Fyi
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)

-----Original Message-----
From: Beck, Sally <Sally.Beck@ENRON.com>
To: Kean, Steven J. <steve.kean@enron.com>
Sent: Fri Oct 05 18:16:31 2001
Subject: RE: Enron Net Works 2002 Budget Process

In a word - no.  ENW budgets have already been submitted to Corp as well.  There are allocations from ENW to Corp for IT Infrastructure (primarily headcount driven) and IT Maintenance and Development, and I will be reviewing these with Rick Causey.  The largest portion of our ENW costs are allocated to EA, EGM, EIM, and EES.  It is these business units primarily with whom we are meeting to share the level of detail discussed in my memo.   These business units already have in hand an allocation billing for 2002 from ENW.  Our meetings at a greater level of detail may result in some changes to the ENW budget, as business units understand more detail around the cost structures for supporting certain lines of business and certain IT development costs.  When I explained our budgeting process to Rick Causey, he had suggested that I share that with everyone on the Management Committee.  Some members are more directly impacted the the ENW budget than others.  --Sally
	 -----Original Message-----
	From: 	Kean, Steven J.
	Sent:	Friday, October  5, 2001 5:06 PM
	To:	Beck, Sally
	Subject:	RE: Enron Net Works 2002 Budget Process

	We have already submitted our budget for PR, Govt' affairs, Facilities, corp HR etc.  Does the process below affect my numbers (please say no).

		 -----Original Message-----
		From: 	Beck, Sally
		Sent:	Friday, October 05, 2001 3:03 PM
		To:	Bowen Jr., Raymond; Brown, Michael - COO London; Buy, Rick; Causey, Richard; Delainey, David; Derrick Jr., James; Dietrich, Janet; Fallon, Jim; Fastow, Andrew; Frevert, Mark; Glisan, Ben; Haedicke, Mark E.; Horton, Stanley; Hughes, James A.; Kean, Steven J.; Kitchen, Louise; Koenig, Mark; Lavorato, John; Lay, Kenneth; Mcconnell, Mike; McMahon, Jeffrey; Shankman, Jeffrey A.; Sherriff, John; Whalley, Greg
		Cc:	Colwell, Wes; Roper, Kerry; Price, Brent A.; Castleman, Kent; Dyson, Fernley; Hayslett, Rod; Piper, Greg; Pickering, Mark
		Subject:	Enron Net Works 2002 Budget Process

		The 2002 Enron Net Works budget will for the first time combine allocations to business units for four key services:  Enron Online, IT Infrastructure, Risk Management Operations and IT Maintenance and Development.  We are providing a level of detail for expense and capital spend that is greater than that provided in past years, and that will allow business units to make informed choices regarding the services that they receive.

		We are meeting with individual business unit Offices of the Chair to review in detail the four service areas delivered through Enron Net Works.  Some of these meetings have been completed and more will occur between now and October 12.  Please keep the following points in mind as we work with you to finalize budget:

*	Enron Networks today is very different from this time last year.  Additions to the 2002 ENW budget are Operations for EA, EIM and EGM.  Operations, IT Maintenance and Development, and IT Infrastructure for EES and EBS have been included under the ENW umbrella for the first time in the  2002  budget as well.  The 2001 budgets for these functions were approved and included in individual business units last year.   Any comparison of ENW's 2002 versus 2001 budget must be appropriately adjusted for these organizational changes to be relevant.

*	For further detail for each business unit, ENW's 2002 expense and capital dollars are organized to mirror each business unit's lines of business (products or commodities) in order to create a transparent view at a more granular level of the costs involved in supporting each of the lines of business.

*	The detail that is being provided to business units for IT costs delineates licensing fees, system maintenance costs and new development costs.  Detail on each IT development project identifies the purpose, business sponsor, line of business, "in progress" or "planned" designation, expense and capital spend, system impacted, and estimated completion date.   In order to finalize IT project budgets, decisions will be required from the business units on which projects to undertake in 2002.

		If you have questions about the ENW budgets as we are working with you to finalize them,  please call one of us.

		Greg Piper
		Sally Beck
		Mark Pickering


OK for me.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sever, Stephanie
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 4:39 PM
To:	Jones, Tana; Global Emerging Businesses
Cc:	Moran, Tom; Lebrocq, Wendi
Subject:	FW: Product Type Approval Needed (US PlasticHDPE Fin Swap)

The product long description below will fall under the new product types:

	US PlasticHDPE Fin Swap

Credit (Tom Moran/Wendi Lebrocq) have approved copying the profiles for the new product type from the following:

	US Plastic LLDPE Fin Swap.

Please respond no later than 10am, Wednesday, October 23.

Thank you.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Moran, Tom
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 4:21 PM
To:	Sever, Stephanie; Lebrocq, Wendi
Subject:	RE: Product Type Approval Needed (US PlasticHDPE Fin Swap)

Agreed.  Thanks Stephanie.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sever, Stephanie
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 4:19 PM
To:	Moran, Tom; Lebrocq, Wendi
Subject:	FW: Product Type Approval Needed (US PlasticHDPE Fin Swap)

Tom/Wendi,

What do you think about copying the profiles from the Product Type - US Plastic LLDPE Fin Swap?

Thanks,
Stephanie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Walker, Chris
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 3:46 PM
To:	Blumenthal, Jeff; Musch, Susan; Hagelmann, Bjorn; Taylor, Mark E (Legal); Moran, Tom; Paddack, Donald
Cc:	Anderson, Diane; Lees, Lisa; Sever, Stephanie; Clark, Claudia; O'day, Karen; Guillory, Michael; Jones, Tana; Lambert, Karen; Lombardi, Kelly; Sweitzer, Tara; Kenne, Dawn C.; Moorer, Torrey; Meredith, Kevin; Lozano, Melba
Subject:	Product Type Approval Needed (US PlasticHDPE Fin Swap)

Your review and approval of the following product type in the EOL Data manager is needed (for directions on approval, please see steps for approval at the bottom of this e-mail).

US PlasticHDPE Fin Swap

US HDPE IM Swap    CMAI                    Nov01-Apr02     c/LB

A US Plastics financial Swap Transaction with Enron North America Corp. for high density polyethylene, injection molding grade under which the Seller pays a Floating Price and the Buyer pays the price submitted by the  Counterparty on the Website (the Fixed Price) in each case in respect of the Notional Quantity per Determination Period.  Each calendar month during the term of the Transaction will be a Determination Period. The Notional Quantity per Determination Period shall be the volume submitted by the Counterparty via the Website. The Payment Date(s) will be 5 business days after the Floating Price is determinable. The Floating Price shall be the Index for the relevant Determination Period.
The term of the Transaction shall correspond to the date(s) set forth in the Product description on the Website.
The Index for a month shall be the arithmetic average of the high and low Cents/Pound prices of High Density Polyethylene - Injection Molding grade published under the headings "Global Plastics & Polymers Report: Month Ending Prices (DATE) North America : High Density PE Injection Molding" in the month-end issue of Chemical Market Associates, Inc.'s Global Plastics & Polymers Market Report effective for such month.
The price is quoted in cents (US) per unit of measure which will be the Contractual Currency.
The unit of measure against which the price is quoted shall be pounds.

 << File: ENA Fin GTC.doc >>
STEPS FOR APPROVAL:

click the 	START button
select 	PROGRAMS
select 	TEST APPLICATIONS
select	ENRONONLINE CLUSTER(PROD)
	PROCEED WITH USUAL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click the	Enron Online Production Cluster "START" button
select	EnronOnLine (this is the EOL Datamanager)
	PROCEED WITH EOL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click on the "+" for EnronOnLine
click on the "+" for Product Types
click on the "+" for "Awaiting Approval" (OR  "Partially Approved")
select the product requiring review as stated in e-mail above
Right "mouse" click on "properties" to view product set-up
TO APPROVE:  Right mouse click on "Approved"

CW
3-7533


How do your calendars look June 7-15 for meeting with the guys from OLNG? They are interested in a visit to CMS. Possibly they could be there for the Hoegh Galleon unloading.

Please let me know your date preferences and the names of anyone else that should attend the meetings.

Paul


On Wednesday afternoon we have another legal/credit seminar planned.  So for
me Thursday would be better.

	Carol St Clair@ECT
	04/05/2001 04:30 PM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron, Anne C Koehler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cheryl
Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron, Francisco Pinto
Leite/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Frank
Sayre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samantha
Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Greenberg/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Offsite

We would like to hold a 1/2 day offsite either on Wednesday, May 23 or
Thursday, May 24.  Please let me know what your preference would be.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


PJM sent a bill for the 2002 Annual Fee (for $5000).

Upon paying the fee, EPMI will be able to access E-Schedules.

PJM is looking for payment on December 20, 2001 along with our November grid payment.

I assume that no Enron company will need the E-Schedule system after January 1 and therefore we will not be making this payment?

Please advise.

Jim


thanks

   Kate Symes                12/19/2000 04:23 PM

To: Stephanie Piwetz/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: deal 482760.01

Bloomberg was mistaken on this one. They'll be sending out a new confirm soon.

Thanks,
Kate

Stephanie Piwetz   12/19/2000 02:19 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: deal 482760.01

Kate,
trade of Tom Alonso
we have term in system as 12/21/00-12/31/00 mon-sat
Bloomberg shows 12/26/00-12/30-00  mon-sat

please check and let me know
Stephanie


FYI, this is from Bob Murphy at ARC.

JNG

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	LynnDixie51@aol.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-LynnDixie51+40aol+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Monday, July 02, 2001 12:31 PM
To:	jgoodpa@enron.com
Subject:	Arctic Resources Company

Dear John:  Bob asked that I forward the attached press release to you.  Happy 4th!  Lynn Murphy

 - ARC Press Release 062501.doc


With Chris Gaskill and Hunter


It may be time for a drink!!

Susan

From: Stacy E Dickson on 10/04/2000 04:33 PM
To: Susan W Pereira/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Bazor Contract Confirmation

No problem.  What will we do when this thing is finally signed?


THANK YOU.


nope ny

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 11:17 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:

did you book my flight to pakistan?  i am thinking that i need to be leaving soon.  like tomorrow.


Tori,

	I just wanted to let you know that we haven't forgotten about you.  Kim Alexander who has really been the authority on the pricing information was involved in an auto accident this previous Sunday.  He'll be returning to work next Wednesday and would be able to complete this much faster than anyone else trying to pick it up.

I'll keep you informed next week as to how it goes.

Thanks for your patience,

Dave

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kuykendall, Tori
Sent:	Thursday, September 27, 2001 2:17 PM
To:	Dronet, David
Cc:	Tonks, Colin
Subject:	FW: West pricing information

I sent this message to colin originally and, since he's out, I am forwarding it to you.  I'm not really sure who the appropriate person is.  I also just realized that I forgot to
include the attachment on the original message - oops.  Anyway, could you take a look at this sheet and let me know what you could come up with?
I'd like to build something that looks like the "price sheet" tab. Thanks.

 << File: DailyPrices.xls >>
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kuykendall, Tori
Sent:	Thursday, September 27, 2001 2:10 PM
To:	Tonks, Colin
Subject:	West pricing information

This is a spreadsheet that we used to have in our fundies packet a while back.  It is no longer being maintained, but I was wondering if you could cook something up that looks similar to it -- linking to the fundies price database.  Let me know.  Thanks.


Please read the e-mails below.  I don't have any problem handling this the
way Tim has suggested, but since you've been working on the storage balance
issues, I thought I'd ask you if there's any reason you can see not to do it
this way.  Please advise.....

---------------------- Forwarded by Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT on 09/12/2000
08:53 AM ---------------------------

Timothy L Ray@EES
09/08/2000 12:26 PM
To: dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com @ ENRON
cc: jporte1@ceg.com, Michael H Garred/HOU/EES@EES, Dave Scott/HOU/EES@EES,
Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Post-Close Storage Settlement

Doug;

I really don't want to go down the road of putting together any more side
letter agreements.  They are too time consuming.  I really feel that we
should have no problem forwarding to you our electronic communications with
ENA confirming the storage volume.  You can use this as a basis to complete
your billing reconciliations.  I will promise to forward to you all of the
volume confirmations that we have with ENA for July 31 injections.

Colleen;
I don't have your view.  If you want to do a side letter, as was completed
for the hedges, let us know.  However, if you all don't feel strongly about
this, then I am inclined to carry on as I described above.

dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com on 09/08/2000 08:57:32 AM
To: " - *tray@enron.com" <tray@enron.com>
cc: " - *Snyder, Dan" <dsnyde1@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Porter,
Jeffrey" <jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com>
Subject: Post-Close Storage Settlement

Tim--With regard to the Post-Close Storage Settlement between NPC and CES, the
situation is that we are waiting on final, correct invoices from ENA showing
the volumes injected for the 4 theoretical storages (TCO, Transco WSS, Transco
ESS, and Sonat CSS).   We would also like ENA to agree in some written format
as to the July 31 volumes in each of these storages, where these volumes
reflect the April 1 starting inventory that was left over from last winter.
If
these final numbers from ENA agree with the values that Jeff Porter put in the
latest version of the storage exhibit to the purchase agreement, that is
fine.   To the extent that ENA has invoiced CES for a different amount(s), CES
will resolve those differences with ENA.  (We know that there are some
differences, as shown in the attached spreadsheet.)

I have asked Chris Germany at ENA to work with us to get this resolved, and he
has agreed to do so.  However, it might help expedite things if you can weigh
in with Chris or with Colleen Sullivan as well.   Please let me know if you
have questions, etc.  I am going to be out of the office for at least the next
few days, but I will be checking my e-mail and voice messages periodically.

Thanks.

Doug Kinney
Ph:  703-561-6339
Fax:  703-561-7317

 - Post Close Stg settle.xls


I am interested in finding out who is attending the California session that
you are speaking at.  If enough customers are going it might make sense to
send someone from middle market to help cover those guys.  Do you think that
is wise?  I am aware that City of Riverside is sending someone.

Stewart


Hi Brent, I have been in contact with Dale Neuner regarding the creation of
the Product Types for Argentina, by now he has all the necessary information.
We will need your approval on the wording that was suggested for the long
description and other legal sign-off. I have already gone through the product
descriptions with Andrea and no mayor comments came up. Regarding Natural Gas
products, her comments were that we are creating a Firm product with TOP
100%, but that is OK. Then on the additional information like delivery
points, term, currency and unit of measure, all those alternatives have been
given to Dale for him to load into the system.
Please give me an update on your timetable for these issues.
Regards

Patrick


Here are the numbers for the Accounting group.


Ed,

Although this email was directed to EI lawyers, I was under the impression
that this was a Corp policy.  Maybe I was wrong.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 07/27/2000 11:55
AM ---------------------------

Dianne Langeland
09/29/1999 01:41 PM
To: Denise Almoina/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Yao
Apasu/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cheryl
Arguijo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Lillian
Bailey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, David K
Bargainer/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michelle
Blaine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Martha
Braddy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sarah
MacDonald/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kathleen
Carnahan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Connie
Castillo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Julia H
Chin/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Wade Cline, Jan
Cooley/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Nancy
Corbet/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ned E
Crady/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Luis
Derrota/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Scott
Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Margaret
Doucette/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Katherine
Ehrmentraut/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Edwin
Essandoh/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joanne
Garner/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rosalinda V
Gonzalez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Amador
Granado/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sheila
Graves/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sam
Guerrero/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Lauren Hagerty, Karen L
Harrison/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Karen
Hedley/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sheila
Hester/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Debra
Hicks/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michelle
Hicks/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kelly Noel
Higgason/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robin
Hill/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Wendi
Hoelscher/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Janice
Hollaway/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Suzanne A
Kelly/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, William
Krenz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Laurie
Lee/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Maxine E
Levingston/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Annette
Lopez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Bruce
Lundstrom/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kay
Mann/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Liz N
Martinez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mary G
Martinez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, MaryHelen
Martinez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Darlene
McKeever/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Veronica
Montiel/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Nancy
Muchmore/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Bonnie
Nelson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Paulette
Obrecht/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Shirley
Oliver/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Larry
Pardue/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Diana
Parker/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jana L
Paxton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Martin W
Penkwitz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Carmen
Perez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Francisco Pinto
Leite/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Andrew
Ralston/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Daniel R
Rogers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Deborah
Rogers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, David L
Roland/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Carlos
Ryerson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Frank
Sayre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Tami
Scrudder/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Hong
Shen/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Louis
Sherrod/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Lupita
Velasquez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
Viverito/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Debbie
Wallace/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michael
Warner/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Candy
Willard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robert C
Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Gerry
Willis/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Priscilla
Zavala/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Consulting/Service Agreements

The following is just a reiteration of the Legal Department's procedure for
handling Consulting and/or Service Agreements.  Attached are the current
authorized approval forms for these types of agreements.

All executed consulting/service agreements should be sent to my attention in
Contract Compliance & Administration Department for input into the Legal
Database, filing and archiving.  Please direct any comments or questions
regarding this procedure to me.  I am located at 3AC-1989 and my extension is
6-7213.

The policy for handling consultant agreements and fee payments is as follows:

 (1) The Consulting Agreement must have prior approval as indicated by the
attached Consultant Approval Form before execution by the parties.
  (Agreements which were entered into prior to August 8, 1999, required Joe
Sutton's approval rather than the Regional CEO.)

 (2) The fully executed agreement along with the approval form is then sent
to Contract Compliance & Administration in the Legal Department to
                                my attention for inputting into the Legal
Database.

 (3) Typically,  the consultant fees are not paid until the above has been
accomplished.

The policy for handling service contracts and fee payments is essentially the
same.

 (1) The Service Contract must have prior approval as indicated by the
attached Service Contract Approval Form before execution by the parties.
  (Agreements which were entered into prior to August 8, 1999 required Joe
Sutton's approval rather than the Regional CEO.)

 (2) The fully executed agreement along with the approval is then sent to
Contract Compliance & Administration in the Legal Department (now to my
attention) for inputting into the Legal Database.

 (3) As with Consulting Agreement, typically,  the service contract fees are
not paid until the above has been accomplished.

When we receive the fully executed agreement, along with fully executed
approval form, we will enter into the Legal Database.  We are unable to do so
without these documents.

If you have any questions regarding the above, please do not hesitate to call
me.

Thanks,

Dianne
x6-7213


Thanks for the invite but we already have plans for the game.   Hope you have
a good time and Nebraska wins!


A new change control has been added...

Mar. 22
From 5:00 - 7:00 p.m., the EDI team will migrate the ECNET server from the 172.28.176.249 network.  This migration will cause a total outage for the ECNET server.  Applications accessing this device via IP address will need to be changed to reflect the new IP which is 172.16.2.22.  The EDINET server at 172.28.176.21 will also be migrated the week of Apr. 6.  More information regarding that change will be available next week.

ETS Solution Center - Houston, at 713-345-4745
ETS Solution Center - Omaha, at 402-398-7454


TASK ASSIGNMENT

Task Priority:		1
Task Due On:		11/7/2000
Task Start Date:	11/7/2000


Here's the latest from our good buddy Ryan......

---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 04/02/2001 03:39 PM
---------------------------

Ryan Langan <ryan.langan@ripcity.com> on 04/02/2001 03:29:17 PM
To: "'kate.symes@enron.com'" <kate.symes@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Limited Blazer Playoff Tickets! (corrected)

Sorry Kate...let me try that again,

> Just wanted to let you know that I have a small allotment of playoff
> tickets that will be available for your employees to purchase. There is a
> strong possibility of facing either the Lakers or Jazz in the first round
> so tickets will sell fast once made available to the general public.
> Playoffs begin between April 20th - 25th (exact date is to be determined).
> Please call or e-mail with any questions.
>
> Attention All Enron Employees!
> The NBA Playoffs Are Here...Purchase Your Tickets In Advance Now!
>
>
> V.I.P. Preferred Seating (lower level sideline) - $115 or $125
> *See gray sections on arena map...Amenities include:  Exclusive access to
> Legends & Players restaurant/lounge, theater style seating and in-seat
> wait service.
>
> Fuchsia Section (lower level corner) - $112.00
>
> Blue Section (lower level endzone)  - $76.00
>
> Purple section (upper level center) - $24.00
>
> Tan section (upper level behind basket) - $11.00
>
>
>  *BONUS* - In addition to bypassing the TicketMaster service fees, each
> ticket comes with worth of $3 Blazer Bucks (good for food, beverages and
> merchandise in the Rose Garden.)
>
>
>  To see a map with the colored sections go to http://www.blazers.com and
>  click on arena and tickets...
>
>
>  For tickets please call Ryan Langan @ 503-797-9936 or e-mail:
> ryan.langan@ripcity.com
>
>


You can take my assistant Taffy Milligan off these emails again.  Thanks!

	Adnan Patel@ENRON
	11/29/2000 04:49 PM

		 To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT,
David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia
Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron Europe Global
Contracts and Facilities@ECT, Enron Europe Global CounterParty@ECT, Stephanie
Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bradley Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey
Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT,
William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juana
Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Lee Munden/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim
Davies/LON/ECT@ECT, Karen O'Day/NA/Enron@Enron, Taffy Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: EOL Credit - GCP Responses 11/29/00

Attached are the GCP Signoffs on EOL Approvals for 11/29/00 with GCP
responses marked in Red.

Adnan Patel

Bradley Diebner@ECT
11/29/2000 04:31 PM
To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie
R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Cynthia Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron Europe
Global Contracts and Facilities, Enron Europe Global CounterParty, Stephanie
Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bradley Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey
Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adnan Patel/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa
Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juana Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Lee
Munden/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT, Karen O'Day/NA/Enron@Enron, Taffy
Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: EOL Credit Responses 11/29/00

Regards,
bd


I think we should get either you or Sara involved in this.  Gary has
requested a Houston lawyer help in establishing the business in London.  Mark
----- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 06/30/2000 09:37 AM -----

	Paul Simons
	06/27/2000 07:23 AM

		 To: Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Andrew Cornfield/LON/ECT@ECT, John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, (bcc: Mark E
Haedicke/HOU/ECT)
		 Subject: Bond and Equity Trading in Europe

Gary

There follows a summary of the key information required in order to be able
to estimate, under SFA capital rules, the likely regulatory capital
requirements of the proposed bond and equity trading businesses in London.
The summary has been prepared by Andy Cornfield who is our resident expert on
the SFA's capital rules.

As previously discussed, EEFT - our SFA regulated agent through which we
currently propose to run this business - is subject only to very modest
regulatory capital rules since it does not take any principal positions.  Our
view, however, is that a bond and equity trading desk of the type discussed
will (sooner or later) become subject to SFA capital requirements and so it
makes sense now to estimate the likely extent of that capital.

It would be very helpful at this stage if you (or someone in your group)
could provide a guestimate (based on the US model, but modified where you
think the European positions might be different) of the likely volumes and
constituent parts of these businesses:

after 12 months of trading
after 24 months of trading
after 36 months of trading

Please contact Andy or myself if you would like to discuss this. I look
forward to hearing from you.

Best regards

Paul

---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Simons/LON/ECT on 27/06/2000 11:22
---------------------------

Andrew Cornfield
23/06/2000 14:20

To: Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Info for Gary Hickerson

Paul

As requested. Please call to discuss.

Regards
Andy


NYMEX Membership Services
May 9, 2001
Notice # MS-35

NOTICE OF INTENTION TO SWITCH QUALIFYING CLEARING MEMBER

 Please be advised that effective with the close of business, May 9, 2001,
Pioneer Futures, Inc., will no longer guarantee the following member(s):

Ron Benaharon (WAVE-3549)

 However, the above mentioned will remain a member guaranteed by MBF Clearing
Corp.  In connection therewith, notification of any claims against the
aforementioned individuals arising out of transactions executed on the
Exchange up to the close of business May 9, 2001, must be submitted to the
Corporate Secretary,s Office within (10) ten days.

 Members and Member Firms have (10) days from the date of this notice to
advise the Corporate Secretary,s Office of any claims in accordance with Rule
2.51.

TERMINATION OF MEMBER FIRM PRIVILEGES

 Please be advised that effective with the close of business, May 8, 2001,
GPZ  Trading LLC., has voluntarily terminated its Member Firm privileges.

 Inquiries regarding the above should be directed to the Member Services
Department at (212) 299-2379.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=sara.shackleton@enron.com&
refdoc=(MS-35)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 05/12/2000
02:00 PM ---------------------------

"Jennifer Cutaia" <jcutaia@tupac.com> on 05/12/2000 12:47:27 PM
To: judy.hernandez@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Alex's resume

Try to send this to Steve at this e-mail address:
Salisha.Ramos@enron.com
Thanks!

------------------------------------------------------------
Tupac: the man, the legend...the free e-mail service.
Click here -------------------->  http://www.tupac.com

 - Alejandro R.doc


John:
Can we talk on Monday about how to deal with the LC language per my response
to your e-mail?

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


Your info is right - although I do hope that all is not dark.  Wouldn't have imagined this outcome two weeks ago.  But when Bob Hall removed his name from the Netco list, timing was critical in working with potential purchasers in the auction process.  There wasn't anyone else to step in, so I did so just to help coordinate the due diligence effort and the transition.  I spent many hours with the UBS operations team last week, and they are the ones who decided that they wanted me to take the role.  It was the time that I spent with the UBS team that changed my mind about considering the role.  My reporting relationship will be to the head of American operations in Stamford, CT.  I am quite impressed with him.  The further negative news here was a factor as well.  Should be interesting.  --Sally

-----Original Message-----
From: Pickering, Mark
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 2:54 PM
To: Beck, Sally
Subject: News

    I hear you've gone to the dark side :-)


Hello.  My location is 3210C.  Come by when you get a chance.

Thanks,
Mike


Firms Push Edison Near Bankruptcy

Energy: Power generators ask firm to spell out how they will be repaid hundreds of millions of dollars for purchases under deregulation plan.

By NANCY VOGEL and JERRY HIRSCH
TIMES STAFF WRITERS

September 29 2001

SACRAMENTO -- Five big energy companies owed hundreds of millions of dollars by Southern California Edison pushed the utility a step closer to bankruptcy Friday by asking Edison to sign an agreement spelling out how each will be repaid.

The companies demanded that Edison meet with them within two weeks to work out a repayment plan and implied that otherwise they would drag the Rosemead-based utility into Bankruptcy Court. Under federal law, any three creditors can force a company to file for bankruptcy if they are owed a combined $10,775. The five generating companies collectively are owed hundreds of millions of dollars, although the exact total is not known.

The letter was a significant step in maneuvering over Edison's fate--a dance that has gone on for months but now appears to be nearing its close. Edison has been reaching deals with some of its creditors, but has kept others waiting. Some power generators, in turn, have been threatening to push Edison into bankruptcy, although so far only Mirant Corp. and Reliant Energy have publicly embraced that idea. And Gov. Gray Davis and legislative leaders have continued to debate a plan that the governor believes could avoid a bankruptcy.

The letter, sent by William Bates III, a Palo Alto attorney representing the five power generators, expressed frustration that Edison so far has been unwilling to work out a repayment plan with large power producers. Under the Edison rescue plan that the Legislature debated and ultimately adjourned without passing earlier this month, Edison would have settled with its smaller creditors but been left with $1 billion in debt to big power sellers.

"This group of creditors is significant in both number and amount and deserves and requires to be dealt with as such," says the letter to Edison's private attorney, Thomas B. Walper of Munger, Tolles & Olson in Los Angeles.

"We would be willing to discuss any ideas SCE has" about an agreement to repay its debt, the letter continues, "but we don't want to waste anybody's time. Thus, as a first step we want to know whether SCE is interested in negotiating. . . . Please give us a simple 'yes' or 'no' answer to that question.

"Of course, we reserve all our rights and remedies in the event that SCE does not want to meet on these terms or we cannot reach a mutually satisfactory agreement," Bates wrote.

The five companies are Reliant, Mirant, Dynegy Corp., Enron Corp. and Puget Sound Energy, which is the biggest investor-owned utility in Washington state.

Edison officials refused to comment.

The frustration on the part of the power generators appeared to mount Tuesday, when Edison announced that it had reached an agreement to pay off its $14-million debt to the city of Long Beach, which sold Edison electricity produced at a trash-fueled power plant on Terminal Island.

Edison has also reached repayment plans with many small and renewable power producers who collectively are owed $1.2 billion.

"Edison can take steps to assure that all creditor classes are treated equally," said Richard Wheatley, a spokesman for Reliant Energy in Houston, which is owed $100 million to $200 million by Edison.

A spokesman for Atlanta-based Mirant, which is also owed more than $100 million, sounded a similar note. "It is time SCE made clear when, how much and even if it is going to pay us," Patrick Dorinson said.

So far, other creditors have balked at the idea of pushing Edison into bankruptcy, believing that a judge would probably consider a bankruptcy petition premature until after the Legislature meets Oct. 9 in a special session to deal exclusively with Edison's plight.

Davis, who insists that Edison should not be allowed to file for bankruptcy, ordered the new session earlier this month after legislators adjourned without passing any legislation that would shrink Edison's debt.

Other Creditors Take Notice

Senate leader John Burton, (D-San Francisco), has said that any such bill would have to guarantee that the burden of paying off the utility's $3.9-billion debt does not fall on homeowners and small-business owners.

The letter from the five generators caught the attention of other creditors who have so far played along with SCE's strategy of winning a legislative rescue.

"From our perspective, the days of luxury for Edison are over," said John Moorlach, Orange County treasurer. The county holds $1 million of defaulted SCE bonds in its retirement plan.

Moorlach said he believes that if SCE does not quickly reach an agreement with the generators, they will push the utility into Bankruptcy Court.

"By doing this, the generators are trying to show that they are making a good-faith effort to reach a settlement first," Moorlach said.

But Jay Lawrence, spokesman for the Renewable Energy Creditors Committee, said his members believe the move by the generators shows they have backed off from an immediate involuntary bankruptcy petition filing, at least while they try to open negotiations with SCE.

"We still want to see a legislative solution, and we are against bankruptcy," Lawrence said.

Edison provides electricity to 11 million people. It racked up the $3.9-billion debt over the past year as it purchased high-priced electricity in the fledgling market California created under a 1996 deregulation plan. The state's deregulation plan included a rate freeze that barred Edison from passing the full cost of the power it bought on to customers.

By January, Edison's debt had grown so heavy that power sellers refused to deal with the utility. The state had to step in with taxpayer money to keep electricity flowing. So far, the state has spent $10.7 billion on power purchases.

Edison's counterpart in Northern California, Pacific Gas & Electric, suffered the same financial squeeze in the state's dysfunctional market. PG&E took itself into bankruptcy in April.

The generators' demand came on a day when Edison officials said they were close to winning an agreement from bankers to delay collecting on $200 million in loans until Oct. 19.

Shares of Edison International, the parent company of Southern California Edison, rose almost 5% Friday to close at $13.16 on the New York Stock Exchange.

*

Times staff writer Nancy Rivera Brooks contributed to this report.


THis is to nominate 65,000 MMBtu/d for 3/1 from HPL to Eastrans.

7,000 MMBtu will come from Fuels Cotton Valley.
58,000 MMBtu will be delivered to PG & E.


Maybe now that Joe Sutton is gone, you will not be asked this anymore, but
here is an update (two e-mails) on the two key issues regarding SK JV in
Korea, being Return on Equity and Stranded Cash.  Let me know if you need
more.   mcs
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT on 14/11/2000
14:59 ---------------------------
From: Mike Dahlke@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 14/11/2000 08:40 CST
To: Mark Schroeder@ECT
cc:

Subject: Regulatory Issues in For SK-Enron

Mark,

This write up will give you a quick update on the status of the two key
issues related to Enron's gas distribution business in Korea.  Darrell's
current strategy is to maximize dividends in order to generate cash for Enron
to pay its obligation under the "SK Securities" provisions of the purchase
agreement.  It is expected that SK will direct the sale of those securities
during the coming year and the resulting obligation will be between US$ 15 -
20 million.

One tax issue has emerged that is related to the form of corporation used in
Korea (there are two alternatives).  After considerable negotiation with SK,
it was determined in 1998 that the Joint Venture was limited to one
particular form.  To use the alternative, which positions Enron better for US
taxes, would have required de-listing three of the operating companies.
Hence, if Enron directs dividends to be paid from the JV, or otherwise
distributes cash out of the business (deamed dividend), the amount paid will
be subject to US tax.  This result will occur, according to the Tax
Department, even if Korean withholding tax can be eliminated by taking
advantage of a "tax treaty" country such as Labuon.  Some additional advise
will be sought on the matter but considerable work was done prior to the
formation of the JV and few degrees of freedom were found.

See you in San Antonio

----- Forwarded by Mike Dahlke/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 11/14/2000 08:31 AM -----

	Mike Dahlke
	11/14/2000 08:26 AM

		 To: Michael Gantt/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc: Susan Musch/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Bonnie
Nelson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Anne S
Yao/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 Subject: Regulatory Issues in Project Gecko

As Enron considers how to substantially increase the dividends to be paid by
SK-Enron's operating companies, the following Regulatory issues should be
considered:

Change in the Dividend Limit for CGCs.  MOCIE has proposed that the
limitation of the payment of dividends by a City Gas Company be eliminated if
the firm has a debt-to-equity ratio below 200% (debt-to-total-capital ration
of less that 67%).  Hence, the ability of SK-Enron's gas distribution
subsidiaries to pay "unrestricted" dividends will depend on the level of debt
of each company and not the consolidated debt of the joint venture.  The
language of the limitation amendment does not specify any "effective time".
Reports from MOCIE's "working group" which has been considering this and
other changes to CGC regulations indicate the new standard will take effect
on January 1, 2001.   Presumably at that point, a CGC with a qualifying debt
ratio could pay any amount of dividend allowed under applicable law or
securities regulations.  In considering an "interim" dividend, the impact on
each CGC's debt ratio of the "regular" dividend needs to be considered.  If
retained earnings are reduced to the extent that the debt test is not met
after the "regular" dividend, then the payment of an "interim" dividend would
be a violation of the new limitation rule.

Change in the "allowed ROE".  Another rule change that MOCIE will reportedly
implement shortly will be one that establishes the ROE used in computing
distribution rates (supply cost).  The best information is that CGCs serving
"high penetration" areas (expected to be 70% or more) will have to use the
"one-year bank deposit rate", which is currently about 8%.  Other CGCs will
continue to use the current "fixed rate" of 10%.  For SK-Enron, this appears
to mean that Daehan, which serves Seoul, will be subject to the new standard
while the remaining 8 CGCs would continue to use 10% when computing their
rates.  The Seoul City Government has an annual rate filing process;
therefore, Daehan will be impacted almost immediately by this change.
Several other CGCs (Kumi City, Chonju, and Choognam) have rate cases or rate
case requests pending.  Processing these changes has been held up pending the
issuance of MOCIE's new rules and are likely to proceed promptly once the
rule are issued (presumed to be December 1st at this point).  The final
"order" from MOCIE is not expected to contain any change in the standard time
allowed for a given set of rates - one to three years at the discretion of
the local government.  Hence, no change is expected to the "scheduled" time
for other CGCs to file.


Previous correspondence on the topic of assignment to outside counsel.  See
10/10 email from me below.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 02/12/2001 10:23
AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kay Mann                           10/11/2000 12:35 PM

To: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Schaeffer Property - Livingston County, Illinois

Fred,

I think Kathleen will be a big help to all of us in improving the flow of
paper.  I trust her to work up initial drafts of option agreements, subject
to my quick review and the review of local counsel.

Thanks for your cooperation.

kay

Fred Mitro@ECT
10/11/2000 10:46 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Rusty Stevens/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Schaeffer Property - Livingston County, Illinois

Kay:

The Fehrs and Ledfords did sign their respective option agreements last week
prior to our Zoning Board of Appeals meeting.  I am expecting Karen Way to
forward you an executed original copy of each agreement.  I will check with
her on the status of this.

With regard to the policy, I understand your point.  Rusty and I will work to
better co-ordinate with you in the future.  Perhaps we can lever off of
Kathleen for agreements such as the Schaeffer option.

Let me know.

Fred

	From:  Kay Mann @ ENRON                           10/10/2000 08:51 AM

To: Rusty Stevens/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Schaeffer Property - Livingston County, Illinois

Hi Guys,

Enron policy requires that the assignment of tasks to outside counsel go
through (or at least be coordinated with) the legal department.  In the
future, please let me know what you need so that there can be some order to
the process.

Did the Fehrs and Ledfords sign the option agreements?

Thank you,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/10/2000 08:47
AM ---------------------------

"Way, Karen S. - CHI" <karen.way@piperrudnick.com> on 10/09/2000 02:52:14 PM
To: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "'rusty.stevens@enron.com'" <rusty.stevens@enron.com>,
"'fred.mitro@enron.com'" <fred.mitro@enron.com>, "Gershon, Mark A. - CHI"
<Mark.Gershon@piperrudnick.com>, "Townsend, Christopher J. - CHI"
<chris.townsend@piperrudnick.com>, "Shindler, Donald A. - CHI"
<Donald.Shindler@piperrudnick.com>

Subject: Schaeffer Property - Livingston County, Illinois

Kay:

This morning, Rusty requested that we prepare an Option Agreement for the 29
acre parcel west of the Livingston Energy Center.  This property could be
used as a construction laydown site, but more importantly would provide a
sound buffer for the project.  It is our understanding that the Option
Agreement is to be presented to the property owner at some point next week.
We will forward a draft of the agreement to you no later than Monday,
October 16, 2000.  Please feel free to call me or Don Shindler
(312-368-2175) with any questions regarding the agreement.  Best regards.

Karen S. Way
Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe
203 N. LaSalle
Chicago, Illinois 60601
email:  karen.way@piperrudnick.com
(ph) 312-368-2152
(fax) 312-630-6347

____________________________________________________________________________
The information contained in this communication may be confidential, is
intended only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be legally
privileged.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please re-send this communication to
the sender and delete the original message and any copy of it from your
computer system.
Thank you.

For more information about Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe, please visit us at
http://www.piperrudnick.com/
____________________________________________________________________________


The office of Personnel Management for the Federal Government, today
announced the 2001 Holiday Schedule for Federal
Employees.? There will be two less Holidays in Washington DC next year.
Halloween and Thanksgiving have been canceled.
The reason for this change: The witch is moving to New York and taking the
Turkey with her.
Thanks for your continued support.


This is the Postfix program at host exseamx02.concureworkplace.com.

I'm sorry to have to inform you that the message returned
below could not be delivered to one or more destinations.

For further assistance, please contact <postmaster@concureworkplace.com>

If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
delete your own text from the message returned below.

			The Postfix program

<enron_update@concureworkplace.com>: unknown user: "enron_update"

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MCAUSHOL>
To: enron_update@concureworkplace.com
Date: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 6:31:20 GMT
Subject:

Please direct your concerns to my admin. assistant Nyree Chanaba
at ext. 5-4035

-----Original Message-----
From: enron_update@concureworkplace.com
[mailto:enron_update@concureworkplace.com]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 11:34 PM
To: Causholli, Monika
Subject: Expense Report Receipts Not Received

Employee Name: Monika Causholli
Report Name:   Monika Causholli
Report Date:   10/25/01
Report ID:     1CD662BAC8BB11D5B373
Submitted On:  10/25/01

Receipts for this expense report have not yet been received. If receipts
have been mailed, please disregard this message.

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


A payment test file was sent to the bank in error and, as a result, a deposit
was posted on Monday, July 10, 2000.  This impacts only employees who utilize
direct deposits (ACH) and are paid semi-monthly.

To correct this situation, on Tuesday, July 11, 2000 a withdrawal of the
amount deposited will be processed.  Your bank may not post this transaction
until Wednesday, July 12, 2000.

If you have any questions, please call (713) 345-5555.  We apologize for any
inconvenience.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/05/2001
12:20 PM ---------------------------

Tanya Tamarchenko
02/28/2001 01:17 PM
To: Wenyao Jia/HOU/ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: "analytical" var implementation in RisktRAC

Debbie,
I am forwarding to you a 2 page document describing implementation of
"analytical" VAR in RisktRAC.

Here is why this effort is very important:
1. We need to calculate VAR for other percentile but 5 (1% or even 0.2% as
mentioned by Rick Buy)
and our simulation model can not handle required number of simulations;
2. We need to present additional risk measures (such as Mean Tail Loss) to
the Board.

The analytical approach is implemented in a spreadsheet and fully tested
already so there will be no problems
with the algorithm itself.

We need to get together and discuss IT implementation.

What do you think?

Tanya


UPS Tracking numbers


Mike,

Thanks for the invitation. See you on Friday,
April the 27th.

Vince

Mike Fowler@ENRON
04/11/2001 01:45 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Vince,

I've been out of the office the last few days.

As we discussed Friday, Veronica and I hope you can join us, the Stocks and
the Chaneys (Craig Chaney is with EnronCredit.com) for dinner at 7:00 Friday,
April 27th.

Directions from Research and Gosling:

Go west on Research Forest

Turn left the 2nd time you cross Alden Bridge (stop sign after Kuykendall,
shopping center on right with Albertson's, Exxon).

Go approximately 1.4 miles.

Will pass park and elementary school on left.

Take next left - Noble Bend.

Turn right on the 2nd street - Freestone Place.

We are # 30 Freestone Place - the next-to-last home on the right.

Phone # 281-362-7267

Mike
x39990


I'm trying to clean up after Blue Girl.  Can you tell me again who signs for
LJM so that I can get signature?  Who does their legal work?

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/20/2000 06:58
PM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
12/15/2000 01:22 PM
To: Lynn.DeKrey@swpc.com
cc:

Subject: THE agreement

With high hopes that this is the FINAL final version, I'm attaching what I
believe to be the execution copy.  Some things have been cleaned up, and
Brownsville has been added to paragraph 5.  I'm going to start collecting
signatures.

Thanks,

Kay


I'd like to add the question:  "Can I apply for a job with Dynegy?"

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Denne, Karen
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 4:15 PM
To:	Cash, Michelle; Clark, Mary; James, Terrie; Johnson, Rick
Subject:	FW: Q&A with Michelle's changes

i think this is fairly final... I added one more question.

 << File: business restructuring supervisor Q&A.doc >>

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Clark, Mary
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 12:35 PM
To:	Denne, Karen
Subject:	Q&A with Michelle's changes

 << File: Teminations QA.doc >>

Mary E. Clark
Director, Internal Communications
Phone:  713-853-7325
Fax:  713-853-6790
e-mail:  mary.clark@enron.com


I really don't remember the name, but it was a man.  He specifically quoted
dollar amounts of $9,475.808.18 vs. $9,298,971.71.  Hope this helps!

Thank you very much1


TransAtlantic | The Atlantic Online | http://www.theatlantic.com

March 30, 2001

+ In ATLANTIC UNBOUND, The Atlantic's online journal ...

Crosscurrents
MAUS CULTURE
by Peter Swanson
Mar 29 | "It seems there's a movement afoot to class-up comic books -- both
adult comics, by moving them out of the ghetto of specialty stores and
sci-fi racks, and kids comics, by giving them a significant place in our
pop-culture canon. I do not doubt for a moment the artistic merits of many
of the books and writers in the comics field, adult or otherwise. What I
wonder about is this sudden bid for legitimacy. If some of these upstarts
find themselves lodged between the Styrons and the Tans on the big people
shelves, will they still talk to the superhero comics?" From DC and Marvel
to the latest wave of serious graphic novels, the comic book has come of
age. Peter Swanson surveys the scene, and waxes just a bit nostalgic.
http://www.theatlantic.com/unbound/crosscurrents/cc2001-03-29.htm

Interviews
A. L. KENNEDY: SPASMS OF GRACE
by Julia Livshin
Mar 29 | "There's no bloodlust. And even with a very good matador and a
very good bull, the nature of the thing is that it isn't seamless and it
can't be entirely graceful. There will be spasms of grace. It's a very odd,
ramshackle thing. There are all kinds of strange pauses and clumsy bits,
and patches of costume drama, and then patches of this very odd, sometimes
beautiful communication." A conversation with the Scottish novelist A. L.
Kennedy, whose new book, *On Bullfighting*, describes the "death,
transcendence, immortality, joy, pain, isolation and fear" that is the
Spanish corrida.
http://www.theatlantic.com/unbound/interviews/int2001-03-29.htm

Unbound Fiction
POINTS OF INTEREST
by Robert Cohen
Mar 21 | "And then, I don't know, there was something about the way they
looked that made me think: remember this. The light, the bees humming in
the grass, the lazy inconsequential flow of the afternoon, and your
daughter, your irritable knock-kneed eight-and-a-half year old daughter,
who will never be just this way again, just this tanned and skinny and
unselfconscious, this careless, careless.... I didn't think about it after
that. It was all reflex."
http://www.theatlantic.com/unbound/fiction/2001-03cohen.htm

Interviews
KAREN ARMSTRONG: DIVINE RETICENCE
by Harvey Blume
Mar 21 | "When I first began the study of religion, I found it difficult to
get a handle on Buddhism. It didn't have any of the things I considered
essential to religion, like a supernatural God, a sense of sin, authority
figures, doctrines. But the more I got into religious studies, the more I
began to think that this approach, this reticence about the divine, had a
good deal to recommend it." Harvey Blume talks with the author of *Buddha*,
the biography of a world-historical figure about whom nothing is truly
known.
http://www.theatlantic.com/unbound/interviews/int2001-03-21.htm

Sage, Ink
Mar 30 | JUST A BILL
http://www.theatlantic.com/unbound/sage/ss2001-03-30.htm
Mar 23 | BAAANISHED
http://www.theatlantic.com/unbound/sage/ss2001-03-23.htm
Cartoons by Sage Stossel.

-------------------------------------------------------

+ In D.C. DISPATCH | from National Journal

Legal Affairs
REAL CAMPAIGN REFORM -- FLOORS, NOT CEILINGS
by Stuart Taylor Jr.
Mar 29 | The best approach would be to provide free airtime, mailing
privileges, and other subsidies to eligible candidates.
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/nj/taylor2001-03-29.htm

Media
WARMED-OVER TRUTH
by William Powers
Mar 29 | Almost nobody is undecided about global warming (or, if you
prefer, alleged global warming).
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/nj/rauch2001-03-29.htm

Political Pulse
HOW McCAIN-FEINGOLD WOULD CONSTRICT SPEECH
by William Schneider
Mar 29 | Each new step down this road of restricting political spending and
speech creates new problems and new inequities.
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/nj/schneider2001-03-29.htm

-------------------------------------------------------

+ In POST & RIPOSTE | Forum Highlights

"The Next Ruling Class?"
Has David Brooks drawn an accurate portrait of the meritocracy's next
generation? Join us for a special forum on the April cover story.
http://forum.theatlantic.com/WebX?.ee6f6b3

"Race and Genetic Research"
What are the risks of exploring human genetic diversity? What are the
potential rewards? Join a conversation on Steve Olson's article in the
April Atlantic.
http://forum.theatlantic.com/WebX?.ee6f6af

Marvell's "Coy Mistress"
Readers take up Linda Gregerson's provocative Atlantic Unbound essay on
Andrew Marvell's classic seduction poem.
http://forum.theatlantic.com/WebX?.ee6f550

... and much more.
http://www.theatlantic.com/pr/

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

THE ATLANTIC MONTHLY EDUCATION PROGRAM
Teachers, put The Atlantic's quality to work in your classroom withour new
Education Program. Affordable rates, FREE Teacher's Guide, and FREE
instructor's copy with each qualifying order. Please visit
http://www.theatlantic.com/teach/
for details or call toll-free,(877) 299-8577.

-------------------------------------------------------

GET A RISK-FREE TRIAL ISSUE OF THE ATLANTIC MONTHLY
TransAtlantic readers, you can receive a RISK-FREE trial issue of The
Atlantic Monthly magazine. Just fill in the short form at
http://www.theatlantic.com/free/
and we'll rush our next issue to you. No obligation.

-------------------------------------------------------

To remove your name from our mailing list, send an e-mail to
listserv@theatlantic.com with UNSUBSCRIBE TRANSATL written in the BODY of
the message (subject text will be ignored), or go to the TransAtlantic page
at the URL below, enter your e-mail address and select "Unsubscribe."
http://www.theatlantic.com/transatlantic/

If you would like help or more information, send a message to
listserv@theatlantic.com with the word HELP in the BODY of the e-mail.


-----Original Message-----
From: Julee Malinowski-Ball [mailto:jmball@ns.net]
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 10:45 AM
To: Karen Edson
Cc: Jan Smutny Jones; Steven Kelley
Subject: Gov wants to meet with generators

An excerpt from a SD Union Tribune article this morning, and I quote:

The governor will spend most of this month signing and vetoing hundreds of
bills passed by the Legislature before adjournment last week. He said he
will meet with power generators and "immerse" himself in the electricity
issue next month before proposing reforms in November.

"If people don't act responsibly I am going to name names and publish a list
out in my reception area," Davis said. "We have to do this together."

The governor said that ratepayers, utilities and power generators will all
have to "accept their fair share of pain." He called on all Californians,
including businesses and environmentalists, to act responsibly to bring
electricity supply and demand into balance.

Hinting at reforms, Davis said there may have to be a restructuring of the
industry-dominated Independent Systems Operator, created under deregulation
to run the transmission system and make some power purchases needed to keep
the grid operating.

"Over time I think deregulation will reduce bills," Davis said. "I wasn't
part of putting it in place. I have inherited this. But I believe it can
work."

Julee Malinowski-Ball
Associate
Edson+Modisette
916-552-7070
Fax- 552-7075
jmball@ns.net


Blackline to follow.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/13/2000 01:37
PM ---------------------------

"Thompson, Peter J." <peterthompson@akllp.com> on 11/13/2000 01:27:59 PM
To: "Kay Mann (E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Pipitone, Paul" <paulpipitone@akllp.com>, "Cobb, Christopher"
<christophercobb@akllp.com>

Subject: Gas Turbine Purchase Agreement.DOC

 <<Gas Turbine Purchase Agreement.DOC>>

Sorry for the delay.  Here is the most recent draft of the GE Turbine
Agreement.  I will send the blackline shortly (I hope).
 - Gas Turbine Purchase Agreement.DOC


Include on the report.

Jim
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Montovano, Steve
Sent:	Wednesday, September 05, 2001 9:49 AM
To:	Steffes, James D.
Subject:	FW: NUI SDS Agreement

Jim - This is the SDS deal we pulled of with NUI worth approx. $200,000.  By way of background, EES had lost the original bid in spring 2001.  They contacted me in July to see what, if any, information was available as to why we lost the bid.  Most of the info is not public and hence was n/a. EES had won the bid last year and NUI kept our info confidential as well.  With a minimal amount of time and through my relationship with Maloney, NUI agreed to an Off Tariff deal with us giving us our original terms and conditions.  They also agreed to eliminate the SDS volumetric limitations for future bids.  SM

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tate, Paul
Sent:	Friday, August 31, 2001 1:41 PM
To:	Montovano, Steve
Cc:	Black, Don; Hewitt, Jess P.; Vanderhorst, Barry; Fleming, Matthew; Pendegraft, Sherry
Subject:	NUI SDS Agreement

Steve,

The NUI/EES Letter of Agreement for the "SDS" storage service has been signed by both Enron and NUI.  September gas is scheduled for delivery to NUI.  This service will ensure that certain customer types will receive firm gas all winter.  Kenneth Maloney, of Cullen and Dykman, was helpful and responded quickly to my submitted draft comments, as well as returning a signed copy via fax.

Your opinions, suggestions, and direct involvement with NUI on my behalf have proven invaluable in the resolution of this matter.  I want to thank you (perhaps personally on your next Houston trip) for your efforts.  I also want to share this email with others here on the gas desk that may have been unaware of your participation.
Again, many thanks.

Sincerely,

Paul Tate


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 06/07/2000
06:34 PM ---------------------------

Elizabeth L Hernandez
05/04/2000 12:56 PM
To: David Oliver/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba A Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary
Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sherry Anastas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Valderrama/HOU/ECT@ECT,
William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Theresa Franklin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim
Little/HOU/ECT@ECT, Troy Klussmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Susan Harrison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jefferson D
Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scotty Gilbert/TOR/ECT@ECT, Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Connie Sutton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda S Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT,
David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alton Honore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Feldman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Friedman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mechelle Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Coates/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Cathy De La Torre/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carrie
Hollomon/HOU/ECT@ect, Kyle Etter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Guggenheim/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jay Reitmeyer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gregory A Mausser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly S
Olinger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda H Fletcher/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: April 2000


Jeff,

After your call I thought I should give you some background on Datacentric Broadband (DCB).

1.	The company was founded by Leslie Anderson a woman entrepreneur in Conroe Texas.  Leslie continues to be the largest non institutional shareholder and is Chairman of the Board.  The president is Gary Remy, a Hispanic, whom you met recently at the YPO gathering.

2.	DCB is in the broadband wireless access market focusing on smaller cities in Texas.  They have deployed in nine different locations and have a strategy to grow from a regional player to a national player.  The market they are in requires no license fees and is one where being first to locate in a city is critical to success.

3.	We have invested $2 million in DCB to date and brought in Redstone Investors who also invested $2 million. Redstone should continue to participate with us in any future investments we make in DCB.

4.	We have talked to Kevin Garland  to solicit interest from him, however he made it clear that DCB was not in his target market and he was not interested in the investment.

5.	DCB has engaged Arthur Andersen to help raise additional funds for continued growth.  We along with AA have been talking to other potential investors and have found a receptive yet cautious reception.

6.	About two weeks ago we were approached by representatives of Union Pacific Railroad and Norfolk Southern Railroad with a proposal to invest up to $75 million in DCB over the next five years beginning with an initial investment of $15 million.  U P asked if Enron would be willing to invest a similar amount alongside them to help DCB grow into a national broadband wireless access provider to smaller cities. After this request I asked Ken Rice if EBS would be interested in an investment in DCB either in conjunction with U P or on a stand alone basis.  My hope was that EBS would view DCB as a strategic fit to their business model and would be interested in a much closer relationship with DCB perhaps leading to a buyout. ( Although EBS and  DCB are in different businesses I know that the trading group of EBS has used DCB to provide liquidity and last mile access for many of their trades.)  Ken's response was that EBS was not interested in an investment in DCB and he didn't see a strategic fit between the two companies.

7.	We have also talked to Lou's group, the Xcelerator, and to LJM about investments in DCB and it appears that LJM is very interested in committing funds however I don't think they will be ready in time to match U P's commitment.

8. 	At a subsequent meeting with U P we told them not to expect any additional funds from Enron other that a possible $2 to $3 million from ourselves since that is all of the capacity that we have left for this investment.  They are very disappointed that Enron does not see the strategic potential of this business the way they do, but nevertheless are still moving forward in their efforts to invest in DCB in the $75 million range.  We are currently in the due diligence process with U P and hope to wrap up a deal structure by the end of May.

	 We have solicited the support of other Enron groups all along the way while making our investment decision.  I truly believe that DCB is in a space that could be very integral to the success of EBS and had hoped that we could work together more closely, however EBS does not see a strategic fit with DCB.  We will continue to develop relationships with other strategic and financial partners in order to enhance and grow the value of our investment in DCB.

	I will be happy to talk to you further about DCB and our investment.  We will of course seek your approval for any additional investments that we make in DCB.  Please call me if you have any additional questions.

Gene


hi sara

i'll set something up with you this week if that suits you

...and yes i'll be the conference - see you then!

j

From: Sara Shackleton on 21/03/2001 11:59 CST
To: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: equity trading in the U.K.

Justin:  I haven't heard from you in some time now.  How is everything?  Are
you going to be in San Antonio?

I wanted to set up a short call to discuss equity trading and what Houston
and London can do (are doing?) to stay abreast of activity and developments
on the trading desks.  Please let me know a convenient time for you.

Thanks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Kenneth Lay has approved Cindy Olson's expense report, which is attached.


for your reading pleasure.

tim
---------------------- Forwarded by Tim Belden/HOU/ECT on 04/16/2001 07:25 AM
---------------------------

Alan Comnes
04/13/2001 01:50 PM
To: gfergus@brobeck.com, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, rcarroll@bracepatt.com, Ray
Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Fw: Fact sheet re: Cal ISO study

From the Bonneville Power Administration:
>
> > This fact sheet addresses statements in a recent L.A. Times article
> > asserting that BPA, among others, manipulated prices on the California
> > electricity market.
> >
> > AEs, CAEs and other BPA staff may distribute the fact sheet to outside
> > parties as you believe appropriate.
> >
> >                       <<CA_sales_TP3.doc>>
> >
> > For additional information, contact Steve Oliver at (503) 230-3295.
>

 - CA_sales_TP3.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/22/2000
04:46 PM ---------------------------

Vasant Shanbhogue
12/22/2000 12:23 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Project list

I have organized my team's projects by topic.  Please let me know if you want
me to reorganize by person.
Thanks,
 Vasant


i thought you were going to say you thought of the witty comeback the next morning when you both woke up.


Dinner changed to 6.45pm - 6.30pm is too early for them.  Table for 4 booked
under Vince's name.

Regards,

Anjam
x35383
---------------------- Forwarded by Anjam Ahmad/LON/ECT on 17/02/2000 17:55
---------------------------

Anjam Ahmad
14/02/2000 15:48
To: Steven Leppard/LON/ECT@ECT, Benjamin Parsons/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Invitation to Sunday Dinner with Vince @ 6.30pm

Hi Steve & Ben,

We are planning an early Sunday dinner (one of the few evening slots that are
free in Vince's schedule) at:

Diverso Restaurant
85 Piccadilly
London W1V 9HD
Tel: 020 7491 2222

It's just a few yards to the left of Park Lane hotel on Park Lane, close to
Hyde Park Corner underground and we've been there before.  Vince would like
to discuss the latest developments and it seems like the best opportunity to
do so.  Please let me know if you can make it and I can make sure the table
is booked accordingly.

Regards,

Anjam
x35383

P.S. Vince will be staying at the Park Lane Hotel, telephone number 0171 499
6321


Subject to confirming the status and timing of the Retainage L/C with GE
(now C.1), our only comment is that the reference for the delivery of the
insurance certificates is to Section 5(f) of the Letter Agreement not 5(e)
as set forth in B.13.

Thanks.

Gregory F. Lang
Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP
1055 Washington Blvd.
Stamford, CT 06901

203.961.7446 (p)
203.674.7646 (direct fax)
203.359.3031 (firm fax)
gregorylang@paulhastings.com <mailto:gregorylang@paulhastings.com>

-----Original Message-----
From: Campbell, Carolyn [mailto:CCampbell@KSLAW.com]
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 4:51 PM
To: 'gregorylang@paulhastings.com'; 'iparker@freshfields.com'
Cc: 'kay.mann@enron.com'
Subject: Salmon Closing Checklist

<<2XNK03!.DOC>>  <<2XNKRED.DOC>>

Greg and Isabel:

We have enclosed clean and blacklined drafts of the closing checklist,
marked to reflect changes from the draft previously circulated.  Please
review and advise of any comments.  Thank you.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

Enclosures: 136928v3
136920vR3/2

Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not
the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

"paulhastings.com" made the following annotations on 04/30/01 17:17:13
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NEW E-MAIL ADDRESSES AT PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP

We have changed our e-mail address.  Our new domain name is
paulhastings.com.  In most cases, our address is composed of conventional
first name and last name plus @paulhastings.com.  Here are two examples:
janesmith@paulhastings.com and danjones@paulhastings.com.  If you have any
questions, please contact us at noc@paulhastings.com.

==============================================================================
"The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all
computers."

==============================================================================


Done!
Have a great day!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mims, Patrice L.
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 7:44 AM
To:	Vanek, Darren
Subject:	RE: Cilcorp Energy Services

You are sooooooo crazy!!!!  I'll call you after trading!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Vanek, Darren
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 4:17 PM
To:	Mims, Patrice L.
Subject:	Cilcorp Energy Services

You hurt my feelings b/c you didn't wait for my call.
Give me a call when you can.

-d


My January is very bad, how about early Feb?
Mike

Emilio Vicens@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
12/19/2000 01:39 PM
To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman@ECT
cc: Eric Gonzales@ECT
Subject: Jose Project - Venezuela Visit

Mike, Jeff and Eric,

With the recent change of the President of PDVSA and the already announced
departure of the Minister of Energy and Mines in January, there has been a
significant amount of noise in Venezuela with respect to export projects in
general.  I believe it is critical for very senior Enron people to make a
direct pitch to the President of the country as soon as we can arrange one.
We need to let the President know directly the benefits of the project and
the strong commitment of Enron to the development of the project.  We have
alreday done this several times, but it is time to do it again.

I recommend a visit in early January of maybe Frevert or you Mike (maybe
both). We can also use this visit to have meetings with the new President of
PDVSA and, hopefully, if there is an official Minister appointed with the new
Minister.  It is not easy to fit in the President's agenda, so please advise
the course of action and tentative dates.

Thanks,

Emilio


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 10/08/2000 10:57
AM ---------------------------

"Germany, Mary/COR" <mgermany@CH2M.com> on 10/06/2000 06:07:39 PM
To: "'chris.germany@enron.com'" <chris.germany@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: a few cute cartoons.

Duff likes the freezing one.

 - igloo.gif
 - freezing.jpg
 - everythi.jpg
 - Coke.jpg
 - STRAYBAR.jpg
 - Nintendo.jpg


That sounds fine to me.  If I'm reading it correctly, we are actually
changing the other Gas Daily books to have the same logic as the Gas Daily
Options book currently has.  If my understanding isn't correct please let me
know.  But I think everything thing should be okay to implement tomorrow.

Thanks,
Robin

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Wei Hu                           07/05/2000 06:11 PM

To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Ganapathy Ramesh/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: GAS-DAILY-OPT-GDL

Robin,

The current logic for processing Gas Daily books is as the following:

 If it is a Swap deal (swap_cd is 'S' in ERMS), we check two date conditions
(ref_dt > eff_dt and ref_dt < nextMonthDt);
 If it is a Option deal (opt_cd is 'O' in ERMS), we only check one date
condition (ref_dt > eff_dt).

That's why you saw prompt month positions for 'GAS-DAILY-OPT-GDL', those are
all from Option deals.  Other Gas Daily books either don't have prompt month
positions or the delta position is zero, so you don't see it.

The proposed logic change is even for the Swap deals, we only check one date
condition (ref_dt > eff_dt).  I don't think there will be any double counting
for books like GAS-DAILY-OPT-GDL after the change.

Let me know what you think.

Thanks,

Wei


Attached are the final draft of the talking points on Enron's deal to support
Davis in exchange for competition.

Rick tells me that he intends (with Steve) to talk with Lay about this at the
9:30am tomorrow (on Friday).

Jim


Just a reminder:

Beginning tomorrow, the (formerly twice-weekly) California call will now take place once per week, on Wednesdays, at the same time (11:30 AM PDT/1:30 CDT), same call-in number.
Until the next legislative session starts up in January, the call will be optional for the gang in Sacramento, unless something specific requires their participation.

Best,
Jeff