you are so mean.  why can't you be sweet like me?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, October 11, 2001 4:58 PM
To:	Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:	RE:

whatever, i know you were kidding, so was i.

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 4:58 PM
To: erichardson@sarofim.com
Subject: RE:

just kidding.  you need to relax a little.

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Thursday, October 11, 2001 4:50 PM
   To:     Lenhart, Matthew
   Subject:  RE:

   you are a jerk

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
   Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 4:51 PM
   To: erichardson@sarofim.com
   Subject: RE:

   i am going to the strip club.  do you want to meet me there?  i will get
   you a lap dance.

       -----Original Message-----
      From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
      Sent:   Thursday, October 11, 2001 3:38 PM
      To:     Lenhart, Matthew
      Subject:  RE:

       you'll be fine

      -----Original Message-----
      From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
      Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 3:34 PM
      To: erichardson@sarofim.com
      Subject: RE:

      i resent that too

          -----Original Message-----
         From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
         Sent:   Thursday, October 11, 2001 3:30 PM
         To:     Lenhart, Matthew
         Subject:  RE:

         why? it's true.  i resent the fact that you can't be honest with
   me

         -----Original Message-----
         From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
         Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 3:29 PM
         To: erichardson@sarofim.com
         Subject: RE:

         i resent that last comment

             -----Original Message-----
            From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
            Sent:   Thursday, October 11, 2001 3:25 PM
            To:     Lenhart, Matthew
            Subject:  RE:

            exactly, see, worthless.

            -----Original Message-----
            From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
   [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
            Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 3:22 PM
            To: erichardson@sarofim.com
            Subject: RE:

            i am gonna buy you a bmw

                -----Original Message-----
               From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
               Sent:   Thursday, October 11, 2001 3:19 PM
               To:     Lenhart, Matthew
               Subject:  RE:

               whatever, from now on i just won't listen to anything you
   say.
      i
            will
               consider everything that comes out of your mouth worthless.

               -----Original Message-----
               From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
      [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
               Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 3:07 PM
               To: erichardson@sarofim.com
               Subject: RE:

               it is so easy b/c you get all worked up and you are not sure
         whether
            to
               believe me or not.

                   -----Original Message-----
                  From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
                  Sent:   Thursday, October 11, 2001 2:55 PM
                  To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                  Subject:  RE:

                  you love trying to get on my nerves don't you?

                  -----Original Message-----
                  From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
         [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                  Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 2:50 PM
                  To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                  Subject: RE:

                  you have such a temper.

                      -----Original Message-----
                     From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>
   @ENRON
                     Sent:   Thursday, October 11, 2001 2:46 PM
                     To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                     Subject:  RE:

                     matt, it's cool.  i was just playing!

                     -----Original Message-----
                     From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
            [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                     Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 2:40 PM
                     To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                     Subject: RE:

                     just chill girl.

                         -----Original Message-----
                        From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>
      @ENRON
                        Sent:   Thursday, October 11, 2001 2:34 PM
                        To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                        Subject:  RE:

                        i'm not getting worked up, i was just typing a
      playful,
                  meaningless
                        email.
                        stop trying to pick a fight with me.

                        -----Original Message-----
                        From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
               [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                        Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 2:29 PM
                        To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                        Subject: RE:

                        it isn't that big of a deal.  why don't you just
   relax
         about
               the
                     whole
                        thing.

                            -----Original Message-----
                           From:   Erin Richardson
   <erichardson@sarofim.com>
         @ENRON
                           Sent:   Thursday, October 11, 2001 2:24 PM
                           To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                           Subject:  RE:

                           no, i'm not.  by the way, i broke down and told
      jenn
            about
               the
                     whole
                           bonnie
                           thing.  she doesn't think i look like her either
   so
         now i
            am
                     feeling
                           much
                           better no thanks to you.

                           -----Original Message-----
                           From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
                  [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                           Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 1:56 PM
                           To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                           Subject: RE:

                           no.  you are so gullable.

                               -----Original Message-----
                              From:   Erin Richardson
      <erichardson@sarofim.com>
            @ENRON
                              Sent:   Thursday, October 11, 2001 1:39 PM
                              To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                              Subject:  RE:

                              so, are you really "hitting the strip clubs"
         tonight?

                              -----Original Message-----
                              From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
                     [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                              Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 1:38 PM
                              To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                              Subject: RE:

                              ok

                                  -----Original Message-----
                                 From:   Erin Richardson
         <erichardson@sarofim.com>
               @ENRON
                                 Sent:   Thursday, October 11, 2001 1:36 PM
                                 To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                                 Subject:  RE:

                                 ok, enough.  this isn't funny anymore.

                                 -----Original Message-----
                                 From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
                        [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                                 Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 1:32 PM
                                 To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                                 Subject: RE:

                                 yeah.  i think we are hitting the strip
      clubs.

                                     -----Original Message-----
                                    From:   Erin Richardson
            <erichardson@sarofim.com>
                  @ENRON
                                    Sent:   Thursday, October 11, 2001 1:23
   PM
                                    To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                                    Subject:  RE:

                                    of course i am.  i am going out
   straight
      from
            work.
                  you?

                                    -----Original Message-----
                                    From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
                           [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                                    Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 12:35
   PM
                                    To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                                    Subject: RE:

                                    i am ready to go tonight.  you going
   out?

                                        -----Original Message-----
                                       From:   Erin Richardson
               <erichardson@sarofim.com>
                     @ENRON
                                       Sent:   Thursday, October 11, 2001
      12:30
         PM
                                       To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                                       Subject:  RE:

                                       shut up, stop lying.  i don't
   believe
      you
         at
               all.

                                       -----Original Message-----
                                       From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
                              [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                                       Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001
   12:29
      PM
                                       To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                                       Subject: RE:

                                       where didn't i go?

                                           -----Original Message-----
                                          From:   Erin Richardson
                  <erichardson@sarofim.com>
                        @ENRON
                                          Sent:   Thursday, October 11,
   2001
         12:24
            PM
                                          To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                                          Subject:  RE:

                                          where did you go?

                                          -----Original Message-----
                                          From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
                                 [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                                          Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001
      12:25
         PM
                                          To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                                          Subject: RE:

                                          no really.  it was a blast.
   little
         tired
            but
               i
                  can
                        rally
                              for
                                       tonight.

                                              -----Original Message-----
                                             From:   Erin Richardson
                     <erichardson@sarofim.com>
                           @ENRON
                                             Sent:   Thursday, October 11,
      2001
            12:21
               PM
                                             To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                                             Subject:  RE:

                                             liar

                                             -----Original Message-----
                                             From:
   Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
                                    [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                                             Sent: Thursday, October 11,
   2001
         12:22
            PM
                                             To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                                             Subject: RE:

                                             i didn't even go home

                                                 -----Original Message-----
                                                From:   Erin Richardson
                        <erichardson@sarofim.com>
                              @ENRON
                                                Sent:   Thursday, October
   11,
         2001
               12:19
                  PM
                                                To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                                                Subject:  RE:

                                                great, you don't stand a
      chance.
         i
               didn't
                     get
                        home
                              until
                                    5:30
                                          this
                                                morning
                                                and i think i was still
   drunk
         when i
               got
                  to
                        work.
                           how
                                 about
                                       you?

                                                -----Original Message-----
                                                From: Lenhart, Matthew
                              [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com]
                                                Sent: Thursday, October 11,
      2001
            11:58
               AM
                                                To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                                                Subject:

                                                how are we doing on our
      contest?

   **********************************************************************
                                                This e-mail is the property
   of
         Enron
               Corp.
                        and/or
                           its
                                    relevant
                                             affiliate
                                                and
                                                may contain confidential
   and
            privileged
                     material
                           for
                              the
                                    sole
                                       use
                                          of
                                             the
                                                intended recipient (s). Any
         review,
               use,
                           distribution
                              or
                                          disclosure
                                             by
                                                others is strictly
   prohibited.
      If
            you
               are
                  not
                        the
                                 intended
                                          recipient
                                             (or
                                                authorized to receive for
   the
               recipient),
                     please
                              contact
                                 the
                                          sender
                                             or
                                                reply
                                                to Enron Corp. at
                                 enron.messaging.administration@enron.com
                                    and
                                          delete
                                                all
                                                copies of the message. This
         e-mail
            (and
                  any
                              attachments
                                    hereto)

                                          are
                                             not
                                                intended to be an offer (or
   an
               acceptance)
                     and
                        do
                           not
                                 create
                                    or
                                             evidence
                                                a
                                                binding and enforceable
      contract
               between
                     Enron
                           Corp.
                              (or
                                 any
                                    of
                                          its
                                                affiliates) and the
   intended
            recipient
               or
                  any
                        other
                                 party,
                                    and
                                       may
                                             not
                                                be
                                                relied on by anyone as the
      basis
         of
            a
                     contract
                        by
                                 estoppel
                                    or
                                             otherwise.
                                                Thank you.

   **********************************************************************


I am sending this notification to your department to seek a solution of
halting and stopping inappropriate e mail materials which I am receiving.  I
have been requested by Louis Soldano, Enron attorney for the Gas Pipeline
Group, to apprise you of this situation.  The content of materials received,
I consider offensive, and am sure it would also be considered objectionable
and innappropriate by the standards of Enron Corporation.   Please be
advised, that many times it is  difficult to screen this material based upon
the headings and titles that accompany the contents.  Consequently,
innappropriate materials such as this are opened.  I have accidently opened
two such e mails by mistake and have received the "Enron warning"  that my
name and mailbox will be or may be audited in the future and that my name has
been placed in a file.    Because of this, I am extremely uncomfortable about
future accidents occuring and more importantly, about the increased frequency
and accessability of my e mail box to trash and questionable materials.

I would appreciate your immediate attention in this matter.  Thank you very
much.


Is Jeff available?

---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 05/24/2001
07:43 AM ---------------------------

Richard Shapiro
05/23/2001 03:17 PM
To: Lisa Yoho/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: NARUC Summer Committee Meeting

We should do it.,....and should check Ken or Jeff's availability.

From: Lisa Yoho on 05/23/2001 03:11 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: NARUC Summer Committee Meeting

Steve and Rick:

I just received a call from NARUC's meeting coordinator, and she is putting
together a panel of speakers to address "what is needed to achieve a balanced
energy policy" at the summer committee meeting.   The panel will consist of 2
state commissioners, a consumer "type", an environmental advocate, and an
energy CEO.  She is interested in having someone from Enron on the panel,
which is scheduled for July 16th in Seattle.

Are we interested in doing this?

Lisa


Yes please.  Jeff, I really appreciate it.
tom


Do you have this file?  It was last being worked by Flynn and St. Clair.
Thanks for looking.  Mary


Sara,

Is it possible to get a soft copy of the revised termination letter we discussed a couple of days ago?  We would like to see the paragraph referencing how the counterparty arrived to the calculated amount and the request for supporting list of transactions.

Thanks.
Nony


Hi Martin,
We have not received the executed copies for Contract No.'s
HUB210E14, HUB210E16
HUB210E20
HUB210E20 Amendment 1
HUB210E20 Amendment 5
HUB210E21, HUB210E23
HUB210E24
HUB210E24 Amendment 1
HUB210E25
HUB210E25 Amendment 1
HUB210E26, HUB210E27, HUB210E28, HUB210E29
HUB210E31 Amendment 1
HUB210E32 and HUB210E34
Could you tell me the location of these.
Thank you,

Nicole Sterling
Customer Support Assistant
Storage & Transportation
Email:  nsterling@uniongas.com
Phone: (519) 436-4600 Ext. 2734
Fax:   (519) 436-4645


Please see the attached update from Richard S. Shapiro, Managing Director,
Government Affairs-The Americas.


UCU: Energy Merchant Drives Strong 3Q Earnings; Aquila Transaction By Year
End

* This morning, UtiliCorp reported recurring operating EPS of $0.50,
in-line with our estimate, and a 8.7% increase from $0.46 in the year ago
quarter.
* Results exclude a $44 million or $0.30 per share gain from the IPO
of Uecomm, the telecom arm of their Australian subsidiary United Energy.
* Aquila energy merchant segment remains growth driver; EBIT up 87%
yr./yr., and now contributes 42.1% of UtiliCorp's earnings.
* Aquila expects to begin transacting in the high-growth bandwidth
commodity market in Q4:00 or Q1:01; we see Aquila as one of the
first-movers, behind  Enron and Dynegy (both rated 1H) in this nascent
market.
* We reiterate our 1H (Buy, High Risk) rating and $36 price target for
UtiliCorp.   We feel that a strategic transaction involving Aquila (i.e.
IPO, joint venture)-- expected by the end of the year-- will enable
UtiliCorp to extract Aquila's value as a leading Energy Merchant.
 <<trc75567.pdf>>

Raymond C. Niles
Power/Natural Gas Research
Salomon Smith Barney
(212) 816-2807
ray.niles@ssmb.com

s

 - trc75567.pdf


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 04/24/2000 12:49
PM ---------------------------

dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com on 04/24/2000 12:07:28 PM
To: " - *Kevin.Ruscitti@enron.com" <Kevin.Ruscitti@enron.com>, " -
*chris.germany@enron.com" <chris.germany@enron.com>
cc: " - *Molly.Johnson@enron.com" <Molly.Johnson@enron.com>, " - *Dalphon,
Charles" <cdalpho@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Scott, David"
<dscott1@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Bizik, Kim"
<knovsek@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Jones, Donna"
<djones1@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Destephanis, Kara"
<kdestep@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Boyd, Heidi"
<hboyd@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *cfrankl2@enron.com"
<cfrankl2@enron.com>, " - *joan.veselack@enron.com"
<joan.veselack@enron.com>, " - *vversen@enron.com" <vversen@enron.com>, " -
*cindy.vachuska@enron.com" <cindy.vachuska@enron.com>, " -
*cora_pendergrass@enron.com" <cora_pendergrass@enron.com>, " -
*mmitche2@enron.com" <mmitche2@enron.com>, " - *scott.goodell@enron.com"
<scott.goodell@enron.com>, " - *steve.gillespie@enron.com"
<steve.gillespie@enron.com>, " - *cgarcia@enron.com" <cgarcia@enron.com>, " -
*despey@enron.com" <despey@enron.com>, " - *joann.collins@enron.com"
<joann.collins@enron.com>
Subject: Updated May '00 FOM requriements

The attached file is an update to the original one sent on Friday with our May
daily volume requirements.   Please refer to the "comments" worksheet and the
comments dated 4/24/00 for differences between this version and the original.
Please let me know if you have questions, problems, etc.

Doug Kinney
Ph:  703-561-6339
Fax:  703-561-7317

 - May00_FOM_Req2.xls


Thanks!

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Tana,
Here are two of the four numbers.  I'll have the other two soon.

at 2993 the fax number is 713 853 9828
at 2945 the fax number is 713 646 3244


It's in the mail.  You should get it today.
Jen

>>> "Salisbury, Holden" <Holden.Salisbury@ENRON.com> 01/15/02 09:09AM >>>

Hello,

Any chance I could get a receipt for my September to January dues sometime today?  I can come down to get it if necessary.

Thanks,
Holden

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Hey

Just for the record I would like to make clear that I did not enter these
deals. Our new trader  uses my tradee id when I work with him.( He writes
entered by ......   in the comment section. I will point out the mistake to
him so we can make sure it does not happen again.

Geir


what do you want for it?


Vince,
See below for my picks based on the resumes.   The others marked as "no"
might be OK as well, but did not seem to have as much slant towards finance.

--Stinson

Vince J Kaminski
04/04/2001 03:45 PM
To: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Resumes

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/04/2001
03:45 PM ---------------------------
To: <Vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Resumes

Here are some people you might want to speak with .? Siriam lives in
Houston.? Please see the attached resumes of the following:
?
Karim Ashktorab   Yes (might be expensive?)
Stephen Liu    No
Farshad Ravanshad  No
Matthew Rusk   No
Samir Ranjan   Yes
Cedric Chow    No
Sriram Vasudevan  Maybe (already in Houston)
?
Regards,
?
Scott Gerson
Focus Capital Markets
71 Vanderbilt Avenue
Suite 200
New York, NY  10017
(212) 986-3344 Tele
(212) 986-3370 Fax
 - FOCUS SRIRAM VASUDEVAN.Doc
 - FOCUS CEDRIC CHOW.doc
 - FOCUS SAMIR RANJAN.doc
 - FOCUS MATTHEW RUSK.doc
 - FOCUS FARSHAD RAVANSHAD.doc
 - FOCUS STEPHEN LIU.doc
 - FOCUS KARIM ASHKTORAB.doc


When do you think they were going to tell us - after the meeting?
---------------------- Forwarded by Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT on 01/04/2001 05:41
PM ---------------------------

Mary Solmonson
01/04/2001 05:19 PM
To: Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Cavio Corporation

Thought you might also like to attend.

---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT on 01/04/2001
05:16 PM ---------------------------
From: Tommy Yanowski/ENRON@enronXgate on 01/04/2001 05:03 PM
To: Thomas D Gros/NA/Enron@Enron, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hal
Elrod/Corp/Enron@Enron, Marcus Pullicino/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Perkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Philippe A Bibi/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beth Perlman/ENRON@enronXgate, John
Pavetto/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Cavio Corporation

Below is a message from a company by the name of Cavio who specializes in
software that streamlines the settlements process.  More information about
their products can be found at http://www.cavio.com/.  They would like to
visit Enron and discuss the potential of partnering with us.  Essentially
they would charge our customers a fee for the process of clearing or settling
their transactions and share a portion of the revenue with Enron.  The
benefit to our customers is a reduced cost for letters of credit.

Bottom line is that they would like to meet with us and see if their is any
interest in trying to put something together.  Please let me know if you are
interested in being a part of the meeting and I will coordinate setting it
up.  Thanks!  -  Tommy
---------------------- Forwarded by Tommy J Yanowski/HOU/ECT on 01/04/2001
04:36 PM ---------------------------
To: "'tommy.j.yanowski@enron.com'" <tommy.j.yanowski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:

Dear Tommy,
Further to my phone message to you on Wednesday morning, I have great news.
It appears the last points have been ironed out and that CheMatch will be
going forward with the Cavio Solution.  Our CEO and VP of Sales will be
attending a meeting with CheMatch in Houston in mid to late January.  As
well, interest has been shown from the Natural Gas Exchange (www.ngx.com) and
Automated Power Exchange (www.apx.com).  From our discussions, it has become
apparent that these two sites currently deal with Enron at some level and
both agree that the Cavio Solution could effect a positive change in the lag
time currently seen for billing cycles (up to 55 days) as well as providing
other benefits.  I feel that with Enron and CheMatch setting a new standard
with Cavio, many of your current clients will be eager to join, and your
competition will be left behind.
Based on the fact that you had expressed interest in Cavio and Beta testing
the Cavio Solution for trades currently happening between Cheats and Enron,
I think that it may be an ideal time to plan a meeting with your team in
conjunction with our meeting with CheMatch.
Please advise as soon as possible.
Thanks.
Geoff Kershaw
Business Development Manager
Cavio Corporation
Phone   (604) 484-4700 Ext. 4713
Fax        (604) 484-4701
Email    gkershaw@cavio.com
Web       www.cavio.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)
and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized
review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the
intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all
copies of the message.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------


All spending that can be delayed needs to be delayed.	I want to make it clear that items for health, safety, security and reliability that need to be spent will be spent, if necessary, but all other spending needs to be slowed down as much as possible and delayed until further notice.   This is a directive I have just received from Stan.

Rod Hayslett
EB4054
713-853-6178

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Barnes, Caroline
Sent:	Wednesday, November 07, 2001 11:02 AM
To:	Hayslett, Rod
Subject:	Are we to stop IT spending on equipment upgrades????
Importance:	High

I am hearing all sorts of noise and need confirmation and guidance.  Phil Lowry just have Nick Rahn $2.7 mil to do various upgrades in the field, from server upgrades to phone switch upgrades as well as purchase the new software/hardware for the PHD rewrite. All are necessary upgrades if not done this year will have to be done next year.  Not one of these upgrades projects is over $900k but together it totals $2.7.  We also are continuing to do upgrades in the Houston offices - all budgeted items and if not upgraded this year will have to be done next year.  Do I say STOP - and if so for all companies or just for NNG and TW?   cvb


would you have any interest?

---------------------- Forwarded by Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT on 06/12/2001 06:02
PM ---------------------------
From: Basil Karampelas/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/29/2001 11:55 AM
To: Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Resume of Randy Balhorn

Greg - here is Randy's resume. He is the guy I was telling you about on
Friday as we were walking out of the building. I think he could make Enron a
lot of money.

Basil


who is there now, and do you have a list of grads, or others who have interviewed in the past?

-----Original Message-----
From: Marvin, Michele Nezi
Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2001 4:02 PM
To: Lebeau, Paul; Shankman, Jeffrey A.
Subject: Re: Any Suggestions?

Jeff,
Let us know If you have suggestions on a replacement. This is the second year in a row Kevin has backed out on interviewing at the last minute.  If we can't find anyone, we'll have to interview fewer people.  The replacement would need to fly to Phila Monday night and would get back late on Tue night.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


Hi Dutch,

This message is to confirm our meeting with you on, Thursday, November 1st
from 2:30pm - 4:30 pm, the location will be EB 3241 John Arnold's office.
Attendees will be Monica Brown.   (Let me know if it is okay for us to meet
in John Arnold's office)

Also, could you send me your homework assignment for me to review and place
into the ECW.  Sheri said that you were having problems inputting your
homework into the ECW.

I need to schedule sometime with you for next week, how does Tuesday,
November 5th from 3:30 pm - 4:30 pm sound.

Let me know if you have any questions or concerns, I can be reached at
713-345-6687.

Thanks,
Monica L. Brown
Accenture
Houston - 2929 Allen Parkway
Direct Dial: +1 713 837 1749
VPN & Octel: 83 / 71749
Fax: +1 713 257 7211
email: monica.l.brown@accenture.com

This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged or confidential information.  If you have received it in error,
please notify the sender immediately and delete the original.  Any other
use of the email by you is prohibited.


Patti,

Chris said you had problems gettting to the manual entry website.  The link is http://fundamentals.dev.corp.enron.com/admin/manualentry/

Socal Manual Entry is the correct pipeline to choose (a slight change from Socal).  Also, we need to start entering the Clay basin numbers under the Questar Manual Entry pipeline, however, Chris Hyde is working to set up the page so that a delivery and a receipt value can be entered.

Mat


oops


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Hollis Kimbrough/EWC/Enron on 03/12/2002
09:03 AM ---------------------------

Hollis Kimbrough
03/12/2002 08:51 AM
To: Bo Thisted/EWC/Enron@Enron, Mike Abbott/EWC/Enron@ENRON
cc: Jim Wallace/EWC/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Fw: Gear Box no. 19103, Trent Mesa WTG #79

Bo/Mike,

We can provide Jim the answers to item #1 and item #8.  We can provide a
partial answer for item #2 but we cannot give a complete answer since we do
not have VisuPro data all the way back to the commissioning date.  The
partial answer to #2 will center on total operational hours (SOT) and the
capacity factors by month.

We do not have any visibility into item #10 so we are unable to help on that
one.

I understand a similar request for information will be coming in for turbine
#30.  We should be able to provide answers for those questions as well.

Best Regards,
Hollis
---------------------- Forwarded by Hollis Kimbrough/EWC/Enron on 03/12/2002
08:56 AM ---------------------------

Jim Wallace
03/12/2002 08:12 AM
To: Hollis Kimbrough/EWC/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Fw: Gear Box no. 19103, Trent Mesa WTG #79

Hollis
I have not reviewed any information from the  site.  Can you help.
Thank you
---------------------- Forwarded by Jim Wallace/EWC/Enron on 03/12/2002 08:34
AM ---------------------------

Jim Wallace
03/08/2002 04:25 PM
To: Bo Thisted/EWC/Enron@Enron, Mike Abbott/EWC/Enron@ENRON
cc: Jodi Bello/EWC/Enron@Enron, Dan Lindquist/EWC/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Fw: Gear Box no. 19103, Trent Mesa WTG #79

Mike
I need the following information per Eickhoff request that is in highlighted
Black. Items 1, 2, 8 and 10 ASAP.  Quality Control Team will Inspect items 3,
4, 5, 6, 7 and 9.
If you have any question please call.
661-823-6507 or cell 661-333-2254

---------------------- Forwarded by Jim Wallace/EWC/Enron on 03/08/2002 04:09
PM ---------------------------

Dan Lindquist
03/08/2002 07:10 AM
To: Jim Wallace/EWC/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: Fw: Gear Box no. 19103, Trent Mesa WTG #79

Jim,

Please work with the field to assure that the below request is satisfied.

DJL

Jodi Bello
03/07/2002 06:30 PM
To: Jim Wallace/EWC/Enron@Enron
cc: Val Artman/EWC/Enron@Enron, Dan Lindquist/EWC/Enron@Enron

Subject: Fw: Gear Box no. 19103, Trent Mesa WTG #79

---------------------- Forwarded by Jodi Bello/EWC/Enron on 03/07/2002 06:44
PM ---------------------------

"K.D. Meyer" <kdmeyer@eickhoff-bochum.de> on 03/07/2002 09:39:29 AM
To: <Jodi.Bello@enron.com>
cc: <huub.gierveld@enron.com>, <werner.porsch@enron.com>, "Eickhoff Corp."
<eickhoff@bellatlantic.net>

Subject: Fw: Gear Box no. 19103, Trent Mesa WTG #79

?
important :?? pl. make sure that  an oil sample will be sent  to?_ickhoff
??? ???  ??? ??? ??? with the  gearbox?
???????????????????
?
----- Original Message -----
From: K.D.  Meyer
To: Jodi.Bello@enron.com
Cc: Eickhoff Corp. ; werner.porsch@enron.com ; huub.gierveld@enron.com
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 5:58 PM
Subject: Re: Gear Box no. 19103, Trent Mesa WTG #79

?
?
we have received the field action request ref.  #01459 c/w 4 photos.
?

the gearbox must be left locked down
the gearbox must be returned to Eickhoff Germany  for repair and
investigating the cause of damage immediately
we request answers to our following  questions:

?

what is the date of commissioning of WTG #  79?
no. of operating hours at???  nominal load??? and at partial load
are all teeth of the gearwheel damaged or a  segment only?
does the pinion show comparable damage ?
is a bearing damage visible ?
are deformed components or casing parts visible in  the surroundings of the
affected gear stage?
is it possible to get photos of the surface  structure?with higher resolution
?
for damage diagnosis we require detailed WTG data  of the last 7 operating
days, particularly of the last 24 hours before  stop,??i.e. gearbox temp. and
speeds, power, wind speeds,
are metallic particles in the filter?
we need? the torque measurement results?  of the reference gearbox in Trent
Mesa

?
as the undersigned will be absent next week, pl.  send copies of
communication to Dr. Frank Krull, engineering office
fkrull@eickhoff-bochum.de
?
?
regards
Eickhoff Maschinenfabrik GmbH
Bochum,  Germany
Klaus-D Meyer
ph???? +49 234 975  2362
fax??? +49 234 975 2579
e-mail?? kdmeyer@eickhoff-bochum.de


Anita,

Good decision.

Vince

Anita DuPont@ENRON
02/23/2001 12:13 PM
To: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Approval for Paulo Issler

FYI:  Carolyn needed approval today for charges relating to Paulo's Green
Card Process.  Mike was the only VP here today so I asked him to approve
them.  Hope that was alright.  Anita
---------------------- Forwarded by Anita DuPont/NA/Enron on 02/23/2001 12:06
PM ---------------------------

Mike A Roberts@ECT
02/23/2001 11:04 AM
To: Carolyn Wedel/ENRON@enronXgate @ ENRON
cc: Anita DuPont/NA/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Approval for Paulo Issler

Carolyn,

Approval to post the attached charges for  Paulo Issler is granted.

Mike Roberts
V.P. Research


Love you too.  I wrapped Mom's present.  It is ready for you ton pick up.
Gave Mom your allowance this morning.  Sorry I forgot o9ver the weekend.
Dad


This e-mail is to confirm what we discussed and decided at today's trading meeting.  Going forward, we are splitting the fundies meeting into two parts.  The first part will be from about 1 until 1:30 with Tim H. reviewing all of the routine fundamental slides.  The second part of the meeting will include only the people on this e-mail.  During that part of the meeting, which will run from approximately 1:30 until 2:30, we will discuss specific trading matters.

If there is anyone who works for you that has been going to the fundies meeting but will not be attending the smaller trading meeting please let them know about the new approach.  We remain committed to sharing the fundies information with a broad group people while trying to create a time and place where the smaller trading team can talk through trading issues.

Thanks,
Tim


Hey Guys-

There are three trades done with Mike Maggie through Elite Brokers on
05/09/01.
The counterparty is Axia Energy and these deals are not in TAGG-

ENA sells Call; 500,000 vol
 .81 premium
4.55 strike
March 2002

ENA buys Put; 500,000 vol
.81 premium
4.55 strike
March 2002

ENA buys Call; 2,000,000 vol
.8850 premium
4.70 strike
February 2002

ENA sells Put; 2,000,000 vol
.57 premium
4.15 strike
May 2002

Axia shows these premiums due to them tomorrow-
Please let me know

THX
jennifer


We sold the 1533 / day to Allegheny - deal 459226.  This is back on a month
to month basis.  We don't know if we are selling them gas for Dec yet.


Matt:

Thanks for the quick turnaround.

I have only a few comments to the draft request for advice to Kim & Chang:

1) I think you should clarify that the servers for EOL are located and
maintained outside Korea.

2) I think you should mention that in other jurisdictions we have reviewed
(e.g., US, Australia) for the legality of weather derivatives, counsel has
advised us that the instruments are not likely to be treated as insurance
contracts.  This is primarily because the payout is not linked to a casualty
event as would be the case in an insurance contract.  David Minns may have
additional language to add here.

3) Under Weather Derivatives, delete "Osaka" and replace with "Australia".

4) Just a point of clarification, but as currently envisioned by the Korean
commercial team (e.g., Chris Hunt, Jae-Moo and Michelle Lee) when we met with
them here in Houston earlier this week, financial derivatives (e.g., interest
rate, f/x) would not be traded online with Korean counterparties. Basically,
any financial derivatives that would be traded would involve personnel likely
located in Japan entering into via phone (e.g., conventional means) an
interest rate hedge or f/x hedge with a Korean financial counterparty in
order to facilitate the management of the risks carried in Enron Corp.'s
global financial risk book in Houston. This would just be an extension of the
services that would be performed by Enron Japan on behalf of Enron.
Accordingly, I think we need to delete the "On-Line Financial Derivatives"
portion of the draft request b/c I think the analysis captured in the earlier
memos from Kim & Chang generally addresses this type of derivative activity.
If you think otherwise, please adjust the request appropriately.

4) As to ECTRIC's GTCs, I think you should just attach the collateral version
for now.

Susan : Do you have any comments to add to the request for advice from a tax
perspective?

I have also copied David Minns on this note to keep him apprised of this
request b/c of the Weather Derivatives piece.

Matt, assuming you receive no further comments internally, I think you should
go ahead and finalize the request and e-mail to Kim & Chang for their review
by the end of this week.

Regards, Alan

	Matthias Lee
	06/28/2000 07:30 AM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edmund
Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Nony Flores/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angeline Poon/SIN/ECT@ECT, John
Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Draft EOL Legal Survey Korea

Alan/Mark/Edmund

Attached is a first draft EOL Legal Survey on Korea addressed to Kim & Chang
for your comments/approval. Also attached are the Annexes thereto for your
easy reference.

I understand the products to be posted online are Weather Derivatives out of
Enron Australia, Financial Derivatives out of Enron Japan and Commodity
Derivatives out of Enron Singapore.

I thought it sufficient to attach for Kim & Chang's review ECTRS's EOL GTC
(with Collateral) as the operative GTCs for Commodity Derivatives. Please let
me know if you think the without collateral version should be forwarded as
well.

I have also assumed that Enron Japan's GTCs for Financial Trades will be
substantially simialr to ECTRS's GTCs. Again, please advise if otherwise.

There is some reference to a more general memorandum on derivatives trading
that Kim & Chang produced in 1996 and updated in 1999. I have attempted not
to repeat questions that were already answered by Kim & Chang (in an attempt
to save some cost) particularly on general issues of Financial and Commodity
Derivatives, choice of law, dispute resolution etc.  which I thought were
quite extensively covered. But I did request for clarification of some issues
which I thought would be relevant to this exercise.

I have already contacted Kim & Chang to give them a "heads up". IR Huh has
confirmed that he and SK Hong would be available to attend to our request.

Edmund, if you do not have the 1999 updated memorandum, let me know and I'll
fax one across to you.

Thanks and regards
Matt


Attached are the contract drafts for the restructure. I have a hard copy of
the old contract, which I will forward to you shortly. Vlady.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Anderson, Neil
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 11:12 AM
To: Gorny, Vladimir
Subject: Revised SBC Documents

per your request.
neil
---------------------- Forwarded by Neil Anderson/HOU/EES on 06/11/2001 11:11
AM ---------------------------

	Enron Energy Services  From:  Andrew Wu                           06/11/2001
08:39 AM Phone No: 713 853-0504

To: Eric Letke/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Dan
Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Sean A Holmes/HOU/EES@EES, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Evan
Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Beth Apke/HOU/EES@EES, Neil Anderson/HOU/EES@EES, James
Hachen/Enron@EnronXGate, Denise Furey/Enron@EnronXGate
cc: Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Robert C
Williams/Enron@EnronXGate, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, jklauber@llgm.com
Subject: Revised SBC Documents

Attached to this email pls find clean and revised documents for SBC.  These
versions incorporate the various conversations through Friday p.m.  As we are
getting quite close to final form, pls provide any last-minute comments or
questions.

AW


Good morning.

I didn't wake Paige up this am.  I told Michael he could wake her up when he
wanted to, which I presume didn't take long.

It feels good to be back.  Last week really wasn't a very good week to take
off, and I was really stressed. It helps knowing that I have a holiday in two
weeks!  I'm glad, since Michael is off then as well.

Did you make friends with your venison (or was is pork)?

Love,

Kay


----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 10/05/2000 12:44 PM -----

	Office of the Chairman@ENRON
	10/05/2000 07:55 AM

		 To: ClickatHome mailout
		 cc:
		 Subject: A Computer and Internet Connection for You and Your Family
 Office of the Chairman
As you know, technology is critical to Enron; it drives our success and will
continue to do so in the future. Technology has helped Enron create new
businesses like Enron Broadband Services and Enron Net Works, and it is
responsible for applications such as EnronOnline and EnronCredit.com.  You,ve
seen what technology can do at work.  Now we want you and your family to
realize its benefits at home.

With that in mind, we are excited to let you know that we are introducing the
ClickAtHome
program, which will give each employee a computer for use at home. Where
technology permits, we will also subsidize an Internet connection. With the
click of a mouse, a home computer plus Internet access will put a world of
Internet knowledge at your family,s fingertips.

We have just signed an agreement with Dell Computer Corporation to provide
the computer hardware. We wanted to let you know about the program now in
case you and your family were considering the purchase or upgrade of a home
computer or Internet connection in the next few months. The scope of
ClickAtHome includes the following:

? Basic package: Dell desktop computer with a high-speed processor, floppy
disk drive, mouse, speakers, monitor, modem, CD-ROM drive and Windows 2000
software. Employees will have the option to receive a subsidized Internet
connection, including broadband, where commercially available.
? Participation: This program will be available to active regular full-time
and regular part-time employees of Enron and its wholly owned subsidiaries;
however, employees of some Enron companies (Portland General Electric, EOTT,
Enron Facility Services) may not be able to participate due to legal,
accounting, tax, labor or business reasons.  Eligibility includes being
employed at the time of implementation.
? Timing: U.S. employee sign-up will begin in early 2001, with delivery of
the equipment and Internet connection to follow shortly thereafter.  Delivery
of equipment to participating non-U.S. employees is targeted for late 2001.

Details about this program are still being finalized.  To address some of
your initial questions, we,ve posted a question-and-answer document on
http://clickathome.enron.com.  We will schedule an eSpeak session in the near
future where you will have an opportunity to ask questions. Or, you can
submit your questions and comments to ClickAtHome@enron.com.

We are excited to extend our investment in technology to you and your
family.  We believe this program takes communication at Enron to a new level
by creating endless possibilities for you to experience and participate in
the broadband Internet revolution. It is just another reason why we believe
Enron is a great place to work.


Hi Vladi

UBS have informed me they would like the additional information from you.   Please forward to me in a Word Document electronically as soon as possible.

-Job title/description for offered position in the U.S.

Regards,

Karen.


(See attached file: ng060502.pdf)

This message and any attachments (the "message") is
intended solely for the addressees and is confidential.
If you receive this message in error, please delete it and
immediately notify the sender. Any use not in accord with
its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole
or partial, is prohibited except formal approval. The internet
can not guarantee the integrity of this message.
BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not
therefore be liable for the message if modified.

                ---------------------------------------------

Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le
"message") sont etablis a l'intention exclusive de ses
destinataires et sont confidentiels. Si vous recevez ce
message par erreur, merci de le detruire et d'en avertir
immediatement l'expediteur. Toute utilisation de ce
message non conforme a sa destination, toute diffusion
ou toute publication, totale ou partielle, est interdite, sauf
autorisation expresse. L'internet ne permettant pas
d'assurer l'integrite de ce message, BNP PARIBAS (et ses
filiales) decline(nt) toute responsabilite au titre de ce
message, dans l'hypothese ou il aurait ete modifie.


Dear Vince,
?
I just wondered whether you have had chance to  look at your bullet points
and bio for the maths course. If so please could  could email them to me as
soon as possible. Could you also let me know whether  your company
affiliation should now be Enron North America.
?
Thanks Vince and best regards,
?
Vicky


Your office can open up the attached file to view  our tracking as of last
night.

Please call with questions.

?

The ch 2 survey had a wider spread but I don't  think it is accurate (63-36).

The Chronicle will be calling tomorrow with their  poll numbers. Their poll
is a creation of Dick Murray and Bob Stein. I would  expect them to show us
in a much tighter race. These guys are not always  accurate (remember their
60-40 against poll on baseball in '96).


498837 not apb

499013  should be 180.00

thanks


Can we create a San Juan phys for Oct bidweek?  What did we decide with this
product - swing only?  If we do, I would like to link it to the basis plus
nymex, or to the fixed price gas daily (fixed price gas daily will be rolled
out during bidweek this month because of our risk in gd basis going
forward).  I want to roll the Inside Ferc phys points out during bidweek 7-4,
as defined by Inside Ferc, last trade is mid.  The NGI index points will be
out 7 to 4 during bidweek, as defined by NGI.

We will plan on sending the data to both index publications.  Time open to
market, time of actual trade, counterparty, price, etc.  This will be
considered their last opportunity to be accurate or we will decline to
participate until their numbers are audited.

Thanks,
Mike


PennFuture's E-cubed is a commentary biweekly email publication concerning the current themes and trends in the energy market.
---------------------------------
September 26, 2001
Vol. 3, No. 18

Straight to the Source

Last year when PECO Energy and Unicom merged to form Exelon it was big news. Importantly, the merger settlement provided $32 million to fund the development of renewable energy in Pennsylvania.

This year, the company's wholesale trading and marketing unit, Power Team, presented renewable energy advocates with a big surprise - signing long-term contracts to purchase the output of three new wind farms in Pennsylvania. These contracts were not required as part of the merger settlement, and are not included in the $32 million earmarked for renewable energy funding.

Now a key force in renewable energy development in the East, the Power Team contracts are essential to bringing 78 MW of generation online from these new wind farms, two of which will be operational next month. The 15 MW Mill Run wind farm is scheduled to being operation next week, and the 9 MW Somerset wind farm is scheduled to begin commercial operation the following week.

Mike Freeman, the Power Team trader who made the burgeoning wind energy business in Pennsylvania possible, gave us some insight into Exelon's renewable energy commitment as well as how wind energy can be integrated into America's power grids.
---------------------------------
What's in Power Team's renewable portfolio?
We have 525 MW of hydro that is not pumped storage, 150 MW of wind, 100 MW of landfill methane, 35 MW of Municipal Solid Waste, 20 MW of wood waste, and 16 MW of scrap tires.

All of the wind is Green-e certifiable as "new" resources. All of the landfill methane is qualified under Green-e, but only 10 MW is new generation. Of the hydro, all of the generation is in larger projects that have been or are eligible for certification under the low-impact hydro standards. The MSW and tire projects are not qualified under Green-e, but the biomass plant is.

Why is Power Team developing a renewable portfolio?
There were two principal reasons: a perceived demand for renewable energy products in the wholesale marketplace, and a desire to diversify our portfolio from the perspectives of fuel, emissions, and cost.

Was there internal resistance or other issues to overcome?
I think the initial reaction was that renewable projects would be a very minor sidelight to our overall business. I don't think many people paid attention to the implications of renewable portfolio standards or external corporate mandates for renewable purchases. Part of the hands-off approach was due to, I believe, a sense that renewable products only meant the re-packaging of existing generation, not changing the power system in any way.

Over time I think many people got comfortable with the idea that the creation of products potentially could initiate new projects that would change the power system. For me that's the most important part of our participation - to help encourage new development. I also think that management began to get comfortable with the idea that renewable energy products could be profitable, and that demand for these products could be sustaining.

Will this encourage new development?
Generators get a creditworthy counter-party that is not only willing to buy all of the energy at the generator location, but is also willing to talk about additional new projects. Over time, other market intermediaries such as power marketers and retail suppliers may become interested in doing the same. If this chain of events occurs, I think we may even see renewable credits traded over the counter, just like other energy products now.

How do renewables fit into Power Team's overall business strategy?
We are a growth company and are constantly in search of ways to sensibly increase our overall generating portfolio. So bringing on new renewable generation into our supply mix really is part of that overall strategy. More specifically, we believe there is sustainable demand for renewable energy, not only because of mandates such as renewable portfolio standards, but also because of natural demand. The average person may not think of it this way, but in supporting the idea of paying a premium for renewable energy I think that people implicitly are accepting the notion that renewable energy is an essential component of how we as a country intend to manage our future energy requirements.

Why Wind?
There's no question that the momentum for wind projects began to build as a result of the PECO restructuring and merger settlements, under which PECO provided funds for new wind projects. A second reason is that the forward electric markets began a steep upward climb beginning in 1998, and especially the off-peak power market beginning in 2000 and continuing into this year. A third reason was the rapid increase in electric demand in the last five years, and a realization that we need to develop a wide-ranging set of answers to meeting the demand, including supply-side and demand-side solutions. We felt that wind generation could play a role on the supply side while meeting what seems to be a growing demand for renewable sources.

What are the primary financial considerations for a wind deal?
The first is probably the need for a long-term contract. Wind generators typically want to enter into fixed-price, long-term agreements to make it easier and cheaper to borrow money and to provide a stable revenue source over a long period. We don't have a problem with long-term deals per se, although we do want to emphasize diversity in our contracting as well. We don't want to hold multiple long-term agreements and nothing else.

In my discussions with generators so far, there has been some flexibility on contract length. In fact, our willingness to enter into a long-term contract is perhaps the key ingredient to getting a wind project financed and built. Beyond the long-term contract, the wind developers want to do business with a creditworthy company that has an investment-grade rating. Exelon Generation is rated A- by S&P so we are a natural counter-party for project financing. Right now, there are not very many long term buyers out there with the kind of credit-worthiness that we have.

Will that always will be the case?
No. If we're right about long-lasting demand, I think other large companies, including distribution companies, will participate in the purchase of energy from these projects. We've teamed up with a retail marketer, Community Energy, to stimulate demand and market wind energy in ways that will move companies to buy it. In the development of conventional generation, it is not always necessary to enter into 20-year agreements for a project to get built. For example, a developer may want to hedge off a portion of the output on a long-term basis but will be willing to sell the rest of the output for shorter periods. And in some cases, the financing source may be comfortable with a shorter-term agreement for the whole thing.

Is there a financial advantage for wind?
If one's view is that the future value of energy is higher than the present value, a generation source with no fuel risk obviously is good to have. Wind has one key advantage over other resources - perpetual availability without any fuel costs or price volatility. This helps mitigate the other risks that wind does present.

It is of course difficult to predict what will happen even in the near term. But I am a believer in broad trends or cycles that are relatively easier to project, outside of significant advances in technology. Over a long period of time, 15 or 20 years, I think the probability of fixed-price wind energy riding out the low cycles while providing a greater amount of benefits in the high cycles is higher than the opposite.

I do believe that the demand for wind generation will be sustained at a moderate premium over generic electricity prices for the next 15 to 20 years.

Is it difficult to integrate wind into your portfolio?
With conventional generation and firm transmission paths, a power marketing entity such as Power Team can bring its resources to the highest markets, whether they are hourly, daily, monthly, or longer. Such transactions are supported by a complex communications network that notifies transmission providers of the timing, amount and ultimate sink of expected output.

The contracts that we enter into on conventional generators depend to a great extent on economic structures that ensure as much as possible that the generator will fulfill our dispatch schedule as close to 100% of the time as possible, so we can avoid the punitive imbalance fees that transmission providers impose when delivered energy doesn't match scheduled energy. The approach we take on wind generation must be quite different, because wind plants provide intermittent output that is difficult to predict within reasonable boundaries of accuracy.

I think the serious wind developers know we are serious about incorporating wind energy into our portfolio. We're one of the biggest physical movers of power in the country and have a significant amount of assets - that must count for something in terms of our ability to more easily integrate a 50 MW wind project into our overall mix.

How does intermittent generation add complexity?
A wind farm generates electricity when the wind blows, not when you flip the switch on. It takes a lot more than I expected to accommodate intermittency, even for an experienced organization like ours, because the transmission system and the operational rules and procedures were not developed with wind generation in mind. You don't have the ability to give transmission providers real-time information for purposes of regulating the system between supply and demand.

In PJM, where generators can offer increments of generation on a day-ahead or real-time basis, and receive (or pay) market-clearing prices depending on actual generation, wind energy can be offered into the system in one of several different ways without experiencing significant imbalance penalties. An obstacle, and we're working with PJM on this right now, is that PJM as the transmission provider typically requires no shorter than 20-minute notice when self-scheduled or must-run generators expect to produce electricity or expect to stop producing electricity. For purposes of regulating the system, PJM then has the ability to tell the self-scheduled generator to go ahead and generate, or to hold off until the energy is needed as a result of the real-time balance of supply and demand.

This will not be practical with wind generation. We'd literally have to assign a trader to the task of monitoring highly suspect expected output from our wind plants and then calling PJM every hour to determine what to do. In the must-run scenario, we'd still have to notify PJM of expected output so PJM can regulate the system with other generators. Either way, we'd have to predict output, which is a dicey
proposition.

Does that make wind generation unreliable?
Not at all. We've got excellent modeling to predict the output from wind generation over a longer period of time, such as a full year. Those predictions underlie our contracts. But it's another thing to tell the wind when to blow. The wind energy industry is working on this from the perspective of improved wind forecasting and a more automated approach than what I've described. In PJM, a 54,000 MW system, this may not seem to be a problem when there is only about 25 MW of wind generation in the system right now, but PJM wants to institute market rules that will be appropriate for a larger amount of wind generation when it arrives. A certain magnitude of wind generation will cause PJM to change the way it now regulates the system.

The complexity cannot be underestimated and we will be part of the solution.

How can scheduling and other rules  better accommodate intermittent resources like wind?
An alternative is for the transmission provider to model the output from a wind plant as "negative" load instead of generation. Which is to say, when the plant is generating electricity, the system load will be reduced by the amount the plant is generating. When the plant is not generating, the load will increase. A tradeoff of that approach is that load typically pays ancillary services expenses such as regulation and spinning reserve. In this unique circumstance, which of the ancillary services apply to negative load, and at what level? We're working with PJM on these questions.

I'm uncertain whether a significant amount of so-called negative load will require any kind of real-time notice to the transmission provider. Of course the transmission systems are operated to react to the unpredictability of load, and one can view the unpredictability of wind generation in the same way. Other countries, and the western U.S. transmission systems, have figured out how to handle large amounts of wind generation, and so can we.

Are you working on other approaches?
Another possibility is to dynamically schedule the output from a wind plant that is situated in a control area without a real-time energy market, to a control area that does have such a market. The output signal from the plant would be available to the transmission provider in the second control area on an automated basis.  The output then becomes part of available supply from moment to moment. However, notice requirements would not be sidestepped with this approach.

Will PJM resolve these problems?
Yes. PJM is progressive and innovative, and has indicated to us that they are willing to work with us to find solutions to the scheduling/imbalance issue. It's hard now because we're breaking new ground. I expect that it will be much easier for the next projects developed.

How big might your renewable portfolio get? Will you keep signing more contracts for new projects?
As long as we continue to see demand for renewable energy, we'll continue to look at projects where there are energy markets whose long-term forward economics support the purchase of energy. I'd like to aggregate a significant amount of wind generation in a single market, such as PJM, to be able to provide PJM with a more diversified supply curve - with multiple projects it may be possible to smooth the output.

We need to do business with companies that have the financing and the organizational will to get these projects completed. We are looking to form relationships with companies that we can build on. If we execute a contract successfully, we'd like to apply the same concepts to additional projects with the same company. Examples of that are Atlantic Renewable Energy Corp. and National Wind Power.

What are some key developments to make the industry grow faster?
We need technological efficiencies to drive down the cost of the equipment, standardized approaches to the transmission of wind generation, financial innovations to allow more risk-sharing, and hybrid approaches such as wind and energy storage.

Perhaps most importantly, we need consumers to buy the wind energy!

---------------------------------
E-cubed is available for reprint in newspapers and other publications. Authors are available for print or broadcast.

PennFuture (www.pennfuture.org), with offices in Harrisburg, Philadelphia and Pittsburgh, is a statewide public interest membership organization, which advances policies to protect and improve the state's environment and economy. PennFuture's activities include litigating cases before regulatory bodies and in local, state and federal courts, advocating and advancing legislative action on a state and federal level, public education and assisting citizens in public advocacy.

To unsubscribe, simply reply to this email with "unsubscribe" in the subject.


It is officially on the way!  We will see how long it takes to get
distributed.  --Sally
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 01/17/2000 04:33 PM
---------------------------

Sharron Westbrook @ ENRON

01/17/2000 02:48 PM
To: Corp Notes Admin/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Global Risk Management Operations

The following memo needs to be sent to all Enron Employees from Rick Causey.

Recognizing Enron,s increasing worldwide presence in the wholesale energy
business and the need to insure outstanding internal controls for all of our
risk management activities, regardless of location, a global risk management
operations function has been created under the direction of Sally W. Beck,
Vice President.  In this role, Sally will report to Rick Causey, Executive
Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer.

Sally,s responsibilities with regard to Global Risk Management Operations
will mirror those of other recently created Enron global functions.  In this
role, Sally will work closely with all Enron geographic regions and wholesale
companies to insure that each entity receives individualized regional support
while also focusing on the following global responsibilities:

1. Enhance communication among risk management operations professionals.
2. Assure the proliferation of best operational practices around the globe.
3. Facilitate the allocation of human resources.
4. Provide training for risk management operations personnel.
5. Coordinate user requirements for shared operational systems.
6. Oversee the creation of a global internal control audit plan for risk
management activities.
7. Establish procedures for opening new risk management operations offices
and create key benchmarks for measuring on-going risk controls.

Each regional operations team will continue its direct reporting relationship
within its business unit, and will collaborate with Sally in the delivery of
these critical items. The Houston-based risk management operations team under
Sue Frusco,s leadership, which currently supports risk management activities
for South America and Australia, will also report directly to Sally.

Sally retains her role as Vice President of  Energy Operations for Enron
North America, reporting to the ENA Office of the Chairman.  She has been in
her current role over Energy Operations since 1997, where she manages risk
consolidation and reporting, risk management administration, physical product
delivery, confirmations and cash management for ENA,s physical commodity
trading, energy derivatives trading and financial products trading.

Sally has been with Enron since 1992, when she joined the company as a
manager in Global Credit.  Prior to joining Enron,  Sally had four years
experience as a commercial banker and spent seven years as a registered
securities principal with a regional investment banking firm.  She also owned
and managed a retail business for several years.

Please join me in supporting Sally in this additional coordination role for
global risk management operations.


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 01/29/2001 01:32 PM -----

	exchangeinfo@nymex.com
	01/29/2001 01:19 PM

		 To: tana.jones@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: (01-34) Margin Rate Change for Propane

Notice No. 01-34
January 29, 2001

TO:
ALL NYMEX MEMBERS AND MEMBER FIRMS
ALL NYMEX CLEARING FIRMS
ALL NYMEX OPERATIONS MANAGERS

FROM:     Neal Wolkoff, Executive Vice President

SUBJECT:     MARGIN RATE CHANGE

Effective Date:    Tuesday, January 30, 2001 (close of business)

Futures Contract:  Propane Gas Futures

Contract Months: All Months

Rate Change:
NYMEX Division Margins for Propane Gas Futures Contracts

Effective Date:    Tuesday, January 30, 2001 (close of business)

Clearing Member (Maintenance Margin):            Old:  $1,900  New:  $2,500

Member Customer (Initial Margin):                Old:  $2,090  New:  $2,750

Non-Member Customer (Initial Margin):            Old:  $2,565  New:  $3,375

Should you have any questions regarding these changes, please contact Arthur
McCoy at (212) 299-2928 or Joe Sanguedolce at (212) 299-2855.  This notice
supersedes all previous notices regarding outright margins for the NYMEX
Propane Gas Futures Contracts.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"
http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=tana.jones@enron.com&refdoc
=(01-34)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


I agree with your approach.  MHC

PS, I am out next week on vacation.  Call Twanda to arrange for assistance
while I am out, and she will refer you on.  Agreements will be done during my
absence; again, work with Twanda.  Thanks. Michelle

Amy FitzPatrick
08/10/2000 09:44 AM
To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: One Year Agreements

Basically, RD wants to hire someone and have that person make a one-year
commitment to the Company (this is someone that worked for them before and
left after a few months due to personal reasons).  Rather than doing any kind
of agreement, I have recommended to RD that we either do a signing payment
(full amount repaid if leaves within the year) or a retention payment as part
of the offer letter.

Are you comfortable with that?

Thanks!
Amy

Michelle Cash
08/10/2000 03:51 AM
To: Amy FitzPatrick/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: One Year Agreements

Amy, we do put people under contract with a definite term; however, at the
end of that term, the employee converts to an employee at will.  We also hire
consultants for a fixed term, but a year-long period for an individual is
pretty long for a consultng position.  What is the situation?  Maybe we can
find an alternative.

Michelle

Amy FitzPatrick
08/09/2000 06:12 PM
To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: One Year Agreements

Michelle -

Do we ever do fixed term offers?  I got a question today from RD Hawkins as
LasVegas Cogen asking if we could hire someone for a one year period of
time.  I know we can do it in the UK, just not sure about the US.

Thanks!
Amy


please see attached.
?
Rick Vicens
Delta Power Company, LLC
89  Headquarters Plaza
North Tower, 14th Floor
Morristown, NJ?  07960
(973) 993-1854 phone
(973) 326-1821 fax
rvicens@deltapower.com
www.deltapower.com
 - Letter of Intent (Delta Redline -1).DOC


The following servers will be coming down, please click on the icon for more
details and scheduled times :

-------------------------------------------------------------

          SYSTEM OUTAGE NOTIFICATION

-------------------------------------------------------------

FOR:  PR1 - Apollo Production

Outage Start: (CST) 5/20/2001 at 07:00:00 PM

Outage End: (CST) 5/20/2001 at 10:00:00 PM

Outage Abstract:  The outage will facilitate the upgrade of backup/restore
software.

Outage Description: The outage will facilitate the upgrade of backup/restore
software.

Outage Implication: Production SAP and eHRonline will not be available during
the outage.

Contact Name:Paul Calvino   #:  800-383-3929


Dear Vincent,  I'm Jay Rickerts, back from vacation feeling refreshed and rejuvenated - I hope everyone had a great holiday season.   ENL's Washington bureau is scheduled to sit down with Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Chairman Pat Wood on Tuesday. Washington Bureau Chief Peter Cook tells me he will ask Wood about some of the major issues facing the Commission in 2002.  Also, former FERC Commissioner Don Santa joins us during the 11:00 a.m. ET newscast to provide his insight on the future of the FERC. Peter also says the FERC will resume work Tuesday on the California refund case - we'll bring you an update.   The attorneys general of nine northeastern states are hosting a news conference regarding emissions policy on Tuesday.  Peter says the group is expected to warn the Bush administration their states will consider legal action against the federal government if a pending review of the nation's emissions rules leads to a relaxation of enforcement against power plants and refineries.  Join us for this report from the Washington bureau.   We've got more on the FERC for you from the Houston bureau on Tuesday.  Kim Benestante will speak with Gulfstream Communications Director Chris Stockton about his company's FERC filing.  We'll get details from Stockton during the 1:00 p.m. ET newscast tomorrow.   Also from Houston, Paragon Engineering Director of Business Development Barbara Thompson will join us at noon ET to discuss pipeline safety.  She'll bring us an update on the federal deadline coming up in March 2002 regarding "high-consequence areas" for pipelines.   Finally, Raymond James & Associates Managing Director Marshall Adkins says the current energy situation isn't like the last downturn in 1998, but more like the bust of 1972 - '73. Adkins will give us an explanation at 2:00 p.m. ET on Tuesday.   West Coast Correspondent Kym McNicholas will bring us an update Tuesday on the California legislature's return to session for 2002.  Kym also tells me California Governor Gray Davis' State of the State address is set for Tuesday evening.  Davis is expected to address last year's energy crisis in California and what they expect this year.   We'll also have more from California ISO Manager of Market Design Lorenzo Kristov as he talks to Kym about the ISO's new plan scheduled for release on Tuesday.  Don't miss these reports from Sacramento tomorrow.    Closing Prices for Monday, Jan. 7, 2002    Crude: $21.48/bbl -$0.14   Unleaded: $0.6234/gallon -$0.0050   Heating Oil: $0.5719/gallon -$0.0140   Gas: $2.272/mmBtu -$0.003   Keep in mind things are subject to change at a moment's notice. Occasionally guests have to reschedule or change time slots.  We'll continue to do our best to keep you updated on future interviews and events.   Be sure to watch our newscasts every business day - 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. ET, at the top of each hour.

	 	Jay Rickerts, EnergyNewsLive.com Anchor  View today's Energy Wrap Video Windows Media Player: 56K  | 100K  | 300K  Real Player: 56K  | 100K  | 300K  (Requires Windows Media Player or Real Player )   Experience all that Williams Energy News Live has to offer!   If you are receiving this letter for the first time and wish to continue,  subscribe now    To stop receiving this letter, unsubscribe now   If you are having trouble receiving this e-mail, please let us know or call (800) WILLIAMS (800-945-5426) weekdays, 7am-7pm CST.   Comments? Suggestions? Let us know  or call (800) WILLIAMS (800-945-5426) weekdays, 7am-7pm CST.   Copyright 2001 Williams Energy News Live, LLC. All Rights Reserved.


Names of the 5 people fired disclosed below:

5 State Energy Advisors Fired Over Conflicts Ethics: The consultants were
involved in buying electricity for California from a generator whose stock
they owned, setting up a clash of official duties, personal interests.
JEFFREY L. RABIN; DARYL KELLEY; RICH CONNELL
TIMES STAFF WRITERS

07/28/2001
Los Angeles Times
Home Edition
A-1
Copyright 2001 / The Times Mirror Company

The Davis administration, stung by charges of excessive secrecy, disclosed
late Friday that it has fired five energy consultants because of conflicts of
interest involving their official duties and personal finances.
A sixth consultant hired to help California purchase electricity has quit,
according to state records.
All were involved in purchasing electricity for the state from a generator
whose stock they owned.
In addition, the top lawyer for the agency buying the power was removed from
her position because of concern about the way the issue of potential
conflicts was handled.
Top advisors to Gov. Gray Davis told The Times that they learned of the
conflicts in the last week, after belatedly asking the consultants to file
required economic disclosure statements. A review of those documents, which
included stock holdings, showed that some of the consultants "may have
crossed the line," said the governor's senior advisor, Nancy McFadden.
State law prohibits officials from participating in decisions involving their
personal financial interests.
Although portraying himself as seriously concerned that such conflicts could
undermine public confidence, the governor has not required some of his most
influential private-sector advisors to file the kind of disclosure statements
that led to the firings.
Among them are two Wall Street veterans who have been most influential in
promoting the governor's energy rescue plan, which includes the largest state
bond sale in U.S. history.
The New York firms that employ executives Joseph Fichera and Michael Hoffman
have been paid $275,000 a month to, among other things, help pitch the
$12.5-billion bond issue to Wall Street analysts and state lawmakers. The
companies stand to make an additional $14 million if the state goes through
with the purchase of utility transmission lines.
Davis contends that Fichera, Hoffman and their associates fall into a
separate category of advisor, beyond the reach of the state's political
reform laws. Critics question the distinction.
"The governor's approach may be convenient for him," said Jim Knox, executive
director of the watchdog group California Common Cause, "but it ignores the
law."
Disclosure is crucial because the public needs to know that "decisions are
not being made by people who have a conflict of interest," Knox said. "Trying
to evade the law with a creative use of semantics is not what they ought to
be doing."
The firings disclosed Friday are unlikely to diminish criticism surrounding
the more than 50 consultants and advisors hastily hired by the administration
as it rushed into the power trading business this year.
More than $25 million is being spent by the state on consultants, according
to state records.
In the process, seemingly little attention was paid to routine government
ethics laws.
It took six months for state officials to direct the consultants to file even
basic disclosures of their personal finances, including investments. The
state Political Reform Act normally requires such forms to be filed publicly
within 30 days of starting work for state agencies.
Even with the hastily ordered disclosures made public thus far, the
circumstances of most of the stock transactions remain a mystery because key
information was omitted. Most of the consultants, for example, failed to
state when they bought the energy stocks.
One of those pressing hardest for an investigation of possible conflict of
interest violations and insider trading is Secretary of State Bill Jones, a
Republican who hopes to challenge Davis next year. Jones has accused the
governor of "a conscious policy of secrecy" in enforcing compliance with
public disclosure laws. This week Jones called for a federal Securities and
Exchange Commission probe of stock purchases by state energy consultants.
4 Traders Owned Shares of Calpine
The four traders removed this week all owned shares of Calpine Corp., a San
Jose-based power generator that has landed the largest share of the $43
billion in long-term state power contracts. Their investments ranged from
several thousand dollars to more than $100,000, records show.
While working for the state Department of Water Resources, officials said
they bought undetermined amounts of Calpine power on the state's behalf. More
than $14 million worth of electricity was purchased from the state by Calpine
in the first quarter of this year, according to the most recent records
available.
"We did not want them making governmental decisions and holding these
stocks," the governor's legal affairs secretary, Barry Goode, said in an
interview.
The highest-ranking consultant removed, Richard Ferreira, was hired on a
$500,000 contract in January to assist in obtaining bids for long-term power
and negotiating contracts, records show.
A former assistant general manager with the Sacramento Municipal Utility
District, Ferreira was paid $200 an hour by the state. After he disclosed
owning as much as $10,000 in Calpine stock, officials discovered he had
participated in a review of one of the company's contracts. Ferreira could
not be reached for comment.
The governor's office identified the other four as traders William F. Mead,
Herman Leung, Constantine Louie and Peggy Cheng, most of whom could not be
reached Friday by The Times.
All of them formerly worked as energy schedulers at the Power Exchange, a
now-defunct energy market similar to a stock exchange created in the early
days of California's electricity deregulation.
Hired by the state in February and March, the four signed temporary contracts
calling for maximum payments of between $15,000 and $21,000 a month,
including living expenses in Sacramento and flights home to Southern
California.
Mead, 55, a former Edison engineer, said state officials never warned him
that owning energy stock was a problem until they demanded that he sell the
stock a week ago.
He said he bought nearly all of his shares 2 1/2 years ago for $12,000 and
saw its value skyrocket as the stock split three times, doubling in value
each time.
Mead said he was called by the head of the state's energy buying team
Thursday and fired.
"I asked very directly, 'Is this because of the stock?' and they wouldn't
give me an answer," Mead said. "[He] just said your services are terminated.
"I came up here, away from home, living in a hotel room, trying to keep the
lights on, trying to get the state through a crisis and now I get a finger
pointed at me as if I'm some sort of criminal. I guess it's just politics and
we're the pawns."
Administration officials said they also are examining the actions of other
traders, including one who bought Calpine stock just before beginning work
for the state. That trader, Elaine Griffin, who also came from the Power
Exchange, left the state power buying operation July 14, three days after
disclosing her energy industry investment. Griffin, who the governor's office
said had obtained another job, could not be reached for comment.
Griffin reported purchasing $10,000 to $100,000 of Calpine stock on Feb. 1,
in her final days working at the electricity exchange.
A few days later, Calpine signed and announced a $4.6-billion, 10-year deal
to sell power to the Department of Water Resources.
On Feb. 20, Griffin joined the state power buying agency, just as the state
and Calpine were finalizing an additional $8.3 billion in power contracts.
One of those, a 20-year deal signed Feb. 27, was the longest.
The state has awarded Calpine about $13 billion in contracts to supply power
for up to 20 years.
In addition to the state consultants who bought Calpine stock, two others
reported owning stock in Texas-based power marketing giant Enron Corp. And
two more bought stock in Southern California Edison, the faltering utility
that Davis has committed himself to saving from bankruptcy.
Another consultant bought stock in Reliant Energy of Houston, a large power
plant operator that bought several California plants from utilities after
deregulation.
Bernard Barretto, an energy trader, who buys energy on the daily spot market,
said in an interview that he bought about $2,000 in Enron stock shortly
before he began work for the state Feb. 28.
Purchase of Enron Stock Defended
"I don't see a conflict," he said. "At the time, we weren't really dealing
with Enron. I [still] haven't bought from Enron."
Barretto said he never considered his Enron ownership a possible conflict
until he received notice July 18 that he had to sell the stocks by noon or
lose his job.
That notice came from Goode, the governor's lawyer.
"We expect and have always expected the state's consultants to uphold the
highest ethical standards," he wrote. "That standard is not met by those who
hold a financial interest in one or more energy companies while trading on
behalf of the state on energy related matters."
"Therefore each consultant who holds an interest in an energy company must
divest himself or herself of that interest by noon today. If he or she
refuses, the state will sever its contract with that person."
However, the governor's office has taken a distinctly different stance with
his closest financial advisors, Fichera and Hoffman.
Davis aides cite an opinion sought last week from attorney Raquelle de la
Rocha, a former member of the Los Angeles Ethics Commission and the state
Fair Political Practices Commission. She concluded that the advisors do not
have to file disclosure statements because they are contractors, not
consultants, and will be working for less than a year on a limited range of
projects.
Fichera is Davis' point man on the governor's energy rescue plan--including
the unprecedented bond sale. He has pitched the plan to lawmakers, reporters
and the Wall Street financial community. Fichera refused to comment on the
record.
Fichera and Hoffman's companies, Saber Partners and Blackstone Group,
prepared a controversial analysis that helped underpin legislative approval
of the bond measure, intended to pay for past and future power buying.
Pact Specifies Financial Advice
The state's contract with the Fichera and Hoffman firms calls for them to
provide "financial advisory services" to the state.
The decision not to require public disclosure of their financial holdings
stands in sharp contrast to the approach taken with Montague DeRose and
Associates. That consulting firm was hired on a $1.8-million contract. Like
the other two firms, it too was hired to provide "financial advisory
services" to the state.
That firm's top advisor, Douglas S. Montague, was required by the
administration to fill out a disclosure statement. He reported no power
company interests.
The governor's legal advisors said the difference is that Montague is on a
longer contract.

PHOTO: Barry Goode, above, governor's legal affairs secretary.;

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Everyone -

Below is a update on the testing schedule for NetCo

The integration test plan for NetCo is scheduled for Thursday and/ or Friday.  However, there are numerous dependencies that are underway and must occur before the testing can start.
Namely,
    1) Infrastructure setup
    2) Global data setup (below)
    3) New CORP login test id's for NetCo (ie NC_T_xxxx) with respective drive mappings (see attached list for which ones were requested; if additional is needed, please advise).
    4) Application unit testing complete

What differences are expected in the NetCo test?  To execute the same test scenarios with the addition of:
    1) Deal Entry - Execution of deal entry scripts from EOL
    2) Back office - Transmission of Unify to SAP.  This is to test SAP's new controlling area setup for NetCo.
    3) LAN test Login id's setup for NetCo.  To test start menu population, application list, security rights.

Revision of test scripts
The test scripts will be revised to use a new book for NetCo that were recently setup (appx 150).
Andrea Dahlke will revise for Power, and (Errol McLaughlin ?) for Gas.
    The current scripts are located in O:\_Dropbox\IntegrationTestScripts.
If you are aware of any additional changes, please email myself and Terry Sanvido.

Global Data progress report - following is the data that was copied over from Estate

Global Counterparty

Completed
1) Internal Entity Records
    717 (Enron Corp) - For HQ addresses
    1305 (Enron North America) - to be renamed
    11266 (Enron Canada Corp) - to be renamed
2) Gas and Power books and portfolios set up for NetCo only
3) External counterparties - List provided by Credit group (about 950 records)
4) Addresses - Only HQ addresses

To be completed
1) More counterparties (list to be provided by Credit group)
2) Trading address roles and traders
3) Confirmation address roles and addresses
4) Documentation address roles (only physical confirms) and addresses
5) Notice address roles (for power only) and addresses

Global Contracts
To be completed
Only templates

Global Facilities
Completed
All facilities and power locations except EES facilities

Global Common Codes
Completed
All records

We hope to have the data migration completed by Wednesday.  Additional global data concerns, please contact Bill Hare or Sundar Chitradurga.


Kevin

I agree.  If we ultimately trade out of Toronto, the P/L responsibility will
probably role into you.  It looks like we were trying to close Garret Tripp
(Associate) to move to Toronto and start looking at this stuff.  If he is
going, you should meet with him before he goes.


philography (fi-LOG-ruh-fee) noun

   The practice of collecting autographs.

[From Greek philo-, loving + -graphy, writing.]

   "Virtually anything to which ink will stick can be collected, swapped or
   sold, according to the Universal Autograph Collectors Club, a 2,000-member
   association of experts in the field of philography."
   Ben Steelman, While You're Standing in Line, The Wilmington Morning
   Star (NC), Oct 22, 1998.

This week's theme: uncommon words with common suffixes.

............................................................................
Reading makes a full man, meditation a profound man, discourse a clear man.
-Benjamin Franklin

Ralph Waldo Emerson once said, "Language is a city to the building of which
every human being brought a stone." Invite your friends and family to join
in the quest by sending a gift subscription of A.Word.A.Day. It is free!
http://wordsmith.org/awad/gift.html

Pronunciation:
http://wordsmith.org/words/philography.wav
http://wordsmith.org/words/philography.ram


Attached is our Confidentiality Agreement.  Please feel free to call me at
(713) 853-6544 if you have any questions.  Thank you.


you bot 475 at 11.75


survey.enron.com

Today is your last chance to fill out the survey.

We want to thank each of you for taking time to complete The Pulse, our
annual employee feedback survey.  We have had great participation to-date )
more than 61 percent of our employees have filled it out.  For those of you
who have not yet had an opportunity, please take 10 to 15 minutes today to
"check your pulse."  Let's finish strong.


Attached are Media Clips regarding the Blockbuster announcement.

Print Media:

Full Text from the following publications:

 The Wall Street Journal
 The Washington Post
 The Los Angeles Times
 The Globe and Mail
 The Houston Chronicle
 USA Today
 Wall Street Journal Europe
 Daily Variety

Forrester Research:

Online Media:

Inside.com
http://www.inside.com/story/Story_Cached/0,2770,6999_13,00.html

MSNBC
http://www.msnbc.com/news/435408.asp#BODY

CNET
http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-2299220.html?tag=st.ne.1430735..ni

ZDNet
http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/newsbursts/0,7407,2605674,00.html?chkpt=p1bn

Forbes.com
http://www.forbes.com/tool/html/00/Jul/0720/mu4.htm

Hoover's Online
http://www.hoovers.com/news/detail/0,2417,11_2725,00.html

WSJ.com (Wall Street Journal Online Edition)
Same text as print edition


The report named: East P/L Totals <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=1&report_name=East+P/L+Totals&category_cd=1&category_name=EAST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=1&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=12/14/2001>, published as of 12/14/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


thanks

Brent A Price
11/09/2000 05:42 PM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Fundamental Operating Standards

Mike wanted to go over the DASH process with me before anything gets sent
out.  I am meeting with him tomorrow and will distribute it tomorrow or
Monday.

To: Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Fundamental Operating Standards

This is helpful.  Can you also distribute the DASH system, why we use it, how
to use it, and approvals needed for deals?  Thanks.   Jeff

Brent A Price
11/09/2000 03:39 PM
To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, John L
Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Tawney/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jere C Overdyke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric
Gonzales/LON/ECT@ECT, Rick Bergsieker/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Daniel Reck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry Lawyer/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott
Earnest/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Sweeney/HOU/ECT@ECT, D Todd Hall/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Groves/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Fundamental Operating Standards

Attached for your review are the fundamental operating standards and controls
that have been developed by the Wholesale Services group.  These standards
are to be met by all Enron offices and by each functional group within the
operations process.  Qualitative standards should be viewed as the basic
measures to be taken when opening a new office or trading a new commodity.
Statistics measuring compliance with quantitative standards will be monitored
on a daily basis and any issues that arise will be addressed immediately.

As business unit heads, you play a critical role in working with Operations
to ensure that proper controls are in place and working effectively.  Please
review this document and let me know if you have any questions or wish to
discuss further.

Regards,

Brent


Was this the longest year of your life or what??

Pete


Start Date: 4/20/01; HourAhead hour: 20;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042020.txt


Drew is available Monday after 10:00 except for 2 to 3.
He is available all day Tuesday and on Wednesday from 1 to 2.

Martha for Drew

Jan Cobden
03/03/2000 11:15 AM
To: Bill Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven
Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michel Nelson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Louis Soldano/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Conference call

Lou  Soldano would like to set up a conference call next week preferably
Monday, Tuesday or early Wednesday to discuss PG&E.

Please notify me of your availability.  Thank you.

Jan Cobden for
Lou Soldano


Errol,
Here you go.  It will need to be signed by Jeff and Sally Beck, then returned
to me.
If you have any questions, let me know.
Thanks,
Brian


This deal is gas ENA sold to CES for Energy Express.  The daily volume was
10,322 dth (a total of 309,660 for the month).  The price is CGAS IF + $.0175
+ Variable + $.02 demand for ENA transport

I just changed the price in Sitara.  My calculation shows a price of $4.6738.

Jeff, I apologize for this if you have sent out the invoice already.  Please
correct the invoice for this deal and let me know when you send it out.

Thanks.