IVOLUNTEERI
The Spay Nueter Assistance Program (S.N.A.P.) is seeking volunteers to help
care for dogs and cats.  Opportunities vary from working with the animals to
clerical duties.  Please call Patricia Roberson at  713.862.3863.

IHAPPENINGSI
Enron Blood Drive on July 20 from 7 a.m. - 4 p.m. in EB-5C2.  Call
713.853.6100 to schedule an appointment now!
Get CPR/First Aid Certified this month!  Learn the lifesaving techniques for
you and your family.  Learn how to perform adult & infant CPR and how to use
an AED (automatic external defibrillator).  July 25, 1:00 - 5:00 p.m.  Cost
is $10.  To register call the Health Center at 713.853.6100.

IWORKPERKSI
Don't delay!  Get your PerkCard today!  The PerkCard offers discounts at a
variety of merchants around Houston.  Cost is $20 and all proceeds go back
into community programming.  For more information visit the WorkPerks website
at http://home.enron.com/workperks/programs/.

Sign up your middle-school aged child for Summer of Service, a community
service program that is challenging, rewarding and tons of fun!  Children
develop valuable skills and are recognized for their contributions to the
community.  They also will enjoy  weekly Fun Friday outings to recreational
and cultural events. Cost is $160 for a two-week session.  Locations include:
West Side YMCA  713.467.9622 and South Montgomery County YMCA (The Woodlands)
281.367.9622.  Session dates are: July 3 - 14, July 17 - 28.  For more
information call the YMCA location of your choice.

ISAVE THE DATEI
July 13 - Foundation for Financial Literacy workshop. Topic: Use It But Don't
Abuse It: Credit. For a complete listing of workshops, visit
http://home.enron.com/efcu
August 8 - Enron Night at the Astros game.  For more information, click here
http://home.enron.com/cr.


I have directed my boy Eric to do some research and he came up with the
following.  Attendance at one or both shows is a possibility.  Interested?

---------------------- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 03/06/2000 01:18
PM ---------------------------
From: Eric Gillaspie on 03/06/2000 12:58 PM
To: Ryan.F.Ruppert@EXXON.sprint.com, jennifer-gillaspie@reliantenergy.com,
Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lauragammell@hotmail.com
cc:
Subject: KRBE Earth Day Concert & BUZZFEST line-ups

FYI:

BUZZFEST: (April 15th, Cynthia Woods Pavilion, Tix on sale this Saturday at
10:00 a.m.
 THIRD EYE BLIND
 LIT
 TONIC
 THE FLY's
 OLEANDER
 STROKE 9 ("Little Black Back-pack" song)
 OWLSLEY
 STIR
 PETER SEARCY

KRBE/ENRON EARTH DAY LINE-UP (April 1st) Tickets are now on sale, Buffalo
Bayou Park
         Vertical Horizon
                         11:15 - Noon

                       Edwin McCain
                         12:30 - 1:15pm

                        Dido
                        1:45pm - 2:30pm

                       Smash Mouth
                        3:00pm - 3:45pm

                        Goo Goo Dolls
                        4:15pm - 5:15pm

                       Train
                        6:00pm - 7:00pm


NOTE:  YOU WILL RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE EACH TIME YOU ARE SELECTED AS A REVIEWER.

You have been selected to participate in the Year End 2000 Performance
Management process by providing meaningful feedback on specific employee(s).
Your feedback plays an important role in the process, and your participation
is critical to the success of Enron's Performance Management goals.

To complete requests for feedback, access PEP at http://pep.corp.enron.com
and select Perform Review under Performance Review Services.  You may begin
providing feedback immediately and are requested to have all feedback forms
completed by Friday, November 17, 2000.

If you have any questions regarding PEP or your responsibility in the
process, please contact the PEP Help Desk at:

Houston: 1.713.853.4777, Option 4
London:  44.207.783.4040, Option 4
Email: perfmgmt@enron.com

Thank you for your participation in this important process.

The following is a CUMULATIVE list of employee feedback requests with a
status of "OPEN."   Once you have submitted or declined an employee's request
for feedback, their name will no longer appear on this list.

Review Group: ENRON
Feedback Due Date: Nov 17, 2000

Employee Name                   Supervisor Name                 Date Selected
-------------                   ---------------                 -------------
BAUMBACH, DAVID R               JEFFREY C GOSSETT               Nov 06, 2000
PLACHY, DENVER D                DAVID R BAUMBACH                Nov 06, 2000


Thanks

Vince

Shirley Crenshaw
04/11/2000 12:08 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: ANTHONY HAS A NEW BABY BOY!!!

I sent a basket of flowers to Anthony, Mama and the new baby.

Signed:
Congratulations!
"Vince Kaminski and the Research Group"


back to reality with a vengeance, sometimes reality is no fun...I think the weekend in NB will prove beneficial for you as well so enjoy.  I'm guessing I'll end up at the party despite wanting to go to that concert at the Fabulous Satellite Lounge (I hate having a conscience!)  .

no contact with the guy...although i think he went home mid-week for a friend's wedding...regardless, though it may not sound like it, i haven't been too focused on the situation.  on a another "playing with fire" note, went and grabbed a couple pints wednesday with dutch (the old boss) and ended up eating dinner with him as well.  he paid (although he tricked me into letting him, said he was charging it to the company so i'd put my money away...needless to say he didn't expense it).  we've always been friends so i guess one outing doesn't hurt, but any future encounters may have to include others for safety reasons.

i'll see you when you get home.

-----Original Message-----
From: 	"Emily Hillegeist" <ehillegeist@hotmail.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Emily+20Hillegeist+22+20+3Cehillegeist+40hotmail+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Friday, June 15, 2001 11:52 AM
To:	sscott5@enron.com
Subject:	Fwd: Kelly's Bachelorette Party

you are apparently quite elusive.....funk is slightly lifting,but am
thinking weekend in NB will be good medicine.  kind of sad to miss the
party, but am not sure am ready to be a party girl quite yet.  will call
soon- au revoir!  back to reality yet?
e

>From: "Carol Barker" <cbarker3@msn.com>
>To: "Anga Biel" <angabiel@hotmail.com>,	"Ashley Mace"
><Ashley.A.Mace@Williams.com>,	<susan_s_edwards@yahoo.com>,	<susan.s.edwards@us.pwcglobal.com>,	<lgillet@enron.com>,	<katyhester@hotmail.com>,	<ehillegeist@hotmail.com>,	<ljahnke@aerotek.com>,	<ashley_mace@yahoo.com>,	<sexy@mail.utexas.edu>,	"Tara
>Roettinger" <troettinger@hotmail.com>,	<elaina5@hotmail.com>
>Subject: Kelly's Bachelorette Party
>Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 11:31:01 -0500
>
>Hello everyone!
>
>The plan for tomorrow evening is to meet at the Hyatt Regency Hotel in
>downtown Houston between 6 and 6:45.  You will need to give your name at
>the front dest for access to the suite.  It is a keyed off floor so they
>have a guest list to let you up there.  Everyone is invited to spend the
>night in the suite if you want/need to.  So, bring whatever you feel you
>will need.  After meeting there, we will go to dinner at Sambuca downtown
>around 7.  Then we'll go out for awhile, then head back to the hotel for a
>little bit of a bachelorette shower.
>
>If anyone has Susan Scott's e-mail address, please pass this message along
>to her.  If you need to reach us today or tomorrow, please don't hesitate
>to call the house at 281-444-1504 or just respond to this e-mail.
>
>Thanks!
>
>Carol and AndreaGet more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download :
>http://explorer.msn.com

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


current 5110
big one coming on the superbowl.


Folks:  Please see highlighted sections.  Anyone seen Byron's plan?  Know
where it's headed, etc.?

Best,
Jeff
*************************************************************************
Power purchase bills exceed $7.5 billion
Published Tuesday, July 10, 2001, in the San Jose Mercury News
BY MARK GLADSTONE, NOAM LEVEY AND DION NISSENBAUM

Mercury News Sacramento Bureau

SACRAMENTO -- Six months after jumping into the electricity business, the
Davis administration on Monday provided the first detailed glimpse of
California's daily power purchases, showing more than $5 billion in payments,
much of it to government-owned utilities and private companies that state
officials have branded as price gougers.
The state spent an additional $2.5 billion on a variety of contracts and
other electricity services designed to stabilize the volatile energy markets,
according to documents that the state agreed to release last week amid a
legal dispute over public access to the data.
In roughly the first five months of the year, the state shelled out $1.2
billion to Atlanta-based Mirant, the most any company was paid for
electricity, followed by $1 billion to Powerex, the marketing arm of BC Hydro
in British Columbia. It also paid $331 million to the Los Angeles Department
of Water and Power.
The documents raise questions about some of the common assumptions that have
arisen around the electricity crisis. For instance, almost 40 percent of the
state's purchases have come from government-run power generators in
California and elsewhere, but not Texas; some of the biggest suppliers are
from the Northwest.
Gov. Gray Davis, who has ambitions to run for the White House, has put much
of the blame for the soaring costs of power on energy companies based in
President Bush's home state.
The figures are tucked inside 1,770 of pages of invoices that Davis has
resisted divulging, saying disclosure would encourage suppliers to charge
more. The state, which last month released information on its long-term
electricity contracts worth $43 billion, agreed Thursday to release the first
quarter details.
Short on explanation
The figures were disclosed late Monday by the California Department of Water
Resources, which buys power for the state's financially strapped major
utilities, and seem to buttress the administration's contention that the
price of power is gradually dropping but offer little or no explanation for
what prompted the decrease.
In January, for instance, the average price for power on the spot market was
$321 a megawatt hour. It peaked in April at $332 and dropped to $271 in May.
One megawatt powers about 750 homes.
Davis spokesman Steve Maviglio said the price data supports the governor's
assertions that California has been gouged. ``The bad guys are clearly the
out-of-state generators,'' Maviglio said. ``There has been a significant
shift of money out of California.''
But the documents fail to shed much light on whether, as the administration
contends, the price drop was due to long-term power contracts negotiated by
the state earlier this year. Critics contend that the Davis administration
panicked and rushed into deals that commit the state to pay high prices for
many years.
Used for support
Republican officials used the price information to bolster their attacks
against Davis, a Democrat, for signing long-term contracts with power
generators even as the price of power on the spot market was coming down,
partly because of the declining price of natural gas used to fuel many
plants.
``It's more clear than ever that the long-term contracts are a bad deal,''
said Assemblyman Tony Strickland, R-Camarillo. ``The governor's really hurt
the ratepayers for the next five or 10 years.''
The newly released bills highlight the volatility of California's energy
market, where the price per megawatt hour ranged from $70 to $1,000. On any
given day, the records show, the prices from seller to seller varied widely,
with some of the highest prices being charged by public utilities and
companies outside Texas.
On one day in February, for example, San Diego-based Sempra Energy was
charging $165 per megawatt hour, the Eugene Water and Electric Board was
charging nearly $500 and Duke Energy, a North Carolina company, was charging
up to $575.
The state's daily spending peaked May 10 at $102.4 million for all power,
including the spot market and contracted power.
The state began buying power in mid-January on behalf of the state's major
utilities, which were unable to borrow money to buy power after amassing
enormous debts for electricity.
San Jose-based Calpine Corp., which is building several new power plants
around California including one in South San Jose, did only $29 million worth
of business with the state in the first five months of the year, according to
the figures.
The state began buying power in mid-January when Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
and Southern California Edison Co. were on the ropes financially. PG&E later
went into bankruptcy.
On Monday, state lawmakers took another shot at trying to cobble together a
plan to rescue financially ailing Edison.
While most concede that a rescue plan Davis worked out with Edison will not
win the necessary support in the Legislature, lawmakers have created several
working groups to come up with alternatives.
Compromise plan
On Monday, state Sen. Byron Sher, D-Redwood City, unveiled the latest
compromise proposal that seeks to protect average ratepayers and small
businesses from further rate increases and forces everyone else to help
finance the Edison bailout.
The ``shared pain'' proposal would force power producers, owed about $1
billion, to take a 30 percent ``haircut'' and agree to forgive about $300
million in Edison debts. Edison would be asked to swallow $1.2 billion --
about a third of its debt. And big users would be asked to pay off the
remaining $2 billion in debts, possibly by paying higher prices for power.
In exchange, large companies would be given the opportunity to buy power on
the open market, a system that would allow many of them to sign cheap energy
deals.
Sher presented the proposal to Senate Democrats Monday afternoon, but it
remains unclear how much support the framework will receive in the
Legislature.

Contact Mark Gladstone at mgladstone@sjmercury.com or (916) 325-4314.


Hi Terri:

I'll be glad to add you to the email list.  Thanks for letting us know.

   Maureen McVicker
   Steve Kean's Asst.

"Hamby, Terri" <Terri.Hamby@ElPaso.com> on 05/17/2001 08:52:56 AM
To: "'Skean@enron.com'" <Skean@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Conf Call...

Mr. Kean, please add my name/email address to your distribution list.  I am
John Harrison's assitant. (I am afraid he might have missed a call or two.)

Thanks a bunch!

Terri.Hamby@elpaso.com

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender.
******************************************************************


PLEASE SIGN MY NAME AND SEND
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 02/02/2000
04:39 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Peggy Banczak                           02/02/2000 10:01 AM

To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Max Yzaguirre/NA/Enron@ENRON, Ricardo Charvel/NA/Enron@Enron, Dwight
Beach/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Response to Enerstar

Richard:  I have reviewed your draft response letter to Enerstar and have
discussed it with Max.  Attached please find a black-lined version of the
letter reflecting the few minor changes we suggest.  If the revised letter is
acceptable to you, please send it to Enerstar as soon as possible.

Please call with questions or comments.


This is a reminder that the PreBid Meeting is tomorrow (10/24) at 3:30 in
EB30c1.

Laura


Greetings Bill,
Here is a copy of my career goals.
David.
 - Career Goals.doc


FYI - you guys asked me to let you know if we are turning back any customers
- here's the word from Roger Ponce.

---------------------- Forwarded by Jess Hewitt/HOU/EES on 04/03/2001 05:03
PM ---------------------------

	Enron Energy Services

	From:  Roger O Ponce                           04/03/2001 04:57 PM

To: Roger Reynolds/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Jess Hewitt/HOU/EES@EES, Kristann Shireman/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Re: Intel & Tamco High Plains Ethanol done deal

They are existing customers and will be contracted on spot paper.  Also, we
have sent notices of termination to
all month to month customers advsing that a term transaction is necessary for
us to continue service.
Thanks Roger


-----Original Message-----
From: Steffes, James D.
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 9:03 AM
To: Dernehl, Ginger
Subject: FW: CAEM Study: Gas Dereg Has Saved Consumers $600B

Ginger --

Please send to Rick's team.

Jim
-----Original Message-----
From: Thome, Jennifer
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 8:58 AM
To: Dasovich, Jeff; Guerrero, Janel; Steffes, James D.
Subject: CAEM Study: Gas Dereg Has Saved Consumers $600B

FYI - The report is attached.

NGI's Daily Gas Price Index
published : August 14, 2001

CAEM Study: Gas Dereg Has Saved Consumers $600B

Nearly 20 years of competition in the natural gas market has reduced national energy costs by more than $600 billion, according to a new study issued Monday.

This amounts to per-household savings of $5,938 as a result of gas deregulation, which began in the late 1970s with the phased removal of wellhead price ceilings, then graduated to lighter-handed regulation of interstate pipelines and now is focusing on opening up the distribution end, according to the study commissioned by the Center for the Advancement of Energy Markets (CAEM), a non-profit think-tank in Washington, DC.

"The nearly 20 years of competition we've experienced in the natural gas industry proves that the right conditions can foster lower costs for consumers and motivate the industry to make investments that benefit the environment, our economy and our national security," said CAEM CEO Ken Malloy.

In addition to the cost savings to the public, the study credits deregulation for the rise in the number of gas suppliers at the wholesale and retail levels; a reduction in long-term price fluctuations, although it has triggered more short-term price volatility; greater focus on energy-efficient purchases by customers, making gas the fuel of choice for many; and industry improvements in how its buys, sells and trades gas supplies. In addition, it noted that light-handed regulation of gas pipelines has been a big factor in passing through lower commodity costs to consumers.

In short, the study reveals that the gas deregulation skeptics of the 1970s and early 1980s "were wrong by a long shot," according to CAEM.

"What we also need to recognize is that we've witnessed a re-distribution of wealth from foreign oil producers to domestic natural gas producers, and that these lower prices have contributed measurably to a more stable inflation rate, lower greenhouse gas emissions and improved our [national] security due to a reduced reliance on imported oil," said Malloy, who formerly was on the staff at FERC and the U.S. Energy Department.

The study, entitled "California Here We Come: The Lessons Learned from Natural Gas Deregulation," offers much guidance for the energy markets in the western state: 1) put the right regulatory framework in place, half measures are more dangerous than doing nothing; 2) don't expect results overnight, stay the course; 3) markets do work, and consumers and the environment will be winners under properly executed reform; 4) the costs of change are easier to calculate than the benefits; all the studies about gas deregulation underestimated the benefits; and 5) organized consumer advocates are often very wrong about the impact changes will have on consumers.


Good Morning,

Here are this week's stats:

AGA Last Year       +106
5 yr AVG                       +77
Lifetime High            +114 1995
Lifetime Low                        +46         2000
Gas in STGE EIA                 1594
5yr AVG             1147
+/- to 2001              +607
+/- to 5yr AVG           +418
Please have your estimates in by 2:00 (1:00 CST) Wednesday.  Thank you.

(Embedded image moved to file: pic18502.pcx)

This message and any attachments (the "message") is
intended solely for the addressees and is confidential.
If you receive this message in error, please delete it and
immediately notify the sender. Any use not in accord with
its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole
or partial, is prohibited except formal approval. The internet
can not guarantee the integrity of this message.
BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not
therefore be liable for the message if modified.

                ---------------------------------------------

Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le
"message") sont etablis a l'intention exclusive de ses
destinataires et sont confidentiels. Si vous recevez ce
message par erreur, merci de le detruire et d'en avertir
immediatement l'expediteur. Toute utilisation de ce
message non conforme a sa destination, toute diffusion
ou toute publication, totale ou partielle, est interdite, sauf
autorisation expresse. L'internet ne permettant pas
d'assurer l'integrite de ce message, BNP PARIBAS (et ses
filiales) decline(nt) toute responsabilite au titre de ce
message, dans l'hypothese ou il aurait ete modifie.


Have you seen this?
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 07/18/2001 06:38 PM -----

	JBennett <JBennett@GMSSR.com>
	07/18/2001 05:32 PM

		 To: "Harry Kingerski (E-mail)" <Harry.Kingerski@enron.com>, "Jeff Dasovich
(E-mail)" <jdasovic@enron.com>, "Jim Steffes (E-mail)"
<James_D_Steffes@enron.com>, "Sue Mara (E-mail)" <smara@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Attachment A to ACR re: DWR/CPUC Proposed Rate Agreement

-----Original Message-----
From: Wong, John S. [mailto:jsw@cpuc.ca.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 10:17 AM
Subject: Attachment A to ACR re: DWR/CPUC Proposed Rate Agreement

This is Attachment A to the July 18, 2001 ACR inviting comment on the
proposed rate agreement between CDWR and the CPUC.

<<963924.pdf>>

 - 963924.pdf


In response to the email distributed last  Fridayregarding IEP's intervention
in the EOB and CALPX price cap filings at  FERC, IEP is proceeding to draft
comments on the EOB filing.? Much of the  filing will build off arguements
used in the San Diego pleading as well as  comments IEP made to the
Congressional Subcommittee meetings in San Diego.?  In addition, IEP has
intervened for "party status" in the CALPX proceeding on  price caps.?
?
We plan to distrubute comments on Thursday,  convene a conference call
Friday, Sept. 15 at 10:00 a.m.  (PST).
?
The Call-In Number is???  ??? ??? 800/205-3434
The Participant Code  is?????????  111756
?
IEP is still interested in receiving Task Force  commitments to assist in
restructuring/transmission related matters.? While  a numberr of companies
have indicated verbally their interest in the EOB filing  as well as others,
we have yet to receive a written confirmation.? If you  are interested,
please respond to the Friday email soliciting funds.?  Thanks.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Crenshaw, Shirley
Sent:	Wednesday, October 31, 2001 9:38 AM
To:	Adam Stevens (E-mail); Alex Huang (E-mail); Amitava Dhar (E-mail); Anguel Grigorov (E-mail); Anita DuPont (E-mail); Bob Lee (E-mail); Chonawee Supatgiat (E-mail); Christopher Pernoud (E-mail); Gwyn Koepke (E-mail); Heather A. Johnson (E-mail); Jaesoo Lew (E-mail); Jason Sokolov (E-mail); Jose Marquez (E-mail); Joseph Hrgovcic (E-mail); Karthik Rajan (E-mail); Kenneth Deng (E-mail); Kevin G Moore (E-mail); Lance Cunningham (E-mail); Leann Walton (E-mail); Martin Lin (E-mail); Maureen Raymond (E-mail); Mauricio Mora (E-mail); Mike A Roberts (E-mail); Mitra Mujica (E-mail); Nelson Neale (E-mail); Osman Sezgen (E-mail); Paulo Issler (E-mail); Pinnamaneni Krishnarao (E-mail); Pravas Sud (E-mail); Praveen Mellacheruvu (E-mail); Rabi De (E-mail); Rakesh Bharati (E-mail); Sandeep Kohli (E-mail); Sarah Wooddy (E-mail); Seksan Kiatsupaibul (E-mail); Sevil Yaman (E-mail); Shalesh Ganjoo (E-mail); Shane Green (E-mail); Shravan Chopra (E-mail); Sofya Tamarchenko (E-mail); Sriram Vasudevan (E-mail); Steve Bennett (E-mail); Tanya Tamarchenko (E-mail); Therese Candella (E-mail); Tom Barkley (E-mail); Tom Halliburton (E-mail); Vasant Shanbhogue (E-mail); Vince J Kaminski (E-mail); Wichai Narongwanich (E-mail); William Smith (E-mail); Zimin Lu (E-mail)
Cc:	Crenshaw, Shirley
Subject:

Sandeep and Vandhana would like you to celebrate
their daughter's first birthday with them.

The information and directions are attached.

Shirley Crenshaw
Administrative Coordinator
Enron Research Group
713-853-5290
Email: Shirley.Crenshaw@enron.com


Start Date: 3/3/01; HourAhead hour: 22;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001030322.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
+++ Hour 22 - bad data from ISO.
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: Wheelabrat
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 3/3/01
  UNIT_ID: MARTEL_2_AMFOR

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 22 / Preferred:  71.65 / Final:  71.47)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: SCE1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 3/3/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


I'm not sure yet.  I think we are going to be sending two memos  -- one that
I am working on and on that Andy is working on.  It looks to me like the
message below fits better into Andy's memo.  I don't think they will be
combined into one, but I'll know more tomorrow.

From: Sherri Sera/ENRON@enronXgate on 06/11/2001 04:51 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: FW: Draft of Organizational Announcement

Steve, Kevin Garland sent this to me hoping to get Jeff's approval to send it
out from the office of the chairman.  Would it make sense to incorporate it
into the memo you're working on?  Please advise.  Thanks, SRS

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Garland, Kevin
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 3:28 PM
To: Sera, Sherri
Subject: FW: Draft of Organizational Announcement

Announcing the Formation of One Corporate Equity Investing Unit

To better develop and manage equity investment opportunities related to our
core businesses, Enron has formed one corporate equity investment unit.  This
new unit, Enron Principal Investments, will combine the existing investment
units of ENA, EBS and Enron Investment Partners.  Additionally, the Enron
Special Asset Group will also become part of Enron Principal Investments.
The strategy of Enron Principal Investments will be to work with all the
business units of Enron to identify, execute, and manage equity investments,
which leverage Enron's unique and proprietary knowledge.   These investments
may be in the form of venture capital, LBO's, traditional private equity and
distressed debt positions.

Kevin Garland will serve as Managing Director, overseeing all activities of
Enron Principal Investments.  Gene Humphrey, Michael Miller, Dick Lydecker,
and their groups, will join Kevin and his group to form Enron Principal
Investments.  This new business unit will report to an investment committee,
consisting of Greg Whalley, Ken Rice and Dave Delainey.

 Please join me in congratulating and supporting Kevin, Gene, Michael, Dick
and the other members of this group in this effort.

Jeff Skilling


Jeff:
I think we may be past due on when we need to play by, but thats fine.  I think Saturday works for me as well.  I know things are quite busy right now, so good luck with everything.
Ben

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Donahue, Jeff
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 9:25 PM
To:	Rogers, Benjamin
Subject:	RE: Tennis?

Things are a little busy now - when do we have to play by?

I normally play in the morning but maybe next Saturday would work.

See ya.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rogers, Benjamin
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 1:11 PM
To:	Donahue, Jeff
Subject:	Tennis?

Jeff:
It looks like we are playing eachother in the Met's consolation round.  The best time I can play is either after work or some time on the weekend.  Let me know what works for you.
Ben


-----Original Message-----
From: Wong, John S. [mailto:jsw@cpuc.ca.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 10:17 AM
Subject: Attachment A to ACR re: DWR/CPUC Proposed Rate Agreement

This is Attachment A to the July 18, 2001 ACR inviting comment on the
proposed rate agreement between CDWR and the CPUC.

<<963924.pdf>>

 - 963924.pdf


????HOUSTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--April 9, 2001--EC Outlook, a software provider
that automates the collaborative commerce activities of Global 1000 companies
and their trading partners, has signed a licensing agreement with Enron
Corp., one of the world's leading electricity, natural gas and communications
companies, providing both companies with technology to enhance their
commodity-related businesses.
????Enron is planning to use EC Outlook's Smart Document Interchange (SDI)
Server(TM) software to streamline the exchange of certain documents with
trading partners in commodity markets outside of its traditional energy and
communications industries. Such industries include metals, pulp and paper and
others. The SDI Server product helps companies and their partners share
information without invasive hardware and software installations.
????EC Outlook, in turn, will enhance its software offering with proprietary
data interchange applications developed by Enron to manage complex logistical
activities in natural gas and electricity markets. EC Outlook will integrate
industry-specific functionalities and processes from this software into its
own applications to deliver enhanced capabilities to customers.
????"Enron's data interchange technology is a strategic acquisition for us,"
said Matt Verghese, president and COO of EC Outlook. "Coupled with our
existing applications, we can very effectively support the
transaction-intensive needs of energy and other commodity businesses."
????"Commodity markets, like natural gas, electricity and others, will
significantly benefit from electronically automating commerce activities
among trading partners," said Greg Runyan, senior analyst with Yankee Group.
"The agreement between EC Outlook and Enron is a perfect example of how
market leaders can gain a competitive edge."

????About EC Outlook

????EC Outlook's software applications automate collaborative commerce
activities between Global 1000 companies and their trading partners. Powered
by SDI Server(TM) software, these applications enable customers and partners
to quickly connect with one another to share information, regardless of size,
technical sophistication or existing infrastructure. By overcoming
connectivity and data disparity issues, customers have achieved increased
revenues, working capital reductions and short-term payback on their
investment. For more information, visit www.ecoutlook.com.


You will need to contact the credit department,  Veronica Espinoza or Russell
Diamond, request a creditsheet and I will darft an agreement.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 01/25/2001
03:06 PM ---------------------------

Russ Severson
01/25/2001 02:55 PM
To: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, William
Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: George Grant/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: TDS Physical Positions

In order for the physical desks to roll out positions into TDS,  a mapping is
required between the Org region code used in Portcalc
for the physical calc and the related Tagg book code that is used for that
region.

An example would be similar to:

Org Region Code                             Tagg Book Code
CENTRAGULF
FT-INTRA-GULF                        This is just an example and might not be
a valid grouping

 TDS knows the Tagg books to pick up, it just does not know which physical
region codes that are related to it.

Can you provide for your desk all Org Region Codes used on your desk, and
what Tagg Book it would relate to.
If you could send me the list, I will forward them to the TDS developers.

Any questions or concerns, please call me.

Thanks
Russ
x37386


Julie,

That's definitely an option.

We can provide the room. Maybe we can cut with you a special deal for Enron
and increase the # of people attending. I am forwarding your message to
our weather desk.

Vince

Joe,

What do you think about it?

Vince

"Julie" <julie@lacimagroup.com> on 02/15/2001 08:20:24 AM
Please respond to "Julie" <julie@lacimagroup.com>
To: "VinceJKaminski" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: weather course

Vince,
?
We just wanted to let you know that we only have 3 people signed up for the
weather derivatives course (all from Enron) so far.? We have a couple more
that have expressed strong interest, but we are awaiting their final
decision.? If no one else signs up, Chris and Les thought that you guys
could probably get through the first day pretty easily,?and thus thought it
may be an option to teach just the 2nd day material (pricing) only at Enron
(doing it at the Hyatt is an option as well but the room might be on the
large  side)?? We would obviously reimburse you for the day not taught.? We
can teach both days as well, but thought you may want to save some time.?
?
I just wanted to give you some time to think about it.? We will know  where
we stand on final numbers by next Wednesday.
?
Julie
?
?


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/22/99
05:11 PM ---------------------------

Richard MacMinn <Richard.MacMinn@bus.utexas.edu> on 12/18/99 04:09:31 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Hi Vince,

I had intended to call as soon as I set up another meeting in Houston but
that had to be put off due to scheduling problems and a heavier than usual
workload here.

I would like to get together sometime after the first of the year to discuss
some research initiatives.  I may also be interested in the position at
Enron that you mentioned the last time we spoke.  I am currently considering
a few new positions and would like to expand my search.  If you have an
interest in discussing the position then just let me know.  I'll be leaving
town on Wednesday, December 22, and returning December 29 but I am always
virtually here at any of my addresses, e.g., mailto:macminn@cheerful.com
<mailto:macminn@cheerful.com> .

Merry Christmas,
Richard
__________

Richard MacMinn, Editor
The Journal of Risk and Insurance
Department of Finance
The University of Texas
Austin, TX 78712

Office: (512) 471-5758
Fax: (305) 768-0522
Email: mailto:jri@bus.utexas.edu <mailto:jri@bus.utexas.edu>
mailto:richard.macminn@bus.utexas.edu
<mailto:richard.macminn@bus.utexas.edu>
JRI: http://www.aria.org/jri/ <http://www.aria.org/jri/>
Editor: http://macminnr.bus.utexas.edu/ <http://macminnr.bus.utexas.edu/>
Vita: http://home.austin.rr.com/macminn/
<http://home.austin.rr.com/macminn/>

The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do
nothing. Edmund Burke
__________

 - att1.htm


Shanna, talk with Rick but he will be working until June or July then he will
retire and be available as a consultant to us.
m

Shanna Funkhouser@ENRON
02/08/2001 10:09 AM
To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Rick Bergsieker/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Confidential -- Terry Thorn

Mike,

I wanted to let you know that Cindy Skinner passed the information she
gathered on Terry to me.  Please let me know what the status is with his
termination ie; timing, etc. so that I may start the process.

Thanks,
Shanna
X59386


[IMAGE]
[IMAGE] 	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]  Dear Daren:    We're going crazy this Monday, and this Monday ONLY!    [IMAGE][IMAGE][IMAGE]  For every Sports Bucks purchase you make today, we will match 50% of your purchase! That's right, purchase 50 Sports Bucks and we will give you another 25 Sports Bucks absolutely FREE! CLICK HERE!    This offer is only good on Mondays, so be sure to purchase your Sports Bucks by 11:59pm PT and save big!   Take advantage of our fantasy insanity - buy now!    Have fun and may the best manager win!   The Jackpot Sports Team    If you would rather not receive these messages, please  click here .  It will take up to 48 hours for your request to take effect.


Thanks very much for your comments. Pls be assured that Intellibridge and the team will do what they have to, to ensure the substance and format meets our expectations as a company. We look forward to reviewing your remarks, sorry you can't be there. Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shelk, John
Sent:	Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:44 PM
To:	Ibrahim, Amr; Steffes, James D.; Vegas, Dennis; Mara, Susan; Dasovich, Jeff; Kaufman, Paul
Cc:	Shortridge, Pat; Nord, Sue
Subject:	RE: Gine Project-  Briefing book sections DRAFT

I agree.  I am almost through it -- and while there are improvements per our suggestions from the first draft -- there are both substantive and format problems -- i.e., it does not read very well in places, aside from substance.  Will fax Amr my comments on the text and leave with DC colleagues as I will be up in the Senate on RTOs this afternoon.

Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ibrahim, Amr
Sent:	Thursday, September 06, 2001 1:39 PM
To:	Steffes, James D.; Vegas, Dennis; Mara, Susan; Dasovich, Jeff; Kaufman, Paul
Cc:	Shelk, John; Shortridge, Pat; Nord, Sue
Subject:	Gine Project-  Briefing book sections DRAFT

Sue, Jim, Jeff, Paul:
In the context of GNIE Project and the papers that shall be put forward to the participants, I am seeking your help in providing comments on paper one in the list below.  I can not recommend it in its current form since it departs from Enron's line of thinking in many places.  There is a tendency to make these papers neutral, but I found it actually going the other direction.

Kindly advise of your point of view.  It is time sensitve, and I appreciate your help

Brgrds

AI

Dennis:

I shall ask for a delay in reference to this paper for 48 hours till I consult with the colleagues above.  Thank you.

AI

-----Original Message-----
From: 	Vegas, Dennis
Sent:	Friday, August 31, 2001 1:19 PM
To:	Ibrahim, Amr; Shortridge, Pat; Shelk, John
Cc:	Robertson, Linda; Shapiro, Richard; Allen, Margaret
Subject:	FW: Briefing book sections DRAFT

Attached as discussed is the second draft of the briefing documents for the Oct event. They have been separated per our request. These are fresh from Intellibridge and we in Houston have not reviewed them as well, but will be doing so over the weekend.

The documents are attached in the order in which we intend them to appear in
the Briefing Book:

1. Brief History of the Western Power Crisis (Western Power Crisis.doc)
2. Western Power Crisis Timeline (timeline.pdf) -- (Please note that on this
timeline, we still need to cite sources for each of the date entries. Their
graphic designer will be able to do this for us on Wednesday of next week).
3. Responses to the Nation's Energy Crunch (energy crunch clean.doc)
4. Federal vs. State Energy Policy Jurisdiction (fedvsstate.doc)
5. The Status of U.S. Electricity Restructuring (progress of states.doc)

If the regulatory and government team could consolidate their feedback, it would be helpful. Once done, we would like to schedule a call for next Thursday at 3:30 pm, since we would like to do it when Intellibridge is in the DC office.
Regards,

 - Western Power Crisis.doc << File: Western Power Crisis.doc >>
 - timeline.pdf << File: timeline.pdf >>
 - energy crunch clean.doc << File: energy crunch clean.doc >>
 - fedvsstate.doc << File: fedvsstate.doc >>
 - progress of states.doc << File: progress of states.doc >>


It is a bad day getting worse.  Any more questions about how I am doing?  If it rains I am going out and standing in it because it will mean my day is actually improving.  Talk with you later.

Daddy

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Queen28cmh@aol.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Queen28cmh+40aol+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, June 06, 2001 10:59 AM
To:	shorton@enron.com
Subject:	morning 6/6

Good morning.  How are you today?  I'm good but tired.  I was very happy to see it was no longer raining this morning although I think there is still a good chance of rain today.  I'm sure if it does rain it will wait till 5pm so I have to walk to the bus in it but oh well.  I do have my umbrella (for whatever good that will do me!!).  Thanks again for the ride home yesterday.  I love you and hope you have a good day.  I'll talk to you later.
Love,
Caron


1.  Phillips Production / Peoples:
 Price:  @ $2.95/Mcf
 Term:  1/1/2000 - 11/30/2000
 Est. Volume:  500/MCFD  (Actual Volume will vary.)
  I have no way of verifying the actual volume.  Chris Germany and Angie
Zeman will try to get into CES's  PNG pool via E-Script.  This may be  the
only way to verify actual volumes.  I have a call into Phillips to see if
they might have a pipeline statement verifying volumes.

2.  Braxton Oil & Gas / EQUITRANS (Sitara #220864):
 Price:  100% TCo Appalachian Index, less gatthering and/or processing
 Term:  4/1/00 forward
 The $3.086 price was for the period 11/1/99 through 3/31/00 for 2,000
Dth/month with the balance @ 100% TCo Index, less  gathering and/or
processing.
 The original CES deal, done on 7/28/99 for the period 11/1/99 - 3/31/00, was
structured as follows:
  18,000/month CNG @ $3.086, balance @ 100% CNG Index
  10,000/month TCo @ $3.086, balance @  100% TCo Index;
  2,000/month EQUITRANS @ $3.086, balance @ 100% TCo Index.
  Above prices less gathering and/or processing.

John

Wade R Price@ECT
08/22/2000 05:32 PM
To: John M Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Mary Theresa Franklin/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Phillips Production PNG gas

For July, Phillips for PNG billed 12234 in volume (4391 at 3.02  and 7843 at
2.95)  Sitara only has a deal for the 2.95  on  301/day=9331.  Can you
clarify the pricing and volumes?

Also, I left you a voice mail about Braxton pricing for their Equitrans
production.  Please reply.

Thanks

WRP


The attached file contains the June '00 FOM citygate volume requirements and
storage injections/(withdrawals).   Please note that the Exhibit 1 volumes in
Col, N of the worksheet entitled "Jun EPA Vol'' have been adjusted down to
reflect the recent withdrawal by CES from the C&I markets behind most of the
LDC gates.

Please call me if you have questions or problems regarding the attached.   CES
schedulers please note that you do not have to save copy of this file.  It is
archived in P:\Energy Ops\Enron\Jun00\  on our network.

Doug Kinney
Ph:  703-561-6339
Fax:  703-561-7317

 - Jun00_FOM_Req.xls


A little light reading.  Another will follow.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/13/2000 09:08
AM ---------------------------

"Boyd J. Springer" <Boyd_J._Springer@jonesday.com> on 06/12/2000 07:23:44 PM
To: dtucker@bracepatt.com, cdade@bracepatt.com, Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Agency Agreement

_______________________________________________________________

This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read,
copy, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the
sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system.
Thank you.
_______________________________________________________________

Here are my comments re Peoples' mark-up:
                                         1. Sects. 1.1, 1.11, 10.2, and
15.1(f). The combined effect of the proposed changes to these sections is
to significantly broaden the terminantion right in the event that
governmental action related to the agreement is modified in a manner
unacceptable to either party. As changed the unacceptable approval can come
at any time during the term of the agreement, and need not  involve
approval  "required" for the agreement to remain effective. Peoples did not
propose to include language from the comparable NIGAS Hub Agreement which
refers to adverse "rate approval". However, Peoples' intent may be to
obtain a termination remedy in the event of an adverse rate-making decision
re the treatment of Hub revenues. In any event, the meaning of a
termination right triggered if a government approval (not necessarily
required for the agreement to remain in effect) is modified "in any manner
which is unacceptable" is, at best, unclear. We should try to stay with the
original language (or, perhaps, limit expansion of the termination right to
circumstances when a "required" approval is revoked.) While the broadened
termination right proposed by Peoples is available to either party, I
wouldn't think it likely that MEH would wish to terminate as a result of a
modified regualtory decision not required for continuation of the agency
arrangement.
2. Sects. 1.6, 7.1. 2.2, 2.10 (comments re cumulative net revenue
definition) As modified, MEH is charged with the duty to market Hub
Serivces, which includes Extended Hub Serivces (Def'n. 1.17). However, the
proposed Adminisatrative Service Fee (7.1) is only payable during the term
of the Agreement. MEH, therefore, is required by the Agreement to market
extended Hub Services, but receives no compensation (after termination of
the Agreement) for doing so. Also, Peoples proposes to add provision (C)
eliminating refund amounts from the definition of Cumulative Net Revenue.
Apparently in conjuction with this, Peoples proposes to delete the last
sentence of 1.6 which requires a retroactive adjustment of cumulative net
revenue in the event of a refund. Peoples also has bracketed 7.3,
apparently intending to exclude it. I suppose this is fine from MEH's
perspective. The effect of these changes is to deduct only amounts actually
refunded from the revenue base for the administrative fee, and not require
a retroactive adjustment. This could benefit MEH if the agreement
terminates before a refund is required. No retroactive adjustment would be
needed.
3. Sect. 1.9, 2.5. Peoples proposes to delete the requirement that it make
nominating or scheduling changes on interstate pipelines for receipt or
delivery of gas needed for hub transactions or delivery of gas at a
secondary point for displacement delivery. Northern Illinois Gas Co. did
agree to these provision in the contract with its Hub Agent. I do not know
the value of these commitments to MEH from a business standpoint.
                         4. Sect. 1.13. Peoples proposes that the GTC be
defined to included changes made by Peoples in its sole discretion.
Peoples, however, is not free to change the GTC as it sees fit. FERC may
elect to allow changes proposed by Peoples to become effective, but Peoples
can, at most, "propose" changes in its sole discretion. How about: "the
effective general Terms and Conditions of the Operating Statament as may be
modified from time to time." Sect. 6.1 gives Peoples a right to propose
changes to the GTC, so there is no need to cover that here.
                              5. Sect. 1.17. The GTC does not indicate that
Parking and Loaning Service must be interruptible. I will review this
further.                      6. Sect. 2.2. Peoples has modified the
language giving it responsibility to ensure compliance with the GTC to
assign this obligation to both parties. The intent was to comply with
requirements of FERC orders indicating that an agent need not be
certificated as a "natural gas company", if there is another entity with
clear responponsibilty to ensure compliance with the Natural Gas Act and
FERC regulations. I suggest we stay with the origianl language indicating
that Peoples, the certificate holder, has the responsibility to ensure
compliance with regulatory requirements.
          7. Sect. 2.4b The thrid sentence is confusing in light of the
sending sentence indicating that MEH must consent to a change in
information re firm capacity. Perhaps "in its sole discretion" can be
delted and the last word of the third sentence changed to "appropriate".
                              8. Sect. 2.5. New Item 3 of the list of
grounds for refusal should be deleted. The GTC (Sect. 8.2) specifies the
grounds on which Hub Serivce can be denied. The Agency Agreement should not
add to this. Also, the GTC expressly requires that firm serivce provided
under the Operating Statement and firm serivce under peoples' Illiniois
tariffs have equal scheduling priority.
                                   9. Sect. 2.10. This Section places the
risk of non-payment on MEH, unless Peoples conducts the credit check. This
is how risk was allocated in the NIGAS Hub Agreement. That agreement,
however, provided for a 50/50 split of Hub revenue. As proposed by Peoples,
MEH would receive only an agency fee and lesser percentage of revenue. With
the changed allocation of revenue, a changed allocation of non-payment risk
also may be appropriate. Normally, the this risk should follow
responsibility for accepting the transaction. At a minimum, non-payment
risk should be assigned to Peoples if (i) it performs the credit check; or
(ii) requires MEH to accept a Hub customer which MEH has rejected based on
a credit analysis conducted under the GTC (Sect. 8.2).
     10. Sect. 3.3. The required refunds could be large relative to the
administrative fee. The revised language requires MEH to finance refunds
for ten business days. Should there be an interest component?
                                                        11. Sect. 3.4. This
Section suggests that MEH will receive a fee for Extended Hub Services. I'm
don't see how this occurs under the revised language.   12. Sect. 3.5.
Peoples proposes to delete the language requiring best efforts to minimize
imbalances. Compliance filings due this summer under FERC Order 637 are
expected to offer incentives related to avoidance of imbalances and Peoples
should attempt to use these procedures. We should discuss this with them on
Wed.
                    13. Sect. 5.1. Peoples has modified the warranties to
indicate consistency of the Agency Agreement with "material" contractcs and
Judgments or Laws not expected to have a material adverse effect. Is it
suffucuent to have minor contract violations and inconsistency with some
Laws/Judgments?               14. Sect. 7.1 The NIGAS Hub Agreement did not
have a flat fee component.
15. Sect. 10.1. Because the Governmental Approval must be acceptable to
both Peoples and MEH, People should not have "sole" authority to prepare
and file all applications.
                                         16. Sect. 10.2. See comments above
re Governmental Approval. Also, I don't think there is a need for the word
"expressly" in the first sentence.            17. Sect. 11.1. Should the
Section require consent for transfer by operation of law if we wish to have
this requirement in the event that the Hub facilities are sold?

          18. Sect. 15.1 (a). If this type of provision is going to be
included, should there at least be an initial period (say a year) to get
started which doesn't trigger a termination right? The NIGAS Agreement had
a section along these lines.
          19. Sect. 15.1 (f). See comments above re Governmental Approval.
                                                   20. Former 15.1 (f) now
deleted. This provided that the Agency Agreement could be terminated is MEH
is dissolved. This seems necessary to me.          21. 15.1 (g) Peoples
wishes to have sole discretion to change its Facilities or the GTC, but
proposes to limit MEH's termination right in the event that such a change
impairs the HUB's marketability. It seems reasonably to allow MEH to
terminate if it believes that HUB marketability is impaired, without a need
to demonstrate reasonableness.
                                         22. Sect. 17.1 I don't understand
why Peoples wishes to require confidentiality for the compensation
sections. The Illinois Commission Staff and interested parties would have
access to this information under a protective agreement. This would
unnecessarily complicate the approval process and I don't know what there
is to gain from secrecy. These provisions were part of the public record in
the NIGAS approval case.                                     That's all.
Let's discuss tomorrow.


Vince, I want to congratulate you on your promotion to Managing Director!  As
I scanned the list of people who were promoted, I was so pleased to see your
name on the list.  As large as Enron is, it is refreshing to see people like
you with incredible skill and talent  receive deserving promotions.  I have
certainly enjoyed working with you and the R&D team over the past year and
look forward to a successful 2000 as we break new ground for ET&S.  Kim.


Guys, please attend if available.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 06/20/2000
09:42 AM ---------------------------

Kevin M Presto
06/20/2000 09:11 AM
Sent by: Felicia Doan
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Donahue/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Berger/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Zufferli/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Rogers Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly
Hillis/HOU/ECT@ect, Marsha Schiller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tamara Jae Black/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Distributed Generation Business Overview Meeting

Please accept this as confirmation to attend the "Distributed Generation
Business Overview" meeting on Thursday, June 22nd @ 4:00pm in EB3316.  If
anyone should have any questions/concerns, please feel free to give me a
call at ext. 3-5709.

Many Thanks,

Felicia Doan
for Kevin Presto


Dear Charlie,

We appreciate the opinions of our members - that's why we need your help today.
We would like to ask you a few questions in a brief survey.

The entire survey should not take more than 10 minutes of your time and your
opinions will go a long way in helping us to develop products and services
that best meet your needs.

Simply click on the link below to give us your opinion.
http://btrack.excite.com/r.pl?redir=http://www.insightexpress.com/ix/showSurvey.asp?id=38175&accessCode=6171411224&noemail=true&CP=517&SEG=556&BID=1446&FORMAT=T&USER=weldonvc

Once again, we appreciate your support.  As always, your responses will be
kept in the strictest confidence and will only be viewed in conjunction with
others who have responded to this survey.

Thanks,
The Excite Team

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You received this email because when you registered at Excite you agreed to
receive email from us. To unsubscribe click the link below.  Please note,
changes may take up to one week to process.
http://btrack.excite.com/r.pl?redir=http://optout.excite.com/e/email_ex_unsub.html?EMAIL=v.charles.weldon@enron.com&CP=517&SEG=556&BID=1446&FORMAT=T&USER=weldonvc


we all got laid by a gang of hot cougars.  i had to take your portion since
you weren't there.


--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=CTONKS>
To: Tonks, Colin </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Ctonks>, Shively, Hunter S. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Hshivel>, Gaskill, Chris </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Cgaskill>, Arteaga, Airam </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Aarteag>
Date: Wednesday, June 6, 2001 3:12:43 GMT
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=CTONKS>
To: Tonks, Colin </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Ctonks>, Shively, Hunter S. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Hshivel>, Gaskill, Chris </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Cgaskill>, Arteaga, Airam </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Aarteag>
Date: Wednesday, June 6, 2001 3:13:14 GMT
Subject:


-----Original Message-----
From: Rucker, Roy P [mailto:ruckerrp@bp.com]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 12:39 PM
To: Hayhurst, D M; Chuck Dooley (E-mail); McPherson, Dennis L; Moore,
Jeffery D; Swartz, Kevin J (AMA); Mike Griffith; Martin, Toni A; Ronnie
Lyles (E-mail)
Subject: FW: Miss Afghanistan

>
>

 - MISSAFGH.JPG
 - ATT331482.txt


have you two talked?

---------------------- Forwarded by Joan Quick/HOU/ECT on 01/19/2001 12:03 AM
---------------------------

"Ken" <kckrisa@apex2000.net> on 01/02/2001 01:47:39 PM
Please respond to <kckrisa@apex2000.net>
To: <Joan.Quick@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: January Wildhorse Letter Agreement

Joan,

I am assuming that you will be forwarding a January Wildhorse letter.

I have a call into Gerald; I need one question answered on the agency
agreement.

I would like to discuss the swaption with you this afternoon.  I will be a
conference call at 2:30 to ??  I should be available after 3:30pm.  Let's
get that rolling as well.

Talk to you soon.

Ken Krisa

-----Original Message-----
From: Joan.Quick@enron.com [mailto:Joan.Quick@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 11:27 AM
To: kckrisa@apex2000.net
Subject: Re: January Wildhorse Letter Agreement

sure.

where do we stand on signing that agency agreement?  and the ISDA?

joan

"Ken" <kckrisa@apex2000.net> on 01/02/2001 11:18:09 AM

Please respond to <kckrisa@apex2000.net>

To:   "Joan Quick \(E-mail\)" <joan.quick@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  January Wildhorse Letter Agreement

Joan,

We have not executed a January Wildhorse Letter Agreement - will you
forward
the info for me to get one out.  Thx

Ken


Attached is the file that contains the details behind the table below.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Comnes, Alan
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 2:07 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff; Thome, Jennifer; Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.;
Mara, Susan; Perrino, Dave; Belden, Tim; Alvarez, Ray; Palmer, Mark A. (PR);
Calger, Christopher F.; Calvert, Gray; Etringer, Michael; Fillinger, Mark;
Page, Jonalan; Buerkle, Jim; Hyde, Crystal
Cc: Elafandi, Mo
Subject: RE: DWR Stranded Cost Update--CONFIDENTIAL

All:

The DWR contract analysis has now been updated to include the gas-indexed
deals.  The total out-of-market for executed contracts stands at $12
billion.  As you can see 7 counterparties hold contracts in excess of values
indicated by recent curves by $500 million or more.

Thanks goes to Mo Elafandi for pushing this analysis through the structuring
group.

GAC

Mark-to-Market of
DWR Contracts By Counter Party
($s, negative number means contract is above market)
Calpine	-$4,479,764,629
Coral	-$1,493,874,018
Williams	-$1,056,234,556
Dynegy	-$987,044,991
Allegheny	-$958,949,529
High Desert	-$674,251,353
Sunrise	-$551,894,408
Dynegy	-$471,117,317
GWF	-$432,339,191
Mirant	-$265,644,251
Constellation	-$165,463,637
El Paso 	-$128,334,382
Morgan Stanley	-$82,462,946
Alliance	-$75,169,854
PG&E Gen	-$63,165,408
Clearwood	-$41,423,566
IID	-$13,035,452
Duke Energy	-$2,052,733
Total Overmarket PV	-$11,942,222,221

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Comnes, Alan
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 9:23 AM
To: Comnes, Alan; Dasovich, Jeff; Thome, Jennifer; Shapiro, Richard; Steffes,
James; Mara, Susan; Perrino, Dave; Sharma, Ban; Belden, Tim; Alvarez, Ray;
Palmer, B. Scott; Palmer, Mark; Calger, Christopher F.; Calvert, Gray;
Etringer, Michael; Fillinger, Mark; Page, Jonalan
Subject: RE: DWR Stranded Cost Update

I am resending the same file as before (although to a larger group) and  need
to make a correction regarding one assumption.  I am told the analysis does
not yet include the gas indexed contracts.  We're working on getting them
included and when they are, the overmarket value will likely increase.
 -----Original Message-----
From:  Comnes, Alan
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 3:04 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff; Thome, Jennifer; Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James; Mara,
Susan; Perrino, Dave; Sharma, Ban; Belden, Tim; Alvarez, Ray
Subject: DWR Stranded Cost Update

Using information pulled together by Jennifer and BAN, I requested West
Tradings Risk/Structuring Group do a more careful analysis of the
above-market costs associated with the DWR contracts.  Attached is their
analysis.

In this analysis we examined only the executed contracts and NOT the
agreements-in principle.  (Only executed contracts were released by the state
in the last few weeks.) Also, gas-indexed contracts were examined on their
nongas costs only.  Since gas costs are a pass through on some contracts, we
excluded them as a conservatism; i.e., we did not ascribe costs to the gas
portion of the contracts since they will float with market costs over time.
These contracts were marked to market using current, applicable curves.
Finally we discounted at the LIBOR rate, which is around 4%/year.

The stranded cost under these assumptions  is approximately $10 billion.  The
spreadsheet shows the overmarket costs by contract.  Note: a negative
"mark-to-market" equals a positive stranded cost.

As before, this analysis is based upon Enron's confidential forward curves.
Approval from Tim Belden is needed before this analysis can be released.

Alan Comnes
 << File: Stranded Cost Analysis Structuring Confidential.xls >>

 << File: Stranded Cost Analysis Structuring Confidential.xls >>


Please take a look and get back to me ASAP.  I intend to e-mail results to
Rick, Harry and Jim COB today.


Received form Doug. I will talk to Doug and update you as appropriate.  Please let me know if you wish instead to schedule a meeting on this.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gilbert-smith, Doug
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 11:43 AM
To:	'danielle.jaussaud@puc.state.tx.us'
Cc:	Theriot, Kim S.; Portz, David; Forney, John M.
Subject:	FW: Texas PUC Request
Importance:	High

Danielle,

Thank you for the invitation to discuss scheduling activities for the month of August. As I am sure you are aware this company is undergoing a significant period of turmoil. It would therefore be of great help if you could send a list of specific questions so that we may be able to answer them directly.

If it would aid your understanding of our activity, we have full requirement obligations in both the North and South zones that were to ramp up starting in July. This load was to reach in excess of 100 MW by September. However, the speed of switching and the location of this load were not known. In addition, we have resources off 2 power plants, both located in the South. One of these plants is consistently subjected to various types of command and control dispatch by the ISO and we are obligated to find a market for any residual energy.

I trust this paints a picture of what we do and can help clarify any questions you may have. At this time, I do not feel we are in a position to comment on the actions of other QSEs as any information we have would be purely anecdotal.

I trust all is well,

Doug Gilbert-Smith
Director, Ercot Trading

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Theriot, Kim S.
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 10:06 AM
To:	Day, Smith L.
Cc:	Gilbert-smith, Doug
Subject:	Texas PUC Request
Importance:	High

See info. below. I received a call this a.m. from the PUC.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Jaussaud, Danielle" <Danielle.Jaussaud@puc.state.tx.us>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 9:04 AM
To:	Theriot, Kim S.
Subject:	FW: Meeting Request

> I would like to invite you to meet with the PUC Market Oversight Division
> (MOD) staff to discuss certain load scheduling activities of the Enron
> Power Marketing QSE.  The MOD staff is trying to correctly interpret the
> load scheduling data we have analyzed for the month of August 2001, and we
> believe that a meeting would be mutually beneficial in that respect.
> Please let us know who would be the Enron representative who could best
> answer questions about your company's scheduling activities, and whether
> that person would be available in the afternoon of Monday, December 3.
> This is an informal meeting and we do not intend to have a PUC lawyer at
> the meeting.  However, if you do decide to have an attorney represent you
> at the meeting, please advise us.
>
> Thank you for your cooperation and best regards.
>
> Danielle Jaussaud
> Director of Economic Analysis
> Market Oversight Division
> Public Utility Commission
> 512-936-7396


In reference to Steve Kean and Cindy Olson's previous memo on the PRC,
one-hour classes for preparing and communicating performance feedback have
been scheduled.  If you would like to learn how to present feedback in an
effective and positive manner, please feel free to attend any of the
following classes:

Tuesday January 2 8:30 am to 9:30 am Room 49C4
    1:30 pm to 2:30 pm Room 49C4

Wednesday January 3 8:30 am to 9:30 am Room 20C2
    1:30 pm to 2:30 pm Room 20C2

Monday January 8 8:30 am to 9:30 pm Room 49C1
    1:30 am to 2:30 pm Room 20C2

Tuesday January 9 8:30 am to 9:30 am Room 49C4

Wednesday  January 10 8:30 am to 9:30 am Room 49C3
    1:30 pm to 2:30 pm Room 49C3

Thursday January 11 8:30 am to 9:30 am Room 49C4

NOTE:  Notification of attendance is not necessary.


I'm about done.  How about you?


Do you do expense reports and have not taken the training?

Expense Management System (XMS) - Cost: $135
         June 4th		8:30am-11:30am	EB564
June 19th	1:00pm-4:00pm		  EB564

The Expense Management System (XMS) is a tool used to electronically submit your expense report for approval and payment through the Enron Intranet. It is user friendly, accurate and less labor intensive for you and the accounting staff.  This system will help you report your travel and entertainment expenses.

You will learn how to:
E	Create New Expense Reports
E	Enter Cash Expense Receipts
E	Adding Company Card Entries
E	Enter Personal Car Mileage
E	Foreign Currency Translation
E	Reimbursement Method
E	Designating your Approving Manager
E	Designating your Administrative Assistant
E	Submitting Your Expense Report
E	Reviewing your Expense Report
E	And Much More...

Please login and enroll through the InvestInMe website, http://www.corptraining.com/index.cfm?company=enron.  If you have any questions, please call 713 853-1816.


When: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 2:00 PM-3:00 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US &
Canada).
Where: EB 3302

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*


While  markets  digest  the  impact of the ECB's surprising, but apparently
credibility  damaging  interest rate cut on both European asset markets and
the  euro,  the  Fed  will  rub salt into the wounds this week with another
aggressive  ease  in  policy. Although this may be the last ease this year,
recent  market  moves suggest that the Fed has done enough to support hopes
of  a  recovery  in  H2.  The ECB in contrast, by last week's price action,
still  has  some  way  to go, leaving EUR/USD vulnerable to new lows in the
very short term.

(See attached file: wcal010514.pdf)

      Carr Futures
      150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
      Chicago, IL 60606  USA
      Tel:  312-368-6149
      Fax:  312-368-2281
      soblander@carrfut.com
      http://www.carrfut.com
 - wcal010514.pdf


Tanya:

I don't remember if I forwarded this on or not.  When we receive counterparties' paper, should we forward on to you or would you prefer we send them to Jay or someone else?

Marie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Cooper, Chris" <Chris.Cooper@ElPaso.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Cooper+2C+20Chris+22+20+3CChris+2ECooper+40ElPaso+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Friday, August 03, 2001 12:48 PM
To:	Heard, Marie
Cc:	Shuttee, John
Subject:	Enron North America & Coastal States Trading, Inc.  ISDA 8/3/01

Hello Marie, per our conversation this morning, please find attached Coastal
States Trading, Inc.'s standard schedules, along with a copy of our guaranty
format.  We prefer to make proposed changes directly on the electronic
version(as opposed to hard copy).  Please red-line the schedule on the PC,
put a draft date in the upper right hand corner of the first page of both
schedules, then email the schedules back to John Shuttee for review.  John
will handle all negotiations for this ISDA.  He can be reached at
713/420-3548 or john.shuttee@elpaso.com.

Thanks for attention to this matter.

CKC

 <<Coastal Guaranty Format (update).doc>>  <<ISDA CST CSA Schedule 2.doc>>
<<ISDA CST Master Schedule 3 - .doc>>

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender.
******************************************************************

 - Coastal Guaranty Format (update).doc
 - ISDA CST CSA Schedule 2.doc
 - ISDA CST Master Schedule 3 - .doc


Please see attached as promised by Peter Styles just now.


All,
	I attended the Market Issues Forum at the California ISO yesterday and wanted to inform you of an important upcoming change in Grid Management (GMC) rates.  Starting January 1st, 2002, the CAISO anticipates raising GMC charges significantly.  They cited the following reasons for this:  1.  An under collection of GMC for year 2001, this must be past on to the following year according to the tariff.  2.  The lack of credit for the CAISO, increasing interest charges, as well as creating an inability to issue bonds for capital projects.  They must raise 100% of any capital expenditures in the current fiscal year, rather then spreading out the cost over a number of years with a bond issuance.  3.  A decrease in overall market volumes.  GMC is allocated on a flat fee, per megawatt basis, so decreasing volumes results in decreasing collections.
	The CAISO points out their costs will remain flat from 2001 to 2002.  They anticipate volume levels next year similar to what current volumes are, thus reducing the amount of megawatts they can effectively spread out their GMC charges over.
	I have the following observations:  1.  Despite the decrease in volumes, and the decrease in overall market activity, the CAISO has no plans to reduce its current workforce of 500+ employees.  2.  When posed the question: Is CERS charged GMC for out of market energy?  Their answer was circumspect at best.   3.  The CAISO currently does not assess GMC charges to ancillary service volumes, they indicated however that they are strongly considering changing this policy to increase the denominator that they can spread out GMC.
	The CAISO would also like to point out that these increases are worse case scenarios, and may not be this high.  But as we are all aware, in the California energy market, the worst-case scenario ends up looking optimistic in comparison to what actually ends up happening.  Below is a detailing of the changes.

-Kit

Charge Code	Description	Current Rate	Proposed New Rate	Percentage Increase
521	Control Area Services Charge	$0.4060 	$0.5140 	27%
522	Inter-zonal Scheduling Charge	$0.2230 	$0.3080 	38%
523	Market Operations Charge	$0.9510 	$1.6080 	69%


You Gotta Have Faith

There was this Christian lady that had to do a lot of traveling for her
business, so she did a lot of flying. Flying made her nervous, so she
always took her Bible along with her to read and it helped relax her.

One time, she was sitting next to a man. When he saw her pull out her
Bible, he gave a little chuckle and went back to what he was doing. After
awhile, he turned to her and asked, "You don't really believe all that stuff
in there do you?"

The lady replied, "Of course I do. It is the Bible."
He said, "Well, what about that guy that was swallowed by that whale?"
She replied, "Oh, Jonah. Yes, I believe that, it is in the Bible."
He asked, "Well, how do you suppose he survived all that time inside the
whale?"

The lady said, "Well, I don't really know. I guess when I get to heaven, I
will ask him."
"What if he isn't in heaven?" the man asked sarcastically.
"Then you can ask him." replied the lady.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
Texas Wisdom!

1.Never slap a man who's chewin' tobacco.

2. Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad
judgment.

3. Lettin' the cat outta the bag is a whole lot easier 'n puttin' it back in.

4. If you're ridin' ahead of the herd, take a look back every now and then to
make sure it's still there.

5. If you get to thinkin' you're a person of some influence, try orderin'
somebody else's dog around.

6. Never kick a cow chip on a hot day.

7. There's two theories to arguin' with a woman. Neither one works.

8. If you find yourself in a hole, the first thing to do is stop diggin'.

9. Don't squat with your spurs on.

10. It don't take a genius to spot a goat in a flock of sheep.

11. Always drink upstream from the herd.

12. Never miss a good chance to shut up.

13. There are three kinds of people: The ones that learn by reading, The few
who learn by observation, and the rest of them who have to touch the fire to
see for themselves if it's really hot.


Hello Ladies,

Attached below is the Credit worksheet for Bayer Corporation.  This is
another counterparty that Caroline Abramo would like to set up for financial
trading, please contact her regarding contact information.  If there are any
questions regarding the credit, give me a call at x6-6002.

Thanks again,

Veronica Espinoza


Pat Radford
Enron North America Corp.
EB3869
713-853-9282
----- Forwarded by Pat Radford/HOU/ECT on 04/12/2001 11:00 AM -----

	Kaye Ellis
	04/12/2001 09:03 AM

		 To: pradfor@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: China Letter 2

>
 >
 >

 <<CHINESE2.JPG>>

 - CHINESE2.JPG


Hey Kyle,

Attahed is an updated version of the Entex model.

-Eric


yes

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lawner, Leslie
Sent:	Friday, August 31, 2001 11:36 AM
To:	Steffes, James D.; Benson, Eric; Keene, Patrick; Kingerski, Harry
Subject:	FW: Nevada proceeding, SW advise letter

This outside bill assumes I am acting as Enron attorney and Pat Keene is the witness.  Can this go to the RCR for next week?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Tom Mumaw" <tmumaw@swlaw.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Tom+20Mumaw+22+20+3Ctmumaw+40swlaw+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Friday, August 31, 2001 10:25 AM
To:	Lawner, Leslie
Subject:	Re: Nevada proceeding

I will assume two hours of my time for testimony review and about four hours for Rob Kinas to fly up to Reno and back (I realize this is generous, but I don't know the place schedule or whether he can do any useful work in transit, so I thought I would give you worst case).  That's probably about $1,600 plus expenses.  You could knock off at least two hours if Rob can admit you from the Las Vegas office of the Commission.  Usually the PUCN allows parties to participate via teleconference in Las Vegas if the hearing is in Carson City and vice versa.  It would also save you the airfare and car rental (its cheaper than a cab even if you are only staying in Carson City a short while) for Rob.  However, I urge you and your witness to appear live in Carson City.

P.S.  When did Enron become such a tightwad?


I decided to go a different route.  What do you think?

Kay


Two answers:  1.  Just yourselves.  Sandra has laid in an excessive quantity
of vittles and libations.  2.  Good idea.  Tryiing to launch an effort like
that now would be a nightmare, but after Conoco, we'll have a lot of
organizational work anyway.  Thanks.  df

Kathy Ringblom
06/12/2000 08:54 AM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: two subjects

#1 - Is there anything we can bring Saturday night?

#2 - Regarding the "record retention" problem, I was thinking that when this
Conoco case is over, that might be a good time to go through all of the boxes
we have pulled (probably close to 150) and weed out all of the stuff we don't
need anymore  - which in the case of many of the boxes, may be the entire
contents - instead of sending them all back to storage.  Maybe we could
distribute copies of each department's record retention policy, figure out a
way for the "owner" of the boxes' contents to come into the box room, review
them and make a decision at that time.


=================================================================
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES' CLICK 'N SAVE E-MAIL UPDATE - March 12, 2002
=================================================================

Updated Travel Information with the latest on additional security
checkpoints at Southwest Airlines' Airports.

http://www.southwest.com/travel_center/travelAdvisory.html

=================================================================
DID YOU KNOW?
=================================================================
Southwest Airlines is looking for hardworking, fun-loving folks
to fill immediate job openings.

To find the opening thats right for you please visit us at:
http://www.southwest.com/careers?src=e031202

=================================================================
SOUTHWEST.COM NEWS ON THE FLY
=================================================================
1. southwest.com Click 'n Save Internet Specials
2. Systemwide specials from $39 to $99
3. Select markets for $34 each way
4. Friends Fly Free - Long Island/Islip, NY to/from Providence, RI
5. Take advantage of Best Westerns BestRates(R) promotion
6. Subscriber Information

=================================================================
southwest.com Click 'n Save Internet Specials
=================================================================
Albany, NY
 $65 one-way, to/from Raleigh-Durham, NC

Albuquerque, NM
 $87 one-way, to/from Las Vegas, NV

Amarillo, TX
 $34 one-way, to/from Dallas Love Field, TX
 $84 one-way, to/from Houston Bush Intercontinental, TX
 $84 one-way, to/from Houston Hobby, TX

Austin, TX
 $34 one-way, to/from Dallas Love Field, TX
 $34 one-way, to/from Harlingen/South Padre Island, TX
 $34 one-way, to/from Houston Hobby, TX
 $34 one-way, to/from Midland/Odessa, TX

Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
 $84 one-way, to/from Jacksonville, FL

Birmingham, AL
 $71 one-way, to/from St. Louis, MO
 $61 one-way, to/from Tampa Bay, FL

Boise, ID
 $72 one-way, to/from Las Vegas, NV

Buffalo/Niagara Falls, NY
 $83 one-way, to/from Nashville, TN

Burbank, CA
 $57 one-way, to/from Tucson, AZ

Chicago Midway, IL
 $76 one-way, to/from Long Island/Islip, NY

Cleveland, OH
 $59 one-way, to/from Indianapolis, IN

Columbus, OH
 $82 one-way, to/from Hartford, CT/Springfield, MA
 $84 one-way, to/from Providence, RI

Corpus Christi, TX
 $66 one-way, to/from Dallas Love Field, TX
 $34 one-way, to/from Houston Hobby, TX

Dallas Love Field, TX
 $34 one-way, to/from Amarillo, TX
 $34 one-way, to/from Austin, TX
 $66 one-way, to/from Corpus Christi, TX
 $82 one-way, to/from Harlingen/South Padre Island, TX
 $34 one-way, to/from Houston Bush Intercontinental, TX
 $34 one-way, to/from Houston Hobby, TX
 $34 one-way, to/from Little Rock, AR
 $34 one-way, to/from Lubbock, TX
 $34 one-way, to/from Midland/Odessa, TX
 $34 one-way, to/from Oklahoma City, OK
 $34 one-way, to/from Tulsa, OK

Detroit, MI
 $59 one-way, to/from Louisville, KY

El Paso, TX
 $86 one-way, to/from Las Vegas, NV

Ft. Lauderdale/Hollywood, FL
 $70 one-way, to/from Norfolk, VA/Southern Virginia

Harlingen/South Padre Island, TX
 $34 one-way, to/from Austin, TX
 $82 one-way, to/from Dallas Love Field, TX
 $34 one-way, to/from Houston Hobby, TX
 $34 one-way, to/from San Antonio, TX

Hartford, CT/Springfield, MA
 $82 one-way, to/from Columbus, OH

Houston Bush Intercontinental, TX
 $84 one-way, to/from Amarillo, TX
 $34 one-way, to/from Dallas Love Field, TX

Houston Hobby, TX
 $84 one-way, to/from Amarillo, TX
 $34 one-way, to/from Austin, TX
 $34 one-way, to/from Corpus Christi, TX
 $34 one-way, to/from Dallas Love Field, TX
 $34 one-way, to/from Harlingen/South Padre Island, TX
 $34 one-way, to/from San Antonio, TX

Indianapolis, IN
 $59 one-way, to/from Cleveland, OH

Jackson, MS
 $78 one-way, to/from San Antonio, TX

Jacksonville, FL
 $84 one-way, to/from Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD

Kansas City, MO
 $68 one-way, to/from Little Rock, AR

Las Vegas, NV
 $87 one-way, to/from Albuquerque, NM
 $72 one-way, to/from Boise, ID
 $86 one-way, to/from El Paso, TX

Little Rock, AR
 $34 one-way, to/from Dallas Love Field, TX
 $68 one-way, to/from Kansas City, MO
 $61 one-way, to/from Tulsa, OK

Long Island/Islip, NY
 $76 one-way, to/from Chicago Midway, IL

Los Angeles, CA
 $64 one-way, to/from Reno/Tahoe, NV

Louisville, KY
 $59 one-way, to/from Detroit, MI

Lubbock, TX
 $34 one-way, to/from Dallas Love Field, TX
 $78 one-way, to/from Oklahoma City, OK

Manchester, NH
 $70 one-way, to/from Norfolk, VA/Southern Virginia

Midland/Odessa, TX
 $34 one-way, to/from Austin, TX
 $34 one-way, to/from Dallas Love Field, TX

Nashville, TN
 $83 one-way, to/from Buffalo/Niagara Falls, NY
 $75 one-way, to/from Omaha, NE
 $79 one-way, to/from Orlando, FL

New Orleans, LA
 $81 one-way, to/from San Antonio, TX

Norfolk, VA/Southern Virginia
 $70 one-way, to/from Ft. Lauderdale/Hollywood, FL
 $70 one-way, to/from Manchester, NH

Oakland, CA
 $78 one-way, to/from Phoenix, AZ
 $65 one-way, to/from Seattle/Tacoma, WA

Oklahoma City, OK
 $34 one-way, to/from Dallas Love Field, TX
 $78 one-way, to/from Lubbock, TX

Omaha, NE
 $75 one-way, to/from Nashville, TN

Ontario, CA
 $70 one-way, to/from Salt Lake City, UT

Orlando, FL
 $79 one-way, to/from Nashville, TN

Phoenix, AZ
 $78 one-way, to/from Oakland, CA

Portland, OR
 $62 one-way, to/from San Jose, CA

Providence, RI
 $84 one-way, to/from Columbus, OH

Raleigh-Durham, NC
 $65 one-way, to/from Albany, NY
 $70 one-way, to/from West Palm Beach, FL

Reno/Tahoe, NV
 $64 one-way, to/from Los Angeles, CA

Sacramento, CA
 $74 one-way, to/from Spokane, WA

Salt Lake City, UT
 $70 one-way, to/from Ontario, CA
 $76 one-way, to/from San Diego, CA
 $68 one-way, to/from Spokane, WA

San Antonio, TX
 $34 one-way, to/from Harlingen/South Padre Island, TX
 $34 one-way, to/from Houston Hobby, TX
 $78 one-way, to/from Jackson, MS
 $81 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA

San Diego, CA
 $76 one-way, to/from Salt Lake City, UT

San Jose, CA
 $62 one-way, to/from Portland, OR

Seattle/Tacoma, WA
 $65 one-way, to/from Oakland, CA

Spokane, WA
 $74 one-way, to/from Sacramento, CA
 $68 one-way, to/from Salt Lake City, UT

St. Louis, MO
 $71 one-way, to/from Birmingham, AL

Tampa Bay, FL
 $61 one-way, to/from Birmingham, AL

Tucson, AZ
 $57 one-way, to/from Burbank, CA

Tulsa, OK
 $34 one-way, to/from Dallas Love Field, TX
 $61 one-way, to/from Little Rock, AR

West Palm Beach, FL
 $70 one-way, to/from Raleigh-Durham, NC

For complete information, please visit:
http://www.southwest.com/jp/hotfares2.shtml?src=e031202

=================================================================
IMPORTANT DETAILS
=================================================================
*Available only on southwest.com.
*21-day advance purchase required.
*Available on published, scheduled service.
*Fares shown are one-way and do not include federal
 excise tax of $3.00 for each flight segment.
 (a segment is defined as a takeoff and landing)
*Fares do not include airport-assessed passenger facility
 charges (PFC) of up to $9 and government-imposed September 11th
 Security Fee of up to $5 one-way.
*Fares are nonrefundable, but (except for tickets
 purchased through our Group Tickets Program)
 may be applied toward future travel on Southwest Airlines.
*Travel April 2, 2002 through August 3, 2002, except May 24
 and 27, and July 7, 2002.
*Purchase through March 14, 2002,  midnight Pacific Time.
*Fares are available one-way or can be combined
 with other fare types.  Most restrictive rules of combined
 fares will apply.
*Penalty applies to any changes made after purchasing
 Southwest Internet Specials.
*Orange County, CA not included in this sale.

For more details, please visit us at:
http://www.southwest.com/jp/hotfares2.shtml?src=e031202

=================================================================
SYSTEMWIDE SPECIALS FROM $39 TO $99
=================================================================
Promotional fares from $39 to $99 for travel Tuesday, Wednesday,
or Saturday.  Fares may be higher for travel Monday, Thursday,
Friday, or Sunday.

*7-day advance purchase required.
*Travel March 19, 2002 through August 3, 2002.
*Purchase March 12, 2002 through March 18, 2002, midnight
 Pacific Time.
*Fare is each way with roundtrip purchase.
*Fare does not include a federal excise tax of $3.00 per takeoff
 and landing.
*Fare does not include airport-assessed passenger facility
 charges (PFC) of up to $18 and government-imposed September 11th
 Security Fee of up to $10 roundtrip.

For more details, please visit us at:
http://www.southwest.com/hotfares/genmkt_030102.html#promo?src=e031202

=================================================================
SELECT MARKETS FOR $34 EACH WAY
=================================================================
*7-day advance purchase required.
*Fare is valid for travel 7 days a week.
*Travel March 19, 2002 through August 3, 2002.
*Purchase March 12, 2002 through May 18, 2002, midnight
 Pacific Time.
*Fare is each way with roundtrip purchase.
*Fare does not include a federal excise tax of $3.00 per takeoff
 and landing.
*Fare does not include airport-assessed passenger facility
 charges (PFC) of up to $18 and government-imposed September 11th
 Security Fee of up to $10 roundtrip.

For more details including a complete list of markets,
please visit us at:
http://www.southwest.com/hotfares/genmkt_030102.html#select?src=e031202

=================================================================
FRIENDS FLY FREE
=================================================================
Long Island/Islip, NY to/from Providence, RI for $49 each way
and bring a friend for FREE!

*3-day advance purchase required.
*Travel March 15, 2002 through August 3, 2002.
*Purchase March 12, 2002 through May 23, 2002, midnight
 Pacific Time.
*Fare is each way with roundtrip purchase.
*Fare does not include a federal excise tax of $3.00 per takeoff
 and landing for the fare-paying Customer.
*Fare does not include airport-assessed passenger facility
 charges (PFC) of $6 and government-imposed September 11th
 Security Fee of up to $5 roundtrip, per person.

For more details, please visit us at:
http://www.southwest.com/hotfares/fff.html?src=e031202

=================================================================
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
=================================================================
Additional information you need to know about all of our
air fare specials:

*Changes to any portion of the reservation
 (flight, dates, cities, and/or names of passengers),
 once purchased, will result in the cancellation of
 the ENTIRE reservation and rebooking at the lowest
 fare available which could result in a fare increase.
*Southwest specials are nonchangeable
 and nonrefundable.
*Ticketless Travel may be purchased online using
 either a credit card or by utilizing funds from a
 previously unused or cancelled Ticketless
 Travel reservation(s).  Funds from up to four cancelled
 or unused Ticketless Travel reservation records can
 be combined to purchase a new Ticketless Travel
 reservation record.  Southwest Airlines travel credit
 travel vouchers, gift certificates, and discount coupons)
 may not be used as forms of payment for
 Ticketless Travel Online.
*Unused funds may be applied toward future travel on
 Southwest Airlines within one year of the original purchase date.
*Seats are limited and won't be available on some
 flights that operate during very busy travel times
 and holiday periods such as Presidents Day and Memorial Day.
*Standby travel requires an upgrade to the
 full unrestricted fare.

=================================================================
BEST WESTERN BESTRATES(R) PROMOTION
=================================================================
Itching to take a little trip? Now would be a great time.

With rates so attractive and 2,300 Best Western hotels throughout
North America, you may need an extra suitcase Just to carry home
all the extra souvenirs you'll be buying. Book a Best Western
room by March 31, 2002 to take advantage of our BestRates(R)
promotion.

For more details, please visit us at:
http://www.southwest.com/hotfares/hotfares_hotels.html?src=e031202

=================================================================
SUBSCRIBER INFORMATION
=================================================================
Please pass this great news on to your friends.
To subscribe to Southwest Airlines Click 'n Save E-mail
Updates, visit:
http://www.southwest.com/email

Remember, if you change your Internet service provider,
you will need to unsubscribe and resubscribe in order
to continue receiving Click 'n Save E-mail Updates.
For administration of your e-mail subscription, please visit:
http://www.southwest.com/email/emailUnsubscribe.html

=================================================================
You may retrieve and print a copy of your Southwest
Airlines Ticketless Travel at:
http://www.southwest.com/travel_center/retrieveItinerary.html

Questions about your flight arrival or departure time?
Please visit us at:
http://www.southwest.com/cgi-bin/selectFlight

=================================================================

This is a post only mailing from Southwest Airlines.
Please do not attempt to respond to this message.

Copyright 2002 Southwest Airlines Co. All Rights Reserved.

---
You are currently subscribed to special-offers as: dperlin@enron.com
You can unsubscribe anytime at http://www.southwest.com/email/


Attached for your review are materials for the
December 19,2000 ERCOT Board meeting.

Best regards,

Shari Heino
ERCOT

 - Ag001219.doc
 - Bd001025.doc
 - Bd001121.doc
 - BOD Responsibilities.doc
 - Fee Increase Intervenors12.19.00.doc
 - PIP_Master_List 121200.xls
 - Protocols supplental PUCT filing12.19.00.doc
 - RUG120600Results.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron on 08/10/2000
04:31 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kelly Lombardi                           08/10/2000 04:17 PM

To: Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: RE: Gas Daily Price Notice

Errol,
These are the pubs that I changed August 8th pricing, according to Gas Daily
Price Notice:

GD-TRCOZ6/NY $4.975 changed to $4.965
GDP-PG&E/LG-PKG $4.215 changed to $4.285

If you have any questions, please call me x5-8491.
Thanks-
Kelly


If you need anything further, please call me at extension 53218.

Thanks,

Jessica


FYI, following-up on this matter, after discussing the matter with their
counsel and confronted with a $3.5MM lawsuit, Lakeside acknowledged the deal
and executed our paper.  Regards, Peter.
---------------------- Forwarded by Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT on 05/11/2001 01:25
PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources
	Canada Corp.

	From:  Peter Keohane                           04/30/2001 10:26 AM

To: James Derrick/Enron@EnronXGate, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B
Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Johnston/CAL/ECT@ECT, Sharon
Crawford/CAL/ECT@ECT
Subject: Litigation Counsel Approval - Lakeside Packers

We have a counterparty (Lakeside Packers) who refuses to perform to a 5 year
fixed for floating power swap which commenced Jan. 01 and is C$2.5MM
(US$1.7MM) in the money to us and booked (we would take a hit to earnings by
that amount to unwind the deal).  Unfortunately, without the involvement of
Legal, the deal was executed without paper, but on the basis that it was
subject to our standard ISDA documentation.  The Confirm was sent out on that
basis but not executed by the counterparty.  There was some agreement on
guarantee support, but as this was less clear to get the underlying deal put
in place, with the approval of Credit, we gave up the requirement for the
guarantee in our subsequent discussions and demand letter.

We want to pursue the matter by commencing litigation.

Lakeside is traditionally represented by Blakes.

My suggestion would be to use the Duncan McCachen firm, a litigation boutique
who we have used in the past (CIBC litigation).  Mike McCachen has a good
understanding of the trading business for a litigation lawyer.
Alternatively, I would suggest Clarke Hunter of Macleod Dixon who is
currently representing us on the NGX litigation and who also has a good
understanding of out trading business.  Mike is a little more aggressive than
Clarke, to my preference.

We would like to proceed as soon as possible as our demand letter expired
last week, and our calls this morning were not dealt with satisfactorily.

Peter.


Just got off the phone with Rick Hawley--Puget's CFO.  He was very cordial and indicated the company was interested in talking with us.  We had a fairly open discussion of who we should contact.  In the end, he suggested that we call Bill Gaines, VP Energy Supply.  He said that as CFO he is head of the Risk Management Committee and that anything that was discussed with Bill would go through his committee.  I highlighted the notion that we were interested in talking about services that could be helpful to their risk management efforts and that would be beneficial to both of our companies.

By the way, at the beginning of the call, I made clear that we were not talking about total outsourcing.

He didn't immediately respond, but in the context of our discussion re:  who to talk to he stated that we should talk to him if we wanted to have a more strategic discussion on outsourcing.  Then he said something to the effect of "of course, we're not at all interested in a more comprehensive outsourcing product."

Bill's number is 425.462.3145.  He said that we can tell Bill, Rick suggested we call him directly.


dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com on 03/16/2000 10:53:20 AM
To: "        -         *steve.gillespie@enron.com" <steve.gillespie@enron.com>
cc: "        -         *Porter, Jeffrey" <jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com>,
"        -         *Perrone, Brian" <bperron@columbiaenergygroup.com>, Chris
Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: NIPSCO Choice

Steve--The attached file contains estimates for the upcoming 12-month period
of
our monthly flowing volume requirements for the NIPSCO Choice program,
including estimated peak-day requirements (part of which come out of
storage).   I am referring to the values in Cols. L,M, and N in the attached.
Can you please give us a price quote for getting these volumes to the NIPSCO
citygate?

Please call me if you have questions.

Thanks.

Doug Kinney
Ph:  703-561-6339
Fax:  703-561-7317

 - NIPSCO Choice Est Vol Reqs.xls


Dear Evening MBA Students,

Beginning Tuesday, 9/26, Multex will be available off-campus. Multex
provides industry and company reports from a variety of analysts. I think
you will like this database. It is available from Long Library's website
(http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/BUSI) under Electronic Resources towards the
top right of the page.

Monica Singh
Evening MBA Librarian


I left Kent a message, suggesting that we start with COA, telling him ENA is
the assignee.  I'll let you know when I hear from him.

Kay

From: Stuart Zisman@ECT on 11/16/2000 11:35 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Break contracts/Priority setting

Just as we discussed.  Thanks


All,

Below is a resume of Manuel.  I met with him and has a good background and is
a superior performer.  He is willing to locate from Manilla and would go to
Sydney and Tokyo.  Interesting origination oppt.

Mike

List
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT on 05/23/2001
12:36 PM ---------------------------

Manuel Gallego@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
05/23/2001 08:21 AM
To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Christopher B Hunt/Enron@EnronXGate
Subject: Thank You

Dear Mike,

Thank you for taking the time to meet with me this afternoon in spite of your
busy schedule.  Your encouragement is appreciated, especially in light of the
uncertainties resulting from the substantial shift in Enron's business
paradigm.  I look forward to communicating with the individuals you
suggested--in particular, Randy Maffett, Per Seska, Mark Tawney, and Eric
Gonzales.

As you requested, attached below is my resume.

Best regards,
Manuel


Attachments from Joe Hartsoe can be opened in view format.

----- Forwarded by Bernadette Hawkins/Corp/Enron on 01/16/2001 11:47 AM -----

	Donna Fulton
	01/16/2001 11:45 AM

		 To: Bernadette Hawkins/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject:


To Colleagues:

Here is the latest version as of 2:00 pm.

David

 - Manifesto-final version.doc
======================================
David J. Teece, Director
Institute of Management, Innovation and Organization
F402 Haas School of Business #1930
University of California, Berkeley
Berkeley, CA  94720-1930
Phone:  (510) 642-1075
Fax:  (510) 642-2826
http://haas.berkeley.edu/~imio
======================================


Have you seen these?

----- Forwarded by Mark Whitt/NA/Enron on 05/30/2001 10:44 AM -----

	"Terry McHendry" <tmchendry@cmsenergy.com> 05/24/2001 03:49 PM 	   To: mwhitt@enron.com  cc:   Subject: Revised Letter Agreement for Released Capacity

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Terry McHendry/GTS/CMS on 05/24/2001
04:50 PM ---------------------------

Jerry Shrader
05/23/2001 05:02 PM

To:   gerald.nemec@enron.com
cc:   Terry McHendry/GTS/CMS@CMS
Subject:  Revised Letter Agreement for Released Capacity

As we discussed, attached is a draft of the Letter Agreement which contains
our proposed revisions (it should appear in black-lined format).  Sorry for
my delay in responding.  Hopefully, this gets us close.  Thanks for your
help.

(See attached file: CMS Capacity Release Letter 5-23-01.doc)

 - CMS Capacity Release Letter 5-23-01.doc


Juanster,
Can I get a copy of your group's expectations?    I need to also discuss with you the duties of all the night guys.    As I understand it,     they  all pitch in to do confirms and they unofficially cross-train in other regions.     What about reconciliation reports - what is required?   What other reports need to be tied out -  the Sched Activity report vs. the P&L sheet?

JMF


-----Original Message-----
From: bill ross [mailto:billross1@myexcel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:28 AM
To: Hyatt, Kevin
Subject: Excel Communications

Pursuant to our conversation, please review the attachment.  As I mentioned, I do Excel full-time now; I no longer practice law.  That gives me the time to work with new representatives to make sure their businesses get off to solid starts.  My office number is (713)737-3158, and my mobile is (281)989-0498.  I look forward to speaking with you soon.

Bill Ross


Everyone,

Carla Hoffman informed me on Friday that she has accepted another position
outside the company.    I would like to thank her for all she has done for
Enron West Power over the years and wish her the best on her new endeavors.

Thanks,
Jeff Richter
Short Term California Desk