-----Original Message-----
From: 	Miller, Stephanie
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 7:54 AM
To:	Whitt, Mark
Subject:	FW: WESTERN FRONTIER PROJECT

FYI - WE'RE CHECKING ON ENTERGY
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Calcagno, Suzanne
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 7:53 AM
To:	Kinsey, Lisa; Sullivan, Patti; Schrab, Mark L.; Miller, Stephanie; Superty, Robert
Subject:	WESTERN FRONTIER PROJECT

WILLIAMS PUTS MEAT ON THE BONES OF WESTERN FRONTIER PROJECT DESIGN

Touting a need for more pipeline capacity linking the "prolific" supply basins of the central Rockies and increasingly hungry Mid-Continent markets, The Williams Cos. Inc. last week took the next step by filing for authorization to build and operate the Western Frontier project.

The sponsor has in hand four negotiated-rate deals for long-term service covering roughly two-thirds of the 540,000 Dt/day of project design capacity, it told FERC in an Oct. 24 certificate application (CP02-11). Williams wants to have the $366 million project up and running by Nov. 1, 2003; it asked the commission to issue a final certificate by Dec. 11, 2002, so that it can commence construction by the following April.

Williams unveiled initial plans for Western Frontier early last summer (IF, 9 July, 14) and held an open season in June and July. To carry gas from the Power River, Big Horn, Wind River and Green River basins- estimated to hold 173 Tcf of potential and recoverable reserves - the new 30-inch-diameter mainline would run 398 miles, starting at the Cheyenne Hub and ending at an interconnection with the system of affiliate Williams Gas Pipelines Central Inc. in Beaver County, Okla. Characterizing the Cheyenne Hub as "a liquid point of supply," Williams asserted that "presently, supply capability to the hub has outpaced transportation capacity away from the hub to market areas due to insufficient pipeline infrastructure."

Along the way, the Western Frontier mainline would make another interconnection with Williams Central as well as with Northern Natural Gas Co., ANR Pipeline Co., Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America and Panhandle Eastern Pipeline Co., "thus providing multiple avenues for gas produced in the central Rockies to be transported throughout the Mid-Continent using the existing pipeline grid."

To "further enhance its supply options," the sponsor wants to build a 9.7-mile lateral from the mainline to the Wattenberg gas processing plant east of Denver to tap the Denver-Julesberg basin. Rounding out the project design are two new compressor stations, the 10,000-horsepower Chalk Bluff station to be constructed at the Cheyenne Hub and the 20,000-hp Denver station to be built in Adams County, Colo. Following the open season, Williams hammered out precedent agreements with Marathon Oil Co. (75,000 Dt/day), Williams Energy Marketing and Trading Co. (200,000 Dt/day), Utilicorp United Inc. (15,000 Dt/day) and Entergy Power Generation Corp. (75,000 Dt/day). The initial term for the deals is 10 years, except for Marathon which committed to a five-year term with an option to extend it an additional two years, said the application.

"Other shippers have expressed serious interest for the remaining capacity on Western Frontier, and active negotiations are moving forward with these potential shippers," said the application, adding that Williams was "confident . . . that the remaining capacity will be committed in the upcoming months." With the addition of compression, the project could "facilitate relatively inexpensive expansions to accommodate future market growth," the sponsor told FERC. And that may well be necessary, it continued, pointing to "stagnant to declining supply" in the Mid-Continent basins coupled with "projected demand increases." As in many areas of the country, "much of the anticipated demand increase is attributed to installation and operation of . . . gas-fired electrical generation," it said. The 11,439 Mw of "active winter generating capacity" in the combined service areas of Western Frontier and Williams Central is expected to more than double by 2004, said Williams.

The application seeks negotiated rate authority for the project operator, Western Frontier Pipeline Co. LLC, and approval of initial recourse rates. The maximum daily reservation rate under schedule FTS would be 35?/Dt for contract demand in Zone 1 and 79.4?/Dt in Zone 2. Under the negotiated deals reached with the four "anchor" shippers, Utilicorp and Entergy would pay a combined reservation and commodity rate of 25?/Dt at a 100% load factor for Zone 1 service to the Williams Central Hugoton station in Kansas, while WEM&T would pay a combined rate of 30?/Dt for Zone 2 transportation to the Williams Central system in Oklahoma and Marathon would pay 32?/Dt under the shorter contract for Zone 2 service to interconnects with ANR, Panhandle and Williams Central in
Oklahoma. All transportation would originate at the Cheyenne Hub.


---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 12/18/2000 02:35 PM
---------------------------

Mary Hain
12/18/2000 08:32 AM
To: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Summary of FERC's 12- 15 order on California Markets

---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 12/18/2000 08:41 AM
---------------------------

Mary Hain
12/17/2000 05:20 PM
To: Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Neil
Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Jubran Whalan/HOU/EES@EES, James E Keller/HOU/EES@EES,
Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@Enron, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark E
Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathryn
Corbally/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg
Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES,
Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paula
Rieker/Corp/Enron@ENRON, gfergus@brobeck.com, sbishop@gibbs-bruns.com, Tom
Alonso/PDX/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim
Buerkle/PDX/ECT@ECT, Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Dave Parquet, Paul
Choi/SF/ECT@ECT, Ed Clark/PDX/ECT@ECT, Stanley Cocke/PDX/ECT@ECT, Sean
Crandall/PDX/ECT@ECT, Terry W Donovan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Etringer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Fischer/PDX/ECT@ECT, John M Forney/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dave Fuller/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jim Gilbert/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Don Hammond/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tim Heizenrader/PDX/ECT@ECT, Karen E
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Holli Krebs/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Larsen/PDX/ECT@ECT, Elliot
Mainzer/PDX/ECT@ECT, Chris Mallory/PDX/ECT@ECT, John Malowney/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Wayne Mays/PDX/ECT@ECT, Marcie Milner, Matt Motley/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tracy
Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT, Murray P O'Neil/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey Oh/PDX/ECT@ECT, Todd
Perry/PDX/ECT@ECT, Dale Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lester Rawson/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Jeff Richter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stewart Rosman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diana
Scholtes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Shields/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeff G Slaughter/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Chris Stokley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Swerzbin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jake Thomas, Stephen
Thome/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank W Vickers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim Ward/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laura
Wente/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Wolfe@ECT, Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Summary of FERC's 12- 15 order on California Markets


John,

I wanted to talk to you about Disturnal's PRC when you get a chance. Give me a call 403 974 6733.

Regards,

Jon


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
          A MESSAGE FROM GOVERNOR GEORGE W. BUSH
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

                                     Sunday, November 5, 2000

  Dear Friend:

  Tuesday is Election Day and I'm asking for your vote.

  Americans are ready for a fresh start. They want a leader
  who trusts them -- not government -- to make decisions for
  their communities.  They want bold leadership that will
  reach across party lines to get things done.

  I am that leader.  I will work to change the tone in
  Washington, D.C. to use these good times for great
  purposes such as reforming public education so every
  child learns to read and creating an environment where
  entrepreneurs and families can flourish and realize their
  dreams.

  I am also committed to providing immediate prescription
  drug coverage for seniors and strengthening our Social
  Security to preserve its benefits for the greatest
  generation and their children and grandchildren.

  This is a close race. Every vote matters. I'm asking for
  your vote and your help.  I urge you to click on this
  link (http://www.georgewbush.com/you.html) for the tools
  that will help you get one undecided voter to vote.
  Please take your family, friends and neighbors to the
  polls to vote for me on Tuesday, November 7th.

  Sincerely,

  George W. Bush
  Governor
  State of Texas

  P.S. If you receive a phone call attacking me or my
  proposals please record it or make note of the attack
  and report it by calling 1-800-878-9374.

  Visit http://www.georgewbush.com

  AOL Links:
  The Power of You
  GeorgeWBush.com

_____________________________________________________________

  Paid for by Bush-Cheney 2000, Inc.
  http://www.georgewbush.com

  Campaign materials, wearables and more
  http://www.georgewbushstore.com

==============================================================================

To unsubscribe, please go here:

http://www.georgewbush.com/unsubscribe.asp?email=EBASS@ENRON.COM

To change
your e-mail address or any other subscription information, please go here:

http://www.georgewbush.com/MyGeorgeW.asp


Sounds like the IOUs will get some financial support from Davis tomorrow (at
least in words).

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/04/2001 11:05 PM -----

	Jean Munoz <jmunoz@mcnallytemple.com>
	04/04/2001 08:51 PM

		 To: "'Andy Brown (E-mail)'" <ABB@eslawfirm.com>, "'B Brown Andy (E-mail)'"
<andybrwn@earthlink.net>, "'Baker Carolyn (E-mail)'"
<cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "'Bob Escalante (E-mail)'"
<rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Bob Weisenmiller (E-mail)'"
<rbw@mrwassoc.com>, "'Curtis Kebler (E-mail)'"
<curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "Dean. Nistetter (E-mail)"
<Dean.Nistetter@dynegy.com>, "'Douglas Kerner (E-mail)'" <DKK@eslawfirm.com>,
"'Greg Blue (E-mail)'" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "'Jan Smutny-Jones (E-mail)'"
<smutny@iepa.com>, "'Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)'" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>,
"'Joe Ronan (E-mail)'" <joer@calpine.com>, "'John Larrea (E-mail)'"
<john.g.larrea@williams.com>, "'John Stout (E-mail)'"
<John_H_Stout@reliantenergy.com>, "'Julee Malinowski-Ball (E-mail)'"
<jmball@ns.net>, "'Kassandra Gough (E-mail)'" <kgough@calpine.com>, "'kent
Palmerton (E-mail)'" <kent.palmerton@williams.com>, "'Lynn Lednicky
(E-mail)'" <lale@dynegy.com>, "Marie Moretti (E-mail 2)"
<mmoretti@mccabeandcompany.net>, "'Marty Wilson (E-mail)'"
<mwilson@pstrategies.com>, "'McNally Ray (E-mail)'"
<rmcnally@mcnallytemple.com>, "''Nam Nguyen' (E-mail)'"
<nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>, "'Norton Kelli (E-mail)'"
<knorton@mcnallytemple.com>, "'Paula Hall-Collins (E-mail)'"
<paula.hall-collins@williams.com>, "'Pigott Jack (E-mail)'"
<jackp@calpine.com>, "'Richard Hyde (E-mail)'" <rwhyde@duke-energy.com>,
"'Roger Pelote (E-mail)'" <roger.pelote@williams.com>, "'Stephanie-Newell
(E-mail)'" <stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "'Sue Mara (E-mail)'"
<smara@enron.com>, "'Tom Ross (E-mail)'" <tross@mcnallytemple.com>, "Tom
Williams (E-mail)" <tcwillia@duke-energy.com>, "'Alex Sugaoka (E-mail)'"
<alex.sugaoka@uaecorp.com>, "'Bill Carlson (E-mail)'"
<william_carlson@wastemanagement.com>, "'Bill Woods (E-mail)'"
<billw@calpine.com>, "'Bob Ellery (E-mail)'" <bellery@spi-ind.com>, "'Bob
Gates (E-mail)'" <bob.gates@enron.com>, "'Cody Carter (E-mail)'"
<cody.carter@williams.com>, "'Curt Hatton (E-mail)'"
<Curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com>, "'David Parquet'" <david.parquet@enron.com>,
"'Dean Gosselin (E-mail)'" <dean_gosselin@fpl.com>, "'Doug Fernley (E-mail)'"
<fernley.doug@epenergy.com>, "'Duane Nelsen (E-mail)'"
<dnelsen@gwfpower.com>, "'Ed Tomeo (E-mail)'" <ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>,
"'Eileen Koch (E-mail)'" <eileenk@calpine.com>, "'Eric Eisenman (E-mail)'"
<eric.eisenman@gen.pge.com>, "'Frank DeRosa (E-mail)'"
<frank.derosa@gen.pge.com>, "Frazier Blaylock (E-mail)"
<frazier_blaylock@ogden-energy.com>, "'Hap Boyd (E-mail)'"
<Hap_Boyd@enron.com>, "'Hawks Jack (E-mail)'" <jack.hawks@gen.pge.com>, "'Jim
Willey (E-mail)'" <elliottsa@earthlink.net>, "'Joe Greco (E-mail)'"
<jgreco@caithnessenergy.com>, "'Jonathan Weisgall (E-mail)'"
<jweisgall@aol.com>, "'Kate Castillo (E-mail)'" <CCastillo@riobravo-gm.com>,
"'Kelly Lloyd (E-mail)'" <kellyl@enxco.com>, "'Ken Hoffman (E-mail)'"
<khoffman@caithnessenergy.com>, "'Kent Fickett (E-mail)'"
<kfickett@usgen.com>, "'Lynn Lednicky (E-mail)'"
<lynn.a.lednicky@dynegy.com>, "'Marty McFadden (E-mail)'"
<marty_mcfadden@ogden-energy.com>, "'Paula Soos'"
<paula_soos@ogden-energy.com>, "'Randy Hickok (E-mail)'"
<rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, "Rick S. Koebbe (E-mail)"
<rskoebbe@powerworksinc.com>, "'Rob Lamkin (E-mail)'"
<rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, "'Ross Ain (E-mail)'" <ain@worldnet.att.net>,
"'Steve Iliff'" <siliff@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Steve Ponder (E-mail)'"
<steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "'Tony Wetzel (E-mail)'" <twetzel@thermoecotek.com>,
"'William Hall (E-mail)'" <wfhall2@duke-energy.com>,
<trusso@mcnallytemple.com>, <sadlersa@earthlink.net>, <mstultz@epsa.org>,
<rtemple@mcnallytemple.com>, <tracy.fairchild@edelman.com>,
<megan.beiser@edelman.com>, <deborah.fiorito@dynegy.com>, <lchurch@epsa.org>,
Katie Kaplan <kaplan@iepa.com>, <tcwillia@duke-energy.com>,
<rwhyde@duke-energy.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Davis Press Conference

As you may have heard, Governor Davis intends to hold a press conference
Thursday evening at 6:05 PST to deliver "an important live address on energy
... will speak in detail about California's energy emergency and make an
important announcement." ?He has requested five minutes during evening
newscasts to make his remarks.

While there is no way to know specifics, we've heard rumor that his remarks
will include the following:

1. Discussion of rate increases
2. State's conservation efforts
3. Blame FERC for crisis
4. Point out what a great job he is doing

IEP is prepared to react immediately to the Governor's remarks if needed. ?

Below are two Dow Jones stories on the press conference, and a memo that was
released by Davis' top financial adviser, Joe Fichera.

We'll keep you posted -- but please alert me or Katie if you hear anything.

Thanks,
Jean

--
Jean Munoz
McNally Temple Associates, Inc.
916-447-8186
916-447-6326 (fx)

Calif Gov To Make 'Important' Energy Announcement Thurs  ????
Updated: Wednesday, April 4, 2001 08:17 AM?ET ????
?
(This article was originally published Wednesday)

By Jason Leopold

OF DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

LOS ANGELES (Dow Jones)--In a highly unusual move, California Gov. Gray Davis
Tuesday requested radio and television stations in the state to clear five
minutes of time Thursday evening so he can make an important announcement
regarding the state's energy crisis.

Davis is expected to deliver a speech at 6:05 p.m. PST and will likely talk
about the state's conservation efforts, a 4,000 megawatt shortfall expected
next month, the need to bring new generation online, recent rate hikes
ordered by the California Public Utilities Commission, and the possibility
for further rate increases this summer to keep the state's three
investor-owned utilities solvent, sources close to Davis told Dow Jones
Newswires.

The source said Davis is not expected to discuss a final agreement to buy the
power lines owned by PG&E Corp. (PCG, news, msgs), unit Pacific Gas &
Electric, Edison International's (EIX, news, msgs) unit, Southern California
Edison, and Sempra Energy's (SRE, news, msgs) unit, San Diego Gas & Electric.

Davis' press secretary, Steve Maviglio, would not comment on Davis' speech.

In a memo to the media, Davis' office said the governor will "deliver an
important live address on energy from his office in Sacramento. During this
historic address to the people of California, the governor will speak in
detail about California's energy emergency and make an important
announcement."

The last time a California governor interrupted a broadcast schedules was in
1992, when Republican Gov. Pete Wilson delivered a speech about the state's
budget problems, a spokesman in Davis' office said.

But Davis' staff said "this is the first time in recent memory that a
Governor has asked for time statewide to deliver a live address to the people
of California."

-By Jason Leopold; Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3874;
jason.leopold@dowjones.com

Calif Gov Staff To Speak To Analysts About Energy Crisis ?? ??
Updated: Wednesday, April 4, 2001 05:37 PM?ET ???
?
LOS ANGELES (Dow Jones)--California Gov. Gray Davis' advisers will speak to
Wall Street analysts Thursday following a live state address on the state's
energy crisis, according to an email sent to the financial community and
obtained by Dow Jones Newswires.

Daivs' staff, in a highly unusual move, asked radio and television
broadcasters to clear five minutes of air time Thursday night so Davis can
make an "important announcement" about the state's months-long energy crisis.

Sources close to the governor said Davis will discuss the state's
conservation efforts, a 4,000 megawatt supply shortfall expected this summer,
recent rate increases ordered by state regulators and the possibility for
further rate increases to replenish the state's budget surplus.

Davis is expected to discuss plans for keeping the state's three
investor-owned utilities, PG&E Corp. (PCG, news, msgs) unit Pacific Gas &
Electric, Edison International (EIX, news, msgs) unit Southern California
Edison and Sempra Energy (SRE, news, msgs) unit San Diego Gas & Electric,
solvent but he isn't expected to discuss a proposal to buy the utilities'
power lines.

Davis spokesman, Steve Maviglio, said he couldn't comment on the governor's
speech. He said, however, Davis has received the financial data regarding the
state's spending on wholesale electricity and what it expects to spend in the
months ahead.

In the email sent to Wall Street analysts, Davis' top financial adviser, Joe
Fichera, said the governor's advisers will hold a conference call at 9:45
p.m. EDT (0145 GMT) with analysts followed by a question-and-answer session.

Regarding Davis' speech Thursday, Fichera wrote in his email that "while
everyone will wish to speculate on what (Davis) will or will not say, I can
point out that the governor has been consistent in his goals to achieve:
significant demand side management, increased generation supply and
restoration of the financial health of the investor-owned utilities.

"All three components are important elements to resolving the energy
situation in California and will be addressed by the governor," Fichera wrote
in the email.

In addition, "it may go without saying, but the situation in California
involves many moving parts, many constituencies and independent players that
need to be brought together to resolve a problem that is of a size and scope
that no one anticipated," Fichera's email says.

"It certainly appears confusing and chaotic. The governor and his team
recognize the complexity of the problem and are rigorously attempting to move
the process to closure," the email says. "He is addressing all open issues so
that consumers, investors and others can achieve some certainty and move on.
We cannot make all the moving parts stop, nevertheless, the governor will
provide the leadership needed for a resolution."

-By Jason Leopold, Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3874;
jason.leopold@dowjones.com ????? ???

To: Members of the Financial Community
>
> Governor Gray Davis will make an important announcement about the energy
> crisis in California on Thursday at 6:05 PM PST.
>
> There will be a Financial Analyst conference call/presentation/Q&A with
> the Governor's advisors at 6:45 pm PST/9:45 pm EST. ?Details about the
> call-in number etc. will follow.
>
> While everyone will wish to speculate on what he will or will not say, I
> can point out that the Governor has been consistent in his goals to
> achieve:
> ?
> 1) significant demand side management (which reduces the State's need for
> expensive power and influences the spot market for power ),
> 2) increased generation supply (to provide reliability and stable prices)
> and
> 3) restoration of the financial health of the investor-owned utilities.
>
> All three components are important elements to resolving the energy
> situation in California and will be addressed by the Governor.
>
> It may go without saying but the situation in California involves many
> moving parts, many constituencies and independent players that need to be
> brought together to resolve a problem that is of a size and scope that no
> one anticipated. ?It certainly appears confusing and chaotic. ?The
> Governor and his team recognize the complexity of the problem and are
> rigorously attempting to move the process to closure. ?He is addressing
> all open issues so that consumers, investors and others can achieve some
> certainty and move on. ?We cannot make all the moving parts stop
> nevertheless, the Governor will provide the leadership needed for a
> resolution. ?
>
> We look forward to speaking with you tomorrow after the Governor's
> address.
>
> In the meantime, if you would like to speak to me or have any other
> questions, contact me at the numbers below.
>
> J
>
> Joseph S. Fichera
> Senior Managing Director & CEO
> Saber Partners, LLC
>
> Banker-Advisor
> Office of Governor Gray Davis
> State of California
> Sacramento, CA ?
>
> Tel: 916-324-3628
> Cel: 917-862-0619
>

 - Action Items


Well, Larry just won't let go of these contract issues, will he??
I believe the answer is that SWGas will always be billed based on the
one-part rate, regardless of how we choose to allocate the rate components.
My understanding is that the reason we reserve the right to allocate the
components is simply for internal accounting purposes, to keep any one
component from exceeding the max or going below the min.
Hope this helps; let me know if you have further questions!

Lorraine Lindberg
07/25/2000 02:59 PM
To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: TSA #27252

Any advice on how to respond?
---------------------- Forwarded by Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron on
07/25/2000 03:00 PM ---------------------------

Larry L Black <llblack@attglobal.net> on 07/25/2000 02:26:43 PM
Please respond to llblack@attglobal.net
To: "Lindberg, Lorraine" <llindbe@enron.com>
cc: "Gildersleeve, Dave" <dave.gildersleeve@swgas.com>

Subject: TSA #27252

Lorraine,
Confirmation that I did receive your executed TSA and Letter Agreement.
I'm so glad you are excited.  We have so little in our lives to give us
true excitement.  At my age, I try to reserve all events of elevated
blood pressure for only the esoteric things.  (Just kidding.)  I'm very
pleased we finally got this done.  Now for the pipe wrench and welder
folks to get the physical jobs done, as well.

Unfortunately, the work is never over.  I will now try to concentrate on
the OBA, which has been sitting by the sideline for a long time.  Will
get back to you on that as soon as I can.

As for the TSA rate, I have a few questions.  We have agreed that TWPL
would allocate the rate between fixed and variable components.  I have
never been clear on just when and how that will be done.  I have assumed
you would make that call, let us know, and it would be over.  Is there
any idea that issue would be a changing thing, or is it "once done,
always done"?  Further, what factors do you use to make that
determination and what, if any, rules and regulations apply?  From
different views, I'd like to have it all variable and you would like to
have it all fixed.  What is the process here?

I will get back to you soon on the OBA stuff.  Meanwhile, chill that
champagne!
Larry

 - llblack.vcf


---------------------- Forwarded by J Mark Metts/NA/Enron on 10/25/2000 07:45
PM ---------------------------
From: Tim DeSpain@ECT on 10/25/2000 04:57 PM
To: J Mark Metts/NA/Enron@Enron, Lance Schuler-Legal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Rating Agency Talking Points

Please see attached revision pursuant to our meeting earlier today.  Let me
know if you have any questions or comments.

Tim


it is now done.
PL


Dear Power Outage Database Customer,

Attached you will find an excel document. The outages contained within
are forced or rescheduled outages. Your daily delivery will still
contain these outages.

In addition to the two excel documents, there is a dbf file that is
formatted like your daily deliveries you receive nightly. This will
enable you to load the data into your regular database. Any questions
please let me know. Thanks.

Greg Elliott
IIR, Inc.
713-783-5147 x 3481
gelliott@focusmarketing.com

THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL IS LEGALLY PRIVILEGED AND
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR
ENTITY NAMED ABOVE.  YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION,
DISTRIBUTION, OR COPY OF THIS E-MAIL TO UNAUTHORIZED ENTITIES IS
STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL IN ERROR, PLEASE
DELETE IT.

 - OUTAGE.dbf
 - 111501.xls


Linda,

Attached is a clean document for execution.  If in agreement, please sign two originals and forward same to my attention for final signature.  I will return a fully executed agreement for your records.  Do not hesitate to give me a call should you have any questions regarding the enclosed.

Best regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Legal
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron
713-853-7658
713-646-3490 Fax


Special Invitees,

Please launch your holiday invitation from Enron Net Works.

Liz Taylor
Assistant to Greg Whalley

---------------------- Forwarded by Liz M Taylor/HOU/ECT on 11/14/2000 01:17
PM ---------------------------
   Office of the Chairman - Enron Net Works LLC

From: Office of the Chairman - Enron Net Works LLC@ENRON on 11/07/2000 05:51
PM
Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: ENW-Employees_Houston
cc:
Subject: ENW Holiday Party Invitation

Here it is!  Your Enron Net Works Holiday Party Invitation.  Please click on
the attached link to launch.

http://207.21.193.94/Extravaganza.html


1st group evalutes promotions to VP.

Ben is on the analyst PRC.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/20/2001 06:04
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Ken Lay and Jeff Skilling                           03/16/2001 10:34 PM

Sent by: Ken Lay and Jeff Skilling
To: All Enron Worldwide
cc:

Subject: Leadership Committees

We are launching a number of committees to perform key functions across
Enron.  Enron,s breadth of activities and nonhierarchal organization make it
increasingly necessary to broaden the participation of Enron,s next
generation of leadership in the important decisions affecting the company.
Broadening participation will result in increased access to information as
decisions are made and will allow committee members to extend their working
relationships and influence throughout the company.

The committee charters and memberships are set forth below.  Not everyone
listed has been contacted in advance.  We urge you to serve if at all
possible, but, if you cannot, please contact the committee chair.

VP PRC

The VP PRC will continue to be responsible for evaluating the performance of
Enron,s Vice Presidents, determining promotions to Vice President, and
recommending promotions to Managing Director.  Additionally, the VP PRC will
review and propose changes to the PRC process, the performance evaluation
criteria and the promotion criteria.

The VP PRC will be chaired by Dave Delainey and its membership is as follows:

Tim Belden	Ben Glisan	Danny McCarty
Michael Brown	Joe Gold	Jeff McMahon
Rick Buy	Mark Haedicke	Rob Milnthorp
Wes Colwell	Jim Hughes	Matthew Scrimshaw
David Cox	Louise Kitchen	Jeff Shankman
Janet Dietrich	Michael Kopper	Richard Shapiro
Dave Duran	John Lavorato	Marty Sunde
Jim Fallon	Dan Leff

Analyst/Associate PRC

The analyst/associate PRC will be divided into 3 groups.  Enron Europe will
have the same committee evaluate analysts and associates.  This group will be
chaired by John Sherriff and its membership is as follows:

Pierre Aury	Kevin Heffron	Andreas Radmacher
Rob Bayley	Joe Hirl	Stuart Rexrode
Paul Chivers	Chris Mahoney	Marcello Romano
Markus Fiala	Christopher McKey	Bjarne Schieldrop
David Gallagher	Roy Poyntz	Ron Slimp
Bruce Garner	Paul Quilkey	Rob Stewart

The associate PRC for the Americas will be chaired by Stan Horton and its
membership is as follows:

Sally Beck 	Troy Henry	Kevin Presto
Jeremy Blachman	Sean Holmes 	Brad Richter
Don Black	Sean Long 	Stewart Seeligson
Dan Castagnola 	Rodney Malcolm	Hunter Shively
Joe Deffner	Scott Neal 	Jim Steffes
Kevin Garland	John Nowlan 	Andy Zipper
David Gorte	Ozzie Pagan

The analyst PRC for the Americas will be chaired by Steve Kean and its
membership is as follows:

Federico Cerisoli 	Mark Jackson 	Everett Plante
Jennifer Fraser 	Ben Jacoby 	Paul Racicot
Derrick Davies	Steve Jernigan 	Angela Schwarz
Scott Gahn 	Jay Lewis 	Ed Smida
Rod Hayslett	Cheryl Lipshutz 	Jon Thomsen
Rogers Herndon 	Michael Mann	Emilio Vicens
Brenda Herod 	Ed McMichael 	Frank Vickers
Kevin Howard 	Steve Meyers

Analyst/Associate Program

The most essential determinant of Enron,s continued growth is our ability to
attract and develop new talent.  The analyst/associate program has been the
biggest contributor to our success in this area.  Charlene Jackson, currently
leading our analyst/associate program, has taken a commercial position in
EES, account management organization.  We thank Charlene for her hard work
and many contributions to the program.  Going forward, this program will be
administered by a committee chaired by John Sherriff, CEO of Enron Europe.
The members of this committee are listed below.  Billy Lemmons, currently
Vice President of Enron Global Markets, will lead the day-to-day operations
of the program. Billy joined Enron in 1992, and has served in a variety of
commercial capacities across the company and has been an active participant
in the Associate /Analyst program.  Please join us in congratulating Billy on
his new responsibilities.

Phillip Allen	Andy Fastow	Eric Shaw
Robina Barker-Bennett	Kevin Garland	Hunter Shively
Rick Causey	Ken Rice	Stu Staley
Joe Deffner

Culture

We are combining the vision and values, diversity and corporate
responsibility committees into a single corporate culture committee chaired
by Ken Lay.  Cindy Olson, Beth Tilney and Kelly Kimberly will serve as
executive directors of this committee.  This committee will focus on
leadership and work-life issues (making it easier to attract and retain the
best talent), in addition to continuing the work of the vision and values,
diversity and corporate responsibility task forces.  The members of this
committee are as follows:

Greg Adams	Louise Kitchen	Mark Palmer
Shelley Corman	Michael Kopper	Paula Rieker
Janet Dietrich	Richard Lewis	Jeff Shankman
Jeff Donahue	Sean Long	Mitch Taylor
Gene Humphrey	Dan McCarty	Mike Terraso
Robert Jones	Jean Mrha

The Corporate Policy Committee will conduct the MD PRC and review the
recommendations of the other committees, giving substantial deference to the
decisions of those other committees.  We will be forming other committees to
deal with other significant functions, tasks and issues facing the company.


Beth

Please respond with a plan to solve these problems.

Thanks John
---------------------- Forwarded by John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron on 07/06/2000
07:42 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Kevin M Presto @ ECT                           07/05/2000 07:39 PM

To: John Lavorato
cc: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristin Albrecht/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beth
Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Power Port Calc Issues

Guys,
This Enpower calc issue is a joke.   How can we be the most Innovative
Company in the world and cannot fix a risk book calculation problem.
Furthermore, how can we effectively grow our volumes and complexity of our
power transactions when our back office (risk books, position management,
settlements) is so unreliable from an IT standpoint.

In addition, we will start losing all of our key people in this area because
they are here until 8:30-9:00 every night and 4:00 pm on "holidays".  This
whole issue is a significant business risk for Enron and needs to be dealt
with accordingly.

Please advise.  Thank you.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT on 07/05/2000
07:27 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kristin Albrecht                           07/05/2000 11:30 AM

To: Beth Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randy Matson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jarod
Jenson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christine Nguyen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Zhiyong Wei/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Ravi Ramachandran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey W White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jenny
Latham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jenny Rub/GPGFIN/Enron@Enron
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim
Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Power Port Calc Issues

The Power risk group continues to experience severe instability with the
power port calc.  The same memory allocation issue which I discussed in the
message below is not resolved (we have had this problem for about four months
now).  Due to business reasons, we calculated the east power books on Monday
(Enron holiday).  We received all of the required data to calc by 9:30 AM and
should have been completely done by 11:30.  However, the calc crashed six
times and finally completed on the seventh try.  We were able to leave by
4:00.  The point I am trying to make is that I feel that we are at such a
state that there is risk that we could not provide positions to the traders
by the start of the next business day.  This could have a financial impact on
our company.  Once again, I am urgently and desperately asking for resolution
of this problem.
Furthermore, it came to my attention on Friday that EES is now using EnPower
and the power port calc and they too are using the same server that we are.
I question this decision since we cannot seem to support the existing
business that is using that server.  Per discussion with Kevin Presto, the
agreement made regarding EES's use of EnPower was there would be no expense
or degradation to ENA's business process.  I think they need to move to
another server.
Please call to discuss when this will be resolved.  Thank You.
Kristin Albrecht
3-4763

---------------------- Forwarded by Kristin Albrecht/HOU/ECT on 07/05/2000
09:35 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kristin Albrecht                           05/15/2000 09:48 AM

To: Beth Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randy Matson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jarod
Jenson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christine Nguyen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Zhiyong Wei/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Ravi Ramachandran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey W White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jenny
Latham/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: athena vs quark

With regards to the message below, we must have athena (server) to run our
nightly risk books for the power group.  We run one of our three east power
calcs on this machine (the second largest one).  Since an acceptable solution
for the big power calc has not been provided to us, athena CANNOT be taken
away from us.  The east power calc crashed 3 out of 5 days last week.  We
usually start calcing at about 4:00.  The calc time is now running at 1.5
hours and we have about 1.5 hours' worth of work after the calc's successful
completion.  So you do the math on what time my group leaves the building
when the calc crashes at 4:30.
Furthermore, the West power calc has crashed 3 out of 5 nights weekly for the
last 3 weeks.  This is not acceptable.
We are about to enter the busiest and most volatile time of the year and our
system is not stable.  I feel like we have been very patient at the expense
of many late nights.  I am going to speak to Kevin Presto and Tim Belden
today about these problems.
I think we need to meet immediately about this problem and I am exhausted
with the finger pointing between different IT groups.
Thanks.
Kristin Albrecht
---------------------- Forwarded by Kristin Albrecht/HOU/ECT on 05/15/2000
09:27 AM ---------------------------

Christine Nguyen
05/12/2000 01:01 PM
To: Ravi Ramachandran/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Randy Matson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: athena vs quark

Ravi,
       Please advise your users that athena will be completely unavailable
starting
Wednesday17May2000.  The production server is quark (12gb RAMx18procs).
quark is configured to our standard for your use.
Thanks,
-Christine


All:

I said I would keep you in the loop on cost with these publications.  Please review the PIRA cost structure and let me know if you will be interested and the amount of users for this publication.  Note price increases for each site.

Thanks,

Danielle

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Steele [mailto:jsteele@pira.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 2:46 PM
To: Marcinkowski, Danielle
Subject: PIRA Energy Group and Enron

Dear Danielle,

It was a pleasure talking with you today.  PIRA would be delighted to
restart the relationship it has had with Enron over the course of the last
decade.  As a first step, I have attached an excel file presenting PIRA's
site license pricing matrix, which provides the fees for PIRA's Retainer
Services (oil, gas, electricity), based on different levels of usage.

I have also attached a document listing all of our energy service offerings
and studies, along with the corresponding fees, for you to review.

Please contact me if you have any questions.  I look forward to talking with
you further.

Regards,

Jeff Steele
Manager, Business Development
PIRA Energy Group
(212) 686-6808, ext. 331
jsteele@pira.com


"Kitty Fun Barbie"
Complete with Marshmallow the cat (with long, brushable fur), cat toys,
little cans of Fancy Feast, and, get this:  a carrier thaqt becomes a litter
box!  "Marshmallow drinks and wets in the litter box.  Scoop up the clumps
after she goes.  So real!"


Beth Perlman tells me that you are in charge on this system.  It does not
work.  I thought that this was going to be corrected last week.  I am
confused about why we are using a system that does not work.  I understand
that there are bugs in the system.  Was the system tested before being put
into production?

I tried to reach you by phone.  You were unavailable and I could not leave a
voice mail because that was full.  I talked with Torey Hayden and verbally
okayed the access for Bob Hall.

Please call me and let me know when the system will be working correctly and
how you are going to manage these approvals in the interim while the system
is not functioning.  You might at least put a contact name and number on
these things if you are going to continue to send these out before the system
is fixed.

My number is 35926.  I look forward to hearing from you on solutions and
timing.

---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 08/23/2000 11:53 AM
---------------------------

ARSystem@ect.enron.com on 08/22/2000 06:35:31 PM
To: sally.beck@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Request Submitted: Access Request for bob.m.hall@enron.com

Please review and act upon this request. You have received this email because
the requester specified you as their Manager. Please click
http://itcApps.corp.enron.com/srrs/Approve/Detail.asp?ID=000000000001833&Email
=sally.beck@enron.com to approve the req

Request ID          : 000000000001833
Request Create Date : 8/22/00 6:34:12 PM
Requested For       : bob.m.hall@enron.com
Resource Name       : Live Link
Resource Type       : Applications


One of Travel Agency in the Park's major phone lines has been damaged due to
downtown construction.  The line is currently being repaired with an
estimated down time of approximately 4-6 more hours.  Calls are currently
being routed to 713-853-4801 and 713-345-5164.  We will send additional
notification if this problem persists.  We apologize for any inconvenience.


Prebon sent over another confirmation for this non-verbaled deal:

Enron sells to Pacificorp Dec 6- Dec 31 25 Mw of Mid-C at $551.00


I say go ahead with the call to work through any nits etc.  We will need a
follow up call anyway, once we know what to do to meet the accting
objectives.  This means you won't be available at 200 to talk with the accts,
but that's ok.

Finalizing the extension sounds good to me.

Kay

"Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com> on 04/17/2001 11:24:51 AM
To: "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>, "Keffer, John"
<JKeffer@KSLAW.com>
cc: "Reuter, Marisa" <MReuter@KSLAW.com>

Subject: RE: Northwestern

Do you want me to postpone the call (I expect they are flexible)?.  Do you
want me to listen in on the meeting with the accountants?

Do you want me to communicate with Marguerite to get the extension in shape
for signing?

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 11:23 AM
To: Keffer, John
Cc: Reuter, Marisa
Subject: RE: Northwestern

Ben is ok with the extension.

Ben and I have a meeting with the accountants at 200 (just got scheduled -
got to take the apptment when we can).  I'm happy for you guys to go
forward with the call. Ben and I will join later if we finish in time.

Kay

"Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com> on 04/16/2001 06:17:32 PM

To:   "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>, "Reuter, Marisa"
      <MReuter@KSLAW.com>
cc:

Subject:  RE: Northwestern

I've talked to Marguerite.  She agreed to a call tomorrow at 2 PM central.
She is sending to you and me a draft of an extension.  No need to do
anything with it tonight, but I suspect that Mike will begin calling Ben
about it in the morning.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2001 6:12 PM
To: mreuter@kslaw.com; jkeffer@kslaw.com
Subject: Northwestern

Hi there,

I am meeting with Ben tomorrow to discuss NWestern.  I'm fairly confident
that he will be willing to extend the letter agreement, but he hasn't
called me back today to confirm.

Ms. Kahn and I have exchanged voice mail.  Could one of you return her call
for me?  I'm tied up.  You might get an idea on some times tomorrow for a
call.  I'm booked until around 130 for anything which would last more than
a few minutes.  I'll check with Ben.

Thank you,

Kay

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not
the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.


As you have heard, Dynegy is terminating the merger agreement today.  Among other things, this means we are now free to pursue other alternatives - which we are actively doing.  As a consequence of uncertainty about the deal - and now Dynegy's announcement - Enron's debt was downgraded to below investment grade levels today by S&P, Moody's and Fitch.

In response to this action, we have initiated a plan to protect value in our core trading and other energy businesses.  At the same time, we are nearing the completion of the business review process announced last week.  Once this process is complete, we will be conducting a comprehensive restructuring of our business.  Regrettably, but unavoidably, this will include the sale of non-core assets and the implementation of a comprehensive cost saving plan, including layoffs.

We are taking these actions to focus our resources on preserving the value of our core businesses, retaining our employees who are key to our future success, and maintaining relationships with our trading counterparties.  This must be our priority to establish a more solid footing for the rest of Enron.

I know you have serious concerns about what this all means for you.  Although, there are no guarantees, you should know that we are still in this fight and remain absolutely committed to protecting the value of the ongoing businesses of Enron.  All I can ask is that we all be supportive of each other, stay focused on our work as best we can, and stick together while we work to overcome these latest challenges.

Even six or so weeks ago, none of us could have imagined that we would be where we are today.  We will not recover in six weeks what we have lost, but we will work to stabilize and then rebuild this great company.  As always, I appreciate the extraordinary contributions each of you make.  Thank you.

Ken


It looks like SCE's request is similar to PG&E's request.  If recovery of
undercollected procurement costs through a post-freeze surcharge means that
the rate freeze is guaranteed to December 31, 2001 or March 31, 2002, SCE's
proposal is not necessarily bad.  If we can get the CPUC to throw SCE and
PG&E a bone, while keeping the percentage of ultimate recovery uncertain,
this may solve a lot of concerns.  We would also like to see any recovery
managed over multiple years in order to keep the surcharge to a minimum.  The
surcharge will have a negative impact on our current book; however, this
impact may net out against any positive impacts for such a plan for both PG&E
and SCE.  Additionally, deferring and/or extending the recovery period for
the surcharge will mitigate negative impacts to our book.  Even though a
surcharge will cause higher delivery curves which may result in less
attractive bundled energy deals (depending on the customer's benchmark), we
will still be able to sell unbundled commodity only deals which will largely
depend on the post-freeze deregulated market structure.  We have implemented
the strategy to sell unbundled commodity only, when the regulatory risks
become too volatile and when the market structure supports demand for such a
product (e.g. SDG&E's service territory).

I don't necessarily think it is prudent to publicly oppose the utilities on
this issue.  I am not even sure we should tip our hand by saying anything
publicly on this issue.  We might want to maintain a poker face in public.
If we come out to strongly, then we might foreclose an opportunity to work
with the utilities.  If we come out in support, people might figure us out.
Whatever the outcome, it is important to preserve the rate freeze as it
exists today, which means a PX credit for DA customers.

Roger

---------------------- Forwarded by Roger Yang/SFO/EES on 10/09/2000 10:32 AM
---------------------------

Mona L Petrochko
10/06/2000 09:28 AM
To: West GA, Harry Kingerski@EES, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Laird
Dyer/SF/ECT@ECT, Michael McDonald@ECT, David Parquet@ECT, Roger Yang, Dennis
Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Mary Hain@Enron
cc:
Subject: Fwd: A. 99-01-034 SCE's Ex Parte Request for the
ImmediateSuspension, etc, 10-5-00

FYI.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES on 10/06/2000
07:26 AM ---------------------------

"Daniel Douglass" <douglass@ArterHadden.com> on 10/05/2000 06:39:04 PM
To: <JBarthrop@electric.com>, <mnelson@electric.com>,
<RSchlanert@electric.com>, <mpetroch@enron.com>, <susan_j_mara@enron.com>,
<counihan@greenmountain.com>, <athomas@newenergy.com>, <bchen@newenergy.com>,
<kmagruder@newpower.com>, <Jeff.Hanson@phaser.com>, <anchau@shellus.com>,
<andrew.madden@utility.com>, <ben.reyes@utility.com>,
<chris.king@utility.com>, <david.bayless@utility.com>
cc:
Subject: Fwd: A. 99-01-034 SCE's Ex Parte Request for the
ImmediateSuspension, etc, 10-5-00

Today, Edison filed?an ex parte request that the Commission declare  that an
unforeseen emergency
situation has arisen which merits the immediate  suspension as to SCE of the
ffective date of those portions of Decisions  99-10-057 and 00-03-058 (the
End of Rate Freeze Decisions) which do not permit  the recovery of a TRA
balance after the end of SCE,s rate freeze.? The  following is a direct quote
from the filing:
?
"Specifically, SCE asks for suspension of the effective date of application
to
SCE of Conclusions of Law 3 and 4 in D. 99-10-057, which read:
3. Carrying over balances related to the &PX lag8 or
other unrecovered  costs in the TRA or the TCBA violates
the rate freeze provisions of AB 1890.  Delaying the end of
the rate freeze in order to resolve pending  Commission
proceedings addressing costs incurred during the rate
freeze  contravenes AB 1890.
4. Sections 368(a) and 367(a) do not permit the
utilities to carry over  after the rate freeze those costs
incurred during the rate greeze. Exceptions  to the rate
freeze that are not specifically ennumerated in AB 1890
are  not lawful.
SCE also asks for suspension, as to SCE, of effective date of the second
bullet-pointed
subparagraph of Ordering Paragraph 2 in D. 99-10-057, which  reads:
2. The tariffs proposed by the advice letters shall not
be modified  except as required by this order, as follows:
* * * *
No utility may carry  over costs incurred during the rate
freeze period to the post )rate freeze  period,
notwithstanding the status of the Transition Revenue
Account  (TRA), relevant Commission proceedings, or
Power Exchange (PX) billings, as  set forth herein.
SCE also asks for suspension, as to SCE, of the effective date of  any
provisions of D. 00-03-058 which are consistent with the above  Conclusions
of Law
and Ordering Subpararagraph.
This request is based upon and hereby incorporates the Emergency  Petition
Of Southern California Edison Company (U 338-E) For Expedited  Modification Of
Decisions 99-10-057 And 00-03-058 and the supporting  declarations of Chris
Dominski and W. James Scilacci (collectively, the  &Emergency Petition8)
filed on
October 4, 2000."
?
Attached is a copy of the filing.
?
Dan
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2000 19:15:13 -0400
From: "Archer, Anthony V" <ARCHERAV@sce.com>
To: "'kpoole@adamsbroadwell.com'" <kpoole@adamsbroadwell.com>,
"'mdjoseph@adamsbroadwell.com'" <mdjoseph@adamsbroadwell.com>,
"'epoole@adplaw.com'" <epoole@adplaw.com>, "'mpa@aelaw.com'" <mpa@aelaw.com>,
"'jweil@aglet.org'" <jweil@aglet.org>, "'ronknecht@aol.com'"
<ronknecht@aol.com>, "'berry@apx.com'" <berry@apx.com>,"'ed@apx.com'"
<ed@apx.com>, "Daniel Douglass" <Douglass@ArterHadden.com>, "Freya Christian"
<FChristi@ArterHadden.com>, "'mgomez1@bart.gov'" <mgomez1@bart.gov>,
"'rschmidt@bartlewells.com'" <rschmidt@bartlewells.com>,
"'wbooth@booth-law.com'" <wbooth@booth-law.com>, "'blaising@braunlegal.com'"
<blaising@braunlegal.com>, "'rmccann@cal.net'" <rmccann@cal.net>,
"'glwaas@calpx.com'" <glwaas@calpx.com>, "'lgurick@calpx.com'"
<lgurick@calpx.com>, "'kmills@cfbf.com'" <kmills@cfbf.com>,
"'rliebert@cfbf.com'" <rliebert@cfbf.com>, "'theresa_mueller@ci.sf.ca.us'"
<theresa_mueller@ci.sf.ca.us>, "'honest@compuserve.com'"
<honest@compuserve.com>, "'mbrubaker@consultbai.com'"
<mbrubaker@consultbai.com>, "'ang@cpuc.ca.gov'" <ang@cpuc.ca.gov>,
"'fua@cpuc.ca.gov'" <fua@cpuc.ca.gov>, "'jjz@cpuc.ca.gov'" <jjz@cpuc.ca.gov>,
"'kim@cpuc.ca.gov'" <kim@cpuc.ca.gov>, "'kth@cpuc.ca.gov'" <kth@cpuc.ca.gov>,
"'mer@cpuc.ca.gov'" <mer@cpuc.ca.gov>, "'raw@cpuc.ca.gov'" <raw@cpuc.ca.gov>,
"'rtf@cpuc.ca.gov'" <rtf@cpuc.ca.gov>, "'ztc@cpuc.ca.gov'" <ztc@cpuc.ca.gov>,
"'patrickm@crossborderenergy.com'" <patrickm@crossborderenergy.com>,
"'pstohr@dbsr.com'" <pstohr@dbsr.com>, "'ad046@detroit.freenet.org'"
<ad046@detroit.freenet.org>, "'pat.williams@dhcmail.com'"
<pat.williams@dhcmail.com>, "'natutt@duanemorris.com'"
<natutt@duanemorris.com>, "'gtbl@dynegy.com'" <gtbl@dynegy.com>,
"'brbarkovich@earthlink.net'" <brbarkovich@earthlink.net>,
"'jsilva@edisonenterprises.com'" <jsilva@edisonenterprises.com>,
"'huse@eesconsulting.com'" <huse@eesconsulting.com>,
"'sdefrawi@efaches.navfac.navy.mil'" <sdefrawi@efaches.navfac.navy.mil>,
"'furutanj@efawest.navfac.navy.mil'" <furutanj@efawest.navfac.navy.mil>,
"'cmkehrein@ems-ca.com'" <cmkehrein@ems-ca.com>,
"'askaff@energy-law-group.com'" <askaff@energy-law-group.com>,
"'difellman@energy-law-group.com'" <difellman@energy-law-group.com>,
"'jtachera@energy.state.ca.us'" <jtachera@energy.state.ca.us>,
"'LKristov@energy.state.ca.us'" <LKristov@energy.state.ca.us>,
"'rtavares@energy.state.ca.us'" <rtavares@energy.state.ca.us>,
"'Slayman@energy.state.ca.us'" <Slayman@energy.state.ca.us>,
"'abb@eslawfirm.com'" <abb@eslawfirm.com>, "'jdh@eslawfirm.com'"
<jdh@eslawfirm.com>, "'jbennett@gmssr.com'" <jbennett@gmssr.com>,
"'jlondon@gralegal.com'" <jlondon@gralegal.com>,
"'rick.counihan@greenmountain.com'" <rick.counihan@greenmountain.com>,
"'ddavie@hesinet.com'" <ddavie@hesinet.com>, "'mhg@hetrading.com'"
<mhg@hetrading.com>, "'smoss@hooked.net'" <smoss@hooked.net>,
"'jeff@jbsenergy.com'" <jeff@jbsenergy.com>, "'jogg@jhenergy.com'"
<jogg@jhenergy.com>, "'ewo@jmbm.com'" <ewo@jmbm.com>,
"'napedersen@jonesday.com'" <napedersen@jonesday.com>, "'dws@keywaycorp.com'"
<dws@keywaycorp.com>, "'karen@klindh.com'" <karen@klindh.com>,
"'bloomje@la.whitecase.com'" <bloomje@la.whitecase.com>,
"'btenney@landuselaw.com'" <btenney@landuselaw.com>, "'chilen@llgm.com'"
<chilen@llgm.com>, "'jleslie@luce.com'" <jleslie@luce.com>,
"'randy_britt@mayco.com'" <randy_britt@mayco.com>, "'chrism@mid.org'"
<chrism@mid.org>, "'phanschen@mofo.com'" <phanschen@mofo.com>,
"'rbw@mrwassoc.com'" <rbw@mrwassoc.com>, "'athomas@newenergy.com'"
<athomas@newenergy.com>, "'derkp@newsdata.com'" <derkp@newsdata.com>,
"'ell5@pge.com'" <ell5@pge.com>, "'j3m9@pge.com'" <j3m9@pge.com>,
"'jyf1@pge.com'" <jyf1@pge.com>, "'whe1@pge.com'" <whe1@pge.com>,
"'jbarthrop@powersavers.com'" <jbarthrop@powersavers.com>,
"'keith-sappenfield@reliantenergy.com'"
<keith-sappenfield@reliantenergy.com>, "'pjmuller@ricochet.net'"
<pjmuller@ricochet.net>, "'melanie_gillette@rmiinc.com'"
<melanie_gillette@rmiinc.com>, "'jbushee@sablaw.com'" <jbushee@sablaw.com>,
"'kmccrea@sablaw.com'" <kmccrea@sablaw.com>, "'cohnap@sce.com'"
<cohnap@sce.com>, "'costac@sce.com'" <costac@sce.com>, "'fosterbc@sce.com'"
<fosterbc@sce.com>, "'lehrerjm@sce.com'" <lehrerjm@sce.com>,
"'dbb@sdcity.sannet.gov'" <dbb@sdcity.sannet.gov>, "'kmelville@sempra.com'"
<kmelville@sempra.com>, "'LVanWagenen@sempra.com'" <LVanWagenen@sempra.com>,
"'anchau@shellus.com'" <anchau@shellus.com>, "'dmarcus@slip.net'"
<dmarcus@slip.net>, "'aorchard@smud.org'" <aorchard@smud.org>,
"'thaines@smud.org'" <thaines@smud.org>, "'bfinkelstein@turn.org'"
<bfinkelstein@turn.org>
Cc: "Cohn, Ann" <Ann.Cohn@sce.com>,"Fox, Beth" <Beth.Fox@sce.com>, "Lehrer,
James" <James.Lehrer@sce.com>, "Chadsey, Linda" <Linda.Chadsey@sce.com>,
"Monalisa, Dina" <MONALID@sce.com>, "Simpson, Mary C" <SIMPSOMC@sce.com>
Subject: A. 99-01-034 SCE's Ex Parte Request for the ImmediateSuspension,
etc, 10-5-00
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_1941F0B8.89E8C083"

 <<SCE's Ex Parte Request For Suspension, Etc.>>

 Attached is SCE's Ex Parte Request For The Immediate Suspension Of
The Effective Date of Portions of D.99-10-057 and D.00-03-058 Relating To
The Post Rate Freeze Recovery Of The TRA Balance.

 This document was filed and served today on all parties of record in
A. 99-01-034, et. al., (PTR)

 Thank you,
Anthony V. Archer
So. Cal. Edison's Legal  Dept.
Tele: 626 302-3104
Pax:: 2-3104
Fax:: 2-2304
Suite 315

 - 10-5-0.PDF


Sandi,

Do you have a complete contract for the Apache purchase under the Tenaska IV
deal?  Apache is billing us a rate that is $.11 below the commodity rate
stated on page 22 in the original contract.  In the documents I have, I can't
find a reason for the adjustment.  I may be missing an amendment or
something.  I thought that you may have a complete set of documents and could
help me out.

Daren


I had heard that the big E bought out the minority investors last summer.
Hadn't seen this coming.  So what's next for Azurix?


Several changes have been made to Stack Manager and the website. These changes are outlined below and will be visible by all as of Monday September 3, 2001.

Stack Manager Changes

Activate/Inactivate Stack - This functionality allows the trader to pull a product's prices from the website without suspending the product. If the Top of Stack limit order functionality is activated for a particular product this should be used to pull the stack prices from the website without pulling the entire product; therefore, if there are top of stack limit orders against the product they will remain visible and transactable on the website.

If a product's stack is inactivated the font for that product will be grayed out in stack manager. If the stack is active it will appear in black font.

To use this feature, select the product, right click and choose "Inactivate Stack". When you are ready to reactivate your prices, select the same product, right click again and choose "Activate Stack". There are also icons on the tool bar at the top of your screen which will Activate/Inactivate the stack of the highlighted product. See screen shot below for the icons.

Changes to Product Properties - Currently when modifications are made to certain properties within the product properties screen, the product will be suspended and pulled from the website. Now instead of being suspended, the product's stack will become inactive. Once the changes have been made and saved to the properties of a product simply click the Activate Stack icon as discussed above.

Website Change

Restrictions on Top of Stack orders - If Top of Stack limit orders are allowed on a product, but the trader is not showing both a bid and offer, limit orders will not be able to be placed on that product.

If you have any questions please call me at 31787. Thanks.

Savita

<Embedded Paintbrush Picture>


Chip,

This e-mail confirms the info that we talked about this morning:

1)  We found the old interruptible transport contract that is referenced in the firm storage agreement.  It is a maximum rate transport contract that allows discounting of transport rates.  I do not know what the maximum transport rate is for Bridgeline, but it is probably one rate for the entire pipeline.  No active discounts were found in ENA's records.  With the pipeline's cooperation, however, new discounts can be negotiated.
2)  Under ENA's firm storage agreement, you must withdraw it from storage at the Storage Delivery/Redelivery Point which is defined as the interconnect between the storage field and Bridgeline Pipeline System.  This means that some sort of transportation agreement on Bridgeline must be used if ENA does not sell the inventory in place.
3)  Chris is making some preliminary calls to gauge the market interest for purchasing ENA's storage inventory.  So far he has not received much positive feedback.  As we discussed before, using an interruptible transport contract puts the shipper at risk that the gas will show up everyday and be available for sale to third parties.  The price ENA receives from purchasers will most likely be discounted for this IT transport risk.

Good luck with the meeting,
Ruth

-----Original Message-----
From: Schneider, Chip
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 2:41 PM
To: Gray, Barbara N.; Kelly, Neil; Bartlett, Jeff; Sharp, Greg
Cc: Concannon, Ruth; Coffey Jr., Jim; Thompkins, Jason; Ellenberg, Mark
Subject: Bridgeline Storage Company, LLC

I've made a few changes.  I've heard from Greg and OpCo is on-board.

One remaining question is whether we go in offering to pay demand charges for the total 2.5Bcf or only the 1.9+Bcf actually used during this period, given that the gas was trapped.  The ratable amount is approximately $100k lower than the $575k in the letter.  If for no other reason, from a negotiating perspective I believe we should go in with the lower number.  Mark, do you have a view on this?  If our legal analysis is clearly based on demand charges at the maximum volume, we probably should stay with the $575k.


ARTICLE X.  PERFORMANCE GUARANTEES AND ACCEPTANCE

10.1   Performance Guarantees. Seller guarantees that each Unit will meet the
Performance Standards for Electrical Output, Efficiency, Water Consumption,
Noise and Emissions as set forth in Section 10.2, when Performance Tests are
conducted in accordance with the Performance Test Procedures.

10.2  Performance Standards. Each Unit shall meet Performance Standards as
described in this Article and as set forth in the following table below in
order to achieve Acceptance:

	2MW Power Plants	2.4MW Power Plants	3.0 MW Power Plants
Electrical Output, kW	2000 kW	2400 kW
Heat Rate (LVH)	48%	48%
Water Consumption	600 gal/h	620 gal/h
Sound level	65 dB(A) at 100 feet	65 dB(A) at 100 feet
Emissions
Nox	<1 ppmv	<1 ppmv
SOx	<0.1 ppmv	<0.1 ppmv
CO	<20 ppmv	<20 ppmv
VOC	<20 ppmv	<20 ppmv
Particulates	<100 mg/m3	<100 mg/m3

10.2.1   Heat Rate Guarantee.  Seller guarantees that the Heat Rate as
measured for each of the Units
as demonstrated during the Performance Test, shall be __BTU/kWh. In the event
the Heat Rate exceeds the Minimum Heat Rate Guarantee, Seller shall take all
necessary actions to correct, retest the deficient Unit and cause the
deficient Unit to meet the Minimum Heat Rate Guarantee.  Failure to meet the
Heat Rate Guarantee shall prevent Acceptance, unless Purchaser explicitly
waives this guarantee in writing.

10.3.2   Electrical Output Guarantee.  Seller guarantees that the Electrical
Output of each Unit as demonstrated in the  most recent Performance Test
shall be equal or greater than 2000 kW (for a 2.0 MW Unit), 2400 kW (for a
2.4 MW) Unit, and 3000kW (for a 3.0 MW Unit). [Is this a net number?  Where
is it measured?]

10.3.3   Emissions Guarantee. Seller guarantees that the emissions of the
[Unit] for the above listed categories when the [Unit] is operated
[conditions?]

10.3.4   Water Consumption Guarantee.

10.3.5 [Sound Guarantee. Seller guarantees that the near field average
A-weighted sound pressure levels of the [Unit?  Facility?] shall not exceed
65dB(a) 9referenced to 20 micropascals) when measured during the Performance
Test at one and a half (1.5) meters above the ground level and one (1) meter
from the surface of the Equipment.]

10.3.6 Reliability.

10.4    Remedy for Failures to Meet Performance Guarantees.  Except as
specified in Section 10._] the failure to achieve the Performance Guarantees
by the Acceptance Deadline [to be defined] shall constitute a default under
this Agreement, and Purchaser shall have the remedies specified in Article [].

10.5   Testing.

10.5.1   Notice of Installation Completion; Conducting Tests. Seller shall
deliver Notice to Purchaser that a Unit has achieved Installation Completion
so that the Unit is ready to be tested.  Within [fourteen (14) days] of
receipt of this Notice, Purchaser shall perform the Performance Tests in
accordance with the Performance Test Procedure; however, Purchaser shall not
be required to conduct Performance Tests prior to [] days from the Delivery
Date, or date of actual delivery, whichever is latest. Purchaser shall give
Seller five (5) days notice of the time of the Performance Tests. Seller
shall be present or to have a representative present at the Performance
Tests, and shall provide technical advice during the tests; however,
Purchaser may at its option conduct the test without Seller, assuming notice
was properly given in accordance with this section.

10.5.2   Test Results. Performance Tests shall be conducted on a unit-by-unit
basis. Upon the completion of each Performance Test Purchaser will issue a
Performance Test Certificate setting forth the results achieved during such
test.  In the case of multiple Performance Tests on a Unit, performance shall
be measured by the most recent Performance Test.

10.5.3   Costs of  Retests.  If one or more additional Acceptance Tests are
required doe to the failure of a Unit to pass its Acceptance Test, Seller
will bear the additional costs (if any) incurred by Purchaser [in excess of
those costs normally associated with operating the Unit]. Such additional
costs may include, but not be limited to, cost of testing, instrumentation,
fuel, consumable spare parts, and additional personnel required to conduct
the tests.

10.6   Acceptance.  Upon the successful completion of the Performance Test
for a Unit, Seller shall submit a Performance Test Certificate to Purchaser
indicating that a Unit has achieved the Performance Standards and it ready
for Acceptance.  Purchaser shall within ten  (10) days of receipt of such
Performance Test Certificate, either sign such certificate acknowledging
concurrence or reject such certificate specifically stating the reasons for
such rejection. Acceptance for each Unit (and its associated Equipment) shall
occur upon the issuance of the Performance Test Certificate by Purchaser as a
result of the Unit having met the Performance Guarantees.  Acceptance of the
each Unit to be installed in a Facility shall occur when all of the following
have occurred:

(a) the issuance of a Performance Test Certificate by Purchaser as a result
of a Performance Test indicating that the final Unit has met the Performance
Standards;

(b) all completion of training  and the delivery of O & M Manuals and special
tools required hereunder shall have occurred;

(c) Seller has delivered to Purchaser a waiver of liens in form as shown in
Exhibit-S that have been or could have been placed upon the Equipment and
that there are no outstanding claims of Seller or any Vendor with respect to
the Equipment for that particular Facility;

(d) all of the Units in the Facility have achieved Installation Completion.
[and there are no punch list items remaining to be completed.]

10.7 Obligation to Improve Performance.  If the Performance Test should
indicate that a Unit has met the Specific Performance Guarantees but not the
Guaranteed Performance Criteria, then for a period of ninety (90) days
following the Performance Test Seller shall have the obligation to use
reasonable efforts to improve performance so that the Guaranteed  Performance
Criteria are met. Such efforts shall be at Seller,s sole cost and risk.
Performance Tests shall be conducted in accordance with this Article.

10.8    Reduced Purchase Amount for Failing to Meet Guaranteed Performance
Levels.  Should the Performance Test of a Unit demonstrate that the Unit has
met the Performance Standards except for the Electrical Output Performance
Standard, the Purchase Amount related to that Unit shall be reduced by the
percent by which the Unit fails to meet the Power Output/kW Performance
Standard, so long as the Unit has achieved ninety percent of the guaranteed
level. Seller shall within 30 days refund any prior payment received for the
Unit in excess of the reduced Purchase Amount.


Just talked to Debbie and she told me about the 2 week waiting period after the proceeding you are trying to get waived.  However it turns out, the end is in sight.  Everyone is still keeping you, Alina, Kim and Chad in their thoughts and prayers.  We can't wait to meet Alina in person, hopefully sometime shortly after the first of the year you can bring her up.  If she needs time to get acclimated before encountering downtown Houston and meeting new people we will understand.  I hope your various ailments are healed, or at least getting better.  Debbie talks to your Mom and Kim periodically, but we enjoy your e-mails when you get a chance.  Hang in there and you will soon be back telling many stories of your adventure.  --  Teb


Eric,
As we discussed, with ENSR's assistance I have developed a projected timeline for developing the FERC required F-1 Exhibit (12 part Resource Reports to satisfy the NEPA requirement) in sufficient detail to meet the FERC filing requirements and expedite the processing of the environmental portion of the application.  The aggressive timeline assumes that the expedited FERC "Collaborative Approach" will be implemented throughout the processing of the application.  Even with the "Collaborative Approach" and all of the upfront work done with the environmental community to streamline the processing, the schedule is very, very optimistic and assumes that all conflicting issues will be resolved quickly and the processing continue.

I have requested that Jon Schmidt (ENSR) begin working on a detailed cost estimate, by quarters in two phases.  The first part of the estimate would be to project the environmental cost, by quarters of preparing the 12 Resource Reports (including the necessary field work) that would get Sun Devil to an FERC filing in the first quarter of 2002 that would not be rejected.  The second component of the cost estimate would be to complete the field work and permitting phases during the processing of the application.  This includes participating in FERC scoping meetings and agency meetings as required.  This would include assisting the third party environmental contractor in working on the EIS to expedite the writing as needed.  It would also include mitigation packages to satisfy agency requirements.  The third and final component would be to budget for a Third Party Environmental Contractor to write the EIS document during the time that the field work is being developed and to process the same with the FERC Staff.  Once we get the "White Paper" Fatal Flaw analysis that ENSR is preparing for this project we will have enough information along with the budget to get us to the FERC filing to make some quantifiable decisions on moving forward when comparing those to the commercial advantages that you are developing.

If you have any questions, please give me a call.  John Shafer