Hello again,

If these contracts are going to be assigned immediately to Mitsui, isn't the
issue of a guaranty a Mitsui issue? Is this addressed in the EPC contracts?

If an Enron entity must give a guaranty, I would think we would want ENA to
give it, to be replaced by a Mitsui guaranty unless we have some safeguard
against the possibility of paying Mitsui and Mitsui not paying GE, so that we
would have to pay twice.

Kay

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/12/2000 01:31
PM ---------------------------

jeffreye.smith@ps.ge.com on 06/12/2000 01:06:56 PM
To: Brian.D.Barto@enron.com, Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc: tim.lederach@ps.ge.com, Jeff.Blumenthal.ECT@enron.com

Subject: RE: Tax Language Changes to On/Off Shore Contracts for Vitro

Brian,
Thanks.  The changes to the on & off-shore contracts are OK.
I have replied to an e-mail from Kay concerning the "letter agreement", of
earlier today.  As far as I am concerned, we are ready to go there (you were
copied).
Kay indicated that the consolidation agreement would be today's focus of
attention.  I have not seen any feedback pursuant to my 1/Jun/00 e-mail.
    <<Enron Monterrey/Vitro>>
Your comment about the parent company guaranty reminds me that the above
e-mail also called for such a guaranty from Enron, as Enron NA is no longer
the purchaser.
Regards,
Jeff Smith

-----Original Message-----
From:   Brian D Barto [mailto:Brian.D.Barto@enron.com]
Sent:   Monday, June 12, 2000 11:10 AM
To:   Jeffreye.smith@ps.ge.com; Kay Mann; Jeff Blumenthal
Cc:   tim.lederach@ps.ge.com
Subject:   Tax Language Changes to On/Off Shore Contracts for Vitro

 << File: VITRO5-on-r1e.wpd >> << File: VITRO5-off-r1e.wpd >>

Jeff:  I have picked up the changes to Section 5.2.2 per the email exchange
by
Tim and Jeff B.

Please note that Jeff B. condition that a parent guarantee be provided has
been
picked up in Section 3.7 and Exhibit C-1 has been modified to show General
Electric Company as the parent.

These are the final versions to date:

(See attached file: VITRO5-on-r1e.wpd)(See attached file:
VITRO5-off-r1e.wpd)

Jeff Smith:  PS  Kay Mann said she would close up the Consolidation
Agreement
discussions with you too.

-----
Sender: jeffreye.smith@ps.ge.com
To: Brian.D.Barto@enron.com
Cc: Kay.Mann@enron.com, stephen.swift@ps.ge.com,
   patricia.gonzalez@ps.ge.com, karl.siverling@ps.ge.com,
   william.danaher@ps.ge.com, john.schroeder@ps.ge.com,
   scott.terhune@ps.ge.com, alfredo.graciansilva@ps.ge.com
Subject: Enron Monterrey/Vitro
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 23:09:27 -0400
Importance: high
X-Priority: 1
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2651.58)

Brian,
Here are my comments on several items.
*   The consolidation agreement.
*   In 1.b, thanks for reflecting the GE suggestion.  However, near the
end of the paragraph, the word "remedy" should move to immediately after
"exclusive".
*   In 8, the reference should be to paragraph 10.a, not 11.a.
*   In 10.a, it does not look like the wording in my 30/May/00 e-mail
was picked up.
*   In 12 and 13, Enron has added new wording since the preceding
issuance of this document.
*   In 13, is all of this wording necessary and applicable.  At the end
of the first long sentence, the word "turnkey" is used.  Of course, this is
an equipment supply contract for GE.
         Also, I believe the contracts do state what is in GE
scope via clauses 1.27, 1.86 and 3.1.  So, the last sentence is redundant.
*   More importantly, these two clauses could be interpreted as
establishing a GEPS/GEIOC consortium.  This is something GE had advocated as
the approach in as single contract for tax purposes in Mexico.  GE can still
go either way, although the single document approach is more straightforward
(and that is what we initialed in your offices last month).  Enron wanted
split contracts.  These clauses may undo what Enron was attempting to
achieve in this regard.
*   In 14, which has been added by Enron in the latest version of the
consolidation agreement, the GE entities seem to be prevented from getting
an extension of time under one contract if there is a problem with
performance under the other.  This is contrary to the words in the former
Enron clause 5, which has now been eliminated.  This clause 14 should be
removed.
*   Regarding the "swap" payments for tax purposes, to benefit both
Enron and GE:
*   The amount paid to date on the Monterrey unit, under the MOU, is
$25,101,733.  What GE proposes it to:
*   Revise the payment schedule for the contracts such that payments
totaling this amount are due 2-3 days after contract signing.
*   Execute a separate letter, to be signed at the same time as the
contracts, formally dissolving the MOU.  The letter would call for GE to
refund this same amount 2-3 days after receipt of the payment under the
contracts.
            We need to draft this letter, which will
hopefully be one page.  The text of such a letter could include the
following wording:
            "Pursuant to clause 30.3 of the now executed
On and Off Shore contracts for this project, the MOU dated ______ is made
null and void.  Once the initial payment(s) called for in said contracts
have been made, the monies in the amount of $25,101,733.00, which were paid
under the MOU will be refunded to (Enron entity)."
*   This would get the monies to the appropriate Enron and GE entities.

      In a related matter, since the legal Enron entity has
changed, GE requests a parent guarantee (using form already shown in the
contract(s)).
Regards,
Jeff Smith

-----Original Message-----
From:   Brian D Barto [mailto:Brian.D.Barto@enron.com]
Sent:   Wednesday, May 31, 2000 11:01 AM
To:   jeffreye.smith@ps.ge.com; Kay Mann
Subject:   Consolidation Agreement

 << File: Mac Word 3.0 >>

Kay and Jeff:

Please review and comment.  Kay's comments are included and do not look
unreasonable.  Jeff please edit this document and send back to Kay and I to
see
what you are thinking about in the clause that used to be 11, now 10, I
think.

(See attached file: GE Vitro WRAP rev 2.doc)


With Ken Lay's resignation, you undoubtedly have questions about Enron's management structure and what lies ahead for the company.  The purpose of this communication is to begin to answer those questions and lay out the direction we plan to follow as we regroup and rebuild.

First, the Creditors Committee has proposed that the Board of Directors retain an interim CEO to focus on the restructuring process.  This is a positive sign that the Committee believes Enron will provide greater value as a viable ongoing business.

The Enron Board of Directors has approved Stephen Cooper as interim CEO and chief restructuring officer.  Steve is the managing partner of Zolfo Cooper, a corporate recovery and crisis management firm with more than 30 years experience leading companies through operational and financial reorganizations.

Steve and his firm will work with members of Enron's current management to develop and implement a comprehensive plan to restructure the company and emerge from bankruptcy.

As you know, Enron has entered into an agreement with UBS Warburg for the sale of NetCo, Enron's wholesale gas and power trading organization.  In preparation for the transition of NetCo to UBS, Greg Whalley has resigned as president and COO of Enron to assume a position with UBS Warburg.  We want to thank Greg and the NetCo employees joining UBS for their contributions to Enron and wish them great success going forward.

In addition to engaging Steve, Enron has formed an Office of the Chief Executive.  I will join Steve in that office as president and chief operating officer, and Ray Bowen will join us as executive vice president and chief financial officer.

We will provide additional information regarding the roles and responsibilities of Enron's entire management team once those become more fully defined.

Thank you for continuing to support Enron by performing your job everyday.  The ongoing uncertainty about our future, coupled with the constant media scrutiny, makes this situation difficult for all of us. While no one can control the media, we can and will define our leadership and devise our strategy for moving ahead.  And in doing so, we will build a more certain future for our company and our employees.

Link to the press release: http://www.enron.com/corp/pressroom/releases/2002/ene/012902Release.html


Ken -

Good morning.

As a follow up to the voice mail that I left for you, following are some
background and preparatory notes for a potential phone call today between
Chancellor Reed and yourself.  Communications and indications from the UC/CSU
team are that he may call you today as a follow up to your discussion with
him on February 2, 2001.  As I mentioned at the Executive Committee meeting
on Tuesday, 2/20/01, all things are moving along well in California with our
clients, PG&E and SCE.  The current exception to the "smooth sailing" is
UC/CSU.  Tom Riley, the account manager for UC/CSU, has prepared the
following outline of business concerns, sequence of events and suggested
talking points.

Ken, thank you for your assistance and continued participation with this
client.

Regards - Dan

******************************************************************************
*********************
Business Concerns

UC and CSU have business concerns regarding Enron's action to De-DASR their
accounts.  They have not communicated their concerns with enough detail that
would allow us to address them, but I have been able to surmise that they
consist of the following:

1.  UC/CSU is now a bundled access customer instead of a direct access
customer.  AB-1X, recently signed by Gov. Davis, has ban language preventing
large commercial/industrial customers from going Direct Access.  Per Jeff
Dasovich of Enron Gov. Affairs, it is not clear, but possible, that if we had
not De-DASRed the accounts, that UC/CSU might have been grandfathered as a
direct access customer.  Further, SB-27X (still pending), which is Senator
Bowen's attempt to reverse the ban language of AB-1X, may have a financial
ramification for customers switching to and from Direct Access status.
Dasovich is investigating further.

2.  UC and CSU bought approximately 130 meters from Enron as we implemented
the contract.  Our action is forcing the utility to remove these
University-owned meters, meaning that their meters will become useless.  We
are currently using those meters to provide daily 15 minute interval data as
required in our contract. (Our operations and billing group have come up with
a transition plan that SCE has agreed to. SCE would install dual-sockets
allowing for the installation of the SCE meter, while keeping our meter in
tact, mitigating their concern.  At this point, UC and CSU are not listening
to our business solutions so we have not received feedback from them on this
solution).

3.  We have a contractual obligation to be the Universities scheduling
coordinator (SC).  As a result of our action, we are no longer their SC.
They are concerned this may inhibit our ability to act as their SC for their
recent proposal to the ISO under the Demand Reduction Program.

Sequence of Events

February 1 - I informed the UC/CSU electricity oversight board leaders and
contract administrators of Enron's decision.  I walked through the power
point presentation.  They expressed no concerns at that point, and even
expressed appreciation we were standing by our contract.  I sent the UC and
CSU contract administrators the letter later that day advising them of our
decision.

February 2 - Ken Lay called Chancellor Reed assuring the Chancellor that we
will honor the contract.  I have since heard that this call was extremely
well received and that the CSU campus VPs have been advised of the call and
Ken's assurances that were communicated.  We offered the call to the UC
President as well, but were channeled to his SVP.  By the time I made contact
with the SVPs administrator, we had begun receiving letters (below), so I
backed off on arranging the call.

February 5 - UC and CSU contract administrators inform us they have been
speaking to their regulatory advisor and asked for some clarifications.
Maureen Palmer and I speak to the contract administrators and answer their
questions.

February 8/9 - UC and CSU send letters to their PG&E and SCE account managers
advising them they have concerns regarding Enron's decision, and that they
(PG&E and SCE) should only De-DASR on the Universities' request.

February 12 - I received a letter from the UC/CSU contract administers asking
for clarifications regarding our action, and requesting we re-DASR their
accounts.

February 14 - I responded with a letter providing them with responses to
their clarification questions, but did not offer to re-DASR their accounts as
they had requested.

February 16 - UC informed me they were unhappy we did not comply with their
request to re-DASR and indicated they would be sending another letter.  I
suspect this letter will express potential legal recourses.

February 20 - CSU and UC informed they would hold off on the letter pending
outcome of a call between Chancellor Reed and Ken Lay.

Throughout the entire process, I have been asking that the business
administrators meet with us so Enron can hear their concerns.  I gather CSU
would like to do this, however, UC is more inclined to write letters and seek
legal remedies.

Suggested Talking Points for Call and Desired Outcome

1.  We were faced with a difficult business decision, and made our California
decision with our customers in mind.  We have kept our contracts in tact.
Other energy service providers have left the market and their customers.

2.  We are an energy outsourcing company.  We should source supply from the
"best available" source in the marketplace. We feel we have a contractual
right to have made the decision.

3.  Desired outcome is that we want to sit down with the University business
administrators to listen to and address their concerns.  We have not been
afforded this opportunity to date though we have offered.  However, the
Chancellor needs to understand we are not willing to re-DASR their accounts
in the meantime.

I will be available for the debrief with Ken if desired.  I can be reached at
925-543-3703 (office), or 925-548-0326 (mobile) if you have any questions.

Regards, Tom
******************************************************************************
*********************


Demand charges and triggers are done.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Baxter, Bryce
Sent:	Thursday, January 10, 2002 10:28 AM
To:	Keiser, Kam
Subject:	Questionable Deals in 200112 Accrual.xls

Kam - I've had the coordinators go through all of the terminated counterparties, and here is another list of deals we are questioning.  Can Risk review the deals that are demand charges/triggers and either verify their validity or zero them out?  I'm meeting with Logistics this afternoon to review the deals that flowed past the termination dates to ensure that they are correct.  This needs to be done today if possible, as we will have to run the accrual on Monday.  Thanks.
 << File: Questionable Deals in 200112 Accrual.xls >>


Hello Andreas,

My title is Managing Director, Research, Enron North America
Enron Corp.
1400 Smith
Room EB1962
Houston, TX 77002
(713) 853 3848
(713) 646 2503 (fax)

Bullet points:

1. The challenge of modeling price dynamics in the energy markets.
- seasonality
- fat tails
- jumps
- mean (or floor) reversion

2. Price volatility in the energy markets: definition and estimation
3. Adapting value-at-risk for the energy markets:
- combination of physical and financial contracts
- correct representation of price dynamics and inter-market price
relationships
- capturing complexity of energy contracts
4. Historical vs. Monte Carlo simulation vs. scenario analysis. Pros and cons
of different approaches.
5. Regulatory uncertainty and value-at-risk

Feel free to edit the bullet points if you see a typo (no spell checker on my
laptop for AOL).

Vince


please approve

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	enron_update@concureworkplace.com@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 9:35 AM
To:	Jeffrey Shankman
Subject:	<<Concur Expense Document>> - GH11-19-01

The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: Gary J. Hickerson
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: GH11-19-01
Report Total: $7,999.49
Amount Due Employee: $7,999.49

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://expensexms.enron.com


approved

	"Fergus, Gary S." <GFergus@brobeck.com>
	05/16/2001 06:25 PM

		 To: "Richard B. Sanders Esq. (E-mail)" <richard.b.sanders@enron.com>
		 cc: "Andy Pickens (E-mail)" <apickens@gibbs-bruns.com>, "Barrett H. Reasoner
(E-mail)" <breasoner@gibbs-bruns.com>, "David J. Noonan (E-mail)"
<djn@pkns.com>, "Jean Frizzell (E-mail)" <jfrizzell@gibbs-bruns.com>,
"Michael L. Kirby (E-mail)" <dcastro@pkns.com>, "Michael Molland"
<MMolland@brobeck.com>, "Mike D. Smith (E-mail)" <msmith1@enron.com>, "Peter
Meringolo" <PMeringolo@brobeck.com>, "Robert C. Williams (E-mail)"
<Robert.C.Williams@enron.com>, "Susan Bisop (E-mail)"
<sbishop@gibbs-bruns.com>
		 Subject: Defense Group Internet Site

I am writing for your approval to enter into an agreement on behalf of Enron
and the Enron outside counsel to enable all of us to have access to the
joint work product website for the Gordon Hendricks group.  The Website will
have the following information:

Event Calendar
Docket and pleadings for Electricity Litigation around the West
Pleadings in the major cases we are all in
Repository for all working drafts of documents
Repository for letters that are now circulated as attachments

In the future, some defendants may use this system for actual document
productions to government agencies etc.

As I see it, we really have not choice but to join this system if we are
going to participate in the joint defense group.  Shortly they will stop
circulating work product etc. via email and will rely upon this website
instead.

The costs are somewhat unclear but it is intended to be an economy of scale
cost sharing concept.

They cannot start the program until we all sign up and so they are asking
for a quick response.

Thanks
Gary
 <<agreement.pdf>>

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com

 - agreement.pdf


Kathy-

Thanks for the email.  Kali was not able to make last Sunday's game due to a
schedule conflict that I had.  Plus, she will not go to the last game because
her best friend's birthday party is at the same time.  I had her skip another
friend's party to make the one game she did participate in (all the softball
girls schedule their parties on Sunday so as not to conflict with those
games!!).  If it's not too late, do not order a trophy for her.  She really
was never much of a team participant.  I'm hoping her enthusiasm this fall
will be like last fall and not this spring.  Thanks for all your help, time
and effort.

Susan Pereira

P.S.-
Do you know who some of the U10 girls coaches will be??  Will you be
coaching?  I did not sign up to coach because I may asst. coach my son's U6
team.


Hi Guys,

This is just intended to be a list of issues to be addressed in each project
specific contract - a "to do" list to finish each one.

Kay

"Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)" <kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com> on 11/16/2000 08:39:26 AM
To: "'Dale.Rasmussen@enron.com'" <Dale.Rasmussen@enron.com>,
Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc: "Johnson, Lee L (PS, SSEP)" <lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com>

Subject: FW: ltr to Kay Mann: Site specific references in GE Form agreemen
t.DOC

Dale and Kay:

Lee and I looked at the proposed site specific letter and we wondered if
what Dale did for the summary sheet may not be a better format.  Dale, can
you forward it to the Kay and I to look at and consider.

Thanks.

Kent

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 12:10 PM
To: kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com
Subject: ltr to Kay Mann: Site specific references in GE Form
agreement.DOC

Hi Kent,

Hope this is helpful.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/14/2000 11:09
AM ---------------------------

"Thompson, Peter J." <peterthompson@akllp.com> on 11/13/2000 05:16:49 PM

To:   "Kay Mann (E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>, "Pipitone, Paul"
      <paulpipitone@akllp.com>
cc:   "Pipitone, Paul" <paulpipitone@akllp.com>, "Pipitone, Paul"
      <paulpipitone@akllp.com>, "Cobb, Chris" <chriscobb@akllp.com>

Subject:  ltr to Kay Mann: Site specific references in GE Form
      agreement.DOC

 <<ltr to Kay Mann: Site specific references in GE Form agreement.DOC>>

Attached is the memo setting forth the specific Site references in the
GE Turbine Agreement.
(See attached file:  Site specific references in GE Form agreement.DOC)


Here is a summary of my telephone conversation with Jay Hopper of KN Energy:

1.  KN has permitted its 550 MW Arkansas plant (and received its Entergy
interconnection agreement) and is out for bid on tolling agreements.  They
have two counterparties who have bid a 15 year tolling agreement --437 MW,
mid 7,000 heat rate; 5.75 KW-mo.; 113 MW duct firing, 4.75 KW-mo.; 3.00 mill
escalating variable O&M charge.  KN has also conducted construction bids.
[For our LM-6000 activities, seeing all this information would be extremely
valuable].

2.  KN has a draft air permit on its Jackson Michigan plant.  They will know
in 45 days if approved.  All other permits received. Since this project was
first in the cue when we last talked to KN, I suspect something negative has
happened to slow it down.

3.  KN has sites in Oklahoma, Dallas and Chicago (4).

4.  KN and another party have 6 7FA turbines for June '01 projects in
Illinois.  KN supposedly controls the turbines.  I asked KN if they would be
interested in doing deals in other states with these turbines.  They said
possibly.  The other counterparty would need an equity participation in the
end project.  I also told them that to the extent that they did Illinois
projects, we could be of assistance to them on reg. cap. pricing and sales
tax strategies.

5.  KN has sites in Ohio and Geary, Indiana where a coal affiliate would take
back a 30 year 100 mw PPA for both sites.  Given this contract, KN may
entertain doing a deal with a merchant component.

6.  I asked Jay how KN would be interested in ENA participating in these
projects.  KN is not interested in taking too much commodity risk.  Hence,
our proposal of doing a fixed price toll for 5 years and a floating index
price for an additional 15 years would not be of interest to them (evidently
Kinder laughed at the proposal; though in Jay's telephone message he
indicated that Kinder was interested in the structure).  If there was a floor
that covered debt service in the merchant years (along with some upside
participation for KN--Jay threw out a 20% participation), then they would be
interested in doing a deal.

7.  They would also entertain selling a 50% or 100% interest in these
projects.

8.  Jay told me that KN is looking to make a steady and predictable income
from these plants.  Thus far, his group has not made any money.  My sense is
that they are looking for money or a story (ENA name).  I would suggest
taking a pass at purchasing the Arkansas plant (to get their attention and
see their project information) in an effort to get involved in the 7FA and
ECAR projects.  If KN does have a long-term tolling agreement, then would
should be able to lay off a large portion of the financial risk associated
with the Arkansas transaction.  We could also look at applying Don's
structure to the Arkansas transaction.  Needless to say, the 7FAs slots, if
real, would allow ENA to do something strategic in Florida and Iowa.


comments to the swap docuemnts
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 09/21/2000 08:41 AM -----

	"Ruth Schonfeld" <Ruth.Schonfeld@macleoddixon.com>
	09/21/2000 05:56 AM

		 To: <Dpef@blakes.com>, <warren.nishimura@blakes.com>,
<brian.kerrigan@enron.com>, <clement.abrams@enron.com>,
<derek.davies@enron.com>, <greg.johnstone@enron.com>,
<peter.keohane@enron.com>, <sara.shackleton@enron.com>,
<soma.ghosh@enron.com>, <tana.jones@enron.com>,
<blair.fleming@royalbank.com>, <ian.mcarthur@royalbank.com>,
<tracy.ross@royalbank.com>, <bpechersky@velaw.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Attached Files from Rick Borden

 - MACLEOD-.DOC
 - MACLEOD-.DOC


I'm checking with Chris Foster and Chris Mallory, who are apparently the ones
initiating these trades. Both are out of the office right now, so it might be
tomorrow before I can get back to you on this. But my guess is that if APX
does not want to receive confirms on daily deals, then we don't need to send
them. I'll let you know for sure as soon as I talk to the traders.

Thanks,
Kate

From: Kimberly Allen on 03/29/2001 03:52 PM CST
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Automated Power Exchange

Hey Kate! I received a phone call from a Jim Cross from Automated Power
Exchange. Now that we are confirming daily's he mentioned that he did not
want to receive dailys per the APX Master Agreement. He told me that all
trades are anonimus under the APX agreement and we should not be confirming
theses. Examples: #563948 and #563381. Some of the trader doing these trades
are Chris Mallory and Les Rawson. Could you ask them is we should continue to
confirm these daily's or not?

Thanks

Kimberly

Enron Power Marketing, Inc.
Kimberly Indelicato Office:713-853-3031
Trading Support Fax:713-646-2443
kallen3@enron.com


I would like to discuss an idea for earnings related to Phase V - OCIP


Please be advised that the company's trading policy prohibits any Enron
employee from trading any products that the company trades.

	Roger Gahunia/ENRON@enronXgate
	06/05/2001 10:04 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: PLEASE READ

Tana,
;
I have a commodity futures account at A.G. Edwards, but there are currently
no positions in the account.; I do not think that will change;any time in the
foreseeable future.
;
Roger Gahunia
;

-----Original Message-----
From: Enron Announcements/Corp/Enron@ENRON;on behalf of;Mark Taylor (Vice
President and General Counsel)@ENRON
Sent: Tue 6/5/2001 6:42 PM
To: NYMEX Hedge Exemption List@ENRON
Cc:
Subject: PLEASE READ

To:;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;;
Department:; ;; ENA Legal

From:;; ;;;;;;; Mark Taylor;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; Date:;; May
11, 2001

;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; Vice President and General Counsel

Subject:;;;;;;; Enron North America Corp. NYMEX Hedge Exemption Applications

;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;
; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;;

We are in the process of preparing applications for position limit exemptions
for ENA,s NYMEX energy commodities futures trading.; These applications
require that ENA represent whether its officers, employees, owners, or agents
have a power of attorney, control or have a financial interest in any related
commodity future(s) account either individually or acting with another person
pursuant to express or implied agreement.

Please direct any responses to my paralegal, Tana Jones, via intercompany
email or call her at (713) 853-3399 by the end of business on June 15, 2001
if you have any power of attorney, control or have a financial interest in
any commodity futures account (other than an ENA or other trading affiliate
account).

IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A COMMODITY FUTURES ACCOUNT, YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESPOND TO
THIS REQUEST.


I hadn't heard the 2 1/2 hour deal, but then again, I wasn't on the call.
I'll check on pushing the meeting back to 930 to give you a chance to get
downtown before it starts.  Sheila, what do you think?

Kay

"Thompson, Peter J." <pthompson@akllp.com> on 03/06/2001 02:54:17 PM
To: <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: GE meeting on Friday

The earliest flight gets me to Houston at 8:33.  Is that sufficient time
to get to your offices, or should I plan on flying in on Thursday night?
Also, it is my understanding from participating in the conference call
last week that the meeting is scheduled to last no more that 2 1/2
hours.  Is that still the plan?

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 3:07 PM
To: Thompson, Peter J.
Subject: RE: GE meeting on Friday

900 central, so you should be in decent shape.

Kay

"Thompson, Peter J." <pthompson@akllp.com> on 03/06/2001 02:10:15 PM

To:   <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:  RE: GE meeting on Friday

I can be there. Please let me know what time the meeting will begin. I
would like to fly down early that morning, if possible.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 1:09 PM
To: Thompson, Peter J.
Subject: GE meeting on Friday

Hi Pete,

Would it be possible for you to be in Houston this Friday morning for
the
GE meeting?  It would be great to meet you in person, and have you
participate.  What is your availability?

Kay


Could tank the whole US economy!

DJ Greenspan Cites Concern About Electric Sector Investment
Dow Jones International News Service -- July 20, 2000  [Return to Headlines]

WASHINGTON (Dow Jones)--Federal Reserve Board Chairman Alan Greenspan told
Congress Thursday he is concerned that disincentives for investment in the
electricity sector will destabilize the overall U.S. economy.

"The propensity to build new electric power facilities is being
disincentivized," Greenspan said.

"I'm worried about the instability that that creates within the economy and
the difficulties that might emerge as a consequence of that," the Fed
chairman said in response to a query by Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y.

"It is an issue we need to address," Greenspan said.

U.S. utilities have failed to make needed investments in generation plants
and transmission lines over the last decade in the face of regulatory
uncertainty posed by state and federal deregulation efforts.

Energy Secretary Bill Richardson has been touring the country in recent
months, warning that the problem is contributing to power supply shortages
in summer months, when hot weather sends electricity demand - and prices -
soaring.

Richardson says Congress needs to enact a comprehensive bill restructuring
the $215 billion electric industry to end the uncertainty and give the
sector renewed incentive to make needed investments. By Bryan Lee;Dow Jones
Newswires;202-862-6647, bryan.lee@dowjones.com

(END) Dow Jones Newswires 20-07-00

1948GMT

Kim S. Martin
Vice President
Fleishman-Hillard Inc.
1615 L Street NW, Suite 1000
Washington, DC 20036
(202) 828-8827
fax:(202) 293-8105
martinki@fleishman.com


Test message

Vincent Kaminski
Managing Director - Research
Enron Corp.
1400 Smith Street
Room EB1962
Houston, TX 77002-7361

Phone: (713) 853 3848
Fax  :  (713) 646 2503
E-mail: vkamins@enron.com


Please han
----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 09/20/2000 06:04 PM -----

	"JOANNE BENNETT" <joanne.bennett@blakes.com>
	09/20/2000 12:44 PM

		 To: <richard.b.sanders@enron.com>
		 cc: <dan.fournier@blakes.com>
		 Subject: Outstanding Invoices with Frontier Economics

Mr. Sanders:

We have received a telephone call from Kevin of Frontier Economics regarding
outstanding invoices they currently have with respect to Project Stanley.

Kevin indicated that there are three invoices now issued and outstanding (the
earliest dated back to July) and he is wondering when they might expect
payment of the invoices.

Can you give me any idea as to when the accounts will be paid?  I believe
Frontier Economics was looking for payment by direct wire if possible.

Thanks,
Joanne Bennett
Assistant to Dan Fournier
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
3500, 855 2nd Street S.W.
Calgary, Alberta
T2P 4J8
Tel: 403-260-9637
Fax: 403-260-9700
E-mail: joanne.bennett@blakes.com

This e-mail communication is confidential and legally privileged.  If you are
not the intended recipient, please notify me at the telephone number shown
above or by return e-mail and delete this communication and any copy
immediately.  Thank you.


Please amend the ISDA dated 6/12/97 between ENA and the counterparty by
reducing TransAlta's collateral threshold from $15MM (CAD $) to $10MM (CAD
$).  Credit is just reshifting line allocations with the different TransAlta
entities.  The contacts at the cp are:
  Maureen Piercey (credit)  403-267-7987
  Sterling Koch (legal) 403-267-6991
Call with comments or questions.  Thanks

Rgds,
Ed Sacks


TODAY'S HEADLINES
The New York Times on the Web
Monday, November 26, 2001
------------------------------------------------------------
For news updated throughout the day, visit www.nytimes.com

/-------------------Also From NYTimes.com------------------\

Holiday Shopping

Take advantage of special offers and discounts -- on gifts,
travel and luxury items from NYTimes.com's premium
advertisers -- with the Holiday Shopping E-Mail.

http://www.nytimes.com/services/email/email.html#holiday
\---------------------------------------------------------/

QUOTE OF THE DAY
=========================
"I don't dream. I don't cry. But I get migraines."
-ELLEN DUBE, an AIDS counselor at Hlabisa Hospital in South Africa.

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/26/health/26AIDS.html?todaysheadlines

NATIONAL
=========================
3 Teenagers Held in Plot at Massachusetts School

Officials said a massacre may have been averted by their use
of techniques and studies developed after the 1999 killings
at Columbine High School.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/26/national/26PLOT.html?todaysheadlines

-----

For Most, Holiday Travel Is Light and Smooth

By most accounts the return trips home from the holiday
weekend by plane, train, bus and automobile went smoothly.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/26/national/26TRAV.html?todaysheadlines

-----

As Attacks' Impact Recedes, a Return to Religion as Usual

Immediately after Sept. 11 Americans flooded to their local
houses of worship, but polls now indicate that for most
people the spiritual storm has passed.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/26/national/26FAIT.html?todaysheadlines

-----

MORE NATIONAL NEWS:
http://www.nytimes.com/pages/national/index.html?todaysheadline

/--------------------- ADVERTISEMENT ---------------------\
Listen To A Best Seller On Your Free MP3 Player!

The No Spin Zone. Desecration.  Last Man Standing.
John Adams.  Black House. Skipping Christmas. The Fiery
Cross. Germs. Blood and Gold.  Listen to any of these
hot titles - or choose from thousands of others - on your
free MP3 player.  Visit Audible for this special offer!

http://ads.nyt.com/th.ad/th-audible88/audibletext211.26.html/?_RM_REDIR_=http://www.audible.com/nyt/freerio34
\---------------------------------------------------------/

INTERNATIONAL
=========================
Hundreds of U.S. Troops Land 12 Miles From Taliban
Stronghold

Hundreds of marines landed at a makeshift airfield near
Kandahar on Sunday in the first major infusion of American
ground troops into Afghanistan.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/26/international/asia/26MILI.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Taliban Foes Say Kunduz Is Theirs

Northern Alliance commanders said Sunday night that their
troops had captured the city of Kunduz, the last Taliban
stronghold in northern Afghanistan.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/26/international/asia/26KUND.html?todaysheadlines

-----

An American Is Said to Be Killed During a Failed Prison
Uprising

Surrendered Taliban troops staged a revolt Sunday at a
prison where hundreds of them were being held under the
control of the Northern Alliance.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/26/international/asia/26FORT.html?todaysheadlines

-----

MORE INTERNATIONAL NEWS:
http://www.nytimes.com/pages/world/index.html?todaysheadline

BUSINESS
=========================
Cautious Optimism on Shopping

Shoppers went back to the malls after Thanksgiving, but it
is still unclear whether they will spend enough to pull the
economy from its downturn.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/26/business/26SHOP.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Barnes & Noble to Try to Squeeze Better Publisher Deals

Leonard Riggio, the chairman of Barnes & Noble, told
analysts that his company might have to "persuade our
suppliers to be fair to us."
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/26/business/media/26BOOK.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Telecommunications Entrepreneur With a Colorful
Resume

Gary Breshinsky, originally from suburban Long Island, set
up a telecommunications network in Afghanistan in the late
1990's. Now he's considering going back.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/26/technology/ebusiness/26GARY.html?todaysheadlines

-----

MORE BUSINESS NEWS:
http://www.nytimes.com/pages/business/index.html?todaysheadline

TECHNOLOGY
=========================
Europe Plans to Compete With U.S. Satellite Network

Countries are building independent satellite navigation
networks, troubled that the G.P.S. system is run by the
United States military.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/26/technology/ebusiness/26GPS.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Intel Unveils Chip Advances

Intel semiconductor design innovations will help it to
continue doubling the performance of microchips every 18 to
24 months through the end of the decade.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/26/technology/ebusiness/26CHIP.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Telecommunications Entrepreneur With a Colorful
Resume

Gary Breshinsky, originally from suburban Long Island, set
up a telecommunications network in Afghanistan in the late
1990's. Now he's considering going back.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/26/technology/ebusiness/26GARY.html?todaysheadlines

-----

MORE TECHNOLOGY NEWS:
http://www.nytimes.com/pages/technology/index.html?todaysheadline

POLITICS
=========================
Treasury Chief Sees an Economic Brightening

Faced with the likelihood the U.S. is about to be declared
officially in a recession, Paul H. O'Neill said the economy
was "poised for recovery."
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/26/politics/26ECON.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Congress Divided on Stimulus Package

Bush administration officials are stressing corporate tax
cuts and Democrats are insisting on new help for the
unemployed.
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/national/AP-Attacks-Economy.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Ashcroft to Testify Before Senate

Lawmakers critical of the Justice Department's
anti-terrorism campaign will hear directly from the
attorney general in early December.
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/politics/AP-Attacks-Justice.html?todaysheadlines

-----

MORE POLITICS NEWS:
http://www.nytimes.com/pages/politics/index.html?todaysheadline

SPORTS
=========================
Oakland Hammers Floundering Giants

In a game played in a driving rain, the sloppy, reeling
Giants were thoroughly outclassed from start to finish by
the Oakland Raiders.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/26/sports/football/26GIAN.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Hurricanes Leave Questions to Others

With the season beginning its finishing kick, it is fair to
wonder whether any team is good enough to give Miami a good
game in the Rose Bowl on Jan. 3.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/26/sports/ncaafootball/26COLL.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Redskins' Recovery Continues

Squandering a chance to take command of the N.F.C. East, the
Philadelphia Eagles fell to the streaking Washington
Redskins, who have won five straight.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/26/sports/football/26EAGL.html?todaysheadlines

-----

MORE SPORTS NEWS:
http://www.nytimes.com/pages/sports/index.html?todaysheadline

ARTS
=========================
David Robertson: Rapport at the End of a Baton

The conductor of the Orchestre National de Lyon in France
frequently takes assignments with America's top orchestras,
and he's become an audience favorite and a reviewer's
darling.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/26/arts/music/26ROBE.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Are the Wizard's Numbers Just the Tip of the Iceberg?

"Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone"  chases after the
still elusive box office record set by "Titanic," which
earned more than $600 million.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/26/movies/26POTT.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Power Meets Modern Art in Los Angeles

The first major exhibition from the collections of  Eli and
Edythe Broad is now under way at the Los Angeles County
Museum of Art.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/26/arts/design/26ELI.html?todaysheadlines

-----

MORE ARTS NEWS:
http://www.nytimes.com/pages/arts/index.html?todaysheadline

NY REGION
=========================
Nassau County Tries to Reach Budget Accord

Leaders in the Nassau County Legislature are considering a
package of budget cuts and increases in property taxes in
order to avert a state financial takeover.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/26/nyregion/26NASS.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Parking Garages Suffer From Manhattan Security Rules

Parking garage operators in Manhattan say that   in the
aftermath of the World Trade Center   attack they, too, are
suffering.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/26/nyregion/26PARK.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Landlord Kills Tenant and Tries to Commit Suicide, Police
Say

A Queens landlord who had been feuding with a tenant beat
her to death and then poisoned himself by swallowing a
bottle of Drano, the police said.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/26/nyregion/26TENA.html?todaysheadlines

-----

MORE NY REGION NEWS:
http://www.nytimes.com/pages/nyregion/index.html?todaysheadline

OP-ED
=========================
Justice, 200 Years Later
By BOB HERBERT
Last  month, New York State was ordered to pay the Cayuga
Indians a sum which is believed to be the largest
resolution of  an Indian land claim in U.S. history.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/26/opinion/26HERB.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Kangaroo Courts
By WILLIAM SAFIRE
President Bush's initiative to create military tribunals
turns back the clock on all   advances in military justice,
through   three wars, in the past half-century.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/26/opinion/26SAFI.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Rebuilding a Ravaged Land
By M. ISHAQ NADIRI
Afghanistan has great potential for economic development.
There has been much devastation, but the country can be
rebuilt.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/26/opinion/26NADI.html?todaysheadlines

-----

MORE OP-ED  NEWS:
http://www.nytimes.com/pages/opinion/index.html?todaysheadline

HOW TO CHANGE YOUR SUBSCRIPTION
------------------------------------------------------------
You received these headlines because you requested The New
York Times Direct e-mail service. To cancel delivery,
change delivery options, change your e-mail address or sign
up for other newsletters, see http://www.nytimes.com/email.
Check or uncheck the headlines you would like to receive
and remember to go to the bottom of the page and click on
"Save Selections." To change your e-mail address, go to our
help center: http://www.nytimes.com/help.  Suggestions and
feedback are welcome at feedback@nytimes.com.

Please include the following ID number when writing to
feedback@nytimes.com so that we can track any reports of problems:
1120577

HOW TO ADVERTISE
------------------------------------------------------------
For information on advertising in e-mail newsletters or
other creative advertising opportunities with The New York
Times on the Web, please contact Alyson Racer at
alyson@nytimes.com or visit our online media kit at
http://www.nytimes.com/adinfo


I need a number where you can be reached on Friday evening.  I will be
getting the schedule after work on Friday and will call and let you know when
and where our games will be.

D


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 11/03/2000
01:40 PM ---------------------------

Kristian J Lande

11/03/2000 08:36 AM

To: Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jake Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank W
Vickers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elliot Mainzer/PDX/ECT@ECT, Michael McDonald/SF/ECT@ECT,
David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Laird Dyer/SF/ECT@ECT, Jim Buerkle/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jim
Gilbert/PDX/ECT@ECT, Terry W Donovan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff G
Slaughter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ed Clark/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Swerzbin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matt
Motley/PDX/ECT@ECT, Greg Wolfe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim Ward/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Choi/SF/ECT@ECT, John
Malowney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stewart Rosman/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: New Generation as of Oct 24th

As noted in my  last e-mail, the Ray Nixon expansion project in Colorado had
the incorrect start date.  My last report showed an online date of May 2001;
the actual anticipated online date is May 2003.

The following list ranks the quality and quantity of information that I have
access to in the WSCC:

 1) CA - siting office, plant contacts
 2) PNW - siting offices, plant contacts
 3) DSW - plant contacts, 1 siting office for Maricopa County Arizona.
 4) Colorado - Integrated Resource Plan

If anyone has additional information regarding new generation in the Desert
Southwest or Colorado, such as plant phone numbers or contacts, I would
greatly appreciate receiving this contact information.


There is a file that may be useful to you guys.  It will show you all first
of month curves, what gas daily curve they are mapped to and the volatility
curve mapping.

If you ever have a question about your gas daily swaps and what curves to use
take a look at this.

O:/erms/erms_adm/Financial Books (The Family)/Excel Reports/Gas_Daily Mapping
Table.xls


I think we are supposed to do this tomorrow (Monday).

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/29/2001 01:40
PM ---------------------------
From: Catherine Clark/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/26/2001 10:28 AM
To: Roseann Engeldorf/ENRON@enronXgate, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: RE: Prepayment Notice Form

I removed Shazia Sarker's information and added Elizabeth Burnett, our new
Administrative Agent at CSFB.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Engeldorf, Roseann
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 9:43 AM
To: Mann, Kay; Clark, Catherine
Subject: Prepayment Notice Form

See attached.

 << File: Prepayment Notice (for Phase I Property).DOC >>

Thanks,

Rose


Last ETA from Travis' request is attached below.
---------------------- Forwarded by Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT on 10/30/2000 04:00 PM
---------------------------

Justin Timothy@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
10/30/2000 04:42 PM
To: Lisa Lees@ECT
cc:
Subject: ETA

Lisa,

As requested.

Justin
---------------------- Forwarded by Justin Timothy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
31/10/2000 09:42 AM ---------------------------

Alison Keogh
31/10/2000 09:39 AM
To: Justin Timothy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: ETA

Alison Keogh
Legal Assistant

Enron Australia Pty Ltd
Ph: 612 9229 2316
Fx: 612 9229 2350


Approved.

Sally Beck
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 04/19/2000 12:09 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Irena D Hogan                           04/19/2000 08:35 AM

To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Expense Reports

---------------------- Forwarded by Irena D Hogan/HOU/ECT on 04/19/2000 08:33
AM ---------------------------

Brent A Price
04/19/2000 03:35 AM
To: Irena D Hogan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Expense Reports

Approved - please process ASAP

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Irena D Hogan                           04/18/2000 10:34 PM

To: Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Expense Reports

Please review the below expenses and forward back to me for processing.

Thanks,

Irena


Lucy,

Here is the rentroll from last friday.

The closing was to be this Thursday but it has been delayed until Friday
April 20th.  If you can stay on until April 20th that would be helpful.  If
you have made other commitments I understand.

Gary is planning to put an A/C in #35.

You can give out my work numer (713) 853-7041

Phillip


That sounds wonderful to me.
For East Ohio user id is "boydh2", password is "boydh4"
For Peoples user id is "boydh1", password is "boydh6"

If you guys are still working on the CPA or NYSEG local, I MIGHT be able to
help with that better so please let me know.  I'm so glad you cleared this up
with Sampson!

Thanks,
Kara

Chris.Germany@enron.com on 07/18/2000 05:22:49 PM
Please respond to Chris.Germany@enron.com

To: dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com, Kara
Destephanis/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS
cc: John.M.Singer@enron.com, pleanza@enron.com, Angie.Zeman@enron.com
Subject: Re: PNG Local Production July 00

Actually, we should be nominating only 4,000 month from Power Gas and 300
day from Phillips Production.  That works out to about 429 day.

I just spoke to Samson and he agrees the volume for July should only be
4,000 for the month.

AND Angie (my super fantastic, can't say enough good things about her, will
probably be my boss someday and sometimes acts like it,  CNG scheduler) has
agreed to help out any way she can.  She knows escript pretty well.  Chat
with Doug, if you guys agree, Angie can use your ID and password and figure
out how to run all the reports we need back to January.  Also, we will not
know the actuals for July production until September sometime.

Effective August 1st, the Phillip's wells should be transferred to
Clinton's brand new pool and Clinton will also nominate the Power Gas pool
gas.

Doug, John Singer said he does not have any production reports from Heidi.
With Angie's help, we could probably clear up the CNG LDC activity fairly
easy.

Let me know what you guys think.

kdestep@columbiaenergygroup.com on 07/18/2000 02:02:39 PM

To:   " - *Chris_Germany@enron.com" <Chris_Germany@enron.com>, " -
      *pleanza@enron.com" <pleanza@enron.com>
cc:   " - *Kinney, Doug" <dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com>
Subject:  PNG Local Production July 00

Hi Paul and Chris,
 Our friend Sampson at Power Gas still maintains that their local
production behind PNG has not been nominated for July yet, which was 7500
dth/month.  Did you guys do a deal for this gas too?  He usually nominates
it
all on one day, so Clinton/CES needs to coordinate with him what day to do
it
on (right now the gas is out there on his side on the 17th).  I know Heidi
nominated the Phillips gas baseloaded thru the month at 443/day, but I was
not
sure about the Power, until I checked and sure enough the nom isn't out
there
yet.
 I can get help nominating it from PNG to get it through CES' pool but I
want to make sure that's what we need to do.  Just give me the word and I
will
call Sampson to get it done, but I will make it clear to him that this is
the
last month he'll need to talk to me about it.  Thank you very much for the
clarifications!

Kara D. aka the lone ranger at CES


Erika Summers
PO Box 554
Layton, UT 84041
esummers@digitas.com

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Erika Summers


I guess we won't be having dinner for a while, huh?


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 12/27/2000 10:29 AM -----

	"Tetrault, Charles D." <ctetrault@velaw.com>
	12/22/2000 03:28 PM

		 To: "'Carol Alexander'" <carol_alexander@anadarko.COM>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Wright Case -- Enron

Sorry to hear that you have yet not successfully off loaded your duties of
as unofficial secretary of the group.

Andy, not me, will be the Enron representative on the Steering Committee.  I
had subbed at a meeting 10 or so days ago because Richard Sanders had been
tied up on an extended project.  Andy will handle it from this point
forward.

I will ask Andy to copy you on the information that he sends to Tom
Nicholas.

Hope you have a nice holiday.

-----Original Message-----
From: Carol Alexander [mailto:carol_alexander@anadarko.COM]
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 4:00 PM
To: 'Tetrault, Charles D.'
Subject: RE: Wright Case -- Enron

Charles -

Did you mean that you also wanted to participate on the Wright Steering
Committee ?  Our approach has been that only in-house counsel will
participate;  it is only in the event that an in-house attorney is unable to
participate on the committee that outside counsel has been proxied in.
Please advise.

Could you also have Andy cc: me on his E-mail to Tom forwarding his contact
information.  As the secretary (of sorts) of the Steering Committee, I have
been maintaining updated information for the groupl.

Regards,

Carol A. Alexander
Counsel
Anadarko Petroleum Corporation
1200 Timberloch Place
The Woodlands, TX 77380
Phone:(281) 863-7541
Fax:    (281) 863-7538
E-mail: carol_alexander@anadarko.com
Mailing: P.O. Box 1330, Houston, TX 77251-1330

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic transmission and any attached
documents or other writings are intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you have received
this communication in error, please immediately notify sender by e-mail or
collect telephone call to 281-863-7525 for instructions on its destruction
or return. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action
concerning the contents of this communication or any attachments by anyone
other than the named recipient is strictly prohibited.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tetrault, Charles D. [SMTP:ctetrault@velaw.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 11:59 AM
> To: 'Carol Alexander'; Rothschild, George (Marathon)
> Cc: Richard B. Sanders (E-mail); Andrew Edison (E-mail); Thomas A.
> Nicholas (E-mail); Nathan Albert (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: Wright Case  --  Enron
>
> This will follow up on a message that some of you have received from
> Richard
> Sanders.
>
> Andy Edison, who is in-house at Enron, will be the Enron representative on
> the Wright Steering Committee.  I will continue to serve on the Wright
> Scheduling Committee.
>
> Andy's e-mail address can be copied from the cc: field above.  Andy's
> telephone number is changing this week.  He will forward his new phone and
> fax numbers to Tom Nicholas' office shortly.  If you need to reach him
> early
> next week, you can leave a message with Richard Sanders' assistant.
> (713.853.5587).
>
> Tom,  would you please ask the Holland & Hart technical people to take
> whatever action is necessary to authorize Andy's access to the Wright
> extranet site.  In that regard, I am sending a copy of this message to
> Nathan Albert.
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carol Alexander [mailto:carol_alexander@anadarko.COM]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2000 5:33 PM
> To: 'Tetrault, Charles D.'; Rothschild, George (Marathon)
> Cc: Richard B. Sanders (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: Wright Case -- Enron
>
>
> Please advise whether Mr. Tetrault or Mr. Sanders will represent Enron on
> the Wright Steering Committee.  We have agreed to make a concerted effort
> to
> obtain the approval of all Steering Committee members in connection with
> significant group decisions.
>
> Regards,
>
> Carol A. Alexander
> Counsel
> Anadarko Petroleum Corporation
> 1200 Timberloch Place
> The Woodlands, TX 77380
> Phone:(281) 863-7541
> Fax:    (281) 863-7538
> E-mail: carol_alexander@anadarko.com
> Mailing: P.O. Box 1330, Houston, TX 77251-1330
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic transmission and any attached
> documents or other writings are intended only for the person or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged,
> confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you have received
> this communication in error, please immediately notify sender by e-mail or
> collect telephone call to 281-863-7525 for instructions on its destruction
> or return. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any
> action
> concerning the contents of this communication or any attachments by anyone
> other than the named recipient is strictly prohibited.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tetrault, Charles D. [SMTP:ctetrault@velaw.com]
> > Sent: Monday, December 04, 2000 4:23 PM
> > To: Rothschild, George (Marathon)
> > Cc: Richard B. Sanders (E-mail)
> > Subject: Wright Case  --  Enron
> >
> > Chip,
> >
> >  Responding to your message, the Enron in-house attorney with
> > responsibility for the Wright case is Richard Sanders.
> >
> >  His e-mail address, which can be copied from the cc: field above, is
> > Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com.
> >
> >  His telephone number is 713.853.5587.  His fax number is
> > 713.646.3490.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Charles D. Tetrault
> > Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.
> > 1455 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.
> > Washington, D.C. 20004-1008
> > ctetrault@velaw.com
> > 202.639.6551 [voice]
> > 202.639.6604 [fax]
> >
> >           ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
> > The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.
> This
> > email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
> > named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
> > representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any
> > review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if
> > any,
> > or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have received
> > this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return
> email
> > and delete this email from your system.  Thank You
> >
>           ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
> The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.  This
> email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
> named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
> representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
> review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if
> any,
> or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have received
> this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
> and delete this email from your system.  Thank You
          ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.  This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system.  Thank You


Paige wrote me at 430 this am, and said that since she was still up at 430,
she probably won't be home in time for Michael's parties.  Should I just
leave him after gymnastics?  I don't really want to come back the office, but
I do want to go to Anne's.  Hmmm.  If Paige is home by 500, everything might
work.


Hi Vince,

I only just got forwarded this request - I can deal with the UK Gas data
requirments.

Regards,

Anjam
x35383
---------------------- Forwarded by Kyran Hanks/LON/ECT on 01/08/2000 09:21
---------------------------

Margaret Carson@ENRON
31/07/2000 22:12
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kyran Hanks/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Vince Does your group have a Monthly or a Quarterly price history in
nominal terms
for a US onshore Louisiana natural gas price (or a Texas wellhead price ) and
a UK landed beach price for the past 15 years? I am gathering historical data
for Jim O Hara for our Colombia pipeline in South America and these are among
the series of data they are seeking. They would like the data
from a published source in an electronic file if possible.. Their timetable
is by COB Weds this week. Thank you for your help. Margaret


The attached file contains the May '00 Baseload citygate and storage
injection/(withdrawal) requirements.   Please note the caveats in the Comments
worksheet.  We will address those promptly on Monday.    CES personnel note
that the attached file is archived on the network in P:\Energy
Ops\Enron\May_00\  so you don't need to save it elsewhere.

Have a nice weekend.

Doug Kinney
Ph:  703-561-6339
Fax:  703-561-7317

 - May00_FOM_Reqs.xls


Start Date: 4/8/01; HourAhead hour: 14;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001040814.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 14 / Preferred:  12.00 / Final:  11.98)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/8/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_BEAR
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 14 / Preferred: -495.00 / Final: -487.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/8/01
  TRADING_SC: NES1
  PNT_OF_INTRC: SP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 1
  DEAL_NO: 1
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 14 / Preferred: 100.00 / Final:  92.03)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/8/01
  TRADING_SC: ECH1
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1


--------------------------vince kaminski

-----Original Message-----
From: Williams, Robert C. <Robert.C.Williams@ENRON.com>
To: 'Kaminski, Vince J' <Vince.J.Kaminski@ENRON.com>; Davis, Britt <Britt.Davis@ENRON.com>
CC: Derrick Jr., James <James.Derrick@ENRON.com>
Sent: Mon Dec 31 14:21:50 2001
Subject: RE: E-mail Retention

Vince,

Thanks for the email.  This new message from Britt Davis is in response to a recently-received subpoena, and is just a precaution until we can discuss what is required with Wilmer Cutler.  Even though emails would have been deleted from your system we have retained the backup tapes so we have a complete record.  Please let me know if there are some that you wish to retrieve.

Thanks and have a happy New Year.

	 -----Original Message-----
	From: 	Kaminski, Vince J
	Sent:	Monday, December 31, 2001 10:04 AM
	To:	Davis, Britt
	Cc:	Williams, Robert C.; Derrick Jr., James; Kaminski, Vince J
	Subject:	RE: E-mail Retention

	Britt,

	It seems that the problem starts with our IT department. Recently, messages older than
	30 days disappeared both from my Inbox and Sent Items folders. This happened in spite
	of the recent decision to extend the 30-day retention period indefinitely. Several of my associates,
	who were interviewed by David Cohen (for the Special Committee),
	complained to me about the same problem.

	I hope you can look into.

	Vince

		 -----Original Message-----
		From: 	Davis, Britt
		Sent:	Friday, December 28, 2001 6:50 PM
		To:	Blachman, Jeremy; Brown, Rob; Buy, Rick; Causey, Richard; DeSpain, Tim; Frevert, Mark; Harrison, Ken; Horton, Stanley; Kaminski, Vince J; Kean, Steven J.; Koenig, Mark; Lavorato, John; Lay, Kenneth; Mcconnell, Mike; McMahon, Jeffrey; Metts, Mark; Mintz, Jordan; Olson, Cindy; Pai, Lou; Powers, William; Whalley, Greg
		Cc:	Williams, Robert C.; Derrick Jr., James
		Subject:	E-mail Retention
		Importance:	High

			For purposes of complying with outstanding subpoenas, effective immediately, please do not delete any e-mail from the Enron server until further notice.

			Britt Davis
			Enron Litigation Unit
			3-6307


Thanks for the heads up.  I am passing it along to our commercial leader for
that part of the world, Eric Shaw.   mcs

From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 11/01/2001 15:54 CST
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Eastern European Opportunity

Greetings Mark:

Any interest?

Best,
Jeff

	"Daniel Douglass" <Douglass@ArterHadden.com>
	01/11/2001 03:18 PM

		 To: <jdasovic@enron.com>, <susan_j_mara@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Eastern European Opportunity

Jeff and Sue,

I have a potential lead which may be of interest to Enron.  However, I don't
know if you have any interest in Eastern European projects.

Who would you suggest talking to with regard to a Bulgarian power plant
development?  It involves a 25 year requirements contract with the national
energy company, the retrofit of two existing units and building three new
hydro units.  Total around 450 MW.  Party with exclusive deal with government
wants to deal with an engineering company who could finance and do work ( @
$160 million).  Any suggestions on how to proceed?  My guess is that few
engineering companies are into financing these days, particularly in emerging
nations.  However, what are your thoughts/suggestions?

Thanks, and Happy New Year!

Dan


Spoke w/ Skilling re OI "binary" decision. He is willing to enter into the
deal. His rational is that he thinks we will be ok on OWC in the final
analysis. He did  say to reserve for the deal adequately and structure it as
appropriate for the circumstances. He also wanted to know if there is
anything different here than on OWC. I told him that it wasn't significantly
different (both strong underlying businesses with huge event risk attached)

Lets get dash completed and then I will voice mail Jeff w/ specifics and get
his verbal signature.

Rick


Attached is the August 10, 2001 draft of the proposal to FERC regarding the
allocation methodology based on the latest comments from Lynn Miller.

As we discussed yesterday during the Official Committee conference call,
today I am circulating this draft to the Official Committee, the attorneys
for the Official Committee, the CalPX and the attorneys for the CalPX.  I
would like to receive all comments back from this group by Weds, August 15,
at which point I propose to circulate the draft to the Unofficial Energy
Sellers Group, and the Coral FERC litigation group that initiated the
proceedings that resulted in the April 6 order from FERC rescinding the
chargebacks issued by the CalPX through March 5.  PG&E also asked for an
advance opportunity to comment on the proposal, which we should consider
offering in light of PG&E's more cooperative approach.  I propose to allow
several days for comments from the broader distribution group, and propose
thereafter to file appropriate proceedings concurrently before FERC and the
CalPX bankruptcy court seeking approval of the proposal, as we have
discussed.  Approval from District Judge Moreno should  follow after the
bankruptcy court approval is obtained.

As soon as the Official Committee's attorneys have prepared drafts of the
moving papers that will be submitted to FERC and the bankruptcy court, we
will circulate copies to the members of the Official Committee for comments.

Please let me have your comments as soon as possible.  Thanks.

*CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE* The information contained in this e-mail message is
intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s)
named above. This message may be an attorney-client communication and as
such is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this
document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or
copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify the sender immediately via e-mail, and
delete the original message.

 - FERC Proposal  Weg rev Aug 10 01.DOC


>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Gail Glidewell
> Sent:	Thursday, September 13, 2001 2:03 PM
> To:	'dougs@senterracorp.com'
> Subject:	FW: FORUM II MEETING - OCTOBER 15TH
>
>
>
>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Gail Glidewell
> Sent:	Thursday, September 13, 2001 2:00 PM
> To:	'larryd@delpapabud.com'; 'mduffey@brecoholdings.com';
> 'sfordham@netversant.com'; 'blake@hoganinvestment.com';
> 'wvlarkin@travisintl.com'; 'smarnoy@ophouston.com';
> 'billymont@aol.com'; 'pmurphy@swbanktx.com';
> 'dougss@senterracorp.com'; 'jeff.skilling@enron.com';
> 'keith@gammaconst.com'
> Cc:	Michael S. Morgan; 'cheryl.sluder@delpapabud.com';
> 'robin@hoganinvestment.com'; 'jan_levin@travisintl.com';
> 'apuckett@ophouston.com'; 'dpipkin@swbanktx.com';
> 'missas@senterracorp.com'; 'sherri.sera@enron.com';
> 'gloria@gammaconst.com'
> Subject:	FORUM II MEETING - OCTOBER 15TH
>
> THE FORUM MEETING IS BACK ON!!!  Please mark your calendars for
> October 15th for the regular monthly meeting.  An e-mail will come out
> a week before for RSVP.
>
>
>
>
>
> Gail Glidewell
> Assistant to Michael Morgan
> 713-361-7205
> 713-361-7280 (Fax)
>


Yep I got it -- though I hear that the Senate and Assembly are supposed to
be in Session throughout the weekend so we may be able to grab him before
then but if not we know we have something set. Many thanks to you and Hedy
for setting the meeting.

See you tomorrow,
laney

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 1:11 PM
To: dhunter@s-k-w.com
Subject: Re: IMPORTANT MEETING TOMORROW

You got it.  I'll be there.  You get my voicemail on your cell phone?  re:
meeting with Brulte's on Monday, not tomorrow.

Best,
Jeff


Chris Germany
04/19/2000 09:06 AM
To: dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com @ ENRON, cdalpho@columbiaenergygroup.com,
jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com, mflewellyn@columbiaenergygroup.com, Kevin
Ruscitti/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Questions

Responses:
1.  I'll let Kevin answer this one.  ANR and Michcon are Central Desk pipes.

2.  I would prefer to address all items on Exhibit 1.  If possible I would
like to see the original Exhibit 1 volumes and updated Exhibit 1 volumes
through March 2001.  However, I don't remember buying back any baseload gas
on TCO for April.  I thought we priced everything at FOM IF and every day, we
are buying back gas at GD - $.01.

3.  Are you doing a buy sell with Erron at the same price?  Does Duke bill
CES directly for this?

4.  See attached worksheets.

5.  I don't know all the information on the local production yet.  The
pricing I'm currently using is the Exhibit 1 FOM deliverd pricing (pricing
using ENA transport).  The attached April file has a Local Production tab.
Molly Johnson is updating this information.  After she completes April, she
will recreate Jan - Mar.

6.   Since the delivered pricing on TCO is the same, I'm not concerned about
the individual citygate volumes.  For pricing purposes, I only care about
total daily deliveries.   It would be a problem if you were trying to take
additional gas from a non-constrained citygate to a constrained citygate and
you don't have enough capacity.  This holds true for most other pipelines as
well, Tenn Z6, CNG North Citygate, CNG South Citygate, ...  This would be a
better question for Charlie to ask me when he is looking for something
specific as it comes up.  The only thing I will not allow you to do is take
gas from one pipeline to the other, Texas Gas Z4 to CGAS, and Colleen has
discussed this with Melissa.

dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com on 04/18/2000 09:40:36 AM
To: " - *Chris.Germany@enron.com" <Chris.Germany@enron.com>
cc: " - *Dalphon, Charles" <cdalpho@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Porter,
Jeffrey" <jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Flewellyn, Melissa"
<mflewellyn@columbiaenergygroup.com>
Subject: Questions

Chris--Below is a list of questions that we need to address fairly quickly.
Please look it over and let's talk.  The items are not prioritized in any way.

1-Enron's invoices show that for deliveries to Muncie (Indiana Gas) off ANR
the
price index used is Michcon.citygate.GD.M.I.   The same is true for delivery
points into Michcon.   Is this correct, or are you actually using ANR ML-7
plus
the Exhibit 1 increment applicable to Michcon?   Exhibit 1 specifies ANR ML-7
as the price index for Michcon.

2-CES has completely exited the following market areas/zones as of April 1:
TCO 6-11, TCO 6-12.   However, because Exhibit 1 contains projected volumes
for
these two market areas in April 00, CES had to purchase from and resell to
Enron 90% of the April volumes contained in Exhibit 1.  Exhibit 1 contains
projected volumes for both market areas thru October 2000.   Are we required
to
do a purchase/sell-back in each of these future months, or can we dispense
with
this?  I refer you to Section 3.6 of the Gas Supply Assignment and Agency
Agreement (p. 11-12) as having some bearing on this issue.

3-The monthly volumes in Exhibit 1 off Iroquios into Central Hudson are
incorrect.  The 4,200 Dth is a monthly volume, not a Dth/day volume.  Since
the
supply for this point is already arranged as a back-to-back with Duke Energy
and since Duke appears to be billing us directly for this gas, I do not intend
to do a simultaneous "buy/sell"  with Enron of the volumes in excess of the
(erroneous) Exhibit 1 volume.  If you disagree, let's discuss.

4-According to Exhibit 1, CES gets monthly capacity releases for TCO 4-21
(O&R),  TCO 7-3 (West Ohio), TGP Zone 6 (Boston Gas?), would you please
provide
me with the Dth of capacity released to Enron as CES's agent on a monthly
basis
for April at each of these points?   (I also need these numbers for January,
February, and March.)

5-How is the local production behind NYSEG, NFGD-PA, and CPA priced?

6-How will Enron invoice CES for daily swings on TCO in situations where gas
was merely being re-directed from one delivery point (where we were long for
that day) to another delivery point (where we were short)?

There will undoubtedly be other questions.  I will direct them to you as they
arise.

Thanks.

Doug Kinney
Ph:  703-561-6339
Fax:  703-561-7317


Judge denies television coverage of terror suspect Zacarias Moussaoui's trial.

http://www.abcnews.go.com

ABCNEWS.com:  Up to the Moment, Up to You (tm)
http://abcnews.go.com
---
You received this mail because you subscribed via ABCNEWS.com. If you would like to stop receiving these mailings, log into our mailcenter at http://login.mailpref.go.com/unsubscribe .

Please do not respond to this mail. Questions or comments can be submitted at
http://abcnews.go.com/service/help/abccontact.html


Dear Customer:

Here is your RateWatch subscription from iOwn.com.

Need a real estate agent? Compare selling proposals from
local realtors. See agents' performance history,
qualifications and fees.  All at HomeGain.
http://track.wommera.com/servlet/re?id=10109091001&sid=55221

************************************************************

These current mortgage rates are based on the loan and
property information you provided us.

Loan Type:    30 Year Fixed
State:        TX

 Interest  Points/   Closing            Monthly
 Rate      (Rebate)   Costs     APR     Payment    Lender
------------------------------------------------------------------
  6.750%  2.250    $4,478    7.109%   $649      MortgageSelect
  7.000%  2.625    $4,236    7.342%   $665      Quicken Loans
------------------------------------------------------------------

************************************************************
To apply for a loan through iOwn, please go to
http://track.wommera.com/servlet/re?id=9428848011&sid=55221

***********************************************************

Rates are current as of 12-Dec-00, but aren't guaranteed
until you submit an application and the rate is officially
locked.

Closing costs are estimated non-recurring costs, including
any rebate.  They do not include prepaid recurring fees.

************************************************************

pkeavey@ect.enron.com:
To change your settings or to unsubscribe, please go to
http://track.wommera.com/servlet/re?id=15016162101&sid=55221

************************************************************

If you have any questions or comments, please email our
customer service department at loans@iown.com

************************************************************

As your needs change, you can edit your Personal Profile to
get the most out of your tips. Just go to:
http://track.wommera.com/servlet/re?id=13166457691&sid=55221


This is the latest and greatest from centana. Are you ok with this,  will you review?

-----Original Message-----
From: Greg A. Swidensky [mailto:gaswidensky@duke-energy.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:30 PM
To: Parks, Joe
Subject: CIPCO Storage Letter Agreement

i think this is the latest so lets work off this....i will call after i
talk with legal
----- Forwarded by Greg A. Swidensky/Houston/PEFS/PEC on 03/26/02 02:29 PM
-----

                    Michael S.
                    Richards             To:     sproctor@akllp.com
                                         cc:     Greg A. Swidensky/Houston/PEFS/PEC@PEC, kamclendon@stblaw.com
                    03/13/02 02:49       Subject:     CIPCO Storage Letter Agreement
                    PM

Shemin, attached below is your last draft of the letter agreement with our
additional comments.  Some of the comments we previously discussed on the
phone.  I understand my business person is having discussions with Enron
management to try and resolve a number of issues with Enron.  Therefore,
the results of those discussions may cause additional comments from us to
this Letter Agreement..  In addition, my business person is currently out
of the office, so these comments are subject to his review and additional
changes.  We are fine with the Escrow Agreement as long as it is understood
that Enron will pay all costs associated with the Escrow Agreement.

(See attached file: StorageLeaseLetterAgreement3-13-02.DOC)


Kim,

As promised, here are all the files I have on California entities' gas
assets/contracts.  I have summarized what they are below.  Some of the data
is old; however, I think most of it largely reflects current usage, etc.....

1.  GS_ACCRD:  Palo Alto gas load summary.
2,  SMUD Assets & Load
3.  CA-Power-Plants:  summary of all generation assets in California
4   DWP Gas Assets:  Summary of gas Transport Assets & Contracts
5.  gas consumption:  LADWP historical gas use
6.  Gas Fired Resources:   LADWP's Asset Summary
7.  Glendale Loads..:  Generation Asset Summary
8.  LOADPROF:  City of Long Beach Historical Load Data
9.  Prepay:  Summary of Quantities & Physical Delivery Premiums
10.  Santa Clara's Generation Asset Summary
11.  Usage History:  1998 Pasadena Gas Data

Laird


Quick Inspirations 	 [IMAGE]  Home   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]

[IMAGE] 	[IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   Your inspirational quote for the day:  [IMAGE]      Treasures   [IMAGE]  There are treasures in life,   but owners are few   Of money and power   to buy things brand new.    Yet you can be wealthy   and feel regal too,   If you will just look   for the treasures in you.    [IMAGE]  These treasures in life   are not hard to find   When you look in your heart,   your soul, and your mind.    For when you are willing   to share what's within,   Your fervent search   for riches will end.    [IMAGE]  The joy and the laughter,   the smile that you bring;   The heart unafraid   to love and to sing;    The hand always willing   to help those in need;   Ones quick to reach out,   to labor and fee.    [IMAGE]  So thank you for sharing   these great gifts inside;   The caring, the cheering,   the hug when one cried.    Thanks for the energy,   encouragement too,   And thank you for sharing   the treasures in you.     [IMAGE]     [IMAGE] Check out our other inspirational content: [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  You [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  Stood Beside [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  Better Place [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] Visit QuickInspirations.com  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]    To unsubscribe from the Quick Inspirations newsletter simply click here    You received this email because you opted to receive the Quick Inspirations Newsletter through one of our valued partners.  If you believe you received this message in error or would no longer like to receive quick inspirations please follow the unsubscription instructions at the bottom of this email.  If you have any questions please email qi-help@quickinspirations.com  and a customer service representative will assist you    [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  	[IMAGE]

		[IMAGE]
[IMAGE] 	Quick Inspirations is Copyright ? 2001. All rights reserved.  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] 	[IMAGE]


Dear Kenneth,
As more and more companies move core business activities to the internet,
security is becoming the number one obstacle.  The market today is turning
towards Public Key Infrastructure as the solution.  Xcert announces a free
"Practical Guide to Public Key Infrastructure."  You can pick up your  free
copy at the URL listed below:
http://www.xcert.com/corp/Contact_Us/pkiguide_default.html
We hope it shows you about how PKI and Xcert can help you build trust with
your customers and partners on the Internet.

Based in Walnut Creek, California, Xcert International is the premier
developer of Internet based public key infrastructure (PKI) technology.
Xcerts solutions provide the ultimate Internet Security structure by going
beyond existing security models such as firewalls, encryption and anti-virus
software. Xcert's products provide privacy and authenticity for conducting
secure Internet transactions and information sharing. Xcert develops,
manufactures and distributes Certificate Authority (CA) and PKI solutions
that use secure directory services to provide organizations and individuals
with a secure and non-repudiable method of communicating and trading with
each other over the Internet. We work with end-customers, integrators, and
certificate service providers who are looking for a truly scalable,
open-standards based, interoperable PKI solution that works over standard
protocols.

We invite you to contact us at 800-721-9191 to learn what more Xcert
International can do for you with internet PKI solutions.

Sincerely,

Inside Sales
800-721-9191
www.xcert.com
lcoldwater-slx@xcert.com


Expedia.com
Home Page
[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]

		[IMAGE]

		[IMAGE]
		Special Offer from Expedia.com

[IMAGE]

OPTIONS

[IMAGE]

Go to Expedia.com

[IMAGE]

		 Dear Expedia.com Traveler,

		Announcing a limited-time offer on Northwest Airlines from Expedia.comc.

		If you book a Northwest flight on Expedia.com between now and September 29,
2000, you could get an immediate 10% discount.*  That,s because Expedia.com
is offering this limited-time discount on select Northwest flights that
depart from or arrive at 23 select cities within the contiguous 48 United
States.

		So if you,re considering a trip, make sure you check out Expedia.com and
Northwest Airlines, and do it now*this offer expires soon!

		Remember, the last day you can purchase your ticket and reap the 10% savings
is September 29, 2000. But your travel can take place anytime between
September 19 and December 14, 2000.  So don,t let this offer get away.

		Just click this link to see if your cities qualify and find out more details
to help plan your trip. Then all you have to do is pack your bags and pocket
the savings!

		Expedia.com Travel Team
		Don't just travel. Travel Right.

		P.S. This offer is available to everyone.  So be sure to forward this e-mail
to anyone you think might like to get away and save money at the same time!

		*10% discount available on select fares booked from 12:01 AM September 12,
through 11:59 PM September 29, 2000, for travel September 19-December 14,
2000. Saturday-night stay and 7 days advance purchase required. Maximum stay:
30 days. Blackout dates: November 22 and 26, 2000. Subject to availability.
Individual fare rules and other restrictions may apply. Not all Northwest
destinations are available with this offer. Ticket purchases made on
Expedia.com using the Flight Price Matcher service do not qualify for this
offer.

		About this mailing: You are receiving this e-mail because you are a
registered member of Expedia.com c.  Your Expedia c membership is free and
your privacy and credit card security are guaranteed.  If you have other
questions, visit the Expedia.com Service Center.

		If you do not wish to receive any further promotional e-mails from us, please
reply to this mail with "unsubscribe" in the subject line. Forget your user
name or password? Click here.

		We're sorry, but we cannot reply to responses to this e-mail.  If you'd like
to give us feedback, click here.

		,2000 Expedia, Inc. Expedia, Expedia.com, the Airplane logo, and "Don't just
travel. Travel Right." are either registered trademarks or trademarks of
Expedia, Inc. in the United States and/or other countries. All rights
reserved. Other company and product names mentioned herein may be trademarks
of their respective owners. Expedia terms of use.

		This email was sent to:  mark.taylor@enron.com


There may be a business opportunity with this company, but I would not advise
making an investment.
Kevin Garland

	Richard Reichardt
	10/10/00 12:30 PM

		 To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Larry Lawyer/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Tom Gros/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin
Garland/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Richard DiMichele/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Ken Rice/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications
		 Subject: Seismic Data on Oil & Gas field Development via Satellite

Mike,

Using NASA satellite transmission of maritime data and establishing a Houston
Data Center to consolidate and centrally process 3D seismic data surveys for
oil and gas extraction, exploration and development could save the petroleum
industry more than $300 million dollars annually through reduced operational
expenses.  Added value in shortening the time to process and deliver the
finished surveys should generate more than $26 million per site (based upon
$15/barrel for average oil well production to market 30 days sooner)in
revenue.  By re-selling this data to market analysts or by internally using
this data for forecasting future oil/gas production Enron could increase the
accuracy of forecasting reserves and production capabilities globally.  By
holding the data as exclusive (or partially exclusive), Enron would have a
significant market advantage in futures pricing for oil and gas.(Vince's team
is quantifying the valuation of this information)

Attached please find an updated version of the business case for seismic data
transfer via satellite, by a geophysicist at SpaceData - William K. Aylor,
calculated using $22/barrel oil.

Based upon your availability, Jon Adler and I would like to make a
presentation to you (or your designated representative) on the Enron
potential of this opportunity, sometime next week (17-20 October).

 - SDT Business Case4.pdf

V.R.,

Richard Reichardt
Enron Broadband Services
(713)-345-8377 (Office)
(713)-907-3767 (Mobile)
1400 Smith Street, Suite EB 4364
Houston, Texas  77002


Works for me.  Thanks.

Erica Braden
07/22/99 08:36 AM
To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Reviews

You're on the schedule for 4:00 p.m.   Please let me know if this works.
Thanks!

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Gerald Nemec                           07/21/99 06:30 PM

To: Erica Braden/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Reviews

Tommorrow at 2:00 or later works for me.  Thanks

Erica Braden
07/21/99 12:46 PM
To: Peggy Banczak/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandi M Braband/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shonnie Daniel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shawna Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen W Van
Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ann Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Ogden/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Robert Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Erica Braden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Radford/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Becky Tlucek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wende Warren/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberlee A
Bennick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Taffy Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Reviews

Barbara would like to conduct reviews on Thursday and Friday of this week.
Please e-mail me at your earliest convenience to let me know what time I can
schedule your review.  Reviews will be conducted during the hours of 9:30 -
4:30 and will last approximately 30 minutes each.

Thanks, E.


Fred,  I forwarded you the notice prepared by Global Finance.  It requires
essentially the same information.

Kay

Fred Mitro@ECT
01/02/2001 06:22 PM
To: Chris Booth/NA/Enron@Enron, Rebecca Walker/NA/Enron@Enron, Kay
Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Intergen - Bill of Sale Schedule

Ben has asked me to prepare a draft Bill of Sale - Equipment schedule to
support the closing of the Intergen transaction.

I have generated the attached spread sheet showing the following information
for the two LM6000 turbines and the one ABB transformer:

 Unit Description (Column A)
 Unit Number (Column B)
 Unit Serial # (Column C)
 Unit Delivery Date (Column D)
 Physical location of the units as of the date of schedule (1/5/01) (Column E)
 The equipment and all rights provided to Buyer under Agreement dated ____
(Column F)

I have filled in descriptions for each piece of equipment (Column A).  I need
help with the following:

Chris:  Please fill in Columns B, C, D & E with current information from our
equipment contracts.

Rebecca:  Please obtain the information for Columns A, B, C, D, E, & F  from
Catherine in Global Finance.  This should be the information that was
recorded in the TurboPark financing documents when the equipment option
agreements were moved into TurboPark from West LB.

Kay:  Please fill in the dates for Column F and let me know if any additional
information is required to complete this schedule.

Please forward me a revised copy of this spreadsheet once you have completed
the relevant information.  I welcome your input on the information contained
within this schedule.

Our goal here is to create a schedule which is factually correct (based on
all of the relevant agreements) and does not create any
inconsistencies/conflicts with the TurboPark documents.  We need to deliver a
draft of this schedule to the TurboPark banks tomorrow  for their review.
This schedule represents one of four documents required to effect a smooth
transfer of the relevant equipment interests from TurboPark into the
respective CA Development entity and close this transaction prior to the
1/15/01 deadline.

Call me to discuss any of this information.

Fred


Yvette,

Where is this offsite taking place?  I know you told in the meeting the other
day, but I didn't write it down.

D


I will be on vacation Tuesday, November 20 through Monday, November 26.  I will be back in the
	office on Tuesday, November 27th.  John and Terry are in the office all week and Terry is on
	call for the holiday weekend for scheduling issues.

	Terry and Steve can get a hold of me over the holidays if needed.

	For accounting issues, Raetta and Larry will be in the office Tuesday and Wednesday, with Raetta
	taking a half day vacation on Wednesday.

	All of you have a great Thanksgiving with your families.  I look forward to seeing you next Tuesday.

	Thanks. Lynn


Sorry, I read the other email first--you guys have me covered quite well.  I think the staff meeting formerly known as Mikes is on Tuesday Mar. 3, right Emily??  I didn't have anything on my calendar on the 12th.  Emily, you might want to send an email around reminding everyone of the Mar. 3 all-lawyers meeting and the secretary meeting just in case some people are assuming I'll schedule mine at different times.  Thanks all.

From:	Louis Soldano/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/30/2001 10:01 AM
To:	Dorothy McCoppin/ENRON@enronXgate, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:	Emily Sellers/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject:	RE: Mon morning pre-ETS staff meetings

Drew - I have you covered for the 12th.

Em - you might cancel the Mike Moran staff meeting for 11:00 on the 12th.  I'd cover for Drew but, if I were him, I would not let me conduct his first official staff mtg with the lawyers....especially if Dot is anot availble to keep me in line..

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	McCoppin, Dorothy
Sent:	Friday, March 30, 2001 10:36 AM
To:	Fossum, Drew; Soldano, Louis
Cc:	Sellers, Emily
Subject:	RE: Mon morning pre-ETS staff meetings
Importance:	High

	Drew-

	Staff meeting on Monday the 9th -- no problem.  I would be glad to cover the Derrick meeting on April 12; however,
	I have jury duty that day (yuck)!

	--Dot

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Fossum, Drew
Sent:	Friday, March 30, 2001 8:40 AM
To:	McCoppin, Dorothy; Soldano, Louis
Cc:	Sellers, Emily
Subject:	Re: Mon morning pre-ETS staff meetings

Yes, lets continue to have the pre-meetings formerly known as Mike's every Mon. at 8:30 (pls put on my calendar Emily).
I'll be in Houston this Monday so just come to my office at 8:30 if you are both here.  Dot, pls cover the staff meeting on
Monday, April 9 as I'll be on vacation.  Also, pls cover the Derrick large GC meeting at 9:00 am on April 12 as I'll be at NN's Keyex meeting in Cal.  (I may be able to call in to this but would like you to cover anyway in case something goes haywire). Thanks df

From:	Dorothy McCoppin/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/29/2001 04:39 PM
To:	Emily Sellers/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:	Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject:	Mon morning pre-ETS staff meetings

	If Mike has "checked out", will he then not be here on Monday at 8:30 for pre-Stan meeting, or what?  Should I just
	call Drew?   When?


Thanks a bunch.


Could you coordinate with Cindy Stark on the meeting with Massey in a couple
of weeks?  Stan has asked me if I would like to attend.  I would, but don't
know when exactly it is scheduled for.
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 04/30/2001
07:41 AM ---------------------------

Stanley Horton
04/26/2001 04:53 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Shelley Corman/Enron@EnronXGate, Linda
Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Ray Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tom
Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Some Background on California Gas Price Spikes--The Other Side
of the Story

I agree.  I suggest the following.  Joe, we need you to go give a pitch to
Massey's assistats about what is going on.  Next Jerry Halvorsen has
scheduled a lunch with Massey in two weeks.  He has invited me to attend.
What do you think?

Steven J Kean
04/26/2001 03:09 PM
To: Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Shelley Corman/Enron@EnronXGate
cc: Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Ray
Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Some Background on California Gas Price Spikes--The Other Side of
the Story

We need to communicate with Massey before he gets completely carried away
blaming the interstate pipeline business for gas price spikes.  We need to
get him the information regarding Cal LDCs failure to fill storage and their
opposition to additional pipeline construction in the state.  Shelley --
could you forward copies of the LDC filings to the group.  Should Joe or I
(or both) try to see massey when I am in town next week?
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 04/26/2001
02:07 PM ---------------------------
From: Jeff Dasovich on 04/24/2001 06:57 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, skean@enron.com, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Leslie
Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rob
Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enro@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Some Background on California Gas Price Spikes--The Other Side of
the Story

Last week, I distributed a presentation that the Brattle Group gave before
the California Inquisition (i.e., legislative gas oversight committee looking
into the gas price spikes at the Cal border).

The Brattle Group is a consulting firm that Edison has long used to beat up
on SoCalGas (recall that Edison used to be a big gas customer when it owned
power plants).  Edison "arranged" for the Brattle Group to be the star
witness at the Cal Leg gas hearing.  Their job was to set up El Paso and
Dynegy for the hit at hearings that took place the following day.  Their
message was simple (and simplistic):

El Paso and Dynegy have market power.
They have used the market power to drive up basis and thus the price of gas
at the border (to "obscene" levels).
That, in turn, has driven up electricity prices.

Ken Lay is giving a gas talk tomorrow, and Rob Bradley asked that I provide
the alternative view to the Edison/Brattle rant, in the event that he gets
any questions on the topic.  It's attached.  Apologies, it's quick and dirty,
but it provides the basics.

Obviously no need for us to defend El Paso or Dynegy, but might be useful to
offer a more rationale explanation than the one that the California
Legislature is peddling.

Finally, we were also fingered somewhat as culprits at the hearing (the
California PUC FERC lawyer claimed that ENA and TW colluded to drive up basis
when ENA controlled a portion of  the capacity), but the overriding goal of
the hearing was to go after EP and Dynegy.

Best,
Jeff


This path just looks like it will be cut........... please take a moment to
look at it.

Also,

It is very important that you document when you cannot Reach Morgan Stanley's
real time.  An e-mail will do, send it to me.