-----Original Message-----
From: 	Exchange Information <Marketing@NYMEX.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, November 30, 2001 2:53 PM
To:	Exchange Information
Subject:	(01-412) TIERED MARGIN RATES FOR HENRY HUB SWAP (NN) AND NATURAL 	GAS (NG) FUTURES.

Notice No. 01-412
November 30, 2001

TO:                 ALL MEMBERS AND MEMBER FIRMS
                       ALL CLEARING FIRMS
                       ALL OPERATIONS MANAGERS
FROM:            J. Robert Collins, Jr., President
SUBJECT:       TIERED MARGIN RATES FOR HENRY HUB SWAP (NN) AND NATURAL GAS
(NG) FUTURES.
Effective Date: 	Monday,  December 3, 2001 (close of business)
Futures Contracts:    Natural Gas (NG), Henry Hub Swap (NN) Futures

Contract Months:      All Months
Rate Change:

NYMEX Division Outright Margins on Natural Gas and Henry Hub Swap Futures
Contracts
				Clearing		      Member

				Member		      Customer
Non-Member
Tier 1 (1st  Nearby Month):			$4,500
$4,950			$6,075
Tier 2 (2nd  Neaby Month):			$4,000
$4,400			$5,400
Tier 3 (3rd  - 6th  Nearby Months):		$3,000
$3,300			$4,050
Tier 4 (7th   - 12th Nearby Months): 		$2,500
$2,750			$3,375
Tier 5 (13th  and greater):			$2,000
$2,200			$2,700
Current systems calculate the margin requirement for spread positions by
first determining the "Scan Risk" and then multiplying the number of spreads
by a rate set by the Exchange.  Scan Risk is determined by netting the
outright margin required for each leg of a spread.  Spreading between
differently margined contracts results in a higher spread margin than
between equally margined contracts.  Below is provided an example where the
legs of a spread are margined differently.
Scan Risk Example at Clearing Member Rates
A spread consisting of one futures leg in Tier 1 and another in Tier 2 will
have its requirement (at the clearing member rates) calculated at $1,000
starting on Monday, December 03, 2001.

One Long Tier 1 NG or NN	(1 * $4,500)			=
$4,500
One Short Tier 2 NG or NN	(1 * $4,000)			=	-
$4,000
Net Scan Risk		($4,500-$4,000)			=		$
500
Spread Rate			(1* $500)			=	+
$   500
Total Requirement						=
$1,000
Scan Risk Example Summary
Margin on a Spread Between a Tier 1 and Tier 2 Futures Contract
Clearing Member (Maintenance Margin):
$1,000
Member Customer (Initial Margin):
$1,100
Non-Member Customer (Initial Margin):
$1,350

 Inter-Month Spread  Margins on Natural Gas and Henry Hub Swap Futures
Contracts
				Clearing			Member

				Member		      Customer
Non-Member
Tier 1 (1st  Nearby Month):			 $500			$550
$675
Tier 2 (2nd  Neaby Month):			 $250			$275
$237
Tier 3 (3rd  - 6th  Nearby Months):		 $250			$275
$237
Tier 4 (7th   - 12th Nearby Months): 		 $250			$275
$237
Tier 5 (12th  and greater):			 $100			$110
$135

The inter-commodity spread margins will be $0 between Natural Gas (NG) and
Henry Hub Swap (NN) futures contracts. Spread credits between Henry Hub Swap
futures and all other NYMEX energy products will be the same as the Natural
Gas spread credits.
Should you have any questions regarding these changes, please contact Arthur
McCoy at (212) 299-2928 or Joe Sanguedolce at (212) 299-2855.  This notice
supersedes all previous notices regarding outright and spread margins for
the NYMEX Natural Gas (NG).


---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 01/13/2000 12:00 PM
---------------------------

Robert B Cass
01/13/2000 11:59 AM
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Barclays Bank PLC

Hi Tana - Please remove my name from the distribution list below.  My role
has changed and I no longer require the notices.  Thanks!  - Rob

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Tana Jones                           01/13/2000 11:48 AM

To: Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laurel
Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea R Guillen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Willie Harrell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris
Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, David P Dupre/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pamela Sonnier/HOU/ECT@ECT,
William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nidia
Mendoza/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rod
Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tracy Ngo/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patricia
Cini/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Marie Heard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol
St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Marilyn Colbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Yolanda Cordova-Gilbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane
Ellstrom/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lynn E Shivers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect,
Robert B Cass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jason
Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Anthony Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary G
Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Connie Sutton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Barclays Bank PLC

We have received the executed Amendment executed as of 01/11/0, to the ISDA
Master Agreement between ENA and the referenced Counterparty dated as of July
13, 1994, This Amendment adds FX and Currency Option provisions.

Copies will be distributed.


Gerald/Karl,

My comments on the attachment are the ones in bold.  Please let me know if
you have any comments or questions.  Thanks

Ken
---------------------- Forwarded by Ken Choyce/DEN/ECT on 05/22/2000 10:54 AM
---------------------------

Ken Choyce
05/22/2000 11:01 AM
To: "Paul K. Ludwick" <pludwick1@compuserve.com>
cc:
Subject: Re: Extra Charges

Paul,

Ive attached your spreadsheet with my comments on where the contract between
Hanover and Enron disputes the request for changes from your people in
Gillette with the exeption of one task.  Please review your spreadsheet
against the referenced points and give me a call when you get a chance.
Thanks

Ken


Guys, the outside date on termination due to force majeure was moved to
October 31,2002.  It is our risk to construct the pipeline;however, it is a
breach of contract if Petrobras does not have gas at the site by April 30,
2002.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 12/19/2000
01:52 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Chip Schneider @ ENRON                           12/19/2000 12:34 PM

To: Larry L Izzo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Gorte/HOU/ECT@ECT, David W
Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brett R Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES,
Terri Denning/Corp/Enron@Enron, Andre
Cangucu/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Elektrobolt DASH - EE&CC Questions/Comments

Larry:

Rick Buy has asked that I respond to you directly on your concerns outlined
in your memo this morning:

1.  With respect to EPC price, the range in the DASH text indicates EPC Price
range reported to us by the deal team without the contingency.   Dan Leff has
changed the DASH to reflect a range with the $10 million contingency.  For
modelling purposes, we have used the following aggregated values in our
probabilistic evaluation to account for the EPC Contract Price and a $10
million hard cost contingency:

   ($000s)
P5   $194.25
P50 (expected)  $210.00
P95   $225.75

2.  With regard to schedule, I am told that EE&CC has a copy of the
Consortium Agreement where this information is contained.  I retrieved this
information from that document.  I have attached a copy of the Consortium
Agreement.  I hear your points and understand the risk.  The schedule will be
driven by receipt of the necessary permits.  If the permitting process does
not proceed as expected, I recommend that EWS/Americas Management reconsider
the incremental investment in the project.  On-going dialogue between
EWS/Americas and EE&CC will be essential in determining the continued
viability of the schedule.  Enron owns 25% of CEG and does not have
control--I would recommend that we consult with Enron legal on this question.

3.  It is prudent to restrict expenditures to $15 million until we receive
our permits given this is the maximum recoverable amount from Petrobras.
From a permitting perspective, we are unable to commence construction of the
plant beyond site clearance without the actual environmental and installation
permits anyway, so whether or not we place a $15 million constraint on
expenditure, the absence of permits will not allow for further construction.
An issue comes along with respect to long-lead items and whether these should
be ordered in advance of permit issuance.  Our understanding is that the $15
million figure was derived with the assistance of EE&CC and takes into
consideration funding required for long-lead items.

4.  The 9169 btu/kwh is assumed to be LHV in the model.

5.  The Consortium Agreement anticipates a 92% availability for maximum
payout of the capacity payment.  The capacity payment is discounted ratably
to the extent the Equivalent Availability Factor is less than 92% as per
Schedule 8.06 in the Consortium Agreement.

With regard to future co-ordination, please designate an individual to be
placed on the circulation for all DASHs in the future.  I will ensure that a
DASH is provided within a time frame appropriate for response and discussion.

Please let me know if you have any further questions or concerns.

Regards,

Chip

To: david.gorte@enron.com, Chip Schneider/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: DASH FOR RIOGEN MERCHANT (AKA "ELECTROBOLT")

fyi, please respond, tx rick
---------------------- Forwarded by Rick Buy/HOU/ECT on 12/19/2000 10:26 AM
---------------------------

Larry L Izzo@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
12/19/2000 10:04 AM
To: Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Richard Leibert/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: DASH FOR RIOGEN MERCHANT (AKA "ELECTROBOLT")

Rick, I was provided a copy of the DASH at 6:30 PM last evening and asked to
sign off soonest.  My comments follow:

Cost:  the DASH is incorrect.  EECC has provided both a cost - plus price and
a guaranteed price.
EECC has provided a NEPCO-guaranted price of $215MM.
EECC has indicated that it's estimate of actual costs is most likely $205MM.
We indicated this cost estimate was somewhat conservative.  Since last week,
the cost estimate has been further revised to $202MM.  It is unlikely that
the actual costs of the project will be significantly less than $202MM.
$202MM represents a cost estimate with the Owners maintaining the risk of
overruns and schedule.  This would require the Owner to maintain a
contingency in his proforma above the most likely expected cost of $202MM.
After providing the above information to the Developer, the Developer was
going to take a look at the carrying cost of turbines which were inside this
estimate; I have no update on whether the turbine price changed from the
numbers I saw last week.
Schedule:  Neither my team nor I had seen the provisions of termination by
Petrobras, as stated in the DASH, prior to last evening.  The ability of
Petrobras to terminate at April 30, 2002 if the project is not completed due
to circumstances within Enron's controls, is an unlikely risk, but not
totally impossible.  Further, the project is subject to a June 30, 2002,
termination by Petrobras if the project is not completed due to force
majeure.  This is considered more of an onerous risk.  It's not clear to me
whether the requirement to complete the pipeline and bring gas to the project
would be considered under Enron's control, considering that Enron is a
partial Owner in CEG, the gas distribution pipeline company.
On the other hand, we have indicated that an October 31, 2001 start-up, is
reasonable, based on a full NTP by January 1, and site access on February 1.
If the schedule is constrained by the RAC recommendation to limit expenses to
$15MM, the October 31, start-up could be at risk.
Performance:  The stated agreement with Petrobras for 365 megawatts (site
condition) and an average net degraded heat rate of 9169 btu/kWH, appears
correct, if it is LHV.
O&M Guarantee:  The DASH is not clear on what O&M availability guarantee
Enron is prepared to sign with Petrobras.  I would suggest that OEC insure it
agrees with any availability guarantees prior to Enron signing the Petrobras
agreement.

Rick, sorry for this late feedback, but our system of coordination with the
RAC needs improvement.  In the days when I worked with EI, EECC would provide
to EI a written due diligence report direct, after checking the proforma
against the PPA.  This was an Enron lesson-learned after years of
experience.  The recent reorganizations have diluted this procedure.  I
suggest I discuss with you how to improve our due diligence process.

Regards,

Larry

LI54600


Ken,

In your last email, you requested additional information.  The attached
memo provides you with my observations and suggestions concerning
Northern and Enron.

Have a GREAT DAY!

Neal Shaw

 <<2nd Response to Ken Lay.doc>>

Neal Shaw
U.S. Energy Services, Inc.
Phone:  (402) 861-9520
Cell:      (402) 578-8897
Fax:      (402) 861-0461

 - 2nd Response to Ken Lay.doc


Hi folks:
 Very glad to hear about the new developments. Just to recap what we
discussed this morning about different things you need to look into to set up
trading operations and the contacts:

1. Licence to trade: Regulatory people: I guess you know about this part
better than me.

2. Trading & Risk Mgmt: Global Risk Mgmt oversight: John Sherrif in London
has the overall responsibility outside Western Hemisphere. Research group can
help with the structuring models used for trading.

3. Risk Conrols: Before trading group is operational, it needs to get the
authorization from the Board of Directors of Enron along with total position
limits and possibly value@risk limits. These limits are typically by
commodity type and by region. Risk Assessment & Control (RAC) under Rick Buy
performs the internal control function ensuring that the businesses adhere to
these trading limits.  Ted Murphy is the VP in RAC overseeing the trading
operations. The value@risk models come from the Research group, but
day-to-day monitoring of the numbers is done by Ted's group.

4. Credit Risk: A credit reserve number is computed for each deal (again, the
models are created by Research) and is transferred to the credit group under
Bill Bradford (also in RAC). This is basically like buying insurance from the
corp. , so that if there is a couterparty default, the loss is covered by the
reserve pool of the credit dept.

5. Legal: The name I was given is Alan Aronowitz for legal help.

6. Back Office: Initially can survive with Excel spreadsheets. You should
contact the IT though when the plans finalize to talk about systems.

Australia is the most recent place where we set up the trading operations.
You can talk to Paul Quilky, the trader there to talk about these issues
(mention to him that Grant Masson in Research gave his name).

Barry Pierce in London was incharge of back office at the begin there.
 I can coordinate for talking with people next week. Give me a call Monday if
possible. I hadn't the time to search for the presentation stuff today. Will
do it next week.

Krishna.


Sam,

Here it is.

Vince

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  William Smith @ ENRON                           03/05/2001 08:23 AM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Kaminski Column

Good morning, Vince.  Did you get a chance to put a little something together
for today's newsletter?

Sam


john k, perhaps we could get together wed and go thru the package...rod will not be in.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayslett, Rod
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 7:37 AM
To:	Keiser, John; Saunders, James
Cc:	Campos, Kathy
Subject:	RE: Gruber Meeting on 2002 Plan still on

You can use my office but I may not be here.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Keiser, John
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 7:36 AM
To:	Hayslett, Rod; Saunders, James
Subject:	Gruber Meeting on 2002 Plan still on

We are still on with Greg on Thursday, Nov. 29th, 8:00-10:00 am but since Greg will now be downtown he has agreed to meet in Rod's office.

Do you guys want to meet ahead of the meeting to review or discuss the package?


Please put the 2 mw bookout in Enpower for 3/10 HE 17.  2mw @ $5
gracias


fyi.
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 04/30/2001
07:43 AM ---------------------------

Rosalee Fleming on 04/26/2001 04:00:22 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: On Market Power in California

Ken wanted you to have a copy
---------------------- Forwarded by Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron on 04/26/2001
03:51 PM ---------------------------

Willliam Hogan <William_Hogan@harvard.edu> on 04/25/2001 06:34:08 AM
To: ER:;
cc:
Subject: On Market Power in California

FYI.? The complete version of the following paper is available on my web page
at:

www.whogan.com

????????ON THE EXERCISE OF MARKET POWER THROUGH
STRATEGIC WITHHOLDING IN CALIFORNIA
Scott Harvey and William W. Hogan
April 24, 2001

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Beginning in June of 2000, the shock of unexpectedly high prices in the
California electricity market convinced everyone of the need for policies to
correct the apparent market failures.? The public debate and policy
discussions have been dominated by a focus on market power as a principal
problem amenable to regulatory solution.? However, design of effective
policies to moderate prices or mitigate their effects depends on the
diagnosis of the underlying causes.? High prices attributable largely to an
exercise of market power in electric generation would point to particular
market participants and behaviors that could be targeted for regulatory
action.? By contrast, high prices attributable to bad electricity market
design would indicate a need for changes in the design.? High prices
attributable to higher fuel prices, environmental constraints and capacity
shortages, on the other hand, would prompt actions to address the cost of
fuel and environmental limitations and indicate that retail loads should
receive the appropriate price signal for conservation.

Suppliers could affect market prices by strategically withholding some
capacity in order to profit on the capacity actually sold in the market.? But
charging high prices during periods of scarcity is not classified as
exercising market power if there is no strategic withholding of supply.?
Likewise, refusing to supply without being paid is not an exercise of market
power.? Although the potential for withholding exists for many suppliers, the
focus of attention has been on the exercise of market power by thermal
generators in California.

On its face, the experience of extremely high prices suggests that the
exercise of market power could be important.? But at the same time the data
show that there have been profound changes in the California market such that
the thermal generators have actually increased their production more than
demand has grown.? If anything, thermal generators that hit annual output
limits produced too much rather than too little in the summer of 2000.?
Furthermore, the widespread impacts of higher electricity prices throughout
the western market, both on and off peak,? indicate that if the exercise of
market power is important it is occurring to an extent and through channels
unprecedented in this or other electricity markets.? In short, this is a
complicated story, and there is ample room for further investigation of the
data and diagnosis of causes.

Examination of the major analyses of the exercise of market power reveals
that the estimated magnitude of the possible strategic withholding of
electric generation is small enough to make it important to verify the
simplifying assumptions.? If strategic withholding were large and pervasive,
then the real details of the California electricity market could be ignored.?
But it is by now apparent that the evidence is not clear, and any finding of
the presence or absence of strategic withholding of generation in the
California electricity market could turn on the simplifying assumptions used
in the analysis of the data.? For example, annual limits on production
dictate that plants should not run in many hours when prices are higher than
direct incremental costs; hence, examinations of output decisions for
individual hours or months are necessarily incomplete.? The variation in real
time conditions is large enough to produce significant reductions in output
compared to the expectations given day-ahead prices; hence, with capacity
constraints average optimal production is necessarily less than optimal
production at average prices.? Limits on the ramping rate of generation
units, start-up costs, minimum load costs and other operational
inflexibilities imply that a dispatch day is not just twenty-four separate
hours and must be analyzed chronologically, recognizing these factors.? And
so on.? Accounting for such effects can reverse the implications of the
previous evidence.? Unfortunately, the real details are neither simple nor
incidental.

It is difficult to conduct a study of market power based solely on publicly
available data.? A fuller analysis would require data available only to the
California Independent System Operator, and has not been done.? Many factors
contributed to higher electricity prices in California, and the market power
theme is only, at most, part of the story.? The import of the previous
analyses is not to prove that market power has been exercised in the
California electricity market but, rather, to suggest that it might be
important.? The import of the sensitivity analysis here is not to prove that
market power has not been exercised in the electricity market? but, rather,
to suggest that it is unlikely to be the dominant factor and may not even be
significant.? With the available data in the public domain, and the special
complications introduced by the California market design, the margin of error
in estimating the extent of the possible exercise of market power through
strategic withholding of electric generation is of the same order of
magnitude as the effect being measured.? On balance, to date the publicly
available data provides no reason for the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission to change its conclusion that there is no evidence of strategic
withholding nor any proof that no strategic withholding has occurred.

By contrast, there is general agreement that the California electricity
market design is &seriously flawed.8? Furthermore, there is evidence that the
policy responses that have been adopted in California have accelerated an
already serious market collapse.? Hence, without dismissing the possibility
of the exercise of market power, the principal policy focus should be on
fashioning workable solutions for the other more serious problems in market
design that relate to the underlying causes of the market meltdown.

Separate from market power mitigation, California should pay its bills, raise
incremental prices to retail customers, and move as quickly as possible to
operating a coordinated and efficient market with consistent pricing for all
that includes unit commitment, day-ahead scheduling, and real-time
balancing.? Although not a panacea, these steps would address immediate
problems and set the stage for longer-term initiatives to expand generation
capacity, transmission infrastructure, and the reach of an efficient market
to the western interconnected grid.

William W. Hogan
John F. Kennedy School of Government
Harvard University
79 John F. Kennedy Street
Cambridge, MA 02138
617-495-1317 (o)
617-495-1635 (f)
william_hogan@harvard.edu
web page: www.whogan.com
or
http://ksgwww.harvard.edu/people/whogan


We were thinking of having another interview session for the Trading Tract
later this month.   I've been screening outside resumes but internally we
haven't received many suggestions from each of you about other people already
at Enron.  If you think anyone could qualify send the name to Karen Buckley.
If we don't have enough candidates, we will wait until the new analysts and
associates arrive and do a session then.

Lavo


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Oscar Dalton/HOU/ECT on 03/08/2000 04:58
PM ---------------------------

Oscar Dalton
03/08/2000 12:18 PM
To: Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

here is my first cut at Rochester.  Please add the non-binding language you
want.

Remember, the RFP is only focused on the turbine.  We have previously advised
Rochester that we cannot sell a turbine without bundling with other services.


Kathryn -

Below is a revised version and clean version of the agreement.   These
incorporate the changes we just discussed.

If these changes meet with your approval, please have the agreement reviewed
by your appropriate business personnel.  If acceptable at that level, please
have two originals of the agreement signed and dated.  Once completed, a fax
of a signed document should be forwarded to my attention (at the below fax
number).  I will ensure it is countersigned by Enron and faxed back to your
attention.  The originals should be forwarded for completion by Enron and,
once completed, one fully signed original will be forwarded back to your
attention.

I appreciate your cooperation with this matter.  Please do not hesitate to
call me if you should need anything further.

Mark
Senior Counsel, ENA
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3940
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com


-----Original Message-----
From: a friend [mailto:route@monster.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 9:14 PM
To: Lokay, Michelle
Subject: interesting
Importance: High

Look what I found at jobsearch.monster.com. I thought this might help you with your job searching.

<http://jobsearch.monster.com/getjob.asp?JobID=13942393&AVSDM=2002%2D02%2D05+14%3A08%3A00%2E000&CCD=my%2Emonster%2Ecom&JSD=jobsearch%2Emonster%2Ecom&HD=company%2Emonster%2Ecom&Logo=1>

Comments:
I thought you might be interested in this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------


---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 11/13/2000
01:39 PM ---------------------------
To: Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Fwd: Election concession & retraction parody. Has good audio also.

---------------------- Forwarded by Ross Prevatt/HOU/ECT on 11/13/2000 01:08
PM ---------------------------

Charles H Otto
11/13/2000 01:03 PM
To: Ross Prevatt/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fwd: Election concession & retraction parody. Has good audio also.

---------------------- Forwarded by Charles H Otto/HOU/ECT on 11/13/2000
02:01 PM ---------------------------

Chris Gaskill@ENRON
11/13/2000 12:35 PM
To: Charles H Otto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tara Piazze/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Fwd: Election concession & retraction parody. Has good audio also.

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Gaskill/Corp/Enron on 11/13/2000
12:35 PM ---------------------------

Marc Bir <marc@delphihome.com> on 11/13/2000 12:29:45 PM
To: Chris.Gaskill@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Fwd: Election concession & retraction parody. Has good audio also.

><http://www.mediatrip.com/shows/phone_flash.html
>http://www.mediatrip.com/shows/phone_flash.html


Gentlemen,

Attached is a list of due diligence questions for the Enron generation
assets (Wheatland, Lincoln, Gleason and LV Cogen).  We would very much
appreciate your help is getting answers for by Friday, 10/20 if possible.

Unfortunately, we are still having significant difficulty in accessing
documents on DealBench.  The download time is usually several minutes to a
half hour per document and often the larger documents will not fully print
out on our systems.  Two of our consultants have experienced similar
difficulties which suggests that whatever problems we are facing are not
unique to systems at PECO.

We are concerned that the limited information will impact our ability to
bid on the assets.  Would it be possible to receive from you either a print
out of the documents or the documents on CD ROM?

Mike Cazaubon

(See attached file: Due Diligence Questions.doc)

************************************************************************
This e-mail and any of its attachments may contain PECO-Energy
proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject
to copyright belonging to the PECO-Energy family of Companies.  This
e-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed.  If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution,
copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments
to this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and
permanently delete the original and any copy of this e-mail and any
printout. Thank You.
************************************************************************

 - Due Diligence Questions.doc


Executive Summary
-CPUC rules that SoCal must pay 15% of debt to QFs (approximately $50 million)
-Ruling heightens likelihood of voluntary bankruptcy filing by SoCal
-Voluntary filing further heightened by successful ring-fencing by EIX parent
-Bankruptcy judge firm in support for QFs

Report

1. SoCal Loses CPUC Ruling, But Retains Appeal Option

As you may have seen, Bloomberg reported that the CPUC voted 5-0 to force
SoCal to make 15% of its payments owed to alternative energy producers in
California.  CPUC rules allow 30 days to appeal its rulings, leaving a window
open for SoCal to buy more time.

2. Voluntary Filing In?

With regard to a SoCal bankruptcy filing, the key now is how SoCal's board
feels about progress rather than deadlines with creditors.  In other words,
sources believe that a voluntary filing is more likely than an involuntary
filing.  A continuing lack of progress on a bailout and an increase in the
number of liens filed against SoCal is more likely to make the SoCal board
want to file for bankrutpcy voluntarily.  The recent ring-fencing by Edison
International reflects their need to pay off cross-default risk and to cut
ties
in their bank facility between the parent company and lines of credit helds
by SoCal.
 In and of outself, it does not necessarily signal an imminent filing.

3. Involuntary Out?

Sources indicate that the unsecured financial creditors are not
considering a filing against SoCal.  This is because the financial creditors
believe that they would still be worse off in bankruptcy.  Sources report
that in creditor discussions, there has not been talk of the debt holders
not being paid.  "People have talked about screwing the generators and
everyone else, but not the debt holders," a source commented.

The QFs are unlikely to file against SoCal because they have fairly good
contracts in place.  Also, they receive high capacity fees in the summer
(these fees vary seasonally and are distinct from generating fees).  These
capacity fees are calculated on a rolling, 4-year basis and will be
re-calculated next year.  The QFs want this summer included in the
recalculation, incentivizing them to keep their contracts in place.

4. Montali Supporting QFs

Judge Montali, by his recent rulings, is sending a signal that he is
concerned for the QFs and is sensitive to their hardships.  He is trying to
help them through his rulings.  For example, as long as QFs remain on line,
those who petition can receive additional payments from PG&E.  Over a
4-month period, these payments equal 20% of the QFs' pre-petition claims.
This provides the QFs incentive to remain connected to PG&E.

5. GE Looking to Restructure Generating Capacity Financing

General Electric is reportedly "deeply concerned" about the stability of
financing generating capacity in the US.  (GE has over 70% of the gas
turbine market.)  GE is reportedly trying to keep its margins down and is
not raising its prices due to concerns about instability.  Sources believe
that a very significant percentage of generating capacity financing will
have to be restrucured in five years.


Disregard the last email from me.  Attached are the prepared comments that
Steve Kean will have at the FERC meeting tomorrow.

----- Forwarded by Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron on 11/08/2000 06:37 PM -----

	"Jeffrey Watkiss" <dwatkiss@bracepatt.com>
	11/08/2000 06:36 PM

		 To: <snovose@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject:

 - 0133819.01


The PEP system is no longer available to accept feedback from reviewers.  If
necessary, you can still call the employee's reviewers who have not submitted
feedback via the PEP system.  Verbal feedback can be included as part of the
consolidated review .

The following is a list of action items for next steps for Supervisors:

ACTION ITEM	DEADLINE

Print Consolidated Feedback 	Wednesday,  Nov 22
Thanksgiving Holidays	Thursday- Friday November  23-24
Review/Approve Employees Peer Group and Supervisor  (HR will provide report
by 11/21)	Tuesday, November 28
Pre-Rank Employees based on Consolidated Feedback	Tuesday, November 28
Send Pre-Rankings to Norma via encrypted e:mail	Wednesday, November 29
Vince will review Pre-rankings	Monday, December 4, 2000
ENA Research PRC Meeting	Friday, December 8
Written/Verbal review provided to employee	December 20-January 20
Signed Review Form due to HR 	January 27, 2000

Forward to appropriate parties, with sensitivity of the confidentiality of
this information.  If you have questions regarding the PRC process please
feel free to call me.

Norma Villarreal
X31545


Keep in mind that when you do amendments to move primary points around, the rate must be changed in CBS for the corresponding new paths.  Otherwise, CBS reflects  max rates.

It would also be helpful when a new contract is executed that the rate be put in CBS; otherwise, again CBS reflects max rates.

It is important to get these rates in CBS as the forecasting model pulls all rate information from CBS.  If CBS reflects max rates the revenues will be grossly over estimated.

Thanks for your help!

Jan


Hello everyone,

Thank you everyone for your fast and prompt payment. I will ship out your
item(s) tomorrow morning (01-18-01). Please let me know when you receive my
items. I have also left positive feedback for all of you at ebay. Please do
the same for me after you receive your merchandise(s). My user id at ebay is
"sell.com".  You can view your feedback and item on eBay. Thank you very much
for your businesses. I look forward to doing  business again with all of you
in the future. Thanks again and  Take care.

Sincerely,

Roger (eBay: sell.com)
e-mail: lawyer4428@aol.com

=============================================================
check it out...
Rentmydvd.com
www.rentmydvd.com


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/27/2001 09:58 AM -----

	Jean Munoz <jmunoz@mcnallytemple.com>
	03/26/2001 10:11 AM

		 To: <smara@enron.com>, <jeff.dasovich@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Enron in Sac Bee

FYI, in case you haven't already seen this:

CalPERS has big energy tie
By John Hill
Bee Capitol Bureau
(Published March 26, 2001)

When Californians complain about energy outlaws romping through the chaotic
electricity market, carting wagonloads of money to Texas, one name often
tops the list: Enron Corp.

But at least one pretty sizeable wagon full of cash has not gone home to
energy moguls in 10-gallon hats, but rather to retired California government
workers on pensions.

For eight years, Enron has had an unusual investment partnership with the
California Public Employees' Retirement System, the fund that administers
retirement and health benefits to more than 1 million past and present
public employees.

Most recently, the two agreed in 1998 to pony up half a billion dollars each
for business ventures in energy companies, including Enron subsidiaries --
although not the one that markets electricity in California.

CalPERS and Enron have, on average, doubled their money each year. That
makes the Enron deal one of the pension fund's most lucrative.

CalPERS owns stock in thousands of companies, including high-performing
electricity generators and lagging utilities. But Enron is one of fewer than
10 companies involved in this kind of venture with the pension fund.

"Enron is one of our oldest and closest relationships here in the
alternative investment area," Barry Gonder, a CalPERS senior investment
officer, told a CalPERS committee last October. "And as you all know, it's a
highly innovative and successful company."

All true, but in California, Enron has been a major player in the
electricity market, and the company and its chairman, Kenneth Lay, a
prominent supporter of President Bush, have become lightning rods for
high-voltage rage.

"Lay pockets millions every year into his personal account and now he wants
us to pay him more," a Sacramento resident asserted in a letter to The Bee
last month. " ... The power companies are reducing power to drive up prices
and put more money in the pockets of people such as Lay."

Enron has been making scads of money -- profits were up 34 percent in the
fourth quarter of 2000. But the company won't say how much of this comes
from California, and minimizes the importance of this market.

Despite the hostility toward Enron, no one has asked CalPERS about the
arrangement, said spokeswoman Patricia Macht.

Even if it did cause an outcry, CalPERS doesn't make investment decisions
based on the popularity of the companies. Even when CalPERS divested itself
of tobacco stocks recently, it justified the decision by citing lawsuits and
regulatory actions that could sour the investments.

In fact, Macht said, CalPERS is barred by its fiduciary responsibility to
its members from applying social filters that are not in keeping with their
financial best interests.

"It's a slippery slope," she said. "If we do it for energy now, what's to
say a month later, a legislator or interest group who has a beef against a
single company" might also demand that CalPERS sell its stock.

At the October meeting, CalPERS committee sessions didn't address Enron's
role in the electricity crisis. State Controller Kathleen Connell, however,
asked Andy Fastow, Enron's chief financial officer, how power shortages
affected Enron's profits.

"How does Enron benefit from that, and what can you do to maximize this fuel
energy shortage, not only now but as we move into the future?" Connell
asked. She was unavailable for comment Thursday and Friday.

Consumer advocates said they were surprised to learn of the CalPERS
connection to Enron.

"I guess it's nice that some folks on retirement income get a soft landing
because they were thrown into cahoots with marauders," said Nettie Hoge of
the Utility Reform Network in San Francisco, an advocacy group. But she
added, "It's a short-term return for a bargain with the devil."

The CalPERS relationship with Enron goes back to 1993, before California
even embarked on its ill-starred energy deregulation experiment.

At the time, the energy sector was out of favor with investors. CalPERS
figured that the reputation masked some good opportunities, and decided to
start putting money in energy, said Gonder, the CalPERS investment officer.
CalPERS needed a partner that understood the industry. Enron was an obvious
choice.

Enron had its own reasons to hook up with CalPERS.

The company did not respond to requests for comment. But in the October
CalPERS committee meeting, Fastow said that Enron has been investing about
$7 billion a year in the energy and communications industries. "So we need a
lot of capital," he said. Cal-

PERS, with assets of $165 billion, is one of the biggest pots of money
around.

Enron could have issued stock for the investments. But as a public company,
it has to worry about showing quick returns, Fastow said. A pension fund, he
said, could provide "more patient money."

As it turns out, CalPERS patience has not been tried. In the initial 1993
deal, Enron and Cal-PERS both kicked in $250 million. By the time CalPERS
cashed out five years later, it had earned an average yearly return of 23
percent.

"We said, 'It's working for both of us, so let's continue,'" Gonder said.

In 1998, the two created a $1 billion fund to invest in oil and gas, coal
and electricity companies -- everything from oil rigs to high-tech
electricity meters.

About $38 million of CalPERS money went to Enron Energy Services, which
sells natural gas and electricity to industrial and commercial customers and
helps them figure out better ways to keep down their energy use and costs.
Three years later, CalPERS sold the investment back to Enron for about $124
million, for a profit of $86 million.

Another investment did even better. In 1999, the partnership put up $80
million to buy some New Jersey cogeneration plants, which produce both
electricity and steam. A mere four months later, a 49 percent interest in
the plants, which cost the partnership $39.2 million, was sold to another
company for $150 million.

Each partner has invested about $300 million so far, with an average yearly
rate of return of 100 percent. The remaining money in the partnership is
expected to last another seven or eight years.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Yuan, Ding
Sent:	Wednesday, August 29, 2001 9:06 AM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J; Bharati, Rakesh
Subject:	Notes On Raptors

Vince:

Based on what I learn from you, Rakesh, and Gordon, I have put together this set of quick notes for David, Cassandra and Rudi.  Please take a look at your convenience.  I know that I have not touched a lot of details.  But I am hoping to just paint a big picture on the possible impact of the Raptor structures.

Thanks,

Ding.


Please keep open the possibility of holding the luncheon on Monday, April
23, as that date was good for everyone, and the Hyatt may be able to host
us then.  Thanks.

Jeff Sokoloff
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today!  For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.


Here is the FERC order and press release.  Please call with questions

Katie Kaplan
Manager of State Policy Affairs
IEP
(916) 448-9499

 - CaliforniaOrderPressRelease11-01-00.doc
 - Order in Docket EL00-95.doc


----- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 11/02/2000 08:35 AM -----

	Continental Airlines <CO.O.L._103100@airmail.continental.com>
	10/31/2000 09:56 PM

		 To: Elizabeth.Sager@Enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: ONEPASS MEMBER CO.O.L. TRAVEL SPECIALS FOR Elizabeth Sager

CO.O.L. TRAVEL SPECIALS
Continental.com Ranked Number 1 Airline Website.
Awarded Best Website by InsideFlyer Magazine.
DOMESTIC U.S.
Wednesday, October 31, 2000
****************************************
CO.O. L. TRAVEL SPECIALS.

Our Low Florida Fares Just Got Lower

Purchase your ticket online to one of the available Florida destinations and
receive an extra $5 off our already low fares. In addition to the extra
savings, you earn 1,000 OnePass Bonus Miles for purchasing your eTicket on
continental.com. This special online only discount is available for select
markets, and flights. Visit
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eCR703p650a0EoXX
and book your ticket by November 6, 2000.

Run In The Houston Marathon!

Continental Airlines is the Official Airline of the Compaq Houston Marathon
that will be held on January 14, 2001.  As a CO.O.L. Travel Specials member
and OnePass member, you will receive a 20% discount on the Compaq Houston
Marathon entry fee.  Just log onto
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eCR703p650a0EoUU
by December 15th to register for the marathon. As an added bonus, you will be
automatically entered in the "Compaq Marathon Sweepstakes" for a chance to win
Compaq merchandise (see official rules for details).

****************************************
TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR CO.O.L. TRAVEL SPECIALS
1. CO.O.L. Travel Specials Offers
2. Featured Fares Sample Destinations
3. Alamo Rent A Car Offers
4. National Car Rental Offers
5. Hilton Hotel Offers
6. Sheraton, Westin, and Four Points Hotel Offers

****************************************
This week's specials are good for the following markets departing  Saturday,
November 4 and returning on either Monday, November 6 or Tuesday, November 7,
2000.

Please see the Rules/Terms and Conditions listed at the end of this e-mail.
****************************************
1.  CO.O.L. Travel Specials Offers

Purchase CO.O.L. Travel Specials online until 11:59pm (CST) Friday at
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eCR703p650a0E34
You can also purchase CO.O.L. Travel Specials for an additional cost of $20
per ticket through our telephone service at 1-800-642-1617.

********************************
TRAVEL MAY ORIGINATE IN EITHER CITY:
********************************
****Roundtrip BETWEEN CLEVELAND, OH and:
$129 Albany, NY
$189 Allentown, PA
$159 Fort Wayne, IN
$159 Lansing, MI
$149 Milwaukee, WI
$179 New York  (LaGuardia only)
$169 Raleigh Durham, NC

****Roundtrip BETWEEN HOUSTON, TX and:
$139 Amarillo, TX
$139 Birmingham, AL
$159 Greensboro/Piedmont Triad, NC
$149 Greenville/Spartanburg, SC
$179 Indianapolis, IN
$109 Killeen, TX
$109 Lake Charles, LA
$139 Laredo, TX
$129 Little Rock, AR
$139 Oakland, CA
$179 Pensacola, FL
$169 Washington, DC (Dulles Airport only)

****Roundtrip BETWEEN NEW YORK/NEWARK (Newark only) and:
$89  Buffalo, NY
$89  Burlington, VT
$149 Greensboro/Piedmont Triad, NC
$169 Greenville/Spartanburg, SC
$139 Norfolk, VA
$89  Rochester, NY
$189 San Jose, CA

********************************
2.  FEATURED FARES SAMPLE DESTINATION

Choose your fare, find your flight. Or, quickly sift through all our great
featured fares by choosing a destination or origin. Be spontaneous. Get out of
town. Current Featured Fares destinations include:

New York, Philadelphia, Dallas, Atlanta, West Palm Beach, and many more.

Note: Featured Fares change often. To see a regularly-updated online list and
purchase our Featured Fares, visit the website at
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eCR703p650a0isj

(Capacity controls and other restrictions apply)

********************************
3.  CO.O.L. TRAVEL SPECIALS FROM ALAMO RENT A CAR

This week, Alamo (R) offers great rates in the following cities. Rates listed
below are valid on compact class vehicles at airport locations listed.  Other
car types may be available. Rates are valid from Saturday, November 4 to
Tuesday, November 7, 2000.
-------------------------------
$19 a day in:  Anaheim, CA         (ANA)
$18 a day in:  Birmingham, AL      (BHM)
$18 a day in:  Buffalo, NY         (BUF)
$20 a day in:  Cleveland, OH       (CLE)
$38 a day in:  Newark, NJ          (EWR)
$18 a day in:  Greensboro, NC      (GSO)
$18 a day in:  Washington Dulles   (IAD)
$18 a day in:  Houston, TX         (IAH)
$20 a day in:  Indianapolis, IN    (IND)
$18 a day in:  Little Rock, AR     (LIT)
$18 a day in:  Milwaukee, WI       (MKE)
$26 a day in:  Pensacola, FL       (PNS)
$18 a day in:  Raleigh Durham, NC  (RDU)
$20 a day in:  San Jose, CA        (SJC)

To receive special Continental CO.O.L. discounted rates, simply make  advance
reservations and be sure to request ID # 596871 and Rate Code 33. Book your
reservation online at:
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eCR703p650a0EoVV
or contact Alamo at 1-800 GO ALAMO.

*If you are traveling to a city or a different date that is not listed, Alamo
offers you up to 20% off their retail rates when you book online at:
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eCR703p650a0EoWW

For complete details on these offers, please refer to Alamo's terms and
conditions below.

****************************************
4.  CO.O.L. TRAVEL SPECIALS FROM NATIONAL CAR RENTAL

This week, National (R) offers great rates in the following cities. Rates
listed
below are valid on compact class vehicles at airport locations listed.  Other
car types may be available. Rates are valid from Saturday, November 4 to
Tuesday, November 7, 2000.
------------------------------------------
$30 a day in:  Albany, NY          (ALB)
$19 a day in:  Anaheim, CA         (AMA)
$19 a day in:  Birmingham, AL      (BHM)
$19 a day in:  Buffalo, NY         (BUF)
$21 a day in:  Cleveland, OH       (CLE)
$43 a day in:  Newark, NJ          (EWR)
$19 a day in:  Greensboro, NC      (GSO)
$20 a day in:  Greenville, SC      (GSP)
$19 a day in:  Washington Dulles   (IAD)
$19 a day in:  Houston, TX         (IAH)
$24 a day in:  Killeen, TX         (ILE)
$22 a day in:  Lansing, MI         (LAN)
$23 a day in:  Lake Charles, LA    (LIC)
$43 a day in:  New York, NY        (LGA)
$30 a day in:  Little Rock, AR     (LIT)
$19 a day in:  Milwaukee, WI       (MKE)
$21 a day in:  Oakland, CA         (OAK)
$19 a day in:  Norfolk, VA         (ORF)
$27 a day in:  Pensacola, FL       (PNS)
$19 a day in:  Raleigh Durham, NC  (RDU)
$19 a day in:  Rochester, NY       (ROC)
$21 a day in:  San Jose, CA        (SJC)

To receive your special Continental Airlines CO.O.L. Travel Specials
discounted
rates, simply make your reservation in advance and be sure to request Product
Code COOLUS.  Make your reservation online or contact National at
1-800-CAR-RENT
(1-800-227-7368).  Book your reservation online at:
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eCR703p650a0D7mv

* If you are traveling to a city or a different date that is not listed,
National offers you up to 20% off their retail rates when you book online at:
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eCR703p650a0DwDK

For complete details on these offers, please refer to National's terms and
conditions below.

****************************************
5.  CO.O.L. TRAVEL SPECIALS ON HILTON HOTELS AND RESORTS

The following rates are available November 4-6, 2000 and are priced per night
--------------------------------------

Airport: Albany, NY (ALB)
Rate:    $120 Hilton Garden Inn Albany Airport, Albany, NY
(Adjacent to Shaker Ridge Country Club; 15 minutes from downtown Albany)

Airport: Cleveland, OH (CLE)
Rate:    $59 Hilton Garden Inn Cleveland Airport,Cleveland, OH (Just two miles
from Cleveland Airport, and only 12
miles from downtown.)

Airport: Washington Dulles, DC (IAD)
Rate:    $109  Hilton Washington Embassy Row, Washington, DC
(Located 1/2 block from DuPont Circle, easy walking distance to shops,
galleries, and museums)

Airport: Washington Dulles, DC (IAD)
Rate:    $89, 11/4-5  Doubletree Washington Park Terrace,
Washington, DC  (Located on the world-famous Embassy Row just six blocks north
of the White House)

Airport: Washington Dulles, DC (IAD)
Rate:    $75, 11/4-5  Hilton Washington Dulles Airport,
Herndon, VA  (Located 2 miles fro IAD airport at the Gateway to the nation's
capital.)

Airport: Washington Dulles, DC (IAD)
Rate:    $89  Hilton McLean Tysons Corner, McLean, VA
(FREE shuttle to the Metro and famous Tyson's I and II shopping)

Airport: Intercontinental Airport Houston, TX (IAH)
Rate:    $78  Hilton Houston Hobby Airport, Houston  TX
(Across from Hobby Airport (free shuttle) - near Astroworld, NASA and
racetracks.)

Airport: Intercontinental Airport Houston, TX (IAH)
Rate:    $99  Hilton Houston Southwest, Houston, TX  (Only
9 miles from downtown Houston, Free shuttle to the Galleria Mall!)

Airport: Intercontinental Airport Houston, TX (IAH)
Rate:    $59, 11/4-5   Hilton Houston Westchase and Towers, Houston, TX
(Walking distance to Spellbinders Comedy Club, restaurants, and lounges!)

Airport: Oakland, CA (OAK)
Rate:    $98  11/4-5  Hilton Garden Inn San Francisco
Airport/Burlingame, Burlingame, CA (Located just 2.1 miles south of the San
Francisco International Airport in the city of Burlingame.)

Airport: Pensacola, FL (PNS)
Rate:    $119 Hilton Sandestin Beach and Golf Resort, Destin, FL  (A 2,400
acre,
beachfront resort playground nestled between the Gulf of Mexico and the
Choctawatchee Bay.)

To book this week's special rates for Hilton Family Hotels, visit and book at:
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eCR703p650a0B3z3

Special rates apply only for the dates listed at each hotel and are subject to
availability.  Check hilton.com for specific dates at each Hilton Family
Hotel.
Or call at 1-800-774-1500 and ask for Value Rates. Restrictions apply to these
rates.

****************************************
6.  CO.O.L. TRAVEL SPECIALS LAST-MINUTE WEEKEND RATES FROM
WESTIN, SHERATON,AND FOUR POINTS HOTELS

--------------------------------------
Allentown, PA      Sheraton Park Ridge Hotel                  $71.00
Allentown, PA      Sheraton Society Hill Hotel                $100.00
Buffalo, NY        Four Points Hotel Dunkirk                  $44.00
Buffalo, NY        Four Points Hotel Niagara Falls            $77.00
Buffalo, NY        Four Points Hotel Buffalo Airport          $77.00
Buffalo, NY        Four Points Hotel Niagara Falls            $199.00
Buffalo, NY        Sheraton on the Falls                      $259.00
Burlington, VT     Sheraton Burlington Hotel                  $91.00
Cleveland, OH      Four Points Cleveland South                $51.00
Cleveland, OH      Four Points Hotel Akron West               $65.00
Cleveland, OH      Four Points Hotel Cleveland East           $69.00
Cleveland, OH      Sheraton Cleveland City Center Hotel       $88.00
Greensboro, NC     Sheraton Imperial Hotel                    $45.00
Greensboro, NC     Sheraton Chapel Hill Hotel                 $55.00
Houston, TX        Sheraton Houston Brookhollow Hotel         $45.00
Houston, TX        Sheraton North Houston at IAH              $58.00
Houston, TX        The Westin Galleria                        $64.00
Houston, TX        Sheraton Suites Houston Near the Galleria  $71.00
Houston, TX        The Westin Oaks                            $71.00
Houston, TX        The St. Regis Houston                      $95.00
Indianapolis, IN   The Westin Indianapolis                    $81.00
Lansing, MI        Sheraton Lansing Hotel                     $80.00
Milwaukee, WI      Sheraton Milwaukee Brookfield Hotel        $80.00
Norfolk, VA        Four Points Hotel                          $103.35
Pensacola, FL      Four Points Hotel Fort Walton Beach        $59.00
Rochester, NY      Sheraton University Hotel                  $84.00
San Francisco, CA  Sheraton San Jose Hotel                    $57.00
San Francisco, CA  Four Points Hotel Pleasanton               $58.00
San Francisco, CA  Four Points Hotel Sunnyvale                $70.00
San Francisco, CA  Sheraton Sunnyvale Hotel                   $169.00

Visit our site for booking these Last-Minute Weekend Rates
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eCR703p650a0D7nw

For complete details on these offers, please refer to the terms and conditions
below.

****************************************
CO.O.L. TRAVEL SPECIALS RULES:
Fares include a $37.20 fuel surcharge.  Passengers returning on January 31,
2000
will not have to pay the $37.20 fuel surcharge.  Passenger Facility Charges,
up
to $12 depending on routing, are not included. Up to Three dollars per segment
federal excise tax, as applicable, is not included.  Applicable International
and or Canadian taxes and fees up to $88, varying by destination, are not
included and may vary slightly depending on currency exchange rate at the time
of purchase. For a complete listing of rules please visit:
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eCR703p650a0Ebng

ALAMO RENT A CAR'S TERMS AND CONDITIONS:
Taxes (including VLF taxes up to US$1.89 per day in California and GST), other
governmentally-authorized or imposed surcharges, license recoupment fees,
fuel,
additional driver fee, drop charges and optional items (such as CDW Waiver
Savers(R) up to US$18.99 a day,) are extra. Renter must meet standard age,
driver and credit requirements. Rates higher for drivers under age 25.
Concession recoupment fees may add up to 14% to the rental rate at some
on-airport locations. Up to 10.75% may be added to the rental rate if you rent
at an off-airport location and exit on our shuttle bus. Weekly rates require a
5-day minimum rental or daily rates apply. For weekend rates, the vehicle must
be picked up after 9 a.m. on Thursday and returned before midnight on Monday
or
higher daily rates apply. 24-hour advance reservation required. May not be
combined with other discounts. Availability is limited. All vehicles must be
returned to the country of origin. Offer not valid in San Jose, CA.

NATIONAL CAR RENTAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS:
Customer must provide Contract ID# at the time of reservation to be eligible
for
discounts. Offer valid at participating National locations in the US and
Canada.
Minimum rental age is 25. This offer is not valid with any other special
discount or promotion. Standard rental qualifications apply. Subject to
availability and blackout dates. Advance reservations required. Geographic
driving restrictions may apply.

TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR WESTIN, SHERATON, FOUR POINTS,
ST. REGIS, THE LUXURY COLLECTION, AND W HOTELS:
Offer is subject to availability. Advance Reservations required and are based
on
single/double occupancy. Offer not applicable to group travel. Additional
Service charge and tax may apply. The discount is reflected in the rate
quoted.
Offer valid at participating hotel only. Offer valid for stays on Fri - Mon
with
a Friday or Saturday night arrival required. Rate available for this coming
weekend only (insert and change dates of weekend each update) Offer available
only by making reservations via the Internet. A limited number of rooms may be
available at these rates.

---------------------------------------
This E-mail message and its contents are copyrighted and are proprietary
products of Continental Airlines, Inc.  Any unauthorized use, reproduction, or
transfer of the message or its content, in any medium, is strictly prohibited.

****************************************
UNFORTUNATELY MAIL SENT TO THIS ADDRESS CANNOT BE ANSWERED.
PLEASE SEND ALL INQUIRIES TO:
mailto:eservice@coair.com

TO UNSUBSCRIBE:
We hope you will find CO.O.L. Travel Specials a valuable source of
information.
However, if you prefer not to take advantage of this opportunity, please let
us
know by visiting the CO.O.L. Travel Specials page on our web site at:
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eCR703p650a0Bt6

TO SUBSCRIBE:
Please visit the CO.O.L. Travel Specials page on our web site at:
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eCR703p650a0Ccp


Here is the revised chart.  Gracias

 <<302P01!.DOC>>

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - 302P01!.DOC


Start Date: 4/21/01; HourAhead hour: 15;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042115.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: HARBOR
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/21/01
  UNIT_ID: HARBGN_7_UNITS


Please decrease deliveries to Eastrans to 0 MMBtu/dy for 10/4/00.

The redeliveries wil be 0 as well.


A Conference call to discuss any comments we may want to make on the CPUC's Proposed Decision in the GIR Proceeding has been scheduled for Wednesday, Oct. 17, 2001 at 11:00 AM Houston/Omaha time and 9:00 AM California time.  The dial-in # is 1-877-795-3687 code: 350955.  In Houston, Conf. Rm. 1336 has been reserved for the call.


Neil,

I shall do the review with pleasure.

Vince

Neil Davies@ENRON
11/07/2000 01:37 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Ashley Baxter - Review

Vince

Sorry I missed you off the list

Neil
---------------------- Forwarded by Neil Davies/Corp/Enron on 11/07/2000
01:36 PM ---------------------------

Neil Davies
11/07/2000 01:36 PM
To: Lara Marie Berry/Corp/Enron@Enron, Marty Chrisman/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Shelly Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Simone Lewis/NA/Enron@Enron, Beth
Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Ashley Baxter - Review

You have all been selected from reviewers for Ashley. Our HR pre ranking will
take place on 14 November therefore I'd be grateful if you could complete her
review by the close of business on 13 November

Thanks for your help with this.

Neil


Attached is a revised Credit Watch listing as of 4/09/01.   Please note that
there are 12 counterparty additions/revisions to the Watchlist for this week.
If there are any personnel in your group that were not included in this
distribution, please insure that they receive a copy of this report.
To add additional people to this distribution, or if this report has been
sent to you in error, please contact Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002.
For other questions, please contact Bill Bradford at x3-3831, Russell Diamond
at x5-7095, or Brant Reves at x3-9897.


I WILL TALK TO LUTZ ABOUT HIS SHARE OF THE LEGAL BILLS.

BASIC MARKETING PLAN FOR STAGE COACH:

1.   MAIL OUT FLYERS TO ALL APT. OWNERS IN SEGUIN  (FOLLOW UP WITH PHONE
CALLS TO GOOD POTENTIAL  BUYERS)
2.   MAIL OUT FLYERS TO OWNERS IN SAN ANTONIO AND  AUSTIN(SIMILAR SIZED
PROPERTIES)
3.   ENTER THE INFO. ON TO VARIOUS INTERNET SITES
4.   ADVERTISE ON CIB NETWORK (SENT BY E-MAIL TO +\=  2000 BROKERS)
5.   PLACE IN AUSTIN MLS
6.   ADVERTISE IN SAN ANTONIO AND AUSTIN PAPERS ON  SUNDAYS
7.   E-MAIL TO MY LIST OF +\- 400 BUYERS AND BROKERS
8.   FOLLOW UP WITH PHONE CALLS TO MOST APPROPRIATE  BUYERS IN MY LIST

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Phillip.K.Allen@enron.com [mailto:Phillip.K.Allen@enron.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 2:44 PM
> To: jsmith@austintx.com
> Subject:
>
>
> Jeff,
>
>      The file attached contains an operating statement for 2000 and a
> proforma for 2001.  I will follow this week with a current rentroll.
>
> (See attached file: noi.xls)
>
> Regarding the Leander land, I am working with Van to get a loan and an
> appraisal.  I will send a check for $250.
>
> Wasn't I supposed to get a check from Matt Lutz for $333 for part
> of Brenda
> Stone's legal bills?  I don't think I received it.  Can you follow up.
>
> When you get a chance, please fill me in on the marketing strategy for the
> Stagecoach.
>
> Phillip
>


FYI.

----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 02/21/2001 09:47 AM -----

	Tim Belden@ECT
	02/21/2001 09:33 AM

		 To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: RTO Advocacy Positions

i concur.

From: James D Steffes@ENRON on 02/21/2001 09:13 AM CST
To: Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@Enron, Steve Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron,
Ron McNamara/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Brown/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: RTO Advocacy Positions

To the discussion I would add the following -

1. Our efforts to push hard zonal markets has not been overly successful.
The opponents of such schemes continue to win converts that the interzonal
and intrazonal congestion costs will be large and that it is very difficult
to get the "right" zones.  Moreover, in markets like ERCOT, the zonal
structure has been co-opted by the large incumbents to frustrate the
development of the market.

2. One solution discussed throughout the East is the "Hybrid" model - LMP in
the real-time and Flowgates to manage forward transmission congestion.  If
structured properly, this allows the power desk to have (a) a real-time
energy market and (b) managable transmission risk.  There are disagreements
between the policy "experts" about Flowgates (see point 5).

3. Our goal is to work within the RTO process and build markets that work for
Enron.  Key goals - 1. single control area for the RTO, 2. real time energy
market with no penalties for unbalanced positions, 3. market hubs (similar to
PJM West) for liquidty, and 4. manageable transmission congestion using
market solutions.

4. I agree with Tim that it is very difficult to come up with "one" perfect
market structure proposal for Enron (both for technical and timing reasons -
California is in a different place than SPP).  We are trying to coordinate
our statements in each of the markets as much as possible.  Most importantly,
and we have had some troubles in ERCOT lately, we need to make sure that
saying something in one market doesn't damage our other advocacy efforts.
Government Affairs is trying to make sure that we push at the right time and
place and ensure that our messages have the necessary context.

5. We still hear some open questions about the best form of market-based
congestion managment (option vs. obligation; use it or lose it).  Christi
Nicolay is having a call on Friday to discuss these issues.  Please contact
her if anyone from your teams should attend.

Call with any other questions.  At some point, we need to ensure complete
agreement of our policy(s) and our advocacy efforts on RTOs.

Jim

	Kevin M Presto@ECT
	02/20/2001 06:35 PM

		 To: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steve
Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: RTO Advocacy Positions

Are you putting words in my mouth Tim.

The East is absolutely adamant about having a liquid real-time energy markets
with a "real supply curve" and a "real demand curve" such that hourly
clearing prices reflect the true economic value of the commodity.   With
respect to the number of hourly price signals within an RTO that is
necessary, that is subject to much debate.   Although I prefer a zonal model
for simplicity reasons, the reality is that congestion is more prevalent in
the East in most of the markets and in order to get a functioning real time
energy market, we may have settle for a limited LMP, in which nodal pricing
is necessary for managing the congestion, but proxy buses are created in
zones (3-5 per RTO) for purposes of real-time energy markets.

Our views, I believe, are still very much aligned, however, I need to make
some progress on the creation of real time energy markets.   The zonal
markets implemented in NEPOOL and contemplated for ERCOT result in a
mis-priced commodity with no "real" price signal sent to the market.   Out of
merit generation is and will continue to be dispatched because the congestion
is managed through energy uplift payments (congestion price signal is not
sent to the market).   This results in a very inefficient commodity market
where the consumer gets screwed and market makers can't price the commodity
or transportation on a forward basis.

I hope this clarifies any misunderstanding.

------------------------------------------------

Steve Walton was in Portland last week and updated me on the latest vision
for RTO's that was developed by the east desk.  This vision seems to differ
somewhat from what we are advocating in the west.  In particular, it seems
like the east has embraced a nodal system while the west is firmly planted in
the zonal / flow-gate camp.  I have asked Steve to flesh out more details of
the nodal approach -- in particular, how do the nodes map to a fairly
homogeneous zone and how does this impact pure trading positions (i.e., a
transaction with no asset being directly scheduled to support it) versus
asset-based trades where the meter must settle with the RTO while the trade
settles with the market.

It may be that the physical characteristics of the east and west warrant
different models.  For example, the west has large, long-distance, high
voltage lines that are very amenable to a zonal approach.  The east has more
local transmission bottlenecks that may not be modeled as easily.  It also
could be that the political reality in the east and west require different
positions.  As things sit now, there is no way that a zonal approach could
fly in the northwest.  In contrast, PJM seems firmly planted in the nodal.
Finally, it could be that the east desk and the west desk have a difference
of opinion on what the "ideal" market structure should be.  If that is the
case, then perhaps we need to talk some more.

Given the different advocacy positions in the east and the west, I don't
think that we can come up with a broad, nationwide advocacy position at this
time.  That is, I don't think that we should endorse either zonal or nodal as
"the answer" at FERC.  Instead, I think that we should focus on the
objectives that RTO's should try to achieve and be flexible as to what the
best market structure should be to achieve these objectives.

What do you guys think about this?

Regards,
Tim


This is a thorough and helpful analysis.  But, have we considered the broader
emergency powers the president might have (i.e. beyond the clean air act
waivers requested by a governor)?  It would seem that the importance of the
defense business in California, the large number of military facilities, the
public safety hazards of widespread blackouts, etc. ought to trigger some
broader authority.

Richard Shapiro
05/21/2001 05:26 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Revised Electricity Emergency Authorities Memo

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 05/21/2001
05:26 PM ---------------------------

Linda Robertson
05/21/2001 03:03 PM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Revised Electricity Emergency Authorities Memo

Here's a first draft of the emergency powers memo Sarah put together with
V&E.  We are still awaiting one more section on the Federal Reserve's
authority.  As you will note, there is remarkable authority vested in the
President, including eminent domain.  Please note page 7, which read in
combination with footnote #4 gives wide authority to the Federal government.
Let's decide soon how we want to use this memo.  Thanks.
 - 140855_1.DOC


Altra's Office
1211 Lamar Suite 950
Houston, TX  77002

Contact:  Tammie Schoppe
xt 3-4220Altra's Office
1211 Lamar Suite 950
Houston, TX  77002

Contact:  Tammie Schoppe
xt 3-4220


Sara:
When ENA enters into an ISDA Master with a Canadian counterparty, is that
counterparty expected to make the ESP and Options rep?  Does ENA make the
Canadian Securities Act rep?

Carol


[IMAGE]
	Friday March 22, 2002	iOTC
			[IMAGE]
			[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]		 RIGZONE [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] 	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]		home    | news    | search    | maps    | data    | jobs    | market    | store  	[IMAGE]
			[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]		      [IMAGE] [IMAGE]      In This Issue [IMAGE]      [IMAGE]     [IMAGE]    Current Oil and Gas Industry News T! op Stories for the Past 7 Days Featured Events and Conferences What's in Store - Books & More     Featured Employment Opportunities Surplus Oilfield Equipment For Sale Worldwide Offshore Rig Utilization Oil & Gas Prices    [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]       Industry Headlines [IMAGE]      [IMAGE]       OPEC Went Over Production Limit in February  OPEC members pumped 779,000 barrels per day above agreed limits in February.  Ocean Rig Sells Two Baredecks to Noble Drilling  Ocean Rig has agreed to sell its two baredeck hulls to Noble Drilling for US $45 million.    [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]    Landmark Graphics Releases SpecDecomp   Landmark Graphics Corporation has released SpecDecomp(TM), a new, innovative reservoir imaging and interpretation technology solution. SpecDecomp provides greater resolution of reservoir boundaries, heterogeneities and thickness than previously possible with traditional broadband seismic displays.  For more information click here .          Exploration [IMAGE]      [IMAGE]     [IMAGE]  Santos' Norfolk-1 Well Could Be Big  The Norfolk wildcat oil well off the coast of Western Australia could hold up to 70 million barrels ! of oil.  4D Seismic Survey Begins Offshore New Zealand  4D Seismic work will begin shortly on the Maui gas field offshore New Zealand.  Saudi Aramco Makes Discovery in Eastern Saudi Arabia  Saudi Aramco has found oil and gas in three wells in the kingdom's eastern province.  Dana Increases UK Portfolio  Dana Petroleum is exchanging UK North Sea assets with Agip.    [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]       Pr! oduction [IMAGE]      [IMAGE]     [IMAGE]  Petrobras Sees Rise in February Output  Brazil's average daily oil production totaled 1.48 million barrels in February.    [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]       Company & Financial News [IMAGE]      [IMAGE]     [IMAGE]  Duke Energy Acquires ChevronTexaco Assets  Duke Energy Field Services has signed agreements to acquire ChevronTexaco's 33.3 percent-ownership interest in Discovery Producer Services, LLC.  Cooper Cameron Enters Into New Revolving Credit Agreement   Cooper Cameron Corporation has entered into a Revolving Credit Agreement with a syndicate of relationship banks led by Bank One, NA.  Unit Corporation Acquires Twenty Drilling Rigs   Unit Corporation has reached an agreement with a privately-held company to acquire twenty drilling rigs and related equipment for 7.5 million shares of Unit Corporation common stock.  Ensco Enhances Ri! g Fleet Communications System  Ensco International will soon begin to install a new communications system onboard all of its Gulf of Mexico jackup rigs.  TotalFinaElf Increases Stake in Oseberg  TotalFinaElf has signed an agreement with the Norwegian authorities to increase its interests in the Oseberg fields in the Norwegian North Sea.    [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]       Last 7 Days Top Stories [IMAGE]      [IMAGE]     [IMAGE]  Halliburton May Divide Into Separate Business Units  Halliburton Co. may separate into two independent subsidiaries by midyear.  Murphy Awards Front Runner Contract  Murphy  has awarded a contract to J. Ray McDermott to construct a Floating Production System for the Fro! nt Runner Project.  Hugo Chavez Could Order Army to Run PDVSA  Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez said on Sunday he would order the armed forces to take over PDVSA if protesting executives and employees tried to halt the company's operations through a strike action.  Rowan Gorilla V Contract Dispute is Resolved  Rowan Companies, Inc. reported that an agreement has been reached to resolve a dispute over the Rowan Gorilla V contract.  Noble Drilling Purchases Two Semisubmersibles  Noble Drilling has agreed to purchase two semisubmersible drilling rigs, the Transocean 96 and Transocean 97 for $31 million in cash.  Kerr-McGee Increases 2002 Budget by 15%  Kerr-McGee Corp. has increased its ! capital budget for exploration and production development projects by 15%, or $120 million, to approximately $900 million.  Brazil To Fund New Exploration Research  ANP has over $430 million designated for research in Brazil, including the gathering of geological data and seismic prospecting which is normally handled by Petrobras.  Kerr-McGee Scores with Navajo   Kerr-McGee Corp. announced three oil and gas discoveries on separate fault blocks at the Navajo field in its core East Breaks area of the deepwater Gulf of Mexico.  Santos To Acquire Esenjay Exploration  Santos and Esenjay Exploration have entered into a definitive merger agreement.  Spinnaker Higher Bidder of 40 GOM Blocks  ! Spinnaker participated in a total of 56 bid submissions, second most by industry for OCS Sale #182.  PanCanadian and AEC Get Green Light  AEC and PanCanadian announced that the waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Act ended on March 18, 2002, without inquiry by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission or the U.S. Department of Justice.  Unocal Adds to GOM Acreage  Unocal was apparent high bidder for interests in 18 blocks in the Central Gulf of Mexico OCS Lease Sale No. 182.    [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]       Upcoming Oil & Gas Industry Events [IMAGE]        [IMAGE]       [IMAGE]  Apr. 2     e-Business in the E?Industry - Targeting the Value  Houston Apr. 7     CORROSION/2002  Denver Apr. 8     Weatherman's Classic Charity Golf Tournament  Houston Apr. 9     2002 SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing Conference and Exhibition  Houston May. 1     Nigeria Oil & Gas 2002  London May. 6     Offshore Technology Conference 2002  Houston May. 13    Introduction to the Petroleum Industry  Houston May. 21    Oil and Gas in the Gulf of Guinea  London Jun. 23    Ocean Mechanics and Arctic Engineering 2002  Oslo Aug. 27    ONS 2002 Conference and Exhibition  Stavanger  list your conference  view upcoming events   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]    [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  Click here to go to Baker Hughes  AADE  Horizon Offshore  HoverDril   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   promote your company      [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  The Management of International Oil Operations  [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  Rules-of-Thumb for the Man on the Rig  [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  Introduction to Marine Engineering 2nd Edition  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   more products   [IMAGE]      [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  featured equipment: Wartsila Generator Sets  [IMAGE]   4 1/2-inch 19.2 Lbs Pipe  [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   more equipment      [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   featured jobs:  - Maintenance Superintendent  - I/E Technician  - Operations Superintendent   more hot jobs >>   featured candidates:  - Sales Engineer  - M.S. Student in Petroleum Engineering  - Management - Operator & Service Company   search for candidates >>   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]      [IMAGE]      [IMAGE]   Drillships:  To 5000':   57.1% (8/14) +5000':   96.0% (24/25)  Semisubs:  2nd Gen:   62.5% (45/72) 3rd Gen:   86.0% (43/50) 4th Gen:   94.7% (36/38) 5th Gen:   85.7% (6/7)  Jackups:  T! o 200':   56.1%  (37/66) 200' MC:   45.8% (11/24) 200' MS:   19.0% (4/21) 300' IC:   88.5% (85/96) +300' IC:   94.4% (51/54) Severe Env.:   81.0% (17/21)  [IMAGE]        [IMAGE]        view complete utilization report           [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  Light Crude Oil:  $25.55/BBL  (2.61%) Brent Crude Oil:  $25.42/BBL  (3.08%) Natural Gas:  $3.37/MMBtu  (9.42%) Unleaded Gasoline:  $0.82/gal  (1.23%) prices from:  3/21/2002 change since: 3/20/2002   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]    [IMAGE]   	[IMAGE]
			[IMAGE]
			  Promotional Opportunities Become a Sponsor, feature your job opening or, advertise your  upcoming industry conference.  Click here  for more information, send your press release to  info@rigzone.com  or call us at 281-345-4040.   Member Services If you no longer wish to receive this newsletter, you may unsubscribe by clicking here  or by logging in to Rigzone and updating your profile.   You can also change the format you receive (HTML or Text) and your email address by logging in and updating your account.   Click here to log in .
			[IMAGE]


Are you going tonight?  I think I'm just going to go tomorrow.  What's happening?  What time is the shower on Saturday?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nytasha.Sims@dynegy.com@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 3:00 PM
To:	Mims, Patrice L.
Subject:	RE: Slow Day

The number is 713-623-4893.

                    Patrice.L.Mims
                    @enron.com            To:     Nytasha.Sims@dynegy.com
                                          cc:
                    10/17/01 02:38        Subject:     RE: Slow Day
                    PM

I did not enjoy it either, I'm glad you said it first.  I'm going to look
up that Clarins Spa and see if I can afford it and then maybe we can go
together.

I'll let you know what I find out.

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   Nytasha.Sims@dynegy.com@ENRON
   Sent:   Wednesday, October 17, 2001 2:13 PM
   To:     Mims, Patrice L.
   Subject:  RE: Slow Day

   Girl please.  I don't know all those hyms myself.  I left right after
   you.
   I tried to flag you down in the parking lot, but no, Sis. Thurston was
   burning rubber.

   Siera's doing much better in math, but she's had a few, low language
   grades.  She's only been tutored once.  Today will be the 2nd day and
   she'll be there two hours instead of one , because Steve picked them up
   early on Monday, forgetting that she had tutoring.  Please continue to
   pray
   for her.
   How's Jordan doing?  What did his teacher want this time?

   We really do need to go to a spa.  I have a gift certificate to
   Institute
   Clarins inside Saks Fifth in the Galleria.  I'll use that soon.

   I really didn't enjoy rehearsal last night.  I don't know what the
   problem
   was.

                       Patrice.L.Mims
                       @enron.com            To:
   Nytasha.Sims@dynegy.com
                                             cc:
                       10/17/01 11:25        Subject:     RE: Slow Day
                       AM

   Hey Sister Sims,

   You were really singing those hymns last night!   How long did choir
   rehearsal last?  I had to go, I was sleepy and, quite frankly, had a
   hard
   time really getting into the hymns for that length of time.  I do need
   to
   look up some of those 2nd and 3rd verses though.......

   How is Siera doing in school these days?  I hope everything is going
   well
   for her.  I still need to get out and look at this other school for
   Jordan
   and see what's going on over there.  His teacher is really very
   immature.
   She called me again yesterday with some silly stuff.

   You know we need to set aside some time to go get massages and facials
   and
   talk.

   Write back

       -----Original Message-----
      From:   Nytasha.Sims@dynegy.com@ENRON
      Sent:   Monday, October 15, 2001 2:51 PM
      To:     Mims, Patrice L.
      Subject:  Re: Slow Day

      Hey girl!!  When I opened up this e-mail I said, "Wow"!!  It has to
   be
      EXTREMELY SLOW to get an e-mail like this!!  Girl you are so-oo
   crazy.
      Sounds like you were a true FOX last night.  Thank goodness you
   weren't
      in
      Chicago, looking like that!!  The outfit sounds cute.  Doesn't it
   make
      you
      feel good when the kids admire you.  I can relate to that warm, fuzzy
      feeling brought on by your child.  I can't wait to see the pictures.

      I'm sorry to hear that you're having plumbing problems.  Did Todd
   call a
      plumber last night?  I wonder how expensive that job will be?

      I'm looking forward to rehearsal also.  Where was V. Michael on
   Sunday?
      I
      was wondering where Samantha had been myself.  I heard that she sang
      with
      the women 5th Sunday.  I was thinking she had gone over to Higher
      Dimensions with Sis. Kaye.  We need to visit that church and see what
      all
      the hupla is.  Do you have a hat for next Sunday?

      After church, I went home & cooked spaghetti.  Steve's cousin was
   giving
      a
      small family b-day gathering for his mom.  I didn't want to go, but
      Steve
      asked me to.  On the way home, he wanted to talk.  He told me how
   much
      he
      loved me, etc...  Yeah, Yeah, Yeah.  It all sounded so familiar.  He
      also
      apologized for the big blow up on Saturday.  He even apologized to
   Siera
      for the things she heard.  She told him that she didn't like the way
   he
      treated her mom.  She really expressed herself.  I was proud of her
   for
      speaking up.  She was very respectful, but got her point across.  I
   felt
      like he was only trying to make peace because he wanted some you know
      what.
      He wasn't getting off that easy.  When we got in bed, he wanted to
      snuggle
      up under me.  I then asked him where he had gone the other night.  He
      immediately got an attitude.  I asked again and he yelled, "Why"!  He
      then
      jumped out of the bed saying something about me questioning him as if
      he's
      6 yrs. old.  I said, "Whatever, you've just confirmed what I feel so
      just
      go on & get out of here."  He's so-oo stupid!  I'm his wife and can't
      ask
      where he's been.  I should know where he is at all times.  I just
   really
      don't have time for his mess.

      So, in what area would you like to purchase a new house?  Write back.

      Nytasha

                          Patrice.L.Mims
                          @enron.com            To:
      IMCEANOTES-Nytasha+2ESims+40dynegy+2Ecom+40ENRON@enron.com
                                                cc:
                          10/15/01 01:18        Subject:     Re: Slow Day
                          PM

      Hey girl,

      What's going on?  It is truly a slow day over here.  So far, I really
      could
      have taken the day off and would not have missed anything.  Last
   night I
      had a date with my mother-in-law.  She's a member of a book club and
      they
      had their 3rd annual literary Gala last night at the Omni Hotel.  It
   was
      nice, but long.  The tickets said it started at 6:00 and I got their
   at
      6:00.  The doggone ticket should have said cocktails at 6:00 and
   seating
      at
      6:45.  I was tired of standing around waiting to be seated.  But,
   girl,
      Ms
      Thang felt so good last night.  I felt like a million dollars in my
      semi-formal attire.  After I left church, I went to one of my
   favorite
      stores, Chico's, and bought myself a nice dressy top to go with my
   floor
      length (not by design, I'm just not tall enough) black skirt.  The
   top
      that
      I bought set it off so nicely.  It was black, light brown and gold!
   I
      wore
      my rhinestone choker and my rhinestone big hoop earrings, not the
   ones I
      wear all the time, but a new pair, much mo' flashy and my black high
      heel
      sandals that show all my foot.  Boy, I felt good about my appearance.
      When
      I came out of the bedroom after getting dressed, Jordan said
      "Mommy.......you look pretty.  Made my evening.  Of course, Bozo the
      husband, didn't say one word.  But I felt good, I even had Jordan
   take
      some
      pictures of me, so we'll see how those come out (smile).

      We have severe plumbng problems I discovered when I got back home,
   Todd
      said the septic tank is stopped up, I have no idea what that really
      entails, but it must of been ugly.  He was pissed!

      Looking forward to rehearsal tomorrow night, speaking of rehearsal, I
      was
      wondering where Samantha had been, and Poiter told me yesterday that
      she's
      back in school, so that's why she's hasn't been there.

      How did your evening go last night?  We still need to talk, maybe
   we'll
      get
      a chance to visit tonight.  Todd already said he wasn't going to be
   home
      until around 11:00 p.m. on Mon, Tues, or Wed, of this week, due to
   Power
      Mart.  I said fine, have fun.  I am so bitter, I'm ready for a change
      too.
      Right now, it doesn't seem like me and the boys would be missing
   much.
      All
      we do is coordinate our schedules to see when we can schedule
   different,
      independent, activities.  Plus, I'm ready for a new house, clean
   break
      and
      new environment.

      Oh well, talk with you later!

      Thanking you in advance for disregarding any and all typos!
          -----Original Message-----
         From:   Nytasha.Sims@dynegy.com@ENRON

      [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Nytasha+2ESims+40dynegy+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]

         Sent:   Friday, October 05, 2001 10:12 AM
         To:     Mims, Patrice L.
         Subject:  Hello

         Hi Tricey!!  How is your day going so far?  Fine, I hope.  I've
   been
         extremely busy.  I'm glad it's Friday.  Well, Siera received her
      report
         card yesterday and it's not good.  I've almost cried myself into
         sickness.
         I don't know what else to do.  I've prayed and given it to God,
   but
      she
         still struggles.  We're seeking some outside tutoring right now.
   The
         4th
         grade teacher at Southwest is going to tutor her.  Keep her lifted
   up
      in
         prayer.  She's pretty much given up completely.  She thinks that
      she's
         dumb
         and that she'll be placed in special education.  She wrote me a
      letter
         last
         night telling me to stop telling her that she's smart, because
   she's
         not.
         She said that she's dumb because her report card says so.  That
   hurt
      me
         so
         bad.

         Lil' Steve's report card was excellent.  He's doing a great job.
   The
         best
         thing we could've done for him was put him at Southwest.

         How's the school search going for Jordan?

   **********************************************************************
      This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
   affiliate
      and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use
   of
      the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or
   disclosure
      by
      others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
   (or
      authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender
   or
      reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
      delete
      all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto)
   are
      not
      intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or
   evidence
      a
      binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
      affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may
   not
      be
      relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
   otherwise.
      Thank you.

   **********************************************************************


Nathan,
Ted Bland is the Enron wholesale person responsible for all recruiting for
one of the business units I support.

I actually spoke with Ted today about you.  He is working on scheduling you
for a meeting, but he has had some difficulty in finalizing schedules.  So,
there is no need to follow up, because he will get with you in a few days.

Hope all is well.

Michelle

"Nathan Wesely" <Nathan.Wesely@roystonlaw.com> on 10/24/2000 01:50:23 PM
To: <Michelle.Cash@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Call from Ted

Michelle,

I received a call from Ted about 10 days ago about a possible
interview.  Ted said he would call to schedule an interview at the
beginning of last week, but I have not heard back from Ted.  I would
like to email Ted to remind him I am still interested.  Who is Ted?
Can you forward his email address?

Thanks for your help!

Nathan Wesely
Royston, Rayzor, Vickery & Williams, L.L.P.
600 Travis, Suite 2200
Houston, Texas 77002
Email: nathan.wesely@roystonlaw.com
Website: www.roystonlaw.com
Telephone: 713.224.8380
Facsimile: 713.225.9945

******************Internet Email Confidentiality
Footer*******************

Attorney-Client Privileged, Attorney Work Product, and Confidential
information may be contained in this message.  If you are not the
addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of
the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message
to anyone.  In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly
notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or
your employer does not consent to Internet email for messages of this
kind.


Here is the PPA request and the list of employees by company, cost center, and supervisor.  This has been submitted to HR.
Donna and Brad