David,

FYI

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/19/2001
11:31 AM ---------------------------

vkamins@enron.com@ms1.lga2.nytimes.com on 03/19/2001 09:35:38 AM
Please respond to vkamins@enron.com
Sent by: articles-email@ms1.lga2.nytimes.com
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: NYTimes.com Article: Companies Turn to Grades, and Employees Go to
Court

This article from NYTimes.com
has been sent to you by vkamins@enron.com.

Jeff,

FYI,

Vince

/-------------------- advertisement -----------------------\

Let NYTimes.com Come to You

Sign up for one of our weekly e-mails
and the news will come directly to you.
YOUR MONEY brings you a wealth of analysis
and information about personal investing.
CIRCUITS plugs you into the latest on
personal technology. TRAVEL DISPATCH offers
you a jump on special travel deals and news.

http://email.nytimes.com/email/email.jsp?eta5

\----------------------------------------------------------/

Companies Turn to Grades, and Employees Go to Court

By REED ABELSON

An increasingly popular technique for evaluating employees is
prompting lawsuits charging discrimination at three big companies.

 At issue is the ranking of managers, professionals and sometimes
lower-level employees from best to worst, or grading them on a bell
curve, and then using that ranking to help determine pay and
sometimes whether to fire someone.

 In their suits, all filed over the last year or so, employees at
Microsoft, Ford Motor and Conoco say the rating systems are unfair
because they favor some groups of employees over others: white
males over blacks and women, younger managers over older ones and
foreign citizens over Americans.

 A growing number of companies are turning to grading systems, also
known as forced rankings or distributions, as a way of making sure
managers evaluate employees honestly and make clearer distinctions
among them. At companies that do not compare employees with one
another this way, nearly every employee can come away feeling above
average, like the children of Lake Wobegon. But under the grading
system, managers are forced to identify some people as low
performers.

 At General Electric, for example, supervisors identify the top 20
percent and bottom 10 percent of their managerial and professional
employees every year. The bottom 10 percent are not likely to stay.

 As John F. Welch Jr., General Electric's chief executive, wrote
last month to shareholders, "A company that bets its future on its
people must remove that lower 10 percent, and keep removing it
every year * always raising the bar of performance and increasing
the quality of its leadership."

 Ranking or grading employees is also common at technology
companies like Cisco Systems and Hewlett- Packard. But recently the
concept has been catching on more broadly, according to management
consultants. One reason is that as the economy slows, companies
often lay off employees. Cisco, for example, announced earlier this
month that it would let go as many as 5,000 workers * and would use
grading as one way to identify people to lay off.

 "Companies are playing their version of `Survivor,' " said David
Thomas, a professor at the Harvard Business School.

 Another reason is that some companies are eager to copy Mr. Welch,
long viewed as one of the most successful managers in America.

 Defenders of these systems say anyone who gets a low grade is
likely to view the process as unfair. " `A' students love grades;
`F' students hate grades," said John Sullivan, a human resources
professor at San Francisco State University.

 But the techniques, which some employees label with terms like
"rank and yank," have come under sharp criticism. While they appear
to offer an objective way to judge employees, they can be
vulnerable to bias, Mr. Thomas said. Managers may stereotype
employees when evaluating them on vague criteria like career
potential * deciding that older workers, for example, may have a
harder time keeping up with new technology.

 In some cases managers can view these systems "as a tool to be
used to weed out the ones you don't want," said Thomas S. McLeod, a
lawyer in Canton, Mich., who represents employees suing Ford in
another case.

 Critics of the system also argue that companies should not apply a
bell curve, in which a small number of employees get the highest
and lowest rankings and a much larger number are grouped in the
middle. The bell curve model assumes a normal distribution among a
very large group of random individuals, not small groups.

 What is more, across a company, people who belong to a
particularly talented unit will suffer if a certain number of them
must be given poorer grades than they would get in another unit.

 "You end up with dysfunctional results," said Edward E. Lawler
III, a business professor at the University of Southern California.

 Some lawsuits contend that Microsoft's grading systems are
discriminatory. One, filed last October, seeks class-action status
on behalf of blacks and women. The suit states that the rating
system "permits managers, who are predominantly white males, to
rate employees based upon their own biases rather than based upon
merit."

 According to the lawsuit, employees are rated on a five-point
scale, with only a certain percentage permitted to receive each
score. Employees doing the same job in the same unit are also given
a "stack ranking," from most to least valuable. Managers decide
those rankings largely using what are called "lifeboat
discussions," where they choose which employees they would want
with them if stuck in a lifeboat. Managers had no other clear
criteria, according to Christine Webber, a lawyer at Cohen,
Milstein, Hausfeld & Toll who is representing the employees.

 Grading is highly subjective at Microsoft, according to Peter M.
Browne, a former executive who is also suing the company, charging
discrimination. Mr. Browne, who is black, said managers were forced
to use a curve in evaluating even small groups. He said he had to
rate a group of five on a curve, for example, in deciding which
ones would not receive stock options.

 "You weren't told anything * just meet the curve," Mr. Browne
said.

 He says managers ended up favoring people with whom they
socialized. "People gravitate to people who are like them, and the
system just forces that," he said.

 Microsoft defends its system as fair and helpful. "We want to give
the highest compensation to the very top performers," said Deborah
Willingham, senior vice president for human resources, adding that
the system included checks and balances to ensure fair treatment.
Employees can appeal their ratings, for example, and are largely
responsible for developing the criteria by which they are
evaluated.

 Ms. Willingham also said the company did not ask its managers to
give a fixed percentage of their employees any given score. "We
don't force that curve to look any certain way," she said.

 Microsoft has no formal "stack rank" policy, she said. And when
managers do have lifeboat discussions, they are a tool to consider
which employees they would want to keep if they were starting
again.

 While the company would not comment on the lawsuits, Microsoft
"expressly prohibits discrimination," Ms. Willingham said.

 Similar criticisms emerged in a lawsuit brought last month against
Ford. It argues that the company's new grading system discriminates
against older workers. The company, which adopted what it calls its
performance management process a year ago, gives its 18,000
managers A, B or C grades. Last year, the company awarded 10
percent an A, 80 percent a B and 10 percent a C.

 Ford also faces a second lawsuit asserting that it unfairly
discriminated against older white males in its grading.It would not
comment on the litigation but defended its use of grades. "We
believe the system is fair and nondiscriminatory," a company
spokeswoman said. "We are in a very competitive industry, and we
need all of our employees to be the best they can be."

 At Conoco, employees contend that the company discriminated
against United States citizens and older workers when it laid off a
dozen geophysicists and other scientists in 1999 based on a ranking
from one to four, according to a lawsuit filed last year. The
majority of those let go were Americans, according to the suit, as
opposed to British, Norwegian and Canadian professionals.

 "The rating system was selectively enforced, and there were
instances of manipulation," said John Zavitsanos, the lawyer
representing the workers. Even though some were given higher
ratings on earlier rankings, they were eventually given the lowest
possible rating of four.

 Conoco, based in Houston, has extensive operations in the North
Sea, and many of the senior managers at the division in question
are British, according to Mr. Zavitsanos.

 While Conoco said it could not comment on the litigation, it said
its evaluations were based on several factors, including
performance, skills and expertise. The company said ratings often
changed as more information was collected and people were evaluated
in larger groups. Conoco company also denied that decisions were
based on anything other than individual capabilities.

 Companies "do need something in making pay decisions, downsizing
decisions," said Jim Kochanski, a consultant with Nextera
Enterprises. The problem is that companies may not take enough care
in deciding how people should be ranked. "They can get it very
wrong," he said.

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/03/19/business/19GRAD.html?ex=986016138&ei=1&en=e2
02a0228246c717

/-----------------------------------------------------------------\

Visit NYTimes.com for complete access to the
most authoritative news coverage on the Web,
updated throughout the day.

Become a member today! It's free!

http://www.nytimes.com?eta

\-----------------------------------------------------------------/

HOW TO ADVERTISE
---------------------------------
For information on advertising in e-mail newsletters
or other creative advertising opportunities with The
New York Times on the Web, please contact Alyson
Racer at alyson@nytimes.com or visit our online media
kit at http://www.nytimes.com/adinfo

For general information about NYTimes.com, write to
help@nytimes.com.

Copyright 2001 The New York Times Company


$0 bid for skip hicks


Hey Guys,

A bunch of my college friends and my roommate Katie's Addidas friends are going to the Beaver's game tomorrow (Thursday) evening if you are interested.  Thirsty Thursday menas $1 Beers--hard to pass up!  Please let anybody else know too!

Kourtney

Heather, please be sure to let your roommates know too!

-----Original Message-----
From: Sullivan, Katie [mailto:Katie.Sullivan@adidasus.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 2:17 PM
To: Linde, Anne; Miller, Melissa; Meredith, Jaime; Divers, Amelia;
Quinn, Ryan; Humphrey, Jim; Gavin, Ed; 'tbishop@ix.netcom.com';
Stauffer, Morgan; Wallrich, Kelly; 'Magnuson, Stacia
[smagnuson@ca.webergroup.com]'; Stacia[smagnuson@ca.webergroup.com];
Stainbrook, John; Leistritz, Kele; 'Phillip Long [plong@up.edu]';
Nelson, Kourtney; 'bshrum@hotmail.com'; 'Scott.West@idc-ch2m.com';
'eavakian@advanced-surfaces.com'; 'ktbanker@hotmail.com';
'beauiwersen@yahoo.com'; 'clindsay@advanced-surfaces.com';
'cmcbride@up.edu'; 'bschultz@up.edu'; 'SWarjone@imark-com.com'
Subject: baseball at PGE park
Importance: Low
Sensitivity: Personal

> it's baseball* time
>
I know this is short notice but. . .the Beavers play the New Orleans Zephyrs
(what is a zephyr?)  tomorrow at 6:30 AND it's *dollar beer night.

> Since we all have different schedules, let's plan to see one another in
> section 121 ($3-$6 seats).   If you are interested in going but haven't
> been, or have any questions, please give me a call.
>
> Hope to see you there!
katie
> 503.493.9785
>
>
> p.s.There are work friends and family members on this list, so please
> don't reply to all,  thx :-)
>
> p.p.s.   Brea is back in town from Boise one last weekend before she heads
> out to Omaha for the next 4 years. . . yet another plus to catching the
> game.
>
AND FINALLY. ..Clayton, will you kindly pass this on to Kirsten and Ryan?
Scott, please feel free to pass this on to your hoards of email lists as you
wish.   let's pack the stands damnit.


Thanks, we are in bounds for the moment.  Rick


Any interest? Rick
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lemmons Jr., Billy
Sent:	Wednesday, August 01, 2001 2:14 PM
To:	Allen, Phillip K.; Angelos, Megan; Armstrong, Julie; Arteaga, Airam; Blachman, Jeremy; Blackwood, Connie; Bob, Vanessa; Bolen, Vivianna; Bowen Jr., Raymond; Brelsford, Loretta; Brown, Carol Ann; Burns, Jennifer; Buy, Rick; Campos, Kathy; Causey, Richard; Chapman, Kay; Cline, Wade; Dauterive, Inez; Davidson, Binky; Daw, Nicki; Deffner, Joseph; Delainey, David; Derrick Jr., James; Dick, Sharon; Dietrich, Janet; Donahue, Jeff; Dorsey, Billy; Elliott, Steven M.; Fastow, Andrew; Ferrari, Kerry; Fisher, Dolores; Fleming, Rosalee; Ford, Sue; Frevert, Mark; Gadade, Mrudula; Garland, Kevin; Glisan, Ben; Grow, Christina; Hannon, Kevin; Harris, Stephanie J; Hawkins, Linda; Hayslett, Rod; Heathman, Karen K.; Hillis, Kimberly; Hinojosa, Esmeralda; Hughes, James A.; Kaminski, Vince J; Kean, Steven J.; Kelsey, Jo; Kitchen, Louise; Koenig, Mark; Kopper, Michael; Lavorato, John; Lay, Kenneth; Leff, Dan; Maronge, Bridget; Marshall, Lucy; McCarty, Danny; Mcconnell, Mike; McCurley, Peggy; McDonald, Rebecca; McMahon, Jeffrey; McMahon, Kathy; McVicker, Maureen; Metts, Mark; Moffett, Carol; Muller, Mark; Murray, Julia; Olson, Cindy; Paxton, Jana L.; Phillips, Cathy; Piper, Greg; Rangel, Ina; Rice, Ken; 'Leah.Rijo@ENRON.com'; Rushing, Rebekah; Saltiel, Robert; Schiller, Marsha; Schoppe, Tammie; Scrimshaw, Matthew; Sera, Sherri; Shankman, Jeffrey A.; Shelby, Rex; Sherrick, Jeffrey; Sherriff, John; Shively, Hunter S.; Skilling, Jeff; Spiller, Tina; Stark, Cindy; Sunde, Marty; Taylor, Liz M.; Taylor, Mitch; Tilney, Elizabeth; Urquhart, Lauren; Wells, Tori L.; Westbrook, Sharron; Whalley, Greg; White, Leesa; Williamson, Joannie; Paige, Barbara; Saunders, Sherri; Steffes, James D.; Cox, David; Dimichele, Rich; Fallon, Jim; Adams, Jennifer; Horton, Stanley; Muench, Gayle; Rieker, Paula
Subject:	Full-Time Associate Orientation - Happy Hour

On Monday August 6, about 75 new full-time Associates will be starting their careers at Enron.  Attached is a schedule of Orientation Topics, as well as an invitation to welcome these Associates at a Happy Hour Monday evening.  It would be great if you could stop by, even for just a few minutes, to welcome them to the company.  For your convenience, the Happy Hour is at Farrago, which is less than 6 blocks from the Enron Building.

Members of the Program regularly tell us that senior level interaction is an area that we can improve on, so your participation in events like this very important.  An RSVP is not required, but if you plan to attend, please let us know so we can prepare a name tag for you.  Feel free to extend this invitation to other senior members of your team.

As always, we appreciate your continued support of The Program.

Regards,
Billy

Distribution:
Executive Committee
Policy Committee
A&A Committee (Western only)
Recruiting Executive Leads


Kyle Anthony Barroso

                          January 16,2002
                            6lbs. 15oz.
                          18.5 inches long

 - MVC-001S.JPG


Dawne,

The options should go to NG-PR-OPT, but the underlying swap should continue
be between NG-Price and NG-Exotic.

Thanks,

Errol

Dawn C Kenne@ECT
02/26/2001 11:50 AM
To: Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Torrey Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tara Sweitzer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C
Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Mike Maggi Options

With this new book, you want the option to go to NG-PR-OPT (it is going to
NG-PRICE now) and the underlying swap to be between NG-PRICE and NG-PR-OPT?

Please confirm!

Dawn

---------------------- Forwarded by Dawn C Kenne/HOU/ECT on 02/26/2001 11:48
AM ---------------------------

Tara Sweitzer
02/26/2001 09:28 AM
To: Dawn C Kenne/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Mike Maggi Options

---------------------- Forwarded by Tara Sweitzer/HOU/ECT on 02/26/2001 07:39
AM ---------------------------

Errol McLaughlin@ENRON
02/26/2001 09:23 AM
To: tara.sweitzer@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Mike Maggi Options

Sorry, I should have copied you on this.

Errol
---------------------- Forwarded by Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron on 02/26/2001
09:17 AM ---------------------------

Errol McLaughlin
02/26/2001 09:19 AM
To: dawne.c.kenne@enron.com, torrey.moorer@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Mike Maggi Options

Dawne,

Starting tommorrow, Mike's options need to be booked to NG-PR-OPT.  The deals
that are done online today will be manually switched to the new book by us.

Thanks,

Errol McLaughlin


Looks like we are getting another $5,000.00 from the asbestos settlement.  Maybe I should just keep this to myself.  I'm so poor and I need so much.

Don, why don't I mail this other ag exemption to you and you can fill it out just like the first one you sent in?  What mailing address should I use?

I'm going to the doctor this afternoon for my allergies.  I hate getting old.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Peter Sherk <Peter.Sherk@morganstanley.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Peter+20Sherk+20+3CPeter+2ESherk+40morganstanley+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Friday, August 24, 2001 11:15 AM
To:	Lambie, Chris
Subject:	Sung to American Pie

Sung to American Pie

A long, long time ago.... I can still remember, how that stock price
used
to
make me smile, and I knew if I had my chance, I shouldn't have listened
to
those analysts rants, and maybe I'd be happy for a while..... but
February
made me shiver, with every option they delivered, bad news in the
Boardroom,
I couldn't believe the pending doom, I can't remember if I cried when I
read
about Skilling step aside but something nauseated  me from deep inside,
the
day, that Enron shareholders, cried. So...
CHORUS
Why, why did they throw a pie in his eye? Mortgaged the company to the
sky
then the bond market went dry and them good ol' boys were high on their
own
supply wailing, "Why Ask Why",  This will be the day that they  drink
Bud
Dry.
Did you write off your shares enough or did you have faith in Jeff
above,
if
the headlines told you so, and do you believe in book-it-n'-roll, can
mark
to market save your p&l and can you teach me how to print money on deal
flow? Well I know that you're in not in ruin I saw your balance in the
credit union, you sold off all your shares and I dig those market bears.
He
was a lonely boomer CEO with a big old House in River O.  but I knew I
was
out some dough, the day, Jeff stepped aside. I started singin...
Chorus

Now for ten years we've been on a roll and all are friends are on the
dole
but that's not how it used to be, when the Ken Lay sang for the George
and
Barb while Rice screwed Amanda in an rental from Harold Farb,  oh and
while
Skilling was looking down, the stock price has made him frown the
shareholder return, has really made him burn, and while he had plenty of
jack, he had lost the knack and had come under attack, , the day, Jeff
stepped aside. We were singin...
Chorus
Helter Skelter in a summer swelter the electricity market was a limit
melter, eight hundred bucks and climbing fast, California credit limit
had
quickly past, the governor tried to get some bills past,  Enron's
receivables have quickly amass, now everyone ran to  in Washington, the
lawsuits have just begun, just before the price would fall, Gov. Gray
bought
it all, as the dust is settling, will prove that government mettling
will
certainly be, a huge catastrophe, the day, Jeff stepped, aside. We
started
singin...
Chorus
Oh and there we were all in one place, a company that needed its space
with
no floors left to grow, so come on, Jeff be nimble, Jeff be quick, Jeff
S.
built a new deodorant stick because hubris the devils only friend, oh
and
as
I watched that tower build, but I doubt it will ever be filled, no more
recruiting trip; as HR doles out more pink slips; and as the building
climbed high into the sky to quite the contractor delight  I saw
shareholders shuttering with fright, the day, Jeff stepped aside. He was
singin...
Chorus
The burning question that I don't know is who can replace him as CEO
cause
the company won't be the same, he transformed the industry his success
is
plain to see but from natural gas to electricity, Dynegy tried, and
Duke
has dreamed but I hate to tease, they are just Enron wanna-be's, and in
hindsight its easy to mock his leaving the firm in a shock, I'm just I
had
sold my stock, the day, Jeff stepped aside, and they were singin...
Why, why did they throw a pie in his eye? Mortgaged the company to the
sky
then the bond market went dry and them good ol' boys were high on their
own
supply wailing, "Why Ask Why",  This will be the day that they  drink
Bud
Dry.


absolutely...though i'm not sure how you do it.  call chris gaskill and he
should be abl to help.

From: Kevin McGowan/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/04/2001 09:33 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

John,

Could I get access to the gas message board?

KJM


I really like that one.

	From:  Ben F Jacoby @ ECT                           03/18/2001 10:20 AM

Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron, Chris Booth/NA/Enron, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Northwestern

Merchant Energy Ventures, L.L.C. (if it's available)

Kay Mann@ENRON
03/16/2001 06:17 PM
To: Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Chris Booth/NA/Enron@Enron, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Northwestern

Kathleen,

We need to set up an LLC for the Blue Dog turbines.  Chris had proposed some
names at some point, then Ben had come up with something.  I now can't
remember what it is.  Anyway, it needs to be on the list for next week.

Thanks,

Kay


Stan would like to offer out the following Astros tickets (4 tickets per
game) for the month of May, for business (first preference) or personal use,
as follows:

Monday, May 7, vs. PHI @ 7:05PM
Wednesday, May 9, vs. PHI @ 7:05PM
Friday, May 18, vs. CIN @ 7:05PM
Saturday, May 19, vs. CIN @ 1:35PM
Monday, May 21, vs. SD @ 7:05PM
Tuesday, May 22, vs. SD @ 7:05PM
Wednesday, May 23, vs. SD @ 3:05PM

Please note that game times are subject to change; please check local
listings to verify.

Cindy


Please plan on attending and presenting.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 10/30/2000
01:15 PM ---------------------------

David W Delainey
10/30/2000 01:12 PM
To: Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim
Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Derek
Davies/CAL/ECT@ECT, Stephen H Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laura
Luce/Corp/Enron@Enron, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael L
Miller/NA/Enron@Enron, Thomas A Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Zufferli/CAL/ECT@ECT, Scott Tholan/Corp/Enron@Enron, W David
Duran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Donahue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT, Max
Yzaguirre/NA/Enron@ENRON, C John Thompson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott
Josey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paul Devries/TOR/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jean Mrha/NA/Enron@Enron, David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark E
Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph Deffner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Beth Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Wolfe/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Wes Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D
Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Swerzbin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bruce
Sukaly/Corp/Enron@Enron, Doug Gilbert-Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Eric
LeDain/CAL/ECT@ECT, Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Rogers Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, Jeffery Ader/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Fred Lagrasta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jonathan McKay/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, Kay Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dorie
Hitchcock/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: 2000 ENA Offsite

Guys, attached you will find a preliminary agenda for the 2000 ENA Offsite.
As leaders of the organization, you have been invited to participate in a two
day offsite where business 2001 objectives and strategies for ENA will be
discussed.  It is scheduled to occur December 14th and 15th at the Venetian
in Las Vegas.

This is the forum to ensure that your point of view and ideas can be heard
and incorporated into our plans and iniatives as such I would encourage
everyone to attend and to stay for the entire period.  In particular, we
would like everyone to stay over Friday night and leave Saturday morning.

ENA public relations (Dorie) will manage all the logistics including air fare.

Final invitations, details and agenda will follow shortly.

Regards
Dave and John


Carlos,

Can yuou get with Rebecca on this?  It seems like we took care of this
earlier.

D

Rebecca Griffin@ENRON
10/12/2000 08:57 AM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Danny Conner/NA/Enron@Enron, Megan Parker/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sherlyn
Schumack/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Duke Energy deal #387571

Please verify if Duke deal #387571 should be on HPL meter #1040.  This
purchase normally occurs on Centana meter #77455.  Last month, Duke deal
#351653 was changed due to the meter.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Rebecca


Megan,

I changed the demand fee for Jan.  It looks like Trisha has changed the
Transport ticket for the $.11.  I agree with the header charges.

D

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Megan Parker @ ENRON                           03/14/2001 03:47 PM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Tenaska IV 1/01

TXU revised their rates for Jan 2001. They are now billing us at $0.10 and
$0.08 for contract 1671.  This was previously billed all at $0.10.  Please
change the demand fee on deal 384258 from $3,841,888.11 to $3,830,131.18.

Also, I spoke to TXU about the rate on contract 1856 (deal 452475).  They
have been billing us $0.11 and we have $0.10.  The extra cent is for the El
Paso header fee.  The pricing you gave me is for contract 1671, but also has
the header fee if you look on page 5 of 6.  You'll see a a section called
"Compression & Header Expense if Utilized".  The current rate for 1856 is
$0.01 and 0% fuel.  I will leave a copy of the contract in your chair.

Thanks,
Megan

Daren J Farmer@ECT
03/13/2001 10:54 AM
To: Megan Parker/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Tenaska IV 1/01

I have made the changes mentioned below.  I've also adjusted the spreadsheet
based on our conversation yesterday.  Take a look at it when you get a chance.

D

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Megan Parker @ ENRON                           03/13/2001 09:06 AM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Tenaska IV 1/01

We need to change the demand fees for Tenaska IV based on actuals for Jan
2001.   Tenaska owes us some additional money.  I have attached my netting
spreadsheet if you need it.

Deal 514353  Change MMBtu from 45,000 to 46,113
Deal 384258  Change amount from $3,934,644.50 to $3,841,888.11

I got your message regarding Apache.  I will just leave the pay the lesser
ofs there until they come back for it.   Also, Mark checked with TXU and we
do not have the rights to get dailies for the Tenaska meters.  He said that
only the interconnecting pipes get dailies.  For the spreadsheet, I am just
going to prorate the actuals based on the noms.

I will let you know when we receive the payment from Brazos for Feb 2001, so
you can enter the demand fee to forward the cash to Tenaska IV.

Thanks,
Megan


If we did sign it prior to getting bank approval, we would likely have to
make the WIC portion of the release, subject to the bank approval.  Otherwise
Huber could be put into the position of having the obligations but being
unable to complete it obligation due to a WIC process out of Huber's
control.  But assuming that was done, I don't see why we couldn't sign the
agreement now.

	Mark Whitt@ENRON
	Sent by: Mark Whitt@ENRON
	11/02/2000 05:42 PM

		 To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Meyer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul T
Lucci/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Huber WIC capacity assignment

I spoke with Steve Saye at WIC today and he said that they interpret the
tarrif to read that a release done at the full negotiated contract rate is
the same as the maximum rate. Therefore we can release at the $.12 rate.  He
also stated that he would begin the approval process with the banks for the
release but thought that there would be no problem with Huber's credit.  He
did state that the bank approval timing was out of his control but he would
try to expedite it. In addition, he felt that the best way to do the release
was to do it  with the first bidder meeting minimum terms and have Huber
ready to take it.  He said that it would not have to be noticed ahead of time
so noone would know that it was going  to hit the board.

My question is, can we get the contract with Huber signed prior to receiving
the bank approval for the WIC peice?

Mark


Carolyn is taking sick leave today for a Dr. appt. due to a sinus & ear
infection.
She hopes to be in tomorrow.  Please see Mark with any questions that cannot
wait until her return.

Thanks,
Sandy


To all:

The proposed sale of HPL to American Electric Power (AEP) has been signed and
the conditions for the acquisition should be completed within the coming
months.  Over the next few days, I will be forwarding more details about the
transition process.  These details will outline the employment opportunities
and transfer process to AEP.   AEP is eager to complete these arrangements,
as the pipeline is only as valuable as the people who operate it.

During the transition period, it is important that we keep the pipe line
operating at our historical level of reliability in order to meet the energy
needs of our customers.

Regards,
Brian


Hello all, I am having a bbq on Saturday, June 23 at 5:00. It is byob
your own something to barbecue. It is the weekend of the Sonoma County
Fair so those who want to - we can go check out the fair after. Please
respond. Hope everyone will be around it will be great to see
everyone.   kari

ps I galloped Oscar around the trails today and he was very happy. He
thinks he has died and gone to horse heaven! Everyone has to come and
visit him and we can gallop around the trails.


CC list suppressed...

December 13, 2000

Energy Price Volatility May Hurt Utilities' Credit

By REBECCA SMITH
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

Recent volatility in wholesale energy markets is
undermining the credit ratings and may eventually crimp
the borrowing ability of some of the nation's biggest
utilities, long regarded in the credit markets as some of
the safest bets around.

It is the worst out West, where the price of power to be
delivered Wednesday hit a new high of $1,182 per megawatt
hour on California's state-sanctioned auction, a benchmark
for the entire region. That compares with $30 a year ago.

But even utilities in the East, such as GPU Inc. of
Parsippany, N.J., and Consolidated Edison of New York,
also are at risk because they are paying higher prices
than ever for spot-market electricity purchases and aren't
always able to pass along that cost to their customers.

As an indication of just how bad things are getting,
Moody's Investors Service Tuesday put Seattle City Light
on "negative outlook," even though it is one of the
lowest-cost generators in the nation. There hasn't been
much rain in the Northwest this year and the city-owned
utility has been forced to go to the wholesale market this
month to buy 100 to 200 megawatts of electricity each day.
That isn't much energy, but with prices that have gone as
high as $1,000 per megawatt hour this week, compared with
the $24 per megawatt hour that the municipal utility pays
for power from the federal hydroelectric system, costs add
up fast. The utility, which issued $100 million in bonds
this week, is raising rates 10%, effective Jan. 1, and
will keep the rate increase in effect as long as it takes
to dig its way out.

"Prices are at absurd levels," says Seattle City Light
Superintendent Gary Zarker. "I know others are looking at
significant rate increases too."

Credit-rating agencies say they are going through their
utility portfolios and separating those with exposure to
wholesale markets from those that have enough in-house
generation to meet customer demand. Then they are trying
to figure out which of the ones that are forced to buy on
the spot market will be allowed to pass on higher costs
and which ones won't.

"You have the makings of a credit crunch when utilities
are required to buy power but aren't allowed to pass the
cost through," says Steven Fetter, managing director of
the global power unit at Fitch, the New York credit-rating
agency.

That is exactly the position California's biggest
investor-owned utilities are in. Southern California
Edison Co., a unit of Edison International, and Pacific
Gas and Electric Co., a unit of PG&E Corp., have incurred
deficits in excess of $7 billion buying power on the open
market since June and were forced to pay higher rates and
offer unprecedented guarantees to investors when they last
issued bonds.

While they are still making money from the power plants
they own, it is nowhere near enough to make up for the
shortfall. Credit ratings of both utilities were lowered
this week.

Blown the Lid Off

There is no cost relief in sight. California's grid
operator last week lifted a price cap for power it buys
each hour to keep supply matched with demand. That helped
reliability because more generators came forward and
offered energy through an orderly market, instead of
waiting for harried engineers to call them at the last
minute trying to strike a deal.

But it has really blown the lid off prices in the West.
The average cost of power sold in the day-ahead market
jumped from $250 a megawatt hour last week to $611 on
Monday, $904 Tuesday and to $1,182 for power to be
delivered Wednesday.

This has a huge impact because it applies to roughly
two-thirds of the power consumed in the state and
influences prices elsewhere. The situation differs
markedly from Eastern markets where only a small
proportion of the power consumed comes out of a daily spot
market because most utilities have long-term
power-purchase contracts that supply most of their needs.

Some of the utilities in the Northwest being slammed by
high prices will be in the position of selling power back
in May or June, provided there is enough spring-thaw
runoff to give them surplus hydropower.

Financial Pain

But utility managers worry it won't be enough to cancel
out the financial pain they are currently suffering.

Distribution utilities that deliver the power that others
generate were regarded as the safest part of the utility
business only a few months ago. Wall Street assigned them
the lowest valuations because they face regulated rates of
return.

"Sadly, we now see they chose the part of the business
with a lower upside potential and higher risk," Mr.
Fetter, of Fitch, says.

Write to Rebecca Smith at rebecca.smith@wsj.com


Attached please find the weekly Government Affairs Report.  Please keep in
mind that this is a "living document" and that any and all comments or
suggestions are encouraged.  I have added a calendar page and a
state-by-state resource page which I will be working on populating.  I have
also included some document links on the main page in the event the reader
would like more detail.  Please provide me with a list of people that you
would like to receive this report.  Also, as a reminder to the government
affairs folks, please forward any information/filings to me as soon as
possible so that I can incorporate them into the document - please include as
much detail as possible.  Thanks and feel free to contact me with any
questions/comments likes/dislikes, etc.

Marcie


imagine you have a gas well in the middle of west texas and you only have one
pipeline running to your well.  the guy who owns the pipeline can fuck you
because you have no choice but to flow your gas that way.  split connect
means you have at least 2 options to flow your gas so the price the producer
receives is more competitive and if anything happens to one pipeline you
don't have  to shut your gas in because you move it to another pipe.

i'm going out with my brother and sime guys from work tonight.   are you free
saturday day and night?

"Jennifer White" <jenwhite7@zdnetonebox.com> on 02/09/2001 11:42:51 AM
To: john.arnold@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: ....what happens at La Strada STAYS at La Strada!!!

'Split connect' isn't in my petroleum industry dictionary.  I'm counting
on you for a definition.

Do you have plans tonight?

---- "Jennifer Brugh" <jmb@triadresources.com> wrote:
> Hey gang,
>
> We are set for brunch on Sunday at La Strada on Westheimer at 1:00.
>  Please,
> please, please be there by 1:00 or we lose the table, remember what
> happened last time!
>
> Looking forward to it!
>
> Jennifer
>
>

___________________________________________________________________
To get your own FREE ZDNet Onebox - FREE voicemail, email, and fax,
all in one place - sign up today at http://www.zdnetonebox.com


Here's a draft of a research memo on options.  While I am hopeful that we can
overcome FERC's policy on reservation of capacity, our arguments obviously
need to be developed a little more before we can do that.  I know the
business folks are anxious to hear our strategy.  I would appreciate your
comments on the attached.


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 04/10/2000 06:20
PM ---------------------------

jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com on 03/22/2000 08:44:59 AM
To: " - *Scott.Goodell@enron.com" <Scott.Goodell@enron.com>, " -
*Chris.Germany@enron.com" <Chris.Germany@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: COH Storage

Let's try this. Asking COH about Summer MDQ discrepancy, probably rounding
error, will let you know.

 - coh2000-2001.xls


You're on.

	Jay Zoellner/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange
	04/02/2001 12:19 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: SBX 9 (Elimination of Standby Charges)

Jeff:

Keep up the good work on this information scramble.  Any further word on SBX
9 ?  Also, can you add me to your voluminous distribution list?  Thanks.

Jay

-----Original Message-----
From: Wright, James
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 9:45 AM
To: ~SC Dept 70 - Account Mgmt
Subject: FW: SBX 9 (Elimination of Standby Charges)

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@ENRON@EES  On Behalf Of Jeff
Dasovich/Na/Enron@EES
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 9:08 AM
To: Comnes,Alan; Schwarz,Angela; Aden,Beverly; Votaw,Bill; Barreda,Brenda;
Moffett,Carol; Corbin,Cathy; Foster,Chris; Liscano,Christina;
Calger,Christopher; Sutter,Craig; Leff,Dan; Whitehead,Debora;
Benevides,Dennis; Black,Don; Youngblood,Dorothy; Huth,Douglas; Sacks,Edward;
Melvin,Eric; Dupre,Erika; Hughes,Evan; Deltoro,Fran; Frank W
Vickers/HOU/ECT@ECT; Muench,Gayle; Dernehl,Ginger; Savage,Gordon;
Buchanan,Harold; Kingerski,Harry; Waser,Iris; Steffes,James; Lewis,James;
Wright, James; Messina,Jeff; Blachman,Jeremy; Hewitt,Jess; Hartsoe,Joe;
Denne,Karen; Bass,Kathy; Dodgen,Kathy; Gustafson,Ken; Hughes,Kevin;
Lopez,Leasa; Botello,Leticia; Muller,Mark; Suggs,Marsha; Sunde,Marty;
Eggleston,Meredith; Etringer,Michael; Mann,Michael; Cisneros,Michelle;
mpalmer@enron.com; Bresnan,Neil; Hong,Neil; Kaufman,Paul; Paula
Warren/HOU/EES@EES; Zdunkewicz,Richard; Leibert,Richard; Shapiro,Richard;
Hennessy,Rita; Badeer,Robert; Yang,Roger; Tijerina,Rosalinda;
McCubbin,Sandra; Novosel,Sarah; Gahn,Scott; Stoness,Scott; Dick,Sharon;
skean@enron.com; Mara,Susan; Leslie,Tanya; Lair,Tasha; Ted
Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT; Terri Greenlee/NA/Enron@ENRON; Belden,Tim; Spruiell,Tony;
Sharp,Vicki; Gorny,Vladimir; Curry,Wanda; William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT;
Corbally,Kathryn; Whalan,Jubran; triley@enron.com; Sanders,Richard; Robert C
Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT; Wolfe,Greg; Wright, James;
vanUlden, Dirk; Walker,Steve; Rudolph,Jennifer; Wenzel,Martin;
Condon,Douglas; wgang@enron.com; Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>; Hedy
Govenar <hgovenar@mail.acom2.com>@ENRON; jklauber@llgm.com
Subject: SBX 9 (Elimination of Standby Charges)

----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/16/2001 11:12 AM -----

 Steven Greenberg <sgreenberg@realenergy.com> 03/16/2001 11:05 AM     To: "A.
J. \"Tony\" Occhionero (E-mail)" <tocchionero@agcc.org>, "Ake Almgren
(E-mail)" <aalmgren@capstoneturbine.com>, "Amory Lovins (E-mail)"
<ablovins@rmi.com>, "Andrew Neilly (E-mail)" <andrew@gallen.com>, "Angelina
Galiteva (E-mail)" <agalit@ladwp.com>, "Anna Ferrera (E-mail)"
<anna.ferrera@sen.ca.gov>, "Anne-Marie Borbely (E-mail)"
<am.borbely@pnl.gov>, "Anthony Mazy P.E. (Business Fax)"
<IMCEAFAX-Anthony+20Mazy+20P+2EE+2E+40+2B1+20+28415+29+20703-2303@realenergy.c
om>, "Anton Paley (E-mail)" <apaley@thepolarisgroup.com>, "Arnold M. Sowell
Jr. (E-mail)" <asowell@scsa.ca.gov>, "Barbara A. Lloyd (E-mail)"
<blloyd@treasurer.ca.gov>, "Barry Safranek (E-mail)"
<barry_safranek@invensysibs.com>, "Bernard F. Kolanowski (E-mail)"
<bkolanowski@capstoneturbine.com>, "Beth Dunlop (E-mail)"
<BDunlop@gralegal.com>, "Bill Brooks (E-mail)" <billb@endecon.com>, "Bill
Morrow (E-mail)" <senator.morrow@sen.ca.gov>, "Bob Miller (E-mail)"
<bmiller@hess.com>, "Bob Wichert (E-mail)" <wichert@fuelcells.org>, "Brian
O'neil (E-mail)" <brian-oneil@alliancepower.com>, "Bruce A. Gilleland
(E-mail)" <bruce.gilleland@dgs.ca.gov>, "Bud Beebe (E-mail)"
<bbeebe@smud.org>, "Carol Glick (E-mail)" <glickc@dteenergy.com>, "Catherine
E. Witherspoon (E-mail)" <cwithers@arb.ca.gov>, "Charles Budd (E-mail)"
<charles.r.budd@ucm.com>, "Christopher J. Townsend (E-mail)"
<christopher.townsend@piperrudnick.com>, "Christopher Tooker Ph. D. (E-mail)"
<ctooker@energy.state.ca.us>, "Cindy K. Tuck P.E. (Business Fax)"
<IMCEAFAX-Cindy+20K+2E+20Tuck+20P+2EE+2E+40+2B1+20+28916+29+20446-4214@realene
rgy.com>, "Clothilde V. Hewlett (E-mail)" <chewlett@scsa.ca.gov>, "Cris
Cooley (E-mail)" <crisman@west.net>, "Daniel Bolster (E-mail)"
<dbolst@innercite.com>, "Daniel J. Dessanti (E-mail)"
<ddessanti@keyspanenergy.com>, "Daniel S. Shugar P.E. (E-mail)"
<dshugar@powerlight.com>, "David Butsack (E-mail)"
<dbutsack@americanpowernet.com>, "David Cohen (E-mail)"
<dcohen@SiliconEnergy.com>, "David Freeman (E-mail)"
<dfreem@dwp.ci.la.ca.us>, "David L. Townley (E-mail)"
<dtownley@newenergy.com>, "David Osborne (E-mail)" <dosborne@scsa.ca.gov>,
"David Palmer (E-mail)" <dpalmer@endecogroup.com>, "David Townley (E-mail)"
<dtownley@newenergy.com>, "Delaney L. Hunter (E-mail)"
<dhunter@smithandkempton.com>, "Dennis L. Randall Jr. (E-mail)"
<dennis.randall@opuswest.com>, "Dian Grueneich (E-mail) (E-mail)"
<dgrueneich@gralegal.com>, "Diane I. Fellman (E-mail)"
<difellman@energy-law-group.com>, "Dick DeBlasio (E-mail)"
<dick_deblasio@nrel.gov>, "Dominic DiMare (E-mail)"
<dominic.dimare@calchamber.com>, "Donald E. Osborn (E-mail)"
<dosborn@emud.org>, "Douglas Grandy (E-mail)" <doug.grandy@dgs.ca.gov>,
"Douglas Pulver (E-mail)" <dpulver@trizechahn.com>, "Frank Frankini (E-mail)"
<frank_frankini@equityoffice.com>, "G. Paul Horst (E-mail)"
<horstg@dteenergy.com>, "Frederick Gortner (E-mail)"
<fgortner@wesandsons.com>, "Gary C. Matteson (E-mail)"
<gary.matteson@ucop.edu>, "George Plescia (E-mail)"
<george.pplescia@sen.ca.gov>, "Greg Husebye (E-mail)"
<GHuseb@Ardenrealty.com>, "Gregory Schem (E-mail)" <gregoryls@aol.com>,
"Henry Mak (E-mail)" <hmak@socalqds.com>, "Henry Wedaa (E-mail)"
<hwedaa@bigfoot.com>, "Holly P. Thomas (E-mail)" <Holly_Thomas@nrel.gov>,
"Hope A. Schmeltzer (E-mail)" <hope@eob.ca.gov>, "Jack Flanigan (E-mail)"
<jackflanigan@flaniganlaw.com>, "Jackson R. Gualco (E-mail)"
<Jackson_Gualco@Gualco/roup.com>, "Jairam Gopal (E-mail)"
<Jgopal@energy.state.ca.us>, "James A. Westbrook (E-mail)" <jaw@wei-air.com>,
"James Gariepy (E-mail)" <gariepyj@dteenergy.com>, "Jay Morse (E-mail)
(E-mail)" <jxm@cpuc.ca.gov>, "Jayme Murray Chick (E-mail)"
<jayme.murray@sen.ca.gov>, "Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)"
<Jeff_Dasovich@enron.com>, "Jim DiCarlo (E-mail)" <nextek1@msn.com>, "Jim
Trudeau (E-mail)" <James_Trudeau@enron.com>, "Jody London (E-mail)"
<jlondon@gralegal.com>, "Joe Ianucci (E-mail)" <dua@ix.netcom.com>, "John A.
Buckel (E-mail)" <jbuckel@panattoni.com>, "John Nimmons (E-mail)"
<jna@speakeasy.org>, "John White (E-mail)" <vjw@cleanpower.org>, "Jonathan M.
Teague (E-mail)" <jonathan.teague@dgs.ca.gov>, "Joseph Galdo (E-mail)"
<jgaldo@tcplink.nrel.gov>, "Judith Foster (E-mail)" <Judy_Foster@nrel.gov>,
"Julie Spezia (E-mail)" <jaspezia@aol.com>, "Karen Lindh (E-mail)"
<karen@klindh.com>, "Kari Smith (E-mail)" <ksmith@powerlight.com>, "Keith
Davidson (E-mail)" <kdavidson@onsitesycom.com>, "Kip Lipper (E-mail)"
<kip.lipper@sen.ca.gov>, "Lawrence Lingbloom (E-mail)"
<lawrence.lingbloom@sen.ca.gov>, "Lenny Goldberg (E-mail)" <lga@mother.com>,
"Les Goldman (E-mail)" <lgoldman@skadden.com>, "Les Goldman (E-mail 2)"
<lesgoldman@aol.com>, "Leslie Kramer (E-mail)" <lkramer@brownvence.com>,
"Linda Sherif (E-mail)" <lys@aelaw.com>, "Lou Jug (E-mail)"
<lou_jug@calpers.ca.g>, "Malcolm Lewis P.E. (E-mail)" <MLewis@CTG-net.com>,
"Mark Fallek (E-mail)" <fallekm@dteenergy.com>, Mark Humphrey
<mhumphrey@realenergy.com>, "Mark Watts (E-mail)" <mwatts@s-k-w.com>, "Martin
Lagod (E-mail)" <lagod.m@soloenergy.com>, "Matt Davis (E-mail)"
<matt.davis@csfb.com>, "Matthew Freedman (E-mail)" <freedman@turn.org>,
"Maureen F. Gorsen (E-mail)" <mgorsen@wbcounsel.com>, "Michael B. Endicott
(E-mail)" <Michael.Endicott@asm.ca.gov>, "Michael Barr (E-mail)"
<barr_mr@pillsburylaw.com>, "Michael Boccadoro (E-mail)" <dgi4email@aol.com>,
"Michael Dumke (E-mail)" <mdumke@divco.com>, "Michael Shames (E-mail)
(E-mail)" <mshames@ucan.org>, "Mike Demarsi (E-mail)"
<demarsi@worldnet.att.net>, "Mike Florio (E-mail)" <mflorio@turn.org>, "Mory
Houshmand (E-mail)" <mhoushma@energy.twc.com>, "Ms. Andrea Bitterling
(E-mail)" <andreab@helixepi.com>, "Ms. Erin Sheehy (E-mail)"
<envcomp@earthlink.net>, "Murray W. Davis P.E. (E-mail)"
<davism@dteenergy.com>, "Patricia Hoffman (E-mail)"
<patricia.hoffman@ee.doe.gov>, "Patrick J. Hodges (E-mail)"
<pj.hodges@worldnet.att.net>, "Patrick N. Giordano ESQ. (E-mail)"
<rdano@dereglaw.com>, "Paul Behrends (E-mail)" <pbehrends@bolandmadigan.com>,
"Paul Clanon (E-mail)" <pac@cpuc.ca.gov>, "Paul H. Savage (E-mail)"
<phsavage@aol.com>, "Paul L. Smith (E-mail)" <paul.l.smith@ibs.invensys.com>,
"Perry Schonfeld (E-mail)" <schonfeld@lbacorp.com>, "Peter Liu (E-mail)"
<peter.liu@csfb.com>, "Pramod Kulkarni (E-mail)"
<pkulkarn@energy.state.ca.us>, "Ralph Cavanagh (E-mail)"
<rcavanagh@nrdc.org>, "Randy Chinn (E-mail)" <randy.chinn@sen.ca.gov>, "Rich
Flood (E-mail)" <rsflood@mindspring.com>, "Richard Brent (E-mail)"
<brent_richard_s@solarturbines.com>, "Richard DeBlasio (E-mail)"
<deblasid@tcplink.nrel.govE-mail:>, "Richard T. Sperberg (E-mail)"
<rsperberg@onsitesycom.com>, "Robert Laurie (E-mail)"
<Rlaurie@energy.state.ca.us>, "Robert Tetz (E-mail)"
<Robert.Tetz@dgs.ca.gov>, "Rodney B. Johnson (E-mail)"
<rjohnson@panattoni.com>, "Ryan Waddington (E-mail)"
<waddingtonr@dteenergy.com>, "Rosamond C. Bolden RPA, FMA (E-mail)"
<rbolden@dgs.ca.gov>, "Scot Duncan (E-mail)" <sduncan@clubnet.net>, "Scott A.
Castelaz (E-mail)" <castelazsa@encorp.com>, "Scott Helms (E-mail)"
<shelm@americanpowernet.com>, "Scott L. Smithers (E-mail)" <scott@divco.com>,
"Scott Samuelsen (E-mail)" <gss@uci.edu>, "Scott Tomashefsky (E-mail)"
<Stomashe@energy.state.ca.us>, "Sheryl Carter (E-mail)" <scarter@nrdc.org>,
"Shirley Rivera (E-mail)" <sfrivera@adnc.com>, "Stephen Pilch (E-mail)"
<spilch@divco.com>, "Steven A. Nissen (E-mail)" <steve.nissen@opr.ca.gov>,
"Steven Bloch (E-mail)" <steven.bloch@honeywell.com>, "Steven Brandon
(E-mail)" <sbrandon@hess.com>, "Steven Mckenery (E-mail)"
<smckenery@powerlight.com>, "Stu Wilson (E-mail)" <swilson@cmua.org>, "Stuart
Z. Shiff (E-mail)" <stuart@divco.com>, "Susan Mara (E-mail)"
<smara@ees.enron.com>, "Susan Schneider (E-mail)" <schneider@rsvl.net>,
"Suzanne Watson (E-mail)" <swatson@nemw.org>, "Terry S. Harvill (E-mail)"
<tharvill@icc.state.il.us>, "Thomas \"Tod\" O'Conner (E-mail)"
<todoc1@aol.com>, "Thomas H. Houle (E-mail)" <thoule@huntpower.com>, "Thomas
J. Danilek (E-mail)" <tom_danilek@hines.com>, "Thomas S. Basso (E-mail)"
<Thomas_Basso@nrel.gov>, "Tim Gallen (Business Fax)"
<IMCEAFAX-Tim+20Gallen+40+2B1+20+28925+29+20930-9903@realenergy.com>, "Tim
Hayes (E-mail)" <thayes@siliconenergy.com>, "Tina Kaarsberg Ph. D. (E-mail)"
<tina.kaarsberlz@ee.doe.gov>, "Todd D. Thorner (E-mail)"
<ThornerT@paceglobal.com>, "Tom Vence (E-mail)" <tvence@brownvence.com>,
"Valerie Beck (E-mail)" <vjb@cpuc.ca.gov>, "Wade C. Teasdale (E-mail)"
<wade.teasdale@sen.ca.gov>, "Ward Camp (E-mail)" <ward.camp@phaser.com>,
"William D. Browning (E-mail)" <browning@rmi.org>, "William D. Sturm
(E-mail)" <bsturm@pssarchitects.com>, "William Glauz (E-mail)"
<wglauz@dwp.ci.la.ca.us>, "William H. Booth (E-mail)" <wbooth@booth-law.com>,
"William J. Garnett Ill (E-mail)" <bgarnett@ca.academiccapital.com>, "William
P. Parks (E-mail)" <william.parks@ee.doe.gov>, Brett Schumacher
<bschumacher@realenergy.com>, Christopher Peznola <Cpeznola@realenergy.com>,
Corinne Arnaud <carnaud@realenergy.com>, Dan Cashdan
<dcashdan@realenergy.com>, Jason Conroy <jconroy@realenergy.com>, Ken
Robinson <krobinson@realenergy.com>, Kevin Best <kbest@realenergy.com>, Mark
Humphrey <mhumphrey@realenergy.com>, Paul Slye <pslye@realenergy.com>, Rachel
MacDonald <rmacdonald@realenergy.com>, Richard Megowan
<rmegowan@realenergy.com>, Robin Luke <rluke@realenergy.com>, Roger Freeman
<rfreeman@realenergy.com>, Shawtae Anderson <sanderson@realenergy.com>, Steve
Smith <ssmith@realenergy.com>, "Michael Robson (E-mail)"
<Michael.Robson@sen.ca.gov>, "Mikki Bako Sorensen (E-mail)"
<mikki.sorensen@sen.ca.gov>, "Aaron Thomas (E-mail)" <athomas@newenergy.com>,
"Andy Brown (E-mail) (E-mail)" <abb@eslawfirm.com>, "Barry Safranek (E-mail)"
<barry_safranek@invensysibs.com>, "Bob Miller (E-mail 2)"
<bobmiller302@aol.com>, "Bob Miller (E-mail)" <bmiller@hess.com>, "Cameron
\"Mac\" Moore (E-mail)" <moorecm@bp.com>, "Carl C. Lower (E-mail)"
<clower@earthlink.net>, "Daniel J. Dessanti (E-mail)"
<ddessanti@keyspanenergy.com>, "Daniel S. Shugar P.E. (E-mail)"
<dshugar@powerlight.com>, DJ Smith <djsmith@smithandkempton.com>, "Dorothy
Rothrock (E-mail)" <drothrock@camfg.com>, "Douglas Grandy (E-mail)"
<doug.grandy@dgs.ca.gov>, "Eric Wong (E-mail)" <erwong@worldnet.att.net>,
"Gary C. Matteson (E-mail)" <gary.matteson@ucop.edu>, "Greg Husebye (E-mail)"
<GHuseb@Ardenrealty.com>, "Jack Flanigan (E-mail)"
<jackflanigan@flaniganlaw.com>, "Jay Morse (E-mail) (E-mail)"
<jxm@cpuc.ca.gov>, "Jeffrey R. Jacobson (E-mail)" <jeff.jacobson@swgas.com>,
"John Nimmons (E-mail)" <jna@speakeasy.org>, "John White (E-mail)"
<vjw@cleanpower.org>, "Jonathan M. Teague (E-mail)"
<jonathan.teague@dgs.ca.gov>, "Julie Spezia (E-mail)" <jaspezia@aol.com>,
"Kari Smith (E-mail)" <ksmith@powerlight.com>, "Keith Davidson (E-mail)"
<kdavidson@onsitesycom.com>, "Kevin Duggan (E-mail)"
<kduggan@capstoneturbine.com>, "Leslie S. Spahnn (E-mail)" <spahnn@hnks.com>,
"Linda Sherif (E-mail)" <lys@aelaw.com>, "Mark Fallek (E-mail)"
<fallekm@dteenergy.com>, "Mark Watts (E-mail)" <mwatts@s-k-w.com>, "Patrick
McLafferty (E-mail)" <nextek3@msn.com>, "Paul Eichenberger (E-mail)"
<paulercw@email.msn.com>, "Paul L. Smith (E-mail)"
<paul.l.smith@ibs.invensys.com>, "Perry Schonfeld (E-mail)"
<schonfeld@lbacorp.com>, "Richard Brent (E-mail)"
<brent_richard_s@solarturbines.com>, "Scott Smithers (E-mail)"
<ssmithers@divco.com>, "Stephen Pilch (E-mail)" <spilch@divco.com>, "Steven
Bloch (E-mail)" <steven.bloch@honeywell.com>, "Ted J. Bischak (E-mail)"
<tbischak@cwpla.com>, "Thomas \"Tod\" O'Conner (E-mail)" <todoc1@aol.com>,
"Tim Gallen (E-mail)" <tim@gallen.com>  cc:   Subject: SBX 9 (Elimination of
Standby Charges)

The Distributed Energy Resources industry won a major battle yesterday.  The
California Senate Energy and Utilities Committee passed on a 7-0 bipartisan
vote, Sen. Morrow's (and while her name wasn't on this bill, it was as much
Sen. Alpert's) bill on eliminating any tariff that discriminates against
DER.  SBX 9 was derived from the omnibus DER bill SBX 35 which is still alive
and contains many important provisions fro removing additional barriers.
Yesterday's vote represents a major win because even if the bill ultimately
does not get enacted, a very important statement has been made by the
committee.  I'm sure the CPUC will take notice in their proceedings.

The DER community owes much thanks to Sen.'s Morrow and Alpert, and the
Utilities Committee Members and their staffs:
Sen. Bowen (Chair)
Sen. Alarcon
Sen. Battin
Sen. Dunn
Sen. Murray
Sen. Poochigian
Sen. Sher
Sen. Speier
Sen. Vasconcellos
Sen. Vincent

Also much thanks to everyone who worked incredibly hard and diligently on
this effort.  From the business, consumer advocacy, environmental,
government, manufacturing, and real estate communities.

Here are the highlights of yesterday's actions:

1. For IOU's- No discriminatory tariffs for new DER installed between May 1,
2000 and June 1, 2003 if DER is in combined heat and power mode.  If you have
a peaking unit with gen only, then you have until  July 1 2001, to get it
installed.
2. DER installed within the window gets the exemption until June 1, 2011.
3. The maximum capacity of the DER is 5 MW in aggregate per site.
4. The DER must have emissions levels of 9 PPM or better until the ARB
established new guidelines and standards, expected late this year or early
next year.
5. Customers with DER are still required to pay interconnection, public
purpose charges, and obligations incurred under the Dept. of Water Resources
energy purchases program.
6. The CPUC shall require the electrical corporations to include non-utility
owned DER in its planning process.
7. The CPUC is required to establish a firewall so that in the event that the
implementation of DER results in net costs to the system, those costs stay
within the customer class.
8. The CPUC shall require the utilities to establish new rates for DER that
are non-discriminatory and take into account the benefits as well as the
costs.
9. Muni's are required to review their tariffs for barriers to entry and hold
public meetings to solicit comment for recommended changes.
Now we have momentum, but there is still a tremendous amount of work to do on
the Assembly side and with Governor's office.  We need the continued
(increased) support of all of you as we move this forward.
Steven A. Greenberg
RealEnergy, Inc.

300 Capitol Mall, Suite 120
Sacramento, CA 95814
916-325-2500

mailto:sgreenberg@realenergy.com << File: mailto:sgreenberg@realenergy.com >>
www.realenergy.com


Mark's Office -
 EB3325
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Outlook-Migration-Team </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=EXCHMIGTEAM>
X-To:
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \MHAEDIC (Non-Privileged)\Calendar
X-Origin: Haedicke-M
X-FileName: MHAEDIC (Non-Privileged).pst

Piper's Assistant:  Tina Spiller - ext. 35746
McCullough's Assistant:  Linda Noske - ext. 36082


A couple of deals that we might consider reserving some prudency against.

TBG  - sale
Duke (FGT/Manchester-LNG) - purchase

I will update later today if we can think of other deals to consider.


http://www.energy.ca.gov/electricity/wscc_database_location.html
check this out

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Taylor, Michael E
Sent:	Thursday, September 20, 2001 11:52 AM
To:	Woods, Trevor
Subject:	RE:

no, but is the inevitable

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Woods, Trevor
Sent:	Thursday, September 20, 2001 11:50 AM
To:	Taylor, Michael E
Subject:	RE:

is that an order?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Taylor, Michael E
Sent:	Thursday, September 20, 2001 11:50 AM
To:	Woods, Trevor
Subject:	RE:

 << File: Emissions Mktg Fact Sheet(2) 1.doc >>

First attempt after John meeting.  Make changes.


Here is the schedule for the Wheatland plant and the confirms.  Please give
me a call if you have any questions.  Thanks!
Ben


Laurel:  Will you please contact Treasury per Lynn's email below?  Thanks.
Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 09/11/2000 01:47 PM -----

	Lynn Aven@ENRON
	09/11/2000 12:49 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Laurel Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Denis O'Connell/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: RMT Masters - booking trades

Sara:  I suppose that it is Treasury that is doing all of FX transactions
with Enron Development and Enron Netherlands.  I do not think that these
activities get pushed down to any of the regions involved.  I would contact
Cathy Moehlman or Robin Veariel in Treasury and see who does these
transactions for them and gat that person involved.

Lynn

From: Sara Shackleton@ECT on 09/11/2000 11:24 AM
To: Laurel Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Denis O'Connell/LON/ECT@ECT, Lynn Aven/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: RMT Masters - booking trades

Here's your answer.  We need to put an IMMEDIATE halt to the booking of
EnronCredit.com Limited trades with ENA (as well as the others).  Sara

P.S.  Lynn:  Is there someone we need to notify with Enron Development or
Enron Netherlands?
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 09/11/2000 11:20 AM -----

	Rhett Jackson
	09/11/2000 11:02 AM

		 To: Stephen H Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: RMT Masters - booking trades

Steve is absolutely correct -- all intercompany swap transactions between ENA
and Enron Corp. affiliates should be confirmed directly by RMT.
- Rhett

To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Rhett Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: RMT Masters - booking trades

Hopefully, none of these transactions have been "booked" for ENA by a trader
located in a foreign country.  That said, the general rule is that
intra-company transactions are generally booked directly to RMT rather than
to ENA and then back to RMT.  I have cc'd Rhett Jackson on my reply so that
he can confirm this since Rhett has become the "keeper" of the RMT technology
for our group.  Sorry for the delay in responding.  Steve.

From: Sara Shackleton on 09/07/2000 01:18 PM
To: Jeff Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen H Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RMT Masters - booking trades

The following Enron companies have recently booked financial trades with
ENA.  I think these should be booked directly with RMT.  Please advise.

Enron Netherlands Holding BV

Enron Development Funding Ltd.

EnronCredit.com Limited

Thanks for your help.  Sara


Thanks - a nice start to the year.  --Sally

James Scribner@ENRON
01/16/2001 11:35 AM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Promotion

CONGRATULATIONS !!!!!


Juan......This is Jim Cashion in Volume Management. I'll be taking over the hourly stuff from Michael Jacobson. I'm looking for some info on tag 176534.  Aquila is the CP and it looks like it was for 25 mw at $10 on 8/17/2001.  I cannot find this in the hourly P&L or in enpower.  If you could point me in the right direction, I would appreciate it. Thanks.

Jim Cashion
Enron
Volume Management
713-345-2714


Confidential -- For Settlement Purposes Subject to CPUC Rule 51
ALL:

A reminder that we are still hoping to have an initial Gas Accord II
Settlement Proposal to you by Wednesday, December 20, 2000, and the we have
canceled our proposed meeting scheduled for December 13th and 14th.
However, we also must focus on the current short-term gas and electric
market situation, as we are sure you are.  Our next meeting is still
scheduled for January 10 and 11, 2001, to present our proposal and to
receive feedback from you.

As to issues, attached are two items.  One is our current version of the
issues list, and the other is a position paper provided by the Indicated
Producers.

Again, thank you for your participation in the Gas Accord II Settlement
Process.  We look forward to providing you with our initial proposal and to
our subsequent settlement discussions.  Please feel free to call us if you
have questions or concerns.

Frank Lindh    Ray Williams
415-973-2776    415-973-3634
frl3@pge.com    rdw0@pge.com

 <<Issues List From Parties 11-27-00.doc>>  <<Indicated Producers GAII
Proposal.doc>>

 - Issues List From Parties 11-27-00.doc
 - Indicated Producers GAII Proposal.doc


Do you owe money? Is it getting troublesome keeping track
of all those bills and whom you owe how much and when? Would
it not be easier if you could just make 1 monthly payment
instead of several? We can help!

  If your debts are $4,000 US or more and you are a United
States citizen, you can consolidate your debt into just one
easy payment! You do not have to own a home, nor do you need
to take out a loan. Credit checks are not required!

  To receive more information regarding our services, please
fill out the form below and return it to us, or provide the
necessary information in your response. There are absolutely
no obligations. All the fields below are required for your
application to be processed.

**********

Full Name :
Address :
City :
State :
Zip Code :
Home Phone :
Work Phone :
Best Time to Call :
E-Mail Address :
Estimated Debt Size :

**********

Please allow upto ten business days for application
processing.

Thank You

Note: If this e-mail arrived to you by error, or you wish
to never receive such advertisements from our company,
please reply to this e-mail with the word REMOVE in the
e-mail subject line. We apologize for any inconveniences

ls2fd8x


---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 01/12/2000 05:00 PM
---------------------------

Molly Harris
01/12/2000 04:56 PM
To: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice
Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie
R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian
Hunter-Lindsay/LON/ECT@ECT, Ian Sloman/LON/ECT@ECT, Coenraad
Basson/LON/ECT@ECT, Bhautik Patel/LON/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, David
Weekes/LON/ECT@ECT, Sylvia A Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carrie Southard/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EOL Credit Responses 1/12

Please find attached Credit's EOL responses for 1/12/00.

Regards
Molly


---------------------- Forwarded by Lenine Jeganathan/HOU/ECT on 11/17/2000
05:18 PM ---------------------------

"John D'Souza" <johnd01@hotmail.com> on 11/17/2000 02:37:09 PM
To:
cc:

Subject: Drivers!!!

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.

 - oct30.jpg


I haven't received it yet that I can recall.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Graham, Carolyn
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 8:19 AM
To:	Rapp, Bill
Subject:	FW: WorldCom Calling Card

Pls confirm that you have received your new WCom calling card.   Thank you.

Carolyn Graham
Enron NetWorks LLC
Vendor Management
713-345-8008


Joe,

This is a message from the Japanese guy interested in energy risk management.
Please, let me know if you want somebody from your organization at the
meeting. He will be here
next Monday at 3:00 p.m.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/12/2000
06:11 PM ---------------------------

Masayuki Fujita <mfujita@mri.co.jp> on 03/31/2000 08:36:00 AM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc: Eugenio Perez <Eugenio.Perez@enron.com>
Subject: A visit

Professor Vincent Kaminski
Vice President of Research
Enron Corp.

Dear Professor Kaminski

    I , Masayuki Fujita was the only Japanese attendee of the Energy
Derivatives seminar
in Houston last December and a member of Japanese consultation firm:
Mitsubishi Research
Institute, Inc. I would be very honored if you can meet with me 17 or 18
April after
attending Energy Trading Summit in 12th-14th. As you know, Japanese
electricity trading is
on the way of deregulation beneficial to the consumers from a long stage of
the nine major
companies' regional monopoly. We are giving a hand to help the Ministry and
industry to
find the right course of them. I and my colleague Yamada, who will attend Risk
Publications Monte Calro seminar in Four Seasons Hotel, would like to visit
you and your
company for studying the sophisticated risk management at Enron. In return,
we may give
you the information about recent institutional progress and major electricity
companies
response in Japan.

    We are now personally translating your book "Managing Energy Price Risk"
second
edition and wondering if you have not given the right to publish in Japanese
and nay give
us the chance to help you introduce modern technology to manage energy risk
in the
Japanese energy industry.

    I do not hope Japanese English power prevent me to pass my sincerity to
you and I can
visit you soon.

    Best regards,

Masayuki Fujita
Principal Financial Engineer
Financial Technologies Section
Mitsubishi Research Institute, Inc.
3-6 Otemachi 2-chome, Chiyoda-ku
Tokyo 100-8141
Japan
Tel +81-3-3277-0582
Fax +81-3-3277-0521


Please send me the dates you plan to be out of the office during the month of
June.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/09/2001
03:45 PM ---------------------------

Celeste Roberts
03/09/2001 12:20 PM
To: Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Liz M Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Althea
Gordon/NA/Enron@Enron, Cathy Lira/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Stanford Summer Associate and Full-time Associate Recruiting

Greg:

Just an update on the Stanford Summer Associate and Full-time Associate
recruiting efforts:

We have pre-selected 19 Summer Associate candidates and 7 Full-time Associate
candidates.  The schedule of interviewers for Round 1 and Round 2 is listed
below.  I was able to get Elliot Mainzer and Steve Swain on the Round 1
interview schedule.  They were Tim Belden's picks for interviewers from his
group.  I have left a message for Chris Calger to see if he might be
available for Round 2 interviews and am waiting to hear back from him.

Listed below are logistics.  Let me know if you are available for Friday
interviews.

Regards,
Celeste Roberts

Wednesday, March 14, 7:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Dinner with students selected to
interview
       Il Fornaio, the Sala Del Canaletto Room
       520 Cowper Street, Palo Alto
       (650) 853-3888
       Attire: Business Casual

       Enron attendees:
       Vince Kaminski - MD
       Brad Alford - VP
       Matt Harris - VP
       Brad Romine - Mgr
        Theresa Riedman - Mgr
       Steve Swain - Mgr
       Elliot Mainzer - Mgr
       Martin Lin - Mgr
       Mauricio Mora - Associate
       Celeste Roberts - Director
       Althea Gordon - Recruiter

Thursday, March 15, 8:30 a.m. to 4:45 p.m.  Round 1 interviews for both
Summer and Full Time Associates
       Stanford GSB Career Services Center
       Interviewers:
       Theresa Riedman
       Brad Romine
       Brad Alford
       Martin Lin
       Elliot Mainzer
       Steve Swain
       Mauricio Mora - Greeter/Alternate Interviewer

Thursday, March 15, 12:15 p.m. to 1:30 p.m. Lunch with Dean George Parker
(Associate Dean of Academics) and
       Sherrie Taguchi (Director of Career Services).
       Stanford GSB Career Services Center
       We will be ordering lunch in.

Friday, March 16, 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.*   Round 2 interviews for both
Summer and Full Time Associates
       Stanford GSB Career Services Center
       Interviewers:
       Vince Kaminski
       Matthew Harris

* Please note that this is an approximate time that will be based on the
number of candidates who successfully pass Round 1 interviews on Thursday.

Your hotel information is as follows:

       Stanford Park Hotel
       100 El Camino Real
       Menlo Park
       (650) 322-1234

Upon confirmation of your participation you will receive your hotel
confirmation number.  In the event that you have not received your hotel
confirmation number please contact Cathy Lira, at x54049.


I'll check my billing! Thanks for the
warning!

Warm regards, and thanks for the book,

Darrell

_____________________________________________
Darrell Duffie
mail  GSB Stanford CA 94305-5015 USA
phone 650 723 1976
fax   650 725 7979
email duffie@stanford.edu
web   http://www.stanford.edu/~duffie/
_____________________________________________


Please see the attached draft limits document which was discussed at PGE's
Sept. 6th Risk Management Committee meeting.  Peggy asked that I forward this
to you prior to your Monday conference call regarding PGE Risk Management.

Kristin Stathis
Manager, Risk Management Reporting & Control
503-464-8322


Most of the time we meet these deadlines.  Several days the P&L hasn't been
exported by 7:20 b/c I was waiting for the Management p&l changes, so that
there wouldn't be such large changes between our preliminary and final
p&l's.  If you rather I didn't wait let me know.  There have been a couple of
days I've just forgotten, but that's not a regular occurance.

Robin

Jeffrey C Gossett
12/07/2000 10:48 AM
To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: timing of submitting information to Risk Controls

Are we missing any of these "deadlines" and, if so, Why?
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT on 12/07/2000
10:46 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Shona Wilson @ ENRON                           12/07/2000 10:45 AM

To: Bob M Hall/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C
Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy Hedstrom/CAL/ECT@ECT, Kathy Reeves/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Stacey W White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Monica Lande/PDX/ECT@ECT, David
Maxwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martha Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Scott Earnest/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle Bruce/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila
Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, D Todd Hall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Michael E Moscoso/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristin Albrecht/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Gary Stadler/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Meredith M Eggleston/HOU/EES@EES, James New/LON/ECT@ECT, Heidi
Mason/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jan-Erland Bekeng/AP/Enron@Enron
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike
Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT, Chris Abel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth
Thibodeaux/NA/Enron@ENRON, Michael Benien/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Daniel
Falcone/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Eugenio Perez/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: timing of submitting information to Risk Controls

Over the past few weeks, we have not been receiving information from the risk
management groups on a timely basis.    This memo serves to convey our
deadlines to you and to reiterate deadlines for the risk management group.

Our reporting is as follows (Houston time):

7:45 - posting of preliminary DPR to website (needed to be done prior to RAC
8am meeting)
7:45 - 2:00 - preparation of the violation/notification memos
2:00 - finalization of the DPR & memos

In order to meet these deadlines we need the risk management departments to
meet the following deadlines (Houston time):

before leaving to go home (Houston): officialization of books (to ensure
information is captured in VAR engine and Credit AGG)
4:00 (London):  officialization and sending of feeds to IT
7:20 (all): export of preliminary information
7:20-3:00: support on explanations of violations/notification memos
11:00 (London only): export of final information (needed at that time for
Merchant Asset group)
12:00 (Houston only): export of final information

Everyday at least one group misses the deadline, which is unacceptable.
Please ensure deadlines are met going forward.  Remember, the DPR cannot go
out until all information is received and final so one group holds up the
whole process.

Thank you,

Shona Wilson


Good news from Toronto.

Work on the documentation.

Chris


Bloomberg reports forwarded by Bracewell & Patterson.  Note the report from today in the last half.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Tracey Bradley" <tbradley@bracepatt.com <mailto:tbradley@bracepatt.com>>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Tracey+20Bradley+22+20+3Ctbradley+40bracepatt+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com] <mailto:[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Tracey+20Bradley+22+20+3Ctbradley+40bracepatt+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]>
Sent:	Monday, August 06, 2001 5:48 PM
To:	jlimone@aeglobalmarkets.com <mailto:jlimone@aeglobalmarkets.com>; Charles Shoneman; Kimberly Curry; Randall Rich; Cantrell, Rebecca W.
Subject:	El Paso Dealings Appear to Violate Rules, Judge Says (Update5)

FYI

El Paso Dealings Appear to Violate Rules, Judge Says (Update5)
By Jim Polson

Washington, Aug. 3 (Bloomberg) -- El Paso Corp. may have violated federal rules by letting its merchant energy unit outbid rivals for capacity on a natural-gas pipeline into California, a federal regulatory judge said.

Curtis Wagner, a U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission chief judge, is investigating accusations that the El Paso unit locked up more than a billion feet of capacity so other gas suppliers couldn't use it.

California utilities and government officials say El Paso used the transaction to cut the state's gas supplies and drive up prices. Wagner said he was disturbed by a transcript of telephone conversations between an El Paso merchant-energy executive and a salesman from the company's pipeline unit, who appeared to exchange information ensuring no rival could get the capacity.

``If that's not hanky-panky, there's no such thing,'' Wagner said at the hearing. ``This is the kind of stuff we passed affiliate standards to prevent, and now it's out in the open. I want to know if this sort of thing goes on every day, and I think the commission wants to know too.''

Patricia Shelton, El Paso pipeline unit president, disputed the judge's interpretation, saying the two men hadn't reached an agreement and that El Paso had followed FERC's rules properly.

The El Paso units didn't discuss the bidding process in advance, said Mark T. Mitchell, who handled the trading unit's bid. The telephone call mentioned by Wagner didn't affect the bid, Mitchell said.

Shares of El Paso fell $1.97, or 3.7 percent, to $51.25. They have fallen 28 percent this year.

El Paso's pipeline network is the biggest in North America, at more than 55,000 miles long. The Houston-based company also owns a separate merchant-trading unit that buys and sells gas.

FERC Rules

Under FERC rules, El Paso must give everyone who wants to move gas on its U.S. interstate pipelines an equal opportunity to bid for access. The rules also discourage or ban the company's pipeline and merchant units from sharing many types of information.

FERC is investigating why the average price of natural gas jumped almost fivefold in California in the first quarter from a year earlier and why prices in the state are higher than elsewhere in the U.S.

California's average electricity prices soared more than ninefold earlier in the first quarter, in part because of the cost of gas used to fuel many power plants.

New hearings into the issue started yesterday, and participants expect them to continue into next week. The judge held weeks of hearings on El Paso's role in California earlier this summer.

In addition to California's regulators, plaintiffs in the case included the state's two largest utilities, PG&E Corp.'s Pacific Gas & Electric Co. and Edison International's Southern California Edison Co.

El Paso Chairman William Wise testified May 25 that he didn't come up with the plan to have the merchant unit bid for the pipeline capacity, though he did approve it. Wise said he didn't speak to the pipeline group about the contract.
 ****************************************
 ****************************************
 ****************************************
 ****************************************

08/06 17:46

El Paso Chief Executive Won't Testify at Gas Hearing (Update2)
By Jim Polson

Washington, Aug. 6 (Bloomberg) -- El Paso Corp. faces federal sanctions on its pipeline system, the longest in the U.S., if federal officials conclude its units violated rules on bidding for California pipeline capacity.

Curtis Wagner, U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission chief administrative law judge, said the company may lose its case because Chief Executive William Wise and other executives refused to counter evidence that El Paso favored its energy-trading unit in bidding for more than a billion cubic feet of pipeline capacity.

Wagner has ``a wide range'' of sanctions he may recommend to the commission by Oct. 2, FERC spokeswoman Tamara Young-Allen said. Testimony ended today.

``The burden of proof has now shifted to El Paso Corp.'' from California's utilities and state regulators, Wagner said after testimony by executives of El Paso's pipeline and energy trading units. He said he might rule against El Paso without persuasive testimony by Wise.

``In the end, we will be vindicated,'' El Paso spokeswoman Norma Dunn said.

El Paso attorneys said Wise and other executives would only answer questions from Wagner. The judge said if they took the stand, they also would have to answer questions from California attorneys. When El Paso refused, Wagner adjourned the hearing.

Gas Prices

The FERC is looking into why the average price of gas jumped almost fivefold in California during the first quarter compared to a year earlier, and why prices there are higher than elsewhere in the country. Gas is used to fuel many power plants, and the average price of electricity at the California-Oregon border soared more than ninefold earlier this year.

California utilities and government officials say El Paso used the transaction last year to cut the state's gas supplies and drive up prices.

Wagner said he was disturbed by a transcript of telephone conversations between an El Paso merchant-energy executive and a salesman from the company's pipeline unit, who appeared to exchange information ensuring no rival could get the capacity.

``If ever a deal was made, there was a deal made there,'' Wagner said. He discounted testimony by El Paso pipeline and trading executives that the discussion was proper under federal rules and gave the trading unit no advantage in the bidding.

An April 14, 2000 memorandum to Wise and the head of El Paso's pipeline unit details ``what must happen for El Paso Merchant Energy to make it'' on the contract, Wagner said. ``If ever there were playing both sides of the fence, that's it.'' Wise testified before Wagner in May during the first round of hearings.

Competition Rules

Under FERC rules, El Paso must give everyone who wants to move gas on its U.S. interstate pipelines an equal opportunity to bid for access. The rules also discourage or ban the company's pipeline and merchant units from sharing many types of information.

In March, FERC exonerated El Paso of allegations it had favored its trading affiliate in pipeline capacity bidding, and ordered Wagner to hold hearings on whether it had manipulated gas prices. In June, after 17 days of hearings that included testimony by Wise and others, the commission allowed Wagner to expand his inquiry to include the handling of the pipeline contract.

Attorneys on both sides will make final arguments to Wagner in briefs due Aug. 24.

Shares of El Paso fell $1.30 to $49.95. They have fallen 30 percent this year.


6 months severence minus any errors

Jennifer Shipos
10/20/2000 03:22 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

How about 6 months severance?  Do you think you can work that out for me?


Looks like they have a rats nest to figure out.

ckm
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/13/2000 04:41
PM ---------------------------

"Thompson, Peter J." <peterthompson@akllp.com> on 11/13/2000 04:13:35 PM
To: "Kay Mann (E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>, "Pipitone, Paul"
<paulpipitone@akllp.com>
cc: "Pipitone, Paul" <paulpipitone@akllp.com>, "Pipitone, Paul"
<paulpipitone@akllp.com>, "Cobb, Christopher" <chriscobb@akllp.com>

Subject: GE Agreement Redline

I just opened the redline that I just forwarded to you all.  I
apologize, but it is still wrong.  The language I added shows up as a
strike-through and ther language I deleted shows up as though added.  I
am desperately atempting to get this straightened out.


FYI.  Due to this shut-in, I have taken deal 135714 to zero for the
17th-29th.  If you hear of this point coming back into service, please notify
me.

D
---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 02/18/2000
07:10 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Gary A Hanks                           02/17/2000 03:39 PM

To: Shawna Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cheryl D
King/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Earl Tisdale/HOU/ECT@ECT, James McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa
Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Shut-in of meter 0984179 Hoff Heller Unit 22 CDP

Meter 0984179 Hoff Heller Unit #22 CDP was shut-in at approximately 9:20 AM
today (February 17, 2000).

On Wednesday, February 16, the meter was found flowing 25 lb dew point gas.
The pumper was given 24 hours to correct the problem.  On February 17, the
meter was found flowing 40 lb dew point gas.

If you have any questions please call me at 36449.

Thanks
Gary H


So your overrulling me again.


Revals w/ Scott Josey & Brad Larson    your ofc


Maureen,

No problem.

Vince
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Raymond, Maureen
Sent:	Friday, June 29, 2001 12:44 AM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J
Cc:	Crenshaw, Shirley
Subject:	Vacation Time

Vince,

I would like to take vacation the week of July 23, 2001 to July 27, 2001.

Thank you,
Maureen


Stacey,

Please find attached our outstanding 1st quarter power questions.  As we are
to
sign off on the 10Q by Monday, April 14th, please provide your responses as
soon
as possible.

(See attached file: Updated#2 1st Quarter 2001  Power Questions.doc)

If you have any questions, please call me at X6-6269.  Thank you for your
help.

Jennifer

*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.  If you
are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery
of
the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to
anyone.
In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by
reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer does not
consent
to Internet email for messages of this kind.  Opinions, conclusions and other
information in this message that do not relate to the official business of my
firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.

 - Updated#2 1st Quarter 2001  Power Questions.doc


I am swamped today.

-----Original Message-----
From:	Richard Ring/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON@EES
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 1:14 PM
To:	Klemm, Aaron
Subject:	RE:

When do you think that we could set up some time to meet, via telephone call, with Patagonia.  I do not know if it is possible to do it yet today or not.  What do you think?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Klemm, Aaron
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 2:24 PM
To:	Ring, Richard
Subject:	RE:

I don't know, but it is small.

Monthly bills in the range of under 1,000 dollars a month.

-----Original Message-----
From:	Richard Ring/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON@EES
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 12:04 PM
To:	Klemm, Aaron
Subject:	FW:

Aaron,

Are you available today?  What is the approximate annual load associated with the 12-13 additional facilities of Patagonia?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mainzer, Elliot
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 1:13 PM
To:	Ring, Richard
Subject:	RE:

How about 2:00 PST today?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ring, Richard
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 11:05 AM
To:	Mainzer, Elliot
Subject:	FW:

Elliot,

When would you like to contact Patagonia?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Klemm, Aaron
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 10:34 AM
To:	Ring, Richard
Subject:	RE:

I can be there to introduce and then drop out.  Patagonia is in Ventura, CA

-----Original Message-----
From:	Richard Ring/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON@EES
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 8:15 AM
To:	Klemm, Aaron
Subject:	RE:

Do you want to be involved in the discussion with Patagonia?   Where are Patagonia's offices?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Klemm, Aaron
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 10:29 AM
To:	Ring, Richard
Subject:	RE:

Yes, thank you.

-----Original Message-----
From:	Richard Ring/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON@EES
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 8:11 AM
To:	Klemm, Aaron
Subject:	RE:

Aaron,

Did you receive the link to the Enron Wind Company site with the article regarding the Palm Springs project?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Klemm, Aaron
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 10:22 AM
To:	Ring, Richard
Subject:	RE:

I would call Jil  and Christie as they are the respective decision makers for the environmental and business sides of the coin.

-----Original Message-----
From:	Richard Ring/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON@EES
Sent:	Tuesday, October 02, 2001 1:58 PM
To:	Klemm, Aaron
Subject:

Aaron,

Which of the individuals do you suggest that we speak to at Patagonia first, Rich Costello, Christie Kelley, or Jil Zilligen ?

Thanks,

Richard


Good morning, Michael.  Will there be enough funds to help Sue without
Shell's if I wait until Mr. Lay returns on October 3?  I have not been very
successful getting faxes through to the ship, so would prefer not to have to
bother him with this unless absolutely necessary.

Rosalee

"Telle, Michael S." <mtelle@velaw.com> on 09/25/2000 06:28:00 PM
To: "'kenneth.lay@enron.com'" <kenneth.lay@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Referendum Campaign

Mr. Lay--

I have been assisting John Watson with his representation of Sports
Facilities, L.P., and I am in the process of coordinating the $1.4 million
prepayment by the Sports Authority and the contribution of such amount by
the partners to the referendum campaign.

Assuming that we receive the prepayment from the Sports Authority, we expect
to be able to start making contributions to the referendum campaign this
week.  The contributions will be paid to the referendum campaign by the
partnership, on behalf of each partner, upon receipt of instructions from
each such partner that its share of the amount prepaid should be contributed
to the campaign instead of being distributed.  I have discussed this
procedure with Sue Walden.

With respect to your arrangement with Shell, we were not sure what you and
Shell had agreed to.  The monies being contributed to the referendum
campaign are being contributed to a special purpose political action
committee (as required by law).  This special purpose PAC is subject to the
general Texas laws that govern campaign fundraising.  As you know, one of
these laws provides that "a person may not knowingly make or authorize a
political contribution in the name of or on behalf of another unless the
person discloses in writing to the recipient the name and address of the
person actually making the contribution . . . ."   Pending a better
understanding of the Shell arrangement, we will hold Shell's $100,000 in the
partnership's account.

Please contact John Watson at 713-758-2556 or me at 713-758-2350 if you have
any questions regarding the foregoing.

Sincerely,

Michael S. Telle


Hi Mark

Thanks for your prompt reply.
Just one question I'm anticipating from customers - "why can't the contracts
(PA and ETA) be governed by Japanese law - why did you choose NY law?"
Can we change these to be governed by Japanese law (this would be ideal)?

Regards
Rousseau

Mark Taylor@ECT
04/21/2000 11:02 AM
To: Rousseau Anai/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Re: FAQ - EOL Japan

We generally do not give legal advice to our counterparties - regarding tax
or other legal consequences to their trading.  The only thing we could safely
say would be something to the effect of "If you are concerned about the tax
consequences of your EnronOnline transactions, please consult your tax
advisor."

Rousseau Anai@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
04/19/2000 09:18 PM
To: Mark Taylor@ECT
cc:
Subject: FAQ - EOL Japan

Mark

In your FAQ, could you please put something about the tax consequences for
Japanese counterparties

Also, sorry to rush you but we really need something by Friday Tokyo time so
that we can put in in for translation.

Regards
Rousseau


The release of transport is uneffected by Aristech changing vendors.  The
three packages of capacity is ENA's until 5/31.  Plan on the 15000 until then.

Scott


I'd like to attend!


FYI.  DWR declines to extend option (which is amazing because our deal is one
of the few deals that would help CA - lower prices today).

Jim

----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 03/29/2001 07:04 AM -----

	Christopher F Calger@ECT
	03/28/2001 06:39 PM

		 To: Tracy Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Louise
Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT,
James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, William S Bradford/Enron@EnronXGate
		 cc:
		 Subject: DWR Option Expires

FYI - we proposed several alternatives to DWR that would effectively extend
our put swaption through the end of April for a cost to ENA of approximately
$5MM.  None of those were acceptable to DWR.  The option will therefore
expire at 5:00 PPT today.  Vikram Budraja, Advisor to Gov Davis, suggested
that we are not dealing in good faith and suggested that he will speak with
Ken Lay (we have heard this several dozen times).  In any event, I expect to
talk with DWR tomorrow to propose  a short-term transaction.  They might
accept it, reject it or prefer one of the term option proposals.


During one of the World Hunger calls a couple weeks ago I noted that the
later half of Performance Liquidated Damage refund provision in Section
10.9.8 was slighty  broken.   I volunteered to find what I thought it should
look like.   In reviewing the Arcos contract I found the corresponding
provision that seems to capture what I was concerned about.  I have included
the ARCOS provision below for everyone's review.  Some of the defined terms
do not match, but.....

14.18.2.2 If the corrections to reduce a Shortfall are completed before the
Power Island achieves Acceptance and:
(i) such corrections are made and are complete prior to commercial operation
of the Station, and
(ii) such corrections cause a reduction in the performance Shortfall
then Purchaser shall:
(a) refund to Seller an amount equal to the Performance Liquidated Damages
associated with such reduction in the Shortfall, and/or
(b) reduce the offset associated with such reduced Shortfall; however, such
reduction in offset or amount of refund shall not exceed the amount actually
offset (payment withheld) in accordance with Clause 30.8 or paid in
accordance with Clause 14.15 for such Shortfall.
14.18.2.3 If the corrections to reduce a Shortfall are completed after the
Power Island achieves Acceptance, and such corrections are completed within
one hundred eighty (180) days after the Power Island achieved Acceptance, and
such corrections cause a reduction in the performance Shortfall, then
Purchaser shall:
(a) refund to Seller an amount equal to the Performance Liquidated Damages
associated with such reduction in the Shortfall, and/or
(b) reduce the offset associated with such reduced Shortfall;
however, such refund of Performance Liquidated Damages or reduction of offset
will not exceed the amount actually offset in accordance with Clause 30.8 or
paid in accordance with Clause 14.15 for such Shortfall and the amount of
such refund or reduction of offset shall itself be reduced by the following
amounts for each day that passes from date of the Performance Test on which
the Performance Liquidated Damages were originally based upon until the date
that Seller demonstrated the improved performance:
(c) At a rate of $0.23/day for each kW that the Net Electrical Output
Shortfall of the Power Island is reduced (the "Output Liquidated Damages
Refund Reduction").
(d) At a rate of $45.00/day for each kj/kWh that the Net Heat Rate Shortfall
of the Power Island is reduced (the "Heat Rate Liquidated Damages Refund
Reduction").
14.18.2.4 No refund of Performance Liquidated Damages shall be made if the
corrections are made after one hundred eighty (180) days after Acceptance of
the Power Island, unless Purchaser elects to do so as a result of the
corrective action plan presented by Seller prior to the expiry of such one
hundred eighty (180) day period.  In the event Seller determines the cause of
a portion or all of the Shortfall prior to the expiry of the one hundred
eighty (180) day period following Acceptance, but in spite of its reasonable
efforts is not able to effect the necessary corrections to the Plant, Seller
may present a correction plan that extends beyond such one hundred and eighty
(180) day period. Purchaser, at its sole discretion, may elect to permit
Seller the opportunity to make such corrections.


Thanks Ken.  The Dynegy folks took me to New York for the analyst prsentations and made a big deal about Enron's pipelines and about me coming over.  The only problem is they never asked me if I was planning on going over.  I know their CEO and COO very well so I will probably have a choice.  I would like to see this thing through.  I committed in my current contract to stay until 3/1/05 so I would like to keep my commitment even though the options they gave me sign the contract are worthless.  I do feel an obligation to help right the ship.  My businesses keep performing well and are anchoring the ship right now.  Employees are pretty scared so having some key executives stand up and commit to stay is pretty critical.  Either way I will be fine.  Thanks for your concern.  It means alot.

Stan

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	KHortongolf@aol.com@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 9:34 AM
To:	Horton, Stanley
Subject:	thinking about you

I hope everything is going to work out ok for you. I just read about Lay
turning down his 60,000,000.00, when are they going to decide who stays and
goes?? I hope you have a buyout clause in your contract!!!!!!!!write when you
have a chance,just wanted you to know I was thinking of you.  Ken


Here's what's happening on the QF negotiations through the Treasury Dept.
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 01/16/2001 11:11 AM -----

	"Steven Kelly" <steven@iepa.com>
	01/15/2001 07:50 PM
	Please respond to "Steven Kelly"

		 To: "Wayne Kawamoto" <wkawamoto@wm.com>, "Ward Scobee"
<wscobee@caithnessenergy.com>, "Tony Wetzel" <twetzel@thermoecotek.com>,
"Thomas Heller" <hellertj@apci.com>, "Steve Ponder" <steve_ponder@fpl.com>,
"Steve Iliff" <siliff@riobravo-gm.com>, "Ross Ain" <ain@worldnet.att.net>,
"Robert Frees" <freesrj@apci.com>, "Pete Levitt" <Pete@calwind.com>, "Paula
Soos" <paula_soos@ogden-energy.com>, "Paul Wood"
<paul_wood@ogden-energy.com>, "Nam Nguyen" <nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>, "Milt
Schultz" <bfpjv@c-zone.net>, "Marty McFadden"
<marty_mcfadden@ogden-energy.com>, "Ken Salvagno" <kbssac@aol.com>, "Ken
Hoffman" <khoffman@caithnessenergy.com>, "Jonathan Weisgall"
<jweisgall@aol.com>, "Joe Ronan" <joer@calpine.com>, "Joe Greco"
<joe.greco@uaecorp.com>, "Jack Pigott" <jackp@calpine.com>, "Hap Boyd"
<hap.boyd@enron.com>, "Frank Misseldine" <fmisseldine@caithnessenergy.com>,
"Ed Tomeo" <ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>, "Ed Maddox"
<emaddox@seawestwindpower.com>, "Duane Nelsen" <dnelsen@gwfpower.com>, "Doug
Levitt" <SDL@calwind.com>, "Doug Fernley" <fernley.doug@epenergy.com>, "Dean
Gosselin" <dean_gosselin@fpl.com>, "Bob Escalante"
<rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "Bob Ellery" <bellery@spi-ind.com>, "Bill
Woods" <billw@calpine.com>, "Bill Carlson" <wcarlson@wm.com>, "Bill Adams"
<sangorgon@aol.com>, "Alex Sugaoka" <Alex.sugaoka@uaecorp.com>, "Lucian Fox"
<lucian_fox@ogden-energy.com>, "Rich Dyer" <Rich_dyer@ogden-energy.com>, "Ted
Cortopassi" <TCortopassi@ogden-energy.com>, "William Hall"
<wfhall2@duke-energy.com>, "Sue Mara" <smara@ect.enron.com>, "Roger Pelote"
<roger.pelote@williams.com>, "Rob Lamkin" <rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, "Kent
Palmerton" <kent.palmerton@williams.com>, "Jeff Dasovich"
<jdasovic@enron.com>, "Greg Blue" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "Eric Eisenman"
<eric.eisenman@neg.pge.com>, "Curt Hatton" <curt.hatton@gen.pge.com>, "Cody
Carter" <cody.carter@williams.com>, "Carolyn Baker"
<cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "Mark Smith" <Mark.J.Smith@fpl.com>
		 cc: "Jan Smutny-Jones" <smutny@iepa.com>, "Katie Kaplan" <kaplan@iepa.com>,
"Carol Hudson" <Chudson@iepa.com>, "Steven Kelly" <steven@iepa.com>, "Andy
Brown" <abb@eslawfirm.com>, "Doug Kerner" <dkk@eslawfirm.com>, "Kent Burton"
<kent_burton@ogden-energy.com>
		 Subject: Fw: PG&E QF Forbearance and Energy Pricing Principles

Attached are the PG&E QF Forbearance and energy pricing principles developed
in the PG&E/QF-Gas Working Group.  This principles will be discussed
tomorrow, Tuesday;
----- Original Message -----
From: Diane Fellman <difellman@energy-law-group.com>
To: Carol Hudson (E-mail) <chudson@iepa.com>; Steven Kelly (E-mail)
<steven@iepa.com>
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 7:55 PM
Subject: FW: PG&E QF Forbearance and Energy Pricing Principles

> Dear Carol,
>
> Steven asked me to forward this to you.  He asked to forward this to the
> Restructuring Task Force and the QF Contract Task Force.  Call him on his
> cell phone if you have any questions.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Diane I. Fellman
> Energy Law Group LLP
> 1999 Harrison Street, Suite 2700
> Oakland, CA 94612
> Telephone:  (415)703-6000
> Facsimile:   (415)703-6001
> email:  difellman@energy-law-group.com
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Manheim, William (Law) [mailto:WVM3@pge.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 7:21 PM
> To: 'difellman@energy-law-group.com'
> Subject: FW: PG&E QF Forbearance and Energy Pricing Principles
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Alcantar [mailto:mpa@aelaw.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 7:16 PM
> To: Kugelman, Richard; Hapner, Dede; Manheim, William (Law); Reid, Alice
> (Law); Steve Greenwald
> Cc: Joe Karp; Doug Kerner; Jerry Bloom; Evelyn Kahl Elsesser; James A.
> Ross
> Subject: PG&E QF Forbearance and Energy Pricing Principles
>
>
> Attached is our draft for further discussion.  The draft is in
> Wordperfect format.
>
>
>

 - 01-15-01 PG&E & QF Energy Pricing Principles for DC Summit.wpd


FYI,

Peter del Vecchio and his wife Nair are the proud parents of Dante Valentin
del Vecchio.  Dante's surprised early arrival was last night at 10:20 p.m. at
St. Luke's Hospital, weighing in at 4 pounds, 8 ounces and he is 17 inches
long.  Dad was out of town (on business in Canada) but, did make it to the
hospital in time (10:10 p.m.).  At this notice, everyone is doing well.

Carolyn George


Sounds great!  I think Chicago will be a pretty good time.  Talk to you soon
about it.
Ben