Hi Chris:

What happened to the LIA, GIA, ancillary services, interregional coordination, filing letter, and other filing materials that were to have been part of Friday's review?  I assume they will be part of our discussions/negotiations on Feb. 11-12?  And is the date for the final "package" for RRG et al. review, Feb. 4?

Please let us know, and thanks.

Shelly Richardson, Attorney at Law
P.O. Box 61845
Vancouver, WA  98666-1845
U.S.A.
phone 360.737.2464/fax 360.737.2661
shellyr@pacifier.com <mailto:shellyr@pacifier.com>

----- Original Message -----
From: Christine Elliott <mailto:chrisrtowest@EARTHLINK.NET>
To: RRGA-L@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG <mailto:RRGA-L@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG>
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 3:00 PM
Subject: Notice and Agenda - January 25th Stakeholder Clarification Meeting

Hello, Everyone -

This notice confirms the RTO West clarification/review session this Friday, January 25, 2002, at the Kingstad Conference Center first floor meeting room.  The Kingstad Conference Center is located at 5933 NE Win Sivers Drive, about three miles east of the Portland Airport.  The meeting will begin at 8:30 a.m. PST and end around 2:00 p.m.

The purpose of the meeting is to "walk through" rough draft write-ups of the Scheduling Coordinator Agreement and Paying Agent Agreement.  We will also review draft revisions to the RTO West Bylaws and the draft revised Pricing Proposal.  Final draft revisions to Planning and Market Monitoring will be explained.  Questions and input will be taken on all these proposed documents.

The draft TOA will not be ready for the January 25th meeting.  If there is interest in holding a meeting to present and clarify the TOA, we will discuss options for this meeting with you on Friday.  At the January 25th meeting, we will also provide an update to the schedule for completing filing documents. (So far, RTO RRG days are still scheduled for 2/11 and 2/12/02.)

Preliminary drafts of the Scheduling Coordinator Agreement and Appendix and the Paying Agent Agreements were posted on the RTO West website at <http://www.rtowest.org/Stage2RRG_Upcoming.htm> .  Drafts of the Bylaws and the Pricing Proposal revisions will be posted by tomorrow.  We will send a notice to you when they are available on the website.

The topics that will be covered Friday are:
- Update on Schedule to Complete Filing Documents,
- Draft Scheduling Coordinator Agreement and Appendix,
- Draft Paying Agent Agreement,
- Draft Revisions to Pricing Proposal,
- Draft Revisions to RTO West Bylaws,
- Draft Final Revisions to Planning Proposal,
- Draft Final Revisions to Market Monitoring Proposal.

On behalf of Bud Krogh and the team,
Christine Elliott,
RTO West Coordinating Team
chrisrtowest@earthlink.net <mailto:chrisrtowest@earthlink.net>
503-262-9421


Spoke w/ Skilling re OI "binary" decision. He is willing to enter into the
deal. His rational is that he thinks we will be ok on OWC in the final
analysis. He did  say to reserve for the deal adequately and structure it as
appropriate for the circumstances. He also wanted to know if there is
anything different here than on OWC. I told him that it wasn't significantly
different (both strong underlying businesses with huge event risk attached)

Lets get dash completed and then I will voice mail Jeff w/ specifics and get
his verbal signature.

Rick


Start Date: 4/11/01; HourAhead hour: 8;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041108.txt


Dear MetrixND Users,

Based on the results of our recent user survey regarding what Windows
platforms you are using, we have decided to eliminate testing and support of
MetrixND version 3.0 on Windows 95.  The small fraction of you that are
currently running a Windows 95 environment will need to upgrade to at least
Windows 98 to run MetrixND version 3.0.  RER will still support previous
versions of MetrixND that run on Windows 95, however we encourage all users
to run the most current version.

MetrixND version 3.0 will be tested on the following platforms:

  -Windows 98
  -Windows 2000
  -Windows NT version 4.0 or higher
  -Windows ME
  -Windows XP

If you have any questions, please contact Frank Monforte or me.

Shannon Ashburn
Regional Economic Research, Inc. (RER)
11236 El Camino Real
San Diego, CA  92130-2650
858-481-0081
858-481-7550 - fax
shannon@rer.com


Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 05/25/2000 05:44 PM -----

	Carol St Clair
	04/26/2000 04:41 PM

		 To: Rod Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Deutsche Bank

Rod:
Here are their credit issues:

1. In the cross-default language that want to add language that basically
says that even if a cross-default occurs, unless the Non-Defaulting
determines in good faith that performance by the Defaulting Party of its
obligations under the Master is "endangered", then no cross default is
triggered.

2. In Credit Event Upon Merger we had commented that instaed of the
"materially weaker" standard we wanted to specify that it meant being rated
below BBB- by S&P.  Do you feel strongly about this?  Alos, we usually have
language that says that if an event like merger occurs and the transferee
provides collateral to the other party in an amount that is satisfactory to
such party, then a Credit Event Upon Merger is not triggered.  They did not
want to add this carve-out.  Are you okay with this?

3. They want a separate Event of Default that gets triggered if a MAC (below
BBB-) occurs.  We requested that it be out in the collateral threshold
language.

4. They are saying that for "operational" purposes, they cannot agree to
"netting".

5. They want as a category of Eligible Collateral governmental securities
with a maturity of less than 1 year, valued at 98%.

6. In the CSA, if a dispute occurs with respect to either the calculation of
Exposure or the calculation of the value of any colateral in connection with
a party's request either for the transfer or return of collateral, normally
the following procedures apply:

a. the disputing party notifies the other party of the nature of the dispute
by the close of business on the day following the day that the collateral
request was made.

b. the undisputed amount is transferred to the party making the request

c. the parties attempt to resolve the dispute by the "Resolution Time" and if
a resolution is not reached, a recalculation of the Exposure is made and
market quotations have to be obtained.

We normally say that the Resolution Time is 3 Business Days after the dispute
notice is given.  DB wants to shorten this period to 1 Business Day after the
dispute notice is given which gives the parties less time to resolve the
dispute on their own.  What do you think?

7. If a party holds cash as collateral, we normally say that interest earned
is transferred on the first day of the month.  They want to change first to
last.

Let me know what you think.  I was hoping that some of these you could
resolve with your counterpart at DB.

Carol


David, we need the Oxy positions excluded and will also need the basis positions expressed as a Nymex equivalent number of contracts.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Draper, David
Sent:	Friday, March 22, 2002 1:38 PM
To:	McMichael Jr., Ed; Hewitt, Jess P.; Mills, Scott
Cc:	Dicarlo, Louis; Parks, Joe
Subject:	RE: Retail Gas Book / Business

Attached please find an additional file which shows all the Nymex and basis positions for EES by region by forward month. These need to be evaluated carefully before being used as a basis for hedging due to the changing nature of our portfolios. Call me if you have any questions.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	McMichael Jr., Ed
Sent:	Friday, March 22, 2002 9:07 AM
To:	Hewitt, Jess P.; Mills, Scott; Couch, Greg; Ryder, Patrick; Draper, David
Cc:	Dicarlo, Louis; Parks, Joe; Chilkina, Elena; Hall, Bob M.; Semple, Robert; Miller, Don (Asset Mktg); Leff, Dan
Subject:	FW: Retail Gas Book / Business

To all,
I have asked Louis DiCarlo and Joe Parks to contact you to arrange to meet today to review the positions in the wholesale and retail gas books.

Greg/Pat, please pull the current positions (like you have done before) but for each month from the live, ITM counterparties

Scott/Dave/Jess, please do same for the portion of the retail gas book that is designated for retention (not the OTM positions or positions that have or will be rejected and terminated).  If necessary, consider setting up a separate book for the OTM positions.  Also, if you are not currently doing so, please start marking all retail curves at the locations that we have positions.

Please forward the position information to Louis, Joe and Elena Chilkina as soon as possible, but no later than 12:00 Noon today.  If you have issues, please let me know.  Otherwise, I want to meet with all of you at 4:00 PM today in ECN 4105 to review the positions and discuss issues.

Thanks,
Ed

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Leff, Dan
Sent:	Thursday, March 21, 2002 7:50 AM
To:	Hewitt, Jess P.; Holmes, Sean A.; Draper, David
Cc:	McMichael Jr., Ed
Subject:	Retail Gas Book / Business

Jess, David, Sean & Team

I have asked Ed McMichael to spend some time with you in the next 1-2 days to get better acquainted with the retail gas business.

Thanks for your cooperation

Dan


> Need to know more about the how the markets function, the players, the
> regulators and today's hot topic?
> Then, check-out the cost-effective courses being offered by the Institute
> for Financial Markets. The IFM, established in 1989, is a nonprofit
> foundation and leading educational and information institute serving the
> financial services industry. Programs are directed to market-users,
> journalists, academics, congressional staffers, agency personnel and those
> who develop and implement public policy.
>
>
> Futures and Options Seminar
> Feb. 25 & 26 - Washington DC
> Mar. 18 & 19 - New York City
> This comprehensive two-day training session is ideal for new hires, those
> requiring a more in depth knowledge about futures and options. The seminar
> provides a foundation in the fundamentals of futures and options market
> theory and practice. (The class also is ideal Series 3 candidates seeking
> market knowledge.) This seminar price of $525 includes two text books and
> PassMaster a tutorial software program.
>
>
> An Introduction to Security Futures
> Mar. 20 - New York City
> Apr. 23 - New York City
> It's the new hot topic! Security Futures, once a banned product, will
> begin trading later this year. This half-day course presents an overview
> of security futures and the underlying cash markets including the
> requirements for trading and offering these innovative products. The class
> price is only $225.
> What are security futures? Click here
> http://www.theifm.org/index.cfm?inc=securityFutures/securityFutures.inc.
>
>
> For more information please call  202.223.1528 or visit our web site at
> www.theIFM.org . For program details please click on the following direct
> link  http://www.theifm.org/index.cfm?inc=eventsCalendar.inc . Multiple
> attendees and government discounts are available. Class size is limited to
> promote an interactive and productive learning environment, so please
> respond now to reserve your seat!
>
> Please feel free to forward this email to others who are seeking training
> solutions on these specific topics.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Trish Fosh?e
> Director, Sales and Marketing
> Institute for Financial Markets
> 2001 Pennsylvania Ave. NW | Suite 600
> Washington DC 20006
> Tel: 202.223.1528 x.120
> Fax: 202.296.3184
>
> www.theIFM.org - The FII is now the Institute for Financial Markets. Our
> new name reflects our expanded mission to develop and provide products and
> services for the financial services industry.
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> If you do not wish to receive e-mails from us in the future, you may opt
> out by notifying us via e-mail at optout@futuresindustry.org or by writing
> us at 2001 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W., Suite 600, Washington, DC 20006.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


Attention supervisors and managers!

Would you like to improve your ability to lead and manage your team?  The EWS Development Center would like to invite you to The Managers Level Impact and Influence Program.

Date:                             June 14th and 15th
Time:                             8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. (both days)
Place                             Travis Room 1 at the Double Tree Hotel Down Town
Cost:                            $1,500
Target Audience:          Sr. Specialist and Managers in a supervisory role
CPE credits available

Innovative Leadership is the cornerstone of Enron's ability to motivate and retain the industry's top talent.  The Organizational Development and Learning group would like to invite all Enron managers to participate in a new leadership overview course.

This workshop will offer the tools you'll need to lead and manage others more effectively.  In this course you'll gain knowledge and insight on leadership capabilities and receive resources you can readily apply at work.  This two-day program, involving a maximum of 16 participants, has been specifically built to give Enron managers the information they need to succeed in our work environment.   It is an interactive workshop including individual and group exercises designed to drive home insights and build skills that are relevant to your job.

Topic areas include:
?        What is Leadership?
?        Leadership Credibility
?        Thinking Strategically
?        Managing Change
?        Directing Others
?        Leading Teams
?        Influencing Others

Participants will be asked to complete a short self-assessment before coming to the program.  Additionally, each participant will leave with a detailed action plan and other resources to help manage their group and prepare for the next level of leadership.

To register for this class, log on to InvestInMe at http://www.corptraining.com/index.cfm?company=enron.
If you have any questions, please call 713 853-1816.


FYI:  Peabody Coal Sales is not online, but Peabody COALTRADE, Inc. is.

From: Tana Jones on 02/22/2001 09:41 AM
To: Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Walter Guidroz/NA/Enron@Enron, Tanya
Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Wayne Gresham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie
Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Peabody Coal Sales

Per Wayne Gresham, a lawyer in the coal group, we are having a substantial
payment dispute with the referenced counterparty, and George McClellan, the
business person (and a Managing Director), would like to shut them down
immediately for all trading (which appears to be coal and emissions), offline
and online, until this payment dispute is resolved.


Thanks!!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Osire, Ann
Sent:	Friday, August 24, 2001 3:34 PM
To:	Perlingiere, Debra
Cc:	Osire, Ann
Subject:	IDACORP Energy contact

Debra,

I am sorry I wasn't able to get back to you sooner.  I was in class yesterday and part of today.
Anyhow, the contact for Idacorp is as follows:

Attn:  Michelle I. K. Catherine
IDACORP ENERGY L.P.
350 North Mitchell St.
Boise, ID 83704

Her Telephone # is: (208) 275-8314 and the e-mail address is: MCatherine@idahopower.com.

Let me know if you need anything else.

Ann


When you send out your email list of counterparties can you please identify
the following counterparties whenthey are on the list as the present
particular legal problems:

1.  governmental entities
2.  hedge funds

Much thanks!


se item re bankruptcy bill.

Lisa J. Mellencamp
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith St.
Houston, TX  77002
Tel:  (713) 853-7986
Fax: (713) 646-3393
E-mail:  Lisa.Mellencamp@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT on 09/25/2000 11:38 AM -----

	"David Rosenzweig" <drosenzweig@fulbright.com>
	09/25/2000 11:36 AM

		 To: undisclosed-recipients:;
		 cc:
		 Subject: Fulbright Daily Bankruptcy News

   FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI L.L.P.
 DAILY BANKRUPTCY NEWS

From:  Wm. J. Rochelle, III    Monday, September 25,  2000
   Fulbright - New York

Filings:

 AHT Corp. (Nasdaq:AHTC) filed chapter 11 on Friday in White Plains, New
York, along with a deal to sell its health care "E" commerce business for $15
million in cash and stock to a competitor named BioShield Technologies Inc.
(Nasdaq:BSTI).  AHT listed assets of $2.5 million versus liabilities of $8.4
million.  The deal is slated to pay creditors in full while giving
stockholders ten cents in cash per share plus stock in BioShield.

 The banks called their loan on Signal Apparel Company, Inc. (OTCBB:SIAY),
which responded by filing chapter 11 on Friday somewhere other than Delaware
(New York to be precise).  Signal designs and markets activewear, swimwear
and bodywear and  says it is negotiating DIP financing with the banks.

Bankruptcy reform update:

 It now looks like bankruptcy reform legislation is dead for this term.  On
Friday the President said he would veto a new Republican bill that would have
omitted some of the more controversial items.  Despite the change, the
President's spokesman said that "too many of the bill's provisions . . . will
place unnecessary barriers before those who genuinely need bankruptcy
protection when faced with the most difficult situations life has to offer."

Bankruptcy alternative:

 Maybe eBay will become an alternative to filing chapter 11 in Delaware.
Example: eSeated.com consumed $5 million in initial funding developing a
system for making restaurant reservations online.  Unable to complete another
financing, the company is selling its assets on eBay.  Commenting on the
sale, the company's founder said, "This is the ultimate act of desperation in
a very non-liquid market."

Filing possible:

 The SEC has won the appointment of a receiver for Capital Consultants LLC,
which manages $1 billion in union pension funds.  Capital was allegedly being
run as a Ponzi scheme.

Downgrade:

 In February S&P took investment grade status away from National Health
Investors Inc., a Nashville REIT that invests in assisted living and long
term health care facilities.  S&P downgraded again on Friday, this time
lowering the corporate rating and senior notes by two clicks each to B+.  A
$102 million unsecured revolver matures next month, and giving collateral to
the banks may result in another downgrade.  See F&J Daily Bankr. News of Feb.
24 and May 30.

Updates:

 Pro Air Inc., a "low cost" airline based in Detroit, filed chapter 11 last
week after the FAA grounded its three aircraft for alleged safety
violations.  The airline now admits it could not begin flight operations
again for at least three months.  See F&J Daily Bankr. News of  May 10 and
Sept. 20.

 Safety-Kleen could not convince the court of appeals to allow the company to
continue operating a landfill in South Carolina while suing in federal court
to set aside a state court order directing that the landfill be closed.  The
company contended that the shut down order was in retaliation for filing
chapter 11 in June.  See F&J Daily Bankr. News of  Feb. 8 & 17, March 8, 13,
14, 15, 17 & 28,  April 19 & 28, May 1 & 17, June 6, 12, 15, 20 & 21, July 7,
10, 11, 12 & 17 and Sept. 13.

 In late December the appeals court held that the FCC has exclusive
jurisdiction to regulate the wireless licenses owned by NextWave Telecom
Inc.  Relying on the decision, the FCC canceled NextWave's licenses, and
NextWave immediately turned to the bankruptcy court for help.  The bankruptcy
court quickly ruled that the FCC's action was "self-help repossession by
ambush" and set aside the agency's license terminations.  In May, the FCC won
its appeal in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, which upheld the FCC's
cancellation of the licenses.  NextWave has now filed an appeal to the
Supreme Court.  Unless NextWave wins in the Supreme Court, the company has
virtually nothing left to reorganize.  The press has been saying that a
resale of the licenses could bring the government as much as $10 billion (no
typo) at the next frequency auction now scheduled for December 12.  See F&J
Daily Bankr. News of June 9, 10 & 16, Oct. 22 of 98 and Aug. 2, 12 & 17,
Sept. 1, 21 & 22, Oct. 21, Nov. 29 and Dec. 17, 22 & 27 of 99 and Jan 13,
14, 19 & 27, Feb. 1 & 11 and May 26 of 00.

Sold:

 Aureal Inc. filed chapter 11 this spring in Oakland, Calif., and the
bankruptcy court approved the sale of the company's assets for $32 million to
Creative Technology Ltd.  Aureal developed and marketed audio semiconductor
technologies for the PC and consumer electronics markets.  See F&J Daily
Bankr. News of April 6.

Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P. makes NO WARRANTIES OR REPRESENTATIONS OF ANY
SORT with respect to this report, including any warranties or representations
as to the accuracy or completeness of any of the information, facts, or
opinions contained herein.  By having requested receipt of these reports, the
recipient acknowledges that the receipt of these reports does not constitute
the receipt of legal advice and does not, by itself, establish an
attorney-client relationship.  These reports are provided as a courtesy
solely for the recipient's information and may not be reproduced or
distributed to any third parties without Fulbright's express written
authorization.
 - BKNEWS.wpd


Peoples - expires October 2004
Index risk: Chicago
Basis risk: Chicago, NGPL Mid-continent, Trunkline, Ventura

Sithe - expires December 2014
Index risk
Basis risk: ANR-Southeast, ANR - Southwest, PEPL

Northern Border Transport  Monchy & Ventura to Chicago - expires December 2008
Basis spread risk between Ventura and Chicago

Hunter
x34772


I'm here.  My phone's not working(no signal in the woods), but I'll call you
when I go to Ruston tomorrow afternoon.  Have a good weekend.

Robin


>From: "stanley czajkowski" <sjplus5@hotmail.com>
>To: BJLord2@aol.com, cahemming@hotmail.com, cardiac734@aol.com,
>cardiactech@adelphia.net, cmarsh3892@aol.com, comet91000@worldnet.att.net,
>dianehalpin@AOL.COM, dwestwood@erols.com, emsequalnolife@aol.com,
>found1@earthlink.net, haasdc@borg.com, haasmb@netscape.net,
>jons_stang@yahoo.com, jwalsh@medicorpihn.com, katwilliams@juno.com,
>kidd108@attbi.com, ladybee108@webtv.net, maniac_8@hotmail.com,
>pd4byot@aol.com, pita651@aol.com, ralph.walters@gsa.gov,
>rdavies@twcny.rr.com, s-t-a-k@msn.com, shedrick@erols.com,
>tabrams@gargerassoc.com, tina_leavy@msn.com, Wollimat1@cs.com
>Subject: Fwd: FW: RE: Hug war
>Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2002 21:43:00 -0500
>
>
>THE HUG WAR IS ON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
>>From: DianeHalpin@aol.com
>>To: sjplus5@hotmail.com
>>Subject: Fwd: FW: RE: Hug war
>>Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 16:12:21 EST
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com

_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/24/2000
05:10 PM ---------------------------

Joel Hanley <eprmconf@asiarisk.com.hk> on 02/09/2000 02:10:01 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Australian Energy 2000

Dear Vince,

I hope you are well and that things round at Enron aren't too hectic. It is
my pleasure to invite you to speak at Energy & Power Risk Management
Magazine Conferences' new event, Australian Energy 2000, addressing the
second Industry Briefing - "Learning from US experience: Lessons to be
learned from the restructuring North American markets". I appreciate that
you are speaking a lot for us at the moment (for which I am of course
grateful) but, when researching, yours was a name that came up repeatedly
as someone the market would like to hear from. I am hoping that perhaps you
might need to see Paul Quilkey at some point in July and that we can
provide you with another reason to cross the globe.

Rather like the industry briefing that you are giving at Power 2000 this
year in Houston, this address will be presented to the entire conference
before breaking into their streams.

Australian Energy 2000 will take a focused look at the latest problems
facing energy players, with the two in-depth streams I mentioned above: one
dedicated to energy pricing and trading and the other looking at risk
management and the latest business issues.

This conference will be of the highly technical level that people have come
to expect from EPRM events, and I am very keen to encourage participation
from speakers in modifying the programme to suit the audience and issues at
hand. If you have any suggestions or comments on the programme, please let
me know; any help would be gratefully received.

This event will be thoroughly marketed through both Energy & Power Risk
Management Magazine and our extensive database. It is my aim to attract the
leading market players by providing a first-class programme with top-rated
speakers, making this a highly worthwhile event for the energy industry.

I have attached a copy of the programme for your information.

Unfortunately my schedule for this event is very tight. Please let me know
if you would like to participate by reurn email as it is unlikely that we
can speak on the phone as I am currently based in Hong Kong. If you would
like to send a colleague, then I would be happy to discuss this but it
would be great if you could complete the EPRM grand slam by addressing our
three major annual events on three different continents!

I look forward to hearing from you soon.

Yours sincerely,

Joel Hanley
Producer, EPRM Conferences & Courses

 - AustralianEnergy2000.doc

__________________
EPRM Conferences
Risk Publications
Hong Kong
Tel: 852 2545 2710
Fax: 852 2545 7317
www.riskpublications.com


Wednesday afternoon Febuary 6th, 2002, the Enron building experienced a brief power outage.  The building is powered by one of two Reliant circuits.  Yesterday, while a backup circuit was turned off for nearby construction of the light rail system, the primary circuit failed.  Typically, the backup system would have switch on immediately, but because the backup circuit was off the building's backup generators were activated creating what was perceived by some as smoke.  While there was no fire within the building, many employees quickly evacuated the building through the stairwell.  Given heighten concerns for national security, evacuation was indeed appropriate and we appreciate that employees conducted the evacuation calmly and courteously.

Enron Property & Services Corp


---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 08/03/2000 07:22
AM ---------------------------

Matthew Arnold

08/02/2000 06:46 PM

To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Mcquade/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: wv love story

---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Arnold/HOU/ECT on 08/02/2000
06:44 PM ---------------------------

Jonathon Pielop
07/31/2000 07:55 AM
To: Mo Bawa/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian
O'Rourke/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:


Per the request of Mark Taylor, I am forwarding the attached.
---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 03/06/2000 02:11 PM
---------------------------

Frank L Davis
03/06/2000 02:04 PM
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Tana,

Attached below are the documents you requested.

Frank


Attached are a revised and blacklined copy of the Enron Corp. Guaranty in
favor of SITA.

Stephanie Panus
Sr. Legal Specialist
Enron North America Corp.


Off the top of my head, I belive several California parties did, but let me
check.

From: James D Steffes@ENRON on 03/12/2001 03:29 PM CST
To: Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: FERC Order and DWR

Mary --

Did anyone file for rehearing to "include" LT contracts into the review
process?

Jim

	Mary Hain@ECT
	03/12/2001 01:31 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/Na/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, jklauber@llgm.com@ENRON, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Christian
Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tracy Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: FERC Order and DWR

In the Staff Recommendation on Prospective Market Monitoring and Mitigation,
March 2001, the FERC Staff stated that its proposed mitigation proposal is
designed to apply only to approximately 5% of the market that remains in
real-time and not to the bilateral and forward markets.  In addition, the
December 15 order only established a reporting requirement for sales into the
ISO and PX spot markets exceeding $150/MWh.  Under the order, the refund
potential closes after 60 days of a utility filing its cost justification
unless the FERC issues written notification to the seller that its
transaction is still under review.  Note well that this does not entirely
insulate EPMI concerning long term deals because the FERC's December 15 order
is still pending rehearing and parties can appeal that order once the
Commission rules.

From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 03/12/2001 12:00 PM CST
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, jklauber@llgm.com, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Christian
Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FERC Order and DWR

Quick question to Joe and/or Christian, John and Mary:

I'm assuming that any deal we sign with DWR that falls below the $150/MWH
soft cap is free and clear of the order FERC issued on Friday as well as any
other refund risk associated with FERC's December order.  Is that correct?
Thanks.

Best,
Jeff


Donnie, I prepared this email a couple weeks ago but was unable to send it
because of email problems.  It was in my "save as a draft" folder.

ENA sold EES 5,000 dth a day delivered on Iroq Zone 1.  The price is $3.14.
The total volume is 150,000 for the month.  Patricia is only showing a
purchase in your system of 140,000 for the month.  I think you forgot to put
in some of the buy/sale activity.

My system shows ENA delivered 130,000 to Canajoharie and 5,000 to Tenn-Wright
one day (you though little ol' ENA was taking advantage of you).  For 3 days
we bought the gas back from you and we are showing the buy/sale activity at
Tenn-Wright.  The total buy/sale volume is 15,000.  I think you need to add
another 10,000 to your buy/sale activity.

Let me know if you have any questions.  Buddy


Shelley, Steve and I both are fine with the numbers.  Thanks. Lynn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Scott, Donna
Sent:	Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:56 AM
To:	Corman, Shelley
Cc:	Blair, Lynn; January, Steve; Dietz, Rick; Holmes, Bradley
Subject:	FW:

Shelley,
I have left Steve and Lynn a phone message to review and notify you if there are discrepancies.  Rick and Brad have reviewed.
Donna
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Corman, Shelley
Sent:	Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:42 AM
To:	Scott, Donna
Subject:

 << File: gaslogistics.xls >>


Please see attached draft of Master Agreement for Midwest Energy. (Jeff's
final revisions)

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Attached is a file that list the trader contacts for the utilities and generators for NY as requested.

Rob


thanks, rick buy


I left a message regarding the GTC sent yesterday for this customer.  As we have a signed Master now from them, please reconfirm under this Master.  I have sent the Agreement to Stacey Richardson for handling.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Legal
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
Debra.Perlingiere@enron.com
713-853-7658
713-646-3490 Fax


Attached is PIRA's latest "Electricity Daily Demand Forecast."

If you have any questions regarding the report's content, please contact
Morris Greenberg (email: morris@pira.com) or Victoria Watkins (email:
vwatkins@pira.com), at (212) 686-6808.

Contact Client Services regarding PIRA report distribution and address
changes at (212) 686-6808, email: support@pira.com.

NOTE: Circulation of the "Electricity Daily Demand Forecast" outside a
Client's licensed distribution area is strictly prohibited. Clients that
are unsure of their licensed distribution or require an extension of
their current license should contact their PIRA sales representative, or
email to sales@pira.com.

PIRA Energy Group

 - ed111901.pdf
 - ed111901.xls


I will be on vacation tuesday, March 12  returning on wednesday.

ds


i'm sorry that i forgot to send you the msg in the first place ... good thing your vm light works because mine doesn't!!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Quigley, Dutch
Sent:	Tuesday, February 05, 2002 1:47 PM
To:	Vuittonet, Laura
Subject:	RE: pls check vm from stephanie

i did , thnx

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Vuittonet, Laura
Sent:	Tuesday, February 05, 2002 1:46 PM
To:	Quigley, Dutch
Subject:	pls check vm from stephanie


If you think this is worth pursuing, get in touch with Christie.
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/HOU/EES on 07/25/2000 02:08
PM ---------------------------
From: Christi L Nicolay@ECT on 07/25/2000 01:46 PM
To: James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Idea

AEP, ComEd, Duke and CP&L announced last week that they would be
collaborating on a new version of a net based system better than OASIS.  I
think that Enron should consider joining with these utilities on this.  There
may be substantial Enron upside to such a venture from added information
disclosure and standardization and streamlining for easier use:

On 7/14, FERC issued an Advance NOPR asking for input by 2/15/01 on OASIS
Phase II (the new OASIS proposal).  In particular, FERC states that this new
OASIS should address: (i) communication of critical market information (like
transmission rights); (ii) posting of ATC, TTC, and CBM; and (ii) seams
issues between RTOs (transmission service across multiple RTOs).  FERC says
that the new OASIS should make use of Internet, interactive displays, etc.
FERC also asks for information on dynamic notification (where the OASIS
automatically alerts the customer to changes in ATC, reservations, etc.)
This type of functionality would allow Enron to determine if it wants to stay
in a queue when transmission becomes available (rather than getting kicked
out after the first denial for lack of ATC.)  FERC also wants information on
whether generator-run status should be included on OASIS; electronic
scheduling (which can now be done via etag); and business practices that
should be standardized.
Enron could have significant input to force these utilities to propose a
good, customer friendly system that provides valid and helpful data on ATC,
TTC, and CBM, rather than the total lack of substantive information that is
available today.  (Recall that Enron proposed that CBM use be posted--FERC
has not adopted that idea yet.)
Because these are critical utilities, any system that they propose may be
very likely to be adopted (with some changes).  I think it is better to be in
on the front end.  Enron's participation would also give validity to their
system.
Dan Larcamp told me that he would like more "classes" for his staff from
Enron and that we should give joint classes with AEP because Susan Tomasky
told Dan L. that "AEP has nothing to hide."  This type of venture would allow
AEP one venue to make good on that statement.
Steve K. asked us to pursue the idea that Enron build a computer system.
This may be a good way to have significant input while leveraging these
companies' money and promoting Enron's congestion model ideas, etc.


Shirley,

I might have  already sent it to you with a request to renew.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/03/2001
03:23 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Stephanie E Taylor                           12/28/2000 09:46 AM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject:

Dear Vince,

This is to inform you that your subscription to Power Finance and Risk will
be up for renewal in February.  In the past, such renewals were routed to
Info Central to be paid.  Our department has changed its focus to research.
As a courtesy, we will be happy to process your subscription for the next
year.  Please let me know if you would like to renew and include your Cost
Center and Company Codes with the renewal.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me.
Sincerely,
Stephanie E. Taylor
eSource (formerly Info Central)
713/345-7928


Sheila and Kelly,

I am working with Sara Shackleton for the next few months (on loan from
Andrews & Kurth).  This morning I am sending comments to the above-referenced
Agreement to both Chase H&Q and Thomas Weisel.   Please also note that Sara
sent comments out yesterday to Direct Trading on the Customer Agreement.
Should you have any questions, my extension is 3-9720.

Jason Peters


Dave / Chris:

I wanted to give you both a heads up that the Northwestern (NW) GE 7EA deal
should close today or tomorrow, and advise you of a related earnings
recognition issue.

The deal that we are on the path of closing is consistent with the executed
DASH and works as follows: at the signing of the letter agreement, NW pays
ENA $3 million, with another $5 million paid on July 15 (the Turbine
Deposits). The balance of $40 million is paid by NW at such time as the
assignment of the turbine contract is made to the LLC, and ENA sells the LLC
member interests to NW. The outside date for this to occur, via a notice
provided by NW, is Sept. 1. The $8 million paid by NW, and the obligation to
purchase the member interests is a firm commitment guaranteed by Northwestern
Corp. The only condition to NW's obligation to purchase the member interests
is that ENA effect the assignment of the turbine contract into the LLC. If
ENA does not effect the assignment, then NW would also be entitled to a
return of the $8 million in Turbine Deposits.

This structure is the same we followed for the Intergen deal which closed in
January, except the Intergen deal did not have an extended period between the
date of execution of the letter agreement, and the turbine contract
assignment. In the Intergen deal, ENA did not receive any payments prior to
the assignment and sale of the member interests.

The earnings issue raised by accounting (Herman Manis) is that,
notwithstanding NW's firm commitment to purchase, ENA has two (albeit very
minor) performance obligations. First, ENA has to obtain an Acknowledgement
and Consent from GE prior to or concurrent with exercising its purchase
option with E Next and assigning the turbine contract to the LLC  (we have
had to do this for every turbine transaction). Second, ENA has to perform
under its agreement with E Next in that if there is an event of default prior
to the time we effect the assignment, we theoretically could loose our
purchase option right with E Next and be unable to perform under our
agreement with NW. We have suggested to Herman that both of these items are
perfunctory in nature, and that all income from this transaction should be
recognized upon execution of the letter agreement, We have further stated
that we could obtain a letter from GE solving the first issue, but there is
no solution to the second issue. Herman advised us that to the extent we
receive a letter from GE on the first issue, and can convince Arthur Anderson
that the second item is perfunctory in nature, we could recognize all income
upon execution of the letter agreement (prior to the actual assignment of the
turbine contract to the LLC). He did not think we had a good case relative to
the second issue, and is reluctant to approach Arthur Anderson.

Thus, based on the above, in a worst case we may not be able to recognize any
income form this transaction until Q3. While we think we have a shot at
getting accounting to change their position, we do not think that this
outcome should change our position on the deal as the underlying
profitability is significant. The deal is also consistent with the approved
DASH. We therefore recommend that we proceed with the execution of the letter
agreement, and then decide as to how we should proceed on the income
recognition issue depending on your views regarding income being recognized
in Q2 vs. Q3.

Please advise me if you are OK with us closing on the deal as scheduled, or
if you have any other questions.

Regards,

Ben


Start Date: 10/29/01; HourAhead hour: 24;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001102924.txt

Error retrieving HourAhead price data - process continuing...
---- SC Trades Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 10/29/01
  TRADING_SC: EPPS
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1


Please note that on 10/29, the West Power made approximately $17.7 MM today (prelim), of which $17.8 MM was from Curve Shift.

We made curve shift mostly in Mid-Columbia, $24MM, and ZP-26, $9.7MM, and lost some in SP-15, $15.9MM. Please see the attached file for curve shift by delivery point by year.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Samantha Law
EPMI West Power Risk Management
503.464.7248


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/20/2000 09:00
AM ---------------------------

"Scheib, Jacqueline Pennino" <jscheib@rc.com> on 11/17/2000 10:26:09 PM
To: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>, "Jerry Leitman (E-mail)"
<jleitman@fce.com>, "Ross M. Levine (E-mail)" <rlevine@fce.com>
cc: "Sellay, William" <WSELLAY@RC.com>

Subject:

 <<jgtk01!.DOC>>  <<RED FUELCELL AGR.DOC>>
--------------------------------------------------
Jacqueline Pennino Scheib, Esq.
Robinson & Cole LLP
280 Trumbull Street
Hartford, CT  06103
(p) 860-275-8285
(f) 860-275-8299
jscheib@rc.com

 - jgtk01!.DOC
 - RED FUELCELL AGR.DOC


Start Date: 4/15/01; HourAhead hour: 9;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041509.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 9 / Preferred:  12.00 / Final:  11.98)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/15/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_LUCKY
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL


We have received the executed EEI Master Power Purchase and Sale Agreement
dated 2/2/2001 from the referenced CP.  Copies will be distributed to Legal
and Credit.


Brenda,

Please use the second check as the October payment.  If you have already
tossed it, let me know so I can mail you another.

Phillip


did you call griz??

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Anne MOISAN <Anne.MOISAN@internationalsos.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, October 11, 2001 12:56 PM
To:	'pkeavey@enron.com'; 'annemoisan@hotmail.com'
Subject:	FW: Dinner Friday

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	John HANKAMER
> Sent:	Wednesday, October 10, 2001 2:49 PM
> To:	Anne MOISAN
> Subject:	Dinner Friday
>
> Amedeo's
> 22704 Loop 494
> Kingwood
> 281-359-4451
>
> 7:00 pm Friday
>
> John Hankamer
> International SOS - Houston
> (P) 281-361-0482
> (F) 281-361-0158
>


Just wanted to send a reminder to all of you about the BIG BIRTHDAY BASH on
May 25th.  I sure hope to see all of you there.
-----------------------------------------------
For reference, your link to this Invite is:
http://evite.citysearch.com/r?iid=OTLSJRRUFPVETQSRVOVJ

To see this invite -- and all of your invites -- click to your personal 'My
Evite' page.
http://evite.citysearch.com/tour?file=homepage/startPage/unreg.html&li=egi4

48484848


Mark,

I'm sorry I forgot to copy you on this!

Andrea
---------------------- Forwarded by Andrea Calo/SA/Enron on 12/29/2000
11:24 AM ---------------------------

Andrea Calo
12/28/2000 06:38 PM

To:   Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:  Re: Arcor DASH with 2001 capital comment

Please find attached the latest version of the DASH that was circulated.  I
will send you a separate legal risk memo as soon as I have more information
on the negotiation between the Seller (Arcor) and the Municipality
regarding the exemption of the tax on gas.

Regards,

Andrea
---------------------- Forwarded by Andrea Calo/SA/Enron on 12/28/2000
06:30 PM ---------------------------

Diego Hollweck
12/28/2000 06:28 PM

To:   Andrea Calo/SA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject:  Re: Arcor DASH with 2001 capital comment

---------------------- Forwarded by Diego Hollweck/SA/Enron on 28/12/2000
06:28 PM ---------------------------

Diego Hollweck
19/12/2000 12:07 PM

To:   Michael Tribolet/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:   Jeff Kabel/SA/Enron@Enron, Michael Guerriero/SA/Enron@Enron, Joe
      Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron, Santiago Garcia/NA/Enron@Enron, Mario
      Aguilar Benitez/SA/Enron@Enron, Julian Poole/SA/Enron@Enron
Subject:  Re: Arcor DASH with 2001 capital comment  (Document link: Diego
      Hollweck)

Please, see attached the latest version of the DASH with some (minor) legal
changes. This version will be circulated for signatures.

(See attached file: Arcor Amendment DASH 001219.doc)

Michael Tribolet
18/12/2000 05:45 PM

To:   Jeff Kabel/SA/Enron@Enron
cc:   Michael Guerriero/SA/Enron@Enron, Joe Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron,
      Santiago Garcia/NA/Enron@Enron, Diego Hollweck/SA/Enron@Enron, Mario
      Aguilar Benitez/SA/Enron@Enron, Julian Poole/SA/Enron@Enron,
      diego_hollweck@yahoo.com
Subject:  Arcor DASH with 2001 capital comment  (Document link: Diego
      Hollweck)

 - Arcor Amendment DASH 001219.doc


You have been identified as a person who may have contact with power in California.  Based on our receipt of various subpoenas, we will be preserving your past and future electronic mail.  Please be prudent in the circulation of electronic mail relating to your work and activities.  Thank you.


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 05/31/2001 09:58 AM -----

	Becky Stephens/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/30/2001 03:40 PM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Linda R Guinn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bonnie White/ENRON@enronXgate
		 Subject: service of process  **URGENT ATTENTION REQUIRED**

The following documents, received today, have been forwarded for your
immediate attention:

LAP, LLC d/b/a Comfort Suites v. NEPCO, a Delaware corporation, and Michael
Renfro, an individual; No. CS-2001-02881, In the Fourteenth Judicial District
Court, Tulsa County, Oklahoma.  SUMMONS and PETITION to CT Corp for NEPCO
(National Energy Production Corporation) by certified mail on 5/14/01.  CT
Corp first forwarded the paperwork to Redmond, WA and it was returned to
them.  CT Corp then forwarded the paperwork to Becky Stephens, Enron, Houston
on 5/29/01.
**PLEASE NOTE THE SHORT ANSWER DATE: 20 DAYS FROM 5/14/01.**

PLEASE ADVISE IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE WITHIN 1 BUSINESS DAY.

Thank you !!

Becky A. Stephens
Support Services Coordinator
Enron Litigation Unit, EB4809
713/853-5025
713/853-6576 (fax)
Becky.Stephens@enron.com


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 03/06/2001 03:35 PM -----

	"perfmgmt@enron.com"<perfmgmt
	01/17/2001 02:07 PM

		 To: richard.b.sanders@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Year End 2000 Performance Evaluation Due

Feb 02, 2001

YEAR END 2000 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORMS ARE DUE IN HUMAN RESOURCES BY THE
ABOVE DATE.  FOR EEL, THE DEADLINE IS JANUARY 31, 2001.

If you have not already done so, please begin the process of giving feedback
to your employees.  The evaluation forms used to provide feedback to the
employee can be obtained via the Performance Management System (PEP).

To download the evaluation forms from PEP, please follow the steps below:

1. Log into PEP at http://pep.corp.enron.com .
2. Under Supervisor Services, click Supervisor Evaluation Forms.
3. Right-click on each employee and choose 'Save Target As...' or 'Save Link
As...'
4. Select your own personal directory, choose a file name to save to and
click 'Save'.
5. Repeat for each employee.
6. Now you can complete your evaluation forms from your personal directory
and will not have to access PEP to finalize the form.

Upon completion, please forward the signed evaluation forms to your HR
Representative NO LATER THAN Friday, February 2, 2001 (Wednesday, January 31,
2001, for EEL).

If you have any questions, please contact the PEP Help Desk at the following
numbers:

Houston:  1-713-853-4777, Option 4
London:  44-207-783-4040, Option 4

Or e-mail your questions to:  perfmgmt@enron.com

Your employees that should receive year end evaluations are listed below:

    GUINN, LINDA
    MERAZ, CLAUDIA
    SWEET, TWANDA Y


(This attachment should work.)

There will be a meeting on Joint Capacity Adequacy on Thursday,
December 20, 2001 at the BWI Airport Marriott in Baltimore, MD.  The
meeting is scheduled from 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.

To register for this meeting, you can forward this e-mail to
<filipov@pjm.com> or fill out the attached form and fax it to Ginny
Filipovic
at 610-666-4762 by December 14, 2001.

Meeting information and directions to the hotel are included in the
attachment below.  If you have any questions, please feel free to call
Ginny at
610-666-4755.

(See attached file: JOINT CAPACITY ADEQUACY MEETING_v1.DOC)

 - JOINT CAPACITY ADEQUACY MEETING_v1.DOC


I'm in

-----Original Message-----
From: Dinh, Huy
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 9:20 AM
To: Harris, Tony; Binns, Darran; Sera, Eddie; Avila, Rafael; 'JNGUYEN@CAMDENLIVING.COM'; 'HXDINH@HOTMAIL.COM'; Orellana, Richard; Tackett, Scott; 'longha624@yahoo.com'; 'BPVinh@CMSenergy.com'; 'baovinh@yahoo.com'; 'bluengold99@yahoo.com'; 'CAL021@Yahoo.com'; Hatten, Micah; Taylor, Michael E; 'rafael_popeye@hotmail.com'; 'Rickngo@yahoo.com'
Subject: Headcount for tonite's Game (6:45) - MUST RELY BY 3:00pm
Importance: High

****** REQUIRE TONITE: REGISTRATION FEES ($10 Enron, $15 Non Enron) ********


Dear Sir:

I have attached my resume for your review.  I have meetings from 8-9, and
10-2 tomorrow.  When would it be best for me to call you?

Cordially,

Gerry

-----Original Message-----
From: Lloyd.Will@enron.com [mailto:Lloyd.Will@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 12:12 PM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
Cc: gsheble@iastate.edu
Subject: RE: opportunities

Thanks Vince.

I have contacted him and have given him your phone number.

He will attempt to contact you Thursady or Friday.

Good luck.

Vince J Kaminski
10/24/2000 03:59 PM

To:   Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:   Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject:  RE: opportunities  (Document link: Lloyd Will)

Lloyd,

Yes, I would be very interested.

Vince

Lloyd Will
10/24/2000 02:45 PM

To:   Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:  RE: opportunities

Vince would you be interested in this professional.

I would be glad to facilitate a conference call.

Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT on 10/24/2000 02:43
PM ---------------------------

"Sheble, G.B." <gsheble@iastate.edu> on 10/17/2000 04:52:57 PM

To:   "'Lloyd.Will@enron.com'" <Lloyd.Will@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  RE: opportunities

Loyd

I tried to call yesterday, but you were out of the office.  My schedule
follows, would you want to pick a time for me to call you or send me a list
of times to pick?

Gerry

Fall 2000 Teaching Schedule
EE 553 MTWR 10 -11 AM Curtis Hall 308
ENGR 161 MW 2-4 Howe Hall 2228
Other Commitments
M 11-12 EP&ES
M 1-2 Office Hours
T 12-2 EP&ES Seminar
T 2-3 Office Hours
T 3-4 PSERC
T 5-6  EPRI-DOD
W 11-12 Office Hours
W 4-9 DSM
R 11-12 Office Hours
F 11-12 P&T
F 1-3 CAS
F 3-4 Departmental Meeting

-----Original Message-----
From: Lloyd.Will@enron.com [mailto:Lloyd.Will@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 8:00 AM
To: Sheble, G.B.
Subject: RE: opportunities

Give me a call any time to discuss things.

713-853-3383.

Thanks.

"Sheble, G.B." <gsheble@iastate.edu> on 10/15/2000 02:17:02 PM

To:   Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:  RE: opportunities

Lloyd

I am attaching another resume for your review, please pass it along if
there
is any interest.

I would also like to discuss opportunities with you as I expect to graduate
with my MBA Summer 2001.

Cordially,

Gerry

===================================
Gerald B. Shebl,
Professor, Electrical and Computer Engineering
Director of Complex Adaptive Systems Program
1115 Coover Hall
Ames, Iowa 50011
voice: 515.294.3046
FAX: 515.294.4263
email: gsheble@iastate.edu
web: http://www.ee.iastate.edu/~sheble/
===================================

 - short_resume.doc


FYI
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	DiMichele, Richard
Sent:	Friday, April 06, 2001 1:52 PM
To:	Derrick Jr., James
Subject:	Re: FW: rylander  job search

Jim:  It's pretty bad out there as you know.  I don't know of anyone who is hiring in the Bay area, but I will keep on the lookout and pass this on to some others who may have a line on an opportunity.  Rich

	James Derrick/ENRON@enronXgate 04/06/01 10:54 AM 	   To: Richard DiMichele/Enron Communications@Enron Communications  cc:   Subject: FW: rylander  job search

Rich, I am forwarding a message from Jim Rylander and his son, Reagan.  Reagan, who has an MBA from Duke, is looking for a position in the San Franciso area.  If you become aware of any opportunites, I would appreciate your letting Jim or Reagan know.  Thank you.  Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"jim rylander" <rylanderj@home.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22jim+20rylander+22+20+3Crylanderj+40home+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Friday, April 06, 2001 9:21 AM
To:	Derrick Jr., James
Subject:	Fw: rylander  job search

jim-per our discussion.    thanks!

> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Reagan Rylander
> > > To: Rylander, Jim
> > > Sent: 3/6/01 1:32 AM
> > > Subject: job search
> > >
> > > In response to the economic downturn, I am widening my
> > > job-search net to include several types of positions
> > > at several types of technology-related companies in
> > > one location: San Francisco (also Oakland, San Mateo,
> > > San Bruno, Burlingame, Emeryville, Sausalito, Marin,
> > > Berkeley).
> > >
> > > Experience: I received my MBA from Duke's Fuqua School
> > > of Business in May, 2000 and have a work background in
> > > International Logistics/Transportation and Information
> > > Technology.
> > >
> > > Desired Positions: Business Development, Product
> > > Management, Product Marketing positions
> > >
> > > Desired Company Types:
> > > 1) International Logistics/Transportation
> > > (DHL, APL, ?)
> > > 2) Supply Chain/Logistics/eProcurement Technology
> > > (Ariba, iCargo, Rapt, Speedchain, Pakana )
> > > 3)Wireless Technology companies
> > > (Brience, Mobilesys, Openwave, IPWireless)
> > > 4) Larger Technology companies (BMC-type):
> > > (BEA, Webmethods)
> > > 5) Internet marketplaces in music & A/E/C industry
> > > (citadon)
> > >
> > > Some other interesting companies in SF include Avasta,
> > > Kenamea, macromedia, Gap, Levis
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > > Reagan
> > >
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
> > > http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
> > >  <<rylander resume.doc>>
> > >           ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
> > > The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.
> This
> > > email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or
organization
> > > named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
> > > representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any
> > > review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if
> > any,
> > > or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have
received
> > > this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return
> email
> > > and delete this email from your system.  Thank You
> > >
> >
>

 - rylander resume.doc


You are absolutely by far, no comparisons, the best!

	Justin Boyd
	02/28/2001 12:02 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Updated Enron Europe Dept Structure Chart

tana, mark

voila!

j
---------------------- Forwarded by Justin Boyd/LON/ECT on 28/02/2001 18:05
---------------------------

Tracy Foy
01/02/2001 17:22
To: ECT Europe Legal
cc:

Subject: Updated Enron Europe Dept Structure Chart

Please find attached updated structure chart reflecting recent promotions and
new starters.

Many thanks

Tracy


jim,  sorry i could not stay in austin for the formal "thank you" to you for your leadership this past year.  i would add "well done" and please "stay around"!

i would like to follow up on knowing whom i should contact, with your advance permission, for securing legal representation from enron corp. for the firm.  candidly does vicki sharp's position inhibit our serving in that capacity?  i know you approved us 2 years ago but we have not been contacted at all for representation.  we have turned down putative claims against enron for multiple reasons, even those where our role would not have been apparent.
 i believe we can provide cost effective, quality representation in multiple areas of expertise (see our web site at www.gpsolaw.com) and enron would be well served.  let me know your thoughts, on a confidential basis, and i will act accordingly.  i enjoyed having lunch with carrin  as well and i wish you "patience and luck" on your home remodelling.  best personal regards,   roger


We are wrapping up several hours in the office and have tested all
commodities front to back.  We found a few minor issues, primarily reports
with report dates that were incorrect.  The content and underlying
calculations in the reports were correct.  These were really just query and
formatting issues.  All were quick fixes of five minutes or less.  So at this
point we feel confident about our system situation.  More will unfold with
counterparties next week, but hopefully all found this as uneventful as have
we.

Hope your new year's celebration was fun.  We saw pictures of the London
festivies on TV as we were cooking our New Year's eve dinner last night at
home.

See you soon.


We have length on peak Monday, 04-23 in NP-15.  The energy is in PGE3, 25 mws
are under ST-WBOM and 56 mws are in ST-CALI.  We need to sell all 81 mws.  In
Enpower we buy the 25 mws from imbalance under ST-WBOM, and sell them under
ST-WBOM.  ST-WBOM is long at $230.  We buy the 56 mws under the ST-CALI book
and then sell it off for a profit split under the ST-CALI book.  I will be in
Seattle this weekend.  If you have any questions, you can reach me on my cell
phone.

Thanks,
Bill


Brothers of Gamma Omega - My silence is broken!  I laughed my tired old ass off this morning reading the e-mails you guys wrote in response to our newest member Justin Loweth, class of 2000.  I know I'm getting old, when I have a daughter who also graduated from college with the class of 2000! And she is my second college graduate in the family!  I read with interest the observation from "Beek" that our Wooglin Club is comprised of Beta's vintage 1972 to 1978, that makes me apart of that "mystic shrine on high", standup and be counted, brothers of the class of 1972!
" Tox" what is all this crap about Hershey bars; "Dro-w" dead animals parts; no way!  The last time " Good Wood" Berry was seen he was still trying to learn how to run the " guard release deep" down Central Expressway.  That was in 1975 and he is still running!  You guys know that if it were not for all of us crazy bastards in the class of 1972, everyone of you would be model citizens,tea totaliers,and very boring introverts.  We brought out the best in all of you!
Now back to Brother Justin, once a Beta - always a Beta!  If you can stand us you can stand anything,"sing to thee -Beta Theta Pi".  Seriously, Justin's role number is #1,367; I don't remember who number # 367is (I hope not was) but this poor bastard should be our Distinguished Beta " mother of men".  I'm feeling a song here somewhere!  Anybody have a loving cup around?
Homecoming should be a blast!  Have a great time!" Hail to the Beta Theta Pi"!  What a catchy tune - God, I love that song! Memories...........
Yours in -kai-
Phil Morrow
# 388
aka - Tuba

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
 ADVERTISEMENT [IMAGE]
[IMAGE]

 At Homecoming 2000, the BETA TENT had the biggest crowd by far.  Stay connected and consider a future homecoming BETA reunion.  It's incredible...forget the 20 years in between...everyone just seems to pick it up right where they left off years ago.

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service .


Vince, thanks for letting me know. I will see you on Wednesday.

Regards,

Giuseppe

On Mon, 12 Mar 2001 Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com wrote:

> Giuseppe
>
> The dinner is scheduled, as I have mentioned, to you at 7:00 p.m.
> Wednesday at Il Fornaio, Canaletto Room.
>
> Both you and Eric are welcome to join us.
>
> Vince
>
>

             Giuseppe A Paleologo
                                           ::  gappy@stanford.edu    ::
                                           ::  http://www.gappy.org  ::


Bill -

Thanks for the invite -  I won't be able to make it Wednesday.  I'm going with my wife, and, although these seats aren't in the diamond level, it "wouldn't be prudent" for me not to go with her.  I'm confident you understand.  Thanks again.

Rob

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Swanstrom, Bill" <BSwanstrom@lockeliddell.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, October 08, 2001 9:44 AM
To:	Walls Jr., Rob; Haedicke, Mark E.
Subject:	Playoff game on Wednesday

Mark  and Robbie, can you join me in the Diamond Seats for this Wednesday's playoff  game at noon?  Let me know.

H. William Swanstrom
Locke Liddell & Sapp LLPbswanstrom@lockeliddell.com << File: mailto:bswanstrom@lockeliddell.com >>
(713) 226-1143


Today's IssueAlert Sponsors:

[IMAGE]

In an exclusive SCIENTECH PowerHitters interview, Envenergy President and
CEO, Ed Richards, describes an option to building owners being "held hostage"
to proprietary closed systems. The open platform concept of Envenergy is
leveraging IP to connect the complete network of building systems across an
enterprise. Read more at: www.scientech.com

Did you know that SCIENTECH offers unbiased services for:

Strategic I/T Infrastructure Design for Generation, T&D, and Retail
Operations
I/T Strategic Sourcing Consulting
Customer Care Requirements Definition
Application Selection Services
Product and Service Plans
I/T Investment Due Diligence
Secure e-mail, web and operations hosting

To learn more, please contact Jon Brock at jbrock@scientech.com or call him
at 1-505-244-7607, or toll free at 1-888-972-8676.

[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
June 21, 2001

The Southeast RTO:
The "Backstory" Behind the Press Release

By Will McNamara
Director, Electric Industry Analysis

[IMAGE]Owners of transmission systems across Alabama, Florida, Georgia,
Mississippi, and South Carolina have announced the signing of a memorandum of
understanding (MOU) to develop a regional transmission organization (RTO) for
the Southeast. A full list of the Southeast RTO members appears at the end of
this article. Two of the largest members of this new organization are
Southern Company (NYSE: SO) and Santee Cooper. If the transmission owners
prove successful in their efforts to develop this transmission entity, the
RTO would be one of the nation's largest, covering more than 39,000 miles of
transmission with an investment in assets in excess of $6 billion.

Analysis: The dynamics behind this announcement create a backstory that is
not readily available in the press materials being circulated by Southern
Company. However, the development of this much-anticipated RTO illustrates
how transmission infrastructure in the Southeast is assimilating, answers
questions about how Southern Company will comply with federal directives, and
raises speculation about possible impact on the region's already-established
RTO, GridSouth. Further, as FERC has encouraged RTOs to form across the
country, much of the commission's focus has been placed on the Southeastern
United States (along with the West). The Southeast is dominated by large IOUs
that control massive transmission assets. Thus, seeing that Southeastern
transmission systems are ultimately conjoined has been a key priority for
FERC.

You may recall that a few months ago Southern Company applied to FERC to form
its own RTO (the organization that will manage a transmission network within
a particular region). FERC rejected the SeTrans Gridco concept because
Southern Company planned to funnel certain rate incentives to companies other
than the RTO operator, which violated FERC policy. In addition, it is FERC's
general policy to consolidate operating RTOs across the country, and the
commission was concerned that Southern Company would remain too autonomous if
it was the only utility involved in a transmission entity. Thus, FERC
unequivocally told Southern Company to not re-apply for RTO status until it
had explored joining forces with neighboring companies.

Simultaneously, FERC gave conditional approval to GridSouth, an RTO formed by
Carolina Power & Light, Duke Energy and South Carolina Electric & Gas
(SCANA), Southern Company's neighbors to the north. The conditional approval
came with the instruction that GridSouth should engage in dialogue with the
SeTrans Gridco, Santee Cooper and Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) about
joining GridSouth. Again, FERC sent the message that it ultimately hopes to
see a single, large RTO serving the entire Southeast region.

Nevertheless, now Southern Company and Santee Cooper have joined forces with
seven other companies to form a new RTO that will be a completely separate
entity from GridSouth. I contacted GridSouth for a response regarding what
impact (if any) the formation of the new Southeast RTO might have on
GridSouth. However, as of press time, representatives for GridSouth had not
prepared a public statement regarding the proposed transmission entity.

I spoke with John Sell, a Southern Company spokesperson on June 19. Sell
informed me that Southern Company had indeed engaged in negotiations with
GridSouth upon FERC's directive, but determined that GridSouth was "too far
down the road" in terms of its development, and that Southern Company planned
on taking a different approach toward its transmission assets. For instance,
while both entities are for-profit operations, the new Southeast RTO plans to
hire an independent third party to oversee its operations. Further, although
the term "Southeast RTO" is being used in the press release, Sell told me
that among the companies involved the RTO is actually being referred to as
SeTrans (the name of Southern Company's rejected entity). Sell stressed that
the name SeTrans was chosen only because it had been previously established
by Southern Company and should not be seen as any indication that Southern
has majority power over the RTO. In fact, the name will be changed to
something else later this year.

On a related note, one statement that I found particularly interesting in the
press release about the new RTO is that "the companies have also made it
clear that the process is not being controlled by any individual transmission
owner, but rather all participants will help establish the rules by which
they will operate and make decisions." This is clearly a veiled reference to
Southern Company, which was criticized by FERC for being too autonomous in
its original RTO filing. When I spoke with John Sell, he volunteered that
Southern "is not the driver behind this RTO."

Santee Cooper's involvement in the SeTrans RTO also came about in a somewhat
precarious fashion. As noted, FERC specifically asked GridSouth to find a way
to incorporate Santee Cooper, a state-owned utility located in South
Carolina, into its RTO. As Santee Cooper controls about 4,200 miles of
transmission lines covering 75 percent of South Carolina, it is no wonder
that the commission would want to make sure that the public utility was
conjoined in some way to developing RTOs. There was just one problem with
this plan: the South Carolina constitution prohibits Santee Cooper from
joining for-profit enterprises.

The case was closely followed throughout the energy industry as other public
power agencies across the country are also involved in pending negotiations
to join RTOs. New reports indicate that, if the SeTrans RTO is approved by
FERC, it will be the largest RTO in the country to include a public power
entity. However, it is important to note that Desert Star, an RTO based in
Phoenix that connects transmission assets of seven Western states, includes
the Western Area Power Administration (WAPA), which owns about one-third of
the transmission system that serves Colorado and provides power to 28 of 29
of the state's municipal electric systems.

Naturally, as the SeTrans RTO is also classified as a for-profit entity, the
question has been raised of how Santee Cooper will be allowed to join as a
member given the South Carolina law. I spoke with Stephen Pelcher, associate
general counsel of rates and regulations for Santee Cooper, about this
conundrum. There is an important distinction that should be understood.
GridSouth is a wholly owned company under its three utility parents (Carolina
Power & Light, Duke and SCANA). The obstacle facing Santee Cooper's
participation in GridSouth was that the company could not be a shareholder in
a private corporation. Under the SeTrans RTO, in which Santee Cooper is now a
participant, none of the participating companies will have ownership over the
transmission entity. As noted, this was one of Southern Company's main
interests in forming its own RTO as the company intends to hire an
independent third party to oversee its operations. Pelcher told me that the
SeTrans RTO is still in a "preliminary stage" and thus it appears at this
time that participants in the SeTrans RTO will retain ownership of their
transmission assets and only turn over operational control to the independent
third party. Interestingly, Pelcher also told me that Santee Cooper (and, by
extension, the SeTrans RTO) remains in consultation with GridSouth for a
"coordination and implementation service agreement" that would in some way
interconnect the two entities.

One issue that will continue to impact RTOs throughout the country is how
electricity will be transported across independent transmission systems.
Specifically, FERC has been concerned about how power will be traded from one
RTO to another and the possibility that boundaries between two separate RTOs
could become "speed bumps" in the flow of electricity. In fact, the
commission met this week on the issue and continues to formulate policy
related to these "seam issues." Part of the reason that Southern Company's
original, independent RTO plan was rejected was FERC's concern that the
utility was resisting efforts to form a cohesive, interconnected system in
the region. At this point, it appears that FERC favors standardization in how
adjacent RTOs will relate to each other, and thus has instructed developing
RTOs to consult with each other on seam agreements. FERC reportedly is
planning to have a formal policy on the subject ready by the end of this
year. Related to the development of this policy is the debate over whether or
not FERC should take a more active role in forcing consolidation among
developing RTOs so that only a limited number of separate entities exist.

Thus, as the SeTrans RTO continues to grow, it will need to determine how it
will be connected to GridSouth and GridFlorida (and any other adjacent RTOs).
In addition, Southern Company's John Sell disclosed to me that the SeTrans
RTO has formed an MOU with TVA for a seam agreement. At this point, TVA has
made no announcement that it is planning to join the new Southeast RTO and in
fact, as a federal agency, is under no obligation to join an RTO.

The SeTrans RTO plans to file an application with FERC and is preparing for
the commission's deadline of being formed by Dec. 15 of this year. If the
SeTrans RTO (or whatever it is ultimately called) gains FERC's approval, it
will represent a significant part of the Southeast's development into a
functionally competitive electric market. If FERC's stated policy of
consolidating RTOs is effectively applied, ultimately we could see that
GridSouth becomes conjoined to this new RTO, which now includes Southern
Company, Santee Cooper and (through a seam agreement) TVA. Moreover, the
development of the new Southeastern RTO illustrates the complexities of
conjoining companies that transcend federal, state and municipal levels,
along with the challenges of ensuring that adjacent RTOs form synergistic
policies regarding the flow of power.

Members of the Southeast (SeTrans) RTO:

Alabama Electric Cooperative-generation and transmission cooperative
providing wholesale electricity to 21-member distribution systems*17 in
Alabama and four in Florida.

City of Dalton (Ga.) Utilities-full-service utility providing electric,
water, wastewater, natural gas and telecommunications services to the city of
Dalton and portions of Whitfield, Murray, Gordon, Floyd, and Catoosa counties
in Georgia.

City of Tallahassee (Fla.)&#151maintains more than 2,200 miles of
transmission and distribution lines, serving some 98,000 homes and businesses
in the Tallahassee area.

Georgia Transmission Corporation-not-for-profit cooperative owned by 39
electric membership corporations in Georgia. GTC owns approximately $910
million in assets, including more than 2,400 miles of transmission lines and
500 substations across the state.

JEA&#151Formerly known as Jacksonville Electric Authority, a municipally
owned electric supplier serving 35,000 customers in four-county area in
northeast Florida.

Municipal Electricity Authority of Georgia-joint-action state authority
providing wholesale electric generation and transmission to 48 city- or
county-owned electric systems in Georgia.

Santee Cooper&#151South Carolina's state-owned electric and waste water
utility and the state's largest seller of power. The utility is the direct
and indirect source of power for 1.6 million South Carolinians and maintains
4,223 miles of transmission lines.

South Mississippi Electric Power Association-non-profit wholesale electric
power cooperative serving the power requirements of the 350,000 retail
customers of its 11-member distribution cooperatives in the state of
Mississippi.

Southern Company-super-regional energy company with more than 32,000 MW of
electric generating capacity in the Southeast and 26,000 miles of
transmission lines.

An archive list of previous IssueAlerts is available at
www.scientech.com

[IMAGE]
The most comprehensive, up-to-date map of the North American Power System by
RDI/FT Energy is now available from SCIENTECH.
Reach thousands of utility analysts and decision makers every day. Your
company can schedule a sponsorship of IssueAlert by contacting Nancy Spring
via e-mail or calling (505)244-7613. Advertising opportunities are also
available on our website.
SCIENTECH is pleased to provide you with your free,  daily IssueAlert. Let us
know if we can help you with  in-depth analyses or any other SCIENTECH
information  products. If you would like to refer a colleague to receive our
free,  daily IssueAlerts, please reply to this email and include  their full
name and email address or register directly on our site.

If you no longer wish to receive this daily e-mail, send a message to Issue
Alert, and include the word "delete" in the subject line.
SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts(SM) are compiled based on the  independent analysis
of SCIENTECH consultants. The opinions expressed in  SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts
are not intended to predict financial performance  of companies discussed, or
to be the basis for investment decisions of any  kind. SCIENTECH's sole
purpose in publishing its IssueAlerts is to offer  an independent perspective
regarding the key events occurring in the  energy industry, based on its
long-standing reputation as an expert on  energy issues.

Copyright 2001. SCIENTECH, Inc. All rights  reserved.


Kay:

1.  I am now sending over a package with documents for execution by ENA or
the LLC.  I believe that everything is included except for the membership
certificates.

2.  Greg Lang advised this morning that the PPL membership certificate will
need to be in the possession of the collateral agent on the closing date,
and asked if we would agree on an understanding to have the certificate
delivered in escrow to the collateral agent the night before closing.  I
said we could accommodate his request.  We will need to get the membership
certificates signed early next week.

3.  Greg asked whether ENA made the timing on its notices etc. to close on
Wednesday, May 2.  Please advise.

4.  Greg also wants ENA to discuss with GE the timing on the delivery of the
L/C.  This may affect the wording in the escrow disbursement instruction
letter, but it will not affect the signature page.

Thanks.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.


I'll get started on Phil's pc and ship Kathy's next week.  You owe $50 or
whatever you want to contribute.

Thanks Rob

-----Original Message-----
From: Steven.J.Kean@enron.com [mailto:Steven.J.Kean@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2001 6:46 AM
To: rob.kean@worldnet.att.net
Subject: Re: Phil's Birthday

I'm in.  A;lso, I don't think we have settled up on Mom and Dad's xmas
present yet.  What do I owe?

"Rob Kean"
<rob.kean@worldne        To:     "Doug & Karen Reiman
\(E-mail\)"
t.att.net>               <dkreiman@mcleodusa.net>,
"Steve & Melissa Kean
\(E-mail\)" <skean@enron.com>,
"Melissa Kean
02/05/2001 09:05         \(E-mail\)" <kean@rice.edu>
PM                       cc:
Please respond to        Subject:     Phil's Birthday
rob.kean

It's alittle early to be talking about Phil's birhtday but I have had some
conversations with him about replacing his PC with a more modern one that I
will build for him.  I want to know if you want to go in with me. He'll get
the PC in the near future but I don't expect anyone to contribute until his
birthday.

Here's the way it would work: we give Phil a new PC, I send an old Compaq
of
ours to Kathy and Alan Wedig, Phil sends his old PC to some friends of mine
who live in Duluth, MN.  That means that our entire family will be
connected.

If not, I would send the Old Compaq to Phil otherwise and then he could
send
his old one to Kathy and Alan.  The only problem with this scenario is that
Phil's old PC is getting a little too old.  Our friends in Duluth wouldn't
mind getting an old PC because they've never owned one.  I thought that
Phil
would benefit the most from getting a brand new PC.  The old Compaq is will
still be okay for a while and Kathy should be fine with it.

What do you guys think?  If i do this right, Kathy would have a PC for her
birhtday in March.

Rob


Refined Products recognized $6,300 of Originations on their P&L that was not
included in the Originations file.

Thanks,
Robin


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 05/19/2000
10:46 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Jeffrey A Shankman                           05/18/2000 06:27 PM

To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Keith Holst/HOU/ECT@ect, Mike
Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Large Deal Alert

---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 05/18/2000
08:23 PM ---------------------------

Bruce Sukaly@ENRON
05/18/2000 08:20 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Maggi/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey A
Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Large Deal Alert

To make a long story short.

Williams is long 4000MW of tolling in SP15 (SoCal )  for 20 years (I know I
did the deal)
on Tuesday afternoon, Williams sold 1000 MW to Merrill Lynch for the
remaining life (now 18 years)

Merrill is short fixed price gas at So Cal border  up to 250,000MMBtu a day
and long SP15 power (1000 MW) a day.

heat rate 10,500  SoCal Border plus $0.50.

I'm not sure if MRL has just brokered this deal or is warehousing it.

For what its worth........


Thanks.  I want to go to the gallery.  Mark

	Randy Young@ENRON
	02/02/2001 06:37 PM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Art Galleries, etc.

Mark

There are a lot of art galleries in Sao Paulo, but I am not sure what you
like.  The place I was telling you about is Galeria Jacques Ardies.  Jacques'
gallery is one of the two best (I think) specializing in contemporary
Brazilian "naif" artists.  Most of his stuff is really interesting, vibrant,
"Brazilian" pieces (many from the Northeast of Brazil where they have the
greatest African influence and a very rich culture).  Kind of funky and "out
there,"  but I really like it.  He also has some terrific textile works by
Madeleine Colaco, an artist who has become very popular in the United States
(we have one of her wall hangings in our den).

Jacques' web site is at http://ardies.com/quemingl.htm.  I don't think it is
very representative of what you will find there, but take a look.

There are plenty of other galleries that you can go to as well. Let's talk
about what you want to see on the way down, and I will give it some thought.

By the way,  I am scheduled to have lunch with Lance on Thursday, and I have
a phone call into Alan asking for a time with him as well.  I will keep you
posted.

Regards,
Randy


GE has agreed to the requested changes to the parent guaranty.

Kay

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 04/24/2001 10:40:53 AM
To: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Delta Documents for GE

 <<GE.LegalOpin.DOC>>  <<GE.Consent.DOC>>  <<GE.Receipt.DOC>>
<<GE.Ltr.Forms.DOC>>

Kay:

We have attached execution copies of the following documents for execution
by GE:

1.  GE Letter re Forms of Agreement;
2.  GE Consent and Agreement;
3.  Legal Opinion of Counsel to GE;
4.  GE Receipt.

These documents were circulated by Isabel Parker to Kent Shoemaker, you, me
and others on April 23, 2001.

The only other document is the GE Parent Guaranty.  Greg Lang circulated
comments (in a PDF file) by an e-mail 4/18 at 5:59 p.m.   Greg asked earlier
today whether the form of this document had been agreed by GE and I could
not respond.

You should have the following documents:

1.  Assignment and Assumption Agreement; and
2.  Turbine Contract.

Several of the ENA documents are not yet finalized, so I will try to get
those to you after lunch.  Please send over the LLC certificate book in
order that we may prepare membership certificates.

If you have any questions or comments, please advise.  Thanks.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

Enclosures

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - GE.LegalOpin.DOC
 - GE.Consent.DOC
 - GE.Receipt.DOC
 - GE.Ltr.Forms.DOC


I have not had any contact from anyone in Europe regarding you previous email.

Rodolfo Freyre@ENRON
11/01/2000 07:34 AM
Sent by: Rodolfo Freyre@ENRON
To: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: trip to Sp.

Scott,

I understand that John Lavorato and others are going to Sao Paulo next week
to review the Trading business. Are you planing to join them in that trip? If
you do, come to BA and we play some golf at Pilar.

Did someone from Europe contact you to ask about me?

Chau.

Rolo


Start Date: 4/11/01; HourAhead hour: 6;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041106.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 6 / Preferred:  36.25 / Final:  20.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: TOSCO
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/11/01
  UNIT_ID: UNCHEM_1_UNIT

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 6 / Preferred:  47.00 / Final:  46.99)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTstSW
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/11/01
  TIE_POINT: MEAD_2_WALC
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_8000
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL
+++ Hour 6 - bad data from ISO.
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/11/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_BUNNY
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL
+++ Hour 6 - bad data from ISO.
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/11/01
  TIE_POINT: SLVRPK_7_SPP
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_BUNNY
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 6 / Preferred:   0.45 / Final:   0.30)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/11/01
  SC_ID: EPMI
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 6 / Preferred:   4.89 / Final:   3.33)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE2
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/11/01
  SC_ID: EPMI
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 6 / Preferred:  44.68 / Final:  30.17)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE3
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/11/01
  SC_ID: EPMI
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 6 / Preferred: 100.17 / Final: 100.16)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: SDG1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/11/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


EBS Update
Gov Davis/Skilling Update
Meeting w/Sempra
Coffee with Rebecca Smith
QF support for ENA
Miscellaneous

	Joseph Alamo
	10/10/2000 12:37 PM

		 To: Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Sandra
McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marcie Milner/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Agenda Items Request for Next Staff Meeting

Please consider this request for your agenda items, if any, for the next
Staff Meeting, currently scheduled for this Thursday, October 12th at 8:30
a.m. PDT.

Please forward to me by 5:00 p.m. PDT, Wednesday, October 11th.

Thanks in advance for your assistance.

Joseph Alamo
Sr. Administrative Assistant
Government Affairs - The Americas
San Francisco CA


Here's the TurboPark consent.  Please call me if you  have any comments, as I
want to send it out tonight.

Sheila, I've spoken with Lee Johnson and John Schroeder, and they are lined
up to sign at 900 tomorrow.

Thanks,

Kay

PS this is consent to send 12 to TurboPark. This gives us room if the Coral
deal doesn't happen in time.


I am assuming that you are saying that if repos go through the Prime Broker
accounts it is a problem.  The poblem being that the current brokerage
agreements for ECI do not provide for repos.  Is my assumption correct?

Is our UCD adequate as is for repos?

What is our existing format that you mention below?

Are you able to pursue this with Goldman right now today?

Thanks,

Tom

From: Sara Shackleton@ECT on 04/16/2001 08:36 AM
To: Tom Doukas/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Enron Credit Inc. ("ECI")

Tom:

I am not certain that the existing resolution permits repurchase and reverse
repurchase transactions and securities lending, bonds borrow pledge, etc. as
the brokerage consent was not written to accommodate these types of
transactions.  However, if the repo party will accept our existing format,
then we need not worry.  I'll call Ted Leh and try to find the proper Goldman
person.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Tom Doukas@ENRON
	04/16/2001 08:10 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron, David A Wall/Risk Mgmt/LON/ECT@ECT, Greg
Hedger/LON/ECT@ECT, Reza Rezaeian/EU/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Re: Enron Credit Inc. ("ECI")

Sara,

Can you please provide your findings on the following items:

1. Determine with Cheryl that ECI is in fact authorized to transact Repos

2. How robust the Goldman Repo agreements are, and their sutability to ECI.

3. An estimate on how long it will take to set up the Goldman Repo Agreements
in ECI's name.

Can you please also provide any ideas how ECI or ECL could transact a Repo
trade today using existing documentation.

London has indicated an urgent need to carry out these transactions.

Thanks,

Tom


This was sent to me by one of the developers.  I believe it relates to an
expansion (or new interconnection) of the Caledonia facility.  I don't know
which lawyer has been working on it, so I'm sending it around to see if
anyone claims it. Chris thought that someone from Power Trading may have been
working on it.

Kay

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/10/2000 02:16
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Chris Booth                           10/10/2000 12:48 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Option Agreement and Easement

Kay,

This is the format for the land options that Robert Shaw of New Century is
using in Caledonia, MS.  Please advise if these documents are appropriate.

Thanks,

Chris
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Booth/NA/Enron on 10/10/2000 12:42
PM ---------------------------

Mona Harvey <harveym@ncess.com> on 10/10/2000 11:20:08 AM
Please respond to "harveym@ncess.com" <harveym@ncess.com>
To: "Chris Booth (E-mail)" <Chris.Booth@Enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Option Agreement and Easement

Chris,
 Robert Shaw asked me to send these documents to you.

Please call either of us at 713-757-9771 if you need additional information.

Sincerely,
Mona Harvey

 - Easement - Caledonia Project (3-9-00).doc
 - Option to Purchase ROW-Caledonia Project (3-9-00).doc


Hello Vince and Shirley,

Thank you so much for your patience as I tried to shuffle dates and events
around!  I have some great news.  I was able to secure a room on campus at
the Faculty Club for the presentation on Monday October 16th at 7:00 - 9:00.
That should work out perfectly as far as being about to present at the
seminar from 3:30 - 5:00.  Furthermore, I was able to adjust the resume drop
dates so that we have through the week of the 16th for students to submit
their resumes.

I will go into more detail about this tomorrow at the Cal Berkeley Team
Meeting.  I have put together some booklets to hand out to the team
tomorrow.  Vince, I have put some time into the agenda for you to welcome the
team and get everyone excited about Cal recruiting this Fall.  Thank you for
all of your help!  Please let me know if there is something that you would
like me to add to the agenda for tomorrow.

Thanks!
Ashley


Hi Paul,
Well lets see - where do I start- first of all I am in the process of moving
to Denver- I am still in Scottsdale, AZ. I am moving next week to the
Littleton area.  It been very annoying to move around this time but I had
to. I took a position with the Denver Federal Center and they wanted me to
start asap.  So I decided to make the move!

About me- I am 27 yrs old- very ambitious.  I work very hard but love to
play hard as well. I feel that lifes to short and to be stressed out is just
not worth it.  I like to be around professional people but they have to have
a great sense of humor and like to have fun.  Someone with no personality is
just not for me!!! I've been told I have a very warm personality- I pretty
much can get along with everyone.  It surprises people but I never could
understand that. They usually say that if they didnt know me, thats not what
they would think.
I actually like to do about anything once.  My philosophy on what I like to
do is - its not "what" we do its "who" we do it with. I do enjoy very much
to go out and experience the nicer restaurants. I enjoy the theatre and
musicals.  I can go on and on....
So if I havent answered your question.  Do ask...
DO you have any other pics to share?
Marlene

>From: <plucci01@talkmatch.com>
>To: <marleneg1@hotmail.com>
>Subject: Match.com - You've Got Mail: Hello Again!
>Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 12:05:36 -0600
>
>Marlene,
>
>Thanks for the email.  Ok, I'll tell you more; I'm 36, I live in Broomfield
>but work downtown.  I'm currently looking to sell my place in Broomfield
>and move west into the area around Golden.  Maybe Lookout Mountain or
>Genesee, Broomfield is ok when you're married, which I was for 4 years now
>divorced two, but a little far from everything when you're single.
>Athletic but only competitive when provoked.  How am I doing so far?
>
>I moved to Colorado from Texas (San Antonio) in 1992, and I don't think I'm
>going back, although I'm in the energy business which is run primarily out
>of Houston, TX.  No pets or kids due to the fact that I travel somewhat
>frequently for my job and pleasure.  Well at least the travel and pets part
>the kid's part is for other reasons, which I'm sure you can imagine.  I
>like to ski but prefer the summer better.  And finally, if I get this job
>I'll work very hard to insure this company remains profitable and loyal to
>it's customers.  Oh sorry I got off on a tangent.
>
>So now it's your turn, "tell me more."
>
>
>Paul
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>*********************************************************
>
>ADDITIONAL TIPS from Match.com:
>
>Our anonymous re-mailer will strip away your real email address, so
>that it will NOT appear in the 'From:' line.
>
>You may also contact this person from their Match.com profile by
>clicking 'Contact this person' and composing your message directly from the
>site.
>
>However:
>
>* Check to ensure that your email address is not in the BODY of your
>message as we are unable to remove these.
>
>* Check to ensure that you REMOVE ANY AUTOMATIC SIGNATURE at the end of
>
>your email. And note that you cannot use 'Cc:' or 'Bcc:' if you want
>your email to remain anonymous.
>
>Match.com does not monitor private email between members, nor are we
>liable for the content of these messages. All members are bound by our
>Match.com Service Agreement.

_________________________________________________________________
Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com

*********************************************************

IMPORTANT TIPS TO REMAIN ANONYMOUS AT Match.com:

If you use the "reply" button to respond to this message, please take the following steps:

1.  DELETE ALL TEXT from the body of your message, including header information which may include your actual email address.

2.  REMOVE ANY AUTOMATIC SIGNATURES which may include your personal contact information.

Our anonymous re-mailer will strip away your real email address (in the From: field), so that it will NOT appear in the "From:" line. However, DO NOT use the "Cc:" or "Bcc:" fields as these addresses CANNOT be stripped away.

You may also contact this person from their Match.com profile by clicking "Contact this person" and composing your message directly from the site.

Match.com does not monitor private email between members, nor are we liable for the content of these messages. All members are bound by our Match.com Service Agreement.


[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]

Dear Martin,

Some time ago, you registered with us at GroceryWorks. We noticed you've
never completed a purchase and we'd really like you to give us a try. We hope
that you have visited us lately and have noticed the improvements we've made
to our site. Our sale page is updated weekly and we've added many new items
just in time for the holidays.

[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
???
Shop & Save!
Because we value you and want you as a customer, we're giving you $15 off
your next purchase of groceries. That's right! When you make a purchase of
$75 or more, GroceryWorks will deduct $15 off your total. Just enter MISSU6
when prompted during checkout to receive your savings. Hurry - this offer
expires January 15, 2001.

If you haven't visited lately, here is just a sample of the new aisles and
merchandise now available.

Holiday Solutions!
We have lots of solutions for the busy holiday season. You'll find
spiral-sliced honey-glazed hams, gourmet gift baskets, party platters,
ready-to-eat gourmet meals and fresh fruit baskets in our NEW Happy Holidays
aisle.

Let Us Do The Heavy Lifting!
Are you tired of lugging those big, heavy items home from the store? Just
visit our NEW Value aisle and select your favorite economy size item, add it
to your cart and let GroceryWorks deliver it right to your door. All with
just a click of a mouse.

Flowers Are Blooming!
Fresh flowers are in bloom in our NEW Floral aisle. Whether you are looking
for some flowers to remind you of spring or to put the finishing touch on
your home for the holidays, GroceryWorks has a great selection to choose
from.

FastShop Makes Shopping Quick & Easy!
Don't forget, our FastShop feature makes return shopping trips a breeze.
FastShop collects your product purchases and keeps them organized by
category. Each time you return to the website, all of your favorite products
are listed. You can quickly add products to your cart from here and it even
indicates if the item is on sale.

We hope you can't wait to get started...simply click GroceryWorks.com and
enter your user name and password to begin shopping with Your Friendly
Neighborhood Online Grocer.

[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]

		* Offer valid from December 8, 2000 ) January 15, 2001. One coupon per
household please. Coupon may not be combined with any other coupon or
promotional offer. Not valid for the purchase of tobacco or alcohol products,
and these are not eligible toward the $75 required minimum purchase. Offer
valid for online purchases only. $15 savings does not apply to prior
purchases.
		You received this email because you are a registered customer of
GroceryWorks.com. If you prefer not to receive any information regarding
website enhancements, sales or promotions please click here and you will be
removed from our email list. GroceryWorks, 14001 N. Dallas Parkway, Suite
M-100, Dallas, TX 75240.

[IMAGE]