To Members of the RTO West Provisions and Requirements Content Group:

Hello!

As you may already know, at last Friday's meeting, the RRG agreed that
the RTO West process should refocus its efforts over the next few weeks
on, at a minimum, congestion management and pricing.  Just what that
means for the other content groups is unclear, although it is possible
that some will continue and others will be put on hold until critical
congestion management and pricing decisions are made.  The Coordinating
Team is preparing a recommendation and participants will be informed
about the changes to the work plan and schedule in the near future.

I think it is likely that the work of the Provisions and Requirements
Content Group will be put on hold for some time, and that the April
17-18 retreat will be rescheduled.  That said, you should wait until you
receive the final word on the schedule before you change your plans.

I will keep you posted.

Take care!  Kristi


Thank you for the inof town guests in .vitation but I have out


Attached is an Agreement and Release Form that Michelle would like for you to
review.  She is on the phone with you now regarding this attachment.


Perfectly replayed.

Let me know if you need anything further to proceed immediately.

Thanx,
Laura

	From:  Kay Mann                           08/30/2000 05:01 PM

To: Laura Luce/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Manlove Monetization

Since the time frame is short, I wanted to give you an outline to mark
up/correct.

Here's how I understand the deal:

People's has the Manlove gas storage facility.  We have presented to People's
a nonphysical method to monetize it, similar to what was done with Bammel.
Since this is a regulated asset, regulatory approval will be required, and
the consumers will receive part of the benefit of the monetization.  The
essence of our deal is that Enron will receive 50% of the net earnings, up to
$25mm, as our fee.  In consideration for this fee, Enron takes the financial,
legal, accounting and engineering lead. Peoples and Enron will work together
on the regulatory strategy formulation and implementation.

We want to present a draft MOU to Peoples this week.  The basic goals are:

Define scope of the agreement
Define our lead role in the 4 stated areas
Create exclusivity for Enron
Define financial arrangements (cost/profit)
Get an acknowledgement that what was presented to them was proprietary, and
covered by our confidentiality agreement.
Define term (5 years)

Each party bears their own internal costs, and third party costs are split
50/50, with prior approval.  In that regard an immediate concern is getting
the engineering work kicked off.

We want the agreement broad enough to cover physical withdrawals.  We do not
want it specific to this field, since we want the benefit of the use of our
methodology.

Please correct/supplement, etc.

Thanks,

Kay


I think this is a fine attempt, but I continue to believe that a pure
relative ranking offers the most flexibility and is more like the way the
process works in practice.  A separate list of desired behaviors, criteria
etc can be used to guide discussion but I believe the ranking itself should
remain purely relative.

Gina Corteselli
09/14/2000 06:04 PM
To: Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: PRC cluster descriptors - draft

All;

Aattached are a draft of the PRC cluster descriptors which we discussed
several weeks back.  I has sent a first draft to Michelle and Dick, and both
had some suggestions which I have tried to incorporate.  I am still awaiting
Dick and Michelle's impressions of the below, but also  look forward to your
impressions and input. Likewise I would appreciate your input on whether or
not we need to change the ratings on the feedback forms to numerical ratings
1-5 to mimic the clusters.  look forward to hearing from you,  Many thanks,
Gina
---------------------- Forwarded by Gina Corteselli/Corp/Enron on 09/14/2000
05:54 PM ---------------------------

Gina Corteselli
09/14/2000 05:03 PM
To: dick@jeannerett.com
cc: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: descriptors again

Dick; here is another try at the descriptors.  I tried to apply the
information you provided and to describe qualities of an employee's
performance . I'm  not sure whether this is any better, but would appreciate
your input.  What I am finding most challenging writing descriptors which are
interchangeable with all levels and job groups within the company.  The
behaviors these describe and measure need to be general in nature so that
they can apply to a VP and an admin assistant, as well as to all four Peer
Groups within Enron.

Likewise, I would appreciate your thoughts on the necessity/value of changing
the feedback forms to reflect the same numerical ratings.  presently the
feedback forms use the same descriptors as the cluster (i.e. Superior -
Issues).  In your opinion should these also be 1-5 ratings with one = to
highest and 5= to lowest in scale?
I look forward to hearing your thoughts and impressions.  You may either
e-mail me or call me on 713 345-3377.  Many thanks in advance, Gina
******************************************************************************
****************************************
1 = Relative to his/her peers, this employee is a visionary who identifies
new ideas and methods, inspires and motivates others by example, embodies
Enron's vision and values, and demonstrates a mastery of the business and
technical skills necessary to excel in his/her position.

2 = Relative to his/her peers this employee drives change, demonstrates
vision and values, displays resourcefulness when faced with unexpected
challenges, and comprehends and effectively uses the business and technical
skills required to perform his/her job.

3 = Relative to his/her peers this employee supports innovation and
improvement, understands Enron's vision and values, and continues to develop
the core skills and business/technical skills necessary to satisfy the
requirements of his/her position.

4 = Relative to his/her peers this employee accepts change, demonstrates some
independent thinking and can apply resources and business and technical
skills to adequately perform his/her job.

5 = Relative to his/her peers this employee has difficulty accepting change,
lacks resourcefulness, offers minimal contribution and  does not demonstrate
the skills or knowledge to fulfill the responsibilities of the position  This
employee must make changes or termination is likely.


Sean,

I confirmed with Ed in Houston that we should cease deliveries.

Steve

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Crandall, Sean
Sent:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 10:27 AM
To:	Thome, Stephen; Hall, Steve
Subject:	Modesto 7 MW COB deal @$19.3.

We've been keeping this deal in because I've been concerned about congestions at COB.  I'm not concerned going into February, so this contract is out of the money for February (probably in March thru May however).  If there is some reason to keep it whole, we have the length at COB.  Let me know what we want to do.


What is the nature of the confidential information being discussed?  Will our
standard language "...furnished in connection with a possible transaction or
other business relationship..." suffice, or do you want to be more specific?
Also, do you want the bilateral form?

	Paul Finken/ENRON@enronXgate
	02/21/2001 11:18 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: NDA's

Tana,

I need three NDA's drafted and I would like to see at least one of them
before being sent.

Monterey Designs Systems, Inc.
894 Ross Drive, Suite 100
Sunnyvale, CA 94089-1443
Phone: 408 548 4681
Fax: 408 747 7377
Signer: Bill Alexander
VP Marketing
email:bill@mondes.com

Softknot Corporation
46500 Fremont Blvd, Ste 716
Fremont, California 94538
Signer: Mo Mohaved, CEO & Founder
Phone:510 226 3750
Fax:510 226 2776
email:mmovahed@softknot.com

GreenAsh Corporation
38 Watermill
Sugarland, TX 77479
Signer: Vinh Nguyen, CEO & Founder
Phone 281 989 9823
Fax: 419 831 0787
email:vnguyen@greenash.com

thanks

pf


The Global Accounting Steering Committee meeting scheduled for Tomorrow, Nov. 27 at 9:00 has been canceled.


PG&E will announce via press release very early next week an open season on Redwood, Baja and Silverado.
It comes in direct response to recent announcements of expansions into California by pipelines.
The bid protocols will be structured similar to original open season from the original Gas Accord.
The open season will start on June 1 and end on July 31.
Capacity will be available starting 1.1.03.
Bidders will be able to bid up to 30 years (PG&E states that that's what generators want).
Accompanying the announcement will be another announcement that PG&E will expand Redwood by 200mmcf/day, which they hope to have available by 1.1.03, or some time during Q103.
About 2-4 weeks after the open season begins, PG&E will file its proposed "Gas Accord II,"  (the first one expires end of 02).
As part of that filing, PG&E will offer its proposed ratemaking treatment for the next five years (beginning 1.1.03).
PG&E will not include in the open season 1) core capacity and 2) certain EAD contracts that extend beyond the Gas Accord 1 end date.
In addition, PG&E will hold back an additional 20% (after excluding core and EAD), to be "open-seasoned" at some "future" date.
The capacity to be auctioned is: 1) 900 mmcf/day on Redwood, 2) 245 (annual) on Baja, plus an additional 200/day in summer on Baja, 3) 155 on Silverado.
How PG&E will market the 20% they intend to hold back, and when they might auction it off in the future will be discussed in PG&E's Gas Accord II filing.
No single company will be awarded more than 30% of the capacity on any specific path in the primary open season (though firms can bid whatever level of capacity they choose).

Please forwad along to anyone else who might be interested.  If you have any questions, just holler.

Best,
Jeff


If your job is not going well read this:  Nickolas Hall, expert in
psychobiology gives an example of coping skills for job stress:  When
you
have an "I hate my job day" try this:  On your way home from work, stop
at
your pharmacy and go to the thermometer section. You will need to
purchase
a
rectal thermometer
made by Q-Tip. Be very sure that you get this brand. When you get home,
lock
your doors, draw the drapes and disconnect the phone so you will not be
disturbed during your therapy. Change to very comfortable clothing, such
as a
sweat suit and lie down on your bed. Open the package and remove  the
thermometer.  Carefully place it on the bedside table so that it will
not
become chipped or broken. Take out the written material that accompanies
the
thermometer and read it. You will notice that in small print there is a
statement:
Every rectal thermometer made by Q-tip is personally tested. Now, close
your
eyes and repeat out loud five times, "I am so glad I  do  not work in
quality
control at the Q-tip Company."  See...your job isn't really that bad
after
all...


EFCU to check Disney Discount


Per John Lavorato,  Mike Grigsby will put 50 million in schedule C reserve on
August 25,  Philip Allen will put 25 million in schedule C reserve on August
25,  and Keith Holst will put 25 million in schedule C reserve on August 25.


I will approve.  However, I feel there are too many operations people with access to move budget dollars around.  Please review list from Danette Campbell and let me know who I can delete.

Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sap Security
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 7:52 AM
To:	Phan, Kim
Cc:	Bayles, Timothy; Walters Jr., Harry; Geaccone, Tracy; Concklin, Elaine
Subject:	FW: P00406292 - 643012 Kim Phan (Eva)

Kim,

As stated on Monday's email (due to your transfer from Wholesale EES to ETS), the following Wholesale EES roles have been removed from you SAP profile:

FN_GL Viewer Enterprise
FN_GL Journal Entry Accounting Enterprse
FN_GL Journal Posting Mgt (Enterprise)
FN AP Data Viewer - EES
FN AR VIEW - EES
FN CO VIEWER EES
DataWarehouse User Role - EES
FN FI Consolidated Viewer-WHOLESALE EES

However, the following roles have been approved and granted to your SAP profile:

  1. Add FN CO Analyst-ETS
   2. Add FN CO Internal Order Analyst
   3. Add FN CO CCA Planner
   4. Add FN CO PCA Planner
   5. Add FN CO Master Data Creator BU
   6. Add FN FI Consolidated Viewer-ETS

We are pending approval from the following approvers:

Pending Timothy Bayles' Approval:
   1. Add FN PS Viewer
   2. Add FN PS Project Controls Engineer
   3. Add FN PS Project Budget Controller

Pending Harry Walters' Approval:
   3. Add FN EC Consolidation Data Viewer - Legal Consolidation

Pending Tracy Geaccone's Approval:
   6. Add FN IM Capital Budget Appropriation Requestor

User's Current Access:
Std End-User profile for basis and prntg
FN_GL Viewer Enterprise
FN_GL Journal Entry Accounting Enterprse
FN_GL Journal Posting Mgt (Enterprise)
HR EMployee ESS CATS Enterprise HR
FN AP Data Viewer - EES
FN AR VIEW - EES
FN CO VIEWER EES
DataWarehouse User Role - EES
FN FI Consolidated Viewer-WHOLESALE EES

Thank you,
ISC SAP Security (Eva)

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Zahn, Gary
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 11:18 AM
To:	Sap Security
Subject:	RE: P00406292 - 643012 Kim Phan (Eva)

approved.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sap Security
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 7:56 AM
To:	Zahn, Gary; Bayles, Timothy; Geaccone, Tracy; Walters Jr., Harry
Cc:	Phan, Kim; Concklin, Elaine
Subject:	P00406292 - 643012 Kim Phan (Eva)

Kim:  Your remedy ticket number is 643012.  Because you are transferring out of Wholesale EES into ETS, please be advised that your old EES roles (listed below) will be removed on 10/16/01.
FN_GL Viewer Enterprise
FN_GL Journal Entry Accounting Enterprse
FN_GL Journal Posting Mgt (Enterprise)
FN AP Data Viewer - EES
FN AR VIEW - EES
FN CO VIEWER EES
DataWarehouse User Role - EES
FN FI Consolidated Viewer-WHOLESALE EES

Kim Phan (Wholesale EES) is requesting access to the below ETS role(s) and its pending your approval.  Please email your response to SAP Security.  If you have any questions, please contact her supervisor.

Pending Gary Zahn's Approval
   1. Add FN CO Analyst
   2. Add FN CO Internal Order Analyst
   3. Add FN CO CCA Planner
   4. Add FN CO PCA Planner
   5. Add FN CO Master Data Creator BU
   6. Add FN FI Consolidated Viewer-ETS

Pending Timothy Bayles' Approval:
   1. Add FN PS Viewer
   2. Add FN PS Project Controls Engineer
   3. Add FN PS Project Budget Controller

Pending Harry Walters' Approval:
   3. Add FN EC Consolidation Data Viewer - Legal Consolidation

Pending Tracy Geaccone's Approval:
   6. Add FN IM Capital Budget Appropriation Requestor

User's Current Access:
Std End-User profile for basis and prntg
FN_GL Viewer Enterprise
FN_GL Journal Entry Accounting Enterprse
FN_GL Journal Posting Mgt (Enterprise)
HR EMployee ESS CATS Enterprise HR
FN AP Data Viewer - EES
FN AR VIEW - EES
FN CO VIEWER EES
DataWarehouse User Role - EES
FN FI Consolidated Viewer-WHOLESALE EES

Thank you,
ISC SAP Security (Eva)

-----Original Message-----
From: Phan@mailman.enron.com [mailto:Phan@mailman.enron.com]
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 4:51 PM
To: Sap Security
Subject: SAP Security Request Form

The following request information was recently submitted...

REQUESTOR INFORMATION:

   Business Unit:                ETS
   Cost Center:                  111386
   Company Code:                 0179
   Business Unit for Roles:      ETS
   SAP ID:                       P00406292

GENERAL INFORMATION:

   Supervisor:                   Elaine Concklin
   Supervisor Telephone Number:  713-853-5521
   Employee Name (Last,First,M): Phan, Kim
   Employee Location:            3AC-3318
   Employee Telephone Number:    713-345-5026
   Employee Email Address:       kim.phan@enron.com
   Job Title:                    Sr. Financial Planning Specialist
   SAP User Type:                Enron Employee

   Business Reason:
   Will be joining the ETS Financial Planning group effective
   10/16/2001 and needs access in order to perform her
   new duties in SAP.

VIEWER ROLES:
   1. Add FN CO Viewer
   2. Add FN PS Viewer
   3. Add FN EC Consolidation Data Viewer - Legal Consolidation

FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING ROLES:
   1. Add FN CO Analyst
   2. Add FN CO Internal Order Analyst
   3. Add FN CO CCA Planner
   4. Add FN CO PCA Planner
   5. Add FN CO Master Data Creator BU
   6. Add FN IM Capital Budget Appropriation Requestor

PROJECT SYSTEM ROLES:
   1. Add FN PS Project Controls Engineer
   2. Add FN PS Project Budget Controller

JOINT VENTURE ROLES:
   No roles in this area were selected.

MATERIALS MANAGEMENT / PURCHASING ROLES:
   No roles in this area were selected.

CENTRALIZED ROLES (LIMITED TO SPECIFIC PERSONNEL):
   No roles in this area were selected.

HUMAN RESOURCES (HR PERSONNEL ONLY):
   No roles in this area were selected.

HUMAN RESOURCES - TIMEKEEPERS:
   No roles in this area were selected.

HUMAN RESOURCES - BENEFITS (BENEFITS PERSONNEL ONLY):
   No roles in this area were selected.

HUMAN RESOURCES - PAYROLL (PAYROLL PERSONNEL ONLY):
   No roles in this area were selected.


Enron and Dynegy each announced today that they are holding discussions about a possible merger of the two companies.  As you know, Dynegy is a major player in the energy marketplace, and is not only a competitor, but also a counterparty of Enron.  This is just one of several options that we are considering.

Upon receipt of this announcement, the NYSE briefly suspended trading of both Enron and Dynegy.  We have no additional information we can share at this time.  We'll keep you updated as developments occur.


Kristin,

I think that we have done enough for this guy. All we can do is to give
somebody a chance.
The God helps those who help themselves.

Thanks for all your help and your efforts.

Vince

Kristin Gandy@ENRON
11/01/2000 03:19 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: My son

Vince,

I left a message with one of Yaron's roommates on Thursday afternoon for him
to call ASAP for an interview on Sunday.  I guess he took the wrong number
down but I do not understand this because the roommate read the number back
to me and it was correct.  When I did not hear from Yaron I called on Friday
and left a voice mail with my cell and office numbers.  I still did not hear
from him and called again yesterday morning.  I finally received a call at 4
pm yesterday but by that time my team and myself were half way back to
Houston.  Sorry it did not work out.  I have a call into Charlene Jackson as
to how she wants me to proceed and I will get back with you.

Kristin

Vince J Kaminski@ECT
11/01/2000 08:40 AM
To: John Goodpasture/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Kristin Gandy/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: My son

FYI

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 11/01/2000
08:47 AM ---------------------------

"Shmuel Oren" <oren@ieor.berkeley.edu> on 10/31/2000 02:27:18 PM
To: <vkamins@ect.enron.com>
cc:
Subject: My son

Vince
Apparently the recruiter spoke to one of my son's  roommates and left a phone
number (713) 343-3214 which he tried several times  and got busy signals.
Today she called just before you called me and left her  cellphone number but
he was in classes all morning and got the message in the  afternoon. I really
appreciate your going out of your?way to help. Perhaps  there will be another
opportunity.?
Shmuel?


Please forward to whomever else needs it.  Thanks.

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 06/21/2001 04:47 PM -----

	Ann.Cohn@sce.com
	06/21/2001 04:45 PM

		 To: kmccrea@sablaw.com, mkahl@ka-pow.com, jdasovic@enron.com,
wbooth@booth-law.com, drothrock@camfg.com, smutny@iepa.com,
brbarkovich@earthlink.net, dominic.dimare@calchamber.com, isenberg@hmot.com,
dhunter@s-k-w.com, jstewart@cmta.net, mdjoseph@adamsbroadwell.com,
lga@mother.com, djsmith@s-k-w.com, debinorton@aol.com, cra@calretailers.com,
jredding@aol.com, derek.naten@roche.com, vjw@cleanpower.org,
mflorio@D058661.sce.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: URG Testimony

 Attached is the testimony on the revenue requirement for SCE owned
generation and contracts (including QFs) that was filed yesterday in
response to the ACR.  There was also an appendix B, which contains the
advice letter filings referred to in the testimony.  These advice letters
(1521-E, 1528-E-A, 1528-E-B and 1534-E-A) are available on the SCE website
(www.sce.com), and then clicking on Regulatory Info Center.

(See attached file: 6-20-01-sce-Letter re Testimony.doc)(See attached file:
6-20-01-sce-13.doc)(See attached file: appendix A.doc)

 - 6-20-01-sce-Letter re Testimony.doc
 - 6-20-01-sce-13.doc
 - appendix A.doc


Not unless you want me too.

Stacey Bolton
Environmental Strategies
Enron Corp
713-853-9916 direct
713-303-2632 cell
sbolton@enron.com <mailto:sbolton@enron.com>

-----Original Message-----
From: Ring, Richard
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 3:06 PM
To: Bolton, Stacey
Subject: FW: Question about the Enron Power Marketings Purchase from BPA
&Grant Co

Stacey,

Do you want to participate when I make contact with Drake Johnson?

-----Original Message-----
From: Drake Johnson [mailto:DJohnson@energy.state.ca.us]
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 4:33 PM
To: rring@enron.com
Subject: Question about the Enron Power Marketings Purchase from BPA
&Grant Co

Richard,
Please give me a call.  I have a couple of questions about the source of this generation for the Reconciliation Report I have to do.
Thanks,
Drake

Drake Johnson
California Energy Commission
1516 9th Street, MS 45
Sacramento, CA 95814-5512
Off. 916-653-5898
Fax 916-653-2543


Please find below the GTV project status update for this week. Please see the attached file for the project timeline update in Microsoft Project.

GTV status meeting attendees:  Dave Nommensen, Karima Husain, Francis Lim, Jeremy Wong, Bill Fortney, Nayan Dattani, Russ Severson, Narasim Kasaru, Mike Swaim, Chuck Ames, Geoff Storey, Jay Krish.

Accomplishments:

?	Incorporating physcial deal positions in TDS:
o	Changes to CPR reader process & its unit testing have been completed.
o	Loading prior-day curves into position manager - in test.
o	Changes for the view aggregation - in development (please see the attached project timeline).

?	Single point of deal entry for term deals:
o	Single point of deal entry is now in user testing.

?	Gas Daily deals:
o	Changes to PortCalc application to create GDI calc in ERMS are complete and ready for testing.
o	IT development items are in progress and on schedule (please see the attached project timeline).

?	Live feeds for Gas Daily/intra-month curves:
o	Development of live feeds has been completed, tested, user-approved and already in production.

?	Option Grid (phase 2):
o	Conversion from Motif into Powerbuilder has commenced.

?	Gas Daily options:
o	Changes to PortCalc application have been completed and ready for testing.

?	Completed Inception document and timeline for GTV Phase 2

Plans for the week ending 4/27/01:

?	Continue IT development of Phase I items.
?	Complete sign-off for GTV-II, Phase 2 issues and timeline.
?	Continue IT development of Phase 2 issues.

Issues / Open Items:

?	Implement "Group of Groups" for Cash Positions just as they are in Position Manager.
?	Verify with users if GDI Calc in ERMS should be done via 1 or 2 PortCalcs.

Thanks, Dave N


Don,

Greg would love to see you.  What about lunch on the 13th?  (He's in PRC all
day on the 12th)  Lets say 11:30a.m.   We're located at EB2801.

Take Care,

Liz

Don Black@ENRON
09/01/2000 10:01 AM
To: Greg Whalley@ECT
cc:
Subject: Assist

Greg,

I will be in Houston for a few days the week of the 11th of September.  I
would appreciate your help as a career guidance counselor.  I would like
-+30mins of your time on the afternoon of the 12th or the morning of the 13th
of Sept.  If this works for you, have Liz contact me to set something up.
Thanks, Don


Attached for your information is the latest version of the Watch Report that RAC maintains for EWS.  The format has been revised to a more streamlined two page report.  If you have questions or comments, please call me at ext. 3-3905.  Regards,   Rick C.


Tanya,

This will confirm that you and my other clients have decided to go forward
with initiating arbitration in the above-referenced matter, despite the
up-front costs, and are comfortable with your own assessment of the risks of
Triad having no executable assets, as well your own view that from a policy
basis, this matter needs to go forward to make sure that other traders don't
try the same thing.

I will prepare an arbitration demand and submit it for the review of anyone
who needs to see it before it goes out.  It will be very short.  Please let
me know who (if anyone) would like to see a draft first.

Britt

	Tanya Rohauer@ECT
	12/11/2000 01:56 PM

		 To: Britt Davis/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russell
Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Triad

This should confirm the result of our meeting last Friday in which all
parties agreed to move forward with pursuing a judgement against Triad Energy
Resources for our outstanding receivable of $1,779,000.  Please send updates
regarding the proceedings to me as they become available.

Thanks,
Tanya


What are my choices for dates?
---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 07/06/2000
03:44 PM ---------------------------

David W Delainey
06/29/2000 10:48 AM
To: Jeffery Ader/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D
Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Blair/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Bryan Burnett/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Carrick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph
Deffner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Craig A Fox/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Julie A Gomez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Jakubik/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Josey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Fred Lagrasta/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J
Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Thomas A Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gil
Muhl/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jesse Neyman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Edward Ondarza/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M
Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Schwieger/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bruce Sukaly/Corp/Enron@Enron, Colleen
Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Swerzbin/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Thompson/LON/ECT@ECT,
Carl Tricoli/Corp/Enron@Enron, Greg Wolfe/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Billy Lemmons/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Executive Impact and Influence Course

Folks, you are the remaining officers of ENA that have not yet enrolled in
this mandated training program.  It is ENA's goal to have all its officers
through the program before the end of calendar year 2000.  The course has
received very high marks for effectiveness.  Please take time now to enroll
in the program. Speak to your HR representative if you need help getting
signed up.

Regards
Delainey


---------------------- Forwarded by Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT on 09/18/2000
09:48 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Julie A Gomez                           09/17/2000 04:49 PM

To: Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Gaskill/Corp/Enron@Enron, Stephanie
Miller/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Fred Lagrasta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer
Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Expiring Transportation Contracts

The attached worksheet is an updated version of the transportation and
storage contracts that are expiring by interstate pipeline over the time
period Sept 00 through March 2002.

Please call if you have any questions.

Julie  :-)


Frank,

I don't think the issue is how the books are calced/officialized on those
days.  Here why.  The same calc is used the day before and for the rest of
the following month.  The physical calc is simply copied each day.  On Jan.
31, extending the expert clause to include Feb is the only change made.  Once
Feb rolles to intramonth the "From date" on the calc is changed from the Jan
1 to Feb 1.  Since January has already rolled off this should have no effect
on the positions.  Also, the positions for prompt month were correctly
captured by Risktrac, which leads me to believe that problem is with the VAR
calc not the post ids.

Let me know if this doesn't answer your question.
Robin

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Frank Hayden @ ENRON                           02/07/2001 07:31 AM

To: Wei Hu/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Bharat Khanna/NA/Enron@Enron, Nilay Basu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robin
Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: INTRA-WEST-PH1

Wei,
I appreciate your help. If I hear you right, it appears it may have to do
with the way post id's and books are officialized.  Thanks for your help.

Robin,
For whatever reason, we didn't pick up VaR for Feb intra-month on Jan 31, and
on Feb 1, a lot of intra month hit.  I've been investigating, with Bharat,
and RAC initially thought it had something to do with the code and that GRMS
didn't roll in physical until the first of the month (I guess).  Now it seems
like it may have something to do with the way Post id's/books are
officialized. (I guess).  Please give this a looksy and let me know.

Nilay,
Thanks for your help, any ideas on why would be helpful.

Let me/Bharat know if we should bring ERMS into the picture.

Thanks,
Frank

	From:  Wei Hu @ ECT                           02/06/2001 04:24 PM

To: Bharat Khanna/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Frank Hayden/Corp/Enron@Enron, Nilay Basu/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: INTRA-WEST-PH1

Bharat,

First I checked VaR number for this portfolio_id since 26-JAN-01.  Notice
there was consecutive VaR jump from 26-JAN-01 to 1-FEB-01.

PORTFOLIO_ID    EFF_DT        DOWN95       UP95
--------------- --------- ---------- ----------
INTRA-WEST-PH1  26-JAN-01 -534098.14  468809.11
INTRA-WEST-PH1  29-JAN-01 -2472601.4 2351240.92
INTRA-WEST-PH1  30-JAN-01 -4860067.9 4509638.58
INTRA-WEST-PH1  31-JAN-01 -5771829.8 5412690.81
INTRA-WEST-PH1  01-FEB-01   -6776703 6805456.84
INTRA-WEST-PH1  02-FEB-01 -6328870.8  6454349.9
INTRA-WEST-PH1  05-FEB-01 -5535044.3 5546160.24

Then I checked sum of delta_position and gamma for book_id INTRA-WEST-PHY on
those dates.  Since I notice that VaR had a big jump from 26-JAN-01 to
29-JAN-01, so I also group by reference data on those two dates.

  1  select ref_dt, strip_flag, sum(delta_position), sum(gamma)
  2  from rms_open_position
  3  where eff_dt = '&1'
  4  and book_id = 'INTRA-WEST-PHY'
  5  and nvl(strip_flag, 0) >= 0
  6  group by ref_dt, strip_flag
  7* having (sum(delta_position) > 0 or sum(gamma) > 0)

Effective_dt 26-jan-01

REF_DT    STRIP_FLAG SUM(DELTA_POSITION) SUM(GAMMA)
--------- ---------- ------------------- ----------
30-JAN-01          3          152041.923          0
31-JAN-01          3          161992.376          0

Effective_dt 29-jan-01

REF_DT    STRIP_FLAG SUM(DELTA_POSITION) SUM(GAMMA)
--------- ---------- ------------------- ----------
31-JAN-01          3          153524.414          0
01-FEB-01          3          156324.294          0
02-FEB-01          3          156324.294          0
03-FEB-01          3          156324.294          0
04-FEB-01          3          156324.294          0
05-FEB-01          3          156324.294          0
06-FEB-01          3          156324.294          0
07-FEB-01          3          156324.294          0
08-FEB-01          3          156324.294          0
09-FEB-01          3          156324.294          0
10-FEB-01          3          156324.294          0

REF_DT    STRIP_FLAG SUM(DELTA_POSITION) SUM(GAMMA)
--------- ---------- ------------------- ----------
11-FEB-01          3          156324.294          0
12-FEB-01          3          156324.294          0
13-FEB-01          3          156324.294          0
14-FEB-01          3          156324.294          0
15-FEB-01          3          156324.294          0
16-FEB-01          3          156324.294          0
17-FEB-01          3          156324.294          0
18-FEB-01          3          156324.294          0
19-FEB-01          3          156324.294          0
20-FEB-01          3          156324.294          0
21-FEB-01          3          156324.294          0

REF_DT    STRIP_FLAG SUM(DELTA_POSITION) SUM(GAMMA)
--------- ---------- ------------------- ----------
22-FEB-01          3          156324.294          0
23-FEB-01          3          156324.294          0
24-FEB-01          3          156324.294          0
25-FEB-01          3          156324.294          0
26-FEB-01          3          156324.294          0
27-FEB-01          3          156324.294          0
28-FEB-01          3          156324.294          0

The following is the list of sum of delta position on those dates without
group by reference_dt:

EFFECTIVE_DT STRIP_FLAG SUM(DELTA_POSITION) SUM(GAMMA)
------------ ---------- ------------------- ----------
   26-JAN-01          3          314034.299          0 (Reference date
30-JAN-01 to 31-JAN-01)
   29-JAN-01          3          4530604.63          0 (Reference date
31-JAN-01 to 28-FEB-01)
   30-JAN-01          3          8901557.37          0 (Reference date
01-FEB-01 to 28-FEB-01)
   31-JAN-01          3          9539555.15          0 (Reference date
02-FEB-01 to 28-FEB-01)
   01-FEB-01          3          8782018.97          0 (Reference date
01-FEB-01 to 28-FEB-01)
   02-FEB-01          3          7889069.32          0 (Reference date
06-FEB-01 to 28-FEB-01)
   05-FEB-01          3          7597454.74          0 (Reference date
07-FEB-01 to 28-FEB-01)

It looks to me the trend on VaR change is very similar to the trend on delta
position change.  If you want to know why delta position went higher from
26-JAN-01 to 01-FEB-01, we need to get ERMS people involved.  RisktRAC
basically just pulls position from ERMS.

Thanks,

Wei


-----Original Message-----
From: Stein, Neil [mailto:neil.stein@csfb.com]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 7:38 AM
To: undisclosed-recipients
Subject: CSFB Independent Power Weekly--Issue #48; IPPs Rose
0.6%;Califor nia Contracts Get Some Attention; Major Earnings Week Ahead

 <<IPW102201.pdf>>
Good Morning,

Attached, please find the latest issue of our Independent Power Weekly.

Summary:
1. IPPs Rise 0.6%   Last week our IPP composite rose 0.6%, outperforming
both the S&P 500 (-1.7%) and the NASDAQ (-1.9%).  Mirant, which was up 5.2%,
was the strongest generator in the group.  International Power was the
weakest performer, declining 5.8%.

2. Generation Oriented Utilities Fall 0.8%   Our universe of generation
oriented utilities declined 0.8%, outperforming both the S&P 500 and NASDAQ,
while underperforming the UTY (+0.6%).  Constellation Energy, which was up
3.3%, was the strongest performer in the group.  Black Hills was the weakest
performer, declining 5.6%.

3. California Contracts Dominate Investor Attention   Last week there was
some renewed concern among investors that the State of California would
attempt to renegotiate its 53 power sales contracts with various power
generators and marketers.  Over the long-term we see minimal risk for the
generators.  We believe California has few legal options with respect to
these agreements.  Further, the signing of these contracts played a key role
in reigning in spot power prices in the state.  Finally, Governor Davis
apparently does not support a massive contract renegotiation effort.

4. Some Headline Risk Remains   The only issue we see involves headline
risk.  While the Governor and his administration appear to be taking a
restrained approach with regard to the contracts, political pressure to
renegotiate continues to grow from the CPUC and the state Attorney General's
office.  While we ultimately expect such efforts to be unsuccessful, in the
near term this issue will continue to attract media attention.

5. Earnings Season Upon Us   This week the bulk of the IPP's and generation
oriented utilities are scheduled to report earnings.  In the IPP group,
results are expected from: AES, CPN and RRI.  In the generation oriented
utility group, results are expected from: CNL, DPL, ETR, FPL, PPL and XEL.
We expect capital discipline to be a recurring theme emphasized by companies
on their upcoming conference calls.  In response to stock prices which are
trading below private market asset values, we expect management teams across
the sector to de-emphasize growth and begin using stricter hurdle rates when
evaluating new investment opportunities.

Regards,

Neil Stein   212/325-4217

This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information.  No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the
sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve
the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.  Any
views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except
where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state
them to be the views of any such entity.
Unless otherwise stated, any pricing information given in this message is
indicative only, is subject to change and does not constitute an offer to
deal at any price quoted.
Any reference to the terms of executed transactions should be treated as
preliminary only and subject to our formal written confirmation.


Page Montovano
Diane -- pay for part of an admin
Ken Rice
Steve Shackman -- MayaMora Weber 609 279 4094
Cal trip Leave meessage for Eliz and Karen
39504 Sheila Galloway
Ralph Cavanagh (415) 777 -0220
Mike Day 415 781 0701
Meg Nollen


will do.

	Steven J Kean
	01/21/2001 03:49 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: IMPORTANT CONFERENCE CALL ON QF/SRAC MATTERS SCHEDULED FOR
12:30 P.M. (NOONISH) ON SUNDAY, JAN.  21

You need to be aware that we are in the process of selling the Wind Co.  Mark
Metts and Amit Walya are working on this.  If the price changes under the QF
contracts it would impact the sale.  Call Amit to discuss (345-5570).

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	01/21/2001 10:23 AM

		 To: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Angela Schwarz/HOU/EES@EES, Beverly
Aden/HOU/EES@EES, Bill Votaw/HOU/EES@EES, Brenda Barreda/HOU/EES@EES, Carol
Moffett/HOU/EES@EES, Cathy Corbin/HOU/EES@EES, Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Christina Liscano/HOU/EES@EES, Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Craig H
Sutter/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Debora Whitehead/HOU/EES@EES,
Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Dorothy
Youngblood/HOU/ECT@ECT, Douglas Huth/HOU/EES@EES, Edward
Sacks/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Eric Melvin/HOU/EES@EES, Erika Dupre/HOU/EES@EES,
Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Fran Deltoro/HOU/EES@EES, Frank W
Vickers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gayle W Muench/HOU/EES@EES, Ginger
Dernehl/NA/Enron@ENRON, Gordon Savage/HOU/EES@EES, Harold G
Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@ENRON, Iris Waser/HOU/EES@EES,
James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, James
Wright/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, Jeff Messina/HOU/EES@EES,
Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Jess Hewitt/HOU/EES@EES, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathy
Bass/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES, Ken Gustafson/HOU/EES@EES, Kevin
Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Leasa Lopez/HOU/EES@EES, Leticia Botello/HOU/EES@EES,
Mark S Muller/HOU/EES@EES, Marsha Suggs/HOU/EES@EES, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES,
Meredith M Eggleston/HOU/EES@EES, Michael Etringer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Mann/HOU/EES@EES, Michelle D Cisneros/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike M Smith/HOU/EES@EES,
mpalmer@enron.com, Neil Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Neil Hong/HOU/EES@EES, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Paula Warren/HOU/EES@EES, Richard L
Zdunkewicz/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Leibert/HOU/EES@EES, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON, Rita Hennessy/NA/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, Rosalinda Tijerina/HOU/EES@EES,
Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott
Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Sharon Dick/HOU/EES@EES,
skean@enron.com, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tanya Leslie/HOU/EES@EES, Tasha
Lair/HOU/EES@EES, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terri Greenlee/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tim
Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tony Spruiell/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES,
Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathryn Corbally/Corp/Enron@ENRON, fvickers@enron.com,
Michael Etringer/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: IMPORTANT CONFERENCE CALL ON QF/SRAC MATTERS SCHEDULED FOR 12:30
P.M. (NOONISH) ON SUNDAY, JAN.  21

----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 01/21/2001 10:21 AM -----

	"Steven Kelly" <steven@iepa.com>
	01/21/2001 05:42 AM
	Please respond to "Steven Kelly"

		 To: "Wayne Kawamoto" <wkawamoto@wm.com>, "Ward Scobee"
<wscobee@caithnessenergy.com>, "Tony Wetzel" <twetzel@thermoecotek.com>,
"Thomas Heller" <hellertj@apci.com>, "Ted Cortopassi"
<TCortopassi@ogden-energy.com>, "Steve Ponder" <steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "Steve
Iliff" <siliff@riobravo-gm.com>, "Ross Ain" <ain@worldnet.att.net>, "Robert
Frees" <freesrj@apci.com>, "Rich Dyer" <Rich_dyer@ogden-energy.com>, "Pete
Levitt" <Pete@calwind.com>, "Paula Soos" <paula_soos@ogden-energy.com>, "Paul
Wood" <paul_wood@ogden-energy.com>, "Nam Nguyen" <nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>,
"Milt Schultz" <bfpjv@c-zone.net>, "Marty McFadden"
<marty_mcfadden@ogden-energy.com>, "Lucian Fox"
<lucian_fox@ogden-energy.com>, "Ken Salvagno" <kbssac@aol.com>, "Ken Hoffman"
<khoffman@caithnessenergy.com>, "Jonathan Weisgall" <jweisgall@aol.com>, "Joe
Ronan" <joer@calpine.com>, "Joe Greco" <joe.greco@uaecorp.com>, "Jack Pigott"
<jackp@calpine.com>, "Hap Boyd" <hap.boyd@enron.com>, "Frank Misseldine"
<fmisseldine@caithnessenergy.com>, "Ed Tomeo" <ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>, "Ed
Maddox" <emaddox@seawestwindpower.com>, "Duane Nelsen"
<dnelsen@gwfpower.com>, "Doug Levitt" <SDL@calwind.com>, "Doug Fernley"
<fernley.doug@epenergy.com>, "Dean Gosselin" <dean_gosselin@fpl.com>, "Bob
Escalante" <rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "Bob Ellery" <bellery@spi-ind.com>,
"Bill Woods" <billw@calpine.com>, "Bill Carlson" <wcarlson@wm.com>, "Bill
Adams" <sangorgon@aol.com>, "Alex Sugaoka" <Alex.sugaoka@uaecorp.com>, "Tom
Hartman" <Tom.Hartman@fpl.com>, "Eric Edstrom" <edstrome@epenergy.com>,
"Scott Frier" <sfrier@kjcsolar.com>, "William Hall"
<wfhall2@duke-energy.com>, "Susan J Mara" <Susan_J_Mara@enron.com>, "Scott
Noll" <snoll@thermoecotek.com>, "Roger Pelote" <roger.pelote@williams.com>,
"Rob Lamkin" <rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, "Randy Hickok"
<rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, "Lynn Lednicky" <lale@dynegy.com>, "Kent Fickett"
<kfickett@usgen.com>, "Kate Castillo" <ccastillo@riobravo-gm.com>, "Jim
Willey" <elliottsa@earthlink.net>, "Jeff Dasovich" <jdasovic@enron.com>,
"Greg Blue" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "Frank DeRosa" <frank.derosa@gen.pge.com>,
"Eric Eisenman" <eric.eisenman@neg.pge.com>, "Eileen Koch"
<eileenk@calpine.com>, "Dave Parquet" <dparque@ect.enron.com>, "Curtis
Kebler" <curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "Curt Hatton"
<curt.hatton@gen.pge.com>, "Cody Carter" <cody.carter@williams.com>, "Carolyn
Baker" <cabaker@duke-energy.com>
		 cc: "Jan Smutny-Jones" <smutny@iepa.com>, "Katie Kaplan" <kaplan@iepa.com>,
"Carol Hudson" <Chudson@iepa.com>, "Steven Kelly" <steven@iepa.com>, "Andy
Brown" <abb@eslawfirm.com>, "Doug Kerner" <dkk@eslawfirm.com>, "Diane
Fellman" <difellman@energy-law-group.com>
		 Subject: IMPORTANT CONFERENCE CALL ON QF/SRAC MATTERS SCHEDULED FOR 12:30
P.M. (NOONISH) ON SUNDAY, JAN.  21

An important conference call is scheduled for 12:30 p.m. (PST) on Sunday,
Today, Jan 21 to discuss the status of legislative meetings on QF/SRAC
matters.

Call-In number is            888-422-7124
Particpant Code is          111756

Status Report
After a marathon 12 hour meeting with Assemplyman Keeley, Senator Battin, QF
Parties, and SCE, a Keeley sponsored "deal" was proposed at 3:30 a.m. this
morning.  The crux of the deal is as follows:

For renewables and non-gas fired QF, essentially ...

7.8 cents/kwh for delivered power for 5 years ["all in", i.e. includes
capacity and energy]
1.0 on losses
no 'clawback' for wind resources which may have failed to meet fixed capacity
obligations in the past
Applies "going forward" (presumedly Feb. 1)

For gas-fired QFs...

7.8 cents/kwh for five years, assuming gas is $5.60;  payment will
increase/decrease tied to gas  (this assumes an IER of 9821)
1.0 on line losses
applies "going forward"
Caacity True-up and "forbearance" were not addressed.  Credit worthiness will
be address in the technical conference scheduled for later today (Sunday).
This program will require in part legislative blessing and direction,
followed by CPUC approval of individual contract amendments.  This is
essentially the PG&E/QF "deal" for the gas guys.  For the renewables, it is
more of a fixed payment approach.

A "Technical Conference" is scheduled for Sunday (today) in Sacramento to
work out some of the implementing details.


Senator Gramm met with the Chicago Futures Exchanges today.  Tom Ewing also
attended today's meeting. Topics of dicussion included: (no new issues)
identified bank product exclusions; agency transactions; credit screen
exclusion; and retail.  Gramm staff agreed to provide language to the
futures exchanges.  The Senator indicated he would discuss Title III  and
agency transactions and retail with the Treasury Department tomorrow.

Stacy Carey
Director North American Regulatory Policy
International Swaps and Derivatives Association
(202) 457-6545 ph
(703) 256-1833 fax
(917) 543-9622 cell
scarey@isda.org


Hi Kathy,

I neglected to keep a hard copy.  Please send hard copies of the change order
to:  Brian Hulse, Carl Tricoli, and me.  If you prefer, you can just fax it
back, and I will send it to the ENA folks.

Thanks,

Kay


All:

Attached is the latest version.    Note the average price of power assumed
purchased by the DWR, if smoothed to a fixed price equivalent for the 9.5
years beginning 7/1/01, is $106/mwh and $104/mwh if DWR's forward price
curves are used.  We used a range of $82.75 to $104/mwh in our sensitivity
page.   The $82.75 is the mid-point between Henwood and DWR curves.   Enron's
curves are significantly lower on the back-end.   The other switch is for the
allocation of the past utility purchases: 1) one pro rata, and 2)  one where
the non-core shares prorata, plus half the core's portion.  DWR past
purchases are handled pro rata in both scenarios.

Regards,

Michael

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 4:53 PM
To: skean@enron.com; Steffes, James; Shapiro, Richard
Cc: Tribolet, Michael
Subject: Core/Noncore Analysis

Michael Tribolet and I (about 99% Michael) have put together a rough cut
analysis of the core/noncore structure, and some scenarios Hertzberg has
asked for.  Hertzberg's expecting some info from us on Monday (and I'm sure
that he'll want more scenarios, too).  Are you available first thing Monday
morning to be briefed on the analysis, my conversations with Hertzberg, what
Hertzberg's strategy is, etc.?


---------------------- Forwarded by Mark A Taylor/EFS/EES on 05/28/2001 10:25
PM ---------------------------
From: Esmeralda Gonzalez/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/25/2001 02:28 PM CDT
To: Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Armsworth/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathlene
Mosley/ENRON@enronXgate, Mark A Taylor/EFS/EES@EES
cc: Ramona Perkins/ENRON@enronXgate, Holly
Keiser/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Meeting re: Samantha Boyd

Please note the meeting regarding Samantha Boyd has been scheduled for
Tuesday, May 29, 2001 from 1:00 p.m. to 1:30 p.m. in Mary Cook's office
(EB3801).  Please call me at Ext. 5-7621 if you have any questions.

Thanks.

Esmeralda Gonzalez
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB3815
Houston, Texas 77002
e-mail: esmeralda.gonzalez@enron.com
Phone: 713-345-7621
Fax: 713-646-3393


Steve,

Per your request, I've attached a summary of credit exposure with PG&E as of
close of business on February 28th. We are investigating an increase in our
overall position as a result of basis movement in the west over the past few
days.

Please feel free to give me a call at 35856 if I can provide futher
information.


Please approve the following product type in Datamanager after 11:00 p.m.
See the steps for approval below.

US Gas Fin Swap ENA (INTERNAL ONLY)

A financial Swap Transaction with Enron North America Corp., under which the
Seller pays a Floating Price and the Buyer pays the price submitted by
Counterparty on the Website (the Fixed Price) in each case in respect of the
Notional Quantity per Determination Period.  Each calendar month during the
term of the Transaction will be a Determination Period. The Notional Quantity
per Determination Period is the volume submitted multiplied by the number
days in the relevant Determination Period.  The Payment Date(s) will be 5
business days after the Floating Price is determinable. The Floating Price
shall be the average of the Index for each day in the relevant Determination
Period.
The term of the Transaction shall correspond to the date(s) set forth in the
Product description on the Website.
The Index shall be the settlement price for the last scheduled Trading Day of
the NYMEX Henry Hub Natural Gas Futures Contract for the applicable
Determination Period.
The price is quoted in US Dollars per unit of volume, which will be the
Contractual Currency.
The unit of measure against which the price is quoted shall be millions of
British thermal units and the quantity shown shall be in millions of BTUs per
day.

STEPS FOR APPROVAL:

click the  START button
select  PROGRAMS
select  TEST APPLICATIONS
select ENRONONLINE CLUSTER(PROD)
 PROCEED WITH USUAL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click the Enron Online Production Cluster "START" button
select EnronOnLine (this is the EOL Datamanager)
 PROCEED WITH EOL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click on the "+" for EnronOnLine
click on the "+" for Product Types
click on the "+" for "Awaiting Approval" (OR  "Partially Approved")
select the product requiring review as stated in e-mail above
Right "mouse" click on "properties" to view product set-up
TO APPROVE:  Right mouse click on "Approved"


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"iris mack" <irismmack@hotmail.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 10:55 AM
To:	Black, Tamara Jae
Cc:	Burnett, Lisa
Subject:	Return to Harvard

Hi TJ and Lisa,
     Happy 2002!!  I hope this email finds you well.
     This brief note is to inform you that I will be returning to Harvard - where I received my doctorate in Applied Mathematics.
     I have accepted a job offer from the Harvard Management Company - which manages Harvard's endowment of $20 billion (and still counting).
     If you are ever in the Boston area, please do look me up.
     Also, will you please forward this email onto the power group so that some of my other friends will know how to get in touch with me in the future.
Best regards to you and yours in 2002,
Iris Marie Mack, MBA/PhD

P.S.:  During my first couple of months in Boston I will be staying in corporate housing.  Therefore the best way to reach me is via email:  irismmack@hotmail.com .  Thanks!!!

Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. Click Here


Sean,

I think we should  invite Bruce for additional interviews. I think that he
does not have
the skills required in my unit, but he could contribute in other areas.

Here is the list of potential interviewees:

John Echols
Ted Murphy
Mark Ruane

Vince

Sean Grady@ENRON
07/26/2000 02:17 PM
To: Grant Masson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pinnamaneni Krishnarao/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson
Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Zimin Lu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bjorn Hagelmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Port/Market Risk/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Toni Graham/Corp/Enron@Enron, Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rita
Hennessy/NA/Enron@Enron, Dorothy Youngblood/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Interview schedule change for Bruce James

Attached please find the interview packet for the above-referenced person.
The interview will happen Thursday July 27, 2000.  Please print all three
documents for your hard copies.  If you have any questions, or conflicts of
schedule, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Sean Grady
58701


TASK ASSIGNMENT

Task Priority:		1
Task Due On:		3/16/2001
Task Start Date:	3/9/2001


Mike, attached are the parameters that we would prefer to see in an RFP for
the electrical commodity in California.  This approach in any RFP would help
us get the best bid possible for a solicitation.

I understand from our converstaion of last week that Edwards is contemplating
adding the electrical commodity to the RFP that is intended to be used for
privatization of the Edwards electrical distribution system.  Given this, we
have put our jurisdictional discussions with the CPUC on hold pending your
resolution of the content of the RFP.  We cannot request any dispositive
action from the commission on jurisdiction until we can accurately
characterize the elements of the transaction.  Please advise us, as early as
possible whether or not the commodity will be included, and if so, how its
inclusion will be structured.


EES bought:

50mw  OnPk  April-01  Cinergy  $45.00
50mw  OnPk  April-01  Ercot  $51.50


Ever get the POR info?


Thanks very much Dave.  We've got the proposal (and we've got a few issues
with it).

Rog:
I know that you're swamped managing EES' book, etc.  So I'd be happy to fill
Dave in on EES' view of CLECA's proposal, the negotiations that are underway
generally, and what we're cooking up to try to help the negotitations along.
Just let me know.

Also, Dave, be happy to talk to Hanson, and fill them in one what's going on
out there if that would be useful.

Jeff

	David Parquet@ECT
	12/07/2000 03:32 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: CLECA Solutions for the Energy Crisis

I got this from Hanson.  Please advise as to which points we agree with and
which we disagree with.  I want to know because I talk to this guy quite a
bit and EES and ENA are trying to do a deal with him.  I probably will have
several opportunities to influence him, if necessary.  Barbara Barkovich and
Bill Booth probably had a big hand in developing this doc.

Any follow up necessary?
----- Forwarded by David Parquet/SF/ECT on 12/07/2000 01:28 PM -----

	"Bouse, Earl" <EBouse@hansonaggwest.com>
	12/07/2000 09:29 AM

		 To: "Dave Parquet (E-mail)" <dparque@enron.com>, "Lyle White (E-mail)"
<lwhite6@enron.com>, "Dave Kates (E-mail)" <dkates@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: CLECA Solutions for the Energy Crisis

Greetings:

Attached for your information is the subject "solution" document. We have
passed this on to the Governor's staff and Assembly Member Rod Wright has
included it in his briefing book.

<<CLECA Solutions to Electrical Crisis.doc>>

!?????? Earl F. Bouse, Jr.

??????? Hanson Aggregates Mid-Pacific

??????? Hanson Permanente Cement

_??????(925) 426-4084

'?????? (925) 426-4060

??????? ebouse@hansonaggwest.com

??????? earlbouse@aol.com

 - CLECA Solutions to Electrical Crisis.doc


dexterous (DEK-struhs, -stuhr-uhs) adjective, also dextrous

   1. Skillful or adroit, mentally or bodily.

   2. Right-handed.

[From Latin dexter, right-hand, skillful.]

   "Paul Frazier was quietly dexterous on bass, always the stealth weapon
   in Mr. Byrne's music."
   Ann Powers, Same As He Ever Was, But More Appreciated, The New York Times,
   May 15, 2001.

This week's theme: words for physical characteristics used to describe people
figuratively.

............................................................................
The road uphill and the road downhill are one and the same. -Heraclitus,
philosopher (Ca. 540-470 BCE)

Feeling information overload? Sign off a few mailing lists. If you wish
to unsubscribe from AWAD, send a blank message to wsmith@wordsmith.org with
the word unsubscribe in the subject line of your message. Of course, we'd
rather you stay with us. After all, it is only a `word' a day. (-:

Pronunciation:
http://wordsmith.org/words/dexterous.wav
http://wordsmith.org/words/dexterous.ram


Here is some information on one of the students invited to Enron next week by
Tom Gros.
--Stinson

---------------------- Forwarded by Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT on 02/10/2000
05:24 PM ---------------------------

"Juan-Carlos O. Ferrer" <jferrer@MIT.EDU> on 02/10/2000 04:17:17 PM
To: Stinson.Gibner@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Trip to Houston

Hi Stinson, I am Juan-Carlos Ferrer, also Ph.D. student working with Gabriel
Bitran and going to Houston with Amit and Paulo on the 16th. Paulo told me
that you are interested in some information of us before going to Houston.

Well, I am form Chile, married, and father of two girls (3 and 2). I
graduated from the Engineering School at the Catholic University of Chile in
1995 having followed the track in Computer Science during the last 3 years of
school. Then, late in 1995, I was hired by the Industrial Engineering
department as a full-time Assistant Professor of Management Science, where I
was teaching and doing research until June 1997. In August 1997 I came to
Boston to join the Operations Management group in the Sloan School of
Management here at MIT. I already finished courses and qualifiers
requirements of my program, so now I am trying to come up with an interesting
research topic to develop my Ph.D. thesis.

I have been dealing with some interesting topics during the last months but
since Enron appears as an opportunity to find a more challenging and
appealing problem to me I decided to explore it. My intention in going to
visit Enron is to have a better understanding of the bandwidth business in
order to define a problem to work with. I would really like to do a thesis
that involves Internet issues and yield management models, in the line of
Amit's work.

Any other information or question you need, please feel free to contact me.

Looking forward to meeting you on the 16th.

Juan Carlos Ferrer

?? --------------------------------------
????????? Juan-Carlos O. Ferrer
??? Ph.D. student, Operations Management
???? Sloan School of Management - M.I.T.
???? of:(617)253-3597 fax:(617)258-7579
?????? http://web.mit.edu/jferrer/www/
?? --------------------------------------


---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff King/Corp/Enron on 05/16/2001 09:32
AM ---------------------------

Craig Carmichael <cgcarmic@uswest.net> on 05/15/2001 04:38:41 PM
To: robert.benson@enron.com, jeff.king@enron.com, kyle.schultz@enron.com,
doug.gilbert-smith@enron.com, matt.lorenz@enron.com,
paul.j.broderick@enron.com, tom.may@enron.com, mike.carson@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Load Forecasting Technology

To whom it may concern:

My name is Craig Carmichael.  I am a PhD student at Iowa State
University, working under Dr. Bartlett in the Adaptive Computing Lab.
Please lend me your attention for a brief moment.  Enron's team of power
traders is the first contact I have made in this nature.

I strongly believe that I have developed technology that can make Enron
millions in the very near-term future.  If you are a power trader whose
success is proportional to the accuracy of your load forecasts, then I
believe I can deliver an enormous opportunity to Enron and you.  If I am
way off base on my assessment, please let me know and I will go
somewhere else.  I CHALLENGE EACH OF YOU TO DISCREDIT MY BELIEFS.

Here are some of my credentials, so that you can verify that it might be
promising to read the remainder of this email.

   1.  Finishing up ISU PhD work this summer.
   2.  Invented multiple neural network methods and inductive learning
techniques.
   2.  Recently DEVELOPED THE MOST ACCURATE electric load models in the
Chicago area for ComEd.
   3.  Saved ComEd millions of $ over the last couple years because of
this.
   4.  Can verify the above claims and that I did this single-handedly.
   5.  Wrote the new inductive learning algorithm for New Energy
Associates in Atlanta.
   6.  My software will be the new learning engine of NEA's NOSTRADAMUS
future v5.0
   7.  Can verify that I single-handedly wrote NOSTRADAMUS's new training
engine (not yet released)
   8.  Am the world's best electric load forecaster using advanced
inductive learning methods.

This is the situation:

   I am giving my Final Defense on July 16th in areas of advanced
forecasting methods.  In 1999, I developed highly advanced neural
network models for Commonwealth Edison, under Robert Abboud (working at
ComEd) through the Adaptive Computing Lab at Iowa State University.  The
models were the most accurate available.  At the time, ComEd was using
the EPRI models, NEA's Nostradamus, Tesla, and the ISU models (those
that I developed).  Still, I knew of many ways for improvement and have
been waiting for my graduation to release this technology.  Preliminary
studies show that my most recent work is more accurate than anything
that is available at any price.

   Since I have felt oppressed by the system (being a student), I have
awaited graduation (am finished mid-July) to unleash the technology that
I have developed outside of the university (my funding comes from the
Meteorology department and has nothing to do with load forecasting).
This is unpublished, provocative, state-of-the-art stuff that can smoke
even the multi-million dollar EPRI models, and only I know how they
work.  The technology could also put Tesla out of business.  The errors
appear to be LESS THAN HALF OF THOSE OF NOSTRADAMUS.

John Snead from Tesla knows me and feared my models so much that he
tried to merge his company with RGA Labs.  Robert Abboud from ComEd,
Excelon (and now RGA Labs) knows who I am.  Rick Hunt, the project
manager from New Energy Associates does also, since I wrote the software
for their yet-to-be-released inductive learning engine.

Ok.  Here are the possibilities.

   1.  I am making all of this up and did't really invent leading
forecasting technology
   2.  I am a nut who doesn't even know what he's talking about
   3.  This guy couldn't possibly do this sort of thing on his own clock
all by himself
   4.  Maybe there's something to what this guy is saying.  We might as
well send him a data set to test his claims.

I feel that someone will continue to try to take advantage of me if I
don't act now.  Within the next 6 months, someone will probably own my
technology besides myself.  I want to prove that I can be an immense
asset to Enron.  I would like to sell my technology to Enron as part of
your in-house modeling efforts.

Someone else might come along and try to make the same claims that I am
making.  They might razzle-dazzle you with their marketing sense and
ability to sell you their gem.

What I am saying is that if you give me a chance to show you what I can
do, if you care about accuracy and not razzle-dazzle, then I will not
disappoint you.  Give a data set to me and a thousand other people and
companies.  Let me show you that I'm not making all of this up.  I will
show you flaws in other "gems".

I hope this email wasn't too long.  My family & I, as of now, have a
fairly uncertain financial future (until I enter the workforce and have
a fairly cushy job).  Because of this, I am obligated to see what
opportunities exist with my intellectual property.  If I fail in
convincing Enron that I have a gold mine in my possession, then I will
go to the #2 spot on my list, and will offer to provide them with the
leading forecasting package available today.  In some way, shape or
form, in this scenario my software will then compete with Enron.

Thank you for lending me your ear.  I hope you don't think I'm a lunatic
for sending you this lengthy email.

Craig Carmichael
cgcarmic@uswest.net


Steve,

Sorry to cut you off, Dr. Boxleiter called me back.  He was unaware that Dad
might be released soon and also said that he thought that it would be
premature to do so.  He promised to look into Dad's release and let us know
what is going on.  Boxleiter also told me that Dad is on some different
medication: Ridilin (sic), an appetite stimulant, Rimeron, and possibly
Buspar (still).  Mom was unaware of the Ridilin.

Here are the Doctor's telephone numbers:

Boxleiter 584-3500
Herman  557-9111
Schoup  557-9111

Let me know if you and when you reach them so that we don't both badger
them.  I will do the same.  My plan is to call every day until I reach them.
Failing that, I will be in MPLS this week and able to fly down on a moment's
notice.

Take care,

Rob

P.S.  Dad was moved to room 422 which is "Skilled Care" - a Medicare thing.


This deal was entered today - Matt Motley was trying to agree on terms with
the broker, but they didn't get it all tied up until this morning. The deal
is as follows:

Buy Calpine
Palo Verde
25 MW
Q3-01
$300
Broker: TFS

Thanks,
Kate


Karen:
See highlited section of story below.  PG&E's got it right.  Recall that DWR
was only buying power that it determined was "priced reasonably."
Consequently, the net short wasn't getting picked up.  That meant that the
ISO would have to go to the real-time market to close the gap.  The ISO would
then charge the utilities for the power purchased.  Recall that Bob Glynn
referenced the $300 MM/month that continued to pile up on PG&E's balance
sheet as one of the several reasons that PG&E put itself into bankruptcy.
Now that PG&E's in bankruptcy, the state is now responsible for the full net
short, and can't continue to sluff it off onto PG&E's balance sheet.  So it's
therefore no surprise that the State's daily bill for power purchases has
increased dramatically---just not for any of the bogus reasons cited by
Governor Backbone.

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/20/2001 12:31 PM -----

	Ray Alvarez
	04/20/2001 09:56 AM

		 To: Steve Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Alan
Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Rebecca W
Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: CA legislature in doubt

FYI.  Ray

NGI's Daily Gas Price Index
published : April 20, 2001
CA Governor, Regulators Push on, but Legislature Raises Doubts
Two certainties prevailed in California's blighted energy landscape Thursday:
wholesale power bills are getting bigger and state regulators are trying
harder to salvage Gov. Gray Davis' deal with Southern California Edison Co.
But in the state legislature from which the ultimate solutions must come
there was growing skepticism, despite a series of meetings with the governor
earlier in the week.
While nervousness over the state's electricity bill and the prospect of
insufficient power supplies this summer prevailed, Davis met with 25 members
of California's congressional delegation at a Los Angeles airport hotel to
press his case for federal actions to resolve the seemingly endless energy
dilemma.
The California Public Utilities Commission has ordered a statewide
investigation of the contractual obligations of the almost 700 small
(qualifying facility) QF generators toward the utilities, but most of the
five-member commission's activity was focused outside its regular business
meeting in San Francisco. CPUC President Loretta Lynch offered empathy toward
Edison's financial plight and renewed pleas for federal regulators to provide
wholesale price relief.
"I have committed that the CPUC will expeditiously review those provisions of
(Edison's proposed agreement) that require CPUC resolution, and I have taken
steps to begin that process," Lynch said in a prepared statement released
Wednesday. "In the meantime, I commit to reviewing on a priority basis any
and all proposals that promote the financial health of California utilities
and the interests of its consumers."
Davis and some of the CPUC commissioners have been complaining that the cost
of the state's daily purchases of wholesale power on the spot market have
increased from about $50 million to more than $70 million daily since the
April 6 bankruptcy filing of Pacific Gas and Electric Co., but the utility
challenged the conclusion that the court filing caused the latest price
increases.
"While it is understandable, even laudable, that the governor would want to
fully explain the downsides of utility bankruptcy, this claim is simply not
accurate," said PG&E utility spokesperson John Nelson. He argued that the
increase in state payments for power reflect that the state water resources
department (DWR) now is covering all spot purchases, including the often
costly real-time emergency purchases by the state's transmission grid
operator, Cal-ISO.
Thus, PG&E's spokesperson said the more likely cause of the increased power
bill lies with recent moves by federal regulators and Cal-ISO, noting that
the state grid operator should only sell to "creditworthy" entities. These
moves were done independent of the PG&E bankruptcy filing, Nelson said.
As the daily bill for power goes up, draining the state treasury more
quickly, pressure mounts for a resolution to the utility financial situation.
But the legislature has expressed skepticism toward the governor's proposed
deal with Edison. State Senate Leader John Burton (D-San Francisco) told news
media Wednesday that bankruptcy might be the best approach for Edison.
In adopting the new investigations of QF generators, the CPUC's commissioners
acknowledged that eventually the issue of back payments to the small
generators needs to be addressed, particularly to a group representing up to
3,000 MW collectively.


As you know, Enron and Peoples jointly own enovate. Our group in Chicago is
looking to manage some funds which belong to enovate. We had initially
envisioned having a cash management policy which would outline how Enron
would invest the funds, etc.  The other owner of enovate, Peoples, has
proposed that we use the attached document in connection with this
arrrangement.  This is taking me a little far afield of my area of expertise,
so I'm writing you guys for input, direction, etc.

Suggestions? Gregg do you want to correct any of what I wrote?

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 02/15/2001 06:03
PM ---------------------------
From: Gregg Penman on 02/07/2001 11:17 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: inter-company agreement

Kay - This is one of the documents I want to talk to you about.  Please call
me when you have a chance.

Thanks - Gregg
----- Forwarded by Gregg Penman/Corp/Enron on 02/07/2001 11:16 AM -----

	j.burns@pecorp.com
	01/22/2001 03:00 PM

		 To: Gregg.Penman@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: inter-company agreement

 - enovate v2 1-122.doc


This time I mean it:

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/08/2001 11:09
AM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
03/08/2001 11:08 AM
To: Chris Booth/NA/Enron@Enron, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Blue Dog LLC agreement

Attached is the Blue Dog LLC agreement:


maybe we need a closer in that seat

From: Kim Ward/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/08/2001 01:56 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE:

he's a cheapskate - I am just sitting here on the edge of my seat with three
customers that won't pull the trigger!

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Arnold, John
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 1:53 PM
To: Ward, Kim S.
Subject: RE:

how about we celebrate the near completion of your deal and have tickleless
pay for it.

From: Kim Ward/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/08/2001 01:26 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE:

push the summer down about $.03-.04 so I can get one of my deals done and we
could celebrate!

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Arnold, John
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 1:07 PM
To: Ward, Kim S.
Subject:

wanna get sauced after work?


We bought 8000 (deal 160324) and sold it to CES in CPA 4-25 (deal 160327) for
the 2nd.


In case you haven't been able to attend, the Outlook Migration Team has
scheduled more Outlook
demonstrations.; Please email David Brehan <mailto:david.brehan@enron.com>;to
make your reservation.;
(PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE!)
;
Tuesday,;February 13 - Room EB5C2
Session A:;;10:00 a.m. to;11:30 a.m.
;
Wednesday, February 21;- Room EB5C2
Session;B:;;1:00;p.m. to;2:30;p.m.
Session;C:;;3:00;p.m. to;4:30;p.m.
;
If you have questions pertaining to the demonstrations, please call ext.
5-3647.; Questions about the migration or Outlook will be answered during the
sessions.You will not receive a conformation for your reservation.
;
Please note:; These demonstrations are designed to introduce a person to
Outlook.; They are not a
substitute for training.; We recommend attending training to improve your
Outlook skills.


Thanks very much.  And, yes, I did get a haircut.  She cut a TON off.


While seemingly small in the scheme of things these days at Enron, on 12/14/01 EPMI did get a FERC win against MISO's proposed $1000 fee for each non-confirmed transmission service request for firm PTP of one week or longer.  FERC used our (In house written) argument almost verbatim!


This is an unfiled claim by Franklin Adkins, a small gas producer in the Appalachians, for recovery of approximately $336,832.17 for the alleged breach of a gas purchase agreement.  By letter dated December 3, Michael Farrell of Farrell, Farrell & Farrell, L.C., Adkins's attorney, requested that Adkins' named be included in the list of creditors and that a proof of claim be forwarded to Mr. Adkins in accordance with the Court's Scheduling Order.

	Do you need a copy of the letter?  Do I need to make any response?

	Many thanks.

	Britt


Is anyone working on a confirmation for the Argentina office for a swap
between ECT and Duke Energy International out of Argentina, Don Black would
be the business person on this.  If you know, I need to get the draft faxed
ASAP to Duke here in Houston.


Eldoni:

I'm assuming, since I haven't heard back, that we're going to take a pass
this time on the Dome road, and perhaps have Jeff Green do it another time?
If I'm incorrect, we'll need to get things squared away, like today.

Let me know,
Jeff


Yes, I will be on the call.  Thanks very much.

	Joseph Alamo
	05/09/2001 11:34 AM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Conf Call

I don't know whether you both or either of you are aware of this so please
note the attached from Maureen:
---------------------- Forwarded by Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron on 05/09/2001 09:33
AM ---------------------------

Maureen McVicker
05/09/2001 07:25 AM
To: Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Conf Call

Actually it's 11:00 am (CALIFORNIA TIME).  I'm not positive, but I think Jeff
and Sandi need to be on the call.  I thought they would both be in Sacramento
w/ Steve.  If Jeff doesn't know for sure if he is supposed to be on the call,
let me know and I will check with Steve.

Thanks.

---------------------- Forwarded by Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron on 05/09/2001
09:22 AM ---------------------------

Maureen McVicker
05/08/2001 04:48 PM
To: Emy Geraldo/Enron@EnronXGate
cc:

Subject: Tomorrow's Conf Call

---------------------- Forwarded by Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron on 05/08/2001
04:48 PM ---------------------------

Maureen McVicker
05/08/2001 04:11 PM
To: Pam Metoyer/Enron@EnronXGate, Twanda Sweet/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marcia A
Linton/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Tomorrow's Conf Call

Here's the information regarding tomorrow's conference call.

DATE:   Wednesday, May 9

TIME:   11:00 am (Pacific),  1:00 pm (Central)

CALL IN #:  888-422-7132

HOST CODE:  243663  (Steve Kean's use only)

PARTICIPANT
CODE:   569189

ATTENDEES: Jeff Dasovich
   Steve Kean
   Sandi McCubbin
   Richard Sanders
   Jim Steffes
   Michael Tribolet
   Greg Whalley


The report named: Violation/Notification Memo <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=60&report_name=Violation/Notification+Memo&category_cd=2&category_name=ENRON%20CONSOLIDATED&toc_hide=1&sTV1=2&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=08/27/2001>, published as of 08/27/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.

(Revision: 4)


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/07/2000
05:39 PM ---------------------------

Eckao@aol.com on 12/11/99 08:21:06 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: (no subject)

Dear Vince:

        I am in some preliminary dialogues with some faculty in the math
department about the possibility of establishing a special program perhaps at
master's level on financial engineering.  The attach pdf file is my own
sketch about the program. Since you have extensive knowledge about these
things, can you give me some comments.

       Ed

 - FIN_ENGR.PDF


Dear Drew Fossum, :

?

I know what you are thinking another junk email to add to your trash bin. But
WAIT, before you click delete, I would like to urge you to read this email.
This email contains valuable information about CBI's 5th Annual Private
Energy in Turkey Event. Register by November 22 and Save $300. Please mention
Your Priority Code of PB075EMB. Don't miss CBI's 5th Annual Private Energy in
Turkey ) Status of Projects and Sector Restructuring, Financing Options and
Legal Requirementson December 11-12, 2000 in Washington, DC.
http://www.cbinet.com/wconnect/wc.dll?CBEvent~GetMoreInfo~PB075


3 minutes

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ward, Kim S.
Sent:	Monday, June 25, 2001 6:09 PM
To:	Arnold, John
Subject:	RE:

in the galleria?  I need to pick up a dress at saks.  when are you going?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Arnold, John
Sent:	Monday, June 25, 2001 6:01 PM
To:	Ward, Kim S.
Subject:	RE:

	i'm going to run to needless markup real fast.  that have a big sale starting today.  if you don''t want to go, i'll pick you up after...

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ward, Kim S.
Sent:	Monday, June 25, 2001 4:27 PM
To:	Arnold, John
Subject:	RE:

oh yeah, I can quit faking it.  So, what is the plan?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Arnold, John
Sent:	Monday, June 25, 2001 2:49 PM
To:	Ward, Kim S.
Subject:	RE:

	i guarantee it.

	you're not still pulling that leg thing, are you.  we don't work out again until wednesday.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ward, Kim S.
Sent:	Monday, June 25, 2001 2:47 PM
To:	Arnold, John
Subject:	RE:

will it make my leg feel better?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Arnold, John
Sent:	Monday, June 25, 2001 2:23 PM
To:	Ward, Kim S.
Subject:

wanna get toasted tonight?


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Ngo, Toan
Sent:	Friday, October 12, 2001 4:10 PM
To:	Lattupally, Krishna; Saluja, Gurdip
Subject:	RE: Sitara Reporting system down time

Krisha:
8:00 will be OK if we do not fallback.
If we fallback to moe, it will be around 12:00 noon on Sunday.
Please inform the users.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lattupally, Krishna
Sent:	Friday, October 12, 2001 11:18 AM
To:	Severson, Russ
Cc:	Grant, George; Gay, Randall L.; Bike, Anne; Clause, Kristen; Osire, Ann; Wolfe, Jason; Elledge, Susan; Richardson, Stacey; Balfour-Flanagan, Cyndie; Bussell l, Kathryn; 'julie.meyers@aep.com'; Ngo, Toan; Husain, Karima; Lim, Francis S.; Saluja, Gurdip; Lattupally, Krishna
Subject:	Sitara Reporting system down time

Sitara Reporting system  will be down this weekend from 11.45AM Saturday to 8AM Sunday.As soon as system is up I will let you all know.
thanks
Krishna
Ex 35216


totally


Steve -

Simply FYI - Just wanted to send you the cover summary of the confidential
Resource Management Update Report sent to Cindy and Drew each week.  Thanks
for all your support!

-Sarah A. Davis
Ext. 3-5328


Tomorrow is good. I will plan on it @ 12:00.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	kabennick@aep.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-kabennick+40aep+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, September 18, 2001 9:46 AM
To:	Perlingiere, Debra
Subject:	RE: Hi

Debra,
        Can we go tomorrow???  I just ordered a cake from Treebeards for one of our birthdays and need to pick up tomorrow... So how about it???

---------------------- Forwarded by Kimberlee A Bennick/AEPIN on 09/18/2001 10:46 AM ---------------------------
To:        Debra.Perlingiere@enron.com
cc:
Subject:        RE: Hi  Link << File: Notes:///86256A6F005213E2/DABA975B9FB113EB852564B5001283EA/4DFFD22B6872EE0585256ACA007EEEDF >>
Glad to hear from you.... I'm open Wednesday or Thursday.  So just let me know... have not been to Treebeards in a LONG time so we could meet there say around 12:00?  Let me know what day is good for you... kb
Date:        09/17/2001 07:06:34 PM
From:        Debra.Perlingiere
To:        IMCEANOTES-kabennick+40aep+2Ecom+40ENRON@enron.com
cc:
Subject:        RE: Hi
 Great to hear from you!   You have been in my thoughts.  Any day other
than Tuesday this week is fine with me. Let me know.
   -----Original Message-----
  From:   kabennick@aep.com@ENRON
            [mailto:IMCEANOTES-kabennick+40aep+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
  Sent:   Monday, September 17, 2001 10:20 AM
  To:     Perlingiere, Debra
  Subject:  Hi
  Hey girl,
          Are you still there???  Have not seen or heard from you and was
  wondering how you are doing???  Want to meet for lunch sometime and
  catch up on things??????
          My phone number is (832) 668-1456, or my e:mail is
  kabennick@aep.com.
  See ya,
  Kim
**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Lucy,

Here is a draft of a memo we should distribute to the units that are subject
to caps.  I wrote it as if it were from you.  It should come from the manager.

It is very important that we tell new tenants what the utility cap for there
unit is when they move in.  This needs to be written in on their lease.

When you have to talk to a tenant complaining about the overages emphasize
that it is only during the peak months and it is already warming up.

Have my Dad read the memo before you put it out.   You guys can make changes
if you need to.

Next week we need to take inventory of all air conditioners and
refrigerators.  We have to get this done next week.  I will email you a form
to use to record serial numbers.  The prospective buyers want this
information plus we need it for our records.  Something to look forward to.

It is 2 PM and I have to leave the office.  Please have my Dad call me with
the information about the units at home 713-463-8626.  He will know what I
mean.

Talk to you later,

Phillip


Hi Sara,
Any progress on the blackline?  I was hoping to review and determine any
"final" outstanding issues before going back to legal and/or credit.
Although we entered into the deal you referenced without docs in place,
First Union credit had been assured that we were very close to finalizing
our docs before giving approval to proceed with the trade.  As previously
discussed, our equity and credit default business people are also
anticipating our getting docs in place with Enron Corp. and Enron Credit
Limited following completion of Enron North America Corp.   I look forward
to hearing from you.
Dee
Delene M. Travella
Vice President
Capital Markets, Derivatives
Telephone: (704) 383-8778
Facsimile: (704) 383-0575
email: delene.travella@funb.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com [SMTP:Sara.Shackleton@enron.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 2:52 PM
> To: delene.travella@funb.com
> Subject: blackline of master
>
> Dee:
>
> We are working on the blackline.  Since the "deal" that you mentioned
> yesterday has no bearing on the master between ENA and FUNB, there is no
> emergency at hand.  A few things to note:
>
> (1)  regarding "Procedures for entering into Transactions,"  my suggestion
> is that you consider a reasonable time period in which to respond upon
> receipt of a confirmation.  It is in both parties best interest to have an
> executed (and therefore enforceable) writing  This can be accomplished by
> under the NY General Obligations law by our agreement as to a "deemed
> response" if a party will not sign a trade confirmation.
>
> (2)  regarding the concept of "Specified Transaction", ENA has
> reconsidered
> the earlier concession to exclude most Termination Events as Specified
> Conditions.  It is not ENA's position to unwind Transactions upon the
> occurrence of these events, and, therefore, each party ought to be able to
> rely upon the protections afforded it under the related provisions.
> Regarding the Credit Event Upon Merger, FUNB is protected with the
> amendment which we make to Section 5(b)(iv).
>
> I hope that the blackline will resolve our outstanding issues.
>
> Sara Shackleton
> Enron North America Corp.
> 1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
> Houston, Texas  77002
> 713-853-5620 (phone)
> 713-646-3490 (fax)
> sara.shackleton@enron.com


Call Grant about Tony


Thanks for your e-mail.  I am trying to set up a time however, several people
are out today.  I will be in touch.

Best regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Stewart and Paul,

I have heard that MPC has contracted with Avista to do their load balancing. Has anyone contacted MPC to discuss continuing or renewing our relationship with them in the future. MPC is likely month-to-month with Avista as they were with us. Has there been any progress with EPE? What are your expectations for retaining them? Of all our service customers these would be the only two I am truly concerned about getting back. I think we have seen significant revenue from both, more because of the information they provide then because of the fee structures. Please let me know if you have any questions, or if there is anything I can do to assist.

Thanks,
Bill


Y'all,

Stinson forwarded a copy to me last week.  Part 1.1 was published in this
past Monday's edition as is.  I would suggest that unless you see some major
error, don't suggest changes to Samer that would delay the publication of
Part 2, scheduled for this coming Monday.

Sam

Shirley Crenshaw@ECT
06/07/2000 10:14 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pinnamaneni
Krishnarao/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vasant Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike A
Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph Hrgovcic/HOU/ECT@ECT, Grant Masson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tanya Tamarchenko/HOU/ECT@ECT, Zimin Lu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vincent
Tang/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alexios Kollaros/HOU/EES@EES, Martin Lin/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Maureen Raymond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Osman Sezgen/HOU/EES@EES, Paulo
Issler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patricia Tlapek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Farouk Lalji/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Amitava Dhar/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Alex Huang/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ronnie
Chahal/HOU/EES@EES, Kevin Kindall/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin G
Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clayton Vernon/Corp/Enron@ENRON, William
Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Leandro Ibasco/Corp/Enron@Enron, Yanna
Crystal/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jose Marquez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Samer
Takriti/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chonawee Supatgiat/Corp/Enron@Enron, Shalesh
Ganjoo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Halliburton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Elena
Chilkina/Corp/Enron@Enron, Cantekin Dincerler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad
Aimone/NA/Enron@Enron, Datren Williams/NA/Enron@Enron, Eloise
Meza/NA/Enron@Enron, Sevil Yaman/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sofya
Tamarchenko/NA/Enron@Enron, Bob Lee/NA/Enron@Enron, Ainsley
Gaddis/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Bandwidth Writing

Hello all:

Samer Takriti has requested that the attached document be forwarded to
you for your feedback.  Vince would like to put this in the Research
Newsletter.

If you feel changes need to be made, please feel free to do so.

Thanks!

 - fiber.pdf


Thank you!!!
-Heather

At 10:55 AM 11/6/00 -0600, you wrote:

>Here it is.(See attached file: Biography of Jeffrey Dasovich.doc)


Dear Jeff
?
I understand from Mark Schroeder tha you will be on  the Berkeley panel after
mine.? I look forward to meeting you and learning  more about the present
situation there. You could contact me at my hotmail  address this weekend if
you needed to.
regards
Stephen Littlechild


Family Leisure Centre		Springbank Park	NE Sportsplex		 Hunntinton Hills

1	5.40			5.46				5.43			5.47

2	5.34			5.39				5.365			5.40

3	5.315			5.37				5.345			5.375

5	5.335			5.39				5.36			5.39

Go forth and do deals.................................


Janel -- I've set up a conference call w/ Marathon and Peggy for 4:30 p.m.
today to talk about UC/CSU.  Can you join? Let me know and i'll set up a
call-in number. thx. kd


Looks complete to me.  No comments.

Best,
Jeff

	Paul Kaufman/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/15/2001 11:30 AM

		 To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Utilization of Mike Day

Rick, Jim and Jeff:  Here's a draft of the e-mail I intend to send to Sandy
and Mike re: use of Mike Day in Sacramento.  Let me know your thoughts.

It appears from talking with both of you that we have some confusion on how
we will contract for legal services to support or legislative efforts.
Hopefully this e-mail will clarify the process so there is no confusion in
the future and so that Mike can feel comfortable he is completing work that
is authorized and for which we have a budget.

1.  To begin, it appears that Goodin, MacBride has billings as of May 11 for
approximately $10,000 on direct access, windfall profits, the "Global
Settlement," Power Plant Siting.  We will cover these amounts because of the
apparent confusion with our budgeting and approval process.  The amounts
already incurred should be included in the RCRs discussed below.

2.  As we discussed yesterday, the work associated with the billings in May
was conducted without any RCR approval or any budget in place.  As you know
we terminated the two legislative retainers at the end of April.  No RCRs
were filed to cover the matters on which work was completed in May.

I did receive a budget on legislative matters on May 8.  However, a decision
was made only yesterday to proceed on a specific matter-by-matter basis; the
work in May should not have been undertaken while we considered whether to
proceed with an overall legislative budget or proceed with specific RCRs.  In
short, a proposed budget is not RCR approval.

3.  In the future, any work undertaken by Goodin MacBride should only be
conducted pursuant to an approved RCR.  If an emergency arises--i.e., an
issue arises that could not have been contemplated, then I should be
contacted before completing any work.  If I am unavailable, Jim Steffes
should be contacted.  If Jim is unavailable, then Rick Shapiro should be
contacted.   In this regard, I authorized Goodin MacBride to participate in
the Direct Access coalition meetings taking place today and tomorrow.  I also
authorized Goodin MacBride to participate in a telephonic conference on the
Calderon bill.  To the maximum extent possible, I expect that Mike will
include Leslie Lawner in future Direct Access meetings, legislative drafting
efforts, etc.

4.  If there is any confusion on whether there is RCR approval for a
particular matter, I should be contacted before undertaking an assignment.
If I am unavailable, Jim Steffes should be contacted.  If Jim is unavailable,
then Rick Shapiro should be contacted.  I can be reached through my office
line--503.464.7945, pager--888.916.2262, or cell phone 503.539.4733.  I wear
the pager at all times and respond immediately to messages left on the
pager.

5.  Today, Sandy is filing several RCRs for legislative support on Direct
Access, Siting, Windfalls Profits, and the Global Settlement.  They will be
considered at next Monday's RCR conference call.  If they are approved, Sandy
will manage the Goodin MacBride assignments associated with Direct Access,
Siting, and Windfalls Profits.

Jeff Dasovich will manage all work associated with the Global Settlement,
whether it is legislative or not.  This does not mean that Sandy cannot give
assignments to Goodin MacBride; it simply means that before that work begins
Jeff must approve the work.

This particular issue is a critical matter for our company.  Jeff is involved
in the strategy and business calls concerning this matter and is working on a
daily basis with Jim Steffes, Rick Shapiro and Steve Kean to develop our
position and advocate that position in the settlement discussions.  We must
ensure that our Sacramento efforts are fully coordinated with our strategy
and business interests (as they develop through the settlement
discussions).   To avoid any confusion on the scope of Jeff's responsibility,
I consider all legislation addressing the Edison MOU, any future MOUs with
Sempra, and "Plan B," to be part of the Global Settlement.

Please contact me if you have any questions regarding any of the above.  I
recognize that Sacramento is a difficult environment and that there is
substantial pressure on both of you.  However, we are under an obligation to
use our internal and external resources in the best and most cost-effective
manner.  The RCR process is designed to meet that responsiblity.


Hey there,

Bummer about next weekend, although I'm not even positive I'm going so the frustration may be for naught.  As far as the wedding thing goes, thanks for the offer but I wouldn't worry about it.  I think I have a wedding in Houston that weekend anyway.  I'll talk to Jen about coming up the weekend of the 12th so maybe Jessica, Jen, you, me & my friend Corey could all get together.  I've been needing a good Austin fix.  The trip to San Diego was awesome.  We ended up blowing off most of the plans we made so we could just hang out at the beach, drink wine, and eat cheese and crackers (oh yeah, and watch the sun set).  I did find time to go to a spa and get a bodyscrub/massage which was amazing.  I'm off again this weekend so I have to go through the whole packing routine again tonight..augh!

Hope things are well with you and I'll say high to Lisa and Jen for you tonight.

Sue

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.  From:  "Mary Rebecca Harp" <mharp@austin.apc.slb.com>                           04/19/2001 11:24 AM

Please respond to <mharp@austin.apc.slb.com>
To:	<Susan.M.Scott@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:	Austin

I can't respond to my Hotmail account on this machine.  So...

Bummer...I will be out of town the weekend of the 28th (Jazz Fest) and will
be out Friday on the weekend of the 5th.  I will be flying back that
Saturday and will be going to a wedding with most of those guys.  Do you
want me to find out if a certain one needs a date?  Hmmmm...  It's his boss,
so I don't know how that would fly, but I'll find out.

However, I think that I would really like to be in Austin one of the next
two weekends (5/12 & 5/19) and my plans should not in any way limit yours.
Caycie and Jessica (thru 5/14) will be here and Jen pops over all the time.
And, I know that your sis would love to see you!!  Of course, I would hate
to miss you, but since you are in the jet-set I know that your schedule is
really busy.  How was San Diego?  Or, is that this weekend?

-MR


Attached is the referenced list.  I am responsible for those counterparties
originating from Houston Credit.  Edmund Cooper is responsible for the UK
Credit based counterparties.  I am still resolving issues on about 8-10
counterparties.  If something doesn't make sense, let me know.


Attached, please find the revised credit worksheet.  Please let me know if there are any comments or questions pertaining to credit.

Ed Sacks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shackleton, Sara
Sent:	Monday, October 08, 2001 8:25 AM
To:	Sacks, Edward
Cc:	Heard, Marie
Subject:	Cinergy Gas & Electric Company ("CG&E")

Ed:

I received a message from the lawyer for Cinergy Energy Services requesting that the ENA ISDA be with CG&E.  This will solve our allocation issues (as the utility will hedge for its own account).  Please send a new credit worksheet.  Thanks.  SS

Sara Shackleton
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3801a
Houston, TX  77002
Ph:  (713) 853-5620
Fax: (713) 646-3490