----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 02/28/2001 02:07 PM -----

	Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>
	02/27/2001 01:52 PM

		 To: Hedy Govenar <hgovenar@govadv.com>, Mike Day <MDay@GMSSR.com>, Bev
Hansen <bhansen@lhom.com>, Jeff Dasovich <jdasovic@enron.com>, Susan J Mara
<smara@enron.com>, Joseph Alamo <JAlamo@enron.com>, Paul Kaufman
<paul.kaufman@enron.com>, Michael McDonald <Michael.McDonald@enron.com>,
David Parquet <David.Parquet@enron.com>, Rick Johnson
<rick.johnson@enron.com>, Marcie Milner <mmilner@enron.com>, Sandra McCubbin
<Sandra.McCubbin@enron.com>, Tim Belden <Tim.Belden@enron.com>, Rick Shapiro
<rshapiro@enron.com>, Jim Steffes <james.d.steffes@enron.com>, Alan Comnes
<acomnes@enron.com>, Chris Calger <ccalger@enron.com>, Mary Hain
<mary.hain@enron.com>, Joe Hartsoe <Joe.Hartsoe@enron.com>, Donna Fulton
<Donna.Fulton@enron.com>, Steven Kean <Steven.J.Kean@enron.com>, Karen Denne
<kdenne@enron.com>, Beverly Aden <beverly.aden@enron.com>, Bill Votaw
<bill.votaw@enron.com>, Carol Moffett <carol.moffett@enron.com>, Debora
Whitehead <debora.whitehead@enron.com>, Dennis Benevides
<dennis.benevides@enron.com>, Don Black <don.black@enron.com>, Dorothy
Youngblood <dorothy.youngblood@enron.com>, "dblack@enron.com"
<dblack@enron.com>, "emelvin@enron.com" <emelvin@enron.com>,
"ehughes2@enron.com" <ehughes2@enron.com>, "gweiss@enron.com"
<gweiss@enron.com>, "gsavage@enron.com" <gsavage@enron.com>,
"Harry.Kingerski@enron.com" <Harry.Kingerski@enron.com>, "kgustafs@enron.com"
<kgustafs@enron.com>, Mike D Smith <msmith1@enron.com>, "sgahn@enron.com"
<sgahn@enron.com>, "vsharp@enron.com" <vsharp@enron.com>, "wcurry@enron.com"
<wcurry@enron.com>, "William.S.Bradford@enron.com"
<William.S.Bradford@enron.com>, Leslie Lawner <Leslie.Lawner@enron.com>, John
Neslage <john.neslage@enron.com>, Ken Smith <ken@kdscommunications.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Ken Smith Documents

Attached, please find two proposed documents from Ken Smith for review
and comment:

 - 39 billion dollar fix.rtf
 - Constructive plan.rtf


Andy,

Thanks for taking the time in reading the posting agreement and making
comments.

It is worth remembering that given a choice we would not be entering into
this posting agreement.    The historical agreement with MG dictates many of
the variances we will see from your other posting agreements.

Given the short time frame here, Justin is in the process of trying to set up
a call with Travis and you for later today.  I have tried to address a couple
of the points you raise below.

regards
bruce

Andy Zipper@ENRON
11/27/2000 09:49 PM
To: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, Bruce Garner/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: eMetra posting agreement

I have read and reviewed the Posting Agreement. Let me preface my comments by
saying that I'm sure there is stuff in the Posting Agreement that I am
missing and I really want Travis McCullough to review it. I'm also curious as
to why in certain sections it is faithful to the agreement I sent  and in
other places seems to stray or omits things. Anyway here are my comments:

1). Whereas (A). How many eMetra platforms are there ? what does
"collectively the Platforms" mean ? The agreement should be specific as to
which platforms eMetra can display prices on.  There are two platforms one
physical and one financial.  The primary focus of this agreement is on
financial platform.

2). Regulatory Event, This language should really mirror the Posting
Agreements in place. The language should cover the situation that if any of
the events mentioned subject Enron or any of its affiliates to regulation it
is a Regulatory Event, even if it does not impact upon the way eMetra
conducts its business as contemplated by the agreement.

3). Term 2.2, There is no time limit on the date that eMetra commences LME
trading. Given that the language is worded as the later of" this leaves them
with all the leverage. It should be the earlier of. This is a big one as they
could sit around forever trying to make it work and we are still bound by an
agreement that runs 18 months from forever.  I agree with you on this one.
Starting the clock now does not work but we should be able to set the clock
at 18 months from Ap 30, 2001.

4). Establishment and Maintenance of Interfaces 4.1 We need to agree on who
is responsible for what interfaces in this agreement, upfront. These were
detailed in the agreement I sent to you. They are to responsible for
maintaining the interfaces so we do not want to build them. In general we are
responsible for specifying the interfaces and they are responsible for
building and operating them. Once again, please refer to the posting
agreement that was sent for the exhibits detailing this.

5). Execution of Transactions 5.1 All parties agree to be bound by Enron's
General Terms and Conditions.  We can discuss on the phone call.

6) Execution of Transactions 5.2.3 Please use the exact language from the
Posting  Agreement sent. This wording is unclear. There is no time of
transacting as there is no transaction unless price and volume are available
at time of receipt of proposed transaction.

7). Execution of Transactions General comment: There is no language referring
to eMetra taking responsibility for Mapping Errors. This is a big issue. We
will not be responsible if they incorrectly display our prices, i.e. 3 mo.
Aluminium displayed as 6 mo. Aluminium. Please refer to Posting Agreement for
language.  I agree

8). Co-Operation 7.2 and 7.3 I would like to see both of these deleted. We
have not given this to anyone else and it seems to be indirect conflict with
13. This section pretty much rules out that we market EnronOnline to our
customers and I don't see how we can live with it.  I think we would be
willing to substitute some form of non-disparagement language in its place.
We are balancing a couple of issues here.  Some of this is specific for
Emetra.  John Sherriff has been involved in the business issues that have
been agreed to.  Not withstanding the support of Emetra, we believe we have
the freedom to market EOL and are released from the non-compete.

9). Default and Termination 9.1.1  How is the release from the non-compete
tied to breach of this agreement ? There is no link between breach under this
agreement and non-compete.

10). Default and Termination 9.1.1 Strike the term material from sentence.
All parts of this agreement are material or they wouldn't be in it. Fine

11).  Default and Termination 9.1.4 and Enron Operational Failure. This is
too broad. Only the failure of an aspect of the Enron platform that affects
participants ability to conduct business with Enron through eMetra is
relevant.  Fine

12). Cost and Expenses. eMetra bears all costs relating to connectivity (i.e.
T1's)  between eMetra to the Enron platform. Fine

13). Assignment should read "eMetra's right to display Enron's prices..."
Fine

As I said earlier I'm sure there are things I 've left out and strongly
suggest that Travis review it before signing.

Thanks,
Andy


Rick -

 I've printed the budget report for your cost center.

The cost center report indicates that the budget for outside services if
8,685,000 so we will need to talk to Elizabeth or someone in accounting why
that number is not 9,000,000.

The cost center report indicates that we have spent 1,137,638.34 for outside
services which leaves a variance to budget of 7,547,361.66 available.

The RCR Budget Report indicates that we have approved 2,235,071 year to
date.  If you take the amount spent for outside services plus the amount
approved to date for RCR's the total equals 3,372,709.34.  If you take the
3,372,709.34 less budget the variance is 5,312,290.66 available.  That
assumes that the approved to date RCR will all be spent in 2001 and does not
account for what has been spent to date for RCR costs.

The budget report for your cost center indicates that actuals year to date
equal 4,951,697.40 compared to an annual budget of 21,437,591 leaves a
variance of 16,485,893.60 available for the year.

 I hope this information is helpful and is what you needed.  Call with any
questions, comments or concerns.

Eric

========================================================

----- Forwarded by Eric Benson/NA/Enron on 03/20/2001 11:33 AM -----

	Eric Benson
	03/20/2001 11:18 AM

		 To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: RCR Budget Report

Rick - I'm running the SAP report for March for your cost center and that
will confirm the budget number and let you know how much was
charged/coded/paid to date for outside services; the total budget for outside
services is 9 million; I'll send another email with the budget information as
soon as the reports print; the RCR budget report shows the variance between
amount approved and budget but does not show the amount charged to date
against those RCR's but I can run a report with that information; let me
know; thanks - Eric

==========================================

	Richard Shapiro
	03/20/2001 10:32 AM

		 To: Eric Benson/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: RCR Budget Report

where is the rest of the  outside services budget  captured? Total is around
11 million...correct??

Eric Benson on 03/20/2001 10:24:57 AM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: RCR Budget Report

Rick -

attached for your review and information is a quick spreadsheet that let's
you know where we are on the RCR budget as of today.  Please advise if you
would like this report sent to the other members of the RCR Committee.

=================================

also - I have monthly reports for all except Jean Ryall and Aleck Dadson; I
talked to Jean yesterday and she is working on the report and should have
something to me by noon today; I talked to Aleck and he said that he has a
new assistant and is working on the report but that the list of projects he
provided for the direct reports meeting is still accurate and there are no
changes; I'll send the resources report and the monthly reports received
since my last email to your attention later today; call with any questions or
if you need the information sooner than this afternoon

Eric


Although incorporated in December 1999, an announcement memo was not distributed at that time due to lack of sufficient ownership documentation.  To bring this company in line with other Enron subsidiaries, below is the announcement memo:

Enron SB 2 Nominee Limited, n/k/a ESB2 Investments Limited  (Company #75Z - SB2N), was incorporated in England on 3 December 1999.  Particulars are:

PARENT COMPANY(IES):
				Enron SB 2 (100%)

BUSINESS PURPOSE:		Nominee Shareholder for shares in European Power Holdings

SHARES:			Authorized:  1,000, p.v. ?1.00
				Issued:  1

DIRECTORS/OFFICERS:		See attached Corporate Data Sheet

EMPLOYEES:			No

TAX:  Please apply for FEIN, if necessary
TREASURY:  Banking resolutions adopted on 12/14/1999
CORPORATE RECORDS:  Please recycle minute book

Larry Pardue
Supervisor, Corporate Services
     and Assistant Secretary
Enron Corp.
1400 Smith Street, Suite 4804
Houston, TX 77002
Tel  +713 345 5376
Fax  +713 646 8007
email:  larry.pardue@enron.com


I have two Australian counterparties on the referenced list, State
Electricity Commission of Victoria and Straits Resources Limited, and I
haven't heard from you, and I need to get that list out.  When you send your
approval, can you be specific as to whether they are approval for Australian
products only, or all products.  Thanks!


Hunter,

My name is Adrian Clark and I am an executive recruiter in the energy
industry.  One of my industry sources referred you to me and said you were
the head of a trading desk there.  My firm, First Call Associates, searches
for qualified candidates for energy trading and marketing companies across
North America and Europe.  I am curious to know if you would be interested
in discussing new job opportunities we are working on.

You can find more information about my firm at www.firstcallassociates.com.
We are very familiar with the nuances of the energy trading business and
have built relationships with many energy companies enabling us to present
qualified employees for their consideration.

Be assured that any information we discuss will be completely confidential.
My apologies for sending this to your email at work but I have not been
successful reaching you during business hours.

Adrian Clark
Director
First Call Associates, Inc.
8 Andrew Dr.
Canton, CT  06019
(860)693-4122
(860)693-4118 (fax)

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Adrian Clark" <AClark@firstcallassociates.com>
To: <AClark@firstcallassociates.com>
Subject: Adrian Clark
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 10:15:28 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Importance: Normal

Executive recruiter in the energy and telecommunications industries.


Please see reference to tax attorney below.  Sara
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 09/10/99 01:18
PM ---------------------------

"LOPEZ AUFRANC, Patricia" <PLA@marval.com.ar> on 09/10/99 01:04:35 PM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: "GOTLIB, Gabriel" <GG@marval.com.ar>
Subject: RE: Review of Enron ISDA Schedule

Sara:

I will be pleased to see ou either on Tuesday 14, 11-12.30 am; Wednesday
afternoon anytime before 18.30 or Thursday at your convenience.

You shall receive the comments to the Schedule and other documents shortly.

The English speaking tax lawyer you should contact Gabriel Gotlib at
54-11-4310-0159 or at gg@marval.com.ar

In the meantime I will forward you a "preview" of an article on taxation
that Gabriel and I have written.

Looking forward to seeing you.

Best regards

Patricia

> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: Sara Shackleton [SMTP:sshackl@ect.enron.com]
> Enviado el: Viernes, 10 de Septiembre de 1999 01:10 p.m.
> Para: pla@marval.com.ar
> Asunto: Review of Enron ISDA Schedule
>
>
>
> I will be in Enron's BA office from September 14 - September 17 (Tuesday -
> Friday).  I would like to schedule some time to review the ISDA Schedule
> previously sent to you for comment.  Other than the morning and early
> afternoon
> of Sept. 15 (Wed.), I am free to schedule an appointment with you.  If you
> have
> comments to the Schedule, please send them to me in Houston.  I will be in
> the
> Houston office until Monday afternoon.
>
> Also, does the Marval firm have an English speaking tax lawyer who could
> assist
> Enron Houston tax on Argentine trading issues?  Please let me know as soon
> as
> possible.
>
> I look forward to hearing from you.  Regards.  Sara
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Este mensaje es confidencial. Puede contener informacion amparada
por el secreto profesional. Si usted ha recibido este e-mail por error,
por favor comuniquenoslo inmediatamente via e-mail y tenga la
amabilidad de eliminarlo de su sistema; no debera copiar el mensaje
ni divulgar su contenido a ninguna persona. Muchas gracias.

This message is confidential. It may also contain information that is
privileged or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you have
received it by mistake please let us know by e-mail immediately and
delete it from your system; should also not copy the message nor
disclose its contents to anyone. Many thanks.
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------


At approximately 5:00pm Tice Electrical will be shutting down partial power
in the first two rows of the trading floor. Anything plugged into the orange
colored outlets will not be affected, however any workstations, monitors, or
anything else not plugged into the orange outlets will lose power for about
15-20 minutes. The two Real Time desks will not be affected with any power
loss but it's possible other workstations within these two rows might lose
power. If anyone is still in the office and working you will receive fair
warning before the outage takes place. Everyone in the first two rows
(excluding real time) please shut down your computer before leaving tonight.
If you have any questions please contact myself or Debra Davidson. Thanks,
Chip Cox


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/16/2001 09:09 PM -----

	Jean Munoz <jmunoz@mcnallytemple.com>
	02/16/2001 03:53 PM

		 To: IEP <jmunoz@mcnallytemple.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re-cap of Rep Caucus Briefing

The Republican Caucus briefing Thursday was well attended, and members were
appreciative of the fact that Jan and other members of IEP took the time to
brief them.  The feedback we've heard from Republican Leader Bill Campbell's
office and others is that the handouts IEP provided were great, and the
presentations very informative.  In fact, several members acknowledged that
they had never heard the message communicated in such a clear, concise way.

Just fyi, one issue that is on the radar screen of Republicans is the fact
that generators have not been paid -- yet they still continue to supply
electricity to California.

We have offered to brief the Democrat Caucus, but they have not expressed
interest thus far.  We will continue trying!

Below is a list of those who attended the meeting.

Thanks,
Jean

--
Jean Munoz
McNally Temple Associates, Inc.
916-447-8186
916-447-6326 (fx)

______________________________________
Honorable Sam Aanestad
and staff Brett Michelin

Honorable Bob Pacheco

Honorable Pat Bates
and staff Russell Lowry

Honorable Anthony Pescetti
and staff Steve McCarthy

Assembly Republican Leader Bill Campbell
and staff Barbara Brown

Honorable Mark Wyland
and staff Stefanie Curry

Honorable John Campbell
and staff Matt Back

Honorable Phil Wyman
and staff Gina Zari

Honorable Dave Cox

Honorable Dick Dickerson

Honorable Dave Kelley

Honorable Jay LaSuer

Honorable Lynne Leach

Honorable Bill Leonard

Staff Attending on Behalf of Absent Member
Steffanie Watkins d Roy Ashburn
Rock Zierman d Mike Briggs
Aaron Bone d Dave Cogdill
Nancy Leneis d Dennis Mountjoy
Jerilyn Stanley d Rod Pacheco
Dan Pellissier d Keith Richman
Sarah Sprouse d Tony Strickland

Policy Consultants:
David Nunenkamp
Phil Nails

Staff from Senator McClintock, Senator Brulte,
Senator McPherson, and Senator Johannessen also attended


Jeff:

OPEC meeting was crazy.  Saudis are behaving strangely; they seem like they really don't have their act together.  It looks bearish for the time being -- WTI in the teens over the next few months unless war fears take it up.

I'm stopping in DC on the way home and will see you on Monday.  Hopefully we can talk shop sometime.

Clay


Attached is draft 4 of the Operations and Procedures Policy which David has
been putting together - this really should highlight all of the issues and
facilitate understanding - this is not a final document but if your
understanding differs from what is in the document.  It is imperative you
repond immediately.

Thanks

Louise


---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Booth/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
11/28/2000 06:00 PM ---------------------------

	Enron Engineering & Construction Company
	From:  Eric Booth                           11/28/2000 04:52 PM

To: Eric Boyt/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Jeffrey M Keenan@ECT, Terri Austin/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Kathleen Clark/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kay Mann@ENRON

Subject: Austin - S&S Contract

Eric-

I revised the contract you sent me to make it site specific.  Those changes
are redlined.  Please note that I have reinserted sections 10.4.1 and 10.4.3
as well as the defined terms that go with them.  These were related to
exhaust temperature and energy.  I know this is a simple cycle plant and they
typically aren't required, but I wanted to see if GE would guarantee it
anyway.  It maybe helpful in the future if Austin Energy goes combined
cycle.  If for some reason GE's lawyers specifically want to leave that out,
then they will probably also want to delete sections 10.4.2 and 10.4.4 (and
their defined terms) since those also talk about specific exhaust
guarantees.  Let me know what they decide.

Exhibit A (site basis conditions) which I also revised was not attached to
your file.  (It's right behind the sign-off pages in my hard copy.)  I
therefor hand marked up a copy and scanned it.  It is now attached as a
separate word file.

Exhibit F is "boiler plate" and shouldn't change.  Exhibit "U" is not in my
hard copy.  My copy only goes up to Exhibit "T."   If you get something from
GE on Exhibit "U", send it to me and I will be glad to review it.

If you have questions, give me a call.  (67550)  I will be in Ausitn
Wednesday and Thursday, but will be available by cell phone (713) 412-6873.

Thanks,
Eric Booth


Columbia River Basin and Lower Snake.....Updated:   Jan  3, 2002 at 11:38


Read about Enron's inclusion on the Gay Financial Network's "gfn.com 50" in eBiz.

Also in this issue:
FGT's Phase IV expansion
Clickpaper.com is added to two industry web sites
EES uses the 'Net to catch new customers
Learn what a swap is

It's all in the latest eBiz .  Go to home.enron.com , click Publications, then click eBiz, and "eBiz May 11, 2001."


TD{FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; BACKGROUND-COLOR: white}
[IMAGE]

Now that you have access to the following applications without requiring VPN access...  Outlook Web Access (email and calendar) PEP XMS (Expense Reporting application)  And, COMING SOON... eHROnline (year-end) Benefits Election (Oct. 29, 2001) Electronic Pay Stubs (year-end), and Much More,  through the ClickAtHome Portal and the Internet, do you still believe you need remote access through VPN from home to Enron networks (must have a valid business reason with supervisor approval and a monthly cost)?   YES NO NOT SURE Please answer this survey from your computer at work, not via Outlook Web Access.


FYI

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Renee Schroll <RJSchroll@midcogen.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:11 AM
To:	Polsky, Phil
Subject:	Payment discrepancies

Phil:

After quickly looking at invoices since Jan 2000, it appears the majority of
the problems started to occur in early 2001. There are only small rounding
differences occurring in 2000. It also looks like there were several months
where MCV overpaid the Enron invoice to comply with the contract price.

Let me know if you need further information from me.

Ren?e Schroll
Mgr, Gas Financial Reporting
Midland Cogeneration Venture

PH   (989) 633-7854
FAX (989) 633-7857


SK - I've printed this out & put in the folder w/ the others.  mm

Happy New Year to you and your family, Steve!  I hope you got something of a
break despite all the brushfires.

Please find attached the 2000 achievements that you asked for.  The only
thing I didn't put down is that I had a whole lot of fun doing all these
things!

Please let me know if you need any further details.

Best wishes.

Jackie


On Thursday, April 12th, I forwarded to you a series of Advice filings which
SCE made on April 11.  The attached document summarizes those filings.
While two the three appear to be fairly innocuous, one (1534-E) apparently
starts the process of implementing the MOU with the governor.  Please pay
careful attention to your review of that advice. If we are to protest, such
protest would be due on May 1.

 <<X23609.DOC>>

Jeanne Bennett

 - X23609.DOC


January 26-28, 2001

     No Flow


I couldn't find Mark on the directory - would someone please forward this to
him?  Here is the message from Steve O.

-----Original Message-----
Date:  07/08/2000  01:53 pm  (Saturday)
From:  "Oldham, Steve" <soldham@sierrapacific.com>
To:  "'Jonathan Ater'" <Jaa@aterwynne.com>, "Elliot, Beth"
     <BElliot@sppc.com>, "Ponn, Doug" <dponn@sierrapacific.com>,
     "Ruelle, Mark" <mruelle@sierrapacific.com>, "Oldham, Steve"
     <soldham@sierrapacific.com>, "Peterson, William"
     <wpeterson@sierrapacific.com>
CC:  "'pamela_lesh@pgn.com'" <pamela_lesh@pgn.com>
Subject:  RE: Important -  Further Information

Jonathan, I have spoken with Mitch Taylor and Pamela this morning after
talking to you.  While both calls were cut short, after I talked to Mitch he
was encouraging us to go with our original sur-rebuttle and not with the
revised Ruelle testimony.  At the same time Pamela was worried that we
needed to stick with the original sur-rebuttle and to incorporate the
changes that she felt were important to make.  My concern all along is that
we correctly inform the OPUC as to the facts in Nevada while at the same
time getting this transaction closed.  It seems to me that the common wisdom
of those closest to the OPUC and the OPUC staff is to file the sur-rebuttle
that outlines our plans for the PGE acquistion and rate plan, responds to
staffs concerns raised in their rebuttle and to do so on Monday.  Pamela
suggested that we could inform all of the parties, which includes the OPUC
of the events that are likely to be disclosed on Monday via letter.   During
our conversation it was clear that Mitch had concerns about using the
rebuttle testimony as the way to convey our current status in Nevada to the
parties in Oregon.  I would like to suggest that we follow the advice that
we are getting from PGE and Enron on this as they are closest to the OPUC
staff and others in Oregon.  We will need to add a couple of paragraphs to
Mark's testimony that will make what he testifys to in District Court on
Monday consistant with the sur-rebuttle in Oregon.  We will go back to my
original sur-rebuttle as improved by PGE, Enron, yourself and Beth for
filing on Monday.  Coupled with the responses we make to the OPUC staff next
week on the recent data requests we can make sure that we have informed all
parties of the critical facts in Nevada.  This all makes sense to me as we
will know more on Monday after the District Court hearing in Nevada, we will
have made our press release and energy filing in Nevada and all parties will
then be informed as to the nature of whats going on.  I am still hopeful
that we will have resolution to the situation in Nevada in a timly manner
but I cannot be sure of it.  Thanks for the hard work this weekend on the
tough issues and for your advice in how best to get the deal with PGE closed
soon.   steve oldham

-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Ater [mailto:Jaa@aterwynne.com]
Sent: Saturday, July 08, 2000 1:02 PM
To: belliot@sppc.com; dponn@sppc.com; mruelle@sppc.com;
soldham@sppc.com; wpeterson@sppc.com
Subject: Important - Further Information

I have just learned informally from Mike Morgan that Enron is likely to take
the position that the 10AM version of Ruelle is not a best efforts
presentation.

To that end, please consider seriously the additions I have proposed in the
draft circulated about 12:45 today.

Also, please consider that with little additional effort (since the material
is already written), we could include almost everything we have drafted but
for the revised rate proposal.

It seems to me that there are two reasons for submitting as much as we can:
first, it helps play defense with Enron.   Second, it helps communicate with
the staff and the commission, and thus positions us for a positive outcome
in due course.


The notice should be given on Monday, the 20th  by 5:00 pm.

D

	From:  Mary Jo Johnson                           11/09/2000 10:12 AM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Driscoll Ranch #3 Gas pricing and interconnect estimate

Can you help me out on this Darren?   MJJ
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Jo Johnson/HOU/ECT on 11/09/2000
10:04 AM ---------------------------

"John Daugherty" <John.Daugherty@crosstx.com> on 11/08/2000 04:38:37 PM
To: <Mary.Jo.Johnson@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Re: Driscoll Ranch #3 Gas pricing and interconnect estimate

Mary Jo,

Thanks for the update.  Regarding the notice provision of 6 business days
prior to the close of business on the last business day of the month prior
to selected month,  does that mean we need to give you notice for December
by Tuesday, November 21st at 5:00 PM or Monday, November 20th at 5:00 PM
assuming the 23rd and 24th are holidays?

John Daugherty
----- Original Message -----
From: <Mary.Jo.Johnson@enron.com>
To: <John.Daugherty@crosstx.com>
Cc: <Mary.Jo.Johnson@enron.com>; <mrhoades@camdenresources.com>;
<rskinner@camdenresources.com>; <barry.davis@crosstx.com>;
<Jim.Wales@crosstx.com>; <Jill.T.Zivley@enron.com>;
<JoAnne.Harris@enron.com>; <Brian.M.Riley@enron.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 5:12 PM
Subject: Re: Driscoll Ranch #3 Gas pricing and interconnect estimate


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

November 2, 2001 5:00pm through November 5, 2001 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI:
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 11/2/2001 at  12:00:00 PM CT thru Sun 11/4/2001 at  4:00:00 AM CT
	Fri 11/2/2001 at  10:00:00 AM PT thru Sun 11/4/2001 at  2:00:00 AM PT
	Fri 11/2/2001 at  6:00:00 PM London thru Sun 11/4/2001 at  10:00:00 AM London
Outage:  EDI_QA Oracle database upgrade
Environments Impacted:  Corp
Purpose: To comply with corporate standardization
Backout: Restore the database to its original state
Contact(s): 	Maria Santiago  713-345-7354
		John Kratzer  713-345-7672
		Karen O'Grady  713-345-7149

EES:
Impact:  EES
Time:  Thu 11/1/2001 at  6:00:00 PM CT thru Sun 11/4/2001 at  12:00:00 AM CT
	Thu 11/1/2001 at  4:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 11/3/2001 at  10:00:00 PM PT
	Fri 11/2/2001 at  12:00:00 AM London thru Sun 11/4/2001 at  6:00:00 AM London
Outage:  Migrate EESHOU-FS1to SAN
Environments Impacted:  EES
Purpose: New Cluster server is on SAN and SAN backups
This will provide better performance, server redundancy, and backups should complete without problems.
Backout: Take new server offline,
Bring up old servers
change users profiles back to original settings.
Contact(s): 	Roderic H Gerlach    713-345-3077

ENRON CENTER SOUTH DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:
Impact:  Ardmore
Time:  Sat 11/3/2001 at  10:00:00 PM CT thru Sun 11/4/2001 at  2:00:00 AM CT
	Sat 11/3/2001 at    8:00:00 PM PT thru Sun 11/4/2001 at 12:00:00 AM PT
	Sun 11/4/2001 at  4:00:00 AM London thru Sun 11/4/2001 at  8:00:00 AM London
Outage:  Add redundant connections between ARD-COR-CCX1/2 and ENA-CX1/2-ARD
Environments Impacted:  All
Purpose: Increased bandwidth / resiliency available on the MAN
Backout: Put original equipment/configs back in place
Contact(s): 	Dennis McGough   713-345-3143

Impact:  EBS
Time:  Sat 11/3/2001 at    1:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 11/3/2001 at  4:00:00 PM CT
	Sat 11/3/2001 at  11:00:00 AM PT thru Sat 11/3/2001 at  2:00:00 PM PT
	Sat 11/3/2001 at  7:00:00 PM London thru Sat 11/3/2001 at  10:00:00 PM London
Outage:  Relocate EBS Portland servers and switch pdx-3wtcpl-swx1
Environments Impacted:  EBS
Purpose: Existing equipment rack removed in order to install new phone system.
Backout: None.  Space must be vacated.
Contact(s): 	Chris Shirkoff  503-778-0920  8774937918@skytel.com
		Dave Steiner  503-703-1553

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET: No Scheduled Outages.

MESSAGING:
Impact:  Corp Notes
Time:  Fri 11/2/2001 at  9:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 11/3/2001 at    1:00:00 AM CT
	Fri 11/2/2001 at  7:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 11/2/2001 at  11:00:00 PM PT
	Sat 11/3/2001 at  3:00:00 AM London thru Sat 11/3/2001 at  7:00:00 AM London
Outage:  cNotes Server Reboots
Environments Impacted:  All users on any of the mailservers listed below
Purpose: Scheduled @ 2 week interval
Backout: Make sure server comes up.
Contact(s): 	Trey Rhodes  (713) 345-7792

Impact:  EI
Time:   Fri 11/2/2001 at  9:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 11/3/2001 at    1:00:00 AM CT
	Fri 11/2/2001 at  7:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 11/2/2001 at  11:00:00 PM PT
	Sat 11/3/2001 at  3:00:00 AM London thru Sat 11/3/2001 at  7:00:00 AM London
Outage:  EI Notes Server Maintenance
Environments Impacted:  EI Local/Domestic/Foreign Sites
Purpose: Scheduled @ 2 week interval
Backout: N/A
Contact(s): 	David Ricafrente    713-646-7741

Impact:  EES
Time:  Fri 11/2/2001 at  8:30:00 PM CT thru Fri 11/2/2001 at  11:30:00 PM CT
	Fri 11/2/2001 at  6:30:00 PM PT thru Fri 11/2/2001 at    9:30:00 PM PT
	Sat 11/3/2001 at  2:30:00 AM London thru Sat 11/3/2001 at  5:30:00 AM London
Outage:  EES Notes Server Reboots
Environments Impacted:  All users on any of the mailservers listed below
Purpose: Scheduled @ 2 week interval on 1st and the 3rd Friday of each month.
Backout:
Contact(s): 	Dalak Malik    713-345-8219

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER:
Impact:
Time:  Sat 11/3/2001 at  9:00:00 PM CT thru Sun 11/4/2001 at  12:00:00 AM CT
	Sat 11/3/2001 at  7:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 11/3/2001 at  10:00:00 PM PT
	Sun 11/4/2001 at  3:00:00 AM London thru Sun 11/4/2001 at 6:00:00 AM London
Outage:  Migrate EBS Common Data to Corp Environment and update DFS
Environments Impacted:  Any user accessing o: EBS
Purpose: Will be migrating all common data from o: EBS Houston and o: EBS Portland to Corp servers in Houston and their corresponding EBS servers will be decommissioned. o: ebs shepherd and o: ebs loopcentral will also be migrated and their corresponding EBS servers will be decommissioned.  o: EBS will be removed from DFS and the DFS entries will be re-inputed in order to decommission the EBS DFS server.  This needs to be done as part of the decommissioning of the EBS environment.
Backout: Leave EBS data servers and DFS servers online and re-input the DFS links.
Contact(s): 	Mark Wolf    713-345-6389

Impact:  HR
Time:  Sat 11/3/2001 at  8:00:00 AM CT thru Sat 11/3/2001 at  11:00:00 AM CT
	Sat 11/3/2001 at  6:00:00 AM PT thru Sat 11/3/2001 at    9:00:00 AM PT
	Sat 11/3/2001 at  2:00:00 PM London thru Sat 11/3/2001 at  5:00:00 PM London
Outage:  Replace CD-ROM in HR-DB-5
Environments Impacted:  HR LAN
Purpose: The CD-ROM drive has failed and needs to be replaced.
Backout:
Contact(s): 	Brandon Bangerter   713-345-4904
		Mark Calkin               713-345-7831
		Raj Perubhatla         713-345-8016  281-788-9307

Impact:  nahou-rem2
Time:  Sun 11/4/2001 at    1:00:00 PM CT thru Sun 11/4/2001 at    1:30:00 PM CT
	Sun 11/4/2001 at  11:00:00 AM PT thru Sun 11/4/2001 at  11:30:00 AM PT
	Sun 11/4/2001 at  7:00:00 PM London thru Sun 11/4/2001 at  7:30:00 PM London
Outage:  Upgrade nahou-rem2 server with latest Remedy Patch
Environments Impacted:  Remedy Reporting Server
Purpose: Plug a memory leak in the current version patch.
Backout: Remove the new executable and rename the arserver.old to arserver.exe
Contact(s): 	James Weaver    713-345-4810

SITARA:  No Scheduled Outages.

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY: No Scheduled Outages

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:  No Scheduled Outages.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
								FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center

Specific Help:
Information Risk Management			(713) 853-5536
SAP/ISC                                                                               (713) 345-4727
Unify On-Call 					(713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call					(713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS			(713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP				(713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR						(713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support 					(713) 327-3893  [Pager]
EES Help Desk					(713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797
TDS -Trader Decision Support On-Call                    (713) 327-6032 [Pager]


Sounds to me like this guy is full of shit!.   As seems to be typical for
most of those retards that used to work for Wilshire.


Start Date: 10/18/01; HourAhead hour: 14;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.


Gerald,

Additional suggestions from one of my colleagues, Natalie Futch. (I asked her
for a blunt assessment. She complied.) Her version is better than mine.

Bill

Katz, Kutter Haigler, Alderman, Bryant & Yon et al
106 East College Avenue, Suite 1200
Tallahassee, FL  32301
(850) 224-9634
www.katzlaw.com
_______________________________________

This transmission is intended to be delivered only to the named addressee(s)
and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary, attorney
work-product or attorney-client privileged.  If this information is received
by anyone other than the named addressee(s), the recipient should immediately
notify the sender by E-MAIL and by telephone (850) 224-9634 and obtain
instructions as to the disposal of the transmitted material.  In no event
shall this material be read, used, copied, reproduced, stored or retained by
anyone other than the named addressee(s), except with the express consent of
the sender or the named addressee(s).  Thank you.

Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2001 15:04:57 -0400
From: "Natalie FUTCH" <natalief@katzlaw.com>
To: "Bill L. Bryant" <BILL@katzlaw.com>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Response to AEC letter
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_633898B2.C4A5CC38"

Bill -

Chris Hilger's letter appears confrontational and inflammatory. I'm sure that
the letter to which he is responding is similarly belligerent. However, if
Enron's goal is to avoid litigation and expense in this matter, this letter
does not work toward that goal.

Unless there is some strategic reason to respond with specific dates and
conversations, I think the only necessary sentences in paragraph one are one
and three. Only the first sentence, as amended, is necessary in paragraph
two. See my proposed revisions attached.

Natalie

>>> Bill L. Bryant 04/04/01 11:58AM >>>
here you go...

Katz, Kutter Haigler, Alderman, Bryant & Yon et al
106 East College Avenue, Suite 1200
Tallahassee, FL  32301
(850) 224-9634
www.katzlaw.com
_______________________________________

This transmission is intended to be delivered only to the named addressee(s)
and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary, attorney
work-product or attorney-client privileged.  If this information is received
by anyone other than the named addressee(s), the recipient should immediately
notify the sender by E-MAIL and by telephone (850) 224-9634 and obtain
instructions as to the disposal of the transmitted material.  In no event
shall this material be read, used, copied, reproduced, stored or retained by
anyone other than the named addressee(s), except with the express consent of
the sender or the named addressee(s).  Thank you.

 - Project Blackwater-AEC Response Letter (4.4.01)a.doc


Looks good. Thanks Lindy.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Donoho, Lindy
Sent:	Friday, February 15, 2002 11:49 AM
To:	Ratner, Michael
Cc:	Howard, Kevin A.; Geaccone, Tracy; Harris, Steven; Y'barbo, Paul
Subject:	Assumptions for 2010

This morning in our meeting, we discussed 3 cases to be run in the TW 2010 model.  I've summarized them in the attached spreadsheet so we can keep track of our variables.  I will be sending you additional info for the various cases.  Please call to discuss.

Thanks,
Lindy
36007

 << File: TW2010Assumptions.xls >>


Did you understand my message?  Please give me a call.  S


Looks good to me.  Are we certain that all of the other traders plan to post
daily volumes?

David Forster
10/08/99 09:51 AM
To: Elena Kapralova/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark E Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marcello Romano/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark
Dilworth/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Paper Volumes

That looks fine to me. Please ensure the Volume tab is consistent with this
description as well.

Mark: Please comment if you have any concerns.

Thanks,

Dave

Elena Kapralova
08/10/99 12:18
To: David Forster/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marcello Romano/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark
Dilworth/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Paper Volumes

the current paper descriptions says:

"....Seller pays a Floating Price and the Buyer pays the price submitted by
Counterparty on the website (the Fixed Price) in each case in respect of the
Notional Quantity per Determination Period.  Each calendar month during the
term of the Transaction will be a Determination Period. The Notional Quantity
per Determination Period is the volume submitted multiplied by the number
days in the relevant Determination Period."

suggestion:

"....Seller pays a Floating Price and the Buyer pays the price submitted by
Counterparty on the website (the Fixed Price) in each case in respect of the
Notional Quantity per Determination Period.  Each calendar month during the
term of the Transaction will be a Determination Period. The Notional Quantity
per Determination Period is the volume submitted by Counterparty on the
website."

If you all agree, I'll make this change in the BlackMaster. Dave, it may need
lawyers validation?

Elena

David Forster
08/10/99 00:35
To: Elena Kapralova/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Paper Volumes

---------------------- Forwarded by David Forster/LON/ECT on 08/10/99 00:35
---------------------------

Marcello Romano
07/10/99 21:50
To: David Forster/LON/ECT@ECT, Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Paper Volumes

Paper volumes are actually per month not per day in each determination
period. We need to change the long descriptions.

M


Yo Sweets McGeets.  Just a reminder that you were going to call and
discontinue your payroll deduction for the Enron fitness center.

	Let's talk insurance stuff tonight as I know you need to make those
elections soon.  Will plan on comparing and contrasting my health plan with
Enron's.  Luv, The Wif


I am pleased to announce the following organizational changes within EGM Operations & Accounting effective immediately:

Todd Hall will be relocating to London and will assume responsibility for all EGM operational activities in London including Risk Management, Confirmations, Coordination & Settlements and Trade Accounting.  Todd will be working closely with the EGM business unit heads in London to ensure their businesses are being supported in an effective and efficient manner.

Cindy Horn will assume the role of EGM IT & Remote Office Controller.  She will be responsible for the oversight and coordination of all IT projects affecting the Operations group.  Her duties will include monitoring and reporting project timelines and expenses and ensuring IT is being utilized in the most cost-effective manner within Operations.  Cindy will also manage the operational activities of the Singapore and Tokyo offices and coordinate with the Sydney office in regards to EGM operations.

Michelle Bruce will assume responsibility for Risk Management in the Houston office for Crude & Products, Coal and Weather.  She will also continue to manage the Confirmation, Coordination & Settlements and Trade Accounting functions in Houston.

Please join me in congratulating these individuals on their new assignments.


[Comnes, Alan];Asks for more data and sets a workshop on 7/24;
[Comnes, Alan];
;
Attached is an advance draft of a joint assigned Commissioners' ruling asking
parties to comment on DWR's revised revenue requirement by August 3, 2001,
asking for additional information from DWR, and setting a workshop for July
27, 2001 at 9:00 am at the Commission to discuss the revenue requirement
assumptions with representatives from DWR.

Due to computer difficulties, this ruling will be filed with the Docket
Office tomorrow, July 25.

<<joint ACR.doc>>

John S. Wong
CPUC - ALJ
(415) 703-3130


Stevens-

Destin does not feel comfortable with volumes yet at your meter.  They are
waiting for final meter numbers before allocating to our transport contract.
That should happen some time next week.  We will send you those numbers and
the prices once we receive the final allocation.

Thanks,

Susan Pereira

Stevens_Hollister@eott.com on 11/06/2000 08:18:31 AM
To: "Susan W Pereira" <Susan.W.Pereira@enron.com>
cc: Dan_Cole@eott.com
Subject: Gas Daily Prices for Bazor Ridge

Susan,

There was a small amount of gas sold from the Kahuna Gas plant in October.
I have spoken with Joe Casa with Enron and he is going to provide volumes.
Can you please provide me the October pricing or give me the name of
someone who can?

Thanks,

Stevens


Hi,

I'm interested in attending Rodney's retreat to Maui from Apr 1 - 10, 2002.

Are there spots open?  If so, can I send a check to reserve a spot?

Thanks,
Cooper


Jeff Westover said you want the demand charges split out by pipe.  I attached
September, is this the month you are looking for?


Your type of article!


On Dec. 21 CRC called and wanted to resume deliveries at the Mid-C (they are delivering to us).  I'm assuming this is OK.  Let me know otherwise.

Sean


Agent Guzman,
please excuse the falsified subject heading, it was a necessary measure to
ensure mission security.
Phase II has been completed: State-side
Will keep you informed as mission progresses.

Johnson

Get FREE Email/Voicemail with 15MB at Lycos Communications at
http://comm.lycos.com


You are cordially invited to attend an overview session provided by the ENA
Human Resource department regarding the Performance Evaluation Process
(PEP).  Employees who have not attended any previous PEP training or new
managers are strongly encouraged to attend this session.  However, all are
invited to attend.

What:   Overview of the Performance Evaluation Process
When:  Monday, October 30, 2000
   12:00-1:30 p.m. or 3:00 - 4:30 p.m.
   OR
   Tuesday, October 31, 2000
   10:00-11:30 a.m. or 12:00-1:30 p.m.
Where:  Doubletree (next to 2 Allen Center),  De Zavala Conference Room
Available seating: 50  per session
Bring your lunch. Drinks  and cookies will be provided.
If you are unable to attend, there will be a Technical and a Process guide
available through the web base site http://pep.corp.enron.com.  Also, there
is a PEP Help Desk hotline of (713)853-4777 option 4 should you have any
questions during the evaluation process.


How are you doing.  Jeb tells me you're going to burn with the building.  What is going on with UBS?


Greetings:

The governor will be holding a press conference and availability at 4:00
today to supposedly discuss the QF and Blackouts issues.  There are no
written documents or available materials at this time.  We do understand
that it will be satellite unlinked so there is a chance some stations may
carry it live.  If you have access to the Internet or squawk box you can
listen into room 1190- no guarantee they will be airing the press
conference.

This is all based or rumor and research and the Governor's office has not
confirmed anything.

In the event there is a press conference IEP will be orchestrating a
response immediately.

We will keep you posted.

Katie Kaplan
Manager of State Policy Affairs
Independent Energy Producers Association
(916) 448-9499


------------
From:	Enron Announcements/Corp/Enron@ENRON [IMCEANOTES-Enron+20Announcements_Corp_Enron+40ENRON@ENRON.com] on behalf of iPayit@enron.com [IMCEANOTES-iPayit+40enron+2Ecom@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Monday, August 27, 2001 12:45 AM
To:	IBuyIt Payables User List@ENRON
Cc:	Gillespie, John; Roberts, Angela; Wood, Ron; Childress, Matthew; Lenig, Chris; Wasaff, George; Causey, Richard; ibuyit; Wood, Ron; Cuccia, Joe; Davila, Raul; McAdams, Sally; Desbiens, Michael
Subject:	Moved, New, and Improved!

Payables

Effective today, the responsibility for Accounts Payables has been moved to Global Strategic Sourcing under the leadership of George Wasaff.  He, along with the Accounts Payable team, is pleased to announce a number of system enhancements based on your valuable feedback.

Delegation of Authority
iPayit now enables you to identify a delegate to code, review, or approve invoices on your behalf.  The system provides you with the flexibility to:
*  Identify a delegate as a coder, approver, or reviewer
*  Define the length of time that you would like to delegate your authority
*  Select whether the delegate will assume your approval amount, maintain their own approval amount, or assume a specific approval amount

Incorrect Company Code
Incorrect company code?  No problem!  The invoice will no longer return to Accounts Payable for correction before you are able to code the invoice.  iPayit enables you to select the correct company code and continue coding.

Additional Enhancements
*  In addition to Quick Forward, you can now Quick Approve invoices
*  Invoice comments can now be easily viewed from your in-box

Introducing iPayit
With so many new systems, you told us that it was easy to confuse Payables with iBuyit eProcurement.  To help clear up that confusion, we are pleased to announce that this new and improved version has a new name:  iPayit.
*  To access iPayit, visit the iBuyit Portal or http://iPayit.enron.com.
*  Look for e-mail notifications from <mailto:ipayit@enron.com>.

Sneak Peak
For a preview of the enhancements and how to use them, click on the link below:
http://home.enron.com:84/messaging/ipayitsyspres.ppt

This is just the beginning!  We have created a committee that is dedicated to improving the Accounts Payable process.  We hope to engage you in this effort and plan to actively seek your involvement and input.  We look forward to working with and hearing from you about future enhancements that will enable iPayit to play a valuable role in your invoice payment activities.

For invoice payment status please call the AP Call Center at (713) 853-7127 or toll free  (866) AP ENRON, or send an e-mail to <mailto:ipayit@enron.com>.


Louise,

Attachment as per your conversation with Rob Milnthorp.

ENRON CANADA CORP.

Derek J. Davies
Vice President


I'll be in D.C. Can't wait to see you.

Best,
Jeff

Susan M Landwehr
09/01/2000 10:19 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re:

All is well here.  It did take me awhile to recover....but am feeling great
now and looking forward to a few days off next week.  We had a meeting in
Houston that got cancelled, so I decided to take vacation.

I'm sorry that you didn't make it to LA for the convention.  We had some fun,
and it would have been great to see you.  Are you going to be in D.C. on the
13th?  I have to be in Chicago for meetings on the 12th and don't get into
D.C. until late.

See you soon.

Jeff Dasovich
08/31/2000 03:23 PM
To: Susan M Landwehr/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject:

Man, Illinois is tough.  One has to submit testimony to get certified!  How
are things going?  Got your voice mail.  Hope all's well.  Recovered yet from
the conventions?


TO:ALL NYMEX DIVISION MEMBERS AND MEMBER FIRMS
ALL COMEX DIVISION MEMBERS AND MEMBER FIRMS

FROM:Neal Wolkoff, Executive Vice President

SUBJECT:Approved Amendment to the NYMEX Platinum and Palladium Futures
Contracts to Add Brink,s Inc. as an Exchange Licensed Depository.

The Exchange has received approval from the Commodity Futures Trading
Commission to amend Supplement No. 1 of the NYMEX Platinum and Palladium
Futures Contracts to add the Brink,s Inc. vault facility located at 652 Kent
Avenue, Brooklyn, New York as a Licensed Depository for the storage of
platinum and palladium deliverable against the Exchange,s Platinum and
Palladium Futures Contracts.  Brink,s Inc,s charges for platinum and
palladium are attached.

The approved amendment is effective October 1, 2000.

Copies of the approved amendment are attached.  CAPITAL LETTERS indicate
additions, bracketing [ ] indicates deletions.

Should you have any questions regarding the above, please contact Albert J.
Getz at 212-299-2608.
Approved Rule Amendment
CAPITAL LETTERS indicate additions; [ ] indicates deletions.

PALLADIUM FUTURES CONTRACT

Supplement No. 1

OFFICIAL LIST OF APPROVED DEPOSITORIES

Depository      Facility at

NEW YORK

ScotiaMocatta Depository,    4 World Trade Center
A Division of The Bank of    New York, NY 10048
ova Scotia      212-912-8530
HSBC Bank USA      1 West 39th Street
       New York, NY 10018
       212-525-6439
BRINK,S INC.      652 KENT AVENUE
       BROOKLYN, NY  11211
       718-260-2200

DELAWARE

Delaware Depository Service Company, LLC  3601 North Market Street
       Wilmington, DE 19802
       302-765-3889

Approved Rule Amendment
CAPITAL LETTERS indicate additions; [ ] indicates deletions.

PLATINUM FUTURES CONTRACT

Supplement No. 1

OFFICIAL LIST OF APPROVED DEPOSITORIES

Depository     Facility at

NEW YORK

ScotiaMocatta Depository,   4 World Trade Center
A Division of The Bank of   New York, NY 10048
Nova Scotia     212-912-8530

HSBC Bank USA     1 West 39th Street
      New York, NY 10018
      212-525-6439

BRINK,S INC.     652 KENT AVENUE
      BROOKLYN, NY  11211
      718-260-2200

DELAWARE

Delaware Depository Service Company, LLC 3601 North Market Street
      Wilmington, DE 19802
      302-765-3889

BRINKS Incorporated
652 Kent Avenue
Brooklyn, New York 11211

PRECIOUS METALS EXCHANGE RATES

Contract Weight   Monthly Charge   Out Charge
5,000 T.O. Silver   $18.50    $65.00
  100 T.O. Gold           $ 7.00    $15.00
   50 T.O. Platinum    $7.00    $15.00
  100 T.O. Palladium  $  7.00    $15.00

Contract Weight   Weighing Charge
5,000 T.O. Silver  $5.00
  100 T.O. Gold   $2.00
   50 T.O. Platinum  $1.00
   00 T.O. Palladium  $2.00

 There is no delivery in charge for any Exchange Registered metal.
 There is no charge to issue a contract for an Exchange warrant.
 There is a $5.00 replacement charge for each warrant.
 There is no internal vault charge when transferring metal from
Non-Exchange to Exchange.
 Standard Exchange Contract out charges will be assessed when
transferring metal off an Exchange to Non-Exchange.

OTHER SERVICES

 Pallet strapping - $10.00 per pallet
 Brink,s Global Services Domestic Network*
 Brink,s Global Services International Network*
 Brink,s Tractor Trailer Services*

 Please call 1-800-5 BRINKS for rates and destinations.

Should you have any questions regarding the above, pleasecontact Albert J.
Getz at 212-299-2608.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=tana.jones@enron.com&refdo
c=(00-327)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


I'm thrilled - see you in Newport (when do you get in?)


Gentlemen:

I have been advised by J. Nassos that Peoples (through WestLB) will be
exercising the ABB option today. I have asked that they send me a copy of the
notice of exercise of option, and I left Mike Sandridge a voice mail telling
him to expect it this afternoon.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Kay


Ricky sent me the nom early - 87,000 for the weekend.

my new number 713-571-3258

Thanks- Julie


The attached name changes were made in the Counterparty system last night,
May 3.  I am unable to attach the regular report to an email message because
of it's size.  I am working to remedy that situation, and I will notify you
once it has been resolved.

Short name changes will be coordinated with ERMS IT tomorrow, May 4.

Please call me with any questions or concerns.

Thanks,

Cheryl x33103


I agree 400% - I look forward to your plan.
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 08/04/2000
04:38 PM ---------------------------

James D Steffes@EES
08/04/2000 03:13 PM
To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard
Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J
Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: SDG&E Complaint vs. Sellers into Calif ISO / Calif PX

SDG&E filed a Complaint with the FERC that requests an "emergency order
capping at $250 per MWh the prices" for all parties selling into the Calif
ISO and the Calif PX.   SDG&E claims that the Calif ISO and the Calif PX are
"fundamentally flawed and inherently incapable of producing workable
competition".

EPMI is directly impacted by this Complaint.   Even though FERC has approved
EPMI's Market-Based Rate certificate after a finding that we had no market
power, this Complaint would restrict us from selling at above $250 per MWh
into the Calif ISO and Calif PX.

Government Affairs is responding in two ways --

1. A direct response from EPMI to FERC responding that there has been no
finding that EPMI has market power and therefore we should not lose our
market-based rate authority.

2. A response through WPTF (Western Power Trading Forum) and EPSA to argue
more broadly the facts of what is going on in California (bad hedging by
SDG&E) and poor market structure rules.

The fundamental problem is that the FERC is running scared about price spikes
and may, without any real thinking, approve such a Complaint.  SDG&E has
asked for expedited treatment and a decision could be out as early as mid
August.

This issue again highlights how important the on-going FERC Investigation in
Market Issues is for Enron.  We are putting together a detailed plan of how
Enron will present our recommendations to FERC in this Investigation and will
discuss this with you.

Call with questions.

Thanks,

Jim


Steve,
I'm not sure this is on point, but perhaps some parallels can be drawn.  In
between working at the PUCO, Kerry worked at NRRI.  He  has a call in to them
on this issue and will respond to you directly since I will be travelling
this afternoon.
Janine
---------------------- Forwarded by Janine Migden/DUB/EES on 10/02/2000 09:16
AM ---------------------------

Roy Boston
10/02/2000 09:10 AM
To: Janine Migden/DUB/EES@EES
cc: Kerry Stroup/DUB/EES@EES
Subject: Re: examples of auction processes that worked

Janine -- I do not have a good example of this for electricity but in the gas
industry the manner in which FERC allowed existing LDC customers of
interstate pipelines to retain the capacity they needed while permitting
unneeded capacity to be bid out may be helpful.  Several parallels are
manifest between the two industries: 1) they are both wholesale markets ; 2)
cpacity contracts can be long-dated (exceed 10 years in some instances); 3)
LDCs were able to retain capacity on a evergreen basis; 4)temporarily unused
capacity became released in to the secondary market and was available for
recall upon terms imposed by the releasing entity; and 5) this mechanism
amounted to an auction with a "max rate" ceiling but resulted in reliable
wholesale servioce to those who needed it the most.  We may not want to use
this example because it did not represent a true dutch auction scenario that
would permit us to maximize the benefit of long-dated contracts.  However,
the gas industry may provide some example of how bidding can effectively
reallocate scarce resources over numerous competing interests and result in a
reliable system that provides wholesale capacity growth.

Janine Migden
09/29/2000 03:57 PM
To: Kerry Stroup/DUB/EES@EES, Roy Boston/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: examples of auction processes that worked

Any ideas?  the only thing that strikes me is when some regulators proposed
competitive bidding of wholesale power as a precursor to retail access.
---------------------- Forwarded by Janine Migden/DUB/EES on 09/29/2000 03:54
PM ---------------------------
From: Steven J Kean@ENRON on 09/29/2000 03:47 PM
Sent by: Steven J Kean@ENRON
To: Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT, Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert
Hemstock/CAL/ECT@ECT, Peter Styles/LON/ECT@ECT, Daniel
Allegretti/HOU/EES@EES, Steve Montovano/DUB/EES@EES, Janine
Migden/DUB/EES@EES, Aleck Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT, Paul Dawson/Govt.
Affairs/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: examples of auction processes that worked

Jeff Skilling proposed a solution to Gov Davis to solve the supply and
pricing problems in the California market.  In summary, the proposal would
have a neutral party conduct an auction wherein the utilities would seek bids
for 5-10 year packages of power from suppliers.  The gov asked if anyone had
successfully conducted such an auction in the industry already.

I need your help to identify and describe any such examples (European or
North American) by mid day Monday. Jeff and I will have a follow up call with
the governor on Monday.

Thanks


Dear Power Outage Database Customer,

Attached you will find an excel document. The outages contained within
are forced or
rescheduled outages. Your daily delivery will still contain
these outages.

In addition to the two excel documents, there is a dbf file that is
formatted like
your daily deliveries you receive nightly. This will enable
you to load the data into your regular database. Any questions please
let me know.
Thanks.

Greg Elliott
IIR, Inc.
713-783-5147 x 3481
outages@industrialinfo.com

THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL IS LEGALLY PRIVILEGED AND
CONFIDENTIAL
INFORMATION INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED
ABOVE.  YOU
ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR
COPY OF THIS E-MAIL TO UNAUTHORIZED ENTITIES IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF
YOU HAVE
RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL IN ERROR, PLEASE DELETE IT.

 - 010402U.xls
 - 010402R.xls


Mieco 471


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Lebrocq, Wendi
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 9:55 AM
To:	Bradford, William S.; Lees, Lisa; Fayett, Juana; Le, Trang; Maley, Paul; O'day, Karen; Rohauer, Tanya; Lombardi, Kelly; Lindsay, Brian; EOL Call Center; Hare, Bill D.; Heffernan, Amy; Lafuze, Molly; Clark, Danny; Panus, Stephanie; Mandola, Teresa; Ebow, Amber; Coleman, Tandra; Campbell, Lesli; Lebrocq, Wendi; Taylor, Mark E (Legal); Lauer, Kara; Banner, Kimberly; Mcquade, Jennifer; George, Fraisy; Guillory, Michael; Rajaram, Aparna; Monterrey, Maribel; Lebeau, Maria; Escamilla, Albert; Lebrocq, Wendi; Global Emerging Businesses; Lambert, Karen; Jones, Tana; Schott, Samuel; Brackett, Debbie R.; Clark, Cynthia; Enron Europe Global CounterParty,; Sever, Stephanie; Moran, Tom; Clark, Claudia; Curry, Ken
Subject:	EOL and Clickpaper Approvals for 10-26-01

Please see attached.

Regards,

Wendi Lebrocq
3-3835


THIS MIGHT NOT WORK IN THE IDC, BUT IT IS A REQUIREMENT FOR THE WSCC. CAN WE MAKE THIS WORK TO ACCOMPLISH ALL OF OUR REQUIREMENTS?

Don Lacen
Public Service Company of New Mexico
Transmission Services Coordinator
Alvarado Square, MS EP11
Albuquerque, NM, 87158
505-241-2032
dlacen@pnm.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Cummings [<mailto:Bob.Cummings@nerc.net>]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 8:03 AM
To: OASIS Scheduling Collaborative
Cc: Interchange Subcommittee; Interchange Distribution Calculator
Working Group
Subject: RE: E-Tag 1.7 Issues

Dear OSCers,

Doing away with the path, or even not keeping it serial within the 1.7
tags is unacceptable because it will not work with the IDC.

Sure you could program the IDC to reconstruct the path, but the
processing time then becomes a performance issue for the IDC. That is
not acceptable...ALL tags in the EI go to the IDC, so it becomes a real
processing problem.

Remember these things work as a single system! E-Tag 1.7 will NOT be
implemented without working properly with the IDC...they are
interdependent.

-----Original Message-----
From: JPalin@pwrteam.com [<mailto:JPalin@pwrteam.com>]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 10:31 AM
To: Hagge, Jerry W.
Cc: Interchange Subcommittee; OASIS Scheduling Collaborative;
owner-interchange@nerc.com
Subject: Re: E-Tag 1.7 Issues

Jerry,

  I also do not recall any discussion regarding doing away with the path
on
ETag 1.7.  I would be interested in knowing how the TISWG and the IS
would
be unaware of this issue if in fact there is a push to elliminate paths.

Thoughts?
Julie

************************************************************************
**********************
This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Exelon Generation
Company
proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject
to copyright
belonging to the Exelon family of Companies.  This E-mail is intended
solely for
the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  If you
are not the
intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination,
distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of
and
attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
If you have
received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and
permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any
printout.

Thank You.
************************************************************************
*********************


Attached are redlined and clean CSA and Gas side agreement.  Please review.
I am going to make further refinements over the weekend before we send to
Drew.


I had a great weekend. I spent most of it in bed reading. The weather is
still crappy here. Hope you had a great weekend too.

 - pyramids.jpg
 - hippostyle hall.jpg
 - Bruce & I at Nefertiti temple, Abu Simbel.jpg


Unless the Easter weekend brings about the resurrection of this bill, de reg
is dead in Iowa for the 2000 session.  The House and Senate leadership
announced today that they would not bring the bill up for a vote this year.
The session is going to recess tonight for the holiday, they will reconvene
on Monday, and most likely now adjourn on Wednesday.

I am certainly disappointed that our efforts were not successful--especially
in light of our being part of a very diverse coalition in support of the bill
that included the coops, munis, Mid American, Alliant, industrial customers,
school boards, low income providers,retailers, grocers, etc.
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan M Landwehr/HOU/EES on 04/16/2000
09:33 PM ---------------------------

Susan M Landwehr
04/14/2000 06:15 PM
To: Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES, Janine
Migden/DUB/EES@EES, Becky L Merola/DUB/EES@EES, Mark Harada/HOU/EES@EES,
Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Buranit Suttabustya/HOU/EES@EES, Richard D
Rathvon/HOU/EES@EES, Barton Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Moore/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen Plauche/Corp/Enron@Enron, Fred
Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Daniel Reck/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lon Stanton/ET&S/Enron, Barbara A
Hueter/DUB/EES@EES, Roy Boston/HOU/EES@EES, Kerry Stroup/DUB/EES@EES, Dave
Mangskau/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Thomas S Reichelderfer/DUB/EES@EES, Steven J
Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Elizabeth Linnell/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Iowa de reg update

A wild week in Iowa.  By the end of the day Tuesday, it became clear to all
parties that the bill would not be called for a vote.  The customers were
unwilling to give anymore on the enviroment issues and the democrats would
similarly not back off their positions.  Mid American then switched gears to
pull out all the stops on getting labor support in order to trump the enviro
supporters.  Mid American put forward a proposal to the unions/legislators
that they would commit to build 2 power plants in the state of Iowa (as
opposed to developing in Illinois) over the next 5 years that would employ
union labor. Mid American also had it's top management making many visits
this week---Greg Abel and I believe also David Sokol.  (No Warren Buffet
sightings yet!!!!)This offer created a flurry of activity on both sides, but
at the end of the day Thursday, the state IBEW group let it be known that
they would still not support the bill even with the Mid Am proposal.

Mid American believes that the Republicans now have a hook to force the
democrats into voting for the de reg bill, by saying that if they don't vote
affirmative, they are not for economic development in the rural/struggling
areas of the state where the power plants would be built.

WHile I may not share Mid American's positive assessment, the proponent's
group continues it's advocacy and will meet with legilsators in their
districts over the weekend. The senate leadership agreed to hold off
reconvening the committee until Monday afternoon in an effort to allow any
last minute maneuvering over the week end.
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan M Landwehr/HOU/EES on 04/14/2000
05:43 PM ---------------------------

Susan M Landwehr
04/10/2000 11:15 PM
To: Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES, Janine
Migden/DUB/EES@EES, Becky L Merola/DUB/EES@EES, Mark Harada/HOU/EES@EES,
Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Ajit Gill/HOU/EES@EES, Richard D
Rathvon/HOU/EES@EES, Barton Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Moore/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen Plauche/Corp/Enron@Enron, Fred
Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Daniel Reck/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lon Stanton/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Barbara A
Hueter/DUB/EES@EES, Roy Boston/HOU/EES@EES, Kerry Stroup/DUB/EES@EES,
dmangsk@enron.com, Thomas S Reichelderfer/DUB/EES@EES, Steven J
Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Elizabeth Linnell/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Iowa de reg update

The latest from Des Moines.  The chair(republican) of the Senate committee
had a hearing this morning to consider all of the enviromental amendments put
forward by the Democrats and it was clear that no Dems would vote for the
eventual bill without their amendments, so the chair recessed the committee
without a vote.  The committee can be recalled at any time, but the general
sense is that it will not be brought back up without at least 2 democrat
votes guaranteed.  As is often the case in these debates, the proponents
continue to try many strategies, but all of us agree that without direct
intervention from Governor Vilsack, the democrats will not come around. As
stated in my earlier message, I am not optimistic about passage.  Tempers are
running very high and it is very possible that the utilities will try to cut
a deal at the last minute that will negatively impact the customers (likely
by rate impacts on envriomental/efficiency programs).  Please give me a call
#612-339-4599 if you want any added insight.

---------------------- Forwarded by Susan M Landwehr/HOU/EES on 04/10/2000
10:47 PM ---------------------------

Susan M Landwehr
04/05/2000 12:24 PM
To: Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES, Janine
Migden/DUB/EES@EES, Becky L Merola/DUB/EES@EES, Mark Harada/HOU/EES@EES,
Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Ajit Gill/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Richard D Rathvon/HOU/EES@EES, Barton Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Moore/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen
Plauche/Corp/Enron@Enron, Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janel Guerrero/HOU/EES@EES,
Daniel Reck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lon
Stanton/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Barbara A Hueter/DUB/EES@EES, Roy
Boston/HOU/EES@EES, Kerry Stroup/DUB/EES@EES, dmangsk@enron.com, Thomas S
Reichelderfer/DUB/EES@EES
Subject: Iowa de reg update

The Iowa customer choice bill has run into some significant roadblacks the
last few days due to the political maneuvering of the Democrats.  As you will
recall, the House Republicans have always stated that they needed Democrat
votes in order to bring the matter to the floor for a vote.  Despite Governor
Vilsack's stated support for the measure last week as well as last weekend,
the House  Democrat leadership is unwilling to push their members, as they
want to use this bill against the Republicans in the House races this fall.
(The tactic they will take is that residential rates will rise in the
Southeastern part of the state due to the Republicans passing the bill).

The primary issue that the Dems are using as a reason not to vote for the
bill is that the enviromental protections/funds are not high enough.  The
Republicans are unhappy about the exhorbitant amount of funds and the RPS
that are already in the bill, and are not willing to vote for an amended bill
that the Dems are pushing for.  The enviros and the unions are, as they have
been for the last 6 months, the dividing force in this debate.

Therefore, the proponents coalition moved their efforts to the Senate, with
the hope of getting a vote out this week and then move it back over to the
HOuse.  While we had a good commitment from Senate leadership (both Dems and
Republicans) on Monday, that support has eroded as of this morning.  We are
trying a number of tactics, and hope that there will be some positive
movement today and tomorrow.  Without the Governor stepping up to the plate
and "encouraging" the democrats to gather the number of democrat votes
neccessary this week, I am not optimistic about passage.

There are still two-three weeks of session left, so this debate could rage
until then, but my sense is that if we don't get something out of the Senate
by the end of this week or early next week, we'll be dead.  Call if you have
any questions.
#612-339-4599


Please find attached the latest Q&A document which incorporates the comments
that Karen Denne received by 1:00 p.m. EST today.


Here is my updated status memo.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


I think these were intended for you.

---------------------- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 09/16/99 03:35 PM
---------------------------

"Yates, Terry" <TYates@velaw.com> on 09/16/99 11:00:19 AM
To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Indemnity Agreement

Attached are copies in Word and WordPerfect of:
1. The Enron Corp. Indemnity:
  <<ENR-IND.DOC>>  <<ENR-IND.WPD>>
2. The Hanover Compressor Company Indemnity:
  <<HAN-IND.DOC>>  <<HAN-IND.WPD>>

Diane R. Price
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.
Business & International
Phone:  (713) 758-1079
Fax:     ( 713) 615-5519
E-Mail: dprice@velaw.com

 - ENR-IND.DOC
 - ENR-IND.WPD
 - HAN-IND.DOC
 - HAN-IND.WPD


Lloyd,

I think that we can arrange a few video conference meetings instead.
I don't see a  justification for extending the stay over the weekend if we
have an alternative solution.

Vince

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp. - Europe

	From:  Lloyd Fleming                           07/06/2000 12:37 PM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Maureen Raymond/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject:

Vince

I met Maureen yesterday and had a useful discussion on her role within
Enron.  I think it would be very helpful to promote the Research group
function of the company, particularly given Maureen's background,  if she
could be introduced to some of the main traders down at MG.  Unfortunately
she won't have time to meet with MG unless we can schedule some meetings on
Monday.

Would you be happy for her to extend her stay here till Monday to allow the
meetings to take place?

Regards


Please take a look at these prior to us getting together.
Thanks,
Andy
---------------------- Forwarded by Andy Zipper/Corp/Enron on 06/16/2000
10:43 AM ---------------------------

Andy Zipper
06/15/2000 04:29 PM
To: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Posting agreement

Louise,
Please review and add comments on the following. I'd like to get your opinion
on the language prior to sending to the lawyers etc. etc.
Thanks.
-andy


Greetings!

  Today's EarthSat 6-10 and 11-15 maps:

Possible EarthSat's 6-10 for tomorrow:

Sunday Video Briefing is located in the Afternoon Video link on Research and Gas Fundamentals
Web Pages.

Jose Marquez


The $1.7M is in Jim's book.  He asked me to hold it back because he thought
the curve for ChiGate was set too high and he was making too much on Friday.
I think the $ is real, and it will be released before year end.

I don't know about the annuity.  Kevin will return tomorrow and he will have
to follow up with you.  I'll send the prior day P&L's tonight.

DG

From: Richard Tomaski@ENRON on 12/27/2000 03:49 PM
To: Kevin Radous, Darron Giron
cc:
Subject: top-leveled P&L

Can you guys confirm that we have $1.7 million top-leveled to allow for the
NGPL ITS losses that we have not put into the books yets?  We need to put
these losses in on Thursday or friday.

Also did we reverse the $326000 annuity and subsequent origination out of my
bookes and the FT-cental books?  We should have a new annuity to PGL for the
same amount.

Can you send me a copy of the top page for enovate for last Friday and
Thursday like the one you sent me today for Monday's top page?

Call me if you have any questions at 312.925.8906

Richard


We are long and short varying mws under different desks tomorrow at different
prices...  All deals need to be made per instructions.

First:
ST-CALI
We are short 100 mws for HE 7 in SP-15 at $220.  Please make the Enpower as a
buy from counterparty under ST-Cali.  We will then need to zero out a
imbalance purchase under ST-Cali and then zero out the short in ST-Cali in
SP-15 in CAPS.
We are long 25 mws for HE 7-22 in NP-15 at $290.  We can move this out using
Turlock, Modesto or Dynegy.  The account numbers are in the sheet.  The
newest account is Turlock to SNPD #790617.  All deals need to be under
ST-CALI.  Again we need to zero out the imbalance sale, so that we are flat.

WEST SERVICES
We are short 8 mws in SP-15 for HE 7-22 at $171.  The service desk has put in
a purchase from the imbalance (Enpower #579037).  We need to zero this out,
make a purchase from a counterparty under our book (ST-Whourly), then make a
sale to the services book in SP-15.

ST_WBOM
We are long 20 mws at MEAD 230 from the services desk tomorrow HE 11-16.  We
need to submit the transmission request to NEVP(services has already made the
enpower), then we need to either input the power and use NCPA to run it
across the path or sell it outright.  We are long at $150.  The Epmicalpoos
and the sales need to be under ST-WBOM.

Any questions...please give me a call.  503-887-3449.

Thanks in advance.
Bill


---------------------- Forwarded by Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT on 12/01/2000 01:46
PM ---------------------------
   Michele Winckowski @ ENRON                11/28/2000 04:47 PM

To: Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fwd: FW: Run off or Dance off?

This is the only answer -- specifically for us "sad" individuals.  Love ya -
MW

>
> (See attached file: danceoff.exe) <<danceoff.exe>>

 - danceoff.exe


Below is a summary of the PNR activity on TW  this month............

Buyer		PO#	POI		Dekatherm 	Rate/Dth 	Rate_Type	Invoice Amount
PNM		27267	500617	 	49,000 	 	$0.0800 	 $0.0800 	Total	 $3,920.00
USGT		27268	500622	 	15,199 	 	$0.0400 	 $0.0400 	Daily	 $607.96
USGT		27268	500622	 	328 	 	$0.0500 	 $0.0500 	Total	 $16.40
Calpine Energy	27507	78151	 	10,000 	 	$0.3883 	 $0.7766 	Daily	 $7,766.00

TOTALS				74,199 				 			$12,310.36

Note: USGT balance is 328 Dth owed to TW and is a part of the 15,199 Dth borrowed on Jan. 17th. The rate on this transaction is $0.04 per day not to exceed a Total rate of $0.09 per Dth.

If you have any questions, please call me.


Same as below with the following exceptions

Pipeline CGAS
Contract 64031
Firmness IT
Service Type Park & Loan
Rate  PAL
Term Type Term
Eff Date  1/1/2000 - 1/31/2000  Evergreen

Pipeline CGAS
Contract 64041
Firmness IT
Service Type Park & Loan
Rate  PAL
Term Type Term
Eff Date  1/1/2000 - 1/31/2000  Evergreen

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 01/19/2000 08:06
AM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
01/18/2000 07:08 PM
To: Sylvia A Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda H Fletcher/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: CGAS Pals agreements

Please set up the following CGAS contracts.  Please note; ENA is agent for CES

Pipeline CGAS
Contract 64031
Firmness IT
Service Type Storage Service
Rate  ISS
Term Type Term
Eff Date  1/1/2000 - 1/31/2000  Evergreen

Pipeline CGAS
Contract 64041
Firmness IT
Service Type Storage Service
Rate  ISS
Term Type Term
Eff Date  1/1/2000 - 1/31/2000  Evergreen


http://www.potterybarn.com/cat/pip.cfm?grp=151094&src=schfname%20ion%20nLexi
ngton%20rdes


Steffes		50/50
Nicolay			25/25

Louise Kitchen
Chief Operating Officer
Enron Americas
Tel:  713 853 3488
Fax: 713 646 2308


Dynegydirect will be unavailable beginning at 5:00pm today for system
maintenance.  We request that you please log out of the system while we are
performing maintenance.  Dynegydirect will be available tomorrow, October
23, during normal business hours starting at 2:00am until 6:30pm. Should
you have questions, please contact eCare at 713.767.5000 or 1.877.396.3493.

Dynegydirect  e-Care
Dynegy Inc.
1000 Louisiana, Suite 5800
Houston, Texas 77002

E-mail:
e-care@dynegydirect.com

Phone:
North America 877.396.3493
United Kingdom 0800.169.6591
International  +1.713.767.5000

Fax:
North America 877.396.3492
United Kingdom 0800.169.6615
International  +1.713.388.6002


I am open that week.  How about Tuesday?

From:	Richard B Sanders/Enron@enronXgate on 11/20/2001 08:24 AM
To:	William Frederking/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject:	RE: lunch

I am going to Las Vegas for Thanksgiving, but am available any day but Monday next week. Let me know your schedule.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Frederking, William
Sent:	Friday, November 16, 2001 1:57 PM
To:	Sanders, Richard B.
Subject:	lunch

Are you available for lunch next week?

Will


damn I knew, those freakin floor techs they know nothing (j/k, I like Pablo, I used to work with him at PG&E)

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Villarreal, Alexandra
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 5:26 PM
To:	Griffith, John
Subject:	RE:

no it does not work

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Griffith, John
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 5:25 PM
To:	Villarreal, Alexandra
Subject:

This is a test, I got a new computer and I am testing it, does it work?


CGoering@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:

The NYISO is reserving hours beginning 8:00 - 10:00 and 17:00 - 19:00 in
the September 24, 2001 Real-Time Market as well as the following hours per
ECA 20010908B to verify prices:

HQ:  3:00-5:00, 6:00-8:00, 12:00, and 19:00
NE:  6:00-8:00, 12:00, and 19:00
OH:  6:00-8:00, 12:00, and 19:00
PJM: 0:00-8:00, 12:00, and 19:00

Prices in the September 25, 2001 Day-Ahead Market are correct.

This e-mail information is a copy of the official posting which can be
found at the following address of our website:
http://mis.nyiso.com/public/htm/OperMessages/CurrentOperMessages.htm#mm


You're booked in Mt. Bachelor from 9:30 to 11 a.m. on Tuesday. I'll swing by
Starbucks in the morning and pick up a variety of bagels and cream cheese for
six people. We'll get a pot of coffee in there and you should be set. Let me
know if there's anything else I can do.

Kate


Hi everyone,

Here is a new ISDA request for USG Corp. If you have any questions, please
feel free to call.

Regards,

Brad


The time is right in the middle of trading on an AGA day.   Therefore, it is unlikely that anyone managing a stack will be able to attend.   I would suggest having Tom May and/or Lloyd attend.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Forster, David
Sent:	Tuesday, October 30, 2001 9:59 AM
To:	Kroll, Heather; Tricoli, Carl; Davis, Dana; Sturm, Fletcher J.; Presto, Kevin M.
Subject:	PowerEx

PowerEx will be coming to Houston and would like to meet us on Nov. 7 9:00-11:00.

They are the marketing and trading sub of BC Hydro and have dealt before with our Calgary and Portland offices. They are now opening an office in Toronto and wish to transact more in MAPP, NEPOOL, PJM and SPP. The purpose of their visit is an informal meet n' greet to establish contact with people at Enron.

They will be coming with their Head of Origination and Head of Trading.

Please let me know if you or someone from your group would like to attend.

Thanks,

Dave


FYI

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	greetings@reply.yahoo.com@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, October 08, 2001 7:36 PM
To:	Thompson, Debra
Subject:	Constance sent you a Yahoo! Greeting

Surprise! You've just received a Yahoo! Greeting
from "Constance" (constancebanks@yahoo.com)!

To view this greeting card, click on the following
Web address at anytime within the next 60 days.

http://greetings.yahoo.com/greet/view?WQIEVIXMW6CKZ

If that doesn't work, go to http://greetings.yahoo.com/pickup and
copy and paste this code:

WQIEVIXMW6CKZ

Enjoy!

The Yahoo! Greetings Team

-------------------------
Congratulations from BabyUniverse.com on your new arrival!
Don't forget to visit BabyUniverse.com for all your baby gear needs at:
      http://www.babyuniverse.com/index.asp?rc=yahgretcardnotify


Never mind.  They are now changing their price to 6.23.  Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Megan Parker/Corp/Enron on 01/22/2001
02:58 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Megan Parker                           01/22/2001 02:50 PM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: PG&E Texas 11/00

Just a heads up... you might be getting a call from PG&E regarding the price
difference on deal 510422.  Their trader is staying with 6.26.

Megan


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Lynn-OUT OF OFFICE

Date:		2/28/2001
Time:		8:00 AM - 5:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Interesting piece on Skilling's departure (mentions EnronOnline as the only success we've seen in recent times).

- R

-----Original Message-----
From: SCIENTECH IssueAlert [mailto:IssueAlert@scientech.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 8:39 AM
Subject: SPECIAL ISSUEALERT: Big Texas News: Wood In As FERC Chairman,
Skilling Out as Enron CEO


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 01/04/2001 10:28 AM -----

	showard@agsk.com
	01/03/2001 03:37 PM

		 To: richard.b.sanders@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: NSM Depositions

Brian's deposition is now firm for 1/18, 1/19, and possibly 1/20 in Houston.
Let's plan on prep on 1/16 and 1/17.

McConville's deposition seems to have fallen off the radar screen again.

Hennegan also wants  to depose Julien Smythe at Akin Gump, which may be a
little troublesome fo us.

Steve

................................................

ALSCHULER GROSSMAN STEIN & KAHAN LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
www.agsk.com

2049 Century Park East
Thirty-Ninth Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067-3213
Tel 310-277-1226
Fax 310-552-6077

This transmission is intended only for the use
of the addressee and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential and exempt from
disclosure under applicable law. If you are not
the intended recipient, or the employee or agent
responsible for delivering the message to the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any dissemination, distribution or copying of
this communication is strictly prohibited.

If you have received this communication
in error, please notify us immediately
via e-mail at postmaster@agsk.com or
by telephone at 310-277-1226. Thank you.

...............................................


With regard to capacity release I think we will have to give the replacement
shipper the cash-for-fuel option, because what if we have sold capacity that
was created by the releasing shipper's buying fuel from us?  If the
replacement shipper suddenly starts shipping fuel, that capacity goes away.
(It's sort of like the EFBH/resulting forward haul problem).  Probably we
should require that the cash for fuel election automatically transfer to the
replacement shipper.  This would probably have to go into our tariff
someplace when we make our FERC filing; otherwise it might run contrary to
our current tariff provisions and practice.  Another solution might be to
just sell resulting capacity as LFT, daily FTS-1 or even FTS-3 capacity (with
some modifications to the FTS-3 Rate Schedule, of course), which would allow
us the flexibility not to schedule on certain days.  For longer-term deals
this might not be practicable, though.

Further questions...let me know.

Ramona Betancourt
06/20/2000 02:04 PM
To: Christine Stokes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON,
Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Debbie
Moseley/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sheila Nacey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lynn
Blair/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julia White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John
Buchanan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Richard Hanagriff/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Elizabeth
Brown/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, David Duff/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Gerry
Medeles/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: TW Cash for Fuel Issues

Christine,

After our meeting last week, John, Elizabeth, Gerry, Richard, Dave & I
discussed various options related to this cash for fuel process. We had
several open issues that came up in our discussions and they are as follows:

Regulatory/Legal issue: Can we have contract specific language on our firm
contracts that would prevent the firm shipper from releasing this fuel
discount  cash option to an acquiring shipper?     If we must offer this
special cash option to the acquiring shipper we will need to build a process
to track this fuel option from the firm shipper to the releasing shipper.
This will require more system modifications that we have not accounted for at
this time.

Shipper nomination issue: How will we handle shipper nomination line items
that are nominated as overrun paths on their firm contracts?  Could we
default these "02" overrun transactions to calculate the fuel in kind using
our existing tariff fuel %?  This would  make the process of trying to
reconcile the contracted MDQ fuel volumes easier when we verify that the
volumes the shipper elected to pay in cash tie back to the total volumes
scheduled & paid for in cash..

Tariff Sheet issue:  When you state in the tariff provision that "The shipper
may use the cash for fuel option only if the posted point of sale is a
receipt point on shipper's service agreement" Does this only apply to the
shipper's primary receipt points?

I would appreciate it if you could respond to these issues. If you feel like
we should meet to discuss, I will be glad to set up another meeting. Please
let me know.

Thanks Ramona


Everything has been zeroed out so I guess its a moot point.
---------------------- Forwarded by Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT on 02/12/2001
01:51 PM ---------------------------

Rhonda L Denton
02/12/2001 01:50 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Deal # 514237

Carla Hoffman put a deal under an inactivated CP.  Can you check it out.  We
should not be using inactivated CPs, and its an east CP.  Thanks for your
help.


Andy, Travis

Please see below

Thanks.
Justin
---------------------- Forwarded by Justin Boyd/LON/ECT on 01/12/2000 14:09
---------------------------

"Pearey, Nicholas" <nicholas.pearey@linklaters.com> on 01/12/2000 12:20:28
To: "'goneill@internetcapital.com'" <goneill@internetcapital.com>,
"'sduckett@internetcapital.com'" <sduckett@internetcapital.com>,
"'peter.sellars@emetra.com'" <peter.sellars@emetra.com>,
"'heinz.schimmelbusch@safeguard.com'" <heinz.schimmelbusch@safeguard.com>,
"'david.wallis@decherteu.com'" <david.wallis@decherteu.com>,
"'jonathan.wood@lovells.com'" <jonathan.wood@lovells.com>,
"'KMildwaters@milbank.com'" <KMildwaters@milbank.com>
cc: "'Justin.Boyd@enron.com'" <Justin.Boyd@enron.com>,
"'Bruce.Garner@enron.com'" <Bruce.Garner@enron.com>, "Goodwin, John"
<john.goodwin@linklaters.com>, "Tee, Rachel" <rachel.tee@linklaters.com>

Subject: Price Posting

Please find attached a draft of the price posting agreement to be entered
into between Enron Power Operations Limited and eMetra.

The draft is circulated subject to final approvals being obtained internally
at Enron. Please address any questions or comments that you may have on this
agreement to Rachel Tee of Linklaters in the first instance.

Regards

Nick Pearey
Solicitor
Linklaters, London
Tel: (44-20) 7456 3238
Fax: (44-20) 7456 2286
nicholas.pearey@linklaters.com

http://www.linklaters.com
http://www.linklaters-alliance.com

____________________________________________________________

This message is confidential. It may also be privileged or
otherwise protected by work product immunity or other legal
rules. If you have received it by mistake please let us know
by reply and then delete it from your system; you should not
copy the message or disclose its contents to anyone.
____________________________________________________________

 - Price Posting Agreement 1.12.00.doc


LK,
Nice presentation, I'll give other comments later.
mike


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 06/18/2001 05:26 PM -----

	Alan Comnes/ENRON@enronXgate
	06/18/2001 05:19 PM

		 To: Tom Alonso/ENRON@enronXgate, Ray Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Badeer/ENRON@enronXgate, Tim Belden/ENRON@enronXgate, Christopher F
Calger/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Michael M
Driscoll/ENRON@enronXgate, Mark Fischer/ENRON@enronXgate, Chris H
Foster/ENRON@enronXgate, Mark Guzman/ENRON@enronXgate, Steve C
Hall/ENRON@enronXgate, Tim Heizenrader/ENRON@enronXgate, Paul
Kaufman/ENRON@enronXgate, Elliot Mainzer/ENRON@enronXgate, Chris
Mallory/ENRON@enronXgate, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Matt
Motley/ENRON@enronXgate, Dave Perrino/SF/ECT@ECT, Phillip
Platter/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeff Richter/ENRON@enronXgate, Diana
Scholtes/ENRON@enronXgate, Chris Stokley/ENRON@enronXgate, Stephen
Swain/ENRON@enronXgate, Mike Swerzbin/ENRON@enronXgate, Bill Williams
III/ENRON@enronXgate, Greg Wolfe/ENRON@enronXgate
		 cc:
		 Subject: FERC Order

I am informed the order will be effective 6/19/01, Tuesday.  The full order
is not out.  Here is the press release.

Alan Comnes


As the Global VP/MD mid-year PRC draws closer, I want to take the opportunity
to stress to you the importance of  updating your profile information in the
GIS system.  Details on your current responsibilities, employment history,
skills and education should have been updated by 7 July 2000.   For those of
you that have not opened your profile in GIS, I urge you to do so as soon as
possible to ensure that your profiles are current and complete.

GIS is accessible via the HRWEB home page on the intranet.  You may go to
hrweb.enron.com and look for the GIS link, or just type eglobal.enron.com on
the command line of the browser.

Your  timely response to this request is greatly appreciated.

Thank you,


Sally,

I am so excited for you and your promotion.  I have had the privilege to see
the impact you have made on this organization, and I am very glad to see you
get the rewards you well deserve.  You simply amaze me, and I have such a
tremendous amount of respect for you and your contributions and values.

CONGRATULATIONS!!!

Brenda


FTR team,

The copy of the auction results that you got at yesterday's meeting is
incorrect. What happened was when I tried to sort the entire page, I only
highlighted the related column and expected Excel 98 would sort the whole
page. (As Steve told me before, I should highlight the whole thing if I try
to do sorting in Excel). I appolized for the misleading and have redone the
whole thing.  Thanks for the patience. Wish you all have a great weekend.


Texans Weekly Update
Jan. 11, 2002
houstontexans.com

INSIDE THIS ISSUE...
1. Texans Ink Three Free Agents
2. Top of the Heap
3. Texans Tracker
4. In the Spotlight
5. High Definition
6. Back to School
7. Coming Attraction
8. Live Off Kirby Drive
9. Going Fast

1. TEXANS INK THREE FREE AGENTS
The Texans signed three more free agents Friday, including reigning CFL
rushing champion Michael Jenkins.
http://houstontexans.com/news/index.cfm?cont_id=90018&NSLN=0111

***************
SHOW YOUR PRIDE
Wear what the new players wear by securing your own Reebok personalized
jersey!

Buy yours today!
http://houstontexans.com/news/index.cfm?cont_id=81593&NS=true&NSLN=0111
***************

2. TOP OF THE HEAP
The Texans top the 2002 NFL Draft order, which the league released this
week.
http://houstontexans.com/news/index.cfm?cont_id=89462&NSLN=0111

3. TEXANS TRACKER
Follow potential Texans at the college and pro level with our Texans
Tracker.
http://houstontexans.com/news/index.cfm?cont_id=72755&NSLN=0111

4. IN THE SPOTLIGHT
CNN/SI spent the day at the Texans' offices Friday, interviewing Charley
Casserly and Dom Capers for an hour-long documentary that will air after
the college draft. The network will also track the Texans at the Senior
Bowl and the Expansion Draft.

5. HIGH DEFINITION
Barco will install Reliant Stadium's seven video display boards, the
Texans and RodeoHouston announced this week.
http://houstontexans.com/news/index.cfm?cont_id=89808&NSLN=0111

***************
TEXANS RED ADIDAS NEO-CLASSIC POLO
Created with 100% cotton pique, this short-sleeved Neo-Classic Polo by
Adidas is a great addition to any wardrobe.

On sale now in the Texans Official Online Store for only $19.99!

Buy one today!
http://houstontexans.com/news/index.cfm?cont_id=56197&ns=true&NSLN=0111
***************

6. BACK TO SCHOOL
Toro paid a visit to Turner Elementary in Houston this week.
http://houstontexans.com/sidelines/index.cfm?cont_id=89888&NSLN=0111

7. COMING ATTRACTION
Reliant Stadium's debut is eight months away, but you can get a taste of
what's to come with our interactive panorama.
http://206.180.236.134/houston_texans/

8. LIVE OFF KIRBY DRIVE
Catch our live glimpse of Reliant Stadium on KTRK's Live Texans Cam.
http://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/sports/texans_cam.html

9. GOING FAST
Texans PSLs and Non-PSL Season Tickets are going fast. Click here to
order now or call 1-877-NFL-2002. Great suite locations are also
available. Call (713) 336-7878 for suite information.
http://www.2002stadiumfund.com

---
You are currently subscribed to texansnews as: plove@enron.com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-texansnews-182292V@newsletter.houstontexans.com


Dear John,

The following are the amounts that make up the $5.8 mil.  I have looked into
your query and noted that there was a late adjustment not exported to us (so
not captured in the DPR).  The adjustment will be reflected in today's DPR.

Please call me at 713 408 4315 if you have any questions.

Best regards

 Shona

To: Shona Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Cassandra Schultz/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Dec 13 DPR

Shona,
Pls do the following asap:

 Introduce yourself to John and make sure he knows the most expeditiious ways
to get information regarding the content of the DPR and Executive Reports.
 Pls consider this request.  I think it is a good idea to either put comments
on the Corp DPR or each business unit should have their own summary executive
report that could give more detail.

John,
FYI, Shona works in Sally Beck's Global Operations group and (among 5,000
other things) is in charge of the group that puts together the DPR.
Cassandra Schultz, who is also copied here, is a VP who works for me in
charge of Policy issues and works closely with Shona.

My first day physicallyt at Enron House is planned for 1/8/01.
Ted
---------------------- Forwarded by Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT on 12/15/2000 07:10 AM
---------------------------

John Sherriff
12/15/2000 12:18 AM
To: Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Dec 13 DPR

Our DPR shows a $5.8 million loss in other for the day.  Can we add notes
onto this report so we can see what is happening here - I am not
sure what this is.

Thanks!

John