Scott--The volumes delivered into Central Hudson off Iroquois for Arma
Textiles
was included in Exhibit 1 of the 12/99 Energy Purchase Agreement such that it
would appear that Enron would be supplying this gas to CES.   However, the gas
to supply Arma was already purchased from Duke Energy, and as far as I can
tell, Enron has had nothing to do with delivering this gas, and Duke Energy
has
billed us directly for the gas that they supply each month.

I discussed this with Chris Germany, and we agreed that CES would just deal
directly with Duke Energy on this and leave Enron out of it.    Accordingly,
if
you look at the May'00 first-of-the-month request that I sent to Enron on
April
24, the table does show 135 dth/day into Central Hudson off Iroquois.
However,
the table notes that this gas is being supplied by Duke Energy and therefore
no
volumes are being requested from Enron.

Please let me know if this needs further action or clarification.

Thanks.

Scott.Goodell@enron.com on 04/28/2000 08:30:26 AM
Please respond to Scott.Goodell@enron.com

To: Scott McCain/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS, Doug
Kinney/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS
cc:

Subject: Re: Arma Textiles

Doug - Per a conversation with Chris, he says this remained with CES.  Can
you comment?
Scott
---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron on 04/28/2000
07:24 AM ---------------------------

smccain@columbiaenergygroup.com on 04/28/2000 05:31:46 AM

To:   " - *Scott.Goodell@enron.com" <Scott.Goodell@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:  Re: Arma Textiles

According to GMS, Doug purchased the gas. The period was from Feb'00 -
May'00.
The supplier was Duke. The contract was assigned to Enron.

Scott

Scott.Goodell@enron.com on 04/27/2000 06:31:31 PM
Please respond to Scott.Goodell@enron.com

To: Scott McCain/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS
cc:
Subject: Re: Arma Textiles

check with Donna or Doug. To my knowledge, ENA did not receive these deals.
Scott

smccain@columbiaenergygroup.com on 04/26/2000 10:26:31 AM

To:   " - *scott.goodell@enron.com" <scott.goodell@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:  Re: Arma Textiles

Scott,

 Arma Textiles is served by Cental Hudson.

Scott
---------------------- Forwarded by Scott McCain/CES/ColumbiaGas on
04/26/2000
11:25 AM ---------------------------
From: Kim Novsek Bizik on 04/26/2000 09:40 AM

To: Scott McCain/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc:
Subject: Re: Arma Textiles

Enron is probably not familiar with the deal as they did not have to make
any
nominations.  Although, the deal was documented each month on the memos and
spreadsheets that were sent to Enron.  I do not have a contact at Duke.  It
was
my understanding that both parties (Duke and Arma) knew the deal was a
fixed
quantity.

Scott McCain
04/26/2000 09:34 AM

To: Kim Novsek Bizik/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc:
Subject: Re: Arma Textiles

Kim,

 I spoke to Enron concerning the Duke supply agreement. Thye weere not
familiar with it. Do you have a contact @ Duke? Also, do you know if they
agreement is a full requirements or fixed quantity?

Thanks,

Scott

From: Kim Novsek Bizik on 04/26/2000 09:06 AM

To: Scott McCain/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc:
Subject: Re: Arma Textiles

good question....gotta get back to ya

Scott McCain
04/26/2000 08:28 AM

To: Kim Novsek Bizik/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc:
Subject: Re: Arma Textiles

What hurts worse, you body or losing your favorite truck?

Scott

From: Kim Novsek Bizik on 04/26/2000 08:00 AM

To: Scott McCain/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc:
Subject: Re: Arma Textiles

Just a few left and a torn intercoastal muscle. (kinda painful)  Thanks for
asking.  Be careful out there with those big truckers.

Scott McCain
04/26/2000 06:34 AM

To: Kim Novsek Bizik/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc:
Subject: Re: Arma Textiles

Thanks. How is the recovery process coming? Are the bumps & bruises gone?

Scott

From: Kim Novsek Bizik on 04/25/2000 04:23 PM

To: Scott McCain/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc: Elden Condie/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Richard
Contos/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
Subject: Re: Arma Textiles

When I was assigned Central Hudson in January I was told that there was one
customer behind the gate and that was Arma Textiles.  Arma was backed 100%
by a
Duke purchase that subseqently went with the Enron sale.  I was informed by
the
previous scheduler that all CES did was to make the nomination based on GMS
at
bidweek.   It was a stand alone deal that CES nominated based on GMS.

Scott McCain
04/25/2000 11:04 AM

To: Kim Novsek Bizik/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc: Elden Condie/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Richard
Contos/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
Subject: Arma Textiles

Kim,

 I am in the process of assigning this customer to a new marketer. A
review of the file shows a recent correspondence concerning tariff gas
purchased by Arma between Kurt Marburger & Charlie Dalphon. Are you able to
shed any light on the issue? There is a significant outstanding balance and
I
believe the customer has made the decision to stop payment until credits
are
issued for the tariff charges.

 Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Scott


Thanks, we are in bounds for the moment.  Rick


The North American Electric Reliability Council (NERC)  asks House Speaker to
act on electric reliability. NERC has written a letter to Speaker of the
House Dennis Hastert urging his support for passage of legislation this
congressional session to promote reliability of the electric power grid.

Anger over pricey power in San Diego key to House race.  The soaring bills
for electricity that have been showing up in the mail boxes of southern
Californians are expected to influence the November ballot boxes in a tight
race that pits Republican Representative Brian Bilbray against a Democratic
challenger.

N.H. Electric Deregulation Clears Last Major Hurdle. The three-year battle
over the restructuring of Public Service Co. of New Hampshire has cleared its
last major hurdle with regulatory approval of a state law. But a few
potential stumbling blocks remain, officials said.

In Tallahassee, Fla. the way electricity is generated and delivered to homes
and businesses is likely to be vastly different in a decade. A panel on
Wednesday began to decide how different by developing a statewide energy
policy....One of the most controversial issues is likely to be the prospect
of deregulation and out-of-state power companies that want to challenge the
local monopolies of the state's investor owned utilities.

A California power emergency escalated on Wednesday with some industrial and
commercial customers cut off as scorching temperatures boosted demand and
fires threatened three major transmission lines.

Springville, Utah City officials again face angry power customers....
The City Council will meet at Tuesday evening to talk about payment options
and again try to help
residents understand why they are receiving high utility bills.


Please note the following two errors in the documents emailed earlier
today.  In the Motion for Adoption of the Post-Interim Settlement
Agreement, the name of the Department of General Services should not have
been included in the text.  In the signature blocks of the Post-Interim
Settlement Agreement, the name "Dynegy" was inadvertently included.

Corrected versions will be emailed Wednesday, April 5.  I apologize for any
inconvenience.

Marcel Hawiger
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
711 Van Ness Avenue, Suite 350
San Francisco, CA 94102
(415) 929-8876 x. 311
(415) 929-1132 (fax)
marcel@turn.org


Ya nknow, every year it is the same thing with you guys....we are going to
dominate....we are the best.  The problem is you never deliver.
PL


Steve/Rick/Paul -- In case Bev didn't mention the following to you, I thought
you'd like to see the great feedback we got on Sue's participation in the
VICA Energy Summit.  She really stepped up when we found out at the last
minute that Enron didn't have a representative -- and agreed to fly to LA and
speak on 12 hours notice.  A consummate team player -- kudos, Sue!  kd
---------------------- Forwarded by Karen Denne/Corp/Enron on 04/06/2001
07:33 PM ---------------------------

Susan J Mara
04/06/2001 04:53 PM
To: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: VICA

I just heard from one of our lobbyists, Bev Hansen.  She has received "many"
calls from legislators and others who saw me at the VICA conference.  She
said from their comments that I "knocked their socks off".  They also were
impressed that I was "right there with answers to all the hard questions".
And, in taking on David Freeman, I "made him look like he should retire."
Yahoo! She said some of the Legislators told her that they were sitting
around thinking about who to talk to on these matters and, as a result of
seeing me, thought, "Enron."  I think she mentioned to Rick that she got good
feedback from people on my "speech."

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854


Hi, Shane.  Here's a quick update.  As you can see, the Westpac ISDA is a
done deal.  Susan Bailey (paralegal) had been holding the Commonwealth ISDA
because she didn't have an address.  I asked her to email you for the info.
I am working on ABN AMRO.  I' m also trying to keep up with you other trading
activity.  Let me know if you ever have any questions.  Sara
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 04/20/2000
11:36 AM ---------------------------

Susan Flynn
04/20/2000 10:09 AM
To: Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laurel Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea R
Guillen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, David P Dupre/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Chris Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jarrod Cyprow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pamela
Sonnier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheetal Patel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Souad
Mahmassani/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gordon Heaney/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
Meredith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Derek Bailey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bruce
Mills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jean Bell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry Bucalo/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Charlie Hoang/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marie Heard/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marilyn Colbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Yolanda
Cordova-Gilbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane Ellstrom/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lynn E
Shivers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Willie Harrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect,
Jason Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anthony Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie
Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice
Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Connie Sutton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Willie Harrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anthony Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carrie
Southard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amber Ebow/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nidia
Mendoza/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rod
Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tracy Ngo/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tracy Ngo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly
Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin P Radous/HOU/ECT@ECT, Veronica
Espinoza/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Westpac Banking Corporation

 We have received the following executed Master Agreement:

Type of Contract: ISDA Master Agreement ( Multicurrency-Cross Border)

Effective Date:  April 12, 2000

Enron Entity:  Enron North America Corp.

Counterparty:     Westpac Banking Corporation

Transactions Covered:   Approved for all products except:          pulp and
paper and weather

PLEASE NOTE:   The Counterparty is the Calculation Agent.   The Counterpary
has three (3) Local Business Days after the receipt of a Confirmation from
ENA to accept or dispute the Confirmation.


The ENA Estate Group meeting will be held today at 1:00 pm in ECS 05990.

I look forward to seeing you at the meeting.


Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 06/07/2001 06:11 PM -----

	Susan Bailey
	06/06/2001 01:26 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: MEGA Assignment

Ladies,

I do not which of you will be handling the Merchant Energy Group of the
Americas ("MEGA") consents for financial trading.

So I am forwarding Carol's message to each of you.  As mentioned in my email
of 6/5, Carol is handling the EPMI consents with MEGA.

Thanks.

Cordially,
Susan S. Bailey
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, Suite 3806A
Houston, Texas 77002
Phone: (713) 853-4737
Fax: (713) 646-3490
E:mail:  Susan.Bailey@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT on 06/06/2001 01:23 PM -----

	Carol St Clair
	06/06/2001 11:40 AM

		 To: Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Christian Yoder/Enron@EnronXGate, Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tracy
Ngo/Enron@EnronXGate, Wendy Conwell/Enron@EnronXGate
		 Subject: MEGA Assignment

Rhonda:
Enclosed is a new revised draft of the MEGA Consent marked against the draft
that they sent to us.  Here is what we have decided to do:

1. As a condition to our execution of this Consent, we will execute an
amendment to the existing Master with Morgan to (a) insert collateral
provisions and (b) clean up some of the defined terms in the MEGA confirms.
I will draft the amendment and Christian will help you and Melissa develop
the language for the amendment that deals with the confirm clean-up.

2. We need to know from MEGA and Morgan what the transfer effective date is
that establishes the cutoff date for these trades as between ourselves and
each of Morgan and MEGA.  My revised draft of the Consent makes it clearer
how this cutoff date works.

3. We need a contact from Morgan that we can send the form of amendment to.

Call me if you have any questions.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


Mr. Burrow w/ B&G  has called regarding sales to ENA from his wells.  I have
provided him with a sample  of our Master Firm Purchase/Sale Agreement.
However he has indicated he would only be selling to us.   Do you want me to
proceed with this?  Please advise.

Thanks !

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by James Derrick/Corp/Enron on 12/01/2000
05:18 PM ---------------------------

Linda S Trevino
12/01/2000 04:08 PM
To: ann.ballard@enron.com@ENRON, dave_aamodt, James Derrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Larry.L.Izzo, Mark Metts/NA/Enron@Enron, mary_trosper, Mitchell
Taylor/Corp/Enron@ENRON, peggy_fowler, stephen_quennoz, John
Urquhart/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: reicken@enron.com@ENRON

Subject: Trojan Nuclear Plant, Contract with BNFL

If you have already answered this request, please disregard.

In case you do not have a calendar, the following was emailed:

Jack Urquhart has requested a Conference Call be placed during the week of
December 11th to discuss the current contract with British Nuclear Fuels and
the Trojan decommissioning.  This conference should last for approximately
one hour.

Please advise the date and time you are available during that week via email
to linda.s.trevino@enron.com, or if you prefer, I can be reached at (713)
853-7223.

Thank you,

Linda Trevino


Here is a copy just for completeness.

HK
---------------------- Forwarded by Hollis Kimbrough/EWC/Enron on 06/19/2002
11:43 AM ---------------------------

Hollis Kimbrough
06/19/2002 11:15 AM
To: Jim Mikel/EWC/Enron@Enron
cc: Mark Perryman/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Harvey Kaura/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Dan
Lindquist/EWC/Enron@Enron, Hollis Kimbrough/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Jeff
Maurer/EWC/Enron@ENRON

Subject: LB1 SPC Analytic

Attached please find a new Statistical Process Control analytic which
displays the turbine performance for your site.  The report pdf is a summary
of the other two reports and delineates which turbines fall outside the 2
sigma line for each category.  The other two reports provide more detail
regarding the turbine performance including the degree to which a turbine
falls outside the 2 sigma line.

Please note that we are still working with the analytic and you will find
some extraneous characters in the results.  Please add these characters in
with the main group for which they are intended.  We will have them removed
from the code next month.

Best Regards,
Hollis


Thanks Mark--we'll take a look at this information and be ready to discuss
with you guys.  I'll take the lead on getting a new meeting set up.  DF

Mark Knippa@ECT
02/05/2001 05:28 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, James
Centilli/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron

Subject: Gallup Station - Demand Rebate

Hey Drew,

Sorry that we did not get to meet last week when you were in town.  I have
pulled up some information on the project performance and wanted to share
with the group.  I was very concerned by the comment that the project was on
a rate to cost TW an additional $1.0 million for the year because the demand
avoidance program was not in place.  I do want to confirm that Arnold
Eisenstein at ET&S working on the development of the programming to support
TW's efforts to minimize demand expenses.  It was my understanding during the
development of this project, that TW was targeting a 75% avoidance for an
annual basis.   I offer the following details regarding the actual operation
of the station in 2000.

Peak load for 12,000 hp = 9,621 kw x 3 = 28,864.0 kw per Quarter

Actual Utilization
   3rd Quarter 2000      % of Max  4th Quarter 2000  % of Max
 kw - generation   22,684.8      78.6   17,779       61.6
 kw - transmission 25,421.0      88.1   22,992       79.6

 Target $'s @ 75% 99,142      75.0            73,480      75.0
 Net Actual Rebate  $'s 75,935        78.6                105,181        61.59
  difference            ($23,206)                  $31,702

Overall net for 2000 under Rate 21 appears to reflect that TW has saved
$8,496 above their target rebate of $170,622 (75% avoidance) for the 3rd and
4th quarters.  In addition, ECS has made payment to TW under Rate 19 that
resulted in an additional $118,441 paid to TW.   Note that ECS has proposed
to included the transmission demand in the Rebate process which is not
specifically addressed the Compression Service Agreement.

Currently TW has access to the web site that graphically displays the current
Tri-State generation load as well as several years of month by month
history.  This access was conveyed to TW as soon as the confidentiality
agreement between TW, ECS and Tri-State was executed and delivered to ECS.
At this point, EE&CC (now under ET&S) was notified that the system access was
available to package the load monitoring programming.  As I mentioned above,
that effort is underway.

I will be glad to meet and/or discuss these issues when you are available.  I
will be travelling most of the next (2) weeks but you can reach me via email
or my
cell phone (713) 851-7703.   Based on the information that I was able to pull
together, I just don't see the magnitude of dollars that seems to have TW
concerned.
I would like to discuss at your earliest convenience.

Thanks,
mk


Note:  Attached is the Filed version of the IEP Comments on CAISO Amendment
No. 31.  Thanks for your time and comments.

----- Original Message -----
From: Andy Brown <ABB@eslawfirm.com>
To: Steven Kelly (E-mail) <steven@iepa.com>; Katie Kaplan (E-mail)
<kaplan@iepa.com>; <smutny@iepa.com>
Cc: Douglas Kerner <DKK@eslawfirm.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2000 11:54 AM
Subject: Filed version of FERC filing

> Attached in PDF format is the final document filed at FERC today regarding
> the CAISO price cap filing.  ABB
>
> Andrew B. Brown
> Ellison, Schneider & Harris, LLP
> 2015 H Street
> Sacramento, CA  95814
> Phone: (916) 447-2166
> Fax: (916) 447-3512
> mailto:abb@eslawfirm.com
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  This communication and any accompanying
document(s)
> are confidential and privileged.  They are intended for the sole use of
the
> addressee.  If you receive this transmission in error, you are advised
that
> any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in
> reliance upon the communication is strictly prohibited.  Moreover, any
such
> inadvertent disclosure shall not compromise or waive the attorney-client
> privilege as to this communication or otherwise.  If you have received
this
> communication in error, please contact the sender at the internet address
> indicated or by telephone at (916)447-2166. Thank you.
>
>

 - 001005_IEP_Mo_Interv_ER00-3673_ISOT_Am_31.fin.PDF


Dear Everyone,
?
I, Bob Hillman, will be playing three dates in California  in June.? Consider
yourselves warned!? I will be accompanied by Billy  Masters, an electric
guitar player from New York.
?
Please take special note of the third concert, a house  concert in Marin
County.? For those of you who have never attended a house  concert, or even
heard of the concept, it actually takes place in someone's  home.? In this
case, it's the home of my friend and fellow songwriter  Christopher Smith,
best known for his classic song, "Dead Horse  Trampoline."? I encourage you
Northern California types to consider  attending this event, as it promises
to be a good time and a new  experience.? Contact Christopher at
deadhorse5@home.com for reservations and  directions.?

Also, feel free to check out the recently expanded www.bobhillman.net for
tour dates and  other information.? See you in June!

Wednesday, 27 June
Los Angeles,  CA
Genghis Cohen
740 N. Fairfax Ave.
8:30pmsharp
?
Thursday, 28 June
San Francisco,  CA
Voodoo Lounge
2937 Mission St. (@ Cesar Chavez)
8pm sharp
?
Friday, 29 June
San Anselmo,  CA
Marin House Concerts
7:30pm
Contact: deadhorse5@home.com
?


More:

We need internal agreement on the cancellation fee schedule, to be included
as an exhibit.

What is the status of the Yazoo City master gas agreement?  Do we still want
a master gas agreement for Clarksdale, also?  Do we want it now?

Thanks,

Kay

Kay Mann
05/23/2001 05:05 PM
To: Reagan Rorschach/Enron@EnronXGate, Heather Kroll/Enron@EnronXGate, David
Fairley/Enron@EnronXGate, Tom May/Enron@EnronXGate
cc:

Subject: Open items for MDEA

Here are issues which I'm unclear about, all of which impact the drafting of
the agreement:

How are we setting the heat rate?  Do we have the GADS (?)?  Is it a daily
average, weekly average?  Flat rate? Adjusted? If so, how often?

Are we comfortable that there are no permit restrictions?

We have determined that we won't deal with fuel oil, right?

We aren't making money on gas, right?

Do we have a defn of costs that we like yet, and if so, how does it fit in to
the picture?

Is there an up-to-date set of exhibits?

It would help if theh commercial part of the team could send me the
following, in words and/or formulae:

The defn and method of establishing the bogey (target production cost)
formula can be an exhibit, which would be great for the commercial team to
work on.   Are we determined how we should deal with imbalances (part of cost
of power)?  How are we setting the bogey?  Formula?  Subject to audit? Two
bogeys or one (gas and oil)?

What is defn of profit?  I think I have the general idea, but a sentence or
two would be helpful as a reality check.  What costs are included on the buy
and sell side?

Re stack model: a sentence or two describing what it is and how it is used.

Updated exhibit on facilities, contracted resources, operating limits.

What information does MDEA need for us to provide in order to split
costs/profits?  Are we clear that Cities buy gas, MDEA buys/sells power?

It would be great if I could get one set of answers to these
questions/issues, which has commercial buy in all around.

Thanks,

Kay


Just thought I would drop everyone a note to let them know that my
wife(Heather),,,,, is Pregnant!!!!!!!...... We've known for a while, but
decided to wait till after the first tri-mester to tell..... We are both VERY
excited!    She is due mid October....Also,  we just purchased a house.....
our new address is:

Mike & Heather Carson
4114 Riley
Houston, TX 77005

giddy up!

MC


Hi guys.  We need to add the CES demand charges to the East Desk P&L.  The
impact to the desk is ($694,399).  This includes the demand charge paid to
CALP and the reimbursements for the Penn Fuel capacity.  It does not include
any demand charges paid to Dayton Power & Light.  How are we accounting for
that?

The file is under o:/logistics/capacity/east/ne/ces/2000ces01.xls  Use tab
CES WHOLESALE.  All the demand charges under CES RETAIL are reimbursed.

I sure we are missing some things.  Scott Goodell will be going through this
worksheet tomorrow.


Mark Taylor has asked me to respond to your email.
The NYMEX considers the trades of ENA and its two other principal trading
affiliates (Enron Canada and Enron London), as well as any other affiliates,
to be one and the same as ENA.   The Annual Hedge Exemption applications
require that ENA represent whether its officers, employees, owners, or agents
have a power of attorney, control or have a financial interest in any other
related commodity future(s) account either individually or acting with
another person pursuant to express or implied agreement.as indicated in the
original email from Mark.   In order to make this representation we need to
do due duligence to establish whether our employees have any such accounts,
and if they have such an account, whether having so might raise any concerns
with the NYMEX.
This annual email has a secondary helpful control purpose.  It fleshes out
the trading of employees that might be in violation of the Company's Trading
Policy.   The Trading Policy prohibits Enron employees from trading any
products that the company trades.

	Mark Taylor
	06/26/2000 09:02 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Enron North America Corp. NYMEX Hedge Exemption Applications

----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 06/26/2000 10:01 AM -----

	Elliot Fullwood@ECT
	06/26/2000 07:38 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Enron North America Corp. NYMEX Hedge Exemption Applications

Mark,

I do not understand this.  Please explain.
-------------------------

Elliot Fullwood,

Enron Europe Finance and Trading Ltd.           Tel: +44 (0)20 7783 0000
40 Grosvenor Place                                                 Direct:
+44 (0)20 7783 6906
LONDON
Fax: +44 (0)20 7783 9018
SW1X 7EN

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Mark Taylor @ ENRON                           22/06/2000 01:39

Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: Everyone_in_ECT_Calgary, Everyone_in_ECT_London, Everyone_in_ECT_Denver,
Everyone_in_ECT_Singapore
cc:

Subject: Enron North America Corp. NYMEX Hedge Exemption Applications

We are in the process of preparing applications for position limit exemptions
for ENA,s NYMEX energy commodities futures trading.  These applications
require that ENA represent whether its officers, employees, owners, or agents
have a power of attorney, control or have a financial interest in any other
related commodity future(s) account either individually or acting with
another person pursuant to express or implied agreement.

Please direct any responses to my paralegal, Tana Jones, via intercompany
email or call her at (713) 853-3399 by the end of business Friday, June 30,
2000 if you have any power of attorney, control or have a financial interest
in any commodity futures account (other than an ENA or other trading
affiliate account).

IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A COMMODITY FUTURES ACCOUNT, YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESPOND TO
THIS REQUEST.


I think Lima would make a great bobble head.  You better get there early.

I received an email from Alfons telling me he was resigning from Technip.
I'm clueless why he sent it to me.  Talked to Gerry last week.  He says he is
going to put his Kingwood house on the market.  Hmm.  I hear lots of the old
gang is working with him now.

Have you gone to your reunion yet?  How was it?

Gotta go home but I didn't want to not write back today.  Hope you find all
your Easter eggs.

Kay

ANDREA DOWLEN <nene77057@yahoo.com> on 04/11/2001 02:00:48 PM
To: Kay Mann <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Bobble Head

Kay -
How have I gone all this time without this give -away?
Sunday May 20, 2001 - Larry Dierker Bobble Head
(Williams)
I have to have one for the back of my car!

A friend of my Dad's gave him dice to hang on the rear
view mirror of his new 2001 Cadillac.  And he hung
them.  Kevin says some cable guys cracked up next to
them at a ligth on San Felipe yesterday.
How have you been?  How is your Dad?
Andrea

=====
Andrea Dowlen

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/


Our League Site has been set up.  It is the same site as last year.  Please
take some time to Change your team name and logo.  In addition, for those new
players, the rules are listed on the site.

Let me know if you have questions.

The league abbreviation is kourn.

http://football0.commissioner.com/mp/splash/join-mgmt

Eric


to discuss when we get a moment
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Jordan/LON/ECT on 22/10/2000 15:41
---------------------------

Fernley Dyson
20/10/2000 11:37
To: Mike Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re:

Excellent - we should give it as much profile as possible and ensure that our
'agency' offices read it - it would be good to get it out in advance of
issuing the revised authorised traders list.  Will you be refer to this at
your offsite next week?

Thanks

Mike Jordan
19/10/2000 19:30
To: John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Fernley Dyson/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject:

John

After much debate - Jackie and I agreed on the following wording to cover the
full text - are you comfortable with wording ? If so, would you like it as a
separate Globalflash or part of the next weekly Globalflash ?

Mike

Enron must complement its origination and trading capabilities with the
ability to control and report on all transactions within its portfolios
efficiently and effectively.  Summarised below are the highlights of our
fundamental risk management standards which we must comply with to meet these
objectives.

These standards are a key part of the core discipline for all trading staff -
both Commercial and Commercial Support - and you should review them
carefully.  If you would like to raise any specific questions, please follow
up directly with Mike Jordan on extension 34703.

John Sherriff

RISK MANAGEMENT CONTROLS IN A TRADING ENVIRONMENT

To manage operational risk in a trading environment Enron has designed and
implemented operational control standards. These standards, which are common
for all businesses, aim to prevent errors and inaccuracies and ensure the
timely recording of trading transactions.

What standards does Enron have in place?

Enron has six fundamental standards for risk management that cover:
- Recording transactions
- Reporting daily profit & loss and risk positions
- Confirmation and execution of transactions
- Settlements with counterparties
- Risk management and settlement system information reflected in the general
ledger
- Implementation of business and control infrastructure

What else is important when controls are implemented?

Implementing segregation of duties within the trading environment ensures
that no individual has control over all phases of a transaction.   This
allows incompatible functional responsibilities to be kept separate,
specifically:
- Authorization and execution of transactions
- Recording and performance of transactions
- Monitoring and review of trading activities

Why do we need to standardised controls?

To assimilate new or build existing commodity businesses Enron needs to be
nimble and responsive. A robust and stable control process can be duplicated
or flexed quickly and confidently, providing scalability and the capability
to assess and manage operational risk.

How do we measure successful control?

By identifying and reporting metrics for all standards we build an
understanding of compliance across all businesses and seek continual
improvement. This compliments the qualitative cross-checking process
facilitated by communication between Commercial, Risk Management Operations
and RAC.

The control measurement process will be part of a global initiative across
all commodities and locations.

Where can you find details of our fundamental standards?

Mike Jordan ) Head of Risk Management Operations for Enron Europe
Fernley Dyson ) Chief Accounting Officer for Enron Europe

 - Original one pager


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Estalee

Date:		1/4/2001
Time:		3:00 PM - 4:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Hi David:
Could you give me a call to discuss the project when you get a minute.  I'm
starting to move it along.  Thanks.

Best,
Jeff


The problems with the Online RSVP Form should now be solved.  We are sorry
for any inconvenience that you may have experienced.  Please give it another
try at http://lawconference.corp.enron.com!  Once you have submitted your
RSVP Form, you should receive a confirmation e-mail.  Please review your
confirmation information and let me know if there are any changes.  If you
get an error message and do not receive a confirmation e-mail, please e-mail
me or call me at (713) 853-9129.

Hint:
? Use Internet Explorer as your browser.
? The SAP Company Code should have 4 digits (i.e. 0011).
? The SAP Cost Center should have 6 digits (i.e.100180).

Remember, responses must be submitted no later than Friday, March 30, 2001.
For anyone requesting CLE credit for a state other than Texas, please submit
your RSVP Form by March 23, 2001.  See you in San Antonio!


Laura Wente's PRC rep (Sally Beck) needs to get together with Chris Calger to
gather her performance feedback and overall evuation from Chris.  Sally Beck
will represent Laura in the final associate PRC on July 19th.  Sally will
follow-up with Chris to gather the pertinent information needed to represent
Laura.

Amy FitzPatrick
06/23/2000 11:33 AM
To: Celeste Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Laura Wente

Celeste -

We calibrated our A&As for Portland yesterday.  Chris Calger has recommended
that Laura Wente be promoted at 18 months.

Please let me know if you need anything else.

Thanks!
Amy


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Polsky, Phil
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 7:57 AM
To:	Grigsby, Mike
Subject:	Summary for Grigsby.xls

MIke,

Attached is the updated summary regarding expansions in the west.  There is only one change - PGT 2003 expansion.  The expansion has now dropped from 230,000 MM/d to 160,000 MM/d due to PPL dropping out.

Let me know if you need anything else.

Phil


Germany sounds like an opportunity that you can't pass up, especially now.  Let us know if and when you will be leaving...

We are driving to Seattle on Friday, returning the following Wed.  Long drive, but should be fun.  Keep in touch.
Carl

"Dean, Craig" wrote:

> Hey Carl,
>
> I hope you got my info out to Oliver.  I'd like to hear from him.  I'm
> still "working" for Enron.  Actually we are just sitting around
> according to our shift schedule and answering any calls that might come
> in cuz' there ain't no more tradin' goin' on...
>
> I got an offer to play baseball in Germany this spring/summer.  I think
> I'm going to do it.  Ich spreche wenig Deutsch, aber mehr Ubungen huete.
> (I speak little German, but I practice today)
>
> I plan on sticking around here until 1) they no longer pay me 2) they
> ask me to leave or 3) all of the above
>
> Hope all is well,
> Deano


Lech, DO NOT FILE ON DYNEGY.  DISREGARD PRIOR EMAIL.  The Dynegy master netting does not include the security interest grant.  They deleted it.  I had forgot.  It was a take it or leave it and we had to sign it this way.  Therefore, for now go ahead with the searches, but do not make a filing at this time.  We hope to renegotiate and clean it up this week.

Harlan, please stop by.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Lech Kalembka" <Lech.Kalembka@cwt.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Saturday, November 10, 2001 5:02 PM
To:	Korkmas, Deb
Cc:	Heard, Marie; Cook, Mary; David Mitchell
Subject:	Re: UCC Lien Searches

Same questions as previous email.

Lech Kalembka
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft
100 Maiden Lane
New York, NY  10038
Tel.: (212) 504-6918
Fax: (212) 504-6666
E-mail: lech.kalembka@cwt.com

                    "Korkmas,
                    Deb"                 To:
                    <Deb.Korkmas@        <Lech.kalembka@cwt.com>
                    ENRON.com>           cc:     "Heard, Marie"
                    Office:              <Marie.Heard@ENRON.com>
                                         Subject:     UCC Lien Searches
                    10/31/2001
                    06:16 PM

Marie Heard has requested that I forward the following company names and
jurisdictions for compiling UCC lien searches:

Dynegy, Inc. - Incorporated in Illinois; principal office in Houston,
TX.
Dynegy Marketing and Trade - a Colorado general partnership; principal
office in Houston, TX.
Dynegy Power Marketing, Inc. - Incorporated in Texas; principal office
in Houston, TX.

All of the following are incorporated in Delaware and have principal
offices in Houston, TX:

     Coastal Coal Company, LLC
     Coastal Gas Marketing Company
     Coastal Refining & Marketing, Inc.
     Coastal States Trading Inc.
     Dynegy Midstream Services, Limited Partnership
     El Paso Corporation
     El Paso Merchant Energy, L.P.

Thank you for your assistance.

Deb Korkmas, Senior Legal Specialist
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, ECN 3834A
Houston, TX  77002
Phone:  713-853-5448
Fax:  713-646-3393

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************

==============================================================================
NOTE:  The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you must not read, use or disseminate the information.  Although this email and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect
that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by Cadwalader, Wickersham
& Taft for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use.

==============================================================================


Vince,

I have put together a mini spreadsheet for you.  Please let me know if you need some additional info, as I know that these EA's are pretty critical to the continued success of your group.


---------------------- Forwarded by Larry F Campbell/NA/Enron on 09/05/2000
09:56 AM ---------------------------

Tana Fry <TFry@allenergy.com> on 09/05/2000 09:47:36 AM
To: "'amorris@fpl.com'" <amorris@fpl.com>, "'antonl@aurora-gas.com'"
<antonl@aurora-gas.com>, "'arcadiaBHG@aol.com'" <arcadiaBHG@aol.com>,
"'awinans@njresources.com'" <awinans@njresources.com>,
"'cbangle@reliantenergy.com'" <cbangle@reliantenergy.com>,
"'cdonohue@worldnet.att.net'" <cdonohue@worldnet.att.net>,
"'chalferty@hesco.org'" <chalferty@hesco.org>, "'chris_prejean@perrygas.com'"
<chris_prejean@perrygas.com>, "'crice@nge.com'" <crice@nge.com>,
"'crice@xenergy.com'" <crice@xenergy.com>, "'cruikshankk@conedsolutions.com'"
<cruikshankk@conedsolutions.com>, "'cwhite@duke-energy.com'"
<cwhite@duke-energy.com>, "'cxcoulter@duke-energy.com'"
<cxcoulter@duke-energy.com>, "'DanDiehl@nui.com'" <DanDiehl@nui.com>,
"'danchakr@nmenergy.com'" <danchakr@nmenergy.com>, "'ddees@pcenergy.com'"
<ddees@pcenergy.com>, "'dfields929@aol.com'" <dfields929@aol.com>,
"'dkahl@scana.com'" <dkahl@scana.com>, "'dsweigart@sithe.com'"
<dsweigart@sithe.com>, "'dtierney@njng.com'" <dtierney@njng.com>,
"'end.nat@cwix.com'" <end.nat@cwix.com>, "'eschuhart@noram.com'"
<eschuhart@noram.com>, "'etaphouse@scana.com'" <etaphouse@scana.com>,
"'frambo@reliantenergy.com'" <frambo@reliantenergy.com>,
"'glenda.delarosa@engageenergy.com'" <glenda.delarosa@engageenergy.com>,
"'henry_barth@fpl.com'" <henry_barth@fpl.com>, "'hvandore@statoilenergy.com'"
<hvandore@statoilenergy.com>, "'jay.winter@eprime.com'"
<jay.winter@eprime.com>, "'jillian_orr@enron.com'" <jillian_orr@enron.com>,
"'jlehrmann@metromediaenergy.com'" <jlehrmann@metromediaenergy.com>, Julie
Lieberman <JLieberman@allenergy.com>, "'john.ahrens@pseg.com'"
<john.ahrens@pseg.com>, "'John.Petriccione@conectiv.com'"
<John.Petriccione@conectiv.com>, "'jrising@pepcoenergy.com'"
<jrising@pepcoenergy.com>, "'jwalker@statoilenergy.com'"
<jwalker@statoilenergy.com>, "'jweissman@gasmark.com'"
<jweissman@gasmark.com>, "'jwoodruff@gasmark.com'" <jwoodruff@gasmark.com>,
"'karie.davis@eprime.com'" <karie.davis@eprime.com>,
"'keith-sappenfield@reliantenergy.com'"
<keith-sappenfield@reliantenergy.com>, "'kferreira@njng.com'"
<kferreira@njng.com>, "'kremijio@utilicorp.com'" <kremijio@utilicorp.com>,
"'kyanowski@coral-energy.com'" <kyanowski@coral-energy.com>,
"'lcampbel@enron.com'" <lcampbel@enron.com>, "'linda.kresge@conectiv.com'"
<linda.kresge@conectiv.com>, "'lpohnman@nfrinc.com'" <lpohnman@nfrinc.com>,
"'lrmcclendon@duke-energy.com'" <lrmcclendon@duke-energy.com>,
"'lsmorris@metromediaenergy.com'" <lsmorris@metromediaenergy.com>,
"'lverona@hess.com'" <lverona@hess.com>, "'matthew_b_fleming@ees.enron.com'"
<matthew_b_fleming@ees.enron.com>, "'Max.Doner@enron.com'"
<Max.Doner@enron.com>, "'mblaser@infiniteenergy.com'"
<mblaser@infiniteenergy.com>, "'mcash@coral-energy.com'"
<mcash@coral-energy.com>, "'melanie.plemons@pgees.com'"
<melanie.plemons@pgees.com>, "'MLHA@dynegy.com'" <MLHA@dynegy.com>,
"'NAU87@aol.com'" <NAU87@aol.com>, "'pbaratz@totalnrg.com'"
<pbaratz@totalnrg.com>, "'premierenergy@uswest.net'"
<premierenergy@uswest.net>, "'rhonda_parker@perrygas.com'"
<rhonda_parker@perrygas.com>, "'sbenke@enron.com'" <sbenke@enron.com>,
"'sburrus@spragueenergy.com'" <sburrus@spragueenergy.com>,
"'sgamlin@spragueenergy.com'" <sgamlin@spragueenergy.com>,
"'sperry@statoilenergy.com'" <sperry@statoilenergy.com>, "'tfoxen@sithe.com'"
<tfoxen@sithe.com>, "'tgoudie@hesco.org'" <tgoudie@hesco.org>,
"'tpwithka@sprague.com'" <tpwithka@sprague.com>, "'William_Quigley@FPL.com'"
<William_Quigley@FPL.com>
cc:

Subject: Etown Length 8/00

I have length in August.  Please call if you need gas behind Elizabethtown.

Thank you,
Tana Fry
781-906-2288


Please set up the following CGAS contracts.  Please note; ENA is agent for CES

Pipeline CGAS
Contract 64031
Firmness IT
Service Type Storage Service
Rate  ISS
Term Type Term
Eff Date  1/1/2000 - 1/31/2000  Evergreen

Pipeline CGAS
Contract 64041
Firmness IT
Service Type Storage Service
Rate  ISS
Term Type Term
Eff Date  1/1/2000 - 1/31/2000  Evergreen


----- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 09/25/2000 01:37 PM -----

	Dale Rasmussen
	09/25/2000 01:19 PM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Karen E Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Al Larsen
		 Subject: Re: Who Moved My Cheese?

Would it be possible to send a copy or two to Portland so we can do our due
diligence?

Thanks.

From: Mark E Haedicke on 09/25/2000 11:30 AM CDT
Sent by: Janette Elbertson
To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roger Balog/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy
Banczak/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandi M Braband/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron, Teresa G Bushman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Carter/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barton Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M
Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shonnie Daniel/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Angela Davis/NA/Enron@Enron, Peter del Vecchio/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy E
Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shawna Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Gaffney/TOR/ECT@ECT,
Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, James Grace/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark
Greenberg/NA/Enron@ENRON, Wayne Gresham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie
Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen E Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anne C
Koehler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Travis
McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet H
Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janice R Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julia Murray/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marcus Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON, Martin W
Penkwitz/NA/Enron@Enron, David Portz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Michael A Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B
Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lance Schuler-Legal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lou Stoler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ann Elizabeth
White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kimberlee A Bennick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Genia
FitzGerald/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nony Flores/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda R Guinn/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Ed B Hearn III/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary J Heinitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Deb Korkmas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laurie Mayer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matt
Maxwell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Ogden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debra
Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Young/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Merrill W Haas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea Calo/SA/Enron@Enron, David
Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Greg Johnston/CAL/ECT@ECT, Peter
Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT, Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark
Elliott/LON/ECT@ECT, Robert Quick/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT,
Martin Rosell/OSL/ECT@ECT, Greg Johnston/CAL/ECT@ECT, Mark
Powell/CAL/ECT@ECT, Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT,
Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri L Cromwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joya
Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janette Elbertson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kaye Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Carolyn George/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jenny Helton/HOU/ECT@ect, Taffy
Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda J Noske/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Radford/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Becky Tlucek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda J Simmons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dina
Snow/Corp/Enron@Enron, Twanda Sweet/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda
Whitehead/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chaundra Woods/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gloria
Cruz/Corp/Enron@Enron, Reginald Shanks/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Who Moved My Cheese?

We have purchased 30 copies of the referenced book.  It is a short read --
about 30-45 minutes.  The copies are located at the clerks' station, EB3808.
Please read this short story prior to our ENA Legal Conference and then
return it to the clerks' station so everyone attending the conference will
have an opportunity to read it prior to the conference.


I'm working on it.


You have received this email because you are listed as a data approver. Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000080522&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000080522
Request Create Date : 1/8/02 7:58:56 AM
Requested For       : phillip.m.love@enron.com
Resource Name       : Sitara Houston Production Denver Edit Risk Analytics
Resource Type       : Applications


-----Original Message-----
From: Lokay, Michelle
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 10:25 AM
To: Schoolcraft, Darrell
Subject: Revised 03/20 Gas Sales Confirmation


In this issue:

?- Blackouts...Has the Summer Arrived?

?- Additional plants continue to be announced throughout the U.S.

?- All the news, commentary, and earnings reports, plus price performance and
valuation charts.

?

?Best regards,

?Cary, Steve and Peter

 <<prometheus010511.pdf>>

Noriko Miyagi

Reed Wasden &Associates

11120 NE 2nd Street

Bellevue, WA 98004

(T) 425-467-1110

 - prometheus010511.pdf


fyi

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	CustomerNotices, WGPHOU [mailto:WGPHOU.CustomerNotices@Williams.com]
Sent:	Friday, October 12, 2001 3:01 PM
Subject:	GSS/LSS Rate changes Effective 11/01

October 12, 2001

To:  LSS and GSS Customers

Re:  DTI Changes Effective 11/1/01

On September 21, 2001, Dominion Transmission, Inc. (DTI)
filed revised tariff sheets in Docket No. RP01-632 in order
to implement its Settlement which was approved by the
Commission in a letter order issued September 13, 2001.  DTI
anticipates an effective date of November 1, 2001.  Included
in DTI's filing are revised rates under its Rate Schedule
GSS which Transco uses to render service to its customers
under its Rate Schedules LSS and GSS. If accepted as
proposed, the revised DTI rates would result in the
following changes to Transco's current Rate Schedules LSS
and GSS rates:

GSS Deliverability Charge -       $0.0006 increase
GSS Injection Charge -            $0.0171 decrease
GSS Withdrawal Charge -           $0.0171 decrease
GSS Excess Delivery Charge -      $0.0170 decrease
LSS Demand Charge -               $0.0007 increase
LSS Injection Charge -            $0.0193 decrease
LSS Withdrawal Charge -           $0.0194 decrease

In addition, on September 21, 2001, DTI filed revised tariff
sheets in Docket No. RP01-611 in order to comply with the
Stipulation and Agreement in Docket Nos. RP97-406, et al.
The filing reflects a phased conversion of Rate Schedule
GSS-II entitlements to Rate Schedule GSS with a proposed
effective date of November 1, 2001. Included in DTI's filing
are revised rates under its Rate Schedule GSS which Transco
uses to render service to its customers under its Rate
Schedules LSS and GSS. If accepted as proposed, the revised
DTI rates would result in the following changes to Transco's
current Rate Schedules LSS and GSS rates:

GSS Deliverability Charge -       $0.0100 increase
GSS Capacity Charge -             $0.0002 increase
GSS Injection Charge -            $0.0001 decrease
GSS Excess Delivery Charge -      $0.0043 increase
LSS Demand Charge -               $0.0120 increase
LSS Capacity Charge -             $0.0002 increase
LSS Injection Charge -            $0.0001 decrease

On September 28, 2001, DTI also filed revised tariff sheets
in Docket No. RP01-625 in order to update its Electric Power
Cost Adjustment.  Included in DTI's filing are revised rates
under its Rate Schedule GSS which Transco uses to render
service to its customers under its Rate Schedules LSS and
GSS. If accepted as proposed, the revised DTI rates would
result in the following changes in Transco's current Rate
Schedules LSS and GSS rates effective November 1, 2001:

GSS Deliverability Charge -       $0.0023 increase
GSS Injection Charge -            $0.0004 decrease
GSS Withdrawal Charge -           $0.0001 increase
GSS Excess Delivery Charge -      $0.0005 increase
LSS Demand Charge -               $0.0028 increase
LSS Injection Charge -            $0.0004 decrease
LSS Withdrawal Charge -           $0.0001 increase

On September 28, 2001, DTI also filed revised tariff sheets
in Docket No. RP01-626 in order to update its Transportation
Cost Rate Adjustment.  Included in DTI's filing are revised
rates under its Rate Schedule GSS which Transco uses to
render service to its customers under its Rate Schedules LSS
and GSS. If accepted as proposed, the revised DTI rates
would result in the following changes to Transco's current
Rate Schedules LSS and GSS rates:

GSS Deliverability Charge -       $0.0145 decrease
GSS Injection Charge -            $0.0007 decrease
GSS Withdrawal Charge -           $0.0007 decrease
GSS Excess Delivery Charge -      $0.0034 decrease
LSS Demand Charge -               $0.0174 decrease
LSS Injection Charge -            $0.0008 decrease
LSS Withdrawal Charge -           $0.0008 decrease

Please refer any questions to Mike Heeney, Rate Department,
at (713) 215-2424.


Good job.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Yeung, Charles
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 3:27 PM
To:	'mbennett@epsa.org'
Cc:	Bestard, Jose; Steffes, James D.
Subject:	Enron Support for SRO

Mark

Here is a document Enron has prepared that describes what we want to see in a wholesale electric Standards Setting Organization (SSO).

I hope you will be able to consider these points for the letter you will be drafting from EPSA to the NERC Board of Trustees.

Please do not distribute this until Jose Bestard, as member of the Stakeholder Committee, has had an opportunity to convey this to Mike Gent.

Thanks
Charles

 << File: Enron Principles on Electric SSO3.doc >>


David and Paul:

As you are aware Sheila Tweed has been championing achieving a standardized
turbine purchase agreement with GE for domestic applications.  Attached is
the current draft of such document.  Please review the insurance provisions
to see if there are any changes needed.   I believe the current drafting is
what we have used in the past.

Given the technology issues of late do we need to make any changes.  This
would be for 7FA and LM6000 applications which I believe the market views as
proven technology so I assume we will not need to shift collateral damage to
GE and expose GE to insurer subrogation.

Scott Dieball and I are in London- Enron House.  Today Tuesday our telephone
number is  44-207-783-0517.   Please call at your earliest convenience so we
can discuss conceptually.

I would prefer not to make drafting changes for the sake of style at this
point.


---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 01/12/2001 10:50 AM
---------------------------

Shonnie Daniel
11/02/2000 11:23 AM
To: Mark Smith/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Bridgeline Exclusive Customers

Mark,
Attached is a revised memo.  The memo previously forwarded defined Bridgeline
exclusive customers as those connected to interstate pipelines.  The correct
definition of Bridgeline exclusive customers are those connected exclusively
to intrastate pipelines.  I'm sorry for any confusion.  Please destroy any
copies of the previous memo.  Thanks.  Shonnie

----- Forwarded by Shonnie Daniel/HOU/ECT on 11/02/2000 11:19 AM -----

	Shonnie Daniel
	11/01/2000 03:19 PM

		 To: Mark Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Bridgeline Exclusive Customers

Mark,

Attached is a memo setting forth the customers/facilities that are included
in the Bridgeline non compete agreement.  Please call with any questions.
Shonnie 31463

	Mark Smith@ENRON
	11/01/2000 09:01 AM

		 To: Shonnie Daniel/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Bridgeline List of Industrial Customer off limits to ENA

Shonnie,
 Scott Neal gave me your name as someone who might be able to provide me with
the list of customers that are "off-limits" to ENA to provide physical gas to
via the Bridgeline agreement.  If you could email me that list, it would be
helpful.  Thanks

Mark Smith
Manager
3-6601


Attached are new draft responses to the Frontera Notices of Force Majeure/
Uncpontrollable Forces, for dispatch today if the your desk deems
appropriate.   Please review and comment.  Also please let me know who would
sign these letters for the desk. I will distribute to each of you hard copies
of Frontera's notices.  -David


Cary,

Here is the picture of the house I have in mind.  I was going for a simple
farmhouse style to  place on 5 acres near Wimberley.

A few points that might not be obvious from the plans are:

There will be a double porch across the back just like the front
No dormers (Metal roof)
1/2 bath under stairs
Overall dimensions are 55 by 40

What I am looking for is a little design help in the kitchen.  More cabinets,
maybe a different shaped island, and a way to enlarge the pantry.    Reagan
suggested that I find a way to make the exterior more attractive.  I want to
keep a simple roof line to avoid leaks, but I was thinking about bringing the
left
side forward in the front of the house and place 1 gable in the front.  That
might look good if the exterior was stone and stucco.  Also the front porch
would
be smaller.

I have 3 bids from builders all around $325,000.  I am ready to go ahead and
have the plans done so I can spec out all the finishings and choose a builder.
I just wanted to give you the opportunity to do the work.  As I mentioned my
alternative is $0.60/ft.  I thought that since I had a such a detailed
sketch, you might consider the job for less than the $6,000 that Reagan
allowed.

Phillip Allen
713-853-7041

---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 03/29/2001
09:10 AM ---------------------------

Hunter S Shively
03/26/2001 10:01 AM
To: phillip.k.allen@enron.com
cc:
Subject:


Hey Kevin,
We understand you will be coming home in a few weeks.
Do you know the exact date, or did my husband just not tell me?
I'm testing out my email ability since Lisa was able to give me your address
last night.
We're glad to hear all is going well and the the house will be completed
sooner than expected!

Enjoy the heat!!!! Gloria

________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com


We're coming down to the final wire on the Green-eT-RECs standard.  Below is a synopsis of the outstanding issues.  I wanted to get your thought about the following the options.  I agree with staff that choice #1 is ideal.  My second choice is #3.  The issue is this: Each of the regions has slightly different to dramatically different definitions for eligible resources for a Green-e certified electricity product.  In order to have a national standard whereby a marketer can market the same product across the states, staff has proposed certifying generators per region.  These generators would be certified according to that region's standard.  The T-RECS could then be marketed anywhere.  Some folks want to control not only the generators that are certified, but the products that are sold in their region.  Thus the option for the highest common denominator (choice #2).  I think we need to go with the most administratively simple method that will promote the most liquidity.  Certifying generator or creating a separate T-RECs standard seem to be the easiest.

Let me know your thoughts.  I'd like to get back with Meredith today.  Also, these issues are pretty nebulous -- so call if you have ?s.

Stacey Bolton
Environmental Strategies
Enron Corp
713-853-9916 direct
713-303-2632 cell
stacey.bolton@enron.com <mailto:stacey.bolton@enron.com>

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Meredith Wingate" <mwingate@resource-solutions.org>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, November 06, 2001 4:34 PM
To:	Anne Marie McShea; Barbara Atkinson \(LBNL\); Brenna Herpmann; Brent Beerley; Jeff Schmidt; Kevin Porter; Liz Robinson; Maureen Mulligan; Mark Crowdis; Matt Deluca; Peter Adels; Rich Travaglini; Roger Clark; Sam Swanson; Serpil Guran; Stacey Bolton; Maryanne Daniel
Cc:	Dan Lieberman; Andrew Altman; Kirk Brown
Subject:	Generator based sourcing standards

Folks,
As you know, at our last meeting, I promised to circulate the different  options we discussed on generator -based sourcing standards.

The  problem we are trying to solve is this:  We'd like to develop a national  definition for "eligible" renewables  for certification of   T-RECs products under Green-e.  The problem is that if we did a  highest common denominator standard, some renewables, namely biomass would be  excluded.  We feel that this would be a somewhat arbitrary exclusion  because biomass has been excluded from some regional standards because of  specific regional circumstances and that it would not be fair to penalize the  entire biomass industry by eliminating it from the T-RECs - Green-e  market.

So  staff have proposed a generator based sourcing standard.  Eligibility would thus apply to renewable  generators, not marketers.  So if a generator qualified, they would-be  able to market their T-RECs anywhere in the US.  The general feedback I got  from you was that people didn't like this idea because (1) it wasn't clear for  the consumer what types of eligible are allowed under Green-e cert. (e.g.  Georgia biomass excluded, but PA biomass allowed) and (2) effectively gave  marketers the ability to sell a type of power into a market that might not meet  the regional definition of eligible, (e.g. you could sell forestry-derived  biomass generated in New England into the PA market - the generator would  meet the new England definition for eligible and therefore would be able to sell  that power anywhere.)

We discussed a couple of different  options for handling this dilemma.  Here are a few of the major pros an  cons.
1.       Adopt a single  generator-based sourcing standard for electricity and T-RECs (this was the  proposal by staff)
 pros: it is consistent b/t  electricity and T-RECs products, and it allows for regional definitions of  eligibility;
cons: not clear for the consumer what types  of eligible are allowed under Green-e cert.;  effectively gives  marketers the ability to sell a type of power into a market that might not  meet the regional definition of eligible

2.       Don't change electricity  standards (keep definition of "eligible" renewable as regional product standard)  but have a  T-RECs standard that is based on the highest common denominator  of all regional Green-e/Green pricing standards. A highest common  denominator standard would include solar, wind, digester gas, and possibly LIHI  hydro, geothermal landfill methane with some NOx limits.  I say  "possibly" because these things aren't included in green  pricing eligibility criteria but we think we might be able to convince  stakeholders there to accept them.
Pros: Meets both regional definitions for  what is generated in a state and what is marketed in a state
Cons: inconsistent  standard b/t electricity products and T-RECs products; eliminates  biomass and possibly other renewables from eligibility for  T-RECs

3.       Don't change electricity  standard but develop a new national definition for what T-RECs are "eligible"  (this would not necessarily be a highest common denominator standard, but more  of a "generally accepted renewable" standard)
Pros: Doesn't change electricity standard; makes it clear for consumers  what's in a Green-e certified product
Cons: potentially inconsistent standard b/t electricity products  and T-RECs products; could undermine regional standards if something is  approved as eligible for T-RECs but it is not eligible for  electricity.

4.       keep product standard  for both electricity and for T-RECs; require both electricity providers and  T-RECs providers to meet the regional  definitions.
Pros: Meets both regional definitions for  what is generated in a state and what is marketed in a state
Cons: requires T-RECs marketers to market  different products for different regions- could prevent them from seeking  certification; inconsistent standard b/t electricity products and T-RECs  products
Please send me your  feedback on these different options. We did have an option 5, but upon  reflection, it appeared to me to be the same as one of the other options.   if this isn't enough selection for you, feel free to add you own option too!

Thanks,
Meredith

Meredith Wingate
Center for Resource Solutions
Presidio Building  49
PO Box 29512
San Francisco, CA  94134
415-561-2100
_________________________
Information about CRS  programs is available at www.resource-solutions.org
Curious  about Green-e and green power? Check out www.green-e.org


>  >>This is to voice the rights of ALL the women in
> the world.
>  >>
>  >>GIRL POWER!!!
>  >>Men are scum!  Women are future rulers of the
> world!
>  >>allen
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>>>  A WOMEN'S PLACE IS
>  >>>>  IN THE HOUSE-
>  >>>>  AND IN THE SENATE.
>  >>>>
>  >>>>  MEN ARE LIKE
>  >>>>  TOILETS-EITHER OCCUPIED OR FULL OF SHIT.
>  >>>>
>  >>>>  MENopause
>  >>>>  MENtal anxiety
>  >>>>  MENstrual cramps
>  >>>>  MENtal breakdown...
>  >>>>
>  >>>>  Ever notice how all our problems begin with
> MEN?
>  >>>>
>  >>>>
>  >>>>  SURE, GOD MADE MEN BEFORE WOMEN, BUT EVERYONE
> HAS TO MAKE A ROUGH
>  >>>>  DRAFT
>  >>>>  BEFORE A FINAL COPY!
>  >>>>
>  >>>>  GOD MADE RIVERS,
>  >>>>  GOD MADE LAKES,
>  >>>>  GOD MADE MEN,
>  >>>>  WE ALL MAKE MISTAKES!!!
>  >>>>
>  >>>>
>  >>>>  OF COURSE I DON'T LOOK AS BUSY AS A MAN-I DID
> IT RIGHT THE FIRST
>  >>>>  TIME!
>  >>>>
>  >>>>  MEN HAVE THE POWER TO DESTROY THE EARTH, BUT
>  >>>>  WOMEN HAVE THE WISDOM
>  >>>>  TO SAVE IT!
>  >>>>
>  >>>>  IF WOMEN HAVE 2 X
>  >>>>  CHROMOSOMES AND MEN ONLY HAVE ONE, THEN THAT
> MEANS
>  >>>>  WOMEN ARE 100%
>  >>>>  WOMEN AND MEN ARE 50% WOMEN.
>  >>>>
>  >>>>  I WISH MY MOM WOULD HAVE TOLD
>  >>>>  ME THE SAME THING ABOUT GUYS AS SHE
>  >>>>  SAID TO ME ABOUT HORROR MOVIES
>  >>>>  WHEN I WAS FIVE-DON'T WORRY HONEY-IT'S
>  >>>>  ALL FAKE!
>  >>>>
>  >>>>
>  >>>>  NEVER CRY OVER A GUY!
>  >>>>
>  >>>>  BEHIND EVERY GREAT MAN IS A GREATER WOMAN.
>  >>>>
>  >>>>  YOU HAVE TO KISS A LOT OF FROGS BEFORE YOU
> KISS A PRINCE.
>  >>>>
>  >>>>  WHEN GOD MADE MEN, SHE WAS ONLY KIDDING!
>  >>>>
>  >>>>
>  >>>>  GOD CREATED DINOSAURS,
>  >>>>  GOD DESTROYED DINOSAURS.
>  >>>>  GOD CREATED MAN,
>  >>>>  MAN DESTROYS GOD..
>  >>>>  MAN CREATES
>  >>>>  DINOSAURS,
>  >>>>  DINOSAURS DESTROY MAN...
>  >>>>  WOMEN INHERIT THE EARTH!
>  >>>>
>  >>>>  SEND THIS TO EVERY GIRL YOU KNOW TO SPREAD
> THE
>  >>>>  MESSAGE
>  >>
>  >>Yeah!  Send this message!! Go Girls!!


[IMAGE]

March 27, 2001

Can't read this email? Click here
Issue#: e12303

PROVANTAGE Customer: jeff_dasovich@enron.com

To unsubscribe from the?
Original Advantage Click here
(Do Not Reply to this email)

PROVANTAGE - The Original Advantage
?

Products that give you the Professional Advantage!

[IMAGE]
340 Series 11Mbps DSSS PCI Adapter w/128-Bit WEP
By Cisco Systems

Cisco Aironet 340 Series client adapters couple the mobility, freedom, and
flexibility of wireless local-area networking with the bandwidth required by
...More

??$257.95

[IMAGE]
Red Hat Linux Professional Server v7.0
By Red Hat Software

Red Hat Professional Server contains everything you need to set up Red Hat
Linux 7 for a serious server environment. In addition to the award-winning
Red ...More

??$148.95
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
MiniView 4-Port PS2 KVM Switch w/Cables
By IOGEAR

Introducing the new two and four-port MiniView KVM switches from IOGEAR -
simple solutions for those with more PCs than hands. Use one keyboard, one
mouse ...More

??$127.69
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
Dreamweaver v4.0 for Windows 9x/NT/2000/Me
By Macromedia

Dreamweaver 4 is everything you need to create and manage small business
sites, corporate Intranets, and complex web businesses. Familiar page layout
techniques ...More

??$263.95
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
Broadband IEEE 802.11B Wireless Gateway
By D-Link Systems

The D-Link DI-713 is a broadband IEEE 802.11b compliant wireless gateway. A
single Ethernet port allows a DSL or Cable Modem to be connected and shared
...More

??$319.95
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
Illustrator v9.0 for Windows 9x/NT/2000
By Adobe Systems

With Adobe Illustrator 9.0 software, you can easily transform your ideas into
dazzling graphics for use on the Web, in print, and in dynamic media. Design
...More

??$385.88
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
Back-UPS Office 350
By APC

Purchase an APC Back-UPS Office 500 and receive a $15 mail in rebate! Offer
valid until March 31, 2001. ...More

??$72.56
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
New!

Personal Wireless Planner
By Cybiko

CYBIKO is a wireless hand held computer for teens. It's EVERYTHING!!!
One Cybiko Wireless Computer gives you 10+ super products:
Wireless ...More

??$89.95
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
CPD-E210 Multiscan 17in FD Trinitron 1600x1200
By Sony

The virtually flat, high-resolution FD Trinitron CRT combined with a variable
0.24-0.25mm aperture grille pitch, and precise, convenient on-screen digital
...More

??$319.95
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
E70 17in/16.0v 27m 1280x1024 70HZ MPR-II
By ViewSonic

The E2 Series from ViewSonic are the most affordable monitors available in
the market today. As the price/ performance leader, ViewSonic provides an
intelligent ...More

??$186.95
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
New!

Topo USA 3.0 for Windows 95/98/Me
By DeLORME

Topo USA 3.0 offers automatic trail routing and road routing for the entire
US under $100. View 2-D and 3-D maps with new land cover features, and shaded
...More

??$90.95
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
Jukebox 6000 with 6GB USB HD/MP3 Player
By Archos Technology

With up to 6,000 minutes of playback time, compared with 32 or 64 minutes for
most MP3 players currently on the market, this compact, lightweight MP3
Jukebox ...More

??$307.95
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
Intel Processors

UPGRADE NOW! Great Prices on Intel Processors
Intel processors provide quality computing solutions designed to fit your
needs. Whether you're a business professional, hard-core gamer, Internet
surfer, or a new PC user, just look for the Intel Insider logo, the sign of
quality and reliability.

[IMAGE]
U.S. Robotics 56K Faxmodem V90 PCI
By 3Com

The World Wide Web offers businesses and families a range of resources no one
could imagine only a few years ago. But to see the detailed graphics and ...
More

??$71.95
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
40x/16x/10x Rewritable EIDE CD-RW w/Software & Med
By Plextor

The PlexWriter 16/10/40A delivers what other companies only talk about!_True,
unmatched 16X write capability from core to edge of a CD. Create a 650MB ...
More

??$225.68
[IMAGE]

?
?

Web Address: www.PROVANTAGE.com?
?Toll Free: 800-336-1166???? Fax: 330-494-5260???? email:
sales@provantage.com

Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | FREE Catalog

,2001 PROVANTAGE Corporation, 7249 Whipple Ave. NW, North Canton, OH 44720

Products, prices, terms, conditions, or offers may change at any time.
Company and/or product names are generally trademarks, or registered
trademarks of their respective companies. Some promotional text may be
copyrighted by the product's manufacturer.?

 The Original Advantage promotional email is delivered only to customers of
PROVANTAGE Corporation. PROVANTAGE customers have purchased products in the
past and submitted their email address as part of the checkout process. Or,
customers have entered their name in the "Add to Email List" box on the
PROVANTAGE.com home page. Any customer may unsubscribe from the list at any
time by going to http://www.provantage.com/unsubscribe.htm. The email address
is permanently removed from additional promotional electronic mailings, and
will not be reactivated unless requested by the customer.??

[IMAGE]

BizRate Customer Certified (GOLD) Site


Rita, Please help me with this. I have some questions regarding Enerfin.
Why are we re-allocating prior month volumes at Enerfin after we matched your
original numbers back in October? Can't this be fixed in the actualization
process?
The numbers for October between ENA-TETCO and HPL vary a good bit.  Are we
your only customer at that point and why do we show volumes on days ENA had
no transactions with HPL?  Can we simply put zero paths in UNIFY and extend
our existing deals in Sitara with zero volumes and have you guys actualize
these small volumes to handle this?  We go round and round at this point
changing volumes two, three or more times. Call me if you have questions..
Thanks Victor
---------------------- Forwarded by Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT on 12/14/2000
08:50 AM ---------------------------
From: Meredith Mitchell on 12/14/2000 09:28 AM
To: Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: HPL discrepancy

Victor,

The sitara ticket that we were using for the month of October is #421415.
TETCO shows that the volumes that HPL was allocated on October 6th and
October 19th, were 9 dths and 44 dths, respectively.  Those volumes were
pulled off of our backhaul contract because there was no nomination in
place.  This is the same problem that we have had over and over with them.
Also, we just found out on Tuesday, that the OBA did not go into effect until
December 1, 2000.  We were originally told that they were putting the OBA in
effect retroactively to November of 1999.  In fact, I thought that HPL had
made a lot of retroactive changes in the system to adjust for the OBA, do you
remember that?  HPL told us that Ray Calles at TETCO is the one who decided
that the OBA would not be effective until December of 2000.  Nobody even
informed us of this change, I stumbled upon it when researching a November
issue for Alfonso Trabulsi and Brenda Fletcher.  In addition to all of this,
I received another email, which I will copy below, asking me to go in for the
month of October and adjust all of my estimated volumes in Unify to match
what HPL shows that we were allocated.  I had been going in all month long
and matching to their numbers, and we were clean for the deadline at the end
of the month.  I ran the allocation report from TETCO for the month of
October, and some of HPL's numbers were very different from TETCO's,
including the two days that I mentioned above.  I sent Jackie Young an email
back showing her TETCO's numbers and I haven't received a response.  I will
copy that email below as well, just to catch you up on what's been going on.

Jackie Young
12/12/2000 10:01 AM
To: Cynthia Franklin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Meredith Mitchell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sherlyn Schumack/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Estimated Volumes for meter 98-0439 for (10/2000)

Cynthia/Meredith:

Please find below the estimates for the above referenced meter for 10/2000.
Once you're done placing these estimates on TETCO's side, can you please
apprise me so that volume mgt. can conclude their business?

Thanks
-Jackie-
3-9497

DAY	VOLUMES
1	39647
2	40040
3	39643
4	39809
5	39702
6	18 dec. (str. gas)
7
8
9
10
11	29162
12	14689
13	40400
14	30599
15	30523
16	30394
17	30369
18	40547
19	88 dec. (str. gas)
20	10126
21	20167
22	20208
23	20502
24	40408
25	45721
26	30978
27	43142
28	9667
29	9536
30	10290
31

	From:  Meredith Mitchell                           12/12/2000 11:37 AM

To: Jackie Young/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: October Volumes

Hi Jackie,

I ran a report from TETCO's system to show the volumes that Enron was
allocated for the month of October, and some of the volumes are very
different from the volumes that you show.  I copied your numbers below and
copied TETCO's volumes below that (with the disrepancies in red).  I was
wondering if you could double check the 3rd, 4th, 11th, 12th, 25th, and 27th
to see if you had purchases on those days from a counterparty other than
Enron North America at that meter.  It looks like maybe the volumes that you
show are the total flow at that meter, but I think that only part of the gas
was actually allocated to us.  I don't mind putting the allocated volumes in
path manager, but I'd like to make sure that on the above days, I am only
putting in the amount that Enron was allocated.

Also, on the 6th and the 19th TETCO shows exactly half of what you show,
which I thought was kind of strange.  I am going to have to get TETCO's
permission to do a retroactive nomination for those two days at the volumes
you have requested, before I can put anything in Sitara or Unify.  My manager
is out of the office and will be back tomorrow, but I would like for him to
double check the deal that we will have to create in Sitara for those two
days, since we are dealing with a prior month issue.

DAY	VOLUMES
1	39647
2	40040
3	39643
4	39809
5	39702
6	18 dec. (str. gas)
7
8
9
10
11	29162
12	14689
13	40400
14	30599
15	30523
16	30394
17	30369
18	40547
19	88 dec. (str. gas)
20	10126
21	20167
22	20208
23	20502
24	40408
25	45721
26	30978
27	43142
28	9667
29	9536
30	10290
31

DAY	VOLUMES
1	39647
2	40040
3	29732
4	24881
5	39702
6	9 dec. (str. gas)
7
8
9
10
11	19441
12	9793
13	40400
14	30599
15	30523
16	30394
17	30369
18	40547
19	44 dec. (str. gas)
20	10126
21	20167
22	20208
23	20502
24	40408
25	25401
26	30978
27	30099
28	9667
29	9536
30	10290
31


Tom --

There does appear to be some intelligence gathering going on at the CPUC.  You should speak with legal about the inquiry.  Clearly the CPUC has a right to ask anything they want - it is my understanding is that our customers have a confidentiality clause in their contract that prohibits them from responding.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Riley, Tom" <Tom.Riley@enron.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Riley+2C+20Tom+22+20+3CTom+2ERiley+40enron+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Friday, August 31, 2001 5:55 PM
To:	Steffes, James D.; Mara, Susan; Dasovich, Jeff
Cc:	Evans,Mark; Wu,Andrew; Hurt,Robert; Frazier,Lamar; Huddleson,Diann
Subject:	FW: Enron DASRs filed since July 1, 2001

Jim, et al,

Interesting e-mail from UC.  Apparently the PUC is implying to UC that DASRs
submitted after July 1 need to be associated with a contract executed prior
to July 1.  Is this consistent with our intell?  Can they make these
inquiries?  Please advise.

Tom

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Maric Munn <Maric.munn@ucop.edu>@ENRON@EES
> Sent:	Wednesday, August 29, 2001 9:38 PM
> To:	TRiley@enron.com; dhuddles@enron.com
> Cc:	mgutheinz@calstate.edu; KTilton <ktilton@gralegal.com>
> Subject:	Fwd: Enron DASRs filed since July 1, 2001
>
> Tom, Diann -
>
> Do you have data on number of DASRs that have been submitted for UC/CSU
> accounts post July 1, 2001.  DO you also have a breakdown of number of
> DASRs that were for accounts that were part of the original group of
> accounts that were un-DASRd and re-DASRd vs. the number of DASRs for the
> accounts that were being DASR'd for the first time?  Read below -
> enquiring
> minds at the CPUC want to know.
>
> Thanks
>
> Maric
>
>
> >X-Sent: 30 Aug 2001 00:13:56 GMT
> >Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 17:03:09 -0700
> >From: KTilton <ktilton@gralegal.com>
> >X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (Win98; I)
> >X-Accept-Language: en,pdf
> >To: Maric Munn <Maric.Munn@ucop.edu>, Mark Gutheinz
> <mgutheinz@calstate.edu>
> >CC: Irene Moosen <imoosen@gralegal.com>
> >Subject: Enron DASRs filed since July 1, 2001
> >
> >Maric, Mark:
> >
> >Our office has received telephone calls from CPUC Energy Division staff
> >regarding the Enron DASRs filed since July 1, 2001, and specifically
> >whether recent DASRs filed are under an existing contract - that was
> >executed prior to July 1 (as opposed to new Direct access contracts,
> >post July 1).  The Energy Division staff is being asked by their
> >superiors to determine how many of the post-July 1 DASRs (for all
> >customers, not just UC/CSU) were under an existing contract versus a
> >new, post-July 1 contract.  As you know, this relates to the revised
> >draft decision which suspends direct access effective July 1.
> >
> >We have explained that the new Enron DASRs for the campuses are under an
> >existing contract - the original contract that was executed in 1998. But
> >one energy staff member has requested a specific number of post-July 1
> >Enron DASRs filed for the campuses - as they were returned to direct
> >access service under the contract.  Therefore, I am making this request
> >from you.
> >
> >Can you provide me with the following information:
> >     1.  How many DASRs have been filed since July 1, 2001
> >     2.  Of those, how many were inappropriately removed from direct
> >access back in February and how many were eligible, but never placed on
> >direct access service due to Enron mistake?
> >I will use discretion in sharing the precise breakdown information on
> >the post-July 1 DASRs, but it is important that we have a clear
> >understanding of the precise numbers.
> >
> >Please let me know if you have any questions on this matter.  I realize
> >that you are both busy, and I appreciate your attention to this matter.
> >
> >thanks
> >
> >Kelly
>
>


Wednesday, April 25 at 10 a.m. Houston time, join Sherri Sera, executive
assistant to Jeff Skilling, on eSpeak.  Sherri will answer questions about
how her job has changed since Jeff became CEO.

If you can't make the live event, post your questions on eSpeak now.  Sherri
will answer them during her eSpeak, and you can find the answers in the
transcript later.

Have you been wondering what happened to the information about Enron's
severance pay policy?   Would you like to see an innovation suggestion for
the Saturn's ring that will connect the two Enron buildings?  Read the new
postings in the "Office of the Chairman" category in eMeet.

Thanks for the great response to the new "Cost Reduction" category in the
Idea Vault!  Visit the ThinkBank today and read the suggestions for cutting
costs; and, while you're there, add your own.


Here's my original email

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 06/04/2001 02:05 PM -----

	Sara Shackleton
	06/01/2001 04:46 PM

		 To: mperkins@ix.netcom.com
		 cc: Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Enron North America Corp. ("ENA") Global Custody and Clearance
Agreement

Mary:

Attached is the latest draft from Chase.

In particular, please take a look at the following paragraphs:

2.A (the definition of "Securities")
5.B (lien on securities)
5.C (setoff)

The ENA contact is Gennaro Contella.  Please leave me or Sheila a voice mail
and we can arrange a conference call on Monday with Gennaro, Nancy Callahan,
if necessary (Chase legal) and anyone that you need to conference in on
behalf of Enron Corp.  The traders are anxious to have this account in place.

Irrespective of which Enron entity takes ownership of this agreement, we were
looking to you for information regarding existing Chase accounts (in ENA's
name).

Thanks for your help.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 06/01/2001 04:38 PM -----

	Nancy.K.Callahan@chase.com
	05/31/2001 01:45 PM

		 To: Sara.shackleton@enron.com
		 cc: Gennaro.Contella@chase.com
		 Subject: Enron Global Custody and Clearance Agreement

As requested, attached is the final Agreement which I believe reflects the
revisions we discussed this morning.  If this is acceptable, please have
the Agreement executed on behalf of Enron and return the necessary
counterparts to me for signature by Chase.  I will then return fully
executed copies to you.
(See attached file: Enron.doc)
 - Enron.doc


Dear john.griffith@enron.com,

Thank you for filling out the eBay registration information. Now that we have
verified your email address, just one last easy step and you will be
registered!

Please note - you must complete this final step to become a registered eBay
member.

To complete your registration, click on the link below:
http://cgi4.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?EBayRegisterConfirm&number=25178&ema
il=john.griffith@enron.com

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
**** Having problems with the above link? ****
If so, please use your Web browser to go to:
http://cgi4.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?EBayRegisterConfirm
Please to be sure not to add extra spaces. You will need to type in your eBay
User ID and Confirmation code on the next screen that appears.

Your eBay User ID is: john.griffith@enron.com
Your Confirmation code is: 25178
Note: This is not your password. You will create your eBay password on the
next screen.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

For assistance completing your eBay registration, please contact
support.


I attend a regular meeting with AA and Rick Causey discussing EES internal
controls. They have asked for a detailed presentation on :

-EAM business
-Tariff curve summary and positions against those curves
-Credit issues in general.

I will try and get more details for this but we should get together soon and
get it organized. EES may attend but not present. I think we should give them
an overview of the business and what needs to be accomplished in each of the
above areas. Probably a one hour mtg but maybe two. Lets try to meet next
week.

Karen- please set up.

Tx Rick
-


Recently, Julie Armstrong, senior administrative assistant to Danny McCarty, was honored by the Arthritis Foundation with the "All Star Salute to Excellence" award. This award is given annually to a person who suffers from arthritis and demonstrates excellence towards the community and the foundation.

As an individual who battles with arthritis, Julie's been involved with the Arthritis Foundation for over four years. During this time, she has worked on various committees for the Arthritis Foundation's All Star Salute to Secretaries.

In addition to the Arthritis Foundation, Julie volunteers her time and support to other non-profit organizations, including the Sunshine Kids and Houston Aeros Charities event benefiting the Stehlin Foundation.

Congratulations Julie.


I still plan to be out on Friday - guess I should use my discretionary
holiday first.

I should be in NYC Wednesday  and Thursday.  I don't need you to do anything
in that regard yet.

Thanks,

Kay


Perry fills one spot on PUC
Former Enron exec draws opposition
By JANET ELLIOTT
Copyright 2001 Houston Chronicle Austin Bureau
AUSTIN -- Mario Max Yzaguirre, a former Enron executive, was appointed
Wednesday by Gov. Rick Perry to the state agency that is overseeing
electricity deregulation in Texas.
Yzaguirre was named to replace Judy Walsh on the three-member Public Utility
Commission of Texas.
Yzaguirre, of South Padre Island, recently resigned as president of Enron's
Mexico operations. He formerly worked as a lawyer at Houston's Vinson &
Elkins.
In 1989, Yzaguirre was fined $15,000 after pleading guilty to a federal
charge of killing a whooping crane while hunting near the Aransas National
Wildlife Refuge north of Corpus Christi. Yzaguirre, who thought he was
shooting at a snow goose, also paid $6,480 in restitution to the state over
the death of the endangered bird.
He is the son of former University of Texas Regent Mario Yzaguirre of
Brownsville.
The governor's office also is working to replace Chairman Pat Wood III, who
stepped down after President Bush named him to the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, which oversees interstate electricity transmission. Yzaguirre
will join Commissioner Brett Perlman, a former business consultant.
Janee Briesemeister, a consumer advocate who monitors the PUC, said the
appointment of a energy industry insider "sends the wrong signal to consumers
in the state, particularly when that energy company is Enron, which has
profited handsomely from the energy crisis in California."
"While resignation of his position at Enron and divestiture of any
energy-related stock holdings may meet the technical requirements of the law,
the intent of the law is to eliminate even the perception of a conflict or
impropriety," said Briesemeister, senior policy analyst for Consumers Union.
"Regardless of his actions while commissioner, a perceived conflict could
limit his effectiveness."
The PUC is monitoring the deregulation of the Texas electric market, set to
begin Jan. 1. Deregulation in California has resulted in skyrocketing energy
costs and electricity shortages. The PUC also oversees the telecommunications
market.
Yzaguirre had been with Enron from 1995 until his recent resignation. Enron
is Houston's largest company in terms of revenues, generating $100.8 billion
in 2000.
Enron is vying to become a player in the deregulated Texas market. It formed
the New Power Co., a nationwide power and natural gas retail marketing
concern catering to residential and small-business customers.
The company is a joint venture of Enron, IBM and AOL Time Warner.


David,

Thanks. I cc you on my message to John Sherriff.
Please, let me know what you think about my comments.

Vince

David Gorte
05/15/2000 10:58 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Dash request

Vince,

I'll send you the DASH that was done previously for the used LNG tanker, the
Mystic Lady (now renamed as the Hoegh Galleon).  The analysis used in this
transaction was not detailed due the short time-frame we had to analyze this
transaction as well as to Enron's right to terminate this charter for
convenience.

We are presently working on the analysis for a second, new-build LNG tanker.
When this analysis has progressed far enough that we have a draft DASH, I
will forward it to you (this may be later this week).

Regards,

Dave


This request has been pending approval for  7 days and you are the alternate.  Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000078935&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000078935
Approver            : sandeep.kohli@enron.com
Request Create Date : 12/11/01 10:27:11 AM
Requested For       : miguel.l.garcia@enron.com
Resource Name       : \\enehou\houston\common\Research - [Read]
Resource Type       : Directory


ENRON OFFERS TO FINANCE AZURIX BUYOUT AT $7/SHR
10/27/0 13:44 (New York)

     (The following is a reformatted version of a press release issued by
Azurix
Corp.)

AZURIX CORP. RECEIVES PROPOSAL FROM ENRON CORP. TO FINANCE AZURIX PUBLIC SHARE
BUY-OUT

     HOUSTON - Azurix Corp. announced today that its Board of Directors has
received a proposal from Enron Corp. to provide funding to take Azurix private
at a buyout price of $7.00 per share. The specific structure of the proposal
has
yet to be determined. Azurix is filing today a copy of the proposal with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to a Form 8-K.
     Azurix Corp. (www.azurix.com) is a global water company that owns,
operates
and manages water and wastewater assets, provides water and wastewater related
services, and develops and manages water resources. Azurix offers e-business
solutions in the areas of procurement, engineering and design, water supply
and
storage and billing and collections. Azurix is listed on the Russell 2000 U.S.
equity index. Its stock is traded on the NYSE under the ticker symbol, "AZX."

(bh) PN
-0- (CRL) Oct/27/2000 17:44 GM

Enron Offers to Lend $275 Mln to Take Azurix Unit Private
10/27/0 13:38 (New York)

Enron Offers to Lend $275 Mln to Take Azurix Unit Private

     Houston, Oct. 27 (Bloomberg) -- Enron Corp., the world's
largest energy trader, offered to provide $275 million in
financing to take Azurix Corp., its struggling water affiliate,
private.
     The proposal would let Azurix buy back shares from private
investors at $7 apiece, a 96 percent premium to yesterday's
closing prices for the Houston-based company, Enron said.
     Azurix would buy back one-third of company. Enron already
owns a third of the water company it created two years ago, and
controls another third through an investor group called Atlantic
Water Trust.
     Azurix shares have fallen more than 80 percent since Enron
took the company public last year as part of a plan to exploit an
expected boom in water treatment projects worldwide.
     Rebecca Mark, once considered in line for the chief
executive's post at Enron, resigned in August as Azurix's chairman
and chief executive because of the company's poor performance.
     Shares of Azurix halted trading at $3.94 on the New York
Stock Exchange today. They've fallen from a high of $23.88 in July
1999. The company now has a market capitalization of $462 million.
    Shares of Houston-based Enron rose 88 cents to $77.38 in early
afternoon trading.

--Margot Habiby in Dallas (214) 740-0873, or
mhabiby@bloomberg.net, through the Princeton newsroom (609) 279-
4000/alp

Story illustration: To see the breakdown of Enron's annual sales,
see {ENE US <Equity> DES6 <GO>}.


For the May 8th expanded staff meeting, I would like to include Kevin Heal
(Lead, Logistics) and Dianne Seib (Sr. Specialist, Documentation) as well as
Kathy Reeves who is currently my only direct report at the manager level.
Kevin and Dianne provide a lot of leadership to their respective groups, and
I think it would be very useful for them to hear what Beth has to say.  Do
you think this will cause a problem given that you are restricting the
Houston attendance?  Let me know your thoughts.

For the PRC meeting, I am currently planning to be in Houston June 15th and
16th for the Global conference.  The best dates for me would be Tuesday, June
13th or  Wednesday, June 14th, and I'll just come to Houston earlier than
planned.  Let me know once you've finalized the date.

For the training, there are only three people in Energy Operations doing
reviews.  The three are Kevin Heal, Kathy Reeves and me.  I don't know
Norma's last name so would you mind forwarding this list to her.  I will talk
to Dawn Doucet about the best way to coordinate the training.

Let me know if you have questions.


I'm cool.  How are  the kitties?  Ingrid is starting to expand, of course she's not as big as me yet.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Veselack, Joni" <joni.veselack@neg.pge.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, November 09, 2001 2:03 PM
To:	Germany, Chris
Subject:	RE: Are you okay

You broke the code!!!! Evil Empire is letting you communicate!!

ARe you okay???

-----Original Message-----
From: Germany, Chris [mailto:Chris.Germany@ENRON.com]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 2:42 PM
To: joni.veselack@neg.pge.com
Subject: RE: Are you okay

Does this email still work or is Enron trying to control all info in and
out of the building?

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Germany, Chris
> Sent:	Thursday, November 08, 2001 4:11 PM
> To:	'"Veselack, Joni" <joni.veselack@neg.pge.com>@ENRON'
> Subject:	RE: Are you okay
>
> JOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONINNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiiiiii
> iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii....................
>
> I'm ok.  I'm leaving.  Talk to you later and thanks.
>
>
> 	 -----Original Message-----
> 	From: 	"Veselack, Joni" <joni.veselack@neg.pge.com>@ENRON
> 	Sent:	Thursday, November 08, 2001 3:34 PM
> 	To:	Germany, Chris
> 	Subject:	Are you okay
>
> 	I have all of my enron friends in my thoughts. I'm really sorry
> about what's
> 	going on.
>
>
> 	PG&E National Energy Group and any other
> 	company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or
> 	logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and
> 	Electric Company, the regulated California utility.  Neither
> 	PG&E National Energy Group nor these other
> 	referenced companies are regulated by the California Public
> 	Utilities Commission.  Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric
> Company
> 	do not have to buy products from these companies in order
> 	to continue to receive quality regulated services from the
> utility.

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************