Please print the attachment. Thank you.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mathews, Leena
Sent:	Thursday, May 24, 2001 6:11 AM
To:	Torres, Juan; Sturmer, Donald C. (BEn); Ibrahim, Amr; Zaayman, Johan; Sharma, Ban; Peter Berger@ECT; Howes, Carol; Laad, Milind; Neslage, John; Maisashvili, Gia; Brownfeld, Gail; Ann M Schmidt@ENRON; Culwell, Catherine; Dutt, Ranabir; Wesner-Soong, Sarah; Ben Glisan@ECT; Castelino, George; Larry Morse@enron.com; diana.chow@linklaters.com; Laura_Ewald@enron.net; Rios, Amy; Walls Jr., Rob; jderric@enron.com; pnagarva@ben.bechtel.com; mark_ringwelski@enron.net; Dabholsecurity,; Y'Barbo, Paul; Richard.Allison@gecapital.com
Subject:	may 24 part I newsclips


no

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Koehler, Anne C.
Sent:	Wednesday, September 05, 2001 2:51 PM
To:	Sanders, Richard B.
Subject:	Legal opinion

In connection with ENA legal opinions (to be signed by Mark H) required for two swap transaction closings later this week, please advise by return e-mail whether or not, to your knowledge, except as disclosed in Enron Corp.'s SEC reports, there is any action, suit or proceeding pending or threatened against ENA before any court or arbitrator or any governmental body agency or  official that could either (1) materially and adversely affect the business consolidated financial position or consolidated results of operations of ENA and its subsidiaries, or (2) impair ENA's ability to perform its obligations in connection with the swaps.

Thanks


looks good to me.  greg

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rapp, Bill
Sent:	Thursday, November 29, 2001 2:48 PM
To:	Watson, Kimberly; Lokay, Michelle; Lindberg, Lorraine; Lohman, TK; McConnell, Mark; Blair, Lynn
Cc:	Porter, J. Gregory; Fossum, Drew; Pryor, Tony
Subject:	OBA Letter

	Attached for your review and comments is a first draft of the letter that Kim requested to the operators that have not yet executed new OBAs.

 << File: OBALetterA.doc >>


Dear Mr. Lay,

My name is Tony Eng and I am responsible for Business Development for
NetCel360.  NetCel360 would very much like to have an opportunity to meet
with you to understand Enron's current pan-Asian e-Business strategy and
regional footprint.  I respectfully request a meeting with you to discuss
operational and transactional issues that you face in the Asia-Pac region
and solutions NetCel360 may be able to provide.

Headquartered in Asia, NetCel360 is the first pan-Asian e-Business Service
Provider (eSP) led by Founder and Chairman, Phil Kelly, previously President
of Dell Asia where he is recognized for his pivotal role in building Dell
Computer's direct business to over $1 Billion.  Our executive staff are
industry leaders and bring their experience to NetCel360 from companies such
as AT&T, Motorola, Dell Computer, Citibank, American Express, Bain, Allied
Signal and more.

The core of our model is to provide a complete platform of transactional and
business services required to support e-commerce across Asia, enabling you
to easily reach this entire market in multi-currency and multi-language
formats.  The services are offered turnkey or customized to your specific
requirements.

Consulting - Asia Pacific specific market research and Internet strategy
execution
Web Services - web hosting, design, translation/localization, integration
Full Call Center Service Support - 24 x 7 support for virtually all contact
channels in multi-language formats (i.e. web, e-mail, VoIP, fax,
inbound/outbound calls, text chat, form sharing) to provide customer
service, technical support, order fulfillment, warranty return/replace
functionality
Financial and Legal Services - tax, treasury, collections, billing,
credit-card payment support
Logistics - supply chain management, end-user delivery, export controls,
collect-and-return services/facilities, and customized on-line global
tracking system
Internet Service Provider - ISP connectivity, directory content, search
functions, email, chat, and Web connectivity.

Kenneth, I would like the opportunity to introduce you to our Director of
Business Development, Dan Delaney, and our Senior Consultant, Hao Wu, to
talk about your plans in the Asia-Pacific region.  It is quite likely that
NetCel360 can off-load many of the challenges for you, leaving your
resources available to focus on your customers, brand, and product
strategies.  In addition to the attached flash file on NetCel360, more
information about our services, management team, alliances and investors is
available at www.netcel360.com.

Thank you for your time Kenneth.  I look forward to the opportunity of
speaking with you soon.  Please feel free to call me anytime with any
questions you may have at 858/592-8882.

Best Regards,

Tony Eng

NetCel360, Inc.
Phone: 858/592-8882
E-Mail: Tony_Eng@netcel360.com
Visit us at www.netcel360.com

 <<NetCel360.exe>>

 - NetCel360.exe


Can we locate a copy of a nexisting executing agreement for ECT or ENA.  CSFB has no record of any modified agreement.  If we could locate and fax over they will use the prior execute.

Alternatively could we continue the process of marking up the agreement they emailed.

It turns out there is one other unsettled trade that they may not be able to push through if we cannot move this through quickly.

Thanks,

Tom

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Doukas, Tom
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 1:33 PM
To:	Heard, Marie
Cc:	Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	RE: trading authorization

just found it.  thanks

I leaned on CSFB by the way.  They are going to settle the trades outstanding, but will cut us off from further trades until we have an executed agreement.  They are locating the existing agreements to copy them.  Thanks for all your help and patience.

Tom

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Heard, Marie
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 1:29 PM
To:	Doukas, Tom
Subject:	RE: trading authorization

You should have received a fax from me by now.  Have you not received it?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Doukas, Tom
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 1:06 PM
To:	Heard, Marie
Subject:	RE: trading authorization

Not a problem at all.  I guess I will wait for your group to produce a list.

Thanks,

Tom

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Heard, Marie
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 12:57 PM
To:	Doukas, Tom
Subject:	RE: trading authorization

Tom:

You can only see the master agreement database.  The brokerage agreement database is separate and cannot be viewed by anyone outside Legal.  The Bear Stearns agreement you see listed is there in error.  It should be in the brokerage agreement database.  We do have listings for Morgan and Goldman.  Sara wasn't aware that you couldn't see this database when you spoke,

Marie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Doukas, Tom
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 12:15 PM
To:	Shackleton, Sara
Cc:	Heard, Marie
Subject:	RE: trading authorization

I have gone through the database and have only been able to find the Bear Prime Broker agreement under ECI.  I know I have a Morgan ECI account and should have a Goldman pending.  I am looking for Enron Co=Enron Credit Inc. is that not correct?

Please advise.

Thanks,

Tom

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shackleton, Sara
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 11:39 AM
To:	Doukas, Tom
Subject:	trading authorization

You need to send an email to Donna Lowry, Cassandra Schultz, William S. Bradford

Sara Shackleton
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3801a
Houston, TX  77002
Ph:  (713) 853-5620
Fax: (713) 646-3490


Attached is a revised Credit Watch listing as of 4/17/01.   Please note that
Nevada Power Company, Sierra Pacific Resources and Sierra Pacific Power
Company were all placed on NO TRADES and Select Energy, Inc. was placed on
Call Credit.
If there are any personnel in your group that were not included in this
distribution, please insure that they receive a copy of this report.
To add additional people to this distribution, or if this report has been
sent to you in error, please contact Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002.
For other questions, please contact Bill Bradford at x3-3831, Russell Diamond
at x5-7095, or Brant Reves at x3-9897.


In re-reading this, I noticed that Todd Hall was included in the distribution
list.  He is the only one from Brent's team included.  Do you want to copy
Brent as well, or was Todd's inclusion due to his previous responsibility
over the MPR, which now is managed by Susie Ayala.  Either way, you may want
to include Brent on the message just so that he and his team know about the
creation of this common drive.

What about Georgeanne Hodges?  Should she be notified as well?  You may also
want to copy Wes as an FYI.  Thanks.

From: Beth Apollo/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/10/2001 08:52 AM
To: Shona Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey W
White/HOU/ECT@ECT, D Todd Hall/ENRON@enronXgate, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brenda F Herod/ENRON@enronXgate,
john.j.boudreaux@us.arthurandersen.com@SMTP@enronXgate,
john.vickers@us.arthurandersen.com@SMTP@enronXgate,
kate.agnew@us.arthurandersen.com@SMTP@enronXgate,
jennifer.stevenson@us.arthurandersen.com@SMTP@enronXgate
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, tom.bauer@us.arthurandersen.com@SMTP@enronXgate,
Georgeanne Hodges/ENRON@enronXgate, Vanessa Schulte/ENRON@enronXgate, Bob M
Hall/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A
Price/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject: Confidential Folder to safely pass information to  Arthur Andersen

We have become increasingly concerned about confidential information
(dpr/position info, curves, validations/stress tests, etc) being passed to
Arthur Andersen for audit purposes over the Web to their Arthur Andersen
email addresses. (necessary now they no longer have access to Enron's
internal email system)

Please use the folder described below when passing any info (that you would
have concerns about if it was picked up by a third party) via the shared
drive that has been set up for this specific purpose.

Note:  AA should also use the shared drive to pass info back if there are
questions, or the data needs updating.  We should also consider the
sensitivity of audit findings and special presentations if they are being
distributed electronically.

Please pass this note to others in your groups who have the need to pass info
back and forth.

Details on how to access for those who will use this method to pass info:

A secured folder has been set up on the "o" drive under Corporate called
Arthur_Andersen (O:\Corporate\Arthur_Anderson).  Please post all confidential
files in this folder rather than emailing the files to their company email
address.  If you need access to this folder, submit an eRequest through the
IT Central site: http://itcentral.enron.com/Data/Services/SecurityRequests/.
Arthur Andersen will be able to retrieve these files for review with their
terminal server access at the Three Allen Center location.

Please contact Vanessa Schulte if you have any problems or questions

Beth Apollo


fyi...
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Truong, Dat
Sent:	Tuesday, October 30, 2001 5:06 PM
To:	Moorer, Torrey
Subject:	RE: Physical EOL deals bridging to Sitara - Done

Hello Torrey,
	I examined past CIG deals and made code changes to allow default meter 991764500 when Enron sells physical gas.  Assuming deals continue to be sent as before, I have results of sample deals production which I tested with; see below.  Please test the changes at your earliest convenient.  Thanks.

file://o:/_dropbox/sitara/CIG_buy_sell.doc

Dat Truong x 63015

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Moorer, Torrey
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 8:36 AM
To:	Truong, Dat
Subject:	FW: Physical EOL deals bridging to Sitara

Hi Dat,

As per Jay's request, is it possible to set the SITARA bridge to attach the following two default meter numbers to CIG Mainline deals, depending on whether they are buys or sales (from Enron's perspective)?

Essentially, any deal in which Enron is the seller and the location is at Pipe "CIG" and trade zone "CENTRAL" should have a default meter number of 991764500, while any deal in which Enron is the buyer at the same location should go to meter number UNA-516938.

Since the EOL mapping tables can only support one meter number per location, it would be necessary to set this logic up in the SITARA bridge itself. Is this doable from your end?

Torrey

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Reitmeyer, Jay
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 2:15 PM
To:	Moorer, Torrey
Cc:	Truong, Dat
Subject:	Physical EOL deals bridging to Sitara

I would like to have all sales of CIG Mainline next day physical gas to bridge over to Sitara under the following meter location:

CIG/Mainline/991764500

and all buys to

CIG/Mainline/UNA-516938

Please let me know what effects (if any) this will have on the bridging process, Sitara, and confirmations.

Thank you,

Jay Reitmeyer
713-853-3536


Thanks Maribel.  Call me for any questions.
Dick  3-6657

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Monterrey, Maribel
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 7:27 PM
To:	Panus, Stephanie; Bailey, Susan; Boyd, Samantha
Cc:	Heard, Marie; Robinson, Richard T.
Subject:	PH Glatfelter Company ISDA worksheet

Please see the PH Glatfelter Company ISDA worksheet. If you have any questions, please call me.

 << File: P H Glatfelter.xls >>

Thanks,
Maribel M Monterrey
Office: (713) 853-9048
Fax: (713) 853-9476
Maribel.Monterrey@enron.com


I'll get you one.  I'm replying real-time, using my Blackberry while in a meeting in California with Pickering.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)

-----Original Message-----
From: McCarty, Danny <Danny.McCarty@ENRON.com>
To: Hotte, Steve <Steve.Hotte@ENRON.com>
Sent: Mon Oct 22 14:08:34 2001
Subject:

Steve,
      I'd like to get one of the blackberry wireless handhelds.  How can I get one?
Dan


For the next few days, we will be reporting only positions, maturity gap, & VAR for the DPR.  We expect to be reporting P&L for ENA again probably by the middle of next week.

The 11/30 DPR is still listed on the ERV as preliminary, as there are still a couple small items outstanding.  The 12/3 and 12/4 DPRs should be out by tomorrow.  We are currently experiencing some IT issues related to position reporting which have prevented the reporting of these days.  I expect the issue to be resolved by the middle of the afternoon today and we will report shortly thereafter.

If you have any questions, please call me at 713 853 9123.

Thank you,

Shona Wilson

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wilson, Shona
Sent:	Tuesday, December 04, 2001 11:13 AM
To:	Abel, Chris; Aguilar, Darrell; Anderson, Patricia; Andrews, Naveen; Apollo, Beth; Beck, Sally; Belden, Tim; beth Apollo; Bowen Jr., Raymond; Bradford, William S.; Brooks, Loretta; Brown, Michael - COO London; Buy, Rick; Castleman, Kent; Causey, Richard; Chang, Hang; Chris Abel; Cockrell, Rainier; Colwell, Wes; Curry, Wanda; Darrell Aguilar; Day, Misti; Delainey, David W.; Dietrich, Janet; Dyson, Fernley; Fallon, Jim; Frevert, Mark; Gold, Joe; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; Green, Alisa; Haedicke, Mark E.; Hagelmann, Bjorn; Hall, D. Todd; Hanson, Kristen J.; Hardy, Trey; Hayden, Frank; Helton, Susan; Hickerson, Gary; Hillis, Kimberly; Hodges, Georgeanne; Jordan, Mike; Kaminski, Vince J; Kass, Michael; Kathol, Sherri; Khoja, Sayed; Killen, Faith; Kitchen, Louise; Lavorato, John; Lay, Kenneth; Martinez, David; Mayeux, Cassandra; Mcconnell, Mike; McKinney, Hal; McMahon, Jeffrey; Mills, Scott; Moscoso, Michael E.; Murphy, Ted; New, James; Piper, Greg; Port, David; Presto, Kevin M.; Schmidt, Darin; Schoppe, Tammie; Shankman, Jeffrey A.; Shepperd, Tammy R.; Sherriff, John; Talley, Darin; Thatcher, Stephen; Ueckert, Allen W.; Valdez, Veronica; Whalley, Greg; White, Stacey W.; Whiting, Greg
Subject:	11/30 and 12/3 DPR - update

With all of the events of yesterday, information for the DPR for the above dates is not yet complete.  At the present time, we are planning to issue a final DPR for the 30th of November as well as a preliminary and then final for the 3rd of December.  However, we do not yet have an estimated time for these to be issued.

I will keep you up to date when I have additional information.  If you have any questions, please call me at 713 853 9123.

Best regards

Shona Wilson
Director, Global Risk Operations
X39123


none

From: John J Lavorato/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/07/2001 07:46 AM
To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry
Arora/ENRON@enronXgate, Berney C Aucoin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D
Baughman/ENRON@enronXgate, Tim Belden/ENRON@enronXgate, Christopher F
Calger/ENRON@enronXgate, Derek Davies/CAL/ECT@ECT, Mark Dana
Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph Deffner/ENRON@enronXgate, Paul Devries/TOR/ECT@ECT,
W David Duran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris H Foster/ENRON@enronXgate, Chris
Gaskill/ENRON@enronXgate, Doug Gilbert-Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rogers
Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Josey/ENRON@enronXgate,
Kyle Kitagawa/CAL/ECT@ECT, Fred Lagrasta/ENRON@enronXgate, John J
Lavorato/ENRON@enronXgate, Eric LeDain/CAL/ECT@ECT, Laura
Luce/Corp/Enron@Enron, Thomas A Martin/ENRON@enronXgate, Jonathan
McKay/CAL/ECT@ECT, Ed McMichael/HOU/ECT@ECT, Don Miller/ENRON@enronXgate,
Michael L Miller/ENRON@enronXgate, Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT, Jean
Mrha/ENRON@enronXgate, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT,
Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Redmond/ENRON@enronXgate, Hunter S
Shively/ENRON@enronXgate, Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, "Swerzbin, Mike"
<Mike.Swerzbin2@ENRON.com>@SMTP@enronXgate, C John Thompson/ENRON@enronXgate,
Carl Tricoli/Corp/Enron@Enron, Barry Tycholiz/NA/Enron@ENRON, Frank W
Vickers/NA/Enron@Enron, Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Wolfe/ENRON@enronXgate,
Max Yzaguirre/NA/Enron@ENRON, John Zufferli/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

I asked everyone for their A/A needs and received very little feedback.
Please respond promptly.

Thanks

John


I know there is some case law out there on contracts being voided because
they are "unconscionable."  There are several examples in consumer law and
employment law, in which one contracting party is a corporation and the other
is a West Palm Beach voter.  However, if my memory serves me correctly, none
of them involve contracts between 2 sophisticated business entities such as
TW and Sempra or PG&E.  Absent evidence of fraud, courts uphold bargains
struck at arms length.
Kathy, I'd be happy to take the oars on this but if you've already done some
looking, please let me know if you've found anything.

	From:  Drew Fossum                           11/20/2000 04:44 PM

To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kathy Ringblom/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: gouging

Stuck on the phone so I thought I'd email you.  Stan has asked Mike Moran if
TW has any potential exposure on the high value transport deals under "anti
gouging" statutes or common law.  You know, the laws that say you can't
charge $100 per sheet of plywood during a hurricane or $50 for a bucket of
water during a drought.  I think we need to research two things:
1.  are there any such laws applicable to our business?  (Cal. state law
would probably be the best place to start)
2.  could the political/regulatory fight in Cal about power and gas prices
ever expand all the way to our transport pricing?  I.e., if the CPUC whacks
the power sellers for taking unfair advantage of their monopoly power, its
not a big leap for the CPUC or FERC or even U.S. congress to whack gas
sellers for jacking prices up to $14/MMBtu, as happened on Friday.  If that
happens, its just another small jump to whack us for charging $1 for
transport, or so the logic goes.  I'd like to hear preliminary views by 8:30
Monday am so I can talk to Mike before Stan's staff meeting (no written memo
necessary).  Based on that prelim. research, we can decide what else need s
to be done.  Thanks df


James,

I didn't see your name on the distribution for this so I'm forwarding it to
you.

Patti
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 07/10/2000 08:38 AM
---------------------------

Ernie
07/08/2000 07:01 AM
Sent by: Ernie
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Development Center Class Reminder  - James Scribner

James Scribner is scheduled to attend:

Wellhead to Burner Tip
Class Days and Times:
  7/18/2000  08:00:00 AM - 05:00:00 PM
  7/19/2000  08:00:00 AM - 12:00:00 PM

If James Scribner is unable to attend this class, the registration must be
canceled by 5:00 p.m. on July 13, 2000 to prevent a charge of $ 600 to your
RC number.

Thank you for your support in providing quality and cost effective
development opportunites at Enron.
Please call the Development Center Team at 713-853-0357 if you have any
questions.

 Thank you.


dave forster.


Date:  Monday, October 29, 2001
Time:  1:30 p.m. - 3:30 p.m.
Dial-in number:  403-216-0900
Code:  6714#
(Chair Code:  7485#)
Confirmation # 185000
Tony Palmer wrote: Gentlemen,
Yesterday, Enron provided comments on the MOU which raise several new issues of substance. TransCanada & Westcoast recommend that these matters be deferred and included with our discussions on the commercial proposal and the Partnership Agreement, as we have agreed on a number of other issues.
As we discussed on Tuesday's conference call, we believe the first priority for ANNGTC is to finalize the MOU now, & put it "on ice", to permit all parties to obtain the required governance approvals by Nov. 15 - also the press release would be drafted, circulated & approved and ready to go at that time.
Secondly, the commercial proposal to ANS Producers must be initiated in early November to meet a mid-Dec. deadline. This proposal will of necessity have the group addressing the large commercial alternatives in order to establish a viable and attractive project.
We recommend a conference call on Monday @ 1:30 PM (Mountain time) to finalize the MOU - we will arrange a dial-in #.. Please provide your comments on the MOU to Murray & I today.
Tony
"Gadd, Eric" wrote:
Please see the attached red-line with our comments.
In paragraph 8, I've proposed new language to address that pre-existing
residual claims must be satisfactorily addressed before a new
partnership agreement would be executed.  Also, I've outlined the
possibility for other forms of ownership than just a partnership.
In paragraph 9, I've outlined a non-exhaustive list of issues to be
addressed in the joint development and coordination agreement.
During the next round of discussions following the MOU, I would like to
explore the merits of rejoining partners having the right to rejoin as
either a developing or non-developing party.  The outline structure I
propose would be as follows-
- In either case, ownership levels are as set out in the MOU
- A developing party would have full voting rights and full financial
responsibility during the development phase
- A non-developing party would make MOU payments but otherwise not have
voting rights or financial responsibility
- A non-developing party could become a developing party at a specific
time in the future and upon specific terms
- Non-developing parties would agree to release their claims for AFUDC
and interest to the extent commercially necessary
Regards,
Eric Gadd
-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Palmer [mailto:tony_palmer@transcanada.com ]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 3:13 PM
To: Steve Patrick; Bill Purcell; Peter Lund; Byron Wright; Gadd, Eric;
Jim Moore; cavan carlton; brad reese; Steve Schroeder
Cc: Murray Birch; Donna Friesen
Subject: ANNGTC MOU
Now that the collective letter is on its way, could I request that you
please provide your comments on the MOU language Donna sent to you
yesterday.
Comments tomorrow AM would permit us to finalize this week.
Thanks,
Tony
**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************
   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Name: MOU Letters Oct 23 Enron.doc
                                           Type: Microsoft Word Document (application/msword)
    MOU Letters Oct 23 Enron.doc       Encoding: base64
                                    Description: MOU Letters Oct 23 Enron.doc
                                Download Status: Not downloaded with message


These have been changed - and I changed the broker fee in 586569 to $15 flat.

Stephanie Piwetz   04/19/2001 02:19 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Kimberly Indelicato/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: APS/Bloomberg 4/19

Please ch cp name for 2 bloomberg trades from Pinnacle to Arizona.....
w/ contact names

586507.01  Leaf H.
586569.01 Tom A.

Thanks


I will be out of the office today, October 19th and will be back in the office October 22th.  For anything urgent, please contact my assistant, Maggy at 81-3-5219-4554.


I'll make sure that you're on this distribution list (you're not currently on
it, right?).

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/26/2001 06:07 PM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	04/26/2001 05:42 PM

		 To: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Angela Schwarz/HOU/EES@EES, Beverly
Aden/HOU/EES@EES, Bill Votaw/HOU/EES@EES, Brenda Barreda/HOU/EES@EES, Carol
Moffett/HOU/EES@EES, Cathy Corbin/HOU/EES@EES, Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Christina Liscano/HOU/EES@EES, Craig H Sutter/HOU/EES@EES, Dan
Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Debora Whitehead/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES,
Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Dorothy Youngblood/HOU/ECT@ECT, Douglas
Huth/HOU/EES@EES, Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Eric Melvin/HOU/EES@EES,
Erika Dupre/HOU/EES@EES, Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Fran Deltoro/HOU/EES@EES,
Gayle W Muench/HOU/EES@EES, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@ENRON, Gordon
Savage/HOU/EES@EES, Harold G Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@ENRON, Iris Waser/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, James Wright/Western
Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, Jeff Messina/HOU/EES@EES, Jeremy
Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Jess Hewitt/HOU/EES@EES, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathy Bass/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy
Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES, Ken Gustafson/HOU/EES@EES, Kevin Hughes/HOU/EES@EES,
Leasa Lopez/HOU/EES@EES, Leticia Botello/HOU/EES@EES, Mark S
Muller/HOU/EES@EES, Marsha Suggs/HOU/EES@EES, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES,
Meredith M Eggleston/HOU/EES@EES, Michael Etringer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Mann/HOU/EES@EES, Michelle D Cisneros/HOU/ECT@ECT, mpalmer@enron.com, Neil
Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Neil Hong/HOU/EES@EES, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Paula
Warren/HOU/EES@EES, Richard L Zdunkewicz/HOU/EES@EES, Richard
Leibert/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON, Rita
Hennessy/NA/Enron@ENRON, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, Rosalinda
Tijerina/HOU/EES@EES, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES,
Sharon Dick/HOU/EES@EES, skean@enron.com, Tanya Leslie/HOU/EES@EES, Tasha
Lair/HOU/EES@EES, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terri Greenlee/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tim
Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tony Spruiell/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES,
Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathryn Corbally/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jubran
Whalan/HOU/EES@EES, triley@enron.com, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert C
Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Greg Wolfe/HOU/ECT@ECT, James
Wright/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, Dirk vanUlden/Western
Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, Steve Walker/SFO/EES@EES, Jennifer
Rudolph/HOU/EES@EES, Martin Wenzel/SFO/HOU/EES@EES, Douglas
Condon/SFO/EES@EES, wgang@enron.com, Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>,
Hedy Govenar <hgovenar@govadv.com> @ ENRON, jklauber@llgm.com, Mike D
Smith/HOU/EES@EES, John Neslage/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Janel
Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Eric Letke/DUB/EES@EES, Richard B
Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, gfergus@brobeck.com, Michael Tribolet/ENRON@enronXgate,
Robert Frank/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT,
gfergus@brobeck.com, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: CA Legislative Committee Hearing on California Border Gas Prices

FYI.  This is the presentation that the Brattle Group---a consulting group
that Edison has long used on gas issues in California---gave last week to the
legislative committee investigating wholesale gas prices at the California
Border.  The day following this presentation (which was followed by a
presentation by the California PUC's FERC lawyer), the committee called El
Paso and Dynegy to respond to Brattle's and the CPUC FERC lawyer's
presentations.  Also attached is the best synopsis of the hearing that I've
seen in the press.

Best,
Jeff
******************************************************************************
****************************************************
Competing evidence clouds Calif. investigation

Prompted in part by the California Public Utilities Commission, the
California Assembly
has been scrutinizing the role that interstate pipelines have played in the
state,s current
energy crisis. In the efforts to find a smoking gun, legislators have leaned
heavily on a
report prepared by The Brattle Group, a consultancy commissioned by utility
Southern California
Edison to dig up evidence of market power abuse.

But the state,s biggest transporter of gas to California -- El Paso Natural
Gas -- is not
ready to take the rap. The pipeline has commissioned its own study, which it
recently presented
as evidence that it has not circumvented any laws or regulation.

As reported in both the trade press and national media, SoCal Ed and the CPUC
are pointing
the finger of blame at El Paso for alleged manipulation of California border
prices through
affiliate deals and capacity hoarding. And exhibit A in their case against El
Paso is The Brattle
Group,s study of the California market.

Richard Zeiger, a spokesman for Assembly Member Darrell Steinberg, chairman
of the
California Assembly Judiciary Committee, told Gas Daily that The Brattle
Group,s market
study proved that the surge in gas prices at the California border was not
caused by normal
market forces (GD 4/20). His remarks followed an oversight hearing during
which Assembly
members questioned Dynegy and El Paso officials about their involvement in
the California
market.

El Paso presented a different version of events to the Assembly. In a report
presented to
legislators, a research group hired by El Paso concluded that a convergence
of factors, not a
conspiracy, caused the price run-up.

Lukens Consulting Group, a Houston-based consultancy, was retained by El Paso
to conduct
work on several fronts. In its study of the California market, Lukens
concluded that the
increasing convergence of the gas and electricity businesses was one of the
main culprits in the
California gas price imbroglio.

Assemblyman John Campbell, a Republican member of the oversight committee,
said he
"didn,t see any smoking gun" in either report.

"We had our committee hearing, and we certainly had a lot on the Brattle
Study and a little
on the Lukens study. To some degree, I,m not sure that the California
legislature is the best
place to adjudicate the differences between these two studies," Campbell
said. "I believe FERC
is looking at this situation " and it would seem to me that that,s the
appropriate place."

Campbell said that the CPUC had been prodding the California legislature to
give support
to its claims of market power abuse by pipelines. "It,s being pushed
basically by the Public
Utilities Commission here, which believes that there was collusion" by
pipeline companies to
push up gas prices in California, he said.

The CPUC, Campbell suggested, sought satisfaction before the California
assembly when
it had failed on the federal level: "There,s a concerted effort, not just on
natural gas but on other
things here in California, for entities and organizations here to point the
finger elsewhere for
the problems that we,re having in this state and I think you,re seeing some
of that with the
public utilities commission."

Whether either report wins over the public incensed by high natural gas
prices is a different
matter entirely. In the meanwhile, the dueling California market studies seem
to have taken
on a life of their own.

The Brattle Group Study, for instance, has become the center of a heavily
litigated effort to
force FERC to compel the release of market data by California market
participants. Following
on a request by SoCal Ed, which said it needed additional data to round out
The Brattle Group
report, FERC Chief ALJ Curtis Wagner issued subpoenas to the other three
major pipelines that
serve the state as well as to Sempra Energy Trading.

Several parties resisted FERC,s call for market information, saying the
requested data
contained commercially sensitive information. FERC allowed the discovery
process to move
forward but only after attaching strict data protection rules restricting
access to evidence
(GD 4/23).

Critics of the pipeline industry have already suffered one setback in their
case. The commission
recently dismissed the CPUC,s claim that El Paso rigged the auction of a
large block of
pipeline capacity in favor of affiliate El Paso Merchant Energy. In
addressing the California
Assembly, representatives of Dynegy said that FERC,s recent ruling on the
California border
controversy obviated the need for more investigation.

The controversy, however, is far from over. FERC last month also ordered a
hearing into
whether El Paso Natural Gas and its affiliates manipulated capacity to drive
up the price of gas
delivered into California (GD 3/29). That hearing is likely to take place
this summer. (RP00-
241, et al.) NH

----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/26/2001 05:23 PM -----

	Douglas.Porter@sce.com
	04/19/2001 11:36 AM

		 To: jeff.dasovich@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Sacramento Pres Final 4_13_01(projected).ppt

Per your request, attached are the presentation slides from yesterday.

Douglas Porter, Senior Attorney
Southern California Edison Company
(626)302-3964
(626)302-3990(fax)
douglas.porter@sce.com(See attached file: DRT2486.PPT)
 - DRT2486.PPT


Attached is a forecast for the rest of the summer for the X (NWP and PGT).

We should try to have a conference call with the west desk to discuss as soon
as we can.

Chris


COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION CORPORATION
                        NOTICE TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES
                                NOVEMBER 19, 2001

Notice ID: 3278
5 - NO RESPONSE REQUIRED

SUBJECT:  CAPACITY UPDATE EFFECTIVE FOR TUESDAY,NOVEMBER 20, 2001

                 CHANGES ARE INDICATED WITH AN *

Effective Tuesday, November 20, 2001, capacities will be as follows:

Excess MDWQ              Available +
ISS Withdrawals          Available
SIT Withdrawals          Available
Imbalance Drawdowns      Available

Excess MDIQ              NOT Available +
ISS Injections           NOT Available
SIT Injections           NOT Available
Imbalance Paybacks       NOT Available

PAL Lends/Unparks        Available
PAL Parks/Loan Paybacks  NOT Available

+ Call Gas Control 24 hours in advance at (304) 357-2606 to request approval.

Non-firm receipt capacity will be as follows:

TENNESSEE:

Brinker (B12)            20,000
Broad Run (B9)          450,000
Cambridge (B10)               0
Dungannon (B11)          20,000
Highland (B17)                0
Milford (B18)            20,000
North Greenwood (B22)         0
Unionville (B15)         50,000

TEXAS EASTERN:

Delmont (C16)            10,000
Eagle (C22)              20,000
Hooker (C9)              20,000
Pennsburg (C23)          20,000
Windridge (C12)          20,000

NATIONAL FUEL:

Independence (M1)             0
Ellwood City (L1)        15,000

TRANSCO:

Downingtown (E3)          2,500
Emporia I (E13)          60,000
Rockville (E2)           60,000
Dranesville (E1)         50,000

EQUITABLE GAS:

Hi Hat (F3)                   0

KENTUCKY WEST VIRGINIA (KYWV):

Beaver Creek (H1)             0

CNR PIPELINE:

Boldman (CNR02)               0
Conoway (CNR03)               0
Johns Creek (CNR08)           0
Canada (CNR09)                0
Canada (CNR10)                0
Stafford (CNR11)              0
Thacker/Majestic (CNR12)      0
Briar Mtn. (CNR13)            0
Huff Creek (CNR14)            0
Wiser (827280)                0

CONOCO:                       0

Delta Natural Gas (819288)    0
Grant (P1)                    0

NOTE:  ANY APPALACHIAN PRODUCTION FLOWING DIRECTLY INTO COLUMBIA'S LINE KA
BETWEEN COLUMBIA'S BOLDMAN COMPRESSOR STATION AND COLUMBIA'S HUFF CREEK
COMPRESSOR STATION AS WELL AS PRODUCTION FLOWING INTO COLUMBIA'S LINES SM-116,
KA-15, PM-3, AND PM-17 IS 0 NON-FIRM.

ALGONQUIN:

Ramapo (R1)              25,000

ANR:

Paulding/Cecil           30,000
(F1, A2)

LEBANON AGGREGATE       100,000
(A4, F2, C4, D3)

TOLEDO AGGREGATE        100,000
(A3, F4, 734462)

COLUMBIA GULF:
(801)

TCO-Leach               700,000

Internal point non-firm capacity will be as follows:

Lanham                        0

Delivery capacity (non-firm) will be as follows:

TRANSCO:

Martins Creek            10,000
  (MLI E5)
Young Woman's Creek      10,000
  (MLI E9)

ALGONQUIN:

Hanover                       0
  (MLI R2)

EQUITRANS:

Fallen Timber            31,000
  (MLI K1)

Waynesburg-Rhinehart     20,000
  (MLI K2)

OPT-30 will be available in all market areas.
OPT-60 will be available in all market areas.

Market Area delivery capacity (non-firm) will be as follows:

Operating Area 1
     Market Area 33      30,000 *
     Market Area 34      20,000 *

Operating Area 2
     Market Area 20       No Restrictions

Operating Area 3
     Market Area 15       No Restrictions
     Market Area 16       No Restrictions
     Market Area 17       No Restrictions
     Market Area 18       No Restrictions
     Market Area 19       No Restrictions

Operating Area 4
     Market Area 21      10,000 *
     Market Area 22      10,000 *
     Market Area 23      20,000 *
     Market Area 24      10,000 *
     Market Area 25       No Restrictions
     Market Area 29       No Restrictions

Operating Area 5
     Market Area 02       No Restrictions
     Market Area 07       No Restrictions

Operating Area 6
     Market Area 10       No Restrictions
     Market Area 11       No Restrictions
     Market Area 12       No Restrictions
     Market Area 13       No Restrictions
     Market Area 14       No Restrictions

Operating Area 7
     Market Area 01       No Restrictions
     Market Area 03       No Restrictions
     Market Area 04       No Restrictions
     Market Area 05       No Restrictions
     Market Area 06       No Restrictions
     Market Area 08       No Restrictions
     Market Area 09       No Restrictions

Operating Area 8
     Market Area 26       No Restrictions
     Market Area 27       No Restrictions
     Market Area 32       No Restrictions
     Market Area 35       No Restrictions
     Market Area 36       No restrictions for southern part of Market Area 36.
                          Primary receipts/deliveries only for gas delivered
                          in the northern portion of Market Area 36.
     Market Area 38       No Restrictions
     Market Area 39       No Restrictions
     Market Area 40       No Restrictions

NOTE:  GAS DELIVERED IN THE NORTHERN PORTION OF MARKET AREA 38 OR THE NORTHERN
PORTION OF MARKET AREA 36 MUST BE RECEIVED FROM TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE AT
HIGHLAND.

Operating Area 10
     Market Area 28       No Restrictions
     Market Area 30       No Restrictions
     Market Area 31       No Restrictions

If you have any questions, please contact your Account
Representative.


The meeting originally schedule for 3pm today will not take place.  There are no significant issues and several key players are out of the office.
Thank you.


fyi


Mr. Holtz,

At the request of Fred Lagrasta, I am enclosing a sample copy of the
referenced Master Agreement.  This agreement is subject to Legal and Credit
review of the counterparty.  If you have any comments or questions, please do
not hesitate to call me at (713) 853-3399 or Fred at (713) 853-6529.  We look
forward to hearing from you.

Tana Jones
Sr. Legal Specialist


Jean, I'm on the road in Houston and can't get into PEP.  It doesn't show up
as an icon on the laptop when I get online throught the dial up program.
Please let me know how to get into it as I've got about a hundred reviews to
do and I'll be on the road constantly for a couple weeks.  Thanks. dF


Attached please find the log report for the week of Dec 10-17th, as of Dec
12th.  Should you have any questions please feel free to contact me at  ext.
54751.


don't you feel better about the whole situation now?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Husser, Shanna
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 11:22 AM
To:	Bass, Eric
Subject:	FW: is there anyone else who wants in on it?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Joseph, Mary
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 9:36 AM
To:	Sharp, Michelle; Husser, Shanna; Sharp, Jason
Subject:	is there anyone else who wants in on it?

Nov. 12, 2001, 10:23PM
Jackson says coalition wants role in energy deal
By NELSON ANTOSH
Copyright 2001 Houston Chronicle
Activist Jesse Jackson says the Rainbow/PUSH Coalition intends to be a part of the regulatory process leading to the closing of the Enron-Dynegy deal.
The organization, which he founded, owns Enron stock and shares in several other large Houston-based energy firms.
"Dynegy needs our participation to get approval," Jackson said Monday.
The organization's interest in the acquisition of Enron by Dynegy is in assuring minority inclusion in any possible spinoffs, employment, contract commitments and EEOC rulings.
Jackson is here for the first annual energy summit conducted by the Houston bureau of the Rainbow/PUSH Coalition Wall Street Project. The summit continues today in the Hyatt Regency downtown.
Those companies played a role in this conference that suggests they are in touch with Jackson already. On Monday he praised Enron head Ken Lay's integrity although the Enron executive is on the other end of the political spectrum.
Lay and Dynegy's chief executive officer, Chuck Watson, would have been at the group's energy summit if it weren't for the announcement last week that turned everything topsy-turvy, Jackson said.
The coalition opened its Houston bureau in May on Smith Street so it can do research, go to annual meetings and distribute information, Jackson said.
Protests and boycotts are not part of the plan, said William-Paul Thomas, the bureau chief here.
The Rainbow/PUSH Coalition, which Jackson heads, has taken an interest in energy and Houston in particular, as demonstrated by his appearance at the Offshore Technology Conference here early this year.
Blacks and Hispanics have been locked out of employment, upper-level management and contracts, Jackson said.
Jackson lamented the lack of emphasis on energy security now that the nation's attention has turned to terrorists and anthrax.
He also took the opportunity, in an interview, to criticize President Bush's plans for stimulating the economy from the top down, with a tax plan that will benefit large corporations to the tune of billions of dollars.
"It must be bottom up," Jackson said.
One-third of Rainbow/PUSH Coalition's idea for economic stimulation is travel vouchers, worth $1,000 each and good for up to six months.
This would help employment in the hard-hit travel and vacation industries during the holiday season, he said.

Thanks,
Mary
713-853-0914


Hi again:

Fast response, I know.  I was sending a message to Travis when yours came in,
so I'll reply right away.  I would like to put in $35 if that is okay with
you - I'm not sure what the grand total would be.  Good luck again with nanny
search.  Glad to hear that everyone is well.  Hard to believe, but Britta, my
oldest, just had her 14th birthday last week!!  They grow so quickly and are
so precious.  Take care,

Mary

	Carol St Clair
	11/29/00 11:06 AM

		 To: Mary J Heinitz/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Nanny Search

Mary:
Thanks for the info and I will check with Stacy.  I am planning to return
sometime around January 8th assuming I can find someone.  I have thoroughly
enjoyed my time at home and hope that the transition back to work goes
smoothily.  I'm sure it will take me a few weeks to get back into it after
being away from it for 6 months.  Charles is doing great as is Arthur.  Look
forward to seeing you soon.  Would $25 be okay with you for Suzanne's gift?

Carol

	Mary J Heinitz
	11/28/00 05:02 PM

		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Nanny Search

Hi Carol:

Good to hear from you again.  It is 4th quarter-as-usual around here.  Sorry
I didn't get back to you earlier about Suzanne, but yes, I am interested in
chipping in on that.  It's a great idea, and Suzanne should love it!  Let me
know how much I should contribute.  As for your nanny question, I can't help
you there.   Have you asked Stacy Dickson if she is using an agency, or
whether her sister used an agency?  They are much more recently in the market
for this.  Hope they can help you out - good luck!  I am sure it is not going
to be easy to come back.  Have you set a date for your return yet?

Mary

	Carol St Clair
	11/28/00 10:51 AM

		 To: Mary J Heinitz/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Nanny Search

Mary:
I am beginning the process of looking for a nanny and was wondering if you
may know of someone or know of an agency that you trust.  We are looking for
someone to commute to our house each day.  If you do know of someone, please
let me know.  Also,  on Suzanne's gift, looks like so far it's me and Sheila
contributing.  Are you interested?

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


http://energycommerce.house.gov/107/news/layletter.pdf

Wasn't sure if you wanted to read the whole letter.  Here it is , if so.

Stacey


Here is that email I told you about last night.  I'm sure Wall Street feels
the same way about the pipeline group.  DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 01/19/2000
09:53 AM ---------------------------

John Enerson@ECT
01/13/2000 01:44 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: CIBC World Markets - Daily Teletimes

---------------------- Forwarded by John Enerson/HOU/ECT on 01/13/2000 01:44
PM ---------------------------
From: Jean Mrha@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS on 12/17/99 01:25 PM
To: John Enerson
cc:
Subject: CIBC World Markets - Daily Teletimes

----- Forwarded by Jean Mrha/Enron Communications on 12/17/99 01:26 PM -----

	Jay Hawthorn
	12/17/99 10:00 AM

		 To: Tom Gros/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc: Tom Huntington/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Jean
Mrha/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Kristina Lund/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Rob McDonald/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Scott Pleus/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Jones/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, David Cox/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Mitch Olson/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Ted
Seitz/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Bill Abler/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
		 Subject: CIBC World Markets - Daily Teletimes

FYI, a daily report put out by CIBC illustrating their view on the emerging
market...

Daily Teletimes  CIBC World Markets

We had a very informative meeting with Enron,s management yesterday--Jeff
Skilling, CEO of Enron (ENE - Buy) as well as Ken Rice, CEO of Enron
Communications and their Software VP, David Berberian and others. Enron has
built out a substantial fiber network and begun to make substantial moves
towards developing a bandwidth trading market.  We don,t believe that a lot
of telecom investors understand how well thought out and agressive Enron
plans on being in this market.  It appears that Enron is now planning to
articulate its strategy- specifically at their investor conference on January
20th in New York.  While details will have to wait until the 20th, Enron is
essentially aiming to build a gateway tieing in all the major long-distance
networks, guaranteeing premium quality and pricing in doing so (i.e. a
&Network of Networks8).  While ENE does plan to use its own network to carry
traffic, it plans to focus largely on seamlessly integrating capacity bought
on other carriers networks.  Operationally, this boils down to a very smart
switching system that gives customers the capabilities and reliability of a
single network at the front-end while integrating capacity sourced from
multiple networks on the back end, creating more robust overall transport
capabilities.  ENE believes that this integration of multiple networks will
offer greater path diversity, reliability, and efficiency than any
single-network solution.  We note that Enron,s multi-sourcing approach is
tailor-made to foster the development of a robust capacity trading market (as
discussed in our recent bandwidth trading report).  Given Enron,s dominance
of the electricity and natural gas markets, we believe that there is no
better positioned company to create and capitalize on such a market in
bandwidth.   While we await further details, we did leave the meeting with a
much greater understanding of and confidence in ENE,s overall telecom
strategy.  We believe that their telecom business could create tens of
billions of dollars of shareholder value if ENE executes well.  We recommend
that telecom investors make an effort to attend the Jan. 20 meeting.

Tim Horan 212-667-5459


John,

I would like to swap out some cal 04 with you.  We are long 2 a day with you
out there.  We are under new parameters here.  So this will allow us to
continue to trade with you.

Thanks,

Steve
302-452-6930


print
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 10/10/2000
12:38 PM ---------------------------

Rick Bergsieker@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
10/10/2000 11:43 AM
To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman@ECT
cc: david.haug@enron.com
Subject: HIGH PRIORITY: CORRECTED -- Fwd: ENRON article in POTEN's LNGWM

fyi---this article has gone to press and will be published shortly by Poten &
Partners.
---------------------- Forwarded by Rick Bergsieker/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
10/10/2000 10:34 AM ---------------------------

"Avgerinos, Gabriel" <GAvgerinos@Poten.com> on 10/03/2000 01:12:09 PM
To: "'rick.bergsieker@enron.com'" <rick.bergsieker@enron.com>,
"'clay.harris@enron.com'" <clay.harris@enron.com>
cc: "Spadine, Frank" <FSpadine@Poten.com>, "Johnson, Anne Marie"
<AMJohnson@Poten.com>

Subject: HIGH PRIORITY: CORRECTED -- Fwd: ENRON article in POTEN's LNGWM

========================================

From: MS Exchange::GFA
To: Harris, Clay at Enron; Bergsieker, Rick at Enron
cc: Spadine, Frank at Poten & Partners
Subject: ENRON article in POTEN's LNGWM
Date: 10/3/00 11:05 AM

Dear Rick and Clay:

I thought you you would be interested in a "look-in-advance" at the article
about Enron LNG to be published by POTEN in this month's LNG IN WORLD
MARKETS.

Clay, sorry I missed you this time around in September when I was in the
Middle East.  For your guidance, we heard a lot of nice things from OLNG
management about you guys -- and well deserved I may add.

Best regards,

Gabriel F. Avgerinos
General Manager
LNG & Gas Consulting
POTEN & PARTNERS, INC.
phone: 212-230-2035
fax:       212-355-0295
email:    gavgerinos@poten.com

 - 11524_2.DOC


Start Date: 4/25/01; HourAhead hour: 19;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042519.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/25/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_SCOUT
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 19 / Preferred: -250.00 / Final: -200.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/25/01
  TRADING_SC: ECH1
  PNT_OF_INTRC: SP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 1
  DEAL_NO: 1


Left these two off original list:

Director  Stephen Schwarz Satisfactory
Sr. Director  Steve Jackson  Strong
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 06/23/2000 01:31 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Sally Beck                           06/23/2000 11:45 AM

To: Sharron Westbrook/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: PRC Pre-ratings

	Superior	Excellent	Strong	Satisfactory	Needs Improv.	Issues
Directors	Todd Hall		Susan Harrison
			Scott Mills
			Eugenio Perez
			Bob Superty
			Sheri Thomas
			Steve Ventoratos

Sr. Directors	Kristin Albrecht	Mary Solmonson	Brenda Herod
	Leslie Reeves	Sheila Glover	James Scribner

VP		Brent Price	Peggy Hedstrom


Ken and Jeff have decided that the Enron Executive Committee Retreat will
include only the Corporate Policy Committee this year.  (See list of members
below.)  You may be holding the timeframe of January 16-18, 2001 on your
calendar, which you can now free up if you are not on the committee.

The location of the retreat is under consideration.  When a decision is made,
we will get the information to the members of the Corporate Policy
Committee.  Departure for the retreat will be early afternoon on Tuesday,
January 16 with return to Houston late afternoon on Thursday, January 18.

Please don't hesitate to call me if you have any questions at 713-853-6088.

Rosie

Enron Policy Committee

Baxter, Cliff
Causey, Rick
Derrick, Jim
Fastow, Andy
Frevert, Mark
Hannon, Kevin
Horton, Stan
Kean, Steve
Lay, Ken
Pai, Lou
Rice, Ken
Skilling, Jeff
Whalley, Greg


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 12/12/2000 08:56 AM -----

	Denis O'Connell
	12/12/2000 03:35 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Matthew Dawson/LON/ECT@ECT, Richard Sage/LON/ECT@ECT, Craig
Chaney/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: ERS NDA

Done -Richard sewnt it to Craig

From: Tana Jones on 11/12/2000 11:07 CST
To: Matthew Dawson/LON/ECT@ECT, Denis O'Connell/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: ERS NDA

What's the scoop on getting this signed?
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 12/11/2000 11:09 AM -----

	Tana Jones
	12/07/2000 10:24 AM

		 To: Matthew Dawson/LON/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Denis O'Connell/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: ERS NDA

Matt and Denis,

Can you help us with this NDA we need executed for an EnronCredit. meeting on
Monday?  If you could print it out on EnronCredit.com letterhead and have
Denis initial it for signature.  Because of time, Leslie can't initial this
before we execute it, but we promise she will initial it before we send it
out to the customer.  Then, can you have it executed by an officer of
EnronCredit.com and return it to me at fax nol 713/646-3490.

Thanks for your help!
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 12/07/2000 10:20 AM -----

	Leslie Hansen
	12/07/2000 08:54 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: ERS NDA

Tana:

Please finalize the ERS Holdings LLC NDA attached below for execution at your
earliest convenience.

Thanks,

Leslie


Start Date: 3/16/01; HourAhead hour: 3;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001031603.txt


I'm glad she sounds so good.  Maybe she can be a back up for next Thursday.

Kay

"Neil Mann" <nmann@erac.com> on 10/12/2000 02:45:08 PM
Please respond to <nmann@erac.com>
To: "C. Kay Mann (E-mail)" <Kay.Mann@Enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Choc

Just got off the phone and she wants to pick Michael up from school on
Friday the 27th. I told her we would be home around noon on Sunday and she
said that was find but they might be out and about! She sounded great! She
is busy on the 21st so I thought I would try grandma again. I plan on
stopping by this evening to work on the pager issue.


Here's the transfer document from Kern

Julie  :-)

---------------------- Forwarded by Julie A Gomez/HOU/ECT on 04/09/2001 02:58
PM ---------------------------

"Partin, Jan S" <Jan.S.Partin@Williams.com> on 04/09/2001 12:24:25 PM
To: "'jgomez@enron.com'" <jgomez@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: ASSIGNMENT AND CONSENT TO ASSIGNMENT

 <<Firm Transport Assignment.doc>>

Julie,
???? Here is our standard Assignment and Consent to Assignment for firm
transportation agreements.? Please review and if you have any areas of
concern please let me know.? My telephone is (801)584-6850 and fax is

(801)584-6444.

??????? ??????? ??????? ??????? ??????? ??????? Sincerely,

??????? ??????? ??????? ??????? ??????? ??????? Jan Partin

 - Firm Transport Assignment.doc


Folks,

Rob Lamkin has called a special board of directors meeting for Thursday,
August 31 at 10 am.  You can either attend (encouraged) at Rob's Walnut
Creek office, 1350 Treat Blvd, across from the BART Station and the WC
Embassy Suites.  Rob is providing Filet Mignon sandwiches for lunch.
The rest of you can call in at

312-470-0064
PC 51280

We have three agenda items:

1.  WSJ Data Request - Gary
2.  WPTF Position on FERC Order - Dan
3.  WPTF Position on CM Reform Proposal by the PX - Czarnecki

I'll be at the Walnut Creek site for the call.  Who , besides Rob will
join me?

gba


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 07/09/2001 06:07 PM -----

	"Delaney Hunter" <dhunter@s-k-w.com> 07/09/2001 06:08 PM Please respond to dhunter 	   To: "Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)" <jdasovic@enron.com>  cc:   Subject: More on FERC generator hearings

-----Original Message-----
From: McEvoy, Bridget [mailto:Bridget.McEvoy@ElPaso.com]
BN  18:06 Talks Between California, Generators End; No Accord (Correct)

(Corrects lead to say judge recommended FERC hearings to

result disagreements; adds comments from judge in fifth paragraph

and comments from Enron in 13th paragraph.)

     Washington, July 9 (Bloomberg) -- A judge who oversaw two

weeks of unsuccessful negotiations aimed at persuading power

sellers to pay refunds in California and other western states

recommended that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission hold

hearings to resolve disagreements within 60 days.

     Two weeks of FERC-ordered talks ended today with the two

sides no closer to an accord.

     ``In 15 days, you can't work miracles,'' said Curtis Wagner,
FERC's chief administrative law judge. ``The numbers were too far

apart.''

      California says it is due a refund of $8.9 billion because

the companies charged excessive prices. Other western states are

also requesting money.

     A group of power sellers offered $510 million to California

during the negotiations, scoffing at the state's method of

calculating the refund, Wagner said. Other parties to the talks

offered about $206 million, bringing the total offer from

generators to $716 million.

      On Saturday, the state brought in analysts who explained how

the state calculated its estimate. He wasn't convinced by

California's arguments that it should receive $8.9 billion, said

Wagner, who wouldn't provide his own estimate of how much should

be paid.

     Wagner said FERC should hold hearings of 60 days or less and

should calculate a refund based on a system it approved for price

caps on June 18. The caps are based on the costs of the highest

priced generator during the early stages of a power shortage.

      That formula should be applied retroactively to Oct. 1,

Wagner said. He wouldn't provide an estimate of the size of such a

refund, saying it would require research into fuel prices from

that time period.

     Michael Kahn, California's chief negotiator, said the judge's

recommendation was a victory for his state. Wagner's formula would

give his state a refund of ``several billion dollars,'' and

California will sue to get the rest, he said.

     ``The judge said we're entitled to our money without

releasing any of our claims,'' Kahn told reporters.

     Generators were mixed on what Wagner's recommendations meant,

though they agreed the state asked for too much.

    ``Under the faulty methodology the state has come up with (to

justify the $8.9 billion refund), we would be owed money because

we bought more than we sold in the spot market in the period in

question,'' said Mark Palmer, a spokesman for Enron Corp, one of

the power sellers taking part in the negotiations. ``That's shows

how ridiculous this is.''

    Houston-based Enron didn't participate in the offer to refund

$510 million, Palmer said, without being more specific.

     ``Nothing I've seen suggests that California cares about a

settlement,'' Palmer said. ``What they care about is shifting

blame. What they care about is a witch hunt.''

     Duke Energy Corp. is ``very pleased'' by the judge's

recommendations, said Brent Bailey, vice president and general

counsel of the Charlotte-based company. The judge's plan fixes

problems with California's methodology for calculating the

refunds, he said.

      California's two biggest utilities have piled up almost $14

billion in debt because of the surging prices that resulted when

the state's plan to deregulate its electricity system failed. The

state began buying power on the utilities' behalf in January and

has spent close to $8 billion.

--Amy Strahan Butler and Jeff Bliss in Washington (202) 624-1975

or jbliss@bloomberg.net and in Washington/mmw/alp/mmw

Bridget McEvoy
Investor Relations
El Paso Corp.
713.420.5597
Bridget.McEvoy@elpaso.com

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender.
******************************************************************


I apologize for accidentally hitting the wrong button and sending the below
e-mail.  Here's the rest of my e-mail:

1. (cont'd.) and any other form language typically used.

2. confirmation that MG Metals indeed paid the freight to ICTS in advance for
all the shipments to Scottsborough.

3.  copies of anything that MG Metals has received in the past from this
carrier, ICTS or Scottsborough regarding these particular dispute.

I will keep you closely advised.

Britt

----- Forwarded by Britt Davis/Corp/Enron on 12/06/2000 02:47 PM -----

	Britt Davis
	12/06/2000 02:47 PM

		 To: Nicole Dion/NA/Enron@Enron, Marcus Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Becky Zikes/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: In re ICTS

I have received a telefax from Scottsborough, our good customer, which
attaches the lawsuit filed by the trucker against it and ICTS, in Alabama
state court.  The complaint prays for recovery of about $15,000, plus
interest and attorneys' fees.  I was not sent the service papers, which would
allow me to confirm Scottsborough's advice that its "return date" is December
16 (a Saturday, so it can't be right).  I was not sent any documents that
would allow me to confirm Scottsborough's representation that all the loads
(which were allegedly shipped from 4/10-5/23/00) were purchased from MG
Metals, freight prepaid.

I am sending a follow-up letter to Scottsborough asking for specific
additional documentation, including the service papers; you will be
blind-copied on the letter.  I will also have Becky, my legal assistant, (a)
call the Court to see if process has been issued against ICTS and whether it
has been served and (b) check on Pacer, the federal bankruptcy database, to
see if ICTS has filed for bankruptcy.

Meanwhile, I wonder if Nicole could advise me of/send me the following:

1. a copy of the MG Metals/Scottsborough master agreement, if there is one,


Hi Eric,

Sorry but Dad can't make it Thursday night.  Would dinner here on Friday be o.k. with you?  Dad suggested games, etc., and I wanted to bake a birthday cake.  We can either order in or I would love to cook anything you would like.  It's up to you.  Let me know.

Have a great day.

Love, Mom


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 3:39 PM
To:	Richter, Brad; Bowen Jr., Raymond; Shankman, Jeffrey A.; Sherriff, John
Cc:	Webb, Jay; Palmer, Mark S. (ENW); Piper, Greg; Lavorato, John
Subject:	RE: EnronOnline Budgeting Method

We can't wait for another meeting - we are in front of the OOC on Monday with the Enron Americas plan.

Here's my numbers (I got them from etrade!!!!!):

0 - 5000 transactions per day		$  8:00/normal transaction (including internals)
> 5,000 transactions			$ 10:00/normal transaction
Options					$ 10:00/ per option (using option grid)
Take or Pay				Minumum Number of transactions per annum = 1,000,000
Service Interruption (outage)		Reduction in our bill of $100,000		(less than 30 minutes)
					Reduction in our bill of $500,000		(greater then 30 minutes)
Per product type set up 			0		(its in your interest as the number of transactions is high in ENA.  It think this issue is for other groups.)
On development 			0		(its in your interest - I think this again an issue for other groups.)

Now we all have the same incentive - grow the number of trades. I think this is pretty close for us.  Only paying once for a sleeve trade.

Let the games begin!

Louise

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Richter, Brad
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 3:09 PM
To:	Bowen Jr., Raymond; Kitchen, Louise; Shankman, Jeffrey A.; Sherriff, John
Cc:	Piper, Anthony; Webb, Jay; Palmer, Mark S. (ENW)
Subject:	EnronOnline Budgeting Method

As you each have heard over the past few days, EnronOnline is currently looking at a new methodology for charging the business units for services in 2002.  We intend to move away from an allocation mindset into one where services (in the form of products, transactions, and development) are charged on a usage basis, allowing the business units to scale and develop their markets in a more cost responsive way.  My assistant will be contacting your offices to schedule 30 minutes with each of you on Friday, Oct 19th to go over the proposed plan and discuss its impact on next year's budget.  I am confident that this process will yield a method that accurately reflects the cost of EnronOnline and allows each of you to make sound financial decisions about your plans to use EnronOnline in 2002.

Please don't hesitate to call me before Friday with questions, and I look forward to meeting with you.

Brad Richter


Since receiving your e:mail message last Monday on your needs in power, I
have spent three (!!!) full days in PRC meetings since then.  I have shared
your needs with both Todd Hall and Kristin Albrecht (my power business
controller here in Houston) and have gotten their thoughts on how we could be
of help.  Sorry that I keep missing your calls.  I will be meeting with
Fernley, but I will also try to reach you by phone tomorrow.


Also for #488526.01 and 488525.01 have the same issue with Delivery Point.

KA
---------------------- Forwarded by Kimberly Allen/HOU/ECT on 01/18/2001
03:36 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kimberly Allen                           01/18/2001 03:33 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: BPA

Kate, I have a couple of confirms I received from BPA with the following
info. I spoke with BPA and they said that their trader had talked to Sean
Crandall and agreed to Mid Columbia as the Delivery point, however in the
Enpower they have Northwest Delivered. Could you please check into:

#492613.01, 492612.01, 492611.01, 488524.01, 488523.01 These all say NW in
the system but BPA has Mid C on confirm

#491609.01 This trade has a trade date of 1/8/01. But on BPA's confirm they
have a trade date of 1/5/01. Could you ask Mike who did the trade which is
correct?

Thanks,

Kimberly


There is a new directory for the curve files.  I am trying to request access to this for the traders so they can't see the rest of our files.

This should be done soon.

Can you move your files to this drive today?


Yan,

The merged reports look great.  I believe the only orientation changes are to "unmerge" the following six reports:

31 Keystone Receipts
15 Questar Pipeline
40 Rockies Production
22 West_2
23 West_3
25 CIG_WIC

The orientation of the individual reports should be correct.  Thanks.

Mat

PS.  Just a reminder to add the "*" by the title of calculated points.


Reservation status has changed. Details of the reservation are listed below:
ASSIGNMENT_REF = 27971
SELLER_CODE = AZPS
SELLER_DUNS = 958982563
CUSTOMER_CODE = EPMI
CUSTOMER_DUNS = 848921276
AFFILIATE_FLAG = 0
PATH_NAME = W/AZPS/AZPS-AZPS/FOURCORNE345 - PNPKAPS230//
POINT_OF_RECEIPT = FOURCORNE345
POINT_OF_DELIVERY = PNPKAPS230
SOURCE = presched
SINK = presched
CAPACITY = 25
CAPACITY_REQUESTED = 25
SERVICE_INCREMENT = HOURLY
TS_CLASS = FIRM
TS_TYPE = POINT_TO_POINT
TS_PERIOD = OFF_PEAK
TS_WINDOW = FIXED
TS_SUBCLASS = WHEEL
NERC_CURTAILMENT_PRIORITY = Nerc Priority 1
OTHER_CURTAILMENT_PRIORITY = Default
START_TIME = 01/17/2002
STOP_TIME = 01/19/2002
CEILING_PRICE = 1.95
OFFER_PRICE = 1.95
BID_PRICE = 1.95
PRICE_UNITS = $/mW
PRECONFIRMED = YES
ANC_SVC_LINK = N/A
ANC_SVC_REQ = N/A
POSTING_REF = 0
SALE_REF =
REQUEST_REF =
DEAL_REF =
NEGOTIATED_PRICE_FLAG =
STATUS = CONFIRMED
STATUS_NOTIFICATION = holden.salisbury@enron.com
STATUS_COMMENTS =
TIME_QUEUED = 01/16/2002

TIME_OF_LAST_UPDATE = 01/16/2002
PRIMARY_PROVIDER_COMMENTS =
SELLER_COMMENTS =
CUSTOMER_COMMENTS =
SELLER_NAME = AZPS
SELLER_PHONE = 602.250.1128
SELLER_FAX = 602.250.1155
SELLER_EMAIL = oasisadm@apsc.com
CUSTOMER_NAME = Enron Power Marketing, Inc.
CUSTOMER_PHONE = (713)853-3801
CUSTOMER_FAX = (713)646-8272
CUSTOMER_EMAIL = bill.rust@enron.com
REASSIGNED_REF = 0
REASSIGNED_CAPACITY = 0


Thank you for your request. You will be notified by email when your request has been processed. You can check the progress of your request by clicking http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000082454&Page=MyReq.


Please find attached the last version of the referenced document. Thanks for
your help.

Regards,

Andrea


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 07/18/2001
07:15 AM ---------------------------
From: Jeff Dasovich on 07/17/2001 07:31 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich

To: skean@enron.com, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Harry
Kingerski/Enron@EnronXGate, Leslie Lawner/Enron@EnronXGate, Michael
Tribolet/ENRON@enronXgate, Kristin Walsh/Enron@EnronXGate, Karen
Denne/Enron@EnronXGate, mpalmer@enron.com, Janel Guerrero/Enron@EnronXGate,
Paul Kaufman/Enron@EnronXGate, Susan M Landwehr/Enron@EnronXGate, Linda
Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: California Update--0717.01

What people know:

Hertzberg (et al's) bill (82XX)was heard in an "informational" hearing today
and still sits in the Assembly Energy Committee.  It will be heard again
tomorrow (perhaps beginning at 10 AM) , at which time parties will have a
chance to support/oppose and ask for amendments.  Most, including us, oppose
unless significantly amended.
The Wright (D) -Richman (R) bill (83XX)was heard in an "informational"
hearing today and still sits in the Assembly Energy Committee.  It will be
heard again tomorrow, at which time parties will have a chance to
support/oppose and ask for amendments.  From our perspective, this is the
best bill out there yet, though it still has serious problems---it isn't
available electronically yet, but should be tomorrow, and I'll distribute
then.  The chances of the joint D-R bill being successful are slim, however,
since it's up against the Speakers competing bill.  There is talk that the
Speaker will try to negotiate with Wright/Richman tonight and include any
agreement in his bill (82XX).
The original version of the Governor's MOU bill sits in the Senate.  Most
believe that Burton will put it up for a vote this week and it will fail.
The Senate's version of the MOU (Sher-Peace-Kuehl) (78XX)came out today.  It
will likely be heard in the committee tomorrow or the next day.  Notably, it
kills Direct Access completely and makes Edison shareholders responsible for
that portion of Edison's debt owed to suppliers.  In short, a very bad bill.
Burton's 18XX, which would de-link the bond issuance (to pay back the General
Fund) from the DWR contracts is likely to pass the Senate tomorrow or the
next day.  Many--including Enron--support the bill (though we are supporting
it behind the scenes).

What people don't know:
Whether there's the time or the will in the Assembly and Senate to achieve by
Friday a single, comprehensive bill that can be sent to the governor for his
signature.
Whether the Legislature would postpone its month-long recess if the
Legislature hasn't finished a bill by Friday (most folks think they will not
postpone).
Whether it's true that, irrespective of the energy issue, the Legislature
will fail to get the budget completed by Friday and therefore have to
postpone their recess anyway, in which case they might continue to work on
the energy legislation at the same time.

Odds-makers still say it's better than 50-50 that the Legislature does not
get the Edison bills done by Friday and leaves on on its 30-day vacation.

Best,
Jeff

Sacramento is one goofy place.


Eddie Daniels, Senior Counsel, joined EWS Legal Department on December 7.
Eddie will report to Lance Schuler and will be located in EB3837A.  Please
stop by and welcome Eddie to the department.

Janette Elbertson
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department - EB3326
Telephone:  (713) 853-7906
Fax:  (713) 646-2600
janette.elbertson@enron.com


Thank you for changing lives.

Employee ID:  90009776
Name:  ROBERT C BENSON
Payment Amount:  240.00
Payment Method:  Deduct a portion from each paycheck
Leadership Giving Roster:  No
Make a Difference Club:  Not Applicable
Mailing Address:
5151 EDLOE UNIT 4304
HOUSTON , TX  77005
US
Your donation is designated for:  Developing children and youth to their
full potential
Written Acknowledgement of Contribution:  NO

	"You will find, as you look back on your life, that the moments that
stand out are
	the moments when you have done things for others."
		-Henry Drummond


Kevin,

Makes perfect sense.

Vince

Kevin Kindall@ENRON
01/08/2001 08:29 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Comment?

---------------------- Forwarded by Kevin Kindall/Corp/Enron on 01/08/2001
08:28 AM ---------------------------
From: Rick L Carson@ECT on 01/08/2001 08:21 AM
To: Kevin Kindall/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Weekly report

Kevin:  Since David Port has assumed responsibility for this project from a
RAC perspective, I recommend that you include David on the distribution.
Thanks!

                  Rick C.


Don't forget to chat with VNG about Nabisco.

VNG should have released 700 dth of CGAS capacity to Nabisco effective
11/1/2000 - 10/31/2001.  Nabisco was not set up as a prearranged bidder at
the time.  During Nov bidweek for Dec, Nabisco asked me to release the
capacity.  Since the term was less than 1 year, I couldn't release the
capacity non-biddable.  I spoke to Jeff Huston about it early last week and
he said he would get back to me.   Dick suggested I tell you.  TAGG - you're
it, I will await your command.  Mr. Scott Goodell said we could release the
capacity for 1 year eff 1/1/2001 and then recall Nov and Dec.


After you signed off, we set up another meeting---Fri the 13th at 11 am. Letr
me know if you can't make it.


So this is how it will work.  Whenever the payment is due (the 18th).  You
write me a check for $100.  I will pay the $1252.

You will pay me $100/ month for 13 months ( so you last payment will be made
to me on October 18th, 2001).
Payments will be due to me on the 18th of every month - NO EXCEPTIONS -  I
cannot do this deal if you do not pay me on time - I will not make any
exceptions for you.

Let me know if this is ok with you and I will work up a contract.

-Eric

"Bass, Jason" <Jason.Bass2@COMPAQ.com> on 09/07/2000 12:47:44 PM
To: "'Eric Bass'" <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: TV

$1252

Jason Bass
TSE
Compaq Computer Corporation

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Eric Bass [mailto:Eric.Bass@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 12:47 PM
To: Bass, Jason
Subject: TV

I need for you to find out how much the balance on your tv is - and let me
know


this deal is contingent on credit - he'll let me know later today whether or
not it's a good trade.

thanks,
Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
03/12/2001 09:00 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Missing deal?

sorry Friday, 3/9

   Kate Symes @ ECT                03/12/2001 10:52 AM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Missing deal?

what was the trade date on this?

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
03/12/2001 08:58 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Missing deal?

Prebon sent over a confirm for a deal where:
Enron (Mike Swerzbin) buys from PPL Montana Cal'04-Cal'06 25 mw of Mid-C at
$45.00 off-peak hours.

They did not tell me about this deal during checkout.  Can you please check
with Mike.

Thanks!!


Yes, I'll get to Mike Day.


Hi Katie,  How are you doing?  Did you survive all your projects and
presentations?  Haven't heard from you in a while and just wanted to see if
you made it through.  Hope everything is going OK.

Gerald


Wednesday, July 19

Hello alphaman_2001,

Welcome to Yahoo! Sports Fantasy Golf.

You have joined the private group called Big E and have entered
the team called E Force in that group.

If at any time, you would like to leave this group, simply go to
the group page and click on the Remove Myself From Group link.

Thanks for joining. See you on the green.

--Fantasy Golf Commissioner
http://golf.fantasysports.yahoo.com/golf


Let me know if you have any questions.


Some documents that Bowen & Co. did on CLEC v. IXC that may still be
pertinent.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 10/13/2000 01:38 PM -----

	"Camille Estes" <camille@technologylaw.com>
	08/23/2000 03:19 PM
	Please respond to camille

		 To: <jdasovic@enron.com>, <scott.bolton@enron.net>,
<tracy_cooper@enron.net>, <donald.lassere@enron.com>, <snord@enron.com>
		 cc: <anitatr@earthlink.net>, <stevebowen@earthlink.net>,
<jermeier@earthlink.net>
		 Subject: Overview of CLCs and NDIECs

All,

Please find attached a memo providing an overview of the rights and
responsibilities of CLCs and NDIECs in California.  Also attached are the
referenced California code sections and those Commission decisions for which
we have an electronic version.  Let us know if you have any questions.

Please note that Jeff does not have access to his email, so he has asked
that one of you forward this message to Lara Leibman.

Thank you
Camille Estes
Blumenfeld & Cohen

 - CA CLC NDIEC Memo final.doc
 - D.95-07-054.doc
 - D9512056.rtf
 - D98-08-031 consumer protection.RTF
 - Enron Code Sections.doc


Here it be.  Enjoyed talking with you.

Brent C. Bailey
Vice President and General Counsel
Duke Energy North America, LLC
5400 Westheimer Ct.
Houston, Texas 77056
Ph:  713-627-5307
Fax: 713-627-5550
E-mail:   bbailey@duke-energy.com


Leslie and Elizabeth:
I should have sent this to you as well.    Could you please take a look at
this form and let me know if it is okay with you?  Seems like there are more
situations that are coming up where our counterparties are wanted to execute
1 Guaranty to cover all types of transactions and this is our attempt to
develop a form that credit can use.   I look forward to hearing from you.
Carol
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 06/16/2000 04:13 PM -----

	Carol St Clair
	06/02/2000 06:24 PM

		 To: Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M
Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Mary Tudon/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Multi Purpose Form of Guaranty

Jeff, Stacy and Harry:
 We have developed a form of multi-product counterparty Guaranty that is a
little different from our old form of counterparty Guaranty.  The main
difference is the deletion of the 15 day cure period in Section 2.  Can you
please take a look at this and let me know if you are okay with this as
something credit can send to counterparties?
Thanks.
carol


How are you doing?  Anything exciting going on?  Not any news here, but we
wonder what you're doing.
Dad


FYI- Seabron, as most of you know, is a consultant for us... his thoughts on
FERC price cap order.
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 04/26/2001
03:14 PM ---------------------------

"Seabron Adamson" <seabron.adamson@frontier-economics.com> on 04/26/2001
02:41:45 PM
To: <Richard.Shapiro@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: What's ahead for California

Rick:

A thought I keep coming back to is that a lot of this has to do with bad
"market definition" - always the central problem in economic questions.
California has gotten itself in a pickle partially because they have always
looked at the market wrong - as California alone when it is really the West.
It is like looking at the market for new automobiles "West of the
Mississippi" - a pretty meaningless concept as cars are produced on either
side of that artificial boundary, and are freely bought and sold across it.
When you get the market definition wrong it is almost impossible to make
head or tails of any situation - which the Cal ISO and Gray Davis's office
have in fact failed to do.

The current proposal will generally fail - the market will just clear
outside California. It only acts as a form of price discrimination against
the California generators, who will then presumably sue for restraint of
interstate commerce. There is no way there are going voluntarily to agree to
be "Participating Generators" in the Cal ISO's scheme. So the entire market
will become "OOM".

I think if the leadership had not been so abysmal on this there could have
been a rational deal between the CA gov't and the generators that would have
solved the basic problem, kept the lights on and minimized the economic
damage to the California economy and the state's bond rating. But it hasn't
happened, and Moody's now ranks California debt at 49th of the 50 states,
only notch above Louisiana. This is going to cost California's citizens
billions for years to come in higher borrowing costs, even for the normal
expenditure of government such as highways and schools. Time for a timeout,
and to regroup. Even the old regulatory process at the CPUC wasn't this
bad...

Speak to you next week.

Seab

This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the
addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or
confidential information.  If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me at
(617) 354-0060 and permanently delete the original and any copy of any
e-mail and any printout thereof.

Seabron Adamson
Frontier Economics Inc
Two Brattle Square
Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
Ph:  (617) 354-0060
Fax: (617) 354-0640
seabron.adamson@frontier-economics.com

www.frontier-economics.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard.Shapiro@enron.com [mailto:Richard.Shapiro@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 3:22 PM
To: Seabron Adamson
Subject: Re: Sorry I missed your call

I agree- it's not clear to me whether Cal. squares off with the feds on the
RTO issue. All in all , a bad order that will only worsen the situation,
not improve things( I'm saying that w/o benefit of order which is'nt out
yet. Any thoughts?

"Seabron Adamson" <seabron.adamson@frontier-economics.com> on 04/26/2001
02:14:35 PM

To:   <Richard.Shapiro@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:  Sorry I missed your call

Rick:

Sorry I missed your call. I had just popped out for a coffee.

I'll just wait until next week before proceeding, after I get some comments
from you guys. I should pretty much be around all next week so you can
catch
me whenever.

I suppose you have been following the FERC California decision pretty
closely. How CA gets integrated into a new RTO appears to be the key
question. I would be surprised if RTO West even wants them in, given the
credit risk issues, etc.

Seab

This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the
addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or
confidential information.  If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly
prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me at
(617) 354-0060 and permanently delete the original and any copy of any
e-mail and any printout thereof.

Seabron Adamson
Frontier Economics Inc
Two Brattle Square
Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
Ph:  (617) 354-0060
Fax: (617) 354-0640
seabron.adamson@frontier-economics.com

www.frontier-economics.com


Shona,

Could you or someone in your group provide us with a summary of the last
month's issues? It would be helpful to see trends in order to to track
improvements. and to get an overall feel for where we should focus our
efforts.

If you agree, let's just plan to have the summary for next week's meeting
with Rick and Sally.

Thanks,

Debbie

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Shona Wilson @ ENRON                           12/07/2000 11:28 AM

To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R
Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen Stock/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Abel/HOU/ECT@ECT,
David Port/Market Risk/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, James
New/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: weekly log

Now that we have moved away from the daily problems to fixing procedures and
processes, I am no longer summarizing weekly info, but will continue to track
the daily problems and send these to you daily.  Let me know if you ever need
a summary and I will prepare one for you.

Thanks

Shona


Per your request, please see the attached.


A post id for the reports you requested is : 1032675.

Thanks,

Errol McLaughlin, X5-8274

From: Francis S Lim/ENRON@enronXgate on 02/01/2001 11:46 AM
To: John Griffith/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: report changes

can you supply us with a post_id for
The report  RSR0500 and RSR0503_CONS
so we may see how long it will take to do the changes
you requested.
Francis


yes

	Tim Belden
	02/21/2001 08:46 AM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Subpoena Requiring March 5 Response

are you on top of this?
---------------------- Forwarded by Tim Belden/HOU/ECT on 02/21/2001 05:47 AM
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Fuller, Don" <DFuller@caiso.com>@caiso.com>
02/20/2001 04:33 PM

Sent by: "Happ, Susan" <SHapp@caiso.com>
To: ISO Market Participants
<IMCEAEX-_O=CAISO_OU=CORPORATE_CN=DISTRIBUTION+20LISTS_CN=ISO+20MARKET+20PARTI
CIPANTS@caiso.com>
cc:
Subject: Subpoena Requiring March 5 Response

To Market Participants and Scheduling Coordinators:

The ISO received a subpoena requiring a response by March 5, from the
Plaintiff in People of the State of California vs Dynegy Power Marketing,
Inc., et al, a proceeding in the San Francisco Superior Court Civil
Division.  The subpoena is attached.  The ISO intends to seek a protective
order prior to disclosure of information subject to ISO tariff section
20.3.2.  Market participants wishing to take steps to seek protections for
confidential information in accordance with tariff section 20.3.4 should
directly contact Mr. Patrick J. Coughlin, attorney for the Plaintiff, at
415-288-4545 and notify Jeanne Sol, at jsole@caiso.com and Norma Formanek at
<mailto:nformanek@fbm.com> nformanek@fbm.com.
Jeanne M. Sol,
Regulatory Counsel
California ISO
(916) 608-7144
____________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________

The Foregoing e-Mail Communication (Together With Any Attachments Thereto)
Is Intended For The Designated Recipient(s) Only. Its Terms May Be
Confidential And Protected By Attorney/Client Privilege or Other Applicable
Privileges.  Unauthorized Use, Dissemination, Distribution, Or Reproduction
Of This Message Is Strictly Prohibited.

 - Deposition Subpoena (2).pdf


Here is change order #2 for Unit #1 for additional storage.  The change order
needs a little clean up work as some of the items from change order #1 have
not yet been removed.

Chris
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Booth/NA/Enron on 02/21/2001 11:51
AM ---------------------------

Matthew Tezyk@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
02/01/2001 09:56 AM
To: Fred Mitro@ECT
cc: Chris Booth@ENRON, Ben F Jacoby@ECT, Dan
Shultz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Fred L
Kelly/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Blue Dog Project, Change Order #2 Review

Mr. Mitro,

Please review the below change order for the long-term storage of Blue Dog
#1.  If there are any questions or comments, please feel free to contact me
at 6-8258.

Matthew Tezyk
---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Tezyk/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
02/01/2001 09:47 AM ---------------------------
From: Brian D Barto on 01/31/2001 07:08 PM
To: jeffrey.darst@ps.ge.com, Matthew
Tezyk/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@Enron_Development, Lisa Bills/Enron@EnronXGate,
Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott
Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt
cc:
Subject: Blue Dog Project, Change Order #2 Review

Jeff:  Please review and comment on the attached draft Change Order #2 for
storage of Unit #1.  This draft is being reviewed internally at the same time
to speed up the process and I reserve the right to address their comments in
subsequent redrafts.

Scott:  It is my assumption that you will review the Change Order for the
benefit of EECC legal review requirements.  Let me know if this is not the
case.


same thing with the Reliant energy lone liq from january - QI7044, this is
related to sitara #549377. there should be no liq. var.  shout with any
questions.
PL


Please send me $110 for dues by the week 3 games (9/17).  If I do not have
your money by this time you will forfeit games until I receive.

-the commish


Crude 24X7 WTI Marketing Effort

Trade Count:
 146  Trades
 6.96  Million Barrels
  5  Counterparties Transacting Today
 27 Counterparties Transacting to Date


-----Original Message-----
From: 	<vicki.l.meszaros@ca.pwcglobal.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+3Cvicki+2El+2Emeszaros+40ca+2Epwcglobal+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, May 29, 2001 10:54 AM
To:	gstorey@enron.com
Subject:	Tax Return Questions

Hi, Geoff,

I know that you are busy, so I will send you an e-mail instead of trying to
reach you by phone...

Just a few quick questions for you:

1.   Box 13, Code "C" for $36.00 on your W-2 - is this your donation to the
United Way?

2.  Please confirm that you donated $533 to the German Shephard Dog Rescue
and paid $533 at closing for real estate taxes.  I just want to make sure
that it is a coincidence that these amounts are the same, and not a typing
error.

3.  Please confirm that you paid $3,133.88 for your Tibco International
Inc. shares and sold at $2,905.09, and paid $9,355.00 for your Nasdaq
shares and sold at $7,459.75 (both sold at a loss).

Thank you kindly,

Vicki Meszaros

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Phone (403) 509-7469
Fax (403) 781-1825
----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.   If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any
computer.


The only thing I use Kim for is to take up a hem.  She really isn't a great
seamstress.  I also use that place on the corner of Greenbriar & Bissonnet,
Alter Alley, if I need a jacket or a drass taken in, or sleeves shortened.
Some people have told me they use that seamstress by the Hot Bagel shop and
said they have done a really good job, but I have personally never used
them.   I have an absolutely fabulous seamstress, she made my Barbie dress
for Holly's prom, and has made bed coverings and table skirts for Lucinda and
does a great job.  Her name is Ruth Erwin , she lives there right off
Bellaire Blvd, close to the fwy and her # is 667-9731.   She is an absolute
sweetheart.  I don't give her name out to a whole lot of people because I
don't want to get her too busy or too expensive (I'm so selfish!).  Only to
my select, special friends!