Lee Clarke... Sounds like a fag. Garrison woods that is the place my mom was talking about. Do you live near there?

 -----Original Message----- [Dorland, Chris]
From: 	Rob Laird <RLaird@natsource.ca>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, August 09, 2001 9:39 AM
To:	Dorland, Chris
Subject:	RE:

Nice brownstones in garrison woods, the remodeled area of altadore, that
area offers lots of options from apartment condo's to houses to townhouses
etc. Kerri? Haven't seen here for a while, hear she is pretty serious with a
guy named Lee Clarke....

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris.Dorland@enron.com [mailto:Chris.Dorland@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 8:35 AM
To: RLaird@natsource.ca
Subject: RE:

I really want to live in Altadore. I hear that is where all the fly bitches
hang. I don't know to be honest Killarney / Altadore / West Hillhurst ?
Close to downtown. I am thinking infill / townhouse. My mom has a friend
who says there are nice brownstone townhomes in Altadore. I am thinking of
checking those out. I am looking for minimal maintenance. Do you have any
ideas? Seen Kerri Murray lately?

CD

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   Rob Laird <RLaird@natsource.ca>@ENRON
   Sent:   Thursday, August 09, 2001 8:39 AM
   To:     Dorland, Chris
   Subject:  RE:

   Where do you want to live, which area, condo/house?

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Chris.Dorland@enron.com [mailto:Chris.Dorland@enron.com]
   Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 2:49 PM
   To: RLaird@natsource.ca
   Subject: RE:

   Actually lots. Keep this on the QT for now but this kid is moving back
   to
   cow town. I'll be in town next week shopping for somewhere to live. Just
   in
   time for ski season.

   Later

   Chris

       -----Original Message-----
      From:   Rob Laird <RLaird@natsource.ca>@ENRON
      Sent:   Wednesday, August 08, 2001 2:56 PM
      To:     Dorland, Chris
      Subject:

      What up dog?

   **********************************************************************
   This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
   and
   may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
   intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
   others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
   authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
   reply
   to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
   all
   copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
   intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence
   a
   binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
   affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
   be
   relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
   Thank you.
   **********************************************************************


I want the hotel for the night of the 31st.  Thank you.  Scott and I have
flights leaving on the 30th and returning on the 2nd.  Yipeeee!!!

Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
cameron@perfect.com
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)

-----Original Message-----
From:  Eldon Sellers [mailto:eldon@interx.net]
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 3:10 PM
To: Cameron Sellers (E-mail); Cameron Sellers; Eldon (E-mail); Eldon
Sellers (E-mail); Nancy Sellers (E-mail); Jeffrey Dasovich (E-mail);
Prentice Sellers (E-mail); Prentice Sellers (E-mail 2); Scott Laughlin
(E-mail)
Subject: FW: Reservation Confirmation

<< File:  Reservation Confirmation.txt >> This is what I received from the
Westwood Marquis which has undergone a
renovation.  (I replied and told them to correct the address.)  Let me know
if this is OK.  I don't know if  we can find a cheaper place, but if you
think this rate is too high I can try.  Also, I made reservations to go to
Burbank on Dec. 31 using Southwest Airlines and leaving from Oakland at
10:40 am, arriving at 11:40.  Returning on Jan. 1 at 8:15 pm and arriving at
9:20.  However, I learned from Cameron that all but your mother and I will
be going on Dec. 30 so I  will cancel that part of the reservation.  I don't
know  what your plans are for returning so I will not be making any  other
reservations unless I hear from you.  I originally made the returning
reservation at the time I did so that if we came back to the house on Monday
to watch football games and  play games we would have some time to do that.
If we don't do that we could possibly get an earlier flight back.  Your
mother doesn't want to come  back too late, so your mother and I couldn't
possibly watch a movie if Hef has one planned for later, but you might
consider that possibility.  Our check-in time at the W is 3:00 pm,  possibly
earlier.  I assume you got my message left on the answering  machine that
everyone  has been invited to the party.

-----Original Message-----
From:  whotels@whotels.com [mailto:whotels@whotels.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 6:08 PM
To: ELDON@interx.net
Subject: Reservation Confirmation


Howdy!

We need your help!  Earlier this week, a letter was sent to you asking you to renew your support for The Association of Former Students in 2001.  Because of the time sensitivity of this request, we wanted to make sure you received this message via e-mail as well.

This year is almost over and The Association is just below our goal of raising six million dollars for Texas A&M in 2001.  We need your help to allow us to provide critical unrestricted funds to the University that directly support the students and former students of Texas A&M.

To learn more about how The Association supports Aggies everywhere and to donate on-line by December 31st, please visit www.AggieNetwork.com.

With your support, The Association has always met Texas A&M's financial needs.  Your continued support in 2001 and beyond will ensure the traditions and spirit that make Texas A&M so special to us all remain in tact.

Thank you and Gig 'em,

Matt Jennings '95
Director of Annual Giving


what time are you going to get into town?


Mark,

As discussed. Let me know if anything comes up. Thanks.

Brian Hendon
Enron Global Markets
Finance & Structuring
direct:  713-853-6301
cell:     713-502-5021
fax:      713-646-3203


somebody explain this to me.  two weeks ago i was riding a 5 game
winning streak and my "power ranking" was near the bottom with
john and the other has beens.  i lose two in a row and my "power
ranking" improves?  we got ourselfs a bcs system allright!!!

---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "John Riches" <john_riches@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2001 14:20:53 +0000

>That's right, John won!
>
>Fear me one and all.
>
>
>>From: "Mark Molnar" <MarkM@cajunusa.com>
>>To: <Frthis@aol.com>,<Rs1119@aol.com>, <wolphguy@aol.com>,
>><martier@cpchem.com>, <Dutch.Quigley@enron.com>,
<siva66@mail.ev1.net>,
>><john_riches@msn.com>, <jramirez@othon.com>, <klyn@pdq.net>,
>><djackson@rpsionline.com>
>>Subject: Richard Sucks!!!!!!
>>Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2001 08:03:39 -0600
>>
>>How bad is Richard Blues that he can't score two damn points
last night to
>>beat Cheerio Man?  Thanks for nothing jerk.  On a lighter
note...John won,
>>John won, John won.  Kevin, thank you for taking out the 2700
club, while I
>>returned the favor by bitch slapping the KMB Express.
>>
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>
>

________________________________________________________________
Sent via the EV1 webmail system at mail.ev1.net


Here is the map of our peakers plants.  I am looking for some good bullet
points to go along with them.
Ben


SCIENTECH's IssueAlert
Today's IssueAlert Sponsors:
[IMAGE] SCIENTECH is currently interviewing 1,500 utilities on CIS/CRM and customer care in the United States and Canada to determine:      The leading software providers  Drivers of utility technology decisions  Analysis of license sales versus ASP sales  New market opportunities  Growing/shrinking software markets    Download a sample prospectus for an introduction to this new survey at: http://secure.scientech.com/specialpages/Multi_Client.asp  and  contact Jon Brock at 505-244-7607 for more details.

[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
October 17, 2001
AES Hits Brick Wall in Venezuelan Acquisition
By Will McNamara
Director, Electric Industry Analysis

[IMAGE]
[News item from Reuters] Venezuelan telecommunications firm CANTV, or Compania Anomima Nacional Telefonos, facing a $1.37-billion hostile takeover bid by AES Corp. (NYSE: AES) has forced a showdown with the U.S.-based global power company by announcing a share repurchase program. The Board of Directors of CANTV, Venezuela's biggest telecommunications company, recommended that shareholders approve a proposed share buyback program of up to 15 percent of CANTV's shares at a price of $30 per American Depositary Share (ADS), or approximately $4.29 per share. Analysts said the CANTV Board's proposals, which would be submitted to shareholders at an extraordinary meeting set for Oct. 24, clearly flung down the gauntlet to AES.
Analysis: AES' expansion in Latin America's telecommunications market was always seen as a risky move, and now that risk seems to be resulting in a big bite out of the company's strategy. CANTV, which was an appealing takeover target for AES due to its long-standing monopoly over the telecom market in Venezuela, has a strong ally in the form of Verizon Communications (NYSE: VZ), which holds a 28.5-percent stake in the company. Verizon came out in support of the 15-percent repurchase program being launched by CANTV, which clearly is a form of aggressive resistance against AES' efforts to gain control over the company. The repurchase could be seen as a power play, with Verizon also seeking to increase its share in CANTV, which many analysts might see as a more appropriate synergy. However, this story also highlights the difficulty that AES has had with its expansion efforts in Latin America, especially since CANTV's resistance comes on the heels of AES' pulling out of another acquisition project in Ecuador.
For background, it is important to note that AES already owns 6.9 percent of CANTV through its majority ownership of Electricidad de Caracas, Venezuela's largest private electricity company. Thus, the takeover effort is an attempt to gain majority ownership of the company and take control away from Verizon.  CANTV, which was privatized a decade ago, is a full-service telecommunications provider offering switched and local, domestic and international long-distance service throughout Venezuela Company. CANTV also offers mobile cellular services, wireless services, Internet access and other value-added services, and owns all of the Venezuelan public exchanges and national network of public telephone lines. CANTV became privatized about 10 years ago and until last year reportedly had a monopoly on the fixed-line telephone service in Venezuela. The company has a market capitalization of $2.6 billion.
AES had bid $24 in cash for each of the 28.57-million U.S.-listed shares in CANTV and $3.43 in cash for each of the 200 million shares of CANTV traded in Venezuela. AES' offer for CANTV's American shares represents a 9.2-percent premium over CANTV's closing price of $21.98 on Aug. 29, the time at which the takeover effort was launched. From the start of the offer, some critics charged that this bid was too low, but AES has maintained that the offer is fair. AES reportedly plans to sell off CANTV's mobile services, which account for about a quarter of the company's revenues, and distribute the proceeds to shareholders.
CANTV was never very receptive to AES' bid, and did consider it to be a hostile takeover. In fact, workers' representatives at CANTV circulated a statement strongly objecting to the bid from AES, stating that the deal would severely damage Venezuela and CANTV workers. CANTV employees hold a 10.9-percent interest in the company. Now we see that CANTV is upping that resistance a notch by attempting a repurchase of its own stock. Note that CANTV will most likely issue the buyback program at $30, compared to the $24 that AES had offered. Thus, the challenge for AES, if it still wants to gain control over CANTV, will be to increase its already 9.2-percent premium offer. The word circulating in the industry is that AES still intends to proceed with its takeover attempt, and the CANTV strategy will not derail these attempts.
AES' rationale for increasing its holdings in the company is most likely twofold in nature. First, AES obviously finds great appeal in the Latin American market as the company already owns electricity assets in Brazil, Chile and other countries. Just this week, AES announced its penetration of the Argentina market by inking a $376-million deal to purchase distribution and generation assets in that country from New Jersey-based Public Service Enterprise Group (PSEG). In another recent announcement, AES launched a cash tender offer to acquire all of the outstanding loan participation certificates of Empresa Electrica del Norte Grande in northern Chile, a company that consists of 716 MW of generation and 1,056 kilometers of transmission. In fact, AES reportedly rivals Spain's Endesa as the region's most dominant power company and by all appearances now derives a large part of its business throughout Latin America. Whereas AES was clearly diversified across the United States, Asia, Europe, and Latin America, many investors now perceive the company as moving into a heavier focus on Latin America, which constitutes a risky proposition in and of itself due to unique politics in the various Latin American countries.
However, AES recently pulled out of its attempt to launch a $128-million takeover bid for Chilean generator Edelnor. Currently, Edelnor, which is one of the largest electrical generators in Chile, is controlled by Mirant Corp., one of AES' direct competitors in the independent power producing market. Perhaps also reacting to the volatility in the region, Mirant has announced that it will not sink any additional capital into the Edelnor unit unless it can be assured of repayment. AES did not give a reason for its decision to terminate the Edelnor takeover, but one can surmise that investor reactor to its ongoing efforts in Venezuela may have been a significant factor. Further, on Sept. 25, AES cut its earnings estimate for 2001 to a range of $1.25 to $1.45 per share from a previous range of $1.75 to $1.90. AES blamed poor currency exchange rates between the Brazilian real and U.S. dollar, lower U.K. power prices, and the company's inability to replace earnings anticipated from the planned acquisition of the Mohave power plant. The drop in AES' earnings estimate may have lowered available capital that the company needed to purchase Edelnor.
AES shares were priced at $24.25 prior to the earnings revision. After the announcement, at least as of early morning trading on Sept. 27, AES shares were priced at $12.25, significantly down from the 52-week high of $73, which is what the stock was priced at a year ago. As of early morning trading on Oct. 17, AES shares were priced at $14.81.
Moreover, investors did not react positively to AES' plan to increase its stake in CANTV. In fact, after word of the deal began to circulate on Aug. 29 (a day on which many stocks fell) AES' stock closed down $2.94, or 8.3 percent, to a 20-month low of $32.65 on the New York Stock Exchange. AES CEO Dennis Bakke immediately attempted to reassure investors that the purchase did not represent a change of strategy for AES, which he says will remain focused on power. In addition, Bakke noted that the purchase does not represent a new venture for AES as the company already holds telecom assets in Brazil and Bolivia. Further, Bakke clearly stated that AES is "not going to announce a bunch of telecom acquisitions around the world." Nevertheless, some investors believe that AES is imprudently expanding into the telecom sector, which is already significantly troubled, and becoming too heavily entrenched in Latin America, a market that is prone to political volatility. One investment analyst perhaps spoke for many when he commented that AES has little experience in the telecom sector and its limited experience to date has not been terribly successful. This, coupled with the general market downturn for most companies with telecom exposure, does not make for a good recipe from an investor's perspective, at least as of today.
In fairness to AES, penetrating the Venezuelan market could represent a very strategic move from a long-term perspective. With a population of 23.5 million, Venezuela represents a large potential market for energy and other related services. In addition, Venezuela is an asset-rich country, particularly with regard to oil resources. According to the Department of Energy, Venezuela is important to world energy markets because it holds proven oil reserves of 77 billion barrels, plus billions of barrels of extra-heavy oil and bitumen. Venezuela consistently ranks as one the top suppliers of U.S. oil imports and is among the top 10 crude oil producers in the world. In addition, as noted AES' investments in Latin America are not exclusively focused on Venezuela, as the company also is present in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, etc.
Concerns about telecom arguably overshadow concerns about expansion in Latin America and play a larger role in the drop in AES' stock, especially when we consider that AES has been present in Latin America for some time. Only little more than a year ago, the telecom sector was at its peak, with billions of capital investment flooding into the sector as wildly optimistic expectations for demand seemingly exaggerated the scale of the market. However, a massive downturn has ensued, impacting not only companies operating in the telecom space but the nation's entire economy as well. The bottom of the telecom sector has fallen out, due in large part to the fact that the increase in bandwidth capacity has outpaced the growth in market demand.
As I've said before when analyzing this company, the further that AES departs from its core strategy, the more likely it is that we will continue to see volatility in the company's stock. Up until these recent announcements, AES maintained that it was engaged in three lines of businesses, which were all equally important to its strategy: power generation, network delivery services and retail energy marketing. Generation always appeared to be the main core of the company's business model, as AES controls some 125 facilities totaling over 44 gigawatts of capacity worldwide. This business model worked well for AES and was well received by investors. Any perceived deviation from this successful strategy-especially if it includes expansion into the dangerous territory of telecom-could mark a new and risky era for AES.
Nevertheless, one could also surmise that AES has found a market opportunity that is worth exploring. Latin America has low electrification and Internet usage statistics. Some analysts project high growth in the next 5 to 10 years in Latin America in both electrification and Internet use, which in turn involves telecommunications. The telecom industry is struggling at the moment. Thus, if one believes that telecom will make a comeback, then buying now may make a wise strategy for those involved.

An archive list of previous IssueAlerts is available atwww.scientech.com

We encourage our readers to contact us with their comments.  We look forward to hearing from you. Nancy Spring    Reach thousands of utility analysts and decision makers every day. Your company can schedule a sponsorship of IssueAlert by contacting Jane Pelz  . Advertising opportunities are also available on our Website.
  Our staff is comprised of leading energy experts with diverse  backgrounds in utility generation, transmission & distribution,  retail markets, new technologies, I/T, renewable energy, regulatory affairs,  community relations and international issues. Contact consulting@scientech.com   or call Nancy Spring at 1-505-244-7613.
SCIENTECH is pleased to provide you with your free,  daily IssueAlert. Let us know if we can help you with  in-depth analyses or any other SCIENTECH information  products. If you would like to refer a colleague to receive our free,  daily IssueAlerts, please reply to this e-mail and include  their full name and e-mail address or register directly on our site.    If you no longer wish to receive this daily e-mail, and you are currently a registered subscriber to IssueAlert via SCIENTECH's website,  please visit  http://secure.scientech.com/account/  to unsubscribe.  Otherwise, please send an e-mail to  to IssueAlert , with "Delete IA Subscription" in the subject line.
SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts(SM) are compiled based on the  independent analysis of SCIENTECH consultants. The opinions expressed in  SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are not intended to predict financial performance  of companies discussed, or to be the basis for investment decisions of any  kind. SCIENTECH's sole purpose in publishing its IssueAlerts is to offer  an independent perspective regarding the key events occurring in the  energy industry, based on its long-standing reputation as an expert on  energy issues.     Copyright 2001. SCIENTECH, Inc. All rights  reserved.


---------------------- Forwarded by Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT on 09/28/2000
01:02 PM ---------------------------

	Invitation
Chairperson: Chris Gaskill
Sent by: Amanda Huble

Start: 10/02/2000 04:00 PM
End: 10/02/2000 05:00 PM

Description: Meeting to discuss Associate Analyst Presentation in EB32C2

This meeting repeats   starting on    (if the date occurs on a weekend the
meeting ).
Meeting Dates:

Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT
Airam Arteaga/HOU/ECT
Jennifer Fraser/HOU/ECT
Geoff Storey/HOU/ECT

Detailed description:


Phillip - Please do us a favor and play this often!


First and most important, for those of you that have room reservations at The
Woodlands Resort and Conference Center, if you have any changes that need to
be made or have decided NOT to stay, I need to know immediately so that we
can cancel and are not charged for those rooms.
Please call me directly and do not contact The Woodlands Resort.  Please see
the "revised" Agenda and review the Rooming List for accuracy and advise of
any corrections at this time.

Geriann Warner and I will be out at the Woodlands for the March 9th meeting
only.  We will be in the office on Thursday if anyone needs assistance.
Please have your presentation to me by Thursday for those of you who are
giving presentations.  If we need to make copies of your presentation, please
advise as well.  Eric Benson will be present for the March 8th meeting.
Again, the location of the meeting will be:
The Woodlands Resort
2301 North Millbend Drive
The Woodlands, TX  77380
Phone# 281-367-1100
Fax# 281-364-6274
Check-In time is 3:00pm
Check-Out time is 12:00pm

The Woodlands Resort provides transportation service to and from the airport
on a scheduled basis from 6:00am - 10:00pm at a cost of $32.00 per person,
per trip.  Reservations must be made a minimum of 24 hours in advance for
both arrivals and departures.  If you have an interest in using this service,
please call the resort directly.
MAP:


FYI......................

Beverly
---------------------- Forwarded by Beverly Beaty/HOU/ECT on 08/30/2000 08:10
AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Steve Holmes" <Steve.Holmes@dvn.com>
08/29/2000 03:57 PM

To: <Beverly.Beaty@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Revised Devon and Co-Owner Availabilities for September

Beverly,
The co-owner volumes have been updated to show a volume for Comet Petroleum
and James D. Finley under Burnell N. Pettus.  Additionally, Devon's volume
under Burnell /N. Pettus has also increased slightly.

Steve

 - 0900Co-Owners Volumes to Enron.xls
 - EnronAvails0900Rev02.xls


I'll be ready and waiting!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ngo, Tracy
Sent:	Tuesday, August 28, 2001 3:12 PM
To:	Heard, Marie
Subject:	RE: Allegheny

I'm scared to go up near your desk.  I'll wear protective gear.  Thanks for your understanding.  I will not tell you my temp number either for I fear much!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Heard, Marie
Sent:	Tuesday, August 28, 2001 3:11 PM
To:	Ngo, Tracy
Subject:	RE: Allegheny

Tomorrow is fine.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ngo, Tracy
Sent:	Tuesday, August 28, 2001 3:11 PM
To:	Heard, Marie
Subject:	RE: Allegheny

Well, I'll be on the legal floor tomorrow.  Do you want me to just drop by your office then?  Or do you need it now?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Heard, Marie
Sent:	Tuesday, August 28, 2001 3:10 PM
To:	Ngo, Tracy
Subject:	RE: Allegheny

Boy, I'm REALLY mad at you!  Just kidding!  I thought you were just going to initial the signature pages and then we would get Kevin to sign it here.  Since you're in town, I can run the originals down to you (if you'll tell me where you are) so that you can initial and then I can ask Kevin to sign.

Thanks!

Marie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ngo, Tracy
Sent:	Tuesday, August 28, 2001 3:08 PM
To:	Heard, Marie
Cc:	Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	RE: Allegheny

Marie,

Don't be mad.  I have not gotten it signed.  When I was ready to do so, Belden was unreachable.  Then I suddenly forgot prior to rushing down to H-town.  What do you want me to do now?  Get Kevin this week?  or Get Tim on Tues. after Labor Day?  Are you really mad?  I'm sorry.  Please advise on how I can try and do damage control.

Tracy

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Heard, Marie
Sent:	Monday, August 27, 2001 4:34 PM
To:	Ngo, Tracy
Subject:	Allegheny

Hi, Tracy!

I have never received the signature pages for the Allegheny ISDA.  Have you sent them?

Mare


Looks good to me.  I'm glad you had the chance to work with Linda.

Jeannie Mandelker@ECT
05/23/2001 03:31 PM
To: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: eBiz article on Bush energy plan

Linda, thanks for making time for me today.

This is the eBiz article we'd like to run Friday. I need your comments by
noon tomorrow.

You can e-mail them back or  reach me at 3-6305.

Thanks,
Jeannie


As I mentioned earlier to Mark, Jeff Girth of the NYT again today contacted
Lee Sachs about Enron.  You recall Lee was Asst Secretary of Treasury for
Financial Markets during the Clinton Administration.  From his conversation,
Lee reports the following items were raised by Girth:  a) the state of energy
trading products and investment climate; b)  Enron's role in this market; c)
whether and how financial energy products drive pricing and supply of
physical energy products (Lee told him emphatically no); and, c) whether
government regulators understand these issues.  Lee said this is clearly an
Enron specific story.  Lee thinks Girth came away from the conversation with
more of a right perspective (namely that these are important markets and that
we play a vital role).  Lee said that Girth was less focussed on passage of
the CEA and the politics than Girth had been in an earlier conversation;
almost all  of today's conversation was forward looking.  Girth told Lee that
he had not told Lee "all" that is behind this story, but did say that there
is an interesting twist (Lee thinks Girth perhaps something specific either
on a document front or source).   Lee gave Girth a list of experts to talk to
who are unbiased but clearly right thinking on the subject.  Lee suggested
that Girth to:  Pat Parkinson at the Fed (the godfather of the "hands off"
regulatory perspective for the OTC market), Bill Rainer, and Ed Rosen (a
prominent attorney in NY).  Lee expects Girth to keep calling him.


I assume we avoid Libya completely.  The question, though, may be how we
proceed if we are doing business with someone who has activities in Libya.
Your views please.
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 10/16/2000 09:01 AM -----

	Nicholas O'Day
	10/16/2000 04:59 AM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Enron's policy on Libya

Steve,

Itochu Corporation, a Japanese trading company with which we are developing a
relationship, is considering reactivating its activities in Libya. They have
identified an opportunity to source LNG from Libya for the purposes of
importing to Japan, either directly or through an LNG swap.

What is Enron's current policy on dealing with Libya?

kind regards


The comment about loose lips was a general comment, I felt the undertone, in general, was to leave marketers out of the process.

Doug Sewell
Enron Midwest Origination
Work: 713-853-6337
Fax:   713-646-8272

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bestard, Jose
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 5:23 PM
To:	Rodriquez, Andy
Cc:	Yeung, Charles; Steffes, James D.; Shapiro, Richard; Sewell, Doug; Nicolay, Christi L.
Subject:	Re: NERC and Security

Andy. Can you put a letter with the facts. As a starter I want to send a letter directly to NERC  raising our concerns. There should be no limitations that hinders the marketers ability to engage in commerce.

Jose

From:	Andy Rodriquez/ENRON@enronXgate on 10/23/2001 12:29 PM
To:	Charles Yeung/ENRON@enronXgate, James D Steffes/ENRON@enronXgate, Richard Shapiro/ENRON@enronXgate, Jose Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:	Doug Sewell/ENRON@enronXgate, Christi L Nicolay/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject:	NERC and Security

NERC is apparently moving forward aggressively on their initiative to restrict access to market information.  Doug Sewell, who participates on the MAIN Planning Committee, was on a call this morning in which members of MAIN and NERC's Virginia Sulzberger discussed ways to limit access to information.  A new disturbing angle was that apparently, some members indirectly alleged that marketers have "higher turnover" and "loose lips," and were using this as a scare tactic to indicate why the information should be restricted (potentially even from legitimate consumers like us).

If I remember correctly, we were going to contact NERC to let them know our opinions on this issue.  It sounds like perhaps they are not being addressed sufficiently.  Doug has suggested we should being it up at the MAIN MIC meeting; do we want to begin a campaign to protect our access to this data?  I think that without getting more involved, this will be yet another industry "de facto" standard that is created under the assumption that silence is consent (even if we're not told about the changes).  We should probably talk about this all today on our conference call.

Andy Rodriquez
Regulatory Affairs - Enron Corp.
andy.rodriquez@enron.com
713-345-3771


Tana,

FYI !

Per verification recd below and pending letterhead documentation from the
counterparty, CP# 95964 Western Area Power Administration - Desert SW Region
will be inactivated in GCP.  CP# 47358 will involve a name change procedure
from Western Area Power Administration - Phoenix Area Office to Western Area
Power Administration - Desert Southwest Region.

BR

---------------------- Forwarded by Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT on 04/18/2001
04:23 PM ---------------------------

Rhonda L Denton
04/18/2001 09:52 AM
To: Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Western Area Power Administration

Bernice, here is the information on WAPA counterparties.  I will send you a
specific request on each of these entities when I can get to it.  In the
meantime, can you please change the name for WAPA phonenix to WAPA-Desert
Southwest Region so that we do not have duplicate records and tell EOL about
the changes.  Let me know if you have questions.  EOL is waiting for me to
populate a contract for the new record that you set up for desert SW region
and we need to get this resolved.
---------------------- Forwarded by Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT on 04/18/2001
09:49 AM ---------------------------

"Mark Meyer" <MMEYER@wapa.gov> on 04/18/2001 09:47:53 AM
To: <Rhonda.L.Denton@enron.com>
cc: <TMEEKS@wapa.gov>
Subject: Re: Western Area Power Administration

These offices are members:

WAPA-Colorado River Storage Project Manangement Center (CRSP)  (This office
is in Salt Lake City and was formerly known as Salt Lake City Area or Upper
Colorado)

WAPA-Desert Southwest Region (This office is in Phoenix and was formerly know
as Phoenix Area, or Lower Colorado)

WAPA-Rocky Mountain Region  (This office is in Loveland, Colorado and was
formerly known as Loveland Area, Loveland-Fort Collins Area, and Lower
Missouri)

WAPA-Upper Great Plains Region (This office is in Billings, MT, and was
formerly known as Billings Area, Upper Missouri, and Pick-Sloan Missouri)

You can find information about all these offices at our website:  www.wapa.gov

Thanks,   Mark Meyer

>>> <Rhonda.L.Denton@enron.com> 04/17 4:14 PM >>>
I work for Enron and am trying to determine (1) which of your offices are
members of the Western Systems Power Pool and (2) what the current names
are for your entitites.  I need the full legal name for each.  Below is a
list of the names I have in my database of names.  Can you please confirm
if these are current and/or if any names have been changed.  The WSPP
Administrator sent me the attachment, which indicates the Phoenix office
houses "Lower Colorado".  I'm not sure if this is accurate.  Thank you very
much for your help.

WAPA-Salt Lake City
WAPA-Desert Southwest Region
WAPA-Lower Missouri
WAPA-Pick-Sloan Missouri
WAPA-Rocky Mountain
WAPA-Sierra Nevada Region
WAPA-Upper Great Plain
WAPA-Billings Area
WAPA-Phoenix Area

Rhonda Denton
Contracts Administration
713/853-5871
713/646-2443 (FAX)

---------------------- Forwarded by Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT on 04/17/2001
05:07 PM ---------------------------

"Rachel Small" <rsmall@wspp.org> on 04/17/2001 04:55:37 PM

To:   <Rhonda.L.Denton@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  Re: Western Area Power Administration

Hello Rhonda,

I am attaching a Word document with all the WSPP member contacts for
"Western Area Power Administration(s)" - hopefully one of them is the one
you are looking for - if not, please let me know and I will try to find
out!

Rachel Strauss Small
Web Development Team

(703) 288-0859 (fax)

----- Original Message -----
From: <Rhonda.L.Denton@enron.com>
To: <admin@wspp.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 3:05 PM
Subject: Western Area Power Administration

> Can you please tell me if WAPA- Desert Southwest Region is a member of
the
> WSPP?  This is their Phoenix office and I thought they had been a member
of
> the WSPP under the name "Western Area Power Administration-Phoenix Area
> Office."  Thanks for the info.
>
>

(See attached file: Western Adm Contacts.doc)


I'll tell you what.  You give us your "want"  list and we'll make sure you
can do it all.
Of course, after you assemble the chair.

What was Lowery doing in San Antonio??

KR


Start Date: 4/28/01; HourAhead hour: 19;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.


Sharron,

Please find attached the presentation for the meeting on Helsinki with Joe
Sutton at 8.30am (there have been some minor changes from earlier versions).
Would you print off enough colour copies for the Houston attendees?

I also attach a supplementary document which may not be required in the
meeting, but it would be useful if a number of copies could be to hand just
in case.

Many thanks

Fernley


Susan,

These are book requests for the Netco books for all regions.

Please let me know if you have any questions.  We put in some book and portfolio codes we would like if they are available.  If not, please call me.  We need all price, basis, index, and gas daily US books to be the same, all Canadian books to be the same and all physical books to have the same codes please.

Thanks

Kam


We have the Equitrans capacity (1,000 dt/day)  through July.  Scott will tell
John Singer we need to get out of this capacity.  Scott and I have decided to
leave this on the CES Retail worksheet and see what happens.

ENA purchased the 19,000 of BG&E space from CES.

	From:  Colleen Sullivan                           05/11/2000 11:04 AM

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: CES Retail capacity

Per our discussion on Monday, we need to give CES-Retail a bid for the two
TCO transportation contracts that were dedicated to c&i customers that they
will no longer need once they sell their c&i business effective 6/1/00.  As
you recall, one contract is to COH for 20,000/d through 10/31/00 (#65402);
the other is to BG&E  for 19,000/d through 4/01(#65403).  This is the
information that Jeff Porter and Charlie gave to me--you need to confirm that
this information is accurate.

I am going to call Charlie back tomorrow morning (Friday, 5/12) and suggest
that he talk to one of you two directly for a bid on the agreements.  I think
this will be more efficient (and put the pressure on you to price it
up!!).    If there is any problem with this, please let me know.


October 25, 2001
Notice #01-96

CORRECTION:

NOTICE OF  INTENTION TO TRANSFER MEMBERSHIP

             Please be advised that effective   with the open of business, October 25, 2001, the following member(s) have  given notice of intention to transfer their extra Membership within the  Exchange:

Eric Bolling  (RBI-4775)
Daniel Rappaport  (RAP-966)

             Members and Member Firms have (10) days from the date of this notice to  advise the Corporate Secretary's Office of any claims in accordance with Rule  2.51.

             Inquiries regarding the above should be addressed to the Member Services  Department at 212-299-2378.


If anyone asks, I would prefer to have Gloria for our temp.

Thanks,

Kay

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 09/07/2000 12:29 PM
To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary J
Heinitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda Whitehead/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kaye Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janette
Elbertson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: October Vacation

I have already requested October 23-26 off for vacation and would like to add
the 27th to make it a week off.  Brenda, would you please get a temp for my
desk for that entire week.  Thanks!


Energy Committee Representatives...please read the following as it may be
something we would like to influence.

-----Original Message-----
From: Elizabeth Treanor [mailto:etreanor@orc-sac.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 2:52 PM
To: Elizabeth Treanor
Subject: PUC Seeks ORC Help-Rolling Blackouts in California
Importance: High

April 12, 2001

To:        ORC Western Occupational Safety and Health Group

From:    Elizabeth A. Treanor

Subject:    Consultants on Power Outages

This is a little out of our realm, but ORC received a call from a
strategic planner with the Public Utilities Commission, who
informed us that because of the energy shortage in California,
there will be rolling blackouts this summer.  The PUC is looking
for consultants who can provide information in the following
areas:

1.    Impact of power outages on chemical processes
2.      Impact of power outages on biomedical processes.

3.    Impact of power outages at public events (and who
understands current regulations with regard to ballparks).

The PUC is seeking to bypass the state contracting procedures and
finalize contracts within the next few weeks.  They asked ORC for
names of consultants with expertise in the above areas.  When ORC
volunteered that power outages can have a significant impact on
manufacturing operations as well, they thanked us for sharing but
they are interested in direct impacts on health or safety.

If you have any suggestions for the PUC, please provide them to
me ASAP; the PUC requested a response by April 16, 2001.

Thank you.

--
Elizabeth A. Treanor <etreanor@orc-sac.com>
ORC Inc.  <http://www.orc-sac.com>
400 Capitol Mall, Ste. 1545
Sacramento, CA   95814
(916) 447-3102
(916) 447-3127 FAX


Sara- Are you going to come out ok? Come live with me!    sam


Larry-

Water Disposal:  The current rate of water production has been established as
a compromise between what we think is most effective for removing PSH and
what we think are reasonable disposal costs. Our objective is to flush out
PSH that is trapped in dissolution channels and fractures in the aquifer.
Dewatering is not an objective because the shallow aquifer is too prolific a
producer. In an effort to flush out trapped PSH we pump 200 bbls of
groundwater twice weekly (or 1600 bbl per month). In addition we manually
remove any accumulated PSH from recovery wells that do not have pumps in
them. Pumping 200 bbls per cycle takes about 24 hours and is adequate to
create a significant drawdown of the aquifer in the immediate vicinity of the
former pit area. The aquifer will recharge within 24 hours, but we don't
start another cycle until after about 60 hours in order to limit the number
of cycles to two per week. The number of cycles is limited to two per week
primarily for cost considerations, but also because our minor permit
specifies a maximum disposal rate of 400 bbl per week. If we were to limit
the number of cycles to one per week we would drop our PSH removal efficiency
by nearly 50%; likewise, if we were to increase the number of cycles to four
per week we would increase our removal efficiency by nearly 100%. Note that
beyond about four cycles per week, there will be a deminishing advantage to
increasing the number of cycles due to the time it takes to draw down the
aquifer and the time it takes for the aquifer to recharge. Cycling the pumps
twice per week also fits well into our O&M schedule for other sites in the
area. We are spending about $3,200 per month for O&M at this site, about
$1,800 per month on water disposal and $1,400 for O&M labor. These costs are
directly proportional to the number of cycles per week that we operate the
pumps. In regard to the effectiveness of this scheme, we have seen some
positive indications in both a reduction of accumulated PSH in the former pit
area recovery wells and a decrease in dissolved phase contaminants at monitor
wells downgradient from the former pit area. An exception to this is the
accumulation of PSH from what appears to be another source located west of
the former pit area. This issue is being addressed by the installation of
additional recovery wells. Another note regarding water disposal, we had
briefly discussed the possibility of irrigating produced water rather than
hauling it. We temporarily dismissed this idea over concern that arsenic
contained in groundwater might accumulate in surface soil as a result of
irrigation. We should revisit this idea next spring if it appears that
pumping will continue much longer.

Monitor Wells:  Although the additional wells that we have planned should
adequately delineate the dissolved phase plume, I am reluctant to think that
these will be the last. The TRC recently rejected closure requests for about
a half-dozen ENA sites. In a recent meeting between the TRC and David Ayers
(for ENA), the TRC requested that ENA return to the sites and delineate
dissolved phase contaminant plumes to MCL concentrations. Although the TRC
has not yet made that request for this site, it is certainly a possibility.
This is also consistent with recent draft guidance documents prepared by the
TRC that specifies plume delineation to MCL concentrations. Currently,
arsenic is the only contaminant in groundwater that is not delineated to MCL
concentrations, more specifically, downgradient and east of the release area.
We will have to wait and see what results we get from the new wells before we
have a better idea whether any additional wells may someday be required.

Recovery Wells:  This is totally dependent on what we find with the
additional recovery wells. I suspect that we are going to confirm a separate
source of PSH and will require additional wells to adequately remove PSH.

Larry Campbell
10/02/2000 09:09 AM
To: George Robinson/OTS/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: NNG Gomez Remediation

George, Ive read through your stuff on the Gomez remediation and need some
help.  Why are we collecting so much groundwater.  Im concerned that charges
for twice weekly disposal may be perceived as excessive, even though the
costs are reasonable.  Are we trying to dewater or what?  Other than that, I
dont mind ensuring the protection of the upstream spring and think we should
get busy on the well installations.  Do you think this will do it with
respect to no more wells needed.  Id like to get to that position as quickly
as possible.


Kathryn Corbally (Senior Director currently in Investor Relations) is moving
to Connecticut soon to join her husband.  He has been working up there for
the last six or eight months - he was one of the group that defected from our
weather derivatives team about a year ago.  She hopes to continue to work for
Enron - has been talking with Investor Relations and some other groups that I
can't remember - and to do so either out of her home or in Enron's New York
office.

It struck me that depending upon needs at MG's New York office, that Kathryn
could be someone for you to consider.   She came originally from the London
office - you may or may not find anyone still there that could give you some
feedback on her.  In London, she ran mid and back office - that was in very
early days for EEL, so most of the job was probably accounting.  She came to
Houston and  has done a number of different things.  I think that she is well
organized and control minded.  Understands Enron's business.  Managing a
group of people is probably not her strongest attribute.  I am not sure that
people enjoy working under her.  That could be old news, however.  There are
a number of people here in Houston that could probably give you a read on her
based on very recent experience.  Do you know of her?

Just thought that I would mention her as a potential resource in New York.
Don't know what your short and longer term needs are there.  She would
definitely represent an Enron point of view.  They have two small daughters -
she might be interested in something part time even.  Could mean lower cost
that way.

This idea may not have any merit or you may not have a need around metals.
If you do want to consider this, I will be glad to help identify who you
could go to for some fact finding around her.  Let me know.  --Sally


WE CUT THE FOLLOWING SCHEDULES RT. HE 13 EPMI_CISO_SPP 40 MW EXPORT AT SUMMIT. ALSO EPMI_CISO_TOBY FOR THE SAME HOUR GOT CUT FROM 25 TO O AT NOB.

I COULD NOT FIND THE VOLUME MGMT EMAIL ADDRESS SO I AM ONLY SENDING IT TO YOU.

GEIR


I have contacted the relevant people of your interest in the job.

Danny_Jones%ENRON@eott.com on 04/30/2001 01:39:56 PM
To:	stan.horton@enron.com
cc:

Subject:	employee referral

Dear Mr. Horton,  I have recently been made aware of a help desk analyst
job#0000108806 that has become available in your department. I am currently
employed with the aviation department (hangar attendant) of enron and would
like to use my past knowledge and experience to persue my goals in the
technology feild. I am asking respectfully if you could give me a
recommendation or referral to ETS technology department. Anything you could
do to help further my goals would be appreciated.

          Respectfully,
          Danny Jones
     281-443-3744 smithjones@ev1.net


Scott -- What kind of attendance did they get from the press?
Ken
----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott Govenar" <sgovenar@govadv.com>
To: "Hedy Govenar" <hgovenar@govadv.com>; "Mike Day" <MDay@GMSSR.com>; "Bev
Hansen" <bhansen@lhom.com>; "Jeff Dasovich" <jdasovic@enron.com>; "Susan J
Mara" <smara@enron.com>; "Joseph Alamo" <JAlamo@enron.com>; "Paul Kaufman"
<paul.kaufman@enron.com>; "Michael McDonald" <Michael.McDonald@enron.com>;
"Sandra McCubbin" <Sandra.McCubbin@enron.com>; "Rick Shapiro"
<rshapiro@enron.com>; "Jim Steffes" <james.d.steffes@enron.com>; "Alan
Comnes" <acomnes@enron.com>; "Steven Kean" <Steven.J.Kean@enron.com>; "Karen
Denne" <kdenne@enron.com>; <Harry.Kingerski@enron.com>; "Mike D Smith"
<msmith1@enron.com>; "Leslie Lawner" <Leslie.Lawner@enron.com>; "Robert
Frank" <rfrank@enron.com>; "Ken Smith" <ken@kdscommunications.com>; "Janel
Guerrero" <Janel.Guerrero@enron.com>; "Miyung Buster"
<Miyung.Buster@enron.com>; "Jennifer Thome" <Jennifer.Thome@enron.com>;
"Eric Letke" <eletke@enron.com>; "Mary Schoen" <Mary.Schoen@enron.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 2:02 PM
Subject: Investigation

> Today's hearing of the Select Committee to Investigation Price
> Manipulation of the Wholesale Energy Market was canceled.  In it's
> place, Senator Dunn held a press conference where he announced the
> following:
>
> The next hearing will take place on May 18 at 9:00 a.m. at the Irvine
> City Council Chambers in Southern California.  There will be three
> witnesses; Elaine Howle - Bureau of State Audits, Loretta Lynch - CPUC
> and Bob Pease - Legal Director - FERC.  The hearing is expected to last
> all day.
>
> The following hearing will take place in Sacramento on May 24.  That
> hearing will feature witnesses from the PX.
>
> The Committee has retained Larry Drivon as Special Counsel.  Mr. Drivon
> is a civil practitioner from Stockton.
>
> The Committee is expanding its investigation in conjunction with local
> district attorneys.  Their goal is to create a statewide task force.
> The Committee may not be able to enlist the aid of the Attorney General
> as there are certain prohibitions in law which apparently stand in their
> way.  To date, the only DA conducting an investigation is from San
> Jouqin County.  The basis for their investigation is price fixing, theft
> of public funds and anti-trust violations.  The DA is offering immunity
> in exchange for testimony.
>
> The Committee has distributed data requests to the top five generators
> and Enron.  They intend to issue more data requests to marketers in the
> coming weeks.  The Committee is meeting with generators at 2:30 p.m.
> today to review the data request and determine what data the generators
> may be willing to submit.  The Committee intends to issue subpoenas to
> obtain certain documents which the generators may not willingly
> provide.  The Committee has subpoenaed the ISO who is expected to
> release documents on May 7.  Some generators have expressed concern that
> the ISO documents are protected under confidentiality agreements.
>
> According to the Committee, upon cursory review of the public documents
> they have already obtained, it does appear as if suspicious, if not
> illegal, activity has occurred on the part of the generators and
> marketers.
>
>
>


Amazon.com: Weekly Movie Showtimes


Vince,
The PSerc meeting Lance and I went to was both interesting
and boring. PSerc has 11 school members  and 30 industry members. Its Research
Program consists of three stems:  Markets, Transmission and Distribution,
and Systems. (Enron's interests probably lie mainly in the first stem.)

In morning of the first day, researchers from universities
presented their project proposals. I found some of them
quite interesting. For example, Shmuel Oren, Fernando Alvarado,
Tim Mount (of Cornell) propose to study "Market Redesign: Incorporating
the lessons learned from actual experiences for enhancing market
design,"  Shijie Deng, S. Oren et al propose to study " Power asset
valuation model in a market-based and reliability-constrained electric
power system." The first got funded but the second did not.

In the same afternoon industry and academic separated to have their
own discussion. I went to the academic discussion and Lance the
industry one.  I hope my presence there did not make things worse, for
the discussion revealed a lot of organizational chaos and confusion.
The proposal screen process got a lot of heat from participants.

The proposal process goes as follows: researchers first write a short
proposal to appropriate stem committee (no industry participantion, it seems
to me),
each committee then ranks the proposal and selects the top 3 or 4. The
selected
proposals are then expanded to be present to the industry.  Industry then
gets to vote which proposals get funded.  However, some researchers were
very unhappy about the initial ranking and selection process. There were
accusation of self-ranking, communication between stem committee and
member schools breaking down, and so on. Some were even asking for
some sort of assurance that the project will be funded even before  wrting it
(the arguement was "Then it was a waste of our time to write proposals",
which I found quite amusing).

All in all, I found the process was not taken seriously enough by university
researchers. PSerc has been established for 5 years now and it still does
not have a proper proposal screen process, which is hard to believe. Also,
the communication among university researchers, between stem committee
and member schools, and most importantly, between researchers and industry,
are not  smooth as all.

Since the proposals are voted by 30 or so industry members, the "right"
projects may not get funded. Too many participants also make the decision
process very indecisive and quite painful to watch (Lance can comment on
this better).  They also wanted to spread the fund among all schools which
made the voting a less authoritive.

I believe Enron will not get much returns from join PSerc (price tag is
$40,000
per company per year).  If we find some projects interesting, we can sponsor
the schools in the form of summer interns, the schools claim that most of the
fund
goes to support students anyway.

Alex


Start Date: 1/11/02; HourAhead hour: 3;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011103.txt


Attached is the EGM Management Summary and Hot List that will be reviewed
with Mike and Jeff at their staff meeting on Monday morning.  Please give me
a call if you have any questions/comments.

Thanks,
Jeff
(39859)
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Smith/HOU/ECT on 09/15/2000 03:36 PM
---------------------------

Patricia Anderson
09/15/2000 03:21 PM
To: Jeff Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Hot List & Management Summary at 9/14

Patricia


Carol:
Thanks so much for your good wishes.  I really value your opinion and
consider you a major asset to the swap group (I actually give myself a "pat
on the head" for being able to entice you to join the group).  I look forward
to lunch next week.
Sara

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Carol St Clair
	03/13/2001 10:24 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Congrats

Sara:
I just wanted to finally congratulate you on your well-deserved promotion to
AGC!  I am really, really happy for you, as you are one of the primary
reasons why I have chosen to stay in this group.  I would like to take you
out to lunch to celebrate and will ask Suzanne to get in touch with Kay to
get a date that is good for both of us.  Again, congrats on a tremendous
accomplishment.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


Shemin - we (EES) have been using December 2nd as our split date.  We understood to do so per separate conversations with Steve Van Hooser and Christy Finelli.   If it is possible to terminate the pools retroactively, we would much prefer using Dec.2nd as opposed to Dec. 3rd as Chris mentions below.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Thursday, March 14, 2002 6:23 PM
To:	McMichael Jr., Ed; Shemin Proctor (E-mail); Mark Ellenberg (E-mail)
Cc:	Concannon, Ruth; Parks, Joe; Garza, Maria; Mann, Kay; Bussell l, Kathryn; Hewitt, Jess P.; Loretta Cross (E-mail); Jeff Benton (E-mail); Melanie Gray (E-mail); Price, Wade R.; Dhont, Margaret
Subject:	FW: Dominion Producers

Recommendation for ENA Pools
1st choice  Terminate pools and producer contracts on 12/3/01, no cash flow and everything is pre-petition.
2nd choice Terminate pools and producer contracts on 12/31/01 and deal with one month's cash flow
3rd choice  Terminate pools as soon as possible to eliminate the administrative effort involved.

I've been trying to determine the EES imbalances on Dominion and I'm not having much luck.  Dominion gave me the ENA balances over the phone.  When I called back a day later to get the EES balances, I was told to submit a written request to Bill Saviers, Dominion's in house counsel.  I have not done that.  I would prefer that Dominion provide us a written document stating what the pool balances are as of 11/30/01 and 12/31/01.

Based on the pool balances below, I would recommend terminating the ENA pools effective 12/3/01 assuming the following.
	1.  Producer payments for Oct and Nov have not been made and go into the pre-petition bucket.
	2.  ENA owes Dominion gas which is also pre-petition.
	3.  The producers will be able to reallocate their gas for December forward to another marketer's pool.

Items to consider
If we terminate the pools on 12/31/01 or later, ENA will need to sell the imbalance gas and pay the producers.  Dominion will need to provide ENA a method to do this if the pools are terminated.  I would recommend paying the producers after we collect the money for selling the imbalance gas AND after we pay Dominion any gathering/transporting charges associated with those balances.  The volumes are small so ENA will not see much economic benefit from this process.  Also, the administrative effort involved is VERY VERY HIGH due to the small volumes per producer.

Dominion will prefer to cancel the pools with a 0 or positive imbalance.  On 12/3/01, ENA will still have a negative cumulative imbalance.

Most of the producers have not been paid for Oct or Nov 2001 activity.  I assume that since those dollars go into a pre-petition bucket that we should not terminate any producer contracts before 12/3/01.

3/5/02 Per Vickie Coen at Dominion
ENA Pool Balances as of
			11/30/01	12/31/01
Gath North		1,323		2,187
Tran North		0		0
Gath South		(26,482)		31,583
Tran South		5,412		8,143

Cumulative		(19,747)		41,913

Dominion IF Prices
Mar 2002	$2.59
Feb 2002	$2.20
Jan 2002	$2.79
Dec 2001	$2.42
Nov 2001	$3.37
Oct 2001	$2.02
Sep 2001	$2.42


[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE][IMAGE][IMAGE]


-----Original Message-----
From: dmatthews@nyse.com [mailto:dmatthews@nyse.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 10:01 AM
To: Koenig, Mark
Subject: Press Release

Dear Mark,

As discussed, attached is the suspension release that the NYSE will be releasing
at 12:00pm today EST. Should you have any questions regarding the release,
please call Glenn Tyranski at 212.656.5142.

As you requested, the contact information for the OTC Bulletin Board is Bob
Nesbit 240.386.5074 or Ken Worm 240.386.5121. Please let us know if you have any
questions or if we can do anything else to assist you.

Best regards,

Darcey Matthews
Director

(See attached file: Enron Suspension Release Final.doc)


[IMAGE]
NCI Marketing Web Alert

[IMAGE]Don

 [IMAGE] Fingerhut.comSpecial e-mail offer   Shop now for the holidays with this special introductory offer! [IMAGE][IMAGE][IMAGE][IMAGE][IMAGE] Place your first order at Fingerhut.com and get FREE SHIPPING & HANDLING on almost every product on our site!   We make it easy to shop for the holidays, whether you want decorations for your home, cookware for making a holiday feast or the latest DVD player for a great gift. You'll find it all in our Holiday Store!   Plus, stop in for some seasonal fun - send a Santa  E-mail or a holiday e-card!  [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   Plus, sign up at Fingerhut.com to enjoy:   Faster Ordering and Checkout  Instant Order Status   Exclusive E-mail Offers    We have it all for you at Fingerhut.com!    Name-Brand Quality  Thousands of Products  Real-Time Product Availability Check  Online Giveaways and Sweepstakes  Apply for the Fingerhut Credit Advantage
 Card  Total Online Security [IMAGE]  Shop Fingerhut.com today!

 You are receiving this special offer because you have provided permission to receive third party email communications regarding special online promotions or offers. If you do not wish to receive any further messages from Network Commerce, please click here  to unsubscribe. Any third-party offers contained in this email are the sole responsibility of the offer originator. Copyright ? 2001 Network Commerce Inc.


---------------------- Forwarded by Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT on 10/27/2000 03:02
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Jared Kaiser                           10/26/2000 04:19 PM

To: Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Women and motorcycles don't mix!

---------------------- Forwarded by Jared Kaiser/HOU/ECT on 10/26/2000 04:19
PM ---------------------------

Joe A Casas
10/26/2000 04:12 PM
To: Jared Kaiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen@CCMAIL
cc:
Subject: Women and motorcycles don't mix!

---------------------- Forwarded by Joe A Casas/HOU/ECT on 10/26/2000 04:11
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Victor Lamadrid                           10/26/2000 03:40 PM

To: Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beverly Beaty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tricia
Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe A Casas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sabra L Dinari/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Clarissa Garcia/HOU/ECT@ECT, Meredith Mitchell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cindy
Vachuska/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jesse Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alvin
Thompson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Edward
Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angie Zeman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cynthia
Franklin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steve Gillespie/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert E
Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Loving/NA/Enron@ENRON, Lia Halstead/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Christina Sanchez/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Women and motorcycles don't mix!

While we wait for Unify to work.....here's a funny!!!!

 - Evilke~1.mpe


Daren:
There is a spot deal and an exchange deal for 9/6.  The spot deal is 391119
and the exchange deal is 231758.  They both have the same volume scheduled,
10,545 MMBtu.  Which deal do we use?  Duke shows the volume on the exchange
deal.  There is also spot deal 387571 for day 6, but I think it's OK.  The
deal was for 30,000 MMBtu and we have an actual of 29,420 MMBtu

Megan


Start Date: 1/23/02; HourAhead hour: 3;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002012303.txt
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database


Looks great. Is it a fraternity or sorority. Love, Dad PS Mom is home.

-----Original Message-----
From: Tajmajulie@aol.com [mailto:Tajmajulie@aol.com]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 12:08 PM
To: Buy, Rick
Subject: Third time's a charm

I'm attaching the final copy of my resume, already critiqued by my advisor and ready to be sent to companies.  See what you think when you get a second.  I added a few projects and computer skills and changed a few classes.  Hope you're having a good day at work.

Cheers loser,
Jules


i will change the tkts

---------------------- Forwarded by Joe A Casas/HOU/ECT on 03/23/2000 08:14
AM ---------------------------

mstiles@columbiaenergygroup.com on 03/23/2000 07:28:33 AM
To: " - *Bizik, Kim" <knovsek@columbiaenergygroup.com>
cc: " - *jcasas2@enron.com" <jcasas2@enron.com>, " -
*Steve.Gillespie@enron.com" <Steve.Gillespie@enron.com>
Subject: Re: DPL OFO ISSUED

DPL has issued a revised OFO for Thursday the 23rd and Friday the 24th.  I
will
need to adjust my volumes as follows:

23rd - cut volume of 883 to 723 dth on TGT K# 6057 (was originally 1203 dth)

24th - cut volume of 823 to 622 dth on TGT K# 6057 (was originally 1203 dth)

25th - cut volume of 1203 to 662 dth on TGT k#6057

Effective the 26th - 31st, please keep my volumes at 1203 dth per day.

DPL may revise the 24th and 25th tomorrow.   I will update you tomorrow.
Thanks for your help.   (Kim is out today so you will need to contact me with
any questions).


who is the trader?

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Hello!  Will and I decided this would be a good way to ask for assistance
from the TFA national board members residing in Houston. TFA-H is enjoying
incredible momentum right now--so much so that we are once again in dire
need of computers. We have made contact with several companies and have some
corporate proposals under consideration, but those are "down the road"
relationships assuming they work out as planned.   Please reach out to
anyone and everyone to make them aware of TFA-Houston and how much the
contribution of retired computers means to the disadvantaged neighborhoods
and schools that we serve.  We have a request in to Exxon Mobil Upstream
Research as I understand Exxon is replacing 40K desktops with laptops.  I
haven't been able to make headway with Exxon Mobil yet--if you can assist
with trying to obtain their retired computers, that would excellent.  This
could help our efforts across the country.

UPDATE:  We have now assisted 74 organizations and have a backlog of demand.
This Saturday, November 11, we will provide 75 computers to 4 organizations.
This will deplete our inventory.  We have several partnerships in the making
that will greatly increase the demand for our services. This week I also
participated in a meeting headed by the Mayor's office to bring the
technology and economic providers of the Enhanced Enterprise Community
together to see how we can effectively collaborate.  Judging by the interest
of my post-meeting conversations, this will also generate considerable
demand for our services.  We want to be able to deliver what we say we can
since we are now moving to the forefront of digital divide efforts in
Houston.

Thank you for your commitment and willingness to serve the cause of
eliminating the digital divide in Houston!   We are making a difference in
the lives of thousands of children and their families--let's keep moving
forward. I have attached an information sheet that you can use if you need
it as well as a list of the equipment we can use.   I have also included an
update of the progress of TFA-Houston.  Please email or call if you have
questions.

Lois Powers
Executive Director
Technology For All-Houston
3403 Marquart, Suite 204
Houston, TX  77027
PH:  713-961-0012

 <<about tfa word version.doc>>       <<Minimum Standards.doc>>  <<board
update 102000.doc>>

 - about tfa word version.doc
 - Minimum Standards.doc
 - board update 102000.doc


Brad,  Please reviewed the attached before we send to MidCon for their
review.  Pay particular attention to the pressure committment sections.
Thanks.


***************************************************************
Do you want to give your child a head start in school?
Try Hooked on Phonics. $20 Instant Savings - Click here!
http://quinst.com/clk/mogelepgeichimmalt
***************************************************************

The Word of the Day for October 29 is:

petulant   \PEH-chuh-lunt\   (adjective)
     1 : insolent or rude in speech or behavior
    *2 : characterized by temporary or capricious ill humor
: peevish

Example sentence:
     "'What is it all about?' cried Dorian in his petulant way,
flinging himself down on the sofa." (Oscar Wilde, _The Picture
of Dorian Gray_)

Did you know?
     "Petulant" is one among many English words akin to or
derived from the Latin verb "petere," which means "to go to,"
"to attack," "to seek," or "to request." "Petere" is a relative
of the Latin adjective "petulans, petulantis" ("impudent"), from
which "petulant" was derived. Some other words that are related
to "petere" are "compete" and "appetite." "Competere," the Latin
precursor to "compete," is a joining of the prefix "com-" with
the verb "petere." The joining of "ad-" and "petere" led to
"appetere" ("to strive after"), and eventually to "appetitus,"
the source of our "appetite."  Additional descendants of "petere"
are "petition," "perpetual," and "impetus."

*Indicates the sense illustrated in the example sentence.

----------------
Brought to you by Merriam-Webster, Inc.
http://www.Merriam-Webster.com
----------------

***************************************************************
Do you have the skills you need to get a good job?
If you want to secure your future, you need training.
http://links.quinstreet.com/adclick?area=fensuihagunduo
***************************************************************

Subscribe or unsubscribe to Word of the Day via the Web at:
http://www.Merriam-Webster.com/service/subinst.htm

To join the list via e-mail, send a blank e-mail to:
mw-wod-subscribe-request@listserv.webster.m-w.com
To leave the list via e-mail, send a blank e-mail to:
mw-wod-signoff-request@listserv.webster.m-w.com

Questions about your subscription?
Write to: mw-wod-request@listserv.webster.m-w.com
Questions or comments about the Word of the Day?
Write to: word@Merriam-Webster.com

(c) 2001 by Merriam-Webster, Incorporated


Bryce,

I am not comfortable with bringing someone in without an agreement.  I should
have a draft to you this afternoon at the latest, so it should not be a
problem for the person to start tomorrow.  I will ask my assistant, Twanda,
to send you the confidentiality agreement that we require all contract
personnel to sign so that you can get it to the person for signature today.

Michelle

	Bryce Baxter
	05/15/2000 08:40 AM

		 To: Norma Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Staffing

Do you have any concerns/issues with Rebecca's proposal below to start the
contractor without the formal contract in place?
---------------------- Forwarded by Bryce Baxter/HOU/ECT on 05/15/2000 08:39
AM ---------------------------

"Rebecca P. Soots" <rpsoots@esc-hdq.com> on 05/12/2000 07:39:20 PM
To: "Bryce Baxter (E-mail)" <bryce.baxter@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Staffing

Hi Bryce,

In discussing the difficulties in getting this contract in place to meet
both your needs and Mr. Lloyds, it was brought to my attention that since we
have already established a good working relationship with Enron that we
would not have a problem allowing Mr. Lloyd to begin working without an
official contract in place.  I do not know how your management would feel
about a letter of proposal, which would serve as a temporary work
authorization until the final contract is in place but it is something that
ESC is willing to do.  Assuming Ms. Cash is able to pull together the Master
Service Agreement by Monday and everything is agreeable to ESC then it
obviously would not be necessary to implement a temporary work
authorization.  However, should we run into further obstacles, I wanted to
share with you this possible opportunity.

One of the things that I wanted to discuss with you is your remaining
staffing requirements.  I am not sure I have a clear picture of the exact
skills you are looking for and would like to avoid sending you resumes which
do meet your needs.  Also, how many candidates are you looking to bring on?

I look forward to hearing from you, hopefully we'll be luckier with the
phones next week...

Thank You,

Rebecca P. Soots
Manager
Enterprise Services Company
713.219.4234
Rpsoots@esc-hdq.com
Fax - 713.270.7195


Welcome to s+b's enews, an exclusive added-value from  srategy+business.

This Week:
Security, Strategy, and the Commercial Enterprise
By Ralph Shrader and Mike McConnell

Washington, November 2, 2001 - President George W. Bush has confirmed what many of us in business already understood intuitively: The new war on terror will be fought not just by governments and soldiers, but also by the companies, large and small, that comprise the global economy - the terrorists' real target.

"Terrorists want to turn the openness of the global economy against itself," the President told executives attending the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation forum in Shanghai recently. "We must not let them."

If we are to surmount the grueling test the free world now confronts, we must adapt both national and corporate strategies toward an unfamiliar but absolutely necessary goal: promoting openness and maintaining security at the same time.

Rising to that challenge, though, will not be easy. Our whole way of doing business has long been evolving toward greater openness and more individual empowerment. But as the assaults of September 11 have shown, transparency and empowerment allow technological, political, and social forces, abroad and at home, to threaten us. Yet to withdraw into protectionism, while a natural instinct, will prove far deadlier than Al Qaeda and its associates.

To read the full analysis go to:

http://www.strategy-business.com/press/enewsarticle/?art=27934&pg=0

** Please note: strategy-business.com has a new look and new features. You may need to register to read this enews and other content on the Web site. **

-------------------------------

s+b's enews is an exclusive platform for e-business analysis, insights, commentary, and other intellectual capital from the authors, strategists, and editors at strategy+business.

Randall Rothenberg
Editor-in-Chief
strategy+business

-------------------------------
To unsubscribe to this e-mail alert, visit

http://www.strategy-business.com/settings and follow the instructions to change your preferences.


Stan,

Here's the latest message points from EEI regarding retail standards.

Jeff
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Brown/HOU/EES on 07/19/2000 09:59 AM
---------------------------

"Michael McGrath" <MMcGrath@eei.org> on 07/19/2000 08:28:52 AM
To: <Burrell.G.Kilmer@bge.com>, <geoffrey.green@cmpco.com>,
<JTG@dps.state.ny.us>, "Alice Travis" <ATravis@eei.org>, "Charles Foster"
<CFoster@eei.org>, "Elizabeth Stipnieks" <EStipnieks@eei.org>, "William
Mayer" <WMayer@eei.org>, <jbrown1@enron.com>, <nhetrick@enron.com>,
<Cacquard@erols.com>, <Rbrown@exeloncorp.com>, <jbladen@newenergy.com>,
<refuller@nyseg.com>, <jcunningham@paea.org>, <bbradley@peco-energy.com>,
<bdcrowe@peco-energy.com>, <jmminneman@pplweb.com>,
<craig.glazer@puc.state.oh.us>, <cherie-broadrick@reliantenergy.com>,
<keith-sappenfield@reliantenergy.com>, <deichenlaub@scc.state.va.us>,
<ccraven1@txu.com>, <sharon.b.grove@ucm.com>, <kathy.smith@us.abb.com>
cc:
Subject: Future of Retail UBP

Attached are talking points expressing my view of where we've been and where
we are going.

Comments appreciated!

We will doscuss next steps in the Advisory Cmte conference call tomorrow.

Thanks
  -Mike

 - UBP.advcmte.talkingpoints.doc


Sir,

1.  Deal 1108335 - we show a fixed price of $2.20 and SPPC invoiced at $2.26.  They returned our confirm showing disagreement to our price.

Thanks,

Sean Riordan
x54298


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/02/2001 10:45 AM -----

	Lynnette Barnes
	03/02/2001 09:36 AM

		 To: Tom Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marchris Robinson/NA/Enron@Enron, Bill
Moore/NA/Enron@Enron, Howard Fromer/NA/Enron@Enron, Frank
Rishe/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve Montovano/NA/Enron@Enron, Daniel
Allegretti/NA/Enron@Enron, Gloria Ogenyi/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Robert Frank/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary Schoen/NA/Enron@Enron, Ron
McNamara/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Stacey Bolton/NA/Enron@Enron, Patrick
Keene/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Stella
Chan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robert
Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Roy Boston/HOU/EES@EES,
Barbara A Hueter/NA/Enron@Enron, bmerola@newpower@EES, Susan M
Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron, Janine Migden/NA/Enron@Enron, bmerola@newpower.com,
Geoff Duda/HOU/EES@EES, kmagruder@newpower.com, pbray@newpower.com,
sbertin@newpower.com, scovino@newpower.com, treichel@newpower@EES, Robin
Kittel/NA/Enron@Enron, John Neslage/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: RDI - Ca Island won't work


please schedule
----- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 04/10/2001 09:13 AM -----

	John Schwartzenburg@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	04/09/2001 01:11 PM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EEOSC Update

I would like to schedule a tim on Wednesday afternoon with you to take you
through the EEOSC monthly report.  I will be out Thursday and Friday, so
thenext opportunity would be the following week. Nothing too urgent, I just
think you might wnat to know a little about what's going on over here.

JWVS


It worked,  You guys are officially online now.  Everything here is fine.

I will likely have a roommate in the next couple of weeks.  A friend of mine
who also works at Enron is moving back to Houston from Portland.  This will
work out great and also help me with the mortgage payments.

Take care and talk to you later.

Gerald


Does Vanessa know anything about this?  I know that we had a definite
interest several years ago in a system from Siebel.  We shelved it at the
time due to IT resource constraints and Philippe's concern over costs.  In
the meantime, EES bought a license and uses this system.  I know that Mary
was resurrecting this with someone on her team.  She had recently reviewed it
with Brenda Herod, I believe.  This is one of the items that we listed in
Dallas as a need if we were to get heavily into providing services for
others.  --Sally
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 04/04/2001 08:27 AM
---------------------------

Richard Sage
04/03/2001 05:25 PM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: CRM system

Sally,
I gather that Mary has taken extended leave.
Can you advise who might know anything about this system?

Thanks,
Richard

---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Sage/LON/ECT on 03/04/2001 23:22
---------------------------

Richard Sage
19/03/2001 15:59
To: Mary Solmonson/Enron@EnronXGate
cc:

Subject: CRM system

Mary,
Are you around - your voicemail message has said you were out for the day,
for weeks.
We have a need for a CRM system, but not a very complicated one, and I
thought that the one that Tony Mends demonstrated a couple of years ago might
fit the bill. He tells me that it is in your area of responsibilities!

Thanks,
Richard


---------------------- Forwarded by Allison Navin/Corp/Enron on 06/07/2000
05:24 PM ---------------------------

"Andrea Spring" <aae@dellnet.com> on 06/07/2000 05:02:03 PM
To: "'Allison Navin \(E-mail\)'" <Allison_Navin@enron.com>, "'Anthony Foti
\(E-mail\)'" <AFOTI@AKINGUMP.COM>, "Art Brownell \(E-mail\)"
<AWBrownell@aol.com>, "'Bill Paxon \(E-mail\)'" <bpaxon@akingump.com>,
"'Cynthia Sandherr \(E-mail\)'" <Cynthia_Sandherr@enron.com>, "David N.
Friedman \(E-mail\)" <david_friedman@afandpa.org>, "Donn Salvosa \(E-mail\)"
<DSalvosa@epsa.org>, "'Gay H. Friedmann \(E-mail\)'" <gfriedmann@ingaa.org>,
"'Gene Peters \(E-mail\)'" <gpeters@epsa.org>, "'Henry Hubbard \(E-mail\)'"
<hubbardh@fleishman.com>, "'Jamie Tucker \(E-mail\)'" <jtucker@akingump.com>,
"'Jane Turner \(E-mail\)'" <jane_turner@afandpa.org>, "'Jim McIntire
\(E-mail\)'" <jim_mcintire@cmahq.com>, "'Jim McVaney \(E-mail\)'"
<jim_mcvaney@cmahq.com>, "'John Runyan \(E-mail\)'" <john.runyan@ipaper.com>,
"'John Sparkman \(E-mail\)'" <jssparkman@papl.com>, "John Stinson \(E-mail\)"
<jmstinson@worldnet.att.net>, "'Karen Penafiel \(E-mail\)'"
<kpenafie@boma.org>, "'Katie Strong \(E-mail\)'" <kstrong@AKINGUMP.COM>,
"'Kevin O'Donovan \(E-mail\)'" <nymex1@unidial.com>, "Kim Brooks \(E-mail\)"
<kbrooks@nam.org>, "'Kim Martin \(E-mail\)'" <martinki@fleishman.com>, "'Marc
Yacker \(E-mail\)'" <myacker@elcon.org>, "'Mark L. Kemmer \(E-mail\)'"
<mark.l.kemmer@gm.com>, "'Mark Whitenton \(E-mail\)'" <mwhitenton@nam.org>,
"Nina Plaushin \(E-mail\)" <nplaushin@ppl.com>, "Paulette Pidcock \(E-mail\)"
<paulette.pidcock@pge-corp.com>, "'Steve Kline \(E-mail\)'"
<steven.kline@pge-corp.com>
cc:

Subject: Bliley transmission language

This is Chairman Bliley's "discussion draft," which he just released to the
Republican members.  Evidently, this is what he views as the essential
component of a bill, and he's invited members to build on this.  This
section contains transmission language, which clarifies that FERC has
jurisdiction over both bundled and unbundled transmission.  Bliley believes
that this language is "the start, understanding it and building on it, is
the next step."

_______________________________
Andrea Spring
Executive Director
Americans for Affordable Electricity
1101 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Suite 200
Washington, DC 20004
phone: 202-347-6371
fax: 202-393-4637
e-mail: aspring.aae@dellnet.com

 - sectionbysection.wpd
 - summarydoc.wpd
 - 005_.PDF


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/
 - DQ -resume current.doc


The Approval status has changed on the following report:

Status last changed by: Sherri Sera
Expense Report Name: Dues and forum fees
Report Total: $1,049.00
Amount Due Employee: $1,049.00
Amount Approved: $1,049.00
Amount Paid: $0.00
Approval Status: Accounting Review
Payment Status: Pending

To review this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://xms.enron.com


Greg, Liz,

Here are the instructions how to get to Stinson's house.

Directions from major freeways:

From Southwest Freeway (59):
 Exit on Buffalo Speedway and go south.  (Greenway plaza is on the north side
of the freeway.)
 Pass through stoplights on Bissonette, Sunset, Rice, and University.
 Turn right on Cason  (the last small street before the next stoplight, which
is at Holcomb Blvd.)
 House is on your left in 2.5 blocks.

From  West Loop 610 :
 Exit on Bellaire Blvd. and go east  (inside the loop).
 After you pass the stoplights at Auden and at Edloe street,  start watching
for JiffyLube on your right.
 When you near JiffyLube, turn LEFT onto Sewanee Street.
 At first intersection, turn Right onto Cason
 House is on your right.

 If you miss the turn at JiffyLube, just turn LEFT at the stoplight at
Buffalo and turn left again onto Cason.

Vince


No rush.  Whenever it's convenient for you.  Just let me know, and let me when you need the check  and for how much.

Kisses,
Jeff

Go Giants!  Go Barry!

PS  Just wait'll next year!

-----Original Message-----
From: Nancy Sellers [mailto:Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 2:23 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: RE: Results for Week "4" and Week "5" pick sheet

Things are ok but not very.  When do you want the wine?  I could get the
Coastal right away, but I just ordered the 97 cab this morning and we are
only allowed 12 bottles at a time.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@ENRON.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 12:15 PM
To: Nancy Sellers
Subject: RE: Results for Week "4" and Week "5" pick sheet

Hey, babe, how's things?  You get your glasses?  When we gonna get
together again for a Spades massacre?

Could you order me one case of coastal cab, one of coastal zin and one
of Mondavi 1997 cab?

Kisses,
Jeff

PS  Last night Prentice made the most delicious porcini risotto from a
veal stock that she and Cameron made!  It was truly (no kidding)
incredible.

-----Original Message-----
From: Nancy Sellers [mailto:Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 2:10 PM
To: 'eldon@direcpc.com'; Andre Mozes (E-mail); Andy Bledsoe (E-mail 2);
Andy Bledsoe; Art Narverud (E-mail); Barrie Eddy (E-mail 2); Barrie
Eddy; Bill Growney (E-mail 2); Bill Growney (E-mail); Cameron Sellers
(E-mail); CaryPlatkin (E-mail) (E-mail); Chris & Cristina Shea (E-mail);
Christopher J. Shea (E-mail); Cristina M. Shea (E-mail); Cindy Nagy;
Daryl Anderson (E-mail); David Evans (E-mail); 'Denis Kenny'; Donna
Usnick (E-mail); Greg Brady; Hank Salvo; Dasovich, Jeff; John and Miriam
Kartozian (E-mail); Ken Webster (E-mail 2); Kent Deverell (E-mail);
Lynne Kenny (E-mail); Michael Herring (E-mail 2); Mickey Lombardi; Mike
Herring (E-mail) (E-mail); Nancy Sellers; Pat Delong (E-mail 2); Patrick
DeLong; Prentice Sellers (E-mail 2); Scott Laughlin (E-mail); Sean
Maloney (E-mail); Valerie Deitrick
Subject: Results for Week "4" and Week "5" pick sheet

Eldon is having some computer problems, so I am sending this out.  It
might
be a good idea to copy me on your e-mail picks this week.
NANCY.SELLERS@ROBERTMONDAVI.COM

Let's hear it for the 49'er faithful!  All four of this week's winners
put
their money on the Niners!

 1st place - NARVCO - also the ONLY person to take Baltimore over
Denver!
 2nd place - HANK - hey, wait a minute - he's a RAIDERS fan!
 3rd place - ELDON
 4th place - GROWNEY

4 more people sat down thanks to the Colts and the Jaguars:  Andy,
Daryl,
Eldon and Kent - leaving 16 people in the pool.

Attached also is the pick sheet for "Week 5"

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Mark wanted me to send this to you.
---------------------- Forwarded by Ann M Schmidt/Corp/Enron on 03/29/2000
01:16 PM ---------------------------

Meredith Philipp
03/22/2000 01:25 PM
To: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sarah Palmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ann M
Schmidt/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Important

Can we please order this stamp?
---------------------- Forwarded by Meredith Philipp/Corp/Enron on 03/22/2000
01:20 PM ---------------------------

Kristen_Bumgardner@spc.com on 03/16/2000 10:29:26 AM
To: ama@dn.zhgm.com, elizabeth_brewer@foleys.com, meredith_philipp@enron.com,
Robin_Etka@spc.com
cc:

Subject: FUNNY!

--------------- cc:Mail Forwarded ---------------
From:     "Rebecca Hollas" <rhollas@darlinghomes.com> AT TIME_INC
Date:     03/16/2000 12:18 PM
To:       Kristen Bumgardner AT TIBHSPC3
To:       "Laura Slough" <lslough@darlinghomes.com> AT TIME_INC
To:       "Maureen (E-mail)" <mblair@lennar.com> AT TIME_INC
To:       "Ashley (E-mail)" <ashham64@hotmail.com> AT TIME_INC
To:       "Shell (E-mail)" <Shelvis59@yahoo.com> AT TIME_INC
Subject:  FUNNY!

 - Stamp.jpg


Lara--well, we finally won a battle in Illinois, but it took us going to the
appellate court to do it!  Lara, I know that you've been out of this area for
quite awhile, but thanks for your help with the Piper Marbury Rudnick firm on
preparing and editing the arguments before the court.

John/Jim/Harry--I am wondering if this decision can be added to our
accomplishment list that you are working on. This case is very old (I think
we argued it over a year ago).   Have we been able to monetize this type of
affiliate rule in the past or is this one of the items that are somewhat
intangible, but get included anyway?
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan M Landwehr/HOU/EES on 09/10/2000
05:23 PM ---------------------------

Roy Boston
09/08/2000 11:25 AM
To: "Townsend, Christopher J. - CHI" <chris.townsend@piperrudnick.com> @ ENRON
cc: Janine Migden, Susan Landwehr, mharada@enron.com, Adam Cooper
Subject: Re: Illinois Appellate Court Affirms Affiliate Transaction Rules

Chris and David -- Great news and even greater results for the team.  The ICC
should look long and hard at this opinion when they consider what approach to
take towards gas affiliated interest rules.  Some commissioners want to issue
very limited rules for gas -- this opinion clearly indicates that limits are
necessary.

"Townsend, Christopher J. - CHI" <chris.townsend@piperrudnick.com> on
09/08/2000 11:07:58 AM
To: "'Susan_M_Landwehr@enron.com'" <Susan_M_Landwehr@enron.com>,
"'RBoston@enron.com'" <RBoston@enron.com>
cc: "'lleibma@ect.enron.com'" <lleibma@ect.enron.com>, "Montana, James S.,
Jr. - CHI" <James.Montana@piperrudnick.com>, "Fein, David I. - CHI"
<david.fein@piperrudnick.com>, "Skey, Christopher N. - CHI"
<christopher.skey@piperrudnick.com>
Subject: Illinois Appellate Court Affirms Affiliate Transaction Rules

> We received word today that the Fifth District of the Illinois Appellate
> Court issued its Opinion affirming the Illinois Commerce Commission's
> order adopting final rules to implement the affiliate transactions rules.
> The Court found that the ban on joint advertising and marketing was an
> appropriate restriction upon commercial speech.  After conducting the
> required four-part test to determine the appropriateness of the ban on
> commercial speech, the Court concluded that the ban passed constitutional
> muster.  The Court sided with Enron, concluding that "joint marketing
> could lead to discrimination between affiliates and unaffiliated ARES
> because of customer confusion and the creation of entry barriers."
>
> The Court also rejected assertions from Ameren and Illinois Power that
> some of the rules illegally regulate "competitive services" and that other
> rules are arbitrary and capricious or not supported by substantial
> evidence.  The Appellate Court seemed to appreciate the importance of the
> affiliate rules, concluding that "these rules are necessary to accomplish
> the General Assembly's goal of providing a competitive market for the
> provision of electric service. Without these rules, utilities would be
> able to provide their affiliates with competitive advantages that are not
> available to the unaffiliated ARES, thereby defeating the
> nondiscrimination between affiliated and unaffiliated ARES that the
> Customer Choice Law seeks to accomplish."
>
> In short, Enron obtained a complete and total victory in the Appellate
> Court.  Attached is a link to the Court's Opinion.
>
> Enron is now 2-0 in the Illinois Appeallate Courts, having recently
> received a decision affirming the Commission's order that revised Illinois
> Power Company's Rate RTP (Real Time Pricing).
>
> As always, if you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate
> to contact us.
>
>
>  <<Illinois Power Co. v. Commerce Comm'n, No. 5-98-0808.url>>
>
>  http://www.state.il.us/court/2000/5980808.htm
>
>
> Christopher J. Townsend
> Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe
> 203 N. LaSalle Street
> Chicago, IL 60601
> (312) 368-4039 (direct line)
> (312) 630-6300 (direct fax)
> christopher.townsend@piperrudnick.com
>

____________________________________________________________________________
The e-mail address and domain name of the sender changed on November 1,
1999.  Please update your records.

The information contained in this communication may be confidential, is
intended only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be legally
privileged.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please re-send this communication to
the sender and delete the original message and any copy of it from your
computer system.
Thank you.

For more information about Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe, please visit us at
http://www.piperrudnick.com/
____________________________________________________________________________

 - Illinois Power Co. v. Commerce Comm'n, No. 5-98-0808.url


Please find the summary of today's activity on EnronOnline.  The full
Management Report is attached below this executive summary

External Trading ) December 28, 1999
 December 28 To Date

N.A. Gas
Number of Transactions 208 4,409
Volume of Transactions (mmbtu,s) 54,886,005 877,084,085
Gross Notional Value $ 46,187,736 977,617,051

U.S. Power
Number of Transactions 13 136
Volume of Transactions (MWh,s) 68,934 1,556,468
Gross Notional Value $ 1,620,265 44,512,405

U.S. Coal
Number of Transactions - 16
Volume of Transactions (MWh,s) - 471,750
Gross Notional Value $ - 5,936,175

Norwegian Power
Number of Transactions - 4
Volume of Transactions (MWh,s) - 62,300
Gross Notional Value $ - 949,811

U.S. Pulp & Paper
Number of Transactions - 3
Volume of Transactions (MWh,s) - 1,800
Gross Notional Value $ - 1,107,000

Total
Number of Transactions 221 4,568
Gross Notional Value $ 47,808,001 1,030,122,442

Revenue from Physical N.A. Gas flows to date ($)  74,109,316

Number of New Counterparties transacting today 2
Number of Counterparties having transacted to date 94

Number of Users Logging onto EnronOnline:
External Users with Execution rights 216
External Users with No Execution Rights 115

Regards

Louise