternative careers: VC, entrepreneurship, biotech (2 panels)
8.      Negotiations
9.      International perspective
10.     Traditional careers: finance, investment banking, etc
11.     Marketing

Keynote choices
We ended with six alternatives to keynotes
        Carly Fiorina  CEO Hewlett Packard
        Meg Whitman  President CEO Ebay
        Shelly Lazarus  Chairman/ CEO
        Donna Dubinsky  CEO Handspring
        Condeleeza Rice  National Security Advisor
        Sheri Lansing  President Paramount
        Toti Graham  GM IBM Peru

Know who is in your team:

Keynote/ sponsorhip team
Julie   Clugage                 Keynote chair
Position available                      Keynote chair
Position available                      Sponsors

Marketing group
Betty   Yee                             Marketing Coordinator
Peggy Chen                              Marketing
Becky Frank                             Website & Sales
Amy     Watson                          Brochure
Emily Stauffer                          Brochure

Logistics group
Jen Nelsen                              Logistics Coordinator
Michelle Carroll                        Logistics Coordinator
Mui Korpaisarn
Kara Cosby

Panel group
Abby    Veeser                          Panel Coordinator
Debra   Underwood                       Panel
Gwyneth Galbraith                       Panel - mentoring
Alex    Galovich                        Panel
Mo      Brown                           Panel - Wild Women
Jihong Sanderson & Sharon Yang  Panel - VC/Entrepreneurship
Irena   Zakrajsek                       Panel
Sarita  Jain                            Panel - HC & Biotech
Tanya   Himathongkam                    Panel - International
Perspectives
Coco    Kee                             Panel
Robyn Shirley-Eldridge                  Panel
Neva    Dogan                           Panel - Career Changes
Dessy Nikolova                  Panel
Zhanara Orazbayeva                      Panel


I'll work with sarah in coming up with the final list

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Shawna Johnson @ ENRON                           01/19/2001 03:57 PM

To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: REVISED PENN ITINERARY!!!!

Hey Jeff,

I don't know--- you tell me?  How many people would you like to attend and
who out of the listed participants would you like to attend?  I will be more
than happy to give those a call who  you feel no longer need to
participate.   When I spoke with Sarah M.  she was trying to get Sarah W. to
come.  Sarah W.  is not confirmed therefore she can easily be removed from
this event.  Let me know what you would like to do.

Shawna

Jeffrey A Shankman@ECT
01/19/2001 03:41 PM
To: Shawna Johnson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Sarah Mulholland/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beth Miertschin/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: REVISED PENN ITINERARY!!!!

Do we really need 7 people to attend this event?

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Shawna Johnson @ ENRON                           01/19/2001 03:38 PM

To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah Mulholland/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gerardo
Benitez/Corp/Enron@Enron, Miguel Nasser/NA/Enron@Enron, Sarah
Wesner/Corp/Enron, Jeffrey Snyder/Corp/Enron, Beth Miertschin/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jennifer Burns/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: REVISED PENN ITINERARY!!!!

Hi!

I apologize for the changes.  Jeff Shankman will now be joining us and he is
added to the event sheet.  You each now have your own confirmation number.
Again, review the event sheet and confirm your hotel dates and contact me
with any changes.  If you should have any questions regarding the itinerary
please do not hesitate to call.

Have fun!

Shawna Johnson
Recruiting Coordinator
58369


We just checked with Corp.  It may be later this evening but probably first thing in the morning.  Will you let Warren know?  Thanks.

Sara

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wesner-Soong, Sarah
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 4:50 PM
To:	Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	FW: Enron Corp. Guaranty

Sara - I just talked to Warren and he asked me to do a status check on this because his New York people are asking him whether he will get this new guaranty tonight or tomorrow.
Sarah
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shackleton, Sara
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 1:09 PM
To:	'"Lauri GOODWYN" <Lauri.GOODWYN@sgfimat.com>@ENRON'
Cc:	Wesner-Soong, Sarah; Panus, Stephanie
Subject:	RE: Enron Corp. Guaranty

Lauri:

Enron Corp. would like to reexecute the guaranty (everything the same but with proper date) so we will deliver a new guaranty and certificate.  We ask that upon receipt, you return the guaranty that you are now holding.

Thanks.

Sara

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Lauri GOODWYN" <Lauri.GOODWYN@sgfimat.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 11:31 AM
To:	Shackleton, Sara
Cc:	Steve FORMAN; Warren Tashnek
Subject:	RE: Enron Corp. Guaranty

ok. we wil make the amendment and send it to you

Sara.Shackleton@enron.com on 11/14/2001 11:09:12 AM

To:   Lauri.GOODWYN@sgfimat.com
cc:

Subject:  RE:  Enron Corp. Guaranty

Lauri:

We are in the midst of obtaining the certificate.

Also, I just noticed that the effective date is missing the year "2001".
Would you like to insert it and we will initial?

Thanks.  Sara

Sara Shackleton
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3801a
Houston, TX  77002
Ph:  (713) 853-5620
Fax: (713) 646-3490

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "Lauri GOODWYN" <Lauri.GOODWYN@sgfimat.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Monday, November 12, 2001 12:21 PM
   To:     Shackleton, Sara; Wesner-Soong, Sarah; Warwick, Todd
   Cc:     Steve FORMAN; Warren Tashnek
   Subject:

   Would it be possible for you to forward a corporate resolution
   indicating
   that the signatory
    on the guaranty has full authorirization? Thanks in advance for your
   help

   ---------------------- Forwarded by Lauri GOODWYN/NYC/FIMAT on
   11/12/2001
   01:23 PM ---------------------------

   Lauri GOODWYN   11/08/2001 10:54 AM
   (Embedded image moved to file: pic24464.pcx)

   To:   Sara.Shackleton@ENRON.com, sarah.wesner@enron.com,
         todd.warwick@enron.com
   cc:

   Subject:

   apparently there has been a technical issue with the e mail i sent. it
   hasnt picked up all of the changes. i am bolding instead of using
   highlighting. the changes should be in para 1(b), 3(c), 4 and 7. i had a
   question in para 6.

   (See attached file: enronguarred.doc)

   Fimat USA Inc., a member of the NASD and SIPC, and a broker dealer and
   futures commission merchant registered under U.S. laws, makes no
   representation or warranty regarding the correctness of any information
   contained herein, or the appropriateness of any transaction for any
   person.  Nothing herein shall be construed as a recommendation to buy or
   sell.  Except as indicated otherwise,  Fimat and the Fimat Group refer
   to all companies or divisions of companies owned directly by Societe
   General that include the "Fimat" name.  Not all products and
   transactions offered by Fimat are available from all companies of the
   Fimat Group.

    - pic24464.pcx << File: pic24464.pcx >>
    - enronguarred.doc << File: enronguarred.doc >>

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************

Fimat USA Inc., a member of the NASD and SIPC, and a broker dealer and futures commission merchant registered under U.S. laws, makes no representation or warranty regarding the correctness of any information contained herein, or the appropriateness of any transaction for any person.  Nothing herein shall be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell.  Except as indicated otherwise,  Fimat and the Fimat Group refer to all companies or divisions of companies owned directly by Societe General that include the "Fimat" name.  Not all products and transactions offered by Fimat are available from all companies of the Fimat Group.


Sounds like it's more than just us!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Stark, Cindy   On Behalf Of Horton, Stanley
Sent:	Friday, March 22, 2002 8:32 AM
To:	Hyatt, Kevin; Lohman, TK; Y'barbo, Paul; Lokay, Michelle; McConnell, Mark; Donoho, Lindy; Dietz, Rick; Nacey, Sheila; Scott, Donna; Bryant, Mike; Blair, Lynn; January, Steve; Holmes, Bradley
Subject:	ORGANIZATION MEETING
Importance:	High

Please rearrange your schedules to attend a meeting with Stan Horton today at 10:45am in 49C3.   Sorry for the short notice.

Cindy Stark
Executive Assistant to Stan Horton
Tel:   713/853-6197
Fax:  713/345-7047
Cindy.Stark@enron.com


The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: Jean  . Adams
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: Great River Energy
Report Total: $515.09
Amount Due Employee: $515.09

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://expensexms.enron.com


Here is a Master draft for Nicor.  I trust you will forward to your
customer?  Let me know if you need anything else for Nicor.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Any processing is handled by Devon.  ENA is buying the residue gas at the
tailgate of the plant.

D

Rita Wynne
11/27/2000 11:39 AM
To: Mary Poorman/NA/Enron@Enron, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: CES - Devon

Mary,

This is all the information that I have when Ami first looked at all the CES
information.  It does not mention a processing agreement, but that does not
mean that there isn't one.

Daren - do you know anything about a processing agreement for the Devon gas
at the Gulf Plains plant as it relates to the CES acquisition?


---------------------- Forwarded by Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT on 01/31/2001
09:55 AM ---------------------------

From:  Stephanie Sever
     01/30/2001 01:12 PM

To: Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: EnronOnline Information Needed

Hunter,

I am conducting Book website audit.  Please provide the trader names for the
following IDs under the ENA- IM Central book and if they should be active:

Users under ADM11515

Market01 - kill
Market02 - kill
andylewis - kill
canada01 - last log in 1/24/01 - kill
canada02 - kill
chuckames - log in 1/30/01 Chuck Ames (keep)
gulfcoast1 - kill
gulfcoast2 - kill
jason001- log in 1/30/01 Jason Williams (keep)
lisakinsey - kill
lizshim01 - last log in 1/8/01 - kill
massimom - kill
midcon01- kill
midcon03 - kill
originat - kill
richardtom - kill
tarapiazze - kill
transport - kill
vladipimen - log in 1/30/01  Vladi Pimenov  (keep)

If possible, please respond back by tomorrow, Jan 31.

Thank you,

Stephanie x33465


Kay, looks great to me.  I would prefer to leave the benchmark open and be
able to talk the counterparty through how it will be established (due
diligence on plants, higher target means greater sharing % for ENE).  As far
as cancellation is concerned, I think that it would be a good idea to include
a right of cancellation for NRG based on a percentage of the benchmark
established.  Something to the effect that NRG will have the annual right to
terminate the agreement if we cannot achieve __% of the annual gross margin
target.

Thanks-
Bill

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mann, Kay
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 12:36 PM
To: Keeney, William
Cc: May, Tom; Marks, David; Scheuer, Janelle
Subject: Re: NRG bullet points

I've made some revisions the Bill's document to make sure we are on the same
page before I prepare the LOI.

 << File: NRG Term Sheet.doc >>

Do we want to give any sort of description of how the benchmark will be set?
Do we want to mention the cancellation provisions?

Thanks,

Kay


As always, everything that was discussed today is highly confidential, particularly bonus percentages, and should not be discussed with anyone.

Regards, Rob
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cappelletto, Nella   On Behalf Of Milnthorp, Rob
Sent:	Friday, January 18, 2002 1:50 PM
To:	Bardal, Chelsea; Biever, Jason; Brodeur, Stephane; Burnham, Steven; Clark, Chad; Cowan, Mike; Crawford, Sharon; Davies, Derek; Dawes, Cheryl; Donlevy-Lee, Kelly; Dorland, Chris; Dorland, Dan; Draper, Lon; Drozdiak, Dean; Gillis, Brian; Hanslip, David; Hedstrom, Peggy; Hemstock, Robert; Hrap, Gerry; Johnston, Greg; Keohane, Peter; Lalani, Sean; Lambie, Chris; Le Dain, Eric; Liknes, Angela; Luc, Albert; Macphee, Mike; Martin, Brad; McCulloch, Angela; Moscoso, Mirna; Oh, Grant; O'Neil, Carla; Panchuk, Kate; Patterson, Grant; Prior, Liz; Quon, Sandra; Reeves, Kathy; Richey, Cooper; Ripley, Dianne; Rondeau, Clayton; Sangwine, Howard; Savidant, Michael; Scott, Laura; Seib, Dianne; Tackney, Conal; Taylor, Fabian; Tripp, Garrett; Unger, Chris; Vander velde, Nikole; Watt, Ryan; Zufferli, John
Subject:	Meeting Today at 2:30 today in Video Room #1

There will be a meeting today to discuss the UBS transaction with Enron
at 2:30 pm Calgary time, 4:30 pm Toronto time, in Video Room #1.
The Toronto office should be video conferenced in at that time.
Please note this meeting is intended for all staff addressed above.
Thank you.
Rob Milnthorp


Attached below please find a revised, red-lined version of the Request to
Reopen Proceedings by CRRA.  The changes reflect comments received by Scott
Healy.

Sandra -- you should have everything from me now expect for the Heat Rate
Degradation Curve (that will go under Environmental Benefits) and possibly an
updated Emissions Chart.  I will  forward these items to you as soon as
possible on Monday.

Regards,

Heather


Chad -- Good to see you the other day.  Please give me a call when you return
to your office.  I am embarrassed to say that I am not sure I have the right
version of the Operating Agreement we sent you in March...if we can compare
notes, I can make sure I get the correct one to you without further delay.

Thank you!

Susan Scott
Transwestern Pipeline Company
(713) 853-0596


When: Monday, July 30, 2001 1:00 PM-5:00 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where: EB3127

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*


Do you want to do this?
-----Original Message-----
From: Engler, Adrianne
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 5:03 PM
To: Curry, Mike; Forster, David; Kitchen, Louise; Kroll, Heather; Lagrasta, Fred; Luce, Laura; Mrha, Jean; Redmond, Brian; Tricoli, Carl; Tycholiz, Barry; Vickers, Frank
Cc: Martinez, Judy; Shoemake, Lisa; Schoppe, Tammie; Harvey, Claudette; Young, Becky; Hogan, Irena D.; Jones, Melissa; Holcombe, Tina ; Presas, Jessica; Buckley, Karen; Solis, Felicia; Berry, Lara
Subject: Origination Track

All -

Please note on your calendars we are anticipating holding the Origination Track interviews Wednesday, November 28 from 11am - 2pm with a debrief session to follow.

Further details to follow (location and resumes of candidates).

Thank you for your participation in these interviews.

Please contact either Karen Buckley (x54667) or myself with any questions.

Kind regards,

Adrianne Engler
x57302


You are welcome.  Take care.  Mark

	Peter Keohane
	01/16/2001 10:34 AM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Thanks

Mark, thanks for the confidence and support you continue to show in me with
the recent promotion.  I hope to meet expectations.

Peter.


ENRJ_CISO_8000 has been corrected for the whole day.  There is now a load zone under the STSW book in SDG1 to reflect these changes.  Hourly templates are in for hours 1-24 and Isaac at the ISO is aware of the changes made.  No changes were/are necessary to the tags.

Dean

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Meyers, Albert
Sent:	Tuesday, January 01, 2002 4:58 PM
To:	Dean, Craig
Cc:	Williams III, Bill
Subject:	Imports for 01/02/02 @ Mead

Craig and Bill:

Please note that for Wednesday 01/02/02, Import ID ENRJ_CISO_8000 is wrong.  The On-peak needs to be a 35mw and the off-peak needs to be a 45mw.  You will want to change the load zones in SP15 to make us flat in position manager.

Thanks,

Bert Meyers


Dear Vince,

It is my great pleasure to confirm your participation at Energy & Power Risk
Management 2001 on May 14th. Please take a moment to look at the current
line-up on the attached draft program. I have held a position on the panel
discussion if you wish to take part. The current talk titles are based upon
our telephone conversations and I am happy to discuss any potential changes.
I would like to confirm the following details by Thursday, January 18th:

Final talk title
Bullet points (5-6)
Full name, job title, company title
Postal address

I am sure that you will agree that this year, Energy & Power Risk Management
,s annual event provides a wide range of highly topical sessions. I look
forward to receiving your full presentation details and meeting you in May.

Yours sincerely,

Paul Bristow
Conferences Manager, US
Risk Waters Group
270 Lafayette Street
Suite 7
New York 10012
212 925 6990 ext 225
pbristow@riskwaters.com

 - revspktemp2.doc


I think that you and Allan misunderstood the request from Nelson Wu.  If you
look at his resume, is already with Enron as an Associate.  His e:mail to
Allan Sommer seems to indicate that he is interested in a rotation in Allan's
group.  Normally, I think that associates talk directly with someone in a
group in which they may have an interest.  I don't think that HR gets
involved in this process.  I am not sure how I got into this loop.  It seems
that if Allan has an interest in having an Associate do a rotation in his
group then he should talk with Nelson.  --Sally

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Edward Anderson @ ENRON                           07/27/2000 12:25 PM

To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Request for Interview, Associate Rotation

Sally,
 I think this one is for you.  Please do with it as you see fit.
Regards,
Ed Anderson
5-8265

---------------------- Forwarded by Edward Anderson/Corp/Enron on 07/27/2000
12:15 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Allan Sommer                           07/27/2000 12:15 PM

To: Nelson_Wu@enron.net
cc: Edward Anderson/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Request for Interview, Associate Rotation

Nelson,

Please contact Ed Anderson at HR to schedule the interview.  Thanks.

Allan Sommer

Nelson_Wu@enron.net on 07/26/2000 07:49:46 PM
To: allan.sommer@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Request for Interview, Associate Rotation

Hi Allan:

I  am  writing  you  to express my strong interest in working at Enron Net
Works
International Private Equity.  I am confident that my experience has prepared
me
with  the  broad  skills  and finance expertise necessary for success in
Private
Equity.

The rigorous curriculum in the Anderson School at UCLA has not only confirmed
my
interest in Finance, but also enhanced my accounting skills. After
graduation, I
spent  the first four months of my rotation program in Enron at the Asia
Pacific
Structuring  Group. There I honed my analytical skills, commercial knowledge
and
cross-functional team experience through financial modeling and risk
assessment.
I  provided  robust  analytical  support that resulted in a successful bid
for a
$550  million  power  project in China.  In the past five months at the
Business
Development   Group  of  Enron  Broadband  Services,  I  managed  the
strategic
relationship  between  Enron  and  Microsoft. The deal management tasks
required
broad-based   problem-solving   skills,   effective   communication  and
strong
understanding  of  the technology market. Recently I also proposed and led a
new
initiative in developing broadband online gaming content for the Enron
streaming
media business.

I  have  attached  my resume which details my accomplishments. I look forward
to
speaking with you and further discuss my credentials in a personal interview.
(See attached file: Associate_NelsonWu0725.doc)
Best Regards,

Nelson Wu
58298

 - Associate_NelsonWu0725.doc


Jackie,

Legal is reviewing the Terms of Business document for Credit Lyonnais and Monument Derivatives.

For Equities and Options, we will trade as ECT Investments, Inc.  with all clearing through Goldman Sachs International and Morgan Stanley & Co.

For Futures, we will trade as Enron North America Corp. with Give-up to Carr Futures and Deutsche Banc Alex Brown Inc. We are currently in the process of setting up the Deutsche Bank agreement.  Rob Manders, 212-469-2034, Rob.Manders@db.com,  may be contacted for more information.

Legal thought that for the futures we only require your give-up agreements to Carr and DB and will not need the Terms of Business Agreement on the Futures side.

Please advise.
Sheila


Jennifer,

What a cutie!  Meg is adorable and so grown up now!  She should start talking
before long if she has not already.  I'm sure that you are teaching her to
say Stacy.  I hope you guys are doing well.  I understand Mr Espey is not
doing as well as hoped.  That must be particularly difficult for you guys
since you are not near by.

When do you think that you will be in Houston again?  We miss you guys.  We
got used to your being around last year.

Meredith is doing well.  She is starting to sit well on her own.  She still
does an occasional face-plant though.  It really makes her mad when she
does.  She loves her exersaucer.  We went to Arkansas for Easter so Meredith
had her first plane ride.  She did very well.  I can't imagine entertaining a
baby for five hours on a plane like you do!  Meredith has not mastered cereal
yet.  We only feed her twice a week which does not help.  We keep joking that
she will still be on formula when she goes to kindergarden!

I will send some picutures of Meredith soon.

Stacy


Hey, it worked great--I replicated several sets of messages without a
problem.  Then, on Sunday, I did something and now can't get the computer to
load up windows.  It stalls out on the "Property of ET&S" screen right after
I turn it on.  Please make it happy again and ship it back up.  (I don't know
if this would cause such a problem, but I may have shut off the computer off
on saturday before I got the message saying "it is now safe to shut off your
computer."  )  Thanks. DF


Rita,

I am mailing you the original Columbia Gas invoices for Feb and Mar and a copy of what I have for December.  I don't have the January invoices and I have requested a copy from Jeanne Adkins assistant at Columbia Gas.  I will also ask to have these sent to your attention in the future.

I gave Maria a copy of everything I'm mailing to you.

Thanks


Please email me your draft of the confirm.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


NYMEX Membership Services
April 6, 2001
Notice # MS-23

NOTICE OF INTENTION TO TRANSFER

Please be advised that effective with the close of business, April 6, 2001,
he following member(s) have given notice of intention to transfer their sole
Membership within the Exchange:

Albert H. Helmig (ALBT-4536)

NOTICE OF INTENTION TO LEASE ORIGINAL MEMBERSHIP

Please be advised that effective with the close of business, April 6, 2001,
the following member(s) have given notice of intention to lease their sole
membership privileges:

Gerard Cunningham (JERR-4455)

SWITCH OF LESSOR

Please be advised that effective with the close of business, April 6, 2001,
the following member(s) will switch their lessor within the Exchange:

Thomas Ryan (NUTZ-6125)

 Members and Member Firms have (10) days from the date of this notice to
advise the Corporate Secretary,s Office of any claims in accordance with Rule
2.51.

 Inquiries regarding the above should be addressed to the Member Services
Department (212) 299-2379.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=mark.taylor@enron.com&refd
oc=(MS-23)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


Guzman,

Willamette enpower deals were still entered in incorrectly for 12/20, and
made it through the SAR that way.  I fixed them this morning.

Concerning IPC, I cannot tell from your email if you spoke with IPC or what
resolution you arrived at.  If EPMI is found to be responsible and you are
unable to resolve the issue, you need to draft a letter to me with all the
appropriate information concerning the trade.   I will then explain the
discrepancy to EPE.  Please get me the complete information as quickly as
possible.

Thank you,

Bill


Wayne:

Please reply to Carol after you have been able to investigate.

Thanks, Alan

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	St. Clair, Carol
Sent:	Thursday, December 06, 2001 1:24 PM
To:	Aronowitz, Alan; Gresham, Wayne
Cc:	Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	Coal Termination

Alan and Wayne:
We received a letter from AEP Energy Services Inc. terminating all coal transactions with ENA as of 12/1.  The letter states that they shall begin liquidating the contracts on 12/3.  We have been instructed by Sally Beck's group to identify any terminated transactions that should be taken out of the book.  Should these and if so, which transactions are these?

Carol St. Clair
EB 4539
713-853-3989 (phone)
713-646-3393 (fax)
281-382-1943 (cell phone)
8774545506 (pager)
281-890-8862 (home fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


Larry Joe Hunter
	03/12/2001 08:31 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Canadian Annex

Tana,

Can you e-mail to me the new Canadian Annex?

Thanks,
Joe


Phil,

Wednesday would work for me.

Vince

08/21/2000 07:22 PM
Phil Sisneros@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
Phil Sisneros@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
Phil Sisneros@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
08/21/2000 07:22 PM
08/21/2000 07:22 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Vince:

i'm in town wed/thurs/fri--let me know if dinner on wed or thurs works for you


Jeff:
Just a heads up, I am meeting with Gary Pfeiffer, CFO in a couple of weeks to brief him on discussions we have been having with a team of DuPont managers about a deal that looks a bit like the Lilly deal, DuPont's outsourcing of its Corporate campus, including a number of lab buildings in Wilmington.

As you remember, we met with Pfeiffer and a few others here on 50 to discuss their risk mgmt strategies around gas....those discussions went nowhere, but we are now back and actively engaged with personnel in his group on this outsource opportunity.

Doubt he would call, but  I wanted you in the loop.
Michael


<<99_1206 CFEE Real Presentation.ppt>>

Kirk Marckwald
Principal
California Environmental Associates
423 Washington Street, 3rd Floor
San Francisco, CA 94115
kirk@cea.sfex.com
415-421-4213, ext. 102 - voice
415-982-7989 - fax

 - 99_1206 CFEE Real Presentation.ppt


The CAISO is still talking about a day-ahead and hour-ahead energy market; day-ahead unit commitment; and a clearing market for overlapping inc and dec bids.

http://www1.caiso.com/docs/2001/08/02/200108020756563477.pdf


Fran Mays is the HR contact person x37211


----- Forwarded by Jeff Leath/NA/Enron on 12/04/2000 01:57 PM -----

	"Johnson, Beverly" <Beverly.Johnson@the-woodlands.net>
	12/04/2000 01:48 PM

		 To: "'jeff.leath@enron.com'" <jeff.leath@enron.com>
		 cc: "Wallin, Kelli" <Kelli.Wallin@the-woodlands.net>, "Hudson, Coleman"
<Coleman.Hudson@the-woodlands.net>
		 Subject: Strategic Sourcing Conference

ENRON STRATEGIC SOURCING
FOLIO # 336135
10/8-11/00
MR. JEFF LEATH
PHONE: 713-646-6165
FAX: 713-646-6313

Jeff,

Per our conversation this morning, I will list the items in question.  I am
also forwarding this to Kelli Wallin in our accounting department to follow
up on as well.

* ACCOUNTING:  Please see that all service charges were posted as 18%,
per contract
* JEFF: I will fax you the comp ticket showing the 1 hour reception
posted to The Woodlands House account.
* ACCOUNTING: Please fax Jeff the back up for the package handling
charges. $451.35
* ACCOUNTING: Please adjust (1) wireless mouse charge for a total of
$156.41
* JEFF: In regards to the lunch charges, we charged a day guest rate
to include lunch in The Woodlands Dining Room @ $57.00 for  40 day
attendees.  You had 80 persons on the Complete Meeting Package.  However,
when coordinating with Tracey Kozadinos, she ordered and guaranteed 100 box
lunches @ $5.50 per person surcharge for the golf.  Thus, 80+40=120 - 100
(box lunches) would leave 20 persons permitted to have lunch in The
Woodlands Dining Room.  We billed you for the total amount of persons over
the 20 permitted in the Woodlands Dining Room.
* JEFF: Breakout charges were for (2) rooms.  Enron had a guarantee of
120 attendees.  We allow (1) breakout per 40 attendees.  This particular
day, (5) breakouts were ordered.  The audio visual in the additional
breakouts is based on a-la-carte pricing and is not included in the package.
Only av is included in the rooms that are part of the allocation.

Jeff, I will see that the adjustments are forwarded to you as soon as
possible in order to remit for payment.  Please feel free to call me should
you have further questions.  Thank you for your business!

Beverly J. Johnson
Conference Planning Manager
The Woodlands Resort & Conference Center
(281) 364-6234 -- Direct Dial
(281) 364-6338 -- Fax


<<CSFB_EnergyTech_nov16.pdf>>

Summary of Energy Technology Bulletin:

* Dynetek, which develops, manufactures, and markets lightweight fuel
storage systems, announced that its newest fuel storage system (5000 psi)
would increase the range of fuel cell vehicles by over 30% relative to
current designs.
* California Governor Gray Davis signed a bill in late September
creating incentives for the purchase or lease of new zero emission vehicles
(ZEV).  While the details of the program are to be proposed on December 7th
and 8th in Sacremento, individual grants of up to $9,000 over three years
($3,000 per year) may be offered to consumers, both private and public, who
purchase or lease ZEVs.
* Innogy Technology Ventures received approval from the Tennessee
Valley Authority (TVA) to build a regenerative fuel cell power plant in
Mississippi using the company's Regenesys technology.  A regenerative fuel
cell stores and releases electrical energy through a reversible
electrochemical reaction using two salt electrolytes.

Regards,

Energy Technology Research
CREDIT | FIRST
SUISSE | BOSTON

Marko Pencak (Hardware)
Neil Stein (Independent Power and e-Commerce)
Cameron Jeffreys (Associate)

 - CSFB_EnergyTech_nov16.pdf


Keegan,  Please print out two executables of the attached on bond paper.  Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Johnson, Rudwell
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 10:41 AM
To: Nemec, Gerald
Cc: Schockling, Gregory
Subject: FW: FW: Guaranty Form.Bridgeline Holdings

Gerard!

Would you kindly prepare this for execution.

Thanks
Rudwell
35396.

-----Original Message-----
From: Billyoung3@aol.com [mailto:Billyoung3@aol.com]
Sent: Friday, November 2, 2001 9:16 AM
To: Johnson, Rudwell
Cc: jervin@spinexp.com; rsnell@spinexp.com
Subject: Re: FW: Guaranty Form.Bridgeline Holdings

Rudwell -
       Please have attached executed today and messengered to Spinnaker at address contained therein.

Attention : Jason Ervin

Thanks,
                  Bill

William N. Young, III
Gathering and Energy Marketing CO Energy, Inc.
4355 Sylvanfield Drive, Suite 110
Houston, Texas 77014
281-586-7155 phone
281-586-7701 fax
281-804-8812 cell


----- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 06/11/2001 10:49 AM -----

	Edward Sacks/ENRON@enronXgate
	06/11/2001 07:06 AM

		 To: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Tracy
Ngo/ENRON@enronXgate
		 cc: Veronica Gonzalez/ENRON@enronXgate
		 Subject: SoCal Edison - Margin Call - Proposed Trust Agreement

SoCal may have some issues providing margin in the form of L/Cs and cash due
to bank and forbearance restricitions.  Attached is a proposal to provide
collateral through a Trust Acct structure.  Please review.

Ed Sacks

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Benny.Wu@sce.com@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Benny+2EWu+40sce+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 7:13 PM
To: Sacks, Edward
Cc: Jill.Horswell@sce.com
Subject: SCE proposed Trust Agreement

Mr. Sacks

Here's the SCE proposed Trust Agreement for your review.  Please note that
it is in DRAFT form subject to changes.

(See attached file: Enron Trust.doc)

We will be contacting you on Monday for your response.

Thanks...

Benny Wu
Southern California Edison Company
Phone 626-302-3230
Fax 626-302-3254
 - Enron Trust.doc


what do you want for eddie?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Winfree, O'Neal D.
Sent:	Wednesday, October 10, 2001 8:35 AM
To:	Bass, Eric
Subject:	RE:

moulds for mack... O

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bass, Eric
Sent:	Wednesday, October  10, 2001 8:27 AM
To:	Winfree, O'Neal D.
Subject:

moulds for alstott?


Congratulations! Your company project was selected by the students for the
2001 Action Learning Project program at Rice University. The Company Day was
a huge success last week, and we appreciate all your time and effort. On
Monday, January 22, we will send you a list of your team members via email
with a hard copy to follow. Student team members will be in touch soon so
that you can plan your first meeting.

Thanks for your continued support and interest in the Jones School.

======================================
Carrie Chamberlin Miller
Director of MBA Program
Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of Management
Rice University
6100 Main Street, MS 531
Houston, Texas 77005-1892
Phone: (713) 348-5260
Fax: (713) 348-5251
E-mail: cmiller@rice.edu
http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~jgs/


FYI
----- Forwarded by Barton Clark/HOU/ECT on 09/12/2000 10:06 AM -----

	"Silvers, Bruce C." <silverbc@bingham.com>
	08/29/2000 08:39 AM

		 To: "'Barton Clark'" <Barton.Clark@enron.com>, Heather Kroll
<Heather.Kroll@enron.com>
		 cc: "Pasqualini, Martin J." <PASQUAMJ@bingham.com>, "Politan, Nicholas H."
<PolitaNH@bingham.com>
		 Subject: RE: Presentation

Given the time constraint, I thought I'd give you a brief summary of the law
here in Connecticut and some thoughts on how to proceed.

The Connecticut courts and the Freedom of Information Commission (the
"FOIC"), the agency charged with the enforcement of FOIA, have repeatedly
held that CRRA, CDA and DECD are public agencies within the purview of FOIA
(I have not had time to consider whether the same is true for DEP, CPUC and
the other attendees, but suspect that it is so with respect to certain of
them).  FOIA provides, among other things, that all documents obtained or
kept by a public agency are public records available to the public, unless
otherwise exempted from disclosure by special statute or by the exemptions
delineated by FOIA.

While there is no special statute with regard to CRRA, a special statute,
Conn. Gen. Stat. Section 32-11a(k), exempts certain materials and
information submitted to DECD and to CDA from public disclosure.  Section
32-11a(k) states that all information  contained in any application for
financial assistance submitted to DECD or CDA, and all information obtained
by the DECD or CDA with respect to any person or project is exempt from
disclosure under the FOIA.  The statute specifies that this exemption
includes all financial, credit and proprietary information.  I have not had
time to consider whether there are special statutory exemptions provided for
similar information submitted to the other attendees.

Consequently, FOIA governs the confidentiality of all information submitted
to CRRA and, perhaps, certain of the other attendees and the confidentiality
of information submitted to DECD and CDA falling outside Section 32-11a(k)'s
exemption.

As may be pertinent in these circumstances, FOIA exempts from disclosure:
(1) preliminary drafts under certain circumstances, (2) trade secrets and
commercial or financial information given in confidence, and that is not
required by statute to be disclosed to an agency, (3) real estate
appraisals, engineering or feasiblity estimates or evaluations for an agency
relative to the acquisition of property or to prospective public supply and
construction contracts, but only until such time as the property is acquired
or the transaction abandoned, (4) tax returns, reports and statements
exempted by federal law or state statutes, and (5) communications privileged
by the attorney-client relationship.

While the Connecticut courts and FOIC have held that the confidentiality of
information submitted to agencies subject to FOIA is determined by
applicable law rather that the representations or agreements of the parties,
they have suggested that measures designed to preserve confidentiality may
be considered in making that determination.

While your notice cites a May 19, 2000 Agreement of Confidentiality
previously executed by CRRA and Enron (which I have not seen), obviously
that will not be binding upon any attendees not a party to it and, while it
would be better to have the other attendees execute a written agreement
regarding confidentiality, I understand that that may not be practical given
the timing and the number of parties involved.
Accordingly, I recommend that the following other steps be employed with
respect to confidential information submitted to the attendees:

1.  All documents and information submitted to the attendees should be
marked "Preliminary Draft".

2.  In the fourth paragraph of your notice, change clause (1) to read "the
Subject Information is being provided to it in confidence, contains trade
secrets and/or confidential commercial, financial and proprietary
information and other information exempt from disclosure under certain laws
of the State of Connecticut, and it will maintain the confidentiality of the
Subject Information".

3. You should take steps, internally, to ensure the confidentiality of the
information you submit to the agencies.  Appropriate measures would include:
(a) limiting access to confidential information to a "need to know" basis,
(b) entering into confidentiality agreements with others involved in the
project with respect to their studies, analyses, etc., for the project, (c)
advising your personnel (secretarial, etc.), in writing, that the
information is confidential and of the need to maintain such information in
confidence, and (d) maintaining confidential information in locked or
otherwise private files.

5. A request should be made by you to the agencies that confidential
information  be discussed by the agencies in executive session.

If we take these measures with regard to information supplied to the
agencies, we will enhance the likelihood of maintaining the confidentiality
of the information in response to a public request for disclosure of the
information pursuant to the FOIA.  Should you wish to discuss this matter in
more detail, please do not hesitate to call me at (860) 240-2943.

-----Original Message-----
From: Barton Clark [mailto:Barton.Clark@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2000 4:07 PM
To: Heather Kroll
Cc: silverbc@bingham.com
Subject: Presentation

I suggest adding the attached in as the first page of text in the
presentation
materials and call the attendee's attention to it at the commencement of the
presentation. If there is a problem with its length, I would suggest
deleting
the laundry list of attendees in the first paragraph and the third paragraph
only. Also, I did not have time to check with Conn counsel on the procedures
for
public disclosure in Conn alluded to generally in the fourth paragraph, but
by
copy hereof am requesting they review the language of the Notice and give us
any
comments. When do the materials have to be distributed?

(See attached file: Notice to Recipients of Presentation Materials.doc)


See if this meets your needs.  I added Red Rock to 2001 Current Estimate for a comparison
       to 2002 Plan.  Also did a 100% Throughput West.

       James

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayslett, Rod
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 12:44 PM
To:	Centilli, James
Cc:	Geaccone, Tracy
Subject:	RE: Expansion Fuel Analysis

CAn you give me something that can be used to estimate the fuel available for sale?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Centilli, James
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 10:58 AM
To:	Hayslett, Rod
Cc:	Geaccone, Tracy
Subject:	Expansion Fuel Analysis

Analysis based on information from Facility Planning.

James

 << File: twfuelanal.xls >>


Joe, Mike,

Please check with PR first if we want too talk to her
and run  it by Mark. I think it is in our interest to be
quotes extensively in the press.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 10/12/2000
10:53 AM ---------------------------

EnergyWriter@aol.com on 10/11/2000 10:54:39 AM
Please respond to EnergyWriter@aol.com
To: energywriter@aol.com
cc:
Subject: Report Research

I am writing a management report on weather risk management. The story
will discuss different weather risk management tools used by power
marketers in the energy industry. It also looks at weather prediction
and analysis services available to energy traders.

I am looking for a list and description of the weather risk management
products, and how each can benefit an energy trader. I would also like
to know what  traders' reactions to significant weather are. And where
can I find a list of popular weather instruments with descriptions?

I appreciate any help you can give me. I would like to set up a chat
with you this week if you have the time, or simply email me your input.
Thanks in advance!

Barbara Drazga
Independent Journalist
PO Box 472401
Aurora, CO 80047
303-369-3533 tel.
303-369-3510 fax


Calif briefing


My worksheet has a lot of support for the pricing we billed for January.

Take a look at the worksheet and give me a call.  We probably will not be
able to cover everything at once.

We still have a few items to bill.  I will let you know what those items are
and when we expect to bill them.


Andrea,

Based on discussions with D'Arcy on the commercial terms of the proposal we
want to offer to Champion, I've made a few changes to the attachment of the
Champion draft contract that I would like you to take a look at (sorry Brent,
but they are in Portuguese in the interest of getting this deal done ASAP).

The basics are as follows:

If Champion has a Load Factor above 91%:

They pay a final price that could be a max of R$ 42.72/MWh or a min of R$
40/MWh.  The final price will be determined based on an indexation formula
that will dictate the exact fluctuation [D'Arcy, I think we should have a
more final formula to include so please review it].

If Champion has a Load Factor equal or below 91%:

They pay a demand charge of R$ 3.16/kW (assuming the contracted demand is
3000 kW), and R$ 40.28/MWh that they consume.  To be honest this doesn't give
us any real protection on the demand charge side, but it's consistent with a
previous agreement with Elektro.  Ideally I would like to see Champion
committ to a min take or pay of say 50% of the energy.  We need further
confirmation on these numbers from Luiz Ot?vio and Baccaro (the idea was to
use the same numbers of the Elektro contract, but assuming the increase that
you got).

The idea is to make this contract a little simpler than what D'Arcy had in
mind initially in the interest of getting the deal done by the end of this
month (we need verbal confirmation tomorrow though to inform volumes to the
MAE).

Please send your comments asap.

Claudia

D'Arcy Carroll
08/24/99 06:07 PM
To: Brent Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Andrea Bertone/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Claudia
Brun/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Don
Black/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sara Shackleton@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
lotavio@elektro.com.br, baccaro@elektro.com.br

Subject: Re: Champion - legal

Pls see comments. (and note that have forwarded proposal separately).

Brent Hendry
08/24/99 04:14 PM
To: D'Arcy Carroll/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Andrea Bertone/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Claudia
Brun/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Don
Black/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sara Shackleton@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Re: Champion - legal

I am still somewhat unclear on the indexing structure but I will specify what
I see the deal as and you can correct me if I get it wrong.
When the deal was described to me it sounded like we were buying a floor and
that we would imbed the floor into the physical power deal.  After looking at
the structure you sent it looks like they are the ones buying the floor.
They are getting paid (by virtue of the reduced cost of energy) if the spot
goes below the strike.
now i'm confused (!) - Champion will benefit from a fall in paper prices
through a reduction in the cost of their energy, limited to a minimum of R$40
with an original and maximum price of R$42.75; defer to you for advice on how
to best structure this i.e., theoretically, both Champion and Enron S.A.  are
"buying" puts, floor (Champion from ECE and ECE from Enron N.A.) -  but, yes
absolutely no question, ECE would prefer to imbed the product in its energy
sale, so that Champion only sees floating price with possible adjustments to
the downside

Based on your email this is how I think the deal would be structured.

We supply on a firm basis 3MW of energy for three months.

They pay a floating price for the energy based on the following formula:
R$42.75 minus an amount, if positive, equal to [factor] multiplied by the
difference between [a strike price in R$] and the Spot Price.  The Spot Price
will be in R$ per pound of a paper product quoted in R$ [which is to be
defined]. (I did not understand your third bullet point very well.  The
relationship between the two indexes was unclear and contrary to your formula
it did not appear that these indexes were quoted in R$.  Please clarify these
issues for me.)   Formula: R$42.75 * (Avg. (decrease) Index price - Spot or
Floor Price)/Spot or Floor Price  (Page 2 of proposal "Tarifa") eg adjusted
each month on the % decrease in the monthly index average Note: would like
prefer to set the Spot or Benchmark Price at outset.

The R$ versus Pounds/Metric Ton issues are very good points - defer to you, I
think, Brent/Andrea for preferred structure; in this case, Champion will I
think defer to us.  We can ask how they execute for their exports and
R$/Pounds exposure.

 We will need to know where and when to pick up the spot price so that
everyone understands what published price will be used each month when the
price is determined.  The [factor] will be something you will need to come up
with to correlate the volumes you are hedging with the amount of electricity
actually sold.  We will also need to make clear if there will be a floor on
how low the price can go. R$40.MWh Do you intend for the price to be able to
go below zero?  If so, what do you intend to happen?  Based on your answers
we will need to go to outside counsel to make sure we do not violate the
Brazilian anti-gaming laws or any regulations.

I may have missed the point of how the trade is supposed to work so any
additional information would be helpful before we go to outside counsel.
Thanks.

D'Arcy Carroll
24/08/99 05:44 PM
To: Andrea Bertone, Brent Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Claudia Brun, Don Black
Subject: Champion - legal

Pls find overview listed re ECE-Champion-Elektro transaction:

ECE selling equivalent of 3MW (Peak- and Off-peak) energy eg consumption
take-or-pay for period Sep - Oct - Nov
Price will be R$42.75 which represents 5% discount to present average Elektro
rate of R$45
ECE wants to adjust on a monthly basis the R$42.75 sales price downward
should the price of PPI UK A$ cut size 80g index or the PPI UK A4  Reels 60g
index average below Strike Price x (Pounds per Metric Ton).  The adjustment
will be based on formula: Avg. Monthly hedged volume * (Index avg-Strike
Price) * R$/Pound spot price

We are trying to finalize negotiations this afternoon re both the energy sale
and the incorporated index and strike etc.,... and should feel like we have
substantial flexibility to articulate how best to structure the
transaction.    Pls shoot any/all inputs including needs for additional
information.


I agree with Christian that we cannot win over the WSPP folks simply by telling them that their contract is not as good as ours.  Everytime I venture out to the larger NW community of IOUs, munis, and federal PMA's I realize that the WSPP is more than a contract, it's almost a religion.  One cannot convince a Muslim that the Bible is better written than the Koran.

Whether it's assimilation or merger, or the hint that the WSPP might be destined for a larger role in advocacy and education, we need to give Mike Small a face-saving way of relinquishing the WSPP contract.  Modifying the WSPP to look like the EEI only strengthens the resolve of WSPP-ers to stick with the original contract.---"Why should I change, the agreements are virtually identical?"

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Yoder, Christian
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 9:28 AM
To:	Sager, Elizabeth
Cc:	Hall, Steve C. (Legal)
Subject:	FW: Legal Discussion

Elizabeth,

I am going to divide my presentation into two parts.  One is going to be designed to give the marketers "talking points"  and the other is going to be a technical thing where I show them some bad wording and tell a couple of scary war stories.

I would like to get your take on the following kind of big picture Enron policy on WSPP approach. Unless you agree with and support this kind of "How Enron views the WSPP" policy, I shouldn't be advocating it at the meeting.

Enron's view is that the days of comparing the WSPP Agreement to the EEI should be coming to an end.  It is time for a joint committee of WSPP and EEI experts to merge the agreements.  Everybody is wasting too much time comparing the two agreements and trying to say one is better than the other.  Every amendment that has been made in the past two years brings the agreements closer and closer into alignment and it is preposterous for any serious lawyer to argue that we are better off with two agreements, one that is almost like the other one.  Valuable resource time is being wasted.  Enron believes that a joint committee should accelerate the merger of the agreements.

 This will free up the WSPP organization to do what it does best:  provide an extremely useful industry formum kind of function.  The WSPP should be focusing on more boondoggles and more future looking work like getting ready for RTO West, dealing with the emerging California changes, and open access in Oregon and Nevada.   Right now, the highly talented regional organization is spending an unfortunate amount of time trying to distinguish its contract from the EEI when both are converging toward the same center.  This unfortunate distraction is keeping the WSPP from adding the tremendous value it does add through its boondoggles and industry issue discussions. The WSPP organization is needed for bigger and better things than dragging us through an ever narrowing labyrinth of legal distinctions.

We need this kind of glazed over positive spin on the WSPP process because our marketers do not like to be isolated from the cozy herd at these boondoggles.  Sales people do not want to feel alone and different.  They are all about the slimy intimacy of sales.  It is hard for Stewart Rosman to go to Cour d'Lane and have Greg Wolf and Shari Stack confront him with difficult questions about why Enron is voting so and so on such and such.  He wants to feel loved.  Therefore,  this policy would let our marketers praise the WSPP for being a great organization,  but at the same time, advocate that it become even greater by declaring victory on the contract front and shifting over to more important projects.  Rosman should say:  Enron loves the WSPP,  it has done a great job with the contract reformation,  that task is done,  we now should move on to bigger and better tasks.  Let's get the contract stuff wrapped up with a joint committee and get more important matters on the agenda.

Something like this is what we need to do with this ongoing mess.  Otherwise, we pit Enron's clearmindedness  against a stubborn mass of  inert resistance and much toxic upheaval is the only result.
The world, including our little western power world, is not made up of people sitting around trying to be rational.  It is full of all of the conflicts of history, ambitious tirades, irrational idiocyncracies and strong personalities.  The WSPP institution is like one of the warring tribes of Lebanon.  They are not going to go away.  Enron needs to be more subtle in its regional diplomacy.  Praise them as we bury them on the contract front.  As our headquarters commander, I beg you to  let Steve and me, as field operatives,   pursue this diplomatic initiative over the next months. We can wind these guys up to talk this kind of talk next Wednesday.   One consequence of the policy is that you would have to urge the EEI bureacracy to embrace a joint committee approach.   ----cgy

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rosman, Stewart
Sent:	Friday, October 19, 2001 3:02 PM
To:	Choi, Paul; Malowney, John; Van Gelder, John; Lackey, Chris; Buerkle, Jim
Cc:	Belden, Tim; Calger, Christopher F.; Yoder, Christian; Hall, Steve C. (Legal)
Subject:	Legal Discussion

Christian Yoder has graciously agreed to host a symposium comparing and contrasting the WSPP and the EEI.  The meeting will take place on Oct 31 (Halloween) at 1:00 PM in Mt Bachelor.

Stewart


Sue, Alan, Mary --

Can the three of you determine how best to cover this report and ensuring
that the desk has the right information ASAP?  I assume that we can take away
most of the information by just reading the report.

This may prove to be nothing more than another exercise in futility by the
ISO, but we should cover this to make sure nothing negative is implemented.

Jim

----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 03/07/2001 06:36 AM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	03/06/2001 08:06 PM

		 To: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Angela Schwarz/HOU/EES@EES, Beverly
Aden/HOU/EES@EES, Bill Votaw/HOU/EES@EES, Brenda Barreda/HOU/EES@EES, Carol
Moffett/HOU/EES@EES, Cathy Corbin/HOU/EES@EES, Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Christina Liscano/HOU/EES@EES, Craig H Sutter/HOU/EES@EES, Dan
Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Debora Whitehead/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES,
Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Dorothy Youngblood/HOU/ECT@ECT, Douglas
Huth/HOU/EES@EES, Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Eric Melvin/HOU/EES@EES,
Erika Dupre/HOU/EES@EES, Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Fran Deltoro/HOU/EES@EES,
Gayle W Muench/HOU/EES@EES, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@ENRON, Gordon
Savage/HOU/EES@EES, Harold G Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@ENRON, Iris Waser/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, James Wright/Western
Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, Jeff Messina/HOU/EES@EES, Jeremy
Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Jess Hewitt/HOU/EES@EES, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathy Bass/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy
Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES, Ken Gustafson/HOU/EES@EES, Kevin Hughes/HOU/EES@EES,
Leasa Lopez/HOU/EES@EES, Leticia Botello/HOU/EES@EES, Mark S
Muller/HOU/EES@EES, Marsha Suggs/HOU/EES@EES, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES,
Meredith M Eggleston/HOU/EES@EES, Michael Etringer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Mann/HOU/EES@EES, Michelle D Cisneros/HOU/ECT@ECT, mpalmer@enron.com, Neil
Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Neil Hong/HOU/EES@EES, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Paula
Warren/HOU/EES@EES, Richard L Zdunkewicz/HOU/EES@EES, Richard
Leibert/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON, Rita
Hennessy/NA/Enron@ENRON, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, Rosalinda
Tijerina/HOU/EES@EES, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES,
Sharon Dick/HOU/EES@EES, skean@enron.com, Tanya Leslie/HOU/EES@EES, Tasha
Lair/HOU/EES@EES, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terri Greenlee/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tim
Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tony Spruiell/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES,
Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathryn Corbally/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jubran
Whalan/HOU/EES@EES, triley@enron.com, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert C
Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Greg Wolfe/HOU/ECT@ECT, James
Wright/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, Dirk vanUlden/Western
Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, Steve Walker/SFO/EES@EES, Jennifer
Rudolph/HOU/EES@EES, Martin Wenzel/SFO/HOU/EES@EES, Douglas
Condon/SFO/EES@EES, wgang@enron.com, Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>,
Hedy Govenar <hgovenar@govadv.com> @ ENRON, jklauber@llgm.com, Mike D
Smith/HOU/EES@EES, John Neslage/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Janel
Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Eric Letke/DUB/EES@EES
		 cc:
		 Subject: FYI_____ISO announces  Market Stabilization Proposal

----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/06/2001 08:06 PM -----

	"Katie Kaplan" <kaplan@iepa.com>
	03/06/2001 07:41 PM

		 To: "'Alex Sugaoka (E-mail)'" <alex.sugaoka@uaecorp.com>, "'Bill Carlson
(E-mail)'" <william_carlson@wastemanagement.com>, "'Bill Woods (E-mail)'"
<billw@calpine.com>, "'Bob Ellery (E-mail)'" <bellery@spi-ind.com>, "'Bob
Escalante (E-mail)'" <rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Bob Gates (E-mail)'"
<bob.gates@enron.com>, "'Carolyn A Baker (E-mail)'"
<cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "'Cody Carter (E-mail)'"
<cody.carter@williams.com>, "'Curt Hatton (E-mail)'"
<Curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com>, "'Curtis Kebler (E-mail)'"
<curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "'David Parquet'"
<david.parquet@enron.com>, "'Dean Gosselin (E-mail)'"
<dean_gosselin@fpl.com>, "'Doug Fernley (E-mail)'"
<fernley.doug@epenergy.com>, "'Douglas Kerner (E-mail)'" <dkk@eslawfirm.com>,
"'Duane Nelsen (E-mail)'" <dnelsen@gwfpower.com>, "'Ed Tomeo (E-mail)'"
<ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>, "'Eileen Koch (E-mail)'" <eileenk@calpine.com>,
"'Eric Eisenman (E-mail)'" <eric.eisenman@gen.pge.com>, "'Frank DeRosa
(E-mail)'" <frank.derosa@gen.pge.com>, "Frazier Blaylock (E-mail)"
<frazier_blaylock@ogden-energy.com>, "'Greg Blue (E-mail)'"
<gtbl@dynegy.com>, "'Hap Boyd (E-mail)'" <Hap_Boyd@enron.com>, "'Hawks Jack
(E-mail)'" <jack.hawks@gen.pge.com>, "'Jack Pigott (E-mail)'"
<jackp@calpine.com>, "'Jim Willey (E-mail)'" <elliottsa@earthlink.net>, "'Joe
Greco (E-mail)'" <jgreco@caithnessenergy.com>, "'Joe Ronan (E-mail)'"
<joer@calpine.com>, "'John Stout (E-mail)'" <john_h_stout@reliantenergy.com>,
"'Jonathan Weisgall (E-mail)'" <jweisgall@aol.com>, "'Kate Castillo
(E-mail)'" <CCastillo@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Kelly Lloyd (E-mail)'"
<kellyl@enxco.com>, "'Ken Hoffman (E-mail)'" <khoffman@caithnessenergy.com>,
"'Kent Fickett (E-mail)'" <kfickett@usgen.com>, "'Kent Palmerton'"
<kent.palmerton@williams.com>, "'Lynn Lednicky (E-mail)'"
<lynn.a.lednicky@dynegy.com>, "'Marty McFadden (E-mail)'"
<marty_mcfadden@ogden-energy.com>, "'Paula Soos'"
<paula_soos@ogden-energy.com>, "'Randy Hickok (E-mail)'"
<rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, "Rick S. Koebbe (E-mail)"
<rskoebbe@powerworksinc.com>, "'Rob Lamkin (E-mail)'"
<rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, "'Roger Pelote (E-mail)'"
<roger.pelote@williams.com>, "'Ross Ain (E-mail)'" <ain@worldnet.att.net>,
"'Stephanie Newell (E-mail)'" <stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "'Steve
Iliff'" <siliff@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Steve Ponder (E-mail)'"
<steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "'Susan J Mara (E-mail)'" <smara@enron.com>, "'Tony
Wetzel (E-mail)'" <twetzel@thermoecotek.com>, "'William Hall (E-mail)'"
<wfhall2@duke-energy.com>, "'Alex Makler (E-mail)'" <alexm@calpine.com>, "Bob
Szymanski (E-mail)" <rjszymanski@powerworksinc.com>, "'D. Frank (E-mail)'"
<dfrank@seawestwindpower.com>, "'David Dickey (E-mail)'"
<david.dickey@calenergy.com>, "'Doug Levitt (E-mail)'" <SDL@calwind.com>,
"'Ed Maddox (E-mail)'" <emaddox@seawestwindpower.com>, "'Eric Edstrom'"
<edstrome@epenergy.com>, "'Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)'"
<Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>, "'Julie Simon (E-mail)'" <jsimon@epsa.org>,
"'Lucian Fox (E-mail)'" <lucian_fox@ogden-energy.com>, "'Mark J. Smith'"
<mark_J_smith@fpl.com>, "'Milton Schultz (E-mail)'" <bfpjv@c-zone.net>, "'Nam
Nguyen'" <nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>, "'Paul Wood (E-mail)'"
<paul_wood@ogden-energy.com>, "'Pete Levitt (E-mail)'" <Pete@calwind.com>,
"'Rich Dyer (E-mail)'" <rich_dyer@ogden-energy.com>, "'Robert Frees
(E-mail)'" <freesrj@apci.com>, "'Scott Harlan'" <harlans@epenergy.com>, "'Ted
Cortopassi (E-mail)'" <ted_cortopassi@ogden-energy.com>, "'Thomas Heller
(E-mail)'" <hellertj@apci.com>, "'Tom Hartman'" <tom_hartman@fpl.com>, "'Ward
Scobee (E-mail)'" <wscobee@caithnessenergy.com>
		 cc: "Jan Smutny-Jones (E-mail)" <smutny@iepa.com>, "Steven Kelly (E-mail)"
<steven@iepa.com>, "Carol H Hudson (E-mail)" <Chudson@iepa.com>, "'Andy Brown
(E-mail)'" <ABB@eslawfirm.com>, "'B Brown Andy (E-mail)'"
<andybrwn@earthlink.net>, "'Bob Weisenmiller (E-mail)'" <rbw@mrwassoc.com>,
"'Jean Munoz (E-mail)'" <jmunoz@mcnallytemple.com>, "'John Larrea (E-mail)'"
<john.g.larrea@williams.com>, "'Julee Malinowski-Ball (E-mail)'"
<jmball@ns.net>, "'Kassandra Gough (E-mail)'" <kgough@calpine.com>, "'Katie
Kaplan (E-mail)'" <kaplan@iepa.com>, "'Kristin Vellandi (E-mail)'"
<kvellandi@pstrategies.com>, "'Lynn Lednicky (E-mail)'" <lale@dynegy.com>,
"Marie Moretti (E-mail 2)" <mmoretti@mccabeandcompany.net>, "'Marty Wilson
(E-mail)'" <mwilson@pstrategies.com>, "'McNally Ray (E-mail)'"
<rmcnally@mcnallytemple.com>, "'Norton Kelli (E-mail)'"
<knorton@mcnallytemple.com>, "'Paula Hall-Collins (E-mail)'"
<paula.hall-collins@williams.com>, "'Richard Hyde (E-mail)'"
<rwhyde@duke-energy.com>, "'Theo Pahos (E-mail)'" <tpahos@ppallc.com>, "'Tom
Ross (E-mail)'" <tross@mcnallytemple.com>
		 Subject: FYI_____ISO announces  Market Stabilization Proposal

Greetings:
The ISO will be holding a conference call to discuss a Market Stabilization
Plan on Friday at 10:00 a.m. PST. They will be releasing the plan tomorrow
by COB (midnight) and IEP will review it ASAP.  We will also participate in
the Conference Call on Friday and let everyone know what is going on.  We'll
keep you posted....

Katie Kaplan
Manager of State Policy Affairs
Independent Energy Producers Association
(916) 448-9499

-----Original Message-----
From: Woertz, Byron [mailto:BWoertz@caiso.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 4:43 PM
To: ISO Market Participants
Subject: CAISO Notice - Market Stabilization Proposal - Conference Call

                ISO Market Participants:
                The ISO has developed a market stabilization plan, designed
to stabilize operations and control costs in California, to be implemented
in the next two months.  It would remain in place for the near term (through
Summer, 2001 and beyond) and includes changes to existing ISO practices as
well as an expansion of the ISO's responsibilities.  Because of the need to
move quickly so that the plan can be implemented by this summer, we will be
unable to hold a full stakeholder review process.  But, we do want to
discuss the plan with you so that you can understand the proposal and the
reasoning behind it.
                The ISO will post this plan on the ISO web site at
http://www.caiso.com/stakeholders/ <http://www.caiso.com/stakeholders/> , by
COB tomorrow.  In addition, we will host a conference call from 10:00 a.m.
to 2:00 p.m. PST this Friday, March 9, to discuss the plan with you and
clarify any outstanding issues.  We then plan to request the Board's
approval for this plan on March 15th in order to be able to implement the
plan by summer.
                The call in information is as follows:
                Market Stabilization Conference Call
                Friday, March 9, 10:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m. PST
                Call-In Number:         877-381-6005
                Conference ID #:        760357
                Leader Name:    Byron Woertz
                Following the call, you may submit any comments on the plan
to us by close of business on Tuesday, March 13.  You may send your comments
to bwoertz@caiso.com.  We will do our best to summarize your comments and
present them to the Board at their March 15 meeting. In addition, there will
be a public comment period on the 15th.
                Please contact me if you have any further questions.
                Byron B. Woertz, Jr.
                Director, Client Relations
                (916) 608-7066


Oh, joy.  Get out the mattresses.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kaufman, Paul
Sent:	Thursday, October 11, 2001 5:02 PM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	RE:

Yes.  We hold a very big position with NPC that rolls off at the end of '02.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Thursday, October 11, 2001 3:01 PM
To:	Kaufman, Paul
Subject:	RE:

We have any contract in the cross (short?) hairs?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kaufman, Paul
Sent:	Thursday, October 11, 2001 5:00 PM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	RE:

a.o.k.  Everything's fine.  Thanks for catching me up on the actions of those commies over in Nevada.  For a Republican stronghold, they act suspiciously like Democrats.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Thursday, October 11, 2001 2:45 PM
To:	Kaufman, Paul
Subject:

On a more serious note (notes).  Sue's out sick today (caught something in Houston, it seems). And seriously, I hope the meeting went well.


Elizabeth Mullen
eamullen@facstaff.wisc.edu

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Elizabeth Mullen


FYI.  Here is an update from the EES meeting this morning with action items.

Jim

----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 03/01/2001 10:46 AM -----

	David W Delainey@EES
	03/01/2001 10:37 AM

		 To: Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES,
Janet R Dietrich/HOU/EES@EES, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeremy
Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES
		 cc:
		 Subject: California Action Items

Guys, a quick follow up on action items:
 CALIFORNIA:
 a) UC/CSU - send notice of default to them to start the clock ticking on the
mediation and arbitration this will also give us time to complete the
remaining transfer of the existing accounts on SCE - MS/VS - ASAP;
 b) '02 California positions - need update from regulatory giving us a view
of the following:
    - possible market structure (ie) probability of direct access or forced
direct access for our customers where we would be required to deliver market
priced power to fulfull our requirements in a post AB 1890 world?; - JS - ASAP
    - if it is likely that these customers will be left on tariff because of
a lack of direct access or that we can elect to leave them on a tariff what
are the likely tariff structures ( and their components) to replace AB
1890?;  - JS - ASAP
    - given above what are the likely tariff increases expected; - JS - ASAP
     - and what are we currently doing to perfect our lien (regulatory) and
ultimately legally on the collection of the negative CTC from the utilities -
JS/VS - next week.
 Ultimately, we want to make a call on what we do with these MWhrs early next
week.
 c) position reports - need a full WSCC energy, scalar, capacity,
physical/financial, "index", load shape exposures etc position reports on a
go forward basis - JD/DB - ASAP
 d) "pass through" risk - due diligence on the basis and other risks
associated with these index or pass through deals; - JD/DB - next week
 e) risk matrix - document percieved risk/return matrix (market, regulatory,
credit, etc) for continuing to deliver fixed price physical or financial
power commodity products through bundled & commodity deals or blend and
extend for existing D-DASRed PGE and SCE customers. This will provide us the
pricing, structure and profitability parameters necessary to continue to take
certain defined risk - SG/DB - next week.
 f) deal pipeline - full listing of volumes, possible pricing structure and
timing for future bundled, commodity and "blend and extends for D-DASRed
customers" in the deal pipeline for California - JB/SG/MS for Melvin and
others - ASAP

 NEW YORK:
 a) position reports - need a full NYC energy, scalar, capacity,
physical/financial, "index", load shape exposures etc position reports on a
go forward basis - JD/DB - ASAP;
 b) regulatory and political framework - comprehensive review of issues,
challenges et al in the emerging crisis debate in NYC - JS - next week;
 c) risk matrix - document percieved risk/return matrix (market, regulatory,
credit, etc) for continuing to deliver fixed price physical or financial
power commodity products through bundled & commodity deals for NY customers.
This will provide us the pricing, structure and profitability parameters
necessary to continue to take certain defined risk - SG/DB - next week;
 d) deal pipeline - full listing of volumes, possible pricing structure and
timing for future bundled and  commodity deals in the deal pipeline for NY -
JB/SG/MS for Melvin and others - ASAP

 FLORIDA:
 a)position reports - need a full Florida energy, scalar, capacity,
physical/financial, "index", load shape exposures etc position reports on a
go forward basis - JD/DB - ASAP;
 b) deal pipeline - full listing of volumes, possible pricing structure and
timing for future bundled and  commodity deals in the deal pipeline for
Florida - JB/SG/MS for Melvin and others - ASAP.

Regards
Delainey


[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE] 	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE] 	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE] 	[IMAGE] 	[IMAGE]
		[IMAGE]
		[IMAGE]

If you do not wish to receive future newsletters, please send us an e-mail at style@response.etracks.com  with
"REMOVE jsteffe@enron.com" in the subject line. [IMAGE]


...we'll probably bitch about Wheeler Ridge....not sure if we'll 69 the
CSA....

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 2:58 PM
To: Cherry, Brian
Subject: Re: FW: I9907003 Ruling re Notice of a Full Panel Hearing

yep.


I guess it looks OK to me.  I'm surprised that they will have the ability to
identify their own company as a counterparty.  Don't we limit the companies
they can designate to those already signed up to trade on EnronOnline?

	David Forster@ENRON
	03/15/2001 08:19 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: New Message

Mark,

There is a new message to add to the set you previously reviewed, covering
the case where a broker tries to transact when identifying their own company
as the counterparty:

Failure Reason: Cannot Complete Transaction to Broker Company
Text Body: The requested Transaction has not completed as the Counterparty
identified for the transaction attempt is your own company.  For further
information or to request a change in status, please contact us.

I have passed this text along for incorporation (we have very tight timelines
as we are hoping to go live tomorrow night).

If you have any significant concerns about the above, let me know so we can
change it.

Thanks,

Dave