What do I need to do?  Should I end the exitsting contracts effective
4/30/00 and create new ones effective 5/1/00?  Does Marlene need to create a
new type of FT rate service to make these contracts appear different ( maybe
that has already been done)?

Marlene Hilliard
05/03/2000 05:01 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Pinion/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: National Fuel Says They Are Pathed Model Type

I was not aware ot the Sonat Style.  In that case, an IT request is not
necessary.

Marlene Hilliard
---------------------- Forwarded by Marlene Hilliard/HOU/ECT on 05/03/2000
04:58 PM ---------------------------

Richard Pinion
05/03/2000 04:48 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Beverly Beaty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marlene Hilliard/HOU/ECT@ect, Diane E
Niestrath/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Greif/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: National Fuel Says They Are Pathed Model Type

I have been speaking with Sylvia Campos on this.  Originally they wanted to
do this via IT request which I thought would cause some problems. Since then
they changed their minds and decided to so it Sonat style and merely create a
different service type (so as not to change historically).  To my
recollection that is the way that they were going and supposedly it was
cleared with Connie Sutton.  So this reversal does somewhat surprise me.

RP

Chris Germany
05/03/2000 02:36 PM
To: Richard Pinion/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marlene Hilliard/HOU/ECT@ect
cc: Beverly Beaty/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: National Fuel Says They Are Pathed Model Type

Richard, according to Marlene, she needs to put in an IT request to change
the National Fuel contracts from non-pathed to pathed.  Does this sound
correct to you?

Please let me know.
chris
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 05/03/2000 02:28
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Beverly Beaty                           05/03/2000 02:14 PM

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: National Fuel Says They Are Pathed Model Type

Per our conversation....

Bev
---------------------- Forwarded by Beverly Beaty/HOU/ECT on 05/03/2000 02:14
PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Donna Greif                           04/21/2000 12:44 PM

To: Richard Pinion/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Beverly Beaty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane E Niestrath/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: National Fuel Says They Are Pathed Model Type

Richard,

I trust you're on top of this.....let me know if you'd like my help!

Thanks!

dg

From: Diane E Niestrath on 04/19/2000 06:23 PM
To: Donna Greif/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Pinion/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Dave Nommensen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beverly Beaty/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: National Fuel Says They Are Pathed Model Type

DG & RP,

National Fuel says they are 100% using the GISB pathed model type.  Our Unify
noms are non-pathed.

1) Can you look at the National Fuel invoice and verify that the accounting
area will still work effortlessly if we change Unify to pathed.
2) If we elect to change Unify's model type to pathed, let's do it just like
we did Southern Natural.  And, I would like this done for May 1 noms in
production and have the Scheduler (Beverly?) path in this new model type
manner.  We are suppose to be getting scheduled quantities in production
starting tomorrow, unless ECOM prevents it, so you'll be able to see what the
pipe expects in the pathed model type.
3) If we elect to NOT change Unify's model type to pathed, I guess we can't
ever edi this pipe unless I can figure out some clever way to join up the
noms.

Beverly, Do you think it would be a problem to start entering the upstream
k's and downstream k's when you path in Unify.  The pipe told me this is
mandatory data unless the nom is involved in the Appalachian area.  If it is
a problem, don't do, I don't want to slow you down since you have to enter
the data twice today.  If and when we do edi, we'll need the up/down k's
entered at that time.

Thanks, Diane
x3-9931

==============================================================================
=======================
Email excerpt between Diane (in magenta) and Chris Zachary in IT Dptmt at
National Fuel Gas Supply Corp (in blue) ===>

>> 3) Please confirm that your model type is always "P" pathed from noms all
the
>> way down to invoices.

    Our model type is always "P" for pathed.


I think it would be a good idea to get together.  I would include Eric Thode
as he has been living through the PR battles on a daily basis.

James D Steffes
05/30/2001 08:31 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Michael Terraso/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Kelly
Kimberly/Enron Communications@Enron Communications

Subject: Bahamas LNG

Steve --

In a discussion today with Mike, Kelly, etc., it was apparent that the Public
Affairs team viewed the Bahamas LNG transaction quite cautiously.  Given the
recent issues power plant development has had in Florida (big political
fights that are going the wrong way), I was wondering if it made sense to
bring together a meeting of all of Public Affairs and the deal team to
analyze the implications of our development plans.  My primary worry is that
P/L under water could have severe ecological implications that are not being
internalized into the transaction.

I would like to try and arrange a meeting to (1) ensure Public Affairs
coordination and (2) understand the deal impacts better.

Please advise if I'm worrying for no good reason.

Jim


Shirley

Please, set up a phone interview with this guy.
The usual suspects: Zimin, Alex, Bob.

Vince

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Sen-Hao Lai" <slai@nc.rr.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Sen-Hao+20Lai+22+20+3Cslai+40nc+2Err+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Monday, July 23, 2001 3:02 PM
To:	vkamins@enron.com
Subject:	sen's resume

resume attached
 - Sen's Resume.doc


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Turner, Nancy
Sent:	Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:01 AM
To:	Allen, Phillip K.; Grigsby, Mike; Gaskill, Chris; Presto, Kevin M.
Cc:	Walsh, Kristin; Whitman, Britt; Holman, Kelly
Subject:	El Paso Update (8/29)

Here is the latest....
Smart pigging was completed on line #1100 on August 17th
This data has neither been analyzed nor submitted to OPS for review
OPS must review this data before the line can come back up
Therefore, we now do not expect #1110 to come online until mid September/early October
September 1st was the projected date that El Paso submitted to the OPS to have #1100 back on line

As additional information is received it will be forwarded.   Please contact me at x51623 or Kristin Walsh at x39510 if you have any questions.

Nancy Turner
Enron Americas - Houston, TX
Phone: (713) 345-1623
Fax: (713) 345-7297
nancy.turner@enron.com


John,

george.hopley@enron.com

Vince

"John Adamiak" <john@pgsenergy.com> on 11/21/2000 09:26:00 AM
To: <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Re: PGS On-site Derivatives/Electric Power Training

Vince,

Thank you.  Do you happen to know his email address?

John

----- Original Message -----
From: <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
To: John Adamiak - President <john@pgsenergy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 10:00 AM
Subject: Re: PGS On-site Derivatives/Electric Power Training

>
> John,
>
> Please, contact George Hopley at Enron.    (713) 853-9463
>
> Vince
>
>
>
>
>
>
> John Adamiak - President <john@pgsenergy.com> on 11/17/2000 01:49:30 PM
>
> Please respond to John Adamiak - President <john@pgsenergy.com>
>
> To:   <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
> cc:
> Subject:  PGS On-site Derivatives/Electric Power Training
>
>
> Do you know of anyone who could benefit from on-site
> training in energy derivatives or electric power trading during
> the coming twelve months?   www.pgsenergy.com
>
> John Adamiak
> PGS Energy Training
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


We have received several responses to Sidney's letter to shareholders, both
positive and negative.   A few shareholders indicated that copies of their
response would be sent to board members.  We are very interested in all
letters received from our shareholders and would appreciate it if you would
please forward to us any letters that you receive.   We prefer that you not
respond to any letter that you may receive relative to this matter as we
are collecting all letters and will respond to them as appropriate.   If
you have any questions, please contact me.  Thanks for your help.

Alecia DeCoudreaux


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 07/18/2001
07:15 AM ---------------------------
From: Jeff Dasovich on 07/17/2001 07:31 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich

To: skean@enron.com, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Harry
Kingerski/Enron@EnronXGate, Leslie Lawner/Enron@EnronXGate, Michael
Tribolet/ENRON@enronXgate, Kristin Walsh/Enron@EnronXGate, Karen
Denne/Enron@EnronXGate, mpalmer@enron.com, Janel Guerrero/Enron@EnronXGate,
Paul Kaufman/Enron@EnronXGate, Susan M Landwehr/Enron@EnronXGate, Linda
Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: California Update--0717.01

What people know:

Hertzberg (et al's) bill (82XX)was heard in an "informational" hearing today
and still sits in the Assembly Energy Committee.  It will be heard again
tomorrow (perhaps beginning at 10 AM) , at which time parties will have a
chance to support/oppose and ask for amendments.  Most, including us, oppose
unless significantly amended.
The Wright (D) -Richman (R) bill (83XX)was heard in an "informational"
hearing today and still sits in the Assembly Energy Committee.  It will be
heard again tomorrow, at which time parties will have a chance to
support/oppose and ask for amendments.  From our perspective, this is the
best bill out there yet, though it still has serious problems---it isn't
available electronically yet, but should be tomorrow, and I'll distribute
then.  The chances of the joint D-R bill being successful are slim, however,
since it's up against the Speakers competing bill.  There is talk that the
Speaker will try to negotiate with Wright/Richman tonight and include any
agreement in his bill (82XX).
The original version of the Governor's MOU bill sits in the Senate.  Most
believe that Burton will put it up for a vote this week and it will fail.
The Senate's version of the MOU (Sher-Peace-Kuehl) (78XX)came out today.  It
will likely be heard in the committee tomorrow or the next day.  Notably, it
kills Direct Access completely and makes Edison shareholders responsible for
that portion of Edison's debt owed to suppliers.  In short, a very bad bill.
Burton's 18XX, which would de-link the bond issuance (to pay back the General
Fund) from the DWR contracts is likely to pass the Senate tomorrow or the
next day.  Many--including Enron--support the bill (though we are supporting
it behind the scenes).

What people don't know:
Whether there's the time or the will in the Assembly and Senate to achieve by
Friday a single, comprehensive bill that can be sent to the governor for his
signature.
Whether the Legislature would postpone its month-long recess if the
Legislature hasn't finished a bill by Friday (most folks think they will not
postpone).
Whether it's true that, irrespective of the energy issue, the Legislature
will fail to get the budget completed by Friday and therefore have to
postpone their recess anyway, in which case they might continue to work on
the energy legislation at the same time.

Odds-makers still say it's better than 50-50 that the Legislature does not
get the Edison bills done by Friday and leaves on on its 30-day vacation.

Best,
Jeff

Sacramento is one goofy place.


Per my voice mail, attached are replacement changes for paragraph 2 of
confirms for the referenced products.  SS


Paulette,

It's not Enron's intention to have Calp fund the OPT 60 payment. Enron
would like for Calp to release the capacity in Enron's name during the
winter period, and this would send the bills directly to Enron and
eliminate funding by Calp and reimbursement of Enron to Calp. We can look
at this again next winter. I'm not sure why there was a delayed payment
once Calp gave Enron the bill a month ago. I'll ask Mark Feldman about wire
transfers.

Thanks again for your patience.

pheuer@EdisonMission.Com on 03/23/2000 05:45:18 PM

To:   Joan.Veselack@enron.com
cc:   rbakke@EdisonMission.Com, Dick.Jenkins@enron.com,
      Robin.Barbe@enron.com, Chris.Germany@enron.com,
      Mark.Feldman@enron.com, Victor.Lamadrid@enron.com,
      Katherine.L.Kelly@enron.com

Subject:  Re: Calp Payments

Joan,

The deal with CES was that the invoice would be paid upon receipt.  It was
never
CALP's intent to fund the OPT 60 payment.  As requested, I will faxed
February's
bill to Robin.  Since the January payment is so late, could you have
January and
February's payments wire transferred to CALP's account?

Thanks!

Paulette

Joan.Veselack@enron.com on 03/23/2000 06:08:57 PM

To:   Roman Bakke/EME@EME, Paulette Heuer/EME@EME
cc:   Dick.Jenkins@enron.com, Robin.Barbe@enron.com,
Chris.Germany@enron.com,
      Mark.Feldman@enron.com, Victor.Lamadrid@enron.com,
      Katherine.L.Kelly@enron.com

Subject:  Calp Payments

Roman and Paulette,

Sorry for the delay. January's check will be sent out tomorrow, Friday
March 24th. As soon as Mark Feldman (Enron payment God) receives February's
bill, he can pay this one too.

Thank you for your patience during this transition.


can't say, but you can connect the dots... Although I got a media call this morning from someone who wanted to know if this related to our relationship with the Republican Party?!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 10:24 AM
To:	Denne, Karen
Subject:	RE: Press Release and Statement: Ene Announces SEC Request, Pledges Cooperation

Forgive my ignorance, but I'm assuming that "related party transactions" refers to the Fastow deals?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Denne, Karen
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 9:10 AM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff; Mara, Susan
Subject:	FW: Press Release and Statement: Ene Announces SEC Request, Pledges Cooperation

fyi...

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Philipp, Meredith
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 9:03 AM
To:	Nord, Sue
Cc:	Shapiro, Richard; Palmer, Mark A. (PR); Denne, Karen
Subject:	Press Release and Statement: Ene Announces SEC Request, Pledges Cooperation

Sue-
FYI- we issued the attached release this morning. I know our govt affairs teams will have lots of questions and will probably be asked several questions.  Unfortunately, given the legal nature of this inquiry, we cannot say anything more than this at this time.  We are asking our folks not to engage in conversations or opinion related discussions about this.  Also, Ken Lay will be discussing this at an employee meeting tomorrow morning.  It would be a good idea for everyone to tune in, if possible (or review the playback later in the day.)

I am also attaching a brief INTERNAL Q&A about the SEC request- just to give a little more information.

Thanks-
Meredith

 << File: 70-LJM final ltr.pdf >>  	 << File: LJMmediaQA.doc >>


Janette Elbertson
Enron Wholesale Services
Legal Department
Telephone:  (713) 853-7906
Fax:  (713) 646-2600
e-mail:  janette.elbertson@enron.com


Daren,

I have no problem sticking around with the group, it is a compliment and I am glad that you all appreciate what I have been able to contribute to the group.  I just want your opinion on something.

One of my many goals while a part of the analyst program is to become a  senior analyst or third year analyst.  It is a promotion that also brings with it a bit of a pay increase.  In no way do I want to imply greed, or that I will only stay for money, but if in your opinion I may be deserving of this, then maybe we could run it by Bob or the program, or whoever is in control of that.

Just a thought, let me know what you think.

Mike


This communication is intended for signatories of the Comprehensive
Settlement Agreement, and is confidential under Rule 51 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure.  Please do not forward this e-mail to other
parties.

During a meeting with Comm. Bilas today, he confirmed what we had been
previously advised, namely:  He did not communicate with any of his
colleagues regarding the PD, he is very disappointed at the limited scope of
the PD, and knows it does not go as far as it should; he would support an
alternate offered by another commission which adopted more or all of the
CSA.  He strongly urges parties to take their concerns about the PD to the
other commissioners.  He acknowledges it will be a tough sell.  However, he
does not have any communication from the Democratic commissioners on this
issue either way, so he cannot predict their reaction with any certainty.
The main reason for his issuance of the PD in this form appears to be that
he felt that a more aggressive PD issued by a Wilson appointee would attract
attacks simply because it was not offered by the new commissioner.

Additional data points:  Other key CPUC staff with access to President Lynch
that I spoke with today urged us to meet with her, and to emphasize that the
CSA does not result in a reduction in CPUC jurisdiction or regulatory
control (like AB 1890 did) and to take our best shot at convincing her and
Comm. Wood that customers, including core customers, may far much worse
under the interim than under the CSA (particularly in view of the interstate
capacity issues--as described by Mark Pocta of ORA on our recent conf.
call).  In addition, a fourth Commissioner (who will be around to vote next
year) suggested similar tactics and offered support for such an effort.

In light of this information, I suggest that we proceed to issue the letter
as planned, and ask that all parties, including SoCalGas, quickly review the
next draft to see if they can sign on.  We would like to have as many of the
CSA signatories as possible on the letter.  I hope to get the new draft out
today or early tomorrow.  Please respond by COB Thursday or early on Friday.

Next, I have asked for a meeting with Pres. Lynch.  I would like other
parties to attend as well (or schedule their own meetings).  As soon as I
get a date, I will advise.

Bottom line:  We urge parties to sign the letter and to file comments
supporting adoption of the CSA.  We need to meet with Lynch, and until and
unless we get a firm "no", we should not assume the settlement is dead.  We
should file comments on the PD on Monday which at least list our objections
to the PD and open the door for discussions on how to revive the CSA.

If possible, we will try to arrange a conference call on Friday.
Please call if you have any questions.

Mike Day


sounds good.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nicolay, Christi L.
Sent:	Tuesday, August 21, 2001 6:18 PM
To:	Steffes, James D.; Shapiro, Richard; Robertson, Linda; Novosel, Sarah; Alvarez, Ray; Fulton, Donna; Roan, Michael; Maurer, Luiz; Connor, Joe; Montovano, Steve; Migden, Janine; Stroup, Kerry; Mara, Susan; Comnes, Alan; Walton, Steve; Hoatson, Tom; Fromer, Howard; Allegretti, Daniel; Guerrero, Janel; Perrino, Dave; Staines, Dan; Dadson, Aleck
Subject:	RTOs and Market Monitoring

The structure of an independent market monitor is arising in the RTO proceedings.  These are some thoughts:

Market monitor should have the ability to monitor the activities of the RTO and the markets.  For example, if the RTO is a transco, it is appropriate for the MM to review whether the RTO is doing something potentially problematic in planning, ATC calcs, etc.
MM should only have the ability to recommend changes to market structure, possible penalties, etc.  MM should not have the ability to issue a penalty to any one without first going to FERC.  It is possible that the MM could ask for FERC pre-approval to issue "penalties" or remedies for certain conduct.  The example that comes to mind is the $1000 price cap in PJM.  It has been approved at FERC and if someone bids above it, the MM could reduce the bid to $1000 without going to FERC again.
MM has no authority that FERC does not have.  (I have heard some (outside of Enron) people state that the MM should have authority to do things that FERC could not do.)
Market participants should always retain their right to go to FERC before providing documents in response to an MM request and should retain right to go to FERC even if there is an arbitration clause (should not be required to agree to binding arbitration).
Ultimately, FERC staff could provide the MM function.

Let me know any comments ASAP please (since I have comments due on this Friday for the SE RTO).  Thanks.


Vince...

can you believe it?

- - - Mike
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT on 07/31/2000
10:13 AM ---------------------------

"Edward Krapels" <ekrapels@esaibos.com> on 07/31/2000 08:57:56 AM
Please respond to <ekrapels@esaibos.com>
To: <ekrapels@esaibos.com>
cc:
Subject: Daily Natural Gas Price Outlook

Today,s ESAI Daily Natural Gas Price Outlook will be delayed due to
unexpected illness of the weather forecaster. We will post our analysis as
soon as we gather all the necessary information.


Beth Apollo has recently joined the team and Brenda Herod has recently
married.  February and March were gone before I could get organized enough to
try to celebrate both of these occasions.  In honor of Beth's arrival and
Brenda's marriage, I hope that you can join David and me for drinks and
appetizers at our house on Saturday, May 5, followed by dinner at Champions
Golf Club.  Please include your spouse or a guest, and know that we will also
be happy to just have you attend.  Let me know if that date will work for
you.


Attached is the current form of the assignment agreement.  I'm awaiting final
approval from Finance, but I think we should get this in front of GE.  Ben,
do you or Chris want to handle this, or shall I?

Kay


Andy,

 Please assign a user name to Randy Gay.

Thank you,

Phillip


Thanks for your help on this.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gomez, Julie
Sent:	Thursday, March 22, 2001 3:35 PM
To:	Lavorato, John; Calger, Christopher; Kitchen, Louise
Subject:	Kern Expansion

FYI Folks-

The Kern River expansion that we backed out of (the 15 year stuff) is going to be 900,000 MMBtu/d.  As you can see a large number of the shippers stayed in the process, and are now bound to the pipe if it gets built!!

There will be a press release on this tomorrow...

Julie  :-)


Please take the form of the Cayuga confid agreement, and substitute this name.

This is CA day!

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/22/2000 12:48
PM ---------------------------

Fred Mitro@ECT
12/22/2000 12:03 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: NRG-CA

Kay:

I talked with NRG (San Diego) regarding the CA for the 7EA purchase.

The NRG entity that will be executing the CA is:

 NRG Development Co., Inc.
 750 B Street
 San Diego, CA  92101
 Attention:  Mr. Scott Magie

If asked, I will relay to Scott that the form of the Agreement was based on
Enron's form utilized in all turbine transaction CA's.

hohohow's the egg flowing today on 38?

Fred


Start Date: 4/23/01; HourAhead hour: 11;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042311.txt


Actually, bluebonnets bloom for a short time, maybe three week early in the
Houston Spring, in March, after heavy Spring rains have gone on for a bit,
and when the temperature is in the 60's to 70's.  They would get fried and
fade in the heat of a Houston summer.  However, I don't know the temperatures
and rain condition of your summers, and what time of your year would
replicate those conditions.


---------------------- Forwarded by Christopher Watts/NA/Enron on 04/05/2001
05:29 PM ---------------------------

"Chris Watts" <cwatts3@houston.rr.com> on 04/05/2001 03:59:06 PM
To: <christopher.watts@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Fw: power trading: EXELON TO PUSH MARKETING, TRADING    COMED PARENT
WILL LEVERAGE POWER ASSETS

----- Original Message -----
From: <djcustomclips@djinteractive.com>
To: <276682@sm4.texas.rr.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 7:32 AM
Subject: power trading: EXELON TO PUSH MARKETING, TRADING COMED PARENT WILL
LEVERAGE POWER ASSETS

> Business
> EXELON TO PUSH MARKETING, TRADING
> COMED PARENT WILL LEVERAGE POWER ASSETS
> Melita Marie Garza, Tribune staff reporter
>
> 04/05/2001
> Chicago Tribune
> North Final
> ; N
> 3
> (Copyright 2001 by the Chicago Tribune)
>
>    Moving to capitalize on its rapidly growing nuclear power
> capabilities, Chicago-based Exelon Corp. plans to significantly
> expand its power marketing and trading businesses, Exelon officials
> said Wednesday.
>
>    "Our vision is to be the premier nuclear operator in the world,"
> said Jack Skolds, chief operating officer of Exelon Nuclear, who
> spoke at a Salomon Smith Barney analysts' conference in New York.
>    Added Ken Cornew, vice president of Exelon's trading operations:
> "Our strategy is relatively simple: We want to lead the industry in
> asset-based power marketing."
>
>    Exelon's strategy--to capitalize on existing power-generating
> assets by moving aggressively into trading and marketing--
> essentially is the reverse of that practiced by Dynegy Inc., the
> Houston-based company that started life as an energy trader and only
> relatively recently has begun acquiring physical assets. Among
> Dynegy's holdings are Decatur-based Illinois Power Co., a natural gas
> and electric utility.
>
>    Exelon, parent of Commonwealth Edison Co., already is the largest
> nuclear power utility in the U.S. and the third largest in the world,
> with 17 nuclear reactors. Skolds said the company is moving to expand
> its nuclear power base, both through efficiencies and acquisitions.
>
>    "Scale is turning out to be a very competitive advantage for us,
> if it's effectively leveraged, and I think we are doing that," Skolds
> said.
>
>    Including all forms of power generation, Exelon owns or controls
> 47,000 megawatts of of capacity across the U.S.
>
>    Exelon has about 60 people based in Kennett Square, Pa., dedicated
> to marketing and trading energy.
>
>    The Philadelphia area trading operation was begun by Peco Energy
> Co. in 1994, and now is part of Exelon, which is the product of the
> merger of Peco and Unicom Corp., ComEd's former parent.
>
>    Unicom also had a small trading operation, which has been combined
> with Peco's.
>
>    In 2000, Peco's trading operation reported $2.7 billion in
> revenues, up from $2.3 billion in 1999, according to a company
> spokesman.
>
>    Last year, Exelon began trading financial instruments that are
> energy related, such as energy futures and derivatives, which
> traditionally have been the turf of companies such as Dynegy and
> Enron Corp.
>
>    "Our goal is simply to be the world's best power marketer," Cornew
> said. "Our name doesn't come up right now when people talk about
> that. But I believe we have the best platform to achieve that."
>
>    Peggy Jones, managing director of utilities research at Blaylock &
> Partners in New York, said Exelon's goal appears to be achievable.
>
>    "They have the financial resources, the management resources and
> power generation resources to do the job."
>
>    Jones noted that Exelon's market capitalization of $21.3 billion
> tops Dynegy's $15.9 billion.
>
>
>
> Folder Name: power trading
> Relevance Score on Scale of 100: 95
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
> To review or revise your folder, visit http://www.djinteractive.com or
contact Dow Jones Customer Service by e-mail at custom.news@bis.dowjones.com
or by phone at 800-369-7466. (Outside the U.S. and Canada, call 609-452-1511
or contact your local sales representative.)
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
> Copyright (c) 2001 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved
>


I want to thank eaach of you for all of your support and friendship. I have thoroughly enjoyed working with you. I know we all have a long list of contact with whom we would like to stay in contact. I also know it will be difficult. To the extent possible, I would like hear from you to know how you are doing.

I wish the best to all of you. I hope our paths will cross again soon and often.

My contact information is

j2thorne@yahoo.com
281-478-5904

Sincerely,
Judy Thorne


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  , 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Crude     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/crude44.pdf
Natural Gas     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/ngas44.pdf
Distillate     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hoil44.pdf
Unleaded     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/unlded44.pdf

Nat Gas Strip Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/StripmatrixNG44.pdf
Nat Gas Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixNG44.pdf

Crude and Products Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixCL44.pdf

Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606  USA
Tel:  312-368-6149
Fax:  312-368-2281
soblander@carrfut.com
http://www.carrfut.com


I would like to discuss the draft agreements and need some perspective for
how they fit into the overall big picture (e.g., the gas agreement doesn't
explicitly discuss the 2 month lag or nomination issues which may be ok if
this is covered elsewhere).

When would be a good time?  I have a 1:30 - 2/2:30 meeting but am free
otherwise.


Ben,

Please find attached the tentative meeting schedule along with the
proposed travel itinerary.  Please let me know if you have any suggested
changes to the travel itinerary.

I will be out on vacation, but will be checking email.  Feel free to
leave me a voicemail too.  We can make any necessary changes prior to
your trip.  Thanks!

Missy Sturgeon
859-372-6869

 <<Interview Schedule Ben Rogers.doc>>
 - Interview Schedule Ben Rogers.doc


You have received this email because you are listed as an alternate data approver. Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000082182&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000082182
Approver            : b.scott.palmer@enron.com
Request Create Date : 2/4/02 9:06:52 AM
Requested For       : bryan.delahoussaye@enron.com
Resource Name       : Sitara Houston Production Upstream Company Edit Deal Compliance
Resource Type       : Applications


FYI - Status  of remaining steps are in blue.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Roper, Kerry
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 9:25 PM
To:	Piper, Greg; Pickering, Mark; Beck, Sally
Subject:	Remaining Steps For Plan

Mark suggested that I document the major steps remaining in the Plan process.  It appears that most of the numbers are nearing final approval and Mark suggested that I document the major steps remaining in the plan process:

1. Finalize EGM and EA (Storey) Development project approvals.
[Kerry Roper]  EA projects Finalized. EGM & EIM are still changing today.  The changes of the last few days has also had an impact to other business units, especially EES as the development managers have changed some participation percentages.
2. Show EA IT Development projects for Energy Ops as flowing through Energy Ops' allocation to EA (Note: I am assuming this is only for EA).
[Kerry Roper]  Done
3. Finalize Headcount numbers based on IT Development changes.
[Kerry Roper]  Changes still being made.  Used estimated headcount for Development in the allocation process.
4. Get "buy-off" on other business unit headcount numbers used in allocation process (9:30 meeting on Wed.)
[Kerry Roper]  Done
5. Run infrastructure charge-back model using updated headcount numbers.
[Kerry Roper]  Done
6. Based on results of charge-back model, change depreciation, bonus and indirect allocations.
[Kerry Roper]  Done
7. Receive new EA allocations (which will be higher due to adding indirects.)
[Kerry Roper]  Not received yet.
8. Add new Corporate and EA allocations received to internal allocation process. (New Corp alloc. received 10/16).
[Kerry Roper]  Done using estimates for new charges from EA. These should be accurate based on infrastructure dollars sent to them.
9. Rerun internal allocations (indirects).
[Kerry Roper]  Done
10. Recalculate Enterprise Portal allocations to business units.
[Kerry Roper]  This task not needed.
11. Note: B. Richter indicated that the new allocation procedure might not be completed this week. I am assuming that we will keep the existing  budget allocation for the budget. (Will this work for EBS and ETS?).  I also assume we are final with other changes to Energy Ops and infrastructure.
12. Get approval for split of EES Retail and EES Wholesale.
13. Once all numbers are final, verify that all ENW team budget templates are updated and then saved to the intercompany billing file.
14. Re-create billing matrix and invoice file (6-8 hour process including review).
15. Produce income summary income statement by ENW team. (Use as check).
16. Resubmit all Corporate templates and reports (6-8 hour process).
17. Produce reports for Office of the Chair and prepare for Ken Lay presentation.

These are the major steps in "my world."  I'm sure I am leaving some items out, but I think it gives you a feel for the steps we need to take.  Timing largely hinges on getting the final numbers completed and approved.

Kerry


---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 12/22/2000 07:25
AM ---------------------------

slafontaine@globalp.com on 12/22/2000 07:11:26 AM
To: slafontaine@globalp.com
cc:
Subject: Plants Shut Down and Sell the Energy

Subject:  Plants Shut Down and Sell the Energy

Plants Shut Down and Sell the Energy
By Peter Behr
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, December 21, 2000; Page E01
Kaiser Aluminum Corp. had planned to spend December making aluminum at its
giant smelters in the Pacific Northwest, run by electricity from the
Bonneville Power Administration's Columbia River dams. Then it saw a better
deal. With California desperate for power and electricity prices hitting
unheard-of peaks, Kaiser shut down its two U.S. smelters last week. It is
selling the electricity it no longer needs -- for about 20 times what it
pays Bonneville under long-standing contracts.
It is a measure of this winter's fuel crunch: Some big industrial firms in
energy-intensive sectors such as paper, fertilizers, metals and even
oil-field operations can make more money by selling their electricity or
natural gas than manufacturing their products. The shifts by such large
industrial consumers of energy -- described as unprecedented by analysts --
will free up more fuel for households and businesses this winter. But they
also are sowing seeds of potential problems next year. Shortages of aluminum
and fertilizer, for example, are likely to give another upward jolt to
consumer prices and further weaken the economy, analysts said.
"The fertilizer picture is particularly worrying us because we don't know
what they're going to use to grow crops with," said David Wyss, chief
economist at Standard & Poor's. Some economists have recently increased
their warnings about the damaging impact of this winter's heating bills on
an already weakening economy. Goldman Sachs analysts last week estimated
that gas heating bills will double this winter to more than $1,000 for a
typical U.S. household.
That and higher electricity prices will cost consumers $20 billion in higher
energy costs compared with a year ago, they estimated, cutting the expected
growth in the nation's economic output by one percentage point on an annual
rate in the first three months of next year. "Overall, the recent energy
price developments have thus added to the risk of a sharp economic
slowdown," the Goldman Sachs report concluded. Terra Industries Inc., in
Sioux City, Iowa, has closed three of its six U.S. ammonia plants, which use
natural gas as a main ingredient for fertilizer production. Like Kaiser, the
company realized it would be much more profitable to stop production in
December and sell the natural gas back to the market at current prices,
which are much higher than the price Terra was obligated to pay under its
existing December supply contract, said Mark Rosenbury, chief administrative
officer.
"We looked at these [current] prices and said, 'This is crazy,' " he said.
Terra hasn't disclosed the profit it will make selling its gas, but
Rosenbury said it would be "substantial."  In coming months, Terra's good
fortune could be reversed. It usually buys gas a month at a time, and the
prices for January delivery most likely will be well above its break-even
point. That would keep Terra's plants closed, Rosenbury said, but eliminate
the opportunity to sell the natural gas at a profit. "If this persists,"
Rosenbury said, "it's going to be a real problem."
He estimates that out of a total annual U.S. production capacity of 18
million tons of ammonia, about 4 million tons of production isn't operating
now. "Could we be short of fertilizer next spring? It's possible that
farmers will not have as much as they want," Rosenbury said. Royster-Clark
Inc., a Norfolk and New York City-based fertilizer manufacturer and
distributor, has shut down its one plant in East Dubuque, Ill.,
indefinitely, and 72 production workers will be laid off, beginning next
month. The story is the same -- natural gas prices are too high to justify
continued production. "We believe it's likely this is a speculative bubble
[in natural gas prices] that will burst and in a few weeks we'll be able to
buy gas at a more reasonable price, but that remains to be seen," said Paul
M. Murphy, the company's managing director for financial planning. A
continuation of high natural gas prices would likely shrink production and
raise fertilizer prices to a point that could affect farmers' decisions to
plant feed corn, he said. "It's sticker shock."
According to Wyss, if this winter remains unusually cold and natural gas
remains above $7 per million cubic feet -- double the level a year ago --
farm products could rise significantly a year from now and into 2002. In the
aluminum industry, several smaller producers have joined Kaiser, the
industry's No. 2 manufacturer, in closing down, noted Lloyd O'Carroll, an
analyst with BB&T Capital Markets in Richmond.
Aluminum production in November was 8.3 percent below that of November 1999,
and December's production will be lower still, he said. "We'll get more
production cut announcements, I think," he said. A slowing in the U.S. and
world economies next year could ease the impact of reduced aluminum
supplies. "But if the world economy doesn't fall completely apart, then
[aluminum] prices are going to rise, and they could rise significantly more
than the current forecast," he said. In Kaiser's case, it's an open question
how much of its electric windfall it will keep. Kaiser is contractually
entitled to buy electricity from Bonneville at $22.50 a megawatt per hour,
says spokesman Scott Lamb. That is the power it has sold back to Bonneville
for $550 a megawatt hour for December.
But the Bonneville Authority is pressuring Kaiser to use these and future
profits from power resales to compensate employees at the shut-down plants,
to invest in new electric generating capacity, or even to refund to
Bonneville's other customers, said Bonneville spokesman Ed Mosey. Kaiser and
Bonneville have negotiated a new power purchase deal to take effect after
next October, but the power authority says it intends to reduce deliveries
to Kaiser if the company tries to pocket the electricity sale profits. "Out
here, a deal is a deal, but it has to be a moral deal. There has to be an
ethical dimension to this and we're not shy in trying to make sure they live
up their advantage in having access to this publicly-owned power," Mosey
said.
, 2000 The Washington Post Company


Rakesh,

Can we meet with David Port on Thu  2:30
to review Raptors?

Vince


As I mentioned earlier to Mark, Jeff Girth of the NYT again today contacted
Lee Sachs about Enron.  You recall Lee was Asst Secretary of Treasury for
Financial Markets during the Clinton Administration.  From his conversation,
Lee reports the following items were raised by Girth:  a) the state of energy
trading products and investment climate; b)  Enron's role in this market; c)
whether and how financial energy products drive pricing and supply of
physical energy products (Lee told him emphatically no); and, c) whether
government regulators understand these issues.  Lee said this is clearly an
Enron specific story.  Lee thinks Girth came away from the conversation with
more of a right perspective (namely that these are important markets and that
we play a vital role).  Lee said that Girth was less focussed on passage of
the CEA and the politics than Girth had been in an earlier conversation;
almost all  of today's conversation was forward looking.  Girth told Lee that
he had not told Lee "all" that is behind this story, but did say that there
is an interesting twist (Lee thinks Girth perhaps something specific either
on a document front or source).   Lee gave Girth a list of experts to talk to
who are unbiased but clearly right thinking on the subject.  Lee suggested
that Girth to:  Pat Parkinson at the Fed (the godfather of the "hands off"
regulatory perspective for the OTC market), Bill Rainer, and Ed Rosen (a
prominent attorney in NY).  Lee expects Girth to keep calling him.


Linda:
I am a medium.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

	Linda J Noske
	09/06/00 01:48 PM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roger Balog/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy
Banczak/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandi M Braband/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron, Teresa G Bushman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Carter/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barton Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M
Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shonnie Daniel/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Angela Davis/NA/Enron@Enron, Peter del Vecchio/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy E
Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shawna Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert H
George/SA/Enron@Enron, James Grace/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Barbara N
Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Greenberg/NA/Enron@ENRON, Wayne Gresham/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent
Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Anne C Koehler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Travis McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet H
Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janice R Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julia Murray/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marcus Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON, Martin W
Penkwitz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, David Portz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael A
Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B
Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lance Schuler-Legal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lou Stoler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ann Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stuart
Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberlee A
Bennick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Genia
FitzGerald/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nony Flores/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Linda R Guinn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ed B Hearn III/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary J
Heinitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Deb Korkmas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matt
Maxwell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Laurie Mayer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Ogden/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay
Young/HOU/ECT@ECT, Merrill W Haas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie
Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Greg Johnston/CAL/ECT@ECT, Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Mark Powell/CAL/ECT@ECT, Chris Gaffney/TOR/ECT@ECT, Mark Elliott/LON/ECT@ECT,
Denis O'Connell/LON/ECT@ECT, Robert Quick/LON/ECT@ECT, Karen E
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT,
John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Andrea Calo/SA/Enron@Enron, Jane
McBride/AP/Enron@Enron, Mark Evans/Legal/LON/ECT@ECT, Matthias
Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT, Alan Larsen/PDX/ECT@ECT, Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri L
Cromwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gloria Cruz/Corp/Enron@Enron, Joya Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Janette Elbertson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kaye Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carolyn
George/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jenny Helton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Taffy
Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda J Noske/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Radford/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Linda J Simmons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dina Snow/Corp/Enron@Enron, Twanda
Sweet/HOU/ECT@ECT, Becky Tlucek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda Whitehead/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Chaundra Woods/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: LEGAL CONFERENCE - SHIRT SIZE

PLEASE FORWARD YOUR SHIRT SIZE TO ME (S, M, L, XL, ETC.) AS SOON AS POSSIBLE,
BUT NO LATER THAN FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 2000.

THANK YOU!!!!


You are scheduled to attend:

Harassment Avoidance
Class Days and Times:
  2/23/2001  02:45:00 PM - 04:15:00 PM
Room # & Location: DoubleTree-La Salle B,  Houston
Participant Fee: $ 50
Note:

If you are unable to attend this class, the registration must be canceled by
5:00 p.m. on  February 23, 2001 to prevent a charge of $ 50 to your RC
number.

 We look forward to seeing you at 02:45:00 PM on February 23, 2001.  Please
call the Development Center Team at 713-853-0357 if you have any questions.

 Thank you.


This request has been pending your approval for  56 days.  Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000057285&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000057285
Request Create Date : 8/30/01 5:59:30 PM
Requested For       : erik.simpson@enron.com
Resource Name       : Market Data Kobra Crude
Resource Type       : Applications


Dad:
Congrats on the press release.  People that found out about it were amazed
that we did it so quickly.  I was thinking, if you could call Ken, that would
be great.  I know Michael is talking to Dave, but talking to Ken would really
help my cause.  Let me know what you think.  I also am sending you a
presentation that you will really enjoy.
Regards,
Ben


fyi - notice Heating Oil stocks below.
---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 06/30/2000 05:02 PM
---------------------------

John Griffith@ENRON
06/27/2000 05:42 PM
To: Jared Kaiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: API Crude, Distillate and Unleaded Stocks Graphs

fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by John Griffith/Corp/Enron on 06/27/2000
06:32 PM ---------------------------

SOblander@carrfut.com on 06/27/2000 05:27:07 PM
To: soblander@carrfut.com
cc:

Subject: API Crude, Distillate and Unleaded Stocks Graphs

The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  , 2000 Carr Futures

The charts are now in the most recent version of Adobe Acrobat 4.0 and they
should print clearly from Adobe Acrobat Reader 3.0 or higher. Adobe Acrobat
Reader 4.0 may be downloaded for FREE from www.adobe.com.

(See attached file: UnleadedStocks.pdf)(See attached file:
HeatingOilStocks.pdf)(See attached file: PADDIIstocksCL.pdf)(See attached
file: PADDIstocksHO.pdf)(See attached file: PADDIstocksHU.pdf)(See attached
file: CrudeStocks.pdf)
 - UnleadedStocks.pdf
 - HeatingOilStocks.pdf
 - PADDIIstocksCL.pdf
 - PADDIstocksHO.pdf
 - PADDIstocksHU.pdf
 - CrudeStocks.pdf


Stinson,

Cantekin has an interesting background. Please, take a look at his resume.
It's on his web-site. Project on radio and TV broadband.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/29/2000
12:30 PM ---------------------------

"Cantekin Dincerler" <cantekin@mail.utexas.edu> on 03/28/2000 11:48:53 AM
Please respond to cantekin@mail.utexas.edu
To: vkamins@ect.enron.com
cc:  (bcc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT)
Subject: summer internship

Hi Vince,

I am writing you at this time to inquire as to the potential of renewing my
internship at Enron for the Summer of 2000.

While the date of my request is later than I would have wished, the reason
is that I had originally planned to go back to Turkey this summer and get
my mandatory military duty done. However, I now realize I can put it off to
a further date. That left me wondering if you believe there is a project
that I can get involved in this summer and be useful. If that were the
case, I would be more than happy to postpone my military duty and spend the
summer with the research group. I discussed this with Dr. Ronn, and he is
very supportive of this idea.

I apologize again for bringing up this issue late, and look forward to
hearing from you.

Best regards,

 ---------oOOo-----oOOo----------
Cantekin Dincerler

Doctoral Candidate
The University of Texas at Austin
Graduate School of Business
Department of Finance
office: (512) 471-1676
fax   : (512) 471-5073
home  : (512) 472-5356
http://uts.cc.utexas.edu/~cantekin
 -------------oooO-----Oooo----------


Andy Edison is handling

	Michelle Lawless/ENRON@enronXgate
	04/06/2001 03:52 PM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Lisa Robichaux/ENRON@enronXgate
		 Subject: Service of Process

Please see attached memo.
;
;


---------------------- Forwarded by Kayne Coulter/HOU/ECT on 03/01/2001 06:27
AM ---------------------------

Keith Comeaux
02/27/2001 03:27 PM
To: kayne.coulter@enron.com, erik.serio@enron.com,
chris.lenartowicz@enron.com, george.diaz@enron.com,
justin.laverell@enron.com, Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Oasis change

Just got this information on a OASIS change.
Keith


Hi Rod,

I know you will be looking into cost and support issues relating to the services we get from Enron Global Finance.  I am of the opinion that the dedication of a talented Global Finance professional will provide us with a much better work product (service) at a significantly lower cost, if we can get EGF to allocate 100% of the cost of the employee and eliminate their allocation to us entirely.

I would like to suggest that you consider Dan Castagnola as the dedicated resource.  Not only is Dan very familiar with all or a majority of our projects from both the commercial as well as the finance perspective, but in my experience working with him, he is an extremely creative and talented business person.  I would feel very fortunate to have Dan on my team.

Just a recommendation ...

Thanks, Mariella

ps: Jeff has worked with Dan so he can also give you his independent perspective.


Have you had a chance to look into this?

Thanks,
Melissa
---------------------- Forwarded by Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT on 03/13/2001
09:25 AM ---------------------------

Melissa Ann Murphy
03/08/2001 04:58 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: deal # 253768

Hello, I noticed that deal # 253768 is an index deal with EES that has not
been changed from the CAL PX to the Dow Jones index.  Could you ask Valerie
or Bob Badeer if this deal should be changed?  I was going to send them a
revised confirm.

Thanks!
Melissa


I am putting a Master Gas Agreement in place w/ Connective.  Russell Diamond
has asked me to contact you re their guaranty.  I need for their guaranty to
us to also cover physical gas trades.   Please advise.

Thanks,

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Semperger, Cara
Sent:	Thursday, November 29, 2001 10:13 AM
To:	Heizenrader, Tim
Subject:	NEW LOGO

<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>


See below.  Can we get some help on the IBM issues?
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 11/12/2000 02:36 PM -----

	Erin Rice
	11/10/2000 11:08 AM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Courtney Votaw/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Re: BackWeb

Steve:

At this point, our IT contacts are backpedalling a bit and suggesting they
can overcome the TIBCO and Terminal Server problems.  There are still four
important issues, however:

IT still cannot commit to transferring messages across domains.  This means
that messages initiated at Corp and intended for the entire Enron
organization will not reach any business units outside the Corp domain.
No messages will reach the EES organization unless IBM agrees not to use
their proprietary message delivery tool, WebSphere, and will use WebLogic
instead.  WebLogic is required by BackWeb, although it is designed by a
separate company.
HR, intended to be a key user of this tool, will not use BackWeb because
survey responses cannot be made anonymous.  HR has already purchased a tool
called CONFIRMIT that can execute anonymous surveys.
Messages will not be delivered simultaneously to all users in the same
domain, nor will they be delivered for two to five hours after they are sent
by the message administrator.

Another thing to consider is that these messages will be set to expire and
disappear within a set period of time, meaning users cannot retrieve them and
read them later (as they can with e-mail).  This means that I could be away
from the office for several days and miss a message entirely, because it
would have expired and disappeared by the time I returned.

The plain fact is that a few members of IT are pushing this initiative, but
they lack commercial sponsorship.  They are hoping Corp will foot the bill
for a pilot which will allow them to fully test this tool before implementing
it company-wide.

Please let us know if you have additional questions.

- er

----- Forwarded by Courtney Votaw/NA/Enron on 11/09/2000 12:08 PM -----

	Steven J Kean
	11/09/2000 11:35 AM

		 To: Courtney Votaw/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: BackWeb

Do we have a sense for how many we can reach, how many we can't and where
they are?  Are whole offices (eg Tokyo) unreachable or is it only those who
have home offices?

	Courtney Votaw
	11/08/2000 11:02 AM

		 To: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Erin Rice/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: BackWeb

Mark and Steve-

Erin Rice and I would like to meet with you to discuss the issues concerning
BackWeb before we proceed.  As you can see from the Design Document, they are
pretty significant.

Thanks,
 Courtney


If we can't get Wilkerson, Hightower (both Top 5 nationally) and a decommit
or two from Texas or somebody based on this news then our coaches are
indeed pathetic salesmen. These guys can come in and start as redshirt frosh
if not play as true freshmen, even though RC likes to redshirt all OL'men.

http://www.dallasnews.com/sports_day/colleges/football/243173_21amlede.html


Per Rose's instructions.

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/17/2000 12:51
PM ---------------------------

"Lindo, Jacqueline E." <jacquelinelindo@akllp.com> on 11/14/2000 08:59:23 AM
To: <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Pipitone, Paul" <paulpipitone@akllp.com>, "Cobb, Chris"
<chriscobb@akllp.com>

Subject: Gas Turbine Purchase Agreement.DOC

 Attached please find a clean copy of Version 6 of the GE Turbine
Agreement.

 <<Gas Turbine Purchase Agreement.DOC>>
 - Gas Turbine Purchase Agreement.DOC


In order for UBS Warburg to timely process your paycheck, I am requesting that all employee's accepting offers return any outstanding forms to my new desk location at  05852 on the 5th floor of ECS (Look for the Hamburg Flag) by noon this Friday  2/01/02.  This will prevent any benefit deductions from having to be "Double Deducted" on future checks.  Please attach a deposit slip or voided check stub to your direct deposit form.  Attached below are the forms needed for payroll/benefits, in case you did not turn these in at Orientation.  Lastly, please verify that your EHRonline home address is showing your current home address because all live checks will be mailed to your home residence.

Thanks, Tony Jarrett
Benefits
Ext. 3- 7829


Koch commercial willing to do ring trade 2.2 million bbls koch/conagra and koch credit(bellknapp?) killed the deal. can you guys follow up.


----- Forwarded by Stephanie Harris/Corp/Enron on 12/13/2000 01:43 PM -----

	John.Schwartzenburg@enron.com
	12/13/2000 01:22 PM

		 To: Stephanie.Harris@enron.com
		 cc: vsharp@enron.com
		 Subject: EECC Litigation Update - Puerto Rico, Marmara, Dabhol

I would like to update the legal report I just sent to you as follows:

   Puerto Rico:  Larry Izzo had a conference call with Misson Energy
   regarding the claims between EECC and EcoElectrica. Enron's shareholder
   representative was also involved.  The parties reached agreement in
   principle on the open issues (the owner dropped its claims against EECC,
   EECC relinquished two smaller claims, the Owner will pay EECC's
   remaining claims).  Bracewell's analysis of the claims was very helpful
   in reaching this result.
   Marmara: As expected, Black&Veatch has filed a formal notice of
   arbitration against EECC relative to sums they claim are due them with
   respect to the Marmara Project. EECC management expects that this will
   be settled early next year, and that it may provide an opportunity to
   reach a global settlement with Black & Veatch re Puerto Rico and
   potential future work.  Gail Brownfeld and Scott Burdine of Hagans, Bob,
   Burdine are both up to speed.
   Dabhol: Besix has informed us that we will be receiving thier notice of
   arbitration re the Dabhol Quarry before the end of the year. We are told
   that they have changed their counsel, apparently releasing the English
   firm of Masons and engaging a firm in Washington DC of Watts, Tieder,
   Hoffer & Fitzgerald to carry the claim forward. This is an unusual move,
   since the contract is governed by English law and the site of the
   arbitration will London. Besix's local representative told  our project
   manager that Besix was not happy with the Masons advice, but it may be
   that they want a US firm involved, backed up by an English firm. I have
   asked Phil Bruns to check into the reputation of  Watts, Teider. He was
   not familiar with them, but has found that it is a 67 lawyer firm that
   specializes in construction and real with a main office in northern
   Virginia and offices in California. Gail Brownfeld, Phil Bruns, and
   Jonathon Rosshandler are all aware of this development.

JWVS


---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 10/23/2000
10:34 AM ---------------------------

Ross Berthelot <rossberthelot@home.com> on 10/22/2000 06:25:24 PM
Please respond to rossberthelot@home.com
To: Allison Istre <a_istre@msn.com>, Amy Allums <aallums@law.tulane.edu>,
Ashly Morgan <ashly@eatel.net>, Ben Berthelot <bberthelot@ccbcu.com>, BBBERTH
<BBBERTH@aol.com>, Beth Simon <elizabetht@worldnet.att.net>, Brian Bonjour
<brianbonjour@hotmail.com>, Callie Fuselier <CALLIEF@aol.com>, Chad Greer
<cgreer@mgm.com>, Chris Bourgeois <cbourge@home.com>, Clay and Corinne Hufft
<chufft@bellsouth.net>, Clint Eilbeck <ceilbeck@hotmail.com>, David Ural
<dural54@aol.com>, denise hopkins <dahopkins@aol.com>, Dizneach
<JDEACH@aol.com>, Dog Boy <denisnaq@home.com>, Don Edgerton
<mbdperforms@eatel.net>, Emmet Nicaud <enicaud@entechsales.com>, emily elliot
<psyee@showme.missouri.edu>, erin saporito <esaporito@crt.state.la.us>, Grace
Feng <gracefeng77@yahoo.com>, Jake Greig <jakegreig@yahoo.com>, Jenny Milliet
<j_milliet@hotmail.com>, Jerome Landreneau <LandreneauJ@aol.com>, kent walker
<kwalker609@yahoo.com>, Louis Ledet <LLedet3234@aol.com>, Luke Berthelot
<LBerth123@aol.com>, Matt Greene <megreene7@yahoo.com>, Matt Lenhart
<Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com>, Mercedes Arias <ariamer@yahoo.com>, Mike Breland
<mbrelan@lsu.edu>, Mike Gooch <michael.gooch@nmfn.com>, Mom
<BGreig3234@aol.com>, Myers Namie <CLCS@MSN.COM>, Naima Patton
<npatton21@hotmail.com>, Paul Thibidoeaux <pthibod@aol.com>, Portealous
<tporteous@burke-mayer.com>, Rhett Staehling <staehling@hotmail.com>, Scott
DeHart <dehart81@hotmail.com>, Scott Naquin <scottnaquin@aol.com>, Shannon
Strange <CLCSNO@MSN.COM>, Shawn Darrah <sdarrah@lsu.edu>, Tim Dietz
<TDietz@Allstate.com>, Tom Williamson <tpwilliamson@nalco.com>, Tommy
Porteous <Porteoust@aol.com>, Zack Smith <zfoto@earthlink.net>
cc:

Subject: [Fwd: Fw: Click on the link and see what happens]]

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Fw: Click on the link and see what happens]
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2000 01:59:45 -0500
From: "Nikki Davies" <ndavies8@home.com>
Reply-To: "Nikki Davies" <ndavies8@home.com>
To: "Virginia Mire" <vlm734s@mail.smsu.edu>,"Ross Berthelot"
<rossberthelot@home.com>,"Paula Durand" <paula.durand@db.com>,"Paul
Chadick" <PJChadik@aol.com>,"Nikki Bausbacher"
<nikkib@protolink.com>,"Mom & Dad" <jbdavies@mindspring.com>,"Michelle
Perron" <MsShell328@aol.com>,"Mark Ahern"
<eiuahern@hotmail.com>,"Katherine & Jamie Howard"
<kajam@webtv.net>,"Jeremy Louviere" <jml4489@hotmail.com>,"Diana Gary"
<diana@delhommecpa.com>,"Anthony Phillips"
<anth0ny24@hotmail.com>,"Amber Mitchell" <amitche@lsu.edu>,"Adam Gula"
<tke577@webtv.net>

----- Original Message -----
From: "Yager, Gerard J SIEP-EPT-DD" <GY983773@MSXSEPC.SHELL.COM>
To: "'Nikki Davies (home)'" <ndavies8@home.com>; "'jeanne'"
<jeannec@gambitweekly.com>; "'Tracy A Fitzgerald'"
<Tracy.A.Falk@mvn02.usace.army.mil>
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 3:49 PM
Subject: Click on the link and see what happens]

>
>
> > >> > > > >  >> > > >       <A HREF="
http://home.att.net/~viseguy/fun.html
> > >
> >
> >
>


Will do. Thanks.   Mary, please give me a call when you have a free minute.
I have some news.

"Mervenne, Mary" <MMERV@opic.gov> on 12/14/2000 09:02:53 AM
To: "'Rob.G.Gay@enron.com'" <Rob.G.Gay@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: ECA provisions

Tom, Frank, Melissa and I are available tomorrow at 12:30 for the ECA call.
Can you ask Blanca to set up a dial in number and distribute?

Thanks
Mary
> .


Return Receipt

 Your
 document:

 was received Kelley Doolan/ST/FIS
 by:

 at:          03:18:34 PM Today


SHOW ME THE MONEY!!!

                      "McMurry, Eric"
                      <Eric.McMurry@elp        To:       Elden Condie <Elden.condie@acnenergy.com>, Eric McMurry <eric.mcmurry@elpaso.com>, Greg
                      aso.com>                  Schockling <gregory.schockling@bhlp.com>, Jeff North <jeno@dynegy.com>, John Crumley
                                                <jcrumley@pcenergy.com>, John Grass <john.grass@enron.com>, John Hodge <john.hodge@enron.com>, Matt
                      12/26/01 01:52 PM         Stephenson <mstephenson@pcenergy.com>, Nelson Ferries <nelson.ferries@enron.com>, Noel Bartlo
                                                <noel.bartlo@elpaso.com>, Scott Goodell <scott.goodell@enron.com>, Scott Maxfield <scom@dynegy.com>,
                                                Sean Seelbach <swseelbach@aol.com>, Steve Gillespie <steve.gillespie@enron.com>
                                               cc:
                                               Subject:  Congratulations to the CARTEL! This year's COLFFL Superbowl Champ       ion!

Congratulations go out  to the Cartel for winning this year's Superbowl.
The
Cartel  beat the River Rats with a final score of 87 to 73. Everybody who
won money this year go bug Matt about it as I am not handling the finances
of the league!  Scott while your collecting your money, tell Matt to get
your name put on the trophy.

Eric

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender.
******************************************************************


FYI.  This is the bill to de-link the bonds from the DWR contracts (recall that the argument to end DA by the Gov's finance folks, the bond folks, and Angelides, the Treasurer stems directly from this linkage).

Though Hertzberg was initially a supporter, his legal consultant has been scared off by the Gov's people (i.e., to de-link would "impair" the contracts, triggering breach, liquidated damages and the end of Western Civilization as we know it).  The Senate ain't buying that line.

As a result, it's now a Senate play, but they need Republicans to get the 2/3's necessary for passage, which ain't likely to be easy.  We urging Brulte to go along, but only  in exchange for deleting the "no DA" language in AB1X and for legislative language assuring that DA will continue.

Best,
Jeff

	"Scott Govenar" <sgovenar@govadv.com> 07/17/2001 11:27 AM Please respond to sgovenar 	   To: "Ban Sharma" <ban.sharma@enron.com>, "David Leboe" <David.Leboe@ENRON.com>, "Eric Letke" <eletke@enron.com>, "Jennifer Thome" <Jennifer.Thome@enron.com>, "Ken Smith" <ken@kdscommunications.com>, "Bev Hansen" <bhansen@lhom.com>, "Hedy Govenar" <hgovenar@govadv.com>, "Miyung Buster" <Miyung.Buster@enron.com>, "Janel Guerrero" <Janel.Guerrero@enron.com>, "Robert Frank" <rfrank@enron.com>, "Mike Day" <MDay@GMSSR.com>, "Leslie Lawner" <Leslie.Lawner@enron.com>, "Harry. Kingerski@enron. com" <Harry.Kingerski@enron.com>, "Karen Denne" <kdenne@enron.com>, "Steven Kean" <Steven.J.Kean@enron.com>, "Alan Comnes" <acomnes@enron.com>, "Susan J Mara" <smara@enron.com>, "Paul Kaufman" <paul.kaufman@enron.com>, "Jeff Dasovich" <jdasovic@enron.com>, "Jim Steffes" <james.d.steffes@enron.com>, "Rick Shapiro" <rshapiro@enron.com>  cc:   Subject: SB 18 (Burton) - Bonding

Attached, please find SB 18 (Burton) relating to bonds.  This is a regular
session bill with an urgency clause which means it requires a 2/3 vote.  The
bill language was formerly associated with ABX2 10 (Hertzberg).  The bill
could be heard by the Senate Energy Committee as early as today however as
of this moment it is still not on calendar.

http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/bill/sen/sb_0001-0050/sbx2_18_bill_20010716_amend
ed_sen.pdf


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  , 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Crude     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/crude44.pdf
Natural Gas     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/ngas44.pdf
Distillate     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hoil44.pdf
Unleaded     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/unlded44.pdf

Nat Gas Strip Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/StripmatrixNG44.pdf
Nat Gas Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixNG44.pdf

Crude and Products Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixCL44.pdf

Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606  USA
Tel:  312-368-6149
Fax:  312-368-2281
soblander@carrfut.com
http://www.carrfut.com


Start Date: 2/5/02; HourAhead hour: 9;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.


Harry:
Here is version #5.  Morris Clark will send me his comments sometime tomorrow.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


yep but there area lot of people that are hurting right now

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cheri Weyman <cweyman@astraoil.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, November 01, 2001 12:15 PM
To:	Tholt, Jane M.
Subject:	RE: Matthew at Halloween

Thanks Janie!!!!  Are you just loving the fact that you had sold all of your
stock or what?!!!!

-----Original Message-----
From: Tholt, Jane M. [mailto:Jane.M.Tholt@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 9:54 AM
To: cweyman@astraoil.com
Subject: RE: Matthew at Halloween

What a cutie

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Cheri Weyman <cweyman@astraoil.com>@ENRON
> Sent:	Wednesday, October 31, 2001 11:58 PM
> To:	Therese Rourk; Suzanne Austin; Stephanie McCluer; Scott Walker;
> Sahar Slosser; Ray McCluer; Moira Parro; Michelle Brown; Linda Nash;
> Leslie Hyne; Lauren Neal; Keith Sawyer; Kay Neve; Katherine McCarthy;
> Tholt, Jane M.; Jackie Allsop; Doug & Molly Wells; Dick & Christine
> Rogoff; Dana Gabriel; Croom & Lyle Beatty; Celia & Bob Fowler; Cathy
> Sheil; Carla Johnson; Bill Fagan; Bill Brown; Abby Benton
> Subject:	Matthew at Halloween
>
> Here is a picture that my dad took of Matthew while we were trying to
> get
> him into his costume tonight.  Nevermind how bad I look....Hopefully
> we will
> have some good ones of him with his head piece on too when I get the
> other
> pix developed!  This is all I have for now...He had so much fun!
>
> Cheri
>
>  - Matthew 103101.jpg << File: Matthew 103101.jpg >>

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


obeisance (o-BAY-sans, o-BEE-) noun

   1. A movement of the body expressing deep respect or deferential courtesy,
      as before a superior; a bow, curtsy, or other similar gesture.

   2. Deference or homage.

[Middle English obeisaunce, from Old French obeissance, from obeissant,
present participle of obeir, to obey.]

   "I was always glad to be relieved from my duty, and went straight to the
   bedroom after doing obeisance to my father."
   M.K. Gandhi, The Story of My Experiments With Truth, 1927.

Five or seven messages in a week? That was a close poll. We received 4112
votes for five compared to 4049 for seven. This is your list and accordingly,
beginning with next week AWAD will go out five days a week.

Thanks to everyone for taking the time to voice your opinion. Your love and
concern shows--a good number of people sent their votes for five to indicate
that we, the people at Wordsmith, should take some time off.

Here are some selections from the comments that came with the ballots.
(Ballot, from Italian ballotta, a small ball used to register a vote.
So for this poll, maybe I should call these emailots).          -Anu

   If you go to five, you'll have to change the name of this valuable
   mailing to FWAW. Scott Murphree-Roberts

   I'd vote with the Beatles - eight days a week! Please don't stop AWAD at
   weekends! Barbara Cooper, Rome, Italy

   With so many words to learn, we need at least seven days a week.
   Helen Slade

   Oh, Like I'd Just Stop BREATHING on Weekends?
   More work for you, more fun for me. Seems like a no-brainer to me!
   Thanks for the great service! Hampton G. Miller

   In the Middle East, Thursday and Friday are the weekend. Here in New
   Zealand, our Monday is your (North American) Sunday. The "weekend"
   therefore stretches from Thursday to Monday. Seen from a global
   perspective (which is the only reasonable view to take on a language as
   ubiquitous as English) the issue is therefore meaningless. Regards,
   Philip Gould

   I like 7. I enjoy the email, and use it to verify that my email is up and
   running. Audrey Calvo

   If, like the gallant little tailor, you're up to seven at a blow, so am I!
   Heartfelt thanks for 'A word a day' and AWADtalk -- the highlights of my
   day! Cheers, Paulb

   Take a break on weekends! Give me time to absorb all the wonderful new
   words you have sent during the week! Maddytg

   Take the weekend off. Although I will miss the extra two entries, I'd
   rather see you conserve your efforts. I would hate to see this wonderful
   service burn out because of fatigue. Jane Dinielli

   Have weekends free. I think AWAD is great, but I also think you deserve
   time off. I hope enough others agree! Art Funkhouser, Bern, Switzerland

   I say take a break but I really love your programme - even if it does
   spell the American way, eh? Rod Dawson, Canada

   I love wordsmith. I feel smarter, look smarter. But I want to be dumb on
   weekends and find that I don't pay attention as much. Please don't think
   that we don't love you as much as ever just because we want slightly less
   of you. Janice Heilmann

This week's theme: words from Gandhi's autobiography.

.............................................................................
The Lord prefers common-looking people. That is the reason He makes so many
of them. -Abraham Lincoln, 16th president of the U.S. (1809-1865)

Q: Can I make a link from my Web site to the AWAD site?
A: Certainly. You may use this HTML:

Pronunciation:
http://wordsmith.org/words/obeisance.wav
http://wordsmith.org/words/obeisance.ram


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 07/18/2001
07:15 AM ---------------------------
From: Jeff Dasovich on 07/17/2001 07:31 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich

To: skean@enron.com, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Harry
Kingerski/Enron@EnronXGate, Leslie Lawner/Enron@EnronXGate, Michael
Tribolet/ENRON@enronXgate, Kristin Walsh/Enron@EnronXGate, Karen
Denne/Enron@EnronXGate, mpalmer@enron.com, Janel Guerrero/Enron@EnronXGate,
Paul Kaufman/Enron@EnronXGate, Susan M Landwehr/Enron@EnronXGate, Linda
Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: California Update--0717.01

What people know:

Hertzberg (et al's) bill (82XX)was heard in an "informational" hearing today
and still sits in the Assembly Energy Committee.  It will be heard again
tomorrow (perhaps beginning at 10 AM) , at which time parties will have a
chance to support/oppose and ask for amendments.  Most, including us, oppose
unless significantly amended.
The Wright (D) -Richman (R) bill (83XX)was heard in an "informational"
hearing today and still sits in the Assembly Energy Committee.  It will be
heard again tomorrow, at which time parties will have a chance to
support/oppose and ask for amendments.  From our perspective, this is the
best bill out there yet, though it still has serious problems---it isn't
available electronically yet, but should be tomorrow, and I'll distribute
then.  The chances of the joint D-R bill being successful are slim, however,
since it's up against the Speakers competing bill.  There is talk that the
Speaker will try to negotiate with Wright/Richman tonight and include any
agreement in his bill (82XX).
The original version of the Governor's MOU bill sits in the Senate.  Most
believe that Burton will put it up for a vote this week and it will fail.
The Senate's version of the MOU (Sher-Peace-Kuehl) (78XX)came out today.  It
will likely be heard in the committee tomorrow or the next day.  Notably, it
kills Direct Access completely and makes Edison shareholders responsible for
that portion of Edison's debt owed to suppliers.  In short, a very bad bill.
Burton's 18XX, which would de-link the bond issuance (to pay back the General
Fund) from the DWR contracts is likely to pass the Senate tomorrow or the
next day.  Many--including Enron--support the bill (though we are supporting
it behind the scenes).

What people don't know:
Whether there's the time or the will in the Assembly and Senate to achieve by
Friday a single, comprehensive bill that can be sent to the governor for his
signature.
Whether the Legislature would postpone its month-long recess if the
Legislature hasn't finished a bill by Friday (most folks think they will not
postpone).
Whether it's true that, irrespective of the energy issue, the Legislature
will fail to get the budget completed by Friday and therefore have to
postpone their recess anyway, in which case they might continue to work on
the energy legislation at the same time.

Odds-makers still say it's better than 50-50 that the Legislature does not
get the Edison bills done by Friday and leaves on on its 30-day vacation.

Best,
Jeff

Sacramento is one goofy place.


what is the status of this?
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 03/20/2000
09:48 AM ---------------------------

RTellis@milbank.com on 03/20/2000 09:37:44 AM
To: Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com
cc: SHoward@milbank.com
Subject: Co-Gen Docs.

Richard, any luck getting the Co-Gen documents together?? We need to produce
them soon in connection with the both the California cases and the Third
Party Subpoenas served in the IDS case.? Please let me know at your earliest
convenience.

Also, has Akin Gump sent you their documents re: NSM?

This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee
or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify
the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer.


FYI.  The case management statements are due May 5.  I'll forward Rule 49
separately so that you can start thinking about what we need to say in it.
Also think about who we are aligned with for purposes of cross-examination
panels.

-----Original Message-----
From: Cooke, Michelle [mailto:mlc@cpuc.ca.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2000 12:27 PM
To: 'smckinley@ingaa.org'; 'jwilliams@eei.org'; 'kmccrea@sablaw.com';
'defrawis@efaches.navfac.navy.mil'
<mailto:'defrawis@efaches.navfac.navy.mil'> ; 'rcsstl@cdmnet.com';
'mbrubaker@consultbai.com' <mailto:'mbrubaker@consultbai.com'> ;
'tdodd@lgl.twc.com'; 'michael-briggs@reliantenergy.com';
'andy.bettwy@swgas.com'; 'dnorris@sppc.com'; 'fchu@legal.ladwp.com';
'napedersen@jonesday.com'; 'athomas@newenergy.com';
'lisa_g_urick@calpx.com'; 'kduggan@capstoneturbine.com'; 'montoym1@sce.com';
'rsperberg@onsitesycom.com'; 'jleslie@luce.com'; 'mshames@ucan.org';
'snelson@sempra.com'; 'gbutsko@butskoutility.com';
'solardevelopmentcooperative@go.com'
<mailto:'solardevelopmentcooperative@go.com'> ; 'lmoses@anaheim.net';
'awattslaw@earthlink.net' <mailto:'awattslaw@earthlink.net'> ;
'rjhickok@duke-energy.com'; 'gackerman@wptf.org';
'furutanj@efawest.navfac.navy.mil'; 'mdjoseph@adamsbroadwell.com'; Bromson,
Jonathan; 'difellman@energy-law-group.com'; 'theresa_mueller@ci.sf.ca.us';
'chrisw@greenlining.org'; 'dgrueneich@gralegal.com'; 'jlondon@gralegal.com';
'peter.bray@pgees.com'; 'ewo@jmbm.com'; 'saw@jmbm.com'
<mailto:'saw@jmbm.com'> ; 'abh1@pge.com'; 'jff1@pge.com';
'phanschen@mofo.com'; 'pxo2@pge.com'; 'scarter@nrdc.org';
'rschmidt@bartlewells.com'; 'bcragg@gmssr.com'; 'bgaillard@enron.com';
'eke@aelaw.com'; 'jsqueri@gmssr.com'; 'jkarp@whitecase.com';
'lindseyhowdowning@dwt.com'; 'rick.counihan@greenmountain.com';
'ssmyers@hooked.net'; 'grant_kolling@cerberus.city.palo-alto.ca.us';
'uditetrad@slip.net'; 'jackp@calpine.com'; 'igsinc@ix.netcom.com';
'dmarcus@slip.net'; 'gmorris@emf.net'; 'philm@scdenergy.com';
'mpretto@ci.santa-clara.ca.us'; 'bmcc@mccarthylaw.com'; 'scottst@mid.org'
<mailto:'scottst@mid.org'> ; 'jeff@jbsenergy.com';
'blaising@braunlegal.com'; 'jsole@caiso.com'; 'jweil@aglet.org';
'nextel3@msn.com'; 'bdicapo@lmlaw.net'; 'jdh@eslawfirm.com';
'abb@eslawfirm.com'; 'abb@eslawfirm.com'; 'rliebert@cfbf.com';
'aorchar@smud.org'; 'mpa@aelaw.com'; 'jna@olywa.net'; 'dws@keywaycorp.com';
'camthor@statoilenergy.com'; 'achan@ladwp.com'; 'jkloberdanz@sempra.com'
<mailto:'jkloberdanz@sempra.com'> ; 'ronknecht@aol.com';
'lhubbard@sempra.com'; 'bfinkelstein@turn.org'; 'oshirock@pacbell.net';
'stephanie.krapf@pactel.com'; 'epoole@adplaw.com'; 'aod@newsdata.com';
'resource@sirius.com'; 'dya@ux.netcom.com'; 'bepstein@fablaw.com';
'rbw@mrwassoc.com'; 'rczahar@aol.com'; 'rothrock@ix.netcom.com';
'rmccann@cal.net'; 'jewilson@arb.ca.gov'; 'karen@klindh.com';
'brussel@ci.redding.ca.us'; Ortega, Barbara; Johnson, Aaron J.; Mazy,
Anthony; Wetstone, Brad; Danforth, Christopher; Berman, Daniel M.; Smith,
Don; Quiroz, Edgar A.; Quan, Edwin; Cluff, George; Wilson, Gregory A.;
Loewen, James; Morse, Jay; Tran, Lana; Tan, Lee-Whei; Enderby, Marshal B.;
Lyons, Martin G.; Ebke, Maryam; Cooke, Michelle; Walsh, Natalie; White,
Rosalina; Cauchois, Scott; 'toe@cpuc.ca.gov'; Beck, Valerie; Blumer, Werner
M.; Gibson, William; Johnston, William; Tapawan-Conway, Zenaida G.;
'jogata@energy.state.ca.us'; 'mjaske@energy.state.ca.us';
'stomashe@energy.state.ca.us' <mailto:'stomashe@energy.state.ca.us'> ;
'vschwent@energy.state.ca.us'; 'jonathan.teague@dgs.ca.gov';
'jgrau@energy.state.ca.us'; 'jgopal@energy.state.ca.us'
Subject: Upcoming Scheduling PHC in R.99-10-025

Good afternoon everyone- I wanted to let you all know a bit more about what
I hope to accomplish at the 5/10 PHC for the DG proceeding. It is my hope
that we will leave the PHC with a planned witness order for the hearings.
Therefore, parties should come prepared to discuss witness availability and
cross estimates by witness. In fact, if you can provide estimates to me
informally prior to the PHC, I would greatly appreciate it.

Any work that the parties can do ahead of time to reduce to scope of issues
that require cross is appreciated. In the scoping ruling, Commissioner Bilas
directed that a case management statement be submitted consistent with Rule
49. We are looking forward to seeing that. In addition, I'd like you all to
consider offering panels of witnesses for cross in the event that you have
significant alignment of positions with other parties. This should reduce
the time required as well. We will not tolerate repetitive cross or friendly
cross, therefore, the parties with aligned positions should also consider
designating a representative to cross witnesses in order to reduce hearing
time. (If witnesses have corrections to their direct or rebuttal testimony,
these should be submitted in writing as an errata exhibit, whenever
possible, in order to reduce additional direct on the stand.)

During the hearings we will run 9-1 Tuesday-Friday, Mondays we will run
10-4. This gives us approximately 28 hours of cross time. If parties
estimates exceed this amount of time, the Commissioner and I will allocate
time accordingly.

In addition, at the PHC I intend to identify the direct and rebuttal
testimony with exhibit numbers so that we do not need to spend time doing
that at the hearing. We will also set a date by which any motions to strike
testimony are due.

I hope this information is helpful. See you in a couple of weeks!

Michelle Cooke
Administrative Law Judge
mlc@cpuc.ca.gov
415 703 2637


Bob,

You can address messages to me as:

Vince.J. Kaminski@enron.com   (not Kaminsky).

or

vkamins@enron.com.

Sorry for the confusion.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/27/2000
08:11 AM ---------------------------

Robert Brooks <rebrooks@earthlink.net> on 03/24/2000 12:05:58 PM
Please respond to "rebrooks@rbac.com" <rebrooks@rbac.com>
To: "'vkamins@enron.com'" <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: Returned mail: User unknown

Apparently this one doesn't work either.
Bob Brooks

-----Original Message-----
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem [SMTP:MAILER-DAEMON@earthlink.net]
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2000 9:56 AM
To: rebrooks@earthlink.net
Subject: Returned mail: User unknown

The original message was received at Fri, 24 Mar 2000 09:56:19 -0800 (PST)
from adsl-63-198-129-100.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.198.129.100]

   ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<Vince.Kaminsky@enron.com>

   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
... while talking to mailman.enron.com.:
>>> RCPT To:<Vince.Kaminsky@enron.com>
<<< 550 <Vince.Kaminsky@enron.com>... User unknown
550 <Vince.Kaminsky@enron.com>... User unknown

 - ATT00005.att
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Robert Brooks <rebrooks@earthlink.net>
To: "Vince Kaminski (E-mail)" <Vince.Kaminsky@enron.com>
Subject: FW: From powermarketers.com:  New England Natural Gas Growth
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 10:02:38 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

New England's Natural Gas Industry Reaches New Growth Levels
( March 23, 2000 )
(relayed by Bob Brooks, GPCM Natural Gas Market Forecasting System)
PROVIDENCE, R.I., March 23 /PRNewswire/ -- The natural gas industry in New
England continues its fast rate of growth, in terms of new customers and
new supply capabilities, industry and government leaders learned today at
The New England Gas Association's annual Energy Conference held at The
Westin Hotel in Providence.
Alfred P. Degen, chairman of The New England Gas Association, and chairman,
president and chief executive officer of Valley Gas Company, based in
Cumberland, Rhode Island, said: "The interest in natural gas has never been
stronger in New England. We look forward to continued growth in the years
ahead, to bring reliable, efficient, and cost-effective natural gas to
homes and businesses throughout the region."
This growth in New England is reflected in such developments as:
* A 25% growth in the region's pipeline infrastructure over the last year:
-- two new pipelines from Canada - the Portland Natural Gas Transmission
System (PNGTS), and the Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline from Nova
Scotia;
-- system expansions by the region's transmission and local distribution
companies;
* A new supply of liquefied natural gas (LNG) from the Caribbean:
-- the Cabot LNG Corporation's Atlantic LNG Project made first
deliveries to New England in May 1999;
-- LNG deliveries to New England in 1999 were more than double 1998
levels;
* There are more natural gas customers in New England than ever before:
-- NEGA reports that New England now has over 2.2 million natural gas
customers, from homeowners to small and large businesses;
-- The region's gas utilities reached a new record sendout of gas on
January 17, 2000, reaching 3.4 billion cubic feet (Bcf), a 13%
increase over the previous record.
"Over the past year," said Degen, "the New England natural gas industry
installed more new miles of pipelines than it has in decades. Whole areas
of New England are gaining access to gas for the first time, and the rest
of the region is receiving substantial new supplies as well."
The Conference was attended by more than 300 industry and government
officials. In his keynote address, Gary L. Neale, chairman, president and
CEO of NiSource, Inc., and chairman of the American Gas Association
(A.G.A.), reported on the national natural gas market projections found in
A.G.A.'s recent study, "Fueling the Future." Neale noted that increased
natural gas demand has multiple national benefits, including:
environmental, energy security, trade, and economic development.
NEGA, based in Needham, Massachusetts, was established in 1926. Its
membership includes all of New England's local natural gas utilities, the
interstate pipeline companies, a liquefied natural gas (LNG) importer, and
over 280 associate member companies. The natural gas utilities serve over
2.2 million customers in 490 communities in New England.


Missing a period after first para.  Otherwise OK.

kal

	Enron North America Corp.  From:  Michelle Lokay @ ENRON                           01/29/2001 01:37 PM

To:	Kal Shah/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	Re: TW Customer letter

Here's the final that you and I had talked about earlier.  Thanks.

---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Lokay/ET&S/Enron on 01/29/2001 01:36 PM ---------------------------

Susan M Scott@ECT
01/26/2001 03:41 PM
To:	Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kal Shah/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:	Carl Carter/NA/Enron@ENRON, Michelle Lokay/ET&S/Enron@Enron

Subject:	Re: TW Customer letter

I believe this was intended for Susan Scott in ETS...I am with Nat. Gas Risk Mgmt.   Thanks.

To:	Carl Carter/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:	Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle Lokay/ET&S/Enron@Enron
Subject:	Re: TW Customer letter

Michelle sent me the attached (different version) this morning for approval where she changed the first paragraph.  I've reviewed the original version Susan Scott just sent as well.  It appears that most of the changes were just spelling out "Transwestern."  I am ok with both versions as long as we have the July, 2000 date correct.  Please send me the final version that goes out for my records.

Kal Shah

Carl Carter@ENRON
01/26/2001 03:11 PM
To:	Kal Shah/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	TW Customer letter

You may want to check this out. Thanks.
Carl
---------------------- Forwarded by Carl Carter/NA/Enron on 01/26/2001 03:10 PM ---------------------------

Susan Scott
01/26/2001 02:52 PM
To:	Michelle Lokay/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Carl Carter/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject:	TW Customer letter

Michelle, as I mentioned in my voice mail, the other lawyers wanted a few changes.  My sincerest apologies for the confusion.  Apparently you and I were actually working off an old version of FGT's letter, not the one they ultimately approved and used.  Since you are out of the office, I've taken the liberty of forwarding it to Carl without you reviewing it first, since I know we want to mail this out soon.

Carl, Michelle advised me that EOL's lawyer had approved the previous version so I assume they will want to review this one as well.  Let me know if there are any concerns.

Thanks!

Susan (x30596)

<Embedded StdOleLink>
<Embedded StdOleLink>


Test works.? Thanks.
?
Anything else to do ?
?
Jack
----- Original Message -----
From:  Sharon Kimmel
To: Jack Tompkins
Cc: William W. Piernot ; William G.  Trulove ; Walter A. Saunders, Jr. ;
Robert  N. Dietz ; Ripley E.  Woodard, Jr. ; Ray Daugbjerg ; Rand R. Wall ;
R. Christopher Wyatt  ; Peter  Forbes ; Paul  Widener ; Michael Hensley ;
Marcus  Watts ; Leo Linbeck ; Lee Pardue, II ; Kyle Bergeron ;  Ken Lay  ;
Joel Tietjens ; Joe Richardson ; Jim  Wise ; Jere M.  Ahrens ; Jeff L. Murray
; James W.  Hargrove ; James Shirley ; Jack  Miller ; J.  Wise ; J.  P. Wise
; J.  Evans Attwell ; Frank Vandiver ; Doug  Bech ; Dennis McGuire ; David
Smith ; David Cullum  ; D. Stephen Goddard, Jr. ;  Charles W.  Hall ; Charles
Beall ; Bruce  J. Harper ; Bill Wright ; Barry G. Flynn ;  R.  Oliver
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 11:42  AM
Subject: TEST

?
Sharon


iNetEvents Witnesses Resurgence in Event Business in 2002

1/15/2002 9:00:00 AM

LOS ANGELES, Jan 15, 2002 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- iNetEvents, Inc. (IEVT)
today announced that it has seen a strong resurgence in business among its
existing clientele since the decline in activity and bookings of corporate
events caused by the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

iNetEvents is currently negotiating contracts with several previous customers,
including a major West Coast university. In addition, other important clients
including one of the country's largest banking institutions, the law enforcement
division of a leading technology company, and others have begun to rebook
previously cancelled events as well as book new events for 2002.

iNetEvents is also preparing to launch a series of new Online services that will
complement its existing service offerings and broaden its prospective customer
base.

Brandon Stauber, iNetEvents' CEO said, "While circumstances at the end of last
year were bad, we always knew that the overall corporate events market was
strong. We are now seeing this market return and we are ready to serve it with
our superior technology and service."
About iNetEvents, Inc.

iNetEvents, Inc., based in Los Angeles, (http://www.inetevents.com/) develops a
range of Web-based software applications designed specifically for the event
producer who plans conferences, expositions, seminars and corporate meetings.
The company's products enable the event producer to reduce administration
costs and time, enhance the attendee and exhibitor experience, and promote
greater interactivity.

CONTACT:           iNetEvents, Inc.
                   Brandon Stauber, 877/366-4638 or 310/889-9064
                   Fax: 310/889-9164
                   brandon@inetevents.com
                   www.iNetEvents.com
                   or
                   WPH Consultants, Ltd. (Investor Relations)
                   Philippe Niemetz, 800/477-7570 -- toll free
                   Phone: 212/344-6464
                   philippe.niemetz@wphconsultants.com

URL:               http://www.businesswire.com
Today's News On The Net - Business Wire's full file on the Internet
with Hyperlinks to your home page.
Copyright (C) 2002 Business Wire. All rights reserved.

_______________________________________________________________________
Powered by List Builder
To unsubscribe follow the link:
http://lb.bcentral.com/ex/manage/subscriberprefs?customerid=18044&subid=1FA33BB67DD2FC06&msgnum=6


Lauren:

(1)  Par. 3(xiii)  second and fourth lines:  the word "Guaranty" should be
replaced by the word "guaranty" and  the words "the Guaranty"  should be
replaced with "that guaranty", respectively.

(2)  Exhibit B Guaranty, first and final paragraphs:  change the date to
"March 19, 2001"

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	TeiglandL@sullcrom.com
	03/19/2001 01:21 PM

		 To: Sshackl@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Allegheny/Enron side letter re: ISDA Agreement

Sara, attached is a blackline which shows some minor changes we have made to
the above to fix some nits/clarify exhibit references.  Let me know if you
have any questions or comments.

 <<Allegheny  ENRON ISDA SIDE LETTER(v4).DOC>>

----------------------------------

This e-mail is sent by a law firm and contains information
that may be privileged and confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and notify us
immediately.

 - Allegheny  ENRON ISDA SIDE LETTER(v4).DOC


FYI

-----Original Message-----
From: "Fantz, Donald" <DIF1@pge.com>@ENRON@EES
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2000 2:34 PM
To: Cone, Rob
Cc: vanUlden, Dirk; Crevelt, Richard; "Kinert, Robert" <RCK3@pge.com>;
"Hagen, John H" <JHH4@pge.com>; "'Dick Smith@FSU'" <dicks@csufresno.edu>
Subject: RE: PG&E Detailed Study - CSUF

Rob,

Thank you for the opportunity to clarify.  There is no rule for fifteen days
per se.  Based on the date we delivered the final study to CSUF/Enron (Jan.
12, 2000), we would need an answer back in 15 days in order to have a
reasonable chance at making your stated schedule (as shared with us on
11/15/99 and re-stated on 1/5/00) for getting the new substation on line.
You actually have 60 days to respond.

In the Detailed Study, we requested a written notice to proceed by February
1, 2000 to make CSUF/Enron's target completion date for the new  substation
online.  CSUF/Enron can take up to 60 days, but doing so will impact the
desired schedule and necessitate a scheduling change.

Don Fantz
PG&E

> ----------
> From:  Cone, Rob[SMTP:Rob_Cone@enron.com]
> Sent:  Friday, January 14, 2000 4:16 PM
> To:  Fantz, Donald
> Cc:  vanUlden, Dirk; Crevelt, Richard
> Subject:  PG&E Detailed Study - CSUF
>
> Don
>
> Can you indicate the PG&E rule that requires a response to a Detailed
> Study within a fifteen day window after receipt of the Study?
>
> Rob Cone
>
> Project Manager
> Enron Energy Services
> 12647 Alcosta Blvd., Suite 500
> San Ramon, CA 94583
> Ph:925.543.3701, Fax:925.543.3550
> Pager:888.397.5826
>
>


[IMAGE]
[IMAGE] 	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE] Daren,    [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] TURKEY, FOOTBALL, AND A SIDE OF CASH?!? Wouldn't $25,000.00 make a nice early holiday gift? Treat yourself right this season and play the Fantasy Football Challenge!  Only one day left to play this week's challenge - don't miss your opportunity at over $28,000.00 in prizes!      [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] PLAY TO WIN! This week's prizes...  Perfect Lineup $25,000.00 1st Place $1,000.00 2nd Place $150.00 3rd Place $125.00 4th Place $100.00 5th Place $100.00 6th Place $25.00 7th Place $25.00 8th Place $25.00 9th Place $25.00 10th Place $25.00  PLUS GREAT LEAGUE PRIZES!  CLICK HERE TO PLAY!   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]  IT'S A NEW SEASON EVERY WEEK!   Guaranteed $1,000.00 Grand Prize!  Over $3,000.00 in Guaranteed Prizes!  Great League Prizes!   WIN $25,000.00 FOR THE PERFECT LINEUP! No catches, no gimmicks - simply pick the highest scoring player at each of the 11 positions this week and become $25,000.00 richer! Click here to get in the game today!    PLAY TODAY!! You have $100 million to build your team of 14 NFL players. Sack the competition in the best fantasy football game ever! Play the Fantasy Football Challenge  today!   Have a happy and safe Thanksgiving!   The Jackpot Sports Team     If you would rather not receive these messages, please  click here .  It will take up to 48 hours for your request to take effect.


Paul, can you have someone get back with FMC on the attached document for Agave?  thx

kh
-----Original Message-----
From: Miller, Jill [mailto:Jill.Miller@fmcti.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 1:21 PM
To: Hyatt, Kevin
Subject: AGAVE ENERGY COMPANY

Kevin,
I just spoke to you on the phone regarding a credit reference for Agave Energy Company.  I would appreciate it if you would fill out the attached form and return it to me.

Thank you,

Jill Miller
Accounting
FMC Energy Systems--Houston
Tel.  281-591-4152
Fax  281-405-4689


no changes

	Julia H Chin@ENRON
	09/25/2000 02:06 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject:

hi sara -- hope you had a good time in louisiana over the weekend!

i managed to lose my voice so i can only communicate by email for the time
being.  could you confirm that you have no changes to the enron agreement or
send me a mark-up?  if you want to give the changes to me verbally, i could
probably have a legal assistant help me ask you questions if i need to.
please let me know.

many thanks.