Just to pile on with the issues, I will add a few thoughts of my own for
issues that we might want to consider in our November 20 comments.
Re: the application of the price cap to only PX and ISO, Commissioner Massey
is not totally on board.  He specifically asked about capping the forward
market.  He raised the idea that he had gotten from the San Diego hearing
that there be an accepted forward contract for a specified timeframe (18-24
months) and specified rate, and that all loads must buy a minimum percentage
of their needs from this contract.
A staffer (Don Gelinas) asked whether the forward/bilateral market
(presumably uncapped) could take care of investment recovery so that
generation not be cancelled in California.
Dynegy and other marketers raised the issue of the test to be used by the
Commission in reviewing transactions above the soft cap.  Specifically, what
is opportunity cost?  As long as the test is not known until after the fact,
there will be lack of secuity selling into the California and greater
incentive to sell elsewhere.
Hobbs from Williams raised the possibility that if the Commission does not
eliminate the soft cap (his preferred approach), that the cap should be
temporary and escalating and there should be limited time for raising issues
and retaining the refund liability (he suggested that the refund liability be
only for one month).
Many, especially the utilities, raised their position that the Commission
should not institute penalties only on the load.  They claimed this was
one-sided and suggested if penalties were required, they needed to be applied
to the supply side as well.  They also argued that the load could not meet
the 5% test.
Massey had a concern at the end of the day that the Commission's
encouragement of forward contracts will be stymied by the CPUC by their
authority in reviewing prudence of the utilities' purchases.
Larcamp asked at the end of the day for information on the cost of generation
before deregulation - normalized for gas prices and emmission prices of
today.  The marketer on the panel added that we would need to include
stranded costs.
There was almost no support for the single price auction in California.
The California politicians argued that the ISO Board structure needed to be
changed, but that California had jurisdiction to change it, not FERC.  A
Court battle was threatened.

	Steven J Kean
	11/13/2000 08:51 AM

		 To: Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Comments on FERC November 1 order

There are a few other issues we need to look into:

Larcamp told Hartsoe and I after the meeting that FERC may clarify that the
price caps and reporting obligations apply only to bids into the PX and ISO
-- ie no bilateral transaction will be subject to the requirements.  He asked
if knowing this would change any of our views (esp peaking plants, though I
suspect it's already too late for that).  My gut reaction is that so long as
the market continues to clear through the centralized exchanges this
"exemption" for bilateral transactions won't matter much, but let's think it
through.  Is EOL or APX an alternative?
Massey specifically asked us to address forward markets in our comments.
Specifically, "has FERC done everything it can to encourage forward market
development?"  In addition to any other points we might make, I think we
should argue that "PJMing" the market won't facilitate and may even hinder
forward market development.  Also, we should advocate actions by FERC that
take away second-guessing by the CPUC in order to reduce utility fears about
contracting forward.
We have to give the Commission a way out on price caps.  We need to think
through whether there is something we can live with here, or we should take
the approach I took in my testimony:  FERC should encourage the state to
provide rate protection for selected customer classes by putting those
requirements up for bid (ie get the utility out of the commodity business as
much as possible).
Finally, on governence issues we should argue for a narrowe role for the ISO
as a way of diffusing the emotional governence debate.  Analogy:  if the ISO
is simply the air traffic controller all parties will simply be interested in
retaining the most technically competent people (not hiring or appointing
their lackies or friends).  So long as the ISO has a role in setting prices,
acquiring supplies or running the market, it is destined to be controversial
and highly politicized.  Those functions should be left to the market.

	Mary Hain@ECT
	11/10/2000 11:13 AM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Comments on FERC November 1 order

---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 11/10/2000 09:20 AM
---------------------------
________________________

To: Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, steve.c.hall@enron.com, Richard Sanders,
Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron,
jdasovic@ees.enron.com, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe Hartsoe@Enron, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
James E Keller/HOU/EES@EES, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Harry
Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis Benevides, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Richter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Steve
Kean, Richard Shapiro, Tim Heizenrader/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: carrrn@bracepatt.com, dwatkiss@bracepatt.com
From: Mary Hain/HOU/ECT
Date: 11/09/2000 05:19:03 PM
Subject: Comments on FERC November 1 order

For purposes of our discussions, Alan and I have put together an outline of
issues raised in the FERC meeting today that we might consider putting in our
comments to FERC.  Our written comments would also include the issues we have
already raised in our white paper and our oral comments at FERC.  Of course
to the extent we have discussed things in our white paper we could simply
cite the paper.  Given the potentially long list of issues to be addressed, I
haved left a voice mail asking Seabron if he is available to help Alan.


Mark and Jeff,

The Paper & Pulp desk has a customer that they would like to put into a three
year financial deal; however, the credit profile of the customer would
require hefty upfront security.  At the same time, they would like to enter
into a contract wherein ENA purchases all of their production (newsprint) at
index prices.  ENA's payable to this company could run to 10MM/ month.  Can
we draft a netting arrangement that would allow us to net the physical and
financial exposures in the event of a default so that the customer would not
be required to post security for the financial deal?  I think we may have
done something along these lines for a couple of Fred Lagrasta's customers.
I am comfortable that the purchase payable will more than offset the
potential financial exposure, but want to ensure that you are comfortable
that the ability to net these two exposures can be assured through a
contract.  Let me know your thoughts.

Thanks,
Tanya


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Benchluch, Moises
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 2:51 PM
To:	Black, Tamara Jae
Subject:	Presentation

TJ:

Can you pls invite all traders, mid-market and originators.

There will be a presentation on Tuesday, November  21st from 3:30-5:30 pm on the  "Congestion in the transmission system for the Eastern Interconnect"

The conference room will be determined on Monday.

Thanks,

Stephen


what time


I spoke with Ken about the Business Council.  He agreed: errors of commission
are much better than errors of omission.  H e does want to be personally
involved in the invitations from here on and he is very willing to make calls
next week to help get some confirmations.  Deal directly with him . . .
there's no need for me to be in the middle.  Also, a bit of background:
Greenspan is always invited to the reception the night before, but they don't
want to offer him a speaking spot because he won't speak without the press
present.

Thanks again for all your work on the Senate hearing.  I felt overprepared --
which is just how I want to feel -- and every bit of information I needed was
at my fingertips.


Sue,

I shall be available.

Vince

Sue Wadsworth@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
05/11/2000 05:16 PM
To: Mark Keeter/Contractor/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Vince J
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Bloomer/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Ravi Thuraisingham/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Arshak Sarkissian/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Scheduling a Meeting - Important - Please read

Scott Yeager has requested I set up a meeting for Mark Keeter to present to
the group his findings for the 6 month study of Managing Global
Network/Application Service Platform and include managing QoS end to end.

How does Tuesday May 23 in the morning look for everyone?
Mark, how long do you need I will schedule the conference room for.
Also please let me know if anyone else should be invited.

Sue Wadsworth
EB4590A
713-853-5105


Below is a Motion I prepared and filed for EES to get a waiver from the PUCO limiting small commercial contracts to a 2 year term.  If granted, this will allow Enron Direct to blitz the market.  The plan is that for the first 25 MW of load that Rogers Herndon's group tries to do on a physical delivery basis in the Cinergy teritory, that the customers be the small commercial ones marketed by Enron Direct.  (The value proposition on a two year deal is very thin but four years works).

A similar motion filed by Strategic Energy was denied last year.  Prior to filing, I talked with several commissioners and Staff and I think our chances are reasonable (60% chance of success).  I'll keep you posted.

Janine

-----Original Message-----
From: Knight, Laurie
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 2:53 PM
To: Migden, Janine
Subject: FW: MOTION FOR EXPEDITED RULING

-----Original Message-----
From: Knight, Laurie
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 3:17 PM
To: Steve Howard (E-mail)
Subject: MOTION FOR EXPEDITED RULING

Attached is the Motion for Expedited Ruling for filing today.

Thank you
Laurie


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"Rodenburg, Eric" <erodenbu@UtiliCorp.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, January 09, 2002 10:42 AM
To:	Schoolcraft, Darrell; Spraggins, Gary; Carr, James; Blair, Jean; Wilkens, Jerry; Clapper, Karen; Washington, Kathy; Callans, Nancy; Bryan, Randy; Walden, Shirley
Subject:	SUNFLOWER - NNG - HOURLY - 2002.xls

 - SUNFLOWER - NNG - HOURLY - 2002.xls


Julie,

The Camden and North Central contracts are new packages of gas that have yet
to come on-line.  Once production commences, I will request that a spot deal
be put in place.

Bob,

Please create and enter into sitara a ticket based on the following
information:

Counterparty    Meter   Volume   Price    Period

Heatherloch Municipal Utility District 6879   500mmbtu/d   100% IF/HSC less
$0.12  10/1 - 10/31

Julie, please confirm.

Thanks,

vlt
x3-6353

Julie Meyers
09/28/2000 10:52 AM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vance L Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: October Wellhead

The Heatherlock deal had a Single Transaction Agreement attached to it.  When
the contract ended the deal ended.

The other two I believe we just need a email from Vance or Donald setting up
a spot ticket.

Vance could you look into that?   Do I have the wrong contract attached?  Or
is there a new contract.  for Camden & North Central, are those just going to
be spot tickets?

Julie

Daren J Farmer
09/28/2000 07:41 AM
To: Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: October Wellhead

I have rolled or input the following deals for October.

Crosstex 138553  2
Duke  418429  139
Hesco  394798  500
Swift  418431  322
Tri-Union 418432  700
Vintage  403367  300
Whiteoak 418434  96
Whiting  418436  100

So, I am showing that the only deals we have outstanding for Oct are:

Camden/9858  3000
Heatherlock/6879 544  (previous deal#133010)
North Central/5228 3000

Julie - Please check these deals for the correct contract/terms.  Also,
please look into Heatherlock.  Vance is noming gas for this deal.  However,
the deal ticket does not have an evergreen flag. When I tried to roll another
month, I got a message that another contract was needed.

Thanks.

D


The following updates have been made to the EnronOnline Website and should be
available to all customers on their login today:

- Ability to type in volumes in the Submission Box (rather than just using
the arrows)
- Removal of the "Hour Glassing" effect (in which the browser acted like the
site was still loading when it was in fact finished)
- New code to fix the caching server issues which prevented some customers
from successfully upgrading
- Addition of Dow Jones News Feeds (automatic for appropriate categories)

If you have any questions on the above, please contact the EnronOnline Help
Desk at:

Americas: 713 853 4357
Europe: + 44 (0)20 7783 7783
Australia/Asia: +61 2 9229 2300

Dave


Hey, there's still time to view the presentations given by Enron management
at the annual investor conference held in January.

A link to the replay of the webcast is available at www.enron.com.  A list of
the presentations made at the meeting will appear on the screen.  To view a
presentation, simply click on the title.  The entire webcast is about eight
hours long, with each presentation lasting about 45 minutes to one hour.  The
webcast will be available 24 hours-a-day, seven-days-a-week until Feb. 28.

This is an excellent opportunity for you to get the latest information about
Enron's business activities and strategy.  If you encounter problems
accessing the webcast, call 1-888-457-7469 for help.


Drew,

Here is Agave for June.  I also made a change to May.  I was calculating the
differential off of the wrong location index.

DG


Start Date: 1/13/02; HourAhead hour: 17;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011317.txt


To hear is to obey
----- Forwarded by Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT on 10/02/2000 11:28 AM -----

	"Jane Gobe" <jgobe@bracepatt.com>
	10/01/2000 08:05 PM

		 To: <dan.lyons@enron.com>, <rkrantz@stam.rc.com>
		 cc: "W. Cleland Dade" <cdade@bracepatt.com>, "Scott Miller"
<smiller@bracepatt.com>
		 Subject: Attached are clean and redlined versions of the documents we
discussed today. Please note that the

Attached are clean and redlined versions of the documents we discussed
today.  Please note that the redlined versions were prepared in WordPerfect
and then converted to Word, so there may be some minor translation difficulty.

Please call if you have any questions.

 - #1172822 v1 - SECURITIES PURCHASE.CLEAN.doc
 - #1172812 v1 - STRATEGIC ALLIANCE.RED.rtf
 - #1172815 v1 - SECURITIES PURCHASE.RED.doc
 - #1172817 v1 - WARRANT.RED.doc
 - #1172818 v1 - REG RIGHT.RED.doc
 - #1172819 v1 - WARRANT.CLEAN.doc
 - #1172821 v1 - REG RIGHTS.CLEAN.doc
 - #1164859 v8 - STRATEGIC ALLIANCE AGREEMENT.doc


-----Original Message-----
From: 	SloanConsulting@aol.com@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, December 18, 2001 5:29 PM
To:	vkamins@enron.com; mfkeeth@shellus.com; gerald.w.mcelvy@exxonmobil.com; dph@swbll.net; Bob.Peebler@halliburton.com; tina.sivinski@eds.com; bwillia6@us.ibm.com
Cc:	pkumar@uh.edu
Subject:	Tim Tipton input on Seminars/Forums Sub Group

Forwarding to you Tim Tipton's input.

Return-Path: <TNTipton@MarathonOil.com>
Received: from  rly-xb03.mx.aol.com (rly-xb03.mail.aol.com [172.20.105.104]) by air-xb05.mail.aol.com (v82.22) with ESMTP id MAILINXB58-1218115129; Tue, 18 Dec 2001 11:51:29 -0500
Received: from  HOURS205.mgroupnet.com (houinet3.hou.moc.com [192.70.218.5]) by rly-xb03.mx.aol.com (v82.22) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINXB35-1218115056; Tue, 18 Dec 2001 11:50:56 -0500
Received: from HOUEXC202.mgroupnet.com ([89.60.4.15]) by HOURS205.mgroupnet.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.2966);	 Tue, 18 Dec 2001 10:29:18 -0600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4712.0
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;	boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C187E1.213803A2"
Subject: RE: Next Energy Committee Meeting
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 10:29:13 -0600
Message-ID: <55AB91900AB222428BBCDD7E4733BD9195DA39@HOUEXC201.mgroupnet.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Next Energy Committee Meeting
Thread-Index: AcF/KWmG/7GFdenPRiyx09uP2hPE5AIstzFg
From: "Tipton, T N (Tim) " <TNTipton@MarathonOil.com>
To: <SloanConsulting@aol.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Dec 2001 16:29:18.0216 (UTC) FILETIME=[23DCF880:01C187E1]
X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version)

Sub-group questions appear to represent a good cross-section of issues
which will undoubtedly spur additional comments.  (MOC feedback to
surveys attacehd.) See you 1/23.    Tim

-----Original Message-----
From: SloanConsulting@aol.com [mailto:SloanConsulting@aol.com]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 8:13 AM
To: everett.s.gibbs@us.andersen.com; vkamins@enron.com;
mfkeeth@shellus.com; gerald.w.mcelvy@exxonmobil.com; dph@swbell.net;
donna.p.mcginnis@dynegy.com; bob.peebler@halliburton.com;
tina.sivinski@eds.com; bruce.sukaly@cinergy.com; Tipton, T N (Tim) ;
bawilliamson@duke-energy.com; bwillia6@us.ibm.com
Cc: warga@uh.edu; bobcasey@uh.edu; pkumar@uh.edu; ban_bury@swbell.net
Subject: Next Energy Committee Meeting

Energy Committee Members
I wanted to fix the date on your calendar for the next Energy Committee
meeting.  From the feedback received, the best date turned out to be
January
23, 2001 although not everyone could make that. The 5:00 to 7:00 PM
period
seemed to work ok last time so we would try this again on January 23,
2001.
Please mark your calendars accordingly.  We would hope to be getting
your
feedback soon on the specific questions sent out to each of the
sub-groups.
Let us know if you have not received these attachements.  Relative to
the
next meeting agenda, the current thought is as follows:
                          Education sub group discussion output

30 minutes
                          Seminars/ Forums/etc sub group discussion
30
minutes
                          Energy Trading Center sub group discussion
30
minutes
                          Marketing GEMI

         30 minutes
Would appreciate hearing your thoughts of potential additional agenda
items,
and any initial thoughts you might have on marketing.
Happy Holidays,
Lane
 - GEMI.doc


When do we want to get together to call Seabron w/  feedback?
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 05/01/2001
08:34 AM ---------------------------

"Seabron Adamson" <seabron.adamson@frontier-economics.com> on 04/23/2001
09:30:56 PM
To: <James.D.Steffes@enron.com>, <Steven.J.Kean@enron.com>,
<Richard.Shapiro@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Polciy paper draft

Jim/Rick/Steve:

Please see the attached draft. I think I have everything in there we
discussed. Sorry I this has been slower than planned -as I mentioned before
I have been facing a family medical problem.

I will be out of the office for much of the next two days. I can be reached
at (617) 513-5904 (cellphone) or via email. I should be back in the office
full-time from Thursday a.m.

Cheers

Seabron

This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the
addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or
confidential information.  If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me at
(617) 354-0060 and permanently delete the original and any copy of any
e-mail and any printout thereof.

Seabron Adamson
Frontier Economics Inc
Two Brattle Square
Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
Ph:  (617) 354-0060
Fax: (617) 354-0640
seabron.adamson@frontier-economics.com

 - 01-04-23 SA Draft policy paper for review.doc


http://www.caiso.com/docs/2001/11/29/2001112914364821031.pdf.

Thought you would like to see this letter.

Keoni Almeida
California Independent System Operator
phone: 916/608-7053
pager:  916/814-7352
alpha page:  9169812000.1151268@pagenet.net
e-mail:  <mailto:kalmeida@caiso.com>


one more item......will the customer be required to sign both the HPL Online
Application & the OUA?

Michael Eiben
11/17/2000 03:13 PM
To: Eric Gillaspie/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Edward D Gottlob/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Howard B
Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT (bcc: Michael Eiben/HOU/ECT)
Subject: Re: HPL Online Nomination User Agreement and Password Application

We missed you guys at the demo on Tuesday.  I had some questions on the OUA &
password application:

 1) On the HPL Online password application:  I would be in favor of not
including the check verification regarding exchange or view access.
 2) On the OUA:  In the third & fourth paragraph on page 1, it mentions that
counterparty has an existing transportation service      contract with HPL.
Some Operators on HPL may not have a service agreement with HPL.  It also
mentions service contracts in section #1 and   section #4.
 3) On the OUA:  In section #7 - Confidentiality, a reference is made to
6(b).  I could not find a 6(b) anywhere in the document.  Also in section
#8    - General, a reference is made to 6(e) and 7(e).  I could not find
either anywhere.

Other than the above items, both doc's look real good.  thanks for your help.

mve

Eric Gillaspie
11/15/2000 09:10 AM
To: Michael Eiben/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D Gottlob/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: HPL Online Nomination User Agreement and Password Application

Gentlemen,

Attached for your review and comment is the DRAFT Online User Agreement and
Password Application for HPL's Online Nomination-Information Exchange Website.

Thanks,

Eric Gillaspie
713-345-7667
Enron Building 3886


yes sir

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re:

That might work, I'll let ya know.

To: James R Barker/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re:

tonite, tomorrow, and Wed nite all baaaad.  how about thur after you and i
work out?

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re:

What day works for you?   Working out tonite??

To: James R Barker/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re:

I'm here for you buddy.

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Remember me for lunch next week.

JRB


Tim, was it accepted by the court?  Michelle

"Tim C. Carrico" <tcarrico@spilmanlaw.com> on 11/29/2000 12:55:47 PM
To: "Michelle Cash (E-mail)" <michelle.cash@enron.com>
cc: "Charles L. Woody" <cwoody@spilmanlaw.com>
Subject: Enron Answer to Second Amended Complaint;

Michelle,

 Today, I faxed you a copy of the Plaintiff's Second Amended
Complaint.  I am in the process of creating Enron's answer based on my
conversations with McClellan, Reck, McQuade.  I need to ask you a couple of
questions regarding the answer;  Please call me at your earliest possible
convenience.

Tim C. Carrico
Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC
email: tcarrico@spilmanlaw.com
phone:             (304)-340-3856
cell phone:       (304)-549-2681
fax:                  (304)-340-3801
address:           300 Kanawha Blvd., East
                       Charleston, W.Va. 25301


Larry - I've received a copy of the compliance order.  It assesses a penalty
of $15,000 per day for each day of violation (May 1996 to September 8, 1997
or  496 days).  This results in a fine of $7.44 million.  I hope the order
has a typo and the NMED meant a penalty of "up to" $15,000 per day of
violation. If this is not a typo I see no downside to asking for a hearing
and a settlement conference. We may do so anyway.  Since we only have till
mid-July to file the request for hearing which must include very specific
admissions or denials and the basis of our affirmative defenses, I'd like
Larry to flesh out the notes below and pull any relevant documentation
together.....

Dave - let's discuss counsel for this matter in the morning and I'd like to
make a call to NMED counsel.  I'd be tempted to bring Braddock in even though
this is New Mexico...

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Nutt, David
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 5:59 AM
To: Soldano, Louis
Subject: RE: Compliance Order, P-1 C/S

Lou -- I spoke with Larry the other evening about this and will be more than
happy to work on it until you resurface. I'm actually out of the office all
next week while on vacation in Florida but I'll have a computer (email
capable) with me so I'll be in touch.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Soldano, Louis
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 5:53 PM
To: Nutt, David
Subject: FW: Compliance Order, P-1 C/S

dave - can you keep at it until the end of next week??  we have another mega
deal we are tryig to close by then....thx
 -----Original Message-----
From:  Campbell, Larry [mailto:Larry.Campbell@ENRON.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 5:45 PM
To: Shafer, John; Kendrick, William
Cc: Jensen, Ruth; Phillips, Marc; Nutt, David; Soldano, Louis; Jolly, Rich
Subject: Compliance Order, P-1 C/S

Transwestern received a Compliance Order from the State of New Mexico, Air
Quality Bureau, for an outstanding turbine replacement activity at the P-1
C/S which occurred in 1996.   Transwestern had met with the AQB over this
issue in 1996 and assumed that the issue had been resolved, as no further
actions were received from the agency until this Compliance Order was
received. The issue in question was Transwestern's replacement of
interchangeable internal components from a 4700 turbine into the existing
smaller turbine (3505).  The larger internal components  (inlet guide
vanes/nozzles) which were placed into the 3505 were mechanically derated to
simulate conditions of the smaller turbine.  When Transwestern received
permit approval from the AQB to operate at the larger turbine capacity,
Transwestern made the upgrade adjustments and then operated at the higher
turbine value 4700.  The AQB did not understand that Transwestern could not
make the adjustments to the inlet guide vanes as any such activity by
Transwestern would void the warranty with Soalr Mfg.  Only Solar is
authorized to make adjustments to the turbine.  This prevents Transwestern
from randomly and arbitrarily manipulating and adjusting horsepowers of this
turbine at their descretion.

In the 1996 meeting with the AQB, Transwestern committed to conducting a
emissions test of the 4700 to determine if emissions were more or less than
the permitted values for the 3505.  It was shown that emissions from the 4700
were less than that permitted by the AQB for the 3505.  It should also be
mentioned that the 3505 was a regerative turbine and the 4700 is a simple
cycle.

  Apparently, EPA has mandated that the AQB act on all issues considered to
be outstanding as determined by the EPA.  Dave Nutt has been sent the
Compliance Order to review.  Under the conditions of the Order, Transwestern
has 30 days to request another hearing.

Id like to have a group discussion to decide how Transwestern will manage and
handle this issue.  Would someone contact Anabelle and have her set up a
conference call for sometime next week?


George Strong's contract with Enron expires on June 30, 2001.  Do I need to
draft a letter thanking him for his service to Enron?  Or, should someone
else send a letter?  Is it better to merely allow the contract to expire?
Please advise.

Joe is planning to attend NCSL in San Antonio in August.  He indicated today
that he wants to attend the Southern Legislative Conference in Georgia in
July .  I am planning to attend both of these conferences.   What are your
thoughts?  Is it proper for me to approve reasonable travel for him, or would
you prefer to discuss in advance?

Should we organize some type of lunch or celebration for Joe's retirement or
transition to consultant?

Thanks, Jean


nothing more sexy than a girl that can dance


We don't have revised versions yet.  when we do, we will probably only want
to put some (not all) of the documents on the intranet.

Gavin Dillingham@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
08/24/2000 02:06 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: RE: Luntz Focus Groups (1 of 4)

Have we received the newly revised principles, facts and statements for the
Luntz Focus Groups? I was hoping to place these on the California power issue
database.

Thanks,

Gavin
---------------------- Forwarded by Gavin Dillingham/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
08/24/2000 02:05 PM ---------------------------

Elizabeth Linnell@ENRON
08/21/2000 12:41 PM
Sent by: Elizabeth Linnell@ENRON
To: Gavin Dillingham/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: RE: Luntz Focus Groups (1 of 4)

---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron on 08/21/2000
12:41 PM ---------------------------

Maureen McVicker
08/21/2000 11:43 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
cc:

Subject: RE: Luntz Focus Groups (1 of 4)

---------------------- Forwarded by Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron on 08/21/2000
11:41 AM ---------------------------

"Elizabeth A. VanDersarl" <liz@luntz.com> on 08/21/2000 09:11:34 AM
To: "'skean@enron.com'" <skean@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: Luntz Focus Groups (1 of 4)

Hi Steven,

 Attached is the first of four documents that we have prepared for
the focus groups.  All of the exercises are works in progress and I am
sending them to you for comments. (Hopefully, we are on the right track.)
As we discussed, I am happy to fly down to Houston tomorrow so that we can
review these materials together.  If, however, you feel that we can edit the
exercises via email that's fine too. Just let me know which arrangement
makes you the most sense to you. Hope all is well.

Regards,

Liz

 <<anti regulation speech.doc>> An anti-dereg speech is in the works.

 - anti regulation speech.doc

---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron on 08/21/2000
12:41 PM ---------------------------

Maureen McVicker
08/21/2000 11:43 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
cc:

Subject: RE: Luntz Focus Groups (2 of 4)

---------------------- Forwarded by Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron on 08/21/2000
11:43 AM ---------------------------

"Elizabeth A. VanDersarl" <liz@luntz.com> on 08/21/2000 09:15:16 AM
To: "'skean@enron.com'" <skean@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: Luntz Focus Groups (2 of 4)

Attached please find a sheet of facts regarding deregulation.

 <<Facts 2.doc>>

 - Facts 2.doc

---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron on 08/21/2000
12:41 PM ---------------------------

Maureen McVicker
08/21/2000 11:43 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
cc:

Subject: RE: Luntz Focus Groups (3 of 4)

---------------------- Forwarded by Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron on 08/21/2000
11:43 AM ---------------------------

"Elizabeth A. VanDersarl" <liz@luntz.com> on 08/21/2000 09:18:16 AM
To: "'skean@enron.com'" <skean@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: Luntz Focus Groups (3 of 4)

Attached please find a sheet of principles.  We would like your suggestions
for 3 or 4 more.

 <<Principles 2.doc>>

 - Principles 2.doc

---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron on 08/21/2000
12:41 PM ---------------------------

Maureen McVicker
08/21/2000 11:44 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
cc:

Subject: RE: Luntz Focus Groups (4 of 4)

---------------------- Forwarded by Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron on 08/21/2000
11:43 AM ---------------------------

"Elizabeth A. VanDersarl" <liz@luntz.com> on 08/21/2000 09:19:26 AM
To: "'skean@enron.com'" <skean@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: Luntz Focus Groups (4 of 4)

Attached please find a sheet of pro and con statements.

 <<Statements.doc>>

 - Statements.doc


?

[IMAGE]
Over 1000 cases posted by  Houstonians!!!?
?
?
We are HoustonLawyers.com!
You have heard about us, now  learn about us!!
?
If you would like a free opportunity  to review?these cases reply to this
e-mail and we will send you a trial  username and password. You be the?Judge!
 Contact us now at info@houstonlawyers.com or call 713.533.9777.
 - got caught.jpg
 - HLInvitation.doc


I THOUGHT YOU WOULD SEND ME THE MEMO; REVISED TO REFLECT YOUR COMMENTS AND
MONA'S COMMENTS.  THE SPREAD SHEET LOOKS NICE THOUGH ...

please send the memo, edited as you see fit, to this e-mail address.
thanks.

----- Original Message -----
From: <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>
To: <Paul.Kaufman@enron.com>; <manretz@email.msn.com>
Sent: Friday, October 06, 2000 3:38 PM

> Heres' the spreadsheet.  I added "regulatory intelligence and expertise"
> right after the top 5.  Check it out.
>
> Best,
> Jeff
> (See attached file: CALIFORNIA STRATEGY 1006.xls)


Just a follow up on this issue. Most of the October PPAs have been processed with a few exceptions. Hopefully, all will be complete at the end of this week. We are still working on finding a way to systematically identify the late charts. I'll keep you advised of the progress on that front.
 Have a safe holiday !
Gary.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Anderson, Gary E.
Sent:	Monday, December 17, 2001 12:21 PM
To:	Blair, Lynn
Subject:	RE: October (Forward) Positive Displacement Meter PPA Status

All of the MidAmerican corrections for October have been made with the exception of 0737181-01,0737021-01, & 0737021-02. The charts were never received form these locations. Dan Boswell has been out of the office due to his Father's death but should be back tomorrow. We'll get a handle on the other outstanding PPAs this week.
Thanks-
Gary

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Blair, Lynn
Sent:	Tuesday, December 11, 2001 10:46 AM
To:	Anderson, Gary E.; Stern, Ellis; Barnes, Caroline
Cc:	Floyd, Jodie; Dietz, Rick; Zadow, Raetta; Corman, Shelley; Neubauer, Dave; Barker, Courtney; Semin, Frank; Blair, Lynn; January, Steve
Subject:	October (Forward) Positive Displacement Meter PPA Status

	Gary and Caroline, as of today, we have emailed a list by station (7 and/or 16 day charts) to the measurement
	group which needs to be read for PPA's to correct the daily volumes fro the following shippers:

		MidAmerican - 147 stations (It is my understanding you have already 44 of the 147)
		IES - 87 stations
		Interstate Power - 6 stations
		Wisconsin Power and Light - 11 stations

	In order for Gas Logistics to keep track of the ones that need to be corrected, we would like for Measurement to send
	us updates on the following information ASAP:

		1.  Which station numbers have or have not been corrected for October.

		2.  How many October charts have been received and how many are outstanding

		3.  Provide status of November chart information.

	Gas Logistics needs the October corrections in the system by December 19th, which is the time
	frame for the first prior period run.  This is important for us to be able to review the prior period invoices.
	As you 	find there are missing charts, if we can be of assistance in calling the field, please let us know.
	This way, the measurement group can concentrate on reading the charts.

	We appreciate your assistance and help in tracking these prior periods and helping each of us to keep focused
	to get these prior period corrections done by the next months billing.  If you have any questions, please let
	Rick or I know.  Thanks. Lynn


All trades were originally confirmed in the name of Dow Hydrocarbons and
Resources Inc.  The Dow trader (Mike Blillings) subsequently contacted the
desk and requested that all trades be booked in the name of "The Dow Chemical
Company".  Mary Gosnell contacted Cathy Tudon in credit and Cathy approved
the changes.  Let me know if you have any comment for the desk.  SS
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 07/21/99 09:17
AM ---------------------------

Dale Neuner on 07/21/99 08:01:54 AM
To: Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Outstanding financial trades with "The Dow Chemical Company"

Mary, please see my initial findings below, and can you follow-up with Sara -
as I am sure there is some history here.

Dale
3-9746

Sara Shackleton
07/20/99 02:07 PM
To: Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Outstanding financial trades with "The Dow Chemical Company"

RE:  Deal Nos.
EY 6926 OMNIBUS  PROPANE 6/30 Credit Rpt says Dow Hydrocarbons...
EY 8108 OMNIBUS  PROPANE 7/02 Credit Rpt says Dow Hydrocarbons...
EY 8531 OMNIBUS  PROPANE 7/06 Credit Rpt says Dow Hydrocarbons...
EY 9343 Status=GENERATED PROPANE 7/07 Credit Rpt says Dow Hydrocarbons...
EQ 6930.1, .2 OMNIBUS  ETHELYNE/ 11/2/98
     ETHANE  I don't have a C/R back this far

ECT does NOT have a master with The Dow Chemical Company.  Are these trades
booked on an omnibus?  I am not certain that credit approved these trades.
Are they all propane?  We need to discuss.  SS


Brian,

Attached is the exhibit list for the GE-Enron contracts.  What I have
attempted to do is list what exhibits I see that are finished and what ones
still require action.  All exhibits highlighted in yellow are closed from
GE's perspective. Please review the list and let me know if you agree with
the status at this point.  Once we do that we can figure out how best to
close up the other exhibits.

Thanks,

Steve Swift

 <<Exhibit list.doc>>

 - Exhibit list.doc


Attached is an updated status report re ENA litigation.


I just received a copy of a Section 5 complaint filed by SoCal requesting a
FERC order 1) determining that the SoCalGas/Topock delivery point is fully
subscribed on a firm primary basis, 2) directing El Paso to comply with
previous Commission orders that preclude the selling of firm primary capacity
at points where none is available and 3) directing El Paso to schedule
capacity acquired during an open season (effective Jan. 1, 2000) into
SoCal/Topock on a secondary basis only.  SoCal states that it has experienced
daily cuts of up to 57% and averaging 25%.

If you would like a copy of the complaint, let me know.


Lavorato Self Evaluation/Accomplishments

I'm just simply better than everyone else.


Attached is our form of Confidentiality Agreement which we would prefer to
use.  If after reviewing our agreement you still prefer to use your own form,
Carol St. Clair, an attorney in our group will have to get back to you with
our comments.   I will wait to hear from you.


Following please find the Daily EnronOnline Executive Summary.

EnronOnline Executive Summary for 11/28/00
Transaction Summary
External Transactions Today	5,219
Average Daily External Transactions (30 day Trailing Avg)	3,858
Total Life to Date Transactions	474,044

EnronOnline Daily % of Entity's Total Transactions for 11/28/00	Trans	Percent
Enron North America	4,590	77%
Enron Europe Limited	186	35%
Global Products	204	35%
Enron Metals	239	13%

EnronOnline Percentage of Total Corporate Transactions
(30 day Trailing Avg)	52%

Gross Notional Value of EnronOnline Transactions	Total
Today	3,909,144,111
MTD	56,951,635,370
LTD	270,380,339,786
Average Daily Notional Value (30 Day Trailing Avg)	2,721,718,263

Notional Revenue from Physical Flows to Date	18,394,732,074

Counterparties, Users, and Products Offered
Counterparties having transacted to date	580
New Counterparties transacting for the first time today	1
Number of Products Offered Today	1,163
Total Number of External Users Logged on Today	3,177
Average # of External Users logged on (30 day Trailing Avg)	2,835


Our UNCF Walk-a-thon was a success!
Over 300 walkers signed up to walk with the Enron team and more than 150 walkers came out in the storming rain to walk for education.
Over $20,000 in pledges has been collected as of today.
Great job team!

Now it's time to finalize collections. Please email me your team captain worksheet and turn in collected pledges by 5 p.m. tomorrow (10/11).  The worksheets will be used to report pledges and collections, report walkers recruited, account for t-shirts, identify UNCF gifts to be awarded, identify walkers who qualify for the Special $100 drawing and complete Enron 2001 Matching. We will also copy and paste the worksheets to create a walker master list. Therefore, it is important that your worksheet columns are in the same order as the attached worksheet. Leave any walker on your worksheet that received an Enron or UNCF t-shirt, even if the potential walker did not turn in the $30 minimum. T-shirts that you received for these walkers must be turned in to me because UNCF requires a sponsor form with a minimum $30 contribution for each t-shirt awarded.  Feel free to call me (ext. 36951) if you have any questions.

I would like to have all pledges collected by Monday, October 15th so that we can pick up our prizes from the UNCF office.

NOTE: I have moved to EB4260. It's hard to find, so call me and I will meet you in the elevator area on the 42nd floor.


> Mr. Lay
>
> 	I have no idea if you will get this letter, but if you do please
> take a minute and read it. My name is Kijana K. Wright, and I have been
> trying to gain a position with Enron for almost a year now, and I refuse
> to give up. I have interviewed with some of your VP's including John
> Ambler, in particular, he was very impressed however there was simply no
> position available. I know that Enron is always in the need for
> outstanding people. I guarantee you that I am one. I can make a difference
> in any department and in any situation, because I have the drive and the
> will. The only thing that I need is the opportunity to prove myself. I
> have submitted my information several times via the internet, but have
> rarley gotten any response. So I figure why not go to the top. I
> understand that you are extremly busy, but I also know great companies are
> made up of great people, why not add one.  I thank you in advance for
> letting me bend your ear. Take care, don't worry the market will rebound
> and Enron will be back on top.
>
> Respectfully
>
> Kijana Wright
> (713)773-0401


John,

Please review the attached spreadsheets (Stack and Website) and note any changes.

Thank you,

Stephanie Sever
EnronOnline
713-853-3465


---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 03/31/2000
03:20 PM ---------------------------

Regina Blackshear@ENRON
03/30/2000 04:59 PM
To: vblack4538@aol.com, sonia_l_castorena@reliantenergy.com,
Amber.Ebow@enron.com, Tammy Green <tcgreen@flash.net>, GRHRDH@aol.com,
jacelyne hill <YELLOWGIRLHILL@netscape.net>, rhondamjordan@hotmail.com,
"BENEDICT PETERS"<bouncing98@hotmail.com>, rosemary.a.reynolds@usa.xerox.com,
"WhiteBL(Barbara)"<BLWhite@equiva.com>, Yvonne Acosta/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Michelle Neville/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eve Puckett/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Judy
Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirlet Williams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tharsilla
Broussard/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John Whiting/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fwd: FW: A POEM FOR THE F-A-M-I-L-Y

this is nice
---------------------- Forwarded by Regina Blackshear/Corp/Enron on
03/30/2000 03:55 PM ---------------------------

"LaTonya Carter" <l_carter61@hotmail.com> on 03/30/2000 03:49:07 PM
To: anthonya@risecom.net, dana62_@hotmail.com, regina.blackshear@enron.com,
music@axs4u.net, DBUAKA1998@aol.com, v_ashford@hotmail.com
cc:

Subject: Fwd: FW: A POEM FOR THE F-A-M-I-L-Y

>From: "Alvita McKinney" <vitamae47@hotmail.com>
>To: queen33@hotmail.com, fdeary@hotmail.com, derexw@hotmail.com,
>l_carter61@hotmail.com, asmith@pwe.ci.houston.tx.us,
>fbrown@pwe.ci.houston.tx.us, ckizzee@pwe.ci.houston.tx.us, deiedre@usa.com,
>sweetmama_nicey@hotmail.com, dishonest19@hotmail.com, c-traylor@ti.com,
>asiaabdullah@ProdigyBiz.net, Karibbean@excite.com, valliar2000@yahoo.com,
>lewisf@TIRR.TMC.EDU, Juan_Johnson@hotmail.com, Onlysexylady@aol.com,
>KalimahAbdullah@PZLQS.com, dmukes@pwe.ci.houston.tx.us,
>suebeehoney25@hotmail.com
>Subject: Fwd: FW: A POEM FOR THE F-A-M-I-L-Y
>Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 09:43:54 CST
>
>
>
>>>ENJOY THIS READING.
>>
>>>A POEM FOR THE F-A-M-I-L-Y
>>>
>>> > I ran into a stranger as he passed by.
>>> > "Oh, excuse me please" was my reply.
>>> >
>>> > He said, "Please excuse me too;
>>> > wasn't even watching for you."
>>> >
>>> > We were very polite, this stranger and I.
>>> > We went on our way and we said good-bye.
>>> >
>>> > But at home a different story is told,
>>> > How we treat our loved ones, young and old.
>>> >
>>> > Later that day, cooking the evening meal,
>>> > My daughter stood beside me very still.
>>> >
>>> > When I turned, I nearly knocked her down.
>>> > "Move out of the way," I said with a frown.
>>> >
>>> > She walked away, her little heart broken.
>>> > I didn't realize how harshly I'd spoken.
>>> >
>>> > While I lay awake in bed,
>>> > God's still small voice came to me and said,
>>> >
>>> > "While dealing with a stranger, common courtesy you use,
>>> > But the children you love, you seem to abuse.
>>> >
>>> > Look on the kitchen floor,
>>> > You'll find some flowers there by the door.
>>> >
>>> > Those are the flowers she brought for you.
>>> > She picked them herself, pink, yellow and blue.
>>> >
>>> > She stood quietly not to spoil the surprise,
>>> > and you never saw the tears in her eyes."
>>> >
>>> > By this time, I felt very small
>>> > and now my tears began to fall.
>>> >
>>> > I quietly went and knelt by her bed;
>>> > "Wake up, little girl, wake up," I said.
>>> >
>>> > "Are these the flowers you picked for me?"
>>> > She smiled, "I found 'em, out by the tree.
>>> >
>>> > I picked 'em because they're pretty like you.
>>> > I knew you'd like 'em, especially the blue."
>>> >
>>> > I said, "Daughter, I'm sorry for the way I acted today;
>>> > I shouldn't have yelled at you that way."
>>> >
>>> > She said, "Oh, Mom, that's okay. I love you anyway."
>>> > I said, "Daughter, I love you too,
>>> >
>>> > and I do like the flowers, especially the blue."
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > ====================================================
>>> >
>>> > Are you aware that:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > If we die tomorrow, the company that we are working for could easily
>>> > replace us in a matter of days. But the family we left behind will
>>>feel
>>> > the loss for the rest of their lives. And come to think of it, we pour
>>> > ourselves more into work than to our family - an unwise investment
>>> > indeed. So what is behind the story?
>>> >
>>> > You know what is the full word of family?
>>> > FAMILY = (F)ATHER (A)ND (M)OTHER, (I) (L)OVE (Y)OU ?
>>> >
>>> > It is worthwhile to share more time with them as they are getting
>>>older.
>>> > Make balance among all things.
>>> >
>>> > Fill life with love and bravery and we shall live a life uncommon.
>>
>

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com


Kal will be finishing mine shortly. Please be prepared to do the 3 hole punch thing 20 times. Thanks.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Spiller, Tina
Sent:	Tuesday, May 29, 2001 1:02 PM
To:	Bartlett, Jeff; Beck, Sally; Bibi, Philippe A.; Gros, Thomas D.; Hotte, Steve; Jones, Robert W.- HR Exec; Kanellopoulos, Drew; Palmer, Mark S.; Perlman, Beth; Raghavan, Suresh; Roper, Kerry; Rub, Jenny; Shelby, Rex; Taylor, Mark; Wax, Brandon; Webb, Jay; Zipper, Andy
Cc:	McCurley, Peggy; Flores-Cuellar, Brenda; Houser, Rita; Costello, Lisa; Guerrero, Alisha; Fuentes, Irma; Westbrook, Cherylene R.; Escamilla, Grisela; Jones, Susan; Cromwell, Sheri L.; Keiser, Holly; Weatherstone, Mary; Cannon, Lydia
Subject:	ENW Management Offsite - Tomorrow

REMINDER --

Opening comments start promptly at 8:00 a.m., so please allow plenty of time to arrive at the Houstonian, park and have breakfast.  The Houstonian is located at 111 North Post Oak Boulevard, phone 713-680-2626.  Our meeting will be held in the Cottonwood Room.

Dress code for the day is casual.

If you haven't turned in your presentation yet, please bring 20 copies to the meeting, 3-hole punched at the top.  You will also have to bring your presentation on a CD so I can load it on the laptop.

Tina Spiller
Assistant to Greg Piper
Chief Operating Officer
Enron Net Works LLC
Office 713.853.5746
tina.spiller@enron.com


GT,

Thanks for taking care of the ring and thanks again for the hosptality.  I
will be back in not too long.  See Ya

G$


No not the HR Spy.  I was in the middle of emailing you when Jennifer walked
up to chit chat.  I didn't even think about it and left my email up the whole
time she was here.  But I went back and read it and I hadn't written anything
incriminating yet.

Talk to ya later.  How was Spanish?

Gabriel Monroy
12/11/2000 10:30 AM
To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: I FINISHED!

C'moon tell me. What happened? What do you mean you almost got busted? Spy?


---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 03/06/2001 04:40
PM ---------------------------

"Piasio, Stephen [FI]" <stephen.piasio@ssmb.com> on 02/23/2001 08:09:13 AM
To:
cc:
Subject: FW: 2001 Natural Gas Production and Price Outlook Conference Call

>  <<...OLE_Obj...>>
>
> 2001 Natural Gas Production and Price Outlook Conference Call
>
>
>  <<...OLE_Obj...>> Salomon Smith Barney <<2001 Natural Gas Conference
> Call.doc>>
> Energy Research Group
> Analyst Access Conference Call
>
> 2001 Natural Gas  Production and Price Outlook
> Hosted by:
> Bob Morris and Michael Schmitz
>  Oil and Gas Exploration & Production Analysts
>
>  Date & Time:
> FRIDAY (February 23rd)
> 11:00 a.m. EST
>
> Dial-in #:
>  US:   800-229-0281 International:  706-645-9237
>
> Replay #: (Reservation: x 819361)
>  US:   800-642-1687 International: 706-645-9291
>
> Accessing Presentation:
> * Go to https://intercallssl.contigo.com
> * Click on Conference Participant
> * Enter Event Number:  x716835
> * Enter the participant's Name, Company Name & E-mail address
> * Click Continue to view the first slide of the presentation
>
> Key Points:
> 1. Natural gas storage levels appear to be on track to exit March at
> roughly 700-800 Bcf, compared with just over 1,000 Bcf last year at the
> end of the traditional withdrawal season.
> 2. Meanwhile, domestic natural gas production should rise 3.0-5.0% this
> year, largely dependent upon the extent of the drop in rig efficiency, or
> production added per rig.
> 3. Nonetheless, under most scenarios, incorporating numerous other
> variables such as the pace of economic expansion, fuel switching and
> industrial plant closures, it appears that storage levels at the beginning
> of winter will be near or below last year's 2,800 Bcf level.
> 4. Thus, it appears likely that the "heat" will remain on natural gas
> prices throughout 2001.
> 5. Consequently, we believe that many E&P shares will post solid gains
> again this year, spurred largely by mounting confidence in the
> sustainability of strong natural gas prices.
>
>

 - 2001 Natural Gas Conference Call.doc


You're right!  Thanks for catching it.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Anderson, Diane
Sent:	Thursday, November 08, 2001 2:12 PM
To:	Heard, Marie
Subject:	RE: Proposed Confirmation Language

Acknowledgement of relation transactions?   Not "related" ?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Heard, Marie
Sent:	Thursday, November 08, 2001 1:56 PM
To:	Anderson, Diane
Subject:	FW: Proposed Confirmation Language

Hi, Diane!

Here's Leslie's e-mail with the revised paragraph.  She said that the revision is "Acknowledgement of relation transactions".  Let me know if you have any questions or need anything else.

THANKS!!!!!

Marie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hansen, Leslie
Sent:	Thursday, November 08, 2001 12:51 PM
To:	Heard, Marie
Subject:	FW: Proposed Confirmation Language

Marie:

Can you please forward the following paragraph to the confirm desk and ask them to revise confirmationYH2566.1, YH2564.1 and YH2567.1 by replacing the first full paragraph on page 2 of each of the three confirmations (replacing the paragraph that begins "Each of the parties to this Agreement recognizes and acknowledges that the parties are acting and agreeing to perform their obligations hereunder in reliance upon . . . ") with the paragraph that follows.  When they have completed the revision, please ask them to reissue the confirmations to Bank of Montreal and Reliant, respectively.  Please ask the confirm desk to send a copy of the Bank of Montreal confirm to Diane Bruning in the legal department IN ADDITION TO Bank of Montreal's confirmation group.  Diane's fax number is 646-366-1724.

Thanks

Leslie

Here's the new paragraph:

Each of the parties to this Transaction recognizes and acknowledges that the parties are acting and agreeing to perform their obligations hereunder in reliance upon contemporaneous, offsetting and related Transactions which were entered into between Reliant Energy Services, Inc. and Enron North America Corp., and Enron North America Corp. and Bank of Montreal, on the Trade Date, contemporaneously herewith. The effectiveness of this Transaction shall be subject to the condition that Bank of Montreal and Enron North America Corp., and Enron North America Corp. and Reliant Energy Services, Inc. entered into offsetting and related Transactions, contemporaneously on the Trade Date.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	SStofer@reliant.com@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, November 08, 2001 11:41 AM
To:	Hansen, Leslie
Subject:	Proposed Confirmation Language

Hello, Leslie:

Dede Russo requested that I e-mail the attached language to you for review.

Please let me know if you approve or have comments.

Thanks very much!

Sherry Stofer
(713) 207-5893

(See attached file: Ring Trades-Bank of Montreal-Enron NA 11-8-01.doc)

 - Ring Trades-Bank of Montreal-Enron NA 11-8-01.doc << File: Ring Trades-Bank of Montreal-Enron NA 11-8-01.doc >>


We may be dining with my brother and Sister in law tomorrow around 6:30 PM.
Comments ???? Questions?????


Where are you?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Parks, Joe
Sent:	Monday, January 07, 2002 8:59 AM
To:	Stalford, Robert
Subject:

Hey, tack me down when you get a moment.

Joe
39636


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 11/02/2000
02:47 PM ---------------------------

From:  Cassandra Schultz @ ENRON
               10/31/2000 02:47 PM

To: Michael Moulton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Kim/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: David Port/Market Risk/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kristin Albrecht/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, James
Ginty/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Christian
LeBroc/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robbi Rossi/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Bjorn Hagelmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barry Pearce/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: DRAM Interim Policy Draft Approval

Michael and Steve -

Thanks for coming to the Risk Forum luncheon today, we enjoyed hearing about
the new business opportunity.

Attached is a first draft of the approval form we'll want to circulate to the
various functional signers for approval prior to sending to Rick Buy and
Skilling for approval and granting of the limits - after we've completed.  I
cut and pasted from information you provided, and have highlighted the areas
that are missing information.  Please review and coordinate with the various
functions and get back to David Port or to me with the missing information or
any comments you have.

As for the Risk Assessment, we might want to take a look at that - I just cut
and pasted the SWOT analysis in from the business plan so far.  I'll talk to
David.  If any of the functional areas have specific issues we should
document that will need to be addressed later at some point, let's make a
note of them in this interim policy document so we don't lose track of them.

I'm also enclosing the Authorized Trader List  and Authorized Products List
that will need to be completed once we figure out who will be designated the
official head trader for this commodity group (will that be you?  Wade
Dosier?), and the presentation prepared by you for those who did not receive.

As far as Market Risk Management, we work as a team here, so feel free to
contact either David at x39823 or me at x30429 - I handle the risk policy and
procedures side, whereas David  is taking the lead on this new initiative
from a market risk perspective and will be addressing specific business and
technical issues.  Christian LeBroc at x58062 will also be working for David
reviewing the quantitative risk parameters.

Regards,
Cassandra.


Attached please find attached confirmation for 01/12/02 through 01/14/02.  Yes, Linda, I am finished!

TK


Harry  - Vivian Siao Stephan at Goldman Sachs gave me your Login ID.  It
is   ARORAH.  The system prompts you to  set up your PASSWORD.  Vivian said
that she would have a customer service representative call you to walk you
through the system over the phone.    In case you need to speak with Vivian,
her telephone number is (212) 902-1429.

 Please call Sara Shackleton at 3-5620 or me if you have any questions.

Susan D. Flynn
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB3806
Houston, Texas  77002
Phone:  713-853-0975
Fax:  713-646-3490


thanks for the words of encouragement


---------------------- Forwarded by Sandra F Brawner/HOU/ECT on 11/10/2000
02:47 PM ---------------------------

LCJO@dynegy.com on 11/10/2000 10:39:21 AM
To: TJRO@dynegy.com, JJDA@dynegy.com, GGHA@dynegy.com, SAHA@dynegy.com,
LJx4@swbell.net, johns@amerexenergy.com, sandra.f.brawner@enron.com
cc:
Subject: FW: good for a CLEAN LAUGH

DON'T WORRY....NOTHING DISTASTEFUL HERE.  VERY FUNNY THOUGH.

---------------------- Forwarded by Lance C Jordan/HOU/Dynegy on 11/10/2000
10:37 AM ---------------------------

Andrew Benanti <ABenanti@prebon.com> on 11/09/2000 02:39:53 PM

To:   "'lcjo@dynegy.com'" <lcjo@dynegy.com>
cc:

Subject:  FW: good for a laugh

----------
From:  Terry Simmons
Sent:  Thursday, November 09, 2000 3:33 PM
To:  Andrew Benanti; Kevin Amerio
Subject:  FW: good for a laugh

----------
From:     Ken Newman[SMTP:knewman@falconsafety.com]
<mailto:[SMTP:knewman@falconsafety.com]>
Reply To:      knewman@falconsafety.com <mailto:knewman@falconsafety.com>
Sent:     Thursday, November 09, 2000 3:33 PM
To:  Bud Katzmann (E-mail); Bud Pellechia (E-mail); Dave Kells (E-mail);
Dave Savino (E-mail); Dean Mitchell (E-mail); Harold Newman (E-mail); Holly
Westra (E-mail); Jeff Rehling (E-mail); Jim Lomker (E-mail); Jim Laudenbach
(E-mail); John Colarusso (E-mail); John Schuberth (E-mail); Ken Niese
(E-mail); Michelle Wollman (E-mail); Paul Klein (E-mail); Pete Joachim
(E-mail); Rich Stout (E-mail); Steve Johnson (E-mail); T Pier - Work
(E-mail); Terry Gutshall (E-mail); Terry Simmons (E-mail); Tom Silvia
(E-mail); ballstriker@aol.com <mailto:ballstriker@aol.com>
Subject:  FW: good for a laugh

 <<funny_pics.doc>>

If you don't laugh at these you need a vacation!
-----Original Message-----
From: Michelle Symonds [mailto:MLSYMONDS@klsm.com]
<mailto:[mailto:MLSYMONDS@klsm.com]>
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 3:02 PM
To: Diane Estabrooks (E-mail); George Soukas (E-mail); Ken Newman
(E-mail); Marie Stagnitti (E-mail); Matt Blasick (E-mail); Michael
Gibbons (E-mail); Bethany A. Curry; Megan Forney
Subject: good for a laugh

 <<funny_pics.doc>>

Some of these are pretty funny!

(See attached file: funny_pics.doc)

 - funny_pics.doc


Thanks a lot for the info. I'll contact her and I'll
let you know how it proceeds.

David Junus

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games
http://sports.yahoo.com


*  See text in red for quick read
*  New York Times yesterday

---------------------- Forwarded by Jennifer Rudolph/HOU/EES on 05/03/2001
10:48 AM ---------------------------

Susan J Mara@ENRON
05/02/2001 11:57 AM

Power Concern Offers California a Secret Deal

By JEFF GERTH and LOWELL BERGMAN

 Duke Energy, a power-generating company accused of overcharging
customers millions of dollars during California's year-old energy
crisis, has secretly offered Gov. Gray Davis a deal that it hopes
will solve its legal problems while helping to calm the state's
chaotic electricity markets.

 The proposed settlement, outlined in documents prepared in March
by Duke's lawyers, calls for an end to various state
investigations, private lawsuits and state complaints to federal
authorities accusing Duke of overcharging.

 In return, Duke would make an unspecified "appropriate payment"
but admit no wrongdoing.

 "Duke is committed to sharing pain" and "expediting high-level
confidential discussions that would embrace the governor's
political and public relations needs," according to the documents,
which were given to The New York Times by someone who wanted the
issue aired publicly.

 Governor Davis acknowledged the secret discussions in an interview
in San Francisco yesterday, and said he hoped to meet with more
generators soon. But he insisted that none of the companies would
escape a substantial payment because, he said, they have penalized
the state with excessive prices.

 "My general approach to the energy companies is that you have
already charged the utilities a 50 percent credit penalty for the
power they were buying from you," Mr. Davis said, so "you're going
to have to have a very substantial reduction" in what the companies
are owed.

 Mr. Davis said Duke had walked in with "a number of demands,"
including an end to state inquiries but that that was not likely to
happen.

 "We're not about to call off the dogs," said the governor, a
Democrat who will seek re-election next year.

 Duke, based in Charlotte, N.C., is a major investor in
California's wholesale electricity market, having spent more than
$1 billion since the state opened its generating plants to outside
operators in 1996.

 It is also near the top of the list of companies accused of
overcharging. Duke has been ordered by federal regulators to
justify or refund $20 million in disputed charges this year, an
amount that is third-highest among federally regulated companies in
the California market.

 By entering secret negotiations with Mr. Davis and being the first
generator to settle, Duke could gain a public-relations advantage,
in much the same way that the Liggett Group donned a white hat by
being the first company to open talks with the state governments in
the tobacco-litigation wars.

 "We've just simply tried to be part of the solution," Richard B.
Priory, Duke's chairman and chief executive, said in an interview,
adding that the company was "offering ideas" and "throwing in
suggestions."

 Publicly, Mr. Davis has disparaged out-of-state electricity
generators before and after he began talking with them privately.
In an interview two weeks ago with The Los Angeles Times, he called
the generators "the biggest snakes on the planet Earth" for their
pricing practices.

 California's electricity costs have risen to about $28 billion
last year from $7 billion in 1999. By some estimates, they could
approach $70 billion this year * $2,000 for every resident. The
state has stepped in to buy power for financially crippled
utilities, including Pacific Gas and Electric, which is now in
bankruptcy court.

 The Davis administration has struck power deals with companies
like Duke in hopes of securing a stable and affordable source of
power. To pay those bills, Mr. Davis is seeking the largest
municipal bond issue in American history, $12 billion, although
some state officials privately estimate that the final amount will
be higher.

 The governor hopes the bond issue will eventually take the state's
taxpayers off the hook. But how those costs are allocated among
ratepayers, utilities and generators, and whether the bond issue
can even succeed, remain unanswered questions. A major impediment
to resolving the electricity crisis, according to state officials,
utility executives and economists, is the secrecy surrounding the
administration's negotiations.

 Several Republicans have sued the Davis administration to learn
the terms of specific contracts entered into by the state. On
Monday, the administration released a 67-page financial analysis,
including its most detailed disclosure about the overall costs of
state electricity contracts. Last week Republicans blocked
legislation that Mr. Davis says he needs to pass the bond issue.
The bill could come up for a vote later this week.

 "The thing that has hindered Governor Davis the most among the
legislative ranks is the demand for secrecy over the negotiations
and the agreements that have been reached," said Senator Joseph L.
Dunn, a Democrat from Santa Ana and the chairman of a select
committee investigating the price spikes.

 Mr. Davis, in the interview, said there were legitimate commercial
reasons for keeping contract terms confidential.

 The political uncertainty has spilled over into the markets, where
the bonds would have to be sold. The state's credit rating, while
still solid, is slipping.

 Already companies that do business with California, like Duke, are
citing the state's creditworthiness as a reason for charging higher
prices in their dealing with the state, though the state has
stepped in as buyer since February.

 The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission recently ordered
generators to justify high prices in California this year or pay
$125 million in refunds. The companies * including Duke, Reliant
Energy, Dynegy Inc. and the Williams Company * deny any wrongdoing
and cite the state's credit situation as one reason for the high
prices.

 Mr. Priory, the Duke chairman, said that resolution of credit
issues would lead his company to drop the so-called "credit
premium" it now charges on power sales. As of March 7, Duke was
owed more than $100 million by the state's power managers,
documents show.

 In its confidential submission to Mr. Davis and his aides, Duke
said it would "forgive an appropriate amount of certain
receivables, or make an appropriate payment based upon a
methodology that fairly represents its share of alleged
overcharges."

 The documents do not give an amount, but Duke's 2000 annual report
shows that its wholesale energy division had written off $110
million for power sales to California that had not been collected.
(Even with that write-off, the unit's profits before taxes doubled
from 1999 to 2000, and quadrupled for the first quarter of this
year.)

 Duke's "preliminary global settlement template" of March 9 goes
on: "Duke is committed to sharing pain with state and others on a
fair and equitable basis, without admitting legal liability,
because Duke has done nothing illegal."

 Duke says that much of its California power was sold last year on
the forward markets, not the more volatile and higher-priced spot
markets. But Mr. Priory also noted in his interview that at least
10 percent was sold for "whatever the market price is."

 On March 23, Duke's lawyer, at the request of Mr. Davis's legal
affairs secretary, forwarded to the governor's office additional
information about pending litigation involving Duke and its power
sales in California. The documents show that a top Duke priority is
the "prompt suspension of state investigations, lowering of
rhetoric and stay of state litigation," as well as the withdrawal
of state-related claims at the federal energy commission.

 Also in March, the operators of the state's power grid told the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission that wholesale electricity
prices in California were more than $6 billion above competitive
prices over the previous 10 months. Duke has questioned the
methodology of that submission and wants the claim withdrawn.

 The inquiries of concern to Duke include those being conducted by
the office of the attorney general, William Lockyer, and the
California Public Utilities Commission.

 Barry P. Goode, the governor's legal affairs secretary, says he
subsequently referred Duke's lawyer to the attorney general's
office. The two state agencies say that their inquiries are
continuing. Sandra Michioku, a spokeswoman for Mr. Lockyer, said,
"Our investigation is ongoing."

 Loretta Lynch, the president of the utility commission, said in a
telephone interview yesterday, "The public utilities commission has
not been involved in any settlement discussions with generators and
our investigations into overcharges and withholding are ongoing and
strong."

 The Duke documents say the company should be given preferential
treatment for its conciliatory stance.

 Other generators said they were not involved in settlement
discussions with Mr. Davis.

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/02/national/02DAVI.html?ex=989822260&ei=1&en=70
3c8bd8125d53df

/-----------------------------------------------------------------\

Visit NYTimes.com for complete access to the
most authoritative news coverage on the Web,
updated throughout the day.

Become a member today! It's free!

http://www.nytimes.com?eta

\-----------------------------------------------------------------/

HOW TO ADVERTISE
---------------------------------
For information on advertising in e-mail newsletters
or other creative advertising opportunities with The
New York Times on the Web, please contact Alyson
Racer at alyson@nytimes.com or visit our online media
kit at http://www.nytimes.com/adinfo

For general information about NYTimes.com, write to
help@nytimes.com.

Copyright 2001 The New York Times Company


vacation!

Phillip M Love
12/15/99 11:06 AM
To: Shannon Carmichael/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia Hakemack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristen J
Hanson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carrie Hollomon/HOU/ECT@ect, Cassandra Moses/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Becky Pitre/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rhonda Robinson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julia
Sengele/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Csikos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric
Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Little/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Today's meeting

I apologize for the short notice.  I am cancelling today's meeting due to the
need to analyze the OA's and the matrix.  Please let me know if you guys will
be available next Wednesday for a meeting(lunch will be provided).  I should
have the info sooner than that, I would just like to keep on our normal day.
Due to the holidays, some people may be out.  Let me know if you are able to
attend that day so that I can order enough lunch.  Thanks.  Sorry again for
the short notice.
PL


thank you

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bike, Anne
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 1:20 PM
To:	Grigsby, Mike; Gossett, Jeffrey C.
Subject:	Booking New Deals

Mike and Jeff:  I would like to review our existing new deal procedures, and outline the additions I have made to our process in light of the error we found last week.

I have attached a spreadsheet that contains the existing procedures used by Risk to check our new deal entry every night.  I agree that the process must be enhanced because it leaves some room for errors because each Risk person is responsible for checking his or her own inputs.  The existing procedures do not have a backstop in place for catching volumetric errors. We will have an additional "check" in place if the traders and the Risk group arrive at the same net new deals positions from independent sources.

The following spreadsheet describes our existing process.  The only addition to the procedures is the last section on Deal Entry.  That section describes the new standardized Notebook and the deals to be entered by Risk.

 << File: NewDeal Procudures.xls >>

The new procedures that are being put into place include the following:

1. All traders will use a standardized notebook for writing up their financial trades;
2. The traders will no longer be entering their own financial deals;
3. The traders will keep an electronic record of the volumes traded through the broker market that will then be consolidated with the EOL trades done.  This net position should tie out to the net position entered into the system by Risk.

Keith Holst has had a similar function in a model that he runs; However, we decided that not only is his model to elaborate and complicated to be disseminated to all of the traders, but also this section has not been working.  I am working with Keith to design a simple process that will serve our needs and can be easily adopted by all Traders and Book Administrators.

I will have the standardized notebooks ready for use by the traders on Tuesday morning.

Please let me know if you have any comments or questions.


Agustin,

I am trying to confirm the counterparty on one of your deals so that it can
be properly assigned in TAGG.  The ticket for the deal in question reads
Barcel Mexico.  However, I spoke recently with Beatrice Reyna who informed me
that you believed the counterparty to be one of the Bimbo companies.  If you
wouldn't mind looking into this and getting back to me with the correct
counterparty name it would be much appreciated.

Thanks,
Susan

Deal Parameters - Costless Collar

Deal Date:       8/24/00
Delivery Point:  Avg (IF-TETCO/STX and PGE)
Time Frame:  9/01/00 - 02/28/2001
Volume:  38,000 MMBTU/month
ENA Sells:  $5.20 Call
ENA Buys:  $4.00 Put


Weren't you working on this issue with Carol before she went on maternity
leave?

----- Forwarded by Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT on 07/31/2000 03:32 PM -----

	Tana Jones
	07/31/2000 02:48 PM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy E
Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT,
David Portz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Marie Heard/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Robbi Rossi/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: Pacific Gas & Electric Company

I need to hear back from anyone whose group may be trading with this
counterparty.  Here's my issue.

We have been negotiating an amendment to the Password Application with this
counterparty.  The absolutely refuse to see a GTC.  I don't know if any of
you are trading gas, crude or power with them, but if you are, do you have a
master, or would the counterparty see a GTC.  I'm trying to figure out what
we have before we talk to them.

Thanks!


Hi Edie,

Can you add these slides to the Texas Gas Plan Presentation for 2001 behind
pg. 10.

Call with questions.

Thanks,

Eric
x3-0977
---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 02/12/2001 04:34 PM
---------------------------

Bruce Sukaly@ENRON
02/12/2001 04:31 PM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Slides

Have Edie attach these to Tom's presentation.


Thanks!  Stewart had already called me this morning about this deal and had
someone in risk change the other two legs.

   Kate Symes                03/09/2001 01:29 PM

To: Sharen Cason/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: NCPA deal #541645

It looks like only leg 4 had firm energy - I changed that to CAISO. Legs 2
and 3 already had CAISO energy, and leg 1 is killed. Is that okay?

Kate

	From:  Sharen Cason                           03/09/2001 07:01 AM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Stewart Rosman/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: NCPA deal #541645

These two legs are entered with NP-15 delivery points with firm energy.  Let
me know if this is correct.

Thanks!


I loved seeing you so much this weekend.  It makes me wonder how I lived
without you.  I am glad that things at work have calmed down and you can
get out more.  I can't wait to see Lilly this Friday night.  I love your
BEAR!  I told David all about her and he said that he would love to run her
while we walk. Have a great day!


Rick

I understand from Ann that you are looking put some subscriptions in place
for European publications to help you  keep abreast of what's going on over
here.  I'm preparing a full list of all the English-speaking trade journals
for your perusal, but in the meantime I thought I'd make a few suggestion of
how we can help you with this task.

1.  In my view, some of the most accurate and insightful coverage comes from
the FT Energy special publications unit.  They cover the whole of Europe
through a number of different titles.  Enron Europe has an online group
subscription to this series so I am arranging for you to receive a password
so you can access this site.  Most of the publications come out twice a month.

2.  My group is responsible for media monitoring in Europe.   The material
comes from a variety of sources and it is quite a challenge to process and
distribute it effectively.   I suggest that we put you on the distribution
list for all material that either specifically mentions Enron or that relates
to regulatory matters in Europe.

3.  We have a number of different PR companies working for us in our markets
around Europe and they generally provide media monitoring as well but this is
not normally translated into English unless there is something significant.
I suggest that we include you in the circulation for those pieces.

 We also cover Japan, Australia and the Middle East from here.

Japan.   I guess Nick O'Day will send material to you direct.  We have a
daily translation service of headlines and significant longer pieces from our
PR agency in Tokyo.
Australia.  I will send you what we get, but things are fairly quiet there at
present.  I know that Mark Schroeder was in dialogue with Paul Quilkey about
the status of Government Affairs but I don't believe the issue was resolved.
I would like to talk to you separately about this issue at some point, if you
have a minute.
Middle East.  I am still trying to get on the circulation list for media
coverage as we effect the transition from John Ambler's group.  I plan to
talk to John about this when he surfaces from handling DPC issues next week.
In my experience, the key publication for this area is MEED - the Middle East
Energy Digest.

4.   I will send you a full list of English-speaking trades and highlight the
ones which I think you will find most useful.   I believe quite a few of them
are now available online.

Please let me know if I can help with anything else and perhaps we can get
together for lunch on your next visit.

Jackie


Hey, I hope you're feeling better.  We are thinking about a happy hour
tomorrow and inviting those girls that Dan met last time he was down here.
Are you doing anything Friday Night?

Paul


Just summarize the proposal again (briefly) and indicate the changes we
agreed to make based on the technical conference and how we believe the
initial filing, as modified to resolve the reasonable concerns raised by
parties, ought to be approved.  I'd also add a short recount on the conoco
and I. Shippers issues and indicate that vague, industry wide market
affiliate issues are not appropriate in this docket and that the fact that
some (not even all) producers have paranoid competitive concerns should not
preclude shippers who would really benefit form these products from gaining
access to them (i.e, summarize CalPine's very helpful comments).  df

Susan Scott
02/08/2001 10:07 AM
To: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum@ENRON, fkelly@gbmdc.com
cc:

Subject: TW Options -- initial comments

I understand that the decision is that we will file brief initial comments in
this proceeding.
I'm happy to take a stab at a first draft, but am not sure where to begin.
If you could list some specific points you think we ought to make, that would
be helpful.  Thanks.


I won't say I'm surprised by your decision, but am saddened.  On the other
hand, you aren't rid of me yet.  I WILL be a force to be reckoned with out
there.  (actually I should say here.  I am in San Diego again today.)

I am on the run, as usual, but will catch up with you.  Just promise me that
Rick will buy us dinner next time I am there.


starting around $600  -- but bear in mind will depend on how far in advance
you end up ticketing
(should do at least 7 day advance, which would be by this Friday!)

From: Jeff Dasovich on 07/16/2001 06:22 PM CDT
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: Flight Options

Thanks so much.  What's the RT fare for SF/Denver?

Best,
Jeff

	Joseph Alamo
	07/16/2001 06:18 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Flight Options

Flight Options

SFO-Denver
Friday, July 27:

One way fare $345 as of today, anyway; all Non-stop flights:

United departs SFO 1:20 PM arrives DEN 4:49 PM
-or-
United departs SFO 2:35 PM arrives DEN 6:00 PM
-or-
United departs SFO 3:35 PM arrives DEN 7:00 PM
-or-
United departs SFO 4:40 PM arrives DEN 8:03 PM

Return Flights all Non-stop:

United departs DEN 6:15 PM arrives SFO 7:45 PM
-or-
United departs DEN 7:15 PM arrives SFO 8:47 PM
-or-
United departs DEN 8:05 PM arrives SFO 9:35 PM

For RT SFO to Boston  [Most RT itins currently approx. $600]
Outbound:  Sunday, Sep 2: (Only Non-stops listed)

United departs SFO 7:00 AM arrives BOS 3:34 PM
-or-
American departs SFO 7:15 AM arrives BOS 3:50 PM
-or-
United departs SFO 8:00 AM arrives BOS 4:45 PM
-or-
United departs SFO 9:00 AM arrives BOS 5:45 PM

Return:  Sunday, Sep 9: (Only Non-stops listed)

United departs BOS 10:45 AM arrives SFO 2:02 PM
-or-
American departs BOS 10:53 AM arrives SFO 4:25 PM
-or-
United departs BOS 12:55 PM arrives SFO 4:10 PM
-or-
American departs BOS 3:00 PM arrives SFO 6:30 PM


I've attached a summary of recently proposed NETA modifications.  The BSC
Panel has recommended the Authority reject Mod P9.  The other mods will be
considered by the BSC Panel for the first time on May 31st, a meeting which
Paul and I will attend.  Proposed mods normally then go through a
consultation and assessment/reporting phase before a decision is made.

Enron has an opinion on three of the mods: P12 (oppose), P15 (support with
modified timing) and P18 (support option 1).  Elexon recommends P15 and P18
be treated as urgent, which means the consultation and decision process will
progress very rapidly.

Regards
Nick


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  ? 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Crude     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/crude28.pdf
Natural Gas     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/ngas28.pdf
Distillate     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hoil28.pdf
Unleaded     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/unlded28.pdf

Feb. WTI/Brent Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/clg-qog.pdf
Feb Heat Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/heatcrack.pdf
Feb Gas Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/gascrack.pdf
Feb Gas/Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hug-hog.pdf
June Gas/Heat Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/HUM-HOM.pdf
March Gas/Heat Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/HUH-HOH.pdf
Feb/May Unlead Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/HUG-HUK.pdf
Feb/July Crude oil Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/CLG-CLN.pdf

Nat Gas Strip Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/StripmatrixNG28.pdf
Nat Gas Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixNG28.pdf

Crude and Products Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixCL28.pdf


FYI. Thought you might be interested.  Perhaps next week we can do
coffee.

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:  Cherry, Brian
> Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 6:43 PM
> To: Andrew Niven; Benjamin Campbell; Dan McLafferty; Dan Thomas; David
> Anderson; Dede Hapner; Dennis Gee; Donald Petersen; Frank Lindh; G
> Jefferson; Geoffrey Bellenger; George Clavier; J Reidenbach; Jerry Miller;
> John Armato; John Clarke; Kevin Ernst; Kirk Johnson; Les Buchner; Les
> Guliasi; Lisa Lieu; Lise Jordan; Mark Huffman; Michael Katz; Neha Patel;
> Patrick Golden; Paul Sivley; Randall Litteneker; Ray Williams; Richard
> Hall; Rodney Boschee; Sandra Burns; Sandy Dickinson; Shaun Halverson;
> Shelly Malekos; Stuart Tartaglia; Todd Arnett; Trista Berkovitz
> Subject: Sempra Gas Transmission OII PHC
>
> Earlier today, a PHC was held in the Sempra Gas Transmission OII
> (I.00-11-002).  ALJ Bushy and Assigned Commissioner Bilas presided over
> the hearing and 40 appearances were entered into the record.  The OII is
> focused on Sempra, SoCalGas, and SDG&E's gas transmission planning
> practices in general and the recent curtailments of gas deliveries in
> SDG&E's service territory.
>
> Parties argued for segmenting the proceeding into two phases: Phase 1,
> which would deal with SDG&E's Rule 14 curtailment priority and is expected
> to be resolved through a settlement in the near term (by January 2001)
> with SDG&E's electric generation customers, and Phase 2, which will deal
> with longer-term issues of reliability and system infrastructure planning
> and development.
>
> As for the Phase 1 issues, Duke, Dynegy and SDG&E are to reply to
> discovery requests by December 15 and present a status report or
> resolution of Rule 14 matters to the ALJ on or before January 19.  In an
> effort at compromise, PG&E NEG (Otay Mesa)  proposed a "Double Pro Rata
> Gas Curtailment" plan for parties to consider.  Under this plan, EG's
> (excepting cogenerators) would be curtailed on a pro rata basis within the
> EG class based upon scheduled EG demand.  This would be classified as a
> Step 1 allocation.  In the event this Step 1 allocation to an individual
> EG is such that it is unable to satisfy its RMR obligations under the gas
> allocated under Step 1 (assuming it has been called upon by the ISO
> pursuant to the terms of the RMR contract),  then an additional quantity
> of gas will be made available to that plant on a pro rata basis from the
> remaining EG plants.  PG&E NEG was the only one to offer a formalized
> proposal and I have copies of the proposal for those who are interested.
>
> The Phase II issues look to be much more contentious and are likely to
> involve significant discovery issues.  The parties pointed out to the ALJ
> that comments filed by SDG&E and SoCalGas on the OII and in
> representations made in the courtroom today failed to include Sempra or
> its pipeline affiliate as a respondent.  They also noted that many of the
> issues they were concerned with dealt specifically with communications
> between Sempra and its affiliates.  The ALJ noted that "good form required
> a respondent to cooperate and appear" . Sempra argued that SDG&E and
> SoCalGas were the only entities owning and operating gas transmission and
> distribution facilities in California,  not the parent or the pipeline
> company.  ALJ Bushy ended this discussion quickly and noted that Sempra
> was a respondent and should enter an appearance and the Sempra attorney
> reluctantly agreed.
>
> More important were the comments of Commissioner Bilas.  Bilas noted that
> the recent gas curtailments in southern California, combined with the
> electricity crisis and high winter gas prices, were creating headaches for
> everyone.  He stated that parties need to come to grips with the dynamic
> political climate and needed to find, "..legitimate economic
> solutions...not let this become a political football".   This certainly
> appears to be consistent with his current thinking as evidenced by his
> caution in moving forward with the southern California Comprehensive
> Settlement as stated in the CSA PD.
>
> Parties are requested to file PHC statements for the second PHC, currently
> scheduled for sometime the week of the January 22.  The PHC statements
> need to include an issue discussion and a proposed schedule.  ALJ Bushy
> ordered discovery to commence immediately.


Molly:  thanks.  I will be out this afternnon and tomorrow.  If you need
anything let me know.  Thanks again.


Please create a duplicate set of documents in my CA Development folder, just
changing the name to CA Energy Development II LLC.  I'll need both sets.

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/08/2001 06:38
PM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
01/08/2001 06:38 PM
To: Lisa Bills/Enron@EnronXGate, Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Roger
Ondreko/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Catherine Clark/Enron@EnronXGate
cc:

Subject: CA Development - revised documents

Here's a set of CA I revised docs.  If these are ok, we will get CA II lined
up as well.

I'm on the road tomorrow, but should be back in the office on Wednesday am.

Kay


Sara:
Sempra Energy Trading Corp. has requested that in lieu of them signing every
single confirm that we send them that they sign periodically a statement that
lists all of the outstanding deals where they acknowledge that they agree to
the terms of such deals.  Do you see any problem with that?
Carol


would you stop lying about the guy, Im not going to hold it against you for staring

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:43 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

i think that you want the male looker to come

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:41 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

just you baby

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:38 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:

Can i bring your male admirer?


Enron has consented to allow the Federal Bureau of Investigation to search the Enron Building and to interview employees regarding allegations of document destruction.  The company encourages all employees to fully cooperate with the FBI.

The company has retained Michael Levy and his law firm Swidler, Berlin, Shereff, Friedman, to advise any employee regarding this matter and to be present with them during any interviews by government investigators.  If you would like to speak with an attorney, please contact Ned Crady of the Legal Department at 3-4558 or contact Michael Levy's office in Washington, D.C. at 202-295-8414 and they will direct you to him here in Houston.


Sure, I'll give Kevin a call and see why there were charges without any services.   cvb

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Geaccone, Tracy
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 9:11 AM
To:	Barnes, Caroline
Subject:	FW: FW: 2002 Plan Assessments as of 10/19/01 for EREC

Can you help me with this?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Michael Anderson/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX@ENRON   On Behalf Of Michael Anderson/HOU/AZURIX@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 7:52 PM
To:	Geaccone, Tracy
Subject:	Re: FW: 2002 Plan Assessments as of 10/19/01 for EREC

Tracy-

I need some help on what this is.  Admittedly, it's only $117k, but we only have 3 employees, and will likely have less next year.  Can we discuss?

Michael

	Tracy Geaccone/ENRON@enronXgate 10/22/01 09:48 AM 	   To: Mary Botello/ENRON@enronXgate, Tod A Lindholm/ENRON@enronXgate, Agatha B Tran/ENRON@enronXgate, Erin Copeland/ENRON@enronXgate, Michael Anderson/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Jim Barnes/ENRON@enronxgate, Valerie Giles/ENRON@enronxgate  cc:   Subject: FW: 2002 Plan Assessments as of 10/19/01 for EREC

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Yparraguirre, Jay
Sent:	Friday, October 19, 2001 10:21 PM
To:	Geaccone, Tracy; Pritt, Deborah; Lambert, Chris
Subject:	2002 Plan Assessments as of 10/19/01 for EREC

Attached is the updated version of the 2002 plan assessments from Enron Net Works (ENW) for your business unit.  We are sending revisions due to several changes, including increases in Corporate and other business unit allocations, and reductions in ENW expenditures.

This intercompany billing invoice now includes pass throughs and capital for your information.  Consistent with 2001, pass through billings (long distance, market data, WAN, etc.) will not be included in the standard assessments ("8xxxxxxx" accounts).  They will be posted directly to direct expenses ("52502000" accounts) at the cost center level.  This pass through number is only a high level place holder and is not intended to replace the dollars already being budgeted for by each cost center owner.

If you have any questions, you can contact Kevin May at x52508 and he will answer any questions or direct you to the correct person.

If you are not the correct person to receive these assessments or if there is someone else that you would like to include in this process, please reply back to me with this information and I will add them to the contact list for future correspondence.

Thanks,

Jay
x53813

 << File: EREC IC 10-19.xls >>


Richard -

Attached is an outline of the involvement we've engaged AA to perform for
each business unit as they go-live onto SAP.  Please remember that ENA is
going live onto SAP's "common design" that has already been reviewed by AA
from a internal controls perspective.  So this attachment outlines those
items outside of "common design" that Wanda and Sally  probably want covered
from an ENA perspective.  As a rule of thumb, this proposed scope equates to
$100k - $150k in fees to AA that is over & above the audit budget.

One word of advice:  Designate a lead within ENA that has the time to stay on
top of the project, schedule meetings with AA, and coordinate their
involvement with the SAP team members, e.g. not Wanda or Sally, but at a
director/manager level at least.  I was the designee for Corp and ensured
that AA kept the project going.  Also, I worked extensively with the Janet
Tran, SAP lead director responsible for bringing Corp up.  Some big benefits:
Kept AA out of SAP's hair when things got rough.
Made sure that the SAP team knew what our goals & objectives were, especially
when we found something that needed fixed before go-live.
Managed that in fact AA provided us a deliverable at the end of the project.

Please review and call if you need other info.  I'd be glad to assist ENA
too.  I assisted Europe (Naomi Connell) and Int'l cos (John Berggren).  They
appreciated having a "co-pilot" and we avoided duplication of effort with
what had already been done for the prior go-lives.  Also, they felt that
value was rec'd for dollars paid to AA for this work.

Terrie


Todd,

I would like to know which companies you have represented me to, and the result.

Please let me know as soon as possible.

I also would like your phone number.

Tom Donohoe
713-853-7151


I agree.  I am almost through it -- and while there are improvements per our suggestions from the first draft -- there are both substantive and format problems -- i.e., it does not read very well in places, aside from substance.  Will fax Amr my comments on the text and leave with DC colleagues as I will be up in the Senate on RTOs this afternoon.

Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ibrahim, Amr
Sent:	Thursday, September 06, 2001 1:39 PM
To:	Steffes, James D.; Vegas, Dennis; Mara, Susan; Dasovich, Jeff; Kaufman, Paul
Cc:	Shelk, John; Shortridge, Pat; Nord, Sue
Subject:	Gine Project-  Briefing book sections DRAFT

Sue, Jim, Jeff, Paul:
In the context of GNIE Project and the papers that shall be put forward to the participants, I am seeking your help in providing comments on paper one in the list below.  I can not recommend it in its current form since it departs from Enron's line of thinking in many places.  There is a tendency to make these papers neutral, but I found it actually going the other direction.

Kindly advise of your point of view.  It is time sensitve, and I appreciate your help

Brgrds

AI

Dennis:

I shall ask for a delay in reference to this paper for 48 hours till I consult with the colleagues above.  Thank you.

AI

-----Original Message-----
From: 	Vegas, Dennis
Sent:	Friday, August 31, 2001 1:19 PM
To:	Ibrahim, Amr; Shortridge, Pat; Shelk, John
Cc:	Robertson, Linda; Shapiro, Richard; Allen, Margaret
Subject:	FW: Briefing book sections DRAFT

Attached as discussed is the second draft of the briefing documents for the Oct event. They have been separated per our request. These are fresh from Intellibridge and we in Houston have not reviewed them as well, but will be doing so over the weekend.

The documents are attached in the order in which we intend them to appear in
the Briefing Book:

1. Brief History of the Western Power Crisis (Western Power Crisis.doc)
2. Western Power Crisis Timeline (timeline.pdf) -- (Please note that on this
timeline, we still need to cite sources for each of the date entries. Their
graphic designer will be able to do this for us on Wednesday of next week).
3. Responses to the Nation's Energy Crunch (energy crunch clean.doc)
4. Federal vs. State Energy Policy Jurisdiction (fedvsstate.doc)
5. The Status of U.S. Electricity Restructuring (progress of states.doc)

If the regulatory and government team could consolidate their feedback, it would be helpful. Once done, we would like to schedule a call for next Thursday at 3:30 pm, since we would like to do it when Intellibridge is in the DC office.
Regards,

 - Western Power Crisis.doc << File: Western Power Crisis.doc >>
 - timeline.pdf << File: timeline.pdf >>
 - energy crunch clean.doc << File: energy crunch clean.doc >>
 - fedvsstate.doc << File: fedvsstate.doc >>
 - progress of states.doc << File: progress of states.doc >>