[IMAGE]
 Attention Fantasy Players! Cant find that perfect gift? Let MVP.com make it easy for you! Save 10% on your next purchase when you purchase a Gift Certificate from now until 12/27/01. Click Here for Details .     Brought to you by   Sponsorship Bar You are receiving these e-reports because you have signed up for CBS SportsLine.com Fantasy Football.  To customize, reschedule, or turn off these reports please  click here    NFL Reports, Player Updates  [IMAGE]Latest NFL Player News  Jeff Graham , WR SD - oops, I did it again Updated 12/23/01 Graham probably won't play Sunday at Kansas City because of the death of his father in a car accident, coach Mike Riley said Friday. If Graham doesn't play, Trevor Gaylor will start in his place and Nate Turner will be signed off the practice squad. The Chargers are already missing their No. 3 receiver, Tim Dwight, due to complications of a collapsed lung.   Antowain Smith , RB NE - The Guzzlers Updated 12/23/01 Smith rushed for a career-high 156 yards and a touchdown Saturday. He has been one of the best runners in the AFC and will help carry your team to Fantasy glory.     Steve McNair , QB TEN - North Blvd Nutwhackers Updated 12/23/01 McNair played Saturday despite suffering from back spasms all week. He played well, throwing a touchdown pass in the second half. Expect him to be a solid No. 1 QB.  Jeff Garcia , QB SF - The Guzzlers Updated 12/23/01 Garcia, whose practice time was limited all week, played in Saturday's game. He admitted afterwards that he has a cracked rib. He played with extra padding, saying it didn't greatly affect his throws. Garcia might not be at full strength in the remaining weeks but he will still be a solid No. 1 Fantasy QB.   Eddie George , RB TEN - Thrill Kill Cult Updated 12/23/01 George played in Saturday's game despite suffering from an ankle injury. He left in the third quarter because of a neck injury but returned to the game.  Oronde Gadsden , WR MIA - Thrill Kill Cult Updated 12/23/01  Gadsden did not play in Saturday's game against the Patriots because of a hamstring injury. Chris Chambers started in his absence.  Fred Beasley , RB SF - Free Agent Updated 12/23/01 Beasley broke his right hand. He will probably be sidelined for the rest of the regular season.   Joe Horn , WR NO - The Lie Downs Updated 12/21/01 Horn is once again performing like an elite Fantasy receiver. He is a must-start player during the final weeks of the NFL season.   Maurice Smith , RB ATL - Who's Yo Daddy Updated 12/21/01 A banged-up Smith hasn't done much statistically in recent weeks. Don't depend on him during the Fantasy playoffs.   Donald Hayes , WR CAR - Free Agent Updated 12/21/01 Hayes may step back into the forefront this week as the No. 1 wideout in place of Muhsin Muhammad. He isn't very explosive, however, and won't help Fantasy teams much during Weeks 15 through 17.    Chris Weinke , QB CAR - The Lie Downs Updated 12/21/01 Consider Weinke as a backup during the Fantasy playoffs. He lacks the weapons to post better-than-average numbers, but he is a good option if you need an emergency QB.   Kurt Warner , QB STL - Who's Yo Daddy Updated 12/21/01 Warner should guide many Fantasy teams to success during the playoffs. Expect fine numbers from him the rest of the way.  Rich Gannon , QB OAK - The Executioners Updated 12/21/01 Gannon has been a top-flight Fantasy QB this year. He will be a key player on many title teams, and should never be benched.   Randy Moss , WR MIN - Meximullets Updated 12/21/01 Moss started off slow this season but has once again been one of the best wideouts. Don't hesitate to start him during your playoff run.  Marvin Minnis , WR KC - North Blvd Nutwhackers Updated 12/21/01 Minnis hasn't done much to help Fantasy owners this year. Don't use him during the remaining weeks of the NFL season.   Michael Westbrook , WR WAS - The Snake Pit Updated 12/21/01 Westbrook has been inconsistent this season as a Fantasy player. He will be a good No. 2 at best during your playoffs.  Rod Gardner , WR WAS - Not So Nice Machine Updated 12/21/01 Gardner has been very inconsistent this season. Unless you play in a deeper league, starting Gardner isn't advisable.    Tony Richardson , RB KC - Free Agent Updated 12/21/01 Richardson hasn't been a consistent scoring threat this year. Don't use him during the Fantasy playoffs.   Tony Gonzalez , TE KC - The Executioners Updated 12/21/01 Gonzalez hasn't played as well as expected this year. Still, he is too talented to bench during the Fantasy playoffs.   Brett Favre , QB GB - The Fat Bastards Updated 12/21/01 Favre has been one of the best QBs this season. Count on him to help lead your team to Fantasy glory.  Trent Green , QB KC - Meximullets Updated 12/21/01 Green has been an inconsistent Fantasy QB this year. He is a risky start during the rest of the season.   Bill Schroeder , WR GB - Not So Nice Machine Updated 12/21/01 Schroeder has had a solid season. Look for him to be a reliable No. 2 wideout during your postseason.  Matt Hasselbeck , QB SEA - Free Agent Updated 12/21/01 Hasselbeck has been a big disappointment this year. Don't use him during the Fantasy postseason.   Johnnie Morton , WR DET - The Lie Downs Updated 12/21/01 Morton has been inconsistent this season but he will still be a solid No. 2 during the Fantasy playoffs. Keep him in your lineup.  Reggie Wayne , WR IND - Meximullets Updated 12/21/01 Wayne is healthy again, and showing signs of improvement. But he is not accomplishing enough statistically to help most Fantasy teams.   Amani Toomer , WR NYG - The Fat Bastards Updated 12/21/01 Toomer is having a bit of a down year, but his potential to post solid Fantasy numbers makes him worth considering. He should be a solid No. 2 wideout during your playoffs.  Marvin Harrison , WR IND - The Snake Pit Updated 12/21/01 Harrison will be an important Fantasy player during the final weeks of the NFL season. He will have some good outings, even though the Colts are not in the playoff race.   Duce Staley , RB PHI - The Fat Bastards Updated 12/21/01 Staley started to play well late in the season. Be sure to keep him into your starting lineup. He will be an adequate back for the playoffs.    Shawn Bryson , RB BUF - Free Agent Updated 12/21/01 Bryson will start in place of the injured Travis Henry this week. Consider him as a No. 2 RB if you need help at that spot.   James Thrash , WR PHI - The Fat Bastards Updated 12/21/01 Thrash was not very consistent during the regular season and may not catch a lot of TD passes in the final games of the NFL regular season. He will be a No. 2 wideout at best during the Fantasy playoffs.   More Updates  Schedule, Breakdown  [IMAGE] The Executioners Player Pos Points Gannon, Rich  QB 45.0 Barber, Tiki  RB 0.0 Davis, Stephen  RB 0.0 Booker, Marty  WR 0.0 Carter, Cris  WR 0.0 Warrick, Peter  WR 0.0 Gonzalez, Tony  TE 0.0 Vinatieri, Adam  K 8.0 Jets  DT 0.0   [IMAGE] TOTAL   53.0   [IMAGE] Williams, Roland  TE 12.0 Bledsoe, Drew  QB 0.0 Brady, Tom  QB 24.0 Canidate, Trung  RB 0.0 Connell, Albert  WR 0.0 Jefferson, Shawn  WR 0.0 Tomlinson, LaDainian  RB 0.0   [IMAGE] at The Fat Bastards Player Pos Points Favre, Brett  QB 0.0 Staley, Duce  RB 22.0 Williams, Ricky  RB 0.0 Boston, David  WR 0.0 Jackson, Willie  WR 0.0 Toomer, Amani  WR 0.0 Conwell, Ernie  TE 0.0 Carney, John  K 0.0 Saints  DT 0.0   [IMAGE] TOTAL   22.0   [IMAGE] Testaverde, Vinny  QB 0.0 Bennett, Michael  RB 0.0 Glenn, Terry  WR 0.0 Huntley, Richard  RB 0.0 McAllister, Deuce  RB 0.0 Thrash, James  WR 6.0 Williams, Boo  TE 0.0   [IMAGE]  Copyright 2001 Commissioner.COM Inc and SportsLine.com Inc. Your site can be reached from http://fantasy.sportsline.com   FB10SP


To:								Department:  	ENA Legal

From:		Mark Taylor					Date:	May 11, 2001
		Vice President and General Counsel

Subject:	Enron North America Corp. NYMEX Hedge Exemption Applications

We are in the process of preparing applications for position limit exemptions for ENA's NYMEX energy commodities futures trading.  These applications require that ENA represent whether its officers, employees, owners, or agents have a power of attorney, control or have a financial interest in any related commodity future(s) account either individually or acting with another person pursuant to express or implied agreement.

Please direct any responses to my paralegal, Tana Jones, via intercompany email or call her at (713) 853-3399 by the end of business on June 15, 2001 if you have any power of attorney, control or have a financial interest in any commodity futures account (other than an ENA or other trading affiliate account).

IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A COMMODITY FUTURES ACCOUNT, YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESPOND TO THIS REQUEST.


There was at least a third of it left, but it's in the trash now.  You're
welcome to come get it.  I'm craving the brownies that I know are on my
counter at home.


UGI ships the gas for CES.  Normally we sell CES this gas at ELA.  It looks
like it will be at CGLF Mainline for the next few months.  Doug will verify
this information and let us know.

jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com on 04/21/2000 11:54:33 AM
To: " - *Scott.Goodell@enron.com" <Scott.Goodell@enron.com>
cc: " - *Bizik, Kim" <knovsek@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " -
*Chris.Germany@enron.com" <Chris.Germany@enron.com>, " - *Kinney, Doug"
<BLOCK@columbiaenergygroup.com>
Subject: Capacity for UGI

Got an fax from UGI saying that the capacity they release for our customers
will be on Gulf/Tco from May thru Sep. I believe this is a change from TETCO.
Call me if you need a copy of the fax.


up to 69.75 from a low of 66.06!  Big buyers?  Avg daily volume = 3.09M
shares, today - 3.06M so far


Hey guys,

Just wanted to confirm that that NIMO gas 300 East Meter and actually just 214
to the West Meter was purchased through the EOM.

ALSO

At NYSEG, I need to purchase TCO  300dth/day from 1/27 to 1/31 to send to Mkt
21.  I believe that it is Op 2, Mkt 21, please check with Joann Collins to
double check that Op area, I don't have my chart with me.

Please let me know ASAP.  Thanks!


The above mentioned group is picketing our offices.  The police are en
route.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Jamie_K_Schnorf@fpl.com@ENRON   On Behalf Of Jamie_K_Schnorf@fpl.com
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 10:07 AM
To:	Art_R_Morris@fpl.com; Spraggins, Gary; Adams, Jean; Linhart, Joe; Michael_Jessop@fpl.com; Janzen, Randy; Ronald_Scheirer@fpl.com; TransOKnoms@enogex.com
Cc:	Forbish, Sherry; Greaney, Chris
Subject:	Lamar Nomination

Attached is the NNG Lamar burn schedule for January 23, 2002.  At this time
we plan on  45,000.

Thanks

Jamie Schnorf - FPL
561-625-7032

(See attached file: NNG LAMAR NOMNATION.xls)
 - NNG LAMAR NOMNATION.xls


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 12/11/2000
08:30 AM ---------------------------

"hollyw" <hollyw@email.msn.com> on 12/09/2000 09:18:28 AM
To: <Tompam1@aol.com>, "Steph and MO" <headbergms1@home.com>, "Stan & Katie
Wright" <stanchas@aol.com>, "Stacy Warren" <swarre02@coair.com>, "Sheri
Thomas" <Sheri.Thomas@enron.com>, "Shane Herzog" <SHERZOG@ridgways.com>,
"Rochelle Smith" <rochelle@waterengineers.com>, "Rick Couvillon"
<julierickcouv@hotmail.com>, "Rella Snetsinger \(E-mail\)"
<rella13@zebra.net>, "Raymond Paterson" <ray_paterson@hotmail.com>, "Randy
Howes" <rhowes@manistee-isd.k12.mi.us>, "Pete Weidler" <pweidle@enron.com>,
"Nicol, Gary" <nicolg@bp.com>, "Matt Frazier" <fraz2girls@ev1.net>, "Len"
<bigusdickus70@hotmail.com>, <KSowada@aol.com>, "KRISTI GIRON"
<KRISTI.GIRON@cfisd.net>, "JoJo" <jhenness@webtv.net>, "John Schmitz"
<jschm@telxon.com>, "Jim Miller" <jraggie1@pdq.net>, "Jim Henness \(E-mail\)"
<jhennes@c2i2.com>, "Jill Barnett" <barnett.grp@gateway.net>, "Janine Gregor"
<janine.gregor@talk21.com>, "Gary Wright" <wrightgr@udmercy.edu>, "Diego
Gotthelf" <dygotthelf@hotmail.com>, "Debbie \(Home\)" <jamoma3@cs.com>,
"Darron C Giron" <Darron.C.Giron@enron.com>, "Dana Smith"
<dsmith@s3ccpa.com>, "Charlene Anderson" <foxter@rionet.com.br>, "Caro
Paterson" <patersr@sinectis.com.ar>, "Brent Wallace"
<bwallace@zahrsecurities.com>, "Ben Schulein" <advantage@infovia.com.ar>,
"Barbara Denson" <bbdenson@pdq.net>, "Amanda Godley" <agodley@csus.edu>
cc:
Subject: Fw: Xmas Suit

----- Original Message -----
From: "benandphyllistobias" <benandphyllistobias@compuserve.com>
To: "hollyw" <hollyw@email.msn.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 09, 2000 8:49 AM
Subject: Xmas Suit

 - Xmassuit.gif


This memo will confirm our dinner meeting to be held August 2, 2000 at the
River Oaks Grill:

    DATE:   August 2, 2000
    PLACE:   The Wine Room
        River Oaks Grill
        2630 Westheimer
        713/520-1738
    TIME:    6:30 PM

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Kay (3X0643) or
Beverly (5X7857).

I will look forward to seeing you there.


NEW DIALING INSTRUCTIONS

To:          All Enron Houston Users

Subject:   New Dialing Instructions

Ref:   Tie Line Access Code Changes - Enron Houston Users

Just a reminder, the access codes for remote locations were modified within the Enron Building phone system.  The modifications will affect users as follows:

1.        We have changed the first digit dialed when accessing the Tie Lines from 7 to 8.  This change will only affect Enron Building users.
2.        The second and third digits of the London, Calgary, Omaha, and Portland tie lines have also changed.  This change will affect all users.  All other digits of existing dial strings will remain the same.  For your reference, a list of the new dial strings is identified in the table below.

REVISED DIAL STRINGS FOR ENRON TIE LINE NETWORK
Users must dial 8 digits to call via Tie Lines

Enron Location	Old String	New String
Beijing	7 810 XXXX	8 810 XXXX
Buenos Aires	7 900 XXXX	8 900 XXXX
Calgary	7 403 XXXX	8 283 XXXX
Caracas	7 58 XXXXX	8 58 XXXXX
Chicago	7 220 XXXX	8 220 XXXX
Dahbol India	7 812 XXXX	8 812 XXXX
Hinsdale	7 235 XXXX	8 235 XXXX
London	7 830 XXXXX	8 44 XXXXX
Monterey	7 152 2XXX	8 152 2XXX
New York	7 212 XXXX	8 212 XXXX
New York Metals	7 211 XXXX	8 211 XXXX
Omaha	7 87 XXXX	8 287 XXXX
Portland	7 834 XXXX	8 234 XXXX
Rio De Janiero	7 920 XXXX	8 920 XXXX
Sao Paulo	7 910 XXXX	8 910 XXXX
Sydney	7 800 XXXX	8 800 XXXX
Tokyo	7 860 XXXX	8 860 XXXX
Toronto	7 285 XXXX	8 285 XXXX
Washington DC (Future)	N/A	8 245 XXXX

* X represents an extension number


can't do it this weekend du my kids' football games.  thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mckay, Jonathan
Sent:	Wednesday, November 07, 2001 4:25 PM
To:	Lavorato, John; Tycholiz, Barry; Holst, Keith; Storey, Geoff; Arnold, John; Jenkins, Beth; Benson, Robert; Pimenov, Vladi; Mckay, Brad; Maggi, Mike; Griffith, John; Marquez, Jose; Roberts, Mike A.; Bennett, Stephen; Ames, Chuck; Neal, Scott
Subject:

Hello,

I was just dropping this note to see if anyone was interested in getting together for the Rice Owls homecoming game against Tulsa this weekend.  Game time is 2 pm and I thought we would get walk-up tickets (eveyman for himself).  If people are interested we would have a little tailgate party prior to kick-off and watch the 6-3 Owls (undefeated at home)  kill the Tulsa Hurricanes.  Drop me a line if you have interest as I am trying to get critical mass.

Jon

PS. Please invite anyone that has interest in coming along and bring your kids if you have them.


\scripts\netscape.wbt "http://x12.enron.com/hottap.htm"


---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 09/17/99 01:40
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Jarrod Cyprow                           09/16/99 04:34 PM

To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: KPM Lasara Swap & Put Drafts

I have attached the KPM Lasara Drafts. Please let me know if you have any
questions.

Thank you,
JC


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 12/12/2000 01:02 PM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	12/12/2000 11:47 AM

		 To: Jennifer Rudolph/HOU/EES@EES
		 cc: Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: California Deregulation Summary

Jennifer:  I got a call from Chris Bailey (sp?) needing a summary of
California dereg for a presentation(s) that Harold's assembling.  Attached is
summary that Mona pulled together for Harold a couple of months ago.  I don't
have Chris' email address (I've left him a message).  Could you forward this
along to him?  Thanks a bunch.

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 12/12/2000 11:44 AM -----

	Mona L Petrochko
	12/12/2000 11:38 AM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: California Deregulation Summary

FYI.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron on 12/12/2000
11:37 AM ---------------------------

	Enron Energy Services

	From:  Jennifer Rudolph                           10/05/2000 03:40 PM

To: Harold G Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Beverly Aden/HOU/EES@EES, Edward Hamb/HOU/EES@EES, Mona L
Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES

Subject: California Deregulation Summary

Per Ed's request, here is a summary of California's deregulation history:

If you have any questions, please page me!
---Jennifer
wk 713-345-8206
pgr 877-681-5956


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 05/08/2001 03:33
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Chris Germany                           04/30/2001 02:43 PM

To: Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Meredith Homco/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: One more deal change

Hey buddy.  Please allocate the followin deals to 0 for the 9th only.  My
mistake and I will owe you for life.

deal 720977, 720959, and 720986


Hey Janie,
     I mailed the clubs today through the post office.  The delivery confirmation number is  0300 1290 0007 1615 9547  and the web site to track it on is www.usps.com  or call  1-800-222-1811.  I took all the stickers off the clubs so all you have to do is take the stickers off the box then wrap it.
     Cost breakdown:
            Austad's Golf         681.56
            Post Office               16.75
                   Total              698.31
      P.S.     I'll send the receipts via mail


Teco Tap       87.500 / HPL Gas Daily

LS HPL LSK IC       7.500 / Enron


FYI.  We'll keep what we have here in electronic form and hardcopy.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Scott, Denver
Sent:	05 November 2001 09:46
To:	Scrimshaw, Matthew
Cc:	Edison, Andrew; Bramwell, James
Subject:	FW: European email and data retention policies in relation to EBS litigation

Matthew,

Attached below is an update I sent to Paul Freeman regarding EBS data retention.
The most important point to make in relation to the current litigation is that we can only provide data backups as far back as March/April 2001 and email backups as far back as 2001,
EBS systems were administered by the EBS US IT team prior to these dates.
Please let me know if you have any questions.

Regards
Denver Scott
European IT Operations
Direct Tel: 	+44 (0) 207 783 7667
Fax: 	+44 (0) 207 783 8813
Mobile: 	+44 (0) 7768 735 804
Email: 	denver.scott@enron.com

EBS in Europe
Prior to March 2001 EBS Europe had a independent infrastructure that was located in EH but administered out of the US by Scott Abshire and team.
The European IT team had no access to the EBS environment and as such were unable to backup the data.

During March 2001 all EH based EBS users were migrated to the CORP domain but retained access to their US based Notes email system.
At this time, all data files located on the EBS data server were migrated to the European S: drive, all user data was migrated to their respective H: drives.
The users continued to use their US based email system.

From the start of July, 2001 these EBS users were then migrated from the US based EBS email system to our Exchange system.

Implications for EBS litigation:
European IT Ops can only provide backups of the user data from March/April 2001 and email data from August 2001
Backups from prior to these dates would be held in the US (if they exist)

All continuing EBS employees and employees who have been redeployed from EBS to other Enron business units have had their mailbox size restrictions removed (to prevent any loss of email data relevant to litigation)


<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">

SCIENTECH Completes 300 Utility Surveys
Focused on the North American

 Customer Care Market

In 2001 SCIENTECH launched a multi-client study of utility customer care in the United States and Canada and recently completed 300 surveys. Respondents to the survey were classified as follows:

	Investor-Owned Utility

	11%

	Co-operative

	26%

	Municipality

	35%

	Energy Retailers

	4.3%

	Other

	23.7%

The survey effectively captured the current pulse of the utility industry on such areas as customer information systems (CIS), billing systems, customer relationship management systems (CRM) and phone centers. It covers utilities that supply electric, gas, water, wastewater, waste management, cable, and telecomm services to customers.

SCIENTECH energy consultants are currently performing detailed analysis on the survey results and are building a final report to be delivered at the end of January 2002 to subscribers. This in-depth multi-client survey and report includes:

	Status report of the North American customer marketplace

	Identification of leading competitiors

	Identification and forecast of drivers of utility technology decisions

	Analysis of license sales versus ASP sales

	Evaluation of new market opportunities

	Latest service-delivery technologies

	Identification of growing/shrinking markets

	Market size indicators and projections

"Most utilities, retailers, and other energy companies are evaluating how to drive business innovation to become more cost effective while increasing customer service whether they participate in regulated, transitioning or competitive energy markets," said Denese Van Dyne, Vice President Marketing, Peace Software. "The preliminary data from the 300 companies who participated in SCIENTECH's survey is quite interesting and the subsequent analysis should provide fact-based data to fuel our leading market momentum across all market models."

"Enmax Encompass provides customer and transaction services in both the regulated and unregulated Canadian markets focused on the municipals," said Lori Topp, COO of Encompass.  "We are very pleased to see the 105 municipal responses to this customer care survey and look forward to utilizing the analysis from SCIENTECH to help us formulate our future business direction."

A statistical summary of the completed survey is currently available to subscribers. To become a subscriber or for more information, please contact SCIENTECH either online, by phone or e-mail:

Online:  www.secure.scientech.com/specialpages/Multi_Client.asp

Phone or e-mail: Jon Brock at 505.244.7607 (jbrock@scientech.com) or Christopher Perdue at 704.362.1158  (cperdue@scientech.com).

SCIENTECH

 is an international provider of consulting and expert technical services that supports clients in government and the electric utilities, telecommunications, and security industries. It offers turnkey product integration solutions in the following areas: Systems Analysis and Deployment, Safety and Risk Evaluation, Engineering, Environmental and Information Technology. SCIENTECH Utility Services can be found at www.scientech.com/rci.

This message is brought to you as a registered user of Energy Central.
                If you wish to discontinue

 receiving this type of message, reply to this message with 'Stop Ads' in the subject of your message.


do we have a mechanism to survey employees?  Can we do a "scientific" poll?
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/HOU/EES on 08/02/2000 03:10
PM ---------------------------

John Sherriff@ECT
08/02/2000 03:46 AM
To: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Jackie Gentle/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Enron Advertising

Mark

Thanks for the call a couple of weeks ago regarding our new ad campaign.  The
challenge as I understand it is that we have difficulty in quantifying the
benefit and effectiveness of our ads.   We can measure on a periodic basis
what the CEO/CCO/CFO perception of Enron is on a periodic basis but this does
not break down the impact of our PR efforts from an ad campaign.   I
understand this dilemma.

But one thing that we could measure that is quite important to me is what our
employees think about these ads.    If all else fails these ads should make
our employees proud to work for Enron - and this is something we should be
able to measure on a consistent basis.

I know you have an upcoming event in California where your organisation will
talk about problems and challenges we have - so if you could consider this
idea I would be very appreciative.  And of course don't get to hooked on
God's country while you are in Napa.

Thanks!

John


Thanks again.


The ClickAtHome Database shows that you have placed an order with Dell Computer with an order number of 641806518. Please read below for instructions:

1.  If this is correct, enjoy your computer!
    You can check your order status by clicking here:
      http://wwwapp.us.dell.com/us/en/ordstat/index.asp

      ** For questions about your order/changes/problems,
         call 1-866-220-3355 **

2.  If you did NOT place an order with Dell for the ClickAtHome program,
    please email enron@avenueb2e.com or call 713-895-9001 to report
    the incorrect order on your behalf.

Thank you!

ClickAtHome Team!


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Smith, Maureen
Sent:	Friday, June 01, 2001 12:08 PM
To:	Germany, Chris
Subject:

http://mis.nyiso.com/public/rtapp/nyiso.html


Sure family walk - I get the message (finally) I will communicate with you
via E-Mail.  (Smiling)
I really dont know about my MOM's -  I am kinda playing around with the Idea
of  hiring chef Wes and trasting them "special' ??
I dont know - what ideas do you have?


Tana:

Attached please find the final execution copy of the Kennecott ETA letter.
Please finalize so that we can circulate for EOL execution.

Leslie


Me and the kids get in at 10am, Kristi has to stay a little later for work
and will be in at 3pm.  I was also thinking we could buy tickets at the
stadium.  Don't worry about not taking time off.  See you Thursday.

DG

Kim.Mayers@mail.sprint.com on 11/07/2000 10:24:50 AM
To: Darron.C.Giron@enron.com
cc:
Subject: RE: Trip

I can't believe it either.  I just accepted a new job, so unfortunately
I don't think I can take any time off.  I am going to try and leave
early Friday.  I'm still testing out the waters over here in my new
group.  I am free in the evenings so I will plan on coming over to
dad's.  I would invite you all to stay at my house, but I don't have any
beds in the bedrooms!  I just moved in and am in the process of
furnishing.  What time are you coming in on Thursday?  Dad and I can
come up with some fun things for you all to do during the day.

We haven't purchased tickets for the game on Saturday.  We were thinking
we could just buy them the day of the game.  Shouldn't be a sell out!
I'm sure KU will lose.  Michelle's family is all excited about going to
the game Saturday.

I'm looking forward to seeing you all.  It's going to be a little cold
so be sure to bring warm clothes!

Kim Mayers
Product Manager
Sprint Broadband Wireless Group
Phone: (913) 315-9132
PCS: (913) 269-8197
Fax: (913) 315-0760
kim.mayers@mail.sprint.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Darron.C.Giron [mailto:Darron.C.Giron@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 10:12 AM
To: Mayers, Kim L.
Cc: Darron.C.Giron
Subject: Trip

I can't believe it is already time for our trip up to Kansas.  We are
arriving on Thursday morning and returning on Sunday morning.  Other
than
the game on Saturday, we don't have any plans.  See you soon.

DG


Attached is a copy of the amended ETA that Carol sent you in early July.
Please let me know if the changes meet with your approval.


The following is a status update regarding the agreed upon decision to
allocate Drift to the Business Units on April 26, 2001:

 A methodology and systems reporting have been developed and an analysis
prepared for the period Jan 2001 - April 2001.  During May, discussions were
held with each of the business units regarding the methodolgy which applies
to all business units and the analysis of results for Jan- April.

A request was made to begin the Drift Allocation process from April 2001.

During this week, we are meeting with the business units to review April and
May numbers and processes.  We are expecting to allocate April and May to the
individual business unit's Drift lines next week.

June numbers will be accumulated on the DPR in an Intra-Month Allocated Drift
line and allocated on the last business day's DPR to the Business Unit.

 Please do not hesitate to call me, 3-3210,  or the representatives of your
business unit,  if you require additional information.

Sheila


TODAY: VA Linux suffers, Agile dumps Ariba
merger and more. Read on.

================= Advertisement ================
THE NASDAQ SLUMP HAS CREATED NEW $1,000,000 OPPORTUNITIES.

FREE Report reveals THREE TECH STOCKS THAT ARE POISED TO BECOME THE NEXT
MICROSOFT, CISCO or INTEL. Now is your chance to pick up a few bargains that
can double, triple even quadruple your money.  Get your FREE Report now!

http://www.BullMarket.com/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?multex2
------------------------------------------------

Featured article this week:
The Sell Report:
VA Linux Systems: The Income Statement As Horror Movie.
VA Linux Systems (LNUX) reported operating results
on May 21, and perhaps now everyone can see why it
was the subject of the Sell Report on March 1. At
the time, I criticized management for not truly
understanding the weakness in the current market.
Click here
http://www.theinternetanalyst.com/individual/010531sections/sellreport.asp

Click Here to go directly to the website.
http://www.theinternetanalyst.com/default.asp

OR go to AOL Keyword Internet Analyst

OR Click Here to download the PDF of issue #114
http://www.theinternetanalyst.com/pdfversions/010531tianl.pdf

OR Download TIA to your PDA at
http://avantgo.com/channels/detail.html?cha_id=2502

E-mail your feedback to The Internet Analyst
at mailto:tia@multex.com

Scroll down and click links below to
go right to a specific article:

Strong Buys:
Accounting Issues Aplenty
Click here
http://www.theinternetanalyst.com/individual/010531sections/strongbuys.asp

================= Advertisement ================

Thinking of refinancing your home?
Visit Multex Investors Personal Finance Channel. Well give you
expert advice on mortgages, insurance, and your most pressing
questions. Top-notch information, commentary, and tools -- FREE.
http://www.multexpf.com?mktg=tapftx3

------------------------------------------------

The Sell Report:
VA Linux Systems: The Income Statement As Horror Movie.
Click here
http://www.theinternetanalyst.com/individual/010531sections/sellreport.asp

Upgrades & Downgrades:
Riverstone Still Looks Good Despite Downgrade.
Click here
http://www.theinternetanalyst.com/individual/010531sections/updown.asp

Executives Zero In:
Co-Founder and CEO of Centillium Communications
Discusses Conquering The Japanese Market.
Click here
http://www.theinternetanalyst.com/individual/010531sections/zeroin.asp

The Real Deal:
The Bulls And The Hyenas
Click here
http://www.theinternetanalyst.com/individual/010531sections/realdeal.asp

================= Advertisement ================

Take charge of your financial future. Open a new Ameritrade
account and get commission-free trades for 1 month. Plus, youll
also get 24/7 customer service, e-mail alerts, free research, and
more. Why wait? Visit www.ameritrade.com
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;2868210;5677087;s?http://www.ameritrade.com/o.cgi?a=dev&o=rjm&p=/html/25mf.fhtml
------------------------------------------------

Venture Capital:
Analyzing the Five-Tool Company, Part II
Click here
http://www.theinternetanalyst.com/individual/010531sections/venture.asp

The Analyst's Spotlight:
Sanders Morris Harris Analyst Talks About
Why Agile Software Aborted Its Merger
With Ariba.
Click here
http://www.theinternetanalyst.com/individual/010531sections/spotlight.asp

IPO Update:
May Brings Sense of Stability in IPO Market
Click here
http://www.theinternetanalyst.com/individual/010531sections/ipoupdate.asp

Rants & Raves:
Why After The Bull Market, The Bear Returns
Click here
http://www.theinternetanalyst.com/individual/010531sections/rantrave.asp

Letters:
Busted!
For Aram
A Special Note
Click here
http://www.theinternetanalyst.com/individual/010531sections/rantrave.asp

RESEARCH REPORT SPOTLIGHT:
Microsoft (MSFT): CIBC World Markets examines Microsoft's
next foray off the desktop: the X-Box. The firm does not expect
the product to be beneficial to the bottom line. Find out
what they think the product will do in their report
which is available for $10, at the URL below.
Click here
http://www.multexinvestor.com/AF001215/download.asp?docid=20693753&ticker=msft

Put in your two cents worth on the Internet
issues that interest you on The Internet Analyst's
message boards.
http://www.sageonline.com/boards/user/non-frames/list.asp?forumid=20210

Like a specific article? Now you can send it
to a friend with just a click. Check out the
send to a friend feature next to each article.

For article reprints, e-mail mailto:lopkine@multex.com

To advertise in this e-mail, ASK FOR TIA at mailto:advertise@multex.com

If you do not wish to receive further issues of The Internet
Analyst, please click on the REPLY button on your email
software, and reply to THIS e-mail message with the word
UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line.


Just so there's no confusion: I, too, have accepted a position with UBS Warburg to be a part of its regulatory affairs team.

Alan Comnes

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Belden, Tim
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:01 PM
To:	DL-Portland World Trade Center
Subject:	Office Update

Chris and I would like to take this opportunity to update everyone on what has been happening on the floor(s) during the last couple of weeks and what is likely to transpire in the weeks to come.  I'd like to begin by apologizing for the lack of broad e-mail communications or floor meetings over the last couple of weeks.  These have been very hard times and I know that people have wanted information.  It has taken us nearly a week to sort through who will be part of the UBS Warburg team and who continue with Enron.

In this e-mail I will explain: (1) who will be going to UBS Warburg, (2) who do the people working for Enron work for and what are they expected to do, (3) how will the physical separation between Enron and UBS Warburg happen, and (4) when will the sale of Netco to UBS Warburg be completed.  In addition to Chris Calger and me, the following Portland-based employees have accepted positions with UBS Warburg:

Last Name	First Name	Last Name	First Name
Amador	Susan	Oh	John
Anderson	John	Platter	M
Bulbes	Victor	Postlethwaite	John
Chang	Fang-Tzu	Richter	Jeffrey
Chatterton	Jill	Robinson	Donald
Crandall	Sean	Salisbury	Holden
Cutsforth	Diane	Scholtes	Diana
Dasovich	Jeff	Semperger	Cara
Davidson	Debra	Sheidun	Donna
Dean	Craig	Shields	Jeffrey
Dunton	Heather	Slinger	Ryan
Etringer	Michael	Solberg	Geir
Gilbert	Michael "Scotty"	Steiner	David
Gustafson	Mollie	Stokley	Marlin "Chris"
Hall	Stephen	Swain	Stephen
Heizenrader	Timothy	Swerzbin	Michael
Kandaswamy	Balachandar	Thomas	Jacob
Lackey	Christopher	Thome	Stephen
Lee	Eugene	Van Houten	Maria
Mallory	Patrick "Chris"	Villeggiante	Theresa
McDonald	Michael	Wente	Laura
Meyer	James	Williams	William J
Meyers	Albert	Woodland	Andrea
Mier	Michael	Yoder	Christian
Nelson	Kourtney

While there are a few people who are still making up their minds, the rest of the people in our office will be working for the Enron estate.  It is not entirely clear to me right now what the management team for west power looks like for the Enron estate now.  As I understand it, there are two primary initiatives on the estate side that people in Portland may be a part of.  The first is the disposition of our development projects that are already well under way.  Dave Parquet in San Francisco has been leading this effort together with the Portland asset development team.  This effort has been ongoing since December.  The second is the disposition of our west power commodity positions.  Jim Fallon is in charge of this for the entire company.  People working on this for Jim include Don Miller, Paul Racicot, Brad Richter, Ed Baughman among others.  I have placed a call to Jim and to Paul to get advice on how people in Portland should proceed.  I would recommend talking to Ed, Brad, Paul, or Don to get direction.  I have placed a call to several of these people to get direction and am waiting for a response.  I am hopeful that they will designate a lead person in Portland to coordinate the power procurement and delivery efforts.

As most of you know, the physical separation between UBS Warburg and Enron has already begun.  People who will continue to work for Enron will be located on the 4th Floor, while UBS Warburg will occoupy the 3rd Floor.  We hope to make the moves to the 4th Floor by the end of this week.  Moves within the 3rd Floor will take place the following week.

The UBS Warburg transaction is subject to one last pro forma regulatory hurdle.  While I don't have an exact date, I am told that it will likely be on or about February 6th.

Finally, I want to once again thank everyone for their help and cooperation over the last few weeks.  These have been really horrible times as the Enron story continues to unfold in the news at the same time that people are finding out about their future with Enron and UBS.  I know that this hasn't been easy for anyone.  I am deeply saddened overseeing the breakup of the awesome team that we have put together.  Whether you are going to UBS, remaining with Enron, or leaving the company, I wish everyone who worked on this team the best in their future endeavors.  It has been a distinct honor to work with each and every one of you.

Regards,
Tim


sorry - confusion - tom alonso had the williams deal with APB down as a
purchase, but he's changing it to a sale just in the interest of checking out
now. Deal # is 534492

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
02/28/2001 03:05 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: apb

do you know the williams deal number?

   Kate Symes @ ECT                02/28/2001 04:56 PM

To: Kerri Thompson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: apb

Yes - it's a Puget deal. I'm trying to contact Sean right now to see if he
and Diana overlapped on these deals. I only see them written once in his
trade log, but I'm auditing the second two to find out who entered them.

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
02/28/2001 02:54 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: apb

534497 is a pudget deal?

   Kate Symes @ ECT                02/28/2001 04:42 PM

To: Kerri Thompson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: apb

Verified with Diana and Sean - these should be APB.

and the Williams deal should be resolved - deal # is 534497

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
02/28/2001 02:39 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: apb

i have 2 more things besides the williams deal.  apb is trying to leave thats
why i was trying to get these deals resolved.

534496
534497

apb does not recognize, these may be duplicated deals that are already in the
system.

thanks


They can't open the attachment.  Is there a way to save it in an earlier
version of Word and resend?  Also, please print the attachment and fax it to
Mike Colo, 252 972 7014.

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 07/25/2000 08:41
AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kay Mann                           07/24/2000 06:41 PM

To: mscolo@poynerspruill.com, kraber@electricities.org
cc: Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Land Option

Gentlemen,

Due to some internal comments we have made some revisions to the land option
agreement.  The most significant change is that it is clear that the option
payment is not refundable, and will not be applied against the purchase
price.  There is also a clarification in paragraph 9 (re assignment) that the
assignee remains responsible for any liability arising prior to assignment.

I believe we are ready to go forward with signature when you are.  Please
advise if this version is acceptable.  Also, please let me know if you would
like for me to have a redline version prepared.

Kay


Monday is great--I'm giving this to Lay then.

- Rob

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	04/20/2001 05:34 PM

		 To: Rob Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: FW: Sacramento Pres Final 4_13_01(projected).ppt

Happy to.  It'll have to wait till Monday, though.  That work?

	Rob Bradley
	04/20/2001 05:25 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: FW: Sacramento Pres Final 4_13_01(projected).ppt

Would you mind putting it down on paper so I can give it to Lay?  Just two or
so bullets of the El Paso accusation and then some bullets on the more
fundamental story.

- Rob

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	04/20/2001 05:19 PM

		 To: Rob Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Re: FW: Sacramento Pres Final 4_13_01(projected).ppt

You got it.  Just give me a call and we'll walk through "the other side of
the story."

Best,
Jeff

	Rob Bradley
	04/20/2001 03:17 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: FW: Sacramento Pres Final 4_13_01(projected).ppt

Can I talk you or someone else who is close to this into a one pager on why
a simple supply/demand explanation of California border prices trumps
Carpenter's El Paso dun it conspiracy analysis?

I don't want Lay to be stumped by a question on this at his Wednesday IAEE
talk.

- Rob

----- Forwarded by Rob Bradley/Corp/Enron on 04/20/2001 03:13 PM -----

	Shelley Corman/ENRON@enronXgate
	04/20/2001 02:51 PM

		 To: Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Rob Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: FW: Sacramento Pres Final 4_13_01(projected).ppt

Attached is Paul Carpenter (Brattle Group) preliminary findings that
marketers have market power at the border.

By my second email I'm sending Enron's responses to the pleadings at FERC
which refute the notion of the need to reinstitute price controls at the
California border.

Alternatively, a good argument to high gas prices at the CA border is the
message in Stan's natural gas roundtable speech (i.e. high gas prices can be
directly attributed to supply/demand factors).

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 12:28 PM
To: Fawcett, Jeffery; Harris, Steven; Fossum, Drew; Gomez, Julie A.; Corman,
Shelley; Hartsoe, Joe; Miller, Stephanie; Steffes, James; skean@enron.com;
Robertson, Linda; Shapiro, Richard; Kaufman, Paul; Mara, Susan; McCubbin,
Sandra; Guerrero, Janel; Denne, Karen; mpalmer@enron.com; Novosel, Sarah;
Fulton, Donna; Lawner, Leslie
Subject: Sacramento Pres Final 4_13_01(projected).ppt

FYI.  Presentation by Brattle Group before CA leg committee yesterday in
which they assert market power at the CA border (held by "out-of-state
suppliers") explains high gas prices in California.  If you have any
questions, call me at 415.782.7822.  Please forward to others whom you think
might be interested.  Stephanie, could you forward along to Barry?

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/19/2001 12:23 PM -----

	Douglas.Porter@sce.com 04/19/2001 11:36 AM 	   To: jeff.dasovich@enron.com
cc:   Subject: Sacramento Pres Final 4_13_01(projected).ppt

Per your request, attached are the presentation slides from yesterday.

Douglas Porter, Senior Attorney
Southern California Edison Company
(626)302-3964
(626)302-3990(fax)
douglas.porter@sce.com(See attached file: DRT2486.PPT)
 - DRT2486.PPT


Online Financial Tool StatementOne Has $15 Million Round Two

LAWRENCEVILLE, N.J. -- StatementOne, which provides
brokers, financial advisors, and investors with
data aggregation services and consolidated financial
statements, said it raised $15 million in its second
round of funding. Investors include Boston Ventures
Management, Charterhouse Group  International, Allianz
of America, Desai Capital Management, and Axiom
Venture Partners. The company will use the funds
for software development and to rollout its first
product, an online portal that provides financial
advisors and their clients statements and performance
reports.
http://www.statementone.com/


Jim - I will look into and get back to you.

Tom

-----Original Message-----
From:	Smith,Mike
Sent:	Wednesday, October 31, 2001 7:18 AM
To:	James D Steffes/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON
Cc:	Riley, Tom; Hughes,Evan; Susan J Mara/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON; Jeff Dasovich/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON; Wu,Andrew
Subject:	Re: UC/CSU Customer Complaint -- Quail Ridge Research Station

Sounds like a call for Tom to make.  Let me know if we can help.

From:	James D Steffes/ENRON@enronXgate on 10/30/2001 05:08 PM
To:	Tom Riley/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES
cc:	Susan J Mara/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeff Dasovich/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject:	UC/CSU Customer Complaint -- Quail Ridge Research Station

Tom --

I received a call today from the CPUC (came through the main Enron number) - a CPUC staffer named Joyce at 415-703-2199 (no one was interested in giving the last names).

Someone named Dan at the Quail Ridge Research Station (7001 Hwy 128 Napa, CA 94558) called the CPUC to complain that he was inappropriately switched from PG&E to Enron.  It's a strange situation - the Universities own the bldg and land but a Trust pays the bills.  He says that "the facility isn't anywhere near the campus."

The PG&E account number is ZNL8242005.  His phone number is 503-752-0873.

I told him that we would look into this and get back by end of business Thursday.

The CPUC staffer is Joyce at 415-703-2199 (no one was interested in giving the last names).

My guess is that UC/CSU listed this account on a switch request but didn't ask Dan.  What should we do??

Jim


Knox---thanks for taking the time to consider Felix Todaro's case. I met
Felix 10 years or so ago when he was referred to me through the Houston
Volunteer Lawyers Program. Felix wanted a divorce and custody of his then 6
year old daughter. His wife had a drug problem and he did not think his
daughter would  be safe in her care, After a brief court case, he was awarded
custody of his daughter who is now a student at Deer Park High School. Felix
called me two years ago and asked if I could help him w/ his divorce from his
second wife. Felix tried to go through the HVLP but was over their income
threshold. I asked David Schwab(Elizabeth Dodge' husband) at Bracewell to
handle it as a favor to me. At the time,  Felix had a job at a laundry
company making an hourly fee--- he has since left that job and now works at a
garage making $500(gross) per week. He was unemployed for the first six
months of 2000 and he has no assets. Felix and his second wife had a 2 year
old daughter at the time of his second divorce. Although Felix seriously
considered fighting for custody, he thought his second wife was a good mother
and gave up the fight. Felix was named possessory conservator under his
divorce decree. Felix agreed to pay child support and he tells me he is
current. Shortly after their divorce, his ex-wife asked his permission to
move to Iowa, where her family lived. Felix let her go. He has not seen his
daughter in two years. Last month he heard that his ex-wife was dying of
brain cancer and asked if he could see his daughter in Iowa. His mother in
law denied him access. Last month his ex-wife died. I wrote a letter to the
mother in law  asking for the orderly transfer of the child to Felix. An
attorney called me to inform me that the grandmother would resist. Obviously,
I am not in a position to help Felix, but I was hoping that V&E would take on
his case. Please let me know asap whether you can help.


Hi Jon.

We just spoke on the phone and I work with Ruth Concannon and Maria Garza on the Enron Estate Team.

I'm trying to calculate the demand charge on the following capacity release

Offer #20275
Released to Enserco
Term	4/8/02 to 4/30/02
MDQ	20,0000
demand rate  $1.30

Please call me when you get a chance at 713-853-4743.


Ben:

I reviewed the Tolling Term Sheet sent to Becky on Thursday.  I picked up a
couple of changes/issues that should be changed in our next draft.  See my
readlined version below.

Call me to discuss.

Fred

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Jacoby, Ben
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 8:01 PM
To: 'rtalex@tecoenergy.com'; 'dcturner@tecoenergy.com'
Cc: Mann, Kay; Mitro, Fred
Subject: Draft Tolling Agreement

Please see the attached document.

With respect to a call on Monday to discuss the attached, please advise us
what time in the afternoon works for you.

Regards,

Ben

 << File: Midway TECO Tolling Term sheet (June 7).doc >>


I have rolled deal 506192 thru 1/1/01, priced at Dec HSC Index -.045.

D

Aimee Lannou   01/10/2001 09:23 AM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Meter 1517

Daren - After checking with MIPS, you are correct.  Jan. 1 only flowed 19
dth.  The 5882 dth was a bad estimate.  A better estimate was received on
1/7/00.
Sorry about all the confusion.

AL

---------------------- Forwarded by Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT on 01/10/2001 09:14
AM ---------------------------
Aimee Lannou   01/10/2001 09:00 AM

To: Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Meter 1517

Gary - We did not deliver gas to Phillips on Dec. 1.  Also, I am not sure if
the plant was down, but we did not deliver to them on Dec. 2-4.  If you have
any questions, please let me know.

Aimee

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Gary W Lamphier                           01/10/2001 08:55 AM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Meter 1517

Phillips said we shorted them gas on December 1st so they pulled it on
January 1.  Can we verify that we did not deliver 5,00 on Dec. 1?  If that is
the case and this was a firm sale, we owe him some gas at Dec Index less
(.045).  Which is bad!  Let me know what happened in Dec before I can put
this deal out in Jan.

Daren J Farmer
01/09/2001 02:25 PM
To: Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Meter 1517

Gary,

Have you negotiated a price on this?

D
---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 01/09/2001
02:25 PM ---------------------------
Aimee Lannou   01/02/2001 02:14 PM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Meter 1517

Daren - meter 1517 has a nom of 0/day for Jan.  It flowed about 5.400 on day
1. This is a valid flow.  Could you please extend the deal from Dec. (deal #
506192) or create a new one?  Thanks.

AL


Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 06/14/2001 12:33 PM -----

	"US Publishing" <brice@restructuringtoday.com>
	06/13/2001 11:15 AM
	Please respond to brice

		 To: "RT Reader" <brice@restructuringtoday.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Restructuring Today, Wednesday June 13, 2001

(see attached file:  rt010613.pdf)

Thank you,

Season Hawksley
US Publishing
800-486-8201
202-298-8201
 - rt010613.pdf


We're a client, so I'm assuming internally we have access codes for folks to
use.  I'm trying to get one.  Worry not; I'll track it down.  Thanks very
much for the info.

Best,
Jeff


The Payment status has changed on the following report:

Status last changed by: Marie Wallace
Expense Report Name: emclaughlin42401
Report Total: $78.00
Amount Due Employee: $78.00
Amount Approved: $78.00
Amount Paid: $78.00
Approval Status: Approved
Payment Status: Paid

To review this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://xms.enron.com


Hey fellas!

Just for my records, each of you guys have paid the $20 dues for the
league...here's just a little last bit of info for you.

This is the last week of the regular season...after that comes the
divisional playoffs, followed by the Superbowl.

The same week as the Superbowl, another exciting game will be played for the
first time ever, pitting our 2 worst teams in the league against each other,
hacking it out for bragging rights...THE TOILET BOWL!

Rewards break down:

Superbowl winner:	$125
Runner-up:		$50
Toilet Bowl champ:	$25

Thanks fellas, and get back with me if you are interested in doing a $5
College Bowl sheet against each other...(you know, where you pick the
winners from each bowl game)...we already have a few who are in for this!

-The Commish


Thanks for your nice note.  I certainly follow your career with interest.

I have been meaning to call to tell you how much we enjoyed getting the
wedding picture with your Christmas card.  What a great picture - you look
beautiful and happy.  Meagan and Amanda particularly enjoyed seeing it.  My
best laid plans for Christmas cards became a limited vision this year - only
managed to get them in the mail to people outside of Houston.  Maybe next
year...

I am in your old stomping grounds this week -- London.  I will see Mo
tomorrow night for dinner and to catch up on her life.

See you next week!  --Sally


---------------------- Forwarded by Jane M Tholt/HOU/ECT on 08/23/2000 12:18
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Donnie Myers @ ENRON                           08/23/2000 11:16 AM

To: Jane M Tholt/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Socal - Deal #151617 for July '00

Janie,

 I have been talking with EES and they have confirmed their volumes for their
purchases from ENA (I believe that it is Zarin who comfirmed their volumes on
their side).  I need you to confirm and verify our volumes and to change them
(or contact who can change them) if needed.  I am trying to get EES to pay us
for these transactions and they will not if they do not agree.  The amount
that we are talking about is over $10 mil.  Could you please look at this so
that I can get this resolved today?  The following shows what we are out:

Please let me know what you find out.  Thanks...


There are some Las Vegas Delight True Beef Steak tomatoes available by Jody's
desk.

I wouldn't recommend taking ANY of them, as I'm sure they don't taste very
good. (Yeah, right!)

Tomatoes are available in limited quantity, so come and get it!

*NOTE* If you get a tomato that is somewhat green, that means it's probably
not good. You can put it on my desk and I'll take care of it. =o)
OR, you can keep it on your counter for a day or two and it'll be ripe and
ready to go! (I recommend doing the first thing...)


THIS DOCUMENT IS BEING SENT ON BEHALF OF VINSON & ELKINS L.L.P.

GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS UPDATE

Bush Administration Issues Interim Rule Suspending Clinton Administration
"Blacklisting" Rule; Issues Proposed Rule Permanently Revoking Clinton Rule
and Reinstating Former Contractor Responsibility Provisions<?xml:namespace
prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />

On December 20, 2000, the Clinton Administration issued a final rule
addressing contractor responsibility which took effect on January 19, 2001.
65 Fed. Reg. 80256 (Dec. 20, 2000) (the "Clinton rule").  Federal agencies
are required to award contracts to "responsible" sources and contracting
officers are required to determine whether prospective contractors are
responsible before awarding federal contracts.  The Clinton rule addressed
the procedures to be employed by a contracting officer in arriving at a
responsibility determination and under what circumstances contracting
officers may disqualify companies from contracting with the federal
government.  The rule was extremely controversial and was effectively
overturned on April 3, 2001 by the Bush Administration, in a move that has
been described as a rebuff to organized labor and a nod to business.

Provisions of the Clinton Rule

?        The Clinton rule included a number of notable provisions:

o       Added language stating that a "satisfactory record of integrity and
business ethics" included compliance with the law, including (for the first
time) tax, labor and employment, environmental, antitrust, and consumer
protection laws.

o       Required contracting officers to consider all relevant credible
information, although the rule included guidelines for considering various
types of violations.

o       Expanded the scope of a pre-award contractor certification to
require offerors to certify to additional violations (violations of tax,
labor and employment, environmental, antitrust and consumer protection laws)
adjudicated within the last three years.

?        Although the rule contained certain procedural safeguards and had
its supporters, the rule was widely assailed by business groups and even by
some government officials for its broad scope.

Strong Criticism of the Clinton Rule

?        Businesses argued that the broad scope of the new regulations could
be used by contracting officers to improperly "blacklist" contractors from
doing business with the federal government.  Detractors argued that under
the new rule, a contractor could technically be disqualified based on (among
other things) a relatively insignificant violation of law that did not
reasonably reflect the contractor's record of integrity or business ethics
or even based on unproven allegations set forth in civil or administrative
complaints by third parties, such as labor unions.

?        Businesses also expressed concern about a contractor's ability to
comply with the new certification requirement.

?        The Federal Acquisition Regulation ("FAR") Council admitted that
the rule generated "strong controversy".  According to the FAR Council, the
proposed rules generated 1,800 public comments (the typical FAR rule
generates only about 1% of that amount) and after the final rule was issued,
the FAR Council continued to receive negative comments.  The Business
Roundtable, Chamber of Commerce, National Association of Manufacturers,
Associated General Contractors of America, Inc., and Associated Builders and
Contractors, Inc. even filed a lawsuit seeking to overturn the final rule.

The Bush Administration Responds

?        In response to enormous pressure, the FAR Council published an
interim rule which stayed the Clinton rule and reinstated the FAR text as it
existed prior to January 19, 2001 (although an arcane requirement of the
federal register requires that the stayed text retains its numbering and the
restored text is renumbered accordingly).  66 Fed. Reg. 17754 (Apr. 3,
2001).  The FAR Council provided in the interim rule that the stay will last
for 270 days from April 3, 2001 or until finalization of a proposed rule
that was concurrently published with the interim rule.

?        The proposed rule permanently revokes the Clinton rule and restores
the original FAR text.  66 Fed. Reg. 17758 (Apr. 3, 2001).

?        In both notices, the FAR Council indicated that it was
reconsidering its position and reassessing the advantages and disadvantages
of the December 20, 2000 rule.  The FAR Council noted that it was not clear
whether there is justification for including the added categories of covered
laws in the rule and its implementing certifications, whether the rule
provides sufficient guidelines to prevent arbitrary or otherwise abusive
implementation or whether the final rule is justified from a cost benefit
perspective.  The FAR Council also determined that the 30-day effective date
did not give contractors and the Government sufficient time to meet the new
obligations and responsibilities imposed by the new rule.  The FAR Council
noted that the final rule has only been effect since January 19, 2001 and
there has not been time for the public to be in a position of reliance upon
the rule's existence.

?        Written comments related to the interim and proposed rules must be
submitted on or before June 4, 2001 to be considered.

If you have any questions about the new rules, please contact Michael
Charness at (202) 639-6780, Kathleen Little at (202) 639-6663, David Johnson
at (202) 639-6706 or Suzanne Reifman at (202) 639-6577.

++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.  This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system.  Thank You


We still have CGLF and CGAS contracts showing up as CES and Columbia Market
in Navigator.  Scott and I will look at contracts 42789, 63115, and 66278.
Please let Scott know if you need any of the remaining contracts moved over
to ENRON N A.

Thanks.


Mark

FYI

Justin

---------------------- Forwarded by Justin Boyd/LON/ECT on 01/09/2000 12:57
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Murton, Rachel" <rachel.murton@linklaters.com>
   01/09/2000 12:43

To: "'justin.boyd@enron.com'" <justin.boyd@enron.com>,
"'dave.samuels@enron.com'" <dave.samuels@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Enron Online Game advice

PLease see below for the consolidated gaming advice from the various
European jurisdictions:

1 List of countries where employees of Enron's customers can play the
game and be awarded prizes ("approved countries"):
 UK (because the participants do not pay to enter, the game is not in
public, and the game is not promoting Enron's business);
 Germany (because the participants do not pay to enter, and provided
the game is only advertised to existing customers and is not used as a
marketing tool);
 Austria (because the participants do not pay to enter, and provided
the game is only advertised to existing customers and is not used as a
marketing tool);
 Switzerland (because the participants do not need to pay to enter);
 Finland (because the participants do not need to pay to participate,
the game is not used as a promotional tool and Enron as a foreign organiser
do not have tax liabilities to the Finnish government);
 Portugal (because participants do not pay to enter and the game is
run outside Portugal);
 Poland (because participants do not pay to enter and the game is not
used as a promotional tool, and assuming that Enron have objective means of
determining who can and cannot become an online customer).  The Polish
lawyers would like me to confirm this latter point to them - I await this
confirmation (requested from Mark Taylor).
2 List of countries where there are risks involved if Enron's
customers can play the game and be awarded prizes:
 Belgium
 It is unclear whether the game is a lottery (these require special
authorisation in order not to be unlawful) or a contest (usually allowable)
under Belgium law.  The game has been submitted to the Belgium regulators
(who decide this classification) but a response has not yet been received.
There seems quite a low risk that the game would be classified as a lottery
because an element of skill is involved, but there is still a risk that the
authorities would be of the opinion that the element of skill was not
adequate to "move" the game from a lottery classification to a contest
classification.  It does not matter that there is no charge - the scheme
could still be classified as a lottery.
 Organising an unauthorised lotteries may give rise to criminal,
civil and administrative sanctions, including imprisonment from 8 days to 3
months and a fine of BEF 10,000 to BEF 600,000 (approximately EU 250 to EU
15,000).
 Netherlands
 Under the Dutch Games of Chance, games of chance are generally
prohibited, even if participation is free.  It is not clear whether or not
the Dutch Games of Chance Act applies to internet games or whether the Dutch
authorities would consider that they had jurisdiction over the game, because
the server is based in the US and the site is in English.  Contravention of
the Dutch Games of Chance Act can have criminal sanctions - maximum fine of
NLG 25,000.
 Norway
 The outstanding issue (providing the game is not a promotional tool)
is tax.  If a Norwegian resident wins a prize, Enron would need to pay
social security contributions of 14.1% (plus an extra 12.5% if the employee
concerned earns more than NOK 750,000).  Enron will be responsible for
reporting the prize to the tax authorities and to withold the tax from the
payment to the winner.
 Sweden
 It is possible that the game could be considered a lottery in Sweden
- it doesn't matter that there is no fee to enter, all that is needed is for
the public to be offered the chance to win prizes based on chance.
Authorisation to run a lottery is virtually never given unless the lottery
is for a charitable purpose.
 The Swedish lottery board consider that the target number in
deciding whether a lottery is public or not is 250.  However, the courts are
apparantly not bound to accept this figure, and case law suggests that it is
the relationship between the participants that is key - games that have not
been found to be lotteries are those organised amongst a private
circle/"apparent community" i.e. a fan club.  Our Swedish lawyers believe
that there is at least a chance that being employees of [presumably various]
Swedish customers of Enron would not constitute an "apparent community" in
the opinion of the court.  Arranging an unlawful lottery can be considered a
criminal offence, punishable by a fine or a maximum of 6 months
imprisonment.
 Denmark
 On line competitions are subject to the Danish Marketing Practices
Act and effectively require authorisation from the Danish Consumer Ombudsman
to ensure that they meet the standard of "good marketing practice".  Our
Danish lawyers have contacted the Ombudsman, but have not yet received a
response.
 Italy
 The game is more than likely an advertising contest under Italian
law and therefore needs approval of the Italian Ministry of Finance.
Approval has not yet been requested (because I do not have the complete name
and address of any of the Italian subsidiaries of Enron who the application
would need to be made on behalf of).  It is uncertain that the Italian
authorities would consider themselves to have jurisdiction over the game
because the server is in the US and the site is in English.  We are also
advised that the Italian Ministry of Finance does not routinely undertake
regular or thorough searches of the internet to identify potentially
unlawful advertising contests.  There is a fine of approx. 7,500 USD for
failure to obtain authorisation, and continuing an unauthorised game can
result in a fine of up to 50,000 USD.
 Spain
 The preliminary opinion of our Spanish lawyers was that the game may
raise issues under consumer protection law in Spain. I have not yet received
a more substantive opinion from them.
 France
 The game more than likely contravenes French lottery law because
spending additional time on the internet can constitute a charge (this has
been confirmed by the appropriate authority).  There was a possibility that
the game could run if ISP costs were reimbursed to the participants, but
Leslie Hansen has already indicated to me that this is not feasible.

3 List of countries where employees of Enron's customers can play the
game provided they are excluded from being awarded a prizes.
 Belgium (please note the comments given in the context of the Euro
2000 game that there is an evidential risk that "internet disclaimers" may
not be effective because they do not constitute  written proof of the terms
of a contract).
 Netherlands
 Norway
 Sweden
 Italy
 I have still not received conclusive advice as to whether it is just
residents of these jurisdictions that need to be excluded from winning
prizes or whether anyone playing the game from terminals in these
jurisdictions who isn't necessarily resident in that country (for example,
whilst they are at work at the site of an Enron customer) needs to be
excluded as well.  For safety, I would suggest that it is a condition of the
game that participants who reside in a country where prizes can be awarded
are told that they need to access the game only from that jurisdiction, (or
from another of the "approved jurisdictions").  It should be made clear that
participants forfeit their right to a prize if they do not abide by this
rule.
 In all these countries, the fact that residents etc of these
countries cannot be awarded prizes should be stated clearly and specifically
in the rules so as to avoid accusations that Enron is misleading
participants into believing that they can win a prize.
4 List of countries where there are doubts that even excluding
residents of that country from winning prizes would make the game lawful
 Spain - we have not received advice on this point
 Denmark - because it is consumer legislation, and not lotteries
legislation, that is at issue, preventing participants from winning prizes
may well not be enough to avoid liability under Danish law.
 France - our French lawyers were particularly concerned about how
people could be prevented from playing the game from France - and I have not
yet heard back from them that the measures I set out in paragraph 3 above
satisfy their concerns.
 In these countries, we have been advised that a disclaimer stating
that residents of that country are ineligible to play the game, coupled with
a registration process preventing residents of those countries from
participating, should be enough to prevent Enron from being liable for
breach of the relevant laws.
5 Miscellaneous issues
 Germany - if employees of Enron are allowed to play the game in
Germany (regardless of whether or not they are able to win prizes) then the
works council of Enron's German subsidiary will need to be informed about
the intended game and will need expressly to grant their consent.

____________________________________________________________

This message is confidential. It may also be privileged or
otherwise protected by work product immunity or other legal
rules. If you have received it by mistake please let us know
by reply and then delete it from your system; you should not
copy the message or disclose its contents to anyone.
____________________________________________________________


I have place the amendment with your revisions and ours with my attorney for
review.  Hopefully  I will receive it back today.   In Section 4.2 we
increased the event for Enron Corp. to 100m and Idacorp, Inc. to 50 m.  In
addition to this I changed the date of the Amendment to July 1, 2000, changed
the name to reflect Enron North America Corp. and finally to Section 4.6 the
following: Collateral Requirement/Termination Threshold is hereby amended by
the addition thereto after the last sentence: "For purposes of this Section
4.6, the calculation of "Early Termination Payment" shall include all amounts
owed but not yet paid by one Party whether or not such amounts are then due,
for performance already provided pursuant to any and all Transactions."

These are the only changes we have made.  Pending my attorney's review we
should be ready.  I will e-mail the new version as soon as I receive it.

Thanks for your assistance, and have a great weekend.
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Ok thanks Mary.   I was wondering if it had been paid since the invoice has an "accounts payable" stamp.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Grisaffi, Mary
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 3:29 PM
To:	Furey, Denise; Herndon, Rogers; Ogenyi, Gloria
Cc:	Steffes, James D.; Kingerski, Harry; Richter, Jeff; Sharp, Vicki; Ring, Richard
Subject:	RE: Bond Requirement

Denise, I have spoken to Richard Ring and Gloria Ogenyi, they assured me that it would be taken care of.  Thanks for your attention to the matter!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Furey, Denise
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 3:20 PM
To:	Herndon, Rogers; Ogenyi, Gloria
Cc:	Grisaffi, Mary; Steffes, James D.; Kingerski, Harry; Richter, Jeff; Sharp, Vicki
Subject:	RE: Bond Requirement

Mary, who told you we would not pay for this bond?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Herndon, Rogers
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 2:44 PM
To:	Ogenyi, Gloria
Cc:	Grisaffi, Mary; Steffes, James D.; Kingerski, Harry; Furey, Denise; Richter, Jeff; Sharp, Vicki
Subject:	Bond Requirement

Gloria -

Could you please help us gather the facts on what the $12 MM Surety Bond currently being requested (#6131506) is for - is this PG&E?.  Mary informed me that funds ($36,000) may not be available, is this correct?

It is my understanding that Credit, Services and Regulatory will be monitoring and processing bond requirements.  As such, I would like to know how this would impact EES' business and definitely want to be aware of any default situation prior to reading about it in the press.

Thanks,
Rogers


Statute of Limitations
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Outlook-Migration-Team </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=EXCHMIGTEAM>
X-To:
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \ESAGER (Non-Privileged)\Calendar
X-Origin: SAGER-E
X-FileName: ESAGER (Non-Privileged).pst

Jennifer Stevenson and 2 staff members


Judge orders Enron to deliver electricity to universities

Updated: April 11, 2001 - 2:06 p.m.
SAN FRANCISCO -- Saying that Enron Energy Systems Inc. may be in breach of
contract, a federal judge Wednesday ordered the Houston company to abide by
its agreement to sell cheap power to the state's public universities.

Enron was attempting to get out of delivering power for the final year of a
four-year deal with the California State University and University of
California systems.

Enron, which buys power from producers and sells it on the market, said the
contract would cost the energy concern $12 million a month because of
skyrocketing wholesale power prices.

Enron said the state should free Enron from its obligation and taxpayers
should pick up the tab.

"It's our economic interest to provide a service with the least amount of
dollars we can provide it for," Enron attorney A. William Urquhart said. He
later described the case as being "all about money. It's all about money."

Enron said it would file an emergency appeal to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of
Appeals in San Francisco to overturn U.S. District Judge Phyllis Hamilton's
ruling in the suit brought by the state's two university systems.

Appearing in federal court, state Attorney General Bill Lockyer argued that
Enron wants out of the contract so it can engage in a "marketing game" with
the universities' promised power and sell it on the open market for 10 times
more than what the electricity cost Enron.

He said lawmakers may have "left the keys in the car" when they approved
California's failed energy deregulation scheme that has prompted the energy
crisis, "But it is still theft to steal the car."

The judge issued a temporary injunction against Enron, forcing it to continue
providing service as the suit brought by the universities proceeds. When the
judge issued the order, she also said there is a likelihood Enron will lose
the suit.

"I am persuaded, in the end, there is a very strong likelihood of success on
the breach of contract claim," the judge said.

UC's annual electric bill is about $87 million and its natural gas bill is
about $26 million. CSU annually pays about $40 million for electricity and
$20 million for natural gas.

The case is UC Regents vs. Enron Energy Systems Inc., 01-1006.

-- Associated Press


Kathy,

I am attaching a copy of the NGPL that was reported as of this morning.  If
you look at the by Trader P&L, we are off from your spreadsheet by
approximately $3.6 million USD for December and approximately $7.6million
year to date.  The $7.6 consists of the December variance and the $4 million
variance that we discussed earlier (originations).  However, I spoke with the
Chris Able from the Controls group, what we are reporting for originations
and for Canadian p&l ties to the DPR.   This leads me to believe that either
our number already includes the origination adjustment or the origination
adjustment was never made to the DPR.  To help resolve the December variance,
I have added a tab to your file to show what we have reported each day for
December.

Remember the p&l we are reporting by trader excludes originations.  Give me a
call when you have time and we can try to resolve these variances.

Thanks,
Robin

Kathy Reeves
12/07/2000 06:46 PM
To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Canada p&l

Robin
I would like to make sure before year end that the p&l being reporting for
Canada ( trading profits only) equals what I think it is as per attached:

Would you let me know what you are currently reporting for Canada.

Thanks
Kathy


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron on 12/11/2000
04:35 PM ---------------------------

	From:  John R Keller                           12/08/2000 02:35 PM

To: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Phil Lowry/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Jerry D
Martin/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: GALLUP COST ESTIMATE

Steve/Lorraine:

As promised, attached below is the "Level B" estimate for expanding Gallup
10mmcf/d.  Please let me know if you have any questions.

John
---------------------- Forwarded by John R Keller/OTS/Enron on 12/08/2000
02:30 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Ben Asante                           12/08/2000 02:28 PM

To: John R Keller/OTS/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: GALLUP COST ESTIMATE

John,
I am forwarding the Level B estimate for the Gallup modification. This
involves increasing the horsepower output (from 12,000  to 15,000 HP drive)at
the station
with a consequent flow increase of 10mmcfd.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
thanks
ben
---------------------- Forwarded by Ben Asante/ET&S/Enron on 12/08/2000 03:23
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Earl Chanley                           12/07/2000 04:50 PM

To: Ben Asante/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: GALLUP COST ESTIMATE

---------------------- Forwarded by Earl Chanley/ET&S/Enron on 12/07/2000
04:59 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Earl Chanley                           12/07/2000 03:27 PM

To: JERRY MARTIN/ENRON@enronxgate
cc: Norm Spalding/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Arnold L
Eisenstein/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: GALLUP COST ESTIMATE

THERE WERE CHANGES IN DOLLARS DUE TO THE TESTING COMPLETED LAST WEEK. THE
COMPRESSOR WHEEL
IS ADEQUATE FOR CONDITIONS BUT IF PRESSURE CHANGES   WHEEL OR CASE MAY
REQUIRE ATTENTION AT THAT TIME.
THE DRIVE NEEDS TO DEVELOP 13,000 H.P.  AND WITH A SERVICE FACTOR OF 1.2, A
15,OOO H.P. DRIVE IS RECOMMENDED.


Here it is.
PL


Please note that my new e-mail address, effective February 1, 2002, will be     Bob.Burleson@Dynegy.com

Thanks, Bob


Susan:
I would like to talk to you briefly next week sometime about what in your
opinion would be the best way to train the new legal assistant that we plan
to hire.  In particular, could you give some thought as to what worked the
best for you and what didn't work.   I will keep whatever you say
confidential.  I also have discussed with Mark that I want you to play a
significant role in the training process given the outstanding progress that
you have made in the last year.  Could you also give that some thought and
let me know what you think?  Thanks.
Carol


Hey guys,

We need to try and get this populated today and distributed.  Can each of you please take a look at the assigned section and let me know your comments.  The only thing we are trying to do here is identify the activities of the Estate and what needs to be performed by the resources in each group.

Cara & Mike will you please update the scheduling and trading areas?

Stacey, will you please update the risk area?

I will work on the settlements / volume Management and I will work with Dave Steiner on the IT section.

Thanks so much for everyone's help.  I'm sorry I'm out of the office today.  We really need to get this done ASAP to help management understand who is available to assist in this time of transition.

Thanks - MO

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	O'Neil, Murray P.
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 6:28 PM
To:	May, Tom
Cc:	Hall, Bob M; Miller, Don (Asset Mktg)
Subject:	Portland Office Activities, Options  and Needs

Tom,

After our call today Mike Purcell and I spent a little time talking.  We also have some time schedule to Cara and Jeff Richter tomorrow  I have put together the attached  template which I will hopefully have filled out for you by tomorrow afternoon.

Our biggest concern today was how we would address the Real-Time scheduling requirements.  Mark Guzman is part of the estate and should be able to cover the day shift during the week and we can outsource to UBS to cover all the other shifts (Just a proposal).  In addition, Lester Rawson is part of the estate and has Real-Time experience and is also the individual who currently manages the El Paso obligations.

If you have any questions please give me a call @ 503-702-9846.

Thanks - MO


-----Original Message-----
From: Weaver Paul Civ 95 CEG/CEOEE [mailto:Leo.Weaver@edwards.af.mil]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 5:06 PM
To: Emanuel Gregory G LtCol 95 CES/CC
Cc: Choi, Paul
Subject: FW: EAFB PDA Additional Energy Scheduling Changes
Importance: High

Sir, info, Paul

-----Original Message-----
From: Raymond.Haug@sce.com [mailto:Raymond.Haug@sce.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 3:39 PM
To: leo.weaver@edwards.af.mil
Cc: John.King@sce.com; DAYNEDG@sce.com; Thomas.Watson@sce.com;
Preschedule@sce.com
Subject: EAFB PDA Additional Energy Scheduling Changes
Importance: High

Paul,

As I indicated in my follow-up call this afternoon, the following procedure
should be used to make any scheduling changes to the Basic WAPA Allocation,
Excess Energy, or Additional Energy during the month in which a monthly
preschedule was agreed by the parties (prior to the beginning of the
month).

   1. Contact the SCE Day Ahead Prescheduling line at:  626-302-3320
        and inform them of the Scheduling Change and that the change will
   be confirmed via FAX or e-mail.

   2. Send a confirmation note with the Scheduling Change via FAX to:
   626-302-3213, or via email at:   presched@sce.com

As we have indicated in prior communications, Edwards will be assessed an
Additional Scheduling and Dispatch (AS&D) charge (currently $131.00) for
each change that is made to any of the Schedules.  This charge is in
addition to the daily Scheduling and Dispatch charge of $131.00 per day for
each delivery point (Mead, Blythe, and SP-15) where energy is scheduled for
delivery to SCE.

Please communicate this procedure to the Enron and WAPA energy scheduling
folks.

Please let me know if you have any further questions.

****************************************************************************
**************************************************************

Ray Haug, Project Manager
CSBU Technical Support
626-302-1829


Jeff
?
I am increasingly asked to pronounce on California  all over the world, and
have in process a piece at present, stimulated by the  various statements
from Borenstein, Teece et al, Ruff etc.? I do wish we  had had a chance to
talk during my visit.? I wonder whether you have any  papers, by yourselves
or others, that express Enron's perspective on all  this.? The reported
proposals to get the state into ownership and trading  seem most unhelpful to
competition.
Regards
Stephen


John -

In discussing a bit further with our business people the basis for the NDA, I
understand it is solely in relation to the disclosure of financial
information to Enron for access to EnronOnline.  Accordingly, I have inserted
the necessary topic for disclosure, redefined "Project" to be "Discussions"
and deleted the provisions of Paragraph 19 as to the accuracy and validity of
the confidential information.  Since Enron will be relying on your financials
to make a credit based decision, it makes no sense for the language of
Paragraph 19 to be in the agreement.

Please review the attached.  If acceptable, please have two originals signed
and forward one via fax to my attention.  We will arrange for
countersignature.  The originals should also be forwarded for
countersignature and subsequent distribution for file retention.

Thanks for your continued assistance and patience.

Mark
Senior Counsel, EWS
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3490
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com

	"Gray, John" <John.Gray@GreenMountain.com>
	06/05/2001 03:30 PM

		 To: "'Mark.Greenberg@enron.com'" <Mark.Greenberg@enron.com>
		 cc: "Smith, Tim (BP)" <smithtm6@bp.com>
		 Subject: RE: Green Mountain NDA

Thanks.

These changes are acceptable.   Once you have the project discription,
please send me a final version and I'll coordinate with Tim Smith in our
Houston offices to get two originals signed.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark.Greenberg@enron.com [mailto:Mark.Greenberg@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 4:26 PM
To: john.gray@greenmountain.com
Cc: Adriane.Schultea@enron.com; Tana.Jones@enron.com
Subject: Greenmountain NDA

John -

Following-up on our conversation of Friday, I have attached a copy of your
proposed NDA marked to reflect Enron's comments.  I have left the
description of the "Project" blank for now as I am waiting confirmation
from our business personnel of the exact language they would prefer to use.
In the meantime, please take a look at the attached and let me know your
thoughts.

Thanks.

(See attached file: nda-greenmountain(enroncomments6-04-01).doc)

Mark
Senior Counsel, EWS
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3490
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com


I am being told that FirstEnergy Services Corp. is the successor by merger to
First Energy Trading Services Inc.  I do not have any documentation
reflecting this merger.  Do you?


FYI
FERC staff are visiting the Enron power trading operation this Thursday and
having lunch with Jeff Skilling.  Expected attendees are Dan Larcamp, Scott
Miller, Fernanda Young, Tom Herlihy, and Charles Whitmore.  Thought you might
be interested in EPMI's talking points.

Agenda and list of participants

Enron INTERNAL talking points


Comments from a Swedish scholar:
>
> 1. Imagine that we read of an election occurring anywhere in the third
> world in which the self-declared winner was the son of the former prime
> minister and that former prime minister was himself the former head of
> that nation's secret police (cia).
>
> 2. Imagine that the self-declared winner lost the popular vote but won
> based on some old colonial holdover (electoral college) from the
> nation's pre-democracy past.
>
> 3. Imagine that the self-declared winner's 'victory' turned on disputed
> votes cast in a province governed by his brother!
>
> 4. Imagine that the poorly drafted ballots of one district, a district
> heavily favoring the self-declared winner's opponent, led thousands of
> voters to vote for the wrong candidate.
>
> 5. Imagine that that members of that nation's most despised caste,
> fearing for their lives/livelihoods, turned out in record numbers to
> vote in near-universal opposition to the self-declared winner's
> candidacy.
>
> 6. Imagine that hundreds of members of that most-despised caste were
> intercepted on their way to the polls by state police operating under
> the authority of the self-declared winner's brother.
>
> 7. Imagine that six million people voted in the disputed province and
> that the self-declared winner's 'lead' was only 327 votes. Fewer,
> certainly, than the vote counting machines' margin of error.
>
> 8. Imagine that the self-declared winner and his political party opposed
>
> a more careful by-hand inspection and re- counting of the ballots in the
>
> disputed province or in its most hotly disputed district.
>
> 9. Imagine that the self-declared winner, himself a governor of a major
> province, had the worst human rights record of any province in his
> nation and actually led the nation in executions.
>
> 10. Imagine that a major campaign promise of the self- declared winner
> was to appoint like-minded human rights violators to lifetime positions
> on the high court of that nation.
>
> None of us would deem such an election to be representative of anything
> other than the self-declared winner's will-to- power. All of us, I
> imagine, would wearily turn the page thinking that it was another sad
> tale of pitiful pre- or anti-democracy peoples in some strange
> elsewhere."
>


Here's TURN's reply.

At 04:39 PM 07/31/2000 -0700, Louie, Stephanie wrote:
>   Attached is the Reply Brief of Pacific Gas  and Electric Company filed
>today in I.99-07-003.   Stephanie Louie Secretary to EDWARD  KURZ
>Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\reply-f.doc"
 - TURN GIR Reply Brief.doc


Gina Bess
632 Sheridan Drive
Lexington, KY 40503
Gina.Bess@mail.state.ky.us

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Gina Bess


judy,
Please put this into a word document.
Thanks,
Ccg

Judy Hernandez
11/01/2000 02:33 PM
To: Carolyn Gilley/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark D Thorne/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: ACCOMPLISMENTS

HERE ARE MY ACCOMPLISMENTS FROM JUNE OF
2000.
          I HAVE TRACKED AT LEAST 40,000 DOCUMENTS IN THE TAGG DEAL CLEARING
DATABASE.     THIS INCLUDES GAS, POWER, AND SITARA DOCUMENTS.
                                                              I SEPERATE AND
DISTRIBUTE ALL INCOMING PAPER FROM OUR INCOMING PRINTER.                   I
HAVE FAXED OUT AT LEAST 5,000 LIQUIDS DOCUMENTS AND M-DEAL DOCUMENTS.
            I HAVE ENTERED AT LEAST 5,000 DOCUMENTS INTO THE LIVELINK
DATABASE.
                                   I HAVE ASSISSTED THE RESEARCH OF VARIOUS
LISTS OF GAS AND POWER DOCUMENTS IN ORDER TO UPDATE THE STATUS OF THESE
DOCUMENTS.
        I HAVE ALSO TRAINED FOUR EMPLOYEES IN THE VARIOUS DATABASES SUCH AS
TAGG, DECAF II, LIVELINK, ASCENT, AND ENCOPY, AND ALSO TRAINING OF USING OUR
FAX
MACHINES.


Just a note to let you know that CBS SportLine.com's Fantasy
Basketball 2001 and Basketball Commissioner are both on-line.

FANTASY BASKETBALL 2001 - Presented by Honda
http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/87/fantasybbNUM2102301.cgi
* The best game for those looking to join a league and
  compete for great prizes.
* Stats and standings updated daily; reports available
  via e-mail or wireless.
* Each team gets a private web site, including tons of
  scouting reports and fantasy analysis.
* This year, $150 goes to the champion of every Fantasy
  Basketball GOLD league.

BASKETBALL COMMISSIONER - Presented by Honda
http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/87/fantasybb102301.cgi
* The best league management and stats service to run
  an existing league, or start a private league on-line.
* You make all the rules for scoring, drafting, playoffs,
  prizes and more.
* We calculate all the stats and standings for you.
* We give you all the tools you need, including tons of
  statistics, scouting reports and analysis.
* Enjoy great perks with Commissioner GOLD

---------------------------------------------------------------------
This message has been provided free of charge and free of obligation.
If you prefer not to receive emails of this nature please send an
email to remove@commissioner.com.  Do not respond to this email
directly.

This message was sent to: martin.cuilla@enron.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------


We only took 80% of what we could, so we can increase by Market Zone delivery,
or not. We have advised any new buyer of the options and are keeping them
informed if we are forced to make a move, as in the case of the 15,000 of
capacity on TCO. We are being conservative and keeping everyone informed.

Chris.Germany@enron.com on 06/20/2000 04:59:21 PM
Please respond to Chris.Germany@enron.com

To: Jeffrey Porter/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS
cc: Scott.Goodell@enron.com
Subject: Re: CGAS Storage

How big of an adjustment can you make as a percentage and are you guys
looking at that adjustment?   OR, are you letting the buyer know this
option exists and you just hope its not your problem by then (that's my
guess)?

jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com on 06/20/2000 02:53:42 PM

To:   " - *Chris.Germany@enron.com" <Chris.Germany@enron.com>
cc:   " - *Scott.Goodell@enron.com" <Scott.Goodell@enron.com>
Subject:  Re: CGAS Storage

Yes, we can adjust by 10/15. If we add, must pay retro to 4/1 and if
reduce, we
may not get any $ back.

Chris.Germany@enron.com on 06/20/2000 02:13:20 PM
Please respond to Chris.Germany@enron.com

To: Jeffrey Porter/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS
cc: Scott.Goodell@enron.com
Subject: CGAS Storage

Does CES have the ability to adjust the storage MSQ in Sep or Oct?


Hi

I'm thrilled you are also speaking at ISDA.Thanks

Any chance you can hit on Wed? If not we may have to resume our REGULAR
WEEKLY SCHEDULE after the holidays.  Let me know.


Stephanie,

Please find attached a revised credit worksheet for Boeing with the
collateral threshold matrix referring to "ENA" rather than "EPMI".

Sorry for the confusion, please call with questions.

Wendy


Kay,

I have an outline attached.....a bit of a road map with a few thoughts.  I am
also sending up the markup I have completed so far.  See what you think.
Fairley and Ozzie are out of pocket today so we won't get any comments from
them today.

I need to give Marvin and company an idea of when we will be able to get them
something.  Wehn do you think we will be ready to give them our first draft??

Thank you--

Reagan

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mann, Kay
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 10:41 AM
To: Rorschach, Reagan
Subject: RE: MDEA

I don't really like the organization of it much.  I think things need to be
moved around and re-organized.

From: Reagan Rorschach/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/05/2001 10:08 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: RE: MDEA

Kay,

I have gone through the first 37 pgs and landed on the Energy Mgmt Svcs Agmt
when it occured to me that I really could use an education on the contract
structure.  So I am backing up to outline the doc(s) to see how everything
fits.  Call me when you get a few minutes...I need a lesson.

Thanks,

Reagan

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mann, Kay
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 8:37 AM
To: Rorschach, Reagan
Subject: RE: MDEA

Well, don't get too excited until you read it.  There's lots of stuff I just
had to put place holders on, but we'll get it all filled in.

Kay

From: Reagan Rorschach/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/05/2001 08:29 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: RE: MDEA

Wow!  This is big.....remarkable effort.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mann, Kay
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 8:14 AM
To: Rorschach, Reagan; Fairley, David
Subject: MDEA

Here's a starting point.  I've tried to bracket stuff with open issues like
this [ ], but I'm sure there are more questions than [ ]s.  I'm really
unclear on the financial aspect of the deal.

 << File: MDEA ESMA (Mann4-3 Draft).doc >>

Reagan, I didn't stop to put the exhibits you sent in, as I thought it was
better to get the doc in your hands (and Mr. Fairley's) for a detailed review.

Kay


Teco Tap       150.000 / HPL Gas Daily


In addition to a summary of DWR's long-term contracts and the pages of the
contracts that were formerly censored, Connell's site now has copies of the
consulting contracts:

http://www.sco.ca.gov/power_page/consulting_contracts.htm