----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 06/01/2001 02:29 PM -----

	exchangeinfo@nymex.com
	06/01/2001 03:07 PM

		 To: tana.jones@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: (01-186) Implementation of Amendments on Use of Letters of Credit...

Notice # 01-186
June 1, 2001

TO:
All NYMEX Division and COMEX Division Clearing Members

FROM:
Neal L. Wolkoff, Executive Vice President

RE:
Implementation of Amendments on Use of Letters of Credit, Certain Securities
and Deliverable Warehouse Receipts as Margin  for NYMEX and COMEX Transactions

DATE:
June 1, 2001
===========================================================

1. Implementation of Rule Amendments. As previously announced in Notice to
Members #01-147 (May 4, 2001), this Notice is to remind NYMEX and COMEX
Clearing Members of rule amendments that become effective today, June 1,
2001, that expand the types of non-cash assets that customers may deposit
with their Clearing Members for margin purposes.

2. Exchange Form for Pass-Through Letters of Credit. Clearing Members are
further advised that a form has been prepared by the Exchange that will serve
as the authorized  uniform form for irrevocable letters of credit for use on
a pass-through basis at the Exchange.  This form may be obtained from the
Exchange,s Clearing Department.

3. Exchange Form for Pass-Through Letters of Credit: Specification of Joint
Beneficiary. The Pass-Through Letter of Credit differs from the Standard
Letter of Credit in that the Pass-Through Letter of Credit provides for Joint
Beneficiaries.  In this regard, a Pass-Through Letter of Credit to be used as
margin on the NYMEX Division should specify NYMEX as one of the Joint
Beneficiaries.  By comparison, a Pass-Through Letter of Credit to be used as
margin on the COMEX Division should specify the COMEX Clearing Association as
one of the Joint Beneficiaries.

4. Restriction on Issuers of Letters of Credit. Please note that, under
applicable NYMEX and COMEX rules, a Clearing Member that is a bank subsidiary
or is an affiliate of a bank may not deposit with the applicable Clearing
House a letter of credit issued or confirmed by such bank, bank parent or
affiliate bank.

As to the actual rule amendments, which are attached below, these rule
changes permit the use of letters of credit, certain securities and
deliverable warehouse receipts by customers to meet their margin
requirements. The rule changes provide for consistent treatment in the use of
such assets for both NYMEX and COMEX Divisions.

Letters of Credit.  As a result of the rule changes, letters of credit (LCs)
now will be allowed for customer margin on both divisions.

Use of Letters of Credit on Pass-Through Basis.  In addition, the rule
changes allow letters of credit to be used on a "pass-through" basis on both
divisions.  In other words, Clearing Members on both divisions will be able
to pledge to the applicable clearinghouse certain LCs posted by customers. It
should be noted that while securities and deliverable warehouse receipts, as
detailed below, may be used by customers for margin purposes, such assets may
not be used on a pass-through basis by a Clearing Member to meet its margin
obligations with the clearinghouse.

Securities. Customers also will be able to deposit with their Clearing
Members certain types of securities as margin. The types of acceptable
securities are the kinds of securities that have been accepted for some time
on the COMEX Division.  Specifically, the rule changes will permit customers
to deposit the following types of securities as margin with Clearing Members
on either division:

securities listed for trading on the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. or the
American Stock Exchange, Inc., or which are traded in the over-the-counter
market approved for margin by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
Board except that such securities must be free from liens and encumbrances;
can represent no more than 5% of the issued and outstanding shares of any one
issuer; and will be valued for purposes of margin at 75% of their market
value.

Deliverable Warehouse Receipts. On both divisions, deliverable warehouse
receipts for any of the commodities traded on the Exchange will be accepted
as customer margin provided that such receipts will be valued as margin at no
more than 75% of the value of the commodity.

If you have any questions concerning this change, please contact Bernard
Purta, Senior Vice President, Regulatory Affairs and Operations, at (212)
299- 2380; Arthur McCoy, Vice President, Financial Surveillance Section,
NYMEX Compliance Department, at (212) 299-2928; or Charles Bebel, Vice
President, Clearing Department, at (212) 299-2130.

AMENDMENTS TO NYMEX RULE 4.01 ("CUSTOMER'S MARGINS"), NYMEX RULE 9.05
("MARGINS") AND TO COMEX CLEARING ASSOCIATION RULE 48 ("DEPOSIT OF SECURITIES
AND LETTERS OF CREDIT AS ORIGINAL MARGIN")

(Asterisks indicate additions; brackets indicate deletions.)

Rule 4.01. CUSTOMER'S MARGINS

(A) Initial margin at least equal to the level set for customers shall be
required of all customers. In no case shall a customer's initial margin be
less than a specified amount per contract, or a specified percentage of the
market value at which any commodity is bought or sold, such customer's margin
to be determined and announced by the Board of Directors or its designee.

 (B) Once the required initial margin has been deposited for each individual
transaction, such trade and such margin shall, for the purposes of this rule,
lose their individual identity and be commingled with all other trades and
margins in the same commodity for the same customer account.

 (C) When the margin (Net Liquidating Value plus Non-Cash Deposits) in a
customer's account declines below the maintenance margin requirement
applicable to the open positions carried in such account, the Member Firm
carrying said account is required to collect (call) from the customer such
funds, which when deposited, will restore it to the then prevailing initial
margin requirement.

 (D) A Member Firm shall not accept orders for new trades on behalf of an
undermargined customer account other than those which reduce its initial
margin requirement unless such Member Firm has been given assurances by said
customer that funds sufficient to restore the account to its then prevailing
initial margin requirement are forthcoming and will be received in a
reasonable amount of time not to exceed one business day for Floor Members
and three business days for all other customers.

(E)(1) A Member Firm may accept deposits from its customers in one or more of
the following forms as margin to cover open NYMEX Division positions:

 (a) United States Currency; or any currency freely convertible to United
States currency; provided that if foreign currency is deposited, its value
shall be calculated so that at the current rate of exchange the U.S. dollar
equivalent of the foreign currency satisfies the customer's margin obligation.

 (b) securities issued by the Department of the Treasury of the United States
maturing within ten (10) years of the date of the deposit and guaranteed as
to principal and interest by the United States Government. Such securities
shall be valued at ninety five percent (95%) of par value.

*(c) securities which are listed for trading on the New York Stock Exchange,
Inc. or the American Stock Exchange, Inc., or which are traded in the
over-the-counter market approved for margin by the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve Board provided that such securities; (i) are free from liens
and encumbrances; (ii) represent no more than 5% of the issued and
outstanding shares of any one issuer; and (iii) are valued at 75% of the
market value thereof;

(d) a letter of credit in favor of a clearing member carrying an account, or
in the case of any letter or credit to be used on a pass-through basis with
the Clearing House a letter of credit in favor of the Exchange.  All letters
of credit shall be issued in such form as may be prescribed by the Exchange
and by a depository which has been approved by the Exchange for issuance and
confirmation of letters of credit drawn in favor of the Clearing Members or
in favor of the Exchange, as applicable.

(e) deliverable warehouse receipts for commodities traded on the Exchange
provided that such receipts will be valued as margin at no more than 75% of
the value of the commodity.*

[(c)] *(f)* The net liquidating value in a customer's account over the
initial margin requirements for the positions carried for such account.

(2) A Member Firm may accept deposits from its customers in one or more of
the following forms as margin to cover open COMEX Division positions:

(a) United States currency, checks payable in United States currency, or
currency freely convertible to United States currency; provided that if
foreign currency is deposited, its value shall be calculated so that at the
current rate of exchange the U.S. dollar equivalent of the foreign currency
satisfies the customer's margin obligations;

(b) the net liquidating value in a customer's account over the initial margin
requirements for the positions carried for such account;

(c) securities issued or guaranteed by the United States, provided that such
securities shall be valued at the lower of the par or market value thereof;

(d) securities which are listed for trading on the New York Stock Exchange,
Inc. or the American Stock Exchange, Inc., or which are traded in the
over-the-counter market approved for margin by the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve Board provided that such securities; (i) are free from liens
and encumbrances; (ii) represent no more than 5% of the issued and
outstanding shares of any one issuer; and (iii) are valued at 75% of the
market value thereof;

(e) *deliverable* warehouse receipts *for commodities traded on the Exchange
provided that such receipts will be valued as margin at no more than 75% of
the value of the commodity*; [provided that such warehouse receipts shall be
valued in accordance with the following:

(i) if the warehouse receipt is for a deliverable grade of the commodity
underlying either the futures contract sold or the futures contract which is
the subject of the call options sold, not more than 90% of the value of the
commodity may be considered as margin; and;

(ii) if the warehouse receipt is for a deliverable grade of the futures
contract purchased or the put options sold, not more than 75% of the value of
the commodity may be considered as margin; and;

(iii) if the warehouse receipt is for either: (A) deliverable grade of a
commodity other than the commodity underlying the futures contract or option
to be margined; or (B) a form of silver or gold not deliverable under a
futures contract, then not more than 75% of the value of the warehouse
receipt may be considered as margin.]

(f) physical commodities (but not forward contracts therefor) if the carrying
member is in possession and control of negotiable documents covering such
commodities, provided, however, that the value of such commodities shall be
based upon the contract market price for the grade of such commodity or if
the commodity is not of a grade deliverable on a contract market, then at the
price for the grade of such commodity on the spot market;

(g) a letter of credit in favor of a clearing member carrying an account*, or
in the case of any letter or credit to be used on a pass-through basis with
the Clearing House a letter of credit in favor of the Exchange.  All letters
of credit shall be* issued in such form as may be prescribed by the Exchange
and by a depository which has been approved by the Exchange for issuance and
confirmation of letters of credit drawn in favor of the Clearing Members *or
in favor of the Exchange, as applicable.*

 (3) Calls issued by Member Firms for additional margin from customers may
only be met by: deposits conforming to the requirements of Rule 4.01(E)(1)
for open NYMEX Division positions, or conforming to the requirements of Rule
4.01(E)(2) for open COMEX Division positions, or, for open positions on
either division of the Exchange, favorable market movements which, when taken
into consideration and combined with any other monies available, enable the
customer's margin to equal or exceed the then prevailing initial margin
requirement.

 (F) Withdrawals of margin from a customer's account may only be permitted by
a Member Firm carrying such account if the remaining funds in such account
are equal to or in excess of the then prevailing initial margin required of
the applicable open positions at the time of said withdrawal request.

(G) The customer's response to a margin call issued by a Member Firm must be
timely and complete. A Member Firm may call, at any time, for margins above
and beyond the minimums required by the Exchange. A Member Firm may liquidate
any or all positions maintained by a customer for failure to meet a margin
call. The customer will be liable for any loss or deficiency resulting
therefrom.

 (H) The margin requirements established by the Board or its designee may
vary for different commodities and may be changed from time to time by the
Board or its designee, and in the discretion of the Board or its designee,
may be made applicable to all open trades as well as new trades.

 (I) Arbitrage

(1) For the purposes of Exchange margin requirements, an arbitrage position
is a purchase or sale of an Exchange futures contract in one delivery month
which futures contract is offset by a futures contract to sell or to purchase
a similar quantity of a related commodity in the same or different delivery
month which offsetting futures contract is executed on or subject to the
rules of a different exchange. In order to qualify as an arbitrage position,
each contract long and short must be carried by the same member firm for the
same account.

(2) The Board of Directors, by resolution, may identify those futures
contracts, that are executable on and/or subject to the rules of a different
exchange, which shall be deemed to qualify as part of an arbitrage position.

(3) The Board of Directors or its designee may set levels of margin for
arbitrage positions at a rate less than applicable to outright positions;
provided, however, that except for interdivision straddles, no such rate
shall be lower than the rates established for clearing members' margins.

Rule 9.05. MARGINS

* * * *
(E) Clearing Members may meet original margin calls by depositing:

(1) Cash (U.S. Currency);

(2) Original Margin Certificates issued by an original margin depository, in
form acceptable to the Clearing House, for delivery to the order of the
Clearing House, representing securities issued by the Department of Treasury
of the United States of America maturing within ten (10) years from the date
of the deposit and guaranteed as to principal and interest by the United
States Government; such securities shall be valued at ninety five percent
(95%) of the par value; or

(3) Subject to a maximum limit of 50% of the Clearing Member's total original
margin obligations, Irrevocable Letters of Credit payable to the order of the
Clearing House *including such Letters of Credit that are deposited with the
Clearing Member in accordance with Exchange procedures by a customer*, in
form acceptable to the Clearing House, issued by or confirmed by an original
margin depository and having an expiration date of not less than three (3) or
more than eighteen (18) months from the date of issuance; provided, however,
that such Letter of Credit may not be used to meet original margin
obligations during the fifteen calendar days prior to the expiration date
thereof (if the fifteenth day prior to the expiration of the Letter of Credit
is not a business day, the period during which such Letter of Credit may not
be used to meet original margin obligations shall begin on the business day
immediately preceding that day); and, provided further, that on the business
d!
ay!
!
 preceding the fifteenth calendar day prior to the expiration of the Letter
of Credit, the Clearing House shall issue a call for original margin to be
deposited in a form and manner acceptable to the Clearing House for positions
held open as of the close of business on that day and margined by the Letter
of Credit. The Clearing House shall have the unqualified right to call on any
Letter of Credit at any time prior to expiration.

CCA Rule 48. DEPOSIT OF SECURITIES AND LETTERS OF CREDIT A ORIGINAL MARGIN

* * * *
(b) Irrevocable Letters of Credit.

(i) The Corporation will accept as original margin for the full face amount
thereof a letter of credit in favor of the Corporation issued by any
institution selected by the depositor *including such Letters of Credit in
favor of the Corporation that are deposited with the Clearing Member in
accordance with Exchange procedures by a customer*, provided that

(A) such  institution has been approved by the Board as an approved
depository or such institution is organized under the laws of the United
States or the laws of any state and the letter of credit issued by such
institution has been confirmed by an approved depository;
(B) that the aggregate amount of letters of credit which may be accepted at
any time from any one approved depository, or for the account of any one
Clearing Member may be limited by the Board from time to time;
(C) that a letter of credit issued on behalf of a Clearing Member by an
institution which is an affiliated firm of such Clearing Member must be
confirmed by an institution which is not an affiliated firm of such Clearing
Member; and
(D) such letter of credit shall be in form and substance approved by the
Board and shall be in such denominations as may be determined by the Board
from time to time; shall be irrevocable, shall be available to be drawn upon
by the Corporation by  a clean sight draft(s) or written demand(s) and shall
run for a period of not less than ninety (90) days from the date of issue.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"
http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=tana.jones@enron.com&refdoc
=(01-186)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


What did she say?

Gabriel Monroy
03/07/2001 09:52 AM
To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Yeap,  Even Alicia knows about us, I think the gossip has crossed group
borders.

Gabriel


FYI, I have a call into Jean.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Miller, Kevin
Sent:	Wednesday, November  28, 2001 4:08 PM
To:	Mrha, Jean; Druzbik, Lisa; Hodge, Jeffrey T.; Sole III, Carlos
Cc:	Sherman, Cris; Melendrez, Jesus; Josey, Scott; Keel, Allan
Subject:	MEGS - Pluto Sale Update (More Bad News!)
Importance:	High

I met this morning with Stephen Noe, the Director handling the potential transaction for Duke Energy Field Services.  The purpose of the meeting was to discuss outstanding due diligence items and attempt to get Duke to raise their non-binding $14.1 MM offer.  However, the first thing Stephen did was offer  an apology.  Duke has found a significant bust in their valuation model.  ( As if we had not already had enough bad news today!) Duke had overstated the depreciation deduction which resulted in a tax credit for the project.  The depreciation schedule was apparently left over from a previous evaluation. In addition, Duke  conducts its evaluation on an after tax basis.  The resulting corrected evaluation with a 10.5% discount factor on an after tax basis yields a minimum value of $11.5 MM with no upside included in the evaluation.

During the meeting, we called Lisa Druzbik and had her run the Enron model an after tax basis using 7 year MACRS for depreciation.  The Enron model confirmed the after tax Duke evaluation.  As you will recall, the guaranteed payments represent the bulk of the value in the deal.   As a side note, I believe that Duke did make an honest mistake and was not trying to re-trade the deal.

Stephen and I discussed upside potential for the project.  Enron ran a case for a hypothetical tieback in 2009 with 10 MMBOE.  Using a 25% discount factor this tieback has a $1.9 MM NPV.  Stephen had run a similar case in his evaluation process.

I informed Stephen that Duke's original $14.1MM offer was on the lower side of Enron's expectation.  Duke will need to include as much upside as possible to get to an offer that Enron could seriously consider.  Stephen  aid that dependent upon the upside included, Duke might could get to the $12.5 to 13.0 MM range.   I told Stephen that I was not sure how Enron would view an offer in that range but do the best he could.

We also discussed the PHA.  Duke may be willing to move forward without seeing the PHA in order to have the option of ratifying it later with Marathon if they so choose.

I will keep everyone informed and I would welcome any comments regarding this proposed transaction.

Thanks  ... Kevin


Suzanne,
Are you handling this for EECC?
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Fischer/HOU/EES on 07/31/2001 01:40 PM ---------------------------
From:	Michelle Leblanc/ENRON@enronXgate on 07/31/2001 01:34 PM
To:	Elizabeth Atkinson/ENRON@enronXgate, Chris Blizard/Enron@EUEnronXgate, Jay Burgess/ENRON@enronXgate, Obed De La Cruz/HOU/EES@EES, Kurt Eggebrecht/ENRON@enronxgate, Joey Esperance/ENRON@enronXgate, Mary Fischer/HOU/EES@EES, Dara M Flinn/HOU/EES@EES, James Ginty/ENRON@enronXgate, Robert Guthrie/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeff Herrold/ENRON@enronXgate, James Hollman/ENRON@enronXgate, "Jones, Michael C." <Michael_C_Jones@pgn.com>@SMTP@enronXgate, Mary Joseph/ENRON@enronXgate, Jennifer Kennedy/ENRON@enronXgate, Harry Kent/ENRON@enronXgate, Glenn Kobes/ENRON@enronXgate, Robyn Larson/ENRON@enronXgate, Karen Laumand/ENRON@enronxgate, Patricia A Lee/HOU/EES@EES, Robbie Lewis/ENRON@enronXgate, Ling Li/ENRON@enronXgate, Essie Locklear/ENRON@enronXgate, James MacCallon/ENRON@enronXgate, Dub Morris/ENRON@enronXgate, "Murray, Jim" <Jim_Murray@pgn.com>@SMTP@enronXgate, Caroline Nugent/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom Rainbow/ENRON@enronXgate, Greek Rice/ENRON@enronXgate, Dixie Riddle/ENRON@enronXgate, Sally Seelig/HOU/EES@EES, Mary Sontag/ENRON@enronXgate, John Swafford/ENRON@enronXgate, Glen Walloch/ENRON@enronXgate, Robert Ward/ENRON@enronXgate, Robert Wilcott/ENRON@enronXgate, David C Williams/ENRON@enronXgate, Danny Wilson/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:
Subject:	RE: 2nd Current Estimate Model

Attached is an updated 2nd Current Estimate Model.  Apparently, the one we received earlier only included the 3rd Quarter numbers.  Please review your models and make the adjustments as necessary.  I would still like to receive all models by the end of the day on Wednesday, August 1.

Thanks,
Michelle

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	LeBlanc, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, July 30, 2001 7:45 AM
To:	Atkinson, Elizabeth; Blizard, Chris; Burgess, Jay; De La Cruz, Obed; Eggebrecht, Kurt; Esperance, Joey; Fischer, Mary; Flinn, Dara; Ginty, James; Guthrie, Robert; Herrold, Jeff; Hollman, James; 'Jones, Michael C.'; Joseph, Mary; Kennedy, Jennifer; Kent IV, Harry; Kobes, Glenn; Larson, Robyn; Laumand, Karen; Lee, Patricia; Lewis, Robbie; Li, Ling; Locklear, Essie; MacCallon, James; Morris, Dub; 'Murray, Jim'; Nugent, Caroline; Rainbow, Tom; Rice, Greek; Riddle, Dixie; Seelig, Sally; Sontag, Mary; Swafford, John; Walloch, Glen; Ward Jr., Robert (Bob); Wilcott, Robert; Williams, David C.; Wilson, Danny
Subject:	RE: 2nd Current Estimate Model

It would help if I attached the model.  Sorry about that.

 << File: Model from Steve 07_27.xls >>

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	LeBlanc, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, July 30, 2001 7:16 AM
To:	Atkinson, Elizabeth; Blizard, Chris; Burgess, Jay; De La Cruz, Obed; Eggebrecht, Kurt; Esperance, Joey; Fischer, Mary; Flinn, Dara; Ginty, James; Guthrie, Robert; Herrold, Jeff; Hollman, James; Jones, Michael C.; Joseph, Mary; Kennedy, Jennifer; Kent IV, Harry; Kobes, Glenn; Larson, Robyn; Laumand, Karen; Lee, Patricia; Lewis, Robbie; Li, Ling; Locklear, Essie; MacCallon, James; Morris, Dub; Murray, Jim; Nugent, Caroline; Rainbow, Tom; Rice, Greek; Riddle, Dixie; Seelig, Sally; Sontag, Mary; Swafford, John; Walloch, Glen; Ward Jr., Robert (Bob); Wilcott, Robert; Williams, David C.; Wilson, Danny
Subject:	2nd Current Estimate Model

Attached is the 2nd current estimate model from corporate financial planning.  They believe the numbers by business unit are materially correct.  (The only exception to this would be the EGF group.)  They have not had the opportunity to thoroughly analyze the numbers, ask questions of the business units, tie out the numbers to actuals, or examine the overall picture.  Therefore, changes are likely to be coming over the next week or so.

In the meantime, please prepare your model and make sure that it ties to the attached model.  I would like to receive all models by the end of the day on Wednesday, August 1.  If you are not able to meet this deadline, please let me know ASAP.  As I receive updated models, I will be sure to forward them to you.

Thanks,
Michelle
3-0931


i am going to sell my car and use the money to get the field.  go- go dancers everywhere.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Blanchard, Timothy
Sent:	Thursday, November 08, 2001 8:57 AM
To:	Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:	RE: Daily Dose

happy at enron (soon to be matt lenhart) field.

From:	Matthew Lenhart/ENRON@enronXgate on 11/08/2001 08:49 AM
To:	Timothy Blanchard/HOU/EES@EES, LSU@ENRON
cc:
Subject:	RE: Daily Dose

daily dose on enron -

we are finished.  i need to now get a job at house of pies b/c that is the only way to pay the bills.  the economy is down and when enron collapses, the energy industry is going to be in a world of hurt.  not to mention the market is going to be flooded with enron folks.  can't go to anymore lsu games unless i get a free ticket.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Blanchard, Timothy
Sent:	Thursday, November 08, 2001 8:36 AM
To:	LSU@ENRON
Subject:	Daily Dose

Since work has gone to hell, I am hoping to find some excitement in the possibility that LSU may play in the Cotton Bowl (if Rohan "Alabama" Davey shows up for
the next 3 games.)  However, do not purchase tickets until it is a done deal - a lesson I learned following the Ark game last season.

http://www.theadvocate.com/sports/story.asp?StoryID=16473
http://www.theadvocate.com/sports/story.asp?StoryID=16475
http://www.nola.com/lsu/t-p/football/index.ssf?/lsustory/lsunotes08.html
http://www.nola.com/lsu/t-p/football/index.ssf?/lsustory/secnotes08.html
http://www.nola.com/lsu/t-p/football/index.ssf?/lsustory/lsufoe08.html


Tricia,

I have completed all the forms you need. Let me know when you have a minute and I will drop them off.

Chris


Okay,  do your magic!


Ben the attached file contains the answers to the questions listed in your
e-mail for Lincoln.

Gus

	Benjamin Rogers@ECT
	10/20/2000 08:30 AM

		 To: Gus Eghneim/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Questions regarding PSD permit for Lincoln

Forgot to include these questions.  Thanks for the call this morning, your
help is very much appreciated.
Ben
---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 10/20/2000
08:29 AM ---------------------------

Don Miller
10/20/2000 08:29 AM
To: Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Questions regarding PSD permit for Lincoln

---------------------- Forwarded by Don Miller/HOU/ECT on 10/20/2000 08:28 AM
---------------------------

mhhurtado@duke-energy.com on 10/18/2000 02:51:20 PM
To: don.miller@enron.com
cc: japearson@duke-energy.com, jparker@mayerbrown.com, jusow@mayerbrown.com
Subject: Questions regarding PSD permit for Lincoln

Don,

As a result of our review of the information and documents on Lincoln we
are requesting additional documents which are not in the data room.

1.   Relating to the plant's PSD:

     The Mostardi & Platt emissions test protocol for the May 2000
     emissions test
      A report to Illlinois EPA containing the emission test data
     Continuous Emission Monitoring (" CEM") Data ( all data
     developed since start-up)
     Any reports to IEPA required under the permit pertaining to
     exceedances, or
     start-up, breakdown & malfunction ( we have internal memos indicating
     that there
     was a breakdown at # 7 on July 5,2000)

2. Also, we don't have any permits for wastewater discharge. We have been
told that there is no wastewater discharged except
sewage/office wastewater which is going to a septic field. But we have no
verification of this at this point.

Thank you for your attention to these items.

Mario H. Hurtado
Duke Energy North America


Thanks for the info.  I'll give it a look.

Kay

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Mitch Robinson                           11/09/2000 06:05 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: SWPC Agreement

Kay -

I've reached a verbal agreement with Westinghouse on the LD issues.  I've
attached a letter outlining the agreement.  Could you review from a legal
standpoint?  Call me with questions.

Thanks,

Mitch


A nice buck on that side of our property limping in the front, hhmmm.......  Jim's deer?????!!!!!!????????

You never know.

----- Original Message -----
From: Erik Wollam
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 9:54 AM
To: knipe3@msn.com; chet_fenner@bmc.com; Joe.Parks@enron.com; brianc@saltgrass.com
Subject: report from Keith

Forwarding Kieth's report from last weekend of doe season.

Had to call him to get information on what made his heart race.

He saw Mertz's rib cage buck at boneyard, other side of the fence, said it
was 14 inches wide with tines that were incredibly long almost touching at
the top. he said 140plus, no problem.

saw brian's deer's younger brother at lonestar and said it will be a great
bucknext year.

While spotlighting bunnys saw a buck at the protien feeder at launching pad
that was unbelivable. He said he counted 12 scorable points, not including
several kickers he did not count. the deer was wide with aobut 8 to 9 inch
tines. walked with a limp on front right leg. Must be a nocturnal old
warrior, never seen before.

other than that he saw a smattering of does and yong bucks. feeders still
running.  e.

>From: "Keith McComb" <kmccomb@austin-mccomb.com>
>Reply-To: <kmccomb@austin-mccomb.com>
>To: "'Erik Wollam'" <erwollam@hotmail.com>
>Subject: RE: how was it?
>Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 08:32:13 -0600
>
>JT has joined the ranks of deer hunters.
>Although we didn't see a spike he shot his first doe at lonestar Sun AM.
>Dropped her dead in her tracks with one shot to the neck with "his" 243.
>We hunted boneyard, lonestar and booger and saw only one spike, a yearling
>with 1" horns, we passed on this one.  We saw several bucks that made my
>heart race, if the weather holds, next season will be a good one.
>Fixed the lights in the trailer and added a plug on the pole next to the
>light switch.
>We should be in good shape for Spring.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Erik Wollam [mailto:erwollam@hotmail.com]
>Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 11:17 AM
>To: kmccomb@austin-mccomb.com
>Subject: how was it?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
>

_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com


One of my colleagues, Jon Cummings (a partner from McKinsey's Johannesburg
office), and his client team from Anglo American would like to visit with
certain individuals at Enron.  They would like to meet with each of you on
a "best practices visit" to the US.  They are trying to understand how
Enron manages corporate center structure and role, performance management,
and people proposition.

Anglo American is the global leader in mining and natural resources.  It
has significant interests in gold, platinum, diamonds, coal, base and
ferrous metals, industrial minerals, and forest products.  The group is
geographically located in Africa, Europe, South and North America, and
Australia.  They will be visiting several companies on this trip including
Johnson & Johnson, BP, and Emerson.

Would you be able to let us schedule an hour with you to meet with Jon
Cummings (Director, McKinsey), along with Philip Baum (COO, South Africa),
David Hathorne (MD, Mondi Europe) and several HR people?

My assistant, Carol Benter, will be in touch with your assistants to try to
schedule this meeting for July 16 or 17.  Please contact Carol Benter
(713/751-4378), or me (713/751-4390) if you have any questions about this
request and thank you for your time and consideration.

+-------------------------------------------------------------+
| This message may contain confidential and/or privileged     |
| information.  If you are not the addressee or authorized to |
| receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy,     |
| disclose or take any action based on this message or any    |
| information herein.  If you have received this message in   |
| error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail |
| and delete this message.  Thank you for your cooperation.   |
+-------------------------------------------------------------+


Attached below is the Credit Worksheet for Astra Power.  The counterparty is
very anxious to have the Master executed, as it would enable them to trade
financially on EOL.  The contact on the worksheet has been my contact thus
far; call her if you need any further company info.  If you have any
questions, give me a call at x6-6002.

Thanks again,

Veronica Espinoza


Bill Rehm
777 W Middlefield Rd 158
Mountain View, CA 94043
wjrehm@yahoo.com

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Bill Rehm


Save up to 70% on your Life Insurance!
Why Spend More Than You Have To?
 Check out these example monthly rates...
10 year level premium term insurance
(15, 20 and 30 year rates also available)
		$250,000		$500,000		$1,000,000
Age	Male	Female	Male	Female	Male	Female
40	11.75	11.53	19.58	18.27	34.80	30.45
45	18.59	16.19	32.81	24.06	59.16	43.75
50	28.66	20.34	51.63	36.31	94.83	67.86
55	43.97	30.19	83.56	56.00	152.25	107.01
60	68.69	44.15	133.00	83.52	252.30	152.85

(smoker rates also available)
 Take a minute and click here  to fill out the simple form and
receive a  FREE quote  comparing the best values from among
hundreds of the nation's top insurance companies! Click Here For All The Great Savings!
To be removed send email
Note:  We strongly oppose the use of SPAM email and do not want anyone who does not wish to receive our mailings to receive them.  As a result, we have retained the services of an independent 3rd party (RemoveYou.com) to administer our list management and remove list.  This is not SPAM.  This email was sent to you because your email is part of a targeted opt-in list.  If you do not wish to receive further mailings, please click below and enter your email at the bottom of the page.  You may then rest-assured that you will never receive another email from us again.  UNSUBSCRIBE ME PLEASE  ID: 022481 asdf@yahoo.com


Rick,
I suggested to Bill that he come in early/mid october.  you could consider coming with him or a few weeks later.  probably after oct board meeting and before Enron Mgmt conference.  I'll have Lisa talk to Karen about dates.
Ted

-----Original Message-----
From: Buy, Rick
Sent: 23 August 2001 00:57
To: Murphy, Ted
Subject: RE: New Starters

Ted- I really need to get over there. I commit to third qtr or early 4th. Rick

-----Original Message-----
From: Murphy, Ted
Sent: Wed 8/22/2001 12:30 PM
To: Amiry, Homan; Aparicio, Silio; Barcelo, Pedro; Barschkis, Andreas; Barthelemy, Cecile; Cini, Pat; Dromgool, Lauren; Edmonds, Lindsay; Fleming, Lloyd; Fuentes, Gabriel; Hardy, David; Harrison, Oliver; Herbelot, Olivier; Herbst, Marcel; Higgins, Diana; Hussey, Jacquie; Jenkins, John (Metals); Kirk, Anna; Levin, Karin; Maley, Paul; Manning, Jolyon; Nelson, Roderick; Patel, Jitendra - RAC Market Risk; Pitt, Michael; Potter, Chris; Ricketts, Teresa; Scutt, Hamish; Sloan, Chris; Stanschus, Christine; Taponen, Minna; Taucher, Lisa; Tumuluri, Ravishankar; Viejou, Claire; Wirya Simunovic, Suryan
Cc: Buy, Rick; Brown, Michael - COO London; Hollis, Kate; Barrett, Liz
Subject: New Starters

At the last RAC Departmental meeting concern was expressed that the vacant positions within RAC were not being filled as quickly as hoped.  I would therefore like to keep you all updated as to where we stand with new joiners.

Recent new recruits include: Rudi Zipter (Director - MRM) who has transferred from Houston, Shane Miller (Senior Specialist - MRM) and Ravi Tumuluri (Associate - U/W) and I would like to welcome them all to RAC.

Looking forward we have several new people coming on board in the next few months and I have outlined their provisional start dates below:

Credit
John Collenette (Snr Director) - 5 November
Mike Mumford (Director) - 3 September
Blair Van Zant (Director) - 1 October
Tracy Ngo (Director) - September
Simon Hockenhull (Snr Specialist) - 2 September
Adam Bauer (Specialist) - 27 August (Sydney office initially)
Shane Forster (Sr.Specialist) - 24 September

Market Risk
Michel Gantois (Director) - December/January
Erik Beekman (Specialist) - 17 September

Underwriting
Christian Pearce (Associate) - 10 September

I realize that, in addition to increasing our capacity,  new starters also require a fair amount of indoctrination/training.   Many members of our team as well as RAC-Houston and much of EEL have put a large amount of time and effort in the selection of these people, all with the consideration of adding people that will fit in and provide some level of unique experience/insight.  We believe that these new starters will provide an excellent complement to our existing skill sets.  Please do your best to welcome these new people, take advantage of their capabilities as well as give them the benefit of your knowledge and experience.  Hopefully these additions will allow us to effect an intellectual capital transfer that benefits us all and makes this a better place to work in all respects.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Ted


Today (Monday) you should receive a packet of preread materials for the offsite September 20-21.  Because a large part of this conference will involve working sessions to discuss objectives and priorities for Global Accounting, we have gathered this material to stimulate ideas and discussion.

On Thursday, you will discuss in breakout groups what you think Global Accounting's top few priorities should be.  You should be prepared to consider the following questions, with the ultimate goal of determining and presenting your group's opinion of what the top priorities should be:

	Who are (or should be) our customers?
	What are their business requirements?
	What do they value?
	How and how well are we providing value to our customers and to Enron?
	What activities should we continue, start, or stop?

If you don't receive your packet of preread materials by the end of the day Monday, please contact me at x36641.


Start Date: 4/18/01; HourAhead hour: 8;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041808.txt


Market Participants:

CONTINGENCY ONLY OPERATING RESERVE AND IMBALANCE ENERGY

On March 12, 2001, the ISO notified Market Participants that the ISO was
proposing to give Market Participants the ability to indicate hourly whether
resources selected to provide Operating Reserves should be dispatched in the
absence of a Contingency or a System Emergency. The purpose of the proposal
is to increase the supply of Operating Reserves bid into the ISO markets and
to facilitate the ISO's ability to preserve Operating Reserves for use
during Contingencies and System Emergencies.

Giving Market Participants the flexibility to designate hourly whether
Operating Reserves can be dispatched in the absence of a Contingency or a
System Emergency requires changes to ISO software as well as changes to the
ISO Tariff. The ISO Board of Governors approved of the proposal and it was
included in Amendment No. 38 to the ISO Tariff filed yesterday at the FERC.

INTERIM OPTION FOR MARKET PARTICIPANTS

Prior to FERC action on Amendment 38, the ISO will continue to use its
discretion to dispatch Operating Reserves to supply Imbalance Energy. See
ISO Tariff o 2.5.22.3. The ISO strives to achieve the highest level of
effectiveness for Operating Reserves dispatched to maintain reliability
within the ISO Control Area. To accomplish this goal, the ISO must consider
the amount of Energy that can be dispatched from awarded Operating Reserves.
In order to assist the ISO in this assessment, the ISO asked Market
Participants to indicate, on an interim basis, whether resources selected to
provide Operating Reserves should be dispatched in the absence of a
Contingency or a System Emergency. If a Market Participant elects to so
designate a resource, it will be asked to provide certain operational
information (e.g., the number of available hours of operation, minimum run
time, minimum down time, etc.).

Market Participants will not be able to make this designation hourly as
proposed in Amendment 38. Rather, if a Market Participant designates that
the dispatch of a resource should be limited to Contingencies or a System
Emergencies, the designation will remain in place until the FERC acts on
Amendment 38. For the interim period, beginning March 20, participants were
requested to submit to the ISO any resource or external import (tie point
and interchange id) that was to be used in response to a system contingency
or emergency only. To the extent any such designated resource or import is
awarded Operating Reserve (OR) (Spin or Non-Spin), the energy associated
with the OR will only be called upon during a contingency or emergency.
These same resources are not precluded from submitting supplemental or
replacement reserve bids. However, only in the event the ISO is utilizing
the contingency-only reserves will supplemental and replacement reserve
associated with a contingency-only resource be called upon. If a Market
Participant wants a resource to be dispatched for Imbalance Energy in the
absence of Contingencies and System Emergencies, it should not designate the
resource.

LONG TERM SOLUTION

The long-term solution (as filed in Amendment 38), will allow for
participants to make hourly elections for contingency only designation. This
election will only be available for Spin and Non-Spin bids. Resources and
imports that are not successful in the OR capacity market (contingency only
or not) will still be able to submit bids for replacement reserve and
supplemental energy. Furthermore, to the extent that a resource has been
awarded OR, is designated as contingency only, and has additional capacity
available, that capacity can be bid into the replacement reserve market or
be submitted as a supplemental energy bid. However, any replacement reserve
or supplemental energy made available to the ISO will be used for Imbalance
Energy and not be reserved for contingency only.

The reporting of specific operational data will also be required for the
long-term solution for any resource awarded contingency only OR.

ADDITIONAL CLARIFICATIONS

Some resources are interested in providing contingency only OR because they
have very limited, not less than 2 hours, energy available behind the
resource. If such a resource is bid in for multiple hours, is dispatched,
and if all of its energy is exhausted, that resource is still responsible
for any OR awarded for future hours..

The ISO expects that resources providing contingency-only OR may schedule
Ancillary Service capacity in the Day Ahead Market for which available
Energy is insufficient to support Dispatch in all hours at the full
scheduled capacity. As required by ASRP 5.3.1 and 5.4.2, at least two hours
of Energy must support any scheduled OR. Therefore, the sum of scheduled OR
should not exceed the available Energy in any two consecutive hours. In the
event that the ISO has dispatched all available Energy, and OR is scheduled
in subsequent hours for which insufficient Energy is available, then the
Scheduling Coordinator should buy back in the Hour Ahead market any capacity
for which there is no available Energy.

If a Scheduling Coordinator fails to buyback scheduled OR capacity for which
no Energy is available, then "No Pay" will apply, and the capacity payment
will be eliminated to the extent that a resource is incapable of delivering
all Energy associated with OR capacity that is dispatched. The ISO will also
monitor performance and consider whether the ISO should use its existing
authority to impose additional penalties to encourage suppliers to bid and
schedule consistent with the availability of Energy. As with any OR, bid or
self provided, the ISO may conduct unannounced tests of contingency-only OR
when no contingency exists. Naturally such tests will be conducted in a
non-discriminatory manner. The ISO may also require each contingency-only
resource to specify the total Energy that is available in relation to
whatever capacity is scheduled in the DA market. This information could be
used in determining buy-back obligations.

If you have questions regarding this interim solution, please contact Brian
Rahman, Manager of Markets at 608-5883.

Byron Woertz
Director, Client Relations


Mr. Skilling,

I wanted to make you aware of the fact that I was leaving NewPower.
My last day at NewPower should be in the week to come.

Foremost, I wanted to thank you for the time you have given me while I was at
Enron and NewPower.
This past year at NewPower has been a very intense and intellectually
lucrative learning experience, which have brought me many skills.
My experience at both companies has been wonderful, fruitful and exciting.

I was glade to see that the NewPower/Enron Employee program faired well.

Best continuation, as President & CEO of Enron Corp and to your family.
Will look forward to the chance of meeting with you again.

Regards,
Wilson Kriegel

I have attach my resume, so you would see the opportunities and experience I
have gained at Enron & NewPower.


Ed,
 We have removed the specific examples of Force Majeure as not being needed
because the revised 11.2 defines force majeure as an event not anticipated as
of the date hereof, which is not within the reasonable control of the party
and which by the exercise of due diligence such party is unable to overcome
or obtain a commercially reasonable substitute performance thereof, all
without listing specific types of events which might be considered.
  You are correct in presuming that force majeure cannot be claimed for
economic purposes which is the reason for the underlined clause in the
preceding sentence.  By example, assuming that more than one transporter
could be used to effectuate deliveries to a particular point, if the
transporter utilized by a party experienced an event of force majeure, the
Enron revision would require a party to continue performance by obtaining
transportation on another transporter, irrespective of the cost.
 I trust that this answers your questions. If not, please feel free to call
me at (713)853-6895.

	Jared Kaiser
	10/24/2000 08:42 AM

		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Amendment 11.2 to the Gisb

Dan,

Ed Fernandez with The Energy Authority replied to our GISB contract with the
following questions.  Could you please address and copy me with your response.

Thanks for your help,

Jared
---------------------- Forwarded by Jared Kaiser/HOU/ECT on 10/24/2000 08:41
AM ---------------------------

"Ed Fernandez" <EFernandez@teainc.org> on 10/23/2000 04:37:09 PM
To: Jared.Kaiser@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Amendment 11.2 to the Gisb

Disregard my question about the arbitration process.    AAA selects 5,
Enron/Tea can strike 2 and then AAA can appoint the one arbitrator.   But
even after that, Enron/TEA can challenge AAA selection.   In short, we have
no problem with Enron's arbitration language.

----- Forwarded by Ed Fernandez/TEA on 10/23/00 05:35 PM -----

                    Ed Fernandez
                                         To:     Jared.Kaiser@enron.com
                    10/23/00             cc:
                    05:07 PM             Subject:     Amendment 11.2 to the
Gisb

Jared,

Our atty suggests we find get clarification on a couple of issues regarding
your amendments:

Special Provision 11.1:  T GISB is already fairly broad in scope "...any
cause not reasonably withing the control of the party claiming
suspension...."  The amendment to 11.2 repeats the same, but removes
specific examples.
1. Why are the specific examples removed?
2. Am I correct in presuming that Enron wants to make it clear that Force
Majuere cannot be claimed for economic purposes?

Special Provision 13.9:  Under the AAA rules, is only one arbitrator
selected from the very beginning, or are a few arbitrators selected
initially, and then each party can pick and choose until eventually there
is only one official arbitrator?   Like a jury selection...sort of.

Thanks,

Ed


The report named: CE P/L <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=4&report_name=CE+P/L&category_cd=3&category_name=CENTRAL&toc_hide=1&sTV1=3&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=10/18/2001>, published as of 10/18/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.

(Revision: 2)


Kim,
 I have reviewed your markup of the redlined contract I forwarded to you last
Wednesday.  Since you confirmed that we were merely putting into place a
three month contract, we should be able to resolve the issues rather
quickly.  If we were working on the Master, I would agree that we are a long
way apart.  Let me respond to the changes you put in your last redline.

 1. Delete the definition of "Credit Support Provider".
 2. Add definition as follows:  The term "Guarantor" means, as to Seller,
Seller's ultimate parent, Enron Corp.
 3. Restore the definition of Material Adverse Change to the language as
provided in my redline to you.  It is the position of our Credit Department
that a rating of BBB- is considered investment grade and as such that is the
benchmark below which a material adverse change would be triggered.  Enron
Corp. is currently rates as BBB.
 4. The changes that you made in 2.1.1, 2.1.2, and 2.2.1 are okay.  The
change that was made to 2.2.2. should be deleted.
 5. The change that was made to 2.3.1 and 2.4.1 is okay.
 6. The changes that were made in 9.1 should be removed because the sale and
purchase quantity is based on the DCQ.   Note that all settlements under the
Contract are based on the DCQ and any variations between actual and DCQ is to
be handled between the party and its transporter.
 7. The change in 9.3 should be changed back to five (5) Days instead of 10
Days.  5 days is the equivalent of 60 days deliveries, changing to 10 would
mean 65 delivery days have elapsed before the Seller can notify Buyer of a
payment default.
 8. The change in 10.2 of "at or" should be restored.  This is a 3 month
deal.  Seller's position is that Buyer is responsible for any taxes at or
after delivery.  Future Taxes are not applicable to a 3 month deal.
 9. All of the changes made to 12.2, 12.3 and 12.5 should be removed.  There
is no partial force majeure, a party is either unable to perform because of
the event or the party can perform.  Please explain how the loss of Buyer's
market could be due to an event of Force Majeure and why the Buyer should not
be required to find a new market during such period.  Force Majeure should
only allow termination if the period extends for more than 180 Days and then
it should only be a triggering event allowing the other party to terminate
and collect a Termination Payment.
 10.   The change in 14 should be deleted.  There is no event which would
allow early termination other than a Triggering Event.
 11. Please explain the changes in 16.4.  Seller has provided all of the
notice address information that will be put in the Contract.  No telephone
number or other address will be added.
 12. All of the changes made to 17.1, 17.2, 17.3 and 17.4 should be deleted
and the original language provided in my previous redline should be
restored.  These are requirements set forth by Enron's credit requirement and
are not subject to negotiation by me.
 13. I have no problem with the changes proposed for 18.1, 18.2, 18.3 nor the
addition of 18.4; however, I do not believe that either party would be able
to locate qualified arbitrators who would agree to the shortened periods.
Please reconsider.
 14. The changes made to the guaranty document appear to be acceptable and I
would forward same to Enron Corp. for their consideration.

 Please review the Contract in light of the matters raised above and let me
have your comments so that we can get this finalized as soon as possible.

	"Kim Decell" <kdecell@gassupplyconsulting.com>
	11/28/2000 01:48 PM

		 To: <Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: WPS contract

Dan-

Attached is a redline document showing our counter to your redline proposal.
The majority of your changes were fine, from my perspective, with minor
tweaking (for example, timelines in arbitration).  The two primary items I
think we will need to discuss are (1) Taxes and (2) the definition of a
Material Adverse Change.  Please see my suggestions and then we can discuss.
As part of this discussion, could you please provide Enron North America
Corp's and Enron Corp's S&P debt ratings?

Please note that any changes we discuss will be subject to the final
approval of Wisconsin Public Service.

Please provide me with an estimated response time (ie, this afternoon,
tomorrow morning), so I can keep WPSC apprised.

Thanks for your help!

Kim Decell

Gas Supply Consulting, Inc.
(281)558-0735
kdecell@gassupplyconsulting.com

 - WPS Enron redline response COMPARE GSC counter.doc


FYI,
I wanted to let you guys know of an OA problem that I am seeing on the
central desk for december 2000.  It appears deals that are gas daily priced
deals are being priced incorrectly in Unify.  Two gas daily publications came
out at the end of the year.  The publication on the 29th was for trans. dated
the 28th and flowing the 29th.  The next gas daily publication  came out on
the 2nd of Jan. and was for trans. 29th flowing the 1st adn 2nd.  We flashed
gas daily prices for the 30th & 31st that equalled the GD publication of the
2nd.  This is correct, we should pay sat. and sunday based on Monday's
price.  Settlements paid the 30th & 31st at the 29th's price.  I am going to
give Bryce a call, I just wanted to share this with you since you should be
seeing OA forms starting today for Dec production.  If you disagree with my
logic, please give me a shout. Thanks.
PL


Attached is the draft that was provided to WFEC's counsel.  As I stated they have requested to depose ECS as well.


yes

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Graham, Carolyn
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 3:08 PM
To:	Neal, Scott
Subject:	FW: WorldCom Calling Card

Pls confirm that you have received your new WCom calling card.   Thank you.

Carolyn Graham
Enron NetWorks LLC
Vendor Management
713-345-8008


<<2XQGRED.DOC>>

Greg and Isabel:

A revised draft of the Escrow Agreement, marked to reflect changes from the
draft previously distributed on April 10, 2001, is attached for review.
Please note that ENA has not reviewed these revisions and reserves the right
to assert additional comments.  Please review and advise of any comments in
order that a draft may be furnished to the escrow agent as soon as possible.
Thank you.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

Enclosure: 137032vR4/3

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - 2XQGRED.DOC


You have received this email because you are listed as a data approver. Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000081999&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000081999
Request Create Date : 1/30/02 4:04:45 PM
Requested For       : joseph.piotrowski@enron.com
Resource Name       : Enpower North America West Production Risk_Mgmt - Risk Information Access
Resource Type       : Applications


Please take a look at there changes to the numbers an let me know.

 Thanks

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Legal
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
Debra.Perlingiere@enron.com
713-853-7658
713-646-3490 Fax


sorry charlie, so how are things

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 1:06 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

do you think that you could have let me in on that little detail?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 1:05 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

i justr thought it might be better for both of us if we didnt talk for a while

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 1:01 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

maryland, virginia...wherever.  so why didn't you talk to me?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 1:00 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

ny was good, you are ready to move where? i didnt not want to talk to you

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 12:58 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

it was fun.  i am ready to move up there.  how was ny?  why did you not want to talk to me?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 12:57 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

ok, so did you have a good trip

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 12:56 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

no why?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 12:56 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

are you being mean

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 12:55 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

whatever.  good.  how about you?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 12:55 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

i just thought that it might be better no not talk for a while, sorry, how were your holidays

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 12:54 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

oh so you are talking to me now?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 12:54 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

so, how are you

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 12:52 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

yes

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 12:22 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:

are you here


Attached is the latest draft of the Transport Option Program filing.

There are a couple of important changes from the last draft.

One is that we're no longer stating that the option fee is going to be
"market-based."  At FERC, the term "market-based" has connotations of having
to prove to FERC that a non-cost-based rate is appropriate because we lack
market power.  While we probably do lack market power, the consensus of the
legal/regulatory team was to try to portray the option fee as a built-in
feature of the transport rate, which is simply being disaggregated into a
separate option fee.  If this theory is not clear to you after you read the
filing letter, let's discuss how it should be improved.

The other significant change (also based on my meeting with legal/regulatory)
is that I've structured the tariff language and the agreement so that every
shipper, regardless of whether they currently use transport on TW, will have
to have a firm transportation agreement when they buy an option.  In other
words, a shipper that does not currently have a service agreement will simply
execute an agreement with a MAXDTQ of zero.  This structure has two
advantages:  1) it's consistent with our option-fee-as-part-of-transport-rate
theory, and 2) it will help support that theory in our next rate case.

I'd like to meet next week, either Wednesday afternoon or Thursday, to
discuss the following topics:

1)  Your comments and questions on this draft,
2)  Some examples of options, to make sure the tariff provisions and contract
work from a logistical standpoint,
3)  The bidding process, and how bids for options will be evaluated, and
4)  Comments received from shippers thus far.

I'll be working on 41 tomorrow; let's talk about what would be a good meeting
time.
I will be out Mon. and Tues.


I said at yesterday's meeting that I would get back to you concerning the
speed issues of the V@R calculations - here's the response...

I spoke with Steve Stock, the Director of RAC systems.  He agreed that there
are performance problems and this is being addressed in a technology review
being conducted by my application architecture group.  There are plans to
re-architect the application so it can handle real time calculations.  Once
the results of the review are known - I will be more than happy to share them
with you.  The V@R process currently takes 11 hours from start to finish.  We
also find this unacceptable!

Also, the front end is very slow in accessing data.  There is a new front end
in development that will address these problems.

I'll keep you posted as new developments occur.

Beth


congratulations ... sorry to see you go.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Brown, Ann A.   On Behalf Of Hunt, Christopher B.
Sent:	Thursday, October 11, 2001 11:03 AM
To:	Ambler, John; Arnell, Doug; Asahan, James; Badger, Dan; Blackwood, Connie; Blaine, Michelle; Boyle, Dan; Brelsford, Loretta; Brownfeld, Gail; Bunnell, Don; Camejo, Teobaldo; Cannell, Kathleen; Castagnola, Daniel; Chen, Tony; Curran, Greg; Despain, Tim; Dodson, Keith; Donahue, Jeff; Dorazio, Anthony; Driscoll, Kimberlee; Duenner, Anthony; Esguerra, Angel; Ewing, Habiba; Gaffud, Miguel; Gallego, Manuel; Gantt, Michael; Garrido, Kim; Gilchrist, Scott; Gonzalez, Orlando; Harris, Clay; Harvey, Claudette; Haug, David; Hickey, Patrick; Hirl, Joseph; Hirsh, Steve; Holly, James; Howe, David; Howes, Carol; Hughes, James A.; Jacoby, Ben; Jernigan, Steve; Ji, Lian; Kean, Steven J.; Kinder, Darrell W.; Kishkill, Joe; Kopper, Michael; Krenz, William; Krimsky, Steven; Kwok, David; Lacroix, Rick; Lee, Jae-Moo; Lobdell, Frank; Lundstrom, Bruce; Mahan, Mariella; Manzano, Rino; Marquez, Roland; Martin, Amanda; Mcconnell, Mike; Mendiola, Wilma; Merrill Jr, John; Miao, Jian; Musch, Susan; Nelson, Bonnie; Norris, Michael; Peterson, Mark; Quilkey, Paul; Rangel, Rafael; Rao, V; Rebhorn, Timothy; Redmond, Brian; Reese, Frances; Russ, Mark; Sayre, Frank; Shaw, Eric; Sherrick, Jeffrey; Sherriff, John; Shields, David; Sikes, Eddie H.; Simpson, Bill; Sloan, Carey; Smida, Ed; Sommers, Jeffrey E.; Sparks, Keith; Taylor, Mitch; Thirsk, Jeremy; Tio, Rick; Villapando, Gemma; Wadlington, Mark; Walls Jr., Rob; Wantschek, Lloyd; Weidler, Peter E; Wissemann, Chris; Williams, Robert C.; Wilson, Frank; Stella Woolley (E-mail); Xiong, Winston; Yao, Anne S.; Yener, Sertac; Repit Suliyono (E-mail)
Subject:	Departure from Enron/Contact Details

As many of you know, next Monday will be my last day at Enron. I will be moving to BP to head their Global Power Group and will be relocating to London. My new e-mail address will be "huntcb@bp.com <mailto:>" and my mailing address will be: D'Arcy House, 146 Queen Victoria, London EC4V 4BY, United Kingdom. I will also be keeping my San Francisco contact information in place as follows: 525 Jersey Street, San Francisco, CA 94114. Phone number (415) 648-6662.
Please feel free to contact me if I can help with any questions or follow-up related to my work while at Enron.
I have enjoyed working with all of you and will miss the daily interactions with such a great group of people. Hopefully our paths will cross in the future. Best of luck to everyone.
Regards,
Chris


ArdorNY.com-Manhattan's Best Value Apartment Rentals.
=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=
WEEKLY UPDATE OF OUR LATEST & NOTEWORTHY APARTMENTS.
As selected by our apartment rental specialists on 07/25/2001
=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=
>>>To rent out or sublet your OWN apartment, please visit http://www.ardorny.com/listwithus/

>>>To subscribe to our FREE weekly updates, please send a blank email to subscribe@ardorny.com  Please, make sure to tell your friends and colleagues about our FREE weekly updates!

>>>To have your email address removed from our email list, please visit http://www.ardorny.com/apartmentsearch/unsubscribe.asp and follow the online instructions.

>>>To comment on the quality of our service or on our agents, please visit http://www.ardorny.com/Comments/

>>>EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY. ArdorNY.com is now hiring apartment rental and listing agents. To find out how to achieve a six figure income during your first year with us, while working flexible hours, please visit http://ardorny.com/hiring or simply call 212-531-5901

STUDIOS :

E85th and York Ave. Brand new sunny studio with a small balcony for $1195. Laundry in the basement. View pictures at   http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=47997

Charming quiet studio on orchard street only $1325.Great location! To view pictures: http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=48779

E88th St./1_Ave. Sunny rent stabilized studio. Available August 1. Rent is $1389.20 http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=49138

West 96. Spacious studio on a P/T doorman bldg. Excellent location. Rent: $1395! Must see! Pictures at: http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=48771

2ndAve/E70 Nice rent stabilized studio, hardwood floors $1400 View pictures at  http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=48486

E76 & 1st; studio in elevator building, private back yard, a steal at $1450 To view pictures: http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=48424

Sullivan St./Spring St. RENT STABILIZED Studio in SOHO. Available right now!! $1534.40 .View pictures at: http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=49053

East 85th studio with private terrace, elevator building, sep kit $1550 Pictures at:  http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=48161

East 83, 2nd Ave, Large studio with lots of light, Sep kit divided with French doors, 2 good closets.$1600. View digital pictures at:  http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=46200

West 71st & Amsterdam Studio in elevator building with EIK for $1595/mo(neg.)!! View pictures at http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=48017

20s/Lexington New Renovations ,Elevator ,nice Lobby, will have wood floors, new appliances,$1650 to view pictures at  http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=48996

Sullivan St./Spring St. RENT STABILIZED Studio in SOHO.WORKING FIRE PLACE. Available immediately.$1995.View pictures at: http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=49054

2nd ave and 84th, 1 bdrm. w / deco fireplace, dining room all new custom kitchen w/ dishwasher, a steal for $2400. view pics at: http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=47611

Sullivan St./Spring St. RENT STABILIZED spacious studio, renovated with separate kitchen. Available NOW!! $2095.View pictures at: http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=46395

East 66 Street. Sunny 465 sf studio in a full service doorman building. $2200. For pictures and more info, please go to:  http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=48872

Spacious terrace studio with rooftop access and amazing views! East 20's available now at $2,495. To see pictures click here: http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=48732

>>>NEW FEATURE!! Need to view 100's of other Studios?? Would you like to receive CUSTOMIZED email of newly listed apartments and PHOTO presentations , based on your particular apartment search criteria?? To do so, visit http://www.ardorny.com/apartmentsearch/register.asp

ONE BEDROOMS:

Nagle Ave Completely renovated, Spacious one bedroom, all new appliances eat-in kitchen, new bath, must see to believe at $1400!View pictures: http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=48880

Allen St/Hester Large, gut renovated 1BR apt. Plenty of light. All new appliances. A steal at $1599 View pictures at  http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=48949

E 85th Street and 3rd Ave. Brand new sunny 1BR for $1600. Laundry in the basement. Steps to express trains. View pictures at  http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=48974

E 85 between 2nd and 3rd. Available Sept 1st. Great one bedroom, wonderful block, steel at $1625. To view pics  http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=48789

53rd and 2nd. RENT STABILIZED! RENT STABILIZED! Big studio convertible 1 bed, walk up one flight, great neighborhood. $1649. View pics at   http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=49088

E90's/2nd Ave. Spacious one bedroom apartment in an elevator building. Available now!! $1650. View pictures at: http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=47715

39s /9th ave. 1 bedroom 1 bath newly renovated close to everything $1700.00 view pictures at http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=47430

East 70th/2nd Huge one bedroom apartment with exposed brick on great Unit has separate kitchen with new bathroom $1750. Pictures at: http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=47267

80's East Furnished 1BR Jewel ! Clean quiet building. Lots of closet space,$1800. View pictures at: http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=24482

96th/Lexington 1 BR w/ Sleeper Loft - walk out door and fall into subway Only $1815! Click here for more info http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=48128

56/10th Furnish Renovated large one bedroom, close to transportation, renting for $1850.To view apartment click here http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=48231

E51st/2nd Ave. One bedroom in elevator building, laundry, sunny bedroom exposed brick, MUST SEE! $1894 view pictures:  http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=48685

E33 Elevator building one bedroom with great space. Full size kitchen & bath available immed. View pictures  at : http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=49042

50/3ave Newly renovated large one bedroom, close to transportation, renting for $1995.To view apartment click here  http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=48382

East village. Newly renovated one bedroom apartment in a completely renovated building. $1995. For pictures and more info., please go to:   http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=47498

W.87th- C.P.W./Columbus Aves. Charming Brownstone 1bd/1bth, Great space, close to everything! Must see for $2000.- Av. 8/1. View pics  http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=48234

E30th St./1Ave. Studio/convertible one bedroom apartment in doorman building. Rent $2000 View pictures at http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=49031

Thompson/Spring Large one bedroom in this hot SOHO location for only $2050.Click here for more info http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=47835

Park row/Great high-rise with doorman, laundry, DSL ready, A/C and totally renovated for $2170.View pictures at  http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=49218

W.25th/9th. Great elevator one bedroom, all new, D/W, eat-in kitchen.$2250. To view pictures click here: http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=47926

East 42nd/2nd, Huge Doorman one Bedroom, $2295! Full Service Luxury Building, Gorgeous! to view pictures:  http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=49028

Sutton Place/59th st. Doorman Alcove studio, ALL NEW! Available immediately. View pictures at: http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=47606

W25/9th ave. One br with elevator, laundry, live-in super, 17' livrm, immaculate. Just $2375/mo. Pictures at: http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=49049

W64TH-CENTRAL PARK WEST..A huge, all brand new 1br incl marble bath & D/W. Subways & Col Circle minutes away. $2400. PETS O.K. View at:  http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=49197

President St./7th Ave in Historic Park Slope Brooklyn. SAFE neighborhood. 12 minutes to Manhattan. WON'T LAST!!! $2500 View Photos: http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=49115

E 80's/Lexington. Elegant Doorman building. 10 Minutes to Grand Central. $2500. To view: http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=47835

West 60's-Central Park West & Columbus. A unique & charming 1 bed with so much character. Has fireplace& exp brick. $2500. View at:  http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=48182

Broadway/69th. Huge 1 BR in White Glove Doorman Building priced low at $2650. To view: http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=48705

20s /1st ave studio doorman building, terrace, dishwasher, A/C $2800.00 view pictures at http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=48141

East 30's doorman large 1 bedroom with BALCONY for $2850! Empire State/River views. To view pictures click here:  http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=48968

Murray Hill 3rd ave and 25th. Luxury doorman, one bedroom, great building, HUGE TERRACE!, 800 sq. ft, $3100. View pictures at at: http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=49043

Charming 1 bedroom with a huge terrace $3195 in the 30's between lex. and 3rd ave. To view pictures: http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=48631

West Village/Grove St. large 1 bedroom apt. with TERRACE in brownstone elev. bldg. for $3425! Gorgeous views! To view pictures:  http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=48901

80s/York large 1bedroom,fp,full kitchen, Great river view from Balcony $3990  http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=47052

>>>NEW FEATURE!! Need to view 100's of other 1-Bedrooms?? Would you like to receive CUSTOMIZED email of newly listed apartments and PHOTO presentations, based on your particular apartment search criteria?? To do so, visit http://www.ardorny.com/apartmentsearch/register.asp

TWO BEDROOMS:

Astoria. 30th Ave and 34th St. Brand new 2BR for $1495. 2 skylites. Lots of closets. Separate kitchen. Pictures at:  http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=48725

Nagle Ave. Roomy two bedroom, completely renovated, eat in kitchen, new bath MUST SEE TO BELIEVE at 1600! View pictures:  http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=48879

39th & 8th; Charming one/two bedroom near everything. Great share, available immediately! $1800 View pictures at:  http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=49018

Carnegie Hill E 96, Cozy two bed, good light & closets, Marble bath. Convenient loc. low rent $1850 View Photos:  http://www.Ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=48788

W79/Broadway. STEAL! JUST LISTED! 12' ceilings throughout and private terrace. 1 minute from the subway. RENOVATED! ONLY $2100! View at:  Http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=49206

East 88th/2nd ave, Big two bedroom, $2100, Great share! All new renovation. View pictures: http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=48193

E25th and 3rd avenue. Good 2 BR with eat-in-kitchen on a high floor!! $2200/mo Pictures at: http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=47983

92nd/2nd 2 Bedroom on 2nd Floor with tons of character and light - Just Renovated Only $2350! Click here for more info  http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=48743

E.92nd/Off 2nd.Ave- Gut Renovated 2bd/1bth, Sunny and Mint; Av. IMMED, REDUCED to $2350!- View pics  http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=48745

w14/8th ave. Large 2br on 3rd floor of brownstone. 17' livrm, large kitchen. 10x10 bdrms. Pictures at: http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=48051

St.Marks Pl. Great 2 bedrooms apt in a great location in the East Village. Avail. 08/01. Rent: $2400. Pictures at:  http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=48908

W70th/Columbus-A STEAL 2 bed w/ gigantic, sunny living room, exposed brick & spacious kitchen. Pets o.k. August 1st. Only $2400. View at:  http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=48587

East 50th/2nd ave, Big two bedroom, $2500, Great share! All new renovation. View pictures: http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=28447

Orchard/Canal St. Loft style 2BR apt. in Chinatown. All new gut renovation, all new appliances. Must see at $2500 View pictures at http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=47728

Mott&Hester Little Italy location with great light ,eat in kitchen is new. Nice size bdrm,big living room for $2500 View pictures at: http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=47240

E.75th- 1st/YK Aves. Generous 2bd/1bth, E-Z CONVERTIBLE 3 share, ONLY $2500! Av.9/1 SIGN NOW! View pics  http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=49132

1st Ave./St.Marks Pl. GORGEOUS two bedroom DUPLEX .Terrace and city views. Available NOW!! $2600.View pictures at: http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=48777

UWS 80's TRIPLEX conv. 2 bedroom apt. with TERRACE for $2600! To view pictures click here: http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=47675

West 90's A fabulous, totally renovated, 2 bedroom in an elevator building. $2600. Pictures at: http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=48116

Yorkville e 90s. Full srv, 24 hr doorman, True 2 bed. Convenient loc. Mod Kitchen & Bath, lots of closets $2925. Photos    http:/www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=48390

E44/2nd Ave. Newly renovated one bedroom, luxury doorman building, great views. Rent $2950. View pictures at: http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=48860

W100/Riverside Dr. Extra Large two-bedroom in a prime upper west side location. All new in/out for $3300.View pictures at  http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=46124

W. 27th/6th Ave. Unique Chelsea 2 Bedroom for $3500 Amazing 1000sf Brownstone - Gourmet Kitchen and Great Light. To view pictures:  http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=47159

Chelsea w20s. New Modern building, over 867sf of light, closets, windows, top line kitchen, marble baths, views & views $ 3600. Photos:  http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=49082

96th/Park Ave AMAZING!! Views from this 2 Bed/2 Bath - can be converted to 3 BR $3750! Click here for more info  http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=48188

Enormous 2 bedroom on upper west side. 90's and Broadway. Unbelievably bright and quiet apartment.24hr doorman. To see pictures click here: http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=46877

80s / WEA 1 bedroom two bath in a super luxury building with all the amenities lots of space many windows $4095 view pictures at  http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=47047

Chelsea 20's. Beautiful luxury doorman building. 2 bedroom apartment with 2 baths. Private terrace. $4445. To view pictures, go to:  http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=49087

60's off Broadway. Magnificent two bed/two bath with spectacular views $4995. To view pictures: http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=48817

East 47 Street. Two bedroom 2.5 bathroom penthouse with 3 terraces. $8000. For more info. and pictures, please go to:  http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=49075

49th/1st. Rare Trump World Tower opening for 2BD/BA with all amenities priced at $8500. To view: http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=49083

>>>NEW FEATURE!! Need to view 100's of other 2-Bedrooms?? Would you like to receive CUSTOMIZED email of newly listed apartments and PHOTO presentations, based on your particular apartment search criteria?? To do so, visit http://www.ardorny.com/apartmentsearch/register.asp

THREE BEDROOMS AND LOFTS

E14/2nd 2br/conv. 3br for just $2300/mo! One of a kind. Large sep. kitchen. Sunlight, new bath, great closets. Pictures at:  http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=48785

Canal St/Broadway Large, open live/work loft in the heart of Chinatown. Only $2700. View pictures at http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=48703

Clinton and Houston. Brand new sunny real 3BR for $2800. Laundry in the basement. 3 blocks away from F train. View pictures at  http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=48973

W136. Renovated 4 bedrooms apt, 2500s.f. 1 1/2 baths. Perfect to SHARE!!! Rent: $2800 (make your offer). Pictures at:  http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=48073

West 105th and Broadway. 3BR for $2900/mo. Elevator building in safe neighborhood. View pictures at  http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=47817

Lexington Ave./28 St. NEW three bedroom Apartment. Available NOW!! $3200. View pictures at: http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=48976

50/3Ave All new true three bedroom great for shares renting for only $3450.Click here to view pictures of the apartment  http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=48054

Christopher st. by Hudson river. Loft 1000 sq ft. 13' high ceilings, marble bath jacuzzi, $4500. To view pics: http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=49044

E87th and 3rd. 3 bedroom/2 bath, all new renovations, $4850. View pictures at:  http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=49059

88th/1st. Brand new 4BR Penthouse with 2 amazing terraces priced at $5500. To view: http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=47225

West 51st and 8th Avenue. Top notch renovated 4 BR/ 2 BATH w/ W/D for $5500/mo. View pictures at http://www.ardorny.com/public/view.asp?id=46666

 >>>NEW FEATURE!! Need to view 100's of other 3-Bedrooms?? Would you like to receive CUSTOMIZED email of newly listed apartments and PHOTO presentations, based on your particular apartment search criteria?? To do so, visit http://www.ardorny.com/apartmentsearch/register.asp

=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=
Information contained herein has been obtained from the owner of the property or from other sources deemed reliable. However, no warranty or guarantee, either express or implied, is made with respect to its accuracy All information is subject to change without notice and/or prior leasing.


Someone I know just put in a bid on priceline for a long weekend in colorado
and got tickets for $185 RT.  If we get enough people together and everyone
is flexible we could use priceline.

-e


Dear Mr. Hayslett,

My name is Gertrude Onuoha, and I am currently a senior at the University of
Houston, graduating with a degree in Finance in December of this year.  I had
the wonderful opportunity to meet you yesterday at the information session
held at the Shamrock Ballroom at the Hilton at University of Houston ground.
I would like to use this medium to let you know that the reception was very
informative, and to thank you for such an excellent presentation.  I would
also like to reiterate my interest in a position with Enron.  Enclosed is
another copy of my resume for your review.

I have also selected Enron at the Univerisity of Houston Career website, and
I would definitely welcome an opportunity for an interview.

Thanks once again, and have a great day.

Sincerely,
Gertrude Onuoha
713-776-8919


If we accept, then yes our IPE shares get converted to ICE shares.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/11/2000
12:37 PM ---------------------------

Crystal Barry <CBARRY@IIRLTD.CO.UK> on 02/09/2000 05:05:17 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: The Real Options Conference

Dear Vince,

As the above event is drawing closer, I thought I would write a quick email
to finalise a few things with you.  I understand that you would like a guest
to attend, please can you let me know their name and job title.  Also, if you
could send me your conference checklist I would appreciate it, so that I can
finalise details with my audio visual company.

In the meantime, if there is anything I can do for you, please do not
hesitate to let me know on 0171-915-5116.

Kind Regards
Crystal


Please disregard the page sent earlier today.  Thanks.

Aaron P. Roffwarg
Bracewell & Patterson, LLP
South Tower Pennzoil Place
711 Louisiana St.
Houston, Texas 77002
(713) 221-1117 (Ph)
(713) 221-2184 (Fax)

CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT:
This information is intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is
privileged, confidential, and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any dissemination of this information is strictly prohibited.  If
you have received this information in error, please notify us
immediately by telephone at (713) 221-1117 or by fax at (713) 221-2184,
and confirm that you have destroyed this information and any copies.
Thank you.

 - spa.pdf


Ding, ding, ding...!  You're ready for Who Wants to be a Millionaire!


David Fairley and I met with Marvin Carraway and Bob Priest (MDEA) on
Monday.  The Letter of Intent is fully executed and contract
developmetn/negotiations are in full swing.  Marvin and Bob are very anxious
to get a contract executed and have everything ready for the May 1, 2001
start date.

Internally, we are charging down several paths at once in order to meet the
contracting timeline and the May 1 deadline.  Please review and
comment--there is a lot of stuff here--, and let me know what your respective
schedules are.

Contract development/negotiations (Kay Mann is the lead on the contract,
David F and Reagan are leads on negotiations)
? MDEA would like to have contract signed by April 10
? MDEA is contracting party backstopped by Clarksdale and Yazoo City
? Enron to act as agent in market transactions
? MDEA and Enron to form Marketing Comittee to develop strategy
? MDEA to authorize several people to approve Enron transaction
recommendations

Action Items
? development of profit calcuation (David Fairley)
? develop "agency relationship" language (Kay)
? does MS law prevent Enron from buying and selling for MDEA? (Kay)
? Who ownes the assets? (Reagan)
? Does MDEA have any enabling agreements on file? (Reagan)

Fuel Procurement (Jim Homco is the lead)
? gas/oil pruchasing
? gas/oil scheduling

Action Items
? establish proceudres and relationships

Settlement (Edith Cross is the lead)
? internal meetings held last week to discuss structure

Action Items
? define structure

Technical infrastructure development (Lloyd Will and Rick Broussard are the
lead)
? Frame relay circuit between Clarksdale and Yazoo City inclusive of routers
and servers
? Frame relay between Houston and Clarksdale inclusive of routers and servers
? monitoring software
? Enron metering
? e-Tag entity
? metering
? scheduling

Action Items
? get everything in place (Rick Broussard)

Ancilliary services and generator imbalance issues (Kieth Comeaux is the
lead)
? we met with Entergy and will take ancilliaries via Entergy's tariff
? Entergy is willing to discuss dynamic scheduling
? Entergy will telemeter the hourly data once a month to calculate imbalance

Action Items
? reference anciliaries in the contract
? get with Entergy (Matt Wolf) to coordinate
? map out generator imbalance schedule

Interconnect operating agreement (Christi Nicolay is the lead)
? MDEA and Entergy both filed the IOA unexecuted and requested expedited
action by FERC
? non-firm point-to-point blanket agreement executed and filed
? short-term firm point-to-point blanket agreement executed and filed
? Network service transmission agreement filed
? contract firm off-system power (26 MW) listed as network resource
? Clarksdale and Yazoo City generation assets listed as network resources (95
MW)

Action Items:
? Keep in touch with Marvin and help as possible
? ensure that absent an executed IOA the network transmission is available

Scheduling (Cory Bentley is the lead)
? load forecasting
? schedule contract resources

Action Items
? make sure that MDEA is a recognized source/sink with entergy (Reagan)


You are cracking me up. Basically you are the only thing keeping me awake today..


SCE says costs exceeded cash in from May to Aug also some blah, blah, blah on
federal energy policy.  Can we get in on Southern's IPO?

Phyllis, we should check on a site license for Enron (see first column).
I'll call Houston on it.
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/SFO/EES on 09/27/2000 08:40
AM ---------------------------

US Publishing <season@restructuringtoday.com> on 09/27/2000 09:16:50 AM
Please respond to season@restructuringtoday.com
To: "RT Reader" <season@restructuringtoday.com>
cc:
Subject: Restructuring Today, Wednesday September 27, 2000

(see attached file:  rt000927.pdf)

Thank you,

Season Hawksley
US Publishing
1-800-486-8201
season@restructuringtoday.com
www.restructuringtoday.com

 - rt000927.pdf


Lipp:

This e-mail will confirm the site visit by your company at Gleason and
Wheatland.  The relevant information is as follows:

Pursuant to the Site Visit Procedures sent you by CSFB, if you have not
already done so, please send me the following:
List of your team members and titles
For outside consultants, state their employer
Name, phone number (office and mobile) and e-mail address of your designated
deal team leader

Lastly, I will serve as the due diligence coordinator for Gleason and
Wheatland, handling all questions and responses.  Should you have any due
diligence questions or require copies of any oversized documents, please
contact me at 713.853.7998.

Regards,
Ben


We will have a group class on OA tomorrow around 9:00 am in EB3268.  THis is
an effort to get you guys up to speed on OA so you can review forms and I can
take 3 hour lunches.  See you there.
PL


I think you'll find there isn't that much to a site sale.  Witness
Plano/Pontiac as compared to the Peakers.

	From:  Kathleen Carnahan                           03/08/2001 02:42 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Carlos Sole/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: Midway

And this mean's ole Kathleen is going to be busting her ass!

K-
---------------------- Forwarded by Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron on 03/08/2001
02:41 PM ---------------------------
From: Ann Elizabeth White@ECT on 03/08/2001 02:30 PM
To: Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Midway

Help me out here - what does he mean by "go live"?

	Kathleen Carnahan@ENRON
	03/08/2001 02:05 PM

		 To: Ann Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Midway

Hot off the press.

Kathleen
---------------------- Forwarded by Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron on 03/08/2001
02:05 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Ben F Jacoby @ ECT                           03/08/2001 01:55 PM

Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Greg Krause/Corp/Enron@Enron, Raimund Grube/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathleen
Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron, Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Midway

Folks:

Please note in my e-mail below that we need to go live with this by April 2.
This means that we all need to work together to make this happen. I would
like to see a comprehensive index of all documents we intend to include ASAP.
This list should include site plans and other drawings that we've spent a lot
of money on.

I look forward to reviewing this list.

Regards,

Ben
---------------------- Forwarded by Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT on 03/08/2001 01:43 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Ben F Jacoby                           03/08/2001 01:42 PM

Sent by: Ben Jacoby
To: Suresh Raghavan/Enron@EnronXGate
cc: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Midway

Suresh:

This e-mail is to confirm that we will use DealBench for the marketing of our
Midway, FL site. Kathleen Carnahan and Fred Mitro will be the individuals on
my team responsible for coordinating the effort of collecting and organizing
documents to be placed on line. We need to go live with this by Monday, April
2. We would appreciate your help in making this happen.

Our cost center number for the $10,000 charge is 107319. Please let me know
if you have any questions.

Thanks,

Ben