I'm sure you're aware but wanted to forward the latest from ESPN.com

Faulk To Undergo Knee Surgery
http://espn.go.com/nfl/news/2000/1105/860356.html  From the article:  St.
Louis Rams running back Marshall Faulk will undergo surgery Monday to remove
loose cartilage from his right knee, an injury that forced him out of Sunday
night's loss to the Carolina Panthers.

Faulk practiced Friday and went out for (pregame) warmups after having the
knee drained earlier Sunday, but the knee began to lock on him. Coach Mike
Martz said team doctors told him Faulk would miss only 2-3 weeks. But
teammate D'Marco Farr, a defensive tackle, was out a month with a similar
operation.

"He could feel the cartilage getting hung up in there," Martz said. "Really,
there was nothing else to do."

Justin Watson started in place of Faulk, who leads the NFL with 1,326 yards
from scrimmage. Faulk suited up for the first half, but was wearing sweats
after the break.
Watson scored on a 3-yard run in the third quarter, but finished with 12
yards on 12 carries.

Faulk has been playing with a sore knee most of the season. An MRI on Monday
also revealed torn scar tissue and an enlarged bruise in addition to the
loose cartilage.

My View:   Coach Mike Martz called him "Superman" last week as he battled
through injuries.  Apparently, he's mortal after all.  The surgery to remove
the loose particles is relatively uninvasive and he should be back in 2-3
weeks.  If you started Faulk, don't be kicking yourself.  There was nothing
you or anyone else could have done.  As of late Sunday afternoon / evening,
he was still the starter.  You can't control last minute scratches when a
player has a problem during pregame warm-ups.  All Faulk owners knew he
wasn't 100% but we all know he's still one of the best RBs in the game even
when dinged up.  Hindsight is 20 / 20. Let it go.

All you can do is move forward.  Let's look at it analytically:

The problem now becomes a matter of timing.  If Faulk comes back according
to schedule, he'll be ready in week 13 or 14.   Most FF leagues play a 14
game regular season with playoffs in weeks 15 and 16 (or 17 if your league
hasn't wised up yet)  This means Faulk will likely miss your regular season
but be available for your Fantasy League Playoffs.

For Teams that own Faulk:  As we predicted, Justin Watson carried the load
for Faulk but he was hardly impressive with 12 yards on 12 carries, although
he did get the TD.  I'd think he'll improve but it's obvious Faulk, not just
the system, is the driving force behind his success.  What I'm saying is
that plugging Watson in is not a situation like Trent Green or Jeff George
stepping in.  Watson struggled and one has to worry about Trung Canidate (if
he ever sheds the candybone label) or Robert Holcombe.  A better option
might be taking a look at some less glamorous RBs that are playing very well
right now like Chicago's James Allen, Buffalo's Sammy Morris or J.R. Redmond
in New England.  If you've got a playoff spot secured, don't panic.  Grab a
lesser RB via trade or free agency and hang on for the playoffs, keeping
your fingers crossed for a quick and full recovery.  If you need a big push
just to make the playoffs, I'd think very hard about dealing Faulk and
shoring up your short term needs.  You have to remember, you've got to MAKE
the playoffs in order to win your Fantasy Bowl.

For Teams who don't own Faulk:  The question you must ask yourself is do you
have depth somewhere that you'd be willing to trade away for Faulk?  If you
seem a lock for the Fantasy Playoffs, it might be a great move.  In other
words, you trade some depth away for an injured Faulk that you know will be
a bench player for you over the next few weeks. In turn, you get Faulk back
just in time for your playoff push.  But you're banking on #1 Making the
playoffs and #2 Faulk being ready by week 14.  Only you can judge your
chances for #1 but from all I'm hearing, #2 seems pretty darn likely.  If
you've got the playoffs spot sewn up, it could be a great move to trade for
Faulk now.  Don't give up too much.  Don't hesitate to let the Faulk owner
know that teammate D'Marco Farr was out of action for a month with a similar
injury and we all know a RB's knee takes much more stress with the cutting
that does a Defensive Tackle's.  Throw in some comments about St. Louis
resting Faulk for the playoffs.

Speaking of the "resting for the playoff" factor - You have to look at how
well the Saints are playing.  The Super Bowl  champs are in real danger of
not even winning their own division.  It looks like St. Louis will be
battling to the end of the regular season so while still a possibility, the
Rams resting all their players doesn't seem as likely as it did a month ago.
Another reason you shouldn't give up too much in trading for Faulk.  Make
sure to "sell" your position either way based on whether you're a Faulk
owner or not.  If you're trading him away, you want to talk up the Saints
and the tough scenarios if St. Louis loses again (the hot Giants are next on
the road).  St. Louis will be fighting for their lives you'll say.  If
you're dealing for Faulk, obviously, you'll take the other side of the fence
and talk about how Martz is smart and will likely rest Faulk for the
postseason.

The truth, in my opinion, lies closer to the side of Faulk will be pressed
back into service for the regular season.  Assuming the surgery / rehab goes
well of course.  Faulk's one of the tougher guys in the league, so I have no
reason to believe he won't make a normal recovery.

Bottom line is look at this situation going forward.  You can't do anything
about what's happened.  Make it work to your advantage over the next few
weeks.  Good luck!

I'll see you tonight with the Upgrade and Downgrade Player Report.

Joe

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cheatsheets-unsubscribe@egroups.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 07/21/2000
08:12 AM ---------------------------

"hollyw" <hollyw@email.msn.com> on 07/20/2000 12:16:31 PM
To: "Stephanie Sever" <Stephanie.Sever@enron.com>, "Darron Giron"
<dgiron@enron.com>, "Rochelle Smith" <rochelle@waterengineers.com>, "Sheri
Thomas" <Sheri.Thomas@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: new braunsfels

hey,
we have a 3 bedroom 2 bath at Camp  Warneke Estates reserved for the
babelicious chick squad, Aug 18 -  20.?? Let me know that you girls are in
for sure........Sheri, pass  this on to necessary personnel, cuz I don't have
everybody's email  addresses.? Derwood, pass on to the Popester.?
Lets see if we can cram like 20  people into this place!
Party on!
?
Holly


Southern Company

SPP


The report named: East Power Position <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=16&report_name=East+Power+Position&category_cd=5&category_name=EAST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=5&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=10/26/2001>, published as of 10/26/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


Please check inot this

-----Original Message-----
From: enron_update@concureworkplace.com
[mailto:enron_update@concureworkplace.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 12:27 AM
To: Whitt, Mark
Subject: Expense Report Receipts Not Received

Employee Name: Mark Whitt
Report Name:   MW100901
Report Date:   10/9/01
Report ID:     3C4E4301BCE311D59285
Submitted On:  10/10/01

You are only allowed 2 reports with receipts outstanding.  Your expense reports will not be paid until you meet this requirement.


The closing schedule for the sale of Brownsville and Caledonia to Cinergy is as follows:

Preclosing - Thursday, March 22
Closing  - Friday, March 23

If you are aware of issues that need to be resolved prior to closing, please bring them to my or Stuart Zisman's attention.  Additionally, if you have been co-ordinating activities with specific Cinergy people, please contact them to make sure they are aware of closing timeline and are on track for fulfilling their obligations.

Thanks,

Don


I will be out of the office on Monday Aug. 13th taking a PowerPoint 2000 class with Kinetics.
If you need any assistance during my absence please see Debra Davidson or any other
administrative staff in West Power Trading.

Thanks,
Jill Chatterton
Enron North America
Tel:  (503) 464-8216
Fax: (503) 464-7996
jill.chatterton@enron.com


Guillermo Canovas has joined Govt Affairs from Enron's Argentina office.  He
has experience in working with the Argentine gas regulator for 5 years and
with
 Enron for almost 3 years on gas open access issues.  I have talked with
Becky about having him help in our gas group.  Jeff -- he can also help you
as necessary.  Becky is going to provide him some information on the gas
structure in the US.  Thanks.


---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Faunce/US/Raytheon on
01/10/2002 12:04 PM ---------------------------

Mike Marcoux <mmarcoux@boston-engineering.com> on 01/10/2002 11:03:32 AM

To:   George Barroso <gbarroso@netnumina.com>, Matt Faunce
      <matthew_faunce@raytheon.com>, Charlie Toole
      <ctoole@boston-engineering.com>, Eric Atherton
      <eatherton@nuvera.com>, Michele Beaulieu <sheisshort@yahoo.com>, Mary
      Le Blanc <Mary.LeBlanc@Aspentech.com>, Todd Cadle
      <tcadle@amicas.com>, Kim Clendening <kclendening@TRITONSYS.com>,
      Scott Collins <scott.coll1@radiomed.com>, Kristina Crichton
      <kcrichto@hotmail.com>, "David. Crowell" <david.crowell@vaisala.com>,
      Glen Cunningham <glenc@toshibasf.com>, Desir?e DiMichele
      <ddimichele@mecf.org>, Jamie Dipoli <jdipaoli@rjagroup.com>, Beth
      Fleming <bethflem@yahoo.com>, Paul Fleming <pflem_98@yahoo.com>,
      Billy Gallant <jabawalky@rcn.com>, Michael Giles
      <MGiles@loomissayles.com>, Nate Hequembourg
      <NHequembourg@ma.slr.com>, Lesley Keays <Lesley.Keays@parexel.com>,
      Jason Kuhne <jkuhne@cisco.com>, Kevin Ledoux <deucicle@aol.com>, Ann
      Marie <goldylocks13@aol.com>, Erin Meara <mearae@mediaone.net>,
      jessica monteiro <jessica.monteiro@cingular.com>, Melissa Murgo
      <melismurgo@yahoo.com>, Deirdre Neylon
      <Deirdre_Neylon@harvardpilgrim.org>, Mike Norris <mnorris@aware.com>,
      Andrew Nutting <ADNutting@WellManage.com>, "Dennis O'brien"
      <dobrien@law.harvard.edu>, Dave Pasquale
      <dave@accurateconsulting.com>, Melanie Porter
      <melanie.l.porter@bellatlantic.com>, Kersten Schweppe
      <KERSTEN.Schweppe@CINGULAR.COM>, Tim Spence
      <timothy.w.spence@baesystems.com>, Brenda Williams
      <brens_13@hotmail.com>, Rachel Williams <rwmarie@hotmail.com>
cc:

Subject:

Matty & Geo,

Could you forward this message around for me?  Grassy-ass.
---------------------------------------------------------------

I know it's really early to be looking, but I'd rather get the ball rolling
now than later.  In July, my roommate is moving out to full fill her life
long dream of becoming a domestic partner to a short hairy angry Italian,
and I'll either be looking for a new roommate or a new place.  My apartment
now is in West Newton, it's a 2nd floor 2 bedroom, den, screened in front
and back porch, washer/dryer, Swedish suck machine, etc. and about
$1450/month (includes jack squat).  Anyone interested or know of anyone
who's not a complete psychopath Or doesn't mind living with one, let me
know. L8R

Mike Marcoux
Mechanical Design Engineer
Boston Engineering
26 Fox Road
Waltham, MA 02451
P: 781-466-8010 EXT 20
F: 781-466-8020
Email: mmarcoux@boston-engineering.com
www.boston-engineering.com


Dear Paul,

With reference to the message below and further to my fax to Mr Sanabria
dated 25th September (copied to you), could you please follow up the latest
status with him, as I have not received any direct communication from him
as to why this invoice is still outstanding.

I would appreciate your urgent attention to this matter.

Regards,

Debbie

"Y'Barbo, Paul" <Paul.Y'Barbo@enron.com> on 02/08/2001 21:05:37

To:   <dynegyuk@dynegy.com>
cc:

Subject:  FW: Invoice 11-AR-9281-9PC

Please forward to Debbie Alleyne.   Thanks.

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:   Y'Barbo, Paul
> Sent:   Thursday, August 02, 2001 12:12 PM
> To:     'debbie.alleyne@dynegy.com'
> Cc:     Sanabria, Jaime; Maltes, Miguel
> Subject:     Invoice 11-AR-9281-9PC
>
>
> Debbie,
>
> I have forwarded the above invoice ($61,621.83) for payment to Jaime
> Sanabria of EcoElectrica. Jaime's contact numbers are Telephone (787)
> 759-0203 and FAX (787) 282-0986. Please let me know if I can be of
> further assistance.
>
> Regards,
>
> Paul

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


angela thorson
5709 faye st
nacogdoches, TX 75964
angel2@txucom.net

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

angela thorson


Start Date: 4/29/01; HourAhead hour: 14;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042914.txt


OK by me.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Meredith, Kevin
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 11:02 AM
To:	Lin, Homer; King, Joe; Taylor, Mark E (Legal)
Cc:	Garner, Kate
Subject:	Baltic Exchange changes

Please review the proposed changes(shown in blue) to the Tanker Freight products as a result of the Baltic Exchange index changes.  If we receive your approval of the change, we will make the change to the short and long description this weekend.

Tkr Freight Swap BITR BDTI 9                  Dec01           WS/mt

A financial swap Transaction with Enron North America Corp. under which the Seller pays a Floating Price and the Buyer pays a Fixed Price in each case in respect of the Notional Quantity per Determination Period.  Each calendar month during the term of the Transaction will be a Determination Period, provided that, if the term of the Transaction is less than one calendar month, the Determination Period shall be the term of the Transaction. The Fixed Price shall be equal to the Flat Rate (as defined below) multiplied by the percentage submitted by Counterparty via EnronOnline.  The Notional Quantity per Determination Period shall be the volume submitted by Counterparty via EnronOnline. The Floating Price shall be the Index.  The Payment Date shall be the fifth Business Day following the date on which the Floating Price is determinable.
The term of the Transaction shall be from the Effective Date (or start date) to the Termination Date (or end date). The Effective Date (or start date) is 01 Dec 2001. The Termination Date (or end date) is 31 Dec 2001.
The Index shall be the arithmetic average of the prices in the Determination Period. Such prices shall be calculated by multiplying the Flat Rate (as defined below) for the route known as ["70,000 tonnes loading Puerto La Cruz to Corpus Christi"] by the World Scale (or "WS") under the heading 'The Baltic International Tanker Route (BITR) Baltic Dirty Tanker Index (BDTI); Route [9]' whenever published by The Baltic Exchange Limited within the Determination Period. The Flat Rate is the rate in US dollars per metric tonne as published by Worldscale Association (London) Limited and Worldscale Association (NYC) Inc.  in effect on the last day of the Determination Period for the above mentioned route.  If for any reason the Baltic Exchange Limited does not provide any prices during the Determination Period, then the Forward Freight Agreement Brokers Association ("FFABA") may be instructed by either Enron or Counterparty to form a panel to establish such price, which will be binding on both Counterparty and Enron.
The price quoted on EnronOnline is World Scale (or "WS"), expressed as a percentage of the Flat Rate. The Contractual Currency will be US dollars.
The unit of measure against which the price is quoted shall be metric tonnes and the quantity shown shall be the number of LOTs per Determination Period (each LOT being 5000 metric tonnes).

Kevin Meredith

EnronOnline
(713) 853-9555


I suspect this didn't get to you as I originally used your MSN address.  DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 08/14/2000
08:59 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Drew Fossum                           08/13/2000 01:25 PM

To: Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven
Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lindy
Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julia White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sheila
Nacey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, darveaux@tconl.com,
jeffery fawcett@msn.com, fkelly@gbmdc.com, Sstojic@gbmdc.com

Subject: Re: TW's 637 Filing

Attached is my redline of your Sat. draft.  In addition to the revisions in
the doc, I have a few questions and concerns:
1.  On the segmenting section, I think it is a fine legal argument, but it
lacks something.  What is our "or else" position?  Does the Global Settlement
give us any FERC-out rights or colorable argument that the entire deal should
be unwound if FERC screws up the segmenting issue?  I'm not suggesting that
we should trigger a FERC out if we have one, but if we arguably do, we should
consider threatening to use it.  I'm afraid we come across as whiny and
FERC's position will likely be "so what, what are you going to do about it?"
If we have no arguable "FERC-out" and the only  "or else" we have is that
we'll take them to Court and force them to adhere to the original deal, I'm
for leaving the draft as-is.  We can make our appeal threat more direct on
rehearing if they hose us in the initial order.
2.  On the arbitrage argument, I've taken out any reference to an example and
softened the verbiage a bit.  I want to leave in the references to the
arbitrage issue, however, because FERC understands the problem and believes
it is widespread.  We don't need to prove exactly how big a problem it is on
our system (although it would have been very effective if we had clear facts).
3.  Do any of the OBA changes arguably conflict with the Global Settlement?
If so, we'd  better be prepared to eat our words from the segmenting
section.  Covering ourselves in the sanctity of that Settlement in section 1
and then fiddling around with it in section 2 won't play well.  It is my
understanding that the OBA system on TW was not part of the turnback
resolution deal so I hope this won't be a problem.
4.  On FN 20, I'd suggest we use Vig's data and chart for May of 2000.  The
arb opportunity is huge and clear.  We reference in the FN that we use all
six of the Gas Daily price points, and I think Vig used just 3.  What's the
right answer?

Good work everyone--please give it one more careful look on Monday AM and it
should be good to go.  DF

Maria Pavlou
08/12/2000 08:33 AM
To: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan
Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeffery
Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lindy Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julia
White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sheila Nacey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Shelley
Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, darveaux@tconl.com, jeffery fawcett@msn.com,
fkelly@gbmdc.com
cc:

Subject: TW's 637 Filing

I have tried to incorporate comments from our meeting last Thursday as well
as written comments provided to me.  There are still some areas that we need
to decide on.  For example, we need to determine if arbitrage argument works
and finalize related Exhibits.  Also, re:  daily imbalance pricing at points
that have EFM, are we keeping the 25,000 Dth??  Also, I'm not sure whether we
confirmed that we have only called one Alert Day since 1994.  Finally, we
need to double check the tariff language on autobalancing per note on page 29
of draft.  Please review and provide me with comments early on Monday.
Thanks.  Maria


I may make the tour through the going aways, esp Oz.  I called the spa to
make appts, but got voice mail.

Love,

Kay

"Neil Mann" <nmann@erac.com> on 04/27/2001 03:54:59 PM
Please respond to <nmann@erac.com>
To: "C. Kay Mann \(E-mail\)" <Kay.Mann@Enron.com>
cc:

Subject: michael and other stuff

Good afternoon. Hope you day is going well. One week from today, you will be
at the spa!! I know you are excited. I'm excited for you!
You are out this evening, right? I was going to suggest something for the
grill but we can do that tomorrow. Maybe fish?  I will leave here about 4:15
for our New Area Mgr Happy Hour at 4:30 and will pick up Michael before six.
Check to see if you have an Express Scripts Rx card. It's paper not plastic.
That's why Paige had problems yesterday. I know I gave her one but I can't
remember if I gave you one or not
I will try you on your cell phone on my way. Love, NM


Sent on behalf of Lori Maddox -please see attached.

Marci Kelly
Executive Assistant, EOTT Energy
Phone:  713.993.5681
Fax:  713.402.2478
marci.kelly@eott.com


Yes, I'll be in Houston this week.  We could discuss there. But might be
useful to discuss tomorrow when you return.  I'm available.  Seems useful to
try to get a start on it tomorrow.  You available for a quick call?  My
schedule's pretty flexible.

Best,
Jeff


Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.

Internet Daily for Wednesday, July 18, 2001
by Frank Barnako CBS MarketWatch.com

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Napster says rights holders will get 50%

Napster told users on Wednesday it is completing work on a
fee-based service that will soon undergo testing. "Over half of
what you pay Napster will go directly to the artists,
songwriters and other rights holders whose works are transferred
between members of the Napster community," the company said in
an e-mail message to users. Napster said the new service will
charge a "small" monthly fee. A sneak peek at the new Web
service is available online. The screen shows features including
e-mail, messaging, a music player and a Web page highlighting
music and artists.

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Print your own movie tickets

Fandango.com said that moviegoers in New York and California
will be able to purchase and print out movie passes at home.
Loews Cineplex in New York, including 13 theaters, and San Jose,
Calif.-based Century Theaters are partnering with a new online
ticketing company, Fandango.com. "It's a convenience for our
customers," says Mindy Tucker, a Lowes vice president, "We think
it will revolutionize the way people buy tickets," she told the
Industry Standard. The print outs will be given to a clerk at
the theaters. They will be scanned, a receipt printed and
tickets issued.

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Britannica.com readies premium plan

Britannica.com said it would charge $5 a month, or $50 a year,
for access to the full text of the Encyclopedia Britannica
online. The encyclopedia has been available free since October
1999. The new premium service will be supplemented later this
year with a database of video clips and an encyclopedia for
elementary school students. The site will still offer some
material at no charge, including the opening paragraphs of
encyclopedia articles.

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Microsoft renames WebTV

Microsoft said it is changing the name of its WebTV Internet
service to MSN TV. "Users will experience greater integration
and benefit from ongoing developments to the key MSN services
that they are currently using," said Yusuf Mehdi, vice president
of MSN and the Personal Services Business Group at Microsoft
Corp. The MSN Network announced it has added e-mail filtering
tools to its Hotmail service to help users manage their messages
and ignore junk e-mail.

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Online teens want to shop

Almost one-third of teenagers use the Internet to window shop.
While 89% of teens, ages 13-17, have never made an online
purchase, 29% have researched products on the Internet before
buying them at stores, according to research by Jupiter Media
Metrix. Although teens don't own credit cards, they visit the
same sites as adults, including Amazon.com and eBay. "Many teens
use the Internet as a shopping mall -- a place to meet friends,
play games and shop, even without the intent to purchase," said
Jared Blank, a Jupiter Media Metrix analyst. There is a lesson
in the numbers for marketers. "Integrating online and offline
channels is imperative for retailers trying to reach teenagers,"
Blank said.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

For late-breaking market news you can't afford to miss, go to
http://CBS.MarketWatch.com/

#################################################################

Log in using the links below to:

Access your account:
https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start?SANC=CCBodyi&NeedCASelValue=Y

View your Email Alert customization options:
https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start?SANC=EAMyAlerts

Perform research or request a market quote:
https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start?SANC=Quotes

Place a trade order:
https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start?SANC=TradeStock

To visit Schwab's home page, use this link:
http://www.schwab.com/

-----------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe or modify your Email Alert customization options,

log in using the link below or copy and paste it into your
browser's address window:

https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start?SANC=EAMyAlerts

Now you can receive graphics Email Alerts in HTML format,
using helpful, full-color graphics and active Web links that
connect you directly to information you want. Use the link
below to log in and change your email format preference:

https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start?SANC=EAEditEmailAddr

----------------------------------------------------------------

Notice: All email sent to or from the Charles Schwab corporate
email system may be retained, monitored and/or reviewed
by Schwab personnel. (1000-8752)

Copyright 2001 CBS MarketWatch. All rights reserved.
Commercial use or redistribution in any form, printed or
electronic, is prohibited.
Distribution by Quris, Inc.


Please review the attached letter and supporting spreadsheets concerning the correction of billing errors between Citizens and Enron relative to our Colorada Gas Division.  A hardcopy of these documents is following via US mail.  Please call me at 520.226.2216 if you have any questions on this matter.

<<CitizensLGSReconciliationLetter10-10-01.doc>> <<CitizensLGSReconciliationCUC10-10-01.xls>>


Guys,

Puget is claiming that we did a real-time deal with their trader, Lisa, on
October 17 HE 20.  The terms are 20MW purchased from Puget at a rate of
$115.  We cannot find anything in the Inc or Services sheet, and nothing is
in EnPower.   Please look in your trade books for this deal to confirm.  I
will get more information from Puget if I can, but so far, that's all I know.

Thanks,

Caroline

PS  Please respond to Virginia on this, whether you did the deal or not.


Please review.

Greg,

After making an election in October to receive a full distribution of my deferral account under Section 6.3 of the plan, a disagreement has arisen regarding the Phantom Stock Account.

Section 6.3 states that a participant may elect to receive a single sum distribution of all of the participant's deferral accounts subject to a 10% penalty.  This provision is stated to be notwithstanding any other provision of the plan.  It also states that the account balance shall be determined as of the last day of the month preceding the date on which the committee receives the written request of the participant.  In my case this would be as of September 30th.  I read this paragraph to indicate a cash payout of 90% of the value of all deferrals as on September 30, 2001.  The plan administrators, however, interpret this paragraph differently.  Their reading yields a cash payout of 90% of the value for deferrals other than the Phantom Stock Account, which they believe should be paid with 90% of  Enron Corp. shares in the account as of September 30, 2001.  Their justification is that in several places throughout the plan document and brochures it is stated that the distributions of the Phantom Stock Account shall be made in shares of Enron Corp. common stock.

There are two reason that I do not agree with their interpretation.  First,  section 6.3 begins with "notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan."  This indicates that any other payout methodologies described in other sections of the plan which deal with normal distribution at termination do not apply.  Second, the language in section 6.3 stating "a single sum distribution of all of the Participant's deferral accounts" indicates that one payment will be made not a cash payment separate from a share distribution.

The interpretation of the administrators goes beyond section 6.3.  If that is the case then section 7.1 should apply.  This section does provide for the Phantom Stock Account to be paid in shares.  However, it states "The value of the shares, and resulting payment amount, will be based on the closing price of Enron Corp. common stock on the January 1 before the date of payment, and such payment shall be made in shares of Enron Corp common stock".  This would result in approximately 8.3 shares to be distributed for every share in the account on January 1, 2001.  Although this would be the most beneficial to the participants due to the decline of the value of Enron Corp. common stock from $83 to $10 per share,  this methodology goes beyond section 6.3.

The calculations below illustrate the difference in the value and method of distribution under each of the three interpretations:

Section 6.3		Plan Administrators		Section 7.1

Number of shares		6,600	shares		6,600	shares			6,600 shares
Relative share price		$27.23							$83.13
Phantom Stock Value		$179,718						$548,658
10% Penalty			-17,972			 -600				-54,866
Value to be distributed		$161,746		6,000 shares			$493,792
Current stock price									$10
Distribution			$161,746		6,000 shares			49,379 shares

I believe my interpretation under section 6.3 is correct and fair.  If the administrators insist on distributing shares instead of cash then section 7.1 should apply.  The current interpretation of the plan administrators is a hybrid between the two sections resulting in the lowest possible payout.

In addition to myself, Tom Martin, Scott Neal, and Don Black are facing the same issue.  I would appreciate your review and consideration of this matter.

Sincerely,

Phillip Allen


Andrew -

I just heard that you've been trying to reach me today with no success. I'm
actually sitting at a new desk and periodically checking my old voicemail
extension, but the best number to reach me on is (503) 464-3827.

Thanks,
Kate


Diane Seib is the contact person.

From: Tana Jones on 10/20/2000 01:42 PM CDT
To: Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Financial Confirms

I was just sitting here thinking, now that y'all are doing the financial
confirms up there, your Confirmation Desk people need to be on the
distribution list for our emails when we get signed masters in, so they know
when they need to change from a non-master style of confirm, to a master
style of confirm.  Who, pray tell, might your Confirmation Desk people be so
we can add them...


As requested.

 - memo for item 1 sep 11 2000.doc


We have scheduled the EWS mid-year PRC meeting to prerate VP's and to review the distribution of all groups below VP on July 10, 2001 (date is on your calendar).  Members of the committee will include Office of the Chairman from each EWS business unit, and MD's.   For EA, in addition to the two of you, we are proposing the following MD's attend:

Phillip Allen
Tim Belden
Chris Calger
Joe Deffner
Tim Detmering
Dave Duran
Joe Kishkell
Rob Milnthorp
Brian Redmond

Please confirm your agreement with the above list, or let me know of any changes.  I will then send out a notice to all.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks

Sheila

X36628


Guys, gas with a $5.00 handle is not a good thing for this deal - I know we
are pushing this restructuring as fast as we can; however, I think we need to
determine how to move this faster. Any ideas?

Regards
Delainey


If you brought an appetizer or dessert for our Thanksgiving Luncheon, please
bring it to 38C2 now so it can be set out.

Thanks,

Gloria Cruz
(for Twanda Sweet)


yep.

	Nancy Sellers <Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com>
	12/12/2000 11:52 AM

		 To: "'Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com'" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Directions

We plan to leave here about 3 - will someone be around to let us in the
house?
-----Original Message-----
From:   Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [SMTP:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent:   Monday, December 11, 2000 11:25 AM
To:     Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com
Subject:        Directions
Here's tel. number to the house.  And Star's coming to the party!  Check
for the wine's in the mail.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 12/11/2000 01:24 PM -----

                    Jeff
Dasovich
                    Sent by: Jeff        To:     Cameron Sellers
<cameron@perfect.com> @
                    Dasovich             ENRON, "Scott Laughlin"
<scottwl@hotmail.com> @
                                         ENRON,
psellers@Haas.Berkeley.EDU
                                         cc:

                    12/11/2000           Subject:
Directions
                    01:23
PM

Telephone number at the house is 415.868.1254.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 12/11/2000 01:22 PM -----

                    Jeff
Dasovich
                    Sent by: Jeff        To:     Cameron Sellers
<cameron@perfect.com> @
                    Dasovich             ENRON, "Scott Laughlin"
<scottwl@hotmail.com> @
                                         ENRON,
psellers@Haas.Berkeley.EDU
                                         cc:

                    12/11/2000           Subject:
Directions
                    01:02
PM

Can we do a little planning tonite for this weekend?

Cameron:
Here are the directions to the place in Stinson.  Can you email to your
invites?  Did you invite John E?
We have the place from 5 PM on Friday evening till 10 AM on Sunday morning.
Address:
11 Sonoma Patio
Stinson Beach
If you're coming from the City and take Panoramic over Mt. Tam, then when
you hit Highway One, make a right and head north toward town.  Go through
town and make a left on Calle del Arroyo.  If you see the lagoon on your
left, you've gone too far.  After making a left on Calle del Arroyo, make a
left on Sonoma.
If you're coming from points North, then you'll be heading south on Highway
One toward Stinson.  After you've passed the lagoon on your right, you'll
eventually come to Calle del Arroyo.  If you arrive in the town of Stinson
Beach, you've gone too far.  Make a right on Calle del Arroyo, then a left
on Sonoma.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

April 27, 2001 5:00pm through April 30, 2001 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.

ENRON CENTER SOUTH DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:  No Scheduled Outages.

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET: No Scheduled Outages.

MESSAGING: No Scheduled Outages.

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS:    ALSO SEE ORIGINAL REPORT
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 4/27/2001 at  6:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 4/27/2001 at  8:00:00 PM CT
 Fri 4/27/2001 at  4:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 4/27/2001 at  6:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 4/28/2001 at 12:00:00 AM London thru Sat 4/28/2001 at  2:00:00 AM London
Outage:  ClearCase Patch
Environments Impacted:  Corp
Purpose: This patch will resolve several issues involving the MVFS (ClearCase
file system.)
Backout: Remove the patch
Contact(s):  Troy Beyer  713.345.8316  713.406.1782

SITARA:  No Scheduled Outages.

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY:
Impact:
Time:  Sat 4/28/2001 at  9:00:00 AM CT thru Sat 4/28/2001 at  11:00:00 AM CT
 Sat 4/28/2001 at  7:00:00 AM PT thru Sat 4/28/2001 at    9:00:00 AM PT
 Sat 4/28/2001 at  3:00:00 PM London  thru Sat 4/28/2001 at  5:00:00 PM London
Outage:  ISDN Calling Name and Number
Environments Impacted:  All
Purpose: To allow for number and name to appear on telephone displays.  If
testing is successful,
permanent changes will be put into effect at a later date.  These will not be
service affecting.
Backout: Unbusy trunk group.
Contact(s):  Cynthia Siniard       713-853-0558
  Harold Williams      713-345-8917

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:        SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------

        FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center

Specific Help:
Information Risk Management   (713) 853-5536
SAP/ISC
        (713) 345-4727
Unify On-Call      (713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call     (713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS   (713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP    (713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR      (713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support      (713) 327-3893  [Pager]
EES Help Desk     (713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797


A "Doorstep" inspection of this business was performed in accordance with our
procedures and apparently this business is a disaster!!! We need immediate
action on this up to and including shutting it down. This was the worst we
have seen at Enron and I don't even want to put in this email what I heard
was going on there.

We need a coordinated solution here asap to avoid a real disaster, if there
isn't one already. I'll speak with Rick Causey here about what immediate
action we should take but the more you guys can dig into this the better.
More to come.

Rick


It appears that the following email may not have been clear.  You have to copy all documents yourself.

This is my cheat sheet if it helps:

H Drives:
1.  Each person will have to move any data over personally from the old H drive (which is now Z:) drive to their new H drive.
2. The Z: drive (old H:) will be removed from UBS employees on Thursday night.

O Drives:
1. For the old O or M drives go to O:\ESTATE\ O (or M ? pending location of data) and copy to the new common O.  The Estate O and M will be removed from UBS employees on Thursday night.

Do not delete anything and only copy information which is complies with the policy.  Please make sure that those people who are not in the office are contacted and comply.

Louise

To:		All Enron Employees Transferring to UBS Warburg Energy (or its affiliates)

Under the terms of the various agreements among certain Enron entities and UBS AG, certain Enron data and documents may be provided to UBS.  To ensure compliance with those agreements, Enron's document retention policy, as well as directives of various investigative agencies, the attached protocol regarding the process for migration of any information or data to UBS has been developed.

Please review the protocol carefully.  Then, complete the attached Certification and return it, with attachments, to Linda Guinn at EB 3829a no later than February 11, 2002.

Questions about this matter may be directed to Michelle Cash at (713) 853-6401 or Francisco Pinto-Leite at (713) 345-7942 .

Protocol Document and Data Copy Instructions

Certification Document


Hey,

I'm taking off for an hour, here are our positions. I have to run some
errands and will be back. I'm stopping at home too (403-245-1668). If no
problem, just email me the positions, or I'll be back before....

Ryan


I re-compiled Exotica.xll, so that the xcol function is a put on collar.

De-add in your Exotica. Add this special one. And use xcol for put.

Then delete the Exotica_xcol_putoncollar.xll

We will build in this functionality in near future.

Zimin

Paulo,

Can you add a flag to xcol function so that we can choose a put or call from
the
spreadsheet ?

Thanks.

Zimin


TODAY: We feature Deloitte Research chief economist Carl
Steidtmann, who responds to last week's column by Lawrence
Kudlow and disparages tax relief, plus Internet stocks making
a comeback, and research from Stephens Inc. and Dain Rauscher
Wessels.

========================= Advertisement =======================

Strike back against threats to your wealth and retirement.
We are now living in a permanently changed world. Investors are
in a battle they cannot afford to lose-a battle they cannot trust
analysts to "help" them win. ChangeWave 2.0 is your victory plan
for profiting in a radically changed world.
Get 3 FREE chapters of this new best-seller at:

http://www.changewave.com/b/10/oct6/
================================================================

FEATURED ARTICLES AND RESEARCH THIS WEEK INCLUDE:

1. BUY RATINGS: Fool me twice, shame on me
Amazon fights investor skepticism despite improvements down the line

2. BUCKING THE TREND: Internet stocks that keep rising
Three e-business stocks that defy the new conventional wisdom

3. ECONOMIC PROGRESSION: Tax facts and fantasy
The tech sector needs a tax cut like an overweight person needs a
Big Mac and fries.

4. TOP 10: Most recommended Internet stocks
This week's selection includes Intuit (INTU), AOL-Time Warner (AOL),
and Jack Henry & Associates (JKHY).

5. VENTURE CAPITAL: Don't believe the hype
Venture capitalists reshape their priorities

6. ADVERTORIAL: The real deal: survival kit
Investing for the end of the world

7. HOT REPORT: Is this just in time?
Dain Rauscher Wessels reviews three collaborative commerce software
stocks.

8. SPECIAL REPORT: Internet stock roundup
Dain Rauscher Wessels reviews earnings news and competitive
developments.

9. EDITOR'S PICK: Vertical Internet leaps
Stephens Inc. analyzes the impact of Internet adoption on select
industry verticals.

10. FREE SPONSORED REPORT: Morgan Stanley sets a $30 price target
on semiconductor designer Silicon Laboratories (SLAB).

========================= Advertisement =======================

"Trade stocks for $7 at Scottrade, a #1 Broker! Over 140 offices s
taffed with knowledgeable, personal brokers! Fast Executions!
NO Inactivity Fees! Account Protection! Click here and read why
Scottrade ranked #1 by KIPLINGER Personal Finance Magazine!"

http://www.scottrade.com/index.asp?supbid=4086

================================================================

Scroll down and click links below to go right to a specific article:

1. BUY RATINGS: Fool me twice, shame on me
Amazon fights investor skepticism despite improvements down the line

Contributing editor Shannon Swingle reports on what Amazon has done
lately, why some analysts think it might be time to consider Amazon's
investment potential, and how the granddaddy of e-commerce compares
to online auction king eBay.
Click here.
http://www.theinternetanalyst.com/Analysts/ArticleTIA.asp?ForumID=39&DocID=3521

2. BUCKING THE TREND: Internet stocks that keep rising
Three e-business stocks that defy the new conventional wisdom

The right business model just might allow Web-based companies to
use the Internet as a trampoline with which to vault over their
bricks-and-mortar competition, and equity research columnist Dave
Sterman discovers why analysts are touting three such stocks.
Click here.
http://www.theinternetanalyst.com/Analysts/ArticleTIA.asp?ForumID=39&DocID=3591

3. ECONOMIC PROGRESSION: Tax facts and fantasy
The tech sector needs a tax cut like an overweight person needs a
Big Mac and fries.

According to Carl Steidtmann, chief economist at Deloitte Research,
"No amount of tax incentives or Fed easing is going to create a
pickup in high tech investment." He repudiates Lawrence Kudlow's
article and proposes an innovative solution of his own.
Click here.
http://www.theinternetanalyst.com/Analysts/ArticleTIA.asp?ForumID=39&DocID=3589

========================= Advertisement =======================

It's here! The Multex Investor Toolbar
Now you can get broker research, quotes, charts and company
information from anywhere on the Web.

http://www.athoc.com/wis/activate/activate.asp?pid=10279&mktmsg=JA1

================================================================

4. TOP 10: Most recommended Internet stocks
This week's selection includes Intuit (INTU), AOL-Time Warner (AOL),
and Jack Henry & Associates (JKHY).

Presenting the latest valuation and analyst recommendation data from
Multex's proprietary stock-screening tool applied to the universe of
The Internet Analyst stocks. See tables sorting the top 10 stocks
according to the highest average recommendation.
Click here.
http://www.theinternetanalyst.com/Analysts/ArticleTIA.asp?ForumID=39&DocID=1580

5. VENTURE CAPITAL: Don't believe the hype
Venture capitalists reshape their priorities

Equity research columnist Dave Sterman reports on the lessons that
VC firms have learned from their past errors. According to a survey
conducted by Vega Consultants, tall talking is out and strong
management teams are in.
Click here.
http://www.theinternetanalyst.com/Analysts/ArticleTIA.asp?ForumID=39&DocID=3536

6. ADVERTORIAL: The real deal: survival kit
Investing for the end of the world

Charles Payne, Founder, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Analyst,
Wall Street Strategies, paints a hypothetical investment scenario
for a hypothetical Apocalypse, and runs down the list of his
favorite picks among the survivalist's checklist of staples.
Click here.
http://www.theinternetanalyst.com/Analysts/ArticleTIA.asp?ForumID=39&DocID=3605

7. HOT REPORT: Is this just in time?
Dain Rauscher Wessels reviews three collaborative commerce software
stocks.

The firm urges investors to take "a more constructive view" of the
Web-based B2B sector and reviews i2 Technologies (ITWO), Retek
(RETK), and SAP (SAP), which have "rebounded nicely" despite poor
business fundamentals. (2-page report for purchase - $10)
Click here.
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=25189629

8. SPECIAL REPORT: Internet stock roundup
Dain Rauscher Wessels reviews earnings news and competitive
developments.

The firm analyzes scores of stocks, a dozen of which are exposed
to the Internet sector, including BEA Systems (BEAS), PeopleSoft
(PSFT), Watchguard Technologies (WGRD), SAP (SAP), Oracle (ORCL),
and Microsoft (MSFT). (21-page report for purchase - $75)
Click here.
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=25230547

9. EDITOR'S PICK: Vertical Internet leaps
Stephens Inc. analyzes the impact of Internet adoption on select
industry verticals.

The firm notes accelerated adoption of Web-based technologies in
healthcare as part of an effort to streamline financial processes,
investigates stocks in five industry verticals and initiates
coverage of three Web stocks. (84-page report for purchase - $150)
Click here.
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=25149993

10. FREE SPONSORED REPORT: Morgan Stanley sets a $30 price target
on semiconductor designer Silicon Laboratories (SLAB).

The firm says SLAB "could become one of the most exciting stocks"
in the industry and that "new product revenue growth" will drive
the stock price higher. Register for the firm's free-research
trial to access research on this "strong buy" rated stock.
Click here.
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=4379423&sid=8

================================================================

Click here to register at Multex Investor:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/registration/regWrapA1Basic.asp

Click here for The Internet Analyst homepage:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/Analysts/HomeTIA.asp

If you'd like to learn more about Multex Investor, please visit:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/welcome.asp

If you can't remember your password and/or your user name, click here:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/lostinfo.asp

If you want to update your email address, please click on the url below:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/edituinfo.asp

================================================================
To remove yourself from this mailing list, please REPLY to THIS
email message with the word UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line. To
remove yourself from ALL Multex Investor mailings, including the
Daily Update and The Internet Analyst, please respond with the
words NO EMAIL in the subject line.

You may also unsubscribe on the account update page at:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/edituinfo.asp

Please email your feedback to The Internet Analyst, include TIA in
the subject line at:
investor.feedback@multex.com

Please send your questions and comments to:
investor.help@multex.com

Please email advertising inquiries to us at:
advertise@multex.com

Like a specific article? Now you can send it to a friend with just
a click. Check out the send to a friend feature next to each article.

To advertise in this e-mail, ASK FOR TIA at:
advertise@multex.com


any word on the supreme court ruling?  I figure that ought to add $5 to the
stock price instantly, if it comes out right.  df


---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 01/11/2001
11:18 AM ---------------------------
From: Brian Bierbach@ENRON on 01/11/2001 09:14 AM MST
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: End of Year Bonus

--  PLEASE DISREGARD IF YOU RECEIVED AN E-MAIL FROM ME ON 1-9-01 (I was
having trouble with the network in Houston)

Dave,

The attached spreadsheet outlines my recommendations on proposed changes to
the bonus distribution.

In regard to my expectations, I am expecting a significant increase from last
years bonus for the following reason.

It was my strategic decision to:
pursue the asset development business in conjunction with other business
lines (made and received approval to hire the necessary people and execute
the strategy from Kevin Hannon).
close both Wind and Powder projects simultaneously versus only focus on the
Powder River Project (know one thought that both could get done in a 7 week
time frame. At the risk of not being able to get either closed, I went out on
the limb and sent Whitt to negotiate and close Wind River ($72 MM) while I
negotiated and closed Powder River ($75 MM).
it was my idea to create Enron Midstream Services and develop a gathering
business in the Powder. That decision enable us to hedge our firm transport
decision on Fort Union and enabled us to receive $54 million for the sale of
the business
I made the  call and initiated the joint bid between Northern Border and ENA
to acquire a combined 49% interest in Bighorn Gas Gathering.  We sold our
interest to NBP for $22 MM
I initiated the discussions, structured the transaction, negotiated the value
and closed Project 20/20 with NBP.  There was a point in the negotiations
where it was known that I was going with NBP and therefore had to take a
neutral position.  However, by that time, the value had been established and
many contentious issues regarding valuation had been agreed upon
it was my call to preserve value in the transaction and have myself and a
team of 12 others go over to NBP versus have them deduct the cost associated
with a Management Services Agreement from the purchase price.  This saved ENA
over $20 MM in value.  Needless to say, we are now having to deal with
managing a highly aggressive budget and adjust to a very different management
style and compensation plan. I feel personally that ENA was the primary
beneficiary of the higher valuation.  As you can appreciate, I have a
personal issue with this and would like this to be considered for bonus
determination.

In general, I think Project 20/20 was just part of my contribution to ENA
during my tenure in Denver.  In total, this office has generated in excess of
$150 million in earnings with no remaining risk potential.  I have been
fortunate to have hired a solid team that approached many of the projects we
worked on in a team manner.  I think that approach has been successful and I
am hopeful that major contributors on the team will be compensated
appropriately.

I appreciate your consideration Dave!  Please let me know if you have any
questions or thoughts regarding this e-mail.

Brian


Just a reminder:

		YOUR TIME ENTRY IS DUE.

		If you have log-in problems call the Integrated Solutions Center at 713-345-4727.


Need any further proof that California is destined to slide off into the sea?

From: Jeff Dasovich on 12/13/2000 01:31 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: skean@enron.com, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher F
Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, mpalmer@enron.com, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mona L
Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Jennifer Rudolph/HOU/EES@EES, Jeffery
Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Neil
Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron,
Martin Wenzel/SFO/HOU/EES@EES, Douglas Condon/SFO/EES@EES, David
Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Laird Dyer/SF/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: FYI-Edison wants Reregulation

----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 12/13/2000 01:29 PM -----

	"Katie Kaplan" <kaplan@iepa.com>
	12/13/2000 01:23 PM
	Please respond to kaplan

		 To: "Douglas Kerner" <DKK@eslawfirm.com>, "Andy Brown" <ABB@eslawfirm.com>,
"B Brown Andy" <andybrwn@earthlink.net>, "Bob Weisenmiller"
<rbw@mrwassoc.com>, "Jan Smutny-Jones" <smutny@iepa.com>, "Jean Munoz"
<jmunoz@mcnallytemple.com>, "Jeff Dasovich" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>, "John
Stout" <John_H_Stout@reliantenergy.com>, "Julee Malinowski-Ball"
<jmball@ns.net>, "Karen Edson" <kedson@ns.net>, "Kassandra Gough"
<kgough@calpine.com>, "kent Palmerton" <kent.palmerton@williams.com>,
"Kristin Vellandi" <kvellandi@pstrategies.com>, "Marty Wilson"
<mwilson@pstrategies.com>, "McNally Ray" <rmcnally@mcnallytemple.com>,
"Norton Kelli" <knorton@mcnallytemple.com>, "Paula Hall-Collins"
<paula.hall-collins@williams.com>, "Richard Hyde" <rwhyde@duke-energy.com>,
"Stephanie-Newell" <stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "Sue Mara"
<smara@enron.com>, "Tom Ross" <tross@mcnallytemple.com>, "Kate Castillo"
<ccastillo@riobravo-gm.com>, "Bill Carlson" <wcarlson@wm.com>, "Bill Woods"
<billw@calpine.com>, "Bob Escalante" <rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "Carolyn
Baker" <cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "Cody Carter" <cody.carter@williams.com>,
"Curt Hatton" <curt.hatton@gen.pge.com>, "Curtis Kebler"
<curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "Dave Parquet" <dparque@ect.enron.com>,
"Dean Gosselin" <dean_gosselin@fpl.com>, "Duane Nelsen"
<dnelsen@gwfpower.com>, "Ed Tomeo" <ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>, "Eileen Koch"
<eileenk@calpine.com>, "Eric Eisenman" <eric.eisenman@neg.pge.com>, "Frank
DeRosa" <frank.derosa@gen.pge.com>, "Greg Blue" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "Hap Boyd"
<hap.boyd@enron.com>, "Jack Pigott" <jackp@calpine.com>, "Jeff Dasovich"
<jdasovic@enron.com>, "Jim Willey" <elliottsa@earthlink.net>, "Joe Greco"
<joe.greco@uaecorp.com>, "Joe Ronan" <joer@calpine.com>, "Jonathan Weisgall"
<jweisgall@aol.com>, "Ken Hoffman" <khoffman@caithnessenergy.com>, "Kent
Fickett" <kfickett@usgen.com>, "Lynn Lednicky" <lale@dynegy.com>, "Marty
McFadden" <marty_mcfadden@ogden-energy.com>, "Paula Soos"
<paula_soos@ogden-energy.com>, "Randy Hickok" <rjhickok@duke-energy.com>,
"Rob Lamkin" <rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, "Roger Pelote"
<roger.pelote@williams.com>, "Scott Noll" <snoll@thermoecotek.com>, "Steve
Iliff" <siliff@riobravo-gm.com>, "Steve Ponder" <steve_ponder@fpl.com>,
"Susan J Mara" <Susan_J_Mara@enron.com>, "Tony Wetzel"
<twetzel@thermoecotek.com>, "Trond Aschehoug" <taschehoug@thermoecotek.com>,
"William Hall" <wfhall2@duke-energy.com>, <kaplan@iepa.com>
		 cc: "Karen Edson" <kedson@ns.net>, "Julee Malinowski-Ball" <jmball@ns.net>,
"Douglas Kerner" <DKK@eslawfirm.com>, "B Brown Andy"
<andybrwn@earthlink.net>, "Andy Brown" <ABB@eslawfirm.com>, "Jan
Smutny-Jones" <smutny@iepa.com>, "Steven Kelly" <steven@iepa.com>
		 Subject: FYI-Edison wants Reregulation

DJ Edison To Call For End To Calif Elec
                  Dereg Wed -Sources

                  Copyright (c) 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

                  LOS ANGELES (Dow Jones)--Edison International (EIX),
saying the current state of
                  California's power markets threatens the company with
bankruptcy, will call Wednesday
                  for an end to California's four-year experiment with
deregulation, sources familiar with
                  the issue told Dow Jones Newswires.

                       John Bryson, chief executive of Edison International,
is expected to announce that
                  the company's regulated utility unit, Southern California
Edison, won't be able to
                  recover more than $3 billion in losses related to power
purchases and continue serving
                  its retail customers unless the state's deregulated market
structure is scrapped.

                       In a move tantamount to a call for reregulation,
Edison will propose to break ground
                  on new power plants within 90 days and re-enter the
power-generation business
                  Southern California Edison was required to exit under the
state's landmark 1996
                  deregulation law, the sources said.

                       Edison plans to follow the announcement by filing a
request with state regulators to
                  increase retail electricity rates by as much as 20%, the
sources said, even though
                  regulators rejected Edison's request for a rate increase
of 10% last week.

                       The utility has lined up the support of some state
lawmakers for the broader
                  proposal, which would require action by the state
legislature, the sources said.

                       Southern California Edison, with 4.2 million
customers, is one of the country's largest
                  electric utilities. Edison was the first of the state's
utilities to sign on to the deregulation
                  effort and, as it says on its Web site, "played a central
role in the restructuring of the
                  electric industry in California."

                       Among the concessions won by utilities in 1996 is the
rate freeze, which they
                  demanded to help them recover costs related to
deregulation but which is now
                  producing huge losses.

                       Edison's current losses stem from an imbalance
between the soaring prices it must
                  pay to purchase power on the wholesale markets and the
fixed rate at which it can sell
                  power to its customers.

                       About half of those losses are offset the utility's
own power sales revenues, which
                  are accounted for separately and used to pay down
deregulation-related debt. Rising
                  power costs have produced a surplus in that account.
Edison wouldn't reveal the
                  current size of the surplus, but said previously that the
California Power Exchange paid
                  the utility $1.3 billion over its generating costs for
power through the end of September,
                  at a time when its power-purchase losses were $2.4
billion.

                       Power-Purchase Losses Mounting

                       The net losses continue to mount. California's
wholesale power prices hovered at
                  record levels all summer and spiked even higher in the
past two weeks, as colder
                  weather arrived in the Northwest at a time when much of
California's power supply was
                  down for maintenance.

                       The price of power for delivery Wednesday in
California hit an average of $1,182 a
                  megawatt-hour Tuesday, up from $250 a megawatt-hour a week
ago, the result of high
                  demand and a decision by California's wholesale market
operator to lift its cap on prices.

                       The rate Southern California Edison can charge its
retail customers, however, is fixed
                  at $66/MWh.

                       Last week, Merrill Lynch & Co. (MER) downgraded its
ratings for Edison
                  International and PG&E Corp. (PCG), the parent of
California's other major utility, Pacific
                  Gas & Electric, to neutral, saying the utilities may be
forced to file for bankruptcy if the
                  state doesn't allow them to raise their retail rates.

                       A Morgan Stanley Dean Witter (MDW) analyst drew the
same conclusion Monday,
                  also cutting his rating to neutral.

                       Edison to this point has kept its power-purchase
losses off its earnings statement, in
                  hopes that a political or regulatory solution will allow
them to be collected later.

                       The California Public Utilities Commission put the
hope of such a solution further out
                  of reach last week, however, when it ruled against rate
increases sought by Edison and
                  PG&E.

                       Credit rating agency Fitch Inc. on Monday lowered its
ratings for Edison
                  International and Southern California Edison's senior
unsecured debt to the A-minus
                  level, citing "increased liquidity pressure" and
uncertainty about the utilities' ability to
                  recover the costs of their power purchases. The agency
downgraded Edison
                  International, the parent, because half its consolidated
cash flow is provided by
                  Southern California Edison.

                       Edison - which sources said plans to remain in the
retail electricity business - said
                  late last week that it has secured a $1 billion line of
credit and expects to have enough
                  cash on hand to continue to pay for wholesale electricity
for the next several months.

                       California paid more than $1 billion for power last
week, sources said. Some of that,
                  however, was paid to Southern California Edison, which
still generates about 2,800
                  megawatts of power in the state.

                       Shares in Edison International have fallen 21% over
the past three weeks. They
                  closed Wednesday at $18.56, down $0.06.

                       -By Jason Leopold, Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3874;
                  mailto:jason.leopold@dowjones.com(Mark Golden contributed
to this article.)

Katie Kaplan
Manager of State Policy Affairs
Independent Energy Producers Association
(916) 448-9499

-----Original Message-----
From: Katie Kaplan [mailto:kaplan@iepa.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 10:50 AM
To: William Hall; Trond Aschehoug; Tony Wetzel; Susan J Mara; Steve Ponder;
Steve Iliff; Scott Noll; Roger Pelote; Rob Lamkin; Randy Hickok; Paula Soos;
Marty McFadden; Lynn Lednicky; Kent Fickett; Ken Hoffman; Jonathan Weisgall;
Joe Ronan; Joe Greco; Jim Willey; Jeff Dasovich; Jack Pigott; Hap Boyd; Greg
Blue; Frank DeRosa; Eric Eisenman; Eileen Koch; Ed Tomeo; Duane Nelsen; Dean
Gosselin; Dave Parquet; Curtis Kebler; Curt Hatton; Cody Carter; Carolyn
Baker; Bob Escalante; Bill Woods; Bill Carlson; Kate Castillo; Pigott Jack;
Tom Ross; Sue Mara; Stephanie-Newell; Richard Hyde; Paula Hall-Collins;
Norton Kelli; McNally Ray; Marty Wilson; Kristin Vellandi; kent Palmerton;
Katie Kaplan; Kassandra Gough; Karen Edson; Julee Malinowski-Ball; John
Stout; Jeff Dasovich; Jean Munoz; Jan Smutny-Jones; Bob Weisenmiller; B
Brown Andy; Andy Brown; Douglas Kerner
Cc: Douglas Kerner; Julee Malinowski-Ball; Karen Edson; Andy Brown; B Brown
Andy
Subject: FYI-Edison wants back in the generation business

Edison Mission Energy Power Project Starts Construction After Expedited
Approval By California Energy Commission

 Monday December 11 6:39pm
 Source: Dow Jones

 Operation Targeted for August

 IRVINE, Calif., Dec. 11 /PRNewswire/ -- Edison Mission Energy (EME), an
Edison International company (NYSE: EIX), started construction of its new
 Sunrise power plant on Thursday, December 7, having received expedited
approval from the California Energy Commission (CEC) to proceed. The
 power generation facility will be located in Kern County, California, and
will bring both short- and long-term generation capacity to the state, which
is in
 dire need of new power generation.

 "From the onset of the California power crisis, we have sought to find
means to bring new power to the California market," said John E. Bryson,
 chairman and CEO of Edison International. "This CEC approval will help
ensure that this critical new project will be able to provide a significant
amount
 of new peaking power to the state as soon as next August. Our thanks and
appreciation go to the California Energy Commission, and the
 environmental and regulatory agencies for their swift consideration of this
important project."

 "This power has been offered by contract to the state so that the pricing
for it does not depend on California's broken deregulated power market,"
said
 Alan J. Fohrer, president and CEO of EME. "Alternatively, EME will seek to
enter into a long-term, cost-based contract with either Pacific Gas &
 Electric Company or San Diego Gas & Electric Company to further ensure that
California's consumers reap the benefit of this additional power
 resource," Fohrer said.

 The Sunrise Power Project will be completed in two phases. Phase 1 will
consist of a 320-megawatt (MW), simple-cycle peaking facility scheduled to
 be in service during the summer 2001. Phase 2 will convert the peaking
facility to a 560-MW, combined-cycle operation with an in-service date of
 summer 2003. The project will meet or exceed all pertinent environmental
and safety standards.

 Final regulatory approvals have been received for Phase I of the project
only.

 EME will be seeking expedited permitting approval for the Phase II
expansion in line with the fast-track approval process recently enacted by
the
 California legislature.

 EME has also negotiated an agreement with the labor unions for an adequate
supply of highly skilled labor in order to achieve an accelerated
 construction schedule. The accelerated schedule is aimed at providing this
additional power to California by next summer.

 Edison Mission Energy specializes in the development, acquisition,
construction management and operation of global power production facilities.
As
 one of the world's leading global power producers, Edison Mission Energy
owns nearly 23,000 megawatts of generating capacity, including interests in
 75 projects currently under construction or operating in Australia,
Indonesia, Italy, New Zealand, Puerto Rico, Spain, Thailand, Turkey, the
United
 Kingdom and the United States.

 Based in Rosemead, Calif., Edison International is a premier international
electric power generator, distributor and structured finance provider. With
a
 portfolio of approximately 28,000 megawatts, Edison International is an
industry leader in privatized, deregulated and incentive-regulated markets
and
 power generation. It is the parent company of Edison Mission Energy,
Southern California Edison, Edison Capita, Edison Enterprises and Edison
 O&M Services.

 /CONTACT: Kevin Kelley of Edison Mission Energy, 626-302-1033, Fax,
626-302-7827/ 21:35 EST

Katie Kaplan
Manager of State Policy Affairs
Independent Energy Producers Association
(916) 448-9499


remove me from your email list

Shirley Sklar <shirley.sklar@idrc.org> on 03/15/2001 01:13:13 PM
To: stshouston@mailman.enron.com
cc: Ed Jarboe <ed.jarboe@idrc.org>, Shirley Sklar <shirley.sklar@idrc.org>
Subject: Attached Invitation from IDRC Houston Chapter

Attached is an invitation from the IDRC Houston Chapter.

The following section of this message contains a file attachment
prepared for transmission using the Internet MIME message format.
If you are using Pegasus Mail, or any another MIME-compliant system,
you should be able to save it or view it from within your mailer.
If you cannot, please ask your system administrator for assistance.

   ---- File information -----------
     File:  HOUSTON41001.doc
     Date:  15 Mar 2001, 13:59
     Size:  71680 bytes.
     Type:  Unknown

 - HOUSTON41001.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 03/28/2001
12:00 PM ---------------------------

"Ryan Lee" <ralee@rmi.net> on 03/27/2001 05:39:29 PM
To: "Ted Leighty" <tedleighty@yahoo.com>, "Pedar Kjesth"
<pederleifkjeseth@hotmail.com>, <merlinm@uswest.net>,
<matthew.lenhart@enron.com>, "JAKE Istnick" <jakeistnick@hotmail.com>, "David
Shaw" <davidishaw@yahoo.com>, <danielkbrock@hotmail.com>, "Claude.Aldridge"
<Claude.Aldridge@yellowglobal.com>, "Chris Tuttle" <cbtuttle@hotmail.com>,
"Brian Beggs" <brbeggs@hotmail.com>, "Ben Abendroth" <bda76@yahoo.com>,
"Bagby, Joel" <jbagby@caprock.com>, "Andy Patton" <andy.patton@wcom.com>
cc:

Subject: Fw: What We've Learned From Watching Porn......

SO TRUE!!
?
----- Original Message -----
From: Lee, Ryan
To: 'ralee@rmi.net'
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 3:55 PM
Subject: FW: What We've Learned From Watching Porn......

?
-----Original Message-----
From: Williams, Zach
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 3:39 PM
To: Lee,  Ryan
Subject: FW: What We've Learned From Watching Porn......

?
?
Message-ID: <F174Ba1kg3AmsfGdMNF00001bcb@hotmail.com>
From: Steve Renz <steverenz@hotmail.com>
To: salwolf93@yahoo.com, jamesadamic@hotmail.com, johnbucklar@hotmail.com,
cdolan17@hotmail.com, Banjoglass@hotmail.com, joegregg@earthlink.net,
mjmorty@hotmail.com, lakerob@yahoo.com, MWright4u@aol.com
Subject: Fwd: What I've Learned From Watching Porn
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 13:21:05 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_003_01C0B711.156EBDC0"

----Original Message Follows----
From: "Brett Beezley" <b_beezley@hotmail.com>
To: ALBOULWARE@YAHOO.COM, matha@kumc.edu, TOBLOOMER@YAHOO.COM,
briancboukalik@eaton.com, BRANTPETERSON@HOTMAIL.COM,
Aaron_Brinkman@na.dole.com, bej2147@hotmail.com, PDT2139@aol.com,
cpete26689@aol.com, alexgfranz@hotmail.com, ajennings2@yahoo.com,
jeremiahdavis@teleline.es, JOHNNYWARREN98@YAHOO.COM, mkopes@yahoo.com,
kkrehbiel@kumc.edu, NWARREN48@YAHOO.COM, MTAYLOR7@KC.RR.COM,
steverenz@hotmail.com, forth23@hotmail.com, lakerob@yahoo.com,
mikedrussell@hotmail.com, TRENTMARQUARDT@HOTMAIL.COM,
treyprice_2000@yahoo.com, tennistucker@aol.com, ryan.vanhorn@labone.com,
rossvogel@birch.net, wyatt_22311@yahoo.com
Subject: Fwd: What I've Learned From Watching Porn
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 13:08:16 -0600

>From: "Jacob Reimer" <jrjhawk@hotmail.com>
>To: jcoffin@ukans.edu, pmcgiffert@hotmail.com, b_beezley@hotmail.com,
>bherrman@eagle.cc.ukans.edu, dardots@aol.com, jgarner77@hotmail.com,
>gizz1dmb@hotmail.com, urdaddy15@hotmail.com, bhagman30@hotmail.com,
>rhymus@aol.com, mcmahonsean@hotmail.com, snewcs@yahoo.com,
>mike_newhouse@hotmail.com, peter.crump@escout.com, kpolian@echelontech.com,
>psak19@hotmail.com, chacer@eagle.cc.ukans.edu, rjwoody@eagle.cc.ukans.edu,
>franksciara@hotmail.com, johnny@genesishealthclub.com,
>tavis.crump@valrad.com, tmcasc1925@aol.com
>Subject: Fwd: What I've Learned From Watching Porn
>Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 12:52:05 -0600
>
>
>
>
>>From: "Robert Fanelli" <fanelli44@hotmail.com>
>>To: mfanelli@twcny.rr.com, jbarryiipoops@hotmail.com,
>>gizz1dmb@hotmail.com, roepanimal@hotmail.com, jrjhawk@hotmail.com,
>>drc@hotmail.com, jake50k@myvzw.com, billymags@hotmail.com,
>>jtv5407@hotmail.com, melissawilbur@hotmail.com, Timmit1971@hotmail.com
>>Subject: What I've Learned From Watching Porn
>>Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 10:06:47 -0500
>>
>>What I've Learned From Watching Porn
>>
>>1.? Women wear high heels to bed.
>>2.? Men are never impotent.
>>3.? When going down on a woman 10 seconds is more than satisfactory.
>>4.? If a woman gets busted masturbating by a strange man, she will not
>>??? scream with embarrassment, but rather insist he have sex with her.
>>5.Women smile appreciatively when men splat them in the face with sperm.
>>6.? Women enjoy having sex with ugly, middle-aged men.
>>7.? Women moan uncontrollably when giving a blowjob.
>>8.? Women always orgasm when men do.
>>9.? A blowjob will always get a woman off a speeding ticket.
>>10. All women are noisy fucks.
>>11. People in the 70's couldn't fuck unless there was a wild guitar solo
>>??? in the background.
>>12. Those tits are real.
>>13. A common and enjoyable sexual practice for a man is to take his
>>??? half-erect penis and slap it repeatedly on a woman's butt.
>>14. Men always groan "OH YEAH!" when they cum.
>>15. If there is two of them they "high five" each other.(and the girl
>>??? isn't disgusted!)
>>16. Double penetration makes women smile.
>>17. Asian men don't exist.
>>18. If you come across a guy and his girlfriend having sex in the
>>??? bushes, the boyfriend won't bash seven shades of shit out of you
>>??? if you shove your cock in his girlfriend's mouth.
>>19. There's a plot.
>>20. When taking a woman from behind, a man can really excite a woman by
>>??? giving her a gentle slap on the butt.
>>21. Nurses suck patient's cocks.
>>22. Men always pull out.
>>23. When your girlfriend busts you getting head from her best friend,
>>??? she'll only be momentarily pissed off before fucking the both of
>>??? you.
>>24. Women never have headaches... or periods.
>>25. When a woman is sucking a man's cock, it's important for him to
>>??? remind her to "suck it".
>>26. Assholes are clean.
>>27. A man ejaculating on a woman's butt is a satisfying result for all
>>??? parties concerned.
>>28. Women always look pleasantly surprised when they open a man's
>>??? trousers and find a cock there.
>>29. Men don't have to beg.
>>30. When standing during a blowjob, a man will always place one hand
>>??? firmly on the back of the kneeling woman's head and the other
>>??? proudly on his hip
>>
>>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


Info on generating plants in cal and southwest

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hyatt, Kevin
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 3:01 PM
To:	Harris, Steven; Donoho, Lindy; Geaccone, Tracy; Hayslett, Rod
Subject:	WSCC Power AZNMNV.xls

attached is the info for JP Morgan.  Let me know if you have questions.
kh


---------------------- Forwarded by David Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
04/13/2000 09:25 AM ---------------------------

David Minns
04/13/2000 08:50 AM
To: Raymond Yeow/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Paul Quilkey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mark Tawney@ECT, Heidi
Mason/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Allan
Ford/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Paul
Smith/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Re: About to trade Weather on Thursday

Raymond can we discuss.

(a) This is definitely a possibility. We could back the trade out to EAF
through an ISDA Agreement we have with RMT (an Enron company based in
Houston).
(b) This is also an alternative from an Australian regulatory perspective.
(c)  Conceptually no reason why not except EAF  has no underlying ISDA
Agreement with SG USA. Also I suspect this would be less tax effective than
either one or two.
(d) Another alternative - We have an ISDA Agreement between EAF and SG
Australia Ltd . Could these entities be the contracting parties?

Raymond it is really a tax call as to which is the most effective contracting
structure. I have copies in Susan Musch (our Houston based tax expert). Susan
have you any ideas. I suspect also there will be some Enron management
determinations as to the identity of the Enron entity entering into the
trade.

One other point Raymond if ENA is the contracting party it really is outside
my jurisdiction. I would request  Sara Stackleton (who recently assumed took
overe from Shari Shackleton) assist.

Raymond Yeow
04/13/2000 08:24 AM
To: David Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Paul Quilkey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mark Tawney@ECT, Heidi
Mason/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Allan
Ford/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Paul
Smith/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: About to trade Weather on Thursday

Dear David,

We are about to do a weather trade with SocGen or Aquila on Melbourne
temperature
Expected trade date is Thursday - 13 April.
Steven Vu, Head Weather trader in Houston will transact with above thru a
broker in US.

Premium approx 700k AUD.

What is the best way in terms of regulations and tax - assume limits in place
!
Houston is to take a  portion of the deal too.

(a) ENA trades with SG USA, then back to back transact between ENA & En Aust ?

(b) ENA trades with SG USA, then gives p&L to  En Aust ?
can this P&L be real income or shadow only ?

(c) En Aust trades with SG Usa ( thru Oz arm of US broker or thru US broker)

or any other suggestions ???

Pls revert :o)
Thx,  Raymond
12 April