Thanks for the info.  I actually am involved in an
adopt a family program here in SF!
Happy Holdiays!!!
MJ

--- Kim.Ward@enron.com wrote:
> Hello everyone!  and Happy Holidays!
>
> Although the equities markets haven't been that good
> to us this year, most
> of us can say that we enjoyed a pretty prosperous
> year.  I also know that
> it is the time of the year that it seems like
> everyone is wanting you to
> contribute to one thing or another and you are just
> wondering how you are
> going to get everything done before Christmas or the
> New Year.  You may
> already be involved in an activity that is helping
> those less fortunate
> than yourselves make it through a tough holiday
> season but  I wanted to
> give you a chance to help someone in the case that
> you wanted to share your
> prosperity but didn't have the opportunity.
>
> I am a member of a team from the Enron Portland
> office - not sponsored by
> Enron itself - in adopting a family to help in a
> time of need.  This family
> consists of a single mother, separated from her
> husband for a few short
> months, with an 11 year old daughter and an 8 year
> old son.  This family is
> living in a one bedroom apartment on $600 per month
> from child support.
> This young woman is looking for a job.  Our team is
> collecting money to
> shop for gifts, clothes, needed household items,
> food, and a couple of
> toys.  We are also accepting wrapped gifts
> consisting of the same.   We
> will be visiting this family in a couple of weeks to
> find out more about
> what they need and then again to deliver our items
> on December 21st.
>
> I am excited about being involved with this project
> because I will be
> meeting this family and will be directly involved in
> providing them items
> that I know I take for granted.  If you are
> interested in contributing
> either cash or a gift, not only will it be
> appreciated, it will be tax
> deductible.  This family is sponsored by the
> Salvation Army and they will
> be sending receipts directly to each donor.
>
> If you would like to contribute, you can send your
> donation to me at either
> home or at work.  Checks can be made out to me or to
> our captain, Jeffrey
> Oh.  We will need your address (if I don't already
> have it) to send to the
> Salvation Army so you will get a receipt. We will be
> required to submit
> receipts for the items we buy, as well as a pledge
> sheet with your name,
> address, adn donation amount to the Salvation Army.
> If you have any
> questions, please give me a call.
>
> Thanks in advance for any of you that are
> interested!  And again, I wish
> you all the best for the holidays!
>
> Kim
>
>
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
http://shopping.yahoo.com/


Dear Neil,

Jeff asked me to let you know that he will be at Paul Hobby's open house this
evening and hopes to see you there to discuss Genesis Park and Vitol.  In the
event you two do not cross paths there, please let me know and we'll see what
we can do to schedule a meeting before the end of the year.

Regards,
Sherri Sera
Assistant to Jeff Skilling
713.853.5984
713.646.8381 (fax)
sherri.sera@enron.com

Neil Kelley <NKelley@TQCap.com> on 12/01/2000 02:51:21 PM
To: "Jeff Skilling (E-mail)" <jeff.skilling@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Genesis Park

Jeff, I've been meaning to corner you at one of the YPO functions to spend a
minute discussing a couple of topics.  First and foremost, I wanted to
introduce Genesis Park which is a "new economy" investment company that's
been recently founded here in Houston by Paul Hobby, Fred Lummis, Steve
Gibson, Peter Shaper, Bruce Herzog and myself.  Paul and I were hoping to
have an opportunity to spend 30 minutes with you in the next few weeks to
describe in person what we're all about.  And to be clear, we're not looking
for Enron money, we are raising money from private individuals.  We've
already met with Jay Fitzgerald and Steve Horn to establish the
Enron/Genesis business relationship.

I also wanted to get your views on Enron's approach to oil trading and
whether the Vitol Group presented an opportunity.  Frankly, I think Vitol is
an excellent acquisition target although the success they've enjoyed in the
last year or two will make it a bit more difficult.  They have an
unbelievable franchise, but they also have some fundamental weaknesses which
could be exploited to Enron's benefit.  I'm shooting in the dark here but
hopefully it's worth some discussion.

If you can free some time during this busy holiday period to meet, it would
be greatly appreciated.  Paul and I could come to your office, or possibly
you could come to our "offices" over on Hermann Park.  We're buying 17 acres
on Hermann Park adjacent to the Park Lane Towers which we plan to develop
into a technology park.  For the time being, we are officing in a high tech
shed on the property!

Please let me know.  Thanks/Neil.


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 08/22/2000
09:22 AM ---------------------------

Phillip M Love
08/16/2000 02:31 PM
To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: Marksman Program

---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 08/16/2000
02:26 PM ---------------------------

Shane.Dobbs@fctg.com on 08/16/2000 02:20:40 PM
To: jmjaked@mindspring.com, dobbswn@auburn.edu, jwood@regionsbank.com,
stephaniepool@huntersystems.com, dobbsmw@auburn.edu, bigb@sonet.net,
plove@enron.com
cc:
Subject: FW: Marksman Program

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Reed [mailto:mdr@mcvantage.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2000 1:59 PM
To: Bart Kelley [BKELLE01@BIRSTEEL.com] (E-mail); Linda White
[LWHITE01@BIRSTEEL.com] (E-mail); Mark Atkins (E-mail); Michael Reed Sr.
(E-mail 2); Rodney Vaughn (E-mail); Dobbs_Shane; Tommy Zadick (E-mail);
Will Reed (E-mail)
Subject: FW: Marksman Program

-----Original Message-----
From:?? Kelly Henderson
Sent:?? Wednesday, August 16, 2000 1:57 PM
To:???? Michael Reed; Splinter Spann
Subject:??????? FW: Marksman Program

-----Original Message-----
From:?? Darren Richardson
Sent:?? Wednesday, August 16, 2000 12:03 PM
To:???? Kelly Henderson; Rodney Haas; Tracy Haddock
Subject:??????? FW: Marksman Program

-----Original Message-----
From: SherriJ4 [mailto:sherrij4@mindspring.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2000 10:04 PM
To: Tony; Dee & Todd; Jeanne; Kaye; Karmine; KimC.; Tracy & John; Lindy
& David; Darryl & Wendy; Dana
Subject: FW: Marksman Program

?

?
 - alcohol.exe


---------------------- Forwarded by Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT on 07/18/2000
09:08 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Rebecca W Cantrell                           07/14/2000 04:31 PM

To: Julie A Gomez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Miller/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Chris
Meyer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT, Theresa Branney/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul T Lucci/DEN/ECT@Enron, Jane M Tholt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven P
South/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank Ermis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan W Pereira/HOU/ECT@ECT,
George Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Homco/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ray
Hamman/HOU/EES@EES, Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tori Kuykendall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda H
Fletcher/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Coates/HOU/EES@EES, John Hodge/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Janet Edwards/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ruth Concannon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sylvia A
Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Tate/HOU/EES@EES, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barbara G Dillard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary L
Payne/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Comments on Order 637 Compliance Filings

FYI

Attached are initial comments of ENA which will be filed Monday in the Order
637 Compliance Filings of the indicated pipelines.  (Columbia is Columbia
Gas.)  For all other pipelines on the priority list, we filed plain
interventions.


I was wondering if ya'll wanted to have a happy hour on Friday for Tim and
Louise in honor of their recent engagement.  Do you have any ideas on places
to go?

Let me know


Hi Clare,

How about:

Tuesday, May 9th 1:30-2:30 PM or 3:00-4:00 PM

Sally has tentative plans to go to Calgary May 10-12, so Tuesday is best for
her.  If neither of these time slots work, just let me know and I can move
things around to accommodate James.

See ya,
Patti


Start Date: 1/9/02; HourAhead hour: 19;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002010919.txt


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/08/2000
04:24 PM ---------------------------

Angie Collins
03/08/2000 03:49 PM
To: Nick Mooney/LON/ECT@ECT, Anastasia Karabatsos/LON/ECT@ECT, Ingrid van
Wees/LON/ECT@ECT, Stewart Peter/LON/ECT@ECT, Joseph Hrgovcic/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Steven Vu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Nguyen/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Zivic/HOU/ECT@ECT,
David Kistler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brando Hayden/HOU/ECT@ect, Paul R
Henry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lucy Ortiz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Valter
Stoiani/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rajib Saha/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tony Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mark Tawney/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jere C Overdyke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna
Baker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jose Marquez/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: URGENT - Introduction Meeting

A video conference with the London office has been scheduled for:

Date: Thursday, March 9
Time: 8:00 a.m. - 9:00 a.m. (CST)
Room: 30C1

Thank you

Angie


PRC Meetings begin on Monday, November 20th.  If you have not already done
so, please go in to PEP at http://pep.corp.enron.com and complete the
requests for feedback on the employees listed below.

If you have any questions, please call the PEP Help Desk at:

Houston:  1-713-853-4777, Option 4
London:  44-207-783-4040, Option 4
E-mail:  perfmgmt@enron.com

Thank you for your participation.

    ELLEDGE, SUSAN
    ESPEY, DARREN
    KINSEY, LISA M
    LENART, KIRK D
    MAHMASSANI, SOUAD
    PEREIRA, SUSAN W
    RING, ANDREA K
    SCHRAB, MARK L
    WHITE, JESSICA
    WILLIAMS, JASON C


Start Date: 1/14/02; HourAhead hour: 13;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011413.txt


Thank you so much for your help!


Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.

Midday Market View(TM) for Tuesday, May 15, 2001
as of 1:00PM EDT
Information provided by Standard & Poor's

================================================================

U.S. INDICES
(1:00p.m. EDT)

----------------------------------
Market            Value     Change

DJIA          10,849.00    - 28.30
Nasdaq Comp.   2,097.52    + 15.60
S&P 500        1,249.15     + 0.23
----------------------------------
NYSE Advancing Issues        1,705
NYSE Declining Issues        1,257
NYSE Trading Volume        498 mln
NASDAQ Advancing Issues      1,987
NASDAQ Declining Issues      1,621
NASDAQ Trading Volume      782 mln

==================================

U.S. TREASURIES
----------------------------------
Value            Yield      Change

1-year bill       3.77%        n/a
5-year note       4.99%     - 9/32
10-year note      5.47%     - 9/32
30-year bond      5.84%     + 1/32

The tables above look best when viewed in a fixed-width font,
such as "Courier."

================================================================

U.S. TRADING SUMMARY

Stocks continue to hover around unchanged levels as U.S. traders
await the Fed's decision on interest rates. Volatility and
trading volume diminished as the day wore on. While many traders
believe that the Fed will cut the key short-term interest rate an
aggressive 50 basis points, there is a sizable amount of
uncertainty surrounding the policy statement that will be
released with the Fed's rate decision. Given increasing
speculation that the Fed's easing cycle is coming to an end,
investors will closely scour the wording of the statement for
clues about future Fed actions. If the market interprets the Fed
as suggesting that its easing cycle is about to end, the stock
market's focus will likely shift back to corporate earnings,
which have been shaky of late and worrisome to investors.

----------------------------------------------------------------

U.S. TREASURY SUMMARY

All was quiet as bond traders await the outcome of the Federal
Open Market Committee's meeting at 2:15 p.m. EDT. Ahead of the
news, Treasuries drifted modestly lower on profit-taking as
shorter-dated Treasuries under-performed the bond. Reduced
expectations for continued Fed rate cuts have been the major drag
on shorter-term bills and notes this session. Look for Treasuries
to continue to trade in light volume ahead of the FOMC
announcement.

----------------------------------------------------------------

CURRENCY SUMMARY

With traders unwilling to make bets ahead of the FOMC meeting,
the dollar is little changed from morning levels against the euro
and the yen. The greenback is currently trading around 123.2 yen
and 0.879 dollars per euro.

----------------------------------------------------------------

MAJOR COMPANY / INDUSTRY NEWS
(All prices as of 1:05 p.m. EDT)

** Verisign (VRSN: 53.00, + 1.64) and the Department of Commerce
appear close to reaching an agreement that will extend Verisign's
control over the ".com" Internet address suffix, according to The
Wall Street Journal. The agreement would be a major coup for
Verisign, which maintains control over the majority of Internet
domain name registrations. The company has come under the
microscope from regulators amid voiced concerns from other
companies stating that Verisign's hold over ".com" is
anti-competitive. Currently, Verisign has a preliminary agreement
with the Department of Commerce to maintain control of the ".com"
suffix through at least 2007.

** Home Depot (HD: 50.11, + 0.96) reported a
stronger-than-anticipated profit in the first quarter of this
year, citing reduced expenses and stronger sales. The firm said
net income rose to $632 million, or $0.27 per share. Sales rose
9.8%. The firm was expected to earn $0.25 per share. As for the
next quarter, the firm said it expects to meet analysts'
expectations for per share profit.

** Bail has been set in the corporate espionage case involving
two former Lucent Technologies (LU: 9.80, + 0.09) employees who
are accused of stealing trade secrets. Authorities allege that
the information was destined for a company that is majority-owned
by the Chinese government. A federal judge set bail at $900,000
for each of the two defendants. The two former employees, along
with a third man, are accused of stealing source code and
software associated with Lucent's PathStar Access Server. The
case demonstrates the vulnerability of U.S. corporate companies
to the threat of global economic espionage.

** The time for individual stock futures is just around the
corner. Soon investors will be able to buy and sell futures on
individual stock issues on the largest U.S. derivatives
exchanges, according to newswire reports. Both the Chicago
Mercantile Exchange and Chicago Board Options Exchange have
agreed to take part in the venture. The joint venture will be its
own regulated exchange and a for-profit entity. A future
obligates the holder to buy or sell the underlying security, at a
date and price that is specified in the future. Single-stock
futures trading may begin as early as August for institutional
investors and in December for retail investors.

----------------------------------------------------------------

RESEARCH SPOTLIGHTS

** Friedman, Billings and Ramsey upgraded shares of Tupperware
Corp. (TUP: 21.99, + 0.07) from an accumulate to a buy rating.

** Morgan Stanley upgraded shares of Robert Half International
(RHI: 28.34, + 0.42) from an outperform to a strong buy rating.

** Jefferies upgraded shares of 3DO Co. (THDO: 2.95, + 0.12) from
a hold to an accumulate rating.

################################################################

Log in using the links below to:

Access your account:
https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start?SANC=CCBodyi&NeedCASelValue=Y

View your Email Alert customization options:
https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start?SANC=EAMyAlerts

Perform research or request a market quote:
https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start?SANC=Quotes

Place a trade order:
https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start?SANC=TradeStock

To visit Schwab's home page, use this link:
http://www.schwab.com/

-----------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe or modify your Email Alert customization options,
log in using the link below or copy and paste it into your
browser's address window:

https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start?SANC=EAMyAlerts

Now you can receive graphics Email Alerts in HTML format,
using helpful, full-color graphics and active Web links that
connect you directly to information you want. Use the link
below to log in and change your email format preference:

https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start?SANC=EAEditEmailAddr

----------------------------------------------------------------

Notice: All email sent to or from the Charles Schwab corporate
email system may be retained, monitored and/or reviewed
by Schwab personnel. (1000-8752)

Copyright 2001 Standard & Poor's MMS Inc.  All rights reserved.
Standard & Poor's MMS services are for personal use only.
Commercial use or redistribution in any form, print or
electronic, is prohibited.
Distribution by Quris, Inc.


Donna & Becky --

Do you have any good points of reference on the history of natural gas restructuring?

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Robert, Carrie
Sent:	Monday, August 27, 2001 9:33 AM
To:	Steffes, James D.
Subject:	Gas History

Hi Jim-

A lot of visitors that Jennifer and I tour are not familiar with Enron and even less familiar with our history and what started the gas commodity industry.  Given your expertise
and knowledge of natural gas, I was hoping you would be able to recommend article(s)/book(s) and/or spend about 20 minutes with Jennifer and I to help us better understand the history of the natural gas industry, what problems and inefficiencies exited to bring on deregulating the industry and how gas became a commodity.

Your help would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you.
Carrie Rob?rt
Manager, Enron Corporate Marketing
713-853-3522
carrie.a.robert@enron.com


I'll talk to Frevert but I really thought the panel session last year was incredibly weak and don't think something of that format should be pursued again.  I would hope for a major change in format.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	James, Terrie
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 9:44 AM
To:	Kitchen, Louise
Subject:	RE: Management Conference - Business Unit Panel

Yes, partly.  I saw John last week and he told me that his wife was due to deliver their second child on November 9 and he would possibly miss the conference.  However, I know Mark was also interested in having women represented and liked having both you and Janet on the panel to balance things out.

I know you'll do a great job -- you always do!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 2:04 PM
To:	James, Terrie
Subject:	RE: Management Conference - Business Unit Panel

Is it me and not Lavo due to him maybe not attending

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	James, Terrie
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 9:07 AM
To:	Horton, Stanley; Kitchen, Louise; Sherriff, John; Mcconnell, Mike; McMahon, Jeffrey; Dietrich, Janet
Cc:	Kean, Steven J.; Olson, Cindy; Clark, Morris; Lavorato, John; Delainey, David; Daw, Nicki
Subject:	Management Conference - Business Unit Panel

Hello All,

I'm planning the agenda for this year's Management Conference.  I've been working on the upcoming meeting since March, but as you can imagine, the direction has changed several times.

We are delighted to have General Norman Schwarzkopf delivering a keynote address on leadership, and Gary Hamel returning to help us process the past year.  While we have arranged an all-star line up of outside speakers, we also want to focus on what is happening inside Enron.  Rather than having only one or two business presentations, Mark Frevert has opted to moderate a panel to provide a high level overview of each of our primary operating units and has selected each of you to participate.

Currently, the panel is scheduled to take place 8:00-9:30am on Friday, November 16.  Please plan to present a very high level overview of your business.  You are welcome to use PowerPoint slides, but in the interest of time, presentations must be no more than 10 minutes.  Mark will introduce each of you, interject questions, encourage interaction, and ensure we stay on time.

Below is the proposed order for your presentations.  Regardless of your place in the rundown, you will need to be seated on stage by 7:50am and equipped with a microphone.  Because we have a full agenda that morning, we will try to begin the session promptly at 8:00am.

Stan Horton - Global Services
Louise Kitchen - Americas
John Sherriff - Europe
Mike McConnell - Global Markets
Jeff McMahon - Industrial Markets
Janet Dietrich - Retail

If you elect to use a PowerPoint presentation, please forward it to me electronically by Friday, November 9 or provide the presentation to me on CD at the Management Conference.  To ensure consistancy, I've attached a PowerPoint template that I would like you to use.

 << File: Sample Bullet Slide.ppt >>

Finally, Mark would like to meet with the six of you to finalize preparation for the panel at 4:00pm on Wednesday, November 14 following your arrival at the Management Conference.  The meeting will take place in the Library off the Main Lobby of the Westin La Cantera.  In the meantime, if you have any questions or need any assistance, please contact me.  I look forward to working with you.

Regards,
Terrie James
Senior Director, Corporate Communication
(ph) 713.853.7727
(fax) 713.646.3248
terrie.james@enron.com


?

CRISIS... AND OPPORTUNITY?
Power Markets 2001

March 14-16 | Aladdin Hotel | Las Vegas

Click here to view?
 CRISIS AND OPPORTUNITY: POWER MARKETS 2001
http://www.pmaconference.com/0103Agendah.pdf

[IMAGE]

March 8, 2001:
Crisis and Opportunity Update

Join the Power Marketing Association at its annual spring meeting to discuss
the issues: ?California: What's in store for the summer? ?Gas Price
Volatility-- Why? ?Power Market Risks-- Explained; The Texas Retail Market--
Will it Work?; ?New Powerplants-- How big is the opportunity? Credit Risk--
How to manage it; Real Prices-- is the retail market ready to live without
price caps? ; Weather risk-- is it a market yet?; Transmission constraints--
are they completely intractable?; Provider of Last Resort-- is this a dumping
ground? The web-- what's real, what isn't-- beyond the hype; Retail billing--
Getting it right before you're bankrupt; Powerline Telecom-- The next big
thing?; Rolling Blackouts-- ?Peak shaving?; Distributed Generation-- Has the
time come?; Coal- fuel of the future-- and present. ?and ?Where is your
career going? ??There are already hundreds of registrants. ?Join us!

Here are some stories from the past couple of days on the PMA website,
powermarketers.com. ??Energy is moving to center stage in national policy
again. ?Get the latest-- click on the stories below, and click on our
conference brochure. ?See you in Vegas!

Power Markets 2001: Crisis and Opportunity - March 14-16 2001 Aladdin Hotel
Las Vegas Agenda Goes Gold
The final agenda for Power Markets 2001 is now available on the Power
Marketing Association website. ??Already, hundreds have registered to attend
the conference, scheduled for March 14-16, 2001 at the Aladdin Hotel in Las
Vegas. ?Hotel rooms are filling up. ?Last chance for this year's conference.
??
Download brochure at http://www.pmaconference.com/0103Agendah.pdf

UtIlicorp United Seeks Power Supply Contracts
UtiliCorp United (NYSE:UCU) is seeking power supply contracts to secure up to
1,250 megawatts of annual capacity for up to 15 years to help meet the
long-term energy demands of its 425,000 customers in Missouri, Kansas and
Colorado.
http://199.97.97.163/IMDS%PMANAT0%read%/home/content/users/imds/feeds/comtex/2
001/03/06/bw/0000-3703-.industrytopstories.util

Natural Gas Prices Drop Average Spot Figure Still Nearly Double Year-Ago Level
Natural gas prices have dropped for a second consecutive month. But prices
remain nearly double what they were a year ago, with no return to last year's
figures expected anytime soon.
http://199.97.97.163/IMDS%PMANAT0%read%/home/content/users/imds/feeds/bellsupe
r/2001/03/06/HFCT/0000-2302-KEYWORD.Missing

Nu-Coned Merger Talks Collapse State Utility Plans Lawsuit, Says Partner
Backing Out
Merger talks between Northeast Utilities and Consolidated Edison Inc.
collapsed Monday evening. NU said it would sue ConEd, arguing that the New
York utility was backing out of the $7.5 billion deal.
http://199.97.97.163/IMDS%PMANAT0%read%/home/content/users/imds/feeds/bellsupe
r/2001/03/06/HFCT/0000-2300-KEYWORD.Missing

Enron's Chief Denies Role As Energy Villain / Critics Regard Kenneth Lay As
Deregulation Opportunist
Kenneth Lay is one of the energy "pirates" accused by California's governor
of fleecing consumers. As chairman of Enron Corp., the world's largest energy
trader, Lay is arguably the biggest, baddest buccaneer of them all. ?But
that's not how he wants to be seen. And he certainly doesn't like taking
knocks from Gov. Gray Davis for having contributed to California's energy
mess.
http://199.97.97.163/IMDS%PMANAT0%read%/home/content/users/imds/feeds/bellsupe
r/2001/03/04/SFC/0000-2688-KEYWORD.Missing
?
?
Click here to view?
 CRISIS AND OPPORTUNITY: POWER MARKETS 2001
http://www.pmaconference.com/0103Agendah.pdf

?

Qualify for the?
CERTIFIED POWERMARKETERS EXAM
Attend PMA's preconference seminar:

FUNDAMENTALS OF POWER MARKETING
 http://www.pmaconference.com/0103Agendah.pdf

Covered at the Fundamentals of Power Marketing Seminar
Introduction to the Power Industry
Getting Started as a Marketer
Lexicon of Power Marketing
Indexed Transactions
Swaps
Tolling Agreements
Option-type transactions
Finance-type transactions
Serving the Retail Power Marketer
Retail Power Marketing
Key Issues in Retail Access
Nuts and Bolts of Retail Marketing
Future of Power

This program is valuable not only for new industry participants, but for
professionals who need an overview and "back to basics" review to provide
context for their jobs.

FUNDAMENTALS OF POWER MARKETING
March 14, 2001

Click here to view?
 CRISIS AND OPPORTUNITY: POWER MARKETS 2001
http://www.pmaconference.com/0103Agendah.pdf


- Neon -Suffering.doc


Alan,

The points are fine.  I'm not sure if it will help, but we may consider
stating in item 2 that there is no Enron Corp. payment or performanceguaranty
in connection with these contracts.   [Note to Alan & Mark: Payment support
is instead provided by a sophisticated payment priority and
trustee-to-trustee payment mechanism that is designed to provide payment to
LNG contractors prior to debt service under most circumstances].

On your point regarding naming the suppliers, there are no restrictions on
mentioning generic information, such as names, quantities, start dates, etc.,
all of which has been put into the public domain through various press
releases and other agreed promotional materials.  Nevertheless, I'd recomment
that we avoid specifically naming the suppliers, and instead just refer to
them generically as "DPC's two Middle Eastern LNG fuel suppliers."  I
absolutely agree that any additional detail we offer at this point will
likely invite still more questions and get us deeper into a discussion on
issues for which we don't presently have any firm answers.

Dan

Alan Aronowitz@ECT
01/11/2001 05:38 PM
To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Daniel R Rogers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Talking Points for India LNG Contracts

Per your request, here's a stab at the talking points:

The two Dabhol Power Project's LNG term supply contracts for Phase II are
between the power plant's owner, Dabhol Power Company ("DPC"), and Oman LNG
LLC, and Abu Dhabi Gas Liquefaction Company Limited, respectively ("LNG
Suppliers").  [Mark, we could potentially spell out more details about the
contracts, but I don't think it would be wise b/c it may invite more detailed
inquiries and, more importantly, DPC has confidentiality provisions to
uphold].

The LNG Contracts are solely the obligations of DPC, which is owned in part
by an Enron affiliate and other third parties.  There is no Enron Corp.
credit support for these obligations.

DPC has a team in place that is closely and actively monitoring and assessing
all aspects of the Indian power market situation, including the fuel supply
aspects

Preliminary discussions between DPC and the LNG Suppliers indicate a
willingness on the part of both parties to satisfactorily resolve any fuel
supply-related issues stemming from the Indian power market situation

Please let me know if you would like to discuss.

Regards, Alan

Note: Dan, please indicate if you think the names of the suppliers can/should
be mentioned in the talking points.


Paul Leanza with Clinton may have a market for the Peoples Gas.  Dick wanted
me to talk to you to see if it sounds ok.  Give me a call when you get a
chance.


Read your notes re scheduling a call w/ or w/o GE.  From John's and my
perspective, it seems that we should first have an internal call re the
consolidation of our assignments from weeks past  into Peter's draft contract
and then send to GE for their review and follow up call either later this
week or next.  Steve Swift is OK with this approach.

At the moment we seem to be knee deep w/GE and Owner on Arcos and suspect
that 9:30 CST (3:30 London time) will be difficult for us to call in.
Instead, 1:30 CST would work better for us.

If this works for the Houston gang could you let us know soonest and we will
let Mike and Steve know as well.

	Sheila Tweed@ECT
	05/15/2001 04:18 PM

		 To: John G Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc: Scott Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Kay
Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: GE- Standard Domestic Contract- Need your help

Would you all be in a posiotion to get together tomorrow morning at 9:30 am
Houston time to review the issues list and  talk about how we get to the end
of this process with GE.  We immediately need to start the drafting of the
Longview turbine contract and I'd like to see if we are close enough to get
that started.  Scott, today the extension to the Agreement in Principle
expires and we need to extend.  Can you tee this up with Steve Swift?  Our
meeting tomorrow will be in lieu of the regularly scheduled GE call.  I'll
let them know we will call them later this week or we'll talk next Wednesday,
but I would like to get through whatever we need to in order to get the
Longview Turbine Contract going.
I've talked to John Schwartzenburg about this and he is available tomorrow
morning.


As most of you know, in a last ditch attempt, we are trying to develop a
complete "solution" to the California problems that can be presented in the
Sec of Treasury discussions.  It would be very helpful if people would
comment or provide analysis on the likelihood of the following settlement
points:

1. Long-Term Contracting
key need of CA is NEW POWER PLANTS - KEY MESSAGE - AND IT'S IN CALIFORNIA'S
AUTHORITY TO DELIVER
Live Auction conducted by DEALBENCH
auction should be focused on "build" economics
parties bid ($/Mwh) for the right to deliver 500+ MW (the right size needs to
be determined) into Cal ISO control area for 5 years and the winning bidder
obtains a pre-approved generation site in California (with all permits,
siting obligations, and interconnection - BIG ISSUE) to build starting within
2 months
focusing on just delivered energy without generation site is difficult to
price (market too illiquid)
keep the number of auctions to a minimum (probably 6 - 10) for each utility
Counterparty is State of California (some agency)
maybe structure the bids to be 50-50 baseload vs. peaking

2. Utility Retail Ratemaking
per RELIANT ENERGY model, need $85/Mwh on average to work within retail
framework (how much would rate increase does this create?)
goal must be to have EBITDA positive utilities, although long-term utilities
should be EBITDA = $0 for generation sales
keep the current PX structure?
Utilities may have to "eat" some of the current undercollection

3. Interim Credit Support
pro rata credit from all creditors (including banks and energy suppliers)
60 day forbearance (to allow the auction to occur)

4. Liability
PG&E, SDG&E, and SCE agree not to sue any suppliers
State of California considers "taking" all civil cases and not pursuing
State of California agrees not to pursue any criminal cases

5. Other Actions
FERC agrees to immediate price cap lifting
FERC and California agree to complete non-stakeholder board for ISO
CPUC immediately finds that the result of the auction is "reasonable"

The key point is to (1) stop the current bleeding by getting long-term deals
in place soon and (2) manage the rate shock.  We will be working three things
(1) structure of the long-term auction, (2) rate model showing how high
prices of long-term auction power can be, and (3) financial results for
utilities under this outcome.

What else needs to be included in a settlement?

Jim


Tana I have converted the document into word, so I don't know why it's
saving the attachment as a wpd.  See if you can open it and how it looks,
call me.

 - BTB501!.WPD


What do I get if I break the chain?


Notice Number:  01-121
April 5, 2001

TO:
ALL COMEX DIVISION MEMBERS

FROM:
M. Dawn Lowe
Vice President and Assistant Corporate Secretary

SUBJECT:
Proposed Amendment to COMEX Gold Supplement No. 3 &Approved Assayers for
Gold8 and COMEX Silver Supplement No. 4 &Approved Assayers for Silver.

Attached please find a proposed amendment to Supplement No. 3, &Approved
Assayers for Gold8 of the Gold Futures Contract and Supplement No. 4,
&Approved Assayers for Silver8 of the Silver Futures Contract which add Alex
Stewart (Assayers) Ltd. as an Approved Assayer for the COMEX Division,s Gold
and Silver Futures Contracts.

The proposed amendment to Supplement No. 3, &Approved Assayers for Gold8 of
the Gold Futures Contract and Supplement No. 4, &Approved Assayers for
Silver8 of the Silver Futures Contract affects a &Special Matter8 under the
terms of the COMEX By-Laws.  Accordingly, COMEX Division Members have ten
(10) days to submit a petition signed by owners of at least 155 COMEX
Division Memberships requesting a vote of the COMEX Division Members to
disapprove the amendments, pursuant to the procedures set forth under COMEX
By-Law 205(D).  If a petition is not received, or if the amendment is not
disapproved, it will be submitted to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission
(CFTC).

If you have any questions, please contact Dawn Lowe at 212-299-2370 or Albert
J. Getz at 212-299-2608.

Proposed Amendment. Underlining indicates additions and bracketing indicates
deletions.
Gold Supplement
No. 3
COMMODITY EXCHANGE, INC.

APPROVED ASSAYERS FOR GOLD

Ledoux & Company
359 Alfred Avenue
Teaneck, NJ 07666
(Orders:  NJ (201) 837-7160)

Alex Stewart (Assayers) Ltd.
Caddick Road
Knowsley Industrial Estate
Knowsley
Merseyside L34 9ER
England
( Orders: 0151 548 7777 )

US LOCATION:
Alex Stewart (Assayers) Inc.
472 Westfield Avenue
Clark, NJ 07066
(Orders: (908) 827-0656)

A H Knight
Eccleston Grange
Prescot Road
St Helens
Merseyside
WA10 3BQ
England
(Orders: (01744) 733757)

US LOCATION:
A H Knight North America, Ltd.
PO Box 3504
130 Tradd Street
Spartanburg, SC 29304-3504
(Orders: (864) 595-1627)

Proposed Amendment. Underlining indicates additions and bracketing indicates
deletions.
Silver Supplement
No. 4
COMMODITY EXCHANGE, INC.

APPROVED ASSAYERS FOR SILVER

Ledoux & Company
359 Alfred Avenue
Teaneck, NJ 07666
(Orders:  NJ (201) 837-7160)

Alex Stewart (Assayers) Ltd.
Caddick Road
Knowsley Industrial Estate
Knowsley
Merseyside L34 9ER
England
( Orders: 0151 548 7777 )

US LOCATION:
Alex Stewart (Assayers) Inc.
472 Westfield Avenue
Clark, NJ 07066
(Orders: (908) 827-0656)

A H Knight
Eccleston Grange
Prescot Road
St Helens
Merseyside
WA10 3BQ
England
(Orders: (01744) 733757)

US LOCATION:
A H Knight North America, Ltd.
PO Box 3504
130 Tradd Street
Spartanburg, SC 29304-3504
(Orders: (864) 595-1627)

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=sara.shackleton@enron.com&
refdoc=(01-121)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


__________________

----------------------------------------------------
This message contained attachments.
A copy of the message with attachments can be found in:
Inbox\\Calendar Attachments


Jeff Fuller will be in town on August 3rd 12:00 to discuss information exchange.  Let me know if you are available.

Stewart


OK

-----Original Message-----
From: Erik Wollam [mailto:erwollam@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 12:34 PM
To: Parks, Joe
Subject: running

jOE;

I'm interested in keeping up with my running. Would like to see if I could
run every once in a while with you at Memorial Park. Do you go around
4???4:30 then home?? that could work with me once a week or so. e.

_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx


Part 2

Ford Looks Good in First Outing

Heralded freshman point guard T. J. Ford looked as good as advertised
Wednesday night in the Longhorn basketball team's annual intrasquad scrimmage.
Senior guard Fredie Williams, sophomore guard Royal Ivey and sophomore
swingman Brandon Mouton had 19 points each to lead the scoring, but Ford had
16 points and nailed a three-pointer with five seconds left to knot the score
at 75-75. Coach Rick Barnes called it a draw at that point.
The Longhorns, who tied for last in the Big 12 Conference in field goal
percentage during the 2000-01 season (.412), shot well.  Both teams connected
on better than 50 percent of their field goal attempts and three-point field
goal attempts during the scrimmage.
"Coming into the season, we knew we had to get better with our field goal
percentage," Barnes said.  "I look at the stat sheet and I know we can shoot
even better than we did tonight.  I think we are a better driving team this
year, and that penetration will help our shooting.  I was pleased with
tonight, and I really like the chemistry on this team."
The Orange team was led by Mouton and Ford, plus senior forward Chris Owens,
who scored 17 points. Ford's 16 points included four of six treys, plus eight
assists and just three turnovers.
Williams and Ivey led the White squad.  Sophomore center James Thomas had 15
points and a game-high 10 rebounds, while sophomore forward Brian Boddicker
scored 15 points (4-of-6 threes) and had seven boards.
A trio of Longhorns did not suit up for the scrimmage due to injuries,
including junior guard Terrell Ross (foot, ankle), freshman swingman Sydmill
Harris (achilles) and freshman forward/center Chris Wright (knee). Wright is
expected to redshirt this season to rehabilitate his knee. The other two
should return this season.
Texas is slated to play two home exhibition games at the Erwin Center
(Wednesday, Nov. 7 vs. Alaska Anchorage, 7 p.m.; and Tuesday, Nov. 13 vs. EA
Sports All-Stars, 7 p.m.).

Newcomers Star for Women

Freshman center-forward Mercedes Williams and sophomore guard Kaira White
scored 12 points each to lead the White to a 61-36 win over the Orange in the
annual Texas women's basketball scrimmage Tuesday.
Senior guard Asha Hill had 11 points, including a game-high three
three-pointers, and senior forward Dana Godfrey  finished with 10 points.
Sophomore center Stacy Stephens had nine rebounds to lead both teams in that
department and she also scored seven points for the White.
Senior forward Tracy Cook led the Orange team with 10 points and freshman
forward Jody Bell added seven points and six rebounds.
The White squad held a 37-30 edge in rebounding and shot 45% from the floor,
hitting 22 of 49 shots, while the Orange squad hit at a 33.3 percent clip
(16-for-48).
"It was a little shaky out there at first, but that's to be expected," coach
Jody Conradt said. "You could easily tell who the returnees were by their
solid presence on the court, whereas the freshmen looked a little tentative
and uptight."
"We are looking for our identity right now. We do want to run with the ball,
but we've got to work on pushing the ball up the court quicker, getting the
outlet passes released quicker and taking the ball out of bounds as fast as
possible."

Important Notice

Because next Monday, November 12, is Veterans' Day, my next issue will be
e-mailed a day later than usual on Tuesday, November 13.

Subscribe To The E-Mail/Fax To Get Year-Round Football
& Recruiting Scoops !
Save Big As
An Internet Subscriber !
Whether you live close to Austin or far away, the True Orange E-Mail/Fax
Service is the way to keep up with Longhorn football and Longhorn recruiting
- instantly. It has about 110 to 120 timely e-mail/faxes a year, primarily
about football and football recruiting.  To  subscribe, send your check to
True Orange, Box 26530, Austin, Texas 78755, and copy or clip the coupon
below and fill in the blanks. If you want it mailed, or by E-Mail, just
include the right numbers.

o I'm enclosing $99 for the 99-fax package for the next year
o I'm enclosing $130 (an $11 saving) to renew my subscription to True Orange
and to subscribe to the 99 faxes.
o I'm enclosing $79 for the 99-fax package for the next year by E-Mail (a $20
saving)
o Here's  $110 to renew my subscription to True Orange and to subscribe to
the 99 faxes by E-Mail (a $31 saving)
o Here's  $99 to subscribe to True Orange via the Internet  and to subscribe
to the 99 faxes by E-Mail (a $42 saving)

Name

Fax No.
(or E-Mail or mailing address)

Game Quotes . .

"We played a very talented team that is well coached and is on a roll in the
BCS mix. It hurts when you throw an interception, have a punt return, a kick
return and a bad snap that all lead to eventual touchdowns and realize your
spotting Texas 28 points.
- Baylor head coach Kevin Steele
* * * *
"Early in the ball game, the defense did what it was supposed to do. It
stopped Baylor when it had to. Then the offense did what it was supposed to
do. It started scoring touchdowns. It got a little sloppy after that, but
overall, I thought we did a good job."
- Texas defensive coordinator Carl Reese
* * * *
"In most cases today, the run was outnumbered. We knew it would be hard, but
Cedric (Benson) did a good job for us, and we were able to get good matchups
in the passing game because they had to play Roy (Williams) and B. J.
(Johnson) and Sloan (Thomas) one on one. We ran two backs more than we have
in other games to try to get more blocking."
- UT offensive coordinator Greg Davis
* * * *
"I might have gained 108 yards today, but it didn't come easy. The offensive
line did a great job today. Baylor played tough all day long. I feel like the
offense is starting to get into a rhythm. Hopefully we can keep stepping it
up more each week. I'm happy with the win. Every team in the Big 12 has
talent and winning on the road isn't easy."
 - Longhorn freshman RB Cedric Benson
* * * *
"It's really competitive out there and we did a lot of things right, but we
made too many mistakes to beat a team as good as Texas."
- Baylor wide receiver Reggie Newhouse
* * * *
"I thought we were going to make more big plays, and I got a little impatient
at times. Overall, I thought the offense played well and moved the ball and
scored some points."
- UT quarterback Chris Simms
* * * *
"My eyes lit up when I saw that man-for-man coverage. We've got the mentality
that nobody can cover us man for man. I respect them for trying it. We
haven't seen a lot of manh coverage this year."
- Longhorn wide receiver Roy Williams, who had six catches for 147 yards and
a touchdown
* * * *
"It was just like being at home. I wanted everyone to know I can compete with
the older guys, and that's hard to do when you're a freshman."
- Texas freshman linebacker Derrick Johnson, talking about coming back to
Waco, where he starred for the Waco Lions, for the first time as a college
player

Texas-Baylor Statistics

Scoring Summary
Texas           14      14         7      14    -       49
Baylor           0       10         0        0  -       10

UT -R. Williams 36  pass from Simms (Mangum kick) 4:24 1Q (6 plays 69 yds)
UT - Simms 1 run (Mangum kick) 2:16 1Q (4 plays, 28 yds)
BU - Zachry 10  run (Andino kick) 12:29 2Q (6 plays, 48 yds)
UT - Thomas 31 pass from Simms (Mangum kick) 5:18 2Q (4 plays 84 yds)
UT - Robin 2  run (Mangum kick) 0:52 2Q  (4 plays, 23 yds)
BU - Stiles 28 FG 0:00 2Q (8 plays, 52 yds)
UT - Benson 3 rrun (Mangum kick) 12:04 3Q (6 plays, 37 yds)
UT - Benson 6rrun (Mangum kick) 13:48 4Q (6 plays, 43 yds)
UT - Pearson fumble recovery in end zone (Mangum kick) 12:58 4Q

        Official Attendance: 40,451

Team Statistics

                        Texas       Baylor
First Downs           20             16
Rushing             9              5
Passing           11               9
Penalty             0              2
Rushing Attempts, Net Yards         42-130            36-8
Net Yards Passing        276            187
Passes Comp., Att., Int.                17-32-1         24-44-1
Total Plays, Offense                 74-406      80-195
Avg. Gain per Play                 5.5         2.4
Fumbles Lost                    0 of  0      1 of 5
Penalties, Yards                       2-14       7-53
Punts, Avg.                    6-39     11-46.3
Time of Possession      30:01        29:59
Third-Down Conversions               5 of 14        3 of 18
Fourth-Down Conversions     0 of 2       0 of 2
Sacks by Team, Yds Lost     4-25         3-16

Individual Statistics
Texas
Rushing - Benson 26-108, 2 TD; Ike 3-11; I. Williams 2-7; Jeffery 1-7;
Beltran 2-6; B. Johnson 1-3; Matthews 1-2; Robin 1-2, 1 TD; Team 1-minus 1;
Applewhite 1-minus 6; Simms 3-minus 9, 1 TD
Passing -  Simms 15-29, 271 yds, 2TD, 1 Int.; Applewhite 2-3, 5 yds, 0 TD, 0
Int.
Receiving - R. Williams 6-147, 1 TD; Thomas 3-66, 1 TD; Benson 4-33; B.
Johnson 2-25; Ike 2-5.
Baylor
Rushing - Golden 8-42; Zachry 11-15, 1 TD; Krieg 8-10; Ricks 2-3; Lagway 1-2;
Vinson 5-minus 30; Stiles 1-minus 34.
Passing - Zachry 21-36, 173 yds, 0 TD, 1 Int.; Vinson 1-1, 11 yds, 0 TD, 0
Int.; Cicero 2-6, 3 yds, 0TD, 0 Int.; Harrington 0-0, 0 yds, 0 TD, 0 Int.
Receiving - Blakley 3-47; Omboga 2-21; Gage 2-14; Fredrickson 1-8, 1 TD;
Gilmore 1-7.
Tackles by Texas Players, Unasst., Asst., Total
Pearson 8-1-9; Rawls 3-5-8 ;D. Lewis 4-3-7; Brooks 5-1-6; D. Johnson 3-3-6;
Doiron 3-1-4; Babers 2-2-4; Wilkins 1-3-4; J. Anderson 2-1-3; Gordon 2-1-3;
Vasher 2-1-3; Redding 1-2-3; Jammer 1-2-3; Tubbs 1-2-3; Nguyen 2-0-2; Hill
2-0-2; Robin 2-0-2; Trahan 1-1-2; T. Jones 1-0-1; Bradford 1-0-1; Ungar
1-0-1; Geiggar 0-1-1; Hightower 0-1-1; Thornton 0-1-1.

Tackles for Losses:  Pearson 1-minus 4; Gordon 1-minus 3; D. Johnson 2-minus
2; Wilkins 2-minus 2; Rawls 1-minus 1; Doiron 1-minus 1; Vasher 1-minus 1.

Sacks: Redding 1-minus 9; Gordon 1-minus 7; T. Jones 1-minus 7; J. Anderson
1-minus 2.

Scouting Kansas

Texas will host Kansas at 11:30 a.m. Saturday in the Longhorns' final home
game of the season. It will not be televised.
Texas is 8-1 overall and 5-1 in the Big 12. Kansas is 2-6 overall and 1-5 in
the Big 12. As if the Jayhawks didn't have enough problems, head coach Terry
Allen got the axe Sunday and one of his assistants was named interim coach.
Kansas opened the season with a 24-10 win over Southwest Missouri, then fell
to UCLA, 41-17. The Jayhawks lost at Colorado, 27-16, before upsetting Texas
Tech in Lubbock, 34-31.
Then they lost to Oklahoma, 38-10, fell to Missouri in three overtimes,
38-34, lost to Kansas State, 40-6, and fell to Nebraska, 44-7.
A pair of Texans lead the Jayhawk offense. RB Reggie Duncan of Killeen is
their top rusher, averaging 73.5 yards per game, and QB Mario Kinsey of Waco
is averaging 106.2 yards per game in total offense.
Kinsey is a scrambler who has 190 net rushing yards this season, despite a
lot of sacks.
This Kansas team has had its moments, headed by the upset of Texas Tech in
Lubbock, but it has too little offense (109th in the country) and too little
defense (90th in the nation) to compete with Texas unless the Longhorns mess
up royally.
Look for freshman RB Cedric Benson to have a good day against a run defense
that gives up 236.3 yards a game and for QB Chris Simms and his receivers to
light up the scoreboard, too.

Here's how the teams compare statistically (national rank in parenthesis):
Texas                    Kansas
Offense
(51)     164.7       Rushing Avg.         (91)   118.3
(39)     240.6       Passing Avg.         (96)   161.6
(40)     405.3      Total Off. Avg.     (109)  279.9
(5)        39.2      Scoring Avg         (100)    18.5
Defense
(10)       86.2      Rushing Avg.       (111)   236.3
(8)       165.8      Passing Avg.         (27)   186
(3)       252       Total Def. Avg.       (90)   422.3
(5)        13.1  Opp. Scoring Avg       (102)     34.5
Longhorn Notes . .
* Texas improved to 31-0 when outrushing its opponent in the Mack Brown era.
Conversely, the Longhorns are 4-12 when outrushed by their opponents under
Brown.
* Freshman RB Cedric Benson had 108 rushing yards, giving him 682this season
and moving him  into fifth on the UT freshman list. He is the eighth player
in UT history - and the first freshman - to rush for 100 yards in four
straight games. Benson also tied Earl Campbell's freshman record for 100-yard
games in a season (4). He ran for two scores, giving him seven rushing TDs
this season. That places him fourth on the UT freshman list, one shy of the
record of eight shared by Ricky Williams, Butch Hadnot and Graylon Wyatt.


Got your voice mail.  My thoughts are the following:

1.  I always insist that there is a breakdown of accounts by lawyer name,
hourly rate and task description.  If it is not in this account I do not know
why and I think it is appropriate that you ask for it and receive it.

2.  I would have expected the account to be large and that there are a number
of people involved.  I lost involvement (at the direction of Delainey and
Milnthorp) early in this project after the initial crisis management stage,
but my observations of the number of people and resources involved are the
following:

At the outset we needed a number of people to manage the search and related
technical and legal issues in the short term.  Over the longer term, staffing
requirements ought to be greatly reduced and it seems that since the original
crisis management stage the file has been over staffed.  At the same time, in
fairness, I believe Blakes feels that the are responding to the requirements
of Enron to throw al ot of resources at the project.  If it has not already
happened, I believe you should speak to Dan Fournier to confirm our
expectations and to discuss rationalizing resources.  As I say, I was asked
to step back from this project, but I am happy to have this discussion with
Dan Fournier if you prefer.

Also, I did not receive a copy of the account, but it seems to me that at our
direction Blakes hired a number of economic and political consultants which
will also be greatly expensive and which will as I understand be billed to
Blakes and included in Blakes accounts as disbursements to maintain
privilege.  If it has not already happened, I also believe the use of the
consultants also needs to be rationalized.

I also expect that VE will have a not insignificant account.

In summary, since the initial stage I have had limited involvement, but I am
not surprised (and would have expected) that the account is large and I
expect that larger accounts are coming once consultant accounts start to roll
in.  I believe that detailed account breakdowns are appropriate but also that
the use of all consultants including Blakes needs to be rationalized.  I also
believe that Blakes has done an excellent job and that a lot was be asked of
them in the early stages and therefore they were throwing a lot of resources
to the project.

Lastly, in anticipation that this would be expensive and that there would be
a number of people involved, Rob Milnthorp initially spoke to John Lavorato
about setting up a separate Houston RC for the project which John agreed to.
The RC number I gave you may have been a Canadian RC and I need to confirm
with accounting.  In any event, I will be sending a subsequent e-mail to all
internal groups to make sure that all expenses, internal and external, are
billed to that separate RC.

Peter.

Please let me know if I can be of any help.


Here is a link to the FERC order issued on Friday requiring refunds for the
month of Jan. 2001.  In light of this order, Greg Copeland has suggested
that we consider supplementing our San Diego remand briefs and referencing
the order in our remand oppositions in San Francisco.  Let's discuss on
tomorrow's call.

> http://www.ferc.fed.us/electric/bulkpower/EL00-95-017.pdf


We have many deals in the system with UI, but they are all part of one contract.  To my knowledge, this is the only big contract we have with them.  Just wanted to let you know because going through all the deals would be time consuming and they basically are one huge deal.

Stacey

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Murphy, Melissa Ann
Sent:	Wednesday, January 02, 2002 1:45 PM
To:	White, Stacey W.; Evans, Casey
Cc:	Theriot, Kim S.; Reeves, Leslie
Subject:	RE: Recent Contract Terminations

Stacey,

I have attached updated termination lists.  FirstEnergy and GPU have been added to the attached spreadsheets (along with a few other counterparties not referenced in your e-mail below).  United Illuminating has terminated as well but we are researching which trades are terminated.  I will let you know once the research is finished.  I spoke to David Portz about the other counterparties listed below.  He said they are all terminated and we should be notified on the next list we receive from legal.

 << File: Financial Power Terminated.xls >>  << File: Physical Power Terminated.xls >>

Let me know if you need anything else.

Thanks,
Melissa
3-1886

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	White, Stacey W.
Sent:	Wednesday, January 02, 2002 12:34 PM
To:	Murphy, Melissa Ann
Cc:	Theriot, Kim S.; Reeves, Leslie
Subject:	FW: Recent Contract Terminations

Have you seen documentation on these counterparties?

Stacey
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Miller, Don (Asset Mktg)
Sent:	Friday, December 28, 2001 2:41 PM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.; Davis, Mark Dana; Burnett, Lisa; Miller, Jeffrey; Reeves, Leslie; Evans, Casey; White, Stacey W.; Gilbert, Gerald; Bentley, Corry
Cc:	Fallon, Jim; Sager, Elizabeth; Nettelton, Marcus; Bradford, William S.; Sacks, Edward; Portz, David
Subject:	Recent Contract Terminations

Below is an updated list of recent contract terminations.  I believe we need to review our internal notification system to make sure this information gets distributed in a more timely fashion.

United Illuminating - effective January 1, 2002
HQ Energy Services - effective January 1, 2002
First Energy Solutions - effective January 2, 2002
Old Dominion - effective January 10, 2002 - we should schedule in PJM through the 10th of January (do we have any other positions with Old Dominion).
Ameren Energy
GPU Energy - effective January 21, 2002 - we should schedule in PJM through the 21st of January (they may push back, but we should remind them that they will be subject to LDs).

Call David Portz at 3-9239 with questions.


I don't know what you're talking about..... that was a duck call........


I have talked to Neil about Bill Richardson of Kissinger McClarty using our company plane to go to Venezuela relative to our LNG project...to visit President Chavez. I'd recommend yes if it's worth  the expense to the business unit.


Paul- when will your review of the language be complete.  This language has
been given to outside counsel to incorporate in the world hunger standard.
Please keep in mind that in this case the contracting party is a vendor whose
job is manufacture the equipment and deliver it to the site, the vendor is
not involved in the construction other than providing technical direction of
installation.

Paul-  we need to talk- I thought I heard that the 7FA' are not considered
new technology.  I need to hear this from you, David  and Wortham before
opening up the subject of collateral damage and allowing the insurer to
subrogate.  I do not understand your comment on your naming the vendor as an
additional insured.  We are doing so in the case of Arcos.  What we are doing
in Arcos is making the vendor responsible under its warranty obligations for
colleteral damage.

I need to have a very clear understanding of what we can and cannot do it the
case of GE 7FA units.  Deviating from the past practice on 7FA's where there
is not a new technology issue will be a painful and expensive ordeal.

I can be reached in London  via Scott Dieball's cell phone 713-504-2742.
Please call.

	Paul E Parrish/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/16/2001 03:56 PM

		 To: John G Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Scott
Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt
		 cc: Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, David
Marshall/ENRON@enronXgate, James L Bouillion/ENRON@enronXgate
		 Subject: INSURANCE EXHIBIT FORTURBINE PURCHASE AGREEMENT

John:
The changes I suggested on the watercraft wording are still being reviewed
for completeness. I think what I gave you will work for most situations where
the watercraft is incidental to the work or is far removed from our being
involved [contractor to sub to sub contractor] but it does not address every
situation that we could be involved in. We may need to expand our wording
accordingly.

Likewise, your question on giving to the turbine venders the waiver of
subrogation and additional insured is an even bigger concern. You are asking
us to obligate ourselves in providing waiver and additional insured status to
GE which we cannot do.   As you know, we went many years with providing
turbine venders protection under the insurance because the market was soft
and underwriters agreed to it. Now they balk at giving it because of the
losses they have incurred and we cannot predict what they will agree to. It
does not matter if the machines are proto-type or not, there is a good chance
right now that they will not agree to insuring the vender. Everyone says it
only takes money and in many cases we could probably include venders on the
insurance but I cannot recommend committing to it in a long term contract )
we have to arrange the insurance at the time we need it in order to determine
if it is available.

If you need to have some language in the agreement, I would recommend that we
not give the waive and additional insured to GE or any vender. When we need
the insurance and begin placing it, we can then determine if the underwriter
will cover the vender and ask for a price reduction from GE to move their
risk to the underwriter.

I am sorry I cannot make this easier but that is the nature of the insurance
beast.
Paul


ADMINISTRATIVE

Japan National Television - John Ambler and Mike Terraso were interviewed
regarding Enron's Climate Change iniatives and statement.

Enron Campus - Ken Lovejoy and Clifford Salawage of ETS (manager Health and
Industrial Hygiene) met employees in the Enron building that have concerns
about the indoor air quality in their work area.  The issue is being
evaluated to determine an action plan.

EUROPE

Poland, ENS Power Plant - Alan Stringer conducted EHS gap analysis audit of
the facility and made recommendations on additional procedures required to
meet Enron Guidelines and provided advice on EHS aspects for exit strategy of
the site.

UK, Project McCook - Alan Stringer participated in a conference call with
Susan Worthen, Don Stevens, and Robert Brooks to discuss environmental issues
related to indemnification.  This deal is estimated to be signed next week..
Susan,s Team will need to conduct a due diligence within 60 days.

Japan, Brownfield Site  - Alan Stringer provided technical assistance and
requested historical information on potential brownfield site that EEOS are
considering in Japan.

UK, EPOL - TPS -    Alan Stringer and Henry Van are preparing the final list
of EHS issues from the O&M audit to be presented to Mike Terraso for
resolution.

ENRON GLOBAL ASSETS
(Central America, South America, India and Asia)

San Juan Gas Remediation - field evidence indicates that the tar has migrated
off-site to the neighbor,s property.

ENA

N. York, Edison Mission Brooklyn Navy Yard Facility - Bill Curra completed
the environmental due diligence evaluation of the Edison Mission cogeneration
plant for NE Power Origination.  Indications are favorable that the
acquisition will go forward, and further risk management assistance relating
to environmental issues will be required.

ACQUISITIONS

Sithe Independent Power Partners - 1000 MW combined cycle natural gas fired
cogeneration facility located in the Town of Scriba, County of Oswego, NY.
ECT is interested in entering into a 40% limited partnership with no O&M
responsibility.  Don Stevens has learned that ECT has submitted their bid to
Sithe and is awaiting a response.

GREENFIELD CAPITAL PROJECTS

Offshore LNG Vaporization Terminal - California - Gus Eghneim (Enron Corp)
has been asked to manage environmental permitting for an offshore LNG
vaporization terminal in California.  Gus has agreed to keep Joe Kolb
informed and involved at the next meeting.  The project is in the very early
stages of consideration.

DEPARTMENT PROJECTS

Social Responsibility Risk Assessment Tool - Gavin Dillingham met with Lauren
Iannarone and they decided to add some more functionality to the database.
They will add a section for case studies, transaction cost and industry type.
Once this is done it will be populated and the prototype will be demonstrated
to interested Enron business units.

REGULATORY TECHNICAL ANALYSIS

Enron IT Employee Receives Ergonomics Relieve - Russell Tucker located a
workstation solution to allow the raising of the desk top in selectable
increments to provide back strain relieve to an Enron IT employee that is 6'
8" tall. The replacement desk will also allow the employee to remain in his
present location within his work group with the desk fitting within the
original desk space.

COMPETITIVE INTELLIGENCE & BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES

California Power Development -- NEPA Review -  Jeff Keeler and Mary Schoen
held a meeting with EWS/ENA West power developers to discuss a proposed
project in Roseville, CA.   Since the project must connect to the Western
Area Power Administration (WAPA) through a substation, WAPA is suggesting
that it may need to perform not only a NEPA analysis from the Enron project
to the substation, but on the entire WAPA grid, due to NEPA's mandate to
analyze "all downstream impact."   Jeff and Mary are working on strategies to
determine:  1) if it is legally feasible to conduct NEPA review just for the
Enron project portion so that Cal. Energy Commission process is not delayed
and 2)  if agencies involved in NEPA review will comply with Bush executive
orders mandating expedited review of power project permit applications.

Emissions Control Technology -- Clean Coal Funding - Jeff Keeler discussed
with EGM a preliminary strategy for pursuing DOE clean coal program funding
for a demonstration project or commercialization grant for the Clean
Solutions Group's "NOx Tech" pollution control technology.

Voluntary Greenhouse Gas Emissions Target Analysis - ; Lisa Jacobson and
Susan Worthen offered recommendations and analysis on voluntary greenhouse
gas emissions commitments to Mike Terraso.; Lisa continued to identify
opportunities and business activity related to greenhouse gas emissions
issues (Climate Neutral Network conference, GEMI conference).

Global Climate Change -  Lisa Jacobson continued to provide intelligence to
business units and corporate groups on climate change policy developments,
including:
Canada's negotiations with the EU and announcement that it may work to
support the Kyoto protocol
Japan's discussions with the US and EU, and resulting announcement that Japan
will not move forward with any climate change agreement without the US.
Delay in release of EU climate change policies (coordinated with Govt.
Affairs, Brussels/London)
US congressional activity on climate change

Sterling Energy/Renewable Desk - Stacey Bolton followed up w/CEO and COO from
Sterling Planet regarding the renewable desk potentially supplying them green
tags. Organized call between Sterling and ENA West for next week to explore
business opportunities.;; Stacey is working with Sarah Novosel (Reg Affairs,
Washington) to detail Enron's position before FERC regarding intermittency.;
Elliot Mainzer is speaking at;a FERC hearing;in July, and coordinating
position w/ Sarah.

ADVOCACY & COMMERCIAL SUPPORT

Multipollutant & New Source Review Strategies - Jeff Keeler and
representatives of the power generation industry met with EPA concerning its
90-day review of the NSR program and its proposed recommendations to the
White House.   The group briefed EPA staff from the Administrator's office,
Office of Air and Radiation, NSR Enforcement office and White House Council
of Economic Advisors on NSR concerns for new power development and our
proposed multipollutant solutions that could offer and alternative to NSR.

Global Climate Change - Lisa  Jacobosn and Jeff Keeler continued work on a
number of initiatives with commercial and corporate groups:
Congressional advocacy - Lisa represented Enron at a Climate Change lobby day
sponsored by several environmental groups. Enron was the only company to make
a formal presentation on its position on global climate change.  About 100
delegates were present, representing the scientific, religious, business and
environmental communities from Washington, New Mexico, Ohio, Florida,
Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Maine, New Hampshire, Michigan, and
Maryland.


Hello Eric Saibi,

 This is an automated email delivery.  The following info is for
 tracking purposes only:

 Transaction: 0000177322
 Fulfillment: 00202135*00002
 Location   : 00004

 Industrial Information Resources, Inc.
 Customer Service Department
 (713) 783-5147

 - OUTAGE.dbf


It was great to see a friendly face!  Don't ever hesitate to wave or stop in
and say hello.  Can you believe that I had been on the 30th floor since the
summer of 1994?!  I know that sets some kind of record at Enron!!  It is kind
of fun to be up here.  The appreciation for the jobs that we do in operations
has grown over the last several years, thanks to the hard work of you and so
many others.

My family is doing great.  The children start school tomorrow.  Meagan will
be a junior in high school -- we took a brief trip with her this summer for
an early look at some colleges.  It will be a big year for Amanda -- she
starts junior high in 6th grade.  And Tyler would tell you proudly that he is
"two and a half".  What a delight he continues to be!!

I know that Erin has worked hard.  I hope that she and her husband are doing
well.  --Sally

From:  Mary Griff Gray
     08/08/2000 08:51 AM

To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: excitement

Sally --

I acted impulsively when I saw you this a.m.  I was so excited to know you
were on the 33rd floor where I was picking up United Way shirts that I didn't
control my enthusiasm over seeing you.

I apologize if I disrupted you.

Griff

P.S.  I hope your family is doing fine.  Erin graduates in December from
UT-Dallas with her masters in Speech Path.  She and her husband are doing
very well and very much in love.


Michelle - I think Linda would fill the spot you and I talked about very
well.  Linda is the new head of our DC office; she was asst secy of treasury
under Bentsen, Rubin and Summers.  She is very well respected in
washington.  She received the Alexander Hamilton award fro Secy Summers --
the highest award presented by the US Treas dept.  She has gotten up to speed
very quickly on our issues and I think would serve the progam well (and she's
already paid for!!).
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 12/29/2000 05:30 PM -----

	Chris Long
	12/20/2000 10:54 AM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Law Conference

Linda and I made a courtesy visit to Jim Derrick last Friday.  Jim suggested
that we contact Michelle Cash about participating in the law conference on
the program.  I called Michelle to inquire about the program and she told me
that you and she had already spoken.  Linda is not seeking a place on the
program, but will be pleased to participate if our decides to make a
presentation.  Let us know how you want us to handle.

Thanks - Chris


Girl, so very sorry to hear about your relatives.  That is awful, such young
people.  I will keep them and all of their their families in prayer.  If
there is anything I can do to help, please let me know.  If you need help
with the kids or anything.

Also, sorry about the choir,  what's wrong with Doren, he's seems to be sick
alot.  Greg will probably "fire his ass" this week for messing up his "Big
Day" on Easter.  That's a shame!

You mean to tell me you wore the new dress without the blouse/jacket.  That
is wonderful, I told you not to worry about your arms.  You did look real
good in the dress, the colors were beautiful.
 We need to shop together more often.

Yes, I will be at choir tonight.

See you then!


Part of me is tempted to do the "taste of your own medicine" thing, but I was
really disappointed that he took that approach (in this case I think email is
very cowardly) and don't believe two wrongs make a right.  I insist on taking
the high road in this situation no matter how tempting it might be to teach
him a lesson.

Susan


[IMAGE]

April 24, 2001

Can't read this email? Click here
Issue#: e12004

PROVANTAGE Customer: jeff_dasovich@enron.com

To unsubscribe from the?
Original Advantage Click here
(Do Not Reply to this email)

Products that give you the Professional Advantage!

[IMAGE]
New Version!

Pervasive.SQL 2000i for NT/2000
By Pervasive Software

Spawned from the legendary Btrieve database, Pervasive.SQL 2000i is an
amazingly usable and versatile database. Packed inside its user-friendly skin
is a high-performance heart, making Pervasive.SQL 2000i not only easy to use,
but incredibly powerful and reliable. Pervasive.SQL is flexible enough to
power traditional and Web-based applications across a full spectrum of
hardware and software platforms.

10-USER??$939.45
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
Synergy II PCI 32MB 2D/3D Vidadpt Open GL
By ELSA Inc

The ELSA SynergyII is the powerful graphics solution for applications in
professional multi-screen graphics such as visualization, graphics
processing, ...More

??$221.95
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
New Version!

WordPerfect Office 2002 Standard
By Corel

Experience the latest performance innovations of the office suite you know
and love with WordPerfect Office 2002 Standard Edition. This powerful
software ...More

??$149.00
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
Onetouch 8650/ADF Flatbed Scanner
By Visioneer

The Visioneer OneTouch technology is changing the way people think about and
use scanners, thanks to its revolutionary integration of hardware and
software. ...More

??$257.95
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
New Version!

Easy CD Creator 5.0 Platinum
By Roxio, Inc.

Upgrade to Easy CD Creator 5 Platinum and go way beyond the software that
came with your CD recorder. Now you can burn and share anything on CD - your
...More

??$77.95
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
Switch 8-Port 10/100 8-RJ45
By D-Link

SPECIAL PROMO! LIMITED TIME!
Purchase a DSS-8+ and receive 2 FREE DFE-530TX!(Must Purchase DLNS00U to
receive the 2 FREE DFE-530TX) ...More

??$71.95
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
AirConnect 11 Mbps Wireless PCI Card
By 3Com

The 3Com AirConnect 11 Mbps Wireless PCI network interface card (NIC) gives
you the option of networking PCs at your office or home, without the time and
...More

??$223.95
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
New!

S600 Color BubbleJet Printer 15/10ppm 2400x1200dpi
By Canon

Professional Printing For Everyone.

Take your work and home projects to the next level. The S600 Color Bubble Jet
Printer offers ...More

??$202.25
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
All-In-Wonder Radeon AGP 32MB NTSC
By ATI Technologies

32MB Of DDR RAM, Fast 3D Graphics & DVD playback make it the best
price/performance in its class. With All-in-Wonder Radeon, capture and edit
MPEG-2 Video ...More

??$245.89
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
CM615 17in/16.1v 22mm 1280x1024 65HZ
By Hitachi

Hitachi's CM615 provides sharp focus, high brightness and a tight dot pitch
of 0.23mm horizontal, 0.14 mm vertical to provide the best value for any 17"
...More

??$177.95
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
PalmPix Zoom Digital Camera for Palm
By Kodak

The easiest way to make your Palm Handheld a digital camera.
Whether it's a must for business or just for fun, the KODAK PalmPix Camera
adds ...More

??$83.95
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
Microsoft Press

Microsoft Press books help you achieve maximum results with all your
Microsoft software.

?
?

Web Address: www.PROVANTAGE.com?
?Toll Free: 800-336-1166???? Fax: 330-494-5260???? email:
sales@provantage.com

Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | FREE Catalog

,2001 PROVANTAGE Corporation, 7249 Whipple Ave. NW, North Canton, OH 44720

Products, prices, terms, conditions, or offers may change at any time.
Company and/or product names are generally trademarks, or registered
trademarks of their respective companies. Some promotional text may be
copyrighted by the product's manufacturer.?

 The Original Advantage promotional email is delivered only to customers of
PROVANTAGE Corporation. PROVANTAGE customers have purchased products in the
past and submitted their email address as part of the checkout process. Or,
customers have entered their name in the "Add to Email List" box on the
PROVANTAGE.com home page. Any customer may unsubscribe from the list at any
time by going to http://www.provantage.com/unsubscribe.htm. The email address
is permanently removed from additional promotional electronic mailings, and
will not be reactivated unless requested by the customer.??

[IMAGE]

BizRate Customer Certified (GOLD) Site


John,

I noticed a different file name on this draft than the version Pete Thompson
sent out.  How is this version different from Pete's?  I sure hate to have
more than one version of this monster being vetted at the same time.

Thanks,

kay


---------------------- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 05/13/99
12:03 PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "ROLLAND SANDERS" <bwanarol@hotmail.com>
04/24/99 12:18 AM

To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT
cc:
Subject: numbnut!?

stooping so low as to hurl infantile insults at your youngest and
most freckled sibling?  when i get back stateside i fully intend to
show you the meaning of respect (upside your head), you ol' no
english pea eatin', medley molestin', 80 hours a week workin',
corporate slavin', too big house buyin', Hilton Head Renaissance
Weekend wannabe attendin', power tie wearin', Houston rationalizin',
adult-oriented rock easy listenin', chilluns with mutant voices
sirin' and coke bottle-itis lookin' knucklehead!

the matter of the telephone # is one of some confusion at the moment,
for mama claims she cannot reach me.  for a long while the following
was it:

001 81 06 696 2566

but this year osakatown added an extra number, a 6, making it:

001 81 06 6696 2566

it should be no worry, and inside merry old nippon it has not been.
mama has problems, but they should not be from this side.  joel
reached me two weeks ago.

would like to hear from you, brotherman, but hurry not.  i am going
nowhere anytime soon.  later for you -

rolland

ps - hakeem's decline must be sad to watch.  is it knees?

>From: "Richard B Sanders" <rsander@ect.enron.com>
>To: "ROLLAND SANDERS" <bwanarol@hotmail.com>
>Subject: Re: what the...?
>Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 07:58:36 -0500
>
>
>
>what is your telephone #---you numbnut
>
>

_______________________________________________________________
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com


he's cute.  Congratulations!!


I hope Carol will come!  Holly was going to call her.

	"Patti Young" <pyoung@cliverunnells.com>
	03/22/2001 01:35 PM

		 To: <Tana.Jones@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Saturday

I will probably run around 6 a.m., but IHOP is a strong possibility.  Can
Carol come, too?

-----Original Message-----
From: Tana.Jones@enron.com [mailto:Tana.Jones@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 3:40 PM
To: Patti Young
Subject: RE: Saturday

Holly & I are going running Saturday at 7, then meeting Lucinda for
breakfast at the IHOP at 8.  Do you want to join us?


I thought that you're going to be at pacbell park all weekend.


I thought Derek was great.

	Peter Keohane 05/14/2001 11:53 AM 	   To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES  cc: Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT  Subject: New Counsel - Derek Flaman

I would like to get back to Derek on his trip to Houston last week.  We (Canada) have signed off, including commercial approval from Milnthorp and Cross, subject to satisfactory interviews in Houston.  Note:  Jim Derrick was not available but have scheduled May 25 to send Derek back to Houston to meet with Jim.  Peter.


what kind of inside info?


Partnership
Spurs Enron
Equity Cut
---
Vehicle Is Connected
To Financial Officer
By Rebecca Smith and John R. Emshwiller

10/18/2001
The Wall Street Journal
Page C1
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)
Enron Corp. shrank its shareholder equity by $1.2 billion as the company decided to repurchase 55 million of its shares that it had issued as part of a series of complex transactions with an investment vehicle connected to its Chief Financial Officer Andrew S. Fastow.
Enron didn't disclose the big equity reduction in its earnings release issued on Tuesday, when the Houston-based energy giant announced a $1.01 billion charge to third-quarter earnings that produced a $618 million loss. But the company briefly mentioned it in a subsequent call with security analysts and confirmed it in response to questions yesterday. As a result of the reduction, Enron's shareholder equity has dropped to $9.5 billion, the company said.
In an interview Tuesday, Enron Chairman Kenneth Lay said that about $35 million of the $1.01 billion charge to earnings was related to transactions with LJM2 Co-Investment LP, a limited partnership created and run by Mr. Fastow. In a conference call yesterday with investors, Mr. Lay said that the 55 million shares had been repurchased by Enron, as the company "unwound" its participation in the transactions. In the third quarter, the company's average number of shares outstanding was 913 million.
According to Rick Causey, Enron's chief accounting officer, these shares were contributed to a "structured finance vehicle" set up about two years ago in which Enron and LJM2 were the only investors. In exchange for the stock, the entity provided Enron with a note. The aim of the transaction was to provide hedges against fluctuating values in some of Enron's broadband telecommunications and other technology investments. Mr. Causey didn't elaborate on what form those hedges took.
Subsequently, both the value of Enron's stock and the value of the broadband investments hedged by the entity dropped sharply. As a result, Enron decided essentially to dissolve the financing vehicle and reacquire the shares. When Enron reacquired the shares, it also canceled the note it had received from the entity.
In addition, Enron was receiving increasing criticism from analysts and major shareholders concerning the apparent conflict of interest involving the role of its chief financial officer in the partnership, from which he stood to make millions of dollars. In July, Mr. Fastow formally severed his connections to LJM. Mr. Fastow has declined to be interviewed.
Given all the complexities of the LJM-related financing vehicle and the questions it raised outside the company, "the confusion factor wasn't worth the trouble of trying to continue this," Mr. Causey said.
Enron downplayed the significance of the share-reduction exercise. Mark Palmer, an Enron spokesman, described it "as just a balance-sheet issue" and therefore wasn't deemed "material" for disclosure purposes.
Jeff Dietret, an analyst for Simmons & Co. in Houston, said that a large reduction of equity could be "a flag for the rating agencies" because it could adversely affect a company's debt-to-equity ratio. Enron said yesterday that as a result of the equity reduction, its debt-to-equity ratio rose to 50% from 46% previously.
On Tuesday, after Enron reported its big quarterly loss, Moody's Investors Service Inc. put Enron's long-term debt on review for a possible downgrade. Moody's said the move was related to "significant write-downs and charges reflecting substantially reduced valuations" in several of Enron's businesses. In recent years, Enron had moved aggressively into broadband telecommunications and the water business, both of which failed to produce expected returns.
Enron, which as of June 30 had $33.6 billion in current liabilities and long-term debt, has lately been attempting to shed assets to pay down debt.


Narottam,

I have in fact not received a copy of the report.  Was this something you
sent by e-mail?  If so, please resend it to me so that I could make the
appropriate comments.  Please do this asap, since I have been waiting for
this report to give my comments for some time now.

Regards,
Sandeep.

"Narottam Aul" <naul@hesinet.com> on 05/06/2001 08:25:53 PM
Please respond to <naul@hesinet.com>
To: <Sandeep.Kohli@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Dabhol Report

Sandeep

Trust you have had the opportunity to review the  draft of the Dabhol Report
that was sent on 24 April 2001. I assume that the  circulation of the report
to the relevant people within Dabhol and Enron has  been done at your end. It
will be helpful if all comments are collated and send  through you. The
report can then be amended to incorporate your comments and a  final version
sent for your records. We would very much to close the assignment  with the
completion of the report.

Please do let me know, if we can do  any further analysis and sensitivities
to assist Enron and Dabhol in the  existing phase of discussions with MSEB
and the State Government.

Best  regards
Narottam

Narottam Aul
Henwood Energy Services Inc.
26 Greenhill  Road
Wayville SA 5034
Australia

Tel : +61 8 8179 2006
Fax : +61  8 8179 2099
Mobile : 0421 061 016


This is another reason why the HR and A/A program don't like each other.
It's absurd that our personnell functions don't share resources.  I'm almost
of the opinion that these two groups should be folded together.

Jeff
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 10/04/2000
05:58 PM ---------------------------
From: Suzanne Farrow@EES on 10/04/2000 04:45 PM
To: Kristin Gandy/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Wharton Interviews

Kate Wagner (Thunderbird) was supposed to have been taken off this list

The list was also supposed to have been updated 2 months ago to reflect that
Neville Ravji, Tiffany Wright, and Ben Creighton have left the company.
Betsy Bassis and Steve Pirozzi are physically located in London.

Are you sure you're pulling from the most up-to-date list?

Suzanne

Kristin Gandy@ENRON
10/04/2000 03:56 PM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael J Popkin/NA/Enron@Enron, Peggy
Determeyer/Corp/Enron@Enron, Laura Howenstine/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Bryan Kite/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Michele
Nezi Marvin/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Neville Ravji/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Suzanne Farrow/HOU/EES@EES, Sarah
Wesner/Corp/Enron@Enron, Patrick Conner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jayshree
Desai/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Dutta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew Goering/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kenneth Horton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kathleen
Wagner/NA/Enron@Enron, Betsy Bassis/CA/Enron@Enron, Lisa
Connolly/NA/Enron@Enron, Ben Creighton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Brad
Hitch/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Colin Jackson/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Gillian Johnson/NA/Enron@Enron, William
Keeney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jebong Lee/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Stephen Pirozzi/LON/ECT@ECT, cwang2@enron.com, Tiffany Wright/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Rodney Malcolm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer
Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT, John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kyle Kitagawa/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Natalie Halich/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Sean A
Holmes/HOU/EES@EES, Jordan Mintz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Li Sun/NA/Enron@Enron, Teresa
Dyar/NA/Enron@Enron, Kyu-Bong Lee/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Wharton Interviews

Hello Wharton/Penn Team!

Can you believe interviews are just around the corner.

So that we are fully prepared for the November 9th and 10th interviews dates
a team meeting will be held on:

Monday October 9th at 2:00pm in room 11C2

In the meeting we will review resumes that have been received for our
pre-select list and coordinate any further campus events. Also, in the
meeting we will select the people who will conduct first and second round
interviews.  So if you would like to interview please plan on attending this
meeting.   I look forward to seeing you all there.

Thank You,

Kristin Gandy
Associate Recruiter
Associate/Analyst Program
713-345-3214


Not too late, I have to pay for the rooms a week from today.  Hurry, hurry,
Talk to you soon.
PL


The report named: East P/L Totals <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=1&report_name=East+P/L+Totals&category_cd=1&category_name=EAST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=1&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=11/21/2001>, published as of 11/21/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


I have reviewed the La Plata Facilities O&O Agreement.  Lee, could you please review the same and see if you agree with this assessment?  It appears to me that the pigging facilties could qualify as either of the following:

Special Services.  This would be subject to prior written consent and agreement between the Operator (TW) and the Operating Committee (TW & NWPLRepresentatives).  If NWPL agreed, their share of the cost would be in proportion to their ownership interest.  If we did obtain their approval, future O&M cost attributable to the pigging facilities could be shared among the owners.  (We've agreed to a flat fee for 2000 through 2003 with a 3.5% escalator starting in 2001.)

Addition or Expansion.  Demonstrate that the pigging will add incremental transmission capacity. We have to give notice to NWPL and they have 60 days to participate.  If they participate, they share in the cost at their ownership interest, but they get a share of the incremental capacity at their ownership interest.  If they don't indicate a desire to participate in 60 days, we can proceed with the Expansion (without any approval, but also no cost sharing).  Also, any incremental O&M associated with an expansion cannot be passed on to any owners not participating in such expansion.

I think if we went the Special Services route, we would need to justify the need for these facilities to maintain the integrity and efficiency of the facilities at current levels.  I think we would spend alot of time arguing this with them and in the end they would probably approve it subject to them not incurring any cost.  (They probably don't have $260,000 ($1.5MM * .174) sitting around in a budget somewhere that they'd like to fork over for these facilities.)  Rich, what do you think?  How difficult would it be to demonstrate that these facilities are necessary for maintaining the current operating levels of the facilities?

Recommendation:  To save us the 60 days notice period of an Expansion, I think we should notify them that it's a necessary Special Service and ask for approval (& to pass along their share of the cost), but to be prepared to eat 100% of the costs to obtain their timely approval and proceed with the installation of the facilities.  In this event we would need to agree on the inclusion of future O&M attributable to these facilities.

FYI, their ownership interest is still officially 22.3% since they have not executed the Amendment that has been tendered to them 3 times, first by me and twice by Lynn Blair.  If	they execute the Amendment that incorporates the 4/1/98 expansion of the facilities, their ownership interest will be 17.4%.


Daren,

The following Logistics personnel will be in the office on Tuesday:

 Mary Poorman
 Mark McCoy
 Eddie Janzen
 Tom Acton
 Aimee Lannou

If you think we need more or less people, please let me know and I will keep
the group informed.

Thanks,

Mary


Sounds fine to me. Does it make sense to run resume past Brown and Sherriff prior to bringing him over? Also, is the idea he would be a director, sr director or vp? Each of these paths has consequences as you know. Rick


Please have a look at this and see if you spot anything that needs to be added. I'd like to add our gas quality specs and equipment specs mentioned in Sect. 3.3.

Next I want to circulate to engineering and operations for comment.

Thanks,

Paul


Okay gang,

Here is the final version.  Some issues you may want to look at:

#2

I kept my interpretation of the extraordinary nature of the inventory
write-down.  I put in a lot of language that we would need to look at the
history of the industry to see how unusual and infrequent a change of that
nature would be.  If you all disagree I will change it to not be an
extraordinary item.

#3

I removed the sale of property from Jeff's spreadsheet.  On page 354 of the
book it says that "other gains or losses from sale or abandonment of
property, plant, and equipment used in a business" is never an
extraordinary item.

#4
Since there was not a consensus on how to deal with the litigation
costs.  I put in a few sentences that handle both circumstances.  Please
look at it and ensure that it makes sense.

Anyway, here it is.  Send me any last minute changes to this email address
by noon and I will print it out at lunch for class tomorrow.

Dylan

 - Agrofeed Final Version.doc