http://www.consultrci.com

*********************************************************************
Dear Subscriber,

Over the past seven years, I have become acquainted with many of you both
personally and on the phone.

You have provided our strategic and competitive intelligence group with
many interesting requests for information.

Today, our analysts and writers also respond to your requests through our
electronic media.

We feel that this interaction between writer and reader is an important
key to our future success as well as yours.

We have accelerated our response times, answering your questions both
personally
and through Special Reports, Consulting, and SourceBook Weekly.

Please do not hesitate to continue to e-mail us your questions and requests.

Also, click through to SourceBook Weekly and take advantage of our Special
Offer during the month of December.

Sincerely,
Chris Vigil
Director of Client Services

************************************************************************
SourceBook Weekly December 4, 2000 Issue:
http://www.consultrci.com/web/rciweb.nsf/Web+Pages/SBEntrance.html
************************************************************************

===============================================================
SCIENTECH IssueAlert, December 7, 2000
Natural-gas Prices Hit Astonishing Highs; Will Coal and Nuclear Benefit?
By: Will McNamara, Director, Electric Industry Analysis
===============================================================

According to a Dec. 5 report in the Wall Street Journal, natural-gas prices,
which already had been rising all year, shot up 11.4 percent to an all-time
high of $20 per million BTUs on Monday at the New York Mercantile Exchange.
Today, reports are circulating that spot prices at the Southern California
border reached an astounding $41 on Wednesday, breaking the Daily Gas Price
Index's all-time record high of $39. The sharp increases are viewed as
a reaction to cold weather in the Northeast and forecasts of more to come.
Projections continue to indicate that natural-gas customers will see sharp
increases in their heating bills very soon. The current increase has resulted
from a volatile mixture of rising demand and decreased supplies for natural
gas, which has driven up prices by a total of 218.9 percent, or more than
$5, since a year ago. The uncertain future of natural-gas supplies may
be a contributing factor to an unexpected resurgence of interest in coal-fired
and nuclear power.

ANALYSIS: Unfortunately, we are starting to see real evidence of the projected
rise in natural-gas prices, just as temperatures start to take their downward
slope across most of the United States. Two months ago, the Department
of Energy predicted that households using natural gas would see the largest
year-on-year percentage increase in their bills, with prices rising about
40 percent on average. We've actually been seeing the price increase since
June of this year, when natural-gas hit a then-unprecedented mark of $4.686
per million BTUs. At that time, it was a shock to see those kinds of spikes
for natural gas, especially since the energy source is typically used mostly
in the wintertime for heating. Yet, now as we move into the coldest months
of the season, I project that the all-time-highs of $20 to $40 per million
BTUs are something that might become all too common for the near term.

The Wall Street Journal article on the price spikes also reported that
the American Gas Association estimated that, as of Nov. 24, there were
about 2.502 trillion cubic feet of gas in storage. This represented an
11-percent decrease from the five-year average for that date. The United
States is mostly self-reliant when it comes to natural-gas supplies and,
as I've discussed in previous columns, the fact that a reported 60 percent
of federal lands has been placed off limits for natural-gas drilling certainly
adds to the concern about future supplies. The Clinton administration and
environmental groups have been fiercely protective of federal reserve lands
and prohibited drilling for natural gas (or oil) in states like Alaska,
where some 36 trillion cubic feet of gas is known to be locked underground.

Yet, at the same time, substitute forms of power generation, such as coal
and nuclear, have been restricted or downgraded in favor of natural gas,
which has only exacerbated the current demand on supply. EPA standards
have become so pro-natural gas over the last decade that few coal-fired
plants have been built in the last 10-20 years. Certainly, the public
resistance
toward nuclear power has been well documented, which has thwarted any planned
production of a new nuclear plant.

Ironically, it seems to me that we now find ourselves at a crossroads in
this industry that may in fact lead to a resurgence of coal-fired and nuclear
power. Especially in states such as Texas and Oklahoma, which are very
reliant on natural-gas supplies, the current uncertainty about the
availability
of natural gas and reasonable prices poses a major dilemma. Despite the
recent trend of moving away from these two forms of power, I can point
to several developments indicating that the current predicament could create
a forced reliance on these power substitutes.

First, let's look at coal. It's been widely postulated that coal is cheaper
and easier to produce than natural gas, and its supplies are certainly
more abundant. As recently as this year, coal has accounted for about 54
percent of the electricity produced in the United States, although that
majority-hold over power production has come under attack. Emission
requirements
have forced many generators to shut down or minimize the use of their
coal-fired
generating stations. In fact, a group of seven utilities*AEP, Cinergy,
Illinois Power, Southern Indiana Gas & Electric, Southern Company, and
Tampa Electric Company*have been hit with a lawsuit by the EPA, claiming
that they contributed to some of the most severe environmental problems
facing certain parts of the United States. Specifically, the EPA has claimed
that the utilities violated the Clean Air Act with emissions from their
coal-fired power plants.

Currently, while natural-gas prices have soared, coal prices have remained
comparatively low and stable. In addition, clean coal technologies are
being put into place to reduce the amount of particulates released from
coal-fired plants. As a result, many generating companies are hedging their
bets that the rise in natural gas prices will continue by maintaining or
increasing their coal-fired generation. For example, AEP is the nation's
leading consumer of coal. Reportedly, about 67 percent of AEP's electric
generation is made at coal-fired plants. In response to the natural-gas
price spikes, AEP confirmed that it will continue to operate all of its
coal-fired plants at full capacity, despite the ongoing lawsuit from the
EPA.

Proponents of coal are using the so-called "natural gas crisis" as an
opportunity
to argue that electricity from coal can be provided at about half the cost
of other fossil fuels and is less costly and more reliable than intermittent
power sources such as wind and solar. In addition, coal proponents say
that the cost of electricity would double if the United States were to
replace all existing coal-generated power plants with alternative forms
of power.

Nuclear power also could stand to benefit from the comprised supplies and
high prices of natural gas. Following the growing interest among several
European and Asian countries, several U.S. utilities have expressed recent
interest in expanding their nuclear assets. Corbin McNeill, co-head of
Exelon Corp., on Monday stated that new nuclear plants are needed and one
will definitely be built in the next five to 10 years. McNeill also noted
that the question of whether a new nuclear plant was built would depend
on a sustained increase in prices for natural gas, which remains the current
fuel of choice for new power plants. However, he rejected the notion that
building new nuclear plants would require the Energy Department's Yucca
Mountain spent fuel repository to be operational, an event that probably
won't happen until 2010.

Entergy is another example of a company that continues to aggressively
pursue nuclear power and may spark other companies to do the same in response
to high natural-gas prices. In late November, Entergy announced that it
would submit a counteroffer for the Vermont Yankee nuclear plant, which
is already in the midst of being sold to rival buyer AmerGen Energy (the
joint venture between Exelon and British Energy). Entergy, which has been
developing a strong nuclear platform for some time, believes that the
Northeastern
United States offers a strong market potential for nuclear power, and plans
to increase its offer for the Yankee plant and trump AmerGen's standing
offer of $93.8 million.

The next few months, especially as temperatures continue to drop, should
be very telling on two counts. First, will we continue to see the
record-breaking
prices for natural gas? (I say yes). Second, what impact will these price
spikes have on coal and nuclear? I think they should only have a positive
impact on future development of these two forms of power. However, the
question is whether or not new production of coal and nuclear can be put
into place fast enough to minimize the potentially disastrous impact from
the low supplies and resultant rising prices of natural gas. Only time
will have the answer to these questions.
===============================================================
SCIENTECH is pleased to provide you with your free, daily IssueAlert. Let
us know if we can help you with in-depth analyses or any other SCIENTECH
information products. If you would like to refer a colleague to receive
our free, daily IssueAlerts, please reply to this email and include their
full name and email address or register directly at:
http://www.consultrci.com/web/infostore.nsf/Products/IssueAlert
===============================================================
Feedback regarding SCIENTECH's IssueAlert and SourceBook Weekly should
be sent to wmcnamara@scientech.com
===============================================================

*********************************************************************
Reach thousands of utility analysts and decision makers every day. Your
company can schedule a sponsorship of IssueAlert by contacting Nancy Spring
at nspring@scientech.com or (505)244-7613. Advertising opportunities are
also available on our website.
*********************************************************************

SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are compiled based on independent analysis by
SCIENTECH
consultants.  The opinions expressed in SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are not
intended to predict financial performance of companies discussed or to
be the basis for investment decisions of any kind.  SCIENTECH's sole purpose
in publishing its IssueAlerts is to offer an independent perspective regarding
the key events occurring in the energy industry, based on its long-standing
reputation as an expert on energy and telecommunications issues.

Copyright 2000.  SCIENTECH, Inc.

If you do not wish to receive any further IssueAlerts from SCIENTECH, please
reply to this message and type "delete" in the subject line.


greetings! it's the last day of the month, so i ask y'all to please try to
send all of your daily and baseload faxes and e-mails (preferred) to gas
daily as soon as possible, or by the 3 p.m. deadline. if you would like to
start sending your faxes by e-mail, please send them to me at this address:
tcastleman@ftenergy.com. thanks.


Complete order form for new business cards and forward to Morris for approval.
Assigned to: CN=Jeff Arnold/OU=GCO/O=Enron
Updated by: CN=Jeff Arnold/OU=GCO/O=Enron


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 09/27/2000 03:20
PM ---------------------------

John M Singer@ENRON
09/27/2000 08:38 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Oct EOG & PNG

Power Gas Marketing volumes for October:
 EOG = 10,000 Dth/mon
 PNG =  3,000 Dth/mon


Today's IssueAlert Sponsors:

[IMAGE]

Switch Rates, Predictions and Analysis in Retail Energy Foresight.

Rely on Retail Energy Foresight for current and projected switch rates and
thoughtful analysis on restructured energy markets and related issues.
Download FREE trial copies at www.xenergy.com/xensecure.nsf or contact Susan
Weber at 781.273.5700 or via e-mail at sweber@xenergy.com.  Retail Energy
Foresight is a bimonthly publication from XENERGY, a leader in energy
consulting and strategic information since 1975.

www.xenergy.com/xensecure.nsf

Which e-commerce energy provider had over 600,000 customers in nine states at
the end of 2000 and expects to become the largest unregulated  electricity
and gas marketer in the U.S. in the first half of 2001? SCIENTECH'S
E-Commerce InfoGrid provides the answer and gives you much more to stay
informed. Purchase your InfoGrid today at www.scientech.com or contact  Chris
Vigil, toll-free at (888) 972-8676 for more information.
[IMAGE]
The most comprehensive, up-to-date map of the North American Power System by
RDI/FT Energy is now available from SCIENTECH. The Wall Map measures 42" x
72"; the Executive Map Set consists of 18 11" x 17" maps. Visit our website
at www.scientech.com for a detailed description of these valuable maps and
complete ordering instructions.

[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
May 24, 2001

Southern Company: A National Competitor,
or Master of Its Domain?

By Will McNamara
Director, Electric Industry Analysis

[IMAGE]At an annual meeting of shareholders on May 22, Southern Company's
(NYSE: SO) new CEO Allen Franklin said the company will become a dynamic,
growing, "super-regional" energy company that emphasizes customer service and
shareholder value. In addition to maintaining and improving its annual
dividend of $1.34 per share, Franklin disclosed that, moving forward,
Southern Company will implement a new business strategy, which focuses
geographically on serving 10 states in the so-called "super Southeast."
Franklin also noted that the new strategy concentrates on Southern Company's
regulated retail business, which represents 90 percent of the company's
business.

Analysis: Two recent and significant events at Southern Company set the stage
for this pronouncement of a "new" strategy for the energy company based in
Atlanta. The spin-off of its highly successful Mirant Corp. (NYSE: MIR) six
weeks ago and the simultaneous retirement of former CEO Bill Dahlberg (which
led to the appointment of new CEO Franklin) make the timing right for
Southern to re-establish its vision in the industry. However, it seems to me
that there is not much that is new about Southern Company's recently unveiled
business strategy, which primarily focuses on growth within 10 Southeast U.S.
states. In fact, for the last decade Southern has kept its regulated
operations squarely focused on its service territory, put little emphasis on
U.S. expansion and contributed to the Southeast region's general reluctance
to deregulate. Yet now, even as national energy competitors grow larger and
larger, Southern Company's strong local presence and vertical integration
approach may ultimately prove to be the smartest strategy of all.

It was only four years ago, as the first group of deregulated markets began
to operate, that Southern Company billed itself as a "900-pound gorilla,"
implying that its number of customers and generation assets represented a
formidable challenge to any other electric operation in the nation. This was
a view that was shared by most observers. Before consolidation and mergers
and acquisitions began to accelerate, it was generally thought that Southern
Company was the energy operation to beat in terms of scale and market
prominence. However, the energy industry's playing field has changed
dramatically since that time. Now, Southern's stats (32,000 MW of generation,
4 million customers and market capitalization of $15 billion) are trumped or
rivaled by the likes of AEP and Exelon, companies that also span a much wider
operational base than Southern Company.

Granted, Southern Company has not sat around idly over the last four years
and let competitive opportunities pass it by. Mirant Corp. (formerly Southern
Energy) has been quite aggressive on a global and national scale. Yet, this
formerly unregulated subsidiary of Southern Company is now a $13 billion,
stand-alone company that is still riding on the glory of a strong IPO
(current MIR shares are priced at $45 as of May 24 following its October 2000
IPO price of $21). Now, Southern Company proceeds on its own with a strategy
that is in many ways a recycling of what has been a slow growth (but
successful) formula for its regulated operations. The company says it will
focus on its five regulated utilities (Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Gulf
Power, Mississippi Power, and Savannah Electric) and unregulated power
generation and energy products in the "Super Southeast." The focus on
unregulated power generation, through which Southern reportedly plans to add
another 6,000 MW by 2003, most likely refers to subsidiary operations such as
Southern Nuclear and Southern Company Energy Solutions.

Moreover, Southern appears perfectly content to maintain a strong local
presence, gain a healthy dividend on its regional utility operations and hold
uncontested market power throughout its service territory. Who could blame
them? This has been a lucrative business model for the company for some time.
Southern's 1Q 2001 earnings, excluding contributions from Mirant, were $180
million, or 26 cents per share, compared with $151 million, or 23 cents per
share, in 1Q 2000. Further, the company holds an exemplary relationship with
customers (receiving the highest ranking in overall customer satisfaction,
according to a recent study) and local regulatory commissions.

However, this business model should not be referred to as a "new strategy."
Southern Company has always been a "super-regional" operation with its own
profitable niche that remains clearly defined. The difference now-in addition
to expanding from four to 10 states in the same region-is that Southern may
very well be on the right track and positioned to have the last laugh as the
deregulation game continues to unfold.

As noted, one of the consistent criticisms of Southern is that it has
remained too focused on its service territory of the Southeastern United
States and, through this prominence in the region, has prevented other
companies from penetrating Southern's region. (This is a criticism that has
also been leveled at Duke Energy, Southern's neighbor to the north, which has
a lock on the Carolinas.) FERC recently rejected Southern's proposed SeTrans
Gridco (the company's proposal for a regional transmission organization) and
told the energy company not to re-apply until it had explored joining
neighboring utilities in an RTO (such as GridSouth and GridFlorida, which
have already been conditionally approved by FERC). This was a clear message
to Southern that it would not be allowed to operate as its own electric
island. Of course, FERC's policy is that transmission-owning utilities should
"voluntarily" participate in an RTO, but at the same time the commission
would have control over Southern's market power in the region should the
energy company ever want to merge with or acquire another utility.

Ironically, just as Southern has maintained market power in the Southeast, it
has taken advantage of opportunities from deregulation in other states. On
the wholesale side, Mirant is one company that has witnessed a financial
windfall from California. In addition, Southern Company is now moving into
Florida (its first expansion outside of its service area) after receiving
preliminary approval to build a 633-MW natural-gas generation facility in
Orlando.

Further, Southern Company's dominance in the Southeast has often been cited
as one of the causes of the region's general sense of lethargy when it comes
to electric competition. None of the four states in which Southern is
currently active (Alabama, Georgia, Florida and Mississippi) has formally
adopted any sort of restructuring plan. Generally, these states have decided
to take "wait-and-see" approach, although this philosophy actually pre-dated
the California energy crisis. Granted, insufficient transmission lines
leading to the Southeast and the uncertainties about whether or not
regulators will allow the costs associated with transmission construction to
be recovered also have contributed to the lack of competition in the
Southeast. However, regardless of the causal factors, the end result is that
Southern Company holds what is perhaps the largest uncontested market share
in the country.

Consequently, after being criticized and questioned for its rather
conservative and restricted approach, Southern Company now sits on the
sidelines of a growing energy crisis from which it is remarkably immune. As a
growing number of states consider a return to regulation and industry
analysts debate the prudence of deregulating the energy industry at all, the
trend may be returning full circle to a market structure that Southern
Company has consistently exemplified. In hindsight, the business model that
Southern has steadfastly pursued is now hard to criticize, considering the
uncertainty of many other national markets. For instance:

Southern retains a solid customer base that is in little danger of being
penetrated by competitors.
Mirant has successfully spun off as its own stand-alone company with the
ability to attract investors based on its strong capital appreciation.
Southern Company also remains a strong operation with a solid rate-of-return
and dividend for shareholders, attracting its own set of investors.
The company's vertically integrated model has been retained and there have
been no indications that Southern Company faces a supply shortage.
Expansion into other markets such as Florida and California has expanded
Southern's base, while at the same time the company has held on to its market
share in its own region.

For all of these factors, Southern Company may prove to have one of the
smartest strategies across the electric utility market. Southern probably
won't become a national player, as utility operations of comparable size
clearly aspire toward. However, it arguably has never been part of Southern's
strategy to be a national player (beyond what it achieved through Mirant,
when the company was still a subsidiary). Focusing exclusively on the "super
region" of the Southeast appears to be providing a remarkable rate-of-return
for Southern. In closing, the company's strategy reminds me of the tortoise
and the hare story. While other companies have rushed to merge, grow bigger
and expand  across the country, Southern has taken a more methodical
approach, which may also get it across the "finish line" before many other
competitors.

An archive list of previous IssueAlerts is available at
www.scientech.com

Reach thousands of utility analysts and decision makers every day. Your
company can schedule a sponsorship of IssueAlert by contacting Nancy Spring
via e-mail or calling (505)244-7613. Advertising opportunities are also
available on our website.
SCIENTECH is pleased to provide you with your free,  daily IssueAlert. Let us
know if we can help you with  in-depth analyses or any other SCIENTECH
information  products. If you would like to refer a colleague to receive our
free,  daily IssueAlerts, please reply to this email and include  their full
name and email address or register directly on our site.

If you no longer wish to receive this daily email, send a message to
IssueAlert, and include the word "delete" in the subject line.
SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts(SM) are compiled based on the  independent analysis
of SCIENTECH consultants. The opinions expressed in  SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts
are not intended to predict financial performance  of companies discussed, or
to be the basis for investment decisions of any  kind. SCIENTECH's sole
purpose in publishing its IssueAlerts is to offer  an independent perspective
regarding the key events occurring in the  energy industry, based on its
long-standing reputation as an expert on  energy issues.

Copyright 2001. SCIENTECH, Inc. All rights  reserved.


Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 05/22/2001 08:24 AM -----

	"US Publishing" <brice@restructuringtoday.com>
	05/22/2001 10:07 AM
	Please respond to brice

		 To: "RT Reader" <brice@restructuringtoday.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Restructuring Today, Tuesday May 22, 2001

(see attached file:  rt010522.pdf)

Thank you,

Season Hawksley
US Publishing
800-486-8201
202-298-8201
 - rt010522.pdf


Steve Stojic called to let me know that the technical conference in RP01-56
will be held on Jan. 9 at 10:00.  A notice will be issued shortly.


If you are interested in trading.  I can speak with you.

Hunter
34772


Employee Name: Michelle Cash
Report Name:   Houston Cellular 8-11-01
Report Date:   12/13/01
Report ID:     594D37C9ED2111D5B452
Submitted On:  12/13/01

You are only allowed 2 reports with receipts outstanding.  Your expense reports will not be paid until you meet this requirement.


Changes:
Change/addition:  Binky Davidson (assistant to Mark Muller)
New residence phone:  Wade Cline
New residence phone:  Elaine Rodriquez


---------------------- Forwarded by John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron on 05/10/2000
02:01 PM ---------------------------
From: Ted Murphy@ECT on 05/08/2000 12:44 PM
To: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Authorized Traders

Gentlemen (and I use the term loosely!):
Now that you have been duly authorized by the COO and CRO of Enron to have
global risk responsibility, you need to authorize the individual responsible
for each individual commodity group delineated in the Risk Management
Policy.  I took the liberty of making a stab at it for you.  Please review
attachment and let me know if you have  any changes.  If ok, I will forward
to you for your signature and on to Rick Buy to make official.  These
individuals will then be responsible for designating those that can transact
on their behalf.
Any questions, please call me asap.
Ted x3-3324


Please respond to Bestfares.com Hot Deals  Today's Hottest Travel Deals from Bestfares.com!

 EUROPE SUPER SALE AT BIG, BIG, BIG SAVINGS!
If you were hoping that we at Bestfares.com would come up with cheap fares to Europe for summer travel June 17 through September 30, 2001, your wish has come true. Compared to last week's airfares, we've cut some of our European destinations by up to $700 roundtrip. How about Baltimore or Tampa to London for $469 roundtrip, children ages two-11 $353? Last week this airfare was almost $800 roundtrip. This week, you can get from Seattle or Denver to London for $578 roundtrip. Last week, the same fare was almost $1,000 roundtrip. Can you believe how much these airfares have dropped? We also have super specials to Manchester, England from $503 roundtrip. How about Paris, Amsterdam or Brussels from $518 roundtrip? We have fares to Frankfurt, Munich or D?sseldorf or Milan from $574 roundtrip. Don't miss our specials to Copenhagen, Stockholm or Oslo from $597 or our specials to Moscow, Warsaw, Zurich, Rome, Madrid, Barcelona and many, many more. We did say that these fares are not spring fares (they're much, much lower). These fares are prime seats for peak summer travel, June 17 through September 30, 2001. Act fast, these seats are super hot. Visit
http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=58
QUADRUPLE MILES, FREE STOPOVER IN LONDON, BIG SPRING & SUMMER EUROPEAN SAVINGS
Now you can save hundreds of dollars off the standard summer fares to Europe. Families can earn up to quadruple airmiles. You can also receive a free stopover in London and three free hotel nights. Depart June 17 - September 12, 2001 for as low as $598 roundtrip, children two-11 $448 roundtrip. These prices are available for travel to Paris, Amsterdam, Brussels, Dublin, Shannon, Copenhagen, Stockholm, Oslo and many more. Yes all of the above (cheap fares, a free stopover in London, three free hotel nights in London and quadruple airmiles) for as little as $598 for peak summer travel. Take off to Europe by June 16, 2001 and your airfares (including a free stopover in London) to all these European cities start at only $398 roundtrip, children (ages two-11) for $298 roundtrip. This special promotion is also available for the peak summer and early fall season (June 17-October 12, 2001) to Frankfurt, Munich, Hamburg, D?sseldorf, Berlin, Rome, Milan, Madrid, Barcelona, Zurich and more from $658 roundtrip, children two-11 for $494 roundtrip. If you depart by June 16, fares are as low as $458 roundtrip, $344 roundtrip for children two-11. Now you can see more of Europe for less, earn up to quadruple family airmiles, get a free stopover in London and earn three free hotel nights in London. This offer has not been available in the past five years. Now it's yours for the taking. Visit
http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=18167
and if you still don't see what you're looking for, visit
http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=20010
for savings up to $700 off.
TAKE OFF TO CANADA AT BELOW WHOLESALE FARES THROUGH JUNE 14, 2001
Even through we are super-proud of our special reduced airfares to Europe, wait until you see these below wholesale fares to Canada, for travel through June 14, 2001. Many of these discounted fares only require a three- or seven-day advance purchase. How about a last minute jaunt for Memorial Day? Sample airfares to Toronto, Montreal or Ottawa include Pittsburgh at $113; Louisville, Milwaukee, Kansas City, Austin, San Antonio, New Orleans, Greensboro, Raleigh, Charlotte, Jacksonville, Tampa, Orlando, Fort Lauderdale and Miami at $123; Phoenix from $159; San Diego, Los Angeles, San Francisco and Seattle start at $172; and Colorado Springs, Albuquerque or Portland (OR) start at $185. Visit
http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=55
FINAL 10 DAYS: COAST-TO-COAST BETWEEN 58 U.S. CITIES $174 RT THROUGH SEPT. 10, '01
This summer, if you want to fly from Seattle to Fort Lauderdale or San Diego to Providence, you can find airfares from Bestfares.com for as little as $174 roundtrip. Travel is valid through September 10, 2001. Portland (OR) to 34 U.S. cities is $174 roundtrip or Los Angeles coast-to-coast is $174-198 roundtrip. If you want to travel this summer a la cheap, visit
http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=15796
HOTEL RESERVATIONS NETWORK
Need a hotel room? Look no further because HotelDiscounts.com is the place to find great deals at great prices. HotelDiscounts.com provides up to 70 percent off on hotels in major cities worldwide with guaranteed lowest rates. Book online at
http://www.hoteldiscounts.com/cgi-bin/pickcity?SID=NW2&LKF=NW2
FINAL 10 DAYS: OVER 200 U.S. CITIES ON SALE FOR $162 OR LESS THROUGH SEPT. 10, '01
Where in the U.S. can you fly for under $162 roundtrip? Here at Bestfares.com, we have over 200 U.S. city pairs on sale to save you big bucks. How cheap? How about San Diego to Austin or San Antonio for $141 roundtrip with no fuel surcharge? Kansas City to Las Vegas, $125 roundtrip; Nashville or Columbus (OH) to Las Vegas, $161; Los Angeles to Oklahoma City, Columbus (OH), Little Rock, Omaha or Kansas City, $143 or less; New Orleans to Tulsa, San Antonio, Indianapolis, Raleigh or Providence, $143 roundtrip. Now, for the really cheap fares: New Orleans to Kansas City or Hartford, $99 roundtrip or Columbus (OH) to New York City, Boston, Philadelphia or Washington (DC), $89. Remember, these are only a few of the cities that are on sale this week. Check out
http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=16526
YOUR 3RD NIGHT IN LAS VEGAS IS FREE WITH MGM MIRAGE VACATIONS
The third night is a charm with MGM Mirage Vacations. When you book three nights at any of the MGM Mirage resorts in Las Vegas, the third night is free for a limited time. Set up your own winning streak with a trip to glitzy Las Vegas. With MGM Mirage Vacations, you're able to make you airfare and hotel reservations in one convenient and money-saving move. Book now through May 20, 2001, for a stay between June 1 and August 31, 2001. Choose from one of six MGM Mirage renowned properties: Bellagio, Golden Nugget, MGM Grand, The Mirage, New York-New York and Treasure Island. The complimentary night must be between Sunday and Thursday. Blackout dates and some restrictions apply. The promotional offer is only available on air-inclusive vacations to Las Vegas and not valid on group bookings. For reservations and more information, visit
http://www.mgmmiragevacations.com/3rdnight.htm
CHILDREN (AGES 2-17) FLY TO SYDNEY OR AUCKLAND FROM $99 RT
This summer, if you have travel plans for either Auckland or Sydney with children (ages two-17), you could be taking the kids for as little as $99 roundtrip! The adult fares from Los Angeles or San Francisco are $1,198 roundtrip. Combine that with a child's fare of $99 and your total would be only $1,299 or $650 roundtrip per adult and one child. Departures are valid between May 1 and August 31, 2001 with returns by September 30, 2001. Travelers departing from other U.S. cities might pay higher children's fares, the most expensive is from the East Coast where the fare is $524. If you have plans for your family to go to the South Pacific this summer, this is the deal for you. Visit
http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=14455
CARIBBEAN SALE FARES FROM $328 THROUGH SEPT. 30, '01
It doesn't get much better than our warm and sunny, relaxing and restful Caribbean sale. Travel to the Caribbean tropics is always a hot topic, and we have some hot deals for you. Get away to the Caribbean islands for a relaxing spring or summer sojourn. Fares begin at only $328 roundtrip for travel through September 30, 2001. You can save up to 50 percent to a selection of 15 Caribbean cities, including Aruba, Bermuda, Cancun, Grand Cayman, Montego Bay, Nassau and four other Bahamian destinations, St. Croix, St. Maarten, St. Thomas, San Juan, and Santo Domingo. You can depart from over 40 U.S. cities on the East Coast and in the Southeast from just $328 roundtrip. The average published fares usually range from $658 to $798 roundtrip. From the Midwest, fares are only $428 roundtrip and fares are $458 roundtrip from the West Coast. To delight in Caribbean savings, make a break to
http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=647
FINAL 10 DAYS: COSTA RICA FROM $260 RT THROUGH JUNE 30, '01
If you've ever wanted to go to Central America, mainly San Jose, Costa Rica, then this may be your chance. We have departures from 35 U.S. cities to San Jose from as low as $260 roundtrip. Here are some examples: From Miami, $260 roundtrip; from Orlando or Tampa, $316 roundtrip; from Kansas City, New Orleans or Austin, $320 roundtrip and many more. We also have great deals to Mexico including Puerto Vallarta from $196 roundtrip and Los Cabos from $178 roundtrip. To take advantage of these great deals South of the Border, visit
http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=646
BESTFARES.COM IS NOMINATED FOR THE 2001 WEBBY AWARD
We are most honored by our nomination by The International Academy of Digital Arts and Sciences for a 2001 Webby Award for our new, improved site. Hailed as the "Oscars of the Internet," The Webby Awards are an eminent honor for Internet sites. The 5th annual Webby Awards will take place on Wednesday, July 18 in San Francisco. Two honors are presented in each category: The Webby Award and The People's Voice Award. Judges from The International Academy of Digital Arts and Sciences select the nominees for both awards, and the winners of The Webby Awards. The online community determines the winners of The People's Voice Awards. Show your support by visiting http://www.webbyawards.com , clicking on the People's Voice Awards and voting for us. Register with your email address and you will receive a password in your email almost immediately. People's Voice Awards voting runs through July 4.
You are currently subscribed to hotdeals as pkeavey@ect.enron.com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-hotdeals-1606467L@hotdeals.bestfares.com
 Copyright 2001 by Bestfares USA Inc. All rights reserved.


Kim can you also invite Mike Roberts.


Warren,

I shall be very glad to attend the conference.
Please, let me know what is the topic you would like me to address.

Vince Kaminski

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Warren H. Winter  [mailto:warren@epis.com]
Sent:	Monday, May 07, 2001 4:06 PM
To:	vkamins@ect.enron.com
Subject:	Market Forecasting Conference

Hi Vince,

It been awhile since we have spoken, hope all has been going great for
you.

I left a voice message on this conference subject with you.  We want to
invite you to speak at our conference.

Thought you might like to take a look at the preliminary agenda so I am
attaching that to this email.

This is the fourth year of our conference.  It has grown in quality and
attendance each year.  The conference is held at Skamania lodge, which
is about 45 minutes from the Portland airport.

Basically, we expect an attendance of about 70-80 individuals from the
US and Canada.  We get a broad spectrum of attendance both
geographically and functionally.  It is an excellent opportunity for
networking and building knowledge about electric markets.  All of the
presentations are very well attended.

We strive also for a broad spectrum of high quality speakers.  Many have
no relation with EPIS, we simply are looking for the best speakers we
can find.  We have a high respect for you and know that you would
greatly add to the value of our conference.  It has always been a
pleasure to work with you in the past.  For this conference, we would
consult with you to develop a speaking topic that would fit with your
desires and with our program.

As a speaker, your conference fees would be handled by us.  And the
conference fees include all meals except one dinner.  You would handle
the travel and hotel.

We also provide some opportunity for relaxation with a catered
reception/dinner at the Columbia Gorge Interpretive Center, which
overlooks the gorge and is filled with great history and information
about the spectacular gorge, and on the second evening an informal/fun
golf tournament (included in the conference fees) for those who are
interested.

We hope that you would give this your consideration, and we look forward
to hearing from you.

Thanks

Warren

Warren H. Winter
President
EPIS, Inc.
503-722-2023
www.epis.com <http://www.epis.com/>

 - 2001 Skamania v1.doc << File: 2001 Skamania v1.doc >>


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 02/27/2001 10:42
AM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
02/26/2001 06:16 PM
To: Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: CA - Onondaga

I'll get Kathleen to do it, as she has my current favorite form.  Thanks
anyway.

Kay

From: Sheila Tweed@ECT on 02/26/2001 06:03 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Ed B Hearn III/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: CA - Onondaga

The sale of the cash flow interest is a new deal that I am not working on and
I think that the CA that Fred needs is to cover bidders for the purchase of
the cash flow interest.  I will get Ed to prepare the CA if you wish.


here's one with his eyes open.
:-)
mom

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/
 - cam4.jpg


Louise, find attached a memo which has been approved by all appropriate ENA representatives.  I would like to forward this to EES to confirm everyones understanding of what the parties have agreed to. Are you in agreement with this approach ?

Frank


http://www.ble.state.tx.us/current.htm

Paul_Pfeffer@bakerbotts.com on 10/25/99 11:35:22 AM
To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Bar

G-money

Send me that internet address of the site posting the bar results please.
Let the fretting begin.

Paul


If you have not logged onto the PEP system to designate reviewers, or
approve reviewers for those in your organization, please do so today.

 The deadline for completing performance evaluation information is November
17.  The performance review process is critical to year-end evaluations and
bonus, promotion and compensation decisions. This year, as in previous review
periods, the system enables "360 degree" feedback throughout the organization.

 Please take some time today to get the process started.


I have forwarded the Statoil/J.Aron trades down to Bob Klein and Jeff
Sorenson to sign off on the actual deals listed.  I'll keep you posted...


I need a change to be made in the p&l numbers that you report for Canada.
Quarter one needs to be retroactively restated as attached:

This needs to be done so as the Producer Marketing group's income is split
correctly from Trading income.  This change needs to be reflected in all of
the managment p&l summaries.  There will be no change in the current DPR
because all of the YTD and LTD numbers exclude origination.  I can resubmit a
revised DPR for Jan, Feb and Mar if this makes it easier for you.  This
change is necessary because the same person is no longer responsible for both
Origination and Trading in the Calgary office (Lavorato used to be
responsible for both).  I need this done ASAP because the commercial groups
need the managment reports to reflect the correct P&L for PRC purposes.

Please call if you have any questions (403-974-6735)

Kathy


[IMAGE]

May 29, 2001

Can't read this email? Click here
Issue#: e12405

PROVANTAGE Customer: jeff_dasovich@enron.com

To unsubscribe from the?
Original Advantage Click here
(Do Not Reply to this email)

Products that give you the Professional Advantage!

[IMAGE]
New!

Office XP for Windows
By Microsoft

SHIPPING MAY 31, 2001!
Standard Edition
Professional Edition
Developer Edition

The best way to order Microsoft Office XP is through a Microsoft Open
License. Click here.

[IMAGE]
New!

S800 Color BubbleJet Printer
By Canon

Whether you're a professional photographer or simply someone who appreciates
photo-quality output, the S800 Color Bubble Jet Photo Printer is the desktop
...More

??$288.87
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
RT314 DSL & Cable Modem Router
By NETGEAR

NETGEAR's RT314 combination switch and router creates the potent full-duplex
back bone you need to fire up your system. Share data locally or through the
...More

??$113.95
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
New Version!

Delphi v6.0 Professional
By Borland

High productivity development for Windows
Enter new markets and increase your return on investment. Combine Delphi with
Kylix to use ...More

UPGRADE - NEW VERSION!!!!!??$384.28
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
New Version!

PowerBuilder Enterprise v8.0 for Windows
By Sybase

PowerBuilder 8 is the easy-to-use, scalable, and proven rapid application
development environment that provides a cost-effective migration path to
next-generation ...More

??$2463.18
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
New!

RoboInfo Enterprise
By eHelp Corporation

Introducing RoboInfo Enterprise, policies and procedures publishing software
that increases employee productivity while automatically detecting what
employees ...More

??$1586.85
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
eBookMan EBM-900 Multi-Media & Content Player 8MB
By Franklin

Download books to read or listen to audio books - thousands of titles
available now
Large display for a great reading experience
Download and ...More

??$129.99
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
DocuPrint M750 Color Inkjet 1200x1200dpi
By Xerox/Tektronix

Key Features and Benefits:

Photo-quality Color
True-to-life for business or home applications
Crisp laser-like black text ...More

??$93.95
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
OfficeConnect 56K LAN Modem
By U.S. Robotics

Unconstrained by the computer's serial port, the OfficeConnect 56K LAN modem
uses a 3Com Ethernet interface and data compression to reduce transfer time
...More

??$184.95
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
CanoScan D660U Flatbed Scanner
By Canon

Lift the cover, insert your slide or negative and press the external film
scan button. The D660U scanner, with its built-in backlight, produces
spectacular ...More

??$121.95
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
Cakewalk Home Studio 9
By Cakewalk Music Software

Cakewalk Home Studio is the fastest, easiest, and most afforable way to
create music and sound on a PC.
You can get started fast with online tutorials. ...More

??$73.25
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
ORiNOCO AP-1000 Wireless Access Point
By Lucent Technologies

ORiNOCO AP-1000 Access Point is the wireless access point for the 802.11b
(Wi-Fi) compliant 11 Mbit/s ORiNOCO Enterprise Solution. ORiNOCO AP-1000
extends ...More

??$658.95
[IMAGE]

?
?

Web Address: www.PROVANTAGE.com?
?Toll Free: 800-336-1166???? Fax: 330-494-5260???? email:
sales@provantage.com

Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | FREE Catalog

,2001 PROVANTAGE Corporation, 7249 Whipple Ave. NW, North Canton, OH 44720

Products, prices, terms, conditions, or offers may change at any time.
Company and/or product names are generally trademarks, or registered
trademarks of their respective companies. Some promotional text may be
copyrighted by the product's manufacturer.?

 The Original Advantage promotional email is delivered only to customers of
PROVANTAGE Corporation. PROVANTAGE customers have purchased products in the
past and submitted their email address as part of the checkout process. Or,
customers have entered their name in the "Add to Email List" box on the
PROVANTAGE.com home page. Any customer may unsubscribe from the list at any
time by going to http://www.provantage.com/unsubscribe.htm. The email address
is permanently removed from additional promotional electronic mailings, and
will not be reactivated unless requested by the customer.??

[IMAGE]

BizRate Customer Certified (GOLD) Site


Pat, as we know, February can be a very difficult month from the standpoint of weather, which affects not only travel to and from the event but also any outside activities during the event.  Do we have any flexibility with respect to the month in which the institute is held?  If it is to be held in February, I would opt to try Houston, New Orleans, or Santa Fe. I suggest that, if possible, we avoid scheduling the conference on Valentines Day or any holiday.  All the best.  Jim Derrick

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"David B. Winn" <dwinn@swlegal.org>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22David+20B+2E+20Winn+22+20+3Cdwinn+40swlegal+2Eorg+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Monday, April 02, 2001 3:55 PM
To:	IOGEC Advisory Board \(E-mail\)
Subject:	Location of the 2002 Institute on Oil & Gas Law & Taxation -- February, 2002

TO:	Advisory Board of the International Oil and Gas Educational Center

FROM:	Pat Martin, Chair

RE:  	Location of the 2002 Institute on Oil & Gas Law & Taxation --
February, 2002

As you know, the Institute in San Antonio this year was the first Institute
ever held outside of Dallas.  We are now planning next year's Institute, and
we would appreciate your input -- as a member of the Advisory Board -- on
the best location for 2002.  Please reply to this email (dwinn@swlegal.org)
within the next 2 days with your preference among the following options:

Dallas
Houston
San Antonio
Austin
Oklahoma City
New Orleans
Santa Fe

FYI:  The preferences of the Institute attendees who turned in their
evaluation forms were as follows:

Houston -- 15
San Antonio -- 13
New Orleans -- 13
Santa Fe -- 11
Austin -- 8
Dallas -- 6
Oklahoma City -- 4

Thank you for your reply.  We'll let you know after we've tallied the
results.


Could you please email me the names of the officers of Enrow MW, LLC?

Thanks,

Kay


Yes, that's my sister.  She graduated (undergrad) in 1979 (don't tell her
that I told you, but I think that she was first in her class).  Married to a
very nice guy (Mike Bentivoglio)--also Haas '79.  He's now the head of
corporate planning at Schwab.

Have a great weekend.

Best,
Jeff


That was the discussion late last night
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


*******************************************************

This exclusive offer has been sent to you by TheStreet.com as a
result of a partnership between TheStreet.com and Interactive Week
because you are currently or within the last year have been a
subscriber (either free-trial or paid) to one of our web sites,
www.thestreet.com or www.realmoney.com. If you are not a current
or former subscriber, and you believe you received this message
in error, please forward this message to members@thestreet.com,
or call our customer service department at 1-800-562-9571.

Please be assured that we respect the privacy of you, our subscribers,
and that we have not disclosed your name or any other information
about you to Interactive Week or any other third party.
This email was sent to you by TheStreet.com.

*******************************************************

Interactive Week, the Internet's newspaper, has
a special offer for TheStreet.com subscribers.
A FREE 1-year subscription! That's right, you get
52-issues of the publication that brings the business
and technology worlds together, and it's absolutely FREE.
(Let me be clear, you will not be billed- EVER!)

Interactive Week delivers in-depth news and insight on the
rapidly changing worlds of digital communications and
interactive media.

To apply for your complimentary subscription, simply
go on-line to:

http://www.omeda.com/ziff/iaw/iaw.cgi?&p=ts1

AOL Users Click
Here

We must ask that you confirm before March 12, 2001.
Thank you and welcome.

Sincerely,
James Scottsdale
Director of Professional Relations

P.S.  Should you miss the deadline, you may request a
paid subscription to Interactive Week for $120 per year.
Just call our Customer Service Department at: 1-847-564-9002

*******************************************************

If you would prefer not to receive these types of offers from us
in the future, please click here
http://www.thestreet.com/z/unsubscribe.jhtml?Type=A

To view our privacy policy,
please click here:  http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/about/privacy.html

*******************************************************


Ditto Credit.

	Tana Jones@ECT
	05/07/2001 11:20 AM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marcus
Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Marie Heard/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Robbi Rossi/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jane McBride/AP/Enron@Enron,
Andrea Calo/SA/Enron@Enron, Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL approvals, 05-04-01

----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 05/07/2001 11:20 AM -----

	Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/04/2001 02:52 PM

		 To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/ENRON@enronXgate,
Debbie R Brackett/ENRON@enronXgate, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Cynthia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, Enron Europe
Global CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Claudia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, William S
Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa Lees/ENRON@enronXgate, Juana
Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT,
Karen O'Day/ENRON@enronXgate, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Kelly
Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian Lindsay/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, EOL Call Center@ECT, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Amy
Heffernan/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Molly LaFuze/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Danny Clark/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Teresa
Mandola/ENRON@enronXgate, Bill Kyle/ENRON@enronXgate, Amber Ebow/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Wendi Lebrocq/ENRON@enronXgate
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL approvals, 05-04-01

Attached are EOL approvals for both today and yesterday.

Also, for future reference, please contact Wendi LeBrocq who will be assuming
my duties as the EOL administrator within the Credit Risk Group.  Thanks!


BRUSSELS, Aug. 21, 2001 (paperloop.com) - Sappi has restarted PM 1 at its Stanger mill in South Africa following a rebuild to improve product quality and boost the capacity.  The 61,000 tonne/yr PM's uncoated woodfree capacity is expected to reach 85,000 tonnes/yr by the end of the year.


I really don't remember the name, but it was a man.  He specifically quoted
dollar amounts of $9,475.808.18 vs. $9,298,971.71.  Hope this helps!

Thank you very much1


Hello my darling.  It is great to hear from you.   The photo brought back
memories of a wonderful day with you. You are so beautiful.  I want to kiss
you all over.

Love

Rob


James Scribner is enrolled in Wellhead to Burner Tip

Class Days and Times:
  7/18/2000  08:00:00 AM - 05:00:00 PM
  7/19/2000  08:00:00 AM - 12:00:00 PM
Participant Fee: $600.00

Thank you for your support in providing quality and cost effective
development opportunites at Enron.
Your Company and RC will be charged $600.00

If you have any questions, please call the Development Center Team at
713-853-0357.

Thank you.


Louise

Hope all is well.  You can reach me by phone or email.  Feel free to bug me.

EES Wholesale may make our budget this quarter.

John


Yes, there will be different legal/jurisdictional issues.  I'm going to have
to run this by an attorney familiar w/Japan.  I'll get back to you...

	Jake Staffel@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
	01/05/2001 08:25 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: International NDA

Tana,

I am assembling infomation for an NDA with a company in Japan (Itochu).  Is
there anything special that I need to know about when the NDA is more
international?

Thanks


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 02/02/2001 06:01 PM -----

	Expense Server@Enron_Development
	01/31/2001 03:03 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: <<Concur Expense Document>> - RS012201

The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: Richard Shapiro
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: RS012201
Report Total: $8,299.73
Amount Due Employee: $8,299.73

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur
Expense.
http://nahou-wwxms01p


Stinson,

No problem.

Vince

Stinson Gibner
07/12/2000 11:26 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Giuseppe cell phone

Vince,

Can I loan to Giuseppe my cell phone for the summer?

Stinson

---------------------- Forwarded by Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT on 07/12/2000
11:25 AM ---------------------------
From: Samer Takriti@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS on 06/28/2000 10:49 AM
To: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Bandwidth Trading Feature Set

I will be on the call. I may disconnect around 4:00 to attend the traders'
daily meeting.
A couple of issues:
1. Would it be possible to get Gappy a cell phone for the summer? He does not
have a phone at home. I think the reason for avoiding installing a phone in
his apartment is the increasing cost of his Houston stay.
2. It is getting noisier here. Gappy and I are wandering if we could get
office space downstairs (that we share). We will maintain presence on 44, but
we will be able to discuss when needed.
-Samer


Please find attached the latest draft of the Brattle Group's recommendations
for the Japanese power industry and the accompanying appendices.

You will find changes in emphasis and structure, which make the paper more
convincing, comprehensive and readable. We have tried to include a global
view of market objectives in keeping with your approach in Houston, to give
better explanations of why our recommendations are right for Japan at this
stage and to address potential objections from deregulation's critics in
Japan.

In addition to its earlier content, the new draft:

includes a new section setting up the objectives of a competitive market and
defining a workably competitive market, before making specific
recommendations to achieve those objectives in Japan;

addresses objections by utilities, etc. in Japan to our proposals. Current
opinions or issues circulating in Japan include: California crisis,
discrediting of a tight pool, success of PJM ensured by lack of requirement
to unbundle, nuclear power development;

emphasizes the need for a strong, independent regulator given METI's recent
inability to provide clear rules to support its recommendations and lack of
expertise in the Fair Trade Commission;

de-emphasizes final section on public policy issues to emphasize market
structure, by merging the public policy issues into one section, placing
reliability at the top of the list and providing alternatives to achieve
nuclear policy issues;

proposes implementation timetable in keeping with Japanese review process;

takes a punchier, more urgent approach in the executive summary and the paper
as a whole.

The paper will be published as a Brattle Group paper commissioned by Enron
Japan. Much input has been provided by Enron Japan but the economic arguments
and general approach are in keeping with Brattle's written positions and
standards. The written style of the paper is, of course, theirs.

We would appreciate any comments you might have on the contents of this
paper. Since we will release the paper on 15 May and will create completed
published versions in both English and Japanese by 11 May, please send us any
comments by the end of this week, i.e. Friday, 4 May.

Best regards
Mark Crowther
Public Affairs
Enron Japan


Please post the attached notice immediately.

(Marketers:  in paragraph 8, I've eliminated the min/max language since we're
willing to do a rate over the max.
In paragraph 10, I've changed the tiebreak procedure.)


Our department will be migrated to Outlook in two groups.  The first group
will be migrated on Monday, June 11,  and the second group will be migrated
on Tuesday, June 12.   You will receive four e-mails from the Outlook
migration team.  Please do not delete them.  You will need to open the four
e-mails and follow the instructions to migrate to Outlook.

Assistants, you will be responsible for scheduling training for yourself and
your assignments.  It is recommended everyone attend a one hour training
class.  Training can be scheduled by contacting Maggie Cruz at extension
3-1816.  (Assistants, please coordinate training with your backup so both of
you are not in training at the same time.)  Outlook migration specialists
will be on the 38th floor to answer questions Tuesday and Wednesday, June 12
and 13.

Listed below is useful information provided to us by the Outlook Migration
team.

E-mail Policies

Users will be restricted to a Mailbox size of 100 MB.

Further mailbox size restrictions are detailed as follows:

Issue Warning at 75 MB - users are automatically sent a warning from the
System Administrator explaining they are near their Mailbox limit.

Prohibit Send at 100 MB - users are prevented from sending e-mail, yet they
can still receive internal and external messages.  Users must reduce the size
of their mailbox by deleting old mail, saving attachments to a local drive,
etc. before they can send e-mail again.

Inbound/Outbound Mail Size Limits - inbound and outbound e-mail messages will
be limited to a size of 10MB.

Deleted Item Retention - users will be able to recover deleted items from
their mailbox as old as 8 days.  Deleted items include e-mail messages,
folders, contacts, calendar entries, tasks, notes, journal entries and
meeting notices.

Archiving - archiving will not be a supported feature of Outlook 2000.

Migration Preparation

Clean Your Mailbox - due to new space limitations on your mailbox, you are
advised to clean your Notes mailbox of old, unneeded messages BEFORE
migration.  If you are at the 100MB limit on the day of migration, you will
not be able to send messages once you are in Outlook.

Limits on Items Migrated  - from the day of your migration, only 30 days of
old mail will be migrated from your mailbox.  This includes mail in your
inbox and other folders.  Calendar items dating back one year from the day of
migration will be migrated (with the exception of repeating appointments).

The following people will be migrated Monday evening, June 11.

Adams, Suzanne
Bushman, Teresa
Cash, Michelle
Clark, Bart
Corbet, Nancy
Daniels, Eddy
Davis, Angela
Dickson, Stacy
Edison, Andy
Elbertson, Janette
FitzGerald, Genia
Flores, Nony
George, Robert H.
Goode, Diane
Guinn, Linda
Haedicke, Mark
Hansen, Leslie
Hearn, Ed
Heinitz, Mary
Hodge, Jeff
Legal Temp 1
Legal Temp 2
Legal Temp 3
Legal Temp 4
Mann, Kay
Maxwell, Matt
McCullough, Travis
Meraz, Claudia
Mellencamp, Lisa
Milligan, Taffy
Moore, Janet H.
Nemec, Gerald
Nettelton, Marcus
Ogden, Mary
Perlingiere, Debra
Portz, David
Sager, Elizabeth
Sanders, Richard
Simmons, Linda
Sol,, Carlos
St. Clair, Carol
Sweet, Twanda
Tweed, Sheila
Van Hooser, Steve
White, Ann Elizabeth
Zucha, Theresa

The following people will be migrated Tuesday evening, June 12.

Aronowitz, Alan
Bailey, Susan
Boyd, Samantha
Braddy, Martha
Bruce, Robert
Bruck, Sarah
Carolan, Dominic
Castillo, Connie
Collins, Harry
Cook, Mary
Crady, Ned
del Vecchio, Peter
Doucette, Margaret
Farrell, Keegan
Ferguson, Samantha
Garcia, Nita
George, Carolyn
Gray, Barbara
Greenberg, Mark
Gresham, Wayne
Haas, Merrill
Heard, Marie
Hendry, Brent
Jones, Tana
Keiser, Holly
Koehler, Anne
Korkmas, Deb
Lauterbach, Elizabeth
Legal Temp 5
Legal Temp 6
Legal Temp 7
Lindeman, Cheryl
Lovelady, Steven
Lyons, Dan
Martinez, Mary Helen
Mayer, Laurie
Murray, Julia Heintz
Nachawati, Majed
Nelson,  Cheryl
Panus, Stephanie
Pinto Leite, Francisco
Rivera, Coralina
Robison, Michael
Rogers, Daniel
Sayre, Frank
Shackleton, Sara
Shanks, Reginald
Spencer, Becky
Stoler, Lou
Taylor, Mark
Viverito, John
Young, Randy

Many thanks for your help in making this a smooth migration to Outlook.

Nony Flores and Janette Elbertson


Here's a first draft of the NRG loi.

Kay


Mark,

I thought you might have a view on this as well.

regards
bruce
---------------------- Forwarded by Bruce Garner/Corp/Enron on 07/22/2000
04:57 AM ---------------------------

David Forster
07/21/2000 08:43 PM
To: Bruce Garner/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lara Fields/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edmund
Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT, Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Amita Gosalia/LON/ECT@ECT, Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: MG

As you know, we are looking at doing the following with MG:

1) Moving the Market Maker Application into EnronOnline - effectively, by
putting the same products on EnronOnline as are currently on Market Maker,
then shutting down Market Maker and putting a hyperlink in to EnronOnline

2) Launching financial metals products on EnronOnline, which would transacted
by MG.

I have some concerns about both of these activities.

(1) Until today, I did not realise that the Market Maker application actually
involves the transaction of an LME contract. In other words, when a customer
buys from MG on the Market Maker app, they are buying LME contracts. We have
taken pains to distinguish between what we do on EnronOnline - which is to
transact on products which might settle against a published price vs.
transacting on the actual exchange contract.  As you know, Exchange contracts
are subject to a different set of regulations and scrutiny than currently
applies to EnronOnline.

(2) Because MG trades Exchange contracts on the floor of the exchange, they
are subject to more stringent regulations than Enron. I am concerned that if
MG is transacting financial products on EnronOnline, that EnronOnline could
come under greater scrutiny by the SFA. Paul: Can you comment on whether or
not this is a risk?  If this is a risk, would it be mitigated by having
another Enron company handle EnronOnline transactions (with sleeving back to
MG), or are we already sunk by virtue of the fact that MG is now in the Enron
family?

Comments from any/all recipients invited . . .

Thanks,

Dave


We will miss you guys on Thanksgiving but hope you all have a safe and happy
holiday. Carrin please give our best to your parents.  Little Jim Tanner,
Corby and I are heading to the deer lease Friday after the A & M "tu" game.
We will be coming through SA late Friday afternoon or early evening. Why
don't you join us for a little male bonding. I'll swing by and pick you up
and bring you home Sunday. If you can pull yourself away from the books we
would love to have you. I won't be back in the office this afternoon so if
you think you might be able to make it give me a call at the house or email
me at Jan' email address. It would be great to spend a little time with you.
Let me know.
Love to all, even you Karen,
                                         Bob-O


Please read the attached memo regarding the significant shift in the
Commission's policy.   The policy sets out new interconnection criteria, but
announces that a pipeline may not deny an interconnection on economic grounds.


See Below
----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 07/23/2000 09:36 AM -----

	Richard B Sanders
	07/23/2000 09:27 AM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Tape Archive

Has any action been taken on this request by Shankman?

	Richard B Sanders
	07/13/2000 12:40 PM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Tape Archive

----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 07/13/2000 12:40 PM -----

	Darren P Adamik
	05/26/2000 10:05 AM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Tape Archive

FYI...

Jeff Shankman and Fred Lagrasta are trying to change Enron's Tape Retention
Policy from four months to forever on a number of individuals in their
group.  Due to the inner workings of our recording system, selective tape
retention is impossible.  It is a all or none type of situation.  Please
review this email and our current Tape Retention Policy and decide what
course of action is needed.  As you know this email is not enough to
permanently stop the company's retention policy.  A new policy would need to
be drafted and signed by John Lavorato and yourself before this could occur.

If you have any questions, please call me at 853-4764

Regards,
Darren Adamik
Mgr.-Trading Technology

---------------------- Forwarded by Darren P Adamik/HOU/ECT on 05/26/2000
09:32 AM ---------------------------

Barbara Lewis
05/26/2000 07:49 AM
To: David A Cummings/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darren P Adamik/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ben
Hill/HOU/ECT@ect
cc:
Subject: Tape Archive

---------------------- Forwarded by Barbara Lewis/HOU/ECT on 05/26/2000 07:45
AM ---------------------------

Barbara Lewis
05/26/2000 07:46 AM
To: Darren P Adamik/HOU/ECT@ECT, David A Cummings/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ben
Hill/HOU/ECT@ect
cc: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fred Lagrasta/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Tape Archive

Per Jeff Shankman-
The attached document reflects the ENA Gas Risk Management & Middle Marketing
Groups.
Everyone who appears on the list has a recorded line.  I am aware that all
tapes are destroyed
after a certain time period; however, it is imperative that these particular
tapes are never destroyed.

Please archive these tapes in a secure location.
If additional information is needed please contact me @ x3-5085.

Many thanks,
Barbara Lewis


Today's complimentary issue of Platts Energy Trader is attached below. If you
have any  questions or would like to subscribe now, call  877-286-8897 or
212-904-2004; e-mail, info@platts.com. Meanwhile, we hope you enjoy today's
issue of Platts Energy Trader.

If you need to download Acrobat Reader to read this file, go to www.adobe.com.

To stop the free trial, hit reply and type "stop trial."

 - et032801.pdf


Funny Cajun humor

>From: "Jennifer Fowler" <Jennifer.Fowler@kaiseral.com>
>To: "Boyd; Megan" <mboyd@coair.com>, "RRaiderMom@aol.com"
><RRaiderMom@aol.com>, "Scott_Crowell@hotmail.com"
><Scott_Crowell@hotmail.com>, "Joyce Collett" <jcollett@ccisd.net>, "Darren
>Withers" <darrenwithers@earthlink.net>
>Subject: FW:
>Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 10:28 -0500
>
>The Audubon Zoo in New Orleans had acquired a
>  very rare species of gorilla named Priscilla.
>  Within a few weeks, she became very horny,
>  and difficult to handle. Upon examination,
>  the park veterinarian determined the problem.
>  The gorilla was in heat. To make matters worse,
>  there were no male gorillas of the species available.
>
>  While reflecting on their problem, the park
>  administrators noticed their best employee, Trosclair,
>  working near her cage.  Trosclair, like most cajuns,
>  often bragged about how he could satisfy any female
>  of ANY species. So, the park administrators thought
>  they might have a solution.
>
>  Trosclair was approached with a proposition. Would he be
>  willing to have sex with the gorilla for $500?  Trosclair
>  scratched his head, looked at Priscilla and said he would
>  have to think about it.  The following day, Trosclair
>  said that he would accept their offer, but only under
>  three conditions.
>
>  "Firse," he said, "I don't not want to haf to kiss er."
>
>  "Second...you must not never tol'  no one 'bout dis."
>
>  The park administration quickly agreed to these
>  conditions, so they asked what was his third
>  condition.
>
>  "Well, da tird ting," said Trosclair, "you gotta give
>  me another week to come up with the $500."

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


Kaye:  can you please print for me?  what am I doing wrong?  Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 10/25/2000 11:56 AM -----

	Taffy Milligan
	10/24/2000 03:00 PM

		 To: Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert
Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron,
Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anne C Koehler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie
Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St
Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kaye Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Taffy
Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Becky Tlucek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carolyn
George/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: REVISED-YEAR END CALENDAR

WHOOPS!

Please advise, at your earliest convenience, of tentative or confirmed plans
for vacation during the holiday season, Nov & Dec.

taffy


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 10/25/2000 07:56
AM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
10/24/2000 06:10 PM
To: Jeffrey Porter/HOU/EES@EES, dscott1@columbiaenergygroup.com, Michael H
Garred/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Victoria Versen/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Nov Capacity

I checked the CGLF and CGAS capacity against Navigator.  Take a look and let
me know what you think.  Also, do you know the demand charges for the CGAS
items highlighted in purple?


TD {font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; font-weight: normal; color: black; }   .myWxTitle {font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; font-weight: bold; color: white; }   .myWxTitle1 {font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; font-weight: bold; color: black; }   .myWxTitle2 {font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; font-weight: bold; color: 003399; }   .drkWxTitle {font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; font-weight: bold; color: black; }   .redWxTitle {font-family:  Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; font-weight: normal; color: red; }   .blueWxTitle {font-family:  Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; font-weight: normal; color: blue; }  	 .smallWxTitle {font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 8pt; font-weight: normal; color: white; }  .smallDrkWxTitle {font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; font-weight: normal; color: black; } 	 .categoryTitle { font-family: Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,Sans Serif; font-size: 10pt; font-weight: bold; color: black; }  .bodyText { font-family: Arial,Helvetica,Sans Serif; font-size: 10pt; color: black; }  .captionText { font-family: Arial,Helvetica,Sans Serif; font-size: 8pt; color: black; }  .sectionTitle { font-family: Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,Sans Serif; font-size: 10pt; font-weight: bold; color: black; }
[IMAGE]
  Doug's weather for 1/30/2002 Update Profile  | Unsubscribe    [IMAGE]  Local Outlook for Houston, TX           5 DAY FORECAST        Hi  Lo  Today  [IMAGE] Cloudy 80?F  66?F  Thu  [IMAGE] Scattered T-Storms 71?F  42?F  Fri  [IMAGE] Mostly Cloudy 59?F  36?F  Sat  [IMAGE] Partly Cloudy 59?F  42?F  Sun  [IMAGE] Mostly Cloudy 62?F  43?F      [IMAGE]              DETAILED FORECAST    Today: Mostly cloudy.  High around 80F. Winds SSE 20 to 25 mph. Tonight: Cloudy skies with sprinkles possible late tonight.  Low around 66F. Winds SSE 10 to 15 mph. Tomorrow: Scattered thunderstorms, especially in the morning.  High near 71F. Winds NW 15 to 20 mph. Chance of precip 70%. Tomorrow night: Mostly cloudy.  Low around 42F. Winds N 10 to 15 mph.          WEATHER HEADLINES   Major winter storm developing  A major winter storm is on the way for much of the Plains and Midwest.  [IMAGE] More details   [IMAGE]      MAPS  Doppler Radar Maps  Other Maps    CURRENT CONDITIONS AND 10 DAY FORECAST  Houston, TX   Austin, TX  Corpus Christi, TX  Dallas, TX        IN THE SPOTLIGHT - Ski Features  The powder is piling up! Introducing ski  on weather.com...   Want to know what the weather is like on your favorite ski slopes?  Is the surface snow powdery, or is it packed?  Want more information on the resort?     Our newly revamped Ski section on weather.com  features detailed local forecasts for ski areas worldwide with trail maps, web cams, and comprehensive resort details.  It also includes our exclusive Ski Comfort Index, that helps you decide where and when will be best for skiing.  Ski by it!  weather.com/ski     HEALTH  Are you a human barometer?  Changes in the weather have long been associated with joint pain, headaches and other health concerns.  weather.com's new Aches and Pains section can help you be prepared.    [IMAGE]   Aches & Pains Features   Air Quality Reports   Personal Allergy Profile    click to enlarge        SITE LINKS   For more information on additional topics choose from the following links:    Home and Garden  School Day  Weather In Your Calendar
 You  are receiving this e-mail because you requested The Weather Channel  to send newsletters and announcements to you at doug.gilbert-smith@enron.com. If you feel that you have received this message in error, or if  you no longer wish to receive these messages, you can unsubscribe   anytime.  If you have any questions or concerns about how we use your personal  information, please read our privacy  policy .  We welcome all feedback from our members, please  send us your comments  or questions.  Copyright (c) 1995-2001, The Weather Channel Enterprises,  Inc.  [IMAGE]


Thank you for your request. You will be notified by email when your request has been processed. You can check the progress of your request by clicking http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000080693&Page=MyReq.


Scott et al---the annual Council of State Governments meeting was held last
week in Quebec City and one of the panel presentations during the week was on
"Global E Commerce:State Roles.

The panel was moderated by the Conference of World Regions (Jmaes Gardner and
Lucy Duncan).  Participants were:

 Rep. Matthew Kisber--Tennesee  (he is also co chair of the NCSL task force
on e commerce)

 Arthur Kerrigan---section chief of e commerce for the European Commission in
Brussels

 David Cliche--Minister for Information Highway/Government of Quebec

 DAvid Hite--CEO of Veronex Technologies

 Todd Finch---President, Netscape/Canada

 Bernard McKay---Vice President, INTUIT

The government folks focused most of their discussions on the need to
continue to be able to collect taxes on sales, but said they were not looking
to increase those taxes--just to be able to make it easy to collect.  Kisber
seemed  to be in the Governor Leavitt camp on e commerce solutions--he
referenced Leavitt's proposals several times.  Cliche made some interesting
statements about Quebec having all of it's government work being done via e
mail by the end of 2001---anybody who wants to do business with the
government will have to do it via e commerce.

THe private sector folks talked about the difficulty in dealing with 50
different state rules and regulations in order to do their business and the
need for uniformity and commonality.  Finch talked about the need for global
governance of the internet rather than local or parochial which will only
inhibit development of e commerce.  He also talked about if and when states
or entities will start thinking about trying to tax information that is
exchanged via e commerce and how this would be counterproductive.  McKay
brought up the concept of government becoming a competitor with the private
sector as e commerce changes the way we do business.

It was a fairly interesting discussion, but no real bombshells.

Scott--Kisber mentioned that there was going to be a meeting of the
COngressional interent taxation committee next week in San Francisco (this is
the Governor Gilmore group).  Are you attending that meeting?


Rose,

I suggest putting [brackets] around commercial operation as the date we can
assign without consent.  As of now commercial operation is not a defined term
(I hope it will become a defined term), so we may want to agree to a
different milestone.

Thanks,

Kay

From: Roseann Engeldorf on 11/27/2000 01:51 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa
Bills/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: GE Assignment Language

I took the Mike Barnas language and added in all the "unreasonable to
withhold consent" language from GenPower, to which I added the "financing
structure" language.

I have attached a red-line, which you will need to "view" rather than
"launch."  Please let me know asap if you think that this will fly with GE,
or if the language needs to be softened at all.

Rose


I am not going with AEP.  So please don't include me in your estimates.

D

From: Dena Pawlowski/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/29/2001 02:47 PM
To: Edward D Gottlob/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elsa Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg
McClendon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Danny Conner/NA/Enron@Enron, Lauri A
Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenny J Soignet/HOU/ECT@ECT, James McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary
A Hanks/HOU/ECT@ECT, Silver Breaux/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sam Garner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathy
Hilliard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lee Pinkston/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sean J Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Earl Tisdale/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hohl/NA/Enron@Enron, Michael C
Winders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian M Riley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael C
Bilberry/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Weissman/HOU/ECT@ECT, JoAnne
Harris/NA/Enron@Enron, Christy Sweeney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg
Brazaitis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lee L Papayoti/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary W
Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael W Morris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve HPL
Schneider/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jack Simunek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nathan L
Hlavaty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ron Green/HPL/Enron@Enron, Gerald Lofton/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Cheryl Marshall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Emma Kam Welsch/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Towles/NA/Enron@ENRON, Karl E Atkins/NA/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Rose/NA/Enron@ENRON, Debbie Boudar/NA/Enron@ENRON, Aric
Archie/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom Shelton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth W Kaase/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Robert Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Handley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Crockett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly L Carriere/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barbara
Sargent/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad Blevins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lal Echterhoff/HOU/ECT@ECT,
James R Haden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Kuehler/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom
Fry/GCO/Enron@Enron, Dick Danes/GCO/Enron@ENRON, Vicente
Sarmiento/GCO/Enron@Enron, Joe Zernicek/GCO/Enron@Enron, J R
Fosdick/GCO/Enron@Enron, Reid Hansen/GCO/Enron@Enron, Calvin
Dodd/GCO/Enron@Enron, Bac Thi Ly/GCO/Enron@Enron, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Irene Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Consemiu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cathy L
Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jackie Morgan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Cheryl Dudley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Veronica I Arriaga/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amelia
Alland/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Walters/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mary M Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Acton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Poorman/NA/Enron@Enron, Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carlos J
Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sabrae Zajac/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Trisha Hughes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jackie Young/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Leslie Robinson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jason Vogler/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen
Lindley/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Anita Luong/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thu T Nguyen/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Cynthia Hakemack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gregg Lenart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Charlene
Richmond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Couvillon/Corp/Enron@Enron, Joanie H
Ngo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rebecca Griffin/NA/Enron@Enron, Nick
Moshou/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Yvette Miroballi/HOU/ECT@ENRON, Karen
Gruesen/HOU/ECT@ENRON, Blanca A Lopez/HOU/ECT@ENRON, Anita
Eisenbrandt/HOU/ECT@ENRON, Jacquelyn Azore/ENRON@enronXgate, Erica
Wright/ENRON@enronXgate, Ana Maria Hernandez/ENRON@enronXgate, Donald P
Reinhardt/HOU/ECT@ENRON, Vance L Taylor/HOU/ECT@ENRON, Susan
Smith/HOU/ECT@ENRON, Susie Orsak/ENRON@enronXgate, Carol
Carter/HOU/ECT@ENRON, Liz Bellamy/NA/Enron@Enron, Melanie
Facundo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Saidia Matthews/NA/Enron@ENRON, Monica
Jackson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dena Pawlowski/ENRON@enronXgate, Katie
Washington/NA/Enron@Enron, Suzanne Garcia/NA/Enron@ENRON, Clem
Cernosek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jane Coleman/ENRON@enronXgate, Adriana
Peterson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Theresa McKinney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Candace L
Bywaters/HOU/ECT@ECT, James I Ducote/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kreg Hall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rosa
Brown/Corp/Enron@Enron, Eugene Peabody/GCO/Enron@Enron, Bob
Camp/GCO/Enron@Enron, Esther Buckley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric H
Mason/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sherlyn Schumack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ruby
Wagoner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Comello/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lisa Hesse/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Juanita Marchand/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark McCoy/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chris
Riegler/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kimberly Vaughn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Geheb/OTS/Enron@Enron, John Peyton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anna Arnold/HPL/Enron@ENRON,
Tess Ray/ENRON@enronXgate, Megan Parker/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bryce
Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jack Peebles/ENRON@enronXgate, Jennifer D
Pattison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joyce Viltz/ENRON@enronXgate, Willie
Brooks/NA/Enron@Enron, Bob Fisher/NA/Enron@Enron, Michael
Olsen/NA/Enron@Enron, Mike Potter/NA/Enron@Enron, Karl Stewart/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Buddy Majorwitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Charles Howard/NA/Enron@ENRON, William D
Cosby/GCO/Enron@Enron, Jack Kemp/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Keith
Tyree/NA/Enron@ENRON, Bud Wolcott/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Travis
Moss/NA/Enron@Enron, Larry White/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cheryl
Jones/HPL/Enron@ENRON
cc: Dena Pawlowski/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject: Parking at 1201 Louisiana

All,

For those of you who have not responded to the prior parking email, please
take a moment in doing do, as I am trying to get a firmed up number for
future parking in our new building @ 1201 Louisiana.  I need to get the name
of the garage that you are currently parking in.  This would include those of
you that ride the bus, participate in the vanpool or park on a surface lot.
Thank you in advance for your cooperation.

Regards,

Dena Pawlowski
ENRON North America
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas 77002
Office:  713-853-5073
Pager:  281-631-1310


Check out the attachment.

Guys - you'll like this.

Julie Weihaupt
Business Development Manager
Trigon-Sheehan, LLC
475 17th Street, Suite 300
Denver, CO  80202
Phone     303-296-9645 ext 239
FAX       303-296-0117
Cell         303-929-9898
E-Mail    jweihaupt@trigon-sheehan.com

        "Trust is the most valuable thing you'll ever earn"


IEP will conduct a press briefing Friday at 10am PDT.

Call in number: ?1-800-374-2393
Pass code: ?Independent Energy Producers

Thanks,
Jean

--
Jean Munoz
McNally Temple Associates, Inc.
916-447-8186
916-447-6326 (fx)


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 08/29/2000 08:40
AM ---------------------------

"Duncan, Allyson" <aduncan@kilstock.com> on 08/29/2000 08:22:12 AM
To: "'Keenan Jeffrey'" <Jeffrey.M.Keenan@enron.com>, "'Mann Kay'"
<Kay.Mann@enron.com>, "'Chapman Tom'" <tom.chapman@enron.com>
cc: "Fine, Jonathan" <JFine@kilstock.com>, "'Mellencamp Lisa'"
<lisa.mellencamp@enron.com>, "'Kroll Heather'" <Heather.Kroll@enron.com>

Subject: Meeting with Public Staff

I talked with Gisele Rankin, attorney for the Public Staff, about tomorrow's
meeting/conference call.  The Public Staff has not completed its review of
the material we filed on Friday, but, as I suggested to you yesterday,
Jeffrey, they will have questions about the PPA with VEPCO, gas supply and
annexation issues, and follow up cost data.  Gisele said they will also have
questions about a recent report regarding Enron's plans to build a 144MW
pure merchant facility in North Carolina to go on line next summer.  If she
thinks of anything else she will let me know.

I expect the following people from the Public Staff to be present:  Gisele
Rankin, attorney; Dennis Nightingale, engineer and head of the Electric
Division; Tom Lam, engineer and member of the Electric Division; Mike Maness
and Elise Cox from Accounting, and Tom Farmer or Calvin Craig from Economic
Research.  In other words, it will be crowded.


I'm a man trapped in a woman's body... not really, this is Jeff Fawcett in
Susan's office.  We're on a conference call with SoCalGas right now talking
about the settlement document.  Would you guys pull-up the attached file,
"Primary Rights 4-12.doc" and look it over, with particular reference to the
section titled, "Scheduling Priority?"  I think we're OK here, but I don't
want to agree to anything that we can't administer on our side of the meter
or that just doesn't make sense.

We're down to the final telecon on this subject, and all changes need to be
sent over to SoCalGas ASAP.  Will you take a quick look and send Susan a note
saying thumbs up or down?  Thanks a bunch.

---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 04/13/2000
05:22 PM ---------------------------

"Cherry, Brian - TPBKC" <BCherry@sempra.com> on 04/13/2000 03:38:15 PM
To: "'Scott, Susan'" <susan.scott@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: FW: SoCalGas Settlement Document - Revision

I've  now added you.
?
-----Original Message-----
From: Sullivan, Glen J.
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2000 12:59 PM
To: Cherry, Brian -  TPBKC; 'Leslie, John'; 'Elsesser, Evie'; 'McCrea,
Keith'; 'Pocta, R. Mark';  'Dasovich, Jeff'; 'Beach, Tom'; 'Burkholder,
John'; 'Amirault, Paul';  'Alexander, Michael'; 'Chancellor, Craig';
'Dingwall, B.'; 'Douglass, Dan@SES';  'Fawcett, Jeff'; 'Porter, Doug';
'Rochman, Michael'; 'Counihan, Rick'; 'Bayless,  David'; 'Day, Mike'; 'Paul,
Joe'; 'Jimison, John'; 'Foss, Robert'; McVay, Nancy  W - TPNWM
Cc: Lorenz, Lad - TPLPL; Nelson, Eric B. - TPEBN; Morrow,  Rick - TP3RMM;
Follett, B. David - TPDBF; Freeman, Kimberly; Hubbard, Lisa J.;  Angeles,
Zenee G. - TPZGA; Schavrien, Lee; Reed, William; Brill, Thomas R.; Van
Lierop, Jan - TP2JXV; Smith, Anne S. - TPASS; Harrigan, James P. - TP1JPH;
Surak, Thomas M. - TP1TMS; Fair, Pam; Sakarias, Wayne P.; Purves, Ralph A.;
Fong, Ed; Whitaker, Sue
Subject: RE: SoCalGas Settlement Document -  Revision

Attached is a new version of the Gas Industry Settlement document for
SoCalGas and SDG&E.? I think that essentially all the terms of the
settlement in principle are now covered in it.
?
In  addition to adding material, we have made some changes in language in the
last  version.? Even these changes may not incorporate all comments I have
received from SoCalGas/SDG&E management.? We have NOT made an attempt  to
respond to all comments received to date in this version.? If no change  has
been made on an issue you commented on, that does not necessarily mean we
agree or disagree with your comment.?
?
Especially for the new material, there has not yet been final review by
SoCalGas and SDG&E management either.
?
Hopefully I have been able to correct a problem with the last electronic
version that cause a lot of the section numbering to go haywire when it was
emailed and then opened and printed, even though it looked fine on my
computer  and printed fine from my computer.? Lots of sections mysteriously
would  renumber themselves as "6.4"
?
I am  also attaching the latest draft of an appendix to be included with the
full  settlement that is a revised version of the "Primary and Secondary
Receipt  Point Access Rights" document that was attached with the Deal Points
in the  April 3 filing.
?
We'll  try to send along some of the other appendices soon.?
?
--  Glen Sullivan
Sempra  Energy Law Dept.; gsullivan@sempra.com.? tel: (619)  699-5162;? fax:
(619) 699-5027
?
?
 - GIR413N.rtf
 - Primary Rights 4-12 .doc


I hope you are talking to Phillip to get you system needs as part of this
project.
---------------------- Forwarded by John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron on 10/08/2000
07:55 PM ---------------------------
Beth Perlman @ ECT   10/06/2000 09:25 AM

To: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Consolidated positions: Issues & To Do list

John,

We are working with the traders and have pushed the responsibility for
building consensus on Phillip Allen.  I just wanted to keep you in the loop.
Any assistance that you can offer is greatly appreciated.

Beth

----- Forwarded by Beth Perlman/HOU/ECT on 10/06/2000 09:22 AM -----

	Richard Burchfield
	10/06/2000 08:59 AM

		 To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Beth Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Consolidated positions: Issues & To Do list

Phillip,
 Below is the issues & to do list as we go forward with documenting the
requirements for consolidated physical/financial positions and transport
trade capture. What we need to focus on is the first bullet in Allan's list;
the need for a single set of requirements. Although the meeting with Keith,
on Wednesday,  was informative the solution of creating a infinitely dynamic
consolidated position screen, will be extremely difficult and time
consuming.  Throughout the meeting on Wednesday, Keith alluded to the
inability to get consensus amongst the traders on the presentation of the
consolidated position, so the solution was to make it so that a trader can
arrange the position screen to their liking (much like Excel). What needs to
happen on Monday from 3 - 5 is a effort to design a desired layout for the
consolidated position screen, this is critical. This does not exclude
building a capability to create a more flexible position presentation for the
future, but in order to create a plan that can be measured we need firm
requirements. Also, to reiterate that the goals of this project is a project
plan on consolidate physical/financial positions and transport trade capture.
The other issues that have been raised will be capture as projects on to
themselves, and will need to be prioritised as efforts outside of this
project.

I have been involved in most of the meetings and the discussions have been
good. I believe there has been good communication between the teams, but now
we need to have focus on the objectives we set out to solve.

Richard
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Burchfield/HOU/ECT on 10/06/2000
08:34 AM ---------------------------

Allan Severude
10/05/2000 06:03 PM
To: Richard Burchfield/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Peggy Alix/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russ Severson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenny Ha/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Consolidated positions: Issues & To Do list

From our initial set of meetings with the traders regarding consolidated
positions, I think we still have the following issues:
We don't have a single point of contact from the trading group.  We've had
three meetings which brought out very different issues from different
traders.  We really need a single point of contact to help drive the trader
requirements and help come to a consensus regarding the requirements.
We're getting hit with a lot of different requests, many of which appear to
be outside the scope of position consolidation.

Things left to do:
I think it may be useful to try to formulate a high level project goal to
make it as clear as possible what we're trying to accomplish with this
project.  It'll help determine which requests fall under the project scope.
Go through the list of requests to determine which are in scope for this
project and which fall out of scope.
For those in scope, work to define relative importance (priority) of each and
work with traders to define the exact requirements of each.
Define the desired lay out of the position manager screen: main view and all
drill downs.
Use the above to formulate a project plan.

Things requested thus far (no particular order):
Inclusion of Sitara physical deals into the TDS position manager and deal
ticker.
Customized rows and columns in the position manager (ad hoc rows/columns that
add up existing position manager rows/columns).
New drill down in the position manager to break out positions by: physical,
transport, swaps, options, ...
Addition of a curve tab to the position manager to show the real-time values
of all curves on which the desk has a position.
Ability to split the current position grid to allow daily positions to be
shown directly above monthly positions.  Each grouped column in the top grid
would be tied to a grouped column in the bottom grid.
Ability to properly show curve shift for float-for-float deals; determine the
appropriate positions to show for each:
Gas Daily for monthly index,
Physical gas for Nymex,
Physical gas for Inside Ferc,
Physical gas for Mid market.
Ability for TDS to pull valuation results based on a TDS flag instead of
using official valuations.
Position and P&L aggregation across all gas desks.
Ability to include the Gas Price book into TDS:
Inclusion of spread options in our systems.  Ability to handle volatility
skew and correlations.
Ability to revalue all options incrementally throughout the trading day.
Approximate delta changes between valuations using instantaneous gamma or a
gamma grid.
Valuation of Gas Daily options.
A new position screen for options (months x strike x delta).  TBD.
Inclusion of positions for exotic options currently managed in spreadsheets.
Ability to isolate the position change due to changed deals in the position
manager.
Ability to view change deal P&L in the TDS deal ticker.  Show new deal terms,
prior deal terms, and net P&L affect of the change.
Eliminate change deals with no economic impact from the TDS deal ticker.
Position drill down in the position manager to isolate the impact of
individual deals on the position total in a grid cell.
Benchmark positions in TDS.
Deployment of TDS in Canada. Currency and volume uom conversions. Implicit
and explicit position break out issues.

-- Allan.

PS: Colleen is setting up a meeting tomorrow to discuss the direction for
transport.  Hopefully we'll know much better where that part stands at that
point.


Toni:  I would like to interview Mike asap.  Thanks.


Hey Bobbi,

Here is a revised nomination sheet for March, and also, I know you'll be shocked, but I sent the contract to the lawyers for approval, so we should get it back shortly!

See ya


Stan,
We had our board meeting last week.  It worked out the way we hoped it
would.  Results:

1.  Our CEO UBP Task Force will continue to work with your new team,
discussing matters such as principles, scope, governance, organization, etc.

2.  Each of our CEO Policy Committees (Energy Services, Supply, and Delivery)
will provide commentary on the principles, scope, governance, organization,
etc.

3.  Progress report to board in September.

I am going to work up a plan for getting much of #2 done before the September
board meeting, so that we can develop some rough proactive overall position
on wholesale before December.  Can't make promises yet.

It would be most helpful to me if I could give concrete examples about new
uniform practices can be a win-win in wholesale markets.  Do you know of any
examples we can use of practices that we really wish we already had?  I'm
sure somebody in GISB has a wish list.  We had such a list when we started
the retail effort,  much of it came from CUBR.  It is useful in helping
people understand what we are talking about.  I can use it as a "for
instance".

Thanks
  -Mike


Attached is the HL&P spreadsheet for January.


The message that you sent was undeliverable to the following:
tacstar@mcm.org (user not found)

Possibly truncated original message follows:

Received: from postmaster.enron.com (outbound5.enron.com [192.152.140.9]) by
mail.mcm.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 15:55:32 -0600
Received: from mailman.enron.com (mailman.enron.com [192.168.189.66]) by
postmaster.enron.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/postmaster-1.00) with ESMTP id VAA22824 for
<tacstar@mcm.org>; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 21:53:53 GMT
From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com
Received: from nahou-msmsw02px.corp.enron.com ([172.28.10.38]) by
mailman.enron.com (8.10.1/8.10.1/corp-1.05) with ESMTP id f1NLrqa09405 for
<tacstar@mcm.org>; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 15:53:52 -0600 (CST)
Received: from ene-mta01.enron.com (unverified) by
nahou-msmsw02px.corp.enron.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with ESMTP
id <Tac1c0a2651e86a4cd1@nahou-msmsw02px.corp.enron.com> for
<tacstar@mcm.org>; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 15:53:51 -0600
Subject: Referred to You By the Greens about Possibly Growing Grapes on My
Property
To: tacstar@mcm.org
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.3  March 21, 2000
Message-ID: <OFC95DD77D.8ED2728C-ON862569FC.0077610E@enron.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 15:53:45 -0600
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on ENE-MTA01/Enron(Release 5.0.6 |December
14, 2000) at 02/23/2001 03:51:24 PM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Greetings Sally:
My name is Jeff Dasovich.  The Greens have been helping me develop 40 acres
of land that I bought just north of Anchor Bay (a couple of miles up the
hill from Highway One, about 1200 ft or so up) and they suggested that I
contact you.

The property is right in the heart of the Banana Belt and my property faces
south, is protected, and a such is very hot and sunny from late spring
through later summer/early fall.  The property has an abundance of water on
it.  Of course, the possibility of evening fog raises some tricky issues,
and I haven't done soil tests.  In short, while I think there are some
challenges, I'm convinced that there is at least the strong possibility
that I could grow grapes--around 10 acres or so.

I'm sure that you're extremely busy, but I'd be very interested in talking