alright what do you want for warrick dunn?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rabon, Chance
Sent:	Wednesday, October 10, 2001 8:10 AM
To:	Bass, Eric
Subject:	RE:

no

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bass, Eric
Sent:	Wednesday, October 10, 2001 8:07 AM
To:	Rabon, Chance
Subject:	RE:

ok alstott and troy brown for holt?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rabon, Chance
Sent:	Wednesday, October 10, 2001 8:06 AM
To:	Bass, Eric
Subject:	RE:

I would want an average wr and a solid back.  you wont be willing to give up either moss or owens, and your remaining backs are not steller(although alstott seems to be doing well.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bass, Eric
Sent:	Wednesday, October 10, 2001 8:02 AM
To:	Rabon, Chance
Subject:	RE:

not my fault - like i knew that jamal was going to blow out his knee - i didn't offer terrell davis.

what do you want for torry?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rabon, Chance
Sent:	Wednesday, October 10, 2001 8:01 AM
To:	Bass, Eric
Subject:	RE:

what about him?  you make me nervous, everyone you offer me for him gets hurt for the rest of the season.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bass, Eric
Sent:	Wednesday, October 10, 2001 7:56 AM
To:	Rabon, Chance
Subject:

torry holt?


Don/Juan:

Any interest?

Thanks,
Johnny

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Delgado, Lydia
Sent:	Thursday, June 28, 2001 2:55 PM
To:	Baughman Jr., Don; Hernandez, Juan; Forney, John M.
Cc:	Palmer, Johnny; Arguijo, Cheryl; Black, Tamara Jae; Phillips, George
Subject:	Final Schedule - Monday, July 2, 2001 - George T. Phillips
Importance:	High

Attached please find the following documents:

Thanks,
Lydia

x3-9338


Attached are the confirmations for 2/02 sales.


As described in my prior email, here is a list of Ludwin's transactions.  Let me know if you have any interest.  Michelle

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Michelle Cash
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3823
Houston, Texas  77002
(713) 853-6401
michelle.cash@enron.com

This message may contain confidential information that is protected by the attorney-client and/or work product privileges.
----- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 06/09/01 12:34 AM -----

	"Bruce Menke" <Bruce@associatedcounsel.com> 05/23/01 02:19 PM Please respond to Bruce 	   To: <Michelle.Cash@enron.com>  cc:   Subject: Mitch Ludwin-Represenatative Transactions List

 Michelle, please find attached the list of Representative Transactions
proved by Mitch.  Bruce Menke

 - transaction list.Ludwin.rtf


Howdy,
Neil Stuchbury from the Toronto office will be in Saturday to observe your
Real Time trading expertise.
Murray has been a consultant for the Enron Toronto office and has offered
Neil a chance to "audit class."

Thanks,

JMF


Attached please find Margaret's document


Attached is our form of Confidentiality Agreement which we would prefer to
use.  If after reviewing our agreement you still prefer to use your own form,
Carol St. Clair, an attorney in our group will have to get back to you with
our comments.   I will wait to hear from you.


David, do not send out any of the information concerning the proprietary data
being collected at ENA finance or other information without first getting the
approval of Legal, Trading, and ENA Finance.  As I mentioned to you, we are
currently in process on the CFTC issues surrounding MG.  Mary

John, per my voice message, please give me a call regarding MG.  Mary

Enron North America Corp.
Mary Cook
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Mary Cook/HOU/ECT on 09/26/2000 11:36 AM -----

	David P Dupre
	09/26/2000 09:43 AM

		 To: Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 bcc:
		 Subject: MG Soliciting Substantial Documentation

To: Jeff Sorenson
           Mary Cook

I received this from Craig Young yesterday of the MG New York office who
visited us Sep. 13-15.

If you review the Word document below, he wants me to gather much information
which
we've been selective in providing to any internal or external party. As you
know, some of this information is being
provided to Sarah Wesner under the direction of John Arnold and John Lavorato.

Given the current tentative status of MG clearing trades, I am not
comfortable in providing this data at this time to MG.

However, if you think that we should be of assistance for their own analysis
to clear/ not to clear trades, please let me know.

Thanks,

David 3-3528

---------------------- Forwarded by David P Dupre/HOU/ECT on 09/26/2000 09:28
AM ---------------------------

Craig Young
09/25/2000 12:33 PM
To: david.dupre@enron.com
cc: Craig Young/NY/ECT@ECT
Subject: Soliciting Houstons Clearing

Thanks for all of your help and here is a copy of my memo and some Rolfe &
Nola
Web system

ttp://www.rolfeandnolan.com/P_ranweb.htm

http://www.rolfeandnolan.com/Press_Docs/press63.htm

Regards
Craig

---------------------- Forwarded by Craig Young/NY/ECT on 09/25/2000 12:05 PM
---------------------------

Craig Young
09/25/2000 10:47 AM
To: Michael J Hutchinson/EU/Enron@Enron
cc: Craig Young/NY/ECT@ECT
Subject: Soliciting Houstons Clearing

h


Thanks Kristin!

	Kristin Albrecht
	07/13/2000 06:51 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject:


got it.  haas mix up.  i'll make the calls.

Best,
Jeff


Hello Everyone.

AEP has been very cooperative with us when we have posted numbers in error on
EOL.  Please extend them back the favor if an issue comes up on their side.
Also please e-mail me if an issue comes up.

Thanks

John


SVMG Energy Committee Members and Electric Infrastructure Team - FYI
************************************

Market Participants:

San Francisco Study Group Members and Cal-ISO Market Participants,

A meeting of the San Francisco Study Group has been scheduled for Tuesday
October 9, 2001.  This meeting is being held to discuss both the status of
various transmission and generation projects in the San Francisco Area, as
well as the initiation of new transmission system studies related to the San
Francisco Area.  The meeting will be held in Conference room 300 on the
third floor of PG&E's 77 Beale Street building in San Francisco.  The
meeting is scheduled from 10 AM to 3 PM.   Lunch will not be provided.  The
draft meeting agenda is attached.

<<Meeting Agenda-Oct9thRev.doc>>

If you have questions regarding the meeting, please contact Larry Tobias at
916-608-5763 or ltobias@caiso.com.

Thanks

Larry Tobias
California ISO
Senior Grid Planning Engineer
Email LTobias@caiso.com
Phone (916) 608-5763
FAX (916) 351-2272
Pager (916) 522-6552


here are a few more items

--
Daniel Casse
White House Writers Group
615-297-5999
615-297-5908 (fax)

 - Jan12humor.DOC


Sorry, I forgot the attachments.


Here are the 3 99's that can be posted on to dealbench.
Ben


ALL CONTRACTS ARE ISDAs:

Enron North America Corp- Contract #95000290
Enron Credit Limited- Contract #96057552
Enron Capital & Trades Resources International Contract #s: 96064558 and 96082938

ENRON CORP GUARANTIES:
3/29/1996 - $50MM covering ENA for financial transactions
3/22/2001 - $50MM coverig ENA, ECTRIC and ECTRL for financial and physical transactions

-DV


There is a master agreement in place between ECT and Koch Energy Trading,
Inc.  I have never heard of Koch Carbon.  My immediate concern is as to the
Enron entity.  It is not clear to me why Peter thinks this trade is between
ECT and a Koch entity since he does not have authority to bind ECT.

Alan B Aronowitz
12/01/98 07:34 PM
To: Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Sefton/LON/ECT@ECT, Yao
Apasu/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Deal 8025

Paul:

Please call me tomorrow morning Houston time to discuss our preparing a
confirmation and other relevant documentation for this petroleum coke-based
financial swap transaction with Koch Carbon, Inc. I understand you (and Yao)
had worked on a similarly structured coal-based swap a few months ago.

Mark: Do we have a financial master with any Koch affiliates?

Alan
---------------------- Forwarded by Alan B Aronowitz/HOU/ECT on 12/01/98
06:58 PM ---------------------------

Brian Spector
12/01/98 11:20 AM
To: Alan B Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Daniel Reck/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Deal 8025

---------------------- Forwarded by Brian Spector/HOU/ECT on 12/01/98 11:19
AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  PETER SCEATS <SCEATS@tfs-ln.co.uk>                           12/01/98
11:13 AM

To: Brian Spector/HOU/ECT, "'Mark Luetters @ Koch Petcoke'"
<luetterm@kochind.com>
cc:
Subject: Deal 8025

Here follows the draft confirm for deal no. 8025.  Subject to hearing from
you otherwise we intend to send you both the hard copy first thing tomorrow.

PETCOKE SWAP CONFIRM

To     :  Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.
   1400 Smith Street
   Houston TX 77002-7361
Attn   : Brian Spector
Phone   : 713 853 4276
Fax    : 713 646 2492

To     : Koch Carbon Inc
   4111 East 37th Street North
   Wichita Kansas 67220
Attn    : Mark Luetters
Phone   : 316 828 4412
Fax    : 316 828 7946

Date   : 1st December 1998

The following deal has been transacted for the above parties' account and
risk by TFS Energy (acting as brokers without the responsibility for
defaults by other parties) and is subject to credit and counterparty
approval.

TFS Deal No. : 8025

Trade Date  : 1st December1998

Fixed Price Leg

Seller    :  Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp

Buyer    :  Koch Carbon Inc

Benchmark
Commodity : High Sulphur Green Coke FOB Gulf Coast Above 50 HGI per
Pace Petroleum Coke Quarterly.

Duration   : 1st December 1998 thru 28th February 1999
inclusive

Quantity   : 5,000 tons per month, 15,000 tons in total

Price   : $ 4.15  per ton fixed and flat

Floating Price Leg

Seller   :  Koch Carbon Inc

Buyer              :  Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp

Pricing : The price of the floating leg of the agreement shall be the
monthly average of High Sulphur Green Coke FOB Gulf Coast Above 50 HGI
appearing in Pace Petroleum Coke Quarterly's Green and Calcined Petroleum
Coke Price table.

Settlement : Monthly. Settlement is due no more than three working days
after the price index for each relevant month becomes available.

Profit & Loss
Limitation  : A collar is placed on the deal at $1.00 either side of the
fixed price such that the total cash payment/receipt cannot exceed $15,000.

Regulation : This contract is governed in accordance with US law.

Other and
Additional Terms : To be agreed between the counterparties.

Commission  : 0.03 cents per ton charged to both sides.

Broker : Peter Sceats, Manager Coal Dept.
 TFS Energy
    East India House
    109/117 Middlesex Street
    London E1 7JF
    Phone  44 171 375 3780
    Fax  44 171 422 9439
    Mobile   44 378 863 036


I'm pretty sure I'll be in tomorrow but this is what I've seen in the
Dominion package.

Summary:
No information on the large storage contract or where that balance is being
tracked on Dominion's system.  Maybe the large contract expired 11/30/01 and
Dominion only provided info on firm contracts effective after 12/2/01.  EES
had a smaller storage contract from NYSEG with a total capacity of 21,000
that did not expire until 3/31/02.  No information on the storage balance
for this contract either.

Producers
Dominion provide summary statements for production gas allocated to EES and
ENA with the last month being Feb 2002.  Strange thing is that in November,
Dominion terminated all the contracts where the balances are currently being
tracked for both ENA and EES (ENA contracts 8G001N, 8G001S, and 8T001S) (EES
contracts 8G310N, 8G310S, and 8T310S).

Per the Imbalance Statement for EES, the accumulated imbalances for all 3
contracts is (4809) as of Feb 2002.  The imblance was (2110)  as of Nov
2001.  So it appears that Dominion had allocated some gas out of EES's pools
prior to 12/2/2001.

Per the Imbalance Statement for ENA, the accumulated imbalances for all 3
contracts is 21,167 as of Feb 2002.  The imblance was (19747)  as of Nov
2001.

Important note:  if ENA agrees to pay the remaining producers left in the
pool, ENA would probably only be able to sell the current Feb 2002 balance
of 21,167 dth which means we would be paying Dominion back 19,747 of
imbalance gas.

EES has the following capacity release deals

Contract        Term                              MDQ             Comment
524397           11/1/01-3/31/02    4000               Capacity release from
Dominion Field services

524408           1/1/01-3/31/02       513                 Capacity release
from NYSEG, ck beg term - prob should be 11/1/01

52AA08         11/1/01-3/31/02    513                 capacity release from
nyseg, why the strange contract #

531280           11/1/01-3/31/02    453 / 24470 GSS from NYSEG, something in
the document shows a firm delivery MDQ of 453 and a firm receipt of 135.
may need to find out more about that.

200268           6/1/01-5/31/02       12,000           south to north space
purchased directly from the pipeline.  must be max rate

EES signed agency agreement for Owens-Brockway Glass Containers effective
5/7/2001 for 2 FT agreements.  Under the agency agreement, EES agreed to do
the following 4 functions
         1.  agent may release capacity
         2,  agent may do nominations
         3.  agent may do allocations
         4.  agent receives all bills.
The two contracts are FT 200253 with MDQ of 2,000     and    FT 200254 with
MDQ of 2,500

_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com


<<Energy Crisis Timeline.doc>>

Good afternoon:

You have been added to an e-mail distribution list form Assembly Republican
Leader Dave Cox's office.  This timeline is one of many documents produced
by the Assembly Republican Caucus.  Daily documents include daily agendas
and a daily energy briefing document.  I will forward today's copies to you.

If you have any questions as a result of your meeting with Mr. John
Campbell, please do not hesitate to wither contact Mr. Campbell or Mr. Cox,
or this office.  On behalf of Mr.. Cox, please accept his apologies for
having to reschedule the meeting due to session.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Thank you,

Richard

Richard Costigan, III
Chief of Staff
Office of the Assembly Republican Leader
California State Assembly
Phone:(916) 319-2005

 - Energy Crisis Timeline.doc


Would you send me the Gas Daily's for Henry Hub, Transco St 65, Transco St
45, Tetco Wla, Tetco Stx, and Tetco Ela for the last year please.

Thanks


Please match deal 203315 (CES sale for Mar) with deal 209122.
-


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

 - 10-24 1200 Report.xls


The wierdness continues.....

In the Senate:
After Burton's "proclamation" yesterday afternoon that Senate bill 78XX was "all Edison was getting, period," the bill was voted down in committee and never made it to the full Senate for a vote.
The bill will be "reconsidered" (i.e., voted on again) today in the same committee.

In the Assembly:
Hertzberg's bill (82XX) got voted down initially, until Rod Wright switched his vote and let it get out.
82 XX then went to the appropriations committee, where it was voted out, and now it's scheduled for a floor vote this morning.
83XX, the bipartisan bill led by Wright (D) and Richman (R), was also voted out of committee and will go to appropriations today.

Will report back later this AM with any additional information.

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 07/19/2001 09:40 AM -----

	Jeff Dasovich Sent by: Jeff Dasovich 07/18/2001 08:18 PM 	   To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, skean@enron.com, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Harry Kingerski/Enron@EnronXGate, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Susan M Landwehr/Enron@EnronXGate, mpalmer@enron.com, Karen Denne/Enron@EnronXGate, Janel Guerrero/Enron@EnronXGate, Paul Kaufman/Enron@EnronXGate  cc:   Subject: California Update 07.18.01

The Senate, the Assembly and the Governor are either poised to engage in very difficult negotiations, or the three are about to crash and burn and Edison's going to be left dangling.

In the Senate:
The Senate bill 78XX is with about 90% likelihood going to be voted out of the Senate tonight---without a vote having taking place in any committee.
Burton announced during one of the two "informational" hearings that "this is it," despite the view of just about everyone who appeared before the committees the bill likely won't prevent Edison from going bankrupt.
The key features of the bill are:
Banks and QFs get paid in full.
Edison shareholders would be responsible for debts owed to suppliers
No direct access.
There are conflicting reports about whether the Senate will take up the bill tomorrow de-linking the bonds from the DWR contracts and whether the Republicans will go along with it.

In the Assembly:
The Committee is hearing the Wright and Hertzberg bills as we speak, with Hertzberg's the likely winner.
That bill now provides for Direct Access under certain conditions (the amendments describing the conditions were faxed today).
We're attempting to get the "July 12" date changed to "the effective date of the bill" or later.
The Assembly likely won't vote the Hertzberg bill out until tomorrow at the earliest.

The Problem:
The Assembly and Senate bills are diametrically opposed in the way each approaches the problem---in short, the bills are two ships passing in the night.
The Democratic leaders (Governor, Hertzberg, Burton) aren't talking, and Burton hasn't expressed any interest in talking---to anybody.

The likely outcome given the circumstances:
Burton says he's done what he needs to do (i.e., passed out a "fair" bill); the Assembly and Senate can't agree; they finish the budget; time runs out; they leave Friday; and Edison's left twisting.

That said, there's still a chance that the Governor could call Burton and sit down with Burton and Hertzberg and work something out by Friday, or begin talking and postpone the recess until they get it worked out.  But given Burton, the chance of that happening seems very slim.

In short, little has changed since yesterday.

Best,
Jeff


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 10/16/2000 08:53 PM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	10/16/2000 07:54 PM

		 To: skean@enronl.com, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, mpalmer@enron.com, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan
J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Sandra
McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: ENA Successful in ISO Auction

In case word hasn't gotten around, ENA learned COB Friday, that it has been
chosen to engage in further negotiations with the ISO for about 450 MWs of
projects.  The preliminary award is based on ENA's response to the RFQ that
the ISO issued last month for "emergency resources."


no interest.  I know him from the gas markets.

Johnny Palmer@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
12/19/2000 05:32 PM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman@ECT
cc:
Subject: Dave Pruner's resume

Jeff,

Please advice of your interest in Dave's experience.

Thanks,
Johnny
---------------------- Forwarded by Johnny Palmer/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
12/19/2000 05:32 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Ted C Bland @ ECT                           12/19/2000 10:54 AM

To: Charles A Taylor/NA/Enron@Enron, Johnny
Palmer/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Dave Pruner's resume

Charles - Potential candidate for Donahue, Dietrich or EIM.  Johnny - See if
there is anything in EGM that would be a fit.  Ted
---------------------- Forwarded by Ted C Bland/HOU/ECT on 12/19/2000 10:43
AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Amy Gambill @ ENRON                           12/19/2000 10:14 AM

To: Ted C Bland/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Dave Pruner's resume

Ted,
This is the resume of someone I know socially (through Houston Ballet Guild)
who happens to work for Azurix.  He, like so many others over there, really
would like to explore opportunities at Enron.  He has a very strong resume
and is someone I think we should really take a look at.  He realizes he may
have to take a step down to make the transition.  Who would you suggest we
forward him to?

Thanks,
Amy
---------------------- Forwarded by Amy Gambill/Corp/Enron on 12/19/2000
10:06 AM ---------------------------

David Pruner@AZURIX
12/19/2000 08:38 AM
To: Amy Gambill/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Dave Pruner's resume

If you want Amy we could meet at 3:00 in my office or we can keep at the
coffee shop whichever you prefer.
Dave Pruner 713-646-8329


How do you want to deal with this and wireless in general?

GP

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Webb, Jay
Sent:	Wednesday, May 23, 2001 8:49 AM
To:	Piper, Greg; Zipper, Andy
Subject:	RE: EnronOnline in the palm of your hand

Hi Greg,

The ETS guys currently listen to our TIB traffic and use it in some of their internal applications.  This is a practice that I have never liked, primarily because these messages are intended to be internal to the EOL application suite, and we need the flexibility to change them as necessary.  As an example, as part of a recent exercise to reduce the overall network traffic, we re-engineered the entire EOL messaging layer.  However, it took us months to roll that change to production because we had to wait for the many pirates of our data to change to the new message structure.

Our message to these guys has always been that we cannot support these efforts, and that we maintain the freedom to change our messaging at any time.  In practice, however, that is not realistic.  The "EnronOnline in the palm of your hand" e-mail refers to an application service that ETS has built on top of our message traffic that allows IPAQ users to request EOL prices.  This is particularly problematic, because as Andy as said, we must maintain control of the EnronOnline brand.  We don't have any control of the quality of this application.  The idea is a good one, so it is likely that if it is made available, our traders will be using it.  Or worse, our executives.  At that point, we have no choice but to fully support it.  As such, this kind of thing circumvents our prioritization process.

Andy's message to Steve (below) is very gracious.  Frankly, I believe the message should simply be "kill this".

--jay

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Piper, Greg
Sent:	Wednesday, May 23, 2001 8:11 AM
To:	Zipper, Andy
Cc:	Webb, Jay
Subject:	RE: EnronOnline in the palm of your hand

What is this all about?

GP

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Zipper, Andy
Sent:	Tuesday, May 22, 2001 12:46 PM
To:	Hotte, Steve
Cc:	McCarty, Danny; Bibi, Philippe A.; Piper, Greg; Webb, Jay; Forster, David
Subject:	EnronOnline in the palm of your hand

Steve,

I understand that you are rolling this product out for internal users only. In that case I have a couple of thoughts

1). I have no problem with an internal launch of this. If external, I have a very big problem.

2). I think it would be better for the relationship between ETS and ENW had you informed us of your intention to do this. You are using the EnronOnline brand and whether that is internal or external it is ours to manage. as this was a complete surprise to us. It doesn't really seem like just a pipeline risk management product.

3). Because this was not part of our development and operations effort, we cannot support the product technically. There will be no change management. Given the amount of changes we do to our back end there is a high likelihood that in the future your product will cease to function

4). It looks pretty good and I commend your ingenuity.

If you disagree with any of this please feel free to let me know.

Andy Zipper


Steve & Rick,

Below are the summaries that I have prepared for the Asian countries (Jane
Wilson have already sent you a summary on  India).  Hope they are useful and
I welcome any comments or questions.

Best regards,

Xi Xi


I'm at home this am, as I want to go by GE's offices this am to get some
signatures.

Kay


I am not a big Soussan fan. Zimmerman would be best.

	Bonnie White@ENRON
	10/09/2000 10:49 AM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Vinmar

I went to the Courthouse today for the Vinmar hearing on the motion to compel
and for sanctions related to the traders tapes.  Before the start of the
hearing, we met outside the courtroom with Vinmar's lawyers.  They apparently
finally came to the conclusion that the arbitration agreement covers this
discovery dispute, and, after some discussion, they agreed to pass the
hearing.  We will work with them to select a mutually agreeable arbitrator
this week, if possible, and they can have this issue heard before the
arbitrator.  This morning they mentioned three former judges as potential
arbitrators: Ruby Sondock, Alvin Zimmerman, and Susan Soussan, although I
think their preference out of those three would be Alvin Zimmerman.  He would
also be my preference out of those choices.  They may send us other names
that they would consider using as an arbitrator, but, in the meantime, let me
know what you think about these three.  Thanks.


Decisions, decisions ...they are tough for her.  I suppose that if she wants
others to host the shower that we can just split the cost of a couple of
packs of diaper pins and then focus on eating all the sandwiches and cake
that we can!  (Do you think that we will be invited?)  That really sounds
ugly, and I don't mean it to.  I think that your idea was a great one, but if
she has too many offers we can probably just as easily be guests.  Let me
know when the deliberation process is completed!  --Sally

"Cindy White" <cwhite@viviance.com> on 09/27/2000 03:12:05 PM
To: <Sally.Beck@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: shower

Sally,

Let's reserve that last weekend.  Saturday would be fine with me.  You need
to know that I got an email from Cara--she's had a couple of offers for
showers--and is having a hard time deciding what to do (hmm...what a
surprise!).  Anyway, am not sure where our offer stands--we'll see.  I told
her to do whatever is best for her (while thinking:  if she doesn't choose
our shower invitation it will affect my gift!)

Will try to pin her down...

Cindy

-----Original Message-----
From: Sally.Beck@enron.com [mailto:Sally.Beck@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 6:13 PM
To: cwhite@viviance.com
Subject: Re: shower

Late Jan sounds great.  Meagan does have a couple of big things on the
weekend in January -- National Charity League Senior Presentation (big
dance that she and I are committed to help with), the Bearkadette Ball and
a winter party for Cotillion.  I believe that these are three weekends in a
row, January 6, 13 and 20th.  So the last weekend in January would work
well (and I will need a rest from formal affairs!).  Does that work for
you?  And do you want to do it on a Saturday or Sunday?  Saturday probably
works better for me, just so that I am back in Houston and doing laundry by
Sunday afternoon!!

"Cindy White" <cwhite@viviance.com> on 09/26/2000 09:46:52 AM

To:   "Sally" <sally.beck@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  shower

Hi...

Talked to the little mother-to-be.  She said a shower would be grand.  She
has some big presentation mid-January.  How does late January sound to you.
Should we set a date now?  Am I turning into Mother?

Cindy


I believe this letter is applicable to the Blue Dog turbines:


Talked to Edison about getting a meeting with Craver.  They're going to get back to me.

Best,
Jeff


The trade confirmation for your order(s) is now available online at
etrade.com(sm).
Use the URL(s) below to view (customer log on required).

The information contained in this confirmation shall be binding upon you if
you do not object,
either in writing or via electronic mail, within two (2) days after the
confirmation is first received by you.

Document ID: 20010420023633138980133957
https://trading.etrade.com/cgi-bin/gx.cgi/applogic+accttaxbridge?page=CONFIRM&
cmd=display&doctype=cnf&document_id=20010420023633138980133957
Document ID: 20010420023633138980133959
https://trading.etrade.com/cgi-bin/gx.cgi/applogic+accttaxbridge?page=CONFIRM&
cmd=display&doctype=cnf&document_id=20010420023633138980133959
Document ID: 20010420023633138980133958
https://trading.etrade.com/cgi-bin/gx.cgi/applogic+accttaxbridge?page=CONFIRM&
cmd=display&doctype=cnf&document_id=20010420023633138980133958


Gracias amigo!

DB

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Will, Lloyd
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 2:23 PM
To:	Baughman Jr., Don
Subject:	FW:

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Serio, Erik
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 2:03 PM
To:	Will, Lloyd
Subject:

 << File: MDEA Night Duties.doc >>  << File: SOP 13 MDEA Forecast.doc >>


Please see below information on the West Virginia Settlement from Janine
Migden.

---------------------- Forwarded by Ginger Dernehl/HOU/EES on 12/13/99 05:08
PM ---------------------------

Janine Migden
12/13/99 03:57 PM
To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES,
Elizabeth Linnell/HOU/EES@EES, Ginger Dernehl/HOU/EES@EES, Lynnette
Barnes/HOU/EES@EES, Susan.R.Lewis@enron.com
cc: Thomas S Reichelderfer/DUB/EES@EES, Barbara A Hueter/DUB/EES@EES, Lara
Leibman/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: West Virginia Settlement

Thom and I have just completed negotiations in West Virginia involving APS,
AEP and other stakeholders.
The settlement, being filed today is a compromise on all the issues and is
the result of negotiations.  Enron was the only marketer involved in the
process.  While we weighed in all the issues, there are a number of items
that but for our persistence would not have been included in the final
agreement.  These items include the following:

1.  Native load language
2.  Competitive metering and billing for industrial and large commercials as
of day one, with other customers following no later than within the next four
years.
3.  Addition of competitive bidding for default service at end of 5 years.
4.  Change from functional separation to a requirement to corporately
separate as soon as possible but no later than within the next five years.
5.  Strong codes of conduct that form the base for more detailed rulemaking.
(A special thanks to Lara Leibman for her assistance).

Below is a summary of the entire settlement:

1.  All customers can exercise choice beginning January 1, 2001.
2.  All utilities including IOU's, munies and coops can opt in.  APS has
committed to opt in whereas AEP is not because it did not get any stranded
cost and it also did not get a guarantee of full recovery of all costs
resulting from the environmental lawsuits against them irrespective of their
financial condition.
3.  Competitive metering and billing as described above.
4.  Generation is deregulated.
5.  PSC continues jurisdiction over implemention, rate unbundling,
reliability, codes of conduct, supplier licensing, construction of
transmission lines and eminent domain authority.
6.  Native load language - Requires utilities to provide service to
affiliated and unaffiliated suppliers only under the applicable distribution
tariffs and proformatransmission tariffs.
7.  RTO's - Each utility must join a FERC approved RTO or its equivlent by no
later than 1/1/03;  best efforts requirement to eliminate pancaking by 1/1/05
if IOU's are in separate RTO's.
8.  Competitive bidding process for  default service customers at end of year
5 for remainder of transition period.
9.  Rate unbundling requirement
10. Rates capped for first 4 years with any FERC change in transmission being
applied as an offset to distribution.
Rates continue to be regulated through the 10th year with the rate gradually
increasing during the second six years for the residential and small
commercial customers.  For the large commercial and industrial customers, the
rate regulation ends 12/31/07.
11.  A rate stabilization deferral fund is created to facilitate the
transition to competition in years 11, 12 and 13, under which APS must
contribute $56.75 million and AEP must contribute $81 million to be used as
an offset to the prices paid by small residential and commercial default
customers.
12.  Large commercial and industrial customers receive for the first 4 years,
rate decreases in an amount to be determined by the Commission for AEP
customers and 3% for APS customers.  The rate decrease is allocated to
distribution.
13.  No stranded costs (either generating or regulatory assets) for AEP or
APS, however APS gets a ten year PURPA surcharge starting at 2.6 mills per
kwh in year one and declining to .75 mills per kwh in the last two years.
14.  Usual licensing requirements.  (AEP fought for the right to have a
second tier of licensing where they would have the ability to certify
marketers but we defeated that).
15. Corporate separation and codes of conduct as described above.
16. Consumer protection and education requirements typically found in other
plans.
17. Low income protection provisions providing a .2 mil surcharge with the
minimum being $.40 and the maximum being $300.
18. Utility worker protection plan.

Below for your information is the plan.

At this point the plan goes to the PSC for approval and then on to the
legislature for a resoulution approving the PSC order.  We expect that AEP
and labor will oppose it, so it will be a close call.

Janine


Gentlemen:

I'm excited about moving forward with this new organization.

I have attached a file with minor suggested modifications, and have started
to drop in names.  (Run on legal size paper)

My only major concern to the organization of the Planning function.
Specifically, with respect to an operating, capital and cash flow plan, the
org. chart appears to have the bulk of the new functional organization
supported but a number key income, capital and cash components missing.

I would like to discuss/clarify Planning with the two of you, and recommend
that we then identify the next level of leadership
AND the # of "boxes" they have to work with; and then bring the bigger team
into a room and "divey" up the remaining resources -sort of an NFL draft
model.


Privileged and Confidential

As requested, attached are copies of selected correspondence prepared by
Enron Canada to either the Alberta Government or the Power Pool of Alberta
addressing various Alberta electricity restructuring issues that may directly
or indirectly relate to Project Stanley.   Also attached are the speaking
notes that I relied on during two panel discussions that I participated in at
conferences on Alberta electricity restructuring earlier this year.   These
speaking notes reflect the messages that Enron Canada has communicated in
many different forums in Alberta on the PPAs and other electricity
restructuring issues.

I have organized the documents into groups as some of the documents may not
be relevant to the work being undertaken by both GPC and Blake Cassels and
therefore may only be of interest to just one of them.

1) Speaking Notes Reflecting Comments Made by Rob Hemstock on Alberta
Electricity Restructuring in March and April 2000

2) Concerns Regarding Design of Power Purchase Arrangements

3) Concerns Regarding Changes to Power Pool of Alberta Restatement Rules

4) Concerns Regarding Formal Implementation of Power Pool Price Cap

5) Concerns Regarding Power Pool of Alberta Disclosure of Identity of Bidders
into Power Pool and Their Prices

Regards,

Rob


For the last two nights, the hourly desk night crew was unable to view/print the scheduling activity report (SAR) for the northeast hourly book.  This report provides detail as to whether or not the book is flat net megawatts for the day.  We were able to view and print the SAR report for the remaining hourly books (ERCOT, southeast, midwest).

Why is this problem persisting?  Please investigate this to rectify this situation.  Thanks.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/24/2000
05:10 PM ---------------------------

Zimin Lu
02/08/2000 04:17 PM
To: Barbara G Dillard/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: valuation of storage contracts

Barbara,

I set up our meeting at 9:00am on March 3 to discuss storage contracts
valuation.
Vince, Stinson and myself will be available to participate the discussion.

Zimin


"Robb, Kathy" <KRobb@hunton.com> writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:

> Enclosed for discussion are draft modifications to the ICAP Manual to
> conform the ICAP Manual sections regarding Control Area System Resources
> with those sections of the ICAP Manual governing the qualification of
> Generators.  Earlier this summer, the ICAPWG informally requested the
> NYISO Staff and a few members of the ICAPWG to prepare and propose such
> modifications.  John Charlton will present these documents for discussion
> at the ICAPWG meeting under item 2 of the Agenda, "Discussion of ICAP
> Developments."
>
>
>  <<CLEAN PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO ICAP MANUAL FOR 09-24.pdf>>
> <<BLACKLINED PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO ICAP MANUAL FOR 09-24.pdf>>
>
>
>

 - CLEAN PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO ICAP MANUAL FOR
 - BLACKLINED PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO ICAP MANUAL FOR


Just wanted to let you all know that the following media outlets were at the press conference this morning:
Channel 2
Channel 45
Channel 48
KUHF radio (NPR)

The Houston Business Journal picked up the story and is currently running it on its home page (it will appear in print this Friday).

Channel 26 plans on coming out to the awards celebration tomorrow night. The Chronicle and several other local papers are also working on stories.

Laura


Here is the VOM and FOM for a 4 GE 7EA plant in Vicksburg, MS.
VOM = $0.88
Annual FOM = $915,000
These numbers are a good estimate based off of our Caledonia plant, which is
currently operating in the TVA region.  Please give me a call if you have any
questions.  Thanks!
Ben
3-7998


Jay, do we have copy's of all the executed documents... and if so, where are you going to put them.
Also, did we change the counterparty names in the system and put in offsetting transactions with SOCAL etc.... and new positions with PG&E.  These need to go into the system. MAKE SURE YOU CHECK THIS.

BT


Spoke with Ben Glisan re our conversation on retail credit and concluded that
we should meet with some banks that specialize in this area. Can you prepare
a brief presentation that would serve as a discussion document for such a
meeting. The concept is that a deal flows into a website?? that is basically
a checklist and the transaction is sized and scoped. If it met deal criteria
and portfolio requirements, it would flow directly to an outside shop that
would fund, bill, track etc. Enron could possibly keep a small interest in
economics and of course a skim.

Lets review presentation, then discuss with Ben/Andy and Janet D.  and
proceed to banks. Ben is clearing idea with Delaney. We are shooting for a
Friday (23) meeting.

Thanks, Rick


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/04/2001 03:39
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Ben F Jacoby @ ECT                           01/04/2001 03:38 PM

Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: michael.o.sandridge@us.abb.com @ ENRON
cc: ben.jacoby@enron.com@ENRON, Kay.mann@enron.com@ENRON,
david.onuscheck@us.abb.com@ENRON, karla.hesketh@us.abb.com@ENRON, Fred
Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Contract comments

Mike:

Based on our telephone conversation, the only comment we will include in the
contract is 1 below, i.e. we are not going to change any commercial terms of
the deal. Thanks for your help and patience in this process.

Ben

michael.o.sandridge@us.abb.com on 01/04/2001 01:42:58 PM
To: ben.jacoby@enron.com, Kay.mann@enron.com
cc: david.onuscheck@us.abb.com, karla.hesketh@us.abb.com
Subject: Contract comments

Ben/Kay,
After reviewing the contract with Dave we found only a couple of points that
we
would like to mention;
1) 1.48 the Maximum Liability Amount should be $768,000 USD
2) The unit will not be delivered until the last 10% (ten percent) retention
is
paid and we will post the surety bond as shown in in Exhibit D
3) ABB would not buy back the unit except from Enron.

Please let me know if there is any way that we may further assist you.

MIKE


Steve, I don't think you need to be at our meeting.  We have room 3125B at
1:30 PM tomorrow.

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 05/08/2000 01:03
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kimberly Brown                           05/08/2000 12:48 PM

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: CES Sales

EB3125B


Rod - Please review the attached documents and advise Sara if acceptable
from a credit standpoint.

 Souad -  Once Sara and Rod say docs are Ok, you can dup them out for the 11
subs.  Show Sara all docs before you send them to CP.

 Sara - there is a Guarantor for Vidriera Mexico, S.A. de C.V.   The
Guarantor is --Vitro Envases Norte America, S.A. de C.V.   Rod wants it to be
an unlimited Guaranty on our form of CP GTY.   I am sending the form of GTY
to Eduardo Melo by fax tonight at fax number 011-528-378-4793.  You will need
to prepare a  form of sub deemed ISDA for this sub to include the GTY.

Susan D. Flynn
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB3806
Houston, Texas  77002
Phone:  713-853-0975
Fax:  713-646-3490


Start Date: 10/20/01; HourAhead hour: 17;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.


The place to find the tarriff is at

http://www.mtpower.com/rates/Gas/offsystemgtc.pdf


Please amend the existing Master Agreement per terms of this credit worksheet.

thanks
brant


Hey darlin'.  How are you?  Bet NYC is mighty nice this time of year.  Hope
to get there real soon.

Best to you and your better half,
Jeff


Yep, one thing I'm good at is being wrong (just ask Molly).

-----Original Message-----
From: Parks, Joe [mailto:Joe.Parks@bridgeline.net]
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 2:49 PM
To: Fenner, Chet
Subject: RE: Go Baby!

does that mean i need to cover

-----Original Message-----
From: Fenner, Chet [mailto:Chet_Fenner@bmc.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 2:45 PM
To: Parks, Joe
Subject: Go Baby!

Finally putting my money where my mouth is - I'm in.

************************************************************************

This e-mail is the property of Bridgeline Holdings, L.P. and/or its relevant affiliate(s) and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Bridgeline Holdings, L.P. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.

************************************************************************


FYI - SRS
---------------------- Forwarded by Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron on 03/28/2001
08:53 AM ---------------------------

Lana Steffen
03/28/2001 08:09 AM
To: Kenneth Lay/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: California Energy Crisis

Mr. Lay and Mr. Skilling:

I shared the below article with my brother, due to his interest in the
California energy crisis.  Since he is an "outside" source, I thought you
might like to see his comments regarding your article.  They follow below:

 I read the entire article you sent on the California power crisis by Enron.
I think
 they should publish this very article in all of the California papers.
That's the simplest and best,
 get to the point, no bull article I've seen on the  matter. I would agree
100% with their assesment
 of the mess. Californian's have no one to blame but their State government's
stupidity, although they're
 trying to find someone.

Thanks for an understandable article!

Lana Steffen
Administrative Analyst
Liberal, KS

Ken Lay and Jeff Skilling
03/13/2001 04:17 PM

Sent by: Ken Lay and Jeff Skilling
To: All Enron Worldwide
cc:

Subject: California Energy Crisis

California,s power crisis has generated heated debate over the last several
months.  Unfortunately, this debate has generated more heat than light.  We
want you to know what the facts are and what we are doing about the crisis.
Please spend a few minutes reading the following overview on the situation
and our position on California energy issues.

What happened in California

The source of California,s current problem is as straightforward as supply
and demand.  California,s economy grew 29 percent since 1998.  This increased
the demand for electricity by 24 percent.  At the same time, regulatory
restrictions prevented new generation from getting built in the state.  So
demand grew but regulations prevented supplies from being added.  The result,
predictably, is a shortage.  This summer, peak capacity will be about 10
percent shy of peak demand, leading to further blackouts in the state.

In addition to the supply and demand imbalance, there are two other related
factors that led to the current crisis.  First, the state,s regulations
forced all sales and purchases into the spot market.  The spot market for
power is extraordinarily volatile.  The way firms behave in a free market
when faced with such volatility is to construct a portfolio of purchases long
term, medium term and short term, to reduce exposure to this volatility.  In
California, state regulation prevented this strategy.  This would be the
equivalent of putting the entire state on an adjustable rate mortgage in the
most volatile interest rate environment imaginable.  Everything was fine
while the power surplus persisted, but when shortages ensued, every megawatt
was purchased at the sky rocketing spot price.

Second, retail markets were not deregulated.  Regulated retail rates remained
in effect, and stranded cost recovery charges were structured to keep
competition out.  This meant that utilities were forced to pay high wholesale
prices in the spot market but were only able to recover costs at the
regulated retail rate.  They are now nearly bankrupt.

In short, California,s problems were caused by regulation, not deregulation.
Regulations prevented competitors from entering the market, prevented new
generation from being built, and prevented prudent hedging against volatile
spot prices.

At the time California was developing its restructuring plan, Enron warned
the state,s policy makers about these risks and proposed alternatives, which,
if adopted, would have averted the current crisis.

Enron,s Role

Many political leaders in the state have elected to fix blame rather than fix
the problem.  Power sellers, including Enron, have been vilified by the
politicians and the media.  Here are the facts:

? Other than a small amount of wind power, Enron is not a generator in the
state of California.  Every megawatt we sold in California we bought in the
same market available to other California purchasers.  Because we are a
market maker, not a generator, we are not biased toward high prices.  We are
interested only in having a market that works so that we can package products
for our customers.
? As a seller to end-use markets in the state, we provided protection from
the problems the states, utilities, and their customers, now face.  We
protected, and still protect, our customers from price volatility.

You may have read that EES recently elected to have the utilities supply
power directly to its customers in California instead of procuring power on
the open market.  Early reports mischaracterized this as a &turnback8 of our
customers to the utilities.  Here are the facts:

? As a result of a variety of factors existing in the current California
market, it made more sense for EES to source power for its customers directly
from the utilities.  This decision reduced EES,s market price risk by
allowing EES to access lower utility rates.
? EES did not terminate any customer contracts, and our customers continue to
receive the financial benefits of their contract prices.
? EES is continuing to work with its California customers to provide them
with other energy-related products and services, including assistance in
reducing the demand for power, particularly at peak times.

Enron is currently proposing solutions to help California work out of its
crisis; Enron continues to sign up customers in the state; and Enron
continues to actively manage its risks and capture opportunities in Western
power markets.  Enron,s primary business is managing risk for our customers
with solutions customized to meet their needs.  There has never been more
demand for our products and services.

The Solution

The solution to California,s crisis is also straightforward.  In summary, the
state must increase supply, reduce demand, reduce reliance on the spot market
and shore up the financial stability of the state,s utilities.

Increasing Supply

California,s process for siting and permitting new generation is nothing
short of Byzantine.  Enron has built plants elsewhere in the country in less
than a year.  In California, it often takes 5 to 7 years.  California simply
must streamline this process.  Ironically, while many of the regulations
generators must overcome are aimed at improving environmental quality, the
regulations are preventing new clean technology from coming online and
displacing current plants, which emit 40 times as much NOx.  California can
have abundant power and cleaner air by expediting the permitting of new
facilities.

Reducing Demand

Customers in California today have no incentive to reduce or shift demand.
They pay the same rate no matter what the market price is.  An open retail
market would trigger demand responses, which would balance supply and demand
at lower prices than today.  California should fully open its retail market.

Reducing Reliance on the Spot Market

In a truly deregulated market, customers would protect themselves from
volatile spot prices by purchasing some of their requirements on a longer
term, fixed-price basis.  The state has instead left procurement in the hands
of the utilities, which it has forced to buy exclusively in the spot market.
Opening the market at the retail level will give customers control over their
price risk.

Restoring the Financial Integrity of the State,s Institutions

The utilities in California are not paying their bills.  This has led to
greater uncertainty in the market, higher costs, and reduced flexibility to
arrive at lasting solutions.  California must permit its utilities to recover
their costs so they can pay their bills and invest in the transmission and
distribution assets necessary to get power from where it is to where it is
needed.

Just as important as doing these things, the state must avoid policies that,
while politically attractive, do not fix the problem or even make matters
worse.  Price caps have been proposed.  They don,t work; have never worked;
and they will not work here.  Price caps succeed only in creating shortages,
which then have to be allocated among competing users.  Imagine how
ineffectively the government would be in determining, for example, whether it
is better to make its limited power supplies available to the Imperial Valley
or Silicon Valley.  Price caps are a surefire way to make the current
shortage worse.

The state has also proposed to take over generation and transmission in
California.  There is no reason to believe, and every reason to doubt, that
the state will be more effective than free markets at investing in,
constructing, operating and maintaining assets.  This will also result in
California tax revenues being spent on power transmission and power
generation -- which the private sector can do -- instead of education, roads
and other public goods -- which the private sector cannot do.

As you are approached by people outside the company or are learning about the
crisis from the media, it,s important for you to know this:  We at Enron will
continue to serve our customers and we will continue to propose real
solutions to the state.


FYI

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/26/2000
09:14 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Lynn Pikofsky @ ENRON                           04/25/2000 01:56 PM

To: Laura Luce/Corp/Enron@Enron, Barbara G Dillard/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kevin P
Radous/Corp/Enron@Enron, Cary M Carrabine/Corp/Enron@Enron, Tim
Hermann/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gregg Penman/Corp/Enron@Enron, Paul
Burgener/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Roy Rodriguez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Russell E
Murrell/Corp/Enron@Enron, Steve Richman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard
Tomaski/Corp/Enron@Enron, Dave Wear/Corp/Enron@ENRON, m.divalerio@pecorp.com,
j.burns@pecorp.com, Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rusty
Stevens/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Deirdre McCaffrey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Real Options Seminar

The Real Options Seminar which is scheduled on Thursday April 27th will be
held in EB46C1.  The seminar will begin at 8:30 and will finish at 11:30.
Coffee and bagels will be served.

The baseball will begin at 3:05, and the ball park opens at 1:00.  Food and
drinks will be provided in the suite at 2:00.  There may be a tour of the
field scheduled at 1:00, I will let you know the details.

Dinner is to follow the game, place is still be determined.

For Chicago attendees, if you are on the 4:44 flight, please let me know if
you need transportation to the airport.  Transportation will be provided in
Houston upon arrival to the hotel.  Please let me know of your flight
itinerary if you are interested.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Lynn
312) 541-1379


Vince.  Thanks for getting back to me.   I will have my secretary try to
set up something among the three of us.  Gary, as Vince cannot make a call
on Wednesday, I will have my assistant call you to try to find a suitable
time.  Rachel, Gary Jackson's phone number is 423 751 2593 and Vince
Kaminski's secretary's number is given below.

At 03:34 PM 2/21/00 -0600, you wrote:
>
>
>Peter,
>
>I am in London till Wednesday afternoon. I shall be back at the office on
>Thursday.
>
>Please, feel free to call my  secretary, Shirley Crenshaw 713 853 5290,  to
>schedule
>a conference call. I cannot access my calendar from London and don't know my
>commitments for this day.
>
>Vince
>
>
>
>
>
>Peter Tufano <ptufano@hbs.edu> on 02/18/2000 03:56:33 PM
>
>To:   Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, gljackson2@tva.gov
>cc:
>Subject:  RE: March Real Options Conference
>
>
>
>Dear Vince and Gary,
>
>We are all speaking at the March Real Options Session in NY.   My work in
>real options in the energy field has come, to a large part, from my
>casewriting in your two organizations, so I feel that we should probably
>allocate more time toward your presentations and less to mine.   While we
>have a two hour block among the three of us, I think we can freely
>re-arrange things to produce the best result.  Would you two like to
>schedule a brief conference call to coordinate our talks?    I am free
>virtually all of next Wednesday 2/23, perhaps we could talk at 10 am (EST)
>or 2 pm (EST)?   I am happy to arrange the call, if you send me your phone
>numbers.  Thanks.
>
>Peter Tufano
>
>
>---------------------------
>Prof. Peter Tufano
>Harvard Business School
>Morgan Hall 377
>Soldiers Field
>Boston, Massachusetts 02163
>phone: (617) 495-6855
>fax:   (617) 496-6592
>email: ptufano@hbs.edu
>http://www.people.hbs.edu/ptufano
>
Professor Peter Tufano
Harvard Business School
Morgan 377
Soldiers Field
Boston, MA 02163

Phone      (617) 495-6855
Fax          (617) 496-6592
Email        ptufano@hbs.edu

http://www.people.hbs.edu/ptufano


Attached is a draft of the LOI we discussed.  Please review and let me know
if you have any questions.


Lysa is sending flowers on our (sue, you me and Alan) behalf after we hear
how the surgery went.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 2:10 PM
To: Shapiro, Richard; Kaufman, Paul; Steffes, James D.; Kingerski, Harry;
Mara, Susan; Alamo, Joseph; skean@enron.com; Denne, Karen
Subject: Bev's out Wed-Mon with Surgery

FYI.  Bev just phoned.  Assuming all goes well---and it should----she'll back
on her feet and working next Tuesday.

Best,
Jeff


here ya go.
---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Groves/HOU/ECT on 11/30/2000 05:41
PM ---------------------------

Les Webber @ ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

11/25/2000 06:16 PM
To: Eric Groves@ECT
cc: Doug Arnell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: LNG TRANSACTION AROUND THE ELBA ISLAND LNG TERMINAL

ERIC:

We had a brief discussion regarding the LNG sales arrangement Enron has
entered with El Paso Merchant Energy (successor to Sonat Energy Services)
centered on the firm service capacity that Merchant holds at the Elba Island
LNG Terminal, which will be reactivated to accept LNG tanker deliveries
sometime late next year or early in 2002.

Enron signed a binding Letter Agreement (which included a fairly
comprehensive Term Sheet) with Merchant on October 13, 1999.  A copy of this
agreement is attached hereto.

It was anticipated that the parties would execute a "Definitive Agreement",
which would replace the Letter Agreement and contain a number of other terms
and conditions to be mutually agreed upon.  As a precaution, the Letter
Agreement did outline a process to bring closure to this matter in case the
parties could not agree.

The parties did work together for several months on negotiating an "LNG Sale
and Purchase Agreement", which added a considerable number of important
provisions and modified a number of terms and conditions contained in the
Letter Agreement for the benefit of both parties.  However, the Quality
Letter Agreement, which is an attachment to the Letter Agreement, has become
a major source of contention for two primary reasons:
despite the fact that the parties did not intend to modify the Quality Letter
Agreement, it is apparent to Enron, and indeed to Merchant, that this
agreement does not position the Terminal with the capability of handling LNG
from any meaningful number of LNG production sources in the world.
Southern LNG, which is a party to the Quality Letter Agreement, has no
intention of agreeing to meaningfully modify its Terminal, although something
could be worked out if Enron were to eliminate a considerable portion of its
flexibility and optionality in its sales arrangement with Merchant, an
affiliate of Southern LNG.

I am attaching a copy of the LNG Sale and Purchase Agreement, as it was last
drafted in early July this year.  This draft does represent some considerable
movement from the Letter Agreement, but we found it to be acceptable with the
assumption that the quality issue would be favorably resolved.  This copy is
in the comparewrite format, but I think you will be able to work your way
through it for your purposes.

When it recently became apparent that w would not be able to close with
Merchant in terms acceptable to use, we decided we had better move back to
the Term Sheet intent, even though both parties will realize some
unattractive returns.  We have now drafted up the "Definitive LNG Sale and
Purchase Agreement', which we believe captures the full intent of the Letter
Agreement and Term Sheet.  It is attached below for your review.

Following your review of the pertinent aspects of these last two documents,
we would appreciate the opportunity to meet with you to discuss how, from a
pricing point of view, they might be better restructured.

Regards.
Les


Vince, many thanks!  I will let our accounting department know.  Kim.


Marshall,

A number of my associates. The names are to be determined.

Vince

Marshall Brown <Marshall.Brown@robertwalters.com> on 03/12/2001 12:48:21 PM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc:
Subject: RE: Resume

Vince,
     Who else besides you will be speaking with him?

Marshall Brown
Vice President
Robert Walters Associates
Tel: (212) 704-0596
Fax:(212) 704 - 4312
mailto:marshall.brown@robertwalters.com
http://www.robertwalters.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com [SMTP:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 1:35 PM
> To: Marshall.Brown@robertwalters.com
> Cc: Zimin.Lu@enron.com; Paulo.Issler@enron.com;
> Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
> Subject: RE: Resume
>
>
> Marshall,
>
> We shall call him on Wednesday after 2:30.
>
> Vince
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Marshall Brown <Marshall.Brown@robertwalters.com> on 03/12/2001 11:23:31
> AM
>
> To:   Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
> cc:
> Subject:  RE: Resume
>
>
> Vince,
>      He can talk today after 2:30pm today or Wednesday afternoon as well.
> His work # is 713-544-5989.  Let me know.
> Regards,
>
> Marshall Brown
> Vice President
> Robert Walters Associates
> Tel: (212) 704-0596
> Fax:(212) 704 - 4312
> mailto:marshall.brown@robertwalters.com
> http://www.robertwalters.com
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:   Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com [SMTP:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
> > Sent:   Monday, March 12, 2001 11:40 AM
> > To:     Marshall.Brown@robertwalters.com
> > Subject:     Re: Resume
> >
> >
> > Marshall,
> >
> > Looks interesting. Can we arrange an exploratory phone interview?
> >
> >
> > Vince
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Marshall Brown <Marshall.Brown@robertwalters.com> on 03/09/2001 07:46:22
> > AM
> >
> > To:   Vince Kaminski <vkamins@ect.enron.com>
> > cc:
> > Subject:  Resume
> >
> >
> > Vince,
> >      How are you.   This candidate would be interested in any positions
> in
> > your group.
> > Regards,
> >
> > Marshall Brown
> > Vice President
> > Robert Walters Associates
> > Tel: (212) 704-0596
> > Fax:(212) 704 - 4312
> > mailto:marshall.brown@robertwalters.com
> > http://www.robertwalters.com
> >
> >  <<ZHAN_REN.DOC>>
> >
> >
> >
> > **********************************************************************
> > CAUTION: Electronic mail sent through the Internet is not secure and
> could
> > be intercepted by a third party.
> >
> > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
> > are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
> > the system manager.
> >
> > This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
> > MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
> >
> > **********************************************************************
> >
> > (See attached file: ZHAN_REN.DOC)
> >
> >  << File: ZHAN_REN.DOC >>
>
>
>


Please plan to attend a discussion concerning the Enron Corp exposure to ETS, Tuesday, November 27, 8:30 a.m. to 9:30 a.m. The areas for discussion will be Pipeline - FERC issues of non-discrimination; Loan Agreement/Covenants; and Partnership Fiduciary responsibilities. The meeting for the Houston attendees will be in Rod's office EB 4054 and for the Omaha attendees, Jerry's office. We will make the call to Jerry's office.

If you have any questions. please advise.

Regards.


Ken, you have fucked so many people that were your "loyal" employees. I would be embarassed to live in Houston and I hope you can sleep at night. Now I know why you have to have 2 body guards with you all of the time. Don't you think that that is an indication of what you have done? Burn in hell bastard!


FYI:

I have arranged the following interview schedule and marked your calendars.
(except Paulo - I do not have access to his calendar).  I have reserved EB
1938.  A copy of his resume will be forthcoming.

Thanks!

Shirley

---------------------- Forwarded by Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT on 09/20/2000
03:42 PM ---------------------------

Shirley Crenshaw
09/20/2000 03:37 PM
To: "Nelson Neale" <neneale@hotmail.com> @ ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Informal Interview with the Enron Research Group

Mr. Neale:

Thank you for responding so quickly.  I have scheduled the following date and
times.  Please let me know if they are convenient for you.

Friday, September 29th:

Vince Kaminski  8:30 AM
Grant Masson  9:00 AM
Vasant Shanbhogue 9:30 AM
Zimin Lu  10:00 AM
Paulo Issler  10:30 AM

Stinson Gibner will be out of the office for 3 weeks beginning Monday, the
25th so he will be unable to interview you.

We should be through between 11:00 - 11:30 AM.  If you have any questions
please feel free to call me.

When you come into the Enron bldg. go to the Security Console and ask
for me.  We are located on the 19th floor and I will meet you at the elevator
lobby on the 19th floor.

Look forward to hearing from you soon.

Regards,

Shirley Crenshaw
713-853-5290

"Nelson Neale" <neneale@hotmail.com> on 09/20/2000 03:18:45 PM
To: Shirley.Crenshaw@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: Informal Interview with the Enron Research Group

Ms. Crenshaw:

Nice to hear from you!  I will be available on the following dates:

Friday September 29 (AM or PM)
Monday October 2 (AM)
Thursday October 12 (AM or PM)
Friday October 13 (AM or PM)

Let me know which of the above dates and times works best for the group.  I
look forward to hearing from you.

Regards,
Nelson Neale

______________________

C. Nelson Neale, Ph.D.
2990 Bissonnet, #9106
Houston, TX  77005
PH: 713-303-5973
neneale@hotmail.com
______________________

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.


Start Date: 1/20/02; HourAhead hour: 14;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002012014.txt
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
? SoCal Conference Call Highlights

SoCal Conference Call- The following comments are notes from the SoCal
conference call for defaulted debt holders, held 1:30 p.m. PDT, 13 July 2001:

? Ted Kravner, the SoCal spokesperson, indicated that there are "a lot of
bills floating around.  There's not a lot for us to say at this point."
After such a long delay, he stated that, "We are encouraged to see real
action at the legislative level."  Also, the company could not comment as to
whether the plans made the utility creditworthy; "We are evaluating that with
Senate and Assembly leaders."

? The spokesperson stated that on Monday the company will make a regular
interest payments on the 5 7/8 notes totaling less than $6 M.  The company
will also make payments on its other notes; the total amount to be paid will
be $27 to $28 M.

? Yesterday the CPUC granted the company's motion on the QF fixed rate
agreement with the gas cogen and renewable QFs.  The spokesperson stated that
the PUC said SoCal can recover all costs associated with its payments to
these QFs.

 Appalucia Management Questions to SoCal
 Q:   Will SCE defer payment on the "quids" notes, which are backed by a
trust that has bonds issued against it?
 A:  Under the terms of the notes SoCal is allowed to defer payment for up to
20 quarters.

 Q: Would the CPUC, after providing for the DWR to be reimbursed for
purchasing power (through the California Procurement Adjustment, or CPA),
leave enough revenue for SoCal to remain solvent?  This was based on reports
in the press recently that the DWR had requested a 25% rate increase.
 A: These reports were "speculation" and were based on numbers that DWR had
submitted several weeks ago.  SoCal stated that DWR must update these
numbers; therefore, no formal CPUC decision on reimbursing SoCal vis-.-vis
DWR can be made at this time.  SoCal indicated that these numbers would be
updated "in a few weeks."

 Prudential Questions to SoCal
 Q:  What bills are currently in process dealing with the MOU?
 A: There is the Polanco bill, which is the original MOU; the  Assembly
(Hertzberg) bill AB 82XX, which uses the Polanco bill as its foundation; and
a Senate bill crafted around Byron Sher's proposals.  SoCal stated that the
Sher bill was "less a matter of using Polanco" and approaches the MOU "from a
different direction."  SoCal indicated that "people are currently studying
the Hertzberg will to see what the components are."

 Q: What is your (SoCal's) reaction to the negative article in the LA Times
today regarding the legislature's perception of the MOU?
 A: SoCal responded that "the LA Times sees the glass as half-empty.  By my
comments, I see the glass as half-full.  We are optimistic because there
something tangible that people are working on.  The fact that Hertzberg's
bill uses the governor's MOU as a foundation provides us with a level of
optimism."  However, he emphasized that the company was not in a position to
say whether any of the bills would make the utility creditworthy.

 Q: Can the governor keep the legislature from recessing in order to force
them to pass an MOU?
 A: SoCal responded, "yes, I understand that he does have that power.  We are
running out of days.  The situation is becoming more critical.  We are on
borrowed time from our creditors now.  Anything that moves us toward
creditworthiness, we support."  (NOTE:  In actuality, the Governor can order
legislators to the floor for a vote, but they do not have to comply.  As
Burton said in the press today, "Only the legislature can force the
legislature to stay.")

Deutsche Bank Questions to SoCal
 Q: Is the transmission asset sale off the table or not?
 A: The sale is in the Assembly bill, but we "think it's more of an option in
the Senate bill, like it was in the San Diego deal."

 Q: What are your (SoCal's) thoughts on how the California Procurement
Adjustment (CPA) mechanism could be constructed to keep SoCal solvent and if
a change in the mechanism for reimbursing the DWR would be needed?
 A:   "We are highly focused on this."  The spokesperson stated that if
revenue is distributed in a manner "that puts the utility in a deteriorating
balance sheet situation, this will be seen as a very serious situation.  This
would be unacceptable.  Our cash position is currently stable.  These
changes, this would be a very serious event."

 Q: Has SoCal reached an agreement on paying the non-renewables or gas-fired
QFs 10% of what they are owed?
 A: SoCal indicated that it is still in negotiations with 4 of the larger
gas-fired QFs (IEP Projects).  SoCal indicated that it would make its 10%
payments once the PUC order to pay is final (a 30-day appeal period is still
in effect, according to SoCal).


This deal has reached a point where it needs to be placed upon your
respective radar screens, which this message hereby attempts to do. ----cgy
---------------------- Forwarded by Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT on 04/11/2001
03:55 PM ---------------------------

Tracy Ngo
04/11/2001 10:13 AM
To: Paul Choi/SF/ECT@ECT, Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Deseret DASH

---------------------- Forwarded by Tracy Ngo/PDX/ECT on 04/11/2001 10:21 AM
---------------------------
From: Chip Schneider/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/11/2001 09:52 AM
To: Tracy Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Deseret DASH

I believe the deal is changing, to some degree, from what is represented in
the DASH.

Regards,

Chip Schneider
713-853-1789
EB 2852


changed to caiso

	From:  Sharen Cason                           04/02/2001 02:13 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: #567553

This deal has an NP delivery point with firm energy.

thanks!


Eric,

I checked on Saturday and remembered that we have friends from Austin coming
into town.  Sorry that I couldn't help out.

Chris

	From:  Eric Bass @ ECT                           11/13/2000 10:34 AM

To: Chris Gaskill/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: A&M/UT Flag Football Invitation

Here is the info on the tourney.  We are one person short and could really
use your help.  Please try to let me know ASAP whether you can play so I can
explore other alternatives.

Thanks,

Eric
x3-0977
---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 11/13/2000 10:32 AM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Flag Football Challenge @ ENRON                           10/21/2000
10:38 PM

Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: Flag Football Invite
cc:
Subject: A&M/UT Flag Football Invitation

Enron and Andersen Consulting are proud to sponsor the 2nd Annual
Aggie-Longhorn
Flag Football Challenge on Saturday, November 18.  The purpose of this event
is to
raise money for both schools, and to enjoy the competitive spirit of the
third oldest rivalry
in college football.  This year's game marks the 107th meeting between Texas
A&M
University and The University of Texas, and, with a little luck, the Big 12
South Title
will be on the line!

Enron and Andersen Consulting are sponsoring the event, but we need your help
as
participants and fundraisers.  Contributions raised will benefit the general
scholarship fund
for each school.

The details:
Date:    Saturday, November 18th

Time:    10:00 a.m. - approximately 4 p.m. (Warm up is at 9:30 am)

Location:   Stratford High School Practice Fields (just off Dairy Ashford,
south of I-10)

Food and Drinks:  Schulze,s BBQ (FREE - courtesy of Enron)

Eligibility:   Full-time employees and/or their spouses
    (Players must have graduated from Texas A&M
 or The University of Texas )

Team Jerseys:  Provided by Enron and Andersen Consulting

Format:   7 players with at least 1 female player on the field at all times

Team Size: Recommend 8-10 players per team (no more than 10 per team)
 Contact the team captains to sign-up.  (Sign-up now to ensure your
 place on a team)

Prizes:    Winning team receives 16 tickets to the A&M/UT game in
Austin on Friday, November 24
    Winning team also owns the "Horns Down/Horns Up" trophy
until next year!

Fundraising Goal  The committee has set a goal of raising $16,000 for each
school.  This will require a contribution of $2,000 per team,
plus an equal amount from corporate matching funds.

Last year's event featured a last-minute comeback as the Enron Aggies Team 1
defeated the Enron
Longhorns Team 1 for the championship and took home the tickets and the
trophy.  This year, expect
the Longhorns (and Andersen Consulting) to come in with revenge on their
minds!

Thanks to the gracious gift from the UT Alumni, who redirected their
donations to the A&M Foundation,
we were able to permanently endow scholarships dedicated to the memory of the
12 Aggies who died
in last year's Bonfire collapse.  We believe this event is a great tradition
for both companies, and we are
pleased to be able to raise important funds for both institutions.

If you are interested in participating or otherwise being involved, you must
contact one of the team captains
below by the close of business on Friday, November 3 (phone or email).  Team
rosters will be filled on a
first-come, first-served basis.

Aggies           Longhorns
Brad Mauritzen  x33272             Webb Jennings x31944
Russ Porter       x58410                  Michael Simmons x37942


551260 - changed to 227

And I'm entering Jeff's deals right now - he went into a meeting and
neglected to finish deal entry!

Kate

Stephanie Piwetz   03/15/2001 02:26 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Checout 3/15/01

Kate
please check. still missing:
PREBON:
Richter:

Enron buys Aquila
236.00
May   np 15
25mws

Enron Sells pget
may np 15
25 mws
237.00

Enron Sells aquila
june   np 15
25 mws
275.00

please ch price on deal 551260.01  to 227.00

Amerex:
still missing:
Richter

Enron sells Mirant
apr   np 15  170.00  off peak

Enron sells aquila
june      peak np 15
275.00

Enron sells mirant
25 mws
3/19-3/31
265.00
np15


Tana,

Pursuant to your email below, PG&E was not allowed East Power yesterday and
today they are.  Could you please explain?

Thank you.

Lisa

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Jones, Tana
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 9:58 AM
To: Guidroz, Walter
Cc: Lees, Lisa; Sever, Stephanie
Subject: Re: FW: PG&E Energy Trading Entities

I am sorry I am just getting back to you, but I had to check with my whole
legal team around the world, and I just heard back from the final critical
one.  We are OK with them trading the products below.  However, on physical
power, they can only trade west power.  Stephanie, will you need to open them
up so they can trade immediately?

	Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate 04/23/2001 05:35 PM 	   To: Lisa
Lees/ENRON@enronXgate, Stephanie Sever/ENRON@enronXgate, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT  cc:   Subject: FW: PG&E Energy Trading Entities

Lisa/Stephanie, could you please ensure that the trading profiles for each of
the three PG&E entities are changed below such that by tomorrow morning they
will be able to transact once we restore their headroom once we enter it into
the system?

Tana, are you OK with restoring the changes reflected below?  I'm thinking
that since they had this transact ability once before, that it should be OK.

PLEASE LET ME KNOW IF THERE WILL BE ANY PROBLEMS.

Thanks all!

Walter

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Moran, Tom
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 5:08 PM
To: Guidroz, Walter
Subject: FW: PG&E Energy Trading Entities

Walter,

Could you ensure that the profiles are set-up accordingly and that CAS is
populated with a $5million minimum for each of these cp,s.

I do not want to turn them on in Datamanager until tomorrow am.

tm

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Conwell, Wendy
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 4:59 PM
To: Moran, Tom
Cc: Bradford, William S.; Ngo, Tracy; Sacks, Edward; Radous, Paul
Subject: PG&E Energy Trading Entities

Tom,

Per our discussion with Bill, please set up the following PG&E counterparties
on EOL providing for transactions having a maximum tenor of 12 MONTHS:

PG&E Energy Trading - Power L.P.-------> Physical Power
PG&E Energy Trading, Canada Corporation---------> Physical Canadian Gas
PG&E Energy Trading - Gas Corporation---------->Physical and Financial US Gas

Thanks,
Wendy


Just passing along my updated contact information. Hope all is going great,
speak to you soon.

Best regards,

Jeff B. Lenamon
Vice President
Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein
Credit & Counterparty Risk Mgmt
75 Wall Street, 33rd Floor
New York, NY 10005
Tel: 212-429-2118
fax: 212-429-2018

If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail
disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to
http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender.


I agree with everything in your summary except for of course the ridiculous parenthesis part in #2. But, as for rooting on the horns come Friday I cannot go along. From birth I have been conditioned to hate the Texas Longhorns. When I moved to the state of Texas at the age of 4 this emotion became so firmly ingrained in every fiber of my being that it is impossible for me to ever root for the horns. I can think of no circumstance in which I would ever root, cheer, or applaud the Texas Longhorns in any sporting event. I was even rooting for those faggy Europeans to beat Longhorn Lance Armstrong in that bicycle thingy-majig last year in France. So, yes, Friday morning I will be rooting that the horns embarrass themselves on national TV, that Chrissy is the laughing stock of the nation, and that the fake military and their brainwashed fans party the night away in that one horse town of College Station. If that happens my left-over turkey will taste that much better and if not the Sooners gain valuable bonus points. Either way, I win.


As many of you already know, Brett Hunsucker has accepted a new position with
ERCOT in Texas.  His new position is a Client Representative for the new
deregulated market.

We will be wishing Brett and Holly a fond farewell on Thursday evening.  The
time and place will be determined later this week, but please plan on joining
us to congratulate Brett on his new opportunity!


Rick, could you please give me a call when you have a second?  713-429-4151
or 281-221-3566 (cell).  Thanks.

Stephanie E. Wellman

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender.
******************************************************************


Start Date: 10/12/01; HourAhead hour: 14;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001101214.txt

Error retrieving HourAhead price data - process continuing...
---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 14 / Preferred:   0.00 / Final:   0.01)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 10/12/01
  TIE_POINT: SYLMAR_2_NOB
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_RED
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 10/12/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: CISO_EPMI_APS
  ENGY_TYPE: NFRM
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 14 / Preferred:   0.00 / Final:   0.01)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 10/12/01
  TIE_POINT: MEAD_2_WALC
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_ORANGE
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 14 / Preferred:   0.00 / Final:   0.01)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 10/12/01
  TIE_POINT: MALIN_5_RNDMTN
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_YELLOW
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 14 / Preferred:   0.00 / Final:   0.01)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 10/12/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_BLUE
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 14 / Preferred:   0.00 / Final:   0.01)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 10/12/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_GREEN
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 14 / Preferred:   0.00 / Final:   0.01)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 10/12/01
  TIE_POINT: FCORNR_5_PSUEDO
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_GOLD
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL


[IMAGE] [IMAGE]

Search  Amazon.com for:    We hope you  enjoyed receiving this message. However, if you'd rather not receive future  e-mails of this sort from Amazon.com, please visit your  Amazon.com  account page . In the Personal Information box under the Account  Settings heading, click the "Update your communication  preferences" link.
 Please note  that this e-mail was sent to the following address:  pmims@enron.com

[IMAGE]


I spoke to Amy before lunch... I need the $$ invoice from PSCo!!  She faxed
the volume (meter) statements which I needed also, but I need the summary
and the four individual (Bayfield, pines, Pagosa, La Plata) invoices showing
the reservation vols/ $$ and the commodity charges, etc.

Amy was going to call someone at the pipeline or I can try to call them to
express the urgency if you want me to.  Please help.

-Craig W. Lipke
Citizens Energy Supply
Phone (928) 226-2243
Fax     (928) 226-2168
Cell     (928) 699-3683


Hello,

I am an analyst working at EIM fundamentals in Houston and was wondering if I could be included in the distribution list that receives the bi-weekly Pulp newsletter.

thanks,
Monika Causholli


Yep.  We won't  miss him as much as we will Fergie if he goes though.  I
think if he's fully committed to being as good a pro as possible he could be
really good.  We'll see.


Hello all,

The program for the 2000 Texas Finance Festival has been formalized and can
be found on our web site at

http://hsb.baylor.edu/html/martinj/festival2.html

I do need to remind you of a few things before we converge on San Antonio.
First, be sure to contact the convention hotel and make your reservations.
At last count there were only 6 rooms left.  Second, I need a completed
application form from everyone so that we can get an accurate meal count.
I am attaching the program announcement so you can fill out the appropriate
boxes for meals and numbers of guests in the event you have not sent in a
form.

Remember that we are starting the conference off with a luncheon on Friday
so plan on arriving early Friday or coming in on Thursday evening if you
can.  Our hotel is right on the river and there are lots of restaurants and
interesting things to visit in the immediate area (the Alamo is across the
plaza from the hotel).

We are making plans for spouses and children to attend both the dinner on
Friday and Saturday evenings.  The Friday evening dinner begins at 6 p.m.
so that we can be done in plenty of time for our private guided tour of the
Alamo at 8:00 p.m.  For Saturday we are still working out plans for the
evening so stay tuned.

There will be more information later as the conference nears.  Looking
forward to seeing you all and in beautiful, sunny San Antonio.

John - announcerev.doc

John D. Martin
Carr P. Collins Chair in Finance
Finance Department
Baylor University
PO Box 98004
Waco, TX 76798
254-710-4473 (Office)
254-710-1092 (Fax)
J_Martin@Baylor.edu
web:    http://hsb.baylor.edu/html/martinj/home.html


Catherine,

I have received the call and will be traveling to Kazakhstan next week to complete the adoption.  My husband and son are staying back.  I arrive in Almaty on the 14th late in the evening.   I'll spend the day of the 15th in Almaty and then take the overnight train to Taraz.  I expect to have a court date in Taraz on the 19th or 20th.  Then I will be back in Almaty, probably over Christmas.  Finally, I expect to travel to Moscow on around Dec 27 and then return to Houston around Dec 30.  This of course is the plan if everything goes exactly on schedule -- which it probably won't.

I will certainly miss being away from home at Christmas and am hoping to find a Christmas worship service in Almaty.   I'd appreciate any advice in this regard.

I would also appreciate advice on what time of clothes are appropriate to bring.

Thanks
Shelley Corman

shelley.corman@enron.com

and

cormanerb@cs.com


NOTE:  YOU WILL RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE EACH TIME YOU ARE SELECTED AS A REVIEWER.

You have been selected to participate in the Year End 2000 Performance
Management process by providing meaningful feedback on specific employee(s).
Your feedback plays an important role in the process, and your participation
is critical to the success of Enron's Performance Management goals.

To complete requests for feedback, access PEP at http://pep.corp.enron.com
and select Perform Review under Performance Review Services.  You may begin
providing feedback immediately and are requested to have all feedback forms
completed by Friday, November 17, 2000.

If you have any questions regarding PEP or your responsibility in the
process, please contact the PEP Help Desk at:

Houston: 1.713.853.4777, Option 4
London:  44.207.783.4040, Option 4
Email: perfmgmt@enron.com

Thank you for your participation in this important process.

The following is a CUMULATIVE list of employee feedback requests with a
status of "OPEN."   Once you have submitted or declined an employee's request
for feedback, their name will no longer appear on this list.

Review Group: ENRON
Feedback Due Date: Nov 17, 2000

Employee Name                   Supervisor Name                 Date Selected
-------------                   ---------------                 -------------
ELLEDGE, SUSAN                  LINDA S BRYAN                   Nov 02, 2000
MAHMASSANI, SOUAD               KAM N KEISER                    Nov 07, 2000
WHITE, JESSICA                  GEORGE F SMITH                  Nov 07, 2000
WILLIAMS, JASON C               ROBERT A SUPERTY                Nov 02, 2000


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Peter Loncto <pdl8pdl8@yahoo.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, August 01, 2001 12:52 PM
To:	Rogers, Benjamin
Subject:	RE:

Hey Ben,

Finally getting settled in, here's my new info:

3842 Jewell St K303
San Diego, 92109
home 858-483-2641
work 619-652-5477
cell 858-349-8312

Enjoy the MV trip.  Get in touch if you're ever in
town.

Pete

--- Benjamin.Rogers@enron.com wrote:
> Peter:
> Gppd tp hear from you.  Congrats on heading out to
> CA - thats great.  I
> know that you been wanting to head west for some
> time now.  Work is going
> well, I'm in the power trading group, trading MW's.
> I'm visiting my folks
> up in the Vineyard in the beginnning of August, so
> it will be good to hang
> out up East.  I haven't seen Derek lately, I know he
> is in H town, working
> for the summer.  Well, good luck with moving out
> west and keep in touch.
> Talk to you soon.
> Ben
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>    From:   "Pete Loncto" <pdl8@cornell.edu>@ENRON
>
>
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Pete+20Loncto+22+20+3Cpdl8+40cornell+2Eedu+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
>
>
>    Sent:   Thursday, July  5, 2001 5:48 PM
>    To:     Rogers, Benjamin
>    Subject:
>
>    Ben!
>    Whats happening down in HOuston?  Got some big
> news on my end - I am
>    moving
>    out to San Diego to start a job with
> Nicholas-Applegate Capital
>    Management.
>    I've been on vaca, working on my golf game and
> tan since graduating
>    Cornell
>    in May and move out this week.  Looking forward
> to the job and the
>    lifestyle - I'll be living a few blocks from the
> beach and never have to
>    see
>    snow again!  I'll send along full contact info
> once I get fully settled
>    in a
>    couple of weeks.  COme visit if you are ever out
> that way.  Hope all is
>    well.
>    Pete
>
>
>
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/


Start Date: 4/24/01; HourAhead hour: 11;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042411.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 11 / Preferred:   0.00 / Final:   0.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EES
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/24/01
  UNIT_ID: BADLND_7_PL1X2

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 11 / Preferred: 132.77 / Final: 132.70)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: SDG1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/24/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


--
================================================
Matt Hsu
Interwoven
Technical Account Manager, Northwest Region

503.515.7110 cell
360.258.0616 desk
360.258.0615 fax
matt.hsu@interwoven.com

Moving Business to the web.
Visit http://www.interwoven.com
================================================


Grant,

Your call. Any day would work for me.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/29/2000
03:15 PM ---------------------------

Sevil Yaman <syaman@Bayou.UH.EDU> on 02/29/2000 12:17:44 PM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc: Grant.Masson@enron.com
Subject: Re: Thank You

Dr. Kaminski,
I can stop by any Thursday or Friday to meet Grant. I think that will
be great for me to understand better what you are doing in your group
and I will be doing this summer. Could you let me know which day would
work for you, please?

Sevil Yaman
Department of Economics
University of Houston
Houston, TX 77204-5882
(713) 743-3814 / 3817

On Thu, 24 Feb 2000 Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com wrote:

>
> Sevil.
>
> We are looking forward to having you here.
> If you want, you can stop by one day and I shall introduce you
> to Grant Masson with whom you will be working this summer.
>
> Vince
>
>
>
>
>
> Sevil Yaman <syaman@Bayou.UH.EDU> on 02/23/2000 10:09:30 AM
>
> To:   vkamins@enron.com
> cc:
> Subject:  Thank You
>
>
>
> Hi Dr. Kaminski,
>
> Yesterday, I learned from Shannon Rogers at the associate-analyst program
> that I was offered a summer associate/internship position in your group. I
> am already very excited about this position and look forward to working in
> your group. Many thanks for your consideration.
>
>
> Sevil Yaman
> Department of Economics
> University of Houston
> Houston, TX 77204-5882
> (713) 743-3814 / 3817
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


Attached are two of TradersNews Energy's three new  hourly indexes, for the
ComEd and TVA hubs. We will send you these new hourly  indexes at no charge
until March 19, when we formally launch them on our Web  site, at
www.tradersnewsenergy.com.
?
If you'd like to receive our ERCOT hourly index or have questions or
feedback about that region, e-mail Suzanna Strangmeier, at
suzanna.strangmeier@ipgdirect.com.
?
Otherwise, please contact me with any feedback or  questions. Thank you.
?
Bobette  Riner???????????????????????????????
Director of Indexes
TradersNews Energy
713/647-8690
FAX:  713/647-7552
cell: 832/428-7008
bobette.riner@ipgdirect.com
http://www.tradersnewsenergy.com
?
?
 - comedhrly030501.doc
 - tvahrly030501.doc


Parties to the Gas OII PG&E Settlement:

Last week, on June 13th, PG&E held a workshop to discuss proposed tariffs to
implement the Comprehensive PG&E Settlement Agreement resolving all issues
concerning PG&E in the Gas Strategy Investigation at the CPUC.  At that
meeting, parties raised various issues concerning the draft tariffs we had
previously distributed, and we promised we would write up and provide the
parties with a list of these issues.  That list is attached.

Also attached is a schedule of next steps, including dates for PG&E to
provide responses to the issues raised at the tariff workshop, and for the
parties to provide further comments.  We have also decided to hold two
additional meetings to discuss tariff issues.  These are:

June 30, Friday, 10:00 a.m., Room 301b, 77 Beale St., SF
PG&E Hosts Half-Day Workshop on Metering Issues

July 6, Thursday,  1:30 p.m., Room 301b, 77 Beale St., SF
PG&E Hosts Half-Day Tariff Workshop on any Unresolved Issues

Thanks for all your help in finalizing these tariffs.

> Ron Stoner     Randy Litteneker
> (415) 973-3606    (415) 973-2179
>
>
>
 <<June 13th issues.doc>>  <<OII Tariff Schedule for Parties.doc>>

 - June 13th issues.doc
 - OII Tariff Schedule for Parties.doc


Stuart / John

I have not heard from you on the matter for some time and didn't get a
response to my e-mail to you some months ago (16 Nov 99).

I note that we have since resumed trading with Hyundai (albeit with Hyundai
Corporation and not Hyundai Singapore Pte Ltd which was the counterparty in
the Pacific Valour case). I also understand that Enron Clean Fuels Company
has chartered a vessel from Chembuk Trading which our broker advised to be an
affiliate of MTM Ship Management (the bareboat charterers of the Pacific
Valour and the likely respondents in an arbitration).

I presume the decision is therefore not to take the matter to arbitration and
would like to close my file on the matter. However, if my understanding is
incorrect, please let me have your instructions.

Many thanks and regards

Matt


Rod,

As we discussed earlier today, I am attaching an updated  proposal:

Regards,

Soma


[IMAGE]
		[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	START SHOPPING Baseball Basketball Fitness Golf Outdoor Running Soccer Equipment Fan Shop Footwear Women's Shopping Help Desk
		*Offer Details Offer expires October 26, 2001 at 3:00 PM PST.  This offer cannot be used with any other coupon/promotion. This offer does not apply to shipping, handling and tax.  Active.com reserves the right to terminate or modify the promotion at anytime.  Certain products and brands may not be eligible for this promotion, including but not limited to Nike, Jordan, Callaway, Cleveland Golf, Titleist, Columbia, Pacemaster, Cybex and Odyssey.

If, for any reason, you would prefer not to receive any future e-mail offers from Active.com,
send a blank e-mail to:leave-special-offer-588838X@mail.active.com


this is kind of funny . . . but not true  :)

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Shanna Husser @ EES                           02/12/2001 07:26 AM

To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fwd: Fw: UT Fans - So True!

Look what this mean person made up about your school!
---------------------- Forwarded by Shanna Husser/HOU/EES on 02/12/2001 07:26
AM ---------------------------

Christina Barthel@ENRON
02/12/2001 07:23 AM
To: Rafael Avila/NA/Enron, "Becky Bliss" <blbliss@hewitt.com>, Leon
Branom/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Kim Chick/HOU/EES, Robert B
Cothran/Corp/Enron@ENRON, "Anne Denley" <ADenley@vailresorts.com>, "jason
eggenburger" <jasonegg@hotmail.com>, Emily Ferguson/ENRON@enronXgate,
"Meredith" <meredith@friersoncpa.com>, Ryan Hinze/Corp/Enron, Shanna
Husser/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, "Toby Gouw" <tgouw@teamworks.ws>, Ben
Huxen/NA/Enron, "Juranek, Andrew A" <JuranAA@texaco.com>, Lynna
Kacal/Corp/Enron@ENRON, "Erin Landers" <elaggie99@hotmail.com>, "Jared
McDaniel" <jaredmcdaniel@hotmail.com>, "Anthony Moawad" <amoawad@kpmg.com>,
Chris Ochoa/NA/Enron, "Jaimie"<Jaimie_Parker@hotmail.com>, "Tracie Reed"
<traciereed99@hotmail.com>, "Brandon" <brandon.shimer@imgfinancialgroup.com>,
"Jose" <jose.a.suarez@us.pwcglobal.com>, Raul Yzquierdo/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
cc:
Subject: Fwd: Fw: UT Fans - So True!

From: "Kelly Kohrman" <pyrowoman@hotmail.com>
To: albert_ferrel@yahoo.com, ashbaylor@hotmail.com,
Ashley.Victorick@coastalcorp.com, aggie_guy21@yahoo.com,
CharlesPotterMail@yahoo.com, christina_ag99@hotmail.com, jadajot@yahoo.com,
jaf4678@neo.tamu.edu, j_a_garner@yahoo.com, laftamu@excite.com,
long@astrosfan.net, SLogan@TXLMortgage.com, AggieTia98@worldnet.att.net
Subject: Fwd: Fw: UT Fans - So True!
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2001 22:55:29

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

 - ut1.gif