If you are looking to feed and challenge your faith, visit
Crosswalk.com's Spiritual Life Channel at:
http://spiritual.crosswalk.com
-----------
N E I L   A N D E R S O N   D A I L Y   D E V O T I O N A L
             from Freedom in Christ Ministries

October 23

EMOTIONAL BAGGAGE

The troubles of my heart are enlarged; bring me out of my
distresses (Psalm 25:17).

Unlike our day-to-day emotions which are the product of our
day-to-day thought life, emotional baggage from the past is
always there. Years of exposure and experience in life have
etched grooves in our memory banks which are triggered by current
events.

For example, if your kind, loving grandfather was named Bill, you
probably have a favorable emotional reaction to other people
named Bill. But if the school bully was named Bill, your initial
reaction to the Bills in your life is probably negative. If your
spouse suggests, "Let's name our first child Bill," you might
even react, "Over my dead body!"

I call these long-term emotions which lurk beneath the surface
primary emotions. The intensity of your primary emotions is
determined by your previous life history. The more traumatic your
experience, the more intense will be your primary emotion. Many
of these primary emotions will lie dormant and have very little
effect on your life until something comes along to trigger them.
Have you ever brought up a topic of conversation which upset
someone and sent him storming out of the room? "What set him
off?" you wondered. He was "set off" because a bad experience in
his past was triggered by your topic. The trigger is any present
event which he associates with the past conflict.

Most people try to control their primary emotions by avoiding the
people or events which trigger them. But you can't isolate
yourself completely from everything which may set off a response.
You are bound to see something on TV or hear something in a
conversation which will bring to mind your unpleasant experience.
You must learn how to resolve previous conflicts or the emotional
baggage will accumulate and the past will control your life.

During the next few days, we will consider ways to resolve our
emotional baggage from the past.

Lord, I don't want to be controlled by past events. Show me how I
can resolve these issues so I can walk in freedom today.

-----------
This daily devotional is published and distributed by
Crosswalk.com.  It is written by Neil Anderson at
< http://www.ficm.org >.

You can purchase "Daily in Christ" and other titles by Neil Anderson at
christianbook.com (Christian Book Distributors - CBD).
< http://shopping.crosswalk.com/bye/devo_na >

Additional devotionals are available from Crosswalk.com:
< http://devotionals.crosswalk.com >.
-----------
To read the Current Feature Story from ReligionToday,
go to http://religiontoday.crosswalk.com/CurrentFeatureStory/

For today's complete News Summary from ReligionToday,
go to http://religiontoday.crosswalk.com/CurrentNewsSummary/

-----------
For Copyright Terms go to http://www.crosswalk.com/info/copyright

____________________SUBSCRIPTION INFO_______________________

* You subscribed to Neil Anderson as:
         < jeff.king@enron.com >
* To unsubscribe from this newsletter immediately, click here:
         < http://link.crosswalk.com/UM/U.ASP?A3.14.261895 >
  If that link is not clickable, simply copy and paste it into
  your browser window.
* To change your address:  unsubscribe your old address
  and then subscribe your new address.
* To subscribe, send an email to:
  < SUBSCRIBE-neilanderson@lists.crosswalk.com > or go to
  < http://www.crosswalk.com/lists > for a complete list of
  our newsletters.
* Copyright ? 2001 Crosswalk.com, Inc. and its Content
  Providers. All rights reserved.

____________________________________________________________


Here is the unexecuted copy of the Interconnect Operating Agreement with
Entergy

 - MDEA_IOA_2-25-01.doc


This is my first day back from vacation.  We need to augement e:mail so that
requests sent when someone is on vacation can be routed elsewhere if urgent.

This is request is approved.

Why are there so many different formats for granting systems access?  Some
have an approval button, some don't.  You requested a return e:mail.  It
seems as if each time I look at one of these it is different.  The status
button and detail button below contain no information.

Information Risk Management
07/17/2000 11:36 AM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: For Sally Beck's approval

Below you will find a copy of a request that is awaiting your approval.
Please advise us as to your approval or rejection of this request by way of
email.

I thank you in advance for your cooperation in this matter.

Leola Barnett
IRM
X37965
---------------------- Forwarded by Information Risk Management/HOU/ECT on
07/17/2000 11:34 AM ---------------------------

	 Security Resource Request System				Pending VP Approval
 Resource Request					How to find the status of this request...
	General Information		Initials:

Requestor:	Jackie Morgan/HOU/ECT	Phone:	713-853-9177
Requested For:		Jackie Morgan/HOU/ECT
Request Type:	Update Access
RC #:	2939	WO #:
Company #:	413	Priority:	High
Manager:	Michael Eiben	VP:	Sally Beck
Location:			Houston
					In the Request Processing section, see the status column for each requested
resource.
					Look at the overall status of the request in the title bar above. The status
will display Closed when your request is complete.
					Click the "Status" button below.
Comments:
			Advised this PM that I will need Terminal Server Access for use by 8:00 am
06/15/2000.		Request #: JMON-4LAQS3
					Submitted: 06/14/2000 02:50:52 PM

	Name	Cost	Status	Implementation Comments
	Application/Database
	Terminal Server 1-800 Number
Terminal Server 4.0
	Not Started
Not Started

	Request Processing Path
Processed By	Status	When	Comments

	Manager	Approved	06/14 03:37 PM

	VP

	Security

	Implementation

		Editing History (Only the last five (5) are shown)

Edit #	Past Authors	Edit Dates
1
2
3
4
5	Jackie Morgan
Jackie Morgan
Jackie Morgan
Jackie Morgan
Michael Eiben 	06/14/2000 02:49:08 PM
06/14/2000 02:49:56 PM
06/14/2000 02:50:48 PM
06/14/2000 02:50:52 PM
06/14/2000 03:37:12 PM


Thanks for our email.  At the present time, Ena is not putting new GISBs in place.  However, we have a Enfolio Spot Agreement which will achieve the same purpose.  Please see attached.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Anthony Targan <targana@dteenergy.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:35 AM
To:	dperlin@enron.com
Subject:	GISB contract with DTE Energy Trading

Debra,

It was a pleasure speaking with you yesterday regarding the GISB
contract.
I look forward to receipt of your suggested language for the netting and
dispute resolution provisions, and your decision on the acceptability of
our Sections 10.3, 10.4, and 15 (Confidentiality).

Please do not hesitate to call if we need to discuss this further.
Unless you instruct otherwise, we intend to sign the Base Contract
first, and then FedEx partially executed originals to you for signature.

Thanks,
--Anthony

 - targana.vcf << File: targana.vcf >>


Bill/Philippe-

Below is a summary of the major problems which occurred the past 96 hours and
the steps taken to mitigate the damage and risk.

Enron Center North (1400 Smith)

As a result of the flooding downtown, approximately six skyscrapers had their
electrical vaults flooded and began to cause cascading problemd in the
electrical grid downtown. The net result was the loss of one of the two 35kv
circuits which serve 1400 Smith. We (engineers, EES Maint, electrical subs)
believe at the time the circuits blew we shifted from three phase to single
phase power, which caused an imbalance in the load to the building.

Consequently, UPS "C" which serves a portion of the Lv 34 Data Ctr, the Rolm
phone switch, and a protion of the Traders floors lost a circuitboard, and
blew two internal fuses. This power degradation caused PDU "S" on Lv 34 to
trip its main breaker and shutdown power load to servers and equipment on
this PDU. This occurred shortly after Noon on Saturday.

Response/Restoration

> UPS "D" transferred load from UPS "C" as the N+1 back up and carried the
full load of the UPS loss as designed
> EPSC/electrical sub (Henderson Electric); EES Maint; IT worked together to
power down systems to begin repair work by 4:00pm Saturday
> EPSC/EES Maint coordinated with Pillar/Henderson Elec to obtain replacement
parts and begin the repairs. By 9:30pm all repairs to UPS"C" had been made
and the system bought back on line. As a measure of extra protection the back
up genset for Enron Ctr North  was in operation
> Reliant Energy restored the circuit at approximately 10:30pm Saturday
evening
> EPSC/EES Maint and subs conducted a thorough review of all electrical and
back up systems Saturday evening
> Enron Network IT Operations began restoration of all affected systems
Saturday evening
> EPSC/EES Maint obtained diesel fuel and topped off all gensets Saturday in
case of additional problems and due to fuel consumption during the outage

Other Building damage was limited to flooding in the tunnels, and water
damage/flooding to portions of the Body Shop on Lv B-1

Enron Center South (1500 Louisiana)

Impact/Damage Summary

> Levels 8 & 9  received very limited amounts of water from the core area
elevator shafts and exterior curtainwall. There was no exposure to water on
any systems or network cabling during the entire period. (Response) Crews
contained and cleaned all water as it traced into the building.
> ALL IDF closets on Lvs 3-5 Traders Floors remained dry throughout the
duration of the rains/flooding on Friday & Saturday
> Lv 6 received some water from Lv 7. (Response) The area was contained and
cleaned. No additional damage beyond Tuesday evenings flooding occurred
> Due to extreme street flooding and water pressure, a 10" sanitary sewer
line tied into ECS burst on Friday evening causing extensive flooding of Lv
B-1 area (approximately 4-6 inches of water in the basement. (Response)
Clark & Way Engr was able to install a temporary plug in the line to stop the
on going flood waters from penetrating the basement. Clean up has continued
throughout the weekend
> Due to the extreme flooding and water pressure, the water seal of the
Reliant Vault burst early Saturday and flooded the electrical vault room with
24-30" of water. This resulted in a complete loss of power at approximately
1:30pm on Staurday afternoon. The back up systems engaged and operated per
design to support the Data Ctr and Traders Floors. The temporary cooling
tower went off line. Prior to the flooding Clark had been in the process of
tieing in the temporary feed into the back up system by 7-1-01 in prep for
the migration (Response)
 * Clark used back up water pumps to pump out and clean the Reliant
electrical vault, as well as maintained operation of the back up systems
 * The Data Ctr AHU's were kept on line with the dehumidifiers/blowers to
modulate the airflow in the Data Ctr. EPSC had Way Engr techs use
temp/humidity probes
    to monitor the areas. The recordings indicated temps on Lvs 8 & 9 did not
exceed 78 degrees and relative humidity did not exceed 68% during the outage
 * Clark/Fisk Elec/EPSC coordinated desing efforts and obtained gear on an
emergency basis and completed the tie in off the temporary coolong tower to
the
    generators by 10:30pm
 * Reliant Energy is still cleaning and replacing gear in th vault room.
Presntly (AT 11:00PM Sunday) we have one circuit operational in the building
and 50% of the
              Reliant  gear on line). We are still operating all systems
safely on the back up sytems for the past 36 hours. It is expected Relaint
will be complete by 7:00am.
   Clark; the engineers and MEP subs shall be conducting a thorough system
review and repirs as required of all systems throughout the building during
the coming
   week.

In summary, the back up systems in both facilities did engage and operate as
designed; however, due to the extreme conditons and stress placed upon the
systems the facility held up extremely well. I would also like to note
throughout the ordeal beginning Friday evening through Sunday, everyone
(Enron NetWorks;EES FacilitiesClark Const;Way Engring;Fisk Electric;Henderson
Electric; KW-Pillar;Hines) did an outstanding job under enourmous pressure
and the most severe conditions I have seen in downtown Houston.
Communication, around the clock work  and cool heads managed to assess damage
and develop action/restoration plans to facilitate repairs for Monday business

Let me know if you need further details on specific issues or items.

regards-

Henry


Denise, please put these meetings on my calendar.  Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 11/07/2000
10:55 AM ---------------------------
MARTHA
BENNER
11/07/2000 10:55 AM

To: Dari Dornan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lee Huber/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Maria
Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tony Pryor/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kathy
Ringblom/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jim
Talcott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Janet Cones/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Denise LaGesse/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ann
Smith/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: 2001 Staff Meetings (Drew's)

The schedule is as follows:

January 2
January 23
February 13
March 6
March 27
April 17
May 8
May 29
June 19
July 10
July 31
August 21
September 11
October 2
October 23
November 13
December 4

The meetings are scheduled for 1:30 pm and all are in the Video Conference
Room (49C2 in Houston).  I will let you know when conflicts arise.

Call if you have any questions (x7330).

Thank you.

Martha Benner


I would like to place a $33 bid for Prentice


Thu,

I talked with Lee Papyoti about the Equistar buybacks.  I created deal 675086
as an ENA buyback.  However, after you have allocated the volume between the
Equistar plants, please get with Lee and have him look over everything.

D

	From:  Thu T Nguyen                           03/15/2001 08:50 AM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: deal 34342

Daren,

I am trying to make up the gas for ENA deals on meter 1552,8024,1062, (deals
240061, 378904, 394489, 487588).  Per Anita, these need to be kept whole.  I
have the option of a buyback or swing on 1373....but, there is not enough gas
at meter 1373 to do this.  Please let me know if there is another way I can
achieve this.

Thu
---------------------- Forwarded by Thu T Nguyen/HOU/ECT on 03/14/2001 01:11
PM ---------------------------
Aimee Lannou   03/14/2001 12:36 PM

To: Thu T Nguyen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: deal 34342

Daren's response.

---------------------- Forwarded by Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT on 03/14/2001 12:36
PM ---------------------------

Daren J Farmer
03/14/2001 12:30 PM
To: Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: deal 34342

We have a buyback under HPL (#586534).  ENA had only 7,000/day scheduled at
mtr 1373 in Feb.  In reviewing the daily volumes in POPS, I didn't see any
days with flow under 18,000.  So, we should not need a buyback for ENA.  Any
shortages should be allocated to the HPL ticket.

D

Aimee Lannou   03/14/2001 11:03 AM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: deal 34342

Daren - Thu has asked if I can extend deal 343421 thru Feb. '01.  I told her
I didn't have the authority to do this.  It is for Equistar.  It looks like
it is a term deal expiring Jan. '01.   She wants it added to keep the ENA
deal whole.  What do you suggest?

AL
---------------------- Forwarded by Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT on 03/14/2001 10:58
AM ---------------------------
To: Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: deal 34342

Aimee,

This is the deal for Equistar.  There is not enough gas at meter 1373 to keep
the ENA deal whole.  I need this deal to create buyback.  This was out there
last month and Anita told me to get the deal extended.  Let me know if there
is another way.

Thu

Aimee Lannou   03/14/2001 10:23 AM

To: Thu T Nguyen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: deal 34342

Why do you need it extended?  This deal may not be able to get extended.
Which meter are you having problems with?

To: Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: deal 34342

Aimee,

I am so sorry...I don't know what's wrong with me.  The deal is 343421.  If
you can't extend this deal please let me know.  Thanks

Thu

Aimee Lannou   03/14/2001 07:59 AM

To: Thu T Nguyen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juliann Kemp/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject: Re: deal 34342

I don't have access to this ticket.  It is an IM Canada ticket.

	From:  Thu T Nguyen                           03/13/2001 05:45 PM

To: Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: deal 34342

Aimee, please extend the deal above to Feb 01.


There were no new entries for June 19, 20 or 21, 2002.  Attached is the Master Termination Log, which has shaded any changes to previous entries.

Please note the following:

The following has been on the Master Termination Log as "Y" for a valid termination and has now been marked as "N":

Norampac Inc.			ENA		ISDA (06/04/1999)

The early termination date for the following have changed:

Growmark, Inc.		ENA		various option contracts (financial)
Nordea Bank Norge ASA	ENA		ISDA (02/10/1999)
   (f/k/a Christiania Bank OG Kreidtkasse ASA)

Stephanie Panus
Enron Wholesale Services
EB704A
ph:  713.345.3249
fax:  713.646.3490


Eric, I have at least 2 tickets and possibly 4 tickets for tonights game.... I believe it starts at 7:00 PM.

I did ask eric boyt... have not heard back. Can you see if you or any of your people would like to use them.

Let me know.. I want to make sure they get used.

BT


Tana/Leslie,

Attached is the NDA that we used with Xuma.  They've signed it in hard copy
and
sent it back to me, but since then our group has switched from EBS to Net
Works.
Please advise as to how you need to modify this.

Thanks,
Laura

----- Forwarded by Laura Howenstine/Enron Communications on 10/23/00 10:07 AM
-----
|--------+------------------------>
|        |          Robin Hill    |
|        |                        |
|        |          09/12/00 03:44|
|        |          PM            |
|        |                        |
|--------+------------------------>

>----------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                            |
  |      To:     Laura Howenstine/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications    |
  |
cc:                                                                   |
  |      Subject:     Re: one more NDA(Document link not
converted)            |

>----------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Here is the NDA for XUMA.

(See attached file: XUMA.doc)

Robin L. Hill, Legal Specialist
Enron Broadband Services
1400 Smith, Suite 4545
Houston, Texas 77002
(713)853-3255
(713)646-8537 fax
Robin_Hill@Enron.net

|--------+------------------------>
|        |          Laura         |
|        |          Howenstine    |
|        |                        |
|        |          09/12/00 02:48|
|        |          PM            |
|        |                        |
|--------+------------------------>

>----------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                            |
  |      To:     Robin Hill/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications          |
  |
cc:                                                                   |
  |      Subject:     one more NDA(Document link not
converted)                |

>----------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Thanks, Robin.  I actually have another NDA to ask you for and it's a last
minute request for a meeting that I'm attending tomorrow in San Francisco (for
which I'm leaving in an hour or so).

The counter party is a company called XUMA.  The relevant info is below.
Thanks
and I'll follow the same procedure as with onexchange.

Regards,
Laura

NDA needed for:
XUMA
160 Pine Street - #200
San Francisco, CA 94111

|--------+------------------------>
|        |          Robin Hill    |
|        |                        |
|        |          09/12/00 12:37|
|        |          PM            |
|        |                        |
|--------+------------------------>

>----------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                            |
  |      To:     Laura Howenstine/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications    |
  |
cc:                                                                   |
  |      Subject:     RE: NDA(Document link not
converted)                     |

>----------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Here is the NDA.  Please select the "Read Only" option in order to open and
print.  Please print 2 originals for signature so each party has an original
executed NDA, or you may e-mail it to them as long as they follow up with 2
originals.  After the other party executes it, you will need to get an EBS
attorney to initial it before an EBS VP or above can execute it on our behalf.
If you have any questions please call me and please make sure I get an
executed
original back.  Thanks.

(See attached file: onExchange.doc)

Robin L. Hill, Legal Specialist
Enron Broadband Services
1400 Smith, Suite 4545
Houston, Texas 77002
(713)853-3255
(713)646-8537 fax
Robin_Hill@Enron.net

|--------+----------------------->
|        |          Laura        |
|        |          Howenstine   |
|        |                       |
|        |          09/11/00     |
|        |          04:31 PM     |
|        |                       |
|--------+----------------------->

>----------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                            |
  |       To:     Robin Hill/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications         |
  |
cc:                                                                  |
  |       Subject:     RE:
NDA                                                 |

>----------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Hi Robin,

The information that you require for the NDA is in the message below.

Thanks.

Regards,
Laura

----- Forwarded by Laura Howenstine/Enron Communications on 09/11/00 04:33 PM
-----
|--------+----------------------->
|        |          ed@onexchange|
|        |          .com         |
|        |                       |
|        |          09/11/00     |
|        |          02:17 PM     |
|        |                       |
|--------+----------------------->

>----------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                            |
  |       To:     Laura Howenstine/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications   |
  |
cc:                                                                  |
  |       Subject:     RE:
NDA                                                 |

>----------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Hi Laura,

Here's all the info:

Ed Cuoco
onExchange
Reservoir Place
1601 Trapelo Road
Waltham, MA 02451
781.672.3400  x223
781.672.3408  fax
www.onexchange.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Laura_Howenstine@enron.net [mailto:Laura_Howenstine@enron.net]
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000 3:00 PM
To: Ed Cuoco
Subject: NDA

Ed,

I'm sorry to bother you with this, but I have not been able to pull up your
street address on your web site - I get a message that the server is busy.
If
you send me the relevant info on Onexchange, as requested below, I'll send
it on
to our legal department to expedite the NDA.

Thanks.

Regards,
Laura

Laura Howenstine
Manager, Enron Broadband Services
713-853-0308 (office)
713-304-7819 (mobile)
laura_howenstine@enron.net

----- Forwarded by Laura Howenstine/Enron Communications on 09/11/00 01:59
PM
-----
|--------+----------------------->
|        |          Robin Hill   |
|        |                       |
|        |          09/11/00     |
|        |          12:24 PM     |
|        |                       |
|--------+----------------------->

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-|
  |
|
  |       To:     Laura Howenstine/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
|
  |       cc:
|
  |       Subject:     NDA
|

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-|

Laura, please send me the full legal name and address of the company and I
will
draft the NDA for you to forward to the client.  Thanks.

Robin L. Hill, Legal Specialist
Enron Broadband Services
1400 Smith, Suite 4545
Houston, Texas 77002
(713)853-3255
(713)646-8537 fax
Robin_Hill@Enron.net

 - XUMA.doc
 - onExchange.doc


Oliver,

Makes sense to me.

Vince

"Oliver Bennett" <oliver@risk.co.uk> on 04/03/2000 09:49:13 AM
Please respond to "Oliver Bennett" <oliver@risk.co.uk>
To: <Porter1J@kochind.com>, "Vince J Kaminski" <Vince_J_Kaminski@enron.com>,
<rnathan@utilicorp.com>
cc:
Subject: Risk 2000 Panel Discussion, Boston

Just a quick email to start some  discussion about the panel session you are
involved in during Risk2000 in Boston  on 13 & 14 June.
?
Although I would welcome suggestions to the contrary, I would  prefer to go
straight into the discussion rather than have a series of short
presentations first. Ideally I think we should establish a number of topic
areas  around which the moderator can lead the discussion - naturally for the
better  discussions it's important to have varying views on similar subjects;
similarly  it is often interesting to hear the panel's comments on one
individual's more  specific area of knowledge.
?
Conseqently if you could return this email (to all panel  members) with
topics you feel should be covered, any particular areas you would  personally
like to focus on, any proposed changes to the actual panel structure,  and
possibly additonal panel members you think should be there, that would be a
good start. I am still in the process of looking for a moderator and if
anyone  has any suggestions, please let me know.
?
(The talk title is Effectively Applying Weather  Derivatives)
?
Best regards,
?
Oliver?
?
?
Direct: +44 (0)20 7484  9880
?
Risk Publications, 28-29 Haymarket,  London SW1Y 4RX
Fax: +44 (0)20 7484 9800? Email: oliver@risk.co.uk
www.riskpublications.com


Rod, per our discussion recently, I've drafted up some language to be
included in ETS approval authority guidelines in the event that projects
overrun their initially approved amounts:

Once capital projects are approved (whether included in the Plan or not),
spending is limited to the approved level. If a project is projected to
overrun, proper approval authority must be obtained prior to expending or
committing to anything over the approved amount. In no case, can anything be
spent over the approved amount without obtaining additional approval.

To determine the appropriate approval level needed, add the expected overrun
to the originally approved amount. Then go to the appropriate section (ie
projects not approved in the Plan or projects approved in the Plan) and
identify the appropriate approval level for the new total. For example, if a
capital project was approved in the Plan for $1.8MM and it is projected to
overrun by $.2MM, the ETS President can approve the overrun. However, if the
original amount were $1.9MM in the Plan and is expected to overrun by $.2MM,
the ETS President cannot approve. It must go to the GPG CEO. Further, if the
project's new total exceeds the GPG CEO authority, the decision will be made
at that level when and how to obtain approval from Enron's Office of the
Chairman.


I go back for more tests this afternoon.

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 06/05/2001 09:42 AM
To: kay.mann@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Tuesday

What did the doc say?  Are you ok?


---------------------- Forwarded by Kurt Anderson/EWC/Enron on 04/29/2002
04:02 PM ---------------------------

Mark V Walker
01/18/2002 11:17 AM
To: Kurt Anderson/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Danielle Lewis/EWC/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Trent Mesa Report Elements from Oct 2001 to Dec 2001

Executive Summary
The following report incorporates the monthly meter readings by the site
personnel & review of the mon files from Visupro.   In all three months the
project availability ramp up was not attained although the Dec availability
is close.   It should be noted that the Oct 2001 grid availability was
extremely poor and that erratic grid conditions are known to cause turbine
trips associated with grid variations.   This should be less of a problem due
to the DVAR  but the problem may not be eliminated entirely.   In November
2001 the Visupro data recovery was only about 85% and it is possible that
there was higher availability but there is no recorded data to prove it.   In
contrast the data recovery was over 94% in Dec 2001.


Comments:
1. (22/3.11)  I would like to see all of the original spare parts language
added back in.  Engineers are very wary of not having firm spare parts
language and information from the OEMs.  B. Virgo will not sign off on the
deal until he is satisfied with the cost, procurement and amount issues for
spares.

2.  What about keeping the current language from 26/4.3 (h) as well?

3.  Don't understand the concept of an offset in (29/6.3).  Explain to me
tomorrow please.

4.  (36/10.2)  FYI, when I talked to Tony Leo this morning, it is his
understanding that the 3.0 MW standards would not even apply in this P.O.  I
found that to be interesting as I told him the plan from ENA's standpoint was
to build out the BOP and pursue the permitting for a 3.0 MW plant.

5.  (38/10.5.2)  We definitely need the unit-by-unit language in this
section.  It provides much more clarity than "commercially reasonable" does.

Stephen

Kay Mann
11/06/2000 06:55 PM
To: Scott Healy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen Plauche/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: 50 down, 25 left but it is going faster!


Here are some ideas for discussion this  week.??
?
Next week we won't be meeting, and after that we  will have only two meeting
times left before Christmas.? Be thinking about  what you'll want to do as a
group?for the last meeting, since it'll be here  real soon.? Some groups have
a party, with a Chinese gift exchange (why is  it called Chinese?), or some
go to eat somewhere and then go as a group in a van  or suburban to look at
Christmas lights, etc.? If your group doesn't have  some tradition or
enjoyable end to the semester, be imaginative and see if you  can't come up
with something fun to do.? Of course if you need help let me  know!
?
Bobby
 - NEON Roaring 5.doc


Phillip

Here's an advance look at the Central Summary for March GL.  I'll have all
the detail to you later today.

Thanks
Cathy


Bizarre as it sounds, we've now heard that they are calling the Assembly members back.  So it appears that the Assembly leadership will at least make a run at this.  We are getting more information and mobilizing industry.  Some key considerations:

The Governor is putting immense pressure on the Legislature to get something done.
The Legislature is fearful of getting blamed by the Governor for having "done nothing."
Becauase the Assembly has thus far "done nothing," the only thing it has in front of it is 78.
The Assembly could not agree to the Speaker's bill because it felt the bill was too far to the left; but 78 is even more one-sided. So there's a reasonable likelihood that 78 would have to be amended considerably in order to get the support necessary to get voted out.
Once voted out of the Assembly, it would have to go back to the Senate, where the Senate would have to approve it.
Again, the Senate has adjourned, so Burton would have to round them up and call them back for a vote, and there's no indication at this time that Burton's inclined to come back.
In addition, Burton has said that he's not interested in making any changes to 78, that "it's 78 or nothing."  Consequently, for the Sentate (i.e., Burton) to vote it out, it would first have to agree to the Assembly's amendments.  Thus far, the Assembly and the Senate have not seen eye to eye on the issues.
All that said, this Legislature is far from rational, and nothing can be counted out.  We're therefore operating under the assumption that 78 could move.
Will report back as information becomes available.
Best,
Jeff

	"Scott Govenar" <sgovenar@govadv.com> 07/24/2001 05:15 PM Please respond to sgovenar 	   To: "Ban Sharma" <ban.sharma@enron.com>, "David Leboe" <David.Leboe@ENRON.com>, "Eric Letke" <eletke@enron.com>, "Jennifer Thome" <Jennifer.Thome@enron.com>, "Ken Smith" <ken@kdscommunications.com>, "Bev Hansen" <bhansen@lhom.com>, "Hedy Govenar" <hgovenar@govadv.com>, "Miyung Buster" <Miyung.Buster@enron.com>, "Janel Guerrero" <Janel.Guerrero@enron.com>, "Robert Frank" <rfrank@enron.com>, "Mike Day" <MDay@GMSSR.com>, "Leslie Lawner" <Leslie.Lawner@enron.com>, "Harry. Kingerski@enron. com" <Harry.Kingerski@enron.com>, "Karen Denne" <kdenne@enron.com>, "Steven Kean" <Steven.J.Kean@enron.com>, "Alan Comnes" <acomnes@enron.com>, "Susan J Mara" <smara@enron.com>, "Paul Kaufman" <paul.kaufman@enron.com>, "Jeff Dasovich" <jdasovic@enron.com>, "Jim Steffes" <james.d.steffes@enron.com>, "Rick Shapiro" <rshapiro@enron.com>  cc:   Subject: ASSEMBLY SESSION - URGENT

The Assembly is tentatively scheduled to take up SBX2 78 in committee on
Friday.  If the bill passes, it may go straight to the Assembly floor that
night.  The Senate may go in either late Friday or early Monday to take up
the bill as amended although this has not been confirmed.

Amendments to SBX 78 may be available tomorrow.


They don't have to be with the others, so this is perfect.  Thanks, Greg.  If
it's easier, I can come to you...I know you guys are swamped.  SRS

PS - I didn't realize that I sent you an e-mail from Jeff's box - didn't mean
to alarm you if I did!

Greg Grissom
04/05/2000 11:12 AM
To: Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: More tickets for Friday night...

Sherri-

This is not a problem.  I probably can't get them with the other two but they
will be in the same area.  I will bring them up some time this afternoon.
Let me know if you have any questions.  Thanks!

Greg

	From:  Jeff Skilling                           04/05/2000 10:32 AM

Sent by: Sherri Sera
To: Greg Grissom/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: More tickets for Friday night...

Greg, if there are two more tickets available for sale for Friday's game, I'd
like to buy them.  Let me know.  Thanks, SRS


I am taking Good Friday as my discretionary holiday for the year.  I will be
in Austin with my daughter for her official tour and info session at UT, plus
a look at dorms.  Patti will have numbers where I can be reached in Austin.

We are making final changes to the orig presentation today - I will be
reviewing those tomorrow in Austin.  I am e:mailing you a current draft
version, although it does not yet reflect all of the changes needed.  I am
still trying to eliminate some pages to make it more a more manageable size.
I have taken the work that Rahil and Fred have done on the services and have
made that into an appendix - nice work, but way too much detail for a
presentation.


Judge  Birchman's November 23rd Order sets January 8, 2002 as the hearing date for  202(c) issues. As we discussed during the November 20th phone conference, the  witness for the State Water Contractors, Richard Jones, is not available for  cross examination on January 8th. As we agreed during the phone conference, Mr.  Jones will be available during the December hearing dates for cross examination  on the 202(c) issues.

Since he will be traveling in for the hearings we need to set a date within  the December hearings when the cross examination (if any) will take place.   We suggest that he be available on December 21st, the last day of the  December hearings. If anyone prefers that he be available on a different date,  please advise us by the end of the this week (November 30th) so that travel  plans can be made.

Sincerely,

Peter J. Scanlon, Esq.
Duncan, Weinberg, Genzer
   &  Pembroke, P.C.
1615 M Street, NW
Suite 800
Washington, DC   20036
T:  202-467-6370
F:  202-467-6379
E-m:  pjs@dwgp.com


Off what hook?

	Paul Kaufman@ECT
	10/10/2000 11:04 AM

		 To: Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Mona Petrochko
		 cc:
		 Subject: Information re: Commissioner McIntyre

Y'er off the hook, matee.
---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT on 10/10/2000 09:09
AM ---------------------------

Lysa Akin
10/09/2000 02:18 PM
To: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jake Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher F
Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Debra Davidson/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mollie Gustafson/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jessica
Burry/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: Information re: Commissioner McIntyre

I have just been advised by Commissioner McIntyre's office that he will NOT
be traveling to Portland this week.  Subsequently (obviously) he has
cancelled his visit to the trading floor scheduled for Oct. 13th.

We will try and coordinate with the Commissioner's office to arrange a visit
at a later date.

Lysa
---------------------- Forwarded by Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT on 10/09/2000 02:22 PM
---------------------------

Lysa Akin
09/28/2000 01:47 PM
To: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jake Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher F
Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT
cc: Debra Davidson/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mollie Gustafson/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jessica
Burry/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: Information re: Commissioner McIntyre

As you know, I have been working with the Commissioner's office to arrange
for Cmmr. McIntyre
to tour the floor when he is in Portland the 12th & 13th of October.

Just to update you:

The Commr. is unavailable the 12th.  He will be in the office the 13th at
2:00pm
Tim Belden has indicated that he is available the 13th, and I have reserved
Mt. St. Helens in his name at 2:00pm.
Jake Thomas is out of country and cannot attend.
Chris Calger is out of the office the 13th and cannot attend.
Paul Kaufman is out of the office and cannot attend.

Tim, if you would like my assistance in planning the visit, please let me
know!

Lysa
x7927

---------------------- Forwarded by Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT on 09/28/2000 01:37 PM
---------------------------

Lysa Akin
09/28/2000 01:31 PM
To: cmessina@govmail.state.nv.us
cc:
Subject: Directions/Instructions for Portland Trip

Cynthia - Here is a map from the hotel to the office.

From street level, Commissioner McIntyre will need to take the escalator at
Three (3) World Trade Center up to the main entrance.

Inside the double doors is a guard desk.  He needs to sign in and get a Guest
pass.
They will ask him who he is here to see and he should advise Lysa Akin and
give them my extension at 7927.

I will then come down and escort him to the floor.

Lysa Akin
Ass't to Paul Kaufman
503/464-7927


Stephanie:  There's no Municipal deal (remember Friday?).  SS
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 12/04/2000 01:35 PM -----

	Tracy Ngo
	12/04/2000 12:37 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: clark deal went physical

Thanks for being so responsive to the "firedrill"...but it looks like its
going physical.  Tracy


Kevin,

We can meet at 3:00pm in EB1336.  Thanks, Kim.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Howard, Kevin A.
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 6:58 AM
To:	Watson, Kimberly
Subject:	meeting today

Kim:
Rod has asked me to fill in for him at a 9:00 meeting with Stan and Dan.  Can we move this to 10:00?

Thanks,
Kevin


Nothing with or pertaining to Northwest Pipeline to the best of my knowledge.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Jones, Tana
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 1:49 PM
To: Young, Kay
Subject: Northwest Pipeline Company

Any NDAs for referenced company?
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 06/04/2001 01:48 PM -----

	Daniel Diamond/ENRON@enronXgate 06/04/2001 12:57 PM 	   To: Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT  cc: Bob Shults/ENRON@enronXgate  Subject: Stack Manager
Lite, NDA for

Tana,
Please send a bilateral NDA regarding Stack Manager Lite to:

Mr. Ed Brewer
Northwest Pipeline Company
295 Chipeta Way, Mail Stop 3i3
Salt Lake City, UT  84107

email:   ed.r.brewer@williams.com
801-584-6324

Thanks,

Dan


Apparently I forgot to attach the material referred to in this morning's
email. ?My dumb mistake -- daniel----------From: Daniel Casse
<dcasse@whwg.com>Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2001 08:19:00 -0600To: <skean@enron.com>
Cc: <rshapiro@enron.com>, <mpalmer@enron.com>Subject: energy humorSteve --
here is a first crack at some humor based on this week's news from
California.At the end is an idea for a cartoon. ?I thought I should run it by
you before we get our cartoonist working on it.I'm in New York today and
probably will check my email late in the day. ?But I will be checking my
voicemail regularly.Daniel-- Daniel CasseWhite House Writers
Group615-297-5999615-297-5908 (fax)
 - EnergyHumorJan5.DOC


Thanks

I am not quite there I am afraid. Are you saying that the folks outside NY
and London have no autonomy and are merely acting on trading instructions
issued by the London or NY trading desks ? If that is the case:

Why don't NY and London do the deals themselves and let the locals
concentrate on generating business ?
There should be no "Chicago Book" (SCRP) for example
That conflicts with the "envelope" which you mention, which appears to be a
delegated trading authority, in which case we are back to "square one" it
would appear.

Help me out.

DP

To: David Port/Market Risk/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Bjorn Hagelmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ted
Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shona Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron, Mike Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT,
Robert Soeldner/LON/ECT@ECT, Lloyd Fleming/LON/ECT@ECT, Marcelo
Parra/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA, Tim Poullain-Patterson/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Authorised Traders : Montreal & Chicago

David

The set-up for the financial trading is similiar except that the instructions
are relaid by e-mail each night to New York and Tokyo.  Tim Pateman
(authorised trader in London) sends details of positions and instructions on
prices / volumes.

The mail provide directions on pricing (off set basis on EOL) and volumes,
creating an envelope in which they can trade.
They  must call for further instructions if the price shifts by more than $10
($100 for Tin & Nickel)  or the position by more than 100 lots.

Regards
Andy

Tim Poullain-Patterson
09/11/2000 15:27
To: David Port/Market Risk/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Andrew Cornfield/LON/ECT@ECT, Bjorn Hagelmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally
Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shona Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron, Mike
Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT, Robert Soeldner/LON/ECT@ECT, Lloyd Fleming/LON/ECT@ECT,
Marcelo Parra/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA

Subject: Re: Authorised Traders : Montreal & Chicago

David,

The business model you outline is actually the one we are implementing with
one big difference - the Head Trader in London (Sam Hainsworth) calls the
sales person each day to tell him what to do before they speak to any
customers. As you point out, these conversations are recorded so if the sales
person does anything other than what is agreed at the outset of each day,
then they will be red carded.

I refer you back to the memo supplementing the updated list of authorised
traders that I sent out and which Marcelo and Sam have discussed with
Commercial staff in both these offices (Shona and Bjorn have this memo), as
well as Marcelo's operational plan.

Clarification point - when Andy says "internally" he means that Commercial
(Rob Soeldner) is taking a lead in resolving Joe Robertson's concerns.

Regards,
Tim

From:  David Port @ ENRON
        09/11/2000 13:52

To: Andrew Cornfield/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Bjorn Hagelmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ted
Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shona Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron, Mike Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT,
Robert Soeldner/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Poullain-Patterson/LON/ECT@ECT, Lloyd
Fleming/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Authorised Traders : Montreal & Chicago

How about this for a business model for an origination and trading outfit.

salesperson talks to customer
customer agrees to trade
salesperson phones trading desk and gets price (trading desk is London or NY
- NB: all lines are taped)
salesperson tell customer
customers says ok
salesperson says "done" to customer and trading desk
trading desk books deal, middle and back office processes kicks in, sends out
and chases up confirm etc
accounting process identifies value added by salesperson and gives them a
piece of the price as a credit
no bank accounts or signing authority in sales office
no accountants, middle office people or other similar humans in the sales
office, just sales people
all hedging and risk taking resident in trading books in NY or London

Can we not make this work ?
DP

To: Bjorn Hagelmann/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shona
Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron, David Port/Market Risk/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mike
Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT, Robert Soeldner/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim
Poullain-Patterson/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Authorised Traders : Montreal & Chicago

Bjorn

As discussed, given Joe's comments below, a note to confirm that this being
dealt with internally.

Rob Soeldner has made it clear to Joe that:

Enron places great importance on trading controls. These are non-negotiatable.
The suggested course of action is not an option
We aren't seeking to close any of the Agency offices given implemetation of
these controls.

Joe is not in yet - Rob will be discussing with him further when the US gets
in.

Of note - Joe is on the commercial side,  Marcelo Parra who is responsible
for the operational side is fully onboard for the operational changes made.

Regards
Andy

---------------------- Forwarded by Andrew Cornfield/LON/ECT on 09/11/2000
11:07 ---------------------------

Joe Robertson@MGUSA
08/11/2000 20:38
To: Tim Poullain-Patterson/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Andrew Cornfield/LON/ECT@ECT, Lloyd Fleming/LON/ECT@ECT, Marcelo
Parra/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA, Michael Farmer/EU/Enron@ENRON@ECT, Naomi
Connell/LON/ECT@ECT, Robert Soeldner/LON/ECT@ECT, Sam
Hainsworth/EU/Enron@Enron@ECT

Subject: Re: Authorized Traders : Montreal & Chicago

As a practical matter the procedures outlined are not workable. We need to
find a way to go forward that works and can satisfy all concerned.

Either the people in these offices can be entrusted to transact and execute
business or we should consider closing these offices and relocating some of
the people which I do not believe makes any sense at all.

Joseph E. Robertson, Jr.
Enron Metals & Commodity Corp.
520 Madison Avenue
28th Floor
New York, NY 10022
Tel: 212.715.5254
Fax: 212.715-2357
E-mail: joe.robertson@enron.com


Hi Harry,

      I hope you had good weekend.  The weather in College Station (for the Aggie football game) & Austin was beautiful & sunny.  We never saw the rain.

      I am sending you my resume for any contacts you may have within Enron or anyone else in the Industry.  I am very interested in this industry in which I can utilize my communication, interpersonal skills and business experience.  I posses strong leadership, motivation skills and long-term client relations that would be of great value to any organization.  I am adept to working in a fast-pace environment and Team oriented group to reach company and personal objectives.  I am keenly interested in making a strong contribution and commitment to a company in the energy industry and my decision to pursue my goals within energy.  I would appreciate the opportunity to discuss my credentials with you or any contacts you may have in a personal interview.  Please feel free to contact me at your earliest convenience.

      I hope to see you & Nicole this Thursday night around 6:30.  Thank you again for your help.

Deanna Hamrick
713-862-8641


(See attached file: Microsoft 1999 AR.pdf)

+-------------------------------------------------------------+
| This message may contain confidential and/or privileged     |
| information.  If you are not the addressee or authorized to |
| receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy,     |
| disclose or take any action based on this message or any    |
| information herein.  If you have received this message in   |
| error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail |
| and delete this message.  Thank you for your cooperation.   |
+-------------------------------------------------------------+

 - Microsoft 1999 AR.pdf


Mark,

This is the latest draft (Fri afternoon), of the paper by John Martin
from Baylor. Please, review the draft from the point of view of our PR
policy. I shall read it as well.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/02/2001
02:03 PM ---------------------------

"John D. Martin" <J_Martin@baylor.edu> on 02/02/2001 10:59:11 AM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Draft from the editor with questions.  I'll call

Vince,

attached is the editor's latest edits on my draft.  there are a couple of
things i'd like to discuss with you and will call right after lunch.

john

 - 134martin2.doc

John D. Martin
Carr P. Collins Chair in Finance
Finance Department
Baylor University
PO Box 98004
Waco, TX 76798
254-710-4473 (Office)
254-710-1092 (Fax)
J_Martin@Baylor.edu
web:    http://hsb.baylor.edu/html/martinj/home.html


Just FYI: This litigation assessment was requested to support an Enron
guaranty for $16 million to back up a SECLP indemnity as part of a settlement
agreement whereby Foster Wheeler and Raytheon agreed to replace the faulty
boilers at the Puerto Plata plant, in exchange for certain releases from
liability.  Foster Wheeler and Raytheon requested this guaranty because our
SECLP partner, Don Smith, refused to sign the settlement agreement (not
unusual conduct for Don).  This settlement was finally & successfully
concluded last night after years of tedious and protracted negotiation.  We
are pleased to finally have concluded this settlement because the boilers are
currently being held together with paper clips and scotch tape.  Now, we no
longer have to send Richard to the DR to hold them together with his brute
strength which was my back up plan. Call me if you have any questions. 56159
Regards,
Michelle
---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Blaine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
01/10/2001 02:49 PM ---------------------------
From: Rob Walls@ENRON on 01/10/2001 02:33 PM
To: Michelle Blaine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Chip Schneider/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Enron Guaranty

Michelle -

Thanks for the email.  I think you should send a copy to Mark Haedicke and
Bruce Lundstrom (and Richard Sanders?) since they are responsible for the
DR..

	Michelle Blaine@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	01/08/2001 02:12 PM

		 To: Rob Walls/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Chip Schneider/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Enron Guaranty

Rob,    This document is addressed to you and is the litigation group's
analysis supporting the Enron guaranty in connection with the settlement
agreement with Raytheon and Foster Wheeler.  Bob and I actually did the
analysis and drafted this sometime ago and Chip Schneider needs this official
memo today to finalize the guaranty process.  We have discussed this before
and there is nothing you need to do unless you have a question. Call me if
you do.
Regards,
Michelle


Yahoo! News	Edit Breaking News Alerts - Yahoo!

	Breaking News Alert	 edit
SEATTLE _ Boeing announces it is moving headquarters to Chicago.

	 [IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]

If you no longer wish to receive this alert, click here to unsubscribe.
If you have questions, send us feedback.

Copyright , 1994-2001 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved. Yahoo Privacy Policy


Please begin your focus on increasing EOL liquidity as soon as possible.  This is not a long term project.  Lavo will be seeking immediate results.

Thanks,
Mike


Hi Kathleen,

I left a stack of initialled docs on the appointed chair in my office.  If
you will email me Janet's telephone number, I will call and leave a voice
mail about you bringing her the docs to sign.

Thanks,

Kay


You will have several opportunities in the next few days to see a taped
interview with Jeff Skilling on The Players segment of "Business Unusual," a
program that captures the insights of the world's prominent corporate
leaders.  "Business Unusual" will appear on CNN networks in select regions
around the globe.  Jeff will discuss why Enron is destined to be the world's
leading company, developing a culture that rewards change, the principles of
a "loose/tight" organization and more.

Broadcast Schedule:

CNN
Saturday, May 19
11:30 a.m. Pacific Standard Time

Sunday, May 20
5:30 Central Standard Time (a.m. and p.m.)

CNNfn
Monday through Friday, May 21-25
7 p.m. and 10:30 p.m. Central Standard Time

CNN International
Europe:
Saturday, May 19,  1130 CET
Sunday, May 20,  1930 CET

Asia:
Saturday, May 19,  1030 HK

Latin America:
Saturday, May 19,  930 BA
Sunday, May 20,  1030 BA


Please mark your calendars for the first annual ENW All-Employee Meeting at
Jillian's on Thursday, July 19th.  Jillian's is located on I-10 West, just
outside the 610 Loop.  This gathering is intended for all ENW
Houston-based, full-time and part-time employees.

The festivities will begin at 3:00 p.m. and we are considering providing
shuttle transportation from and to the Enron Building for those of you
needing transportation.

We look forward to seeing you there and sharing great food, drink, and
fabulous entertainment!  We will provide additional details when they are
finalized.

Philippe and Greg


Girl, so now you see!  Karen just has issues!  So how are you doing?  I was
on vacation on Friday and didn't get a chance to respond until today.

We were in Chicago this weekend for my husband's family reunion.  The weather
was great compared to Texas.  Texas is so hot!!  How's Christian doing?  My
boys are doing pretty good, just growing so fast.

Tell me more about Karen whenever you get a chance.

See ya!


Parties to the Gas OII PG&E Settlement:

Last week, on June 13th, PG&E held a workshop to discuss proposed tariffs to
implement the Comprehensive PG&E Settlement Agreement resolving all issues
concerning PG&E in the Gas Strategy Investigation at the CPUC.  At that
meeting, parties raised various issues concerning the draft tariffs we had
previously distributed, and we promised we would write up and provide the
parties with a list of these issues.  That list is attached.

Also attached is a schedule of next steps, including dates for PG&E to
provide responses to the issues raised at the tariff workshop, and for the
parties to provide further comments.  We have also decided to hold two
additional meetings to discuss tariff issues.  These are:

June 30, Friday, 10:00 a.m., Room 301b, 77 Beale St., SF
PG&E Hosts Half-Day Workshop on Metering Issues

July 6, Thursday,  1:30 p.m., Room 301b, 77 Beale St., SF
PG&E Hosts Half-Day Tariff Workshop on any Unresolved Issues

Thanks for all your help in finalizing these tariffs.

> Ron Stoner     Randy Litteneker
> (415) 973-3606    (415) 973-2179
>
>
>
 <<June 13th issues.doc>>  <<OII Tariff Schedule for Parties.doc>>

 - June 13th issues.doc
 - OII Tariff Schedule for Parties.doc


CONFIDENTIAL - DO NOT DISTRIBUTE

Please let Steve Kean know if you have any changes.


Let me see what I can do.  I can't believe you haven't gotten any kind of
notice.

I still need your credit card information for the phone bill.

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	05/31/2001 09:03 AM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Yes, they are deducting for parking

How do I get on the list for the form?  Could you pretty please check for me?

Thanks,

Kay


No, I told Sharon Probably.  I make sure Yes's never come out of my mouth.  I might just get locked in if I do.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Murray, Bill" <BillM@HammondsHomes.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Murray+2C+20Bill+22+20+3CBillM+40HammondsHomes+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, May 03, 2001 9:40 AM
To:	Bill Murray (E-mail); Chris Ferguson (E-mail); Chris Hatcher (E-mail); Williams, Jason; Mike Morrison (E-mail); Rhonda & Von Jones (E-mail); Scott Walton (E-mail); Todd Perry (E-mail)
Subject:	Dominos

Jason,

The following replied to my original e-mail:

- Ferg: Pretty sure, gotta check with my wife.
- Hatcher: I am up for playing.
- Scott: I might be.  I need to talk to Kathy about it first.
- Von: see you then
- Jason: no e-mail reply, but his assumed answer is, "I don't reply until
the very latest possible time so that I have an opportunity to look at all
of my options and chose the one that matches my interest that particular
day, hour, or minute." :-)  Actually, Jason told Sharon that he was in last
night, but he may change his mind after that dig.
- Mike: out
- Todd: out

We definitely have three (Von, Jason, and me).  If all of the maybes come
(Ferg, Hatcher, & Scott), we will have six.  Please confirm if you can make
it tonight.

Thanks,
- Bub

-----Original Message-----
From: Williams, Jason [mailto:Jason.Williams@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 9:12 AM
To: "Bill <billm (E-mail)
Subject:

Do we have enough guys tonight to have a game?


Please open the attached file to read the complete text of the following
items:

06:40AM EST 12-DEC-00 UBS WARBURG (US) (YOUNG, DON) SUNW NTAP
SUN MICROSYSTEMS: CAUTIOUS NEAR-TERM

08:33AM EST 12-DEC-00 BOFA MONTGOMERY (KING, KURTIS R) SUNW
SUNW: SUNW CHANNEL CHECKS COMING IN NEGATIVE; DOWNGRADING TO BUY

00:20AM EST 12-DEC-00 MERRILL LYNCH (S.MILUNOVICH) CSCO
TECH STRATEGY:MORE AGGRESSIVE SHORT TERM

08:23AM EST 12-DEC-00 PRUDENTIAL SECURITIES (H.MOSESMANN) AMD INTC
AMD:  DOWNSIDE PRE-ANNOUCEMENT.  NOT A SURPRISE.

 <<12.12.00 Analyst Reports.doc>>

The analyst reports provided are reports prepared by independent analysts
who monitor and track Compaq's performance.  These reports are not prepared
by or at the direction of Compaq and as a result, Compaq is not endorsing or
verifying the information contained in these reports or endorsing any of
these analysts.   These reports are being provided solely for business
reasons and as a result, do not distribute these reports to other
individuals outside of Compaq.  If other individuals are interested in
receiving the reports provided herein, please contact Elizabeth Davis in
Compaq's Investor Relations Department at elizabeth.davis@compaq.com.

Elizabeth Davis
Compaq - Investor Relations
Research Analyst
281-518-4289

 - 12.12.00 Analyst Reports.doc


unable to attend at that time due to a prior appointment,  I can meet with you individually later some time

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Doucet, Dawn
Sent:	Monday, July 16, 2001 4:22 PM
To:	Bardal, Chelsea; Cooke, Ian; Del Moral, Joseph; Dunsmore, Paul; Lalani, Sean; Loy, Brian; Taylor, Fabian; Law, Michael; Macphee, Mike; Rodger, Paul; Sangermano, Nick
Cc:	Milnthorp, Rob; Le Dain, Eric; Davies, Derek; Devries, Paul; Kitagawa, Kyle; Zufferli, John
Subject:	FREE LUNCH!

OK, now that I've got your attention - I really am offering free lunch!  I would like to informally get together with you on Wednesday, July 18 at 11:45 am - 1:00 pm (max) to talk about your recruiting experience with Enron Canada.  We're gearing up for our 2001/02 recruiting campaign and we think your experience will help us define what works best and what can be improved in our process.

For those of you in Toronto, I apologize for not being able to schedule this over your lunch time!  However, if you can wait til 2:00pm to eat, go ahead and grab something and expense it!  We'll hook you guys in by videoconference.

I've booked Videoconference Room # 1.  Please let me know whether or not you can attend so I can order enough food.  Thanks!!


Commentary: Things Get Even Worse in  California
Although it hardly seems possible, the California  wholesale electric market
is getting worse. And rapidly. Power prices are high  across the board and
the California Independent System Operator has taken to  declaring
simultaneous stage one and stage two emergencies every morning, right  along
with brewing the morning coffee.
On Thursday afternoon, the ISO  declared the first stage three emergency,
although it was not necessary to  implement rolling blackouts. Demand hit
31,600 MW during the day, far from a  peak for the state. But planned and
unplanned outages meant that the statewide  capacity margin was a bare 1,000
MW.
The chief culprit appears to be the  state's price caps, which are driving
generation out of the state, and the  politicians appear poised to make
matters worse. The caps combine with soaring  natural gas prices to drive
electricity out of the California market. Because of  gas prices in the $7
per million Btu range, the price caps are simply not  enforceable. They are,
in short, a joke.
With price caps of $250/MWh in place  through the California Power Exchange,
and with bids hitting the caps for every  hour of the market, generators are
fleeing the state. That's because prices in  the Pacific Northwest are
running in the neighborhood of $375/MWh, and  generators are selling into
Oregon and Washington instead of California.
Dow  Jones reports that utilities in the Northwest last week showed up as
buyers in  the Cal PX, buying power at $400/MWh -- $250/MWh for the juice and
$150/MWh for  transportation.
Just how wacky has the California market become? In order to  protect
reliability, the Cal ISO has been quietly purchasing power in bilateral
deals from out-of-state generators at prices above the cap. The price cap
rules  apparently allow the ISO to buy above the cap if needed to supply an
emergency.  But it can only buy from out-of-state companies, not the
California  generators.
Last Wednesday, the ISO paid some $10 million to buy 1,000 MW --  most likely
from BC Hydro, although the ISO isn't talking -- or about $900/MWh.  Los
Angeles Department of Water and Power, sitting in the catbird seat with
excess capacity, sold the ISO some 1,200 MW at the capped rate of $250/MWh.
A  civil suit charges that LADWP has been -- shock! -- profiteering by
selling its  low-cost juice from Bonneville Power Administration into the
California market  at an order of magnitude above what it paid.
How are the state's politicians  responding? They don't seem to understand
the short-term consequences of what is  going on. They are talking about
banning exports of power made in California  (can you say "Commerce
Clause"?), or forming a state power agency (not in this  decade), or
re-regulating the utilities (ditto).
There is only one action  that California can take to protect itself against
blackouts this winter. The  state must get rid of the price caps entirely.
Immediately.
California's  choice is simple and stark. Does the state want to ensure that
its citizens have  not enough power at an artificially low price, or enough
power at a politically  unpopular high price? The need for power trumps the
price issue.


Thanks, Lisa.  I appreciate it.  John was asking me to call you and Aleck.

Rosalee

Lisa Assaf@ECT
04/02/2001 10:37 AM
To: Kenneth Lay/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Summary

As per your request, I attach a copy of the summary with the latest changes.
This is the copy which was sent to Mr. Lavorato and his assistant.

Regards,
Lisa
per: Aleck Dadson


Presentations from the Enron all-employee meeting on Feb. 21 and the Enron
Investor Conference on Jan. 25 are now available in the Image Center's
Presentation Library.

Click here to go to the Image Center web site.


-----Original Message-----
From: Grace, Rebecca M.
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 9:44 AM
To: Thomas, Paul D.
Cc: Cashion, Jim; Allen, Thresa A.; May, Tom
Subject: RE: Current Enron TCC Portfolio

Paul,

I reviewed NY's list.  I agree with all of their contracts numbers and mw amounts.

Call if you have any more questions.

Rebecca

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Thomas, Paul D.
Sent:	Monday, December 17, 2001 9:08 AM
To:	Grace, Rebecca M.
Subject:	FW: Current Enron TCC Portfolio

 << File: enrontccs.xls >>
Rebecca,
Let me know if you see any differences.

Paul
X 3-0403
-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas, Paul D.
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 9:04 AM
To: Ahmed, Naveed
Subject: FW: Current Enron TCC Portfolio

-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas, Paul D.
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 10:01 AM
To: Baughman, Edward D.
Subject: Current Enron TCC Portfolio


Please note this upcoming event at the Commonwealth Club
595 Market Street, 2nd floor
Reception at 5:15pm, Program at 6pm
$7 for members, $10 for non-members

For more details or to register, see http://www.commonwealthclub.org
(anyone here help set this up?)

JEFFREY K. SKILLING | THURSDAY JUNE 21
CEO, Enron Corporation

CALIFORNIA,S POWER CRISIS:
THE ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE ENERGY INDUSTRY

California is facing a profound energy crisis, and the state,s Democratic
governor is placing the blame square on the shoulders of the federal
government and energy producers such as Enron ) dubbed by CBS News as George
W. Bush,s &largest lifetime donor.8 Do out-of-state energy producers have a
responsibility to rate payers in California? Should tax payers cover the
outstanding debt to companies like Enron incurred by the now-bankrupt PG&E?
Will Enron turn off California,s juice if the money stops flowing


Mark and Steve,

I have previously forwarded to you the Gramm changes that I received from Ken
Raisler.  I recognise that we want to be extremely cautious about suggesting
that we support any of the changes.  Nonetheless, it may be worthwhile going
through the changes to see if they are beneficial to Enron.

For example, the changes being made to solve the "Blackbird Issue" (see p. 29
and 30 of Gramm's changes) seem to be beneficial for Enron Online.  Also,
Gramm's Swap exclusion language of section 107 seems broader than the
existing language.

If Gramm were to ask Ken Lay if we were supportive of these changes how would
we respond?  I have a hunch our response is that a perfect bill would be
ideal, but it is not likely that such a goal is attainable in this Congress
or the next Congress.  Nonetheless, I would appreciate help listing the
changes that are helpful to enron and those we just don't care about.

Tom


Here is the January file.  If you have any questions feel free to give me a
call.

Robin
x57478


Thanks for the information on the GB 58. This boat far exceeds what I want.
After the show I concluded that  either a 42 or 46 foot classic is most
appropriate for my needs. Would like to also consider the 36 foot model.
Thanks for the info though and keep me in mind. I enjoyed talking to you at
the boat show and my wife was quite sold on the GB line (after looking at
most everything there in detail).

As I mentioned I am in no particular rush as I probably have a year before I
want to go forward on this but if something exciting came up, either new or
used, I may be interested. Again, I would need your help in obtaining
appropriate dockage( in someone's backyard!)

Thanks, Rick Buy


Agree. I doubt that the process will be completed by the 11th knowing how
legal works anyway.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  McKinney, Lara
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 3:18 AM
To: Denny, Jennifer; Taylor, Mark; Jones, Tana
Cc: Puthigai, Savita; Moorer, Torrey; Aziz, Arfan
Subject: RE: FYI - this is something you may want to get your arms around

Please note that Arfan and I have already been made authorised signatories
for the following Enron entities:
Enron Power Operations Limited
Enron Australia Finance Pty Ltd
EnronOnline LLC

On Amita's removal as signatory, can we wait until the 11th June?  She will
be heading up the London Product Control Group until then.

Regards,
Lara

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Denny, Jennifer
Sent: 23 May 2001 22:39
To: Taylor, Mark; Jones, Tana
Cc: Puthigai, Savita; McKinney, Lara; Moorer, Torrey
Subject: FW: FYI - this is something you may want to get your arms around

Mark/Tana,

Due to the recent organizational changes with Sheri Thomas & Amita Gosalia
(see memo below), we will need to remove them as "agents and
attorneys-in-fact to execute Password Applications on behalf of EOL" and add
Savita Puthigai, Lara McKinney and myself.

Also, Dale Neuner should be removed as he is no longer part of EnronOnline
operations but is responsible for DealBench and CommodityLogic operations.
Savita suggested we also add Torrey Moorer since I will be out on maternity
leave in mid July and he will be backing me up during that time.

Can you let me know the turnaround time of a change like this?
Also, is it separate documentation for North America and Europe?

Thank you for your help.
Jennifer
3-5824

To better leverage intellectual capital across Enron Net Works, we have
several organizational announcements to share with you:

Sally Beck, Tom Gros and Beth Perlman will work together to direct our
efforts to &commercialize8 our mid and back office services.  They will
report to the ENW Office of the Chair.  Sally will continue to lead the
day-to-day operations of our mid & back office.  In addition to leading the
development and marketing of Commodity Logic, Tom will have primary
responsibility for the marketing of our mid & back office services.  Beth
will continue to lead IT development for the Americas, including Commodity
Logic and all other systems necessary to deliver mid & back office services.
Joining Tom,s marketing team are Sheri Thomas, Frank Davis, Andrea Crump,
Jeff Harbert and Fred Philipson.

The EnronOnline Product Control function, currently reporting to Sheri
Thomas, will fold into EnronOnline Operations.  Savita Puthigai will lead the
combined group, which will have responsibility for all non-IT day-to-day
operations.  Sheri will move to the mid & back office commercialization
effort reporting to Tom Gros.  Jennifer Denny will assume Sheri,s
responsibilities as the lead for product control.

Amita Gosalia, director of EnronOnline Europe Support, has accepted a new
position with EBS in London.  With her departure, Lara Fields will assume
responsibility for the EnronOnline support team in Europe and report to
Savita.  Paul Goddard will continue to lead our marketing efforts in Europe
and report directly to Andy Zipper, who will continue to lead all of
EnronOnline,s activities.  Angela Connelly will continue to manage
EnronOnline,s content in Europe and report to Kal Shah.  Additionally, John
Pavetto, John Cummings, John Allario, Mike Haney and Jake Staffel will join
Andy,s team to focus on origination opportunities around the EnronOnline
application.

Rex Shelby and David Berberian will focus on special initiatives and new
business opportunities.  Brandon Wax will manage ENW,s investment portfolio.
Mark S. Palmer will lead the Transaction Development and Structuring team.
In their new roles, Rex, Brandon and Mark will report to the ENW Office of
the Chair.

Please join us in congratulating everyone on their new responsibilities and
thank you for your continued support as we position ENW for the future.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Puthigai, Savita
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 8:02 AM
To: Denny, Jennifer
Subject: RE: FYI - this is something you may want to get your arms around

Will do.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Denny, Jennifer
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 5:49 PM
To: Puthigai, Savita
Cc: Lees, Lisa
Subject: FW: FYI - this is something you may want to get your arms around
Importance: High

Savita,
I think Lara, myself & you need to be added to this and others removed.
This is for PAs which are in Lisa's group.
Do you want to speak with Sheri & Legal (Mark Taylor, Tana Jones)?

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Neuner, Dale
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 5:21 PM
To: Denny, Jennifer
Subject: FYI - this is something you may want to get your arms around
Importance: High

The Unanimous Written Consent of Managers of EnronOnline, LLC dated 11-06-00,
effective as of 10-11-00, appoints Amita Gosalia, Dale Neuner and Sheri
Thomas as agents and attorneys-in-fact to execute Password Applications on
behalf of EOL.  This resolution will expire one year from the date of its
effectiveness.  When executing, these signatories must sign as &Agent and
Attorney-in-fact8.

Dale Neuner, Manager
Product Control Groups
CommodityLogic; DealBench


FYI, Miquel has decided to not pursue anything with in my group.. He did say that he was still considering yours.. Good luck... I did tell him that we were hopefull that he would stay within ENA wholesale...

BT


I spoke with George today about whether Enron would be amenable to
discussing settlement with Sempra and putting the facilities to work on a
"going forward" basis while continuing the fight over past breaches. George
said that we would be interested but this interest was subject to the
following general caveats: (1) We would like the facilities moved to one of
the sites we are currently trying to get permitted which would be more
convenient for us, and (2) we want to renegotiate certain portions of the
contracts to reflect today's market situation. For example, the current risk
apportionment and price would have to be modified.
 With that in mind, do you have any thoughts about the most effective way to
facilitate these discussions?  The last settlement effort was pretty useless
and I think we should try to avoid having Holmes and Gittomer sitting
opposite from George and Wayne with Goldstein and I in the background looking
for cover. What do you think about a mediation or otherwise getting a third
party involved? In the alternative, would it be a good idea to involve you
and Mel?
 On a slightly related note, I agree that we probably need to get a
mitigation letter out but I don't necessarily want to send the one we had
been discussing.  Perhaps something that makes clear that they have a
continuing duty to mitigate and then discusses getting together to try to
resolve things?  Can you take a shot at it and get back to me? Thanks in
advance.

From:  Brownfeld, Gail
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 11:32 AM
To: Mcclellan, George; Gregory A. Markel (E-mail); Mcgowan, Kevin; Reck,
Daniel; Arnold, Matthew; Gresham, Wayne
Cc: Sanders, Richard
Subject: Sempra Litigation/Conversation with Michael Goldstein

 Michael Goldstein called this morning to discuss the way forward in light of
the Rev. Proc. and its recent amendment.  After apologizing for being tardy
in returning my calls, he explained that, in his opinion, the tax advice that
we received evidences a fundamental misunderstanding of the situation.
First, he stated that he has been advised that the Rev. Proc. does not apply
retroactively and that although it requires a new PLR to make changes going
forward, it will have no impact on activities which occurred prior to its
issuance and, therefore, has no impact on whether synfuel created before the
Rev. Proc. qualifies for the tax credit.
 He also noted that, to determine the capacity issue, one needs to look at
what could have been produced by the facilities as of the "in- service" date.
This level of capacity is the benchmark for what can be produced. According
to Goldstein, the level of production at Somerset was well below the capacity
on the "in-service" date and, therefore, their proposed modifications to the
facilities would not have increased the capacity in any way inconsistent with
the intent of the Rev. Proc.  When asked what he believed to be the rated
capacity of the facilities on their "in-service" date, Michael didn't know.
He has agreed to find this number and get back to me.
 After I explained my understanding of the effect of the Rev. Proc., Michael
kindly suggested that we consider talking to Price Monford (sp?) at VE who he
considers to be one of the inner circle of tax experts familiar with Section
29 and the discussions with the Service and the Treasury Department about
it.  I told him that we had consulted with our own experts and I didn't know
if this fellow was one of them.  He said that he had not talked to Price and
had no idea what he would advise.
 Goldstein stated on several occasions that he thought the Rev. Proc. would
serve as a great facilitator to get the parties talking again in order to
mitigate damages.  He stated further that he was actually looking forward to
teeing up the remaining machine at Pier IX and, even, moving the second
machine back to Virginia.  When asked what was happening with the machine at
Pier IX, he indicated that it remains idle because they can't get a source of
coal for it. I told Goldstein that I would visit with the "Coal Guys" about
whether there was a way that we could continue to work together in light of
everything that has happened.  He said that he didn't think this was going to
be a problem since once things were up and running, there wouldn't be much
occasion for the parties to have sufficient contact to yield a problem.  I
suggested that if there was a way forward, we needed to make sure the parties
were on the same page about the Production Test, coal size, etc. and even
suggested a modified dispute resolution process should issues arise during
the course of performance. I think that Sempra is amenable to an trying to
reach an agreement going forward but I expect that absent a mediation or
something extraordinary, we will end up fighting about November through the
date of any deal going forward. Please note that I made clear that I had no
idea whether Enron wanted to have anything to do with Sempra on this deal
outside the courthouse but that I would inquire.  I told him my personal view
was that, no matter how strong we felt our case was, I would always listen to
a settlement plan if they had one.
 Finally, I told him I'd get with you guys and call him later today or
tomorrow so that he'd know whether it was worth having any additional
discussions. Please give me call when you get a chance.  It might be a good
idea to set up a call later this afternoon if you are available.


This $27,880 will be subtracted from tomorrows wire(Tuesday 1/22/02).  This amount reflects the
$250,000 prepay from last Friday(1/18/02) for the power purchased on Monday(MLK 1/21/02) for delivery Tuesday.


Hi, Kristin.  Your Dad asked me to write you and suggest that the two of you
meet for lunch tomorrow at Grotto on Westheimer at 1:00 p.m.  They don't take
reservations, but the lunch crowd should have cleared out by that time.  Let
me know if that's ok with you or if you decide not to drive and need him to
pick you up.

Have a good time.  SRS


Mona,

Following up on our earlier conversation, I believe you had someone call
Jot Condie with the California Restaurant Association regarding his San
Diego members.  Unfortunately, with all of the mayhem surrounding the
final weeks of session, Jot misplaced that person's name and number.

Jot called me again today to apologize for losing the information and to
say that his members are still concerned about the energy situation in
San Diego.  Some are so upset with SDG&E that they would like to switch
to a new ESP now.  Jot would like to arrange a meeting with an Enron
representative and some of his San Diego members to discuss options,
including but not limited to, aggregation.  He can be reached at (916)
431-2724.

Thank you again for your help with this.

Scott


Team Enron -  I spoke with Lisa this morning regarding her comments to the GE
language, the substance of which follows. I  can discuss this on the call
with GE, but I wanted the Enron participants to know what our issues are.

1) Assignment  - Generally, if GE is going to require that we list all the
possible assignees, the list should be broad enough to encompass the
possibilities.  The comments below are designed to help make the language as
broad and flexible as possible.  It would be best if we did not have to list
them.

 A. 22.2(iii) and (iv) -  we need to make sure that the definition of
"Facility" will be generic enough to cover any facility, not merely the
one(s) which may be the subject of the particular agreement - also generally
we will need to vet any defined term used in our sections to make sure it
does not result in greater restriction than we planned ;

 B. I think we can remove the bracket before 22.2 (iii)(2) and add
"Purchaser" to the list of folks who can agree to "convey a power plant
project."  Also in that clause, we will need to confirm required "timing" of
some power plant project development - does it mean only at the time of
signing the agreement?  It should be for any power plant project in
development either at the time of signing the agreement, or any project in
development in the future.   Insert the number 3 before the last "and" in
22.2(iii);

 C. The paragraph following 22.2(iv)(c) has references to "(v) and (vi)"
above, which are no longer in the list;

 D. The bold and bracketed language indicates that the terms of each of the
"Facility Agreements" should be in "strict conformity" with the Ts and Cs of
"this Agreement."   Although it is written in the context that there has been
an assignment, Lisa wants to make sure that there is no expectation on GE's
part that an Enron entity will necessarily remain as the "Agent."  Also, the
language indicates that the assignee and the vendor will enter into an
indemnity provision in the Facility Agreement that is in accordance with
Exhibit E  (last sentence).  Does this still work given that the indemnity
now runs only to the Purchaser?

2) Limitation of Liability - 27.2 and 27.3  We may need to explain to the
Enron accountants and AA that the reference to "indemnity" in these sections
does not create a separate indemnity obligation on Enron's or WLB's part.

3) Is the phrase "cognizant government" in 20.2(b) meant to apply to a
governing body with jurisdiction over the Seller and/or Purchaser?

Thanks,

Rose


Ryan,

Good to hear things are going well. I am still with Enron but I am in the
process of moving to Houston. I'm going down there to trade electricity so
that should be interesting change from nat gas. No wife. No house. No liver.
That's about it. Hope India was a good time.

Keep in touch!

Chris

Chris.Dorland@enron.com

(ps Any idea where Nav is?)


This deal terminates effective 3/31/2000.  FYI - all BUG terminate effective
3/31/200.

Brenda H Fletcher
03/20/2000 03:05 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Gloria G Barkowsky/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Theresa Franklin/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: CNG

Chris do you know when this deal # should terminate?
Thanks,
BF
---------------------- Forwarded by Brenda H Fletcher/HOU/ECT on 03/20/2000
03:02 PM ---------------------------

Gloria G Barkowsky
03/20/2000 02:55 PM
To: Molly LaFuze/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda H Fletcher/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Theresa
Franklin/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: CNG

CNG deal #81247 has a demand fee until 03/31/00, and it should not.
Can you please correct this.  Please let me know.  Thanks, Gloria 3-7118


Thanks Gerald.

-----Original Message-----
From: Nemec, Gerald
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 10:59 AM
To: Greenberg, Mark
Cc: Thorne, Judy; Grass, John
Subject: FW: IntercontinentalExchange, LLC
Importance: High

Mark,  Could you please review the attached.  The documents are for access to a commodities and derivative products online exchange.  ENA Upstream Company, LLC is the Enron entity needing access.  The last directive I received it that all these types of documents for trading platforms needed to be reviewed by you.  Let me know if I am mistaken.  Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Thorne, Judy
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 10:06 AM
To: Nemec, Gerald
Cc: Hodge, Jeffrey T.
Subject: FW: IntercontinentalExchange, LLC
Importance: High

Gerald,

Can you please take a look at the attached agreement. Kathy Kelly is trying to get set up on this system to get better trading information. Let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Judy

-----Original Message-----
From: Kelly, Katherine L.
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 10:03 AM
To: Thorne, Judy
Subject: FW: IntercontinentalExchange, LLC

Judy,

Can you please have either Jeff Hodge or Gerald Nemec take a look at this ASAP.  I would like to get us hooked up on this as quickly as possible.  Meaning 2 weeks ago.

Thanks,

Kathy

-----Original Message-----
From: Grass, John
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 9:44 AM
To: Kelly, Katherine L.
Subject: FW: IntercontinentalExchange, LLC

Please have Jeff Hodge review this agreement for Natural Gas.  This is one of our top priorities.

-----Original Message-----
From: Duuna Richardson [mailto:duuna.richardson@intcx.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 2:45 PM
To: 'jgrass@enron.com'
Cc: Pam Anderson; Pete Van Winkle
Subject: IntercontinentalExchange, LLC

Dear John,

Per Pam Anderson of Intercontinental, attached is some additional
information about The ICE.

First, is an electronically executed copy of our Participant Agreement
signed by each customer and second, our Service and Pricing Schedules.  If
you have any questions,  please call Chuck Vice  at 770.738.2129.  If not,
you may execute(and also state which name needs to appear on the system) and
return a copy to Pete Van Winkle's attention at the address below at your
earliest convenience.

Thank you for your interest.

Regards,

Duuna Richardson
IntercontinentalExchange, LLC
2100 RiverEdge Parkway, Suite 500
Atlanta, GA  30328
Tel:    770.738.2137
Fax:   770.951.5481
---------------------------------------------------

 <<Participant Agreement 080200.doc>>  <<Service and Pricing Schedules.doc>>


I am sorry for the delay however, my comments are with my attorney.  I will
try to get back with you this week.

Regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Thanks Mark--we'll take a look at this information and be ready to discuss
with you guys.  I'll take the lead on getting a new meeting set up.  DF

Mark Knippa@ECT
02/05/2001 05:28 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, James
Centilli/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron

Subject: Gallup Station - Demand Rebate

Hey Drew,

Sorry that we did not get to meet last week when you were in town.  I have
pulled up some information on the project performance and wanted to share
with the group.  I was very concerned by the comment that the project was on
a rate to cost TW an additional $1.0 million for the year because the demand
avoidance program was not in place.  I do want to confirm that Arnold
Eisenstein at ET&S working on the development of the programming to support
TW's efforts to minimize demand expenses.  It was my understanding during the
development of this project, that TW was targeting a 75% avoidance for an
annual basis.   I offer the following details regarding the actual operation
of the station in 2000.

Peak load for 12,000 hp = 9,621 kw x 3 = 28,864.0 kw per Quarter

Actual Utilization
   3rd Quarter 2000      % of Max  4th Quarter 2000  % of Max
 kw - generation   22,684.8      78.6   17,779       61.6
 kw - transmission 25,421.0      88.1   22,992       79.6

 Target $'s @ 75% 99,142      75.0            73,480      75.0
 Net Actual Rebate  $'s 75,935        78.6                105,181        61.59
  difference            ($23,206)                  $31,702

Overall net for 2000 under Rate 21 appears to reflect that TW has saved
$8,496 above their target rebate of $170,622 (75% avoidance) for the 3rd and
4th quarters.  In addition, ECS has made payment to TW under Rate 19 that
resulted in an additional $118,441 paid to TW.   Note that ECS has proposed
to included the transmission demand in the Rebate process which is not
specifically addressed the Compression Service Agreement.

Currently TW has access to the web site that graphically displays the current
Tri-State generation load as well as several years of month by month
history.  This access was conveyed to TW as soon as the confidentiality
agreement between TW, ECS and Tri-State was executed and delivered to ECS.
At this point, EE&CC (now under ET&S) was notified that the system access was
available to package the load monitoring programming.  As I mentioned above,
that effort is underway.

I will be glad to meet and/or discuss these issues when you are available.  I
will be travelling most of the next (2) weeks but you can reach me via email
or my
cell phone (713) 851-7703.   Based on the information that I was able to pull
together, I just don't see the magnitude of dollars that seems to have TW
concerned.
I would like to discuss at your earliest convenience.

Thanks,
mk


Not really.  It was a format agreed to for all the LM's because the intent in
most cases is to sell the project (and the equipment), and the terms in the
override letter only apply when the equipment is in the financing structure.

Kay

Lisa Alfaro@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
12/21/2000 04:31 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Override letter

Kay, was this letter necessary b/c accounting rules did not allow us to have
these items in the Purchase Agreement?


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Dronet, David
Sent:	Tuesday, May 29, 2001 2:32 PM
To:	Huble, Amanda
Subject:	FW: add user to Web_GasFundyBanned: Complete (lb)

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Information Risk Management,
Sent:	Tuesday, May 29, 2001 2:28 PM
To:	Dronet, David
Subject:	Re: add user to Web_GasFundyBanned: Complete (lb)

Access granted.

Thanks,
Leola

From:	David Dronet/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/29/2001 02:23 PM
To:	Information Risk Management/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	add user to Web_GasFundyBanned

Please add the user

	Cary Carrabine

to the group Web_GasFundyBanned

Thanks,

David Dronet


Here are first Devon numbers for Nov.  Will advise you for changes.

Bev
---------------------- Forwarded by Beverly Beaty/HOU/ECT on 10/20/2000 03:26
PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Steve Holmes" <Steve.Holmes@dvn.com>
10/20/2000 02:49 PM

To: <Beverly.Beaty@enron.com>
cc: "Cynthia Cantrell" <Cynthia.Cantrell@dvn.com>
Subject: November Availabilities

Attached are the estimated availabilities for Devon Energy Production
Company, L.C.  I will pass along any revised numbers as we receive them.
Please let me know of any questions you may have.

Thanks,
Steve

 - EnronAvails1100.xls


FYI,

I will be taking a day of vacation Friday 2/8. Also North Branch unit #3 is back available and running today.
Becki, can you or Doug cover me on the Minneapolis Call tomorrow?

Thanks

Jerry


Yes,

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Forster, David
Sent:	Friday, September 14, 2001 8:23 AM
To:	Tycholiz, Barry
Subject:	RE: Origination Track Meeting

Yes; Monday at 10:00.

Will you be able to make that time?

Dave

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tycholiz, Barry
Sent:	Friday, September 14, 2001 8:20 AM
To:	Forster, David
Subject:	RE: Origination Track Meeting

Dave. is this the meeting time on monday?

BT

 -----Original Appointment-----
From: 	Rode, Tina   On Behalf Of Forster, David
Sent:	Wednesday, September 12, 2001 2:50 PM
To:	Luce, Laura; Tycholiz, Barry; Vickers, Frank W.; Lagrasta, Fred; Redmond, Brian; Baughman, Edward D.; Lemmons Jr., Billy; Bland Jr., Ted C.
Subject:	Updated: Origination Track Meeting
When:	Monday, September 17, 2001 10:00 AM-11:00 AM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where:	EB3530


Pursuant to your request, attached is a draft letter to WiseSoft, Inc.
regarding Hennadiy Batrak.


Westinghouse has agreed that LJM doesn't need to sign it.  I sent SW a letter
confirming that agreement.  Lynn tells me that they should sign it soon.
Otherwise, the agreement is fully executed.

ckm

From: Stuart Zisman@ECT on 02/28/2001 03:13 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Don Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject:

Kay,

What is the status of the Westinghouse settlement letter?  I thought that it
had been fully executed but Mitch Robinson indicated that he thought that LJM
still needed to sign.  In any case, Allegheny Energy's attorney has requested
a copy of the letter that Westinghouse was obligated to send (regarding our
ability to increase the maximum output at the Wheatland facility without
affecting the warranties) pursuant to paragraph 3 of the letter.  Please
advise ASAP.

Stuart


Transfer.  Section 7 is hereby amended by adding the following Subsection (c):
 "(c)  Party A may transfer its rights and obligations under this Agreement,
in whole but not in part, to any Affiliate so long as the obligations of such
Affiliate are guaranteed by Enron Corp. pursuant to a guaranty substantially
similar to the one provided on behalf of Party A, provided that such transfer
will not give rise to a Termination Event or an Event of Default."

Rod and I will follow up on the Letter of Credit issues.  Have a nice
weekend.  Regards.  Sara


You have received this email because you are listed as a security approver.
Please click
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000009842&Page=
Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000009842
Request Create Date : 12/11/00 11:44:19 AM
Requested For       : anabella.desouza@enron.com
Resource Name       : EOL US Backoffice  Product Data Manager
Resource Type       : Applications


Please let me know if you would like to see any additional infromation.


The NYISO is reserving hours beginning 11:00, 14:00, and 16:00 in the
February 7, 2002 Real-Time Market.

Prices in the February 8, 2002 Day-Ahead Market are correct.

This e-mail information is a copy of the official posting which can be
found at the following address of our website:
http://mis.nyiso.com/public/htm/OperMessages/CurrentOperMessages.htm#mm

---
You are currently subscribed to nyiso_tie as: benjamin.rogers@enron.com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-nyiso_tie-628650Q@lyris.nyiso.com


Gerald,

Here is the unprofitabilty Clause Wildhorse put in their proposed revised
San Arroyo contract to us.

3.01 Notwithstanding anything contained in this Agreement to the contrary,
if, in the sole opinion of Gatherer, the continued operation of Gatherer's
Gathering systems, or any portion thereof, or the providing of Gathering
Services hereunder, becomes unprofitable or uneconomical to Gatherer, for
whatever reasons, then Gatherer shall have the right to terminate this
Agreement upon thirty (30) Days advance written notice to Shipper.

Ken


you don't even have a 3rd receiver, johnson is out with a bum hamstring

Phillip M Love
08/29/2000 08:31 AM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: QB

I am sorry, you are right...you always try and help me out.  I feel better
about my receivers than yours.
PL


----- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 10/20/2000 11:49 AM -----

	Frank Sayre@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	10/19/2000 06:38 PM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Monthly Report - Caribbean

I know this is a bit longer than you usually get from your reports, but I
thought I would give you a more detailed report to begin the transition. Hope
this is ok.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Prukop, Tammy
Sent:	Thursday, June 14, 2001 4:24 PM
To:	Cashion, Jim
Subject:	FW: Houston Flood

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Susie McCormick" <susiemccormick@ev1.net>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Susie+20McCormick+22+20+3Csusiemccormick+40ev1+2Enet+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, June 14, 2001 4:10 PM
To:	Allan Noonan, Jr; Andrea Newman; Angela Womack; Ann Artzer; Annie & Gary Glaspy; Anthony Carrillo; Bill Wischmeyer; Bobby Hill; Bryan Hood; Cecilia Richards-Cifone; Cindy Lempar; Colleen Brown; Dale Emshoff; dkrause@alliedconsultants.com; Doris Herzog; Eileen Godeaux; Glenn Elkins \(home\); Janell McCormick; Jerry & Debbie Both; Kathleen Sullivan; Kathy Wimbish at Ilcor; Linda Alford; Liz Johnson; Marian Shelton; Paul & Susan Fowler; Prukop, Tammy; Tommy Noonan; Tommy \(Chase\) Noonan
Cc:	Susie McCormick; Susan McCormick
Subject:	Houston Flood

FYI......This is the life of a Houstonite!  Please note the attached is  a
Power Point slide.  After you open it, click anywhere on the page to
continue with  the show.  There are several pictures to view that Tim
received from another Chevron-Phillips employee.

susie mc

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mccormick, Timothy" <mccortp@cpchem.com>
To: "'Home'" <timm@ev1.net>
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 2:23 PM
Subject: FW: Houston Flood

>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Garner, Jennifer
> > Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 1:20 PM
> > To: Bledsoe, Wesley; Sackey, Benjamin; DeLeon, Sally; Farinetti, Dennis;
> > Galvez, Elias V; Isom, Willie; Hickox, Marty R; Hutchison, Steven;
Ilger,
> > James D; Kelly, Stephen; Lovell, Jacqueline A; Flowers, Sonya L; Smith,
> > Paula; Meurer, David; Marcucci, Angel Jose; Mccormick, Timothy; Moore,
> > Wayne; Noyes, Frederick W; Potter, Bill W; Rios, Ray; Stern, Donald
> > Subject: Houston Flood
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Luna, Andrea
> > Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 1:06 PM
> > Subject: Houston Flood
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Email: John.A.Ramirez@aexp.com
> > <<TS_Allison_Houston_devastation.pps>>
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

 - TS_Allison_Houston_devastation.pps


GRIFFITH, JOHN H,

You have been selected to participate in the Mid Year 2001 Performance Management process.  Your feedback plays an important role in the process, and your participation is critical to the success of Enron's Performance Management goals.

To complete a request for feedback, access PEP at http://pep.enron.com and select Complete Feedback from the Main Menu.  You may begin providing feedback immediately and are requested to have all feedback forms completed by Friday, May 25, 2001.

If you have any questions regarding PEP or your responsibility in the process, please contact the PEP Help Desk at:
Houston:  1.713.853.4777, Option 4 or email: perfmgmt@enron.com
London:  44.207.783.4040, Option 4 or email: pep.enquiries@enron.com

Thank you for your participation in this important process.

The following is a CUMULATIVE list of employee feedback requests with a status of "OPEN."  Once you have submitted or declined an employee's request for feedback, their name will no longer appear on this list.  NOTE: YOU WILL RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE EACH TIME YOU ARE SELECTED AS A REVIEWER.

Employee Name:
BAJWA, BILAL
CAVAZOS, AMELIA
GUPTA, SANJEEV
HUAN, XIAOJUN
HUSAIN, KARIMA
ISSLER, PAULO
MAGGI, MICHAEL
MAYEUX, DAVID
MCLAUGHLIN, JR., ERROL
PEREZ, AGUSTIN
QUIGLEY, HENRY
SHIPOS, JENNIFER
SMITH, MARK
TANG, SHOUAN
TAYLOR, JOSEPH


Per my conv. w/Carol St. Clair, Crestar commented on the ETA, but never
requested that their comments be formalized as an amendment.  Per our
understanding, they have not requested a signed amendment and opened the
counterparty w/o any changes, so we have not pursued them.

	David Forster@ENRON
	07/05/2000 05:01 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Crestar Energy Inc.

Tana,

Can you confirm the status of the amendment with Crestar?

Thanks,

Dave
---------------------- Forwarded by David Forster/Corp/Enron on 07/05/2000
05:01 PM ---------------------------
From: Lisa Lees@ECT on 07/05/2000 10:25 AM
To: David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Crestar Energy Inc.

Dave,

I spoke with Carol St. Clair last week who told me that the ETA has been
worked out with Crestar.  Would you please confirm that for me before I call
them.

Thanks.

Lisa