Dear You Corman,

Continental Airlines is committed to meeting new federal requirements regarding checked baggage and airport security fees. In an effort to keep you informed, below are the most recent changes that will affect your travel:

POSITIVE BAG MATCH
Effective January 18, 2002 the Federal Aviation Administration will require a positive bag match for travel within the U.S., its territories and commonwealths. Bags cannot be transported on the aircraft without confirmation that the customer has boarded the aircraft.

DOMESTIC CHECK-IN/ARRIVAL TIME
To ensure compliance with the Positive Bag Match policy without delays or inconvenience, Continental Airlines has changed the boarding time for domestic flights for tickets purchased on or after January 18, 2002. Customers checking baggage must do so at least 30 minutes prior to departure. All customers must be checked in and at the boarding gate no later than 15 minutes prior to scheduled departure. Customers who buy tickets on or after January 18, 2002 who are not at the boarding gate 15 minutes prior to departure are subject to having their reservations canceled, seats released and checked baggage removed from the flight.

SECURITY FEE
The Transportation Security Administration is requiring that airlines collect the September 11th Security Fee of $2.50 per enplanement, not to exceed $5.00 each way or $10.00 per round-trip ticket. This security fee goes into effect for tickets purchased on or after February 1, 2002. It applies to qualifying enplanements from airports in the U.S., its territories and commonwealths. This fee applies to all tickets including frequent flyer reward tickets, two-for-one tickets, tour conductors and infants for whom a fare has been collected.

Continental Airlines continues to make safety our number one priority. Be sure to stay informed with continental.com at:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc4?JHEVCU*lJhktHgQLgkhgEJht*z*UA
before leaving for the airport. We're looking forward to welcoming you onboard!

Sincerely,
Mark F. Bergsrud
Vice President, Marketing
Continental Airlines, Inc.

-----------------------------------------------
If you need assistance please visit:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc4?JHEVCU*lJhktHgQLgkhgEJht*z*VA
View our Privacy Policy at:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc4?JHEVCU*lJhktHgQLgkhgEJht*z*WA

This message was sent to: scorman@enron.com

To subscribe visit:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc4?JHEVCU*lJhktHgQLgkhgEJht*z*XA

To unsubscribe visit:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc4?JHEVCU*lJhktHgQLgkhgEJht*z*YA


There will be a UBSWE Migration TONIGHT....please make sure that you LOG OFF before you leave today.

Monday morning, (2/4/02), you will logon with your Enron NT Account and Password.  You will immediately be forced to change your password (following Enron rules) and your NT ID will stay the same.  Once you've changed your password, and logged off AGAIN, you will see the UBS Warburg Energy Screen....email will not be affected until day one.

Starting Monday, you will receive emails from IT support to explain the HOW TO's for your data that YOU  will need to begin transferring over to UBS.  All material will need to be in compliance with UBS standards and NO documents or emails are to be deleted.  In Outlook the following information will be transferred over by IT: Calendar, Contacts, Tasks, and Notes.  Emails (Inbox, Sent Items and Deleted Items) and folder structure will NOT be migrated.

ALL data MUST be migrated PRIOR to day one (estimated to be 02/08/02 ), as access to Enron data will be disabled Day 1.

Thanks for your immediate help in this matter.

T.Jae Black
East Power Trading
Assistant to Kevin Presto
off. 713-853-5800
fax 713-646-8272
cell 713-539-4760


Point	 Buy/Sale	 Counterparty	 On	 Off	 Price	 Deal #	 Annuity
COB N/S	 B	 BPA	 25	 25	 24.75	 153325
COB N/S	 B	 BPA	 25	 25	 25.35	 153327
COB N/S	 B	 BPA	 50	 50	 27.25	 305699
COB N/S	 B	 BPA	 50	 50	 27.64	 305700
COB N?S	 B	 CRC	 	50	 76	 474381
COB N/S	 S	 MIDESTO	 -7	 -7	 19.3	 3689.4
COB N/S	 S	 SPP	 -25	 	180	 556514
COB N/S Total	 	118	 193
BUSBAR	 B	 BPA	 100	 100	 10.48	 85098
BUSBAR	 S	 BPA	 -50	 -50	 30.75	 246561
BUSBAR	 S	 MCMINN	 -5	 -5	 23.7	 199599
BUSBAR Total	 	45	 45
MC	 B	 BPA	 102	 102	 21.6	 51353	 x
MC	 B	 BPA	 	25	 25.5	 798079	 x
MC	 S	 BPA	 -50	 -50	 30.65	 281938	 x
MC	 S	 BPA	 -50	 -50	 42.75	 447576	 x
MC	 S	 BPA	 -50	 -50	 42.9	 448835	 x
MC	 S	 BPA	 -50	 -50	 72	 600521	 x
MC	 S	 BPA	 -50	 -50	 73	 600522	 x
MC	 S	 Air Products	 -6	 -6	 41.19	 737863	 x
MC	 S	 BPA	 -25	 	75	 658386	 x
MC	 S	 BPA	 -14	 	47.5	 664061	 x
MC	 S	 BPA	 	-13	 47.5	 664061	 x
MC	 S	 BPA	 -25	 	31.85	 871641	 x
MC	 S	 BPA	 -25	 	34.5	 822090	 x
MC	 S	 CRC	 	-25	 150	 508906	 x
MC	 S	 DOUGLAS	 -25	 	37.15	 831359	 x
MC	 S	 GRAYS	 -10	 	64	 715879	 x
MC	 S	 INTEL	 -4	 -4	 34.6	 802102	 x
MC Total	 		-282	 -171
Montana	 S	 ASH GROVE	 -6	 -6	 88.25	 891894	 Might be out.
Montana	 S	 LOUISIANA PAC	 -7	 -7	 48	 421598
Montana	 S	 LOUISIANA PAC	 -1	 -1	 34.75	 770040
Montana	 S	 LUZENACA	 	45.11	 406028
Montana Total	 	-14	 -14
NW DEL	 B	 CLATSKAN	 4	 4	 	445159
NW DEL Total	 	4	 4
Grand Total	 		-129	 57

Total MC	 	-237	 -126
Total NW	 	-247	 -136


Hello girls!

I was talking with "on-the-ball" Ayres last night and we were discussing the
bridesmaid's luncheon.  I was thinking a good time would be Friday for a late
lunch (around 1:00).  That would be late enough for morning flights to arrive
and still give us enough time for the rehersal dinner.  But, I want to make
sure
this fits with your schedules because we can always have it on Saturday.  On
Saturday I had planned for us to go get our nails done and hair (optional) but
we can flip flop the days if some of you will not be able to get off on
Friday,
etc.

So, let me know what you think and what your schedule allows!

Hope all is well with you guys!!!!

Love you,
Lisa


That was painful.


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 05/01/2001 01:00 PM -----

	Carol Moffett@EES
	04/27/2001 04:35 PM

		 To: Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Craig Childers/HOU/EES@EES, Marcus
Dotson/HOU/EES@EES, Lamar Frazier/HOU/EES@EES, Chris Holmes/HOU/EES@EES, Evan
Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Douglas Huth/HOU/EES@EES, Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES, Tom
Riley/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES,
Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Dirk vanUlden/Western Region/The Bentley
Company@Exchange, George Waidelich/SFO/EES@EES, Lyle White/HOU/EES@EES, James
Wright/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, Andrew Wu/HOU/EES@EES,
David Gilleland/HOU/EES@EES, Doug Chamberlin/HOU/EES@EES, Don
Black/HOU/EES@EES, Sean A Holmes/HOU/EES@EES, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron,
Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard L Zdunkewicz/HOU/EES@EES, James M
Wood/HOU/EES@EES, Mark Bernstein/HOU/EES@EES, Jeff Golden/HOU/EES@EES, Gary
Weiss/HOU/EES@EES, Mark Dobler/HOU/EES@EES, Eric Melvin/HOU/EES@EES
		 cc: Rosalinda Tijerina/HOU/EES@EES, Roberta Staehlin/HOU/EES@EES, Leticia
Botello/HOU/EES@EES, Pat Kratsch/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange,
Cindy Cicchetti/HOU/EES@EES, Michele Curtis/Western Region/The Bentley
Company@Exchange, Bonnie Baum/HOU/EES@EES, Heather Osheroff/Western
Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, Mariaelena Rivas/HOU/EES@EES, Rachel
Bryant/HOU/EES@EES, Paulett Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Cheryl Brashier/HOU/EES@EES,
Linda Rhymes/HOU/EES@EES, Binky Davidson/HOU/EES@EES, Karen
Street/HOU/EES@EES, Sandy Hoelscher/HOU/EES@EES, Michelle Mayo/HOU/EES@EES,
Rossana Booty/HOU/EES@EES
		 Subject: Agenda - California Planning Session - May 1-2, 2001

Attached is the agenda for next week's planning session.  Please note that
the meeting will take place in Conference Room 8 C1, not Conference Room 872
as previously mentioned.

Attendees
Attend Whole Session	Presenters
	Attend For Your Presentation Only
Dennis Benevides
Craig Childers (optional)
Marcus Dotson
Lamar Frazier
Chris Holmes
Evan Hughes
Doug Huth
Peggy Mahoney
Tom Riley
Mike Smith
Marty Sunde
Dirk vanUlden
George Waidelich
Lyle White
Jim Wright
Andy Wu	David Gilleland
	Doug Chamberlin
	Don Black
	Sean Holmes
	Jeff Dasovich
	Richard Zdunkewicz
	Jim Wood
	Mark Bernstein
	Jeff Golden
	Gary Weiss
	Mark Dobler
	Eric Melvin

Doug Chamberlin:  You may call the conference room at 9:30a Central Time on
Tuesday.  The phone number is (713) 345-3359.

Sue McCubbin:  If you are available to dial into the conference room at
12:30p Central Time on Tuesday, that would be great.  The phone number is
(713) 345-3359.

Rachel and Paulett:  Please note the duration of Don's/Sean's presentation
extends to 11:30a on May 1st.  Thank you.


Phillip, there are a number of alternative systems that will allow the same
level of energy efficiency. I would wait a bit for Wink's bid though. You
say that your panel costs are $20,000 additional. that sounds like a lot. I
just did a panel house with a 2100 sq ft footprint and the total panel cost
was about $25,000 with 8 inch walls and 10 inch roof. Stay in touch and we
can discuss alternatives if that becomes necessary. If your budget is $85-90
per sq. ft.  excluding land costs your costs will be on the low end of the
true custom home level but should be achievable with good management.
Richard Morgan
Manager, Green Building Program
Austin Energy
721 Barton Springs Rd.
Austin, TX 78704-1194
Ph. 512.505.3709
Fax 512.505.3711
e-mail richard.morgan@austinenergy.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Allen, Phillip K. [mailto:Phillip.K.Allen@ENRON.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 9:19 AM
To: Morgan, Richard
Subject:

Richard,

I spoke to you earlier this week with questions about building with
SIP's.  I am planning to build a home in San Marcos as soon as I can
decide on a builder and materials.  I already have my blueprints
completed.  What I took from our conversation  was to use the SIP's with
8.5" roof panels and use a metal roof.

I have been working with Johnnie Brown, a builder from San Antonio that
is also a Creative Panel rep.  The problem is that I have a budget of
$85-$90/sf and it does not appear that he will be able to stay within
that budget.  I don't want to settle for a conventional stick built
house.  I was wondering about alternatives.  Would some combination of a
radiant barrier and non-CFC spray insulation provide close to the same
energy savings at a lower cost than SIP's. For example, I just spoke to
a sales rep for Demilec.  He will spray foam insulation at $1.30/sf.
That would be approximately $10,000 compared to over $20,000 additional
costs for the panels.  But would the foam insulation be as effective?
Do you have any suggestions of materials or contractors that would help
me construct the best home for the money.  I am trying to get a bid from
Wink with Premier based on you reference.

Thank you for your help.

Phillip Allen
pallen@enron.com
713-853-7041

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


I have no changes


I don't think 5:15 is a great time for us, but don't let us keep you from
going to the show.  If you want to go to the early show, we won't be
offended.  We can do something another time.  We would love to do something
with you if you decide against the 5:15 show.

"Larry W. Bass" <lwbthemarine@bigplanet.com> on 04/07/2000 03:05:13 PM
To: eric preston bass <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Dinner

Hi guy. Ain't Misbehaving is the entertainment at  the Great Caruso. They
have 2 shows, 5:15 or 8:45. No room at the inn for the  8:45 show, and we
figured 5 was a little early for you guys. Any  thoughts?-Dad


Hello everyone,

I wanted to get a message out to each of you to update you on the February
23 conference plans.  The conference promises to provide an exciting
opportunity to share the ideas of a diverse group of academic and industry
professionals on a topic that is dear to all our hearts, the future of
business education in the new economy.  I will be sharing updates and
information with you over the weeks to come but thought it might be useful
to start before the holidays.

I am attaching the most recent "description of the program of events" which
remains somewhat fluid as we develop it.  However, there are some new
developments that you will find interesting.  First, I have arranged for
"filming" of the event by our local public TV station and we will be
working toward the development of the best product possible out of the
sessions.  Second, David Palumbo (Human Code--an internet content
provider-http://www.humancode.com/index2.htm- now owned by Sapient) will
join us.  David is very knowledgable about both educational issues (he
served on the faculty of the University of Houston for 10 years before
joining Human Code).  He has some very interesting insights to offer on the
future of higher education having now worked from the industry side of the
equation).  Finally, I am currently reading a couple of books that you may
find interesting (Telecosm and The New Barbarian Manifesto).  I'm sure
there are many more interesting sources of information that you are each
aware of and it would be helpful if we all began sharing our notes.

Finally, let me suggest that each of you begin thinking about the issue(s)
that you feel most comfortable commenting upon and phrasing "lead in"
questions for me.  I would like to build a list of such questions to
circulate among all so that we begin to get a feel for the range of topics
we will encounter in the discussion and begin to formulate our individual
opinions.

I hope that this note finds you all anticipating a wonderful holiday season
and thank you for participating in this inaugural "think tank" conference
on the future of business education.

Sincerely yours,

John
 - Revised Workshop- Planning.doc

John D. Martin
Carr P. Collins Chair in Finance
Finance Department
Baylor University
PO Box 98004
Waco, TX 76798
254-710-4473 (Office)
254-710-1092 (Fax)
J_Martin@Baylor.edu
web:    http://hsb.baylor.edu/html/martinj/home.html


Dave will be out of the office December 23, 2000 until Monday, January 8,
2001.  He will be checking his voicemail and will have his cell phone.

The following are the numbers where he can be reached:

 December 24  thru December 26 - Saskatoon, SK   (306) 374-9587 or Cell
Phone   (713) 907-6315

 December 27 thru January 7 - Fairmont, B.C.  (250) 345-4569 or Cell Phone
(713) 907-6315

Beverly (x 5-7857) will be available to assist you if you need any help
reaching Dave....

Happy Holidays,


then i want a map similar to the one john mckay has asap. thanks brad

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bayer, Adam
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 11:17 AM
To:	Mckay, Brad
Subject:	TCO update

Brad,

I got a better picture of the delay issue when I talked to Keith this morning.  Apparently, his group has lost their server liscence.  As a  consequence they cannot access their materials.  Keith is doing everything he can that does not require the server, and when they regain access, we will get the map out asap.  In the mean time, I am looking into major interconnects as well as storage facilities.  As of now, I don't have a precise timeline on when the server issue will be resolved.  When it occurs, I'll let you know.

Thanks

Adam


Thought you'd like this....
******************************************************************************
**************
 Political  Philosophies: Explained in Simple "Two-Cow" Terms
with an Update for the  state of California

Socialism: You have two cows. You keep one, but  must
give the other to your neighbor.

Communism: You have two cows.  The government takes
both and provides you with milk.

Fascism: You  have two cows. The government takes
both and sells you the  milk.

Bureaucracy: You have two cows. The government
takes them,  shoots one, milks the other, pays you
for the milk, and then pours it down  the drain.

Dictatorship: You have two cows. The government
takes both,  then shoots you.

Capitalism: You have two cows. You sell one and buy
a  bull.

Democracy: You have two cows. The government taxes
you to the  point that you must sell them both to
support a man in a foreign country who  has only one
cow, which was a gift from your own  government.

Corporation: You have two cows. You lay one off,
force the  other to produce the milk of four cows, then
act surprised when it drops  dead.

California: You have two cows. The state tells you how
to milk  your cows, when to milk your cows, how much to
milk your cows and the most  that you can charge for the
milk. You go broke and sell the cows. The state  calls you
greedy and blames you for the current milk shortage.


Please send me a few recommended B&Bs and restaurants.  Thanks for your help.

Kevin

My email at home is kruscitti@aol.com (I think).


Marie,
	I am forwarding to you the documentation Goldman would require regarding the Assignment and Assumption of the Convertible book from ENA to ECT Investments.  When we initially moved Convertible book from ECT Investments to ENA about a year ago, I believe we created our own legal templates based on the primebroker's documents.  Please let me know if there is anything else I can do to help.  I am hoping to get this completed by month end.

Thanks,
Theresa

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Arens, Joseph" <Joseph.Arens@gs.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 12:19 PM
To:	Brogan, Theresa T.
Subject:	FW: Enron

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Troncoso, Alberto
> Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 12:49 PM
> To:	Arens, Joseph
> Subject:	Enron
>
> Joe:
>
> Attached is the Position Transfer certificate we will need in connection
> with each transfer between the 002 accounts we discussed.  We will also
> need the Short Position Assignment Agreement that I previously provided to
> you.  (And which I am attaching again for your convenience.)
>
> Let me know if you or the client have any questions.
>
> Al.
>
>  <<Plain Transfer Cert..doc>>  <<Short Sale Assgienment - not
> automated.doc>>

 - Plain Transfer Cert..doc
 - Short Sale Assgienment - not automated.doc


Start Date: 1/10/02; HourAhead hour: 12;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011012.txt


I don't have all the facts to agree or disagree.  Until John Z has approval to trade currency, I wouldn't think you would want to go down this path.  In addition, I'm sure  you know hegding currency this big and late of Fridays is tough.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lavorato, John
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 11:50 AM
To:	Shankman, Jeffrey A.
Subject:	FW: Currency Hedging

By the way, I agree with Zufferli on this.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Zufferli, John
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 11:46 AM
To:	Hickerson, Gary; Stuart III, William; Lavorato, John; Milnthorp, Rob
Subject:	Currency Hedging

Given the volatility in the gas market (which is the sole impact on the Canadian power book's US dollar exposure) and the exhorbitant cost involved in hedging multi-year cashflows (i.e. as evidenced by Friday 10/19/2001 trade of -$1,200,000 Cdn new deal value for the 14 year swap that I entered into), I will manage the currency exposure of this book myself, I will hedge appropriately when I see fit and will not accept hedges forced on Enron Canada because of arbitrary position limits set by your department.

John Zufferli


Sorry I didn't have much time to talk yesterday.  The presentation went
well.  We had a great turnout and Celeste, Andrew Miles and John Walt (and
the other Enron attendees) did a great job. I'm going to talk to Traci on
Monday.

	Kristin Gandy
	01/29/2001 12:38 PM

		 To: Abhijeet Naik/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Alhamd
Alkhayat/NA/Enron@Enron, Andrew Miles/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian O'Rourke/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Brian_Spector@enron.net, Danielle
Saadia/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, David Dye/HOU/EES@EES,
David Maskell/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Ding
Yuan/Corp/Enron@Enron, Doug Sewell/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Kiani/HOU/EES@EES, John
Walt/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kate Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelli Little/NA/Enron@ENRON,
mary.alison.bailey@enron.com, mcisner@ect.enron.com, Marilyn Baker/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Mark Courtney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Micha
Makowsky/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Michelle
Juden/HOU/EES@EES, Patrick Wade/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul
Quilkey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Pearce W
Hammond/Corp/Enron@Enron, Pushkar Shahi/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rob Wheeler/HOU/EES@EES,
Savita Puthigai/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve Gim/NA/Enron@ENRON, Traci Warner/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, zachary.sampson@enron.com, Aamir
Maniar/NA/Enron@ENRON, John Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Trey Cash/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Jason R Williams/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@ENRON, Pearce W
Hammond/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jaime Gualy/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Courtney/HOU/EES@EES, Brad Alford/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Revision

Presentation time is here!

Logistics are listed below:

What:    Rice MBA Spring Intern Presentation

When:  Thursday, February 1st

Where:  Room 124 in the Business School

Time:   7:30pm - 9:00pm

Please be at the B-school by 7:00pm for set-up and cocktails.  Reception will
take place immediate following the presentation in the Student Lounge.

Please RSVP if you are available to me at extension 53214.

* Resume selection meeting will take place the following Monday, February 5th
at 2pm in room 11C2.

Thank you,

Kristin Gandy
Associate Recruiter


[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
To unsubscribe from the email list, click here [IMAGE]


Cal 02	 $   3.025
Cal 03	 $   3.200
Cal 04	 $   3.255
Cal 05	 $   3.330
Cal 06	 $   3.400
Cal 07	 $   3.480
Cal 08	 $   3.560
Cal 09	 $   3.640
Cal 10	 $   3.720


Attached for your review and comment is a broad outline of a rate proposal to
Caithness for the construction and operation of the 40-mile lateral to the
Big Sandy project.  This non-binding proposal was requested by Caithness'
consultant, George Briden, as a starting point for modeling the economics of
the project's gas supply and a basis for further discussions aimed at
designing an appropriate deal structure.  For your information, James
Centilli calculated the transport rate based on the (+/- 30%) $20.33MM cost
estimate with a ten-year (contract) amortization.

I plan to put this in the mail by the close of business tomorrow.  If you
have any suggestions, please let me hear from you by mid-day.   Thanks.


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron on 12/12/2000
02:18 PM ---------------------------

Steve Hotte
12/12/2000 02:09 PM
To: Bill Cordes/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve
Hotte/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Phil
Lowry/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Danny McCarty/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Rockford
Meyer/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Michael Moran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Gary P
Smith/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Julia White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, James
Prentice/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON
cc: Caroline Barnes/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Gary Kenagy/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Tony
Mayer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bob Martinez/ET&S/Enron, Nick Rahn/GCO/Enron@Enron,
Joanne Bisbee/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lisa Sawyer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michael
Sullivan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Ferguson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mark
Gigliotti/ET&S/Enron, Chris A Smith/OTS/Enron@Enron, Kelly Strader/ET&S/Enron

Subject: E-Mail and Voicemail Retention Policy

The following change in policy to e-mail and voicemail has just come to our
attention.  This change in policy limits our exposure.  This type of exposure
was discussed at this years management conference in San Antonio, listing
examples with Microsoft.  The largest impact of this change is your "sent
mail" retention being reduced to 30 days from the current 365 days.  You will
note that if you move your sent mail to a folder it will be retained for an
entire year which should minimize this impact.  The rationale for the
continued longevity in folders is that if you physically move mail to a
folder you are making a conscious decision to keep that document.

If you have not dealt with folders please give me a call and I can assist you
on their creation and on moving the documents into them.  Unless I hear a
concern, this new policy will be implemented on Friday, December 15th.  Our
help desk will be sending a message to the entire team tomorrow to notify
them of this action.

----- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 11/08/2000 01:52 PM -----

	Mark Frevert@ENRON
	Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
	11/07/2000 09:44 PM

		 To: ENA Employees
		 cc:
		 Subject: E-Mail and Voicemail Retention Policy

As a reminder, ENA,s policy regarding retention of electronic mail, including
Lotus Notes mail, Internet e-mail, cc:mail and voicemail is as follows:

Message Location    Maximum Retention

Inbox       30 Days
Message Log/Sent Mail   30 Days
Trash       Rollover from Inbox for 15 days
Bulletin Boards     30 Days
Folders/Archives    E-mails placed in Folders or Archives ) one year
Voicemail     90 days

E-mail and voicemail older than the maximum retention will be purged
automatically by IT, which is responsible for monitoring compliance with this
policy.  Any exception to this policy requires approval by Mark Haedicke or
Richard Sanders.

Mark Frevert and Mark Haedicke


Reggie Jackson, Mr. October says click here to hear every MLB playoff game.
[IMAGE] 	[IMAGE] 	[IMAGE]
		[IMAGE]
		[IMAGE]
		[IMAGE]
		If you can't hear Reggie, click here.
		[IMAGE]
		To hear every MLB playoff game in GoldPass?, click here.
		[IMAGE]
		[IMAGE]  You are receiving this e-mail because you downloaded  RealPlayer
 or RealJukebox
 from Real.com? and indicated a preference to receive product  news, updates, and special offers from RealNetworks
. If  you do not wish to receive e-mails from us in the future, click on the Remove  Me link below
		[IMAGE]
		remove  me  | privacy  policy
		[IMAGE]
		RealNetworks, RealPlayer, RealJukebox and Real.com are trademarks or registered trademarks of RealNetworks, Inc. All other companies or products listed herein are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners.


Is this a PIG deal?
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/24/2000 12:22
PM ---------------------------

carlos.sole@enron.com on 10/24/2000 10:37:19 AM
To: kay.mann@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Look what I just found on iWon.com!

This page was forwarded to you from the iWon Web site (http://www.iwon.com)

From:   carlos.sole@enron.com
URL:
http://money.iwon.com/jsp/nw/nwdt_ge.jsp?news_id=cmt-292p6870&feed=cmt&date=20
001018

Message:   Is this your deal?

Legal notice: Trade names, trademarks, registered trademarks and service
marks are the property of their respective owners. Any republication or
redistribution of the content contained herein or the Web page is expressly
prohibited

	Daily
$10,000 		Weekly
Prize Club 		Monthly
$1,000,000 		Annual
$10,000,000

5 > iWon	5 > My iWon	7 > Email	9 > Shopping	5 > Prizes	5 > Today's Survey	5 > iWon Today

3 >

	Web  Shopping  MP3

Symbol(s):
Find Symbol

5 > Money home
5 > My Money
5 > Portfolio
3 > Markets
4 > News
3 > Research

4 > Top Business
4 > US Markets
4 > IPO
4 > Internet News
4 > Press Releases
4 > By Industry

	Fuel Cell Developer Dais-Analytic Announces Investment By Enron North America

	Wednesday October 18, 10:01 PM EDT

	ODESSA, Fla., Oct 18, 2000 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ -- Fuel cell
developerDais-Analytic Corp. of Odessa, FL announced today an alliance with
Enron NorthAmerica, a wholly owned subsidiary of Enron Corp.
	As part of the alliance, Enron has made an equity investment in
Dais-Analyticand will support market development, distribution and other
field services forDais-Analytic's fuel cell, humidity control and related
products. Financialdetails of the agreement were not released.
	"Our partnership with Enron provides needed capital to accelerate
thecommercialization of our products," said Timothy Tangredi,
Dais-Analytic'schairman and chief executive officer. "More importantly, it
creates worldwideopportunities for the distribution, sales and service of our
fuel cell powersystems and membrane-based humidity control products."
	Dais-Analytic, created last year from the merger of Dais Corp. of Odessa, FL
andAnalytic Power Corp. of Boston, MA, is a privately held developer of
distributedgeneration fuel cell systems for homes and small businesses as
well as portablefuel cells for backup and standby generators, uninterruptible
power supplies,and hybrid fuel cell/battery electric utility vehicles. Its
patentedtechnologies include low cost fuel cell membranes that are also being
developedfor dehumidification applications.
	SOURCE Dais-Analytic Corp.
	CONTACT:          Glenn Doell of Dais-Analytic Corp.,727-375-8484, ext. 202,
or                  gjd@daisanalytic.comURL:
http://www.daisanalytic.comhttp://www.prnewswire.com
	(C) 2000 PR Newswire. All rights reserved.

	News provided by Comtex. Click here to view end user terms.

		RELATED QUOTES

		Symbol
		Last Trade
		Change
		ENE
		81.31
		-0.6875

		3 >
All quotes delayed up to 20 minutes.

 Click here to email this page to a friend

Quotes supplied by Standard & Poor's ComStock, Inc. Click here forterms and
conditions.
Technology provided by TIBCO Finance Technology, Inc., a Reuters Company.

1 > Money Help
1 >Give Us Your Feedback
1 > Money Glossary

All information provided herein is for informational purposes only, and no
information you may obtain is intended by iWon or its data or content
providers to be relied upon or used for trading or investing purposes. iWon
or its data or content providers are not responsible for the accuracy,
completeness, usefulness or availability of any information, and shall not be
liable for any trading or investment decisions based on such information.


i told you that i was.  you got your way again spoiled brat.  i will be driving home in the nice thunderstorms!  thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 9:26 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

you better have you big jerk

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 9:20 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

yes, i did you spoiled brat

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 9:12 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

really why not

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 9:11 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

nope

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 9:11 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

yep

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 9:10 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

what do you think

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 9:06 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

i dont know yet, did you drive today

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 9:05 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

i will not tell you when i fell asleep.   :)  it is getting cold outside.  what time is your dinner tonight mr. big shot!  :)

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 8:59 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

im ok i didnt go to sleep until 2:30 last night but i feel pretty good, dont get so stressed, it will all work out in the end

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 8:52 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

i can't deal with this crap.  i'm just not going to care anymore.  how shitty is that.  i know, but i will tell you tomorrow.  whatever.  anyway, how are you doing?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 8:50 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

i know im only kidding, tell him its your bday and you want to know now

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 8:49 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

what are you talking about!  so, errol told us that he will talk to us individually tomorrow about whether we will be leaving or not.  that was a nice greeting.  you haven't seen me today.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 8:46 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

you look a little different, i cant figure out what it is

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 8:43 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:

hi!


Paul,

Once the expansion is completed (in the next couple of months), Petrogulf
will have access to all delivery points off Jonah.  They currently don't
have access to Opal.  I think that's all the super secret information I can
divulge.

Hope you have a great weekend.  I have a small wager with Shari Wojta that
the Fightin' Texas Aggies will Beat the Hell Outta CU tomorrow.  Hope I
don't have to eat crow.

See you next week.

kt


Privileged and Confidential
This email contains legal advice

Hoyt and Melissa,

I am assuming that we are discussing contract personnel who provide some sort
of services for MG/RW.  It looks like there may be some key personnel we want
to employ, but that there are many whom we don't want to hire.   I am not
really familiar with the specific facts here.

The question of a joint employer arises when a company treats its contract
personnel like its own -- by setting compensation, controlling their
activities, engaging in promotion/discipline/termination, etc. decisions, and
other ways in which an employer treats its own employees.  So, if the plan is
to have workers doing the same thing, with one as a contractor, and one as an
employee, there could be some issues, particularly if they share a
supervisor.  Unfortunately, that often is the case with contract personnel.

If there are distinctions among the various responsibilities of these workers
-- and like workers are treated similarly -- the risk may be reduced.    It
is cleanest, however, to use all of these workers through the contracting
agency for a while (assume we don't want to hire them all, which is the other
alternative).  Then, the company may want to make selected offers to people
who may be in a managerial role or have some other distinction from the bulk
of the contract workers.

I would like additional information on this situation before reaching a
definitive conclusion.  So, let's try to discuss it.  I am booked until about
11 this morning, but am available after that.

Michelle

Hoyt Thomas@ENRON
08/08/2000 04:21 PM
To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Melissa Laing/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Priviliged and Confidential communication to my attorney Re: Henry
Bath LA

Michelle, I guess emails will get to you sooner if I remember to add you to
the addressee list!  Sorry.

Hoyt
---------------------- Forwarded by Hoyt Thomas/NA/Enron on 08/08/2000 04:20
PM ---------------------------

Hoyt Thomas
08/08/2000 02:01 PM
To: Melissa Laing/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Priviliged and Confidential communication to my attorney Re: Henry
Bath LA

Melissa, my concern is that we may get hit with what is called a
"co-employment suit" in the US.  This is where an agency employee claims that
he/she was treated like an employee, therefore he/she should get employee
benefits (vs. benefits from the agency company, which are probably weak).
Since we did a share purchase of MG, if the agency employees filed a suit
against MG claiming that they are really employees, I think that we would
have to defend it.

I am not an attorney, but I am going to send this to Michelle Cash, who can
advise us on the position we should take.  I would think that if we single
out certain employees to become Enron employees and the remainder stay as
agency employees, this would enhance the legal position of the agency
employees (versus everyone staying as an agency employee).  Michelle, can you
help us with this one?  Thanks.

Melissa, I also think we should minimize distribution on this discussion . .
.

	Enron Europe

	From:  Melissa Laing @ ECT                           08/08/2000 10:57 AM

To: Hoyt Thomas/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Jeanie Slone/LON/ECT@ECT, Melanie Doyle/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Henry Bath LA

Hi Hoyt,

I have today spoken to Ed Dablin regarding Henry Bath LA.  We discussed how
the employees seem to feel that they are Enron employees, although they are
infact agency workers.  Ed confirmed that Martha and half a dozen other
employees quite clearly should become Enron employees and should get
applicable benefits.

The other employees (who are mainly manual employees) he does not feel should
become Enron employees and should remain as agency staff.

He realises that the original granting of Share Options has slightly "muddied
the water" with regard to whether these employees are employees of Enron or
the agency.  He was not involved with the original decision to grant these
employees Share Options.

We discussed the issues (in broad terms, as I could not remember all of the
specific issues) and he is aware that making a limited number of individuals
Enron employees, whilst the others remain agency workers, is not an easy
thing to do.

However, this is his ideal scenario.  How viable is it that we can do this
for him?

He also made the point that Martha is the most senior executive in Henry Bath
Inc. and is one of his most valuable employees.

Regards

Melissa


Great--please make one change for me--change  "influence it" to "comment on
it"  at the end of the first par. of B.  thanks DF

Susan Scott
11/03/2000 02:32 PM
To: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum@ENRON, Shelley Corman, Glen
Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: final draft

Here is what I think is a final draft...I'm going to give it one last read
thru...if you have further comments let me know immediately.  Thanks.


Attached below is a credit worksheet for Interstate Power that Sylvia
Pollan/Deirdre McCaffre has requested.  Please obtain contact/address info
from them.

If you need anything else give me a call.

Thanks,

Veronica Espinoza


Terry-

Our Friday night game is at Pershing now, too??

Susan Pereira

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Terry Lester" <TLESTER@firstunion1.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Terry+20Lester+22+20+3CTLESTER+40firstunion1+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:03 AM
To:	c4009@aol.com; jar7133739@aol.com; jpiper5360@aol.com; PG1315@aol.com; tblackden@aol.com; Pereira, Susan W.; Terry Lester; bobgomez@hal-pc.org; pereira@houston.rr.com; tnreese@houston.rr.com; vwilbeck@houston.rr.com; rothfelder@hypercon.com; connollys3@juno.com; tclester@msn.com; angiodad@swbell.net; applej@swbell.net
Subject:	Soccer

The make up soccer game for the rain out is SUNDAY, October 7, at 4:30 p.m. at the Pershing fields.

Our regular game is Friday at 7:15 p.m. at the Perhsing fields.

Terry Lester


Yahoo! News	Edit Breaking News Alerts - Yahoo!

	Breaking News Alert	 edit
WASHINGTON _ FDA approves new drug to treat rare form of leukemia.

	Click here!
	[IMAGE]

If you no longer wish to receive this alert, click here to unsubscribe.
If you have questions, send us feedback.

Copyright , 1994-2001 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved. Yahoo Privacy Policy


---------------------- Forwarded by Larry F Campbell/NA/Enron on 01/23/2001
12:24 AM ---------------------------

"Karen Van Pelt" <kvanpelt@flash.net> on 12/15/2000 08:35:09 PM
To: "Matt Tedrow" <mtedrow99@hotmail.com>, "Aaron Gregory"
<qeraser@rocketmail.com>, "Angel Backes" <angel.backes@la-z-boy.com>,
"Benjamin Hogan" <muslstang@aol.com>, "Bill Van Pelt" <WVanpelt@aol.com>,
"Billy Van Pelt" <bvanpelt@flash.net>, "Cheryl G." <revayg@yahoo.com>,
"Darrell Hickman" <ashddh@aol.com>, "Dave Welch" <Welch_Dave@provalue.net>,
"Gail Van Pelt" <gmcvp1@aol.com>, "Jill Danker" <ljdanker@hotmail.com>,
"Julie & Matt" <MBoyce4961@aol.com>, "Larry F Campbell" <lcampbel@enron.com>,
"Lesli and Ramzy" <LSabbara@aol.com>, "Michael Campbell"
<physics123@yahoo.com>, "Mike Van Pelt" <kingvp@aol.com>, "Mitch Webb"
<tulsadad@att.net>, "Natasha Pryse" <npryse@hotmail.com>, "Neely Shaw"
<neelyshaw@aol.com>, "Rachelle Bennett" <thefoxs@flash.net>, "Scott Lanehart"
<Slanehart@access-usa.net>, "Sumit Patel" <stp19992000@yahoo.com>, "Tim
Campbell" <a_marine@bellsouth.net>, "Tonishia Van Pelt" <vpsuny@aol.com>,
"Veronica Dare" <vi_dare@yahoo.com>, "Veronica Dare" <veronica-dare@usa.net>
cc:

Subject: Fw: Run Granny Run!

?
 - GRANNYL.MPG


As you requested, attached is the form of NDA for transmittal to your customer:

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Haney, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, September 27, 2001 1:15 PM
To:	Jones, Tana
Subject:	NDA Request for Anglo American

Tana:

Would you please develop an NDA for the following prospective client:

Anglo American plc
20 Carlton House Terrace
London SW1Y 5AN

Contact: Johan Serfontein
Phone: 27-11-373-6800

This will be for a potential private eMarketplace software license sale, similar to my other prospects.

Would you please e-mail me one this afternoon if at all possible?  I am going to send him an e-mail summarizing today's conversation and would like to include this as an attachment.  I'll have Johan get his lawyer to talk to you if they have questions.

Thanks,

Mike

----------------------------------------

Mike Haney
Director, eMarketplace Services
Enron Net Works
713-345-8968
mike.haney@enron.com


Quite good.  They definitely provide a chuckle.


Hi, Rod.

Sorry for the delay in response but I was in a short meeting.  So far I have the following people attending:

Myself
Dian Chu
Amanda Becher
Lucy King

I'm waiting for more responses and will let you know.  Thanks!

Tracey

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayslett, Rod
Sent:	Friday, October 12, 2001 2:12 PM
To:	Kozadinos, Tracey
Subject:	RE: UH 2000 Recruiting Team.xls

Who do you think might be able to make this monday night?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kozadinos, Tracey
Sent:	Friday, October 12, 2001 1:51 PM
To:	Taylor, Corina; Hayslett, Rod
Subject:	RE: UH 2000 Recruiting Team.xls

Hi, Corina.

These names need to be removed as they no longer work here:
Yannis Tzamouranis
George Hope
Aimee Lannou
Jeff McClellan
Murthy Rao
I'm not familar with many of the names.

Please keep:
Dian Chu
Laura Wilkinson
Maribel Mata Monterrey

Please add to the list:
Jacquelyn Azore
Tamera Joyner (HR)
Lucy King
Michelle Akers
Sladana Kulic
Biliana Pehlivanova
I hope to give you more soon.

Regards,
Tracey Kozadinos
Specialist
Risk Assessment & Control
713.853.3446

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Taylor, Corina
Sent:	Wednesday, October 10, 2001 12:41 PM
To:	Hayslett, Rod; Kozadinos, Tracey
Subject:	UH 2000 Recruiting Team.xls

 << File: UH 2000 Recruiting Team.xls >>

Attached is the recruiting team from last year, please review and let me know who you wish to keep on the team, who we should add and who we should delete.

Below is a list of the candidates that accepted our full time offers last year.

Michelle Akers - Started 7/16/01
Sladana Kulic - Started 3/01/01
Lane Merchant - Started 1/02/01  left 06/21/01
Biliana Pehlivanova - Started 2/12/01

Our presentation is scheduled for Monday, October 15, 2001 @ 7:00pm - University Hilton - Shamrock Room 261M

Our interviews are scheduled for Monday, November 12th & Tuesday, November 13th from 8:30 - 5:30 & we will be interviewing both Analyst & Associates.

Please revise your team member list and let me know who will be attending the presentation.  At our last meeting we decided that we would need 8/12 people from Enron there to answer questions, since we expect about 100 people to show up.

I can be reached at 713/ 345-7344.

Corina Taylor
Recruiting Coordinator


In order to better align our engineering and operations capabilities with the
commercial businesses they support, we are pleased to announce the following
organizational change will be effective immediately.  A new business unit,
Enron Engineering and Operational Services (EEOS), is being formed which will
include our existing operations in Enron Engineering and Construction Company
(EE&CC), Operational Energy Corporation (OEC), and National Energy Production
Corporation (NEPCO).

Brian Stanley, as President and Chief Executive Officer, and Keith Dodson, as
Chief Operating Officer will provide the leadership for this new
organization, reporting to the Office of the Chairman of Enron Wholesale
Services.  NEPCO will continue to operate as a stand-alone business under
John Gillis, President.

With the majority of EE&CC and OEC,s activities focused on assets and
projects which are in Wholesale Services, this will better align the efforts
of EEOS with the commercial businesses it supports.  While EEOS will be a
stand-alone unit within Enron Wholesale Services it will work very closely
with and have direct accountability to the business units it supports.

This realignment also centralizes our engineering and operations capabilities
in a single business segment and should ensure that innovation and best
practices are shared and implemented across our many operations and will also
allow for better identification of priorities and more effective allocation
of resources to these projects.  Consistent with this approach, Development
Engineering will have dual reporting to both EEOS and the business units
which they support.

With an extensive and varied portfolio of assets around the world and a wide
variety of new development opportunities available to Enron, it is critical
that we continue to maintain the best in class capability to design,
construct, commission, and effectively manage and operate Enron,s assets on a
global basis.

This new global business unit should insure that we will continue to enhance
these demonstrated capabilities and provide us with a sustainable advantage
as we advance our business strategy around the world.

Please join us in congratulating Brian and Keith on their new assignments.

Mark Frevert & Dave Delainey


This is an issue we need to stay on top of.  Felicia: could you please put
some background together for everyone on the list?
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 03/09/2001 01:00 PM -----

	Felecia Acevedo
	03/08/2001 10:27 AM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Comparable Worth Legislation

Steve,

Do you think your Gov't Affairs group could do some investigation for us on
what the states are doing concerning strengthening the current equal pay
laws?  Also, the Paycheck Fairness Act (S.77) was introduced in the U.S.
Senate on January 22, 2001 and referred to the Committee on Health,
Education, Labor, and Pensions.  (Sponsors Mr. Daschle, Ms. Mikulski, Mr.
Kennedy, Mr. Harkin, Mr. Wellstone, Ms. Landrieu, Mrs. Lincoln, Mr. Akaka,
Mr. Breaux, Mr. Cleland, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Inouye, Mr. Kerry, Mr. Leahy, Mr.
Reid, Mr. Sarbanes, Mr. Schumer, and Mr. Johnson.  Added after the bill was
introduced.....Mr. Torricelli, Mrs. Murray, Mrs. Boxer, Mr. Dodd, Mrs.
Clinton, Mr. Feingold).  It appears that this proposed act has some reporting
requirements that could be very burdensome for us--it would probably make us
have to re-think how we have our compensation system structured.  Could
someone in your group get a feel for what is happening with this in
Washington and what kind of support it is getting?

Thanks!

The below was published in SHRM,s HRVoice - MARCH  2001 INSIDER

Campaign To Enact Comparable Worth Legislation Launched In 12 States;
Numerous Others Introducing Legislation

On February 7, a number of state legislators, labor organizations, and policy
advocates launched a campaign to promote state legislation that would
strengthen current equal pay laws and encourage comparable worth pay systems.
   Although 12 states have been explicitly identified as targets for the
passage of such  legislation, a number of other states have already
introduced bills to further address wage discrimination.

Proponents of the campaign maintain that current national and state laws that
mandate equal pay for equal work do not go far enough to remedy past and
current discrimination in compensation.  Therefore, they claim government
intervention is necessary to raise women's or minorities' wages and eliminate
gender and race-based wage discrimination.

State legislators are considering varying proposals to remedy wage
disparities, including: commissioning pay equity studies, increasing
penalties for violations of current equal pay laws, or implementing mandated
job evaluation and comparison (comparable worth) pay systems to raise wages
for jobs that are traditionally dominated by women or minorities.

The following states have been identified as targets of this legislation.
For those states that have already seen legislation introduced, the bill
numbers are also included:

Alabama
Arizona (Senate Bill 1266)
Colorado (SB 41),
Connecticut
Georgia (SR 147)
Massachusetts (HB 2110)
New Mexico
Nevada
Ohio
Texas (HB 95) *House Bill 95 provides an employee who files a wage claim with
legal protection from retaliation.
 Wisconsin
 West Virginia

Other states not included in the campaign are also seeking wage
discrimination legislation:

Indiana (HB 1438)
Iowa (HB 221, HB 226)
Minnesota (HB 666, SB 638)
Missouri (HB 115)
Mississippi (HB 176, SB 2632-both died)
New York (AB 3594, SB 2190-public sector employees affected only)
Pennsylvania (HB 140)
Rhode Island (SB 171)
Wyoming (HB 239-passed Senate Feb. 29)

For more information please visit the "Equal Pay" fact sheet at
http://www.shrm.org/government/factsheets/default.asp?page=fact-0101equalpay.a
sp


Please drop by to give me an update.   Remember we need positions broken down by component (retail gen, reg gen, ancillaries, tariff, etc.) and positions by customer.   We also need P&L by component and by customer.

Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Herndon, Rogers
Sent:	Thursday, July 12, 2001 9:57 AM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.
Subject:	FW: Meeting tomorrow (Friday)

Getting things going as we discussed.  Please feel free to join us and if you can't I will stop by and review reports with you.

RH
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Busby, Todd
Sent:	Thursday, July 12, 2001 9:53 AM
To:	Richter, Jeff; Herndon, Rogers; Aucoin, Berney C.; Dayao, Anthony; Mills, Scott
Subject:	Meeting tomorrow (Friday)

I would like for you guys to tell me what reports, etc., you will need from the NEW system to effectively manage your risks (what you need to be happy every morning).  We don't have to be all inclusive at this point, but it will help us to begin designing a systems framework to meet your requirements.  Don't hold back - feel free to dream.  Our IT department will tell us what can and can't be done.

There will be a meeting tomorrow (Friday) from 10:30 to noon in room 888 (Janet's old office) to discuss.  Let me know if you can't go.

Also, if I missed anyone who should be there, feel free to invite them.

Thanks
Todd
X36880


<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">

<TITLE>Schwab 1000 Fund</TITLE>

<META content="Microsoft FrontPage 4.0" name=GENERATOR>
 <MAP name=Map><AREA shape=RECT
  coords='474, 22, 578, 46' href="http://schwab.ed10.net/ud/K3E1/WG8R/I9Q6/50/UUL2JZ"></MAP>

One alternative is the  Schwab 1000 Fund®.  It’s designed to help investors track the total return of the Schwab 1000 Index®.  The index includes 1,000 large- and mid-cap stocks and will typically represent between 85% and 90% of the total value of all U.S. stocks.

Not only does the Schwab 1000 Fund provide investors with broad exposure to companies in many different industries and of many different sizes, but part of its stated strategy is to consider the tax consequences of its investment decisions in an effort to help reduce the tax burden on its shareholders. It’s a strategy that seems to have paid off.

Since its inception in April of 1991, the Schwab
      1000 Fund
has yet to pay a capital gain distribution. This
      doesn’t
guarantee that it will never do so, but it does help
      illustrate
the effectiveness of its tax-smart
      strategy.

Get started today.
You can invest in the Schwab 1000 Fund for a minimum of $2,500 ($1,000 for retirement and custodial accounts). Or you can increase your investment to qualify for Select Shares,® a separate class of shares offering lower expenses for a minimum initial investment of $50,000.   As with all SchwabFunds, there are no loads or purchase fees.*

You can view, download and print the
       prospectus
      online, or call us at  800.435.4000 and one of our representatives will be glad to help you. Please read the prospectus carefully before you invest or send money. It contains more complete information on management fees, risks and expenses.

The Schwab 1000 Index® includes common stocks of the 1,000 largest publicly traded companies as measured by market capitalization. It does not include privately held companies, investment companies or companies incorporated outside the United States. Unlike fund returns, indices do not reflect any fee or expense deductions and cannot be invested in directly.

* Investor shares, with operating expenses of 0.46%, require a $2,500 minimum initial investment. Select Shares, with operating expenses of 0.35%, require a minimum initial investment of $50,000. The fund charges a redemption fee of 0.75% for shares sold within 180 days of purchase. The expense ratio reflects a voluntary reduction by Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc. (CSIM) and Schwab, which is guaranteed through at least February 28, 2002.

If you would prefer to receive only service emails, please reply to this email indicating your preference. Please note: doing so will not remove you from any SchwabAlerts(r) or email newsletter to which you have actively subscribed.

      We respect your privacy. Schwab will use the information you provide to send you email alerts, communicate with you and provide information about products and services. Read about Schwab's
       privacy policy.

      Access to the Electronic Services and your account may be limited or unavailable during periods of peak demand, market volatility, systems upgrades or maintenance or other reasons.

      Notice: All email sent to or from the Charles Schwab corporate email system may be retained, monitored and/or reviewed by Schwab personnel.

      (c)2001 Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. All rights reserved. Member SIPC/NYSE. (1201-14977)

      [[YVHZ-KJS0-UUL2JZ-H]]


Below is the opinion from Rajah & Tann on the arrest of the vessel.

In summary:

1. We need to ascertain if the vessel was under a head timecharterparty as
that would determine the proper party to an action (ie, owners or time
charterers) and the proper vessel to arrest (ie. owner's vessel or time
charterer's vessel).

I have instructed Rajah & Tann to do the necessary searches and
investigations. Russell is also asking the broker for any information which
may be helpful.

I have also instructed Rajah & Tann to put the vessel and any other vessel
ECTS may potentially arrest on shipwatch. The cost of shipwatch is SGD50 to
SGD60 per month per vessel.

2. To arrest the vessel, a writ in rem, a warrant of arrest and a supporting
affidavit of the the facts will have to be prepared.  The writ and warrant
can be obtained within one working day (or over the weekend if necessary and
if the duty registrar is contactable).

We would need to quantify the claim. John, Russell and Sheila  - please let
me have an exact breakdown of the loss incurred.

3. There is practically no possibility of wrongful arrest in this case. Third
party cargo pwners also would not have an action against ECTS as the
arresting party.

4. Security can be posted by the vessel owners to secure the vessel's release.

5. Legal fees for arrest would be in the region of SGD10,000. Disbursements
payable to the Sheriff of the High Court would be between SGD4000 to SGD
SGD7000 (assuming release of the vessel with a week). Other search fees and
shipwatch fees may amount to about SGD2000.

Regards

Matt

---------------------- Forwarded by Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT on 10/07/99 11:38 AM
---------------------------

kian.sing.toh@sg.rajahtann.com on 10/06/99 08:18:39 PM
To: Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT
cc: Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT

Subject: pacific valour

Dear Matthias,

Attached please find opinion.  I have discussed with Steven Chong the issues
of
third party claims and merits of Enron's claim.  He agrees with me.

I sent two copies of this advice to your office by fax, as requested.  Please
ignore the first copy as it contains some inadvertent typo errors.

(See attached file: Enron-1 (revision).doc)

*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.  If you
are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery
of
the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to
anyone.
In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by
reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer does not
consent
to Internet email for messages of this kind.  Opinions, conclusions and other
information in this message that do not relate to the official business of my
firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.

 - Enron-1 (revision).doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/03/2000
10:49 AM ---------------------------

Jlpnymex@aol.com on 04/03/2000 09:28:04 AM
To: Doris.A.Abernathy@ucm.com, nalexander@texasmonthly.emmis.com,
blackj@wellsfargo.com, Louisb2468@aol.com, burgher@cornerstonesolutions.com,
rclark@nymex.com, ckcrews@swbell.net, KCDunnagan@aol.com,
rdyerlaw@houston.rr.com, sgoldfield@tmh.tmc.edu,
lesley.guthrie@cpa.state.tx.us, elizabethherring@pzlqs.com,
khcnb@arkansas.net, robyn_howard@aimfunds.com, Michael.Jacobs@hq.doe.gov,
vkamins@enron.com, paulcraiglaird2@netscape.net,
adrian.a.nunez@usa.conoco.com, daricha@ppco.com, esjerve@canspec.com,
alane_smith@transcanada.com, james.stanton@et.pge.com,
dzerba@teldatasolutions.com
cc:
Subject: Fwd: FW: Martha Stewart's Tips for Rednecks

Have a good week!

Jana

Return-Path: <woodybc@bp.com>
Received: from  rly-zb01.mx.aol.com (rly-zb01.mail.aol.com [172.31.41.1]) by
air-zb05.mail.aol.com (v70.20) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 11:18:19 -0500
Received: from  interlock.amoco.com (interlock.amoco.com [192.195.167.2]) by
rly-zb01.mx.aol.com (v70.21) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 11:17:55 -0500
Received: by interlock.amoco.com id KAA20262  (InterLock SMTP Gateway 3.0 for
jlpnymex@aol.com);  Fri, 31 Mar 2000 10:17:46 -0600
Received: by interlock.amoco.com (Protected-side Proxy Mail Agent-2);  Fri,
31 Mar 2000 10:17:46 -0600
Received: by interlock.amoco.com (Protected-side Proxy Mail Agent-1);  Fri,
31 Mar 2000 10:17:46 -0600
Message-Id: <D53215B582D2D2118F580008C7B1AB47C33B16@amhoux9.hou.am.bp.com>
From: "Woody, Brett C" <woodybc@bp.com>
To: "'dand@headington.com'" <dand@headington.com>,
"'clwhite@duke-energy.com'" <clwhite@duke-energy.com>,
"'joyg@aurora-gas.com'" <joyg@aurora-gas.com>,        "'jlpnymex@aol.com'"
<jlpnymex@aol.com>
Subject: FW: Martha Stewart's Tips for Rednecks
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 10:16:40 -0600
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0)

A little light humor.

> > Subject:  Martha Stewart's Tips for Rednecks
> >
> > MARTHA STEWART'S TIPS FOR REDNECKS
> >
> > 1. Never take a beer to a job interview.
> > 2. Always identify people in your yard before shooting squirrels.
> > 3. It's considered tacky to take a cooler to church.
> > 4. If you have to vacuum the bed, it is time to change the sheets.
> > 5. Even if you're certain that you are included in the will, it is
> > still considered improper to drive a U-Haul to the funeral home.
> >
> > DINING OUT
> > 1. When decanting wine, make sure that you tilt the paper cup, and pour
> > slowly so as not to "bruise" the fruit of the vine.
> > 2. If drinking directly from the bottle, always hold it with your
> > fingers covering the label.
> >
> > ENTERTAINING IN YOUR HOME
> > 1. A centerpiece for the table should never be anything prepared by a
> > taxidermist.
> > 2. Do not allow the dog to eat at the table...no matter how good his
> > manners are.
> >
> > PERSONAL HYGIENE
> > 1. While ears need to be cleaned regularly, this is a job that should
> > be done in private using one's OWN truck keys.
> > 2. Proper use of toiletries can forestall bathing for several days.
> > However, if you live alone, deodorant is not a waste of good money.
> > 3. Dirt and grease under the fingernails is a social no-no, as they
> > tend to detract from a woman's jewelry and alter the taste of finger
> > foods.
> >
> > DATING (Outside the Family)
> > 1. Always offer to bait your date's hook, especially on the first date.
> > 2. Be aggressive. Let her know you're interested:  "I've been wanting
> > to go out with you since I read that stuff on the bathroom wall two
> years
> > ago."
> > 3. Establish with her parents what time she is expected back. Some will
> > say 10:00 PM; Others might say "Monday." If the latter is the answer, it
> > is the man's responsibility to get her to school on time.
> >
> > THEATER ETIQUETTE
> > 1. Crying babies should be taken to the lobby and picked up immediately
> > after the movie has ended.
> > 2. Refrain from talking to characters on the screen. Tests have proven
> > they can't hear you.
> >
> > WEDDINGS
> > 1. Livestock, usually, is a poor choice for a wedding gift.
> > 2. Kissing the bride for more than 5 seconds may get you shot.
> > 3. For the groom, at least, rent a tux. A leisure suit with a
> > cummerbund and a clean bowling shirt can create an unappealing
> appearance.
> > 4. Though uncomfortable, say "yes" to socks and shoes for this special
> > occasion.
> >
> > DRIVING ETIQUETTE
> > 1. Dim your headlights for approaching vehicles; Even if the gun is
> > loaded, and the deer is in sight.
> > 2. When approaching a four-way stop, the vehicle with the largest tires
> > always has the right of way.
> > 3. Never tow another car using panty hose and duct tape.
> > 4. When sending your wife down the road with a gas can, it is impolite
> > to ask her to bring back beer.
> > 5. Do not lay rubber while traveling in a funeral procession.
> > 6. Do not mend mufflers with bubble-gum if your truck back-fires
> >
>
>


FYI....I received the encroachment permit yesterday and have requested the
insurance certificate accordingly.  There are alot of requirements in this
item and may take us getting waivers or ammendments from the carrier.   I
will keep you informed on the timing.  This will probably not be a quick
turn around like a vanilla certificate.

                    Kenny Maltby
                                         To:     Larry.Campbell@enron.com
                    03/09/01 12:48       cc:     Bob
Jacobs/Long_Beach/Eott@Eott, Edward
                    PM                   Attanasio/Remote/Eott@Eott,
john.shafer@enron.com,
                                         louis.soldano@enron.com, Matt
Hughes@ENRON, Molly
                                         Sample/Houston/Eott@Eott,
Rich.Jolly@enron.com, Scott
                                         Jones/Bakersfield/Eott@Eott, Susan
Ralph/Houston/Eott@Eott,
                                         William.Kendrick@enron.com
                                         Subject:     Re: Rogas
Pipelines(Document link: Susan Ralph)

That's great Larry. I understand that we can not do anything in the by-pass
channel and this will be made clear in the environmental orientation
Monday. If we don't get compensation credits, insurance certificates and
written approval from the Fish and Game for trapping we can not proceed any
father than the carrot field. Once we get the approvals the plan is to
clear right of way and string pipe week ahead. The by-pass channel is a
month into the project.

                    Larry.Campbell
                    @enron.com            To:     Kenny
Maltby/Bakersfield/Eott@Eott, Matt Hughes@ENRON, Bob
                                          Jacobs/Long_Beach/Eott@Eott, Edward
Attanasio/Remote/Eott@Eott, Susan
                    03/09/2001            Ralph/Houston/Eott@Eott, Molly
Sample/Houston/Eott@Eott,
                    10:13 AM              john.shafer@enron.com,
louis.soldano@enron.com, Scott
                                          Jones/Bakersfield/Eott@Eott,
William.Kendrick@enron.com,
                                          Rich.Jolly@enron.com
                                          cc:
                                          Subject:     Re: Rogas Pipelines

Kenny, I have contacted the agencies for which permits and approvals were
requested and have been given the green light to initiate the Rogas
project.  Please understand that IN NO WAY can we initiate activities
associated with the bypass channel construction until approval is given by
each agency contacted.  I will apprise you as the approvals are received or
if further information is requested by each agency.  Enjoy digging in the
carrot field.
---------------------- Forwarded by Larry Campbell/ET&S/Enron on 03/09/2001
11:09 AM ---------------------------

Larry.Campbell@enron.com on 03/08/2001 03:16:33 PM

To:   Kenny_Maltby@eott.com, Matt_Hughes%ENRON@EOTT.COM,
      Bob_Jacobs@eott.com, edward.attanasio@eott.com, susan.Ralph@eott.com,
      Molly.Sample@eott.com, larry.campbell@enron.com,
      rich.jolly@enron.com, john.shafer@enron.com, louis.soldana@enron.com,
      Scott_Jones@eott.com
cc:

Subject:  Re: Rogas Pipelines

Kenny, as you may know, there were 9 environmental applications submitted
to various local, state, and regional agencies requesting approval to
initiate this project and most of the requests apply to crossing the bypass
channel.   As of today, we have received one approval, and that from the
State Fire Marshall, Office of Pipeline Safety granting us a waiver so that
we can lay the pipe above ground as opposed to below ground.  I have calls
into  the other agencies  for which applications and requests were
submitted but have had no reply.  I would caution that we might get into
trouble for initiating a construction project without consent and approval
from a particular agency, as agencies many times look at an entire project
even though their jurisdiction may only apply in one specific area of a
project.  This is particularily the case in air permitting where an
applicant can not even construct a road or bring in construction materials
until the air permit is issued.  Because this is my first project in
California, Id like to be sure of this and make follow up calls to all
agencies for which applications and requests were submitted and verify that
we can initiate the construction, as long as we dont impact a specific  or
strategic portion (ie  the bypass channel)  for sometime down the road when
we are well into the project.   Ill call you tomorrow and let you
know.......

Kenny_Maltby@eott.com on 03/08/2001 02:13:39 PM

To:   Matt_Hughes%ENRON@EOTT.COM, Bob_Jacobs@eott.com,
      edward.attanasio@eott.com, susan.Ralph@eott.com,
      Molly.Sample@eott.com, larry.campbell@enron.com,
      rich.jolly@enron.com, john.shafer@enron.com, louis.soldana@enron.com,
      Scott_Jones@eott.com
cc:

Subject:  Rogas Pipelines

We are going to start the Rogas project Monday 03/12/2001. The first 2500
ft leaving Rogas is across a carrot field that has been harvested and is
not in any habitat. The farmer is due to start working the field the 24th
so we need to get the pipe laid. The contractor is going to start with a
reduced crew and expects to be finished crossing the initial 2500 ft by the
end of the week. The following things must be accomplished early next week
so we can continue construction.

Checks received so we can purchase compensation credits from Kern Water
Bank and Area.

Be added to the KWB's Master Permit. That will happen when they receive
there check.

Insurance certificates in the hands of the Kern County Water Agency and
West Kern Water.

If the contractor has to stop we may be faced with additional mobilization
and demobilization charges.


Janet,

.16 decatherms allocated at this meter for 5/31/2000.  Can you please extend
deal (one more time for me) for 5/31/2000.

Thanks again for your help.

-Jackie-
3-9497
---------------------- Forwarded by Jackie Young/HOU/ECT on 06/05/2000 11:28
AM ---------------------------

Daren J Farmer
06/02/2000 11:00 AM
To: Janet H Wallis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jackie Young/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: 98-1601

Done

To: dfarmer@enron.com
cc: pam.leigh@southernunionco.com
Subject: 98-1601

Please extend the sale at Lockhart  to Southern Union for two extra days at
the same price.

Thank you,
Janet
---------------------- Forwarded by Janet H Wallis/HOU/ECT on 06/02/2000
10:16 AM ---------------------------

Jackie Young
06/02/2000 09:32 AM
To: Janet H Wallis/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: 98-1601

Can you please extend deal #254839 to cover flow for 5/20 and 5/21?  On the
20th, 578 decatherms flowed.  On the 21st, 109 decatherms flowed.

Thanks
-Jackie-
3-9497


This is a great, easy to use site.  Even if you're a member of another networking community, it's always a good idea to sign up for more.

Good Luck.

Tom Wilbeck
Organizational Development and Learning
713.345.7536

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Prihoda, Melissa
Sent:	Monday, December 03, 2001 8:54 AM
To:	Wilbeck, Tom
Subject:	FW: Networking Community

Hey guys- here is a networking community a group of us put together.  Feel free to share it.  The doc attached is how you register for the distribution list.
-Melissa

X-ENE's Networking community of current or former employees who are looking for employment or have information regarding employment opportunities.
Please share the following information in your first message to the community [name, personal email address, home phone number-optional]


Everyone,

As we stated earlier, this particular virus that is on the internet is causing a lot of issues for Corporations.  As a result, the companies who write anti-virus software are continuously updating their software.  As of this morning, another update has been made available to us.  This update does a better job of protecting your PC than the update we received last night.

At this time, it is extremely important that you again go through one of the procedures listed below to get the latest update.

1.  Logout of the network and log back in or

2.  Click on START>PROGRAMS>ACCESSORIES>Norton AntiVirus Corporate Edition and then click the Live Update button.  This will pop up a screen where you will have to click the "Next" button and then a "Finish" button.  - If you are an EES user, this option is not available to you.  Please use option 1.

The proper version of the update pattern you need is:   (9/18/2001, version 30918BL) - You may need to restart the Norton Anti-Virus client if you want to visually insure that you have the latest update.

If you have questions or concerns, please direct them to your Resolution Center.

Enron Global Technology


I want you to lunch with Nony and I tomorrow?

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


DEFS Finishes 2000 With Multiple Transactions

Duke Energy Field Services (DEFS) finished off 2000 with a bang by completing
three year-end asset transactions. First, the company finalized the $91
million sale of natural gas liquid (NGL) pipeline assets to TEPPCO Crude
Pipeline, L.P., then it completed the purchase of certain natural gas
pipeline assets from El Paso Field Services in two separate deals for an
undisclosed sum.

The assets sold to TEPPCO include the Panola Pipeline and the San Jacinto
Pipeline, both of which are NGL pipelines. Under the agreement, TEPPCO also
agreed to take over the lease of a 34-mile condensate pipeline. The three
pipelines included in the sale all originate at DEFS' East Texas Plant
Complex located in Panola County, TX.

"This sale underscores our strategy of growing earnings through our TEPPCO
master limited partnership," said Jim Mogg, CEO of DEFS. "In 2000, we almost
doubled the distribution that DEFS received as the general partner of TEPPCO
Partners, L.P., and at the same time increased the distribution to limited
partnership unitholders."

In the second transaction, which the company completed on Dec. 28, 2000, DEFS
acquired 100% of Gas Transmission Teco, Inc.'s common stock. The company owns
interests in the 500-mile Teco intrastate natural gas pipeline in Texas, and
was purchased from El Paso Field Services.

Included in the assets, DEFS gained a 50% interest in the El Paso-operated
West Texas Line which travels from Waha to New Braunfels, a 100% interest in
the Guadalupe Line that travels from New Braunfels to Dewville, and a 50%
interest in the MidTex Line from Dewville to Katy. DEFS also received several
supply lines and related assets with the acquisition.

DEFS said the lines combined have a 250 MMcf/d of natural gas capacity, and
extend from Waha in West Texas to Katy. The company also noted that the lines
interconnect five DEFS plants with a combined processing capacity of 640
MMcf/d.

"The timely addition of this strategic system provides DEFS with increased
marketing opportunities for the gas from these plants," said Mogg. "The lines
also allow DEFS new access to the growing San Antonio/Austin corridor."

In DEFS' third end of the year transaction, the company acquired El Paso
Field Services' 50% interest in the 265-mile San Jacinto natural gas
pipeline. The transaction brings DEFS' ownership up to 100%. The San Jacinto
line provides gas gathering and transportation services along the Texas Gulf
Coast, with delivery to a third party and two DEFS gas processing plants.

DEFS was formed last year when Duke Energy and Phillips Petroleum combined
their natural gas gathering and processing businesses. Duke Energy holds a
70% stake in the company while Phillips retains a 30% share.


Please approve Mike Grigsby for Bloomberg.

Thank You,
Phillip Allen


Hi Daren,

As per our phone conversation I sent you a fax, but I also wanted to let you
have an electronic copy of the failed deals which need to be booked into
SITARA. Attached is the detail on the six trades in question. Thanks!

Torrey Moorer (x36218)


I'm just sending the sheets that are saved in our system. Bill Williams told
me he cleared everything up on the Real Time side yesterday, but if the
volumes in these documents still look wrong, please let me know.

Thanks,
Kate Symes
Trading Support
503-464-7486


Here's one for you to chew on for awhile.  As we approach the transition to a
new organizational structure in ET&S, let's rethink the role and competencies
of the legal department.  I'd like each of you to answer the following
questions and circulate your answers to me and each other.  To avoid having
anyone's answers unduly influenced by anyone else's, please send your
responses at 12 noon on Thursday.  No, this isn't being graded, and doesn't
affect the PRC process or any other process.  I just want to get access to as
much original thinking as possible.

1.  What is the ET&S law dept. currently best at?  (give one example).

2.  What is the ET&S law dept. currently worst at?  (give one example).

3.  Without regard for any past objectives, what should our top 3 objectives
be?  (make these very specific--objectives like "We should manage legal and
regulatory compliance and optimize shareholder value"  don't cut it).

Thanks for your responses.  DF


Teco Tap       25.000 / Enron ;  48.750 / HPL IFERC

LS HPL LSK IC       15.000 / Enron


<<TLR-latest.ppt>>

__________________________
Narasimha D. Rao
Senior Analyst
Tabors Caramanis & Associates
(617) 868-6719

 - TLR-latest.ppt


Today was a very difficult day for us as market uncertainty continued.  Recent news reports, including The Wall Street Journal article today, have speculated about possible mergers, takeovers and equity investors as options that Enron is considering.  The reason you have not seen us responding to these reports is that it is our corporate policy not to comment on market speculation.  However, I will tell you that we are evaluating all options to protect the financial stability of this company.  I will keep you updated on developments as they occur.


Yes that does sound a lot like your structure....I fill address from here... BT

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Fuller, Dave
Sent:	Friday, October 05, 2001 4:14 PM
To:	Tycholiz, Barry
Cc:	Whitt, Mark
Subject:	EES

One of the guys here recieved a call from a guy at EES looking for contacts at gas utilities in the Northwest.  They are hoping to sell them some sort of deal where they provide the utility structured products and the utility pushes them through to the endusers... isn't that my Cascade deal?  Let's discuss Monday, it sounds like something we need to nip in the bud.


Colton and I will be there some time during the day on Saturday and will
spend the night.

David_M_Benninger@reliantenergy.com on 02/09/2001 10:45:02 AM
To: "Butch Butcher" <butch@watsonmoving.com>
cc: <efalldr@aol.com>, <rkgbh@aol.com>, <stehrfamily@aol.com>,
<jbyrd@byrdinterior.com>, <sneal@enron.com>, <letenhave@freewwweb.com>,
<troy_utz@ml.com>, <rhancock@nmhn-law.com>, <joe_a_hays@oxy.com>,
<Jimmy.Daggett@ST-Systems.com>, <paul.stehr@stdreg.com>, <marks@stes.com>,
<Delozier.S-Don@usa.conoco.com>, "Butch Butcher" <Butch@watsonmoving.com>
Subject: Indian Guides Campout Feb. 16-18, 2001

Brother Butcher and I are still in need of a final list of who's in and
who's out for next weekend's Indian Guides camp-out at Brazos Bend state
park.  Given the proximity of the park to our neighborhood (less than 1 hr
away), most everyone (like me!) will be coming and going to meet other
commitments back at home - SO THAT'S NO EXCUSE !!!

To refresh your memories,  the itinerary for the weekend is get to the park
Friday after school and set up before dark.  (For those who need to go down
there later (Sat morning or afternoon) the location of our campsite will be
at the entrance to the park.)  Once we get there, the activities are
bicycle riding, touch football, fishing (bring your own gear) and boys
playing grab-ass in general.  THE ONLY SCHEDULED EVENTS ARE A DINNER
SATURDAY NIGHT,  A TRIP TO THE PARK'S OBSERVATORY SATURDAY NIGHT  AND
BREAKFAST SUNDAY AM.  For food purposes, we need to know an accurate
headcount for Saturday night and Sunday morning. If you need help getting
your bikes to the park, get with Butch, he's looking into getting a trailer
(or something).  We can settle-up on food, campsite rentals, lottery
tickets, ... when we get there.  Maps for those who need them will be
provided next week.

Oh yes, this is real camping, as in tents, sleeping bags,
flashlights,lanterns, etc.  Please feel free to bring snacks and drinks.
Of course, this is all subject to weather cooperating.  We'll make the
final call on that by Thursday.

To date, below is the headcount:

          Friday Night   Saturday Night

Fallick        ?         ?
Stehr          ?         Yes
Byrd      ?         Yes
Neal      ?         ?
Ten Have  ?         ?
Utz       No        No
Hancock   No        No
Hays      ?         ?
Daggett   ?         ?
Suchman   ?         ?
Delozier  ?         ?
Butcher        Yes       Yes
Benninger Yes       Yes

Please RSVP to me or Butch ASAP by e-mail or phone (Benninger: 713/207-1329
(w) or 713/984-1572 (h);  Butcher: 281/541-1878 (cell) or 281/497-6612 (h).

Yah-te-hay!

DB


Very interesting websites.  Thanks for keeping me updated!  -Scott
---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Tholan/Corp/Enron on 06/29/2000
05:38 PM ---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski@ECT
06/29/2000 10:37 AM
To: Scott Tholan/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Control

FYI

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 06/29/2000
10:41 AM ---------------------------

VKaminski@aol.com on 06/28/2000 11:11:37 PM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Control

 STO
A: Political control technologies - Summary of Interim Study


Class Action Lawsuits Alleging Restraint of Trade and Unfair Business
Practices Filed Against SoCal Gas, San Diego Gas & Electric, And El Paso
Natural Gas

LOS ANGELES, Dec. 18 /PRNewswire/  via NewsEdge Corporation  -
Two related class action lawsuits
have been filed in the California Superior Court in Los Angeles, against
Southern California Gas Company, San Diego Gas & Electric Company, Sempra
Energy (parent of the two utilities), El Paso Natural Gas Co., and other
companies related to El Paso Natural Gas.

The two lawsuits allege a conspiracy resulting in restraint of trade and
unfair competition and unlawful business practices.  The complaints summarize
the issue as follows:

This action involves a massive conspiracy to eliminate competition in the
newly deregulated energy industry that has resulted in endangering
California's electrical system and threatening California's economy.  It
is perhaps the largest gouging of energy consumers in American history.
Southern California's current "energy crisis" is not simply the result of
ever-increasing demand by a growing population for energy.  Rather, it is
the direct result of a conspiracy among the natural gas industry's most
powerful Southern California players to preserve and maintain the market
dominance that they enjoyed for many years as monopolies subject to
regulation.  When the artificial monopoly created by regulation was
disassembled, those dominant companies took prompt and illegal action to
ensure that they would not lose the benefits of their market power.  Their
unlawful collusion has contributed significantly to the recent
astronomical increases in the price of natural gas and electricity.  As a
result, Southern California customers have had to pay billions of dollars
extra for their natural gas and electric needs.  This lawsuit seeks to
recover those damages. (Para. 1 and 2 of complaint.)

"In September of 1996, top executives of Southern California Gas Company
("SoCal Gas"), San Diego Gas & Electric ("SDG&E") and El Paso Natural
Gas
Corporation ("EPNG") met at the Embassy Suites Hotel, near Sky Harbor
Airport in Phoenix, Arizona.  Fearing a new era of open competition and
lower prices, these latter day captains of industry gathered secretly to
hatch a conspiracy to dominate the unregulated aspects of the natural gas
and electricity markets.  At the meeting, these three companies, who
together dominate the Southern California natural gas market, illegally
agreed not to compete against each other in the Southern California and
Baja California natural gas delivery markets.  They also conspired to
prevent other pipelines from being built that would have competed against
them and lowered natural gas prices in these markets.  The conspirators
sought to eliminate competition, take advantage of electric deregulation,
drive up the price of natural gas, and profit from the increased prices."
(Para 4 of complaint.)

One of the two lawsuits addresses the effects of the conspiracy on natural
gas prices; the other deals with the effects on electricity prices.
(The price of gas-fired generation establishes the price for most of the
electricity used in Southern California.)

Copies of the two lawsuits filed this morning are available as Adobe
Acrobat (PDF) files on the web site of the law firm of O'Donnell and Shaeffer
at http://oslaw.com/osnews.

Attorneys representing the plaintiffs are available for interviews, and
can also provide additional materials, including copies of the agenda prepared
for the secret meeting, as well as graphics illustrating the location of
natural gas pipelines that were planned, but then terminated by the defendants
following the secret meeting in Phoenix.

For more information contact:  Pierce O'Donnell or Carole E. Handler,
O'Donnell & Shaeffer LLP, (213) 532-2000

SOURCE  O'Donnell & Shaeffer LLP

CONTACT:  Pierce O'Donnell or Carole E. Handler of O'Donnell & Shaeffer
LLP, 213-532-2000
Web site:  http://oslaw.com/osnews

E SOURCE Study:  Customer-Side Electricity Demand Reduction Could Stem Rising
Power Prices

BOULDER, Colo., Dec. 18 /PRNewswire/  via NewsEdge Corporation  -
With electricity prices rising
like floodwaters in California and other states, limited generation capacity
has garnered the most attention as the culprit.  Many see constructing new
power plants as the sole solution for bringing prices down.  However, E SOURCE
research just out of the field indicates that convincing customers to reduce
their electricity demand in exchange for cash could provide tremendous price
relief in open power markets.  "Our study shows that commercial and industrial
customers are very willing to reduce demand if the price is right, if
mechanisms are in place for communicating those prices, and if they have a
means of controlling their electric loads.  We found that larger customers
could offer almost 20 percent of their load as negawatts -- temporary
reductions in electricity demand," says E SOURCE Vice President Bill LeBlanc.

Because most electricity use is considered essential and rising wholesale
prices don't immediately affect end users, prices can go sky high when power
supplies get tight.  But if demand dropped in response to high prices, LeBlanc
contends that overall power costs would be much lower.  He explains, "Although
there's a disconnect between price and demand in the marketplace today, we've
uncovered a significant subset of customers who seem ready to participate in a
dynamic pricing market.  Unfortunately, most of them don't yet have the
communication and control tools that would make load management possible.
They also haven't been offered a pricing product they like."  The E SOURCE
research study confirms that customers want flexibility in deciding whether to
participate in load reductions on a daily or even hourly basis, as just one
example.

So how many negawatts are available?  According to the E SOURCE national
market survey, medium-to-large commercial and industrial customers could
potentially reduce their demand by 18 percent if offered a market price of $1
per kWh (one of the tested price points) for reduced electricity usage.  At
this price -- which, incidentally, is what Edison International CEO and
President John Bryson reported that his company paid for electricity on
December 12 in wholesale power markets -- about 55,000 MW could be made
available across the U.S., and about 4,800 MW in California.  LeBlanc adds,
"We can't expect to capture all of this potential.  But with the right
product, pricing scheme, and marketing, it would be possible to help relieve
price pressure on the whole system."  The E SOURCE study, "Energy Pricing and
Load Management:  What Do End-Users Want?" can help energy service providers
design appropriate products and identify the customer groups most likely to
participate in such programs.  It's based on an extensive research with over
700 energy decision-makers across the U.S. and Canada.

For further information about "Energy Pricing and Load Management," please
call Bill LeBlanc at 720-548-5476 or Tia Hensler, market research director, at
720-548-5614.

SOURCE  E SOURCE

CONTACT:  Bill LeBlanc, 720-548-5476, or Tia Hensler, market research
director, 720-548-5614, both for E SOURCE
Web site:  http://www.esource.com


Anshuman,

Thanks for your message. I look forward to meeting you in January.

Vince

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Axe Ass" <anshu1975@hotmail.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, December 24, 2001 7:51 PM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J
Subject:	Hello

Hi Vince,

Hope my mail reaches you. I am really sorry that the Enron saga is coming to such an end. I have closely followed developments through the press. Personally, I continue to be proud to be associated with the company and more specifically with the Dabhol Project. I have learned a lot in my three years at Enron and hope to continue to learn from the experiences of its people.

I saw you at Rice a few weeks back, but you were very busy and was hence unable to talk with you. I am leaving for India tomorrow and will return only in the second week of January. Its probably obvious, but the enron debacle has affected my future career options and also does severely constrain me in more ways than one. Hope the lunch offer still stands open, will take you up on it in January.

I hope the holidays prove to be a time of relaxation for you and your family. Wish you a merry christmas and Best wishes for the new year to you and your family.

Regards,
Anshuman

Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: Click Here << File: 'http://go.msn.com/bql/hmtag2_etl_EN.asp' >>


OK

Remi

From:	John J Lavorato/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/23/2001 10:58 AM CDT
To:	Remi Collonges/SA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject:	RE: ENA trades

Just use mids on the day they were pulled.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Collonges, Remi
Sent:	Wednesday, May 23, 2001 10:47 AM
To:	Lavorato, John
Cc:	Joe Kishkill/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT; Orlando Gonzalez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject:	ENA trades

John,

As per our conversation yesterday, I suggest that we put the two trades that you closed with us in January (25 MW baseload swap, 1 year, Feb. 01 to Jan 02) back on the MTM books and give you simultaneously the opportunity to close these positions.  Our prices for  June 01 - Jan 02 swap rates are as follows:

Argentina power $18.50 - $20.40 per MWh (this is a bid-offer spread in US dollars; you are currently long)
Brazil power R$425 - R$475 per MWh (this is a bid-offer spread in reais; you are currently short);

We are also making sure that there will be no adverse tax impact for Enron.

Please let me know if you agree to close these positions.

Remi


A reminder:  900am Monday, my office.  3882

We need the spread sheet on the transformer payments, please.

Thanks,

Kay