COLUMBIA GULF TRANSMISSION COMPANY
                        NOTICE TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES
                                OCTOBER 05, 2001

Notice ID: 3159
5 - NO RESPONSE REQUIRED

                   COLUMBIA GULF TRANSMISSION COMPANY
                               OPEN SEASON

Overview

Columbia Gulf hereby provides notice that it is conducting an open season to
determine whether there is demand for additional firm transportation on its
mainline under Rate Schedule FTS-1.

Purpose of the Open Season

Columbia Gulf is conducting this open season to comply with a Stipulation and
Consent Agreement approved by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)
in Docket No. CP93-736.  Under the FERC orders, Columbia Gulf must hold an open
season to gauge the demand for firm mainline transportation service on Columbia
Gulf by entities that were firm sales customers of Columbia Gas Transmission
Corporation at the time of Order No. 636 restructuring (October 31, 1993).

Details

* The open season period begins at 5 p.m. Central Time on October 5, 2001 and
ends at 5 p.m. Central Time on November 4, 2001.

* ELIGIBLE PARTICIPANTS IN THE OPEN SEASON ARE LIMITED TO ENTITIES WHO WERE
FIRM SALES CUSTOMERS OF COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION CORPORATION ON OCTOBER 31,
1993.

* To indicate interest in firm mainline transportation capacity on Columbia
Gulf, a prospective shipper must complete, execute and return the attached Open
Season Response form.  All signed Open Season Response forms must be received
by Columbia Gulf no later than 5 p.m. on November 4, 2001.  They may be sent to
Columbia Gulf by mail, overnight delivery service or facsimile (at
713-267-4249).  A faxed form must be followed by the mailing of an executed
original to Columbia Gulf.  Forms sent by mail or overnight delivery service
should be addressed to:

Columbia Gulf Transmission Company
2603  Augusta, Suite 125
Houston, TX  77057
Attention:  Customer Services

* Please note that terms of service shall be 5 years minimum (consistent with
Columbia Gulf's minimum term for its Mainline '99 open season), and such term
shall commence no earlier than October 9, 2003 (consistent with Section IV(E)
of the FERC Stipulation and Consent Agreement).

* Columbia Gulf is not obligated to construct facilities to satisfy any
interest in capacity expressed during this open season.

* Arranging for upstream or downstream transportation is the sole
responsibility of the shipper.

                         OPEN SEASON RESPONSE FORM

Name of Responding Company:___________________________________

Primary Contract Term (check one):

_______ 5 years
_______ Greater than 5 years (please fill in number of years here:_______)

Maximum Daily Quantity (Dth/day):______________

Receipt Point: Rayne, LA, MLI # 2700010  Delivery Point: Leach, KY, MLI # 801

Service Commencement Date:____________________

Please verify, by signing below, that your company was a firm sales customer of
Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation on October 31, 1993, and that you are
submitting this Open Season Response form with the knowledge and approval of
your company's senior management.

__________________________________
   Signature

Name of Individual Whose Signature Appears Above:

      _____________________________

Title:_____________________________

Mailing Address:

_________________________________

_________________________________

Delivery (or Street) Address, if different:

_________________________________

_________________________________

Telephone Number:__________________________

Fax:______________________

E-Mail Address:__________________________


Sounds good.  Where / when?

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Per the source there are no Dart files available for December 25th &
26th.

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Dbnotes
> Sent:	Wednesday, December 26, 2001 2:05 PM
> To:	#FACS/DATA
> Subject:	 #FACS/DATA  DELAY IN DART DATA FOR DECEMBER 26TH, 2001
>
> Due to delivery issue from the DART U.K. office there will be a delay
> in the DART data for 12/26/01.   The data will be banked as soon as
> possible.  We apologize for any inconvenience.  The following
> instruments are provided by DART:
>
> Cross Currency Basis Spreads
> Interest Rate FRA's
> Interest Rate Option Volatilies
> Interest Rate Swaps
> Interest Rate Swaption Volatilities
> Zero Coupon Rates
>


Team Turbineb,

Number one priority is the amendment to the two letter agreements.  We are
also trying to get the ABB and GE facility agreements finalized so they can
be tendered to Intergen today.

Meanwhile, on the TurboPark front I am revising the relevant documents so the
drafts can be sent to the banks today.  Once the assignment and assumption
agreement form is approved, it will need to be signed by GE.  This doesn't
have to be done today.

We are also trying to get both the GE and ABB acknowledgement letters signed
today.

Carolyn, have the escrow agreements been fully executed?

Kay


A bit lengthy, but I think it looks fine.

Peggy Mahoney@EES
08/30/2000 12:41 PM
To: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paula Rieker/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cedric
Burgher/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Elizabeth Tilney/HOU/EES@EES, Harold G
Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Mark S Muller/HOU/EES@EES,
Kevin Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, NotesAdmin/EES@EES, Marty
Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Bill Rapp/HOU/EES@EES, Rob
Rice/HOU/EES@EES, Wendy Raleigh/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Karen S Owens@ees@EES, Thomas E White/HOU/EES@EES

Subject: Starwood Draft

Attached is a draft of the Starwood press release with our initial changes in
red.
Please review and let me know your thoughts by end of day Thursday, Aug 31.

It is clear that Starwood has several agendas with this release and, after
talking with
them, they would prefer not to cut any of their messages.  Scheduled release
date is
Tuesday, Sept 5.  Please feel free to call me to discuss.

Also - I've attached a map of all their US owned, franchised and leased
property locations.
87 of the properties are owned and there are approx. 400 total in the US.


In conversations with GE, it is their understanding that their guaranty will
not be transmitted until there is a fed ref number tomorrow.  The opinion
letter will be faxed as soon as the GC is available, or Kent can sign for Dan
Rowley if that is acceptable.  DRowley can sign originals on Thursday.

The LOC is in the works, and GE understands that 10% will be retained in
escrow until the LOC is delivered.

There will be three original opinions.  There is one original guaranty, and
I'm not certain of GE's willingness to give more than that.  Obviously, there
will be only one LOC.

Kay


Thanks for the update.


Ami,

Please attend this.

D
---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 02/02/2000
10:40 AM ---------------------------

Tricia Bowen
02/02/2000 10:18 AM
To: George Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: KERR MCGEE meeting TODAY @ 1:30 - room 30C1

I wanted to let you know about this meeting in case you wanted any of your
schedulers to attend.
Thanks
Tricia
---------------------- Forwarded by Tricia Bowen/HOU/ECT on 02/02/2000 10:15
AM ---------------------------

Tricia Bowen
02/02/2000 09:51 AM
To: Joan Quick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Wardle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L
Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia Franklin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Molly
LaFuze/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clarissa Garcia/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip
Villagomez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cindy Vachuska/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christina
Sanchez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joan
Veselack/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jesse
Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe A Casas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rhonda
Dempsey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sabra L Dinari/HOU/ECT@ECT, Briant
Baker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Meredith Mitchell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victoria
Versen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anita K Patton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beverly Beaty/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: KERR MCGEE meeting TODAY @ 1:30 - room 30C1

If you currently have any Kerr McGee production on your pipe, please plan to
attend the meeting today in room 30C1 at 1:30.
This should be a very quick meeting.  We will be discussing everyone's roles
and responsibilities in maintaining the Kerr McGee tickets in Sitara.

I realize we are dealing with numerous cuts and renoms during the day, but if
at all possible, please try to attend.  We need to clarify some issue
immediately to avoid confusion in the future.

Thanks
Tricia
3-4222


Oops!  Forgot to attach!

---------------------- Forwarded by Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT on 07/14/2000
11:51 AM ---------------------------

Shirley Crenshaw
07/14/2000 11:53 AM
To: Vasant Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Grant
Masson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amitava Dhar/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Maureen
Raymond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Kindall/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin G
Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Osman Sezgen/HOU/EES@EES, Elena Chilkina/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: 7-1-00 to 7-15-00 Off Duty and Overtime Report

Attached is the off duty and overtime that was reported to me for the above
pay period.  You are the only ones in our group that had these reported.

Please review and if there is an error, please let me know by next Monday
the 17th and I can correct it.  Otherwise, we cannot correct it until the
next pay
period.

Thanks!

Shirley


FYI...   -Craig

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  <David.Briggs@XCELENERGY.COM>
Date: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:07:21 GMT
Subject:

November 15, 2001

ATTENTION ALL PLANT OPERATORS , SHIPPERS AND NOMINATING AGENTS:

IMBALANCE PAYBACK GAS AND/OR OVER-DELIVERY RESTRICTION UPDATE

Due to continuing warm weather and operational issues, PSCo's restriction on imbalance payback gas and/or over-deliveries into the system will remain in affect until further notice.  In order to avoid the need for upcoming weekday and/or weekend OBP's, it is critical that Shippers, Nominating Agents and Plant Operators do not schedule imbalance payback gas or deliver more than confirmed nominations during this period.

Plant Operators should restrict deliveries to confirmed nominations ONLY during this restricted period.  If over-deliveries become a problem, PSCo will activate flow control valves on any plants involved.

Shippers/Nominating Agents should not nominate any imbalance payback gas to PSCo for the duration of the restriction.  Any imbalance gas remaining on the system for this period will be cut to -0- by PSCo.  Thank you in advance for your cooperation.

Sincerely,

Monica Nedbalski
Senior Transportation Specialist
(303) 571-7886

David Briggs - Xcel Energy
Project Administrator
Certified Web Designer
Phone: (303) 571-7812
     Fax: (303) 571-7001
 Email: David.Briggs@Xcelenergy.Com <mailto:David.Briggs@XCELENERGY.COM>

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  <David.Briggs@XCELENERGY.COM>
Date: Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:07:33 GMT
Subject:

November 15, 2001

ATTENTION ALL PLANT OPERATORS, SHIPPERS AND NOMINATING AGENTS:

THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY SCHEDULING DEADLINES

The following scheduling deadlines will be in place for the upcoming Thanksgiving Holiday (which includes Friday, November 23):

Nominations for Thursday, November 22 through Monday, November 26

Via fax due by 10:30 AM (MST) Tuesday, November 20.
Via EBB due by 10:30 AM (MST) Wednesday, November 21.

Nominations for Tuesday, November 27

Via fax due by 10:30 AM (MST) Wednesday, November 21.
Via EBB due by 10:30 AM (MST) Monday, November 26 (back to regular nomination schedule).

In order to confirm/schedule transportation volumes in a timely manner, PSCo must enforce these deadlines.  If you have any questions regarding this schedule, please contact your Transportation Specialist.  Thank you in advance for your cooperation.

Monica Nedbalski
Senior Transportation Specialist
(303)571-7886

David Briggs - Xcel Energy
Project Administrator
Certified Web Designer
Phone: (303) 571-7812
     Fax: (303) 571-7001
 Email: David.Briggs@Xcelenergy.Com <mailto:David.Briggs@XCELENERGY.COM>


Everyone,

Enron has just launched an effort to educate California businesses on the
California energy crisis, engage them in the debate, and coordinate our
efforts in working toward "real solutions".  A direct mail piece was sent out
on Monday from Ken Lay.  The materials that were sent are attached below.

There will be follow up with the businesses that we have targeted.  We also
intend to make contact with non-business organizations in the coming weeks.

PLEASE NOTE:  The letters reference a California website that we have set up
for businesses to receive additional information.  DO NOT GO TO THIS SITE AS
WE ARE TRACKING THE NUMBER OF HITS WE RECEIVE AND WE DON'T WANT A SKEWED
NUMBER DUE TO ENRON EMPLOYEE HITS.

If you have questions, please feel free to call me at 3-9104.
Thanks!

We also enclosed Ken Lay's San Francisco Chronicle op-ed (March 1st), and the
Wall Street Journal article on the economic impact of the energy crisis
(March 8th).


Hi Andy,

I like to thank you for meeting with me last Monday regarding the PRC review.
 Attached please find a copy of my resume and a separate file describing the
Deals/Project that I have worked on and a brief description on my job
functions/duties related to each of them.  ENA -  Generation Investments is a
great group with some exceptionally smart people.  It is however, unfortunate
that often times one does not get recognized and appreciated for all his hard
work. There is certainly a lack of communication between the Associates and
the VP/Head of the Group and one,s performance is analyzed and communicated
to the VP only through the Directors.  I hope you will consider these issues
when evaluating my performance.  If you have any question please let me know.

Thanks!

Aamir Maniar
Associate


OK for me!

	Stephanie Sever
	01/04/2001 05:03 PM

		 To: Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba
Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Canadian Financial Power Profile

Tom,

Per our conversation, it is my understanding that we will copy profiles for
US East Power Fin Swap to the new Canadian Financial Power Product.

Please respond.

Thank you,
Stephanie


Dave,

Congratulations. Well deserved.

Vince


Let's take the opportunity.

Cynthia Sandherr@ENRON
07/19/2000 06:32 PM

To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re: Hearing

Steve:  per your voicemail, we do not have a date yet but should have it
before Congress leaves next Friday.  I'll let you know as soon as it is set.
As you can see, I disagree with Mark per the attached e-mail I sent him
earlier today.  I do not think it should be Jeff Skilling.  Mark does not
appear to concur with me.  Perhaps I should go ahead and express our interest
to testify and then we can have a conversation with the team to decide who
should do it.  I was just trying to not waste a chit and ask for a spot if we
had no interest.  We can determine who and what later.  So, before I ask the
Committee, we DO want to testify, correct?
---------------------- Forwarded by Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron on 07/19/2000
07:28 PM ---------------------------

Cynthia Sandherr
07/19/2000 12:00 PM

To: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Hearing

Mark:  I disagree.  The field hearings are not as high profile as a D.C.
hearing.  Further, we can wait to see who PG&E sends and others.  Likely the
California utilities will send their CEO's so if we need to be on the same
panel with them we would need to send Jeff Skilling.  But, tactically, we may
not wish to do this?  Otherwise, we can go for a technical person or for
someone like Steve Kean......this will be for local press and politicals more
so than federal (I doubt that more than 4-6 Congressional members even
show.)  Again, we have not been asked to testify.  I was just trying to
ascertain if we were interested to be asked.......let me know  your further
thoughts.  thanks.

Mark Palmer
07/19/2000 11:54 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES
cc: Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Sandra
McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Joe
Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paul Kaufman@EES, Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES,
James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, mpalmer@enron.com@EES

Subject: Re: Hearing

I believe it's a Jeff Skilling level event.


Teco Tap       20.000 / Enron ; 91.667 / HPL IFERC

LS HPL LSK IC       20.000 / Enron


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 09/26/2000
04:26 PM ---------------------------

"George Richards" <cbpres@austin.rr.com> on 09/26/2000 01:18:45 PM
Please respond to <cbpres@austin.rr.com>
To: "Phillip Allen" <pallen@enron.com>
cc: "Larry Lewter" <retwell@mail.sanmarcos.net>, "Claudia L. Crocker"
<clclegal2@aol.com>
Subject: Investment Structure

STRUCTURE:
Typically the structure is a limited partnership with a corporate (or LLC)
general partner.  The General Partner owns 1% of the project and carries the
liability of construction.

LAND OWNERSHIP & LOANS
The property would be purchased in the name of the limited partnership and
any land loans, land improvements loans and construction loans would be in
the name of the limited partnership.  Each of the individual investors and
all of the principals in Creekside would also personally guarantee the
loans.  If the investor(s) do not sign on the loans, this generally means
that a larger amount of cash is required and the investor's share of profits
is reduced.

All loans for residential construction, that are intended for re-sale, are
full recourse loans.  If we are pursuing multifamily rental developments,
the construction loans are still full recourse but the mortgage can often be
non-recourse.

USE OF INITIAL INVESTMENT
The initial investment is used for land deposit, engineering &
architectural design, soils tests, surveys, filing fees, legal fees for
organization and condominium association formation,  and appraisals.  Unlike
many real estate investment programs, none of the funds are used for fees to
Creekside Builders, LLC.  These professional expenses will be incurred over
the estimated 6 month design and approval period.

EARLY LAND COSTS
The $4,000 per month costs listed in the cash flow as part of land cost
represent the extension fees due to the seller for up to 4 months of
extensions on closing.  As an alternative, we can close into a land loan at
probably 70% of appraised value.  With a land value equal to the purchase
price of $680,000 this would mean a land loan of $476,000 with estimated
monthly interest payments of $3,966, given a 10% annual interest rate, plus
approximately 1.25% of the loan amount for closing costs and loan fees.

EQUITY AT IMPROVEMENT LOAN
Once the site plan is approved by the City of Austin, the City will require
the development entity to post funds for fiscal improvements, referred to as
the "fiscals".  This cost represents a bond for the completion of
improvements that COA considers vital and these funds are released once the
improvements have been completed and accepted by COA.  This release will be
for 90% of the cost with the remaining 10% released one year after
completion.  Releases can be granted once every 90 days and you should
expect that the release would occur 6 months after the start of lot
improvement construction.  These fiscals are usually posted in cash or an
irrevocable letter of credit.  As such, they have to be counted as a
development cost, even though they are not spent.  Because they are not
spent no interest is charged on these funds.

The lot improvement loan is typically 75% of the appraised value of a
finished lot, which I suspect will be at least $20,000 and potentially as
high as $25,000.  This would produce a loan amount of  $15,000 on $20,000
per lot.  With estimated per lot improvement costs of $9,000, 'fiscals' at
$2,000 and the land cost at $8,000 , total improved lot cost is $19,000
which means $0 to $4,000 per lot in total equity.  The investment prior to
obtaining the improvement loan would count towards any equity requirement
provided it was for direct costs.  Thus, the additional equity for the
improvement loan would be $0-$184,000.   Even if the maximum loan would
cover all costs, it is unlikely the bank would allow reimbursement of funds
spent. The higher estimates of equity investments are shown in the
preliminary proforma to be on the safe side.  The engineer is preparing a
tentative site layout with an initial evaluation of the phasing, which can
significantly reduce the cash equity requirement.

Phasing works as follows.  If the first phase was say 40 units, the total
lot improvement cost might average $31,000 per lot.   Of this, probably
$13,000 would be for improvements and $19,000 for the land cost.  The
improvements are higher to cover large one time up front costs for design
costs, the entry road, water treatment costs, perimeter fencing and
landscaping, and so on, as well as for 100% of the land.  The land loan for
undeveloped lots would be 70% of the appraised raw lot value, which I would
estimate as $10,000 per lot for a loan value of $7,000 per lot.  Then the
loan value for each improved lot would be $15,000 per lot.  This would give
you a total loan of $992,000, total cost of $1,232,645 for equity required
of $241,000.  This was not presented in the initial analysis as the phasing
is depended on a more careful assessment by the Civil Engineer as the
separate phases must each be able to stand on its own from a utility
standpoint.

CONSTRUCTION LOANS
There are three types of  construction loans.  First, is a speculative
(spec) loan that is taken out prior to any pre-sales activity.  Second,  is
a construction loan for a pre-sold unit, but the loan remains in the
builder/developers name.  Third, is a pre-sold unit with the construction
loan in the name of the buyer.  We expect to have up to 8 spec loans to
start the project and expect all other loans to be pre-sold units with loans
in the name of the builder/developer.  We do not expect to have any
construction loans in the name of the buyers, as such loans are too
difficult to manage and please new buyers unfamiliar with the process.

Spec loans will be for 70% to 75% of value and construction loans for
pre-sold units, if the construction loan is from the mortgage lender,  will
be from 80% to 95% of value.

DISBURSEMENTS
Disbursements will be handled by the General Partner to cover current and
near term third party costs, then to necessary reserves, then to priority
payments and then to the partners per the agreement.  The General Partner
will contract with Creekside Builders, LLC to construct the units and the
fee to CB will include a construction management and overhead fee equal to
15% of the direct hard cost excluding land, financing and sales costs.
These fees are the only monies to Creekside, Larry Lewter or myself prior to
calculation of profit, except for a) direct reimbursement for partnership
expenses and b) direct payment to CB for any subcontractor costs that it has
to perform.  For example, if CB cannot find a good trim carpenter sub, or
cannot find enough trim carpenters, etc., and it decides to undertake this
function, it will charge the partnership the same fee it was able to obtain
from third parties and will disclose those cases to the partnership.
Finally, CB will receive a fee for the use of any of its equipment if it is
used in lieu of leasing equipment from others.  At present CB does not own
any significant equipment, but it is considering the purchase of a sky track
to facilitate and speed up framing, cornice, roofing and drywall spreading.

REPORTING
We are more than willing to provide reports to track expenses vs. plan.
What did you have in mind?  I would like to use some form of internet based
reporting.

BOOKKEEPING
I am not sure what you are referring to by the question, "Bookkeeping
procedures to record actual expenses?"  Please expand.

INVESTOR INPUT
We are glad to have the investor's input on design and materials.  As always
the question will be who has final say if there is disagreement, but in my
experience I have always been able to reach consensus. As you, and I presume
Keith, want to be involved to learn as much as possible we would make every
effort to be accommodating.

CREEKSIDE PROCEEDURES
CB procedures for dealing with subs, vendors and professionals is not as
formal as your question indicates.  In the EXTREMELY tight labor market
obtaining 3 bids for each labor trade is not feasible.  For the professional
subs we use those with whom we have developed a previous rapport.  Finally,
for vendors they are constantly shopped.

PRE-SELECTED PROFESSIONALS, SUBS AND VENDORS
Yes there are many different subs that have been identified and I can
provide these if you are interested.

I know I have not answered everything, but this is a starting point.  Call
when you have reviewed and we can discuss further.

Sincerely,

George Richards
President, Creekside Builders, LLC

 - winmail.dat


Either week is good for me, but lunch is better.....I finished shredding weeks ago.
DG

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	SSCHROED@us.ca-indosuez.com@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, January 09, 2002 10:27 AM
To:	dgiron@enron.com; randy.g.kruger.jr@arthuranderson.com; mikeshaw@andrews-kurth.com; todd.w.taylor@bakernet.com
Subject:	Lunch

OK you slackers (excluding Shaw), I'll give you another chance to respond.
Lunch this week or next, let me know what's good.  If meeting after work is
better for you, let me know.  Certainly all of you can stop shredding
documents for 5 minutes to respond.

Schroeder


My sentiments exactly!
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jones, Tana
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 3:45 PM
To:	Radous, Paul; Heard, Marie
Subject:	RE: Ummmmmm

We appreciate all Credit does for us!
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Radous, Paul
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 3:44 PM
To:	Heard, Marie; Jones, Tana
Subject:	Ummmmmm

Thanks for the treat this afternoon.  We appreciate it!


Steve -

As we discussed, please find attached the final draft of the "talking points"
for the Call with Governor Gray Davis.

Thanks,

Joseph Alamo
Government Affairs
San Francisco CA


Week of Jan. 4 - 7th

No Issues with Y2K @ any Enron Office Facilities
Gary Fitch to Europe to negotiate with Litton (fixed base operator that will
crew and maintain our London based Hawker)
Working on setting up Azurix to be partial owner/lessee of all seven aircraft
in our fleet.  Considering charging Azurix cost of 3rd party legal expenses
related to transactions.
Had 29 laptop computers stolen from EB and 3AC in 1999.  Working with IT
groups on tracking techniques however everything discussed appears too
intrusive.
Added $600K of spend to our minority sourcing efforts (all Houston copy paper
now purchased and delivered through minority firm - Lee Office Supply)
ECI has moved into EB level 44 this weekend.  All looks good.
Terry Thorn will consolidate his staff onto level 21 of 3AC (former EI
executive floor).  Minor renovation is planned to improve density.  Kurt
Huneke's group is anxious for Terry's group to get off of 3AC level 15 so he
can expand.
We had our highest volume of meals ever served in the Energizer last Tuesday
(1st day back of new year)
EES is asking that we move Accounts Payable out of the Enron Building (on EB
level 12) so they can take over space.  EES would also like Accounts Payable
to move to 600 Jefferson to help mitigate their lease obligations.  I've
placed call into Rick Causey to get his thoughts.  Have not heard back.
ECI is interested in setting up a NOC (network operations center) @ Ardmore
Facility.  They'll need 1/2 of the available space.  Working with Corp. IT to
determine feasibility and facility cost sharing.
Meeting this week with Drayton McClane and Astros management to finalise
business points regarding construction of a Garage at Enron Field.


Please come down to ECN305 and exchange your parking pass, make sure you bring your current Co# & RC#'s for your application.


The Commodity Fundamentals website is back in service.  Please use the link provided below to access the website:

http://fundamentals.netco.enron.com/main.asp

Thank you,

Amanda Rybarski
Gas Fundamentals
Office: (713) 853-4384
Fax: (713) 646-8453
Pager: (877) 482-0772
Cell: (713) 560-0934


Your participation and  expertise in high profile visits makes a valuable contribution to the Enron experience.  To help you manage your time with these visits and to ensure the experienceENRON process works efficiently, we ask that Jennifer Brockwell and myself be your single point of contact for scheduling your tours.     Our thorough screening process helps ensures these guests receive access to the right areas, the right subject matter experts (SME's) and the highest quality of service.

If you are contacted from someone other than Jennifer and myself (or the chairman's office) to conduct a tour, we recommend you let the person know you are happy to help but experienceENRON manages the tour schedule and refer them to Jennifer Brockwell ext. 57358 or Carrie Robert ext. 33522.

Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you
Carrie
Manager, Enron Corp
713-853-3522
http://experience.enron.com


FYI

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 08/28/2000
12:12 PM ---------------------------

Rabi De <rabide@yahoo.com> on 08/28/2000 11:14:03 AM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: Follow-up interview on 8/21/00

Dear Vince,

Thank you very much for updating me on the status of my job application.? I
got another good news last week.? I am happy to inform you I passed the 2000
CFA Level I examination. The pass rate for Level I examination this year is
52%. I look forward to hearing from you.

Sincerely,

Rabi De

?

?

? Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com wrote:

Rabi,

Thanks for your message.
Everybody who interviewed you was greatly impressed with your technical
skills and professional attitude.

We shall extend an offer to you within a day or two.

Vince

Rabi Deon 08/22/2000 02:57:37 PM

To: Vince Kaminsky
cc:
Subject: Follow-up interview on 8/21/00

Dear Dr. Kaminsky:

Thank you very much for arranging the follow-up interview with your
internal clients. I visited Mr. Ted Murphy and his staff at RAC and Mr.
Dennis Benevides at EES yesterday. I was impressed with level of risk
technology employed by Enron to achieve its business objectives. I want to
reiterate my strong interest in joining your group, which is held in very
high esteem both inside and outside of Enron.? I look forward to h! earing
from you.

Sincerely,

Rabi S. De

Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere!

Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere!


---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 01/24/2001 07:12
AM ---------------------------

SOblander@carrfut.com on 01/24/2001 06:25:43 AM
To: soblander@carrfut.com
cc:
Subject: daily charts and matrices as hot links 1/24

The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  , 2000 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Crude     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/crude13.pdf
Natural Gas     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/ngas13.pdf
Distillate     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hoil13.pdf
Unleaded     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/unlded13.pdf

Nat Gas Strip Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/Stripmatrix13.pdf
Nat Gas Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixNG13.pdf

Crude and Products Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixCL13.pdf

Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606  USA
Tel:  312-368-6149
Fax:  312-368-2281
soblander@carrfut.com
http://www.carrfut.com


I think we should restrict Peter's memo's to 50 words or less.  Please
advise.  Lavo.
---------------------- Forwarded by John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron on 06/22/2000
05:49 PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources
	Canada Corp.

	From:  Peter Keohane @ ECT                           06/22/2000 01:05 PM

Sent by: Nella Cappelletto@ECT
To: Derek Davies/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T
Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Hemstock/CAL/ECT@ECT, Mark Powell/CAL/ECT@ECT

Subject: Alberta Power Purchase Arrangement Auction

I have considered on a preliminary basis the potential use of a limited
liability subsidiary of Enron Canada Corp. for the purposes of bidding on the
PPAs.  The issues and preliminary answers are in summary the following:

1. It is not clear that Alberta would permit qualification of another Enron
Canada entity at this point.  I believe that it would be more sellable if
that Enron Canada entity was a replacement to Enron Canada as a Qualified
Bidder, rather than an additional Qualified Bidder, and if that Enron Canada
entity was similarly guaranteed by Enron Corp.  I need to discuss this matter
further with Rob Hemstock, Alberta and Charles River.

2. With respect to the Enron Corp. Guarantee, as mentioned, it is not free
from doubt, but I believe that the Guarantee is only in respect of bidding
on, and paying for a PPA and not for ongoing performance or payment
obligations under the PPA.  In other words, the Guarantee guarantees
"Obligations" which relate to the bidding process and not to the PPAs
themselves, although there is some wording which could be viewed as including
in "Obligations" ongoing obligations with respect to the PPAs themselves.

3. With respect to limiting liability, such Enron Canada entity would limit
exposure for a successfully acquired PPA to the contributed capital to such
Enron Canada entity, assuming the Enron Corp. Guarantee would not extend past
the bidding process as noted in paragraph 2 above, and subject to the common
law relating to "piercing the corporate veil", which in essence means that
the limited liability protection of a shareholder through a corporate entity
can be looked through if the courts determine that the corporate entity was
established merely for the purposes of avoiding liabilities properly
attributable to the shareholder.  Although this is a difficult test to prove
given the intended purposes of corporate and other limited liability
entities, it is best to establish the limited liability entity in such a way
that it has the greatest appearance of an operating company (for example, a
separate board of directors, separate management, separate employees,
separate operating agreements and leases, etc.).  As mentioned, however, it
is all a matter of degree and generally speaking it is difficult to establish
a case where the courts will allow the "corporate veil" protecting
shareholders to be "pierced".

4. With respect to capturing tax losses incurred in the limited liability
entity, if Enron Canada is the sole shareholder so that there is no change of
control on a winding-up into Enron Canada, Enron Canada can avail of tax
losses incurred in the Enron Canada entity through a winding-up.  Obviously,
however, this would mean that Enron Canada takes on the liabilities of the
special purpose entity as a result of the winding-up, including the
liabilities for any acquired PPA.  Otherwise, the general rule is that the
tax losses, if any, would be captured inside in the Enron Canada entity and
would not be available to be used against Enron Canada's taxable income.

5. With respect to Project Stanley, there is really no established case
authority directly on point, but the better view is that any sanction, if and
when imposed on Enron Canada, would be imposed in a way that would prevent
Enron Canada from indirectly avoiding the application of the sanction, such
as by moving certain business operations into a special purpose entity.  In
other words, if Canada or Alberta were intent on suspending or affecting
Enron Canada's abilities to transact through the PPAs or otherwise in the
Alberta Power Pool, it is likely that the sanction would be imposed upon
Enron Canada and its affiliated entities also transacting through the Power
Pool.

Based upon the preliminary answers, please let me know if you want a more
detailed legal opinion to consider these issues further and whether Hemstock
and I should be approaching the Government to qualify a special purpose
entity.

Regards, Peter


Please reply to george.phillips@enron.com


FYI---

Here is what I show so far for April baseload/term Katy flexible purchase gas:

Oasis meter #6780:

Aquila  10.000
Duke  20.000
Richardson   1.312
Conoco 15.000

Total  46.312  Flexible

Lonestar meter #67:

Duke  47.850 (50.000 - 2.150 inflexible)
Mitchell 20.000
Crosstex  (6.200)  (Baseload sale)

Total  61.650  Flexible

Thanks,
Mark
x33396


To all:

Over the past few months, Energy Operations has formally established global
standards.   Exception reporting will officially begin for the West Desk on
Monday, November 20th.  The exception reporting around these standards will:
help us gauge our performance and highlight areas for improvement
better allocate resources to issue areas
ensure individual and global business controllers are up to date as to
arising issues

To accomplish this, numerous requirements have been established.  The
requirement that affects trading is as follows:

Transactions are recorded accurately and timely (completeness, accuracy)
Transactions are recorded with 100% accuracy and valued appropriately in an
approved risk system for the applicable product
Transactions are input into Enpower or TAGG on date of trade (prior to calc)

HOW THIS AFFECTS WEST TRADERS:

The Risk group in Portland and Confirmations group in Houston will now begin
reporting any exceptions to the above requirement on a daily basis.   Any
deals entered late, incorrectly or changed after the calc will require full
written explanation to the Global Risk Controls group (this includes trader
name).  The materiality of the deal is not relevant, you can be written up
for 1 MW deals or 200 MW deals.  The Global Risk Controls group is looking
for flaws in the process, whether it be people-related or system related.

This exception reporting begins on Monday.  Please come to the Risk group
with any questions you may have, we would like the West Desk to appear on the
exception report as infrequently as possible.  If you have any special deal
types that you believe will be in violation of the above requirement, please
notify Risk so we can communicate this to Global Risk Controls.

Thanks for your help in this matter,

West Risk


Karen,

Can you please review the market wrap?

thanks,
Monika


Jerry,
Take a look and check to see if I missed anything.    Also,  I would assume that you have some additional energy to sell for hour ending 7&8  and he 22.   Is that true?

Thanks,
JMF


I am trading power still ... but with a lot bigger "BAT" to play with I
guess!   We are doing fine ... actually we are trying to buy a house.....and
oh yeah ..... Heather is pregant!

mc


Kevin is my hero.

-----Original Message-----
From: Brady, Kevin
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 1:52 PM
To: Germany, Chris
Subject: RE: Enbridge Consumers' Gas Park & Loan

It's done, let whomever u need to know about it?..

-----Original Message-----
From: Germany, Chris
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 10:16 AM
To: Brady, Kevin
Subject: RE: Enbridge Consumers' Gas Park & Loan

do you have sabra's cell number?
-----Original Message-----
From: Brady, Kevin
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 9:58 AM
To: Germany, Chris
Subject: RE: Enbridge Consumers' Gas Park & Loan
If that is the case then converting 327,081gj's to mm's yields 310,012mm's, so you are probably correct, I can adjust it to reduce down the 12mm's.

Kevin

-----Original Message-----
From: Germany, Chris
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 9:41 AM
To: Brady, Kevin
Subject: RE: Enbridge Consumers' Gas Park & Loan

I wonder if that bigger volume is a gigajoule thing?
-----Original Message-----
From: Brady, Kevin
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 9:14 AM
To: Germany, Chris
Subject: RE: Enbridge Consumers' Gas Park & Loan
I am starting to path it up right now, I have a question regarding the volume. The way I have interpreted these e-mails, we should be withdrawing a total of 310,000 from dawn storage, right now deal1199439 is set up to deliver 327,081. I can adjust the back end days to reduce our deliveries down to 310,000, just want to be sure this is our target #.

Kevin Brady

-----Original Message-----
From: Germany, Chris
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 7:57 AM
To: Hamic, Priscilla
Cc: Brady, Kevin
Subject: RE: Enbridge Consumers' Gas Park & Loan

Let Kevin know about any suspected unpathed deals and he will get all over it.  This guy is going to be my boss someday.

-----Original Message-----
From: Hamic, Priscilla
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:34 PM
To: Germany, Chris; Greif, Donna; Dinari, Sabra L.; Polsky, Phil
Cc: Concannon, Ruth; Garza, Maria; Dhont, Margaret
Subject: RE: Enbridge Consumers' Gas Park & Loan
There is nothing in Deal Volume Tracking regarding this deal.  I checked with Rita Wynne and she says it needs to be pathed.  As soon as that is done and I am notified, we can get the invoice out to MidAmerican.
-----Original Message-----
From: Germany, Chris
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:59 PM
To: Hamic, Priscilla; Greif, Donna; Dinari, Sabra L.; Polsky, Phil
Cc: Concannon, Ruth; Garza, Maria
Subject: FW: Enbridge Consumers' Gas Park & Loan
Phil and I were just looking at some of the invoices created for March activity and I noticed the sale to MidAmerican Energy was not in his stack of invoices to review.  Would you see if we billed MidAmerican for March please?  The deal number is 1199439, the volume is 310,000 dth and the price is $2.47 per dth.  This was gas that the ENA Ontario desk had parked at Dawn.  There are more notes at the bottom of this email.

-----Original Message-----
From: McMichael Jr., Ed
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 9:56 AM
To: Germany, Chris
Subject: RE: Enbridge Consumers' Gas Park & Loan
Good Job!  Please document the sale and the other bids, timing issues, costs, and any other factors that led to or affected the sale.  If you have any questions, please ask.
Ed
-----Original Message-----
From: Germany, Chris
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 8:53 AM
To: Mann, Kay; McMichael Jr., Ed; Concannon, Ruth; Parks, Joe
Cc: Price, Wade R.; Dickson, Stacy E.; Olinger, Kimberly S.; Polsky, Phil; Boyt, Eric; Richardson, Stacey
Subject: RE: Enbridge Consumers' Gas Park & Loan
Just sold 10,000 MMBtu per day at Dawn to MidAmerican Energy Company at $2.47 for March.  My contact at MidAmerican is Dave Evans (515-281-2698).  Dave said he was using Apr Nymx + $.05 to calculate his price.
-----Original Message-----
From: Germany, Chris
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 4:30 PM
To: Mann, Kay; McMichael Jr., Ed; Concannon, Ruth; Parks, Joe
Cc: Price, Wade R.; Dickson, Stacy E.; Olinger, Kimberly S.; Polsky, Phil; Boyt, Eric
Subject: RE: Enbridge Consumers' Gas Park & Loan
Update

Robin and I are waiting to hear back from all of the following

company                                                contact
Reliant Energy Services Inc.                    Sue Cozad  989-687-9246  low probability
Enbridge Gas Services Inc.                      Dan White  403-508-3184  new counterparty - low probability
MidAmerican Energy Company                Dave Evans  515-281-2698  good prospect
CMS Marketing, Services and Trading Company    Scott Biscoe  713-230-7286  low probability

El Paso      - no interest.

Left messages with
Duke Energy Marketing Ltd.                Steve Butler  403-297-9840
TXU Energy???                                    David Jones

-----Original Message-----
From: Dickson, Stacy E.
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 3:34 PM
To: Mann, Kay; Germany, Chris
Cc: Price, Wade R.
Subject: RE: Enbridge Consumers' Gas Park & Loan
The Goods and Services Tax (GST) in Canada is levied on sales of gas at a delivery point in Canada and where the gas will not be exported from Canada. The buyer pays the seller the amount of the  GST which is a per cent of the purchase price.  The seller, in turn, remits the amount of the GST to the appropriate Canadian authority.  In structuring the deal, be sure that you make it clear that the Contract Price does not include the GST.   If the gas it to be exported the buyer needs to notify that the gas is "zero-rated"  so it is not subject to the GST.

Wade - Do you know who in settlements is handling GST payments?  I hope we still have someone who can do that.

Please let me know if you have any other questions.

Stacy
x3-5705
-----Original Message-----
From: Mann, Kay
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 7:02 PM
To: Dickson, Stacy E.
Subject: FW: Enbridge Consumers' Gas Park & Loan
Do you know the answer to the tax question, or at least who to ask?

Thanks,

Kay
-----Original Message-----
From: Germany, Chris
Sent: Tue 2/26/2002 5:46 PM
To: Germany, Chris; McMichael Jr., Ed; Concannon, Ruth; Boyt, Eric; Garza, Maria; Polsky, Phil; Dicarlo, Louis; Olinger, Kimberly S.; Parks, Joe; Mann, Kay
Cc: Fowler, Kulvinder; Schumack, Sherlyn
Subject: Enbridge Consumers' Gas Park & Loan
Opps.  Didn't mean to hit send it just yet.  Much better now.
 -----Original Message-----
From:   Germany, Chris
Sent:   Tuesday, February 26, 2002 5:39 PM
To:     McMichael Jr., Ed; Concannon, Ruth; Boyt, Eric; Garza, Maria; Polsky, Phil; Dicarlo, Louis; Olinger, Kimberly S.; Parks, Joe; Mann, Kay
Cc:     Fowler, Kulvinder; Schumack, Sherlyn
Subject:        Enbridge Consumers' Gas Park & Loan
Today we discovered that ENA has 310,000 MMBtu parked with The Consumers' Gas Company Ltd. (an affiliate of Enbridge Inc.) at Dawn that needs to be withdrawn by March 31, 2002.    Dan White (403-508-3184) at Enbridge faxed me their confirmation.  According to Dan, this gas was parked in May and June 2001.  Per Enbridge's confirmation, "Customer shall pay Enbridge a fee of $.22 US/MMBtu...prorated over 12 months".  The confirmation makes it clear that March withdrawals are interruptible.  Dan didn't know if ENA has paid the fee but he is letting ENA take this gas for March!!!  So far have not been able to find a deal ticket in Sitara or tagg that applies to this deal.
Tomorrow, I will get bids from some of the companies ENA has done business with in the past at Dawn.  Before I sell the gas, I will
        1.  verify the creditworthiness of the company we are selling to
        2.  make sure the company we are selling to agrees to pay us for the gas and doesn't net this with some other item.
Kay, the point we are selling the gas at is Dawn which is in Canada.  Are there any special tax issues to address?

Any comments or questions?

Listed below are some of the companies ENA has done business with at Dawn
AEP Energy Services, Inc.
Aquila Canada Corp.
BP Canada Energy Company
Cargill Energy Trading Canada, Inc.
CMS Marketing, Services and Trading Company
CoEnergy Trading Company
Consumers Energy Company
Consumers Gas Company Ltd., The
Coral Energy Canada Inc.
Duke Energy Marketing Limited Partnership
Duke Energy Trading and Marketing, L.L.C.
Dynegy Canada Inc.
Dynegy Canada Marketing and Trade, a division of Dynegy Canada Inc.
El Paso Merchant Energy, L.P.
Engage Energy Canada L.P.
Nexen Marketing
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
PG&E Energy Trading, Canada Corporation
PG&E Energy Trading-Gas Corporation
Phibro Inc.
Reliant Energy Services, Inc.
Sempra Energy Trading Corp.
TXU Energy Trading Canada Limited
WPS Energy Services, Inc.


do you want to handle?  Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 09/11/2000 09:02 AM -----

	Sami Arap@ENRON
	09/11/2000 07:03 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: draft ISDA

Sara;

Can you please help me on a PPA negotiation by sending me a copy of our draft
ISDA ?  I need to use ISDA language, as per RAC's request.

Thanks & Regards,

Sami


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 06/16/2000
10:21 AM ---------------------------

"Lucie Deathridge" <ldeathridge@risk.co.uk> on 06/09/2000 12:52:54 PM
Please respond to "Lucie Deathridge" <ldeathridge@risk.co.uk>
To: <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Australian Energy Risk 2000

As Australian Energy Risk 2000 is approaching. I am emailing you with
regards  to your presentation. The deadline date is Monday 12 June. If this
is going to  be a problem please let me know I will be out of the office from
Monday 12,  until Monday 19 June, on which date I will be putting the
presentation pack  together to send to the printers. If your presentation is
complete could you  please email it to ldeathridge@risk.co.uk as a
powerpoint file ASAP.

If you have any problems in doing this please do not hesitate to contact me
by email or on (020) 7484 9867. I will reply to any queries when I return.

Regards
Lucie Deathridge
Conference Co-ordinator
Risk  Publications
?
Tel: (+44) (020) 7484 9867
http://www.riskpublications.com


I read your note back to Shona, and I understand John's desire to put a
reminder in front of people, including commerical staff members, about the
need for operating standards.  If this is the best time to put that in
writing for Europe, then by all means go forward with that.  If there is an
efficient way to reference this effort as an Enron-wide initiative to define
and monitor these standards across all locations and all commodities traded,
then that would be great.  It simply helps put the London initiative in the
context of an Enron-wide effort that we all feel is important.  --Sally

Mike Jordan
09/27/2000 02:58 AM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Fernley Dyson/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: a note being sent out under John Sherriff's name - your thoughts
on the cover note ?

Comments in red

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Sally Beck                           26/09/2000 23:57

To: Mike Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Fernley Dyson/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: a note being sent out under John Sherriff's name - your thoughts
on the cover note ?

I think that it is a great idea to get some press regarding our fundamental
operating standards, but I wonder about the most appropriate timing, enough
of a global message ( it is a European note )and the means of delivery.  On
the means of delivery, I am not sure from your note whether or not I fully
understand the intent.  Is there an article to be included in an Enron
publication ( yes )and in addition a letter to be sent under John's name (if
so, to whom will the letter be sent)?  Or is the letter from John an
introduction to be included as a lead in to the article?  ( Yes - apologies
if there is confusion )

With regard to a global message , I think that one of the key points around
fundamental operating standards are that they are intended to be global in
nature, applied to every commodity and every location where we engage in
trading activities.  With these operating standards implemented worldwide, we
will know as operations professionals that risk is being mitigated and we
will be able to ensure Enron top management that there is consistency in
operating standards worldwide.  These global standards also should enable
Enron to expand its business reach more quickly, with well defined
requirements with regard to trading operations.  I am not sure from the
article as written that the global nature of this effort comes across.
Agreed - but the note was targeted at Europe - would welcome the opportunity
to work on this with you and Shona )

Finally, a question regarding timing.  The last I knew after you and Brent
drafted this starting point for fundamental operating standards was that this
was being circulated (Shona took this to do after Brent's return to Houston)
for comments to all business controllers.  I don't believe that we are quite
at the point that we can say that all business controllers worldwide have
reviewed, understand and have implemented these standards.  And not to
belittle the process of creating the standards, the tough part (and the real
meat behind this) will be an effective exception report on a global basis
against these standards.  My commitment to Rick Causey is that I will have
that global report in production by the end of the year.  There is much work
to do in defining the content and regularity of the report and even more work
to do to identify reliable sources of data for compiling the report.  Shona
has commissioned Mike Moscoso to work on this, and I believe that Mike has
already been working with James New.  So I question whether or not you want
to publish info about fundamental standards that we can not yet report
against.  Would a more appropriate time be after the Global Operations
Controller meeting in October when we should have worldwide buy-in and
commitment to these standards and (hopefully) our first draft of a meaningful
exception report?  Can we discuss this - please see separate note from me to
Shona

Sorry that this response looks so long.  I have been interrupted 20 times
while responding, so I hope that it makes sense.  Thanks for sharing this
with me.  Since you asked for input, I hope that you don't mind that I gave
you some.  --Sally  - Certainly not  - and thanks

Mike Jordan
09/26/2000 08:14 AM
To: Fernley Dyson/LON/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: a note being sent out under John Sherriff's name - your thoughts on
the cover note ?

Fernley  / Sally

Off and on ( with Jackie Gentle's help ) I have pulled together a one page
communication note on our fundamental operating standards ( itself a one page
summary ).

We are in the final stages of this process  - where we draft a cover letter
for John which will introduce this for inclusion within Globalflash ( the
Enron Europe newsletter )

Have you any thoughts on draft or cover note ?

Mike


Debra -

Please prepare a new Master Firm Purchase/Sale per the attached.  Please email draft to:

Mr. Tom Goudie
President
Houston Energy Services Co., LLC
10497 Town & Country Way, Suite 150
Houston, TX 77024
EMAIL:  tgoudie@hesco.org

Thanks,

Jay


The Gas and Power Trading organizations have had a tremendous year.
Sometimes we as traders forget some of the crucial parts of the organization
that significantly contributed to that success.  I believe the Weather Group
comprised of Mike Robert's, Jose Marquez, Stephen Bennett and Dave Ryan from
Power are one of those groups.  These individuals have done a tremendous job
of predicting summer weather along with the route hurricanes would take.  The
greatest achievement has been the November and December winter forecast.
They held fast to their cold forecast even when outside services were
moderating.  On a score card with all other services they definitely deserve
an "A+".  When you are down on the 32nd floor it would be nice if you would
stop and congratulate them on a tremendous job and their contribution to our
success.

 Thanks,  Jim Schwieger


Attached are the revised drafts of the weather GTC's.


Attached are the 2000 Weekly cost reports.  If you have any questions, please
give me a call.  Thanks Amy 3-7805


Attached is the letter to John Sickman at Duke Energy.


Attached is the list of PRC meetings that will cover operations for ENA, EIM
and EGM.  Location, times and attendees are listed for each meeting.  There
are five pre-review meetings that will take place starting today through
December 5 in preparation for the Energy Operations PRC meeting that will be
held on Friday, December 8.  I invite you to sit in on any or all of these
meetings if you would like to do so.

The most meaningful meeting will be on  December 8th.  In that meeting, we
will review the results from the pre-review meetings for Senior Specialists
and below.  I would anticipate that if at each pre-review meeting the
preferred distribution is met as instructed, then this portion of the meeting
will not take too long.  We will then review in more detail the managers, who
will have been pre-ranked in the pre-review meetings.  We will also review
and rank the directors and senior directors.  I can also be prepared to
review my suggested rankings for the three VP's who report to me, with you,
Wes Colwell and David Oxley in attendance.

Call me if you have any questions.  --Sally


Gentlemen,

Could we schedule some time for a conference call next week?  I would
appreciate the opportunity to work through some of the legal issues.  I have
the lofty goal of not working Memorial Day weekend this year, so I'm trying
to get as much done on this deal as soon as possible.

Thanks,

Kay

PS.  I'm open Tues am and most of Wednesday.  I can probably work my schedule
so that I'm available quite a bit of next week.


***  W E E K L Y   P R O D U C T   S P E C I A L  ***
INO.com - Trusted by Traders the World Over
http://www.ino.com/

_____________________________________________________________________

Triple Your Money With Amazing
Real-Money-Proven System!

http://store.ino.com/sale/1A433/TWMM-Marksman

Marksman
_____________________________________________________________________

Dear Andrew:

I've seen his actual in-the-market results. Lee made a
$7,675 profit after commissions.  The day before was a cool
$17,302 profit, again, after commissions.  This is one of
the easiest and most reliable systems to implement I've
every encountered.

$24,977 IN 48 HOURS!

This is typical of Lee's enormous trading results.  He often
makes more each week than most people make in a year!

YOU CAN DO IT!

>>> Automatic, fully-defined technique can be used by anyone.

>>> Lee successfully taught over 100 traders and made them winners.

>>> One Texan has seen $6,500 grow to over 1/3 of a million dollars.

>>> An Australian lays claims to 110 winning trades in a row.

>>> A St. Louis trader had his first six-figure trading year ever.

>>> Another new trader turned $7,800 into over $29,000.

More Information and Special Guarantee Offer at:
http://store.ino.com/sale/1A433/TWMM-Marksman

Click here for Marksman!

Good trading,

J. Adam Hewison
President
INO.com

P.S.  Order now and receive a special FREE BONUS audio!
APPLYING TECHNICAL METHODS TO TODAY'S TRADING - John Murphy

Click here for Marksman!

_____________________________________________________________________

All claims on third-party products are made by the
publisher and not by INO.com. All Products Guaranteed.

VIEW DISCLAIMER AND CFTC RULE 4.41 AT BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE -
http://store.ino.com/sale/1A433/TWMM-Marksman

_____________________________________________________________________

Thank you for subscribing to the Weekly Specials email
from INO.com. If you want to subscribe to our other email
services, or would like to modify your profile please visit:
http://www.ino.com/email/

To unsubscribe, visit:
http://www.ino.com/email/remove/?email=alewis@enron.com&list=special

-----Copyright 2002 INO.com. All Rights Reserved------


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

November 10, 2000 5:00pm through November 13, 2000 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI SERVER:
Impact:  EDI
Time:  Sat 11/11/2000 at  11:00:00 PM CT thru Sun 11/12/2000 at  1:00:00 AM CT
 Sat 11/11/2000 at    9:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 11/11/2000 at 11:00:00 PM PT
 Sun 11/12/2000 at   5:00:00AM London thru Sun 11/12/2000 at 7:00:00 AM London
Outage:  EDI HUB DISK VOLUME INCREASE
Environments Impacted:  Corporate
Purpose: Continued EDI volume increases require the addition of more disk
space for EDI operations.
Backout: Utilize current configuration w/o new HACMP configuration
Contact(s):  Jack Metkus
  Jim Nelson  3-7799  713-327-2007
  Karen O'Grady  5-7149  713-327-4805
  Jack Metkus  3-0362  713-288-0743
EI:
Impact:  EI
Time:  Sat 11/11/2000 at  8:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 11/11/2000 at  10:00:00 PM CT
 Sat 11/11/2000 at  6:00:00 PM PT  thru Sat 11/11/2000 at   8:00:00 PM PT
 Sun 11/12/2000 at  2:00:00 AM London thru Sun 11/12/2000 at  4:00:00 AM
London
Outage:  EI Load Balancing
Environments Impacted:  El
Purpose: to stabilize the EI environment
Backout: back to 5000's
Contact(s):  Steve Hardy  713-853-9294  713-415-0672

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:  No Scheduled Outages.

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET:
Impact:  ENE Internet
Time:  Sat 11/11/2000 at  11:00:00 PM CT thru Sun 11/12/2000 at  12:00:00 AM
CT
 Sat 11/11/2000 at    9:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 11/11/2000 at  10:00:00 PM PT
 Sun 11/12/2000 at   5:00:00 AM London thru Sun 11/12/2000 at   6:00:00 AM
London
Outage:  reboot ene net devices
Environments Impacted:  Internet
Purpose: regular reboot to prevent such problems as memory corruption
Backout:
Contact(s):  Bryan Aubuchon 713-345-8446

LOTUS NOTES: No Scheduled Outages.

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS:
Impact:  CSC
Time:  Fri 11/10/2000 at  5:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 11/10/2000 at  6:00:00 PM CT
 Fri 11/10/2000 at  3:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 11/10/2000 at  4:00:00 PM PT
 Fri 11/10/2000 at  11:00:00 PM London thru Sat 11/11/2000 at  12:00:00 AM
London
Outage:  Initial "hardening" of cscfw1
Environments Impacted:  CSC
Purpose: To maintain a secure and efficient configuration
Backout: Apply old configuration
Contact(s):  Jon Werner  713-853-6742

Impact:  TDS
Time:  Sat 11/11/2000 at  12:30:00 PM CT thru Sat 11/11/2000 at  5:30:00 PM CT
 Sat 11/11/2000 at  10:30:00 AM PT thru Sat 11/11/2000 at  3:30:00 PM PT
 Sat 11/11/2000 at    6:30:00 PM London thru Sat 11/11/2000 at  11:30:00 PM
London
Outage:  TDSPROD Upgrade from 7.3.4 to 8i
Environments Impacted:  OASIS, Cooper, PDS
Purpose: In order to utilize new features available in Oracle 8i.
Backout: If the upgrade fails, then a full databse refresh from the most
recent backup will be performed.
Contact(s):  Neil Leininger  713-345-3518

SITARA:  No Scheduled Outages.

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY:
Impact:  EIS
Time:  Fri 11/10/2000 at  11:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 11/11/2000 at  1:00:00 AM CT
 Fri 11/10/2000 at    9:00:00 PM PT thru  Fri 11/11/2000 at  11:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 11/11/2000 at  5:00:00 AM London thru Sat 11/11/2000 at  7:00 AM London
Outage:  Scheduled CMS & Conversant Attended Backup and Intuity Audix reboot.
Environments Impacted:
Purpose: Monthly maintenance
Backout: rebooting system only, no back out  plan.
Contact(s):  Epimenio Rojas  713-345-8372

Impact:  EIS
Time:  Fri 11/10/2000 at  11:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 11/11/2000 at  1:30:00 AM CT
 Fri 11/10/2000 at    9:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 11/10/2000 at  11:30:00 PM PT
 Sat 11/11/2000 at    5:00:00 AM London thru Sat 11/11/2000 at  7:30:00 AM
London
Outage:  Quarterly Maintenance - Telephone Ancillary Equipment
Environments Impacted:  All
Purpose: Quarterly Maintenance
Backout: none
Contact(s):  Cynthia Siniard  713-853-0558

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:  No Scheduled Outages.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center
(713) 853-5536   Information Risk Management

Specific Applications Help:
Unify On-Call      (713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call     (713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS   (713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP    (713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR      (713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support      (713) 327-3893  [Pager]
All Other Systems    (713) 563-5797  [Pager]
      or (713) 563-5987  [Pager]


Good morning.  Do you guys have access to these ECTRIC ISDAs below?

Thanks,
Diane

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Latham, Jenny
Sent:	Thursday, December 13, 2001 9:28 AM
To:	Hunter, Larry Joe; Anderson, Diane
Cc:	Shivers, Lynn
Subject:	ISDA'S for London
Importance:	High

Joe/Diane,

We urgently need to receive copies of the ISDA's for the following counterparties (with ECTRIC):

Paul Hartmann AG
Sodra Skogsagama Ek

Please let me know when you will be able to send these to me.  We are very minimally staffed over here (as I'm sure you are as well) and really need your assistance.  Thanks.  Jenny.


David-

Is the meeting on for April 2?

Susan

David Moss <CityMgr@southside-place.org> on 03/21/2001 12:03:22 PM
To: "'susan.w.pereira@enron.com'" <susan.w.pereira@enron.com>,
"'lucy1@ev1.net'" <lucy1@ev1.net>
cc:
Subject: FW: Council - P/Z Workshop on Monday Night April 2

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:  David Moss
> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 13:27
> To: 'susan.w.pereira@enron.com'; 'lucy1@ev1.net'
> Subject: Council - P/Z Workshop on Monday Night April 2
>
>
> Susan and Dora:
>
> Would you be able to meet with councilmembers on Monday, April 2 to
> discuss the comprehensive plan and various planning issues?
>
> The backup date would be March 29th.
>
> Maurice and John are available on April 2.
>
> Staff will call Brad Smolen and Doug Bland, new member, about this date
> also.
>
> dnm


As discussed

Paul


Executive Committee Weekly Meeting
Date:  Monday, November 13
Time:  11:00 a.m. (CDT)
Location: 50th Floor Boardroom
Video:  Connections will be established with remote locations upon request.
Conf call: AT&T lines have been reserved.  Please contact Sherri Sera
(713/853-5984)
  or Katherine Brown (713/345-7774) for the weekly dial-in number and
passcode.

Please indicate below whether or not you plan to attend this meeting and
through what medium.

 Yes, I will attend in person _______

 By video conference from _______

 By conference call  _______

 No, I will not attend  _______

*  *  *

Please return this e-mail to me with your response by 12:00 p.m., Friday,
November 10.

Thank you,
Katherine


yeah.  i definately want to play.  if we get out there by 4 we can get nine
in for sure.


Let me cogitate on this.  The local counsel we use on electric matters is more of a gas attorney than an electric one, and the counsel we use for the SW Gas matters is also APS's counsel so he can't help us on these matters.  The customers are no allies, since they are happy with their deal, and the only other marketer who was active in the settlement is gone now (the internet marketer from California).  Perhaps we could talk to APS to see what they are thinking.  That might be more enlightening than anything else.  Just a thought.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 6:40 AM
To:	Lawner, Leslie; Nord, Sue
Cc:	Porter, David V.; Keene, Patrick; Kaufman, Paul; Hinrichs, Lance; Kingerski, Harry; Frank, Robert
Subject:	RE: APS Filing

I would think that we should take the time to talk with local counsel or other "allies" to get a feel for the chances in AZ.  I also think that the difficulty in AZ will be a physical problem with getting transmission service - no RTO.

It would be great to have a thorough analysis of problems in every open market just to know what the issues are.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lawner, Leslie
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 5:20 PM
To:	Nord, Sue
Cc:	Porter, David V.; Keene, Patrick; Steffes, James D.; Kaufman, Paul; Hinrichs, Lance; Kingerski, Harry; Frank, Robert
Subject:	RE: APS Filing

I have received 2 calls in the last two days from EES and ENA (Lance Hinricks and David Porter) wanting to know the details of AZ electric marketing.  They are apparently revisiting things there.  So here is my reaction to the APS filing, which I had not heard about.

It is my recollection that the spin off is part of the entire-ball-of-wax settlement approved by the ACC for the APS restructuring in 10/99.  Therefore they must have filed to reopen this settlement (which was not to be allowed, of course).  The settlement, while "opening" markets, effectively keeps them closed for lack of headroom until 7/04 at the earliest.  So, if there is a commercial interest in AZ, then this filing could give us a chance to jump back in and make the arguments we made back in 99 that the settlement would not result in competition (and it didn't - time has proved us 100% correct on that) and if APS wants to change the settlement, then the non-competitive terms should be amended as well.

That said, we do not get a great reception in AZ, and it is hard to say we would have any great chance of success.  The large customers do not mind that there is no competition because they have been on a mandated rate reduction path and saw none of the price run-ups that Californians and other westerners saw last winter (at least not yet).  We would have no one on our side.

SO, it is an opening, but I would let the commercial folks tell us how much it is worth to them, given the less than great odds.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nord, Sue
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 3:53 PM
To:	Keene, Patrick; Lawner, Leslie
Subject:	FW: APS Filing

Is this something in which you think we should be engaged?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 4:15 PM
To:	Nord, Sue; Shapiro, Richard
Subject:	RE: APS Filing

No.  Talk with Pat Keene and/or Leslie Lawner.  We haven't done much on Arizona lately.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nord, Sue
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 5:11 PM
To:	Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.
Subject:	APS Filing

Are we (or EPSA) taking an active role in the filing APS made with the Arizona Commission to use the unregulated affiliate of its parent as the wholesale provider of last resort?  (There's an article on the filing in today's Electric Power Daily that says they've filed to push back the requirement that they purchase 100% of their power from the competitive market by 2004 to a requirement that they purchase 25% of their power competitively by 2008).

Sue Nord
Senior Director
Government Affairs
713-345-4196


Dear Colleagues,

We know you have many questions about your new benefits plan, payroll issues and other changes that will occur over the next few weeks. Human Resources and Communications are preparing a thorough Q&A, which we will send to you tomorrow and will regularly update as more information is available.

Meanwhile, please read the announcement below from Security about how you can obtain a new UBS Warburg access card that will allow you to enter our new office space after Friday.

I am confident that you share my enthusiasm about our new opportunity.  We look forward to working along side each of you in the coming days.

David Oxley
Head, Human Resources
____________________________________________________________________

Access Cards

There will be a two-day transition for the new UBS Warburg access cards. Beginning Monday, February 11, access to the 5th and 6th floors of Enron Center South will require these new cards. UBS Warburg access cards can be picked up from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. at the reception area on the 5th floor of Enron Center South on Thursday, February 7th ; Friday, February 8th ; and Monday, February 11. Enron Security will produce new access cards with existing photographs, then simultaneously issue the new and collect the old cards. Employees without UBS Warburg cards will be allowed into the Enron Center South building on Monday but will have to collect their new cards as soon as possible to gain access to the 5th and 6th floors.

Employees who fail to collect their new cards by 7 p.m. Monday will be required to contact Enron Security's general information number at 713-853-5360 to arrange to pick them up.

There will be security staff available at the pick up point on ECS 5 to help with any problems you might have.

It is suggested employees wear their access cards at all times while on the premise.

Accessible Areas - The new cards will allow UBS-W employees to enter:
5th & 6th floors and Plaza area of Enron Center South ,
The Sky Ring
Body Shop, Enron Center North Plaza and therefore access the Credit Union and Cafeteria from either building.

Restricted Areas - Employees must submit to Enron Security a Restricted Access Request form (available by calling 713 8535360 ) and signed by Bob McAuliffe (713-853-7468) to enter:
Enron Center South, 8th and 9th floors
Enron Center North, 22nd and 34th floor
Ardmore Data Center.

Employees staying with the Enron estate while visa and other issues are completed - Employees in this group who are on assignment arrangements to UBS-W will be issued a regular access card - available in the same way as other new UBS-W employees.

Estate employees who are working with UBS-W on transition issues  - If they will be based in UBS-W office space they should talk to their UBS-W counterpart for approval and then UBSW HR for the issue of a UBS-W contractor card (in addition to their regular Enron badge).


continental.com Specials for KIMBERLY WARD
Wednesday, November 21, 2001
****************************************

CONTINENTAL.COM SPECIALS

Continental Airlines wishes you a safe and Happy Thanksgiving.  Due to the holiday, continental.com Specials will not be available this week.

OnePass members* can register to earn up to 20,000 OnePass miles by purchasing your eTickets on continental.com - and that's in addition to your actual flight miles. Visit:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc3?%7C%7E1.%2C%2C9th%7Em%7B_z%7Ck1zqmpq1%7Cpr9K9%2FA
for all the details and to purchase your eTickets today.

*You can enroll instantly in OnePass, our award winning frequent flyer program at:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc3?%7C%7E1.%2C%2C9th%7Em%7B_z%7Ck1zqmpq1%7Cpr9K9-A
(Note: this offer does not apply to continental.com Specials fares.)

FRIENDS & FAMILY SALE

Continental makes it easy to get together with friends & family. Whether you're planning a quick visit or a holiday reunion, continental.com saves you time and money. We're offering 10% off select sale fares in North America & Europe when you book online through December 4, 2001.

Visit:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc3?%7C%7E1.%2C%2C9th%7Em%7B_z%7Ck1zqmpq1%7Cpr9K9%2CA
to purchase your eTickets today.

Travel Updates
Be sure to check continental.com at:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc3?%7C%7E1.%2C%2C9th%7Em%7B_z%7Ck1zqmpq1%7Cpr9K9%2BA
before leaving for the airport. We're looking forward to welcoming you onboard!
---------------------------------------
This e-mail message and its contents are copyrighted and are proprietary products of Continental Airlines, Inc. Any unauthorized use, reproduction, or transfer of the message or its content, in any medium, is strictly prohibited.

****************************************
If you need assistance please visit:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc3?%7C%7E1.%2C%2C9th%7Em%7B_z%7Ck1zqmpq1%7Cpr9K9%27A
View our privacy policy at:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc3?%7C%7E1.%2C%2C9th%7Em%7B_z%7Ck1zqmpq1%7Cpr9K9*A

This e-mail was sent to: kward@ect.enron.com

TO UNSUBSCRIBE:
We hope you will find continental.com Specials a valuable source of information. However, if you prefer not to take advantage of this opportunity, please let us know by visiting the continental.com Specials page on our web site at:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc3?%7C%7E1.%2C%2C9th%7Em%7B_z%7Ck1zqmpq1%7Cpr9K9%28A

TO SUBSCRIBE:
Please visit the continental.com Specials page on our web site at:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc3?%7C%7E1.%2C%2C9th%7Em%7B_z%7Ck1zqmpq1%7Cpr9K9%29A


Re:  my voice mail concerning masters.

ckm
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/25/2001 06:20
PM ---------------------------
From: Edward Sacks/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/24/2001 03:26 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Reagan Rorschach/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:

Subject: RE: Contract comments

Forgot to make a note on the below.  I think that we need to be consistent
with terms in the EEI Master Power and Master Gas agmts.  I'm not sure if we
have sent drafts (without credit terms) of these documents, but think that we
should probably include Schedule M to the EEI since we are dealing with
government entities.  I will be out of the office tomorrow, but can be
reached by cell (713) 446-8711.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Sacks, Edward
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 12:23 PM
To: Mann, Kay; Rorschach, Reagan
Subject: FW: Contract comments

Definition of Event of Default - References Section 17.  I believe this
should be Section 14.  This same reference to 17 is also made in other areas
of the contract, such as in Section 15 "Termination".  Also, please note that
under Section 15, some of the Event of Default Sections numbers do not exist
(ie. 11 and 12).  Please look into these sections in their entirety.  With
respect to this section, I would like to change the cure period from 30 days
to 3 days and of course in instances of bankruptcy, misrepresenation in the
Reps & Warr, etc., there should not a cure period.

With respect to credit.  In reading the contract it seems that the
counterparty is going to be a consortium of entities (MDEA, Yazoo &
Clarksdale).  Are each of the counterparties jointly and severally liable?
Answers to the this relationship structure will be necessary prior to
proposing credit terms for both the Master Gas and Master Power agmts.  If
this is the structure, we should probably look into getting legal opinions
regarding the cities' authority to enter into such obligations.  In addition,
do the city's have authority to enter into agreements for greater than 1 yr.
In my experience with other munis, they generally are, but only at the
Enterprise Fund level (Public Utility).  Perhaps we should confirm this.  To
the extent that MDEA (stand alone) is not 100% supported by the cities, we
will need financial statements on MDEA.

Reagan - Please forward projected load schedule when completed.

Ed Sacks
x5-7712

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Rorschach, Reagan
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 8:31 AM
To: McNamara, Ron; Roan, Michael; Bentley, Corry; Comeaux, Keith; Coulter,
Kayne; Cross, Edith; Fairley, David; Herndon, Rogers; Homco, Jim; Kumar,
Madhup; Mann, Kay; May, Tom; Miller, Jeffrey; Morse, Brad; Nicolay, Christi;
Pagan, Ozzie; Podurgiel, Laura; Reeves, Leslie; Sacks, Edward; Serio, Erik;
White, Stacey; Will, Lloyd
Subject: Contract comments

Contract comments are due to Kay Mann.  If you have not sent them to her,
please do so ASAP.  She is working to incorporate all comments this morning.
MDEA will be in town tommorrow and Thursday to discuss.

Thanks,

Reagan
5.3363


Okay thanks, see you at 3pm!

Thanks,
Monica

            Dutch.Quigley@enron.c
            om                           To:     Monica L. Brown/Internal/Accenture@Accenture
                                         cc:
            11/27/2001 10:44 AM          Subject:     RE: Meeting

lets start at 3pm today, I need to get a few things done first with the
exchange first
I changed the meeting with Laura so that we can work as long as we need to

dq

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   monica.l.brown@accenture.com@ENRON
   Sent:   Tuesday, November 27, 2001 8:48 AM
   To:     Quigley, Dutch
   Subject:  Re: Meeting

   That will be fine!  See you at 2:30pm!

   Thanks!
   Monica L. Brown
   Accenture
   Houston - 2929 Allen Parkway
   Direct Dial: +1 713 837 1749
   VPN & Octel: 83 / 71749
   Fax: +1 713 257 7211
   email: monica.l.brown@accenture.com

               Dutch.Quigley@enron.c
               om                           To:     Monica L.
   Brown/Internal/Accenture@Accenture
                                            cc:
               11/26/2001 04:34 PM          Subject:     Meeting

   Monica,

   Can we meet for more than 1 hour tomorrow ?
   I sent an email to Laura to change meeting with her until Wednesday.

   Dutch

   **********************************************************************
   This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
   and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
   the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
   by
   others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
   authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
   reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
   delete
   all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are
   not
   intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence
   a
   binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
   affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
   be
   relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
   Thank you.
   **********************************************************************

   This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
   privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.  If you have
   received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete
   the
   original.  Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.

This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.  If you have
received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the
original.  Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.


please print all attachments (2 emails)
---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 01/17/2000
09:17 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Christi L Nicolay                           01/14/2000 04:38 PM

To: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: MIC Additional Item - Treatment of Scheduling Deadlines (Request
from SC)

FYI.  We are fighting this.
---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 01/14/2000
04:37 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Christi L Nicolay                           01/14/2000 10:01 AM

To: John Zurita/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: MIC Additional Item - Treatment of Scheduling Deadlines (Request
from SC)

---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 01/14/2000
10:01 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Charles Yeung                           01/14/2000 09:55 AM

To: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jason K Haile/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Dana
Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: ringers@ect.enron.com
Subject: MIC Additional Item - Treatment of Scheduling Deadlines (Request
from SC)

Please look at this proposal.

If adopted, it will likely shut down trading at hubs and the hourly market
this summer!

---------------------- Forwarded by Charles Yeung/HOU/ECT on 01/14/2000 10:43
AM ---------------------------

Heather Gibbs <heather@nerc.com> on 01/13/2000 08:49:49 AM
To: heather@nerc.com
cc:  (bcc: Charles Yeung/HOU/ECT)
Subject: MIC Additional Item - Treatment of Scheduling Deadlines  (Request
from SC)

TO:  MARKET INTERFACE COMMITTEE:

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Attached in Acrobat 4.0 is an additional agenda item attachment (Attachment
6j) for the January 20-21, 2000 MIC meeting.  This attachment is supporting
material for Resolution 3 under Agenda Item 6.

Bill Phillips, representing the Security Committee, will be requesting the
MIC to provide guidance on the treatment of scheduling deadlines within the
NERC TLR procedure. This will be an action item requested of the MIC.

The agenda has also been updated on the web
site:  http://www.nerc.com/~filez/micmin.html

(mic0001a.pdf)

If you have any questions, let me know.

Sincerely,

Heather Gibbs

cc: Regional Managers
 Adequacy Committee
 Security Committee

 - Attachment 6j.PDF

---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 01/17/2000
09:17 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  David Portz                           01/14/2000 06:13 PM

To: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Into product redraft

Attached is a revision of the Into product definition and  a blackline
showing changes from the January 10 draft circulated to the working group.  I
now tend to regard the last sentence of each of  3C, 3D, 4A as overkill, or
capable of being shortened, so I will look at this with fresh eyes as time
permits on Monday Jan.17th.  Let me know any thoughts you have.  Before
sending this redraft to the working group we will want to show it to Dana.


-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Bailey [mailto:sbailey@crusescott.com]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:39 AM
To: Bailey, Susan
Subject: FW: 22 things all dogs need to know

-----Original Message-----
From:	Judy Leslie
Sent:	Thursday, January 10, 2002 2:26 PM
To:	Steve Bailey; JDV
Subject:	FW: 22 things all dogs need to know

22 things all dogs need to know
>
>
> 1. The garbage collector is not stealing my stuff.
>
> 2. I do not need to suddenly stand straight up when I'm lying under
> the coffee table.
>
> 3. If I roll my toys behind the fridge or behind the sofa, they're
> gone.
>
> 4. I can shake the rainwater out of my fur BEFORE I enter the house.
>
> 5. I should not eat the cat's food, either before they eat it or after
> they throw it up.
>
> 6. It is not necessary to find the few remaining pieces of clean
> carpet in the house when I am about to get sick.
>
> 7. The bathroom wastebasket is not a cookie jar.
>
> 8. I should not chew my human's toothbrush and not tell them.
>
> 9. If I chew crayons or pens, especially the red ones, my people will
> think I'm hemorrhaging.
>
> 10. When in the car, I should not insist on having the window rolled
> down when it's raining outside.
>
> 11. Since we do not have a doorbell, I don't have to bark each time I
> hear one on TV.
>
> 12. I should not steal my Mom's underwear and dance all over the
> backyard with it.
>
> 13. The sofa is not a face towel.
>
> 14. My head does not belong in the refrigerator.
>
> 15. I should not bite the officer's hand when he reaches in for Mom's
> driver's license and car registration.
>
> 16. I should not play tug-of-war with dad's underwear when he's on the
> toilet.
>
> 17. If I eat mint-flavored dental floss out of the bathroom garbage,
> my people will think I have worms when they see a string hanging out
> of my butt.
> 18. I am not obligated to roll around in the dirt immediately after a
> bath.
>
> 19. The toilet bowl is not a never-ending water supply.
>
> 20. Sticking my nose into someone's crotch is not an acceptable way of
> saying hello.
>
> 21. The cat is not a squeaky toy, so when I play with him and he makes
> that noise, it's probably not a good thing.
>
> 22. Cat turds are not dog candy.
>


Vince,
I was brought to my attention that an interesting Real Option conference
is taking place in March 27-28. I would like to attend this conference
if possible.

Thanks.
Alex


Ron,
 Here are the final versions.

 <<Enronrsp4.24.doc>>  <<FERC_Table_Def.csv>>  <<FERC_File.csv>>

Thanks
Gary

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com

 - Enronrsp4.24.doc
 - FERC_Table_Def.csv
 - FERC_File.csv


Clem called wanting to speak to someone about the guaranty issue.  Who should
I direct him to?
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 09/18/2000 09:08 AM -----

	Peter Keohane
	Sent by: Sharon Crawford
	09/15/2000 05:39 PM

		 To: Soma Ghosh/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clement
Abrams/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Derek Davies/CAL/ECT@ECT, Andre
Templeman/CAL/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: dpef@blakes.com
		 Subject: Alberta PPA Financing

I thought I might try to sum up.  It seems to me that we both need to
finalize the structure as well as co-ordinate across various groups such that
we all know what each is doing with the view to funding on time by the end of
next week.

1. As soon as possible next week (i.e. Monday) we need to finalize the swap
structure including the credit and covenant package.

2. If there is not already a Term Sheet in place, it may be useful to have
one prepared.  Frankly, it seems from my various discussions with Global
Finance, Credit, Origination, Enron Corp., Royal Bank of Canada and its
external counsel and our external counsel, that there are certain agreements,
documents, deliverables and covenants that are being expected by, or
exchanged between, the parties, but which are not being communicated among
each other and we are therefore working at cross purposes.  Frankly, unless
and until we know what the structure is to look like, what the credit and
financial covenants are to look like, and what the documentation expectations
are, it is difficult if not  impossible to prepare documentation.  For
example:

 (a) I had a confusing conversation with the Bank as to the form of Guarantee
they were expecting from Enron Corp.  I was trying to require the Bank to
accept an Enron Corp. standard form Guarantee, whereas the Bank was looking
for a long form Guarantee that includes the covenants, representations and
warranties of Enron Corp. in its revolving credit facilities.  Based upon
this disagreement, I left a message for Clement to the effect that we may
have a problem to resolve.  However, Clement was kind enough to advise me by
voice mail that in fact Enron Corp. does not have a problem with giving a
long form Guarantee of this nature and that the form of Guarantee had in fact
been provided (by whom I'm not sure) to the Bank.

 (b) The Bank was enquiring as to what would be the governing law of the
Enron Corp. Guarantee, to which I advised it would be Texas law.  However, I
now understand there may be some agreement (by whom I'm not sure) to have the
Enron Corp. Guarantee governed by New York law.

 (c) In any event, I understand that the Bank will be looking for a form of
enforceability opinion from Enron Corp.'s outside legal counsel with respect
to the authorization, execution, delivery and enforceability of the Enron
Corp. Guarantee, as well as certain conflicts of laws opinions with respect
to the governing law of the Guarantee (Texas/New York) being enforceable.

 (d) In my discussions with the Bank this afternoon, it also became aware to
me that the Bank is expecting external counsel legal opinions with respect to
Enron Canada.  Blake, Cassels & Graydon is prepared to provide those legal
opinions.

 (e) As noted above, I have discussed with the Bank that the governing law of
the underlying swap documents would be Alberta, to which they seemed fine.  I
suggested that Ontario law would also be acceptable.

 (f) I assume that Enron Canada ought to obtain legal opinions from the
Bank's external counsel with respect to the documents and obligations of
Swapco (and perhaps even the Bank), but I will need to have this confirmed.

 (g) It came to my attention during my conversations with the Bank this
afternoon that Swapco (or financing SPV) is unaffiliated to the Bank.  This
presents problems as, I understand for accounting purposes, the two swaps
involving Enron Canada cannot be linked, for example by cross-defaults.  At
the same time unaffiliated exposures under de-linked transactions may not be
capable of being set-off.  We undertook to attempt to remedy this situation
through broadening the set-off concepts under the ISDA Master Agreements.

 (h) I do not think the Bank frankly (nor anyone else) has a firm grasp on
the credit/collateralization/margin requirements, which I think is dependent
upon a final understanding of the swap structure.

 (i) From my discussions with the Bank, it seemed to me that they were not
clear as to how their fees and costs would be repaid through the swap
structure.  Although it might be as simple as adding these amounts to the
principal amount of the swaps, I suggested that the Bank prepare a separate
"fee letter" to recover its fees.  More problematically, the Bank was not
clear as to how "increased costs" would be accounted for in the swap
structure.  Generally speaking, a Bank credit agreement contains provisions
that if there are increased costs of funding to the Bank as a result of a
change in Bank regulations or lending or reserve requirements, those
increased costs are flowed through.  They were not sure how this could be
accommodated in a swap structure.  I suggested that there may be some way to
fix this through a price adjustment mechanism in the fixed price or volumes
or through a separate indemnification in the "fee letter".

 (j) The Bank is anxious to see paper, and I am not sure who is preparing the
paper and consolidating it in a distribution package to the Bank.  For
example, I think a package that includes all of the swap Master Agreements
and related documentation (which I believe Mark T's group will prepare in
Houston), the Enron Corp. Guarantee (which I've indicated above seems to have
already been provided in draft to the Bank) and all other documentation needs
to be sent to the Bank as soon as possible, as well as to Blake, Cassels &
Graydon and Vinson and Elkins if they are to be giving legal opinions to the
Bank in connection with the transaction.  Of course this depends on
finalization of the structure as well as the credit and other covenants
package.  In concept, I have told the Bank, and I believe the Bank agrees,
that the form of the ISDA Master and related documentation would be the same
as the form of ISDA Master which currently exists between ENA and Royal Bank
of Canada, and the Bank asked that they at least be provided with that paper
as soon as possible.  Perhaps Tana could look after delivering that as soon
as possible, if not this afternoon, Monday morning.

Frankly, I think this project, if it is to get funded on time, needs a
measure of co-ordination and communication of internal and external
expectations.  It may be worthwhile to convene a conference call with all
relevant groups (i.e. Legal/Global Finance/Credit/Origination) on Monday
morning.

Regards,
Peter


I'd like to get about 30 minutes with Mark, just to catch up.

Mark Schroeder@ECT
07/27/2000 07:47 AM
To: Elizabeth Linnell/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Steven J
Kean/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Maureen McVicker/HOU/EES@EES, Beverley Ashcroft/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: trip to Houston

I expect to be in Houston next Monday from 1300, until Tuesday around 1500.
If any of you wish to meet, please have Maureen work with Beverley toput
something in the diary.

Elizabeth - if you do not mind, I think if we just sit down for a few hours,
this will be the best way to assure that Iget you timely and accurate budget
info, so can we book something?   thanks  mcs