How about 9:30 or 10??MK

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rapp, Bill
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 5:12 PM
To:	Pavlou, Maria; Miller, Mary Kay
Cc:	Kilmer III, Robert; Porter, Gregory J.; 'fkelly@gbmdc.com'; McConnell, Mark; Harris, Steven; Kirk, Steve
Subject:	RE: answer to cpuc protest

What's a good time for everyone? I'm open in the morning.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Pavlou, Maria
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 4:55 PM
To:	Miller, Mary Kay; Rapp, Bill
Cc:	Kilmer III, Robert; Porter, Gregory J.; 'fkelly@gbmdc.com'; McConnell, Mark; Harris, Steven; Kirk, Steve
Subject:	RE: answer to cpuc protest

I think we could wind this up with a quick conference call tomorrow a.m.  Greg and I had some additional thoughts on how to handle the issue that this contract is not for 40% of primary capacity - it is not like an El Paso/Dynegy, Enron or El Paso deal without necessarily getting into the alternate issue of sham transactions.  Also, Kathy R. checked and as of today, IS have not filed a protest.  Maria

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Miller, Mary Kay
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 3:13 PM
To:	Pavlou, Maria; Rapp, Bill
Cc:	Kilmer III, Robert; Porter, Gregory J.; 'fkelly@gbmdc.com'; McConnell, Mark; Harris, Steven; Kirk, Steve
Subject:	RE: answer to cpuc protest

 Attached are some addtional comments and questions in regard to this answer.  MK

 << File: RP97-288cpucmk.doc >>

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Pavlou, Maria
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 11:18 AM
To:	Rapp, Bill
Cc:	Kilmer III, Robert; Porter, Gregory J.; Miller, Mary Kay; 'fkelly@gbmdc.com'; McConnell, Mark; Harris, Steven
Subject:	answer to cpuc protest

Bill, attached are a few comments/questions on your proposed draft answer, which I thought was excellent.  We might want to discuss some of these questions with the ccs.  Thanks, Maria

 << File: RP97-288cpuc.doc >>


FYI, Jim asked that I drop you a note with regard to a proposed LNG project
being developed by Global Markets.  I have provided some technical support
with respect to some onshore storage tariff issues.

The project consists of converting an oil tanker into a floating vaporization
facility, anchoring it off the coast of California and constructing a subsea
pipeline to bring the gas onshore.  The facility would have a daily unloading
rate of 500,000 mmbtu/d, taking approximately 6-7 days to fully unload a
cargo.  Approximately 172,000 mmbtu/d would go directly to market, with the
remainder being injected into utility storage facilities for ultimate
withdrawal prior to arrival of a new shipment of LNG (roughly 11 days).  The
goal is to baseload a market of 172,000 mmbtu/d.

The project would have a start-up date in early 2003.  While other proposals
are being considered to bring LNG into California, the Enron proposal is
unique in that it is considering onshore gas storage vs offshore LNG
storage.  Retrofitting the oil tanker takes approximately 18 months.
Constructing an offshore LNG storage facility would take 3 years -  providing
Enron a competitive advantage with respect to timing.   To protect this
competitive advantage during the development stage of the project, it has
been requested that this particular aspect  be kept confidential.

Lisa Yoho is working directly with Kurt Lindahl, the project manager.


John and Louise						,

I hope that the sample agreements sent to John earlier were what you had in mind.

I have completed all of the amendment and assignment agreements for those persons with the guaranteed bonus.  I will hold on to them until you are ready to fill in the blanks.  A few of those employees work for Enron Canada Corp.  I am not sure if I can transfer them to the other company in light of tax issues.  Nonetheless, those are ready, and we can change the new company name if we set up a Canadian entity in the next few days.

Let me know if you would like any more information.  You can reach me at 3-6401 or on my cell at 713-302-5522.

Michelle


what do you want for one of your 3rd round picks?


Enclosed is the copy of the TP list with the updated fields we would like to have completed.  Let's meet today around 3:00 if possible to fill in the commercial leads.  It is also located at M:\Eprojects\UBS_Start_Up\Pwr_Impl_Plan

Debra


Ken::

Attached is the draft agenda and participant list for Davos.

Our Europe government affairs group felt that it would be best if you spoke
on energy liberalization and globalization with gas and electricity rather
than one of the other topics since it has more direct implications for our
profit centers.  If you would rather switch to another panel after you look
at the agenda, please do so and let me know.

(Rosie--can you confirm everything with Silvia?)

- Rob

---------------------- Forwarded by Doug Wood/LON/ECT on 27/11/2000 17:56
---------------------------
To: doug.wood@enron.com, Rosalee.Fleming@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Preliminary Programme - Energy Governors

Dear Doug, dear Rosalee,

Please find attached the preliminary programme for the Energy Governors
Meeting.  The programme is based on the discussions held during the
preparatory meeting last month.  We were delighted that Enron was
represented.  Thanks for all you input Doug!  For you information, I have
also attached the list of confirmed participants to date.

Doug, based on your last e-mail, we would like to invite Dr Lay to speak in
the session "Globalization and Liberalization" on Monday afternoon.  Please
let me know if you agree and if either you or Rosalee could check with him
to see if he is of the same opinion and if he accepts, I would greatly
appreciate this.  Or let me know if he would prefer to speak in another
session.

Rosalee, we have Dr Lay already confirmed for two sessions within the main
Annual Meeting programme, the B-2-B session and "The shape of the 21st
Century Corporation"  as soon as I know the exact dates and times - I will
let you know immediately in order to re-confirm.

(See attached file: regengov.doc)(See attached file: 2001progexternal.doc)

All the best and thanks,
Silvia Graf Jilinski
Community Manager - Energy and Institutionals
World Economic Forum
Direct tel: 41 22 869 1222
Fax: 41 22 786 2744
E-mail: Silvia.GrafJilinski@weforum.org
 - regengov.doc
 - 2001progexternal.doc


<<CALPINE DAILY GAS NOMINATION 1.doc>>

RICKY A. ARCHER
Fuel Supply
700 Louisiana, Suite 2700
Houston, Texas 77002
713-830-8659 direct
713-830-8722 fax

 - CALPINE DAILY GAS NOMINATION 1.doc


I got a hold of Southern finally, and Mark Watts is out until Monday. The
assistant who I spoke to knew pretty much nothing about this, so he said he
couldn't verify whether or not they would be willing to ADP the deal. But
according to our traders, they spoke with Mark Watts yesterday afternoon, and
he agreed to ADP the December futures deal.

If this still seems to be a problem, please let me know. Otherwise I'll plan
on talking to Watts on Monday.

Thanks,
Kate

Melissa Ann Murphy
12/06/2000 06:17 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Southern Contact

Hi Kate, the person at Southern that called Joe Hunter is Mark Watts.  His
phone number is (678) 579-3470.  He may be a trader.

Let me know if you need anything else.

Thanks,
Melissa
(713) 853-1886


I would like two.

Thank You,
Holden

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mehrer, Anna
Sent:	Wednesday, September 26, 2001 12:02 PM
To:	Alonso, Tom; Alport, Kysa; Anderson, Robert; Axford, Kathy; Badeer, Robert; Belden, Tim; Blair, Kit; Butler, Emily; Chatterton, Jill; Choi, Paul; Cocke Jr., Stanley; Crandall, Sean; Cutsforth, Diane; Dean, Craig; Davidson, Debra; Driscoll, Michael M.; Emmert, Caroline; Fischer, Mark; Foster, Chris H.; Freeman, Scott; Gang, Lisa; Guzman, Mark; Hall, Erin; Harasin, Leaf; Heizenrader, Tim; Lee, Eugene; Linder, Eric; Mallory, Chris; Malowney, John; Merriss, Steven; Meyers, Bert; Motley, Matt; Nelson, Kourtney; O'Neil, Murray P.; Platter, Phillip; Porter, David V.; Purcell, Mike; Rawson, Lester; Reyes, Jim; Richter, Jeff; Robinson, Donald; Rosman, Stewart; Runswick, Stacy; Salisbury, Holden; Sarnowski, Julie; Scholtes, Diana; Semperger, Cara; Sheppard, Kathryn; Stokley, Chris; Swain, Steve; Swerzbin, Mike; Symes, Kate; Thompson, Virginia; Van houten, Maria; Williams III, Bill; Sheidun, Donna; DL-Portland Real Time Shift
Subject:	Timbers Playoffs Thursday (Tomorrow) at 7 pm

 << OLE Object: Microsoft ClipArt Gallery >>

Please e-mail me your interest in obtaining tickets for the suite for tomorrow's playoffs game at PGE Park.

Thanks,
Anna


This request has been pending your approval for  12 days.  Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000078756&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000078756
Request Create Date : 12/7/01 5:27:01 PM
Requested For       : michelle.blaine@enron.com
Resource Name       : eConnect - VPN  Tier 2 - Full Access
Resource Type       : Applications


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"publications@enerdata.com" <publications@enerdata.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22publications+40enerdata+2Ecom+22+20+3Cpublications+40enerdata+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, August 02, 2001 12:40 PM
To:	undisclosed-recipients:;@ENRON
Subject:	August 2001 CGPR

 - cgprAug01.pdf


Good.  I'm ready to get at least one thing off the "to do" list.

Kay

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Mitch Robinson                           12/13/2000 08:07 AM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: FW: Letter agreement

Stamp of approval.  Mike J. Miller is the right guy from ENA to sign.  Please
let me know if you have any trouble getting a signature from any of the
parties.

Thanks,

Mitch
---------------------- Forwarded by Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron on 12/13/2000
08:06 AM ---------------------------

DeKrey Lynn <Lynn.DeKrey@swpc.siemens.com> on 12/12/2000 04:58:08 PM
To: "Mitch Robinson (E-mail)" <Mitch.Robinson@enron.com>
cc: Monahan Bill <Bill.Monahan@swpc.siemens.com>

Subject: FW: Letter agreement

Mitch
This is acceptable, please submit

Lynn DeKrey

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2000 5:05 PM
To: lynn.dekrey@swpc.siemens.com
Subject: Letter agreement

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/10/2000 04:08
PM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
12/10/2000 04:03 PM

To:   Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron, lynn@dekrey@swpc.siemens.com, Ross
      Newlin/HOU/EES@EES
cc:

Subject:  Letter agreement

Gentlemen,

I've revised paragraph 5 to reflect our discussion.  Also, I made a change
to paragraph 7 to include technical bulletins per Mitch's request which we
did not discuss on our call.

(See attached file: WestinghouseProposal to Resolve Issues on Enron - Dec10
SWPC.doc)

Please let me know if you have any questions or comments.

Kay

713 345 7566

 - WestinghouseProposal to Resolve Issues on Enron - Dec10 SWPC.doc


just finished give-up with UBS, so we are ready to execute
can you guys tell if you need phone numbers for the pits and i can order
directs too

i will be there in Hosuton tomorrow & friday, can i come by without
aggravating too many peope

let me know
heff

FORE !!,, don't be standing to the side of me, i haven't hit a ball since
sept 9th


Here is DGS Reply Brief.

 - replybrief2.wpd


-----Original Message-----
From: Rhonda_Morris@QuorumHealthResources.com
[mailto:Rhonda_Morris@QuorumHealthResources.com]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 1:08 PM
To: MHA_Graduate_Programs@triadhospitalsinc.com
Cc: Larry_Bolton@QuorumHealthResources.com;
Steve_Shores@QuorumHealthResources.com
Subject: CEO Job Opportunity for Memorial Hospital in Siloam Springs,
Arkansas (73 Beds)

Attached is a Quorum job opportunity for CEO with Memorial Hospital in
Siloam Springs, Arkansas (73 Beds).

I have attached the opportunity in two different formats.  You may use the
one appropriate for your software.  If you have any difficulty opening
these files please let me know.  Thank you.

(See attached file: Jo-ceomh.doc)        (See attached file: Jo-ceomh.wpd)

 - Jo-ceomh.doc
 - Jo-ceomh.wpd


Editorial/Opinion

Making it hot for deregulation
Gregory Palast
The New York Times

08/29/2000
The News & Observer Raleigh, NC

Final
A11
(Copyright 2000)

PECONIC, N.Y. -- While reporters ogled celebrities at Barbra Streisand's
bungalow during the Democratic Convention in Los Angeles, something important
was being debated 100 miles to the south in San Diego, where there was a real
display of populism. There politicians have enrolled 2 million citizens in a
scary economic experiment. This year, San Diego became the first city in
California to experience the end of state regulation of electricity prices.
When California's lawmakers voted to bring the miracle of market competition
to electricity, they wrote into the law that homeowners' bills would fall "by
at least 20 percent." In fact, bills jumped 124 percent this August over
last. Rather than repudiate this mad market experiment, the federal
government and 24 other states have rushed to imitate California's lead.

Actually, Californians were lucky. Every hour of every day, San Diego Gas and
Electric, the local utility, must now buy its electricity at a state auction
known as a power pool. On the first hot day this summer, during the noonday
heat, the companies that produce the power, newly deregulated, cranked up
their bids to $9,999 per megawatt hour. That's about 5,000 percent more than
the once- controlled price of $20, but it could have been worse.
According to those inside the secretive auction agency, sellers assumed the
pool's computers could handle only four-digit bids. In fact, the computers
could have accepted bids for seven figures and bankrupted a chunk of the
state in a day.
One can trace California's electricity market plague largely to a single
source, Daniel Fessler. In the early 1990s, Fessler, then president of the
state's Public Utilities Commission, developed an infatuation with one of
Margaret Thatcher's free-market ventures: the troubled England-Wales Power
Pool.
How strange. Britons pay about 70 percent more for electricity than
Americans. That's hardly a surprise, as each day around tea time, when
England's usage peaks, a small clique of power plant owners take over the
electricity auction, bidding up prices by 200 percent to 2,000 percent.
In the United States, utilities vowed they would play no such tricks if
California removed the limits on profits that have been at the core of
regulation policy for the past 100 years. The promise lasted several months,
during which time five giant international electricity sellers - all new to
California - imported the techniques they'd learned in Britain that were
designed to manipulate the bidding process and in a single month produce
profits once permitted for an entire year.
The deregulation bug is now winging eastward. New York City, for example, has
reportedly succumbed to 43 percent increases in Con Edison bills.
But in San Diego, something extraordinary happened. This month, thousands
joined an unprecedented consumers' boycott. The power companies can send out
their bloated bills, but the tanned masses won't pay. Refuseniks include the
Council of Churches, the school district and - without a hint of shame -
Steve Peace, the state senator who sponsored the deregulation law.
* * *
The electricity fiasco should be a godsend for Al Gore's campaign. After all,
it was Fessler and his fellow Republicans who threw California's consumers to
the meager mercies of the marketplace. And Gov. George W. Bush pushed through
deregulation in Texas, which is widely expected produce hefty returns for a
former business partner, Sam Wyly, owner of the GreenMountain, a power
seller.
But while Gore spoke out in Los Angeles against "powerful forces," on this
subject he's mum. No wonder: the Clinton-Gore administration still promotes
California-style deregulation as a model for the nation.
But someone's ready to feel California's pain, and it's not good news for
Gore. During the Democrats' big show, Ralph Nader went to San Diego to remind
boycotters that he was founding father of the Utility Consumer Action
Network, the 46,000-member local group leading the anti-corporate uprising.
Electricity is the first big U.S. industry formerly under the tight control
of states to be opened up to international operators and their free market
rules. For the first time, Americans feel the bite of real globalization, and
we don't like it one bit.


Greetings from EDGAR Online!

How's your Free Trial of EDGAR Online going? Or did forget you registered,
since you were just interested in getting at that one filing you needed a few days ago?

Did you know you could be receiving an email alert as soon as that company files
again? It's not just 10-Ks and Quarterly Reports. Every company has to file with the
SEC all the time, not just once a year. You may have already missed their latest
announcement.

Plus, you can get real-time email alerts on new filings by not just company name or
ticker symbol; My EDGAR Online allows you to track by industry, region, or specific
filing type, including unscheduled material events and shareholder announcements.

Stop searching and let My EDGAR Online look for new filings FOR you. Go to http://www.edgar-online.com/watchlist.asp/ and set up your portfolio now.

TAKE EDGAR ONLINE TO THE BEACH
Why not? As a subscriber, you can download and print any document to take with you anywhere: the train, the couch, even the sand. Why stare at a screen in the office when
you can review filings at your convenience? And don't print the entire document -
select just the pages or sections you need.

FREE ANNUAL REPORTS, TOO
You can get hard copy Annual Reports from over 3,000 participating company delivered
to your home or office, FREE. Go to http://edgar-online.ar.wilink.com/cgi-bin/start.pl
or click on the Annual Reports link in the More info box after any search by Company
or ticker symbol.

For the next two weeks, you have FREE access to all of the business and financial data
available on over 15,000 U.S. public companies. Subscribe now! Go to http://www.edgar-online.com/trial_upgrade.asp for more information. (BROKERS: EDGAR Online offers a
Soft Dollar Payment option).

Need your user name and password? Go to http://www.edgar-online.com/username.asp.
Questions? Email us at support@edgar-online.com .
Want to speak to a live person? Call toll free at 800.416.6651 (203.852.5666 outside the
U.S.) Monday through Friday, from 9:00 am to 5:00 pm, ET.

Sincerely,

Celine Duffy
Vice President, Internet Marketing
EDGAR Online, Inc.

P.S. You can stop your trial and start your subscription right now, and make sure your alerts don't stop coming after the 2 weeks are over. Subscribe now at http://www.edgar-online.com/trial_upgrade.asp.

****************************************
NOTE:
****************************************
You are receiving this email as a registered user
of EDGAR Online. If you need your user name or
password, go to http://www.edgar-online.com/username.asp.
For help or to end your free trial, contact
support@edgar-online.com.
****************************************


Daren - Meter 9707 has flow for Oct. 1 (1.459mmbtu).  Deal # 125786 was used
for Sept. 2000.  Could you please extend the deal or have a new one
created?    Thanks.

AL


Right now I can plan on being there.

ds

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Anderson, Gary E.
Sent:	Thursday, June 14, 2001 3:00 PM
To:	Buchanan, John; Williams, Sammy; Schoolcraft, Darrell; Brickman, Ronnie; January, Steven; LeBeau, Randy; Spraggins, Gary
Cc:	Stern, Ellis
Subject:	RE: FW: 35830

It looks like this meeting is falling apart due to lack of attendees. Lets try to reschedule for June 27th, 2000, same time and place.
Thanks-
Gary

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Buchanan, John
Sent:	Thursday, June 14, 2001 12:20 PM
To:	Anderson, Gary E.
Cc:	Spraggins, Gary; Williams, Sammy; Schoolcraft, Darrell; Brickman, Ronnie; January, Steven; LeBeau, Randy
Subject:	Re: FW: 35830

I will not be able to attend, I will be on vacation all next week.

John Buchanan

From:	Gary E. Anderson/ENRON@enronXgate on 06/14/2001 11:57 AM
To:	John Buchanan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Gary Spraggins/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sammy Williams/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Darrell Schoolcraft/ENRON@enronXgate, Ronnie Brickman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven January/ENRON@enronXgate, Randy LeBeau/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject:	FW: 35830

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Anderson, Gary E.
Sent:	Thursday, June 14, 2001 9:49 AM
To:	Anderson, Gary E.;
Cc:	Stern, Ellis; Cessac, Kenneth
Subject:	RE: 35830

Please plan to attend a meeting scheduled for June 20, 2001 @ 10:00AM to 12:00, 3AC 0301, to discuss procedures for commissioning measurement facilities. If you can't personally attend, please have someone attend in your place. We would like to have a good cross section of representation from Operations, Measurement Technology, Measurement Services, Gas Control, Market Services, and  Marketing.
Thanks-
Gary

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Anderson, Gary E.
Sent:	Friday, June 01, 2001 1:09 PM
To:	Rice, Randy; Buchanan, John; Spraggins, Gary; Williams, Sammy; Schoolcraft, Darrell; Brickman, Ronnie; January, Steven
Cc:	Stern, Ellis; Barnes, Caroline
Subject:	FW: 35830

This was originally an Enron operated facility prior to selling of the gathering assets, which then became a Duke operated  facility. This point was re-activated in December,2000, without Measurement's knowledge, and apparently Market Services and others until April 2001. Had this been a new point, the current procedures for assigning station number, POI numbers, etc. would have probably prevented an incident such as this from occurring. Bottom line, in addition to generating PPAs and  distortion of the pipeline balance report by improper accounting of all receipts and deliveries, this has raised several areas of concern such as safety, transportation of unscheduled volumes, and others. We would like to schedule a meeting sometime in June (time and place to be announced),  to address procedurally, what all departmental requirements are for volumes to enter and exit our pipeline facilities. Please forward to contacts within you various organizations that you feel are necessary and critical to examination of current procedures, and possibly adoption of new ones, and let me know and I will add them to the distribution.
Thanks-
Gary
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sigrid MacPherson
Sent:	Thursday, April 12, 2001 1:04 PM
To:	Brostad, Karen; Metzler, Verlene; Mulligan, Amy
Cc:	Gary Anderson
Subject:	35830

I have gone back through all my own removal (First and Final) history and I didn't remove that one.  My own history goes back to 9/98 so it was done before then. The reset will be easy enough when we find something out assuming we use the same number.  Someone REALLY dropped the ball here!   Sigrid
---------------------- Forwarded by Sigrid MacPherson/GPGFIN/Enron on 04/12/2001 07:56 AM ---------------------------

  	Verlene Metzler 04/11/2001 01:53 PM

To:	Sigrid MacPherson/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON
cc:	Karen Brostad/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject:	35830

Karen Brostad called about this point,  Duke Schultz #1.  It was supposed to have been reconnected Dec, Jan time frame.  I called Ronnie and he said he remembers it but we had to assign a new number.  He didn't know what it is seeing as he's here in Houston.  I tried calling Sammy Williams, he too is in Houston.  I talked to Danny Garvin he only knew of one Duke connect and the name did not match up.  I also paged Randy Fitzgerald, he has not returned my call.  Karen is having the same problem getting hold of anyone.  I didn't see it on your first and finals either.  Anyway, if you know anything about this call Karen in the AM and let her know.

Thanks,
verlene


I verified the numbers with Ron, he did make the addition error.  I also added the line for
the Red Hawk lateral as a separate item.  James had already run the economics using $843mm plus a 5% risk adjustment adder for the Capex for a total of $885mm.  I think we have enough pad in this thing to take care of the error.

kh


Discussion regarding the duplicate invoices & Balance before bookout statements.


Scott,

I left a message with Vance and Melissa last night about the Base Gas Roll
process.  Do you have time Monday afternoon to discuss this?

D
---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 03/03/2000
03:16 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Melissa Graves                           03/03/2000 08:49 AM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vance L Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Acton/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Meeting re: Base Gas Roll

Darren,

Regarding your voice mail, Vance and I are free anytime today except 10-11am
and 2-2:30pm.  We are available anytime on Monday afternoon except 1-2pm.

Let us know what works for you.

Thanks,
Melissa


Good morning Ken,
Just wanted to take a moment to thank you for being the "Honorary Chair" for
the Cougars@Enron golf tournament to be held on March 21, 2001.  I enjoyed
meeting you at the "Enron Excellence Awards" presentation and genuinely
appreciate your support.  When we spoke, you said that you may not be able to
play in the tournament.  I certainly understand, but if you are available to
play (or make an appearance at the dinner afterward), it would most
beneficial to our outcome.  Please let me know if you are available.

Thanks,
Jeff McClellan
x34779


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Wesner-Soong, Sarah
Sent:	Thursday, November 01, 2001 5:24 PM
To:	McLaughlin Jr., Errol; Fischer, Jason
Cc:	Quigley, Dutch; Arnold, John
Subject:	FW: Contracts that need to be xpitted out
Importance:	High

Dutch - please double check the below information and comment on it.

According to Man, Man expected these positions to be xpitted per their conversations with Dutch and John on 10/31/2001.  They were not xpitted.  If these were supposed to be xpitted and we did not do it, please sign off on it so Jason and Errol can implement it early on Friday 11/2.
Please call me if there is any confusion so that we can put this issue to rest as early as possible.

Thanks, Sarah

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	kdavis@manfinancial.com@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, November 01, 2001 4:55 PM
To:	Whiting, Greg; Wesner-Soong, Sarah
Subject:	FW: Contracts that need to be xpited out

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Davis, Kevin (LDN Int)
> Sent:	Thursday, November 01, 2001 8:01 PM
> To:	'joseph.deffner@enron.com'
> Cc:	Polk, Ira (NY Corp)
> Subject:	Contracts that need to be xpited out
>
> Dear Joe
>
> Further to our telecon today here is a list of the positions that were NOT
> moved.....
>
>  Short 926 Q03 Futures
>  Short 220 Z02 295 Calls
>  Short 220 Z02 295 Puts
>  Long 1600 Z02 300 Puts
>  Short 100 Z02 330 Calls
>  Short 100 Z02 330 Puts
>  Long  30  Z02 370 Puts
>  Short 225 Z02 395 Calls
>  Short 225 Z02 395 Puts
>  Short 30 Z02 500 Calls
>  Short 30 Z02 600 Calls
>
> Regards,
>  Kevin R Davis


ocean view


---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 03/08/2000 03:16 PM
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources
	Canada Corp.

	From:  Peter Keohane                           03/03/2000 03:40 PM

Sent by: Nella Cappelletto
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Greg Johnston/CAL/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Enron Corp. Compliance Memo

Yes, we should add compliance with OTC Derivatives and/or Commodity Contracts
and Qualified Party requirements of the Securities Act (Alberta), Securities
Act (British Columbia) and Securities Act (Ontario).

Thanks, Peter

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Tana Jones                           03/02/2000 12:34 PM

To: Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Enron Corp. Compliance Memo

With regard to our annual review of this list of laws we need to comply with,
do we not want to add the Canadian provinces new "eligible swap participant"
equivalant rules?


Will be out of town. Thanks anyway. Rick

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Williamson, Joannie
Sent:	Wednesday, May 23, 2001 12:27 PM
To:	Bibi, Philippe A.; Blachman, Jeremy; Bowen Jr., Raymond; Brown, Michael; Buy, Rick; Causey, Richard; Cline, Wade; Cox, David; Delainey, David; Derrick Jr., James; Dietrich, Janet; Elliott, Steve; Fallon, Jim; Fastow, Andrew; Frevert, Mark; Glisan, Ben; Hannon, Kevin; Hayslett, Rod; Horton, Stanley; Hughes, James A.; Kean, Steven; Kitchen, Louise; Koenig, Mark; Lavorato, John; Lay, Kenneth; Leff, Dan; McCarty, Danny; McConnell, Mike; McDonald, Rebecca; McMahon, Jeffrey; Metts, Mark; Muller, Mark; Olson, Cindy; Pai, Lou; Piper, Greg; Rice, Ken; Scrimshaw, Matthew; Shankman, Jeffrey A.; Sherrick, Jeffrey; Sherriff, John; Sunde, Marty; Whalley, Greg
Cc:	Brenner, Ursula
Subject:	Jeff Skilling

Enron has purchased a table at the Houston Technology Forum for Tuesday, May 29 at the Hyatt.  Jeff Skilling will be speaking on the panel, along with Lloyd Bentsen III, Chairman of Houston Technology Center; Michael Capellas, President and CEO of Compaq Computer Corporation; and John Mendelsohn, M.D., President of U.T. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center.  Please let me know if you are interested in attending.  Details are as follows:

	The Houston Technology Forum
	Technology Trends Affecting Houston's Future
	Tuesday, May 29, 2001
	Hyatt Regency Imperial Ballroom
	10:45a - 11:30a		Registration & Networking
	11:30a - 1:30p		Luncheon & Program


Two of you had to leave the staff meeting before this final discussion point
and three of you were not in attendance, so I wanted to send you the attached
memo that I distributed at the end of the meeting.  This memo will be sent by
Rick Causey via notes mail regarding an additional role that I will assume
with regard to global operations.  I shared this in the staff meeting so that
you would be the first to know.  I will still fulfill my role within ENA as
VP of Energy Operations.  I will not be going away!  This expanded
responsibility should create addtional opportunities for operations personnel
and will validate some of the global functions that we already provide to the
organization.


Will do.

	Steven J Kean
	05/11/2001 08:35 AM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/Enron@EnronXGate, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject:

Ken Lay spoke with several California CEOs this morning and urged them to get
personally involved in pushing for a comprehensive set of reforms.  Three
expressed willingness to help.

Scott McNealy (Sun):  contact person - Piper Cole (piper.cole@sun.com);
scott.mcnealy@engeng.sun.com.  Mcnealy wants, by close of business today, a
"cheat sheet" of the talking points to use with politicians (the "8 or 10
elements of the solution") with the expected comeback he may hear from the
political leaders and our response to that comeback.  He says he hasn't spent
time working on issues in Sacremento so we may also want to include a list of
suggested contacts.
Kevin Sharer (Amgen): contact person - Sarah Jensen, VP of Engineering and
Operations (805.447.6785); ksharer@amgen.com.  Sharer wants the same
information as McNealy and he and McNealy both indicated their willingness to
call a meeting of other California CEOs.  Sharer will also be having
breakfast with Hertzberg one week from today.
Robert Day (Trust Co of the West):  said that he is very close to the mayor
of Los Angeles.  He urged Ken to call the mayor (mentioning Day).  Ken would
like some talking points for that call.

Jeff - please put these items together.


Okay.  I will inform the ENA commercial team that they will need to allocate
the total available line with ECTRIC.  I believe separate masters with
separate credit thresholds will be required.  Though I would appreciate input
from legal if we can somehow net Vitol S.A. (Swiss) with its US unit, Vitol
S.A. Inc. under one master and thus set only one, global limit without the
need to allocate.

Lee Munden@ECT
08/09/2000 03:42 AM
To: Paul Radous/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Neil R Anderson/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Vitol S.A.

Paul

Yes, we have received figures for end 12/99 plus unaudited figs for 31/5/00.
I believe Neil is doing the analysis and will input them into CAS - credit
Analysis shortly.

Lee
---------------------- Forwarded by Lee Munden/LON/ECT on 09/08/2000 09:43
---------------------------

From:  Paul Radous @ ENRON
         08/08/2000 21:22

To: Lee Munden/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Vitol S.A.

Lee

Just wanted to follow up and see if we have received the updated financials
yet from Vitol.

Paul


Ken

I shall E-mail you in an hour or two if I have any comments.
Shirley has my cell phone  number.

Vince

Kenneth Parkhill@ENRON
03/22/2001 02:03 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Wharton Tm #3 Presentation for Thursday, March 22

Hi Vince,
thanks for forwarding the presentation of team 3, I hadn't received it.
did you have any questions or comments for either team that you would like me
to pass along to the Wharton students this afternoon?

ken


I don't see a fit

	Lexi Elliott
	02/28/2001 02:39 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Chris Harman/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications
		 Subject: Will Hixon - UT Candidate

Steve:

Per my voicemail message to you, I have forwarded Will's resume for your
consideration.

Thank you!

lexi

---------------------- Forwarded by Lexi Elliott/NA/Enron on 02/28/2001 02:35
PM ---------------------------
From: Chris Harman@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS on 02/13/2001 10:15 PM
To: Lexi Elliott/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Will Hixon - UT Candidate

Lexi-

Thanks for your message.  Let me know what we can do with Will.  I know Rick,
so If you can have a conversation with him, let me know.

Thanks for your assistance in placing Will.  Call with any questions.

Regards,

Christopher T. Harman
Global Bandwidth Risk Management
Enron Broadband Services, Inc.
EB4429C
713-853-3064 direct
877-311-1909 pager
713-306-7245 mobile
chris_harman@enron.net
----- Forwarded by Chris Harman/Enron Communications on 02/13/01 10:13 PM
-----

	wlhv@hotmail.com
	01/16/01 11:42 AM

		 To: Chris Harman/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: interview (01-22-01)

Chris,
   Attached to this message is a copy of my resume.  A few thoughts on what
I would be interested in this summer:
1)Political
2)International

These are two areas which I have pursued in the past and might like to
continue with in the future.  Thanks for all your help.

Will Hixon
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


Attached are the admissions, interrogatories and document requests to the
PCA Trust.  We need to fax these by the end of tomorrow.  I will also be
reviewing tomorrow morning to catch formatting, conform all definitions,
etc.   I am traveling to Atlanta and will leave the office around 1:00 pm.
If you have comments after that, Melinda Jackson can incorporate them, but
I'd love to get them finalized and served before I leave.  As discovery
progesses, if necessary, we can ask follow up discovery as well.

 Thanks.
(See attached file: HO1-220934-EPMI'S FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR
ADMISSION.DOC)

(See attached file: HO1-220988-EPMI's 1st Set of Interrogatories.DOC)

(See attached file: HO1-221463-EPMI's First Request for Production.DOC)

**********NOTE**********
The information contained in this email message is intended only
for use of the individual or entity named above.  If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or
agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you
have received this communication in error, please immediately
notify us by telephone (713-546-5000), and destroy the original
message. Thank you.

 - HO1-220934-EPMI'S FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION.DOC
 - HO1-220988-EPMI's 1st Set of Interrogatories.DOC
 - HO1-221463-EPMI's First Request for Production.DOC


Please print the attachment at end of e:mail in color for me.  Thanks.
--Sally
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 02/05/2001 03:09 PM
---------------------------

From:  Sheri Thomas
  02/04/2001 12:30 PM

To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Sabre Auction Summary

Thought you might want to see what we are preparing for the DealBench team.
This was our first third party auction.  Although we had some major technical
issues (the site went down for over an hour between auctions), Sabre saved
over $500,000 which hopefully made up for the down time.  My team did an
excellent job calling the auction participants and reacting very quickly as
the site was brought back up.

Let me know if you have any questions.
Sheri
---------------------- Forwarded by Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT on 02/04/2001 12:27
PM ---------------------------
Dale Neuner   02/02/2001 01:56 PM

To: Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Sabre Auction Summary

---------------------- Forwarded by Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT on 02/02/2001 01:53
PM ---------------------------

Andrea Crump@ENRON
02/02/2001 10:55 AM
To: Ross Mesquita/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Suresh Raghavan/Corp/Enron@Enron, Dale Neuner
Subject: Sabre Auction Summary

Hello,

The Sabre, Inc. auction summary report is attached. The report is also
located in the Auction Deal online. Please let me know if you have any
comments or feedback.

Thank you,
Andrea
x54420


Hi Steve, yes I still have the bike for sale, I just decided to sell it last friday (11/23).  I hate to part with it, but I'm trying to raise capital to fund a business venture.  I don't have any pictures of it, but I can borrow my girlfriends digital camera and get you some; however, I won't see her until this friday (11/30), and we are heading out of town until 12/4.  I'll try to see if I can do anything before then, but I can't say for sure, as I don't own a computer or any computer equipment.  I only have computer access at my job.  In reference to shipping cost to Texas, shipping company's usually charge by size, weight, and distance travelled.  The bike doesn't weigh that much, but you'd probably have to check with a truck line to verify a freight prices.  In regard to the title, I do have the title, but
it's still in the person's name that I purchased the bike from.  He had it licensed, with tags on it, and rode it on the street.  I bought it just as a pit/play bike.  I take it to local motorcycle races on a trailer as a pit bike and ride it around my neighborhood, so I never licensed it to keep from paying sales tax.  If it becomes an issue, I can retitle it in my name. The unit has somewhere around 980 miles on it, and it has the optional headlight fairing and engine/radiator shroud/cowl.  The only thing that I did to it when I bought it was change all the fluids, lube, check everything over and adjust things as needed.  Let me know if you have any further questions or need more info.

Thx.

Greg Rowe

"Harris, Steven" wrote:

> Do you still have the bike for sale? I am very interested and would like
> to see a picture of it if you have one. Do you know if it could be
> shipped to Texas relatively inexpensively? Also, do you have the title?
> Thanks.
>
>         Steve Harris
>         (281)350-8441
>
> **********************************************************************
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
> **********************************************************************


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Chandler, Bob
Sent:	Friday, November 16, 2001 9:51 AM
To:	Lev, Jennifer
Cc:	Zahn, Gary; Walters Jr., Harry; McEllin, David
Subject:	FW: Information Request
Importance:	High

Could you please drop in the numbers Tracy is requesting (EGS IS tab for ETS and EOTT.
Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Geaccone, Tracy
Sent:	Friday, November 16, 2001 9:00 AM
To:	Saunders, James; Chandler, Bob; Sommers, Jeffrey E.; Anderson, Michael; Stevens, Kirk; Giles, Valerie; Lindholm, Tod A.; Walker, Blake
Cc:	Zahn, Gary; Walters Jr., Harry
Subject:	FW: Information Request
Importance:	High

Please see the three tabs for EGS and complete for your business unit.  I will need this back to me by 2:00 today so I can consolidate and give to Corp by 3:00.  The numbers should be the ones consolidated to Enron only.

Jim and Bob, can you complete the EGS IS tab for me for ETS and EOTT.

Thanks

Tracy

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Schwarzbach, Stephen
Sent:	Friday, November 16, 2001 8:16 AM
To:	Hodges, Georganne; Myers, Thomas; Geaccone, Tracy; Castleman, Kent; Ueckert, Allen W.; Smith, Kirk; Roper, Kerry; Vargas, Hope; Stubblefield, Wade
Cc:	Lindsey, Mark E.
Subject:	Information Request

Hello everyone.  I know that many, if not all of you, have worked on numerous requests/initiatives from the office of the chair and other teams lately.  That being said, we received a new request on Thursday night which is another look at some of the information your groups may have already provided, along with some other information.  Attached is a file, with the breakouts and formats as requested by management, containing four (for some of you, five) spreadsheets.  Please complete all of these sheets applicable to your business unit (note: dollars in millions).   The requested timing of the completion of this exercise is by 3pm Friday, November 15.  Please send the completed file back to me as soon as you are finished.  If you have any questions about the format or the contents of the file, please contact Michelle Nezi Marvin at 3-6848. For any other questions, please call Mark Lindsey at 3-1873.

Thanks,
Steve


These two deals have Palo Verde delivery point and CAISO energy.

#517814
#517813

Thanks!


I need 45 minutes max for finance comm meeting. Rick

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Valencia, Laura
Sent:	Thursday, December 06, 2001 9:29 AM
To:	Joyce, Mary; Buy, Rick; McMahon, Jeffrey; Bowen Jr., Raymond; Causey, Richard; Horton, Stanley
Cc:	Wright, Teresa; Heathman, Karen K.; Ford, Sue; Schiller, Marsha; Sullo, Sharon E; Carson, Rick L.; DeSpain, Tim; Parsons, Andrew; Westbrook, Sharron; Rieker, Paula; Stark, Cindy; West, Terry; Butler, Pam; Moore, Georgene
Subject:	Board Meeting Update
Importance:	High

As you are aware, we are in the process of rescheduling the Enron Corp. Board of Directors meeting.  Due to the proximity of the Holidays we will hold committee meetings and Board meeting on the same day.

Therefore, please let us know today the minimum amount of time you would need for your respective committee meetings.

Please be aware that some of our Directors will be joining the meeting via teleconference and we will therefore need to do all mail outs at least one week in advance.

As soon as we have a firm date for the Board meeting, we will advise you.

Thank you.

Laura Valencia
Executive Assistant
Tel:  713-853-6485
Fax:  713/853-2534


---------------------- Forwarded by Todd Peterson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
03/06/2001 01:51 PM ---------------------------

Nancy Corbet
08/02/2000 02:51 PM
To: Todd Peterson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Daniel R Rogers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: COU

Dan is not available today but asked me to get back to you on his behalf re
way forward on  Cou with Cabot . Basically he supports our earlier advice
that we try to get an agreement prior to the next delivery on the terms we
have proposed. We appreciate that that may be difficult given Cabot's
corporate situation and its disinclination to accept the terms. If Cabot is
suggesting something other than what we have proposed (ie knock for knock )
they should revise the agreement to reflect this and we can consider. Again
it will not be easy to get them to do any revision before the next delivery.
Suggest that you call Paul Parish and discuss with him the effect of a knock
for knock as you understand Cabot's position to be and then discuss this with
your commercial team.

We suspect that we may again be in same position we were last delivery , in
which case at a minimum we will have to send Cabot a similar letter saying
that we are not waiving any rights. If by chance we have come to agreement
verbally but have not a full agreement in place it would be wise to state the
agreed principles in a letter pending completion of the definitive agreement.
Nancy


Mark:

Cheryl would have access through IPass.  Have her talk to our floor tech so
he can explain how it works.

Janette Elbertson
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department - EB3326
Telephone:  (713) 853-7906
Fax:  (713) 646-2600
janette.elbertson@enron.com

	Mark Taylor
	03/01/2001 11:22 AM

		 To: Janette Elbertson/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Remote Access Request

Any idea how I should handle this?
----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 03/01/2001 11:22 AM -----

	Cheryl Nelson@ENRON
	Sent by: Keegan Farrell@ENRON
	03/01/2001 11:03 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Remote Access Request

I would like permission to request remote access from home.  I have a
personal laptop, and it would benefit me greatly to be able to work out of
the house.  Thank you for your attention to this matter.  Sincerely,

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3880D
(713) 345-4693


Tim

I assume you know that you have to make a presentation at the offsite.  Can
you send me a copy by Monday.  If not let me know.

Thanks John


Get the information you need on tech stocks from TheStreet.com's
Scott Moritz before other investors know what's going on!  Get
The Tech Edge absolutely FREE for two weeks!

http://sub.thestreet.com/c/go/XTEK/DEDM-exprd1?s=S961&D=XTEK

Dear Investor:

Will some tech stocks recover before others?  Should you sell
or hold tech stocks in your portfolio?  Is there a recovery
coming?  What are the hidden stock gems that you could profit
from right now?

Scott Moritz, known in the investment community for his
uncanny scoops on tech news and stories of critical importance to
investors, provides you with all of the answers in The Tech Edge,
TheStreet.com's newest premium product.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Click here for your FREE two-week trial subscription to The Tech Edge:

http://sub.thestreet.com/c/go/XTEK/DEDM-exprd1?s=S961&D=XTEK
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

With your FREE two-week trial subscription to The Tech Edge, you'll
get the kind of information you need to make sound investment
decisions.  As an exclusive member, you'll be entitled to these
member benefits:

*** An exclusive investigative report sent by email every other
Tuesday, giving you the inside story on tech stocks and what's
going on in the tech sector.

*** Top-10 lists of tech stocks, such as the attractive tech
stocks with low P/E ratios, best telecom picks and
10 tech stocks to dump now and more!

*** Special email reports when there are breaking developments in
the tech sector that might require action and can't wait for the
regular bi-weekly reports.

*** Answers to important questions from readers about tech
investing strategy that can help you become a better investor.

*** Bonus Report - 4 Little-Known Facts That Will Affect Your Tech
Investments In 2002.  This report will provide you with the kind of
information you need to succeed when investing in tech stocks
in today's market.

*** Bonus Report - Tech Investing in 2002: 2 Winners and
2 Losers.  This report is a must-have for investors interested in
tech stocks.

So what are you waiting for if you have absolutely nothing to lose?
Sign-up today for your FREE two-week trial subscription to The
Tech Edge and get the information you need to make well-informed
investments in tech stocks.

http://sub.thestreet.com/c/go/XTEK/DEDM-exprd1?s=S961&D=XTEK

Just a reminder:  Unless you notify us to cancel your subscription
before the end of your FREE two-week trial period, your subscription
will automatically continue and your credit card will be charged
$19.95 per month.  You may cancel your subscription by contacting
our Customer Service department at 1-800-562-9571.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Brought to you by TheStreet.com
www.thestreet.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------

TheStreet.com is not registered as a securities broker-dealer
or an investment advisor either with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission or with any state securities regulatory
authority. Both The Tech Edge website and represent Mr.
Moritz's own investment opinions, and should not be construed
as personalized investment advice. Mr. Moritz cannot and does
not assess, verify or guarantee the suitability of any particular
investment to your own situation. You bear responsibility for your
own investment research and decisions and should seek the advice of
a qualified securities professional before making any investment.

This email has been sent to you by TheStreet.com because
you are a current or former subscriber (either free-trial
or paid) to one of our web sites. If you would prefer not to receive
these types of emails from us in the future, please click here:
https://secure2.thestreet.com/cap/unsubscribe.do?Type=3  If you are
not a current or former subscriber, and you believe you received
this message in error, please forward this message to
members@realmoney.com, or call our customer service
department at 1-800-562-9571.

Please be assured that we respect the privacy of our
subscribers. To view our privacy policy, please
click here: http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/about/privacy.html


[IMAGE]
 	 	    Dear Eric,  Next week, Washington bureau coverage will be dominated by the questions surrounding a comprehensive energy bill.  Republicans and Democrats disagree on whether there is enough time and support to pass the bill, and Washington Bureau Chief Peter Cook says the dispute could threaten the bipartisan unity currently on the Hill.     While Senators try to resolve that issue, members of Congress are tackling other major energy topics.  Next week, the Senate Energy Committee will hold a hearing on the proposed natural gas pipeline connecting the lower 48 states to Alaska.  Also, the House Resources Committee will look into using federal land for renewable energy production.   CTN is sponsoring a major energy conference in Washington on Wednesday.  Vice President Dick Cheney, FERC Commissioner  Nora Mead Brownell and Williams CEO Keith Bailey are among those invited to the conference.  The Washington bureau will bring us coverage of the event on Wednesday.   Pace Consultants President Karl Bartholomew will join us from the Houston bureau next week.  Bartholomew will give us his thoughts on Wednesday about the EPA's plan to review low sulfur diesel rules.     Energy Intelligence Group Bureau Chief Barbara Shook will be another guest from the Houston bureau next week.  A couple of years ago, companies like Enron were planning to offer multiple services online.  On Thursday, Shook will ask the question, "What ever happened to convergence?"     Also next week from Houston, Platts Petrochemical Alert Managing Editor Annette Hugh will talk about the U.S. phasing out MTBE, and New Energy Economy Editor-in-Chief Roxane Richter will explain why trading energy over the web still hasn't caught on.  Catch all this from the Houston bureau next week.   Keep in mind things are subject to change at a moment's notice.  Occasionally guests cancel or change time slots.  We'll continue to do our best to keep you updated on future interviews and events.  Have a wonderful weekend!   Be sure to watch our newscasts every business day - 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. ET, at the top of each hour.   Keep it on energynewslive.com  for all your energy news.
 			[IMAGE]
	 	Jay Rickerts, EnergyNewsLive.com Anchor  View today's Energy Wrap  video: (Windows Media Player required) Broadband  (100k)   |  Dial-up  (56k)  Get  Windows Media Player   Experience all that Williams Energy  News Live has to offer!   If you are receiving this letter for the first time and wish to continue,  subscribe now    To stop receiving this letter,   unsubscribe now     If you are having trouble receiving this e-mail, please let us know  or  call (800) WILLIAMS (800-945-5426) weekdays, 7am-7pm CST.    Comments? Suggestions? Let us  know  or  call (800) WILLIAMS (800-945-5426) weekdays, 7am-7pm CST.    Copyright 2001 Williams Energy News Live, LLC. All  Rights Reserved.


Wes, that is fine - flush it.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 01/02/2001
10:34 PM ---------------------------

Larry L Izzo@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
01/02/2001 05:38 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Wes Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Keith Marlow/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: TURBINE COST

Dave,

Can you please confirm to Wes that you agreed to add $1.2MM to the transfer
price for the two GE 7EA turbines to compensate EECC for the cancellation
cost we took on the Westinghouse unit?  Thanks.

LI10001


Start Date: 1/17/02; HourAhead hour: 10;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011710.txt
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database


eSource presents Version 2.0 of eSearch, Enron's research website.   The 2.0
release features new content, including World Energy Markets, Country
Watch.com, and MindBranch.  The site has been designed with improved
navigation and new core components developed by eSource researchers.

Reflecting our commitment to add value and provide you with a competitive
advantage, we also have substantially increased the amount of information
available on the site about eSource's services and the eSearch web site.  For
example, we have added a Hot Topics page to introduce and explain new eSearch
features and to showcase products, web sites, and publications.  When you
visit our enhanced site you also will find much that is familiar, including
the ability to submit your research request online to one of eSource's
industry specialists.

In the upcoming months, we will continue to introduce many new enhancements,
including new applications, services, and publications.

Please feel free to contact us on our eSource hotline at 713-853-7877 if you
have any questions.

Visit http://esource.enron.com  to Discover a Wealth of Information at your
Desktop!


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/09/2001 01:20 PM -----

	Lynnette Barnes
	04/09/2001 01:15 PM

		 To: Tom Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marchris Robinson/NA/Enron@Enron, Bill
Moore/NA/Enron@Enron, Howard Fromer/NA/Enron@Enron, Frank
Rishe/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve Montovano/NA/Enron@Enron, Daniel
Allegretti/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Ader/HOU/EES@EES, Gloria
Ogenyi/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robert Frank/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary
Schoen/NA/Enron@Enron, Ron McNamara/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Stacey
Bolton/NA/Enron@Enron, Patrick Keene/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie
Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Stella Chan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Robert Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Roy
Boston/HOU/EES@EES, Barbara A Hueter/NA/Enron@Enron, bmerola@newpower@EES,
Susan M Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron, Janine Migden/NA/Enron@Enron, Kerry
Stroup/NA/Enron@Enron, bmerola@newpower.com, gduda@newpower@EES,
kmagruder@newpower.com, pbray@newpower.com, sbertin@newpower.com,
scovino@newpower.com, treichel@newpower.com, Amr
Ibrahim/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron,
Aleck Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: PPL Montana shows lucrative profit

PPL shows profits in 2000
By The Associated Press
HELENA (AP) ) Reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission show
PPL Montana made handsome profits in the lucrative Western power market in
2000.
PPL Montana owns most of the former Montana Power Co. electric-generating
plants in the state. In documents filed last month, the company reported
$86.7 million in net income for 2000.
The bulk of those profits came in the final three months of the year, when
regional power prices soared to record heights. PPL Montana reported $68.7
million net income for that period, or more than triple what it earned the
first nine months of the year.
PPL Montana also made these profits despite its obligation to supply 285,000
Montana Power Co. customers with relatively cheap power, under a contract
that expires next year.
Company officials said that since PPL Montana acquired the facilities in
December 1999, the company has sold about 69 percent of the power generated
to Montana Power Co. and other marketers for resale for end use in Montana.
Power left over after supplying the MPC customers is sold on the open market
to suppliers, who sell inside and outside Montana, resulting in its most
lucrative profits.
The power that PPL Montana sells to the Montana Power residential and small
business customers is priced at about $22.25 per megawatt hour (mwh). Sales
in the unregulated regional market are anywhere from $75 to $300 per mwh or
higher.
PPL Montana,s marketing division has refused to offer power to any Montana
customers at below-market prices, as have other marketers.
Some have said if PPL Montana made $87 million last year while supplying MPC
customers at $22.25 per mwh, why can,t it offer power at $35 to $40 per mwh
and still make considerable money?
PPL director of corporate communications Dan McCarthy said it,s not that
simple. He said other factors may influence sales and production, including a
low-water season this year, which would reduce the output of hydroelectric
plants and force the company to buy power on the open market to supply its
customers.
&You can,t extrapolate these numbers and say we,d make double (the profits)
at double the price,8 he said.
He also said last year,s $87 million in profits is little more than a 10
percent return on the company,s $800 million investment in the power plants )
about the same return made by Montana Power on its formerly regulated assets.
However, a Montana mining executive who,s been following PPL Montana,s
finances said last week that a 10 percent return after profits is a very good
return.
Greg Stricker, president of Montana Resources Inc. in Butte, also noted that
the high market prices for electricity that helped PPL triple its profits in
the final quarter of last year are still in effect, and are expected to stay
high this year.
If the company,s profits for the fourth quarter of 2000 are spread over a
year, PPL Montana would see a $275 million profit, or a return of 30 percent
to 35 percent on investment, Stricker said.
As part of its expenses, PPL Montana reported spending nearly $92 million to
buy power on the market to fulfill its supply contracts. However, that amount
did not increase markedly in the final quarter of last year.


Here is the REVISED schedule.

Thank you-
Meredith X57141
----- Forwarded by Meredith Philipp/Corp/Enron on 01/19/2001 05:01 PM -----

	Meredith Philipp
	01/19/2001 02:51 PM

		 To: Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Katherine
Brown/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Vance
Meyer/NA/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paula Rieker/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Earnings Media Interview Schedule

The following is the earnings media interview schedule for Monday, 1/22/01.
Please call me if you have any questions.

Thanks-
Meredith  x57141


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Rick Buy/HOU/ECT on 01/19/2001 08:31 AM
---------------------------

	Barry Pearce @ ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
	01/19/2001 08:17 AM

To: Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Enron/EBS India: Capital Expenditur/DASH's

A general tightening around India's broadband activities.

Kristina M (Legal) has advised India/Sanjay that all Legal
documents/contracts must be signed/approved from Houston.

John E now has signing authority over cash disbursements (non-regular G&A).

B.

	Rick Buy@ECT
	01/18/01 06:11 PM

		 To: Barry Pearce/Enron Communications@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Enron/EBS India: Capital Expenditur/DASH's

wow! what's behind this, not that I think it isn't a very prudent decision.
rick


Per your request.

Booked by Linda SDimmons x 5-7851


Peter, I hate to say, but I had the same thought earlier this morning.  Is
there not one thing we can do in this country without having a lawyer in the
middle of it.  We've all lost our common sense and direction.

It sure makes for good TV, though!  I sat all last night flipping from news
station to news station getting their spin on what's going on.  I can't say
I've ever paid this much attention to a presidential election before.  I've
been telling everybody your spin on the electoral college and the 3 party
system.  That was a good thought.

	Peter Keohane
	11/09/2000 04:37 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Jon Chapman/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: The Stae of a Nation

Congratulations.  It is now official.  The media and trial lawyers officially
govern the United Staes of America.  (I suppose it could be worse.  You could
live in the Peoples Republic of Canada, or have some appendage to an armbag
running the show.)


Lou's right, I probably won't be able to help answer any questions, but I am
happy to offer my insights on how to cut his budget.   DF

09/07/2000 06:47 PM
Louis Soldano
Louis Soldano
Louis Soldano
09/07/2000 06:47 PM
09/07/2000 06:47 PM
To: Elaine Concklin/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michael Moran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Eric
Benson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, William Kendrick/OTS/Enron@ENRON, John
Shafer/OTS/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: REMINDER: 3rd CE Officer Review for NNG and TW

do we ever end these financial reviews???  i'm on pins and needles waiting to
be "summoned" to expalin the $10 million "Soldano settlement" and i never get
a call....

i'll be in montana on monday...any questions about legal, indian row or
environmental please call drew...he won't be able to help but call him
anyway...

legal should be in good shape - just let mike know if anything comes up.
Stan knows the situation on the indian ROW (i asked him how he wanted to show
it in the budget) . i don't think we have issues for environmental but bill
kendrick would be in the best position to answer any questions (sorry
bill)....i'll be in friday morning if you think we need to discuss
anything....thx

	Elaine Concklin
	09/07/2000 06:38 PM

To: Bill Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John Dushinske/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Danny
McCarty/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Mike McGowan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kent
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michel
Nelson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dave Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rockey
Storie/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julia White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rod
Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Elaine Concklin/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, David
Clements/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve Gilbert/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John
Fiscus/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Stephanie Korbelik/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Allen
Cohrs/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dana Jones/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeanette
Doll/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lindy Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Mike Zabawa/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rick
Dietz/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Vera Apodaca/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Henry
Baker/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve Kleb/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sophie
Patel/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Louis Soldano/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Virginia O'Neill/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Julie Armstrong/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Deb
Cappiello/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Martha Benner/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Audrey
Robertson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dea Crum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sharon
Solon/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Judy Kudym/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ricki
Winters/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Julie McCoy/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rosemary
Gracey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Linda Wehring/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kathy
Campos/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Maria Perales/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve
Hotte/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Phil Lowry/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Bob
Chandler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, James Centilli/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: REMINDER: 3rd CE Officer Review for NNG and TW

REMINDER:

 3rd Current Estimate Officer Review for NNG and TW
 Monday,  September 11, 2000
 1:30 - 3:00 PM
 EB49C2 / OMA717

Thanks,  Elaine


Shirley,

Please, add Gary Hickerson to the list.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/07/2000
01:15 PM ---------------------------

Shirley Crenshaw
03/07/2000 10:15 AM
To: Elizabeth Grant/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathy McKay/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Candidate Interview

Hello.

Vince Kaminski and the Research Group would like to bring Ms. Nurit Krausz
to Houston for an exploratory interview.  She presently holds a post doctorate
position in the Mathematics Department at the University of Texas.

They have done a telephone interview with her and she is only available on
Tuesdays and Thursdays,  Looking at everyone's schedule the first available
date would be Tuesday, March 28.

Would you please set this up with her.  I do not know whether she would want
to drive or fly into Houston.  The interviewers would be:

Vince Kaminski
Stinson Gibner
Zimin Lu
Krishna Krishnarao
Grant Masson
Paulo Issler
Vasant Shanbhogue

Her resume is attached.

Thanks!

Shirley

 - RESUME.DOC


market_relations@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:

Dear Market Participants

The NYISO is reserving hours beginning 00:00 - 06:00 in the November 25,
2001 Real-Time Market as well as the following hours per ECA20010908B to
verify prices:

HQ:  23:00
NE:  23:00
OH:  23:00
PJM: 23:00

Prices in the November 26, 2001 Day-Ahead Market are correct.

This e-mail information is a copy of the official posting which can be
found at the following address of our website:
http://mis.nyiso.com/public/htm/OperMessages/CurrentOperMessages.htm#mm


All:

Here's the second tier of counterparties to add to the data retrieval list:

(11)	Medianews Group, Inc.

(12)	Macromedia Incorporated

(13)	British Airways plc

(14)	Merced Irrigation District

(15)	Eugene Water & Electric Board

(16)	Johns Manville INternational, Inc.

(17)	Public Service Company of Colorado

(18)	James Hardie Australia Finance Pty Ltd

(19)	Knight-Ridder, Inc.

(20)	Airtran Holdings, Inc.

Please include Bob, Susan, Samantha and Stephanie on the email for your counterparty analysis since they are compiling the counterparty data books.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks.  Sara

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shackleton, Sara
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 4:33 PM
To:	Gonzalez, Veronica
Subject:	FW:  TOP TEN counterparties (for ENA) - Non-Terminated, in-the-money positions (based upon FMTM information as of 11/30/01)

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shackleton, Sara
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 4:17 PM
To:	Tweed, Sheila
Cc:	Bailey, Susan; Boyd, Samantha; Panus, Stephanie; Sevitz, Robert; Moran, Tom
Subject:	RE:  TOP TEN counterparties (for ENA) - Non-Terminated, in-the-money positions (based upon FMTM information as of 11/30/01)

(1)	TXU Energy Trading Company

[(2)	BP Capital Energy Fund LP - may be subject to mutual termination]

(2)	Noble Gas Marketing Inc.

(3)	Puget Sound Energy, Inc.

(4)	Virginia Power Energy Marketing, Inc.

[(5)	T. Boone Pickens - may be subject to mutual termination]

(5)	Neumin Production Co.

[(6)	Sodra Skogsagarna Ek For - probably an ECTRIC counterparty]

(6)	Texaco Natural Gas Inc.  (may be booked incorrectly for Texaco, Inc. financial trades)

(7)	ACE Capital Re Overseas Ltd.

(8)	Nevada Power Company

(9)	Prior Energy Corporation

(10)	Select Energy, Inc.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tweed, Sheila
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 3:10 PM
To:	Shackleton, Sara
Subject:

Please send me the names of the 10 counterparties that we are evaluating.  Thanks!


Wiley: Rob Carter called and left a voice mail message referencing your
referral. I returned his call but had to leave a message on his voice mail.

This morning I requested an Enron PAC check for $5,000 which "maxes" Enron on
the McCollum campaign. That is, this is the second contribution of that
amount and the maximum PAC contribution allowed. Ken has made a personal
contribution and I have each for $2,000 which is the max. Ken also hosted an
event for Bill in Houston early in the campaign. I attended an event for Bill
last night in Washington and he asked that I convey his appreciation for
Ken's support. I hope this is helpful information.


The list looks good.  Let me just make sure my understanding of the titles is correct...

Lara
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shults, Bob
Sent:	02 October 2001 21:12
To:	McKinney, Lara
Cc:	Greenberg, Mark; Jones, Tana
Subject:	Norwegian Energy and First Energy

Lara,

We are finalizing a Broker Client deal with the referenced companies.  We are giving them access to European Gas, European Power, European Weather, European Bandwidth, European Coal and Brent Crude.  Is it appropriate to use the following as the exhibit for this transaction?

UK and European Gas
UK and European Power [McKinney, Lara]   - In this case 'European Power' does NOT include Nordic Power?
European Coal [McKinney, Lara]   - Do you mean ONLY European Coal and do not want to include US as well?
European Weather [McKinney, Lara]   In this case 'European Weather' does NOT included Nordic Weather?
European Bandwidth [McKinney, Lara]   There is an initiative to launch Asian Bandwidth products.  This is a ways from launch yet, but do you want it included?
Brent Crude [McKinney, Lara]   This one is pretty broad - since you have not listed a country, can I assume that you mean US, UK, and Asian Brent products?

Bob Shults
EnronOnline LLC
Houston, Texas 77002-7361
713 853-0397
713 825-6372 cell
713 646-2126
bob.shults@enron.com


Ken,
I wanted to let you know that I wish you well as you work through this
emergency.  If there is any way I can be helpful, please let me know.
Bill
703-934-3115


> -----Original Message-----
> From: McCarthy, Jane J
> Sent: Wednesday, 25 October 2000 16:55
> To: 'vkaminski@aol.com'
> Subject: notes for VAR course
>
> Dr. Kaminski,
>
> I attended your VAR course in Sydney in July, but when I went back to look
at the notes recently I found that I am missing some sections (e.g. Optimal
techniques for measuring VAR, Using Monte Carlo techniques to accurately
calculate VAR, Evaluating the impact of volatility and extreme values on
VAR). Would you be able to send me a copy of your notes, as I am about to
embark on a VAR modelling exercise and I am sure they would be very useful.
>
> regards,
> Jane McCarthy
> Manager Market Risk
> BHP Co. Pty Ltd.
> Lvl. 45, 600 Bourke Street
> Melbourne, VIC 3000
> AUSTRALIA
>
> Ph:  613 9 609 3860
> Fax:  613 9 609 3861
> email:  mccarthy.jane.j@bhp.com.au
>
>
>
EOM

NOTICE - This message contains information intended only for the use of the
addressee named above.  It may also be confidential and/or privileged.  If
you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified
that you must not disseminate, copy or take any action in reliance on it.  If
you have received this message in error please notify postmaster@bhp.com.


SURVEY FINDS PRODUCERS PLAN TO SPEND MORE THAN ORIGINALLY PLANNED IN 2000

 06/19/2000
 Petroleum Finance Week
 (c) 2000 Phillips Business Information, Inc.

 Oil and gas producers plan to increase their worldwide exploration and
production expenditures by more than they anticipated
 at the beginning of the year, Lehman Brothers Inc. found in a mid-year
update of its annual E&P survey. "The 326 companies
 we surveyed are planning on an 18.2 percent increase, versus a 10.2 percent
rise budgeted in December," said James D.
 Crandell, who follows oil services and drilling for the New York investment
banker.

 He emphasized that the gain by the 326 producers in Lehman's survey reflects
increases in budgets for 2000 and not
 underspending of budgets during 1999. "Among the companies that were
included in our December 1999 and May 2000
 surveys, global spending actually came in slightly above what was estimated
to have been spent during 1999 in December. It
 also indicates that nearly $6 billion has been added to 2000 worldwide
exploration budgets since December," Crandell said.

 The survey's respondents said that they planned to increase U.S. E&P
expenditures by 17.6 percent, up from 15.9 percent
 earlier in the year. Crandell said that the greater increase was driven
almost entirely by independent producers. "In our survey,
 227 independents indicated E&P spending growth in 2000 of 26.1 percent
versus a 22.9 percent increase budgeted for the
 year in December," he indicated. "Some 40 percent of the independents we
surveyed have increased their U.S. E&P budgets,
 while about 23 percent plan on spending less than what they indicated last
December. Higher natural gas prices and increased
 cash flow are the main drivers behind this."

 Crandell said that Anadarko Petroleum Corp. (NYSE: APC), Apache Corp. (NYSE:
APA), BHP Petroleum, H.S. Resources Inc.
 (NYSE: HSE), McMoRan Exploration Co. (NYSE: RAN), MDU Resources Group Inc.
(NYSE: MDU), Mitchell Energy and
 Development Corp. (NYSE: MND.A and MND.B), Santa Fe Snyder Corp. (NYSE:
SFS), Stone Energy Corp. (NYSE: SGY) and
 Titan Exploration Inc. - now Pure Resources Inc. (NYSE: PRS) - were among
the larger independents to make the most
 significant upward revisions. The ones that significantly reduced planned
U.S. E&P outlays for the year included Barrett
 Resources Corp. (NYSE: BRR), Belco Oil and Gas Corp. (NYSE: BOG), Burlington
Resources Inc. (NYSE: BR), Coastal Corp.
 (NYSE: CGP), Forcenergy Inc. (NYSE: FEN), Houston Exploration Co. (NYSE:
HEX), Kerr-McGee Corp. (NYSE: KMG), Mariner
 Energy Corp. and Williams Production Co.

 The survey found that major oil companies plan about the same percentage
gain in their 2000 U.S. E&P expenditures (8.8
 percent) at midyear as they did at the beginning of the year (8.4 percent).
Among the 14 companies in this category, 31
 percent made meaningful increases in their 2000 E&P spending estimates
during the first six months, including Amerada Hess
 Corp. (NYSE: AHC), Conoco Inc. (NYSE: COC.A and COC.B), Occidental Petroleum
Corp. (NYSE: OXY)and Total Fina Elf S.A.
 (NYSE: TOT). Another 19 percent - including ENI SpA (NYSE: E), Royal
Dutch/Shell (NYSE: RDP and STT) and Texaco Inc.
 (NYSE: TX) - scaled back their domestic spending estimates, while the
remaining 50 percent of the majors in the survey
 remained the same.

 'The increase in Canada... is nothing short of staggering...'

 "The increase in Canada indicated by the 85 companies in our survey is
nothing short of staggering," Crandell continued. Of
 the 85 companies that he contacted, 44.7 percent budgeted higher
expenditures for 2000 than for 1999. "Compared with
 December, 41 percent of them have increased their estimated spending in 2000
by more than 10 percent, while 20 percent
 have reduced it by more than 10 percent. The remaining 39 percent have kept
it within 10 percent of what was originally
 estimated," Crandell said. Talisman Energy Inc. (NYSE: TLM) led the group
with a huge increase, followed by Anderson
 Exploration Ltd. (TSE: AXL), Gulf Canada Resources Ltd. (NYSE: GOU), Murphy
Oil Corp. (NYSE: MUR), Pan Canadian
 Petroleum Ltd. (TSE: PCP) and Shell Canada Ltd. (TSE: SHC). Like their U.S.
counterparts, producers above the border raised
 their 2000 E&P budgets in response to higher gas prices and increased cash
flow, according to the Lehman analyst.

 He said that foreign upstream budgets were an area of surprise: "The 14.9
percent gain indicated by the 99 oil and gas
 companies that have operations outside the United States and Canada was well
above the 5.7 percent increase for 2000
 estimated last December. As in other geographies, there were more companies
that increased budgets than decreased them."
 Overall, Crandell said that 33 percent of the surveyed companies raised
their 2000 E&P budgets by more than 10 percent, 43
 estimated expenditures in roughly the same range and 24 percent indicated
that they would spend less than originally planned.
 He said that the larger increases were driven by some big companies which
materially increased their budgets, including
 Texaco, Petroleos Brasileiros S.A., Petroleos Mexicanos S.A. and Repsol YPF
S.A. (NYSE: REP) among the multinationals and
 Amerada Hess, Apache, Premier Oil Plc. and Woodside Energy among mid-sized
companies.

 Crandell noted that while respondents' average price assumptions rose during
2000's first six months (to $22.04 from $19.25
 per barrel of crude oil and to $2.58 from $2.38 per thousand cubic feet of
natural gas), they still trail current prices and what
 Lehman Brothers estimates for the year ($28 per barrel of crude and $3.30
per Mcf of gas). "This suggests a stronger second
 half than expected, should companies raise budgets further to reflect the
higher prices," he said.

 - Nick Snow in Washington
---------------------- Forwarded by John Peyton/HOU/ECT on 06/19/2000 07:36
PM ---------------------------

djcustomclips@djinteractive.com on 06/19/2000 08:27:26 PM
Please respond to nobody@mail1.djnr.com
To: 1346@WCTOPICS.djnr.com
cc:
Subject: Energy: Oil Drilling: SURVEY FINDS PRODUCERS PLAN TO SPEND MORE THAN
ORIGINALLY PLANNED IN ...

SURVEY FINDS PRODUCERS PLAN TO SPEND MORE THAN ORIGINALLY PLANNED IN
2000

  Oil and gas producers plan to increase their worldwide exploration and
production expenditures by more than they anticipated at the beginning
of the
year, Lehman Brothers Inc. found in a mid-year update of its annual E&P
survey. "The 326 companies we ...

Published by: Petroleum Finance Week
Date: 06/19/2000
Word Count: 894
Relevance Score on Scale of 100: 80
Folder Name: Energy: Oil Drilling

Full-text article available at
http://nrstg1p.djnr.com/cgi-bin/NewsRetrieval?cgi=WEB_ST_WC_STORY&DBNAME=ENERG
Y&HDAN=PTRY0017100008&Search=Energy%3A%20Oil%20%3A0000001346&QID=1346&QT=S&HDS
C=PTRY

Articles are included at no charge for flat-fee corporate customers. (Under
standard pricing, charges apply.  For details, click the $ icon on the Dow
Jones Interactive home page, located at http://www.djinteractive.com.)
______________________________________________________________________

To review or revise your folder, visit http://www.djinteractive.com or
contact Dow Jones Customer Service by e-mail at custom.news@bis.dowjones.com
or by phone at 800-369-7466. (Outside the U.S. and Canada, call 609-452-1511
or contact your local sales representative.)
______________________________________________________________________
Copyright (c) 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved


The following includes Charles' suggestions for tightening up the language of the last two sentences of the first paragraph:

What security measures with regard to the electric grid does Enron support?

NERC remains in Full Alert Status.  Per the Electricity Sector Information Sharing and Analysis Center (ES-ISAC), suggested actions at Full Alert may include:  selected maintenance curtailment; selected additional generation reserves in various states of readiness; staffing of backup control facilities; examination of connections of computers to outside communications, including the Internet and modems; and maintenance of close coordination with first responders, local law enforcement, and the local FBI.  In case of a specific threat to the grid, operators may take actions that include reducing transfers across interfaces to increase local control of generation dispatch patterns.  ENRON SUPPORTS ACTIONS NECESSARY TO SAFEGUARD THE GRID FROM ATTACKS.

Does Enron's position on information flow about electric grids contradict its stance on restricting certain information about gas pipeline operations for security reasons?

No.  Certain pipeline information that could be used to identify the physical location of assets has been restricted to those within the industry.  Pipeline information important for the operation of gas markets remains available to market participants.  The NERC action, however, restricts electric grid information even to market participants who need it in order to ensure the efficient operation of the wholesale electricity market.


sorry i've taken so long...just been trying to fend off the chicks.   life is
sooooo hard sometimes.

MONKEY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

From: Brian O'Rourke@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS on 01/04/2001 10:04 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Yeah Monkey!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Monkey;

Hey you little bastard, what the fuck are you doing in a picture in
E-Company???  What, do you think that should help you score women.  How do
you say BALANCE SHEET!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Yeah Monkey,

B


Here are all three documents I sent to Peter.

Gavin
---------------------- Forwarded by Gavin Dillingham/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
08/24/2000 12:48 PM ---------------------------

Gavin Dillingham
08/24/2000 12:48 PM
To: Peter Styles@ECT
cc:

Subject: Talking Points re "reregulation" in California

Peter, attached are three documents that Steve Kean said could be used for
external communication concerning the California Power Issue. The first one
is talking points from Jeannie Mandelker, following that is Steve's message
to the Executive Committee, and the final attachment, at the bottom of the
page, are talking points from Jeff Dasovich.

Let me know if you need further information.

Regards,

Gavin

______________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
To: Executive Committee

Subject: Talking Points re "reregulation" in California

As I promised this morning at the executive committee meeting, below are some
talking points for your use.

Overall message:  the market is working, regulation is not.

In California, peak demand rose by 10% over the last 4 years while new
capacity grew by only 2%.  But, as you would expect, the market responded by
proposing 8,000MW of new generation - - more than enough to offset the peak
demand growth.  The regulatory process, at both the state and local level,
has failed to site this new generation.  The problem is regulation, not
deregulation.

When San Diego customers began experiencing the effects of higher prices,
Enron responded with a fixed price which would have shielded San Diego
customers from price volatility and provided prices below their current
summer levels (Enron's price was about $55/MWH).  After publication of
Enron's offer, nine other companies made offers.  Again, the market responded
where regulation failed.  San Diego has not accepted any of these offers
because of regulatory/legislative restrictions on its ability to buy outside
of the PX (i.e. the spot market).

In markets where siting is easier, suppliers have moved to build additional
generation.  Enron built 3 plants in response to the 1998 price spikes.
Those plants were planned, sited and built in less that 12 months - - in time
for the summer of 1999.  Where regulatory hurdles are lower, the market
responds.

The solution to current pricing and reliability issues is more competition
not reregulation.  Policy makers should:

Open the transmission grid so that power can get from where it is to where it
is needed.

Expedite interconnection of new generation.

Expedite siting of new facilities.

Give customers a choice, so that they have better access to demand side
solutions.

Also attached is a more detailed discussion of California, prepared by Jeff
Dasovich of our San Francisco office.


Just wanted to pass along some information.

If you have e-mails or notices you wish to have distributed throughout  Enron they should be sent to:  Enron Messaging Administration/Corp/Enron.

For Information Call X35885, Messaging Administration Group

Taffy Milligan
Sr. Admin Assistant
EWS-Legal
Tele: 713-345-7373
Fax:  713-646-6058


Mark,
Thank you for you phonecall and getting back to me so quickly.  This e-mail
is to confirm that you will be providing CXY with a letter that clarifies a
few issues that were we were uncomfortable with in the Electronic Trading
Agreement for Enron Online.  We would like clarification that the Master
Agreement already entered into between the parties will govern all aspects
of any physical trades made online, including those respecting transaction
procedures.  Particularly, we would ask that you acknowledge that Enron
shall continue to send confirmations for each and every Transaction.

Although we understand that the key password holder has the ability to
cancel passwords, we would like the ability, over and above that, as a
company, to be able to notify you and have you cancel passwords or to
terminate the online trading agreement completely.  As it is drafted, only
Enron has the ability to terminate.

As we do not yet have the ability to use electronic signatures, notices must
be sent as set out in the Master Agreement or the ISDA, (which we appear to
be close to signing).

Thank you again for your assistance with these issues and we look forward to
receiving your letter. The traders are now happy.

Susan Schulli

 - att1.htm


please print
----- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 02/20/2001 08:10 AM -----

	Randal Maffett
	02/16/2001 12:00 PM

		 To: Doug Leach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Douglas S Friedman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marc De La
Roche/HOU/ECT@ECT, David A Terlip/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jennifer Fraser/HOU/ECT,
Don Schroeder/HOU/ECT@ECT, John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill
White/NA/Enron@Enron, John L Wilson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jim Goughary/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Adam Gross/HOU/ECT@ECT, Justin Cornett/NA/Enron@ENRON, Richard
Lassander/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jim Cole/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc: Beth A Ryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, (bcc: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT)
		 Subject: Crude/Products Strategy Meeting

As part of our process of developing a cohesive strategy for the crude &
products origination group, we are hosting a "Strategy Session" on Wednesday,
February 21 starting at 3:30 p.m.  It is expected to run about 3 hours.  The
location has not yet been determined but my assistant, Beth Ryan (x57161)
will confirm this next week.  This meeting replaces the prior meeting set up
for Thursday, 2/22 from 8 am to noon.  Representatives from McKinsey will
also participate/direct this meeting as facilitators to our strategic
process.  We're finalizing an agenda which will be forwarded to you once it
is complete.  (de la Roche/Terlip - please be sure this gets sent to all
attendees asap).

This will be a very important process which we feel your input is critical
and valuable.  I want to encourage everyone to not only attend but to be
proactive in the process as well.  This will start as somewhat of a
"brainstorming" session but our plan is to evolve into a definitive set of
priorities, opportunities and action items which we hope will create value
across both the trading and origination groups.  Given the size of the group,
it has been very challenging finding a convenient time and place to
accomodate everyone but I hope each of you will do what you can to attend.
We've purposefully started the meeting late to try and accomodate the
traders' schedule needs.

BETH:

WE NEED TO GET EITHER A CONF ROOM (preferably) OR RESERVE A MEETING ROOM AT
THE DOUBLETREE, HYATT OR WEDGE TOWER, ETC... FOR THIS MEETING.
PLEASE CHECK THE DISTRIBUTION LIST ABOVE AND COMPARE AGAINST YOUR LIST OF
ORIGINAL INVITES TO THIS MEETING.  IF I'VE MISSED SOMEONE, PLEASE BE SURE
THEY ARE NOTIFIED OF THE CHANGE IN DATE, TIME AND PLACE.  ALSO, BE SURE TO
LET MCKINSEY KNOW THE LOCATION AS WELL.


Bob:  FYI, my guys tried again last night to update and were unable to.


Steve, thanks for the note.  It was great to meet you.  I look forward to
seeing more of you in the future.

Regards,
Jeff


GILBERT-SMITH, DOUGLAS,
?
You have been selected to participate in the Mid Year 2001 Performance
Management process.  Your feedback plays an important role in the process,
and your participation is critical to the success of Enron's Performance
Management goals.
?
To complete a request for feedback, access PEP at http://pep.enron.com and
select Complete Feedback from the Main Menu.  You may begin providing
feedback immediately and are requested to have all feedback forms completed
by Friday, May 25, 2001.
?
If you have any questions regarding PEP or your responsibility in the
process, please contact the PEP Help Desk at:
Houston:  1.713.853.4777, Option 4 or email: perfmgmt@enron.com
London:  44.207.783.4040, Option 4 or email: pep.enquiries@enron.com
?
Thank you for your participation in this important process.
?
The following is a CUMULATIVE list of employee feedback requests with a
status of "OPEN."  Once you have submitted or declined an employee's request
for feedback, their name will no longer appear on this list.  NOTE: YOU WILL
RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE EACH TIME YOU ARE SELECTED AS A REVIEWER.
?
Employee Name:
CLINE, KEVIN
SANTUCCI, ANNA
THOMPSON, KERRI


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/10/2001
06:39 PM ---------------------------

"Walkup, David C (HOUSTONAS AS 582)" <dwalkup@pclient.ml.com> on 01/10/2001
11:39:57 AM
To: "'Vincent Kaminski'" <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: 2000 U.S. Collective Wisdom Portfolio (http: //psm20.mlpc.privnet.
us.ml.com/logi

 <<2000 U.S. Collective Wisdom Portfolio.htm>>

____________________________________________________________

CAUTION: Electronic mail sent through the Internet is not secure and could
be intercepted by a third party.  For your protection, avoid sending
identifying information, such as account, Social Security or card numbers to
us or others.  Further, do not send time-sensitive, action-oriented
messages, such as transaction orders, fund transfer instructions, or check
stop payments, as it is our policy not to accept such items electronicall

 - 2000 U.S. Collective Wisdom Portfolio.htm


As I mentioned in my voice mail, please check up on the signing bonus we
agreed to pay Tony Pryor.  He didn't get it and we need to get that fixed
asap.  I'll be at 37555 tomorrow and back in Omaha Monday.  If you learn
something tomorrow and can't get ahold of me, please leave me a voice mail.
Thanks.  DF


OK, for the Husker fans out there, in a time when I know you need a boost in morale after the fiasco in Boulder Saturday...

Check this out...

First, below is the current Bowl Championship Standings for this week...

http://espn.go.com/abcsports/bcs/rankings_full/index.html

Talk about respect for Nebraska.  Even after a 62-36 shellacking, they only fell to #4 in the BCS standings.  Below are the possibilities for each team in the top 6...

http://espn.go.com/ncf/s/2001/1119/1280619.html

So, you would think that would mean...   if two of the teams ahead of you lose this weekend, you guys would be in the championship game.  By comparison, Texas needs both Miami and Florida to lose to make it to the game, because of strength of schedule, quality wins, etc.

So, let's take that theory one step further...

1)  If both Miami and Florida lose you would think that would pit Nebraska and Texas against each other in the Rose Bowl.  Wow, a Big 12 National Championship!

2)  Texas still has to beat Colorado.  If Texas loses and one of the two top teams loses, it would seem like you guys are in as well.

But you know the computers will come up with some cockemamy calculation that won't make any sense.

In closing, consider the following facts regarding this weekend's games...

Miami could lose their last game away at dangerous Va. Tech.  A win over the 'Canes would make the season for the Hokies (see Oklahoma State).  Remember that Va. Tech was a top 5 team at one point this year and they are playing at home.   Also...  Miami has lost 5 out of the last 6 to Va. Tech!
Florida could lose to Tennessee -or- if they beat the 'Vols, they could lose to what appears will be a very dangerous LSU team in the SEC championship.
On the flip side - Tennessee could lose to Florida -or- if they beat the Gators, could end up against that same LSU team.
Lastly, there is the Jekyl & Hide longhorns playing against the Jekyl & Hide buffalos.

Hey...   stranger things have happened.  The possibilities are endless, as they say at 1400 Smith (at least for now).  Of course, that may be a dangerous correlation.

Mark


If you do not have access yet to the Financial Trading Agreement Database,
this link should get you access.  Hopefully when you open up your computer
tomorrow you will now have an icon to get in.  Credit people, if you do not
have edit capability let me know and I will get you access.

Link -->