From a Clean Fuels standpoint I'll offer the following:

#5  This should read  Underground NGL Storage at Mt. Belvieu

#6  Natural gas purchasing (feedstock for methanol production)

#19  Isobutylene production  (we sell isobutylene to a single customer in
addition to MTBE to several)

#20  We transport NGL's up and down the Ship Channel as well as to Texas City

I hope this helps, if not please call.

                                                                Jim Prentice


I will be out of town.  Thanks for the invite.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Taylor, Gina
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 11:06 AM
To:	Hayslett, Rod; Geaccone, Tracy
Subject:	Nutcracker Market

Rod and Tracy,

I'm confirming who's planning to attend the Nutcracker Market Brunch on Friday, Nov. 9.

Confirmed to date include:

Gina Taylor
Cindy Stark
Debbie Horton
Lynn Blair
Socal Customer

Roc, is Kathy still planning to attend?  Tracy, can you come?

Please let me know by the end of this week.

Thanks!

Gina


As promised, although a little later than expected, a draft agenda is
attached at the end of my memo to Mike.  The memo will walk you through the
agenda.  Please let me know if you have any comments or suggestions.  Again,
I an sorry that you will not be able to join us, but I am pleased that so
many others from the London office will be in attendance.  --Sally
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 10/18/2000 09:12 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Sally Beck                           10/18/2000 09:11 PM

To: Mike Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Draft Agenda

Attached is a draft agenda for your review and comments.  As speakers were
confirmed, the placement of certain items on the agenda were dictated by the
speakers' schedules and then logical grouping of topics around those
speakers.  Sunday evening will not be heavy - simple welcome and intros,
drink and dinner - I know that many will be tired from traveling.  We have
arranged for a private showing of the movie Rogue Trader (complete with comfy
chairs and popcorn) which I thought could be fun for the group to see as a
means of setting the stage for our discussions on Monday and Tuesday.  This
can be optional, as I know that jet lag my get the best of some.

The morning on Monday will set the stage:  why we have gathered, endorsement
of our efforts (Causey).  Perhaps you, Brent and I could each give a short
"state of the union of operations" according to us - covering ENA, EGM and
EEL).  Then definition of the operating standards that we must uphold,
discussion, plans on reporting and buy in on these.

Monday lunch will allow everyone to share with their tablemates a project in
which they are involved that will have an impact on global consistency of
operational controls, or a project which through sharing or expanding could
have such an impact.  Each table can report back as we gather to start the
afternoon.

Having defined and discussed fundamental operating standards, we will move
Monday afternoon to review of the Doorstep concept: what, why, how and
lessons learned.  Then we will discuss next steps around this on-going
project.

Just before the afternoon break, we will roll out a new communications tool
for the operations controllers:  a website tailored for the group.

We will finish the afternoon by tying in operations performance and its
impact on assessing and measuring market risk and credit risk, with Ted
Murphy and Bill Bradford addressing the group.

Monday evening will include a tour of Enron Field and dinner at Ruggles
Center Field Terrace.  Bill Bradford will join us for dinner, and we are
waiting for an RSVP from Ted Murphy.

Tuesday morning will start with Jeff Skilling as our real keynote speaker.
He plans to spend an hour plus with the group.  He will make an informal
presentation and then will entertain questions.  The rest of the morning will
be spent in breakout teams, with assignments to come up with specific action
steps to strengthen operating controls, improve the accuracy of information
provided and move toward best practices in providing mid and back office
services within Enron.

Before lunch, Tom Gros and I will share a short story on CommodityLogic.
Philippe Bibi will join us for lunch to share his IT vision with the group.
After lunch, we will wrap up and summarize next steps, including a date to
reconvene much of this group perhaps early in 2001 to check progess against
our designated next steps (wholesale group in London perhaps).

Please call me or e:mail any comments or suggestions.  The only details still
in flux are Tom Gros' availability and confirmation of Philippe's
attendance.


Daren - fyi see below - I have already changed expected volume in sitara
120266 for Sept 25 - 30

Lee

---------------------- Forwarded by Lee L Papayoti/HOU/ECT on 09/08/2000
10:52 AM ---------------------------

"Diane Drumm" <drummd@notes.basf-corp.com> on 09/08/2000 10:14:47 AM
To: lee.l.papayoti@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: ENRON - FREEPORT NATURAL GAS NOMINATIONS

Due to a Cogen shut down  September 25 - 30th, Freeports gas requirements will
be reduced.  Please see below.

For the month of  September 2000, please schedule the following delivery of
natural gas to BASF's  Freeport, Texas plant

          QUANTITY
          (MMBTU's Day)

          1-24 25-30
          8,000     6,000

If you have any questions please give me a call.


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Tom May/Corp/Enron on 05/17/2001 02:01 PM
---------------------------

"Rogers, David" <DRogers@INTERGEN.com> on 05/17/2001 11:09:42 AM
To: "'tom.may@enron.com'" <tom.may@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: FW: Skygen agreement

Per my phone message.

?-----Original Message-----

From: ? Hinkle, Angela?

Sent:?? Thursday, May 17, 2001 11:05 AM

To:???? Rogers, David

Subject:??????? Skygen agreement

Attached is a file that is being sent to you per Doug Pedigo.? Please contact
him if you wish to discuss.

Thank you,

Angela Hinkle

Legal Administrative Assistant

 <<SKYGEN BLACKLINE VERSION.rtf>>

 - SKYGEN BLACKLINE VERSION.rtf


Gregg,

Joel is a lawyer with Global Finance.  Since Corp will be loaning the money,
I contacted that legal group to get their buy in (they are Sarah's lawyers,
so to speak).  Anyway, I thought the change of name from enovate to enervate
is priceless.  Enervate= to weaken or destroy the strength or vitality of...

Strange choice for a company name!!!

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/06/2000 09:38
AM ---------------------------
From: Joel Ephross on 11/03/2000 05:43 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sarah Wesner/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Jordan Mintz/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Ennervate

Jordan has asked me to take a look at this. Please contact me Monday morning
to discuss.  [x 5-4998]

Joel


Christian:  Please mark this time on your calendar to speak with Mark T.:
3:30 Houston/1:30 Portland.  We'll call you.

Will Pat Boylston send over 1 or 2 cases for us to review prior to the call?

Thanks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 06/05/2001 09:00 AM -----

	Holly Keiser@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	06/05/2001 08:36 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Schedule meeting with Mark Taylor for Thursday, June 7

Sorry... you mentioned that in the subject line.

3:30 pm on Thursday.

Holly Keiser
Enron Americas
Legal Department - EB 3887
713-345-7893 (ph)
713-646-3490 (fx)
Holly.Keiser@enron.com

	Sara Shackleton@ECT
	06/05/2001 08:19 AM

		 To: Holly Keiser/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Schedule meeting with Mark Taylor for Thursday, June 7

I'd like to meet Thursday, June 7

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Holly Keiser@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	06/05/2001 07:34 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Schedule meeting with Mark Taylor for Thursday, June 7

Sara -- I've scheduled 3:00 PM following today's Legal/Credit meeting.  If
you prefer later, please let me know.

Thanks!
Holly Keiser
Enron Americas
Legal Department - EB 3887
713-345-7893 (ph)
713-646-3490 (fx)
Holly.Keiser@enron.com

	Sara Shackleton@ECT
	06/04/2001 06:12 PM

		 To: Holly Keiser/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Schedule meeting with Mark Taylor for Thursday, June 7

Does Mark have time in the afternoon to meet with me and Christian Yoder
(Portland - 2 hours earlier than CST)?  The topic is "Washington State
PUD's".  I'd schedule about an hour.  Thanks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Joe -

As a follow up on our meeting last week, I'm working with Rick Causey and
CAOs for ENA and Enron Europe to identify potential candidates and to refine
our job description for the local hire we want to recruit permanently.  Rick
wants to be closely involved in those decisions.  Would you please forward to
me some of the handouts you had with you or may have updated by now that
address the business environment, Gantt chart/timeline, office scope, timing
of business transactions etc. to aid in communicating Tokyo needs?  I'm not
sure if you sent anything to Sally, but I don't believe I've seen anything
yet.

Thank you,

Cassandra.


o.k.

Thanks!!

   Kate Symes @ ECT                02/02/2001 04:13 PM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: 2-2-01 Checkoutq

Chris Mallory and the Prebon broker are currently debating this price. I'll
let you know when they settle it.

Thanks,
Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
02/02/2001 01:30 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 2-2-01 Checkoutq

Chris Mallory
Deal 512609
Prebon shows price as $165....Enpower has $160.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"Dawn and Gary Wilson" <dkenne@houston.rr.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Saturday, January 05, 2002 10:05 AM
To:	 Patti Desmarais; Becker, Lorraine; Bryon Kenne; Bythewood, Richard; Giron, Darron C.; Denny, Jennifer; dfmensinger2; donkit@tnacces.com; Garrett, Gary; JBaer; Jim Babb; Kdandgg@cs.com; loretta; Max and Bev; Michelle Bythewood; tina.vincent@bcminc.com; TWBailey@mail.ev1.net
Subject:	Fw: Condom Sense....

> RUSSIAN CONDOMS
> >
> >    Russian President Putin called President George W. Bush with an
> "emergency:
> >    "Our largest condom factory has exploded," the Russian President
cried.
> >    "My people's favorite form of birth control......this is a true
> disaster!"
> >    "Mr. Putin, the American people would be happy to do anything within
> their
> >    power to help you," replied the President.
> >    "I do need your help," said Putin.  "Could you possibly send
1,000,000
> >    condoms, ASAP, to tide us over?"
> >    "Why certainly!  I'll get right on it," said Bush.
> >    "Oh, and one more small favor, please?" said Putin.
> >    "Yes?"
> >    "Could the condoms be red in color and at least 10 inches long and 4
> inches
> >    in diameter?" asked Putin.
> >    "No problem," replied the President.
> >    With that, George W. hung up the phone and then called the President
of
> the
> >    Acme Condom Company.
> >    "I need a favor. You've got to send 1,000,000 condoms over to Russia
> right
> > away."
> >    "Consider it done," said the CEO of Acme.
> >    "Great!  Now listen.  They have to be red in color, 10 inches long,
and
> 4
> >    inches in diameter."
> >    "Easily done.  Anything else?"
> >    "Yeah," said Bush. On each one print   the words 'MADE IN TEXAS,
SIZE:
> > SMALL."
> >
> >
>


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 11/02/2000
10:36 AM ---------------------------

"George Richards" <cbpres@austin.rr.com> on 11/02/2000 07:17:16 AM
Please respond to <cbpres@austin.rr.com>
To: "Phillip Allen" <pallen@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Resumes

Please excuse the delay in getting these resumes to you.  Larry did not have
his prepared and then I forgot to send them.  I'll try to get a status
report to you latter today.

 - winmail.dat


<http://image.0mm.com/37194/2002/0206-1/logos.gif>	  <http://image.0mm.com/37194/2002/0206-1/header.gif>    <http://image.0mm.com/37194/2002/0206-3/we_264_acc.jpg>

Join Upromise and turn your Starpoints
 into money for college.

Now every time you enjoy a good night's sleep at a Starwood hotel or resort you can earn money for college. Starwood has teamed up with Upromise, a free service that helps families save for college every day. As a Starwood Preferred Guest you can convert 5,000 Starpoints into $50 for college. And for each additional 1,000 points, Starwood will give you $10 for college.

Join Upromise for free today <http://spg.0mm.com/sta143009>  <http://spg.0mm.com/sta143009>

As a Upromise member, you can also save thousands for college with hundreds of other leading companies. Companies like ExxonMobil, Toys"R"Us, AT&T, McDonald's, General Motors, Border's Books & Music
 and many others will contribute a portion of what you spend with them into a college savings account for your child, grandchild or any child you love.
	  <http://image.0mm.com/37194/2002/0206-1/upromise.gif>

Here are just a few other examples of how much Upromise could help you save:

If you do this:	 Over 15 years you could save:
Spend about $600 a month on credit cards...	          $2,000 for college
Buy three new cars...	          $800 for college
Average $50 a month dining out...	          $1,600 for college
Spend roughly $25 a month on long distance calls...	          $325 for college
Shop online (average of $50 a month)...	          $800 for college

Upromise membership is free. No catch. No hassles. And these are just some of hundreds of ways you can save for college with Upromise.

Learn more about Starwood Preferred Guest and Upromise <http://spg.0mm.com/sta143010>  <http://spg.0mm.com/sta143010>

Start adding to your college savings right now. It only takes minutes to join for free, and the college savings keep coming. Day after day. Year after year.

  _____

If you would like to receive future promotional e-mails in text-only format, click here <http://spg.0mm.com/sta143006+scorman@enron.com>.

You are subscribed as: scorman@enron.com

If you would like your e-mail to be sent to a different address, please click here <http://spg.0mm.com/sta143004+scorman@enron.com>.

Click here <http://www.starwood.com/preferredguest/privacy_policy.html> to review the Starwood Preferred Guest privacy policy.

Click here <http://www.starwood.com/preferredguest/terms_conditions.html> to review the Starwood Preferred Guest program terms and conditions.

You have received this e-mail as a member of Starwood Preferred Guest. If you prefer not to receive future promotional e-mails from Starwood Preferred Guest, please click here <http://spg.0mm.com/sta143005+scorman@enron.com>. It may take up to 10 business days to completely remove you from our e-mail list and there is a slight chance that you may receive e-mail from us within that time.


---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 12/20/99
01:50 PM ---------------------------

Lara Leibman@EES
12/14/99 11:12 AM
To: Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: DOJ Questions

Sarah,

I haven't heard back from Jade yet.  Beginning to think she is on vacation.
In any case, looking at the questions below, I think #2-3 shold not be
problematic for us to answer; seems like #4 is irrelevant; and #1 will be
sensitive.  In any case, I will touch base with Jade (on a general basis) and
contact you as soon as that happens.  If Michelle calls again, please tell
her to feel free to call me in the interim.  I met her briefly about a year
and a half ago and she may remember me.  Thanks.

Lara

Sarah Novosel@ENRON
12/14/99 10:57 AM
To: Lara Leibman/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: DOJ Questions

Lara:

Here are the questions posed to us by DOJ (the attorney I spoke with is
Michelle Cano - Jade Eaton is the lead attorney)

1. Markets that Enron is trading in

2. More information about Enron's request to become a control area in ECAR

3. Transmission constraints

4. Enron's plans for sale of power from its new plant in Illinois Power's
service territory.

In addition to these Enron-specific questions, Michelle also discussed more
general issues about the AEP/CSW merger such as whether AEP's ownership of
coal-fired generation combined with CSW's ownership of gas-fired generation
will give the merged company market power

Christi told me that Enron is not planning on building a generator in
Illinois Power's service territory in the near future, so we are confused by
DOJ's reference to this plant.

Christi is in the loop on this issue also, so please include us both on
emails or phone calls.

Thanks for your help Lara.

Sarah


EEI's State Restructuring Service Web Site was just launched last month and
recorded over 11,000 hits in October.  We think that if you are at all
interested in what's going in restructuring states in response to
California's ongoing demand/supply imbalance, market problems in several
other states, you would be interested in EEI's new Web site.

The State Restructuring Service includes:

o  News and analyses of noteworthy legislative, regulatory and judicial
decisions as they occur
o  Implementation decisions in restructuring states
o  Noteworthy restructuring-related actions in other states, even if not of
comprehensive scope
o  E-mail notification of all noteworthy restructuring and related actions
o  E-mails are posted to the Web site's Action Alerts section within 24 hours
o  Site's Action Alerts are browsable and fully searchable
o  Hyperlinks to all Web posted source documents are provided
o  Policy overviews and analyses of all comprehensive restructuring laws and
regulatory decisions

The service includes e-mail notification of breaking restructuring actions,
as well as full access to the Web site.  For those who just need a heads up
about noteworthy state policy actions, the e-mail service is available as a
separate stand-alone service (free to members) or for half the price of the
full Web service.  We cover all aspects of restructuring the electric utility
industry and the implementation of retail electricity competition at the
state level from the comprehensive laws, to regulatory and judicial decisions.

Availability --------------------------->

The Web site is available to EEI members (free of charge) and to anyone else
for a fee at:
http://www.eei.org/7online/online/srs/

Please see the attached MS Rich Text Format file with more information about
how members can get an ID/Password, as well as the pricing and subscription
process for EEI Associate members and non-member organizations.

Please feel free to forward this e-mail (with attachment) to anyone you think
might be interested in staying informed of state restructuring policy
developments and researching existing state policies.

EEI member utilities wishing to have access should contact Lynn Hailes at:
lhailes@eei.org or 202/508-5624.

EEI Associates and non-members should review the attached file and direct
questions about subscribing to ekaleda@eei.org or call 202/508-5005.

Questions about the product and its content should go to Norman Jenks at:
njenks@eei.org or 202/508-5533.

Thank you for your interest in our State Restructuring E-Forums!

Norman Jenks and Lynn Hailes

 - SRSBrochureText.rtf


Please open the attached file to read the complete text of the following
items:

11:37AM EDT 22-SEP-00 WIT SOUNDVIEW (MARK SPECKER) INTC CPQ DELL
PC UPDATE SEPTEMBER 22, 2000

08:30AM EDT 22-SEP-00 C.E. UNTERBERG, TOWBIN (JAMES POYNER) CPQ
CPQ: INTEL`S EUROPEAN SHORTFALL CONTRARY TO COMPAQ VIEW

08:03AM EDT 22-SEP-00 SALOMON SMITH BARNEY (RICHARD GARDNER) AAPL
IMPLICATIONS OF INTEL 3Q WARNING FOR PC STOCKS

09:41AM EDT 22-SEP-00 GOLDMAN SACHS (JOE MOORE) INTC INTC.GWI INTC.N
INTC PREANNOUNCEMENT: THOUGHTS REGARDING IMPACT ON OTHER STOCKS

00:16AM EDT 22-SEP-00 MORGAN STANLEY\DW (MUNSON, GILLIAN) CPQ
TECHNOLOGY: SOME ANSWERS TO THE CURRENCY JITTERS FOR PCS

 <<09.22.00 Analyst Reports.doc>>

The analyst reports provided are reports prepared by independent analysts
who monitor and track Compaq's performance.  These reports are not prepared
by or at the direction of Compaq and as a result, Compaq is not endorsing or
verifying the information contained in these reports or endorsing any of
these analysts.   These reports are being provided solely for business
reasons and as a result, do not distribute these reports to other
individuals outside of Compaq.  If other individuals are interested in
receiving the reports provided herein, please contact Elizabeth Davis in
Compaq's Investor Relations Department at elizabeth.davis@compaq.com.

Elizabeth Davis
Compaq - Investor Relations
Research Analyst
281-518-4289

 - 09.22.00 Analyst Reports.doc


I was unaware that this was on the table for discussion in World Hunger.

My recollection is that Mike Barnas proposed the changes to 20.2 (b), which
addresses indemnity for fines and penalties (who can forget the cognizant
government?).  We agreed to narrow GE's exposure by specifically relating the
indemnity obligation to a violation of section 3.8, as opposed to the broader
provision in prior contracts.

From: Scott Dieball@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 05/21/2001 09:10 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Bill Williams/PDX/ECT@ECT, John G
Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, pthompson@akllp.com,
Roseann Engeldorf/Enron@EnronXGate@ENRON, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Arcos- World Hunger- LOL fines carve out.

Steve knows I am pissed about this and in our Arcos meeting I brought up the
same point raised by Kay below.  Steve claims that the no cap on gov.
violations was rejected some time ago by GE mana. when Barnas presented to
them an update of the "end world hunger".  Steve also thinks that they had
told us previously about this change.  ( Is this true???)  I told him it was
news to me and that I would have thought that if true, then GE would have (a)
highlighted the changes on the draft contract and/or (b) added it to the list
of outstanding issues.

When asked to explain the rationale for changing their position on this
issue, Steve was unable to give an answer other than to say GE mana. had said
that they needed to cap their liability at the contract price for gov.
violations although they thought GE could live with no cap on FCPA violations.

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	05/18/2001 01:14 PM

		 To: John G Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc: Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
pthompson@akllp.com@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Roseann Engeldorf/Enron@EnronXGate,
Scott Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Bill
Williams/PDX/ECT@ECT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 Subject: Re: Arcos- World Hunger- LOL fines carve out.

Did Steve S ask that it be added to the list?  I would let them bring it up
if he didn't.  We spent quite a bit of time and effort on the LOL clause, and
it was subject to lots of give and take.

Kay

John G Rigby@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
05/18/2001 07:03 AM
To: Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON, pthompson@akllp.com,
Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Scott Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Bill
Williams/PDX/ECT@ECT, John Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Arcos- World Hunger- LOL fines carve out.

GE has informed us during the Arcos discussion that GE senior management has
directed that the GE deal team cannot agree to allowing GE indemnity
obligations related with government fines for failure to comply with law to
be exclude from the limit of liability.

This needs to be added to Pete T's World Hunger Punchlist of issues.

Enron Arcos deal team has not agreed to GE's position.


Jim,

No changes in the schedule. The meeting will take place, as scheduled,
on the 6th of December at 9:00 a.m. We may have to cancel lunch with the
professors as they have other commitments. The meeting will last
about 2 hours.

Vince


fyi

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"scott neal" <sneal4@houston.rr.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Saturday, January 26, 2002 11:18 AM
To:	Neal, Scott
Subject:	FW: Westchester Peewee Baseball Warm-up

-----Original Message-----
From: Benninger, David [mailto:DBenninger@reliant.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 1:13 PM
To: Aaron Croley; abiassi; Adam Harmon; Alan Clayton; Alan Colyer
(E-mail); Alden Hurst; Alex Erhardt; Andrew Hadley; Ashton Fetzer;
Austin Read; Ben Dougherty; Ben Gregg; Ben Orlean; Bill Burge; Billy
Eiser; Brendan Cazier; Butch Butcher (E-mail); Carl Carameros (E-mail);
Christian Delouche; Clint Simpson (E-mail); Colin Brown; Colton Neal;
Cooper Day (E-mail); David Benninger (E-mail); Drew Rino; Dye Jamie; Ed
Colquitt; Eric Larsen; Ethan Miller; Grant Goodland; Grant Lund; Greer
McCord; Hayden Barnett; Hippard Greer; Jackson Hart; Jake Simpson; Jimmy
Daggett (E-mail); John Davis; John Gentry; John Spafford; Johnathan
Slezman; Jonathan Davis; Jordan Trout; Josh Weatherall; Keith Janes
(E-mail); Kyle Johnson; Lee Mitchell (E-mail); Lee Moore (E-mail); Lew
TenHave (E-mail); Luke Hillin; Marshall Settegast; Matt Cragg; Matt
McKellar; Matt Stubbs; Matthew Hays; Michael Kelly; Michael Mandola;
Michael Walker; Mike Gibson; miller; Murphy Graham (E-mail); Patrick
Reilly; Patronella, Mary Sue; Peter King; Philip Turpin; Randy Brann
(E-mail); Randy Jones (E-mail); Renay Orellana; Rob Smith (E-mail); Rod
Wiggins (E-mail); Ron Hancock (E-mail); Russell Ford; Sam Christopher;
Sam Hassell; Sam Taylor; Sandor Kato; Scott Erickson; Sean Bowman;
Sebastian Arnold; Stehr-Work (E-mail); Stephen Hall; Taylor Enis; Taylor
Patton; Thomas Deskin; Tommy Kellagher; Tommy Wilson (E-mail); Trenten
Moore; Troy Utz; Wade Jones; Whitmire; Will Owen; Zach Smith
Subject: Westchester Peewee Baseball Warm-up

Dear PeeWee Baseball '02 Player:

It's hard to believe that the 2002 SBMSA Baseball season is just around
the corner, but it is!  This year's Skills Evaluations for Westchester
PeeWees (3rd and 4th grades) will be held at the Spring Forest fields on
Saturday and Sunday, February 2nd and 3rd.  More information on this
will be telephoned to each player early next week that will detail the
exact time to show-up.  For those of us, however, that are in need of a
little "warm-up" before the evaluations, informal batting practice
(machine) and fielding drills will be going on next Wednesday and
Thursday (Jan 30 and 31st) at the Spring Forest fields from 6 - 8 pm.
To participate, come by either day (or both) with your glove, bat and
batting helmet.

See you next week,

David Benninger
Westchester PeeWee Commissioner
713/207-1329 (w)
713/984-1572 (h)


Yes, I think that would be our only option.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Schwartz, Nicole
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 5:08 PM
To:	Ring, Richard
Cc:	Mathis, Heather; Bolton, Stacey
Subject:	RE: Ohio Label

We will be serving physical in CG&E territory beginning in Feb. 2002 (this was jut pushed back from Dec. 2001).  Origination will begin preselling beginning this week.  Therefore, on the Disclosure Label, which we would present to customers along with contracts between now and Feb., are we ok with stating "Unknown Purchases" and then change that once we're not buying on the spot market?

Thanks

From:	Richard Ring/ENRON@enronXgate on 10/22/2001 03:50 PM
To:	Heather Mathis/HOU/EES@EES, Nicole Schwartz/HOU/EES@EES
cc:	Stacey Bolton/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject:	RE: Ohio Label

Heather,

To the best of my knowledge the only customers in Ohio where physical delivery "CURRENTLY" takes place is First Energy (MSG PRODUCT ONLY) and the First Energy utilities should be directly providing the Disclosure Labels or provide load serving entities with the information necessary to complete the Disclosure Labels.  Physical delivery of power, other than MSG PRODUCT, may occur between November 2001 and March 2002; in either event Disclosure Labels need to be submitted to customers with the initial contracts and not again until immediately prior to physical delivery of power.

In all likelihood, spot purchases of power, rather than specific purchases of power, will occur therefore the Disclosure Label "can only" contain Unknown Purchases, as described by Stacey Bolton.

Heather, I think that the three of us (you, Stacey and myself) need to discuss proper procedures regarding Disclosure Labels.

Richard

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mathis, Heather
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 1:28 PM
To:	Schwartz, Nicole; Ring, Richard
Cc:	Bolton, Stacey
Subject:	RE: Ohio Label

Richard et al:
I'm not sure what needs to be done - Nicole says we're doing a physical product in CG&E.  I will forward her message to me to all of you.  Richard & Stacy - please work together to figure out what needs to be done, if anything to the fuel mix part.

Thanks.

Heather
---------------------- Forwarded by Heather Mathis/HOU/EES on 10/22/2001 01:24 PM ---------------------------
From:	Richard Ring/ENRON@enronXgate on 10/18/2001 01:31 PM
To:	Heather Mathis/HOU/EES@EES
cc:	Stacey Bolton/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject:	RE: Ohio Label

Heather,

We are not delivering any power, other than Market Support Generation (MSG), which is provided by the First Energy utility companies.  It should either be the utilities that provide disclosure label information for our label we have to default to "Unknown Purchases" or whatever else is allowed/required by the Ohio PUC's.

Richard

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mathis, Heather
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 1:31 PM
To:	Ring, Richard
Subject:	Ohio Label

Richard:

We need to start sending our Ohio label with the contract to new Ohio customers (CG&E starting in Dec according to Nicole Schwartz).  I've had Sandy Cofer look over this one that was done by Allison way back when to see if it still meets requirements, and it does.  Can you confirm the fuel mixes, etc. for me?

Thanks.

Heather

 << File: CSP-6.01.xls >>


Critical Migration Information:

1. Your scheduled Outlook Migration Date is THE EVENING OF : May 1st
2. You need to press the "Save My Data" button (only once) to send us your
pre-migration information.
3. You must be connected to the network before you press the button.
4. If a POP-UP BOX appears, prompting you to "ABORT, CANCEL OR TRUST SIGNER"
please  select TRUST SIGNER.
5. Any information you Add to your Personal Address Book, Journal or calendar
after you click on the button will need to be manually re-added into Outlook
after you have been migrated.
6. Clicking this button does not complete your migration to Outlook. Your
migration will be completed  the evening of your migration date.

    Failure to click on the button means you WILL NOT get your Calendar,
Contacts, Journal and ToDo information imported into Outlook the day of your
migration and could result in up to a 2 week delay to restore this
information.

If you encounter any errors please contact the resolution center @
713-853-1411


/-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-\
BECOME A FOOL!
For stock ideas, retire-early strategies, and money-saving tips
Register for free with The Motley Fool
You'll receive our "13 Steps to Investing Foolishly" guide, free
Plus, access to our irreverent take on all things financial.
http://by.advertising.com/1/c/62072/47328/159183/159183

<a href="http://by.advertising.com/1/c/62072/47328/159183/159183">
AOL users click here </a>
\-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-/

   Word of the Day for Monday March 11, 2002:

   nescience \NESH-uhn(t)s; NESH-ee-uhn(t)s\, noun:
   Lack of knowledge or awareness; ignorance.

     The  ancients  understood  that  too  much  knowledge could
     actually  impede  human  functioning -- this at a time when
     the  encroachments  on  global nescience were comparatively
     few.
     --Cullen  Murphy,  "DNA Fatigue," [1]The Atlantic, November
     1997

     He  fought  on  our behalf in the war that finally matters:
     against   nescience,   against  inadvertence,  against  the
     supposition that anything is anything else.
     --Hugh  Kenner,  "On  the Centenary of James Joyce," [2]New
     York Times, January 31, 1982

     The notion has taken hold that every barometric fluctuation
     must  demonstrate  climate  change. This anecdotal case for
     global warming is mostly nonsense, driven by nescience of a
     basic  point,  from  statistics  and  probability, that the
     weather is always weird somewhere.
     --Gregg  Easterbrook  "Warming  Up,"  [3]The  New Republic,
     November 8, 1999
     _________________________________________________________

   Nescience  is  from  Latin  nescire,  "not to know," from ne-,
   "not"  +  scire, "to know." It is related to science. Nescient
   is the adjective form.

References

   1. http://www.theatlantic.com/
   2. http://www.nytimes.com/
   3. http://www.thenewrepublic.com/

_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._

You are currently subscribed to Dictionary.com Word of the Day as:
matt.motley@enron.com

To subscribe to the list by email, send a blank message to:
join-WordoftheDay@lists.lexico.com

To unsubscribe via email, send a blank message to:
leave-wordoftheday-357530C@lists.lexico.com

Subscriptions can be turned on and off from the Web at
http://www.dictionary.com/wordoftheday/list/

Dictionary.com Word of the Day
http://www.dictionary.com/wordoftheday/
(C) 2002 by Lexico Publishing Group, LLC.


she lies


ONLY 450!  Why, I thought you guys hit 450 a long time ago.

Marie Heard
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron Broadband Services
Phone:  (713) 853-3907
Fax:  (713) 646-8537
Marie_Heard@Enron.net

	Tana Jones@ECT
	09/19/00 05:34 PM

		 To: Marie Heard/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: Arizona Public Service Company

Well, I do believe this makes 450!  A nice round number if I do say so myself!
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 09/19/2000 05:34 PM -----

	Susan Bailey
	09/19/2000 05:30 PM

		 To: Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laurel
Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea R Guillen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry Joe
Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jarrod Cyprow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gordon
Heaney/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Janie Aguayo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Derek
Bailey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Diane Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron, Kevin
Meredith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Tackett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Celeste Cisneros/NA/Enron@Enron, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nidia
Mendoza/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rod
Nelson/LON/ECT@ECT, Tracy Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT, John Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russell
Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Wendi LeBrocq/Corp/Enron@Enron, Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron@Enron, James L
Copeland/HOU/ECT@ECT, Veronica Espinoza/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Veronica
Gonzalez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jane Wilhite/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Radous/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Robert Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron, Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary
Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie
Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marilyn
Colbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane Ellstrom/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lynn E Shivers/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jason Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anthony
Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Carrie Southard/LON/ECT@ECT, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice
Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amber Ebow/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Adnan Patel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda S
Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bridgette Anderson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stacey
Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Arizona Public Service Company

We have received an executed Master Agreement:

Type of Contract:  ISDA Master Agreement (Multicurrency-Cross Border)

Effective Date:   September 8, 2000

Enron Entity:   Enron North America Corp.

Counterparty:   Arizona Public Service Company

Transactions Covered:  Approved for all products with the exception of:
Weather
          Foreign Exchange
          Pulp & Paper

Special Note:  The Counterparty has three (3) Local Business Days after the
receipt of a Confirmation from ENA to accept or dispute the Confirmation.
Also, ENA is the Calculation Agent unless it should become a Defaulting
Party, in which case the Counterparty shall be the Calculation Agent.

Susan S. Bailey
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, Suite 3806A
Houston, Texas 77002
Phone: (713) 853-4737
Fax: (713) 646-3490
E:mail:  Susan.Bailey@enron.com


I bet Martin is going to have a different Company Code and Legal Cost Code
than London.  His info in the computer also isn't complete.  Can you track
that down for me.  Thanks!


Though many of you already know, today is my last day here at Enron.  I am leaving to pursue my culinary interests full time and have accepted a baking/pastry apprenticeship with the Deer Valley Resort in Park City, Utah for the winter season.

I am happy to have spent the past 3 years working with such a fun and intelligent group of people. I sincerely wish all of you the best in your future endeavors.

Please don't hesitate to look me up if you are in the Park City area, vacation planning, or considering some radical career change like this...ha.  It would be great to see old friends up there.  Forwarding info is below:

http://www.deervalley.com/winter/winterhome.asp
Email: moshuffle@hotmail.com
Cellular: 713-516-0651


Kate,

Please approve and autoschedule.

Annuity 595779 on 1/31/2001. This is a profit transfer from the STSW book to
the Services book.

Les


Mike - thanks I got it eventually.

The only thing I would add at this stage would be under "Daily Management P&L
and position reporting..."

"Key positional and valuation data delivered to corporate risk aggregation
system ("RisktRAC") by a pre - determined time"

The form and content of that data I outlined in my last tome.

This will allow us to (amongst other things) get the positions aggregated and
perform some level of assessment, and allow you folks to kill the spreadsheet
you currently use to calculate VAR, because RisktRAC has the VAR engine.

DP

Mike Jordan
15/06/2000 13:44
To: John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Steve W Young/LON/ECT@ECT, Fernley
Dyson/LON/ECT@ECT, Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Doorstep meeting - additional action steps

the missing attachment !!!!!!

Please note that these are the controls primarily associated with the Middle
Office.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Jordan/LON/ECT on 15/06/2000 13:40
---------------------------

Mike Jordan
15/06/2000 13:34
To: John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Steve W Young/LON/ECT@ECT, Fernley
Dyson/LON/ECT@ECT, Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Doorstep meeting - additional action steps

From our meeting yesterday I noted the following additional action steps (
not recorded within report )

Immediate

Define a summary of fundamental controls on one page  - that can be reviewed
on a cross functional basis ( Commercial, Commercial Support and RAC - the
execute, control and review functions ) - timetable
draft summary schedule - done

Separately get business controllers and RAC management to rate each business
by control point ( Red, Amber or Green ) by next Thursday and arrange joint
meetings with Commercial on businesses that have a poor assessment or
significantly different assessments - Action Mike Jordan and Steve Young

Others as soon as possible
Follow up on status of investment required for Weather business in Oslo -
Action Mike Jordan
Investigate reporting of trades not captured on trade date within DPR on a
daily basis  - Action Mike Jordan
Establish accountability for existing process for creating authorised trader
list  - Action Steve Young
Change process for publishing authorisation list  - placing it on commercial
bulleting board - and reference location within DPR - Action Mike Jordan
Generate an update of status re Master ISDA - Action Steve Young and
investigate possibility of flagging this status within GCP  - Action Mike
Jordan
Determine current EOL straight through process rate ( STP ) across bridges to
risk management systems  - Action Mike Jordan
Define summary information on Coal/P&P etc businesses for inclusion in DPR
for supervisory review by John

Regards

mike


i wont tell.  you could be sakora pine.  that is a pretty good porn name.


Hey guys, I'm sorry this is such short notice - Actually my roommate just
threw it on me this morning that we were having the party this soon.  I
obviously was not able to send this to everyone I would like to invite so
feel free to spread the word.
Regardless, here are the details...

It's a cocktail party so the attire is business casual to semi formal.
The date is Saturday, December 2nd.
Entertainment will once again be provided by the band; 8th Ave. Instinct.
(I will be collecting suggestions for a new name for the band :)
Start showing up around 7pm - That's close to when the band will start.
We're thinking more along the lines of an acoustic session this time in an
effort to avoid any Grinch's a.k.a. Pigs.
No cover.  *We're just asking that everyone bring a bottle of their own
boos.*  We'll provide the mixers and some boos of our own.

Here is our address and directions for those of you who did not make it to
the last party...
4802 SW Vacuna St., Portland.   Ph: 503-246-1700
If you're coming from Portland go South on Barbur Blvd. towards Tigard.
Turn Left on to Capital Hwy.  Go up less then 3/4 of a mile (Capital Hwy.
turns into 49th St.) and see 7-11 on right hand side.  Our street is 4 or 5
streets after 7-11, on the left.
Turn Left on to Vacuna St.  (If you get to PCC Sylvania, you've gone too
far.)  Our place is the 4th house on the right side.

I'd love to see all of you there.  We're hoping for a turn-out like our last
party so again, feel welcome to bring whoever.
See you then, if not sooner!

Katie Trullinger
Wilshire Credit Corporation (REO Dpt.)
800-776-0100 x7804
katie.trullinger@wfsg.com


PROCESSING

26758	Duke		Eff 3/1-3/31/02	40,000/d	Swap RP Vol		Processing

27496	Reliant	Extend to 3/31/02	30,000/d	SJ Pool to Blmfld	Processing

TENDERED

02-062	Questar	Eff 1/1/02		Interconnect & Operating K	  	EXECUTED

25374	Oneok		Extend to 3/31/02	12,000/d	Panhdle to Beav #1	EXECUTED

26471	PPL		Eff RR In-Service	20,000/d	Swap RP Vol		EXECUTED

27420	WTG		Extend to 3/31/02	2,584/d	Panhdle to Winkler	EXECUTED

27642	Calpine	Eff RR In-Service	40,000/d	Swap RP Vol		EXECUTED

27803	BP		1/1/03-12/31/04	25,000/d	Blmfld to Needles	EXECUTED

27821	Cinergy	2/1-2/28/02		5,000/d	Cen Pool to Topock	Negotiating 2/1

27834	WGR		4/1/02-10/31/02	5,000/d	WTx Pl to PG&E Topk	EXECUTED

27835	WGR		11/02 - 12/03		10,000/d	WTx Pl to Socal	EXECUTED

27847	Tenaska	2/26/02 only		10,000/d	WTx Pl to Halley	EXECUTED

27847	Tenaska	Extend to 2/27/02	10,000/d	WTx Pl to Halley	EXECUTED

27848	Sempra		3/1-3/31/02(LFT)	15,000/d	Blmfld to Southwest	EXECUTED


Any chance of getting the confirms to say "Ashland Inc. through its Ashland
Specialty Chemicals Comapny division"?

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Tana Jones                           12/15/99 10:26 AM

To: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly
Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob
Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Ashland Speciality Chemicals Company, a division of Ashland Inc.

Per my conversation with Frank, we are opening up the referenced counterparty
to trade financial under the division name  indicated above.


Thank you for attending our first users' meeting. We appreciate your
interest and commitment in building liquid, accurate hourly instruments that
will serve your companies' requirements. It is our mission to provide
accurate, unbiased indexes that include the greatest number of applicable
participants possible.

The attached hub definitions and methodology for the Cinergy hub -- a result
of dozens of interviews with market participants -- have been in place since
last September. As you're well aware, numerous traders have done index deals
and swaps off our hourly indexes.

If you want to trade off these indexes via instant messaging, please reply
with your instant messaging address, and whether you'd like to see us
develop a forum for such trading. You may also contact your favorite online
trading platform representatives re: offering hourly financial swaps.

Bobette

Bobette Riner
Director, Traders News Indexes
TradersNews Energy
713/647-8690
FAX: 713/647-7552
cell: 832/428-7008
bobette.riner@ipgdirect.com
http://www.tradersnewsenergy.com

----- Original Message -----
From: Ellen Clardy <ellen.clardy@ipgdirect.com>
To: Bobette Riner <bobette.riner@ipgdirect.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 12:52 PM

>
>
>
> Ellen Clardy, Ph.D.
> Power Markets Analyst
> TradersNews
> 713/647-6603
> ellen.clardy@ipgdirect.com
>
>

 - AEP Index Methodology.doc
 - Cinergy Index Methodology.doc
 - All Hub Methodology.doc


I believe this draft reflects Herman's comments:

Kay


4/30/02  8:25 AM - Janelle said they would send the money today.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Monday, April 29, 2002 1:52 PM
To:	Germany, Chris; Hamic, Priscilla; Polsky, Phil
Cc:	Barbe, Robin; McMichael Jr., Ed
Subject:	RE: CMS payment for March 2002 production

Ed, this is what we discussed.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Monday, April 29, 2002 1:29 PM
To:	Hamic, Priscilla; Polsky, Phil
Cc:	Barbe, Robin
Subject:	CMS payment for March 2002 production

I just spoke with Janelle Shaunghnessy (517-768-2076) at CMS Marketing regarding our March 2002 production invoice to them.  The invoice is for the 50,000 dth per day of Michcon Storage gas that we were selling CMS.  The total amount is $3,695,975.00.

According to Janelle she has not received the invoice yet so I just faxed it to her at 517-768-2110.  She said that they should be able to make the payment tomorrow.

1:28 PM, I just confirmed that Janelle received the faxed invoice.


Joe,

This is the name and number of the attorney we talked about and the name of
the person referring you (Jenn, who works with me, is George's future
daughter-in-law).  Hope this helps - keep me posted buddy.

D-

>>> Jennifer Garnett 11/26/00 09:01PM >>>
713.940.6003


MINANA files of JAN&FEB 2002 for FENNER has been loaded.For jan2002 large
gaps are there in the data due to turbines not containing full months data
and also some turbines started from 22nd jan and other from 27th jan.
For JAN 2002 turbine 7 is having less number of records due to duplication of
records.

For FEB2002 turbine15 started data from 7th feb were as other turbines are
having from 4th feb.That is the reason it is having less number of records.

Total number of records are 51484.Please look at the data and let me know if
any problems are there.


Kristi said you called on Saturday.  I was golfing.  What did you think about
the draft?  I thought LD was a good college player, but not great.  Everyone
seems to think he will be an All-Pro type player before he's done.  As long
as he works hard, I think SR would make the best Pro.  But what do I know?

DG


Are you going to be here for Christmas?


Andrew,  Attached is the form of LOI for your review.


Spoke w/Claudia


I spoke the Steve say this am.  I've asked him to revisit the idea of
allowing the WIC capacity to be re-leased to Huber as a pre-arranged deal
(not subject to bidding).  I think he see's my logic and will accommodate us;
however, Steve wants to run it by his regulatory people.

With regard to the CIG space, when Huber releases the capacity back to us, it
looks like we will probably have to go the route of "first bidder meeting
minimum terms" or release the capacity on a recallable basis.  I've asked him
about contingencies to the bid to ensure ENA's gets the capacity.  I asked
him to look into a possible release scenario with a prearranged "first bidder
meeting minimum terms" whereby, ENA has a right to match in the event a third
party is the "first bidder".  I don't feel real confident that CIG will allow
this.  I follow-up when I get more info.

chris
x31666


---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 05/01/2000 05:28
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Nedre Strambler                           05/01/2000 10:49 AM

To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Senior Legal Spec. - Posting No. 103079

Mark,

Her resume looks good.

Nedre
31659
---------------------- Forwarded by Nedre Strambler/HOU/ECT on 05/01/2000
11:48 AM ---------------------------

"Boyd, Samantha M" <sboyd@AKINGUMP.COM> on 04/28/2000 05:06:50 PM
To: "'nedre.strambler@enron.com'" <nedre.strambler@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Senior Legal Spec. - Posting No. 103079

 - CoverLetter.ENRON.doc


The report named: West Power/Gas Heat Rates <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=32&report_name=West+Power/Gas+Heat+Rates&category_cd=6&category_name=WEST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=6&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=10/23/2001>, published as of 10/23/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


The Commission issued a draft decision yesterday (September 4) on DWR's
revenue requirement.  While the Commission had been scheduled to vote on the
revenue requirement at tomorrow's (September 6) meeting, the vote has been
postponed to allow for comments on the PD.  Comments are due on September
11th.  Cmmr. Lynch stated at her press conference held today that it  was
her intent to vote on the PD no later than the next regularly scheduled
Commission meeting on September 20th, and perhaps earlier if a continuation
meeting can be scheduled.

The PD approves the entirety of DWR's requested revenue requirement of $12.6
less the costs of certain demand side management programs which are not
included as "authorized costs" under AB1X.  The PD does not follow DWR's
approach of a pro rata allocation of the revenue requirement among the three
UDCs.  Rather the PD follows a "cost of service" approach.  The PD allocates
DWR's energy procurement costs on a geographic basis, depending on whether
the energy is delivered over facilities in northern California or Southern
California (Transmission Path 15 is the line of demarcation).  Energy
sources procured north of Path 15 are allocated to PG&E customers and those
procured south of Path 15 are allocated to SCE and SDG&E customers.  The
result of such allocation is to have 54% of DWR costs allocated to PG&E, 33%
to SCE and 13% to SDG&E.  Each of the UDCs are then allocated the same
percentage of bond proceeds.  In revenue requirement terms this means that
for the period of January 17, 2001 through December 31, 2002, PG&E is
allocated $6.53 billion; SCE is allocated $4.01 billion and SDG&E is
allocated $1.53 billion.

Along with the revenue requirement allocation, the PD adopts a DWR charge
for each UDC.  The UDCs are directed to begin dispersing payment to DWR
based on the relevant DWR charge for each kWh sold by DWR to the UDC's
customer.  For PG&E this charge is 13.99 cents/ kWh; for SCE the charge is
10.03 cents/kWh; and for SDG&E the charge is 9.02 cents/kWh.  The PD also
notes that given the fact that PG&E's DWR charge is  !3.99 cents it may need
to remit to DWR an additional 4  cents for each kWh that was provided to its
customers by DWR since June 1 until this order becomes effective.

As for the necessity of raising PG&E and SCE rates to account for the DWR
revenue requirement, the PD states that such a determination cannot be made
until a decision on the revenue requirement for the UDCs' retained
generation is issued.  That proposed  decision is due out later this month.

If you have any questions or would like a copy of the order, please contact
me.

Jeanne Bennett


Late Wednesday, FERC issued a notice scheduling the Staff Conference focusing
on pipeline affiliate issues.  The roundtable conference will take place on
Wednesday, January 31 at 1:00 p.m. (note that FERC does not intend for this
to be an all-day conference).  Preliminary comments and requests to
participate are due by January 5, 2001.  [There is an INGAA Regulatory Policy
Committee meeting this Thursday, November 30, in Washington, DC, in which the
pipelines' approach to this conference will be discussed and organized.
Shelley Corman is Chair of that committee.}

The purpose of the conference, as stated in Order No. 637, is to discuss how
changes in the natural gas market may impact the Commission's regulation of
pipelines and their affiliates and non-affiliates, as well as capacity
holders and their affiliates, capacity managers and agents.  The conference
is structured as a roundtable debate with no opening remarks from
participants, though Staff requests parties to "provide input on how to
structure the discussion."  Over the past month or so, Staff has spoken with
industry representatives on the structure of this conference, aware that the
subject matter lends itself to the possibility of an unproductive grudge
match among industry sectors.  Staff is requesting comments before the
roundtable to inform the structure and substance of the roundtable as led by
Staff.

The notice asks that parties submit written comments by January 5th to
identify issues and examples to foster a meaningful dialog and to suggest
questions the Staff moderator may wish to pose to the panel.  Comments should
include a one-page single spaced position summary and whether the commentor
is interested in participating in the roundtable.  Like-minded entities are
encouraged to select one spokesperson (ie, pipelines, LDCs, producers).

The broad question in the notice is whether the current standards of conduct
need to be eliminated, expanded or modified based on the changing nature of
the industry, and whether there should be uniform standards for all holders
of pipeline capacity, or do distinctions need to be made in the treatment of
affiliate relationships (and ownership rules) between the gas and electric
industries.

The notice also delineates some specific areas of concern for comment.
Boiling them down to the main questions, these are:

(1) Current Regulatory Approach:  Are current standards effective; discuss
successful or unsuccessful experiences; do current reporting mechanisms allow
for effective affiliate market activity monitoring?

(2) Potential Concerns:  Whether and when do affiliate transactions pose the
potential for anticompetitive or discriminatory effects, or explain why such
effects are not likely?  PROVIDE EXAMPLES OR SCENARIOS.  Do different types
of affiliates (LDC, gas/power marketer, power gen, asset manager) pose
different risks?  What are the effects of the changing market conditions, and
is there potential for market or consumer benefits from affiliate
transactions?

(3) Potential Approaches:  Are there better methods to regulate affiliate
transactions beyond the standards of conduct and reporting requirements?
What are costs and potential adverse impacts of the following possible
alternatives: open and fair bidding procedures; prohibitions on affiliates
holding capacity on affiliated pipelines; limits on affiliate capacity market
share; changes to open-season bidding to break-up large capacity packages;
divestiture of affiliates.  "Similar approaches could be considered for
affiliates of non-pipeline capacity holders."   Comment on the following
possible adverse impacts of such alternatives: risk of unsubscribed capacity;
potential cost shifts; lack of affiliate contracts to underpin new
construction projects.

The full FERC notice (PL00-1-000, November 22, 2000) is attached here.


Frazier and Dari:  Elizabeth Brown and Rita Bianchi have asked whether we
need to include our so-called "pool" contracts on TW's index of customers.
These are FTS-1 agreements which have a reservation charge of $0 for transfer
from a pool to a point within the pool (involving no actual movement of
gas).  Historically TW has categorized such agreements as "administrative"
and has not included them on the index of customers.  Apparently we need the
contracts to exist as FTS-1 agreements for internal purposes.

I suppose the question has come up again in Elizabeth's and Rita's review of
our postings for Order 637 purposes:  whether the two "pool" contracts (Amoco
and Burlington) need to be included on the Index of Customers.  I suppose
that technically they should be since they are called FTS-1 agreements.
However, I have very little heartburn with continuing to leave them off the
list since no transportation is ever involved.

My main concern is that we be consistent among the pipelines, in order to
simplify the maintenance of our websites.  Please let me know what you think,


Michelle.

I got your message and I saw this e-mail. Tks.

I do not have the details, but  I think the impact on Enron's bottomline is grossly overstated. I have different numbers and assumptions. Our long position gets washed out with the proposal agreed with BNDES. Waiving the rights for Annex V may be the only practical solution. I do not know. But the financial impact is significant for Elektro. Houston should have the right numbers to support (or not) this decision.
LM

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Blaine, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 1:11 PM
To:	Maurer, Luiz
Subject:	FW: ESA government negotiations/ corrected

This is the email, but I don't have any details.  I'll call you later.
Thanks!
Michelle
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Novak, John
Sent:	Thursday, November 22, 2001 12:23 AM
To:	Blaine, Michelle
Subject:	ESA government negotiations/ corrected

---------------------- Forwarded by John Novak/SA/Enron on 11/22/2001 03:22 AM ---------------------------

 << OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >>
Orlando Gonzalez
11/13/2001 07:18 PM
To:	James A Hughes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John J Lavorato/Enron@EnronXGate, Stanley Horton/Enron@EnronXGate, Richard Shapiro/Enron@EnronXGate, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT
cc:	sergio.assad@enron.com, Brett R Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron, Joao.Carlos.Albuquerque@enron.com, britaldo.soares@enron.com, John Novak/SA/Enron@Enron

Subject:	ESA government negotiations/ corrected

Disegard previous e-mail.
We  reached a conceptual agreement with the government representatives on Sunday night.  The main points are:

     1. Rationing losses:   Defined methodology giving distribution companies recovery over the next 36 months of rationing losses realised   from June 01 until the end of rationing in 02. Recovery includes financial compensation. Immediate funding of 80% through BNDES, with Brazilian government funds. Loans liquidated over the 3 year period as tariff increases are realised.  Funding scheduled by December 15th.  Elektro Ebitda impact of approximately R$163 million or US$ 63 million. Corrected numbers in second email

       2.  April/May MAE settlement :   Market will settle under current rules due to pre-rationing conditions, confirming the procedures used on Elektro's books.  Impact of approximately R$ 18 million or US$ 7 million.

       3.  Parcel  "A" for the future:  All non-controlable costs to which LDC's are subjected to including power purchases, sector charges, are passed through to final tariffs either using a tracking account mechanism or by aligning adjustment dates with  the LDC tariff revision date.  Tracking account will be subject to financial compensation from the date costs are incurred until the effective pass through and collection , eliminating a major risk for the distribution sector. Elektro Ebitda impact  2002 forward of R$ 60 million or US$ 19 million, as had been considered in the 2002 plan.  This methodology represents major risk mitigation going forward, as the initial power supply contracts are renewed starting in 2003.

        4. Parcel A from the past:   Min Parente has agreed to the concept recovering non controllable  that were not passed through to tariffs since late 1999 using the same methodology agreed to for future recoveries and has a dedicated team from the Federal Attorney General's office targeting a final solution in ten days.    Elektro impact  is R$145 million or US$ 55 million in 2001. The proposed mechanism for recovery is after the 36 months for the rationing losses.

We are currently finalising a memo of understanding and the government team is winding up the settlement with the generators in order to finalize the terms of the overall agreement.

Min Parente has committed to resolving the open issues affecting investors in the power sector.  These  agreements represent a major step forward, significantly improving  the value of our businesses. By  solving the pending issues for the rationing losses, thus eliminating the Annex 5 controversy the MAE should function normally, allowing us to operate Eletrobolt and settle against the pool.

Total amounts for the sector represent about R$ 10 billion or US$3.8 billion at the current rates.  Our team has led the sector negotiations for months since the rationing, and have been instrumental in convincing the government of the need for implementing these changes.


The NYISO is reserving hours beginning 10:00, 17:00, and 23:00 in the
January 30, 2002 Real-Time Market.

Prices in the January 31, 2002 Day-Ahead Market are correct.

Please note that Market Monitoring will no longer be reserving prices due
to ECA-B.  Code modifications were made on December 20th to incorporate
into the Real-Time price, the BME price in the presence of congestion.  The
incorporation is now an automatic process that is prescribed by the NYISO
tariffs.  This message will appear in price reservation announcements
through January 31, 2002.

This e-mail information is a copy of the official posting which can be
found at the following address of our website:
http://mis.nyiso.com/public/htm/OperMessages/CurrentOperMessages.htm#mm

---
You are currently subscribed to nyiso_tie as: benjamin.rogers@enron.com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-nyiso_tie-628650Q@lyris.nyiso.com


Sure.

From: Jeff Dasovich on 04/09/2001 02:42 PM CDT
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject:

I need to send a copy of a report to:

Greg Blue
Dynegy
5976 W. Las Positas Blvd.
Suite 200
Pleasanton, CA  94588

Could you stop by and pick it up when you get a minute?  Thanks a million.

Jeff


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

December 08, 2000 5:00pm through December 11, 2000 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.

EI:   SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:  No Scheduled Outages.

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET: No Scheduled Outages.

MESSAGING:   SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS: HR   SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

OTHER SYSTEMS: UNIX     SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

OTHER SYSTEMS: REMEDY
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 12/8/2000 at  5:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 12/8/2000 at  5:15:00 PM CT
 Fri 12/8/2000 at  3:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 12/8/2000 at  3:15:00 PM PT
 Fri 12/8/2000 at  11:00:00 PM London thru Fri 12/8/2000 at  11:15:00 PM
London
Outage:  RmailSniffer
Environments Impacted:  All
Purpose: Review of Mail logs has shown that between 7:00 p.m. and 9:00 p.m.
50% of mail messages fail.  The update will copy failed messages to another
directory for an admin to process.
Backout: Reset RmailSniffer service to original settings.
Contact(s):  Carlos Perez    713-345-708
  Christian Smerz   713-345-7410

SITARA:  No Scheduled Outages.

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY:   SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:  No Scheduled Outages.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center
(713) 853-5536   Information Risk Management

Specific Applications Help:
Unify On-Call      (713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call     (713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS   (713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP    (713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR      (713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support      (713) 327-3893  [Pager]


Happy New Year!

I'm available all day except 200-330.

Thanks,

Kay

Lisa Bills
12/27/2000 11:21 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: FW: Draft Bill of Sale

Here's the bill of sale I promised to you.  Why don't you arrange a call/mtg
with Rose and me to discuss form of notice/information.  We should probably
start with the WestLB Purchase Option Assignment and Assumption form and
redraft it to include what we want and think the bank will require in
addition to what they asked for.

Lisa
---------------------- Forwarded by Lisa Bills/Corp/Enron on 12/27/2000 11:19
AM ---------------------------

KWiemer@milbank.com on 12/22/2000 05:15:58 PM
To: lisa.bills@enron.com, roseann.engeldorf@enron.com, mmckay@velaw.com
cc:

Subject: FW: Draft Bill of Sale

And here is the bill of sale, also opened and saved on our system. If Mike
had a more recent version of this I don't think we got it. - KW

-----Original Message-----
From:?? McKay, Michael (NY) [SMTP:mmckay@velaw.com]
Sent:?? Saturday, December 09, 2000 1:56 PM
To:???? Wiemer Karl (E-mail); Michalchuk Daniel (E-mail)
Cc:???? Lisa Bills (E-mail); Roseann Engeldorf (E-mail); Tweed Shelia
(E-mail); Vrielink, Cliff; Woodworth, Thomas
Subject:??????? Draft Bill of Sale

I attach a draft Bill of Sale to be attached as Exhibit 7.1 to the DCMA.
Please note that it remains subject to comment by Enron.

Thank you.

Michael McKay
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P
1325 Avenue of the Americas
New York, N.Y. 10019
Tel:?????? 917-206-8115
Fax:????? 917-849-5311
Mobile:? 203-243-5681
Email:???? mmckay@velaw.com

?<<NewYork_13338_2.DOC>>
????????? ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.? This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above.? If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited.? If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system.? Thank You <<NewYork_13338_2.DOC>>

This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee
or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify
the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer.

 - NewYork_13338_2.DOC


attached.  Edits, comments etc. most welcome.  As Paul knows, I'm hoping to
publish this sometime this spring.  One other thing you guys should be aware
of is that I have been working this with the environmental community almost
from the inception and have their strong support.  I designed the concept to
appeal across a broad coalition, recognizing that I may NOT be able to get
Commission support and so had better have broad customer/stakeholder support.
I don't know where you all are with the environmental community but I wanted
to mention this.  Hope to see you soon.


-----Original Message-----
From: Barry, Penny [mailto:barryp@bp.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 5:00 PM
To: Fuller, Dave
Subject: RE: EPNG Space

Hi Dave,

As we've been running our numbers on this proposal, I was curious if your
offer of $13MM factors in any kind of tax make-up for the up-front payment?
I'm continuing to try to identify where we have differences in value so we
can discuss further tomorrow.  By the way, I think there will be 3 to 4 of
us tomorrow:

Myself
Tim Miller - Origination (Southwest)
Bill Burden - Business Development Gas and Power
Kim Colburn - Business Development Gas and Power

Give me a call and we can set up a place to meet in front of the restaurant
- they won't seat anyone until everyone is there anyway.

Penny
-----Original Message-----
From: Fuller, Dave [mailto:Dave.Fuller@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 1:53 PM
To: Barry, Penny
Subject: RE: EPNG Space

Penny,

We do not have a hard deadline for placing this capacity, however, some
of it has already been spoken for.   We could do something as early as
Nov 01 but I understand that may be a bit aggressive.  Our offer
currently stands at about $13MM for 100,000/day, Nov 01 - May 06.  We
will look to you to take on the obligation for that payment or make us a
counter offer.  We would be happy to sit down with you as early as next
week to work through any questions or issues.  I hope that answers your
question, please let me know if it doesn't.

Dave

PS - I'll be in Houston next week if a meeting would be useful.

-----Original Message-----
From: Barry, Penny [mailto:barryp@bp.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 1:06 PM
To: Fuller, Dave
Subject: RE: EPNG Space

Dave,

Just wanted to clarify what kind of deadline your aiming for with this
transport proposal.  The reason I am asking is I have taken this to the
next
level and we will probably need several days to run through our internal
processes.  I know you are working with multiple parties so if you let
me
know how you would like to proceed then we can be working on a similar
timeline.

Thanks,  Penny

-----Original Message-----
From: Fuller, Dave [mailto:Dave.Fuller@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 4:59 PM
To: Barry, Penny
Subject: RE: EPNG Space

Sorry its taking me so long the guy I need to tlk to is out.  I'll get
you the particulars tomorrow.

Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: Barry, Penny [mailto:barryp@bp.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 11:25 AM
To: Fuller, Dave
Subject: RE: EPNG Space

Dave, you also mentioned space on TW - do you have any more information
on
this?

Thanks, Penny

-----Original Message-----
From: Fuller, Dave [mailto:Dave.Fuller@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 9:49 AM
To: barryp@bp.com
Subject: EPNG Space

Hey Penny,

One more thought on the EPNG capacity valuation we've been discussing...
physical gas in the San Juan is selling at a discount to index,
therefore we are incorporating that into our valuation.  I thought you
might want to consider that as well.

Thanks,

Dave Fuller
Enron North America
503-464-3732

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence
a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


David:  check out the second attachment.  Thanks, as always.  Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 06/09/2000 08:27 AM -----

	"Scott Eckas" <SECKAS@cwt.com>
	05/08/2000 09:26 AM

		 To: sara.shackleton@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Final memorandum regarding pulp and paper transactions

Sara:

Last week I had sent you a final version of the memorandum regarding pulp and
paper transactions (with attachment).  However, this morning I had an
computer-generated error message regarding that transmission.  I am sending
you
the files again just in case you didn't receive them or couldn't open them.

If you would like a hard copy, please e-mail me back and I will send you a
set.
Thanks.

Scott Eckas
212-504-6968

(See attached file: 0463515.04)(See attached file: 0464504.01)

|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|NOTE:  The information in this email is confidential and may be   |
|legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you   |
|must not read, use or disseminate the information.  Although this |
|email and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or |
|other defect that might affect any computer system into which it  |
|is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient |
|to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted |
|by Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft for any loss or damage arising in|
|any way from its use.                                             |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|

 - 0463515.04
 - 0464504.01


John, I read Phil's statements concerning the Redrock air permit issue and
would like to shed some additional light concerning the reason why
Transwestern  did not know about the delay in the agencies issance of the air
permits.  I had met with each agency prior to submitting each application to
ensure that each application contained the correct and proper information
required by the EPA and State of Arizona.  When I told them that we were
expecting the permits by the end of September, each agency indicated that a
September permit issuance would not be a problem, in light of the fact that
energy issues were to be given top priority in the State of Califonia.   I
phoned the  permit engineer assigned to each application monthly to be kept
aware of possible conflicts and resolve any concerns.  In all monthly calls,
both agencies assured me that things were progressing on schedule.  As we
approached the anticipated September issuance, calls to the agencies were
conducted weekly and this was when I found out about the 1-4 month additional
time which would be required for the permit issuance.  I dont know what else
could have been done to track and alleviate problems encountered to ensure
that the permits would be issued in a timely manner.


Gerald, I got this but hadn't gotten it earlier in the week. There must
have been a problem with the e-mail connection.  I will ask Don Schultz
to contact you by tomorrow on this.  Thanks.

>>> <Gerald.Nemec@enron.com> 03/15/01 03:08PM >>>

----- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 03/15/2001 04:08 PM -----

                    Gerald Nemec

                                         To:
tbuffington@hollandhart.com
                    03/12/2001           cc:

                    03:53 PM             Subject:     Purchase Contract

Terry,  Attached is a typical form that was executed.   Specifically
Section 3.3 under which we will be curtail are takes from the Producers
and
any requirements to take pro rata from producers in Wyoming.  Thanks.
Any
possibility of getting feedback by tommorrow.  Thanks.

(See attached file: PetrogulfGPA1.doc)


Attached please find an updated power credit watchlist dated 12/11/00.
Please direct any comments/questions to the credit hotline, (713) 853-1803

Veronica Gonzalez


John,

Yes. I have additional info about this transaction.

Vince

John Sherriff
05/16/2000 10:47 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: LNG May 19 decision

Thanks Vince - I understand we are on at 1PM your time today to review this.

John

Vince J Kaminski
16/05/2000 14:48
To: John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: LNG May 19 decision

John,

Sorry for the confusion.
This is a second  tanker on which very few details
are available . The LNG group is working as we speak
to provide some information for Joe Sutton before
his departure for Paris this (Tuesday) afternoon.
There is no DASH on this 2nd tanker yet. I asked Dave Gorte
on Monday to send me one and was not told that
he can provide me with the Mystic Lady DASH as  the closest
substitute.

Vince

John Sherriff
05/16/2000 12:20 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: LNG May 19 decision

Vince - thanks for the update.  What I am not sure of is what if any decision
has to be
made on May 19.  It seems to me that the Mystic Lady and Elba Island deals
have already
been approved and executed - but it is quite likely I am missing a detail or
two.

John

Vince J Kaminski
15/05/2000 17:14
To: John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Gorte/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rick
Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: LNG May 19 decision

John,

This is the update on what I have done for the LNG transactions.

1. I was not involved in the LNG ship project. I shall  read the DASH
and give you my comments. Without looking at the details, I think that the
decision
to charter a tanker removes one significant risk we have at the Elba Island
project (please, see point 2).

2. Elba Island. I am working with Doug Rotenberbg, Brad Hitch, Scott Earnest
(Sally Beck's organization) and RAC to set up the book for the Elba Island
transaction. The next step
will be to expand the book to capture all the Enron's LNG-related  positions
in one place and
to look for natural risk offsets and possible hedges. A working group is
meeting to close a few
remaining gaps  tomorrow (Tuesday) at 8:30.

A few comments on the book design and my view of the project:

a. The current thinking is that LNG will be sourced for the Elba Island
facility
by buying marginal cargos on the fob basis. Marginal cargos will represent
supply from excess capacity that has not been committed under long-term
contracts or became available due to some short-term frictions.

The fob cargos are typically selling at a significant discount to the
long-term
contract prices. The economics of the deal, as represented by the book we are
setting up, will reflect the assumption that not only we can locate marginal
cargos
but that we shall be able to do it on a regular basis, arranging shipping and
coordinating
the facility schedule and natural gas transactions in the US. In other words,
we have a significant logistical and operational risk in this transaction.

b. The transaction will cover the period of 17 years (with an extension
option of
5 years). Even if we can lock-in the LNG volumes over this time period, we
have no ability to lock-in the other side of the spread (US gas prices) for
such a long tenor. This is
essentially a tolling transaction with exposure to the LNG - nat gas spread
and
I would not recommend locking-in only one leg of the spread.

One solution would be to  cover, let's say, 50% of he LNG volumes for the
first
5 years and lock-in the nat gas side on the US market side.

c. The book we are setting up will be based on many managerial assumptions
regarding sources of LNG, shipping rates, schedules, etc. I would set up a
big prudence reserve
in case we mark it to market.

d. My group will work on valuation of some options we have in the Elba Island
deal
(that are good for Enron) and on the hedging strategy for the LNG positions.
Long-term LNG contracts are typically based on the Japanese Crude Cocktail
that
correlates very well with Brent.

Vince

John Sherriff
05/14/2000 01:40 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Lauren Urquhart/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: LNG May 19 decision

Vince

I haven't spoken to you for awhile but hope the world is treating you well.
Anyway with Greg moving to his
new role I have (I hope only temporarily) staff trading oversight for the
Eastern Hemishere plus LNG.

I understand that your group is taking a first cut at developing curves for
LNG and LNG ship values.   I also understand
that another LNG ship decision is on the dockets for May 19 (not very far
away).  Anway I understand this
is a big decision but I still have gotten very little info yet.  Can you
please let me know where you stand now?

I will ask my assistant Lauren to set up a time that I can speak with you in
the next couple of days and if you
have anything for me to review before then she can get it faxed to me as well.

Look forward to connecting with you Vince.

John


?Register Today & Golf Free!

The LDC Forum d Winter of 2001
April 19-20, 2001 - Boston, Massachusetts

This year's Forum promises to be the best yet, with a special focus on:
Adequacy of Northeast Supply --- E-commerce --- Power Generation --- New
Project Updates

CLICK HERE!

Register for The LDC Forum or get more information!

www.interchange-energy.com

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The LDC Forum * Winter of 2001
April 19-20, 2001 Boston, Massachusetts

Contact Person: Jerry Ribnick, Interchange Energy Group 763-545-1515

If you prefer to not receive future e-mails regarding The LDC Forums, please
REPLY to this message with REMOVE in the subject field.

If you are unable to clearly read this message format, please REPLY to this
message with RESEND in the subject field.


YEs

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


VERY INTERESTING...
---------------------- Forwarded by Ceci Twachtman/HOU/EES on 11/10/2000
05:23 PM ---------------------------

David Haug@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
11/10/2000 03:19 PM
To: mklepper@skadden.com, Ceci Twachtman@Enron Communications
cc:
Subject: Article

---------------------- Forwarded by David Haug/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
11/10/2000 03:16 PM ---------------------------

Steven Haug@ENRON
11/10/2000 11:07 AM
To: Larry Abbott/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Mike Ames/OTS/Enron@Enron, Mike
Bonnstetter/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Max Brown/OTS/Enron@Enron, rd_cates@yahoo.com,
John Gormley/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Jeff Hamlin/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Danny
Holguin/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Steve Tarter/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Al
Vandarwarka/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Jon Wernette/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Norma
Nusz-Chandler/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Virgil Pfennig/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Gary
Numedahl/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, vdicke@courier.esu11.k12.ne.us, David
Haug/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, haug@tconl.com, vghaug@nque.com,
geoff@tconl.com, karenhaug@hotmail.com, laura.haug@amerus.com,
CindyJ.@prodigy.net, elmo413@carrollsweb.com, Marlene McCoy/ET&S/Enron@ENRON,
daisyd43@hotmail.com, John W Rose/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, omaharoses@hotmail.com,
Norm Ruiz/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, aly_gal@hotmail.com, Neta Zitnik/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Article

DO YOU THINK HE WOULD??
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
 Al Gore and
Constitution
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
, 2000 WorldNetDaily.com

Ever since I saw Al Gore give that uncharacteristically statesman-like speech
defending the integrity of the Electoral College system under the
Constitution of the United States, I've been scratching my head trying to
figure it out.

Who was this guy? Was this the same Al Gore who has demonstrated -- time and
time again -- so little respect for the Constitution during the last eight
years? Why was he giving up on the idea of a challenge to the Electoral
College, when it seemed many in his camp were banking on that as their last
line of defense?

Well, I think I have figured it out. Actually, there are two possibilities.

The first thought that came to me was that this was Al Gore's
"Don't-watch-the-man-behind-the-curtain speech." While he was extolling the
virtues of the Constitution, his minions in Florida -- from Bill Daley to
Jesse Jackson -- were busy subverting it by any means necessary. It was Al
Gore's way of establishing public plausible deniability. He stood above the
fray, while his cohorts did the dirty work.

But, more recently, another thought has occurred to me -- a darker, more
sinister thought. I hope I am wrong. I pray that, this time, I am
overestimating the deviousness of Al Gore. But that, of course, is always a
difficult task.

Think, for a moment, why Al Gore would suddenly be reading and citing the
Constitution.

The answer is that, in this instance, it gives him all the power. What do I
mean?

Who is it, under the Constitution, that is specifically charged with
certifying the Electoral College votes of each state? You guessed it. The
president of the U.S. Senate, which also happens to be the vice president of
the United States. That's right. The day those Electoral College votes go to
the Senate to be counted and certified to choose the next president of these
United States, Al Gore will be holding all the cards.

"Oh, Farah," you say, "you don't think Al Gore would tamper with the results
in any way with the whole world watching, do you?"

Well, let's think about what has been happening in Florida for the last
several days. Al Gore's campaign managers have been whipping up hysteria
stating that the will of the people in that state is being subverted.

They are filing lawsuits. They are organizing marches. They are all but
accusing the Bush campaign of voter fraud.

Listen to what Bill Daley has to say: "More than 100 million Americans voted
on Tuesday and more voted for Al Gore than George Bush. Here in Florida it
also seems very likely that more voters went to the polls believing that they
were voting for Al Gore than for George Bush. If the will of the people is to
prevail Al Gore should be awarded a victory in Florida, and be our next
president of the United States."

They've decided that no matter what the actual vote count shows, Gore wins.

Now, all Gore has to do on that fateful day in the U.S. Senate is reject for
certification the Electoral College votes of Florida, and he wins the
majority and becomes president. Sorry, Bush fans. I don't think there's a
thing you can do about it other than protest, complain and stomp your feet.
Better start planning your legal strategy now. I'll bet Al Gore's transition
team is already hard at work. Barbra Streisand is probably making plans to
sing at the Inauguration. Alec Baldwin is unpacking his bags. This could be a
fait accompli. I guarantee you a counter to this bold move is not in the Bush
campaign's playbook.

The Gore campaign, still working overtime, has laid the groundwork for the
challenge. The Florida vote is tainted, they say. It's too close to call. Too
many irregularities. The vote can simply be dismissed by the constitutional
authority -- Vice President Al Gore.

Would you put it past him? I sure wouldn't.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

Joseph Farah is editor and chief executive officer of WorldNetDaily.com and
writes a daily column.


Absolutely hilarious!!
---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 11/13/2000
02:35 PM ---------------------------

"James Love" <James.Love@msl.redstone.army.mil> on 11/13/2000 02:35:45 PM
To: <Phillip.M.Love@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Fwd: FW: al gore

You'll like this!!!!
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 14:22:20 -0600
From: "Phil Hooper" <Phil.Hooper@msl.redstone.army.mil>
To: <km5km@avsia.com>, "Bob Hammons" <Bob.Hammons@msl.redstone.army.mil>,
"Chuck Murdock" <Chuck.Murdock@msl.redstone.army.mil>, "James Love"
<James.Love@msl.redstone.army.mil>
Subject: Fwd: FW: al gore
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: message/rfc822

Received: from pcgw1.redstone.army.mil by msl.redstone.army.mil; Mon, 13 Nov
2000 13:19:36 -0600
Received: from ssdd-bridge.rdsssd.redstone.army.mil (rdec2.redstone.army.mil
[136.205.28.3]) by pcgw1.redstone.army.mil (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3) with
ESMTP id NAA20356; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 13:19:36 -0600 (CST)
Received: by rdec2.redstone.army.mil with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
id <WL8GJ71Y>; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 13:19:35 -0600
Message-ID:
<B1C3C8115F36D4119FAD00508B608BF20691A2@mrdec-exch5.redstone.army.mil>
From: "Parker, Greg" <Greg.Parker@rdec.redstone.army.mil>
To: "Dillon, John T" <John.Dillon@rdec.redstone.army.mil>,        "Owen, Phil
R"  <Phil.Owen@rdec.redstone.army.mil>,        "Wood, Sam B"
<Sam.Wood@rdec.redstone.army.mil>,        "Stroud, Thomas R"
<Stroud-TR@rdec.redstone.army.mil>,        "Daril Pettit (E-mail)"
<daril.pettit@msl.redstone.army.mil>,        "Darris Mccarrell (E-mail)"
<Darris.Mccarrell@rttc.redstone.army.mil>,        "Darryl Wells (E-mail)"
<darryl.wells@msfc.nasa.gov>,        "Eddie Odom (E-mail)"
<e.odom@sri.org>,        "Fischer1 (E-mail)" <fischer1@ix.netcom.com>,
"Gremillion Danny (E-mail)"  <dannyg@ti.com>,        "Jmercer (E-mail)"
<jmercer@asf.com>,        "Phil Hooper (E-mail)"
<phil.hooper@msl.redstone.army.mil>,        "Phil Lambert (E-mail)"
<Phil.Lambert@rttc.redstone.army.mil>,        "Richard Gibson (E-mail)"
<Richard.Gibson@rttc.army.mil>,        "Strom Ken (E-mail)"
<ken.strom@smdc.army.mil>
Subject: FW: al gore
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 13:20:16 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_000_01C04DA6.C116CA20"

?

?

-----Original Message-----
From: Derek Horst [mailto:dlhorst@bellsouth.net]
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2000 10:45 AM
To: Amy Williams; Lewis White; Darryl Wells; Stan Tillman; Rick Shotts; Mark
Rowe; Kerry Richardson; Harold/Lana Pirtle; Greg Parker; Larry Mustachia;
David Matthews; Lynn Ann Marsh; Chris Lewter; Jerry Kilpatrick; Lonnie Jones;
Mechelle Horst; Ronnie Hayes; John Crow; James Creel; Bobby Chandler; Peggy
Champion
Subject: al gore

?

this is pretty funny. enjoy

?

derek
 - algore.jpg


Terri Clynes is working with compression services (Jean Mrha's group) to convert compressors at one of Nicor's storage fields to  be electric driven. Terri can provide more info. on current status. Hope this helps.

Ed


Hi there.  Will either one of you be able to help me with
this?

Thanks,
Diane

---------------------- Forwarded by Diane Anderson/NA/Enron on 07/13/2000
12:35 PM ---------------------------

Susan Flynn@ECT
07/06/2000 11:42 AM
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Diane Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron, Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Confirmation Letter

 Tan and Susan - can one of you handle this?  I called Diane Anderson and
told her that I'll be leaving Enron and won't be able to help her.  I told
her I would foreward the email on to you.   Thanks!

Susan D. Flynn
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB3806
Houston, Texas  77002
Phone:  713-853-0975
Fax:  713-646-3490
----- Forwarded by Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT on 07/06/2000 11:34 AM -----

	Diane Anderson@ENRON
	07/06/2000 10:58 AM

		 To: Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Confirmation Letter

Susan,

I am working with Joe Hunter to prepare the individual letters to our
counterparties
for the below detailed project.   In order to fill in the blanks in the first
paragraph
of Carol's template, it is necessary for me to know the appropriate section
in
each counterparty's Agreement that references the existing confirmation
procedures
(the "Confirmation Procedures").

Would it be possible for you to provide me with copies of the Master
Agreements
for each of the following counterparties, so I can fill in the blanks and get
these letters
out the door:

Bank One (formerly FNB)
Bankers Trust Company
Barclays Bank PLC
The Chase Manhattan Bank
Citibank, N.A.
Credit Suisse Financial Products
Elf Trading S.A
J.Aron & Company
Paribas
Phibro Inc.
Royal Bank of Canada

I would be happy to come up and retrieve them as soon as you have them ready.
If you have any questions, please give me ( 3-0443) or Joe ( 3-3316) a call.

Thanks - we're looking forward to being able to implement this procedure.
-Diane

---------------------- Forwarded by Diane Anderson/NA/Enron on 07/06/2000
10:25 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Larry Joe Hunter @ ECT                           07/06/2000 08:41 AM

To: Diane Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Confirmation Letter

---------------------- Forwarded by Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT on 07/06/2000
08:40 AM ---------------------------
   Carol St Clair                06/16/2000 09:25 AM

To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy E
Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Confirmation Letter

Joe Hunter has asked me to draft a form of confirmation reply letter that we
could send to our counterparties in lieu of signing their confirmations.
This form of letter with the appropriate chnages could also be used by those
counterparties that we confirm.  Please let me know if you have any comments
on this form or any concerns about implementing this process.  Thanks.
Carol


That would be such a shame if you couldn't go.  You might just have to come
with me again.  Just don't go and not be able to come back.


Notice No. 00-334
September 29, 2000

TO:
ALL NYMEX DIVISION MEMBERS AND MEMBER FIRMS
ALL COMEX DIVISION MEMBERS AND MEMBER FIRMS

FROM: Neal Wolkoff, Executive Vice President

SUBJECT:
Proposed Amendments to the COMEX Silver Futures Contract to Add Brink,s Inc.
and Delaware Depository Service Company, LLC as Exchange Licensed
Depositories.

The Exchange proposes to amend Supplement No. 2, "Licensed Depositories and
Weighmasters for Silver" of the COMEX Silver Futures Contracts to add Brink,s
Inc.,s vault facility located at 652 Kent Avenue, Brooklyn, NY and Delaware
Depository Service Company, LLC,s vault facilities located at 3601 North
Market Street and 4200 Governor Printz Boulevard, Wilmington, DE as licensed
depositories for the storage of silver deliverable against the Exchange,s
COMEX Division Silver Futures Contract.  The proposed amendments must be
approved by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).  The Exchange
membership will be notified when CFTC approval is received and when these
amendments will become effective.

Copies of the proposed amendments are attached. Capital letters indicate
additions, bracketing [ ] indicates deletions.

Should you have any questions regarding the above, please contact Albert J.
Getz at 212-299-2608.

Silver Supplement No. 2 Proposed Rule Amendments
Capital letters indicate additions; [ ] indicate deletions.

Commodity Exchange, Inc.

Licensed Depositories and Weighmasters for Silver

New York

Depository:
ScotiaMocatta Depository,
A Division of The Bank of Nova Scotia
4 World Trade Center
New York, NY 10048
Orders: 212-912-8530

Facilities:
4 World Trade Center
New York, NY

Computer Code: 3002

Depository:
HSBC Bank
1 West 39th Street, SC 2 Level
New York, NY 10018
Orders: 212-525-6439

Facilities:
1 West 39th Street, SC Level 2
New York, NY

Computer Code: 5001

Depository:
BRINK'S INCORPORATED
SUITE 400
580 5TH AVENUE
NEW YORK, NY 10036
ORDERS: 718-260-2200

Facilities:
642 KENT AVENUE
BROOKLYN, NY

Delaware
Depository:
DELAWARE DEPOSITORY SERVICE COMPANY, LLC
3601 NORTH MARKET STREET
WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19802
ORDERS: 302-765-3884

Facilities:
3601 NORTH MARKET STREET
WILMINGTON, DELAWARE

4200 GOVERNOR PRINTZ BLVD.
WILMINGTON, DELAWARE

Additional Licensed Weighmasters For Silver

International Testing Laboratories, Inc.
578-582 Market Street
Newark, NJ 07105
Orders: (201) 589-4772

Ledoux & Company
359 Alfred Avenue
Teaneck, NJ 07666
Orders: NJ (201) 837-7160

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=sara.shackleton@enron.com&
refdoc=(00-334)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


Mark,

Further to mine of June 8th, do you think there is any continuing interest
in your shop for the contract audit matter we discussed?  By the way, was
Enron's building spared in the recent floods that we read about?

Regards,

David

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Yeres, David (Financial Products-NY)
> Sent:	Friday, June 08, 2001 12:19 PM
> To:	'mark.taylor@enron.com'
> Subject:	Proposed Audit Presentation
>
>
>
>
> Mark,
>
> I haven't heard back on scheduling the contract audit presentation. Is
> this on the back burner or have you decided not to proceed at this time?
>
> David Yeres
> Clifford Chance Rogers & Wells
> 200 Park Avenue
> New York, NY 10166
> Tel:   (212) 878-8075
> Fax:  (212) 878-8027
> email:  david.yeres@cliffordchance.com
>
>
>

*******

This message and any attachment are confidential and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure.  If you are not the intended recipient, please telephone or email the sender and delete this message and any attachment from your system.  If you are not the intended recipient you must not copy this message or attachment or disclose the contents to any other person.

For further information about Clifford Chance please see our website at http://www.cliffordchance.com or refer to any Clifford Chance office.


here is the info.  let that chick know.
---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 09/19/2000
09:58 AM ---------------------------

"Marcantel MM (Mitch)" <MMMarcantel@equiva.com> on 09/19/2000 07:27:00 AM
To: "'Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com'" <Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE:

Matt,

Softball starts in 2 weeks on Oct. 3rd. I imagine they'll send out an email
with more info later in the week or possibly beginning of next week. It is a
co-ed non-competitive league, but there are some pretty good players out
there.

later,
Mitch

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2000 2:25 PM
To: MMMarcantel@equiva.com
Subject: RE:

are the softball games tues nights?  when do they start? where are they?  i
need to tell that chick.


Hunterbob and Fletch,

While I was walking today, people were running and walking in their shorts - my Dad's heat is not on.

Happy Belated Thanksgiving!

Mrha