From today's Daily Update, you'll have the opportunity to download
professional perspectives from top analysts at large firms such as
Bear Stearns & Co., Prudential, and Morgan Stanley, plus from
independent Argus Research.

For free research, editor's picks, and more come to the Daily Investor:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/magazinecover.asp?nd=0608#investor
***************************************************************
You are receiving this mail because you have registered for
Multex Investor. To unsubscribe, see bottom of this message.
***************************************************************

======================== Sponsored by =========================
Receive a 4 week RISK-FREE trial subscription to the Financial Times

The Financial Times is your daily briefing on the state of the world.
Click on the link below to get daily reports on companies and markets
worldwide, plus our special reports, delivered to your door.
Subscribe today:
https://www.ftsubs.com/JBE14F267
===============================================================

Featured in today's edition of the Daily Update:

1. TODAY'S SPECIAL REPORT: A study of key industry metrics results in an
investment recommendation for individual energy stocks.

2. DAILY FREE SPONSOR REPORT: Morgan Stanley reiterates its "strong buy"
rating on Sunoco (SUN).

3. FREE RESEARCH REPORT: Prudential revisits its return on invested
capital (ROIC) study regarding the wireless industry.

4. ASK THE ANALYST: Schaeffer's Investment Research Inc.'s Bernie
Schaeffer explains why intermediate-term market risks outweigh potential
rewards.

5. INDEPENDENT'S INVESTMENT REVIEW: Argus Research investigates relative
safety, growth, and speculative stocks among the software industry.

6. PERSONAL FINANCE'S ASK THE EXPERT: Dave MacEwen, senior vice president
and senior portfolio manager for American Century Investments, examines
fixed-income funds.

7. HOT REPORT: Bear Stearns & Co.'s semiconductor capital equipment
analyst assesses the issues facing investors in the industry.

8. INVESTORS' CHOICE: 3-DAY FAVORITE: Jefferies & Co. provides an update
on the fuel-cell industry, and the public and private companies driving
innovations.

9. EDITOR'S PICK: Prudential initiates coverage of the major
pharmaceuticals industry with a "market perform" rating.

10. INFLUENTIAL ANALYST MOVES: The long-term outlook for two stocks in
Internet security solutions and alternative energy generation is bright,
so why have investors recently taken profits?

11. MESSAGE BOARDS: Is down-and-out Lucent (LU) capable of a comeback?
Share your opinion in today's Sage Hot Topic.

======================== Sponsored by =========================
Buy stocks for just $3!  Here's a great way to invest for the long-term.
ShareBuilder lets you make dollar-based investments in the stocks
and index shares you choose.  Transactions cost just $3 ($2 for a
child's account!) and there are no account or investment minimums.

http://service.bfast.com/bfast/click?bfmid=29150849&siteid=38314164&bfpage=home
===============================================================

1. TODAY'S SPECIAL REPORT
Energy storage update --  Friedman, Billings, Ramsey & Co. studies key
industry metrics in its investment recommendation for individual stocks.

As summer demand begins, the firm examines storage and inventory levels,
consumption rates among U.S. regions, July contracts, and investment
opportunities. Seven "buy" rated and two "attractive" stocks listed
(5-page report for purchase - $10).
Click here.
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=20770743&nd=0608

2. DAILY FREE SPONSOR REPORT
Sunoco (SUN) -- Morgan Stanley sets a $47-price target on the U.S.
refining and marketing company.

"Favorable fundamentals are expected to benefit the company," the analysts
write. Register for the firm's free-research trial to access this report
on the "strong buy" rated stock.
Click here.
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=5777295&sid=8&nd=0608

3. FREE RESEARCH REPORT
Wireless industry -- Prudential revisits its return on invested capital
(ROIC) study.

New findings, new conclusions, and new ratings are based on another
quarter's worth of data. In this first part of a two-part series, the firm
explains its model and rankings for the companies in the space. This
report remains free for a limited time.
Click here.
http://www.multexinvestor.com/magazinecover.asp?nd=0608#investor

4. TODAY IN THE ANALYST CORNER
Random thought from the market-sentiment front -- Schaeffer's Investment
Research Inc.'s Bernie Schaeffer explains why intermediate-term market
risks outweigh potential rewards.

Schaeffer feels overly optimistic sentiment may be problematic for the
market. Is he anticipating another sharp sell off in stocks? He will be in
the Analyst Corner only until 5 p.m. ET Fri., June 8, so be sure to ask
your questions now. Ask the analyst.
Click here.
http://www.multexinvestor.com/ACHome.asp?nd=0608

Prepare for the investing week ahead with Bernie's insight to the hottest
sectors and stocks. Sign up for Bernie's FREE e-weekly market report,
Monday Morning Outlook.
Click here.
http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/redirect.asp?CODE=GB01A8&PAGE=1

5. INDEPENDENT'S INVESTMENT REVIEW
Software industry: down but not out -- Argus Research investigates and
finds relative safety, growth, and speculative stocks among the group.

The firm addresses the industry's challenges such as consolidation and
increasing market share, but identifies those companies continuing to
thrive and why they are doing so. 12 stocks are profiled and modeled
(52-page report for purchase - $40).
Click here.
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=20771780&nd=0608

======================== Sponsored by =========================
Save time and money sorting out your personal finances.

Come take advantage of FREE tools and advice on Multex Investor's
NEW Personal Finance channel. Ask our experts your most pressing
questions; learn from real life case studies, and more.

http://www.multexpf.com?mktg=mipftx5&promo=unl
===============================================================

6. PERSONAL FINANCE'S ASK THE EXPERT
Dave MacEwen, senior vice president and senior portfolio manager for
American Century Investments, examines fixed-income funds.

As strong as stocks were throughout the 1990s, bonds also have a role to
play in a diversified portfolio. At times, when stocks take a breather,
bonds can take center stage. Ask the Expert your questions about investing
in bonds. Dave MacEwen will answer investors' queries until Sun., June 17.
Click here.
http://multexpf.com/asktheexpert.asp?target=/personalfinance/asktheexpert/home&nd=0608

7. WHAT'S HOT?
Semi spin -- Bear Stearns & Co.'s semiconductor capital equipment analyst
assesses the issues facing investors in the industry.

Where's the soft landing? Are companies reeling guidance back in? Was that
the bottom? The analyst attempts to answer these and other questions in
this brief report that mentions Applied Materials (AMAT)  (1-page report
for purchase - $10).
Click here.
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=20707961&nd=0608

8. INVESTORS' CHOICE: 3-DAY FAVORITE
Fuel-cell technology -- Jefferies & Co. provides an update on the
industry, and the public and private companies driving innovations.

Everything you want to know about fuel-cell tech and the companies behind
it: Ballard Power Systems (BLDP), FuelCell Energy (FCEL), H Power (HPOW),
Hydrogenics (HYGS), United Technologies (UTX), Plug Power (PLUG) (9-page
report for purchase - $25)
Click here.
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=20697260&nd=0608

9. EDITOR'S PICK: CURRENT RESEARCH FROM THE CUTTING EDGE
Major pharmaceuticals -- Prudential initiates coverage of the industry
with a "market perform" rating.

In this comprehensive report, the firm demonstrates how the group's
performance relative to other sectors of the economy still looks bright.
Of the seven stocks profiled, only three receive the firm's highest rating
(108-page report for purchase - $300).
Click here.
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=20779832&nd=0608

10. INFLUENTIAL ANALYST MOVES
Analysts' calls impact on certain stocks -- Near-term growth questions dog
some high-flyers

After a strong run, shares of widely followed CheckPoint Software (CHKP)
and Capstone Turbine (CPST) have cooled on the heels of cautious analysts'
comments. Writer Dave Sterman explains why.
Click here.
http://www.multexinvestor.com/magazine.asp?ref=ideas20010608.html&nd=0608

11. MESSAGE BOARDS
Sage's Hot Topic

What's your opinion of Lucent's (LU) future? Is the one-time Street
darling capable of a comeback?
Click here.
http://aol.sageonline.com/boards/user/non-frames/message.asp?forumid=13317&messageid=6542&threadid=6542

===================================================================
Please send your questions and comments to:
mailto:investor.help@multex.com

If you'd like to learn more about Multex Investor, please visit:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/welcome.asp

If you can't remember your password and/or your user name, click here:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/lostinfo.asp

If you want to update your email address, please click on the url below:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/edituinfo.asp
===================================================================
To remove yourself from the mailing list for the Daily Update, please
REPLY to THIS email message with the word UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject
line. To remove yourself from all Multex Investor mailings, including
the Daily Update and The Internet Analyst, please respond with the
words NO EMAIL in the subject line.

You may also unsubscribe on the account update page at:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/edituinfo.asp

===================================================================
Please email advertising inquiries to us at:
mailto:advertise@multex.com.

For information on becoming an affiliate click here:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/Affiliates/home.asp

Be sure to check out our other newsletters, The Internet Analyst
and The Telecomm Analyst by Multex.com. The newsletters will
inform, educate, and entertain you with usable investment data,
ideas, experts, and info about the Internet and Telecommunications
sectors. To see this week's issue,
click here:
http://www.theinternetanalyst.com or
http://www.thetelecommanalyst.com


Guys,
FYI,  below is a copy of our final budget numbers for 2001.
mike
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT on 11/10/2000
01:56 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Thomas Myers                           11/07/2000 01:58 PM

To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EGM 2001 Plan

Mike,

Here's the final presentation file with updated funds flow amounts.


Dan,

Per the request of Gerald, attached below is a list of the agreements we have
compiled.  Please check this list to assure that this is a complete and
correct list.

Thanks.

Bob.


those dummies! (it's changed back)

Thanks,
Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
03/20/2001 11:38 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: 3/14

550480-
Kate I just called Prebon and they said they made a mistake the cp should be
Morgan not Merrill........

   Kate Symes @ ECT                03/20/2001 01:27 PM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: 3/14

550480 has been changed to Merrill per Sean Crandall

550383 and 550385 - I'm still waiting to hear from Mike Driscoll on these -
I'll let you know.

Thanks,
Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
03/20/2001 10:53 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 3/14

Hi Kate, Stephanie Checkout with Prebon because I was out last week and I am
still trying to clear up some deals from the 14th.   The west checkout person
at Prebon is on vacation and his back-up is just now getting back with me on
these discrepancies.

Matt Motley
deal 550383
Prebon says cp should be Neveda Power.,..........we have Sierra Pacific

Matt Motley
deal 550385
Prebon says cp should be Neveda Power.......we have Sierra Pacific

Sean Crandall
deal 550480
Prebon says cp should be Merrill Lynch......we have Morgan Stanley


Crandall done
Badeer done
Swerzbin submitted comments on Monday;  feedback will be given to him today - some met some not;  Mike's comments on our feedback due on Monday;  should be in a position to execute next week.
Heizenrader is good on numbers and still talking language.  Final issues relate to language about breaking laws or regulations and all of the accusations that are out there about Enron and it's employees breaking laws and regulations.  Michele Cash has talked to Sanders and Haedicke about this stuff.  Tim H., Michele, Amy Fitzpatrick (HR Generalist in PDX) and I met today.  We think that we have arrived at language that will work for everyone.  Ball is in Michele's court to turn another draft around to us.
Belden - I am good on the numbers.  I have have concerns about indemnity against California and West Power related lawsuits.  I also want to formalize the arrangement that I have with Haedicke with respect to Enron covering my legal fees associated with the west power investigations.  Michele is going to take a cut at some language.  She also needs to convince me that I am covered by the Directors and Officers indemnifications which are part of Enron's bylaws and Delaware law.
Richter - he's been lame about giving me his comments.  I've been lame about riding him on it.  I will do that today.
Wolfe - Greg currently is considering offers from Calpine, AEP, and Enron.  AEP is offering significantly more money.  Greg needs to decide where he wants to work and who he wants to work with.  There is a very real chance that we lose him.  However, we've shown his a great bid, so we will just have to get by if he leaves for a lot of money.  When I say a lot, he is talking about guaranteed 600k per year, roughly.
Motley - has declined our offer.  The total numbers looked good, but he doesn't like Enron options.  If we took his Option value and put it into cash or restricted stock he would be done.  I mentioned it to John and he didn't want to do that.  On the one hand, if that will get him done I think that it's a great outcome.  On the other, we showed him some good numbers and I respect the fact that John wants to keep things consistent.  Tough call.  He did mention that if Enron's Treasury department would let him gamma trade his options withodd lots and no margin requirement that he would take the options.  He has a legitimate point that he has no way of assuring that he can achieve the value of the options.  It's also very hard to argue with an options trader on this point.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Thursday, July 26, 2001 11:23 AM
To:	Belden, Tim
Subject:	How are we doing on the contracts?

Keep hearing silence.............................


When: Thursday, July 12, 2001 2:00 PM-3:00 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 04/02/2001 09:45 AM -----

	Katie Spencer
	Sent by: Brenda Sells
	04/02/2001 08:56 AM

		 To: skean@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: 2000 dividends

1099 information is only produced if an account earns more than $10 in
dividend/interest income.  Your savings for the year 2000 earned $3.96 and
you have the free checking account which is non-interest bearing so there
were no dividends earned on that account.  If you need additional
information, please contact the Financial Services Department at the credit
union at 713-853-6902.

Thank you.


----- Forwarded by Miyung Buster/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 09/29/2000 05:21 PM
-----

	djcustomclips@djinteractive.com
	09/27/2000 09:50 AM
	Please respond to nobody

		 To: 86464@WCTOPICS.djnr.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Utilities, Electric: Deregulation: California Electric Utility
Seeks to Recoup Costs from ...

California Electric Utility Seeks to Recoup Costs from Customers
Rick Burnham
?
09/27/2000
KRTBN Knight-Ridder Tribune Business News: The Press-Enterprise - Riverside,
California
Copyright (C) 2000 KRTBN Knight Ridder Tribune Business News; Source: World
Reporter (TM)

Southern California Edison is asking state regulators for permission to
charge customers for its soaring wholesale electricity costs -- a bill of
nearly $2 billion and growing.

Under the 1996 legislation that deregulated the state's electricity industry,
rates are frozen for the residential and small business customers of Southern
California Edison and Pacific Gas&Electric until March 31, 2002 or until the
utilities pay off their "stranded assets," investments made in nuclear power
plants and other obligations.

That has left the utilities to pay the difference between the frozen rate and
this summer's skyrocketing market rates.

As of Aug. 31, the difference -- known as an undercollection -- amounts to
$1.97 billion for Edison, the company said Tuesday.

Not all details have been worked out, but Edison will file a request later
this week with the state Public Utilities Commission asking for permission to
recoup their unpaid electricity costs after the rate freeze ends, said Jim
Scalacci, its chief financial officer.

Edison officials couldn't say how much the extra cost would add to the
typical Edison residential customer's bill. But if the current $1.97 billion
in undercollections were sought all at once as a rate increase, it would
raise rates more than 20 percent, Scilacci said.

"Of course we would not propose that," Scilacci said. "We would span it over
a period of time."

Instead, the utility will make another filing to regulators later this year
for a "rate stabilization plan" that would include a rate increase and a
mechanism to recover its undercollections over a period of time, Scalacci
said.

The utility said it also would consider other options -- including a lawsuit
-- to recoup the costs.

Sempra Energy, parent of San Diego Gas&Electric, paid off its stranded assets
more than a year ago, allowing it to pass through the full cost of
electricity to its customers.

That resulted in SDGOaverage monthly residential bills skyrocketing from $40
to $68 to $130 in less than three months this summer. After an outcry from
SDGOcustomers, area politicians and consumer groups, the state legislature in
August capped SDGOresidential rates to a maximum of $68 a month.

The deregulated electricity market does not affect customers of municipal
utilities, such as those in the cities of Riverside, Colton, Banning and Los
Angeles.

Under the deregulation law, the investor-owned utilities are able to recover
undercollections from future positive revenues until they recover all
stranded costs or the March 31, 2002 deadline.

Edison believes it already has amassed enough credits through the pending
sale of power plants and the valuation of its hydroelectric properties to
offset its $1.3 billion in stranded assets.

But so far, the PUC has denied requests from the utilities to regain their
uncovered costs after the rate freeze ends. Regulators also have prohibited
the utilities from continuing to collect the charge to offset stranded costs.

Pacific Gas&Electric appealed the PUC's denial, but the Califoria Court of
Appeal denied its petition for review. The case is being appealed to the
state Supreme Court.

Edison believes the PUC -- in refusing to allow the utilities to recoup
undercollections past the 2002 deadline -- is misinterpreting California's
electricity restructuring law.

"That law placed California electric utility companies at risk for recovery
of their stranded costs, but did not place them at risk for recovery of the
costs of procuring electricity for customers," Edison said in a filing with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.

PUC President Loretta Lynch said she recognized that the utilities are
hurting. But Lynch said the ultimate answer isn't to expect consumers to foot
the entire bill.

The action by the utilities also appears to presume that California's
electricity woes will continue, leaving them no way to recoup their costs in
the future, Lynch said.

"The presumption that the market will stay out of whack the next two years is
incorrect," Lynch said. "I would hope the federal government will do
something (about addressing the wholesale electricity market)," she said.

Lynch said regulators will take a look at the total utility picture --
including the revenue utilities continue to make from generating power.
"We'll be asking for the revenue side as well as the expense side," she said.

PUC commissioner Carl Wood, a former Riverside resident, said Tuesday that he
thinks it's unreasonable to assume that just because Edison is making the
request that it will be approved.

Wood said this summer's higher electricity rates have been caused at least in
part by a dysfunctional market and what he calls "unconscionable pricing."

"Edison ought to focus on getting money back from the generators and
suppliers ...," Wood said.

Meanwhile, consumer advocates in San Diego and San Francisco requested that
candidates for state or federal office sign a Ratepayer Protection Pledge to
protect consumers from "unfair and unreasonable electric rates."

The pledge, developed by TURN (The Utility Reform Network), The Foundation
for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights and Consumers Union, was mailed to all
candidates Tuesday.

"Utility-style deregulation has obviously failed, and lawmakers must act now
to prevent the entire state from being thrown into a financial crisis," said
Nettie Hoge, executive director of San Francisco-based TURN.

The consumer groups said that if politicians sign the pledge, they commit to
oppose any legislation or efforts to force ratepayers to pay Edison, PGOor
SDGOretrospectively for this summer's high wholesale energy costs. They also
would agree to "not allow for rate increases for PGOor Edison ratepayers
during the rate freeze period and beyond until such time as rates are just
and reasonable."

TURN and FTCR said they will post a list of all candidates and their position
on the pledge on their Web sites (www.turn.org) and
(www.consumerwatchdog.org).

Folder Name: Utilities, Electric: Deregulation
Relevance Score on Scale of 100: 98

______________________________________________________________________
To review or revise your folder, visit Dow Jones CustomClipsor contact Dow
Jones Customer  Service by e-mail at custom.news@bis.dowjones.comor by phone
at 800-369-7466. (Outside the U.S. and  Canada, call 609-452-1511 or contact
your local sales representative.)
______________________________________________________________________
Copyright (c) 2000 Dow Jones &Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved


Due to recent concerns about the lack of security over wireless networks, all wireless hubs will be disconnected from the Enron network on Tuesday, 3/26.  Enron Network Services will continue to investigate alternative wireless security methods.  If you have any questions concerning this action please, please contact Mary Vollmer @ ext. 33381.

ETS Solution Center - Houston, at 713-345-4745
ETS Solution Center - Omaha, at 402-398-7454


Start Date: 5/1/01; HourAhead hour: 9;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.

    LOG MESSAGES:

ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001050109.txt is empty.
PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001050109.txt
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Insufficient memory for this operation.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database


fyi

Elizabeth Sager
713-853-6349

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cook, Mary
Sent:	Tuesday, October 09, 2001 12:38 PM
To:	Sager, Elizabeth
Subject:	FW: Collateral calculation for the Virtual Transactions Market

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	DDidio@nyiso.com@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, October 09, 2001 11:57 AM
To:	Cook, Mary
Subject:	Collateral calculation for the Virtual Transactions Market

----- Forwarded by Daniel Didio/NYISO on 10/09/2001 10:54 AM -----

                    market_relations@nyiso.com
                    Sent by:                               To:     market_relations@nyiso.com
                    owner-nyiso_tech_exchange@lists.       cc:
                    thebiz.net                             Subject:     Collateral calculation for the Virtual Transactions Market

                    09/11/2001 02:36 PM
                    Please respond to
                    market_relations

market_relations@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion
List:

COLLATERAL CALCULATION FOR APPLICANTS FOR THE VIRTUAL TRANSACTIONS MARKET:

The largest price delta observed at the 97th percentile level during June,
July, and August, 2001, was $159.33. This
amount  should be rounded to the nearest dollar amount ($159.00) when used
in the collateral calculation process..

The collateral formula is as follow:

The price delta of $159.00 is multiplied by the exposure calculation factor
of 14 ($159.00 x 14 = $2,226.00).  This equals the dollar amount of
collateral required per mega watt hour (MWH).  The $2,226.00 is then
multiplied by the maximum number of MWH's the Market Participant may wish
to bid on a daily basis.  The Market Participant notifies the NYISO of the
maximum number of MWH's they  may wish to bid  per day by completing,
executing and returning the  ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND CERTIFICATION OF
UNDERSTANDING OF NYISO FINANCIAL ASSURANCE POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR
VIRTUAL TRANSACTIONS.  This document is attached to Addendum A of the NYISO
Registration Packet dated August 28, 2001.(refer to Page A6 of the Addendum
A).  The NYISO Registration Packet is located on the NYISO web site at:

http://www.nyiso.com/services/relations/cregistration/pdf/nyiso_reg.pdf

The example used in Addendum A stated the Market Participant wished to bid
up to a maximum of 1600 MWH's per day.

In this example, the collateral required would be $2,226.00 x 1600.
Consequently, the collateral requirement to bid up to a maximum of 1600
MWH's per day in the Virtual Transactions Market would be $3,561,600.

Please contact NYISO Customer Relations if you have any questions.

Regards,
NYISO Customer Relations
518-356-6060


Attached are the following:

1.   Staff's 2nd Set of Data Requests to LADWP

2.   Staff's 2nd Set of Data Requests to the City of  Pasadena
 - data request 2 to LADWP.wpd
 - data request 2 to Pasadena.wpd


Hi Dan,

I am of the view that separate guarantees should be put in place.  As a
result, we will forward to Engage later today a revised master agreement
which addresses guarantees which relate solely to Enron Canada Corp.   If you
have any concerns, please let me know.  Otherwise, I will assume that you are
co-ordinating getting the appropriate guarantees relating to Enron North
America Corp.

I can be reached at (403) 974-6708.

Thanks,

Mark

---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Powell/CAL/ECT on 12/04/2000 10:01
AM ---------------------------
From: Russell Diamond on 12/04/2000 10:43 AM CST
To: Mark Powell/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Engage Canada- Credit W/S

Mark,

I had remembered our previous conversation regarding having ENA and ECC on
the seperate guaranty's.  If we need to have two seperate guaranty's please
coordinate with Dan Hyvl to have separate guaranty's issued.  I have attached
another amended credit worksheet which detail the guaranty amounts required.
Please note that as a result of current market conditions, we need to have
the draft contract and guaranty's sent to the counterparty as soon as
possible.  Also my credit contact at Engage is a lady named Sandra
(403-297-1476) and I have reviewed with her our needs, if Suzzi Sethi does
not understand our urgency on this, please communicate this to Sandra.  I
will be out the rest of the week and will not be able to be contacted.

Thanks
Russell.

	From:  Mark Powell                           11/28/2000 07:44 PM

To: Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Engage Canada- Credit W/S

Hey Russell,

We talked about this point earlier (see an e-mail to you dated September 22,
2000) and we agreed that the guarantees would not reference both Enron North
America and Enron Canada Corp.  There were a number of reasons for this (ie.
complexity regarding future amendments, the differences/peculiarities between
Canadian and American law, possible "permanent establishment" issues we had
discussed, etc.).  You may also want to look at the e-mail I sent to you on
September 26, 2000 (re: the East desk deals with ENA).

Is this not the case anymore?  I think it is better to have separate
guarantees for all of the reasons mentioned in the September 22, 2000 e-mail,
the September 26, 2000 e-mail and this e-mail.

Please let me know.

Mark Powell

To: Mark Powell/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Engage Canada- Credit W/S

Hey Mark,

Are you ready for some more fun, I have attached the Credit Worksheet for
Engage Canada.  Please read the comments at the bottom of the worksheet
pertaining to the guaranty's.

Call with any questions.

Russell


Dear Judge Biren:

Pursuant to your instructions regarding procedures for serving testimony and
preparing exhibits, I submit the following information on behalf of Long
Beach.

a,  List of exhibits

    Long Beach intends to offer two exhibits:  Ex. 200, the prepared direct
testimony   of Elizabeth Wright, and Ex. 201, the prepared rebuttal testimony
of  Elizabeth Wright.

b.  estimate of direct and cross-examination time

    Long Beach estimates only a few minutes of direct examination.

    Regarding cross-examination, Long Beach's estimates are necessarily
preliminary and incomplete (apparently I did not receive all of the direct
testimony) in light of the recent filing of rebuttal testimony.  Current
estimates   are as follows:

    Ladd Lorenz, SoCalGas - 4 hr.
    Eric Nelson, SoCalGas - 2 hr.
    R. Thomas Beach, various parties - 2 hr.
    Paul Amirault, Wild Goose - 1/2 hour
    Jeffrey Dasovich, Enron - 1/2 hour
    John Burkholder, Western Hub Properties - 11/2 hour
    Florio/Weil/Yap, Turn, et al - 2 hours

There may be additional witnesses, depending on information at the prehearing
conference.

Patrick Power


Rebecca,  I just talked to Ken and asked him again.  He said that there had
been a couple of developments while he was in London, so he wanted to wait
until he gets back to the office and has a chance to talk to you.  He will be
in the office on Thursday.

Thanks.

Rosie

Rebecca McDonald@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
02/29/2000 01:43 PM
To: Kenneth Lay/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Ghana

Thanks much, Rosie.

Just let me know.

Rebecca


---------------------- Forwarded by Veronica Espinoza/Corp/Enron on
01/19/2001 03:30 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Office of the Chairman                           01/12/2001 07:31 PM

Sent by: Office of the Chairman
To: All Enron Worldwide
cc:

Subject: Managing Director and Vice President Elections

The Managing Director PRC Committee met this week to elect individuals to
Managing Director and Vice President positions.  These employees are
recognized as outstanding contributors to the organization, whose individual
efforts have been instrumental in the continued success and growth of the
company.  We are pleased to announce the election of the following new
Managing Directors and Vice Presidents.  Please join us in congratulating
these individuals on their new appointments.

Managing Director ) Commercial

Phillip K. Allen, ENA (EWS) West Gas Trading - Houston
Franklin R. Bay, EBS Entertainment on Demand - Houston
Timothy N. Belden, ENA (EWS) ) West Power Trading - Portland
Michael R. Brown, EEL ) Executive - London
Christopher F. Calger, ENA (EWS) West Power Origination - Portland
Joseph M. Deffner, ENA (EWS) Treasury & Funding - Houston
Timothy J. Detmering, ENA (EWS) Corporate Development - Houston
William D. Duran, ENA (EWS) Generation Investments - Houston
Robert S. Gahn, EES Commodity Structuring - Houston
Kevin C. Garland, EBS Broadband Ventures - Houston
Ben F. Glisan, Jr., Corporate ) Global Equity Markets - Houston
Robert E. Hayes, ETS COMM Marketing - Houston
Phillip R. Milnthorp, ENA (EWS) Canada Origination & Trading - Calgary

Managing Director ) Commercial Support

Sally W. Beck, ENW (EWS) Energy Operations Management - Houston
Fernley Dyson, EEL Finance & Support Services - London

Vice President ) Commercial

Gregory Adams, EES MMC Management - Houston
Robert Bayley, EEL-UK Origination ) London
Jack D. Boatman, ETS Market Development ) Houston
Rhenn Cherry, EES Assets/Labor ) Houston
Niamh Clarke, EGM (EWS) Liquids Trading ) London
Peter Crilly, EEL-UK Origination ) London
Derek J. Davies, ENA (EWS) Canada Origination ) Calgary
Mark D. Davis, Jr., ENA (EWS) East Power Trading ) Houston
Charles Delacey, Corporate Finance ) Houston
Paul Devries, ENA (EWS) Canada Origination ) Toronto
Christopher H. Foster, ENA (EWS) West Power Trading ) Portland
Jeffrey F. Golden, EES Corporate Development ) Houston
Michael D. Grigsby, ENA West Gas Trading Group - Houston
Troy A. Henry, EES Bundled Sales-Heavy Industrial ) Houston
Rogers Herndon, ENA (EWS) East Power Trading ) Houston
James W. Lewis, EES Underwriting ) Houston
Christopher Mahoney, EGM (EWS) Liquids Trading ) London
Andrew Marsden, EBS Broadband Ventures ) London
John McClain, EBS Broadband Wholesale Origination ) Houston
Kevin J. McGowan, EGM (EWS) American Coal ) Houston
Albert E. McMichael, Jr., ENA (EWS) Gas Commodity Structuring ) Houston
Ermes I. Melinchon, Central America Origination ) Houston
Steven R. Meyers, EES Consumption ) Houston
Lloyd D. Miller, ENA (EWS) Portfolio Management ) Houston
Michael A. Miller, Wind Development / Execution-General Administration )
Houston
Marcello Romano, EBS EEL-Broadband Trading ) London
David A. Samuels, ENW (EWS) EnronOnline - Houston
Per A. Sekse, EGM (EWS) Global Risk Markets ) New York
Edward S. Smida, EBS Video on Demand ) Houston
Mark Tawney, EGM (EWS) Weather Trading ) Houston
Jon Thomsen, EBS Business Development ) Latin America/Canada ) Portland
Barry L. Tycholiz, ENA (EWS) West Gas Origination - Houston
Frank W. Vickers, ENA (EWS) East Gas Origination ) Houston
Amit Walia, Corporate, Corporate Development ) Houston
William White, EBS Global Bandwidth Risk Mgmt ) Houston
Jonathan Whitehead, EEL EA Trading ) Japan
Mark Whitt, ENA (EWS) West Gas Origination ) Denver
John A. Zufferli, ENA (EWS) Canada Power Trading - Calgary

Vice President ) Commercial Support

Beth Apollo, EEL Financial Operations Executive ) London
Marla Barnard, EBS Human Resources ) Houston
Karen L. Denne, Corporate, Public Relations ) Houston
Georganne M. Hodges, ENA (EWS) Trading, Origination & Power Plant Accounting
) Houston
Phillip Lord, EEL Transaction Support ) London
Peggy Mahoney, EES Marketing ) Communication ) Houston
Steven Montovano, Corporate, Government & Regulatory Affairs ) Dublin
Laura Scott, ENA (EWS) Canada Accounting ) Calgary
Richard C. Sherman, ENA (EWS) Transaction Support ) Houston
Gregory W. Stubblefield, EES Financial Planning & Reporting ) Houston
Dennis D. Vegas, CALME International Public Relations ) Houston

Vice President ) Specialized Technical

Sami Arap Sobrinho, ESA (EWS) Legal ) Houston
Merat Bagha, EBS Sales Engineering ) Houston
Justin Boyd, EEL Legal ) London
Mary Nell Browning, EBS Legal ) London
Jonathan Chapman, EEL Legal ) London
Robert D. Eickenroht, Corporate, Legal ) Houston
Mark Evans, EEL Legal ) London
David Forster, ENW (EWS) EnronOnline ) Houston
Janine Juggins, EEL Tax ) London
Peter C. Keohane, ENA (EWS) Canada Legal ) Calgary
Pinnamaneni V. Krishnarao, ENA (EWS) Research Group ) Houston
Travis C. McCullough, ENA (EWS) Finance Origination, Mergers/Acquisitions )
Houston
Michael Popkin, ESA (EWS) SA- Risk Management/Network Integration ) Houston
Elizabeth A. Sager, ENA (EWS) Physical Trading ) Houston
Richard B. Sanders, ENA (EWS) Litigation ) Houston
John W. Schwartzenburg, EECC Legal ) Houston
Michael D. Smith, EES Legal ) Houston
Marcus Vonbock Und Polach, EEL Legal ) London
Jay C. Webb, ENW (EWS) EnronOnline Systems ) Houston

Vice President ) Technical

Donald R. Hawkins, ETS Quality Management ) Houston
John R. Keller, ETS Engineering & Construction ) Houston


Bill/Steve,  I feel comfortable with allocating a total of 350 hrs. for
personal usage in yr2001 to the business units.

In 2000 we operated 5 1/2  aircraft  a total of 4,375hrs.  Net the chairman's
office we did 354hrs of personal usage (Lay 280hrs)

We will not experience the down time in 2001 like we did in 2000 for major
scheduled inspections so consequently additional hours could be flown above
the norm without additional manpower more than we had in 2000.  I estimate we
could still operate at last years total hours due to the fact we still have
more than our budgeted 5 aircraft.  Once we have disposed of the surplus
aircraft we may need to adjust the available personal use hours down slightly
due to availability around business needs.  As long as the personal aircraft
users are flexible with their time and dates I don't see a problem.

Personal Usage yr 2000
Baxter      17.5
Causey     2.6
Cordes      2.0
Fastow    31.3
Frevert    25.6
Hannon  41.4
Horton      3.2
Lay        279.5
Olson      16.6
Pai1           4.6
Rice        57.3
Slilling    22.5
Sutton     21.4
White      95.8
Mark         1.7

I will be in LAX Sunday through Tuesday for an internation helicopter
operator conference but will be reachable through my pager if you have any
other questions.


Just in case you haven't seen this.

gba

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received: by u1.farm.idt.net for foothi19 (with pop daemon (v1.21 1997/08/10)
Wed Aug  9 17:26:15 2000)
X-From_: PhilM@SCDEnergy.com Wed Aug  9 17:09:40 2000
Received: from mail-relay3.idt.net (MAIL-RELAY3.IDT.NET [169.132.8.27]) by
u1.farm.idt.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA23240 for <foothi19@idt.net>;
Wed, 9 Aug 2000 17:09:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lennon.siteprotect.com (lennon.siteprotect.com [64.26.0.10])
by mail-relay3.idt.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e79L9hm03372 for
<foothi19@idt.net>; Wed, 9 Aug 2000 17:09:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from SCD (adsl-63-193-5-30.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.193.5.30]) by
lennon.siteprotect.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA09966 for
<foothi19@idt.net>; Wed, 9 Aug 2000 16:09:38 -0500
From: "Phillip Muller" <PhilM@SCDEnergy.com>
To: "Gary Ackerman" <foothi19@idt.net>
Subject: Hydro solution
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2000 14:09:37 -0700
Message-ID: <000101c00246$20460580$1e05c13f@pacbell.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 6
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000

Here's the latest press release from PG&E

Proposal Uses Hydroelectric Power to Help Stabilize Energy Prices
Business Editors and Energy Writers
EDITORS: Please do not use ``Pacific Gas and Electric'' or ``PG&E'' when
referring to PG&E Corporation or its National Energy Group. The PG&E
National Energy Group is not the same company as Pacific Gas and Electric
Company, the utility, and is not regulated by the California Public
Utilities Commission. Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company do not
have to buy products or services from the National Energy Group in order to
continue to receive quality regulated services from Pacific Gas and Electric
Company.
SAN FRANCISCO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Aug. 9, 2000--
As state swelters through long hot summers, cheap
hydroelectric power will ensure consumers pay less for electricity
Citing broad support from a coalition representing consumer advocates,
business, labor, agriculture and water interests, Pacific Gas and Electric
Company jointly filed an agreement with the California Public Utilities
Commission (CPUC) today to commit the utility's hydroelectric generating
plants to the effort to help provide needed stability in California's
fragile electricity market.
If approved by the CPUC, this settlement agreement creates a compact between
customer groups and Pacific Gas and Electric Company that would enhance the
economic and environmental benefits of the hydroelectric system for the
public. The agreement would supersede current plans for auctioning the
hydroelectric plants to third parties which were filed late last year. The
agreement calls for PG&E Corporation to retain the hydroelectric generation
system within a California-based affiliate. The other signatories to the
agreement include The Utility Reform Network (TURN), the Coalition of
California Utility Employees (CUE), Agricultural Energy Consumers
Association (AECA), California Retailers Association, Sonoma County Water
Agency, and Tuolumne Utility District.
``Parties came together to develop this proposal that will moderate prices,
and combined with the strong leadership steps taken by Governor Davis last
week, will help ensure consumers are protected from the volatility of the
market.'' said Gordon Smith, President and CEO of Pacific Gas and Electric
Company. ``We are gratified to have the support of large and small consumer
groups for this settlement.''
The power produced by these hydroelectric facilities will now be committed
to the market during the periods when the market needs it the most, thereby
reducing price volatility caused by supply shortages. Additionally, the
agreement returns 90 percent of any profits from hydroelectric operations to
customers. This sharing of revenues will act as a natural ``hedge'' for
customers against rising energy prices since, as market prices increase, so
will payments back to customers under the agreement.
``A key component of the settlement is a proposed agreement with the
California Independent System Operator (CAISO) that assures that power from
the hydroelectric assets will not be bid into the energy market in a way
that can raise power prices.'' said Nettie Hoge, executive director of TURN,
and strong supporter of the proposal.
The agreement's key components:
* Provides a revenue-sharing mechanism that returns 90 percent of profits
from the hydroelectric operations to customers
* Establishes a market value of $2.8 billion for the hydroelectric system
that can be used immediately to pay down ratepayer cost obligations
* Commits PG&E Corporation to establish a $70 million fund to enhance
environmental quality, water quality, and recreational opportunities
* Commits PG&E Corporation to donate or protect through conservation
easements approximately 140,000 acres of watershed lands for public use
* Honors all existing water agreements with downstream users
* Protects agricultural uses of the water
* Ensures the facilities will continue to be operated by a highly qualified
union workforce
``This settlement benefits both California consumers and PG&E's employees,''
said Jack McNally, Business Manager of IBEW 1245. ``Consumers will be
assured that hydroelectric plants will continue to be operated by the same
dedicated employees, will continue to provide low cost reliable energy to
California consumers, and will continue to be owned by a California company.
IBEW 1245 represents the union members who operate and maintain the
hydroelectric system.
``This agreement represents a fair valuation of the hydroelectric system,''
said Michael Boccadoro, director, Agricultural Energy Consumers Association,
``this agreement also protects the long-standing beneficial relationship
between the hydro operations and the agricultural users in the state.''
The settlement agreement filed at the CPUC will be subject to public
hearings and review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Interested parties will be able to provide comment prior to any CPUC
decision. Also, the hydroelectric system transfer requires approval from the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC).
``The CEQA review process itself will ensure that there are no significant
environmental impacts as a result of this transfer,'' said Gordon Smith.
``In addition, keeping the hydroelectric facilities and associated watershed
lands together protects the public interest in these assets.''
The system includes 174 dams, 68 powerhouses, 360 miles of canals, tunnels,
and flumes, and approximately 140,000 acres of watershed land. The
hydroelectric system has a capacity of 3,896 megawatts, and provides a
clean, renewable, low-cost source of electricity particularly during periods
of high demand. The system currently delivers about 5 percent of
California's yearly electricity needs, and up to 10% of the State's
electricity demand during hot, summer days.
``We have enjoyed a positive working relationship with the folks at PG&E for
many years,'' said Tim McCullough, manager of the Tuolumne Utilities
District. ``This agreement ensures the water resource will continue to be
managed in a way that protects the interests of Tuolumne County residents.''
This agreement differs substantially from the transfer contemplated through
legislation at the end of August last year. The 1999 Legislative proposal
did not include the price stabilizing revenue sharing mechanism. Although
the 1999 legislative package ultimately failed to achieve consensus because
of the immense complexities of balancing interests through legislative
compromise, this year's regulatory filing fulfills the directives of the
1996 restructuring legislation and provides the kind of public and state
environmental review that will forge consensus.
PG&E Corporation, with 1999 operating revenues of almost $21 billion and
operations in 21 states, markets energy services and products throughout
North America through its National Energy Group. PG&E Corporation's
businesses also include Pacific Gas and Electric Company, the Northern and
Central California utility that delivers natural gas and electricity to one
in every 20 Americans.


I'll be out of the office until November 28th
Please contact Simon Taylor in an emergency (0207
783 6381)


I love technology!!!!!
Nathalie
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michel Cahier" <sbofni@yahoo.com>
To: <emca@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 5:03 PM
Subject: *EMCA* here are some pics

> i took 3 pics
> michel
> --- Hilary Smith <hsmith3@attglobal.net> wrote:
> > I just took some pictures of Lake Bomar using old
> > fashioned film which we
> > probably won't develop for weeks.  If someone has a
> > digital camera and
> > could e-mail me a couple of pictures, I could print
> > them and take them to
> > Ada Edwards' office Monday.
> >
> >
> > Hilary
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > At 02:35 PM 3/1/2002 -0600, you wrote:
> >
> > >>>>
> >
> > <excerpt>anyone interested in seeing how swampy the
> > lake gets - drive
> > down Bomar toward taft and you'll see the "site" of
> > discussion. A little
> > rain goes a long way...
> >
> > Nathalie
> >
> >
> >
> <center><bold><color><param>0000,3333,9999</param><smaller>Yahoo!
> > Groups
> > Sponsor</smaller></color></bold>
> >
> >
> <fontfamily><param>arial</param><smaller>ADVERTISEMENT
> >
> >
>
</smaller></fontfamily><<http://rd.yahoo.com/M=215002.1818248.3328688.126177
4/D=egroupweb/S=1705044493:HM/A=847665/R=0/*http://ads.x10.com/?bHlhaG9vbW9u
c3RlcjcuZGF0=1015014623%3eM=215002.1818248.3328688.1261774/D=egroupweb/S=170
5044493:HM/A=847665/R=1>
> >
> > </center>
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> >
> > emca-unsubscribe@egroups.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the
> > <<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>Yahoo! Terms of
> > Service.
> >
> > </excerpt><<<<<<<<
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > (Mr.) Hilary Smith
> >
> > 712 Bomar St.
> >
> > Houston TX  77006-1316
> >
> > 713.523.0559
> >
> > Fax: 713.523.3928
> >
> > Website:
> >
>
<underline><color><param>0000,0000,ffff</param>http://pws.prserv.net/hilary<
/color></underline>
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Greetings - Send FREE e-cards for every occasion!
> http://greetings.yahoo.com
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> emca-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
FREE COLLEGE MONEY
CLICK HERE to search
600,000 scholarships!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/iZp8OC/4m7CAA/ySSFAA/NoOolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
emca-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


No need to copy trading.

Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Forster, David
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 4:50 PM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.
Subject:	Options Session

Kevin,

Iris Mack is planning to run an hour-long session on Mon, Nov. 5 (1:00-2:00) providing an "Introduction to Options". If successful, this will be followed up with further Monday sessions going into more detail and complexity.

I am planning to send an email out shortly to Origination encouraging people to attend. Would you like me to include Trading in the email?  Or would you like me to forward the text to you for forwarding to trading?

Dave


Hi Mark:

I'll put the tickets in the mail today.

Joel will be happy to answer any and all of your questions when you see him on the boat.
He is at the Annapolis boat show now until 10/11.

We are looking forward to seeing you on the boat in Fort Lauderdale.

Best Regards,
Vela for Joel F. Potter
Cruising Yacht Specialist
Amel's Sole Associate for the Americas

-----Original Message-----
From: Taylor, Mark E (Legal) [mailto:Mark.Taylor@ENRON.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 6:20 PM
To: jfpottercys@worldnet.att.net
Subject: RE: Ft. Lauderdale Boat Show

Thanks Vela.  My office address is fine.

Just so you know ahead of time what some of my questions will be:

1.  I'm a little concerned about the safety of in-mast furling systems
generally.  What happens if it jams in a blow?
2.  Are the heads both electric?  Will they operate manually if you lose
power?
3.  The boat seems remarkably well equipped.  What sorts of additional
items are usual to purchase before she's ready to cruise?
4.  How do U.S. owners deal with the voltage issues and electrical
repairs and replacements?
5.  Finally, and I suppose of least importance, I'm not thrilled with
the teak-look deck or the blue cabin sole.  Any hope of a manufacturing
change?

Thanks again and I'm looking forward to seeing you in Ft. Lauderdale!

Mark

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	"Joel F. Potter" <jfpottercys@worldnet.att.net>@ENRON
> [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Joel+20F+2E+20Potter+22+20+3Cjfpottercys+40world
> net+2Eatt+2Enet+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
> Sent:	Tuesday, October 02, 2001 4:17 PM
> To:	Taylor, Mark E (Legal)
> Subject:	RE: Ft. Lauderdale Boat Show
>
> Dear Mark:
>
> Thank you for your email.
>
> We will be located at Pier 66, dock C-64.
>
> If you would like I can send you boat show tickets for Saturday and
> Sunday to your office
> address that you have listed. Or if you prefer we can send them
> elsewhere.   Please let us
> know.
>
> Best Regards,
> Vela for Joel F. Potter
> Cruising Yacht Specialist
> Amel's Sole Associate for the Americas
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Taylor, Mark E (Legal) [mailto:Mark.Taylor@ENRON.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 5:46 PM
> To: jfpottercys@worldnet.att.net
> Subject: RE: Ft. Lauderdale Boat Show
>
>
> Joel:
>
> Thanks for your note back.  Unfortunately I don't get into town until
> quite late on Friday evening so Saturday and Sunday are the only days
> I
> can make it.  Do you know yet where you'll be located?
>
> Mark
>
> >  -----Original Message-----
> > From: 	"Joel F. Potter" <jfpottercys@worldnet.att.net>@ENRON
> >
> [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Joel+20F+2E+20Potter+22+20+3Cjfpottercys+40world
> > net+2Eatt+2Enet+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
> > Sent:	Friday, September 28, 2001 4:44 PM
> > To:	Taylor, Mark E (Legal)
> > Subject:	RE: Ft. Lauderdale Boat Show
> >
> > Dear Mark:
> >
> > No appointment is needed but Trade Day (Thursday) is usually
> > best/least busy day to come
> > aboard.  Shall I send you some tickets for that day?  If you would
> > like them please send
> > me your mailing address.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Joel F. Potter
> > Cruising Yacht Specialist
> > Amel's Sole Associate for the Americas
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Taylor, Mark E (Legal) [mailto:Mark.Taylor@ENRON.com]
> > Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 3:55 PM
> > To: jfpottercys@att.net
> > Cc: TedBockius@spherion.com
> > Subject: Ft. Lauderdale Boat Show
> >
> >
> > I understand that you will have an Amel at the Ft. Lauderdale boat
> > show
> > next month.  Do I need an appointment to see the boat?
> >
> > Mark Taylor
> > Vice President and General Counsel
> > Enron Wholesale Services
> > 1400 Smith Street - EB3892
> > Houston, Texas 77008
> > (713)853-7459
> > (713)646-3490 (fax)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> **********************************************************************
> > This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
> > affiliate and may contain
> > confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
> intended
> > recipient (s). Any
> > review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly
> > prohibited. If you are not
> > the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient),
> > please contact the
> > sender or reply to Enron Corp. at
> > enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
> > copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are
> > not intended to be an
> > offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and
> > enforceable contract
> > between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended
> > recipient or any other
> > party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract
> > by estoppel or
> > otherwise. Thank you.
> >
> **********************************************************************
> >
>


June-August were incorrect in Sitara.  I have made the necessary
adjustments.  Stephanie will have to reissue payments.  By my calculations,
Cabot owes HPL $16,050.
See Below

Month  Volume/d Rate was Rate Should Be   Economics
6/99    5000     $2.09      $2.20      $ (16,500)     This Should be Sharp's
expense as this was pre-merger.
7/99    5000     $2.14      $2.20      $ (9,300)        This Should be the
desk's
8/99           5000     $2.47      $2.20      $ 41,850         This Should be
the desk's
                                         $ 16,050

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Melissa Graves                           01/26/2000 03:04 PM

To: Stephanie Gomes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Cabot Oil & Gas Marketing Corp. - 9/99 production - price

Eric,

Why would this ticket only affect Sept. and not the other months?

Melissa

	From:  Stephanie Gomes                           01/26/2000 02:47 PM

To: Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Cabot Oil & Gas Marketing Corp. - 9/99 production - price

I am only showing a price adjustment for 9/99.  No adjustments for June-
August occurred.

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Melissa Graves                           01/26/2000 01:43 PM

To: Stephanie Gomes/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Cabot Oil & Gas Marketing Corp. - 9/99 production - price

Stephanie,

The deal ticket that Eric mentions below that changed the tiered pricing is
EW5406.1 (which fixes the price to $2.35 from 6/1/99-9/30/99).

I was wondering if you showed price adjustments to June-August, in addition
to September (since this ticket affects all months).

Let me know, and then I'll call Laurie Clarkson with Cabot Oil & Gas and ask
her to run this past her trader (Kent Beard) and make sure we are all on the
same page.

Thanks,
Melissa
---------------------- Forwarded by Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT on 01/26/2000
01:12 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Eric Bass                           01/26/2000 11:46 AM

To: Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Cabot Oil & Gas Marketing Corp. - 9/99 production - price

I show five fixed for float swaps done for September Production.  The deal
numbers and prices follow:

   Deal #                 Vol         Swap Px           Resulting Customer Px
ES5823.20        5,000/d        $2.21                          $2.10
ES5823.21        5,000/d        $2.21                          $2.10
ES5823.30        10,000/d      $2.7475                     $2.5975
EW2883.1         10,000/d       $2.265                       $2.155
EW5406.1          5,000/d       $2.35
$2.15

Let me know if this clears everything up.

Eric
x3-0977

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Melissa Graves                           01/26/2000 11:17 AM

To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stephanie Gomes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Cabot Oil & Gas Marketing Corp. - 9/99 production - price

Eric,

Can you please help per Stephanie's note below.  The audit record shows that
you changed the tiered pricing on this Cabot deal for 9/99.  Both Stephanie
and myself thought that Cabot and HPL were in agreement on these prices for
September.  Can you provide insight into why the tiers were changed for this
month?

Thank you,
Melissa
---------------------- Forwarded by Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT on 01/26/2000
11:14 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Stephanie Gomes                           01/26/2000 10:43 AM

To: Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Cabot Oil & Gas Marketing Corp. - 9/99 production - price

Melissa,

Someone has changed one of the price tiers on Cabot for 9/99 production.  Due
to the price change, it is now showing that I need to take a credit of $
52,996.72 from Cabot.  Is this correct or not????  I thought we had figured
the pricing out for 9/99 and Cabot had also agreed.  Please let me know if
the price change is correct or not, and if I need to take this credit from
Cabot.  See below the change that was made in Sitara and I am also showing
what we paid versus what is now showing up in the system.

Original payment ( per your email below )

          0  -  10,000  $2.1000
10,001  -  20,000  $2.1550
20,001  -  30,000  $2.5975
30,001  +  $2.7100

Change that has been made in system

          0  -  10,000  $2.1000
10,001  -  20,000  $2.1550
20,001  -  30,000  $2.5975
30,001  -  35,000  $2.1500
35,001  -  50,000  $2.7100

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Melissa Graves                           11/01/99 02:28 PM

To: Shawna Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Gomes/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jill T Zivley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janelle Scheuer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Cabot Oil & Gas Marketing Corp. - Amendment and Confirmations to
Contract dated 12/1/98

Shawna,

Per my voice mail, please add the following confirmations in addition to the
items you are sending to Cabot:

 Period of Delivery:  September 1999
 Price:    $2.7475
 Flexible Pricing Volume:  10,000/d
 Date Agreed:   8/9/99

 Period of Delivery:  November 1999
 Price:    $2.925
 Flexible Pricing Volume:  5,000/d
 Date Agreed:   10/13/99

 Period of Delivery:  November 1999
 Price:    $2.9325
 Flexible Pricing Volume:  10,000/d
 Date Agreed:   10/13/99

 Period of Delivery:  November 1999
 Price:    $2.935
 Flexible Pricing Volume:  10,000/d
 Date Agreed:   10/20/99

Stephanie,

Below, please find the revised pricing matrix.  Please adjust Sitara and pay
Cabot accordingly:

SEPTEMBER:
0 - 10,000 HSC fixed at $2.21 $2.21-$0.11= $2.10  Have deal ticket
10,001 - 20,000 HSC fixed at $2.10 $2.265-$0.11= $2.155  Per deal ticket,
requested copy
20,001 - 30,000 HSC fixed at $2.7475 $2.7475-$0.15= $2.5975  Per deal ticket,
requested copy
30,001+      $2.91-$0.20= $2.71  Per original contract

NOVEMBER:
0 - 5,000 HSC fixed at $2.925 $2.925-$0.11= $2.815  Per deal ticket,
requested copy
5,001 - 15,000 HSC fixed at $2.9325 $2.9325-$0.11= $2.8225  Per deal ticket,
requested copy
15,001 - 20,000 HSC fixed at $2.935 $2.935-$0.11= $2.825  Per deal ticket,
requested copy
20,001   -  25,000 HSC fixed at $2.935 $2.935-$0.15= $2.785  Per deal ticket,
requested copy
25,001 - 30,000    $HSC -$0.15= $PRICE  Per original contract
30,001+      $HSC-$0.20= $PRICE  Per original contract

Thank you,
Melissa Graves
X39173
---------------------- Forwarded by Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT on 11/01/99 02:15
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Melissa Graves                           10/18/99 11:16 AM

To: Shawna Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Gomes/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jill T Zivley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janelle Scheuer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Cabot Oil & Gas Marketing Corp. - Amendment and Confirmations to
Contract dated 12/1/98

Shawna,

Per my voice mail, please send the amendment to the above referenced
contract, to allow for Flexible Pricing transactions.  (Jill Zivley has
reviewed and approved the draft amendment.)  Please also attach confirmations
with the following details regarding Flexible Pricing deals that have been
done with Cabot Oil & Gas Marketing Corp.:

 Period of Delivery:  May 1999
 Price:    $2.035
 Flexible Pricing Volume:  10,000/d
 Date Agreed:   3/7/99

 Period of Delivery:  Jun 1999 - Aug 1999
 Price:    $2.10
 Flexible Pricing Volume:  5,000/d
 Date Agreed:   4/8/99

 Period of Delivery:  Jun 1999 - Aug 1999
 Price:    $2.05
 Flexible Pricing Volume:  5,000/d
 Date Agreed:   4/7/99

 Period of Delivery:  Jun 1999 - Sept 1999
 Price:    $2.21
 Flexible Pricing Volume:  10,000/d
 Date Agreed:   5/12/99

 Period of Delivery:  Sept 1999
 Price:    $2.265
 Flexible Pricing Volume:  10,000/d
 Date Agreed:   4/22/99

 Period of Delivery:  Oct 1999
 Price:    $2.565
 Flexible Pricing Volume:  15,000/d
 Date Agreed:   7/26/99

The address for Cabot is:

Cabot Oil & Gas Marketing Corporation
P. O. Box 4544
Houston, Texas  77210

Stephanie,

Below, please find the revised pricing matrix.  Please adjust Sitara and pay
Cabot accordingly:

MAY:
0 - 10,000 HSC fixed at $2.035 $2.035-$0.11= $1.925  Have deal ticket
10,001 - 20,000    $2.35 - $0.11= $2.24   Per original contract
20,001  - 30,000    $2.35 - $0.15= $2.20  Per original contract
30,001+      $2.35 - $0.20= $2.15  Per original contract

JUNE AND JULY AND AUGUST (same for both months):
0 - 5,000 HSC fixed at $2.05 $2.05-$0.11= $1.94  Have deal ticket
5,001 - 10,000 HSC fixed at $2.10 $2.10-$0.11= $1.99  Have deal ticket
10,001 - 20,000 HSC fixed at $2.21 $2.21-$0.11= $2.10  Have deal ticket
20,001 - 30,000    $2.24-$0.15= $2.09 June Per original contract
      $2.29-$0.15= $2.14 July Per original contract
      $2.62-$0.15= $2.47 August Per original contract
30,001+      $2.24-$0.20= $2.04 June Per original contract
      $2.29-$0.20= $2.09 July Per original contract
      $2.62-$0.20= $2.42 August Per original contract
SEPTEMBER:
0 - 10,000 HSC fixed at $2.21 $2.21-$0.11= $2.10  Have deal ticket
10,001 - 20,000 HSC fixed at $2.10 $2.265-$0.11= $2.155  Per deal ticket,
requested copy
20,001 - 30,000    $2.91-$0.15= $2.76  Per original contract
30,001+      $2.91-$0.20= $2.71  Per original contract

OCTOBER:
0 - 15,000 HSC fixed at $2.565 $2.565-$0.11= $2.455  Per deal ticket,
requested copy
15,001 - 20,000    $2.54-$0.11= $2.43  Per original contract
20,001 - 30,000    $2.54-$0.15= $2.39  Per original contract
30,001+      $2.54-$0.20= $2.34  Per original contract

Thank you,
Melissa Graves
X39173


yes


I don't see any immediate problem.  As long as the advertising didn't
interfere with the effectiveness and efficiency of Hot Tap as a tool for
satisfying our posting and notice obligations, FERC shouldn't care.  The
revenue would be nonjurisdictional and would be treated as such in Northern's
or TW's next rate case.  As to the "type of advertising," I can't think of a
legal or regulatory reason we need to be picky, but we may want to exclude
certain types of services that seem to rely heavily on internet advertising
if you know what I mean.  DF

Steve Hotte
10/18/2000 01:06 PM
To: Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Danny McCarty/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Julia
White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Advertising.

Shelly/Drew,

We  get quite a bit of customer activity on our Hot Tap internet site.  Do
you think there would be any legal or regulatory restriction on us offering
advertising on that site.  We can be selective on the type of advertising,
but would obviously want to choose a vendor that would benefit from exposure
to the Hot Tap audience.

The revenue from such an idea varies.  If it passes the legal and regulatory
test I will look into potential customers and firm up some figures.

Thanks,
Steve


Louise:

I am happy to provide you with the short form GTC today.  However, I believe that an on-line EEI will receive quicker market acceptance than the GTCs and that as a result more counterparties will start trading on-line in a shorter period of time.

I have attached below a revised version of the on-line EEI for your consideration.

The on-line EEI is a very long document, I agree.  But there are now only 2 pages of Netco changes to the EEI that our counterparties will have to review, as opposed to 8 two column pages of GTCs.  (I have spoken with Elizabeth about how best to ensure quick acceptance of the on-line documentation, and we decided to cut our other changes to the EEI down to the bare bones.)  The EEI is a widely accepted power contract, and I believe that a large number of our counterparties will prefer to trade pursuant to an on-line EEI over a GTC.  (fyi, EPMI has 98 executed EEI contracts.)

Please call me so that we can discuss.  I'd really like a chance to convince you that the EEI is the way to go before we launch with the GTCs.

Thanks,

Leslie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Friday, January 11, 2002 10:27 AM
To:	Forster, David
Cc:	Hansen, Leslie; Taylor, Mark E (Legal); Taylor, Mark E (Legal); Cook, Mary; Sager, Elizabeth; St. Clair, Carol; Nettelton, Marcus; Portz, David; Forster, David
Subject:	RE: Power GTC

I am thoroughly confused - we are not putting the master on line.  Where is the short form GTC?  Please provide short form GTC today -  thanks.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hansen, Leslie
Sent:	Thursday, January 10, 2002 1:57 PM
To:	Kitchen, Louise
Cc:	Taylor, Mark E (Legal); Cook, Mary; Sager, Elizabeth; St. Clair, Carol; Nettelton, Marcus; Portz, David; Forster, David
Subject:	Power GTC

Louise:

Attached please find the GTCs for power (with and without credit).  Please note that we are actually using the EEI Master Agreement as the on-line contract, as opposed to the traditional GTCs.  We were actually in the process of making this transition on EOL this fall, and Kevin Presto and Tim Belden have endorsed Netco's use of the EEI on-line.

Please let me know if you have any questions or comments.

Leslie

 << File: Netco Online EEI with Credit v.2.doc >>  << File: Netco Online EEI v.2.doc >>


SkyGen Presentation


Jay's suggestion.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kurt Anderson/EWC/Enron on 04/18/2002
10:45 AM ---------------------------

Jay Godfrey
04/18/2002 10:28 AM
To: Kurt Anderson/EWC/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject:


I don't know if she has registered yet so I've come up with a few items that I think the baby will need.  Please share this humble list with the appropriate people.  I do work for a bankrupt company you know.

Item			Price
2002 Range Rover 	$64,896             http://www.edmunds.com/new/2002/landrover/rangerover/index.html
2002 Porsche Boxster	$50,000		http://www.edmunds.com/new/2002/porsche/boxster/index.html
Terri Hatcher		$$$		http://www.eonline.com/Facts/People/Bio/0,128,19,00.html
Natilie Imbruglia		$$$$		http://www.eonline.com/Facts/People/Bio/0,128,67918,00.html
Toshiba Big Screen	$2,189		http://electronics.cnet.com/electronics/0-6342372-1304-7297512.html?tag=pdtl-list
Harley Davidson		$21,000		http://www.harley-davidson.com/motorcycles/motorcycles_detail.jsp?PRODUCT%3C%3Eprd_id=432813&FOLDER%3C%3Efolder_id=440145&bmUID=1015517216967
Blue Wave Boat		$18,000		http://striperguide.tripod.com/bluewave.htm

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Wahlstrom, Scottie J" <Scottie.J.Wahlstrom@Williams.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, March 06, 2002 4:06 PM
To:	'stanthemusicman@mindspring.com'; 'hayes@houston.rr.com'; 'rwschatzman@aol.com'; 'rulin01@aol.com'; 'suzzanne.calcagno@ubswenergy.com'; 'mmcg@pdq.net'; Germany, Chris; Alatorre, Hector; Alvarado, Orlando; Anderson, Toi; Aschermann, Leneva; Barnes, Pam; Baumgarten, Julie; Beaty, Beverly; Beltran, Andrea; Bowman, Terri; Buhrke, Cathy; Burton, Charlotte; Camardello, Marg; Casey, Melissa; Catlett, Laurie; Corley, James; Cortez, Diama; Cox, Ann; Cunningham, Larry; Dees, Debra; Doyle, Ronald; Eaton, John; Egner, Paul; Esparza, Delma; Ferazzi, Frank; Fitch, Terry; Gallerano, John; Gensler, Quentin; Glenn, David; Goetze, Ronald; Granoff, Virginia; Gredell, Paul; Green, Margie; Hall, Judy; Hargrove, Nancy; Harris, Joan; Heiser, Suzanne; Helburg, Charles; Higginbotham, Keith; Hungate, Cynthia; Hutson, Charlotte; Kelley, Nancy; Kleiner, Margaret; Laird, Mary; Laughlin, Helen; Laurel, Elizabeth; LeJune, Mark; Loggins, Kenneth; McBeath, K Mark; McGrath, John; Miksovsky, Nancy; Monley, John; Mott, Louella; Muenster, Kay; Payne, Leon; Prevott, Rose; Prevott, Steve; Prodoehl, Paul; Puig, Michael; Robertson, Constance; Robinson, Irene; Rogers, Carl; Runnels, Austra; Rush, Russell; Sansom, William; Schneider, Linette; Schoellkopf, David; Scott, Mark; Shaull, Barbara; Silvas, Elizabeth; Smith, Elsie; Taylor, Charles; Taylor, Janice; Wahlstrom, Scottie; Walleck, Lynn
Subject:	INGRID'S BABY SHOWER

 - ingrid shower.doc << File: ingrid shower.doc >>


Please transfer the storage balance of 420 dth from contract 530750 to VNG
contract 300008.

Thanks


Since I do not track actual volume flows , you probably can contact Morgan at
ext 36406.  She handles border flows.


Shelley:

Attached is the start of the communications plan.  There are many more issues to cover but the balance will be how much detail to provide executives.

Let me know where you want to go from here.

Brad

I will be sending this to the group (Scott A., Jean M, Toby, John. B, Kim P) for further comments.


calendar
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 11/13/2000 07:26 AM -----

	Paul Kaufman@ECT
	Sent by: Lysa Akin@ECT
	11/10/2000 05:59 PM

		 To: Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron,
Susan J Mara/NA/Enron, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron,
Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron
		 cc: Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT, Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron, Marcia A
Linton/NA/Enron, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron, Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron
		 Subject: Meeting to discuss FERC Meeting held 9 Nov.

Paul Kaufman has asked me to set a conference call to review the FERC Meeting
that was held Thursday, Nov. 9th.

Please be advised that I have set the call as follows:

Date:  Monday, Nov. 13th
Time:  11:30am / 1:30pm Central / 2:30pm Eastern
Call In #: 888-422-7132
Pin #:  411507

Pin # for Paul Kaufman ONLY: 362416

If you have any questions, please call 503/464-7927.

Lysa Akin
Ass't. to Paul Kaufman


Thanks.  You're the best.

Robin


Attached is a draft for your review.  Please review and lets discuss any
comments.

  After re-reading the purchase and gathering agreement, I think the
amendments should work in their present form.  The 2,500 Western gas needs to
be noted as an exception on Exhibits A of both Agreements.   Exception should
read "Up to the first 2,500 mmbtu/day of production from the Caballo Area
shall be delivered to Western.... with ENA  (or EMS as applicable for the
agreement) receiving all volumes in excess of such 2,500 mmbtu/day.  Any
decline in the Caballo Area production shall apply ratably between Western's
2,500 mmbtu/day and ENA's (or EMS as applicable for the agreement) production
levels."

I got my mind on my money and my money on my mind.


check this out and let everyone know what's up.
---------------------- Forwarded by Tim Belden/HOU/ECT on 08/20/2000 09:16 PM
---------------------------
From: Richard Ingersoll on 08/17/2000 01:11 PM CDT
To: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim Heizenrader/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: Path 26 OTC increase -- study report and conference call info

I haeeery reason to believe that this uprating of path 26 from  2800 to 3000
will get approved for the balance of the summer.
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Ingersoll/HOU/ECT on 08/17/2000
01:09 PM ---------------------------

Eddy Lim <ELim@smud.org>@wscc.com on 08/16/2000 04:41:52 PM
Sent by: Maiser@wscc.com
To: "Operating Transfer Capability Policy Group" <otc@wscc.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: Path 26 OTC increase -- study report and conference call info

 <<OTC-Path 26-2000Summer Report update.doc>>

Dear CA OSS and WSCC OTCPG members,

 Attached is the Path 26 study report which supports moving the
thermally limited OTC from 2800 MW to 3000 MW.  The COI/PDCI and SCIT
nomogram remain unchanged. The CAISO has scheduled a conference call this
Friday to discuss this report and seek OSS and WSCC OTC PG review and
approval.  I know this is short notice for most of you.  In the interest are
reliability and full utilization of the system,  I thank you all in advance
for supporting the expedited review of this report.

If you have any questions or comments on the report please E-Mail  Chuck Wu
at Cywu@caiso.com <mailto:Cywu@caiso.com>  and CC me at Elim@smud.org
<mailto:Elim@smud.org> .

SEC at WSCC please post and distribute accordingly.

Talk to you this Friday!

Eddy Lim
SMUD
System Operations and Reliability
(916) 732-5362

 Conference Access
 ------------------------------------------
 US/Canada Dial-In Number:  (877) 381-5996
 Passcode (Owner ID):  784377
 ------------------------------------------
 Company Name:  California ISO
 Leader's Name:  Chuck Wu
 Conference Date:  8/18/2000
 Start Time:  10:00 am Pacific Time

 - OTC-Path 26-2000Summer Report update.doc


Start Date: 4/23/01; HourAhead hour: 15;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042315.txt


You're booked in Mt. Bachelor from 9:30 to 11 a.m. on Tuesday. I'll swing by
Starbucks in the morning and pick up a variety of bagels and cream cheese for
six people. We'll get a pot of coffee in there and you should be set. Let me
know if there's anything else I can do.

Kate


Steve,

As you are well aware, we are facing a lot of things happening fast in India.
We are using several parts of your team, and are very pleased with most. I
want to mention a couple of areas, HR and Security.

1. HR: I heard that some folks in Houston had raised concerns about the
quality of the India HR team and their preparedness. The HR team is doing an
outstanding job and I wanted you to hear that from me. Once we realized we
had a major issue on our hand, and I received clearance from Rebecca and Jim
to bring some HR folks into the loop, HR had someone on a plane within 20
hours of my first call. We have always had great HR support through Drew
Lynch and Bob Sparger, helping our team led by Sandip Malik, and this time
Scott Gilchrist has joined in and helped as well. But the two workhorses have
been Bob and Sandip. Bob got on a plane immediately and came over, and he and
Sandip have been working around the clock so that we are much better prepared
now than we were just a couple of days back. We really relied heavily on HR,
and Drew had his team there for us.

2. PR: top notch team of John Ambler and Johan Zaayman, working with and
supporting Jimmy Mogal on the ground. Johan and Jimmy have been a strong team
on the ground, and John has provided leadership and all coordination with
Houston. Great efforts and productive work.

3. Security: This area has not worked as well, and if you ever want feedback
on our one-time experience with this group, I will provide it. I don't have
any idea who is in charge from Enron's perspective here. There are 2 groups
headed this way. Mike Hicks will arrive Thursday night, and Mike has informed
us that he will be leading all security efforts. Jim Rountree is apparently
travelling with Mike, and Don Hawkins sent me an e-mail earlier today telling
me that Don has instructed Jim that Jim is in charge of coordinating our
security. John Brindle has sent me an e-mail saying that you have asked him
to coordinate and help in the ongoing efforts, and John is sending 3 people
over arriving Saturday night. First, we are very happy to have the help, but
I just hope that Mike, Jim and John know which of the three are in charge. If
you could just let me know who you want to be in charge, we will coordinate
with that person.

On a side note, the people who have really been helpful were brought in
through Drew Lynch of Europe HR. They are Jim Roth and Dave Lawler, both of
whom work for John Sherriff. They had a great attitude, were willing to work
day and night and were planning on coming to coordinate until Mike decided he
would come.

At Mike's earlier suggestion, we engaged Hill & Associates to help on
security. Because I was having to meet with them 3 to 4 times per day, I
asked Jane Wilson to help coordinate all our security efforts. Jane has done
a fantastic job in an impossibly short time frame. The tasks she has been
overseeing include coordinating with Hill & Associates, removing (in a lowkey
yet rush manner) over 400 boxes of files and documents and getting them
through customs and to Europe, removing 2 container truck loads of files from
the Dabhol site and getting them out of the country, and overseeing a
complete security check and file removal of all our electronic files from
servers, desktops and laptops. In addition, she has coordinated security for
all expats and families as well as worked with EOGIL expats and Anthony
Duenner of EBS Asia.

Again, we appreciate all the help.

Wade


I have recently come on board as Treasurer ,Enron India . Prior to joining ,
I was with Reliance Industries , a petrochemical conglomerate in India.
   The  Central banking authorities are now thinking of permitting
corporates  to hedge their oil and other related risks. I believe the
literature published
 by Risk in collaboration with Enron has come to be considered as an
industry standard. Would it be possible to arrange for two copies to be sent
across to us .

Thanx N Regards

G.Subramaniam
Treasurer,
Enron India Pvt. Ltd.
36 ,Maker Chambers VI,
Nariman Point,
Mumbai 400 021


- 11_20_01ON.xls


have we reponded?
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 12/19/2000 10:59 AM -----

	Richard Shapiro
	12/15/2000 05:51 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda
Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Bush/Cheney Transition: Electricity

---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 12/15/2000
05:51 PM ---------------------------

Jkellihers@aol.com on 12/15/2000 05:48:31 PM
To: <rshapiro@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Bush/Cheney Transition: Electricity

Rich, I am on a leave from LeBoeuf and working on the Transition Team as part
of the Energy Policy Group for the next few weeks.  We request Enron's views
on electricity issues.  I regret the short notice and tight deadline for your
response (Monday COB), but time is short and there is a need to flesh out
Administration positions and prepare nominees.  Please consider responding to
the questions as an attachment to your response, which should use the
requested template.  Until we move in the D.C. Transition office on Monday or
so, the best way to reach me is cell phone (202-255-6803) or email.
Regards.


Vince:

We will have cocktails with Andrew at Mi Luna in the Village (on
University, south side of the street between Kirby and Morningside) at 5:30
Monday evening.  You can join in there or meet up with the dinner crew at
the appointed place.

We'll see you Monday.

bbo


No longer require access thanks

P.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Johnson, Sonya
Sent:	Monday, May 14, 2001 5:08 PM
To:	DL-DJI
Subject:	"Do you use Dow Jones Interactive?"

Enron is in the process of re-negotiating our contract with Dow Jones Interactive and we need to know if you are currently
accessing this data.  In the near future there will be a cost associated with this information and you are currently listed as
having a license.

Please click on the below link and let us know if you need continued access to this service.

http://nahou-webcl1.corp.enron.com/inquisite/DJI/DJI.html

Thank You,
Market Data

Sonya L. Johnson
Enron Networks
Market Data Analyst/IT
(713) 345-4540
sonya.johnson@enron.com


Attached below please find the cash flow/tariff increase study we discussed 2
1/2 weeks ago at the Sunday DPC strategy session.  The study assumes a
decrease in losses from 40% to 25% and an increase in collection efficiency
83% to 92% from 2000-01 to 2006-07.  Further, it is assumed that only one
block of DPC operates until 2006-07.

Two scenarios based on average realisation are illustrated:

1. A realistic cash flow study and  accompanying tariffs.  Given the above
assumptions and assuming there is no state subsidy in 2006-07, MSEB should
have a cash flow deficit of R34 Cr. in 2006-07 when Phase II comes on line
for sale to MSEB, given a reasonable annual tariff increase.  (See the tariff
sheet in gray shaded area.)  The annual rate increases would be15% for LT and
HT agriculture and LT public water works, a 10% increase for domestic, street
lights and interstate sales, a 4% increase for LT industrial and powerloom,
and 1% increase for LT commercial and HT industrial, public water works and
railways.

2. The annual tariff increases needed for MSEB to break even with a 3%
profit, assuming industrial and commercial classes are held flat, are
detailed below.  (See the Tariff sheet in red.)

 Domestic          8%
 LT Public Water Works    35.60%
 LT Agriculture and Poultry   26%
 Street Light     10.8%
 HT Agricultural & Poultry    26.9%
 Mula Pravara Electric Coop Soc.  24.30%
 Interstate sales       6.5%

It is obvious that  even the more realistic scenario would require strong
MSEB, state government and regulator resolve.

In a separate e:mail I will describe the cost of service study we have also
developed for MSEB.
---------------------- Forwarded by Jane Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
02/06/2001 11:08 AM ---------------------------

Heidi Hellmann

02/06/2001 09:43 PM

To: Jane Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Ban Sharma/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Latest Model/Summary

Jane,

Attached is the latest summary (hard coded numbers, like I sent before) and
the latest cashflow model in case that is required for anything.

Just to confirm all that has changed are the customer categories and the MU's
in 1999-2000.


---------------------- Forwarded by Jennifer Nguyen/Corp/Enron on 12/22/99
01:13 PM ---------------------------

Larry Lenning <larry@apbenergy.com> on 12/22/99 12:04:06 PM
To: Jennifer Nguyen/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: FW: Interesting Billboards

----------
From:  Aiysha Billings
Sent:  Wednesday, December 22, 1999 12:29 PM
To:  Amber Walker; Amy McClure; Andy Weingarten; Angela Lane; Aubrey
Lipscomb; Beth Hinkebein; Bill Fuller; Bill Kerr; Bo Popovic; Bob Olver;
Brad Florer; Brad Hellman; Brian Hovekamp; Bridget Byrne; Chad Heilig;
Charles Hopmann; Chris Bohnert; Chris Brown; Chris Donohue; Chris Edmonds;
Chris Waits; Chris Williams; Chuck Tanner; Craig Waits; Curtis Edmonds;
Dale Welch; Dan Wolf; David Kern; David Neal; Dennis Crum; Ed Pierangelino;
Elliot Sorkin; Erin Glassford; Erin Higgins; Erin Massey; Felicia Harper;
Frank Frigo; Goddard Hampton; Greg Crum; Greg Holtgrave; Henry Gordinier;
Inna Gurevich; Jack Lamon; James Mueller; Jay Gorman; Jeff Greenwood; Jeff
Knott; Jennifer Jenkins; Jody Clark; Joe Hale; John Davis; John Karlen;
John Perdew; Jonathan Lindsey; Julie Hawley; Justin Horn; Kathy Arnold; Ken
Donaldson; Kevin Gambill; Kim Bush; Kristin Dornbush; Kyle Galloway; Lance
Hickox; Lance McGarvey; Larry Lenning; Leeann Wood; Loren Miller; Mark
Brizendine; Martin McKinney; Matthew Keck; Melissa Davis; Michael
Gustafson; Michelle Green; Mickey Tarullo; Mike Kamber; Mike Lewis; Missy
Colvin; Paul Barr; Paul Lutz; Paul Zinner; Peggy Hickey; Peter Hawkins;
Phil Evans; Preston Higgins; Richard Johnson; Rob Duncan; Rodger McAlister;
Russell Kennedy; Ryan Mitcham; Scott Karr; Scott Tanner; Scott Thompson;
Sean O'Leary; Shannon Hellman; Shawn Ridge; Steve Hulsman; Tarreck Yennes;
Teresa Hwang; Tim Osting; Tim Peters; Tim Ratliff; Tod Vaught; Todd Creek;
Todd Mercer; Tony Christensen; Tony Tong; Travis Powers; Trevor Atkins;
Will Vaughn; Xiujing Zhang
Subject:  FW: Interesting Billboards

----------
From:  Tracy Reecer[SMTP:TracyR@thorntonoil.com]
Sent:  Wednesday, December 22, 1999 9:17 AM
To:  Julie Kurtz; Lisa Daniszewski; 'mdpower@powercreative.com';
'maepaine@ntr.net'; 'aiysha@apbenergy.com';
'Crystal.Settles@mail.state.ky.us'
Subject:  FW: Interesting Billboards

-----Original Message-----
From: Clem Melissa [mailto:Melissa.Clem@Columbia.net]
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 1999 8:55 AM
To: 'tracyr@thorntonoil.com'; 'boonect@mcsmotion.com';
'jdub3144@cs.com'; 'lvl1kac@air.ups.com'; Payne Becky; Huffman Patty;
Garlic Tracy; Hassman, Tara; Schell Tressa; Kitten Jason; Miller Greg
Subject: Interesting Billboards

 > <<BILLBOAR.JPG>>  <<BILLJPG_.JPG>>
  <<RIGHTS.JPG>>  <<LIQUID.JPG>>  <<GOD.JPG>>  <<FLIP.JPG>>
<<BILLBOAR.JPG>>  <<BILLJPG_.JPG>>

 - ATT00000.html
 - RIGHTS.JPG
 - LIQUID.JPG
 - GOD.JPG
 - FLIP.JPG
 - BILLBOAR.JPG
 - BILLJPG_.JPG


---------------------- Forwarded by Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT on 12/16/99 12:58
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Rodney Malcolm                           12/16/99 12:45 PM

To: Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Summer - Winter Designation

Designation for Gas Index switch over
April through October - Summer
Nov through March - Winter or non summer


Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-Path: <danryan@netwalk.com>
Received: from  rly-yd02.mx.aol.com (rly-yd02.mail.aol.com [172.18.150.2]) by
air-yd01.mail.aol.com (v76_r1.8) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Oct 2000 12:44:08 -0400
Received: from  mail.siscom.net (mail.siscom.net [209.251.2.99]) by
rly-yd02.mx.aol.com (v75_b3.9) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Oct 2000 12:43:41 -0400
Received: (qmail 19298 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2000 16:43:37 -0000
Received: from ppp17.pm1.col-oh.siscom.net (HELO SALES1) (209.251.1.37)  by
mail.siscom.net with SMTP; 9 Oct 2000 16:43:37 -0000
Reply-To: <danryan@netwalk.com>
From: "Dan Ryan" <danryan@netwalk.com>
To: "Jeffery Lowney" <jefflowney@aol.com>
Subject: Enron Counter Party
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 12:43:00 -0400
Message-ID: <MJELLCMCBMCLEEJPCGMBGEHMCBAA.danryan@netwalk.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700
Importance: Normal

Jeff:  When Jason Peters and I concluded negotiations of the Enron Provider
Agreement and the General Terms and Conditions (GTC), we had sent him the
Release of the new "Counter Party Management" System we coded and went live
on the site with to meet Enron's requirements.  He took several days in
having his people check it out operationally and he approved it.  We were
prepared with the following language to include at the end of Section 5 of
the GTC but was not asked for it so he never saw it.  You can use the
following at the end of Section 5 if Enron wants, but the System is
operational and in place as they requested.

"EnergyGateway will implement and maintain systems which allow User to
determine whether other users of the System are approved counter parties for
User to trade with.  User may modify its list of approved counter parties at
anytime".

Good luck in finalizing the GTC with Enron.  Please call me if I can help in
any way.
Thanks, Dan...

Dan Ryan, President
EnergyGateway.com
614-899-2900 x102 Office
614-899-2922 Fax
614-679-4402 Cell


"If everybody is thinking alike, then somebody isn,t thinking.8  - George S.
Patton, Jr.

Keeping with our Mind,s Eye Madness week, be sure to check out the Enron Mind,
s Eye Motorcade
on Friday, April 27th from 11:30am to 1:00pm at the Big E Cafe.  This art car
convoy will spend the day visiting
Enron-designated stops in the community to promote innovation and
creativity.  Mirroring Enron,s innovation,
these artists think about the way things could be and are not limited by the
way things are.

Featuring:
Lunch by Escalantes Mexican Grille - choice of beef, chicken or veggie
fajitas with trimmings, dessert and a drink for $5.
Live salsa music will be provided by Tropicrew, featuring Enron,s own Ms.
Alex Villarreal as the lead singer.
Non-profit organizations represented will include the March of Dimes, SEARCH
and the Lupus Foundation of America.
Get lunch free if you're dressed "freaky"!

Word of the Day
Zeitgeist \TSYT-guyst; ZYT-guyst\, noun:  The spirit of the time; the general
intellectual & moral state or temper characteristic of any period of time.


Attached are two of TradersNews Energy's three new hourly indexes, for  the
ComEd and TVA hubs. We will send you these new hourly indexes at no charge
until March 19, when we formally launch them on our Web site, at
www.tradersnewsenergy.com.
?
If you'd like to receive our ERCOT hourly index or have questions or
feedback about that region, e-mail Suzanna Strangmeier, at
suzanna.strangmeier@ipgdirect.com.
?
Otherwise, please contact me with any feedback or  questions. Thank you.
?
Bobette  Riner???????????????????????????????
Director of Indexes
TradersNews Energy
713/647-8690
FAX:  713/647-7552
cell: 832/428-7008
bobette.riner@ipgdirect.com
http://www.tradersnewsenergy.com
?
?
 - comedhrly030601.doc
 - tvahrly030601.doc


Please submit any changes or questions about the hotlist by the end of the day today.

Thanks

Trey Hardy


Nice message, you're mental.


Tana/Kelly/Karen:

The product long description below will fall under the new product type US
Weather BP BDD Swap.  Credit (Tom Moran) has approved copying the profiles
for the new product type from the following:

 US Weather CDD Swap

Please respond no later than 11 a.m. on Wednesday, April 18.

Thank you.

----- Forwarded by Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT on 04/17/01 10:31 PM -----

	Kevin Meredith@ENRON
	04/09/01 03:59 PM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/Enron@EnronXGate, Jeff
Blumenthal/Enron@EnronXGate, Susan Musch/Enron@EnronXGate, Bjorn
Hagelmann/Enron@EnronXGate, Matthew F Gockerman/Enron@EnronXGate, Larry Joe
Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelly Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron,
Tara Sweitzer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dawn C Kenne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Torrey
Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert B Cass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandeep
Ramachandran/ENRON@enronXgate, Carl Carter/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Approval needed for US Weather Swap

Your review and approval of the following product type in the EOL Datamanager
is needed (for directions on approval , please see steps for approval at the
bottom of this e-mail). If you have any questions please call me at ext.
39555.
********* DO NOT APPROVE PRODUCT TYPES BETWEEN THE HOURS OF 6AM -
11AM***********

US Wthr BP BDD Swap    Bond Portfolio   [Nov00/Oct01]    USD/BDD

A US Weather Bond Portfolio Basket Degree Day Financial Swap Transaction with
Enron North America Corp., under which the Seller is obliged to pay the
Payment Amount to the Buyer where the Floating Amount is above the Strike
Amount, or where the Buyer is obliged to pay the Payment Amount to the Seller
where the Floating Amount is below the Strike Amount.  The Floating Amount is
the sum of the Underlying Payment Amounts for the Underlying Transactions.
The Strike Amount shall be the amount submitted in the "price" field by
Counterparty via the Website. The Notional Amount is the quantity submitted
by Counterparty via the Website. The Payment Amount is the product of (i) the
Notional Amount and (ii) the absolute value of the difference between the
Floating Amount and the Strike Amount.
The Calculation Period is from and including the Effective Date of November
1, 2000 to and including the Termination Date of October 31, 2001.
The Calculation Period shall commence at 12:01am on the Effective Date and
conclude at 12:00am on the Termination Date at the relevant Reference Weather
Station or Fallback Station for the Underlying Transactions.  The Basket of
Reference Weather Stations for the Underlying Transactions and the terms and
conditions for such Underlying Transactions as well as the respective
Fallback Stations are set forth in the GTC.
The price is quoted in US Dollars per unit of volume, which will be the
Contractual Currency.
BDD shall mean Basket Degree Day.
The Reference Basis shall be in Degrees Fahrenheit as specified for each
relevant Reverence Weather Station.

The Maximum Payout Limit is ____ USD, multiplied by the quantity submitted by
the Counterparty via the Website.

==============================================================================

STEPS FOR APPROVAL:

click the  START button
select  PROGRAMS
select  TEST APPLICATIONS
select ENRONONLINE CLUSTER(PROD)
 PROCEED WITH USUAL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click the Enron Online Production Cluster "START" button
select EnronOnLine (this is the EOL Datamanager)
 PROCEED WITH EOL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click on the "+" for EnronOnLine
click on the "+" for Product Types
click on the "+" for "Partially Approved"
select the product requiring review as stated in e-mail above
Right "mouse" click on "properties" to view product set-up

TO APPROVE:  Right mouse click on "Approved"


This request has been pending your approval for  6 days.  Please click
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000037746&Page=
Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000037746
Request Create Date : 5/30/01 11:37:32 AM
Requested For       : steve.hall@enron.com
Resource Name       : Unlisted Application/Software
Resource Type       : Applications