TO:   JGS Faculty and Staff

>X-From_: owner-alldepts@listserv.rice.edu Tue Jan 22 11:09 CST 2002
>X-X-Sender:  <glratt@san-gabriel.is.rice.edu>
>X-foo-then-bar-then: baz
>Date:         Tue, 22 Jan 2002 10:36:03 -0600
>Reply-To: hostmaster@rice.edu
>Sender: ALLDEPTS -- Rice University Departments
>               <ALLDEPTS@listserv.rice.edu>
>From: Network Management <hostmaster@rice.edu>
>Subject:      Scheduled Rice Network outage Thursday 24 Jan
>Comments: To: alldepts@rice.edu
>To: ALLDEPTS@listserv.rice.edu
>
>On Thursday, 24 January 2002, from 12:01-1:00 a.m., the Rice Network
>Management department will be performing maintenance on the campus
>connections to the outside world, and core components of Rice's
>internal network. Both intra-campus and off-campus connections
>should be considered unreliable during this period.
>
>Please direct any questions about this outage to hostmaster@rice.edu .
>
>Sincerely,
>--
>                                 Rice University Network Management

Suzana G. Vazquez
Staff Assistant
Jesse H. Jones Graduate School
      of Management
ramos@rice.edu
(713) 348-3736


-----Original Message-----
From: Stein, Neil [mailto:neil.stein@csfb.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 8:09 AM
To: undisclosed-recipients
Subject: IPP Update: Analysis of Power Market Conditions
IndicatesSelling Was Overdone; Focus on CPN and MIR

Good Morning,

Attached, please find our latest update on the IPP sector, which includes an
analysis of recent power market conditions

 <<IPPupdate072501.pdf>>

1. Focus on CPN and MIR   On July 24, 2001, our IPP composite traded off 8%,
owing to heightened market concerns surrounding "soft" spot and forward
power prices.  We believe the weakness presents a buying opportunity across
the whole section and recommend that investors focus on our top 2 picks:
Calpine (CPN, Strong Buy) and Mirant (MIR, Buy).

2. Power Market Analysis   In this note we include an analysis of recent
power market conditions.  We conclude that power market conditions have been
more stable than is generally believed.  Further, if conditions had
worsened, the earnings impact would not be severe.  On that basis we believe
the sell-off across the sector was overdone.

3. Beware of National Power Indices!   In order to properly analyze recent
power price fluctuations, it is key to analyze the California market
separately.  Outside of California, spark spreads have actually increased by
2.7% on average since May in a number of key markets.  Within California,
there have been large declines in pricing and margins.  However, potential
returns on capital in that market remain well above anywhere else in the
country.

4. IPPs are not Call Options on Power Prices!   The bulk of the group has
contracted substantial portions of their output.  In particular, Calpine has
sold forward 90% of its output in 2001 and 80% in 2002

5. Current Valuations Reflect the Investor Uncertainties   2001 and 2002 P/E
multiples have compressed by more than 40% year to date

6. Buy on Weakness  To the extent earnings prospects remain intact, we view
the recent weakness as irrational.

Regards,

Neil Stein   212/325-4217
Bryan Sifert   212/325-3906

This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information.  No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the
sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve
the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.  Any
views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except
where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state
them to be the views of any such entity.
Unless otherwise stated, any pricing information given in this message is
indicative only, is subject to change and does not constitute an offer to
deal at any price quoted.
Any reference to the terms of executed transactions should be treated as
preliminary only and subject to our formal written confirmation.


I have 3 addtional candidates for consideration:

Seung-taek Oh (Associate - Credit Derivatives)
Scott Loving   (East Logistics)
Eric Boyt   ( Gas Structuring)

From: Karen Buckley/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/08/2001 01:42 PM
To: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: trading track candidate

Thanks, I have sent him a note notifying him and requsting his resume.

Thx. kb.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Neal, Scott
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 1:36 PM
To: Buckley, Karen
Cc: Lavorato, John
Subject: trading track candidate

I would like Joe Casas (currently East logistics) to participate in the
interview process.
---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 05/08/2001 01:34 PM
---------------------------
From: John J Lavorato/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/02/2001 04:36 PM
To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Berney C
Aucoin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris
Gaskill/ENRON@enronXgate, Doug Gilbert-Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mike
Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rogers Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, Louise Kitchen/LON/ECT@ECT,
John J Lavorato/ENRON@enronXgate, Thomas A Martin/ENRON@enronXgate, Ed
McMichael/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jim Schwieger/ENRON@enronXgate, Hunter S Shively/ENRON@enronXgate, Fletcher J
Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martin Thomas/Enron@EUEnronXgate, Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Karen Buckley/LON/ECT@ECT, Neil Davies/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject:

We were thinking of having another interview session for the Trading Tract
later this month.   I've been screening outside resumes but internally we
haven't received many suggestions from each of you about other people already
at Enron.  If you think anyone could qualify send the name to Karen Buckley.
If we don't have enough candidates, we will wait until the new analysts and
associates arrive and do a session then.

Lavo


[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
Plus                             7 other reasons to shop  early

[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]

8.

FREE                             SHIPPING on all  orders over $100, through
November                             22.
?

7.

We've                             teamed  up with Toysrus.com  to offer you
toys and savings so massive, even  our                             North Pole
competitors are envious.
?

6.
Create                           a Wish List      at Amazon.com and you just
might win everything on  it--up                           to $5,000. Woo-hoo!
?
5.
By                           shopping early at  Amazon.com,  you eliminate
stress. Carolers won't seem nearly  as                           irritating.
?
4.
Though                           reindeer are  cute, our delivery service is
more reliable.                           And  no fog delays.
?
3.
                           You can browse through all 17 of our  stores
without                           being accosted by a persistent  perfume
sales clerk.
?
2.
                           Free parking.
?
1.
SHIPPING                           IS FREE on  orders of $100 or more. (Our
Head Elf made                           us say  that again.)

[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE][IMAGE][IMAGE]
[IMAGE]

For the Fine               Print follow the  links below:

Wish List        Contest Rules

Free Shipping               Offer

We hope  you               enjoyed receiving this message. However, if you'd
rather  not receive               future e-mails of this sort from
Amazon.com,  please visit your Amazon.com     account page and under the Your
Account Settings heading,  click               the "Update your communication
preferences" link.

Please   note that this message was sent to the  following e-mail address:
lcampbel@enron.com


Stephanie,

Here's a new version.   I had a problem with dates in the Secondary Pricing
Term Section.  This version has the year 2001 inserted in place of 2000.

Steve


Warning!~!
This e-mail has tons of info...

Weather Website
Weather Presentation
WRMA Info.

Weather Website:
www.weather-risk.com

Weather Presentation:

SECOND ANNUAL WRMA CONVENTION

    The second Annual Convention of WRMA will be held
 June 7-9, 2000 in Southhampton, Bermuda. It is expected
 to be attended by representatives of over 100 companies
 engaged in weather risk management. The program will
 include informative seminars, speakers, and opportunities
 for networking. On June 8th the program begins early with
 registration, continental breakfast, and end-user panel
 discussions...and more!
www.wrma.org

RESERVATIONS

 Sonesta Beach Resort Bermuda
 Southampton, Bermuda
 P.O. Box HM 1070 Hamilton, HMEX Bermuda
 441.238.8122
 441.238.8463 - fax
 www.sonesta.com

 June 7-9, 2000
 $229 single/double
 $259 triple occupancy
 $289 quad occupancy
 Guestroom rates are subject to government taxes,
 currently 7.25% BLOCK IS: WEATHER RISK MANAGEMENT
 ASSOCIATION HOTEL CUT-OFF DEADLINE IS: 4/21/2000
 SLEEPING ROOMS ARE TO BE GUARANTEED BY A
 TWO-NIGHT DEPOSIT. THE DEPOSIT IS NON-REFUNDABLE
 IF THE RESERVATION IS CANCELED LESS THAN 15 DAYS IN
 ADVANCE AND IN THE EVENT OF EARLY DEPARTURE.


Joanie called Kara at CES about deal 282945.  This is the CGAS citygate gas
for Energy Express.  We are selling the gas to CES and CES is reselling it to
Energy Express.  Kara told Joanie that she does not expect the volumes to
change on this deal.

Scott needs to work on the capacity sheet so we can tell how much transport
CES actually has.  There should be some big changes in CES's transport
numbers for June.  (Ex  ENA purchased the BG&E capacity on contract
k#65403).  Also, if ENA elected to release CES capacity to Clinton or IGS,
we need to make sure we record that correctly on the ENA sheet.  Any credits
we show on the CES sheet will be passed thru to CES.


Thanks for taking the time to give me your input on the analyst program.  It
will help to have that info in my meeting on Friday.


Tana:

Thank you for the phone call. I have spoken with Curtis Smith; and it seems
the Limits Contract Report has likely been reflecting the wrong positions for
quite some time. I apologize for this problem--as I was unaware. I will
remain in contact with you, Curtis and Mark in the next few days as we work
to find a more efficient and reliable way of reporting our positions. Please
do not hesitate to contact me with any questions, concerns or (ideally)
solutions.

Regards.
Tobin


The EES summary sheet is now in P/Realtime/EES/EES FEB.  Just copy the EES
deals over from the Inc. Sheet. Do not copy any colums past the Sell Price
colum as it is not necessary for EES to have all our Info.

Geir


Congrats to all.  Jeff and I believe that EOL is a vital part of growing our
businesses and your focus is appreciated.
mike

To: John Massey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kevin McGowan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A
Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: EOL Trades - August

Nice job, John.  Keep the volumes and information flows growing - $$$ will
follow.

George

John Massey
09/01/2000 01:50 PM
To: Kevin McGowan, George McClellan
cc:
Subject: EOL Trades - August

 August EOL EmissionsTrades exceeded projections and posted another record
trade month. We continue to show signs of strong trade growth and gaining
market share. I am hopeful that Arizona Public Service & Conectiv will use
the system more heavily in the future (hedge option trades) and that we can
obtain at least one new counterparty a month vis-.-vis EOL marketing/and or
our own internal marketing.  Our gain in market share has not gone
unchallenged. Bloombergs Powermatch system has been more active in the last
month and bid/ask spreads continue to narrow. To combat this we continue to
show (90% of the time) the tightest markets and obviously offer a cost
advantage over the Broker market & Bloomberg.   The increase in EOL volume
has increased liquidity in the whole market.  I am hopeful that overall
market volumes continue to grow as we get closer to compliance.

Number of Trades: 77
Number of Allowances: 192,500
Approx. Notional Trade Value: $28,875,000


This e-mail will confirm the new time for the site visit by your company at
LV Cogen I & II.  The relevant information is as follows:

	LV Cogen
Site Visit Date	Monday, October 16, 2000
Site Visit Time	8:00 AM to 12:00 PM
Directions to Hotels/Site	See DealBench - LV Cogen (Section V through End) Due Diligence
List/Plant Pictures Section
Meeting Time/Place	Las Vegas Cogen
	1701 East Alexander Road
	North Las Vegas, NV  89030

	Meet Bill Williams at 8:00 AM
Enron Site Visit Coordinator	Bill Williams
	503.464.8958 (O)
	503.704.9801(M)
	bill.williams@enron.com
Enron Site Visit Team	Bill Williams
	Dan Hammonds
	Mark Mullen
	Plant Manager
	Plant Engineer

Pursuant to the Site Visit Procedures sent you by CSFB, if you have not
already done so, please send me the following:
List of your team members and titles
For outside consultants, state their employer
Name, phone number (office and mobile) and e-mail address of your designated
deal team leader

Lastly, I will serve as the due diligence coordinator for LV Cogen I & II,
handling all questions and responses.  Should you have any due diligence
questions or require copies of any oversized documents, please contact me at
713.345.8992.


Holli:

I have still not received the above-mentioned comments.  I have also not
received EWEB's proposed form of legal opinion.  I will go ahead and
blackline the Schedule once again.

When the lawyers last spoke, we agreed to execute all docs prior to the end
of the year.

Would you please call EWEB and inquire about these items?

Thanks.  Sara


--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=JFORNEY>
Date: Thursday, August 9, 2001 10:01:00 GMT
Subject:


E-Next Generation LLC
Mr. Jody Pierce
1400 Smith, EB 2480
Houston, Tx 77002


With the final comment from Sullivan & Cromwell:


We parked some length with EL Paso for this morning (04/11) at PV.  We need
to sell the energy at PV.  The length is in Enpower already.  Please make the
sale at PV under ST-SW.  Aepco, MWD, TNP and LDWP should be buying.  The
price for deal #577883 goes in the model...not the price you sold it at.

EPE length is in Enpower, deal# 577883, this will be out in RT Position
Manager.  56mws for the day.
The schedule is as follows:

HE 1 8 mws
HE2 8 mws
HE3 8 mws
HE4 8mws
HE5 8mws
HE6 10mws
HE24 6mws

TOTAL  = 56mws

Please sell this power real time.
Check with the dispatchers EARLY, Lisa Gang's sheet shows everything you need.

Call Holdenn or myself with any questions.
Thanks,
Bill


Mark,

Long time no see - I hope you're doing well despite the difficult times we're in.

Enron Europe Limited entered into administration earlier today, but nobody seems to have much idea or can render any information about the faith of the captioned company and its Nordic power trading business.  We are thus pretty much in the dark over here and I wonder if you can you advise us or direct us to somebody that can.  Thanks.

Martin


Donna our scheduler for Southern Conn and Yankee says this guy had some.
---------------------- Forwarded by Brian Perrone/CES/ColumbiaGas on
01/28/2000
04:19 PM ---------------------------

Donna Jones
01/26/2000 01:37 PM

To: Brian Perrone/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc:
Subject: Re: 1/27 AGT volumes

Devin Gordan at Energy East has located supply for me for SCG, YGS,  and CNG.
Call him at 713-626-2426.

Brian Perrone
01/26/2000 12:35 PM

To: Marianne Stiles/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc: Donna Jones/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
Subject: Re: 1/27 AGT volumes

Donna,

Please let me know if you hear of any capacity available for Feb-00 on Tenn
Z6.  If possible, we want to try to buy capacity or delivered gas past our
furthest delivery point on Tenn so you can back-haul your needs.

Brian

Marianne Stiles
01/26/2000 12:31 PM

To: Donna Jones/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc: Brian Perrone/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
Subject: 1/27 AGT volumes

Just got off of the phone with Enron.   Due to the meter bounce that they are
doing because of the restriction, there will be a  reduction @ the gate (meter
#52) of 370 dth.   Donna, you originally requested 2050 dth, it will now be
1680 dth.   I have been told that you should see the entire 1680 dth.
Unfortunately, you will have to redo your Boston noms.

Here is the file

 - agt012000.xls


Credit Union Offers Flood Relief Loans
Our thoughts and support go out to all Enron employees who have been affected by our recent flooding.  Enron Federal Credit Union would like to assist those employees who may be in need of financial assistance with a Signature Loan or Auto Loan.

Two types of special Flood Relief Loans* are available including:

?	Signature Loans* for a 6 month term, single pay plan, at a 5.00% Fixed APR, and $10,000 maximum.

?	Auto Loans** are available at 6.49% Fixed APR on all conventional loan terms, with a 90-Day No Payment Option.

Apply on-line, 24x7 at enronfcu.com, then select Anytime Loans and the loan type.  Please type Flood Relief in the Purpose of Loan Field.  Or, call Anytime Loans at 800.235.8763 and reference our Flood Relief Loan.  For more information, please e-mail efcu@enron.com or call our Lending Department at x30578.

*Must be a Credit Union member to apply. Unpaid loans must pay interest due after 6 months, and renew on monthly payments at the regular lobby rate at time of renewal. **Term will be extended and finance charges will continue to accrue during the 90-day period. Subject to normal underwriting requirements. Auto Balloon Notes and current loans are excluded from this offer. No other discounts apply. EFCU is an Equal Housing Lender & NCUA Insured. Offers end July 15, 2001.

Water Damaged Vehicle Inspection Service Available
Due to the recent flooding in our area, many of you may now be in the market to buy a new or used vehicle. To help ensure you do not unknowingly purchase a new or used vehicle that has been flood damaged, please call our service partner, Auto Exam. Auto Exam will send a  technician to your location to perform a bumper-to-bumper inspection on the vehicle, and provide you with a detailed report on the condition of the vehicle. Complete inspections are available for $109.00. Call 713.944.2944 for an appointment today, or visit our web site at enronfcu.com and select Auto Center for more information.


fyi, more on David Merrill's work product, as well as being a regulatory
issue of interest.   mcs
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT on 05/11/2000
11:17 ---------------------------

David Merrill@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
04/11/2000 12:02
To: Robbi Rossi@EES, Michelle Hicks@Enron Communications,
<donald_lassere@enron.net>, Anthony Duenner@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS,
<bill_white@enron.net>
cc: Wayne Gardner/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Mark
Schroeder@ECT, <xi_xi@enron.net>, <roger_estrada@enron.net>, Jae-Moo
Lee@ENRON, Craig Clark@Enron Communications, Stephen D
Burns/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mike Dahlke/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Korea: Regulatory Impediment to Bandwidth Trading / Action Plan

Our regulatory review team in Korea this week has identified a major
regulatory
 impediment to bandwidth trading in Korea.   This describes the problem and
 outlines a draft strategy to deal with it, with actions shown in blue.

Problem:

It appears that under the Telecommunications Business Law (as interpreted by
the
Korea Communications Commission in a recent ruling against MCI), a Specific
Services
Provider Type 1 (which we want to be) cannot resell International Private
Leased Circuits
wholesale.   Only a Facilities Based provider (Network Services Provider) can
do resale of
International Leased Lines under the current law.  We do not want to be a
Network Services Provider because an NSP can not exceed 49% foreign ownership
and has immense responsibilities.

Factual Background:

We want to be a specific services provider Type 1 (reseller with facilities
such
as servers and switches).  Under the law as interpreted in the recent ruling,
however, SSPs:

    -  can buy or lease international lines only from NSPs.
    -  cannot sell International Private Leased Circuits to other SSPs,
         to Value-Added Service Providers (VSPs), or to ISPs.
    -  can sell international capacity only to end users, not to other
wholesalers.

The recent ruling came about when MCI (not a Network Service Provider) leased
international lines from an NSP in Korea and resold them to Goldman Sachs for
traffic
to Hong Kong.    Korea Telecom brought  a case against MCI to the Korea
Communications
Council (KCC) for decision.   Kim and Chang, our Enron energy lawyers in
Korea, handled
the case (they did not disclose to us that MCI was the client).

The KCC ruled  for KT and against MCI.   I'm not sure yet why Goldman Sachs
was
treated as a wholesaler and not an end user which should have been legal.  At
this point, however,
the situation is that if a foreign company tried to resell IPLCs wholesale,
any local NSP could bring a
complaint to the KCC,  and would run the regulatory risk of being forced to
cease.
(The sources for this conclusion are Kim and Chang, the Ministry of Info and
Communications,
and the Korea Information Society Institute, a telecom policy think tank for
the Ministry.)

Options:

(1)  Change the law.   A revision of the law is drafted but does not fix this
and changes
      are closed for this year.  Amendments on the floor of Parliament are
impossible in Korea.
      For a change in law, we would have to try in summer 2001 to get a
change in early 2002.
      Change by Presidential Decree is also possible but is overkill.   Not
feasible.

(2)  Get a new interpretation from the Korea Communications Council that says
what we
       plan to do in Korea in bandwidth is OK.

             We would ask Kim and Chang to present our proposed plans to the
KCC
             before we enter the bandwidth trading (BWT) market.  We would
describe
             it in a way that is sufficiently different from the MCI case.
Jae Moo made
             this suggestion.

              Pro:  If we get a favorable ruling we are in business.  We do
not have money
                      at risk unless the regulatory road is clear.

              Con:  an unfavorable ruling slams the door specifically on us.

              Recommended Steps:

                    (1)   We should explore this option with Kim and Chang.

                    Robbi or Michelle:  if you agree, please contact Kim and
Chang to discuss this
                    and authorize start of this work if they agree with this
approach.   I will work with
                    you to develop the scope of work and can operate with Kim
and Chang during the
                    work as necessary.

                    (2)  We will contact MCI to get more facts on their case
including whether
                    they were selling to a wholesaler who sold to Goldman or
directly to Goldman.
                    We can say the Ministry mentioned their case.  We should
probably not be thinking
                    about joint action with MCI at this point as we want to
say our case is different if we
                    can.   I will explore facts with an MCI contact in Tokyo
and Craig will do same
                    in Singapore.

(3)  Redefine where a sale of IPLCs takes place to have it not be in Korea.
Would
      need legal/commercial creative analysis.   Possible but uncertain
option.

(4)  Redefine the product so as not to be a re-sale:   If we buy capacity and
chop it up
      into smaller pieces or alter it before we sell it, maybe we are not
re-selling what we
      bought.  But we may still have a problem if the new product is sold to
wholesalers.

               Let's explore 3 and 4 above and similar ideas in a conference
call.
               Robbi, can you set up a call on this with me, Donald,
you/Michelle,
               Wayne Gardner, Craig Clark, Roger Estrada, Xi Xi ?

(5)  Partner/j-v with a local firm already having the NSP status such as KT,
      SK Telecom, Dacom, etc., or become an NSP.  49% foreign ownership
restirction.
      Huge regulatory filing.    Not feasible.

Parallel Actions:

(1 ) Take issue up with US Trade Representative (telecom) in DC (Jonathan
McHale).
      Also work with local Amcham telecom committee and US Embassy.

               We should do this in parallel with whatever option we choose.
I will work on this
               with Steve Burns in DC when we are farther along.

 (2) Work to  promote understanding of the merits of BWT for Korea/elsewhere.

               BWT was never contemplated in the laws and regulations. All our
               contacts said BWT needed to be explained more widely in Korea
to gain
               support.   It is new even to the telecom think tanks.   We
need to do
               missionary work on this to develop public opinion.   We need
to find
               a noted PhD economist who is a great communicator who can
speak to the
               think tanks in Korea, Singapore, Japan, etc. and give
interviews on
               the merits of BWT for efficiency, promoting investment, etc.
This will
               create the climate for regulators to change.  I have one
possibility in mind
               but suggestions of names welcome.  I will propose this
separately to
               Anthony later.

David


Dear PIRA Client:

The following Current News & Analysis articles have been published on
PIRA's website:

1) OPEC Set To Cut 1+ MMB/D With Likely Dec. 1 Start Date
2) Speculative Short Selling Hammers Crude Oil Prices, But For How Long?

Please go to http://www.pira.com

These articles can be found in the client section of PIRA's website. You
will need a PIRA Online account in order to gain access. For account
information please contact Dyana Rothman, drothman@pira.com

Best regards,

PIRA Energy


Here is the information produced in the study for Marc de la Roche.

-Kevin K.

---------------------- Forwarded by Kevin Kindall/Corp/Enron on 12/20/2000
05:42 PM ---------------------------

Kevin Kindall
11/28/2000 09:29 AM
To: Russell Dyk/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: JCC study

---------------------- Forwarded by Kevin Kindall/Corp/Enron on 11/28/2000
09:32 AM ---------------------------

Kevin Kindall
09/29/2000 05:11 PM
To: James Pyke/AP/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: JCC study

 Hello.  Please read the JCC note.  Feedback welcome.

-Kevin K.


I want to ask a question for e:speak today but I don't want my name put on the question.

There are some internet gurus working on e:mail from Mars.  I would like to know if Enron has plans on getting involved in  interplanetary communication.

Tomorrow will be here faster than you think!

Thank you for your valued and important time and my privacy.

Diana


> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Ola Jane Gow [SMTP:olajane@forestweb.com]
> Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 6:33 PM
> To:	newsbeat@forestweb.com
> Subject:	Weyerhaeuser raising NBSK pulp price for Nov. 1
>
> Breaking news on Forestweb:  http://www.forestweb.com
>
>
> *********
>
> Weyerhaeuser raising NBSK pulp price for Nov. 1
>
>
> *********
>
>
>
>
> --
> ********************************************************************
>           LOG * CHIP * PULP * PAPER PRICES on Forestweb
> http://www.forestweb.com/pricebeat
> ********************************************************************
>
> Forestweb News Rules!
>
> Ola Jane Gow
> Forestweb
> 35 Stillman Street, Suite 206
> San Francisco, CA 94107-1365
>
> 415-759-1299 (phone/fax)
> 415-533-3802 (mobile phone)
> 435-508-3412 (mobile fax)


FYI.
---------------------- Forwarded by Pinnamaneni Krishnarao/HOU/ECT on
08/03/2000 08:16 AM ---------------------------

David Foti@EES
08/02/2000 05:06 PM
To: Pinnamaneni Krishnarao/HOU/ECT@ECT, Minal Dalia/HOU/EES@EES, Sanjay
Agarwal/HOU/EES@EES, Naveen Andrews/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Meeting Confirmation / Discussion Points

Tariff VAR Project Kick-off Meeting

Time: 8/3; 2-3 pm
Location: EB612

==============================================================================
=============
Per the 8/2 lunch meeting between Research, RAC, and the Tariff Group, there
developed a consensus to:

Develop a high level Value-at-Risk model within a 4-8 week time frame to use
for initial risk measurement and hedging purposes
Accommodate links for critical variables such as Interest Rates, Load Growth,
and inflation
Provide "knobs" for less quantifiable factors such as rate case frequency,
rate methodology, etc.
Collaborate with the tariff forecasting team, to have consistent assumptions
and logic.

Proposed agenda for our meeting:

Discuss the relationship of this project to other ongoing projects
Review existing T&D forecast model (decide whether it's a starting point or
not - attached for your review)
Discuss approach (methodology and technology)
Assign responsibilities
Develop project guidelines and timeline

See worksheets, "Diagram", "Graph", "Exposure"


Cindy called this morning to let you know that Stan plans to go to Omaha January 9 for an all employee meeting for Northern Natural and Northern Borders.  You are welcome to travel on the plan with him.  Please advise Cindy next week what your plans are.


The primary contact for Williams will be: Alex Goldberg.? E-mail:
alex.goldberg@williams.com
Ph. # 918.573.3901
Fax # 918.573.6928
Address: One Williams Center
????????????? MD 41-3
????????????? Tulsa, OK 74172

There will be other topic specific contacts for Williams.? I will get you
their info. tomorrow.


Mark/Tana,

Due to the recent organizational changes with Sheri Thomas & Amita Gosalia
(see memo below), we will need to remove them as "agents and
attorneys-in-fact to execute Password Applications on behalf of EOL" and add
Savita Puthigai, Lara McKinney and myself.

Also, Dale Neuner should be removed as he is no longer part of EnronOnline
operations but is responsible for DealBench and CommodityLogic operations.
Savita suggested we also add Torrey Moorer since I will be out on maternity
leave in mid July and he will be backing me up during that time.

Can you let me know the turnaround time of a change like this?
Also, is it separate documentation for North America and Europe?

Thank you for your help.
Jennifer
3-5824

To better leverage intellectual capital across Enron Net Works, we have
several organizational announcements to share with you:

Sally Beck, Tom Gros and Beth Perlman will work together to direct our
efforts to &commercialize8 our mid and back office services.  They will
report to the ENW Office of the Chair.  Sally will continue to lead the
day-to-day operations of our mid & back office.  In addition to leading the
development and marketing of Commodity Logic, Tom will have primary
responsibility for the marketing of our mid & back office services.  Beth
will continue to lead IT development for the Americas, including Commodity
Logic and all other systems necessary to deliver mid & back office services.
Joining Tom,s marketing team are Sheri Thomas, Frank Davis, Andrea Crump,
Jeff Harbert and Fred Philipson.

The EnronOnline Product Control function, currently reporting to Sheri
Thomas, will fold into EnronOnline Operations.  Savita Puthigai will lead the
combined group, which will have responsibility for all non-IT day-to-day
operations.  Sheri will move to the mid & back office commercialization
effort reporting to Tom Gros.  Jennifer Denny will assume Sheri,s
responsibilities as the lead for product control.

Amita Gosalia, director of EnronOnline Europe Support, has accepted a new
position with EBS in London.  With her departure, Lara Fields will assume
responsibility for the EnronOnline support team in Europe and report to
Savita.  Paul Goddard will continue to lead our marketing efforts in Europe
and report directly to Andy Zipper, who will continue to lead all of
EnronOnline,s activities.  Angela Connelly will continue to manage
EnronOnline,s content in Europe and report to Kal Shah.  Additionally, John
Pavetto, John Cummings, John Allario, Mike Haney and Jake Staffel will join
Andy,s team to focus on origination opportunities around the EnronOnline
application.

Rex Shelby and David Berberian will focus on special initiatives and new
business opportunities.  Brandon Wax will manage ENW,s investment portfolio.
Mark S. Palmer will lead the Transaction Development and Structuring team.
In their new roles, Rex, Brandon and Mark will report to the ENW Office of
the Chair.

Please join us in congratulating everyone on their new responsibilities and
thank you for your continued support as we position ENW for the future.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Puthigai, Savita
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 8:02 AM
To: Denny, Jennifer
Subject: RE: FYI - this is something you may want to get your arms around

Will do.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Denny, Jennifer
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 5:49 PM
To: Puthigai, Savita
Cc: Lees, Lisa
Subject: FW: FYI - this is something you may want to get your arms around
Importance: High

Savita,
I think Lara, myself & you need to be added to this and others removed.
This is for PAs which are in Lisa's group.
Do you want to speak with Sheri & Legal (Mark Taylor, Tana Jones)?

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Neuner, Dale
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 5:21 PM
To: Denny, Jennifer
Subject: FYI - this is something you may want to get your arms around
Importance: High

The Unanimous Written Consent of Managers of EnronOnline, LLC dated 11-06-00,
effective as of 10-11-00, appoints Amita Gosalia, Dale Neuner and Sheri
Thomas as agents and attorneys-in-fact to execute Password Applications on
behalf of EOL.  This resolution will expire one year from the date of its
effectiveness.  When executing, these signatories must sign as &Agent and
Attorney-in-fact8.

Dale Neuner, Manager
Product Control Groups
CommodityLogic; DealBench


Don't forget to cancel that PAC for me?

Talk to you later.

Chris


Christi

Here is a brief summary of the TVA/EPMI lawsuit - Let me know if you would
like more information

(Note - the MOPA has been filed under seal in order to protect
confidentiality  - The judge was sensitive about this given the potential
right of a party to get the MOPA from TVA under a FOIA - Accordingly, we
don't want to encourage further invetigation of the MOPA by third parties)

*EPMI filed a declaratory judgement proceeding on November 15, 1999 against
TVA in the District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee.  Judge Edgar
has been assigned the matter.

*The lawsuit concerns the interpretation of an option contract EPMI and TVA
entered into on December 6, 1995 (Master Option Purchase Agreement (MOPA).

*The sole issue presented by the declaratory judgement is the obligations of
TVA and EPMI under the MOPA in the circumstances where EPMI is unable to
schedule for delivery, or deliver, energy requested by TVA under the MOPA at
the Scheduled Delivery Point (SDP) if the available transfer capability at
the SDP is not sufficient to allow the schedule or delivery.  EPMI believes
that the MOPA unambiguously addresses the issue.

*A trial date in late June 2000 has been set.

*EPMI filed a Motion for Summary Judgement on November 18, 1999.


---------------------- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 04/25/2000
04:43 PM ---------------------------

"Bill Gage" <gage@bkollp.com> on 04/24/2000 06:30:53 PM
To: "Richard Sanders" <richard.b.sanders@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Wasssssupppp

Sanders - Forgot to send you this earlier.?  Takes a while to download, but
it is worth the wait. -  Gage
 - waasszzu.mpeg


---------------------- Forwarded by Vanessa Groscrand/Corp/Enron on
09/11/2000 02:55 PM ---------------------------
From: Russell Mitchell on 09/11/2000 11:31 AM
To: Vanessa Groscrand/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Slides

 - Enron on Calif. crisis 9-7-00.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/26/2001
04:37 PM ---------------------------

"Wydawnictwa Naukowo-Techniczne" <marketing@wnt.com.pl> on 01/25/2001
08:13:25 AM
To: <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: dot. odpowiedzi na list

Mam nadzieje, ze moja odowiedz na list Sz.Pana  z dn.19.01.01 doszla do Pana.
Byl on wysylany z niepewnego  komputera.
Jezeli nie doszedl, to prosze dac znac  (elektronicznie oczywiscie).
Serdecznie pozdrawiam
Grazyna Piesniewska


Jeff, I will arrive late evening tonight. I have a car and will talk to you enroute to Sacremento.  I am staying and meeting with SMUD at 11:30 - 1:00 and then probably meeting with PG&E on tues at 3:30.  I will either leave for Houston tues night or weds a.m. pending any possible meeting with SocalEd in L.A.  If we cannot meet with them this week, then I may reconsider that trip for next week.

Thanks, BT

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 12:13 PM
To:	Tycholiz, Barry
Subject:

Just sent you yahoo map/directions on how to get to DWR.


I believe we should back Massey as well.  Who do we weigh in with now?

Joe Hartsoe@ENRON
08/15/2000 08:27 AM
To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Bill Massey

Steve/Rick/Jim  ---  Talked to John Anderson yesterday.  He had just gotten
off the phone with Massey.  Massey believes Linda B.  is spending time at the
White House lobbying to be Chair.   Have we decided whether to back either
and if so which?  I would prefer backing Massey.  Thoughts?   JOE
202.466.9150
---------------------- Forwarded by Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron on 08/15/2000
09:13 AM ---------------------------

janderson <janderson@elcon.org> on 08/14/2000 03:05:28 PM
To: jhartso@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Bill Massey

Joe,

As you are probably aware, Jim Hoecker is considering leaving FERC
relatively soon.  The President will then name a new Chairman.  Bill Massey
is quite interested in receiving the nomination.

Please call to discuss.

John


> Parties To The PG&E Gas OII Settlement:
>
This is a reminder that we will host a half-day workshop tomorrow to discuss
unresolved issues concerning the tariffs to implement the PG&E Gas OII
Settlement.  The  meeting will be on Thursday, July 6, at 1:30 p.m., in Room
301b, 77 Beale Street, San Francisco.

We encourage you to provide us with any further comments on the tariff
drafts we have previously distributed by no later than the end of the day
today.

> Thanks again for helping us finalize these tariffs for our July 17
> compliance filing.
>
>
> Ron Stoner     Randy Litteneker
> (415) 973-3606    (415) 973-2179


FYI.  Also, I'll look at the agreement.  Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 06/07/2000 08:58 AM -----

	Stewart Rosman
	06/06/2000 05:26 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Merced Question

Sara -
Does Merced need to do anything to enter into financial weather transactions
(remember that they have a ISDA and have done numerous power swaps for the
past year)?

Thanks

Stewart


Hi all,

I am on the move again.  In case anyone has travel plans to the NE or TX,
I'll will be in either NJ or DC from the 4th-24th of March and in Corpus
Christi from the 24th of March through early May.  I'll settle in at Pax
River (SE MD) sometime in late May.  This email account should remain active
throughout or you can reach me at conway77@hotmail.com or on my cell at
850.939.8989.

Hope all is well,

Frank


Becky:  can you please make an addition:  After the the termination value brackets, put a period and add:  "A valuation sheet is attahced."  Thanks.  Sara

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Spencer, Becky
Sent:	Thursday, December 13, 2001 4:37 PM
To:	Aronowitz, Alan; Shackleton, Sara
Cc:	Hendry, Brent
Subject:	Form:  Termination Agreement Signoff Sheet

Attached you will find the above referenced form.

 << File: Termination Agreement Signoff Sheet.doc >>

Becky Spencer
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street - ECN 3851A
Houston TX  77002
713 853 7599 office
713 646 4842 fax


FYI - I will meet with James on Friday when he is back from London to go over
the change in reporting for him.  I gave his review the end of last week, but
didn't get to review the reporting change.  I will ask Patti to let you know
when I am meeting with James on Friday.  Wanted you to be in the loop on this
- particularly when we are getting in front of commercial guys, I want this
to be well done.  The training may be great - I just wanted to make sure that
James knew about Avril's trip and that he was aware of the content and
delivery on the training.  Looks like he still has some homework to do.
--Sally
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 02/06/2001 10:24 AM
---------------------------

James Scribner@ENRON
02/06/2001 03:21 AM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: EnTelligence Training

Not yet.  I will follow up with Avril.

	From:  Sally Beck @ ECT                           02/05/2001 03:08 PM

To: James Scribner/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: EnTelligence Training

Have you seen the training tools that Avril uses for such things?  --Sally
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 02/05/2001 03:07 PM
---------------------------

	Peggy Hedstrom
	02/05/2001 12:01 PM

To: Shawn Anderson/CAL/ECT@ECT, Jason Biever/CAL/ECT@ECT, Marlene
Cameron/CAL/ECT@ECT, Duncan Croasdale/CAL/ECT@ECT, Derek Davies/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Cyntia DiStefano/CAL/ECT@ECT, Lon Draper/CAL/ECT@ECT, Dean
Drozdiak/CAL/ECT@ECT, Jason Garvey/CAL/ECT@ECT, Bill Greenizan/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Jai Hawker/CAL/ECT@ECT, Frank Hoogendoorn/CAL/ECT@ECT, Kate
Joslyn/CAL/ECT@ECT, Kyle Kitagawa/CAL/ECT@ECT, Nicole LaPorte/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Eric LeDain/CAL/ECT@ECT, Derek Lynn/CAL/ECT@ECT, Jonathan McKay/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Grant Oh/CAL/ECT@ECT, Lori Poffenroth/CAL/ECT@ECT, David Pope/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Cooper Richey/CAL/ECT@ECT, Michael Savidant/CAL/ECT@ECT, Howard
Sangwine/CAL/ECT@ECT, Andre Templeman/CAL/ECT@ECT, Ryan Watt/CAL/ECT@ECT,
John Zufferli/CAL/ECT@ECT, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT, Matilda
Machado/CAL/ECT@ECT, Diana Andel/CAL/ECT@ECT, Melinda Whalen/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Brian Gillis/CAL/ECT@ECT, Kathy Reeves/CAL/ECT@ECT, Brian
Kristjansen/CAL/ECT@ECT, Jeff Sears/CAL/ECT@ECT, John D
Postlethwaite/CAL/ECT@ECT, Carlos Torres/CAL/ECT@ECT, Richard C
McKeel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Heal/CAL/ECT@ECT, Mark Dupuy/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc: Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EnTelligence Training

Please mark your calendars for EnTelligence Training on February 22nd.
EnTelligence is a system developed by Enron that provides a prospecting and
management reporting website combining information from internal and external
systems.  New enhancements to the system now provide Activity Detail reports
by counterparty.  It also contains Family Tree information for companies
(i.e. subsidiaries, division of... etc.).  Avril Forster from the Houston
office will be providing the training.

We will divide the training into three sessions on February 22nd  as follows:

10:00 - 12:00 Origination team training
1:30 - 2:30 Energy Operations team training
3:00 - 5:00 Trading team training

All training will be in the Video #2 boardroom (next to Liz Prior).  Please
make every effort to attend this training.  Hopefully, you will find the
EnTelligence system a useful tool for each of you.  If you have any questions
or concerns, please let me know.


Congratulations on your added role of Chairman and CEO of ENA.  I didn't
realize that when I said hello in the elevator last week that we would be
seeing more of you in Houston.  I look forward to working with you when you
arrive.


This is important stuff.  Pop quiz material.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/30/2001 10:47
AM ---------------------------

	From:  David Leboe @ ECT                           10/17/2000 04:22 PM

To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Larsen/PDX/ECT@ECT, Karen E
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Carter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barton Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale
Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ed B Hearn III/HOU/ECT@ECT, matt.maxwell@enron.com,
kay.mann@enron.com, Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy Banczak/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Herman Manis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Roger Ondreko/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Power Plant Development Powerpoint Presentation

Herman and I will see you at 10:00am tomorrow to discuss accounting issues
related to our power plant development and sale activities.

Our presentation will be based upon the following attachment.

Hard copies will be available tomorrow in 38C2.

Regards.

Alan Larsen
10/16/2000 01:13 PM
To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Karen E Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Carter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barton
Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ed B Hearn III/HOU/ECT@ECT,
matt.maxwell@enron.com, kay.mann@enron.com, Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy
Banczak/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Leboe/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Power Plant Development Powerpoint Presentation

Could you check with David and see if he could fax copies of the PowerPoint
plates to me in Portland so we have a fighting chance of following along by
tying in by phone?    If that is possible, try to send them by Tuesday. Thank
you very much.
 Al Larsen

From: Suzanne Adams on 10/12/2000 04:11 PM
To: Karen E Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Carter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barton
Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Larsen/PDX/ECT@ECT, Dale Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ed B
Hearn III/HOU/ECT@ECT, matt.maxwell@enron.com, kay.mann@enron.com, Stuart
Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy Banczak/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: David Leboe/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Power Plant Development Powerpoint Presentation

There will be a presentation by David Leboe on October 18, 2000 at 10:00 a.m.
in EB38C2.  Please put this on your calendar and plan to attend.

Also, the weekly meetings with Sheila will begin October 25, 2000 at 10:00
a.m. in E38C2.


I will look at it too and provide comments tomorrow.  I forwarded it to Ann
Elizabeth and Carlos.  I don't know which ENA attorney is on this project, so
Kay, you may want to touch base with them.  Thanks.

Ben F Jacoby
05/21/2001 04:53 PM
Sent by: Ben Jacoby
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Greg Krause/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Midway Project - Generic Interconnect Agreement

Kay / Christi:

We need to get a law firm reviewing this agreement as soon as possible. As
Christi has worked with several on past projects, I thought she could help.
Please let me know how we should proceed.

Thanks,

Ben
---------------------- Forwarded by Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT on 05/21/2001 02:57 PM
---------------------------

Greg Krause@ENRON
05/21/2001 04:00 PM
To: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Midway Project - Generic Interconnect Agreement

Please see attached for your review and comments.


Start Date: 4/24/01; HourAhead hour: 23;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042423.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 23 / Preferred:   0.00 / Final:   0.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EES
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/24/01
  UNIT_ID: BADLND_7_PL1X2

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 23 / Preferred: -525.00 / Final: -522.24)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/24/01
  TRADING_SC: NES1
  PNT_OF_INTRC: SP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 1
  DEAL_NO: 1

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 23 / Preferred:   5.37 / Final:   4.63)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE2
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/24/01
  SC_ID: EPMI
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 23 / Preferred:  48.96 / Final:  46.36)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE3
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/24/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


Mark,
Terrie mails the download CD's weekly and the Curtail.DB file is downloaded
three days a week as part of the SCADA backup.  The four most recent
downloads are on the way there today.  If neccessary, I can email the curtail
files but it would be very time consuming.  Let me know if you need me to do
this.

Matt
---------------------- Forwarded by Matt Allsup/EWC/Enron on 06/03/2002 01:50
PM ---------------------------

Mark Fisher
06/03/2002 11:25 AM
To: Matt Allsup/EWC/Enron@Enron
cc: Kurt Anderson/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Hollis Kimbrough/EWC/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Desert Sky May Log

Matt,

Have you made arrangements to send us that file? I haven't seen that file
yet, so don't know how that is going to affect the curtailment computations.

Mark

Matt Allsup
06/03/2002 11:11 AM
To: Mark Fisher/EWC/Enron@Enron
cc: Kurt Anderson/EWC/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Desert Sky May Log

Mark,
I meant to tell you that the new curtailment software is in place so
curtailments are recorded in Visupro after the 25'th.  The file is called
Curtail.DB  We have no way of verifying the accuracy of the files but they
seem to be right on.

Matt
---------------------- Forwarded by Matt Allsup/EWC/Enron on 06/03/2002 01:11
PM ---------------------------

Mark Fisher
06/03/2002 07:25 AM
To: Matt Allsup/EWC/Enron@Enron
cc: Kurt Anderson/EWC/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Desert Sky May Log

Matt,

The curtailment log implies that you had no curtailment for the last week of
May (after May 25th). Is that true?

Mark

Matt Allsup
06/03/2002 07:04 AM
To: Kurt Anderson/EWC/Enron@ENRON
cc: Danielle Lewis/EWC/Enron@Enron, Mark V Walker/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Mark
Fisher/EWC/Enron@Enron, George Griese/EWC/Enron@Enron, Bo
Thisted/EWC/Enron@Enron

Subject: Desert Sky May Log


Nora,

I have a call into my business person.  I ran what's going on by Mark Taylor
(you know, I'm just a paralegal, Mark's a lawyer), and got his permission to
exclude the arbitration language from the agreement.  So I just wanted to run
it by Dave, and then we're home free.  Also, I don't know who you had lined
up to sign, but Louise Kitchen has strict rules that I have to have someone
from her group execute all their documents.  Who would you get to sign?

	Nora Dobin@ENRON
	01/12/2001 03:35 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Jeff Bartlett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roseann
Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@enron
		 Subject: Re: Net Works/Bridge NDA

Update.  Bridge has signed and faxed back to us the attached NDA.  We have
not provided a signed counterpart and will not until we hear back from you.
If the attached is not acceptable to Net Works, we can ask Bridge to sign the
NDA again with DealBench as the Enron counterparty and you can have Bridge
sign the appropriate NDA for Net Works.

I apologize for any inconvenience; we merely were trying to accommodate
everyone's goals in a short time frame.

Regards, NJD

Nora J. Dobin
Senior Counsel
Enron Global Finance
Enron Corp.
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas  77002

713/345-7723 (phone)
713/853-9252 (fax)
E-mail:  nora.dobin@enron.com

	Nora Dobin
	01/12/01 02:27 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Jeff Bartlett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roseann
Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@enron
		 Subject: Re: Net Works/Bridge NDA

A couple of additional thoughts.  The mutual NDA covers Net Works and its
wholly-owned subsidiaries (which includes EOL).  Equitable relief is more
likely than arbitration to be the relief sought for breach of an NDA and
equitable relief is covered by attached.  We appreciate the need to conform
to policy; these thoughts are shared merely in an attempt to help streamline
the process for this transaction.  Again, just let us know how you would like
to proceed.  Regards, NJD

Nora J. Dobin
Senior Counsel
Enron Global Finance
Enron Corp.
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas  77002

713/345-7723 (phone)
713/853-9252 (fax)
E-mail:  nora.dobin@enron.com

	Nora Dobin
	01/12/01 02:02 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Bartlett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roseann
Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Re: Net Works/Bridge NDA

We have done as outlined in my e-mail; if this is not acceptable, we can ask
Bridge to sign another agreement.  Bridge does want a mutual NDA and we need
something this afternoon.  Please let us know.

Nora J. Dobin
Senior Counsel
Enron Global Finance
Enron Corp.
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas  77002

713/345-7723 (phone)
713/853-9252 (fax)
E-mail:  nora.dobin@enron.com

	Tana Jones@ECT
	01/12/01 01:52 PM

		 To: Nora Dobin/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Dave Samuels/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Net Works/Bridge NDA

Are you drafting this NDA for us?  I have already prepared a draft based off
your form, which adds not only Enron Net Works, but also EnronOnline as our
counterparty.  In addition, we have a company policy that requires that we
have arbitration in all of our agreement.  Our client over at EnronOnline,
Dave Samuels, is sending our form to his customer.

	Nora Dobin@ENRON
	01/12/2001 01:42 PM

		 To: Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Jeff Bartlett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Net Works/Bridge NDA

Further to attached, Shmuel advises that Bridge's signed counterpart of
attached is being faxed back to us this afternoon.  In my physical absence, I
have asked Rose to initial for Net Works (Mark, hope this is ok; this is same
agreement used for DealBench with changes noted below).  Bridge did not
return signed its counterpart of DealBench agreement, asking this morning for
a mutual NDA which we have accommodated.  Jeff suggested that since we had to
revise the agreement, we streamline the Net Works effort by making it the
Enron counterparty (Net Works and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (including
DealBench) are covered by NDA).

Thanks for your help.

Regards, NJD

Nora J. Dobin
Senior Counsel
Enron Global Finance
Enron Corp.
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas  77002

713/345-7723 (phone)
713/853-9252 (fax)
E-mail:  nora.dobin@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Nora Dobin/Corp/Enron on 01/12/01 01:25 PM -----

	Nora Dobin
	01/12/01 01:15 PM

		 To: shmuel.bulka@bridge.com
		 cc: Jeff Bartlett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Net Works/Bridge NDA

Attached please find another draft of confidentiality agreement revised to
(i) change the DealBench counterparty to its parent, Enron Net Works LLC, and
(ii) make the agreement mutual in respect of Bridge Confidential
Information.  I understand that DealBench (which continues to be protected
under this agreement) would like to disclose information this afternoon to
Bridge.  Accordingly, please fax a signed Bridge counterpart as soon as
possible to me at the fax number below and to Jeff Bartlett at 713/646-8576.
We will fax to you a counterpart signed by Net Works.

Regards, NJD

Nora J. Dobin
Senior Counsel
Enron Global Finance
Enron Corp.
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas  77002

713/345-7723 (phone)
713/853-9252 (fax)
E-mail:  nora.dobin@enron.com


Baltimore Gas & Electric
Brian Russo (finance area)  410-783-3623

Someone in settlements needs to contact him to determine Default Rate since BG&E wants to pay full amount (sounds like all deals have terminated)

Sara Shackleton
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3801a
Houston, TX  77002
Ph:  (713) 853-5620
Fax: (713) 646-3490


Please see the attached memo and blackline.


amerex
Mike Swerzbin
deal 569270
Amerex show cp as Merrill Lynch and we show Morgan Stanley

   Kate Symes @ ECT                04/03/2001 04:31 PM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: 4/3 Checkout

BLOOMBERG
569021 - changed to Bloomberg

PREBON
Tom Alonso
checked with broker - Tom Alonso did not do this deal - Jeff Richter did a
similar one but it is with Williams, not Reliant......???

Jeff Richter
closest deal I can see is 569178 - all same terms except it's at NP not SP

AMEREX
Mike Swerzbin
569315 - added Amerex as broker

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
04/03/2001 02:20 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 4/3 Checkout

BLOOMBERG

deal 569021
I think the broker should be Bloomberg instead of APB

PREBON  WEST

Tom Alonso
I am missing the following deal
Enron sells to Reliant 25mw 4/5-4/30 SP-15 at $263

Jeff Richter
I am missing:
Enron sells to WESCO 25 mw 4/5-4/30 SP-15 at $286

AMEREX WEST

Mike Swerzbin
I am missing:
Enron sells EES 50mw May-Dec NP-15 light at $200.


Executive Summary
?	Edison's MOU Condemned at this Friday's CPUC Meeting
?	The Idle Plan Z
?	Angelides Hides State Budget Concerns
?	House Committee to Vote on Energy Relief

Edison's MOU Doubtful
The unusually calm settling over the California legislature about SoCal Edison's potential bankruptcy has finally affected the relentlessly optimistic investment bank analysts and other company shareholders.  We have reported that through all plans from B-Z, there is not a solid plan to save this company and now executives are even more fearful that this predictions may come to fruition.

Over the last few days, Edison executives have begun pointing hard at the CPUC meeting this Friday as a make-or-break event for the company.  The is because after the meeting, Davis's MOU plan to buy SoCal's grid will have no chance of preventing a potential bankruptcy.  This plan is essentially dead although Governor Daivs has yet to say this in a press releases.  The final nail will happen after the CPUC adjourns its Friday meeting without voting on several necessary MOU provisions.  Unless the CPUC makes a last minute, emergency - amendment to their agenda,  the deal will be dead (despite SoCal's support for letting the deal stand past its deadline).  Sources indicate that CPUC President Loretta Lynch holds reservations on the MOU and continues to distance herself from Davis.

Attempting to influence policy making, Edison executives have spent the last few investor phone conferences warning that June 8 would see substantially increased risks for a creditor-induced bankruptcy if the Davis plan dies at CPUC.  This is interesting, since no one else seems to have been focused on the date until Edison began mentioning it late last week.  However, there is no more or less threat of bankruptcy than there is now or will be in two weeks.   As reported several times earlier, most everyone had given up on the MOU long before this Friday's CPUC meeting.

Plan Z Shows Little Progress
Meanwhile, the unhurried pace toward a Plan Z that we reported last Friday, has gained little progress.  Legislators continue to pin-point a plan that will secure re-election votes and at the same time, weigh the need for rate hikes for California's corporate and home electricity users.  As they hash it out, the state is spending even more on electricity purchases.  In spite of better than expected levels of conservation, the state's electricity expenditures over the last month rose to an average of $79M/day. The recent rate increases mean more spending by the state and that calls into question the reassuring Angelides scenario for California's budget prospects later this year.

The California Budget Crunch
Even more worrisome than a idle Plan Z is increasing evidence that last month's conference call with State Treasurer Angelides was a little misleading. During that conference call Angelides claimed that State Comptroller Connell and many in the financial committee had the numbers wrong.  Angelides argued that $7.2B already spent to buy power since January was really the total amount of authorized spending through late August.  In fact, he said only $4.3B of that had been "spent."  Sources now indicate that  Angelides was technically correct if you use "spent" to mean only the amount of money for which checks had been written.  This is different than the amount of money California had already promised to energy suppliers who had already supplied energy to the state.  In fact, when Angelides was speaking the state had in fact already promised to pay $7B for energy it had already consumed (the total committed has topped $8B.)  By the time the state gets its "power bonds" auctioned in August, they will have already spent all $12B and be back to dipping into the General Fund.   The idea of RANs being auctioned before the power bonds get issued is still an option if the general fund doesn't make it to August.

The nearest answer to both of these cash flow deficits lies in part in the painful process that the legislature is undertaking now - another round of huge electricity rate hikes to securitize debt issuance.  Then the hope is that those hikes bridge the gap between now and when new capacity brings wholesale rates down and the debts can be repaid.   The only near term path to bringing generating assets on line immediately is the 3,500 MW from QF plants which are off line because of cash flow problems.  Settling their needs is wrapped up in settling the PG&E and Edison trade creditor issues, which makes the legislature's leisurely approach to the rate hike/haircut situation all the more troublesome.

Energy Relief
The House Energy & Commerce Committee is scheduled to vote on H.R. 1647 (the Emergency Electricity Relief Act) tomorrow at 10:00 am.  The bill which was twice postponed and does not include any provisions on price caps, but during the course of the mark-up, sources indicate that it is possible, even likely, that a Democrat could offer a price cap amendment.  Rep. Waxman (D-CA) offered a price cap amendment at an earlier mark-up of the bill at the subcommittee level.  The Waxman amendment was rejected along party lines (all Republicans and 2 Democrats voted nay).  Sources inside Joe Barton's office report that staff and members have been meeting to work out a compromise on the price cap issue, but nothing has been resolved. As of this afternoon, those discussions have been terminated in favor of an open discourse in the Committee tomorrow.  Since an agreement was not reached, compromise language is not expected to be offered as an amendment tomorrow.  If it is, it would not be something that leaders on the Republican and Democrat sides have crafted together and therefore would not likely pass.  Sources indicate that the committee does expect Waxman, and possibly others to offer price cap language, but it is not expected to pass.


Joe- Where is liquidity group meeting. My group wants to spend some time with them and then reconvene with us to discuss book position s. Rick 3-4739


Kelly,

At the behest of Tori Kuykendall,  I have prepared a draft of Enron North
America Corp.'s GISB for your review.  Please do not hesitate to contact me
with your questions and or comments regarding the attached.

Regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


---------------------- Forwarded by Jason R Wiesepape/HOU/ECT on 02/03/2000
10:31 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Michael B Rosen                           02/03/2000 10:16 AM

To: Jason R Wiesepape/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: 2000 Analyst cont'd


Gentlemen:

Sara Shackleton of Enron North America Corp. has asked me to follow-up on an
engagement letter faxed to Mr. Slade on May 2.  Attachment "B" should be
completed and faxed back to Sara at 713/646-3393.  If you did not receive the
faxed engagement letter, please let me know by return email and I will fax it
to you again.

Regards,
Kaye Ellis
Administrative Assistant


Please let me know if there are any problems.  There are only  a few more
html's to document and I will send those soon.  Just wanted to get you what I
have finished.

Adriane

Market Info.  K-U

http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=RiskMgmtGlossary/eprmglosk.htm

http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=RiskMgmtGlossary/eprmglosl.htm

http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=RiskMgmtGlossary/eprmglosm.htm

http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=RiskMgmtGlossary/eprmglosn.htm

http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=RiskMgmtGlossary/eprmgloso.htm

http://www.enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=RiskMgmtGlossary/eprmglosp.htm

http://www.enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=RiskMgmtGlossary/eprmglosq.htm

http://www.enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=RiskMgmtGlossary/eprmglosr.htm

http://www.enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=RiskMgmtGlossary/eprmgloss.htm

http://www.enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=RiskMgmtGlossary/eprmglost.htm

http://www.enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=RiskMgmtGlossary/eprmglosu.htm

Listing of Exchange-Traded Energy

http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=RiskMgmtGlossary/eprmglosexch.ht
m

About EnronOnline

http://www.Enrononline.com/home?ID=About

FAQ,s

http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=FAQ/default.htm

Technical Questions
http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=FAQ/default.htm#technical_questi
ons1

http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=FAQ/default.htm#technical_questi
ons2

http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=FAQ/default.htm#technical_questi
ons3

http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=FAQ/default.htm#technical_questi
ons4

http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=FAQ/default.htm#technical_questi
ons5

http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=FAQ/default.htm#technical_questi
ons6

http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=FAQ/default.htm#technical_questi
ons7

http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=FAQ/default.htm#technical_questi
ons8

Transacting via EnronOnline
http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=FAQ/default.htm#transacting1

http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=FAQ/default.htm#transacting2

http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=FAQ/default.htm#transacting3

http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=FAQ/default.htm#transacting4

http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=FAQ/default.htm#transacting5

http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=FAQ/default.htm#transacting6

http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=FAQ/default.htm#transacting7

http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=FAQ/default.htm#transacting8

http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=FAQ/default.htm#transacting9

http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=FAQ/default.htm#transacting10

http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=FAQ/default.htm#transacting11

http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=FAQ/default.htm#transacting12

http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=FAQ/default.htm#transacting13

Products & Prices
http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=FAQ/default.htm#products_prices1

http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=FAQ/default.htm#products_prices2

http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=FAQ/default.htm#products_prices3

http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=FAQ/default.htm#products_prices4

http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=FAQ/default.htm#products_prices5

http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=FAQ/default.htm#products_prices6

http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=FAQ/default.htm#products_prices7

http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=FAQ/default.htm#products_prices8

Registration and User Admin.
http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=FAQ/default.htm#registration_use
r_administration1

http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=FAQ/default.htm#registration_use
r_administration2

http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=FAQ/default.htm#registration_use
r_administration3

http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=FAQ/default.htm#registration_use
r_administration4

http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=FAQ/default.htm#registration_use
r_administration5

http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=FAQ/default.htm#registration_use
r_administration6

http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=FAQ/default.htm#registration_use
r_administration7

http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=FAQ/default.htm#registration_use
r_administration8

http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=FAQ/default.htm#registration_use
r_administration9

http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=FAQ/default.htm#registration_use
r_administration10

http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=FAQ/default.htm#registration_use
r_administration11

http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=FAQ/default.htm#registration_use
r_administration12

http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=FAQ/default.htm#registration_use
r_administration13

http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=FAQ/default.htm#registration_use
r_administration14

http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=FAQ/default.htm#registration_use
r_administration15

http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=FAQ/default.htm#registration_use
r_administration16

Legal Contracts
http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=FAQ/default.htm#legal_contracts1

http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=FAQ/default.htm#legal_contracts2

http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=FAQ/default.htm#legal_contracts3

http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=FAQ/default.htm#legal_contracts4

Press Room
http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=PressRelease/default.htm
http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=PressRelease/19991026.htm

http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=PressRelease/19991202.htm

http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=PressRelease/pr20000223.htm

http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=PressRelease/pr20000323.htm

http://www.Enrononline.com/marketinfo/home_ID=PressRelease/pr20000601.htm


Jeannie,

No problem. please, call Shirley (3-5290) to set up a meeting.

Vince

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mandelker, Jeannie
Sent:	Friday, June 01, 2001 8:49 AM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J
Subject:	a chance to speak

Vince, you may remember me as the writer who helped on the natural gas chapter for the Risk Management book. As you know, I work for Enron full-time as a writer of many articles and publications.

I will be in Houston next week and I wondered if you had a half hour on Tuesday afternoon or Wednesday to talk about market trends. I'm also available until 11 a.m. on Thursday.

Thanks,
Jeannie


__________________

To:   Steve Howard
 Richard Sanders
 Kathy Patrick

 This message will confirm the conference call scheduled for Wednesday, April
18, 2001 at 9:30 a.m. CDT.  Steve Howard will initiate the call to Kathy who
can add Richard.  If you have any questions or need to reschedule, please
e-mail Steve Howard at showard@agsk.com.  Thank you.

     ................................................

ALSCHULER GROSSMAN STEIN & KAHAN LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
www.agsk.com

2049 Century Park East
Thirty-Ninth Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067-3213
Tel 310-277-1226
Fax 310-552-6077

This transmission is intended only for the use
of the addressee and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential and exempt from
disclosure under applicable law. If you are not
the intended recipient, or the employee or agent
responsible for delivering the message to the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any dissemination, distribution or copying of
this communication is strictly prohibited.

If you have received this communication
in error, please notify us immediately
via e-mail at postmaster@agsk.com or
by telephone at 310-277-1226. Thank you.

...............................................


This is the deal we made for El Paso last Friday to replace deal 235670,
which had Teco.  Julie Meyers needs a price to be added to the deal.  Which
price should I add?


In my sniffling, sneezing, coughing, stuffy head, fever state I did not
realize that Aaron only sent the Germany info to me.  So here it is...enjoy!

Kelly, I'll drop off my FTs on the way to the final since I won't be able to
attend your party after.  You will need to take them out of the rubberband
before you recycle them!

See you guys tomorrow...Good Luck!

-----Original Message-----
From: Jacqueline Kelly
To: Jacqueline Kelly; 'Aaron Mednelson (E-mail) '; 'Aiaz Kazi (E-mail) ';
'Charlotte Kwon (E-mail) '; 'Chris_Neale (E-mail) '; 'Chrystine Lee (E-mail)
'; 'Deepika Shah (E-mail) '; 'Jeff Dasovich (E-mail) '; 'Jonathan Hudacko
(E-mail) '; 'Kelly Davis (E-mail) '; 'Kimberely Kupiecki (E-mail) '; 'Marty
Esarte (E-mail) '; 'Michael Smith (E-mail) '; 'Paul Brodie (E-mail) ';
'Peter Devroede (E-mail) '
Cc: ''langridg@haas.berkeley.edu ' '
Sent: 12/10/99 2:36 PM
Subject: RE: sf study group update

From Jeff...
 <<indonesia matrix.doc>>

 - Germany.doc


The report named: NG - PROPT P/L <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=11&report_name=NG+-+PROPT+P/L&category_cd=5&category_name=FINANCIAL&toc_hide=1&sTV1=5&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=11/19/2001>, published as of 11/19/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


Has Louise mentioned anything about this to you?  What are we supposed to do
with it?
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT on
06/11/99 01:13 PM ---------------------------

Louise Kitchen
06/09/99 06:53 AM
To: Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FYI

http://www.otp.org/


_________________________________________________________________

            B R E A K F A S T   W I T H   T H E   F O O L
                     Wednesday, October 18, 2000

benjamin.rogers@enron.com
_________________________________________________________________

REGISTER TO BECOME A FOOL -- GET FREE STUFF!
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=159574
_________________________________________________________________

 Sponsored By: Scottrade
 Fools, Scottrade is the only broker with $7 trades, 120
 local offices & FREE REALTIME STREAMING quotes & charts!
 Apply now!
 http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=159575

"We don't know a millionth of one percent about anything."
-- Thomas Edison

COPPER MOUNTAIN GETS HALVED
Copper Mountain, the provider of digital subscriber line
solutions, reported its Q3 earnings yesterday, along with some
bad news about its Q4.

By LouAnn Lofton

Digital subscriber line (DSL) solutions provider Copper Mountain
Networks (Nasdaq: CMTN) announced its third-quarter results
yesterday after the bell. The company also provided some
guidance for its fourth quarter and for its next fiscal year
that sent its stock tumbling more than 50% to around $12 in
after-hours trading. Copper Mountain closed in regular trading
yesterday at $26.88, far below the 52-week high it reached back
in July of $125.72.

For its third quarter, Copper Mountain had revenues of $93.5
million, 192% ahead of the $32 million it earned in the same
quarter a year ago. Pro forma net income, which excludes two
charges, was $15.8 million. The company's net income last year
in the third quarter was $5.3 million.

Copper Mountain's pro forma earnings per diluted share came in a
penny ahead of the consensus estimate at $0.27. Third-quarter
earnings per share a year ago were $0.09.

Now, for the stuff that sent the company's stock plummeting in
after-hours trading. Rick Gilbert, Copper Mountain's president
and chief executive officer, said, "In light of recent
reductions in capital expenditure forecasts from many of our
CLEC [Competitive Local Exchange Carriers] customers, we expect
revenue and earnings to decline in the fourth quarter of 2000 on
a sequential basis."

Just how big will the "decline" be? Copper Mountain now expects
sales to be $60 million for the fourth quarter. It sees pro
forma earnings per share coming in between $0.04 and $0.06.
Analysts had been looking for $0.28 a share.

Gilbert went on to talk about his company's expected fiscal 2001
results. While pointing out that giving guidance that far out is
very difficult, he said he expects sales for fiscal 2001 to be
between $300 million and $330 million. Earnings per share should
be between $0.16 and $0.25. Street analysts were expecting $1.37
a share for Copper Mountain's fiscal 2001.

AFTER-HOURS COVERAGE

INTEL VS. ADVANCED MICRO
By Brian Lund
Intel's revenue warning in September turned out to be cosmetic.
Revenue growth was still strong, margins improved meaningfully,
and earnings came in at original expectations. Intel continues
to dominate its main competitor, AMD.
FULL STORY
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=159576
_________________________________________________________________

NEWS TO GO

RF Micro Devices (Nasdaq: RFMD), the wireless communications
amplifying chip maker, announced its second-quarter earnings
yesterday, and also talked about its expected third-quarter
results. For its Q2, the company met estimates with $0.10 a
share. Net income was $17.7 million on revenues of $102.2
million. Last year in the second quarter, RF Micro Devices
earned $12.5 million on revenues of $68.9 million, or $0.07. The
company then said it was lowering expectations for the third
quarter because of low demand for its products, as well as
product delays. It expects earnings per share to be between
$0.04 and $0.05 a share. Analysts were looking for $0.11 a
share.

International Business Machines (NYSE: IBM) reported its
third-quarter earnings after the market's close yesterday. Sales
grew by 3% to $21.8 billion. This wasn't enough to satisfy
analysts, who were looking for sales to come in at $22.4
billion. Net income for the quarter rose to $2 billion, from
$1.7 billion in the same quarter last year. Earnings per share
were $1.08, versus $0.90 a share last year. This EPS number met
the consensus estimate as reported by First Call/Thompson
Financial. IBM blamed at least some of the weak revenue growth
on an anemic euro. The company claimed its sales would have
risen 6% without those negative currency effects.

Chip maker Xilinx (Nasdaq: XLNX) announced its second-quarter
earnings yesterday after the bell. The company's revenues grew
83% to $437.4 million, from $238.8 million in its second quarter
last year. Net income was $114.1 million, compared to $59.2
million a year ago. Earnings per share beat the consensus
estimate by two cents, coming in at $0.32, versus $0.17 last
year.

Handspring (Nasdaq: HAND) reported its first-quarter results
yesterday afternoon. The company's loss was narrower than
expected. Excluding some deferred stock compensation costs,
Handspring lost $8 million, or $0.08 a share. Analysts polled by
First Call/Thompson Financial expected it to lose $0.12 a share.
Including those costs, the company lost $0.17 a share, or $16.4
million. Handspring's revenues for the quarter were $70.5
million.

Covad Communications Group (Nasdaq: COVD) announced its
third-quarter earnings results yesterday. Revenues were $66.7
million, compared to revenues in the year-ago period of $19.1
million. Covad's net loss was $189.9 million, versus a loss of
$54.1 million the year before. The company's net loss of $1.22
per share was greater than the consensus estimate of $1.18 per
share. In Covad's third quarter last year, it lost $0.47 a
share. Covad's chief executive officer, Robert Knowling, pointed
to his company's clients as the reason the shortfall. "Due to
the weakness in the capital markets, nine of our channel
partners have experienced financing difficulties and have
slipped in their ability to stay current with their accounts
receivable. To conservatively account for this, despite billing
$78.1 million in revenue for the third quarter, only $66.7
million was recorded."

Check out yesterday's Foolish market wrap-up in just one click.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=159577
_________________________________________________________________

EDITOR'S PICK

Paul Larson defines this mouthful -- disaggregation and
horizontalization -- and explains how they can increase a company's
competitiveness and shareholder value.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=159578
_______________________________________________________________

-News & Commentary
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=159579

-Fool Community
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=159580

-Post of the Day
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=159581

-Latest Fribble
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=159582

-Latest Market Numbers
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=159583
____________________________________________________________

My Portfolio: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=159584
My Discussion Boards: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=159585
My Fool: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=159586
Fool.com Home: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=159587
My E-Mail Settings: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=159588

 Sponsored By: Scottrade
 Fools, Scottrade is the only broker with $7 trades, 120
 local offices & FREE REALTIME STREAMING quotes & charts!
 Apply now!
 http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=159589

WIRELESS 201: FREE PREVIEW
 Get a sneak peek at this report on Soapbox.com
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=159590

BECOME A FOOL!
 Get a FREE Investing Guide and more...
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=159591

FOOL DIRECT E-MAIL SERVICES
 Need to change your address or unsubscribe? You
 can also temporarily suspend mail delivery. Click here:
http://www.fool.com/community/freemail/freemaillogin.asp?email=benjamin.rogers
@enron.com>

Have ideas about how we can improve the Fool Direct or new
e-mail products you'd like to see? Try our discussion board:
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=159592
____________________________________________________
(c) Copyright 2000, The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. This
material is for personal use only. Republication and
redissemination, including posting to news groups, is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of The Motley Fool.

.

MsgId: msg-2616-B10181309Address.msg-09:00:19(10-18-2000)
X-Version: mailer-sender-master,v 1.84
X-Version: mailer-sender-daemon,v 1.84
Message-Recipient: benjamin.rogers@enron.com


Attached is the draft witness list/summary.  Please read carefully for
content and get back to me any comments.  It is to be sent to the other side
Friday.

We have made a conscious decision to leave Wayne Perry and Mike McConnel off
the list.  If anyone disagrees, please get back to me immediately.

 <<Doc1.wpd>>

 - Doc1.wpd


We are one @enron.com!

Please be aware of the following senders were automatically notified to (a).
stop sending internet mail to your @ect.enron.com address and to (b). send
future internet communications to Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com :

Jim.Dyer@bus.utexas.edu, john@sava.com

REMINDER :
Your @ect.enron.com address should not be used any longer and will be
deactivated soon.  So please make sure these contacts switch to your new
@enron.com address.  If you have subscribed to mailing lists, please make
sure to update your addresses there as well.
AND
Your shortname@enron.com address (i.e. jsmith@enron.com) will continue to
work, even though your formal address is longname@enron.com (i.e.
john.smith@enron.com)

Please do not reply to this message as it was automatically generated.


I don't know if you got these.
---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 01/07/2000 08:52 AM
---------------------------

	From:  Yvette G Connevey @ ENRON                           01/07/2000 08:25 AM

To: Michael Walters/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, O'Neal D
Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Risk Team Weekly Meeting

Your Weekly Meeting with Brenda has been pushed back to 10:30 this morning
and will take place in Brenda's office.

Y


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 01/03/2001 08:06 AM -----

	EIS Billing
	01/02/2001 05:48 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: DECEMBER 2000 EIS BILLING STATEMENTS / s100061.xls

PLEASE E-MAIL BILLING ISSUES TO "CLIFFORD.JACKSON@ENRON.COM" OR AS SPECIFIED
BELOW:

Attached are spreadsheets with the detail supporting the expenses for all the
various services provided by Enron Information Services.

Phone charges:  Phones are being charged to the person's company and cost
center where possible; otherwise to the rent location.  If you are being
charged for phones/lines/services, etc. not belonging to you, or the room
number is incorrect on the phone or long distance billings, please contact
the Notes Mail ID "Move-Team" or move-team@enron.com and place a request for
the disconnection of that line, hardware, or service.

Data connections:  One connection is being charged for each room instead of
one connection for each port in a room.

EIS billings for items attached to the room, such as phones and data ports,
and people specific services for contractors, such as LAN ID's and AT&T
calling cards, are billed to the same company and cost center as room rent in
EB, 2AC, 3AC, or JF.  For Omaha, EIS uses a phone database maintained by
Tammy Anderson for this purpose.

People-specific services are billed to the company and cost center
corresponding to the employee's SAP company and department. Video conference
usage, data circuits, Ardmore usage, EDI, and web site billings are based on
a company and cost center furnished by the resource using the service.

EIS bills services on a one month lag.  We take a snapshot of the Corporate
Administrative Services rent file for each room in EB and 3AC, of the Omaha
phone database for each room in Omaha, and of the SAP company and cost center
for each employee.  This snapshot is taken about the 21st of each month for
use as a source for billing information.

If the billings are incorrect, generally speaking either the rent should be
corrected by contacting FMS/EPSC or the person should be moved to the correct
SAP company/cost center by contacting an HR representative.


The Lowest	 Life Insurance Quotes

Without the Hassle!
Compare rates from the nation's top Life Insurance companies
  COMPARE YOUR CURRENT COVERAGE
to these sample 10-year level term monthly premiums
(20 year, 30 year and smoker rates also available)
		$250,000		$500,000		$1,000,000
Age	Male	Female	Male	Female	Male	Female
30	$12	$11	$19	$15	$31	$27
40	$15	$13	$26	$21	$38	$37
50	$32	$24	$59	$43	$107	$78
60	$75	$46	$134	$87	$259	$161

Click Here to Compare!
It's fast, easy and FREE!

*All quotes shown are from insurance companies rated A-, A, A+ or A++ by A.M. Best Company (a registered rating service) and include all fees and commissions.
Actual premiums and coverage availability will vary depending upon age, sex, state availability, health history and recent tobacco usage.

If you wish to remove your email address from this mailing please reply to this email with the word  "remove" in the subject line


Chris,
We paid parking fees to Iroquois in two months:

May 1999 $1,934.42
June 1999 $1,872.02
Total  $3,806.44

Let me know if you need anything else.

Chris


---------------------- Forwarded by Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron on 05/25/2001
08:30 AM ---------------------------

Stanley Horton
05/25/2001 08:38 AM
To: MARY TURINA/ENRON@enronxgate
cc:

Subject: PGE Position Report

I would appriciate if you would send to me each week the PGE Position
Report.  Also, at your convenience I would like to spend some time via
telephone to run through the report to make sure I understand just what is
being reported.  I'll have my assistant call to set-up the phone call early
next week.

Also, to whom in Risk Management do you send the position report?

Thanks.


9.6  Additional Factory Testing
.  In the event that Purchaser reasonably determines that a factory test
conducted by Seller or its Subcontractors was not conducted properly or the
results of the test were inconclusive Purchaser may required Seller to repeat
such test in a fashion as to obtain conclusive results.

Purchaser may request Seller or its Subcontractors to  perform one or more of
its factory  tests using more precise instrumentation than planned, or
conduct a test not in Seller,s or its Subcontractor,s standard factory test
program.  In the case of a Purchaser request for an additional non standard
factory test the conduct of such test shall be subject to mutual agreement by
the parties.

In the event as a result of such Purchaser requested repeat test, ormore
precise instrumentation or non standard test  the Equipment is found to not
be compliant with the requirements of this Agreement, Seller shall correct
such noncompliance and the cost and time associated with such testing shall
be to Seller,s account.  If the Equipment is found to be compliant with this
Agreement, Seller shall be eligible for a Change Orderfor the cost and time
associated with such testing.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 05/21/2001 12:27
PM ---------------------------

John G Rigby@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
05/17/2001 05:13 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Scott
Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ed B
Hearn III/HOU/ECT@ECT, pthompson@akllp.com, Scott
Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Bill Williams/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: World Hunger- Section 9.6 Additional tests

Per the conference call of Wednesday, I revised Section 9.6 (with Scott
fixing my drafting).  Attached document contains a redline of the section.

I think this can be included in the version that goes to GE.  I discussed the
concept with Jim Sutherland- he agreed with relaxing the unilateral
requirement in the case of GE.  We would not want to do this in the case of
other vendors.


Mike, good discussion of our ?.  Even though we may never use the option,
	we do need to know if it is avail. &/or @ what cost, if any.  Please keep us posted
	w/ to what you uncover.  Thanks again.			l.  w.  s.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bodnar, Michael
Sent:	Friday, August 10, 2001 2:34 PM
To:	Medeles, Gerry
Cc:	Threet, Kay; Cabrera, Reyna; Blair, Lynn; Neville, Sue; Swett, Larry
Subject:	Allocation Review

Gerry,
I had some discussions yesterday with Sue Neville and Larry Swett regarding storage allocations. They have a concern that our current procedure may not provide the minimum level of scheduled activity needed to support the physical storage requirements at certain times during the year.  In the month of July, Larry needs to maintain gas flow into Redfield and Lyons. A minimum quantity of 200,000 MMBtu (150,000 @ Redfield and 50,000 @ Lyons) per day is needed to avoid operational problems in the fields. Normally, the daily maximum withdrawal capacity at Cunningham (200,000) is more than enough to handle the contingency. However, there have been times where the net storage activity is less than minimum flow needed to meet minimum injection levels at Redfield and Lyons.

For example, the receipt storage capacity is currently set at 600,000 and delivery capacity at 200,000. This means allocations are only triggered when the net storage activity is greater than a receipt (injection) of 600,000 or delivery (withdrawal) of 200,000. any net storage activity falling between that range continues uninterrupted  It follows then that if the net storage activity is zero (300,000 inj / 300,000 wd) no allocation is needed and if all things were equal, all NNG storage would be shut-in because all the gas destined for storage would be diverted to meet the withdrawal needs of others.

What Sue and Larry suggest is that floor (minimum injections in Summer and minimum withdrawals in the Winter) be factored into the allocation process to provide the minimum activity needed. For example, if we choose to set a floor (minimum) of 100,000 net injections and net storage activity is zero (300,000 inj / 300,000 wd), then storage allocation would be triggered because net storage injections were less than 100,000 MMBtu for that day. This floor would require that 100,000 of the withdrawals be allocated off to achieve a net storage injection floor of 100,000 MMBtu.

Do you think that this floor concept is do-able? If so, how much time would program changes take to complete?
Lets get together next week to discuss further.


We just changed the Sta 45 number from 301 to 318dth.

Matt

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 3:40 PM
To:	Fleming, Matthew B.
Subject:	Trco

What are your Trco volumes again?  I can make changes now without writing new deal tickets.


Yes, I had also heard that Calpine/NPG have passed on the early start date...I think PGT will show this to the market.... no change regarding the 02 issues as of yet.

BT

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lambie, Chris
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 5:14 PM
To:	Tycholiz, Barry
Subject:	RE: PGT Expansion 2003 - Info

We heard today that both Calpine and Newport have passed on the volume made available by PGT for Nov 01 (40,000/d).....  Any news as to what they are thinking for Nov 02?????
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tycholiz, Barry
Sent:	Friday, October 12, 2001 9:33 AM
To:	Grigsby, Mike
Cc:	Lambie, Chris; Miller, Stephanie
Subject:	PGT Expansion 2003 - Info

As you guys know the 2003 PGT expansion plans are supposed to be 230,000/day. The landscape of the shippers list is ever changing... Rumors of PPL pulling out 85,000/day to Malin and Stanfield is unconfirmed ( we are trying to validate)... and potentially Avista pulling out as they have been downgraded... they hold 35,000/day in 2003. Combined this is almost half of the planned expansion.

Although not confirmed the bottom line is as the 03 shippers back out the expansion it becomes compromised and ultimately I believe the 2002 expansion and 2003 expansion start to blend together. As you guys know the 2002 shippers lists of 211,000 / day is made up 2 shippers Calpine 35,000/day and Newport Gen 175,000/day and this expansion has it's own issues.

As we know more about shippers moving around I will pass on... pls do same.

BT


This request has been pending approval for  15 days and you are the alternate.  Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000078936&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000078936
Approver            : sandeep.kohli@enron.com
Request Create Date : 12/11/01 10:28:02 AM
Requested For       : dean.laurent@enron.com
Resource Name       : \\enehou\houston\common\Research - [Read]
Resource Type       : Directory


$0 bid for the Redskins D