We should definitely bring him in for an interview.

	From:  Lexi Elliott                           02/09/2001 09:04 AM

To: Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Mark E Lindsey/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Mike Deville/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally
Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Summer Internship

This candidate is currently working in Houston.  Since our schedules are full
on-campus, it would be very easy to bring him in-house for interviews.
Please let me know if you are interested.

Thank you,

Lexi

---------------------- Forwarded by Lexi Elliott/NA/Enron on 02/09/2001 09:09
AM ---------------------------

Judd Eisenberg <judde@mail.utexas.edu> on 02/06/2001 01:11:05 AM
To: lexi.elliott@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Summer Internship

Lexi Elliot,

Hi, my name is Judd Eisenberg, and I am a business student at the
University of Texas who is seeking the summer analyst internship at Enron.
I received an opportunity to meet you at a reception dinner that Enron
hosted last semester in Austin.  I have always been intrigued with the
analyst and associate rotational programs that Enron offers.  The courses I
take in school, accounting and particularly finance, my extensive job
experience, and my leadership positions have provided me with valuable
skills for the summer analyst position.  I have a good friend at UT who
will start working full-time for Enron in the IT division in a few months,
and I know he is truly looking forward to the challenges and opportunities
that Enron provides.  Because I am currently interning with
PricewaterhouseCoopers in Houston, I am not able to go through the
recruiting process at the university.  I am sending an attachment of my
resume in this e-mail since I am going to be in Houston until mid-March.
Please e-mail me if there are any openings for the position I am seeking or
if you have any questions. I look forward to hearing from you soon.

Thanks,

Judd Eisenberg

 - Job Resume00-01.rtf


<<TITAN-GREEN -- option.DOC>>

Kay:
Per my conversation with Rusty, attached hereto is the electronic version of
the Titan-Green Option Agreement for execution by Titan.  This version is
the same document we discussed last Thurday and incorporates those
substitution pages sent to you by fax at 2:50 on June 9, 2000.  Per my fax
to you earlier today, the Optionor has executed the Option and forwarded the
signature page to me.  Therefore:

1.  Please execute FOUR (4) original copies of the Option.
2.  Please fax me the signature page 312-630-6347
3.  Please send to my attention by federal express all FOUR (4) original
executed documents.

Upon receipt I will forward two originals to the Seller, who will then send
me two original documents.  Please call with any questions 312-368-2152.
Thanks!

____________________________________________________________________________
The e-mail address and domain name of the sender changed on November 1,
1999.  Please update your records.

The information contained in this communication may be confidential, is
intended only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be legally
privileged.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please re-send this communication to
the sender and delete the original message and any copy of it from your
computer system.
Thank you.

For more information about Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe, please visit us at
http://www.piperrudnick.com/
____________________________________________________________________________

 - TITAN-GREEN -- option.DOC


You've gone out of your way for them, and  I think it would be a nice touch
to send you a goodie!

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	06/07/2001 03:18 PM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Jacoby

At the very least, the cancellation charges are theirs.

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 06/07/2001 03:14 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Jacoby

Exactly what I told Lorie (send her a gift certificate for a manicure and
pedicure), but she kind of balked.  I'm not sure of her taste.  It'll be
interesting to see what they send you.  Let me know.

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	06/07/2001 03:07 PM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Jacoby

Works for me.  We are leaving to check in to the hotel, then back.  I had to
cancel manicure/pedicure ( and charged for it)  A hint that a gift
certificate for same would work might be appropriate.

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 06/07/2001 02:56 PM
To: kay.mann@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Jacoby

Jacoby's assistant just called and wanted your home address.  Apparently Ben
is going to send you something or someone (manicurist/pedicurist) to your
home.  I told her you liked champagne too if he wanted to get you a beverage
and also that you would be leaving to go celebrate your daughter's birthday a
little later this afternoon.  I didn't want them sending out someone and you
not be there.  I can see you now with the phone in one hand and a manicurist
on the other or better yet, a glass of bubbly!


To all who keep responding to this message.....

Please only reply to the original requester!!!  DO NOT HIT REPLY TO ALL!!
You are sending your reply to Enron worldwide.  That means you are sending
your reply to everyone who works for Enron.  Please only reply to the
original sender.

Thanks!
Jonathan Anderson


---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 08/02/2000 10:46
AM ---------------------------

"Zerilli, Frank" <fzerilli@POWERMERCHANTS.COM> on 08/01/2000 02:58:03 PM
To: "Kelly, Joseph" <jkelly@POWERMERCHANTS.COM>, "Marcotte, Tom"
<TMarcotte@POWERMERCHANTS.COM>, "Lynch, Justin" <jlynch@POWERMERCHANTS.COM>,
"Fioriello, John" <JFioriello@POWERMERCHANTS.COM>, "Dennis, Robert"
<rdennis@POWERMERCHANTS.COM>, "Glynn,Kevin" <kglynn@POWERMERCHANTS.COM>,
"Leo, Andre" <aleo@POWERMERCHANTS.COM>, "Sergides, Melissa"
<MSergides@POWERMERCHANTS.COM>, "Bill Horton (E-mail)" <bhorton@tnsk.com>,
"Lew G. Williams (E-mail)" <Lew_G._Williams@aep.com>, "Lew G. Williams
(E-mail 2)" <bak2texas@msn.com>, "Christine Zerilli (E-mail)"
<Christine_Zerilli@lotus.com>, "Sharon C. Zerilli (E-mail)"
<szerilli@optonline.net>, "Stacey & Dave Hoey (E-mail)" <sah51099@cs.com>,
"Jeannine & Rob Votruba (E-mail)" <votruba@worldnet.att.net>, "Pat Creem
(E-mail)" <pcreem@hotmail.com>, "josh Faber (E-mail)"
<joshfaber@hotmail.com>, "Jason D'alessandro (E-mail)" <jsd77@altavista.com>,
"David D'alessandro (E-mail)" <DDALESSA@SEMPRATRADING.COM>, "Eric Carlstrom
(E-mail)" <Eric_Carlstrom@ars.aon.com>, "Sean Jacobs (E-mail)"
<jakey@peoplepc.com>
cc: "'jarnold@enron.com'" <jarnold@enron.com>
Subject: baby

 baby

 - baby.mpg


I don't need to talk shit about the game.  I will let the Longhorns do the
talking for me on Saturday.

By the way,  you can probably see your reflection in that surfboard by now.

To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chad Landry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew
Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, val.generes@ac.com
cc:
Subject: CWS

Excerpt from Baseball America on 2000 CWS.

Bass, give it up.  You are done.

The Tigers wear the mantle of favorite well. They have won
                    nine straight games in postseason play, including the
Southeastern
                    Conference tournament. They are relatively healthy. They
have power
                    hitters, they have patient hitters, and they can field
better than recent
                    versions of the club. Best of all, they have a lot of
arms, and they have
                    Bertman around to use them.


The testing on this starts tommorrow.  Please make sure that this is done
today.

Thanks
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT on 12/14/2000
10:47 AM ---------------------------

Dawn C Kenne
12/13/2000 04:50 PM
To: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Torrey Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tara Sweitzer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Physical Trader Matrix

I am sending the physical trader matrix for another update from risk.  I have
added a column called 'Sitara Risk Assignment Desk' and populated the cells
in yellow with what Sitara uses now when assigning hedges.

Please update the list with the Sitara Risk Assignment Desk and also review
the cells I populated to ensure accuracy.

Thank you for all of your help.  Let me know if you have any further
questions.

Dawn
3-9353


George,

We shall be able to accommodate one or two extra people
in the first round.

We shall be glad to repeat the seminars starting soon for a
bigger group. We would like to learn form experience how to run
it.

By the way, we had an option training for EES (roughly 150 people,
over a few weeks). I can give you the materials and
we can repeat it if you think it's useful.

Vince

George Hopley
01/05/2001 09:01 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: 1ST CHAPTER OF TRAINING BOOK

Vince - I had heard about this derivatives class from Clayton
and I am inquiring about the possibility of someone outside
of the Research Group being able to attend.  If so, I would
like the opportunity.  Let me know if it is possible.

Thanks,
George

Shirley Crenshaw@ECT
01/05/2001 07:58 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pinnamaneni
Krishnarao/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vasant Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike A
Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph Hrgovcic/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya
Tamarchenko/HOU/ECT@ECT, Zimin Lu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martin Lin/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Maureen Raymond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Osman Sezgen/HOU/EES@EES, Paulo
Issler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amitava Dhar/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Alex
Huang/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Kindall/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin G
Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clayton Vernon/Corp/Enron@ENRON, William
Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jose Marquez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Chonawee
Supatgiat/Corp/Enron@Enron, Shalesh Ganjoo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Halliburton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Elena Chilkina/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sevil
Yaman/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sofya Tamarchenko/NA/Enron@Enron, Bob
Lee/NA/Enron@Enron, Gwyn Koepke/NA/Enron@Enron, Hector Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Anita DuPont/NA/Enron@ENRON, Youyi Feng/NA/Enron@Enron, V Charles
Weldon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Praveen Mellacheruvu/HOU/EES@EES, Li Sun/NA/Enron@Enron,
Stephen Bennett/NA/Enron@ENRON, Roman Zadorozhny/HOU/EES@EES, Lance
Cunningham/NA/Enron@ENRON, Leann Walton/NA/Enron@ENRON, Shane
Green/HOU/EES@EES, Seksan Kiatsupaibul/HOU/EES@EES, Kate Lucas/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Nelson Neale/NA/Enron@Enron, Rabi De/NA/Enron@ENRON, Kenneth
Parkhill/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jaesoo Lew/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jason
Sokolov/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Bigalow/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom
Barkley/NA/Enron@Enron, Rakesh Bharati/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: 1ST CHAPTER OF TRAINING BOOK

Good morning everyone:

Here is the much anticipated copy of the 1st chapter of the training book
"Energy Derivatives".

As previously stated the training will begin on Friday, January 19th from
11:30 - 1:00 in 30C1and every first and third Friday thereafter in 49C1.

If you have any questions, please let me know.

Thanks and have a great day!

Shirley


My understanding is that we used to have investments.  I don't think this group still exists.  I believe this is back when we had Solarex.  The only investment that I'm aware of is the Fuel Cell Energy investment.

Stacey Bolton
Environmental Strategies
Enron Corp
713-853-9916 direct
713-303-2632 cell
sbolton@enron.com <mailto:sbolton@enron.com>

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ring, Richard
Sent:	Wednesday, August 22, 2001 9:01 AM
To:	Bolton, Stacey
Subject:	Greetings

Stacey,

What, if anything do you know about Enron's investment in twelve (12) different alternative energy companies?

Richard

---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Ring/HOU/EES on 08/22/2001 09:00 AM ---------------------------

Krista Kisch
07/30/2001 12:12 PM
To:	Richard Ring/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject:	Greetings

Hello, Richard:

We met a couple of months ago.   I was working with Bill Hatch in Boston, MA; I am now with the Product Management group in Houston.  I was wondering if there are any new developments regarding Enron-Renewable Energy ventures.  I read that Enron has invested in 12 different alternative energy companies (which was news to me).

Hope that you are well.

Kind regards / Krista Kisch
Tel: (713) 345-8640

<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>


Disegard previous e-mail.
We  reached a conceptual agreement with the government representatives on Sunday night.  The main points are:

     1. Rationing losses:   Defined methodology giving distribution companies recovery over the next 36 months of rationing losses realised   from June 01 until the end of rationing in 02. Recovery includes financial compensation. Immediate funding of 80% through BNDES, with Brazilian government funds. Loans liquidated over the 3 year period as tariff increases are realised.  Funding scheduled by December 15th.  Elektro Ebitda impact of approximately R$163 million or US$ 63 million. Corrected numbers in second email

       2.  April/May MAE settlement :   Market will settle under current rules due to pre-rationing conditions, confirming the procedures used on Elektro's books.  Impact of approximately R$ 18 million or US$ 7 million.

       3.  Parcel  "A" for the future:  All non-controlable costs to which LDC's are subjected to including power purchases, sector charges, are passed through to final tariffs either using a tracking account mechanism or by aligning adjustment dates with  the LDC tariff revision date.  Tracking account will be subject to financial compensation from the date costs are incurred until the effective pass through and collection , eliminating a major risk for the distribution sector. Elektro Ebitda impact  2002 forward of R$ 60 million or US$ 19 million, as had been considered in the 2002 plan.  This methodology represents major risk mitigation going forward, as the initial power supply contracts are renewed starting in 2003.

        4. Parcel A from the past:   Min Parente has agreed to the concept recovering non controllable  that were not passed through to tariffs since late 1999 using the same methodology agreed to for future recoveries and has a dedicated team from the Federal Attorney General's office targeting a final solution in ten days.    Elektro impact  is R$145 million or US$ 55 million in 2001. The proposed mechanism for recovery is after the 36 months for the rationing losses.

We are currently finalising a memo of understanding and the government team is winding up the settlement with the generators in order to finalize the terms of the overall agreement.

Min Parente has committed to resolving the open issues affecting investors in the power sector.  These  agreements represent a major step forward, significantly improving  the value of our businesses. By  solving the pending issues for the rationing losses, thus eliminating the Annex 5 controversy the MAE should function normally, allowing us to operate Eletrobolt and settle against the pool.

Total amounts for the sector represent about R$ 10 billion or US$3.8 billion at the current rates.  Our team has led the sector negotiations for months since the rationing, and have been instrumental in convincing the government of the need for implementing these changes.


Vance,

Deal # 420022 has been created and entered in Sitara.

Bob

Vance L Taylor
09/28/2000 02:09 PM
To: Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: October Wellhead

Bob,

Please create and enter into sitara a ticket based on the following
information:

Counterparty    Meter   Volume   Price    Period

Heatherloch Municipal Utility District 6879   500mmbtu/d   100% IF/HSC less
$0.12  10/1 - 10/31

Julie Meyers
09/28/2000 10:52 AM

Daren J Farmer
09/28/2000 07:41 AM


Start Date: 4/2/01; HourAhead hour: 20;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001040220.txt
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: Crawler lifetime exceeded.
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database


I go away for a day and come back to yet another $40 million of PGE exposure.
I guess the lesson is to not go away. Where does this end? This is a painful
way to learn about derivative credit exposure. Please inform all "deal doers"
at EES that they better have RAC review their deals (Mercury) in detail
before they sign. This is more out of control than anything else we have at
Enron.

 Rick


The Emergency Call-Out List is on the attached Excel file:
"EmerCallList.XLS" and is being sent to all #1's and #2's in the escalation
order.  The complete list is ten pages and includes in the following order:

 Page 1-3 Enron Building
 Page 4-5 Three Allen Center
 Page 6  600 Jefferson
 Page 7   Enron Hanger
 Page 8  Navigation Warehouse
 Page 9   Ardmore Building
 Page 10 Shepherd Warehouse

Future updates will be sent around the 1st of each month.

Note:  It is the responsibility of those individuals listed on the Emergency
Call-Out List to verify the information and advise me via cc:Mail or
NotesMail ONLY of any phone number or contact name changes.  Include the line
number corresponding to the requested change(s).  PLEASE  DO NOT forward a
corrected sheet to me.

Thank you for your co-operation.  If you have any questions or comments,
please call Randy Lord at ext. 5-7707 or send cc:Mail/NotesMail messages.


With respect to Deutsche Bank (""DB"), we have one credit issue remaining, DB
would like us to add all the Enron trading entities DB trades with as
Specified Entities under the ISDA Master Agreement and we are somewhat
hesitant to do so, as this could potentially roll up swaps under structured
loan transactions into a default under the ISDA Agreement.  Sara and Bill
Bradford in Credit are supposed to talk to the DB Credit people about this
remaining issue.

With respect to First Union National Bank, the draft we were working from was
so old that they agreed to look at our current form of agreement which was
sent to them on 11/8/00 for review.  Sara is working on that with Susan
Bailey, another paralegal in our Group.

	Denis O'Connell
	11/22/2000 06:05 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Richard Sage/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: ISDA Master Agreements

Tana - can you please give me an update on where you are in the negotiations
of the ISDA with the following counterparties and confirm which Enron entity
you are negotiating on behalf of.

Tks,

Denis

First Union National Bank

Deutsched Bank AG


(See attached file: ng050902.pdf)

This message and any attachments (the "message") is
intended solely for the addressees and is confidential.
If you receive this message in error, please delete it and
immediately notify the sender. Any use not in accord with
its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole
or partial, is prohibited except formal approval. The internet
can not guarantee the integrity of this message.
BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not
therefore be liable for the message if modified.

                ---------------------------------------------

Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le
"message") sont etablis a l'intention exclusive de ses
destinataires et sont confidentiels. Si vous recevez ce
message par erreur, merci de le detruire et d'en avertir
immediatement l'expediteur. Toute utilisation de ce
message non conforme a sa destination, toute diffusion
ou toute publication, totale ou partielle, est interdite, sauf
autorisation expresse. L'internet ne permettant pas
d'assurer l'integrite de ce message, BNP PARIBAS (et ses
filiales) decline(nt) toute responsabilite au titre de ce
message, dans l'hypothese ou il aurait ete modifie.


Mark,

What am I missing on the interpretation?

Thank you,

Dave

From:  Ted Murphy
13/11/2000 16:58

To: David Redmond/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT, Peter
Crilly/LON/ECT@ECT, Richard Lewis/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: issue w/compliance ertificate

The answer on question 1, according to our usual interpretation, is yes - you
may trade equities.
The answer on question 2, according to our usual interpretation, is no - you
should not trade Brent Futures.
Ted

David Redmond
11/13/2000 08:21 AM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter
Crilly/LON/ECT@ECT, Richard Lewis/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: issue w/compliance ertificate

Mark,

I am not sure I follow this but I will attempt to present my interpretation
of your note.

I am only restrained from trading those items in clause one if I am
responsible for trading them at Enron, and "equities" falls under
"securities" in clause one.
"Equities" fall under clause one and are therefore not included in clause
two. Therefore, since I do not trade equities for Enron, I can trade them on
my personal account.

Brent Crude futures, I would argue, are "financial instruments," included in
clause one. I am not responsible for trading them for Enron. If they fall
under clause one they are not included in clause two. Does this mean, since
they are not in clause two and I do not trade them for Enron, I can trade
them on my personal account?

Perhaps you could give me a call, +44 207 783 4928.

Thank you,

Dave

From: Mark Taylor on 10/11/2000 15:56 CST
To: Cassandra Schultz/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: David Redmond/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT, Peter
Crilly/LON/ECT@ECT, Richard Lewis/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: issue w/compliance ertificate

This issue was much easier when all we traded were energy commodities,
interest rates and currencies. The older versions of the policy provided that
no Enron employee may trade any energy commodity for the account of anyone
other than Enron.  Beyond that, no Enron employee could trade a commodity
which was within their area of responsibility.  For example, I was not
permitted to trade natural gas futures for my own account but, since interest
rates and currencies are not within my area of responsibility, I could trade
them.  As the scope of our trading activities expanded it became more
difficult to identify the scope of the company's concern, much less to
articulate it.  We did however take a stab at it and the result is below.
This may be an area which could stand some clarification in the next version
of the Policy.

For now, I would suggest that the term "security" highlighted below should be
read to include equities and therefore not one of the commodities covered in
the second numbered clause (i.e. the word "other" refers to items other than
those listed in clause (i)).  The result is that an Enron employee who does
not trade financial instruments, securities, financial assets or liabilities
for Enron may trade them for his or her own personal account.  To take this a
step further, one could argue that an employee who trades the equities of
energy companies for Enron should not trade energy company equities for his
or her own account but could trade other equities - if it were me, I would
certainly make sure that Ted Murphy agreed with my analysis before I did it.
Of course, a wide variety of commodities remain clearly off limits for
personal trading - metals, ag commodities, bandwidth, freight, lumber, among
many others - for all employees.  As I remember it, this was done purposely
and if anyone disagrees with the scope of the policy they would be wise to
discuss the matter with the RAC Group as they make suggestions for Policy
revisions to the Enron Corp. board.

Employee Trading.  No employee of any Enron Business Unit may engage in the
trading of any Position for the benefit of any party other than an Enron
Business Unit (whether for their own account or for the account of any third
party) where such Position relates to (i) any financial instrument, security,
financial asset or liability which falls within such employee,s
responsibility at an Enron Business Unit or (ii) any other commodity,
included in any Commodity Group.

	Cassandra Schultz@ENRON
	11/08/2000 08:32 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: David Redmond/LON/ECT@ECT, Richard Lewis/LON/ECT@ECT, Peter
Crilly/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: issue w/compliance ertificate

To: Mark Taylor,  Legal counsel for Market Risk Management

Mark - would you please clarify this issue for us?

Thank you,
Cassandra Schultz.
---------------------- Forwarded by Cassandra Schultz/NA/Enron on 11/08/2000
08:26 AM ---------------------------

David Redmond@ECT
11/08/2000 03:05 AM
To: Cassandra Schultz/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Araceli Romero/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Lewis/LON/ECT@ECT, Peter
Crilly/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: 3rd Request - RESPONSE NEEDED ASAP - Risk Mgmt. Compliance
Certificate

Cassandra,

Richard asked me to review this document before the traders on the UK Gas
Desk would sign it.

The UK gas desk adheres to all the risk management requirements of this
document. However, in Section VII , Miscellaneous, Employee Trading, the
document would appear to prevent any of us trading equities (amongst other
commodities) on our personal account as Equity Trading is a Commodity Group.
We are unsure if this is the aim of this agreement.

We have asked our compliance officer, Paul Simons to clarify the impact of
this clause for us.

We are not ignoring the document, we are waiting for clarification.

Thank you,

David Redmond


----- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 03/30/2001 03:46 PM -----

	Robert Walker
	03/30/2001 10:31 AM

		 To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Price Amendment

Here is the amendment we used.


Steve:

I know that Tana has already answered your immediate question.
I am responding because Enron Corp. is also asking for an ISDA.  I am the
Enron Corp. lawyer.  Can you also send a draft master to me?
Thanks.  Sara

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	steven.kessler@db.com
	02/08/2001 12:49 PM

		 To: sara.shackleton@enron.com, tana.jones@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Enron Capital & Trade Resources International Corp

Hi Sara/Tana--

I've been told to get started on Enron Capital & Trade Resources
International Corp. ISDA.  Is this handled out of Houston or in UK (or
otherwise)?

Thanks and regards,

Steve


susan mossman
920 fifth street
las vegas, NM 87701
mossmom@cybermesa.com

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

susan mossman


Juan,

home 248-366-3043
cell 248-766-0946
work 800-255-6116, ext. 4263

Laura

>>> <Juan.Hernandez@enron.com> 09/07/01 02:13PM  >>>
LAURA SEND ME YOUR HOME NUMBER, CELL NUMBER AND PAGER  AGAIN.  I'LL CALL YOU
TONIGHT.  MOM IS FLYING IN  TONIGHT
    -----Original Message-----
    From:   "Laura Hernandez"  <Laura.Hernandez@trw.com>@ENRON
              mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Laura+20Hernandez+22+20+3CLaura+2EHernandez+40trw+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
    Sent:   Friday, September 07, 2001 7:29 AM
    To:     spdhdz@aol.com;  sandra.hernandez@crescentcom.com;
              mslucyroman@earthlink.net; Hernandez,  Juan;
              Maria.Hernandez@lbb.state.tx.us; mroscarhernandez@yahoo.com
    Subject:  Hernandez Update
    Everyone,
   There has been a major shakeup at TRW.  I  have always  worked for TRW
   Automotive Electronics.   Well, we just got told that we TRW  AE has been
   dissolved  and no longer exists.  I support the Safety  & Security,  along
   with some Body Control plants.  Well, now I am   supposed to be going to
   the division known as Occupant Safety  Systems (Airbags  & Seatbelts).  I
   am not sure  what is going to  happen........
    Laura
**********************************************************************
This  e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may  contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended  recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly  prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for  the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at  enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message.  This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an  acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract  between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any  other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by  estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Hi Ken Louise and Jeff,

Attached are the links to the multimedia cases Harvard prepared in association with the cases recently written, excerpted from the videos they took of the 3 of you a few months ago.

I'm remotely  accessing this while travelling and have been unable to open the videos.  This is likely a function of the remote connection.

Ken and Jeff, I'll review each of yours when I'm better able to access. I'll then  provide you my comments (if any), as you will need to sign off on the release and use of these by Harvard.

Louise, will you please review at least your portion?

Thanks!

--Christie.
---------------------- Forwarded by Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT on 06/07/2001 09:51 AM ---------------------------

Meg Wozny <mwozny@hbs.edu> on 06/01/2001 10:47:33 AM
To:	Christie.Patrick@enron.com
cc:

Subject:	Enron Multimedia Cases

http://hbsdev.hbs.edu:8008/9-301-064/
http://hbsdev.hbs.edu:8008/9-301-085/

Hi Christie,
I'm happy to send you the links to our two Enron multimedia cases.  The
written part of the cases is exactly the same as their traditional,
hard-copy counterparts; the video clips are taken from the longer Enron
video tapes we had made in January.

I'll be sending you the required paperwork for your sign-off.  (We'll also
need sign-offs from the three case protagonists--Ken, Jeff and Louise.)  In
the meantime, if you could review the cases and pass them on for Ken's,
Jeff's and Louise's approvals, that would be great.

Please feel free to contact me if the video links don't work--I've checked
them on my machine and they seen to work fine, but things sometimes get
distorted in transmission--or if you have any questions.  Thanks for all
your help, and have a great weekend!
Best,
Meg
-------------------
Meg Glinska Wozny
Research Associate
Harvard Business School
Gallatin Lounge C
Soldiers Field
Boston, MA 02163

voicemail: (617) 496-0802
facsimile:  (617) 496-6943
email: mwozny@hbs.edu


Barbara,

Will this be at 4:00 PM on Monday?  Sally has meeting w/ Louise Kitchen from
3:30 to 4:30, so she will probably be 30 mins late to Jeff's meeting.

Patti


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 09/28/2000 06:14 PM -----

	Mary Hain@ECT
	09/28/2000 05:38 PM

		 To: Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Mona Petrochko, jdasovic@ees.enron.com
		 cc: Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: California Strategy RE: PG&E

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 09/28/2000 03:45 PM
---------------------------

Christopher F Calger
09/25/2000 08:00 AM
To: James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris H
Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Michael McDonald/SF/ECT@ECT,
Laird Dyer/SF/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: California Strategy RE: PG&E

Thanks Jim.  ENA is very interested in this topic.  I was talking with Mona
last week about my view that a strategy with PG&E should be supportive, not
adversarial.    ENA is extremely interested in a gas management position with
PG&E and they have made it clear to us that our public positions against them
are a significant commercial issue.  I will spend some time with Portland and
SF to get an ENA consensus on these points.

Chris

James D Steffes@EES
09/21/2000 09:28 PM
To: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris H
Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: California Strategy RE:  PG&E

FYI.

If you are not aware, PG&E is pushing for immediate end of their retail rate
cap (so they can collect wholesale energy costs).

EES is considering its positions in that matter to prepare for CPUC and
legislative proceedings.

I want to make sure that you are aware of these internal discussions.  Key
from EPMI include (1) endorse Cal ISO report conclusions, (2) competititve
default supplier, (3) increasing rate freeze for all customers, and (4)
transfer of PG&E Hydro to affiliate at $2.8B (to offset current
undercollection).

Please let me know if these positions make sense to you.  While I think that
our general position is retail volatility, given the current situation in
SDG&E that is simply impossible politically.

Please feel free to call.

Jim

---------------------- Forwarded by James D Steffes/HOU/EES on 09/21/2000
10:39 PM ---------------------------
From: Harry Kingerski@ENRON on 09/21/2000 03:54 PM
To: James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES
cc: Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES
Subject:

I met with Dennis Benevides, Jim Wood and Scott Gahn about the PG&E strategy
we discussed and the EES perspective.  Suggestions:

Endorse the recent CAL ISO report on causes of the problem (no utility
forward buying, no demand responsiveness, etc) and say, with a few tweaks,
their proposals were on target.

Get CTC roll-off no earlier than Spring '01.  Retroactive roll-off would be
devastating.

Use PG&E $15 billion exposure as leverage to get competitive default supplier
in place (get them out of merchant supply).

Impose a stair-step shape on the rate increase, to prompt customer migration.

Keep PG&E somewhat at risk for wholesale cost recovery, delay recovery of
under-recoveries until out years.

Keep rate freeze (which is preferable to rate cap) to as short a period as
possible, post '01.

Here is a rework of Jim's bullet points to incorporate these thoughts:
  Keep in mind the numbers are all just placeholders and are not meant to be
definitive.  Once we start to hone in on the concept, we can develop the
right numbers.

From a retail perspective, this blends protection of the book with
advancement of new market opportunity.  I may still get more feedback from
the EES guys, but wanted to give you what I got so far.


HUNTER SHIVELY,

The PEP system will be open through Friday, June 1st so that you may complete or decline your reviews.

Our records indicate that you have one or more requests for feedback that have not yet been submitted.  Please complete or decline these requests as soon as possible by logging into PEP at http://pep.enron.com and selecting Complete Feedback from the Main Menu.

If you have any questions, please contact the PEP Help Desk at:
Houston:  713.853.4777, Option 4 or email: perfmgmt@enron.com
London:  44.207.783.4040, Option 4 or email: pep.enquiries@enron.com

Thank you for your participation in this important process.


ThomsonInsider nightly alert for Friday, October 19, 2001
The Official Scorer of Insider Trading

Today's U.S. Insider Commentary

-----------------------------Special Announcement----------------------
________________________________________________________________
Try AutoVantage Gold for 3 months for only $1 and get $20 in FREE gas!
When you do, you'll gain peace of mind and enjoy bumper to bumper car-care
savings, roadside assistance, car rental discounts and more.  Get your $20
in FREE gas and start saving today!

http://www.orb.net/OFP/nvpopsite.cgi?insertionOrderID=7434&mode=index

________________________________________________________________

These 'Breaking News' articles were recently posted to the site:

CEO Makes Williams Companies Inc.`s Largest Addition to Date
http://insider.thomsonfn.com/tfn/alerts/art.asp?2414

CEO Leads Largest Selling to Date at Engineered Support Systems Inc.
http://insider.thomsonfn.com/tfn/alerts/art.asp?2415

Wachovia Corp. Execs Add Shares Following September Merger
http://insider.thomsonfn.com/tfn/alerts/art.asp?2416

-----------------------------Network ad-------------------------
________________________________________________________________

Get 10 FREE issues of Investor's Business Daily. Investor's Business Daily
is a unique research tool designed to identify winning stocks with
insightful charts and ratings you can't find anywhere else. This offer
carries no obligation and there's nothing to cancel.

http://ibd.infostreet.com/cgi-bin/freeoffer.cgi?source=AVF1JFL
________________________________________________________________

- Today's Most Predictive Insider Transactions:

Insider ROBERTS [score: 98] Buys 10,700 shares of
FLOW INTERNATIONAL CORP [FLOW]

Insider TABAS [score: 97] Buys 1,000 shares of
ROYAL BANCSHARES OF PENNSYLVANIA INC [RBPAA]

Insider STUCKERT [score: 97] Buys 2,650 shares of
ROYAL GOLD INC [RGLD]

Insider BENDER [score: 87] Buys 2,000 shares of
COOPER COMPANIES INC [COO]

Insider PATIENCE [score: 86] Buys 5,000 shares of
STERICYCLE INC [SRCL]

Insider MARINO [score: 51] Sells 4,500 shares of
RAILAMERICA INC [RAIL]

Insider WOLFF [score: 43] Sells 15,000 shares of
CV THERAPEUTICS INC [CVTX]

Insider SELLIAN [score: 23] Sells 298,208 shares of
NUCO2 INC [NUCO]

Insider LINDHOLM [score: 0] Sells 10,000 shares of
VIDAMED INC [VIDA]

http://insider.thomsonfn.com/tfn/insider.asp

If you would like to UNSUBSCRIBE from this service, please visit:
http://insider.thomsonfn.com/tfn/insider.asp?imodule=unsubscribe

For comments and questions please e-mail webmaster@thomsonfn.com
Please do not reply to this e-mail.

******************************************************************
Interested in achieving advertising results? Contact Drew Doyle at
1-480-367-9449 x284 or mailto:adplace@insidersb.com


Dynegydirect is now available for use.  If you have any questions or
concerns, please
 contact eCare.

DYNEGYdirect e- care
Customer Support
Dynegy, Inc.
Ph: (877) 396.3493   Fx: (877) 396.3492
Email: ecare@dynegydirect.com


Can you please pull the referenced contract and lets discuss.

---------------------- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 10/26/99 01:56 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Heidi Withers                           10/25/99 01:07 PM

To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Lauri A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Gillaspie/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda F
Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Hesse/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Michael Walters/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Transportation Gathering Contract for HPL transporting on HPL

Gerald,

Due to some changes in our business, we are needing to amend the current
transportation contracts for HPL transporting on HPL.  We will need to amend
the current 012-41500-02-003 contract, covering the transportation cost from
a particular wellhead all the way to Houston Ship Channel, to become two
contracts, one we call the "gathering agreement" (covering transportation
cost from the wellhead to a competitive supply curve like Thompsonville zone
or Agua Dulce zone) and then another agreement we call "marketing
transportatin agreement" (covering transportation cost from the competitive
supply curve to Houston Ship Channel).

We need these amendments to be effective as soon as possible since we are
targeting making the administrative changes effective during November
production month.  I tried to call you but was not able to be connected to
your voice mail.

I would like to sit down with you in the next couple of days to discuss this
change and what we need to do to have the agreements changed and the new
gathering agreement put into place.  Please respond via email or call at
3-1836 to discuss this issue further.  Thanks!

Heidi Withers


Let me know when you get the quotes from Pauline.  I am expecting to pay
something in the $3,000 to $5,000 range.  I would like to see the quotes and
a description of the work to be done.  It is my understanding that some rock
will be removed and replaced with siding.  If they are getting quotes to put
up new rock then we will need to clarify.

Jacques is ready to drop in a dollar amount on the release.  If the
negotiations stall, it seems like I need to go ahead and cut off the
utilities.  Hopefully things will go smoothly.

Phillip


Maria-

I just checked it and it worked perfect.  Thanks for your help.

Matt


---------------------- Forwarded by Sandra F Brawner/HOU/ECT on 01/08/2001
02:46 PM ---------------------------

"Pamela Anderson" <pama9@flash.net> on 01/07/2001 09:23:07 PM
To: "Lisa Barnwell" <lisab@discusdental.com>, "Terri Bailey" <tlbkk@aol.com>,
"Susan Schnitzer" <S.Schnitzer@worldnet.att.net>, "Sue Caldwell"
<sue@mbainsurance.net>, "Strphanie Friedhoff"
<Stephanie.g.Friedhoff@pfizer.com>, "Stafford, John"
<John.Stafford@commerceone.com>, "Sandra Brawner"
<Sandra.F.Brawner@enron.com>, "Pedersen, Julie" <julie.pedersen@neg.pge.com>,
"Patricia DeMamiel" <princess3456@dellnet.com>, "Pat Whitty"
<dpwhitty@duke-energy.com>, "Nancy Gilbertson" <ngilbertson@earthlink.net>,
"Virginia Taylor" <vtaylor@taylormkting.com>, "Morris, Lamar (SUGARCREEK XGH
317)" <LMorris1@pclient.ML.com>, "Lee McKinzie" <lmckinzie@stlukes-hou.org>,
"Lamar Morris" <lamar_morris@ml.com>, "Kody Newland"
<kodynewland@hotmail.com>, "Kathy Bennett" <kathy.m.bennett@usa.conoco.com>,
"Kathleen Kennedy" <kmk1@compassbnk.com>, "Kandy Daniel" <Kandydan@aol.com>,
"Jerry Anderson" <jeabudman@webtv.net>, "Hough, Lisa"
<lisa.hough@neg.pge.com>, "Hadnott, Wanna H." <Wanna.Hadnott@lyondell.com>,
"Gregg Anderson" <TEJASGREGG@aol.com>, "Dillard, Kari K" <dillarkk@bp.com>,
"Diana Ayers" <ayersdg@swbell.net>, "Denise Mosely" <denisem@houston.rr.com>,
"Dayna Erck" <derck@pdq.net>, "Dayna Erck" <derck@medicalprofiles.com>, "Dawn
Doga" <dawndoga@aol.com>, "David Dutch" <dutchd@kochind.com>, "Chris
Papousek" <cpapousek@aol.com>, "Carol Buckley" <gbuckley@houston.rr.com>,
<Camille.Gerard@enron.com>, "Brian Spack" <ashleynix@prodigy.net>, "angie
schniers" <angie.schniers@williams.com>, "Amanda C. Herzer"
<acherzer@aol.com>, "Ted Erck" <terck@medicalprofiles.com>
cc:
Subject: Fw: Time & Friends

----- Original Message -----
From: Kevin Cokinos <kcokinos@compuserve.com>
To: Pamela Anderson <pama9@flash.net>
Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2001 6:18 PM
Subject: Fw: Time & Friends

>
>
> -------------Forwarded Message-----------------
>
> From: "Rocky Stevens", INTERNET:rstevens@amelangpartners.com
> To:
> Date: 1/6/2001 11:44 AM
>
> RE: Fw: Time & Friends
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Rocky Stevens" <rstevens@amelangpartners.com>
> To: "Rocky Stevens" <rstevens@amelangpartners.com>
> Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2001 11:52 AM
> Subject: Fw: Time & Friends
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >          TIME AND FRIENDS
> > >  > > > > >
> > >  > > > > >
> > >  > > > > >
> > >  > > > > >Imagine there is a bank that
> > >  > > > > >credits your account each morning
> > >  > > > > >with  $86,400. It carries over no
> > >  > > > > >balance from day to day. Every
> > >  > > > > >evening deletes whatever part of
> > >  > > > > >the balance you failed to use
> > >  > > > > >during the day. What would you
> > >  > > > > >do? Draw out ALL OF IT, of
> > >  > > > > >course!!!!
> > >  > > > > >
> > >  > > > > >Each of us has such a bank. Its
> > >  > > > > >name is TIME. Every morning, it
> > >  > > > > >credits you with 86,400
> > >  > > > > >seconds.
> > >  > > > > >
> > >  > > > > >Every night it writes off, as
> > >  > > > > >lost, whatever of this you have
> > >  > > > > >failed to invest to good purpose.
> > >  > > > > >It carries over no balance. It
> > >  > > > > >allows no overdraft.
> > >  > > > > >
> > >  > > > > >Each day it opens a new account
> > >  > > > > >for you. Each night it burns the
> > >  > > > > >remains of the day. If you fail
> > >  > > > > >to use the day's deposits, the loss is yours.
> > >  > > > > >
> > >  > > > > >There is no going back.
> > >  > > > > >There is no drawing against the "tomorrow."
> > >  > > > > >You must live in the present on today's deposits.
> > >  > > > > >Invest it so as to get from it
> > >  > > > > >the utmost in health, happiness,
> > >  > > > > >and success! The clock is running.
> > >  > > > > >Make the most of today.
> > >  > > > > >
> > >  > > > > >To realize the value of ONE YEAR,
> > >  > > > > >ask a student who failed a grade.
> > >  > > > > >
> > >  > > > > >To realize the value of ONE MONTH,
> > >  > > > > >ask a mother who gave birth to a premature baby.
> > >  > > > > >
> > >  > > > > >To realize the value of ONE WEEK,
> > >  > > > > >ask the editor of a weekly newspaper.
> > >  > > > > >
> > >  > > > > >To realize the value of ONE HOUR,
> > >  > > > > >ask the lovers who are waiting to meet.
> > >  > > > > >
> > >  > > > > >To realize the value of ONE MINUTE,
> > >  > > > > >ask a person who just missed the train.
> > >  > > > > >
> > >  > > > > >To realize the value of ONE-SECOND,
> > >  > > > > >ask a person who just avoided an accident.
> > >  > > > > >
> > >  > > > > >To realize the value of ONE MILLISECOND,
> > >  > > > > >ask the person who won a silver medal in the
> > >  > > > > >Olympics.
> > >  > > > > >
> > >  > > > > >Treasure every moment that you have!
> > >  > > > > >And treasure it more because you shared it with
> > >  > > > > >someone special, special enough to spend your
> > >  > > > > >time.
> > >  > > > > >
> > >  > > > > >And remember that time waits for no one.
> > >  > > > > >Yesterday is history.
> > >  > > > > >Tomorrow is a mystery.
> > >  > > > > >Today is a gift.
> > >  > > > > >That's why it's called the present!!!
> > >  > > > > >
> > >  > > > > >It's National Friendship Week.
> > >  > > > > >Friends are a very rare jewel,
> > >  > > > > >indeed. They make you smile and
> > >  > > > > >encourage you to succeed.
> > >  > > > > >They lend an ear, they share a word of
> > >  > > > > >praise, and they always want to
> > >  > > > > >open their heart to us.
> > >  > > > > >
> > >  > > > > >Send this to everyone you
> > >  > > > > >consider a FRIEND.
> > >  > > > > >If it comes back to you
> > >  > > > > >know you have a circle of friends
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------- Internet Header --------------------------------
> Sender: rstevens@amelangpartners.com
> Received: from mail.engee.net (mail.netsential.com [209.113.126.3])
> by sphmgaaa.compuserve.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/SUN-1.9) with ESMTP id MAA03508;
> Sat, 6 Jan 2001 12:44:49 -0500 (EST)
> Received: from rocky2 ([208.191.150.97]) by mail.engee.net
>           (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-62453U1000L100S0V35)
>           with SMTP id net; Sat, 6 Jan 2001 11:44:45 -0600
> Message-ID: <003f01c0780a$3cc7b160$0500a8c0@swbell.net>
> Reply-To: "Rocky Stevens" <rstevens@amelangpartners.com>
> From: rstevens@amelangpartners.com (Rocky Stevens)
> To: <Undisclosed-Recipient:;>
> Subject: Fw: Time & Friends
> Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2001 11:58:10 -0600
> Organization: Amelang Partners, Inc.
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> X-Priority: 3
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
>
>


How in the hell do you get out of work at 3:45? Well, you've inspired me -
I'm going to haul ass home and maybe make it there by 6 pm - whoo-hoooooo!
But seriously, call me tonight if you get a chance. If not, I'll try you (if
I can dig up your home number somewhere) or call when you get into town this
weekend. I'll be around, so we HAVE to hang out at least once. 'Kay? Or I'll
just stalk you. 'Kay? Take care.

Love,
Kate


Start Date: 2/5/02; HourAhead hour: 23;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002020523.txt
!!!General SQL error.
Couldn't update; currently locked.
Table

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTstNW
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 2/5/02
  TIE_POINT: MALIN_5_RNDMTN
  INTERCHG_ID: ENRJ_CISO_3000
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM


A typo has invaded my email address in the Legal Work Group mailings going
around, so I am missing emails.  My correct email address is
"sberman@hewm.com"  Thanks.

> Stan Berman
> Attorney
>
> HellerEhrman
> phone: 206.389.4276
> fax: 206.447.0849
> email: sberman@hewm.com
> mail: 701 Fifth Ave., Suite 6100, Seattle, WA 98104
>
> The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged,
> confidential, and protected from disclosure.   If you are not the intended
> recipient, any dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly
> prohibited.  If you think that you have received this e-mail message in
> error, please e-mail the sender at "sberman@hewm.com".  Thank you.
Heller Ehrman White & McAuliffe LLP


Please call when you have reviewed.

 <<Memo to Taylor re EOL Expansion.doc>>

----------------------------------

This e-mail is sent by a law firm and contains information
that may be privileged and confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and notify us
immediately.

 - Memo to Taylor re EOL Expansion.doc


fyi

------ Forwarded Message
From: Haas Alumni Network <AutoMailer@alumniconnections.com>
Reply-To: AutoMailer@alumniconnections.com
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 03:09:54 -0500 (EST)
To: Bay Area Alumni <schneber@haas.berkeley.edu>
Subject: 12/ 5 Career Mgt. Presentation - Sunnyvale

The South Bay Chapter of the Haas Alumni Network presents

John Morel,
Associate Director of MBA Alumni Career Services at Haas, discussing
"Career Management in Uncertain Economic Times"

Wednesday, December 5,
6:30-7:30pm Networking, Light Food, and Refreshments (included)
7:30-9:00pm Presentation and Q&A
UCSC Extension Sunnyvale
Cost: $20

The prevailing climate of economic uncertainty has implications for us all.
John Morel, the alumni
career advisor at the Haas School, will speak on strategies for managing
your career in the
current environment.  Whether you are currently employed or seeking your
next opportunity,
this is a can't-miss presentation by an expert in the field.

To register online:
http://www.acteva.com/go/haassouthbay

To register by mail, send a check for $20 -- by December 3 --
made out to HAN South Bay Chapter -- to:
Vern Shure
608 Middlefield Rd.
Palo Alto, CA 94301

For more information, e-mail Vern Shure at vshure@alumni.haas.org.

Event Location:
UCSC Extension
1180 Bordeaux Drive
Sunnyvale, CA
Phone: (408)752-1300

Directions:
>From 101 North, take the Mathilda Avenue/Sunyvale/237 exit.
Stay on Mathilda, and turn right onto Moffett Park Dr., then left on
Bordeaux Dr.

>From 101 South, take 237/East Alviso-Milpitas Exit to the Mathilda Ave. exit.
Turn right onto Moffett Park Drive, then Left on Bordeaux Drive.

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

                     * REMOVAL INSTRUCTIONS *

If you would like to be removed from future mailings, please select
REPLY.  Keep the body of the original e-mail (or at least this ENTIRE
portion) in your reply message and type an 'X' in the appropriate box
below.  CHOOSE ONLY ONE.

[ ]  I am not the intended recipient, please remove me.
[ ]  I do not wish to receive promotional e-mail, please remove me.

This is a system-generated message.  Replies to this e-mail are for
AUTOMATED REMOVALS ONLY.  We're sorry, but additional text messages
will not be read.

[HAA3665460-A]
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

------ End of Forwarded Message


---------------------- Forwarded by Carla Hoffman/PDX/ECT on 08/23/2000 02:02
PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Pergher, Gunther" <Gunther.Pergher@dowjones.com>
     08/23/2000 12:26 PM

To: "Leopold, Jason" <Jason.Leopold@dowjones.com>
cc:  (bcc: Carla Hoffman/PDX/ECT)
Subject: DJ Calif Assembly Delays SDG&E Rate Roll-Back Vote To Thu

18:43 GMT  23 August 2000
 *DJ Calif Assembly Delays SDG&E Rate Roll-Back Vote To Thu

 Question About Who Will Pay Elec Bills

 NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--The California State Assembly has postponed until
Thursday
 a vote on restoring electricity rates for customers of San Diego Gas &
Electric Co. to
 pre-deregulation levels, according to a spokesman for Assemblywoman Susan
Davis
 (D-San Diego), who is sponsoring the bill.

 The bill was sent to the assembly's appropriations committee because some
 representatives are concerned about who - if not SDG&E customers - will pay
for
 electricity in the city this summer and past spring. The difference between
what SDG&E
 customers would pay under the legislation and what SDG&E is paying for
supplies in
 the skyrocketing electricity markets has been estimated at $1.5 billion.

 Assembly Passage Of Measure Uncertain

 The legislation would roll back electricity rates to June 1, 1999, levels
for customers of
 SDG&E, a unit of Sempra Energy (SRE). This spring and summer, the utility's
 customers have received electricity bills that are nearly triple what they
were last year.

 Electricity rates for the state's other utilities haven't been deregulated
yet, so their
 customers are receiving fixed prices per kilowatt-hour of power used.

 Prospects for passage of the bill, AB 2290, are unclear in the Assembly.
The California
 State Senate passed the bill unanimously last week. But it would need 54
votes to pass
 through the 80-member Assembly before Gov. Gray Davis could consider
signing it into
 law.

 If all 47 Democrats approve the measure, it would need at least seven
Republican votes
 to pass. But, as reported Tuesday, only three Republican lawmakers said
they would
 support the bill.

 The rollback would provide some economic relief to SDG&E's 1.1 million
customers,
 who have been paying market-based rates for electricity since June. If the
rollback is
 approved, utility bills for residential customers would be about $55 to $60
a month,
 according to SDG&E.

 Steve Maviglio, press secretary to Davis, said the governor hasn't decided
whether he
 would sign the bill into law if approved.

 Monday, the state's Public Utilities Commission rejected a proposal to roll
back rates,
 instead approving a stabilization rate plan that would reduce the cost of
electricity to
 about $68 a month for residential customers who conserve usage.

 -By Mark Golden, Dow Jones Newswires; 201-938-4604;
mark.golden@dowjones.com
 Copyright (c) 2000, Dow Jones & Company Inc

G_nther A. Pergher
Senior Analyst
Dow Jones & Company Inc.
Tel.  609.520.7067
Fax. 609.452.3531

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any
computer.

 <<Gunther Pergher (E-mail).vcf>>
 - Gunther Pergher (E-mail).vcf


Jennifer:  I will unfortunately not be able to make the call because I have
to be at the California PUC for the decision that they're issuing today.
Harry Kingerski, in Houston, might be able to join, though.

	Jennifer Rudolph@EES
	01/04/2001 09:46 AM

		 To: CA Team, EAM Support/HOU/EES@EES
		 cc: CA Assistants
		 Subject: San Diego Meeting

I apologize for the extreme delay.
We are, indeed, having our weekly San Diego Call today.

Agenda

Conference Call Details
Dates	Every Thursday starting on November 16, 2000
Time	11:30 am (CST)
Phone	(800) 991-9019
Passcode	6207248
Conference Room 	EB 751


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/27/2001 02:53
PM ---------------------------
From: Herman Manis/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/27/2001 01:25 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: FW: POMPANO BEACH PROJECT

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Gray, Barbara
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 11:41 AM
To: Engeldorf, Roseann; Manis, Herman
Subject: POMPANO BEACH PROJECT

FYI
----- Forwarded by Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT on 04/26/2001 11:38 AM -----

	Barbara N Gray 04/19/2001 11:50 AM 	   To: W David Duran/HOU/ECT@ECT  cc: Ann
Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT  Subject: POMPANO BEACH
PROJECT

Dave, since you and I discussed the Pompano Beach Project last week and the
history of the "rejected $10,000 Contribution to a city literacy group" and
the unfavourable Enron publicity which resulted, I thought you might be
interested in  the memo from Eric below and a brief "heads-up" on the current
state of affairs on this project.  The requirement that the Developer
provide a Fire Truck and  certain of the other costs we discussed in our
meeting have in the current draft been depicted as "fire protection services"
and other "services in connection with the development of the project " to
satisfy accounting concerns as well as to be less inflammatory .
Nevertheless, as you can see from the forwarded memo, there is a "leak" to
the press and I predict more negative publicity to come as the result of the
requests of the city, theNot in My Backyard feelings of the community, the
previous negative publicity, and the backlash of the controversy resulting
from Bush's election and accompanying local perception of Bush and Enron
being one and the same evil.

As you know Ben is in Florida today meeting with city officials and
discussing  the new proposed development agreement. Ann Elizabeth can provide
a copy of the latest draft proposal which has been blessed by accounting and
the Turbo-park gurus. Nothing will be signed without a legal opinion of local
counsel as to the legality of the proposed agreement when viewed in light of
the previous discussions with the city, including the terms contained in the
previous drafts  discussed between Steve Krimsky and city officials.

Sincerely

Barbara
----- Forwarded by Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT on 04/19/2001 11:09 AM -----

	Ann Elizabeth White 04/19/2001 10:51 AM 	   To: Barbara Gray  cc:   Subject:
Developer's Agreement and Payment in Lieu of Taxes

FYI.
---------------------- Forwarded by Ann Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT on 04/19/2001
10:51 AM ---------------------------

Eric Thode@ENRON
04/19/2001 10:20 AM
To: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven Krimsky/Corp/Enron@Enron,
orshefskyd@gtlaw.com, barshk@gtlaw.com, Ann Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Marchris Robinson/NA/Enron@Enron, Lea Sooter/ENRON@enronXgate,
bkeith@keith-associates.com
cc:
Subject: Developer's Agreement and Payment in Lieu of Taxes

I spoke to Tia O'Neill of the Pompano Pelican.  She received the same
information (as the Sun Sentinel received) from some nameless person
regarding the payment in lieu of taxes issue and some sort of statement that
this was a roundabout way for Enron to bribe our way to victory.  I explained
to her as I had the Sun Sentinel all of the issues surrounding this topic.
However, she went further with questions regarding possible amounts of $1
million (for property taxes) or even $2 million to cover "some sort of sales
tax."

It is quite evident someone close to the discussions is feeding the media.
Any thoughts?

I am unable to gather any more information from David Fleshler (Sun
Sentinel).  Interestingly though, the Sun Sentinel has not run the article on
this issue.  My guess is they have realized that there is no story here.

Eric


Shirley,

No problem.

Vince

Shirley Crenshaw
04/18/2000 08:00 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kevin G Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Vacation

Vince:

If it is allright, I would like to take two days vacation, Monday and Tuesday
April 24 and 25.

Please let me know.

Thanks!


Steve - We were hoping to provide a chart that plotted out the NOx emissions
from existing fossil fuel generation vs, new cleaner generation.  This chart
is not quite there.  However, it is a rough aggregate of the NOx generated by
all of the existing fossil fuel generation over 50 MW in CA.  The data points
were gathered from the EPA's Acid Rain CEMs (continuous emissions monitoring)
database.  (I am working on a chart that's message is more clear.) As you
will see, existing generation is significantly dirtier than what new,
combined cycle plants would be.  In fact, of the utility units in CA
reporting under Title IV, there are a number of steam plants with NOx
emissions of 0.1 lb/MMBtu or in some cases more.  This corresponds to about 1
lb NOx/MWh compared to 0.056 lb/MWh for a new gas combined cycle plant.  Even
the cleaner boilers that are at 0.05 lb/MMBtu are 10 times higher than the
new plants on an output basis.

In otherwords, Dave Parquet is right that there is a lot of more polluting
generation on line, while new plants have to meet ever tighter BACT
requirements.

In the most recent version of SB 28 it looks like there are a lot of
provisions focusing on the retrofitting of existing generation.  I suspect,
the regulators are well aware of the discrepancies in emissions and would
argue that the plants are going to have to clean up in the very near future.
I am digging for more information on these timelines.

Gus, Marc, and I felt like the main short term fixes/solutions would be:

1.  Expanding the hours of operations for back-up generators.  (As I have
previously stated, some of the local air districts have increased the
permitted run hours for emergency generators from 200 to 500 at only
"essential public services.")

2.  CA requiring offsetting of emissions at only the ratios required by
Federal regulations.  In many cases state requirements are more stringent.

3.  The EPA allowing the concept of the pollution mitigation bank - it is
really going to be an issue of timing - once the CA government has the funds
to start acquiring offsets they will be able to provide them prior to the
operation of a new generation facility, However, there is going to be some
initial lag time where the offsets aren't in the hands of the generation
operators (which goes against the requirements of the Clean Air Act).

4.  The Feds working with the state and local permitters to create alternate
sources of emission offsets.  There simply aren't enough in all the air
districts.  As I stated, in my previous memo the USEPA has allowed, under the
NOx SIP call, emissions allowances to be given to renewable and energy
efficiency projects. CA is going to need guidance from the USEPA in how to
create and count alternate sources of offsets in nonattainment areas.

5.  The USEPA better defining the nonattainment air sheds and pollution
transportation pathways.  Apparently, there is not a central model of the air
patterns in CA.  Thus, the 35 local air districts all having different
requirements about inter-district offsets.

However, the real issues as Dave alluded to in his memo are going to require
modifications to the Clean Air Act.  It is pretty prescriptive about what can
and can't be done, and there is not a whole lot of flexibility.

Let me know if anything in here is not clear.  I'm working on refining the
data and presentation of the data.

Mary Schoen
Environmental Strategies
Enron Corp
713-345-7422


I also wanted to pass on to you the estimated costs that were used:

Below are the rough cost estimates to apply drag reducing agent to the LaPlata to Bloomfield line.

	Facility modifications			$1,665,000

	Cleaning & application			   $165,000

	Re-application every 6 months		   $165,000

The facility modifications include a launcher at LaPlata, receiver at Bloomfield and a filter separator at the El Paso Blanco delivery.  The cleaning & application and re-applications costs include cleaning pig runs with methanol and surfactant as well costs for the actual DRA application.

For analyzing sensitivities, all costs are +/- 30%.

The re-application time period is also uncertain.  The probable window would be to re-apply as often as every three months and as infrequently as every 12 months.

John


I tried my new sweatpants on and I really like them.  Thanks.

Where is the place you used to get your car serviced?


Amanda,

Can you please add a link to Gas Fundy under the Testing tab called "West Cash Trades".   The file is called WestCashTrades.htm.  The description is, "Daily cash trade volumes by counterparty for West region locations."  Thanks.

Mat


Robert:

I have updated the info at Enron Methanol per gas control's volumes (via
meter overrides).  I did not realize that's what you wanted when you handed
me the "sticky" on Monday.....  I thought you were just being informative.

Sorry about the confusion.

Charlotte Hawkins

	From:  Robert E Lloyd                           04/04/2000 03:23 PM

To: Charlotte Hawkins/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Enron Methanol ; Meter #: 988291

 This is a follow up to the note I gave you on Monday, 4/3/00 { preliminary
flow data provided by Daren}.

 Please override POP'S  daily volume{ presently zero}  to reflect  daily
activity you can obtain from Gas Control.

 This change is needed  ASAP for economics purposes.


I will get you on @SCCC, even if I cannot play. It will cost you
nothing.Love U-Dad

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bass, Eric" <Eric.Bass@ENRON.com>
To: "Dad (E-mail)" <lwbthemarine@alltel.net>
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 2:25 PM
Subject: Question?

If wanted to play golf at sugar creek next wed, can I get on without you
and how much does it cost?

-e

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Andy,

Mark Tawney told me that you are setting up a cross-commodity desk.

I think it very interesting. Could you give me more details?

Depending on exactly you have in mind, we may be able to help you using weather products.

Thanks,

Claudio Ribeiro
(713)853-7313


FYI - The following books have been created in Netco database today (Canadian P/B/I).  Users access have been granted also.  The canadian gasdaily books have been renamed to FB-CENTX-CAD-GD.

167137	FB-CENT1-CAD	MK	CENT1	NGGJ	GJ	CAD	NG/GJ/CAD
167138	FB-CENT2-CAD	MK	CENT2	NGGJ	GJ	CAD	NG/GJ/CAD
167139	FB-CENT3-CAD	MK	CENT3	NGGJ	GJ	CAD	NG/GJ/CAD
167140	FB-CENT4-CAD	MK	CENT4	NGGJ	GJ	CAD	NG/GJ/CAD
167141	FB-CENT5-CAD	MK	CENT5	NGGJ	GJ	CAD	NG/GJ/CAD
167142	FB-CENT6-CAD	MK	CENT6	NGGJ	GJ	CAD	NG/GJ/CAD

Cecilia
x53362


Mike & Suzie Heiser

msheiser@aol.com


Hi Keith,
Just thought I would see if you are still with Enron, and lo and behold! there is your name.  I hope that all is going well for you.  I haven't looked closely, but I assume that you are still in Houston.  Do you like it?
All is well with me.  I'm living in Oxford, England, and am now working part time with a little company called Enron Direct.  The part time comes because I have a beautiful little 2 year old daughter, and she keeps me very busy.
Write back if you get a chance.
Crystal

ps  what is (little) Jon's last name?  Does he still work for Enron in Houston also?  Crystal
And I don't mean Lavorato!


Alan Aronowitz is working on a presentation he has to give in Singapore on
Global Energy Derivatives, and wanted to put a little blurb in of some kind
about weather.  He wanted to see if he could get a copy of the presentation
you and Mike Corbally gave at the ISDA seminar to see if there were any
slides that might be helpful for his presentation.  Do you have a copy I can
provide him?  Thanks!


This probably happened because he is a daily or hourly trader and in the past
we have not seen these deals to see the notes to add the contacts.  With the
change in the criteria for confirmation, we will now view these deals and add
the contacts as they come across.  If anyone has a list of contacts they want
added, please send the names and the company name and we will put them into
the system.

---------------------- Forwarded by Sharen Cason/HOU/ECT on 01/31/2001 04:43
PM ---------------------------
   Kate Symes                01/31/2001 04:20 PM

To: Sharen Cason/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: contacts

I forwarded this e-mail on to all our traders to give them a heads up about
the new process. I did receive feedback from one trader, Mark Fischer, who
said that when he began with Enron he was always told that if a contact name
was not in the system that he was supposed to enter it into the comments
section. He did this diligently under the pretense that eventually these
names would be added to the system, but they apparently never were. He wanted
to let me know of this, especially because when the traders are hurriedly
entering deals, they probably won't always take the time to type in the
contact name in the comments section.

Let's see if we can update this list somehow. Let me know who I can contact
for this or how we can set this up.

Thanks,
Kate

	From:  Sharen Cason                           01/31/2001 07:14 AM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Kimberly Hundl/Corp/Enron@Enron, Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: contacts

Currently, we do not confirm west deals that flow 6 days or less so we have
not had to be real difficult about contact names in deal entry.  However,
starting February 1, we are going to confirm all next day deals in the west
using the same criteria we do in the east - that is - deals 3 days or less
are sent on a confirmation that does not require a signature and everthing
else on a letter requiring a signature.  Hourly deals will not be confirmed.
So it is very important that the traders fill in a contact name when they are
entering deals.  The confirmation letter cannot be prepared without a contact
name.  It stops the whole process.  We are not going to be able to put names
in every time they do not.

If they do not see the contact they want in the drop down list,  put the
correctly spelled first and last name in the comment section in deal entry
and we will add this contact to the list and it should appear the next day.

If you can help us out with this, maybe we won't have to keep asking you for
contacts.

Thanks!


LOCATION is EB46C1

Purpose is for persons with overall responsibility for B2B and Aspect to
1  hear from George and Morris on issues with B2B and Aspect  and help sketch
out a path forward and timeframe to resolve the issues - 60 minutes
2  hear from Morris Brassfield on the Integrated Supplier initiative and help
sketch out a path forward and time frame to implement - 30 minutes


Sounds ok to me.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hass, Glen
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 2:07 PM
To:	Harris, Steven; Kilmer III, Robert
Subject:	FW: Conference Call with PG&E to Discuss the Gas Portion of Its Proposed Plan of Reorganization that It Will File w/FERC Toward End of November

I would recommend that we participate.  In addition to myself we may want Steve V and/or Teb to also attend as they explain their FERC filing for making the backbone system jurisdictional.  Let me know if you concur and then I'll advise Jeff.  Thanks--gh

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 4:55 PM
To:	Tycholiz, Barry; Tribolet, Michael; Mellencamp, Lisa; Hass, Glen; Miller, Stephanie; Tholt, Jane M.; Lawner, Leslie; Cantrell, Rebecca W.; Steffes, James D.; Novosel, Sarah; Harris, Steven; Fossum, Drew
Subject:	Conference Call with PG&E to Discuss the Gas Portion of Its Proposed Plan of Reorganization that It Will File w/FERC Toward End of November

PG&E called.  They want to set up a conference call to brief us on the gas piece of their POR that they'll be filing with FERC around November 30th.  They want to try to do it in the next couple of weeks. Please let me know if you're interested and please pass this along to anyone else who might be interested.  Thanks.

Best,
Jeff


TO: ????????????AD HOC COMMITTEE ON THE CALIFORNIA ELECTRICITY CRISIS

FROM:???DAVID J. TEECE

RE:?????????????THE MANIFESTO

-----------------------------------------------------------

SEE MEMO AND MANIFESTO ATTACHED, AND RESPOND IMMEDIATELY.

Many thanks.

 - manifesto memo.doc
 - manifesto.doc
======================================
David J. Teece, Director
Institute of Management, Innovation and Organization
F402 Haas School of Business #1930
University of California, Berkeley
Berkeley, CA  94720-1930
Phone:  (510) 642-1075
Fax:  (510) 642-2826
http://haas.berkeley.edu/~imio
======================================


Teco Tap       28.333 / Enron


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 10/25/2000
10:25 AM ---------------------------

Dawn C Kenne
10/25/2000 09:19 AM
To: "Amanda Barnard" <ajbarnard@houston.rr.com>, Pam B Boxx/HOU/ECT@ECT,
"derek campbell" <derek.campbell@paslode.com>, PMDESMAR@earthlink.net, Linda
J Ewing/HOU/ECT@ECT, maxnbev@wesnet.com (Max Fledderjohann), "garynkay"
<GARYWGARRETT@email.msn.com>, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT,
HeightsHappy@aol.com @ ENRON, "Keeling, Ingelisa" <ikeeling@velaw.com>, "B.
Kenne" <yona_edoda@yahoo.com> @ ENRON, plmichaud <plmichaud@pdq.net>, "Ray
Vincent" <raylvincent@hotmail.com> @ ENRON, Eric Wardle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ed
Zajicek <e.zajicek@pentasafe.com>, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jason
Wolfe/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Torrey Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: taxclaity.com

---------------------- Forwarded by Dawn C Kenne/HOU/ECT on 10/25/2000 09:18
AM ---------------------------

"Bythewood, Richard" <rbythewood@txi.com> on 10/25/2000 09:14:08 AM
To: "'Brad Baker'" <bbaker@mesh.net>, "'Brad Levy'" <brad_levy@compusa.com>,
"'Brendan O'Brien'" <brendano@crossmk.com>, "Michael, Chris"
<cmichael@txi.com>, "'Darrell Brown'" <dkbrown2@flash.net>, "'Dawn Wilson'"
<Dawn.C.Kenne@enron.com>, "'Fred Silva'" <silvauh60@aol.com>, "'Gary Wilson'"
<R.Wilson@oracle.com>, "Spindler, Jenny" <jspindler@txi.com>, "'John
Belcher'" <johnbe@microsoft.com>, "'John Everett'"
<john_b_everett@email.mobil.com>, "'John Stefek'" <stefek@onramp.net>,
"'Karen Hendrix'" <karen.hendrix@biin.com>, "'Kevin Kalis'"
<kkalistx@hotmail.com>, "'Kristin and Darrell Herbel'" <KUAlums@aol.com>,
"'Matt Louk'" <sigmaxaa@ix.netcom.com>, "'Mike'" <mike@bythewood.com>, "'Mike
Parker'" <MParker173@aol.com>, "'Mitch'" <mitch4269@hci.net>, "'Philip
Stavens'" <pstavens@flash.net>, "'Roger @ Home'" <gbythewood@aol.com>, "'Sal
Navarro'" <JANSAL@aol.com>, "'Sandra Dial'" <sdial@ix.netcom.com>, "'Scott
Martin'" <scotta@wt.net>, "'Scott Spindler'" <Sdspindler@aol.com>, "'Shelly'"
<rbwood@ix.netcom.com>, "'Steve Dillard'" <steve_dillard@matrixes.com>, "'Tim
and Missy'" <Tim_Holmes@intgate.rbfalcon.com>, "'Tim Holmes'"
<tholmes@intgate.rbfalcon.com>, "'Tom Collier'" <tgcollier@msn.com>, "'Wally
Gomaa'" <wally.gomaa@gwl.com>, Brendan Obrien <brenman@ix.netcom.com>, Chris
Michael <cmichael@txi.com>, Don Copeland <donald.copeland@telops.gte.com>,
Doug Webb <dwebb2@pdq.net>, Garrett Goeters <garrett.goeters@compaq.com>,
Gary Wilson <R.Wilson@oracle.com>, Juan Harris <JHarris914@aol.com>, Kevin
Cooper <Kevin.Cooper@txdps.state.tx.us>, Nathan Reese <nreese@mindspring.com>
cc:

Subject: taxclaity.com

This is a cool site comparing the Bush and Gore tax plans.  Click on the
link below and follow the instructions to see which plan saves you the most
money.

RB

http://www.taxclarity.com

Richard Bythewood
Dallas Office:          972-647-3930
Mobile:                   817-925-6128
e-mail:                   rbythewood@txi.com


Offered ePrime FT.....5 cents East to East (ie, Tumbleweed and Oasis) with
alternate firm to Needles at Permian-SoCal Gas Daily differential less fuel,
then splitting profits TW 75% and ePrime 25%.
Working with Bob Burleson with SPS power plant connection.  Offered ePrime
(the gas managers and affiliate of SPS) a .03 cent transport rate from Oasis
to the new proposed interconnect (Panhandle leg) in exchange for volume
commitment of 3 bcfs over 5 years.  ePrime is planning on using the transport
for loads during the 4 peaking summer months.
Analyzed West flow transport contracts for future expiration dates without
ROFR extentions.  Putting together list of details for solicitation, allowing
us to sell and hedge higher transport rates and taking advantage of current
market spreads


Kim:

Here is another one.  We have a deal with this muni - Eastern New Mexico Gas
Company.  The price is Permian plus $05/MMBtu plus transport.  Deliveries are
on TW.  The deal is expiring 4/30/01.  John Mattics is the contact
(505/355-2468).  He called me yesterday to see if we were interested in
extending the deal.  The desk likes the deal as it gives them some
flexibility on TW (I am not sure exactly what the value is there, but I think
Janie likes the deal).  Can you check with Tori or Janie and see if they want
to extend the deal?  Is the price OK?  Also, what is your fax number....I
will fax you the contract.

Chris


- 12_19_01ON.xls


Everyone List - those that will most likely be actively involved with
negotiating swap docs are highlghted in blue

Bill  Bradford
Debbie Brackett
Tanya Rohauer
Molly Harris
Sue Vasan
Paul Radous
Jane Wilhite
Wendy Conwell
Ed Sacks
Tracy Ngo
Jay Williams
Russell Diamond
Brant Reves
Veronica Espinoza
Rudwell Johnson
Darren Vanek
Tom Moran
Nidia Mendoza
Walter Guidroz
Wendi Lebrocq
Veronica Gonzalez
Ken Curry
Aparna Rajaram
Carol North
Teresa Seibel
Andrew Greer
James Copeland
Martin O'Leary
Lesli Campbell
Angela Brown


Please see the attached file for the revised inception document. I would
appreciate any comments. We will be working on the specification of phase 2
once this document is signed off.

Thanks

Zhiyong

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Kitchen, Louise
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 11:15 AM
To: Wei, Zhiyong
Cc: Stock, Stephen; Storey, Geoff; Sullivan, Colleen; Perlman, Beth; Bibi,
Philippe A.
Subject: RE: GTV II

Comments:

Zhiyong Wei to be added to signature lists.
Timeline to include production dates - ie include UAT and production roll-out
dates.
Dependencies - where there are dependencies on other groups (any interaction
required with any group outside of Zheiyong's), these need to be highlighted
and a representative from that group needs to sign off on that portion of the
timeline ( a representative can not be below Director level in the
organiztion).

There are clearly many people rolling off early in this project who can be
utilized for Phase II - I would suggest the specfication for Phase II is
completed in the very near future as the majority of the work in this is done
in the very short term by the developers and it moves to the test team.

Please re-issue today.

Louise

From: Zhiyong Wei/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/16/2001 12:34 PM
To: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stephen Stock/ENRON@enronXgate, Geoff Storey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Colleen
Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beth Perlman/ENRON@enronXgate, Philippe A
Bibi/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject: RE: GTV II

Louise,

Attached please find the inception document requested. I would greatly
appreciated your comments. I will be consulting Colleen and Geoff for any
necessary revision. I will be requesting signatures on Wednesday afternoon,
March 21.

Thanks

Zhiyong

 << File: inception_GTV II.doc >>

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Schoppe, Tammie   On Behalf Of Kitchen, Louise
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 4:24 PM
To: Wei, Zhiyong
Cc: Stock, Stephen; Storey, Geoff; Sullivan, Colleen; Perlman, Beth; Bibi,
Philippe A.
Subject: GTV II

I understand we have now finalized 90% requirements on the GTV II.

Please could we pull together the format inception document this week for
signature on your meeting next week with Geof and Colleen.

Document to include all requirements, dependencies and timelines.

I would suggest whoever is writing this spend some time with Geof this week.

Please circulate to draft all listed above including me.

Thanks,

Louise