Lucy,

Here is a draft of a memo we should distribute to the units that are subject
to caps.  I wrote it as if it were from you.  It should come from the manager.

It is very important that we tell new tenants what the utility cap for there
unit is when they move in.  This needs to be written in on their lease.

When you have to talk to a tenant complaining about the overages emphasize
that it is only during the peak months and it is already warming up.

Have my Dad read the memo before you put it out.   You guys can make changes
if you need to.

Next week we need to take inventory of all air conditioners and
refrigerators.  We have to get this done next week.  I will email you a form
to use to record serial numbers.  The prospective buyers want this
information plus we need it for our records.  Something to look forward to.

It is 2 PM and I have to leave the office.  Please have my Dad call me with
the information about the units at home 713-463-8626.  He will know what I
mean.

Talk to you later,

Phillip


Thanks. We have been watching Navigator and saw these too. I am talking with
John Hodge also and may be back with you.


Mike,

This one is very good. I am afraid we shall
have a few employees left after this test.

Vince

	From:  Mike A Roberts                           03/14/2001 01:21 PM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: The QUIZ

Vince,

maybe we could use this to screen prospective new research group members!

- Mike
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT on 03/14/2001
01:14 PM ---------------------------
Kaye Davenport @ EES   03/14/2001 01:05 PM

To: Bruce N Stram/HOU/EES@EES, <mjacobson@fce.com>, Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: The QUIZ

Just checking you all out!!!
---------------------- Forwarded by Kaye Davenport/HOU/EES on 03/14/2001
01:04 PM ---------------------------

"Blair Hodges" <blair_hodges@hotmail.com> on 03/14/2001 12:29:51 PM
To: brhodes@downstreamenergy.com, mscandyd2001@msn.com,
Donna.Laird@Wilcom.com, GPhillips@dacg.com, mipopi@hotmail.com,
kdavenpo@enron.com, kwilliam@alogic.com, merry@tjtaxlaw.com,
wondershea@prodigy.net, mknbrd_2000@yahoo.com, theresa.viguerie@inteq.com,
hayatu@yahoo.com
cc:
Subject: The QUIZ

The following short quiz consists of 4 questions and tells whether you are
qualified to be a "professional". Scroll down for each answer. The questions
are not that difficult.

1.  How do you put a giraffe into a refrigerator?

The correct answer is: Open the refrigerator, put in the giraffe and close
the door. This question tests whether you tend to do simple things in an
overly complicated way.

2.  How do you put an elephant into a refrigerator?

Wrong answer: Open the refrigerator, put in the elephant and close the
refrigerator.

The correct answer is: Open the refrigerator, take out the giraffe,
put in the elephant and close the door. This tests your ability to
think through the repercussions of your actions.

3.  The Lion King is hosting an animal conference. All the animals
attend except one. Which animal does not attend?

The correct answer is: The Elephant. The Elephant is in the refrigerator.
This tests your memory. Okay, even if you did not answer the first three
questions correctly, you still have one more chance to show your abilities.

4.  There is a river you must cross, but it is inhabited by crocodiles. How
do you manage it?

The correct answer is: You swim across.  All the Crocodiles are attending
the Animal Meeting. This tests whether you learn quickly from your mistakes.
According to Andersen Consulting Worldwide, around 90% of the professionals
they tested got all 4 questions wrong. But many preschoolers got several
correct answers. Anderson Consulting says this conclusively disproves the
theory that most professionals have the brains of a four year old.

Send this out to frustrate all of your friends

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


where do yo get tickets for prague.  i need to get two.  i am gonna stay in
town.  we are heading to champs for the game if you want to go.


are they sweets of any kind?


----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 07/13/2000 01:22 PM -----

	Suzanne Adams
	07/13/2000 10:14 AM

		 To: ric.doherty@compaq.com, Julia Murray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila
Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristina Mordaunt/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janette
Elbertson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: New Addition to St. Clair Household

Carol had the baby at 10:15 p.m. last night.  Charles Eugene St. Clair
weighed 8lbs 8 ounces.

Carol is in Methodist Hospital, Room 633
6565 Fannin
Houston, TX
Phone Number is 713-790-3867


I have no such studies.

From: Ann Ballard/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/21/2001 07:27 PM
To: Jessica Uhl/ENRON@enronXgate, Mitchell Taylor/ENRON@enronXgate, TJ
Rylander/ENRON@enronXgate, Rod Hayslett/ENRON@enronXgate, Larry
Lawyer/ENRON@enronXgate, James C Lewis/ENRON@enronXgate, Shelia
Benke/ENRON@enronXgate, Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael A
Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, James
Prentice/ENRON@enronXgate, John L Nowlan/ENRON@enronXgate, Scott
Earnest/ENRON@enronXgate
cc: Cindy Stark/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Project Timber

I am preparing the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act filing for Enron Corp. in connection
with the sale of the MTBE/Isomerization facility to EOTT Energy Partners,
L.P.  I believe that the filing should be made by this Friday, May 25 in
order to be sure that the 30 day waiting period will expire before the
anticipated closing date of June 29.  Please read the attached memo which
requests that each of you look through your files to determine whether or not
you possess the types of documents described in the memo.  I would be happy
to discuss any questions that you may have regarding whether or not
particular documents in your files would be responsive to this request.
Since Enron needs to make this filing by Friday, it is important that you
respond to the memo by Thursday, May 24.


Jeff,

That is good news about Leander.

Now for the stage.  I would like to get it sold by the end of March.   I have
about $225K invested in the stagecoach,
 it looks like I need to get around $745K to breakeven.

I don't need the cash out right now so if I could get a personal guarantee
and Jaques Craig can
work out the partnership transfer, I would definitely be willing to carry a
second lien.  I understand second liens are going for 10%-12%.
Checkout this spreadsheet.

These numbers should get the place sold in the next fifteen minutes.
However,  I am very concerned about the way it is being shown.  Having Lucy
show it is not a good idea.  I need you to meet the buyers and take some
trips over to get more familar with the property.  My dad doesn't have the
time and I don't trust
Lucy or Wade to show it correctly.  I would prefer for you to show it from
now on.

I will have the operating statements complete through December by this
Friday.

Phillip


Here is the editted version of the amendment.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Thorne, Judy
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 8:58 AM
To:	Perlingiere, Debra
Cc:	Zivley, Jill T.; Nemec, Gerald
Subject:	FW: Aspect Amendment
Importance:	High

Debra,

Jill is ready to finalize the Aspect Amendment and send it to them today to sign.  I have editted the amendment that you provided to include the new pricing as well as the Keep Whole language.

Please review the revised pricing section and advise if we can remove the "DRAFT" from the amendment and send it to the customer(s) to sign.

Thanks,
Judy

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Perlingiere, Debra
Sent:	Monday, September 17, 2001 4:55 PM
To:	Thorne, Judy
Subject:	Aspect Amendment

 Judy attached is the Aspect Amendment as discussed.   The  first paragraph has been revised to reflect the assignment to ENA.   Article 2. now states term dates.  Concerning Articles 3.1 and 3.3, Gerald would not agree to "one sentence". Finally, I  included a provision regarding changes to working interest (see # 9), and incorporated meter number on Schedule I.  Please let me know if you have any other questions and or changes.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Legal
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron
713-853-7658
713-646-3490 Fax


Mark:

Because you are a registered CLEonline.com user, we would like to provide
you with the following update about our online CLE seminars for
June, as well as other notes of interest:

*  June Seminar Listing

*  New this month:  --> NBI presents "How to Litigate Your First Civil
Trial in Texas" (Parts 1 and 2)  [3.0 each]

--> NBI presents "Premises Liability: Preparation
and Trial of a Difficult Case in Texas
(Parts 1 and 2)  [2.0 each]

--> Government Lawyer Ethics: Conflicts,
Confidentiality, and... Common Sense?
[3.0 ETHICS]

--> Wills, Estates, and Trusts: Case Law
Developments in Texas - 2001  [1.0]

*********************************************************************

The following is a complete listing of all of our online CLE seminars
that will be taking place on our Web site (www.CLEonline.com) during the
month of June.  We would ask that you please share this list with
your colleagues and associates who may be interested in one or more of
our online CLE seminars for this month.

1.  Additional Ethical Issues Facing In-House Counsel [3.0 ETHICS]
2.  Anticipating Will Contests and How to Avoid Them  [3.0]
3.  Appearing Before the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles - or - 'How
to Deal with a Three-Headed Monster' - together with HBA (Video
Included)  [1.5]
4.  Avoiding Malpractice Claims: Things to Do (and NOT Do) on the First
Day You Represent a Client [1.0 ETHICS]
5.  Confidentiality and Privileges in Electronic Communications [3.0
ETHICS (Audio included)]
6.  Consumer Bankruptcy Law: Nuts & Bolts for the Non-Specialist [1.0]
7.  Corporate Counsel Wrongful Discharge Claims: Ethics, Policy and
Practice [1.0 ETHICS]
8.  Damages in Texas Insurance Litigation: Evaluating, Pleading, and
Proving  [1.0]
9.  Disqualification and Conflicts of Interest in IP Practice - with CCE
(Audio included) [2.0 ETHICS]
10. Dissecting the Web / E-Commerce Environment and Analyzing the Legal
Issues  [1.0]
11. Effective Negotiation and Mediation Advocacy  [3.0]
12. Elimination of Bias in the Legal Profession [1.0 ETHICS]
13. Engagement Letters for Texas Litigators: Forms, Issues, and Analysis
[2.5 ETHICS]
14. Estate Planning Clients With Special Circumstances -- Those with
Minor Children and Those with Communication Challenges  [1.0]
15. Estate Planning Practicum -- Suggestions for Interviewing Clients and
Helping Them Select Fiduciaries  [1.0]
16. Estate Planning for Clients With Special Circumstances -- Lottery
Players/Winners and Pet Owners  [1.0]
17. Ethical Considerations in Estate Planning for Spouses [1.0 ETHICS]
18. Ethical Considerations in Mass Tort and Class Action Litigation in
Texas [1.0 ETHICS]
19. Ethical Issues Arising From Using Experts in Litigation [1.0 ETHICS]
20. Ethical Issues and the Associate -- Or -- And You Thought Law School
was Bad! [2.0 ETHICS]
21. Ethical Pot-Holes on the Information Highway and How to Avoid Them
[1.0 ETHICS]
22. Ethical Risks and Responsibilities of Attorneys and Firms Prosecuting
Patents for Different Clients in Related Technologies [1.0 ETHICS]
23. Family Law Update: What You Don't Know CAN Hurt You
[Video included] [1.0]
24. Government Lawyer Ethics: Conflicts, Confidentiality, and... Common
Sense? [3.0 ETHICS]
25. How to Collect Child Support in Texas  [3.0]
26. ICANN / WIPO Domain Name Disputes: Procedures And Analysis   [1.0]
27. IP Litigation Issues: Trade Secrets, Patents, Copyrights and
Trademarks  [3.0]
28. Identity Theft -- Strategies for the Information Age - together with
HBA (Video Included)  [1.5]
29. Improve Your Legal Writing: Ten Plain-Language Tips  [1.0]
30. Internet Legal Issues - together with CCE [Video]   [1.5]
31. Law Practice Management: How to Enhance Your Clients' Interests when
Dealing with the Media [Audio]  [1.0]
32. Legal Ethics for Corporate and In-house Counsel [3.0 ETHICS (Audio
included)]
33. Legal Writing: Meet the New Citation Manual  [1.0]
34. Legal Writing: Ten Tips for Better Letters  [1.0]
35. Legal Writing: Eight Tips for Successful Motions  [1.0]
36. Legal Writing: Eleven Tips for Formal Agreements  [1.0]
37. Litigating the Link Between Cellular Phones and Cancer  [2.0]
38. Living Trusts . Making a Wise Decision [1.0]
39. Malpractice Avoidance for Probate Lawyers: Common Non-Tax Estate
Planning Errors [1.0 ETHICS]
40. More Selected Ethical Issues Facing Texas Litigators [1.0 ETHICS]
41. NBI Presents "Practical Legal Ethics in Florida: Issues and Answers"
[3.5 ETHICS, Audio included]
42. NBI Presents "Superior Deposition Strategies in Florida Civil Trial
Practice" [Audio included]  [7.0/1.0]
43. NBI presents "How to Litigate Your First Civil Trial in Texas - Part
1 (Plaintiff's Perspective)"  [3.0/0.25]
44. NBI presents "How to Litigate Your First Civil Trial in Texas - Part
2 (Defendant's Perspective)" [3.0/0.25]
45. NBI presents "Premises Liability: Preparation and Trial of a
Difficult Case in Texas - Part 1"  [2.0/0.0]
46. NBI presents "Premises Liability: Preparation and Trial of a
Difficult Case in Texas - Part 2"  [2.0/0.50]
47. New Twists on the Traditional Intellectual Property Enforcement
Paradigm - with CCE (Audio included)  [1.0]
48. Nobody's Bulletproof: Legal Ethics and Legal Malpractice Issues [3.0
ETHICS (Audio included)]
49. Offshore Trusts: Uses for Asset Protection Purposes  [3.0]
50. Operator & Royalty Issues in a New Century - Part 1 -- with Live Oak
CLE (Audio included)  [3.0]
51. Operator & Royalty Issues in a New Century - Part 2 -- with Live Oak
CLE (Audio included) [3.0/0.75 ETHICS]
52. Presuit Discovery and Discovery from Nonparties in Texas Litigation
[1.0]
53. Privacy Issues in the Workplace: Internet Porn, E-mail, Chat Rooms
and more  [2.0]
54. Professionalism in Corporate Litigation: From Discovery Through
Appeal [3.0 ETHICS]
55. Punitive Damages: Preparing Plaintiff's and Defendant's Case for the
Punitive Damage Phase  [3.0]
56. Selected Ethical Issues in Intellectual Property Licensing [1.0
ETHICS]
57. Selected Issues in Ethics for California Lawyers [2.0 ETHICS]
58. Selected Issues in Ethics for Texas Lawyers [3.0 ETHICS]
59. Substance Abuse and Depression: An Overview for Lawyers [1.0 ETHICS]
60. Summary of Texas Legal Malpractice Law [1.0 ETHICS (Video included)]
61. Texas Law of Eminent Domain  [3.0]
62. Texas Legal Ethics and Malpractice - together with HBA (Video
Included) [3.0 ETHICS]
63. Texas Real Estate Law - Recent Case Update  [3.0]
64. The "Write" Stuff: Grammar, Proofreading & Spelling (For Legal
Assistants and Legal Secretaries Only)
65. The ABC's of Appellate Practice for California Litigators  [1.0]
66. The Complete Internet Seminar for Lawyers  [3.0]
67. The Mobile Lawyer: A Roadmap for Beginners - with CCE (Audio
included)  [1.0]
68. The New World of Electronic Commerce: Business to Business (B2B)
[Audio included]   [1.0]
69. The Organizational Client: Attorney-Client Privilege and the
No-Contact Rule [3.0 ETHICS]
70. The Rewards of Decency [2.0 ETHICS (Audio Included)]
71. The Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act: (UCITA): An
Introduction and Exploration of its Impact on Contracting Practices
- with CCE (Audio included)  [1.5]
72. Wills, Estates, and Trusts: Case Law Developments in Texas - 2000
[2.0]
73. Wills, Estates, and Trusts: Case Law Developments in Texas - 2001
[1.0]

For more details on any of these seminars, please drop by our site:

http://www.CLEonline.com

You can easily register online for any of these seminars at any time of
day or night using our secure online registration system.  All of these
seminars are available through the last day of this month.

*********************************************************************

NEW SEMINARS FOR THIS MONTH...

The following are brief descriptions of our new seminars for this month.
Full details on each are available on our Web site:

--> NBI presents "How to Litigate Your First Civil Trial in Texas"
(Parts 1 and 2)  [3.0 each]

This is another in our series of NBI seminars being offered on our site,
and this one is a very practical seminar for Texas attorneys.  This
seminar will provide information on planning and preparing for trial by
selecting a case theme and creating a written action plan. The seminar is
provided in two parts-- Part 1 will focus on the plaintiff's perspective
and Part 2 will focus on that of representing the defendant.  Each part
is accredited for 3.0 hours of CLE, including .25 hour in ethics.

--> NBI presents "Premises Liability: Preparation and Trial of a
Difficult Case in Texas   (Parts 1 and 2)  [2.0 each]

Also from NBI this month, we are pleased to present this timely seminar
on premises liability law for Texas lawyers.  In this seminar, you'll
receive an overview of premises liability law from both the plaintiff and
defense perspectives and come away with a better understanding of using
standards and codes. The seminar is provided in two parts, with each part
accredited for 2.0 hours of CLE (Part 2 includes .50 hour in ethics.)

--> Government Lawyer Ethics: Conflicts, Confidentiality, and... Common
Sense? [3.0 ETHICS]

David Hricik of Austin has produced another new legal ethics seminar that
is specifically designed for government attorneys.  This seminar will
explore a variety of ethical and conflicts issues that would affect
lawyers employed by governmental entities.  This seminar is accredited
for 3.0 hours of CLE credit, all in the area of legal ethics.

--> Wills, Estates, and Trusts: Case Law Developments in Texas - 2001
[1.0]

Another of our popular faculty contributors, Prof. Gerry Beyer, has
developed this new online seminar to keep Texas estate planning attorneys
up to date on the latest case law developments.  This seminar is designed
to discuss the judicial developments during the year 2001 that relate to
the Texas law of intestacy, wills, estate administration, trusts, and
other estate planning issues.  This seminar is accredited for 1.0 hour of
CLE credit (no ethics.)

*********************************************************************

Thanks again for your continued interest in and support of CLEonline.com.
We greatly value you as a registered user of our service, and we would
very much appreciate it if you could please spread the word about our
award-winning CLE site to other attorneys in your firm, company or local
area.

Best Regards,

Mike De La Rosa, Esq.

_______

Michael De La Rosa, CEO          ------------------------------------
Voice: (512) 310-9618
FAX:   (512) 310-1720                     CLEonline.com
P.O. Box 1897
Round Rock, TX 78680-1897       ...delivering CLE to YOUR desktop!
mdelarosa@CLEonline.com
http://www.CLEonline.com         ------------------------------------


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [Fwd: Tax Cut]
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2001 12:54:00 -0400
From: George Taylor <Beau.Taylor@morganstanley.com>
Reply-To: Beau.Taylor@morganstanley.com
Organization: Morgan Stanley
To: Joseph Delaney III <Joseph.Delaney@morganstanley.com>,"Sean O'Neal"
<Sean.O'Neal@morganstanley.com>,Lewis Nash
<Lewis.Nash@morganstanley.com>

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Tax Cut
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 10:29:22 -0400
From: Joseph Delaney <Joseph.Delaney@morganstanley.com>
Reply-To: Joseph.Delaney@morganstanley.com
Organization: Morgan Stanley
To: "Sean O'Neal" <Sean.O'Neal@morganstanley.com>,George Taylor
<Beau.Taylor@morganstanley.com>,Thomas Funk
<Thomas.Funk@morganstanley.com>,Charles Durkin III
<Chas.Durkin@morganstanley.com>,"Catherine.Flax@msdw.com"
<Catherine.Flax@msdw.com>,John Woodley <John.Woodley@morganstanley.com>

Subject: Tax Cut

 If you think the Bush tax cut plan is unfair, read this rebuttal to the

 Daschle-Gephardt Muffler/Lexus attack that appeared in the Sunday,
March 4

 Chicago Tribune. By the way, the ratios are roughly accurate. 10% of
the
 tax payers pay about 60% of the taxes collected; 30% pay about 35%; and

 20% pay about 4%.

 A TAX CUT PARABLE

 Every night, 10 men met at a restaurant for dinner. At the end of the
 meal, the bill would arrive. They owed $100 for the food that they
shared. Every
 night they lined up in the same order at the cash register.

 The first four men paid nothing at all.
 The fifth, grumbling about the unfairness of the situation, paid $1.

 The sixth man, feeling very generous, paid $3.
 The next three men paid $7, $12 and $18, respectively.

 The last man was required to pay the remaining balance, $59. He
realized
 that he was forced to pay for not only his own meal but the unpaid
balance
 left by the first five men.

 The 10 men were quite settled into their routine when the restaurant
threw
 them into chaos by announcing that it was cutting its prices. Now
dinner
 for the 10 men would only cost $80.

 This clearly would not affect the first four men. They still ate for
free.

 The fifth and sixth men both claimed their piece of the $20 reduction
 right  away.

 The fifth decided to forgo his $1contribution.

 The sixth pitched in $2.

 The seventh man deducted $2 from his usual payment and paid $5.

 The eighth man paid $9.

 The ninth man paid $12, leaving the last man with a bill of $52.

 Outside of the restaurant, the men began to compare their savings, and
 angry outbursts began to erupt. The sixth man yelled, "I only got $1
out of the
 $20, and he got $7," pointing at the last man.

 The fifth man joined in. "Yeah! I only got $1 too. It is unfair that he

 got seven times more than me."

 The seventh man cried, "Why should he get $7 back when I only got $2?"

 The nine men formed an outraged mob, surrounding the 10th man. The
first
 four men followed the lead of the others: "We didn't get any of the
$20.
 Where is our share?"

 The nine angry men carried the 10th man up to the top of a hill and
 lynched him.

 The next night, the nine remaining men met at the restaurant for
dinner.
 But when the bill came, there was no one to pay it.


I was re-reading my previous e-mail back to you, and saw my typo!  (you know that's one of my pet peeves)---Well anyway, I'm pleased, I know he's not perfect, and I'm sure he will get on "our nerves" from time to time, but if we grow and learn something from him, and he helps us to reach our full potential as a choir, and we're actually proud of ourselves again, it'll work!!!!  Let's try to convince Robin to think in a positive light!  We've got much greater concerns right now!

Love ya!

P.S. I have a much needed hair appointment tonight, so I won't be home until real late, but I'll have my cell phone available.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nytasha.Sims@dynegy.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Nytasha+2ESims+40dynegy+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, September 26, 2001 3:29 PM
To:	Mims, Patrice L.
Subject:	RE: Guess What!

Well, Robin isn't pleased at all.  She thinks that he's extremely rude and
arrogant.  I have mixed emotions.  I enjoyed most of his songs, but I won't
like his style all the time.  There has to be a mix.

                    Patrice.L.Mims
                    @enron.com            To:     IMCEANOTES-Nytasha+2ESims+40dynegy+2Ecom+40ENRON@enron.com
                                          cc:
                    09/26/01 02:14        Subject:     RE: Guess What!
                    PM

Get our of here!!!!

That's so exciting, did they kick Dorian to the curb!  I like the
professionalism that the choir with achieve under Mike.  I'm excited!  How
do you feel about it,  how did Robin feel?  I know we'll be jamming!.  I
just hope we don't have to sing too many V. Michael McKay originals
alllllllllll the time!

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   Nytasha.Sims@dynegy.com@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Nytasha+2ESims+40dynegy+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]

   Sent:   Wednesday, September 26, 2001 11:37 AM
   To:     Mims, Patrice L.
   Subject:  Guess What!

   I called you last night with Robin, to tell you the stunning news.
   Effective next week, V. Michael McKay will be over us.  He is going to
   take
   us to the next level!  Can you believe this?  What are your thoughts?

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Will you come get me?
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


Does this impact our discussion of yesterday? By the way, Richard Sanders was very helpful in helping me deal with this. Rick

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Williams, Robert C.
Sent:	Friday, November 16, 2001 11:10 AM
To:	Horton, Stanley; Causey, Richard; Buy, Rick; Frevert, Mark
Cc:	Walls Jr., Rob; Derrick Jr., James
Subject:	Securities Litigation

As you may have become aware, the company received notice yesterday that you have been named as defendants (along with Enron Corp., Ken Lay, Jeff Skilling, Andy Fastow, and Arthur Andersen) in one of the federal securities class actions.  I will forward to you a copy of the Complaint.  We are in the process of determining who would be the most effective counsel for you.  If you wish to have separate representation, please let me know.  I cannot guarantee that the D&O carrier will reimburse you for the cost of separate counsel.

I am setting up a meeting with counsel for Enron Corp., Susman & Godfrey, to discuss this litigation with you as soon as possible.  Please do not hesitate to call me with any questions.

Thank you.


Attached is a rough draft of the O&M Agreement


Sorry, the pipeline in question is the Bammel 30-inch line, which goes from
the Katy-Satsuma line to Bammel.
---------------------- Forwarded by Tom Shelton/HOU/ECT on 11/20/2000 02:43
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Tom Shelton                           11/20/2000 11:29 AM

To: Merlin Moseman/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nathan L
Hlavaty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jack Simunek/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Steve HPL Schneider/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Katy-Satsuma Form T-4

 I have learned that although HPL Compression Company owns the "Katy-Satsuma"
line, for reasons related to the Looper Trust deal there must be a
non-affiliated thrid party operator.  As part of the deal, operating
responsibility was contracted out to Hanover Compression Company, but since
they do not really have any pipeline operating people they then subcontracted
the operatorship out to a Reliant company, the exact name of which I do not
know.
 Merlin Moseman said that during a recent Railroad Commission field audit
there was, not surprisingly, some confusion about who is the operator of this
line.  The T-4 currently on file at the RRC shows HPL as the operator (under
HPL's P-5 number), and HPL Compression as the owner.  From what I now know,
it sounds  like the Reliant company should file a T-4 showing them as the
operator of the line, although I am not sure exactly what they are doing in
that role.  Such a change may well foster questions, both among the parties
as well as with the RRC, about other matters, such as responsibility for
safety, signage, reporting, emergency procedures, etc.
 I, in the role of facilitator/meddler, will set up a meeting for late next
week to discuss this matter, unless someone else wants to throw out the first
pitch.


[IMAGE]
 Anna Kournikova Exclusive Fantasy Offer!  Save 10% on Anna's 2002 Calendar! Yes 12 months of Anna!  Simply enter the coupon code FNTSYCAL in step 5 of the checkout process to receive your discount.  Offer expires 11/30/01.  http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/135/sffer1120tr.cgi   Attention Fantasy Fans!  Subscribe to The Sporting News  now and get 4 FREE issues! Hurry!   Brought to you by   Sponsorship Bar You are receiving these e-reports because you have signed up for CBS SportsLine.com Fantasy Football.  To customize, reschedule, or turn off these reports please  click here    NFL Reports, Player Updates  [IMAGE]Latest NFL Player News  Keenan McCardell , WR JAC - 2700 HUEVOS Updated 11/25/01 McCardell caught six passes for 80 yards against Baltimore. He has certainly raised the level of his play in recent weeks, and should be a solid Fantasy player down the stretch as opponents continue to focus on Jimmy Smith.  Stacey Mack , RB JAC - Xtreme Updated 11/25/01 Mack rushed for 50 yards and two TDs and caught five passes for 45 yards against the Ravens. Despite his good outing, Mack remains a Fantasy ri! sk! because of his inconsistency.   Qadry Ismail , WR BAL - She Said Updated 11/25/01 The Jaguars held Ismail to three catches for 44 yards. Despite his quiet statistical performance, Ismail remains a must-start player for any Fantasy team. He is one of the most complete and underrated receivers in the AFC.  Jason Brookins , RB BAL - The Wounded Ducks Updated 11/25/01 Brookins rushed for 82 yards and two TDs at Jacksonville, but also lost a fumble. The rookie RB is talented, but too erratic to be a Fantasy starter on most teams right no! w.!   Ron Dayne , RB NYG - Cali Bound Updated 11/25/01 Dayne carried the ball six times for 26 yards against Oakland. Don't depend on him for good numbers during the remainder of the season.  Tiki Barber , RB NYG - Pierres Flea Circus Updated 11/25/01 Barber rushed for 124 yards and a TD against Oakland, and caught five passes for 41 yards. He has played well recently, although his owners would still like to see him score on a more consistent basis.  LaDainian Tomlinson , RB SD - The Hillrods Updated 11/25/01 Tomlinson was held out of the end zone, but he had a good day against Arizona nonetheless. The rookie tailback had 145 scrimmage yards, including 13 receptions, in San Diego's 20-17 loss.   Doug Flutie , QB SD - The Hillrods Updated 11/25/01 Flutie had a solid game, throwing for 308 yards and two touchdowns against Arizona. However, he's only worth starting when the matchup is to his advantage.   Jake Plummer , QB ARI - She ! Sa! id Updated 11/25/01 Plummer had a decent outing on Sunday, posting 241 yards and a touchdown against San Diego. Plummer, who also threw two picks, is only a reserve Fantasy quarterback at best.   David Boston , WR ARI - The Hillrods Updated 11/25/01 Boston had another outstanding game, catching six passes for 121 yards and a touchdown against San Diego. He's one of the most reliable Fantasy receivers in the league, and is worth starting on a weekly basis.   Willie Jackson , WR NO - Third World Countryman Updated 11/25/01 Jackson had a good outing against New England, catching five catches for 78 yards and a touchdown. He may not be the most dependable Fantasy receiver, but he is worth starting in deeper leagues.   Joe Horn , WR NO - The Leather Cheerios Updated 11/25/01 Horn had another solid outing, catching four passes for 97 yards against New England. He's been a very dependable receiver in recent weeks and is worth starting on a weekly basis.  Tyrone Wheatley , RB OAK - Xtreme Updated 11/25/01 In his return from a knee injury, Wheatley carried the ball five times for 17 yards. Zack Crockett was used more often in short-yardage packages, and Wheatley does not appear capable of starting for any Fantasy team in the near future. Even when he is fully healthy, he may not be able to take many carries away from Charlie Garner.  Antowain Smith , RB NE - She Said Updated 11/25/01 Smith had 153 yards of total offense and two touchdowns against New Orleans. After a slow start, Smith has become a pretty good weekly option for Fantasy Footballers  Tom Brady , QB NE - Baby Blues Updated 1! 1/! 25/01 Brady put up huge numbers against New Orleans, posting 258 yards passing and four touchdowns. He's become a pretty reliable Fantasy player, and his performance will likely keep Drew Bledsoe on the Patriots' bench for another week.  Rich Gannon , QB OAK - Pierres Flea Circus Updated 11/25/01 Gannon threw for 221 yards, three TDs and no interceptions against the Giants. He ignored rain-soaked conditions, and continued to look like the most reliable QB in Fantasy Football.  Frank Sanders , WR ARI - 2700 HUEVOS Updated 11/25/01Sanders left Sunday's game against San Diego after re-aggravating a hamstring injury. He was replaced by MarTay Jenkins, and did not return to the game.  Eric Moulds , WR BUF - 2700 HUEVOS Updated 11/25/01 Moulds finally emerged from an extended slump, catching six passes for 196 yards and two TDs against Miami. He also lost a fumble, and Fantasy owners should still remember that Moulds has been a disappointment for most of the year. Don't be surprised if he follows his best outing of the year with a mediocre performance.  Alex Van Pelt , QB BUF - Free Agent! Updated 11/25/01 Van Pelt had another fine game, throwing for 309 yards, three TDs and one interception. He is definitely merits strong Fantasy consideration as long as he remains in Buffalo's starting lineup.  Oronde Gadsden , WR MIA - She Said Updated 11/25/01 Gadsden caught eight passes for 118 yards at Buffalo. He did not catch a TD pass, though, and lost a fumble. Gadsden is too unreliable to start for most Fantasy teams in these important final weeks.  Jay Fiedler , QB MIA - The Wounded Ducks Updated 11/25/01Fiedler threw for 262 yards, three TDs and no interceptions at Buffalo. His performance may have quieted talk of a QB controversy, but Fiedler is still too inconsistent to be a dependable Fantasy QB.  Donovan McNabb , QB PHI - 2700 HUEVOS Updated 11/25/01 The Redskins held McNabb to 92 passing yards and 39 rushing yards, with no TDs or interceptions. Expect the Philadelphia QB to rebound quickly from such a quiet performance.  James Thrash , WR PHI - Pumpdog Updated 11/25/01 Thrash caught fo! ur! passes for 32 yards against Washington. He is too inconsistent to be a starter on better Fantasy teams as the playoffs approach.   Rod Gardner , WR WAS - Baby Blues Updated 11/25/01 Gardner caught four passes for only 33 yards on Sunday. The rookie has slowed down considerably in the past few weeks, and now seems like a risk during the Fantasy homestretch.   Ki-Jana Carter , RB WAS - Free Agent Updated 11/25/01 Carter saw extensive action on Sunday as Stephen Davis played through back problems. He carried 18 times for 56 yards, and is a good backup to have if Davis in on your Fantasy team. Davis has always been known to battle minor injuries.  Isaac Byrd , WR CAR - Free Agent Updated 11/25/01 Byrd started in place of the injured Muhsin Muhammad on Sunday. He posted decent Fantasy numbers in Muhammad's absence, catching five passes for 69 yards in Carolina's 10-7 loss to Atlanta.   Muhsin Muhammad , WR CAR - KMB Express Updated 11/25/01 Muhamm! ad! missed Sunday's game against Atlanta due to a shoulder injury. His status for next weekend's game against New Orleans is unknown at this time.   Derrick Alexander , WR KC - She Said Updated 11/25/01 Alexander caught two passes for 56 yards in his return from a rib injury. He was not open often, and Alexander may continue to be a Fantasy disappointment if he stays healthy.  Chris Chandler , QB ATL - The Wounded Ducks Updated 11/25/01 Chandler had a subpar game on Sunday, throwing for only 132 yards against Carolina. The Falcons chose to attack Carolina with their ground game, which was the reason for Chandler's poor Fantasy numbers.   Derrick Alexander , WR KC - She Said Updated 11/25/01 Alexander caught two passes for 56 yards in his return from a rib injury. He was not open often, and Alexander may continue to be a Fantasy disappointment if he stays healthy.  More Updates  Transactions, View! &n! bsp; [IMAGE]     [IMAGE] Make Selection   [IMAGE]       [IMAGE] There are no League Transactions which meet the selected criteria.  To see all league transactions select "All", "All", "All Teams" from the Transactions, View page.      Schedule, Breakdown  [IMAGE] Baby Blues Player Pos Points Brady, Tom  QB 41.0 Faulk, Marshall  RB 0.0 Green, Ahman  RB 34.0 Johnson, Keyshawn  WR 0.0 McKnight, James  WR 0.0 Schroeder, Bill  WR 0.0 Moore, Dave  TE 0.0 Brown, Kris  K 10.0 Colts  DT 8.0   [IMAGE] TOTAL   93.0   [IMAGE] Chiefs  DT 6.0 Brunell, Mark  QB 17.0 Coles, Laveranues  WR 0.0 Gardner, Rod  WR 0.0 Garner, Charlie  RB 15.0 Hanson, Jason  K 14.0 Huntley, Richard  RB 0.0 Kinney, Erron  TE 0.0   [IMAGE] at KMB Express Player Pos Points Manning, Peyton  QB 17.0 Dillon, Corey  RB 0.0 Staley, Duce  RB 0.0 Hilliard, Ike  WR 0.0 Mason, Derrick  WR 12.0 Muhammad, Muhsin  WR 0.0 Sharpe, Shannon  TE 6.0 Nedney, Joe  K 8.0 Raiders  DT 6.0   [IMAGE] TOTAL   49.0   [IMAGE] Redmond, J.R.  RB 0.0 Jets  DT 0.0 Alexander, Stephen  TE 0.0 Graham, Jeff  WR 17.0 Henry, Travis  RB 14.0 Kasay, John  K 1.0 Stokes, J.J.  WR 6.0 Weinke, Chris  QB 11.0   [IMAGE]  Copyright 2001 Commissioner.COM Inc and SportsLine.com Inc. Your site can be reached from http://fantasy.sportsline.com   FB10SP


I turned the spreadsheet into charts - one for 5 years and one for 10.  I'm
not sure what story they tell exactly, except that the two move in tandem
with beverages appearing more volatile.  Also attached are new stock price
reaction charts for 5 and 10 years still including the S&P 500 index.  I
could not put all 6 on one chart - would have been too confusing anyhow I
think.
- cv
* sent Mark logo slides earlier today

Carolyn M. Vavrek
Manager - Human Capital Advisory Services
Deloitte & Touche
50 Fremont Street
San Francisco, CA  94105
phone: 415-783-5137
fax: 415-783-8760
e-mail: cvavrek@deloitte.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Guinney, Mark [mailto:Mark_Guinney@watsonwyatt.com]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 10:17 AM
To: "Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com" ; "Vavrek; Carolyn (US - San Francisco)"
Cc: "asama@yahoo.com" ; "Jeff_Dasovich@enron.com"
Subject: Indexdata

As promised, I've attached a spreadsheet that offers monthly industry
returns
(incl. dividends) for the beverage and food industries.  There is no
consolidated food & beverage sector.

**********************************************
Mark D. Guinney, CFA
Consultant
Watson Wyatt Investment Consulting
345 California Street, Ste. 1400
San Francisco, CA  94104
(415) 733-4487 ph.
(415) 733-4190 fax

- This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information
intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law.  -
If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and
are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.

 - stock price reaction 5 years.bmp
 - stock price reaction.bmp
 - Index returns.xls


Dear Real-Timers,

We are having the same problem with Montana Power's checkout as we had last
month: the volume of disputes is overwhelming!!

I have looked at the Inc sheets and found that EnPower matches the Inc.
sheets.
But in fairness to MPC's disputes, last month when I trusted the Inc sheets,
and I pulled the tapes, I found that our Inc. sheets were wrong in a number
of places.

Mike and I are doing the March 2001 checkout and are having trouble finding
your logs, your notebooks, or any information regarding the dates in question.

I am listing below the dates and HE that we are having disputes for.  Please
look at your logs and let me know the MW value, price, and who you spoke to
at MPC at what time.  Please do not give me what the Inc sheets say, as Mike
and I have already looked at them.

I expect an answer from each of you ASAP.

3/01/01  Meyers / Guzman   HE 1 (sold to WESCO) HE 4 (sold to PowerEx)
3/02/01  Causholli/Salisbury (sent to Holden) HE 8 (sold to Sempra)
3/06/01  Meyers/Salisbury & Solberg/Harasin  HE 13 ( 2 deals ) HE 21 (sold to
Snohomish)
3/08/01  Meyers/Harasin   HE 1 (sold to Sempra) HE 2 (sold to Sempra)
3/10/01  Causholli/Solberg & Slinger/Guzman  HE 7 (not in INC, but in
EnPower)    HE 8 ( sold to Powerex)   HE 15 (slod to PSPL)
3/11/01  Meyers/Guzman   HE 8 (sold to PowerEx)  HE 9 (sold to PowerEx)
3/13/01  Causholli/Porter   HE 9 (sold to WESCO)
3/14/01  Salisbury/Meyers/Linder  HE 2 (2 deals)
3/16/01  Salisbury/Porter & Causholli HE 4 (sold to SCL)  HE 20 (sold to PSPL)
3/21/01   Porter/Guzman   HE 6 (not in Inc)
3/23/01  Meyers/Linder   HE 13 (sold to WESCO)
3/28/01  Salisbury/Slinger & Dean  HE 5 (sold to PSPL)

As you can see, the number of dusputes is too large.  Please respond as soon
as possible so that we can chack out this week.  MPC is calling me every day.

Thanks for your help,

Virginia


Chris--Below is a list of questions that we need to address fairly quickly.
Please look it over and let's talk.  The items are not prioritized in any way.

1-Enron's invoices show that for deliveries to Muncie (Indiana Gas) off ANR
the
price index used is Michcon.citygate.GD.M.I.   The same is true for delivery
points into Michcon.   Is this correct, or are you actually using ANR ML-7
plus
the Exhibit 1 increment applicable to Michcon?   Exhibit 1 specifies ANR ML-7
as the price index for Michcon.

2-CES has completely exited the following market areas/zones as of April 1:
TCO 6-11, TCO 6-12.   However, because Exhibit 1 contains projected volumes
for
these two market areas in April 00, CES had to purchase from and resell to
Enron 90% of the April volumes contained in Exhibit 1.  Exhibit 1 contains
projected volumes for both market areas thru October 2000.   Are we required
to
do a purchase/sell-back in each of these future months, or can we dispense
with
this?  I refer you to Section 3.6 of the Gas Supply Assignment and Agency
Agreement (p. 11-12) as having some bearing on this issue.

3-The monthly volumes in Exhibit 1 off Iroquios into Central Hudson are
incorrect.  The 4,200 Dth is a monthly volume, not a Dth/day volume.  Since
the
supply for this point is already arranged as a back-to-back with Duke Energy
and since Duke appears to be billing us directly for this gas, I do not intend
to do a simultaneous "buy/sell"  with Enron of the volumes in excess of the
(erroneous) Exhibit 1 volume.  If you disagree, let's discuss.

4-According to Exhibit 1, CES gets monthly capacity releases for TCO 4-21
(O&R),  TCO 7-3 (West Ohio), TGP Zone 6 (Boston Gas?), would you please
provide
me with the Dth of capacity released to Enron as CES's agent on a monthly
basis
for April at each of these points?   (I also need these numbers for January,
February, and March.)

5-How is the local production behind NYSEG, NFGD-PA, and CPA priced?

6-How will Enron invoice CES for daily swings on TCO in situations where gas
was merely being re-directed from one delivery point (where we were long for
that day) to another delivery point (where we were short)?

There will undoubtedly be other questions.  I will direct them to you as they
arise.

Thanks.

Doug Kinney
Ph:  703-561-6339
Fax:  703-561-7317


Forgot to include you on this.
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 12/29/2000 08:56 AM -----

	Steven J Kean
	12/28/2000 09:19 PM

		 To: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Robert
Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Meeting with Governor Davis, need for additional
comments/suggestions

We met with Gov Davis on Thursday evening in LA.  In attendance were Ken Lay,
the Governor, the Governor's staff director (Kari Dohn) and myself.  The gov.
spent over an hour and a half with us covering our suggestions and his
ideas.  He would like some additional thoughts from us by Tuesday of next
week as he prepares his state of the state address for the following Monday.
Attached to the end of this memo is a list of solutions we proposed (based on
my discussions with several of you) as well as some background materials Jeff
Dasovich and I prepared.  Below are my notes from the meeting regarding our
proposals, the governor's ideas, as well as my overview of the situation
based on the governor's comments:

Overview:   We made great progress in both ensuring that he understands that
we are different from the generators and in opening a channel for ongoing
communication with his administration. The gov does not want the utilities to
go bankrupt and seems predisposed to both rate relief (more modest than what
the utilities are looking for) and credit guarantees.  His staff has more
work to do on the latter, but he was clearly intrigued with the idea.  He
talked mainly in terms of raising rates but not uncapping them at the retail
level.  He also wants to use what generation he has control over for the
benefit of California consumers, including utility-owned generation (which he
would dedicate to consumers on a cost-plus basis) and excess muni power
(which he estimates at 3000MW).  He foresees a mix of market oriented
solutions as well as interventionist solutions which will allow him to fix
the problem by '02 and provide some political cover.
Our proposals:  I have attached the outline we put in front of him (it also
included the forward price information several of you provided).  He seemed
interested in 1) the buy down of significant demand, 2) the state setting a
goal of x000 MW of new generation by a date certain, 3) getting the utilities
to gradually buy more power forward and 4) setting up a group of rate
analysts and other "nonadvocates" to develop solutions to a number of issues
including designing the portfolio and forward purchase terms for utilities.
He was also quite interested in examining the incentives surrounding LDC gas
purchases.   As already mentioned, he was also favorably disposed to finding
some state sponsored credit support for the utilities.
His ideas:  The gov read from a list of ideas some of which were obviously
under serious consideration and some of which were mere "brainstorming".
Some of these ideas would require legislative action.
State may build (or make build/transfer arrangements) a "couple" of
generation plants.  The gov feels strongly that he has to show consumers that
they are getting something in return for bearing some rate increases.  This
was a frequently recurring theme.
Utilities would sell the output from generation they still own on a cost-plus
basis to consumers.
Municipal utilties would be required to sell their excess generation in
California.
State universities (including UC/CSU and the community colleges) would more
widely deploy distributed generation.
Expand in-state gas production.
Take state lands gas royalties in kind.
negotiate directly with tribes and state governments in the west for
addtional gas supplies.
Empower an existing state agency to approve/coordinate power plant
maintenance schedules to avoid having too much generation out of service at
any one time.
Condition emissions offsets on commitments to sell power longer term in state.
Either eliminate the ISO or sharply curtail its function -- he wants to hear
more about how Nordpool works(Jeff- someone in Schroeder's group should be
able to help out here).
Wants to condition new generation on a commitment to sell in state.  We made
some headway with the idea that he could instead require utilities to buy
some portion of their forward requirements from new in-state generation
thereby accomplishing the same thing without using a command and control
approach with generators.
Securitize uncollected power purchase costs.
To dos: (Jeff, again I'd like to prevail on you to assemble the group's
thoughts and get them to Kari)
He wants to see 5 year fixed power prices for peak/ off-peak and baseload --
not just the 5 one year strips.
He wants comments on his proposals by Tuesday.
He would like thoughts on how to pitch what consumers are getting out of the
deal.
He wants to assemble a group of energy gurus to help sort through some of the
forward contracting issues.
Thanks to everyone for their help.  We made some progress today.


The topic of the November Gas Flows is Shortage to Surplus

Rita Hartfield
Phone:  713-853-5854
Fax:  713-646-4702
Cell:  713-504-5428
Rita.Hartfield@enron.com


<<lacomplaint.pdf>>

Douglas R. Tribble, Esq.
Pillsbury Winthrop LLP
101 W. Broadway, Suite 1800
San Diego, CA 92101
Main No.:  (619) 234-5000
Direct No.: (619) 544-3379
Fax No.:    (619) 236-1995
Mobile No.:  (619)  987-0202
mailto:dtribble@pillsburywinthrop.com
Bio.: http://pillsburywinthrop.com/attorneys/bio.asp?empid=T630626858

 - lacomplaint.pdf


You need that for a 1 month index deal?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Chavez, Alejandra
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 5:31 PM
To:	Germany, Chris
Subject:	deal

Hi Chris!

I noticed you entered sitara 1135849 today.  I need you to please write a ticket a.s.a.p.  so I can hedge the deal and book it financially.

Thank you,
Alejandra


Attached is the final letter.  Please note - there was a small change at the top of page 2.


We have received the following executed EEI agreements:

Sempra  Energy Trading Corp. - 11/15/2000
Dayton Power and Light Company - 12/5/2000

Copies will be distributed to Legal and Credit.


See line 29 (or so) on sheet DATA.

MRW or folks in Houston could probably backfill the RM to the late 80s.

Reserve margins in CA are negative absent imports.


Dear Joannie:

Dan Hutton just  contacted me and mentioned you'd be willing to forward this letter to the  appropriate IT development group(s) within Enron. While we offer incredible  programming services, we have had some difficulty in reaching the appropriate  parties within Enron.

Thank you very much for your assistance. If  you have any questions about our services, please contact me at  (512)917-6509.

Kind regards,

Jim Yang

 - Jim Yang (jimyang@vergenet.com).vcf
 - Enronv2.doc


What is the exact name for Georgia Pacific?  We do not see any transactions with them in the system.

Stacey

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Luong, Steven
Sent:	Thursday, January 10, 2002 1:08 PM
To:	White, Stacey W.
Subject:	Customer List

 << File: customers served 1-9-02.xls >>
Don asked me to send you this file.


Becky --

Pls take the lead in coordinating our response to these requests.

It is critical that legal litigation counsel (Richard Sanders and Bob
Williams) see and approve the responses before sending to FERC.

Thanks,

Jim

---------------------- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 05/15/2001
04:06 PM ---------------------------

"Randall Rich" <rrich@bracepatt.com> on 05/15/2001 02:23:14 PM
To: <jsteffe@enron.com>, <llawner@enron.com>, <rebecca.w.cantrell@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Fwd: Fax from '202 273 0901' (3 pages)

FERC's data request is attached.
Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 14:21:08 -0500
From: FAX <DC.FAX.RIGHTFAXUSER@bracepatt.com>
To: <rrich@bracepatt.com>
Subject: Fax from '202 273 0901' (3 pages)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_E4BED334.375636AC"

Time: 5/15/01 3:19:28 PM
Received from remote ID: 202 273 0901
Inbound user ID RICHRS, routing code 2125
Result: (0/352;0/0) Successful Send
Page record: 1 - 3
Elapsed time: 01:24 on channel 1

 - M00063C7.TIF


Shirley,

Thanks.

Vince

Shirley Crenshaw
08/21/2000 10:09 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pinnamaneni
Krishnarao/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vasant Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike A
Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph Hrgovcic/HOU/ECT@ECT, Grant Masson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tanya Tamarchenko/HOU/ECT@ECT, Zimin Lu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martin Lin/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Maureen Raymond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Osman Sezgen/HOU/EES@EES, Paulo
Issler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patricia Tlapek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amitava
Dhar/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Alex Huang/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
Kindall/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin G Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clayton
Vernon/Corp/Enron@ENRON, William Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jose
Marquez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Samer Takriti/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chonawee
Supatgiat/Corp/Enron@Enron, Shalesh Ganjoo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Halliburton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Elena Chilkina/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sevil
Yaman/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sofya Tamarchenko/NA/Enron@Enron, Bob
Lee/NA/Enron@Enron, Gwyn Koepke/NA/Enron@Enron, Guiseppe
Paleologo/NA/Enron@Enron, Hector Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anita
DuPont/NA/Enron@ENRON, Youyi Feng/NA/Enron@Enron, V Charles
Weldon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shane Green/HOU/EES@EES, Yana Kristal/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Colored Printer Taj Mahal

Hello everyone.

This memo only applies to the Research group on the 19th floor that use
the colored printer "Taj Mahal".

Vince has requested that I ask each of you to only use the colored printer
"Taj Mahal" for presentations, newsletters, etc. that require at least 90%
of color.  These cartridges are very expensive and several times we have
picked up a copy of something that only had color on the first page and it
would be maybe 15-20 pages long.  This is not cost effective.

If you have something that has color on the first page, but not on the rest
of the presentation, then please just print the first page on the color
printer
and the rest on "Bandit" or "Wagon".

Your help will be greatly appreciated!

Thanks!

Shirley


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Schmidt, Ann M.
Sent:	Friday, October 19, 2001 4:17 PM
Subject:	Enron Mentions

Enron Shares Fall on Concern Over CFO's Partnerships (Update4)
Bloomberg, 10/19/01

USA: UPDATE 1-Enron stock sustains further heavy losses.
Reuters English News Service, 10/19/01
Enron Corp. Cut to `Hold' at A.G. Edwards
Bloomberg, 10/19/01

BANDWIDTH BEAT: Enron Broadband Unit Takes A Beating
Dow Jones Energy Service, 10/19/01
Dynegy Chief: Bandwidth Growth Won't Wait For Trading
Dow Jones Energy Service, 10/19/01
UK: Jobs in base metals down but definitely not out.
Reuters English News Service, 10/19/01
New Power Hldg Sees Meeting 3Q Loss Estimate
Dow Jones News Service, 10/19/01

Enron Shares Fall on Concern Over CFO's Partnerships (Update4)
2001-10-19 16:24 (New York)

Enron Shares Fall on Concern Over CFO's Partnerships (Update4)

     (Updates with Chief Financial Officer Fastow didn't
immediately return a call for comment in fifth paragraph.)

     Houston, Oct. 19 (Bloomberg) -- Enron Corp.'s shares have
fallen 26 percent in the past three days on concern the biggest
energy trader's dealings with partnerships run by its chief
financial officer contributed to investment losses.

     Enron's stock dropped 10 percent today. Enron's board cost
the company at least $35 million by allowing Chief Financial
Officer Andrew Fastow to manage LJM Cayman and LJM2 Co-Investment,
partnerships that bought Enron assets, a shareholder alleged
Wednesday in a lawsuit.

     The lawsuit came the day after Enron reported $1.01 billion
in third-quarter losses from failed investments. The Wall Street
Journal reported $35 million of the losses were connected with the
two limited partnerships. Enron also reduced shareholders' equity
by $1.2 billion when it bought back 55 million shares from the
partnerships, the paper reported yesterday.

     ``It looks sleazy,'' said Roger Hamilton, a manager at John
Hancock's Value funds, which own 600,000 shares. ``If you are
someone who invests in a company's management, it's almost time to
punt with Enron.''

     Enron spokeswoman Karen Denne didn't return calls or written
requests seeking comment. Fastow didn't immediately return a
telephone call for comment.

     Fastow and a handful of associates made more than $7 million
last year in management fees and about $4 million in capital
increases on an investment of about $3 million in one of the
partnerships, the Journal reported today.

                        Buying Enron Assets

     Fastow is involved in 17 other similar companies and
partnerships that appear to have ties to Houston-based Enron,
based on filings with the Texas secretary of state.

     The foreign business corporations and limited liability
companies have directors, officers or managers whose address is
listed as 1400 Smith Street in Houston, Enron's corporate address,
according to Texas records.

     Fastow is listed as a director, officer or managing member in
each one. At least one of the companies bought and sold Enron
assets, including foreign power plants.

     Whitewing Management, which lists Fastow as its managing
member, received $807 million from the sale of Enron debt last
year.

    Under the terms of the debt sale, Whitewing is allowed to use
the proceeds to buy power plants from Enron or make other
``permitted investments.'' Whitewing has bought 14 Enron plants or
companies since 1999 and sold four.

     Enron's Denne has not responded to written requests about
Fastow's role at Whitewing or whether he used his knowledge of the
value of Enron assets to benefit outside investors or company
executives at Enron's expense.

     Shares of Enron fell $2.95 to $26.05. They have fallen
69 percent this year.

--Russell Hubbard in the Princeton newsroom, 609-750-4651 or
rhubbard2@bloomberg.net, and Jim Kennett in Houston,
(713) 353-4871 or jkennett@bloomberg.net/pjm/alp/pjm

USA: UPDATE 1-Enron stock sustains further heavy losses.

10/19/2001
Reuters English News Service
(C) Reuters Limited 2001.

(New first paragraph, adds additional analyst comment)
By Andrew Kelly
HOUSTON, Oct 19 (Reuters) - Enron Corp. stock sustained further heavy losses on Friday as investor confidence in the former Wall Street favorite was rocked by reports about the company's relationship with a limited partnership that was run until recently by Enron's chief financial officer.
The energy giant's stock closed down $2.95 or 10.2 percent at $26.05 per share, making a cumulative loss of 27 percent for a week in which Enron reported a third-quarter loss of $638 million, its first quarterly loss in over four years.
Analysts said confidence was shaken by several articles in the Wall Street Journal this week alleging possible conflicts of interest on the part of Chief Financial Officer Andrew Fastow, who until recently ran a limited partnership that bought assets worth hundreds of millions of dollars from Enron.
"I don't think this thing passes the smell test," said one analyst who spoke on condition of anonymity. "I think the CFO should be out of there right now. In the interest of the stockholders, that CFO should be gone," he said.
Enron has rejected the suggestion that there was anything improper about the arrangements, but Fastow severed his ties with the LJM2 partnership earlier this year to allay concerns raised by investors and analysts about his dual responsibilities.
POOR JUDGMENT?
Analysts said that at the very least, the arrangement showed poor judgment by senior managers at Enron, which recently pledged to be more open with investors and analysts following a series of high-profile stumbles that culminated with the shock resignation of new chief executive officer Jeff Skilling in August.
"For a company that had a lot of question marks around it already, these questions about financial dealings are really worrisome for investors," said Commerzbank Securities analyst Andre Meade. "It points to poor decision-making on behalf of the board and top management at Enron," he said.
Enron, North America's biggest buyer and seller of natural gas and electricity, was one of Wall Street's high flyers last year, when its stock posted a gain of 87 percent.
The stock's ascent was driven by enthusiasm for the company's plans to build a broadband telecommunications business and the success of its EnronOnline Internet energy trading platform.
This year Enron's shares have fallen 69 percent as sentiment toward broadband and the Internet soured, Skilling resigned after only six months as CEO, and the company's Dabhol power plant project in India became mired in a payments dispute.
Moody's Investors Service said earlier this week that it had placed all of Enron's long-term debt obligations on review for a possible downgrade after Enron took $1.01 billion in write-downs and charges that substantially reduced valuations for several non-core businesses, including broadband and water services.
Some of Enron's financing arrangements require the company to maintain investment grade credit ratings.
Analysts said Enron's credibility has been severely damaged and the recent reports about the LJM2 partnership had raised concerns that more unpleasant surprises may lie ahead.
"What don't we know that went on at that company? Where's the credibility?" asked one frustrated analyst. "We don't know if it's limited to this," he said.

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Enron Corp. Cut to `Hold' at A.G. Edwards
2001-10-19 16:27 (New York)

     Princeton, New Jersey, Oct. 19 (Bloomberg Data) -- Enron Corp. (ENE US)
was downgraded to ``hold'' from ``buy'' by analyst Michael C Heim at A.G.
Edwards & Sons Inc.

BANDWIDTH BEAT: Enron Broadband Unit Takes A Beating
By Michael Rieke

10/19/2001
Dow Jones Energy Service
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

A Dow Jones Newswires Column

HOUSTON -(Dow Jones)- Early last year, Enron Corp.'s (ENE) hype and skyrocketing share price enticed a number of other energy companies into the telecommunications business.
Now investors are wondering whether Enron is leading the charge out of telecom.
The company announced Oct. 16 that its broadband unit lost $80 million before interest and taxes in the third quarter on revenue of $4 million. In the third quarter of last year, the unit lost $20 million on revenue of $162 million.
Enron also recorded a $180 million non-recurring charge for restructuring its broadband unit in the third quarter of this year. That amount included severance costs for cutting 400-500 jobs, loss on sale of inventory and the reduced value of Enron's content services.
At an analysts meeting Oct. 16, Enron Chairman and Chief Executive Ken Lay said the broadband business is "not that robust" right now. Industry revenue is low and there's substantial overcapacity in the bandwidth market, "more than even we anticipated," Lay said.
The company still has a problem finding creditworthy counterparties for bandwidth trading. Consolidation in the telecom sector has also eliminated potential trading partners.
"A year ago it looked like an excellent business to get into," he said. "Others thought so, too."
Looking back, Enron could have gotten into the broadband business with less capital, Lay said. It spent "too much too soon."
An Ominous Comparison

He compared Enron's move into telecom with its move into the water business with its Azurix unit. That comparison probably won't be good news to those who still have broadband jobs at Enron.
Azurix caused Enron to take a bigger writedown - $287 million - than broadband in the third quarter. The water business has been a bigger and longer-lasting headache than broadband.
Maybe Enron's surviving broadband employees will feel better knowing that Lay told analysts the company is exploring alternatives to preserve its play in telecom at a reasonable price so it will be ready when the business recovers.
It's trying to reduce general and administrative costs in broadband to $40 million a quarter and is on track to reach that goal next year, he said. It could cut those costs even more in order to sustain the business.
Meanwhile, the company is trying to determine which parts of the telecom business it wants to be in, he said.
Enron President and Chief Operating Officer Greg Whalley told analysts the company needs to determine how much network and hardware it needs.
At one time, they had thought that they wanted to use physical network assets as a springboard, Whalley said. Now they "wouldn't want to forever be in the network business."
Both executives mentioned the possibility of joint ventures in telecom. Lay said other companies are asking Enron to do them. Whalley said the company has talked about exchanging fiber and other assets.
The one part of the telecom business Enron still seems committed to is broadband intermediation. "Intermediation" is a term the company uses in most of its commodity businesses, said an Enron spokeswoman. It's a combination of trading and deal origination - wholesale and enterprise customers.
More Bad News Expected

Rebecca Followill, a research analyst for Howard, Weil, Labouisse, Friedrichs Inc., she had expected a larger writedown in broadband for the third quarter.
"If you look at how much the stocks of their peers in broadband have fallen, you've got to figure that their assets' values have fallen similarly," Followill told Bandwidth Beat. "I was expecting more like an 80% writedown in broadband."
Another analyst, who didn't want to be identified, said he also expects more broadband writedowns from Enron. "To the extent that they can take more writedowns, I think it would make eminently good sense to do it."
He predicted "a $200 million haircut" in the first quarter of next year because of a goodwill valuation issue.
And that might not be the end of it. Enron had a net of $948 million of broadband property, plant and equipment at the end of last year, he said. They had another $600 million of risk management asset receivables, inventories and working capital items.
Followill doesn't see much future in broadband for Enron.
"I think the business will shrink to the point where it won't be shown as a key sector in their reporting," she said.
Enron might keep a small broadband group in case the market rebounds, she said. Her investor clients don't expect broadband to contribute to Enron's earnings within the next three years.
She thinks Enron is looking for an exit strategy.
The other analyst said Enron is trying to preserve some value in broadband. "It doesn't look like there's any right now, to be honest," he said. "They'll carry the trading operation to some degree."
-By Michael Rieke, Dow Jones Newswires; 713-547-9207; michael.rieke@dowjones.com

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Dynegy Chief: Bandwidth Growth Won't Wait For Trading
By Erwin Seba
Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

10/19/2001
Dow Jones Energy Service
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

HOUSTON -(Dow Jones)- Dynegy Inc. (DYN) Chairman and Chief Executive Chuck Watson understands why some think he is mistaken in believing the bandwidth sector has reached its bottom and is recovering.
But those critics don't understand his bandwidth business, Watson told Dow Jones Newswires in an exclusive interview. They don't understand how the business world has changed since the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, he said.
In announcing third-quarter results for Dynegy Monday, Watson said the bottom in bandwidth demand was reached on Sept. 11 and that the market would begin recovery in the fourth quarter of this year.
Businesses are reassessing where to store data and how to distribute operations to avoid losing everything in a sudden catastrophic event, be it of natural or human origin. That's what's driving the recovery, he said.
Also, businesses will avoid travel, he said, relying instead on video conferencing.
Enron Corp. (ENE) Chairman Kenneth Lay said Tuesday that he hasn't seen any signs of recovery in telecom. The bandwidth market is suffering, in part, because there are few creditworthy companies to trade with, he said.
"They're trying to find trading partners for broadband," Watson said. "That's going to be tough to do." Dynegy isn't concentrating on bandwidth trading because there isn't "a realistic model" for it yet, he said. "I said two years ago it was at least two years away. I still think it's probably at least two years away, before we actually call it a trading commodity."
The metro-area infrastructure that Dynegy and other companies are building will create connections between networks, which are needed in order to trade bandwidth as a commodity, Watson said.
It's unfortunate that Enron's model for bandwidth as a traded commodity is the dominant image for the entire market, Watson said. Dynegy's model includes telecom contracts, negotiated directly with customers for long-term supply of bandwidth.
Dynegy's bandwidth trading desk is staffed by four people. For the past several months, they have been buying bandwidth for Dynegy's customers. The goal has been to build a customer base. "We're looking at being an intermediary, and really looking at the same customers that we feed energy today."
Since Dynegy lit its 16,000 route-mile network two weeks ago, the trading desk has been trying to fill the company's network instead of buying bandwidth from others. "I'm trying to find enterprises that have communication requirements," Watson said.
He pointed to ChevronTexaco Corp. (CHX) as a target for those services. "They have offices that never talked to each before," he said. "Now they've got to talk to each other. I would say that the credit quality of Chevron and Texaco is pretty reasonable."
ChevronTexaco owns about 26% of Dynegy, said a Dynegy spokesman. Dynegy and ChevronTexaco already have a large energy trading relationship which includes natural gas and gas liquids.
The average burn rate of Dynegy Global Communications, the corporation's telecommunications unit, is $20 million to $25 million a quarter, Watson said. In the third quarter, it lost $15 million, down from $20 million in the second quarter.
Dynegy predicts that Global Communications will break even or record a small loss before interest and taxes in the fourth quarter.
"If we can get to (income of) $10 million per month - that's what we need really," he said. "If we can get there by the end of next year, I'll be very happy. I think by '03, this market will have righted itself."
Watson believes telecommunications has the potential to transform Dynegy.
"Dynegy is an energy company," he said. "Our energy merchant company is doing very well and business is growing like a weed...(Telecommunications) is not our core business by any stretch right now. But I'd love to be able to tell you it's going to be. I'd love to be able to tell you it is someday."
-By Erwin Seba, Dow Jones Newswires; 713-547-9214; erwin.seba@dowjones.com

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

UK: Jobs in base metals down but definitely not out.
By Amanda Cooper

10/19/2001
Reuters English News Service
(C) Reuters Limited 2001.

LONDON, Oct 18 (Reuters) - Dismal industrial demand and the fickleness of hedge funds seduced by more volatile markets have slashed London Metal Exchange members' profits over the past year and set off a gathering wave of job cuts.
The decline and fall of base metal prices in the past year and a half has prompted a series of high-profile companies to withdraw from the market, casting a pall over next week's yearly LME Week industry gathering in London.
Jobs have gone from front office to back in trading houses and banks, raising questions about the prospects for those now seeking work.
"Good people can always be placed. As long as there is a job to fill and the company has a budget to hire," Sarah Gilley of London-based recruitment group Exchange Consulting said.
"Where the situation starts to get difficult is where everyone is cutting budgets, people are not being replaced when they leave and there have been an awful lot of redundancies."
Last week, ScotiaMocatta, a subsidiary of the Bank of Nova Scotia and a key ring dealing member, unveiled its decision to give up open outcry trading on the LME floor, prompting around 25 job losses among traders, phone jockeys and clerks.
Then blue-blooded banker N.M. Rothschild & Sons closed its London and New York base metals units. It left its core precious metals business intact, but 20 base metals staff were laid off in the process.
In the same week, the LME's largest floor trader, Enron Metals, said it planned to cut 10 to 20 percent of its metals staff as part of an exercise to cut 250 to 500 jobs in the Enron Group .
SECURITY
With three big market players and several major banks with commodities divisions slashing jobs at the same time, competition in the labour market will intensify and those in work are becoming wary about job security.
"What we're finding at the moment is that there is still demand for traders with a track record, which is possibly increasing because people are nervous about their jobs and so they're keen to stay put," Gilley said.
"So whereas someone who might be a big money-spinner with a track record would have previously stayed in their job for two to three years, they are now staying for three to five years.
"They probably feel that they're reasonably safe where they are, they're well recognised and not going to stick their necks out," she said.
BONUS FEARS
October has never traditionally been a strong month for the the jobs market in base metals as players are often distracted by LME week functions and conferences
Also, traders tend to be looking towards their annual performance-linked bonuses, which are usually announced at the end of the year.
"Those who are in work at the moment are sticking. Often at this time of year, people are hanging on for their bonuses. But I don't think any of them are anticipating good bonuses. They're probably just happy to have a job," Sian Griffiths of Exchange Consulting said.
LME volumes traded have been fallen over the past 18 months as the powerful hedge funds that once took a shine to the metals swarmed into areas such as hi-tech and telecomms stocks.
Metals traders who handled the large volume of fund activity have begun to focus again on moree traditional clients, and this may yet prove a boon for the jobs market.
Companies are seeking to fill a shortage of staff schooled in the traditional practices of trading physical metal.
"A lot of companies who had sidelined the traditional physical business are now re-aligning their focus and need poeple who understand the physical market and know how to set up a hedge and manage it, " Gilley said.
"The other area where demand has markedly increased in comparison to a few years ago is marketing," she added.
As for morale in the industry, individuals' confidence in their future is seemingly undimmed.
"Just because I've lost my job doesn't mean I'm going to sell my Porsche," one trader said.

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

New Power Hldg Sees Meeting 3Q Loss Estimate

10/19/2001
Dow Jones News Service
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

PURCHASE, N.Y. -(Dow Jones)- New Power Holding Inc. (NPW) expects to meet its prior third quarter loss estimates; and said it has revised an agreement with Enron Corp. (ENE), lowering the collateral New Power must post under a master netting agreement.
In a press release Friday, New Power said the amendment to the Enron pact and cost-cutting efforts will allow the company to continue to conduct business until it secures ongoing asset-backed financing.
The company reiterated its earlier expectations of a third quarter loss of $65 million to $70 million, or $1.12 to $1.20 a share.
Analysts put the company's third quarter loss at $1.16 a share, according to Thomson Financial/First Call.
Third quarter revenue will be "slightly lower" than the $60 million to $65 million forecast in August, New Power said.

In the year-ago third quarter New Power lost $1.23 a share on revenue of $18.19 million.
The amendment to the master netting agreement with Enron North America Corp., Enron Energy Services Inc. and Enron Power Marketing Inc. affects the master cross-product netting, setoff, and security agreement, and expands through Jan. 4 the types of collateral that New Power is permitted to post to the Enron units.
Under the amended pact, the first $70 million of posted collateral must be in the form of cash, while amounts in excess of $70 million may consist of not more than $40 million of eligible receivables and inventory of New Power, valued at discounts specified in the amendment, and subject to a $25 million limit for October 2001.
Shares of New Power traded recently on the New York Stock Exchange at $1.67, up 1 cent, or 0.6%, on early composite volume of 7,900 shares. Average daily volume is 223,800 shares.
-Bill Platt; Dow Jones Newswires; 201-938-5400

Copyright ? 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Can you look into this?

Thanks
----- Forwarded by Sandi M Braband/HOU/ECT on 04/18/2001 09:53 AM -----

	Leslie Robinson@ENRON
	04/18/2001 08:27 AM

		 To: Sandi M Braband/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Rosa Brown/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: HPL assignment to ENA

Texas Utilities Fuel (k#012-88968-02-001) is trying to hold HPL responsible
for imbalances incurred after October 1998, but according to the contract
brief Texas Utilities Fuel  was assigned to ENA.  No one in contracts can
find the assignment paperwork.  They don't know if it was misplaced or never
done, and the counterparty was not informed of the assignment.  For our
records and Texas Utilities' would you or, since your busy with Triple Lux,
whomever in legal type up the paperwork.  Let me know what you need from me,
and I will be more than happy to get it for you.  Thanks.


Darren,

Twister - just want to confirm with you...the one payment for this...does that payment correspond to the three partial terminations, or all five (three partial plus two full) ?

Diane

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Giron, Darron C.
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 1:14 PM
To:	Anderson, Diane
Subject:	Heartland and Twister Unwinds

Diane,

Heartland Energy Group, Inc.
We essentially terminated VU4418.1 and VZ4240.1 on 9/24/01 and paid them $69,200 on 9/26/01 which is in VZ4240.3

Twister Gas Services, LLC
This is more complicated.  We terminated VL2515.1 and Y05186.2 totally.  We partially terminated VN4969.1 (Oct-01 & Nov-01 only), VU4647.1 (Oct-01 thru Dec-01 only), and Y05186.1 (Oct-01 thru Dec-01 only).  They were terminated on 9/24/01 and they were paid $116,700 on 9/26/01 which is in Y05186.7

I sent a fax to 713-646-2495 of the Termination Agreement they have for a prior deal.  They want one similar to this for these two deals.  Please call if you have any questions.  I appreciate your help.

DG
3-9573


You are kind - and that's one of the things that I love about you!  I suppose
that we should get serious about the dinner for Mom and Dad, since it is two
months away.  I will be glad to handle invitations.  I will look for some
this week and coordinate with Mom on final names and addresses.  Cara had
sent an e:mail a few weeks ago with some detailed questions to answer.  I
still have a copy of it, but haven't focused on it to date.  I will call you
tonight and we can go through it and offer to Cara to follow up with
Josephine's House if that would help her given her current charge at home.
--Sally

"Cindy White" <cwhite@viviance.com> on 04/03/2001 09:28:33 AM
To: <Sally.Beck@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: FW: Truth in 13 words

I actually think you look young in those pictures--you are way too
critical!!!

-----Original Message-----
From: Sally.Beck@enron.com [mailto:Sally.Beck@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 9:23 AM
To: cwhite@viviance.com
Subject: Re: FW: Truth in 13 words

Exactly!  Mom sent me the pictures from the hospital with Anna.  I could
easily be mistaken for her grandmother, I'm afraid.  I see pictures of
myself and wonder who that older person is?!?  --Sally

"Cindy White" <cwhite@viviance.com> on 04/03/2001 09:14:22 AM

To:   "Sister Sally" <sally.beck@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  FW: Truth in 13 words

Sally...

We got this yesterday from a friend of Richard's--it made me giggle...see
you soon!

Cindy

<<
 Inside every older person

 is a younger person

 wondering what the fuck happened.
  >>


Got a question about Enron or what our businesses are doing?  Ask Jeff Skilling!  Join him for an Office of the Chairman "open mike" session today (May 30) on eSpeak at 10 a.m. Houston time.
Can't make the live event?  No worries.  Go to eSpeak (http://ethink.enron.com/eSpeak/exec/default.asp) now and submit your question.  Jeff will try to answer it during his event and you can read the transcript later.

Cost cutting ideas are still coming into the Thinkbank (http://nahou-lnapp01.corp.enron.com/eThink/Thinkbank.nsf/HomePage?OpenPage).  We know you've got some great ideas tucked away in that brainy head of yours -- deposit them into the ThinkBank!

There's some fiesty conversations going on in eMeet http://nahou-lnapp01.corp.enron.com/eThink/eMeet.nsf.  Start your own today!


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/07/2000 05:46
PM ---------------------------

"George Kutzschbach" <gkutzschbach@fulbright.com> on 12/07/2000 05:07:09 PM
To: Ben.F.Jacoby@enron.com, Kay.Mann@enron.com, CCampbell@KSLAW.com,
JKeffer@KSLAW.com
cc: areynaud@coral-energy.com, dwhaley@coral-energy.com,
TSeigler@coral-energy.com

Subject: DeltaView Document Distribution

Attached is a revised draft of the Letter Agreement which has been
redlined to show the changes from ENA's last draft.  I am also attaching
an insert which such be substituted for Section 6.2(e) of the LLC
Agreement.

 - Redline.rtf
 - 5wn6w01_.DOC