From: Mark Whitney
TheLaw.net Corporation
Homepage: http://www.thelaw.net
Remove: http://www.thelaw.net/remove.htm

  By late November folks aren't thinking about legal research, they're thinking about food. Our answer:

--discount subscriptions to TheLaw.net for the month of November by up to 20%
--send you something sharp and something sweet

  Subscribe to TheLaw.net before the end of November and we'll immediately direct the farm families of the Cabot Creamery in Cabot, Vermont, to ship you a pint of their pure Vermont Maple Syrup and a pound of their Vintage Vermont Cheddar. See, http://www.cabotcheese.com
see also http://www.thelaw.net/cabotoffer.htm

?AND SAVE 20% ON THELAW.NET CONVENIENCE EDITION!

  Just $395 (save $100!) on TheLaw.net Convenience Edition. TheLaw.net is a custom legal browser. It is very easy to use. $395 covers you for a year. You have unlimited access to everything. Install at work at home and on your laptop and feel-free to hand the software off to your trusted assistant at no extra charge. And did we mention there's a 30-day unconditional money back guarantee.

  Our Small Office Special is on sale, too, and the prices for multi-user Workgroups look even more attractive. See, http://www.thelaw.net/subscribe.htm

  Of course, our large competitors' databases have been a work in progress for generations. But, times have changed. A judicial opinion does not take on greater precedential value merely because it's fed to you via a WestLaw pipeline. It just costs more to read it. If you take a look at the searchable case law database you'll have UNLIMITED access to with TheLaw.net we stack up quite nicely, particularly when you consider the price.
See, http://www.thelaw.net/caselawgrid.htm

  By deploying TheLaw.net in your world you may discover that:

----your online productivity increases ten fold
----the list of expensive subscription items is much shorter
----it makes sense to turn to the big guns only when you cannot otherwise find the answer elsewhere, faster, cheaper.

?UNRESOLVED MANAGEMENT ISSUES

  Are you one of the select few who wants for little or nothing, or are you in a pick-and-choose mode with the overwhelming majority of your colleagues when it comes to choosing legal research resources?

     --What do you do when you have to research across state lines?

     --What do you do with a Federal question that properly demands a national look across all thirteen Federal circuits?

     --Our subscribers snicker to themselves, click a checkbox to search all states or all Federal and they pay not one thin additional dime for the privilege. (See covered jurisdictions listed below the signature line.)

"I AM IN MY SWEATS DOING BILLABLE RESEARCH. I LOVE IT!"

     And there you have our new favorite quote, from a new subscriber leaving a large firm to start her own thing. We have others; lots of them. See, http://www.thelaw.net/references.htm

     What's not to like?

--TheLaw.net is less than $1 a day for an individual annual subscription to our Solo Edition. Even less per day, per workgroup user. See, http://www.thelaw.net/susbcribe.htm

--Enter a statutory cite into the search engine, and pop up cases construing that item, in one mouse click. See, http://www.thelaw.net/statutes.htm

--Have a case citation you need to know more about? Find cases construing that item in one mouse click. Simple.

--Easy to use? Do you know how to operate a browser, shuttle through little windows folders and do electronic case law research? If so, you're on your way to being a guru using TheLaw.net. If you don't know how to perform these tasks, we will teach at no cost.

--PERFORM UNKNOWN ITEM SEARCHES: Use Boolean and, or, not, near, within, adjacent, nesting, truncation See, Sample Searches: http://www.thelaw.net/searchdemo/home.htm

--PERFORM KNOWN ITEM SEARCHES: Field search by cite, party, counsel, docket, author, date or panel.  See, http://www.thelaw.net/help/operators.htm

--CHOCK FULL. SEARCH TO YOUR HEART'S CONTENT

--Millions of searchable cases - across nearly 200 Federal and state jurisdictions - updated four times daily - unlimited use - Federal and state statutes - State Administrative Codes - CFR - Federal Register - Public Laws - State and Federal Rules - State and Federal Executive Agency Databases - Bill Tracking Tools - Corporate Backgrounders - Thousands of Practice Area Helpers -  Reference Desk - People Finders - Every Major Metro Paper - Nearly 150 Major News Columnists - and much, much more. (Current case jurisdictions, statutes and regulations are listed below the signature line for your convenience.)

ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION PRICES

SOLO EDITION: $345 annually - you and one machine - less than $1 a day
http://www.thelaw.net/subscribe.htm

CONVENIENCE EDITION SALE PRICE: $395 annually - SAVE $100 when you sign up by November 30. Install at work, at home and on your laptop and your paralegal gets TheLaw.net, too - at no extra charge! http://www.thelaw.net/susbcribe.htm

SMALL OFFICE SPECIAL SALE PRICE: $575 annually - SAVE $120 when you sign up by November 30. This is for you, your partner and up to two paralegals http://www.thelaw.net/subscribe.htm

THREE LAWYER WORKGROUP: $795 annually
FOUR LAWYER WORKGROUP: $995 annually
FIVE LAWYER WORKGROUP: $1195 annually

ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS INCLUDE: unlimited access, a lack of meters, no surprises, a 30 day unconditional money back guarantee, unlimited, world class tech and reference support. What's stopping you?

SUBSCRIBE ONLINE - 30 DAY MONEY BACK GUARANTEE

     Sign up risk-free at: http://www.thelaw.net/fulfillment.htm or call in toll free 1.877.4.LAWNET with any questions or if you would like us to book your subscription for you.

     Join us today at TheLaw.net Corporation, where the availability of vast resources is not limited to those with vast resources. We'll do our level best to ensure your success - whatever it takes.

Regards,

Mark Whitney
President and CEO
TheLaw.net Corporation
San Diego - Chicago, USA
Toll Free 877.452.9638
Fax: 858.554.0968
whitney@thelaw.net
http://www.thelaw.net
"Information Retrieval Solutions for the Legal Profession"

****************************************************************
PRIVACY STATEMENT: TheLaw.net respects your time and we believe this is the fastest, least intrusive method of originating contact with busy professionals.  But we also provide several mechanisms allowing recipients to remove themselves  easily and at no cost. Simply go to: http://www.thelaw.net/remove.htm OR reply  to: remove@thelaw.net and enter the email address that you would like removed in the subject line or call toll free 1.877.452.9638. See also:  http://www.thelaw.net and click "Privacy Statement".
*****************************************************************

IMPORTANT NOTICE: The proprietary searchable case law database included with your subscription is updated four times daily. However, on November 6, 2001, we did a count of entries by jurisdiction. What follows is a list of jurisdictions, the year coverage begins and the number of judicial opinions and orders in each library. A list of statutes and administrative codes is provided far below.

United States Supreme Court, 1900, 213,891

 Federal Circuit, 1982, 18350

 U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Cir., 1950, 14,345
  D.C. Court of Appeals, 1945, 11,546

 U.S. Court of Appeals, 1st Cir., 1930, 18,350
  Maine Supreme Judicial Court, 1996, 1,558
  Mass. Supreme Judicial Court, 1930, 32,329
  Massachusetts Appeals Court
  New Hampshire Supreme Court, 1930, 9,026
  Rhode Island Supreme Court, 1950, 8,899

 U.S. Court of Appeals, 2nd Cir., 1930, 41,598
  Connecticut Supreme Court, 1950, 14,824
  Connecticut Appellate Court
  New York Court of Appeals, 1955, 425,966
  N.Y. Supreme Ct., App. Div. 1st
  N.Y. Supreme Ct., App. Div. 2nd
  N.Y. Supreme Ct., App. Div. 3rd
  N.Y. Supreme Ct., App. Div. 4th
  N.Y. Supreme Ct., App. Term 1st
  N.Y. Supreme Ct., App. Term 2nd
  Vermont Supreme Court, 1930, 7,903

 U.S. Court of Appeals, 3rd. Cir., 1930, 35,052
  U.S. District Court, New Jersey, 1999
  Supreme Court of Delaware, 1950, 24,859
  New Jersey Supreme Court, 1930, 44,830
  N.J. Superior Court, Appellate Division
  U.S. District Court, E.D.Pa., 1997
  Pennsylvania Supreme Court, 1950, 146,850
  Pennsylvania Superior Court
  Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court

 U.S. Court of Appeals, 4th Cir., 1930, 62,794
  U.S. District Court, Maryland, 1999
  Maryland Court of Appeals, 1950, 20,269
  Maryland Special Court of Appeals
  North Carolina Supreme Court, 1945, 57,601
  North Carolina Court of Appeals, 1968
  U.S. District Court, South Carolina, 1999
  South Carolina Supreme Court, 1996, 1,944
  South Carolina Court of Appeals
  Virginia Supreme Court, 1930, 18,174
  Virginia Court of Appeals
  W. Va. Supreme Court. of Appeals, 1991, 7,130

 U.S. Court of Appeals, 5th Cir., 1930, 80,543
  Louisiana Supreme Court, 1980, 57,879
  Louisiana Court of Appeals, 1st Circuit
  Louisiana Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit
  Louisiana Court of Appeals, 3rd Circuit
  Louisiana Court of Appeals, 4th Circuit
  Louisiana Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit
  U.S. District Court, N. Mississippi, 1997
  Mississippi Supreme Court, 1954, 17,890
  Mississippi Court of Appeals
  Texas Supreme Court, 1950, 109,548
  Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
  Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District
  Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District
  Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District
  Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District
  Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District
  Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District
  Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District
  Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District
  Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District
  Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District
  Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
  Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District

 U.S. Court of Appeals, 6th Cir., 1930, 56,247
  Kentucky Supreme Court, 1945, 22,235
  Kentucky Court of Appeals
  Michigan Supreme Court, 1930, 75,322
  Michigan Court of Appeals
  Ohio Supreme Court, 1950, 42,660
  Ohio Court of Appeals, 1st District
  Ohio Court of Appeals, 2nd District
  Ohio Court of Appeals, 3rd District
  Ohio Court of Appeals, 4th District
  Ohio Court of Appeals, 5th District
  Ohio Court of Appeals, 6th District
  Ohio Court of Appeals, 7th District
  Ohio Court of Appeals, 8th District
  Ohio Court of Appeals, 9th District
  Ohio Court of Appeals, 10th District
  Ohio Court of Appeals, 11th District
  Ohio Court of Appeals, 12th District
  Tennessee Supreme Court, 1950, 47,199
  Tennessee Ct. of Appeals, M. Grand Div.
  Tennessee Ct. of Appeals, E. Grand Div.
  Tennessee Ct. of Appeals, W. Grand Div.
  Tennessee Ct. of Crim. App., M. Grand Div.
  Tennessee Ct. of Crim. App. E. Grand Div.
  Tennessee Ct. of Crim. App. W. Grand Div.

U.S. Court of Appeals, 7th Cir., 1930, 39,924
  Illinois Supreme Court, -1985, 31,813
  Illinois Appellate Court, 1st District
  Illinois Appellate Court, 2nd District
  Illinois Appellate Court, 3rd District
  Illinois Appellate Court, 4th District
  Illinois Appellate Court, 5th District
  Indiana Supreme Court, 1940, 41,931
  Indiana Court of Appeals, 1st District
  Indiana Court of Appeals, 2nd District
  Indiana Court of Appeals, 3rd District
  Indiana Court of Appeals, 4th District
  Indiana Court of Appeals, 5th District
  Indiana Tax Court
  Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1945, 27,871
  Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District I
  Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District II
  Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District III
  Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District IV

 U.S. Court of Appeals, 8th Cir., 1930, 47,131
  Arkansas Supreme Court, 1957, 23,949
  Arkansas Court of Appeals
  Iowa Supreme Court, 1995, 3,746
  Iowa Court of Appeals
  Minnesota Supreme Court, 1930, 42,152
  Minnesota Court of Appeals
  Missouri Supreme Court, 1960, 53,104
  Missouri Court of Appeals
  Nebraska Supreme Court, 1965, 13,926
  Nebraska Court of Appeals
  U.S. District Court, North Dakota, 1999
  North Dakota Supreme Court, 1930, 8,672
  North Dakota Court of Appeals
  South Dakota Supreme Court, 1965, 5,424

 U.S. Court of Appeals, 9th Cir., 1941, 73,974
  Alaska Supreme Court, 1960, 8,009
  Alaska Court of Appeals
  Arizona Supreme Court, 1930, 21,928
  Arizona Court of Appeals, 1st Division
  Arizona Court of Appeals, 2nd Division
  U.S. District Court, Central, California, 1998
  California Supreme Court, 1930, 107,137
  California Court of Appeal, 1st Appellate Dt.
  California Court of Appeal, 2nd Appellate Dt.
  California Court of Appeal, 3rd Appellate Dt.
  California Court of Appeal, 4th Appellate Dt.
  California Court of Appeal, 5th Appellate Dt.
  California Court of Appeal, 6th Appellate Dt.
  Hawaii Supreme Court, 1930, 7,116
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
  Idaho Supreme Court, 1965, 7,948
  Idaho Court of Appeals
  Montana Supreme Court, 1993, 2,724
  Nevada Supreme Court, 1950, 7,240
  Oregon Supreme Court, 1950, 71,910
  Oregon Court of Appeals
  Washington Supreme Court, 1935, 52,437
  Washington Court of Appeals, 1st Division
  Washington Court of Appeals, 2nd Division
  Washington Court of Appeals, 3rd Division

 U.S. Court of Appeals, 10th Cir., 1930, 33,347
  Tenth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel
  Colorado Supreme Court, 1930, 29,715
  Colorado Court of Appeals
  Kansas Supreme Court, 1982, 5,937
  Kansas Court of Appeals
  New Mexico Supreme Court, 1930, 17,135
  New Mexico Court of Appeals
  Oklahoma Supreme Court, 1954, 19,714
  Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals
  Oklahoma Court of Appeals
  Utah Supreme Court, 1950, 10,905
  Utah Court of Appeals
  Wyoming Supreme Court, 1993, 1,527

 U.S. Court of Appeals, 11th Cir., 1981, 36,724
  Alabama Supreme Court, 1955, 76,618
  Alabama Court of Civil Appeals
  Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
  Florida Supreme Court, 1950, 114,978
  Florida District Court of Appeal, 1st District
  Florida District Court of Appeal, 2nd District
  Florida District Court of Appeal, 3rd District
  Florida District Court of Appeal, 4th District
  Florida District Court of Appeal, 5th District
  Georgia Supreme Court, 1940, 83,838
  Georgia Court of Appeals

*******************************************
ADMINISTRATIVE CODES - ADMINISTRATIVE CODES

FEDERAL

Code of Federal Regulations
Federal Register
Executive Orders
OMB Circulars
Public Laws

STATE

Alabama Administrative Code
Alaska Administrative Code
Arizona Administrative Code
Arkansas Register
California Code of Regulations
Code of Colorado Regulations
Florida Administrative Code
Rules and Regulations of the State of Georgia
Hawaii Administrative Rules
Idaho Administrative Code
Illinois Administrative Code
Indiana Administrative Code
Iowa Administrative Code
Code of Maine
Code of Maryland Regulations
Code of Massachusetts Regulations
Michigan Administrative Code
Minnesota Rules
Missouri Code of State Regulations
Nebraska Administrative Code
Nevada Administrative Code
New Hampshire Administrative Rules
New York Rules and Regulations
North Carolina Administrative Code and Rules
Ohio Administrative Code
Oregon Administrative Rules
The Pennsylvania Code
South Carolina Code of Regulations
South Dakota Register
Tennessee Rules and Regulations
Texas Administrative Code
Utah Administrative Code
Virginia Administrative Code
Washington Administrative Code
West Virginia Code of State Rules
Wisconsin Administrative Code and Register


In case folks haven't already heard through other sources, a reliable person
told me that PG&E is hedged for core gas requirements:

financial--for 45% of core volumes at prices "in the single digits/decatherm"
physical--for 15% of core volumes (via storage) at prices "less than the
financial hedge"

SDG&E is naked.

SoCalGas is likely in the same boat as SDG&E, or worse, since they optioned
core's storage gas to noncore customers, and, those customers are exercising.


Hi Friends!

The big Rice-ALP final presentation day is almost here:  MONDAY, May 7th,
4pm,    at Enron, 1400 Smith.  Please come to the Enron Lobby and ask for me
or my assistant, Melinda McCarty.

After the presentation, you are cordially invited to dinner and an Astro's
game (vs Phillies)  at the Enron Box at Enron Field.  As participation in the
Enron Box at Enron Field is limited to this special invitation list only,
please confirm your attendance via return eMail, or via voice mail to me at
713-853-6117 ASAP.

We're very excited about the work the Rice ALP team has done and we're all
greatly looking forward to the presentation.

Hope to see everyone Monday!!

Best regards!

--Christie.


Don't know his capabilities well enough to make an accurate assessment.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Calger, Christopher F.
Sent:	Monday, January 28, 2002 12:24 PM
To:	Milnthorp, Rob; Presto, Kevin M.
Subject:	Brian Redmond

Lavo thinks we should consider Redmond as a good candidate to fill one of the marketing holes that we have in East Power or gas.  Any thoughts?

Chris Calger
503-464-3735


I just noticed a glitch, which I'll fix.  Do you have any comments?

Fred Mitro@ECT
01/30/2001 02:58 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Rusty Stevens/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: SPA - PSEG Transaction

Rusty is in Florida today through Friday.  I received the hard copy you sent
down (thanks) and will review it.   From your perspective, is this document
ready to be sent out?  I would like to get it in PSEG's hands ASAP.  Let me
know.

Fred

Kay Mann@ENRON
01/30/2001 11:57 AM
To: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: SPA - PSEG Transaction

Have you asked Rusty?  I believe Kathleen gave him a hard copy yesterday.  I
made the changes myself.

Fred Mitro@ECT
01/30/2001 09:25 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Rusty Stevens/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: SPA - PSEG Transaction

Kay:

What is the status of the draft Securities Purchase Agreement for the sale of
ENA's Illinois project entities?

Please let me know.  Rusty and I need to review it before sending it out to
PSEG.

Thanks,
Fred


I'm thinking about a Nissan Pathfinder.  Then I think about just keeping my
money and driving what I have.


I never got the second set could you send it again.


pls print.  thanks df
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 03/12/2001 08:03 AM ---------------------------
From:	Susan Scott/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/09/2001 03:05 PM
To:	Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject:	Red Rock open season

See the attached.  The notice assumes Calpine's bid is not binding.


Barry,
 The attached document appears to be in final form.  It is ready to be put on
ENA stationary and sent to Crestar.  If you are going to do this please send
me a hard copy of what is sent out.  As written, the document does not need
to be signed by either party.  If you want the ENA confirm desk to send it
out, please let me know and I will forward it to them to send, however, in
each case, the document will not need to be signed by either party.  Please
advise.


Susan,

Sorry about the previous attempt.  This is the list of counterparties.  We need to know if we can disclose to third parties that we have traded with them and the volumes associated with the trades.  Thanks for your help.  Call me if you need clarification.

Thanks for your help,
Jennifer Adams

Waste Management Inc.
Georgia Pacific Corp
Casella Waste Systems Inc.
US Gypsum
Inland Paper and Packaging
Rand Whitney Counterboard
National Gypsum Company
Norampac
Atlantic Packaging Products, ltd.
General Mills
Papier Mason
Media News
Times Mirror
Macro Media
Knight Ridder
Media General
New York Times
Tembec Industries
Pacifica Paper
Rock Ten
Conagra Energy Svcs
Frito Lay
Lin Packaging
Dial
National Banc of Canada
Master Packaging
Sodra
James Hardie NV
Appleton Paper
Merita Bank
Repap New Brunswick
Boise Cascade
Caima
Irving Pulp and Paper
UPM Kymmene
Proctor & Gamble

Jennifer Adams
Manager, Corporate Development
Enron Corp.
1400 Smith Street
Houston, TX  77002
Tele:  713/853-3919
Fax:  713/646-4043


Just wanted to let you know I haven't forgotten you. All our traders and
schedulers have been in a meeting this afternoon, and as soon as they got out
the frenzy of trading and scheduling began again. I'm going to give things a
minute to settle down, and then ask around as to how people would like their
Livelink training.

I'll get back to you soon.

Thanks,
Kate


Gentlemen,

      The $13,529 congestion charge on the 18th that was allocated to the stCA desk has been split between both of your desks though the change will not show up until the month end flash reports.  Look for it then but trust me it has been changed.  In the future I will ask about HA congestion charges that show up on stCA to make sure they are warranted.  Any questions let me know.

later,

Darren

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Reyes, Jim
Sent:	Friday, August 24, 2001 12:31 PM
To:	Cavanaugh, Darren
Cc:	Mallory, Chris; Williams III, Bill
Subject:	8/18/01 HA Congestion

Darren,

RT and stCal desks have decided to divide the congestion cost between the two desks.  We need a manual entry to adjust this.

Jim


Oregon Law Journal June 2001: The site is up waiting for you: Many new
articles, recent cases, case summaries, federal court news, Attorney General
news, US Supreme Court cases including medical marijuana, two Texas lawyers
have an article on Telemedicine, (issues that are similar to
multijurisdictional law practice issues), Steve Bass from PC World is back,
writing about Web Privacy matters,? articles on recent employment cases and
on? recent land use cases appear and much? more is on the site.? A new
feature is our archive directory by article title - look that over.

For our Washington lawyers we have a new site:
Washington Law Journal at: http://www.washingtonlawjournal.com

Here is the link for the Oregon Law Journal:
http://www.oregonlawjournal.com


Who is Toronto Dominion (Texas), Inc.?

From: Sara Shackleton on 11/14/2000 11:42 AM CST
To: Treasa Kirby/LON/ECT@ECT, Rod Nelson/LON/ECT@ECT, Marcus Von Bock Und
Polach/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Toronto Dominion (Texas), Inc. (EXISTING ISDA MASTER AGREEMENT)

Treasa:

Your diagram identifies "Toronto-Dominion Bank, Toronto".
Are we using the 12/18/98 ISDA agreement as a model for a new master ISDA
agreement?  Did the bank change its name?

I'll wait for the term sheet and the draft TD confirms which you mentioned in
your email.

Sara


Dear Ken,
 I have been told that you will not have time to meet with me, prior to Mr
Fox dinner in New York.
I have to be in N.Y., anyhow, so let me know if you feel like having a night
cap, after your dinner.

 Here is some relevant information regarding the participants at the dinner
and their interests in Mexico.

 Best regards, jaime____

 - Alatorre.doc


Hi Leslie:

The proposal that ENA submitted to Peevey/Freeman includes a proposal to
reduce demand by 400 MWs if the state implements financial incentives for
such reductions (i.e., if the state is willing to pay, say, 7 cents/kwh to
"produce," it ought to willing to pay 7 cents to "reduce.")  That proposal
was distributed to the usual, company wide email distribution list last week
when it was submitted.  We can discuss further on the phone call this morning.

Best,
Jeff

	Leslie Lawner
	02/13/2001 06:53 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Ken Lay promise

Apparently there are rumors that Ken Lay promised to make some kind of
investment in California when he was talking to folks in the state ($300
million in DSM?)  Do any of you know what this commitment might be?  Sandy
needs to be filled in on this.  Let me know as soon as you can.


Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490

----- Forwarded by Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT on 06/16/2000 02:24 PM -----

	Debra Perlingiere
	06/16/2000 02:20 PM

		 To: don.nicolson.promark.ab.ca
		 cc:
		 Subject:

June 16, 2000

Don Nicolson
Forest Oil Corporation

Dear Mr. Nicolson:

Attached for your review is a draft of a Master Firm Purchase/Sale Agreement
between Enron North America Corp. and Forest Oil Corporation.

Please do not hesitate to contact me  with your questions and or comments
regarding the Agreement.
Best  Regards,

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Jim,

Thanks. I shall call him.

Vince

James D Steffes@EES
09/20/2000 09:39 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Presentation to faculty and students at Berkeley

Vince --

Please feel free to also call Jeff Dasovich (415-782-7822) in our San
Fransisco office.  He has been very involved in the California market
discussions and presented before FERC during their field hearings.  He knows
the profs you are meeting with and has some great insights into our positions.

Jeff also attended Berkeley as an undergrad and is now attending their
B-school in the evenings.

Thanks.

Jim Steffes

---------------------- Forwarded by James D Steffes/HOU/EES on 09/20/2000
09:33 AM ---------------------------
From: Steven J Kean@ENRON on 09/20/2000 09:21 AM
Sent by: Steven J Kean@ENRON
To: Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Elizabeth
Linnell/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Presentation to faculty and students at Berkeley

Maureen -- please send Vince my California testimony and the talking point
presentation for Jeff Skilling at the National Press Club.
Eliz-- keep Vince on the distribution list for the documents we are
generating now to repond to the California situation.
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 09/20/2000 09:18 AM -----

	Vince J Kaminski@ECT
	09/18/2000 01:26 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Charlene Jackson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Celeste Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ashley Baxter/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Presentation to faculty and students at Berkeley

Steve,

I am a lead recruiter at the University of California at Berkeley for
Enron Analyst/Associate program.

I contacted several friends who work at Berkeley and received an invitation
from one of them to make a presentation at the weekly Faculty Seminar
of the Dept. of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research.

The students and faculty members from the business school will be also
invited.

Berkeley in general, and Department of Industrial Engineering and Operations
Research in
particular, are important centers of academic research on electricity markets
(S. Oren works very closely with Severin Borenstein).

My presentation will focus on the Analyst/Associate program. I shall  also
have
an opportunity to discuss the power markets in California (I expect many
questions) before many experts who are very  important to shaping
public opinion and regulatory agenda.

Please, let me know who in you group could help me in preparing this
presentation
and in presenting  Enron's point of view in a more effective way.

Vince

FYI. The name of my friend who invited me:

Shmuel S. Oren, Professor
Dept. of Industrial Engineering
and Operations Research
4117 Etcheverry Hall
University of California
Berkeley, CA 94720-1777


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 04/26/2001 05:24 PM -----

	Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate
	04/26/2001 05:05 PM

		 To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/ENRON@enronXgate,
Debbie R Brackett/ENRON@enronXgate, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Cynthia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, Enron Europe
Global CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Claudia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, William S
Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa Lees/ENRON@enronXgate, Juana
Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT,
Karen O'Day/ENRON@enronXgate, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Kelly
Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian Lindsay/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, EOL Call Center@ECT, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Amy
Heffernan/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Molly LaFuze/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Danny Clark/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Teresa
Mandola/ENRON@enronXgate, Bill Kyle/ENRON@enronXgate, Amber Ebow/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL approvals, 04-26-01

Please see attached.


Based on our discussion last week, here is some information under the
Lackawanna letter of credit.  Under the letter of credit, the stated amount
is increased $4.5 million upon receipt from the trustee of notification of
the Completion Date.  Completion Date is defined in the LC as in the
Indenture.  However, this definition is exactly the same as used in the
subordinated loan agreement.  I have attached my analysis of the requirements
for the Completion Date under the Loan Agreement.

Completion requires, among other things, the production within a 24 day
period of 3,000 units with certain quality specifications.  Approval of these
specifications must be made by the independent engineer.  To date, we have
taken a wait and see approach regarding completion.  Please review and advise
on your thoughts on strategy going forward.  Obviously, we want to hold them
to the letter of the agreement.  The LC expires on June 30 and it does not
appear that under the loan agreement that we are required to fund after the
expiration of the letter of credit.

If you need the pertinent documents, I have them in my office.

.


Hi Kate!
I got your voice mail this morning (I was out sick yesterday).  I did a
search based on the info you left in your vmail and got deal #531742.  Is
this the deal you were looking for?  If so, this confirmation letter has been
executed by Avista Energy, Inc.  Would you like a faxed copy of this confirm?


Document attached.
This is the second of two emails.  See message for the first email.
 - SPP 01 Rstmt doc6 Nov18c2.DOC


Claudia


Tana Jones is coordinating execution of the NDA with London.  We did not work
on the MOU, so I don't know where it's at or who is handling getting it
executed.  Please contact Tana Jones directly to coordinate these efforts.

Regards,

Leslie

	David P Dupre
	12/07/2000 11:42 AM

		 To: Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Richard Sage/LON/ECT@ECT, Craig Chaney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Denis
O'Connell/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: NDA and MOU for ERisk

Leslie:

Thanks for your email.

If you would, please coordinate this NDA with Richard and Denis in London
so that both the NDA and the MOU are signed.

Afterwards, they could both be finalized and sent via FedEx (or fax if Steve
is amenable to that)
 either from your office or Richard Sage's office by tomorrow to Steve Wagner
in New York so that ERisk
 may have it signed and returned to you before our meeting on Tuesday Dec 12.

Thanks for your prompt attention to this.

David

Leslie Hansen
12/07/2000 08:52 AM
To: "Steven Wagner" <swagner@erisks.com>@ENRON
cc: Craig Chaney/HOU/ECT@ECT, David P Dupre/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Reciprocal Confidentiality Agreement

Steve:

All of your proposed changes are acceptable.  I'm finalizing the document as
per the attached and will have it sent to you for execution after I have had
it executed on my end.  To whom should I send the execution document?  In the
interests of time, I suggest that we exchange fax copies.

Regards,

Leslie Hansen
713/853-6121

	"Steven Wagner" <swagner@erisks.com>
	12/06/2000 04:41 PM

		 To: <leslie.hansen@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Reciprocal Confidentiality Agreement

 - NDAEnronCredit.doc


Heather -- Darren and Donna were left off of Bob's e:mail, can you set up
times with them?

---------------------- Forwarded by Kathryn Bussell/HOU/ECT on 11/06/2000
03:40 PM ---------------------------

Bob M Hall@ENRON
11/02/2000 05:58 PM
To: Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, George D Smith/NA/Enron@ENRON, Randall L
Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Eiben/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rita
Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Kathryn Bussell/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Job Survey and Matching

Just to give you a head up.  Katherine will be getting with each of you next
week to
work on a new job survey and matching process for HR to do a salary
comparison.

This should be like the one done last year.

we only have till Thursday of next week to get this finished.

thanks

bob


Dear Andy

I work with TechSpan, Inc. and we have been very excited over Enron's
initiatives in the e-commerce arena and wanted to explore opportunities of
working as a Strategic e-commerce development & integration partner. We plan
to achieve this through an unique methodology which couples high technical
competency and low cost structure for the Energy Industry.

You would be pleased to note that such a strategic partnership and our
unique process could save Enron close to 50% on development & integration
costs and yet enhance competitive advantage on various e-commerce
initaitives. As an example, we have established  credentials of completing
projects within $ 1.0 Million as against the projected $ 2.0 M for the same
projects (based on proposals from Big Consulting firms).

I see a good amount of synergy in a partnership with Enron , given our
experience in the e-business development space with over 600 consultants in
our Strategic Sourcing , Application/B2B Integration , Content Management,
CRM and Wireless Practices. Our competencies are built around the solutions
of leading e-commerce vendors such as MOAI, Ariba, eBreviate, Webmethods,
TIBCO, Vignette, Interwoven, E.Piphany, Kana, Epicentric, TopTier, BEA ,
etc.

Moreover, our development experience with more than 35
Exchanges/e-Marketplaces including Forest Express, e2Open, RMX/Chevron,
American Petroleum Exchange, etc and Fortune companies such as Chevron,
Goldman Sachs, Barclays Bank, Meryl Lynch, HP, Cisco has honed our skills
around the business processes in the e-marketplaces, on-line colloboration,
supply chain automation, e-procurement, e-sourcing, etc.

Andy, We would like to understand your technology objectives and see if we
can bring additional value to you through our expertise. I would like to set
up a telephone call next week with you for about 30 minutes, share our value
proposition with you and agree on steps to explore areas where TechSpan can
add value.
A brief profile of our company and capabilities are detailed below for your
kind perusal. I look forward to our discussions on synergies and mutual
value propositions.

Thanks and regards,

Arvind Ramanathan
Business Development Manager
TechSpan Inc.

Tel:   408. 530.5570
Cell:  408. 828.6391

www.techspan.com

      TechSpan Profile:

 1) TechSpan is a Goldman-Sachs venture funded ebusiness consulting services
company with global HQ in Sunnyvale, CA.
    Other locations are Virginia, New Jersey, and India. We have industry's
leading members in our Board such as
    Mr. Bill Coleman(Chairman & CEO of BEA Systems) apart from members of
Goldman Sachs & Walden International. Our
    Chairman & CEO; Mr. Arjun Malhotra co founded HCL, which is India's
largest IT company.

 2) Into our 28th month of operations, currently with 700 plus people and an
annual revenue run rate of $ 100 million.
    Such a growth in a short span of two years has ranked TechSpan No.1 in
the Indian Big 6 pureplay internet services
    companies, featured in IDC's  analysis, Named finalists in Cisco awards,
ranked on Smart 100 companies,  etc.

 3) TechSpan's focus is providing services in the B2B and B2C ecommerce
space  around the C++ / Java/ BEA Weblogic/J2EE and
    Microsoft Technologies

 4) Our understanding of the enterprise wide eCommerce initiatives, Intranet
applications and the Extranet (Buy and Sell
    side) is continuing to add value to our clients like Barclays Bank, HP,
Cisco, Meryll Lynch, Warner Brothers,
    Bloomingdales, Sun, Goldman Sach's etc.

 5) We build, maintain and enhance complete end to end Web based solutions
using the new wave technologies like Java, EJBs,
    Application Servers, J2EE standards etc.

 6) We also re-engineer  Ist generation web technologies (CGI, Coldfusion
etc..) based web applications to the more scalable
    and secure application servers based solutions.

 7) Additionally, our technology alliances with  Webmethods,
Vignette,Vitria, Ariba, Moai, eBreviate, E.piphany, Octane,
    Kana, Interwoven, BEA systems, Gemstone, Remedy, Continuus, Tantau opens
up a totally new dimension in deploying and
    integrating  packaged software applications.

 8) The combination of our development labs in the US, and India can offer
round the clock new development or applications
    maintenance/ QA support.


Gerald - I know you've told me this before, but I didn't put it in my calendar.  What time and where is tomorrow's telephone depo? Thanks.


Tickets are free.   I don't think we'll need binoculars-seats are on floor.
Enjoyed helping you over the week-end-that's what friends are for-at least
where we came from.  The flowers you sent me are beautiful .. All of my
favorites-gerber daisies and liliies.  You didn't  to do that with all of the
furniture you gave me.  By the way-are your legs killing you.  My calves hurt
like hell-think it's from going up and down the stairs barefoot on Saturday.
I think your decorator was a little disappointed in all of the progress we
made.-he probably thought you would want to hire help.  Can't believe he
didn't say anything about all of the beautiful glas syou have.  Hey-we may
want to thin about putting one of your big mirrors in your purple/black
bedroom next to the TV hutch-nearthat corner instead of in the purple/green
room.


Please see note below from Maggie Matheson.

adr
---------------------- Forwarded by Audrey Robertson/ET&S/Enron on 08/31/2000
02:10 PM ---------------------------

Maggie Matheson
08/31/2000 02:07 PM
To: Audrey Robertson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Sheila Nacey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lynn Blair/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jan  Moore,
John Buchanan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Linda  Trevino, Toby Kuehl/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Order 637 Internet Training

Audrey:

This invitation was sent to the Market Services Group, will you please
forward to your group and let them know that they are welcome to attend any
of these training sessions.

Thanks,

Maggie
---------------------- Forwarded by Maggie Matheson/ET&S/Enron on 08/31/2000
01:53 PM ---------------------------

Maggie Matheson
08/31/2000 01:51 PM
To: Jan  Moore, Linda  Trevino
cc: Sheila Nacey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ramona Betancourt/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Legale
Black/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Draemer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tammy
Jaquet/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Toby Kuehl/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Gerry
Medeles/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Maggie Matheson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lynn
Blair/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julia White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John
Buchanan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Order 637 Internet Training

We will be conducting three training sessions on Friday September 1st.   The
training will be conducted in EB4102  at 1:00, 2:00 or 3:00 PM .

The training will consist of a demo of the following new FERC Order 637
internet sites:

   Affiliated Marketer Info
 Organizational Charts
 Corporate Structure

   Capacity
 Operationally Available Capacity
 Unsubscribed Capacity
 Design Capacity

   Transactional Reporting
 Firm
 Interruptible
 Capacity Release
 Special Terms


here are all the power trades on enrononline..


The following file contains a graphical view of the North American Gas
average deal count by Trader and Product for EOL. This information is for
comparative analysis only.  Do not update links when opening this file.

If you have any questions regarding this breakout, please let me know .

Matt Motsinger
EnronOnline
713-853-5221


Dan,

Please find below details of Phy Gas deals with GTC agreements:

Deal Date: 6/01/01
Deal No: VE1156 / 826162
Buyer: El Paso Electric Company
Seller: ENA
Start Date: 1/01/02
End Date: 12/31/02
Firm
Volume: 10,000 / day
Price: 3.75000
Delivery Point: El Paso Natural Gas Co. - San Juan Basin, Blanco (Non-Bondad
Gas)

Please let me know if you need any more details.

Thanks,
Richard
x54886


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 10/13/2000
05:09 PM ---------------------------
 Office of the Chairman
From: Office of the Chairman@ENRON on 10/05/2000 07:55 AM
To: ClickatHome mailout
cc:
Subject: A Computer and Internet Connection for You and Your Family

As you know, technology is critical to Enron; it drives our success and will
continue to do so in the future. Technology has helped Enron create new
businesses like Enron Broadband Services and Enron Net Works, and it is
responsible for applications such as EnronOnline and EnronCredit.com.  You,ve
seen what technology can do at work.  Now we want you and your family to
realize its benefits at home.

With that in mind, we are excited to let you know that we are introducing the
ClickAtHome
program, which will give each employee a computer for use at home. Where
technology permits, we will also subsidize an Internet connection. With the
click of a mouse, a home computer plus Internet access will put a world of
Internet knowledge at your family,s fingertips.

We have just signed an agreement with Dell Computer Corporation to provide
the computer hardware. We wanted to let you know about the program now in
case you and your family were considering the purchase or upgrade of a home
computer or Internet connection in the next few months. The scope of
ClickAtHome includes the following:

? Basic package: Dell desktop computer with a high-speed processor, floppy
disk drive, mouse, speakers, monitor, modem, CD-ROM drive and Windows 2000
software. Employees will have the option to receive a subsidized Internet
connection, including broadband, where commercially available.
? Participation: This program will be available to active regular full-time
and regular part-time employees of Enron and its wholly owned subsidiaries;
however, employees of some Enron companies (Portland General Electric, EOTT,
Enron Facility Services) may not be able to participate due to legal,
accounting, tax, labor or business reasons.  Eligibility includes being
employed at the time of implementation.
? Timing: U.S. employee sign-up will begin in early 2001, with delivery of
the equipment and Internet connection to follow shortly thereafter.  Delivery
of equipment to participating non-U.S. employees is targeted for late 2001.

Details about this program are still being finalized.  To address some of
your initial questions, we,ve posted a question-and-answer document on
http://clickathome.enron.com.  We will schedule an eSpeak session in the near
future where you will have an opportunity to ask questions. Or, you can
submit your questions and comments to ClickAtHome@enron.com.

We are excited to extend our investment in technology to you and your
family.  We believe this program takes communication at Enron to a new level
by creating endless possibilities for you to experience and participate in
the broadband Internet revolution. It is just another reason why we believe
Enron is a great place to work.


Sheila,

If I were starting over again, there are a few things I would change.  First,
the development fee as presented in this draft doesn't work.  Second, I would
put all the put/call details in the llc agreement.  Third, I would make the
put/call available anytime GE agreed to it.  The development fee has been
discussed generally, but not fully vetted with Herman.

Kay


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  ? 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Crude     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/crude73.pdf
Natural Gas     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/ngas73.pdf

Dec WTI/Brent Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/clz-qoz.pdf
Dec Heat Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/heatcrack.pdf
Dec Gas Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/gascrack.pdf
Dec/May Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hoz-hok.pdf
Jan/Feb Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hof-hog.pdf
Dec Gas/Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/huz-hoz.pdf
Feb Gas/Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hug-hog.pdf
Dec/Mar Unlead Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/huz-huh.pdf

Nat Gas Strip Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/StripmatrixNG73.pdf
Nat Gas Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixNG73.pdf

Crude and Products Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixCL73.pdf

Shoulder Month Trade
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/ShoulderMoTrade.pdf
Scott Mollner Recomendation
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/recom11-15-01.pdf


Sara,
 I just joined Enron about 1 month ago and am just getting use to the
process.  Could you start the ISDA process with EnSight Resources.  The
address and phone number and contact information are below in the John Suttle
memo.  Thank you very much.

Mark
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Smith/Corp/Enron on 04/20/2000 09:49
AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Mark Smith                           04/07/2000 02:26 PM

To: John Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jennifer Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Credit Set-up for EnSight Resources

John,
 Could you set up EnSight Resources an account with Enron, so they can
transact some NYMEX NG fixed price swaps with us in the near future.  Karen
Anthony is the CFO and she can provide you any financials that you need to
get them set-up.

The address is:

Karen Anthony
CFO
EnSight Resources, LLC
333 Texas St, Suite 1175
Shreveport, LA 71101
318-429-2226

Thanks for your help in this matter.

Mark Smith


Ms.  Arnold called looking for the IF today.  She gets a much better response
out of me than you do.


Energy Committee:

Here are the minutes from last week's EC meeting, along with Mukesh's 'High
Reliability Option under RTP tariff filing with CPUC' memo, the 'proposed
outline for the SVMG / NRDC joint report', and the 'return on investment for
Dr. Barbara Barkovich'.

 - NRDC-SVMG Rpt Outline for EC.doc
 - Energy Committee Meeting Minutes 7.11.doc
 - Memo to pge 071101.doc
 - return on investment for Dr Barkovich 1st half of 2001.doc
 - return on investment for Dr Barkovich 1st half of 2001.doc


Steve -- I received your note that you had received Dan's comments.  I
thought it made sense, in any case, to pass on a few comments; Dan probably
had the same thoughts, but just in case here they are:

Section 2(a):  the parenthetical "including the transmission of electric
energy in interstate commerce that is sold at retail", while technically a
correct fix, is still a little troubling.   Just as everyone is someone's
native load customer, all electricity is ultimately sold "at retail."
Nonetheless, this hasn't stopped FERC from concluding that it lacks
jurisdiction over the transmission component of bundled retail service.  The
possibility that this ambiguity could be exploited would be avoided by using
the "transmission component of bundled retail service" language, and
including separate definitions of bundled and unbundled retail service
(rather than "quick and dirty" approach in new section 205(g).

This approach would also get rid of the possible ambiguity in new section
205(g)(1)(A), which requires the filing of a schedule for the "transmission
of electric energy... that is separate from the rates...applicable to the
sale of electric energy and to local distribution."  It is not abundantly
clear that the filed rate schedule must be for the transmission component of
unbundled retail service, although that seems to be the intent of the
drafters.

Section 205(g) uses the "not unduly discriminatory or preferential basis"
standard.  That language, as with the existing Federal Power Act language,
can be interpreted as permitting native load service to maintain its
priority status in all situations, on the basis that it is not "undue"
discrimination to favor those who paid for the system or the other usual
defenses of this approach.  Language similar to that we have worked on
previously, which makes it absolutely clear that no native load preference
is permitted, would eliminate this possible result.

Similarly, it would be useful, in section 205(g)(5), to make it clear that
the transmission of bundled service must be reserved and scheduled on
exactly the same basis as unbundled service; as written, this provision
might be interpreted as not so requiring.

If Enron accepts the preference for "firm wholesale and retail customers" in
Section 205(g)(6), it should revise the language to make it clear that this
is a "one-time" preference, and that, with respect to future service,
transmission customers are to be placed on equal footing.  This might be
done be including a specific cut-off, such as "Any such rule shall cease to
be applicable no later than one year after the date such rule takes effect."

Section 2(f) permits transmission rates to be capped at the rate set by the
State commission.  This approach leaves open the option for States which
have, or which, as part of the establishment of retail competition, to set
transmission rates at a higher than cost-justified level, and to subsidize
the sale price of their owned generation or purchased power from that
subsidy.  Such an approach would put marketers at a severe disadvantage.  I
suggest including a prohibition against such subsidization.

Adam Wenner
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.
1455 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20004-1008
(202) 639-6533
(202) 639-6604 (fax)
awenner@velaw.com


Kathy/Brian,

As I'm sure you know we are trying to determine what is causing the Canadian
VAR to be so high.  One possible cause that we would like your help
investigating is the Curve Codes that are being loaded in the position files
that are manually loaded into the system each night.  It is my understanding
that positions will be correct even if the curves loaded are spelled
incorrectly. However, incorrect curve names will result in the positions not
being captured in the VAR calculation.  Please verify that all the curves are
spelled correctly in all position files.

Please give me a call if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Robin


Bruce,
It does not sound like we will be using the Enron Brazil Power Holdings'
entity any longer to hold these shares.
We will need to know the entity and work with Legal to get the proper
documentation necessary to open up an account at the prime brokers.
Sara is legal and we work with her team to open up authorized new accounts.
Thanks for the update.
Sheila
---------------------- Forwarded by Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT on 12/08/2000 03:35
PM ---------------------------

Bruce Harris@ENRON
12/08/2000 11:31 AM
To: Robert H George/NA/Enron@Enron, Kay Young/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Dan Boyle/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lynn Aven/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe
Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron, Kent Castleman/NA/Enron@Enron, Bruce
Harris/NA/Enron@Enron, Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward E
Graham/SA/Enron@Enron, Rick Hopkinson/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey E
Sommers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Next steps with Copel shares

Robert and Kay, thanks for all your work on getting the shares moved out of
Brazil and into the parent CayCos.  I understand that by sometime early next
week the physical ADR certificates will be returned by BONY to the Enron
vault.

Here is what we now need to do:

1. We are going to need to send one certificate back to BONY and split it
into three new certificates.  Two certificates will be for approximately
1.25M shares each, the balance for about 5M shares.

2. We need to form a new CayCo and sell or otherwise transfer (capital
split?) the two 1.25M tranches to this NewCo.  This needs to happen next week.

3.  Pending Dan Boyle's structuring efforts and an affirmative Corp. decision
(supervised by Joe Kishkill), the two existing CayCos which now own the Copel
shares will be sold into Whitewing Fund.  That means about 12.5M shares will
go to Whitewing and the certificates will remain in the vault.  This would
happen last week of the year--if it happens (there are actually about
15,443,000 total ADRs--I am approximating in this email).

4. The NewCo shares will remain outside this structure entirely. We will need
to put one tranche of 1.25M into a brokerage account--Sheila at this point we
will bring you in for assistance (again, hopefully next week).

5. Robert--we need to work out soon with Sheila, Skadden,and BONY to
establish an efficient mechanism to convert the full 1.25M share certificate
to unrestricted ADRs absent and prior an immediate buyer(s)--or we need to
figure out foolproof mechanics for constantly reissuing new certificates for
every small sale.  We will then be looking for effective points to sell these
1.25M shares--and again, Joe Kishkill will provide price/volume targets
(execution via Gary Hickerson's group who has not yet been informed).  In 3
months time, we will repeat the process for the other 1.25M tranche.

Robert--please call me so we can determine: (a) how to set up NewCo/transfer
shares, and (b) how to work the 1.25M "unrestriction" with BONY and Skadden.

Regards,  Bruce
713-853-0950


Given the deterioration in outlook for several of the Nepco projects--especially Kendall, Jenks, and Linden there are significant potential losses that may need to be recognized this quarter.  I wanted to make sure there was full understanding of the situation and discussion regarding our approach.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayslett, Rod
Sent:	Tuesday, October 30, 2001 8:31 AM
To:	Lydecker Jr., Richard
Subject:	FW: NEPCO Earnings

What is the purpose of this meeting?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Drummond, Christine
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 2:46 PM
To:	Colwell, Wes; Hayslett, Rod; Marlow, Keith; Lydecker Jr., Richard
Cc:	Campos, Kathy; Tijerina, Shirley; Petry, Norma
Subject:	NEPCO Earnings

	Meeting has been scheduled per Richard Lydecker
	Thursday, November 1, 2001
	9:00-10:00 am
	EB3305 - Wes's Office
	Subject: NEPCO Earnings
	Attendees: Richard Lydecker; Wes Colwell, Rod Hayslett, Keith Marlow (Pending Availability)


Tom/Kevin,

In the development of the 1.5 MW WTG Statistical Process Control (SPC)
reporting tool we have some additional questions regarding the data which
comes to us from VisuPro.   In the attached spreadsheet you will find a
listing of most of the channels which VisuPro uses to record data.  With some
exceptions, each channel should correspond to a transducer on the turbine.
The channel name and number can be found in the left columns as they are
presented in VisuPro.  The "Alias" column is my attempt to better understand
the channel and put a more meaningful label on the channel for presentation
to the field personnel.  Wherever there is a blank it means that I do not
have a good explanation of the channel and need more information.

You can ignore the grey shading.  It is just an indicator as to whether the
particular channel is currently included in the existing version of our SPC
analytic.  The more interesting column is the "Include" column which is our
future plan regarding inclusion of the particular channel in the next
revision of the analytic.

Please do provide comments regarding simplified label names.  Also please
note that I need further clarification on cells with comments inserted (look
for the red traingle in the top right corner of 3 of the cells).

The other thing I would really like to have is a picture, or drawing, of the
exact location of each of the transducers we are planning on including.  This
would give myself and the field personnel great insight as to what the
measurements really represent.

Thanks,
Hollis


Don:

Attached are my responses to DPL's environmental questions on Wheatland.
Additional input from Dave Kellermeyer and Chris Norris will be provided
later today.

Thanks.

Gus


Steve / Julia, if this is OK, will you please forward to all Market Services
members.
thanks
KH

Pursuant to our conversation today, we will implement the following change in
the way Market Services allocates the California delivery points:

Historically we have allocated the border as an area.  Effective 9/18/00
until further notice, we will allocate the border by individual points.

If SoCal windows TW down to a number less than the standard 750,000 MMBtu/d,
then we will allocate shipper noms down to the window total.
PGE and Mojave points will be individually allocated to their capacities as
well.

If the opportunity arises whereby gas allocated at Needles can be moved to
Topock or Mojave, then Market Services should work with the Shippers to
accommodate their needs.

The West of Thoreau area should not exceed the 1,090,000 MMBtu/d capacity
constraint.

Any questions can be directed to Steve January, TK Lohman, or Darrell
Schoolcraft.


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 04/12/2001
09:51 AM ---------------------------
From: Veronica Espinoza/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/12/2001 09:38 AM
To: Janie Aguayo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron, Derek
Bailey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean Bell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Patricia Boulanger/CAL/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie
Brewer/NA/Enron@Enron, Lesli Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Celeste
Cisneros/NA/Enron@Enron, Sharon Crawford/CAL/ECT@ECT, Richard
Deming/NA/Enron@Enron, Russell Diamond/ENRON@enronXgate, Cindy
Feldman/CAL/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Veronica
Gonzalez/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Walter
Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate, Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam
Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol
McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Nidia Mendoza/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Bianca Ornelas/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie
Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Linda Sietzema/CAL/ECT@ECT, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ellen
Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON, Melinda Whalen/CAL/ECT@ECT, Tiffany
Williams/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Credit Report--4/12/01


All

The group has been doing a great job with deal entry - with a few
exceptions.  I just want to go over a some basics:

Make sure your price index is appropriate for the delivery point.  If you
enter a delivery point of Malin, Capt Jack, or COB, your price index should
reference NW1,  not NW3, NW2, etc.   If it's a Day-Of (Hour-Ahead) deal, make
sure the price index reflects that, i.e., it has the "HA" in the index.

If the deal is such that the PX is doing the import/export for us (title to
the power changes hands at a tie point, versus in a load zone such as NP, SP
or ZP), the counterparty should be California Power Exchange - Scheduling
Coordinator (CalPX-SC).  This lets people know EPMI is not the
importer/exporter of the power - the PX is responsible for that.

If you buy/sell from/to the PX @ NP, SP or ZP, the counterparty is simply
California Power Exchange (CalPX).

If the deal is due to a real-time cut, the counterparty is California PX -
Time Removal.  The price should an ISO-based index and it should always be
either ISOHANP15inc/dec, or ISOHASP15inc/dec.  Currently there are some
messages (in Deal Entry and Deal Blotter) tied to the Time-Removal
counterparty that indicate the price should be either ISOHANP15 or ISOSP15
(without the Inc/Dec ).  For now, ignore that message and make sure the index
included Inc/Dec.  When IT releases a new version of Deal Entry and Deal
Blotter, we'll be able to better manage these "checks".  Also, even though
the index should be based on the ISO for these types of deals, the delivery
point should still be the actual delivery point, such as PV, 4C, etc.

It's important these deals are entered correctly.  If they're not, the P/L
that is reported to mgt is incorrect - and it will be until I come thru to
settle.

Thanks.

Brett


I just checked for most recent charges to AMEX and the
balance is 1701.13...charges are as follows
$433 New Orleans tickets
$110 -kq dinner at sullivan's
$83 work event will expense
$118.82- Leapfrog game for Denise
$247.32-kay cell phone
$80.65 flowers for Amy Reeves
$77 kay dinner with friends
$400 Downing Street ????????????-didn't you cancel that locker?
a few other misc items that I can expense
I turned in about $1100 in work related expense today
kq


Pursuant to your request, here is the GE Turbine Agreement (in Word)
that is the basis for the break-out agreements.

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:  Lindo, Jacqueline E.
> Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 9:59 AM
> To: 'kay.mann@enron.com'
> Cc: Pipitone, Paul; Cobb, Chris
> Subject: Gas Turbine Purchase Agreement.DOC
>
>
>  Attached please find a clean copy of Version 6 of the GE Turbine
> Agreement.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  <<Gas Turbine Purchase Agreement.DOC>>
 - Gas Turbine Purchase Agreement.DOC


market_relations@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:

Dear NYISO Market Participants:

On December 11 - 13, 2001 the NYISO will present NYMOC in the Lone Star
State. We've just posted the course on our web site at

http://www.nyiso.com/services/training/cinfo/index.html

This course is similar to NYMOCs run in the Albany NY area, except that it
does not include Billing and Accounting details. The program will address
the latest system updates, however, and rigorously covers all marketplace
topics.

The course will be conducted at the Hyatt Regency Houston, 1200 Louisiana
Street, Houston, Texas, from 8:30 am  Tuesday December 11 until 3:00 pm
Thursday December 13. If you're interested, we suggest you register early
as we expect a healthy turn-out. In order to get a realistic count, there
will be a $300 charge for no-shows, or for cancellations not made by 12:00
noon Monday, December 3.

Please call Customer Relations at (518) 356-6060, if you have any questions
regarding the course, or Debbie Doyle at (518) 356-6274 regarding
registrations.


Hi, Anna!

I apologize for not calling you today, but things got pretty hectic and I misplaced your message. Besides the termination of the Enron Corp. guaranty guaranteeing obligations of Enron North America Corp., please provide me with a list of the corporate certificates you need.  This will help me in having everything signed that you need.

Thanks!

Marie

Marie Heard
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron North America Corp.
Phone:  (713) 853-3907
Fax:  (713) 646-3490
marie.heard@enron.com


no problem.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Grigsby, Mike
Sent:	Wednesday, January 02, 2002 3:05 PM
To:	Neal, Scott
Subject:	Lakeside CC

My good friend, Joe Knauth, is trying to join Lakeside and needs to put some recommendation letters together.  Would you mind if he called you to discuss the possibility of you writing one?  I will tell you all about him when you get a chance.

Grigsby


Hi everyone.

Please rsvp to me by tomorrow if you will be attending the party on Saturday.

If you plan on attending, please let me know what dish you will bring.

Thanks!

Shirley


Hi again.

Here is the consent to assignment which I believe is ready to go.  The only
changes I made was adding the requirement to give notice of the financing in
3 (f), and making the release of WestLB specific to these turbines (1(b)).

I will bring signature pages tomorrow, and will forward the override letter
this evening.

Please let me know if you have any questions or comments.

Thanks,

Kay


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Bronstein, Mara
Sent:	Monday, October 08, 2001 7:15 AM
To:	Miller, Stephanie; Tycholiz, Barry; Ward, Kim S (Houston); Polsky, Phil; Whitt, Mark; Lucci, Paul T.; Harrison, Tyrell
Subject:	Hot List

Just a reminder.  Please fix your parts on the hot list and send them back to me.
Thanks,
Mara


I'm out on Monday.

I didn't sell any gas for the 1st through the 3rd.

Lone Star is doing some pigging for the 4th, 5th, and 6th and its going to have and impact on our supply.  Kevin has been in touch with Cinergy and Williams.

Robin, I don't know if you will be able to sell any gas during the outage.  Check with Mike to see what he wants to do, then check with Kevin to see where the gas is coming in at.  I left the contracts on your desk and I will call you Monday morning.


Practice is absolutely necessary to assure our victory.    So we will have
several practices this week  (Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday... with no
drinking and a curfew on Friday) and may cancel the scrimmage to schedule in
more practices.

We will have a practice tonight at 7pm at Memorial Park.   Let me know if you
can make it.   ext. 37842.

IF you were at last year's scrimmage with the aggie team, this will be at the
same location.   Hopefully, the lights will be on and the fields will be
clear.   If it is raining,  the practise will be canceled.

From downtown, heading West toward 610 on Memorial,   goto Memorial Park and
make a right at the first light.  Take this road up till you see a softball
and soccer field on your right hand side.  This is where we will practice.
Eric please bring a couple of footballs.

If you  goto far, further up the road you will see the golf course on your
left hand side as well as Beck's Prime, etc.

----

Also, Sarah, please bring Gerald to the game.  He helped greatly last year,
and a stand by would be excellent in the event of injury.


I think we should shy away from the 300 MW message.  It's getting in the way
of the positive message, and the math turns out to be a bit "Goreish."
(read: fuzzy)  I found myself wandering down all sorts of blind alleys in my
spin to Dow Jones.  I say we generalize it more.  Something to the effect of
"The price caps send the wrong message to the marketplace.  Whether it's gas
lines in the seventies or bread lines in the old Soviet Union, price caps and
market intervention cause problems."

Mark


1) vegas - mandalay bay (excellent combination of meeting facilities/service/rooms/pool)
2) focus should be on strategy/goals & objectives/understanding each respective business units business & value proposition. It would also be helpful to hear your thoughts on overall strategy, direction, short & long term view re markets & opportunities.
3) should be a combination of work + fun (as a group)
4) bring in key-note speakers - lay, skilling, whalley, delainey, etc.

From:	John J Lavorato/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/02/2001 04:29 PM CDT
To:	Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry Arora/ENRON@enronXgate, Edward D Baughman/ENRON@enronXgate, Sally Beck/ENRON@enronXgate, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Remi Collonges/SA/Enron@Enron, Wes Colwell/ENRON@enronXgate, Derek Davies/CAL/ECT@ECT, Mark Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph Deffner/ENRON@enronXgate, Glen Devries/ENRON@enronxgate, Paul Devries/TOR/ECT@ECT, W David Duran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris H Foster/ENRON@enronXgate, Doug Gilbert-Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Orlando Gonzalez/SA/Enron@Enron, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rogers Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Josey/ENRON@enronXgate, Joe Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron, Kyle Kitagawa/CAL/ECT@ECT, Fred Lagrasta/ENRON@enronXgate, John J Lavorato/ENRON@enronXgate, Eric LeDain/CAL/ECT@ECT, Laura Luce/Corp/Enron@Enron, Thomas A Martin/ENRON@enronXgate, Jonathan McKay/CAL/ECT@ECT, Don Miller/ENRON@enronXgate, Michael L Miller/ENRON@enronXgate, Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT, Jean Mrha/ENRON@enronXgate, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Oxley/ENRON@enronXgate, David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Beth Perlman/ENRON@enronXgate, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Redmond/ENRON@enronXgate, Hunter S Shively/ENRON@enronXgate, Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Swerzbin/ENRON@enronxgate, C John Thompson/ENRON@enronXgate, Carl Tricoli/Corp/Enron@Enron, Barry Tycholiz/NA/Enron@ENRON, Frank W Vickers/NA/Enron@Enron, Brett R Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron, Greg Wolfe/ENRON@enronXgate, Max Yzaguirre/NA/Enron@ENRON, John Zufferli/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:	Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject:

Hello everyone.

In December we decided to kill our planned offsite due to market volatility.  Louise and I would like to get everyone together offsite, probably in late June (once Louise is back from holiday (just kidding)).  I think it's time to go have a little fun with the group driving Enron's success.

I would like suggestions as to:

1)  Where to go.

2)  What should be the focus of the business meetings.

3)  Should we have business meetings or should we do something else (ie. climb a mountain)?  I'm not a strong bid on climbing a mountain.

4)  And any other ideas you have.

In addition I would like to start having staff meetings about once a month.  The first one will be Friday May 11th at 2:30 p.m.  Please add this to your schedule.  I have invited everyone who has P/L responsibility.  Portland, Calgary and Toronto will have to be on Video or Phone conference.

Regards

John


I would like to attend the 10/31 session.  Will the training be in the morning?

Thanks, Kim.

-----Original Message-----
From: Southard, Miranda
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 8:40 AM
To: Watson, Kimberly
Subject: RE: Legal Essentials for Managers Training - August 22, 2001
(Part 2)

Kim,

The only sessions still available are 10/3, 10/17, and 10/31.

Thanks,
Miranda

-----Original Message-----
From: Watson, Kimberly
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 9:32 PM
To: Southard, Miranda
Subject: RE: Legal Essentials for Managers Training - August 22, 2001
(Part 2)

Miranda,

Will it be possible to reschedule my time for this training?  I just learned that I will be out of town on Wednesday.  Do you have any time next week available?  I am sorry for any inconvenience this may cause.

Thank you,

Kim Watson.
X33098

-----Original Message-----
From:	Southard, Miranda
Sent:	Mon 8/20/2001 9:38 AM
To:	Abbott, Larry; Arnold, Jeff; Baker, Lee; Bellard, Dannis; Bisbee, Joanne; Blair, Lynn; Geheb, Robert; Harris, Steven; Jensen, Ruth; Koh, Wendy; Mathews, Greg; Osburn, Frank; Pool, Deelyn; Scott, Donna; Sims, Peggy; Tu, Denis; Watson, Kimberly
Cc:
Subject:	Legal Essentials for Managers Training - August 22, 2001 (Part 2)

Due to the file size of the Legal Essentials for Managers presentation, PART 2 is included in the following attachment.

To open:

*	Double click on the icon below.
*	Click on Save to Disk.
*	Save the file to your H: or C: drive.
*	Go to the "My Computer" icon on your computer desktop.
*	Choose the drive that you saved your file on.
*	Double click on the file named Part 2.ZIP
*	WinZIP software will open and allow you to choose the Powerpoint presentation.
*	Double click on the Powerpoint file to open and then you can print them and/or save them as you wish.

 <<Part 2.ZIP>>
Please contact Miranda Southard at 713-853-6252 if you need assistance in opening the file.

Regards.

Brian Schaffer


John,

He travels periodically to
Houston. I may inquire about his next trip.

If you want to speak to him urgently, I can arrange
a phone interview or invite him to Houston.

Vince

-----Original Message-----
From: Lavorato, John
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 10:12 PM
To: Kaminski, Vince J
Subject: RE: A resume

I would love to talk to him.  Does he live in France.  Is it easier for him to work in London. If not I would be happy to do a phone interview.

Please advise

-----Original Message-----
From: Kaminski, Vince J
Sent: Mon 10/22/2001 12:28 PM
To: Lavorato, John
Cc: Collonges, Remi; Zipper, Andy
Subject: A resume

John,

I am not sure if I have already sent you this resume.
Please, take a  look at it. I met Claude a few years ago
and was greatly impressed by him. He may be a good candidate to
work with Andy Zipper.

Vince

<<Claude Philoche.doc>>


Tana:

ANR Pipeline Company is not authorized to trade U.S. power products.  The
other CPs are fine.

ANR is not a current trading partner and is not on my FERC-approved lists.

El Paso Electric Company currently trades in the West pursuant to the WSPP.
Since credit has rated them as a "SC", they cannot trade pursuant to the WSPP
and must instead trade pursuant to the GTCS with collateral.  Accordingly,
this CP must receive an override letter.

Leslie


Check out the latest version of Enron Business Online at home.enron.com.
Click on Publications, then on Enron Business and "Volume 5, 2000".  This
issue, read about what Ken and Jeff could have worn for Halloween costumes!

Also in this issue:

? Enron Broadband Services chips away obstacles;
? DealBench and the art of the paperless deal;
? Global risk managers structure risk even insurers can like;
? Diversity and what you think;
? Enron rescues a giant panda; and
? The Rise School leads lessons in compassion and ABCs.


Yeah, people are already asking me where the chart is already

c

   Kate Symes                02/22/2001 08:14 AM

To: Cara Semperger/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Dow Jones Index Prices - Database Access

Here's what I heard back from Tim. Do you want me to go ahead and save the
Dow Jones data to a shareable file in the meantime?

Kate
---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 02/22/2001 08:17 AM
---------------------------

TIM HEIZENRADER
02/21/2001 05:32 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Julie Sarnowski/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Dow Jones Index Prices - Database Access

I'm not exactly sure where the spreadsheet on our site comes from. Our
preference is to keep everything in our SQL Server database, and many of the
people that you mentioned have read access to that. When Julie Sarnowski gets
back from vacation next week, let's talk about uploading these data to the
server and providing a central facility for the floor.
Tim

   Kate Symes                02/21/2001 03:19 PM

To: Tim Heizenrader/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Cara Semperger/PDX/ECT@ECT

Subject: Dow Jones Index Prices - Database Access

I'd like to inquire about the Dow Jones index price database currently being
maintained by the Fundamentals group. It's come to my attention - by virtue
of the fact that I receive the Dow Jones data each afternoon - that several
people are interested in having access to those figures. I've had requests
from mid-marketing, trading, and scheduling, and am working with IT to put
the NP-15 and SP-15 data online. Cara Semperger, in particular, relies on the
index prices in order to run one of her reports.

I'm wondering if it  would be possible to give these people access to your
database, or maybe if your group would benefit from the data I receive. Your
spreadsheet looks like a compilation of the documents I receive from Dow
Jones, and one might be more useful for an individual or group than the
other. I don't have a preference either way - I'm more than happy to compile
the reports in a separate folder. Please let me know what works best for you.
(I sit in the middle of the room between Tracy Ngo and Val Sabo.)

Thanks,
Kate


Thanks!
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Pendergrass, Cora
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 9:05 AM
To:	Williams, Jason (Trading)
Cc:	Nelson, Doug
Subject:	RE: SITARA 128354 - Jason

This is taken care of.

Thanks!!!

Cora

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Williams, Jason (Trading)
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 8:52 AM
To:	Pendergrass, Cora
Subject:	FW: SITARA 128354 - Jason

Could you check this out for me, I would appreciate it. Thanks.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Doug
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 8:16 AM
To:	Williams, Jason (Trading)
Subject:	SITARA 128354 - Jason

Jason,

SITARA #128354 for the weekend of Sept 8,9,10 2001 at 50,000 / day repurchase from PGLC, needs to have a ($0.01) deduct on the Chi.CG.GDP pricing.
Please update as soon as possible for my settlement and let me know so that I can re-draft.

If needbe, call to discuss.
Thanks,
Doug
x3-0560


Holly:  Please see Christian's message below.  Can you reschedule please?

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 06/05/2001 11:17 AM -----

	Christian Yoder/ENRON@enronXgate
	06/05/2001 11:07 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Schedule meeting with Mark Taylor for Thursday, June 7

3:30 Thursday, Central Time happens to fall exactly to the minute on a time
when I have to be on the phone with Mark Haedicke and Elizabeth Sager.  I
cannot move that time.  Can we go earlier or move it to Friday?  I am trying
to get the cases to you as soon as I can. ----cgy

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Shackleton, Sara
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 7:07 AM
To: Yoder, Christian
Subject: Re: Schedule meeting with Mark Taylor for Thursday, June 7

Christian:  Please mark this time on your calendar to speak with Mark T.:
3:30 Houston/1:30 Portland.  We'll call you.

Will Pat Boylston send over 1 or 2 cases for us to review prior to the call?

Thanks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 06/05/2001 09:00 AM -----

	Holly Keiser@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT 06/05/2001 08:36 AM 	  To: Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT  cc:   Subject: Re: Schedule meeting with Mark Taylor
for Thursday, June 7 << OLE Object: StdOleLink >>

Sorry... you mentioned that in the subject line.

3:30 pm on Thursday.

Holly Keiser
Enron Americas
Legal Department - EB 3887
713-345-7893 (ph)
713-646-3490 (fx)
Holly.Keiser@enron.com

	Sara Shackleton@ECT 06/05/2001 08:19 AM 	  To: Holly
Keiser/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT  cc:   Subject: Re: Schedule
meeting with Mark Taylor for Thursday, June 7 << OLE Object: StdOleLink >>

I'd like to meet Thursday, June 7

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Holly Keiser@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT 06/05/2001 07:34 AM 	  To: Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT  cc:   Subject: Re: Schedule meeting with Mark Taylor
for Thursday, June 7 << OLE Object: StdOleLink >>

Sara -- I've scheduled 3:00 PM following today's Legal/Credit meeting.  If
you prefer later, please let me know.

Thanks!
Holly Keiser
Enron Americas
Legal Department - EB 3887
713-345-7893 (ph)
713-646-3490 (fx)
Holly.Keiser@enron.com

	Sara Shackleton@ECT 06/04/2001 06:12 PM 	   To: Holly
Keiser/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT  cc:   Subject: Schedule meeting
with Mark Taylor for Thursday, June 7

Does Mark have time in the afternoon to meet with me and Christian Yoder
(Portland - 2 hours earlier than CST)?  The topic is "Washington State
PUD's".  I'd schedule about an hour.  Thanks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


The information transmitted by the following e-mail is intended only for the
addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material.  Any
interception, review, retransmission, dissemination, or other use of, or
taking of any action upon this information by persons or entities other than
the intended recipient is prohibited by law and may subject them to criminal
or civil liability.  If you received this communication in error, please
contact us immediately at (202) 785-9100, and delete the communication from
any computer or network system. Although this email and any attachments are
believed to be free of any virus or other defect that might negatively
affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the
responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no
responsibility is accepted by the sender for any loss or damage arising in
any way in the event that such a virus or defect exist.

-------------------------------------------------

All,

Attached please find a transmittal letter, text of SMUD's response, and an
excel file containing the first portion of the attachments to SMUD's
response.  The remainder of the attachments will be sent by separate e-mail.

Adrienne Clair
Morrison and Hecker, LLP
1150 18th Street, NW
Suite 800
Washington, DC  20036
(202) 785-9100

 - 13XN01_.XLS
 - letter.doc
 - response.doc


sears.com Visit sears.com for great Father's Day gift ideas Gift Center [IMAGE]Electronics [IMAGE]Lawn and Garden [IMAGE]Tools [IMAGE]Gift Card [IMAGE]Sweepstakes        Free Shipping* on many Father's Day gift ideas!    Craftsman
 101pc. Mechanic's Tool Set, 00933101Craftsman
 101pc. Mechanic's Tool Set  Sale $69.99   Sony Camcorder, 05758861Sony Camcorder  Sears Low Price $599.99   Panasonic 27in. TV, 05747511Panasonic 27" TV  Sale $289.99       Craftsman
 10in. Miter Saw, 00924315Craftsman
 10" Miter Saw  Sale $189.05   Remington
 Rotary Shaver, 00868400Remington Rotary Shaver
  Sale $74.99   Hewlett Packard, 00353601Hewlett Packard Digital Camera  Sears Low Price $199.99  Visit our Gift Center  for more great Father's Day ideas    Briggs & Stratton Days  SAVE $50 - $400 after mail-in rebate**  Click here  for details & exclusions.    With Sears Gift Card, let Dad choose his gift.  With Sears Gift Card, let Dad choose his gift. Simply order at www.sears.com/giftcard      Dads/Grads Sweeps  Enter Dad for a chance to win one of 25 Craftsman tool prize packages in the Craftsman Do-It-Himself Giveaway ***     [IMAGE]    If you would no longer like to receive e-mailed special events information, sales notifications, or other messages from sears.com, please click here  and follow the "Unsubscribe" instructions. Or reply to this email with "Unsubscribe" in the subject line.  Your e-mail address will be removed within 5 business days from our email marketing list. Thank you!   * Free shipping with mail-in rebate on the following Father's Day Gift Ideas : Portable Power Tools, Power Tool Accessories, Mechanics Tools, Tool Sets, Hand Tools: General Purpose and Carpentry, Camcorders, DVD Players, VCRs, Car Electronics, Home Theater Systems, PDAs, Personal CD Players and Notebook Computers purchased from sears.com between 5/27/01 - 6/09/01.   ** Offer good on qualifying mowers and tractors over $199 with a Briggs and Stratton engine purchased between June 3, 2001 and June 16, 2001. See sears.com  for form and additional details.  *** CONDENSED RULES: No purchase necessary. From 12:01 a.m. EST on 5/13/01 through 11:59 p.m. EST on 6/16/01 you can enter the sweepstakes online at sears.com. Must be 18 years or older and a legal U.S. resident. Void outside the 50 United States and DC and where prohibited. For full Official Rules see sears.com.

Message-Id: <20010604202809.4DAF.407367-8453@specials.sears.com>
 [IMAGE]


Attached is a notice of Edward O'Neill's change of address pertaining to the
above-mentioned matters.  It is a Word Document.  You may contact me at the
telephone # or e-mail address listed below if you have difficulty opening
the document.  Thank you.

 <<Letter to Process.doc>>
Anne Louis
Davis Wright Tremaine, LLP
One Embarcadero Center
Suite 600
San Francisco, CA 94111
(415) 276-6579
Fax: (415) 276-6599
annelouis@dwt.com

 - Letter to Process.doc


you sounded like a mexican in a marriache (sp?) band.  you were rolling your
r's.  i was just sitting there thinking "what the fuck?" .  you are a wild
woman.


Reservation status has changed. Details of the reservation are listed below:
ASSIGNMENT_REF = 27867
SELLER_CODE = AZPS
SELLER_DUNS = 958982563
CUSTOMER_CODE = EPMI
CUSTOMER_DUNS = 848921276
AFFILIATE_FLAG = 0
PATH_NAME = W/AZPS/AZPS-AZPS/FOURCORNE345 - PNPKAPS230//
POINT_OF_RECEIPT = FOURCORNE345
POINT_OF_DELIVERY = PNPKAPS230
SOURCE = presched
SINK = presched
CAPACITY = 25
CAPACITY_REQUESTED = 25
SERVICE_INCREMENT = HOURLY
TS_CLASS = FIRM
TS_TYPE = POINT_TO_POINT
TS_PERIOD = OFF_PEAK
TS_WINDOW = FIXED
TS_SUBCLASS = WHEEL
NERC_CURTAILMENT_PRIORITY = Nerc Priority 1
OTHER_CURTAILMENT_PRIORITY = Default
START_TIME = 01/10/2002
STOP_TIME = 01/11/2002
CEILING_PRICE = 1.95
OFFER_PRICE = 1.95
BID_PRICE = 1.95
PRICE_UNITS = $/mW
PRECONFIRMED = YES
ANC_SVC_LINK = N/A
ANC_SVC_REQ = N/A
POSTING_REF = 0
SALE_REF =
REQUEST_REF =
DEAL_REF =
NEGOTIATED_PRICE_FLAG =
STATUS = CONFIRMED
STATUS_NOTIFICATION = holden.salisbury@enron.com
STATUS_COMMENTS =
TIME_QUEUED = 01/09/2002

TIME_OF_LAST_UPDATE = 01/09/2002
PRIMARY_PROVIDER_COMMENTS =
SELLER_COMMENTS =
CUSTOMER_COMMENTS =
SELLER_NAME = AZPS
SELLER_PHONE = 602.250.1128
SELLER_FAX = 602.250.1155
SELLER_EMAIL = oasisadm@apsc.com
CUSTOMER_NAME = Enron Power Marketing, Inc.
CUSTOMER_PHONE = (713)853-3801
CUSTOMER_FAX = (713)646-8272
CUSTOMER_EMAIL = bill.rust@enron.com
REASSIGNED_REF = 0
REASSIGNED_CAPACITY = 0


I don't get it

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 3:07 PM
To:	Griffith, John
Subject:	RE: Settles

I sure am hungry!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Griffith, John
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 3:07 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE: Settles

Here are the settles.  Thanks.

John

 << File: Daily Settles.xls >>

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 2:12 PM
To:	Griffith, John
Subject:	Settles

 << File: Daily Settles.xls >>


So do you think things are proceeding well ?


Jo?o

Congratulations for you enlightening participation at todays' meeting with
generators to rebuff Annex V arguments.

For the first time in two years I have seen the "underdogs" distributors
beating the powerful generators.  The performance reminded me the Brazil 4 x
Italy 1, June 21, 1970 final world cup soccer match. Let's not give up.

Luiz Maurer
05/24/2001 07:02 PM
To: Joao Carlos Albuquerque/SA/Enron@Enron
cc: Joe Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron, David M Rosenberg/SA/Enron@Enron, Fred
Sampaio/SA/Enron@Enron, Orlando Gonzalez/SA/Enron@Enron, Sergio
Assad/SA/Enron@Enron, Britaldo Soares/SA/Enron@Enron, Brett R
Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron, Remi Collonges/SA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: CAP no MAE

Joao

I know we are all in the same boat. We share the same ideas as well. The only
difference is perhaps the approach.

I am kind of skeptical of negotiating with those guys. COEX has been a two
year failure in terms of consensus building. Where has consensus led us?
Nowhere. After some point, it is worthless discussing with those guys. (I
know that you have been standing and fighting)

You are  probably right when  you say I am being radical . Given my
skepticism, I think there are only two ways: (i) going straight to Pedro
Parente (ii) or, a big splash in the media. (because we have a coherent
story, there are always many reporters willing to listen to us; I think we
should not be afraid of putting a stick on the ground, as necessary)

I know that Mario Arce got upset with me and I did not mean it. However, he
has to know that if he comes up with some "pre-cooked" crazy ideas (Kill
Annex V,  caps on spot) he will have to face the "discipline" of the media.
He (or any other) has to know that we will do whatever is necessary to get
our ideas across. It is a war. No time for consensus building or for being
the nice guy. They are writing new laws as we speak. There is a strong sense
of urgency. It is a make it or break it situation.

This is my modest view only.

LM

Joao Carlos Albuquerque
05/23/2001 09:05 PM
To: Joe Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron, David M Rosenberg/SA/Enron@Enron, Luiz
Maurer/SA/Enron@Enron, Fred Sampaio/SA/Enron@Enron
cc: Orlando Gonzalez/SA/Enron@Enron, Sergio Assad/SA/Enron@Enron, Fred
Sampaio/SA/Enron@Enron, Britaldo Soares/SA/Enron@Enron, Brett R
Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron, Remi Collonges/SA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: CAP no MAE

David and Luiz,

Please don't be radical and don't  put words when you do not know  what is
going on.
Some important players and people are supporting a very low cap: some 320
reais or even less (320 is in one of the Generators proposal).
I was the one fighting in all meetings  I had, last and this week, standing
up in front of everybody, supporting NO CAP AT ALL.
What I tried to share with you was a second line of defence Plan B  type.
So don't think you are the only paladins of the market. We are fighting hard
for ENRON's positions, in the real word, and working very hard, believe me.

thanks,

Jo?o Carlos

Joe Kishkill
05/22/2001 08:39 AM
To: Orlando Gonzalez, Joao Carlos Albuquerque/SA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: CAP no MAE

Got the info late, but...

I also can not see how we can even consider supporting price caps.  If they
come, they come.  Politica are a reality.  But we should not support them or
even hint at encouraging them.  If we are thinking about doing so, please let
me know because I strongly object.

Thanks,

Kish
---------------------- Forwarded by Joe Kishkill/SA/Enron on 05/22/2001 08:36
AM ---------------------------

David M Rosenberg
05/21/2001 10:40 AM
To: Joe Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: CAP no MAE

FYI.   I just noticed that you weren't in this chain.
---------------------- Forwarded by David M Rosenberg/SA/Enron on 21/05/2001
10:44 ---------------------------

David M Rosenberg
21/05/2001 10:20
To: Luiz Maurer/SA/Enron@Enron
cc: Joao Carlos Albuquerque/SA/Enron@Enron, Orlando Gonzalez/SA/Enron@Enron,
Sergio Assad/SA/Enron@Enron, Fred Sampaio/SA/Enron@Enron, Britaldo
Soares/SA/Enron@Enron, Brett R Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron, Remi
Collonges/SA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: CAP no MAE

Luiz,

Thanks again for maintaining a voice of sanity.

In my not so humble opinion, it is commercial suicide for us to even give the
appearance of supporting price caps.  I can't think of any other situation
anywhere in the world where Enron has supported price caps in a market.  To
the contrary, we are almost always public in our opposition to such
market-killing sophistry.

Consensus is a noble objective, but sometimes it is just better to let people
know your true opinion.

--DMR

Luiz Maurer
20/05/2001 23:16
To: Joao Carlos Albuquerque/SA/Enron@Enron
cc: Orlando Gonzalez/SA/Enron@Enron, Sergio Assad/SA/Enron@Enron, Fred
Sampaio/SA/Enron@Enron, Britaldo Soares/SA/Enron@Enron, Brett R
Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron, Remi Collonges/SA/Enron@Enron, David M
Rosenberg/SA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: CAP no MAE

I strongly disagree

"If it is impossible to reach an agreement within ABRADEE",, then we should
be loud an clear in expressing our own view, to all levels of government
including a position paper to  Pedro Parente asap.  Caps at this point in
time may jeopardize the rationing plan per se. We had a victory in anchoring
the penalties to the MAE price. Why surrender it now?

Why do we have to abide by ABRADEE's desires?

This is not a religious issue only.  There are a few US$ million left on the
table.

How many US$ million are on the table for Enron?

 - Ballpark, possibly  US$20f or Elektro's long position  (60 in EBITDA *
(680-460)/680)
 - A lot, lot more for Eletrobolt (perhaps to the point of killing the
project, as Joao Albuquerque stated)

Are we being consistent? About a week ago, we submitted our views to ANEEL,
on Public Hearing 02/2001, advocating for an increase in the cost of defict
to US$ 2350/MWh. The trading group (Remi, David) were adamant about this
position submitted by Regulatory Affairs (I think they are right)

Are we acting to the best interest of our shareholders?

LM

Joao Carlos Albuquerque
05/20/2001 11:40 AM
To: jmazon@elektro.com.br, Orlando Gonzalez/SA/Enron@Enron, Sergio
Assad/SA/Enron@Enron, Luiz Maurer/SA/Enron@Enron, Fred Sampaio/SA/Enron@Enron
cc: Britaldo Soares/SA/Enron@Enron, Brett R Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron

Subject: CAP no MAE

Algumas empresas de distribui??o short em 02 e 03 est?o defendendo fortememte
CAP no MAE,  bem abaixo do custo do d,ficit ( cerca de R$ 680). ( CERJ,
Cataguases, LIght est? em cima do muro, etc...)

Se for inevit?vel, nossa posi??o deve ser:

 - N?O PODE SER INFERIOR AO PRE_O PRATICADO NO PRE-RACIONAMENTO ( R$ 460,00 )
 - N?O PODE SER INFERIOR ? MAIOR TARIFA COBRADA DOS CONSUMIDORES  ( TROS
VEZES A TARIFA RESIDENCIAL  ATUAL - 200% SOBRE A MESMA, PARA CONSUMOS ACIMA
DE 500 KWh POR MOS) .

Mazzon, calcule a ordem de grandeza deste valor. _ importante termos isto em
mente quando formos falar com as autoridades amanh? e, em especial com Mauro
Arce.

Lembrar, ainda, que um CAP baixo, sem FLOOR, pode matar ELETROBOLT, uma vez
que as receitas que esta auferiria em 2002 n?o compensariam o decr,scimo das
mesmas de 2003 em diante, quando, com a redu??o de mercado devido ao
racionamento e o aumento de entrada de novas fontes de gera??o, tamb,m
incentivada pelo racionamento, poder? derrubar fortemente os pre?os do MAE.
N?o devemos nos esquecer que o per?odo de amortiza??o de ELETROBOLT , de
cinco anos.

Jo?o Carlos


---------------------- Forwarded by Matt Smith/NA/Enron on 04/10/2001 09:36
AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Tara Piazze                           04/02/2001 05:33 PM

To: Nate Blackburn/NA/Enron@Enron, Matt Smith/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sabina
Rank/NA/Enron@Enron, Justin O'Malley/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Manual Entry Testing Link

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Tara Piazze/NA/Enron on 04/02/2001 05:23
PM ---------------------------
From: Chris Hyde/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/02/2001 05:31 PM
To: Tara Piazze/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Colin Tonks/ENRON@enronXgate, Chris Gaskill/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Manual Entry Testing Link

http://fundamentals.dev.corp.enron.com/admin/manualentry/

This is strictly for testing...provided it goes well, we will activate
security and create a link in the tree for this (as well as move it up to
production).

Chris


I gave Marchris my comments, but if you've got time you should review.  THANKS

----- Forwarded by Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron on 03/31/2001 01:06 PM -----

	Marchris Robinson
	03/30/2001 09:10 AM

		 To: Steve Montovano/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, David
Fairley/Enron@EnronXGate, Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Forbes draft

FYI
----- Forwarded by Marchris Robinson/NA/Enron on 03/30/2001 09:04 AM -----

	"Daphne E. Gilbert" <daphne@katzlaw.com>
	03/29/2001 01:52 PM

		 To: <Marchris.Robinson@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Forbes draft

The attached is a draft article prepared by Susan Clark that we would like to
submit to Forbes Magazine.  Please review and provided any comments you have
by Monday, April  2.

www.katzlaw.com
_______________________________________

This transmission is intended to be delivered only to the named addressee(s)
and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary, attorney
work-product or attorney-client privileged.  If this information is received
by anyone other than the named addressee(s), the recipient should immediately
notify the sender by E-MAIL and by telephone (850) 224-9634 and obtain
instructions as to the disposal of the transmitted material.  In no event
shall this material be read, used, copied, reproduced, stored or retained by
anyone other than the named addressee(s), except with the express consent of
the sender or the named addressee(s).  Thank you.

 - forbesfinal.doc


FYI

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Millar, John
Sent:	Wednesday, August 22, 2001 11:32 AM
To:	Lindberg, Lorraine
Cc:	Gadd, Eric
Subject:	Kingman Heat Recovery

Hi Lorraine,

Next week I'm heading west to meet with Mohave Electric Co-op and EWS West Desk regarding this project.  I know we've spoken about it before, but I was hoping to have some time with you this afternoon to get you up to speed on our progress and get your input on the attached presentation.  Could I come by at 3:00pm?  Please advise.

Thanks,
John


Dick,

PLease see attached. Click on the first tab

Monika

-----Original Message-----
From: Robinson, Richard T.
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 10:27 AM
To: Causholli, Monika
Subject: RE: Pulp Update: Inventory Rise in July Well Below Average;
Goldman Sachs High Yield Research; 8/14/01

Monika -
Do you have the latest pulp inventory curve for NORSCAN?  Thx.  DR

-----Original Message-----
From: Causholli, Monika
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 10:24 AM
To: Aguilera-Peon, Maria Teresa; Allan, David; Biggerstaff, Finley;
Boudreaux, Jay; Bruch, Greg; Bryja, James; Carter, Karen E.; Conner,
Andrew R.; Crane, Bob; Dimitry, Dirk; Rickard, Craig; Robinson, Richard
T.; Stapley, Cecil
Subject: FW: Pulp Update: Inventory Rise in July Well Below Average;
Goldman Sachs High Yield Research; 8/14/01

-----Original Message-----
From: Velez, Luis
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 10:24 AM
To: Causholli, Monika
Subject: FW: Pulp Update: Inventory Rise in July Well Below Average;
Goldman Sachs High Yield Research; 8/14/01

-----Original Message-----
From: Stivaletti, Joe [mailto:joe.stivaletti@gs.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 10:22 AM
To: Stivaletti, Joe
Subject: Pulp Update: Inventory Rise in July Well Below Average; Goldman
Sachs High Yield Research; 8/14/01

Pulp Update: Inventory Rise in July Well Below Average; Goldman Sachs High
Yield Research; 8/14/01

Norscan pulp inventories rose just 4,000 tonnes in July, which is well below
the typical seasonal increase of approximately 150,000 tonnes.  Amidst all
the bad news about the pulp environment, this is good news.  Producer
downtime is certainly helping.  However, pulp prices remain quite weak, and
inventories of 1.78 million tonnes are still too high to allow for any
tightening of supply and demand in the short term.

We will distribute details of the July pulp report once they are available.

Joe Stivaletti
Goldman, Sachs, & Co.
High Yield Research
85 Broad Street, 29th floor
New York, NY 10004
(212) 902-3299


-----Original Message-----
From: Fraser, Jennifer
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 3:59 PM
To: Arnold, John
Subject: FW: American Rice RFP Clarification--please send to right person

-----Original Message-----
From: Chuck Pavlica [mailto:cpavlica@enerad.com]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 3:56 PM
To: Prospective Natural Gas Supplier
Subject: American Rice RFP Clarification

Based on questions I have received, I wanted to make sure everyone had the same information in preparing their bid on the American Rice natural gas RFP.

American Rice holds transportation on Dow moving gas from the various pipeline interconnects with Dow at Katy to their facility in Freeport. ARI will give you monthly nominations and be responsible for imbalances on Dow.  If you provide an index related price, we would like the option to convert it to a fixed price at our option.

I hope this helps you in your bid preparation.  Proposals are due September 20, 2001.  Thank you for your consideration.

Chuck Pavlica
Ascentergy Corporation
440 Benmar, Suite 1060
Houston, TX  77060
(281) 447-7376 ext. 117
(281) 447-7310 fax
email: cpavlica@enerad.com <mailto:cpavlica@enerad.com>