----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 11/01/2000 05:55 PM -----

	Joe Hartsoe
	11/01/2000 05:49 PM

		 To: skean@enron.com, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@Enron, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, mpalmer@enron.com, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron,
Bernadette Hawkins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@Enron, Mona L
Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan
Comnes/PDX/ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT, Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron, Cynthia
Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Kathryn
Corbally/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON,
susan.j.mara@enron.com
		 cc: dbva@radix.net
		 Subject:

Folks  -- Attached is a summary of the Commission's Order on California.
Constitutional Crisis here we come.  Later JOE


Stan,
     Eric Thode's comment reported by Dow Jones yesterday that "most of Enron's critical employees are under contract" is not sitting well with my people--particularly Mary Kay, Rob and Steve.  He also made a comment that bonuses were "scheduled to be paid in mid-February" (a statement on a delicate subject that did not need to be made).  I know that some of this stuff can't be avoided, but I don't think we're even being careful about what is, or is not, said in the media.  I want a fair shot to deliver a solid company with good morale and a high self-esteem to Dynegy.  And mistakes like this don't help morale or the group's cohesiveness. Could you raise the concern at you 11:00 meeting if possible?

Dan


Hi Louise,

I asked each of my directs to consider 3 levels of cuts.  I told them this is strictly an exercise at this point and that we haven't been given targets (trying to keep the emotion down).  The three levels were:

 A. Remove capability for new projects but retain a reasonable ability to continue growth of our current application suite.

 B. Reduce to minimal development capability.  Retain ability for operations and minor enhancements to applications.

 C. Cut to life-support level.  Retain ability to operate the applications and fix bugs.

The cut levels are as follows:
A. Reduce by 11 (to 129)
B. Reduce by 21 (to 108)
C. Reduce by 17 (to 91)

Jeff Johnson placed himself in the A cuts, though I removed him from that cut thinking I can talk him out of it.  He is in the B cut.

Steve Stock placed himself in the B cuts.

Michael Guadarrama placed himself in the B cuts.  He said he would probably leave if the A cuts were made but would wait until we got through the transition.

Hopefully we can hold this together.

I'll try to call you to discuss.

Thanks.
--jay

Jay Webb


---------------------- Forwarded by Rob G Gay/NA/Enron on 12/08/2000 02:40 PM
---------------------------

Brian Swinford
11/27/2000 09:42 PM
To: Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: BRS Accomplishments - 2000

Rob, listed below are my key accomplishments for 2000:

1) TGS:

-Key member of TGS Finance Committee; attended quarterly meetings,
participated in major financing decisions and made recommendations to TGS
and/or ESA management.

-During 2000, assisted TGS finance staff in refinancing $300MM of
non-recourse debt in two separate transactions;  a 3 year $150MM bank FRN,
and a 3 year $150MM Eurobond issue.  Role included helping evaluate lead
arranger proposals and term sheets, selecting lead arrangers and participants
and participating in road shows representing Enron sponsorship.  Successfully
raised $300MM during a very challenging time in Argentina as well as a very
difficult time for the U.S. capital markets (i.e., Eurobond completed
immediately following the largest single drop in history of the NASDAQ).

2) TRANSREDES:

a) $10MM Liquidity Facility:  Lead approval and documentation effort for
$10MM Enron-provided credit facility to provide liquidity for oil spill clean
up expenditures and  Cuiaba construction cash calls.  Prepared DASH, managed
approval process wtih RAC and TRSA management, and lead documentation to
closure.  Loan was successfully repaid with proceeds from the Cuiaba buy-out
transaction.  Credit facility allowed TRSA to avoid a severe liquidity crisis
which could have stopped the clean up process and put its concession from the
Bolivian government at risk.

b) Buy-out of TRSA's interests in the Cuiaba Project:  Selected for lead role
in Enron's buy out of 50% of TRSA's interest in the Cuiaba Project for $40MM
(Enron's share).  Prepared DASH and ESA risk committee and Enron Corp. board
presentations, worked with RAC to obtain approval for transaction and
coordinated legal documentation process with counsel (internal and external)
and partners (Shell as co-buyer, TRSA as seller).

Buy-out transaction restored much needed liquidity to TRSA's balance sheet
and permitted Enron and Shell to move ahead on the Cuiaba financing without
having to guarantee TRSA's pro-rata share of contingent sponsor support
required by the Cuiaba lenders.  Restored liquidity to TRSA will permit it to
meet its working capital needs until May 2001 when its new tariffs become
effective (post Transition period).

c) Cuiaba Contingent Sponsor Support: In coordination with TRSA/Cuiaba
buy-out effort, assisted Cuiaba team in obtaining approval of contingent
sponsor support for OPIC/KfW financing.  Prepared DASH and worked with RAC to
obtain internal approval and assisted in preparing ESA risk committee and
Enron Corp. board presentations.  Contingent support package along with
buy-out transaction was approved by Enron's board.

c) Financial Advisory Assignment:

Selected by TRSA and ESA management to work with TRSA in a financial advisory
capacity, to advise and assist in the arrangement of up to $700MM in new
third party debt over the next 4 years to finance TRSA capital expansion
program.  In exchange for such services ESA began receiving a $12,500/month
retainer fee (October 2000 - May 2001 = $100,000 of fee income) plus the
reimbursement of all out-of-pocket expenses.

Roadshow with U.S. Exim, Bolivian pension funds, local banks and
international banks with local presence and CAF now completed.  Assisting
TRSA management with resolution of Supreme Decree and Tariff Reset and
existing debt seniority issue.

GTB:

a) Financial Advisory Assignment:  Selected by GTB and ESA management to work
with GTB in a financial advisory capacity, to advise and assist in the
arrangement of up to $210MM in new third party debt over the next 4 years to
finance GTB's capital expansion program.  In exchange for such services, ESA
began receiving a $12,500/month retainer fee (October 2000 - May 2001 =
$100,000 of fee income) plus the reimbursement of all out-of-pocket
expenses.

Roadshow with U.S. Exim, Bolivian pension funds, local banks and
international banks with local presence and CAF now completed.  Letter of
Interest obtained from U.S. Exim.  Working with GTB management to finalize
credit rating process and clean up commercial contracts for financing.

TRAINING:  Completed Executive Impact training course (requirement for 2000).

In the event you did not receive the amount of manager/peer feedback that you
would like to see to prepare my review, I do have the feedback booklet that I
got recently from the Executive Impact course that you could use.  I have it
in my office...I can have Blanca get it for you if you want to see it.

Thanks for your support.

BRS


Here is the attachment.  Sorry.

John

The Johnco Group, LLC
3629 Lake Kristin Drive
Gretna, LA 70056

Phone  (504) 392-7557
Cell      (504) 491-2784
Fax      (208) 730-4713

 - accrualspreadsheetJAC.xls


550042
buy reliant
sp15
185.00
trader - Bill Williams

549077
buy williams
sp15
107.00
traded yesterday

550271 - changed to SP15

550370/371 - already in as april

All jeff richter trades should have correct total MW now.

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
03/14/2001 01:37 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: apb checkout

missing deals for jeff

buy reliant
15th
sp15
25 mw
185.00
on peak

buy williams
april
25 mw
107.00
sp15
off peak

550271  broker has SP15 (jeff r)

550370
550371  broker has april on both of these trades (mike s)

here are jeffs deals w/apb that i know are wrong and there could be more w/
other brokers

550261
550266
550270
550271
550276


I believe you will still have to allocate.  We probably will still have FS reporting requirements; therefore, you will have to ensure the various segments will have their ENW costs.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Roper, Kerry
Sent:	Monday, December 31, 2001 11:16 AM
To:	Colwell, Wes
Cc:	Beck, Sally; Galvan, Michael S.
Subject:	ENW Costs

Wes,
Based on your comments last month, we are not planning on assessing any ENW allocations to other business units (except for regulated companies).  Please let me know if this assumption is not correct.

Kerry (x5-4895)


This message is for all ABRA users:

Due to the IT conversion, ABRA will be unavailable Friday, July 12th through
Sunday, July 14th.

ABRA will be back up and available Monday, July 15th.

We appreciate your understanding during this transitional phase.


Charlie,

I will give you a call tomorrow A.M.  I just got back from Boston, so I
didn't get your e-mail until now.

JM

-----Original Message-----
From: V.Charles.Weldon@enron.com [mailto:V.Charles.Weldon@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, November 27, 2000 7:42 AM
To: Jonathan Mueller
Subject: Misc

Jonathan,

Hope you had a good Thanksgiving weekend.  I'd like to catch up with you
today if possible regarding recruiting etc.  Can I reach you by phone.
If
so, where?
You can call me toll free at 1-800-97-ENRON and follow the menu.   My
extension is X57229 or you can use the voice activated system.

Thanks,

Charlie


I heard that you asked for this in staff meeting this morning.

2002 Corporate aviation hours budgeted for:

Stan  120 hours $510,000
NNG    50 hours  $200,000


Hi Gloria,

Could you please print these for me?  Thanks,  Kay

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 08/28/2000 04:11
PM ---------------------------

"David Parr" <dparr@bracepatt.com> on 08/28/2000 01:12:54 PM
To: <heather.kroll@enron.com>, <kay.mann@enron.com>, <ozzie.pagan@enron.com>
cc: "Nancy Wodka" <nwodka@bracepatt.com>

Subject: Enron/VEPCO

Attached please find the latest version o fthe VEPCO agreement.  I have also
attached a version that has been processed through CompareRite against Kay's
August 15th version.

Feel free to call Nancy with questions and comments on 202-828-5862.

D. David Parr, Jr., Esq.
Bracewell & Patterson, L.L.P.
2000 K Street NW, Suite 500
Washington, D.C.  20006-1872
202-828-5800 Telephone
202-857-2122 Facsimile

 - CLEAN VEPCO PPA.doc
 - COMPARERITE VEPCO PPA.rtf


Michelle,

Lee Allbritton and I are friends.   He suggested I contact you regarding the employment position you are  seeking to fill.  He explained that you are not using recruiters to  fill this slot.

I understand you have already seen several  candidates but I would appreciate the opportunity to meet you and  discuss the position.  My resume is attached for your consideration.   My firm is unaware that I am seeking other employment so I would respectfully  request that you keep my interest in Enron confidential.

I look forward to hearing from you.   Thank you for your time.

Ellen Malow
713-668-4790emalow@earthlink.net
 - resume.doc


This letter is good , just get Sharon to give me a copy to sign.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Crawford, Sharon   On Behalf Of Keohane, Peter
Sent:	Wednesday, September 12, 2001 11:57 AM
To:	Zufferli, John
Subject:	Letter to Power Pool

Attached is draft letter to Power Pool:

 << File: Ltr.Power Pool re Sundance 3 and 4 dispatch.doc >>


Here's the load mix for Southern and TVA, for the region and top 5, in case you haven't gotten that far yet.  Don't understand why TVA (the utility) has no res/com load, but that's what PowerDat had.  Enjoy.

E


30 days is acceptable.  This is extremely important to us.

Susan Ralph@EOTT
04/27/2001 02:17 PM
To: Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Dana Gibbs/Houston/Eott@Eott, Lawrence
Clayton/Houston/Eott@Eott
cc: Louis Soldano/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: environmental insurance for EOTT

You asked for a time line on securing this quote.

I have already discussed the general concept with Marsh Mac and a bit of
strategy on how we would approach this with AIG.

Lou,  I need you to give me the data that we have available on these lines.
As I mentioned to you, I want to go to the carrier  with what I have to offer
them instead of them dictating to me what they want.   Until I get this I am
strictly talking in a vacuum and can get nothing moving forward.

After that, I would think that I could have a quote from them within 30
days..I will shoot for better than that.  I feel however that this quote/due
diligence will be much more intensive on their part  given their experience
with EOTT,  I can definitely ask for an answer within a specified time
frame.  Is 30 days acceptable?

 Hope this answers your questions.  If not please let me know.


once again, Bob, you proved that you are my hero
thanx
Nathalie
Bomar
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Novotny" <bobnovotny@juno.com>
To: <emca@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 5:44 PM
Subject: Re: *EMCA* Graffiti spotting

> Well Kids i'm back.
> It seems that a sub-contractor had an illegal city of Houston sign placed
> on the job site and did't get a permit to cut up new pavement. So as it
> stands the subcontractor will  have to pave the entire block. Watch the
> 10pm chan.  11 news.
> One e-mail and all this. Stay active folks.
> Bob
> On Fri, 19 Oct 2001 11:35:17 -0500 "Amy & Alistair"
> <barnesfamilyus@prodigy.net> writes:
> >------=_NextPart_000_005C_01C15892.20AF1860
> >Content-Type: text/plain;
> > charset="iso-8859-1"
> >Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> >
> >Larry (Anti Graffiti Task Force Leader),
> >
> >Graffiti sighting on Whitney, between West Drew and Welch (closer to
> >Welch)=
> > on a large utilities box - can't miss it
> >
> >Get 'em!!!!!!!!!
> >
> >Amy B
> >
> >
> >------=_NextPart_000_005C_01C15892.20AF1860
> >Content-Type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII
> >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> >
> ><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
> >
> ><META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
> ><META content="MSHTML 5.00.2614.3500" name=GENERATOR>
> >
> >
> >
> >
Larry (Anti Graffiti Task Force
> >Leader),

> >

> >
Graffiti sighting on Whitney, between
> >West Drew
> >and Welch (closer to Welch) on a large utilities box - can't miss
> >it

> >

> >
Get 'em!!!!!!!!!

> >

> >
Amy B

> >

> >

> >
> >
> >
> >

> >

> >Yahoo! Groups
> >Sponsor
> >

> >

> >
 >cellspacing=0>
 >size=-2>ADVERTISEMENT

>href="http://rd.yahoo.com/M=194081.1637497.3177299.1261774/D=egroupweb/S=17
05044493:HM/A=766942/R=0/*http://www.ediets.com/start.cfm?code=3225"targe
> >t=_top>
>src="http://us.a1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/a/ed/ediets/1119_300x250_07.gif"alt=
"Click
>
> >Here!" width="300" height="250" border="0">

> >

> >

>src="http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=194081.1637497.3177299.1261774/D=egro
upmail/S=1705044493:HM/A=766942/rand=777465502">

> >

> >
> >
> >
> >
> >

> ><tt>
> >To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

> >emca-unsubscribe@egroups.com

> >

> ></tt>
> >

> >
> >

> ><tt>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the  >href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/">Yahoo! Terms of
> >Service.</tt>
> >

> >
> >
> >
> >------=_NextPart_000_005C_01C15892.20AF1860--
> >
>
> ________________________________________________________________
> GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
> Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
> Join Juno today!  For your FREE software, visit:
> http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> emca-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Get your FREE credit report with a FREE CreditCheck
Monitoring Service trial
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Gi0tnD/bQ8CAA/ySSFAA/NoOolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
emca-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


IntercontinentalExchange
                                                                                Firm Power Price Bulletin
                                                                                For Power Delivered on Friday, December  07, 2001
                                                                                (Trade Date of Thursday, December  06, 2001)
Click here to access index history


Sure.

Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
cameron@perfect.com
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)

-----Original Message-----
From:  Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 12:25 PM
To: Cameron Sellers
Subject: RE:

You going to brief me tonite on tomorrow's meeting?


Funny article
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Weisenmiller [mailto:rbw@mrwassoc.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 7:20 PM
To: Comnes, Alan
Subject: Fwd:

<x-flowed>

</x-flowed>


Per our conversation.


Jeff--so what is a state librarian?  Must be a west coast kind of specialty!!

With regard to Glen Thomas, I believe that he is the newly appointed chair who was previously Governor Tom Ridge's policy guy in the governor's office. I think he is pretty young (early thirties) and that he still has strong ties in that office and should be vocal on markets working and political leadership (the right kind!) being neccesary.  Steffes might be able to give you more insight, but if my recollection is right, he wasn't involved in the early PECO fights--I think he came on the scene a little later.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Thursday, September 27, 2001 7:12 PM
To:	Kean, Steven J.; Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.; Robertson, Linda; Landwehr, Susan M.; Denne, Karen; Mara, Susan; Kaufman, Paul; Nord, Sue; Palmer, Mark A. (PR); Guerrero, Janel
Subject:	Participation in Roundtable on Lessons Learned in California on October 4th

On October 4th, I'll be trying to fill Rob Bradley's rather large shoes at the Cal State University Center for California Studies' 13th annual envisioning California conference, "Our Year of Disconnect:  The Politics of Power in California."

I'll be participating in a Roundtable at the plenary session entitled: "Lessons Learned, Unlearned & To Be Learned:  A Roundtable on California's Utility Deregulation."

The Roundtable will be moderated by the State Librarian, Kevin Starr.  The other roundtable-ists include:

Chuck Cicchetti (Edison plant?  Anyone know what he's up to these days?)
Bob Foster--Edison
Nettie Hoge--head of TURN
Glen Thomas--Chair of the Pennsylvania PUC (any info on Chair Thomas is appreciated)
State Senator Debra Bowen
David Freeman--Self-appointed emporer
Dr. Joseph Pratt--History prof., University of Houston (any info on the professor is also appreciated)

Each of us will have two minutes to open and then Dr. Starr will moderate the ensuing mud-slinging.

Attached are some draft talking points that I threw together for your review.  All comments, suggestions, guffaws, etc. are welcome and appreciated.

Best,
Jeff

 << File: CSU Rountable draft talking points 0927.doc >>


Yea ... the later the better.

Brian Hoskins@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
10/05/2000 03:18 PM
To: Fangming.Zhu@enron.com
cc: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Demo

Fangming,

I am out of town until tomorrow so will not be able to see the demo today.
Wednesday afternoon looks good for me if you'd like to do it then.  John,
does this work for you?

Brian

Brian T. Hoskins
Enron Broadband Services
713-853-0380 (office)
713-412-3667 (mobile)
713-646-5745 (fax)
Brian_Hoskins@enron.net

	Fangming.Zhu@enron.com
	10/05/00 09:17 AM

		 To: Brian Hoskins/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc: Allen.Elliott@enron.com
		 Subject: Demo

Hi, Brian:
Let me know if you have time for the messageboard application demo today. I
am planning to take vacation on Friday and coming Monday. I will not be
available to show you the demo until next Wednesday if you can't see it
today.

Let me know your schedule.

Thanks,

Fangming


Mike:

We'd talked about getting together to discuss the bills for the case.  We'd
originally agreed to a flat fee of $13, 500 (if memory serves) with a bonus
for coming in under the cap.  You've sent me bills (as of August 17 according
to my records) for over $25,000.  As you recall, we had a very lengthy
discussion regarding the magnitude of the work associated with the hearings
and associated briefs.  I stressed that $13.5 was what I'd spend and that
we'd have to do the best we could within that constraint, which is why I
pressed for a flat fee arrangement at the outset.  With that in mind, I
believe that it's important to honor the arrangement.  However, in light of
the particular circumstances in this case, I'm willing to exceed the previous
arrangement for a total of $15,000, but can't go above that.  If you'd like
to discuss it further, I'd be happy to talk about it.  Let me know.

Best,
Jeff


we are going to go out tomorrow night.  if you guys want to meet us for
drinks and then go out.  email me back and give me your number & i will call
you tomorrow.


Copy of forthcoming article on assessing and managing risks relating to
collateral.

Call or write if questions or comments.

Charles
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com

 - 16-20OPR.pdf


Hey,

I just found the curtailment on our trade sheets.  We didn't have anything directly with Burbank on a preshedule.  I'm having Donald look at the tags to see if they end up sinking with them.  I also notice that the original curtailment is thru HE 1200.  We redirected the length in the NW to PWX.  We also only had 1 obligation, which was to LDWP.  That was re-directed to Malin.  Hope this helps.

diana

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Thompson, Virginia
Sent:	Friday, September 21, 2001 11:21 AM
To:	Scholtes, Diana
Subject:	Outage for August 2001

Diana-

  We just got a call from Steve at PGE regarding the following:

  There was a scheduled outage on the DC tie on August 4, 2001 that was supposed to run thru HE 12, but that outage actually lasted until HE 16.
  PGE is saying that we sank at Burbank but that Burbank doesn't want to pay PGE.
  I'm not sure what this means or how this is our problem, but if you know anything about it, please let me know.
  If you want Steve's extention, it's x7410.

  Thanks,

  Virginia


Just a thought - but we will still be finishing up bid week on Nov. 29.  Any
ideas about the first week in December.

Jeanie Slone
11/02/2000 03:56 PM
To: Fred Lagrasta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas A Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Final Gas and Power Trading PRC meeting

Mark you calendars for the Gas and Power Trading PRC meetings to be held
Wed. November 29 (Commercial) and Mon. December 4(Commercial Support)  You
will receive specific information regarding times and locations soon.
If you would like additional members of your staff to attend the meeting to
provide feedback, please submit their names to me by November 10.
A formal Gas pre-ranking meeting is not scheduled.  However, if you are
interested in conducting a pre-PRC meeting, please contact me by November 10.

Best regards,
Jeanie
X5-3847


Please respond to nytdirect
Wednesday, April 18, 2001
------------------------------------------------------------

A Classic Is Reborn

1. Main Course: Remembrance of Madeleines Past
2. Recipe of the Week: Fish Paillard with Ginger, Garlic and
Tomatoes
3. Wine List: Diners Discover Life After Chardonnay
4. Multimedia: A Video Visit to Le Zinc
5. NYC Restaurants: Chanterelle Gets a More Casual Sibling
6. Reader Discussion: The Best Banana Bread

/----------------------Advertisement-----------------------\

Sign up for Stuart Elliott's IN ADVERTISING newsletter.

Now Stuart Elliott brings his expertise to IN ADVERTISING, a
weekly e-mail newsletter from NYTimes.com that takes a close
look at the people, campaigns and deals that are shaping the
industry. This must-read newsletter features a campaign
spotlight, WEBDENDA, and a roundup of the previous week's
advertising columns. Sign up now!

http://email.nytimes.com/email/email.jsp?0418wd
\----------------------------------------------------------/

1. Main Course: Remembrance of Madeleines Past
==============================================

A classic that is forever being reborn: The madeleine,
favorite of Marcel Proust and fellow dessert lovers
everywhere, is back again, as the formal end to expensive
meals at just about every important restaurant in New York.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/04/18/living/18SHEL.html?0418wd

A Celebrity Chef Resurfaces

Jeremiah Tower, the chef who helped define California
cuisine at two of the most influential American restaurants
of the 1970's and 80's, Berkeley's Chef Panisse and San
Fransisco's Stars, visits New York and goes on the record
about his illustrious past.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/04/18/living/18TOWE.html?0418wd

2. Recipe of the Week: Fish Paillard with Ginger, Garlic and
Tomatoes
========================================================

Jeremiah Tower also provides us with his recipe for this
hearty fish entree.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/04/18/living/181TREX.html?0418wd

Wine Pairing:
1999 Domaine Weinbach Riesling, Schlossberg Cuvee Ste.
Catherine 'L'Inedit' Grand Cru
http://www.winetoday.com/search97cgi/s97_cgi?Action=FilterSearch&SearchPage=result_end.html&collection=WineTodayReviewsEnd&Filter=result_end_filter.hts&ResultTemplate=result_end.hts&querytext=&wineid=18915

-----

The Minimalist: Pork and Onions with Amontillado

The secret's in the sherry, says Mark Bittman of this
delectable dish, which uses the powerful flavors of pork,
onions, fresh herbs and sherry.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/04/18/living/18MINI.html?0418wd

3. Wine List: Diners Discover Life After Chardonnay
===================================================

Frank J. Prial suggests diners need to be more adventurous
with their wine selections at restaurants.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/04/18/living/18WINE.html?0418wd

-----

Wine Picks

Alsace, a region in France, produces some of the most
opulent, rich and luscious wines in the world. These
show-stoppers are produced from white grapes such as
Riesling and Gewurztraminer. If you're unfamiliar with these
food-friendly wines give the following bottles a try:

1998 Lucien Albrecht Gewurztraminer, Cuvee Martine Albrecht
$25.50 - An exotic and spicy dry white wine that's laced
with a touch of ginger.
4 stars
http://www.winetoday.com/search97cgi/s97_cgi?Action=FilterSearch&SearchPage=result_end.html&collection=WineTodayReviewsEnd&Filter=result_end_filter.hts&ResultTemplate=result_end.hts&querytext=&wineid=19135&SUBMIT.x=28&SUBMIT.y=9

1998 Louis Sipp Riesling Kirchberg
$19.50 - An intense, age-worthy Riesling with fabulous
structure and elegance.
4stars
http://www.winetoday.com/search97cgi/s97_cgi?Action=FilterSearch&SearchPage=result_end.html&collection=WineTodayReviewsEnd&Filter=result_end_filter.hts&ResultTemplate=result_end.hts&querytext=&wineid=18896&SUBMIT.x=28&SUBMIT.y=9

1998 Hugel Riesling Jubilee
$35 - A textbook example of crisp, lemony Riesling from
Alsace.
4 stars
http://www.winetoday.com/search97cgi/s97_cgi?Action=FilterSearch&SearchPage=result_end.html&collection=WineTodayReviewsEnd&Filter=result_end_filter.hts&ResultTemplate=result_end.hts&querytext=&wineid=18925&SUBMIT.x=28&SUBMIT.y=9

4. Multimedia: A Video Visit to Le Zinc
=======================================

Join New York Times critic William Grimes for a special
video tour of Le Zinc, the casual New York eatery from the
owners of the popular Chanterelle. Also, take tours of other
New York restaurants, including Tamarind, Olives and the
four-star Daniel.
http://www.nytimes.com/library/dining/index-video.html?0418wd

5. NYC Restaurants: Chanterelle Gets a More Casual Sibling
==========================================================

Chanterelle, the three-star restaurant that has been a
popular TriBeCa destination for over two decades, gets a
sibling as David and Karen Waltuck open Le Zinc, a
bar-restaurant that features Chef Waltuck's more casual
side.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/04/18/living/11REST.html?0418wd

-----

$25 and Under: For Those Who Run From Eat-on-the-Run Pizza

The pizza pies at Risa, a low-key spot in SoHo, taste as
good as they look.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/04/18/living/18UNDE.html?0418wd

-----

To Go: Through a Tiny Portal, Japan

The tiny Saji's Kitchen of Japan provides the Upper West
Side a variety of Japanese specialties, including donburi,
fried foods served with eggs over rice.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/04/18/living/18TOGO.html?0418wd

Find a Restaurant
http://nytoday.com/RestaurantAdvanced.html

-----

Bar of the Week: The Roxy

Another bar has opened on Smith Street in Brooklyn, making a
total of seven on or near the street, which in 1999 had one.
Luckily, the Roxy has its own style.
http://nytoday.com/search/bin/bar?st=bar&bid=987013036138

Find a Bar
http://www.nytoday.com/search/bin/bar?st=cat_nei&cat=NYToday%20Pick&nei=Manhattan

6. Reader Discussion: The Best Banana Bread
===========================================

From a recipe for banana bread to organic wine
recommendations, readers share their insights and answer
fellow readers' questions.

Q. Where can I find a recipe for the world's best banana
bread? I want to redeem myself after a low-fat recipe I
tried last week that turned out rubbery and flavorless. --
veronica

Read the responses to this question and many others:
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/04/17/living/17KNOW.html?0418wd

I hope you've enjoyed this email. Bon appetit!

Dan Saltzstein
Producer, Dining
New York Times Digital
daniel@nytimes.com

------------------------------------------------------------
HOW TO CHANGE YOUR SUBSCRIPTION
------------------------------------------------------------
You received this message because you signed up for the New
York Times Wine & Dine Newsletter. To cancel delivery,
change delivery options, change your e-mail address or sign
up for other newsletters, see http://www.nytimes.com/email

HOW TO ADVERTISE
------------------------------------------------------------
For information on advertising in e-mail newsletters or
other creative advertising opportunities with The New York
Times on the Web, please contact Alyson Racer at
alyson@nytimes.com or visit our online media kit at
http://www.nytimes.com/adinfo


Well, looks like we are not the only ones that have problems every now and
then!!!  I received a similar message this morning stating that the site was
down.

Sheri
---------------------- Forwarded by Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT on 02/07/2001 01:30
PM ---------------------------

Customer.Care@dynegy.com on 02/07/2001 01:29:56 PM
To:
cc:
Subject: Dynegydirect System Update

(Embedded image moved to file: pic19718.gif)
Dear Dynegydirect User,

As of 2:00PM CT today, February, 7, 2001, the Dynegydirect application will
be unavailable.  Trading will resume tomorrow, February 8, 2001, during
regularly scheduled hours.
If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact an
e-Care analyst at the number listed below.   We apologize for any
inconvenience this may have caused.

Thank you,

DYNEGYdirect e- care
Customer Support
Dynegy, Inc.
Ph: (877) 396.3493   Fx: (877) 396.3492
Email: ecare@dynegydirect.com
 - pic19718.gif


hard to offend me

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Notestine, Kerry" <KNotestine@littler.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Notestine+2C+20Kerry+22+20+3CKNotestine+40littler+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, August 23, 2001 2:06 PM
To:	Cash, Michelle
Subject:	RE: Serious Health Condition based on Certification from a Nutrit ioni st

Sometimes you never know.  Sorry if I overreated.

Kerry E Notestine
Littler Mendelson, PC
1900 Chevron Tower
1301 McKinney Street
Houston, Texas 77010
713.652.4748
713.951.9212 (fax)
knotestine@littler.com
www.littler.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Michelle.Cash@enron.com [mailto:Michelle.Cash@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 2:07 PM
To: KNotestine@littler.com
Subject: RE: Serious Health Condition based on Certification from a
Nutrit ioni st

Of course -- I was just giving you grief!

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "Notestine, Kerry" <KNotestine@littler.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Notestine+2C+20Kerry+22+20+3CKNotestine+40littler+2Eco
m+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]

   Sent:   Thursday, August 23, 2001 11:42 AM
   To:     Cash, Michelle
   Subject:  RE: Serious Health Condition based on Certification from a
             Nutrit ioni st

   I wouldn't put it exactly that way but ...  Sometimes you need to let
   them
   know that if they give a good response, the client can be billed a
   quarter
   hour.  Otherwise, we may not get a response.  I also do not want to bill
   for
   cursory or not well reasoned statements.

   Kerry E Notestine
   Littler Mendelson, PC
   1900 Chevron Tower
   1301 McKinney Street
   Houston, Texas 77010
   713.652.4748
   713.951.9212 (fax)
   knotestine@littler.com
   www.littler.com

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Michelle.Cash@enron.com [mailto:Michelle.Cash@enron.com]
   Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 11:35 AM
   To: KNotestine@littler.com
   Subject: RE: Serious Health Condition based on Certification from a
   Nutritioni st

   So, my question goes to the highest bidder . . .

       -----Original Message-----
      From:   "Notestine, Kerry" <KNotestine@littler.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Notestine+2C+20Kerry+22+20+3CKNotestine+40littler+2Eco
   m+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]

      Sent:   Thursday, August 23, 2001 9:25 AM
      To:     #All Attorneys Firmwide
      Cc:     Cash, Michelle
      Subject:  Serious Health Condition based on Certification from a
                Nutritioni st

      Client received an FMLA leave request based on a Certified
      Nutritionist's
      completion of the serious health condition form.  This does not
   appear
      to be
      a person authorized by the regs to certify a person as having a
   serious
      health condition.  Any thoughts on how to respond to this leave
   request.
      Billable credit for the most helpful response(s).

      Kerry E Notestine
      Littler Mendelson, PC
      1900 Chevron Tower
      1301 McKinney Street
      Houston, Texas 77010
      713.652.4748
      713.951.9212 (fax)
      knotestine@littler.com
      www.littler.com

      ----
      This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the
   sole
      use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or
      disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
   intended
      recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please
   contact
      the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message.

      To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
      postmaster@littler.com

      Littler Mendelson, P.C.
      http://www.littler.com

   **********************************************************************
   This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
   and
   may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
   intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
   others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
   authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
   reply
   to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
   all
   copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
   intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence
   a
   binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
   affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
   be
   relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
   Thank you.
   **********************************************************************

   ----
   This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole
   use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or
   disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
   recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact
   the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message.

   To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
   postmaster@littler.com

   Littler Mendelson, P.C.
   http://www.littler.com

----
This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@littler.com

Littler Mendelson, P.C.
http://www.littler.com


Chonawee,

As I have pointed out, short-selling the stock may be a bad
decision because of tax implications (ignoring the legal aspects).

Suppose the strike is $70 and you were granted an ATM option.
You  sell short at $70 ten lots (one lot  = 100 shares). The price goes to
$100.
You lose $30 x 1000 = $30,000 on your short position. Option exercise
gives you $30,000. This is before taxes. You pay taxes
on your option income (it's treated as ordinary income). The tax is
28% x $30,000 = $8,400. You can use only $3,000 of your loss against
ordinary income. This saves you only $840 in taxes.

Of course, if you have capital gains, you can use losses on your option
position
as an offset.

The remaining part of your capital loss  is carried forward and you get the
tax benefits over time (less the time value of money), assuming you have
income in the
future (or capital gains).

Not so good.

By the way, valuation and optimal exercise of employee stock options
is a very interesting and difficult problem.

Vince

Chonawee Supatgiat@ENRON
07/10/2000 11:40 AM
To: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: short-sell vs exercise

Below is my writing that was originally planned to post somewhere. It
explains how to handle a special type of call options which can be exercised
but cannot be sold. (As we know that it is never optimal to exercise a call
option before its maturity). However, after taking Vince's comments on the
ordinary income/capital loss TAX offsetting issue, I think this is not a good
article anymore. I guess I could just throw this article away. :-)
-chonawee

Short-selling is better than exercising your employee stock options

In general, the sensible time to exercise your employee stock option is when
you speculate that ENE is going down or its growth rate is extremely low. In
fact, when exercising the options, you are speculating that ENE would never
reach this point (plus interest) again during the 10 years maturity date or
until you leave the company. If you do not anticipate that, you should hold
on to your options because you can gain higher profit by delaying your
exercise.

However, if you believe that ENE is reaching its peak. Then, instead of
exercising the options, you should short-sell (or sell) the stocks in that
amount. After short-selling, when you feel that the stock starts to go up,
you can buy them back (to cover), make profit, and still keep the options. On
the other hand, if the stock does not go down as expect, you can exercise the
options to cover your short position anytime.

Let us take a look at a simple case where there are no taxes, no dividends,
and zero risk-free rate. Suppose that ENE follows a simple sample path as
follow

If you exercise 100 ENE options with a grant price of 45 when ENE reaches 70,
you would earn  (70-45)*100 = $2,500. But if you short sell 100 ENE at 70, no
matter how much ENE is in the future, you can exercise the options to cover
the short position and still earn (70-45)*100 = $2,500. The advantage of
short-selling comes when ENE at the period 2 is 60. At this point, you can
cover your short position, get (70-60)*100 = $1,000, and still keep your
options or you can exercise the options and gain $2,500. That is, you still
keep the flexibility of your options when you short-sell. In conclusion, the
only sensible time to exercise your employee stock options is to cover your
short position.


---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 02/15/2000
05:45 PM ---------------------------

Dale Neuner on 07/30/99 01:27:33 PM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Rock - Tenn Conditional Swap

Please call me when you get this and I'll explain.


[IMAGE]Unsubscribe at bottom
[IMAGE]  [IMAGE]
[IMAGE]    [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]    Click here to download FREE Collapse demo!    [IMAGE]
 remove me                    privacy  policy       You received this e-mail because you downloaded a RealPlayer
, RealJukebox
, or another product from Real.com? and indicated a preference to receive special offers from RealNetworks
, or you subscribed to the Special Offers e-mail category in your account area. If you do not wish to receive e-mails from us in the future, click on the "remove me" link above.   RealNetworks, RealPlayer, RealJukebox, Real.com, and RealArcade are trademarks or registered trademarks of RealNetworks, Inc. All other companies or products listed herein are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners.


Jeanne,
The on and off peak prices are in the ISO document I attached earlier.

Go to page 3 and column 5 "Effective Real-time Average Price"
There is an on-peak and off-peak price there.  That should make the case that
the off-peak price is also high.

/TJ
---------------------- Forwarded by Tamara Johnson/HOU/EES on 04/17/2001
09:58 AM ---------------------------

Tamara Johnson
04/17/2001 09:38 AM
To: Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, JMB <JBennett@GMSSR.com> @ ENRON
cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert
Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: MORE backup for the $290/MWh

Harry,
The future prices used below are from NYMEX - quoted for California Oregon
Border (COB)
I am attaching the web pages that are relevant

We obtained the NP15 numbers from a daily compilation of Dow Jones NP15
quotes.  Since we don't have that on a recognizable piece of paper, I am
attaching the most recent ISO Market Activity Report for February.  That
contains a February price of $341/MWh (see page 3).

To get from $290 to (about) $300/MWh add the following
1) Ancillary services -- use about 4-5% of energy costs (see page 5 of ISO
report)
2) Losses to get from Supplier to Customer -- even 5% losses (which is
conservative) adds another $10/MWh

/TJ

---------------------- Forwarded by Tamara Johnson/HOU/EES on 04/17/2001
09:29 AM ---------------------------

Tamara Johnson
04/13/2001 05:22 PM
To: Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: backup for the $290/MWh

NP15:  Recorded hourly Dow Jones numbers averaged using the same time periods
as NYMEX.
MW:  Reported as of April 12 NYMEX.

Peak Periods = (365 days less 10 holidays) x 6/7 weekdays x 16 hours => 56%
On-peak

The current rates for PG&E and SCE are as per the Mar 27 CPUC decision.  The
GWh are from the utilities 2001 (12mos) rate design templates.


PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL

Vicki Sharp, John Klauberg and I had a short call on Sunday to discuss any
legal issues associated with the proposed accounting treatment of certain of
transactions between EPMI and EES.

1. EPMI has requested that the economics of the Assigned Transactions (the
PGET transactions assumed by EPMI and referred to in the December 28, 2000
letter between EPMI and EEMC) be held by EPMI, and not retained by EEMC as
provided by the letter agreement.

Wes, could you confirm that EPMI wishes to assume the economics of those
transactions effective 1/1/2001?  I have assumed that this is the case, and
have drafted an amendment to the December 28 letter accordingly (attached
below).  Please review and let me know if this is something we can work with
(note that the draft letter may need revisions based upon resolutions of
other issues raised in this e-mail).  We will also need to confirm that there
are no undesirable tax or bankruptcy implications to this approach.

One element of the assignment of the "Regulatory Receivable" and the
assignment to EPMI of the PGET trades that we have questions regarding is the
apparent lack of consideration flowing back to EEMC/EES as a result of these
transactions -- we will have transferred some fairly substantial assets from
EEMC/EES to EPMI, but have made no provision for those entities receiving
anything in exchange.  The December 28 letter did make reference to the
possibility of "back-to-back" transactions between EPMI and EEMC, which may
answer that questions with respect to the assignment of the PGET trades, but
if we are going to go that route, we would need to work out the terms of
those "back-to-back" transaction by which EPMI sells the power that it
purchases from PGET/Avista to EEMC to enable EEMC to fill its short position.
For instance, at what price would EPMI resell the PGET/Avista power to EEMC
so that EEMC can supply the requirements of its Direct Access Customers?  If
the transfer price is at market, EEMC will recognize a significant loss on
sales to its DACs.

2. On January 17, 2001, EES and EEMC assigned certain of their "Regulatory
Receivables" to EPMI.  The assignment was intended to be an absolute transfer
and true sale of EEMC/EES' rights in those receivables, but the Assignment
Agreement does not recite any consideration for that transfer.  Again, we
assume that the transfers of those receivables would leave a  "hole" in EES'
books that, in an arms-length transaction, would be filled by the
consideration that EES/EEMC received for the sale.  Has there been any
conversation about the benefits that may ultimately flow back to EES/EEMC in
consideration for their transfer of these receivables to EPMI?  While the
attached amendment is not intended to address the assignment of that
receivable, it may be beneficial to make reference to those benefits in this
amendment.

3. The January 17, 2001 assignment transferred that portion of the negative
CTC that had accrued to date, but we have not effected any transaction to
transfer the risk of the remaining marked position to EPMI.  There was some
discussion of an EES/EPMI "swap" that would transfer the risk in the
remaining position to EPMI.  Is that still being contemplated?

Travis McCullough
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street EB 3817
Houston Texas 77002
Phone:  (713) 853-1575
Fax: (713) 646-3490


Hi Sweetie,
?
How are you?? I got up about an hour  ago.? I went to bed pretty late last
night-probably because I slept a lot  yesterday and because I was cleaning.?
My room looks a whole lot  better.? I'll probably be cleaning for a couple of
days.? I just hope  that Bren cleans up her stuff so I don't have to.
?
I don't know when Em is supposed to be here,  she'd said she would call.?
Anyway, Ray is coming to my graduation.?  That's nice, huh?? Now it's gonna
be a total of 13 people here!? He  going to be in Austin tomorrow.? He's
going to stay here all weekend.?  I don't know where I'm going to put
everyone!
?
I have rehearsal at 7:15 tonight, so call me  before 6:45, okay?
?
I'll be checking my email all day......so say  hello!
?
Love you,
Jenn


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Aguayo, Janie
Sent:	Friday, May 04, 2001 2:01 PM
To:	Jason Williams/HOU/ECT@ENRON; Vanek, Darren
Cc:	Wallumrod, Ellen
Subject:	Pending Credit

Hi guys,

Are the following deals still pending credit?

Marquee	V56106.1	Darren Vanek
Marquee	V56106.2	Darren Vanek
Bassenprococ	V55940.1	Darren Vanek
Bassenprococ	V55940.2	Darren Vanek
Mslatxpipcom	V56670.1	Darreb Vanek
Swift		V73135.1	Jay Williams
Swift		V73135.2	Jay Williams

Thank you - Janie
(713) 571-3184


Hi Tana, did you get the money situation taken care of. Please let me know.
I do have a payroll to meet.

Thanks
Louis

 - winmail.dat


I'm not betting the farm on the escrow funding tomorrow.  I'll manage
expectations on this end.  I don't want to let up on Delta, however.

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 04/19/2001 03:48:56 PM
To: "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: ENA Agreement as to Forms of Agreements

Kay:

We need agreement on the escrow disbursement letter (which Delta still needs
to comment on).  Per the letter agreement, we already have agreement on the
form of Amended and Restated LLC Agreement; however, the outstanding issue
with respect to requiring unanimous member consent for sale of all or
substantially all of the assets of the LLC is still on the table.

Isabel Parker called and reminded me that the ENA Consent and Agreement is
to be signed tomorrow, Friday 4/20, contemporaneously with the funding of
the escrow account, rather than upon closing.  She is happy with the letter
if we drop its references to the ENA Consent and Agreement.

I am now worried about the ability to have an escrow funded by tomorrow,
given that we still haven't let the escrow agent in on this structure.  Greg
called about an hour ago and said he was working on comments to the escrow
agreement.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King;& Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>
;

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 3:23 PM
To: Campbell, Carolyn
Subject: Re: ENA Agreement as to Forms of Agreements

Is there anything we need to get them to consent to?

Kay

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 04/19/2001 02:17:42 PM

To:   "'gregorylang@paulhastings.com'" <gregorylang@paulhastings.com>,
      "'iparker@freshfields.com'" <iparker@freshfields.com>
cc:   "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>, "Keffer, John"
      <JKeffer@KSLAW.com>

Subject:  ENA Agreement as to Forms of Agreements

 <<30b202!.DOC>>

Greg and Isabel:

Enclosed is the initial draft of a letter agreement by ENA consenting to
the
form of the ENA Consent, the Promissory Note, the Security Agreement and
the
Financing Statement, prepared along the same lines as the GE consent.
Please review and advise of any comments.   Thank you.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

Enclosure 140366v2

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not
the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

(See attached file: 30b202!.DOC)

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.


Here's the proposal to form the Team.

Note that the complete team list includes:

&The MRT will be led by Philippe Auclair, and will include Market Participant
Advisor (MPA),
Eric Woychik, Market Assessment Advisor (MAA), Steven Stoft, and any others
appointed by the
Board.

&The Market Design Group may be comprised of a number of national experts on
energy
market structure and regulation, and to be used as needed by the MRT. Severin
Borenstein,
Joe Bowering (PJM,s Market Monitor), William Hogan, Paul Joskow, and Frank
Wolak have all
expressed their willingness to assist the ISO Board through the Market Repair
Team.8

Does anybody have a read on Bowering from PJM?

Alan Comnes

Susan J Mara@ENRON
03/13/2001 03:06 PM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve
Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: You Can Put A Stake in Their Hearts but They Never Die

Gang,

Just heard from someone at the ISO that the ISO Board is shoving a new market
approach down the staff's throat.

Rising from the almost dead ...

This "Market Repair Committee" is supported by Eric Woychik, advisor to Board
Member Florio.  The Committee members are Joskow, Hogan, PJM people, et
cetera, et cetera.  There will be something posted on the ISO's web site
shortly.  It will be approved at the Board meeting Thursday.

I'll be there.

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854


Group,

We are short 50 mws for tomorrow at PV through lending with EPE.  25 mws will be under ST-SW, 25 mws will be under ST-WBOM.

We are also short 65 mws for tomorrow at SP-15.  25 mws will be under ST-WBOM, 40 mws will be under ST-CALI.

Both schedules are HE 7-22.  All deals should be under appropriate books.  Please take extra time with the EPE lending.  We would like to do this size throughout August and want to make sure they have no problems.  Details regarding prices and deal numbers will be coming from Kate.

Thanks,
Bill


I agree with Julian's explanation. We should not consider anything a 'done
deal' until we receive the notification from trading and and deal is booked
as a live trade.

In the interin, I'll become familiar with the deal terms.

Dale

Julian Poole@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
08/19/99 06:42 PM
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Don Black/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Federico
Cerisoli/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Brent
Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale
Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: ISDA

Tana,

Regarding the proposed deal, the attached file describes the terms agreed
upon with Duke (similar structure than C. Puerto's swap, except that now
Enron sells & Duke buys). Duke's trader with whom I have been talking to is
Amy Statler, located in their BsAs office.
After reading the e-mail below sent by Erik Ludtke, from Duke, in which he
mentions "ISDA agreement, partially executed by ECT.", and later requests the
confirmation letter, I still have my doubts on what Confirmation Letter he's
talking about. I think he's referring to the receipt letter for the ISDA
document they sent and not the Confirm of this particular deal. Prior to this
Confirm, we would need an ECT trader to get on the phone with Duke and
execute the deal.

Let me know what you think and the outcome of your conversation with Roni
Cappadonna.

Thanks, Julian

To: Julian Poole/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Don
Black/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Federico
Cerisoli/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Brent
Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale
Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: ISDA

So far as much as I've been able to track, the Houston Confirmation Desk does
not know about this Duke Confirm yet.  Don, can you contact Dale Neuner on
the Confirmation Desk ASAP with the proposed deal terms so he can prepare the
Confirm and get it sent over to Duke.  Thanks!
---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 08/19/99 02:28 PM
---------------------------
From: "Julian Poole/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT" AT ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@CCMAIL on
08/19/99 06:44 PM
To: Tana Jones@ECT
cc: Sara Shackleton@ECT, Federico Cerisoli AT ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@CCMAIL, "Don
Black/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT" AT ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@CCMAIL, Brent Hendry AT
ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@CCMAIL
Subject: Re: ISDA

Tana, do you know what's the "Confirmation Letter" Duke is talking about in
the e-mail below? They are requesting us to send it to them.

Julian
---------------------- Forwarded by Julian Poole/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
19/08/99 14:40 ---------------------------

Federico Cerisoli
19/08/99 19:43

To:   "Erik Ludtke" <elludtke@duke-energy.com>
cc:   "Roni A Cappadonna" <vacappadonna@duke-energy.com>, "Alejandro Felices"
<axfelices@duke-energy.com>, Don Black/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Sara Shackleton@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Brent
Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Julian
Poole/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject:  Re: ISDA

Good!  I hope this is the first of a number of transactions we enter into
together.   Please have your people sending the ISDA back to our lawyers in
Houston with Duke's signature so we then complete the loop.

Julian, would you please co-ordinate asap with our Houston staff to have them
sending the confirmation to Roni at the fax number below?  Thanks.

"Erik Ludtke" <elludtke@duke-energy.com> on 08/19/99 10:07:36 AM

To:   Federico Cerisoli/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:   "Carol F. Graebner" <cfgraebner@duke-energy.com>, "Amy J Statler"
<ajstatler@duke-energy.com>, "Roni A Cappadonna"
<vacappadonna@duke-energy.com>, "Alejandro Felices"
<axfelices@duke-energy.com>, "Maria Zocchi" <mzocchi@duke-energy.com>

Subject:  ISDA

We are in receipt of the ISDA agreement, partially executed by ECT.

We would like for ECT to send the confirmation letter to Roni Cappadonna in
Houston, at 713-627-4778.  The fax number is 713-627-6524.


Please print.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/11/2000 02:08
PM ---------------------------

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 12/11/2000 01:54:04 PM
To: "'gkutzschbach@fulbright.com'" <gkutzschbach@fulbright.com>,
"'areynaud@coral-energy.com'" <areynaud@coral-energy.com>,
"'dwhaley@coral-energy.com'" <dwhaley@coral-energy.com>,
"'TSeigler@coral-energy.com'" <TSeigler@coral-energy.com>
cc: "'Ben.F.Jacoby@enron.com'" <Ben.F.Jacoby@enron.com>,
"'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>, "'Rebecca.Walker@enron.com'"
<Rebecca.Walker@enron.com>, "Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com>

Subject: Final Letter Agreements

 <<2R6LRED.DOC>>  <<2RM3RED.DOC>>  <<2RLSRED.DOC>>

We have enclosed the following documents for your review:

 1. Final draft of the Letter Agreement for CA Energy
Development I, LLC, marked to reflect revisions from the draft circulated by
King & Spalding earlier today;

 2. Final draft of the Letter Agreement for CA Energy
Development II, LLC, marked to reflect revisions from the draft circulated
by King & Spalding earlier today; and

 3. Final draft of the Letter Agreement for CA Energy
Development II, LLC pertaining to the transformer, marked to reflect
revisions from the draft circulated by King & Spalding earlier today.

Please circulate a revised draft of the Guaranty Agreement and advise as to
when Coral can meet for execution of the Letter Agreements and the Guaranty
Agreements. Thank you.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King &  Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

Enclosures: 128541vR14/13
  129099vR5/4
  129088vR6/5

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - 2R6LRED.DOC
 - 2RM3RED.DOC
 - 2RLSRED.DOC


sorry, yes it is the same.

You're killing me. We have no definition for first contingency must run. Is
this the same as First Contingency Emergency Dispatch?

HELPPPPPP.

ckm

From: Reagan Rorschach/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/31/2001 11:08 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, David Fairley/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:

Subject: RE: MDEA Agreement Scheduling

Please fill in the blank:
&First Contingency Transmission Outage8 means [Rorschach, Reagan]  an Entergy
transmission constraint that from time to time results in a transmission cut
and mandates Clarksdale dispatching their generation assets to serve
Clarksdale Native Load.
Our obligation during such an event:  During first contingency must run
conditions, EPMI will document the production costs, megawatts generated,
duration of the event, and lost opportunity costs.

From: Reagan Rorschach/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/31/2001 10:37 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: RE: MDEA Agreement Scheduling

I'm still waiting on David Hunt to send me some stuff, which would really
help move the document along.  I'll ask again if i can get it from him. There
are still internal questions in it, which I have annotated. I'm happy for you
to look at it fairly shortly, especially if you can give definitive
commercial direction.

Do you feel that the commercial team is  finished with the exhibits?  I
haven't worked on them, but I suspect the exhibits need work.  I know the
bogey calc doc is a bit rough. [Rorschach, Reagan]  Exhibits are rough.  I
need to make a list of Exhibits called out in the current doc version, pull
them all together, and clean them up.

Do you still owe me the emergency transmission cut stuff? [Rorschach, Reagan]
  Yes.  I am not exactly sure of the context....but try this on for size:
Clarksdale is subject to an Entergy transmission constraint that from time to
time results in a transmission cut and mandates Clarksdale dispatching their
generation assets to serve Clarksdale Native Load.  Dispatching Clarksdale
assets under these circumstances is known as the first contingency must run
condition.  During first contingency must run conditions, EPMI will document
the production costs, megawatts generated, duration of the event, and lost
opportunity cost of buying from the market.  Clarksdale is due reimbursement
from Entergy for extra costs incurred during such events.

Early next week is better than later, and Thursday and Friday are huge
problem days for me.  When are you thinking of meeting with Beck?  Anyway to
combine the two at once, given the short timeframe? [Rorschach, Reagan]  I
think we could get everyone together at the same time as soon as Monday.  I
want them to have the time to study the document so we can get it all done at
once.

Has Dave signed the extension, by the way? [Rorschach, Reagan]   done,
fedex'ing to MDEA.  Will have faxed copy today.

Kay

From: Reagan Rorschach/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/31/2001 09:59 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: MDEA Agreement Scheduling

Kay,

We are starting to run into some scheduling constraints for next week, at
least with Bob Priest.  I'd like to get together with Bob and Marvin early
next week to discuss the agreement--moving toward finalizing before June 12.
Bob is only available Monday.  Bob and Marvin think it is a good ideal to
then meet with RW Beck.

I'd like to email Marvin and Bob the next version sometime today?

Reagan C. Rorschach
Enron North America
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas 77002
713.345.3363


UserName: CAMPB54792

You have an electronic trade confirmation in your Inbox.  To retrieve your
trade confirmation you may login to Datek Online and choose Document Delivery
from the Account Services menu, or you may click on the link below:

https://tumble2.datek.com/posta?x=1-5033976-5010740-X3DPF1NO

You have received this message because you subscribed to electronic delivery
for your Datek Online account.  If you wish to stop receiving account
documents via electronic delivery, you may cancel your subscription by
logging into Datek Online and choosing "Settings" from the
Account Services menu.

For more information please call Customer Support at 1-888-U2-DATEK, or send
email to support@datek.com.

Thank you for trading with us.

Datek Online Brokerage Services
Member NASD / SIPC


I updated the Transco rates and fuel for April.  It is in the "Offseason
Rate" tab in the "2000tran03" file.


FYI.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/19/2001 08:30 PM -----

	andy brown <andybrwn@earthlink.net>
	03/19/2001 07:36 PM
	Please respond to abb; Please respond to andybrwn

		 To: Katie Kaplan <kaplan@iepa.com>
		 cc: "'Alex Sugaoka (E-mail)'" <alex.sugaoka@uaecorp.com>, "'Bill Carlson
(E-mail)'" <william_carlson@wastemanagement.com>, "'Bill Woods (E-mail)'"
<billw@calpine.com>, "'Bob Ellery (E-mail)'" <bellery@spi-ind.com>, "'Bob
Escalante (E-mail)'" <rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Bob Gates (E-mail)'"
<bob.gates@enron.com>, "'Carolyn A Baker (E-mail)'"
<cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "'Cody Carter (E-mail)'"
<cody.carter@williams.com>, "'Curt Hatton (E-mail)'"
<Curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com>, "'Curtis Kebler (E-mail)'"
<curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "'David Parquet'"
<david.parquet@enron.com>, "'Dean Gosselin (E-mail)'"
<dean_gosselin@fpl.com>, "'Doug Fernley (E-mail)'"
<fernley.doug@epenergy.com>, "'Douglas Kerner (E-mail)'" <dkk@eslawfirm.com>,
"'Duane Nelsen (E-mail)'" <dnelsen@gwfpower.com>, "'Ed Tomeo (E-mail)'"
<ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>, "'Eileen Koch (E-mail)'" <eileenk@calpine.com>,
"'Eric Eisenman (E-mail)'" <eric.eisenman@gen.pge.com>, "'Frank DeRosa
(E-mail)'" <frank.derosa@gen.pge.com>, "Frazier Blaylock (E-mail)"
<frazier_blaylock@ogden-energy.com>, "'Greg Blue (E-mail)'"
<gtbl@dynegy.com>, "'Hap Boyd (E-mail)'" <Hap_Boyd@enron.com>, "'Hawks Jack
(E-mail)'" <jack.hawks@gen.pge.com>, "'Jack Pigott (E-mail)'"
<jackp@calpine.com>, "'Jim Willey (E-mail)'" <elliottsa@earthlink.net>, "'Joe
Greco (E-mail)'" <jgreco@caithnessenergy.com>, "'Joe Ronan (E-mail)'"
<joer@calpine.com>, "'John Stout (E-mail)'" <john_h_stout@reliantenergy.com>,
"'Jonathan Weisgall (E-mail)'" <jweisgall@aol.com>, "'Kate Castillo
(E-mail)'" <CCastillo@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Kelly Lloyd (E-mail)'"
<kellyl@enxco.com>, "'Ken Hoffman (E-mail)'" <khoffman@caithnessenergy.com>,
"'Kent Fickett (E-mail)'" <kfickett@usgen.com>, "'Kent Palmerton'"
<kent.palmerton@williams.com>, "'Lynn Lednicky (E-mail)'"
<lynn.a.lednicky@dynegy.com>, "'Marty McFadden (E-mail)'"
<marty_mcfadden@ogden-energy.com>, "'Paula Soos'"
<paula_soos@ogden-energy.com>, "'Randy Hickok (E-mail)'"
<rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, "Rick S. Koebbe (E-mail)"
<rskoebbe@powerworksinc.com>, "'Rob Lamkin (E-mail)'"
<rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, "'Roger Pelote (E-mail)'"
<roger.pelote@williams.com>, "'Ross Ain (E-mail)'" <ain@worldnet.att.net>,
"'Stephanie Newell (E-mail)'" <stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "'Steve
Iliff'" <siliff@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Steve Ponder (E-mail)'"
<steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "'Susan J Mara (E-mail)'" <smara@enron.com>, "'Tony
Wetzel (E-mail)'" <twetzel@thermoecotek.com>, "'William Hall (E-mail)'"
<wfhall2@duke-energy.com>, "'Alex Makler (E-mail)'" <alexm@calpine.com>, "Bob
Szymanski (E-mail)" <rjszymanski@powerworksinc.com>, "'D. Frank (E-mail)'"
<dfrank@seawestwindpower.com>, "'David Dickey (E-mail)'"
<david.dickey@calenergy.com>, "'Doug Levitt (E-mail)'" <SDL@calwind.com>,
"'Ed Maddox (E-mail)'" <emaddox@seawestwindpower.com>, "'Eric Edstrom'"
<edstrome@epenergy.com>, "'Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)'"
<Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>, "'Julie Simon (E-mail)'" <jsimon@epsa.org>,
"'Lucian Fox (E-mail)'" <lucian_fox@ogden-energy.com>, "'Mark J. Smith'"
<mark_J_smith@fpl.com>, "'Milton Schultz (E-mail)'" <bfpjv@c-zone.net>, "'Nam
Nguyen'" <nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>, "'Paul Wood (E-mail)'"
<paul_wood@ogden-energy.com>, "'Pete Levitt (E-mail)'" <Pete@calwind.com>,
"'Rich Dyer (E-mail)'" <rich_dyer@ogden-energy.com>, "'Robert Frees
(E-mail)'" <freesrj@apci.com>, "'Scott Harlan'" <harlans@epenergy.com>, "'Ted
Cortopassi (E-mail)'" <ted_cortopassi@ogden-energy.com>, "'Thomas Heller
(E-mail)'" <hellertj@apci.com>, "'Tom Hartman'" <tom_hartman@fpl.com>, "'Ward
Scobee (E-mail)'" <wscobee@caithnessenergy.com>, "Carol H Hudson (E-mail)"
<Chudson@iepa.com>, "Steven Kelly (E-mail)" <steven@iepa.com>, "Andy Brown
(E-mail)" <ABB@eslawfirm.com>, "Bob Weisenmiller (E-mail)"
<rbw@mrwassoc.com>, "Jan Smutny-Jones (E-mail)" <smutny@iepa.com>,
jmpa@dynegy.com, runwithmee@aol.com
		 Subject: IEP FERC/ISO: Draft IEP FERC Cmts on Staff Report

Attached in Word format are the draft IEP comments, due to be filed on the
22nd, regarding the FERC Staff Report on market monitoring and market power
mitigation.  This is my suggested approach, which is obviously subject to
change per our discussion during the call tomorrow.

I would like to highlight that the draft characterizes the approach as a
"circuit breaker" during periods of highest demand and suggests that this is
distinct from notions of market power abuse.  Other entities are arguing that
during the highest demand, when it exceeds available supplies, all suppliers
have and are "exercising" (as distinct from abusing?) market power.  The
draft attempts to highlight the current regional supply context characterized
by the drought as a rationale for the "emergency circuit breaker."

As mentioned in Katie Kaplan's email this morning, if your company has a
draft of comments, we would appreciate an opportunity to look at them to
avoid substantive conflicts.

I trust this is the right distribution list but I was not able to use the
list from this morning's email because of computer problems at my end.  ABB

--
Andrew Brown
Sacramento, CA
abb@eslawfirm.com

 - DRAFT_010318_el00-95-012_IEP_Cmts_Staff_Rpt.doc


Toni-

Here is a copy of my friends resume again.  Let me know if you can get him in
for an interview.

Thanks,

Matt Lenhart


***  Respond to Debra Davidson by April 30 ***

Trading, Origination, Asset Services, and Community Affairs have purchased a
box suite (17 seats) at PGE Park.  This entitles these groups the opportunity
to have a total of 17 people attend each home Beavers and Timbers game.  The
Enron PGE Park Committee (comprised of some employees from the groups above)
is working together to ensure equitable distribution of tickets so that
everyone on the floor will have an opportunity to attend games.

In order to allocate tickets in the most beneficial way to those who are
interested, please respond to the following questions by Monday afternoon,
April 30.  If you would prefer to reply verbally, stop by Debra's desk and
she will write them down.  Debra also has information about the games if you
have questions.

Are you interested in attending any Timbers soccer games?
If yes to Timbers games, about how many games would you like to attend?
If yes to Timbers games, how many tickets would you be interested in getting?

Are you interested in attending any Beavers baseball games?
If yes to Beavers games, about how many games would you like to attend?
If yes to Beavers games, how many tickets would you be interested in getting
for each game?

If you have no interest in attending Beavers or Timbers games, please let
Debra know.

Keep in mind that there must be at least one Enron employee with guests.
Tickets cannot be given away or sold.  Contact Debra if you have any
questions.


no problem!

: )
Taria

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jones, Tana
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 1:07 PM
To:	Reed, Taria
Subject:	RE: Datasheet

Taria,

Thanks for your help, I really appreciate it!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Reed, Taria
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 1:06 PM
To:	Jones, Tana
Subject:	RE: Datasheet

here are the last two on the list

 << File: datasheets.doc >>
Taria

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jones, Tana
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 11:26 AM
To:	Reed, Taria
Subject:	RE: Datasheet

I just got handed another list...

Can I get the datasheets for the following companies:

Enron Global Markets LLC
Enron Liquids Fuels, Inc.
Enron Fuels Caribbean L.P.
Enron Petrochemicals Company
Enron Gas Liquids, Inc.
Enron Clean Fuels Company
Enron Reserve Acquisition Corp.
Enron Capital & Trade Resources Singapore Pte Ltd
Enron Capital & Trade Global Resources Corp.
Enron Capital & Trade International Corp.
Enron Capital & Trade International Corp. - Singapore Branch

Thanks!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Reed, Taria
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 11:16 AM
To:	Jones, Tana
Subject:	Datasheet

Attached are datasheets for:
Enron North America Corp.
Enron Canada Corp.
Enron Power Marketing Inc.
ECT Investments, Inc.
Enron Credit Inc.
(all on one document)

Taria Reed
Corporate Secretary Department
ext. 57628

 << File: datasheets.doc >>


Cordially,
Mary Cook
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Mary Cook/HOU/ECT on 05/17/2001 05:20 PM -----

	Cyndie Balfour-Flanagan@ENRON
	05/17/2001 03:01 PM

		 To: Linda S Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D
Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R
Brackett/Enron@EnronXGate, Stacey Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Bridgette Anderson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Anthony Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan
Elledge/NA/Enron@Enron, Sharon Gonzales/NA/Enron@ENRON, Marlene
Hilliard/HOU/ECT@ect
		 Subject: Division/Tradename audit

Attached is a report listing all Master Contracts or 'Executed' contracts
with the counterparty's provided by Bill Hare classified as either "Division"
or "Tradename" within the Global Counterparty ("GCP") Database for ENA
Physical Gas & ENA Financial (those Financial agreements in the Financial -
North America Global Maintenance Group). Differences in Counterparty names
(difference between those in the database & what is listed on the contract or
on appropriated contract duplication) are shown in red. This does not
necessarily mean that the name is incorrect; the Global Counterparty Group
may have additional information or documentation supporting the difference
that has not made it into the contract file.

Bill, can someone from your group review these differences & provide
documentation where available so that we may complete our contract files?

As I understand it (Bill please verify), according to the business rules
built into the GCP Database, those counterparties established as a Division
or Tradename must be linked to a CP record classified as "Headquarter".
Therefore, these records are included on exposure reports. However, if a
counterparty name is a Division or Tradename & classified as "New - Needs
DnB" or potentially misclassified as "Headquarter", then the business rules
requiring that the record link up to the actual Headquarter entity within the
GCP Database do not impact the record set-up (Bill, is this a potential
scenario). Furthermore; these records, because they do not link up to a
Headquarter & because credit recognizes them as "Division" or "Tradename",
will not be included in any exposure reports (Debbie, is this correct). Thus,
this then becomes the potential 'crack' where Enron could have unreported
exposure issues. As such, is there a list anywhere of known Divisions or
Tradenames that we could cross-reference against the GCP Database?

Please let me know if additional information is needed on the attached report
or if there is anything further that I can help with.
Thank you,
Cyndie

Also, thank you Bridgette Anderson, Anthony Campos, Susan Elledge, Sharon
Gonzales, and Marlene Hilliard for all of your help in researching these
agreements.


Janet, the CALME organization does not exist so it might be difficult to
negotiate a transfer price - we need to just do the right thing for Enron -
if you think you are getting stuffed economically then I would work a deal
out with Lavo or Whalley.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 02/06/2001
11:21 AM ---------------------------

Janet R Dietrich
02/06/2001 09:51 AM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: SW501D5A

I do not think ENA should cover the IDC's prior to us taking this turbine. It
would be appropriate for us to pick up IDC's going forward. Your thoughts?
---------------------- Forwarded by Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT on 02/06/2001
09:50 AM ---------------------------

Ben F Jacoby
02/05/2001 08:08 PM
Sent by: Ben Jacoby
To: Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: SW501D5A

Janet:

Did you happen to talk to Dave about whether his agreement on the 501D5A
included taking the IDCs? FYI, they total about $2.5 million. As I mentioned,
CALME wants to move the turbine off their books as soon as possible. Based on
our conversation on Friday, I have told Jody that we will not accept the $1.2
million they paid in error to Siemens Westinghouse, and that I was checking
on our position on the IDCs. Please let me know what your and Dave's position
is on this.

Regards,

Ben


FYI - Attached is a memo I prepared for Dave Wear.  Dave was going to edit
the memo and send it to Simon Halfin as a summary of our discussions on the
Hub Agency Agreement.  I am not sure what the final form was, but I expect
that it was very close to the one attached.  Please do not acknowledge
receipt of this memo as Simon does not know that I prepared it.  Dave spoke
with Simon on Friday and is planning to meet with him this week.  They will
be available to talk with us after their meeting.  I will keep you posted on
when this happens.

Thanks -

Gregg


plz see below for responses in red.
regards.  scott.

James P Studdert@ECT
11/30/2000 02:53 PM
To: Scott Laidlaw/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Matthew
Tezyk/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: James P Studdert/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: FURTHER UPDATE TO Westinghouse 501D5A Generator Damaged,
M/VIndustrialBridge.
Project:
Doc. Nbr.:

More questions; can either of you answer?
---------------------- Forwarded by James P Studdert/HOU/ECT on 11/30/2000
02:49 PM ---------------------------

"Ted Rosen" <trosen@jwortham.com> on 11/30/2000 02:27:21 PM
To: <James.P.Studdert@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Re: FURTHER UPDATE TO Westinghouse 501D5A Generator Damaged,
M/VIndustrialBridge.

Jim,

Sharron seems content with what you have provided regarding Enron's
responsibility to insure, etc.   Thank you.  She is now asking the following:

1.  What is Enron claiming for?
response - siemens westinghouse is/will be claiming for full and total loss
of the generator.  a replacement generator is currently being manufactured in
austria and will arrive in port of houston, tx in the mid april 01
timeframe.  we have a meeting sched with them next week.  we'll attempt to
determine what the "value" of just the generator is from siemens-westinghouse
(i.e., we have a price for the gas turbine generator unit, but not separate
prices for just the gas turbine and the generator).

2.  What is the financial extent of Enron's claim?
response - plz refer to above comment.

It seems to me that the short answers to these questions would be:

1. The cost to repair the generator that Enron was supposed to receive from
SWPC.
response - again, we are talking about a total loss and not just a repair.
plz see above.

2.  Unknown until SWPC actually tears down the generator and determines the
extent of damage and the cost to repair.
response - again, the generator will not be repaired.  therefore, this
question is n/a.

Those answers, however, will certainly provoke further questions such as:

1)  When and where is SWPC going to tear down the unit,  inspect it, and
determine the repair costs?
response - plz see prior email.  also, the generator will not be repaired.
therefore, this question is n/a.

2)  Isn't the water damage just getting worse as the generator just sits
there unopened, with no measures taken to prevent further deterioration?
response - plz understand that siemens westinghouse still has care, custody
and control of the damaged generator.  at this time, siemens westinghouse
considers the generator a total loss.  normally, this would have been a great
question.  however, given the circumstances, this question is n/a.

Jim, if anyone can provide a response to Sharron's questions, please let me
know what you find out.

Thanks,

Thanks,

Ted Rosen

>>> <James.P.Studdert@enron.com> 11/30/00 01:18PM >>>
Will this do?
---------------------- Forwarded by James P Studdert/HOU/ECT on 11/30/2000
01:15 PM ---------------------------

Scott Laidlaw@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
11/30/2000 01:09 PM

To:   James P Studdert/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:   Matthew Tezyk/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ben
      Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Booth/NA/Enron@Enron, Kay
      Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Dan
      Shultz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, trosen@jwortham.com
Subject:  Re: FURTHER UPDATE TO Westinghouse 501D5A Generator Damaged, M/V
      IndustrialBridge.  (Document link: James P Studdert)

thanx for note.

ref: section 19.2.1, cargo insurance of the "purchase contract between
enron equipment procurement company and siemens westinghouse power
corporation (a siemens company) for one (1) w501d5a gas turbine generator
package," y2k(6)-2-98 contract, r3 (ct) 03/17/99, provides that:

"Purchaser shall provide or cause to be provided and maintained for the
period of transportation, in sufficient time so as not to delay Seller's
transportation of the Equipment, Cargo Insurance for Equipment.  Such
insurance will be provided as Marine Cargo Insurance on a warehouse to
warehouse basis insuring Equipment against loss or damage arising from
customary "all-risk" marine perils (including war, strikes, riots and civil
commotion) while in transit.  The deductible (the responsibility of Seller)
shall be Twenty Five Thousand US Dollars ($25,000) for each and every
physical damage loss.  Purchaser shall provide, or cause to be provided,
Seller the opportunity to review and comment on the draft Cargo insurance
policy prior to its placement.  Such review shall occur as soon as
available.  Seller's review shall be limited to 15 days from Purchaser's
submission of draft Cargo Policy.  Purchaser shall incorporate or cause to
be incorporated Seller's suggested changes to the Cargo Policy provided
such provisions are common, customary, and are reasonable commercially
available.  Such policy shall specify Seller as an additional insured and
waive any rights of subrogation against Seller under such policy."

where Purchaser is enron.
where Seller is siemens-westinghouse.
where Equipment "shall mean the CT-Unit and all other material and supplies
to be furnished by Seller pursuant to the Scope of Work."
where CT-Unit "shall mean a nominal 501d5a gas turbine generator econopac
with generator package with all its ancillary and auxiliary equipment."

hope this helps.  we can fax a cc of this section as needed.  plz advise,
including names and fax numbers.  also, plz advise if addl info needed.
regards.  scott.

James P Studdert@ECT
11/30/2000 12:46 PM

To:   Scott Laidlaw/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Matthew
      Tezyk/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:   James P Studdert/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject:  Re: FURTHER UPDATE TO Westinghouse 501D5A Generator Damaged, M/V
      IndustrialBridge.
Project:
Doc. Nbr.:

Please see the comments from Ted Rosen below and advise if this can be
answered.  Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by James P Studdert/HOU/ECT on 11/30/2000
12:41 PM ---------------------------

James P Studdert
11/30/2000 09:23 AM

To:   David Marshall/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:   James P Studdert/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject:  Re: FURTHER UPDATE TO Westinghouse 501D5A Generator Damaged, M/V
      IndustrialBridge.

David, can you come up with the requested documentation, and if there is
none, can you write an explanatory memo as to how this came down?
---------------------- Forwarded by James P Studdert/HOU/ECT on 11/30/2000
09:17 AM ---------------------------

"Ted Rosen" <trosen@jwortham.com> on 11/30/2000 09:19:51 AM

To:   <James.P.Studdert@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  Re: FURTHER UPDATE TO Westinghouse 501D5A Generator Damaged, M/V
      IndustrialBridge.

Jim:

Thanks for the reply. Sharron has focused on the comment that the unit has
not actually been "delivered" to  Enron and that title, ownership, and
custody are still with SWPC.   She is therefore questioning Enron's
insurable interest.

I have commented to her that Enron can insure goods titled to another party
as long as Enron has instructions to insure the goods.  Sharron does not
dispute this, but has asked if there is any documentary evidence that would
show that Enron had instructions to insure this cargo. I think we can
interpret "instructions" liberally.  If there is a purchase order or
similar agreement that states that Enron is to insure the turbine, that
should be sufficient.  Would you please ask for this?

Thanks and regards,

Ted Rosen

>>> <James.P.Studdert@enron.com> 11/29/00 11:08AM >>>
Here's the response, finally.
---------------------- Forwarded by James P Studdert/HOU/ECT on 11/29/2000
11:04 AM ---------------------------

Scott Laidlaw@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
11/29/2000 10:24 AM

To:   James P Studdert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew
      Tezyk/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dan
      Shultz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:  FURTHER UPDATE TO Westinghouse 501D5A Generator Damaged, M/V
      Industrial Bridge.

plz see addl comments below in blue; i.e., reflects conversation with mr.
matt tezyk.
regards.  scott.

---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Laidlaw/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
11/29/2000 10:13 AM ---------------------------

Scott Laidlaw
11/29/2000 08:38 AM

To:   James P Studdert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew
      Tezyk/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dan
      Shultz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:  Re: Westinghouse 501D5A Generator Damaged, M/V Industrial Bridge.
      (Document link: Scott Laidlaw)

regrets.  i thought that this had been previously responded to.  see below
for comments in red.
regards.  scott.

James P Studdert@ECT
11/28/2000 08:51 PM

To:   Scott Laidlaw/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Matthew
      Tezyk/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:   James P Studdert/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject:  Westinghouse 501D5A Generator Damaged, M/V Industrial Bridge.
Project:
Doc. Nbr.:

No one has bothered to respond!  The questions below need to be answered BY
SOMEONE!  Underwriters are growing impatient, and if no response is
forthcoming, they will assume we have withdrawn the claim and close their
file.  Can SOMEONE please respond?
---------------------- Forwarded by James P Studdert/HOU/ECT on 11/28/2000
08:45 PM ---------------------------

James P Studdert
11/15/2000 12:17 PM

To:   Scott Laidlaw/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Matthew
      Tezyk/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:   James P Studdert/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject:  Westinghouse 501D5A Generator Damaged, M/V Industrial Bridge.

Gentlemen, if I've left out who this should be directed to, please forward
to whomever can provide the answers.

Is Enron Equipment Procurement Co. still pursuing a claim against Enron
cargo insurers?
comment - we probably need to discuss this with ena's ben jacoby so that
you can receive specific guidance.  as i understand it, since enron's
insurance (e.g., marine cargo) is primary, enron will pursue a claim
against the enron cargo insurer.
further comment - the answer remains "yes."  again, must discuss with ena's
ben jacoby because of his commercial involvement/expectations.

If so, I must provide proof of ownership of the damaged generator (other
than an e-mail message).  Please provide ASAP.
comment - what do you need?  while enron has made approx. 95% of the
payments for the gas turbine generator unit, it is likely that ownership
still resides with westinghouse - i.e., it was never delivered per the
equipment purchase contract with enron.  again, what type of documentation
do you need?  does it matter if westinghouse is still in the loop?
further comment - at this time, title, ownership, care, custody and control
remain with westinghouse.  further, westinghouse must continue to be in the
loop because the monies for the damaged might ultimately be paid to them -
i.e., westinghouse provides enron with a new replacement generator; then,
westinghouse receives the insurance money to cover their loss/damaged
generator.

Is the generator to be repaired?
comment - no, the generator is not to be repaired.  instead, a replacement
generator is being manufactured in austria for westinghouse and is to be
delivered to the port of houston in the mid-april01 timeframe.

If so, when and where.
comment - n/a.

Underwriters surveyor needs to examine it when it is taken apart.
comment - n/a.

The surveyor was told when he made an inspection at the Port that a
detailed repair estimate would be provided to him on the other unit that
was damaged, and this would provide a guide as to the type of damage on our
unit.
comment - only the generator was damaged.  the gas turbine is complete and
resides in houston.  i do not understand your comment about damage to
another unit
further comment - the "other unit" does not belong to enron - i.e., it
belongs to another westinghouse client.  plz understand that the "other
unit" was immersed deeper in salt water than our unit.  as a result, its
damage was greater.  in that we are getting a replacement generator, we
have to assume that the "other unit" that was also damaged is also being
replaced.  therefore, it can be inferred that the damage estimate for both
generators are approximately the same.

To date, nothing has been sent to our surveyor.
comment - none.
further comment - we are not sure about your statement.  our understanding
is that you previously both communicated with and sent the accident survey
of westinghouse's underwriter to our surveyor.

As it has been over three months since the unit arrived in Houston in its
damaged condition, if Enron expects to collect from Enron cargo insurers,
we must move forward in providing the information previously requested, or
prejudice Enron's claim to recovery due to lack of cooperation with the
adjuster/surveyor.
comment - noted.


Tana:

None of the CPs on today's list is authorized to trade US power.

WGR Canada, Inc. - not a current CP/not FERC-approved marketer
Alliance Pipeline L.P. -  not a current CP/not FERC-approved marketer
Hunt Petroleum Corporation - restricted by credit.

Leslie


Greg,

Attached for your further handling is the Draft Interconnect Agreement
between HPL and WGR.

Thanks,

Eric Gillaspie
713-345-7667
Enron Building 3886


Let Russ know also so he can break this up for TDS.  Have him create a roll up for South and Northwest and a total west that sums up both.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Love, Phillip M.
Sent:	Monday, January 28, 2002 2:28 PM
To:	Perich, Stephen; Keiser, Kam
Subject:	west region splitting in two

FYI - the west is wanting to split the region into two regions.  Stephen, I know you have been working on mapping the P&Ls for reporting purpose, the attached file breaks down those two regions.  We want to call then Southwest and Northwest.  They will be headed by Phillip Allen and Mike Grigsby respectively.  Please let me know if you have any questions.  Thanks.
PL
 << File: Trader Matrix.xls >>


Drew and I have spoken about his suggested changes to the co-marketing agreement regarding the annual mail-out.  I understand the issue to be that annual mailout to the EnronOnline customer list that we are giving under the stock purchase agreement needs to stand on its own as very valuable consideration (and it is).  The annual mail-out previously referenced in the co-marketing agreement is so similar to the initial mail-out in the stock purchase agreement, that a conclusion could be reached that the annual PR campaign is the real consideration for the 12.5% stock (i.e., that it really takes annual mailings by Enron before Kiodex gets any value out of Enron having done the mailout to its customer list).   Drew indicated that other co-marketing efforts would probably be OK, just not the same ones that we used to get the 12.5%.  Based on this, I have prepared the following revision of Drew's suggestion (since we don't know what that distribution will look like today, I believe we need the items in (i), (ii) and (iii) to limit our exposure on this obligation.

At least once during each twelve-month period during the term of this Agreement, Enron and Kiodex will cooperate in an annual distribution of marketing and promotional materials with respect to the Kiodex Application, provided that (i) any such materials to be distributed shall be in form and substance mutually acceptable to Enron and Kiodex; (ii) the timing, manner, and targeted audience of such distribution shall be mutually agreeable to Kiodex and Enron; (ii) any materials distributed to Enron Customers that are not also Kiodex Customers may only be distributed by Enron and must market or promote the Kiodex Application as an additional functionality of the Enron Web Site available through the Kiodex Lite Tool; and (iii) no such distribution shall result in any expense (including labor and materials) in excess of $________.

Travis McCullough
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street EB 3893
Houston Texas 77002
Phone:  (713) 853-1575
Fax: (713) 646-3490


Does this information reflect the additions of the IBOC or not? Otherwise the info seems to be what is going on right now.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hemstock, Robert
Sent:	Tuesday, June 12, 2001 8:57 PM
To:	Zufferli, John; Greenizan, Bill; Davies, Derek
Subject:	ESBI Review of Export Levels ( OP-333 Review)

Attached is what is apparently a revised export level chart that discloses export levels relative to intra-Alberta load.  Are we in a position to agree/disagree with these figures and/or provide any comments back to EAL?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Churchill-Brown, Jennifer" <Jennifer.Churchill-Brown@eal.ab.ca>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Churchill-Brown+2C+20Jennifer+22+20+3CJennifer+2EChurchill-Brown+40eal+2Eab+2Eca+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, June 12, 2001 3:25 PM
To:	Churchill-Brown, Jennifer; 'Cheryl.Runge@powerpool.ab.ca'; 'dmacnamara@home.com'; 'brian.bullen@candelaenergy.com'; 'christopher_mcdowall@transalta.com'; 'Garyh@encoreenergy.com'; 'gkmacintyre@duke-energy.com'; 'hly@enmax.com'; Zufferli, John; 'pbartsch@utilicorp.com'; 'wayne_oconnor@transcanada.com'; Hemstock, Robert; 'ksdukart@duke-energy.com'; 'Anita Lee'; Bert Adam (E-mail); Bob Low (E-mail); Byron Dudley (E-mail); Dale Mitchell (E-mail); Don Adair (E-mail); Doug Hincks (E-mail); Doug Little (E-mail); Doug Smeall (E-mail); Geoff Wagner (E-mail); Glen Sutton (E-mail); Jim Balshaw (E-mail); Jim Capp (E-mail); Ken Willis (E-mail); Kevin Berg (E-mail); Kevin Billinton (E-mail); Kim Logan (E-mail); Ligong Gan (E-mail); Mike Asgar-Deen (E-mail); Mike MacDougall (E-mail); Mike Windsor (E-mail); Nigel T. J. Pimblett (E-mail); Otto Lenz (E-mail); Peter Schubert (E-mail); Randy Rowland (E-mail); Taras J. Konowalec (E-mail); Tony Rutkunas (E-mail); Vipin Prasad (E-mail)
Cc:	Ritter, Fred; Baker, Rob; Johnson, Katie
Subject:	RE: OP-333 Review

Dear All,

In keeping with work-overload-tradition the wrong attachment was added to
the previous email (below).  Attached is the table discussed in the email
sent out earlier this afternoon.

   <<op-333-update.xls>>
Please accept our apologies for this inconvenience.

Jennifer M. Churchill-Browne
Engineering Clerk
ESBI Alberta Ltd.
Phone: 403-705-5264
Fax: 403-266-2128
Email: jennifer.churchill-brown@eal.ab.ca
For the latest information from Alberta's Transmission Administrator, visit
our web site at www.eal.ab.ca

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Churchill-Brown, Jennifer
> Sent:	Tuesday, June 12, 2001 3:14 PM
> To:	'Cheryl.Runge@powerpool.ab.ca'; 'dmacnamara@home.com';
> 'brian.bullen@candelaenergy.com'; 'christopher_mcdowall@transalta.com';
> 'Garyh@encoreenergy.com'; 'gkmacintyre@duke-energy.com'; 'hly@enmax.com';
> 'John.Zufferli@enron.com'; 'pbartsch@utilicorp.com';
> 'wayne_oconnor@transcanada.com'; 'robert.hemstock@enron.com';
> 'ksdukart@duke-energy.com'; Anita Lee; Bert Adam (E-mail); Bob Low
> (E-mail); Byron Dudley (E-mail); Dale Mitchell (E-mail); Don Adair
> (E-mail); Doug Hincks (E-mail); Doug Little (E-mail); Doug Smeall
> (E-mail); Geoff Wagner (E-mail); Glen Sutton (E-mail); Jim Balshaw
> (E-mail); Jim Capp (E-mail); Ken Willis (E-mail); Kevin Berg (E-mail);
> Kevin Billinton (E-mail); Kim Logan (E-mail); Ligong Gan (E-mail); Mike
> Asgar-Deen (E-mail); Mike MacDougall (E-mail); Mike Windsor (E-mail);
> Nigel T. J. Pimblett (E-mail); Otto Lenz (E-mail); Peter Schubert
> (E-mail); Randy Rowland (E-mail); Taras J. Konowalec (E-mail); Tony
> Rutkunas (E-mail); Vipin Prasad (E-mail)
> Cc:	Ritter, Fred; Baker, Rob; Johnson, Katie
> Subject:	OP-333 Review
>
>
> Review of EAL Policy OP-333
>
> ESBI Alberta Ltd (EAL) and the Power Pool of Alberta (PPoA) have, upon
> request, reviewed the Alberta to BC Hydro export transfer levels.  The
> levels, shown on the curve in TA-OP 333 on page 13, and tabulated by the
> PPoA in POB - 12, have been reviewed to more accurately reflect transfer
> levels and show a smoother transition especially at the lower end of the
> export curve at 150 MW.  The review does not show transfer levels which
> deviate from the curve published in OP-333 and does not reflect any new
> information regarding the interconnection to BC Hydro.
>
> Confirmation is required from stakeholders, and we request a response by
> 2001-06-19 to opsdata@eal.ab.ca   Any questions regarding the policy
> should be directed to either Robert Baker or Fred Ritter.
>
>  << File: OP-333_Final.doc >>
>
> Jennifer M. Churchill-Browne
> Engineering Clerk
> ESBI Alberta Ltd.
> Phone: 403-705-5264
> Fax: 403-266-2128
> Email: jennifer.churchill-brown@eal.ab.ca
> For the latest information from Alberta's Transmission Administrator,
> visit our web site at www.eal.ab.ca
>

 - op-333-update.xls << File: op-333-update.xls >>


yes