FYI

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Bernice Norris" <bernice@arenaenergy.com <mailto:bernice@arenaenergy.com>>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, October  9, 2001 10:23 AM
To:	Koehler, Anne C.
Subject:	Re: Confidentiality Agreement

Anne,

Thank you for reviewing the changes.  I was out of the office until today.
I don't think that term change will be a problem; however,  I will check
with our legal on all changes.  I should have a definative answer by the end
of the week.

As per your email, if the changes are acceptable, we will notify you and
should receive originals from Enron.

If you have any questions, please contact me at 281-681-9500 ext 4.

-Bernice Norris

----- Original Message -----
From: "Koehler, Anne C." <Anne.C.Koehler@ENRON.com <mailto:Anne.C.Koehler@ENRON.com>>
To: <bernice@arenaenergy.com <mailto:bernice@arenaenergy.com>>
Cc: "Lebrocq, Wendi" <Wendi.LeBrocq@ENRON.com <mailto:Wendi.LeBrocq@ENRON.com>>; "Jones, Tana"
<Tana.Jones@ENRON.com <mailto:Tana.Jones@ENRON.com>>
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 5:05 PM
Subject: RE: Confidentiality Agreement

Bernice,

I apologize for the delay in responding to your comments to our
Confidentiality agreement.  I have accepted most of your changes, with
the only substantive exception being the term.  We would like the term
to be one year from the date of disclosure.  If you would like to
discuss this further, please give me a call.  If this form is acceptable
to you, please let me know and we will have an execution copy forwarded
to you.

Thanks, Anne

 <<Credit Department Confidentiality Agmt arenarevision.doc>>

 -----Original Message-----
From: Lebrocq, Wendi
Sent: Friday, October  5, 2001 4:39 PM
To: Koehler, Anne C.; Jones, Tana
Subject: FW: Confidentiality Agreement

Regards,

Wendi LeBrocq
3-3835

-----Original Message-----
From: Lebrocq, Wendi
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 12:47 PM
To: Jones, Tana
Subject: FW: Confidentiality Agreement

Tana:
I forwarded the CA format to one of the EOL applicants on 8/9.  The
company has some requested changes to the format.  Would you please let
me know if the changes are acceptable.
Regards,

Wendi LeBrocq
3-3835

-----Original Message-----
From: Bernice Norris [mailto:bernice@arenaenergy.com] <mailto:[mailto:bernice@arenaenergy.com]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 9:34 AM
To: Lebrocq, Wendi
Subject: Re: Confidentiality Agreement

 << File: Credit Department Confidentiality Agmt arenarevision.doc >>
<<Credit Department Confidentiality Agmt arenarevision.doc>> Wendi,
Here are the revisions that Arena is requesting to your pro forma
Confidentiality Agreement.
Please let me know if these are agreeable.
Thanks,
Bernice Norris
281-681-9500 ext 4
281-681-9503 fax

----- Original Message -----
From: "Lebrocq, Wendi" <Wendi.LeBrocq@ENRON.com <mailto:Wendi.LeBrocq@ENRON.com>>
To: <bernice@arenaenergy.com <mailto:bernice@arenaenergy.com>>
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 1:10 PM
Subject: Confidentiality Agreement

Bernice:
As discussed, I am forwarding a draft of Enron's Confidentiality
Agreement.  If you are in agreement I can have this executed on my side
and then delivered to you for execution.  Please contact me at
713-853-3835 with any questions.
<<Credit Department Confidentiality Agmt (counterparty protected party
07-18-01).doc>>
Regards,
Wendi LeBrocq
3-3835

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
(or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender
or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com <mailto:enron.messaging.administration@enron.com> and
delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not
create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron
Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other
party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by
estoppel or otherwise.  Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Start Date: 4/4/01; HourAhead hour: 3;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001040403.txt
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: Crawler lifetime exceeded.
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database


To the attention of:
Dr Kenneth L. Lay
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
ENRON CORPORATION

Dear Dr Lay,

Further to our confirmation of your participation in Annual Meeting 2001, I
am most pleased to send you the enclosed information which provides you with
a first look at the concept of the programme as well as with practical
details on your stay in Davos.

Should you need any assistance with your registration, please do not hesitate
to get in touch with my colleague in charge of your sector at the Foundation.

With best personal regards,

Claude Smadja,
Managing Director
World Economic Forum

You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to open the attached document.
If it is not yet installed on your system, you can download it at:
http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep.html

 - September Update.pdf


You're welcome.


are you sure...have you ever been to bon coupe before
don't knock it till tou try it


Thanks to all of you who have commented already on earlier versions of the
attached white paper.  Remember, this is the message we want to use now as we
are telling various audiences our strategy for the regions.  Please edit on e
mail and send comments back to me by end of day London time Wednesday if
possible.  I am en route to Houston on Wednesday.

I am also recruiting Frank Sayre to help me with the Central America section,
which is weak.

Once I hear from you I'll revise again and send new draft by Thursday.  Who
should be on the next distribution list besides all of you?


Do you want to keep any of the old TRV files for Netco for any reason.  We can create new ones once it is set up.

KK


Tana has pointed out that Net Works does not have a policy (at least not one
we have heard of) regarding the handling of original contract documentation
after it is executed.  There is not an Enron-wide policy but instead a
patch-work of policies created by the operating units.  Tana and I would be
happy to discuss this with you - or whoever you want to designate - and make
suggestions if you don't already have a plan in mind.


Return-path: <VKaminski@aol.com>
From: VKaminski@aol.com
Full-name: VKaminski
Message-ID: <d3.d9d4461.2761c976@aol.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 00:19:50 EST
Subject: Fwd: EPRM Article
To: vkamins@enron.com
CC: VKaminski@aol.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="part2_1e.e608831.2761c976_boundary"
X-Mailer: Unknown sub 171

Return-Path: <chris@lacima.co.uk>
Received: from  rly-xa05.mx.aol.com (rly-xa05.mail.aol.com [172.20.105.74])
by air-xa01.mail.aol.com (v77.14) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Dec 2000 12:47:35 -0500
Received: from  mail01b.rapidsite.net (mail01b.rapidsite.net
[207.158.192.229]) by rly-xa05.mx.aol.com (v76_r1.19) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Dec
2000 12:47:00 -0500
Received: from www.lacima.co.uk (209.41.1.121) by mail01b.rapidsite.net (RS
ver 1.0.58s) with SMTP id 0923182 for <VKaminski@aol.com>; Tue,  5 Dec 2000
12:46:46 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <000001c05ee3$91887440$fd8301ca@eu.entergy.com>
Reply-To: "Chris Strickland" <chris@lacima.co.uk>
From: "Chris Strickland" <chris@lacima.co.uk>
To: <VKaminski@aol.com>
References: <6c.2cfb0c2.26e92926@aol.com>
Subject: EPRM Article
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 04:16:05 +1100
Organization: Lacima Consultants
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0097_01C05F3B.405E3980"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
X-Loop-Detect: 1

Hi Vince,

Hope things are fine with you. I'm sorry that I only ever write to you when
I'm after something, but could you look at this simulation article - the
next installment in the EPRM articles.

Many thanks and best regards.

Chris.

----- Original Message -----
From: <VKaminski@aol.com>
To: <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>; <Les@lacima.co.uk>; <chris@lacima.co.uk>;
<robin@risk.co.uk>
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 4:23 AM
Subject: Re: VaR Article

> Les,
>
> The revised version  of the VaR article looks fine.
>
> Vince
>

 - EPRM_04_sim_mr.zip


You sent a confidential envelope to John on Monday, April 17, 2000.  John is
now working in the Houston Office.  He is temporarily in Boardroom EB 3320.
I wanted to know if it was all right to forwarding the envelope you sent to
him with tonight's courier package or can I forward this to someone else in
the Calgary office.  Rob Milnthorp is the new President and CEO of Enron
Canada and John McKay is the Trading Director.  Please let me know.

Angela


Thank you for subscribing to the Alaska Airlines and Horizon Air Web
Specials Announcement Service.

Web Specials are a great way to save on flights with Alaska Airlines and
Horizon Air. Web Specials can only be purchased online through the Alaska
Airlines/Horizon Air Web Site.

Alaska Airlines and Horizon Air offer Web Specials for travel originating
Wednesday, 01/24/01 or Thursday, 01/25/01 or Saturday, 01/27/01, and
returning Saturday, 01/27/01 or Monday, 01/29/01 or Tuesday, 01/30/01.

Hurry, seats are limited, prices and markets subject to change.

The current specials are shown below (all fares quoted in US dollars)
without airport fees and segment tax:

Roundtrip Coach fares for travel between:
Anchorage, AK               Port Angeles, WA        $369.00
Anchorage, AK               Burbank, CA             $379.00
Anchorage, AK               Barrow, AK              $399.00
Anchorage, AK               Sacramento, CA          $399.00
Anchorage, AK               Pullman/Moscow, WA      $399.00
Anchorage, AK               Tucson, AZ              $459.00
Barrow, AK                  Anchorage, AK           $399.00
Bethel, AK                  Seattle, WA             $499.00
Boise, ID                   Spokane, WA              $59.00
Boise, ID                   Lewiston/Clarkston, ID   $59.00
Boise, ID                   San Jose, CA             $99.00
Boise, ID                   Los Angeles, CA         $179.00
Boise, ID                   Juneau, AK              $249.00
Burbank, CA                 Portland, OR            $179.00
Burbank, CA                 Port Angeles, WA        $229.00
Burbank, CA                 Anchorage, AK           $379.00
Eugene/Springfield, OR      Los Angeles, CA         $109.00
Fairbanks, AK               Kodiak, AK              $149.00
Fairbanks, AK               Oakland, CA             $409.00
Fairbanks, AK               San Diego, CA           $419.00
Fresno, CA                  Seattle, WA             $149.00
Fresno, CA                  Ketchikan, AK           $379.00
Juneau, AK                  Boise, ID               $249.00
Juneau, AK                  Pullman/Moscow, WA      $289.00
Juneau, AK                  Oakland, CA             $299.00
Juneau, AK                  Ontario, CA             $319.00
Ketchikan, AK               Sitka, AK               $119.00
Ketchikan, AK               Port Angeles, WA        $299.00
Ketchikan, AK               Fresno, CA              $379.00
Ketchikan, AK               Tucson, AZ              $399.00
Kodiak, AK                  Fairbanks, AK           $149.00
Las Vegas, NV               Pullman/Moscow, WA      $219.00
Lewiston/Clarkston, ID      Boise, ID                $59.00
Los Angeles, CA              Eugene/Springfield, OR  $109.00
Los Angeles, CA             Boise, ID               $179.00
Los Angeles, CA              Seattle, WA             $189.00
Los Angeles, CA              Redmond, OR             $289.00
Los Angeles, CA              Sitka, AK               $379.00
Oakland, CA                 Port Angeles, WA        $189.00
Oakland, CA                 Juneau, AK              $299.00
Oakland, CA                 Fairbanks, AK           $409.00
Ontario, CA                 Redmond, OR             $229.00
Ontario, CA                 Juneau, AK              $319.00
Orange County, CA           Pullman/Moscow, WA      $259.00
Palm Springs, CA            Vancouver, BC           $269.00
Pendleton, OR               Portland, OR             $59.00
Petersburg, AK              Seattle, WA             $269.00
Phoenix, AZ                 Seattle, WA             $189.00
Phoenix, AZ                 Vancouver, BC           $199.00
Port Angeles, WA            Seattle, WA              $59.00
Port Angeles, WA            Reno/Tahoe, NV          $179.00
Port Angeles, WA            Oakland, CA             $189.00
Port Angeles, WA            Burbank, CA             $229.00
Port Angeles, WA            San Diego, CA           $239.00
Port Angeles, WA            Ketchikan, AK           $299.00
Port Angeles, WA            Anchorage, AK           $369.00
Portland, OR                Pendleton, OR            $59.00
Portland, OR                Vancouver, BC            $73.00
Portland, OR                San Francisco, CA       $109.00
Portland, OR                Burbank, CA             $179.00
Pullman/Moscow, WA          Seattle, WA              $79.00
Pullman/Moscow, WA          Reno/Tahoe, NV          $199.00
Pullman/Moscow, WA          Las Vegas, NV           $219.00
Pullman/Moscow, WA          Orange County, CA       $259.00
Pullman/Moscow, WA          Tucson, AZ              $279.00
Pullman/Moscow, WA          Juneau, AK              $289.00
Pullman/Moscow, WA          Anchorage, AK           $399.00
Redmond, OR                 Seattle, WA              $79.00
Redmond, OR                 San Jose, CA            $159.00
Redmond, OR                 San Francisco, CA       $179.00
Redmond, OR                 Ontario, CA             $229.00
Redmond, OR                 Los Angeles, CA         $289.00
Reno/Tahoe, NV              Port Angeles, WA        $179.00
Reno/Tahoe, NV              Pullman/Moscow, WA      $199.00
Sacramento, CA              Anchorage, AK           $399.00
San Diego, CA               Port Angeles, WA        $239.00
San Diego, CA               Fairbanks, AK           $419.00
San Francisco, CA           Portland, OR            $109.00
San Francisco, CA           Seattle, WA             $119.00
San Francisco, CA           Redmond, OR             $179.00
San Jose, CA                Boise, ID                $99.00
San Jose, CA                Redmond, OR             $159.00
Seattle, WA                 Port Angeles, WA         $59.00
Seattle, WA                 Pullman/Moscow, WA       $79.00
Seattle, WA                 Redmond, OR              $79.00
Seattle, WA                 San Francisco, CA       $119.00
Seattle, WA                 Fresno, CA              $149.00
Seattle, WA                 Los Angeles, CA         $189.00
Seattle, WA                 Phoenix, AZ             $189.00
Seattle, WA                 Wrangell, AK            $269.00
Seattle, WA                 Petersburg, AK          $269.00
Seattle, WA                 Yakutat, AK             $299.00
Seattle, WA                 Bethel, AK              $499.00
Sitka, AK                   Ketchikan, AK           $119.00
Sitka, AK                   Los Angeles, CA         $379.00
Spokane, WA                 Boise, ID                $59.00
Tucson, AZ                  Pullman/Moscow, WA      $279.00
Tucson, AZ                  Ketchikan, AK           $399.00
Tucson, AZ                  Anchorage, AK           $459.00
Vancouver, BC               Portland, OR             $73.00
Vancouver, BC               Phoenix, AZ             $199.00
Vancouver, BC               Palm Springs, CA        $269.00
Wrangell, AK                Seattle, WA             $269.00
Yakutat, AK                 Seattle, WA             $299.00

Additional markets are available at:
http://shopping.alaskaair.com/webspecials/start.asp. Check the Alaska Web
Specials page periodically as additional markets and dates may be added.

Web Special details:
Valid on Alaska Airlines or Horizon Air only.
Seats are limited and may not be available on all flights/dates.
Fares quoted do not include the following government imposed taxes and
fees charged on a per-person basis: Airport Passenger Facility Charges of
up to $18 (amount depends on itinerary), segment fees of $2.75 per flight
segment (takeoff and landing on your itinerary) or international departure
taxes.
Fares to/from Mexico do not include the Mexico Tourist tax of $18
(fluctuates with Dollar-Peso exchange rate) or international departure
taxes of approximately $50.
Fares to/from Canada do not include U.S. Customs and Immigration fee of $6
or Vancouver airport improvement fee.
Offer is for a very limited time and is subject to change without notice.
Valid on new bookings only.
Reservations must be made using the Alaska Airlines Web Site. Tickets
require immediate purchase by credit card when reservations are made.
Ticketing will be electronic, using Instant Ticket services.
Tickets are non-refundable, non-changeable and are of no value after the
last date of your planned travel.
Other restrictions apply.

For special value rates at Hilton Hotels in Alaska Airlines cities visit
the Hilton Web site at:
http://www.hilton.com/specials/values/akairvalues.html

You are receiving this message today because you subscribed to our Email
Notification Service.

While we,d be pleased to continue to tell you about our great products and
prices, you can unsubscribe to our Email Notification Service by visiting
our Web site at: http://www2.alaskaair.com/listserv/webmail.asp

Please do not respond to this message. Mail sent to this address cannot be
answered.


Please, remove me from the distribution list.

vkamins@enron.com


I think it sounds worthwhile -- since Linda Breathitt and Stacy Girard are participating.  If Stan is unavailable, I think Phil Lowry or Mike Nelson would also be great choices.
-----Original Message-----
From: Taylor, Gina
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 10:28 AM
To: Corman, Shelley; Hartsoe, Joe
Subject: FW: CTN Special November 1 Broadcast

Stan's been invited to present at a broadcast that SGA is hosting.  Apparently, Jerry Halverson indicated to this organization that Stan would be a great person to represent the industry.  Would you both take a look at the agenda for the broadcast and let me know if you think this is something that Stan should participate in?

If it is something that you think is worthwhile, I would work with INGAA on exactly what message they want Stan to communicate.

Thanks for your insight.

Can I get your opinion by Thursday?

Gina

-----Original Message-----
From: Nadine Fred [mailto:nfred@southerngas.org]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 10:05 AM
To: Taylor, Gina
Subject: CTN Special November 1 Broadcast

Gina,
Attached are two informational pieces regarding the November 1 Broadcast as
well as a registration form.  Hope you can join us.
Nadine


Bank One Line is closing today, with give up agreement to be finalized early
next week.  If there is any particular "file" processing for credit lines
applicable to this group, please advise.  Otherwise, I will have file with
originals set up and provided to Kay Young for central file room.

ABN further comments are due Monday and phone conference indicates very few
issues.  Should close next week.

By copy to Jeff, please provide tax comments on ABN on Monday.  Thank you.
Mary


As you may be aware, Enron Corp. is a member of the Official Unsecured
Creditors' Committee appointed in the Pacific Gas and Electric Company
bankruptcy case. Michael Tribolet with the Risk Assessment and Control Group
is Enron's designated representative on the committee and he is being
assisted by Lisa Mellencamp in the Enron North America Corp. legal group.
Please be advised that they will be restricted from disclosing certain of the
information that they receive.

Attached are Ethical Wall Procedures regarding confidential information that
Enron may receive as a member of the committee. It is important that you read
the procedures promptly, print the Employee Certification attached and sign
and return the Employee Certification to the Compliance Department as
directed.


Dear Power Outage Database Customer,

Attached you will find an excel document. The outage contained within is
a
rescheduled outage. Your daily delivery will still contain this
outage.

In addition to the excel document, there is a dbf file that is formatted
like your daily delivery you receive nightly. This will enable you to
load the data into your regular database. Any questions please let me
know.
Thanks.

Greg Elliott
IIR, Inc.
713-783-5147 x 3481
outages@industrialinfo.com

THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL IS LEGALLY PRIVILEGED AND
CONFIDENTIAL
INFORMATION INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED
ABOVE.  YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR
COPY OF THIS E-MAIL TO UNAUTHORIZED ENTITIES IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF
YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL IN ERROR, PLEASE DELETE IT.

 - 101601R.xls
 - OUTAGE.dbf


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 09/12/2000 09:00 AM -----

	Tom Moran
	09/08/2000 05:18 PM

		 To: Camille Gerard/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jarrod Cyprow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle
Bruce/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Adnan Patel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul
Radous/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bradley Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey
Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL Credit Responses 09/05/00

The Clickpaper approvals for 9/8/00 are attached below.

Regards,
tm


No.  Thanks again!  DF

	From:  Jean McFarland                           03/31/2000 09:36 AM

To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Follow-up

Drew -- did you have any problems with your laptop last night?  JM


Can you please talk to Justin and help him understand the structure we are
planning to use.  I hope that we won't need a different structure.  Hopefully
we can keep Justin in the loop and manage the legal aspect from here.    Let
me know.
---------------------- Forwarded by Bob Shults/HOU/ECT on 11/03/2000 10:36 AM
---------------------------

Justin Boyd
11/02/2000 10:02 AM
To: Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Amita Gosalia/LON/ECT@ECT, Andy Zipper/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: Broker Client Process flow

Bob

Thanks.  It seems to me that:

the broker acts as principal and must itself be EOL pre-approved
the broker will seek to novate the trade to the specified counterparty (who
must be EOL pre-approved in relation to the underlying product)
on novation (if at all), the broker is released as principal and the
specified counterparty is substituted therefor
if no novation occurs, the broker is liable as principal and any cash-out
should be calculated on market-based principles

Justin

To: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Andy Zipper/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amita
Gosalia/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Broker Client Process flow

Justin please see my comments in red below.  You probably need to have a
conversation with Mark Taylor to flush out details of the broker customer
relationship.

Justin Boyd
11/01/2000 02:50 AM
To: Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Andy Zipper/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amita
Gosalia/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Broker Client Process flow

Bob,

Thanks for these.  My comments/questions were:

What is the rationale for requiring margin from the broker, given its role as
agent for the client?  What if the client refuses to accept/acknowledge the
trade - I assume the agent is nonetheless liable?  The margin will secure the
risk between treansaction and confirmation with the counterparty.  the broker
will pay liquidated damages if counterparty does not accept the trade.  (risk
is essentially 1-3 days)

I assume we will negotiate a fully-fledged agreement with each broker,
covering all the usual protections for Enron (indemnities/right of agent to
bind its principal/reps and warranties/duties & obligations of
agent/liability of agent/margin arrangements)  Yes.  Mark Taylor is drafting
the agreement.  the agreement will lay out the margin requirements,
liquidated damages, etc.  I am not sure that the broker is acting as a agent
for the customer as the customer may not even know that the broker is
transacting on EnronOnline.

I assume that the client will be an approved EOL counterparty with trading
access for the particular product Not neccesarily.  the customer must however
have a profile set up in enronOnline and must have a credit headroom in
EnronOnline.  We can potentially paper the transaction under normal OTC
process.

We will need to ensure that the client agrees to be bound by each trade
concluded through the agent, notwithstanding the intermediation of the agent
(it would seem to me that we should create special ETAs/PAs for this purpose
- e.g. each trade is effected by the "click" of the agent, not the client;
the ETA does not contemplate intermediation; the PA relates to the use of
passwords by a principal and not its agent)  Mark is also drafting a BTA
(broker transaction agreement.  Once again the broker is not acting as agent
rather they will release the rights and obligations under the transaction to
the counterparty.

The agent will, in its terms of business with the client, need to ensure that
it is authorised to bind the client with respect all trades, whether effected
online (including EOL) or offline  This is not the case today in OTC
transactions and will not neccessarily be the case with the EnronOnline
broker client.

The agent will need to meet the usual legal/regulatory/financial tests, as if
it were acting as principal - e.g. in the case of derivatives trades, the
agent must be regulated to carry on its business by the UK SFA [no doubt, the
CFTC swaps exemption test will also need to be met]  Lets discuss

The agent must also be a corporate or similar commercial enterprise The
broker must be financially able to meet margin requirements

Look forward to your response.

Thanks

Justin

To: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andy Zipper/Corp/Enron@Enron, Michael
Bridges/NA/Enron@ENRON, Teresa Smith/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Broker Client Process flow

We are currently in discussions with 3-4 brokers (including GFI in London) to
allow them to transact on behalf of their customers via EnronOnline.  Mark
Taylor suggested that I send you some information on the broker client
application and the process flow.  Attached please find the functional
specifications for the broker client and a draft process flow.  All documents
are work in progress.

We have been discussing this with Amita Gosalia (EnronOnline Product
Control), Debbie Nichols and Gail Hill in the London Office.

Please call me with any question at 713 853-0397.  I will continue to
coordinate my legal questions through Mark Taylor.


We have faxed these.  Hope they help.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tycholiz, Barry
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 7:40 AM
To:	Le Dain, Eric
Subject:	Liquids agreements

Eric, can you have someone fax to me a copy of the TCPL Cochrane shrink agreement and also the PC ( empress ) shrink agreement.  SPPC has asked me to help her figure out the deal she has and I need to refresh on paper issues. Don't know if there is a deal here or not?

Thanks, BT


Giants +6
Carolina +7 1/2
Cinci -4
Denver +1 1/2
Tease Pitt +9 under 48 1/2
Seattle Pickm
Phil +3
SF -2 1/2
Indi-jets over 44
Jack -14 1/2

All 250

I have the balance at work.


---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 09/20/2000
08:25 AM ---------------------------
To: Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Timothy Blanchard/HOU/EES@EES, Jeffrey C
Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth Shulklapper/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nick
Hiemstra/HOU/ECT@ECT, Luis Mena/NA/Enron@Enron, Amir Ahanchian/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Brian Hoskins/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications
cc:

Subject: GAME TONIGHT @ 7:00

We have a game tonight at 7:00.  Please try to make it to the field by 6:30.

-Eric


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 07/26/2000
10:49 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kristian J Lande                           07/25/2000 02:24 PM

To: Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jake Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank W
Vickers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elliot Mainzer/PDX/ECT@ECT, Michael McDonald/SF/ECT@ECT,
David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Laird Dyer/SF/ECT@ECT, Jim Buerkle/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jim
Gilbert/PDX/ECT@ECT, Terry W Donovan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff G
Slaughter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike
Swerzbin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matt Motley/PDX/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sean Crandall/PDX/ECT@ECT, Diana Scholtes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Alonso/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mark Fischer/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tim Heizenrader/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: New Generation Update 7/24/00


Are there any individuals in your group that might find this seminar
beneficial?
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 07/19/2000 08:17 AM -----

	Sylvia Hu@ENRON
	07/14/2000 03:20 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Westlaw Luncheon - Thursday, 7/27  at EB 47C2  12 - 1:30 PM

Tana:

Please feel free to extend the invitation to any Enron employees who may be
interested in the presentation.  1st come, 1st serve.

Thanks,
Sylvia

----- Forwarded by Sylvia Hu/Corp/Enron on 07/14/2000 03:17 PM -----

	Tana Jones@ECT
	07/13/2000 07:39 PM

		 To: Sylvia Hu/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Westlaw Luncheon - Thursday, 7/27  at EB 47C2  12 - 1:30 PM

Is this only available to the Legal Group?  There are a few people in Credit
and Global Contracts that might find this helpful.  Please add me to the
list.  Thanks!

	Sylvia Hu@ENRON
	07/13/2000 05:51 PM

		 To: Elizabeth Linnell/HOU/EES@EES, Stephanie McMurray/HOU/EES@EES
		 cc: (bcc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT)
		 Subject: Westlaw Luncheon - Thursday, 7/27  at EB 47C2  12 - 1:30 PM

Westlaw has a new product - Westnews out on market in competing with Lexis'
Company Dossier on Lexsi-Nexis Universe.   You will have an opportunity to
learn Westnews from Michael Springler, Westlaw Attorney.  The presentation on
Westnews will be held at Conference Room EB47C2 on Thursday, from 12:00 noon
- 1:30 PM.  Lunch will be provided by Westlaw.  Please R.S.V.P. to Sylvia Hu
( x36775) or (email) by noon, 7/26.

Uncover relationships between people and businesses by searching Westnews and
public records on Westlaw.

Resources available include:
Company Profiles / People Finder / Asset locator
Corporate and Limited Partnership Records
Bankruptcy filings / UCC filings / Lawsuit filings
and more than 6,000 news and business publications,
including The Wall Street Journal.

Sylvia Hu
Corporate and Law Information Services
x36775


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Espinoza, Veronica
Sent:	Wednesday, November 07, 2001 9:02 AM
To:	Anderson, Diane; Bailey, Derek; Baumbach, David; Bell, Jean; Boulanger, Patricia; Brown, Angela Y.; Cisneros, Celeste; Crawford, Sharon; Deming, Richard; Dickson, Melia; Giron, Darron C.; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; Hoang, Charlie; Hunter, Larry Joe; Keiser, Kam; Love, Phillip M.; McLaughlin Jr., Errol; Mendoza, Nidia; Moran, Tom; Moscoso, Mirna; Mulvany, Patrick; Negrete, Flavia; Ornelas, Bianca; Osire, Ann; Otto, Randy; Pernul, Sarah; Reeves, Leslie; Rohauer, Tanya; Seib, Dianne; Sietzema, Linda; Theriot, Kim S.; Wallumrod, Ellen; Wilder, Wesley
Subject:	Credit Report--11/7/01


Please read below about the Mid-Year 2000 records that will be deleted on
11/17/00.
Thanks, hgm

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Gina Corteselli @ ENRON                           10/24/2000 04:04 PM

To: Ray Bennett/HOU/EES@EES, Dave Schafer/OTS/Enron@ENRON, David
Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary P Smith/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Drew C Lynch/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Janie Bonnard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robert
Jones/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sarah A Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Miguel
Padron/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Scott
Gilchrist/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ranendra
Sengupta/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Gerry Chatham/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Kimberly Rizzi/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Schaffer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bob
Sparger/Corp/Enron@Enron, Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marla Barnard/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Willie
Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mary Joyce/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Cindy Skinner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea Yowman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Laura
Schwartz/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sharon Butcher/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kriste
Sullivan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Brad Coleman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ryan
Seleznov/Corp/Enron@Enron, Suzanne Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth
Tilney/HOU/EES@EES, Teresa Bosien/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gina
Corteselli/Corp/Enron@Enron, Nigel Sellens/LON/ECT@ECT, Ann
Vaughn/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Elyse Kalmans/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sheila
Knudsen/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sheila Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gerry
Gibson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: MID YEAR 2000 Feedback will be deleted on 17 November

All;

As I mentioned this morning at Cindy's HR Leadership meeting, we plan to
delete the mid-year 2000 feedback from our system on 17 November 2000.  Would
you kindly communicate this to your clients, to ensure that any outstanding
final evaluations for mid-year 2000 are completed before that date.

Supervisors who may need to obtain consolidated feedback on their employees
or  to obtain final evaluation forms may call the Houston PEP Help Desk on
(713) 853-4777 (option 4) or via e-mail to PEP Help Desk employee Vincent
Cassata  (vincent.cassata@enron.com).

If you have any questions or concerns, please don't hesitate to contact me on
x53377.  Thanks,

Gina


Cheryl Nelson will be late this morning, and can be expected to be in around
11 - noon.  She is not feeling well, but expects to feel well enough to come
to work today.  If you should need assistance, don't hesitate to call.  Thank
you for your attention to this matter.  Regards, Keegan (5-3317)


Will do.

	Steven J Kean
	05/11/2001 08:35 AM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/Enron@EnronXGate, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject:

Ken Lay spoke with several California CEOs this morning and urged them to get
personally involved in pushing for a comprehensive set of reforms.  Three
expressed willingness to help.

Scott McNealy (Sun):  contact person - Piper Cole (piper.cole@sun.com);
scott.mcnealy@engeng.sun.com.  Mcnealy wants, by close of business today, a
"cheat sheet" of the talking points to use with politicians (the "8 or 10
elements of the solution") with the expected comeback he may hear from the
political leaders and our response to that comeback.  He says he hasn't spent
time working on issues in Sacremento so we may also want to include a list of
suggested contacts.
Kevin Sharer (Amgen): contact person - Sarah Jensen, VP of Engineering and
Operations (805.447.6785); ksharer@amgen.com.  Sharer wants the same
information as McNealy and he and McNealy both indicated their willingness to
call a meeting of other California CEOs.  Sharer will also be having
breakfast with Hertzberg one week from today.
Robert Day (Trust Co of the West):  said that he is very close to the mayor
of Los Angeles.  He urged Ken to call the mayor (mentioning Day).  Ken would
like some talking points for that call.

Jeff - please put these items together.


PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE

Richard,

 After today's discussion here are our brainstorming ideas on
options:

1.   WAIT FOR A BETTER PROTECTIVE ORDER
 Ask Harvey Morris where they are on fixing the protective order that
is being litigated by others.  If the protective order has not  changed,
then unilaterally postpone production until it is.  Pro: Better protection
and more time; Con: Even with a more stringent
 protective order Enron still questions whether the PUC is entitled
to financial performance data.  Thus, this option does not fully
disclose all of Enron's positions and the company may be accused later of
simply engaging in delaying tactics.  Under this option  we file our
formal objections as well.

2. TURN OVER THE TRANSACTION DATA AS IS
 Continue on our present course of turning over transaction data for
electricity that was delivered.  Pro: PUC will get the data  anyway
either through FERC, unfair competition, antitrust or price gouging
litigation.  By turning over the data that will show  profits, PUC might
slow down investigation there as opposed to interrupting the business by
seeking to depose witnesses etc.  Con:  This would be waiving the
legitimate question that Enron has as to the PUC's ability to discovery this
information through a  subpoena.  There is also a question of how
confidential this data would be given the current political agenda.  It
might also serve  to whet the appetite of the PUC for more Enron
information and discovery.   This option would also provide confidential
proprietary information to the PUC about how Enron gets its competitive
advantage.

3. TURN OVER DATA FOR OUTSIDE OF CALIFORNIA AND LET PUC GET REST OF
DATA FROM ISO AND PX.
 We have told the PUC we do not want to duplicate the efforts of ISO
and PX so the way to relieve the burden on us is to give  only missing
data. PRO:  It would be easier and quicker to just give the outside of
California data and would sidestep for the
 moment the ongoing jurisdictional question.  Con:  Without Enron
cost data for the California ISO and PX transactions, the PUC
 would not be able to arrive at what they want -- a profit and loss
picture.  We would have a hard time representing to the PUC that  the
combination of the PUC data and the Enron data would be all that they need
to calculate the answers to Request Nos. 7-10.

4. TURN OVER EVERYTHING BUT PRICE
 This option would simple omit the price data.  Pro:  It would not
reveal the profit and loss information.  Con:  It would not reveal the
profit and loss information.  In other words, the PUC is clear that this is
what they are after.  By giving them everything else, we
 would in effect be telling them we will not turn over profit and
loss.  Moreover, by piecing some of it together with the ISO and PX
data, the PUC might be able to put together a revenue picture which will be
quite large, but just not the cost or expense side.

5. DECLINE TO PRODUCE THE DATA
 We would tell Harvey Morris that Enron has reconsidered its position
for the following reasons:  (1) Our firm belief that the PUC is  not
entitled to the profit and loss data they are seeking; (2) in his latest
email, Harvey has made it clear that the PUC wants more  data (1999)
than we discussed earlier; (3) continued threat that if they do not like the
transaction data they will come back and  ask for profit and loss
information that we do not believe they are entitled to; (4) Commissioner
Wood's statement that the purpose  of this investigation is to get
money from market participants in the hands of consumers; (5) investigation
by the AG into activities  of other market participants and the notice
that other governmental agencies are cooperating -- who are we producing
this  information to and for what purpose; (6) Enron favors public
disclosure of trading data but only if all participants are required to
do so; (7) Enron is a small player in this market and many other market
participants are not involved in the process BPA etc.    PRO:  This
may be the only way to preserve Enron's challenge to the jurisdiction of the
PUC to get this data.  Moreover, in the  current political
environment there is no assurance where this information will be leaked.  It
also makes sense to see what FERC  will do with their published 11/1/00
report on investigation date. Under this option, we file our formal
objections and sit back and  wait.

6. ME TOO
 Upon reflection, we agree with the approach taken by the other
market participants.  We will not produce until the protective order  is
modified and then only data that is within the PUC jurisdiction.  PRO:  This
makes it look like all the market participants are  acting in concert
and really is no different than option 1 above.  Moreover, if you read
Reliant's responses, they appear ready to  turn over financial data if
the protective order is modified. (Terry and Mike Day are both out of their
offices today.)  Note that  Williams is adopting a strategy that says
the PUC needs to go to Superior Court to enforce its subpoena.  This may be
met with  strong opposition by the PUC given their California
constitutional contempt authority.

7. MOVE TO QUASH BEFORE THE ALJ
 Here we would raise all of the arguments that we have about why the
PUC does not have jurisdiction and fight it out on the merits  before the
ALJ.  PRO:  The ALJ is a forum to raise the jurisdictional questions.  It
has the least procedural risks of being  dismissed.  CON:  Reading
the tea leaves, we believe it unlikely that the ALJ will determine that the
PUC has no jurisdiction.
 Moreover, because the PUC has its own constitutionally granted
contempt power, the PUC will take the view (according to Mike  Day) that
they need not go to the Superior Court for enforcement.  They will also take
the view that the Superior Court has no  jurisdiction  to hear our
appeal.  Appeals have to go to the PUC and those orders are appealable at
the Court of Appeal level.   Thus, the only de novo review of our
objections might be at the ALJ level.

8. FILE DECLARATORY RELIEF ACTION IN FEDERAL COURT IN CALIFORNIA
 We would claim federal question jurisdiction under the Federal Power
Act and in particular the provisions of 824(g) under which the PUC
issued its subpoena in part.  The dispute to be decided is whether the PUC
has the jurisdiction to seek the profit and  loss information from the
wholesale market.  The authority for this would be Mississippi Power & Light
v. Mississippi  487 US  354 (bright line between wholesale market regulated
by FERC and the retail market regulated by states); Bristol Energy Corp v.
New Hampshire 13 F.3d 471 (1st Cir. 1994)(federal question whether state
agency can inquire into business and financial data  in the wholesale
market but found no cognizable claim.)  PRO:  The federal forum may be more
even handed than the ALJ, but  the question is whether we can state a
cognizable claim.  There may be greater protections from disclosure of the
information as  well.  CON:  The PUC may continue on a parallel track unless
we are able to obtain injunctive relief.  The PUC might seek  discovery of
the same information in the Federal court proceeding.  We should assume that
this action will trigger the strongest  response from the PUC and/or the AG
in form of further investigations or alternative forums for getting the same
information (e.g  unfair business practice suit, price gouging,
anti-trust etc.).   We should anticipate deposition requests for traders
etc.  By taking  this position, we will clearly be conceding that if
FERC asks for the data it is germane to their authority.

9. SEPARATE RESPONSES/STRATEGIES FOR DIFFERENT ENRON ENTITIES
 It may make some sense to chart a different course for Portland
General, EES and EEMC and continue to produce some data from  those
entities.  PRO:  The information provided for these entities is not likely
to generate profit and loss information that would be  germane to the fight
we are about to engage in (e.g. EES's description of % off tariff rates for
example.)  For Portland General,  Dave Aamodt is out of the office and
not able to participate in any change of direction discussions.

Hope this is helpful.
Thanks
Gary

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com


Try to go to this if you can.

Tom

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Vuittonet, Laura
Sent:	Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:30 AM
To:	Bass, Eric; Baumbach, David; Bryan, Gary; Buss, Jd; Farmer, Daren J.; Larubbio, Morris; Martin, Thomas A.; Olsen, Michael; Redmond, Brian; Schwieger, Jim; Weldon, V. Charles
Subject:	FW: Weather Class

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Moore, Kevin G.
Sent:	Tuesday, January 08, 2002 1:27 PM
To:	Roberts, Mike A.; Kaminski, Vince J; Bennett, Stephen; Shively, Hunter S.; Villarreal, Alex; Rangel, Ina; Rybarski, Amanda; Hillis, Kimberly; Stevens, Adam; Marquez, Jose; Hogan, Irena D.; Black, Tamara Jae; Vuittonet, Laura; Shore, Geraldine
Subject:	FW: Weather Class

Wednesday , January 9th 2002

Good morning All ,

The Research Weather Team will be presenting another Weather Class.

The Class will be conducted on Wednesdays  at 10: a.m. in room ECS-06980.

The Speaker/Teacher  will be Jose Marquez.

Please join us.......

Assistants : Please forward to your groups..

Everyone is invited.

                                                                       Thanks
                                                                    Kevin Moore


Julie,

Sorry for the delayed response.  I can't express to you how excited I am to
be coming out there this weekend.  After the last week and a half of work I
am in desperate need of rest and relaxation (that of course means lots of
shopping).  As far as activities go, I'm pretty much up for anything.  My
guess is I'm probably going to want to take a quick nap when I get in
Saturday morning before starting the weekend's activities, but after that I
say we just get going.  The symphony sounds incredible as do the races or the
polo match so I'll just leave the final choices to your discretion.  I would
definitely be up for a trip to the zoo if you want to go, but considering I
go there every time I'm in San Diego I could miss it in order to do/see some
other things.  The only things I insist upon are ample time outdoors and good
seafood.  Anyway,  I arrive in San Diego on America West flight 2180 at about
9:00 a.m. and leave Monday at 6:10 p.m. so we've almost got three full days
to work with.

Love,
Susan

-- Also, if you could give me an idea of what kind of items I need to pack
depending on our activities it might prevent me from committing gross
overpacking...Thanks.


In connection with Enron's PATS offering, we're attaching a Cover Letter and
clean and marked drafts of the revised Preliminary Offering Circular, Purchase
Agreement, Remarketing Agreement and Trust Agreement.

Best regards,

Hazel Mukuna

(See attached file: Cover Letter.doc)

(See attached file: Preliminary Offering Circular.doc)  (See attached file:
Preliminary Offering Circular.REDLINE.doc)

(See attached file: Purchase Agreement.doc)        (See attached file:
Purchase
Agreement.REDLINE.doc)

(See attached file: Remarketing Agreement.doc)     (See attached file:
Remarketing Agreement.REDLINE.doc)

(See attached file: Trust Agreement.doc)           (See attached file: Trust
Agreement.REDLINE.doc)

______________________________________
This message, together with any attachments, is intended only for the
use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
information that is legally privileged, confidential and exempt from
disclosure.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
message,or any attachment, is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
this message in error, please notify the original sender (or the WSPR
Help Desk) immediately by telephone (212-858-1000) or by return
E-mail and delete the message, along with any attachments, from
your computer.  Thank you.

 - Cover Letter.doc
 - Preliminary Offering Circular.doc
 - Preliminary Offering Circular.REDLINE.doc
 - Purchase Agreement.doc
 - Purchase Agreement.REDLINE.doc
 - Remarketing Agreement.doc
 - Remarketing Agreement.REDLINE.doc
 - Trust Agreement.doc
 - Trust Agreement.REDLINE.doc


oh man.  I sent to you yesterday---the solutions piece.  did a bunch of work
on it.  here it is.


Here is a managers' amendment that Chairman Leach of the Banking Committee
is considering.  I would imagine that section 10 would be of particular
interest to Enron, given that it provides unconditional legal certainty for
all wholesale, individually negotiated derivatives.  This provision may
prove controversial, and there is little time between now and our Thursday
markup.

Steve Ganis
Counsel
Committee on Banking and Financial Services
U.S. House of Representatives
202 226-0469

 - MANAGERS_001.PDF


Thanks for the analysis, Mary.  It does a lot to clarify the context within
which the PX is conducting their investigation.  If your analysis is right,
it seems like the PX has virtually nothing to stand on.  But why do they
continue to pursue a course of action that seems inconsistent with their
tariff and FERC's recent rulings?  Why do you think the PX believes that they
have a case (or the right to publish a letter about us) against us??  Before
we meet with Sladoje, I'd like to get a better understanding of their
legal/regulatory side of the argument.


HEREWITH A LETTER THAT KEN MIGHT WANT TO SEND TO CALLUM MCCARTHY
Dear Callum,
I much enjoyed chatting with you in Aspen: it is always a relief to meet
a regulator who tries to get the process right, and then lets the chips fall
where they may.
In its efforts to remain open to new ideas, Enron has established an
advisory council consisting of academics, business people, political gurus
and the like (Irwin Stelzer is a member). This council meets twice a year
with Enron executives. Our next meeting is scheduled for October 31 at our
London headquarters ( we have a dinner the previous evening, at which we
review the state of political play around the world; you might find it
interesting).
One of the suggestions at the Aspen meeting was that traditional
regulation of energy markets might usefully give way to, or at least learn
some lessons from, financial regulation. Since you are one of the few
regulators who has had experience both in financial markets and in utility
regulation, we are hoping that you might be willing to share some ideas with
us on this subject. A 30-minute talk followed by what I promise will be a
very lively discussion would be perfect from our point of view.
We know how pressed you are for time, but are hoping you will favor us
with your thoughts on this interesting and difficult subject.
KEN: I don't think you can offer him a fee.


Temp file until the IT group completes the Internet version.


you had this guy too?  i'm glad i had someone in tax representing me.  i had
to explain to him what trading was.
---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 07/19/2000 07:08 AM
---------------------------
From: Michael Norris@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 07/19/2000 06:23 AM
To: Eric Bass@ECT, Timothy Blanchard@ees, Larry F Campbell/HOU/EES@EES,
Niclas Egmar/HOU/EES@EES, Kyle Etter@ECT, Tyrell Harrison@ECT, Micah
Hatten/HOU/EES@EES, Molly Hellerman@AZURIX, Steve
Hirsh/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ted Huang@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS,
Crystal Hyde@ECT, John Lang/HOU/EES@EES, eric_mason@enron.net, Henry
Montana/HOU/EES@EES, Stanton Ray@ect, Robin Rodrigue@ECT, Eric Scott@EES
cc:
Subject: Performance Data

Good Morning!

I wanted to let each of you know that I had no problem collecting sufficient
performance data to present you to the Corporate PRC on Wednesday.  After the
meeting I expect the results will be released to each of your PRC
Supervisors.  You should expect them to complete your performance evaluation
and schedule a meeting with you to discuss it.  If they do not, it is up to
you to make the first move and ask to schedule the meeting.

Again, I enjoyed the opportunity to meet each of you and learn a bit of what
you do.  I look forward learning even more.

Best Regards.


John,

Steve Rose (X 54682) should be the contact.  I would like to participate if
possible.

R. Grube


Attached is the revised working group list.  Feel free to contact the members
of your group and get started.  Keep in mind that some people do not know
that they were "volunteered", so your initial communication should include
that information.

Please keep me posted on your progress (e.g. copy me on e-mail
communications) and please circulate your objectives, deadlines, scope of
your working group and any other general information to your fellow working
group chairs.

Thank you for your willingness to lead and good luck in your efforts.


The new Purchase Agreement looks nonexistent.  Did you intend to attach
something for me to review?

	Kevin Ruscitti
	11/13/2000 04:42 PM

		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Updated Line Pack Gas Purchase Agreement form provided by Vector.

Dan,

Please take a look at the new Purchase agreement and let me know what you
think.

Thanks,

Kevin


I received your fax, and will arrange for filings and searches shortly.  I
need to know the location of the chief executive office of each Amoco
entity for purposes of UCC searches.  Thank you.

Lech Kalembka
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft
100 Maiden Lane
New York, NY  10038
Tel.: (212) 504-6918
Fax: (212) 504-6666
E-mail: lech.kalembka@cwt.com

==============================================================================
NOTE:  The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you must not read, use or disseminate the information.  Although this email and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect
that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by Cadwalader, Wickersham
& Taft for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use.

==============================================================================


---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT on 07/07/2000 11:14
AM ---------------------------

Joseph_B_Knauth@reliantenergy.com on 07/06/2000 10:12:38 AM
To: biggsbg@bp.com, mike.grigsby@enron.com, jdownie@rstw.com,
john_mccullum@dell.com
cc:
Subject: FW: Bobby Knight Cartoon

---------------------- Forwarded by Joseph B Knauth/TTG/HouInd on
07/06/2000 10:06 AM ---------------------------

David M Gagliardi
07/03/2000 10:46 AM

To:   Joseph B Knauth/TTG/HouInd@HouInd
cc:

Subject:  FW: Bobby Knight Cartoon

---------------------- Forwarded by David M Gagliardi/TTG/HouInd on
07/03/2000 10:45 AM ---------------------------

"Bob Frain" <bfrain@knight-cap.com> on 07/03/2000 08:02:10 AM

Please respond to <bfrain@knight-cap.com>

To:   "Pat Murphy" <pmurphy@knight-cap.com>, "Paul Giordano"
      <pgiordano@knight-cap.com>, "Rich Fosmoen" <rfosmoen@knight-cap.com>,
      "Brian Pigott (E-mail)" <b.pigott@motorola.com>, "Brooke Clark
      (E-mail)" <ebrookie8@hotmail.com>, "Chris Birt (E-mail)"
      <cbirthing@hotmail.com>, "Christine Barkley (E-mail)"
      <CBarkley@cami.com>, "Dave Gagliardi (E-mail)"
      <dgagliardi@noram.com>, "Doug Coole (E-mail)" <dwcoole@yahoo.com>,
      "Erik Lange (E-mail)" <erik.lange@hughessupply.com>, "Eugene Feeney
      (E-mail)" <eugene.t.feeney@rssmb.com>, "Lindsey Pigott (E-mail)"
      <lpigott@hotmail.com>, "Mary Criaco (E-mail)"
      <wagongap@email.msn.com>, "Maura Tobin (E-mail)"
      <Maura.Tobin@pfizer.com>, "Pat Maloy (E-mail)"
      <pmaloy@ect.enron.com>, "Pat Murphy" <pmurphy@knight-cap.com>,
      "Rebecca Parrilla (E-mail)" <Rebecca.Parrilla@abnamro.com>, "Sean
      Barrett (E-mail)" <seantobias@yahoo.com>, "Sharon rayner (E-mail)"
      <sarayner@mail.ev1.net>, "Tim Boyd (E-mail)" <tboyd@amcities.com>,
      "Tim Hurley (E-mail)" <timmyhurley@aol.com>,
      <CASHMONEYBILLS@YAHOO.COM>
cc:

Subject:  FW: Bobby Knight Cartoon

-----Original Message-----
From: thfrain [mailto:thfrain@rcn.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 02, 2000 11:45 PM
To: RICK TRIOLA; Sharon Rayner; Ric McAdams; MARGARET FRAIN; Mike Rose;
Lucanese@aol.com; Jason Malmquist; Edwards, Grant; doug coole; Bob
Frain; Danny Davidson
Subject: Fw: Bobby Knight Cartoon

PASSING on some humor
----- Original Message -----
From: "William Calderaro" <wcalderaro@altuspartners.com>
To: "Tom Lester" <tlesterhome@aol.com>; "Tom Frain" <thfrain@rcn.com>;
"Thomas Paxson" <jpaxson@epix.net>; "Steve Simonic"
<mailto:Stephen.C.Simonic.2@nd.edu.; "Scott & Alison Russell"
<srussell@iwaynet.net>; "Rob Sypeck" <rsypeck@Lehman.com>; "Mark&Kelly"
<mkj@chesco.com>; "Marc & Cathryn Danielcyzk" <mdanielczyk@home.com>;
"Kellett McConville" <kmcconville@chicagoblackhawks.com>; "Keith Pechin"
<peach135@usa.net>; "Jonathan Cohen" <joco2000@aol.com>; "Jim Olensky"
<Jim_Olensky/Allied_Holdings@AlliedHoldings.com>; "Jim Mayhall"
<mailto:jmayhall@ix.netcom.com.; "James Whitesel"
<Whitesel@BellAtlantic.Net>; "Chutivanich, Kate" <kchutivanich@fcb.com>;
"Big Al" <auszynski@earthlink.net>; "Anthony DiIenno" <pnman22@aol.com>;
"Adam Holtz" <aholtz@judge.com>
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2000 8:47 AM
Subject: Bobby Knight Cartoon

>
>

(See attached file: bha_b_nai.exe)

 - bha_b_nai.exe


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 09/22/2000 06:51 PM -----

	Sara Shackleton
	09/22/2000 06:50 PM

		 To: Greg Johnston/CAL/ECT@ECT, Brian Kerrigan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cris
Sherman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, bordenr@macleoddixon.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Alberta prepay - confirms

Attached are revised commodity swap confirms.  I didn't change the rate swap
and we're still waiting for input from the bank.


This org. chart head count totals 135, with an additional 34 that should be included from Peggy Hedstrom's org. chart sent from the Canada office which totals 169 for NETCO Energy Operations.

If you have any questions please contact Leslie Reeves @ X37962.

Thank you,
Leslie Reeves


Mike,

Thanks for the invitation. See you on Friday,
April the 27th.

Vince

Mike Fowler@ENRON
04/11/2001 01:45 PM
To:	Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Vince,

I've been out of the office the last few days.

As we discussed Friday, Veronica and I hope you can join us, the Stocks and
the Chaneys (Craig Chaney is with EnronCredit.com) for dinner at 7:00 Friday,
April 27th.

Directions from Research and Gosling:

Go west on Research Forest

Turn left the 2nd time you cross Alden Bridge (stop sign after Kuykendall,
shopping center on right with Albertson's, Exxon).

Go approximately 1.4 miles.

Will pass park and elementary school on left.

Take next left - Noble Bend.

Turn right on the 2nd street - Freestone Place.

We are # 30 Freestone Place - the next-to-last home on the right.

Phone # 281-362-7267

Mike
x39990


Hi everyone.  Hope you all had a great Thanksgiving.
We had a great time in Chicago and are waiting to see
if it will happen again next year :-)  Just kidding
Michaela!

Okay, we need everyone to put in their wish lists so
some of us can start our shopping.  Please try and
give a couple of suggestions for yourselves-not just
one-in case we can't get something!  Also, I don't
think all adults have put in suggestions for their
children.

Once again, is it $125.00 per couple and $30.00 for
children??????  Also, what about the gift for Mom and
Dad??  Hope to hear from you all soon!
Megan

By the way, some suggestions for Ben and I---
anything we registered for that we didn't get
(Ross-Simons)
Any Spode stuff (except glasses)
I'll think of some other stuff

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
http://shopping.yahoo.com/


Kim:  Can you obtain the name of Glendale's bond counsel (lawyer's name, phone number, email, etc.)?  Thanks.  SS

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Sent:	Friday, October 05, 2001 1:59 PM
To:	Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	City of Glendale

Sara,

Believe it or not, we are very close getting our signed ISDA from the City of Glendale.  Steve Lins, the City attorney had a couple of questions which I will attempt to relay without having a copy of the documents.

1)  I am assuming that he obtained a for legal opinion letter or document of some sort.  This document references a confirmation and we are not sure what this references.  Typically, it references a transaction, which in this case, there are no transactions yet.  He feels this reference should be deleted.  What is your opinion regarding this? [Shackleton, Sara]    If we have no transaction on the books, then he can delete the reference.  Marie:  Have we received an opinion from Glendale?

2)  We sent him a couple of form documents to facilitate the documents required under the ISDA.  One form ws a form resolution.  They have already received City Council approval to enter into financial tranactions and to enter into an ISDA with us.  Steve is going to get a certified copy of this Resolution.  Will this suffice? [Shackleton, Sara]    I'll review their resolution again.  If it references our ISDA and all transactions, it should be fine.  (This is part of the reason why we need a legal opinion)

When you return, I may try to do one last conference call to alleviate any unanswered questions.  I think we will have an executed ISDA with the City of Glendale by the end of next week.  I am going to be out there meeting with them on Wednesday.

Thanks for your help,

Kim


FYI

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mayes, Fran
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 10:06 AM
To:	Nelson, Cheryl
Subject:	RE: any updates?

	Yes, I spoke with Mark on last Thursday and the revisions are complete.  He will let me know today when the
	three of us can meet to discuss.

	Fran

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Cheryl
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 10:03 AM
To:	Mayes, Fran
Subject:	any updates?

Hey Fran, I am just following up from our meeting the week before last.  Were we able to make any progress since then getting any revisions?


While I think the law actually works that way, we have avoided putting it in writing so far.  The way the web site works, the decision to accept or reject the offer happens almost instantaneously so the question is almost meaningless.  The time we care is when the internet slows down or the connection goes down and they don't see that we accepted their offer and then they try to get out.  I guess the other question would be how do they withdraw the offer?  The website doesn't provide a mechanism for that.  If we say it has to be in writing and delivered to the relevant trader, in practice it might not be an issue.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Boomer, John
Sent:	Thursday, September 20, 2001 3:46 PM
To:	Taylor, Mark E (Legal)
Subject:	Coal Purchases Online

Mark:  We met briefly about 2 months ago when I interviewed here.  I just joined Wayne in the coal group and am working on a Master Coal Purchase and Sale Agreement.  The counterparty has suggested some language (highlighted below) which sounds o.k. to me.  However, Wayne suggested I run it by you to see if it worked with the way the website actually operates.  Please advise.

Thanks,
John Boomer
x59502

(b) A Transaction may also be initiated by Counterparty offering to buy or sell Coal by clicking on the designated boxes on the Enron Online Website.  Such website is not, and shall not be construed as, an offer to buy or sell by ENA.  ENA may accept or reject Counterparty's offer at its sole discretion and Counterparty may withdraw offer at any time prior to acceptance at its sole discretion.  A Transaction shall be deemed executed at the time that ENA first signifies its acceptance of Counterparty's offer, accessible on such website.  ENA may also send a written confirmation memorializing the Special Terms and Conditions of a Transaction, but in the event of any conflict, the terms of the written confirmation shall prevail. The terms and conditions of this Master Agreement shall govern any Transaction(s) initiated on such website.


schedule and meeting file
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 01/21/2001 04:15 PM -----

	Kelly Johnson
	01/17/2001 03:21 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary Joyce/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Teresa Wright/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Comp Committee Notice - January 22, 2001


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 05/12/2000
12:57 PM ---------------------------

"James Love" <James.Love@msl.redstone.army.mil> on 05/12/2000 12:20:58 PM
To: <Phillip.M.Love@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Fwd: Excuse Me!

I hope you have a sound card on your computer at work.  If not, send it home.
Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 12:15:48 -0500
From: "Ed Dowling" <Ed.Dowling@msl.redstone.army.mil>
To: "James Love" <James#032#Love@msl.redstone.army.mil>
Subject: Excuse Me!
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_D189F9A1.9AFB9FA9"

Edmund A. Dowling
LTC, AR
Product Manager, ATAS
(256) 876-4800
Beeper (800) 374-4434 Pin # 13050

 - Scuse Me!_1.avi


Hi gang.  I want to meet tomorrow regarding the CES storage deal.

Around 1:30PM?  Let me know.

thanks


Just so you know, this is what I sent Redmond about that 311 case.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hull, Bryan
Sent:	Tuesday, August 14, 2001 7:16 AM
To:	Redmond, Brian
Subject:	FW: Section 311

Brian, this is a pretty good explanation of the case thus far......

Commissioner Wood is aware of the conflict between PG&E (now EPGT) and Southern Union, probably because of lobbying by Southern Union, and that is why he raised the issue.  Southern Union states in its initial brief (#9 below) that it opposes the high demand rates that it says EPGT proposes to charge for a service that does not incorporate the consumer protections of Order No. 636 and argues that FERC should impose Order No. 636 standards on PG&E.  I was watching a video stream of the meeting, and the whole discussion seemed to come out of nowhere.

Here are the facts in this case.

1)	On December 20, 1999, PG&E Texas Pipeline, LP (the predecessor to EPGT Texas Pipeline, LP) filed a petition with FERC for approval of transportation rates under Section 311 along , as they were required to do.  (All intrastate pipelines that perform Section 311 service must either have their rates approved by FERC or they must charge rates that are approved by a state regulatory body for a similar service.)  PG&E's filing proposed, in addition to the usual interruptible service, a firm Section 311 service as well as an interruptible parking and lending service.  PG&E also filed a revised Statement of Operating Conditions to reflect the new services.

2)	On February 25, 2000, Southern Union Gas Company, an intrastate transportation customer of PG&E, filed a late motion to intervene and raised issues which it stated should be addressed in a hearing.  PG&E opposed the late intervention, but FERC granted it on April 14, 2000.  (PG&E stated that Southern Union was intervening in order to gain leverage in renegotiating its contract for intrastate service.)

3)	Southern Union submitted data requests to PG&E on April 13 and April 17.  PG&E attempted to get a protective order issued, but FERC rejected their request.

4)	A settlement conference was held on September 7, 2000.

5)	A Staff Panel was convened on October 2, 2000, in order to conduct an advisory, non-evidentiary proceeding for oral arguments on the issues, with instructions to make recommendations to the Commission within 90 days.

6)	On November 1,  2000, FERC requested 5 pages of additional information from PG&E in order to complete the application in the proceeding, which PG&E provided on November 8th.  On December 8th, PG&E provided additional information in response to a FERC data request.

7)	On January 10, 2001, Southern Union submitted a proposed alternative to the cost of service and rate design that was filed by PG&E.

8)	On January 17, El Paso Field Services informed FERC that PG&E Texas Pipeline, LP had been acquired by El Paso on December 22, 2000, and that the name was changed to EPGT Texas Pipeline, LP.

9)	On January 24, 2001, EPGT Texas and Southern Union filed initial briefs.

10)	On July 17, 2001, EPGT filed supplemental comments in response to the discussion at FERC summarized below, where Commissioner Wood inquired about the extension of some Order No. 636 and 637 provisions to Section 311 service providers.  EPGT stated that, if FERC proceeds with this policy, it should do so in a generic rulemaking and not in an individual pipeline proceeding.  On July 30, 2001, Southern Union filed reply comments opposing EPGT's supplemental comments.

11)	On August 3, EPGT filed an amended Statement of Operating Conditions, which provides for electronic nominations, two additional nomination cycles, bumping, clarified and updated credit provisions, modified quality provisions to protect system integrity, and more clearly defined authorized overrun service.

The NGPA gives FERC authority over intrastate pipeline rates for Section 311 service and requires that such service be provided on a non-discriminatory basis, but there is some question as to whether it gives FERC authority to require, for example, compliance with Order Nos. 636 and 637.

Please let me know if this is enough detail (or maybe it's more than you wanted!!).


Market Participants
  SC Settlements Contacts

  After the 10 Minute Settlement Market Simulation conference
call on Friday August 25,  Market Participants' concerns of readiness were
brought before the ISO Officers.  The Officers discussed these concerns as
well as the two previous delays (June and August) in implementing Ten Minute
Settlements.  Weighing all of these issues, the ISO believes that there is a
compelling need to put a pricing structure in place to realize a substantial
saving in real time energy costs.

  Therefore, the ISO has decided to continue with the Ten
Minute Settlement implementation date of September 1, 2000.

  Nancy Traweek
  Director, Market Operations

  Byron Woertz
  Director, Client Relations


Rosalee:
Thanks very much for helping arrange the meetings.  Here is the list thus
far.  There may be additions.  I've also suggested dates for the meetings.

May 3rd in Sacramento (after the meeting with David Freeman):

Governor Davis (he spends a lot of time in Los Angeles and you may find that
he prefers to meet there).
House Speaker Robert Hertzberg
House Republican member John Campbell (Republican's point person on energy
issues)
House Minority Leader David Cox
Senate Majority Leader John Burton
Senate Minority Leader Jim Brulte

May 4th--Morning, in Los Angeles
John Bryson, CEO Edison International
Governor Davis (unless the meeting occurs on the 3rd in Sacramento)

May 4th--Afternoon, in San Francisco
Bob Glynn, CEO PG&E

Joseph Alamo from our office will provide you with the phone numbers for John
Campbell, David Cox, John Burton, and Jim Brulte.  I assume that your office
has the numbers for John Bryson and Bob Glynn.  If you do not have the
numbers, let me know and I will get them for you.  Thanks again for your help.

Best,
Jeff

	Rosalee Fleming
	04/25/2001 03:09 PM

		 To: Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Ken Lay Meetings in CA

We will do it.  Maureen and I have already talked about the Freeman meeting
and we are making Steve hotel reservations, wherever we put Ken.

Rosie

Janel Guerrero
04/25/2001 02:19 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Ken Lay Meetings in CA

Since Steve Kean is planning to accompany Ken on his meetings next week in
CA, please be sure to cc Maureen McVicker on all meetings that are scheduled
so she can manage Steve's calendar.

Thanks.


I suspect that there are several options.

He is such a sweet, cute, smart thing.  You will like him. He is very very
charming.

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 08/02/2000 11:12 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re:

He can be helped though right?  Block out Friday afternoon?

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	08/02/2000 10:58 AM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re:

We've known, but is has gotten to be a bigger issue as he has gotten older.

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 08/02/2000 10:53 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re:

Are you just finding out?  I know there are things that can be done to help
that situation.  Do you want me to block you out for Friday afternoon as
well.  You need to get this taken care of quickly for Michael's sake.

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	08/02/2000 10:40 AM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re:

Michael problems. He has ADD and some other lesser learning problems.  We are
going to meet  with the specialist next week.

I'm going to try to take off Friday afternoon as well.  We are thinking of
changing his school, and Neil and I need to go visit a new one.

HECTIC!

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 08/02/2000 09:59 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re:

Are you ok?

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	08/01/2000 06:03 PM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject:

Please protect Thursday afternoon, August 10th for me.  I have some important
personal stuff to take care of.


Please send a copy of our non-disclore to Cysive, Inc

6200 Overbrook Lane
Houston, Texas,  77057

wparmer@cysive.com

713 974-9003
713 974-8062 fax
713 515-2268 cell


Confidential Settlement Document Under CPUC Rule 51

PARTIES:

This is a reminder that PG&E is hosting the next workshop regarding "Gas
Accord II" issues, at PG&E headquarters, Room 300, 77 Beale Street, San
Francisco, this Wednedsay and Thursday, October 11-12.  We plan to start at
9:30 a.m. and end around 3:30 p.m., on both days.  PG&E will provide lunch
on both days.

Attached is our proposed agenda for this workshop, which will address market
issues and cost-of-service and rate issues related to PG&E's California Gas
Transmission system.  In addition, we are pleased to note that
representatives of the California Energy Commission will make a presentation
regarding their forecast of future electric generation demand.

We also will use some time at this week's workshop to inform the
participants about new issues various parties have identified since the
first workshop on September 14.

PLEASE RSVP IF YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THIS WEEK'S WORKSHOP, so that we can get
an accurate head-count for the lunches we will order.  Please RSVP to:
Darcy Morrison, e-mail D2Mr@pge.com, or telephone at (415) 973-6644.

We look forward to this week's workshop, which we think you will find very
informative.

Best regards,

Frank Lindh    Ray Williams
Attorney    Director
415-973-2776   415-973-3634
frl3@pge.com   rdw0@pge.com

 <<Agenda 10-11&12-00 Workshop.doc>>

 - Agenda 10-11&12-00 Workshop.doc


FYI below.

Not sure if telling Tim this is OK is high on Whalley's list.  You were more directly involved in this sort of thing.  Could you tell Tim that a copy will remain with Enron and we need to get that done ASAP since transition and duplication is currently going on?

Thanks.

GP

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Piper, Greg
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 2:59 PM
To:	Belden, Tim
Cc:	Delainey, David W.; McMahon, Jeffrey; Whalley, Greg; Schuler, Lance (Legal); Koehler, Anne C.
Subject:	FW: Power Fundamentals

FYI below.  Understand your concern.  I asked McMahon and/or Delainey to ask Whalley to give you the OK.

My interpretation:

Enron does own all the applications that were ever developed over the years, including all fundamentals, and the list of those applications that Enron owns and is licensing to UBS is on schedule 27.4, which I think includes the apps on West Fundamentals.  If they are not on schedule 27.4, then they are by definition still owned by Enron and we keep them and they are not licensed to UBS.

Then these applications, that are labeled Proprietary Software and are licensed to UBS, are then sub-licensed back to Enron in the exhibits to the Comprehensive License Agreement in the Enron Field of Use, which is described in section 7.1 of the CLA.

Either way, Enron either owns the application(s) or has a sub license back in its Field of Use in the Gas and Power business.

I also asked Anne Koehler in legal about this issue and she agrees with my interpretation.  She and Lance Schuler helped write a substantial portion of the agreements and is scheduled to go to work for UBS.

If you still want Whalley to say OK, I understand.

Thanks.

GP

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Piper, Greg
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 10:49 AM
To:	McMahon, Jeffrey; Delainey, David W.
Cc:	Muller, Mark S.
Subject:	FW: Power Fundamentals

See below.

Tell Whalley and Belden today that we own these applications and need our copy.  We want to send estate people to Portland ASAP to get our working version on an Enron owned server.

Thanks.

GP

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Koehler, Anne C.
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 10:41 AM
To:	Piper, Greg; Schuler, Lance (Legal)
Cc:	Delainey, David W.; Belden, Tim; Whalley, Greg; Presto, Kevin M.; Perlman, Beth; Hillier, Bob
Subject:	RE: Power Fundamentals

Greg-The Power Fundamentals applications are owned by Enron and, along with all the other Enron developed software, will be licensed to UBS on an exclusive basis for use in the North American Power and Gas business.  UBS will then sublicense these applications back to Enron for use by Enron within the permitted "Enron Field of Use".  The Enron Field of Use is described in Section 7.1 of the Comprehensive License Agreement and includes all the activities that Enron is allowed to pursue within the North American Power and Gas business.

Further more, under the Comprehensive License Agreement, Enron is required to maintain and protect any Trade Secrets relating to the Gas and Power Business and to the proprietary software developed by Enron.  See Section 16.9 to the Comprehensive License Agreement.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Piper, Greg
Sent:	Tuesday, January  22, 2002 9:25 AM
To:	Koehler, Anne C.; Schuler, Lance (Legal)
Cc:	Delainey, David W.; Belden, Tim; Whalley, Greg; Presto, Kevin M.; Perlman, Beth; Hillier, Bob
Subject:	FW: Power Fundamentals

Give me your opinion on Tim Belden's issue below please.

Schedule 27.4 lists power fundamentals applications and the CLA says that the Enron Parties are licensing it to UBS.  I also talked with Bob Hillier on this and he agreed with me and said that the Enron Parties own everything and the schedule lists what we are licensing to UBS.  West Power Fundamentals was developed by the Enron Parties and is owned by the Enron Parties.

Let me know your thoughts.

GP

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Perlman, Beth
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 8:50 AM
To:	Piper, Greg
Subject:	FW: Power Fundamentals

any ideas?

Beth

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Belden, Tim
Sent:	Friday, January 18, 2002 11:46 AM
To:	Perlman, Beth
Cc:	Presto, Kevin M.; Whalley, Greg
Subject:	RE: Power Fundamentals

Hi Beth,
I hate to be uncooperative, particularly after all that we have accomplished together, but I can't see where in the Enron/UBS agreement it says that Enron needs or gets to keep the West Power Fundamentals system.  Furthermore, I have no assurances that Enron is in a position to keep this information confidential as Richard Schweiger is rightfully looking for a new job.  Richard could easily understand what we are doing and use it to secure a job with AEP, Pacificorp or someone else here in town.  I don't mean to question Richard's integrity, but these are very strange times.

Until I receive word from UBS or Greg Whalley I am sitting tight.

Again, sorry to be uncooperative, but it doesn't appear to me that our interests are aligned right now and I need to protect our competitive advantage.

Regards,
Tim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Perlman, Beth
Sent:	Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:54 PM
To:	Belden, Tim; Presto, Kevin M.; Will, Lloyd; Heizenrader, Tim
Cc:	Fallon, Jim; Piper, Greg; Delainey, David W.
Subject:	Power Fundamentals

All,

I have been requested to obtain a working copy of all fundamental systems.  The estate wants to preserve them and they should be available for use within the estate.

I will dedicate systems resources to working with your groups.  Your cooperation is greatly appreciated.

I will have Richard Burchfield coordinate these efforts.  Richard Schweiger will assist us in Portland.

Thanks,
Beth


Thanks, Tana!

-MP

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Jones, Tana
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 9:11 AM
To: Segura, Stephanie; Palmer, Mark S.
Cc: McCullough, Travis
Subject: NDA Lists

 << File: OFFLINE CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENTS.doc >>

 << File: ONLINE CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENTS.doc >>


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 03/08/2001
01:32 PM ---------------------------

Andrew_M_Ozuna@bankone.com on 03/07/2001 11:41:43 AM
To: Phillip.K.Allen@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Sagewood Phase II

---------------------- Forwarded by Andrew M Ozuna/TX/BANCONE on 03/07/2001
01:41 PM ---------------------------

Andrew M Ozuna
03/06/2001 03:14 PM

To:   "George Richards" <cbpres@austin.rr.com>
cc:
Subject:  Sagewood Phase II

George,

Thank you for the opportunity to review your financing request for the
Sagewood
Phase II project.  Upon receipt of all the requested information regarding the
project, we completed somewhat of a due diligence on the market.  There are a
number of concerns which need to be addressed prior to the Bank moving forward
on the transaction.  First, the pro-forma rental rates, when compared on a
Bedroom to Bedroom basis, are high relative to the market.   We adjusted
pro-forma downward to match the market rates and the rates per bedroom we are
acheiving on the existing Sagewood project.  Additionally, there are about
500+
units coming on-line within the next 12 months in the City of San Marcos,
this,
we believe will causes some downward rent pressures which can have a serious
effect on an over leveraged project.  We have therefore adjusted the requested
loan amount to $8,868,000.

I have summarized our issues as follows:

1.  Pro-forma rental rates were adjusted downward to market as follows:

     Pro-Forma                           Bank's Adjustment
     Unit           Unit Rent Rent/BR    Unit Rent      Rent/BR
     2 BR/2.5 BA         $1,150          $575           $950           $475
     3 BR/Unit      $1,530         $510       $1,250         $417

2.  Pro-forma expenses were increased to include a $350/unit reserve for unit
turn over.

3.  A market vacancy factor of 5% was applied to Potential Gross Income (PGI).

4.  Based on the Bank's revised N.O.I. of $1,075,000, the project can support
debt in the amount of $8,868,000, and maintain our loan parameters of 1.25x
debt
coverage ratio, on a 25 year amo., and 8.60% phantom interest rate.

5.  The debt service will be approx. $874,000/year.

6.  Given the debt of $8,868,000, the Borrower will be required to provide
equity of $2,956,000, consisting of the following:

     Land -                   $1,121,670
     Deferred profit& Overhead     $    415,000
     Cash Equity              $1,419,268
     Total                    $2,955,938

7. Equity credit for deferred profit and overhead was limited to a percentage
of
actual hard construction costs.

(See attached file: MAPTTRA.xls)

 - MAPTTRA.xls


Yikes!  I just realized that tomorrow is Mason's birthday party.  I know
Michael would love to go.  Both my husband and I work, but I will attempt to
take off and bring him.  Thanks for the invitation.

Kay Mann


Start Date: 4/11/01; HourAhead hour: 11;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041111.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/11/01
  TIE_POINT: SLVRPK_7_SPP
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_TOBY
  ENGY_TYPE: NFRM


Entex increase ROM:

Huntsville/Woodlands/Conroe  11500 by 8 days = 92,000

Big Ticket 50000 by 8 days = 400,000

Ami


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

December 29, 2000 5:00pm through January 2, 2001 12:00am

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:      ALSO SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

Impact:  EES   POSTPONED
Time:  Sat 12/30/2000 at  9:15:00 PM CT thru Sat 12/30/2000 at  11:45:00 PM CT
 Sat 12/30/2000 at  7:15:00 PM PT thru Sat 12/30/2000 at    9:45:00 PM PT
 Sun 12/31/2000 at  3:15:00 AM London thru Sun 12/31/2000 at  5:45:00 AM
London
Outage:  Add RSM to EES EB Routers
Environments Impacted:  EES
Purpose: Remove traffic from the ATM links for improved reliability, prepare
for migration to Gigabit to connect to Ardmore.
       Each network will be down approximately 10 minutes for switchover.
Backout: Move routing functionality back to Ardmore
Contact(s):  Vincent Fox  713-853-5337

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET: No Scheduled Outages.

MESSAGING:     SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS:  SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

SITARA:  No Scheduled Outages.

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY:     POSTPONED
Impact:
Time:  Fri 12/29/2000 at  7:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 12/29/2000 at  9:00:00 PM CT
 Fri 12/29/2000 at  5:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 12/29/2000 at  7:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 12/30/2000 at  1:00:00 AM London thru Sat 12/30/2000 at  3:00:00 AM
London
Outage:  EB & 3AC Lucent Switch Software Upgrade
Environments Impacted:  All
Purpose: To allow for IP trunking
Backout: Back-up optical disks will be used to reload all translations.
Contact(s):  Cynthia Siniard   713-853-0558

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:  No Scheduled Outages.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center
(713) 853-5536   Information Risk Management

Specific Applications Help:
Unify On-Call      (713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call     (713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS   (713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP    (713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR      (713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support      (713) 327-3893  [Pager]


Enron Energy Services has one single entry point for all customer leads and service issues - The EES Business Center.  Your assistance is requested in routing all retail customer calls to this center.  The Business Center can manage general customer service requests or provide information on EES product offerings.

The number for the EES Business Center is 800-337-7837 (800-EES-SVCS) or internally, calls can be transferred to x59390.  E-Mail address is: EESBusinessCenter@enron.com

Thank you for taking the time to route these calls appropriately.  Your assistance is critical to Enron's customer acquisition success and to ensure our customers' satisfaction.


493987, is not there deal


Kate, please ask Sean Crandell if the following deals need the "special
phrase" ..The Parties agree and acknowledge that this Transaction is
connected with the transaction referenced in Deal No. 347356.1 entered into
between the Parties on May 31, 2001.

Jack Wells of Conoco called and said that the phrase should be included in
confirmations: 506549.01..506550.01..506551.01 and 507417.01 and 507430.01.
Please ask trader if deals are related to the 347356.01.  Sharen has inquired
once before and we were under the impression that the deals were separate and
not included.  Please let us know.

Thanks
Stephanie
---------------------- Forwarded by Stephanie Piwetz/HOU/ECT on 02/08/2001
10:12 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Sharen Cason                           02/08/2001 10:07 AM

To: Stephanie Piwetz/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Conoco deals

---------------------- Forwarded by Sharen Cason/HOU/ECT on 02/08/2001 10:06
AM ---------------------------
   Kate Symes                01/29/2001 06:22 PM

To: Sharen Cason/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Deal 507430 and 507417

Jack Wells is the contact for both - I've added his name to deal #507417.
According to Sean Crandall, these deals are separate from 347356. That deal
was a sale, and the deals entered today are all buys. Sean said we're just
buying back the MW we originally sold them. But I think that's the only
connection. Let me know if you need more of an explanation from the traders,
but our take is that these deals are separate.

Thanks,
Kate

	From:  Sharen Cason                           01/29/2001 04:05 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Deal 507430 and 507417

Are these two deals part of the original Conoco deal # 347356 that they are
extending or something different?  We need to know because we have to add
something in the confirmation if they are extensions of the original deal.
Also, is Jack Wells the contact for both?

Thanks!